Agenda packet — Rancho Cordova City Council, September 6, 2022 (part 2 of 5)

City Council Staff Report – Page 3 of 4
The overall portfolio is well diversified with $104.8 million invested in marketable securities, $64.6 million is invested in short-term investments that are considered liquid (LAIF, CAMP, and money markets), and another $107.4 million is on deposit with our banks, which includes $11.6 million on deposit with three local banks as part of the City’s participation in a local banking initiative and COVID-19 Lift Program. Staff, in conjunction with our financial advisors, periodically reviews the mix of liquid and long-term investments and adjusts the portfolio according to the market conditions and our short-term cash needs.

Staff thoroughly reviews investment statements and makes appropriate inquiries of its investment advisors to confirm the existence and viability of the City’s assets. The City invests conservatively in investment policy options in accordance with the California Government Code.

The long-term assets are in securities that can be held to maturity, thus are less vulnerable to the fluctuations of the market. All securities are in compliance with the City’s investment policy.

There are sufficient funds to meet the City’s expenditure requirements for the next six months.

The distribution of investments are displayed in the following charts:

Under 1 Year

69.1%
1 to 3 Years

25.3%
Over 3 Years

5.6%
Investment Ladder

Page 162 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 4 of 4

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. City of Rancho Cordova Treasurer’s Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2022 Short Term Investment
Pool 63.1%
U.S. Treasury Bond / Note

14.8%
Supra-National Agency
Bond / Note 0.4%
Municipal Bond / Note

0.7%
Federal Agency
Collateralized Mortgage
Obligation 0.1%
Federal Agency Bond /
Note 8.9%
Corporate Note 4.2%
Corporate Bonds 4.3%Commercial Paper 0.4% Certificate of Deposit 0.7%Asset-Backed Security

2.4%
Allocation By Security Type

Page 163 of 600 ends

Security Held Book Value Market Value
Wells Fargo Bank 95,822,243 95,822,243
5 Star Bank 5,290,111 5,290,111
American River Bank 5,274,456 5,274,456
Tri Counties Bank 1,000,015 1,000,015
Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) 6,204,509 6,204,509 CAMP Pool 58,422,984 58,422,984
CAMP Managed Account 62,105,818 59,344,591
Insight Investment 42,679,082 41,669,233
Total 276,799,217
273,028,142

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

TREASURER'S REPORT
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED June 30, 2022
ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 164 of 600 ends

ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 165 of 600 ends

ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 166 of 600 ends

ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 167 of 600 ends

ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 168 of 600 ends

ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 169 of 600 ends

ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 170 of 600 ends

ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 171 of 600 ends

ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 172 of 600 ends

ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 173 of 600 ends

ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 174 of 600 ends

ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 175 of 600 ends

SECURITIES HELD
As of June 30, 2022

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Asset Backed Securities
89239JAD6 2 .570 08/15/2023 58,671.11 57,951.09 (346.81) 61.66 0.1457,604.2857,582.44TOYOTA AUTO RECEIVABLES OWNER TAOT 2019-B A3 Total Asset Backed Securities 58,671.11 57,951.09 57,604.28 (346.81) 0.1461.6657,582.44 Cash and Cash Equivalents

0.000 1 71,051.16 171,051.16 0.00 0.00 0.40171,051.16171,051.16Cash and Cash Equivalents Total Cash and Cash Equivalents 171,051.16 171,051.16 171,051.16 0.00 0.400.00171,051.16 Corporate Bonds
46625HJE1 3 .250 09/23/2022 1,014,000.00 1,000,933.33 612.29 8,756.94 2.351,001,545.621,000,000.00JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 3.25% 23SEP2022 02665WDH1 1.950 05/10/2023 609,648.00 606,141.44 (12,423.88) 1,625.00 1.42593,717.56600,000.00AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 1.95% 10MAY2023 90331HNV1 3.400 07/24/2023 682,090.50 658,428.53 (8,975.99) 9,576.67 06/24/2023

1.58649,452.54650,000.00US BANK NA CINCINNATI 3.4% 24JUL2023 (CALLABLE 23JUN23)
69349LAM0 3.800 07/25/2023 775,057.50 767,684.72 (15,648.00) 12,270.83 06/25/2023

1.80752,036.72750,000.00PNC BANK NA 3.8% 25JUL2023 (CALLABLE 25JUN23) 89236THA6 1.350 08/25/2023 1,006,650.00 1,004,685.48 (27,007.30) 4,687.50 2.34977,678.181,000,000.00TOYOTA MOTOR CREDIT CORP 1.35% 25AUG2023 06051GHC6 3.004 12/20/2023 888,190.50 859,896.93 (12,683.34) 709.28 12/20/2022

2.06847,213.59850,000.00BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.004% 20DEC2023 (CALLABLE 20DEC22)
02665WCT6 3.550 01/12/2024 654,468.00 627,685.39 (26,851.47) 9,940.00 1.52600,833.92600,000.00AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 3.55% 12JAN2024 8 ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 176 of 600 ends

SECURITIES HELD
As of June 30, 2022

2.501,002,894.771,000,000.00CITIBANK NA 3.65% 23JAN2024 (CALLABLE 23DEC23) 459200HU8 3.625 02/12/2024 652,356.00 628,937.50 (27,667.62) 8,337.50 1.51601,269.88600,000.00IBM CORP 3.625% 12FEB2024 037833CU2 2.850 05/11/2024 413,260.00 405,180.22 (8,066.57) 1,551.67 03/11/2024

0.96397,113.65400,000.00APPLE INC 2.85% 11MAY2024 (CALLABLE 11MAR24) 14913R2L0 0.450 05/17/2024 998,760.00 999,135.45 (51,822.02) 537.50 2.32947,313.431,000,000.00CATERPILLAR FINL SERVICE 0.45% 17MAY2024 06051GHL6 3.864 07/23/2024 856,216.00 827,219.63 (30,732.84) 13,481.07 07/23/2023

1.99796,486.79800,000.00BANK OF AMERICA CORP 3.864% 23JUL2024 (CALLABLE 23JUL23)
931142DV2 2.650 12/15/2024 1,009,812.00 994,454.86 (56,286.10) 1,048.96 10/15/2024

2.34938,168.76950,000.00WALMART INC 2.65% 15DEC2024 (CALLABLE 15OCT24) 166764BW9 1.554 05/11/2025 1,525,696.00 1,529,263.69 (12,133.69) 3,384.27 04/11/2025

3.541,517,130.001,600,000.00CHEVRON CORP 1.554% 11MAY2025 (CALLABLE 11APR25)
Total Corporate Bonds 12,163,024.50 11,955,040.81 11,622,855.41 (332,185.40) 28.2491,825.2511,800,000.00 Government Agencies
3135G0T78 2 .000 10/05/2022 988,920.00 999,162.61 369.72 4,722.22 2.30999,532.331,000,000.00FANNIE MAE 2% 05OCT2022 3133EA7E2 1.960 11/07/2022 1,009,046.00 1,001,126.32 (1,777.21) 2,885.56 2.34999,349.111,000,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 1.96% 07NOV2022 3135G0T94 2.375 01/19/2023 998,228.00 982,836.10 (3,418.72) 10,409.10 2.32979,417.38980,000.00FANNIE MAE 2.375% 19JAN2023 3133EKKT2 2.250 02/08/2023 853,524.00 842,260.91 (3,428.40) 7,455.00 1.98838,832.51840,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2.25% 08FEB2023 9 ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 177 of 600 ends

SECURITIES HELD
As of June 30, 2022

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Government Agencies
3130AJ7E3 1 .375 02/17/2023 1,201,698.09 1,201,140.43 (11,026.29) 6,095.83 2.791,190,114.141,200,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 1.375% 17FEB2023 3130ADRG9 2.750 03/10/2023 1,014,967.70 1,002,653.85 (2,305.01) 8,402.78 2.361,000,348.841,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.75% 10MAR2023 #0000 3133EKGC4 2.250 04/05/2023 996,160.00 999,265.14 (2,184.87) 5,312.50 2.31997,080.271,000,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2.25% 05APR2023 3137EAEN5 2.750 06/19/2023 1,015,570.00 1,003,601.01 (5,954.63) 840.28 2.36997,646.381,000,000.00FREDDIE MAC 2.75% 19JUN2023 3135G0U43 2.875 09/12/2023 1,022,617.15 995,804.93 (10,894.45) 8,495.63 2.37984,910.48985,000.00FANNIE MAE 2.875% 12SEP2023 3133EKKU9 2.300 11/08/2023 1,122,682.00 1,107,010.02 (15,573.12) 3,654.44 2.611,091,436.901,100,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2.3% 08NOV2023 3133EJ2B4 3.000 12/06/2023 1,339,837.50 1,297,938.11 (45,951.12) 2,500.00 3.111,251,986.991,250,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 3% 06DEC2023 3134GVP51 0.500 12/15/2023 1,000,000.00 1,000,000.00 (35,272.70) 208.33 2.32964,727.301,000,000.00FREDDIE MAC 0.5% 15DEC2023 CALLABLE 3133EKMX1 2.230 02/23/2024 2,129,174.84 2,110,523.53 (36,088.74) 16,520.58 4.942,074,434.792,100,000.00FEDERAL FARM CREDIT BANK 2.23% 23FEB2024 3130AMQQ8 0.350 04/23/2024 999,000.00 999,364.17 (42,327.52) 68.06 09/23/2022

2.32957,036.651,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.35% 23APR2024 (CALLABLE 23SEP22)
3130A1XJ2 2.875 06/14/2024 881,814.28 854,629.10 (22,627.74) 1,066.94 2.05832,001.36835,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 2.875% 14JUN2024 3135GAC90 0.250 07/15/2024 500,000.00 500,000.00 (26,686.83) 572.92 07/15/2022

1.16473,313.17500,000.00FANNIE MAE 0.25% 15JUL2024 (CALLABLE 15JUL22) 10 ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 178 of 600 ends

SECURITIES HELD
As of June 30, 2022

2.33935,340.551,000,000.00FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK 0.5% 10FEB2025 (CALLABLE 10AUG22)
Total Government Agencies 18,076,099.56 17,897,316.23 17,567,509.15 (329,807.08) 41.9781,154.6117,790,000.00 Government Bonds
9128282S8 1 .625 08/31/2022 977,854.91 998,892.75 1,185.75 5,387.23 2.271,000,078.501,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.625% 31AUG2022 912828VB3 1.750 05/15/2023 854,548.83 851,096.81 (9,397.59) 1,859.38 1.98841,699.22850,000.00USA TREASURY 1.75% 15MAY2023 91282CCN9 0.125 07/31/2023 742,795.48 744,959.38 (17,459.38) 388.47 1.72727,500.00750,000.00USA TREASURY 0.125% 31JUL2023 9128282D1 1.375 08/31/2023 987,734.38 996,237.49 (14,714.05) 4,558.42 2.29981,523.441,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.375% 31AUG2023 912828T26 1.375 09/30/2023 985,940.85 995,876.10 (15,290.16) 3,418.72 2.29980,585.941,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.375% 30SEP2023 912828T91 1.625 10/31/2023 512,638.39 508,245.37 (16,897.71) 1,346.81 1.19491,347.66500,000.00USA TREASURY 1.625% 31OCT2023 91282CDM0 0.500 11/30/2023 1,191,894.65 1,193,932.70 (34,713.96) 491.80 2.771,159,218.741,200,000.00USA TREASURY 0.5% 30NOV2023 912828W71 2.125 03/31/2024 1,019,143.98 1,007,581.77 (22,308.33) 5,283.47 2.37985,273.441,000,000.00USA TREASURY 2.125% 31MAR2024 91282CCG4 0.250 06/15/2024 894,413.17 896,323.37 (42,870.24) 92.21 2.08853,453.13900,000.00USA TREASURY 0.25% 15JUN2024 912828YE4 1.250 08/31/2024 1,180,999.95 1,171,890.44 (63,982.23) 4,765.63 2.741,107,908.211,150,000.00USA TREASURY 1.25% 31AUG2024 11 ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 179 of 600 ends

SECURITIES HELD
As of June 30, 2022

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Amortized cost Fair value Unrealized
gain
(loss)
Coupon Maturity/
Call date
Historical costCusip Total
accrued
interest
%
Port
cost
Par value or
shares
Description
Government Bonds
912828YH7 1 .500 09/30/2024 929,077.23 921,385.67 (50,776.29) 3,356.56 2.16870,609.38900,000.00USA TREASURY 1.5% 30SEP2024 912828YY0 1.750 12/31/2024 1,041,253.35 1,031,325.16 (62,184.54) 0.00 2.42969,140.621,000,000.00USA TREASURY 1.75% 31DEC2024 91282CAJ0 0.250 08/31/2025 1,279,250.00 1,279,975.54 1,899.46 1,160.33 2.971,281,875.001,400,000.00USA TREASURY 0.25% 31AUG2025 Total Government Bonds 12,597,545.17 12,597,722.55 12,250,213.28 (347,509.27) 29.2532,109.0312,650,000.00 Grand total 43,066,391.50 42,679,081.84 (1,009,848.56)42,468,633.60 100.00205,150.5541,669,233.28 12 ITEM 9.11.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 180 of 600 ends

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 10.1.

DATE: September 6, 2022

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Quoc Nham, Senior Civil Engineer

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION VACATING A PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 11295 FOLSOM BOULEVARD AND RESERVING A PUBLIC UTILITY
EASEMENT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3,
PART 3 OF PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS, AND SERVICE
EASEMENTS VACATION LAW COMMENCING AT SECTION 8320 OF

THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, AND

DECLARING CITY PROPERTY AS EXEMPT SURPLUS LAND

PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA SURPLUS LAND ACT

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution would vacate approximately 6,352 square feet of right-of-way that is unimproved behind the existing sidewalk at the curve return of the northwest portion of the intersection of Folsom Boulevard and Citrus Road. A public utility easement shall be reserved for any existing or future uses.

BACKGROUND

An application for Multifamily Housing Streamlined Design Review Permit has been made with the Planning Department by St. Anton Communities, LLC for an 82-unit income and rent restricted multifamily housing community project at 11295 Folsom Boulevard. The Rancho Cordova Public Works Department found an excess of unimproved right-of-way behind the exiting ultimate improvements that is no longer needed. A condition to abandon the excess right-of-way was placed on the design review permit by Public Works to be completed prior to approval of the permit. The vacating of this right-of-way will also allow for needed parking spaces.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

There is no fiscal impact to the city.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

Page 181 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

2. Exhibit A to the Resolution

3. Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 182 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, VACATING A PORTION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AT 11295 FOLSOM

BOULEVARD AND RESERVING A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3, PART 3 OF PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS, AND SERVICE EASEMENTS VACATION LAW COMMENCING AT SECTION 8320 OF THE CALIFORNIA

STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, AND DECLARING CITY PROPERTY AS EXEMPT

SURPLUS LAND PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA SURPLUS LAND ACT

WHEREAS, the City is the owner of approximately 6,352 square feet of Folsom Boulevard right-of-way property located near Citrus Road as depicted on Exhibit A (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, a hearing date was scheduled for a proposed resolution to vacate the Property and reserve a public utility easement located at 11295 Folsom Boulevard; and

WHEREAS, a notice of the hearing has been posted at City Hall at least two weeks in advance of the hearing; and

WHEREAS, notice of date, time, and place of hearing of the proposed vacating was published for at least two successive weeks prior to the hearing; and

WHEREAS, at least two weeks before the day set for the hearing, at least three notices of vacation were conspicuously posted along the right of way to be vacated, not more than 300 feet apart; and
WHEREAS, the Surplus Land Act, Government Code Section 54220, et seq., as amended by Assembly Bill 1486 effective January 1, 2020, provides that local public agencies must determine whether land owned by the public agency is "surplus land" or "exempt surplus land," and must send notices of availability of surplus land to specified parties prior to the conveyance of such land; and
WHEREAS, Section 54221(f)(1)(E) of the Surplus Land Act provide that "exempt surplus land" include: "(E) Surplus land that is a former street, right-of-way, or easement, and is conveyed to an owner of an adjacent property"; and
WHEREAS, the Surplus Land Act Guidelines provide that a local agency which determines that property is exempt from Surplus Land Act shall support such a determination with written findings and shall provide a copy of the written determination to the California Department of Housing and Community Development at least 30 days prior to disposition; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to make certain findings with respect to the exemption of the disposition of the City right-of-way from the Surplus Land Act pursuant to the exceptions noted above; and

WHEREAS, the hearing described above has been conducted, and this Council, having heard and considered all oral, documentary and other evidence presented, hereby finds,

Page 183 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 2 determines and orders as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA that the Council hereby finds as follows:

Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 4, Part 3 of Public Streets, Highways, and Service Easements Vacation Law commencing at Section 8330 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the right-of-way line located at 11295 Folsom Boulevard is determined to be excess for present or prospective public use, and there are no other public facilities located within the right of way. The City of Rancho Cordova Department of Public Works has no objection to this vacation.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that:

1. The right-of-way as described in Exhibit A and shown on Exhibit B is hereby vacated; reserving the public utility easement pursuant to Streets and Highways Code section 8340(a).

2. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cordova shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution of Vacation, attested by the clerk under seal, to be recorded without acknowledgment, certificate of acknowledgment, or further proof in the office of the Recorder of the County of Sacramento.

3. From and after the date this resolution is recorded, the Property no longer constitutes a street or highway.

4. The Property vacated is a former street, right-of-way, or easement and is being conveyed to an owner of an adjacent property, within the meaning of Section 544221(f)(1)(E) of the Surplus Land Act, and the City's vacation is therefore exempt surplus land.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 6th day of September 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Donald Terry, Mayor

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 184 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 185 of 600 ends

' �� [Rl� �� '
'
@�$3c@�o'@c@@4\c@@@@
' ' ' ' ' '
N 81°01'51" E 31.12'
R=l88.00
L'.1=12°21'22"
L=40.54
CH=Sl 5 ° 08' 50"£
n 40.46'

RIGJIT-OF-WAY
ABANDONMENT AREA -� V'\
6,352 SQ.FI'. OR 0.14 AC±
N49°24'54"E

36.50'
nMorrow
��ying
1255 Starboard Drive
�/
=ti V,
West Sacramento ~ CA ~ 95691
Phone: 916-372-8124
Email: [email protected]
www.morrowsurveying.com
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
� /
1> /
L1 = 78°40'06"
l=31.58
CH=Sl 8° 00' 32"W
,'29.16'
EXHIBIT "B"
R.O.W. Abandonment Area
City of Rancho Cordova
County of Sacramento
California
1· = 30'
DATE:
2022-06-24
SHEET
1 OF 1
ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 3
Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 186 of 600 ends

EXHIBIT B
ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 3
Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 187 of 600 ends

EXHIBIT B
ITEM 10.1.

ATTACHMENT 3
Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 188 of 600 ends

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 1

ITEM 10.2.

DATE: September 6, 2022

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Quoc Nham, Senior Civil Engineer
Albert Stricker, Public Works Director

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION VACATING A NO INGRESS OR EGRESS RIGHTS LINE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3, PART 3 OF

THE PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS, AND SERVICE EASEMENTS
VACATION LAW COMMENCING AT SECTION 8320 OF THE
CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE (3479 SUNRISE
BLVD)

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the resolution would vacate approximately 35 feet of the no ingress or egress rights line located at 3479 Sunrise Boulevard.

BACKGROUND

An application for Encroachment Permit No. ENC-21-0074 has been made with the Public Works Department by the owner, Vachayan Zokargan for a driveway to access from Sunrise Boulevard located at 3479 Sunrise Blvd. The Rancho Cordova Public Works Department has evaluated and determined that the no ingress or egress rights line is no longer needed by the public. The City will sell the no ingress or egress rights line in a manner and upon the terms and conditions approved by the City. A condition to abandon the no ingress or egress rights line was placed on the Encroachment Permit by Public Works to be completed prior to approval of the permit. The vacation of this no ingress or egress rights line will allow for vehicular access from Sunrise Boulevard.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

There is no fiscal impact to the City.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A to the Resolution

3. Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 189 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, VACATING A NO INGRESS OR EGRESS RIGHTS LINE PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 3, PART 3 OF THE PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS, AND SERVICES EASEMENTS VACATION LAW COMMENCING AT SECTION 8320 OF THE

CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE

WHEREAS, a hearing date was scheduled for a proposed resolution to vacate a portion of a no ingress or egress rights line located at 3479 Sunrise Boulevard; and

WHEREAS, a notice of the hearing has been posted at City Hall at least two weeks in advance of the hearing; and

WHEREAS, notice of the date, time, and place of hearing of the proposed vacation was published for at least two successive weeks prior to the hearing; and

WHEREAS, at least two weeks before the day set for the hearing, at least three notices of vacation were conspicuously posted along the easements to be vacated, not more than 300 feet apart; and

WHEREAS, the hearing described above has been conducted, and this Council, having heard and considered all oral, documentary and other evidence presented.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA that the Council hereby finds as follows:

Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 6, Article 2 of Public Streets, Highways, and Service Easements Vacation Law commencing at Section 8355 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the no ingress or egress rights line is no longer needed by the public. The legislative body will sell the property pursuant to Section 8355 of the California Streets and Highways Code in the manner, and upon the terms and conditions, approved by the legislative body. The City of Rancho Cordova Department of Public Works has no objection to this vacation.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that:

1. The no ingress or egress rights line located at 3479 Sunrise Boulevard and as described in Exhibit A and shown on Exhibit B is hereby vacated.

2. The terms and conditions, approved by the legislative body, is in the form of a purchase/sale agreement. The sale price of the no ingress or egress rights line shall match the appraised value. Per an Appraisal Report prepared by Bender Rosenthal Incorporated dated June 17, 2022, the no ingress or egress rights line is valued at $10,000.00.

3. Pursuant to Section 8357 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the purchase price for any property sold by the legislative body of a local agency pursuant to this article shall be paid into the treasury of the local agency to the credit of any fund, available for the same purposes for which the property was used, that the legislative body designates.

Page 190 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.2. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 2

4. The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cordova shall cause a certified copy of this Resolution of Vacation, attested by the clerk under seal, to be recorded without acknowledgment, certificate of acknowledgment, or further proof in the office of the Recorder of the County of Sacramento.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 6th day of September 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Donald Terry, Mayor

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 191 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.2.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 192 of 600 ends

E
r-
lf)
in 0
I
N
N
0 N
ocS N
.0 Q) u...
:;:: ""Cl
....;
:.0
:.c X W
I
0 co
0 I
N
CD
.....
� ..c X
w
�
Cl
a::
(.'.)
z

11..

11..
<(
�
:::, (/)
/
0 0:::
""Cl >
in
Q) Cf)
·c C :::,
(/)
a,
r-v
n
0 co
0 I
N
/Jl .....()
,a>
0 ct
N
0 N

EXHIBITS

ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF THE NO INGRESS
LEGEND:

OR EGRESS RIGHTS LINE, ACROSS PARCEL 41 PER 42 PM 11
APN: 072-0420-011
- - -- - -CENTERLINE
•-------BOUNDARY --------------- PARCEL LINES
3479 SUNRISE BOULEVARD, CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,

SACRAMENTO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
RFE ENGINEERING, INC. SCALE: 1" = 60'
SHEET1 OF 1
��"�"�� NO INGRESS OR EGRESS' RIGHTS LINE
,--i ·---------
1 FITZGERALD ROAD
---------------------------------,--------------------------I /- I I
�
Q 0::
�
LU
5 0
CQ
LU
�
::,
Cl)
50'
50'
/ I / I / I
I I
I
I
I
�
ffe)fijlffl@&/1 fiJ
ffeJ&lffl fdJ@J@®J] fdJ @alffla @J@J]
/jJ/j)/]§g @'t/��a@f} �
WfJfJl¼ U/J8W&�it/NJ&fl.!li1� !Mk©
t�
t �
N4T12'29"E 215.44 ---
��
PORTION OF @ � NO INGRESS OR �
EGRESS RIGHTS LINE � (@A
BEING ABANDONED /§J,'\J. ff!
/jJ{f.){lfjg @'t/Jlga@(j�@a@fj fl
WfJfJl¼ U[lf}WfE�itfNJ&� /1,/1,@

12.5' P.U.E.

PER 42 PM 11

MOST SOUTHERLY CORNER
PARCEL 41, 42 PM 11
I
I
I
I
I
..
iii
lt') 0 N
l.&J
0 0
" p
0)
I")
(/)
/jJ/j)/]§g @'t/�a@MJ�@a@Xg}{g]
c/)@fJf]fll]@@[lf}
60 0
1 INCH = 60 FEET
/jJ[f.)[lf}g @'tl�a@MJ�@a@fl@
WfJfJl¼ U[lf}W!E@it/NJ&[lf]if@ /1,/1,@
60 N.__ _________________________________ _..

ITEM 10.2.

ATTACHMENT 3
Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 193 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 1 of 11

MEMORANDUM
ITEM 10.3.

DATE:September 6, 2022
TO:Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM:Arlene Granadosin-Jones, AICP, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING SUNRIDGE LOT J VILLAGE 4 TENTATIVE

SUBDIVISION MAP, SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, AND MAJOR
DESIGN REVIEW - PROJECT NO. DD10028
PROPERTY OWNER:

Cresleigh Homes Corp.
433 California Street, 7th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
APPLICANT/DEVELOPER:

Cresleigh Homes Corp.
3001 Douglas Boulevard, Suite 110
Roseville, CA 95661
PROJECT: Sunridge Lot J Village 4 Tentative Subdivision Map, Special Development Permit, and Major Design Review.

FILE: DD10028
LOCATION: South of Douglas Road and East of Rancho Cordova Parkway within the Sunridge Specific Plan
APN: 067-1060-004-0000
PLANNER: Arlene Granadosin-Jones, AICP, Senior Planner

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution approving Sunridge Lot J Village 4 Tentative Subdivision Map, Special Development Permit, and Major Design Review.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would approve the Sunridge Lot J Village 4 Tentative Subdivision Map, a Special Development Permit, and Major Design Review for Master home plans. The subdivision map, Special Development Permit, and Major Design Review when a final map is approved, would allow for the construction of homes on individual lots and the sale of lots.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The project site, Sunridge Lot J tentative subdivision map was approved on April 6, 2006, and subdivided 81 acres into 4 Villages that consisted of 369 single family lots, 7.89 acres of parks,

4.05 acres of open space, and landscape corridors for pedestrian access, as shown in Figure 1: Site Location. Additionally, a Development Agreement was entered into on June 15, 2006 for Sunridge Lot J, which vests the standards in the specific plan that apply to consideration of the proposed design review. Villages 1 through 3 are currently under construction by Cresleigh

Page 194 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 2 of 11
Homes. The approved 2006 Sunridge Lot J Village 4 tentative subdivision map included 74 residential lots, as shown in Figure 2: Approved 2006 Sunridge Lot J Village 4.

Figure 1: Site Location
.

Figure 2: Approved 2006 Sunridge Lot J Village 4
Village 4

Page 195 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 3 of 11
The applicant, Cresleigh Homes, is requesting the following:
A proposed new Tentative Subdivision Map;
A Special Development Permit to revise the building setbacks; and A Major Design Review for three floor plans, each with three architectural elevations.

ANALYSIS
GENERAL PLAN/SPECIFIC PLAN CONSISTENCY:

The project site General Plan designation is Medium Density Residential (MDR). The Medium Density land use designation is generally characterized by small lot single-family detached, single-family attached and small apartment complexes. The proposed subdivision map is consistent with the MDR General Plan designation and is within the required density range of

6.1 – 18.0 dwelling units per acre. The approved subdivision lot density for this area is consistent with the MDR designation.

ZONING ORDINANCE:

The project site is located within Sunridge Lot J area that includes several residential density districts (RD-residential, commercial, and open space). The project site is zoned Residential Density 10 (RD-10) Sunridge Specific Plan District. The proposed subdivision of 71 lots is consistent with RD-10 zoning district.

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
The applicant is proposing a new tentative subdivision map for Sunridge Lot J Village 4. The new proposed subdivision lot layout is a combination of front-loaded lots with garages that can be accessed from the street and alley loaded “court type” lots, as shown in Figure 3: Lot Layout. The proposed subdivision includes the following:
40 front loaded lots (typical lot layout)
31 lots that will front an alley in a “court type” configuration that includes the following:
oFront door, driveway, and garage access from the alley. oCorner lots along alleys will include a pedestrian pathway from the sidewalk to the front porch.
oA pedestrian easement is included between the central alleys.

This proposed new map differs from the approved 2006 Sunridge Lot J Village 4 tentative subdivision map in the following ways:
Reduces the number of total lots from 74 lots to 71 lots. Provides a combination of front loaded and “alley court” configurations. Removes all rear alleys.
Creates pedestrian connections between two central alley courts.

Page 196 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 4 of 11
Figure 3: Lot Layout
Title 22 - Land Development: Title 22 of the City of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code regulates land division and is intended to supplement and implement the Subdivision Map Act. The proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with requirements and procedures of a subdivision map application.

Section 66474 of the California Subdivision Map Act requires a City to deny approval of a parcel map if specific findings cannot be made. As shown in Attachment 1, all applicable findings have been met supporting the tentative subdivision map request.

Page 197 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 5 of 11

MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW
The Sunridge Lot J Village 4 development includes three house plans, each with three proposed modern architectural styles, as shown in Figure 4: Village 4 Plans Front Elevation. All elevations (front, side, rear elevations) for each floor plan are shown in the attached project plans (Attachment 2).

Figure 4: Village 4 Plans Front Elevation
Elevation Plan 1: (1,832 sq ft) Plan 2: (2,206 sq ft) Plan 3: (2,522 sq ft) Skyline
Mayfair
Park
Manor
The proposed designs include multiple color schemes for body, fascia, trim/garage, roof material, and additional accent colors. The proposed designs are in compliance with the Sunridge Specific Plan Development Design Standards in the folllowing ways:
The proposed project utilizes materials, colors, and finishes that are coordinated to achieve a sense of continuity and quality in design.
The proposed designs include multiple color schemes and architectural details that create a visual interest and variation within the subdivision. All proposed housing unit plans are oriented with a portion of the active living space (living room, kitchen, family room) located toward the street/sidewalk side of the dwelling.

Page 198 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 6 of 11
All proposed housing unit plans provide a transition space between the sidewalk and the interior space of the dwelling in the form of front yard landscaping and a covered entryway.
The primary entrance to each housing unit is visible from the primary access street. All proposed housing unit plans have a garage door that does not extend beyond the primary living area of the home.
The front door to each residential unit is clearly visible from the adjacent street and distinctive architectural elements and materials are used to denote prominent entrances. Homes located on the corner will also include a courtyard area along the public right-of- way with a pathway leading from the sidewalk to either the courtyard area or front porch area. These features will provide some engagement with the streetscape, as shown in Figure 5: Proposed Courtyard Area and Pathways.

Figure 5: Proposed Courtyard Area and Pathways
Landscape Design
The submitted typical landscape plan depicts a variation of drought tolerant trees, shrubs and a small area of drought tolerant grass and natural grasses, as shown in Figure 6: Typical Landscape Plans. The full detail of the landscape plans and proposed plant materials can be seen in Attachment 2.

Page 199 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 7 of 11
Figure 6: Typical Landscape Plans
Approval of the Major Design Review, subject to the Project Plans (Attachment 2) and the Conditions of Approval (Attachment 3) must be in compliance with the Sunridge Specific Plan Development Design Standards. Supportive evidence for approval is shown in Attachment 1.

SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
The applicant is requesting a Special Development Permit to vary from the Sunridge Specific Plan setbacks, as summarized in Table 1: Proposed Sunridge Lot J Village 4 Setbacks.

Under the existing Sunridge Specific Plan’s building setbacks the desired proposed house plans are unable to meet the setback requirements and therefore this permit is required. The applicant is attempting to meet the unit allocation stipulated in the Specific Plan, however due to the lot size per the zoning density, this project would not be able to build to its allocation, without the reductions to the front, side and rear setbacks and distance to building development standards.

Figure 7: Village 4 Lot Diagrams shows each floor plan and the proposed building setbacks.

Table 1: Proposed Sunridge Lot J Village 4 Setbacks
Required per Sunridge
Specific Plan
Proposed Sunridge Lot J
Village 4
Front setback to
building 16’ 8’ to living (alley)

12.5’ to living (street)
Front setback to
garage 19’ 18’
Side yard setback 5’ / 4’ 4’
Rear yard setback 20% of the lot depth 8’

Page 200 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 8 of 11
Minimum distance
between buildings 9’ 8’
Figure 7: Village 4 Lot Diagrams
Elevation Plan 1: (1,832 sq ft) Plan 2: (2,206 sq ft) Plan 3: (2,522 sq ft) Street
Frontage
Lots
Alley
Frontage
Lots
The Special Development Permit also includes an easement along the side property line for the storage of trash bins, as shown in Figure 8: Proposed Trash Bin Easement. The proposed side yard setback is 4 feet wide. The proposed easement/fence would extend over the adjacent property line by 1 foot to increase the space for the trash bin storage to 5 feet wide. This would allow space for trash bin storage and maneuvering. The fence in this area would shift by 1 foot and then shift back by 1 foot.

Page 201 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 9 of 11
Figure 8: Proposed Trash Bin Easement
Approval of the Special Development Permit would allow the applicant to provide more innovative housing development layout than what was previously proposed in the approved 2006 tentative parcel map. The project proposes a combination of front-loaded lots with garages that can be accessed from the street and alley loaded lots that are arranged in a “court-type” configuration. Each “alley court” groups between four to six homes with the central alleys providing pedestrian pathways that connect the north-south streets. The enhanced connections provide improved pedestrian circulation throughout the development and to adjacent amenities such as the future park.

The applicant believes that the adopted 2006 Tentative Subdivision Map showing the public alleyway to the east of the development would only be used by the residents and would provide limited access for the entry and exit of their cars to the garages. This site layout creates significant amounts of time that there is no frequent use and visibility in the alley. Alleys that are not continually used and activated by vehicles and pedestrians may create spaces for illicit activity and have future enforcement issues. The proposed layout of backyard to backyard or backyard to side yard orientation, although with closer setbacks to existing homes in some cases, removes unused space between housing units.

Though the reduced setbacks provide smaller backyard space for housing units, the subdivision is located adjacent to a future park, which will be easily accessed via the improved pedestrian connections. The applicant will also include a courtyard area along the public right-of-way for corner lots to provide additional private outdoor areas and an additional architectural feature that engages with the street. Figure 9: Enhanced Side Conditions indicates which lots will have this courtyard feature and provides an illustrative rendering of the courtyard.

Page 202 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 10 of 11
Figure 9: Enhanced Side Conditions
As shown in Attachment 1, all applicable findings have been met supporting the Special Development Permit request.

ENVIRONMENTAL
A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was approved for Sunridge Lot J rezone and subdivision in 2006. The MND for Sunridge Lot J included site specific mitigation measures and references the mitigation measures within the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program prepared for the Sunridge Specific Plan EIR. The MND determined that the rezone and subdivision resulted in no significant increase to the impacts previously studied in the EIR for the Sunridge Specific Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the approved subdivision and therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.

FISCAL IMPACT
Staff anticipates that approval of the Tentative Parcel Map will result in additional revenues created from the potential sale of the residential lots through taxes collected for each lot.

Approval of the Major Design Review for the design of production homes within Sunridge Lot J Village 4 will benefit the City and the community by providing direct contributions to fund needed public infrastructure for this project and the broader community. While the project will generate additional demands for municipal services, the project will be subject to existing and new funding mechanisms to pay fair share costs for ongoing operations, maintenance, and services that will offset City costs.

Page 203 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report – Page 11 of 11

RECOMMENDED MOTION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
Find the project to be in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) consistent with the approved Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Sunridge Lot J rezone and subdivision; and
Adopt the Resolution approving Sunridge Lot J Village 4 Tentative Subdivision Map, Special Development Permit, and Major Design Review.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A to the Resolution – Tentative Subdivision Map and Project Plans

3. Exhibit B to the Resolution – Conditions of Approval

Page 204 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 5

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

APPROVING A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP, SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, AND MAJOR DESIGN REVIEW FOR SUNRIDGE LOT J VILLAGE 4 PROJECT NO. DD10028 WHEREAS, Cresleigh Homes Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Applicant) filed an application with the City of Rancho Cordova for a Tentative Subdivision Map, Special Development Permit, and Major Design Review for Sunridge Lot J Village 4 located within Sunridge Specific Plan. Parcel Number: 067-1060-004-0000; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met all applicable requirements under State law and City ordinances related to this Tentative Subdivision Map and the City Council is the appropriate authority to hear and take action on this project; and
WHEREAS, the attached Tentative Subdivision Map meets the requirements of the Subdivision Map Act and the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code as set forth in findings below, and the City Council has conducted a properly noticed public hearing for the approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map attached hereto in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act requirements; and
WHEREAS, the submitted application also includes a Special Development Permit for the revised building setbacks and a Major Design Review for the approval for Village 4 located in the Sunridge Lot J subdivision with 3 new floor plans each with three architectural styles design; and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved for Sunridge Lot J rezone and subdivision in 2006 in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, on September 6, 2022, the City Council held a properly noticed public hearing at which it received a report from City Staff regarding the tentative subdivision map, special development permit, and major design review and oral and written testimony from the public, and deliberated on the item; and
WHEREAS, the public hearing was noticed in accordance with the requirements set forth in Government Code section 65090 and 65091

NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:

1. Determine the project to be in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) consistent with the approved Mitigated Negative Declaration prepare for the Sunridge Lot J rezone and subdivision in 2006.
a)Finding: The project site has been analyzed and is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Page 205 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 5
Evidence: A Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved for Sunridge Lot J rezone and subdivision in 2006. The Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for Lot J included site specific mitigation measures and references the mitigation measures within the MMRP prepared for the Specific Plan EIR. The MND determined that the rezone and subdivision resulted in no significant increase to the impacts previously studied in the FEIR for the SRSP. The proposed project is consistent with the approved subdivision and therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.

2. In accordance with Government Code section 66473.5, the proposed Tentative Subdivision Map (Exhibit A) with attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit B) attached hereto is consistent with the applicable General and Specific Plan objectives, policies, land uses and programs. Section 66474 of the California Subdivision Map Act requires a City to deny approval of a parcel map, if any of the following findings cannot be made.

The following evidence supports the map request:
a)Finding: The proposed map is consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451.

Evidence: The proposed tentative subdivision map is consistent with the General Plan Medium Density Residential land use designation and is within the required density range of 6.1 to 18.0 dwelling units per acre. The Sunridge Lot J Village 4 project is located within the Sunridge Specific Plan and proposes housing unit types that are consistent with the Specific Plan.
b)Finding: The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with applicable general and specific plans.

Evidence: The proposed map is consistent with the Sunridge Specific Plan Village 4 layout concept. The residential lot count at 71 is three lots less than the original Sunridge Lot J Village 4 of 74 lots. The proposed street layout maintains the original Village 4 connections.
c)Finding: The site is physically suitable for the type of development.

Evidence: The site is physically suitable to subdivide. The subdivision maps were originally approved on April 6, 2006 and subdivided 81 acres into 4 Villages that consisted of 369 single family lots, 7.89 acres of parks, 4.05 acres of open space, and landscape corridors for pedestrian access. The proposed tentative subdivision map includes a new lot configuration with a combination of front loaded and alley or “court type” layout.
d)Finding: The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

Evidence: The proposed subdivision map lot count is 71 lots which is consistent with the Sunridge Specific Plan land use and zoning designation. For this area, the Specific Plan calls for lower density residential land use that will provide a mix of housing types and intensities ranging from single family residential to multi-family garden apartments,
townhouses and condominiums.

Page 206 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 3 of 5
e)Finding: The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

Evidence: The proposed project is located within the Sunridge Lot J. A Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved for Sunridge Lot J rezone and subdivision in 2006. The Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for Lot J included site specific mitigation measures and references the mitigation measures within the Mitigation and Monitoring Reporting Program prepared for the Sunridge Specific Plan EIR. The MND determined that the rezone and subdivision resulted in no significant increase to the impacts previously studied in the EIR for the Sunridge Specific Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the approved subdivision and therefore, no further environmental analysis is required.
f)Finding: The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems.

Evidence: The proposed subdivision map with the new lot layout will not cause serious public health problems. The residential subdivision includes 71 single family lots and is adjacent to other residential neighborhoods. The proposed project maintains the street layout in the Sunridge Specific Plan and enhances pedestrian connections between two centrally located alley courts.

g)Finding: The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the legislative body may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements, for access or for use, will be provided, and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public.

Evidence: The proposed Village 4 subdivision map layout does not conflict with any easements or access through the subdivision from the existing developments. The proposed street layout maintains the original Village 4 connections. The proposed improvements on the Tentative Subdivision Map and included within the project are consistent with the approved Sunridge Specific Plan, the City of Rancho Cordova Ordinances and Standards and do not conflict with public easements and related necessary access through the project.

3.Approve the Design Review, subject to the Project Plans (Exhibit A) and the Conditions of Approval (Exhibit B). The proposed project is in compliance with applicable guidelines of the Sunridge Specific Plan Development Design Standards, including in the following ways:
The proposed project utilizes materials, colors, and finishes that are coordinated to achieve a sense of continuity and quality in design.
The proposed designs include multiple color schemes and architectural details that create a visual interest and variation within the subdivision. All proposed housing unit plans are oriented with a portion of the active living space (living room, kitchen, family room) located toward the street/sidewalk side of the dwelling.

Page 207 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 4 of 5
All proposed housing unit plans provide a transition space between the sidewalk and the interior space of the dwelling in the form of front yard landscaping and a covered entryway.
The primary entrance to each housing unit is visible from the primary access street. All proposed housing unit plans have a garage door that does not extend beyond the primary living area of the home.
The front door to each residential unit is clearly visible from the adjacent street and distinctive architectural elements and materials are used to denote prominent entrances.
Homes located on the corner will also include a courtyard area along the public right-of-way with a pathway leading from the sidewalk to either the courtyard area or front porch area.

4. Approve the Special Development Permit in order to revise setbacks to accommodate the approved subdivision lot sizes with the proposed plans to maintain the desired housing product diversity. The following evidence supports the Special Development Permit request. Findings and supportive evidence are shown below:
a)Finding: That the proposed development will carry out the intent of the General Plan and the appropriate community plan.

Evidence: The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Medium Density Residential.
b)Finding: That the proposed development is of sufficient size and is designed so as to provide a desirable environment within its own boundaries.

Evidence: The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map is of sufficient size that includes small lot single- family lots that meets the density requirement within its own boundaries. The development is within walkable distance to the adjacent future park.

c)Finding: That the proposed development is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area.

Evidence: The site is physically suitable to subdivide and is compatible with existing and proposed land uses in the surrounding area as it is consistent with the General Plan and Sunridge Specific Plan in that they both allow for this type of development. d)Finding: That any exceptions to, or deviation from, the use, density, requirements or design standards of the Land Use Zone in which the property is located, or of Title II of the Sacramento Code are justified by the design of the development or by the substantial energy savings proposed pursuant to Section 110-65(b). In case of a residential area, the rearrangement of dwellings and the mixing of dwelling types shall be justified by larger and more usable open spaces.

Evidence: The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The proposed Tentative Subdivision Map will divide the existing parcel into 71 single- family homes that are a combination of front loaded and alley front loaded homes.

The overall residential density is 8.8 units per acre which is consistent with the RD-

Page 208 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 5 of 5
10 zoning designation in the 2003 Sacramento County Zoning Code. Improvements are provided as shown on the Tentative Subdivision Map (Exhibit A), and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval (Exhibit B).
e)Finding: That there is adequate assurance that all public improvements will be installed at the scheduled times, as required by Public Works.

Evidence: The project conditions of approval provide a time schedule for all public improvements as required by Public Works.

f)Finding: That there is adequate assurance that the development schedule will be met.

Evidence: The project includes an existing Development Agreement that has an expiration date of June 18, 2024.
g)Finding: That the existing or proposed utility services are adequate for the uses and population densities proposed.

Evidence: The existing and proposed utilities are adequate for the uses and population density proposed.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 6th day of September 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
____________________________
Donald Terry, Mayor
ATTEST:

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 209 of 600 ends

23 24 27 31 32
3330292622
66 67 68 69
62636465
56 55
57 54 53
58 59
52 34
47 48 49 50
4546
6 53 42
25 28
1 35
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 51
60 61
70 71
44 CANYONLANDS DRIVE

COBBLE BROOK DRIVE

ALLEY 'F' ALLEY 'G'

ALLEY 'D' ALLEY 'E'

AURA WAY

HETCH HECHY DRIVE

AURA WAY

DOUGLAS ROAD

ALLEY 'A' ALLEY 'B'

ALLEY 'C'
R=20'
R=20'
R=20'
R=25'
R=20'

AUDRIS WAY

HETCH HECHY DRIVE
69'
27'
71'
69'
72'72'72'
83' 83'
71' 71' 71' 71'
69'69'69'
83' 83' 83'
114'
114'
114'
117'
120'
119'
111'
101'
90'
79'
75'
75'
75'
75'
75'
26'
19'
18'
39'
55'
8'
59'
79'81'79'
71' 69'
55'
55'
45'
28' 28'
45'
61' 59'
45'
28'
79'81'
46'54'
64'56'
61'
46'
28'
48'
28' 36'
45' 45'
54'
82'
45'
70'56'72'
54' 45' 45' 54'
40' 56' 43'
61'45'10'30'
53'45'45'45'57'
55' 45' 45' 45' 56'
43' 45' 10' 30' 45' 43'
59'
63'
30'45' 46'45'30'
15'15'
79'
79'
45' 30' 30' 45' 46'
59'
49'
36'45'45'45'35'
49'
59'
69'
69'
69' 69'
69'
69'
69'
55' 45' 45' 45' 56'
59'
55'
57'
47'
47'
47'
47'
47'
47'
47'
47'
47'
37'
105' 114'
59'50'51'59'
39' 51' 50'
49'
50'
47'
47'
47'
47'
50'
47'
48'
48'
48'
47'
47'
47'
47'
47'
R=20'
R=20'
R=20'
R=30'
R=50'
R=50'
R=30'
56'
40'
12' PUE (EX)

13.5' PUE
10' PUE
10' PUE
10' PUE
10' PUE
10' PUE
10' PUE
10' PUE
10' PUE
10' PUE
10' PUE10.0' PUE
10' PUE10' PUE
10' PUE
5' PUE
5' PUE
5' PUE
5' PUE
5' PUE
5' PUE
5' PUE
5' PUE
5' PUE 5' PUE 5' PUE 5' PUE
5' PUE 5' PUE
20' 20'
20'
40'
40'
40'
20'20'
20'20'
40'
40'

13.5'
PE/LE (EX)23.5'PUE (EX)12.5' PUE (EX)

13.5' PE/LE (EX)

23.5' PUE (EX)
80'
66'
45'47'
45'46'
45'45'
45'45'
45'45'
45'45'
45'45'
45'45'
50'
69' 72'
73'
70'
80'
80'
80'
80'
80'
81'
88'
101'
59'
61'

VICINITY MAP

AEROJET

AMERICANOS BLVD
DR.

MATHER FIELD

ZINFANDEL

ROADROCK
BLVD
FOLSOM
U.S. HIGHWAY 50
BLVD

EAGLES NEST ROADKIEFER

SUNRISE BLVD

DOUGLAS ROAD
WHITE

PROJECT
SITE

CIVIL ENGINEERS

SURVEYORS
PLANNERSmsa
cbgA company
MSA ENGINEERING INC.
1430 BLUE OAKS BLVD. SUITE 110
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747
PHONE: (916) 788-4456
19-020 - SHEET 1 of 3
EXISTING ZONING:DESCRIPTION:

ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS:

SCHOOLS:

FIRE:

RECREATION:

PROPOSED USE:

MAP PHASING:

EXISTING USE:

STREET NAMES:

ENGINEER/PLANNER
NUMBER OF LOTS:

WATER:

STORM DRAINAGE:

PROJECT NOTES

OWNER/DEVELOPER
SANITARY SEWER:

LAND USE SUMMARY
LAND USE ACRES # UNITS
RD-10 LOTS (45' X 67')
TOTALS 8.07 AC

6.44 DENSITY
ELECTRIC:

GAS:

NOTES:

MAJOR STREETS 1.23
71 11.0 du/ac

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 26, 2022

CRESLEIGH HOMES CORPORATION
1410 ROCKY RIDGE, SUITE 120
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95661
(916) 886-2384

MSA ENGINEERING
1430 BLUE OAKS BOULEVARD, SUITE 110
ROSEVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95747
(916) 788-4456

THAT CERTAIN PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO,
UNINCORPORATED AREA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:

PARCEL 3, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP ENTITLED
“PARCEL MAP OF SUBDIVISION NO. RC-03-027.01A
SUNRIDGE VILLAGE LARGE LOT MAP” FILED FOR
RECORD ON JUNE 12, 2017 IN BOOK 230 OF PARCEL
MAP AT PAGE 3, SACRAMENTO COUNTY RECORDS.

THERE ARE NO KNOWN EASEMENTS WHICH AFFECT
THIS PARCEL.

THERE ARE NO EXISTING TREES ON THIS PARCEL.
(MASS GRADING OF THIS SITE WAS DONE WITH THE
SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 1 IMPROVEMENT PLANS).

THERE ARE NO WETLANDS ON THIS PARCEL.
(MASS GRADING OF THIS SITE WAS DONE WITH
THE SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 1 IMPROVEMENT PLANS).

AGRICULTURAL/SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
(EQUESTRIAN USES)
APN 067-1060-004

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
RD-10

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO - ZONE 40
71 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS

STREET NAMES SHOWN ARE FOR PLAN
IDENTIFICATION PURPOSES ONLY.

FINAL NAMES WILL BE SUBMITTED FOR
APPROVAL PRIOR TO FINAL MAP.

THIS SUBDIVISION WILL NOT BE PHASED.

CORDOVA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT

SACRAMENTO METRO FIRE DISTRICT

ELK GROVE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
PG&E
S.M.U.D.
100500
25 SCALE: 1"=50'
NORTH

RANCHOCORDOVA
PKWY

ALLEY SECTION

NO SCALE
6" P.C.C.
6" MIN A.B.

0.33'
(FUTURE PAD)

ALLEY CL
R/WR/W
PER SAC CO IMPROVEMENT STD DWG 4-39
EXIST. GROUND

NO SCALE
TYPICAL 40' STREET SECTION
CONST TYPE 2 CURB & GUTTERPLACE 9" AB
PLACE 3" AC
CL
2%
13'
20'
3' 4'
R/W
R=10.0, TI=5.0

1.5%2%
13'
20'
PLACE 6" MIN CL-2 AB

PCC SIDEWALK
CONST 3-5/8"x4'
3'4'
R/W

1.5%
40'
20'

SHEET INDEX
SHEET # TITLE SCALE
1 3
2 COVER SHEET

UTILITY

GRADING PLAN
1"=50'
1"=50'
1"=50'
LEGEND

PROJECT BOUNDARY

PROPOSED LOTS

RIGHT OF WAY

LIP OF CURB

TOP BACK OF CURB/SIDEWALK

PUE (PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT)

STREET CENTERLINE

DRAINAGE MAIN

SEWER MAIN

SEWER MANHOLE

WATER MAIN

DRAIN INLET

DRAIN MANHOLE

FIRE HYDRANT

GATE VALVE
8"WM
8"SS
12"SD
SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP

COVER SHEET
6'4'

1.5%
2'

1.5%
2'
R/W
(EX) 12" AB
(EX) 3 1/2" AC

NO SCALE
TYPICAL 50' STREET SECTION
2%
3'
25'
22'
CL
2%
22'
50'
25'
3'
R/W
R=8, TI=6.0

CANYONLANDS DRIVE
6'
10' PUE
16' P.U.E.

PARK SITE
& GUTTER (TYP.)
(EX) TYPE 2 CURB
6' P.E.

SUNRIDGE
VILLAGE 4
CONST 3- 5/8"x4' PCC
SIDEWALK OVER 6" AB
ALLEYS 0.40
71 J:\Projects\Sunridge\19-020 Sunridge Village 4\Entitlements\19-020-TM-01.dwg, 8/26/2022 10:34 AM

8.5' 5'

1.5%
2'

COBBLE BROOK DRIVE
R=8, TI=6.0
R/W
3'

21.5'
43'

18.5'
2%
CL

18.5'

21.5'
3'
2%
TYPICAL 43' STREET SECTION

NO SCALE
R/W
2'

1.5%
5' 8.5'
2%

13.5' L.E. & P.E.

23.5' P.U.E.

SUNRIDGE
VILLAGE 4
(EX) 12" AB
(EX) 3 1/2" AC
& GUTTER (TYP.)
(EX) TYPE 2 CURB
(EX) SIDEWALK

TO REMAIN
16' PUE (EX)
6' PE (EX)
6' PE (EX)
16' PUE (EX)

13.5' L.E./P.E. & PUE
5' PUE 5' PUE
10' PUE 10' PUE

SETBACK TABLE

PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY

ALLEY LOADED
REAR

SETBACK
FRONT

SETBACK
SIDE

SETBACK
GARAGE

SETBACK
MAIN

RESIDENCE
MIN.

OPEN PORCH

OR BALCONY
MIN.

REAR
YARD
MIN.

INTERIOR

SIDE YARD
MIN.

CORNER/

STREET SIDE
YARD MIN.

FRONT
ACCESS
MIN.

12.5'
8'

12.5'
8'
8'
8'
4'
4'

12.5'

12.5'
18'
18'

SUNRIDGE
VILLAGE 2

12.5' LIVING SETBACK
18' GARAGE SETBACK

12.5' STREET

SIDE/CORNER

SETBACK
8' LIVING SETBACK
18' GARAGE SETBACK
8' LIVING SETBACK
18' GARAGE SETBACK
10'10'
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 210 of 600 ends

CANYONLANDS DRIVE
23 24 27 31 32
3330292622
66 67 68 69
62636465
56 55
57 54 53
58 59
52 34
47 48 49 50
4546
6 53 42
25 28
1 35
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 51
60 61
70 71
44 COBBLE BROOK DRIVE

ALLEY 'G'

ALLEY 'D' ALLEY 'E'

AURA WAY

HETCH HECHY DRIVE

AURA WAY

DOUGLAS ROAD

ALLEY 'A' ALLEY 'B'

ALLEY 'C'
44 45

LOT DAUDRIS WAY

HETCH HECHY DRIVE
P=191.4
P=190.9
P=190.7
P=191.9
P=192.5
P=191.9
P=193.2
P=192.9
P=193.3
P=192.3
P=191.9
P=191.7
P=191.6
P=191.8P=191.6P=191.6
P=191.4 P=191.8 P=191.5 P=191.4
P=191.4P=191.5P=191.8P=191.4
P=190.6 P=191.8 P=191.6 P=191.6
P=191.6P=191.6P=190.9P=190.5
P=189.0 P=189.0 P=189.3 P=190.0
P=185.0 P=187.7
P=185.1 P=185.6 P=185.9 P=186.1
TW=190.60
FG=189.2
TW=190.60
FG=189.2
TW=190.60
FG=188.6
TW=190.90
FG=188.4
TW=190.90
FG=188.4
TW=190.90
FG=188.0
TW=190.90
FG=188.0
TW=190.30
FG=187.8
TW=190.30
FG=187.3
TW=190.30
FG=187.0
TW=190.30
FG=187.0
TW=189.50
FG=186.7
TW=190.50
FG=186.6
TW=189.50
FG=186.3
TW=189.50
FG=186.3
TW=188.30
FG=185.8
TW=188.30
FG=185.5
TW=188.30
FG=185.5
TW=200.41
BW=193.04
TW=201.08
BW=193.71
TW=201.75
BW=194.38
TW=201.75
BW=195.05
TW=202.42
BW=195.72
TW=203.09
BW=196.39
TW=203.76
BW=197.06
TW=200.41
BW=193.04
TW=201.08
BW=193.71
TW=201.75
BW=194.38
TW=201.75
BW=195.05
TW=202.42
BW=195.72
TW=203.09
BW=196.39
TW=203.76
BW=197.06
P=190.9
P=191.4
P=190.7
P=190.5
P=190.6
P=190.6
P=190.8
P=190.8
P=190.8
P=190.3
P=190.3
P=190.1
P=189.5
P=189.5
P=189.4
P=189.1
P=188.3
P=188.3
P=188.1
P=191.4
P=191.3
P=191.3
P=191.5
P=191.5
P=191.0
P=190.5
P=191.1 P=192.5
P=190.9

ALLEY 'F'
20'
40'
40'
20'
20'
20'
40'
20'
20' 20'
40'
40'

CIVIL ENGINEERS

SURVEYORS
PLANNERSmsa
cbgA company
MSA ENGINEERING INC.
1430 BLUE OAKS BLVD. SUITE 110
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747
PHONE: (916) 788-4456
19-020 - SHEET 2 of 3
100500 25
SCALE: 1"=50'
NORTH

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 26, 2022
SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP

GRADING PLAN
J:\Projects\Sunridge\19-020 Sunridge Village 4\Entitlements\19-020-TM-02.dwg, 8/26/2022 10:35 AM ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 211 of 600 ends

23 24 27 31 32
3330292622
66 67 68 69
62636465
56 55
57 54 53
58 59
52 34
47 48 49 50
4546
6 53 42
25 28
1 35
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 51
60 61
70 71
44 12"SD
6"SS
6"SS
8"WM8"WM
8"WM
8"WM
8"WM
8"SS
8"SS
12"SD
15"SD
15"SD
8"SS 8"SS
6"SS 6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
6"SS
8"WM
8"WM
8"SS
8"SS
8"SS
18"SD
8"WM
8"SS
12"WM12"WM
12"WM
8"SS
12"WM
8"SS
8"SS
12"SD
12"SD
8"SS
18"SD
18"SD
8"SS 8"SS
8"SS
8"WM
8"WM 8"WM
8"WM
8"SS
18"SD
8"SS
15"SD
12"SD
12"WM
12"WM
12"WM
8"SS
8"WM
8"SS12"WM
8"SS
8"SS8"WM
36"SD 30"SD
36"SD
36"SD
30"SD
42"SD42"SD
30"SD
15"SD
8"SS
36"SD
18"SD
44 45
LOT D
40'
2'

DOUGLAS ROADDOUGLAS ROAD

ALLEY 'A' ALLEY 'B'

ALLEY 'C'

AURA WAY

ALLEY 'D' ALLEY 'E'

HETCH HECHY DRIVE

AURA WAY

ALLEY 'F' ALLEY 'G'

CANYONLANDS DRIVE

HETCH HECHY DRIVE

COBBLE BROOK DRIVE

AUDRIS WAY
2' 2'
3'
6'6'
4'
3'
6'
4'3'
6'
3'
4'
2' 2'
2' 2'

CIVIL ENGINEERS

SURVEYORS
PLANNERSmsa
cbgA company
MSA ENGINEERING INC.
1430 BLUE OAKS BLVD. SUITE 110
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747
PHONE: (916) 788-4456
19-020 - SHEET 3 of 3
100500 25
SCALE: 1"=50'
NORTH
J:\Projects\Sunridge\19-020 Sunridge Village 4\Entitlements\19-020-TM-03.dwg, 8/26/2022 10:36 AM

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 26, 2022
SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4

TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP

UTILITY PLAN
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 212 of 600 ends

CANYONLANDS DRIVE

COBBLE BROOK DRIVE

ALLEY F ALLEY G

ALLEY D ALLEY E

AURA WAY

HETCH HECHY DRIVE AURA WAY

DOUGLAS ROAD

ALLEY A ALLEY B

ALLEY C

AUDRIS WAY

HETCH HECHY DRIVE

CIVIL ENGINEERS

SURVEYORS
PLANNERSmsa
cbgA company
MSA ENGINEERING INC.
1430 BLUE OAKS BLVD. SUITE 110
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747
PHONE: (916) 788-4456
19-020 - SHEET 1 of 1

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 29, 2022
80400 20
SCALE: 1"=40'
NORTH
SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
Curbing Exhibit for:

J:\Projects\Sunridge\19-020 Sunridge Village 4\Exhibits\CURB EXHIBIT.dwg, 8/29/2022 10:11 AM LEGEND:

PROPOSED VERTICAL CURB & GUTTER

DRIVEWAY CURB CUT
*
* * * *
*
*
* * *
*
****
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 213 of 600 ends

23 24 27
31 32
333029
2622
66 67 68 69
62636465
56 55
57 54 53
58 59
52 34
47 48 49 50
4546
6 53 42
25 28
1 35
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 51
60 61
70 71
44 CANYONLANDS DRIVE

COBBLE BROOK DRIVE

ALLEY F ALLEY G

ALLEY D ALLEY E

AURA WAY

HETCH HECHY DRIVE

AURA WAY

DOUGLAS ROAD

ALLEY A ALLEY B ALLEY C

AUDRIS WAY

HETCH HECHY DRIVE

SEE DETAIL
(OLD ALLEY J)
1'

TRASH ESMT
4'

SETBACK

BUILDING

ENVELOPE
3'

BUILDING

DRIVEWAY
1'

TRASH ESMT

ALLEY G

CIVIL ENGINEERS

SURVEYORS
PLANNERSmsa
cbgA company
MSA ENGINEERING INC.
1430 BLUE OAKS BLVD. SUITE 110
ROSEVILLE, CA 95747
PHONE: (916) 788-4456
19-020 - SHEET 1 of 1

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA
AUGUST 29, 2022
80400 20
SCALE: 1"=40'
NORTH
SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
Trash Storage Exhibit for:

J:\Projects\Sunridge\19-020 Sunridge Village 4\Exhibits\Trash Storage Exhibit.dwg, 8/29/2022 9:42 AM Scale: 1' = 10"

TRASH LOCATION DETAIL
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 214 of 600 ends

ALLEY A

ALLEY B

AURA WAY

CANYONLANDS DRIVE

AURA WAY

ALLEY DALLEY E

ALLEY C

ALLEY FALLEY G

HETCH HECHY DRIVE

COBBLE BROOK DRIVE

DOUGLAS ROAD

AUDRIS WAY
®

PLANT SCHEDULE
AUGUST 26, 2022
SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4

RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

PRELIMINARY STREET TREE PLAN

CRESLEIGH HOMES

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-BTel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767 Sacramento, CA 95816
1 OF 3

FUTURE PARK

EXISTING
VILLAGE 1
TREE PLANTING NOTE:
·TREES SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT VISION AT INTERSECTIONS OR ALLEYS, PURSUANT TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY STD. DRAWING 4-18
·TREES WILL BE SHIFTED AS NEEDED TO COMPLY WITH REQUIRED CLEARANCES.

P
NLA
ACSD
D
E

I TT E R

R ESEG TEE
A
R
CHI
NO. 3266
2 OHN
H.

N
CIC
S
OLAU
JRE
N
09 -2
0 -3
S
C
TTE
N
F
A
A
L
FO
OR
I
A
C
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 215 of 600 ends

1 2
3 4
5 6
7 7
8 9
10 11
12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23
24 25
26 27
28 AUGUST 26, 2022
SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4

RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS

CRESLEIGH HOMES
13 2*4*567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
*APPROVED FOR PLANTING IN COUNTY

RIGHTS-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC EASEMENTS
TREES
SHRUBS

GRASSES
PER IMPROVEMENTS STANDARDS, SECTION 4-32

GROUNDCOVER

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-BTel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767 Sacramento, CA 95816
SIZE
SIZE
SIZE
SIZE
2 OF 3
P
NLA
ACSD
D
E

I TT E R

R ESEG TEE
A
R
CHI
NO. 3266
2 OHN
H.

N
CIC
S
OLAU
JRE
N
09 -2
0 -3
S
C
TTE
N
F
A
A
L
FO
OR
I
A
C
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 216 of 600 ends

AUGUST 26, 2022
SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4

RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

CONCEPTUAL PRODUCTION LANDSCAPE PLANS

CRESLEIGH HOMES

BUILDING RELATIONSHIPS ONE PROJECT AT A TIME
3301 C St, Bldg. 100-BTel 916.341.7760
Fax 916.341.7767 Sacramento, CA 95816
3 OF 3
P
NLA
ACSD
D
E

I TT E R

R ESEG TEE
A
R
CHI
NO. 3266
2 OHN
H.

N
CIC
S
OLAU
JRE
N
09 -2
0 -3
S
C
TTE
N
F
A
A
L
FO
OR
I
A
C

1.ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL UTILIZE LOW AND MEDIUM WATER USE PLANT MATERIAL AND LIMIT HIGH WATER USE PLANT MATERIAL.

2.ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE A 3" LAYER OF BARK MULCH. INSTALL WEED CONTROL LAYER IN ALL BARK MULCH AREAS.

3.IRRIGATION DESIGN SHALL COMPLY WITH THE MODEL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE.

ALL NECESSARY DOCUMENTATION INCLUDING WATER CALCULATIONS AND CERTIFICATES SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH THE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL.

4.IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL CONSIST OF LOW FLOW ROTARY SPRAY NOZZLE TECHNOLOGY, POINT

SOURCE BUBBLERS AND/OR DRIP EMITTERS SYSTEM CONTROLLED BY AN AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION CONTROLLER USING ET DATA SCHEDULING AND RAIN SENSOR SHUT-OFF CAPABILITIES.

5.A PRE-EMERGENT SHALL BE APPLIED IN ALL NON-SEEDED LANDSCAPED AREAS.

6.ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR ALL TREES PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF PAVING OR HARDSCAPE.

7.A 25% MINIMUM OF ALL PROPOSED TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE A 24" BOX CONTAINER SIZE.

8.A 30% MINIMUM OF ALL PROPOSED TREES ARE REQUIRED TO BE EVERGREEN.

9.SHRUBS AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE PAVEMENT GRADE WITHIN CLEAR SIGHT TRIANGLES, PURSUANT TO SACRAMENTO COUNTY STD. DRAWING 4-18.

LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 217 of 600 ends

CORNER WINDOW"PARAPET" BLADE WALL

STUCCO WITH REVEAL

STYLE NARRATIVE
Inspired by homes throughout Daly City, the
"SKYLINE" is a contemporary style featuring
low-pitched shed roofs, asymmetric corner
windows, bracket awnings, and all-stucco
facade. Accent stucco areas include an
aluminum channel reveal to create a modern
"paneled look" highlighted with a bright,
playful color palette.

ROOF DETAILS
GABLE + ACCENT SHED ROOF
ROOF PITCH (Main) = 6:12
ROOF PITCH (Shed) = 2:12
EAVE DIMENSION = 24"
RAKE DIMENSION = 6" & 24”

MATERIALS
STUCCO

STUCCO WITH CHANNEL REVEAL

WOOD (OR FOAM) DETAILS

COMPOSITION ROOFING

COLUMNSSTEEP PITCH GABLE

VERTICAL SIDING

STYLE NARRATIVE
The "PARK MANOR" is a modern
interpretation of the classic farmhouse with a
combination of steep-pitched gables and low-
pitched shed roofs. Accent & panel areas
feature vertical siding with a rich, natural color
scheme. Metal awnings with corrugated metal
rooﬁng add a contemporary edge and
additional shadow and deﬁnition to the
facade.

ROOF DETAILS
SHED + ACCENT GABLE ROOF
ROOF PITCH (Main) = 6:12
ROOF PITCH (Gable) = 12:12
ROOF PITCH (Shed) = 3:12
EAVE DIMENSION = 12” & 24"
RAKE DIMENSION = 12”

MATERIALS
STUCCO
VERTICAL PANEL SIDING (6" Exposure)

METAL DETAILS

COMPOSITION ROOFING

STYLE NARRATIVE
Bold, geometric lines and simple massing
are key elements of the "MAYFAIR" style.

Hip roofs with deep, sofﬁtted overhangs,
large corner windows, accent horizontal
siding and paneling, and modern garage &
entry doors create a fresh look. Bold color
schemes with bright accent colors complete
the style.

ROOF DETAILS

HIP ROOF
ROOF PITCH (Main) = 6:12
EAVE (SOFFIT) DIMENSION = 24"
RAKE DIMENSION = 12"

MATERIALS
STUCCO
HORIZONTAL LAP SIDING (8" Exposure)

HARDIE PANELS WITH TRIM BOARDS

WOOD (OR FOAM) DETAILS

COMPOSITION ROOFING
CORNER WINDOW"PARAPET" BLADE WALL

BRACKETS / CORBELS
© 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE
SCHEMATIC STREET SCENE + ELEVATION STYLE GUIDE
/Volumes/jdaarch (3)/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 Layout/20086_A0_STREET SCENE_24x36L 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 218 of 600 ends

37' 0"
39' 0"
21' 0" 7' 6" 8' 6"
44' 6"
44' 0"
5' 0"
37' 0"
45' 0"
69' 0"
4' 0" 37' 0" 4' 0"
8' 0"43' 0"5' 6"12' 6"
45' 0"
65' 0"
4' 0" 37' 0" 4' 0"
8' 0"39' 0"10' 0"8' 0"
© 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A1.1CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

LOT DIAGRAM
(STREET FRONTAGE LOTS)
2-CAR
GARAGE
208x 213
BR. 3
105x 109
UP
GREAT
151x 246
REF.

DW
POCKET
OFFICE
77x 100
PORCH

UPPER FLOOR

UPPER FLOOR
794.89 ft²

PROGRAM
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 3
BATHROOMS = 3
GARAGE = 2 - CAR

KITCHEN / GREAT ROOM

LAUNDRY

POCKET OFFICE
AREA CALCS (Building Total)
LIVING (Conditioned) = 1,832.26 SF
GARAGE = 452.38 SF
PORCH / PATIO = 105.25 SF
LOT COVERAGE = 59.8%

SHEET NOTESUPPER FLOOR AREAMAIN FLOOR AREA

CONDITIONED
SPACE

UNCONDITIONED
SPACE
1037.37 ft²
452.38 ft²

37.5 ft²
(VOLUME

CEILING)

ALTERNATE GREAT ROOM LAYOUT
(ALT. KITCHEN + LIVING LOCATIONS)
GREAT
230x 166
K.

P. REF.

COURTYARD OPTION
(AT ENHANCED ELEVATIONS)

COURTYARD

SGDGREAT

LOT DIAGRAM
(ALLEY FRONTAGE LOTS)

SEE LOT DIAGRAM FOR

SETBACK INFORMATION
PLAN 1 | SCHEMATIC FIRST FLOOR PLAN - 1,832 SF
/Users/jballa/Library/CloudStorage/Egnyte-jdaarch/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 Layout/20086_A1_PLAN 1_24x36L 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 219 of 600 ends

21' 6 1/2"
10' 0"
37' 0"
10' 0"
21' 0" 16' 0"
5' 8 1/2" 33' 3 1/2"
49' 0"
49' 0"
37' 0"
17' 5 1/2"
© 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A1.2CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

PRIMARY
SUITE
129x 166
LINEN
D
W
LAU.

W.I.C.
12 LF
LOW
WALL

OPEN TO
BELOW
794.89 ft²

PROGRAM
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 3
BATHROOMS = 3
GARAGE = 2 - CAR

KITCHEN / GREAT ROOM

LAUNDRY

POCKET OFFICE
AREA CALCS (Building Total)
LIVING (Conditioned) = 1,832.26 SF
GARAGE = 452.38 SF
PORCH / PATIO = 105.25 SF
LOT COVERAGE = 59.8%

SHEET NOTESUPPER FLOOR AREAMAIN FLOOR AREA

CONDITIONED
SPACE

UNCONDITIONED
SPACE
1037.37 ft²
452.38 ft²

37.5 ft²
PLAN 1 | SCHEMATIC SECOND FLOOR PLAN - 1,832 SF
/Users/jballa/Library/CloudStorage/Egnyte-jdaarch/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 Layout/20086_A1_PLAN 1_24x36L 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 220 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A1.3CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 221 of 600 ends

PLAN 1
SQUARE FOOTAGE = 1,832 SF
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 3
BATHROOMS = 3

MATERIALS
STUCCO

SAND FINISH

STUCCO W/ CHANNEL REVEAL

SAND FINISH
1" ALUMINUM CHANNEL

COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF

CERTAINTEED (OR SIMILAR)

COLOR SCHEME
"SKYLINE" | SCHEME 1

SHEET NOTES
ROOF
TRIM /
FACIA
MAIN
BODY
ACCENT
BODY

STUCCO W/

CHANNEL
REVEAL
ENTRY
DOOR
1 2
3 © 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A1.4CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

TOP OF RIDGE
24’-4” a.f.f.

TOP OF RIDGE

LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION
PLAN 1 | SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS - "SKYLINE"
6' 0"
FENCE
6’ TALL

TRIM AND ACCENT STUCCO ON SIDE AND REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS

TRIM AND ACCENT STUCCO ON SIDE AND REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 222 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A1.5CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 223 of 600 ends

SHEET NOTES
ROOF
TRIM /
FACIA
MAIN
BODY
ACCENT
BODY

HORIZONTAL
SIDING
ENTRY
DOOR
1 2
3 © 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A1.6CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

TOP OF RIDGE
24’-9” a.f.f.

TOP OF RIDGE

LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION
PLAN 1 | SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS - "MAYFAIR"
PLAN 1
SQUARE FOOTAGE = 1,832 SF
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 3
BATHROOMS = 3

MATERIALS
STUCCO

SAND FINISH

ACCENT SIDING

HARDIEPLANK, HORIZONTAL
SIDING 8" EXPOSURE

COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF

CERTAINTEED (OR SIMILAR)

COLOR SCHEME
"MAYFAIR" | SCHEME 4
6' 0"
FENCE
6’ TALL

TRIM AND ACCENT STUCCO ON SIDE AND REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS

TRIM AND ACCENT STUCCO ON SIDE AND REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 224 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A1.7CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 225 of 600 ends

SHEET NOTES

ROOF FASCIA
MAIN
BODY
ACCENT
BODY
ENTRY
DOOR

GARAGE/
TRIM
1 2
3 VERTICAL
SIDING
© 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A1.8CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

TOP OF RIDGE
28’-9” a.f.f.

TOP OF RIDGE

LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION
PLAN 1 | SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS - "PARK MANOR"
PLAN 1
SQUARE FOOTAGE = 1,832 SF
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 3
BATHROOMS = 3

MATERIALS
STUCCO

SAND FINISH

ACCENT SIDING

HARDIEPLANK, VERTICAL SIDING
6" EXPOSURE

COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF

CERTAINTEED (OR SIMILAR)

COLOR SCHEME
"PARK MANOR" | SCHEME 8
6' 0"
FENCE
6’ TALL

TRIM AND ACCENT STUCCO ON SIDE AND REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS

TRIM AND ACCENT STUCCO ON SIDE AND REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 226 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A1.9CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

COURTYARD
4’ TALL

COURTYARD
4’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 227 of 600 ends

45' 0"
4' 0" 37' 0" 4' 0"
39' 0"9' 6"12' 6"
69' 0"
8' 0"
45' 0"
4' 0" 37' 0" 4' 0"
39' 0"10' 0"8' 0"
65' 0"
8' 0"
37' 0"
48' 6"
48' 6"
9' 6" 39' 0"
20' 5 1/2" 16' 6 1/2"
37' 0"
6"
© 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A2.1CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

PROGRAM
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 3 - 4
BATHROOMS = 2.5 - 3
GARAGE = 2 - CAR

KITCHEN / GREAT ROOM

LAUNDRY
DEN
(OPT. BR. 4 + FULL BATH)
AREA CALCS (Building Total)
LIVING (Conditioned) = 2,206.29 SF
GARAGE = 418.54 SF
PORCH / PATIO = 38.14 SF
LOT COVERAGE = 54.7%

SHEET NOTESUPPER FLOOR AREAMAIN FLOOR AREA

CONDITIONED
SPACE

UNCONDITIONED
SPACE
1143.46 ft²
418.54 ft²

38.14 ft²
BR. 4 OPTION
(IN LIEU OF DEN + PWD)
2-CAR
GARAGE
202x 202
UP
GREAT
251x 189
REF. PANTRY
DW

UPPER FLOOR

UPPER FLOOR
PWD.

DEN
102x 147
PORCH
LINEN
BR. 4
102x 110
W.I.C.
79 LF

LOT DIAGRAM
(STREET FRONTAGE LOTS)
COFFEE
BAR

COURTYARD OPTION
(AT ENHANCED ELEVATIONS)

COURTYARD
DEN
102x 147

LOT DIAGRAM
(ALLEY FRONTAGE LOTS)

SEE LOT DIAGRAM FOR

SETBACK INFORMATION
PLAN 2 | SCHEMATIC FIRST FLOOR PLAN - 2,206 SF
/Users/jballa/Library/CloudStorage/Egnyte-jdaarch/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 228 of 600 ends

20' 5 1/2"
37' 0"
48' 6"
48' 6"
9' 6" 39' 0"
5' 5" 11' 1 1/2"
37' 0"
© 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A2.2CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

LOW LINEN /

WINDOW SEAT
LOW
WALL
OPT. BONUS
(+396 SF)
1062.83 ft²

PROGRAM
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 3 - 4
BATHROOMS = 2.5 - 3
GARAGE = 2 - CAR

KITCHEN / GREAT ROOM

LAUNDRY
DEN
(OPT. BR. 4 + FULL BATH)
AREA CALCS (Building Total)
LIVING (Conditioned) = 2,206.29 SF
GARAGE = 418.54 SF
PORCH / PATIO = 38.14 SF
LOT COVERAGE = 54.7%

SHEET NOTESUPPER FLOOR AREAMAIN FLOOR AREA

CONDITIONED
SPACE

UNCONDITIONED
SPACE
1143.46 ft²
418.54 ft²

38.14 ft²
W.I.C.
176 LF
BR. 3
110x 101
(OPT. BARN DOOR)LINEN

PRIMARY
SUITE
1410x 120
LAU.

W. D.

PLAN 2 | SCHEMATIC SECOND FLOOR PLAN - 2,206 SF
/Users/jballa/Library/CloudStorage/Egnyte-jdaarch/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 229 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A2.3CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 230 of 600 ends

SHEET NOTES
ROOF
TRIM /
FACIA
MAIN
BODY
ACCENT
BODY
STUCCO

W/CHANNEL
ENTRY
DOOR
1 2
3 PLAN 2
SQUARE FOOTAGE = 2,206 SF
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 3 - 4
BATHROOMS = 2.5 - 3

MATERIALS
STUCCO

SAND FINISH

STUCCO W/ CHANNEL REVEAL

SAND FINISH
1" ALUMINUM CHANNEL

COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF

CERTAINTEED (OR SIMILAR)

COLOR SCHEME
"SKYLINE" | SCHEME 2
© 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A2.4CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

TOP OF RIDGE
24’-10” a.f.f.

TOP OF RIDGE

LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION
PLAN 2 | SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS - "SKYLINE"
6' 0"
FENCE
6’ TALL

TRIM AND ACCENT STUCCO ON SIDE AND REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS

TRIM AND ACCENT STUCCO ON SIDE AND REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 231 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A2.5CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 232 of 600 ends

SHEET NOTES
ROOF
TRIM /
FACIA
MAIN
BODY
ACCENT
BODY

HORIZONTAL
SIDING
ENTRY
DOOR
1 2
3 © 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A2.6CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

TOP OF RIDGE
26’-4” a.f.f.

TOP OF RIDGE

LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION
PLAN 2 | SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS - "MAYFAIR"
PLAN 2
SQUARE FOOTAGE = 2,206 SF
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 3 - 4
BATHROOMS = 2.5 - 3

MATERIALS
STUCCO

SAND FINISH

ACCENT SIDING

HARDIEPLANK, HORIZONTAL
SIDING 8" EXPOSURE

COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF

CERTAINTEED (OR SIMILAR)

COLOR SCHEME
"MAYFAIR" | SCHEME 5
6' 0"
FENCE
6’ TALL

TRIM AND HORIZONTAL SIDING ON REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 233 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A2.7CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 234 of 600 ends

PLAN 2
SQUARE FOOTAGE = 2,206 SF
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 3 - 4
BATHROOMS = 2.5 - 3

MATERIALS
STUCCO

SAND FINISH

ACCENT SIDING

HARDIEPLANK, VERTICAL SIDING
6" EXPOSURE

COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF

CERTAINTEED (OR SIMILAR)

COLOR SCHEME
"PARK MANOR" | SCHEME 8

SHEET NOTES
ROOF
TRIM /
FACIA
MAIN
BODY
ACCENT
BODY
ACCENT
SIDING
ENTRY
DOOR
1 2
3 © 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A2.8CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

TOP OF RIDGE
26’-6” a.f.f.

TOP OF RIDGE

LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION
PLAN 2 | SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS - "PARK MANOR"
6' 0"
FENCE
6’ TALL

TRIM AND VERTICAL SIDING ON REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS
FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 235 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A2.9CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

COURTYARD
4’ TALL

COURTYARD
4’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 236 of 600 ends

BARN DOOR
45' 0"
4' 0" 37' 0" 4' 0"
43' 0"5' 6"12' 6"
69' 0"
8' 0"
45' 0"
4' 0" 37' 0" 4' 0"
39' 0"10' 0"8' 0"
65' 0"
8' 0"
37' 0"
45' 2"
45' 2"
1' 0" 5' 2" 39' 0"
20' 7" 5' 3 1/2" 11' 1 1/2"
37' 0"
© 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A3.1CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

DEN/FAMILY ROOM OPTION
(IN LIEU OF ENLARGED GREAT ROOM)
2-CAR
GARAGE
203x 213
BR. 5
102x 126
UP
GREAT
206x 176
POCKET
OFFICE
80x 124
(OPT. BR. 5)
REF. PANTRY
DW

UPPER FLOOR

UPPER FLOOR
PWD.

DEN
115x 109
PORCH
OPT.

BOOKSHELVES /
WINE DISPLAY, ETC.

DOUBLE-SIDED

FIREPLACE

LOT DIAGRAM
(STREET FRONTAGE LOTS)
1443.67 ft²

PROGRAM
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 4 - 5 (OPT)
BATHROOMS = 2.5 - 3.5 (OPT.)
GARAGE = 2 - CAR

KITCHEN / GREAT ROOM
NOOK

LAUNDRY

POCKET OFFICE
LOFT

COVERED PATIO
(OPT. BR. 5 SUITE)
(OPT. DEN)
AREA CALCS (Building Total)
LIVING (Conditioned) = 2,522.19 SF
GARAGE = 433.09 SF
PORCH / PATIO = 124.76 SF
LOT COVERAGE = 54.4%

SHEET NOTESUPPER FLOOR AREAMAIN FLOOR AREA

CONDITIONED
SPACE

UNCONDITIONED
SPACE
1078.52 ft²
433.09 ft²

24.76 ft²
W.I.C.
8 LF
UP
E.

PORCH
REF.

PANTRY

STOP & DROP

COURTYARD OPTION
(AT ENHANCED ELEVATIONS)

COURTYARD
POCKET
OFFICE
80x 124

LOT DIAGRAM
(ALLEY FRONTAGE LOTS)

SEE LOT DIAGRAM FOR

SETBACK INFORMATION
PLAN 3 | SCHEMATIC FIRST FLOOR PLAN - 2,522 SF
/Users/jballa/Library/CloudStorage/Egnyte-jdaarch/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 Layout/20086_A3_PLAN 3_24x36L 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 237 of 600 ends

12' 3"
37' 0"
45' 2"
45' 2"
4' 8" 40' 6"
13' 7 1/2" 11' 1 1/2"
37' 0"
© 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A3.2CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

PRIMARY
SUITE
178x 150
(OPT. BUILT-INS)
D.

W.I.C.
320 LF
W.I.C.
103 LF
W.I.C.
10 LF
BR. 2
102x 102
BR. 3
114x 124
BR. 4
104x 133
LOFT
113x 99
LAU.
(OPT. SINK)
(OPT. BARN DOOR)
LINEN
1443.67 ft²

PROGRAM
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 4 - 5 (OPT)
BATHROOMS = 2.5 - 3.5 (OPT.)
GARAGE = 2 - CAR

KITCHEN / GREAT ROOM
NOOK

LAUNDRY

POCKET OFFICE
LOFT

COVERED PATIO
(OPT. BR. 5 SUITE)
(OPT. DEN)
AREA CALCS (Building Total)
LIVING (Conditioned) = 2,497.19 SF
GARAGE = 433.09 SF
PORCH / PATIO = 124.76 SF
LOT COVERAGE = 54.4%

SHEET NOTESUPPER FLOOR AREAMAIN FLOOR AREA

CONDITIONED
SPACE

UNCONDITIONED
SPACE
1078.52 ft²
<FaceArea>
433.09 ft²

24.76 ft²
PLAN 3 | SCHEMATIC SECOND FLOOR PLAN - 2,522 SF
/Users/jballa/Library/CloudStorage/Egnyte-jdaarch/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 Layout/20086_A3_PLAN 3_24x36L 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 238 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A3.3CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

06.17.2022 | PROGRESS SET
5905 GRANITE LAKE DRIVE | GRANITE BAY | CALIFORNIA, 95746 | 916.783.3700 | WWW.JDAARCH.COM JD+A JOB NUMBER: 20086
DATE: 06.17.2022
PLAN 3 | SCHEMATIC PERSPECTIVE - "SKYLINE"
/Volumes/jdaarch (3)/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 Layout/20086_A3_PLAN 3_24x36L 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 239 of 600 ends

PLAN 3
SQUARE FOOTAGE = 2,522 SF
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 4 - 5
BATHROOMS = 3.5 - 4.5

MATERIALS
STUCCO

SAND FINISH

STUCCO W/ CHANNEL REVEAL

SAND FINISH
1" ALUMINUM CHANNEL

COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF

CERTAINTEED (OR SIMILAR)

COLOR SCHEME
"SKYLINE" | SCHEME 3

SHEET NOTES
ROOF
TRIM /
FACIA
MAIN
BODY
ACCENT
BODY
STUCCO

W/CHANNEL
REVEAL
ENTRY
DOOR
1 2
3 © 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A3.4CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

TOP OF RIDGE
28’-10” a.f.f.

TOP OF RIDGE

LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION
PLAN 3 | SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS - "SKYLINE"
6' 0"
FENCE
6’ TALL

TRIM AND ACCENT STUCCO ON SIDE AND REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS

TRIM AND ACCENT STUCCO ON SIDE AND REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
/Volumes/jdaarch (3)/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 Layout/20086_A3_PLAN 3_24x36L 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 240 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A3.5CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 241 of 600 ends

PLAN 3
SQUARE FOOTAGE = 2,522 SF
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 4 - 5
BATHROOMS = 3.5 - 4.5

MATERIALS
STUCCO

SAND FINISH

ACCENT SIDING

HARDIEPLANK, HORIZONTAL
SIDING 8" EXPOSURE

COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF

CERTAINTEED (OR SIMILAR)

COLOR SCHEME
"MAYFAIR" | SCHEME 6

SHEET NOTES
ROOF
TRIM /
FACIA
MAIN
BODY
ACCENT
BODY

HORIZONTAL
SIDING
ENTRY
DOOR
1 2
3 © 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A3.6CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION
1 23
27’-11” a.f.f.

TOP OF RIDGE
27’-11” a.f.f.

TOP OF RIDGE
PLAN 3 | SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS - "MAYFAIR"
6' 0"
FENCE
6’ TALL

TRIM AND HORIZONTAL SIDING ON REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
/Volumes/jdaarch (3)/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 Layout/20086_A3_PLAN 3_24x36L 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 242 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A3.7CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

06.17.2022 | PROGRESS SET
5905 GRANITE LAKE DRIVE | GRANITE BAY | CALIFORNIA, 95746 | 916.783.3700 | WWW.JDAARCH.COM JD+A JOB NUMBER: 20086
DATE: 06.17.2022
PLAN 3 | SCHEMATIC PERSPECTIVE - "PARK MANOR"
/Volumes/jdaarch (3)/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 Layout/20086_A3_PLAN 3_24x36L 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 243 of 600 ends

SHEET NOTES
ROOF
TRIM /
FACIA
MAIN
BODY
ACCENT
BODY

VERTICAL
SIDING
ENTRY
DOOR
1 2
3 PLAN 3
SQUARE FOOTAGE = 2,522 SF
STORIES = 2
BEDROOMS = 4 - 5
BATHROOMS = 3.5 - 4.5

MATERIALS
STUCCO
SMOOTH FINISH, 3-COAT

ACCENT SIDING

HARDIEPLANK, VERTICAL SIDING
6" EXPOSURE

COMPOSITION SHINGLE ROOF

CERTAINTEED (OR SIMILAR)

COLOR SCHEME
"PARK MANOR" | SCHEME 9
© 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A3.8CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

LEFT ELEVATION REAR ELEVATION

RIGHT ELEVATION FRONT ELEVATION
1 32
29’-10” a.f.f.

TOP OF RIDGE
29’-10” a.f.f.

TOP OF RIDGE
PLAN 3 | SCHEMATIC ELEVATIONS - "PARK MANOR"
6' 0"
FENCE
6’ TALL

TRIM AND VERTICAL SIDING ON SIDE AND REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS

TRIM AND VERTICAL SIDING ON SIDE AND REAR ONLY AT ENHANCED LOTS FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
/Volumes/jdaarch (3)/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 Layout/20086_A3_PLAN 3_24x36L 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 244 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A3.9CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

COURTYARD
4’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL
/Volumes/jdaarch (3)/Shared/02 PROJECTS/CRESLEIGH HOMES/20086 SUNRIDGE V4/01 DESIGN/03 SketchUp/02 Layout/20086_A3_PLAN 3_24x36L 0 2 4 8
SCALE: 1/4” = 1’-0”
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 245 of 600 ends

*
* * * *
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
* *
* *
*
*

ENHANCED LOT LOCATIONS
*
* *
© 2004 - 2020 JEFFREY DEMURE + ASSOCIATES ARCHITECTS PLANNERS, INC.

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A4.1CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

ENHANCED SIDE CONDITIONS EXHIBIT

COURTYARD
4’ TALL
FENCE
6’ TALL

COURTYARD
4’ TALL
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 246 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A5.1CITY OF RANCH CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

ROOF SHINGLE BY CERTAINTEED
GOSSAMER VEIL | SW 9165

STUCCO BODY
EXTRA WHITE | SW 7006

FASCIA, GARAGE, TRIM
SPALDING GRAY | SW 6074

ACCENT BODY
BOSC PEAR | SW 6390

ENTRY DOOR
BLACKBERRY | SW 7577

STUCCO WITH CHANNEL
SCHEME 2
GEORGETOWN GRAY | LANDMARK SOLARIS

ROOF SHINGLE BY CERTAINTEED
EXTRA WHITE | SW 7006

STUCCO BODY
CYBERSPACE | SW 7076

FASCIA, GARAGE, TRIM
SKYLINE STEEL | SW 1015

ACCENT BODY
WATERLOO | SW 9141

ENTRY DOOR
COPPER WIRE | SW 7707

STUCCO WITH CHANNEL
SCHEME 3
AGED CEDAR | LANDMARK SOLARIS

ROOF SHINGLE BY CERTAINTEED
AESTHETIC WHITE | SW 7035

STUCCO BODY
URBAN BRONZE | SW 7043

FASCIA, GARAGE, TRIM
STICKS AND STONES | SW 7503

ACCENT BODY
FIRED BRICK | SW 6335

ENTRY DOOR
ROJO MARRON | SW 9182

STUCCO WITH CHANNEL

COLOR DETAILS
PAINT: Sherwin Williams
ACCENT SIDING: James Hardie

SHEET NOTES
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 247 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A5.2CITY OF RANCH CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

ROOF SHINGLE BY CERTAINTEED
WORLDLY GRAY | SW 7043

STUCCO BODY
CHATEAU BROWN | SW 7510

FASCIA, GARAGE, TRIM
GAUNTLET GRAY| SW 7019

ACCENT BODY
DEEP SEA DIVE | SW 7618

ENTRY DOOR
BLACKBERRY | SW 7577

HORIZONTAL SIDING
SCHEME 5
CRYSTAL GRAY | LANDMARK SOLARIS

ROOF SHINGLE BY CERTAINTEED
FUNCTIONAL GRAY | SW 7024

STUCCO BODY
ICE BLUE | SW 6252

FASCIA, GARAGE, TRIM
SHOJI WHITE | SW 7042

ACCENT BODY
TOILE RED | SW 0006

ENTRY DOOR
GRIFFIN | SW 7026

HORIZONTAL SIDING
SCHEME 6
AGED CEDAR | LANDMARK SOLARIS

ROOF SHINGLE BY CERTAINTEED
OLYMPUS WHITE | SW 6253

STUCCO BODY
ICE BLUE | SW 6252

FASCIA, GARAGE, TRIM
MORNING FOG | SW 7503

ACCENT BODY
BAKED COOKIE | SW 9098

ENTRY DOOR
SEA SERPENT | SW 7615

HORIZONTAL SIDING

COLOR DETAILS
PAINT: Sherwin Williams
ACCENT SIDING: James Hardie

SHEET NOTES
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 248 of 600 ends

SUNRIDGE VILLAGE 4
A5.3CITY OF RANCH CORDOVA, CALIFORNIA

ROOF SHINGLE BY CERTAINTEED
SEAL SKIN | SW 7675
FASCIA
SNOWBOUND | SW 7004

GARAGE, TRIM
DEEPEST MAUVE | SW 6060

ENTRY DOOR
MOROCCAN BROWN | SW 0005

VERTICAL SIDING
SCHEME 8
WEATHERED WOOD | LANDMARK SOLARIS

ROOF SHINGLE BY CERTAINTEED
SHOJI WHITE | SW 7042

STUCCO BODY
ANDIRON | SW 6174

FASCIA, GARAGE, TRIM
FELTED WOOL | SW 9171

ACCENT BODY
GRANITE PEAK | SW 6250

ENTRY DOOR
RAISEN | SW 7630

VERTICAL SIDING
SCHEME 9
GEORGETOWN GRAY | LANDMARK SOLARIS

ROOF SHINGLE BY CERTAINTEED
ROYCROFT MIST GRAY | SW 2844

STUCCO BODY
TRICORN BLACK | SW 6258

FASCIA, GARAGE, TRIM
GRIZZLE GRAY | SW 7068

ACCENT BODY
ARTIFACT | SW 6138

ENTRY DOOR
MOUNT ETNA | SW 7625

VERTICAL SIDING
RENWICK BEIGE | SW 2805

STUCCO BODY
GRIFFIN | SW 7026

ACCENT BODY

COLOR DETAILS
PAINT: Sherwin Williams
ACCENT SIDING: James Hardie

SHEET NOTES
ITEM 10.3.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 249 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 1 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Ongoing

1. The approved entitlement is for a Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Map (SLTSM) and Special Development
Permit for the Sunridge Lot J Village 4, APN: 067-
1060-004-0000, as described in the City Council staff
report dated September 6, 2022 and subject to the
conditions of approval herein, for project number
DD10028. These master conditions of approval are
applicable to this entitlement for a Small Lot Tentative Subdivision Lot and Special Development Permit.

Project Description On-Going Planning

2. The Applicant shall hold harmless the City, its Council Members, its officers, agents, employees, and
representatives from liability for any award, damages,
costs and fees incurred by the City and/or awarded to
any plaintiff in an action challenging the validity of this permit or any environmental or other documentation
related to approval of this permit. Applicant further
agrees to provide a defense for the City in any such
action.

General On-Going Planning

3. The applicant shall comply with the Sunridge Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Reporting Plan (MMRP)
and the 2006 approved Sunridge Lot J Mitigated
Negative Declaration.

Environmental On-Going Planning

4. The SLTSM and Special Development Permit
approval is valid for three years from the date of City approval, unless an extension of time is subsequently
approved per Government Code Section (66452.6e),
or as otherwise stated in the Project Development
Agreement.

Time/Expiration On-Going Planning

5. Conditions of approval for Sunridge Lot J dated
4/17/2006 remain in effect and are incorporated
herein by reference.

Original Conditions On-Going Public Works/
Planning

6. Applicant/Developer shall not carry a negative
account balance with the City for the processing of
the project. If a negative account balance occurs, it
General On-Going Planning

Page 250 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 2 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
will be the developer’s responsibility to pay the
balance due, in order to avoid delays in the
processing of future permits or recordation of maps.

Please e-mail the Finance Dept at
[email protected] for the status of
your account with the City.

7. Applicant shall be responsible for all damage to City streets associated with construction of the project and shall repair any damage as soon as possible.

Infrastructure On-Going Public Works

8. All storm drain facilities within private roads shall be privately maintained and shall be clearly labeled as
“private” in the improvement plans.

Storm Drainage On-Going Public Works

9. Applicant shall coordinate with the City’s Planning & Public Works Department to address the existing
homeowner’s timber fencing along the eastern project
boundary. Applicant will remove and replace existing
fencing and coordinate with homeowners for
scheduling and addressing any potential issues.

Applicant will not install double timber fencing along
the eastern project boundary that will create a space
or gap between the two adjacent properties.

Fencing On-Going, Prior to
approval of
Improvement Plans
Public Works and
Planning
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map or Small Lot Map

10. DRAINAGE STUDY:

Applicant shall prepare and submit a project specific
drainage study that includes, but not limited to: a pre- and post-project drainage analysis of the project and
project impacts, identification of off-site project
impacts or required offsite improvements, delineation
of existing and expected post project 100-year
floodplain, and identification of proposed connections
to the City’s storm drain system with adequate
supporting calculations. The study shall conform to
the requirements of the Sacramento City/County
Drainage Manual (Volume 2), County of Sacramento
Improvement Standards (Section 9), and all other
Drainage Study Prior to Recordation
of the
Subdivision Map
Public Works

Page 251 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 3 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
applicable standards. Study must be completed and
stamped by a Professional Engineer and determined
by the City to be accurate, and adequate.

11. Enter into a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and
provide a performance bond and labor and material
bond.

Funding Prior to Recordation
of the
Subdivision Map
Public Works

12. Prior to recordation of a final map or certificate of compliance, dedicate land or pay in lieu fees, or both, for park purposes, as required by and in accordance
with the procedures and standards set forth in
Chapter 22.40, Title 22 of the City of Rancho Cordova
Zoning Code
Fees Prior to Recordation
of the
Subdivision Map
Public Works

13. Dedicate public utility easements, for the installation and maintenance of water, gas, sewer, drainage
facilities, traffic control devices and dry utilities as shown on the tentative map.

Easements Prior to recordation
of the applicable small
lot final map
Public Works

14. The final map shall show easements or other mapped
provisions for the placement of centralized mail
delivery units.

Easements Prior to Recordation
of the
Subdivision Map
Public Works

15. Dedicate to the City all the right-of-ways as shown on the Tentative Map and install or bond for public street improvements, consistent with the City adopted cross
sections to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Dedication Prior to Recordation
of the
Subdivision Map
Public Works

16. Dedicate a standard 12.5-foot public utility easement, or smaller to the satisfaction of SMUD, for
underground facilities and appurtenances adjacent to
all public street rights of ways for all units that take front access. Alley loaded homes shall locate water
and sewer facilities to the satisfaction of CSD-1, Zone 40 and the City. Dry utilities shall be located to the satisfaction of SMUD, the other dry utility providers
and the City. Developer shall work with all utilities and the City to determine the best locations for all utilities, Infrastructure Prior to Recordation
of the
Subdivision Map
Public Works

Page 252 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 4 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
to the satisfaction of the Public Works Director.

Prior to Approval of Improvement Plans

17. Number, size, and location of driveways are subject to approval by the Public Works Department.

Infrastructure Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

18. Applicant shall photo-document the condition of
adjacent streets, sidewalks and infrastructure to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Infrastructure Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

19. In cases where the roadway cross-sections are
phased, extend all utilities beyond edge of pavement
to future roadway build out.

Infrastructure Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

20. Enter into a frontage agreement and bond for
construction of public improvements per the approved
Public Works plans to the satisfaction of the Public
Works Department.

Infrastructure Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

21. A final landscape plan shall be submitted in
conjunction with improvement plan and or building
permit submittal and approved by the planning and
public works departments prior to issuance of permits
and/or any installation of landscape materials RCMC

23.716.020. The final landscape planting and
irrigation plan shall be prepared by a registered
licensed landscape architect and include the following
items per RCMC 22.180.060:
Planting plan to scale that indicate slope
Irrigation Plan
Soils Test
Water Use Calculations
Irrigation Schedule
Permeability test for LID facilities’ locations
Soil media specifications (LID features)
Landscape Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

22. Traffic control devices shall be designed where
needed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Traffic control locations will be determined at time of improvement plan submittal.

Traffic Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

Page 253 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 5 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring

23. All landscape strips, medians, etc. that contain trees shall be designed to include continuous root barriers.

Infrastructure Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

24. All landscape corridor walls shall be designed of
masonry construction using graffiti resistant materials.

Wall design and materials shall be subject to City’s
approval and according to the design standards in the
Sunridge Specific Plan.

Infrastructure Walls Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

25. All new structures shall be protected from the 100- year (1 percent) flood event. Certified pad elevations
(certified by a registered Civil Engineer or licensed
Land Surveyor) shall be set at least one and two
tenths foot (1.2') above all sources of 100-year
flooding.

Flood Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

26. Stormwater Quality- Post Construction
The improvement plans shall incorporate all
applicable post construction stormwater quality
measures; including source control (loading docks,
waste management areas), treatment control,
hydromodification management, low impact
development, and full capture trash control measures
into the site improvement plans in conformance with
the most recent version of the Stormwater Quality
Design Manual for the Sacramento Region. The
applicant shall prepare and submit a Post-
Construction Stormwater Quality Control Plan that
includes details and sizing calculations of all the
proposed post construction stormwater quality
measures. In addition, a maintenance covenant is
required for all proposed post construction
stormwater quality measures, as detailed in Appendix
B of the Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the
Sacramento Region.

Stormwater Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

27. Stormwater Quality– During Construction: Stormwater Prior to approval of Public Works

Page 254 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 6 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
SWPPP- the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to be executed
through all phases of grading and project
construction. These measures shall be consistent
with the City’s Improvement Standards and Land
Grading and Erosion Control Ordinance.

General Construction Permit –
The project applicant shall file a Notice of Intent (NOI) to obtain coverage under the Statewide Construction
General Permit. Permits are issued by the State
Water Resources Control Board.
improvement plans

28. Fees:

Pay any fees required by the City’s Drainage Impact
Fee Program.

Fees Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

29. If applicable- the improvement plans shall provide
fencing around basins as required by City of Rancho
Cordova Drainage Maintenance and Planning staff.

Basin Fencing Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

30. Provide a permanent concrete stamp, or other
permanently applied message to the satisfaction of
the City not including paint, which reads “No
Dumping-Flows to Creek” or other approved message
at each storm drain inlet.

Infrastructure Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

31. The Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan in place for the site shall include a contingency plan for the
implementation of a process to remove fine clay
sediments prior to discharge to The City of Rancho
Cordova’s storm drain system and/or Waters of the
State (e.g., creeks, rivers) to the satisfaction of the City of Rancho Cordova. A polymer treatment
system or comparable process shall be designed in
the erosion and sediment control plan of the
improvement plans. This system shall be
implemented by qualified professionals with training
and proven experience in this field. Such treatment
shall be accomplished in a manner that does not
Stormwater Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

Page 255 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 7 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
pose a toxic threat to fish and other aquatic
organisms in receiving waters.

32. If applicable- all stormwater basins shall be designed with a natural appearance including meandering non-
linear side slopes and include amenities such as trails and landscaping in accordance with the City’s Open
Space Guidelines. The basin side slopes shall be 3:1
max.

Stormwater Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

33. Drainage System Design:

The drainage system shall be designed in
accordance with the approved Drainage Study to
accommodate runoff from the ultimate development
and shall meet the City of Rancho Cordova’s
Improvement Standards, Construction Specifications,
and Floodplain Management Ordinances in effect at
the time of improvement plans approval.

Drainage Prior to approval of
improvement plans
Public Works

34. The applicant shall coordinate with Sacramento Area Sewer District:

a. To obtain sewer service, construction of
SASD sewer infrastructure will be required.

Current SASD Standards and Specifications
apply to any offsite or onsite public sewer
construction of modification. These
improvements must be shown on the plans.

Field modifications to new or existing precast
manhole bases are not allowed.
b. SASD requires each building on each lot with
a sewage source to have a separate
connection to SASD’s sewer system. If there
is more than one building in any single parcel
and the parcel is not proposed for split, then
each building on that parcel must have a
separate connection to a private onsite sewer
Sewer Prior to approval of
improvement plans SASD

Page 256 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 8 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
line or a separate connection to the SASD
public sewer line. These improvements must
be shown on the plans.
c. Alignment of all main lines and structures
must provide a minimum of 1-foot vertical
clearance and 5 feet horizontal clearance from
all other utilities and improvements. Sewer is
to be located a minimum of 10 feet (measured
horizontally) from any structure or footing.

Show public sanitary sewer and water supply
facilities in accordance with the Health and
Safety Code.

d. The project has an approved Level 3 sewer
study. Any changes to the study may require
an addendum.

35. The applicant/developer shall coordinate with SMUD
regarding easements and shall meet all applicable
SMUD requirements:
Structural setbacks less than 14-feet shall
require the applicant to conduct a pre-
engineering meeting with all utilities to ensure
property clearances are maintained.
Any necessary future SMUD facilities located
on the applicant’s property shall require a
dedicated SMUD easement. This will be
determined prior to SMUD performing work on
the applicant’s property.
In the event the applicant requires the
relocation or removal of existing SMUD
Utilities Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
and On-Going
SMUD

Page 257 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 9 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
facilities on or adjacent to the subject
property, the applicant shall coordinate with
SMUD. The applicant shall be responsible for
the cost of relocation or removal.
SMUD reserves the right to use any portion of
its easements on or adjacent to the subject
property that it reasonably needs and shall not
be responsible for any damages to the
developed property within said easement that
unreasonably interferes with those needs.
The applicant shall not place any building
foundations within 5 feet of any SMUD trench
to maintain adequate trench integrity. The
applicant shall verify specific clearance
requirements for other utilities.
In the event the City requires an Irrevocable
Offer for future roadway improvements, the
Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public
utility easement (PUE) for overhead and/or
underground facilities and appurtenances
adjacent to the City’s IOD.
The applicant shall comply with SMUD siting
requirements (e.g., panel size/location,
clearances from SMUD equipment,
transformer location, service conductors).

Information regarding SMUD siting
requirements can be found at:
https://www.smud.org/en/Business-Solutions-
and-Rebates/Design-and-Construction-
Services

Page 258 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 10 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
The Applicant shall dedicate a 12.5-foot public
utility easement for overhead and/or
underground facilities and appurtenances
adjacent to all public street rights-of-ways.
The Applicant shall dedicate any private drive,
ingress and egress easement, (and 10-feet
adjacent thereto) as a public utility easement
for (overhead and) underground facilities and
appurtenances. All access roads shall meet
minimum SMUD requirements for access
roads.
The Applicant shall dedicate and provide all-
weather vehicular access for service vehicles
that are up to 26,000 pounds. At a minimum:
(a) the drivable surface shall be 20-feet wide;
and (b) all SMUD underground equipment and
appurtenances shall be within 15-feet from the
drivable surface.
The Applicant shall disclose existing or
proposed 69 kV electrical facilities to future
and/or potential owners.
Applicant will include phasing of development
and order of planned construction upon
submitting a new service application to SMUD
for the initial subdivision phase(s) and/or road
improvement backbone project(s).
Development should be phased to start
adjacent to existing electrical infrastructure to
minimize temporary overhead and/or
underground electrical facilities.

Page 259 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 11 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Development phases submitted for new
service should include all lots fronting streets

36. Water supply will be provided by the Sacramento
County Water Agency:
Provide separate public water service to each
parcel. All water lines shall be located within
a public right-of-way or within easements
dedicated to SCWA. Easements shall be
reviewed and approved by Sacramento
County Water Agency prior to Improvement
Plan approval or Final Map approval.
Destroy all abandoned wells on the proposed
project site in accordance with the
requirements of the Sacramento County
Environmental Health Division. Clearly show
all abandoned/destroyed wells on the
improvement plans for the project. Prior to
abandoning any existing agricultural wells,
applicant shall use water from agricultural
wells for grading and construction.
No water supply mains shall be located under
structures such as box culverts and bridges.

If the project will build box culverts and
bridges to the ultimate width, water mains
shall cross above ground attached to the side
of the structure. Structures shall be designed
accordingly. If the ultimate width is not being
built, water mains shall cross underground
routed outside of and around the ultimate
structure footprint. 15-foot wide water main
easements shall be dedicated for the portion
outside of ROW. The crossing shall be be
approved by the Agency Engineer.

Water Prior to Approval of
Improvement Plans or
Final Map Approval.

Sacramento
County Water
Agency

Page 260 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 12 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Underground crossings and attachments to
structures shall be included in the
environmental impact analysis. Additional
environmental permitting and other associated
costs will be at applicant’s expense.

37. The applicant shall comply with the Fire conditions as follows:
a. Show the design for a fire access roadway of
not less than 20-feet of unobstructed width,
13-feet, 6-inches of vertical clearance, and
turning radii of 25 feet inside and 50 feet
outside dimension on the improvement plans.

The access roadway shall extend to within
150 feet of all portions of the exterior walls of
the first story of any proposed building. The
use of turf-block or grass-crete or similar
alternate road surfaces is not approved for
installation in fire apparatus access roadways.
b. Show on the plans how Fire Lanes will be
marked. Fire Lane identification shall be
provided along the required fire access
roadway. Fire Lane identification shall be in
accordance with the Sacramento Metro Fire
Districts Fire Prevention Standard #3 and the
California Vehicle Code.
c. Provide a note on the plan that reads, “Fire
access roadways shall be built to bear a
minimum of 80,000 pounds and meet the
Sacramento County Public Works Standards
for roadways. A report, prepared by a
registered geotechnical engineer, verifying the
Fire Prior to approval of
Improvement Plans
Fire

Page 261 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 13 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
ability of the road to bear the required
minimum weight, shall be submitted with any
plan indicating construction of roadway.

Verification of constructed roadway shall be
provided by a registered geotechnical
engineer prior to final of the project.
d. Show the location of the required fire hydrants
for this project on the improvement plans.

Approved fire hydrants capable of providing
the required fire flow for the protection of any
and all structures shall be located along the
fire apparatus access roadway. The required
fire hydrants shall be installed and operational
prior to any construction, (including
foundations) or on-site storage of combustible
materials. The minimum required fire flow for
the protection of residential developments with
an area per building not exceeding 3,600
square feet is 1,000 gallons per minute (gpm)
at a pressure of 20 pounds per square inch
(psi) for a two-hour duration.

Prior to Issuance of Building Permit

38. The alley and street corner lots shall incorporate the house front door/front elevation facing the street
Corner Lot Architecture Prior to issuance of
building permits
Planning

39. Secure City of Rancho Cordova Public Works
Department approval of final grading plans, as
required by City Ordinance
Grading Plans Prior to issuance of
building permits
Public Works

40. Install [public] improvements per the approved Public Works plans and to the satisfaction of the Public
Works Department.

Infrastructure Prior to issuance of
building permits
Public Works

41. Prior to issuance of the first building permit within the Tentative Map: All streets and improvements shown
on the Tentative Map, all streets necessary for
Infrastructure Prior to issuance of the
first building permit
within a TM phase.

Public Works

Page 262 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 14 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
access to the proposed homes, associated
improvements included in the approved improvement
plans, and other infrastructure as necessary for
adequate public access and use shall be substantially
complete to the satisfaction of the Public Works
Department. Prior to occupancy all streets and
improvements shown on the Tentative Map shall be
fully constructed and completed to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer.

42. Residential fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted for review and approval to the SMFD for all new one-
and two-family dwellings in accordance with
California Residential Code
Fire Sprinkler Plans Prior to issuance of
Building Permits
Fire

43. Residential roof coverings shall consist of materials having a minimum Class C rating
Roof Prior to issuance of
Building Permits
Fire

44. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, the project developer/owner shall pay Zone
40 development fees applicable at the time of building
permit issuance in accordance with Title 4 of the
Sacramento County Water Agency (SCWA) Code
Fees Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento
County Water
Agency

45. The owner must contact Permit Services Unit at
[email protected] or by phone at (916)
876-6100 to determine if sewer impact fees are due.

Fees are to be paid prior to the issuance of building
permit.

Fees Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento Area
Sewer District

46. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, the project shall conform to the specific
provisions of the City of Rancho Cordova
Landscaping Ordinance (Municipal Code Title 23,
Chapter 23.716).

Water Landscaping Prior to Issuance of
Building Permits
Sacramento
County Water
Agency

47. Applicant shall submit improvement plans to the
satisfaction of the Public Works Department.

Infrastructure Prior to issuance of
Building Permits
Public Works

Page 263 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 15 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Improvement plans shall include, but shall not be
limited to, all streets, water, sewer, storm drain,
lighting, signage and striping, and other associated
facilities for all streets and other public areas depicted on the tentative map.

Prior to Final Inspection

48. All roads providing access to the completed homes
shall be fully constructed and accepted by the City
Engineer.

Infrastructure Prior to final inspection Public Works

49. During and upon completion of the installation of the landscaping for the project, the project landscape
architect/designer shall certify that the installed
landscape complies with the approved plans.

Certification shall be accomplished by completion of
site visits at key installation milestones. Key
milestones at a minimum shall include: rough grade,
soil amendment verification, Plant material inspection, irrigation coverage test, underdrain installation (as
applicable) and final installation. Certification shall include signed site observation reports, photographs
and documentation verifying implementation of soil
report recommendations. Failure to submit complete
and accurate documentation to the Planning
Department will delay final approval/occupancy of the
project.

Landscaping Prior to final inspection Public Works

50. Upon completion of the installation of the
landscaping, the designer shall certify that the
landscape complies with all city water conserving
landscape requirements. Certification shall be
accomplished by completion of a certificate of
compliance on a form approved by the director of the
city public works department. Failure to submit a
complete and accurate certificate of compliance will
delay final approval of the project and/or discontinue
Landscaping Water
Conservation
Prior to final inspection Public Works

Page 264 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.3. ATTACHMENT 3
Sunridge Lot J Village 4 DD100 Exhibit B to the Resolution

Page 16 of 16 ends

DD10028 September 6, 2022
Conditions of Approval
Category Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
water service per RCMC 22.180.090. Upon receipt of
the certificate of compliance and site inspection from
City staff, the landscaping performance bond will be
released.

51. Record drawings of grading and improvement plans
(1 full size and 1 half size hard copy), as well as a
compact disc containing said plans in AutoCAD and
pdf format, and a GIS shape file, or equivalent to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer shall be submitted
and approved by the Public Works Department
Drawing Record Prior to final inspection Public Works

52. Approved numbers or addresses shall be placed on
all new or existing buildings in such a position as to
be easily read from the street. Minimum size of the
numbers shall not be less than 6 inches and shall be
mounted immediately adjacent to a light source and
shall also contrast with their background.

Address Prior to Final
Occupancy
Fire
Prior to Acceptance of Improvements

53. Grant the improved landscaped lots within the phase of construction to the City of Rancho Cordova as
shown on the approved tentative map and tentative
map phasing plan and provide a maintenance entity
with an ongoing funding source.

The maintenance entity shall be approved and found
acceptable by City representatives. Annexation to a
current Lighting and Landscape District or a Mello
Roos Community Finance District may be possible
and is the preferred course of action.

Maintenance Prior to Acceptance of
Improvements
Public Works
Advisory
The installation of security gates across a fire apparatus access road shall be authorized by the Chief and meet the requirements of the County Emergency Access Gates and
Barriers Standard. Plans shall be submitted prior to
installation.

Advisory Advisory Fire

Page 265 of 600 ends

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 10.4.

DATE: September 6, 2022

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Elizabeth Sparkman, Community Development Director Dalia Fadl, Principal Engineer

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION DECLARING A PROTEST HEARING AND

AUTHORIZING THE MAILING OF PROPERTY OWNER BALLOT

RELATING TO THE IMPOSITION OF AN ANNUAL STORMWATER

UTILITY FEE FOR A PORTION OF THE RANCH PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution would declare the results of the property owner protest and, if there exists less than a majority protest, authorize the mailing of a ballot to the property owner(s) to approve the levy of the fee to pay for maintenance of storm drainage and flood protection systems for the project. The action also sets 1:30 p.m. on September 8, 2022, in the office of the City Clerk, as the time and date for the ballot tabulation for the matter.

BACKGROUND

The Ranch project has a condition of approval which requires funding for operation and maintenance of the storm drainage system. This condition will be satisfied by the participation in the new Stormwater Utility Fee for storm drainage and flood protection services which is the subject of tonight’s action.

The property owners of a portion of The Ranch project have requested the City annex the project to the City’s Stormwater Utility Fee pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code Section 5471 et seq. to provide the method of financing for storm drainage and flood protection services required to meet the condition.

On November 15, 2021, Council adopted a Resolution which established Procedures for the Conduct of a Protest Hearing and Balloting Relating to a Stormwater Utility Fee (the “Procedures”) and designated December 6, 2021, at 5:30 p.m. as the time and place for hearing protests in connection with the annual Stormwater Utility Fee for a portion of The Ranch project. The protest hearing was conducted and no protests were received, but because of errors with the parcel numbers previously listed in the Annexation Boundary Map, the protest hearing will be conducted again at this City Council meeting and authorizing of the re-mailing of

Page 266 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

new property owner ballots.

DISCUSSION

The property owners have submitted a petition and waiver for the City to institute the proceedings to participate in the Stormwater Utility Fee. This annexation to the Stormwater Utility Fee will include the project generally known as The Ranch project, see Attachment 2.

The maintenance services to be funded include the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual operation, maintenance, and servicing of the storm drain and flood protection systems.

Attachment 1 is the Resolution declaring the results of the property owner protest and authorizing the mailing of the property owner ballot, as required by Article XIII D of the California Constitution (also known as Proposition 218). The Resolution sets forth the tabulation of ballots on September 8, 2022, at 1:30 p.m. in the office of the City Clerk. The results of the mailed ballot election will be presented to City Council at their regularly scheduled meeting on September 19, 2022, and additional actions will be recommended based on the ballot results.

A “Rate Analysis Report” was approved by City Council on September 4, 2014, by Resolution 103-2014 setting Fiscal Year 2014/2015 maximum annual Stormwater Utility Fee amount for each parcel proportionate to the estimated stormwater runoff for each parcel, see Attachment

3. The maximum annual fee will increase each subsequent Fiscal Year by the annual change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), during the preceding year, for All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose areas, published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. A sample of the Stormwater Utility Fees for Fiscal Year 2022-2023 are summarized in Attachment 4.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

There is no impact to the City’s General Fund.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Annexation Boundary Map

3. Stormwater (SWU) Rate and Analysis Report

4. Stormwater Utility Fee- Rate Sheet FY22-23

Page 267 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.4. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE

OF CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE PROPERTY OWNER PROTEST

AND AUTHORIZING THE MAILING OF A PROPERTY OWNER BALLOT RELATING TO THE

IMPOSITION OF AN ANNUAL STORMWATER UTILITY FEE FOR A PORTION OF THE

RANCH PROJECT

WHEREAS, this Council has received petitions and waivers from the owners of not less than 100% of the area of land proposed to be annexed into the Stormwater Utility Fee; and WHEREAS, on November 24, 2021, the City Clerk caused a notice of the time and place of the hearing thereon and on the proposed annexation to the Stormwater Utility Fee to be published and such public hearing was opened on December 6, 2021; and WHEREAS, because of errors with the parcel numbers previously listed in the Annexation Boundary Map, the rescheduled protest hearing will be held at this City Council meeting; and

WHEREAS, the Council adopted Resolution 103-2014 approving a written report entitled, "Rate Analysis Report", dated September 4, 2014 (the "Written Report") prepared by Harris & Associates and filed with the City Clerk containing a description of each parcel of real property within the City to which the Stormwater Utility Fee is applicable (collectively, the "Identified Parcels") and the amount of the Stormwater Utility Fee for each such Identified Parcel for Fiscal Year 2014-15. The Written Report is on file in the office of the City Clerk and is available for public inspection; and
WHEREAS, this Council adopted a Resolution which established Procedures for the Conduct of a Protest Hearing and Balloting Relating to a Stormwater Utility Fee (the “Procedures”) and set the date of public hearing; and
WHEREAS, this Council has conducted the public hearing and all interested persons have been afforded the opportunity to be heard, and the City Council has considered all protests against the annexation to the Stormwater Utility Fee; and WHEREAS, there was no majority protest of the owners of the Identified Parcels subject to the Proposed Stormwater Utility Fee.

NOW, THEREFORE, HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to mail a property owner ballot in accordance with law and the Procedures.

3. The date of the ballot tabulation shall be September 8, 2022 at 1:30 pm.

4. The date of the Council Meeting to report the results of the mailed ballot election shall be September 19, 2022 at 5:30 or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard.

5. The City Council hereby designates Elizabeth Sparkman, Community Development Director, telephone number, (916) 851-8714 to answer inquiries regarding the ballot

Page 268 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.4. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 2 proceedings and procedural or technical matters.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 6th day of September 2022 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Donald Terry, Mayor

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 269 of 600 ends

Legend
Annexation Boundary
Parcel Boundary

RANCHO CORDOVA PKWY

EXEMPT PARK

CHRYSANTHY BLVD

EXEMPT OPEN SPACE

EXEMPT OPEN SPACE
067-2410-001
067-2410-002
067-2420-003
067-2420-002
067-2410-004
067-2410-003
067-2410-008
067-2410-
007
067-2410-005
067-2420-005
067-2420-
006
067-2410-
006
067-2420-004
!

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

STORMWATER UTILITY FEE AREA
ANNEXATION 29
(THE RANCH PROJECT)
(REVISED 8/2/22)
ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 270 of 600 ends

Rate Analysis Report
for the
Stormwater Utility Fee
For the

City of Rancho Cordova
August 7, 2014
ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 271 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report Page 1

Q:\Sacramento\Storm Drain User Fee\Report\rancho cordova drainage fee rpt DRAFT 08.6.14.docx Introduction
The City of Rancho Cordova (City) is detaching from the County of Sacramento fee and is creating their own Stormwater Utility Fee, which is being levied per the California Health and Safety Code Section 5471 et seq.

The purpose of this Rate Analysis Report is to:
 Review the Stormwater Utility Fee and improvements to be funded.  Review the requirements of Article XIIID of the State Constitution (Proposition 218) relating to requirements for apportioning the costs associated with the City’s stormwater runoff system.  Analyze and recommend an appropriate rate structure and provide estimated rates based on cost data information provided by the City.

Proposition 218 Requirements
This fee must comply with the provisions of Article XIIID of the California Constitution (Proposition 218). Section 6 of Proposition 218 has the following requirements for all “new, extended, imposed or increased” fees and charges:
1) “Revenues derived from the fee or charge shall not exceed the funds required to provide the property-related service.”
2) “Revenues derived from the fee or charge shall not be used for any purpose other than that for which the fee or charge was imposed.”
3) “The amount of a fee or charge imposed upon any parcel or person as an incident of property ownership shall not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel.” 4) “No fee or charge may be imposed for a service unless that service is actually used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the property in question. Fees or charges based on potential or future use of service are not permitted. Standby charges, whether characterized as charges or assessments, shall be classified as assessments and shall not be imposed without compliance with [the assessment section of this code].” 5) “No fee or charge may be imposed for general governmental services including, but not limited to, police, fire, ambulance or library services where the service is available to the public at large in substantially the same manner as it is to property owners.” Background Information
In accordance with the Federal Clean Water Act of 1972, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is required to establish regulations setting forth National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit standards. The enactment of 1987 amendments to the Federal Clean Water Act (Act) of 1972 imposes permit requirements for discharge of storm waters. The Act allows the EPA to delegate its NPDES permitting authority to states with an approved environmental regulatory program. The State of California is one of the delegated states.

The responsibility for implementing various NPDES permits in the State of California has been delegated to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). The SWRCB administers NPDES authority through its nine Regional Boards. As an NPDES permittee, the City is required to manage stormwater pollution within its jurisdiction.

ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 272 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report Page 2

Q:\Sacramento\Storm Drain User Fee\Report\rancho cordova drainage fee rpt DRAFT 08.6.14.docx In order to provide for the safety of the residents of the City and protect property in the City from the damage associated with flooding and to meet the requirements of the NPDES permit, it is necessary to design, construct, operate, maintain, improve and replace storm drainage facilities which collect storm and surface water runoff and convey and treat such runoff in a safe manner to an acceptable point of discharge. It is also necessary to inspect, monitor, and take enforcement action related to illegal dumping, and illicit discharges. In order to properly fund such facilities and activities, the City has determined that it is necessary to impose on all developing properties in Rancho Cordova a user charge for storm drainage service.

Based on the 2030 General Plan and current specific plan areas, Rancho Cordova is expected to develop as shown in Table 1 below. The proposed boundary for the stormwater utility is shown in Appendix A.

ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 273 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report Page 3

Q:\Sacramento\Storm Drain User Fee\Report\rancho cordova drainage fee rpt DRAFT 08.6.14.docx Table 1 – Land Use

A more detailed land use table by development area is shown in Appendix D.

This development is expected to require significant stormwater drainage and flood control facilities.

Based on the development area and improvements that were required in four (4) recent developments Land Use/ Zoning Description Total Acre s Total Units
Residential:

LDR SF (2.1-6.0 DU/AC) 2,635 13,156
MD (6.1-12 DU/AC) 322 2,524
MDR MD (6.1-18.0 DU/AC) 1,852 13,231
MD (14.0-29.9 DU/AC) 60 885
HDR HD (18.1-40.0 DU/AC) 192 4,372
HD (30+ DU/AC) 30 825
Residential Total 5,090 34,993
Non-Residential:

VC Village Commercial 202
LTC Local Town Center 134
RTC Regional Town Center 172
BP Business Park 158
MP Industrial Park 283
Education:

HS/MS High School/Middle School 356
MS Middle School 20
ES Elementary School 102
Open Space & Public:

CP Community Park 313
P/QP Public/Quasi Public 37
NP Neighborhood Park 194
SWD Storm Water Detention 186
WP Wetland Preserve 745
DP Drainage Parkway 270
PR Private Recreation 63
OS Open Space 168
OS/P Open Space/Preserve 279
LC Landscape Corridors 123
GB Green Belts 54
ROW Right-of-way 596
BR/WP Reservoir / Wetland Preserve 528
S Sewer Lift Station / Utility Subst a 14
Vacant (unknown dev plan) 595
Total Non-residential 5,590
Total Residential & Non-Res 10,680
ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 274 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report Page 4

Q:\Sacramento\Storm Drain User Fee\Report\rancho cordova drainage fee rpt DRAFT 08.6.14.docx within the County of Sacramento, Table 2 summarizes the improvements that are expected once development is complete.

Table 2 – Expected Improvements

Services Funded
Expenditures from the revenue generated from the Stormwater Utility Fee are intended to comply with the requirements set forth in the NPDES permit. The activities and services funded by this fee include, but are not limited to:

1. Administration and oversight of the requirements set forth in the NPDES permit to City departments, developments, and local agencies.

2. Respond to and investigate incidents of illicit discharges and illegal connections to the storm drain system.

3. Periodically inspect facilities for proper handling of materials, chemicals, pollutants, garbage, waste, and debris and prevent any discharges to the storm drain system.

4. Regularly clean and maintain catch basins, the flowline, and storm drainage facilities.

5. Installation and maintenance of water quality devices required to keep pollutants out of the storm drain system.

6. Discourage illegal dumping or discharge of pollutants into the storm drain system by stenciling all City-owned catch basins with a "No Dumping" message.

7. Augment public education and outreach programs in regards to the proper use and function of the storm drainage system and the receiving waters.

Infrastructure Type
Inlets 6,400 LF
Manholes 4,460 LF
66" Pipe 3,950 LF
60" Pipe 10,280 LF
54" Pipe 11,140 LF
48" Pipe 10,210 LF
42" Pipe 28,620 LF
36" Pipe 42,420 LF
30" Pipe 51,050 LF
27" Pipe 540 LF
24" Pipe 91,960 LF
21" Pipe 2,230 LF
18" Pipe 100,300 LF
15" Pipe 101,300 LF
12" Pipe 529,890 0
10" Pipe 4,170 0
Creeks and Channels 80 AC
Basins 320 AC
Quantit
y
ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 275 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report Page 5

Q:\Sacramento\Storm Drain User Fee\Report\rancho cordova drainage fee rpt DRAFT 08.6.14.docx

8. Develop programs to promote, publicize, and facilitate public reporting of illicit discharges to the storm drain system.

9. Encourage the proper disposal of household hazardous waste (HHW) to prevent the improper disposal to the storm drain system or to the sewer system.

10. Discourage the improper disposal of litter, garden clippings, leaves, and pet waste into the street or the storm drain system.

11. Capital replacement of storm drainage and flood control improvements at the end of the expected useful life for such improvements.

Rate Structure Analysis
Section 6.b of Article XIIID of the State Constitution (Proposition 218) states that:
“The amount of a fee or charge imposed upon any parcel or person as an incident of property ownership shall not exceed the proportional cost of the service attributable to the parcel.” and
“No fee or charge may be imposed for a service unless that service is actually used by, or immediately available to, the owner of the property in question.” By definition, all properties that shed stormwater into the City’s stormwater drainage system use, or are served by, the City’s stormwater drainage system. The amount of use attributed to each parcel is measurable by the amount of storm runoff contributed by the property, which is directly proportional to the amount of impervious area on a parcel (such as buildings and concrete). The more impervious area on a property, the more storm runoff the property generates, the more demand placed on the storm drain system.

The amount each parcel uses the stormwater drainage system is computed by the following formula:
(Parcel Area) x (Impervious Percentage) = Drainage Units The typical percent impervious (% Impervious) for land uses in the City, have been applied for the purposes of estimating the runoff generated by each property. These are shown in Appendix B.

The more Drainage Units a parcel has, the more storm run-off it generates, and the more it uses and impacts the stormwater drainage system.

It is standard practice to relate other land uses to a developed single family residential (SFR) parcel, instead of working exclusively with drainage units. The median size of a SFR parcel will be approximately 0.16 acre. Therefore, it makes sense to relate all parcels to this median residential property. The runoff from a 0.16-acre SFR parcel is set equal to one Drainage Measurement Unit (DMU) and this base DMU is calculated as follows:
(0.16 acres of area) x 50% = 0.0800 Impervious Area = 1 DMU

ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 276 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report Page 6

Q:\Sacramento\Storm Drain User Fee\Report\rancho cordova drainage fee rpt DRAFT 08.6.14.docx Single Family Residential Parcels
As a SFR property increases in size over the median parcel size, the typical percentage of impervious area decreases, as shown in Appendix B. Conversely, as a SFR parcel decreases in size below the median parcel size, the typical percentage of impervious area increases, and such increase is typically proportional to the decrease in size. Therefore, SFR properties are separated into five (5) groups.

The median parcel area for each group was used and their DMUs are calculated as follows:

SFR Category DMU/ Formula
SFR1 – SFR parcels 0.16 acres or less 1.00 DMU
SFR2 – SFR parcels 0.17 - 0.25 acres 1.10 DMUs
SFR3 – SFR parcels 0.26 – 0.33 acres 1.175 DMUs
SFR4 – SFR parcels 0.34 – 0.50 acres 1.25 DMUs
SFR5 – SFR parcels greater than 0.50 acres 1.25 + [(acres – 0.50) x 5%] = DMUs

0.0800
Multi-Family Residential Parcels
Multi-Family Residential (MFR) units (including condominiums) are split into categories by the density, or number of dwelling units per acre (DU/Ac) as follows:

MFR Category Density % Impervious
MFR1 - High Density Greater than 18 DU/Ac 75%
MFR 2 - Med Density 10 – 18 DU/Ac 70%
Acreage x %Impervious = DMUs

0.0800
Condominium unit parcel areas are calculated by dividing the total area of the condominium complex (which includes the common area) by the number of condominium units, and the total imperviousness of the entire complex is attributed to each individual condo parcel in the complex. (This divides the runoff of the entire complex to each of the individual units.) Because these condominium common areas are taken into consideration in this manner, they are exempt from the charge.

Non- Residential Parcels
All non-residential parcel DMUs will be based on the impervious area (runoff coefficient) table shown in Exhibit B, using the following formula:

Acreage x %Impervious = DMUs

0.0800
All parcels draining into Rancho Cordova Stormwater Utility Fee-maintained drainage infrastructure are proposed to be charged the same user fee rate per DMU for stormwater runoff treatment. The Rancho Cordova Stormwater Utility Fee is proposed in perpetuity.

For the purposes of this report, City-maintained drainage infrastructure includes streets, pipes, inlets, outlets, and natural drainage courses. Parcels related to these types of property uses are exempt from the runoff charge, as they are part of the infrastructure being funded. Also exempt from the runoff charge is Caltrans right-of-way, because Caltrans handles its own runoff under a separate NPDES permit.

ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 277 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report Page 7

Q:\Sacramento\Storm Drain User Fee\Report\rancho cordova drainage fee rpt DRAFT 08.6.14.docx Drainage units may be adjusted based on appeal from the property owner. See the Appeals Process below.

Table 3, below, provides a preliminary summary of DMUs for the various land uses in Rancho Cordova.

Table 3 – Drainage Measurement Unit Summary Table

Landuse Description
Number of
Units
Total A rea
(acres)
Impervious
Ar e a
(acres) DMUs
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SFR1) 15,107 2,028 15,107.00 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SFR2) 13,790 2,776 15,169.00 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SFR3) 14 4 16.45
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SFR4) -
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SFR5) -
MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (MFR1) 6,082 282 2,639.06
COMMERCIAL 666 499 6,240.00
INDUSTRIAL 283 226 2,830.00
SCHOOLS 478 239 2,985.00
PRIVATE RECREATION 63 16 195.31
PARKS/GREENBELTS 561 140 1,752.47
PUBLIC 51 15 190.13
TOTAL 34,993 7,190 47,124
ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 278 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report Page 8

Q:\Sacramento\Storm Drain User Fee\Report\rancho cordova drainage fee rpt DRAFT 08.6.14.docx Cost Estimate
Table 4 below shows the estimated costs to maintain infrastructure in the developing areas. Unit costs for maintenance were derived using budget information provided by the County, since the County currently maintains the storm drainage system. The budget information is shown in Appendix C.

Table 4 – Estimated Costs

Fee Calculations
The estimated annual costs for the proposed storm drain improvements are $5,401,709 as shown in Table 4 above. Dividing that by the total number of proposed DMU’s in Rancho Cordova (47,124), the maximum estimated annual Stormwater Utility Fee rate is $114.63 per DMU.

This would be the proposed maximum fee rate for fiscal year 2014-15. The maximum rate will be increased each subsequent Fiscal Year by the annual change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI), during the preceding year, for All Urban Consumers, for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose areas, published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics (or a reasonably equivalent index should the stated index be discontinued, as determined by the Director of Public Works).

Estimated Quantity Unit Cost ($/unit) Total Cost/Year
Maintenance Costs:

Trunk Lines (larger than 24") - TV Lines 158210 LF 7.50$ 25 years 47,463.00$ Drainage Lines 10"-24" Cleaning 829850 LF 3.00$ 10 years 248,955.00$ Drainage Lines 10"-24" TV 829850 LF 7.50$ 25 years 248,955.00$ Creek and Channel Maintenance and Repair 65070 LF 0.75$ 1 year 49,009.83$ Pipe Repairs 998920 LF 0.45$ 1 year 451,380.43$ Creeks and Channels Mowing 80 AC $6,825 1 year 546,000.00$ Creeks and Channels Herbicides 80 AC $680 1 year 54,400.00$ HydroMod Basin Maintenance 320 AC $4,830 1 year 1,545,600.00$ Basin De-silt 320 AC $1,000 25 years 12,800.00$
Basins Herbicides 320 AC $761 1 year 243,360.00$
Replacement Costs:

Inlets 6400 EA $2,000 75 years $170,667
Manholes 4460 EA $3,500 75 years $208,133
66" Pipe 3950 LF $550 100 years $21,725
60" Pipe 10280 LF $475 100 years $48,830
54" Pipe 11140 LF $400 100 years $44,560
48" Pipe 10210 LF $325 100 years $33,183
42" Pipe 28620 LF $275 100 years $78,705
36" Pipe 42420 LF $225 100 years $95,445
30" Pipe 51050 LF $175 100 years $89,338
27" Pipe 540 LF $150 100 years $810
24" Pipe 91960 LF $125 100 years $114,950
21" Pipe 2230 LF $115 100 years $2,565
18" Pipe 100300 LF $105 100 years $105,315
15" Pipe 101300 LF $95 100 years $96,235
12" Pipe 529890 LF $85 100 years $450,407
10" Pipe 4170 LF $75 100 years $3,128
Total: $5,011,917
Annual Fee Administration: $45,000
Operating (Cash Flow) Reserve (10% of Maintenance Costs): $344,792 Estimated Total: $5,401,709
Frequency
ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 279 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report Page 9

Q:\Sacramento\Storm Drain User Fee\Report\rancho cordova drainage fee rpt DRAFT 08.6.14.docx The actual rate to be levied each year will be as approved by the City at a public hearing, after they consider an Annual Fee Report outlining the estimated annual costs of the program for the ensuing fiscal year.

Table 5 provides sample fee calculations for various land uses and parcel sizes.

Table 5 – Sample Calculations

The Preliminary Charge Roll, which is a listing of each parcel to be charged a fee and its proposed maximum fee for FY 2014-15, is on file in the office of the City Clerk.

Appeals Process
If a property owner disagrees with the calculation of his or her fee, based on the parcel area and estimated impervious percentage assigned to the property, then the property owner may appeal the calculation as follows:

1. Property owner must provide written documentation explaining the reason why the charge should be changed. This documentation must include:
a. The name, phone number, mailing address, and email address, if available, of the property owner.
b. The Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) of the property in question.

2. If additional documentation is required or insufficient documentation was submitted, a representative of the Department of Public Works (Staff) will notify the property owner in writing.

3. Once Staff has determined that sufficient documentation has been submitted, Staff will perform the initial review. Staff will notify the property owner in writing within four (4) weeks from the time sufficient documentation was submitted as to whether or not the fee amount will be changed.
a. If the determination is to change the fee amount, then the new fee amount will be documented within the City’s fee database.

Land Use Description
Total A rea
(acres)
Impervious
Are a
(acres) DMUs Sample Fee
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SFR1) 0.16 1.000 114.63$ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SFR2) 0.22 1.100 126.09$ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SFR3) 0.30 1.175 134.69$ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SFR4) 0.40 1.250 143.28$ SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (SFR5) 1.00 1.563 179.10$ MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (MFR1) 5.00 3.75 46.875 5,373.12$ COMMERCIAL1

1.00 0.75 9.375 1,074.62$ INDUSTRIAL 1.00 0.80 10.000 1,146.27$ SCHOOLS 5.00 2.50 31.250 3,582.08$ PRIVATE RECREATION 1.00 0.25 3.125 358.21$ PARKS/GREENBELTS 2.00 0.20 2.500 286.57$ PUBLIC 2.00 0.60 7.500 859.70$ 1 Average of Downtown and Neighborhood Commercial as shown in Appendix B ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 280 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report Page 10

Q:\Sacramento\Storm Drain User Fee\Report\rancho cordova drainage fee rpt DRAFT 08.6.14.docx b. If the determination is that the fee should not be changed, the property owner can appeal Staff’s decision to the Director of Public Works. The appeal must be made in writing and returned no later than four (4) weeks from the date of mailing of Staff’s initial review decision. The Director of Public Works will notify the property owner in writing within four (4) weeks from the date of receipt of the appeal as to whether or not the fee amount will be changed.

If the owner of any parcel shall have reason to feel that the computation of the DMU for his/her parcel is not correct, that person may file an appeal with the Director of Public Works in the manner prescribed by the Director of Public Works. The Director of Public Works will consider all data provided by the appellant and shall render a decision in writing.

The decision of the Director of Public Works will be final with respect to City action on the appeal.

Appeals will be accepted annually up until June 30 for inclusion on the following fiscal year’s property tax roll submittal. However, if an appeal is granted by Staff or the Director of Public Works that does not permit inclusion for the following fiscal year’s property tax roll submittal, a reimbursement will be provided to the property owner by the City.

Respectfully submitted:

Harris & Associates

Dennis A. Anderson
Senior Project Manager

ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 281 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report APPENDIX A

APPENDIX A

ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 282 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report APPENDIX B

APPENDIX B

Runoff Coefficient

Land Use Impervious
Single Family Residential less than 0.166 acres 50%
Single Family Residential 0.166 acres to 0.250 acres 40% Single Family Residential 0.251 acres to 0.330 acres 30% Single Family Residential 0.331 acres to 0.500 acres 25% Single Family Residential Over 0.500 acres (excluding the first 0.500 acres) 5% High-Density Residential (including Apartments and Mobile Home Parks) 75% Condominiums 70%
Commercial Downtown Areas1 80%
Commercial Neighborhood Areas 70%
Industrial 80%
Schools 50%
Parks 25%
Greenbelts 10%
Footnotes:
1 City of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code Chapter 15.

Sources:

1. Yolo County City/County Drainage Manual, February 2010.

2. Stormwater Quality Design Manual for the Sacramento and South Placer Regions, May 2007.

ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 283 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report Appendix C

Appendix C

Cost Information

ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 284 of 600 ends

County of Sacramento/City of Rancho Cordova
Current Storm Drain Maintenance Costs
Repair Type
Actual Expenditures for FY
11/12
FY 13/14
Budget
County North OCUO Drain Line Upgrade or Repair 630,912.90 $ 630,912.90 $ OFFO Fence Repair 19,343.41 $ 19,343.41 $ OHKO Inlet Outfall Repair 455,724.02 $ 455,724.02 $ OMSO Erosion Control 26,189.60 $ 26,189.60 $ OY8O Manhole Repair 63,362.44 $ 63,362.44 $ RAMP ADA Compliant Ramp - $ - $ Overhead 36.39% 435,026.56 $ 435,026.56 $ 1,630,558.93$ 1,630,558.93 $
County South OCUO Drain Line Upgrade or Repair 105,317.24 $ 105,317.24 $ OFFO Fence Repair 35,802.01 $ 35,802.01 $ OHKO Inlet Outfall Repair 214,660.90 $ 214,660.90 $ OMSO Erosion Control - $ - $ OY8O Manhole Repair 8,585.40 $ 8,585.40 $ RAMP ADA Compliant Ramp - $ - $ Overhead 23.51% 85,667.45 $ 85,667.45 $ 450,033.00$ 450,033.00$
Rancho Cordova OCUO Drain Line Upgrade or Repair 222,809.74$ 229,850.53$ OFFO Fence Repair 26,326.14$ 27,158.05$ OHKO Inlet Outfall Repair 224,877.26$ 231,983.38$ OMSO Erosion Control -$ -$ OY8O Manhole Repair 4,498.84$ 4,641.00$ RAMP ADA Compliant Ramp -$ -$ Overhead 23.51% 112,504.88$ 116,060.03$ 591,016.86$ 609,692.99$
Total LF of Pipes
County 7,865,755 7,865,755
Rancho Cordova 1,349,271 1,349,271 Cost/LF of pipe for Repairs
County 0.26$ 0.26$
Rancho 0.44$ 0.45$
* Costs were increased for 12/13 based on comparing actual expenditures in 11/12 with actual expenditures in 12/13.

Pipe Repair Costs
Total Budget=
Total Budget=
Total Budget=
Budget Classification
8/6/2014
ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 285 of 600 ends

County of Sacramento/City of Rancho Cordova
Current Storm Drain Maintenance Costs
Repair Type
Actual
Expenditures FY
11/12
FY 13/14
Budget
County OCCO Inspect Channels 149,684.06 $ 149,684.06 $ ODSO Clean, Inspect trach Racks and Box Culverts 203,337.83 $ 203,337.83 $ OF8O Sandbag Distribution 5,184.60 $ 5,184.60 $ OFCO Drainage Response 82,451.66 $ 82,451.66 $ OFDO Concrete Channel Cleaning Bobcat 552,150.54 $ 552,150.54 $ OHWO Vegetation Removal County Forces
OJZO Clean and Inspect Outfall Structures 191,840.84 $ 191,840.84 $ OLCO Access Road Maintenance - $ - $ OLDO Mowing
OMPO Expose Pipe End Mechanically 2,720.90 $ 2,720.90 $ OMRO Channel Cleaning Mechanical 49,087.50 $ 49,087.50 $ OORC Rodent Control 32,695.06 $ 32,695.06 $
OTVD Tree Removal 79,463.44 $ 79,463.44 $
OVDO Dry Spoil Dumping 8,137.34 $ 8,137.34 $ OWCO Weed Control Chemical
Overhead 36.39% 493,691.29 $ 493,691.29 $
1,850,445$ 1,850,445 $
County OCCO Inspect Channels 1,797.15$ 1,797.15$ ODSO Clean, Inspect trach Racks and Box Culverts -$ -$ OF8O Sandbag Distribution 2,464.80$ 2,464.80$ OFCO Drainage Response 1,293.11$ 1,293.11$
OFDO Concrete Channel Cleaning Bobcat 144,294.58$ 144,294.58$ OHWO Vegetation Removal County Forces
OJZO Clean and Inspect Outfall Structures -$ -$ OLCO Access Road Maintenance 57,345.54$ 57,345.54$ OLDO Mowing
OMPO Expose Pipe End Mechanically -$ -$ OMRO Channel Cleaning Mechanical 32,935.75$ 32,935.75$ OORC Rodent Control -$ -$
OTVD Tree Removal 214,736.46$ 214,736.46$
OVDO Dry Spoil Dumping -$ -$
Creek and Channel Cleaning
Total Budget=
Budget Classification
8/6/2014
ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 286 of 600 ends

Repair Type
Actual
Expenditures FY
11/12
FY 13/14
BudgetBudget Classification
OWCO Weed Control Chemical
Overhead 23.51% 106,945.71 $ 106,945.71 $
561,813$ 561,813 $
Rancho Cordova OCCO Inspect Channels -$ -$ ODSO Clean, Inspect trach Racks and Box Culverts 413.30$ 413.30$ OF8O Sandbag Distribution -$ -$
OFCO Drainage Response -$ -$
OFDO Concrete Channel Cleaning Bobcat 65,905.39$ 65,905.39$ OHWO Vegetation Removal County Forces
OJZO Clean and Inspect Outfall Structures -$ -$ OLCO Access Road Maintenance -$ -$ OLDO Mowing
OMPO Expose Pipe End Mechanically -$ -$ OMRO Channel Cleaning Mechanical -$ -$ OORC Rodent Control -$ -$
OTVD Tree Removal -$ -$
OVDO Dry Spoil Dumping -$ -$
OWCO Weed Control Chemical
Overhead 23.51% 15,592.45$ 15,592.45$
81,911$ 81,911$
Total LF of Channels
Rancho Cordova (unlined) 74,628 74,628 Rancho Cordova (lined) 37,562 37,562
Total Rancho Cordova 112,189 112,189
County (unlined) 1,677,768 1,677,768
County (lined) 216,153 216,153
Total County 1,893,920 1,893,920
Cost/LF of Channel for Cleaning:

County 1.27$ 1.27$
Rancho 0.73$ 0.75$
* Costs were increased for 12/13 based on comparing actual expenditures in 11/12 with actual expenditures in 12/13.

Total Budget=
Total Budget=
8/6/2014
ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 287 of 600 ends

County of Sacramento/City of Rancho Cordova
Current Storm Drain Maintenance Costs
Activity Size/Location Cost/LF Frequency Notes
Pipes/Channels
Hydro Cleaning 6"-24" 3.00$ 10 years
TV Lines all 7.50$ 25 years
Rancho 0.75$ each year Within SWU Budget
Sac County 1.27$
Pump Mainteance Covered within budget
Per County Staff Assume no pumps
in new areas.

Repairs 2 crews year round SWU funds support this
Hydromod Basin cost/ac
Maintenance 4,830.00$ annul see detailed estimate
Herbicides 325.00$ 2 x's/year
Additional costs
Pesticide Control Advisor 20,000.00$ annually
Engineering admin support with regulatory agencies 10% of maint costs/year Supervisors and managers 5% of maint costs/year
Creek and Channel Cleaning
8/6/2014
ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 288 of 600 ends

Basin Maintenance Costs Cost per Acre
Trash Clean‐up and Disposal (4 x's/year) 1,200$
Mowing (2 x's/year) 200$
Inspection 4 x's/year 1,600$
Erosion Repair 800$
Vegetation and Landscape Maintenance 800$
Sub‐total 4,600$
Over‐head Mark‐up (5%) 230$
Total Cost 4,830$
Hydromod Basin Maintenance
Inspection Includes: Examine gates, fences and access ramp for damage and overgrown vegetation, check basin slopes for erosion, excess vegetation, debris and animal burros, check flow line for excess vegetation and sediment, check for eriosion at water line, large/floating debris, and excess vegetation. Check for debris, creacks and instructure, and erosion at inlets and outlets. Also check access control racks for debris and to snrue they are locked and secured. Check riprap at inlet weir
ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 289 of 600 ends

City of Rancho Cordova August 7, 2014
Stormwater Utility Fee
Rate Analysis Report Appendix D

Appendix D

Detailed Land Use Data

ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 290 of 600 ends

Storm Drain User Fee
City of Rancho Cordova
December 20, 2013 AC, Landuse & units derived from GIS/Aerials North Douglas II Heritage Falls Anatolia IV
Land Use/ Zoning Description AC Units AC Units AC Units AC Units AC Units AC 2012 Units
2012 AC Units AC 2013
Units
2012 AC 2013 Units 2012 Est.

Units
2013 AC Units AC Units AC Units AC Units GIS AC GIS Units GIS AC GIS Units Total Acres Total Units Residential:

LDR SF (2.1-6.0 DU/AC) 35.3 176 144.8 698 3.7 14 44.7 276 71.4 388 1,518.5 7,593 179.4 899 142.3 694 35.8 179 347.2 1,580 17.70 153.00 72.20 303.00 21.60 203.00 2,635 13,156 MD (6.1-12 DU/AC) 321.5 2,524 322 2,524
MDR MD (6.1-18.0 DU/AC) 83.8 556 290.0 2,334
a 94.2 528 28.2 287 42.8 227 54.4 402 256.0 2,048 43.7 286 c 105.4 685 17.5 192 146.8 1,389 92.10 525.00 450.8 2,831 146.4 941 1,852 13,231 MD (14.0-29.9 DU/AC) 60.4 885 60 885
HDR HD (18.1-40.0 DU/AC) 98.0 1,960 44.2 980 12.2 378 * 30.4 922 6.80 132.00 192 4,372 HD (30+ DU/AC) 29.5 825 * These may be Attached 30 825
Residential Total 119.1 732 524.7 4,742 94.2 528 31.9 301 87.5 503 125.8 790 1,872.5 11,601 588.8 4,689 259.9 1,757 53.3 371 524.4 3,891 17.7 153 171 960 22 203 450.8 2,831 146.4 941 5,090 34,993 Non-Residential:

VC Village Commercial 16.9 19.5 16.6 20.0 22.0 13.5 93.3 202 LTC Local Town Center 30.4 20.0 83.5 134
RTC Regional Town Center 0.9 113.0 58.4 172
BP Business Park 6.6 65.0 86.0 158
MP Industrial Park 283.0 283
Education:

HS/MS High School/Middle School 72.6 78.0 110.9 b 94.0 b 356 MS Middle School 20.0 20
ES Elementary School 21.2 10.6 54.0 5.50 10.8 102
Open Space & Public:

CP Community Park 11.4 60.7 7.8 107.0 44.9 29.3 52.3 313 P/QP Public/Quasi Public 2.0 3.2 7.5 12.3 10.6 1.1 37
NP Neighborhood Park 3.1 3.8 8.2 5.2 3.4 20.8 67.5 17.0 8.6 6.4 0.71 17.20 3.70 21.2 7.0 194 SWD Storm Water Detention 4.0 15.0 9.6 39.0 53.5 24.3 4.00 17.40 9.5 9.6 186 WP Wetland Preserve 55.8 43.8 81.0 54.5 510.0 745
DP Drainage Parkway 138.0 5.0 104.6 15.30 7.2 270
PR Private Recreation 54.0 4.20 4.3 63
OS Open Space 144.5 22.0 0.60 0.80 168
OS/P Open Space/Preserve 12.0 45.6 174.0 47.7 279
LC Landscape Corridors 1.1 2.8 82.0 19.2 2.70 1.30 13.4 0.7 123 GB Green Belts 2.6 51.0 54
ROW Right-of-way 9.5 104.3 8.5 5.3 22.4 192.0 82.6 20.5 14.5 127.1 6.90 2.20 596 BR/WP Reservoir / Wetland Preserve 302.8 205.1 19.80 528 S Sewer Lift Station / Utility Substation 1.0 6.6 6.4 14 Vacant (unknown dev plan) 567.4 27.3 595
Total Non-residential 91.5 826.1 11.0 79.6 123.1 127.1 1,956.0 676.5 270.2 20.9 613.1 25.1 0.0 70.0 0.0 7.2 0.0 634.3 58.2 5,590 Total Residential & Non-Res 210.6 732.0 1,350.8 4,742.0 105.2 528.0 111.5 301.0 210.6 503.0 252.9 790.0 3,828.5 11,601.0 1,265.3 4,689.0 530.1 1,757.0 74.1 371.0 1,137.5 3,891.0 42.8 153.0 241.1 960.0 28.8 203.0 1,085.1 2,831.0 204.6 941.0 10,680 Notes: All data is from recent plans received in Nov 2013 unless specified otherwise. AC estimated a Arboretum has 2 MD residential classifications. The first line is for 6.1-13.9 DU/AC (instead of 6.1-18) Includes April 2012 b Acreage for all schools Amendment
c Suncreek has 2 MD residential classifications. The second line is for 12.1-18 DU/AC (instead of 6.1-18) Anatolia SunridgeMontelena Rio Del Oro Suncreek The Ranch (Sunridge) Sunridge Lot J WestboroughArista Del Sol Arboretum Douglas 98 Douglas 103 Grantline 208 Q:\Sacramento\Storm Drain User Fee\Land Use Summary and fee calculation 04.15.14.xlsx ITEM 10.4.

ATTACHMENT 3

Page 291 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.4. ATTACHMENT 4 Stormwater Utility Fee
Sample of the Stormwater Utility Fees for Fiscal Year 2022-2023:

Table 1
Land Use Description
Total Area
(acres) Sample Fee
Single Family Residential (SFR1) 0.16 $143.40
Single Family Residential (SFR2) 0.22 $157.73
Single Family Residential (SFR3) 0.30 $168.51
Single Family Residential (SFR4) 0.40 $179.24
Single Family Residential (SFR5) 1.00 $179.24
Multi-Family Residential (MFR1) 5.00 $1,254.93
Commercial 1.00 $1,344.58
Industrial 1.00 $1,434.24
Schools 5.00 $896.39
Private Recreation 1.00 $448.17
Parks/Greenbelts 2.00 $179.24
Public Property (with structures) 2.00 $537.81

Page 292 of 600 ends

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 10.5.

DATE: September 6, 2022

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Elizabeth Sparkman, Community Development Director Dalia Fadl, Principal Engineer

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION CREATING SPECIAL TAX AREA ZONE 31 AND AN

ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL TAX FOR TRANSIT-

RELATED SERVICES A PORTION OF THE RANCH PROJECT

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution creating Special Tax Area Zone 31; waive first reading and introduce the Ordinance establishing a special tax for transit-related services for a portion of The Ranch project.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution and the Ordinance will assist the City in meeting the costs of providing transit-related services by creating a Special Tax Area Zone 31 and establishing a special tax for transit-related services for a portion of The Ranch project.

BACKGROUND

The City Council adopted Resolution No. 141-2005 on November 7, 2005, providing for a special tax for transit-related services to be imposed upon new development within the City.

Pursuant to that Resolution, a property owner approves a special tax on the parcels within a subdivision or project. The City Council then adopts a resolution creating a zone that encompasses the subdivision or project and an ordinance establishing the special tax.

The City Council, on January 6, 2020, adopted a Resolution approving The Ranch Special Planning Area, a 530 acre mixed-use community east of Rancho Cordova Parkway between Douglas Road and Kiefer Boulevard. This annexation consists of the non-age restricted portion on the western half of the project, currently owned by K. Hovnanian at Jeager Ranch, LLC and AG EHC II (HOV) CA 1, L.P. The provision of funding to provide transit-related services by approving a special tax was made a condition of approval for the project.

This item will establish tax area Zone 31, the boundaries of which will be contiguous to the boundaries of the western portion of The Ranch project. In addition to creating the special tax, the Ordinance will also set the date for the transit-related services tax election, which will be held on October 11, 2022, at which time the ballot(s) will be tabulated by the City Clerk, and the results be declared at the City Council meeting on November 7, 2022. These actions were

Page 293 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

previously approved by City Council but because of errors in the parcel numbers in the previously approved Annexation Boundary Map, the annexation process is being redone.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A to the Resolution

3. Ordinance

4. Exhibit A to the Ordinance

5. Exhibit B to the Ordinance- Property Land Use Category

Page 294 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.5. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CREATING SPECIAL TAX AREA ZONE 31 FOR A PORTION OF

THE RANCH PROJECT

WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to create Zone 31 within the City of Rancho Cordova Transit-Related Services Special Tax Area and authorize an election; and

WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to adopt an ordinance establishing a special tax for transit-related services within Zone 31; and

WHEREAS, the City recognizes the need for increased transit-related services in Zone 31 and the difficulty of funding the current or increased level of services with revenues now available; and

WHEREAS, it is the intention of the City Council to direct the City Clerk to conduct an election by mail ballot pursuant to Elections Code Section 4000 and to be held on the earliest date permitted by law; and

WHEREAS, the City Council, on January 6, 2020, adopted a Resolution approving The Ranch Special Planning Area, a 530-acre mixed-use community east of Rancho Cordova Parkway between Douglas Road and Kiefer Boulevard. This annexation consists of the non-age restricted portion on the western half of the project, currently owned by K. Hovnanian at Jeager Ranch, LLC and AG EHC II (HOV) CA 1, L.P. The provision of funding to provide transit-related services by approving a special tax was made a condition of approval for the project. This will be accomplished by the property owner(s) participation in the transit-related services special tax area.

WHEREAS, the transit-related services tax as inflated to Fiscal Year 2022-2023 is $126.16 per low density residential dwelling unit or low density residential dwelling unit equivalent, $100.93 per medium density residential dwelling unit or medium density residential dwelling unit equivalent, $75.70 per high density residential dwelling unit or high density residential dwelling unit equivalent, $3,234.74 per retail and service commercial acre, $2,780.57 per commercial mixed use or office acre, and $1,142.75 per light industrial acre, subject to an annual inflator formula based on the Consumer Price Index for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Area, or six percent, whichever is less. Multi-family residential units on a single parcel shall be assessed on a proportionately equivalent basis (e.g., a two-unit attached housing structure, such as a duplex, would be deemed to consist of two residential parcels for purposes of the transportation tax); and
WHEREAS, for the purposes of this Resolution, a “voter” entitled to vote on the creation of Zone 31 is a person who owns real property within Zone 31, as shown on the last equalized assessment role prepared by the Sacramento County Assessor’s Office, at the time that the City Council submits an ordinance authorizing the imposition of a transit-related services tax to the voters of Zone 31. At the time that the Council adopted this Resolution, there were zero (0) registered voters residing within Zone 31 and two property owners. Because the Transit- Related Services Special Tax will be imposed on property in Zone 31 and paid by the owners of

Page 295 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.5. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 2 the property, the Council finds that restricting the vote on the Transit-Related Services Special Tax to property owners in Zone 31 is appropriate and consistent with the principles and requirements of California Constitution article XIIIC (Proposition 218).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA as follows:

1. That portion of the City of Rancho Cordova shown on the Map, Exhibit A hereto is established as Zone 31 of the Rancho Cordova Transit-Related Services Special Tax Area.

2. That Ordinance, reviewed and approved by the City Council on the same date as the resolution, is to be presented for approval of the voters of Zone 31 by a mail ballot election, to be held on October 11, 2022. The ballot proposition shall read as follows:

“Shall Ordinance No. XX-2022 of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova be approved so as to authorize a special tax on property located in Zone 31 of the Rancho Cordova Transit-Related Services Special Tax Area to maintain the present level of transit-related services and provide additional funding for increased transit-related services?”

3.The City Clerk is directed to take all steps necessary to conduct the election required by this order. Said election shall be conducted by mailed ballot pursuant to Elections Code Section 4000 and shall be held October 11, 2022.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 6th day of September 2022 by following vote:

ATTEST:

Donald Terry, Mayor

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 296 of 600 ends

Legend
Annexation Boundary
Parcel Boundary
067-2410-001

RANCHO CORDOVA PKWY
067-2410-002
067-2420-003
067-2420-002
067-2410-004
067-2410-003

EXEMPT PARK
067-2410-008
067-2410-
007
067-2410-005
067-2420-005
067-2420-
006
067-2410-
006
067-2420-004

CHRYSANTHY BLVD

EXEMPT OPEN SPACE

EXEMPT OPEN SPACE
!

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

TRANSIT RELATED SERVICES SPECIAL TAX AREA
ANNEXATION 31
(THE RANCH PROJECT)
ITEM 10.5.

ATTACHMENT 2
Exhibit A to the Resolution

Page 297 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.5. ATTACHMENT 3 Ordinance No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 5

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
ORDINANCE NO. XX-2022

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,

ESTABLISHING A SPECIAL TAX FOR TRANSIT-RELATED SERVICES FOR A PORTION

OF THE RANCH PROJECT SUBJECT TO VOTER APPROVAL

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF THE RANCHO CORDOVA DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Purpose, Intent and Authority.

It is of critical importance to the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova that residents of and employees working in the City receive high quality transit-related services.

In carefully reviewing the City’s budget and revenue projections, it is clear to City staff that the City budget does not contain adequate funding to ensure the continued delivery of adequate high-quality transit-related services unless additional revenues are obtained.

It is the purpose and intent of this non-codified Ordinance to generate additional funds to pay for transit-related services by authorizing the levy of a tax on improved parcels of real property on the secured property tax roll of Sacramento County that are within Zone 31 of the Rancho Cordova Transit-Related Services Special Tax Area (the “Zone”).

This tax is a special tax within the meaning of Section 4 of the Article XIIIA of the California Constitution. Because the burden of this tax falls upon property, this tax also is a property tax, but this tax is not determined according to nor in any manner based upon the value of property; this tax is levied on a parcel and use of property basis. Insofar as not inconsistent with this Ordinance or with legislation authorizing special taxes and insofar as applicable to a property tax that is not based on value, such provisions of the California Revenue and Taxation Code and of Article XIII of the California Constitution as relate to ad valorem property taxes are intended to apply to the collection and administration of this tax (Section 4 of this Ordinance), as authorized by law. This tax is not an ad valorem property tax; it is an excise tax on the use of property. Because the revenue from the tax may be used only to fund transit-related services, it is also a special tax.

The revenues raised by this tax are to be used solely for the purpose of providing transit-related services as are deemed necessary by the City Council for the benefit of the residents and/or employees of Zone 31.

At the time that the Council adopted this non- codified Ordinance, there were zero (0) registered voters residing in Zone 31 and two (2) property owners. Because the Transit- Related Services Special Tax will be imposed on property in Zone 31 and paid by the owners of the property, the Council finds that restricting the vote on the Transit-Related Services Special Tax to property owners in Zone 31 is appropriate and consistent with the principles and requirements of California Constitution article XIIIC (Proposition 218).

Page 298 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.5. ATTACHMENT 3 Ordinance No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 5 Section 2. Definitions.

The following definitions shall apply throughout this Ordinance.

A. "Constant first year dollars" shall mean an actual dollar amount which, in years subsequent to the first fiscal year the tax is levied, shall have the same purchasing price as the base amount in first fiscal year dollars as measured by the Consumer Price Index. The base amount shall be the amount of tax per parcel as specified in Section 3(A) herein. The adjustments from actual to constant dollars shall be made by use of the Consumer Price Index, as specified in Section 3(B) herein.

B. "Consumer Price Index" means the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Area as published by the U.S.

Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. If the Consumer Price Index is discontinued or revised, such other government index or computation with which it is replaced shall be used in order to obtain substantially the same result as would be obtained if the Consumer Price Index had not been discontinued or revised.

C. “Fiscal year" means the period of July 1 through the following June 30.

D. “Parcel" means the land and any improvements thereon, designated by an assessor’s parcel map and parcel number and carried on the secured property tax roll of Sacramento County. For the purposes of this Ordinance, parcel does not include any land or improvements outside the boundaries of Zone 31, nor any land or improvements owned by any governmental entity.

E. “Rancho Cordova Transit-Related Services Special Tax Area" means all the properties within the jurisdictional limits of the City of Rancho Cordova.

F. “Rancho Cordova Transit-Related Services Special Tax Area Zone 31 (the “Zone”) means that portion of the incorporated area of the City of Rancho Cordova located within the boundaries as shown on the map Exhibit A.

G. “Transit-Related Services” means providing, operating, maintaining and subsidizing transit services and all supporting facilities, infrastructure, programs and incentives that benefit the residents of the Rancho Cordova Transit-Related Services Special Tax Area, and shall be calculated and set according to the methodology described in Engineer’s Report County Service Area No. 10 and Benefit Zone No. 2 County of Sacramento, November 18, 2004, which established the methodology for the original service charge for Benefit Zone No. 2.

H. “Voter” means a person who owns real property within Zone 31, as shown on the last equalized assessment role prepared by the Sacramento County Assessor’s Office, at the time that the City Council adopts an ordinance authorizing the imposition of a transit- related services tax to the voters of Zone 31.

Section 3. Amount and Level of Taxes.

The tax per year on each parcel in the Zone shall not exceed the amount applicable to the parcel, as specified below.

Page 299 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.5. ATTACHMENT 3 Ordinance No. XX-2022 Page 3 of 5 A. For First Fiscal Year:

The tax per year for the first fiscal year (July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2023) shall be the amount of Tax per Parcel for a Land Use Code Category as set forth on Exhibit B hereto. The use code assigned to each parcel shall be reviewed and updated periodically.

Rates in Exhibit B shall be calculated and set according to the methodology described in Engineer’s Report County Service Area No. 10 and Benefit Zone No. 2 County of Sacramento, November 18, 2004, which established the methodology for the original service charge for Benefit Zone No. 2.

B. For Subsequent Fiscal Years:

In order to keep the tax on each parcel in constant first year dollars for each fiscal year subsequent to the first fiscal year, the tax per year shall be adjusted as set forth below to reflect any increase in the Consumer Price Index beyond the first fiscal year the tax is levied.

In June or July of each year, City Council shall determine the amount of taxes to be levied upon the parcels in Zone 31 for the then current fiscal year, as set forth below.

For each Land Use Category on Exhibit B, the tax per year on each parcel for each fiscal year subsequent to the first fiscal year shall be an amount determined as follows:

Tax Per Parcel
For then Current =
Fiscal Year
Tax Per Parcel
For Immediately
Preceding X
Fiscal Year
Consumer Price Index
from April of immediately
Preceding Fiscal Year to April of
then Current Fiscal Year
OR 6 percent, whichever is less
Provided, however, that in no event shall the tax per parcel for any fiscal year be less than the amount established for the first fiscal year.

C. Nature of Tax Levy.

The taxes levied on each parcel pursuant to this Article shall be a charge upon the parcel and shall be due and collectible as set forth in Section 4, below.

Section 4. Collection and Administration.

A. Taxes as Liens Against the Property.

The amount of taxes for each parcel each year shall constitute a lien on such property, in accordance with Revenue and Taxation Code Section 2187, and shall have the same effect as an ad valorem real property tax lien until fully paid.

B. Collection.

The taxes on each parcel shall be billed on the secured roll tax bills for ad valorem property taxes and are to be collected in the same manner in which Sacramento County collects secured roll ad valorem property taxes. Insofar as feasible and insofar as not inconsistent with this Ordinance, the times and procedures regarding exceptions, due dates,

Page 300 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.5. ATTACHMENT 3 Ordinance No. XX-2022 Page 4 of 5 installment payments, corrections, cancellations, refunds, late payments, penalties, liens, and collections for secured roll ad valorem property taxes (as established by Sacramento County) shall be applicable to the collection of this tax. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the foregoing, as to this tax:

1. The secured roll tax bills shall be the only notices required for this tax, and

2. The homeowners and veterans exemptions shall not be applicable because such exemptions are determined by dollar amount of value.

C. Costs of Administration by County.

The reasonable costs incurred by the County officers collecting and administering this tax shall be deducted from the collected taxes.

D. Use of Tax Revenue.

The revenue collected from the tax imposed by this ordinance shall be placed into a separate account and may be used only to fund transit-related services, including the costs of administering and collecting the tax and enforcing the provisions of this ordinance.

Revenue from the tax may be used for transit-related services citywide.

E. Refunds.

1. Whenever the amount of any tax, interest or penalty has been overpaid or paid more than once or has been erroneously or illegally collected or received by the City pursuant to this ordinance, it may be refunded as provided in this Section.

2. No refund may be made except upon a written claim verified by the person who paid the tax or by his or her guardian or conservator or the executor or administrator of his or her will or estate and stating the grounds upon which the claim is made. All claims filed pursuant to this subsection must be presented within one year after payment of the amount for which the claimant is seeking a refund.

3. No order of a refund may be made until a written claim therefor has been presented in accordance with this subsection. No suit for money, damages or a refund may be brought against the City until a written claim therefor has been presented to the City and has been acted upon or has been deemed rejected by the City, in accordance with this subsection. Only the person who filed the claim may bring such a suit, and if another person should do so, judgment shall not be rendered for the plaintiff.

F. Initiatives to Affect Tax.

Consistent with the California Constitution (art. XIIIC, § 3) the tax imposed by this ordinance may be affected by initiative. The procedures for qualification of such an initiative and the election on a qualified initiative shall be consistent with the California Constitution (art. 2, sec. 8), the California Elections Code (Chapter 3 of Division 9), and the Municipal Code. The minimum number of signatures necessary to qualify an initiative to affect the tax approved by this ordinance shall be equal to 5 percent of the votes in the City for all

Page 301 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.5. ATTACHMENT 3 Ordinance No. XX-2022 Page 5 of 5 candidates for Governor at the last gubernatorial election. The election on a qualified initiative to affect the tax shall be a regular citywide election. An initiative affecting the tax shall be approved only if at least two-thirds of the votes cast on the measure are in favor of its approval.

Section 5. Severability Clause.

If any article, section, subsection, sentence, phrase of clause of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance. The voters of Zone 31 hereby declare that they would have adopted the remainder of this Ordinance, including each article, section, subsection, sentenced phrase or clause, irrespective of the invalidity of any other article, section, subsection, sentence, phrase or clause.

Section 6. Effective Date and Posting.

This Ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its approval by two-thirds of the voters voting within the Zone in an election to be held on October 11, 2022 so that taxes shall first be collected hereunder for the tax year beginning July 1, 2023.

PASSED AND ADOPTED, THIS ____ day of ______ by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Donald Terry, Mayor
ATTEST:

Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

Page 302 of 600 ends

Legend
Annexation Boundary
Parcel Boundary
067-2410-001

RANCHO CORDOVA PKWY
067-2410-002
067-2420-003
067-2420-002
067-2410-004
067-2410-003

EXEMPT PARK
067-2410-008
067-2410-
007
067-2410-005
067-2420-005
067-2420-
006
067-2410-
006
067-2420-004

CHRYSANTHY BLVD

EXEMPT OPEN SPACE

EXEMPT OPEN SPACE
!

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

TRANSIT RELATED SERVICES SPECIAL TAX AREA
ANNEXATION 31
(THE RANCH PROJECT)
ITEM 10.5.

ATTACHMENT 4
Exhibit A to the Ordinance

Page 303 of 600 ends

ITEM 10.5. ATTACHMENT 5 Exhibit B to the Ordinance
Amount of Tax per Parcel by Land Use Category
A. Residential Dwelling Units
As adjusted for inflation from the original base year, the amount of Tax per Parcel for fiscal year 2022-2023 for Residential Land Use Categories shall be $126.16 per low density residential dwelling unit or low density residential dwelling unit equivalent, $100.93 per medium density residential dwelling unit or medium density residential dwelling unit equivalent, or $75.70 per high density residential dwelling unit or high density residential dwelling unit equivalent (Multi-family residential units on a single parcel shall be assessed on a proportionately equivalent basis (e.g., a two-unit attached housing structure, such as a duplex, would be deemed to consist of two residential parcels for purposes of the Transit- Related Services Special Tax).

B. Non-Residential
As adjusted for inflation from the original base year, the amount of Tax per Parcel for fiscal year 2022-2023 for Non-Residential Land Use Categories (except Recreational and Agricultural) shall be $3,234.74 per retail and service commercial acre, $2,780.57 per commercial mixed use or office commercial acre, and $1,142.75 per light industrial acre.

C. Inflator Formula
The tax is subject to an annual inflator formula based on the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U) for the San Francisco-Oakland-San Jose Area, or six percent, whichever is less.

Page 304 of 600 ends

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 3

ITEM 12.1.

DATE: September 6, 2022

TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members

FROM: Michelle Mingay, Senior Finance Analyst

SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX

BONDS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RANCHO
CORDOVA THE RANCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.
2021-1, APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A

FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENT, APPROVING THE FORM OF

PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT, APPROVING SALE OF

SUCH BONDS, AND APPROVING OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS

AND ACTIONS

RECOMMENDATION

Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION

Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the sale of Special Tax Bonds (the “Bonds”) for and on behalf of the Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 for the purpose of providing money for the acquisition and construction of improvements, and the payment of certain development impact fees related to the project, within the Community Facilities District.

BACKGROUND

The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (“CFD 2021-1”) or (the “District”) was formed in 2021 to assist in the financing of the acquisition and construction of certain public facilities and payment of certain fees within a portion of the Ranch project. Through various City Council actions, the City Council has declared the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in a maximum principal amount not to exceed $86,470,000 and set an annual appropriations limit of $20,350,000 for the territory within Improvement Area No. 1.

Based on the current status of the property within the District, the appraisal estimates the value of the property within the District at approximately $59.6 million. This has created an opportunity for the District to issue special tax bonds. Based on the expected bond par amount, the property value compared to bonded debt lien would exceed the required 4:1 value to lien requirement, which is consistent with prior special tax bonds issued within the City.

The proposed financing-related resolution approves: (i) the sale of the Bonds in an amount not to exceed $14 million; (ii) a Fiscal Agent Agreement; (iii) the Preliminary Official Statement; (iv)

Page 305 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 3

Bond Purchase Agreement, and authorizes related documents on behalf of the District. Descriptions of these documents are as follows:
 Fiscal Agent Agreement: The Fiscal Agent Agreement allows U.S. Bank to act on behalf of the City to provide for the issuance of the Bonds, the disbursement of proceeds of the Bonds, the disposition of the special taxes securing the Bonds, and the administration and payment of the
Bonds.

 Bond Purchase Agreement: The Bond Purchase Agreement is a legally binding document between the issuer (City on behalf of the District) and an underwriter (Piper Sandler & Co.) establishing the terms of the Bond sale. After the issuer delivers the Bonds to the underwriter, and the underwriter pays the issuer for them, the underwriter will put the Bonds on the market at the price and yield established during the Bond pricing call, currently scheduled for the week of September 19th, and investors will purchase the Bonds from the
underwriter.

 Preliminary Official Statement: The preliminary Official Statement is a document that serves as the prospectus for the Bonds. It is the disclosure document relied on by Bond investors that details the underlying security for the Bonds and all associated investment risks. The Official Statement is the offering document used by the underwriter to market the Bonds and indicated how investors in the Bonds will be repaid.

Assuming the City Council approves this financing, staff will work with the Bond finance team to determining the final Bond sizing, and the preliminary Official Statement will be finalized and posted electronically for investors to review. Assuming the market remains stable, the City; NHA Advisors, LLC, the City’s Municipal Advisor; and Piper Sandler & Co., the bond underwriter, will hold a pre-pricing call the week of September 19th to review bond market conditions and the preliminary interest rates, after which, the Bonds will be sold. An authorized officer will then execute, on behalf of the City, a Bond Purchase Agreement with Piper Sandler & Co., finalizing the bond interest rates and setting the delivery date, which is anticipated to occur the week of October 3rd.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

There is no fiscal impact. The Special Tax Bonds are secured solely by the Special Taxes levies within the District and are not a debt of the City’s General Fund. Costs of issuance are payable solely from Bond proceeds.

In accordance with Government Code 5852.1, the following information consists of estimates of certain costs and charges for the Bonds that have been provided by NHA Advisors, LLC, the City’s municipal advisor, which has been represented by such party to have been provided in good faith: (1) estimated true interest cost of the Bonds: 5.26%; (2) estimated finance charge of the Bonds (sum of all fees and charges paid to third parties): $611,188; (3) estimated amount of proceeds of the Bonds received by the City (net of finance charges, reserves and capitalized interest, if any): $10,798,000; and (4) estimated total payment amount (sum total of all payments to pay debt service on the Bonds plus the finance charge not paid with proceeds

Page 306 of 600 ends

City Council Staff Report - Page 3 of 3

of the Bonds) calculated to the final maturity of the Bonds: $27,203,117.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Fiscal Agent Agreement

3. BPA - City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch CFD 2021-1 IA 1 2022 Bonds

4. POS - The Ranch CFD 2021-1; 2022 Bonds

Page 307 of 600 ends

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 1 of 5

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2022

A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF SPECIAL TAX BONDS FOR AND ON BEHALF OF IMPROVEMENT AREA NO. 1 OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA THE RANCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2021-1, APPROVING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF A FISCAL

AGENT AGREEMENT AND AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT, APPROVING

THE FORM OF PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT, APPROVING SALE

OF SUCH BONDS, AND APPROVING OTHER RELATED DOCUMENTS AND

ACTIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted proceedings under and pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the “Act”), to (i) establish the City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (the “CFD”), (ii) designate within the CFD, “Improvement Area No. 1 of the City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1” (“Improvement Area No. 1”), and (iii) establish a “City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Future Annexation Area)” for the CFD (the “Future Annexation Area”); and
WHEREAS, under the Act, the City Council is authorized to issue bonded indebtedness secured by special taxes levied within the CFD and improvement areas therein for the purpose of providing moneys for the construction and acquisition of improvements, and the payment of certain fees, authorized for the CFD; and
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2021, the City Council, as legislative body of the CFD and Improvement Area No. 1, established the bonded indebtedness limit for the CFD in the principal amount of not to exceed $86,470,000 (excluding bonds described in Section 53364.2(e) of the Act) (the “Authorization”), initially allocated as follows: (i) for Improvement Area No. 1, $20,350,000 and (ii) for land within the Future Annexation Area, $66,120,000; and WHEREAS, the City desires to issue the first series of special tax bonds for Improvement Area No. 1 of the CFD pursuant to the Authorization; and WHEREAS, there has been submitted to the City Council a Fiscal Agent Agreement, between the City and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as fiscal agent (the “Fiscal Agent Agreement”), providing for the issuance of a first series of special tax bonds of the City for Improvement Area No. 1, designated as the “City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 Improvement Area No. 1 Special Tax Bonds Series 2022” (the “Bonds”), and the City Council, with the aid of City staff, has reviewed the Fiscal Agent Agreement and found it to be in proper order for the purpose intended, and now desires to approve the Fiscal Agent Agreement and the issuance of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the City proposes to sell the Bonds to Piper Sandler & Co., as underwriter (the “Underwriter”), pursuant to the terms of a Bond Purchase Agreement (the “Bond Purchase Agreement”) by and between the City and the Underwriter, and the Underwriter proposes to offer the Bonds to the investing public by means of a Preliminary Official Statement (the “Preliminary Official Statement”); and

Page 308 of 600 ends

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 2 of 5
WHEREAS, there has been placed on file with the City Clerk a form of Funding, Construction and Acquisition Agreement (the “Acquisition Agreement”) providing for certain CFD authorized facilities to be acquired by the City from K. Hovnanian at Jaeger Ranch, LLC, as the developer of the land within the District, or an affiliate or assignee, and the City Council, with the assistance of staff, has reviewed the Acquisition Agreement and found it to be in proper order, and now desires to approve such agreement; and
WHEREAS, there has been placed on file with the City Clerk a form of a Joint Community Facilities Agreement by and between the City, for and on behalf of the CFD, and the Cordova Recreation and Park District (CRPD) (the “Joint Community Facilities Agreement”) providing for certain CFD authorized facilities to be acquired by CRPD pursuant to Section 53316.2 of the Act, and the City Council, with the assistance of staff, has reviewed the Joint Community Facilities Agreement and found it to be in proper order, and now desires to approve such agreement; and
WHEREAS, the information required to be obtained and disclosed with respect to the Bonds in accordance with Government Code Section 5852.1 is set forth in the staff report accompanying this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, all conditions, things and acts required to exist and to have been performed precedent to and with respect to the issuance of the Bonds and the levy of the special taxes securing the Bonds, as contemplated by this resolution and the Fiscal Agent Agreement, have happened and exist as required by the laws of the State of California, including the Act, and the actions to be performed in due time for the issuance of the Bonds conform in form and manner to the applicable laws of the State of California, including the Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA:

SECTION 1. Findings. This Council finds and determines that (i) it is prudent in the management and development of land in the City and the CFD to issue the Bonds to provide money for the construction and acquisition of improvements, and the payment of certain fees, authorized for the CFD, and (ii) the Bonds and the CFD are substantially in compliance with the City’s Statement of Policies and Procedures for Special Assessment and Community Facilities District Debt Financing Programs.

SECTION 2. Law Applicable. For the purposes of these proceedings in and for the CFD, the Act shall be the authority for the issuance of the Bonds.

SECTION 3. Bonds Authorized. Pursuant to the Act, this Resolution and the Fiscal Agent Agreement, the Bonds, in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $14,000,000, are hereby authorized to be issued. The Bonds shall be executed in the form set forth in, and otherwise as provided in, the Fiscal Agent Agreement. The Bonds shall be dated and executed in the forms, be in the principal amounts, denominations, mature, be payable at the place and in the priorities and bear interest at the rates as set forth in and otherwise as provided in the Fiscal Agent Agreement.

The Bonds shall not be issued unless the value of the real property within Improvement Area No. 1 subject to the special tax to pay debt service on the Bonds, based on assessed values and/or an appraisal by an independent appraiser hired by the City for the purpose of determining such value, is at least four times the proposed principal amount of the Bonds

Page 309 of 600 ends

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 3 of 5
proposed to be issued and secured by a special tax levied pursuant to the Act on property within Improvement Area No. 1.

SECTION 4. Fiscal Agent Agreement. The Fiscal Agent Agreement is hereby approved. The date, manner of payment, interest rate or rates, interest payment dates, denominations, form, registration privileges, manner of execution, place of payment, terms of redemption and other terms of the Bonds shall be as provided in the Fiscal Agent Agreement, as finally executed. The terms and provisions of the Fiscal Agent Agreement, as finally executed, are incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth herein.

The City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services Director or such other person or persons as any of them may designate (each an “Authorized Officer”) are hereby separately authorized and directed to execute and deliver the Fiscal Agent Agreement in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, with such additions thereto or changes therein as are approved by the Authorized Officer upon consultation with the City’s bond counsel, and including but not limited to such additions or changes as are necessary or advisable to permit the timely issuance, sale and delivery of the Bonds; provided, however, that no additions or changes shall authorize the issuance of an aggregate principal amount of Bonds which would cause bonds issued for Improvement Area No. 1 to be in excess of the Authorization. The approval of such additions or changes shall be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery of the Fiscal Agent Agreement by an Authorized Officer.

SECTION 5. Bond Preparation and Delivery; Sale of the Bonds. The Bonds, when executed, shall be delivered to the fiscal agent for authentication. The fiscal agent is hereby requested and directed to authenticate the Bonds by executing the fiscal agent’s certificate of authentication and registration appearing thereon, and to deliver the Bonds, when duly executed and authenticated, to the Underwriter in accordance with written instructions executed on behalf of the City by the Mayor and/or an Authorized Officer, which instructions are hereby authorized, for and in the name and on behalf of the City, to be delivered.

SECTION 6. Covenant to Foreclose. The City hereby covenants, for the benefit of the owners of the Bonds, to commence and diligently pursue to completion any foreclosure action regarding delinquent installments of any amount levied as a special tax for the payment of debt service on the Bonds, said foreclosure action to be commenced and pursued as more completely set forth in the Fiscal Agent Agreement.

SECTION 7. Approval of Preliminary Official Statement. The City Council hereby approves the Preliminary Official Statement in substantially the form presented to the City Council at this meeting. The Authorized Officers are each hereby authorized and directed to execute a final Official Statement (the “Official Statement”), for and in the name and on behalf of the City, in such form, together with any additions thereto or changes therein deemed necessary or advisable by the Authorized Officer executing such document upon consultation with the City’s bond counsel. The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the Underwriter to distribute copies of the Preliminary Official Statement to persons who may be interested in the purchase of the Bonds and to deliver copies of the Official Statement to all actual purchasers of the Bonds. The City Council hereby authorizes the delivery of the Preliminary Official Statement and the Official Statement.

The City Council hereby authorizes and directs an Authorized Officer, on behalf of the City, to deem “final,” pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Preliminary Official Statement prior to its distribution to prospective purchasers of the Bonds.

Page 310 of 600 ends

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 4 of 5
SECTION 8. Approval of Purchase Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the Bond Purchase Agreement; provided, however, that the aggregate principal amount of Bonds shall not exceed $14,000,000 or result in an Underwriter’s discount in excess of 1.25%, or a true interest cost in excess of 6.25%. Subject to the foregoing parameters, an Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Bond Purchase Agreement in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, together with such changes and additions thereto deemed advisable by the Authorized Officer executing the same. The City Council hereby finds and determines that the sale of the Bonds at negotiated sale as contemplated by the Bond Purchase Agreement will result in a lower overall cost.

SECTION 9. Approval of Acquisition Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the Acquisition Agreement. An Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Acquisition Agreement in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, together with such changes and additions thereto deemed advisable by the Authorized Officer executing the same.

SECTION 10. Approval of Joint Facilities Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the Joint Community Facilities Agreement. An Authorized Officer is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Joint Community Facilities Agreement in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, together with such changes and additions thereto deemed advisable by the Authorized Officer executing the same.

SECTION 11. Actions Authorized. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the City with respect to the establishment of the CFD and the designation of Improvement Area No. 1 therein, and the sale and issuance of the Bonds are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified, and the Authorized Officers are hereby authorized and directed to do any and all things and take any and all actions and execute any and all certificates, agreements and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the lawful issuance and delivery of the Bonds in accordance with this Resolution, and any certificate, agreement, and other document described in the documents herein approved. All actions to be taken by an Authorized Officer as specified herein, may be taken by the Authorized Officer or any designee, with the same force and effect as if taken by such Authorized Officer.

SECTION 12. Effectiveness. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption.

Page 311 of 600 ends

ITEM 12.1. ATTACHMENT 1 Resolution No. XX-2022 Page 5 of 5
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the _____ day of ___________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________________
Donald Terry, Mayor
ATTEST:

Stacy Leitner, CMC, City Clerk

Page 312 of 600 ends

Jones Hall Draft of August 29, 2022
FI

SCAL AGENT AGREEMENT
by and between

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
and
U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
as Fiscal Agent
Dated as of ___________ 1, 2022
Relating to:
$___________
City of Rancho Cordova
The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1
Improvement Area No. 1
Special Tax Bonds
Series 2022
ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 313 of 600 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ARTICLE I

STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND DEFINITIONS
Section 1.01. Authority for this Agreement ........................................................................... 2 Section 1.02. Agreement for Benefit of Bondowners ............................................................ 2 Section 1.03. Definitions ....................................................................................................... 2

ARTICLE II

THE BONDS
Section 2.01. Principal Amount; Designation ...................................................................... 11 Section 2.02. Terms of 2022 Bonds .................................................................................... 11 Section 2.03. Redemption ................................................................................................... 12 Section 2.04. Form of Bonds .............................................................................................. 15 Section 2.05. Execution of Bonds ....................................................................................... 15 Section 2.06. Transfer of Bonds ......................................................................................... 16 Section 2.07. Exchange of Bonds ....................................................................................... 16 Section 2.08. Bond Register ............................................................................................... 16 Section 2.09. Temporary Bonds ......................................................................................... 16 Section 2.10. Bonds Mutilated, Lost, Destroyed or Stolen .................................................. 17 Section 2.11. Limited Obligation ......................................................................................... 17 Section 2.12. Book-Entry Only System ............................................................................... 17 Section 2.13. No Acceleration ............................................................................................. 18

ARTICLE III

ISSUANCE OF BONDS
Section 3.01. Issuance and Delivery of Bonds ................................................................... 19 Section 3.02. Application of Proceeds of Sale of Bonds and Collection of Special Tax ..... 19 Section 3.03. Special Tax Fund .......................................................................................... 19 Section 3.04. Improvement Fund ........................................................................................ 20 Section 3.05. 2022 Costs of Issuance Fund ....................................................................... 21

ARTICLE IV
SPECIAL TAX REVENUES; BOND FUND AND RESERVE
FUND
Section 4.01. Pledge of Special Tax Revenues and Other Amounts. ................................. 22 Section 4.02. Bond Fund .................................................................................................... 22 Section 4.03. Reserve Fund ............................................................................................... 23

ARTICLE V

OTHER COVENANTS OF THE CITY
Section 5.01. Punctual Payment ......................................................................................... 26 Section 5.02. Limited Obligation ......................................................................................... 26 Section 5.03. Extension of Time for Payment ..................................................................... 26 Section 5.04. Against Encumbrances ................................................................................. 26 Section 5.05. Books and Accounts ..................................................................................... 26 Section 5.06. Protection of Security and Rights of Owners ................................................ 26 Section 5.07. Compliance with Law; Completion of Project ................................................ 27 Section 5.08. Private Activity Bond Limitation ..................................................................... 27 Section 5.09. Federal Guarantee Prohibition ...................................................................... 27 Section 5.10. Collection of Special Tax Revenues ............................................................. 27 Section 5.11. Further Assurances ....................................................................................... 27 ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 314 of 600 ends

ii
Section 5.12. No Arbitrage .................................................................................................. 28 Section 5.13. Maintenance of Tax-Exemption .................................................................... 28 Section 5.14. Annual State Reports .................................................................................... 28 Section 5.15. Covenant to Foreclose .................................................................................. 28 Section 5.16. Continuing Disclosure to Owners .................................................................. 29 Section 5.17. Additional Bonds ........................................................................................... 29 Section 5.18. Yield of the Bonds ......................................................................................... 29

ARTICLE VI
INVESTMENTS; DISPOSITION OF INVESTMENT PROCEEDS;

LIABILITY OF THE CITY
Section 6.01. Deposit and Investment of Moneys in Funds ................................................ 30 Section 6.02. Rebate of Excess Investment Earnings to the United States ....................... 31 Section 6.03. Limited Obligation ......................................................................................... 31

ARTICLE VII

THE FISCAL AGENT
Section 7.01. Appointment of Fiscal Agent ......................................................................... 32 Section 7.02. Liability of Fiscal Agent ................................................................................. 32 Section 7.03. Information .................................................................................................... 33 Section 7.04. Notice to Fiscal Agent ................................................................................... 33 Section 7.05. Compensation, Indemnification ..................................................................... 34

ARTICLE VIII

MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT OF THIS AGREEMENT
Section 8.01. Amendments Permitted ................................................................................ 35 Section 8.02. Owners’ Meetings ......................................................................................... 35 Section 8.03. Procedure for Amendment with Written Consent of Owners ........................ 35 Section 8.04. Disqualified Bonds ........................................................................................ 36 Section 8.05. Effect of Supplemental Agreement ............................................................... 36 Section 8.06. Endorsement or Replacement of Bonds Issued After Amendments ............. 37 Section 8.07. Amendatory Endorsement of Bonds ............................................................. 37 Section 8.08. Opinion of Counsel Regarding Supplemental Agreement ............................ 37

ARTICLE IX

MISCELLANEOUS
Section 9.01. Benefits of Agreement Limited to Parties ...................................................... 38 Section 9.02. Successor is Deemed Included in All References to Predecessor ............... 38 Section 9.03. Discharge of Agreement ............................................................................... 38 Section 9.04. Execution of Documents and Proof of Ownership by Owners ...................... 39 Section 9.05. Waiver of Personal Liability ........................................................................... 39 Section 9.06. Notices to and Demands on City and Fiscal Agent ....................................... 39 Section 9.07. Partial Invalidity ............................................................................................. 40 Section 9.08. Unclaimed Moneys ....................................................................................... 40 Section 9.09. Applicable Law .............................................................................................. 40 Section 9.10. Conflict with Act ............................................................................................ 40 Section 9.11. Conclusive Evidence of Regularity ............................................................... 40 Section 9.12. Payment on Business Day ............................................................................ 40 Section 9.13. Counterparts ................................................................................................. 40

EXHIBIT A FORM OF BOND
ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 315 of 600 ends

FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENT

THIS FISCAL AGENT AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into and dated as of ___________ 1, 2022 , by and between the City of Rancho Cordova, California, a municipal corporation and public body, corporate and politic, organized and existing under and by virtue of the Constitution and laws of the State of California (the “City”) for and on behalf of the City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (the “District”), and U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association , a national banking association duly organized and existing under the laws of the United States of America with a corporate trust office located in Seattle, Washington, as fiscal agent (the “Fiscal Agent”).

W I T N E S S E T H :

WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted proceedings under and pursuant to the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the “Act”), to (i) establish the District (ii) designate within the District, “Improvement Area No. 1 of the City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1” (“Improvement Area No. 1”), and (iii) establish a “City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 (Future Annexation Area)” for the District (the “Future Annexation Area”); and

WHEREAS, the City Council, as the legislative body of the District and Improvement Area No. 1, is authorized under the Act to levy special taxes to pay for the costs of facilities authorized for the District and to issue bonds secured by said special taxes under the Act;

WHEREAS, under the provisions of the Act, on ____________, 2022, the City Council of the City adopted its Resolution No. _____-2022 (the “Resolution”), which resolution authorized the issuance of the City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 Improvement Area No. 1 Special Tax Bonds Series 2022 to provide moneys for the construction and acquisition of improvements for the District and provided that said issuance would be in accordance with the Act and this Agreement, and authorized the execution hereof;

WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and for the benefit of the City, the District, the persons responsible for the payment of special taxes and the Owners of the Bonds that the City enter into this Agreement to provide for the issuance of the Bonds, the disbursement of proceeds of the Bonds, the disposition of the special taxes securing the Bonds authorized to be issued hereunder and the administration and payment of the Bonds; and

WHEREAS, the City has determined that all things necessary to cause the Bonds, wh en authenticated by the City for the District and issued as in the Act, the Resolution and this Agreement provided to be legal, valid and binding and special obligations of the City for the District in accordance with their terms, and all things necessary to cause the creation, authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement and the creation, authorization, execution and issuance of the Bonds, subject to the terms hereof, have in all respects been duly authorized.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration o f the covenants and provisions herein set forth and for other valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:

ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 316 of 600 ends

2 ARTICLE I

AUTHORITY AND DEFINITIONS STATUTORY AUTHORITY AND

DEFINITIONS

Section 1.01. Authority for this Agreement. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the provisions of the Act and the Resolution.

Section 1.02. Agreement for Benefit of Bondowners . The provisions, covenants and agreements herein set forth to be performed by or on behalf of the City shall be for the equal benefit, protection and security of the Owners. All of the Bonds, without regard to the time or times of their issuance or maturity, shall be of equal rank without preference, priority or distinction of any of the Bonds over any other thereof, except as expressly provided in or permitted by this Agreement. The Fiscal Agent may become the Owner of any of the Bonds in its own or any other capacity with the same rights it would have if it were not Fiscal Agent.

Section 1.03. Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Section 1.03 shall, for all purposes of this Agreement, of any Supplemental Agreement, and of any certificate, opinion or other document herein mention ed, have the meanings herein specified. All references herein to “Articles,” “Sections” and other subdivisions are to the corresponding Articles, Sections or subdivisions of this Agreement, and the words “herein,” “hereof,” “hereunder” and other words of similar import refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular Article, Section or subdivision hereof.

“Acquisition Agreement” means the Funding, Construction and Acquisition Agreement, dated as of _________, 2022, by and between the City and ____________ [K. Hovnanian at Jaeger Ranch, LLC, a California limited liability company?], and any amendments thereto.

“Act” means the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Sections 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code.

“Additional Bonds ” means any series of bonds other than the 2022 Bonds issued pursuant to Section 5.17 hereof.

“Administrative Expense Priority” means (i) for fiscal year 2022-23, $30,000, and (ii) for each subsequent year, an amount equal to the preceding fiscal year ’s Administrative Expense Priority plus an additional 2% of such amount.

“Administrative Expenses” means any or all of the following: the fees and expenses of the Fiscal Agent (including any fees or expenses of its counsel), the expenses of the City in carrying out its duties hereunder (including, but not limited to, the levying and collection of the Special Taxes, and the foreclosure of the liens of delinquent Special Taxes) including the fees and expenses of its counsel, an allocable share of the salaries of City staff directly related thereto and a proportionate amount of City general administrative overhead related thereto, any amounts paid by the City from its general funds pursuant to Section 6.02, and all other costs and expenses of the City or the Fiscal Agent incurred in connection with the issuance and administration of the Bonds and/or the discharge of their respective duties hereunder (including, but not limited to, the calculation of the levy of the Special Taxes, foreclosures with respect to delinquent taxes, and the calculation of amounts subject to rebate to the United States) and, in the case of the City, in any way related to the administration of the District and Improvement ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 317 of 600 ends

3 Area No. 1. Administrative Expenses shall include any such expenses incurred in prior years but not yet paid, and any advances of funds by the City under Section 6.02 hereof.

“Administrative Services Director” means the Administrative Services Director, including any acting or interim Administrative Services Director, of the City, or person serving in a similar capacity, or a designee of such person.

“Agreement” means this Fiscal Agent Agreement, as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time by any Supplemental Agreement.

“Annual Debt Service” means, for each Bond Year, the sum of (i) the interest due on the Outstanding Bonds in such Bond Year, assuming that the Outstanding Bonds are retired as scheduled, and (ii) the principal amount of the Outstanding Bonds, including any mandatory sinking fund payments, due in such Bond Year.

“Authorization” means a principal amount of Bonds for Improvement Area No. 1 not to exceed $20,350,000 (excluding bonds described in Section 53364.2(e) of the Act).

“Authorized Officer ” means the City Manager, Deputy City Manager, Administrative Services Director or any other officer or employee authorized by the City Council of the City or by an Authorized Officer to undertake the action referenced in this Agreement as required to be undertaken by an Authorized Officer.

“Bond Counsel ” means any attorney or firm of attorneys acceptable to the City and nationally recognized for expertise in rendering opinions as to the legality and tax-exempt status of securities issued by public entities.

“Bond Fund ” means the fund by that name established pursuant to Section 4.02(A) hereof.

“Bond Year” means each twelve -month period beginning on September 2 in any year and extending to the next succeeding September 1, both dates inclusive; except that the first Bond Year shall begin on the Closing Date and end on September 1, 2023.

“Bonds” means (i) the 2022 Bonds any (ii) Additional Bonds at any time Outstanding under this Agreement and any Supplemental Agreement.

“Business Day” means any day other than (i) a Saturday or a Sunday or (ii) a day on which banking institutions in the state in which the Principal Office of the Fiscal Agent is located are authorized or obligated by law or executive order to be closed.

“CDIAC” means the California Debt and Investment Adv isory Commission of the office of the State Treasurer of the State of California or any successor agency or bureau thereto.

“City” means the City of Rancho Cordova, California, and any successor thereto.

“Closing Date” means the date upon which there is a physical delivery of the Bonds in exchange for the amount representing the purchase price of the Bonds by the Original Purchaser.

ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 318 of 600 ends

4 “Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as in effect on the date of issuance of the Bonds or (except as otherwise referenced herein) as it may be amended to apply to obligations issued on the date of issuance of the Bonds, together with applicable temporary and final regulations promulgated, and applicable official public guidance published, under the Code.

“Continuing Disclosure Certificate” means the Continuing Disclosure Certificate, dated as of ___________ 1, 2022, by and among the City and Goodwin Consulting Group, Inc., in its capacity as Dissemination Agent, as originally executed and as it may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof.

“Cost of Issuance” means items of expense payable or reimbursable directly or indirectly by the City and related to the authorization, sale and issuance of the Bonds, which items of expense shall include, but not be limited to, printing costs, costs of reproducing and bindi ng documents, closing costs, filing and recording fees, initial fees, expenses and charges of the Fiscal Agent including its first annual administration fee, expenses incurred by the City in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, financial advisor fees, Bond (underwriter’s) discount or underwriting fee, legal fees and charges, including bond counsel, charges for execution, transportation and safekeeping of the Bonds and other costs, charges and fees in connection with the foregoing.

“DTC” means the Depository Trust Company, and its successors and assigns.

“Debt Service ” means the scheduled amount of interest and amortization of principal payable on the Bonds during the period of computation, excluding amounts scheduled during such period which relate to principal which has been retired before the beginning of such period.

“Debt Service Account ” means the account of the Special Tax Fund by that name established by Section 3.03(A) hereof.

“Depository” means (a) initially, DTC, and (b) any other Securiti es Depository acting as Depository pursuant to Section 2.12.

“District” means the City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1, established pursuant to the Resolution of Formation.

“Fair Market Value ” means the price at which a willing buyer would purchase the investment from a willing seller in a bona fide, arm’s length transaction (determined as of the date the contract to purchase or sell the investment becomes binding) if the investment is traded on an established securities market (within the meaning of Section 1273 of the Code) and, otherwise, the term “Fair Market Value” means the acquisition price in a bona fide arm ’s length transaction (as referenced above) if (i) the investment is a certificate of deposit that is acquired in accordance with applicable regulations under the Code, (ii) the investment is an agreement with specifically negotiated withdrawal or reinvestment provisions and a specifically negotiated interest rate (for example, a guaranteed investment contract , a forward supply contract or other investment agreement) that is acquired in accordance with applicable regulations under the Code, (iii) the investment is a United States Treasury Security —State and Local Government Series that is acquired in accordance with applicable regulations of the United States Bureau of Public Debt, or (iv) the investment is the Local Agency Investment Fund of the State of California, but only if at all times during which the investment is held its yield is reasonably expected to be equal to or greater than the yield on a reasonably comparable direct obligation of the United States.

ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 319 of 600 ends

5 “Federal Securities” means any of the following which are non -callable and which at the time of investment are legal investments under the laws of th e State of California for funds held by the Fiscal Agent (the Fiscal Agent entitled to rely upon investment direction from the City as a certification that such investment constitutes a legal investment).

(i) Direct general obligations of the United State s of America (including obligations issued or held in book-entry form on the books of the United States Department of the Treasury) and obligations, the payment of principal of and interest on which are directly or indirectly guaranteed by the United State s of America, including, without limitation, such of the foregoing which are commonly referred to as “stripped” obligations and coupons; or

(ii) Any of the following obligations of the following agencies of the United States of America: (i) direct obligations of the Export -Import Bank, (ii) certificates of beneficial ownership issued by the Farmers Home Administration, (iii) participation certificates issued by the General Services Administration, (iv) mortgage-backed bonds or pass-through obligations issued and guaranteed by the Government National Mortgage Association, (v) project notes issued by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, and (vi) public housing notes and bonds guaranteed by the United States of America.

“Fiscal Agent ” means the Fiscal Agent appointed by the City and acting as an independent fiscal agent with the duties and powers herein provided, its successors and assigns, and any other corporation or association which may at any time be substituted in its place, as provided in Section 7.01.

“Fiscal Year” means the twelve-month period extending from July 1 in a calendar year to June 30 of the succeeding year, both dates inclusive.

“Improvement Area No. 1” means Improvement Area No. 1 of the City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021 -1, designated pursuant to the Resolution of Formation.

“Improvement Fund ” means the fund by that name established pursuant to Section 3.04(A) hereof.

“Interest Payment Dates” means March 1 and September 1 of each year, commencing March 1, 2023.

“Maximum Annual Debt Service” means the largest Annual Debt Service for any Bond Year after the calculation is made through the final maturity date of any Outstanding Bonds.

“Net Maximum Annual Special Taxes ” means the largest amount of Special Taxes allowed to be levied for any Bond Year, net of the Administrative Expense Priority.

“Officer’s Certificate ” means a written certificate of the City signed by an Authorized Officer of the City.

“Ordinance” means any ordinance of the City levying the Special Taxes.

“Original Purchaser” means the first purchaser of the Bonds from the City.

ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 320 of 600 ends

6 “Outstanding,” when used as of any particular time with reference to Bonds, means (subject to the provisions of Section 8.04) all Bonds except (i) Bonds theretofore canceled by the Fiscal Agent or surrendered to the Fiscal Agent for cancellation; (ii) Bonds paid or deemed to have been paid within the meaning of Section 9.03; and (iii) Bonds in lieu of or in substitution for which other Bonds shall have been authorized, executed, issued and delivered by the City pursuant to the Agreement or any Supplemental Agreement.

“Owner” or “Bondowner” means any person who shall be the registered owner of any Outstanding Bond.

“Participating Underwriter” shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the Continuing Disclosure Certificate.

“Permitted Investments” means any of the following, to the extent t hat they are lawful investments for City funds at the time of investment, and are acquired at Fair Market Value (the Fiscal Agent entitled to rely upon investment direction from the City as a certification that such investment constitutes a legal investment):

(i) Federal Securities;

(ii) any of following obligations of federal agencies not guaranteed by the United States of America: (a) debentures issued by the Federal Housing Administration; (b) participation certificates or senior debt obligations of t he Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation or Farm Credit Banks (consisting of Federal Land Banks, Federal Intermediate Credit Banks or Banks for Cooperatives); (c) bonds or debentures of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board established under the Federal Home L oan Bank Act, bonds of any federal home loan bank established under said act and stocks, bonds, debentures, participations and other obligations of or issued by the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Student Loan Marketing Association, the Governme nt National Mortgage Association and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation; and bonds, notes or other obligations issued or assumed by the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development;

(iii) interest-bearing demand or time deposits (includin g certificates of deposit) in federal or State of California chartered banks (including the Fiscal Agent), provided that (a) in the case of a savings and loan association, such demand or time deposits shall be fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the unsecured obligations of such savings and loan association shall be rated in one of the top two rating categories by a nationally recognized rating service, and (b) in the case of a bank, such demand or time deposits shall be fully ins ured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or the unsecured obligations of such bank (or the unsecured obligations of the parent bank holding company of which such bank is the lead bank) shall be rated in one of the top two rating categories by a nationally recognized rating service;

(iv) repurchase agreements with a registered broker/dealer subject to the Securities Investors Protection Corporation Liquidation in the event of insolvency, or any commercial bank provided that: (a) the unsecured obligations of such bank shall be rated in one of the top two rating categories by a nationally recognized rating service, or such bank shall be the lead bank of a banking holding company whose unsecured obligations ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 321 of 600 ends

7 are rated in one of the top two rating categories by a nationally recognized rating service; (b) the most recent reported combined capital, surplus an undivided profits of such bank shall be not less than $100 million; (c) the repurchase obligation under any such repurchase obligation shall be requ ired to be performed in not more than 30 days; (d) the entity holding such securities as described in clause (c) shall have a pledged first security interest therein for the benefit of the Fiscal Agent under the California Commercial Code or pursuant to th e book- entry procedures described by 31 C.F.R. 306.1 et seq. or 31 C.F.R. 350.0 et seq. and are rated in one of the top two rating categories by a nationally recognized rating service;

(v) bankers acceptances endorsed and guaranteed by banks described in clause (iv) above;

(vi) obligations, the interest on which is exempt from federal income taxation under Section 103 of the Code and which are rated in the one of the top two rating categories by a nationally recognized rating service;

(vii) money market funds which invest solely in Federal Securities or in obligations described in the preceding clause (ii) of this definition, or money market funds which are rated in the highest rating category by Standard & Poor ’s Ratings Services or Moody’s Investor Service, including funds which are managed or maintained by the Fiscal Agent;

(viii) units of a taxable government money market portfolio comprised solely of obligations listed in (i) and (iv) above;

(ix) any investment which is a legal investment for proceeds of the Bonds at the time of the execution of such agreement, and which investment is made pursuant to an agreement between the City or the Fiscal Agent or any successor Fiscal Agent and a financial institution or governmental body whose long term debt o bligations are rated in one of the top two rating categories by a nationally recognized rating service;

(x) commercial paper of “prime” quality of the highest ranking or of the highest letter and numerical rating as provided for by Moody’s Investors Service, or Standard and Poor’s Corporation, of issuing corporations that are organized and operating within the United States and having total assets in excess of $500,000,000 , and having a rating of at least “AA” (without regard to qualifier) for the issuer ’s debentures, other than commercial paper, as provided for by Moody’s Investors Service or Standard and Poor’s Corporation, and provided that purchases of eligible commercial paper may not exceed 180 days maturi ty nor represent more than 10 percent of the outstanding paper of an issuing corporation;

(xi) any general obligation of a bank or insurance company whose long term debt obligations are rated in one of the two highest rating categories of a national ratin g service;

(xii) shares in a common law trust established pursuant to Title 1, Division 7, Charter 5 of the Government Code of the State which invests exclusively in investments permitted by Section 53635 of Title 5, Division 2, Chapter 4 of the Government Code of the State, as it may be amended;

ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 322 of 600 ends

8 (xiii) shares in the California Asset Management Program;

(xiv) the Local Agency Investment Fund established pursuant to Section 16429.1 of the Government Code of the State of California, provided, however, that the Fiscal Ag ent will be permitted to make investments and withdrawals in its own name and the Fiscal Agent may restrict investments in the such fund if necessary to keep moneys available for the purposes of this Fiscal Agent Agreement; or

(xv) any other lawful investment for City funds.

“Prepayment Account” means the account of the Bond Fund by that name established by Section 4.02(A) hereof.

“Principal Office ” means the corporate trust office of the Fiscal Agent set forth in Section 9.06, or such other or additional offices as may be designated by the Fiscal Agent.

“Project” means the acquisitions and improvements described in the Resolution of Intention.

“Qualified Reserve Fund Credit Instrument” means an irrevocable standby or direct -pay letter of credit or surety bond issued by a commercial bank or insurance company and deposited with the Fiscal Agent pursuant to Section 4.03, provided that all of the following requirements are met: (i) the long-term credit rating of such bank or insurance company is rated in at least the “AA” category (without regard to qualifier) by S&P or Moody’s; (ii) such letter of credit or surety bond has a term of at least twelve (12 ) months; (c) such letter of credit or surety bond has a stated amount at least equal to the portion of the Reserve Requirement with respect to which funds are proposed to be released pursuant to Section 4.03; and (d) the Fiscal Agent is authorized pursuant to the terms of such letter of credit or surety bond to draw thereunder an amount equal to any deficiencies which may exist from time to time in the Bond Fund for the purpose of making payments required pursuant to Section 4.03.

“Rate and Method ” means the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for Improvement Area No. 1, as initially approved and as may be amended.

“Record Date ” means the 15th day of the month next preceding the month of the applicable Interest Payment Date whether or not such day is a Business Day.

“Regulations” means temporary and permanent regulations promulgated under the Code.

“Reserve Fund” means the fund by that name established pursuant to Section 4.03(A) hereof.

“Reserve Requirement” means, with respect to any Series of Bonds (unless otherwise specified in a Supplemental Agreement, including to create a single parity reserve fund for multiple Series of Bonds), the least of (i) 125% of the average Annual Debt Service with respect to the applicable Series of Bonds; (ii) Maximum Annual Debt Service with respect to the applicable Series of Bonds; and (iii) 10% of the original principal amount of the applicable Series of Bonds (or, if the applicable Series of Bonds has more than a de minimis amount of original issue discount or premium, 10% of the issue price of such Series of Bonds); provided, that—

ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 323 of 600 ends

9 (a) if a parity reserve fund for multiple Series of Bonds is established, references to the applicable Series of Bonds shall mean all Bonds covered by such parity reserve fund;

(b) in no event shall the City be obligated to deposit an amount in any reserve fund in excess of the amount permitted by the applicable provisions of the Code to be so deposited from the proceeds of tax -exempt bonds without having to restrict the yield of any investment purchased with any portion of such deposit and, if the amount of any such deposit is so limited, the Reserve Requirement shall be only the amount of such deposit as permitted by the Code; and

(c) the City may meet all or a portion of the Reserve Requirement with respect to any series of Bonds by depositing a Qualified Reserve Fund Credit Instrument in accordance with Section 4.03(A).

(d) the Reserve Requirement shall be set at the time of issuance of each Series of Bonds and shall not increase thereafter but may decrease as a result of prepayment of the Special Tax.

“Resolution” means Resolution No. _____-2022, adopted by the City Council of the City on ______________, 2022, which resolution authorized the issuance of the Bonds.

“Resolution of Formation” means Resolution No. _____-2021, adopted by the City Council of the City on December 6, 2021, establishing the District and designating therein Improvement Area No. 1.

“Securities Depositories” means The Depository Trust Company, and, in accordance with then current guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such other addresses and/or such other securities depositories as the City may designate in an Officer’ s Certificate delivered to the Fiscal Agent.

“Series” means any series of bonds authorized for Improvement Area No. 1 pursuant to this Fiscal Agent Agreement or any Supplemental Agreement.

“Special Tax Fund” means the fund by that name established by Section 3.03(A) hereof.

“Special Tax Revenues” means the proceeds of the Special Taxes annually received by the City, less an amount equal to the Administrative Expense Priority , including all scheduled payments and delinquent payments thereof, interest and penalties thereon and proceeds of the redemption or sale of property sold as a result of foreclosure of the lien of the Special Taxes.

“Special Taxes” means the “Special Tax” as defined in the Rate and Method, levied within Improvement Area No. 1 pursuant to the Act, the Ordinance and this Agreement.

“Supplemental Agreement” means an agreement which is amendatory of or supplemental to this Agreement, but only if and to the extent that such agreement is specifically authorized hereunder.

“Surplus Account” means the account of the Special Tax Fund by that name established by Section 3.03(A) hereof.

ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 324 of 600 ends

10 “2022 Bonds” means the City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 Improvement Area No. 1 Special Tax Bonds Series 2022.

“2022 Capitalized Interest Account” means the fund by that name established pursuant to Section 4.02(A) hereof.

“2022 Costs of Issuance Fund ” means the fund by that name established pursuant to Section 3.05(A) hereof.

“2022 Reserve Account” means the account by that name established within the Reserve Fund pursuant to Section 4.03(A) hereof.

ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 325 of 600 ends

11 ARTICLE II

THE BONDS

Section 2.01. Principal Amount; Designation . 2022 Bonds in the aggregate principal amount of $___________ are hereby authorized to be issued by the City for Improvement Area No. 1 under and subject to the terms of the Resolution and this Agreement, the Act and other applicable laws of the State of California. The 2022 Bonds shall be designated the “City of Rancho Cordova The Ranch Community Facilities District No. 2021-1 Improvement Area No. 1 Special Tax Bonds Series 2022.”

Section 2.02. Terms of 2022 Bonds.

(A) Form; Denominations. The 2022 Bonds shall be issued as fully registered Bonds without coupons in the denomination of $5,000 o r any integral multiple of $5,000 in excess thereof. The 2022 Bonds shall be lettered and numbered in a customary manner as determined by the Fiscal Agent.

(B) Date of 2022 Bonds. The 2022 Bonds shall be dated the Closing Date for the 2022 Bonds.

(C) CUSIP Identification Numbers. “CUSIP” identification numbers shall be imprinted on the 2022 Bonds, but such numbers shall not constitute a part of the contract evidenced by the 2022 Bonds and any error or omission with respect thereto shall not constitute cause for refusal of any purchaser to accept delivery of and pay for the 2022 Bonds. In addition, failure on the part of the City or the Fiscal Agent to use such CUSIP numbers in any notice to Owners shall not constitute an event of default or any violation of the City ’s contract with such Owners and shall not impair the effectiveness of any such notice.

(D) Maturities. The 2022 Bonds shall be issued as serial bonds and term bonds and shall mature and become payable as follows:

Maturity Principal Interest CUSIP
(September 1) Amount Rate (______)

ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 326 of 600 ends

12 (E) Interest. The 2022 Bonds shall bear interest at the rates set forth above payable on the Interest Payment Dates in each year. Interest shall be calculated on the basis of a 360-day year composed of twelve 30-day months. Each 2022 Bond shall bear interest from the Interest Payment Date next preceding the date of authentication thereof unless (i) it is authenticated on an Interest Payment Date, in which event it shall bear interest from such date of authentication, or (ii) it is authenticated prior to an Interest Payment Date and after the close of business on the Record Date preceding such Interest Payment Date, in which event it shall bear interest from such Interest Payment Date, or (iii) it is authenticated prior to the Record Date preceding the first Interest Payment Date, in which event it shall bear interest from the Closing Date; provided, however, that if at the time of authentication of a 2022 Bond, interest is in default thereon, such 2022 Bond shall bear interest from the Interest Payment Date to which interest has previously been paid or made available for payment thereon.

(F) Method of Payment . Interest on the 2022 Bonds (including the final interest payment upon maturity or earlier redemption) is payable by check of the Fiscal Agent mailed on the Interest Payment Dates by first class mail to the registered Owner thereof at such registered Owner’s address as it appears on the registration books maintained by the Fiscal Agent at the close of business on the Record Date preceding the Interest Payment Date, or by wi re transfer made on such Interest Payment Date upon written instructions received by the Fiscal Agent on or before the Record Date preceding the Interest Payment Date of any Owner of $1,000,000 or more in aggregate principal amount of 2022 Bonds; provided that so long as any 2022 Bonds are in book-entry form, payments with respect to such 2022 Bonds shall be made by wire transfer or such other method acceptable to the Fiscal Agent to the Depository. The principal of the 2022 Bonds and any premium on the 2022 Bonds are payable in lawful money of the United States of America upon surrender of the 2022 Bonds at the Principal Office of the Fiscal Agent. All 2022 Bonds paid by the Fiscal Agent pursuant to this Section shall be cancelled by the Fiscal Agent.

The Fiscal Agent shall destroy the cancelled 2022 Bonds and issue a certificate of destruction thereof to the City.

Section 2.03. Redemption.

(A) Redemption Dates.

(i) Optional Redemption. The 2022 Bonds are subject to optional redemption from any source of available funds (other than prepayments of the Special Tax by property owners), in whole or in part among maturities as specified by the City and by lot within a maturity, on any date on and after September 1, 20___ at the following respective redemption prices (expressed as percentages of the principal amount of the 2022 Bonds to be redeemed), plus accrued interest thereon to the date of redemption:

Redemption Dates Redemption Price
September 1, 20___ through August 31, 20___ 103%
September 1, 20___ through August 31, 20___ 102
September 1, 20___ through August 31, 20___ 101
September 1, 20___ and any date thereafter 100

(ii) Mandatory Redemption From Prepayments. The 2022 Bonds shall be subject to mandatory redemption from prepayments of the Special Tax by property owners, in whole or in part among maturities as shall be specified by the City and by lot within a maturity, on any Interest Payment Date at the following respe ctive redemption prices (expressed as percentages of the ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 327 of 600 ends

13 principal amount of the 2022 Bonds to be redeemed), plus accrued interest thereon to the date of redemption:

Redemption Dates Redemption
Price
Interest Payment Dates through and including March 1, 20___ 103% September 1, 20___ and March 1, 20___ 102
September 1, 20___ and March 1, 20___ 101
September 1, 20___ and Interest Payment Dates thereafter 100

The proceeds of any such prepayment shall be deposited in the Prepayment Account of the Bond Fund and applied by the Fiscal Agent to pay the redemption price of the 2022 Bonds.

(iii) Mandatory Sinking Fund Redemption . The Term Bonds maturing September 1, 20___, September 1, 20___ and September 1, 20___ (the “Term Bonds ”) are subject to mandatory sinking payment redemption in part on September 1, 20___, September 1, 20___ and September 1, 20 ___, and on each September 1 thereafter to maturity, by lot, at a redemption price equal to 1 00% of the principal amount thereof to be redeemed, without premium, in the aggregate respective principal amounts as set forth in the following tables:

September 1, 20___ Term Bonds

Mandatory
Redemption Date
(September 1)

Sinking Fund
Payment

September 1, 20___ Term Bonds

Mandatory
Redemption Date
(September 1)

Sinking Fund
Payment

ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 328 of 600 ends

14 September 1, 20___ Term Bonds

Mandatory
Redemption Date
(September 1)

Sinking Fund
Payment

The amounts in the foregoing tables shall be reduced pro rata at the direction of the City in an Officer’s Certificate, in order to maintain substantially uniform debt service, as a result of any prior partial redemption of the 2022 Bonds pursuant to Section 2.03(A)(i) or (ii) above.

In lieu of redemption under this Section 2.03, moneys in the Bond Fund may be used and withdrawn by the Fiscal Agent for purchase of Outstanding 2022 Bonds, upon the filing with the Fiscal Agent of an Officer’s Certificate requesting such purchase, at public or private sale as and when, and at such prices (including brokerage and other charges) as such Officer’ s Certificate may provide, but in no event may 2022 Bonds be purchased at a price in excess of the principal amount thereof, plus interest accrued to the date of purchase.

(B) Notice to Fiscal Agent. The City shall give the Fiscal Agent an Officer’s Certificate containing notice of its intention to redeem 2022 Bonds pursuant to subsections (A)(i) and (A)(ii) not less than 60 days prior to the applicable redemption date.

(C) Redemption Procedure by Fiscal Agent. The Fiscal Agent shall cause notice of any redemption to be mailed by first class mail, postage prepaid, at least 20 days but not more than 60 days prior to the date fixed for redemption, to the Securities Depositories and to the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board and to the Securities Depositories, and to the respective registered Owners of any Bonds designated for redemption, at their addresses appearing on the Bond registration books in the Principal Office of the Fiscal Agent; but such mailing shall not be a condition precedent to such redemption and failure to mail or to receive an y such notice, or any defect therein, shall not affect the validity of the proceedings for the redemption of such Bonds.

Such notice shall state the redemption date and the redemption price and, if less than all of the then Outstanding Bonds are to be cal led for redemption, shall designate the CUSIP numbers and Bond numbers of the Bonds to be redeemed by giving the individual CUSIP number and Bond number of each Bond to be redeemed or shall state that all Bonds between two stated Bond numbers, both inclusive, are to be redeemed or that all of the Bonds of one or more maturities have been called for redemption, shall state as to any Bond called in part the principal amount thereof to be redeemed, and shall require that such Bonds be then surrendered at the Principal Office of the Fiscal Agent for redemption at the said redemption price, and shall state that further interest on such Bonds will not accrue from and after the redemption date.

The City has the right to rescind any notice of the redemp tion of Bonds under Section

2.03(A)(i) by written notice to the Fiscal Agent on or prior to two Business Days prior the date fixed for redemption. Any notice of redemption shall be cancelled and annulled if for any reason funds will not be or are not available on the date fixed for redemption for the payment in full of the Bonds then called for redemption, and such cancel lation shall not constitute an event of ITEM 12.1.

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 329 of 600 ends

Rancho Cordova City CouncilSeptember 6, 2022

Rancho Cordova City Council
September 6, 2022