Agenda packet — Rancho Cucamonga City Council, June 15, 2022 (part 3 of 8)

18 2
6 0
4 from accrued sick leave benefits. The City's obligation for such payments shall commence on the first (1st) day of such disability absence. In the event the employee's disability absence should exceed three months, an employee shall be allowed to supplement the Workers Compensation benefit received under State law with available accrued sick leave, accrued vacation leave or accrued compensatory time. The total number of leave hours, along with the Workers Compensation benefit, shall not exceed the employee's base pay for each day of the leave. For this purpose, accrued leave hours can only be used in one-hour increments.

SECTION 32: MILITARY LEAVE
Employees required to serve military leave will be compensated pursuant to the Military and Veterans Code. To qualify for compensation, the military orders must be submitted to the supervisor prior to their tour of duty and must be attached to the timecard for that pay period.

SECTION 33: MILITARY SERVICE BUYBACK
Employees have the option for military service buy back at the employee's expense.

SECTION 34: OVERTIME
For the purposes of overtime calculations only hours worked, vacation leave, holiday leave, and comp time shall be considered hours worked. Use of sick leave does not count towards hours worked for the purposes of determining overtime. Overtime is compensated at 1.5 times the employee’s Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) rate of pay.

Only hours worked as defined here shall be considered for the purpose of calculating the FLSA pay.

A. Maintenance (Non-Teamsters)
The City agrees that employees who are sent home to rest and to be available to work additional hours as a result of a storm or impending emergency situation and are not subsequently recalled to work, will be compensated for the hours not worked in that shift, due to them having been sent home, to bring the total hours to 8 or 10 worked in that shift depending on their regular schedule.

Employees who are subsequently recalled to work the storm or an emergency situation will work no more than 12 consecutive hours. Any hours worked in excess of 8 or 10 in that 12-hour shift depending on their regular schedule will be paid at time and one-half, regardless of the total numbers of compensated hours for that work week.

SECTION 35: COMPENSATORY TIME
An employee that works overtime may decide to accrue compensatory time off (CTO) at 1.5 times the number of overtime hours worked instead of receiving immediate payment for overtime worked. The maximum CTO that an employee may accrue is 240 hours. Once an employee reaches that accrual cap, all additional overtime worked shall be paid. Employees may use CTO as time off, subject to supervisor approval. Supervisor shall not unreasonably

Page 206 ends

19 2
6 0
4 withhold approval for use of accrued CTO, and the need to replace the employee using CTO with another employee on overtime shall not be the basis for denying a requested use of CTO.

SECTION 36: CALL BACK PAY (NON-EXEMPT)
If an employee is required to be called back to work after completing his or her normal shift or after having left City premises or the employee’s work location, the employee shall be compensated at the rate for each hour worked on call back with a minimum of two (2) hours call back compensation at the appropriate rate, regardless of whether the employee actually works less than two (2) hours. The time starts when the call back call is received by the employee. Employees must arrive at the worksite and perform the work required in order to receive callback pay. When an employee is called on his/her day off or after hours for work purposes, the employee shall be compensated at the appropriate rate of pay or in comp time if applicable for the actual time worked, rounded to the nearest quarter hour (.25).

SECTION 37: ON CALL PAY
Employees required to be on call shall be compensated at the rate of $200.00 per week.

SECTION 38: BILINGUAL PAY
Bargaining Unit employees who qualify for bilingual pay will be provided such at $75.00 per month, Each Department Head will determine the number of employees needed to perform translation duties per department, subject to review and approval of the Deputy City Manager/ Administrative Services.

Employees who receive bilingual pay are expected to perform translation services for their Department and for other City Services should the need arise. An updated list of the employees receiving bilingual pay will be provided every six-months or as changes occur.

Bilingual duties will be distributed as equitable as possible.

SECTION 39: SAFETY FOOTWEAR AND UNIFORMS
A. Safety Footwear
The City will provide up to $350.00 annually toward the purchase of safety footwear at a city designated vendor for employees required to wear safety footwear in the performance of their job duties. The current classification of employees who may be required to wear safety footwear are Animal License Canvasser, Animal Services Officer I & II, Assistant Engineer, Building Inspector, Building Inspector Supervisor, Business License Technician, Community Improvement Officer I & II, Community Improvement Supervisor, Environmental Programs Coordinator, Environmental Programs Inspector, Fleet Supervisor, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works Inspector, Public Works Inspector I, Public Works Inspector II, Safety Coordinator, Senior Animal Services Officer, Senior Building Inspector, Senior Electrician, and Supervising Public Works Inspector.

Page 207 ends

20 2
6 0
4 Effective the first full pay period in July 2021, this allowance would permit the use of the allowance for the purchase of both shoes and accessories.

B. Uniforms
The City may provide uniforms (including shirts) and/or maintenance of uniforms for the following positions: Animal Care Attendant, Animal Caretaker, Animal Care Supervisor, Animal Handler, Animal License Canvasser, Animal Services Dispatcher, Animal Services Officer I & II, Building Inspector, Business License Technician, Community Improvement Officer I & II, Fleet Supervisor, Maintenance Supervisor, Administrative Assistant (Animal Care & Services), Senior Building Inspector, Senior Electrician, Theatre Production Supervisor, and Theatre Technician III.

The City will provide 4-5 shirts per year for positions required to wear City shirts:

Community Improvement Officers (Senior I &II), Business License Technicians, Building Inspectors (I & II) and Technicians, Public Works Inspectors (I & II).

The City reports CalPERS on an annual basis the actual value of compensation paid or the monetary value for the purchase, rental and/or maintenance of required clothing for RCCEA covered CalPERS’ Classic Members. The parties analyzed the value and determined it shall not exceed $580.00 per fiscal year. The parties agree that to the extent permitted by law, this is special compensation and shall be reported as such pursuant to Title 2 CCR, Section 571 (a)(5) Statutory Items. The parties also agree that the City has no additional obligation or costs should CalPERS, the State or the IRS determine otherwise.

SECTION 40: TEAM RC WORK APPAREL
The City will provide bargaining unit members with one Team RC shirt per fiscal year at a cost not to exceed $50.

SECTION 41: TUITION REIMBURSEMENT FOR APPROVED COLLEGE AND

UNIVERSITY COURSES
Reimbursements by the City of the following enumerated college and/or university course expenses shall not exceed three thousand three hundred dollars ($3,300.00) during any fiscal year.

Eligibility for said reimbursement in an amount not to exceed $3,300.00 in any one fiscal year shall be contingent upon a determination by the employee's department head or his designee that all the following conditions precedent exists:

A. Expenses shall be incurred as regards coursework undertaken at a college or university that is licensed/accredited by one of the six regional accreditors involved in higher education accreditation in the United States.

B. The applicant for reimbursement shall represent to the Personnel Department

Page 208 ends

21 2
6 0
4 documentation prepared by the accredited/licensed college or university which evidences the applicant's receipt of a grade of "C" or "pass" in a pass/fail class. As regards each class for which reimbursement is sought (where an employee is simultaneously enrolled in multiple approved classes and does not receive a "C" or "pass" in any one or more of such classes, the amount of expenses subject to City's reimbursement shall be reduced and/or as appropriate, pro-rated to reflect no reimbursement being made for expenses related to classes where the minimal grade was not received).

C. Eligibility for reimbursement for said expenses shall be confined to either: 1) those courses that in and of themselves consist of curriculum which is predominately related to the development of skills reasonably anticipated by the City to enhance the applicant's job performance (by means of a non-inclusive example only, art classes would not qualify for reimbursement); or 2) where the employee has declared a major that is job-related as set forth in this section C, to those classes which must be completed as a condition precedent to successful completion of the course of study in the selected major.

D. Eligibility for reimbursement upon completion of coursework shall be predicated upon the employee's department head or his designee, making a written determination prior to the affected employee's enrollment in the course(s) for which reimbursement is later sought, that the coursework is offered by an accredited college or university and that the above-described job nexus does exist. The determination of the Department Head or his designee in such regards shall be final.

E. The costs which shall be subject to reimbursement are limited to the following: 1) tuition, 2) books, 3) supplies, 4) parking, and 5) laboratory. In addition to all other conditions precedent to reimbursement set forth in this section, prior to reimbursement being approved, written receipts shall be provided to the Personnel Department and shall evidence each expenditure for which reimbursement is sought.

SECTION 42: ENCOURAGING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Promotions are movements to a different classification with a higher pay range. Bargaining unit employees are encouraged to seek regular performance feedback from their direct supervisors and other Department leadership for professional development and in order to prepare to compete for future promotional opportunities. If a member applies for a promotion to a bargaining unit position and is not selected for an interview or has an interview but is not selected for the job, the employee is encouraged to request feedback from their supervisor as to reasons why they were not selected. The supervisor will work other Department personnel and/or Human Resources to provide a response to the requesting employee within 30 days of the request.

Bargaining unit employees are encouraged to register on the City’s employment portal to be informed of promotional opportunities by email, and to check their City email account regularly for information regarding promotional opportunities.

Page 209 ends

22 2
6 0
4 SECTION 43: REQUIRED CERTIFICATIONS AND RECERTIFICATIONS The City will pay for the cost of any required certifications or recertification required of employees to maintain their positions. Required certifications must be outlined in an employee’s classification specification. The Department Director, with the approval of the City Manager, can add to but not eliminate certifications and recertifications that Departments will cover the costs for employees to maintain. Any additions by the Department Head must be applied equally to all employees in that classification.

SECTION 44: RECOVERY OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COSTS
With the goal of providing additional development opportunities to employees, the City may pay for the cost of training and certificate programs that are not specifically required to maintain the employee’s position, up to a maximum of $10,000.

Employees may request that the City pay the cost of such trainings and certifications. The Department Director and/or Deputy City Manager with the approval of the City Manager, may approve these requests, subject to budget availability.

If an employee requests participation in a training or certificate program with a registration cost of $2,000 or more, the employee will be required to repay the cost of said training or certificate program if they leave City employment within four (4) years of the registration for that program. One-quarter of the amount owed shall be forgiven each fiscal year. Employees participating in this program must sign an agreement indicating that any outstanding amount can be deducted from their final paycheck upon separation. Any outstanding amount is due at separation.

This benefit does not pertain to professional conferences related to an employee’s ongoing, continuous learning, which are routinely including within the department’s budget.

SECTION 45: 4/10 WORK WEEK
City Hall generally operates on a 4/10 work week, hours 7am to 6pm, Monday through Thursday. However, different work schedules consisting of various work hours and days may be adopted by individual departments based on departmental need. Remote facilities operate on a 40-hour work week of varying days and times.

SECTION 46: DIRECT DEPOSIT
All new bargaining unit members are required to enroll in direct deposit. Vacation buy back and comp time payouts can be by paper check.

SECTION 47: CARPOOL PROGRAM
The City has implemented a well-defined, equitable, carpool program that eliminated the previously provided time-off incentive with a financial incentive. The carpool program is open to all full-time regular employees. Participation is voluntary, and employees interested in

Page 210 ends

23 2
6 0
4 participating shall file a Rideshare Application Agreement and comply with the requirements of the program. The financial incentive for the program is $2.60 per day for every day that the bargaining unit employee carpools.

SECTION 48: CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES
The City will provide RCCEA with a list of specific Confidential Employees whose positions are covered by the Supervisory/Professional or General Employees' bargaining units. These employees are designated as Confidential Employees due to the work they perform related to employer-employee relations and the access they have to information related to employer-employee relations. The City will update that list when a new confidential employee is hired, or the duties of a current confidential employee changes and they are no longer involved in employer employee relations.

Employees designated as confidential employees may not act as representatives of employee organizations which represent other employees of the City, may not represent employees in discipline or grievance procedures and may not provide information or participate in labor negotiation on behalf of RCCEA.

Confidential Employees may be employed in some of the following positions (this list is not exhaustive):

SECTION 49: USE OF BULLETIN BOARDS AND CITY EMAIL SYSTEM The City will furnish a portion of existing bulletin board space, located in bargaining unit break areas where such bulletin boards currently exist, for RCCEA notices. Such space will be no less than 18" x 24". If insufficient bulletin board space exists in a Bargaining Unit work or break area, the RCCEA may, after receiving approval in writing from the City, put up a bulletin board not to exceed 18" x 24" depending on available space. RCCEA may also distribute notices to covered employees through the City's email system. Bulletin boards and emails shall only be used for the following notices:
 Scheduled RCCEA meetings, agenda and minutes.
 Information on RCCEA elections and the results.
 Information regarding RCCEA social, recreational, and related news bulletins.  Reports of official business of RCCEA, including negotiations, reports of committees or the Board of Directors.

City equipment (including City computers, laptops, and tablets), materials, or supplies shall Account Technician Management Analyst Series
Administrative Assistant Payroll Supervisor
Administrative Technician Risk Analyst
Budget Analyst Risk Management Coordinator
Executive Assistant I Senior Account Technician
Executive Assistant II Senior Accountant
Human Resources Technician
Human Resources Business Partner
Senior Risk Management Analyst

Page 211 ends

24 2
6 0
4 not be used for the preparation, reproduction, or distribution of notices, nor shall such notices be prepared by City employees during their regular work time. Notices that are posted, distributed or placed in an employee's City mailbox shall not be obscene, defamatory, or of a political nature. All notices to be posted must be dated and signed by an authorized representative of RCCEA. RCCEA agrees to follow the City's E-Mail Policy when sending emails to City employees. RCCEA understands that all electronic mail is not confidential, and that the city reserves the right to access and disclose all messages sent over its email system for any purpose in accordance with the City's E-Mail Policy.

SECTION 50: ACCESS TO WORK LOCATIONS
The parties recognize and agree that in order to maintain good employee relations; it is necessary for Labor Relations Representatives and designated Officers and representatives of RCCEA to confer with Bargaining Unit employees during working hours. Therefore, RCCEA Labor Relations Representatives, Officers or representatives will be granted access to work locations during regular working hours to investigate and process grievances or appeals.

RCCEA Labor Relations Representatives or Officers shall be granted access upon obtaining advance authorization from the designated management representative prior to entering a work location and after advising the City at least one business day in advance of the requested access, of the general nature of the business. The designated management representative may deny access or terminate access to work locations if, in their judgment, it is deemed that the visit would interfere with the efficiency, safety, or security of City operations.

The designated management representative shall not unreasonably withhold timely access to work locations. The City shall ensure that there is at all times someone designated who shall have full authority to approve access. If a request is denied, the designated management representative shall establish a mutually agreeable time for access to the employee. RCCEA Labor Relations Representatives or Officers granted access to work locations shall limit such visits to a reasonable period of time, taking into consideration the nature of the grievance or appeal. The City shall not unreasonably interfere with RCCEA's access right to work locations and any reasonable denial of access shall not be subject to the grievance procedure.

SECTION 51: DUES DEDUCTIONS
RCCEA membership dues shall be deducted by the City from the pay warrant of RCCEA employee per the direction of RCCEA. Remittance of the aggregate amount of all membership dues deducted from the pay warrants of employees covered hereby shall be made to an RCCEA account, provided to the City by RCCEA, on a regular basis consistent with the City’s regular pay periods. RCCEA dues shall be deducted in an amount per bi- weekly pay period authorized by the RCCEA Board of Directors.

A. Separation from Unit
The provisions of this Agreement shall not apply during periods that an employee is in out of paid status for more than thirty (30) days. If an employee is paid for a prior out of paid status his/her representational dues shall be deducted and paid to the Association.

B. Forfeiture of Deductions

Page 212 ends

25 2
6 0
4 If the balance of the employee’s wages, after all other involuntary and insurance premium deductions are made in any one pay period, is not sufficient to pay deductions required by this Agreement, no such deduction shall be made for that period.

C. Maintenance of Membership Clause
Any employee in this unit who has authorized Association dues deductions on the effective date of this memorandum of understanding or at any time subsequent to the effective date of his memorandum of understanding shall continue to have such deductions made by the City until such time that the Association notifies the City to stop collecting dues; provided however, that any employee in the unit may terminate such association dues during the month of November by notifying any association official in writing of his/her termination of Association from which dues deductions are to be canceled. Such notification shall be delivered in person or by U.S mail and should be in the form of a letter containing the following information: employee name, employee number, job classification, department name and name of the Association (Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association – RCCEA). The association will provide the City’s Human Resources Department with the appropriate documentation to process these dues cancellations within ten (10) business days after the close of the withdrawal period. RCCEA shall hold the City harmless for any and all claims, demands, suits, orders, judgements, or other forms of liability that may arise out of or by reason of action taken by the City under this article.

The Association shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless against any and all claims, demands, suits, orders, judgements or other forms of liability that shall arise out of or by reason of, action taken or not taken by the City under this section of the MOU. This includes not only City’s reasonable attorney’s fees and costs but the reasonable cost of management preparation time as well. The City shall notify the Association of such costs on a case-by- case basis.

SECTION 52: NEW EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION – AB119
The City shall provide thirty (30) minutes at a mutually agreeable time during the employee onboarding process for a RCCEA representative to meet with a new RCCEA covered employee and present benefits of being a member of the union. Onboarding of new employees occurs during the first working day at the start of a new pay period up to twenty- six (26) times per year. The City will provide a calendar before the start of a new year. The City will provide RCCEA with at least ten (10) days-notice, or as soon as practical, of onboarding of new RCCEA covered employees. A RCCEA representative will have up to thirty (30) minutes of uninterrupted time to meet with new RCCEA covered employees. Prior to meeting, or in no case later than the meeting time, the City will provide the name and job assignment of the new employee to the RCCEA representative. The City will provide designated RCCEA representatives with all available information about the employee as required under AB119 within thirty (30) days of the employees start date and the City will provide information on all RCCEA covered employees again as required by AB119 at least three (3) times per year.

Page 213 ends

26 2
6 0
4 SECTION 53: USE OF CITY RESOURCES
RCCEA may be granted permission to use any City facilities accessible to the general public for meeting purposes, during the regular hours such space is accessible to the public, provided space for such meetings can be made available without interfering with City needs and is otherwise not reserved by any other groups or individuals. RCCEA may also be permitted to use the City Council Chambers, during regular business hours, for RCCEA meetings, provided the City Council Chambers is not otherwise reserved. Permission to use City facilities must be obtained by RCCEA from the appropriate management representative. RCCEA shall be held fully responsible for any damages to, and the security of, any City facilities that are used by RCCEA.

SECTION 54: ASSOCIATION RELEASE TIME
When RCCEA is formally meeting and conferring with representatives of the City on matters within the scope of representation during regular City business hours, a reasonable number of Officers or other representatives of the RCCEA shall be allowed reasonable time off without loss of compensation or other benefits.

1. Such Officers and representatives shall not leave their duty or workstation or assignment without the knowledge of the department head or division manager.

2. Such meetings are subject to scheduling in a manner consistent with operating needs and work schedules.

RCCEA Officers or representatives shall be permitted, if requested by an RCCEA represented employe e, to attend an employee counseling session, which could result in disciplinary action. Such officers or representatives shall also be permitted, if requested by the Association employee, to be present at an employee disciplinary session.

1. Such Officers or representatives shall not leave their duty or workstation or assignment without the knowledge of the department head or division manager.

2. No more than one employee at a time shall be granted release time to represent one employee.

RCCEA Officers or representatives of the Association shall be given reasonable time during work hours to investigate, and process specified grievances or complaints arising out of the application of MOU or personnel rules, upon prior permission from their respective department head or division manager.

During the term of the next MOU, RCCEA Officers and representatives agree to track their Association release time via the payroll system. The City and RCCEA agree to review this usage to determine if limits need to be incorporated into a subsequent MOU.

Page 214 ends

27 2
6 0
4 SECTION 55: RELEASE TIME FOR ALL HANDS MEETING
RCCEA shall be allowed four (4) ninety (90) minute periods of release time for all hands meetings per fiscal year, including travel time, during work hours. For the purposes of labor negotiations with the City additional meetings may be requested and may be granted by the Human Resources Director.

SECTION 56: LABOR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE
The City and RCCEA agree to implement quarterly labor/management committee (LMC) meetings to discuss employee relations issues. The LMC will not be authorized to change the MOU or to settle any grievance
SECTION 57: PRIORITY OF MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
This memorandum of understanding between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association shall take precedent over the Personnel Rules adopted per Resolution 13-065.

SECTION 58: ADOPTION OF MOU
This memorandum, between the City and the Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association (RCCEA) representing the Supervisory Professional and General Employee bargaining units, was adopted on June 15, 2022.

Page 215 ends

28 2
6 0
4 City of Rancho Cucamonga: Rancho Cucamonga City Employees Association:

Date_______________ Date_______________ _________________________ ____________________________ John R. Gillison Mary LaPlante City Manager Managing Labor Representative _________________________ _____________________________ Lori Sassoon Andy Miller Deputy City Manager Maintenance Supervisor _________________________ _____________________________ Robert Neiuber Rudy Linares Human Resources Director Supervising Public Works Inspector _________________________ _____________________________ Jenifer Phillips Crystal Zuniga Deputy Director of HR Community Services Coordinator _________________________ _____________________________ Noah Daniels Jessica Nuci Finance Director Administrative Assistant

Page 216 ends

Minimum Control Point Maximum
Class Title Step Amount Step Amount Step Amount
Account Clerk 4375 $3,194 4415 $3,900 4435 $4,308
Account Technician 4423 $4,057 4463 $4,952 4483 $5,473
Accountant# 3465 $5,004 3505 $6,108 3525 $6,748
Accounts Payable Supervisor# 3470 $5,129 3510 $6,261 3530 $6,919 Administrative Assistant 4369 $3,099 4409 $3,783 4429 $4,181 Administrative Technician 4437 $4,352 4477 $5,312 4497 $5,868 Animal Behavior Specialist 4388 $3,407 4428 $4,160 4448 $4,597 Animal Care Attendant 4349 $2,806 4389 $3,425 4409 $3,783 Animal Care Supervisor# 3440 $4,417 3480 $5,390 3500 $5,956 Animal Caretaker 4378 $3,243 4418 $3,957 4438 $4,372
Animal Rescue Specialist 4388 $3,407 4428 $4,160 4448 $4,597 Animal Services Dispatcher 4369 $3,099 4409 $3,783 4429 $4,181 Animal Services Officer I 4421 $4,018 4461 $4,904 4481 $5,419 Animal Services Officer II 4441 $4,438 4481 $5,419 4501 $5,987 Artistic Producer - Mainstreet Theatre
Company
4450 $4,643 4490 $5,667 4510 $6,261
Assistant Engineer# 3488 $5,609 3528 $6,848 3548 $7,568 Assistant Planner# 3468 $5,079 3508 $6,200 3528 $6,848
Associate Engineer# 3518 $6,516 3558 $7,954 3578 $8,789 Associate Planner# 3487 $5,583 3527 $6,817 3547 $7,530
Box Office Coordinator 4450 $4,643 4490 $5,667 4510 $6,261 Budget Analyst# 3515 $6,419 3555 $7,835 3575 $8,657
Building Inspection Supervisor#2 3504 $6,076 3544 $7,418 3564 $8,197 Building Inspector I2 4444 $4,504 4484 $5,499 4504 $6,076 Building Inspector II2 4464 $4,977 4504 $6,076 4524 $6,714 Business License Clerk 4378 $3,243 4418 $3,957 4438 $4,372 Business License Inspector 4418 $3,957 4458 $4,831 4478 $5,338 Business License Program Coordinator# 3432 $4,245 3472 $5,179 3492 $5,723 Business License Program Supervisor# 3470 $5,129 3510 $6,261 3530 $6,919 Business License Technician 4408 $3,766 4448 $4,597 4468 $5,079 City Clerk Records Management Analyst# 3470 $5,129 3510 $6,261 3530 $6,919 Community Affairs Coordinator 4450 $4,643 4490 $5,667 4510 $6,261 Community Affairs Officer# 3515 $6,419 3555 $7,835 3575 $8,657 Community Affairs Senior Coordinator# 3480 $5,390 3520 $6,582 3540 $7,272 Community Affairs Specialist 4350 $2,818 4390 $3,441 4410 $3,803 Community Affairs Technician 4437 $4,352 4477 $5,312 4497 $5,868 Community Development Technician I 4413 $3,858 4453 $4,712 4473 $5,207 Community Development Technician II 4423 $4,057 4463 $4,952 4483 $5,473 Monthly Pay Ranges Effective July 4, 2022
Resolution No. 2022-

SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS

ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES

RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE
ATTACHMENT 3

Page 217 ends

Minimum Control Point Maximum
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective July 4, 2022
Resolution No. 2022-

SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS

ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES

RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE
Community Improvement Supervisor#2 3504 $6,076 3544 $7,418 3564 $8,197 Community Improvement Officer I 4421 $4,018 4461 $4,904 4481 $5,419 Community Improvement Officer II 4441 $4,438 4481 $5,419 4501 $5,987 Community Programs Coordinator 4450 $4,643 4490 $5,667 4510 $6,261 Community Programs Specialist 4437 $4,352 4477 $5,312 4497 $5,868 Community Services Coordinator 4450 $4,643 4490 $5,667 4510 $6,261 Community Services Project Coordinator# 3500 $5,956 3540 $7,272 3560 $8,033 Community Services Specialist 4350 $2,818 4390 $3,441 4410 $3,803 Community Services Supervisor# 3480 $5,390 3520 $6,582 3540 $7,272 Community Services Technician 4437 $4,352 4477 $5,312 4497 $5,868 Community Theater Producer 4450 $4,643 4490 $5,667 4510 $6,261 Customer Care Assistant 4349 $2,806 4409 $3,783 4429 $4,181 Customer Service Representative 4378 $3,243 4418 $3,957 4438 $4,372 Customer Service Specialist I - Utilities 4413 $3,858 4453 $4,712 4473 $5,207 Customer Service Specialist II - Utilities 4423 $4,057 4463 $4,952 4483 $5,473 Customer Service Specialist III - Utilities 4443 $4,482 4483 $5,473 4503 $6,046 Deputy City Clerk# 3430 $4,201 3470 $5,129 3490 $5,667
Engineering Aide 4421 $4,018 4461 $4,904 4481 $5,419
Engineering Technician 4441 $4,438 4481 $5,419 4501 $5,987 Environmental Programs Coordinator# 3503 $6,046 3543 $7,382 3563 $8,156 Environmental Programs Inspector2 4464 $4,977 4504 $6,076 4524 $6,714 Event & Rental Services Coordinator 4450 $4,643 4490 $5,667 4510 $6,261 Executive Assistant II# 3444 $4,504 3484 $5,499 3504 $6,076 Executive Assistant1 4394 $3,511 4464 $4,977 4484 $5,499 Fleet Supervisor#2 3488 $5,609 3528 $6,848 3548 $7,568
Front of House Coordinator 4450 $4,643 4490 $5,667 4510 $6,261 Fund Development Coordinator# 3470 $5,129 3510 $6,261 3530 $6,919 GIS Analyst# 3505 $6,108 3545 $7,546 3565 $8,236
GIS Specialist 4456 $4,784 4496 $5,839 4516 $6,452
GIS Supervisor# 3535 $7,094 3575 $8,657 3595 $9,566
GIS Technician 4436 $4,328 4476 $5,284 4496 $5,839
Human Resources Business Partner# 3433 $4,264 3473 $5,207 3493 $5,754 Human Resources Clerk 4389 $3,425 4429 $4,181 4449 $4,619 Human Resources Technician 4408 $3,766 4448 $4,597 4468 $5,079 Information Technology Analyst I# 3505 $6,108 3545 $7,456 3565 $8,236 Information Technology Analyst II# 3520 $6,582 3560 $8,033 3580 $8,874 Information Technology Specialist I 4456 $4,784 4496 $5,839 4516 $6,452 Information Technology Specialist II 4471 $5,155 4511 $6,292 4531 $6,953 ATTACHMENT 3

Page 218 ends

Minimum Control Point Maximum
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective July 4, 2022
Resolution No. 2022-

SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS

ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES

RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE
Information Technology Operations Supvr.# 3535 $7,094 3575 $8,657 3595 $9,566 Information Technology Technician 4411 $3,821 4451 $4,664 4471 $5,155 Lead Park Ranger 4421 $4,018 4461 $4,904 4481 $5,419
Librarian I# 3435 $4,308 3475 $5,259 3495 $5,810
Librarian II# 3457 $4,807 3497 $5,868 3517 $6,485
Library Assistant I 3373 $3,160 3413 $3,858 3433 $4,264 Library Assistant II# 3414 $3,880 3454 $4,736 3474 $5,232 Library Clerk 4356 $2,905 4396 $3,546 4416 $3,917
Library Technician 4393 $3,493 4433 $4,264 4453 $4,712
Maintenance Supervisor#2 3488 $5,609 3528 $6,848 3548 $7,568 Management Aide 4440 $4,417 4480 $5,390 4500 $5,956
Management Analyst I# 3470 $5,129 3510 $6,261 3530 $6,919 Management Analyst II# 3498 $5,898 3538 $7,201 3558 $7,954 Management Analyst III# 3515 $6,419 3555 $7,835 3575 $8,657 Office Services Clerk 4369 $3,099 4409 $3,783 4429 $4,181 Patron & Events Supervisor# 3480 $5,390 3520 $6,582 3540 $7,272 Payroll Supervisor# 3470 $5,129 3510 $6,261 3530 $6,919 Planning Specialist 4443 $4,482 4483 $5,473 4503 $6,046 Planning Technician 4423 $4,057 4463 $4,952 4483 $5,473 Plans Examiner I 4474 $5,232 4514 $6,388 4534 $7,058
Plans Examiner II# 3488 $5,609 3528 $6,848 3548 $7,568
Procurement & Contracts Analyst# 3433 $4,264 3473 $5,207 3493 $5,754 Procurement Clerk 4374 $3,179 4414 $3,880 4434 $4,287
Procurement Technician 4411 $3,821 4451 $4,664 4471 $5,155 Public Services Technician I 4413 $3,858 4453 $4,712 4473 $5,207 Public Services Technician II 4423 $4,057 4463 $4,952 4483 $5,473 Public Services Technician III 4443 $4,482 4483 $5,473 4503 $6,046 Public Works Inspector I2 4444 $4,504 4484 $5,499 4504 $6,076 Public Works Inspector II2 4464 $4,977 4504 $6,076 4524 $6,714 Public Works Safety Coordinator #2 3468 $5,079 3508 $6,200 3528 $6,848 Records Clerk 4358 $2,933 4398 $3,581 4418 $3,957
Records Coordinator 4386 $3,372 4426 $4,119 4446 $4,550 Risk Management Coordinator# 3470 $5,129 3510 $6,261 3530 $6,919 Senior Account Clerk 4395 $3,529 4435 $4,308 4455 $4,759 Senior Account Technician 4446 $4,550 4486 $5,556 4506 $6,139 Senior Accountant# 3498 $5,898 3538 $7,201 3558 $7,954
Senior Animal Care Supervisor# 3461 $4,904 3501 $5,987 3521 $6,615 Senior Animal Services Officer# 3461 $4,904 3501 $5,987 3521 $6,615 ATTACHMENT 3

Page 219 ends

Minimum Control Point Maximum
Monthly Pay Ranges Effective July 4, 2022
Resolution No. 2022-

SUPERVISORY/PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL EMPLOYEES GROUPS

ASSIGNMENTS OF CLASSIFICATIONS TO PAY RANGES

RCCEA COVERED EMPLOYEES IN THE
Senior Building Inspector#2 3484 $5,499 3524 $6,714 3544 $7,418 Senior Business License Clerk 4398 $3,581 4438 $4,372 4458 $4,831 Senior Community Improvement Officer# 3461 $4,904 3501 $5,987 3521 $6,615 Senior Electrician # 3485 $5,528 3525 $6,748 3545 $7,456 Senior GIS Analyst # 3520 $6,582 3560 $8,033 3580 $8,874 Sr Human Resources Business Partner# 3498 $5,898 3538 $7,201 3558 $7,954 Senior Information Technology Analyst# 3535 $7,094 3575 $8,657 3595 $9,566 Senior Information Technology Specialist# 4493 $5,754 4533 $7,024 4553 $7,759 Senior Librarian# 3468 $5,079 3508 $6,200 3528 $6,848
Senior Park Planner# 3500 $5,956 3540 $7,272 3560 $8,033 Senior Plans Examiner# 3503 $6,046 3543 $7,382 3563 $8,156 Senior Procurement Technician# 3463 $4,952 3503 $6,046 3523 $6,681 Senior Risk Management Analyst# 3515 $6,419 3555 $7,835 3575 $8,657 Senior Veterinary Technician# 3461 $4,904 3501 $5,987 3521 $6,615 Special Districts Analyst# 3498 $5,898 3538 $7,201 3558 $7,954 Supervising Public Works Inspector#2 3494 $5,780 3534 $7,058 3554 $7,797 Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist#2 3502 $6,016 3542 $7,345 3562 $8,114 Theater Production Coordinator 4460 $4,880 4500 $5,956 4520 $6,582 Theater Production Supervisor# 3480 $5,390 3520 $6,582 3540 $7,272 Theatre Technician III 4423 $4,057 4463 $4,592 4483 $5,473 Utilities Operation Supervisor# 3515 $6,419 3555 $7,835 3575 $8,657 Utility Marker 4464 $4,977 4504 $6,076 4524 $6,714
Veterinary Assistant 4407 $3,746 4447 $4,574 4467 $5,052 Veterinary Technician 4437 $4,352 4477 $5,312 4497 $5,868

2. Refer to MOU for provision of boot
# Denotes Supervisory/Professional Class

1. When acting as Clerk to Commissions $50 paid per night or weekend day meeting. Compensatory time off ATTACHMENT 3

Page 220 ends

DATE:June 15, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Rob Ball, Fire Marshal
Darci Vogel, Fire Business Manager
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Resolution Confirming Unpaid Weed and Fire Hazard Abatement Fees and Authorizing a Special Assessment on Affected Parcels on the Next Tax Roll. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022-089) (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution confirming unpaid weed and fire hazard abatement fees for calendar year 2021 and authorizing a special assessment of those fees against the associated parcel on the next tax roll.

BACKGROUND:

In 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance 832, which is codified as Chapter 8.46 of the Municipal Code, providing for the removal of seasonal grasses, weeds, and other fire hazards.

The Municipal Code authorizes the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, serving as the City’s fire department, to perform weed and fire hazard abatement on behalf of the City.

In accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code, the Fire District provided notice to abate weeds and fire hazards to the owners of record of undeveloped parcels and provided a completion date for the required abatement work. Owners receiving such notices were advised of their right to object and appeal the order to abate.

Parcels that were not abated by the compliance date were referred to an approved contractor who was authorized to perform the required abatement work by order of the Fire District. The contractor who completed the abatement work provided itemized invoices for the cost of the abatement work for each parcel. In accordance with the terms of the contract between the Fire District and the weed abatement contractor, the invoices from the contractor have been paid with Fire District funds.

Page 221 ends

Page 2 ends

1 3
1 2
Fire District for weed and fire hazard abatement services along with information about the property owner’s right to appeal the amount of the invoice in whole or in part. Written instructions for filing an appeal are included in the Notices. As allowed by Fire District Resolution FD 10-035 and where In 2010, the City Council adopted Ordinance 832, which is codified as Chapter 8.46 of the Municipal Code, providing for the removal of seasonal grasses, weeds, and other fire hazards.

The Municipal Code authorizes the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, serving as the City’s fire department, to perform weed and fire hazard abatement on behalf of the City.

Using the itemized invoices submitted by the contractor, the Fire District prepared a report for the Finance Department that detailed the charges and fees for each parcel where the hazards were abated by the contractor. The Finance Department generated invoices based on the information provided in the report. The Fire District then created Notices of Payment due for the owners of parcels. These Notices included detailed itemization of the charges and fees being billed by the Fire District for weed and fire hazard abatement services along with information about the property owner’s right to appeal the amount of the invoice in whole or in part. Written instructions for filing an appeal are included in the Notices. As allowed by Fire District Resolution FD 10-035 and where applicable, the Fire District included a re-inspection fee and an administrative fee in the Notices of Payment Due.

The report included with this resolution shows, by parcel and invoice number, the total amount of all charges for the work completed by the contractor and Fire District fees that have not been paid in accordance with the terms of the Notice of Payment Due. There are 129 invoices affected by this resolution.

ANALYSIS:

In accordance with the Municipal Code, the City Council must confirm by resolution the unpaid fees in order for the Fire District to make a formal request to the County Assessor for the unpaid invoice to be a special assessment on the parcel and included on the next tax roll. The resolution offered herewith serves that purpose. This legislative action is required each time special tax assessments are sent to the County Assessor. Staff brings this matter to the Council once a year.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The weed and fire hazard abatement program was designed to be cost-neutral by recovering all charges and expenses associated with completing work required to bring non-compliant parcels into compliance with the City’s weed and fire hazard abatement requirements. The resolution offered for consideration places the cost for the necessary work with the property owners whose choice or inaction resulted in the Fire District expending budgeted funds. By using all available means to recover the costs incurred by abating the hazards, the Fire District is ensuring that the weed and fire hazard abatement program will not have a fiscal impact on the City or the Fire District.

Page 222 ends

Page 3 ends

1 3
1 2
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

By ensuring that costs incurred by the Fire District for weed and fire hazard abatement services are paid by the property owners through cost-recovery efforts, the City Council reaffirms its long- standing commitment to fiscal responsibility. With the program being cost-neutral through cost- recovery, weed and fire hazard abatement has long-term sustainability. The wildfire risk and hazard reduction achieved by this program contributes to a high quality of life for all and enhances the safety and health of all members of the community.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2022-089
Attachment 2 – List of Affected Parcels with Assessment Amount

Page 223 ends

Resolution No. 22-xxx Page 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 22-xxx

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA CONFIRMING AN ITEMIZED WRITTEN REPORT SHOWING

THE ACTUAL COSTS OF WEED AND FIRE HAZARD ABATEMENT FOR EACH

SEPARATE PARCEL OF LAND AS REQUIRED BY CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 39574, PROVIDING THAT EACH SUCH COST

OF ABATEMENT SHALL CONSTITUTE A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AGAINST

EACH LISTED PARCEL OF LAND PURSUANT TO CALIFORNIA
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 39577, AND PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF SAID REPORT WITH THE COUNTY ASSESSOR.

WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 39502 authorizes the City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) to adopt an ordinance providing for the removal of grass, weeds, rubbish and other materials that can be dangerous or injurious to neighboring property or the health and welfare of residents in the vicinity and make the cost of removal a lien on the property.

WHEREAS, The City adopted Ordinance 832, which is codified as Chapter 8.46 of the Municipal Code providing for the removal of grass, weeds, etc. as allowed by the Government Code.

WHEREAS, Chapter 8.46 of the Municipal Code authorizes the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (District), serving as the City’s fire department, to perform weed and fire hazard abatement on behalf of the City.

WHEREAS, The District provided notice to abate weeds and fire hazards to the owners of record of unimproved parcels and provided a completion date for the required abatement, all as required by law.

Owners receiving such notice were advised of their right to object and appeal the order to abate.

WHEREAS, Parcels not abated by the completion date were referred to approved contractors to perform the required abatement work, by order of the District.

WHEREAS, The District was provided with itemized billings for the cost of abatement for each parcel by the abatement contractors. Using the itemized contractors’ billings, the District prepared an itemized, written report setting forth all abatement costs for each affected parcel, as required by California Government Code Section 39574 (written report). Prior to the adoption of this Resolution, the District billed the owners of record of the affected parcels listed in the written report for the cost of abatement, plus approved administrative fees as authorized by Government Code Section 39573 and District’s fee resolution (collectively, costs of abatement). Owners receiving such billings were advised of their right to object and appeal the amount of the bill. None of the costs or fees set forth in the written report have been paid, nor are any the subject of a pending appeal.

WHEREAS, Attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated by reference herein, are the written reports required by California Government Code Section 39574, setting forth a true and correct list of parcels with unpaid weed abatement costs and fees, and the amount of all costs of abatement for each parcel for calendar year 2021. Exhibit A consists of two sheets – one for the unpaid weed abatement

Page 224 ends

Resolution No. 22-xxx Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT 1 costs and fees for the spring abatements and one for the unpaid weed abatement costs and fees for the fall abatements.

WHEREAS, All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, HEREBY FINDS AND RESOLVES:

1.All costs of abatement set forth in Exhibit A are reasonable and do not exceed the actual costs to the City or District in providing abatement services. Based thereon, the City Council hereby confirms all costs set forth in the written report, Exhibit A hereto.

2.All costs of abatement for each parcel of land listed in Exhibit A shall constitute a special assessment and lien against that parcel of land, as authorized by California Government Code Section 39577 and Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code Chapter 8.46.

3.The Fire Chief is hereby directed to deliver a certified copy of this Resolution, including Exhibit A hereto, to the San Bernardino County Assessor whereupon all costs of abatement set forth in Exhibit A shall constitute an assessment against each listed parcel as part of the County’s tax assessments, and shall be made part of the tax rolls, all in accordance with California Government Code Sections 39578, 39579, 39580, and 39583 and any other provision of law applicable thereto. Thereafter, a lien shall attach against each such parcel upon recordation of the order confirming the assessment in the office of the County Recorder.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this day of 2022.

Page 225 ends

CITY INV # APN TOTAL OF ALL FEES
AR130475 20204162 $ 1,912.50
AR130477 20209132 $ 495.00
AR130479 20215102 $ 495.00
AR130480 20216109 $ 540.00
AR130481 20216143 $ 760.00
AR130482 20246161 $ 715.00
AR130483 20246162 $ 585.00
AR130485 20721142 $ 495.00
AR130486 20724121 $ 495.00
AR130488 20726205 $ 495.00
AR130489 20727125 $ 1,415.00
AR130490 20727127 $ 1,900.00
AR130491 20727189 $ 1,550.00
AR130492 20727196 $ 1,370.00
AR130493 20727197 $ 675.00
AR130494 20764105 $ 870.00
AR130495 20764112 $ 685.00
AR130496 20809144 $ 585.00
AR130497 20833108 $ 453.50
AR130498 20833117 $ 781.00
AR130499 20835318 $ 696.00
AR130500 20835508 $ 850.00
AR130501 20835509 $ 715.00
AR130502 20835524 $ 1,025.00
AR130503 20896105 $ 1,065.00
AR130504 20896106 $ 525.00
AR130505 20896107 $ 570.00
AR130507 20901315 $ 540.00
AR130509 20903235 $ 935.00
AR130510 20903257 $ 540.00
AR130511 20906325 $ 495.00
AR130512 20912110 $ 640.00
AR130513 20912226 $ 540.00
AR130514 20912227 $ 640.00
AR130516 20924106 $ 495.00
AR130520 22511108 $ 1,240.00
AR130521 22511109 $ 1,240.00
AR130522 22512283 $ 540.00
AR130523 22512305 $ 670.00
AR130524 22513120 $ 495.00
AR130525 22515217 $ 1,050.00
AR130527 22519109 $ 1,240.00
AR130528 22519117 $ 1,285.00
AR130531 22519136 $ 1,595.00
AR130533 22610203 $ 495.00
AR130534 22610204 $ 495.00
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 226 ends

AR130536 22705131 $ 1,285.00
AR130537 22706157 $ 1,330.00
AR130538 22706173 $ 1,285.00
AR130539 22706174 $ 1,285.00
AR130548 22928350 $ 2,110.00
AR130549 22928351 $ 1,385.00
AR130550 22929154 $ 1,985.00
AR130551 22931114 $ 495.00
AR130552 22931115 $ 1,285.00
AR130553 22945128 $ 2,075.00
AR130554 106117220 $ 540.00
AR130555 106121128 $ 495.00
AR130556 106121129 $ 495.00
AR130557 106169122 $ 495.00
AR130558 106169123 $ 495.00
AR130559 106169124 $ 495.00
AR130560 106169125 $ 495.00
AR130561 106169126 $ 495.00
AR130562 106169127 $ 495.00
AR130564 106180128 $ 640.00
AR130566 107412111 $ 540.00
AR130568 107428108 $ 630.00
AR130569 107428110 $ 940.00
AR130570 107431113 $ 1,145.00
AR130571 107431119 $ 500.00
AR130572 107432111 $ 562.50
AR130573 107436110 $ 517.50
AR130574 107449130 $ 540.00
AR130576 107453114 $ 732.50
AR130577 107454102 $ 732.50
AR130580 107455118 $ 732.50
AR130581 107456127 $ 732.50
AR130582 107456128 $ 732.50
AR130583 107762120 $ 495.00
AR130584 107764145 $ 495.00
AR130585 107764146 $ 495.00
AR130586 108958107 $ 540.00
AR130587 109041101 $ 935.00
AR130588 109060107 $ 517.50
AR130589 109060108 $ 495.00
AR130590 109060121 $ 495.00
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 227 ends

CITY INV # APN TOTAL OF ALL FEES
AR131189 020213161 495.00
AR131190 020215102 495.00
AR131191 020224124 495.00
AR131192 020727194 692.50
AR131193 020727197 692.50
AR131199 020835318 692.50
AR131200 020835406 692.50
AR131201 020835407 692.50
AR131202 020896105 722.50
AR131203 020896106 547.50
AR131204 020896107 867.50
AR131205 020901313 495.00
AR131206 020901344 495.00
AR131207 020902145 495.00
AR131208 020903257 495.00
AR131209 020912110 640.00
AR131211 020919222 495.00
AR131212 020941132 1,217.50
AR131213 021008141 670.00
AR131214 021008142 495.00
AR131215 022511108 1,217.50
AR131216 022511109 1,217.50
AR131217 022512309 935.00
AR131221 022705103 2,160.00
AR131222 022705131 1,065.00
AR131223 022706157 890.00
AR131224 022706173 1,240.00
AR131225 022706174 1,065.00
AR131227 022917108 960.00
AR131228 022928350 890.00
AR131229 022928351 890.00
AR131230 022931114 495.00
AR131231 022931115 1,240.00
AR131232 022934116 495.00
AR131233 022945128 692.50
AR131237 107405103 2,360.00
AR131239 107423105 495.00
AR131240 107433107 892.50
AR131241 107449130 495.00
AR131243 107707111 495.00
AR131244 108958107 595.00
AR131246 110017110 495.00
ATTACHMENT 2

Page 228 ends

DATE:June 15, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Jin Kim, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Allocating Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Program Funds for Fiscal Year 2022/23. (RESOLUTION NO. 2022-090) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution to allocate RMRA Program funds for Fiscal Year 2022/23 for the completion of the projects listed in the FY2022/23 Capital Improvement Program.

BACKGROUND:

On April 28, 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill SB1, the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 creating the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program in order to address deferred maintenance on the State highway and local street and road systems. Funds made available by the program are required to be utilized for basic road maintenance and rehabilitation projects and on critical safety projects. Prior to receiving an apportionment of funds under the program in a fiscal year, the City must submit a list of proposed projects to the California Transportation Commission (CTC), and the funding must be allocated by resolution.

ANALYSIS:

The guidelines and regulations for obtaining funds from the program have been previously amended by the CTC requiring local agencies to adopt their project list by resolution; submission of a project list adopted through the city budget is no longer acceptable. The CTC has announced the deadline of July 1, 2022, for local agencies to submit their adopted project list by resolution for the upcoming fiscal year.

On that basis, staff recommends the following projects which are planned for consideration in the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Capital Improvement Program for funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (Fund 179):

1. Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation - Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue

2. Base Line Road Pavement Rehabilitation - Day Creek Avenue to Forester Place FISCAL IMPACT:

Revenue for the RMRA is currently estimated to be $4,061,830 in the Fiscal Year 2022/23 Budget.

Staff will continue to monitor revenue estimates and receipts to ensure adequate funding will be available to cover budgeted project costs and will adjust the planned improvements listed above accordingly.

Page 229 ends

Page 2 ends

1 3
1 5
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council's vision for the City by ensuring the completion of projects that continue to improve our roads which helps us maintain our success as a world class community.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Resolution No. 2022-090

Page 230 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-XXX

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE PROJECTS

FOR THE ROAD MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION PROGRAM
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022/23 FOR THE EXPENDITURE OF ROAD

MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA) FUNDS
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 1 (SB1), the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (Chapter 5, Statues of 2017) was passed by the Legislature and Signed into law by the Governor in April 2017 to address the significant multi-modal transportation funding shortfalls statewide; WHEREAS, SB1 includes accountability and transparency provisions that will ensure the residents of our City are aware of the projects proposed for funding in our community and which projects have been completed each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the City must adopt by resolution a list of projects proposed to receive fiscal year funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), created by SB1, which must include a description and the location of each proposed project, a proposed schedule for the project's completion, and the estimated useful life of the improvement; and WHEREAS, the City, will receive an estimated $4,061,830 in RMRA funding in Fiscal Year 2022/23 from SB1; and
WHEREAS, this is the sixth year in which the City is receiving SB1 funding and will enable the City to continue essential road maintenance and rehabilitation projects, safety improvements, repairing and replacing aging bridges, and increasing access and mobility options for the traveling public that would not have otherwise been possible without SB1; and
WHEREAS, the City used a Pavement Management System to develop the SB1 project list to ensure revenues are being used on the most high-priority and cost-effective projects that also meet the community's priorities for transportation investment; and WHEREAS, the funding from SB1 will help the City maintain and rehabilitate two (2) major arterial roadways in the City this year and similar projects into the future; and WHEREAS, the 2018 California Statewide Local Streets and Roads Needs Assessment found that the City's streets and roads are in good condition and this revenue will help us increase the overall quality of our road system and over the next decade will maintain our streets and roads in a good condition; and WHEREAS, the SB1 project list and overall investment in our local streets and roads infrastructure with a focus on basic maintenance and safety, investing in complete streets infrastructure, and using cutting-edge technology, materials and practices, will have significant positive co-benefits statewide.

Page 231 ends

Resolution No. 2022-XXX - Page 2 of 3
NOW, THEREFORE IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, ORDERED AND FOUND by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California, as follows:

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct.

2. The following list of proposed projects will be funded in-part or solely with Fiscal Year 2022/23 Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account revenues:

Project 1: Banyan Street Pavement Rehabilitation – Haven Avenue to Milliken Avenue (JL 2033):

This project includes cold planing, localized asphalt removal and replacement, crack sealing, asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, ADA ramp upgrades, traffic signal video detection, thermoplastic green bike lane, utility adjustments and pavement striping for approximately 1 mile of roadway. The estimated useful life of this roadway is 20 years and construction is anticipated to start in March 2023.

Project 2: Base Line Road Pavement Rehabilitation – Day Creek Avenue to Forester Place (JL 2097):

The estimated useful life of this roadway is 20 years and construction is anticipated to start in October 2022.

Page 232 ends

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 15th day of June 2022. ____________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )
I, Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, at a Regular Meeting of said Council held on the 15th day of June 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

Executed this 15th day of June, 2022, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ____________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk

Page 233 ends

DATE:June 15, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director SUBJECT: Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Calling and Giving Notice of November 8, 2022, General Municipal Election and Requesting its Consolidation with the General Statewide Election, a Resolution Declaring the City Council’s Decision to Fill the Vacancy in City Council District 1 by Special Election and Calling and Giving Notice of Such Special Municipal Election on November 8, 2022, and Requesting its Consolidation with the General Statewide Election and Regular Municipal Election, and a Resolution Adopting Regulations Pertaining to Candidate Statements. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022-071, 2022-072 AND 2022-073) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council adopt the following Resolutions pertaining to the November 8, 2022, election:

1. Resolution No. 2022-071, Calling and Giving Notice of the Holding of a General Municipal Election on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the Election of Certain Officers and Requesting the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino to Consolidate the General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election to be held Pursuant to Elections Code Section 10403 Relating to General Law Cities;

2. Resolution No. 2022-072, Calling and Giving Notice of the Holding of a Special Municipal Election to Be Held in Said City on Tuesday the 8th day of November 2022, for the Election of a Member of the City Council, District 1, to Fill the Vacancy as Required by the Provisions of the Laws of the State of California Relating to General Law Cities, and Consolidating Said Election with the General Election to be Held on Same Date;

3. Resolution No. 2022-073, Adopting Regulations for Candidates for Elective Office Pertaining to Candidate Statements Submitted to The Voters for the November 8, 2022, Election.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Rancho Cucamonga is a General Law City and General Municipal Elections are governed by the State of California Government and Election Codes. The City’s General Municipal Elections are held on the same date as statewide elections and consolidated with those statewide elections upon request to the County Board of Supervisors.

Page 234 ends

Page 2 ends

1 3
5 9
In addition, on June 1, 2022, the City Council gave direction to fill the vacancy in Council District 1 by calling for a special election to be held on November 8, 2022. The person elected to fill this vacancy will serve the remainder of an unexpired term through November 2024. The Special Municipal Election is requested to be consolidated with the Regular Municipal Election.

ANALYSIS:

The City of Rancho Cucamonga is scheduled to conduct a General Municipal Election on November 8, 2022, to elect one (1) Member of the City Council from District 2; one (1) Member of the City Council from District 3; and one (1) Mayor elected at large, each for the full term of four years. The Resolution calling and giving notice of the November 8, 2022, election, requesting consolidation and determining tie-votes by lot is attached for consideration.

On June 1, 2022, the City Council determined that a special election would be called to fill the vacancy for District 1 on the City Council. Since the special election to fill the vacancy must be held on the “next regularly established election date” that falls on or after the 114th day from the date the special election is called, the special election will have to take place on the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November, which is November 8, 2022. Attached is the Resolution calling for a Special Election on November 8, 2022, for the eligible voters of District 1 to vote for who they want to fill the unexpired term, which expires in November 2024.

Also attached is a Resolution establishing regulations for candidates for elective office pertaining to candidate statements submitted to the voters. Only candidates wishing to submit a candidate statement will be required to pay a deposit to cover the cost of printing the statement in the sample ballots.

The nomination period begins on Monday, July 18, 2022, and will close on Friday, August 12, 2022, at 5:00 p.m. If an incumbent does not file, the period is extended to Wednesday, August 17, 2022, for candidates other than the incumbent to file for that office.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Sufficient funds have been included in the proposed FY 2022-2023 budget.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUES(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s Mission to ensure and advance the quality of life for the community through inclusive decision making through the municipal election process.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution No. 2022-071
Attachment 2 – Resolution No. 2022-072
Attachment 3 – Resolution No. 2022-073

Page 235 ends

Resolution No. 2022-071 - Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-071

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE C I T Y OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING

NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, FOR THE

ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AND REQUESTING THE

BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN

BERNARDINO TO CONSOLIDATE THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL

ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO
BE HELD PURSUANT TO ELECTIONS CODE SECTION 10403

RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of California, a General Municipal Election shall be held on November 8, 2022, for the election of municipal officers; and
WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election be consolidated with the Statewide General Election to be held on the same date and that within the city, the precincts, polling places, and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the County Election Department of the County of San Bernardino canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election and that the election be held on all respects as if there were only one election; and

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, a General Municipal Election for the purpose of electing one (1) Member of the City Council from District 2; one (1) Member of the City Council from District 3; one (1) Mayor elected at large, each for the full term of four years.

SECTION 2. The ballots to be used at the election shall be in the form and content as required by the law.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter, and all supplies, equipment, and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election.

SECTION 4. The polls for the election shall be open at seven o’clock a.m. on the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until eight o’clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14401 of the elections code.

SECTION 5. In all particulars not recited in this Resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections.

Page 236 ends

Resolution No. 2022-071 - Page 2 of 3
SECTION 6. That pursuant to the requirements of Section 10403 of the Elections Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Bernardino is hereby requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General Municipal Election with the Statewide General Election on Tuesday, November 8, 2022, for the purpose of electing one (1) Member of the City Council from District 2; one (1) Member of the City Council from District 3; one (1) Mayor elected at large, each for the full term of four years. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2022-072, the City Council has also requested the consolidation of this General Municipal Election with a Special Municipal Election called for the purpose of filling a vacancy in the remaining term of office for City Council District 1.

SECTION 7. The County Registrar of Voters is authorized to canvass the returns of the Regular Municipal Election. The election shall be held in all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election.

SECTION 8. The Board of Supervisors is requested to issue instructions to the County Registrar of Voters to take any and all steps necessary for the holding of the consolidated election.

SECTION 9. The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall reimburse the County of San Bernardino for services performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the City of a properly approved bill.

SECTION 10. Notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk is authorized, instructed, and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law. Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, the City Clerk is hereby instructed to act in conformance with California Elections Code Section 10403 and to file this Resolution with the Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County and to transmit a copy of the same to the San Bernardino County elections official.

SECTION 11. That in the event of a tie vote (if any two or more persons receive an equal and the highest number of votes for an office) as certified by the Election Official, the City Council, in accordance with Elections Code §15651 (a) shall set a date and time and place and summon the candidates who have received the tie votes to appear and will determine the tie by lot.

SECTION 12. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the Book of original Resolutions.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June 2022.

______________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk

Page 237 ends

Resolution No. 2022-071 - Page 3 of 3

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

Executed this 16th day of June, 2022, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ______________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk

Page 238 ends

Resolution No. 2022-072 - Page 1 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-072

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING

NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, TO FILL A
VACANCY ON THE CITY COUNCIL, DISTRICT 1, AND

CONSOLIDATING THE ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE

GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE SAME DAY
WHEREAS, Council Member Sam Spagnolo was elected to a four-year term to represent City Council District 1 on November 3, 2020; and
WHEREAS, a vacancy in the office of Member of the City Council, District 1, was created as a result of the passing of the member on May 2, 2022; and WHEREAS, the term of office in which the vacancy occurs ends in November 2024; and WHEREAS, on June 1, 2022, pursuant to Government Code Section 36512, the City Council provided direction to fill the vacancy in City Council District 1 by calling a special election to fill the remaining term of office; and
WHEREAS, the special election to fill the vacancy must take place at the next regularly established election date that is not less than 114 days from the call of the special election; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Elections Code Section 1000, the next established election date that is not less than 114 days from the call of the special election made pursuant to this Resolution is November 8, 2022; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 2022-071, the City Council has called and given notice of a General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 2022, for the purpose of electing two members of the City Council and the office of Mayor.

WHEREAS, it is desirable that the special election be consolidated with the statewide general election to be held on November 8, 2022, and that within the City of Rancho Cucamonga, the precincts, polling places, and election officers of the two elections be the same, and that the San Bernardino Registrar of Voters canvass the returns of the special election and that the election be held in all respects as if there were only one election; and NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga does hereby resolve, declare, determine and order as follows:

SECTION 1. After due consideration, and pursuant to applicable law, the City Council hereby determines that the vacancy in City Council District 1 shall be filled by the election of a replacement at a Special Municipal Election.

SECTION 2.That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the state of California relating to General Law Cities, there is hereby called and ordered to be held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, County of San Bernardino, State of California, on Tuesday, the 8 th day of November 2022, a Special Municipal Election of the qualified electors of District 1 of the City of

Page 239 ends

Resolution No. 2022-072 - Page 2 of 3
Rancho Cucamonga for the purpose of electing one Member of the City Council representing District 1 for the unexpired term of Sam Spagnolo, which expires in November 2024.

SECTION 3.Candidates seeking election to fill the vacancy at the Special Municipal Election shall be nominated separately from candidates seeking election to full terms on the City Council, and the Special Municipal Election shall appear separately on the ballot.

SECTION 4. That the Special Municipal Election hereby called for the date hereinbefore specified shall be and is hereby ordered consolidated with the General Municipal Election to be held on November 8, 2022. The proceedings, polling places, precincts, precinct board members and officers for the Special Municipal Election shall be the same as those provided for said election. The Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County is hereby requested to order the consolidation of the Special Municipal Election hereby called with said General Municipal Election, and the San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters is hereby authorized to canvass the returns of said Special Municipal Election. Said Registrar of Voters shall supervise the canvass of said returns for said General Municipal Election and Special Municipal Election and transmit said returns to the City Council of said City which shall thereafter declare the results thereof.

SECTION 5. The City of Rancho Cucamonga shall reimburse the County of San Bernardino for services performed when the work is completed and upon presentation to the City of a properly approved bill.

SECTION 6: The City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga is directed to forward, without delay, to the San Bernardino County Registrar of Voters, a certified copy of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15th day of June 2022. ______________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk

Page 240 ends

Resolution No. 2022-072 - Page 3 of 3

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

Executed this 16th day of June, 2022, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ______________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk

Page 241 ends

Resolution No. 2022-073 – Page 1 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-073

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING

REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE

PERTAINING TO CANDIDATE STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO
THE VOTERS FOR THE NOVEMBER 8, 2022 ELECTION.

WHEREAS, Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California provides that the governing body of any city may adopt a charge against candidates pertaining to materials prepared by any candidate for the municipal election, including costs of the candidates’ statement.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. General Provisions. That pursuant to Section 13307 of the Elections Code of the State of California, each candidate for elective office to be voted for at the General Municipal Election to be held in the City of Rancho Cucamonga on November 8, 2022, may prepare a candidate statement on an appropriate form provided by the City Clerk. Such statement may include the candidate’s name, age, and occupation and a brief description of no more than 200 words of the candidate’s education and qualifications expressed by the candidate. Such statement shall not include the party affiliation of the candidate nor membership or activity in partisan political organizations. Such statement shall be filed in the Office of the City Clerk at the time the candidate’s nomination papers are filed. Such statement may be withdrawn, but not changed, during the period for filing nomination papers and until 5:00 p.m. of the next working day after the close of the nomination period.

SECTION 2: Additional Materials. No candidate will be permitted to include additional materials in the voter information guide.

SECTION 3.FOREIGN LANGUAGE POLICY. Pursuant to the Federal Voting Rights Act, candidate statements will be translated into all languages required by the County of San Bernardino.

The County will mail separate sample ballots and candidate statements in the required languages to only those voters who are on the county voter file as having requested a sample ballot in a particular language. The County will make the sample ballots and candidates’ statements in the required languages available at all polling places, on the County’s website, and in the Election Official’s office.

SECTION 4.Payment. The City Clerk shall estimate the total cost of printing, handling, translating, and mailing the candidate’s statements filed pursuant to the Elections Code, including costs incurred as a result of complying with the Voting Rights Act of 1965 (as amended), and require each candidate filing a statement to pay in advance their pro-rata share as a condition of having their statement included in the voter’s pamphlet. The estimate is just an approximation of the actual cost that varies from one election to another election and may be significantly more or less than the estimate, depending upon the actual number of candidates filing statements. Accordingly, the Clerk is not bound by the estimate and may, on a pro-rata basis, bill the candidate for additional actual expense or refund any excess paid depending on the final cost. In the event of underpayment, the Clerk may require the candidate to pay the

Page 242 ends

Resolution No. 2022-073 – Page 2 of 2
balance of the cost incurred. In the event of overpayment, the Clerk shall prorate the excess amount among the candidates and refund the excess amount paid.

SECTION 5. That the City Clerk shall provide each candidate or the candidate’s representative a copy of this Resolution at the time nominating petitions are issued.

SECTION 6. All previous Resolutions establishing Council policy on payment for candidates' statements are repealed.

SECTION 7. This Resolution shall apply only to the election to be held on November 8, 2022, and shall then be repealed.

PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 15 day of June 2022. ______________________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor

ATTEST:
_________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

Executed this 16th day of June, 2022, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. ______________________________________
Janice C. Reynolds, City Clerk

Page 243 ends

DATE:June 15, 2022
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Noah Daniels, Finance Director
SUBJECT: Consideration of Approval of Resolutions for the Landscape Maintenance Districts, Street Lighting Maintenance Districts, and Park and Recreation Improvement District as follows: (1) Resolutions Ordering the Preparation of the Annual Engineer's Reports; (2) Resolutions Approving the Preliminary Annual Engineer's Reports; (3) Resolutions of Intention to Levy Annual Assessments and Sets the Time and Place for a Public Hearing for Each. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2022-079, 2022-080, 2022-081, 2022-082, 2022-083, 2022-084, 2022-085, 2022-086 AND 2022-087) (CITY) RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended that the City Council take the following actions for Landscape Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3B, 4-R, 5, 6-R, 7, 8, 9 ("LMD"), and 10; Street Lighting Maintenance District Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 ("SLD"); and Park and Recreation Improvement District No. PD-85 (PD-85) (collectively, the "Districts" ):

1. Adopt Resolutions Ordering the Preparation of the Annual Engineer's Reports;

2. Adopt Resolutions Approving the Preliminary Annual Engineer's Reports;

3. Adopt Resolutions of Intention to Levy Annual Assessments and Sets a Public Hearing for July 20, 2022.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Rancho Cucamonga administers the Districts, including setting the assessment rates paid by property owners. Property owners pay these annual assessments through their property tax bills for the maintenance and operations of parks, landscaping, and street lights within their communities.

To set the assessment rates for the upcoming fiscal year, the City Council levies the assessment and reconfirms the Districts by a series of resolutions and a public hearing. The process, which is set by the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (the "1972 Act"), includes the following steps for the Districts:

1. City Council orders the preparation of the Annual Engineer's Report;

2. City Council accepts the preliminary Annual Engineer's Report;

3. City Council declares their intention to levy annual assessments and sets the time and place for a public hearing; and

4. City Council conducts a public hearing and takes action to confirm the Districts and levy assessments for the upcoming fiscal year.

Page 244 ends

Page 2 ends

1 3
1 9
The 1972 Act requires the City Council to order and accept the preliminary Annual Engineer's Reports. However, approval of the Annual Engineer's Reports and levy of annual assessments are not final until after the City Council conducts a public hearing on July 20, 2022, at 7:00 p.m.

After conducting the public hearing, the City Council may adopt a resolution confirming the levy of assessments as recommended. Upon final adoption, the Districts will be reconfirmed for the upcoming fiscal year. The assessment will be posted to the County of San Bernardino tax rolls before the deadline in August. These assessments will appear as a separate item on the property tax bill for each parcel.

The recommended rates were developed during the Fiscal Year 2022/23 budget process and are included in the budgeted revenues for each District.

ANALYSIS:

Each District has specific and unique improvements based on its boundaries and the community.

Additionally, each District's assessment rate cannot exceed its maximum allowable assessment rate to comply with state law. On an annual basis, City staff performs financial analysis for each District to determine the recommended rates to the City Council that meet the current operations and future capital replacement needs for each District.

The table below provides the maximum assessment rate, the current Fiscal Year 2021/22 assessment rate, and the recommended the Fiscal Year 2022/23 rate based on the analysis performed during the budget process for the Districts:

District / Name Maximum
Fiscal Year
2021/22
Fiscal Year
2022/23 Notes
LMD 1
(General City)
$92.21 $92.21 $92.21 A rate increase would require
voter approval.

LMD 2
(Victoria
Neighborhood
Parks)
$562.85 $503.80 $518.88 3.0% increase to reflect
planned future capital
projects.

LMD 3B
(Commercial
Industrial)
$352.80 $282.24 $282.24 No change recommended.

LMD 4-R
(Terra Vista Planned
Community)
$499.32 $397.15 $397.15 No change recommended.

LMD 5
(Andover)
$113.29 $56.65 $56.65 No change recommended.

LMD 6-R
(Caryn Planned
Community)
$475.93 $462.07 $475.93 3.0% increase to reflect an
increase in operational costs.

LMD 7
(North Etiwanda)
$307.05 $307.05 $307.05 A rate increase would require
voter approval.

LMD 8
(South Etiwanda)
$151.45 $151.45 $151.45 A rate increase would require
voter approval.

LMD 9
(Lower Etiwanda)
$644.01 $311.92 $311.92 No change recommended.

Page 245 ends

Page 3 ends

1 3
1 9
District / Name Maximum
Fiscal Year
2021/22
Fiscal Year
2022/23 Notes
LMD 10
(Rancho Etiwanda)
$1,021.79 $781.48 $804.92 3% increase to reflect an
increase in operational costs.

SLD 1
(Arterials)
$17.77 $17.77 $17.77 A rate increase would require
voter approval.

SLD 2
(Local Streets)
$39.97 $39.97 $39.97 A rate increase would require
voter approval.

SLD 3
(Victoria Planned
Community)
$47.15 $47.15 $47.15 A rate increase would require
voter approval.

SLD 4
(Terra Vista Planned
Community)
$28.96 $28.96 $28.96 A rate increase would require
voter approval.

SLD 5
(Caryn Planned
Community)
$34.60 $34.60 $34.60 A rate increase would require
voter approval.

SLD 6
(Commercial
Industrial)
$51.40 $51.40 $51.40 A rate increase would require
voter approval.

SLD 7
(North Etiwanda)
$33.32 $33.32 $33.32 A rate increase would require
voter approval.

SLD 8
(South Etiwanda)
$193.75 $30.60 $30.60 No change recommended.

PD-85
(Red Hill and
Heritage Parks)
$31.00 $31.00 $31.00 A rate increase would require
voter approval.

Detailed information for the Districts is contained in the specific preliminary Annual Engineer's Reports attached to this staff report. However, a summary of the analysis for the recommended the Fiscal Year 2022/23 rates is as follows:
Due to California law, assessment rates cannot be increased without voter approval. While voters in LMD 2, LMD 4-R, LMD 6-R, LMD 9, and LMD 10 approved annual rate escalations limited by CPI, other Districts are at the maximum allowable rate. Thus, the assessments for LMD 1, LMD 7, LMD 8, SLDs 1 through 7, and PD-85 cannot be increased. In those cases, services are reduced to lower operating costs to be in line with the assessment revenues.
There are no recommended changes to the assessment rates for LMD 3B, LMD 4-R, LMD 5, LMD 9, and SLD 8. For those Districts, City staff has determined that the current assessment rate is sufficient to meet the operational needs of the District for this year. An increase from $503.80 to $518.88, or 3.0%, but below the maximum allowable rate of $562.85, is recommended for LMD 2. The increase is primarily the result of planned capital improvement projects. The capital expenditures include $1.6 million for installing drought- tolerant landscaping, which will reduce water utility expenditures, and $250,000 for replacement of deteriorating or inoperative paseo lighting. An increase from $462.07 to $475.93 per single family residence, or 3.0%, which would bring this district to the maximum allowable rate, is recommended for LMD 6-R. During the budget analysis, the budgeted operating and capital expenditures exceeded budgeted revenues, including the General Benefit Equivalent Contribution from the General Fund,

Page 246 ends

Page 4 ends

1 3
1 9
by $73,110, indicating the need for a rate adjustment. Capital expenditures include $50,000 for installing drought-tolerant landscaping, which will decrease water utilities expenditures, which is one of the more significant single expenditures for LMD 6-R.

Reducing operating expenditures will help alleviate the use of reserves in future fiscal years.
An increase from $781.48 to $804.92 per single family residence, or 3%, but below the maximum allowable rate of $1,021.79, is recommended for LMD 10. A series of incremental increases were planned for LMD 10 to reduce the use of reserves based on budgeted expenditures and revenues. For the Fiscal Year 2022/23, the budgeted expenditures exceed budgeted revenues by $120,010.

Lastly, when the Districts were established, they were created in conjunction with new development coming into the City and were intended to bear the costs of the improvements that provide a special benefit to the property owners. However, some Districts have long-term fiscal sustainability issues due to expenditures continuing to increase above the total revenues the Districts can generate over time. Generally, this is caused by either the state law restrictions capping the maximum allowable assessment rate without voter approval or insufficient rate increases. Those Districts might receive "General Benefit Equivalent" contributions from the City's General Fund, which the City Council authorizes to support a District that is operating at a deficit, lacks the resources for necessary maintenance or has insufficient operating reserves. Per City policy, the amount of the General Benefit Equivalent will not exceed 11% of the adjusted total budget for that district.

In Fiscal Year 2022/23, the following Districts are budgeted to receive General Benefit Equivalent contributions:
$64,290 for LMD 1
$40,120 for LMD 6-R
$85,110 for SLD 2
$25,160 for SLD 5
$39,240 for SLD 7
$177,330 for PD-85 ($26,980 for operations of Red Hill and Heritage Parks and $150,350 for the Red Hill Water Feature)
Another type of contribution from the General Fund is a "General Benefit Contribution," which is required by law and quantifies the dollar value of a general benefit provided to the community at large by the District. For Fiscal Year 2022/23, LMD 2 is budgeted to receive $318,570 in General Benefit Contribution in accordance with the voter-approved measure.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Assessment revenues collected for each District are used for the maintenance and operations for only that District. The estimated costs of administration, maintenance and operations, and capital improvements in the Districts are described in the Annual Engineer's Report prepared for each District. As noted previously, certain Districts receive some support from the City General Fund due to either legal requirements (General Benefit Contribution) or due to City policy (General Benefit Equivalent). These amounts are budgeted and approved by the City Council through the budget approval process..

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council's core value of intentionally embracing and anticipating the

Page 247 ends

Page 5 ends

1 3
1 9
future by complying with reporting requirements for assessment revenues to provide public services and facilities to the Districts. Additionally, by adopting the resolutions setting a public hearing for July 20, 2022, the City Council is actively seeking and respectfully considering all public input by allowing the public an opportunity to participate in the decision-making process for the financial sustainability of the Districts.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 1
Attachment 2 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 2
Attachment 3 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 3B
Attachment 4 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 4-R
Attachment 5 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 5
Attachment 6 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 6-R
Attachment 7 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 7
Attachment 8 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 8
Attachment 9 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 9
Attachment 10 - Preliminary Engineer's Report LMD 10
Attachment 11 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 1
Attachment 12 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 2
Attachment 13 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 3
Attachment 14 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 4
Attachment 15 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 5
Attachment 16 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 6
Attachment 17 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 7
Attachment 18 - Preliminary Engineer's Report SLD 8
Attachment 19 - Preliminary Engineer's Report PD-85
Attachment 20 - Resolution LMD Preparation of Engineer's Report Attachment 21 - Resolution LMD Approving Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Attachment 22 - Resolution LMD Declare Intention to Levy Assessment & Set Pub Hearing Attachment 23 - Resolution SLD Preparation of Engineer's Report Attachment 24 - Resolution SLD Approving Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Attachment 25 - Resolution SLD Declare Intention to Levy Assessment & Set Pub Hearing Attachment 26 - Resolution PD-85 Preparation of Engineer's Report Attachment 27 - Resolution PD-85 Approving Preliminary Annual Engineer's Report Attachment 28 - Resolution PD-85 Declare Intention to Levy Assessment & Set Pub Hearing

Page 248 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
Preliminary Annual Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2022/23
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 1
(General City)

Page 249 ends

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1
(GENERAL CITY)
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Phone: 909.477.2700
Fax: 909.477.2845

CITY COUNCIL
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem
Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member
Kristine D. Scott, Council Member

CITY STAFF
John R. Gillison, City Manager
Lori E. Sassoon, Deputy City Manager/Administrative Services Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer William Wittkopf, Public Works Director
Noah Daniels, Finance Director

Page 250 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ENGINEER’S LETTER 1
INTRODUCTION 3
Reason for Assessment 3
Process for Annual Assessment 3
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4
Description of the Boundaries of the District 4
Description of Improvements and Services 4
Map of Improvements 20
ESTIMATE OF COSTS 21
District Budget 22
Definitions of Budget Items 24
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 25
Overview 25
General Benefit 26
Special Benefit 26
Method of Assessment Spread 27
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 28
ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 30
Assessment Roll 30
Annexations 30

Page 251 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2022, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the “City”), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “1972 Act”) adopted its Resolution No. 2022-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 (General City) (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act.

The Annual Engineer’s Report presents the plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements for the District for the referenced fiscal year, a diagram for the District showing the area and properties proposed to be assessed, and an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations and servicing of the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within the District in proportion to the special benefit received; and NOW THEREFORE, the following assessment is proposed to be authorized in order to pay the estimated costs of maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements to be paid by the assessable real property within the boundaries of the District in proportion to the special benefit received. The following table summarizes the proposed assessment.

Fiscal Year
2022/23 Budget
Expenditures
Personnel Services 43,550$
Operations and Maintenance 1,399,700
Capital Expenditures 398,130
Transfer Out 90,000
Total Expenditures Budget 1,931,380
Revenues
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 1,256,110 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 12,220
Subtotal - Taxes 1,268,330
Other Revenues 57,880
Transfer In 203,330
Total Revenues Budget 1,529,540
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (401,840)$
Total District EBU Count 13,621.67
Actual Assessment per EBU 92.21$
Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU 92.21$

Page 252 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act:

1. I have identified all parcels which will have a special benefit conferred upon them from the improvement described in the Special Benefit Section of this Annual Engineer’s Report (the “Specially Benefited Parcels”). For particulars as to the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the Assessment Diagram, a copy of which is included in this Annual Engineer’s Report.

2. I have evaluated the costs and expenses of the improvements upon the Specially Benefited Parcels. In making such evaluation:
a. The proportionate special benefit derived by each Specially Benefited Parcel from the improvements was determined in relationship to the entirety of the maintenance costs of the improvements;
b. No assessment has been imposed on any Specially Benefited Parcel which exceeds the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on such parcel from the improvements; and
c. Any general benefits from the improvements have been separated from the special benefits and only special benefits have been assessed.

I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer’s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer’s Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. _________________________________________________________ Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer

Page 253 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1

INTRODUCTION
Reason for Assessment
Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer’s Report will generate the revenue necessary to:

Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer’s Report. Maintenance may include, but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District.

Process for Annual Assessment
The City cannot levy and collect annual assessments within the District without complying with the procedures specified in the 1972 Act. On an annual basis, an Engineer’s Report must be prepared which contains a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District.

The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which:
Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein.
Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements.
Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District.
Refers to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District. Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment.
States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year.

If the assessments are to be levied in the same or lesser amounts than the maximum assessment amount approved, the City Clerk shall give notice by causing the resolution of intention to be published. Any interested person may, prior to the conclusion of the public hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest. During the course or upon

Page 254 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment.

The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing, must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment.

If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to, the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment.

PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
The District provides for the administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing of various improvements located within the public right-of-way and dedicated easements within the boundaries of the District.

Description of the Boundaries of the District
The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area of the City which is not located within the City's planned development communities. The District is made up of various landscaped sites throughout the City. As such, the parcels within the District do not represent a distinct district area as do the other landscape maintenance districts within the City. Typically parcels have been annexed to the District as they have developed.

Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report.

Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements maintained by the District include the paseos, community trails, trees, landscaped sites and appurtenant facilities that are throughout the District. These improvements are located within the street right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, the pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements and facilities, such as community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, grading and replacement of trail surfacing, trail fence repair and replacement, steel fence painting, repair and replacement, and irrigation systems control, adjustment, trouble-shooting, repair and

Page 255 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
replacement. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, capital projects and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City's intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:

Parks: Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park.

Site # Descriptive Location
A-1 The north and south side of Wilson Ave from Hellman Ave to Amethyst Ave.

Ground Cover area: 22,982 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,694 square feet
A-2 The east side of Hellman Ave from 326 feet south of Pepperidge Ln to 73 feet north of Pepperidge Ln.

Ground Cover area: 5,810 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,600 square feet
A-3 The south side of 19th St from 62 feet east of Mayberry Ave to 173 feet east of Mayberry Ave.

Ground Cover area: 1,680 square feet
Hardscape area: 440 square feet
A-4 The south side of Wilson Ave from Amethyst Ave to Archibald Ave; the planters and cutouts on the west side of Archibald Ave from Wilson Ave to 105 feet south of Cottonwood Way.

Ground Cover area: 5,625 square feet
A-5 The north and south side of Diamond Ave from Klusman Ave to Diamond Ave.

Ground Cover area: 3,143 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,864 square feet
A-6 The parkway on the north side of Wilson Ave from 348 feet east of Morning Canyon Way to Alder Ridge Pl.

Ground Cover area: 5,700 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,760 square feet

Page 256 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
A-7 The cutouts and vines on the south side of Wilson Ave from the Alta Loma Channel to 240 feet east of Zapata Pl.

Ground Cover area: 911 square feet
A-8 The east side of Broken Star Ct from 80 feet south of Highland Ave to Highland Ave; the north side of Highland Ave from Amethyst Ave to Broken Star Ct including wood chip area north of sidewalk, the south side of Highland Ave from Broken Star Ct to Amethyst Ave; the west side of Amethyst Ave from 140 feet south of Highland Ave to 265 feet south of Highland Ave.

Ground Cover area: 6,545 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,554 square feet
Mulchscape area: 14,005 square feet
A-9 The south side of Highland Ave from Hellman Ave to Broken Star Ct.

Ground Cover area: 7,865 square feet
A-10 The south side of 19th St from 170 feet west of Pilgrim Ct to 167 feet east of Pilgrim Ct.

Ground Cover area: 1,808 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,084 square feet
A-11 The east side of Amethyst Ave from Lemon Ave to 230 feet north of Apricot Ave.

Ground Cover area: 2,115 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,438 square feet
A-12 The west side of Sapphire St from 710 feet north of Hillside Rd to Hillside Rd.

Ground Cover area: 4,500 square feet
A-13 The south side of Victoria St from 110 feet west of London Ave to Ramona Ave.

Ground Cover area: 2,705 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,480 square feet
A-14 The west side of Archibald Ave from 273 feet north of La Gloria Dr to Lemon Ave; the La Gloria Dr median from Archibald Ave to Jadeite Ave; the north and south side of La Gloria Dr from Archibald Ave to 53 feet east of Jadeite Ave; the north side of Lemon Ave from Archibald Ave to 55 feet east of Klusman Ave.

Ground Cover area: 12,880 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,030 square feet

Page 257 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
A-15 The planters and cutouts on the east side of Archibald Ave from 610 feet south of Cottonwood Way to Wilson Ave; the south side of Wilson Ave from Archibald Ave to Alta Loma Channel.

Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet
A-16 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Archibald Ave from Banyan St to 190 feet north of Sunflower St.

Ground Cover area: 1,580 square feet
A-17 The cutouts and planters on the west side of Archibald Ave from 225 feet south of Wilson Ave to Banyan St.

Ground Cover area: 2,362 square feet
A-18 The cutouts and planters on the north side of Banyan St from Jadeite Ave to 410 feet west of Jadeite Ave.

Ground Cover area: 216 square feet
A-19 The cutouts and planters on the east side of Amethyst Ave from 192 feet south of Sunflower St to Manzanita Dr.

Ground Cover area: 4,325 square feet
A-20 The west side of Archibald Ave from 210 feet north of La Colina Dr to 230 feet south of Almond St; the south side of La Colina Dr from Archibald Ave to Jadeite Ave.

Ground Cover area: 17,120 square feet
A-21 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail from Riverwood Pl to Raspberry Pl north of the County flood retention basin that is west of Chaffey College.

Ground Cover area: 22,832 square feet
A-22 The west side of Haven Ave from Carrari St to Vista Grove St.

Ground Cover area: 4,572 square feet
A-23 The west side of Haven Ave from 434 feet north of Manzanita Dr to 258 feet south of Manzanita Dr.

Ground Cover area: 54,258 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,581 square feet
A-24 The south side of 19th St from 286 feet east of Amethyst Ave to 166 feet west of Klusman Ave.

Ground Cover area: 5,904 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,938 square feet

Page 258 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
A-25 The equestrian trail and planters on the east side of Hermosa Ave from 421 feet south of Whispering Forest Dr to Sun Valley Dr.

Ground Cover area: 17,529 square feet
A-26 The west side of Haven Ave from 630 feet north of Wilson Ave to Wilson Ave; the parkway on the north side of Wilson Ave from Haven Ave to Mayberry Ave; the parkway on the east side of Mayberry Ave from Wilson Ave to 382 feet north of Poplar St, and the east and west side of Cartilla Ave from Wilson Ave to Poplar St.

Ground Cover area: 10,243 square feet
Mulchscape area: 25,297 square feet
A-27 The north side of 19th St from Mayberry Ave to 93 feet east of Castle Gate Pl.

Ground Cover area: 5,145 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,870 square feet
A-28 The east side of Hermosa Ave from 360 feet south of Manzanita Dr to Manzanita Dr, and the south side of Manzanita Dr from Hermosa Ave to Raspberry Pl.

Ground Cover area: 7,421 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,712 square feet
A-29 The south side of Wilson Ave from 240 feet west of Timbermist Pl to Hermosa Ave; the west side of Hermosa Ave from Wilson Ave to 213 feet south of Oakgrove Dr.

Ground Cover area: 11,184 square feet
A-30 Site was removed from contract and water service cancelled January 1, 2017.

A-31 The south side of Lemon Ave from London Ave to Calle Hermoso.

Ground Cover area: 4,404 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,800 square feet
A-32 The north side of Lemon Ave from the Alta Loma Channel to London Ave; the east side of London Ave from Lemon Ave to Cypress Ct.

Ground Cover area: 4,463 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,375 square feet
A-33 The parkway on the east side of London Ave from 158 feet north of Banyan St to 310 feet north of Banyan St.

Ground Cover area: 1,029 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,160 square feet

Page 259 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
A-34 The south side of Alta Loma Dr from Mayberry Ave to Revere Ave.

Ground Cover area: 2,772 square feet
A-35 The west side of Hermosa Ave from Lemon Ave to 125 feet north of Highland Ave, the parkway on the south side of Lemon Ave from 621 feet west of Hermosa Ave to Hermosa Ave.

Ground Cover area: 10,494 square feet
Hardscape area: 9,207 square feet
Mulchscape area: 2,370 square feet
A-36 The south side of Lemon Ave from 385 feet west of Mayberry Ave to Cartilla Ave.

Ground Cover area: 4,850 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,915 square feet
A-37 The south side of Hillside Rd north and south of the equestrian trail from Beryl St to 203 feet east of Eastwood Ave.

Ground Cover area: 4,900 square feet
A-38 The median in the 9200 block of Monte Vista St.

Ground Cover area: 500 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,380 square feet
A-39 The south side of Almond St from Henry St to Sapphire St. The west side of Sapphire St from Almond St to 255 feet south of Bella Vista Dr.

Ground Cover area: 6,926 square feet
A-40 The parkway on the east side of Jasper St from Hunter Dr to Highland Ave. The parkway on the south side of Highland Ave from Jasper St to Carnelian St. The west side of Carnelian St from Highland Ave to 210 feet south of Highland Ave.

Ground Cover area: 14,858 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,040 square feet
A-41 The west side of Sapphire St from 236 feet north of Thoroughbred St to Banyan St.

Ground Cover area: 1,784 square feet
Hardscape area: 812 square feet
A-42 The parkway on the west side of Beryl St from 132 feet north of Sunflower St to Banyan St.

Ground Cover area: 4,735 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,772 square feet

Page 260 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
A-43 The north side of Base Line Rd from Topaz St to the Cucamonga Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 4,563 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,890 square feet
A-44 The cutouts on the west side of Sapphire St from Banyan St to Marble Ave.

Ground Cover area: 7,300 square feet
A-45 The mainline for this site was connected to A-46 on September 8, 1999.

A-46 The south side of Banyan St from Northstar Pl to Zircon Ave.

Ground Cover area: 7,448 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,890 square feet
A-47 The cutouts and vines on the north side of Banyan St from 180 feet east of Zircon Ave to 186 feet west of Vineyard Ave.

Ground Cover area: 1,300 square feet
A-48 The parkway on the west side of Beryl St from 452 feet north of Cielito St; 158 feet south of Cielito St and the easement between 9063 and 9073 Cielito St from Cielito St to 170 feet south of Cielito St.

Ground Cover area: 6,916 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,440 square feet
A-49 The east side of Carnelian St from 662 feet south of Banyan St to Banyan St; the south side of Banyan St from Carnelian St to Northstar Pl.

Ground Cover area: 5,906 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,972 square feet
A-50 The north side of Almond St from Sapphire St to Crestview Pl; the east and west side of Skyline Rd from Almond St to 595 feet north of Almond St.

Ground Cover area: 17,600 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,680 square feet
A-51 The planter adjacent to the equestrian trail; from Haven Ave to Riverwood Pl, north of County flood retention basin, west of Chaffey College. The west side of Haven Ave from 400 feet north of Amber Ln to 270 feet south of Amber Ln, and the north and south side of Amber Ln from Haven Ave to San Felipe Ct.

Ground Cover area: 37,977 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,458 square feet

Page 261 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
A-52 The east side of Riverwood Pl, from 188 feet south of Charwood Ct to 193 feet north of Charwood Ct.

Ground Cover area: 2,750 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet
A-53 The west side of Jasper St from Hunter Dr to Highland Ave. The south side of Highland from Jasper St to 308 feet west of Sard St. The east and west side of Sard St from Highland Ave to Hunter Dr.

Ground Cover area: 7,445 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,740 square feet
A-54 The west side of Beryl St from 233 feet north of Mignonette St to Mignonette St.

Ground Cover area: 2,637 square feet
Hardscape area: 932 square feet
A-55 The north side of 19th St from Cartilla Ave to Mayberry Ave. The east side of Mayberry Ave from 19th St to Heather St.

Ground Cover area: 8,410 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,060 square feet
A-56 The east side of Beryl St from 410 feet north of Wilson Ave to Wilson Ave. The north side of Wilson Ave from Beryl St to 731 feet west of Buckthorn Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave from Buckthorn Ave to Beryl St.

Ground Cover area: 19,708 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,436 square feet
A-57 The east side of Hermosa Ave from 115 feet north of Coca St to 451 feet north of Coca St. The trail north of water retention basin from Hermosa Ave to 619 feet east of Hermosa Ave.

Ground Cover area: 9,406 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,794 square feet
A-58 The west side of Haven Ave from 510 feet south of Victoria St to 1005 feet south of Victoria St.

Ground Cover area: 7,301 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,790 square feet
A-59 The east side of Archibald Ave from 820 feet south of Lemon Ave to 448 feet south of Lemon Ave and continues from 275 feet south of Lemon Ave to 185 south of Lemon Ave.

Ground Cover area: 4,777 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,041 square feet

Page 262 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
A-60 The south side of Lemon Ave from 290 feet east of Archibald Ave to London Ave. The west side of London Ave from Lemon Ave to Orange St.

Ground Cover area: 2,569 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,122 square feet
A-61 The north side of Carrari St from London Ave to Archibald Ave.

Ground Cover area: 25,152 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,698 square feet
A-62 The east side of Archibald Ave from Carrari St to 505 feet north of Meadowood Dr.

Ground Cover area: 8,626 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,824 square feet
A-63 The south side of Almond St from Carriage Rd to Almond St.

Ground Cover area: 3,342 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet
A-64 The east side of Beryl St from Cottonwood Way to Wilson Ave. The south side of Wilson Ave from Beryl St to 437 feet east of Beryl St. The north side of Wilson Ave from Cousins Pl to 474 feet east of Cousins Pl.

Ground Cover area: 11,973 square feet
Hardscape area: 9,949 square feet
A-65 The east side of Archibald Ave from La Gloria Dr to 328 feet north of La Gloria Dr.

Ground Cover area: 2,279 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,411 square feet
A-66 The east side of Hermosa Ave from Waterford Ln to 500 feet north of Waterford Ln.

Ground Cover area: 4,695 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,947 square feet
A-67 The south side of 19th St from 220 feet east of Sapphire St to Via Serena.

Ground Cover area: 3,208 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,158 square feet
A-68 The west side of Haven Ave from Hillside Rd to 783 feet south of Hillside Rd.

Ground Cover area: 3,492 square feet
A-69 The north side of Hillside Rd from 27 feet west of Mayberry Ave to 191 feet west of Mayberry Ave.

Ground Cover area: 1,002 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,605 square feet

Page 263 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
A-70 The south side of 19th St from 365 feet west of Amethyst Ave to Amethyst Ave. The west side of Amethyst Ave from 19th to Hedges Dr.

Ground Cover area: 6,435 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,015 square feet
A-71 The west side of Archibald Ave from Hillside Rd to Wilson Ave. The north side of Wilson Ave, south of the trail fence area from Archibald Ave to 467 feet west of Archibald Ave.

Ground Cover area: 9,265 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,609 square feet
A-72 The south side of Banyan St from 420 feet west of Archibald Ave to Archibald Ave. The west side of Archibald Ave from Banyan St to 389 feet south of Banyan St.

Ground Cover area: 10,270 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,673 square feet
A-73 The west side of Beryl St from 300 feet north of San Simeon Dr to 130 feet north of San Simeon Dr.

Ground Cover area: 1,200 square feet
Hardscape area: 600 square feet
A-74 The south side of Highland Ave from Beryl St to Hellman Ave.

Ground Cover area: 11,603 square feet
A-75 The south side of Highland Ave from Amethyst Ave to 612 feet east of Archibald Ave.

Ground Cover area: 106,409 square feet
Hardscape area: 60,608 square feet
A-76 The west side of Archibald Ave from 635 feet north of Hillside Rd to Hillside Rd. The north side of Hillside Rd from Archibald Ave to 770 feet west of Archibald Ave.

Ground Cover area: 8,859 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,389 square feet
A-77 The east side of Carnelian St from Brilliant Ln to Wilson Ave including the irrigation cut- outs along trail. The south side of Wilson Ave from Carnelian St to 745 feet east of Arabian Dr. The irrigation cut-outs on the north side of Wilson Ave from Carnelian St to 775 feet east of Arabian Dr.

Ground Cover area: 5,101 square feet
Hardscape area: 11,322 square feet
B-1 The median on Blue Gum Dr from Etiwanda Ave to Blue Gum Dr.

Ground Cover area: 5,100 square feet

Page 264 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
B-2 The north side of Highland Ave from the Deer Creek Channel to San Benito Ave. The north side of 19th St from San Benito Ave to Palm Dr. The west and east side of Alameda Ave from 19th St to Ring Ave. The east side of Palm Dr from 19th St to Ring Ave.

Ground Cover area: 47,397 square feet
Hardscape area: 26,285 square feet
B-3 The paseo from Sutter Ct to Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 294 square feet
Hardscape area: 400 square feet
B-4 The north side of Banyan St from Deer Creek Channel to 355 feet west of Fredericksburg Ave.

Ground Cover area: 9,200 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,834 square feet
B-5 The north side of Lemon Ave from Semillion Pl to 188 feet west of Terracina Ave.

Ground Cover area: 14,472 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,894 square feet
B-6 The north side of Lemon Ave from Barsac Pl to Semillion Pl.

Ground Cover area: 15,784 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,780 square feet
B-7 The south side of Banyan St from Cabernet Pl to 414 feet east of Cabernet Pl.

Ground Cover area: 18,814 square feet
B-8 The south side of Banyan St from Callaway Pl to Muscat Pl.

Ground Cover area: 10,505 square feet
B-9 The east side of Haven Ave from Banyan St to 240 feet north of Banyan St. The north side of Banyan St from Haven Ave to Merlot Ct.

Ground Cover area: 24,975 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,356 square feet
B-10 The east side of Haven Ave from 400 feet south of Banyan St to Banyan St. The south side of Banyan St from Haven Ave to Callaway Pl.

Ground Cover area: 14,548 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,348 square feet
B-11 The south side of Banyan St from Muscat Pl to Cabernet Pl.

Ground Cover area: 33,282 square feet

Page 265 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
B-12 The north side of Lemon Ave from Barsac Pl to 135 feet east of Valinda Ave.

Ground Cover area: 13,464 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,098 square feet
B-13 The south side of 19th St from Inyo Pl to 585 feet east of San Benito Ave. The parkways on the east and west side of San Benito Ave from 19th St to San Mateo Pl. The east side of Inyo Pl from 19th St to paseo south of 19th St and the paseo running east from Inyo Pl to Sonora Ave.

Ground Cover area: 20,950 square feet
Hardscape area: 14,192 square feet
B-14 The paseo from San Benito Ave and Sonora Ave to the Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 2,000 square feet
Hardscape area: 540 square feet
B-15 The paseo from Stanislaus Pl and La Vine St to the Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 1,040 square feet
Hardscape area: 428 square feet
B-16 The paseo from Inyo Pl to Mendocino Pl.

Ground Cover area: 225 square feet
Hardscape area: 184 square feet
B-17 The paseo from Yuba Ct to Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 918 square feet
Hardscape area: 420 square feet
B-18 The south side of Wilson Ave from 377 feet west of Canistel Ave to 1032 feet east of Canistel Ave.

Ground Cover area: 6,762 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,454 square feet
B-19 The east side of Haven Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 341 feet south of Victoria St.

Ground Cover area: 6,415 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,865 square feet
B-20 The east side of Haven Ave from 341 feet south of Victoria St to Victoria St; the south side of Victoria St from Haven Ave to 237 feet east of Mango St.

Ground Cover area: 16,900 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,767 square feet

Page 266 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
B-21 The south side of 19th St from Valinda Ave to Inyo Pl.

Ground Cover area: 3,900 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,700 square feet
B-22 The south side of Lemon Ave south of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 284 feet north of Marbella Dr. The parkway on the south side of Lemon Ave from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 517 feet north of Marbella Dr. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac on Sonterra Ct. The parkway on the north side of Lemon Ave from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 526 feet south of Terracina Ave. The north side of Lemon Ave north of the sidewalk from 188 feet west of Terracina Ave to 562 feet south of Terracina Ave. The turf in the parkway at the end of the cul-de-sac at Serena Pl.

Ground Cover area: 17,688 square feet
Turf area: 6,390 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,928 square feet
B-23 The parkway on the east side of Lemon Ave from 129 feet south of Marbella Dr to 526 feet south of Terracina Ave. The slope on the east side of Lemon Ave east of the sidewalk from 129 feet south of Marbella Dr to 562 feet south of Terracina Ave. The west side of Lemon Ave west of the sidewalk from 284 feet north of Marbella Dr to 129 feet south of Marbella Dr. The parkway on the west side of Lemon Ave from 517 feet north of Marbella Dr to 129 feet south of Marbella Dr.

Ground Cover area: 22,531 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,468 square feet
B-24 The south side of Highland Ave from 327 feet west of Deer Creek Channel to Deer Creek Channel. The paseo from Los Osos Way to Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 4,946 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,099 square feet
B-25 The south side of Banyan St from 152 feet west of Cantabria Ave to 930 feet east of Cantabria Ave.

Ground Cover area: 16,693 square feet
B-26 The north side of Wilson Ave from 590 feet west of High Meadow Pl to 187 feet east of High Meadow Pl.

Ground Cover area: 4,628 square feet
Hardscape area: 390 square feet
B-27 The east side of Haven Ave from 467 feet north of 19th St to 650 feet north of 19th St.

Ground Cover area: 3,483 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,235 square feet

Page 267 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
C-1 The north side of 26th St from Andover Pl to Hermosa Ave. The east side of Hermosa Ave from 26th St to 331 feet north of Concord Dr.

Ground Cover area: 22,227 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,532 square feet
C-2 The entry monument on the northeast and northwest corners of 4th St and Archibald Ave.

Ground Cover area: 6,337 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,998 square feet
C-3 The south side of Base Line Rd from Ramona Ave to 128 feet east of Cambridge Ave.

Ground Cover area: 17,262 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,865 square feet
C-4 The south side of Base Line Rd from 440 feet west of Ramona Ave to Ramona Ave.

Ground Cover area: 6,198 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,200 square feet
C-5 The south side of Base Line Rd from 340 feet west of Center Ave to 103 feet east of Center Ave.

Ground Cover area: 8,850 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,215 square feet
C-6 The south side of Base Line Rd from Ivy Ln to 105 feet west of Marine Ave.

Ground Cover area: 8,080 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,475 square feet
C-7 The parkway on the north side of Church St from 142 feet east of Teak Way to 230 feet west of Teak Way.

Ground Cover area: 1,813 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,650 square feet
C-8 The west side of Hermosa Ave from 524 feet north of Palo Alto St to 142 feet south of Palo Alto St.

Ground Cover area: 2,650 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,996 square feet
C-9 The parkway on the west side of Hermosa Ave from 163 feet north of Ironwood St to 145 feet south of Ironwood St.

Ground Cover area: 1,500 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,848 square feet

Page 268 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
C-10 The entry monument parkway on the south side of Base Line Rd from the western city limit to Alta Cuesta Dr.

Ground Cover area: 9,756 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,380 square feet
C-11 The parkway on the east side of Beryl St from Alder St to 135 feet north of Culpepper St.

Ground Cover area: 3,400 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,600 square feet
C-12 The parkway on the east side of Hellman Ave from Tryon St to 665 feet north of Tryon St.

Ground Cover area: 8,280 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet
C-13 The parkway on the west side of Hellman Ave from 500 feet north of Church St to Church St.

Ground Cover area: 2,416 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,000 square feet
C-14 The east side of Archibald Ave from 196 feet north of Palo Alto St to 530 feet north of Palo Alto St.

Ground Cover area: 4,262 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,374 square feet
C-15 The north side of San Bernardino Rd from Summerlin Pl to 225 feet west of Summerlin Pl.

Ground Cover area: 1,660 square feet
Hardscape area: 710 square feet
C-16 The south side of Base Line Rd from 286 feet west of Hermosa Ave to Hermosa Ave.

The raised planter on the southwest corner of Base Line Rd and Hermosa Ave.

Ground Cover area: 4,190 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,320 square feet
C-17 The east side of Hellman Ave from 775 feet south of 6th St to 6th St. The south side of 6th St from Hellman Ave to Golden Oak Rd. The west side of Golden Oak Rd from 6th St to Foxbrook Dr.

Ground Cover area: 9,058 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,387 square feet

Page 269 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
D-1 The east side of Rochester Ave from Church St to Base Line Rd.

Ground Cover area: 27,920 square feet
Hardscape area: 17,301 square feet
D-2 The east side of Rochester Ave from 146 feet south of Chervil St to Church St.

Ground Cover area: 21,858 square feet
Hardscape area: 13,263 square feet
D-3 The south side of Base Line Rd from Rochester Ave to 600 feet east of Rochester Ave.

Ground Cover area: 2,180 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,121 square feet
D-4 The north and south sides of Church St from Rochester Ave to 150 feet east of Hyssop Dr.

Ground Cover area: 6,340 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,887 square feet
D-5 The landscape along the Edison corridor from Arrow Rt. To Foothill Blvd.

Ground Cover area: 23,392 square feet
H-9 The Haven Ave median from the 210 freeway to Alta Loma Dr.

Ground Cover area: 2,207 square feet
H-10 The Haven Ave median from entrance of Haven Village to Amber Ln.

Ground Cover area: 6,968 square feet
Converted 5,131 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013
H-11 The Haven Ave median from Amber Ln to Olive Way.

Ground Cover area: 5,026 square feet
Converted 3,475 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013
H-12 The Haven Ave median from Olive Way to 712 feet north of Wilson Ave.

Ground Cover area: 6,734 square feet
Converted 3,933 square feet of turf to ground cover effective April 1, 2013. Area listed is the 50% maintained by LMD 1. An equal amount is maintained by General Fund as of March 25, 2013
H-13 The Haven Ave median from 19th St to the 210 freeway.

Ground Cover area: 12,514 square feet

Page 270 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
FH-18 The Foothill Blvd median from East Ave to 453 feet east of Cornwall Ct.

Ground Cover area: 5,450 square feet
Parks, ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company.

Map of Improvements
The following page shows the map of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites and community trails, to be maintained using District funds.

Page 271 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1

Page 272 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1

ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated costs of administration, maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year.

District Budget
Fiscal Year 2022/23 BudgetExpendituresPersonnel Services: Regular Salaries 18,720$ Part-time Salaries 11,940 Fringe Benefits 12,890 Subtotal - Personnel 43,550 Operations and Maintenance: Operations and Maintenance: O & M/General 83,750 O & M/Facilities 2,300 Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 5,800 Equipment Operations and Maintenance 3,000 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 94,850 Contract Services: Contract Services/General 608,810 Contract Services/Facilities 7,410 Contract Vehicle Maintenance/Repair 2,000 Tree Maintenance 145,780 Subtotal - Contract Services 764,000 Utilities: Telephone Utilities 1,890 Water Utilities 380,530 Electric Utilities 42,100 Subtotal - Utilities 424,520 Assessment Administration 43,290 Admin./General Overhead 72,380 Other Expenses 660 Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 1,399,700 Capital Expenditures: Captial Outlay - Equipment 7,130 Captial Outlay - Improvements Other Than Building 69,000 Captial Project 322,000 Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 398,130 Transfer Out: Transfer Out - LMD #1 Capital Reserve Fund 90,000 Total Expenditures Budget 1,931,380$

Page 273 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
Fiscal Year2022/23 BudgetRevenuesTaxes: Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 1,256,110$ Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 12,220 Subtotal - Taxes 1,268,330 Other Revenues: Interest Earnings 16,620 Other Rental/Lease Income 28,270 Park Maintenance Fees 3,050 Sports Field User Group Rentals 110 Sports Lighting Fees 9,730 Other Revenue 100 Subtotal - Other Revenues: 57,880 Transfer In: Transfer In - General Fund 64,290 Transfer In - LMD #1 Operating Fund 90,000 Transfer In - CFD Empire Lakes 49,040 Subtotal - Transfer In: 203,330 Total Revenues Budget 1,529,540
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (401,840)$
Total Gross Estimated Assessments 1,256,106.10$ Total District EBU Count 13,621.67Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2022/23 92.21$ Maximum Allowable Assement per EBU - Fiscal Year 2022/23 92.21$ The maximum allowable assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) listed in the District budget above, is the amount which was approved in 1996/97 and subsequent District annexations. Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year. The actual assessment per EBU will be based on the estimated costs of maintenance, available fund balance and maximum allowable assessment with the goal of maintaining the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum unless the increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218.

It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. Beginning with Fiscal Year 2016/17 the City will maintain a Capital Reserve Fund to be used for deferred maintenance and pending capital projects. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows:

Page 274 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
Operating Capital TotalReserve Reserve ReserveEstimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 $1,306,447 $415,783 1,722,230$Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2022/23 (340,730) (61,110) (401,840)Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2023 $965,717 $354,673 1,320,390$ Definitions of Budget Items
The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget:

Personnel Services: This item includes the costs attributed to the salaries of all full-time and part-time employees dedicated to maintenance of the District improvements. Additionally, this includes benefits available to City employees.

Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District.

Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements.

Utilities: This item includes the costs to furnish electricity, water, and telephone services, as required, for the operation and maintenance of the sprinklers and irrigation controllers in the District.

Assessment Administration: This item includes the cost of all particular departments and staff of the City, as well as consultants, for providing the administration, coordination and management of District services, operations, and incidental expenses related to the District. This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings.

General Overhead: This item includes the costs of all central services departments of the City for providing the coordination of District services, inspections, annual bid management, responding to public concerns, public education, accounting, auditing and procedural matters associated with the District. This item also includes an allocation for general City staff time for administrative functions and systems that provide for a functional and operational District within the City's administrative structure.

Capital Outlay: This item includes new improvements to further enhance the level and quality of service provided within the boundaries of the District. This may include new monuments, irrigation systems, and other large improvements.

Page 275 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking).

METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
Overview
Pursuant to the 1972 Act and Article XIII D, all parcels that have a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements.

The 1972 Act, permits the establishment of assessment districts for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements.

Section 22573 of the 1972 Act requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:

The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.

The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California].

Section 22547 of the 1972 Act also permits the designation of zones of benefit within any individual assessment district if "by reasons or variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improvements, the various areas will receive different degrees of benefit from the improvement." Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and rights-of-ways, public greenbelts and public parkways.

The net amount to be assessed may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels. Proposition 218, approved by

Page 276 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
the voters in November 1996, requires the City to separate general benefit from special benefit, where only special benefit is assessed.

General Benefit
Section 4 of Article XIII D of the California Constitution provides that once a local agency which proposes to impose assessments on property has identified those parcels that will have special benefits conferred upon them and upon which an assessment will be imposed, the local agency must next "separate the general benefits from the special benefits conferred," and only the special benefits can be included in the amount of the assessments imposed.

In this District, the improvements being financed consists of the maintenance of local improvements located within the boundaries of the District and include paseos, street trees, landscaped areas, Parks - Bear Gulch Park, East and West Beryl Park, Old Town Park, Church Street Park, Golden Oaks Park, Hermosa Park, and the undeveloped Don Tiburcio Tapia Park and appurtenant facilities that are located throughout the General City and were installed to create a common landscape theme and neighborhood identity for parcels within the District. The improvements are situated within the public rights-of-way of the internal local street network within the General City which provides ingress and egress for parcels within the District to access the City’s system of arterial streets. City residents and traffic from parcels not within the District do not use the internal local street network or paseos except for the express purpose of accessing properties located within the District, and therefore do not benefit from the improvements. Only parcels which are within the District and proximate to the improvements and within the District are being assessed. Accordingly, there is a direct physical and visual nexus between each parcel being assessed and the improvements to be funded by the assessment that does not exist for parcels outside of the District boundary and that is particular and distinct from that shared by the public at large. Under these circumstances, all of the benefits conferred are direct and local in nature, and provide a benefit to only those parcels located within the boundaries of the District.

Based upon this, it has been determined that there is no quantifiable general benefit to the surrounding community and the public in general from the maintenance of the improvements within the boundaries of the District, and therefore no portion of the project costs should be attributed to general benefit.

Special Benefit
The maintenance and servicing of the improvements within the District (which are described in the Description of Improvements and Services Section of this report) are for the benefit of the properties within the District and, as such, confer a special and direct benefit to parcels within the District by:
improving the livability, appearance, and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District, and

Page 277 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
ensuring that improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties within the District, and providing beautification, shade and overall enhancement to properties within the District.

The above mentioned items affect the assessed property in a way that is particular and distinct from their effect on other parcels and that real property in general and the public at large do not share. They contribute to a specific enhancement of the properties within the District. Since these improvements, including the community trails, were installed and are maintained specifically for the properties within the District, only properties within the District receive a special benefit and are assessed for said maintenance.

Method of Assessment Spread
Each of the parcels within the District is deemed to receive special benefit from the improvements.

Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements is identified and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements.

When the District was formed, Article XIII D and Proposition 218 had not yet been passed. Upon the passage of Article XIII D and the subsequent passage of the Proposition Omnibus Implementation Act, new rules were put into place. Due to the changes in legal requirements, as property annexed to the District after the passage of the Assessment Law, the description of the method of assessment became more refined; however, the assessment per parcel has remained the same since Fiscal Year 1996/97. Further, no parcel included in the District formation or annexations prior to when the language was refined are now being levied differently than they were at the time the District was formed or the parcels were annexed.

To assess special benefit appropriately, it is necessary to relate the different type of parcel improvements to each other. The EBU method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment.

A single-family home equals one EBU. Every other land-use is converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates to the property's specific development status, type of development (land-use), and size of the property, as compared to a single-family home. The following table provides the weighting factors applied to various land-use types, as assigned by County use code, to determine each parcel's EBU assignment.

Page 278 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1
Land-Use Equivalent Dwelling Units
Property Type (County Use Code) EBU Value Multiplier
Single Family Residential 1.00 Parcel
Multi-Family Residential 0.50 Unit
Non-Residential 2.00 Acre
The use of the latest County Assessor's Secured Roll shall be the basis for the Property Type determination and units/acreage assignments, unless better data is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the current fiscal year, the Property Type and EBU assignment shall be based on the correct parcel number and/or new parcel number(s) County use code and subsequent property information. If a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the EBU assignment and assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels will be recalculated rather than spread the proportionate share of the original assessment.

The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2022/23 maximum allowable assessment rates for the District:

Maximum Allowable Assessment Rate per EBU
Actual Assessment Rate per EBU Total Units/Acres Total EBUs Single Family Residential $92.21 $92.21 8,413.00 8,413.00 Multi-Family Residential 92.21 92.21 10,382.00 5,191.00 Non-Residential 92.21 92.21 8.83 17.67
The total amount of maintenance and incidental costs for maintaining the landscaping and community trail improvements is assessed to the individual parcels of real property within the District in proportion to the special benefit received by such parcels of real property. The proposed individual assessments are shown on the assessment roll in this report.

ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
An Assessment Diagram for the District is shown on the following page. The lines and dimensions of each lot or parcel within the District are those lines and dimensions shown on the maps of the San Bernardino County Assessor Office, at the time this report was prepared, and are incorporated by reference herein and made part of this Engineer's Report.

Page 279 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 29 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1

Page 280 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 30 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 1

ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS
Assessment Roll
The assessment roll is a listing of the assessment for Fiscal Year 2022/23 apportioned to each lot or parcel, as shown on the last equalized roll of the Assessor of the County of San Bernardino.

The following table summarizes the Fiscal Year 2022/23 actual assessments for the District:

Property Type (County Use Code)
Actual
Assessment
Rate Per EBU
Total Units/
Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment
Single-family Residential $92.21 8,413.00 8,413.00 $775,762.73 Multi-family Residential 92.21 10,382.00 5,191.00 478,714.02 Non-residential 92.21 8.83 17.67 1,629.35
Total 18,803.83 13,621.67 $1,256,106.10
A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office.

Annexations
The following annexations are effective for Fiscal Year 2022/23:

APN Annexation Date Project Name Total Units/Acres Total EBUS Property Type 1077-881-13 02/03/21 DRC2016-00593 92.00 46.00 Multi-family Res 0201-182-33 02/03/21 PMT2020-04723 1.00 1.00 Single-family Res 0201-163-05 04/21/21 PMT2020-05213 1.00 1.00 Single-family Res 1061-351-11 04/21/21 PMT2020-03289 1.00 1.00 Single-family Res 1074-451-12 04/21/21 PMT2020-04586 1.00 1.00 Single-family Res 1062-131-28 08/04/21 PMT2021-00438 1.00 1.00 Single-family Res 0209-101-08 11/03/21 PMT2021-01562 1.00 1.00 Single-family Res 0208-091-44 11/03/21 SUBTPM20101 3.00 3.00 Single-family Res

Page 281 ends

ATTACHMENT 2
Preliminary Annual Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2022/23
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
(Victoria Neighborhood Parks)

Page 282 ends

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
Landscape Maintenance District No. 2
(Victoria Neighborhood Parks)
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Phone: 909.477.2700
Fax: 909.477.2845

CITY COUNCIL
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem
Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member
Kristine D. Scott, Council Member

Page 283 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ENGINEER’S LETTER 1
INTRODUCTION 3
Reason for Assessment 3
Process for Annual Assessment 3
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4
Description of the Boundaries of the District 4
Description of Improvements and Services 4
Map of Improvements 22
ESTIMATE OF COSTS 24
District Budget 24
Definitions of Budget Items 26
BENEFITS FROM IMPROVEMENTS AND QUANTIFICATION 27
Benefits from Improvements 27
Quantification of Benefit 29
Sidewalks and Community Trails 30
Street Landscaping 32
Neighborhood Parks 37
Collective General Benefit 39
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 39
Overview 39
Apportioning of Special Benefit 40
Rate per Benefit Unit 47
Method of Assessment Spread 47
Applying the Method of Assessment Spread 47

Page 284 ends

Proposed Maximum Assessment Rates 50
Cost of Living Inflator 50
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 51
ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 53
Assessment Roll 53
Annexations 53

Page 285 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2022, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the “City”), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “1972 Act”) adopted its Resolution No. 2022-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 (Victoria Neighborhood Parks) (hereafter, referred to as the “District”); and
WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act.

Fiscal Year
2022/23 Budget
Expenditures
Personnel Services 987,310$
Operations and Maintenance 3,202,990
Capital Expenditures 2,140,240
Total Expenditures Budget 6,330,540
Revenues
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 3,846,420 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 27,410
Subtotal - Taxes 3,873,830
Other Revenues 30,760
Transfer In 318,570
Total Revenues Budget 4,223,160
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (2,107,380)$
Total District EBU Count 81,554.33
Actual Assessment per EBU 47.18$
Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU 51.18$

Page 286 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act:

I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer’s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer’s Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. __________________________________________________________ Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer

Page 287 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 3 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2

INTRODUCTION
Reason for Assessment
Approval of the assessment covered by this Engineer’s Report will generate the revenue necessary to:

Provide for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements described in this Engineer’s Report. Maintenance may include but is not limited to, all of the following: the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of any improvement or facility such as paseos, community trails, fencing and irrigation systems, and providing for the growth, vigor and care of the trees and landscape plant materials. Servicing means the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscape or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include material, vehicle, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District.

The City Council must also adopt a resolution of intention which:
Declares the intention of the City Council to levy and collect assessments within the District for the fiscal year stated therein.
Generally describes the existing and proposed improvements and any substantial changes proposed to be made in existing improvements.
Refers to the District by its distinctive designation and indicate the general location of the District.
Refers to the Engineer’s Report, on file with the City Clerk, for a full and detailed description of the improvements, the boundaries of the District and any zones therein, and the proposed assessments upon assessable lots and parcels of land within the District.
Gives notice of the time and place for public hearing by the City Council on the levy of the proposed assessment.
States whether the assessment is proposed to increase from the previous year.

Page 288 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 4 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
hearing, file a written protest which shall state all grounds of objection. The protest shall contain a description sufficient to identify the property owned by the property owner filing the protest.

During the course or upon conclusion of the hearing, the City Council may order changes in any of the matters provided in the report, including the improvements, to the zones within the District, and the proposed diagram or the proposed assessment.

The City Council, upon conclusion of the public hearing must then adopt a resolution confirming the diagram and assessment, either as originally proposed or as changed by it. The adoption of the resolution shall constitute the levy of an assessment for the fiscal year referred to in the assessment.

If the assessment to be levied exceeds the maximum assessment amount previously approved, the City must comply with the procedures specified in Article XIII D and Proposition 218. The voters in the State of California in November 1996 added Article XIII D to the California Constitution imposing, among other requirements, the necessity for the City to conduct an assessment ballot procedure to enable the owners of each property on which assessments are proposed to be enacted or increased, the opportunity to express their support for, or opposition to the proposed assessment or increase in such assessment.

Description of the Boundaries of the District
The District is located in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, State of California. The boundaries of the District are generally described as that area located south of the 210 Freeway, west of Etiwanda Ave, southwest of the I-15 Freeway, and east of Haven Ave, also known as the Victoria Neighborhood Parks and Landscape Maintenance District, and are more particularly in the diagram of the District included herein.

Reference is also made to the Assessment Diagram included in this Report.

Description of Improvements and Services
The improvements located in and serviced and maintained by the District generally include: the landscaping and associated landscape lighting and irrigation systems installed along the roadways, medians, and community trails; sidewalks; and six neighborhood parks that are of direct and special benefit to the parcels within the District. These improvements are located within the public right-of-ways and dedicated public easements which are within the boundaries of the District. The landscaping maintenance includes, but is not limited to, pruning, fertilizing, mowing, weeding, pest control, removal of trash/debris/graffiti, and irrigation of the trees, shrubs, vines, ground cover, and turf. Maintenance of associated improvements, including the

Page 289 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 5 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
parks and irrigation systems, includes but is not limited to, the upkeep, repair, removal or replacement of all or any part of the improvement or facility; grading and replacement of trail surfacing; trail fence repair and replacement; and irrigation systems control, adjustment, repair and replacement. Servicing means the furnishing of water for the irrigation of landscaping, the furnishing of electricity, gas or other illuminating energy for the lighting of landscaping or appurtenant facilities. This shall also include materials, vehicles, equipment, capital improvements and administrative costs associated with the annual administration and operation of the District. Services include personnel, materials, contracting services, utilities, and all necessary costs associated with the maintenance, replacement and repair required to keep the improvements in a healthy, vigorous and satisfactory condition. In addition, it is the City’s intention to continue to use cost effective materials, including the future ability to replace landscaping with drought resistant or low water use plants, in order to lower expenses of the District. The breakdown of maintained areas is as follows:

Parks: Ellena Park, Kenyon Park, Victoria Arbors Park, Victoria Groves Park, Vintage Park, and Windrows Park
Site # Descriptive Location
2-1 The west side of Arbor Ln from the traffic circle to Church St. The Arbor Ln median from Church St to the traffic circle. The east side of Arbor Ln from Long Meadow Dr to Church St. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Ln to Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from the west side of Arbor Ln to Saintsbury Pl. The north side of Winery Dr from Arbor Ln to 214 feet west of Arbor Ln. The south side of Long Meadow Dr from Freestone Ct to Duck Creek Pl.

Ground Cover area: 93,639 square feet
Hardscape area: 59,041 square feet
2-2 The northwest corner of Day Creek Blvd and Church St. The north side of Church St from Day Creek Blvd to 1,152 feet west of Hess Pl. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Dry Creek Dr. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Pineridge Pl. The west side of Hess Pl from the north side of Church St to Dry Creek Dr. The south side of Church St from 145 feet east of Hyssop Dr to 896 feet east of Hyssop Dr.

Ground Cover area: 24,018 square feet
Hardscape area: 26,617 square feet
2-3 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 250 feet north of Appellation Dr to Church St.

The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Church St to Madrigal Pl. The Day Creek Blvd median from Church St to Base Line Rd. The south side of Madrigal Pl from Day Creek Blvd to Round Hill Pl.

Ground Cover area: 35,420 square feet
Hardscape area: 42,671 square feet

Page 290 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 6 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
2-4 Victoria Park Ln from Base Line Rd to the east entrance of Victoria Arbor Park. The southwest corner of Victoria Park Ln and Base Line Rd. The southeast corner of Victoria Park Ln to 445 feet east of Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 36,482 square feet
Turf area: 3,874 square feet
Hardscape area: 32,927 square feet
2-5 The east and west side of Victoria Park Ln and the medians from Mosaic Dr to Church St.

Ground Cover area: 56,358 square feet
Hardscape area: 20,390 square feet
2-6 The north side of Church St from Arbor Ln to Day Creek Blvd. The northwest corner of Church St and Arbor Ln. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Wilson Creek Dr.

Ground Cover area: 21,616 square feet
Hardscape area: 15,159 square feet
2-7 The north side of Church St from Victoria Park Ln to Arbor Ln. The northwest corner of Victoria Park Ln and Church St. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Elk Cove Ct. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Freestone Ct. The northeast corner of Arbor Ln and Church St.

Ground Cover area: 16,609 square feet
Hardscape area: 13,730 square feet
2-8 The paseo from the west side of Etiwanda Ave to Silver Rose Ct. The north side of Church St from Etiwanda Ave to Victoria Park Ln. The east side of Iron Horse Pl from Church St to Wild Horse Pl. The paseo from the north side of Church St to Cloudy Bay Ct. The medians from Iron Horse Pl to Etiwanda Ave.

Ground Cover area: 35,122 square feet
Hardscape area: 28,473 square feet
2-9 The landscaped slope behind existing landscape of site 2-5 on the west side of Victoria Park Ln from 475 feet north of Long Meadow Dr to Long Meadow Dr. The landscape slope and curb adjacent parkway from Victoria Park Ln to 685 feet west of Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 26,213 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,617 square feet
VW-1 Base Line Rd median from Victoria Park Ln to 830 feet west of Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 4,514 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,474 square feet

Page 291 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 7 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VW-2 The north side of Base Line Rd 300 feet east and 200 feet west of Swanson Pl. The east and west sides of Swanson Pl from Base Line Rd to Province St. The paseo from the intersection of Swanson Pl and Province St to Atwood St with outlet to Dunmore Pl. The paseo from Atwood St to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Saratoga St from Powell Pl to Dunmore Pl. The paseo from Saratoga St to Etiwanda Ave. The south side of Atwood St from Victoria Park Ln to Travis Pl. The north side of Atwood St from Walcott Pl to Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 18,753 square feet
Turf area: 73,931 square feet
Hardscape area: 22,615 square feet
VW-3 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west and east side parkways from Base Line Rd to the entrance to Victoria Village.

Ground Cover area: 27,090 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,214 square feet
VW-4 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west and east side parkways from Victoria Village entrance to Atwood St.

Ground Cover area: 40,937 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,428 square feet
VW-5 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west side and east side parkways from Atwood St to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 49,513 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,467 square feet
VW-6 The paseo running north from 12732 Farrington St to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 285 square feet
Hardscape area: 679 square feet
VW-7 The paseo running north from 12840 Farrington St to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 266 square feet
Hardscape area: 552 square feet
VW-8 The Victoria Park Ln median and the west side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The Victoria Park Ln east side parkway from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Zinnia Ct.

Ground Cover area: 40,548 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,150 square feet

Page 292 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 8 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VW-9 The Victoria Park Ln east side parkway from Barberry St to North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park.

Ground Cover area:

Turf area:
40,004 square feet
11,779 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,720 square feet
VW-10 The west side of Victoria Park Ln from South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.

The Victoria Park Ln median from Zinnia Ct to Dahlia Ct. The east side of Victoria Park Ln from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Windrows Park to Dahlia Ct.

Ground Cover area: 50,620 square feet
Turf area: 11,878 square feet
Hardscape area: 11,400 square feet
VW-11 The east side parkway on South Victoria Windrows Loop from Silktassel Dr to Victoria Park Ln. The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from the intersection of South Victoria Windrows Loop and North Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The Victoria Park Ln median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Windrows Loop from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to Dahlia Ct.

Ground Cover area: 27,053 square feet
Turf area: 20,216 square feet
Hardscape area: 6,988 square feet
VW-12 The Victoria Park Ln median from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The parkway on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from the intersection of North and South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Silverberry St to Victoria Park Ln. The parkway on the south side of Silverberry St from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to North Victoria Windrows Loop.

Ground Cover area: 166,249 square feet
Turf area: 21,603 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,868 square feet
VW-13 The parkway on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to South Victoria Windrows Loop. The west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Ln to Snapdragon St.

Ground Cover area: 20,068 square feet
Turf area: 16,476 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,200 square feet

Page 293 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 9 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VW-14 The parkway on the west side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Snapdragon St to Victoria Park Ln. The parkway on the north and south side of Sugar Gum St from South Victoria Windrows Loop to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The parkways on the east and west sides of Basswood Pl from Sugar Gum St to Blazing Star Ct. The parkway on the north side of South Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Ln to Silktassel Dr.

Ground Cover area: 21,466 square feet
Turf area: 10,335 square feet
Hardscape area: 27,560 square feet
VW-15 The parkway on the north side of Bougainvillea Way from Peach Pl to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Citrus Pl. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Locus Ave and following that curb line to Silverberry St. The parkway on the north side of Silverberry St from North Victoria Windrows Loop 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Silverberry St to Nasturtium Dr. The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Locus Ave to Pistache St and continuing to Bougainvillea Way.

Ground Cover area: 45,929 square feet
Turf area: 12,207 square feet
Hardscape area: 23,630 square feet
VW-16 The south side of Highland Ave from 455 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to 534 feet east of Locus Ave. The east and west side of Locus Ave from Highland Ave to North Victoria Windrows Loop. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Citrus Pl east to Bougainvillea Way. The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Twinspur Pl to Locus Ave.

Ground Cover area: 26,577 square feet
Turf area: 23,922 square feet
Hardscape area: 19,203 square feet
VW-17 This site was modified and added to VW-16 on January 5, 1999.

VW-18 The south side of Highland Ave from 12583 Highland Ave to Rockrose Ave.

Ground Cover area: 2,800 square feet
Turf area: 8,515 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet

Page 294 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 10 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VW-19 The north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct to Rockrose Ave.

The east side of Rockrose Ave from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Highland Ave.

The south side of Highland Ave from Rockrose Ave to Etiwanda Ave. The horse trail from Highland Ave and Etiwanda Ave to the Fire Station.

Ground Cover area: 21,027 square feet
Turf area: 32,266 square feet
Hardscape area: 11,298 square feet
VW-20 The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Victoria Park Ln to Plum Way. The parkway on the west side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Plum Way to Rosemary Ct. The paseo from Tipu Pl east to the open field.

Note: The area in front of Windrows Park is watered by the VW-20 water meter, but it is maintained by City crews.

Ground Cover area: 2,110 square feet
Turf area: 16,411 square feet
Hardscape area: 9,132 square feet
VW-21 The east side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rosemary Ct to the trail south of Kalmia St. The trail and paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop south of Kalmia St to Etiwanda Ave and north to the Fire Station. The south side of Basil St from North Victoria Windrows Loop to Santolina Pl.

Ground Cover area: 49,187 square feet
Turf area: 36,461 square feet
Hardscape area: 19,600 square feet
Mulchscape: 21,071 square feet
VW-22 The paseo from North Victoria Windrows Loop at Rockrose Ave to the northeast corner of Windrows Park and from that corner to Plum Way.

Ground Cover area: 13,689 square feet
Turf area: 19,953 square feet
Hardscape area: 9,489 square feet
VW-23 The west side of Rockrose Ave from Highland Ave to North Victoria Windrows Loop.

The parkway on the north side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Rockrose Ave to Twinspur Pl. The parkway on the south side of North Victoria Windrows Loop from Bougainvillea Way to Rosemary Ct.

Ground Cover area: 18,299 square feet
Turf area: 3,452 square feet
Hardscape area: 10,352 square feet

Page 295 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 11 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VW-24 The Metropolitan Water District easement from Jasmine Ct and Ironbark Dr to Sweetgum Dr.

Ground Cover area: 475 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,730 square feet
VW-25 The north side of Base Line Rd from 384 feet west of Wanona Pl to Etiwanda Ave.

The west side of Etiwanda Ave from Base Line Rd to Craig Dr. The Base Line Rd median from Swanson Pl to Etiwanda Ave.

Ground Cover area: 20,934 square feet
Turf area: 3,079 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,799 square feet
VW-26 The paseo from Grape Pl to 630 feet west of Grape Pl.

Ground Cover area: 7,021 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,548 square feet
VW-27 The south side of Base Line Rd from 251 feet west of Swanson Pl to Etiwanda Ave.

The Base Line Rd median from Victoria Park Ln to Swanson Pl.

Ground Cover area: 18,816 square feet
Hardscape area: 17,233 square feet
VG-1 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland Ave from the Deer Creek Channel to Fairmont Way. The turf and ground cover from Highland Ave on the west side of Fairmont Way to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln south of the horse trail from 475 feet east of Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 275 feet east of Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The turf in the parkway on the east side of Fairmont Way from Victoria Park Ln to Highland Ave.

Ground Cover area: 21,573 square feet
Turf area: 47,604 square feet
Hardscape area: 17,300 square feet

Page 296 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 12 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VG-2 The turf on the east side of York Pl from Delaware St to Fairmont Way. The ground cover on the south side of Fairmont Way from York Pl and continuing on that curb line to Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln west of Milliken Ave from Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. The parkway on the west side of Milliken Ave from Victoria Park Ln to Fairmont Way. The Milliken Ave median from Fairmont Way to Victoria Park Ln. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 273 feet west of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave. The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln south of the horse trail from 468 feet west of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave.

Ground Cover area: 53,416 square feet
Turf area: 49,587 square feet
Hardscape area: 20,173 square feet
VG-3 The turf and ground cover north of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont Way from Nova Ct continuing on that curb line to York Pl and the turf south of the sidewalk on the north side of Fairmont Way from Armstrong Pl continuing on that curb line to York Pl. The ground cover on the west side of York Pl from Fairmont Way to Delaware St and the ground cover on the east side of York Pl. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Fairmont Way from Emerson St continuing along that curb line to Armstrong Pl. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Biola Pl.

Ground Cover area: 57,189 square feet
Turf area: 38,343 square feet
Hardscape area: 26,848 square feet
VG-4 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont Way from Armstrong Pl to Milliken Ave. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Milliken Ave from Fairmont Way to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The Milliken Ave median from Fairmont Way to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The ground cover on the north side of the Southern Pacific Railroad from Deer Creek Channel to Rochester Ave including the paseo to Baylor St. The ground cover on the north side of Fairmont Way from Milliken Ave to Nova Ct. The turf on the north side of Fairmont Way from Milliken Ave to Armstrong Pl.

Ground Cover area: 202,163 square feet
Turf area: 19,751 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,278 square feet
VG-5 The paseo from Biola Pl to Amarillo St to Delaware St at York Pl.

Ground Cover area: 12,448 square feet
Turf area: 44,896 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,992 square feet

Page 297 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 13 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VG-6 The paseo beginning at the northeast corner of Victoria Groves Park and Fairmont Way and extending to the Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 73,442 square feet
Turf area: 74,778 square feet
Hardscape area: 16,629 square feet
VG-7 The paseo that begins on the south side of Donnelly St at Fairmont Way and continues to the Deer Creek Channel including the southward extension on the west side of Albright Pl from Donnelly St to Pacific and the paseo from Pacific to Charleston St.

Ground Cover area: 43,427 square feet
Turf area: 51,765 square feet
Hardscape area: 15,806 square feet
VG-8 The ground cover on the west side of Milliken Ave from 566 feet north of Victoria Park Ln to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover and turf north of the horse trail on Victoria Park Ln from Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont Way from Victoria Park Ln to 156 feet north of Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 21,614 square feet
Turf area: 8,614 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,281 square feet
VG-9 The ground cover on the east side of Fairmont Way from 156 feet north of Victoria Park Ln to Kenyon Way. The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon Way from Fairmont Way to 197 feet east of Fairmont Way. The turf on the south side of Kenyon Way from Fairmont Way to 316 feet east of Fairmont Way. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Baltimore Dr from Fairmont Way to Baltimore Ct.

The turf and ground cover on the north side of Baltimore Dr from Fairmont Way to Vanderbilt Pl. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Vanderbilt Pl from Baltimore Dr to Brown Dr. The paseo from Vanderbilt Pl and Brown Dr to Kenyon Way.

Ground Cover area: 48,481 square feet
Turf area: 11,357 square feet
Hardscape area: 13,542 square feet

Page 298 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 14 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VG-10 The ground cover on the south side of Kenyon Way from 197 feet east of Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. The turf on the south side of Kenyon Way from 316 feet east of Fairmont Way to Milliken Ave. The ground cover on the west side of Milliken Ave from Kenyon Way to 566 feet north of Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Capitol Pl from Brown Dr to Bethany Dr. The paseo from Capitol Pl and Brown Dr to Kenyon Way.

Ground cover area: 34,241 square feet
Turf area: 11,031 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,320 square feet
VG-11 The east and west side parkways and median of Milliken Ave from Base Line Rd to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The north side of Base Line Rd from 542 feet east of Milliken Ave to Milliken Ave.

Ground Cover area: 31,367 square feet
Turf area: 17,264 square feet
Hardscape area: 25,524 square feet
VG-12 The turf and ground cover on the south side of Fairmont Way from the southeast corner of Milliken Ave and Fairmont Way along the curb line to Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground over on the west side of Fairmont Way from the southwest corner of Victoria Park Ln and Fairmont Way (located east of Milliken Ave) and continuing along the curb line to Milliken Ave. The turf on the east side of Milliken Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 730 feet south of Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to 766 feet south of Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 53,068 square feet
Turf area: 36,431 square feet
Hardscape area: 27,004 square feet
VG-13 The paseos from Victoria Park Ln to Verona Dr, Verona Dr to Napoli Dr, and Genova Rd to Tivoli Pl.

Ground Cover area: 17,993 square feet
Turf area: 16,344 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,376 square feet

Page 299 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 15 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VG-14 The Base Line Rd median from Milliken Ave to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line Rd from Ellena East to Ellena West. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena West from Base Line Rd and following the curb line to Kenyon Way. The north side of Ellena West from Kenyon Way to Casoli Pl. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Casoli Pl from Ellena West to Candela Dr. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Crema Pl from Ellena West to Candela Dr.

Ground Cover area: 89,456 square feet
Turf area: 62,999 square feet
Hardscape area: 44,826 square feet
VG-15 The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester Ave from the Southern Pacific Railroad to Base Line Rd. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Base Line Rd from Rochester Ave to Ellena East. The Base Line Rd Median from Rochester Ave to Ellena East. The turf and ground cover on the east side of Ellena East from Base Line Rd and continuing along that curb line to 275 feet north of Berra Rd. The turf and ground cover on both sides of Berra Rd from Ellena East to Comiso Way.

Ground Cover area: 58,588 square feet
Turf area: 57,306 square feet
Hardscape area: 36,014 square feet
VG-16 The paseo from Base Line Rd to Ellena West with entrances to Amelia Dr and Pavola Dr.

Ground Cover area: 9,661 square feet
Turf area: 11,529 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,804 square feet
VG-17 The paseo from Fairmont Way to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Fabriano Pl to Martano Pl.

Ground Cover area: 35,351 square feet
Turf area: 40,291 square feet
Hardscape area: 16,394 square feet
VG-18 The paseo from Rapallo Dr to Gandino Dr and south to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 4,281 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,308 square feet
VG-19 The paseo from Tolentino Dr to Pizolli Pl and to Tolentino Dr.

Ground Cover area: 12,555 square feet
Turf area: 17,856 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,380 square feet

Page 300 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 16 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VG-20 The turf on the east side of Milliken Ave from 730 feet south of Victoria Park Ln to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the east side of Milliken Ave from 766 feet south of Victoria Park Ln to Victoria Park Ln. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from the southeast corner at Milliken Ave heading east to Fairmont Way. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from Parma Pl to the northeast corner of Milliken Ave and Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the west side of Parma Pl from Victoria Park Ln to Lomello Way. The Victoria Park Ln median from Milliken Ave to Pandino Ct. The Milliken Ave median from Victoria Park Ln to 440 feet south of Kenyon Way. The parkway on the west side of Milliken Ave from 420 feet south of Kenyon Way to Victoria Park Ln.

Ground Cover area: 96,750 square feet
Turf area: 77,461 square feet
Hardscape area: 22,177 square feet
VG-21 The ground cover on the east side of Parma Pl from Victoria Park Ln to Lomello Way.

The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from Parma Pl to 653 feet east of Kenyon Way. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from Parma Pl to 547 feet east of Kenyon Way. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from Fairmont Way to 422 feet east of Kenyon Way. The turf and ground cover on the east and west sides of Kenyon Way from Victoria Park Ln to the Southern Pacific Railroad. The paseo from Kenyon Way to Rapallo Dr. The paseo from Kenyon Way to Bari Dr. The Victoria Park Ln median from Pandino Ct to Portofino Dr.

Ground Cover area: 85,865 square feet
Turf area: 41,994 square feet
Hardscape area: 34,478 square feet
VG-22 The ground cover on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 653 feet east of Kenyon Way to Rochester Ave. The turf on the north side of Victoria Park Ln from 547 feet east of Kenyon Way to Rochester Ave. The Victoria Park Ln median from Portofino Dr to Rochester Ave. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln north of the sidewalk from Kenyon Way to the east side of Vintage Park. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Victoria Park Ln from the east side of Vintage Park to Rochester Ave. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Rochester Ave from Victoria Park Ln to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 115,144 square feet
Turf area: 57,927 square feet
Hardscape area: 20,863 square feet

Page 301 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 17 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VG-23 The turf and ground cover on the east side of Kenyon Way from Victoria Park Ln to 409 feet west of Grimaldi Rd. The ground cover on the south side of Portofino Dr from Kenyon Way to Bergano Pl. The turf and ground cover on the north and south side of Lark Dr from Kenyon Way to the west property line of Rancho Cucamonga High School. The ground cover on the east and west side of Matera Pl from Lark Dr to Pescara Rd. The ground cover on the north and south side of Grimaldi Rd from Kenyon Way to Brindisi Ct. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Kenyon Way from Lark Dr to Victoria Park Ln. The ground cover on the north and south side of Marcello Way from Kenyon Way to Landriano Pl. The paseo from southwest corner of Kenyon Park to Kenyon Way.

Ground Cover area: 63,733 square feet
Turf area: 82,565 square feet
Hardscape area: 39,297 square feet
VG-24 The north side of Kenyon Way from Autumn Glen Ct to Woodruff Pl. The east side of Woodruff Pl from Kenyon Way to 403 feet north of Kenyon Way.

Ground Cover area: 8,447 square feet
Turf area: 5,320 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,622 square feet
VG-25 The paseo west of Torino Rd from Kenyon Way to Highland Ave. The turf and ground cover on the south side of Highland Ave from the northwest corner of Tract 13440 to the east end of Tract 13440.

Ground Cover area: 40,800 square feet
Turf area: 24,134 square feet
Hardscape area: 14,353 square feet
VG-26 The paseo from Brindisi Ct to Messina Pl. The turf and ground cover on the north side of Brindisi Ct to the end of the cul-de-sac. The turf and ground cover on the west side of Messina Pl from the paseo to Treviso Way.

Ground Cover area: 18,905 square feet
Turf area: 1,141 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,615 square feet
VG-27 The Milliken Ave median from 440 feet south of Kenyon Way to Highland Ave. The parkway on the west side of Milliken Ave from 420 feet south of Kenyon Way.

Ground Cover area: 4,030 square feet
Turf area: 3,006 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,222 square feet
VG-28 The east side of Rochester Ave from Victoria Park Ln to Highland Ave.

Ground Cover area: 60,902 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,593 square feet

Page 302 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 18 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VG-29 The north side of Kenyon Way from Milliken Ave to Fairmont Way. The groundcover on the east side of Fairmont Way, east of the sidewalk, from Kenyon Way to the 210 freeway.

Ground Cover area: 20,178 square feet
Turf area: 16,877 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,736 square feet
VG-30 The south side of Tresenda Dr from Santo Pl to Sappada Pl. The paseo from Sappada Pl to Carano Pl. The south side of Montella Dr from Carano Pl to Trivento Pl.

Ground Cover area: 6,797 square feet
Turf area: 2,462 square feet
Hardscape area: 4,860 square feet
VG-31 The east side of Brienza Pl from Larino Dr to Letini Dr. The west side of Tindari Pl from Letini Dr to Larino Dr. The greenbelt on the south side of Marconi Pl from Trivento Pl to Comiso Way. The east side of Comiso Way from Scalea Pl to Santo Pl.

Ground Cover area: 23,419 square feet
Turf area: 18,351 square feet
Hardscape area: 13,764 square feet
VG-32 The north side of Candela Dr from Terni Pl to Bettola Pl.

Ground Cover area: 20,172 square feet
Turf area: 8,190 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,292 square feet
VG-33 The paseo at the north end of Sapri Pl to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 894 square feet
Hardscape area: 318 square feet
VG-34 The paseo at the north end of Bronte Pl to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 894 square feet
Hardscape area: 318 square feet
VG-35 The east side of Rochester Ave from 555 feet south of Palmi Dr to Victoria Park Ln.

The south side of Victoria Park Ln and median from Rochester Ave to east side of Deer Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 53,646 square feet
Turf area: 11,150 square feet
Hardscape area: 17,555 square feet

Page 303 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 19 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VG-36 The north side of Victoria Park Ln from the east side of Deer Creek Channel to Rochester Ave.

Ground Cover area: 55,780 square feet
Turf area: 10,500 square feet
Hardscape area: 8,004 square feet
VG-37 The paseo at the end of Ardmoor Ct to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 1,350 square feet
Hardscape area: 950 square feet
VG-38 The east side of Milliken Ave from 106 feet north of Victoria Park Ln to Kenyon Way.

The north and south side of Spring Mist Dr from Milliken Ave to Summerstone Ct. The south side of Kenyon Way from Milliken Ave to Kenyon Park.

Ground Cover area: 28,051 square feet
Turf area: 4,533 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,879 square feet
VG-39 The north side of Victoria Park Ln from Kenyon Way paseo to 132 feet east of Milliken Ave. The Kenyon Way paseo from Victoria Park Ln to Fairwinds Ct. The paseo from Victoria Park Ln to the south west corner of Kenyon Park.

Ground Cover area: 55,089 square feet
Turf area: 13,120 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,676 square feet
VG-40 The south side of Highland Ave from 413 feet west of Highland Ave paseo to Highland Ave paseo. The east side of Highland Ave paseo from Highland Ave to Kenyon Way.

The north side of Kenyon Way from Highland Ave paseo to Autumn Glen Ct.

Ground Cover area: 56,553 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,314 square feet
VG-41 The west side of Rochester Ave from 294 feet south of Highland Ave to Lark Dr. The north side of Lark Dr from Rochester Ave to 1230 feet west of Rochester Ave.

Ground Cover area: 31,413 square feet
Hardscape area: 13,338 square feet
VG-42 The south side of Highland Ave from 1,314 feet west of Rochester Ave to Rochester Ave. The west side of Rochester Ave from Highland Ave to 294 feet south of Highland Ave. The north side of Highland Ave from Rochester Ave to Woodruff Pl.

Ground Cover area: 40,346 square feet
Hardscape area: 15,445 square feet

Page 304 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 20 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VG-43 The north side of Victoria Park Ln and the median from Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Channel. The east and west side of Kensington Pl from Victoria Park Ln to Stratford Dr.

Ground Cover area: 70,669 square feet
Turf area: 7,888 square feet
Hardscape area: 18,426 square feet
VG-44 The west side of Day Creek Blvd from 572 feet north of Silverberry St to Day Creek Blvd. The south side of Silverberry St from Kensington Pl to Day Creek Blvd.

Ground Cover area: 36,835 square feet
Hardscape area: 24,376 square feet
VG-45 The west side of Milliken Ave and the Milliken Ave median from the 210 freeway to Kenyon Way.

Ground Cover area: 10,658 square feet
Turf area: 610 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,589 square feet
VG-46 The Base Line Rd median from 657 feet east of Virginia Pl to Rochester Ave. The north side of Base Line Rd from 278 feet east of Virginia Pl to Rochester Ave. The paseo from the northeast corner of Rochester Ave and Base Line Rd to Huntley Dr.

The east side of Rochester Ave from Base Line Rd to 105 feet north of Shenandoah Dr.

Ground Cover area: 35,823 square feet
Hardscape area: 23,645 square feet
VG-47 The north side of Base Line Rd from 400 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. Base Line Rd median from Day Creek Blvd to 595 feet east of Day Creek Blvd.

Ground Cover area: 9,515 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,926 square feet
VG-48 The east side of Day Creek Blvd and median from Base Line Rd to Victoria Park Ln.

The south side of Victoria Park Ln from Day Creek Blvd to 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd.

Ground Cover area: 50,318 square feet
Turf area: 3,234 square feet
Hardscape area: 29,217 square feet

Page 305 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 21 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VG-49 The north side of Victoria Park Ln and median from 390 feet east of Day Creek Blvd to Day Creek Blvd. The east side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Ln to Highland Ave. The south side of Highland Ave from Day Creek Blvd to 440 feet east of Day Creek Blvd.

Ground Cover area: 51,459 square feet
Turf area: 3,930 square feet
Hardscape area: 32,296 square feet
VG-50 The west side of San Carmela Ct from 389 feet north of Base Line Rd to Base Line Rd. The north side of Base Line Rd from Carmela Ct to 264 feet west of Durness Pl.

Ground Cover area: 18,043 square feet
Hardscape area: 12,383 square feet
VG-51 The Paseo south of Saxon Dr to Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 1,398 square feet
Hardscape area: 969 square feet
VG-52 The north side of Sugar Gum St from Milliken Ave to Kensington Pl. The south side of Sugar Gum St from Milliken Ave to 111 feet east of Suffolk Pl.

Ground Cover area: 4,362 square feet
Hardscape area: 3,325 square feet
VG-53 The south side of Victoria Park Ln from 296 feet west of Kensington Pl to Milliken Ave.

The west side of Day Creek Blvd from Victoria Park Ln to 397 feet south of Sugar Gum St.

Ground Cover area: 28,532 square feet
Turf area: 11,070 square feet
Hardscape area: 7,720 square feet
VG-54 The east side of Rochester Ave from Shenandoah Dr to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 6,864 square feet
Hardscape area: 5,136 square feet
VG-55 The paseo north of Westhaven Pl to the Southern Pacific Railroad.

Ground Cover area: 1,775 square feet
Hardscape area: 2,575 square feet

Page 306 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 22 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
VG-56 The south side of Highland Ave from 1,317 feet west of Day Creek Blvd to 1,085 feet west of Day Creek Blvd including the non-irrigated slope on the south side of the sidewalk.

Ground Cover area: 5,274 square feet
Hardscape area: 1,761 square feet
VG-57 The north side of Highland Ave from Fairmont Way to the Day Creek Channel.

Ground Cover area: 16,157 square feet
Hardscape area: 17,405 square feet
VG-58 The south side of Kenyon Wy from the Kenyon Park paseo entrance to Lark Dr. The south side of Lark Dr. from 568 feet west of Kenyon Wy to Kenyon Wy. The paseo east of Kenyon Park from Kenyon Wy to the east/west paseo of site VG-23.

Ground Cover area: 24,072 square feet
Hardscape area: 9,807 square feet
Ground cover, shrubs and turf areas that make up parkways, median islands and paseos are maintained under contract by a private landscape maintenance company. Parks are maintained by the City's Park Maintenance Crews.

Map of Improvements
The following page shows the approximate location (for reference only – may not include all) of landscaping improvements, including irrigation sites, and parks and community trails to be maintained by the District.

Page 307 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 23 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2

Page 308 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 24 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2

ESTIMATE OF COSTS
The estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements as described in the Plans and Specifications are summarized below. Each year, as part of the District levy calculation process, the costs and expenses are reviewed and the annual costs are projected for the following fiscal year.

District Budget
Fiscal Year
2022/23 Budget
Expenditures
Personnel Services:

Regular Salaries 603,190$
Overtime Salaries 1,090
Part-time Salaries 62,900
Fringe Benefits 320,130
Subtotal - Personnel 987,310
Operations and Maintenance:

Operations and Maintenance:

O & M/General 90,300
Emergency Equipment and Vehicle Rental 200
Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 90,500
Contract Services:

Contract Services/General 1,368,240
Tree Maintenance 263,320
Contract Vehicle Maintenance and Repair 5,000
Subtotal - Contract Services 1,636,560
Utilities:

Water Utilities 952,430
Electric Utilities 51,160
Subtotal - Utilities 1,003,590
Assessment Administration 24,760
Admin./General Overhead 364,420
Interfund Allocation 83,160
Subtotal - Operations and Maintenance 3,202,990
Capital Expenditures:

Captial Outlay - Equipment 28,790
Captial Outlay - Improvements Other Than Building 25,000 Captial Projects 2,086,450
Subtotal - Capital Expenditures 2,140,240
Total Expenditures Budget 6,330,540$

Page 309 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 25 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
Fiscal Year
2022/23 Budget
Revenues
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 3,846,420$ Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 27,410
Subtotal - Taxes 3,873,830
Other Revenues:

Interest Earnings 29,800
Park Maintenance Fees 960
Subtotal - Other Revenues: 30,760
Transfer In:

Transfer In - General Fund 318,570
Total Revenues Budget 4,223,160
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (2,107,380)$
Total Gross Estimated Assessments 3,847,733.29$
Total District EBU Count 81,554.33
Actual Assessment per EBU - Fiscal Year 2022/23 47.18$
Each year, prior to the assessments being placed on the tax roll, the City will review the budget and determine the amount needed to maintain the improvements for the upcoming fiscal year.

The actual assessment per Equivalent Benefit Unit (“EBU”) will be based on the total amount of funds needed to maintain the improvements in a satisfactory and healthy condition. The actual assessment amount may be the same or lower than the maximum allowable assessment; however, it may not exceed the maximum after the application of the cost of living inflator, as defined in this report, unless the excess increase is approved by the property owners in accordance with Proposition 218.

It is the intent of the City to maintain an Operating Reserve which shall not exceed the estimated costs of maintenance and servicing of the improvements prior to December 10 of the fiscal year, or when the City expects to receive its apportionment of special assessments and tax collections from the County, whichever is later. The reserve balance information for the District is as follows:

Operating Reserve
Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2022 4,043,122$ Contribution to/(Use of) Reserve - Fiscal Year 2022/23 (2,107,380) Estimated Reserve Fund Balance, June 30, 2023 1,935,742$

Page 310 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 26 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
Definitions of Budget Items
The following definitions describe the costs and expenses included in the District Budget for the maintenance and servicing of the improvements:

Operations and Maintenance: This item includes the costs of City staff to perform maintenance duties within the boundaries of the District.

Contract Services: This item includes the contract costs of a landscape maintenance company responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the District improvements.

This item also includes creation of an annual Engineer's Report, resolutions and placing the assessment amounts onto the County tax roll each year, along with responding to any public inquiries and future Proposition 218 balloting proceedings.

Other Revenues: This includes other revenues that are not levied through the annual assessments that support the District operations. These other revenues may include: interest earnings, other rental/lease income (cell site tower leases), Park Maintenance Fees, Sports Field User Group Rentals, and parking permits (Metrolink Station paid parking).

Page 311 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 27 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2

BENEFITS FROM IMPROVEMENTS AND QUANTIFICATION
Benefits from Improvements
The improvements previously defined are expected to confer certain special benefits to parcels within the District. The benefits are described below.

Sidewalks and Community Trails
People walk for a variety of reasons, whether the reason is to commute to work or school, run errands, shop, leisure activities, fitness, or some other purpose. To enhance the overall walking experience, pedestrians seek out and utilize sidewalk facilities and community trails that are in close proximity to their property and provide a safe place to walk as well as an environment that provides a certain amount of visual interest. Sidewalks and community trails serve as a critical component in the transportation network providing users access to parks and recreational areas, schools, commercial areas, and neighbors. According to the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) sidewalks provide many benefits including safety, mobility and healthier communities (FHWA, n.d). Improved Aesthetics: A survey conducted by DMB (an Arizona based commercial developer) found that there was a strong demand for communities characterized by pedestrian access, a sense of connection, and a sense of community and diversity (Urban Land Institute, 2006). According to the Urban Land Institute report Creating Walkable Places: Compact Mixed-Use Solutions, people want their neighborhoods to provide more opportunities to walk (Urban Land Institute, 2006). A survey sponsored by the Surface Transportation Policy Project found that 55% of respondents would like to walk more, 63% would like to run errands on foot and walk to stores, and 79% would like sidewalks and other places to walk and exercise (Urban Land Institute, 2006). The continued maintenance of the inter-connecting sidewalks and community trails improves the livability and appeal for properties within the District. Increased Safety: According to the FHWA, sidewalks reduce roadway accidents, including pedestrian/motor vehicle accidents. In addition, roadways without sidewalks are more than twice as likely to have pedestrians involved in accidents compared to sites with sidewalks on both sides of the street (FHWA, n.d.). In 2008, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration’s (NHTSA) National Pedestrian Crash Report identified California as one of the states with the highest number of pedestrian deaths (NHTSA, 2008).
Economic Activity: Uniform and well-maintained sidewalk and community trail improvements create cohesion throughout the District. This cohesion enhances both the residential and retail experience as well as encourages maximum use of building and lot area. According to Active Living Research (2010), economic benefits of walkable developments include enhanced marketability and faster sales or leases than conventional development. The National Complete Streets Coalition notes that street

Page 312 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 28 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
design that is inclusive of all modes of transportation, where appropriate, not only improves conditions for and access to existing businesses, but also is a proven method for attracting new development (Pugliese, 2008).

Street Landscaping
The overall appeal and safety of an area is enhanced when landscaping improvements are in place and kept in a healthy and satisfactory condition. Conversely, appeal and safety decreases when landscaping is overgrown, unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. Improved Aesthetics: Street landscaping improvements improve the livability, commercial activity, appearance and desirability for properties within the boundaries of the District. Regular maintenance ensures that the improvements do not reach a state of deterioration or disrepair so as to be materially detrimental to properties adjacent to or in close proximity to the improvements within the District. According to the Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011), streetscapes have a significant effect on how people view and interact with their community. With streetscapes that are safe and inviting, people are more likely to walk, which can help reduce automobile traffic, improve public health, stimulate local economic activity and attract residents to the community. Increased Safety: Safety for pedestrians involves not only a degree of protection from vehicular accidents, but also from criminal activity. Well maintained areas mitigate crime, especially vandalism, and enhance pedestrian safety. A recent study has found that after landscape improvements were installed, there was a 46% decrease in crash rates across urban arterial and highway sites and a second study reviewed found a 5% to 20% reduction in mid-block crashes after trees and planters in urban arterial roads were put in place. In addition, there is less graffiti, vandalism, and littering in outdoor spaces with natural landscapes than in comparable plant-less spaces (Wolf, 2010). The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) has found that streetscapes reduce traffic speeds, and when combined with improved pedestrian crossing conditions, can significantly reduce collisions. Furthermore, maintained sidewalks and trails increase pedestrian safety by reducing the number of trips and falls from those using the improvements.
Economic Activity: Well-maintained street landscape improvements not only make adjacent properties appear more stable and prosperous, but can spur investment in the property. According to the FHWA, landscaped sidewalks create an inviting place for customers to shop and do business (FHWA, 2001).

Parks
Park facilities enhance the overall quality of an area and are an important component of complete and sustainable neighborhoods. Neighborhood parks offer both active and passive recreational opportunities: a place to play, exercise, spend time with neighbors, or relax. The parks within the District are developed and maintained to appeal to all age groups and interests,

Page 313 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 29 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
and promote a healthy community. Recreation and park facilities have proven to be a potent factor in maintaining a high standard of livability in the community. Improved Aesthetics. The park improvements provide beautification, shade and enhancement to properties, which creates a sense of community for the parcels within the District. The overall appeal and desirability of an area is enhanced when public parks and recreational facilities are in place, improved, operable, safe, clean and maintained. Conversely, appeal and desirability decrease when park and recreational facilities are unsafe or destroyed by the elements or vandalism. According to The Trust for Public Land, Corporate CEOs say that employee quality of life is the third most important factor in locating new businesses (Harnik and Welle, n.d.). Economic Activity: Parks attract both businesses and residents to communities.

According to The Trust for Public Land, small company owners say recreation, parks and open spaces in close proximity to properties used for business purposes are the highest priority in choosing a new location for their businesses.

As a result of the collective improvements (sidewalks, community trails, street landscaping and parks) being maintained, the overall livability for properties within the District will increase.

Livability encompasses several qualities and characteristics that are unique to a specific area.

The Victoria Transport Policy Institute (2011) expands on the concept of livability and the various benefits associated with that designation:

The livability of an area increases property desirability and business activity. Livability is largely affected by conditions in the public realm, places where people naturally interact with each other and their community, including streets, parks, transportation terminals and other public facilities. Livability also refers to the environmental and social quality of an area as perceived by employees, customers and visitors. This includes local environmental conditions, the quality of social interactions, opportunities for recreation and entertainment, aesthetics, and existence of unique cultural and environmental resources.

Quantification of Benefit
As a result of the District maintenance and servicing activities, there will be a level of general benefits to people that do not live in or intend to conduct business within the District. In order for property within the District to be assessed only for that portion of special benefits received from the District maintenance and servicing activities, general benefits provided by the ongoing maintenance and servicing of the improvements needs to be quantified. The amount of general benefit that is provided from the District maintenance activities cannot be funded via property owners’ assessments.

The District currently consists of 5,890 single family residences, 972 condominium units, 729 multi-family (apartment) units, 57.97 acres of commercial property, 4 schools, 1 Church, 1 fire

Page 314 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 30 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
station, and 16.97 acres of undeveloped property. Properties are classified by their land use code as shown on San Bernardino County’s latest secured roll.

Sidewalks and Community Trails
The City is comprised of many smaller communities located throughout the City. Most of the communities have parks and schools that are proximate to and serve the residents in their immediate vicinity. There are four schools in addition to the six parks within the District. Two of the four schools have school District boundaries that are only within the District. However, two of the schools include areas outside of the District as part of their school district boundaries.

The primary reason persons living outside the District would enter the District would be to access the schools. Therefore, we must consider the school district boundary areas outside of the District when analyzing the pedestrian traffic that may use the sidewalks and community trails within the District.

The Summary of Travel Trends, 2009 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) prepared by the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA, 2011) analyzed the number of person trips by various modes of transportations such as private vehicle, transit, walking or some other means of transportation. According to the Pacific Division data extracted from the 2009 NHTS database, of the annual 181,703 (in millions) total person trips, 21,252 (in millions) or 11.70% of those person trips were made by using walking as their mode of transportation (FHWA, 2011).

According to the U.S. Census Bureau (2010), the average household size in the City is 2.98 persons. Based on this average household size, and considering there are 6,957 residential units within the District, there are approximately 20,732 people residing within the District boundaries. There are an estimated 12,000 residential units within the school district boundaries that are not within the boundaries of the District. Based on the City’s average household size, there are approximately 35,760 persons residing outside of the District boundaries, but within the school district boundaries. The following shows the estimated number of residential units and persons within the school district boundaries and either within or outside the District boundaries:

School District Population
Estimated
Number of
Residential Units
Estimated
Number of
Persons
Within District Boundaries 6,957 20,732
Outside District Boundaries 12,000 35,760
Total Population 18,957 56,492
In order to determine the estimated total number of persons who are within close proximity to the sidewalk and trail improvements, and would utilize walking as their mode of transportation, we applied the 11.70% of person trips reported from the NHTS Pacific Division study, to the total number of persons within District and school district boundaries (56,492). There are

Page 315 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 31 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
approximately 6,610 people within proximity of the District that utilize walking as their mode of transportation.

Applying the 2009 NHTS walking trip percentage to the District population (20,732), we estimate that of the 6,610 persons who are within close proximity of the District and use walking as their primary mode of transportation, 2,426 people are within the District boundaries. Therefore, the total surrounding neighborhood area population, located outside of the District boundaries, but in close proximity to the sidewalk and trail improvements, who use walking as their primary mode of transportation is estimated to be 4,184 people.

School District Population
Estimated Number
of Persons
Within District Boundaries 2,426
Outside District Boundaries 4,184
Total Population – uses walking as
primary mode of transportation 6,610
In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the sidewalk and community trail improvements, the pedestrian traffic that utilizes walking as the mode of transportation that will seek out and use sidewalks and community trails within the District’s boundaries, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 21,252 (in millions) reported walking trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the sidewalks and community trails within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: walking to school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and shopping or running errands.

The following details the number of walking trips, based on the 2009 NHTS study, for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the sidewalk and community trail improvements within the District:

Trip Purpose
Number of Walking
Trips (in millions)
School/Daycare/Religious Activity 872
Shopping/Errands 5,820
Social/Recreational 2,268
Don’t know/Other 139
Total 9,099
Of the total number of walking trips reported, 9,099 (in millions) or 42.81% are for purposes that persons outside of the District would utilize the sidewalk and trail improvements within the District. Applying this percentage (42.81%) to the number of people using walking as their mode of transportation and that live outside of the District (4,184), but use the sidewalks and community trails within the District, there are approximately 1,791 people using the maintained sidewalks and community trails for general benefit purposes. The persons engaging in general benefit activities represents 3.17% of the total school district population (56,492), and is therefore considered to be District general benefit.

Page 316 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 32 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
School District Boundary General
Benefit 3.17%
Given the location and nature of the improvements, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use the sidewalks and trails within the District, but would use those proximate to their own properties. The City has regional trails that connect different areas of the City, and those trails do appeal to and attract other residents of the City as well as residents that live outside the City. Nevertheless, it is likely that certain members of the public at large use the sidewalks or community trails within the District. As such, we have assigned a 1.00% general benefit for the sidewalk and community trails to the public at large.

Public at large General Benefit 1.00%
Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the sidewalk and trail improvements is estimated to be 4.17% and the special benefit is estimated to be 95.83%.

Sidewalk and Trail General Benefit 4.17%
Street Landscaping
Based upon the City’s General Plan (2010) Roadway Hierarchy, the streets within the District are classified into one of the following categories: arterial, collector, or local (minor) streets.

The majority of street landscaping is located along roads classified as collector and local streets and primarily situated within the public right-of-ways of the internal local street network. A portion of the maintained landscaping is, however, located along the arterial streets, and, as such, provides some general benefit to pass-through traffic.

Local Streets
For purposes of determining general and special benefits, all streets within the District other than the specific streets listed as collector and arterial streets below are considered local streets. The local streets within the District were intended to serve individual neighborhoods and not to be pass-through streets, but cul-de-sacs or loop roads to reduce through traffic (Victoria Community Plan, 1980). In addition, according to the City’s General Plan (2010), the primary intended purpose of local streets is to serve fronting properties.

From a visual inspection of the layout of the District one must conclude that the purpose of the local streets is exclusively intended for the benefit of the parcels on such streets. There is no local street that provides a direct or efficient means of traveling from one place to another such that one could reasonably expect a driver to purposefully choose the District’s local streets as the best route for travel unless necessary because the route either began or ended with a parcel in the District. A route beginning or ending with a parcel within the District does not include the “general public” for purposes of determining general benefit.

Page 317 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 33 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
However, one can imagine a minimal degree of pass through traffic even on something such as a cul-de-sac. As expressed by the Court in Beutz v. County of Riverside (2010), “... courts of this state have long recognized that virtually all public improvement projects provide general benefits."
Given the location to the schools, parks, and shopping in the City, there are bound to be drivers that make use of the local streets for no other reason but to turn around or go back from where they came, especially if they are dropping their children off at one of the schools. Additionally, given the nature of the street landscaping, one could imagine a small degree of “residential tourism” wherein drivers are in fact simply “passing through” to enjoy the beautiful views of the homes, the natural surroundings or visiting friends. A conservative estimate of 1.00% for each scenario would result in the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increase safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements on local streets to be 2.00% and the special benefit is estimated to be 98.00%.

Local Street General Benefit 2.00%
Collector Streets: Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St Because of the similarities in use, layout, type, and designation, the benefits of Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St are considered to be equal. Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St border the District and are used as the main access to and from properties within the District. Victoria Park Ln serves as the main access point to each of the four schools and is the connector street running through the District. Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St connect the various neighborhoods, schools and parks within the District in addition to providing circulation between the local streets and the arterial network. As such, we must also consider the neighborhoods that surround the District and are within the school district boundaries, but not within the actual District when analyzing vehicle traffic that may use the streets within the District. The City’s Traffic Study (2009) does not include the traffic volume and number of daily trips on the connector streets within the District. As such a study is unavailable at this time we have use the NHTS Pacific Division data in order to estimate the number of drivers who use the streets within the District.

According to the Pacific Division data extracted from the NHTS database, of the annual 181,703 (in millions) total person trips, 152,827 (in millions) or 84.11% of those trips were made using a personal motor vehicle (FHWA, 2011). According to the 2001 National Household Travel Survey, household file, U.S. Department of Transportation (2001), the mean drivers per household is 1.75. Based on the drivers per household average, and considering the 6,957 households within the District, there are approximately 12,175 drivers within the District. There are an estimated 12,000 residential units within the school district boundaries that are not within the boundaries of the District. Based on the drivers per household average, there are approximately 21,000 additional drivers that reside outside of the District boundaries, but are in close proximity to the District.

Page 318 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 34 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
School District Population
Estimated
Number of
Residential Units
Estimated
Number of
Drivers
Within District Boundaries 6,957 12,175
Outside District Boundaries 12,000 21,000
Total 18,957 33,175
Applying the percentage of vehicle trips (84.11%) reported from the NHTS Pacific Division study to the District and school district boundaries area outside of the District population sets (33,175), approximately 27,903 people are within proximity of the District that utilize a private vehicle as their primary mode of transportation. Applying the 2009 NHTS vehicle trip percentage to the estimated number of drivers within the District (12,175) approximately 10,240 people within the District boundaries use a personal vehicle as their primary mode of transportation. Therefore, the total surrounding neighborhood area population, located outside of the District boundaries, that uses a vehicle as their mode of transportation is estimated to be 17,663 people.

School District Population
Estimated Number
of Persons
Within District Boundaries 10,240
Outside District Boundaries 17,663
Total Population – uses personal vehicle
as primary mode of transportation 27,903
In order to obtain a better picture of the overall level of general benefit provided by the improvements, the vehicle traffic that will seek out and use the collector streets to access parcel’s within the District, but live outside of the District, must be considered. The 2009 NHTS further details the purposes of the 152,827 (in millions) reported vehicle trips. Based on the property types within the District, people utilizing the collector streets to access properties within the District would most likely do so for the following reasons: attend school, day care or religious activity, social or recreational activities, and to shop or run errands.

The following details the number of vehicle trips for each of the activities that are the most likely reasons people outside of the District would use the collector streets to access properties within the District:

Trip Purpose
Number of Vehicle
Trips (in millions)
School/Daycare/Religious Activity 6,470
Shopping/Errands 30,998
Social/Recreational 16,185
Don’t know/Other 688
Total 54,341
Of the total number of vehicle trips reported, 54,341 (in millions) or 35.56% are for purposes that persons outside of the District would most likely utilize the collector streets within the District.

Applying this percentage to the number of people using vehicles as their primary mode of

Page 319 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 35 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
transportation and live outside of the District (17,663), but would use Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave or Church St as a connector to their destination within the District, there are approximately 6,281 people using the maintained streets for general benefit purposes. The persons engaging in general benefit activities represents 18.93% of the total estimated drivers (33,175), and is therefore considered to be District general benefit.

As previously mentioned, the local street special benefit has been estimated at 98.00% and, as such, the estimated minimum special benefit of Victoria Park Ln, Etiwanda Ave, Highland Ave and Church St should be reduced by 2.00% to account for that portion of traffic using local streets representing general benefit.

Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements on collector streets is estimated to be 20.93% and the special benefit is estimated to be 79.07%.

Collector Street General Benefit 20.93%
Arterial Streets: Milliken Ave, Base Line Rd, Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave Arterial streets are intended to provide a higher degree of mobility and generally serve longer vehicle trips. The arterial streets with landscape improvements serve not only residents in the immediate vicinity, but persons who live outside of the District and are passing by. The City’s Traffic Study (2009) does not identify the percentage of traffic on arterial streets, which is pass- through traffic.

Before we determine and allocate the percentage of special and general benefit for the arterial streets, we must first compute the estimated pass-through traffic. In lieu of having a study that identifies the pass-through traffic on the arterial streets, the estimated number of special benefit trips on the collector streets has been used since in order to enter or exit the District, a vehicle must travel on one of the arterial streets listed below. Per the City’s General Plan (2010), collector streets have an estimated 5,000 to 20,000 vehicles per day, for an average of 12,500.

Taking the 12,500 average daily trips for collector streets, 2,616 trips (20.93%) are for general benefit purposes, and 9,884 trips (79.07%), is deemed to be for special benefit purposes.

Estimated
Number of Trips
Collector Street Special Benefit – 79.07% 9,884
Collector Street General Benefit – 20.93%1 2,616
Total 12,500
(1) The 20.93% general benefit percentage already includes the 2.00% general benefit to account for the portion of traffic using for local streets.

The City’s Traffic Study (2009) does provide an estimated number of daily trips for specific areas within the District. When the City’s Traffic Study (2009) did not provide the estimated number of daily trips the average number was derived from the estimates provided in the City’s General Plan.

Page 320 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 36 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
Street Name
Average Number of
Vehicles per Day1
Milliken Ave 30,400
Base Line Rd 19,140
Day Creek Blvd 25,000
Rochester Ave 12,500
(1) Average Number of Vehicles per Day is from the City’s Traffic Study for Milliken Ave and Base Line Rd, (average based on City’s Traffic Study at points of street within the District), and from the City’s General Plan for Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave.

Based on the estimated number of 9,884 trips for special benefit purposes, we then reduce the average number of vehicles for each arterial street, to calculate our estimated pass-through trips. The pass-through trips are vehicles driving along the maintained streets within the District for a portion of their trips, but not residing in the District or benefiting from the landscaping improvements in place.

Street Name
Average Number
of Vehicles
per Day
Less:

Estimated Special
Benefit Trips
Estimated Number
of Pass
Through Trips
Estimated %
General
Benefit
Milliken Ave 30,400 9,884 20,516 67.49%
Base Line Rd 19,140 9,884 9,256 48.36%
Day Creek Blvd 25,000 9,884 15,116 60.47%
Rochester Ave 12,500 9,884 2,616 20.93%
Although Rochester Ave is listed as an arterial, the City’s General Plan (2010) Roadway Hierarchy includes this street as a Tertiary Travel Corridor, which categorizes the street as more locally oriented and locally travelled. In addition, the Roadway Hierarchy says that the typical number of vehicles per day is between 10,000 and 15,000 (average 12,500). Etiwanda Avenue and Church St are also included in the category, and as such, the general benefit trip percentage is close to the same as for the collector streets.

As previously mentioned, the estimated minimum special benefit of Milliken Ave, Base Line Rd, Day Creek Blvd and Rochester Ave have already been reduced by 2% to account for that portion of traffic using local streets representing general benefit.

Street Landscaping General Benefit Percentage
The general benefit percentages determined in the previous sections were then applied to each type of road in the District. The area in square feet of landscaping being maintained in the District was determined by the City’s Public Works Department. The general benefit percentage for each road and street type was multiplied by the total square footage being maintained for such street. The general benefit square footage was summed for all street segments and divided into the total square footage of all landscaping maintenance. The result is the overall general benefit percentage. The following table details this calculation.

Page 321 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 37 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
Street Name Street Type (1)
Total Square
Footage
General Benefit
Percentage
General Benefit
Square Footage
Milliken Ave Arterial 265,926 67.49% 179,473
Base Line Rd Arterial 367,018 48.36% 177,490
Day Creek Blvd Arterial 263,062 60.47% 159,074
Rochester Ave Arterial 175,573 20.93% 36,747
Church St Collector 181,344 20.93% 37,955
Etiwanda Ave Collector 10,358 20.93% 2,168
Highland Ave Collector 290,275 20.93% 60,755
Victoria Park Ln Collector 1,348,966 20.93% 282,339
Local/Minor Streets Local/Minor Streets 2,912,709 2.00% 58,254 Totals: 994,255
Street Landscaping General Benefit 17.10%
Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics, increased safety, and economic activity benefits resulting from the street landscaping improvements is estimated to be 17.10% and the special benefit is estimated to be 82.90%.

Neighborhood Parks
The six parks within the District were installed specifically for the residents of the District. Each of the parks is considered to be a neighborhood park, intended to serve those parcels within a one-half mile radius from the park. All parcels within the District are within a one-half mile from one of the six neighborhood parks, and most parcels outside of the District have their own neighborhood parks within close proximity. Even though the park facilities were installed for the benefit of the residents and those working within the District, there will be some general benefit to those people who do not live or conduct business inside the District.

There are 43.10 acres of park land within the District. According to the Trip Generation (2003) report, a City park generates an average of 1.59 trips per acre, with a range of rates between

1.04 – 8.00 (arithmetic mean is 4.52). Considering the mean rate per acre (4.52 trips), there are approximately 195 daily trips generated for parks within the District. According to the 2009 NHTS database, the average number of persons per vehicle is estimated to be 1.61 persons.

Therefore, based on the 195 daily park trips generated, 314 people are using the parks within the District.

There is a standard of one-half mile as a reasonable distance to walk to a park (California DOT, 1979). There are 6,957 households within the District, and an additional 1,834 households that are within a one-half mile and have direct access to the parks, but whose properties are not within the boundaries of the District.

Page 322 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 38 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
One-Half Mile
Park Population
Estimated
Number of
Residential Units Percentage
Within District Boundaries 6,957 79.14%
Outside District Boundaries 1,834 20.86%
Total Population 8,791 100.00%
To allocate the average of park trips generated and people using the parks within the District, we allocate the 314 estimated people using the parks daily by the percentages shown above.

Based on the one-half mile radius population, approximately 66 people may use the parks within the District, but living outside of the boundaries of the District.

One-Half Mile
Park Population
Estimated
Number of
People Using
Parks Daily
Within District Boundaries 248
Outside District Boundaries 66
Total Population 314
A factor that has been considered is that most of the people living within the one-half mile radius from the parks within the District also live within a closer distance to other parks that are not within the District, and will most likely use the parks that are closer in proximity to their property.

However, in calculating the general benefit usage we recognize that those people may still use the District parks.

Taking the 66 persons using the parks within the District, but residing outside of the District, divided by the total population residing outside of the District, but within one-half mile from the parks (1,834), the estimated percentage of persons engaging in general benefit park activities that do not reside within the District represents 3.60%.

One-Half Mile Boundary General Benefit 3.60%
Given the location and size of the parks, it is very unlikely the public at large would seek out or use these smaller, local parks. Especially, when the City has larger community and regional parks that are intended to attract people from outside areas, and provide recreational opportunities beyond those supplied by the neighborhood parks. However, various sports teams are allowed access to the parks for games even though according to the City, sports teams with members residing within the District are given first priority for use of the parks.

Nevertheless, it is likely that certain members of the public at large may use the smaller parks, and as such, we have assigned a 1.00% general benefit for the park improvements to the public at large.

Public at large General Benefit 1.00%

Page 323 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 39 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
Based on the above calculations, the general benefit portion of the improved aesthetics and economic activity benefits resulting from the park improvements is estimated to be 4.60% and the special benefit is estimated to be 95.40%.

Park General Benefit 4.60%
Collective General Benefit
Since the District is comprised of improved aesthetics, increased safety and economic activity benefits resulting from a blend of improvements (sidewalks, trails, street landscaping and parks), the activity of both pedestrians and vehicles must be addressed in a collective form rather than independently. Therefore, the arithmetic mean of the general benefit percentages has been used to quantify the overall level of general benefit for the District. This general benefit result is provided in the table below:

Sidewalk and Trail General Benefit 4.17%
Street Landscaping General Benefit 17.10%
Park General Benefit 4.60%
District General Benefit 8.62%
The general benefit, which is the percentage of the total budget that must be funded through sources other than assessments, is 8.62%. The special benefit then, which is the percentage of the budget that may be funded by assessments, is 91.38%.

METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
Overview
Pursuant to the 1972 Act, Article XIII D of the California Constitution, and the Proposition 218 Omnibus Implementation Act, all parcels that receive a special benefit conferred upon them as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services shall be identified, and the proportionate special benefit derived by each identified parcel shall be determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of improvements. Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code, the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, permits the establishment of assessment districts by local agencies for the purpose of providing certain public improvements which include the operation, maintenance and servicing of landscaping improvements.

Section 22573 of the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 requires that maintenance assessments must be levied according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. This Section states:

Page 324 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 40 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements."
The determination of whether or not a lot or parcel will benefit from the improvements shall be made pursuant to the Improvement Act of 1911 (Division 7 commencing with Section 5000) [of the Streets and Highways Code, State of California].

Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution limits the amount of any assessment to the proportional special benefit conferred on the property. Article XIII D also provides that publicly owned properties must be assessed unless there is clear and convincing evidence that those properties receive no special benefit from the assessment. Examples of parcels exempted from the assessment would be the areas of public streets, public avenues, public lanes, public roads, public drives, public courts, public alleys, public easements and right-of- ways, public greenbelts and public parkways. Furthermore, Proposition 218 requires the City to separate general benefits from special benefits, whereas only special benefits may be assessed.

As further detailed in the following sections, the Method of Assessment uses the following components to assign special benefit to each parcel:
Benefit Points: Assignment of points for aesthetic, safety and economic special benefits.
Benefit Factor: Multiplier. For residential parcels the benefit factor is units, and for non- residential parcels the benefit factor is lot size (acreage). Benefit Units: Sum of a parcel’s benefit points multiplied by the parcel’s benefit factor.

The total amount is the special benefit units assigned to a parcel.

Apportioning of Special Benefit
As previously outlined, each of the parcels within the District receives a special benefit from the improvements. Each parcel that has a special benefit conferred upon it as a result of the maintenance and operation of improvements and services provided is identified and the proportionate special benefits derived by each identified parcel is determined in relationship to the entire costs of the maintenance and operation of the improvements.

Page 325 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 41 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
The total costs of maintenance and operation, less the amount of general benefits identified, will be assessed to the parcels within the District based on the estimated benefit units assigned to each parcel. To assess special benefits appropriately, it is necessary to relate parcels of different land uses and development status to each other. The benefit unit method of apportionment uses the single-family home as the basic unit of assessment since there is a total of 5,890 single family parcels within the District which represents 90.96% of the total assessable parcels within the District. The following shows how each parcel’s benefit units have been determined.

Aesthetic Benefit Points
Aesthetic Benefit Points are assigned based upon the property’s proximity to the improvements as well as the property’s existing land use. All Single Family Residential parcels are located within the same proximity to the collective improvements (sidewalks, community trails, street landscaping and one-half mile from one of the parks). Each Single Family Residential parcel is fronted by sidewalk improvements, is within a one-half mile from one of the neighborhood parks, and uses the roads with street landscaping to enter and exit the District. In addition, the community trails are located throughout the District and serve as connectors between the different neighborhoods, school and shopping locations. All properties are within similar proximity to the trail improvements. Many trails are located along the sidewalks and streets, and all properties within the District have access to the trails through the various access points located throughout the entire District. The Single Family Residential parcels within the District are relatively similar in both building size and lot size. Since the improvements are provided uniformly throughout the District, Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 4.00 aesthetic benefit points, one for each of the improvement types.

Multi-Family and Condominium parcels are within close proximity to the sidewalks, and receive the benefit of having maintained sidewalks for users to travel and access the property. Although these parcels benefit from the aesthetics of the sidewalks they do not receive the same benefit as Single Family Residential parcels, since Multi-Family and Condominium parcels do not have continuous sidewalk improvements along the frontage of each parcel/unit. Multi-Family and Condominium parcels are within a one-half mile of the neighborhood parks, use the roads with street landscaping to enter and exit their housing complexes within the District, and are in close proximity to the trail improvements. Accounting for the lower average household size of Multi- Family and Condominium parcels, and not having continuous sidewalk improvements directly fronting their property/unit, these properties have a reduced level of benefit from the improvements. Multi-Family and Condominium parcels are assigned 2.80 benefit points.

Maintained sidewalks and street landscaping create an aesthetically pleasing environment for both employees and patrons of commercial properties. The overall aesthetics, interest and desirability of commercial properties within the District increase, as a result of the maintenance and servicing of the collective improvements. Based on the City’s Land Use Plan and residential designations of homes within the District, there is an average of six Single Family Residential properties per acre within the District (General Plan, 2010). However, given the nature of their property use type, Commercial properties do not receive the same level of benefit

Page 326 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 42 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
from the trail and park improvements in relationship to residential land uses. Commercial properties are assigned 16.00 benefit points.

A handful of parcels within the District are used to provide public services (such as fire stations, schools, churches and other similar uses) to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. These parcels benefit from the collective improvements in place, but at a reduced level compared to a Single Family Residential parcel, due to the nature of the improvements and their land use. In addition, these public service parcels are in place for the surrounding community, and the existence of well-maintained parks, street landscaping and community trails is not a significant factor in the decision to locate those facilities. Given the nature of their property use types, these public service parcels are assigned a 1.00 benefit points in recognition of the limited benefit they receive from the improvements maintained by the District.

Undeveloped parcels within the District receive an aesthetic benefit from the maintenance of the collective improvements, but given the very limited activity and pedestrian access that these properties provide, properties within this land use category receive a reduced level of benefit.

To account for this reduced benefit, all undeveloped properties are assigned 0.40 benefit points.

Common area, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics. Utility parcels are located based on their proximity to the parcels they serve, and based upon their property usage (wireless towers, flood control basins and fire trail/access roads) do not benefit from the increased aesthetics.

The following shows the aesthetic benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District:

Page 327 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 43 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
Safety Benefit Points
Safety Benefit Points are assigned based upon the property’s proximity to the improvements as well as the property’s existing land use. The Single Family Residential parcels within the District are relatively similar in both building size and lot size. Since the sidewalks, trails and street landscaping improvements are provided uniformly throughout the District, Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 3.00 safety benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Based on the additional pedestrian traffic that commercial property generates compared to residential property, and that there is an average of six Single Family Residential Properties per acre within the District, Commercial parcels are assigned 18.00 benefit points.

Multi-Family and Condominium parcels are within close proximity to the sidewalks, and receive the benefit of having maintained sidewalks, trails and street landscaping for users to travel and access the property. Multi-Family and Condominium parcels receive a reduced level of benefit from the safety of the sidewalks as they do not receive the same benefit as parcels that have continuous sidewalk improvements along the entire frontage of their parcel/unit. In addition, Multi-Family and Condominium parcels have a lower average household size, which results in a reduced volume of pedestrian traffic on the sidewalks and trails compared to a Single Family Residential parcel. Multi-Family and Condominium parcels are assigned 2.10 benefit points.

A handful of parcels within the District are used to provide public services (such as fire stations, schools, churches and other similar uses) to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. However, based on the nature and location of the sidewalk and street landscaping improvements and public access to these properties, these parcels receive a safety benefit from the maintenance of the improvements. These public service parcels are assigned 2.00 benefit points in recognition of the benefit they receive.

Well maintained green areas reduce the occurrence of crime and vandalism, and as such the maintenance of the improvements within the District create a safety benefit for the undeveloped parcels within the District. However, the safety benefit is reduced compared to a Single Family Residential parcels due to the very limited activity and pedestrian access that these properties provide. Undeveloped properties are assigned 0.30 benefit points.

Common area, roads and easements are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive benefit from the increased aesthetics. Utility parcels are located based on their proximity to the parcels they serve, and given the nature of the property usage ((wireless towers, flood control basins and fire trail/access roads) do not benefit from the increased safety.

The following shows the safety benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District:

Page 328 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 44 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
Parcel Land Use Category
Safety Benefit
Points
Single Family Residential 3.00
Condominium Residential 2.10
Multi-Family Residential 2.10
Commercial/Industrial 18.00
Public Service Parcels – Church/Fire Station/School 2.00 Undeveloped 0.30
Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00
Economic Benefit Points
Accounting for the existing economic activity throughout the District, as well as the potential for properties to develop, redevelop and invest in their economic presence, properties within the District are assigned benefit points for the economic activity benefits received from the uniform and maintained improvements. Economic activity benefit points are assigned based upon the property’s location to the District activities, as well as the property’s existing land use. The District’s improvements will allow properties to maximize their development, land use and occupancy rates. Residential land uses are assigned benefit points in proportion to the number of trips generated and average number of occupants per dwelling unit in comparison to the typical single-family parcel. Single Family Residential parcels are assigned 4.00 benefit points, one for each of the improvement types. Studies have consistently shown that the average multi-family residential unit impacts infrastructure approximately 80% as much as a single-family residence. Condominium parcels are assigned 3.20 benefit points since the number of trips generated per condominium unit is approximately 80% of the typical single-family residential units (Trip Generation, 2003). Multi-family residential parcels are assigned 2.40 benefit points per dwelling unit since the number of trips generated per multi-family residential unit, per the City’s Traffic Study (2009), are 60% of the typical single-family residential unit.

To recognize the increase in economic activity and additional pedestrian traffic that non- residential properties generate compared to residential property, non-residential Commercial properties are assigned benefit points based on the average trip generations of non-residential property compared to a Single Family Residential property. Based on the City’s Traffic Study (2009), and given that the non-residential parcels within the District are of mixed uses, the trip generation rate for non-residential parcels averages just under 320 trips per acre, which is approximately 5.6 times per acre that of a single family residential development. The trip generation rate is reduced to account for pass-through trips which are estimated to be 20%.

Therefore, the economic benefit points assigned Commercial parcels is 4.50 per one residential benefit point. Commercial properties are assigned a total of 18.00 economic benefit points.

The public services parcels and utility parcels within the District are used to provide services to the surrounding community, and are located based upon their proximity to the parcels they serve. These parcels receive no economic benefit from the collective improvements in place.

Therefore, they are not assigned benefit points for economic activities.

Page 329 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 45 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
The availability of well-maintained sidewalk, landscaping and park improvements within the local community enhances the ability of owners of undeveloped parcels of land to develop those parcels, as studies have shown that there is an increase in demand for residents and businesses to locate within communities with well-maintained sidewalk, landscaping and park improvements. However, since undeveloped parcels generate fewer trips and given the limited activity these properties provide, they receive a reduced economic benefit from the maintenance of the collective improvements. To account for this reduced benefit, but still recognize development potential, all undeveloped properties are assigned 1.50 benefit points.

Common areas and roads are deemed to receive no benefit from the District maintenance activities because they serve as connectors for other properties and do not receive an economic benefit.

The following shows the economic benefit points assigned to the parcel land use categories within the District:

Parcel Land Use Category
Economic Benefit
Points
Single Family Residential 4.00
Condominium Residential 3.20
Multi-Family Residential 2.80
Commercial/Industrial 18.00
Public Service Parcels – Church/Fire Station/School 0.00 Undeveloped 1.50
Common Area/Roads/Utility 0.00
Total Special Benefit Points Calculation
The formula below shows the total special benefit points calculation for each parcel within the District:

Parcel’s Total
Special Benefit
Points
=
Parcel’s
Aesthetic
Benefit Points
+
Parcel’s
Safety
Benefit Points
+
Parcel’s
Economic
Benefit Points
Parcel Factors
The method of apportioning the benefit to the parcels within the District reflects the proportional special benefit assigned to each property within the District based upon various property characteristics of parcels as compared to other properties within the District. By adjusting the assigned special benefit points set forth above by parcel factors, a more complete picture of the proportional special benefits received by each parcel within the District is presented. Given that the special benefits provided by the District focus on aesthetic benefit, safety benefit, and economic activity benefits, it was determined that lot size (acreage) for non-residential parcels and units for residential parcels were the most appropriate parcel factors. The number of units for non-residential parcels would not accurately reflect the amount of development and

Page 330 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 46 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
redevelopment that may occur. In addition, a larger parcel allows for a greater area to develop and redevelop than smaller parcels, which corresponds to larger parcels receiving proportionately greater aesthetic, safety and economic activity benefits when compared to smaller parcels within the District. Therefore, the benefits assigned for each parcel in the District is in direct proportion to the size of the parcel and potential development of the parcel.

Residential parcels are limited by the number of units on the parcel more than the actual lot size. However, the greater the lot size, the more units can be placed on a parcel, and the more persons who use and benefits from the collective improvements. Therefore, the benefits assigned for each parcel in the District is in direct proportion to the units assigned to that parcel.

The formula below shows the parcel factor calculation for each parcel within the District:

Residential Parcel Factor = Units
Non-Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage
Total Benefit Units per Parcel Calculation
To appropriately quantify and assign the total benefit units for each parcel within the District, the total special benefit points are further adjusted according to the formula below:

Parcel’s Total
Benefit Units =
Parcel’s Total
Special Benefit
Points
X Parcel
Factor
Total Special Benefit Units
The total special benefit units for the District at this time are 81,554.33 Data Considerations and Parcel Changes
The use of the latest Assessor’s Secured Roll information has been and shall be used in the future as the basis in determining each parcel’s land use category, units and lot size (acreage), unless better data was or is available to the City. In addition, if any parcel within the District is identified by the Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number, the land use category, units and lot size (acreage) of the subsequent valid parcels shall serve as the basis in assigning parcel factor special benefit units. If a single parcel changes to multiple parcels, the special benefit units shall be recalculated based on the property type, number of units and acreage data for the new parcels, rather than each new parcel receiving a proportionate share of the original assessment.

Special Considerations: Publicly Owned Parcels
Any publicly owned parcels that benefit from the improvements cannot be exempt from the assessment. The special benefits accruing to these types of parcels must be determined using the same kind of formulas and benefit point assignment as applied to privately owned parcels.

This requirement is clearly conveyed in Article XIII D, Section 4(a) of the California Constitution which states in part, “... Parcels within a district that are owned or used by any agency, the State of California or the United States shall not be exempt from assessment unless the agency can

Page 331 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 47 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that those publicly owned parcels in fact receive no special benefit.” Publicly owned parcels are categorized and assigned benefit units using the same methodology as privately owned parcels, based on their land use as shown on the latest County Secured Roll.

Rate per Benefit Unit
The assessment rate per special benefit unit is calculated by dividing the total cost estimate to be assessed by the total special benefit units assigned to the parcels in the District. The following formula provides the assessment rate per special benefit unit calculation:

Rate per
Benefit Unit = Total Costs to
be Assessed / District’s Total
Benefit Units
Method of Assessment Spread
The method of assessment is based upon a formula that assigns the special benefits to each parcel, with special benefit points being adjusted by the parcel’s number of units or lot size (acreage). The formula below provides a summary of the annual assessment calculation for each parcel in the District.
(A)
Parcel’s Total
Benefit Units
=
(B)
Parcel’s Total
Special Benefit
Points
X
(C)
Parcel
Factor
(B)
Parcel’s Total
Special Benefit
Points
=
Parcel’s
Aesthetic
Benefit Points
+
Parcel’s
Safety
Benefit Points
+
Parcel’s
Economic
Benefit Points
Residential Parcel Factor = Units(C)
Parcel Factor Non-Residential Parcel Factor = Acreage
Applying the Method of Assessment Spread
The maximum assessment for each parcel in the District is calculated by the following procedure:

Step 1:Assign each parcel its appropriate land use category based on the most recent San Bernardino County Assessor’s Secured Roll data.

Page 332 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 48 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
Step 2:Determine each parcel’s appropriate aesthetic benefit points based on land use. The aesthetic benefit points are shown in the following table:

Parcel Land Use Category
Aesthetic
Benefit Points
Single Family Residential 4.00
Condominium Residential 2.80
Multi-Family Residential 2.80
Commercial/Industrial 16.00
Public Service Parcels – Church/Fire Station/School 1.00 Undeveloped 0.40
Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00
Step 3:Determine each parcel’s appropriate safety benefit points based on land use. The safety benefit points are shown in the following table:

Parcel Land Use Category
Safety Benefit
Points
Single Family Residential 3.00
Condominium Residential 2.10
Multi-Family Residential 2.10
Commercial/Industrial 18.00
Public Service Parcels – Church/Fire Station/School 2.00 Undeveloped 0.30
Common Area/Roads/Easements/Utility 0.00
Step 4:Determine each parcel’s appropriate economic benefit points based on land use.

The economic benefit points are shown in the following table:

Page 333 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 49 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
Step 5: Sum the aesthetic benefit points, safety benefit points and economic benefit points for each parcel. The total benefit points are shown in the following table:

Parcel Land Use Category
Aesthetic
Benefit
Points
Safety
Benefit
Points
Economic
Benefit
Points
Total
Benefit
Points
Single Family Residential 4.00 3.00 4.00 11.00
Condominium Residential 2.80 2.10 3.20 8.10
Multi-Family Residential 2.80 2.10 2.80 7.70
Commercial/Industrial 16.00 18.00 18.00 52.00
Public Service Parcels –
Church/ Fire Station/ School 1.00 2.00 0.00 3.00
Undeveloped 0.40 0.30 1.50 2.20
Common Area/ Roads/
Easements/ Utility 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Step 6:Determine the appropriate parcel factor based on the parcel’s land use. The unit of measurement for each parcel factor, by land use, is shown in the following table:

Residential Parcel Factor = Units
Non-Residential Parcel
Factor = Acreage
Step 7:Multiply the total benefit points by parcel factor to compute each parcel’s total special benefit units.

Step 8: Sum the result of Step 7 for all parcels in the District.

Step 9: Separate the general benefit from the special benefit, and divide the portion of the budget representing special benefit by the result of Step 8 to compute the rate per benefit unit.

Step 10: Multiply each parcel’s total benefit units by the result of Step 9 to compute each parcel’s assessment.

Step 11:In future years the rate per benefit unit may be adjusted by inflation.

Page 334 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 50 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2
Proposed Maximum Assessment Rates
The Fiscal Year 2022/23 maximum allowable assessment rate is calculated by dividing the net total to be assessed by the total special benefit units assigned to parcels in the District based on property type, unit and acreage data. For Fiscal Year 2022/23, the calculation is as follows:

Maximum Assessment
per Benefit Unit = Special Benefit
to be Assessed / District’s Total
Benefit Units
$51.18 = $ 4,172,359.78 / 81,554.33
Parcel Land Use Category
Total Benefit
Points Parcel Factor
Maximum Allowable
Assessment for
2022/23
Single Family Residential 11.00 Parcel 562.85$
Condominium Residential 8.10 Unit 414.21
Multi-Family Residential 7.70 Unit 393.50
Commercial/Industrial 52.00 Acre 2,660.74
Public Service Parcels - Church/ Fire
Station/ School 3.00 Acre 153.50
Undeveloped 2.20 Acre 112.08
Common Area/ Roads / Easements/
Utility 0.00 Parcel 0.00
Cost of Living Inflator
Each fiscal year, beginning Fiscal Year 2014/15, the maximum allowable assessment amount may be increased by the lesser of 3% or the percentage change in the year ending February preceding the start of the Fiscal Year of the Consumer Price Index for all Urban Consumers (CPI-U), for the Riverside – San Bernardino – Ontario Consumer Price Index area. If for any reason the percentage change is negative, the maximum allowable assessment would not be decreased by reason of such negative percentage change and would remain at the amount as computed on the previous fiscal year regardless of any CPI-U adjustment. If operating costs are such that the maximum assessment amount is not needed, the City would levy only what is needed for that fiscal year.

The actual assessment rate for Fiscal Year 2022/23 will increase from $503.80 to $518.88 per single-family residence, a CPI increase of 3.0% as compared to Fiscal Year 2021/22.

Page 335 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 51 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2

Page 336 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 52 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2

Page 337 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 2 – City of Rancho Cucamonga 53 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 2

Property Type (County Use Code)
Actual
Assessment
Rate Per EBU
Total Units/
Acres Total EBUs Total Assessment
Single Family Residential 47.18$ 5,890.00 64,790.00 $ 3,056,792.20 Condominium Residential 47.18 972.00 7,873.20 371,457.58 Multi-Family Residential 47.18 729.00 5,613.30 264,835.49 Commercial/ Industrial 47.18 57.97 3,014.44 142,221.28 Public Service Parcels – Church/Fire Station/ School 47.18 75.28 226.06 10,665.51 Undeveloped 47.18 16.97 37.33 1,761.23 Total 7,741.22 81,554.33 $ 3,847,733.29
A copy of the full assessment roll is available for review in the City Clerk's office.

Annexations
There were no effective annexations for Fiscal Year 2022/23.

Page 338 ends

ATTACHMENT 3
Preliminary Annual Engineer’s Report
Fiscal Year 2022/23
City of Rancho Cucamonga
Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B
(Commercial Industrial)

Page 339 ends

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 3B
(COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL)
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
Phone: 909.477.2700
Fax: 909.477.2845

CITY COUNCIL
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
Lynne B. Kennedy, Mayor Pro Tem
Ryan A. Hutchison, Council Member
Kristine D. Scott, Council Member

Page 340 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ENGINEER’S LETTER 1
INTRODUCTION 3
Reason for Assessment 3
Process for Annual Assessment 3
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS 4
Description of the Boundaries of the District 4
Description of Improvements and Services 4
Map of Improvements 8
ESTIMATE OF COSTS 10
District Budget 10
Definitions of Budget Items 12
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT 13
Overview 13
General Benefit 14
Special Benefit 14
Method of Assessment Spread 15
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM 16
ASSESSMENT ROLL AND ANNEXATIONS 18
Assessment Roll 18
Annexations 18

Page 341 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B – City of Rancho Cucamonga 1 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 3
ENGINEER’S LETTER
WHEREAS, on June 15, 2022, the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga (the “City”), under the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (the “1972 Act”) adopted its Resolution No. 2022-xxx, a Resolution Initiating Proceedings for the Levy of Annual Assessments for Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B (Commercial Industrial) (the “District”); and WHEREAS, the Resolution Initiating Proceedings directed staff to prepare and file an Annual Engineer’s Report for Fiscal Year 2022/23 pursuant to the requirements of the 1972 Act.

Fiscal Year
2022/23 Budget
Expenditures
Personnel Services 149,150$
Operations and Maintenance 899,310
Capital Project 105,000
Total Expenditures Budget 1,153,460
Revenues
Taxes:

Estimated Assessments, Net of Estimated Delinquencies 825,220 Anticipated Prior Year Delinquencies Collection 9,610
Subtotal - Taxes 834,830
Other Revenues 82,630
Total Revenues Budget 917,460
Contribution to/(Use of) Fund Balance (236,000)$
Total District EBU Count 2,923.80
Actual Assessment per EBU 282.24$
Maximum Allowable Assessment per EBU 352.80$

Page 342 ends

____________________________________________________________________________ Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B – City of Rancho Cucamonga 2 Fiscal Year 2022/23 ATTACHMENT 3
In making the assessments contained herein pursuant to the 1972 Act:

I, the undersigned, respectfully submit the enclosed Annual Engineer’s Report and, to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, I certify that the Annual Engineer’s Report and Assessment Diagram included herein have been prepared and computed in accordance with the order of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Assessment Law. ___________________________________________________________ Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer

Page 343 ends

Rancho Cucamonga City CouncilJune 15, 2022

Rancho Cucamonga City Council
June 15, 2022