Agenda packet — Rancho Cucamonga City Council, September 4, 2024 (part 1 of 4)

CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”

Page 1 ends

Mayor
L. Dennis Michael

Mayor Pro Tem
Lynne B. Kennedy

Members of the City
Council:

Ryan A. Hutchison
Kristine D. Scott
Ashley Stickler

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
September 4, 2024
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY- SUCCESSOR AGENCY –

PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY

CLOSED SESSION

REGULAR MEETINGS

TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.

The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It is the intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas or by contacting the City Clerk Services Department at 909-774-2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3). For City Council Rules of Decorum refer to Resolution No. 2023-086.

Any documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available in the City Clerk Services Department during normal business hours at City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City’s website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas.

CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.

TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM

ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler

A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS

Page 2 ends

D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION

D1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9, NAME OF CASE: LUIS CETINA V. STEPHANIE SHEA, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY REGISTRAR OF VOTERS; JANICE REYNOLDS, RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY CLERK, SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO. CIVRS 2400698. (CITY)

D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8

FOR A UTILITY EASEMENT GENERALLY LOCATED WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY OF ROCHESTER AVENUE BETWEEN 8TH STREET AND JERSEY BOULEVARD, JERSEY BOULEVARD

BETWEEN ROCHESTER AVENUE AND WHITE OAK AVENUE, AND WHITE OAK AVENUE SOUTH OF JERSEY BOULEVARD; NEGOTIATING PARTIES: JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA; SARAH WATERSON, PRESIDENT, REPRESENTING DESERTXPRESS ENTERPRISES, LLC, DBA BRIGHTLINE WEST; AND JENNIFER FARLEY, SENIOR SPECIALIST, REAL ESTATE AND FACILITIES, REPRESENTING SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON; UNDER NEGOTIATION:

PRICE AND TERMS OF PAYMENT. (CITY)

D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. DR LANDMARK, INC.; POWER MEDIC TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; HOFER PROPERTIES, LLC; AND DOES 1 THROUGH 5 INCLUSIVE, SBSC CASE NO. CIVDS 1904713. (CITY)

E. RECESS

Page 3 ends

REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.

COUNCIL CHAMBERS

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler

A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA

B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS

C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits us from addressing any issue not on the Agenda. Testimony may be received and referred to staff or scheduled for a future meeting.

Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes per individual. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, disorderly or boisterous conduct that disturbs, disrupts, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the meeting. For more information, refer to the City Council Rules of Decorum and Order (Resolution No. 2023-086) located in the back of the Council Chambers.

The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.

Page 4 ends

CONSENT CALENDARS:

The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.

Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar.

D. CONSENT CALENDAR

D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes for Regular Meetings of August 21, 2024.

D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,435,416.10 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (No Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $13,205,840.86 Dated August 12, 2024, Through August 25, 2024. (CITY/FIRE)

D3. Consideration to Approve a Single-Source Procurement and Execute a Contract with ASSI Security for the Purchase of Equipment and Phase II of the Security Access Control System Upgrade Project at Various City and Fire District Facilities in an Amount Not to Exceed $466,294 and Appropriate $62,100 from the Fire Protection Capital Fund Balance. (CITY/FIRE)

D4. Consideration to Approve a Single-Source Procurement of Traffic Signal Cabinets, Controllers, and Related Equipment from Econolite Control Products of Anaheim, California, in an Amount Not to Exceed $330,830 for Fiscal Year 2024/25. (CITY)

D5. Consideration to Approve an Agreement for Backup Cloud Services from Amazon Web Services, Inc. Not to Exceed the Amount of $137,000. (CITY)

D6. Consideration to Approve an Amendment to a Special Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Law Corporation. (CITY)

D7. Consideration to Determine the Almond Street Extension Project is Categorically Exempt Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15168 – Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Section 15301 – Existing Facilities, and Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. (CITY)

D8. Consideration of a Resolution Waiving the Collection of Certain Inspection, Permit, and Special Services Fees for Fiscal Year 2024-25. (RESOLUTION NO. FD 2024-023) (FIRE)

D9. Consideration to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Related to Case No.

DRC2023-00055 (Project), Located at 7153 Amethyst Avenue. This Project Has Been Determined by Staff to Be Exempt from the California Environment Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 and 15305, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures and Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations. (RESOLUTION NO. 2024-091) (CITY)

D10. Consideration to Receive and File the Summary of the Public Safety Response to 2023 Holiday Lights Display and Consideration of a Resolution Temporarily Closing Portions of Thoroughbred and Jennet Streets, West of Sapphire Street and East of Turquoise Avenue, and a Portion of Turquoise Avenue Between Jennet and Thoroughbred Streets, to Pedestrian Traffic During the Area’s 2024 Holiday Light Display. (RESOLUTION NO. 2024-090) (CITY)

Page 5 ends

E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION

F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)

G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT

G1. Public Hearing to Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program Year 2023-2024 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). (CITY)

G2. Public Hearing to Approve the Draft Substantial Amendment to the 2020-2021, 2022-2023, and 2024-2025 Annual Action Plans for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. (CITY)

G3. Public Hearing to Approve the Draft Amendment to the Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) for the Community Development Block (CDBG) Program. (CITY)

H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)

I. COUNCIL BUSINESS

I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS

(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)

I2. INTERAGENCY UPDATES

(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)

J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS

K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING

L. ADJOURNMENT - Adjourn to Tuesday, September 17, 2024, at 7:00 p.m.

CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.

LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC

CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR

If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk Services Department (909) 774-2023. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,

PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES

The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a Closed Session on Wednesday, August 21, 2024, in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM.

Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.

Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager/Economic and Community Development and Julie Sowles, Deputy City Manager/Civic and Cultural Services.

A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS

D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION

D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS JENIFER PHILLIPS, DIRECTOR OF

HUMAN RESOURCES, MATT BURRIS, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ECONOMIC AND

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND JULIE SOWLES, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/CIVIC AND CULTURAL SERVICES; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA CITY EMPLOYEES’ ASSOCIATION (RCCEA). (CITY)

D2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL – EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA V. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, SBSC CASE NO. CIVSB2201969. (CITY)

D3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12467 BASE LINE ROAD IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBERS 1090-331-03-0000, 1090 -331-04-0000, 1089 -581-04-0000;

NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND ROBERT DIAZ, NATIONAL CORE; REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY)

D4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS PEPPERWOOD APARTMENTS ADDRESS, 9055 FOOTHILL BOULEVARD; NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA;

AND IAN SIMPSON, DIRECTOR OF R EAL ESTATE PORTFOLIO, AND CAPITAL MARKETS, LINC HOUSING CORPORATION REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY)

E. RECESS

The closed session recessed at 5:56 p.m.

Page 6 ends

The Regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on August 21, 2024, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.

Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.

Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; and Patricia Bravo-Valdez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services.

Council Member Stickler led the Pledge of Allegiance
A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA

None.

B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS

B1. Presentation in Recognition of the Rancho Cucamonga Building & Safety Department for Receiving Accredited Status by the International Accreditation Service (IAS), Certifying Best Practices for Public Safety, Customer Service, Plan Check, Permitting, and Inspections Processes.

Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council recognized Zach Neighbors, Director of Building & Safety, and staff mem bers from the Building & Safety Department for receiving accredited status by the International Accreditation Services (IAS), certifying best practices for public safety, customer service, plan check, permitting, and inspections processes.

B2. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to Bystanders who Performed Lifesaving CPR and Recognition of the Fire Protection District Receiving the 2024 Mission: Lifeline EMS Gold Medal Achievement.

Sandy Griffin, Josh Stapleton and Patty Eickholt from the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Division, provided a Power Point presentation about the 2024 Lifeline EMS Gold Medal Achievement. Residents were encouraged to download the PulsePoint app designed to alert bystanders of active CPR incidents.

Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council recognized and presented Certificates of Recognition to Mr. Kevin Mandy and Mr. Rolando Arce, for their lifesaving efforts during a CPR incident that saved Mr.

Steele’s life.

Page 7 ends

Husam Suleiman, spoke about crimes in Israel, requested the City divest from companies who are complicit with international crimes, requested a meeting with the City Council and suggested the City Council offer quarterly meetings for residents to have dialogue with Council Members, similar to the City of Redlands “Coffee with the Council” program.

Anwar Abdul-Rahman shared his candidacy for the Etiwanda School District (ESD) Board Trustee Area 5.

Jeff Branson spoke about constitutional rights violations within the City , recent contact attempts with City officials and the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department. He requested the City uphold U.S. Constitutional Rights.

Deborah Keedy expressed her concern about the enforcement of political signs within the City and displayed images of a property with an illuminated political election sign, erected over 150 days before the election, violating a City ordinance. She requested the City enforce code ordinances.

Aaron Keedy, spoke about the Cucamonga Creek Trail, displayed images of the trail and requested modifications to the City’s Cucamonga Canyon Management Plan.

Judith Brennan, Larry Greer, Martin Yapur and Sergio Valdez spoke in regard to item H1, they expressed concerns of public safety , potential neighborhood nuisances by increasing access , low visibility of pedestrians caused by evening sports practice/games/tournaments , the disconnect in applying 2024 housing standards to a 1970’s housing track, decreasing property value if access is opened at cul -de-sac and requested the City Council vote to leave the fence restricting general public access from Arabian Drive.

Phillip E. Walker spoke about the continued success of a film named Sweetest Vacation, the recent success of a short film named Hapless Revenge and announced upcoming premiers and nominations for the films.

Stephen Janis spoke about item D3 listed under Closed Session items of discussion, a prior RFP process that was proposed to the City Council three years ago and requested a winery project be considered to preserve the history of the site and not a high-density housing project.

City Attorney Ghirelli shared that although the Closed Session discussion on item D3 is confidential, the City Council authorized him to disclose that the discussion did not relate to residential development, the sale of the property or any of the proposals in the prior RF P. It was solely related to the price and terms of payment for a modification of the lease as a winery use.

Sandra Torrez shared fire hazard concerns about a vacant lot located on 24th Street and Center Avenue and requested the City properly clean it and add a fence around the lot.

City Manager Gillison informed Ms. Torrez that the lot is subject of active litigation and has a prior pending entitlement. He noted the City Attorney is working with the City and the property owner through the judicial process to try to resolve the litigation and resume the entitlement process. Mr. Gillison thanked Ms. Torrez for expressing her concerns and assured that the City is working to resolve the issue.

Page 8 ends

Council Member Scott announced that she will need to abstain on item D3, due to a potential conflict of interest as her employer is Southern California Gas Company.

D1. Consideration of Meeting Minutes for Regular Meetings of July 17, 2024.

D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $4,781,783.96 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $11,854,090.26 Dated July 08, 2024, Through August 11, 2024, and City and Fire District Electronic Debit Registers for the Month of June in the Total Amount of $1,494,303.25. (CITY/FIRE)

D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $13,756.86 Dated July 08, 2024, Through August 11, 2024. (CITY/FIRE)

D4. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of June 30, 2024, and July 31, 2024, for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)

D5. Consideration to Accept Grant Revenue in the Amount of $1,652,064.38 Awarded by the California Governor's Office of Volunteers (CalVol) for FY24 -25; and Authorization to Appropriate $1,652,064.38 for the Approved Fostering a Climate Ready Workforce Program. (CITY)

D6. Consideration of a Reappropriation in the Amount of $20,000.00 from the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Funds Fiscal Year 2021 to be Available in Fiscal Year 24/25 to Purchase the Remaining Equipment as Originally Allocated. (CITY)

D7. Consideration of the Cooperative Purchase of One (1) 2024 CASE Construction Model Number SR270B T4 Skid Steer and Trailer via the Sourcewell Contract Number 011723 - CNH from Sonsray Machinery in the Amount of $159,103.56. (CITY)

D8. Consideration to Approve the Use of a Cooperative Agreement with OMNIA Partners for the Purchase of Computers and Equipment from Dell and Lenovo in the Amount of $245,000. (CITY/FIRE)

D9. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with On Duty Health, PLLC for Health and Fitness Assessments in the Amount of $222,210 Annually. (FIRE)

D10. Consideration to Approve Contract Number FD 2024-007 with Working Dogs for Warriors in the Amount of $12,000 Annually. (FIRE)

D11. Consideration of a Contract with Monet Construction, Inc. in the Amount of $5,957,320.37, plus a 10% Contingency, for the Construction of the Victoria Gardens Civic Plaza and Authorizing an Appropriation of $2,571,753. (CITY)

D12. Consideration of Amendment No. 001 to the Professional Services Agreement with Mary McGrath Architects for Conceptual Design Services in the Amount of $139,519 and Authorization to Appropriate $128,520. (FIRE)

Page 9 ends

*DRAFT*
August 21, 2024 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 9
D13. Consideration of Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract 23 -118 with BPR Consulting Group, Contract 23-121 with Interwest Consulting Group, and Contract 23 -119 with Willdan for Plan Checks and Inspection Services and to Approve Additional Appropriations in the Amount of $73,000. (CITY)

D14. Consideration of Amendment No. 06 to the Agreement with International Line Builders, Inc. (CO19-086) in the Amount of $1,198,800, Plus a 10% Contingency and an Appropriation of Funds in the Amount of $1,231,180 from the Fiber Optic Network (Fund 711) and $87,500 from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) for the Arrow Route Distribution Line Extension Project. (CITY)

D15. Consideration of Amendment No. 12 to the Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. (CO19-085) in the Amount of $43,200, Plus a 10% Contingency and Appropriation of Funds in the Amount of $47,520 from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) for the Bridgepoint Building 1 Cabling Project. (CITY)

D16. Consideration of Amendment No. 13 to the Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. (CO19-085) in the Amount of $1,550,340, Plus a 10% Contingency and Appropriation of Funds in the Amount of $1,705,380 from the Municipal Utility Fund (Fund 705) for the RCMU Cable and Conduit from the Arbors Substation to Sixth Street. (CITY)

D17. Consideration of a One (1) Year Professional Services Agreement with Clair Global Integration DBA Sound Image with the Option to Renew in One -Year Increments for up to Two (2) Additional Years for a Total Not-to-Exceed Amount of $281,630 plus a 10% Contingency in the Amount of $28,163 for Proactive Inspections and Maintenance of the City’s Audio-Visual Systems. (CITY)

D18. Consideration of a Contract with Gentry Brother’s, Inc. in the Amount of $2,249,865 Plus 10% Contingency for Fiscal Year 2024/25 Major Arterials Pavement Rehabilitation Project (Project) for Base Line Road and Hermosa Avenue. This Project is Exempt From the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Gov ernment Code Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. (CITY)

D19. Consideration to Approve a Final Map for Tract No. 20680, Located on the North Side of Base Line Road and West of Milliken Avenue at 11200 Base Line Road Commonly Known as Central Park, Related to Case No. SUBTT20680. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Certified an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on April 7, 2021 for the Central Park Master Plan. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, No Subsequent or Supplemental EIR is Required in Connection With Subsequent Discretionary Approvals of the Same Project. (CITY)

D20. Consideration to Approve Parcel Map No. 20034 Submitted by Flatiron Development Group Located at 6140 Haven Avenue on the Southwest Corner of Haven Avenue and Banyan Street. (CITY)

D21. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements Located on the Southwest Corner of 6th Street and Hyssop Drive per Improvement Agreement, Related to DRC2020 -00026, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize the Release of Bonds. (CITY)

D22. Consideration to Accept the Concrete Rehabilitation Project FY 23 -24 as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize Release of Retention and Bonds. (CITY)

Page 10 ends

D23. Consideration of Resolution No. 2024 -081, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Rescinding Resolution of Necessity No. 2022 -112, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Declaring Certain Real Property Interests Necessary for Public Purposes and Authorizing the Acquisition Thereof in Connection with the Etiwanda Grade Separation Project (Permanent Easement and Two (2) Temporary Construction Easements Over a Portion of APN 0229 - 291-23). (RESOLUTION NO. 2024-081) (CITY)

D24. Consideration to Order the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 1 Related to Case No. DRC2023-00121, Located at 8637 Vicara Drive (Project). This Project Has Been Determined by Staff to Be Exempt From the California Environment Quality Act (CEQ A) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. (RESOLUTION NO. 2024-088) (CITY)

D25. Consideration to Approve an Improvement Agreement, an Improvement Securities for Public Improvements, and a Resolution Ordering the Annexation to Landscape Maintenance District No. 3B Submitted by FL Transportation, Inc., Related to Case No. DRC2020-00222, Located on Southwest Corner of Hellman Avenue and 8th Street (Project). The Project Has Been Determined by Staff to Be Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15311 - Accessory Structures. (RESOLUTION NO. 2024-087) (CITY)

D26. Consideration of a Resolution Adopting the Measure I Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan Covering Fiscal Years 2024-2029. (RESOLUTION NO. 2024-089) (CITY)

D27. Consideration to Approve a Resolution Adopting a Side Letter Agreement Between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Executive Management Group and Salary Schedule for Executive Management Group Job Classifications Employed by the City of Rancho Cucamonga for Fiscal Year 2024-25. (RESOLUTION NO. 2024-086) (CITY)

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Stickler, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to approve the Consent Calendar Agenda items D1 through D27, with Council Member/Board Member Scott abstaining on item D3. Motion carried 5-0.

E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION

None.

Page 11 ends

F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)

F1. Discussion and Formation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Parking Authority Including (1) a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California Declaring the Need for a Parking Authority to Function in the City; (2) Declaring the City Council to be the Board of Directors of the Parking Authority; (3) a Resolution of the Board of Directors of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Parking Authority Approving Bylaws of the Parking Authority; (4) Draft Bylaws of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Parking Authority. (CITY RESOLUTION NO. 2024-085 AND PARKING AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. RCPA 2024-001) (CITY/RCPA) City Manager Gillison introduced Carrie Rios, Community Improvement Manager, and Veronica Fincher, Animal Services Director, who gave the staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item F1.

Mayor Michael opened the Administrative Hearing.

There were no public communications.

Mayor Michael closed the Administrative Hearing.

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Stickler, seconded by Council Member Scott, to adopt City Resolution No. 2024-085 and Parking Authority Resolution No. RCPA 2024-001. Motion carried 5-0.

G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT

G1. PUBLIC HEARING – MASTER PLAN, DESIGN REVIEW AND MINOR EXCEPTION – WESTERN SPIRE – A Request for a Site Plan and Design Review of a Mixed -Use Development on 1.8 Acres of Land Consisting of 176 Residential Units (Including 2 Live - Work Units), 7,870 Square Feet of Commercial Lease Area, and 1,400 Square Feet of Live - Work Commercial Lease Area with a Related Master Plan to Reduce the Required Non - Residential Floor Area Ratio and a Minor Exception for a Reduction in the Required On -Site Parking at the Northwest Corner of Red Oak Street and Spruce Avenue in the Center 2 (CE2) Zone. APN: 0208-353- 18 (Design Review DRC2023-00154, Master Plan DRC2023-00346) and Minor Exception DRC2023-00280. The Project Qualifies as a Class 32 Exemption Under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15332 – Infill Development Projects. (RESOLUTION NOS. 2024-082, 2024-083 AND 2024-084) (CITY)

City Manager Gillison introduced Tabe Van Der Zwaag, Associate Planner, who gave the staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item G1. Associate Planner Van Der Zwaag informed that one (1) letter in support was received from David Parker, Chase Partners, LTD, one (1) letter in opposition to the Class 32 Exemption by Kylah Staley, Attorney, Lozeau Drury, LLP and one (1) response letter from the City’s CEQA consultant, Jorge Estrada, Placeworks. Copies of the correspondence received were provided to the City Council and were available for the public to review on the City’s website.

Mayor Michael opened the Public Hearing.

Kylah Staley, Attorney, Lozeau Drury, LLP, spoke in opposition to item G1 and stated the Spruce & Red Oak Mixed-Use Apartments project does not qualify for the Class 32 Infill Exemption and requested an environmental impact report be prepared or mitigated negative declaration to ensure compliance with CEQA.

Applicant Gerald Hammer, Managing Partner, Rancho Red Oak, LLC, thanked the City and outlined how the project aligns with the City’s General Plan, spoke about the projects Parking Management Plan, noted that city staff hired a professional CEQA consultant and the project does qualify for the Class 32 Infill Exemption, and clarified that the elements of the building are not part of a CEQA review.

Page 12 ends

Council discussion ensued on the project aligning with the City’s General Plan, creating a walkable community, Parking Management Plan concerns and compliance, density and size of the project, State mandates, local control, project amenities, and the strategic location of the project for pedestrian and vehicle traffic flow.

City Attorney Ghirelli addressed CEQA comments and informed that the State of California is encouraging local jurisdictions to rely on the infill exemption for residential housing projects . This project is an example of the City doing that and to suggest that any project using composite wood could not rely on that would render the State’s efforts. With respect to the biological impacts, he informed that an expert study was completed and provided substantial evidence.

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Stickler, to approve Resolution Nos. 2024-082, 2024-083 and 2024-084. Motion carried 5-0.

H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)

H1. Review of Pedestrian Access from Arabian Drive to Heritage Park (CITY)

City Manager Gillison introduced Jennifer Nakamura, Deputy Director of Planning, who gave the staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item H1.

Council Member Stickler announced that she met with community members and listened to their concerns regarding public safety for young athletes, families and residents. She shared her support for their requests for a permanent gate to restrict general public access from Arabian Drive. She added that she would like to consider other neighborhoods in the community with similar pedestrian access issues.

Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy thanked Ms. Brennan, Mr. Greer, Mr. Yapur and Mr. Valdez for sharing their concerns and assured that it is a consideration of safety and the history of the community and that she supports their requests for a permanent gate to restrict general public access from Arabian Drive.

Mayor Michael thanked speakers and noted that the decision is being made with public safety in mind.

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Stickler, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to leave the fence up to restrict general public access from Arabian Drive and replac e the keyed gate with a fence to restrict select access. Motion carried 5-0.

H2. Consideration of a Letter of Support for Route 66 Inland Empire California's Community Project Funding Request to Rebuild the Garage Located Behind the Historic Cucamonga Service Station on U.S. Route 66. (CITY)

City Manager Gillison provided a verbal report for item H2. He shared the history of the Historic Cucamonga Service Station and asked the City Council to consider authorizing supporting the Route 66 Inland Empire California's Community Project request for funding to rebuild the garage located behind the Historic Cucamonga Service Station. He noted that a letter of support from the City would increase their chances and opportunities when applying for grants.

Council Member Scott shared her support and stated that it was an iconic opportunity for the City to help community partners raise funds to rebuild the garage behind the Historic Cucamonga Service Station.

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to authorize the submission of a letter of support for Route 66 Inland Empire California’s (IECA) Community Project Funding Request for $750,000 to rebuild the garage located behind the Historic Cucamonga Service Station on U.S.

Route 66. Motion carried 5-0.

Page 13 ends

City Manager Gillison introduced Zack Neighbors, Director of Building & Safety and Matt Marquez, Director of Planning and Economic Development, who provided the staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item H3.

City Council received and filed report.

I. COUNCIL BUSINESS

I1. Designation of Voting Delegates and Alternates for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting. (CITY)

MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Stickler, to approve Voting Delegate, Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, and Alternate Voting Delegate, Council Member Scott, for the League of California Cities Annual Business Meeting. Motion carried 5-0.

I2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS

None.

I3. INTERAGENCY UPDATES

None.

J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS

City Attorney Ghirelli noted that there was no reportable action taken during Closed Session held earlier that evening.

K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING

None.

L. ADJOURNMENT

Mayor Michael adjourned the Council Meeting at 9:08 p.m.

Approved:

Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director

Page 14 ends

DATE:September 4, 2024
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Tori Roberts, Interim Finance Director
Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,435,416.10 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (No Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $13,205,840.86 Dated August 12, 2024, Through August 25, 2024. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $1,323,978.37 and $1,111,437.73 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $12,635.850.45 and $569,990.41 for the City and the Fire District, respectively.

BACKGROUND:

N/A
ANALYSIS:

N/A
FISCAL IMPACT:

Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

N/A
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register

Page 15 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 1 of 27 ends

Company: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Payment Date On or After: 08/12/2024
Payment Date On or Before: 08/25/2024
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: C V W D: 08/12/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446801 08/12/2024 C V W D 180,404.85 0 180,404.85
Supplier Payment: C V W D: 08/12/2024 Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
446800 08/12/2024 C V W D 0 1,074.32 1,074.32
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 San Bernardino County 391.00 0 391.00
Supplier Payment: Torti Gallas &
Partners Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447066 08/14/2024 Torti Gallas & Partners Inc 687.50 0 687.50 Supplier Payment: Musicland:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Musicland 462.00 0 462.00
Supplier Payment: Naumann Hobbs
Material Handling: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447033 08/14/2024 Naumann Hobbs Material
Handling
6,132.62 0 6,132.62
Supplier Payment: Amlon Industries Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446962 08/14/2024 Amlon Industries Inc 1,435.40 0 1,435.40 Supplier Payment: Goldstar Asphalt
Products: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447004 08/14/2024 Goldstar Asphalt Products 358.61 0 358.61 Supplier Payment: Ferguson Enterprises
Llc #1350: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446998 08/14/2024 Ferguson Enterprises Llc #1350 2,819.98 0 2,819.98 Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446960 08/14/2024 Airgas Usa Llc 1,543.12 0 1,543.12
Supplier Payment: Sumuri Llc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447061 08/14/2024 Sumuri Llc 32,370.00 0 32,370.00
Supplier Payment: Ninyo & Moore:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Ninyo & Moore 10,786.00 0 10,786.00
Supplier Payment: Human Performance
Training and Consulting Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447012 08/14/2024 Human Performance Training
and Consulting Inc
425.00 0 425.00
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County Clerk: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447052 08/14/2024 San Bernardino County Clerk 50.00 0 50.00 Supplier Payment: Globalstar Usa:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447002 08/14/2024 Globalstar Usa 180.08 0 180.08
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Napa Auto Parts 903.76 0 903.76
ATTACHMENT 1

Page 16 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 2 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Southern California
News Group: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447059 08/14/2024 Southern California News Group 13,336.96 0 13,336.96 Supplier Payment: Crafco Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Crafco Inc 1,073.51 0 1,073.51
Supplier Payment: Elecnor Belco
Electric Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Elecnor Belco Electric Inc 67,014.70 0 67,014.70 Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447038 08/14/2024 Odp Business Solutions Llc 0 908.05 908.05 Supplier Payment: I Create
Professionals Consulting: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447013 08/14/2024 I Create Professionals Consulting 0 17,000.00 17,000.00 Supplier Payment: Toro Towing:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447065 08/14/2024 Toro Towing 2,600.00 0 2,600.00
Supplier Payment: Jorry Keith:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Jorry Keith 1,557.00 0 1,557.00
Supplier Payment: United Site Services:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447068 08/14/2024 United Site Services 237.87 0 237.87
Supplier Payment: Underground Service
Alert/Sc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447067 08/14/2024 Underground Service Alert/Sc 204.25 0 204.25 Supplier Payment: Climatec Llc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446983 08/14/2024 Climatec Llc 3,082.67 0 3,082.67
Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc:
08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
446959 08/14/2024 Airgas Usa Llc 0 5.76 5.76
Supplier Payment: Anthony Maxwell:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446964 08/14/2024 Anthony Maxwell 72.00 0 72.00
Supplier Payment: Bauer Compressors
Inc: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/14/2024 Bauer Compressors Inc 0 8,361.41 8,361.41
Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447037 08/14/2024 Odp Business Solutions Llc 6,314.31 0 6,314.31 Supplier Payment: Presidio Networked
Solutions Group LLC: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447042 08/14/2024 Presidio Networked Solutions
Group LLC
104,279.41 0 104,279.41
Supplier Payment: Allied Universal
Security Services: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446961 08/14/2024 Allied Universal Security
Services
20,384.08 0 20,384.08

Page 17 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 3 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Ninyo & Moore:
08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/14/2024 Ninyo & Moore 0 1,516.00 1,516.00
Supplier Payment: Chief Electric Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446977 08/14/2024 Chief Electric Inc 7,628.38 0 7,628.38 Supplier Payment: Mutual Propane:
08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447031 08/14/2024 Mutual Propane 0 1,977.94 1,977.94
Supplier Payment: Prime Glass:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447043 08/14/2024 Prime Glass 382.93 0 382.93
Supplier Payment: William Vasta
Photography: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447084 08/14/2024 William Vasta Photography 1,000.00 0 1,000.00 Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447000 08/14/2024 Frontier Comm 7,824.82 0 7,824.82
Supplier Payment: California Academy
For Economic Development: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446974 08/14/2024 California Academy For
Economic Development
4,340.00 0 4,340.00
Supplier Payment: Music Tree:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447030 08/14/2024 Music Tree 1,944.00 0 1,944.00
Supplier Payment: Coast Recreation Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446985 08/14/2024 Coast Recreation Inc 1,284.29 0 1,284.29 Supplier Payment: Auto & Rv Specialists
Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446969 08/14/2024 Auto & Rv Specialists Inc 80.45 0 80.45 Supplier Payment: Imeg Consultants
Corp: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447016 08/14/2024 Imeg Consultants Corp 19,136.00 0 19,136.00 Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447051 08/14/2024 San Bernardino County 15,216.72 0 15,216.72 Supplier Payment: International
Accreditation Services: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447019 08/14/2024 International Accreditation
Services
100.00 0 100.00
Supplier Payment: California Ppe Recon
Inc: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
446975 08/14/2024 California Ppe Recon Inc 0 2,389.00 2,389.00 Supplier Payment: Level 3
Communications Llc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447022 08/14/2024 Level 3 Communications Llc 4,030.66 0 4,030.66 Supplier Payment: Federal Express
Corp: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446996 08/14/2024 Federal Express Corp 107.97 0 107.97
Supplier Payment: Palmer Consulting:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Palmer Consulting 7,875.00 0 7,875.00
Supplier Payment: Midwest Veterinary
Supply Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447028 08/14/2024 Midwest Veterinary Supply Inc 577.77 0 577.77

Page 18 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 4 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Placeworks:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Placeworks 999.60 0 999.60
Supplier Payment: Grainger: 08/14/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447005 08/14/2024 Grainger 4,683.01 0 4,683.01
Supplier Payment: Hernandez Group
Llc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447009 08/14/2024 Hernandez Group Llc 116.31 0 116.31
Supplier Payment: FBI-LEEDA Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446995 08/14/2024 FBI-LEEDA Inc 350.00 0 350.00
Supplier Payment: Golden Oaks Vet
Hospital: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447003 08/14/2024 Golden Oaks Vet Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Supplier Payment: Aufbau Corporation:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446968 08/14/2024 Aufbau Corporation 61,983.50 0 61,983.50 Supplier Payment: Ontario Ice Skating
Center: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447039 08/14/2024 Ontario Ice Skating Center 1,848.00 0 1,848.00 Supplier Payment: Advanced Chemical
Transport Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446958 08/14/2024 Advanced Chemical Transport
Inc
1,254.50 0 1,254.50
Supplier Payment: Mission
Reprographics: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447029 08/14/2024 Mission Reprographics 503.73 0 503.73 Supplier Payment: Nv5 Inc: 08/14/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447034 08/14/2024 Nv5 Inc 15,926.16 0 15,926.16
Supplier Payment: Verizon Business:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447073 08/14/2024 Verizon Business 7,439.98 0 7,439.98
Supplier Payment: Bmla Inc: 08/14/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446971 08/14/2024 Bmla Inc 10,090.00 0 10,090.00
Supplier Payment: Apx Inc: 08/14/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446965 08/14/2024 Apx Inc 1,091.16 0 1,091.16
Supplier Payment: Daisyeco Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446989 08/14/2024 Daisyeco Inc 400.24 0 400.24
Supplier Payment: Mwi Animal Health:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447032 08/14/2024 Mwi Animal Health 1,524.55 0 1,524.55 Supplier Payment: Pacific Mh
Construction Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447040 08/14/2024 Pacific Mh Construction Inc 1,447.50 0 1,447.50 Supplier Payment: Sterling Coffee
Service: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447060 08/14/2024 Sterling Coffee Service 676.10 0 676.10 Supplier Payment: Unity Courier Service
Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447069 08/14/2024 Unity Courier Service Inc 1,424.25 0 1,424.25 Supplier Payment: L S A Associates Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447025 08/14/2024 L S A Associates Inc 970.00 0 970.00
Supplier Payment: Virtual Project
Manager Llc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447077 08/14/2024 Virtual Project Manager Llc 500.00 0 500.00 Supplier Payment: Richards Watson &
Gershon: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Richards Watson & Gershon 77,569.88 0 77,569.88

Page 19 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 5 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary
Supply: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447081 08/14/2024 Waxie Sanitary Supply 11,057.84 0 11,057.84 Supplier Payment: Safety-Kleen
Systems Inc: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447050 08/14/2024 Safety-Kleen Systems Inc 0 289.16 289.16 Supplier Payment: B & H Photo-Video:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446970 08/14/2024 B & H Photo-Video 1,006.17 0 1,006.17 Supplier Payment: Aufbau Corporation:
08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
446967 08/14/2024 Aufbau Corporation 0 78,025.00 78,025.00 Supplier Payment: Jade Michael Anne
Sigurdson: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447020 08/14/2024 Jade Michael Anne Sigurdson 1,800.00 0 1,800.00 Supplier Payment: Oclc Inc: 08/14/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447036 08/14/2024 Oclc Inc 13,463.62 0 13,463.62
Supplier Payment: Eighth Avenue
Enterprise Llc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446991 08/14/2024 Eighth Avenue Enterprise Llc 290.67 0 290.67 Supplier Payment: Rancho Smog
Center: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447045 08/14/2024 Rancho Smog Center 49.95 0 49.95
Supplier Payment: Sonsray Machinery
Llc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447057 08/14/2024 Sonsray Machinery Llc 940.02 0 940.02 Supplier Payment: Verizon Wireless -
La: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447074 08/14/2024 Verizon Wireless - La 3,183.22 0 3,183.22 Supplier Payment: Amazon Web
Services Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Amazon Web Services Inc 7,070.33 0 7,070.33
Supplier Payment: G/M Business
Interiors: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 G/M Business Interiors 46,425.16 0 46,425.16 Supplier Payment: Verizon Business:
08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447072 08/14/2024 Verizon Business 0 4,886.76 4,886.76
Supplier Payment: Rdo Equipment
Company: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Rdo Equipment Company 1,426.50 0 1,426.50
Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation:
08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
446979 08/14/2024 Cintas Corporation 0 58.64 58.64
Supplier Payment: Johnny Allen Tennis
Academy: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Johnny Allen Tennis Academy 785.40 0 785.40
Supplier Payment: Verizon: 08/14/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447071 08/14/2024 Verizon 55.51 0 55.51

Page 20 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 6 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Inland Empire
Property Service Inc: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447017 08/14/2024 Inland Empire Property Service
Inc
0 20,289.75 20,289.75
Supplier Payment: Brightview
Landscape Services Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Brightview Landscape Services
Inc
22,747.22 0 22,747.22
Supplier Payment: Cambridge Seven
Associates Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446976 08/14/2024 Cambridge Seven Associates Inc 6,486.14 0 6,486.14 Supplier Payment: Michael Baker
International Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Michael Baker International Inc 23,902.10 0 23,902.10 Supplier Payment: Rcpfa: 08/14/2024 Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/14/2024 Rcpfa 0 14,583.91 14,583.91
Supplier Payment: Dlr Group Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Dlr Group Inc 73,898.75 0 73,898.75
Supplier Payment: Merrimac Petroleum
Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 3,207.71 0 3,207.71
Supplier Payment: Victoria Animal
Hospital: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447075 08/14/2024 Victoria Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Supplier Payment: Personal Exposure
Reporting: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447041 08/14/2024 Personal Exposure Reporting 0 1,190.00 1,190.00 Supplier Payment: Claremont Courier:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446982 08/14/2024 Claremont Courier 1,975.00 0 1,975.00 Supplier Payment: Soca Arts:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447055 08/14/2024 Soca Arts 1,958.40 0 1,958.40
Supplier Payment: Occupational Health
Centers Of Ca: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447035 08/14/2024 Occupational Health Centers Of
Ca
4,055.00 0 4,055.00
Supplier Payment: Consolidated
Electrical Distr Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Consolidated Electrical Distr Inc 1,128.99 0 1,128.99 Supplier Payment: Vision
Communications Co: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447078 08/14/2024 Vision Communications Co 1,112.00 0 1,112.00 Supplier Payment: Am-Tec Total
Security Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446963 08/14/2024 Am-Tec Total Security Inc 3,367.34 0 3,367.34 Supplier Payment: Fleetpride:
08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
446999 08/14/2024 Fleetpride 0 1,668.27 1,668.27
Supplier Payment: Abc Locksmiths Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Abc Locksmiths Inc 521.06 0 521.06

Page 21 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 7 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Advance Auto Parts:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446957 08/14/2024 Advance Auto Parts 203.21 0 203.21
Supplier Payment: Insight Public Sector
Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447018 08/14/2024 Insight Public Sector Inc 24,560.77 0 24,560.77 Supplier Payment: EMG LLC:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 EMG LLC 19,867.71 0 19,867.71
Supplier Payment: Garrett Management
Group LLC: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Garrett Management Group LLC 24,903.30 0 24,903.30 Supplier Payment: Crime Scene Steri-
Clean Llc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Crime Scene Steri-Clean Llc 320.00 0 320.00
Supplier Payment: Target Solutions
Learning Llc: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447063 08/14/2024 Target Solutions Learning Llc 0 5,360.00 5,360.00 Supplier Payment: Vision Service Plan
Ca: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447079 08/14/2024 Vision Service Plan Ca 22,937.88 0 22,937.88 Supplier Payment: Lu'S Lighthouse Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447026 08/14/2024 Lu'S Lighthouse Inc 524.58 0 524.58
Supplier Payment: Rialto Power
Equipment Co: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447048 08/14/2024 Rialto Power Equipment Co 0 1,686.67 1,686.67 Supplier Payment: Victor Medical
Company: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447076 08/14/2024 Victor Medical Company 4,793.90 0 4,793.90 Supplier Payment: Calif
Intergovernmental Risk Authority:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446973 08/14/2024 Calif Intergovernmental Risk
Authority
3,102,837.18 0 3,102,837.18
Supplier Payment: Sharon Ott:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Sharon Ott 1,854.00 0 1,854.00
Supplier Payment: H L Hitchcock
Construction Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447010 08/14/2024 H L Hitchcock Construction Inc 303,292.62 0 303,292.62 Supplier Payment: Data Ticket Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Data Ticket Inc 486.55 0 486.55
Supplier Payment: Sovic Creative:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Sovic Creative 2,000.00 0 2,000.00
Supplier Payment: West End Material
Supply: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447083 08/14/2024 West End Material Supply 416.43 0 416.43 Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Psa Print Group 167.25 0 167.25
Supplier Payment: Ups: 08/14/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447070 08/14/2024 Ups 67.12 0 67.12

Page 22 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 8 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Dunn-Edwards
Corporation: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 1,520.69 0 1,520.69 Supplier Payment: Midwest Tape Llc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Midwest Tape Llc 7,749.11 0 7,749.11
Supplier Payment: Everde Growers:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446993 08/14/2024 Everde Growers 2,570.16 0 2,570.16
Supplier Payment: Chino Mower &
Equipment: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446978 08/14/2024 Chino Mower & Equipment 2,756.20 0 2,756.20 Supplier Payment: Record Management
Software Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447046 08/14/2024 Record Management Software
Inc
450.00 0 450.00
Supplier Payment: Consolidated
Electrical Distr Inc: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/14/2024 Consolidated Electrical Distr Inc 0 769.34 769.34 Supplier Payment: Citrus Motors Ontario
Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446981 08/14/2024 Citrus Motors Ontario Inc 1,739.70 0 1,739.70 Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory
Printing Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447006 08/14/2024 Graphics Factory Printing Inc 1,689.53 0 1,689.53 Supplier Payment: Bordin Semmer Llp:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446972 08/14/2024 Bordin Semmer Llp 1,305.00 0 1,305.00 Supplier Payment: Social Vocational
Services: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447056 08/14/2024 Social Vocational Services 4,320.00 0 4,320.00 Supplier Payment: Triden Group Corp:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Triden Group Corp 18,601.50 0 18,601.50
Supplier Payment: Convergint
Technologies Llc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446986 08/14/2024 Convergint Technologies Llc 2,408.80 0 2,408.80 Supplier Payment: Corodata Media
Storage Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446987 08/14/2024 Corodata Media Storage Inc 90.10 0 90.10 Supplier Payment: 49Er
Communications Inc: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
446956 08/14/2024 49Er Communications Inc 0 935.00 935.00 Supplier Payment: Express Brake
Supply Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446994 08/14/2024 Express Brake Supply Inc 117.16 0 117.16 Supplier Payment: Restaurant
Equipment Fabricators: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447047 08/14/2024 Restaurant Equipment
Fabricators
14,088.29 0 14,088.29
Supplier Payment: Happyornot
Americas Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447008 08/14/2024 Happyornot Americas Inc 9,030.01 0 9,030.01 Supplier Payment: Ignite Culture Inc:
08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447014 08/14/2024 Ignite Culture Inc 0 1,416.27 1,416.27

Page 23 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 9 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Tomco Cng Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447064 08/14/2024 Tomco Cng Inc 2,880.00 0 2,880.00
Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric
Company Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447007 08/14/2024 Graybar Electric Company Inc 18,489.78 0 18,489.78 Supplier Payment: Dell Marketing Lp:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446990 08/14/2024 Dell Marketing Lp 11,849.31 0 11,849.31 Supplier Payment: La Verne Power
Equipment INC: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447021 08/14/2024 La Verne Power Equipment INC 1,450.77 0 1,450.77 Supplier Payment: Mcfadden-Dale
Hardware: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447027 08/14/2024 Mcfadden-Dale Hardware 483.54 0 483.54 Supplier Payment: Enko Systems Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446992 08/14/2024 Enko Systems Inc 86,305.51 0 86,305.51 Supplier Payment: Illinois Library
Association: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447015 08/14/2024 Illinois Library Association 472.30 0 472.30 Supplier Payment: Wilson Fiallos:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447086 08/14/2024 Wilson Fiallos 243.00 0 243.00
Supplier Payment: Audienceview
Ticketing Corporation: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446966 08/14/2024 Audienceview Ticketing
Corporation
3,404.90 0 3,404.90
Supplier Payment: Lenovo (United
States) Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Lenovo (United States) Inc 7,214.90 0 7,214.90 Supplier Payment: Zep Sales And
Service: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447087 08/14/2024 Zep Sales And Service 1,354.38 0 1,354.38 Supplier Payment: Rancho Cucamonga
Quakes: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447044 08/14/2024 Rancho Cucamonga Quakes 2,226.50 0 2,226.50 Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446980 08/14/2024 Cintas Corporation 3,065.03 0 3,065.03 Supplier Payment: Fehr & Peers:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Fehr & Peers 3,996.50 0 3,996.50
Supplier Payment: Ida Tyus: 08/14/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Ida Tyus 900.00 0 900.00
Supplier Payment: Coast Fitness Repair
Shop: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
446984 08/14/2024 Coast Fitness Repair Shop 6,707.98 0 6,707.98 Supplier Payment: Lilburn Corporation:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447023 08/14/2024 Lilburn Corporation 6,431.75 0 6,431.75 Supplier Payment: Fuel Serv:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447001 08/14/2024 Fuel Serv 2,166.58 0 2,166.58
Supplier Payment: Southern California
Edison: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447058 08/14/2024 Southern California Edison 136.40 0 136.40 Supplier Payment: Lozano Smith Llp:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447024 08/14/2024 Lozano Smith Llp 145.00 0 145.00
Supplier Payment: Wilson & Bell Auto
Service: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447085 08/14/2024 Wilson & Bell Auto Service 165.00 0 165.00

Page 24 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 10 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Federal Express
Freight: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
446997 08/14/2024 Federal Express Freight 0 336.20 336.20 Supplier Payment: Silent 6 Llc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447053 08/14/2024 Silent 6 Llc 11,395.00 0 11,395.00
Supplier Payment: Graves & King Llp:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Graves & King Llp 7,328.08 0 7,328.08
Supplier Payment: Holliday Rock Co Inc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447011 08/14/2024 Holliday Rock Co Inc 1,461.09 0 1,461.09 Supplier Payment: West Coast Arborists
Inc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447082 08/14/2024 West Coast Arborists Inc 1,338.40 0 1,338.40 Supplier Payment: Vigilant Solutions Llc:
08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 Vigilant Solutions Llc 4,684.36 0 4,684.36
Supplier Payment: Robert Huddleston:
08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447049 08/14/2024 Robert Huddleston 0 700.00 700.00
Supplier Payment: Cummins Sales &
Service: 08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
446988 08/14/2024 Cummins Sales & Service 0 2,319.46 2,319.46 Supplier Payment: Sun Badge Co:
08/14/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447062 08/14/2024 Sun Badge Co 0 4,708.03 4,708.03
Supplier Payment: National Utility
Locators Llc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/14/2024 National Utility Locators Llc 5,325.00 0 5,325.00 Supplier Payment: Siteone Landscape
Supply Llc: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447054 08/14/2024 Siteone Landscape Supply Llc 4,982.37 0 4,982.37 Supplier Payment: Vulcan Materials
Company: 08/14/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447080 08/14/2024 Vulcan Materials Company 116.38 0 116.38 Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
08/15/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447089 08/15/2024 Frontier Comm 2,903.87 0 2,903.87
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
08/15/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447088 08/15/2024 Frontier Comm 0 819.37 819.37
Supplier Payment: Lowes Companies
Inc: 08/19/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447091 08/19/2024 Lowes Companies Inc 8,950.00 0 8,950.00

Page 25 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 11 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Lowes Companies
Inc: 08/19/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447090 08/19/2024 Lowes Companies Inc 0 3,682.91 3,682.91 Supplier Payment: Richard Toll:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Richard Toll 0 2,784.82 2,784.82
Supplier Payment: Victoria Bantau:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Victoria Bantau 0 616.10 616.10
Supplier Payment: Michael L Bell:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Michael L Bell 0 2,105.94 2,105.94
Supplier Payment: Joe Longo:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Joe Longo 0 167.79 167.79
Supplier Payment: Cheryl L Roberts:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Cheryl L Roberts 0 2,824.84 2,824.84
Supplier Payment: Tom O'Brien:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Tom O'Brien 0 2,105.94 2,105.94
Supplier Payment: Wilbur Crossland:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Wilbur Crossland 0 492.58 492.58
Supplier Payment: John D Fritchey:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 John D Fritchey 0 616.10 616.10
Supplier Payment: Steven Campbell:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Steven Campbell 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Lloyd Almand:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Lloyd Almand 0 291.15 291.15

Page 26 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 12 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Michael J Ploung:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Michael J Ploung 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Paul E Lenze:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Paul E Lenze 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: David W Larkin:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 David W Larkin 0 708.41 708.41
Supplier Payment: Michael Eagleson:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Michael Eagleson 0 2,105.94 2,105.94
Supplier Payment: Terry Tuley:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Terry Tuley 0 2,105.94 2,105.94
Supplier Payment: Thomas Salisbury:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Thomas Salisbury 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: William M Kirkpatrick:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 William M Kirkpatrick 0 855.67 855.67
Supplier Payment: Robert Anthony
Corcoran: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Robert Anthony Corcoran 0 974.47 974.47
Supplier Payment: James Dague:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 James Dague 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Kevin Walton:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Kevin Walton 0 1,135.35 1,135.35
Supplier Payment: Beverly Mackall:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Beverly Mackall 0 167.79 167.79

Page 27 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 13 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Patrick Proulx:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Patrick Proulx 0 1,422.62 1,422.62
Supplier Payment: Francis
Vanderkallen: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Francis Vanderkallen 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Kenneth Mcneil:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Kenneth Mcneil 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Byron Morgan:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Byron Morgan 0 479.86 479.86
Supplier Payment: Peter Magnuson:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Peter Magnuson 0 2,146.00 2,146.00
Supplier Payment: Brent Roberts:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Brent Roberts 0 989.86 989.86
Supplier Payment: Kenneth Walker:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447093 08/21/2024 Kenneth Walker 0 291.15 291.15
Supplier Payment: Tim Fejeran:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Tim Fejeran 0 2,093.07 2,093.07
Supplier Payment: Rosalyn Interlicchia:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Rosalyn Interlicchia 0 291.15 291.15
Supplier Payment: Scott D Sorensen:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Scott D Sorensen 0 1,438.01 1,438.01
Supplier Payment: Robert Eggers:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Robert Eggers 0 739.30 739.30

Page 28 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 14 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Eric Noreen:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Eric Noreen 0 2,784.82 2,784.82
Supplier Payment: William Spain:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 William Spain 0 492.58 492.58
Supplier Payment: David Berry:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 David Berry 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Michael Nauman:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Michael Nauman 0 492.58 492.58
Supplier Payment: John Mckee:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 John Mckee 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Kenneth Carnes:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Kenneth Carnes 0 167.79 167.79
Supplier Payment: Robin Brock:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Robin Brock 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: James Curatalo:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 James Curatalo 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: William Lane:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 William Lane 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Ron Mayfield:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Ron Mayfield 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Anthony Varney:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Anthony Varney 0 739.30 739.30

Page 29 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 15 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Viola Spagnolo:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447095 08/21/2024 Viola Spagnolo 0 248.83 248.83
Supplier Payment: Alexander R
Ahumada: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Alexander R Ahumada 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Steven Taylor:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Steven Taylor 0 2,105.94 2,105.94
Supplier Payment: James Sullivan:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 James Sullivan 0 492.58 492.58
Supplier Payment: Michael Redmond:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Michael Redmond 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Gerald Campbell:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Gerald Campbell 0 492.58 492.58
Supplier Payment: Michael R Post:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Michael R Post 0 2,136.72 2,136.72
Supplier Payment: Ivan M Rojer:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Ivan M Rojer 0 2,093.07 2,093.07
Supplier Payment: Victor Rodriguez:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447094 08/21/2024 Victor Rodriguez 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Timothy A Yowell:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Timothy A Yowell 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Susan Bazal:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Susan Bazal 0 291.15 291.15

Page 30 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 16 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Donald R Cloughesy:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Donald R Cloughesy 0 2,105.94 2,105.94
Supplier Payment: Darrell Luttrull:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Darrell Luttrull 0 492.58 492.58
Supplier Payment: Allan J Lee:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Allan J Lee 0 291.15 291.15
Supplier Payment: Dennis Myskow:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Dennis Myskow 0 1,573.82 1,573.82
Supplier Payment: Charlene Dominick:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447092 08/21/2024 Charlene Dominick 0 291.15 291.15
Supplier Payment: Danny G Holt:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Danny G Holt 0 1,652.90 1,652.90
Supplier Payment: Ralph Crane:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Ralph Crane 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Patrick Jerkins:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Patrick Jerkins 0 1,573.82 1,573.82
Supplier Payment: L. Dennis Michael:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 L. Dennis Michael 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Jay Davenport:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Jay Davenport 0 2,824.84 2,824.84
Supplier Payment: Karl Cox: 08/21/2024 Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Karl Cox 0 739.30 739.30

Page 31 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 17 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Jeffrey Roeder:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Jeffrey Roeder 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Stephen Kilmer:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Stephen Kilmer 0 1,573.82 1,573.82
Supplier Payment: Ronald Smith:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Ronald Smith 0 492.58 492.58
Supplier Payment: Philip Loncar:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Philip Loncar 0 2,136.72 2,136.72
Supplier Payment: Jackie Deans:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Jackie Deans 0 291.15 291.15
Supplier Payment: Dennis M Costello:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Dennis M Costello 0 2,824.84 2,824.84
Supplier Payment: Mary Jane Nelson:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Mary Jane Nelson 0 167.79 167.79
Supplier Payment: Richard Clabby:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Richard Clabby 0 654.66 654.66
Supplier Payment: Donald Heyde:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Donald Heyde 0 739.30 739.30
Supplier Payment: Susan De Antonio:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Susan De Antonio 0 974.47 974.47
Supplier Payment: Alma Arocho:
08/22/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/22/2024 Alma Arocho 1,574.40 0 1,574.40
Supplier Payment: Mariposa
Landscapes Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 20,050.51 0 20,050.51

Page 32 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 18 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Rha Landscape
Architects-Planners Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447192 08/21/2024 Rha Landscape Architects-
Planners Inc
9,020.82 0 9,020.82
Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric
Company Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447145 08/21/2024 Graybar Electric Company Inc 21,192.27 0 21,192.27 Supplier Payment: Boehringer Ingelheim
Animal Health Usa Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447108 08/21/2024 Boehringer Ingelheim Animal
Health Usa Inc
230.80 0 230.80
Supplier Payment: Shoeteria Inc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Shoeteria Inc 11,426.19 0 11,426.19
Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447100 08/21/2024 Airgas Usa Llc 2,311.61 0 2,311.61
Supplier Payment: Work Boot
Warehouse: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447227 08/21/2024 Work Boot Warehouse 1,895.30 0 1,895.30 Supplier Payment: Upland Animal
Hospital: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447219 08/21/2024 Upland Animal Hospital 369.36 0 369.36 Supplier Payment: Thomson Reuters -
West: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447211 08/21/2024 Thomson Reuters - West 387.00 0 387.00 Supplier Payment: Cintas Corporation:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447114 08/21/2024 Cintas Corporation 0 561.41 561.41
Supplier Payment: Ferguson Enterprises
Llc #1350: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447132 08/21/2024 Ferguson Enterprises Llc #1350 4,336.77 0 4,336.77 Supplier Payment: David Freeman:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447125 08/21/2024 David Freeman 500.00 0 500.00
Supplier Payment: Haulaway Storage
Containers Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447146 08/21/2024 Haulaway Storage Containers
Inc
119.84 0 119.84
Supplier Payment: Advance Auto Parts:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447097 08/21/2024 Advance Auto Parts 904.11 0 904.11
Supplier Payment: Aflac: 08/21/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447099 08/21/2024 Aflac 5,817.24 0 5,817.24
Supplier Payment: Intelesys: 08/21/2024 Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447159 08/21/2024 Intelesys 0 1,043.85 1,043.85
Supplier Payment: Continental Girbau
West Llc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447117 08/21/2024 Continental Girbau West Llc 566.27 0 566.27 Supplier Payment: G/M Business
Interiors: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 G/M Business Interiors 0 44,083.46 44,083.46

Page 33 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 19 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Ln Curtis & Sons:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447170 08/21/2024 Ln Curtis & Sons 0 1,022.15 1,022.15
Supplier Payment: Inland Valley Daily
Bulletin: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447156 08/21/2024 Inland Valley Daily Bulletin 0 121.95 121.95 Supplier Payment: Victoria Animal
Hospital: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447221 08/21/2024 Victoria Animal Hospital 300.00 0 300.00 Supplier Payment: Department Of
Industrial Relations: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447126 08/21/2024 Department Of Industrial
Relations
675.00 0 675.00
Supplier Payment: Moffatt & Nichol:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Moffatt & Nichol 39,864.76 0 39,864.76
Supplier Payment: Brinks Incorporated:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Brinks Incorporated 2,992.89 0 2,992.89
Supplier Payment: Lenovo (United
States) Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Lenovo (United States) Inc 83,656.46 0 83,656.46 Supplier Payment: Humane Society Of
San Bernardino Valley: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447151 08/21/2024 Humane Society Of San
Bernardino Valley
117.00 0 117.00
Supplier Payment: Animal Health
Diagnostic Center: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447103 08/21/2024 Animal Health Diagnostic Center 213.50 0 213.50 Supplier Payment: Soca Arts:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447201 08/21/2024 Soca Arts 201.60 0 201.60
Supplier Payment: Krenz and Company
Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447167 08/21/2024 Krenz and Company Inc 1,216.35 0 1,216.35 Supplier Payment: Foothill Family
Shelter: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447134 08/21/2024 Foothill Family Shelter 7,500.00 0 7,500.00 Supplier Payment: Southern California
News Group: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447203 08/21/2024 Southern California News Group 5,936.12 0 5,936.12 Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Psa Print Group 0 615.47 615.47
Supplier Payment: Wt.Cox Information
Services: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447228 08/21/2024 Wt.Cox Information Services 10,965.61 0 10,965.61 Supplier Payment: Kaiser Foundation
Health Plan Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447163 08/21/2024 Kaiser Foundation Health Plan
Inc
262,872.51 0 262,872.51
Supplier Payment: Fehr & Peers:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Fehr & Peers 1,735.00 0 1,735.00
Supplier Payment: Inland Valley Dance
Academy: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447157 08/21/2024 Inland Valley Dance Academy 624.00 0 624.00

Page 34 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 20 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Sovic Creative:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Sovic Creative 4,500.00 0 4,500.00
Supplier Payment: Transtech Engineers
Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447212 08/21/2024 Transtech Engineers Inc 4,821.00 0 4,821.00 Supplier Payment: Dlr Group Inc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Dlr Group Inc 15,217.50 0 15,217.50
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County Flood Control District:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447198 08/21/2024 San Bernardino County Flood
Control District
264,849.00 0 264,849.00
Supplier Payment: Sycamore Villa
Mobile Home Park: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447207 08/21/2024 Sycamore Villa Mobile Home
Park
200.00 0 200.00
Supplier Payment: Calpers Long-Term
Care Program: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447112 08/21/2024 Calpers Long-Term Care
Program
442.70 0 442.70
Supplier Payment: Brodart Co:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447110 08/21/2024 Brodart Co 1,125.34 0 1,125.34
Supplier Payment: Constellation Energy
Generation Llc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Constellation Energy Generation
Llc
801,738.85 0 801,738.85
Supplier Payment: Truepoint Solutions:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Truepoint Solutions 495.00 0 495.00
Supplier Payment: Hci Environmental &
Engineering Svc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Hci Environmental & Engineering
Svc
14,461.58 0 14,461.58
Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Psa Print Group 336.70 0 336.70
Supplier Payment: Hi-Line Electric
Company: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447148 08/21/2024 Hi-Line Electric Company 2,137.00 0 2,137.00 Supplier Payment: Boot Barn Inc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447109 08/21/2024 Boot Barn Inc 1,853.54 0 1,853.54
Supplier Payment: Karen Clark:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447164 08/21/2024 Karen Clark 1,056.00 0 1,056.00
Supplier Payment: Inland Empire
Property Service Inc: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447153 08/21/2024 Inland Empire Property Service
Inc
0 68,592.88 68,592.88
Supplier Payment: Uline: 08/21/2024 Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447214 08/21/2024 Uline 0 320.27 320.27
Supplier Payment: Ewing Irrigation
Products Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447129 08/21/2024 Ewing Irrigation Products Inc 3,811.51 0 3,811.51

Page 35 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 21 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Cummins Sales &
Service: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447121 08/21/2024 Cummins Sales & Service 0 868.39 868.39 Supplier Payment: Motive Energy Llc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447177 08/21/2024 Motive Energy Llc 361.63 0 361.63
Supplier Payment: Collins & Collins Llp:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447115 08/21/2024 Collins & Collins Llp 10,042.50 0 10,042.50 Supplier Payment: Impact Southern
California: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Impact Southern California 12,060.00 0 12,060.00 Supplier Payment: Daisyeco Inc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447122 08/21/2024 Daisyeco Inc 1,676.03 0 1,676.03
Supplier Payment: Grainger: 08/21/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447142 08/21/2024 Grainger 2,382.65 0 2,382.65
Supplier Payment: Golden Oaks Vet
Hospital: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447140 08/21/2024 Golden Oaks Vet Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Supplier Payment: Ginger Dollarhide:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447139 08/21/2024 Ginger Dollarhide 13.20 0 13.20
Supplier Payment: Costar Realty
Information Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447119 08/21/2024 Costar Realty Information Inc 1,833.30 0 1,833.30 Supplier Payment: Dalton Trucking Inc:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447124 08/21/2024 Dalton Trucking Inc 0 830.00 830.00
Supplier Payment: Robert Morales:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447193 08/21/2024 Robert Morales 182.00 0 182.00
Supplier Payment: Kvl Tires Inc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Kvl Tires Inc 1,275.73 0 1,275.73
Supplier Payment: Animal Care
Equipment & Services: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447102 08/21/2024 Animal Care Equipment &
Services
187.26 0 187.26
Supplier Payment: Onward Engineering:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447186 08/21/2024 Onward Engineering 2,090.00 0 2,090.00 Supplier Payment: Vista Paint:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447224 08/21/2024 Vista Paint 1,142.28 0 1,142.28
Supplier Payment: Occupational Health
Centers Of Ca: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447182 08/21/2024 Occupational Health Centers Of
Ca
4,897.41 0 4,897.41
Supplier Payment: Covetrus North
America: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447120 08/21/2024 Covetrus North America 1,234.77 0 1,234.77 Supplier Payment: Mcfadden-Dale
Hardware: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447174 08/21/2024 Mcfadden-Dale Hardware 394.89 0 394.89 Supplier Payment: Merrimac Petroleum
Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 6,387.22 0 6,387.22

Page 36 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 22 of 27 ends

32.59 0 32.59
Supplier Payment: Merrimac Petroleum
Inc: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 0 27,937.01 27,937.01 Supplier Payment: Art-Z Mom Creations:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447105 08/21/2024 Art-Z Mom Creations 360.00 0 360.00
Supplier Payment: Inland Valley Hope
Partners: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447158 08/21/2024 Inland Valley Hope Partners 6,070.25 0 6,070.25 Supplier Payment: Delta Dental
Insurance Company: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Delta Dental Insurance Company 1,758.48 0 1,758.48 Supplier Payment: Nextech Systems
Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447180 08/21/2024 Nextech Systems Inc 1,011.55 0 1,011.55

Page 37 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 23 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Vsa Inc: 08/21/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447225 08/21/2024 Vsa Inc 3,136.00 0 3,136.00
Supplier Payment: Kimball Midwest:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447166 08/21/2024 Kimball Midwest 569.70 0 569.70
Supplier Payment: Freeway Toyota Of
Hanford: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447135 08/21/2024 Freeway Toyota Of Hanford 0 35,160.08 35,160.08 Supplier Payment: Johnny Allen Tennis
Academy: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Johnny Allen Tennis Academy 3,437.40 0 3,437.40 Supplier Payment: Underground Service
Alert/Sc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447215 08/21/2024 Underground Service Alert/Sc 167.50 0 167.50 Supplier Payment: Factory Motor Parts:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447130 08/21/2024 Factory Motor Parts 0 475.26 475.26
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino Co
Auditor Cont: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447196 08/21/2024 San Bernardino Co Auditor Cont 7,541.55 0 7,541.55 Supplier Payment: Inland Fair Housing &
Mediation Board: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447154 08/21/2024 Inland Fair Housing & Mediation
Board
6,907.41 0 6,907.41
Supplier Payment: Graceful Animal
Hospital: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447141 08/21/2024 Graceful Animal Hospital 800.00 0 800.00 Supplier Payment: Ccs Orange County
Janitorial Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447113 08/21/2024 Ccs Orange County Janitorial Inc 71,072.89 0 71,072.89 Supplier Payment: Minuteman Press:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447176 08/21/2024 Minuteman Press 1,410.95 0 1,410.95
Supplier Payment: Shred Pros:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447199 08/21/2024 Shred Pros 73.00 0 73.00
Supplier Payment: United Site Services:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447217 08/21/2024 United Site Services 305.29 0 305.29
Supplier Payment: Lozano Smith Llp:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447171 08/21/2024 Lozano Smith Llp 696.00 0 696.00
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447197 08/21/2024 San Bernardino County 0 16,395.48 16,395.48 Supplier Payment: Idexx Distribution Inc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447152 08/21/2024 Idexx Distribution Inc 42.46 0 42.46
Supplier Payment: United Rentals North
America Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447216 08/21/2024 United Rentals North America Inc 703.88 0 703.88 Supplier Payment: Holliday Rock Co Inc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447149 08/21/2024 Holliday Rock Co Inc 3,509.10 0 3,509.10

Page 38 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 24 of 27 ends

Grainger: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447143 08/21/2024 Grainger 374.33 0 374.33
Supplier Payment: Federal Signal
Corporation: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447131 08/21/2024 Federal Signal Corporation 0 3,983.06 3,983.06 Supplier Payment: Liebert Cassidy
Whitmore: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447169 08/21/2024 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 1,497.00 0 1,497.00 Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 San Bernardino County 0 14,320.00 14,320.00
Supplier Payment: Pepe'S Towing
Service: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447190 08/21/2024 Pepe'S Towing Service 540.00 0 540.00 Supplier Payment: Tryfytt: 08/21/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447213 08/21/2024 Tryfytt 763.00 0 763.00
Supplier Payment: Nbs: 08/21/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447179 08/21/2024 Nbs 13,777.50 0 13,777.50
Supplier Payment: Reach Media
Network: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447191 08/21/2024 Reach Media Network 2,000.00 0 2,000.00 Supplier Payment: Sound Image Inc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447202 08/21/2024 Sound Image Inc 290.00 0 290.00
Supplier Payment: Kwall Llc: 08/21/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447168 08/21/2024 Kwall Llc 37,500.00 0 37,500.00
Supplier Payment: Apple Inc.:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447104 08/21/2024 Apple Inc. 6,831.42 0 6,831.42
Supplier Payment: Bauer Compressors
Inc: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Bauer Compressors Inc 0 39,380.47 39,380.47
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Napa Auto Parts 0 2,488.61 2,488.61

Page 39 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 25 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Advantage Sealing
Systems Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447098 08/21/2024 Advantage Sealing Systems Inc 293.73 0 293.73 Supplier Payment: Vision Service Plan
Ca: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447223 08/21/2024 Vision Service Plan Ca 12,343.78 0 12,343.78 Supplier Payment: G/M Business
Interiors: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 G/M Business Interiors 14,895.41 0 14,895.41 Supplier Payment: Terra Vista Animal
Hospital: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447209 08/21/2024 Terra Vista Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Supplier Payment: Intervet Inc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447161 08/21/2024 Intervet Inc 5,387.50 0 5,387.50
Supplier Payment: Directv: 08/21/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447128 08/21/2024 Directv 100.99 0 100.99
Supplier Payment: International
Language School For: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 International Language School
For
2,131.50 0 2,131.50
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County Sheriff'S Dept: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 San Bernardino County Sheriff'S
Dept
4,260,140.00 0 4,260,140.00
Supplier Payment: Tech 24 Commercial
Foodservice Repair Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447208 08/21/2024 Tech 24 Commercial
Foodservice Repair Inc
8,187.50 0 8,187.50
Supplier Payment: Verizon Business:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447220 08/21/2024 Verizon Business 253.41 0 253.41
Supplier Payment: Pacific Mh
Construction Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447187 08/21/2024 Pacific Mh Construction Inc 40,261.50 0 40,261.50 Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447183 08/21/2024 Odp Business Solutions Llc 6,922.85 0 6,922.85 Supplier Payment: Heritage Wellness
Collective: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447147 08/21/2024 Heritage Wellness Collective 2,486.00 0 2,486.00 Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Napa Auto Parts 1,236.99 0 1,236.99
Supplier Payment: San Antonio
Regional Hospital: 08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447195 08/21/2024 San Antonio Regional Hospital 0 684.00 684.00 Supplier Payment: Paik Coffee
Company: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447188 08/21/2024 Paik Coffee Company 650.00 0 650.00
Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory
Printing Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447144 08/21/2024 Graphics Factory Printing Inc 211.19 0 211.19 Supplier Payment: Caceo: 08/21/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447111 08/21/2024 Caceo 459.00 0 459.00
Supplier Payment: International Institute
of Municipal Clerks: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447160 08/21/2024 International Institute of
Municipal Clerks
225.00 0 225.00
Supplier Payment: Convergint
Technologies Llc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447118 08/21/2024 Convergint Technologies Llc 6,190.00 0 6,190.00

Page 40 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 26 of 27 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Pars: 08/21/2024 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447189 08/21/2024 Pars 3,500.00 0 3,500.00
Supplier Payment: Diamond
Environmental Services: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Diamond Environmental Services 566.11 0 566.11 Supplier Payment: Karolyn Bast:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447165 08/21/2024 Karolyn Bast 528.00 0 528.00
Supplier Payment: Ontario Pro Soccer
Llc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447185 08/21/2024 Ontario Pro Soccer Llc 25,000.00 0 25,000.00 Supplier Payment: Marianna Giordano:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447173 08/21/2024 Marianna Giordano 189.00 0 189.00
Supplier Payment: Inland Overhead
Door Company: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447155 08/21/2024 Inland Overhead Door Company 3,162.25 0 3,162.25 Supplier Payment: Fleetpride:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447133 08/21/2024 Fleetpride 0 623.63 623.63
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447136 08/21/2024 Frontier Comm 45.38 0 45.38
Supplier Payment: Gentry General
Engineering Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Gentry General Engineering Inc 602,469.91 0 602,469.91 Supplier Payment: Conor Consulting Llc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447116 08/21/2024 Conor Consulting Llc 262.50 0 262.50
Supplier Payment: Northtown Housing
Development Corp: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447181 08/21/2024 Northtown Housing Development
Corp
17,641.94 0 17,641.94
Supplier Payment: Daisyeco Inc:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
447123 08/21/2024 Daisyeco Inc 0 421.74 421.74
Supplier Payment: Dlr Group Inc:
08/21/2024
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection
District
08/21/2024 Dlr Group Inc 0 53,265.00 53,265.00
Supplier Payment: Standard Insurance
Company: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447205 08/21/2024 Standard Insurance Company 14,470.99 0 14,470.99 Supplier Payment: Hose-Man Inc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447150 08/21/2024 Hose-Man Inc 426.92 0 426.92
Supplier Payment: R P Laurain &
Associates Inc: 08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447194 08/21/2024 R P Laurain & Associates Inc 5,200.00 0 5,200.00 Supplier Payment: General Code Llc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
447138 08/21/2024 General Code Llc 3,785.00 0 3,785.00
Supplier Payment: Gentry Brothers Inc:
08/21/2024
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
08/21/2024 Gentry Brothers Inc 601,367.18 0 601,367.18

Page 41 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
08:04 AM
08/26/2024

Page 27 of 27 ends

Page 42 ends

DATE:September 4, 2024
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Micah Martin, Public Works Services Director Mike McCliman, Fire Chief
Andy Miller, Public Works Facilities Superintendent
Andrea Bauer, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve a Single-Source Procurement and Execute a Contract with ASSI Security for the Purchase of Equipment and Phase II of the Security Access Control System Upgrade Project at Various City and Fire District Facilities in an Amount Not to Exceed $466,294 and Appropriate $62,100 from the Fire Protection Capital Fund Balance. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council and Board of Directors:

1. Approve a single-source procurement of access control equipment maintenance, repair, and installation from ASSI Security.

2. Award and authorize the execution of a contract with ASSI Security for the purchase of equipment and installation of an upgraded access control system at various City and Fire District facilities.

3. Authorize the expenditure of $429,549 plus a 10% contingency of $36,745 for a total project cost of $466,294.

4. Appropriate $62,100 from Fire Protection Capital Fund balance to account F288 CC501 SC7000.

BACKGROUND:

The access control system enables authorized staff, with varying security levels, to enter City facilities using key card readers. Originally installed in the late 1990s, the existing system includes card readers, control panels, computer software, and card keys. With an average lifespan of 20 years, the system has been in use well beyond its anticipated performance period. For over 24 years, the City and Fire District have been using a previously approved single source contract with ASSI Security to address annual maintenance and repairs, with ASSI Security exclusively managing the access control systems for the duration of the contract. Given the recent critical failure of an outdated system and the urgent need for an upgrade, ASSI Security is uniquely positioned to offer the specialized support and seamless integration required to resolve these issues.

In August 2023, the City Council approved Phase I of the security access control system upgrade project which addressed City facilities with the most outdated security systems, the Civic Center

Page 43 ends

Page 2 ends

2 5
0 8
and the Stadium. Phase I involved a comprehensive upgrade of the access control equipment at these critical locations, including replacing all card key readers with advanced, high-security, high- frequency models. The new security access control system consists of a double authenticator to prevent unauthorized breaches of data. The stronger security measures of the upgraded system also prevent the possibility of illegitimately duplicating key cards. These enhancements are essential for modernizing the access control systems and mitigating the risks associated with obsolete technology. Phase II (final phase) of the security access control system upgrade project includes upgrading the equipment and system at the remaining City and Fire District facilities including Archibald Library, Fleet Service Shop, RC Family Resource Center, Lions Center East, Lions Center West, Animal Care and Adoption Center, Victoria Gardens Cultural Center, Victoria Gardens Police Substation, Central Park, RCMU, RC Sports Center, Public Works Service Center, Fire Station 171, Fire Station 172 (Old), Fire Station 172 (Public Safety Facility), RCFD Evidence, Fire Station 173, Fire Station 174, All Risk Training Center, Fire Mechanic’s Shop, Fire Station 175, Fire Station 176, and Fire Station 177.

ANALYSIS:

ASSI Security provided the Public Works Services Department with a detailed scope of work and proposal for the purchase of new equipment and the cost to complete the final phase of the security access system upgrades at the remaining City and RCFPD facilities.

Most of the equipment needed for Phase II was purchased during Phase I of the project. However, while preparing the proposal for the Fire District facilities, it was discovered that the wireless card readers with integrated keypads have become obsolete and need to be upgraded to be compatible with the new system. This requires an appropriation of $62,100 to purchase the compatible equipment. If approved, a copy of the contract and single source justification form will be on file in the City Clerk’s Office.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Phase II of the security access control upgrade project is included in the FY 2024/2025 Budget except for the appropriation of $62,100 for the upgraded wireless card reader equipment needed for the Fire District Facilities. The total project amount of $466,294 for Phase II is outlined below:

Description Amount Fund Cost Center Spend
Category
City Facilities $280,479 F025 CC312 SC7000
Fire Facilities $123,715 F288 CC501 SC7000
Appropriation Request:

Equipment $62,100 F288 CC501 SC7000
Total: $466,294
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s core value of promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all by ensuring City facilities are properly secured and monitored.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Single-Source Procurement Form

Page 44 ends

D:\TempFiles\Temporary Internet Files\OLK21C\Sole Source Justification Form (3).doc

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE JUSTIFICATION
FOR PURCHASES $5,000 AND ABOVE
The below information is provided in support of my Department requesting approval for a single/sole source. Outside of a duly declared emergency, the time to develop a statement of work or specifications is not in itself justification for single or sole source.

Vendor:__
______________________________________Date: __________________ Commodity/Service:_____________________________________________________ Estimated expenditure: __________
________Your Name: ______________________
Extent of market search conducted:

Price Reasonableness:_________________________________________________ Does moving forward on this
product/service further obligate the City to future similar contract actual arrangements?
DEFINITIONS:

SINGLE SOURCE – a transaction with a business entity that is chosen, without competition, from among two or more business entities capable of supplying or providing the goods or services that meet the specified need.

SOLE SOURCE - A transaction with the only bus iness entity capable of supplyi ng or providing the goods or
services that meet the specified need.

Initial all entries below that apply to the proposed purchase (more than one entry will apply to most single/sole source products/services request ed). If needed, attach a memorandum containing complete justification and support documentation as directed in initial entry.

THIS IS A SINGLE SOURCE THIS IS A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE (check one).

1. _______ SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS FOR THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER, THERE ARE NO REGIONAL DISTRIBUTORS. (Item no. 3 also must also be completed).

2. _______ THE PARTS/EQUIPM ENT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER. (Explain in separate memorandum).

ATTACHMENT 1
ASSI Security
September 4, 2024
Security Access Control System Upgrade
$466,294
Andrea Bauer
Competitive
no
✔

Page 45 ends

Single/Sole Source Justification Form

Page 2 ends

D:\TempFiles\Temporary Internet Files\OLK21C\Sole Source Justification Form (3).doc 1/18/07

3. _______ THIS IS THE ONLY KNOWN ITEM OR SERVICE THAT WILL MEET THE

SPECIALIZED NEEDS OF THIS DEPARTMENT OR PERFORM THE INTENDED FUNCTION. (
Attach memorandum with details of specialized function or application).

4. _______ UNIQUE FEATURES OF THE SUPPL Y/SERVICE BEING REQUESTED. THERE IS NO ALTERNATIVE SUPPLIER. (Attach memorandum with reasons why these unique features are and what benefit the City will accrue.)

5. _______ THE PARTS/EQUIPM ENT ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS SOURCE TO PERMIT STANDARDIZATION (Attach memorandum describing basis for standardization request).

6. _______ NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY. A DETAILED EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION

FOR THIS SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN ATTACHED MEMORANDUM.

The undersigned requests that compet itive procurement be waived and that the vendor identified as the supplier of the service or materi al described in this single/sole s ource justification be authorized as a single/sole source for the service or material.
__________Department Head: ___________________________ Department: _____________ Purchasing Department

APPROVED

APPROVED WITH CONDITION/S

DISAPPROVE
Comments:
$5,000 - $50,000
APPROVED BY PURCHASING MANAGER: ________________________ ____Date: __________ $50,000 – 100,000
APPROVED BY CITY MANAGER: ____________________________Date: __________ $100,000 AND OVER
See comments above by Purchasing Division, attach to Council Request CITY COUNCIL ACTION: ____________________________________________Date: ___________ Will review Single Source Justification in three years to verify the justification is still applicable and if needed will conduct a competitive bid process to solidify the requirement justification for the Single Source.
sdfsdf
✔
Public Works

Page 46 ends

Page 1 of 1 ends

ASSI Security has been the provider of all access controls and related maintenance for over 25 years servicing all City and Fire District facilities.

The City and Fire District’s existing security access control systems are designed to integrate seamlessly with ASSI Security’s maintenance protocols and software. By working exclusively with ASSI Security, the City and Fire District can ensure compatibility and security between hardware, software, and firmware components. This compatibility streamlines maintenance processes, reduces downtime, and enhances the overall system performance. Additionally, ASSI Security continues to provide prompt and efficient support services to any maintenance related problem, thus minimizing disruptions to the City and Fire District’s operations and ensuring the continuous functionality of the access control systems.

Originally installed in the late 1990s, the existing system includes card readers, control panels, computer software, and card keys. With an average lifespan of 20 years, the system has been in use well beyond its expected duration. Last year , City Hall experienced a critical failure where all card readers ceased functioning. The age of the system made it nearly impossible to resolve the issue promptly. ASSI Security's assessment revealed that the system ha d surpassed its expected lifespan and is now obsolete. Therefore, City Council approved to upgrade the access control system at City Hall and the Stadium. This year, we are requesting the remaining City a nd Fire District facilities upgrade the access control system to prevent the risk of another significant failure.

Staff recommends contracting ASSI Security as the single source provider for the equipment and installation of an upgraded security access control system.

DATE: September 4, 2024
TO: Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager
FROM: Andy Miller, Facilities Superintendent
BY: Andrea Bauer, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: ASSI Security – Single Source for Security Access Control System Upgrade

MEMORANDUM
Public Works Services Department

Page 47 ends

DATE: September 4, 2024
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Micah Martin, Public Works Services Director Richard Favela, Streets Maintenance Superintendent
Timothy Baltazar, Supervising Traffic Systems Specialist Lindsay McElwain, Management Analyst III
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve a Single-Source Procurement of Traffic Signal Cabinets, Controllers, and Related Equipment from Econolite Control Products of Anaheim, California, in an Amount Not to Exceed $330,830 for Fiscal Year 2024/25. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve the single-source purchase of traffic signal cabinets, controllers, and related equipment from Econolite Control Products of Anaheim, California, in an amount not to exceed $330,830 for Fiscal Year (FY) 2024/25.

BACKGROUND:

The Public Works Services Department (PWSD) replaces traffic signal cabinets and controllers as needed due to traffic collisions or equipment failures. On average, PWSD replaces four cabinets and controllers annually. To ensure the City can respond to damage immediately, PWSD keeps stock of this equipment as the cabinets take several months to build.

The Engineering Services Department’s traffic signal control equipment standards are based on the Econolite Control Products platform. Most of the City’s signalized intersections and crossings use Econolite Control Products cabinets and controllers. Standardizing traffic signal control equipment improves the functionality of the traffic signal system by reducing the stock required for daily maintenance and emergency repairs. By utilizing the Econolite Control Products platform, PWSD ensures compatibility of traffic control equipment with the City’s Centracs ® Advanced Traffic Management Software.

ANALYSIS:

Approval of a single-source purchase with Econolite Control Products will allow the PWSD to replace approximately four (4) traffic signal cabinets and controllers during FY 2024/25. The purchase of four cabinets and controllers will replace the average number that is damaged each year. For staff to continue to provide immediate response for traffic signal cabinet and controller needs, staff recommends the City Council approve the single-source purchase from Econolite Control Products for $330,830 during FY 2024/25.

Page 48 ends

Page 2 ends

2 5
0 3
FISCAL IMPACT:

The Adopted FY 2024/25 Budget includes funding for Traffic Signal Cabinets and Controllers in F712-CC001-SC7002-7000 (Equip/Vehicle Replacement – Capital Outlay-Equipment) (formerly 1712001-5603) in the amount of $290,400 and F712-CC318-SC1404-6200 (Equip/Vehicle Replacement – Operations & Maintenance) (formerly 1712001-5200) in the amount of $40,430.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Single Source Justification Form (Econolite)

Page 49 ends

D:\TempFiles\Temporary Internet Files\OLK21C\Sole Source Justification Form (3).doc

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

Vendor:_
_______________________________________Date: __________________ Commodity/Service:_____________________________________________________ Estimated expendi
ture: __________________Your Name: ______________________ Extent of market search conducted:

Price Reasonableness:________
_________________________________________
Does moving forward on this product/service further obl igate the City to future similar contract actual arrangements?
DEFINITIONS:

SOLE SOURCE - A transaction with the only business entity capable of supplying or providing the goods
or services that meet the specified need.

THIS IS A SINGLE SOURCE THIS IS A SOLE SOURCE PURCHASE (check one).

1. _______ SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS FOR THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURER, THERE ARE NO REGIONAL DISTRIBUTORS. (Item no. 3 also must also be completed).

2. _______ THE PARTS/EQUIPM ENT ARE NOT INTERCHANGEABLE WITH SIMILAR PARTS OF ANOTHER MANUFACTURER. (Explain in separate memorandum).

Econolite Control Products
5/16/2023
Traffic Signal Cabinets, Controllers, and related equipment $310,000.00
Timothy Baltazar
Engineering Department standard for traffic signal
cabinets, controllers, and related equipment
Yes
No
✔
✔
DocuSign Envelope ID: 95A07E9C-C7F7-4CC5-8D51-38C84907581F ATTACHMENT 1

Page 50 ends

Single/Sole Source Justification Form

Page 2 ends

D:\TempFiles\Temporary Internet Files\OLK21C\Sole Source Justification Form (3).doc 1/18/07

3. _______ THIS IS THE ONLY KNOWN ITEM OR SERVICE THAT WILL MEET THE

SPECIALIZED NEEDS OF THIS DEPARTMENT OR PERFORM THE INTENDED FUNCTION. (
Attach memorandum with details of specialized function or application).

5. _______ THE PARTS/EQUIPM ENT ARE REQUIRED FROM THIS SOURCE TO PERMIT STANDARDIZATION (Attach memorandum describing basis for standardization request).

6. _______ NONE OF THE ABOVE APPLY. A DETAILED EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION

FOR THIS SINGLE/SOLE SOURCE REQUEST IS CONTAINED IN ATTACHED MEMORANDUM.

APPROVED

APPROVED WITH CONDITION/S

6/13/2023 | 9:36 AM PDT

Page 51 ends

Page 1 of 1 ends

The Public Works Services Department (PWSD) is requesting a single source purchase of traffic signal cabinets, controllers, and related equipment from Econolite Control Products (Econolite) of Anaheim, California. PWSD purchases traffic signal cabinets and controllers to replace equipment damaged by traffic collisions or equipment failures. PWSD retains stock of this equipment so staff may respond immediately in the event of damage, as the cabinets can require three or more months to build.

The Engineering Services Department’s established standards for traffic signal control equipment is on the Econolite platform. Standardization of traffic signal control equipment improves functionality of the traffic signal system by limiting the stock required on- hand for daily maintenance and emergency repairs. By utilizing the Econolite platform, PWSD ensures compatibility of traffic control equipment with the City’s Centracs® Advanced Traffic Management Software.

Approval of a single-source agreement to purchase traffic signal cabinets, controllers, and related equipment from Econolite will ensure purchases meet City standards, are compatible with existing equipment and software, reduce staff inefficiency, and responsibly use taxpayer dollars.

DATE: May 16, 2023
TO: Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager
FROM: Richard Favela, Streets Maintenance Superintendent BY: Lindsay McElwain, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT: Single-Source Justification for Traffic Signal Cabinets, Controllers, and Related Equipment

MEMORANDUM
(Public Works Services Department)
DocuSign Envelope ID: 95A07E9C-C7F7-4CC5-8D51-38C84907581F

Page 52 ends

To: City of Rancho Cucamonga
From: Corey Kelly
Date: 5-8-23
Re: Sole Source

To whom it may concern,

This letter is to verify that Econolite located at 1250 N. Tustin Ave., Anaheim, California 92807 is the sole developer, provider or manufacturer of any and all, “Econolite” and “Safetran” products in the state of California.

This would include:

1. Plug-N-Go Cabinets and Hardwire: TS1 and TS2

2. Controllers: Cobalt® and Safetran 2070®. This also includes any products or licensing that would be associated with Econolite proprietary products. Example: ASC3® or EOS® software upgrades can only be purchased through Econolite as the software is developed, registered, and licensed for use only by Econolite.

3. System software: Centracs®, Centracs MOE®, Centracs SPM®. Example: Centracs® software upgrades can only be purchased through Econolite as the software is developed, registered, and licensed for use only by Econolite.

4. Autoscope® video detection: ENCORE®, Rack Vision Terra® and Vision® are registered trademarks of Image Sensing Systems. Econolite is the sole distributor of Autoscope® products in the United States.

5. Econolite Blue Series Cabinets.

6. In-ground wireless detection: Econolite-branded AccuSense® sensors, peripherals, and software.

7. Econolite Signals and Display Products

8. Econolite branded BIU’s, Load Switches, Power Supplies, Zinc Blue UPS and any other products with the Econolite® name.

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact me at (714) 273-4912.

We appreciate the opportunity for your business!

Thank You,

Corey Kelly
Econolite

DocuSign Envelope ID: 95A07E9C-C7F7-4CC5-8D51-38C84907581F

Page 53 ends

DATE: September 4, 2024
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Shelly Munson, Director of Innovation & Technology Lilyan Villarreal, Deputy Director of Innovation & Technology Tanya Trieu-Bui, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve an Agreement for Backup Cloud Services from Amazon Web Services, Inc. Not to Exceed the Amount of $137,000. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve an agreement for backup cloud services from Amazon Web Services, Inc. (AWS) not to exceed the adopted budget amount of $137,000.

BACKGROUND:

In 2019, the City implemented Amazon AWS cloud backup storage services in combination with iLand, and Veeam as a 3-tiered backup solution. Utilizing cloud backups allowed the City to migrate from data tape cartridges to direct backup into a cloud storage environment, automating the data transfer process and eliminating the need and expense to store physical cartridges off-site for safekeeping and recovery. Utilizing a cloud-based backup and recovery system also allows for additional recovery scenarios, including the ability to restore critical systems directly from virtual machines in the cloud environment should the need arise.

ANALYSIS:

AWS, Inc. provides a secure hosting infrastructure to store the data that is backup by the City’s iLand and Veeam platform and allows for an additional layer of protection for data by creating a redundant copy stored offsite. AWS, Inc. is an Advance Technology Partner with AWS Storage Competency status and ensures complete compatibility with the City’s current data backup system. AWS, Inc. meets compliance with all applicable International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and Systems and Organization Controls (SOC) standards relating to cloud data centers and has a proven track record of customer service and partnership. Staff recommends awarding a single source agreement to AWS, Inc. based on their references with Veeam, Inc., compatibility with the City’s current backup systems, and unique features offered as part of their services. Based on an analysis of the rate of growth of the City’s data, staff recommends an approval with AWS, Inc. not to exceed $137,000 per year.

Page 54 ends

Page 2 ends

2 5
0 4
FISCAL IMPACT:

The estimated cost for the continued use of AWS, Inc. was included in the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Adopted Budget and therefore no additional funds are requested.

Fiscal Year 2024/25 Adopted Budget:

General Fund F001-CC209-SC2107 Contract Services $137,000 COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses City Council’s Core Value of intentionally embracing and anticipating our future.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – AWS, Inc. Cloud Backup Quote
Attachment 2 – AWS, Inc. Single Source Justification Form and Memo

Page 55 ends

1 City of Rancho Cucamonga

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Price Estimate
8/19/24

AWS Point of Contact:

Nghia Nguyen
Amazon Web Services
410 Terry Ave. North
Seattle, WA 98109-5210
206-445-7625
[email protected]

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is pleased to provide the following estimate for Michael Scott at the City of Rancho Cucamonga. Based on AWS’s current pricing and your projected requirements, the total price is estimated to be $136,599.48.

This estimate is being provided for convenience and illustrative purposes only. Actual pricing for City of Rancho Cucamonga will be based on your actual usage of AWS’s cloud services at AWS’s then-current prices. For current prices for AWS’s cloud services, please refer to the AWS website at http://aws.amazon.com. A breakdown of this price estimate can be found on our online simple monthly calculator.

Services: AWS will make available all of its standard cloud computing services including Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2), Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), Amazon CloudFront, Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS), AWS Import/Export Snowball, AWS Support, and others. Details about AWS’s cloud services are available at http://aws.amazon.com/products/. In cases where software licenses from third parties (e.g., Red Hat) are required, City of Rancho Cucamonga would be responsible for acquiring those licenses directly from the third-party vendor, including any charges for such licenses.

Instance Types, Sizes, and Regions: For Amazon EC2, AWS will provide our standard set of compute instances across all available regions and Availability Zones as outlined on our website at http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/. At a minimum, AWS will provide access to instances in our current regions including US East (Northern Virginia), US West (Oregon), US West (Northern California), EU (Ireland), South America (Sao Paulo), Asia Pacific (Tokyo), Asia Pacific (Sydney), and Asia Pacific (Singapore). As other regions and Availability Zones come online, City of Rancho Cucamonga will have the ability to access and use those regions and instance configurations.

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 56 ends

2 City of Rancho Cucamonga is free to use different instance types and regions to support the tasks outlined for the opportunity. Note that different instance types and regions have different price points as outlined on our website at http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/#pricing. In addition to Amazon EC2 usage, AWS will bill City of Rancho Cucamonga for the use of any other AWS’s cloud services (e.g., Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, Amazon Virtual Private Cloud [Amazon VPC]) as per our established pricing found at https://aws.amazon.com/pricing/services/.

Billing/Reporting: AWS will bill City of Rancho Cucamonga for its actual usage of all services used in any given month as per our established pricing at the time of purchase. Please refer to the following link for specific prices for each service and the various configurations and pricing plans: https://aws.amazon.com/pricing/services/. AWS will work with City of Rancho Cucamonga to enable invoicing and consolidated billing across the AWS accounts that will be allocated to this opportunity. Details can be found at http://aws.amazon.com/account. City of Rancho Cucamonga is eligible for invoice billing and AWS will send monthly invoices to the AWS account owners as determined by City of Rancho Cucamonga.

Price Estimate: $136,599.48 for one year of AWS services

Note that the quote provided has been built to meet the requirements as stated by City of Rancho Cucamonga. All system specifications and cost estimations do not necessarily meet AWS best practices for high availability, performance, and the cost-effective elastic model to build and host multi-tier applications on AWS. More information on hosting web applications on AWS and optimal architectures—ones that use cloud best practices, web application hosting best practices, and fault-tolerant applications—is available online and would help inform City of Rancho Cucamonga on how to obtain best value with more robust and scalable web servers and applications. We welcome the opportunity to speak with City of Rancho Cucamonga further about Amazon EC2 Reserve Instances and other potential architectures to optimize its needs.

Please contact Nghia Nguyen with any additional questions or comments regarding AWS’s cloud services.

Page 57 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

Page 58 ends

Page 59 ends

Page 1 of 1 ends

In order to ensure continuity of operations, it is recommended that the City enter into a single source professional services agreement with Amazon Web Services, Inc. to acquire hosted backup storage for our Veeam backup environment. Staff recommends awarding a single source agreement to
Amazon Web Services, Inc. based on their
references with Veeam, Inc. and unique features offered as part of their services, and on an analysis of the rate of growth of the City’s data.

CC:

DATE: August 21, 2024
TO: Ruth Cain, Procurement Manager
FROM: Shelly Munson, DoIT Director
BY: Tanya Trieu-Bui, Management Analyst I
SUBJECT: Single Source Justification – Amazon Web Services, Inc. Cloud Storage

MEMORANDUM
Innovation & Technology

Page 60 ends

2 5
2 1
DATE:

TO:

FROM:

INITIATED BY:

SUBJECT:

September 4, 2024
Mayor and Members of the City Council
John R. Gillison, City Manager
Robert Neiuber, Senior Human Resources Director
Consideration to Approve an Amendment to a Special Services Agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a Professional Law Corporation. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve an amendment to a special services agreement between the City of Rancho Cucamonga and Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, a professional law corporation.

BACKGROUND:

The law firm, Liebert Cassidy Whitmore (LCW), is a highly respected state-wide authority on public sector labor and employment law. LCW provides the City with specialized legal services including consulting, representational, and legal services in the areas of labor relations and employment law.

The City has an existing contract with Liebert Cassidy Whitmore that was approved by City Council in 2007. This contract was amended in 2019, renewed in 2021, and amended again in 2023. The amended agreements include updated terms and conditions and an adjustment to billing rates and fees. The last amendment included a rate increase of approximately 5% to 9% per hour.

ANALYSIS:

LCW recently proposed an updated agreement adjusting the range of hourly rates. The attached agreement reflects the updated terms and conditions, including an adjustment to the billing rates and fees. The rates will increase by approximately 3.6% to 4.6% for attorneys and 20.76% for “E Discovery Specialists.”
LCW continues to be a viable labor and employment law resource and service provider for the City.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adjustments to the billing rates and fees will result in an increase of approximately $4,500 for Fiscal Year 2024/25.

COUNCIL MISSION/ VISION/ VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the core value of working together cooperatively and respectfully with each other, staff, and all stakeholders.

Page 61 ends

2 5
2 1
ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Professional Services Agreement Amendment Attachment 2 - Liebert Cassidy Whitmore Fee Schedule

Page 2 ends

Page 62 ends

AMENDMENT NO. 2
to
Professional Services Agreement (CO #2021-122)
between
Liebert Cassidy Whitmore (hereinafter "Consultant")
and
City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the "City")

This Amendment No. 2 will serve to amend the Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), CO# 2021-122, to incorporate the following:

Updated Fee Schedule (see attached)

All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement CO#2021-122, will remain in full effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature by both parties and on the date indicated below. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than March 23, 2023. The City will process both copies for signature and provide LCW with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment.

Liebert Cassidy Whitmore (LCW)

By: _____________________________
Name Date

Title

By: _____________________________
Name Date

Title
(two signatures required if corporation)
City of Rancho Cucamonga

By:

Name Date

__________________________________
Title

By: _
Name Date

Title

ATTACHMENT 1

Page 63 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

LIEBERT CASSIDY WHITMORE

FEE SCHEDULE

Partners $430.00
Senior Counsel $360.00
Associates $270.00 - $340.00
Labor Relations/Human Resources Consultant

$280.00
Classification & Compensation Consultant

$210.00
Paralegals $150.00
E-Discovery Specialists $175.00
Law Clerks $150.00 - $185.00

Page 64 ends

DATE: September 4, 2024
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena Perez, Principal Engineer
Sean McPherson, Principal Planner
SUBJECT: Consideration to Determine the Almond Street Extension Project is Categorically Exempt Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15168 – Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Section 15301 – Existing Facilities, and Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council determine the Almond Street Extension Project is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15168 – Program EIR, Section 15301 – Existing Facilities, and Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures.

BACKGROUND:

The City’s General Plan identified the need for an additional east-west street connection north of State Route (SR) – 210 in the northwestern portion of the City to address circulation issues and serve as an evacuation route in the event of an emergency. The Almond Street Extension Project (Project) was developed to resolve these issues. The Project will connect the existing eastern and western portions of Almond Street, between Carnelian Street and Via Verde Street, by constructing 900 feet of new local roadway with one (1) lane in each direction however, the design of the Project has not been completed. A public meeting will be held later this year to discuss the Project in more detail with residents who live or own property within proximity to the Project.

Design is expected to begin in early 2025 with construction planned for Fiscal Year 2025/26.

ANALYSIS:

The Project site is undeveloped and has existed as City-owned right-of-way for at least 20 years.

Based on an analysis memo prepared by First Carbon Solutions (Attachment 1), staff has determined that the Project is categorically exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities), and Section 15303 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Class 1 consists of the “operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of the lead agency’s determination.” Class 3 consists of “construction and location of limited number of new, small facilities or structures,” including but not limited to “water mains, sewage, electrical, gas, and other utility extensions including street improvements, of reasonable length to serve such construction.” See the Categorical Exemption Memorandum included with this staff report as Attachment 1.

Page 65 ends

Page 2 ends

2 5
1 8
In addition to the Project qualifying for a Categorical Exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15301 and 15303, the Project also qualifies for a statutory exemption for projects involving individual activities that are consistent with the environmental effects analyzed within the scope of a certified programmatic Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Accordingly, the Project is consistent with the General Plan EIR which was adopted by City Council on December 15, 2021, and which establishes the intent to complete this segment of Almond Street pursuant to Figure M-3 (Layered Roadway Network) found within the Mobility and Access Chapter.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The total cost of filing the Notice of Exemption with the County is $50. Funding for design of this project has been included in the approved FY 2024/25 Budget and is identified under Capital Improvement Project account number F198 CC303 SC7008 PROJ-000082 (Almond Street Extension) and is funded from the Infrastructure Fund (F198).

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This Project meets the City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high- quality public improvements.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Categorical Exemption Memorandum – Almond Street Extension Project

Page 66 ends

Memorandum
Date: August 13, 2024

To: City of Rancho Cucamonga

From: Mary Bean, Project Director, FirstCarbon Solutions

Subject: Categorical Exemption Memorandum for the Proposed Almond Street Extension Project in the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Rancho Cucamonga (City) is proposing the extension of Almond Street for a distance of approximately 900 feet between Carnelian Street and Via Verde Street within the northwestern portion of the City, in San Bernardino County, California (Exhibit 1) to promote public safety. The project site is surrounded by single-family residential uses to the south, east, and west and by orchards and undeveloped open space to the north (Exhibit 2). Regional access is provided by Interstate 210 (I-210) via the Carnelian Street exit, located 1.85 miles south of the project site.

Land use designations surrounding the project site include Semi-Rural Neighborhood (N) to the south, east, and west and Rural Open Space (OS) to the north (Exhibit 3). The project site is located within the Hillside Overlay zone (Exhibit 4). Zoning surrounding the project site includes Very Low Residential (VL) to the south, east, and west and Hillside Residential (HR) to the north (Exhibit 5).

The project site is currently undeveloped. The proposed Almond Street Extension Project (proposed project) would extend Almond Street from Carnelian Street and Via Verde Street, providing an additional east–west street connection north of I-210, and improving traffic circulation and public safety access in support of the goals of the General Plan. As shown in Exhibit 6, the Limits of Disturbance include a road width of 44 feet wide from curb to curb, with 11 feet of parkway at each side, and the total right-of-way width would be 66 feet wide.

Construction activities would include grading and the installation of the new road, curb, and gutter; new asphalt pavement; and a drainage culvert under the proposed road. As part of the proposed street extension, the City would construct a Reinforced Box Culvert (RBC) in accordance with California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) standards, as well as a concrete head wall to collect runoff from the north side of the proposed roadway. The western side of the proposed project would connect to an existing drainage channel in Almond Street in accordance with City standards.

Page 67 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 2 ends

The project site is currently equipped with electricity and telecommunications poles and cables, which are currently within the right-of-way. Additionally, two chain-link fences on the north side of the project site would be relocated to the City right-of-way. The proposed project would include sidewalks, streetlights, and a retaining curb. Approximately five mature trees and approximately six orange trees would be removed as part of the proposed project improvements.

Grading quantities are anticipated to be approximately 1,000 cubic yards. It is anticipated that the construction start date would occur in Fiscal Year 2025/2026.

CEQA FRAMEWORK FOR EXEMPTION
The proposed project is a candidate for a streamlined approach to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review as it qualifies for the following Categorical Exemptions:
• CEQA Guidelines Exemption Section 15168: is a streamlining process establishing a statutory exemption for projects involving individual activities that are consistent with the environmental effects analyzed within the scope of a certified programmatic Environmental Impact Report (EIR). • CEQA Guidelines Exemption Section 15301(c) (Class 1): Existing highways and streets, sidewalks, gutters, bicycle and pedestrian trails, and similar facilities (this includes road grading for the purpose of public safety).
• CEQA Guidelines Exemption Section 15303(d) (Class 3): New construction or conversion of small structures applies to “construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures,” including but not limited to “water mains, sewage, electrical, gas, and other utility extensions including street improvements, of reasonable length to serve such construction.”

Each of the above exemptions provides a separate and independent basis to comply with CEQA.

Project Eligibility
• CEQA Guidelines Exemption for consistency with Section 15168: Under Section 15168, a lead agency can approve a later action as being within the scope of a certified program EIR and, “no new environmental document would be required,” thus exempting later consistent activities from further review.
• CEQA Guidelines Exemption Section 15301(c) (Class 1): The proposed project qualifies for a Section 15101(c) Categorical Exemption because it involves a negligible extension of an existing street for purposes of public safety. It does not create additional automobile lanes. • CEQA Guidelines Exemption Section 15303(d) (Class 3): Lastly, the proposed project involves the construction of a small street improvement.

Page 68 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 3 ends

Criteria for Section 15300.2 Exceptions to an Exemption In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 lists exceptions that must be evaluated for any project seeking an exemption. These exceptions are as follows:
a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the proposed project is to be located—a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply in all instances except where the proposed project may impact an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, State, or local agencies.
b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type, in the same place, and over time is significant. c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances.
d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a State Scenic Highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR.
e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historic resource.

The following evaluates the proposed project’s eligibility for exemption under Sections 15168, 15101(c), and 15303(d). The availability of potential exceptions to CEQA’s Categorical Exemptions is also addressed and is supported by substantial evidence in the record.

Page 69 ends

!
·|}þ83
·|}þ91
·|}þ57
·|}þ241
·|}þ60
!"#$5
%&'(10
OrangeCounty
RiversideCounty
%&'(15
%&'(15
%&'(15
·|}þ210
·|}þ210
Los Angeles County
San Bernardino County
·|}þ91
%&'(15
·|}þ71
Silverwood
Lake
San Gabriel
Reservoir
Morris
Reservoir
Prado Flood
Control Basin
Santiago Reservoir
Lake Mathews
Angeles
National
Forest
San Bernardino
National Forest
Cleveland
National
Forest
Glendora
Rancho
Cucamonga
RialtoSan Dimas
FontanaCovina
Pomona ColtonOntario
Walnut
Chino
Riverside
Norco
Yorba LindaFullerton
Anaheim
Orange
WoodcrestCorona
Chino Hills
Upland
Claremont
Montclair
Wrightwood
Exhibit 1
Regional Location Map
!
Text
Project Site
Source: Census 2000 Data, The California Spatial Information Library (CaSIL).

I
00180046 " 03/2023 | 1_regional.mxd Project Site
5 0 52.5
Miles
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ALMOND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM Legend
City of Rancho Cucamonga

Page 70 ends

00180046 " 03/2023 | 2_local_vicinity_map.mxd Exhibit 2
Local Vicinity Map
Source: Bing Aerial Imagery. City of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ALMOND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM I
Legend
Almond Street Extension (66ft wide)
1,000 0 1,000500
Feet

Page 71 ends

00180046 " 03/2023 | 3_GPLU.mxd Exhibit 3
General Plan Land Use Map
Source: Bing Aerial Imagery. City of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ALMOND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM I
Legend
Almond Street Extension (66ft wide)
General Plan Land Use
N: Semi-rural Neighborhood
OS-F: General Open Space and Facilities
OS: Rural Open Space
400 0 400200
Feet

Page 72 ends

00180046 " 04/2023 | 4_hillside_overlay.mxd Exhibit 4
Hillside Overlay Zone
Source: Bing Aerial Imagery. City of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ALMOND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM I
Legend
Almond Street Extension (66ft wide)
Hillside Overlay Zone
510 0 510255
Feet

Page 73 ends

00180046 " 04/2023 | 5_Zoning.mxd Exhibit 5
Zoning Map
Source: Bing Aerial Imagery. City of Rancho Cucamonga. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ALMOND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM I
Legend
Almond Street Extension (66ft wide)
Zoning Designations
FC/UC: Flood Control/Utility Corridor
HR: Hillside Residential
VL: Very Low Residential
400 0 400200
Feet

Page 74 ends

00180046 " 06/2023 | 6_Estimated Limits of Disturbance.mxd Exhibit 6
Estimated Limits of Disturbance
Source: Bing Aerial Imagery. City of Rancho Cucamonga.

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

ALMOND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT

CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM
150 0 15075
Feet
Legend
Limits of Disturbance
Temporary Encroachment Area
City of Rancho Cucamonga Parcels

Page 75 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 10 ends

CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN
The proposed project would further the goals, policies, and programs of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan (General Plan) as evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2021050261, Certified December 15, 2021). The project site was evaluated in the General Plan Update EIR. The proposed project would be consistent with and would implement the General Plan’s Circulation Goal MA-2: Access For all–A safe, efficient, accessible, and equitable transportation system that serves the mobility needs of all users; and Policy MA-2.3 Street Design–Implement innovative street and intersection designs to maximize efficiency and safety in the City. Use traffic calming tools to assist in implementing complete street principles.

The General Plan includes policies and Standard Conditions of Approval that provide specific direction for implementing projects, such as the Almond Street Extension. The full text of applicable Standard Conditions of Approval that are referenced in the memorandum are included in Attachment A.

The proposed project’s consistency with the analysis in the General Plan Update EIR is discussed in greater detail in the sections below.

ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL EXCEPTIONS TO AN EXEMPTION
Location
This exception does not apply to the proposed project’s eligibility for exemption under Section 151301.

The proposed project does not seek an exemption pursuant to Class 4, 5, 6, or 11; however, the proposed project does seek an exemption pursuant to Class 3. Therefore, this exception to a Categorical Exemption applies to the proposed project for purposes of establishing compliance with the Class 3 exemption only and therefore requires an analysis of the location. See also the discussion for Exception (e) below.

Cumulative Impact
As a routine street extension project, there are no unusual circumstances that would have a significant effect on the environment. Some minor ground-disturbing activities associated with the construction of the proposed project would occur, and impacts related to construction activities are detailed in Exception (c), below. Post-construction, the proposed project would not have any impacts. There would not be successive projects of the same type occurring in the same place.

Significant Effect
Because of the location and small scale of the proposed project, it would have overall negligible impacts on the environment. Nonetheless, this section provides analysis related to the proposed project’s potential construction impacts related to air quality/greenhouse gases, biological resources, asbestos, lead, and noise. Pursuant to this analysis, impacts would not be significant.

Page 76 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 11 ends

Discussions related to hazardous waste sites and historic and cultural resources are discussed in Exceptions (e) and (f), respectively.

Air Quality
The project site is located within South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) and is under the jurisdiction of South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD).

The proposed project is included as a policy improvement measure within the City’s General Plan and, as such, the implementation of the project will reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and not result in increased project operational emissions. Air quality impacts determinations made in the City’s General Plan Update EIR are presented here rather than reanalyzing the proposed project’s impact. Project specific determinations for significance are developed herein, as necessary, to demonstrate that impacts are less than significant.

The thresholds used to determine the significance of the General Plan Update’s impacts are based on SCAQMD recommended air quality thresholds which include criteria to assist in the evaluation of significant impacts for individual projects. Appendix G of the State CEQA Guidelines also provides considerations for determining the significance of a project’s impacts, in the form of initial study checklist questions.

Pollutants emitted into the ambient air by stationary and mobile sources are regulated by federal and State law, and standards are detailed in the SoCAB Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). Air pollutants for which ambient air quality standards (AAQS) have been developed are known as criteria air pollutants, including ozone (O
3), carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur dioxide, coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5), and lead. VOC and NOX are criteria pollutant precursors and go on to form secondary criteria pollutants, such as O3, through chemical and photochemical reactions in the atmosphere. Air basins are classified as attainment/nonattainment areas for particular pollutants depending on whether they meet AAQS for that pollutant. Based on the SoCAB AQMP , the SoCAB is designated nonattainment for O 3, PM2.5, PM10,
and lead (Los Angeles County only) under the California and National AAQS and nonattainment for NO2 under the California AAQS.

General Plan Update Air Quality Impacts and Measures
The General Plan Update EIR evaluates the potential for implementation of the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update to impact air quality based on the methodology recommended by the SCAQMD. The City also uses Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines to ensure that all of the CEQA topics are addressed in the EIR.

The General Plan Update EIR organizes its impact analysis around the four CEQA Air Quality checklist questions summarized below.

AQ-1 Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan?

Page 77 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 12 ends

AQ-2 Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or State ambient air quality standard?
AQ-3 Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? AQ-4 Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors or) adversely affecting a substantial number of people?

The programmatic analysis provided in the EIR does not make significance determinations regarding AQ- 2 and AQ-3 impacts on an individual project basis, given the inability to project construction parameters, duration, and intensity for future projects accurately. These are addressed in the analysis below, along with findings contained within the EIR and mitigation measures and standard conditions that apply to General Plan projects.

The Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update EIR (Workplan, Volume 1 Chapter 4) has set forth Standard Conditions of Approval 5.3-1, 5.3-2, 5.3-3, and 5.3-4 that can reduce air quality impacts for the proposed project.
1 The General Plan contains numerous measures addressing Air Quality within its Resource Conservation Element under GOAL RC-5 LOCAL AIR QUALITY. Healthy air quality for all residents. The following measure is directly applicable to the construction of the proposed project:

RC-5.10 Dust and Odor. Require new construction to include measures to minimize dust and odor during construction and operation.

Project Consistency with Air Quality Plan (AQ-1)
The proposed project would build a 0.2-mile roadway with gutter and sidewalk, which is consistent with the City’s General Plan Policy MA-2.3 and LC-1.4. Thus, development of the proposed project has been accounted for by local and regional land use planning strategies, including the SCAQMD 2022 AQMP .

Criteria pollutant and precursor emissions associated with the proposed project’s influence on regional population growth have also therefore been accounted for by the 2022 AQMP . It is further noted that the City of Rancho Cucamonga General Plan Update EIR determined that General Plan projects were consistent with the 2016 AQMP without any mitigation measures.

Project Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase of Any Criteria Pollutants (AQ-2) This impact evaluates whether an individual proposed project would cause construction-generated criteria air pollutant or precursor emissions to exceed SCAQMD’s recommended thresholds.

The General Plan Update EIR was not able to evaluate projects individually and addresses these impacts via Standard Conditions of Approval 5.3-1 through 5.3-4, which require that individual projects must

1 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2021. General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan. Draft Environmental Impact Report. Website:
https://www.cityofrc.us/GeneralPlanprocess. Accessed April 26, 2023.

Page 78 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 13 ends

apply Best Management Practices (BMPs) to ensure that emissions are below SCAQMD significance thresholds and employ feasible mitigation measures for projects with emissions above threshold values.

The SCAQMD has developed regional screening criteria that address the potential for project construction or operation to result in potentially significant air quality impacts. The screening criteria provide lead agencies and project applicants with a conservative indication of whether a proposed project could result in potentially significant air quality impacts. If all the screening criteria are met by a proposed project, then a detailed air quality assessment is not necessary to demonstrate that air quality impacts would be less than significant.
2 Table 1 summarizes the predicted emissions from the construction of the proposed roadway extension compared to the SCAQMD regional thresholds.

As outlined in RC-5-10 and in Standard Conditions of Approval 5.3-1, 5.3-3, and 5.3-4, the proposed project would employ SCAQMD BMPs for fugitive dust control during construction activities and, to the extent feasible, would incorporate BMPs that exceed SCAQMD’s Rule 403 requirements to reduce emissions to less than applicable thresholds. Modeling of the construction activities using California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) and factoring in the identified BMPs predicts emissions levels of PM
10 and PM2.5 below SCAQMD thresholds. The modeling was performed assuming construction would start in the summer of 2024; however, if construction is delayed and occurs later than assumed, emissions would likely decrease due to improvements in technology and compliance with more stringent regulatory requirements.

Construction emissions include impacts from the off-road heavy-duty construction equipment, fugitive dust from material movement and from the entrainment of roadway dust from vehicles, and off-gassing of volatile compounds from asphalt paving. Land clearing includes 100 cubic yards of export of debris.

Grading quantities are estimated as 1,000 cubic yards, assumed as exported soil. Road construction would import 1,000 cubic yards of material for sidewalk, curb, gutter, and culvert (for stormwater drainage). Road paving would import approximately 1700 tons of asphalt to cover the 0.2 mile of road, which would result in seven vendor trucks trips per day. Construction worker vehicle trips are also included in the emission modeling.

Using information specific to the proposed project, modeled emissions were determined and shown in Table 1.

2 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 1993. CEQA Handbook. Available at SCAQMD, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 .

Page 79 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 14 ends

Table 1: Regional Construction Emissions by Construction Activity Construction Activity
Regional Pollutant Emissions (pounds per day)1
VOC NOX CO SOX PM10 (Total) PM2.5 (Total)
Grubbing and Land Clearing (5 days) 0.47 4.20 4.22 0.01 1.37 0.42 Grading and Excavation (15 days) 1.26 10.37 12.69 0.02 1.60 0.64 Road Construction (25 days) 2.78 26.87 25.31 0.06 4.19 1.39 Paving (10 days) 0.99 8.62 11.42 0.02 0.83 0.48
Maximum Daily Emissions 2.78 26.87 25.31 0.06 4.19 1.39 SCAQMD Significance Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Exceed Threshold? No No No No No No
Notes:

CO = carbon monoxide
NOX = nitrogen oxides
PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District
SOX = sulfur oxide
Source: CalEEMod Output (Attachment B)

Conservative modeling shows that emissions from the buildout of the proposed project would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for construction-related criteria pollutant and precursors. Pollutant emissions were estimated using CalEEMod Version 2022.1. Detailed modeling assumptions and methodology are contained in Attachment B. As shown in Table 1, construction of the proposed project would not result in exceedances of SCAQMD significance thresholds.

The proposed project would not generate construction-related criteria pollutant or precursor emissions in excess of SCAQMD thresholds of significance. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant, and this impact would be less than significant.

Expose Sensitive Receptors to Substantial Pollutant Concentrations (AQ-3) Criteria Pollutant Exposure
The SCAQMD has developed localized significance thresholds (LSTs) in addition to the regional thresholds to serve as a screening method for identifying localized impacts of criteria pollutants. The LST methodology was developed to analyze localized impacts associated with project-level development.

The LSTs depend on the location of the project, overall size of the project site, and distance of existing sensitive receptors from the project site. The SCAQMD recommends the use of LSTs for projects that are 5 acres or less in size.

Page 80 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 15 ends

Modeling of emissions was conducted using CalEEMod Version 2022.1.1.11. Compliance with SCAQMD Rule 403, requiring best practices for dust control, is included in construction emission estimates. The SCAQMD’s localized assessment methodology specifically limits emissions considered to those generated from on-site activities. Since the proposed project does include increased local traffic trips from material delivery and construction workers, vehicle emissions were included with a trip length of 0.6 mile. The proposed project is located within Source Receptor Area (SRA) 32, Northwest San Bernadino Valley,3 and the nearest sensitive receptors are residences immediately to the south within 5 meters. The total area of disturbance/construction at any one time would be less than one acre. Therefore, the selected LSTs are for a 1-acre site in SRA 32 with receptors within 25 meters. Further modeling assumptions and details can be found in Attachment B along with modeling outputs. Results of the LST analysis are shown in Table 2 below.

Table 2: Construction Localized Significance Analysis
Emission Source
Pollutants
(Maximum Pounds per Day)
NOX CO PM10 PM2.5
Grubbing and Land Clearing (5 days) 3.78 3.66 0.93 0.31 Grading and Excavation (15 days) 9.73 12.01 1.02 0.49
Road Construction (25 days) 26.43 24.75 3.74 1.28
Paving (10 days) 8.27 11.02 0.41 0.37
Daily Maximum Total 26.43 24.75 3.74 1.28
SCAQMD Localized Significance Thresholds SRA 32, 1 acre site, within 25 meters
118 863 5 4
Emissions Exceed Thresholds? No No No No
Notes:

CO = carbon monoxide
NOX = nitrogen oxides
PM10 = particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter PM2.5 = particulate matter less than 2.5 microns in diameter SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District
SRA = Source Receptor Area
Source of Table: CalEEMOD Output (Attachment B)

As shown above, the proposed project’s construction emissions would not exceed any LSTs for localized criteria pollutants.

3 South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2008. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology.

Page 81 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 16 ends

Toxic Air Contaminant Exposure
The primary toxic air contaminant (TAC) that would be generated by construction of the proposed project is diesel particulate matter, which would be released from the exhaust of diesel-powered construction vehicles and equipment.

The General Plan EIR addresses the exposure of sensitive receptors to TAC from construction of projects in the EIR and finds that TAC impacts from construction activities would not result in significant impacts.

Studies show that diesel PM is highly dispersive and that concentrations of diesel PM decline with distance from the source (Zhu et al. 2002a). These studies illustrate that receptors must be near emission sources for a long period to experience exposure at concentrations of concern. Given the temporary and intermittent nature of construction activities likely to occur within specific locations in the Plan Area (i.e., construction is not likely to occur in any one part of the Plan Area for an extended time), the dose of diesel PM that any one receptor is exposed to would be limited. Therefore, considering the relatively short duration of diesel PM-emitting construction activity at any one location of the Plan Area, and the highly dispersive properties of diesel PM, sensitive receptors would not be exposed to substantial concentrations of construction-related TAC emissions.

Following the rationale and conclusion in the General Plan EIR findings, TAC emissions from the proposed project’s construction activities are expected to result in less than significant health risk impacts.

Result in Other Emissions, Such as Odors (AQ-4)
Policy RC-5.10 of the General Plan would require new construction to include measures to minimize dust and odor during construction and operation. In addition, several action items in the General Plan Work Plan (see Volume 4: Chapter 1 of General Plan Update) are aimed at reducing emissions from construction and operational activities in the City:

The General Plan Update EIR found odor impacts to be less than significant. The following summarizes impacts and conclusions with respect to the potential for construction odor impacts of projects on sensitive receptors.

Minor odors from the use of heavy-duty diesel-powered equipment and the laying of asphalt during construction activities would be intermittent and temporary. Because of the characteristics of diesel exhaust emissions, odors generated from the use of heavy- duty diesel-powered equipment would dissipate rapidly within 150 meters (492 feet) (Zhu et al. 2002a, 2002b). While construction would occur intermittently through the General Plan planning horizon, these types of odor-generating activities would not occur at any single location or within proximity to the same off-site receptors for an extended period of time and would not result in permanent odor sources. Therefore, construction is not anticipated to result in substantial odors.

Page 82 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 17 ends

Greenhouse Gases
The City also uses Appendix G to address the impacts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A project would normally have a significant effect on the environment if the project would:

GHG-1 Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment.

GHG-2 Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.

The proposed project implements a policy contained in the General Plan which does not generate operational emissions as it serves to improve traffic circulation by connecting streets. As such, long-term operation of the proposed project would not result in increased air pollution of GHG or have significant impact on the environment. Like the Air Quality analysis, only the emissions and impacts of construction- related emissions are considered.

The City of Rancho Cucamonga Climate Action Plan (CAP) was adopted in 2021 as a companion to the General Plan. Emissions from off-road construction equipment are less than 0.1 percent (reported as 0.0 percent in the CAP) of the City’s GHG emissions in 2018 and do not represent a significant portion of the inventory. The CAP contains one strategy related to construction-related GHG emissions that is potentially applicable to the proposed project:

Strategy 1.6 Construction Vehicle Fleets Measure(s): Adopt an ordinance or update development code that requires 50 percent of heavy-duty construction equipment and vehicles to be electric or use other zero emissions technology or fuels by 2030, and 75 percent by 2040.

It should be noted that development codes and ordinances have not been updated to implement this requirement yet.

Generate Direct and Indirect GHG Emissions and Potentially Result in a Significant Impact on the Environment
Construction of the proposed project will involve construction of 900 feet of roadway over two working months. Similar projects typically involve use of heavy-duty equipment, construction worker commute trips, material deliveries, and vendor trips. These activities would result in GHG emissions that are limited in duration and the construction of the individual project would not result in a significant impact.

Consistency with Applicable Plans, Policies, or Regulations of an Agency Adopted to Reduce the Emissions of GHGs
The City of Rancho Cucamonga CAP was adopted in December 2021 as a companion to the General Plan.

The plan sets forth numeric GHG reduction targets for the City for the years 2030 and 2040, in alignment with the Statewide target for 2030 and Statewide goal for 2050. It specifically addresses Senate Bill 32

Page 83 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 18 ends

(2016) requirements for the Statewide emissions (40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030) and Executive Orders B-30-15 (2015) and S-3-05 (2005) Statewide goals (80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050). The CAP’s environmental impacts were analyzed alongside the General Plan Update in the same EIR document.4
The City’s CAP meets the requirements of a local GHG reduction strategy which meets the criteria under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183.5(b). Projects implemented as part of the General Plan would be consistent with City’s CAP requirements and, in turn, with the State’s planning efforts and GHG Scoping Plans. The proposed project is consistent with all elements in the City’s CAP.

With respect to other plans, the proposed project is a local roadway extension and not listed in the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Therefore, there are no applicable policies from the RTP/SCS.

Thus, the proposed project would not have any significant impacts with regards to generating GHG emissions which would have a significant impact on the environment (GHG-1) and would be consistent with all applicable plans, policies, and regulations to reduce GHG emissions (GHG-2).

Biological Resources
The project site and adjacent lands contain suitable habitat that provide potential for the occurrence of special-status species and habitats, jurisdictional resources, migratory birds, and trees protected by local ordinance.

The General Plan includes uniformly applied policies and Standard Conditions of Approval that afford protection for species and provide guidance for implementing projects to evaluate the potential for habitats and species and to incorporate measures to avoid or offset potential impacts in accordance with local, State, and federal guidance. The full text of the Standard Conditions of Approval are included in Attachment A.

Standard Conditions of Approval

5.4-1 related to special-status plant and wildlife species

5.4-2 related to federally listed Threatened or Endangered species

5.4-3 related to State-listed Threatened or Endangered Species

5.4-5 related to jurisdictional resources

5.4-6 related to waters of the State

4 City of Rancho Cucamonga. 2021. General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan. Draft Environmental Impact Report. Website:
https://www.cityofrc.us/GeneralPlanprocess. Accessed April 26, 2023.

Page 84 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 19 ends

As discussed below, initial field analysis has been completed and appropriate measures are identified for implementation by the City prior to construction to ensure compliance with the City’s Standard Conditions of Approval. With implementation of these requirements, the proposed project would not have any significant impacts with regards to biological species and habitats.

Special-status Plant and Animal Species
A review of existing databases determined that a total of 104 special-status plant species have previously been recorded within 10 miles of the project site or within the nine-quadrangle search area that encompasses the project site (Appendix C). One special-status species, southern California black walnut (Juglans californica), is present on and adjacent to the project site. It was determined that the project site contains suitable habitat conditions that provide moderate or high potential for Parry’s spineflower (Chorizanthe parryi var. parryi), white-bracted spineflower (Chorizanthe xanti var. leucotheca), paniculate tarplant (Deinandra paniculata), slender-horned spineflower (Dodecahema leptoceras), Robinson’s pepper-grass (Lepidium virginicum var. robinsonii), Parish’s bush-mallow (Malacothamnus parishii), Brand’s star phacelia (Phacelia stellaris), white rabbit-tobacco (Pseudognaphalium leucocephalum), San Gabriel oak (Quercus durata var. gabrielensis), Latimer’s woodland-gilia (Saltugilia latimeri), Catalina mariposa lily (Calochortus catalinae), slender mariposa-lily (Calochortus clavatus var. gracilis), ocellated Humboldt lily (Lilium humboldtii ssp. ocellatum), and aparejo grass (Muhlenbergia utilis).

There are California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) records for 43 special-status wildlife species within 10 miles of the project site or as identified in the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Conservation (IPaC) review. One special-status species, San Diegan tiger whiptail (Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri), is present on the project site. It was determined that the project site contains suitable habitat conditions that provide moderate or high potential for Crotch’s bumble bee (Bombus crotchii), white cuckoo bee (Neolarra alba), arroyo toad (Anaxyrus californicus), western spadefoot (Spea hammondii), southern California legless lizard (Anniella stebbinsi), California glossy snake (Arizona elegans occidentalis), coast horned lizard (Phrynosoma blainvillii), coastal California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica californica), San Bernardino kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami parvus), western mastiff bat (Eumops perotis californicus), hoary bat (Lasiurus cinereus), San Diego desert woodrat (Neotoma lepida intermedia), and Los Angeles pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris brevinasus).

Species that are present on-site or that have a moderate or high potential to occur are discussed in Attachment C.

In accordance with Standard Condition of Approval 5.4-1, focused surveys and/or habitat assessments for special-status species, including rare plants, Crotch’s bumblebee and white cuckoo bee, arroyo toad, other special-status amphibians and reptiles, coastal California gnatcatcher, San Bernardino kangaroo rat, special-status bats, and other special-status mammals, shall be conducted prior to construction activities to determine presence or absence. As stated in Standard Condition 5.4-1, if special-status species or their habitats are found, appropriate compensation or offsets would be required in coordination with the City. If State or federally listed species are found, implementation of Standard Conditions of Approval

Page 85 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 20 ends

5.4-2 and 5.4-3 would be required to obtain take permissions. Implementation of Standard Conditions of Approval 5.4-1, 5.4-2, and/or 5.4-3, as applicable, would reduce potential impacts to special-status species to a less than significant level.

Sensitive Natural Vegetation Community: California Walnut Groves A total of 12 Southern California black walnut trees were recorded on or adjacent to the project site. Two clusters of these trees are located on and directly adjacent to the project site (Exhibit 7). Southern California black walnut is designated by the California Native Plant Society as a California Rare Plant Rank

4.2 species. Rank 4 plants do not clearly meet CEQA standards and thresholds for impact considerations; however, the occurrence of these trees in groves on the project site meets the definition of California walnut groves (Juglans californica Forest and Woodland Alliance), a sensitive natural vegetation community (Sensitive Natural Community ID No. 72.100.03; Juglans californica/annual herbaceous; State Rarity Rank: S3.2) that meets thresholds for impact considerations under CEQA.

Page 86 ends

00180046 " 07/2023 | 7_tree_canopy_extents.mxd Exhibit 7
Tree Canopy Extents
Source: Bing Aerial Imagery. City of Rancho Cucamonga.

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

ALMOND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT

CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM
160 0 16080
Feet
I
Legend
Study Area15.42 acres
Limits of Disturbance1.75 acres
Temporary Encroachment Area2074 sq ft Drainage/Dry Wash
Vegetation Communities/Land Cover Types Study Area LOD Temp Area Bare 0.34 acre 0.25 acre 25 sq ft Coastal Sage Scrub 0.58 acre 0.02 acre 135 sq ft Developed 10.16 acres 0.67 acre 0.00 Eucalyptus Windrow 0.25 acre 0.05 acre 0.00 Orchard 3.21 acre 0.38 acre 0.00 Ruderal 0.61 acre 0.24 acre 0.00 Southern California Black Walnut Woodland 0.27 acre 0.14 acre 1914 sq ft Legend
Tree Canopy Extents
Native Trees
BW: southern California black walnut EL: blue elderberry tree
OT: coast live oak
WS: western sycamore
Non-native Trees
G: lemon-scented gum
MP: Monterrey pine

Page 87 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 22 ends

This sensitive natural community occurs in riparian corridors and adjacent hillsides and has been eliminated throughout much of Southern California due to urban development, type conversion, and agricultural clearing. The two clusters on the project site comprise a remnant California walnut grove that is in and adjacent to an unnamed drainage that originates on the mountainside downslope from Cucamonga Peak and north of the project site. Much of this area has been developed with residential and citrus orchards, but remnants of native communities occur on and adjacent to the project alignment. The California walnut groves account for 0.14 acre within the Limits of Disturbance and an additional 0.04 acre of this community is located within the Temporary Encroachment Area.

Construction of the project site would result in permanent and temporary impacts to this community.

General Plan Standard Conditions of Approval 5.4-2 and 5.4-3 require that impacts to habitat shall be offset at a ratio no less than one to one (one acre restored for every acre impacted); thus, potential impacts to sensitive natural communities would be reduced to a less than significant level.

Four conservation areas currently exist in the City vicinity and are already protected from development by the recordation of conservation deed restrictions as well as conservation management plans:
• 760-acre North Etiwanda Preserve
• 137-acre San Sevaine Spreading Grounds
• 880-acre US Forest Service Conservation Area
• 35-acre conservation area purchased as mitigation and set aside through a conservation easement to the San Bernardino County CSA 70 (10/2003)

These areas are intended to protect alluvial fan sage scrub, sycamore alluvial woodland, California walnut woodland, and freshwater marsh. Those that protect and manage California walnut woodlands would serve as appropriate off-site compensation for the impacts to the California walnut woodlands on and adjacent to the project site.

State or Federally Protected Wetlands
There are two unnamed natural drainages, Drainages 1 and 2, originating north of the project site that flow through the project site (Exhibits 8, 8A, and 8B). These features originate on the mountainside downslope from Cucamonga Peak and within city limits they are flanked by natural vegetation communities both north and south of the project site. Drainage 1 continues to the south of the project site as a channelized drain, where water is conveyed downstream and likely making a connection with Deer Creek. Drainage 2 flows into a gutter along Almond Street and heads west out of the project study area. These features could potentially be considered jurisdictional by the regulatory agencies; however, with the recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Sackett v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [Sackett], it is expected that these ephemeral streams will not be regulated under Section 404 of the federal Clean Water Act. Development of the proposed project could result in permanent and temporary impacts to these potentially jurisdictional features. In accordance with Standard Condition of Approval 5.4-5, a jurisdictional delineation was completed in August 2023 to determine whether the feature is jurisdictional.

Page 88 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 23 ends

The jurisdictional delineation confirmed that the proposed project would result in temporary impact to

0.03 acre and 77 linear feet of United States Army Crop of Engineers (USACE)/Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) jurisdiction [no wetlands] and 0.034 acre and 77 linear feet of California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) jurisdiction [0.003 acre and 15 linear feet of this CDFW total is considered as riparian streambed].

The jurisdictional delineation also confirmed that the proposed project would result in permanent impact to 0.139 acre and 66 linear feet of USACE/RWQCB jurisdiction [no wetlands] and 0.155 acre and 66 linear feet of CDFW jurisdiction [0.016 acre and 47 linear feet of this CDFW total is considered as riparian streambed]. Exhibits 9A and 9B depict temporary and permanent impacts to RWQCB and CDFW jurisdiction.

Based on the recent Sackett Decision, it is not expected that regulatory approvals would be required by USACE due to the ephemeral nature of the on-site streambeds. It is expected that both the RWQCB and the CDFW will determine that these features are jurisdictional under Section 13260 of the California Water Code and Section 1602 of the State of California Fish and Game Code respectively; therefore, the City would be required to implement Standard Condition of Approval 5.4-6, obtaining permits pursuant to Section 13260 of the California Water Code [the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act], and Section 1602 of the California Fish and Game Code for project impacts to the drainage feature. The permits could require that avoidance and minimization measures be implemented and that on-site and/or off-site conservation areas be implemented to offset project impacts.

There are no vernal pools or features indicative of the historic presence of vernal pools on the project site or within 500 feet. Because there are no wetlands or vernal pools on or adjacent to the project site, the proposed project would have no impact related to effects on State or federally protected wetlands or vernal pools.

Movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery sites The majority of the project site is undeveloped but is surrounded by residential development and streets to the west, east, and south that limit wildlife movement through the project site. The unnamed drainage that crosses the project site likely functions as a wildlife corridor north of the project site, but the channelized character of the drainage south of the project site prevents it from facilitating wildlife movements through or south of the project site. The project site itself does not serve as a wildlife movement corridor.

Page 89 ends

00180046 • 09/2023 | 8_Jurisdictional Delineation Overview.cdr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

ALMOND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT

CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM
Exhibit 8
Jurisdictional Delineation Overview
Source: South Environmental, 2023.

Page 90 ends

00180046 • 09/2023 | 8a_Jurisdictional Delineation-Drainage 1.cdr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

ALMOND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT

CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM
Exhibit 8a
Jurisdictional Delineation - Drainage 1
Source: South Environmental, 2023.

Page 91 ends

00180046 • 09/2023 | 8b_Jurisdictional Delineation-Drainage 2.cdr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

ALMOND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT

CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM
Exhibit 8b
Jurisdictional Delineation - Drainage 2
Source: South Environmental, 2023.

Page 92 ends

00180046 • 09/2023 | 9a_Jurisdictional Delineation Impact Map-Drainage 1.cdr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

ALMOND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT

CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM
Exhibit 9a
Jurisdictional Delineation Impact Map - Drainage 1
Source: South Environmental, 2023.

Page 93 ends

00180046 • 09/2023 | 9b_Jurisdictional Delineation Impact Map-Drainage 2.cdr CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

ALMOND STREET EXTENSION PROJECT

CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION MEMORANDUM
Exhibit 9b
Jurisdictional Delineation Impact Map - Drainage 2
Source: South Environmental, 2023.

Page 94 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 29 ends

The project site and areas within 500 feet contain trees, vegetation, and other substrates and platforms that could potentially provide nesting habitat to native avian species. It may be possible that construction activities associated with the project could disturb native nesting birds during the peak nesting season (between March 15 and September 15). Construction-related impacts to nesting birds would be considered a violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Codes that protect nesting birds. Implementation of Standard Condition of Approval 5.4-4, which includes pre-construction surveys for nesting birds and establishment of nest protection buffers to avoid disturbing active nests if project construction activities that are initiated during the peak avian nesting season (between March 15 and September 15), would reduce the potential impacts to nesting birds to a less than significant level.

Tree preservation policy or ordinance
The City Tree Preservation Ordinance (Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code [RCMC] 17.80) protects all “heritage trees” that meet at least one of the following criteria: (1) All Eucalyptus windrows; or (2) All woody plants in excess of 30 feet in height and having a single trunk diameter of 20 inches or more, as measured four and a half feet (4.5’) from ground level; or (3) Multi-trunk tree(s) having a total diameter of 30 inches or more, as measured 24 inches from ground level; or (4) A strand of trees the nature of which makes each dependent upon the others for survival; or (5) Any other tree as may be deemed historically or culturally significant by the Planning Director because of size, condition, location, or aesthetic qualities.

Removal or relocation of a heritage tree, including those on private property, requires a permit from the Planning Department. According to the Tree Preservation Ordinance, heritage trees may be pruned, but improper pruning, such as “topping,” can damage or kill trees and should be avoided.

Several trees that may qualify as heritage trees were documented on the project site, as depicted in Exhibit 7 and detailed in Table 3 There are a total of 17 trees on the project site, including eight southern California black walnut trees, two western sycamore trees, four coast live oak trees, two lemon-scented gum trees, and one blue elderberry. An additional 10 trees are located off-site, with their canopies overlapping the project boundary. Six trees on-site qualify as heritage trees, including four southern California black walnut trees, two western sycamore trees, and one coast live oak tree. Fourteen trees on-site or directly adjacent to the project do not qualify as heritage trees because either (1) their trunk diameters were less than 20 inches (or cumulatively 30 for multi-trunk trees), or (2) they had been previously cut and were resprouting. For those trees on-site that qualify as heritage trees, a Tree Removal Permit would be required if the project will remove them. Project compliance with the City Tree Preservation Ordinance, as detailed below, would reduce potential impacts to heritage trees to a less than significant level.

Table 3: Potential Heritage Trees on and Adjacent to the Project Site Tree ID Species
Number of
Trunks
Trunk Diameter
(inches)
Location of
Trunk(s)
Eligible for
Heritage Tree
Status?
BW-01 Southern California black walnut 2 92 On-site Yes BW-02 Southern California black walnut 2 39 On-site Yes

Page 95 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 30 ends

Tree ID Species
Number of
Trunks
Trunk Diameter
(inches)
Location of
Trunk(s)
Eligible for
Heritage Tree
Status?
BW-03 Southern California black walnut 4 122 Off-site Yes BW-04 Southern California black walnut 1 36 On-site Yes BW-05 Southern California black walnut 2 88 Off-site Yes BW-06 Southern California black walnut 2 32 On-site Yes BW-07 Southern California black walnut 1 4 On-site No
BW-08 Southern California black walnut 1 2 On-site No
BW-09 Southern California black walnut 0 0 On-site No
BW-10 Southern California black walnut 1 9 Off-site No
BW-11 Southern California black walnut 0 0 On-site No
BW-12 Southern California black walnut 1 16 Off-site No EL-01 Blue elderberry tree 6 12 On-site No
G-01 Lemon-scented gum 0 0 On-site No
G-02 Lemon-scented gum 1 21 Off-site Yes
G-03 Lemon-scented gum 1 42 Off-site Yes
G-04 Lemon-scented gum 1 29 On-site No
MP-01 Monterrey pine 1 37 Off-site Yes
OT-01 Coast live oak 1 29 On-site Yes
OT-02 Coast live oak 1 27 Off-site Yes
OT-03 Coast live oak 1 18 Off-site No
OT-04 Coast live oak 0 0 On-site No
OT-05 Coast live oak 1 4 On-site No
OT-06 Coast live oak 0 0 On-site No
OT-07 Coast live oak 1 9 Off-site No
WS-01 Western sycamore 3 100 On-site Yes
WS-02 Western sycamore 4 120 On-site Yes

Removal or relocation of a heritage tree, including those on private property, requires a permit from the Planning Department. The procedure for the Tree Removal Permit is as follows:

1. Is removal request in conjunction with a development application? • If No, then go to question 2.

Page 96 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 31 ends

• If Yes, follow permit process in Ordinance (RCMC Chapter 17.80) briefly discussed below. At least a 10-day notice to adjoining property owners is required before City can make a decision on permit request. Permit application available through Accelerate.

2. Are more than five trees or 50 linear feet of windrow being removed? • If No, follow the simplified permit process in Ordinance (RCMC Chapter 17.80). • If Yes, follow permit process in Ordinance (RCMC Chapter 17.80). At least a 10-day notice to adjoining property owners is required before City can make a decision on permit request.

Where request involves a development application, such as a Tentative Tract Map, Parcel Map, Conditional Use Permit, or Development Review, then the Tree Removal Permit request shall be considered by the Planning Commission concurrently with the development application. Permit application is available through Accelerate.

Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan There are no Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs), Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs), or other approved local, regional, or State HCPs applicable to the project site.5,6 Therefore, the project has no potential to conflict with any HCPs or NCCPs or other plan and no impact would occur.

Noise
Land Use Compatibility
As discussed below, the proposed project would not generate noise levels that are incompatible with surrounding residential land uses or otherwise in conflict with the City’s relevant General Plan or Municipal Code standards. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any significant effects related to noise and land use compatibility. The proposed project would be consistent with the General Plan and the extension would result in negligible or no expansion of use.

Substantial Temporary or Permanent Noise Increase
Construction Noise
Construction of the proposed project would be regulated by Section 17.66.050 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code. Pursuant to subdivision (a), noise generating activities would not occur between the hours of 8:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. on weekdays (including Saturday) or at any time on Sunday or a national holiday, and construction noise levels would be limited to 65 A-weighted decibels (dBA), as measured at adjacent residential property lines. The proposed project’s adherence to these standards would ensure that nearby residential land uses are not subject substantial temporary noise increases because (1) construction would be prohibited from occurring during sensitive nighttime, weekend, and holiday hours; and (2) daytime construction activities would not expose nearby residential land uses to noise levels that exceed the City’s acceptability standards.

5 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2023. NCCP Plan Summaries. Website:
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Planning/NCCP . Accessed July 17, 2023. 6 United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2023. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC). Website:
https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. Accessed July 17, 2023.

Page 97 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 32 ends

Regarding the latter point: Table N-1 of the City’s General Plan establishes that noise levels of 60 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) are considered acceptable for low-density residential land uses, such as those surrounding the project site.6 The proposed project’s intermittent construction noise levels up to 65 dBA would not correlate with time-averaged noise levels in excess of 60 dBA CNEL for the following key reasons. First, occupied residential buildings (i.e., homes–not garages or sheds) are generally located 50 feet or farther from the area of the proposed project’s construction. This means that noise levels of 65 dBA at residential property lines–the regulatory standard imposed by Section

17.66.050–would attenuate to below 60 dBA before reaching the actual residences themselves. Second, construction of the proposed project would be typified by intermittent periods of equipment operations followed by long periods of equipment inactivity. This is typical of small roadway projects, such as the proposed project, which do not involve substantial, continuous demolition or mass grading activities.

Construction of the proposed project is estimated to last no more than several months. Further, there are no unusual circumstances that suggest the proposed project’s construction would otherwise result in substantial noise levels–the proposed project is a common roadway extension project that improves circulation and public safety with negligible or no expansion of current uses. Moreover, this minor change is consistent with the General Plan.

Operation
The proposed project would not generate vehicle trips in and of itself, but it would facilitate vehicle travel along the existing road gap on Almond Street between Via Verde Street and Carnelian Street.

Some existing trips that presumably currently divert around this road gap could be transferred to Almond Street, which could subject residential land uses situated along Almond Street to noise increases from this additional traffic. This change would improve circulation and public safety but would not significantly expand uses. Given the low-density residential nature surrounding the project site, the levels of traffic facilitated by the proposed project would not be sufficient to result in noise levels exceeding 50 dBA CNEL, much less the City’s 60 dBA CNEL standard. Traffic on Almond Street would be commensurate with low-density residential thoroughfares that carry fewer than 100 vehicle trips per hour and are associated with low ambient noise conditions below 50 dBA CNEL. This is corroborated by Figure N-2 of the City’s General Plan, which shows that no roadway in the proposed project’s vicinity, including Almond Street, is associated with noise levels greater than 55 dBA CNEL. (The figure does not depict noise contours below 55 dBA CNEL, but it suggests that noise levels are far below 55 dBA CNEL in the area of the proposed project.) Development of the proposed project would not meaningfully alter these conditions. The proposed project would not include any substantial stationary sources of operational noise, such as mechanical equipment.

Groundborne Vibration
Construction
Section 17.66.070 of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code prohibits activity-generated vibrations that cause discomfort or annoyance to “reasonably persons of normal sensitivity” or “endangers the comfort, repose, health, or peace of residents whose property abuts the property line of the parcel.” As established by Section 17.66.070 of the Municipal Code and Table N-2 of the City’s General Plan, this level of groundborne vibration is equated with an annoyance threshold of 85

Page 98 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 33 ends

vibrations in decibels (VdB). Construction would utilize earthmoving vehicles that generate groundborne vibration levels up to 87 VdB at 25 feet, but these vehicles would operate 50 feet or farther from occupied residences, meaning that groundborne vibration levels at these residences would not exceed 78 VdB. As a result, the proposed project would not result in significant effects related to construction- related groundborne vibration.

Operation
The proposed project would not include stationary sources of groundborne vibration. Vehicle travel along Almond Street facilitated by the proposed project would not expose surrounding occupied residences to groundborne vibration levels in excess of 85 VdB. As noted above, not even the proposed project’s heavy-duty earthmoving vehicles would be capable of inducing this impact when operating within the limits of the proposed right-of-way. Vehicles traveling along Almond Street would result in much lower groundborne vibration levels that are far below the 85 VdB threshold of significance.

Groundborne vibration levels from conventional traffic (i.e., passenger automobiles, delivery vehicles, buses, etc.) are typically imperceptible. As a result, the proposed project would not result in significant effects related to operations-related groundborne vibration.

Airport Noise
The proposed project would not expose people to excessive noise levels from aircraft, and no significant effect would occur.

Scenic Highways
The nearest officially designated State Scenic Highway is State Route (SR) 2, which is 14.3 miles north of the project site. SR-138, which is 12.5 miles northeast of the project site, is eligible for the State Scenic Highway Program.7 The project site is not visible from SR-2 or from SR-138, and even if this portion of SR-138 were to obtain official designation, the proposed project would still not obstruct any views from a State Scenic Highway.

Hazardous Waste Sites
According to the Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List from the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC), the proposed project is not located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The nearest site, Liberty Groves (T0607100093), is located 2.5 miles southwest of the project site. Cleanup of Liberty Groves occurred in 1989, and the DTSC website lists its status as complete.8
Historical/Cultural Resources
The proposed project is a small roadway improvement that does not involve substantial demolition or mass grading. The following section evaluates the extent to which the proposed project could result in

7 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2018. California State Scenic Highway Map. Website:
https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46cc8e8057116f1aacaa. Accessed March 31, 2023. 8 California State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board). 2021. GeoTracker– Liberty Groves (T0607100093). Website:
https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/profile_report.asp?global_id=T0607100093. Accessed March 31, 2023.

Page 99 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 34 ends

project-related impacts on cultural resources. For purposes of exception 15300.2(f), historical resources include both built environment and archaeological/cultural resources. The General Plan Standard Conditions of Approval listed in Attachment A would be implemented to avoid impacts resulting from inadvertent discoveries of resources.

The following section evaluates the extent to which the project could result in project-related impacts on cultural resources. It includes the results of cultural resources record searches conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) located at California State University, Fullerton, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) and a pedestrian survey of the project site conducted by FirstCarbon Solutions (FCS). The current inventories of the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR), the California Historic Landmarks (CHL) list, the California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI) list, and the California Built Environment Resource Directory (BERD) for the County of San Bernardino were also reviewed. The purpose of this assessment is to identify the presence or absence of potentially significant cultural resources within the project area, and if such resources would be impacted by the proposed development, to provide recommendations for mitigation and/or further study or research.

South Central Coastal Information Center Records Search Results On May 11, 2023, a record search/literature review was conducted at the SCCIC. The purpose of this review was to access any existing cultural resources survey reports, archaeological site records, and historic maps to evaluate whether previously documented prehistoric or historic archaeological sites, architectural resources, or cultural landscapes exist within or near the project site. The record search/literature review was also conducted to evaluate whether the project site contains any historic properties listed on or determined eligible for listing on the NRHP , CRHR, the CHL list, the CPHI list, and the BERD for San Bernardino County.

The results of the SCCIC records search indicate that there are no known archaeological or historic resources located within the project site. There is one historic era resource within a 0.5-mile radius of the project site (Table 4). In addition, there are five area-specific survey reports on file with the SCCIC, two of which (SB-00563 and SB-01901) entirely address the proposed project, indicating that the project site has been previously surveyed for cultural resources (Table 5). Records search results from the SCCIC can be found in Attachment B.

Table 4: Cultural Resources Located Within a 0.5-mile Radius of the Project Site Resource No. Resource Description Date Recorded
P-36-007694 CA-SBR-007694H: LADWP Boulder Transmission Lines, AH04, AH07, HP11, HP37
1986, 1993, 1995,
1997, 2000, 2001,
2004, 2006, 2007,
2008, 2011, 2012,
2013, 2014, 2015,
2017, 2018, 2020
Source: South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) Records Search. May 11, 2023.

Page 100 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 35 ends

Table 5: Previous Investigations Within a 0.5-mile Radius of the Project Site Report No. Report Title/Project Focus Author Date
SB-00356 Archaeological–Historical Resources Assessment of Various Parcels Alta Loma/Cucamonga Area
Ruth D. Harris 1976
SB-00563 Archaeological–Historical Resources Assessment of 52.94 Acre Portion of the King Ranch in the Alta Loma, Cucamonga Area Joseph E. Hearn 1977
SB-01901 Vegetation and Watershed Management, Archaeological Review, Alta Loma VMP Project
Richard C. Jenkins 1987
SB-05101 Historical/Archaeological Resources Survey Report: Carrari Ranch Project, Tentative Tract No. 16925 near the City of Rancho Cucamonga, San Bernardino County, California
Miriam Dahdul 2005
SB-07318 Archaeological Survey Report for Southern California Edison Company's Replacement of Three Deteriorated Power Pole
Structures: Interpace 33kV/Ceramic 4kV; Blanco 12kV; and Del Carbon 12kV Circuits Riverside and San Bernardino Counties James Schmidt 2012
Source: South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) Records Search. May 11, 2023.

Reports listed in Bold are within the project site.

Native American Consultation
On March 30, 2023, FCS contacted the NAHC to determine whether any sacred sites were located within the project site or its vicinity. A response was received on April 27, 2023, indicating that the SLF search produced a positive result for Native American cultural resources in the project site. The NAHC included a list of 17 tribal representatives available for consultation. On April 28, 2023, a letter containing project information and requesting any additional information was sent to each tribal representative. Two responses were received, on April 28, 2023, and May 2, 2023, from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and the Gabrielino-Tongva Tribe, respectively. The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians indicated that the project site is not within tribe’s traditional use area and therefore deferred to other tribes in the area. The Gabrieleño-Tongva tribe had no comment about the proposed project. Copies of written communications between the NAHC and the listed Native American tribal members who may have additional knowledge of the project area can be found in Attachment B.

Pedestrian Survey Results
On May 25, 2023, FCS Archaeologist Sam Banderas conducted a pedestrian survey for unrecorded cultural resources at the project site. The survey covered the linear subject property where possible, beginning on the eastern side of the proposed project moving west. The project site consists of a relatively flat dirt road that is bounded by heavy vegetation to the north, residential properties and a drainage ditch/culvert to the south, and Almond Street to the east and west. Soil visibility across the project site was moderate, ranging from 50 to 60 percent due to bushes and other vegetation. Observed soil composition consisted of grayish brown/dark brown silty sand with gravel inclusions. The dirt road is highly disturbed and possibly used to access a private residence to the north of the project site.

Page 101 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 36 ends

Survey conditions were documented using digital photographs and field notes. During the survey, Mr.

Banderas examined all areas of the exposed ground surface for prehistoric artifacts (e.g., fire-affected rock, milling tools, flaked stone tools, toolmaking debris, ceramics), soil discoloration and depressions that might indicate the presence of a cultural midden, faunal and human osteological remains, and features indicative of the former presence of structures or buildings (e.g., postholes, standing exterior walls, foundations) or historic debris (e.g., glass, metal, ceramics). All areas of the project site were closely inspected for culturally modified soils or other indicators of potential historic or prehistoric resources. No historic or prehistoric cultural resources or raw materials commonly used in the manufacture of tools (e.g., obsidian, Franciscan chert) were observed. Pedestrian survey photographs can be found in Attachment B.

Summary and Recommendations
Based on the results of the records searches, archival research, and pedestrian survey, FCS considers the proposed project to have a low potential to have an adverse effect on historic or prehistoric cultural resources. The NAHC SLF search produced a positive result for recorded Tribal Cultural Resources (TCRs) in the project area; however, the SCCIC results indicate there are no recorded cultural resources in the project site and only one recorded historic era resource within the 0.5-mile search radius. Furthermore, the project site has been previously and recently surveyed for cultural resources with negative results, and responses received from tribal representatives did not indicate concern over or knowledge of TCRs that may be adversely impacted by the proposed project.

In accordance with the General Plan and the City’s Standard Conditions of Approval 5.5-2, 5.18-1, 5.18-2, and 5.18-6, in the event that buried cultural resources and/or human remains are discovered during construction, operations shall stop within 100 feet of the find and a qualified Archaeologist shall be consulted to determine whether the resource requires further study. The qualified Archaeologist shall make recommendations to the lead agency on the measures that shall be implemented to protect the discovered resources, including but not limited to excavation of the finds and evaluation of the finds in accordance with Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. Potentially significant cultural resources consist of but are not limited to stone, bone, fossils, wood, or shell artifacts or features, including hearths, structural remains, or historic dumpsites. Any previously undiscovered resources found during construction within the project area should be recorded on appropriate California Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated for significance in terms of CEQA criteria. If the resources are determined to be unique historic resources as defined under Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, mitigation measures shall be identified by the Archaeologist and recommended to the lead agency.

Appropriate minimization measures for significant resources could include avoidance or capping, incorporation of the site in green space, parks, or open space, or data recovery excavations of the finds.

Implementation of the General Plan Standard Conditions of Approval would reduce impacts resulting from inadvertent discoveries of resources to a less than significant level, and as such, the exception in 15300.2(f) does not apply to the proposed project.

Page 102 ends

City of Rancho Cucamonga
August 13, 2024

Page 37 ends

CONCLUSION
As demonstrated above, the proposed project would improve public safety, is consistent with the allowable land use and geographic area identified in the General Plan, and is therefore within the scope of the activity evaluated in the General Plan, and no new environmental document is required consistent with Section 15168.

Separately, the proposed project would improve circulation and public safety with negligible or no expansion of use and is categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15301(c) (Class 1).

Finally, the proposed project qualifies for exemption under Section 15303(d) (Class 3) because it is a small 900-foot street improvement. None of the exceptions to the Categorical Exemptions set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 apply to the proposed project.

ATTACHMENTS
Attachment A: Standard Conditions of Approval
Attachment B: Air Quality Supporting Information and Modeling Results Attachment C: Species with Potential to Occur On-Site
Attachment D: Cultural Resources Documents

Page 103 ends

Attachment A:

Standard Conditions of Approval

Page 104 ends

Attachment A.1 Standard Condi�ons of
Approval Air Quality
COA

5.3-1 The City shall ensure that discretionary development will incorporate best management practices (BMPs) to reduce emissions to be less than applicable thresholds. These BMPs include but are not limited to the most recent South Coast AQMD recommendations for construction BMPs (per South Coast AQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook, South Coast AQMD’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the 2016 AQMP , and SCAG’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, or as otherwise identified by South Coast AQMD).

COA 5.3-2 Applicants for future discretionary development projects that would generate construction-related emissions that exceed applicable thresholds, will include, but are not limited to, the mitigation measures recommended by South Coast AQMD (in its CEQA Air Quality Handbook or otherwise), to the extent feasible and applicable to the project. The types of measures shall include but are not limited to: maintaining equipment per manufacturer specifications; lengthening construction duration to minimize number of vehicle and equipment operating at the same time; requiring use of construction equipment rated by the EPA as having Tier 3 (model year 2006 or newer) or Tier 4 (model year 2008 or newer) emissions limits, applicable for engines between 50 and 750 horsepower; and using electric-powered or other alternative-fueled equipment in place of diesel-powered equipment (whenever feasible). Tier 3 equipment can achieve average emissions reductions of 57 percent for NO x, 84 percent for VOC, and 50
percent for particulate matter compared to Tier 1 equipment. Tier 4 equipment can achieve average emissions reductions of 71 percent for NO x, 86 percent for VOC, and 96
percent for particulate matter compared to Tier 1 equipment.

COA 5.3-3 The City shall ensure that discretionary development that will generate fugitive dust emissions during construction activities will, to the extent feasible, incorporate BMPs that exceed South Coast AQMD’s Rule 403 requirements to reduce emissions to be less than applicable thresholds.

COA 5.3-4 Applicants for future discretionary development projects which will generate construction-related fugitive dust emissions that exceed applicable thresholds will include, but are not limited to, the mitigation measures recommended by South Coast AQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook, to the extent feasible and applicable.

Page 105 ends

Biological Resources
COA 5.4-1: Special status plant and wildlife species have the poten�al to occur within the proposed General Plan Update Study Area. Any project that involves the removal of habitat must consider if any special status species (e.g., Threatened or Endangered species, CNPS List 1B and 2 plants, or species protected under Sec�on 15380 of CEQA) are poten�ally present on the project site and if the project impacts could be considered signiﬁcant by the City. If poten�al habitat is present in an area, focused surveys shall be conducted prior to construc�on ac�vi�es in order to document the presence or absence of a species on the project site. Botanical surveys shall be conducted during the appropriate blooming period for a species. If no special status species are found on the project site, no addi�onal ac�on is warranted. If special status species are found, appropriate mi�ga�on would be required in coordina�on with the City, consistent with its performance criteria of mi�ga�ng lost habitat at a ra�o no less than one to one (one acre restored for every acre impacted).

COA 5.4-2: Any project within the proposed General Plan Update Study Area that impacts a Federally listed species, based on a biological survey or other analysis of the project, shall be required to secure take authoriza�on through Sec�on 7 or Sec�on 10 of the Federal Endangered Species Act (FESA) prior to project implementa�on. Compensa�on for impacts to the listed species and their habitat shall be mi�gated at a ra�o no less than one to one (one acre restored for every acre impacted). Project applicants shall be required to plan, implement, monitor, and maintain the mi�gated habitat according to the requirements of the Biological Opinion (Sec�on 7) or Habitat Conserva�on Plan (Sec�on 10) for the project. Prior to issuance of the ﬁrst ac�on and/or permit which would allow for site disturbance (e.g., grading permit), a detailed mi�ga�on plan shall be prepared by a qualiﬁed biologist for approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the USFWS, and shall include: (1) the responsibili�es and qualiﬁca�ons of the personnel to implement and supervise the plan; (2) site selec�on; (3) site prepara�on and plan�ng implementa�on; (4) a schedule; (5) maintenance plan/guidelines; (6) a monitoring plan; and (7) long-term preserva�on requirements.

COA 5.4-3: Any project within the proposed General Plan Update Study Area that impacts a State- listed Threatened or Endangered species shall be required to obtain take authoriza�on (through an Incidental Take Permit) pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) and Sec�on 2081 of the California Fish and Game Code. If the species is also listed under the FESA, a consistency ﬁnding per Sec�on 2080.1 of CESA is issued when a project receives the USFWS Biological Opinion. Compensa�on for impacts to the listed species and their habitat shall be mi�gated at a ra�o no less than one to one (one acre restored for every acre impacted). Project applicants shall be required to plan, implement, monitor, and maintain the mi�gated habitat according to the requirements of the 2080 CESA process. Prior to issuance of the ﬁrst ac�on and/or permit which would allow for site disturbance (e.g., grading permit), a detailed mi�ga�on plan shall be prepared by a qualiﬁed biologist for approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and shall include: (1) the responsibili�es and

Page 106 ends

qualiﬁca�ons of the personnel to implement and supervise the plan; (2) site selec�on; (3)site prepara�on and plan�ng implementa�on; (4) a schedule; (5) a maintenance plan/guidelines; (6) a monitoring plan; and (7) long-term preserva�on requirements.

COA 5.4-4: To avoid conﬂicts with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Bald/Golden Eagle Protec�on Act, construc�on ac�vi�es involving vegeta�on removal shall be conducted between September 16 and March 14. If construc�on occurs inside the peak nes�ng season (between March 15 and September 15), a preconstruc�on survey (or possibly mul�ple surveys) by a qualiﬁed biologist is recommended prior to construc�on ac�vi�es to iden�fy any ac�ve nes�ng loca�ons. If the biologist does not ﬁnd any ac�ve nests within the project site, the construc�on work shall be allowed to proceed. If the biologist ﬁnds an ac�ve nest within the project site and determines that the nest may be impacted, the biologist shall delineate an appropriate buﬀer zone around the nest; the size of the buﬀer zone shall depend on the aﬀected species and the type of construc�on ac�vity.

Any ac�ve nests observed during the survey shall be mapped on an aerial photograph.

Only construc�on ac�vi�es (if any) that have been approved by a biological monitor shall take place within the buﬀer zone un�l the nest is vacated. The biologist shall serve as a construc�on monitor when construc�on ac�vi�es take place near ac�ve nest areas to ensure that no inadvertent impacts on these nests occur. Results of the pre- construc�on survey and any subsequent monitoring shall be provided to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and the City.

COA 5.4-5: A jurisdic�onal delinea�on shall be conducted if a project will impact jurisdic�onal resources. Permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) shall be required for impacts on areas within these agencies’ jurisdic�on. Acquisi�on and implementa�on of the permits may require mi�ga�on. Compensa�on for impacts to jurisdic�onal resources shall be mi�gated at a ra�o no less than one to one (one acre restored for every acre impacted). Project applicants shall be required to plan, implement, monitor, and maintain the mi�gated jurisdic�onal resource according to the requirements of USACE and RWQCB. Prior to issuance of the ﬁrst ac�on and/or permit that would allow for site disturbance (e.g., grading permit), a detailed mi�ga�on plan shall be prepared by a qualiﬁed biologist for approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the appropriate resource agencies, and shall include: (1) the responsibili�es and qualiﬁca�ons of the personnel to implement and supervise the plan; (2) site selec�on; (3) site prepara�on and plan�ng implementa�on; (4) a schedule; (5) maintenance plan/guidelines; (6) a monitoring plan; and (7) long-term preserva�on requirements.

COA 5.4-6: The Porter-Cologne Act and Sec�ons 1600 to 1616 of the California Fish and Game Code protect “waters of the State.” Agreements (Streambed Altera�on Agreements) from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) shall be required for impacts on areas in CDFW’s jurisdic�on. Acquisi�on and implementa�on of the agreement may require mi�ga�on. Compensa�on for impacts to CDFW resources shall be mi�gated at a ra�o no less than one to one (one acre restored for every acre impacted). Project applicants shall

Page 107 ends

be required to plan, implement, monitor, and maintain the mi�ga�on areas according to CDFW requirements. Prior to issuance of the ﬁrst ac�on and/or permit which would allow for site disturbance (e.g., grading permit), a detailed mi�ga�on plan shall be prepared by a qualiﬁed biologist for approval by the City of Rancho Cucamonga and CDFW, and shall include: (1) the responsibili�es and qualiﬁca�ons of the personnel to implement and supervise the plan; (2) site selec�on; (3) site prepara�on and plan�ng implementa�on; (4) a schedule; (5) maintenance plan/guidelines; (6) a monitoring plan; and (7) long-term preserva�on requirements.

Page 108 ends

Cultural Resources
COA 5.5-1 If a future project pursuant to the General Plan Update contains a designated Historical Landmark, the site shall be developed and maintained in accordance with the applicable Historic Landmark Alteration Permit. Any further modifications to the site including, but not limited to, exterior alterations and/or interior alterations which affect the exterior of the buildings or structures, removal of landmark trees, demolition, relocation, reconstruction of buildings or structures, or changes to the site, shall require a modification to the Certificate of Appropriateness subject to Historic Preservation Commission review and approval.

COA 5.5-2 If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project.

COA 5.5-3 If a building within the project area was constructed more than 50 years ago, the City will require a determination of whether the building, or site, could be considered historic. If the project is considered historic Chapter 17.18 Historic Preservation will apply.

COA 5.5-4 Prior to any construction activities that may affect historical resources (i.e., structures 45 years or older), a historical resources assessment shall be performed by an architectural historian or historian who meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professionally Qualified Standards in architectural history or history. This shall include a records search to determine if any resources that may be potentially affected by the project have been previously recorded, evaluated, and/or designated in the National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register. Following the records search, the qualified architectural historian shall conduct a reconnaissance-level and/or intensive-level survey in accordance with the California Office of Historic Preservation guidelines to identify any previously unrecorded potential historical resources that may be potentially affected by the proposed project. Pursuant to the definition of a historical resource under CEQA, potential historical resources shall be evaluated under a developed historic context.

COA 5.5-5 To ensure that projects requiring the relocation, rehabilitation, or alteration of a historical resource do not result in significant impact, the Secretary of Interior’s Standards for the Treatments of Historic Properties shall be used to the maximum extent possible. The application of the standards shall be overseen by a qualified architectural historian or historic architect meeting the Professionally Qualified Standards. Prior to any construction activities that may affect the historical resource, a report identifying and specifying the treatment of character-defining features and construction activities shall be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga.

Page 109 ends

COA 5.5-6 If a proposed project would result in the demolition or significant alteration of historical resource, it cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level. However, recordation of the resource prior to construction activities will assist in reducing adverse impacts to the resource to the greatest extent possible. Recordation shall take the form of Historic American Buildings Survey, Historic American Engineering Record, or Historic American Landscape Survey documentation and shall be performed by an architectural historian or historian who meets the Professionally Qualified Standards. Documentation shall include an architectural and historical narrative; medium- or large-format black and white photographs, negatives, and prints; and supplementary information such as building plans and elevations and/or historical photographs. Documentation shall be reproduced on archival paper and placed in appropriate local, State, or federal institutions. The specific scope and details of documentation would be developed at the project level.

COA 5.5-7 If cultural resources that are eligible for listing to the National Register of Historic Places, California Register of Historic Resources, or a local register are identified within or adjacent to the proposed development, the construction limits shall be clearly flagged to ensure impacts to eligible cultural resources are avoided or minimized to the extent feasible. Prior to implementing construction activities, a qualified Archaeologist shall verify that the flagging clearly delineates the construction limits and eligible resources to be avoided. Since the location of some eligible cultural resources is confidential, these resources will be flagged as environmentally sensitive areas.

COA 5.5-8 To determine the archaeological sensitivity for discretionary projects within the City, an archaeological resources assessment shall be performed under the supervision of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professionally Qualified Standards in either prehistoric or historic archaeology. The assessments shall include a California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) records search and a search of the Sacred Lands File (SLF) maintained by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). The records searches shall determine if the proposed project has been previously surveyed for archaeological resources, identify and characterize the results of previous cultural resource surveys, and disclose any cultural resources that have been recorded and/or evaluated. A Phase I pedestrian survey shall be undertaken in areas that are undeveloped to locate any surface cultural materials. a
. I
f potentially significant archaeological resources are identified through an archaeological resources assessment, and impacts to these resources cannot be avoided, a Phase II Testing and Evaluation investigation shall be performed by an archaeologist who meets the PQS prior to any construction-related ground disturbing activities to determine significance. If resources determined significant or unique through Phase II testing, and site avoidance is not possible, appropriate site-specifi c
mi
tigation measures shall be established and undertaken. These might include a Phase III data recovery program that would be implemented by a qualified archaeologist and shall be performed in accordance with the Office of Historic

Page 110 ends

Preservation’s Archaeological Resource Management Reports (ARMR):

Recommended Contents and Format (1990) and Guidelines for Archaeological Research Designs (1991).
b. If the archaeological assessment did not identify potentially significant archaeologica l
r
esources within the proposed General Plan area but indicated the area to be highly sensitive for archaeological resources, a qualified archaeologist shall monitor all gr
ound-disturbing construction and pre-construction activities in areas with p
reviously undisturbed soil. The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities of the proper procedures in the event of an a
rchaeological discovery. The training shall be held in conjunction with the project’s initial on-site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeologica l
r
esources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground-disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the resources are evaluated for significance by an archaeologist who meets the PQS.

If the discovery proves to be significant, it shall be curated with a recognized scientific or educational repository.
c. If the archaeological assessment did not identify potentially significant archaeologica l
r
esources but indicates the area to be of medium sensitivity for archaeological r
esources, an archaeologist who meets the PQS shall be retained on an on-call basis.

The archaeologist shall inform all construction personnel prior to construction activities about the proper procedures in the event of an archaeological discovery.

The training shall be held in conjunction with the project’s initial on-site safety meeting and shall explain the importance and legal basis for the protection of significant archaeological resources. In the event that archaeological resources (artifacts or features) are exposed during ground-disturbing activities, construction activities in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall be halted while the on-ca ll
a
rchaeologist is contacted. If the discovery proves to be significant, it shall be curated with a recognized scientific or education repository.

C
OA 5.18-1 Inadvertent Archaeological Find. If, during ground-disturbance activities, cultural resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, the following procedures shall be followed. Cultural resources are defined as being multiple artifacts in close association with each other but also include fewer artifacts if the area of the find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined in consultation with the Native American tribe(s). a
. A
ll ground-disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the Archaeologist, the tribal representative(s), and the Planning Director to discuss the s
ignificance of the find.
b. A
t the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and, after consultation with the tribal representative(s) and the Archaeologist, a decision shall

Page 111 ends

be made, with the concurrence of the Planning Director, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resources. c. Grading or further ground-disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal Monitors if needed.
d. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreements entered into with the appropriate tribes. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in-place preservation of cultural resources located in native soils and/or re-burial on the project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as identified in Non-Disclosure of Reburial Locations Condition.
e. If
the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the project archaeologist, in consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan. f. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21083.2(b), avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and tribal cultural resources. If the landowner and the tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or tribal cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The City’s Planning Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological and tribal cultural resources and the recommendations of the project Archaeologist and shall take into account th e
c
ultural and religious principles and practices of the tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Planning Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council.

C
OA 5.18-2 Cultural Resources Disposition. In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries:
a. One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Rancho Cucamonga Planning Department:
i
. P
reservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources. ii. Reburial of the resources on the project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recording has been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods, and Native American human remains

Page 112 ends

are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request.
iii. I
f preservation in place or reburial is not feasible then the resources shall be curated in a culturally appropriate manner at a San Bernardino County curation facility that meets State Resources Department Office of Historic Preservation Guidelines for the Curation of Archaeological Resources ensuring access and us e
p
ursuant to the Guidelines. The collection and associated records shall be transferred, including title, and are to be accompanied by payment of the fees by the applicant necessary for permanent curation. Evidence of curation in the for m
o
f a letter from the curation facility stating that subject archaeological materials have been received and that all fees have been paid, shall be provided by the landowner to the City. There shall be no destructive or invasive testing on sacred items, burial goods, and Native American human remains, as defined by the cultural and religious practices of the Most Likely Descendant. Results concerning finds of any inadvertent discoveries shall be included in the Phase IV monitoring report.

C
OA 5.18-3 Archaeologist Retained. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the project applicant shall retain a qualified Registered Professional Archaeologist to monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. The Registered Professional Archaeologist and the Tribal Monitor(s) shall manage and oversee monitoring for all initial ground-disturbing activities and excavation of each portion of the project site, including clearing, grubbing, tree removals, mass or rough grading, trenching, stockpiling of materials, rock crushing, structure demolition, etc. The Registered Professional Archaeologist and the Tribal Monitor(s) shall independently have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect, or halt the ground-disturbance activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources in coordination with any required special interest or tribal monitors. The developer/permit holder shall submit a fully executed copy of the contract to the Planning Department to ensure compliance with this condition of approval. Upon verification, the Planning Department shall clear this condition. In addition, the Registered Professional Archaeologist, in consultation with the consulting tribe(s), the contractor, and the City, shall develop a Cultural Resources Management Plan (CRMP) in consultation pursuant to the definition in Assembly Bill (AB) 52 to address the details, timing, and responsibility of all archaeological and cultural activities that will occur on the project site. A consulting tribe is defined as a tribe that initiated the AB 52 tribal consultation process for the project, has not opted out of the AB 52 consultation process, and has completed AB 52 consultation with the City as provided for in Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.2(b)(1) of AB 52. Details in the Plan shall include:
a
. P
roject grading and development scheduling.

Page 113 ends

b. The Pr oject Archaeologist and the consulting tribes(s) shall attend the pre -grading m
eeting with the City, the construction manager, and any contractors and will conduct a mandatory Cultural Resources Worker Sensitivity Training to those in attendance. The training will include a brief review of the cultural sensitivity of the project and the surrounding area; what resources could potentially be identified during earthmoving activities; the requirements of the monitoring program; the protocols that apply in the event inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources are identified, including who to contact and appropriate avoidance measures until th e
f
ind(s) can be properly evaluated; and any other appropriate protocols. All new construction personnel that will conduct earthwork or grading activities that begin w
ork on the project following the initial training must take the Cultural Sensitivity Training prior to beginning work, and the Project Archaeologist and consulting t
ribe(s) shall make themselves available to provide the training on an as-needed basis.
c. The protocols and stipulations that the contractor, City, consulting tribe(s), and archaeologist will follow in the event of inadvertent cultural resources discoveries, including any newly discovered cultural resource deposits that shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation.

COA 5.18-4 Native American Monitoring. Tribal monitor(s) shall be required on-site during all ground-disturbing activities, including grading, stockpiling of materials, engineered fill, rock crushing, etc. The land divider/permit holder shall retain a qualified tribal monitor(s) from the requesting tribe. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall submit a copy of a signed contract between the tribe and the land divider/permit holder for the monitoring of the project to the Planning Department and to the Engineering Department. The Tribal Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect, or halt the ground-disturbance activities to allow recovery of cultural resources, in coordination with the Project Archaeologist.

COA 5.18-5 Archaeology Report–Phase III and IV. Prior to final inspection, the developer/permit holder shall prompt the Project Archeologist to submit two copies of the Phase III Data Recovery report (if required for the project) and the Phase IV Cultural Resources Monitoring Report that complies with the Community Development Department's requirements for such reports. The Phase IV report shall include evidence of the required cultural/historical sensitivity training for the construction staff held during the pre-grade meeting. The Planning Department shall review the reports to determine adequate mitigation compliance. Provided the reports are adequate, the Community Development Department shall clear this condition. Once the report(s) are determined to be adequate, two (2) copies shall be submitted to the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton and one copy shall be submitted to the consulting tribe(s) Cultural Resources Department(s).

COA 5.18-6 Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the San Bernardino

Page 114 ends

County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the San Bernardino County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission shall be contacted within the period specified by law (24 hours). Subsequently, the Native American Heritage Commission shall identify the "most likely descendant." The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations and engage in consultation concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98.

COA 5.18-7 Non-Disclosure of Reburial Locations. It is understood by all parties that unless otherwise required by law, the site of any reburial of Native American human remains or associated grave goods shall not be disclosed and shall not be governed by public disclosure requirements of the California Public Records Act. The Coroner, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r)., parties, and lead agencies will be asked to withhold public disclosure information related to such reburial, pursuant to the specific exemption set forth in California Government Code 6254 (r).

Page 115 ends

Attachment B:

Air Quality Supporting Information and Modeling Results

Page 116 ends

Attachment B: Air Quality Supporting Information and
Modeling Results
Table of Contents
P
roject CalEEMod Notes ........................................................................................................ 1 Project Construction CalEEMod Output .................................................................................. 2 Project Construction Localized Significance Threshold CalEEMod Output ............................. 17

Page 117 ends

Rancho Cucamonga Almond Street Extension Project CalEEMod Notes Land Use – The road is approximately 0.2 mile (1,056 feet) long and 44 feet wide with 6 feet of sidewalk on each side, which is 69,696 square feet. Therefore, the area of construction is set to be 2 acres to be conservative.

Construction – The road is set to be currently weathered-rock earth. Construction would start in August 2024 and last 55 workdays based on applicant-provided information.

Construction: Dust from Material Movement – Assume the land clearing would clear the surface layer of gravel and small rocks, which would total 43 cubic yard. With a density of 2,300 pounds per cubic yard, land clearing would generate approximately 50 tons of export material.

Grading would generate approximately 1,000 cubic yards of export material based on applicant’s information.

Construction materials include concrete for sidewalk (6 feet wide, 6 inch deep, 2 sides of 1,056 feet long, approximately 240 cubic yard), gutter (1.73 cubic feet per linear feet of road, approximately 150 cubic yard), culverts, and other materials, which totals to be approximately 1,000 cubic yards as a conservative estimate.

Construction: Off-Road Equipment – Signal boards are added to equipment list.

Construction: Trips and VMT – 5 worker trips are added to represent construction trips.

Paving would apply 6 inch (0.5 feet) of asphalt for the 1,056-foot long and 44-foot wide road, which would total 23,232 cubic feet, or 860 cubic yards. With density of 145 pounds per cubic feet for asphalt, the mass would be 3.37 million pounds, or 1,690 tons of asphalt. Assume vendor truck’s capacity is 50,000 pounds, and it would generate 7 vendor trips per day during Paving Phase.

Attachment A

Page 1 ends

Page 118 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
1 / 15
Almond St Extension Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Linear, Grading & Excavation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Linear, Paving (2024) - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles
Attachment A

Page 2 ends

Page 119 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
2 / 15

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

8. User Changes to Default Data
Attachment A

Page 3 ends

Page 120 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
3 / 15

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Almond St Extension
Construction Start Date 8/19/2024
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 12.0
Location 34.161985, -117.617861
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Rancho Cucamonga
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5265
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.12

1.2. Land Use Types
Land Use Subtype Size Unit Lot Acreage Building Area (sq ft) Landscape Area (sq ft)
Special Landscape
Area
(sq ft)
Population Description
Road Construction 0.20 Mile 2.00 0.00 0.00 — — road extension Attachment A

Page 4 ends

Page 121 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
4 / 15

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.51 0.43 3.69 3.52 < 0.005 0.24 — 0.24 0.23 — 0.23 — 491 491 0.02 < 0.005 — 492 Dust
F
rom
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.53 0.53 — 0.06 0.06 — — — — — — —
Demolitio
n
— — — — — — 0.14 0.14 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.05 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 6.72 6.72 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.74 Dust
F
rom
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.01 0.01 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Attachment A

Page 5 ends

Page 122 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
5 / 15
Demolitio — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment
< 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 1.11 1.11 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.12 Dust
F
rom
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Demolitio
n
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 72.0 72.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.29 73.1 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 31.4 31.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 32.9 Hauling 0.05 0.01 0.45 0.25 < 0.005 0.01 0.23 0.24 < 0.005 0.06 0.07 — 366 366 0.04 0.06 0.77 385 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.92 0.92 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.93 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.43 0.43 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.45 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 5.02 5.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 5.27 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.15 0.15 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.07 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.07 Attachment A

Page 6 ends

Page 123 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
6 / 15
Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.83 0.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.87

3.3. Linear, Grading & Excavation (2024) - Unmitigated
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.45 1.22 9.59 11.8 0.02 0.46 — 0.46 0.43 — 0.43 — 1,777 1,777 0.07 0.01 — 1,783 Dust
F
rom
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.53 0.53 — 0.06 0.06 — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.06 0.05 0.39 0.49 < 0.005 0.02 — 0.02 0.02 — 0.02 — 73.0 73.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 73.3 Dust
F
rom
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.02 0.02 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 0.01 0.07 0.09 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 12.1 12.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 12.1 Attachment A

Page 7 ends

Page 124 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
7 / 15
Dust
F
rom
Material
Movement
— — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 72.0 72.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.29 73.1 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 31.4 31.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 32.9 Hauling 0.08 0.01 0.72 0.40 < 0.005 0.01 0.38 0.39 0.01 0.10 0.10 — 587 587 0.06 0.09 1.23 618 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.75 2.75 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 2.79 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.29 1.29 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.35 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.1 24.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 25.4 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.46 0.46 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.46 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.21 0.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.22 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.99 3.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.20

3.5. Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade (2024) - Unmitigated Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Attachment A

Page 8 ends

Page 125 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
8 / 15
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

3.27 2.74 26.3 24.6 0.05 1.07 — 1.07 0.98 — 0.98 — 5,693 5,693 0.23 0.05 — 5,712 Dust
F
rom
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 2.65 2.65 — 0.29 0.29 — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.22 0.19 1.80 1.69 < 0.005 0.07 — 0.07 0.07 — 0.07 — 390 390 0.02 < 0.005 — 391 Dust
F
rom
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.18 0.18 — 0.02 0.02 — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.04 0.03 0.33 0.31 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 64.6 64.6 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 64.8 Attachment A

Page 9 ends

Page 126 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
9 / 15
Dust
F
rom
Material
Movement
— — — — — — 0.03 0.03 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — —
Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.42 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 72.0 72.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.29 73.1 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 62.7 62.7 < 0.005 0.01 0.17 65.8 Hauling 0.05 0.01 0.43 0.24 < 0.005 0.01 0.23 0.23 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 — 352 352 0.04 0.06 0.74 371 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 66.0 66.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 66.8 Vendor 0.01 < 0.005 0.07 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 — 62.7 62.7 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 65.6 Hauling 0.05 0.01 0.45 0.24 < 0.005 0.01 0.23 0.23 < 0.005 0.06 0.06 — 352 352 0.04 0.06 0.02 370 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.58 4.58 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.65 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 4.30 4.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 4.50 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.03 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 24.1 24.1 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.02 25.4 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.76 0.76 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.77 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.71 0.71 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.75 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.99 3.99 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.20

3.7. Linear, Paving (2024) - Unmitigated
Attachment A

Page 10 ends

Page 127 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
10 / 15
Criteria Pollutants (lb/day for daily, ton/yr for annual) and GHGs (lb/day for daily, MT/yr for annual) Location TOG ROG NOx CO SO2 PM10E PM10D PM10T PM2.5E PM2.5D PM2.5T BCO2 NBCO2 CO2T CH4 N2O R CO2e Onsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

1.14 0.96 8.15 10.9 0.01 0.39 — 0.39 0.36 — 0.36 — 1,620 1,620 0.07 0.01 — 1,626 Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.03 0.03 0.22 0.30 < 0.005 0.01 — 0.01 0.01 — 0.01 — 44.4 44.4 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 44.5 Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Off-Road
Equipment

0.01 < 0.005 0.04 0.05 < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 — 7.35 7.35 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 7.37 Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.03 0.02 0.03 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.19 0.00 0.05 0.05 — 66.0 66.0 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 66.8 Vendor 0.02 0.01 0.26 0.14 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.15 0.16 < 0.005 0.04 0.04 — 220 220 0.02 0.03 0.02 230 Attachment A

Page 11 ends

Page 128 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
11 / 15
Hauling 0.02 < 0.005 0.18 0.10 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.09 0.09 < 0.005 0.02 0.03 — 141 141 0.02 0.02 0.01 148 Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.83 1.83 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.86 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 6.01 6.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 6.30 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.86 3.86 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 4.06 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.30 0.30 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.31 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 1.00 1.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 1.04 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.64 0.64 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.67

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Days Per Week Work Days per Phase Phase Description Demolition Linear, Grubbing & Land
Clear
ing
8/19/2024 8/23/2024 5.00 5.00 —
Grading Linear, Grading &
Exca
vation
8/26/2024 9/13/2024 5.00 15.0 —
Construction Linear, Drainage, Utilities, &
Sub-Gr
ade
9/16/2024 10/18/2024 5.00 25.0 —
Paving Linear, Paving 10/21/2024 11/1/2024 5.00 10.0 —

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Equipment Type Fuel Type Engine Tier Number per Day Hours Per Day Horsepower Load Factor Demolition Crawler Tractors Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 87.0 0.43 Attachment A

Page 12 ends

Page 129 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
12 / 15
Demolition Excavators Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 36.0 0.38 Demolition Signal Boards Electric Average 1.00 8.00 6.00 0.82 Grading Excavators Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Grading Rollers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Grading Rubber Tired Loaders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 150 0.36 Grading Signal Boards Electric Average 1.00 8.00 6.00 0.82 Construction Air Compressors Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 37.0 0.48 Construction Generator Sets Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 14.0 0.74 Construction Graders Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 148 0.41
Construction Plate Compactors Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 8.00 0.43 Construction Pumps Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 11.0 0.74
Construction Rough Terrain Forklifts Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 96.0 0.40 Construction Scrapers Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 423 0.48 Construction Signal Boards Electric Average 1.00 8.00 6.00 0.82 Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37
Paving Pavers Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 81.0 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment Diesel Average 1.00 8.00 89.0 0.36 Paving Rollers Diesel Average 3.00 8.00 36.0 0.38
Paving Signal Boards Electric Average 1.00 8.00 6.00 0.82 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backh
oes
Diesel Average 2.00 8.00 84.0 0.37

5.3. Construction Vehicles

5.3.1. Unmitigated
Phase Name Trip Type One-Way Trips per Day Miles per Trip Vehicle Mix Attachment A

Page 13 ends

Page 130 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
13 / 15
Demolition — — — —
Demolition Worker 5.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Demolition Vendor 1.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Demolition Hauling 5.20 20.0 HHDT
Demolition Onsite truck — — HHDT
Grading — — — —
Grading Worker 5.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Grading Vendor 1.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Grading Hauling 8.33 20.0 HHDT
Grading Onsite truck — — HHDT
Construction — — — —
Construction Worker 5.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Construction Vendor 2.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Construction Hauling 5.00 20.0 HHDT
Construction Onsite truck — — HHDT
Paving — — — —
Paving Worker 5.00 18.5 LDA,LDT1,LDT2
Paving Vendor 7.00 10.2 HHDT,MHDT
Paving Hauling 2.00 20.0 HHDT
Paving Onsite truck — — HHDT

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water unpaved roads twice daily 55% 55%
Limit vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 25 mph 44% 44% Attachment A

Page 14 ends

Page 131 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
14 / 15

5.5. Architectural Coatings
Phase Name Residential Interior Area Coated
(sq
ft)
Residential Exterior Area Coated
(sq
ft)
Non-Residential Interior Area
Coated
(sq ft)
Non-Residential Exterior Area
Coated
(sq ft)
Parking Area Coated (sq ft)

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities
Phase Name Material Imported (Cubic Y ards) Material Exported (Cubic Y ards) Acres Graded (acres) Material Demolished (Ton of Debr
is)
Acres Paved (acres)
Demolition — 100 2.00 50.0 —
Grading — 1,000 2.00 0.00 —
Construction 1,000 — 2.00 0.00 —

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies
Control Strategies Applied Frequency (per day) PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Water Demolished Area 2 36% 36%

5.7. Construction Paving
Land Use Area Paved (acres) % Asphalt
Road Construction 2.00 100%

8. User Changes to Default Data
Screen Justification
Land Use The land use summary is based on site plan and applicant-provided information.

Construction: Construction Phases The schedule lasts 55 days based on applicant-provided information.

Attachment A

Page 15 ends

Page 132 ends

Almond St Extension Custom Report, 5/9/2023
15 / 15
Construction: Trips and VMT The Worker Trips are assumed to be 5 one-way trips each day.

Construction: Architectural Coatings Asphalt painting is needed.

Construction: Paving The paved area is based on land use summary.

Operations: Architectural Coatings Based on applicant-provided information, the interior painting is not needed.

Construction: Demolition Assume 50 tons of gravel would be cleared during demolition.

Construction: Off-Road Equipment The Signal Boards are added to the equipment list.

Attachment A

Page 16 ends

Page 133 ends

Almond St Extension LST Custom Report, 5/9/2023
1 / 15
Almond St Extension LST Custom Report
Table of Contents

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information

1.2. Land Use Types

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector

3. Construction Emissions Details

3.1. Linear, Grubbing & Land Clearing (2024) - Unmitigated

3.3. Linear, Grading & Excavation (2024) - Unmitigated

3.5. Linear, Drainage, Utilities, & Sub-Grade (2024) - Unmitigated

3.7. Linear, Paving (2024) - Unmitigated

5. Activity Data

5.1. Construction Schedule

5.2. Off-Road Equipment

5.2.1. Unmitigated

5.3. Construction Vehicles
Attachment A

Page 17 ends

Page 134 ends

Almond St Extension LST Custom Report, 5/9/2023
2 / 15

5.3.1. Unmitigated

5.4. Vehicles

5.4.1. Construction Vehicle Control Strategies

5.5. Architectural Coatings

5.6. Dust Mitigation

5.6.1. Construction Earthmoving Activities

5.6.2. Construction Earthmoving Control Strategies

5.7. Construction Paving

5.8. Construction Electricity Consumption and Emissions Factors

8. User Changes to Default Data
Attachment A

Page 18 ends

Page 135 ends

Almond St Extension LST Custom Report, 5/9/2023
3 / 15

1. Basic Project Information

1.1. Basic Project Information
Data Field Value
Project Name Almond St Extension LST
Construction Start Date 8/19/2024
Lead Agency —
Land Use Scale Project/site
Analysis Level for Defaults County
Windspeed (m/s) 2.80
Precipitation (days) 12.0
Location 34.161985, -117.617861
County San Bernardino-South Coast
City Rancho Cucamonga
Air District South Coast AQMD
Air Basin South Coast
TAZ 5265
EDFZ 10
Electric Utility Southern California Edison
Gas Utility Southern California Gas
App Version 2022.1.1.12

Page 19 ends

Page 136 ends

Almond St Extension LST Custom Report, 5/9/2023
4 / 15

1.3. User-Selected Emission Reduction Measures by Emissions Sector No measures selected

3. Construction Emissions Details

Page 20 ends

Page 137 ends

Almond St Extension LST Custom Report, 5/9/2023
5 / 15
Demolitio — — — — — — < 0.005 < 0.005 — < 0.005 < 0.005 — — — — — — — Onsite
tr
uck

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 — 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Offsite — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Daily,
Summer
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker 0.02 0.02 < 0.005 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 3.21 3.21 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.40 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 2.88 2.88 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 3.04 Hauling 0.01 < 0.005 0.08 0.07 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 20.0 20.0 0.01 < 0.005 0.02 21.2 Daily,
Winter
(Max)
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Average
Daily
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.04 0.04 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.04 Hauling < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.27 0.27 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.29 Annual — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Worker < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.00 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 Vendor < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 — 0.01 0.01 < 0.005 < 0.005 < 0.005 0.01 Attachment A

Page 21 ends

Rancho Cucamonga City CouncilSeptember 4, 2024

Rancho Cucamonga City Council
September 4, 2024