Rancho Cordova City Council
June 5, 2023

County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
City of Rancho Cordova Contract No. 2023-68
Exhibit A

H. Managing Capacity Grant Applications and Awards: The EFR Consultant shall be responsible for managing the Capacity Grant application and award process in conjunction with the EFRWG.

6. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES
A. Contracting with EFR Consultant: COUNTY shall execute and administer the contract with the EFR Consultant on behalf of the COUNTY and CITIES. Tasks associated with contract
administration include, but are not limited to, contract procurement, invoice processing and payment, and preparation of contract amendments.

B. Managing of Program Related Funds: COUNTY shall create and maintain the Program Fund, fund centers, and cost centers necessary to support the Program’s revenues, expenditures, and fund balance. Tasks associated with the management of Program Fund include, but are not limited to, initial fund set-up, collection of funds, distribution of funds, and annual reporting of account activities to the EFRWG.

C. Tracking and Reimbursement of COUNTY Costs: COUNTY shall track its costs associated with its Program responsibilities listed above and shall be reimbursed for such Program expenses as specified in Exhibit B.

7. CAPACITY GRANT APPLICATION AND AWARD PROCESS
The EFRWG shall develop and administer a Capacity Grant application and award process to be managed by the EFR Consultant. Capacity Grants may be awarded for both additional Tier 1 and Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity, as well as for costs related to existing Tier 1 and Tier 2 Edible Food Recovery Capacity. Capacity Grant Funding is described in Exhibit B.

ITEM 16.9. ATTACHMENT 5

County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
City of Rancho Cordova Contract No. 2023-68
Exhibit B

EXHIBIT B to Agreement

FUNDING AND COMPENSATION

1. COUNTY AND CITIES FUNDING RESPONSIBILITIES
A. Allocation of Revenue Requirements to Fund the Program Among COUNTY and each CITY: The Annual Program Budget revenue commitment shall be allocated among the COUNTY and each CITY pursuant to Attachment 3 and based on the following allocation methodology:

1. 50% of the agreed upon annual Program revenue
requirement will be allocated to the COUNTY and each CITY based on their respective percentage of overall Countywide population as reported by the 2020 census; and

2. 50% of the agreed upon annual Program revenue
requirement will be allocated to the COUNTY and each CITY based on their respective percentage of the total number of Tier 1 and Tier 2 generators in the County that are located in their individual jurisdiction based on the most recently completed Tier 1 and 2 generator list published by the EFR Consultant on October 1 of each year.

B. Annual Program Budget Revenue: COUNTY and each CITY shall commit revenue to fund the Program according section 1.A above and remit 25% of their revenue commitment of the preliminary Annual Program Budget into the Program Fund by no later than August 1 each year, with the remaining portion pursuant to the approved final Annual Program Budget deposited by no later than November 1 each year.

C. Annual Program Budget Revenue Requirement In Excess of 10% From Prior Fiscal Year: Beginning in Fiscal Year 2025/2026, if an individual jurisdiction’s allocated annual revenue requirement for COUNTY or any CITY exceeds 110% of the prior year allocated annual revenue requirement, then said COUNTY or CITY may elect to withdraw for cause from the Agreement pursuant to section 18.

D. Inability to Fund Allocated Revenue Requirement Amount: If COUNTY or any CITY is unable to fully fund its allocated annual revenue requirement, then said COUNTY or CITY shall withdraw from this Agreement pursuant to section 18,
E. Non-Program Related Jurisdictional Edible Food Recovery Funding: Non-Program related funding, including grant funding, obtained by COUNTY or any CITY specific to Tier 1 or Tier 2 ITEM 16.9. ATTACHMENT 5

County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
City of Rancho Cordova Contract No. 2023-68
Exhibit B

commercial edible food recovery and/or distribution capacity shall not be used by the respective jurisdiction to offset its Annual Program Budget funding requirement. COUNTY and/or any CITY shall still be obligated to fully fund their allocated revenue requirement amount.

F. Grant Funding: Any grant funding obtained by COUNTY or any CITY with the assistance of the EFR Consultant shall be directed to the Program Fund and shall not be used by the respective jurisdiction to offset its Annual Program Budget funding requirement for the next fiscal year. COUNTY and/or any CITY shall still be obligated to fully fund their allocated revenue requirement amount.

2. CAPACITY GRANT FUNDING
A. Capacity Grant Funding: Funding for Capacity Grants shall be provided in the Annual Program Budget, as determined by the EFRWG. Any Annual Program Budget funding earmarked for
Capacity Grants that are not awarded in the fiscal year they were budgeted shall be made available for Capacity Grant funding in future years, unless otherwise directed by the EFRWG.

B. Equitable Distribution of Capacity Grant Monies: COUNTY and CITIES intend to distribute Capacity Grant monies among Food Recovery Organizations, Food Recovery Services and/or other entities that recover and/or distribute food recovered from Tier 1 or Tier 2 Commercial Edible Food Generators in a manner that best supports optimizing commercial edible food recovery and distribution in the County, with consideration for equitably distributing Capacity Grant monies among those entities that apply for Capacity Grants.

3. REIMBURSEMENT OF COUNTY PROGRAM COSTS
COUNTY shall be reimbursed for its Program costs associated with the tasks outlined in Exhibit A, section 6.

COUNTY shall submit an expenditure itemization summary to the EFRWG on a quarterly basis. Billing shall reflect COUNTY administrative Program costs and/or pass-through EFR Consultant contract costs.

All billing shall be based on current contract and/or labor rate schedules that will be updated annually. All invoices submitted by the EFR Consultant to COUNTY for payment will be submitted as pass through costs to the Program Fun
ITEM 16.9. ATTACHMENT 5

County of Sacramento Contract No. _____
City of Rancho Cordova Contract No. 2023-68
Exhibit B

ITEM 16.9. ATTACHMENT 5

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 16.10.

DATE: June 5, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Kristine Courdy, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LIST OF
PROJECTS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 FUNDING BY SB 1:

THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would allow the City to receive Senate Bill 1 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account funding for the Citywide Street Rehabilitation Program.

BACKGROUND
On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), also known as the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017. SB 1 was enacted to address road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety needs on both the state highway and local street and roads systems. The source of revenue is generally State taxes and fees on fuel and vehicle licensing.

Beginning November 1, 2017, the State Controller started collecting the new funds generated from the increased fuel taxes and vehicle registration fees into the newly created Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA). A portion of the RMRA funds will be distributed annually to eligible cities and counties for basic road maintenance, rehabilitation, and critical safety projects on the local streets and roads systems. The City's allocation for Fiscal Year 2023-24 is estimated to be $1,986,494.00.

In order to be considered for funding, agencies must annually provide a proposed list of projects to the California Transportation Commission by July 1, 2023. The project that is proposed for the RMRA funds in Fiscal Year 2023-24 is repairs to Sunrise Boulevard Improvement Project.

The project addresses deferred maintenance, increased safety and beautifying the corridors.

RMRA guidelines require that listed projects shall be adopted by resolution of the City Council and include the infrastructure service life, project description, project location, and proposed schedule.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

There is no fiscal impact of approving the SB 1 Project List, as the funds were anticipated in the adopted budget. The adoption of the SB 1 Project List would ensure the City is eligible for the SB 1 RMRA funding.

As a stipulation for accepting the RMRA funding, SB 1 requires that the City maintain a level of effort annually from the general fund equivalent to the average expenditures from its general fund in 2009-10, 2010-11, and 2011-12 fiscal years that were spent on roads. The City's annual maintenance of effort from the general fund has been established as $776,604.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

ITEM 16.10. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 3

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24 FUNDED BY SB 1: THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB 1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statutes of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; and
WHEREAS, SB 1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of the City of Rancho Cordova are aware of the projects proposed for funding in the community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB 1, which must include a description and location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project’s completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova will receive an estimated $1,986,494.00 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2023-24 from SB 1; and
WHEREAS, this is the sixth year in which the City of Rancho Cordova is receiving SB 1 funding which will enable the City of Rancho Cordova to continue providing essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairs and replacement of aging bridges, and an increase of access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB 1; and
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova has undergone a robust public process to ensure public input into the community’s transportation priorities; and WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB 1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community's priorities for transportation investment; and
WHEREAS, the funding from SB 1 will help the City of Rancho Cordova maintain and rehabilitate main arterial and local roads throughout the City of Rancho Cordova this year; and WHEREAS, the 2018 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City of Rancho Cordova streets and roads are in a “fair” condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will bring our streets and roads into a “good” condition; and WHEREAS, the SB 1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets

ITEM 16.10. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 2 of 3
infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA:

1. That the foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. That the following list of newly proposed projects will be funded in part by Fiscal Year 2023-24 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Project Title: Sunrise Boulevard Rehabilitation Improvement Project Project Description: Street rehabilitation and improvement of Sunrise Boulevard from White Rock Road to Jackson Highway. This Project also includes sidewalk upgrades/repairs, median and landscaping improvements and storm drain upgrades as necessary.

Project Location: Sunrise Boulevard White Rock Road to Jackson Highway Estimated Project Schedule:
• Design/Environmental: Summer 2023/Winter 2024
• Construction: Winter 2024/Summer 2025
Estimated Project Useful Life: 15-20 Years

3. That the following previously proposed and adopted projects may also utilize Fiscal Year 2023-24 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues in their delivery. With the relisting of these projects in the adopted fiscal year resolution, the City of Rancho Cordova is reaffirming to the public and the State our intent to fund these projects with Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Project Title: Citywide Street Rehabilitation Project
Project Description: Streets identified for FY2022-23 funds are located within the Countryside Neighborhood that lie within the boundaries of Mather Field Road, Rockingham Drive, Old Placerville Road, Routier Road and Mills Station Road. This Project also includes sidewalk upgrades/repairs and storm drain upgrades as necessary.

Estimated Project Schedule:
• Design/Environmental: Summer 2022/Winter 2023
• Construction: Winter 2024/Summer 2025
Estimated Project Useful Life: 15-20 Years
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 5th day of June 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ITEM 16.10. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 3 of 3
ATTEST:

Linda Budge, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 16.11.

DATE: June 5, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Micah Runner, City Manager
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE

THE FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT FOR LAW

ENFORCEMENT SERVICES BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF

SACRAMENTO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would allow the County of Sacramento to continue operating as the Rancho Cordova Police Department through June 30, 2026.

BACKGROUND
The City of Rancho Cordova was incorporated on July 1, 2003. Pursuant to Government Code section 57384, the County of Sacramento continued to provide law enforcement services to the City for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2003/04. On July 1, 2004, the City and County entered into an agreement for continued law enforcement services through June 30, 2010. In 2010, both parties agreed to continue the partnership and enter into a new Agreement for Law Enforcement Services. The current agreement has been amended three (3) times with an effective term ending on June 30, 2023.

Based upon the January Council work session, the focus areas, in addition to the primary scope of service for Rancho Cordova Police Department, for the City and the Rancho Cordova Police Department over the next term of the contract include the following areas:
• Training - ensuring Rancho Cordova Police Department staff receive and have access to the highest level of training and access to technology. • Turnover - monitoring the rate of turnover of Rancho Cordova Police Department officers and reviewing alternatives to reduce the turnover rate. • Reporting - ensuring the accurate and timely availability of reports from Rancho Cordova Police Department to staff, Council and the community. • Communications - continue to collaborate and build the relationship between the Rancho Cordova Police Department, Sheriff Department and the City as it relates to communications.

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

The primary scope of services that are included in the contract include the following:
• Patrol Unit
• Problem Oriented Policing (POP) Unit
• Traffic Enforcement Unit
• Investigative Services
• Crime Analysis Unit
• Crisis Intervention Unit
• Youth Services (includes School Resource Officers and Rancho Cordova Police Activities League)
• Crime Suppression Unit
• Folsom-Olson-Zinfandel POP Officer
• Communication Services (Dispatch)
The contract also includes overarching goals for police services being provided by the Sheriff's Department. Each of the six (6) goals includes a list of performance measures that the Sheriff's Department are to track and report back on to the City. The list is included in Attachment A of Contract No. 91-2010.

1. Ensuring Order and Civility in Public Places

2. Reduction of Crime and Victimization

3. Holding Offenders Accountable

4. Efficient and Effective Use of the (Operational and Financial)

5. Using Authority and Force Fairly and Effectively

6. Quality Service/Customer Satisfaction
The proposed Fourth Amendment to the Agreement will extend the term of the contract an additional three (3) years to June 30, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
The cost of the service plan has been incorporated into the adopted Fiscal Year 2023-25 operating budget and will be incorporated into the operating budgets moving forward. For Fiscal Year 2023-24, the proposed budget is $29,791,117 funded from the General Fund and $1,988,468 from the Community Enhancement Fund for the Crime Suppression Unit, Youth Services Officer and the Folsom Olson Zinfandel (FOZ) Officer. For Fiscal Year 2024-25, the proposed budget is $30,861,910 funded from the General Fund and $2,066,477 from the Community Enhancement Fund for the Crime Suppression Unit, Youth Services Officer and the Folsom Olson Zinfandel (FOZ) Officer. All the budgets are incorporated into the budget for FY 2023-2025.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Original Contract: Sacramento County - Law Enforcement Services - No. 91-2010

3. Contract: Sacramento County - Law Enforcement Services - No. 91-2010-4

ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,

AUTHORIZING CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE

AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF

SACRAMENTO AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova incorporated on July 1, 2003; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 57384, the County continued to provide law enforcement services to the City for the remainder of Fiscal Year 2003/04; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2004, the City and County ("Parties") entered into an agreement for continued law enforcement services for three (3) years; and WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a subsequent three (3) year agreement on July 1, 2007, which was automatically renewed for an additional three (3) years. The City and County agreed to terminate the 2007 agreement and enter into a new agreement; and WHEREAS, effective July 1, 2010, the Parties entered into the new Agreement for Law Enforcement Services ("Agreement"). The Agreement had a three (3) year term ending on June 30, 2012, with a one (1) year extension option, which was exercised by the City; and WHEREAS, effective July 1, 2013, the Parties entered into the First Amendment to the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services that had a three (3) year term scheduled to end on June 30, 2016; and
WHEREAS, effective July 1, 2016, the Parties entered into a Second Amendment to the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services that had a five (5) year term scheduled to end on June 30, 2021, and implemented a service delivery model with a major emphasis on community-oriented policing; and
WHERAS, effective June 21, 2021, the Parties entered into a Third Amendment to the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services that had a two (2) year term scheduled to end on June 20, 2023; and
WHEREAS, the Parties wish to enter into the Fourth Amendment to the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services, to extend the term for an additional three (3) years with a new termination date of June 30, 2026.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does authorize the City Manager to execute the Fourth Amendment to the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova in a form approved by the City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on 5th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 2 of 2
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Linda Budge, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

AGREEMENT FOR

LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES

BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

AND THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 1 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

Contract No. 91-2010

TABLE OF CONTENTS
RECITALS 4

1. Incorporation of Recitals 5

2. Scope of Services 5

3. Term 6

4. Service Plan 6

5. Selection and Assignment of Police Commander 8

6. Selection and Assignment of Personnel 9

7. Supplemental Enforcement Services by City. 9

8. Supervision and Labor Agreements 9

9. Provision of Labor, Equipment and Supplies 10

10. Employment Status of Personnel 11

11. Labor Relations 12

12. Temporary Reassignment During Labor Action of Personnel Performing Services Under this Agreement 12

13. Rules, Regulations, Policies and Procedures 13

14. Scheduling of Shifts 13

15. Reporting Requirements 13

16. Training 14

17. City Powers and Enforcement of City Ordinances 15

18. Mutual Aid 15

19. Compensation for Services 15

20. Invoices and Payment 16

21. Penal Code Section 13823.95 Costs and Booking Costs 18

22. Fines, Forfeitures and Miscellaneous Reimbursements 19

23. Asset Seizures and Forfeitures 19

24. Complaints 20

25. Enhanced Services or Specialized Equipment 20
26, Termination 21

27. Administration 22
Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 2 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

28. Audit 22

29. Indemnification 22

30. Insurance 23

31. Assignment 23

32. Amendments 23

33. Integration 24

34. Construction and Interpretation 24

35. Waiver 24

36. Severability 24

37. Successors and Assigns 24

38. Notices 24

39. Dispute Resolution 25
Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 3 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA

AGREEMENT FOR

LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES

BETWEEN THE

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO

AND THE

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
This Agreement (Agreement") is made and entered into this day of July, 2010, by and between the County of Sacramento, a political subdivision of the State of California ("County"), and the City of Rancho Cordova, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California ("City"), collectively referred to as "the Parities."

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova incorporated on July 1, 2003; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code Section 57384, the County continued to provide law enforcement services to the City for the remainder of fiscal year 2003/2004; and WHEREAS, City and County entered into an agreement on July 1, 2004, for three subsequent years; and
WHEREAS, City and County entered into a subsequent three year agreement on July 1, 2007, which was automatically renewed for an additional three years; and WHEREAS, City and County have agreed to terminate the existing agreement for services that would have expired June 30, 2013 with the execution of this new agreement; and WHEREAS, the City desires to have the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department ("Sheriff' or "County Sheriff') continue to provide law enforcement services within the City's municipal boundaries; and
WHEREAS, the County, through the County Sheriff, is capable of rendering such law enforcement services under the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City and County are authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to Article 1 (commencing with Section 51300) of Chapter 1 of Part 2 of Division 1 of Title 5 of the Government Code; and
WHEREAS, this Agreement establishes the service level standards for the County Sheriff's performance of law enforcement services within the City's municipal boundaries; and WHEREAS, the County Sheriff will continue to operate a shared command municipal police force on behalf of the City, utilizing personnel from the Sheriff's Department; and Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 4 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

WHEREAS, as part of this Agreement, the City and County agree that the City will have significant and meaningful input into the selection and continued assignment of personnel from the Sheriff's Department performing services under this Agreement.

AGREEMENT.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, conditions, and covenants hereinafter set forth, the City and the County hereby agree as follows:

1. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated by reference.

2. SCOPE OF SERVICES.

A. Duties and Functions. The County agrees to have the County Sheriff's Department provide municipal law enforcement services within the corporate limits of the City, to the extent and in the manner set forth under this Agreement. The services shall encompass duties and functions of the type falling under the jurisdiction of, and customarily rendered by, a city police department under applicable State statutes. Such services shall include: (1) the enforcement of State statutes and City codes and ordinances; (2) patrol and traffic enforcement; (3) investigative services; and (4) such other special services customarily performed by police departments to the extent specifically set forth in this Agreement.

B. County as Independent Contractor. County enters into this Agreement as, and shall at all times remain as to the City, an independent contractor. The County is not an employee of the City. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to be inconsistent with this relationship or status. County shall at all times while performing services under this Agreement conduct itself as an independent contractor. The County shall have no power or authority to bind the City, except as set forth under this Agreement. County shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.

C. County Employees, Agents, Contractors or Subcontractors. All employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors hired or retained by the County to perform services under this Agreement are, and at all times shall be, employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors of the County and not of the City. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of County shall at all time be under County's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of County or any of County's officers, employees, or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. County shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees, or agents are in any manner officers or employees of the City, and shall not represent that they are agents of the City of Rancho Cordova except in the limited capacity to perform services under this Agreement.

D. Compensation, Benefits and Claims related to County Employees. The City shall not be responsible, obligated, or liable in any way to pay any salary, wage, compensation, tax, withholding, benefit, injury, illness claims or other claims made against the County and/or the City by any County employee, agent, contractor or subcontractor, or any other person arising from Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 5 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

performance of this Agreement. The County shall be solely responsible, obligated, and liable for any and/or all salary, wage, compensation, tax, withholding, benefit, injury, illness or other similar employment related claims made against County and/or the City by any such employees, agents, contractors or subcontractors, or other person arising from performance of this Agreement. The County shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City against such claims.

E. Performance of Services under this Agreement as Rancho Cordova Police Department. Any performance under this Agreement shall be by only the County, its employees, agents, contractors, subcontractors or others performing directly at the County's direction.

Notwithstanding the foregoing limitation, the City expects the Sheriff to publicly identify personnel assigned to perform services under this Agreement as members of the Rancho Cordova Police Department. Such identification is expected to take the form of patrol cars, uniforms, business cards, stationary, forms and similar items. The Sheriff is also expected to make statements to the media that will convey the message that law enforcement services are being provided by the City of Rancho Cordova Police Department, under an Agreement with the County of Sacramento. The City reserves the right to provide media services to the public on behalf of the Rancho Cordova Police Department. The City owns all images and domain names of "Rancho Cordova Police Department" for the purposes of marketing and image control.

3. TERM.

A. Effective Date and Term, This Agreement shall be effective July 1, 2010, and shall continue in force until June 30, 2012, unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 26 below.

This Agreement shall renew for an additional one (1) year term, through written City notice. The City's obligation to compensate the County for services rendered under this Agreement as set forth in Sections 19 and 20 hereof, the parties indemnification obligations set forth in Section 29 hereof and the City's obligations for funding and repaying the County's self-insurance program as set forth in Section 30 hereof shall survive the termination and/or expiration of this Agreement.

B. Rescission of July 1, 2007 Agreement. The City and County have agreed to terminate the existing agreement for the contract with an effective date of July 1, 2007.

4. SERVICE PLAN.

A. Preparation and Submission of Service Plan. In support of the City's preparation of its annual budget, and as a means of establishing appropriate levels of service under this Agreement, the Sheriff shall prepare and submit by April 1st of each year during the term of this Agreement, a proposed Service Plan for the next fiscal year. The estimated cost of performing the services described in the proposed Service Plan will be included in such plan. The proposed Service Plan will be prepared in consultation with the City Manager, and/or the City Manager's designee (hereinafter "City Manager").

B. Contents of Service Plan. The Service Plan includes two components: (1) The Goals & Performance Measures [see Attachment A], and (2) the Staffing & Budget Plan (separately adopted each fiscal year).

Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 6 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

C. Goals & Performance Measures. The Goals & Performance Measures for this Agreement are included as Attachment A. The Sheriff's Department will work together with the City to implement appropriate systems and tools to measure and evaluate the performance activities listed in Attachment A by September 30, 2010.
i. Quarterly Reporting. Effective at the end of the first quarter of this Agreement, the outcomes or results for all Performance Measure that can be measured via current systems shall be provided to the City Manager on a quarterly basis. In the event the results of the Performance Measures are not presented to the City Manager within 60 days of the conclusion of each quarter, the City may charge a penalty equal to 10% of the next regularly scheduled monthly payment.
ii. Modification of Goals & Performance Measures. The City Manager and Sheriff by mutual agreement can modify Exhibit A during the term of this Agreement.

D. Staffing & Budget Plan. A Staffing & Budget Plan will be prepared by the Sheriff's Department on an annual basis. The County shall provide law enforcement services for fiscal year 2010-2011 at the levels specified in the Staffing & Budget Plan as approved by the City Manager and the Sheriff or the Board of Supervisors as required by the County. The Staffing & Budget Plan will be developed based on the outcomes desired in the Goals & Performance Measures subject to fiscal constraints.
i. Annual Staffing & Budget Plan. The Sheriff's Department shall annually provide the City an annual Staffing & Budget Plan that will detail the deployment of resources consistent with the specific performance measures and outcomes described in the Goals & Performance Measures. The budget for each Fiscal Year during the term of this Agreement shall be adopted by the City Council (via adoption of the relevant fiscal year operating budget) and approved in writing by the Sheriff and the County Executive. Once the Staffing & Budget Plan is established, the Sheriff agrees to and is responsible for the implementation of the Staffing & Budget Plan in such a manner as to substantially comply with the scope and cost of services set forth therein.
ii. Modification of Staffing & Budget Plan. Consistent with this Section, the Sheriff has the discretion to modify the Staffing & Budget Plan after obtaining the written agreement of the City Manager.

E. Adoption of Service Plan. The parties shall use reasonable efforts to adopt an updated Service Plan, as well as the estimated cost for performance of such plan, by June 15th of each year, commencing July 1, 2010. The updated Service Plan and the compensation for such services shall be incorporated into this Agreement by means of an adopted Service Plan for the new fiscal year, which shall be approved by the City Manager and signed by both the City Manager and the Sheriff, In the event of any delay in the adoption of an annual Service Plan and estimated cost pursuant to this section, the County is authorized to continue providing services pursuant to Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 7 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

the previously adopted Service Plan until such time as a new Service Plan is adopted as set forth above. The City shall continue to pay the County for all costs incurred by County in providing services pursuant to such previously adopted plan as set forth in Sections 19 and 20 below.

F. Adjustment of Staffing Levels. The City Manager shall have flexibility to adjust staffing levels or position classifications and related budget based on the determination of changing and legitimate needs, unless such changes increase the staffing and or budget in which case the change needs to be approved by the Board of Supervisors. The City Manager will not request adjusting staffing up and down based on seasonal effects. Changes to the Service Plan shall occur within 21 days from the date of request from the City Manager. In case Board of Supervisors approval is required, the Sheriff Department will bring the modification to a Board of Supervisors meeting in a timely manner.

5. SELECTION AND ASSIGNMENT OF POLICE COMMANDER.

A. Selection of Police Commander. The Sheriff shall provide to the City a list of at least three persons within the Sheriff's Department whom the Sheriff believes to be appropriate for serving as the City's Police Commander ("Commander'). The City Manager shall, at his/her discretion, select one of the persons identified by the Sheriff or request the Sheriff to supply several additional names for consideration and possible selection. The City Manager shall identify from the original or additional list of names provided by the Sheriff a person to serve as the City's Police Commander. Subject to the ultimate control of the Sheriff under the terms of this Agreement, the Police Commander shall perform the traditional role of a municipal Police Commander at the direction of the City for no less than three (3) years.

B. Reassignment of Police Commander. The Police Commander shall serve at the pleasure of the City Manager. The City Manager shall have the absolute and unqualified right to have the Sheriff reassign the person acting as the Commander upon thirty (30) days written notice.

Subject to Section 5(A) of this Agreement and reasonable notice (preferably of at least forty-five (45) days), the Sheriff shall likewise have the absolute and unqualified right to reassign the Commander to other duties within the Sheriff's Department. Should the Sheriff reassign the Commander, the Sheriff shall provide alternative names to the City Manager for review and selection as replacement Commander, consistent with the provisions of Section 5(A) of this Agreement.

C. Assignment of Management Personnel. The Police Commander shall select his/her management personnel to work with the Commander for the City. For purposes of this provision, management personnel shall be defined as personnel within the Sheriff's Department with a civil service classification of lieutenant or higher. These management personnel shall be assigned to the City and serve, similar to the Commander, at the pleasure of the City Manager.

The City Manager shall have the absolute and unqualified right to have the Sheriff reassign the persons serving as management personnel for the City upon thirty (30) days written notice. Subject to reasonable notice (preferably at least thirty (30) days), the Sheriff shall have the absolute and unqualified right to reassign these management personnel to other duties within the Sheriff's Department.

Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 8 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

6. SELECTION AND ASSIGNMENT OF PERSONNEL.

A. Selection of Personnel. The Commander shall work collaboratively with the City Manager in developing criteria for the selection of personnel from the Sheriff's Department to be assigned to perform law enforcement services for the City pursuant to this Agreement. The City shall have the unqualified right to select from the top ten (10) personnel that are interested in serving in the position being recruited for with the additional flexibility that the City can hire personnel beyond the top ten list for personnel with identified, specialized skills and/or training related to the position. If the City is recruiting for more than one of the same position at one time, the City will receive the right to select from five additional interested personnel beyond the first position for each additional position to be filled (i.e. if the City is recruiting for two officer positions the qualified, interested list shall consist of the top fifteen personnel). The City Manager has the right to designate any City staff to interview personnel at any rank or class. The ultimate authority with respect to the assignment of such personnel shall rest with the Sheriff.

B. Minimum Year Requirement.It is understood and agreed that line level personnel assigned to the City will normally be so assigned for a minimum period of three (3) years. Mid level and supervisory personnel shall serve at least two (2) years. Notwithstanding this normal commitment, such personnel may be assigned to other duties within the Sheriff's Department for purposes of promotional opportunities or career advancement. The Sheriff shall provide the Commander and the City Manager reasonable notice (when possible of at least thirty (30) days unless such notice is waived by the City Manager) of any person's reassignment from the City.

C. Reassignment of Personnel.The City Manager shall have the right to request the Commander to reassign any personnel assigned to the City, pursuant to this Agreement, upon notice to the employee by the Commander, or his/her designee, of the reason for the transfer.

Such reassignment may be to another position within the services provided under this Agreement ("City Contract Service") or may be to County service and shall take place within thirty (30) days.

D. Commander and Management Personnel. The provisions of Section 6 (a) - 6(c) shall not apply to the Commander or management personnel as defined in Section 5 hereof.

E. No Reassignment due to Layoffs. All personnel, including management, shall be retained within the City Contract Service and not subject to reassignment due to seniority in the event of a Sheriff's Department layoff. This provision shall not apply if the employee is the subject of a layoff.

7. SUPPLEMENTAL ENFORCEMENT SERVICES BY CITY. The City shall have the right to augment non-sworn law enforcement services as it deems necessary outside the scope of this Agreement.

8. SUPERVISION AND LABOR AGREEMENTS.

A. Labor and Employment.Subject to the provisions of Section 5 and 6 of this Agreement, the Sheriff shall have the responsibility for supervision of law enforcement services, Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 9 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

hiring of personnel, establishing employee standards of performance for individual personnel, assignment of personnel, determining and effecting discipline, determining required training, maintaining personnel files, and other matters relating to the performance of employee services and control of personnel. In the event of a dispute between the Parties as to the manner of performance by personnel of required services, the City shall be consulted and a mutual determination thereof shall be made by the Sheriff and the City Manager. In recognition of the Sheriffs professional expertise in the area of law enforcement, it is agreed that, in any unresolved dispute related to personnel, the Sheriff shall have the final and conclusive determination as between the Parties hereto subject to the provisions of Sections 5 and 6 under this Agreement.

B. Bargaining Agreements. The City acknowledges that the County is legally obligated to comply with bargaining agreements covering County employees performing services pursuant to this Agreement and, as a result, agrees that the County's performance under this Agreement shall be subject to any such bargaining agreements.

C. Service During Labor Actions. The County shall be obligated to provide service comparable to that in the unincorporated area and other cities the County contracts with to provide law enforcement services regardless of any event of a strike, work slowdown, "blue flu" or any other type of job action (formal or informal) by County employees assigned to perform services under this Agreement. Any Labor Action does not excuse the County from providing such a comparable level of service during the duration of the Labor Action. In the event of any Labor Action the County will have to use replacement workers, management personnel or make other arrangements to furnish such comparable level of services for the duration of the Labor Action,

9. PROVISION OF LABOR, EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES.

A. County Resources and Equipment. For the purpose of performing the services required by this Agreement, the County shall furnish all necessary labor, supervision, equipment, communications facilities, and supplies necessary to maintain the level of service set forth in the adopted Service Plan.

B. Annual Inventory of City Owned Equipment. The County shall conduct an Annual Inventory of all City owned equipment and present an Inventory List separately identifying federally purchased items. The annual inventory list will be provided to the City Finance Department by July 15th of each year reporting to assets owned as of June 30th. All purchases of City owned equipment shall follow City purchasing requirements. The City Finance Director shall be authorized signer for police grants at all times. If city owned property is sold, proceeds shall be reported and remitted to the City.

C. City Provided Supplies. The City shall be responsible for supplying any special supplies, stationery, notices, forms or similar items that it requires to be issued with the City logo.

All such items shall be approved by the Police Commander and provided at the City's sole cost and expense.

Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 10 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

D. Use of Existing County Resources. In order to provide the law enforcement services set forth in this Agreement, the County may use existing County resources including, but not limited to, County facilities, equipment, general supplies, and non-law enforcement support personnel and, in addition, may acquire new resources. An appropriate charge for the use of such County resources is included in the County's charges set forth in the adopted Service Plan.

E. Acquisition of New Equipment. To the extent that the County acquires new equipment and supplies for its use in providing services under this Agreement, the City will pay for the cost of such acquisition through the above-referenced charges. Upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, the County shall be entitled to retain any equipment or supplies acquired by it to provide law enforcement services to the City pursuant to this Agreement. In return for the County's right to retain such equipment and supplies for its own use, the City shall be entitled to a credit for any fair market value of such property and supplies as of the date of termination or expiration of the Agreement. This credit shall be accounted for in the final reconciliation of costs and payments.

F. City's Right to Augment County Resources. The City shall have the option of acquiring equipment and supplies and furnishing them to augment the resources used by the County for the County's use in providing services pursuant to this Agreement, either through direct procurement or grants awarded to the Rancho Cordova Police Department. Upon expiration or termination of this Agreement, the City shall be entitled to retain any equipment or supplies acquired by the City.

G. Relocation of Operations. The County shall not relocate any of its operations to perform services under this Agreement without the prior express written agreement of the City.

For purposes of this Agreement, "operations" shall mean "the principal place of operation within the City, e.g. the Police Station."
H. Prior Agreement Before Obtaining Equipment or Services. The County shall not obtain any equipment or services for use within the City or to provide services under this Agreement without the prior express written agreement of the City or as specifically set forth in the Service Plan. The City shall have no obligation to reimburse for any cost of equipment obtained by the County prior to the execution of this Agreement or without the express written agreement of the City having been first obtained unless specifically set forth in the Service Plan.

10. EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF PERSONNEL.

A. Status of County Personnel. Any person employed by the County for the performance of services pursuant to this Agreement shall remain employees of the County on special assignment to the City for purposes of this Agreement, shall at all times be under the direction and control of the County, and shall not be considered employees of the City. All persons employed by County to perform services pursuant to this Agreement shall be entitled solely to the rights and privileges afforded to County employees and shall not be entitled, as a result of providing services hereunder, to any additional rights or privileges that may be afforded to City employees.

Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 11 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

B. City Agent. For the purpose of performing the services provided for in this Agreement, and for the purpose of giving official status to the performance thereof where necessary, every County officer and employee engaged in the performance of any service hereunder shall be deemed to be an agent of the City while performing such services for City provided that such services are within the scope of this Agreement and are purely municipal functions. Notwithstanding the agency relationship established by this subsection, County officers and employees engaged in the performance of any service under this Agreement shall not be City agents for purposes of Section 29, "Indemnification," of this Agreement, and the City shall not otherwise be liable for any act or omission of any County officer or employee unless specifically provided elsewhere in this Agreement. The final authority regarding the reassignment of any individual shall rest with the Sheriff.

C. Salaries, Wages, Compensation and Benefits. City shall not be liable for the direct payment of any salaries, wages, compensation or other benefits to any County employee performing services pursuant to this Agreement, or for compensation or indemnity to any County employee for injury or sickness arising out of his or her employment.

11. LABOR RELATIONS. County shall be responsible for negotiating and administering all labor relations agreements and personnel rules and procedures between County and its employees rendering services pursuant to this Agreement.

12. TEMPORARY REASSIGNMENT DURING LABOR ACTION OF PERSONNEL PERFORMING SERVICES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT.

A. Use of Mutual Aid, In the event of a Labor Action by County employees or other emergency, the City understands and agrees that the County may use the Mutual Aid (as defined in Section 18, of this Agreement) to establish police services within the City at a level comparable to that it was receiving prior to the labor action or emergency, at the discretion of the Sheriff. Prior to utilizing such mutual aid, the Sheriff shall advise the Police Commander of the need for mutual aid and seek the input of the Police Commander with respect to the Sheriff's proposed use of such mutual aid.

B. Temporary Reduction of Service. The City understands that if law enforcement personnel assigned to provide services under this Agreement are utilized outside the City for Mutual Aid under these circumstances the City may be temporarily provided with a reduced level of service. If such reduced level of service results from a Labor Action by County employees, City will be invoiced a reduced amount for services based on the percentage reduction in the level of services provided. The County agrees that it will continue to provide service to the City comparable to that in the unincorporated area and other cities the County contracts with to provide law enforcement services and further agrees that the City, at its option, may secure law enforcement services from another public agency during the duration of any Labor Action or other emergency.

The County and the Sheriff further agree under these circumstances to utilize resources reasonably available from the unincorporated area before utilizing City contracted for resources.

Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 12 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

13. RULES, REGULATIONS, POLICIES AND PROCEDURES.

A. County Procedures. County personnel assigned to provide services under this Agreement are required to abide by all rules, regulations, policies and procedures applicable to employees of the Sheriff's Department ("County Procedures"), a true, accurate and current copy of which is incorporated into this Agreement by this reference and shall be available at all times in the office of the Police Commander and the City Manager's office.

B. City Procedures. County personnel performing services pursuant to this Agreement may be requested by the City Manager to comply with specified city procedures ("City Procedures"). County personnel will comply with such City Procedures, except where such City Procedures may conflict with County Procedures or the requirements of this Agreement, or both.

C. Conflicts between Procedures or Agreement. The provisions of this Agreement shall take precedence over any conflicting City Procedures or County procedures. The Sheriff and the City Manager shall confer should any conflict exist between City Procedures and County Procedures. However, in light of the Sheriff's expertise with respect to law enforcement procedures and their impact upon the operations of the Sheriff's Department, the Sheriff shall retain as related to specific law enforcement issues the final authority to determine how conflicts between City Procedures and County Procedures will be resolved as long as such resolution is consistent with the implementation and cost of the Staffing & Budget Plan.

14. SCHEDULING OF SHIFTS. All patrol and supervisory shifts shall be established by the Commander after consultation with the City Manager. Personnel assigned to each shift may work varying and different times, and may be deployed to other shifts, at the discretion of the Commander. Any long-term shift deployment change will not be implemented by the Commander without first consulting with the City Manager.

15. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS.

A. Quarterly Reports. The County shall provide the City Manager with accurate and timely quarterly reports in a mutually agreeable format. Such reports will include the following items: crime statistics specific to the corporate limits of the City, progress reports and significant activities related to the adopted Goals & Performance Measures, any major incidents occurring during the reporting period and significant staffing issues. In the event the results of the Performance Measures are not presented to the City Manager within sixty (60) days of the conclusion of each quarter, the City may charge a penalty equal to 10% of the next regularly scheduled monthly payment
B. Monthly Reports. In addition, the Commander shall report monthly the number of instances where contract personnel respond to calls for service or an event outside the city boundaries as well as when personnel assigned to areas outside of the City boundaries respond to calls or an event within the boundaries.

Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 13 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

C. Reports Requested by City Manager. As reasonably requested and directed by the City Manager, County shall also provide the City Manager with reports pertaining to issues the City Manager determines are either relevant to the County's performance under the terms of this Agreement and/or the Service Plan, or which are reasonably related to the City's interests concerning law enforcement activities within the City,
D. Annual Reports. The County shall submit an annual report to the City Manager and City Council highlighting services provided during the prior year and setting forth objectives for the upcoming year.

E. Statistics to State and Federal Agencies. The County shall provide statistics for State and Federal agencies that collect the information on a jurisdictional basis.

F. Information for Grants. The County shall also be responsible for preparing on the City's behalf any crime statistics or other reports necessary to comply with Federal or State grants including but not limited to Byrne Grants, U.S. Homeland Security Grants, and COPS program grant requirements which provide funding for any law enforcement services provided under this Agreement. Such reporting shall be sufficient to result in any allocation of funds from any state or federal funding program to the City of Rancho Cordova as its own individual police department including but not limited to Byrne Grant allocations and COPS grant allocations.

16. TRAINING.

A. Required Experience and Training. The County agrees to provide personnel with the required experience and training to perform the services specified in this Agreement.

B. Request to Increase Number of Personnel by City. If, during the term of this Agreement, the City increases the number of personnel allocated hereunder, the City agrees to reimburse the County for "All Costs" incurred in training all levels of personnel hired or promoted by the County as a result of such increased staffing allocation as set forth in the adopted Service Plan. "All Costs" as used in this Section 16 mean direct training costs, such as tuition, training materials and travel expenses associated with training, as well as associated costs such as overtime or other relief while personnel are unable to perform normal services due to training, on a per person basis.

C. Specialized Training. The City shall also be responsible for All Costs associated with any specialized training (e.g. traffic enforcement) required for personnel directly assigned to perform services under this Agreement as set forth in the adopted Service Plan.

D. Reimbursements for Training. Any reimbursement received by the County from the State Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, or from any other non-County funding source, for training provided to personnel assigned to perform services hereunder shall be credited to the City, prorated on a per person basis, unless already factored into the allocated costs set forth in the adopted Service Plan.

Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 14 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

E. Reassignment of Trained Personnel. If any personnel providing service under this Agreement and trained at the expense of the City, as set forth in this Section, is reassigned within 24 months after the training has commenced to perform for the County duty not covered by this Agreement, and was not reassigned at the request of the City, the County shall pay to the City All Costs of training for that employee paid by the City on a pro-rata basis, based on the actual number of months of reassignment during the 24 month period, for training that is required for a municipal policing agency.

17. CITY POWERS AND ENFORCEMENT OF CITY ORDINANCES.

A. Power to Enforce Local Ordinances. In performing services pursuant to this Agreement, the County shall have all the powers of the City and shall receive the full cooperation and assistance of the City, its officers, agents and employees in enforcing rules, regulations, codes and ordinances of the City pursuant to this Agreement.

B. Validity of City Rules, Regulations, Code and Ordinances. The City shall be responsible for the validity of its rules, regulations, codes and ordinances, including any ordinances or codes incorporated by reference in the City's ordinances or code. The City shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify the County, its officers, agents and employees with respect to any claim or action challenging the validity of any City ordinance or with respect to any claim or action that any arrest, citation or other action taken under an invalid City ordinance.

18. MUTUAL AID.

A. Mutual Aid Plan. The State of California Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Plan provides the basis for emergency law enforcement operational deployment procedures within the statewide mutual aid system. The Parties to this Agreement agree to abide by such plan in support of the mutual aid system.

B. Use of Personnel Performing Services Under this Agreement. The City understands and agrees that the Sheriff may use employees performing services under this Agreement to meet the needs under a request for Mutual Aid. The Sheriff shall consult with the Police Commander regarding the City's level of participation in Mutual Aid requests. The County/Sheriff agrees to utilize resources reasonably available from the unincorporated area before utilizing City contracted for resources.

19. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES.

A. Compensation for Law Enforcement Services. The City shall pay the County for providing the law enforcement services set forth in this Agreement. The costs of these services shall be set forth in the Service Plan. All such costs for services provided hereunder will be segregated and recorded within a separate index established within the County's financial system.

For each Fiscal Year, the total budgeted cost for providing law enforcement services pursuant to this Agreement shall not exceed the amount set forth in the Service Plan. The Service Plan shall contain a specific breakdown of the budgeted cost of the various components of these law Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 15 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

enforcement services. A budgeted amount for each of the subsequent fiscal years during the term of this Agreement shall be developed pursuant to the procedure set forth in Section 4 hereof. The amount paid by the City will not exceed the amount stated in the Service Plan, except in the case of an emergency as defined by Section 20(E).

B. Adiustment of Rates and Staffing Levels. In the event that the City and the County are unable to agree on an updated Service Plan, the existing Service Plan shall continue in effect and the County may adjust the rates set forth in such Service Plan up to a maximum cost escalation not to exceed the CPI for the State of California. The County reserves the right to adjust staffing levels to achieve this cost maximum. The City will select the positions to be eliminated in this process. The City shall be provided with written notice of any proposed change in the rates to be charged to the City at least sixty (60) days prior to submittal of the proposed change to the County Board of Supervisors for adoption. During this period, the City shall be afforded the opportunity to review the proposed change with County staff. The City shall thereafter be notified of the adoption of any new rates to be charged to the City and the date upon which such new rates shall become effective. If City fails to appropriate or expend the funds necessary to support the level of service provided under the existing Service Plan, the County shall reduce the level of service consistent with the amount of funds the City makes available to support law enforcement services. No change in funds beyond an annual CPI adjustment or positions may occur until both parties agree to a change.

C. Pursuit of State and Federal Grants. County staff is encouraged to aggressively pursue any and all state and federal grant opportunities, however, any grant accepted for the city must be accepted by the City Finance Director or their designee. The County agrees to administer the grant in conformance with federal and state guidelines and regulations and by the City's internal control requirements.

20. INVOICES AND PAYMENT.

A. Payment of Actual Costs. Except as otherwise specified in this Section, the City shall pay the County for all actual costs incurred by County in providing the law enforcement services set forth in this Agreement. Such costs, which are set forth in the Service Plan, shall include both direct costs and indirect overhead costs allocated to the Sheriff's Department as part of the countywide cost allocation plan as approved by the State Controller's office ("A-87 Plan"). All such costs for services provided hereunder will be segregated and recorded within a separate index established within the County's financial system. A specific breakdown of the budgeted cost of the various components of these law enforcement services is set forth in the Service Plan.

B. Change in Cost Allocation Methodology. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the City may propose that an indirect cost allocation methodology other than A-87 be used in determining the indirect costs payable by the City to the County pursuant to this Agreement. Upon receipt of such request in writing and a written description of the proposed alternative methodology, the County shall be obligated to meet and confer with the City in a goodfaith effort to reach a mutually acceptable agreement with respect to the implementation of an indirect cost allocation methodology other than A-87. Any change in the indirect cost allocation methodology from A-87 to a mutually agreeable alternative shall be implemented in the form of an Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 16 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

amendment to this Agreement that shall be approved by the City Council and the Board of Supervisors.

C. Compensation Schedule.Compensation by the City to the County for the law enforcement services rendered under this Agreement shall be paid on a monthly period basis during the term of this Agreement at the rate of one-twelfth (1/12) of the annual cost of providing such services as set forth in the Service Plan. The City shall make this payment to the County in equal monthly installments beginning on July 1, 2010. The parties understand and agree that the Service Plan for fiscal year 2010-2011 represents estimated costs for the entire fiscal year.

D. Invoices by County. The County shall, no later than the end of the each month, provide a report to the City for each monthly period detailing the County's cost of providing law enforcement services pursuant to this Agreement during the preceding monthly period.

E. Costs in Excess of Agreed Upon Amount. If in any month during the term of this Agreement the County's actual costs exceed the agreed costs as set forth in the Service Plan, the County shall, within thirty (30) days, state in detail the cause(s) of the excess and set forth a plan for completing the Service Plan at the agreed service levels and agreed cost receipt. If the excess is due to an "Emergency Beyond the Reasonable Control of the County and the City" the City and the County shall agree upon a method for the City to pay for those excessive costs incurred by "Emergency Beyond the Control of the County and the City." The phrase "Emergency Beyond the Reasonable Control of the County and the City" shall mean situations where because of flood, earthquake, or other disaster or emergency within the City of Rancho Cordova, the Commander determines that a form of emergency response over and above that contemplated by the Service Plan is required.

F. Timing of Payment; Late Fee, The City agrees to make monthly payments within thirty (30) days of invoice receipt. The County may assess a 10% late fee for payments received sixty (60) days or more delinquent.

G. Government Code Section 51350. In conformance with Government Code Section 51350 the County agrees to not charge the City any portion of the cost allocated in the A87 Plan which are attributable to services made available to all portions of the County. In the course of negotiating the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the City and County have agreed to implement the provisions of Government Code Section 51350 as set forth in subsections (i)-(v) below.

Service Plan. The Service Plan each year sets forth all the direct and indirect costs that the County will charge to the City for law enforcement services during any fiscal year. The City will have a full and complete opportunity to review those costs and the methodology used in calculating them. Each Annual Service Plan shall be subject to negotiation and mutual agreement consistent with the provisions of Section 4 of this Agreement.

City's Review of Methodology in Service Plan. In approving any Service Plan during the term of this Agreement, the City agrees and acknowledges that it has had a full and Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 17 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

complete opportunity to review the costs set forth in any such Service Plan, together with the methodology used in calculating them, and, based upon such review, is satisfied that such costs are appropriately charged by the County and paid by the City. iii. Legal Action Regarding Methodology. The City shall have the right to challenge the legal validity of any direct or any indirect costs under any approved Service Plan (pursuant to Section 4 of this Agreement) charged by the County so long as such challenge is filed within one hundred eighty (180) days after the Service Plan goes into effect. The City may challenge the methodology in, the charges made under, and any payments made pursuant to the continuing Service Plan as not in compliance with law, including but not limited to Government Code section 51350.
iv. Legal Action Regarding Services Not Received. Nothing in this Section shall preclude the City from challenging any charge by the County for law enforcement services on the basis that the service for which the charge was assessed was not actually provided by the County.
v. Limited to Contractual Relationship under Agreement. The provisions of this Section are intended to be limited to the contractual relationship between the City and the County during the term of this Agreement only and shall not be construed so as to bind or otherwise limit the City with respect to any legal rights that it may seek to exercise under Government Code Section 51350 outside the scope of this Agreement or with any other Agreement the City may have with the County.

H. Actual Costs Less than Costs Paid by City. If at the end of the Service Plan quarter the County's costs were less than the costs paid by the City, the County shall adjust the next monthly billing to the City by the difference. If at the end of the Service Plan quarter the County's costs were more than the costs paid by the City, the County shall adjust the next monthly billing by the difference.

21. PENAL CODE SECTION 13823.95 COSTS AND BOOKING COSTS.

A. Penal Code Section 13823.95. Subject to Penal Code Section 13823.95, and any amendment thereto, the City shall be responsible for all costs charged pursuant to Penal Code Section 13823.95 (costs incurred by a qualified health care professional, hospital, or other emergency medical facility for the examination of the victim of a sexual assault under specified conditions) related to offenses alleged to have taken place in the City. These Penal Code Section 13823.95 charges shall be billed separately and represent costs to be paid by the City in excess of its obligations set forth in Sections 18 and 19, above. Such charges shall be paid by the City within thirty (30) days of the City's receipt of an invoice from the County.

B. Booking Costs. The City shall also be responsible for the payment of booking costs as set forth in the Service Plan. The City's responsibility to pay for booking costs shall be subject to, and comply with, State law related to booking costs. However, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as preventing the City from seeking reimbursement for such booking Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 18 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

charges from the person arrested. In recognition of the cost to the City of paying booking charges to the County pursuant to this Agreement, the County and the Sheriff agree to take the following steps with respect to the subject of booking costs:
i. Support Reimbursement Efforts. The County and the Sheriff will support any efforts by the City to seek legislation to provide for State reimbursement of booking charges paid by any city pursuant to a law enforcement services agreement with a county, and ii. Cite and Release Policy. The City of Rancho Cordova's Police Commander has the authority to implement what he deems in his reasonable discretion to be a prudent cite and release policy.

22. FINES, FORFEITURES AND MISCELLANEOUS REIMBURSEMENTS.

A. Fines and Forfeitures of Bail. Fines and forfeitures of bail pursuant to Penal Code Section 1463 et seq. resulting from services performed under this Agreement shall be distributed as though the employees performing services under this Agreement were employees of the City. Any reimbursement received by the County from any non-County funding sources for services charged to the City under this Agreement shall be credited to the City; less any mutually agreed upon County administrative costs directly associated with obtaining or processing the reimbursement.

B. Federal or State Grant Reimbursement. Any funds received by the County on behalf of the City or for the benefit of the City shall be credited to the City. The County will credit City with City's reasonable estimate of fair share of Byrne Grant funding or other Federal or State grant funding applied for and awarded to Sacramento County on behalf of the Rancho Cordova Police Department.

23. ASSET SEIZURES AND FORFEITURES.

A. Assets Seized within the City. When assets are seized in the City by or with the support of personnel performing services under this Agreement, and such assets are subsequently forfeited to the Sheriff, the forfeited assets shall be shared with the City, as set forth below, for purposes of augmenting law enforcement services within the City. The sharing and use of forfeited assets under this Section shall be subject to approval of the forfeiting agency.

B. Use of Assets to Augment Law Enforcement Services within the City. When assets are seized as set forth in Section 23(A), the Sheriff shall apply to the forfeiting agency for the return of assets to the County. In the application, the Sheriff shall specify the percentage of assets returned to the County that are proposed to be used to augment law enforcement services in the City. The City Manager may provide recommendations for the distribution of assets seized within the City. Prior to the submissions of any such applications, the Sheriff shall advise the City Manager of the distribution of assets that will be proposed in the application. The distribution proposed by the Sheriff shall be based upon applicable State and Federal guidelines pertaining to asset forfeitures, the provisions of this Section, and any applicable memorandum of understanding Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 19 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

between the City and the County. Assets that are returned to the County by the forfeiting agency with approval to be used to augment the City's law enforcement services shall be used by the City and the County solely for such purpose. If the forfeiting agency attaches specific conditions to the use of such assets, the City and the County shall comply with such conditions. The Sheriff and the City Manager shall determine the specific use to be made of such assets consistent with any conditions imposed by the forfeiting agency.

C. Seized with the City by Personnel Serving City. In those cases in which assets are seized within the City by personnel assigned to the City pursuant to this Agreement, without the involvement of other law enforcement personnel, and in which the seizure is the result solely of activities self-initiated by such personnel in response to a call for service within the City, the Sheriff shall apply to have those assets that are subject to distribution to the Sheriff, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 11489, to be used to augment the City's law enforcement services.

D. Seized within the City by Personnel Serving both City and County. In those cases where assets are seized within the City by both County personnel assigned to the City pursuant to this Agreement and other law enforcement personnel not so assigned, the Sheriff shall determine the appropriate percentage of the total forfeited assets that shall be proposed to be used to augment the City's law enforcement services. The Sheriff shall determine such percentage based upon the circumstances of the seizure and the pro rata involvement of the various personnel.

24. COMPLAINTS. County agrees to handle and respond to complaints regarding law enforcement service provided under this Agreement in a courteous and timely manner. Complaints shall be processed and appropriate records maintained consistent with applicable law and established Sheriff's Department procedures for addressing citizen complaints. Disclosure of information relative to complaints and any associated internal investigations shall be made only to the extent prescribed by applicable law. The City of Rancho Cordova through its City Manager and/or Commander shall be entitled to information relative to complaints, and any associated internal investigations regarding services performed under this Agreement to the extent permissible by law, as well as action taken and disposition dates.

25. ENHANCED SERVICES OR SPECIALIZED EQUIPMENT.

A. Request by City for Enhanced Law Enforcement Services. At the written request of the City Manager, the Sheriff, at his/her sole discretion, may provide, consistent with the procedures set forth in this Section, law enforcement services within the City in addition to those contemplated in the Service Plan ("Enhanced Law Enforcement Services"). If the Sheriff determines that it is appropriate to provide such Enhanced Law Enforcement Services and there is sufficient staffing available, the type, time and place of such Enhanced Law Enforcement Services shall be agreed upon by the City Manager and the Sheriff.

B. Cost of Enhanced Law Enforcement Services. The Sheriff shall determine the personnel and equipment required to provide such Enhanced Law Enforcement Services and the budgeted cost for such Enhanced Law Enforcement Services. Upon the written concurrence of the City Manager and the County Executive as to this budgeted cost, the Sheriff may proceed to Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 20 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

provide such Enhanced Law Enforcement Services and the City shall pay the cost of such Enhanced Law Enforcement Services as agreed to by the City Manager.

C. Invoice and Payment of Enhanced Law Enforcement Services, The County shall submit a separate invoice or invoices for such Enhanced Law Enforcement Services. Such invoice or invoices shall be due and payable within thirty (30) days of receipt by the City.

D. Special Equipment. If, during the term of this Agreement, items of special equipment ("Special Equipment") are necessary to support Enhanced Law Enforcement Services within the City that fall outside the services set forth in the Service Plan, the City may furnish such Special Equipment or authorize the County to obtain such Special Equipment. In either case, all costs associated with providing and maintaining such Special Equipment shall be borne by the City. Any such Special Equipment shall meet applicable County specifications. Title to any Special Equipment purchased pursuant to this provision shall remain vested with the City. If the City elects not to provide Special Equipment, the County shall be authorized to modify or discontinue the performance of Enhanced Law Enforcement Services for which the Special Equipment is necessary.

26. TERMINATION.

A. Termination Without Cause. Either Party may terminate this Agreement for any reason and without cause by providing fifteen (15) months prior written notice to the other Party.

B. Termination due to Breach. If the County fails to perform a material element of this Agreement, and further fails to correct such breach after being given a written notice specifically describing the breach and a reasonable opportunity to cure, the City shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement without further cause upon not less than ninety (90) days prior written notice to the County.

C. Termination for Lack of Reconciliation Payment. If any undisputed reconciliation payment required to be made by either Party pursuant to Sections 19 and 20 is not received by the Party to whom it is due within the prescribed time, and the defaulting Party fails to cure such breach by making the undisputed reconciliation payment within fifteen (15) business days after receipt of a delinquency notice from the other Party, the Party to whom the undisputed payment is owed shall be entitled to terminate this Agreement without further cause upon not less than ninety (90) days prior written notice to the other Party.

D. Payments During Notice Period. In the event of the termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay the County for all costs of services rendered through and until the effective date of termination.

E. Transition Plan. In the event that a notice of intent to terminate the Agreement is given, the City and Sheriff will negotiate, in good faith, a transition plan which will provide an orderly transition of service to maintain the same level of service and equipment during the remainder of the term.

Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 21 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

F. Hiring of Additional Law Enforcement Officers. If either Party provides notice of its intent to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section, after such notice of termination, the City shall have the right to hire law enforcement officers and to otherwise augment law enforcement services.

G. Police Reports and Files. Upon termination of the Agreement, the County shall give the City any and all Police Reports and other activity reports to the extent permitted by law.

Whenever possible the reports and logs shall be provided in a digital format usable by the City; the City shall pay the County all reasonable expenses to duplicate these records.

H. Surplus Equipment and Supplies. The County shall give the City the right of first refusal to acquire surplus equipment and supplies used in this contract to include but limited to:
office furnishings, vehicles and equipment installed in such vehicles and personal equipment for officers including, but not limited to, guns, vests, uniforms, communications gear, utility belts and similar safety equipment.

27. ADMINISTRATION. The City Manager shall administer this Agreement on behalf of the City and the Sheriff shall administer this Agreement on behalf of the County.

28. AUDIT.

A. Keeping of Records. The County shall maintain adequate financial records during the term of this Agreement to document its charges to the City, and report to the City in a manner acceptable to the City. Records for each fiscal year during the term of this Agreement shall be maintained by the County for a three (3) year period after the City's receipt of the reconciliation for that fiscal year.

B. Access to Records. County shall provide free access to the representatives of City, or its designees, at reasonable times, to all records relating to performance of this Agreement.

The City shall have the right to examine and obtain an independent audit of all records relating to performance of this Agreement of the County at any reasonable time and as often as the City desires. County shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings, and activities related to this Agreement. The City shall have the unrestricted right to Audit the County's records related to the Agreement.

C. Audit by State Auditor. Pursuant to Government Code Section 8546.7, the City and the County shall be subject to examination and audit by the State Auditor for a period of three (3) years after final payment by the City to the County pursuant to this Agreement. The City and the County shall retain all records relating to performance of this Agreement for this three (3) year period, except that records pertaining to any audit then in progress, or any claims or litigation, shall be retained beyond such three (3) year period until final resolution of such audit, claim or litigation.

29. INDEMNIFICATION. The County and its officers, agents and employees shall not be deemed to have assumed any liability for the negligence or other act or omission of City or any of its officers, agents or employees, for any dangerous or defective condition of any public street or Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 22 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

work or property of the City, or for any illegality or unconstitutionality of the City's ordinances. The City shall indemnify and hold the County and its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors harmless from any claim or liability whatsoever, based or asserted upon the condition of any public street or work or property of the City, upon the illegality or unconstitutionality of any City ordinances, or upon any act or omission of the City or its officers, agents, employees subcontractors and independent contractors related to this Agreement, for property damage, bodily injury or death or any other element of damage of any kind or nature, and the City shall defend at its expense including attorney fees, the County and its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors in any legal action or claim of any kind based upon such condition of any such public street or work or property, such alleged illegality or unconstitutionality of a City ordinance, or such alleged acts or omissions. With respect to public streets, works or property, City and County agree that nothing in this Section is intended to require City to indemnify and hold harmless the County for any claim or liability arising prior to the incorporation of City on July 1,2003.

County shall indemnify and hold the City and its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors harmless from and against any loss, damage, claim or liability whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of the County or its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors and independent contractors related to this Agreement, for property damage, bodily injury or death or any other element of damage of any kind or nature, and the County shall indemnify and defend at its expense, including attorney fees, the City and its officers, agents, employees and independent contractors in any legal action or claim of any kind based upon such alleged acts or omissions.

30. INSURANCE. Parties acknowledge that County is a self-insured entity. County has and shall maintain during the term of this Agreement insurance coverage for worker's compensation, general commercial and automobile liability, and professional liability. County shall provide City with certificates of self-insurance, or other documentation, which details the scope, limits, and forms of County's self-insurance coverage. County agrees to provide City with written notification of any changes in coverage applicable to this Agreement and shall do so within thirty (30) days of the change or within ten (10) days in the event the change results in the termination of coverage(s) applicable to this Agreement. In the event County is unable to maintain insurance coverage(s) applicable to this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement.

31. ASSIGNMENT. Neither Party hereto shall assign, subcontract, or transfer any interest in this Agreement, or any duty hereunder, without the prior written consent of the other Party, and no assignment shall be of any force or effect whatsoever unless and until the other party furnishes such written consent. Because of the unique nature of the services contemplated by this Agreement, consent of either Party may be withheld by either Party, within that Party's sole discretion, whether deemed reasonable or not.

32. AMENDMENTS. This Agreement may be modified or amended, or any of its provisions waived, only by a subsequent written agreement, approved by the Sacramento County Board of Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 23 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

Supervisors and the Rancho Cordova City Council and executed by each of the Parties hereto, which amendment shall then be attached to this Agreement and become an integrated part of this Agreement.

33. INTEGRATION. This Agreement and the subjects addressed herein supersede all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, oral or written, which may be related to the subject matter of this Agreement, including any "interim" agreements that the parties may have entered into

34. CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION. It is agreed and acknowledged by the Parties hereto that the provisions of this Agreement have been arrived at through negotiation, and that each of the Parties has had a full and fair opportunity to revise the provisions of this Agreement and to have such provisions reviewed by legal counsel. Therefore, the normal rule of construction that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting Party shall not apply in construing or interpreting this Agreement.

35. WAIVER. The waiver, at any time by any Party, of any of its right with respect to a default or other matter arising in connection with this Agreement, shall not be deemed a waiver with respect to any subsequent default or other matter.

36. SEVERABILITY. The invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability of any provision of this Agreement shall, at the option of either Party, render the other provisions unenforceable, invalid or illegal, provided that such invalidity materially affects the respective rights and obligations of the parties.

37. SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the Parties hereto, provided that the required written consent has been obtained pursuant to Section 31 above.

38. NOTICES. Any notice, demand, request, consent, or approval that either Party hereto may, or is required to, give the other shall be in writing and shall be deemed to have been received three (3) days after deposited in the United States mail, first class postage prepaid, and addressed as follows:

TO COUNTY:

Sacramento County Sheriff
711 G Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
TO CITY:

City Manager
City of Rancho Cordova
2729 Prospect Park Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between
the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Contract: 91-2010

ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

Either Party hereto shall have the right to serve any notice by personal delivery, and change the address at which it will receive such communications by giving fifteen (15) days advance notice to the other party.

39. DISPUTE RESOLUTION. Prior to initiating any legal proceedings with respect to the performance of this Agreement, the Parties shall first engage in a good faith effort to resolve any claims, disputes, or other matters in question between them by mediation. The costs of the mediation shall be borne equally between the parties and shall be held in Sacramento, California.

Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 25 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement the day of the year first written above.

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA CONTRACTOR
Ted A. Gaebler, City Manager Chair of the Board of Supervisors of Sacramento County, California
Date: Date:

Attest:

City Clerk
Date:

Approved as to Form:

41.•••Ir
Adam Lindgren, City Attorney
Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between
the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Contract: 91-2010

ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

ATTACHMENT A
Goals and Performance Measures
City Goals for Police Services
1 Ensuring Order and Civility in Public Places
2 Reduction of Crime and Victimization
3 Holding Offenders Accountable
4 Efficient and Effective Use of the (Operational and Financial) 5 Using Authority and Force Fairly and Effectively
6 Quality Service/Customer Satisfaction
Performance Measures for Each Goal
Ensuring Order and Civility in Public Places
• Neighborhood revitalization activities (code enforcement, Weed & Seed grant, POP projects, changes in property values)*
• Traffic Safety
o Accident rates; fatal, injury and non-injury
o Traffic citations
o Traffic calming measures
o Special program (DUI, seatbelt enforcement, child restraint) • School safety*
o Reported crimes in schools
o Public perception of safety in schools
o Special programs (gang education, youth mentoring)
• Park Safety
o Usage of space
o Reported crime in parks
o Public perception of safety in parks
Reduction of Crime and Victimization
• Part 1 and Part 2 crime rates per capita; citywide, by beats, and neighborhoods • Reporting of crime, and fear of crime; use of alternative measures such as victimization, fear level, domestic violence, and public health surveys )* • Reduction in repeat calls for service (by category and specific locations) • Crime prevention initiatives (measuring crime reduction, target hardening programs)* • Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (OPTED)* Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 27 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

Holding Offenders Accountable
• Arrest data — felony and misdemeanor
• Filing rates*
• Conviction rates*
• Clearance rates for crime category
• Gang related enforcement/court and probation conditions • Parole and probation searches and arrests
• Diversion programs (drug courts, family violence treatment programs, etc.)* Efficient and Effective Use of the (Operational and Financial) • Response time to emergency (life threatening and crimes in progress) calls for service • Response time to non-emergency calls for service
• Alternative methods of service delivery
o Civilian employees
o Volunteers
o Self-reporting (Internet, mail)
o Telephonic response
o Referrals
• Percentage of discretionary patrol time available*
• Resources used for repeat calls for service (by type and location — such as false alarms, domestic violence, chronic nuisances, etc.)*
• Financial accountability
• Meeting budget goals of overtime management
• Risk management (vehicle accident rates, lawsuits)*
• Problem-solving initiatives*
• Community goals (community engagement in goals setting, beat meetings)* • Formal program evaluations*
Using Authority and Force Fairly and Effectively
• Use of force rates (officer involved shootings, less than lethal force, physical force) • Complaints related to force and abuse of authority
• Other citizen complaints
• Officer initiated activity levels (vehicle stops, suspicious person stops) • Confidence/trust levels between community and police department* • Racial profiling data*
• Pursuit analysis
Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 28 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

Quality Service/Customer Satisfaction
• Customer satisfaction surveys*
• Service related complaints
• Feedback systems regarding public perceptions
• Community participation in problem identification and solutions* • Accessibility
*Denotes measures that are non-traditional or not commonly employed by police agencies. 1468949.1
Agreement for Law Enforcement Services between Contract: 91-2010 the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova Page 29 of 29 ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

Cfitir of thTh e oard of Supervisors
of Sacramento County, California
FILED

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AUG 10 2010
RESOLUTION NO. 2010-0600

RETROACTIVE REVENUE CONTRACT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES WITH THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 2010 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2012 — SERVICE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova desires to contract with the County of Sacramento for law enforcement services to be provided by the Sacramento Sheriff's Department NOW, THEREFORE, authorize the Sheriff, or his designee, and the County Executive to approve each subsequent annual Service Plan adopted by the Rancho Cordova City Council, and direct the Office of Budget and Debt Management to make all necessary adjustments to the Sheriff's Department Budget for Fiscal Year 2010-11.

On a motion by Supervisor Yee , seconded by Supervisor
MacGlashan the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Sacramento, State of California this 10th day of August, 2010, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Supervisors, MacGlashan, Yee, Peters, Dickinson
NOES: Supervisors, None
ABSENT: Supervisors, Nottoli
ABSTAIN: Supervisors, None
In accordance with Section 25103 of the tioverment u.
of the State of California a copy of the document has be delivered to the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, Count of Sacramento on ,p7/06
By .7(rtft2a-LA--e---
nenutv Cle oard of Supervisors
ATTEST:
itivainp b mcotrwectlriagre byth5ant sdot at otSiant- Corny Catift irr.,..kmromo ,tria on 70 ea
ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

ChHr of the Board of Supervisors
of Sacramento County, California
FILE

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
G 1 0 2010

K OF THE BOAZ
BY
ATTEST:

Clerk oard of Supervisors
- —47 it a!' Mort MY! Of artz/Afri,litl Etrrt SIgrvi;im. Szimeitit• RESOLUTION NO. 2010-0599
RETROACTIVE REVENUE CONTRACT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES WITH THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1,2010 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2012
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova desires to contract with the County of Sacramento for law enforcement services to be provided by the Sacramento Sheriff's Department BE IT RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Chair of the Board of Supervisors is hereby authorized to execute a Contract for Law Enforcement Services, on behalf of the COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, a political subdivision of the State of California, with the CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA and to do and perform everything necessary to carry out the purpose of this Resolution.

On a motion by Supervisor Yee , seconded by Supervisor
MacGlashan , the foregoing Resolution was passed and adopted by the Board of Supervisors of the County of Sacramento, State of California, this 10th day of August, 2010, by the following vote, to wit:

AYES: Supervisors, MacGlashan, Yee, Peters, Dickinson
NOES: Supervisors, None
ABSENT: Supervisors, Nottoli
ABSTAIN: Supervisors, None
In accordance with Section 25103 of the Government Code of the State of California a copy of the document has been delivered to the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors, County If Sacramento onefrond
7/104(C4-
Deputy Clerk, Board of thpervisors
ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

Internal Services Agency
Department of Personnel Services
Risk and Loss Control Office
Steven B. Page, Manager
Steven C. Szalay, Interim County Executive
Mark Norris, Agency Administrator
c-V•g•
David Devine, Department Director
County of Sacramento
August 13, 2010
City Manager's Office
City of Rancho Cordova
2729 Prospect Park Dr.

Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Attention: Stacy Delaney, CPS/CAP Administrative Assistant Re: Law Enforcement Services
HLIJIHIf" 11)) ,,k‘Friill\\//HNTO
Dear Stacey,
Please accept this letter as certification that the Self-Insurance Program of the County of Sacramento adequately protects against liability arising from activities related to the Sacramento County Sheriff's Department contract for law enforcement services between the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova, contract 91-2010, to provide municipal law enforcement services within the corporate limits of the city.

This certificate is valid from July 1, 2010 to July 1, 2011 and is renewable annually thereafter..

Steven Page, Manager
Risk and Loss Control Division
cc: Nancy Gust, Sheriff's Department, Mail Code 04-293
PO Box 276130, Sacramento, California 95827 • Phone (916) 876-5251 • Fax (916) 876-5156 California Relay Service 7-1-1 • www.saccountynet
ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

Contract Tracking Data
Date Requested: 07/23/10
Contract No.: 91-2010
Resolution No.: 86-2010
Responsible Person & Department: Joe Chinn
City of Rancho Cordova
Contract Transmittal Form

1. Contract Title/Service to be Provided: Law Enforcement Services

2. Contractor/Company Name: County of Sacramento

3. Date of Council Meeting Approval (if applicable):7/19/10 OR check box if this is a City Manager Approved Contract: El

4. Is this an Amendment to an existing contract? No Z Yes El 2007, 6/30/2010

5. Fixed Contract Amount or Not to Exceed Amount: $15.200,000.00 for FY 2010-11 Fill out Numbers *I through 5 and submit to Clerk's Office via email at [email protected] assignment of Contract Number & Resolution Number (if needed). The form will be returned to you via email with the assigned numbers.

6. Expiration Date of Contract (REQUIRED - use an expected date if actual date unknown): 6/30/2012

7. W-9 on File with Finance for Contractor: El or attached 0 Is contractor a sole proprietorship? Yes 0

8. Attachments:
• Insurance with endorsement Amounts required by contract 0 OR waived/changed by Risk Manager 0 If change. list changes:
• Bond or developer guarantee as required by the Contract is attached 0 OR not required El

9. Budget Expense Account Number for Contract:

Project No.:

Finance Director review not required - total does not exceed $5,000 & budget is available.

Department Head initial: 11•04110-
City Attorney review not required -- no substantive changes to standard contract.

Department Head initial: 1■111101-
OR
City Attorney review completed 0 (City Attorney must have received and completed review of redlined version of standard contract with all attachments. Only the redline changes are reviewed.)

12. Contract Executed by Contractor/Service rovider: 0

13. m=aw-Department Head sign-off: 01 *-

14. Explain this contract's purpose, cost & ex cted completion: Law Enforcement Services between the County of Sacramento and the City of Rancho Cordova. Contract will end June 30. 2012.

15. City Clerk's Office to obtain - Finance Director/Risk Manager sign-off Original Contract # and expiration date: 96-

10. 11.

Revised June 2008
ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 2

CONTRACT NO. 91-2010-4
1 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT

SERVICES BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO AND

THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
This Fourth Amendment to the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services ("Fourth Amendment") dated as of June ___ 2023, is entered into by and between the County of Sacramento, a political subdivision of the State of California ("County"), and the City of Rancho Cordova, a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of California ("City"). City and County are hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Parties."

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cordova incorporated on July 1, 2003; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Government Code section 57384, the County continued to provide law enforcement services to the City for the remainder of fiscal year 2003/2004; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2004, City and County entered into an agreement for continued law enforcement services for three (3) years; and
WHEREAS, the Parties entered into a subsequent three (3) year agreement on July 1,2007, which was automatically renewed for an additional three (3) years. The City and County agreed to terminate the 2007 agreement and enter into a new agreement; and WHEREAS, effective July 1, 2010, the Parties entered into the new Agreement for Law Enforcement Services ("Agreement"). The Agreement had a three (3) year term ending on June 30, 2012, with a one (1) year extension option, which was exercised by the City, to a termination date of June 30, 2013; and
WHEREAS, effective July 1, 2013, the Parties entered into the First Amendment to the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services ("First Amendment") to extend the term of the Agreement three (3) years term, to a new termination date of June 30, 2016; and WHEREAS, effective July 1, 2016, the Parties entered into the Second Amendment to the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services ("Second Amendment") to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional five (5) years to a new termination date of June 30, 2021; and WHEREAS, effective July 1, 2021, the Parties entered into the Third Amendment to the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services (“Third Amendment”) to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional two (2) years to a new termination date of June 30, 2023; and WHEREAS, the Parties now desire to enter into this Fourth Amendment to the Agreement for Law Enforcement Services ("Fourth Amendment") to extend the term of the Agreement for an additional three (3) years to a new termination date of June 30, 2026.

ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

CONTRACT NO. 91-2010-4
2 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, conditions and covenants hereinafter set forth, the City and the County hereby agree as follows:

Section 1. TERM. The term of the Agreement is hereby extended to June 30, 2026.

Section 3, 'TERM," Subsection A, "Effective Date and Term," is hereby amended to read as follows:

A. Effectjye Date and Term. This Agreement shall be
effective July 1, 2010, and shall continue in force until June 30, 2026, unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 26 below. The City's obligation to compensate the County for services rendered under this Agreement as set forth in Section 19 and 20 hereof, and the Parties' indemnification obligation set forth in Section 29 hereof shall survive the termination and/or expiration of this Agreement.

Section 2. All other provisions under the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties have executed this F o u r t h Amendment as of the date first written above.

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
__________________________
Micah Runner, City Manager
Date: ___________________
COUNTY
__________________________
Rich Desmond, Chair of the Board of
Supervisors, California
Date: ___________________
ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

CONTRACT NO. 91-2010-4
3 Attest:
______________________________
Stacy Leitner, City Clerk
Date: ___________________
Approved as to form:
______________________________
Adam U. Lindgren, City Attorney
Date: ___________________
ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Contract Law Enforcement Budget & Staffing Plan
For Fiscal Year 2023/2024
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers
Item Proposed Budget Proposed Incr
(Decr)
Percent
Change Notes
Proposed
Budget
Total Personnel Costs 23,700,533 $2,530,794 11.95% 1 $21,169,739 Services & Supplies
Vehicles 1,338,859 89,552 7.17% 2 1,249,307
Other Services & Supplies 2,323,531 258,117 12.50% 2 2,065,414 Total Services & Supplies $ 3,662,390 $ 347,669 10.49% $ 3,314,721 Grants
Overtime 82,000 82,000
Service & Supplies -
Equipment -
Reimbursements (82,000) 4 (82,000)
Total Grants $ - $ - $ -
Support Services, Allocated Services, & Credits $ 2,760,220 $ 661,326 31.51% 3 $ 2,098,894 Total Ongoing Costs $ 30,123,143 $ 3,539,789 13.32% $ 26,583,354 Reimbursements
SRO Position (252,026) (7,583) 3.10% (244,443)
Building Share Costs (80,000) - (80,000)
Total Reimbursements $ (332,026) $ (7,583) 2.34% $ (324,443) $ - TOTAL SERVICE PLAN COSTS $ 29,791,117 $ 3,532,206 13.45% $ 26,258,911 Personnel Allocation Summary Auth Vacant Filled Auth Vacant Filled Auth Vacant Filled Sworn Positions
Captain 1 1 1 1
Lieutenant ~ Asst. Chief 1 1 1 1 2 2
Lieutenant 3 3 3 3
Sergeant 2 2 9 9 11 11
Deputy Sheriff 3 3 50 50 53 53
Total Sworn Positions 10 10 60 60 70 70
Total Sworn Positions Allocated to RCPD 6.0 6.0 60.0 60.0 66.0 66.0 Non-Sworn Positions
Sheriff's Record Officer II 2 2 2 2
Sheriff's Record Officer I 5 5 3 3 8 8
Community Services Officer II 4 1 3 4 1 3
Community Services Officer I 1 (1) 1 (1)
Senior Office Assistant (Confidential)
Total Non-Sworn Positions 7 7 7 5 14 12
Total Non-Sworn Positions Allocated to RCPD 4.2 4.2 7.0 2.0 5.0 11.2 2.0 9.2 Total Positions 17 17 67 2 65 84 2 82
Total Positions Allocated to RCPD 10.2 10.2 67.0 2.0 65.0 77.2 2.0 75.2 Vehicle Allocation
RCPD Shared
(60%)
RCPD Distinct
(100%)
FY 23/24
RCPD
Total
RCPD Shared
(60%)
RCPD
Distinct
(100%)
FY 22/23
RCPD
Total
Marked Motorcycles - Class 101 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Sedan (Parking Enforcement) - Class 110
Marked Patrol Cars - Class 122 3.0 28.0 31.0 3.0 29.0 32.0 Unmarked Cars - Class 124 4.0 11.0 15.0 5.0 10.0 15.0
1/2 Ton Truck - Class 132 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
3/4 Ton Truck - Class 135
3/4 Ton Truck 4X4 - Class 140 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Mini-Van (Equipment/CPS) - Class 150 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 Sport Utility - Class 154 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0
Total Vehicles 8.0 55.0 63.0 9.0 54.0 63.0
Total Vehicles Allocated to RCPD 4.8 55.0 59.8 5.4 54.0 59.4 Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Fiscal Year 2022/2023
FY 2023/2024
SHARED (60%) DISTINCT TOTAL
SERV PLAN RCPD 23.24 x2 Motor Officers.xlsx Page 1 of 8 RCPD Budget & Staffing Plan ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Contract Law Enforcement Budget Detail
For Fiscal Year 2023/2024
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers
Account
Nbr Account Name
FY 23/24
Proposed Budget FY 22/23 Budget
Final Budget
Incr (Decr) Over
Prior Year
Salaries & Benefits
10111000 Regular Employees 11,260,900 9,794,615 1,466,285 10112100 Salaries & Wages - Extra Help 243,322 214,125 29,197 10113200 Salaries & Wages - Time/One Half - Over Time 1,075,090 1,070,501 4,589 10114100 Salaries & Wages - Premium Pay 29,730 25,183 4,547 10114300 Allowances 82,320 71,200 11,120
10115100 Holiday In Lieu Pay 456,158 409,407 46,751
10121000 Retirement - Employer Cost 8,182,912 7,439,078 743,834 10121300 Retire Health Costs 50,180 48,880 1,300
10121400 401A Plan 9,621 8,443 1,178
10122000 Oasdhi - Employer Cost 896,539 793,928 102,611 10123000 Group Ins - Employer Cost 1,342,960 1,244,186 98,773 60654100 Personnel Svc 70,801 50,193 20,609
Total Salaries & Benefits 23,700,533 21,169,739 2,530,794 Services & Supplies
20200500 Advertising/Legal Notices 1,700 1,700 -
20202200 Books/Periodical Supply 600 600 -
20203500 Education & Training Service 45,950 45,950 -
20203800 Employee Recognition 2,900 6,500 (3,600)
20203805 Food Purchases/Services 1,500 - 1,500
20205200 Insurance Premiums 1,971,590 1,685,479 286,111 20206100 Membership Dues 800 800 -
20207600 Office Supplies 20,468 20,468 -
20208100 Postal Services 1,000 1,000 -
20208500 Printing Services 4,000 4,000 -
20219700 Telephone Service 2,200 27,600 (25,400)
20220500 Automotive Maintenance Service 4,000 4,000 -
20222600 Expendable Tools 2,050 2,050 -
20222700 Cell phone/Pager 58,541 37,441 21,100
20223200 Fire/Crash/Rescue Supplies 4,000 4,000 -
20226100 Office Equipment Maintenance Service 300 300 - 20226200 Office Equipment Maintenance Supplies 4,000 4,000 - 20227200 Radio/Electronic Maintenance Supplies 8,821 14,286 (5,465) 20227500 Rent/Leases Equipment 13,200 9,600 3,600
20229100 Other Equipment Maintenance Service 1,000 1,000 - 20229200 Other Equipment Maintenance Supplies 1,000 1,000 - 20231400 Clothing/Personal Supplies 11,386 11,386 -
20233200 Food/Catering Supplies 2,000 1,835 165
20235100 Laundry/Dry Cleaning Service 2,600 600 2,000
20244300 Medical Service 2,000 2,000 -
SERV PLAN RCPD 23.24 x2 Motor Officers.xlsx Page 2 of 8 RCPD Budget Detail ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Contract Law Enforcement Budget Detail
For Fiscal Year 2023/2024
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers
Account
Nbr Account Name
FY 23/24
Proposed Budget FY 22/23 Budget
Final Budget
Incr (Decr) Over
Prior Year
20244400 Laboratory (Medical) Supplies 12,000 10,000 2,000 20259100 Other Prof Serv 3,465 - 3,465
20281100 Data Processing Services 4,565 4,565 -
20281200 Data Processing Supplies 31,000 31,000 -
20286100 Unclassed Expense (Sheriff/Da) 1,100 1,100 -
20289800 Other Operating Expense - Supplies 35,711 35,711 - 20289900 Other Operating Expense - Services 6,000 6,000 - 20292100 GS Printing Services 2,000 2,000 -
20292200 GS Mail/Postage Charges 1,300 1,300 -
20292800 GS Equipment Rental - Light 1,060,147 980,345 79,802 20293800 GS Equipment Fuel - Light 278,712 268,962 9,750 20294000 Fuel Usage Voyager (Motor Units) 15,200 15,200 - 20298700 Gs Telephone Services - 27,359 (27,359)
20298900 Tele Instal 34,451 34,451 -
20291700 Alarm Serv 9,133 9,133 -
Total Services & Supplies 3,662,390 3,314,721 347,669
Grants
OTS Traffic
10113200 Salaries & Wages - Time/One Half - Over Time 82,000 82,000 - 20289800 Other Operating Expense - Supplies - - -
43430110 Equipment - - -
95956900 Rev - State Aid Other Misc. (82,000) (82,000) - Total Grants - - -
Intrafund Charges
60657100 Support Services 2,753,834 2,092,508 661,326
60657100 Cal-ID Cost Share 6,386 6,386
Total Intrafund Charges 2,760,220 2,098,894 661,326
Total Expenditures 30,123,143 26,583,354 3,539,789
SERV PLAN RCPD 23.24 x2 Motor Officers.xlsx Page 3 of 8 RCPD Budget Detail ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Notes for Contract Law Enforcement Budget & Staffing Plan For Fiscal Year 2023/2024
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers
Notes
1 Salary Costs
● Effective June 19, 2022, permanent employees who reach ten years of full-time service shall receive a 2.5% differential.
● FY23/24 Two new additional Motor Deputies added to Salary Costs 2 Other Services & Supplies
3 Support Services, Allocated Services & Credits
●
4 OTS Grants
● The $82,000 received is now one grant OTS funding traffic (STEP) safety only. ● FY23/24 increases per labor agreements: LEMA ~ COLA 4% , DSA ~ COLA 4%+ Equity 2.5%; Non-Sworn ~ COLA 4% ●20205200 - The budgeted insurance premium is calculated by County Risk Management and outside actuaries based on prior year loss experience. The amount budgeted for FY23/24 was $1,971,590 (WC $1,286,457 + Liability $685,133). These estimates indicate a 29% to 32% overall increase over last year. Factors affecting the increase are cited as the aging workforce, medical cost inflation, and increased severity of workplace injuries. The WC experience rating modification factor is increasing from 215% to 246%, which is a reflection of the losses experienced by the County and other entities covered within the program over the past seven years.

Units are based on a 3 year average of the 3 most recent fiscal years and the estimated current year end. All costs are based on FY21/22 actuals as that was the last complete fiscal year at time of budget preparation. These cost will stay static for the 2 year budget cycle [FY23/24 & FY24/25]. The increased Communications costs is due to and increase in overall Bureau costs as well as the expiration of one time revenue offsets. Rancho Cordova's percent of overall CAD events has also increased from 12.33% to 13.14% driving RCPD cost share higher.

SERV PLAN RCPD 23.24 x2 Motor Officers.xlsx Page 4 of 8 Notes ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Contract Law Enforcement Budget - Annual Personnel Costs For Fiscal Year 2023/2024
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers
10111000 10112100 10113200 10114100 10114300 10115100 10121000 10121100 10121200 10121300 10121400 10122000 10123000 60695102 60695103 60695600 Cost Center Fund Center Program Job Title PER
Position
Number Last Name First Name FTE
Regular
Employees Extra Help
Time One Half
OT Premium Pay Allowances
Hol in Lieu
Pay Retirement
1995/2003
POB Debt Svc
2004 POB
Debt Svc
Health SvgsER Cost 401A - Plan OASDHI Group InsBenefit Admin ACP
Empl Svcs
ACP
DPS Svc
Teams ACP
7407478000 Zz OverTime Zz OverTime 1,075,090 82,244 1,157,334 7407478000 Zz Extra Help ZZ On-Call 243,322 9,125 3,528 255,975 7407478000 7407478 Pal Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1038021 109862 Loudon Sariah 1.0 145,110 1,200 5,997 77,174 19,035 9,766 650 11,652 22,413 168 575 174 293,914 7407478000 7407478 Admin Sheriff Lieutenant 1020687 107417 Carver Ian 1.0 215,346 7,138 - 8,528 130,938 32,297 16,569 650 2,310 10,587 22,428 168 575 174 447,709 7407478000 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 1022341 127080 Day Jeremy 1.0 180,322 1,200 6,952 106,826 26,349 13,518 650 9,714 22,413 168 575 174 368,861 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sheriff Captain 1014600 109797 Luke Brandon 0.6 154,641 5,111 - 5,645 93,747 23,123 11,863 390 1,654 6,811 4,742 101 345 104 308,277 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sheriff Lieutenant 1017489 109873 Tamayo Matthew 0.6 140,172 4,632 - 5,117 84,975 20,960 10,753 390 1,499 6,546 13,457 101 345 104 289,051 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sheriff Records Officer 1 1029295 134913 Pelster Gayle 0.6 52,695 720 2,567 13,088 3,228 1,656 390 4,282 12,880 101 345 104 92,056 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sheriff Records Officer 1 1036810 115041 Mooney Francis 0.6 51,348 720 2,567 12,025 2,966 1,522 390 4,179 13,448 101 345 104 89,715 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sheriff Records Officer 2 1024927 109022 Bell Glirea 0.6 73,192 720 2,952 17,970 4,432 2,274 390 5,879 8,250 101 345 104 116,609 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sheriff Sergeant 1020978 128135 Spurgeon James 0.6 103,137 720 4,171 61,231 15,103 7,748 390 5,904 13,448 101 345 104 212,402 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sr Office Assistant 1040956 109817 Rounds Carol 0.6 31,534 - - 6,941 1,712 878 390 2,413 5,789 101 345 104 50,207 7407478100 7407478 Hot Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1030736 102713 Pendley Kayla 1.0 145,110 1,200 5,997 86,328 21,293 10,924 650 11,652 22,413 168 575 174 306,484 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1031612 109586 Leonard Jay 1.0 158,846 1,200 5,997 84,133 20,752 10,646 650 12,703 22,413 168 575 174 318,257 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1031814 113956 Sacco Jaie 1.0 154,554 1,200 5,997 91,259 22,509 11,548 650 12,374 22,413 168 575 174 323,421 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1032872 116973 Thompson Nicholas 1.0 145,110 1,200 5,997 77,174 19,035 9,766 650 11,652 22,413 168 575 174 293,914 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1033446 109501 Saelee Gen 1.0 161,712 1,200 5,997 85,585 21,110 10,830 650 9,466 9,649 168 575 174 307,116 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1034013 118501 Bates Jonathan 1.0 151,406 1,200 5,997 80,363 19,822 10,169 650 12,133 9,649 168 575 174 292,306 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1034020 112592 Gordon Joseph 1.0 145,110 1,200 5,997 77,174 19,035 9,766 650 11,652 22,413 168 575 174 293,914 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035700 133695 Meza Samuel 1.0 145,110 1,200 5,997 77,174 19,035 9,766 650 11,652 22,413 168 575 174 293,914 7407478100 7407478 SRO Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035702 129132 Cervantes Veronica 1.0 138,815 1,200 5,997 73,985 18,249 9,362 650 11,170 9,649 168 575 174 269,994 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035738 106097 Schmidt Eric 1.0 139,177 1,200 5,997 74,168 18,294 9,385 650 11,198 22,413 168 575 174 283,399 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035844 100519 Antonini Myles 1.0 160,026 1,200 5,997 84,731 20,899 10,722 650 12,792 22,413 168 575 174 320,347 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035887 107158 Bollinger Matthew L. 1.0 126,222 1,200 5,997 67,603 16,675 8,555 650 10,207 9,649 168 575 174 247,675 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035888 110222 Wihtol Brett 1.0 145,110 1,200 5,997 77,174 19,035 9,766 650 11,652 9,649 168 575 174 281,150 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035953 108909 Watts Marshal L. 1.0 138,815 1,200 5,997 73,985 18,249 9,362 650 11,170 22,413 168 575 174 282,758 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1036230 102767 Cortez Sabrina 1.0 132,518 1,200 5,997 70,794 17,462 8,958 650 10,689 22,413 168 575 174 271,598 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1036558 134414 Tran Alex 1.0 146,746 1,200 5,997 78,004 19,240 9,871 650 11,777 9,649 168 575 174 284,051 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1036656 134413 Barnes-King Stefiana 1.0 119,926 1,200 5,997 64,413 15,888 8,151 650 9,725 9,649 168 575 174 236,516 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1036964 134412 Trau Leslie 1.0 140,103 1,200 5,997 74,637 18,410 9,445 650 11,269 22,413 168 575 174 285,041 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037328 105176 Guerra Christopher 1.0 138,815 1,200 5,997 73,985 18,249 9,362 650 11,170 9,649 168 575 174 269,994 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037343 108294 Singh Parneet 1.0 146,746 1,200 5,997 78,004 19,240 9,871 650 11,777 9,649 168 575 174 284,051 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037344 121604 Smith Tyler 1.0 146,069 1,200 5,997 77,661 19,155 9,827 650 11,725 1,467 168 575 174 274,668 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037420 102392 Booth George 1.0 132,518 1,200 5,997 70,794 17,462 8,958 650 10,689 22,413 168 575 174 271,598 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037579 108527 Drake Evan 1.0 138,815 1,200 5,997 73,985 18,249 9,362 650 11,170 22,413 168 575 174 282,758 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037584 134488 Porterfield Nathan 1.0 138,815 1,200 5,997 73,985 18,249 9,362 650 11,170 22,413 168 575 174 282,758 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1038042 134495 Thompson Hunter 1.0 138,815 1,200 5,997 73,985 18,249 9,362 650 11,170 22,413 168 575 174 282,758 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1038145 124483 Gonzalez Lilia 1.0 138,815 1,200 5,997 73,985 18,249 9,362 650 11,170 22,413 168 575 174 282,758 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 1012069 106166 Rogers Michael 1.0 188,288 1,200 6,952 111,341 27,463 14,089 650 9,840 12,201 168 575 174 372,941 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 1013463 121605 McCue Thomas 1.0 188,288 1,200 6,952 111,341 27,463 14,089 650 9,840 21,466 168 575 174 382,206 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 1024699 134892 McCoy Michael 1.0 188,288 1,200 6,952 111,341 27,463 14,089 650 9,840 22,413 168 575 174 383,153 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 1031443 119602 DeCanio Aaron 1.0 185,062 1,200 6,952 109,012 26,888 13,794 650 9,840 22,413 168 575 174 376,728 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriffs Community Services Officer 2 1028151 133523 Weininger Jeremy 1.0 76,060 - 3,706 18,649 4,600 2,360 650 6,103 22,413 168 575 174 135,458 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriffs Community Services Officer 2 1038438 132458 Vogt Kimberly 1.0 78,004 - 3,706 17,984 4,436 2,276 650 6,251 9,649 168 575 174 123,873 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng A 1038774 135183 Cowan Joseph A 1.0 132,192 1,200 5,711 70,483 17,385 8,919 650 10,641 9,649 168 575 174 257,747 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng A 1039224 109440 Francis Olivia 1.0 132,192 1,200 5,711 70,483 17,385 8,919 650 10,641 9,649 168 575 174 257,747 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng A 1039555 122361 Hancock Michael 1.0 114,206 1,200 5,711 61,370 15,137 7,766 650 9,266 22,413 168 575 174 238,636 7407478110 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Lieutenant 1010870 101163 Fisher Steven 0.6 129,208 4,283 - 5,117 78,564 19,378 9,942 390 1,386 6,352 13,457 101 345 104 268,627 7407478110 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Lieutenant 1020984 122065 Merideth Richard 0.6 129,208 4,283 - 5,117 78,564 19,378 9,942 390 1,386 6,352 13,457 101 345 104 268,627 7407478110 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Lieutenant 1022283 125044 Daniels Michael 0.6 129,208 4,283 - 5,117 78,564 19,378 9,942 390 1,386 6,352 13,457 101 345 104 268,627 7407478121 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037321 134529 Blackford Taylor 1.0 138,815 1,200 5,997 73,985 18,249 9,362 650 11,170 21,466 168 575 174 281,811 7407478202 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 1022362 134891 Steindorf Eric 1.0 180,322 1,200 6,952 106,826 26,349 13,518 650 9,714 1,467 168 575 174 347,915 7407478205 7407478 SRO Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035019 131552 Blackford Thomas 1.0 145,110 1,200 5,997 77,174 19,035 9,766 650 11,652 22,413 168 575 174 293,914 7407478300 7407478 Invest Deputy Sheriff Detective Tier 1 1002851 102654 Mulherin Justin 1.0 155,527 1,200 5,997 92,232 22,749 11,671 650 12,449 12,201 168 575 174 315,593 7407478300 7407478 Invest Deputy Sheriff Detective Tier 1 1030725 102493 Francis Mark 1.0 180,664 1,200 5,997 106,479 26,264 13,474 650 9,742 22,413 168 575 174 367,800 7407478300 7407478 Invest Deputy Sheriff Detective Tier 1 1034704 105810 Cacciato Russell 1.0 151,406 1,200 5,997 80,363 19,822 10,169 650 12,133 22,413 168 575 174 305,070 7407478300 7407478 Invest Deputy Sheriff Detective Tier 1 1036954 102275 Cleveringa Ryan 1.0 151,406 1,200 5,997 89,484 22,072 11,323 650 12,133 21,466 168 575 174 316,648 7407478300 7407478 Invest Sheriff Sergeant 1023266 128128 Vicory Dana 1.0 194,383 1,200 6,952 114,797 28,315 14,526 650 9,968 11,694 168 575 174 383,402 7407478410 7407478 POP Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1034803 126153 Stone Ha 0.6 87,066 720 3,598 46,304 11,421 5,859 390 6,991 5,789 101 345 104 168,688 7407478410 7407478 POP Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035030 133513 Goold Jordan 0.6 79,511 720 3,598 42,476 10,477 5,375 390 6,413 13,448 101 345 104 162,958 7407478410 7407478 POP Sheriff Sergeant 1014292 102877 Garcia Ralph 0.6 112,974 720 4,171 66,807 16,478 8,454 390 5,904 13,448 101 345 104 229,896 7407478510 7407478 Crime Prev Sheriff Records Officer 1 1035674 135801 Chuong Brianna 0.6 51,456 720 2,328 11,997 2,959 1,518 390 4,170 5,789 101 345 104 81,878 7407478610 7407478 Crime Analy Sheriff Records Officer 1 1038718 136065 Sanchez Hernandez Monica 0.6 56,739 720 2,567 13,212 3,259 1,672 390 4,592 880 101 345 104 84,581 7407478610 7407478 Crime Analy Sheriff Records Officer 2 1004331 115050 Rodrigues Jeffrey 0.6 73,192 720 2,952 17,970 4,432 2,274 390 5,879 13,448 101 345 104 121,807 7407478700 7407478 PAL Sheriff Records Officer 1 1031617 131558 Aldama Tina 1.0 103,997 1,200 4,279 25,201 6,216 3,189 650 8,375 22,413 168 575 174 176,437 7407478701 7407478 Hot Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1034417 106702 Lopez Cameron 1.0 132,518 1,200 5,997 70,794 17,462 8,958 650 10,689 22,413 168 575 174 271,598 7407478702 7407478 CIT Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1036976 116981 Jackson Corey 1.0 140,103 1,200 5,997 74,637 18,410 9,445 650 11,269 9,649 168 575 174 272,277 7407478410 7407478 POP Deputy Sheriff Rng B 105948 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 0.6 87,066 720 3,598 46,304 11,421 5,859 390 6,991 5,789 101 345 104 168,688 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 116959 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 1.0 158,846 1,200 5,997 84,133 20,752 10,646 650 12,703 22,413 168 575 174 318,257 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 125033 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 1.0 158,846 1,200 5,997 84,133 20,752 10,646 650 12,703 22,413 168 575 174 318,257 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 128338 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 1.0 188,288 1,200 6,952 111,341 27,463 14,089 650 9,840 22,413 168 575 174 383,153 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriffs Community Services Officer 2 126191 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 1.0 76,060 - 3,706 18,649 4,600 2,360 650 6,103 22,413 168 575 174 135,458 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriffs Community Services Officer 2 129099 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 1.0 76,060 - 3,706 18,649 4,600 2,360 650 6,103 22,413 168 575 174 135,458 7407478701 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 114194 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 1.0 114,206 1,200 - 58,476 14,423 7,400 650 8,829 15,652 168 575 174 221,753 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1033444 108012 Monahan Travis 1.0 138,815 1,200 5,997 73,985 18,249 9,362 650 11,170 9,649 168 575 174 269,994 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1033448 102394 Wycoff-Clark Brian 1.0 159,226 1,200 5,997 84,325 20,799 10,671 650 12,731 1,467 168 575 174 297,983 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1033453 105988 King Logan 1.0 151,406 1,200 5,997 80,363 19,822 10,169 650 12,133 22,413 168 575 174 305,070 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1033465 105595 Homen Steven 1.0 157,702 1,200 5,997 83,554 20,609 10,573 650 12,615 22,413 168 575 174 316,230 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1034028 124519 Meier Kevin 1.0 166,546 1,200 5,997 88,035 21,714 11,140 650 9,576 1,467 168 575 174 307,242 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1034791 106749 Firman Jonathan 1.0 151,406 1,200 5,997 80,363 19,822 10,169 650 12,133 9,649 168 575 174 292,306 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1036551 134415 Gadd Brian 1.0 133,463 1,200 5,997 71,272 17,580 9,019 650 10,761 9,649 168 575 174 260,508 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B New New New New 1.0 152,171 1,200 7,609 91,243 22,505 11,546 650 12,315 22,413 168 575 174 322,569 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B New New New New 1.0 152,171 1,200 7,609 91,243 22,505 11,546 650 12,315 22,413 168 575 174 322,569 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Sheriff Records Officer 1 1035490 135209 Nefedov Aleksey 1.0 85,580 1,200 4,279 20,043 4,944 2,536 650 6,966 21,466 168 575 174 148,581 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Sheriff Records Officer 1 1038661 134929 Kanuha Loren 1.0 90,072 1,200 4,279 21,996 5,425 2,783 650 7,310 22,413 168 575 174 157,045 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Sheriff Sergeant 1016385 135168 Barry Sean 1.0 196,258 1,200 6,952 115,859 28,577 14,661 650 9,968 22,413 168 575 174 397,455 Grand Total 77.2 11,260,900 243,322 1,075,090 29,730 82,320 456,158 5,961,508 1,468,184 753,220 50,180 9,621 896,539 1,342,960 12,974 44,395 13,432 23,700,533 Grand Total
ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Annual Vehicle Costs
For Fiscal Year 2023/2024
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers
Cost Center Vehicle Type Vehicle Description Vehicle #
Veh
Count
RC
Share Fixed Costs
Rate per
Mile
Estimated
Mileage
Total
Variable
One Time
Purchase and
Build-Out Total Cost
7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101002 1 1 10,975 - - - 10,975 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101003 1 1 10,975 - - - 10,975 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101004 1 1 10,975 - - - 10,975 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101300 1 1 10,975 - - - 10,975 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101001 1 1 10,975 - - - 10,975 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101500 1 1 10,975 - - - 10,975 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101501 1 1 10,975 - - - 10,975 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101502 1 1 10,975 - - - 10,975 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101503 1 1 10,975 - - - 10,975 101 Total 9 9 98,775 - 98,775
7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122012 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122016 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122023 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122108 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122121 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478702 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122122 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122124 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478121 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122131 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122139 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122147 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122212 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122213 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122243 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122352 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122354 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122355 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122552 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122704 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122728 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122758 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122767 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122768 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122787 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122829 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478122 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122833 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122925 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122829 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122925 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 122 Total 28 28 726,236 188,160 914,396

VARIABLE COST
ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

7407478000 124 Undercover 124023
11 8,268 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,468
7407478300 124 Undercover 12403511 8,268 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,468 7407478000 124 Undercover 12402911 8,268 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,468 7407478300 124 Undercover 12436011 8,268 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,468 7407478100 124 Undercover 12450611 8,268 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,468 7407478000 124 Undercover 12450811 8,268 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,468 7407478202 124 Undercover 12452411 8,268 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,468 7407478000 124 Undercover 12474211 8,268 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,468 7407478300 124 Undercover 12477611 8,268 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,468 7407478000 124 Undercover 12487111 8,268 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,468 7407478300 124 Undercover 12494511 8,268 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,468 124 Total 11 11 90,948 46,200 - 137,148
7407478100 132 1/2 Ton Pickup 13231111 7,164 0.28 10,000 2,800 9,964 132 Total11 7,164 2,800 9,964
7407478900 154 SUV 154-00611 13,636 0.28 6,000 1,680 15,316 7407478700 154 SUV 154-52011 13,636 0.28 6,000 1,680 15,316 7407478400 154 SUV 154-91011 13,636 0.28 6,000 1,680 15,316 154 Total33 40,908 5,040 45,948
7407478702 140 3/4 Ton Truck 4x4 14081011 9,873 0.28 20,000 5,600 15,473 140 Total11 9,873 5,600 15,473
7407478500 150 mini van 15040611 7,582 0.28 12,000 3,360 10,942 7407478700 150 mini van 15011811 7,582 0.28 12,000 3,360 10,942 150 Total22 15,164 6,720 21,884
7407478000 TOTAL 55 55 989,068 254,520 - 1,243,588
7407478110 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 1223471 0.6 15,562 0.28 24,000 4,032 19,594 7407478110 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 1223481 0.6 15,562 0.28 24,000 4,032 19,594 7407478110 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 1223491 0.6 15,562 0.28 24,000 4,032 19,594 122 Total3 1.8 46,687 12,096 58,783
7407478010 124 Undercover 1241161 0.6 4,961 0.28 15,000 2,520 7,481 7407478010 124 Undercover 1241271 0.6 4,961 0.28 15,000 2,520 7,481 7407478010 124 Undercover 1245881 0.6 4,961 0.28 15,000 2,520 7,481 7407478410 124 Undercover 1248751 0.6 4,961 0.28 15,000 2,520 7,481 124 Total4 2.4 19,843 10,080 29,923
7407478010 150 Mini-Van 1509421 0.6 4,549 0.28 12,000 2,016 6,565 150 Total1 0.6 4,549 2,016 6,565
7407478010 TOTAL8 4.8 71,079 24,192 95,271
TOTAL 63 59.8 1,060,147 278,712 - 1,338,859
ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Law Enforcement Services Support Costs
FY 21/22 Actuals for Use in FY 23/24
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers

CURRENT

YEAR PRIOR YEAR
FUND

CENTER DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
GRAND
TOTAL
GRAND

TOTAL CHANGE
7407401 DEPT WIDE UNDISTRIBUTED COSTS FTE $ 190 73.2 $ 13,908 75.2 $ 144,534 6 $ 1,140 6 $ 11,532 $ 15,048 $ 156,066 $ (141,018) 7407405 HUMAN RESOURCES FTE $ 488 73.2 $ 35,722 75.2 $ 21,206 $ - - $ - $ 35,722 $ 21,206 $ 14,516 7407411 RECORDS - REPORTS REPORT $ 27.68 4,014 $ 111,126 3,670 $ 71,808 $ - - $ - $ 111,126 $ 71,808 $ 39,318 7407411 RECORDS - CITATIONS CITATION $ 27 129 $ 3,516 170 $ 3,275 $ - - $ - $ 3,516 $ 3,275 $ 241 7407412 CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION (CSI) HOUR $ 100 932 $ 93,200 731 $ 51,901 $ - - $ - $ 93,200 $ 51,901 $ 41,299 7407412 CSI PHOTOS EACH $ 15 25 $ 375 43 $ 645 $ - - $ - $ 375 $ 645 $ (270) 7407413 COMMUNICATIONS % CAD $ 1,299,894 1 $ 1,299,894 1 $ 843,260 $ - $ 1,299,894 $ 843,260 $ 456,634 7407414 PROPERTY WAREHOUSE % CASES $ 195,967 1 $ 195,967 1 $ 165,369 $ - - $ - $ 195,967 $ 165,369 $ 30,598 7407415 FISCAL FTE $ 305 73.2 $ 22,326 75.2 $ 3,384 6 $ 1,830 6 $ 270 $ 24,156 $ 3,654 $ 20,502 7407419 TRAINING - RANGE SWORN FTE $ 1,475 62 $ 91,450 64 $ 97,664 6 $ 8,850 6 $ 9,156 $ 100,300 $ 106,820 $ (6,520) 7407419 TRAINING - IN SERVICE & EVOC CONTACT HRS. $ 172,845 1 $ 172,845 1 $ 67,244 $ - $ 172,845 $ 67,244 $ 105,601 7407421 JAIL ACCESS FEES - INTAKE EACH $ 751 41 $ 30,775 41 $ 30,775 $ - - $ - $ 30,775 $ 30,775 $ 0 7407421 JAIL ACCESS FEES - CLASSIFICATION EACH $ 123 54 $ 6,617 54 $ 6,617 $ - - $ - $ 6,617 $ 6,617 $ (0) 7407431 CENTRALIZED INVESTIGATIONS HOUR $ 170 941 $ 159,970 941 $ 123,271 $ - - $ - $ 159,970 $ 123,271 $ 36,699 7407450 TRAINING - PATROL SWORN FTE $ 188 56 $ 10,528 58 $ 13,572 6 $ 1,128 6 $ 1,404 $ 11,656 $ 14,976 $ (3,320) 7407456 ALARM ORDINACE PERMIT $ 218 510 $ 111,180 510 $ 72,420 $ - $ - $ 111,180 $ 72,420 $ 38,760 7407472 COURT LIAISON (SUBPOENAS) SUBPOEANA $ 8 3,072 $ 24,576 3,072 $ 43,008 $ - - $ - $ 24,576 $ 43,008 $ (18,432) 7407472 FIELD SERVICES (TECH SERVICES) FTE $ 6,208 73 $ 454,426 75 $ 417,375 6 $ 37,248 6 $ 33,390 $ 491,674 $ 450,765 $ 40,909 7407473 DEPARTMENT REPLACEMENTS FTE $ 321 73 $ 23,479 75 $ 23,224 6 $ 1,925 6 $ 1,858 $ 25,404 $ 25,082 $ 322 TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICE COSTS $ 2,861,879 $ 2,200,553 $ 52,121 $ 57,610 $ 2,913,999 $ 2,258,162 $ 655,837

SUPPORT SERVICE CREDITS
7407456 ALARM - PERMIT FEES PERMIT $ (50) 516.9 $ (25,845) 550 $ (25,845) 0 $ - 0 $ - $ (25,845) $ (25,845) $ - 7407456 ALARM - FALSE ALARM FEES ACTUAL $ (82,200) $ (82,200) 0 $ - $ - $ (82,200) $ (82,200) $ - TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICE CREDITS $ (108,045) $ (108,045) $ - $ - $ (108,045) $ (108,045) $ - TOTAL COST $ 2,753,834 $ 2,092,508 $ 52,121 $ 57,610 $ 2,805,954 $ 2,150,117 $ 655,837 Notes:

SUPPORT SERVICE COSTS

1. Regionalized Services included at no additional costs are as follows: Internal Affairs; Special Investigations Bureau; Narcotics/Gangs; Critical Incident Negotiating Team (CINT); Special Enforcement Detail (SED); Canine above and beyond RCPD exclusive program; Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT); Explosive Ordinance (EOD); Warrants Processing; Air Operations; Pre-employment/Fair Employment/ Employee Relations.

2. Starting FY21/22, the methodology for communications charges changed. Contract Cities are now charged based on the percentage share of actual prior year CAD events. The reason for this change was to ensure cost neutrality for the County as well as provide a more fair and accurate method of cost sharing. Prior years, the unit cost was based on radio count and contract cities were charged a per radio share of costs based on the number of radios issued to the contract.

SUPPORT SERVICE COSTS RCPD - MAIN RCPD - MEASURE H TOTALS & CHANGE

CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR
SERV PLAN RCPD 23.24 x2 Motor Officers.xlsx Page 9 of 9 Alloc-Costs ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Measure H Crime Suppression Budget
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
1st Draft- Status Quo
Item Proposed Budget Proposed Incr
(Decr)
Percent
Change Notes
Adopted
Budget
Total Personnel Costs $1,704,923 $134,589 8.57% 1 $ 1,570,334 Services & Supplies
Vehicles 65,314 4,964 8.23% 60,350
Other Services & Supplies 166,110 11,044 7.12% 155,066
Total Services & Supplies $ 231,424 $ 16,008 7.43% $ 215,416 Support Services, Allocated Services, & Credits $ 52,121 $ (5,489) -9.53% $ 57,610 Total Ongoing Costs $ 1,988,468 $ 145,108 7.87% $ 1,843,360 Reimbursements
SRO Position -
Total Reimbursements $ - $ - $ -
TOTAL SERVICE PLAN COSTS $ 1,988,468 $ 145,108 7.87% $ 1,843,360 Personnel Allocation Summary Auth Vacant Filled Auth Vacant Filled Sworn Positions
Deputy Sheriff 6 6 6 6
Total Sworn Positions 6 6 6 6
Total Sworn Positions Allocated to RCPD 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Total Positions 6 6 6 6
Total Positions Allocated to RCPD 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Allocation
Fiscal Year
2023/2024
Fiscal Year
2022/2023
Marked Patrol Cars - Class 122 2.0 2.0
Total Vehicles 2.0 2.0
Total Vehicles Allocated to RCPD 2.0 2.0
Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Fiscal Year 2022/2023
Fiscal Year 2023/2024 Fiscal Year 2022/2023
SERV PLAN RCPD CSU 23.24 Status Quo.xlsx Page 1 of 6 RCPD Budget & Staffing Plan ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Measure H Crime Suppression Budget - Notes
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
1st Draft- Status Quo
Notes
1 ● Effective June 19, 2022, permanent employees who reach ten years of full-time service shall receive a 2.5% differential. 2 Other Services & Supplies
3 Support Services, Allocated Services & Credits
● FY23/24 increases per labor agreements: LEMA ~ COLA 4% , DSA ~ COLA 4%+ Equity 2.5%, Non-Sworn ~ COLA 4% ●20205200 - The budgeted insurance premium is calculated by County Risk Management and outside actuaries based on prior year loss experience.

The amount budgeted for FY23/24 was $156,510 (WC $102,643 + Liability $53,867). These estimates indicate a 29% to 32% overall increase over last year. Factors affecting the increase are cited as the aging workforce, medical cost inflation, and increased severity of workplace injuries. The WC experience rating modification factor is increasing from 215% to 246%, which is a reflection of the losses experienced by the County and other entities covered within the program over the past seven years.

Units are based on a 3 year average of the 3 most recent fiscal years and the estimated current year end. All costs are based on FY21/22 actuals as that was the last complete fiscal year at time of budget preparation. These cost will stay static for the 2 year budget cycle [FY23/24 & FY24/25].

SERV PLAN RCPD CSU 23.24 Status Quo.xlsx Page 2 of 6 Notes ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Measure H Crime Suppression Budget - Detail
Fiscal Year 2023/2024
Draft 1- Status Quo
Account
Nbr Account Name
FY 23-24
Proposed
Budget
FY 22-23 Budget
Final Budget
Incr (Decr) Over
Prior Year
Salaries & Benefits
10111000 Regular Employees 834,545 747,913 86,632
10113200 Salaries & Wages - Time/One Half - Overtime 28,770 24,779 3,991 10114300 Allowances 7,200 6,000 1,200
10115100 Holiday In Lieu Pay 35,982 28,025 7,957
10121000 Retirement - Employer Cost 610,723 577,627 33,096 10121300 Retire Health Costs 3,900 3,900 -
10122000 Oasdhi - Employer Cost 69,351 61,991 7,360
10123000 Group Ins - Employer Cost 108,949 116,094 (7,145) 60654100 Personnel Svc 5,503 4,005 1,498
Total Salaries & Benefits 1,704,923 1,570,334 134,589
Services & Supplies
20203500 Education & Training Service 1,500 1,500 -
20205200 Insurance Premiums 156,510 146,101 10,409
20207600 Office Supplies 800 800 -
20219700 Telephone Service 2,800 2,400 400
20222700 Cell phone/Pager 4,500 600 3,900
20233200 Food/Catering Supplies - 1,665 (1,665)
20244300 Medical Service - 2,000 (2,000)
20292800 GS Equipment Rental - Light 51,874 44,544 7,330 20293800 GS Equipment Fuel - Light 13,440 15,806 (2,366) Total Services & Supplies 231,424 215,416 16,008
Intrafund Charges
60657100 Support Services 52,121 57,610 (5,489)
Total Intrafund Charges 52,121 57,610 (5,489)
Total Expenditures 1,988,468 1,843,360 145,108
SERV PLAN RCPD CSU 23.24 Status Quo.xlsx Page 3 of 6 RCPD Budget Detail ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Measure H Crime Suppression Budget - Annual Personnel Costs Fiscal Year 2023/2024
1st Draft- Status Quo
10111000 101132000 10114300 10115100 10121000 10121100 10121200 10121300 10122000 10123000 60695102 60695103 60695105 Fund Center Job Title Last Name First Name Function FTE Position
Number Cost Center
Regular
Employees
Time/One
Half OT Allowances
Hol in Lieu
Pay Retirement
1995/2003
POB Debt
Svc
2004 POB
Debt Svc
Health SvgsER Cost OASDHI Group InsBenefit
Admin ACP
Empl Svcs
ACP
DPS Svc
Teams ACP
7407478 Deputy Sheriff Daniel Nathan CSU 1 106717 7407478200 145,110 1,200 5,997 77,174 19,035 9,766 650 11,652 22,413 168 575 174 293,914 7407478 Deputy Sheriff Kurtz Austin CSU 1 100669 7407478200 145,110 1,200 5,997 77,174 19,035 9,766 650 11,652 22,413 168 575 174 293,914 7407478 Deputy Sheriff Farrar Lucas CSU 1 103306 7407478200 153,067 1,200 5,997 81,206 20,030 10,276 650 12,261 9,649 168 575 174 295,253 7407478 Deputy Sheriff Garrison Jaycob CSU 1 133509 7407478200 132,518 1,200 5,997 70,794 17,462 8,958 650 10,689 9,649 168 575 174 258,834 7407478 Deputy Sheriff Kimbrell Jason FOZ/POP 1 110954 7407478205 126,222 1,200 5,997 67,603 16,675 8,555 650 10,207 22,413 168 575 174 260,439 7407478 Deputy Sheriff Womack Adam Youth 1 101373 7407478210 132,518 1,200 5,997 70,794 17,462 8,958 650 10,689 22,413 168 575 174 271,598 28,770 2,201 30,971
Grand Total 6 $ 834,545 $ 28,770 $ 7,200 $ 35,982 $ 444,745 $ 109,699 $ 56,279 $ 3,900 $ 69,351 $ 108,949 $ 1,008 $ 3,450 $ 1,044 $ 1,704,923 Grand Total
SERV PLAN RCPD CSU 23.24 Status Quo.xlsx Page 4 of 6 CSU PERSONNEL ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Measure H Crime Suppression Budget - Annual Vehicle Costs Fiscal Year 2023/2024
1st Draft- Status Quo
Cost Center Vehicle Type Vehicle Description Vehicle #
Veh
Count
RC
Share
One Time
Purchase and
Build-out Fixed Costs
Rate per
Mile
Estimated
Mileage
Total
Variable Total Cost
7407478200 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122600 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 7407478200 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122602 1 1 25,937 0.28 24,000 6,720 32,657 122 Total 2 2 - 51,874 13,440 65,314
TOTAL 2 2 - 51,874 13,440 65,314

VARIABLE COST
SERV PLAN RCPD CSU 23.24 Status Quo.xlsx Page 5 of 6 VEHICLES ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Law Enforcement Services Support Costs
FY 21/22 Actuals for Use in FY 23/24

CURRENT

YEAR PRIOR YEAR
FUND

CENTER DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST GRAND TOTAL GRAND TOTAL CHANGE
7407401 DEPT WIDE UNDISTRIBUTED COSTS FTE $ 190 73.2 $ 13,908 75.2 $ 144,534 6 $ 1,140 6 $ 11,532 $ 15,048 $ 156,066 $ (141,018) 7407405 HUMAN RESOURCES FTE $ 488 73.2 $ 35,722 75.2 $ 21,206 $ - - $ - $ 35,722 $ 21,206 $ 14,516 7407411 RECORDS - REPORTS REPORT $ 27.68 4,014 $ 111,126 3,670 $ 71,808 $ - - $ - $ 111,126 $ 71,808 $ 39,318 7407411 RECORDS - CITATIONS CITATION $ 27 129 $ 3,516 170 $ 3,275 $ - - $ - $ 3,516 $ 3,275 $ 241 7407412 CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION (CSI) HOUR $ 100 932 $ 93,200 731 $ 51,901 $ - - $ - $ 93,200 $ 51,901 $ 41,299 7407412 CSI PHOTOS EACH $ 15 25 $ 375 43 $ 645 $ - - $ - $ 375 $ 645 $ (270) 7407413 COMMUNICATIONS % CAD $ 1,299,894 1 $ 1,299,894 1 $ 843,260 $ - $ 1,299,894 $ 843,260 $ 456,634 7407414 PROPERTY WAREHOUSE % CASES $ 195,967 1 $ 195,967 1 $ 165,369 $ - - $ - $ 195,967 $ 165,369 $ 30,598 7407415 FISCAL FTE $ 305 73.2 $ 22,326 75.2 $ 3,384 6 $ 1,830 6 $ 270 $ 24,156 $ 3,654 $ 20,502 7407419 TRAINING - RANGE SWORN FTE $ 1,475 62 $ 91,450 64 $ 97,664 6 $ 8,850 6 $ 9,156 $ 100,300 $ 106,820 $ (6,520) 7407419 TRAINING - IN SERVICE & EVOC CONTACT HRS. $ 172,845 1 $ 172,845 1 $ 67,244 $ - $ 172,845 $ 67,244 $ 105,601 7407421 JAIL ACCESS FEES - INTAKE EACH $ 751 41 $ 30,775 41 $ 30,775 $ - - $ - $ 30,775 $ 30,775 $ 0 7407421 JAIL ACCESS FEES - CLASSIFICATION EACH $ 123 54 $ 6,617 54 $ 6,617 $ - - $ - $ 6,617 $ 6,617 $ (0) 7407431 CENTRALIZED INVESTIGATIONS HOUR $ 170 941 $ 159,970 941 $ 123,271 $ - - $ - $ 159,970 $ 123,271 $ 36,699 7407450 TRAINING - PATROL SWORN FTE $ 188 56 $ 10,528 58 $ 13,572 6 $ 1,128 6 $ 1,404 $ 11,656 $ 14,976 $ (3,320) 7407456 ALARM ORDINACE PERMIT $ 218 510 $ 111,180 510 $ 72,420 $ - $ - $ 111,180 $ 72,420 $ 38,760 7407472 COURT LIAISON (SUBPOENAS) SUBPOEANA $ 8 3,072 $ 24,576 3,072 $ 43,008 $ - - $ - $ 24,576 $ 43,008 $ (18,432) 7407472 FIELD SERVICES (TECH SERVICES) FTE $ 6,208 73 $ 454,426 75 $ 417,375 6 $ 37,248 6 $ 33,390 $ 491,674 $ 450,765 $ 40,909 7407473 DEPARTMENT REPLACEMENTS FTE $ 321 73 $ 23,479 75 $ 23,224 6 $ 1,925 6 $ 1,858 $ 25,404 $ 25,082 $ 322 TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICE COSTS $ 2,861,879 $ 2,200,553 $ 52,121 $ 57,610 $ 2,913,999 $ 2,258,162 $ 655,837

SUPPORT SERVICE CREDITS
7407456 ALARM - PERMIT FEES PERMIT $ (50) 516.9 $ (25,845) 550 $ (25,845) 0 $ - 0 $ - $ (25,845) $ (25,845) $ - 7407456 ALARM - FALSE ALARM FEES ACTUAL $ (82,200) $ (82,200) 0 $ - $ - $ (82,200) $ (82,200) $ - TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICE CREDITS $ (108,045) $ (108,045) $ - $ - $ (108,045) $ (108,045) $ - TOTAL COST $ 2,753,834 $ 2,092,508 $ 52,121 $ 57,610 $ 2,805,954 $ 2,150,117 $ 655,837 Notes:

1. Regionalized Services included at no additional costs are as follows: Internal Affairs; Special Investigations Bureau; Narcotics/Gangs; Critical Incident Negotiating Team (CINT); Special Enforcement Detail (SED); Canine above and beyond RCPD exclusive program; Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT); Explosive Ordinance (EOD); Warrants Processing; Air Operations; Pre-employment/Fair Employment/ Employee Relations.

2. Starting FY21/22, the methodology for communications charges changed. Contract Cities are now charged based on the percentage share of actual prior year CAD events. The reason for this change was to ensure cost neutrality for the County as well as provide a more fair and accurate method of cost sharing. Prior years, the unit cost was based on radio count and contract cities were charged a per radio share of costs based on the number of radios issued to the contract.

SUPPORT SERVICE COSTS RCPD - MAIN RCPD - MEASURE H TOTALS & CHANGE

CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR

SUPPORT SERVICE COSTS
SERV PLAN RCPD CSU 23.24 Status Quo.xlsx Page 6 of 6 RCPD Alloc-Suprt-Crdt Summary ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Contract Law Enforcement Budget & Staffing Plan
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers
Item Proposed Budget Proposed Incr
(Decr)
Percent
Change Notes
Proposed
Budget
Total Personnel Costs 24,640,418 $939,885 3.97% 1 $23,700,533 Services & Supplies
Vehicles 1,381,264 42,405 3.17% 2 1,338,859
Other Services & Supplies 2,422,111 98,580 4.24% 2 2,323,531 Total Services & Supplies $ 3,803,375 $ 140,985 3.85% $ 3,662,390 Grants
Overtime 82,000 4 82,000
Service & Supplies -
Equipment -
Reimbursements (82,000) (82,000)
Total Grants $ - $ - $ -
Support Services, Allocated Services, & Credits $ 2,760,220 $ (0) 0.00% 3 $ 2,760,220 Total Ongoing Costs $ 31,204,013 $ 1,080,870 3.59% $ 30,123,143 Reimbursements
SRO Position (262,107) (10,081) 4.00% (252,026)
Building Share Costs (80,000) - (80,000)
Total Reimbursements $ (342,107) $ (10,081) 3.04% $ (332,026) $ - TOTAL SERVICE PLAN COSTS $ 30,861,906 $ 1,070,789 3.59% $ 29,791,117 Personnel Allocation Summary Auth Vacant Filled Auth Vacant Filled Auth Vacant Filled Sworn Positions
Captain 1 1 1 1
Lieutenant ~ Asst. Chief 1 1 1 1 2 2
Lieutenant 3 3 3 3
Sergeant 2 2 9 9 11 11
Deputy Sheriff 3 3 50 50 53 53
Total Sworn Positions 10 10 60 60 70 70
Total Sworn Positions Allocated to RCPD 6.0 6.0 60.0 60.0 66.0 66.0 Non-Sworn Positions
Sheriff's Record Officer II 2 2 2 2
Sheriff's Record Officer I 5 5 3 3 8 8
Community Services Officer II 4 1 3 4 1 3
Community Services Officer I 1 (1) 1 (1)
Senior Office Assistant (Confidential)
Total Non-Sworn Positions 7 7 7 5 14 12
Total Non-Sworn Positions Allocated to RCPD 4.2 4.2 7.0 2.0 5.0 11.2 2.0 9.2 Total Positions 17 17 67 2 65 84 2 82
Total Positions Allocated to RCPD 10.2 10.2 67.0 2.0 65.0 77.2 2.0 75.2 Vehicle Allocation
RCPD Shared
(60%)
RCPD Distinct
(100%)
FY 24/25
RCPD
Total
RCPD Shared
(60%)
RCPD
Distinct
(100%)
FY 23/24
RCPD
Total
Marked Motorcycles - Class 101 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Sedan (Parking Enforcement) - Class 110
Marked Patrol Cars - Class 122 3.0 28.0 31.0 3.0 28.0 31.0 Unmarked Cars - Class 124 4.0 11.0 15.0 4.0 11.0 15.0
1/2 Ton Truck - Class 132 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
3/4 Ton Truck - Class 135
3/4 Ton Truck 4X4 - Class 140 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Mini-Van (Equipment/CPS) - Class 150 1.0 2.0 3.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 Sport Utility - Class 154 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Vehicles 8.0 55.0 63.0 8.0 55.0 63.0
Total Vehicles Allocated to RCPD 4.8 55.0 59.8 4.8 55.0 59.8 Fiscal Year 2024/2025 Fiscal Year 2023/2024
FY 2024/2025
SHARED (60%) DISTINCT TOTAL
SERV PLAN RCPD 24.25 x2 Motor Officers Page 1 of 7 RCPD Budget & Staffing Plan ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Department
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Contract Law Enforcement Budget Detail
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers
Account
Nbr Account Name
FY 24/25
Proposed Budget FY 23/24 Budget
Final Budget
Incr (Decr) Over
Prior Year
Salaries & Benefits
10111000 Regular Employees 11,711,336 11,260,900 450,436 10112100 Salaries & Wages - Extra Help 253,055 243,322 9,733 10113200 Salaries & Wages - Time/One Half - Over Time 1,118,094 1,075,090 43,004 10114100 Salaries & Wages - Premium Pay 30,919 29,730 1,189 10114300 Allowances 82,320 82,320 -
10115100 Holiday In Lieu Pay 474,404 456,158 18,246
10121000 Retirement - Employer Cost 8,510,228 8,182,912 327,316 10121300 Retire Health Costs 50,180 50,180 -
10121400 401A Plan 10,006 9,621 385
10122000 Oasdhi - Employer Cost 932,398 896,539 35,859
10123000 Group Ins - Employer Cost 1,396,677 1,342,960 53,717 60654100 Personnel Svc 70,801 70,801 -
Total Salaries & Benefits 24,640,418 23,700,533 939,885 Services & Supplies
20200500 Advertising/Legal Notices 1,700 1,700 -
20202200 Books/Periodical Supply 600 600 -
20203500 Education & Training Service 45,950 45,950 -
20203800 Employee Recognition 2,900 2,900 -
20203805 Food Purchases/Services 1,500 1,500 -
20205200 Insurance Premiums 2,070,170 1,971,590 98,580
20206100 Membership Dues 800 800 -
20207600 Office Supplies 20,468 20,468 -
20208100 Postal Services 1,000 1,000 -
20208500 Printing Services 4,000 4,000 -
20219700 Telephone Service 2,200 2,200 -
20220500 Automotive Maintenance Service 4,000 4,000 -
20222600 Expendable Tools 2,050 2,050 -
20222700 Cell phone/Pager 58,541 58,541 -
20223200 Fire/Crash/Rescue Supplies 4,000 4,000 -
20226100 Office Equipment Maintenance Service 300 300 - 20226200 Office Equipment Maintenance Supplies 4,000 4,000 - 20227200 Radio/Electronic Maintenance Supplies 8,821 8,821 - 20227500 Rent/Leases Equipment 13,200 13,200 -
20229100 Other Equipment Maintenance Service 1,000 1,000 - 20229200 Other Equipment Maintenance Supplies 1,000 1,000 - 20231400 Clothing/Personal Supplies 11,386 11,386 -
20233200 Food/Catering Supplies 2,000 2,000 -
20235100 Laundry/Dry Cleaning Service 2,600 2,600 -
20244300 Medical Service 2,000 2,000 -
SERV PLAN RCPD 24.25 x2 Motor Officers Page 2 of 7 RCPD Budget Detail ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Department
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Contract Law Enforcement Budget Detail
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers
Account
Nbr Account Name
FY 24/25
Proposed Budget FY 23/24 Budget
Final Budget
Incr (Decr) Over
Prior Year
20244400 Laboratory (Medical) Supplies 12,000 12,000 -
20259100 Other Prof Serv 3,465 3,465 -
20281100 Data Processing Services 4,565 4,565 -
20281200 Data Processing Supplies 31,000 31,000 -
20286100 Unclassed Expense (Sheriff/Da) 1,100 1,100 -
20289800 Other Operating Expense - Supplies 35,711 35,711 - 20289900 Other Operating Expense - Services 6,000 6,000 - 20292100 GS Printing Services 2,000 2,000 -
20292200 GS Mail/Postage Charges 1,300 1,300 -
20292800 GS Equipment Rental - Light 1,102,552 1,060,147 42,405 20293800 GS Equipment Fuel - Light 278,712 278,712 -
20294000 Fuel Usage Voyager (Motor Units) 15,200 15,200 - 20298700 Gs Telephone Services - - -
20298900 Tele Instal 34,451 34,451 -
20291700 Alarm Serv 9,133 9,133 -
Total Services & Supplies 3,803,375 3,662,390 140,985
Grants
OTS Traffic
10113200 Salaries & Wages - Time/One Half - Over Time 82,000 82,000 - 20289800 Other Operating Expense - Supplies - - -
43430110 Equipment - - -
95956900 Rev - State Aid Other Misc. (82,000) (82,000) - Total Grants - - -
Intrafund Charges
60657100 Support Services 2,753,834 2,753,834 -
60657100 Cal-ID Cost Share 6,386 6,386
Total Intrafund Charges 2,760,220 2,760,220 -
Total Expenditures 31,204,013 30,123,143 1,080,870
SERV PLAN RCPD 24.25 x2 Motor Officers Page 3 of 7 RCPD Budget Detail ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Notes for Contract Law Enforcement Budget & Staffing Plan For Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers
Notes
1 Salary Costs
● Effective June 19, 2022, permanent employees who reach ten years of full-time service shall receive a 2.5% differential.
2 Other Services & Supplies
●20205200 - The budgeted insurance premium is calculated by County Risk Management and outside actuaries based on prior year loss experience. The amount budgeted for FY23/24 was $1,971,590 (WC $1,286,457 + Liability $685,133). FY24/25 projection assumes a 5% increase. 3 Support Services, Allocated Services & Credits
Units are based on a 3 year average of the 3 most recent fiscal years and the estimated current year end. All costs are based on FY21/22 actuals as that was the last complete fiscal year at time of budget preparation. These cost will stay static for the 2 year budget cycle [FY23/24 & FY24/25]. The increased Communications costs is due to and increase in overall Bureau costs as well as the expiration of one time revenue offsets. Rancho Cordova's percent of overall CAD events has also increased from 12.33% to 13.14% driving RCPD cost share higher.
4 OTS Grants
● The $82,000 received is now one grant OTS funding traffic (STEP) safety only. ● FY24/25 assumes max increases per labor agreements: LEMA ~ COLA 4% , DSA ~ COLA 4%, Non-Sworn ~ COLA 4% ● 20292800 & 20293800 - Assumes a 4% increase in cost with no vehicle additions.

SERV PLAN RCPD 24.25 x2 Motor Officers Page 4 of 7 Notes ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Contract Law Enforcement Budget - Annual Personnel Costs For Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Draft 1- Status Quo
10111000 10112100 10113200 10114100 10114300 10115100 10121000 10121100 10121200 10121300 10121400 10122000 10123000 60695102 60695103 60695600 Cost Center Fund Center Program Job Title PER
Position
Number Last Name First Name FTE
Regular
Employees Extra Help
Time One Half
OT Premium Pay Allowances Hol in Lieu Pay Retirement
1995/2003
POB Debt Svc
2004 POB
Debt Svc
Health SvgsER Cost 401A - Plan OASDHI Group InsBenefit Admin ACP
Empl Svcs
ACP
DPS Svc
Teams ACP
7407478000 Zz OverTime Zz OverTime 1,118,094 85,534 1,203,627 7407478000 Zz Extra Help ZZ On-Call 253,055 9,490 3,669 266,214 7407478000 7407478 Pal Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1038021 11260899.7 23700533 Sariah 1.0 150,914 1,200 6,237 80,261 19,796 10,157 650 12,118 23,309 168 575 174 305,560 7407478000 7407478 Admin Sheriff Lieutenant 1020687 243322 Carver Ian 1.0 223,960 7,424 - 8,869 136,176 33,589 17,232 650 2,402 11,010 23,325 168 575 174 465,554 7407478000 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 1022341 1075090 Day Jeremy 1.0 187,535 1,200 7,230 111,099 27,403 14,059 650 10,103 23,309 168 575 174 383,505 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sheriff Captain 1014600 29730 Luke Brandon 0.6 160,827 5,315 - 5,871 97,497 24,048 12,338 390 1,720 7,083 4,931 101 345 104 320,571 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sheriff Lieutenant 1017489 82320 Tamayo Matthew 0.6 145,779 4,817 - 5,322 88,374 21,798 11,183 390 1,559 6,808 13,995 101 345 104 300,576 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sheriff Records Officer 11029295 456158 Pelster Gayle 0.6 54,803 720 2,670 13,612 3,357 1,722 390 4,453 13,395 101 345 104 95,671 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sheriff Records Officer 11036810 8182912 Mooney Francis 0.6 53,402 720 2,670 12,506 3,085 1,583 390 4,346 13,986 101 345 104 93,237 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sheriff Records Officer 21024927 50180 Bell Glirea 0.6 76,119 720 3,070 18,689 4,609 2,365 390 6,114 8,580 101 345 104 121,207 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sheriff Sergeant 1020978 9621 Spurgeon James 0.6 107,263 720 4,338 63,680 15,707 8,058 390 6,140 13,986 101 345 104 220,832 7407478010 7407478 Admin Sr Office Assistant 1040956 896539 Rounds Carol 0.6 32,795 - - 7,219 1,780 913 390 2,510 6,021 101 345 104 52,178 7407478100 7407478 Hot Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1030736 1342959.56 Pendley Kayla 1.0 150,914 1,200 6,237 89,781 22,145 11,361 650 12,118 23,309 168 575 174 318,633 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1031612 70801.4932 Leonard Jay 1.0 165,200 1,200 6,237 87,498 21,582 11,072 650 13,211 23,309 168 575 174 330,876 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1031814 113956 Sacco Jaie 1.0 160,736 1,200 6,237 94,909 23,409 12,010 650 12,869 23,309 168 575 174 336,247 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1032872 116973 Thompson Nicholas 1.0 150,914 1,200 6,237 80,261 19,796 10,157 650 12,118 23,309 168 575 174 305,560 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1033446 109501 Saelee Gen 1.0 168,180 1,200 6,237 89,008 21,954 11,263 650 9,845 10,035 168 575 174 319,290 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1034013 118501 Bates Jonathan 1.0 157,462 1,200 6,237 83,578 20,615 10,576 650 12,618 10,035 168 575 174 303,888 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1034020 112592 Gordon Joseph 1.0 150,914 1,200 6,237 80,261 19,796 10,157 650 12,118 23,309 168 575 174 305,560 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035700 133695 Meza Samuel 1.0 150,914 1,200 6,237 80,261 19,796 10,157 650 12,118 23,309 168 575 174 305,560 7407478100 7407478 SRO Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035702 129132 Cervantes Veronica 1.0 144,368 1,200 6,237 76,944 18,979 9,736 650 11,617 10,035 168 575 174 280,683 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035738 106097 -252026 Eric 1.0 144,744 1,200 6,237 77,135 19,026 9,760 650 11,646 23,309 168 575 174 294,624 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035844 100519 Antonini Myles 1.0 166,427 1,200 6,237 88,120 21,735 11,151 650 13,304 23,309 168 575 174 333,050 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035887 107158 Bollinger Matthew L. 1.0 131,271 1,200 6,237 70,307 17,342 8,897 650 10,615 10,035 168 575 174 257,472 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035888 110222 Wihtol Brett 1.0 150,914 1,200 6,237 80,261 19,796 10,157 650 12,118 10,035 168 575 174 292,286 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035953 108909 Watts Marshal L. 1.0 144,368 1,200 6,237 76,944 18,979 9,736 650 11,617 23,309 168 575 174 293,958 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1036230 102767 Cortez Sabrina 1.0 137,819 1,200 6,237 73,626 18,160 9,316 650 11,117 23,309 168 575 174 282,351 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1036558 134414 Tran Alex 1.0 152,616 1,200 6,237 81,124 20,010 10,266 650 12,248 10,035 168 575 174 295,303 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1036656 134413 Barnes-King Stefiana 1.0 124,723 1,200 6,237 66,990 16,524 8,477 650 10,114 10,035 168 575 174 245,866 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1036964 134412 Trau Leslie 1.0 145,707 1,200 6,237 77,622 19,146 9,823 650 11,720 23,309 168 575 174 296,332 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037328 105176 Guerra Christopher 1.0 144,368 1,200 6,237 76,944 18,979 9,736 650 11,617 10,035 168 575 174 280,683 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037343 108294 Singh Parneet 1.0 152,616 1,200 6,237 81,124 20,010 10,266 650 12,248 10,035 168 575 174 295,303 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037344 121604 Smith Tyler 1.0 151,912 1,200 6,237 80,767 19,921 10,220 650 12,194 1,526 168 575 174 285,545 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037420 102392 Booth George 1.0 137,819 1,200 6,237 73,626 18,160 9,316 650 11,117 23,309 168 575 174 282,351 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037579 108527 Drake Evan 1.0 144,368 1,200 6,237 76,944 18,979 9,736 650 11,617 23,309 168 575 174 293,958 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037584 134488 Porterfield Nathan 1.0 144,368 1,200 6,237 76,944 18,979 9,736 650 11,617 23,309 168 575 174 293,958 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1038042 134495 Thompson Hunter 1.0 144,368 1,200 6,237 76,944 18,979 9,736 650 11,617 23,309 168 575 174 293,958 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1038145 124483 Gonzalez Lilia 1.0 144,368 1,200 6,237 76,944 18,979 9,736 650 11,617 23,309 168 575 174 293,958 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 1012069 106166 Rogers Michael 1.0 195,820 1,200 7,230 115,795 28,562 14,653 650 10,234 12,689 168 575 174 387,748 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 1013463 121605 McCue Thomas 1.0 195,820 1,200 7,230 115,795 28,562 14,653 650 10,234 22,325 168 575 174 397,384 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 1024699 134892 McCoy Michael 1.0 195,820 1,200 7,230 115,795 28,562 14,653 650 10,234 23,309 168 575 174 398,368 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 1031443 119602 DeCanio Aaron 1.0 192,464 1,200 7,230 113,372 27,964 14,346 650 10,234 23,309 168 575 174 391,686 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriffs Community Services Officer 2 1028151 133523 Weininger Jeremy 1.0 79,102 - 3,854 19,395 4,784 2,454 650 6,347 23,309 168 575 174 140,814 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriffs Community Services Officer 2 1038438 132458 Vogt Kimberly 1.0 81,124 - 3,854 18,703 4,613 2,367 650 6,501 10,035 168 575 174 128,765 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng A 1038774 135183 Cowan Joseph A 1.0 137,480 1,200 5,939 73,302 18,080 9,276 650 11,067 10,035 168 575 174 267,946 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng A 1039224 109440 Francis Olivia 1.0 137,480 1,200 5,939 73,302 18,080 9,276 650 11,067 10,035 168 575 174 267,946 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng A 1039555 122361 Hancock Michael 1.0 118,774 1,200 5,939 63,825 15,742 8,077 650 9,637 23,309 168 575 174 248,071 7407478110 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Lieutenant 1010870 101163 Fisher Steven 0.6 134,376 4,454 - 5,322 81,707 20,153 10,340 390 1,441 6,606 13,995 101 345 104 279,334 7407478110 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Lieutenant 1020984 122065 Merideth Richard 0.6 134,376 4,454 - 5,322 81,707 20,153 10,340 390 1,441 6,606 13,995 101 345 104 279,334 7407478110 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Lieutenant 1022283 125044 Daniels Michael 0.6 134,376 4,454 - 5,322 81,707 20,153 10,340 390 1,441 6,606 13,995 101 345 104 279,334 7407478121 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1037321 134529 Blackford Taylor 1.0 144,368 1,200 6,237 76,944 18,979 9,736 650 11,617 22,325 168 575 174 292,973 7407478202 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 1022362 134891 Steindorf Eric 1.0 187,535 1,200 7,230 111,099 27,403 14,059 650 10,103 1,526 168 575 174 361,721 7407478205 7407478 SRO Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035019 131552 Blackford Thomas 1.0 150,914 1,200 6,237 80,261 19,796 10,157 650 12,118 23,309 168 575 174 305,560 7407478300 7407478 Invest Deputy Sheriff Detective Tier 1 1002851 102654 Mulherin Justin 1.0 161,748 1,200 6,237 95,921 23,659 12,138 650 12,947 12,689 168 575 174 328,107 7407478300 7407478 Invest Deputy Sheriff Detective Tier 1 1030725 102493 Francis Mark 1.0 187,891 1,200 6,237 110,738 27,315 14,013 650 10,132 23,309 168 575 174 382,401 7407478300 7407478 Invest Deputy Sheriff Detective Tier 1 1034704 105810 Cacciato Russell 1.0 157,462 1,200 6,237 83,578 20,615 10,576 650 12,618 23,309 168 575 174 317,162 7407478300 7407478 Invest Deputy Sheriff Detective Tier 1 1036954 102275 Cleveringa Ryan 1.0 157,462 1,200 6,237 93,063 22,955 11,776 650 12,618 22,325 168 575 174 329,204 7407478300 7407478 Invest Sheriff Sergeant 1023266 128128 Vicory Dana 1.0 202,158 1,200 7,230 119,389 29,448 15,107 650 10,367 12,162 168 575 174 398,628 7407478410 7407478 POP Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1034803 126153 Stone Ha 0.6 90,548 720 3,742 48,156 11,878 6,093 390 7,271 6,021 101 345 104 175,369 7407478410 7407478 POP Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1035030 133513 Goold Jordan 0.6 82,691 720 3,742 44,175 10,896 5,590 390 6,670 13,986 101 345 104 169,410 7407478410 7407478 POP Sheriff Sergeant 1014292 102877 Garcia Ralph 0.6 117,493 720 4,338 69,479 17,137 8,792 390 6,140 13,986 101 345 104 239,026 7407478510 7407478 Crime Prev Sheriff Records Officer 11035674 135801 Chuong Brianna 0.6 53,514 720 2,421 12,477 3,077 1,579 390 4,337 6,021 101 345 104 85,086 7407478610 7407478 Crime Analy Sheriff Records Officer 11038718 136065 Sanchez Hernandez Monica 0.6 59,008 720 2,670 13,740 3,389 1,739 390 4,776 915 101 345 104 87,898 7407478610 7407478 Crime Analy Sheriff Records Officer 21004331 115050 Rodrigues Jeffrey 0.6 76,119 720 3,070 18,689 4,609 2,365 390 6,114 13,986 101 345 104 126,613 7407478700 7407478 PAL Sheriff Records Officer 11031617 131558 Aldama Tina 1.0 108,157 1,200 4,450 26,209 6,465 3,317 650 8,710 23,309 168 575 174 183,384 7407478701 7407478 Hot Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1034417 106702 Lopez Cameron 1.0 137,819 1,200 6,237 73,626 18,160 9,316 650 11,117 23,309 168 575 174 282,351 7407478702 7407478 CIT Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1036976 116981 Jackson Corey 1.0 145,707 1,200 6,237 77,622 19,146 9,823 650 11,720 10,035 168 575 174 283,058 7407478410 7407478 POP Deputy Sheriff Rng B 105948 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 0.6 90,548 720 3,742 48,156 11,878 6,093 390 7,271 6,021 101 345 104 175,369 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 116959 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 1.0 165,200 1,200 6,237 87,498 21,582 11,072 650 13,211 23,309 168 575 174 330,876 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 125033 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 1.0 165,200 1,200 6,237 87,498 21,582 11,072 650 13,211 23,309 168 575 174 330,876 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriff Sergeant 128338 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 1.0 195,820 1,200 7,230 115,795 28,562 14,653 650 10,234 23,310 168 575 174 398,369 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriffs Community Services Officer 2126191 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 1.0 79,102 - 3,854 19,395 4,784 2,454 650 6,347 23,309 168 575 174 140,814 7407478100 7407478 Patrol Sheriffs Community Services Officer 2129099 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 1.0 79,102 - 3,854 19,395 4,784 2,454 650 6,347 23,309 168 575 174 140,814 7407478701 7407478 Patrol Deputy Sheriff Rng B 114194 ***Vacant*** ***Vacant*** 1.0 118,774 1,200 - 60,815 15,000 7,696 650 9,182 16,278 168 575 174 230,513 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1033444 108012 Monahan Travis 1.0 144,368 1,200 6,237 76,944 18,979 9,736 650 11,617 10,035 168 575 174 280,683 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1033448 102394 Wycoff-Clark Brian 1.0 165,595 1,200 6,237 87,698 21,631 11,098 650 13,240 1,526 168 575 174 309,792 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1033453 105988 King Logan 1.0 157,462 1,200 6,237 83,578 20,615 10,576 650 12,618 23,309 168 575 174 317,162 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1033465 105595 Homen Steven 1.0 164,010 1,200 6,237 86,896 21,433 10,996 650 13,120 23,309 168 575 174 328,768 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1034028 124519 Meier Kevin 1.0 173,208 1,200 6,237 91,556 22,583 11,586 650 9,959 1,526 168 575 174 319,421 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1034791 106749 Firman Jonathan 1.0 157,462 1,200 6,237 83,578 20,615 10,576 650 12,618 10,035 168 575 174 303,888 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B 1036551 134415 Gadd Brian 1.0 138,802 1,200 6,237 74,123 18,283 9,380 650 11,191 10,035 168 575 174 270,818 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Sheriff Records Officer 11035490 135209 Nefedov Aleksey 1.0 89,003 1,200 4,450 20,845 5,142 2,637 650 7,245 22,325 168 575 174 154,414 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Sheriff Records Officer 11038661 134929 Kanuha Loren 1.0 93,675 1,200 4,450 22,876 5,642 2,894 650 7,602 23,309 168 575 174 163,216 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Sheriff Sergeant 1016385 135168 Barry Sean 1.0 204,108 1,200 7,230 120,493 29,720 15,247 650 10,367 23,309 168 575 174 413,242 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B New New New New 1.0 158,258 1,200 7,913 94,893 23,405 12,008 650 12,808 23,309 168 575 174 335,361 7407478900 7407478 Traffic Deputy Sheriff Rng B New New New New 1.0 158,258 1,200 7,913 94,893 23,405 12,008 650 12,805 23,309 168 575 174 335,358 Grant Total 77.2 11,711,336 253,055 1,118,094 30,919 82,320 474,404 6,199,968 1,526,911 783,349 50,180 10,006 932,398 1,396,677 12,974 44,395 13,432 24,640,418 Grand Total

ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Annual Vehicle Costs
For Fiscal Year 2024/2025
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers
Cost Center Vehicle Type Vehicle Description Vehicle #
Veh
Count
RC
Share Fixed Costs
Rate per
Mile
Estimated
Mileage
Total
Variable
One Time
Purchase and
Build-Out Total Cost
7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101002 1 1 11,414 - - - 11,414 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101003 1 1 11,414 - - - 11,414 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101004 1 1 11,414 - - - 11,414 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101300 1 1 11,414 - - - 11,414 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101001 1 1 11,414 - - - 11,414 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101500 1 1 11,414 - - - 11,414 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101501 1 1 11,414 - - - 11,414 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101502 1 1 11,414 - - - 11,414 7407478900 101 Motorcycle 101503 1 1 11,414 - - - 11,414 101 Total 9 9 102,726 - 102,726
7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122012 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122016 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122023 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122108 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122121 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478702 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122122 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122124 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478121 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122131 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122139 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122147 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122212 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122213 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122243 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122352 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122354 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122355 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122552 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122704 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122728 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122758 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122767 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122768 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122787 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122829 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478122 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122833 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122925 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122829 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 7407478100 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122925 1 1 26,974 0.28 24,000 6,720 33,694 122 Total 28 28 755,285 188,160 943,445
7407478000 124 Undercover 124023 1 1 8,599 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,799 7407478300 124 Undercover 124035 1 1 8,599 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,799 7407478000 124 Undercover 124029 1 1 8,599 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,799 7407478300 124 Undercover 124360 1 1 8,599 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,799 7407478100 124 Undercover 124506 1 1 8,599 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,799 7407478000 124 Undercover 124508 1 1 8,599 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,799 7407478202 124 Undercover 124524 1 1 8,599 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,799 7407478000 124 Undercover 124742 1 1 8,599 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,799 7407478300 124 Undercover 124776 1 1 8,599 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,799 7407478000 124 Undercover 124871 1 1 8,599 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,799 7407478300 124 Undercover 124945 1 1 8,599 0.28 15,000 4,200 12,799 124 Total 11 11 94,586 46,200 - 140,786
7407478100 132 1/2 Ton Pickup 132311 1 1 7,451 0.28 10,000 2,800 10,251 132 Total 1 1 7,451 2,800 10,251
7407478900 154 SUV 154-006 1 1 14,181 0.28 6,000 1,680 15,861 7407478700 154 SUV 154-520 1 1 14,181 0.28 6,000 1,680 15,861 7407478400 154 SUV 154-910 1 1 14,181 0.28 6,000 1,680 15,861 154 Total 3 3 42,544 5,040 47,584
7407478702 140 3/4 Ton Truck 4x4 140810 1 1 10,268 0.28 20,000 5,600 15,868 140 Total 1 1 10,268 5,600 15,868
7407478500 150 mini van 150406 1 1 7,885 0.28 12,000 3,360 11,245 7407478700 150 mini van 150118 1 1 7,885 0.28 12,000 3,360 11,245 150 Total 2 2 15,771 6,720 22,491
7407478000 TOTAL 55 55 1,028,630 254,520 1,283,150
7407478110 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122347 1 0.6 16,185 0.28 24,000 4,032 20,217 7407478110 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122348 1 0.6 16,185 0.28 24,000 4,032 20,217 7407478110 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122349 1 0.6 16,185 0.28 24,000 4,032 20,217 122 Total 3 1.8 48,554 12,096 60,650
7407478010 124 Undercover 124116 1 0.6 5,159 0.28 15,000 2,520 7,679 7407478010 124 Undercover 124127 1 0.6 5,159 0.28 15,000 2,520 7,679 7407478010 124 Undercover 124588 1 0.6 5,159 0.28 15,000 2,520 7,679 7407478410 124 Undercover 124875 1 0.6 5,159 0.28 15,000 2,520 7,679 124 Total 4 2.4 20,637 10,080 30,717
7407478010 150 Mini-Van 150942 1 0.6 4,731 0.28 12,000 2,016 6,747 150 Total 1 0.6 4,731 2,016 6,747
7407478010 TOTAL 8 4.8 73,922 24,192 98,114
TOTAL 63 59.8 1,102,552 278,712 - 1,381,264

VARIABLE COST
Pge 6 of 7
ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Law Enforcement Services Support Costs
FY 21/22 Actuals for Use in FY 24/25
Draft- 2 Additional Motor Officers

CURRENT

YEAR PRIOR YEAR
FUND

CENTER DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
GRAND
TOTAL
GRAND

TOTAL CHANGE
7407401 DEPT WIDE UNDISTRIBUTED COSTS FTE $ 190 73.2 $ 13,908 75.2 $ 144,534 6 $ 1,140 6 $ 11,532 $ 15,048 $ 156,066 $ (141,018) 7407405 HUMAN RESOURCES FTE $ 488 73.2 $ 35,722 75.2 $ 21,206 $ - - $ - $ 35,722 $ 21,206 $ 14,516 7407411 RECORDS - REPORTS REPORT $ 27.68 4,014 $ 111,126 3,670 $ 71,808 $ - - $ - $ 111,126 $ 71,808 $ 39,318 7407411 RECORDS - CITATIONS CITATION $ 27 129 $ 3,516 170 $ 3,275 $ - - $ - $ 3,516 $ 3,275 $ 241 7407412 CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION (CSI) HOUR $ 100 932 $ 93,200 731 $ 51,901 $ - - $ - $ 93,200 $ 51,901 $ 41,299 7407412 CSI PHOTOS EACH $ 15 25 $ 375 43 $ 645 $ - - $ - $ 375 $ 645 $ (270) 7407413 COMMUNICATIONS % CAD $ 1,299,894 1 $ 1,299,894 1 $ 843,260 $ - $ 1,299,894 $ 843,260 $ 456,634 7407414 PROPERTY WAREHOUSE % CASES $ 195,967 1 $ 195,967 1 $ 165,369 $ - - $ - $ 195,967 $ 165,369 $ 30,598 7407415 FISCAL FTE $ 305 73.2 $ 22,326 75.2 $ 3,384 6 $ 1,830 6 $ 270 $ 24,156 $ 3,654 $ 20,502 7407419 TRAINING - RANGE SWORN FTE $ 1,475 62 $ 91,450 64 $ 97,664 6 $ 8,850 6 $ 9,156 $ 100,300 $ 106,820 $ (6,520) 7407419 TRAINING - IN SERVICE & EVOC CONTACT HRS. $ 172,845 1 $ 172,845 1 $ 67,244 $ - $ 172,845 $ 67,244 $ 105,601 7407421 JAIL ACCESS FEES - INTAKE EACH $ 751 41 $ 30,775 41 $ 30,775 $ - - $ - $ 30,775 $ 30,775 $ 0 7407421 JAIL ACCESS FEES - CLASSIFICATION EACH $ 123 54 $ 6,617 54 $ 6,617 $ - - $ - $ 6,617 $ 6,617 $ (0) 7407431 CENTRALIZED INVESTIGATIONS HOUR $ 170 941 $ 159,970 941 $ 123,271 $ - - $ - $ 159,970 $ 123,271 $ 36,699 7407450 TRAINING - PATROL SWORN FTE $ 188 56 $ 10,528 58 $ 13,572 6 $ 1,128 6 $ 1,404 $ 11,656 $ 14,976 $ (3,320) 7407456 ALARM ORDINACE PERMIT $ 218 510 $ 111,180 510 $ 72,420 $ - $ - $ 111,180 $ 72,420 $ 38,760 7407472 COURT LIAISON (SUBPOENAS) SUBPOEANA $ 8 3,072 $ 24,576 3,072 $ 43,008 $ - - $ - $ 24,576 $ 43,008 $ (18,432) 7407472 FIELD SERVICES (TECH SERVICES) FTE $ 6,208 73 $ 454,426 75 $ 417,375 6 $ 37,248 6 $ 33,390 $ 491,674 $ 450,765 $ 40,909 7407473 DEPARTMENT REPLACEMENTS FTE $ 321 73 $ 23,479 75 $ 23,224 6 $ 1,925 6 $ 1,858 $ 25,404 $ 25,082 $ 322 TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICE COSTS $ 2,861,879 $ 2,200,553 $ 52,121 $ 57,610 $ 2,913,999 $ 2,258,162 $ 655,837

SUPPORT SERVICE CREDITS
7407456 ALARM - PERMIT FEES PERMIT $ (50) 516.9 $ (25,845) 550 $ (25,845) 0 $ - 0 $ - $ (25,845) $ (25,845) $ - 7407456 ALARM - FALSE ALARM FEES ACTUAL $ (82,200) $ (82,200) 0 $ - $ - $ (82,200) $ (82,200) $ - TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICE CREDITS $ (108,045) $ (108,045) $ - $ - $ (108,045) $ (108,045) $ - TOTAL COST $ 2,753,834 $ 2,092,508 $ 52,121 $ 57,610 $ 2,805,954 $ 2,150,117 $ 655,837 Notes:

SUPPORT SERVICE COSTS

1. Regionalized Services included at no additional costs are as follows: Internal Affairs; Special Investigations Bureau; Narcotics/Gangs; Critical Incident Negotiating Team (CINT); Special Enforcement Detail (SED); Canine above and beyond RCPD exclusive program; Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT); Explosive Ordinance (EOD); Warrants Processing; Air Operations; Pre-employment/Fair Employment/ Employee Relations.

2. Starting FY21/22, the methodology for communications charges changed. Contract Cities are now charged based on the percentage share of actual prior year CAD events. The reason for this change was to ensure cost neutrality for the County as well as provide a more fair and accurate method of cost sharing. Prior years, the unit cost was based on radio count and contract cities were charged a per radio share of costs based on the number of radios issued to the contract.

SUPPORT SERVICE COSTS RCPD - MAIN RCPD - MEASURE H TOTALS & CHANGE

CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR
SERV PLAN RCPD 24.25 x2 Motor Officers Page 7 of 7 Alloc-Costs ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Measure H Crime Suppression Budget
Fiscal Year 2024/2025
1st Draft- Status Quo
Item Proposed Budget Proposed Incr
(Decr)
Percent
Change Notes
Adopted
Budget
Total Personnel Costs $1,772,552 $67,629 3.97% 1 $ 1,704,923 Services & Supplies
Vehicles 67,869 2,555 3.91% 65,314
Other Services & Supplies 173,936 7,826 4.71% 166,110
Total Services & Supplies $ 241,804 $ 10,380 4.49% $ 231,424 Support Services, Allocated Services, & Credits $ 52,121 $ (0) 0.00% $ 52,121 Total Ongoing Costs $ 2,066,477 $ 78,009 3.92% $ 1,988,468 Reimbursements
SRO Position
Total Reimbursements $ - $ - $ -
TOTAL SERVICE PLAN COSTS $ 2,066,477 $ 78,009 3.92% $ 1,988,468 Personnel Allocation Summary Auth Vacant Filled Auth Vacant Filled Sworn Positions
Deputy Sheriff 6 6 6 6
Total Sworn Positions 6 6 6 6
Total Sworn Positions Allocated to RCPD 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Total Positions 6 6 6 6
Total Positions Allocated to RCPD 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Vehicle Allocation FY 2024/2025 FY 2023/2024
Marked Patrol Cars - Class 122 2.0 2.0
Total Vehicles 2.0 2.0
Total Vehicles Allocated to RCPD 2.0 2.0
FY 2024/2025 FY 2023/2024
FY 2024/2025 FY 2023/2024
SERV PLAN RCPD CSU 24.25 Status Quo.xlsx Page 1 of 6 RCPD Budget & Staffing Plan ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Measure H Crime Suppression Budget - Notes
Fiscal Year 2024/2025
1st Draft- Status Quo
Notes
1 ● Effective June 19, 2022, permanent employees who reach ten years of full-time service shall receive a 2.5% differential. 2 Other Services & Supplies
● 20292800 & 20293800 - Assumes a 4% increase in cost with no vehicle additions. 3 Support Services, Allocated Services & Credits
● FY24/25 assumes increases per labor agreements: LEMA ~ COLA 4% , DSA ~ COLA 4% Non-Sworn ~ COLA 4% ●20205200 - The budgeted insurance premium is calculated by County Risk Management and outside actuaries based on prior year loss experience.

The amount budgeted for FY22/23 was $156,510 (WC $102,643 + Liability $53,867). FY24/25 projection assumes a 5% increase Units are based on a 3 year average of the 3 most recent fiscal years and the estimated current year end. All costs are based on FY21/22 actuals as that was the last complete fiscal year at time of budget preparation. These cost will stay static for the 2 year budget cycle [FY23/24 & FY24/25].

SERV PLAN RCPD CSU 24.25 Status Quo.xlsx Page 2 of 6 Notes ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Measure H Crime Suppression Budget - Detail
Fiscal Year 2024/2025
1st Draft- Status Quo
Account
Nbr Account Name
FY 24/25
Proposed
Budget
FY 23/24 Budget
Final Budget
Incr (Decr) Over
Prior Year
Salaries & Benefits
10111000 Regular Employees 867,931 834,545 33,386
10113200 Salaries & Wages - Time/One Half - Overtime 29,921 28,770 1,151 10114300 Allowances 7,200 7,200 -
10115100 Holiday In Lieu Pay 37,421 35,982 1,439
10121000 Retirement - Employer Cost 635,152 610,723 24,429 10121300 Retire Health Costs 3,900 3,900 -
10122000 Oasdhi - Employer Cost 72,216 69,351 2,866
10123000 Group Ins - Employer Cost 113,307 108,949 4,358 60654100 Personnel Svc 5,503 5,503 -
Total Salaries & Benefits 1,772,552 1,704,923 67,629
Services & Supplies
20203500 Education & Training Service 1,500 1,500 -
20205200 Insurance Premiums 164,336 156,510 7,826
20207600 Office Supplies 800 800 -
20219700 Telephone Service 2,800 2,800 -
20222700 Cell phone/Pager 4,500 4,500 -
20233200 Food/Catering Supplies - - -
20244300 Medical Service - - -
20292800 GS Equipment Rental - Light 53,949 51,874 2,075 20293800 GS Equipment Fuel - Light 13,920 13,440 480
Total Services & Supplies 241,804 231,424 10,380
Intrafund Charges
60657100 Support Services 52,121 52,121 (0)
Total Intrafund Charges 52,121 52,121 (0)
Total Expenditures 2,066,477 1,988,468 78,009
SERV PLAN RCPD CSU 24.25 Status Quo.xlsx Page 3 of 6 RCPD Budget Detail ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Measure H Crime Suppression Budget - Annual Personnel Costs Fiscal Year 2024/2025
1st Draft- Status Quo
10111000 101132000 10114300 10115100 10121000 10121100 10121200 10121300 10122000 10123000 60695102 60695103 60695105 Fund Center Job Title Last Name First Name Function FTE Position
Number Cost Center
Regular
Employees
Time/One
Half OT Allowances
Hol in Lieu
Pay Retirement
1995/2003
POB Debt
Svc
2004 POB
Debt Svc
Health SvgsER Cost OASDHI Group InsBenefit
Admin ACP
Empl Svcs
ACP
DPS Svc
Teams ACP
7407478 Deputy Sheriff Daniel Nathan CSU 1 106717 7407478200 150,919 1,200 6,237 80,261 19,796 10,157 650 12,118 23,309 168 575 174 305,564 7407478 Deputy Sheriff Kurtz Austin CSU 1 100669 7407478200 150,914 1,200 6,237 80,261 19,796 10,157 650 12,118 23,309 168 575 174 305,560 7407478 Deputy Sheriff Farrar Lucas CSU 1 103306 7407478200 159,190 1,200 6,237 84,454 20,831 10,687 650 12,751 10,035 168 575 174 306,953 7407478 Deputy Sheriff Garrison Jaycob CSU 1 133509 7407478200 137,819 1,200 6,237 73,626 18,160 9,316 650 11,117 10,035 168 575 174 269,077 7407478 Deputy Sheriff Kimbrell Jason FOZ/POP 1 110954 7407478205 131,271 1,200 6,237 70,307 17,342 8,897 650 10,615 23,309 168 575 174 270,746 7407478 Deputy Sheriff Womack Adam Youth 1 101373 7407478210 137,819 1,200 6,237 73,626 18,160 9,316 650 11,117 23,309 168 575 174 282,351 29,921 2,380 32,301
Grand Total 6 $ 867,931 $ 29,921 $ 7,200 $ 37,421 $ 462,535 $ 114,087 $ 58,530 $ 3,900 $ 72,216 $ 113,307 $ 1,008 $ 3,450 $ 1,044 $ 1,772,552 Grand Total
SERV PLAN RCPD CSU 24.25 Status Quo.xlsx Page 4 of 6 CSU PERSONNEL ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Rancho Cordova Police Department
Measure H Crime Suppression Budget - Annual Vehicle Costs Fiscal Year 2024/2025
1st Draft- Status Quo
Cost Center Vehicle Type Vehicle Description Vehicle #
Veh
Count
RC
Share
One Time
Purchase and
Build-out Fixed Costs
Rate per
Mile
Estimated
Mileage
Total
Variable Total Cost
7407478200 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122600 1 1 26,974 0.29 24,000 6,960 33,934 7407478200 122 Sheriff's Patrol Car 122602 1 1 26,974 0.29 24,000 6,960 33,934 122 Total 2 2 - 53,949 13,920 67,869
TOTAL 2 2 - 53,949 13,920 67,869

VARIABLE COST
SERV PLAN RCPD CSU 24.25 Status Quo.xlsx Page 5 of 6 VEHICLES ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

Sacramento County Sheriff's Office
Law Enforcement Services Support Costs
FY 21/22 Actuals for Use in FY 24/25

CURRENT

YEAR PRIOR YEAR
FUND

CENTER DESCRIPTION UNIT UNIT COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
# OF

UNITS TOTAL COST
GRAND
TOTAL
GRAND

TOTAL CHANGE
7407401 DEPT WIDE UNDISTRIBUTED COSTS FTE $ 190 73.2 $ 13,908 75.2 $ 144,534 6 $ 1,140 6 $ 11,532 $ 15,048 $ 156,066 $ (141,018) 7407405 HUMAN RESOURCES FTE $ 488 73.2 $ 35,722 75.2 $ 21,206 $ - - $ - $ 35,722 $ 21,206 $ 14,516 7407411 RECORDS - REPORTS REPORT $ 27.68 4,014 $ 111,126 3,670 $ 71,808 $ - - $ - $ 111,126 $ 71,808 $ 39,318 7407411 RECORDS - CITATIONS CITATION $ 27 129 $ 3,516 170 $ 3,275 $ - - $ - $ 3,516 $ 3,275 $ 241 7407412 CRIME SCENE INVESTIGATION (CSI) HOUR $ 100 932 $ 93,200 731 $ 51,901 $ - - $ - $ 93,200 $ 51,901 $ 41,299 7407412 CSI PHOTOS EACH $ 15 25 $ 375 43 $ 645 $ - - $ - $ 375 $ 645 $ (270) 7407413 COMMUNICATIONS % CAD $ 1,299,894 1 $ 1,299,894 1 $ 843,260 $ - $ 1,299,894 $ 843,260 $ 456,634 7407414 PROPERTY WAREHOUSE % CASES $ 195,967 1 $ 195,967 1 $ 165,369 $ - - $ - $ 195,967 $ 165,369 $ 30,598 7407415 FISCAL FTE $ 305 73.2 $ 22,326 75.2 $ 3,384 6 $ 1,830 6 $ 270 $ 24,156 $ 3,654 $ 20,502 7407419 TRAINING - RANGE SWORN FTE $ 1,475 62 $ 91,450 64 $ 97,664 6 $ 8,850 6 $ 9,156 $ 100,300 $ 106,820 $ (6,520) 7407419 TRAINING - IN SERVICE & EVOC CONTACT HRS. $ 172,845 1 $ 172,845 1 $ 67,244 $ - $ 172,845 $ 67,244 $ 105,601 7407421 JAIL ACCESS FEES - INTAKE EACH $ 751 41 $ 30,775 41 $ 30,775 $ - - $ - $ 30,775 $ 30,775 $ 0 7407421 JAIL ACCESS FEES - CLASSIFICATION EACH $ 123 54 $ 6,617 54 $ 6,617 $ - - $ - $ 6,617 $ 6,617 $ (0) 7407431 CENTRALIZED INVESTIGATIONS HOUR $ 170 941 $ 159,970 941 $ 123,271 $ - - $ - $ 159,970 $ 123,271 $ 36,699 7407450 TRAINING - PATROL SWORN FTE $ 188 56 $ 10,528 58 $ 13,572 6 $ 1,128 6 $ 1,404 $ 11,656 $ 14,976 $ (3,320) 7407456 ALARM ORDINACE PERMIT $ 218 510 $ 111,180 510 $ 72,420 $ - $ - $ 111,180 $ 72,420 $ 38,760 7407472 COURT LIAISON (SUBPOENAS) SUBPOEANA $ 8 3,072 $ 24,576 3,072 $ 43,008 $ - - $ - $ 24,576 $ 43,008 $ (18,432) 7407472 FIELD SERVICES (TECH SERVICES) FTE $ 6,208 73 $ 454,426 75 $ 417,375 6 $ 37,248 6 $ 33,390 $ 491,674 $ 450,765 $ 40,909 7407473 DEPARTMENT REPLACEMENTS FTE $ 321 73 $ 23,479 75 $ 23,224 6 $ 1,925 6 $ 1,858 $ 25,404 $ 25,082 $ 322 TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICE COSTS $ 2,861,879 $ 2,200,553 $ 52,121 $ 57,610 $ 2,913,999 $ 2,258,162 $ 655,837

SUPPORT SERVICE CREDITS
7407456 ALARM - PERMIT FEES PERMIT $ (50) 516.9 $ (25,845) 550 $ (25,845) 0 $ - 0 $ - $ (25,845) $ (25,845) $ - 7407456 ALARM - FALSE ALARM FEES ACTUAL $ (82,200) $ (82,200) 0 $ - $ - $ (82,200) $ (82,200) $ - TOTAL SUPPORT SERVICE CREDITS $ (108,045) $ (108,045) $ - $ - $ (108,045) $ (108,045) $ - TOTAL COST $ 2,753,834 $ 2,092,508 $ 52,121 $ 57,610 $ 2,805,954 $ 2,150,117 $ 655,837 Notes:

1. Regionalized Services included at no additional costs are as follows: Internal Affairs; Special Investigations Bureau; Narcotics/Gangs; Critical Incident Negotiating Team (CINT); Special Enforcement Detail (SED); Canine above and beyond RCPD exclusive program; Hazardous Materials (HAZMAT); Explosive Ordinance (EOD); Warrants Processing; Air Operations; Pre-employment/Fair Employment/ Employee Relations.

2. Starting FY21/22, the methodology for communications charges changed. Contract Cities are now charged based on the percentage share of actual prior year CAD events. The reason for this change was to ensure cost neutrality for the County as well as provide a more fair and accurate method of cost sharing. Prior years, the unit cost was based on radio count and contract cities were charged a per radio share of costs based on the number of radios issued to the contract.

SUPPORT SERVICE COSTS RCPD - MAIN RCPD - MEASURE H TOTALS & CHANGE

CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR

SUPPORT SERVICE COSTS
SERV PLAN RCPD CSU 24.25 Status Quo.xlsx Page 6 of 6 RCPD Alloc-Suprt-Crdt Summary ITEM 16.11. ATTACHMENT 3

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 16.12.

DATE: June 5, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Albert Stricker, Public Works Director
Quoc Nham, Senior Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF THE RANCH PHASE 2 SUBDIVISION NO. FM-2021-002-04, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SUBDIVISION
IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT CONTRACT NO. 2022-230 WITH K.

HOVNANIAN AT JAEGER RANCH, LLC

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the City to enter into Subdivision Improvement Agreement Contract No. 2022-230 (Attachment 2) guaranteeing the construction of public roads and utilities with K. Hovnanian at Jaeger Ranch, LLC, and the recording of the final subdivision map creating 11 future development lots and six (6) miscellaneous lots located east of Rancho Cordova Parkway and on the north and south side of Chrysanthy Boulevard.

BACKGROUND
The map has been examined and checked for compliance with Title 22 of the City of Rancho Cordova Municipal code and the California Subdivision Map Act. The City Council approved the Large Lot Tentative Map on June 6, 2020. A Development Agreement by the City and K.

Hovnanian at Jaeger Rancho, LLC was entered into on February 21, 2020, and recorded on May 1, 2020, in the Official Records of Sacramento County on Document No. 202005010617. A copy of the final map (Attachment 3) and a copy of the vicinity map (Attachment 4) are included with this letter.

REY Engineers, Inc. has waived the requirement for a bond to guarantee payment for setting the survey monuments with the subdivision. The soil report requirement has been satisfied by Wallace Kuhl & Associates, dated January 12, 2019.

There are no delinquent taxes against the property and the Tax Collector has so certified. The 2022/2023 estimated taxes have been secured with the Sacramento County Tax Collector.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
There is no fiscal impact to the City.

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement No. 2022-230

3. Final Map

4. Vicinity Map

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 1

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE LARGE LOT FINAL MAP OF THE RANCH PHASE 2, SUBDIVISION NO. FM-2021-002-04, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT CONTRACT NO. 2022-230 WITH K. HOVNANIAN AT JAEGER RANCH, LLC
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Large Lot Tentative Map on June 6, 2020, per Resolution No. 5-2020; and
WHEREAS, the map is in substantial compliance with the approved tentative map; and WHEREAS, the conditions of approval have been complied with; and WHEREAS, the map complies with Title 22 of the City of Rancho Cordova Municipal Code and the California Subdivision Map Act; and
WHEREAS, the approval of final maps is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Regulation section 15268(b)(3) as a ministerial approval; and
WHEREAS, the City desires to enter into a subdivision improvement agreement with the developer to ensure necessary public improvements are completed and secured with a bond.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA does approve the Large Lot Final Map of The Ranch Phase 2, Subdivision No. FM-2021-002-04 and does authorize the City Manager to execute Subdivision Improvement Agreement No. 2022-230 with K. Hovnanian at Jaeger Ranch, LLC, in a form approved by the City Attorney.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on the 5th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:

Linda Budge, Mayor
Stacy Leitner, CMC
City Clerk

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 2

CONTRACT NO. 2022-230
Subdivision Improvement Agreement Updated: 10/26/21
Between the City of Rancho Cordova and
K. Hovnanian at Jaeger Ranch, LLC 1

SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
Large Lot Final Map of The Ranch – Phase 2 Subdivision No. FM-2021-002-04 THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (hereinafter, “Agreement”) entered into this 6th day of June 2023, by and between the City of Rancho Cordova, (hereinafter “City"), a California municipal corporation, and K. Hovnanian at Jaeger Ranch, LLC, a California limited liability company (hereinafter "Principal").

RECITALS
WHEREAS, Section 66462 of the Government Code provides that if the work of improvement required therein is not completed prior to the acceptance of a final subdivision map, the owner of the subdivision may enter into an agreement with the City upon mutually agreeable terms to thereafter complete the improvements at the owner’s expense in consideration of the acceptance of said final subdivision map by the City; and WHEREAS, Section 66499 of the Government Code requires that said work is to be secured by a surety bond or by an instrument of credit issued by a financial institution subject to regulation by the State or federal governments, or by a cash deposit, or by other means; and WHEREAS, City and Principal desire to enter into an improvement agreement as permitted by the Subdivision Map Act under the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, with respect to that certain Large Lot Final Map (“LL Final Map”) in connection with that project known as Large Lot Final Map of The Ranch – Phase 2 (“Project”).

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, conditions and covenants hereinafter set forth, City and Principal agree as follows:

1. Incorporation of Recitals. The foregoing recitals are hereby incorporated by reference.

2. Findings and Conditions of Subdivision Map. Principal recognizes that approval of its LL Final Map is subject to the findings and conditions attached to such approval and hereby acknowledges and agrees to be bound by such findings and conditions.

3. City Approval of Subdivision Map. The city agrees to accept on behalf of the public all lands, rights of way and easements therein offered in dedication in the LL Final Map, in accordance with the conditions hereinafter set forth.

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 2

CONTRACT NO. 2022-230
Subdivision Improvement Agreement Updated: 10/26/21
Between the City of Rancho Cordova and
K. Hovnanian at Jaeger Ranch, LLC 2

4. Completion of Improvements. When required for development of the Project, Principal, or assignee, agrees to complete the work of improvement included within the LL Final Map in accordance with the requirements of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code and such standard specifications created by applicable City ordinances or resolutions which are in effect at the time of the installation of said improvements. Principal, or assignee, further agrees to complete any improvements included within and identified on the LL Final Map consistent with the terms and also identified in subsequent subdivision improvement agreements (“SIAs”) to be executed by the City and Principal, or assignee, following the approval and recordation of small lot final maps (“SLFMs”) for the Project, as applicable, and any other improvements as may be reasonably required by the City. The improvements shall be constructed under infrastructure improvement plans to be approved by the City.

5. Restriction on Further Development. A SLFM shall not be recorded, and a building permit shall not be issued, until: (i) all onsite and offsite public utilities and roadway and frontage improvements are installed to serve the parcels subject to or depicted on such SLFM in accordance with the requirements of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code and such standard specifications created by applicable City ordinances or resolutions which are in effect at the time of the installation of said improvements; or (ii) an appropriate surety bond, instrument of credit, or cash deposit satisfactory to the City is submitted and accepted by the City for said onsite and offsite public utilities and improvements. The LL Final Map shall include the following note:

A small lot final map (“SLFM”) shall not be recorded, or development of a large lot identified herein shall not proceed other than pursuant to approved infrastructure improvement plans, or a building permit shall not be issued, unless: (i) all offsite and onsite public utilities and roadway and frontage improvements are installed to serve the parcels subject to or depicted on such SLFM in accordance with the requirements of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code and such standard specifications created by applicable City ordinances or resolutions which are in effect at the time of the installation of said improvements; or (ii) an appropriate surety bond, instrument of credit, or cash deposit satisfactory to the City is submitted and accepted by the City for said offsite and onsite public utilities and improvements.

Principal shall ensure that any subsequent purchasers, buyers, or developers of any parcels, of any part of the LL Final Map (but specifically excluding any members of the homebuying public), shall acknowledge and agree to be bound to, in writing, the above-referenced note in this

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 2

CONTRACT NO. 2022-230
Subdivision Improvement Agreement Updated: 10/26/21
Between the City of Rancho Cordova and
K. Hovnanian at Jaeger Ranch, LLC 3
paragraph and this Agreement.

6. Payment For Services. Principal agrees to promptly pay, when due, all costs for plan checking, inspection services and material testing performed by City pursuant to the requirements of Sections 12.03.210 et. seq. of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code.

7. Correction of Defects. Principal, or its assignee, agrees to remedy any defects in the improvements that are the subject of the applicable subsequent SIA for a SLFM and arising from faulty or defective construction of said improvements occurring within twelve (12) months after acceptance thereof by City.

8. Indemnity. Principal shall indemnify and hold harmless City from any and all loss, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from Principal’s performance or nonperformance of his duties and obligations under this Agreement, or from the negligent act or omission of himself, his agents, servants and employees, excluding, however, any such loss, damage or liability arising from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers or employees. Principal shall, at his own cost and expense, defend any and all actions, suits, or legal proceedings arising out of or resulting from the performance or nonperformance of this Agreement, that may be brought or instituted against the City, its officers and employees, on any such claim or demand, and pay or satisfy any judgment that may be rendered against the City in any such action, suit or legal proceedings, or result thereof, regardless whether caused in part by a party indemnified hereunder, excluding, however, any such actions, suits or legal proceedings arising from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the City, its officers or employees.

9. Improvement Security. (a) At the time provided in a subsequent SIA for a SLFM, Principal shall obtain and furnish to City an improvement security consisting of a surety bond in favor of City, issued by a corporate surety authorized to do business in the State of California, and in form approved by City, securing the faithful performance by Principal of the work of improvement required, and also securing the payment of the costs and interest, if any, due under Sections 12.030.210 et seq. of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code, as provided in Paragraph 4 herein and an additional bond issued by a corporate surety authorized to do business in the State of California, in the amount of not less than 50 percent of the total estimated cost of the improvement, securing payment to contractor, his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials for the improvement. (b) In lieu of said corporate surety bonds, Principal may furnish an improvement

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 2

CONTRACT NO. 2022-230
Subdivision Improvement Agreement Updated: 10/26/21
Between the City of Rancho Cordova and
K. Hovnanian at Jaeger Ranch, LLC 4
security consisting of a letter of credit, certificate of deposit, or similar instrument of credit, in form satisfactory to City, issued by a financial institution subject to regulation by the State or Federal government, pledging that the funds necessary to meet the performance required herein are on deposit, and guaranteed for payment on demand. Said letter of credit, certificate of deposit, or similar instrument of credit shall provide that the funds designated therein shall become trust funds for the purposes set forth in said instrument. (c) The failure of Principal to commence the required work of improvements, or to complete the same within the time required after commencement thereof, as detailed in the subsequent SIA for a SLFM described in Exhibit A, shall entitle City to the full payment of the security, or so much thereof as may be necessary to complete the required work of improvement pursuant to the applicable subsequent SIA for said SLFM. The amount of the surety bond for faithful performance shall be determined in the subsequent SIA for said SLFM.

The amount of the surety bond for the payment of the claims of the contractor, his subcontractors, and to persons renting equipment or furnishing labor or materials for the improvement shall be at least 50 percent of the above amount. The letter of credit, certificate of deposit or similar instrument of credit, or cash deposit for faithful performance, shall be in the above amount plus an additional 50 percent for the purposes set forth herein. (d) Prior to issuance of improvements plans not already bonded or secured through a subsequent SIA, Principal shall obtain and furnish to City an improvement security in favor of City under Chapter 12.03 of the Rancho Cordova Municipal Code. (e) This Agreement shall automatically terminate as to any portion of the Project where a subsequent SIA for a SLFM has been entered into with the City.

10. Improvement Security As Condition Precedent. The furnishing of the improvement security by Principal as required by Paragraph 10 hereof shall be a condition precedent to acceptance by City of the above-described real property and the performance by the City of the covenants herein on its part to be performed.

11. Execution By Real Party In Interest. Where title to the subdivision property is held by the record owner thereof under a holding agreement, this Agreement must be executed by the real party or parties in interest.

12. Waiver of Civil Code Section 2819. Any extension of time hereunder shall not operate to release the surety on any bond filed pursuant to this Agreement or pursuant to a subsequent SIA for a SLFM. In this connection the surety waives the provisions of Section

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 2

CONTRACT NO. 2022-230
Subdivision Improvement Agreement Updated: 10/26/21
Between the City of Rancho Cordova and
K. Hovnanian at Jaeger Ranch, LLC 5
2819 of the Civil Code of the State of California.

13. Interest. Interest shall accrue at the highest rate permitted by law on all sums from the date payment is due under the terms of this Agreement and the sum due is certain or reasonably capable of being made certain.

14. Attorneys’ Fees. In the event that it is necessary for the City to enforce the obligations secured by the improvement security furnished pursuant to Paragraph 10 hereof, the City shall be entitled to recover its costs and reasonable expenses and fees, including reasonable attorneys' fees, as provided for in Government Code Section 66499.4.

15. Amendments. This Agreement may be modified or amended, or any of its provisions waived, only by a subsequent written agreement executed by the parties hereto.

16. Entire Agreement. This Agreement and any attachments hereto constitute the sole, final, complete, exclusive and integrated expression and statement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement among the parties hereto concerning the subject matter addressed herein, and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements, oral or written, that may be related to the subject matter of this Agreement.

17. Construction and Interpretation. It is agreed and acknowledged by the Principal that the provisions of this Agreement have been arrived at through negotiation, and that the Principal has had a full and fair opportunity to revise the provisions of this Agreement and to have such provisions reviewed by legal counsel. Therefore, the normal rule of construction that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not apply in construing or interpreting this Agreement.

18. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and assigns of the parties hereto. Principal may assign its rights and obligations under this Agreement only with the prior written consent of City.

19. Time. Time is of the essence in the performance of each and every term of this Agreement.

SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWING

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 2

CONTRACT NO. 2022-230
Subdivision Improvement Agreement Updated: 10/26/21
Between the City of Rancho Cordova and
K. Hovnanian at Jaeger Ranch, LLC 6
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first set forth above, which date shall be considered by the Parties to be the effective date of this Agreement.

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA,
California Municipal Corporation
_______________________________
Micah Runner, City Manager

PRINCIPAL
K. Hovnanian at Jaeger Ranch, LLC,
A California limited liability company
________________________________
Timothy J. Collison, Region Controller
Date: __________________________ Date: ___________________________ ATTEST:
__________________________________
Stacy Leitner, CMC, City Clerk

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 3

ITEM 16.12. ATTACHMENT 3

CHRYSANTHY BLVD

AMERICANOS BLVD

ALAMOSA DR

COAL CREEK WAY

WHEAT RIDGE DR

ROSEFINCH WAY

CHATUM CT

D UCKHA WK CIR

CROSSROADS WAY

PATAGONIAN WAY

SURFBIRD WAY

HAWKFINCH CIR

VICINITY MAP OF
THE RANCH PHASE 2
SUBDIVISION NO. FM-2021-002-04
¯
0 300 600
Feet
Aerial Photo Date: March 2022
ATTACHMENT 4

DOUGLAS RD

SUNRISE BLVD

GRANT LINE RD

KIEFER BLVD

LOCATION MAP
Path: X:\GIS_Staff\PROJECTS\PUBLIC_WORKS\DEVELOPMENT\SUBDIVISIONS\THE_RANCH_LLM_PHASE_2\THE_RANCH_LLM_PHASE_2.mxd | Date: 5/18/2023 DETAIL
AREA
ITEM 16.12.

MEMORANDUM
City Council Staff Report - Page 1 of 2

ITEM 17.1.

DATE: June 5, 2023
TO: Honorable Mayor and Council Members
FROM: Elizabeth Sparkman, Community Development Director Dalia Fadl, Principal Engineer
SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION APPROVING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL

LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPING
AND LIGHTING DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Resolution.

RESULT OF RECOMMENDED ACTION
Adoption of the Resolution would authorize the continuance of the annual levy and collection of assessments in the District. There are no new impacts on existing or new residents. No assessments shall increase as a result of this action.

BACKGROUND
On May 15, 2023, the City Council approved Resolutions ordering the preparation of the Engineer’s Annual Levy Report and set the public hearing to be held prior to approving and ordering the levy of assessments for Fiscal Year 2023-2024. The assessments fund the ongoing landscape maintenance services in the District. There are no new impacts on existing or new residents. No assessments shall increase as a result of this action.

State law requires the City Council to direct an Engineer’s Report to be prepared each year and to hold a public hearing on the Report and the levy of the annual assessments. On May 15, 2023, the City initiated the proceedings for the annual levy and collection of assessments by adopting a Resolution ordering the preparation of the Engineer’s Report and a Resolution preliminarily approving the Engineer’s Report, declaring its intention to levy and collect annual assessments for Fiscal Year 2023-2024, and set today as the time and place to conduct a public hearing on the matter.

The Engineer’s Report includes a diagram of the assessment area, a description of the maintenance services to be provided, a description of the property to be benefited, and the amount of the assessment for each individual property. The services performed within and funded by LLD 2005-1 include ongoing maintenance, operation and servicing of landscaping and streetscape improvements within the right-of-ways and other public areas within the District at the locations described in the Engineer’s Report.

City Council Staff Report - Page 2 of 2

The proposed Fiscal Year 2023-2024 assessment rates do not exceed the rates previously levied by the County since 1994 and are equal to the rates levied by the City in Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The boundaries of each Zone shown in the district diagram in Part IV of the Engineer’s Report and the details for each Zone are described in Section II, Part A of the Engineer’s Report.

The Fiscal Year 2023-2024 total assessment is estimated at $89,037. The District has an established Operating Reserve which provides funding for the operations and maintenance of the District, as well as providing financing for emergency expenditures. A second reserve fund finances special projects such as a central irrigation system, revegetation projects, and other rehabilitation projects or replacements of District improvements.

In July 2006, the County transferred funds previously collected in the County’s Zone 4 and 5 to the City, which were deposited into the LLD 2005-1. The City had previously deemed that these transferred funds are to be used exclusively by the District and shall be considered as undesignated reserves within the Zones of the District. Funds from the undesignated reserve can be used to fund the costs of any zone(s) that are unable to be funded by the annual assessments.

In order to proceed with the levy of assessments, it is appropriate for the Council to conduct the public hearing and adopt a Resolution which approves the Engineer’s Report and authorizes the levy and collection of assessments for Fiscal Year 2023-2024.

FISCAL IMPACT AND FUNDING SOURCE
There is no fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund.

ATTACHMENT(S)

1. Resolution

2. Exhibit A to the Resolution - Engineer's Report

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 1 of 3

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
RESOLUTION NO. XX-2023

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA, STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ANNUAL LEVY AND COLLECTION OF ASSESSMENTS FOR LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING DISTRICT 2005-1 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024
WHEREAS, the City Council has, by previous Resolutions, ordered the preparation of the Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2023-2024 for Landscaping and Lighting District 2005-1, (pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of California, beginning with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”); and
WHEREAS, the Engineer’s Annual Report, Exhibit A, has been presented to City Council as required by Chapter 3, Section 22623 of said Act, and as previously directed by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this City Council has carefully examined and reviewed the Report as presented, and is satisfied with each and all of the items and documents as set forth therein, and is satisfied that the levy has been spread in accordance with the benefits received from the improvements, operation, maintenance and services to be performed, as set forth in said Report; and
WHEREAS, the City and its legal counsel have reviewed Proposition 218 and found that these assessments comply with applicable provisions of Article XIII D of the California State Constitution; and
WHEREAS, upon reasonable written notice by Sacramento County of any claim or challenge, the City of Rancho Cordova agrees to defend with counsel of its choice, indemnify and hold harmless Sacramento County, its Board of Supervisors, officers, officials, agents and employees (collectively “the County”), against the payment of any liabilities, losses, costs and expenses, including attorney fees and court costs, not due to the County’s own active negligence or willful misconduct, which the County may incur in the exercise and performance of its powers and duties in placing these assessments onto the County roll and tax bills for the City of Rancho Cordova.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA AS FOLLOWS:

1. Following notice duly given, the City Council has held a full and fair public hearing regarding the District, the levy and collection of assessments, the Report prepared in connection therewith, and considered all oral and written statements, protests and communications made or filed by interested persons regarding these matters.

2. Based upon its review (and amendments, as applicable) of the Report, a copy of which has been presented to the City Council, is hereby approved (as amended), and is ordered to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a permanent record and to remain open to public inspection, the City Council hereby finds and determines that:

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 2 of 3
a. The land within the District will be benefited by the operation, maintenance and servicing of improvements, located within the boundaries of the District, and b. District includes all of the lands so benefited, and c. The net amount to be assessed upon the lands within the District in accordance with the assessment for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024, is apportioned by a formula and method which fairly distributes the net amount among all eligible parcels in proportion to the estimated special benefits to be received by each parcel from the improvements and services.

3. The maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements and appurtenant facilities shall be performed pursuant to the Act. The City Council hereby orders the proposed improvements to be made, which improvements are briefly described as follows: the maintenance and operation of and the furnishing of services and materials for turf, ground cover, shrubs and plants, trees, irrigation and drainage systems, street lighting improvements, equipment, utilities, ornamental lighting, masonry walls or other fencing, hardscape improvements, monuments, and associated appurtenant facilities located within the landscape easements or public right-of-ways.

4. The County Auditor of the County of Sacramento shall enter on the County Assessment Roll opposite each eligible parcel of land the amount of levy so apportioned by the formula and method outlined in the Report, and such levies shall be collected at the same time and in the same manner as the County taxes are collected, pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 2, Section 22646 of the Act. After collection by the County, the net amount of the levy shall be paid to the City Treasurer.

5. The City Treasurer shall deposit all money representing assessments collected by the County for the District to the credit of a fund for the City of Rancho Cordova Landscaping and Lighting District 2005-1 and such money shall be expended only for the maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements together with all other costs of the District as described in Section 3.

6. The adoption of this Resolution constitutes the District levy for the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 2023, and ending June 30, 2024.

7. The City Clerk, or their designate, is hereby authorized and directed to file the levy with the County Auditor upon adoption of this Resolution, pursuant to Chapter 4, Article 1, Section 22641 of the Act.

8. Francisco and Associates, Inc. is hereby designated to file the levy with the County Auditor/Controller on behalf of the City. The City Clerk is directed to deliver a certified copy of this adopted Resolution to Francisco and Associates, Inc. within two weeks of adoption via either e-mail [email protected] or US Mail to: Francisco and Associates, Inc., 231 Market Place, Suite 543, San Ramon, CA 94583 Attn: Brian Brown.

9. That the above recitals are all true and correct. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution, and the minutes of this meeting shall so reflect the presentation of and final approval of the Report.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova this 5th day of June, 2023, by the following vote:

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 1
Resolution No. XX-2023 Page 3 of 3
AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

ATTEST:
________________________________
Linda Budge, Mayor
________________________________
Stacy Leitner,CMC
City Clerk

Landscape & Lighting
District No. 2005-1
Fiscal Year 2023-24
Final Engineer’s Report
June 5, 2023
ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Table of Contents
Page No.

Certificate .........................................................................................................................ii Section I – Introduction………………………………………………………………………... 1 Section II – Engineer’s Report..........................................................................................3 Part A. Plans and Specifications........................................................................... 5 Part B. Estimate of Cost ..................................................................................... 10 Part C. Assessment District Diagram.................................................................. 17 Part D. Method of Apportionment of Assessments ............................................. 19 Part E. Assessment Roll..................................................................................... 24 ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

ENGINEER'S REPORT

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2005-1
FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
The undersigned, acting on behalf of Francisco & Associates respectfully submits the enclosed Engineer's Report as directed by the Rancho Cordova City Council pursuant to the provisions of Article XIIID, Section 4 of the California Constitution, provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 and Section 22500 et al of the California Streets and Highways Code. The undersigned certifies that he is a Professional Engineer, registered in the State of California.

Dated: April 14, 2023 By:

Eduardo R. Espinoza, P.E.

R.C.E No. 83709
ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

SECTION I

INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the provisions of the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, being Part 2 of Division 15 of the California Streets and Highways Code, commencing with Section 22500 (hereafter referred to as the “1972 Act”), and in compliance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the California State Constitution Article XIIID (hereafter referred to as the “California Constitution”), the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova, County of Sacramento, State of California (hereafter referred to as “City”), has by resolution initiated proceedings in connection with the ongoing maintenance of the special assessment district designated as:

Landscape and Lighting District No. 2005-1
(hereafter referred to as “District”), for the purpose of continuing and providing for the ongoing maintenance and operation of landscaping and lighting improvements within the District.

In Fiscal Year 2005-06, as part of the District formation to continue the assessments previously levied by the County as part of the Sacramento Landscape Maintenance District (“SLMD”) Zone 4 and Zone 5 for properties within the boundary of the City, the City conducted a Property Owner Protest Ballot proceeding for the District assessments pursuant to the provisions of the California Constitution, Article XIIID Section 4. In conjunction with this ballot proceeding, the City Council also conducted a noticed public hearing to consider public testimonies, comments, and written protests regarding the formation of the District and levy of maximum assessments. Upon conclusion of the public hearing, property owner protest ballots received were opened and tabulated to determine whether a majority protest existed (ballots were weighted based upon the assessment amounts), and by resolution the City Council confirmed the results of the ballot tabulation. Tabulation of the ballots indicated that a majority protest did not exist for the continuation and transfer of assessments as presented and described in the Fiscal Year 2005-06 Engineer’s Report. The City Council approved the report, ordered the formation of the District, and approved the levy and collection of Fiscal Year 2005- 06 assessments. The Fiscal Year 2005-06 assessments were then submitted to the Sacramento County Auditor/Controller for inclusion on the property tax roll for each parcel.

The improvements and assessments described in this Report are based on the improvements and assessments previously established by the County for SLMD Zone 4 and Zone 5, and represent an estimate of the direct expenditures, incidental expenses, and fund balances associated with the maintenance and servicing of those improvements. The structure of the District (organization), the improvements, the method of apportionment, and assessments described herein have been established to continue the maintenance of the existing improvements and assessments previously established by the County as outlined in the District’s Fiscal Year 2005-06 Engineer’s Report.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

For Fiscal Year 2023-24, this Report has been prepared and presented to the City Council describing the District, any changes to the District or improvements, and the proposed cost estimate and assessments for this fiscal year, and the City Council shall hold a noticed public hearing regarding these matters prior to approving and ordering the proposed levy of assessments. Should the proposed annual assessments for the District or portion thereof, exceed the maximum assessments described herein (as approved by the property owners), the new or increased assessment must be confirmed through another property owner protest ballot proceeding before the new or increased assessment may be imposed. It should be noted that an increased assessment to an individual property resulting from changes in development or land use does not constitute an increased assessment.

The word “parcel,” for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) by the County Assessor’s Office.

The County Auditor/Controller uses Assessor’s Parcel Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify properties to be assessed on the tax roll for special benefit assessments.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

SECTION II
ENGINEER’S REPORT PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS OF LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972 SECTION 22500 THROUGH 22679

OF THE CALIFORNIA STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE

CITY OF RANCHO CORDOVA
LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2005-1
FISCAL YEAR 2023-24
Pursuant to the 1972 Act, and in accordance with the Resolution of Intention, being Resolution No. adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cordova on May 15, 2023, I, Eduardo R. Espinoza, the duly appointed Engineer of Work, Assessment Engineer for the City of Rancho Cordova Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No. 2005-1 (the “District”) submit the following Report, consisting of Section I (Introduction), and this Section II, which consists of five (5) parts as follows:

Part A – PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
This part describes the improvements maintained by the District. The District was formed with four (4) benefit zones encompassing all lots and parcels of land within the boundaries of the City. The territory within the District had previously been assessed through Zone 4 and Zone 5 of the SLMD in Fiscal Year 2004-05. The District was first assessed in Fiscal Year 2005-06. Plans and specifications for the improvements are on file at the City of Rancho Cordova, and are incorporated herein by reference.

Part B – ESTIMATE OF COST
This part contains an estimate of the annual costs to operate, maintain, and service the District’s landscaping and lighting improvements and facilities. The estimate included herein, is also on file at the City of Rancho Cordova.

Part C – ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
This part incorporates a diagram of the District showing the exterior boundaries of the District, the boundaries of any zones within the District and the lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel of land within the District. Reference is hereby made to the County Assessor’s maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of each lot and parcel of land within the District. This diagram has been prepared by the Engineer of Work and is on file at the City of Rancho Cordova.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Part D – METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS
This part includes a discussion of benefits the improvements and services provide to properties within the District and the method of apportionment of assessments used to calculate each property’s proportional special benefit and annual assessment.

Part E – ASSESSMENT ROLL
This part contains a listing of the proposed assessment amount for each parcel within the District. The proposed assessment amount for each parcel is based on the parcel’s proportional special benefit as outlined in the method of apportionment of assessments.

The Assessment Roll is also filed in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cordova and is incorporated in this report.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Part A

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Description of the District
The territory within the District consists of the lots and parcels of land that in Fiscal Year 2004-05 were both within the City and within a portion of Zone 4 and all of Zone 5 of the Sacramento Landscape Maintenance District (“SLMD”). Said territory encompasses an area of land totaling approximately five hundred twelve acres (512 acres) that is centrally located within the City, generally south of Highway 50 and north of the southern City limits.

Zone 1: That portion of the previous SLMD Zone 4, which at the time of the formation of the District included a total of ninety-seven (97) assessable parcels within the residential subdivision known as Ellenwood Court located south of Ellenwood Avenue.

Upon formation of the District, this area was designated as Zone 1 to reflect the special benefit these parcels receive from the District improvements associated with the development located on the south side of Ellenwood Avenue.

Zones 2, 3 and 4: The parcels within previous SLMD Zone 5, which at the time of the formation of the District included a total of six hundred eighty-six (686) assessable parcels generally located south of the American River, east of Mather Field Road, and near Zinfandel Drive and International Drive. Upon formation of the District, this area was designated as Zones 2, 3, 4, and 4A and are further described as follows:

Zone 2 included the one hundred fifty-four (154) assessable parcels within the residential subdivision known as California Jazz Units 1 & 2, generally located east of Data Drive, north of Reserve Drive, south of Capital Center Drive and west of International Drive.

Zone 3 included the eight (8) assessable parcels located on either side of Zinfandel Drive from Data Drive to the southern boundary of the District (approximately 700 feet south of International Drive).

Zone 4 included the remaining parcels that were previously included in SLMD Zone 5 that were not designated as either Zone 2 or Zone 3 of the District. This Zone includes parcels along Data Drive, International Drive, Capital Center Drive, White Rock Road, Quality Drive, Disk Drive, Prospect Park Drive and Kilgore Road.

Zone 4A is the portion of Zone 4 that also lies within the City’s Community Facilities District No. 2005-2 (“CFD 2005-2”). Tax Zone 1 of CFD 2005-2 was established to fund, to the extent that funds from CFD 2005-2 are available, maintenance of landscape improvements of the residential subdivision development known as Capital Village. These landscape improvements were installed along the subdivision’s rights-of-way and within the median(s) adjacent to ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

the development. The funds from Tax Zone 1 of CFD 2005-2, to the extent available, shall offset all or a portion of the costs within Zone 4A.

Description of Improvements and Services
The purpose of this District is to ensure the ongoing maintenance, operation and servicing of local landscaping and street lighting improvements within the District (improvements that had been previously funded through annual assessments from the SLMD). The improvements may consist of all or a portion of the public landscaped areas, street lighting and appurtenant facilities within and adjacent to the District. These improvements may include, but are not limited to the materials, equipment, utilities, labor, appurtenant facilities and expenses necessary for the ongoing maintenance and operation of public street lighting and landscape improvements, including, but not limited to parkways, medians and other designated easements, rights-of-way or public areas within the District. The improvements to be maintained and funded entirely or partially through the District assessments are generally described as:

Improvements and Services Permitted Pursuant to the 1972 Act As generally defined by the 1972 Act, the improvements and associated assessments for this District may include now or in the future one or more of the following:
1) The installation or planting of landscaping;
2) The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamental structures and facilities;
3) The installation or construction of public lighting facilities including, but not limited to streetlights and traffic signals;
4) The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the maintenance or servicing thereof;
5) The installation of park or recreational improvements, including, but not limited to, all the following:
a) Land preparation, such as grading, leveling, cutting and filling, sod, landscaping, irrigation systems, sidewalks, and drainage. b) Lights, playground equipment, play courts, and public restrooms. 6) The acquisition of land for park, recreational, or open-space purposes or any existing improvement otherwise authorized pursuant to this section.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

7) The maintenance or servicing, of any of the foregoing including the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improvement including but not limited to:
a) Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvements; b) Grading, clearing, removal of debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks, or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities;
c) Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping, including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or treating for disease or injury;
d) The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste; e) The cleaning, sandblasting, and painting of walls and other improvements to remove or cover graffiti;
f) Electric current or energy, gas, or other illuminating agent for any public lighting facilities or for the lighting or operation of any other improvements; g) Water for the irrigation of any landscaping, the operation of any fountains, or the maintenance of any other improvements.
8) Incidental expenses associated with the improvements including, but not limited to:
a) The cost of preparation of the report, including plans, specifications, estimates, diagram, and assessment;
b) The costs of printing, advertising, and the publishing, posting and mailing of notices;
c) Compensation payable to the County for collection of assessments; d) Compensation of any engineer or attorney employed to render services; e) Any other expenses incidental to the construction, installation, or maintenance and servicing of the improvements;
f) Costs associated with any elections held for the approval of a new or increased assessment.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Landscape Improvements
The landscape improvements for the District may include, but are not limited to turf, ground cover, shrubs and plants, trees, irrigation and drainage systems, ornamental lighting, masonry walls or other fencing, hardscape improvements, monuments, and associated appurtenant facilities located within the landscape easements or public rightsof-way. Zone specific landscape improvements are described generally as follows:

Zone 1: Streetscape (parkway) landscaping along the South side of Ellenwood Avenue east of Routier Road that is within the public rights-of-way or easements dedicated to the City for maintenance. The costs and special benefits of these improvements are shared equally by only the assessable properties within Zone 1 of the District.

Zone 2: Streetscape (parkway) landscaping surrounding and adjacent to the California Jazz subdivision on the north side of Reserve Drive from Data Drive to International Drive; the east side of Data Drive from Reserve Drive north to the end of the subdivision; the west side of Capital Center Drive from International Drive north to the end of the subdivision; and the north side of International Drive from Reserve Drive to Capital Center Drive. The costs and special benefits of these improvements are proportionately shared by only the properties within Zone 2 of the District.

Zone 3: Streetscape (parkway) landscaping on both sides of Zinfandel Drive between International Drive and Data Drive. The costs and special benefits of these improvements are proportionately shared by only the properties within Zone 3 of the District.

Zones 2, 3, 4 and 4A: All median landscape improvements within the District located on International Drive from approximately 570 feet westerly of Data Drive to Kilgore Road and on Zinfandel Drive from Data Drive to International Drive. The costs and special benefits of these improvements are proportionately shared by all the properties within Zone 2, 3, 4 and 4A of the District.

Specifically, the landscape improvement areas for this District generally consist of the following:
• Approximately 9,600 square feet of streetscape (parkway) landscaping and 34 trees within the public rights-of-way located on the south side of Ellenwood Avenue.
• Approximately 11,000 square feet of turf, 28,455 square feet of streetscape (parkway) landscaping including 110 trees, located on the north side of Reserve Drive from Data Drive to International Drive; east side of Data Drive, from Reserve Drive north to end of California Jazz tract Unit No. 1; west side of Capital Center Drive, from International Drive north to the end of California Jazz Tract Unit No. 2; and north side of International Drive, from Reserve Drive to Capital Center Drive.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

• Approximately 19,400 square feet of turf, 11,500 square feet of streetscape (parkway) landscaping including 57 trees, located on the west side of Zinfandel Drive, south of International Drive.
• Approximately 152,340 square feet of turf, 55,600 square feet of streetscape and median landscaping including 392 trees along International Drive; and medians on International Drive, west of Data Drive to Kilgore Road.

Specifically, not included as District improvements, are those improvements located on private property, improvements and facilities that may be provided or maintained by an agency other than the City; improvements and facilities that may be provided by another assessment or tax levied by the City or County and any improvement provided and maintained by a Homeowner’s Association or similar entity.

Detailed descriptions of the location and extent of the specific improvements to be maintained by the District are on file with the City and by reference are made part of this Report. The net annual cost to provide and maintain the improvements determined to be of special benefit shall be allocated to each property in proportion to the special benefits received.

Public Lighting Improvements
Lighting facilities that may be located within the landscaped areas including safety lights, security lights or ornamental lights installed as part of the landscape improvements are included as part of the landscape maintenance costs.

The lighting improvements may include but shall not be limited to the cost of providing electrical energy and servicing of lighting fixtures, poles, meters, conduits, electrical cable and associated appurtenant facilities associated with the street lighting, safety lighting and/or traffic signals within the District including public lighting facilities on designated arterial and collector streets as well as lighting facilities within residential subdivisions or public areas such as parks. The cost of such improvements shall be allocated based on the proportional special benefits properties receive from these improvements.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Part B

ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The maximum assessment per parcel or acre shown herein is based on the cost of providing for the District improvements and does not include any other assessments or charges imposed on the properties. The cost estimate within this report identifies the cost to maintain the improvements within each specified zone of the District.

Each zone within the District maintains two separate reserves, one is utilized for working capital purposes (the “Operating Reserve”) and the other for longer-term projects (the “Special Projects Reserve”). The Operating Reserve provides cash for the ongoing operations and maintenance of the District, as well as providing funding for unanticipated expenditures. The size of the Operating Reserve for each zone is limited by Streets and Highways Code 22569, which states that an Operating Reserve shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and services from the first day of the fiscal year (July 1) to the date that the agency expects to receive the first apportionment of collections from the County. The City has determined that all cost estimates as presented in this report shall be considered as costs to maintain and service the District, or incidental expenses thereof, as to the application of the Streets and Highways Code 22569.

The Special Projects Reserve can be used to finance the Central Irrigation System (CIS) project and re-vegetation projects, as well as other rehabilitation projects, repairs or replacements of District improvements.

The Cost Estimate for the District prepared by the City for Fiscal Year 2023-24 follows on the next page.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

A description of the terms used in the preceding Cost Estimate table are listed on the following pages.

Zone 1
Cost
Estimate
Zone 2
Cost
Estimate
Zone 3
Cost
Estimate
Zone 4
Cost
Estimate
Zone 4A
Cost
Estimate Totals

DIRECT COSTS
Contract Maintenance - Landscaping $ 15,000 $ 16,000 $ 40,000 $ 29,000 $ 5,000 $ 105,000 Utilities (Water/Electricity) - Landscaping $ 7,000 $ 17,000 $ 28,000 $ 27,000 $ 5,000 $ 84,000 Utilities (Electricity) - Lighting $ 400 $ 400 $ 1,500 $ 300 $ 100 $ 2,700 Periodic Repair/Rehabilitation - Landscaping $ 1,150 $ 1,150 $ 1,500 $ 1,300 $ 200 $ 5,300 Periodic Repair/Rehabilitation - Lighting $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Direct Costs $ 23,550 $ 34,550 $ 71,000 $ 57,600 $ 10,300 $ 197,000 Special Project Expenditures $ - $ - $ 40,500 $ - $ - $ 40,500 Special Project Expenditures (District Reorganization) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Special Project Costs $ - $ - $ 40,500 $ - $ - $ 40,500

ADMINISTRATION COSTS
District Administration $ 1,868 $ 2,831 $ 6,257 $ 4,350 $ 1,064 $ 16,370 Contract Administration $ 949 $ 1,721 $ 3,992 $ 2,670 $ 668 $ 10,000 County Collection Fees $ 143 $ 227 $ 27 $ 77 $ 1,178 $ 1,652 Other City Administration Costs $ 28 $ 52 $ 120 $ 80 $ 20 $ 300 Total Administration Costs $ 2,988 $ 4,831 $ 10,396 $ 7,177 $ 2,930 $ 28,322 Total Direct and Administration Costs $ 26,538 $ 39,381 $ 121,896 $ 64,777 $ 13,230 $ 265,822

MISCELLANEOUS COSTS AND COLLECTIONS/(CREDITS) APPLIED TO LEVY Replenishment/(Use) of Operating Reserve $ (22,458) $ (38,827) $ - $ (54,370) $ (1,860) $ (117,515) Contribution to/(Use) of Special Projects Reserve $ - $ - $ (49,270) $ - $ - $ (49,270) Revenues from Other Sources⁽¹⁾ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (10,000) $ (10,000) Miscellaneous Costs and Collections/(Credits) Applied to Levy $ (22,458) $ (38,827) $ (49,270) $ (54,370) $ (11,860) $ (176,785) Balance to Levy $ 4,080 $ 554 $ 72,626 $ 10,407 $ 1,370 $ 89,037

DISTRICT STATISTICS & ASSESSMENT RATES
Number of Assessable Parcels 96 154 18 52 783 1,103
Assessable Acreage N/A 18.180 51.390 341.430 45.135 456.135 Rate per Parcel to Fully-Fund Zone $ 42.50 N/A N/A N/A N/A Rate per Acre to Fully-Fund Zone N/A $ 30.49 $ 1,413.25 $ 30.48 $ 30.48 Maximum Rate per Parcel $ 42.50 $ - $ - $ - $ -
Maximum Rate per Acre $ - $ 30.48 $ 1,413.24 $ 30.48 $ 30.48 Estimated Maximum Assessment Revenue(2) $ 4,080 $ 554 $ 72,626 $ 10,407 $ 1,370 $ 89,037 Variance above/(below) Maximum Revenue $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ (0)

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Operating Reserve Fund Balance(3)
Beginning Operating Fund Reserve Balance 7-1-2023 (est.) $ (33,140) $ (97,211) $ 60,948 $ (76,224) $ (28,887) $ (174,514) add: Collect from FY 2023-24 Levy $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - less: Use for FY 2023-24 Expenses $ (22,458) $ (38,827) $ - $ (54,370) $ (1,860) $ (117,515) Transfer from/(to) Special Projects Reserve $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Operating Reserve Fund Balance 6-30-2024 (est.) $ (55,598) $ (136,038) $ 60,948 $ (130,594) $ (30,747) $ (292,029) Special Projects Reserve Fund Balance
Beginning Special Projects Reserve Fund Balance 7-1-2023 (est.) $ - $ - $ 304,217 $ - $ - $ 304,217 add: Collect from FY 2023-24 Levy $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - less: Use for FY 2023-24 Projects $ - $ - $ (49,270) $ - $ - $ (49,270) Transfer from/(to) Operating Reserve $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Ending Special Projects Reserve Fund Balance 6-30-2024 (est.) $ - $ - $ 254,947 $ - $ - $ 254,947 (1) Contribution from CFD No. 2005-2; Only affects Zone 4A. (2) The annual levy may differ slightly from the maximum revenue shown due to rounding, because of rounding limitations imposed by the County of Sacramento. (3) Negative fund balances represent funds that will need to be contributed or loaned from an appropriate funding source outside of the assessment district.

City of Rancho Cordova
Landscaping and Lighting Maintenance District No. 2005-1 Fiscal Year 2023-24 Estimate of Cost Summary
ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Direct Costs (Maintenance and Operation)
Contract Maintenance – Landscaping – Includes all regularly scheduled contract labor, materials, supplies, and equipment required to properly maintain and ensure the satisfactory condition or maintenance of all landscaping improvements, irrigation, and related drainage systems, as well as maintenance of appurtenant facilities (the “improvements”).

Utilities (Water/Electricity) – Landscaping - The furnishing of water and electricity required for the operation and maintenance of the landscaping related improvements.

Utilities (Electricity) – Lighting - The furnishing of electricity required for the operation of the lighting improvements.

Periodic Repair/Rehabilitation – Landscaping – Expected costs for repair, replacement, installation, or planned upgrades of District landscaping improvements.

Periodic Repair/Rehabilitation – Lighting – Expected costs for repair, replacement, installation or planned upgrades of District lighting improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the cost estimate.

Special Project Expenditures – Expected costs for installation, replacement or planned upgrades of District landscaping or lighting improvements for the current year that were previously funded or accumulated in the Special Projects Reserve. The Special Projects Reserve is used to accumulate funds for costs associated with the future rehabilitation, repair or replacement of these District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the cost estimate.

Administration Costs
District Administration – Estimated costs incurred by the City in preparation of the annual cost estimate and the preparation, review, posting and/or publishing of documents and notices required for City Council action to approve the annual assessments. These costs also include contracting with various professionals to provide legal, engineering and district administration services directly related to the District, including the calculation of the annual assessment amounts and the preparation of the Engineer’s’ Report.

Contract Administration – Estimated costs to coordinate and oversee the maintenance contracts and overall repair, maintenance and replacements of the District Improvements.

County Collection Fees – The fee charged to the District by the County for placing assessments on property tax bills.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Other Administration Expenses – Administration expenses not included above, including the cost to publish public notices required for City Council action relating to the District. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the cost estimate.

Total Direct and Administration Costs – The total expected costs of the District.

Miscellaneous Costs and Collections/(Credits) Applied to Levy Replenishment/(Use) of Operating Reserve – A “Replenishment” increases the levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. On the other hand, a “Use” of the Operating Reserve decreases the levy by drawing funds from the Operating Reserve for current year expenditures. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the cost estimate. Further information regarding the function of the Operating Reserve is provided in the following pages of this section.

Contribution to/(use of) Special Projects Reserve — A “Contribution” increases the levy in order to generate funding for the Special Projects Reserve. This reserve allows for the accumulation of funds for the possible rehabilitation of projects or replacement in future years. On the other hand, a “Use of” the Special Projects Reserve provides current year funding of rehabilitation projects or replacement from available funds within the Special Projects Reserve. If the expenditure of a current year special project is funded entirely by a collection from the current fiscal year levy and/or a transfer from the Undesignated Reserve, this line item may show as zero, which is the net of the two amounts. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the cost estimate. Further information regarding the function of the Special Projects Reserve is provided in the following pages of this section.

Revenues from Other Sources – These amounts represent contributions from CFD No. 2005-2; which only affects Zone 4A. This relationship is more fully described in the previous sections of this report.

Balance to Levy - This is the total amount to be levied and collected through assessments for the current fiscal year for each Zone. The Balance to Levy represents the sum of the Total District Direct and Administration Costs together with any applicable adjustments associated with Miscellaneous Costs and Collections/(Credits) as described above.

District Statistics and Assessment Rates
Number of Assessable Parcels - The total number of parcels within each zone that are expected to be assessed. Non-assessable lots or parcels include governmentowned land, public utility-owned property, land principally encumbered by public rightof-way or easements, common areas, and/or parcels within the boundaries of the District that currently do not benefit from the improvements, due possibly to development restrictions.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Assessable Acreage - The total assessable acreage within each zone that are expected to be assessed on an acreage basis for the current fiscal year.

Maximum Rate per Parcel - The maximum assessment rate that can be assessed to each non-exempt parcel within the respective zone for the current fiscal year.

Maximum Rate per Acre - The maximum assessment rate per acre that can be assessed to each non-exempt parcel within the respective zone for the current fiscal year.

Estimated Maximum Assessment Revenue – The total amount that can be assessed to all parcels within each zone for the current fiscal year based upon the expected number of assessable units and acres using the maximum assessment rates.

Operating Reserve Fund Balances
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance 7-1-2023 (est.) - The anticipated beginning balance of cash and receivables, net of any unpaid prior year obligations for each zone.

These beginning balances shall be used to fund each zone’s expenditures from July 1, 2023 to December 31, 2023, as the Operating Reserve is required to compensate for the approximate six-month delay between the start of the District’s fiscal year and the receipt of the collections from the County. The Special Projects Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the report.

Add: Collect from FY 2023-24 Levy – This amount is added to the levy in order to replenish the Operating Reserve. Due to the six-month delay from the District’s receipt of assessment collections, the Operating Reserve balance shall be sufficiently funded to provide for expenditures from the period of July 1, 2023 (the beginning of the fiscal year) through December 31, 2023. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the cost estimate.

Less: Use for FY 2023-24 Expenses – The amount of the Operating Reserve to be used to fund Fiscal Year 2023-24 expenses. Portions of the Operating Reserve may be slated for current year expenditures in order to reduce the Ending Operating Reserve Fund Balance to an amount no greater than the expected District costs for the period of July 1, 2023 (the beginning of the fiscal year) through December 31, 2023. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the cost estimate.

Transfer from/(to) the Special Projects Reserve - The amount of Operating Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Special Projects Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Special Projects Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Special Projects Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Public Works Department, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the cost estimate.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Ending Operating Reserve Fund Balance 6-30-2024 (est.) - This amount represents the anticipated Operating Reserve balance/(deficit) for each zone as of June 30, 2024.

The size of each zone’s Operating Reserve is limited by Streets and Highways Code 22569 which states that an Operating Reserve shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and service from the first day of the fiscal year (July 1) to the date that the City expects to receive the first apportionment of collections from the County, which is estimated to be December 31. Therefore, each zone may retain an Operating Reserve amounting to the District’s first six-months of expenses in order to meet ongoing obligations until the first collections are received from the County. Any deficit fund balances will be contributed or loaned to the District from a source outside of the District. All Special Projects Reserve balances, if any, are excluded from the Operating Reserve balances and shall be shown separately in the report.

Special Projects Reserve Fund Balance
Beginning Special Projects Reserve Fund Balance 7-1-2023 (est.) — The projected balance of funds in the Special Projects Reserve as of July 1, 2023. Streets and Highways Code 22660 allows the District to generate and accumulate funds over several years to fund District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment.

Add: Collect from FY 2023-24 Levy — This amount is added to the levy to accumulate funding of future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, repairs, restorations, or upgrades of District improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the cost estimate.

Less: Use for FY 2023-24 Special Projects – The amount of Special Project Reserve monies expected to be expended for special projects to fund the costs of installation, replacement, or planned upgrades of District improvements for the current year. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the cost estimate.

Transfer from/(to) the Operating Reserve — The amount of Special Projects Reserve monies to be transferred to or from the Operating Reserve. Periodically, funds held in a Special Project Reserve may be needed to respond to changing maintenance needs of the improvements or other factors. Accordingly, any or all funds held in a Special Project Reserve are subject to transfer into the same zone’s Operating Reserve, at the discretion of the Public Works Department, in order to provide for the maintenance and operation of the improvements. If zero, this line item may not be shown in the cost estimate.

Ending Special Projects Reserve Fund Balance 6-30-2024 (est.) – The projected balance of funds in the Special Projects Reserve as of June 30, 2024. These funds shall be used to provide for future year rehabilitation projects, replacements, restorations or upgrades of District improvements which cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment. Should the District have no Special Project Reserve or related activity, the Special Project Reserve information may not be presented in the report.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Special Projects Reserve – Capital Improvement Plan
Streets and Highways Code Section 22660 allows the District to generate and accumulate funds over several years to fund District improvements that cannot be conveniently raised from a single year’s assessment. Therefore, a multi-year Capital Improvement Plan is shown below for the rehabilitation, restoration, repair and/or replacement of District improvements and other allowable costs for each zone projecting an ending Special Project Reserve balance:

Zone 3:
• Upgrades to irrigation system; replacement and/or enhancement of landscape improvements: $25,000 in Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and 2024-2025. • Upgrades related to drought resistant landscaping: $15,500 in Fiscal Year 2023-2024 and 2024-2025.
• Projected costs to reorganize district, including costs of re-engineering and balloting: $25,330 in Fiscal Year 2024-2025 for Zone 3’s share of costs.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Part C

ASSESSMENT DISTRICT DIAGRAM
The parcels to be assessed consist of all lots, parcels and subdivisions of land located within the boundaries of the map designated as “Assessment Diagram of Landscape and Lighting District No. 2005-1.” The lines and dimensions of each parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the Sacramento County Assessor for the year in which this Report was prepared and are incorporated herein and made part of this Report.

A reduced copy of the Assessment Diagram is attached on the following page.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Landscape and Lighting District No. 2005-1
Assessment District Diagram
¯
Lincoln Hwy
Mather Field Rd
Zinfandel Dr
White Rock Rd
! ! ! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
! ! ! ! ! !
!
! ! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! ! ! ! !
! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
! ! !
!
! ! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! !
!
! ! ! ! !
!
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
! !
! ! ! !
1,000 500 0 1,000 2,000
Feet
International Dr
Legend
! ! ! ! ! ! LLAD 2005-1 Boundary
City Limit
Parcel Lines
LLAD 2005-1 Zone 1
LLAD 2005-1 Zone 2
LLAD 2005-1 Zone 3
LLAD 2005-1 Zone 4
ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Part D

METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENTS
The 1972 Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements, which include the construction, maintenance, and servicing of public lights, landscaping, and appurtenant facilities.

The 1972 Act further requires that the cost of these improvements be levied according to benefit rather than assessed value:
“The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.” In conjunction with the provisions of the 1972 Act, the California Constitution Article XIIID addresses several key criteria for the levy of assessments, notably:

Article XIIID Section 2d defines District as:
“District means an area determined by an agency to contain all parcels which will receive a special benefit from a proposed public improvement or property-related service”;
Article XIIID Section 2i defines Special Benefit as:
“Special benefit” means a particular and distinct benefit over and above general benefits conferred on real property located in the district or to the public at large.

General enhancement of property value does not constitute “special benefit.” Article XIIID Section 4a defines proportional special benefit assessments as:
“An agency which proposes to levy an assessment shall identify all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed. The proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entirety of the capital cost of a public improvement, the maintenance and operation expenses of a public improvement, or the cost of the property related service being provided. No assessment shall be imposed on any parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel.” The method of apportionment described in this Report for allocation of special benefit assessments utilizes commonly accepted engineering practices and have been established pursuant to the 1972 Act and the provisions of the California Constitution. The formulas used for calculating assessments reflects the composition of parcels within the District and the improvements and services provided, to fairly apportion the costs based on the special benefits to each parcel.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Benefit Analysis
Each of the proposed improvements and the associated costs and assessments have been carefully reviewed, identified, and allocated based on special benefit pursuant to the provisions of the California Constitution and 1972 Act.

The improvements provided by the District and for which properties will be assessed have been identified as necessary, required and/or desired for the development of properties within the District and as such, the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of these improvements would be the financial obligation of the parcels within the District. Therefore, the improvements and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of the improvements are a distinct and special benefit to the properties within the District. Any improvement or portion thereof that is considered to be of general benefit shall be funded by other revenue sources and not included as part of the special benefit assessments allocated to properties within the District.

Special Benefit
The method of apportionment (method of assessment) established herein is based on the premise that each assessed parcel within the District receives special benefits from specific improvements and the desirability and security of those properties is enhanced by the presence of well-maintained improvements in close proximity to those properties.

The special benefits associated with landscape improvements are specifically:
• Enhanced desirability of properties through association with the improvements. • Improved aesthetic appeal of properties providing a positive representation of the area and properties.
• Enhanced adaptation of the urban environment within the natural environment from adequate green space and landscaping.
• Environmental enhancement through improved erosion resistance, dust and debris control, and fire prevention.
• Increased sense of pride in ownership of property within the District resulting from well-maintained improvements associated with the properties. • Enhanced quality of life through well-maintained green space and landscaped areas.
• Reduced criminal activity and property-related crimes (especially vandalism) against properties in the District through well-maintained surroundings and amenities including abatement of graffiti.
• Enhanced environmental quality of the parcels by moderating temperatures, providing oxygenation, and attenuating noise.

The special benefits of street lighting and other public lighting facilities are the convenience, safety, and security of property, improvements, and goods. Specifically:
• Enhanced deterrence of crime and the aid to police protection. • Increased nighttime safety on roads, streets, and public areas. • Improved ability of pedestrians and motorists to see.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

• Improved ingress and egress to property.
• Reduced vandalism and other criminal act and damage to improvements or property.
• Improved traffic circulation and reduced nighttime accidents and personal property loss.

All the preceding factors contribute to a specific enhancement and desirability of each of the assessed parcels within the District and thereby provide special benefits to the properties. Furthermore, it has been determined that the lack of funding to properly service and maintain the District improvements could have a negative impact on the properties within the District.

General Benefit
In reviewing each of the District improvements, the proximity of those improvements to both properties within the District and those outside the District as well as the reasons for installing and constructing such improvements, it is evident that the improvements are solely for the benefit of properties within the District and the ongoing maintenance and operation of the improvements will directly affect the properties within the District.

Although the improvements include public areas, easements, rights-of-way and other amenities available or visible to the public at large, the construction and installation of these improvements were only a direct benefit to the properties within the District and were not required nor necessarily desired by any properties or developments outside the District boundary and any public access or use of the improvements by others is incidental.

Therefore, it has been determined that the improvements and the ongoing maintenance, servicing and operation of those improvements provide no measurable general benefit to properties outside the District or to the public at large, but clearly provide distinct and special benefits to properties within the District.

Assessment Methodology
The method of apportionment for the District calculates the receipt of special benefit from the respective improvements based on the actual or proposed land use of the parcels within the District. The special benefit received by each lot or parcel is equated to the overall land use of parcels within the District based on the parcel’s actual land use or proposed development.

All costs associated with the improvements shall be fairly distributed among the parcels based upon the special benefit received by each parcel. Additionally, in compliance with the California Constitution, each parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred to that parcel. The benefit formula used to determine the assessment obligation is therefore based upon both the improvements that benefit the parcels within the District as well as the proposed land use of each property as compared to other parcels that benefit from those specific improvements.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

At the time that the District was being formed and to identify and determine the special benefit to be received by each parcel and their proportionate share of the improvement costs, it was necessary to consider the entire scope of improvements to be maintained by the District, as well as individual property development within the District. Upon review of the improvements to be maintained, it was determined that four (4) distinct areas benefit differently from the improvements within the District and therefore the landscape maintenance and assessments were established as four (4) benefit zones for the allocation of the assessments and proportional special benefit, as described below.

Although a portion of Zone 4 was designated as Zone 4A in Fiscal Year 2007-08, as discussed below, Zones 4 and 4A remain as one benefit zone and are assessed at the same maximum rate.

Zones and Assessments:

Zone 1 is comprised of ninety-six (96) assessable residential properties, each of which were assessed on a per parcel basis at the pre-existing rate of $42.50 per parcel.

Zone 2 is comprised of one hundred fifty-four (154) assessable residential properties within the developments known as California Jazz Unit No.1 and Unit No. 2. Each of the one hundred fifty-four (154) assessable parcels were assessed as residential properties on an acreage basis at the pre-existing rate of $30.48 per acre for the median landscape improvements and parkway landscape improvements associated with these parcels.

Zone 3 is comprised of eighteen (18) assessable properties, each of which were assessed on an acreage basis at the pre-existing rate of $30.48 per acre for the median landscaping and $1,382.76 per acre for the landscaping along the parkways of Zinfandel Drive, totaling $1,413.24 per acre.

Zone 4 is comprised of fifty-two (52) assessable properties, each of which were assessed on an acreage basis at the pre-existing rate of $30.48 per acre for the median landscape improvements within the District.

Zone 4A is comprised of a portion of Zone 4. Properties within Zone 4A were redesignated as Zone 4A commencing with the Fiscal Year 2007-08 to account for the Zone 4A parcels lying within a portion of CFD 2005-2, while the remaining Zone 4 parcels are outside of the CFD 2005-2 boundaries. Since the CFD 2005-2 Zone 1, special taxes are to be levied upon Zone 4A parcels, these special taxes are contributed in part to the District for the benefit of Zone 4A. Zone 1 of the CFD provides funding for landscape improvements within and adjacent to the development, including the median landscaping identified herein. Although the CFD may fund median landscaping, the special taxes levied within Capital Village may not provide sufficient funds to maintain both the landscape improvements within the Capital Village development and the median landscape improvements within the District that specially benefit the parcels within Zone 4A.

Therefore, Zone 4A is comprised of seven hundred eighty-three (783) assessable properties, each of which were assessed $30.48 per gross acre until such time that the CFD generates sufficient revenue to fund the median landscape improvements. Any funds generated by the CFD that will be used to finance the median landscape ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

improvements that benefit Zone 4A shall be transferred by the CFD to the District as a contribution to Zone 4A.

Exempt Parcels — Properties within the District that are not assessed for special benefit include but are not limited to:
• Lots or parcels identified as public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County);
• Dedicated public easements including open space areas, utility rights-of-way, greenbelts, parkways, parks, or other publicly owned properties that are part of the District improvements or may provide other benefits to private properties within the District;
• Private properties that cannot be developed independently from an adjacent property, such as common areas, sliver parcels or bifurcated lots or properties with very restrictive development use.

These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempted from assessment, but shall be reviewed annually by the assessment engineer to confirm the parcels current development status. Government owned properties or public properties are not necessarily exempt properties and shall be subject to special benefit assessment unless it qualifies for an exempt classification.

Special Cases – In many districts where multiple land uses, and zones exist, the typical property classification and assessment methodology does not accurately identify the special benefits received from the improvements for each and every parcel. For example, in some cases, only a small percentage of the parcel’s total acreage can actually be developed. In this case, an appropriate calculation would be based on the net acreage that can be utilized rather than the gross acreage of the parcel. These special circumstances will be reviewed annually by the assessment engineer.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

Part E

ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District is based on the Assessment Diagram presented herein and is based on available parcel maps and property data from the County Assessor’s Office at the time the Engineer’s Report was prepared. A listing of the proposed lots and parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts is provided herein.

Non-assessable lots or parcels may include, but are not limited to public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas, rights-of-way, common areas; landlocked parcels, small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and any other property that cannot be developed or has little or no value. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempted from assessment.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate described in this Report as approved by the City Council. Therefore, if a single parcel is subdivided to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

The following is a list of the parcels and proposed assessment amounts for each of the parcels within the District as determined by the assessment rates and method of apportionment described herein.

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Landscape and Lighting District No. 2005-1
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment Roll
APN Zone Assessment
072-0260-006-0000 4 $ 117.34
072-0260-051-0000 4 $ 206.34
072-0260-052-0000 4 $ 126.18
072-0260-054-0000 4 $ 144.78
072-0260-055-0000 4 $ 197.82
072-0260-056-0000 4 $ 92.04
072-0370-060-0000 4 $ 381.00
072-0370-063-0000 4 $ 380.08
072-0680-040-0000 4 $ 140.20
072-0680-042-0000 4 $ 285.90
072-0680-043-0000 4 $ 171.60
072-0680-048-0000 4 $ 148.44
072-0680-049-0000 4 $ 201.78
072-0680-050-0000 4 $ 201.46
072-0680-062-0000 4 $ 203.60
072-0680-063-0000 4 $ 131.98
072-0680-064-0000 4 $ 183.18
072-0680-065-0000 4 $ 71.92
072-0680-067-0000 4 $ 213.96
072-0680-068-0000 4 $ 149.96
072-0680-072-0000 4 $ 158.18
072-0680-075-0000 3 $ 2,840.60
072-0690-036-0000 4 $ 146.90
072-0690-037-0000 4 $ 141.12
072-0690-038-0000 4 $ 138.38
072-0690-039-0000 4 $ 123.44
072-0690-060-0000 4 $ 181.66
072-0690-061-0000 4 $ 283.76
072-0690-062-0000 4 $ 281.64
072-0690-063-0000 4 $ 485.84
072-0690-064-0000 4 $ 257.56
072-0690-078-0000 4 $ 259.08
072-0690-079-0000 4 $ 47.84
072-0690-080-0000 4 $ 57.30
072-0690-082-0000 4 $ 89.00
072-0690-084-0000 4 $ 410.56
072-0690-085-0000 4 $ 367.28
072-0690-086-0000 4 $ 273.10
072-0690-089-0000 4 $ 311.80
072-0690-090-0000 3 $ 8,606.62
072-0690-091-0000 3 $ 7,009.66
072-0690-093-0000 4 $ 104.54
072-0690-094-0000 4 $ 117.64
072-0690-095-0000 4 $ 99.66
072-0690-096-0000 3 $11,715.76

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Landscape and Lighting District No. 2005-1
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment Roll
APN Zone Assessment
072-0690-098-0000 3 $ 7,292.32
072-0690-099-0000 4 $ 164.58
072-0690-104-0000 4 $ 149.34
072-0690-105-0000 4 $ 157.28
072-0690-107-0000 4 $ 610.82
072-0690-108-0000 4 $ 499.86
072-0690-113-0000 4 $ 169.46
072-0690-114-0000 4 $ 221.28
072-0690-115-0000 4 $ 45.72
072-0690-116-0000 4 $ 34.74
072-0690-122-0000 4 $ 108.50
072-0690-123-0000 4 $ 159.10
072-1340-001-0000 2 $ 3.98
072-1340-002-0000 2 $ 3.92
072-1340-003-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-004-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-005-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-006-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-007-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-008-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-009-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-010-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-011-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-012-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-013-0000 2 $ 3.86
072-1340-014-0000 2 $ 4.20
072-1340-015-0000 2 $ 3.56
072-1340-016-0000 2 $ 3.04
072-1340-017-0000 2 $ 3.78
072-1340-018-0000 2 $ 4.04
072-1340-019-0000 2 $ 3.50
072-1340-020-0000 2 $ 3.34
072-1340-021-0000 2 $ 3.20
072-1340-022-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-023-0000 2 $ 3.80
072-1340-024-0000 2 $ 3.80
072-1340-025-0000 2 $ 3.44
072-1340-026-0000 2 $ 4.44
072-1340-027-0000 2 $ 5.66
072-1340-028-0000 2 $ 5.18
072-1340-029-0000 2 $ 4.96
072-1340-030-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-031-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-032-0000 2 $ 4.14
072-1340-033-0000 2 $ 4.04

ITEM 17.1. ATTACHMENT 2 Exhibit A to the Resolution

City of Rancho Cordova
Landscape and Lighting District No. 2005-1
Fiscal Year 2023-24 Assessment Roll
APN Zone Assessment
072-1340-034-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-035-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-036-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-037-0000 2 $ 3.08
072-1340-038-0000 2 $ 4.30
072-1340-039-0000 2 $ 5.48
072-1340-040-0000 2 $ 4.02
072-1340-041-0000 2 $ 3.22
072-1340-042-0000 2 $ 3.28
072-1340-043-0000 2 $ 3.32
072-1340-044-0000 2 $ 4.90
072-1340-045-0000 2 $ 5.24
072-1340-046-0000 2 $ 3.60
072-1340-047-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-048-0000 2 $ 3.78
072-1340-049-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-050-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-051-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-052-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-053-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-054-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-055-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-056-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-057-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-058-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-059-0000 2 $ 3.78
072-1340-060-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-061-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-062-0000 2 $ 3.20
072-1340-063-0000 2 $ 3.46
072-1340-064-0000 2 $ 4.82
072-1340-065-0000 2 $ 3.86
072-1340-066-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-067-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-068-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-069-0000 2 $ 3.14
072-1340-070-0000 2 $ 4.20
072-1340-071-0000 2 $ 4.32
072-1340-072-0000 2 $ 4.38
072-1340-073-0000 2 $ 4.54
072-1340-074-0000 2 $ 3.84
072-1350-001-0000 2 $ 5.42
072-1350-002-0000 2 $ 3.86
072-1350-003-0000 2 $ 3.80
072-1350-004-0000 2 $ 4.14