Agenda packet — Rancho Cucamonga City Council, May 21, 2025 (part 1 of 3)

CITY COUNCIL VISION STATEMENT
“Our Vision is to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant city, rich in opportunity for all to thrive by building on our foundation and success as a world class community.”

Page 1 ends

Mayor
L. Dennis Michael

Mayor Pro Tem
Lynne B. Kennedy

Members of the City
Council:

Ryan A. Hutchison
Kristine D. Scott
Ashley Stickler

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
May 21, 2025
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730

FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT BOARD – CITY COUNCIL
HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY- SUCCESSOR AGENCY –

PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY

CLOSED SESSION

REGULAR MEETINGS

TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM

COUNCIL CHAMBERS
4:30 P.M.
7:00 P.M.

The City Council meets regularly on the first and third Wednesday of the month at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers located at 10500 Civic Center Drive. It is the intent to conclude the meeting by 10:00 p.m. unless extended by the concurrence of the City Council. Agendas, minutes, and recordings of meetings can be found at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas or by contacting the City Clerk Services Department at 909-774-2023. Live Broadcast available on Channel 3 (RCTV-3). For City Council Rules of Decorum refer to Resolution No. 2023-086.

Any documents distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on this agenda after distribution of the agenda packet will be made available in the City Clerk Services Department during normal business hours at City Hall located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730. In addition, such documents will be posted on the City’s website at https://www.cityofrc.us/your-government/city-council-agendas.

CLOSED SESSION – 4:30 P.M.

TAPIA CONFERENCE ROOM

ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler

A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS

Page 2 ends

D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION

D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES

DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, MATT BURRIS,

DEPUTY CITY MANAGER OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT/PLANNING, JEVIN KAYE, FINANCE DIRECTOR AND EMILY NIELSEN, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES BUSINESS PARTNER; PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274 AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. (CITY)

D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0227-121-56-0000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS ADDRESS 7089 ETIWANDA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730; AND PARCEL NUMBER 0227- 121-55-0000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS ADDRESS 7092 ETIWANDA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730 NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND RICHARD HAMM, REPRESENTING PELICAN COMMUNITIES, REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY)

D3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: HIMNEL USA, INC. D/B/A ST. MARY'S MONTESSORI SCHOOL AND GLOBAL PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC VS. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SBSC CASE NO.: CIVDS 2014554. (CITY)

D4. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (D) OF SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: THM ENTERPRISES LLC v. CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, SAN BERNARDINO SUPERIOR COURT CASE NO CIVRS 2501890. (CITY)

E. RECESS

Page 3 ends

REGULAR MEETING – 7:00 P.M.

COUNCIL CHAMBERS

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL: Mayor Michael
Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy
Council Members Hutchison, Scott and Stickler

A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA

B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS

C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

This is the time and place for the general public to address the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority Board, and City Council on any item listed or not listed on the agenda. State law prohibits us from addressing any issue not on the Agenda. Testimony may be received and referred to staff or scheduled for a future meeting.

Comments are to be limited to three (3) minutes per individual. All communications are to be addressed directly to the Fire Board, Agencies, Successor Agency, Authority Board, or City Council not to the members of the audience. This is a professional business meeting and courtesy and decorum are expected. Please refrain from any debate between audience and speaker, disorderly or boisterous conduct that disturbs, disrupts, or otherwise impedes the orderly conduct of the meeting. For more information, refer to the City Council Rules of Decorum and Order (Resolution No. 2023-086) located in the back of the Council Chambers.

The public communications period will not exceed one hour prior to the commencement of the business portion of the agenda. During this one hour period, all those who wish to speak on a topic contained in the business portion of the agenda will be given priority, and no further speaker cards for these business items (with the exception of public hearing items) will be accepted once the business portion of the agenda commences. Any other public communications which have not concluded during this one hour period may resume after the regular business portion of the agenda has been completed.

Page 4 ends

CONSENT CALENDARS:

The following Consent Calendar items are expected to be routine and noncontroversial. They will be acted upon without discussion unless an item is removed by Council Member for discussion.

Members of the City Council also sit as the Fire Board, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, and Public Finance Authority and may act on the consent calendar for those bodies as part of a single motion with the City Council consent calendar.

D. CONSENT CALENDAR

D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Regular and Special Meetings of May 7, 2025.

D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,272,289.17 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,602,233.66 Dated April 29, 2025, Through May 11,2025. (CITY/FIRE)

D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $3,131.32 Dated April 29, 2025, Through May 11, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)

D4. Consideration to Approve the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's Wildfire Mitigation Plan. (CITY)

D5. Consideration of an Additional Appropriation in the Amount of $289,160 from General Fund for Updated Costs to Phase 1 of the Stadium Modernization Project. (CITY)

D6. Consideration of the Amendment No. 02 to Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer, Rosenblit, & Litvak, LLP for Legal Services Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters, Extending the Term of the Agreement Through September 15, 2025. (CITY)

D7. Consideration to Award a Contract with Gentry Brothers Inc. in the Amount of $158,890, Plus a 10% Contingency of $15,890, for the Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard Storm Drain Project. This Project is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Per Government Code Section 15301(c)(1) - Existing Facilities. (CITY)

D8. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Engineering for Consulting Services on the City Electric System Infrastructure in the Amount of $172,800. (CITY)

D9. Consideration to Accept Public Improvements located on the North Side of Napa Street and 650 Feet East of Etiwanda Avenue per Improvement Agreement, Related to SUBTPM20251, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize the Release of Bonds. (CITY)

D10. Consideration of a Request for a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) to Permit Alcoholic Beverage Sales for Off-Site Consumption (Type-21 Off-Sale General) for an Approved Supermarket Located in the Corridor 1 (CO1) Zone at 9040 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0208-101-20. The Project Qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption Under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 – Existing Facilities (PCN DRC2025-00088). (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-019) (CITY)

D11. Consideration of Replacement Subdivision Improvement Agreements and Acceptance of Replacement Bonds for Final Maps of Tracts 16072-1, 16072-2, 16072-3, and 16072. (CITY)

D12. Consideration of Resolution No. 2025-018 Declaring Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that certain Real Property Owned by the City located at 8282, 8328, and 8378 Rochester Avenue is Surplus Land and Not Necessary for City’s Use, Finding that Such Declaration is Exempt from Environmental Review Under the California Environmental Quality Act, and Taking Related Actions. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-018) (CITY)

Page 5 ends

E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION

E1. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:

ORDINANCE NO. 1040
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 5.08.100

OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE LIMITATION ON TOTAL VALUE OF

PRIZES AWARDED DURING THE CONDUCT OF BINGO GAMES

F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)

F1. Consideration of Introduction and First Reading by Title Only of an Ordinance Designating Moderate, High and Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in the Local Responsibility Areas in Accordance with the California Fire Code and Government Code Section 51175-51189. (ORDINANCE NO. FD 059) (CITY/FIRE)

G. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS ITEM(S) - CITY/FIRE DISTRICT

G1. Public Hearing to Consider a Resolution for Placement of Special Assessments and Liens for Delinquent Solid Waste Accounts. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-017) (CITY)

G2. Public Hearing to Consider First Reading by Title Only of City Council Ordinance No. 1041, to Adopt Zoning Map Amendment DRC2025-00044 in Order to Change the Zoning Map Designation of Two Parcels Addressed 9750 and 9720 7th Street From Center 1 – Southwest Cucamonga (CE1-SC) to Neo-Industrial (NI), in Order to Correct an Inconsistency With the General Plan Land Use Map. This Project is Exempt from Environmental Review Under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b) (3), as the Proposed Zoning Map Amendment Will Not Have Any Direct Impact on the Environment. APNs: 0209-211-68, 0209-211-69. (ORDINANCE NO. 1041) (CITY)

G3. Public Hearing to Consider Adoption of 2025-2029 Consolidated Plan, 2025-2026 Annual Action Plan, and the Draft Citizen Participation Plan (CPP) for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. (CITY)

H. CITY MANAGER'S STAFF REPORT(S)

H1. Quarterly Development Update - First Quarter 2025. (CITY)

I. COUNCIL BUSINESS

I1. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS

(Comments to be limited to three minutes per Council Member.)

I2. INTERAGENCY UPDATES

(Update by the City Council to the community on the meetings that were attended.)

Page 6 ends

J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS

K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING

L. ADJOURNMENT

CERTIFICATION
I, Linda A. Troyan, MMC, City Clerk Services Director of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, or my designee, hereby certify under penalty of perjury that a true, accurate copy of the foregoing agenda was posted at least seventy-two (72) hours prior to the meeting per Government Code 54954.2 at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California and on the City's website.

LINDA A. TROYAN, MMC

CITY CLERK SERVICES DIRECTOR

If you need special assistance or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk Services Department at (909) 774-2023. Notification of 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility. Listening devices are available for the hearing impaired.

*DRAFT*

May 7, 2025 | City Council/Fire Special Meeting Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 1
May 7, 2025

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

CITY COUNCIL AND FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES

The City Council and Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District held a Special Workshop Meeting on Wednesday, May 7, 2025 in the Tri -Communities Conference Room , 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor/President L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER

Present were Council Members/Fire Board Members: Ryan Hutchison, Ashley Stickler , Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael; Absent: Kristine Scott.

Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa C. Cox, Assistant City Manager; Mike McCliman, Fire Chief; Rick Snawder, Fire Marshal ; Shane Adams , Deputy Fire Marshal; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney and Patricia Bravo-Valdez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services.

Assistant City Manager Cox led the Pledge of Allegiance.

A. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

No public communications were made.

B. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION

B1. Fire Board Study Session and Discussion on Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map Adoption. (Verbal Report) (FIRE)

City Manager Gillison introduced the item and Fire Chief Mike McCliman, Fire Marshal Rick Snawder, and Deputy Fire Marshal Shane Adams who provided a PowerPoint presentation on the scheduled Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map Adoption. Staff reviewed the map development process, proposed Fire Hazard Zones as identified by the State Fire Marshal, fire safe regulations and the map adoption timeline. The adoption process consists of a public comment period of thirty (30) days from April 8, 2025, the adoption period is 120 days from March 24, 2025, with a proposed effective date of January 1, 2026 . Discussion ensued on future public outreach methodologies, researching possible rebate opportunities for property owners, the map adoption process and hazard disclosure requirements for potential home buyers.

C. ADJOURNMENT

Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 3:35 p.m.

Approved:

Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director

Page 7 ends

*DRAFT*
May 7, 2025 | City Council Special Meeting Minutes
City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 1 of 1
May 7, 2025

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES

The City Council held a Special Meeting on Wednesday, May 7, 2025 in the Tri-Communities Conference Room, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor L. Dennis Michael called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.

CALL TO ORDER

Present were Council Members Ryan Hutchison, Ashley Stickler , Kristine Scott (arrived at 4:36 p.m.), Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.

Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager; Julie Sowles, Deputy City Manager of Community Programs; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney and Patricia Bravo-Valdez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services.

Community Services Director Jennifer Gracia led the Pledge of Allegiance.

A. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

No public communications were made.

B. ITEMS OF DISCUSSION

B1. Lewis Family Playhouse Programming Strategy. (Verbal Report) (CITY)

City Manager Gillison introduced the item and Jennifer Gracia, Community Services Director and Kevin Shimko, Community Services Superintendent , who provided a PowerPoint presentation on the Lewis Family Playhouse Programming Strategy including information on audience development, financial strategy, space utilization; and shared the programming schedule for the 2025/2026 season. Discussion ensued on expanding marketing opportunities and partnerships and developing standards and guidelines for future programming.

C. ADJOURNMENT

Mayor Michael adjourned the meeting at 4:57 p.m.

Approved:

Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director

Page 8 ends

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, HOUSING SUCCESSOR AGENCY, SUCCESSOR AGENCY,

PUBLIC FINANCE AUTHORITY AND CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETINGS MINUTES

The City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga held a Closed Session on Wednesday, May 7, 2025, in the Tapia Conference Room at the Civic Center, 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 5:00 PM.

Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.

Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager of Community Development/Planning, Julie Sowles, Deputy City Manager of Community Programs and Peter Castro, Deputy City Manager of Administrative Services.

A. ANNOUNCEMENT OF CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

B. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEM(S)

No public communications were made.

C. CITY MANAGER ANNOUNCEMENTS

D. CONDUCT OF CLOSED SESSION

D1. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS ROBERT NEIUBER, SENIOR HUMAN

RESOURCES DIRECTOR, PETER CASTRO, DEPUTY CITY

MANAGER/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, MATT BURRIS, DEPUTY CITY

MANAGER/ECONOMIC AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, JEVIN KAYE, FINANCE

DIRECTOR AND EMILY NIELSEN, SENIOR HUMAN RESOURCES BUSINESS PARTNER, PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54954.2 REGARDING LABOR

NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE FIRE SUPPORT SERVICES ASSOCIATION, RANCHO CUCAMONGA FIREFIGHTERS LOCAL 2274 AND TEAMSTERS LOCAL 1932. (CITY)

D2. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0229 -012-08- 0000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS ADDRESS 8434 ROCHESTER AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730; NEGOTIATING PARTIES MATT MARQUEZ, DIRECTOR OF

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND RICHARD LEE, REPRESENTING CBRE GROUP, INC., REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY)

D3. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0227 -121-56- 0000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS ADDRESS 7089 ETIWANDA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730; AND PARCEL NUMBER 0227 -121-55-0000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS ADDRESS 7092 ETIWANDA AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730

NEGOTIATING PARTIES JOHN GILLISON, CITY MANAGER, REPRESENTING THE

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND RICHARD HAMM, REPRESENTING PELICAN COMMUNITIES, REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY)

Page 9 ends

*DRAFT*
May 7, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 2 of 9

D4. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS PER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 FOR PROPERTY IDENTIFIED AS PARCEL NUMBER 0209 -272-27- 0000 COMMONLY KNOWN AS ADDRESS 9070 MILLIKEN AVENUE, RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730; NEGOTIATING PARTIES MATT MARQUEZ, DIRECTOR OF

PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, REPRESENTING THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA, AND CHRIS HYUN, REPRESENTING JRC REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT CORP, REGARDING PRICE AND TERMS. (CITY)

E. RECESS

The closed session recessed at 6:23 p.m.

Page 10 ends

The Regular meetings of the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority, and the City of Rancho Cucamonga City Council were held on May 7, 2025, in the Council Chambers at City Hall, located at 10500 Civic Center Drive, Rancho Cucamonga, California. Mayor Michael called the meeting to order at 7:00 PM.

Present were Council Members: Ryan Hutchison, Kristine Scott, Ashley Stickler, Mayor Pro Tem Lynne Kennedy and Mayor L. Dennis Michael.

Also present were: John Gillison, City Manager; Nicholas Ghirelli, City Attorney; and Patricia Bravo - Valdez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services.

Council Member Stickler led the Pledge of Allegiance.

A. AMENDMENTS TO THE AGENDA

None.

B. ANNOUNCEMENTS / PRESENTATIONS

B1. Presentation of Certificates of Recognition to the Etiwanda Girls Basketball Team for Winning the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) Championships.

Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented Certificates of Recognition to the Etiwanda Girls Basketball Team for winning the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) Championships and thanked them for their dedication and commitment.

B2. Presentation of a Proclamation to the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce Designating the Month of May 2025 as Business Appreciation Month.

Mayor Michael and Members of the City Council presented a Proclamation to the Rancho Cucamonga Chamber of Commerce declaring the month of May 2025 as Business Appreciation Month .

C. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS

Carlos Arce, introduced himself as District 25 representative for the Office of Senator Sasha Renée Pérez.

John Baugh, Connect RC Bicycle Subcommittee Member, spoke in opposition of Ordinance No. 1039, specifying his opposition of Section E of Ordinance No. 1039.

Grace Moreno, California State Polytechnic University student, spoke about a petition she is working on as her final project to raise awareness and funds for safe housing/domestic violence shelters in San Bernardino County.

David Dykstra, displayed a Martin Luther King Jr. quote and spoke about political issues.

Page 11 ends

Council Member Scott abstained on item D3, due to a potential conflict of interest as her employer is Southern California Gas Company.

D1. Consideration to Approve the Minutes of the Regular and Special Meetings of April 16, 2025.

D2. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi -Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,272,289.17 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $8,448,632.60 Dated April 07, 2025, Through April 28, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)

D3. Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $27,090.17 Dated April 07, 2025, Through April 28, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)

D4. Consideration to Receive and File Current Investment Schedules as of March 31, 2025 for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District. (CITY/FIRE)

D5. Consideration to Cancel and Reschedule the September 17, 2025 Regular Meetings of the Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Financing Authority, and City Council to September 16, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)

D6. Consideration to Declare Surplus for Retired VHF Mobile Radio That Have Been Deemed No Longer Needed, Obsolete or Unusable as Surplus. (FIRE)

D7. Consideration for the Transfer of Title for One (1) 2025 Honda Pioneer 1000 Side -by-Side, Procured from Huntington Beach Honda, to Facilitate the Vehicles' Use by the County of San Bernardino for Police Department Services. (CITY)

D8. Consideration of a Contract with Mukai Construction for the Quakes Stadium Bowl Emergency Waterproofing in the Amount of $427,220. (CITY)

D9. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement With Z&K Consultants, Inc. in the Amount of $409,400, Plus 10% Contingency for Construction Management and Inspection Services for the Heritage Park Bridge Replacement Project. (CITY)

D10. Consideration of Amendment No. 15 to the Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. (CO19-085) in the Amount of $295,000 for High Voltage Electrical Support and Related Infrastructure. (CITY)

D11. Consideration of an Approval of Amendment No. 5 to the Agreement with Henkels & McCoy, Inc. (CO19 -148) and Amendment No. 16 to the Agreement with Pacific Utility Installation, Inc. (CO19 -085) in the Amount of $780,600, Plus a 10% Contingency and an Authorization to Appropriate $858,660 for the Municipal Utility Connector Replacement Project. (CITY)

D12. Consideration to Adopt a Resolution Allocating Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Program Funds for Fiscal Year 2025/26. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025 -012) (CITY)

Page 12 ends

*DRAFT*
May 7, 2025 | Fire Protection District, Housing Successor Agency, Successor Agency, Public Finance Authority and City Council Regular Meetings Minutes City of Rancho Cucamonga | Page 5 of 9
D13. Consideration of Resolutions Declaring Portions of City -Owned Properties Located North of Foothill Boulevard Approximately 725 Feet East of Grove Avenue, Exempt Surplus Land and Not Necessary for the City’s Use Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221(f)(1)(B), Finding that Such Declaration is Exempt from Environmental Review Under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and Making Related Findings. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-015 AND RESOLUTION NO. 2025-016) (CITY)

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Stickler, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to approve Consent Calendar items D1 through D13, with Council Member/Board Member Scott abstaining on item D3. Motion carried 5-0.

E. CONSENT CALENDAR ORDINANCE(S) - SECOND READING/ADOPTION

E1. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:

ORDINANCE NO. 1038

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 3.80 TO THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE, ESTABLISHING

A DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FOR FIRE IMPACTS OF RESIDENTIAL AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT, AMENDING CHAPTER 3.68 TO REMOVE REFERENCES

TO QUIMBY ACT IN LIEU FEES, AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF EXEMPTION

FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

E2. Consideration of Second Reading and Adoption of the Following:

ORDINANCE NO. 1039

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 10.84 TO TITLE 10 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE

REGULATING THE USE OF BICYCLES AND E-CONVEYANCES IN PUBLIC AREAS

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Stickler, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to waive full reading and adopt Ordinance Nos. 1038 and 1039 by title only.

Patricia Bravo-Valdez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services , read the titles of Ordinance Nos. 1038 and 1039.

VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Stickler, seconded by Council Member Hutchison, to waive full readings and adopt Ordinance Nos. 10 38 and 1039 by title only. Motion carried 5-

0. F. ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING ITEM(S)

F1. Consideration of Introduction and First Reading by Title Only of Ordinance No. 1040, an Ordinance of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, Amending Section 5.08.100 of the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code to Amend the Limitation on Total Value of Prizes Awarded During the Conduct of Bingo Games. This Action is Not Considered a Project Under CEQA (California Environmental Quality Act) and is Therefore Exempt from Further Environmental Review. (ORDINANCE NO. 1040) (CITY)

City Manager Gillison introduced Jonathan Hilton, Management Analyst I and Jenelle Markel, Community Services Supervisor, who gave a staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item F1.

Mayor Michael opened the Administrative Hearing.

Page 13 ends

Mayor Michael closed the Administrative Hearing.

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Stickler, to introduce the First Reading of Ordinance No. 1040 by title only, and waive further reading.

Patricia Bravo-Valdez, MMC, Deputy Director of City Clerk Services, read the title of Ordinance No. 1040.

ORDINANCE NO. 1040

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION

5.08.100 OF THE RANCHO CUCAMONGA MUNICIPAL CODE TO AMEND THE LIMITATION ON

TOTAL VALUE OF PRIZES AWARDED DURING THE CONDUCT OF BINGO GAMES

VOTES NOW CAST ON MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Council Member Stickler, to introduce the First Reading of Ordinance No. 1040 by title only, and waive further reading .

Motion carried 5-0.

F2. Consideration of a Resolution to Create a Residential Permit Parking District on Salerno Place, Pursuant to Municipal Code Section 10.50. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-013) (CITY) City Manager Gillison introduced Chris Ellis, Assistant Engineer, and Alberto Felix, Traffic Engineer, who gave the staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item F2.

Mayor Michael opened the Administrative Hearing.

There were no public communications.

Mayor Michael closed the Administrative Hearing.

Discussion ensued on current parking restrictions in the area and proposed parking opportunities for residents and their guests.

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Stickler, seconded by Council Member Scott, to adopt City Resolution No. 2025-013. Motion carried 5-0.

Page 14 ends

G1. Public Hearing for Consideration of Resolution No. 2025 -014, A Resolution of the City Council of Rancho Cucamonga, California, Approving a Development Impact Fee Nexus Study for the Transportation Impact Fee, Adopting a Capital Improvement Program as Part of the Nexus Study, Establishing the Fee Amount, and Making a Determination of Exemption Under CEQA. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-014) (CITY)

City Manager Gillison introduced Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager of Community Development, Jason Welday, Engineering Services Director/City Engineer, and Zack Neighbors, Building and Safety Services Director who gave the staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation for item G1. Deputy City Manager Burris informed staff provided a Memo regarding DIF Calculations of Etiwanda Grade Separation (EGS) Contributions submitted by Fehr & Peers and one (1) letter of opposition was received by Carlos Rodriguez, Chief Policy Officer for the Building Industry Association of Southern California.

Copies of the memo and correspondence received were provided to the City Council and were available for the public to review and on the City’s website.

City Attorney Ghirelli addressed comments received by the Building Industry Association of Southern California. He addressed noticing requirements, public review periods, modifications made to the Nexus study, revisions/clarifications regarding fees, typographical error correction of a statutory number in the Nexus study, removal of footnote 12 to avoid ambiguity about what the statute means , Mitigation Fee Act requirements, referenced Nolan and Dolan case that deal t with the requirements for exactions by local government, provided clarifications on why the Nexus study did not have a zone based approach and spoke of applicable CEQA exemptions for the CIP and Nexus study.

City Engineer Welday addressed comments and technical questions submitted by the Building Industry Association of Southern California . He addressed the use of a transportation system that mitigates impacts and provides the necessary infrastructure to serve new development , informed service level requirements remained the same in the Nexus study and clarified the Resolution included the amendment to amend existing Capital Improvement Program (CIP). City Engineer Welday noted the Nexus study includes evidence used to make assumptions for the study and calculations including published data, industry standard systems such as the countywide travel demand model, and the use of professional engineering judgment. Lastly, he spoke of Nexus study funding strategies and the Fehr & Peers analysis regarding the Etiwanda Avenue Grade Separation Project.

Sarah Brandenberg , Principal, Fehr & Peers , informed Fehr & Peers prepared the Nexus study and determined the fair share proportion for the Etiwanda Avenue Grade Separation Project . She informed the firm looked at the total volume that would be using the grade separation facility in the future, and then looked at that portion of the volume that exceeded the current capacity of the roadway. She noted that's where the 77% that could be charged to future development was calculated and instead, the Nexus study took a more conservative approach and is applying a 60% cost to new development.

City Engineer Welday elaborated on the regional travel demand model used to incorporate the latest General Plan for Rancho Cucamonga.

Council Member Hutchison referenced a letter from Rotan & Tucker regarding the failure to properly account for other non-fee funding sources and asked what would happen in the event that Council adopts this fee schedule and the City receives grant money for a big project like the Etiwanda Avenue Grade Separation Project , thereby putting the City over and above the amount needed to be collected. He inquired what would happen to the DIF fees paid that may no longer be needed.

In response, City Engineer Welday stated the DIF fee program is designed for some projects to come in over and some to come in under and each major update to the program would take those scenarios into consideration to determine lowering or raising the cost of the program.

Page 15 ends

Tim McGinnis, Lewis Group of Companies, thanked city staff for working with the Building Industry over the last several months. He provided comments regarding project deficiencies and spoke about the memo regarding DIF Calculations of Etiwanda Grade Separation (EGS) contributions submitted by Fehr & Peers . He noted their calculations for percentage increase in new traffic for the Etiwanda Grade Separation project is 38%, not 77% as calculated by Fehr & Peers.

Carlos Rodriguez, Chief Policy Officer for the Building Industry Association of Southern California, thanked city staff for working with the Building Industry and expressed the BIA’s strong opposition to the City's proposed transportation Development Impact Fee proposal. He stated the BIA’s objection to the inclusion of the Etiwanda Grade Separation project in the DIF project list, the zoning based cost allocation model proposed and the City's use of Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as a metric in the Nexus study.

Lastly, he recommended capping the contingency costs for projects in the DIF at no more than 25% unless actual costs exceed this threshold, at which point this study could be revisited and updated accordingly.

Geoff Smith, Vice President, Forward Planning at Lennar Homes , thanked city staff for their time , effort, collaboration, and engagement with stakeholders on the topic and for working on an implementation plan with Lennar Homes.

Mayor Michael closed the Public Hearing.

Deputy City Manager Burris provided clarifications in response to public comment regarding calculations for the Etiwanda Grade Separation project.

Discussion ensued on the following topics: collaborative efforts of city staff and stakeholders, ratios and calculations presented in Nexus study regarding the Etiwanda Grade Separation project , future growth supporting itself financially to not place a burden on our existing residents or taxpayers , maintaining existing level of service for existing and new residents, the use of Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as a metric, local control, housing needs, item discussions starting in 2023 and continuing into 2025, and that current outdated fees need to keep up with the rising cost as well as the impact to ensure that our quality of life, services, amenities, infrastructure, public safety is sustainable.

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Hutchison to approve staff’s recommendation excluding the cost sharing requirement of the Etiwanda Grade Separation project , to allow staff additional time to work with stakeholders and bring back the cost sharing requirement of the Etiwanda Grade Separation project for consideration at a future meeting. Motion failed due to lack of a second.

MOTION: Moved by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, seconded by Council Member Stickler, to approve Resolution No. 2025-014. Motion carried 5-0.

Page 16 ends

None.

I. COUNCIL BUSINESS

I1. Consideration to Approve the City Council's Mission, Vision, Values, and 2025 Goals. (CITY)

City Manager Gillison introduced Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager, who gave a staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation.

Council Members thanked staff for bringing the City Council together for a day of teambuilding and giving the City Council and staff an opportunity to collaborate and solidify its Mission, Vision and Values, and discuss 2025 Goals.

MOTION: Moved by Council Member Scott, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy, to approve the City Council's Mission, Vision, Values, and 2025 Goals. Motion carried, 5-0.

I2. COUNCIL ANNOUNCEMENTS

Council Member Hutchison announced he and Mayor Pro Tem Kennedy attended a Public Works Subcommittee meeting on April 29, 2025 to review and discuss the solid waste rate adjustment request proposed by the City’s franchise waste hauler, and noted his recent attendance at a Solid Waste Advisory Task-Force (SWAT) committee meeting for San Bernardino County where he received an industry update.

I3. INTERAGENCY UPDATES

None.

J. CITY ATTORNEY ITEMS

City Attorney Ghirelli noted that there was no reportable action taken during Closed Session held earlier that evening.

K. IDENTIFICATION OF ITEMS FOR NEXT MEETING

None.

L. ADJOURNMENT

Mayor Michael adjourned the Council Meeting at 8:50 p.m.

Approved:

Linda A. Troyan, MMC
City Clerk Services Director

Page 17 ends

DATE:May 21, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Bi-Weekly Payroll in the Total Amount of $2,272,289.17 and City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers (Excluding Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company) in the Total Amount of $2,602,233.66 Dated April 29, 2025, Through May 11,2025. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Bi-weekly payroll is $1,307,135.46 and $965,153.71 for the City and the Fire District, respectively. Weekly check register amounts are $2,282,082.63 and $320,151.03 for the City and the Fire District, respectively.

BACKGROUND:

N/A

ANALYSIS:

N/A

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register

Page 18 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 1 of 14 ends

Company: City of Rancho Cucamonga
Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District
Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Rancho Cucamonga Payment Date On or After: 04/29/2025
Payment Date On or Before: 05/11/2025
Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Gentry General
Engineering Inc: 04/29/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
04/29/2025 Gentry General
Engineering Inc
140,085.21 0 140,085.21
Supplier Payment: Northtown
Housing Development Corp:
04/29/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451625 04/29/2025 Northtown Housing
Development Corp
11,598.44 0 11,598.44
Supplier Payment: Vulcan Materials
Company: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451687 05/01/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 724.72 0 724.72 Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County: 05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451673 05/01/2025 San Bernardino County 0 18,122.00 18,122.00 Supplier Payment: Assi Security:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Assi Security 74,265.80 0 74,265.80
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451679 05/01/2025 Southern California Edison 0 186.42 186.42 Supplier Payment: Inland Presort &
Mailing Services: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451660 05/01/2025 Inland Presort & Mailing
Services
1,597.92 0 1,597.92
Supplier Payment: Husky Boy
Corporation: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451657 05/01/2025 Husky Boy Corporation 5,325.00 0 5,325.00 Supplier Payment: Franklin Truck
Parts Inc: 05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451648 05/01/2025 Franklin Truck Parts Inc 0 13.62 13.62 Supplier Payment: Brightview
Landscape Services Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Brightview Landscape
Services Inc
52,960.06 0 52,960.06
Supplier Payment: Grainger:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451651 05/01/2025 Grainger 1,250.47 0 1,250.47
Supplier Payment: Sharon Ott:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Sharon Ott 2,706.00 0 2,706.00
Supplier Payment: Universal Fleet
Supply: 05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451685 05/01/2025 Universal Fleet Supply 0 1,099.84 1,099.84 Supplier Payment: Unity Courier
Service Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451684 05/01/2025 Unity Courier Service Inc 992.25 0 992.25 Supplier Payment: Concept Powder
Coating: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451638 05/01/2025 Concept Powder Coating 290.00 0 290.00 ATTACHMENT 1

Page 19 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 2 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Merrimac
Petroleum Inc: 05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
05/01/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 0 21,768.19 21,768.19 Supplier Payment: Rdo Equipment
Company: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Rdo Equipment Company 442.62 0 442.62
Supplier Payment: Richards Watson
& Gershon: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Richards Watson &
Gershon
44,725.57 0 44,725.57
Supplier Payment: Nv5 Inc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451667 05/01/2025 Nv5 Inc 20,957.60 0 20,957.60
Supplier Payment: Hernandez Group
Llc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451654 05/01/2025 Hernandez Group Llc 1,786.54 0 1,786.54 Supplier Payment: Robert Morales:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451672 05/01/2025 Robert Morales 596.40 0 596.40
Supplier Payment: Cintas
Corporation: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451635 05/01/2025 Cintas Corporation 3,385.70 0 3,385.70 Supplier Payment: Sovic Creative:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Sovic Creative 4,500.00 0 4,500.00
Supplier Payment: Tirehub Llc:
05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451681 05/01/2025 Tirehub Llc 0 279.24 279.24
Supplier Payment: Cameron
Welding: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451632 05/01/2025 Cameron Welding 132.19 0 132.19
Supplier Payment: Bsn Sports Llc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Bsn Sports Llc 377.13 0 377.13
Supplier Payment: Clean Slate
Group Llc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451637 05/01/2025 Clean Slate Group Llc 9,753.00 0 9,753.00 Supplier Payment: Aufbau
Corporation: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Aufbau Corporation 6,811.00 0 6,811.00
Supplier Payment: Yunex Llc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Yunex Llc 1,471.65 0 1,471.65
Supplier Payment: Environment
Planning Dvmt Solutions: 05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451644 05/01/2025 Environment Planning
Dvmt Solutions
0 9,742.10 9,742.10
Supplier Payment: Daisyeco Inc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Daisyeco Inc 77.00 0 77.00
Supplier Payment: Ontario Ice
Skating Center: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451669 05/01/2025 Ontario Ice Skating Center 980.00 0 980.00 Supplier Payment: Jade Michael
Anne Sigurdson: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451662 05/01/2025 Jade Michael Anne
Sigurdson
1,320.00 0 1,320.00
Supplier Payment: Gateway Pet
Cemetery & Crematory: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451650 05/01/2025 Gateway Pet Cemetery &
Crematory
1,070.00 0 1,070.00

Page 20 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 3 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Trueline
Construction & Surfacing Inc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451683 05/01/2025 Trueline Construction &
Surfacing Inc
51,777.60 0 51,777.60
Supplier Payment: Richards Watson
& Gershon: 05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
05/01/2025 Richards Watson &
Gershon
0 1,411.30 1,411.30
Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory
Printing Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451652 05/01/2025 Graphics Factory Printing
Inc
148.16 0 148.16
Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Psa Print Group 215.75 0 215.75
Supplier Payment: New Urban Realty
Advisors: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451665 05/01/2025 New Urban Realty
Advisors
3,191.39 0 3,191.39
Supplier Payment: Dlr Group Inc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Dlr Group Inc 27,900.00 0 27,900.00
Supplier Payment: Direct Lighting
Manufacturing: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451643 05/01/2025 Direct Lighting
Manufacturing
2,068.80 0 2,068.80
Supplier Payment: Federal Express
Corp: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451645 05/01/2025 Federal Express Corp 46.67 0 46.67
Supplier Payment: South Coast
Aqmd: 05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451678 05/01/2025 South Coast Aqmd 0 541.04 541.04
Supplier Payment: Shoeteria Inc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Shoeteria Inc 355.00 0 355.00
Supplier Payment: Cfed: 05/01/2025 Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451633 05/01/2025 Cfed 0 1,190.00 1,190.00
Supplier Payment: The Remy
Corporation: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451680 05/01/2025 The Remy Corporation 28,380.00 0 28,380.00 Supplier Payment: Fire Apparatus
Solutions: 05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451647 05/01/2025 Fire Apparatus Solutions 0 571.65 571.65 Supplier Payment: Cr&A Custom Inc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451640 05/01/2025 Cr&A Custom Inc 23,956.80 0 23,956.80 Supplier Payment: Velocity Truck
Centers: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451686 05/01/2025 Velocity Truck Centers 180.28 0 180.28 Supplier Payment: Hci Environmental
& Engineering Svc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Hci Environmental &
Engineering Svc
2,655.00 0 2,655.00
Supplier Payment: Loretta S. van der
Pol: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451663 05/01/2025 Loretta S. van der Pol 750.00 0 750.00 Supplier Payment: Ra Batchelor Co:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451671 05/01/2025 Ra Batchelor Co 3,900.00 0 3,900.00
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Napa Auto Parts 482.38 0 482.38

Page 21 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 4 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Holliday Rock Co
Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451655 05/01/2025 Holliday Rock Co Inc 925.57 0 925.57
Supplier Payment: Pre-Paid Legal
Services Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451670 05/01/2025 Pre-Paid Legal Services
Inc
191.54 0 191.54
Supplier Payment: Henry Schein Inc:
05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451653 05/01/2025 Henry Schein Inc 0 962.28 962.28
Supplier Payment: Alliant Insurance
Services Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Alliant Insurance Services
Inc
42,005.00 0 42,005.00
Supplier Payment: Cobra
Professionals, INC.: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Cobra Professionals, INC. 614.40 0 614.40
Supplier Payment: Westrux
International Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451689 05/01/2025 Westrux International Inc 1,684.81 0 1,684.81 Supplier Payment: Cucamonga
Valley Water District: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451641 05/01/2025 Cucamonga Valley Water
District
8,160.09 0 8,160.09
Supplier Payment: Dunn-Edwards
Corporation: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Dunn-Edwards Corporation 1,435.24 0 1,435.24 Supplier Payment: Nick'S Custom
Boots Llc: 05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451666 05/01/2025 Nick'S Custom Boots Llc 0 747.75 747.75 Supplier Payment: Bluespace
Interiors: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451630 05/01/2025 Bluespace Interiors 30,362.42 0 30,362.42 Supplier Payment: Inland Empire
Property Service Inc: 05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451659 05/01/2025 Inland Empire Property
Service Inc
0 277.50 277.50
Supplier Payment: Psa Print Group:
05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
05/01/2025 Psa Print Group 0 161.81 161.81
Supplier Payment: Alma Arocho:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451626 05/01/2025 Alma Arocho 1,065.60 0 1,065.60
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts:
05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
05/01/2025 Napa Auto Parts 0 3,128.20 3,128.20
Supplier Payment: Ignite Culture Inc:
05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451658 05/01/2025 Ignite Culture Inc 0 2,575.85 2,575.85 Supplier Payment: C P Generator
Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451639 05/01/2025 C P Generator Inc 204.73 0 204.73
Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451668 05/01/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 3,052.93 0 3,052.93 Supplier Payment: Siteone
Landscape Supply Llc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451675 05/01/2025 Siteone Landscape Supply
Llc

87.19 0 87.19

Page 22 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 5 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Ninyo & Moore:
05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
05/01/2025 Ninyo & Moore 0 9,182.50 9,182.50
Supplier Payment: Ameron Pole
Products Llc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451627 05/01/2025 Ameron Pole Products Llc 54,389.55 0 54,389.55 Supplier Payment: Cameron-Daniel
Pc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451631 05/01/2025 Cameron-Daniel Pc 201.00 0 201.00
Supplier Payment: Itron Inc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451661 05/01/2025 Itron Inc 1,494.00 0 1,494.00
Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric
Company Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Graybar Electric Company
Inc
1,117.68 0 1,117.68
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451649 05/01/2025 Frontier Comm 0 92.33 92.33
Supplier Payment: Charter
Communications: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451634 05/01/2025 Charter Communications 8,433.19 0 8,433.19 Supplier Payment: Nbs: 05/01/2025 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451664 05/01/2025 Nbs 832.50 0 832.50
Supplier Payment: Mariposa
Landscapes Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 45,511.87 0 45,511.87 Supplier Payment: Johnny Allen
Tennis Academy: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Johnny Allen Tennis
Academy
3,225.60 0 3,225.60
Supplier Payment: Scott Mcleod
Plumbing Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451674 05/01/2025 Scott Mcleod Plumbing Inc 89,606.00 0 89,606.00 Supplier Payment: Towill Inc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451682 05/01/2025 Towill Inc 10,406.00 0 10,406.00
Supplier Payment: Citrus Motors
Ontario Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451636 05/01/2025 Citrus Motors Ontario Inc 37.41 0 37.41 Supplier Payment: Apx Inc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451628 05/01/2025 Apx Inc 2,702.25 0 2,702.25
Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary
Supply: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451688 05/01/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 12,007.44 0 12,007.44 Supplier Payment: Ferguson
Enterprises Llc #1350: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451646 05/01/2025 Ferguson Enterprises Llc
#1350
121.58 0 121.58
Supplier Payment: C V W D:
05/01/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451642 05/01/2025 C V W D 0 256.21 256.21
Supplier Payment: Interwest
Consulting Group Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Interwest Consulting Group
Inc
2,877.87 0 2,877.87
Supplier Payment: Hose-Man Inc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451656 05/01/2025 Hose-Man Inc 717.65 0 717.65
Supplier Payment: Bishop Company:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451629 05/01/2025 Bishop Company 86.19 0 86.19

Page 23 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 6 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451693 05/01/2025 Frontier Comm 2,399.77 0 2,399.77
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451694 05/01/2025 Southern California Edison 9,239.31 0 9,239.31 Supplier Payment: Dlr Group Inc:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/01/2025 Dlr Group Inc 27,000.00 0 27,000.00
Supplier Payment: Adapt Consulting
Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451690 05/01/2025 Adapt Consulting Inc 2,146.50 0 2,146.50 Supplier Payment: West End Material
Supply: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451696 05/01/2025 West End Material Supply 79.97 0 79.97 Supplier Payment: C V W D:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451691 05/01/2025 C V W D 34,921.22 0 34,921.22
Supplier Payment: Fleetcrew:
05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451692 05/01/2025 Fleetcrew 850.00 0 850.00
Supplier Payment: Tripepi Smith &
Associates Inc: 05/01/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451695 05/01/2025 Tripepi Smith & Associates
Inc
5,500.00 0 5,500.00
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 05/06/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451712 05/06/2025 Southern California Edison 111,128.77 0 111,128.77 Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451821 05/08/2025 Frontier Comm 8,569.54 0 8,569.54
Supplier Payment: Colts Landscape
Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451819 05/08/2025 Colts Landscape Inc 59,955.84 0 59,955.84 Supplier Payment: Sycamore Villa
Mobile Home Park: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451824 05/08/2025 Sycamore Villa Mobile
Home Park
200.00 0 200.00
Supplier Payment: The Groves On
Foothill: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451825 05/08/2025 The Groves On Foothill 200.00 0 200.00 Supplier Payment: Cintas
Corporation: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451818 05/08/2025 Cintas Corporation 0 1,281.88 1,281.88 Supplier Payment: C V W D:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451820 05/08/2025 C V W D 46,169.88 0 46,169.88
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Edison: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451823 05/08/2025 Southern California Edison 16,500.21 0 16,500.21 Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory
Printing Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451822 05/08/2025 Graphics Factory Printing
Inc
599.63 0 599.63
Supplier Payment: Frontier Comm:
05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451744 05/08/2025 Frontier Comm 0 841.36 841.36
Supplier Payment: Private Brand
Mfg: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Private Brand Mfg 857.91 0 857.91
Supplier Payment: Jorry Keith:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Jorry Keith 30.00 0 30.00

Page 24 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 7 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Reach Media
Network: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451787 05/08/2025 Reach Media Network 800.00 0 800.00
Supplier Payment: All City
Management Services Inc:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 All City Management
Services Inc
19,533.75 0 19,533.75
Supplier Payment: Executive Detail
Services: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451740 05/08/2025 Executive Detail Services 0 420.00 420.00 Supplier Payment: Hdl Coren &
Cone: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451749 05/08/2025 Hdl Coren & Cone 5,272.50 0 5,272.50
Supplier Payment: Prime Glass:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451783 05/08/2025 Prime Glass 406.62 0 406.62
Supplier Payment: Universal Fleet
Supply: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451807 05/08/2025 Universal Fleet Supply 0 60.22 60.22
Supplier Payment: Aquabio
Environmental Technologies Inc:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451718 05/08/2025 Aquabio Environmental
Technologies Inc
1,742.94 0 1,742.94
Supplier Payment: Assi Security:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Assi Security 3,000.00 0 3,000.00
Supplier Payment: Airgas Usa Llc:
05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451715 05/08/2025 Airgas Usa Llc 0 487.33 487.33
Supplier Payment: Uline: 05/08/2025 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451805 05/08/2025 Uline 9,053.10 0 9,053.10
Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451776 05/08/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 0 747.15 747.15 Supplier Payment: Ccs Orange
County Janitorial Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451724 05/08/2025 Ccs Orange County
Janitorial Inc
211.76 0 211.76
Supplier Payment: Icma: 05/08/2025 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451755 05/08/2025 Icma 1,200.00 0 1,200.00
Supplier Payment: Inyo Networks
Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451759 05/08/2025 Inyo Networks Inc 11,119.50 0 11,119.50 Supplier Payment: Mariposa
Landscapes Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Mariposa Landscapes Inc 199,735.07 0 199,735.07 Supplier Payment: Factory Motor
Parts: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451742 05/08/2025 Factory Motor Parts 0 248.65 248.65
Supplier Payment: D & K Concrete
Company: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451733 05/08/2025 D & K Concrete Company 3,886.56 0 3,886.56 Supplier Payment: Mc Wil Sports
Surfaces Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451768 05/08/2025 Mc Wil Sports Surfaces Inc 16,800.00 0 16,800.00

Page 25 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 8 of 14 ends

58.90 0 58.90
Supplier Payment: Whittier Fertilizer:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451813 05/08/2025 Whittier Fertilizer 905.10 0 905.10
Supplier Payment: Merrimac
Petroleum Inc: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
05/08/2025 Merrimac Petroleum Inc 0 2,305.60 2,305.60
Supplier Payment: Covetrus North
America: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451731 05/08/2025 Covetrus North America 3,753.24 0 3,753.24 Supplier Payment: Patton Sales
Corp: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451781 05/08/2025 Patton Sales Corp 452.55 0 452.55
Supplier Payment: Southern
California Mountains Foundation:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451796 05/08/2025 Southern California
Mountains Foundation
129,965.03 0 129,965.03
Supplier Payment: Vca Central
Animal Hospital: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451808 05/08/2025 Vca Central Animal
Hospital
543.70 0 543.70
Supplier Payment: Dance Terrific:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451734 05/08/2025 Dance Terrific 157.50 0 157.50
Supplier Payment: Bpr Consulting
Group Llc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451721 05/08/2025 Bpr Consulting Group Llc 328.74 0 328.74 Supplier Payment: Pacific Parking
Systems Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451779 05/08/2025 Pacific Parking Systems
Inc
955.00 0 955.00
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 San Bernardino County 35.00 0 35.00
Supplier Payment: Willdan Group:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451814 05/08/2025 Willdan Group 4,151.79 0 4,151.79
Supplier Payment: Pedrag V. Pecic:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Pedrag V. Pecic 3,000.00 0 3,000.00
Supplier Payment: Social Vocational
Services: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451794 05/08/2025 Social Vocational Services 5,717.25 0 5,717.25 Supplier Payment: Happyornot
Americas Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451748 05/08/2025 Happyornot Americas Inc 175.23 0 175.23 Supplier Payment: Musicland:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Musicland 119.00 0 119.00
Supplier Payment: Experian:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451741 05/08/2025 Experian 50.00 0 50.00

Page 26 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 9 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Fire Apparatus
Solutions: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451743 05/08/2025 Fire Apparatus Solutions 0 3,506.70 3,506.70 Supplier Payment: Kaiser Foundation
Health Plan Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451760 05/08/2025 Kaiser Foundation Health
Plan Inc
270,884.94 0 270,884.94
Supplier Payment: Fuel Serv:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451745 05/08/2025 Fuel Serv 5,656.06 0 5,656.06
Supplier Payment: Pumpman Llc:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451784 05/08/2025 Pumpman Llc 8,739.88 0 8,739.88
Supplier Payment: Vulcan Materials
Company: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451810 05/08/2025 Vulcan Materials Company 1,382.29 0 1,382.29 Supplier Payment: Zumar Industries
Inc.: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451817 05/08/2025 Zumar Industries Inc. 8,650.85 0 8,650.85 Supplier Payment: Shred Pros:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451792 05/08/2025 Shred Pros 135.00 0 135.00
Supplier Payment: Braun Blaising &
Wynne Pc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451722 05/08/2025 Braun Blaising & Wynne
Pc
1,180.00 0 1,180.00
Supplier Payment: Onward
Engineering: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451778 05/08/2025 Onward Engineering 2,970.00 0 2,970.00 Supplier Payment: Moon Coin
Productions, Inc.: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451771 05/08/2025 Moon Coin Productions,
Inc.
14,008.27 0 14,008.27
Supplier Payment: Data Ticket Inc:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Data Ticket Inc 5,590.19 0 5,590.19
Supplier Payment: Idexx Distribution
Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451756 05/08/2025 Idexx Distribution Inc 1,100.02 0 1,100.02 Supplier Payment: Civic Solutions
Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Civic Solutions Inc 9,805.00 0 9,805.00
Supplier Payment: Unity Courier
Service Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451806 05/08/2025 Unity Courier Service Inc 333.35 0 333.35 Supplier Payment: Mcmaster-Carr
Supply Company: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451767 05/08/2025 Mcmaster-Carr Supply
Company
418.55 0 418.55
Supplier Payment: Hill'S Pet Nutrition
Sales Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451751 05/08/2025 Hill'S Pet Nutrition Sales
Inc
2,293.74 0 2,293.74
Supplier Payment: Yunex Llc:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Yunex Llc 22,762.50 0 22,762.50
Supplier Payment: Enko Systems
Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451737 05/08/2025 Enko Systems Inc 1,447.88 0 1,447.88
Supplier Payment: Graybar Electric
Company Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Graybar Electric Company
Inc
8,536.06 0 8,536.06
Supplier Payment: Animal Health
Diagnostic Center: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451716 05/08/2025 Animal Health Diagnostic
Center

84.50 0 84.50
Supplier Payment: Wilson & Bell
Auto Service: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451816 05/08/2025 Wilson & Bell Auto Service 160.00 0 160.00

Page 27 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 10 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Mwi Animal
Health: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451773 05/08/2025 Mwi Animal Health 2,071.30 0 2,071.30 Supplier Payment: The Counseling
Team International: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451801 05/08/2025 The Counseling Team
International
0 2,730.00 2,730.00
Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
Cty Fire Protection Dist: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451791 05/08/2025 San Bernardino Cty Fire
Protection Dist
465.00 0 465.00
Supplier Payment: Humane Society
Of San Bernardino Valley:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451754 05/08/2025 Humane Society Of San
Bernardino Valley
267.00 0 267.00
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts:
05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
05/08/2025 Napa Auto Parts 0 60.58 60.58
Supplier Payment: Ginger Dollarhide:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Ginger Dollarhide 171.60 0 171.60
Supplier Payment: Thompson
Building Materials: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451803 05/08/2025 Thompson Building
Materials
1,954.05 0 1,954.05
Supplier Payment: Karen Clark:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451761 05/08/2025 Karen Clark 1,200.00 0 1,200.00
Supplier Payment: The Sign Shop:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451802 05/08/2025 The Sign Shop 98.59 0 98.59
Supplier Payment: Imagetrend Llc -
Remit-To: 1305 Corporate Ctr Dr:
05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451757 05/08/2025 Imagetrend Llc 0 1,770.84 1,770.84
Supplier Payment: State Fire
Training: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451798 05/08/2025 State Fire Training 0 100.00 100.00
Supplier Payment: Midwest
Veterinary Supply Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451770 05/08/2025 Midwest Veterinary Supply
Inc
914.84 0 914.84
Supplier Payment: Cfed: 05/08/2025 Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451725 05/08/2025 Cfed 0 531.25 531.25
Supplier Payment: Dlr Group Inc:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Dlr Group Inc 50,832.80 0 50,832.80
Supplier Payment: Lozano Smith Llp:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451765 05/08/2025 Lozano Smith Llp 4,488.50 0 4,488.50
Supplier Payment: Pars: 05/08/2025 City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451780 05/08/2025 Pars 3,500.00 0 3,500.00
Supplier Payment: Hose-Man Inc:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451753 05/08/2025 Hose-Man Inc 196.09 0 196.09
Supplier Payment: Dell Marketing Lp:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Dell Marketing Lp 2,168.42 0 2,168.42

Page 28 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 11 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Transtech
Engineers Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451804 05/08/2025 Transtech Engineers Inc 11,973.75 0 11,973.75 Supplier Payment: Sterling Coffee
Service: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451799 05/08/2025 Sterling Coffee Service 1,730.15 0 1,730.15 Supplier Payment: Manuel E
Pilonieta: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Manuel E Pilonieta 135.00 0 135.00
Supplier Payment: Bern Marie'S
Promotional Products: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451720 05/08/2025 Bern Marie'S Promotional
Products
869.90 0 869.90
Supplier Payment: Cintas
Corporation: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451727 05/08/2025 Cintas Corporation 4,346.52 0 4,346.52 Supplier Payment: Collins & Collins
Llp: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451730 05/08/2025 Collins & Collins Llp 6,522.20 0 6,522.20 Supplier Payment: G/M Business
Interiors: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 G/M Business Interiors 90.53 0 90.53
Supplier Payment: Terra Vista
Animal Hospital: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451800 05/08/2025 Terra Vista Animal Hospital 200.00 0 200.00 Supplier Payment: Champion Fire
Systems Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Champion Fire Systems
Inc
167.01 0 167.01
Supplier Payment: Hernandez Group
Llc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451750 05/08/2025 Hernandez Group Llc 86.16 0 86.16
Supplier Payment: Grainger:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451746 05/08/2025 Grainger 3,430.78 0 3,430.78
Supplier Payment: K-K
Woodworking: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451764 05/08/2025 K-K Woodworking 10.76 0 10.76
Supplier Payment: Aufbau
Corporation: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Aufbau Corporation 16,480.00 0 16,480.00
Supplier Payment: Anne Marie Dunn:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Anne Marie Dunn 288.00 0 288.00
Supplier Payment: Novelty Printing
Inc: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451774 05/08/2025 Novelty Printing Inc 0 450.00 450.00
Supplier Payment: Edwins Towing
Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451736 05/08/2025 Edwins Towing Inc 50.00 0 50.00
Supplier Payment: Kingdom
Calibrations Inc: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451763 05/08/2025 Kingdom Calibrations Inc 0 914.40 914.40 Supplier Payment: Hci Environmental
& Engineering Svc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Hci Environmental &
Engineering Svc
11,720.00 0 11,720.00
Supplier Payment: Holliday Rock Co
Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451752 05/08/2025 Holliday Rock Co Inc 1,071.04 0 1,071.04 Supplier Payment: Vortex Industries
Llc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451809 05/08/2025 Vortex Industries Llc 1,535.00 0 1,535.00

Page 29 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 12 of 14 ends

88.28 0 88.28
Supplier Payment: Mutual Propane:
05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451772 05/08/2025 Mutual Propane 0 1,030.16 1,030.16
Supplier Payment: Odp Business
Solutions Llc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451777 05/08/2025 Odp Business Solutions Llc 520.10 0 520.10 Supplier Payment: Accurate
California Llc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451713 05/08/2025 Accurate California Llc 143.31 0 143.31 Supplier Payment: Collaborative
Solutions Llc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Collaborative Solutions Llc 30,404.00 0 30,404.00 Supplier Payment: San Bernardino
County Registrar Of Voters:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451790 05/08/2025 San Bernardino County
Registrar Of Voters
253.15 0 253.15
Supplier Payment: Daniel A Moisa:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Daniel A Moisa 957.60 0 957.60
Supplier Payment: Westbound
Communications Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451812 05/08/2025 Westbound
Communications Inc
11,574.06 0 11,574.06
Supplier Payment: Citrus Motors
Ontario Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451728 05/08/2025 Citrus Motors Ontario Inc 33.97 0 33.97 Supplier Payment: Waxie Sanitary
Supply: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451811 05/08/2025 Waxie Sanitary Supply 11,677.49 0 11,677.49 Supplier Payment: Red Wing
Business Advantage Account:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451788 05/08/2025 Red Wing Business
Advantage Account
734.39 0 734.39
Supplier Payment: ADP, Inc.:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451714 05/08/2025 ADP, Inc. 208.50 0 208.50
Supplier Payment: Positive
Promotions Inc.: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451782 05/08/2025 Positive Promotions Inc. 0 1,739.10 1,739.10 Supplier Payment: Auto & Rv
Specialists Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451719 05/08/2025 Auto & Rv Specialists Inc 72.33 0 72.33 Supplier Payment: Amg & Associates
Inc: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
05/08/2025 Amg & Associates Inc 0 217,263.78 217,263.78 Supplier Payment: William Vasta
Photography: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451815 05/08/2025 William Vasta Photography 4,000.00 0 4,000.00 Supplier Payment: Econolite Control
Products Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Econolite Control Products
Inc
40,683.58 0 40,683.58
Supplier Payment: Intelesys:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451758 05/08/2025 Intelesys 1,556.10 0 1,556.10
Supplier Payment: Kimley-Horn &
Associates Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451762 05/08/2025 Kimley-Horn & Associates
Inc
32,260.80 0 32,260.80

Page 30 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 13 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
Supplier Payment: Stanley Pest
Control: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451797 05/08/2025 Stanley Pest Control 70.00 0 70.00
Supplier Payment: Rialto Power
Equipment Co: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
451789 05/08/2025 Rialto Power Equipment
Co
0 1,026.31 1,026.31
Supplier Payment: Rancho Smog
Center: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451785 05/08/2025 Rancho Smog Center 49.95 0 49.95
Supplier Payment: Napa Auto Parts:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Napa Auto Parts 526.58 0 526.58
Supplier Payment: 360 Deep
Cleaning Llc: 05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
05/08/2025 360 Deep Cleaning Llc 0 8,830.00 8,830.00
Supplier Payment: 6 Inch Media,
LLC: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 6 Inch Media, LLC 1,150.00 0 1,150.00
Supplier Payment: Graphics Factory
Printing Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451747 05/08/2025 Graphics Factory Printing
Inc
692.83 0 692.83
Supplier Payment: Mediwaste
Disposal Llc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451769 05/08/2025 Mediwaste Disposal Llc 40.55 0 40.55
Supplier Payment: Siteone
Landscape Supply Llc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451793 05/08/2025 Siteone Landscape Supply
Llc
6,163.76 0 6,163.76
Supplier Payment: South Bay
Foundry Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451795 05/08/2025 South Bay Foundry Inc 424.13 0 424.13 Supplier Payment: Cal Poly Pomona:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451723 05/08/2025 Cal Poly Pomona 4,275.00 0 4,275.00
Supplier Payment: Everde Growers:
05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451738 05/08/2025 Everde Growers 1,397.56 0 1,397.56
Supplier Payment: Maria Elena
Alvarez: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451766 05/08/2025 Maria Elena Alvarez 621.00 0 621.00
Supplier Payment: Palmer
Consulting: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Palmer Consulting 6,720.00 0 6,720.00
Supplier Payment: CSG Consultants,
Inc.: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451732 05/08/2025 CSG Consultants, Inc. 10,875.00 0 10,875.00 Supplier Payment: Life-Assist Inc:
05/08/2025
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
05/08/2025 Life-Assist Inc 0 1,495.89 1,495.89
Supplier Payment: Occupational
Health Centers Of Ca: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451775 05/08/2025 Occupational Health
Centers Of Ca
2,138.00 0 2,138.00
Supplier Payment: Lenovo (United
States) Inc: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
05/08/2025 Lenovo (United States) Inc 1,819.90 0 1,819.90 Supplier Payment: Rancho West
Animal Hospital: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451786 05/08/2025 Rancho West Animal
Hospital
400.00 0 400.00
Supplier Payment: Coast Fitness
Repair Shop: 05/08/2025
City of Rancho
Cucamonga
451729 05/08/2025 Coast Fitness Repair Shop 1,750.15 0 1,750.15

Page 31 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - without
SoCal Gas
07:58 AM
05/12/2025

Page 14 of 14 ends

Supplier Payment Company Check
Number Check Date Supplier Name City of Rancho
Cucamonga
Rancho
Cucamonga Fire
Protection District
Payment Amount for
Reporting Transaction
2,282,082.63 320,151.03 2,602,233.66

Page 32 ends

DATE:May 21, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
President and Members of the Board of Directors
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jevin Kaye, Finance Director
Veronica Lopez, Accounts Payable Supervisor
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve City and Fire District Weekly Check Registers for Checks Issued to Southern California Gas Company in the Total Amount of $3,131.32 Dated April 29, 2025, Through May 11, 2025. (CITY/FIRE)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council/Board of Directors of the Fire Protection District approve payment of demands as presented. Weekly check register amounts are $2,746.19 and $385.13 for the City and the Fire District, respectively.

BACKGROUND:

N/A

ANALYSIS:

N/A

FISCAL IMPACT:

Adequate budgeted funds are available for the payment of demands per the attached listing.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

N/A

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Weekly Check Register

Page 33 ends

Council Meeting Check Register - SoCal Gas
08:02 AM
05/12/2025

Page 1 of 1 ends

Page 34 ends

DATE: May 21, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Michael Parmer, Engagement and Special Programs Director Deborah Allen, Management Analyst I Deborah Allen
SUBJECT: Consideration to Approve the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's Wildfire Mitigation Plan. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility's (RCMU's) Wildfire Mitigation Plan.

BACKGROUND:

On September 21, 2018 then-Governor Jerry Brown signed Senate Bill ("SB") 901 requiring that publicly owned utilities ("POUs") prepare and present a Wildfire Mitigation Plan (WMP) to its Governing Board by January 1, 2020, and each year thereafter. On July 12, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed Assembly Bill ("AB") 1054 and AB 111 into law, requiring POUs, including the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU), to submit their WMP to the California Wildfire Safety Advisory Board ("WSAB”). The WSAB will review the POUs WMP and produce advisory opinions on their content and sufficiency, as well as provide recommendations on mitigating wildfire risk. As specified in Public Utilities Code § 8387(b)(1), each POU is required to update its WMP annually by July 1 and present it to its Governing Board.

On December 18, 2019 the Rancho Cucamonga City Council approved RCMU’s first 2020 WMP, and the approved WMP was filed and submitted to the WSAB on March 18, 2020. The City Council approved RCMU’s 2021 WMP update on June 2, 2021, and the approved WMP was filed and submitted to the WSAB on June 17, 2021. On June 15, 2022, the City Council approved RCMU’s 2022 WMP update, and the approved WMP was filed and submitted to the WSAB on June 21, 2022. The City Council approved RCMU’s 2023 WMP comprehensive update and Independent Evaluation (IE) on June 7, 2023, and the approved WMP was filed and submitted to the WSAB on June 21, 2023. On June 5, 2024, the City Council approved RCMU’s 2024 WMP and the approved plan was submitted to the WSAB on June 20, 2024.

On December 6, 2024, the WSAB issued its Advisory Opinion for the POU 2024 WMPs. In the Advisory Opinion, the WSAB recommends that POUs that do not own or control any overhead electric supply facilities within Tier 2 or Tier 3 of the California Public Utilities Commission’s (“CPUC”) High Fire Threat District (“HFTD”) utilize an alternative reporting process. Specifically, the WSAB recommends that if a POU in this category does not have any substantive updates to its WMP from the prior year, then that POU may simply resubmit its most recent WMP to the WSAB along with a supplemental letter that includes reporting on relevant metrics. RCMU does

Page 35 ends

Page 2 ends

2 8
2 7
not own or control any overhead electric supply facilities in or near any Tier 2 or Tier 3 areas of the HFTD and therefore is eligible to use this alternative process.

ANALYSIS:

The primary goal of RCMU's Wildfire Mitigation Plan ("WMP") is to describe RCMU’s existing programs, practices, and measures that effectively reduce the probability that RCMU’s electric supply system could be the origin or contributing source for the ignition of a wildfire. RCMU's WMP indicates its service area is considered "low risk" because it has 100% underground electric lines so the design, maintenance, and inspection meet all utility regulatory standards. Secondly, RCMU lines are located almost two miles away from the nearest High (Tier 2) and Very High (Tier 3) Fire Severity Zones on the CPUC’s HFTD Map.

RCMU has no substantive updates to its most recent WMP (Attachment 1). As described above, RCMU is eligible to use the WSAB’s alternative reporting process. Consistent with that guidance, RCMU is submitting a Supplemental Letter (Attachment 2) to the WSAB that provides metrics data and other relevant updates.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact for the approval of the RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan 2024 update.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item supports the City Council’s Core Values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all by developing and updating a comprehensive Wildfire Mitigation Plan for its Municipal Utility to meet the community’s needs.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Wildfire Mitigation Plan 2025 Update
Attachment 2- RCMU Supplemental Letter to WSAB

Page 36 ends

Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility

WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN

Risk Category: Low | VERSION 1.2
Attachment 1

Page 37 ends

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. UTILITY OVERVIEW AND CONTEXT ............................................................................................... 4 A. UTILITY DESCRIPTION AND CONTEXT SETTING TABLE ......................................................... 4 B. STATUTORY CROSS-REFERENCE TABLE .................................................................................. 6 C. PROCESS FOR UTILITY ADOPTION AND SUBMITTAL OF WMP & OPPORTUNITIES FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ................................................................................................................ 8 D. DESCRIPTION OF WHERE WMP INFO CAN BE FOUND ON UTILITY WEBSITE .................. 8 E. PURPOSE OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN ................................................................... 8 F. ORGANIZATION OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN ......................................................... 9 II. OBJECTIVES OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN ................................................................... 9 A. MINIMIZING SOURCES OF IGNITION ........................................................................................ 9 B. RESILIENCY OF THE ELECTRIC GRID ..................................................................................... 10 C. MINIMIZING UNNECESSARY OR INEFFECTIVE ACTIONS ................................................... 10 III. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES ....................................................................................................... 10 A. RCMU ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES- UTILITY GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE ................. 10 B. COORDINATION WITH WATER UTILITIES ................................................................................. 11 C. COORDINATION WITH COMMUNICATION INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDERS ...................... 11 D. STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ....................................................... 12 IV. WILDFIRE RISKS AND DRIVERS ASSOCIATED WITH DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE ..................................................................................................... 13 A. PARTICULAR RISKS AND RISK DRIVERS ASSOCIATED WITH TOPOGRAPHIC AND CLIMATOLOGICAL RISK FACTORS ................................................................................................. 13 B. ENTERPRISE SAFETY RISKS ....................................................................................................... 13 C. CHANGES TO THE CPUC FIRE THREAT MAP......................................................................... 14 V. WILDFIRE PREVENTATIVE STRATEGIES ....................................................................................... 15 A. HIGH FIRE THREAT DISTRICT ..................................................................................................... 15 B. WEATHER MONITORING ............................................................................................................ 16 C. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS ........................................................................... 16 D. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT ................................................................................................... 18 E. INSPECTIONS ................................................................................................................................. 18 F. RECLOSER POLICY ..................................................................................................................... 18 G. DEENERGIZATION .......................................................................................................................... 18 VI. COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PUBLIC AWARENESS ................................................................. 18 VII. RESTORATION OF SERVICE ............................................................................................................ 19 VIII. EVALUATING THE PLAN ................................................................................................................. 20 A. METRICS AND ASSUMPTIONS FOR MEASURING PLAN PERFORMANCE........................ 20

Page 38 ends

3 B. IMPACT OF METRICS ON PLAN ................................................................................................ 20 C.MONITORING AND AUDITING OF THE PLAN .......................................................................... 21 D. IDENTIFYING AND CORRECTING DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLAN MONITORING .............. 21 E. MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INSPECTIONS ........................................................ 21 IX. INDEPENDENT AUDITOR .............................................................................................................. 21 X. WSAB GUIDANCE ADVISORY OPINION RECOMMENDATIONS (2023 UPDATE) .................. 21

Page 39 ends

4 I. UTILITY OVERVIEW AND CONTEXT
A. UTILITY DESCRIPTION AND CONTEXT SETTING TABLE
Utility Name City of Rancho Cucamonga
Service Territory Size 4 square miles
Owned Assets 38 circuit miles of Underground Electric Distribution 42 miles of Underground Fiber Optics
Number of Customers
Served
3,592 electric customer accounts
Population Within
Service Territory
7,400 people (est.)
Customer Class
Makeup Number of Accounts Share of Total Load (MWh)
61% Residential
38% Small/Medium Business
1% Commercial/Industrial
6% Residential
59% Small/Medium Business
35% Commercial/Industrial
Service Territory
Location/Topography1
99% Urban
1% Shrub
Service Territory
Wildland Urban
Interface2
(Based on total area)
0% Wildland Urban Interface
0% Wildland Urban Intermix
Percent of Service
Territory in CPUC High
Fire Threat Districts
(Based on total area)
[X] Includes maps
Tier 2: 0%
Tier 3: 0%
Prevailing Wind
Directions & Speeds by
Season
The Santa Ana winds typically peaks in October and concludes in the Spring. Wind speed varies, but the wind directions are typically aligned in a northeast to southwest direction.

Miles of Owned Lines
Underground and/or
Overhead
Overhead Dist.: 0 miles
Overhead Trans.: 0 miles
Underground Dist.: 38 miles
Underground Trans.: 0 miles
Explanatory Note 1 - Methodology for measuring miles is based on RCMU’s final as-built distribution circuit maps.

Percent of Owned Lines
in CPUC High Fire
Threat Districts
Overhead Distribution Lines as % of Total Distribution System (Inside and Outside Service Territory)
Tier 2: 0%
Tier 3: 0%
Explanatory Note 1 – RCMU does not own any overhead lines inside or outside its service territory.

1 This data shall be based on the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, California Multi- Source Vegetation Layer Map, depicting WHR13 Types (Wildlife Habitat Relationship classes grouped into 13 major land cover types) available at: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b7ec5d68d8114b1fb2bfbf4665989eb3.

2 This data shall be based on the definitions and maps maintained by the United States Department of Agriculture, as most recently assembled in the 20 20 Wildland -Urban Interface of the Conterminous United States, available at https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/documents/usfs::wildland-urban-interface-2020-map-service/explore

Page 40 ends

5 Customers have ever
lost service due to an
IOU PSPS event?
☐ Yes [X] No
If yes, then provide the following data for calendar year [____]:

Number of shut-off events: [____]
Customer Accounts that lost service for >10 minutes: [____] For prior response, average duration before service restored: [____] Customers have ever
been notified of a
potential loss of service
to due to a forecasted
IOU PSPS event?
☐ Yes [X] No
Has developed
protocols to pre-
emptively shut off
electricity in response
to elevated wildfire
risks?
☐ Yes [X] No
Has previously pre-
emptively shut off
electricity in response
to elevated wildfire
risk?
☐ Yes [X] No
If yes, then provide the following data for calendar year 2023:

Number of shut-off events: 0
Customer Accounts that lost service for >10 minutes: 0
For prior response, average duration before service restored: N/A

Page 41 ends

6 Map 1: RCMU Service Territory – Up dated

B. STATUTORY CROSS -REFERENCE TABLE
Table 1: Cross References to Statutory Requirements

Requirement Statutory Language Location in
WMP
Persons
Responsible
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(A): An accounting of the
responsibilities of persons responsible for executing
the plan.

Section III.A
Objectives of
the Plan
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(B): The objectives of the wildfire
mitigation plan.

Section II

Preventive
Strategies
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(C): A description of the preventive
strategies and programs to be adopted by the local
publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative to minimize the risk of its electrical lines and equipment causing catastrophic wildfires, including consideration of dynamic climate change risks.

Section III.A

Evaluation
Metrics
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(D): A description of the metrics the
local publicly owned electric utility or electrical
cooperative plans to use to evaluate the wildfire
mitigation plan’s performance and the assumptions
that underlie the use of those metrics.

Section VIII.A

Impact of
Metrics
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(E): A discussion of how the application of previously identified metrics to previous wildfire
mitigation plan performances has informed the wildfire
mitigation plan.

Section II.C
Section VIII.B
Section X

Page 42 ends

7 De-
energization
Protocols
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(F): Protocols for disabling reclosers
and deenergizing portions of the electrical
distribution system that consider the associated
impacts on public safety, as well as protocols related to mitigating the public safety impacts of those protocols, including impacts on critical first responders and on
health and communication infrastructure.

Section V.F

Customer
Notification
Procedures
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(G): Appropriate and feasible
procedures for notifying a customer who may be
impacted by the deenergizing of electrical lines. The
procedures shall consider the need to notify, as a priority, critical first responders, health care facilities, and
operators of telecommunications infrastructure.

Section VI
Vegetation
Management
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(H): Plans for vegetation management. Section V.D

Inspections
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(I): Plans for inspections of the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s electrical infrastructure.

Section V.E
Section VIII.A
Section VIII.B

Prioritization
of Wildfire
Risks
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(J): A list that identifies, describes, and prioritizes all wildfire risks, and drivers for those risks, throughout the local publicly owned electric utility’s
or electrical cooperative’s service territory. The list shall include, but not be limited to, both of the following:

(i) Risks and risk drivers associated with design,
construction, operation, and maintenance of the local
publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s equipment and facilities.

(ii) Particular risks and risk drivers associated with
topographic and climatological risk factors throughout
the different parts of the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s service territory.

Section I V.A
Section V.C

CPUC Fire
Threat Map
Adjustments
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(K): Identification of any geographic
area in the local publicly owned electric utility’s or
electrical cooperative’s service territory that is a higher wildfire threat than is identified in a commission fire threat map, and identification of where the commission
should expand a high fire threat district based on new
information or changes to the environment.

Section V.A
Enterprise
wide Risks
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(L): A methodology for identifying and
presenting enterprise wide safety risk and wildfire-
related risk.

Section IV.B
Restoration of
Service
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(M): A statement of how the local
publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative will restore service after a wildfire.

Section VII
Monitor and
Audit
PUC § 8387(b)(2)(N): A description of the processes and procedures the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative shall use to do all of the following:

Section VIII.C

Page 43 ends

8 (i) Monitor and audit the implementation of the
wildfire mitigation plan.
(ii) Identify any deficiencies in the wildfire
mitigation plan or in its implementation and correct
those deficiencies.
(iii) Monitor and audit the effectiveness of electrical line and equipment inspections, including
inspections performed by contractors, that are
carried out under the plan, other applicable

statutes, or commission rules.

Qualified
Independent
Evaluator
PUC § 8387(c): The local publicly owned electric utility or electrical cooperative shall contract with a qualified
independent evaluator with experience in assessing the
safe operation of electrical infrastructure to review and assess the comprehensiveness of its wildfire mitigation plan. The independent evaluator shall issue a report that shall be made available on the Internet Web site of the local publicly owned electric utility or electrical
cooperative, and shall present the report at a public
meeting of the local publicly owned electric utility’s or electrical cooperative’s governing board.

Section IX
C. PROCESS FOR UTILITY ADOPTION AND SUBMITTAL OF

WMP & OPPORTUNITIES FOR PUBLIC COMMENT
The Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU), a Publicly Owned Utility (POU), prepares the Wildfire Mitigation Plan (WMP). It is then placed on the City of Rancho Cucamonga Council agenda. This agenda is posted three days before the meeting, so members of the public are aware that the WMP is being recommended by staff to be approved. It is typically placed on the Consent Calendar and can be pulled for discussion by any of the Council members or requested for discussion by members of the public.

D. DESCRIPTION OF WHERE WMP INFO CAN BE FOUND ON

UTILITY WEBSITE
The WMP, updates, and any associated approvals will be made available for public review on the City Council’s agenda located on the City’s website, as well as the City’s Council agenda posting located for viewing at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall. RCMU’s most recent Independent Evaluation (IE) Report and existing WMPs and updates are included on RCMU’s website located at https://www.cityofrc.us/rcmu . No discussion has occurred on whether any enhancements to future IE reports will be needed.

E. PURPOSE OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN
RCMU’s entire electric supply system is located underground in conduit and vaults.

Historically, undergrounded electric lines have not been associated with catastrophic wildfires.

The undergrounding of electric lines serves as an effective mitigation measure to reduce the potential of power-line ignited wildfires. Based on a review of local conditions and historical fires, RCMU has determined that its electrical lines and equipment do not pose a significant risk of
catastrophic wildfire.

Page 44 ends

9 Despite this low risk, RCMU has taken appropriate actions to help its region prevent and respond to the increasing risk of devastating wildfires. In its role as a public agency, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District (Fire District) closely coordinates with other local safety and emergency officials to help protect against fires and respond to emergencies. In its role as a utility, RCMU follows all applicable design, construction, operation, and maintenance requirements that reduce safety risks associated with its electric system. This Wildfire Mitigation Plan describes the safety -related measures that RCMU follows to reduce its risk of causing wildfires.

F. ORGANIZATION OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN
This Wildfire Mitigation Plan included the following elements:
• Utility Overview and Context;
• Objectives of the Plan;
• Roles and responsibilities for carrying out the Plan; • Identification of key wildfire risks and risk drivers; • Description of Wildfire Mitigation Strategies;
• Metrics for measuring the performance of the plan and identifying areas for improvement;
• Historical results for metrics;
• Description of community outreach and education

II. OBJECTIVES OF THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION PLAN

A primary goal of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan is to
describe RCMU’s existing programs, practices, and
measures that effectively reduce the probability that
RCMU’s electric supply system could be the origin or
contributing source for the ignition of a wildfire. To
support this goal, RCMU regularly evaluates the prudent and cost-effective improvements to its physical assets, operations, and training that can help reduce the risk of equipment-related fires.

The secondary goal of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan is to improve the resiliency of the electric grid.

As part of the development of this plan, RCMU assesses new industry practices and technologies that will reduce the likelihood of an interruption (frequency) in service and improve the restoration (duration) of service.

A. MINIMIZING SOURCES OF IGNITION
Another primary goal of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan is to minimize the probability that RCMU’s transmission and distribution system may be an original or contributing source for the ignition of a wildfire. RCMU has evaluated the prudent and cost-effective improvements to its physical assets, operations, and training that can help to meet this objective. RCMU had previously implemented those changes consistent with this evaluation as follows:

• RCMU’s entire electric supply system is located underground in conduit and vaults.

Historically, undergrounded electric lines have not been associated with catastrophic wildfires. The undergrounding of electric lines serves as an effective mitigation measure to reduce the potential of power-line ignited wildfires. Based on a review of local conditions and historical fires, RCMU has determined that its electrical lines and equipment do not pose a significant risk of catastrophic wildfire.

Page 45 ends

10 • RCMU monitors wildfires in RCMU Service Area
• RCMU monitors wildfires in City boundaries NOT in RCMU Service Area that are within a 10-acre area
• RCMU monitors wildfires in City boundaries NOT in RCMU Service Area that are beyond the 10-acre area
B. RESILIENCY OF THE ELECTRIC GRID
The secondary goal of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan is to improve the resiliency of the electric grid. As part of the development of this plan, RCMU assesses new industry practices and technologies that will reduce the likelihood of a disruption in service and improve the restoration of service. RCMU implemented changes consistent with this evaluation and adjusted our 2023 WMP and added the following performance metrics “Number of Inspections for Distribution Step-Down Transformers” and “Number of Inspections Completed for Distribution Lines”. In addition, RCMU is taking steps towards projects and programs to improve electrical outage response and establish equipment replacement.

C. MINIMIZING UNNECESSARY OR INEFFECTIVE ACTIONS
The final goal of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan is to measure the effectiveness of specific wildfire mitigation strategies. Where a particular action, program, or protocol is determined to be unnecessary or ineffective, RCMU will assess whether a modification or replacement is merited. This plan will also help determine if more cost -effective measures would produce the same or better results. RCMU implemented those changes consistent with this evaluation and adjusted our 2023 WMP by deleting the metric “Wires Down” as RCMU’s entire electric supply is located underground in conduit and vaults.

D. EFF ECTIVENESS OF WMP
This WMP provides methodologies to measure the effectiveness of specific wildfire mitigation strategies and how those strategies measurably reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire. Where a particular action, program component or protocol is determined to be unnecessary or ineffective, RCMU will assess whether a modification or replacement is merited. This plan will also help determine if more cost-effective measures would produce the same or improved results.

III. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

Page 46 ends

11 A.RCMU ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES -

UTILITY GOVERNANCE STRUCTURE
A. COORDINATION WITH WATER UTILITIES
RCMU does not serve sites that power any water utilities, water conveyance, or critical water facilities.

B. COORDINATION WITH COMMUNICATION

INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDERS
For the City and the Fire District, relevant lines of communication during emergencies include landline, cell phone, text messaging, and radio. During emergency scenes: same as above, plus radio communication via the 800 and VHF radios. In addition, during emergencies, we can activate our Auxiliary Communications Service (ham radio) team to assist with first responders and the EOC during a wildfire incident.

Regarding the utility’s staff roles regarding fire prevention, response, and investigation, other than providing an agency representative during an emergency involving RCMU facilities there are no other roles needed since RCMU’s service area is outside of the wildfire threat area. RCMU’s relationship with its investor-owned utility, Southern California Edison Company (SCE) during its Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) events is only at the Transmission and Sub- Transmission levels. It is important to note that SCE provides electricity to almost 85% of the City. For those residents, the City receives advanced email notifications that SCE will be exploring a possible PSPS event or has begun PSPS events at the Distribution circuit level. Any SCE PSPS outages occurring at the Distribution level will still affect a large majority of City residents and businesses served by SCE, but not RCMU powered customers or businesses.

RCMU’s customers will only be impacted by the PSPS events ordered by SCE, if the SCE Transmission and Sub-Transmission level lines are ordered to be de -energized. To date, SCE has informed RCMU that it does not intend to de-energize any of its Transmission and Sub - Transmission circuits, therefore, RCMU has not implemented a mitigation strategy for SCE’s PSPS, nor have we deenergized our own lines when a wildfire threat is looming. RCMU also does not have a distribution level generator allowing the utility to withstand an SCE Transmission and Sub- Transmission PSPS event should that ever occur.

In 2023, Rancho Cucamonga did not experience any wildfires, however, there was one (1) Red Flag warning event issued for the San Bernardino County area. In March 2022, the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District and RCMU partnered with a company called Lindsey FireSense to

City Manager
Rancho Cucamonga City Council

Page 47 ends

12 pilot three (3) fire monitoring sensor cameras attached to RCMU’s street light poles along the City’s foothill area which includes the Tier 2 and 3 fire threat zones. Based on this pilot, RCMU and the Fire District are expanding this project to capture additional significant data for future performance metrics and improve situational awareness for fire response.

C. STANDARDIZED EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
As a local governmental agency, 3 the City of Rancho Cucamonga has planning, communication, and coordination obligations pursuant to the California Office of Emergency Services’ Standardized Emergency Management System (“SEMS”) Regulations, 4 adopted in accordance with Government Code section 8607. The SEMS Regulations specify roles, responsibilities, and structures of communications at five distinct levels: field response, local government, operational area, regional, and state. 5 Pursuant to this structure, the City of Rancho Cucamonga coordinates and communicates with the relevant safety agencies as well as other relevant local and state agencies. During emergencies, RCMU has a key role in ensuring utility operations at the field, local government, and operational area levels.

Under the SEMS structure, a significant amount of preparation is done through advanced planning at the local level, including the coordination of efforts of public, private, and nonprofit organizations. San Bernardino serves as the Operational Area and is guided by the San Bernardino County Operational Area Coordinating Council which is made up of representatives of all 24 Cities and Towns . The Operational Area includes local and regional organizations that bring relevant expertise to the wildfire prevention and recovery planning process. These participants include local school districts, utilities, first responder agencies, non-profits (such as the United Way and the American Red Cross), all regional Hospitals, special districts, communications providers, and other similar organizations.

Pursuant to the SEMS structure, the City of Rancho Cucamonga also participates in emergency training exercises where the Fire District hosts a tabletop exercise with all City Department Directors including RCMU on a wildfire drill in our wildland -urban interface fire area. At a minimum, exercises will be provided by either the Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District or by invitation from another supporting agency such as the County Operational Area. RCMU is a member of the California Utility Emergency Association, which is a State agency that plays a key role in ensuring communication and mutual aid between utilities during emergencies.

3 As defined in Cal. Gov. Code § 8680.2.
4 19 CCR § 2407.
5 Cal. Gov. Code § 2403(b):
(1) “Field response level” commands emergency response personnel and resources to carry out tactical decisions and activities in direct response to an incident or threat. (2) “Local government level” manages and coordinates the overall emergency response and recovery activities within their jurisdiction.
(3) “Operational area level” manages and/or coordinates information, resources, and priorities among local governments within the operational area and serves as the coordination and communication link between the local government level and the regional level.
(4) “Regional level” manages and coordinates information and resources among operational areas within the mutual aid region designated pursuant to Government Code §8600 and between the operational areas and the state level. This level along with the state level coordinates overall state agency support for emergency response activities. (5) “State level” manages state resources in response to the emergency needs of the other levels, manages and coordinates mutual aid among the mutual aid regions and between the regional level and state level, and serves as the coordination and communication l ink with the federal disaster response sys tem.

Page 48 ends

13 IV. WILDFIRE RISKS AND DRIVERS ASSOCIATED WITH

DESIGN CONSTRUCTION OPERATION AND

MAINTENANCE
A. PARTICULAR RISKS AND RISK DRIVERS ASSOCIATED WITH

TOPOGRAPHIC AND CLIMATOLOGICAL RISK FACTORS
Within RCMU’s service territory and the surrounding areas, the primary risk drivers for wildfire are the following:
• High Temperature
• Low Humidity
• Hillside Terrain
• Fire Weather Conditions
• Prolonged Drought
• Climate Change
• Fire History
B. ENTERPRISE SAFETY RISKS
Fire risks due to topographical and climatological factors are determined to be “Low” [Tier 1 (i.e. low risk)] within RCMU’s service area. The description of tiered fire threat zones is shown in Table 2 below.

Table 2: Description of Tiered Fire Threat Zones

Zone Category Description

Tier 3

Extreme
Wildland areas where exposure to overhead power lines, the availability of water resources, and emergency responder circulation routes affect response times to combat wildland fires.

Tier 2 Elevated Elevated risk due to vegetation, high voltage regional transmission lines crossing the area, and adjacency to Tier 3 fire threat zones.

Tier 1 Low Well developed areas, typically with underground high voltage circuitry.

On September 19, 2018, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council adopted Resolution No. 18-103 which made a determination that RCMU's current service area is not located in an area that is considered an elevated or extreme risk of electric line wildfires; has 0 percent overhead electric lines and equipment and does not pose a significant risk of causing wildfires.

RCMU continues to be actively involved in the California Municipal Utilities Association’s (CMUA’s) Wildfire Preparedness and Response Working Group to help identify any

Page 49 ends

14 unidentified risks. In May 2022, the Working Group focused on risk drivers for powerline caused catastrophic wildfires and innovative mitigation options. CMUA invited a broad range of utility staff, state agency staff including the Wildfire Safety Advisory Board (WSAB), industry experts, and academics to participate in this discussion. The Working Group will continue to discuss unidentified wildfire risk drivers and mitigation measures that could address these risks. Based on the input provided during this meeting, CMUA will produce a publicly available, post- meeting report that summarizes the group’s conclusions and recommendations. RCMU’s staff participated in CMUA’s meeting and discuss ed any changes that RCMU has made to its operations in response to the conclusions and recommendations of the Working Group in a future WMP.

In a continuous effort to review and improve on any wildfire risks in March 2022, the Fire District and RCMU partnered with a company called Lindsey FireSense for fire monitoring sensor cameras attached to RCMU’s street light poles along the City’s foothill area which includes the Tier 2 and 3 fire threat zones. The Rancho Cucamonga Fire District is expanding this program as funding for this project was approved in October 2022 and received in April 2023 . This includes the installation of a 30 -camera unit, an early wildfire detection system along the City’s northern boundary. The system will provide rapid detection, reporting, and response to wildfires. As the RCMU territory continues to grow, we may need to expand our metrics based on this monitoring system.

C. CHANGES TO THE CPUC FIRE THREAT MAP
There were no changes to the CPUC Fire Threat Map during this period.

V. WILDFIRE PREVENTATIVE STRATEGIES
A. HIGH FIRE THREAT DISTRICT
RCMU, as a member of the California Municipal Utilities Association participated in the development of the CPUC’s Fire-Threat Map,6 which designates a High-Fire Threat District. In the CPUC Fire -Threat map development process, RCMU coordinated with SCE and determined that because RCMU’s system is entirely undergrounded, that SCE would serve as territory lead for the region served by RCMU. RCMU has incorporated the High Fire Threat District into its construction, inspection, maintenance, repair, and clearance practices, where applicable.

____________________________
6 Adopted by CPUC Decision 17-12-024.

Page 50 ends

15 Map 2: High Fire Threat District Map

Additionally, the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, acting as the Board of Directors of the Fire District also adopted a Wildland Urban Interface Fire Area Map for the City (see the map below), referring to the zone where undeveloped, wildland vegetation transitions to developed land such as residential neighborhoods which are at risk of wildfires.

Page 51 ends

16 Rancho Cucamonga Fire District’s Wildland Urban Interface Map 3: Fire Area Map with RCMU Electrical Circuits- Updated

B. WEATHER MONITORING
RCMU does not have any real -time wind direction and weather condition technology equipment installed that can track wind and weather conditions by season. The lack of funds and budget to sustain staffing and qualified professionals to monitor this data is challenging in that neither the utility nor other City Departments have the additional time or resources to track and monitor this information. However, the Emergency Management Division within the Rancho Cucamonga Fire District does receive consistent bri efing reports from the National Weather Service (NWS) San Diego Office, which covers our City and County. This briefing provides an overview of significant weather that may impact our area. These reports allow our team to increase our awareness and preparedness for upcoming events. If an event has the potential for severe implications including wind and weather conditions, NWS – San Diego will host conference calls leading up to the event so the affected jurisdictions can gather additional data in order to make critical decisions on how to manage any potential damage and disruption in services. Emergency Management will coordinate this information with our internal city stakeholders such as RCMU so collectively decisions can be made to preserve safety for our residents, especially during the high Santa Ana wind season.

C. DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS
RCMU’s electric facilities are designed and constructed to meet or exceed the relevant federal, state, or industry standard. RCMU treats CPUC General Orders (GO) 128 as a key industry standard for design and construction standards for underground electrical facilities. Since RCMU has a 100% underground system, the CPUC’s G.O. 95 overhead construction standards

Page 52 ends

17 do not apply. Additionally, RCMU monitors and follows, as appropriate, the National Electric Safety Code.

RCMU’s approach to grid hardening is discussed in this subsection and the other subsections below. RCMU’s 100% underground design and construction standards and field inspections of critical electrical equipment are some of its key grid hardening programs. Historically, undergrounded electric lines have not been associated with catastrophic wildfires. The undergrounding of electric lines serves as an effective grid hardening measure that reduces the potential of power-line ignited wildfires. The goal of RCMU’s program is prevention and mitigation response versus reaction in its system hardening and grid design. The responses below were specific questions included in the WSAB’s 2021 Guidance Advisory Opinion that provides a comprehensive context of the RCMU Territory.

RCMU’s Response: Yes, RCMU does have a circuit -by-circuit analysis which identifies essential facilities within its service area. The analysis does not identify whether those facilities have their own backup power.

RCMU’s Response: N/A. RCMU’s system is already designed to be 100% underground.

RCMU’s Response: N/A. RCMU is not affected by the IOU’s PSPS de-energization event and its facilities are not located in a wildfire area.

RCMU’s Response: N/A. RCMU does not serve sites that power any water utilities or water conveyance.

RCMU’s Response: N/A. RCMU does not serve any pump stations or sewage treatment plants.

RCMU’s Response: No, RCMU does not provide supplemental generation.

• Are the majority installed by the customers themselves or the utility? RCMU’s Response: Unknown: If any supplemental generation is installed, it is done by the customers and not installed by the utility.

• Can the utility open and close taps? Can the utility back-feed? • Does the POU perform a circuit-by-circuit analysis to identify essential facilities (and whether they have backup power) like hospitals, communication centers, and community resource centers?
• Does the POU assess system hardening measures that could be installed to prevent PSPS for those facilities?
• In what way does the POU prepare these facilities for a PSPS or another wildfire related de-energization event?
• For POUs that power water utilities or supply water themselves, if that water is used for drinking and firefighting, are certain projects being undertaken to harden the system for water delivery purposes?
• Are pump stations self-contained or have some level of fire protection? Is the supply to sewage treatment plants hardened?
• Is supplemental generation available such as backup batteries or backup power facilities?

Page 53 ends

18 RCMU’s Response: No, RCMU cannot control the taps of the customer’s backup / supplemental generation.

RCMU’s Response: N/A

• Can the utility sectionalize in a localized fashion?
RCMU’s Response: N/A

D. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT
RCMU has a 100% underground electric system, so the standard vegetation management practices do not apply to RCMU.

E. INSPECTIONS
RCMU meets or exceeds the minimum inspection requirements provided in the CPUC’s GO 165 (Inspection Requirements for Electric Distribution Facilities) by patrolling all pad mounted Transformers, Switches, and Capacitors, with a detailed inspection every 5 years. Pursuant to these rules, utilities inspect electric facilities in the High Fire Threat District more frequently than the other areas of its service territory. As described above, RCMU currently does not have any overhead powerlines located within or near the High-Fire Threat District within the CPUC’s Fire Threat Map. However, RCMU staff uses their knowledge of the specific environmental and geographical conditions of RCMU’s service territory to determine if any particular areas require more frequent inspections if necessary.

If RCMU staff discovers a facility in need of repair that is owned by an entity other than RCMU, RCMU will issue a notice to repair to the facility owner and work to ensure that necessary repairs are completed promptly.

F. RECLOSER POLICY
RCMU does not have any automatic reclosers deployed downstream of RCMU’s Arbors substation. All of RCMU’s circuit breakers have reclosing functionality which is conducted manually by a lineman in the field. RCMU’s system currently does not have this capability to be controlled by a Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) or other remote controls.

RCMU has the capability, should it be deemed necessary, to change the relay or reclosing settings during adverse conditions.

G. DEENERGIZATION
RCMU has the authority to preemptively shut off power due to fire-threat conditions, however, this option will only be used in extraordinary emergency circumstances. Due to the minimal risk of RCMU’s electrical supply facilities causing a power-line ignited wildfire, RCMU is not adopting specific protocols for de-energizing any portions of its electric distribution system.

RCMU will re-evaluate this determination in future updates to this Wildfire Mitigation Plan.

VI. COMMUNITY OUTREACH AND PUBLIC AWARENESS
RCMU works closely with the City's Community Affairs Network (CAN) which serves as the conduit for exceptional relationships and trusted information within the community. RCMU relies on CAN to disseminate key information to customers, residents, and other stakeholders. Vital shared information may include, but is not limited to severe weather updates, utility service interruptions, wildfire or other emergencies, and potential or active Public Safety • Are there wildfire related circumstances wherein either of these tactics would be useful?

Page 54 ends

19 Power Shutoff notifications, in coordination with other utility providers. This is done via the City’s/Fire District’s social media channels including Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Nextdoor, and the City’s website and other publications.

VII. RESTORATION OF SERVICE
In the unlikely event of a wildfire or other emergency event caused by or affecting RCMU’s electric system, that would require a public safety power shutoff, the City of Rancho Cucamonga will maintain a proactive plan to communicate with the community during high fire threat periods and disasters.
• Coordinate with the Fire District and the Rancho Cucamonga Police through the City’s EOC during emergencies or large-scale outages.
• Expand social media for the public to see current outages and estimated restoration times in coordination with the City’s Communications Team. • Communication plans through the City’s EOC will allow RCMU to coordinate with applicable emergency service personnel along with maintaining open lines of communication with customers, media, and internal City staff.

RCMU will work as quickly as possible to restore power
safely, following an event, in cooperation with the City’s Fire District, Police, and Public Works Departments.

RCMU will also engage its on -call high voltage
contractors as needed.

RCMU staff and its contractors will ensure which circuits are to be brought up safely and that any vital loads are restored first followed by non -vital loads. In most cases, the following restoration priorities will be followed
depending on the specific incident and available resources:
• Public safety in the affected areas
• Worker safety in performing the restoration work
• Life-support or critical customers
• Critical infrastructure (Key City facilities, City Police and Fire Departments, other key utility facilities (e.g., fiber communications)
• Major commercial activities/accounts critical to continuity of community services (e.g., gas stations, food stores, home supply stores, repair shops, eateries, lodging facilities, financial institutions, etc.)

• To reduce the total number of customers affected
• To reduce the length of time customers have been without power

In directing restoration efforts to best achieve the above priorities, RCMU Staff will generally find it most efficient to dedicate restoration resources to the following types of facilities in the following order of priority to optimally restore electric services:
• Arbors Substation located on Rochester Avenue and Stadium Way • All Distribution circuits (12 kV)
• Distribution feeders
• Distribution transformers
• Service lines

Page 55 ends

20 VIII. EVALUATING THE PLAN
A. METRICS AND ASSUMPTIONS FOR MEASURING PLAN

OUTCOME AND PERFORMANCE
RCMU will track metrics to measure the outcome and performance of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan including the number of fire ignitions; and inspections for above -ground, utility-owned distribution systems components.

Outcome Metric: FIRE IGNITIONS
For purposes of this metric, a fire ignition is defined as follows:
• RCMU facility was associated with the fire
• The fire was self-propagating and of a material other than electrical and/or communication facilities
• The resulting fire traveled greater than one linear meter from the ignition point; and • RCMU has knowledge that the fire occurred

RCMU will provide the number of fires that occurred that were less than 10 acres in size. Any fires greater than 10 acres will be individually described.

Performance Metric: ROUTINE INSPECTIONS OF ABOVE-GROUND, UTILITY-OWNED

DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM COMPONENTS
For purposes of this metric, the routine inspections for above -ground, utility -owned distribution systems components are defined as follows:

Inspections of:
• Distribution Step-Down Transformers
• Distribution Lines
B. IMPACT OF METRICS ON PLAN
Table 3: RCMU 2023 Outcome and Performance Metrics

Outcome Metric
Fire Ignitions CY 2023 CY 2024
# of Fire Ignition in RCMU Service Area 0 0
# of wildfires in City boundaries NOT in
RCMU Service Area (<10 acres)
0 0
# of wildfires in City boundaries NOT in
RCMU Service Area (> 10 acres)
0 0

Performance Metric
Above-Ground Utility-Owned
Distribution System Components
CY 2023 CY 2024
# of Inspections for Distribution
Step- Down Transformers)
8 7
# of Inspections Completed for
Distribution Lines
7 5
Red Flag Warning7 1 3
_______________________
7 The National Weather Service defines a “Red Flag Warning” as warm temperatures, very low humidities, and stronger winds are expected to combine to produce an increased risk of fire danger.

Page 56 ends

21 C. MONITORING AND AUDITING OF THE PLAN
This Wildfire Mitigation Plan will be presented to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council and RCMU staff will present updates to this plan.

The WMP, updates, and any associated approvals will be made available for public review on the City Council’s agenda located on the City’s website, as well as the City’s Council agenda posting located for viewing at Rancho Cucamonga City Hall. RCMU’s most recent Independent Evaluation Report and WMP are included on RCMU’s website located at https://www.cityofrc.us/rcmu. A discussion of the new metrics was discussed between the Fire District and RCMU Staff in the 2023 WMP update.

D. IDENTIFYING AND CORRECTING DEFICIENCIES IN THE

PLAN MONITORING
Based on the recommendations of the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, RCMU will correct any identified deficiencies and/or recommendations, as appropriate in the WSAB’s Guidance Advisory Opinions. This document also represents the combined effort of the POU industry associations to further the development of a template to respond to the WSAB’s Guidance Advisory Opinion in future reporting WMP cycles.

E. MONITORING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INSPECTIONS
A key mitigation measure against wildfires is vegetation management. Since RCMU has a 100% underground electric system, the standard vegetation management inspections do not apply to RCMU. However, RCMU added the metric of inspections for above ground transformers and distribution lines. Hence, we see the value of adding these inspections to our metrics to improve and support our wildfire mitigation efforts.

IX. INDEPENDENT AUDITOR
Public Utilities Code section 8387(c) requires RCMU to contract with a qualified independent evaluator with experience in assessing the safe operation of electrical infrastructure to review and assess the comprehensiveness of this Wildfire Mitigation Plan. The independent evaluator must issue a report that is posted on the City’s website. This report must also be presented to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council at a public meeting.

In evaluating and selecting an independent evaluator as required in PUC Section 8387(c), the City determined that the Fire District is the most qualified independent evaluator who understands the local conditions and fire risks for the City of Rancho Cucamonga and is aware that RCMU’s service area is located in a low -risk fire threat zone with 100% underground electric wire equipment. The City believes that the Fire District is qualified to review the comprehensiveness of the RCMU Wildfire Mitigation Plan.

X. WSAB GUIDANCE ADVISORY OPINION
RECOMMENDATIONS (2023 UPDATE)
On November 16, 2022, the Wildfire Safety Advisory Board (WSAB) issued its Guidance Advisory Opinion identifying some specific recommendations that POUs are requested to address in

Page 57 ends

22 their 2022 WMPs. This Section IX. restates each of the WSAB recommendations where RCMU provides a response.

WSAB Recommendation #1: The WSAB appreciates Rancho Cucamonga’s continued inclusion of a context -setting template and the addition of the statutory cross -reference table near the front of their 2022 WMP. The WSAB also appreciates that the utility updated their template with revised customer information – these templates need to be kept up-to-date as utility circumstances change, particularly with relation to assets in high wildfire threat areas. The WSAB encourages Rancho Cucamonga to continue including and updating this information and consider the proposed template in Appendix 1 as they prepare and file their 2023 comprehensive revision WMP.

RCMU’s Response: RCMU has updated our WMP based on the proposed template listed in the Guidance Advisory Opinion for the 2023 Wildfire Mitigation Plans of Electric Publicly Owned Utilities and Rural Electric Cooperatives document.

WSAB Recommendation #2: The WSAB appreciates Rancho Cucamonga’s clear and prominent website location for WMP information and the inclusion of some historical WMP information, as well as the addition of a paragraph and link to that information in the 2022 WMP itself as requested. The WSA 2 WMP B notes that the 2022 update WMP appears not to be available on the page and encourages Rancho Cucamonga to keep the page up-to-date.

RCMU’s Response: RCMU has posted the current version of the WMP on its website. We have deleted the historical versions to present the most recent information. These streamlining efforts should alleviate any electronic access issues.

WSAB Recommendation #3: The WSAB appreciates Rancho Cucamonga’s many changes in the 2022 WMP from the 2021 version, including new paragraphs describing coordination with SCE, discussing outage communication in more detail, talking about weather data monitoring, and describing the underground nature of Rancho’s assets along with additional information from the previous informational response. In addition, the WSAB appreciates Rancho Cucamonga including some responsive text to the 2022 Guidance Advisory Opinion but notes that it appears the specific Rancho Cucamonga points in that document were not addressed. The WSAB encourages Rancho Cucamonga to continue a relatively robust practice of updating their WMPs.

RCMU’s Response : RCMU has completed a robust update for our 2023 WMP. We anticipate continuing to make improvements as deemed fit in our role as an electric utility.

WSAB Recommendation #4: The WSAB applauds the new situational awareness pilot at Rancho Cucamonga, adding three fire -monitoring sensor cameras along the foothills, including pictures and maps related to that new effort. Given the low likelihood of catastrophic wildfire for Rancho Cucamonga, this addition shows a proactive approach to preventing and mitigating potential wildfires, even those not utility related.

RCMU’s Response: RCMU is building upon these efforts and will be placing additional cameras throughout the community as funding becomes available. These efforts should assist with ongoing fire prevention and early detection activities and further enhance the city as a world class community. As RCMU territory continues to grow, we will explore additional metrics relating to this new technology.

WSAB Recommendation #5: The WSAB notes that Rancho Cucamonga still included a generic “wires down” metric in their WMP, even with all assets reportedly underground. The WSAB appreciates the updated metric tracking results in the WMP but encourages Rancho Cucamonga to consider more relevant metrics, including performance metrics, in their 2023 comprehensive revision WMP.

Page 58 ends

23 RCMU’s Response: RCMU has replaced the metric of “wires down” and added the new metric “inspections”. This new performance metric is relevant for our underground infrastructure, and we look forward to providing this information to demonstrate RCMU’s efforts to mitigate potential wildfires.

END OF DOCUMENT

Page 59 ends

June 16, 2025 Attachment 2

Office of Energy Infrastructure Safety
Attention: Wildfire Safety Advisory Board (WSAB)
715 P Street, 20th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814

Re: Notice of Public Meeting on [POU] Wildfire Mitigation Plan

Dear Wildfire Safety Advisory Board,

This letter notifies the Wildfire Safety Advisory Board (“WSAB”) on May 21, 2025, the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU), a Publicly Owned Utility (POU), presented its updated Wildfire Mitigation Plan (WMP) to the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, at a publicly noticed meeting, in accordance with Public Utilities Code section 8387(b). RCMU’s Comprehensive WMP was presented on June 7, 2023 and was submitted to the WASAB on June 21, 2023. At the May 21, 2025 and June 7, 2023 meetings, RCMU provided an opportunity for public comment on its existing WMP and Rancho Cucamonga City Council verified that RCMU’s existing WMP complies with all applicable rules, regulations, and standards, as appropriate.

RCMU does not have any overhead electric supply facilities located in or near an area of the state that is designed as “extreme” or “elevated” in the California Public Utilities Commission’s High Fire Threat District Map. In consideration of this historical wildfire risk, RCMU has determined that its existing WMP adequately addresses the risk of a utility-caused, catastrophic wildfire occurring in RCMU’s service territory and that no substantive changes are merited for this reporting year. RCMU will continue to evaluate its existing WMP in relation to the wildfire risk posed by RCMU’s system on an consistent basis.

In order to provide the WSAB with information on RCMU’s system and WMP performance, please find Attachment A, an updated Informational Table, Attachment B, High Fire Threat maps, and Attachment C, an updated Metrics Table.

Thank you as RCMU and WSAB collectively work together to mitigate wildfire risks in California.

Sincerely,

Michael Parmer
Engagement and Special Programs Director

Attachments:

Attachment A – RCMU 2025 Informational
Attachment B – RCMU High Fire Threat Maps
Attachment C – RCMU 2025 Metrics Table

Page 60 ends

Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility 2025 Informational Table and maps– Attachment A Utility Description and Context Setting Table

Utility Name City of Rancho Cucamonga
Service Territory Size 4 square miles
Owned Assets 38 circuit miles of Underground Electric Distribution 42 miles of Underground Fiber Optics
Number of Customers Served 3,592 electric customer accounts Population Within Service Territory 7,400 people (est.) Customer Class Makeup
Number of Accounts Share of Total Load (MWh)
61% Residential
38% Small/Medium Business
1% Commercial/Industrial
6% Residential
59% Small/Medium Business
35% Commercial/Industrial
Service Territory
Location/Topography1
99% Urban
1% Shrub
Service Territory Wildland Urban
Interface2
(Based on total area)
0% Wildland Urban Interface
0% Wildland Urban Intermix
Percent of Service Territory in
CPUC High Fire Threat Districts
(Based on total area)
[X] Includes maps
Tier 2: 0%
Tier 3: 0%
Prevailing Wind Directions &
Speeds by Season
The Santa Ana winds typically peaks in October and concludes in the Spring. Wind speed varies, but the wind directions are typically aligned in a northeast to southwest direction.

Miles of Owned Lines
Underground and/or Overhead
Overhead Dist.: 0 miles
Overhead Trans.: 0 miles
Underground Dist.: 38 miles
Underground Trans.: 0 miles
Explanatory Note 1 - Methodology for measuring miles is based on RCMU’s final as-built distribution circuit maps.

Percent of Owned Lines in CPUC
High Fire
Threat Districts
Overhead Distribution Lines as % of Total Distribution System (Inside and Outside Service Territory)
Tier 2: 0%
Tier 3: 0%
Explanatory Note 1 – RCMU does not own any overhead lines inside or outside its service territory.

Have customers ever lost service
due to an IOU PSPS event?
☐ Yes [X] No
If yes, then provide the following data for calendar year: 2024 Number of shut-off events: 0

Page 61 ends

Customer Accounts that lost service for >10 minutes: 0
For prior response, average duration before service restored: 0

Customers have ever been notified
of a potential loss of service to due
to a forecasted IOU PSPS event?
☐ Yes [X] No
Has developed protocols to pre-
emptively shut off electricity in
response to elevated wildfire
risks?
☐ Yes [X] No
Has previously pre- emptively shut
off electricity in response to
elevated wildfire risk?
☐ Yes [X] No
If yes, then provide the following data for calendar year 2023:

Number of shut-off events: 0
Customer Accounts that lost service for >10 minutes: 0
For prior response, average duration before service restored: N/A 1 This data shall be based on the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, California Multi -Source Vegetation Layer Map, depicting WHR13 Types (Wildlife Habitat Relationship classes grouped into 13 major land cover types) available at: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=b7ec5d68d8114b1fb2bfbf4665989eb3.

2 This data shall be based on the definitions and maps maintained by the United States Department of Agriculture, as most recently assembled in the 2020 Wildland-Urban Interface of the Conterminous United States, available at https://data-usfs.hub.arcgis.com/documents/usfs::wildland-urban-interface-2020-map-service/explore

Page 62 ends

Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility High Fire Threat District Map – Attachment B Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility High Fire Threat District Map

Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility Fire Area Map with RCMU Electrical Circuits – Updated

Page 63 ends

Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility 2025 Metrics Table - Attachment C RCMU 2024 Outcome and Performance Metrics

Page 64 ends

2 8
2 2
DATE:May 21, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY:Neil Plummer, Director of Public Works
Lisa O'Brien, Public Works Business Manager
SUBJECT:Consideration of an Additional Appropriation in the Amount of $289,160 from General Fund for Updated Costs to Phase 1 of the Stadium Modernization Project. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Authorize and approve the appropriation of funds for the netting component of the project and additional expenses for construction.

2. Authorize the expenditure of $289,160.

3. Appropriate $289,160 from General Fund (F001) fund balance.

4. Approve transfer of $289,160 to F001|CC312|SC1404|PID-2168-001 Quakes Stadium Upgrades.

BACKGROUND:

In October 2022 Rancho Baseball LLC approached the City with new Major League Baseball (MBL) requirements for all Player Development League (PDL) stadiums, including LoanMart Field, home of the Rancho Cucamonga Quakes. The City and Rancho Baseball negotiated a new lease to supersede all previous leases, which was approved by the City Council on July 17, 2024, which agreed to broad terms for the substantial improvements to the stadium.

The agreement listed costs known at the time. As Phase 1 of the project wraps up, costs have become clearer. Additional costs have arisen from the required netting component and construction costs that were not included in the original agreement.

Phase 2 is anticipated as part of the FY 25-26 Major Projects Program (MPP).

ANALYSIS:

As part of the new lease agreement, the City agreed to make substantial improvements to the Stadium in order to bring the Stadium into compliance with standards currently established by MLB. The work was authorized by the City Manager to remain in compliance with MLB standards, due to the need for getting the stadium prepared for the rapidly approaching baseball season.

Page 65 ends

2 8
2 2
Facilities staff partnered with Rancho Baseball LLC to procure a contractor to expedite the required netting work in a timely manner, before Opening Day on April 4. Due to the extensive equipment, which included cranes, aerial lifts, drilling rigs and more, required to be on the field during the netting installation and the job taking multiple weeks, it had to be completed before the season began. This also had to be balanced with the routine off season facility and field maintenance, stadium bowl waterproofing and locker room expansion project.

Additionally, the other costs and savings stemming from the design, clubhouse expansion, female locker room and workout facility are now known.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Costs including development fees for Chaffey Joint Union High School District, Cucamonga School District, Cucamonga Valley Water District, environmental, site survey, bonds and insurance costs, minus savings realized throughout the process total $68,680. Costs to purchase and install netting total $220,480, for a total impact of $289,160.

Expenditure Amount
School Fees-Chaffey Comm Add $950.00
School Fees-Cucamonga $880.00
CVWD Dev Fees $330.00
CVWD Dev Fees $14,160.00
P&P Bond $47,220.00
Builder's Risk Insurance $17,140.00
Savings from A&E Design Fees -$12,000.00
Subtotal $68,680.00
Netting $220,480.00
Subtotal $220,480.00
This project was not included in the FY 2024/25 budget. Therefore, an appropriation in the amount of $289,160 is required to F001|CC312|SC1404|PID-2168-001. These costs have already been covered by realized cost savings earlier in the year from the City’s law enforcement contract related to personnel injury vacancies.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This cooperative agreement is in alignment with the City Council’s Core Values of building and preserving a family-oriented atmosphere, intentionally embracing and anticipating our future, and relentless pursuit of improvement.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Page 66 ends

DATE:May 21, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Matt Burris, Deputy City Manager
Zack Neighbors, Building and Safety Director
Lori Price, Community Improvement Supervisor
SUBJECT: Consideration of the Amendment No. 02 to Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer, Rosenblit, & Litvak, LLP for Legal Services Related to the Municipal Code and Other Civil Matters, Extending the Term of the Agreement Through September 15, 2025. (CITY) RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve the Amendment No. 02 of the Professional Services Agreement with Dapeer, Rosenblit, & Litvak, LLP, extending the term of the agreement through September 15, 2025. This amendment will continue the provision of legal services related to the enforcement of the Municipal Code, including nuisance abatement, criminal prosecution, receivership actions, and other civil matters.

BACKGROUND:

Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak, LLP (“DRL”) has over 40 years of experience representing municipalities in criminal, civil, and administrative proceedings to enforce state and local laws.

Since entering into an agreement with the City in September 2021, DRL has provided high-quality municipal prosecution services that have significantly supported the City’s code enforcement efforts. Their specialized expertise has enabled the City to address code violations efficiently, protect public health and safety, and preserve the community’s quality of life.

ANALYSIS:

Staff recommends approval of Amendment No. 02 to the existing agreement with Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak, LLP (DRL) to extend the term of services through September 15, 2025. This extension will ensure continuity in municipal code enforcement efforts and maintain the City’s access to a legal team with deep institutional knowledge and familiarity with local priorities.

DRL has represented California municipalities since 1979, bringing a strategic and innovative approach to complex code enforcement challenges. The firm has been instrumental in helping jurisdictions reduce blight, improve public safety, and implement cost-effective enforcement strategies rooted in community-based theories such as the “broken windows” approach.

The attorneys at DRL are well-versed in criminal, civil, and administrative enforcement and regularly appear before administrative bodies, trial courts, appellate courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court. Their work spans legal training, policy development, and litigation involving issues such as

Page 67 ends

Page 2 ends

2 8
2 1
property maintenance, land use, and constitutional matters, including First Amendment protections.

Approval of this amendment will allow the City to continue receiving high-caliber legal services from a team of ten attorneys, supported by paralegals and administrative staff—all licensed and qualified to practice throughout California. DRL’s ongoing support also ensures the City has conflict-free legal representation available when necessary.

FISCAL IMPACT:

No additional appropriations are required at this time. The cost of services provided under this agreement has been budgeted for Fiscal Years 2024/25 and 2025/26 within existing accounts designated for civil litigation and criminal prosecution. Additionally, in accordance with the California Government Code and the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code, Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak, LLP actively pursues cost recovery for enforcement actions, helping to offset expenses incurred in bringing properties into compliance.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

This item supports the City Council’s Core Values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all. The continued partnership with Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak, LLP provides the City with essential legal services to effectively combat blight and uphold neighborhood standards. .

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Amendment No. 2 to Professional (Legal) Services Agreement #2021-116

Page 68 ends

1 AMENDMENT NO. 002 TO
PROFESSIONAL (LEGAL) SERVICES AGREEMENT #2021-116

BETWEEN

DAPEER, ROSENBLIT & LITVAK LLP
AND

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA

THIS AMENDMENT No. 00 2 (“Amendment”) is entered into on April 3, 2025, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a California municipal corporation (“City”) and Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak LLP (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to as the “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.

City and Firm entered into Professional (Legal) Services Agreement (#2021-116) for City Prosecutor/Code enforcement Attorney Services on or about September 15, 2021 (“Agreement”); and
Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of the Agreement, the original term of the Agreement was for one (1) year, unless terminated earlier as provided in the Agreement; and Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of the Agreement, the Agreement may be renewed in one (1) year increments for a total of three (3) years by written amendment signed by the City Manager and the Consultant; and
The Agreement remains in effect, and the Parties now wish to renew the Agreement for an additional year - through and including September 15, 2025.

All other Terms and Conditions of the original Agreement will remain in full effect.

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties, through their respective representatives, have executed this Amendment by way of signature of both parties and on the date indicated below.

Please return one (1) original signed copy to the City no later than April 3, 2025. The City will process both copies for signature and provide Consultant with one (1) fully executed copy of the Amendment.

City of Rancho Cucamonga Dapeer, Rosenblit & Litvak LLP

By: By:

John Gillison, James Eckart,
City Manager Partner

Date: Date:

Page 69 ends

DATE: May 21, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena Perez, Principal Engineer
Lelani Gnaster, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration to Award a Contract with Gentry Brothers Inc. in the Amount of $158,890, Plus a 10% Contingency of $15,890, for the Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard Storm Drain Project. This Project is Exempt from the Requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Per Government Code Section 15301(c)(1) - Existing Facilities. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve the plans and specifications for the Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard Storm Drain Project (Project), on file with the City Engineer;

2. Accept the bids received for the Project;

3. Award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $158,890 to the lowest responsive bidder Gentry Brothers Inc., for the total bid amount; and

4. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency for the construction contract in the amount of $15,890.

BACKGROUND:

The intersection of Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard has experienced flooding during rain events in recent years since the extension of Feron Boulevard to Hellman Avenue. The Project will address these flooding issues by installing a new storm drain catch basin and lateral on Feron Boulevard that will connect into the storm drain mainline on Hellman Avenue. This catch basin will capture storm water that currently surface flows through the new developments on Feron Boulevard, reducing the potential for flooding.

ANALYSIS:

The Project will construct a storm drain lateral, catch basin, and minor concrete and asphalt repairs. The contract documents specify twenty (20) working days to complete this construction.

The Notice Inviting Bids was released to the general contracting community and was published in the Daily Bulletin newspaper on April 22 and April 29, 2025. The City Clerk’s office facilitated

Page 70 ends

Page 2 ends

2 7
2 8
the formal solicitation for bids on May 6, 2025. The City Clerk’s office received three (3) construction bids. The Engineer’s estimate for the Project was $140,000. The apparent lowest responsive bid was submitted by Gentry Brothers Inc. in the amount of $158,890. A full bid summary is included as Attachment 2.

Engineering staff has reviewed all bids received and found all to be complete and in compliance with the bid requirements with any irregularities to be inconsequential. Staff has completed the required background investigation and finds the lowest responsive bidder, Gentry Brothers Inc., meets all bid documents requirements.

ENVIRONMENTAL:

Staff has determined that the Project is Categorically Exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Section 15301 “Existing Facilities” subsection (c), Class 1.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Anticipated construction costs are estimated to be as follows:

Expenditure Category Amount
Construction Contract $158,890
Construction Contract Contingency (10%) $15,890
Construction Inspection Services* $29,080
Soils and Material Testing Services* $15,600
Estimated Construction Costs $219,460
* Construction Inspection and Soils & Materials testing is estimated to be approximately 28% of the base construction contract.

A total of $226,490 was budgeted in the Fiscal Year 2024/25 Budget for this Project, consisting of funds from the Drainage General Fund (112). From this available budget, funds will be allocated for this project as identified under the Capital Improvement Project Account number listed below:

Account No. Funding Source Description Amount
F112 CC307 SC7004
PID 2166-112
Drainage General
Fund
Hellman Avenue and Feron
Boulevard Storm Drain Project
$219,460
Total Project Funding $219,460
Any excess funds will be returned to fund balances for the associated fund at the end of the fiscal year and will be available for use on future projects.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

The Project meets our City Council core values by promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all, and by providing continuous improvement through the construction of high- quality public improvements.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Vicinity Map
Attachment 2 – Bid Summary

Page 71 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
5 6
4 0

HELLMAN AVE AND FERON BLVD STORM DRAIN PROJECT VICINITY MAP

NOT TO SCALE
Project Intersection:

Hellman Ave and Feron Blvd
City Boundary:

Page 72 ends

ATTACHMENT 2

UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID UNIT BID

NO QTY UNIT DESCRIPTION COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT COST AMOUNT 1 1 LS Mobilization $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $5,700.00 $5,700.00$50,000.00 $50,000.00 2 1 LS Clearing, Grubbing, Including Removal and Disposal $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $33,290.00 $33,290.00 $1,960.00 $1,960.00$15,000.00 $15,000.00 3 1 LS Pothole All Existing Utilities Crossing Proposed Storm Drain Prior to Excavation$5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $14,300.00 $14,300.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 4 1 EA Construct Curb Opening Catch Basin Per City Standard Drawing No. 300, W=21'$25,000.00 $25,000.00$18,000.00 $18,000.00 $44,000.00 $44,000.00$30,000.00 $30,000.00 5 1 EA Construct Monolithic Catch Basin Connection Per City Standard Drawing No. 308$5,000.00 $5,000.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 6 1 EA Construct Local Depression Per City Standard Drawing No. 307, Case A$5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $3,800.00 $3,800.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 7 1 EA Construct Junction Structure No. 2 Per City Standard Drawing No. 331$10,000.00 $10,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $9,500.00 $9,500.00$35,000.00 $35,000.00 8 96 LF Install 36-Inch Diameter RCP (2000D). Trench Backfill and Paving per City Standard$650.00 $62,400.00 $250.00 $24,000.00 $1,100.00 $105,600.00 $600.00 $57,600.00 9 1 LS Striping $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $10,600.00 $10,600.00 $10,600.00 $10,600.00 $8,900.00 $8,900.00 10 1 LS Traffic Control $10,000.00 $10,000.00$40,000.00 $40,000.00 $14,400.00 $14,400.00$25,000.00 $25,000.00 TOTAL BASE BID AMOUNT: $138,400.00 $158,890.00 $214,260.00 $236,500.00

WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION
ENGINEERING CORP.

BASE BID
3BID SUMMARY: BID DATE: _____05/06/2025______

ENGINEER'S ESTIMATEHELLMAN AVENUE AND FERON BOULEVARD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT GENTRY GENERAL ENGINEERING INC.

APPARENT LOW BIDDER
GENTRY BROTHERS INC.
2

Page 73 ends

Page 1 of 2 ends

REVISION:

On May 6, 2025, bids were opened for the Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard Storm Drain Improvement Project (Project). A total of three (3) construction bids were received at the bid opening in City Hall . City staff determined the apparent lowest responsive bid der to be Gentry Brothers Inc., in the amount of $158,890.

On May 15, 2025, the City Clerk’s Office received a bid protest letter from Gentry General Engineering Inc. (Protester). The letter claimed that the bid should be deemed non-responsive for the following reasons:
• The signature on the bid bond is dated April 24, 2025; however, the accompanying notarial acknowledgement is dated May 6, 2025. Because the acknowledgement postdates the signature, the Protestor claims that it fails to legally validate the signature, rendering the bid bond non-notarized and the bid nonresponsive.
• The bid bond is missing both the required corporate seal and the principal signer’s title, rendering the bond incomplete.
• The Bidder Agreement mandates listing the names of the President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Manager of the corporation, but Gentry Brother’s Inc. only listed the Secretary and Treasurer, making the Bidder Agreement incomplete and nonresponsive.

The protest letter is included as Attachment 1.

Gentry Brother’s Inc. provide a formal response to the protest letter indicating that they believe the comments made by the Protestor hold no validity for the following reasons:
• The National Notary Associate, along with the note at top of the provided “California Acknowledgement Form” attached to the Bid Bond, states that notary public only certify and verify the identity of the individual who signs a document. The documents do not have to be signed on the same day of notarization. Bid documents were prepared for submittal on April 24, 2025. Bid documents were completed on May 6, 2025. • The resolution of scanned files of the Bid documents did not show the corporate seal however the original files on file with the City Clerk do have the corporate seal.

DATE: May 21, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager

BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Marlena C. Perez, Principal Engineer
Krystal Lai, Associate Engineer
SUBJECT: Bid Protest Letter from Gentry General Engineering Inc. and Response Letter from Gentry Brothers Inc. for the Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard Storm Drain Improvement Project. (CITY)

MEMORANDUM
Engineering Services Department
Staff Report Memo: 5/21/2025 Item D7 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM

Page 74 ends

Page 2 of 2 ends

• A corporate resolution was appended to the bid documents . Wayne Gentry is CEO, Secretary and Treasurer of Gentry Brothers, Inc.

The response letter is included as Attachment 2.

Engineering staff has reviewed both the protest letter and the response letter. Staff have determined that the bid package submitted by Gentry Brother’s Inc. is responsive and in accordance with the bid requirements , with any irregularities being inconsequential. Gentry Brother’s Inc. is therefore still the apparent lowest responsive bidder for the Project.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Receive and file this Memorandum and item D7 of the Consent Calendar, waive any minor irregularities,

2. Approve the plans and specifications for the Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard Storm Drain Project (Project), on file with the City Engineer;

3. Accept the bids received for the Project;

4. Award and authorize the execution of a contract in the amount of $158,890 to the lowest responsive bidder Gentry Brother’s Inc., for the total bid amount;

5. Authorize the expenditure of a 10% contingency for the construction contract, in the amount of $15,890;

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Protest Letter from Gentry General Engineering Inc.

Attachment 2 – Response Letter from Gentry Brother’s Inc.

Page 75 ends

From: Dean Bates
To: Lai, Krystal
Cc: City Clerk; [email protected]; [email protected]; Brenton Gentry; Alicia Sanchez; Andrea Scarbrough
Subject: Bid Protest - Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard Storm Drain Improvement Date: Thursday, May 15, 2025 12:34:34 PM
You don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this is important CAUTION: This email is from outside our Corporate network. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and can confirm the content is safe.

Good afternoon,
On May 7, 2025, we filed a Public Records Request for the bid documents submitted on May 6 by Gentry Brothers Inc for the Hellman Avenue and Feron Boulevard Storm Drain Improvement Project. We received the requested documents on May 13. Upon review, we believe that the bid submitted by Gentry Brothers Inc should be rejected as nonresponsive on the following grounds:

1. Wayne Gentry's signature on the bid bond is dated April 24, 2025, though the attached notarial acknowledgment for said signature is dated May 6. The acknowledgment thus fails as a legal validation of the subject signature, and the bid bond must be deemed non- notarized and thereby nonresponsive.

2. The required corporate seal and principal signer title are both absent from the bid bond.

The bid bond is therefore incomplete and nonresponsive.

3. The Bidder Agreement requires that a corporate bidder list the names of the President, Secretary, Treasurer, and Manager of the corporation. Only the Secretary and Treasurer are listed, thus rendering the Bidder Agreement incomplete and nonresponsive.

Thank you,
Dean Bates
Dean Bates
Email: [email protected]
320 W Tropica Rancho Rd
Colton, CA 92324

Page 76 ends

Page 77 ends

Page 78 ends

DATE: May 21, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Michael Parmer, Director of Engagement and Special Programs SUBJECT: Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Willdan Engineering for Consulting Services on the City Electric System Infrastructure in the Amount of $172,800. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve an agreement with Willdan Engineering to provide professional consulting services for RCMU on the City’s electric system infrastructure.

BACKGROUND:

A recent vacancy in staffing at the professional management level within the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Utility (RCMU) has created a skills and technical knowledge gap in the division that will likely take a minimum of several months to fill through the recruitment process. Electric utilities are highly regulated and require specialized expertise to navigate and interpret regulations, oversee power resource requirements and schedule power resource needs, review electrical utility rate structures, and more.

Further, there are critical upcoming projects that need specialized knowledge to ensure they are supported from design through construction. One such project is the development of a second substation. RCMU’s first substation was built in 2003 when RCMU first began providing electric services to customers. The current substation is approaching its capacity limit and building a second substation will allow RCMU to accommodate future growth.

ANALYSIS:

For over 30 years, Willdan Engineering has assisted over 90 local governments and utilities to deliver energy efficiency, load capacity procurement, new construction, and demand response.

Willdan runs electric utility operations primarily on the east coast of the United States; however, they have an extensive network of utility experts that they can leverage to meet the needs of RCMU. Contracting with Willdan Engineering will enable RCMU to leverage their expertise in the operation and maintenance of RCMU’s electric system infrastructure, provide input and direction on utility system extensions (such as the second substation), and advise on RCMU’s electrical utility rate structure.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The cost for these services is for an amount not-to-exceed $172,800 and will be partially offset by salary savings due to the vacancy of the Deputy Director for Electric Utility Services position.

Additional expenses will be covered through the Purchased Power account (F706 SC1409).

Page 79 ends

Page 2 ends

2 8
3 1
COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s core value for promoting and enhancing a safe and healthy community for all by ensuring that the City’s electric infrastructure is well-maintained, reliable, and is able to serve the needs of customers, while growing strategically.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Professional Services Agreement

Page 80 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 1 Last Revised: 11/12/2020

AGREEMENT FOR

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 21 day of May, 2025, by and between the City of Rancho Cucamonga, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Willdan Engineering, a California Corporation (“Consultant”).

RECITALS
A. City has heretofore issued its request for proposals to perform the following professional services: Consulting services on the input and direction on the operation and maintenance of the City’s electric system infrastructure (“the Project”).

B. Consultant has submitted a proposal to perform the professional services described in Recital “A”, above, necessary to complete the Project.

C. City desires to engage Consultant to complete the Project in the manner set forth and more fully described herein.

D. Consultant represents that it is fully qualified and licensed under the laws of the State of California to perform the services contemplated by this Agreement in a good and professional manner.

AGREEMENT
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of performance by the parties of the mutual promises, covenants, and conditions herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:

1. Consultant’s Services.

1.1 Scope and Level of Services . Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement, City hereby engages Consultant to perform all technical and professional services described in Recitals “A” and “B” above, including, but not limited to Professional Consulting Services , all as more fully set forth in the Consultant’s proposal, dated April 18, 2025 and entitled “Scope of Work”, attached hereto as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated by reference herein. The nature, scope, and level of the services required to be performed by Consultant are set forth in the Scope of Work and are referred to herein as “the Services.” In the event of any inconsistencies between the Scope of Work and this Agreement, the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall control.

1.2 Revisions to Scope of Work . Upon request of the City, the Consultant will promptly meet with City staff to discuss any revisions to the Project desired by the City. Consultant agrees that the Scope of Work may be amended based upon said meetings, and, by amendment to this Agreement, the parties may agree on a

Page 81 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 2 Last Revised: 11/12/2020
revision or revisions to Consultant’s compensation based thereon. A revision pursuant to this Section that does not increase the total cost payable to Consultant by more than ten percent (10%) of the total compensation specified in Section 3, may be approved in writing by City’s City Manager without amendment.

1.3 Time for Performance. Consultant shall perform all services under this Agreement in a timely, regular basis consistent with industry standards for professional skill and care, and in accordance with any schedule of performance set forth in the Scope of Work, or as set forth in a “Schedule of Performance”, if such Schedule is attached hereto as Exhibit “B”.

1.4 Standard of Care . As a material inducement to City to enter into this Agreement, Consultant hereby represents that it has the experience necessary to undertake the services to be provided. In light of such status and experience, Consultant hereby covenants that it shall follow the customary professional standards in performing the Services.

1.5 Familiarity with Services . By executing this Agreement, Consultant represents that, to the extent required by the standard of practice, Consultant (a) has investigated and considered the scope of services to be performed, (b) has carefully considered how the services should be performed, and (c) understands the facilities, difficulties and restrictions attending performance of the services under this Agreement. Consultant represents that Consultant, to the extent required by the standard of practice, has investigated any areas of work, as applicable, and is reasonably acquainted with the conditions therein. Should Consultant discover any latent or unknown conditions, which will materially affect the performance of services, Consultant shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Consultant’s risk until written instructions are received from the City Representative.

2. Term of Agreement . The term of this Agreement shall be one (1) year and shall become effective as of the date of the mutual execution by way of both parties signature (the “Effective Date”). No work shall be conducted; service or goods will not be provided until this Agreement has been executed and above requirements have been fulfilled.

Parties to this Agreement shall have the option to renew in one (1) year increments to a total of three (3) years, unless sooner terminated as provided in Section 1 4 herein.

Options to renew are contingent upon the City Manager’s approval, subject to pricing review, and in accordance with all Terms and Conditions stated herein unless otherwise provided in writing by the City.

3. Compensation.

3.1 Compensation. City shall compensate Consultant as set forth in Exhibit A, provided, however, that full, total and complete amount payable to Consultant shall not exceed $172,800 (one-hundred-seventy-two-thousand-eight-hundred), including

Page 82 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 3 Last Revised: 11/12/2020
all out of pocket expenses, unless additional compensation is approved by the City Council. City shall not withhold any federal, state or other taxes, or other deductions.

However, City shall withhold not more than ten percent (10%) of any invoice amount pending receipt of any deliverables reflected in such invoice. Under no circumstance shall Consultant be entitled to compensation for services not yet satisfactorily performed.

The parties further agree that compensation may be adjusted in accordance with Section 1.2 to reflect subsequent changes to the Scope of Services. City shall compensate Consultant for any authorized extra services as set forth in Exhibit A.

4. Method of Payment.

4.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit to City monthly invoices for the Services performed pursuant to this Agreement. The invoices shall describe in detail the Services rendered during the period and shall separately describe any authorized extra services. Any invoice claiming compensation for extra services shall include appropriate documentation of prior authorization of such services. All invoices shall be remitted to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California.

4.2 City shall review such invoices and notify Consultant in writing within ten (10) business days of any disputed amounts.

4.3 City shall pay all undisputed portions of the invoice within thirty (30) calendar days after receipt of the invoice up to the not-to-exceed amounts set forth in Section 3.

4.4 All records, invoices, time cards, cost control sheets and other records maintained by Consultant relating to services hereunder shall be available for review and audit by the City.

5. Representatives.

5.1 City Representative . For the purposes of this Agreement, the contract administrator and City’s representative shall be Michael Parmer, Director of Engagement and Special Programs , or such other person as designated in writing by the City (“City Representative”). It shall be Consultant’s responsibility to assure that the City Representative is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the services, and Consultant shall refer any decisions that must be made by City to the City Representative. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the City Representative.

5.2 Consultant Representative . For the purposes of this Agreement, Vanessa Munoz, President/CEO is hereby designated as the principal and representative of Consultant authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith (“Consultant’s Representative”). It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability and reputation of the Consultant’s Representative were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the Consultant’s Representative shall be responsible during the

Page 83 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 4 Last Revised: 11/12/2020
term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Consultant and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the services hereunder. Consultant may not change the Responsible Principal without the prior written approval of City.

6. Consultant’s Personnel.

6.1 All Services shall be performed by Consultant or under Consultant’s direct supervision, and all personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform such Services, including, without limitation, a City business license as required by the City’s Municipal Code.

6.2 Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the standard of care set forth in Section 1.4.

6.3 Consultant shall be responsible for payment of all employees’ and subcontractors’ wages and benefits, and shall comply with all requirements pertaining to employer’s liability, workers’ compensation, unemployment insurance, and Social Security. Consultant shall be responsible for all reports and obligations respecting such additional personnel, including, but not limited to: Social Security taxes, other retirement or pension benefits, income tax withholding, unemployment insurance, disability insurance, and workers' compensation insurance. Notwithstanding any other agency, State, or federal policy, rule, regulation, statute or ordinance to the contrary, Consultant and its officers, employees, agents, and subcontractors providing any of the Services under this Agreement shall not become entitled to, and hereby waive any claims to, any wages, salaries, compensation, benefit or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to, eligibility to enroll in, or reinstate to membership in, the California Public Employees Retirement System (“PERS”) or any other retirement program, as an employee of City, and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions or employee contributions for PERS benefits or any other retirement benefits. By its execution of this Agreement, Consultant certifies that it is aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the California Labor Code that require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self -insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the Services.

6.4 Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and its elected officials, officers and employees, servants, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city or agency officials, from any and all liability, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from Consultant’s violations of personnel practices and/or any violation of the California Labor Code. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section 6.

Page 84 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 5 Last Revised: 11/12/2020

6.5 PERS Requirements . The Parties acknowledge that City is a local agency member of PERS, and as such has certain pension reporting and contribution obligations to PERS on behalf of qualifying employees. Consultant agrees that, in providing its employees and any other personnel to City to perform any work or other Services under this Agreement, Consultant shall assure compliance with the Public Employees’ Retirement Law, commencing at Government Code § 20000, the regulations of PERS, and the Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013, as amended. Without limitation to the foregoing, Consultant shall assure compliance with regard to personnel who have active or inactive membership in PERS and to those who are retired annuitants and in performing this Agreement shall not assign or utilize any of its personnel in a manner that will cause City to be in violation of the applicable r etirement laws and regulations.

6.6 Consultant agrees to follow the provisions of the Affordable Care Act and shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for the payment of any Affordable Care Act penalties, fines, damages, assessments, awards, judgements, or charges that the City may incur as a result of Consultant or any employees, agent, subcontractor of Consultant, or subcontractor’s employee providing services under this Contract and payment of reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by the City in relation thereto.

6.7 Consultant agrees to follow the provisions of the California Paid Sick Leave Law (AB 1522) and shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for the payment of any related penalties, fines, damages, assessments, awards, judgements, or charges that the City may incur as a result of Consultant or any employees, agent, subcontractor of Consultant, or subcontractor’s employee providing services under this Contract and payment of reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by the City in relation thereto.

6.8 Consultant agrees to follow all applicable provisions of federal, state, and local law, statute and regulation in performance of this contract as it relates to employment of employees or otherwise, including but not limited to, the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act and proper withholding of taxes, and shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City for the payment of any penalties, fines, damages, assessments, awards, judgements, or charges that the City may incur as a result of Consultant or any employees, agent, subcontractor of Consultant, or subcontractor’s employee providing services under this Contract and payment of reasonable attorneys’ fees incurred by the City in relation thereto.

6.9 To the maximum extent permitted by laws, Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City and other Indemnitees (as defined in Section 11.1 herein), from any and all liabilities, damages, claims, costs and expenses of any nature to the extent arising from, caused by, or relating to Consultant’s violation of any provision of this Section 6, or any of Consultant’s personnel practices. In addition to all other remedies at law, City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any fees due to Consultant under this Agreement any amount due to City from Consultant as a result of Consultant’s failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or

Page 85 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 6 Last Revised: 11/12/2020
indemnification obligation arising under this Section. The duty of indemnification set forth in this S

7. Ownership of Work Product.

7.1 Ownership. All documents, ideas, concepts, electronic files, drawings, photographs and any and all other writings, including drafts thereof, prepared, created or provided by Consultant in the course of performing the Services, including any and all intellectual and proprietary rights arising from the creation of the same (collectively, “Work Product”), are considered to be “works made for hire” for the benefit of the City. Upon payment being made, and provided Consultant is not in breach of this Agreement, all Work Product shall be and remain the property of City without restriction or limitation upon its use or dissemination by City. Basic survey notes, sketches, charts, computations and similar data prepared or obtained by Consultant under this Agreement shall, upon request, be made available to City. None of the Work Product shall be the subject of any common law or statutory copyright or copyright application by Consultant. In the event of the return of any of the Work Product to Consultant or its representative, Consultant shall be responsible for its safe return to City. Under no circumstances shall Consultant fail to deliver any draft or final designs, plans, drawings, reports or specifications to City upon written demand by City for their delivery, notwithstanding any disputes between Consultant and City concerning payment, performance of the contract, or otherwise. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement. City’s reuse of the Work Product for any purpose other than the Project, shall be at City’s sole risk.

7.2. Assignment of Intellectual Property Interests: Upon execution of this Agreement and to the extent not otherwise conveyed to City by Section 7.1, above, the Consultant shall be deemed to grant and assign to City, and shall require all of its subcontractors to assign to City, all ownership rights, and all common law and statutory copyrights, trademarks, and other intellectual and proprietary property rights relating to the Work Product and the Project itself, and Consultant shall disclaim and retain no rights whatsoever as to any of the Work Product, to the maximum extent permitted by law.

City shall be entitled to utilize the Work Product for any and all purposes, including but not limited to constructing, using, maintaining, altering, adding to, restoring, rebuilding and publicizing the Project or any aspect of the Project.

7.3 Title to Intellectual Property . Consultant warrants and represents that it has secured all necessary licenses, consents or approvals to use any instrumentality, thing or component as to which any intellectual property right exists, including computer software, used in the rendering of the Services and the production of the Work Product and/or materials produced under this Agreement, and that City has full legal title to and the right to reproduce any of the Work Product. Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city officials, harmless from any loss, claim or liability in any way related to a claim that City’s use is violating federal, state or local laws, or any contractual provisions, relating to trade names, licenses, franchises, patents or other means of

Page 86 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 7 Last Revised: 11/12/2020
protecting intellectual property rights and/or interests in products or inventions.

Consultant shall bear all costs arising from the use of patented, copyrighted, trade secret or trademarked documents, materials, software, equipment, devices or processes used or incorporated in the Services and materials produced under this Agreement. In the event City’s use of any of the Work Product is held to constitute an infringement and any use thereof is enjoined, Consultant, at its expense, shall: (a) secure for City the right to continue using the Work Product by suspension of any injunction or by procuring a license or licenses for City; or (b) modify the Work Product so that it becomes non - infringing. This covenant shall survive the termination of this Agreement.

8. Status as Independent Contractor . Consultant is, and shall at all times remain as to City, a wholly independent contractor. Consultant shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City or otherwise act as an agent of City. Neither City nor any of its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant’s employees, except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not, at any time, or in any manner, represent that it or any of its officers, agents or employees are in any manner employees of City. Consultant shall pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Consultant under this Agreement, and to defend, indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement.

Consultant shall fully comply with the workers’ compensation law regarding Consultant and Consultant’s employees.

8.1 All work and other Services provided pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed by Consultant or by Consultant’s employees or other personnel under Consultant’s supervision, and Consultant and all of Consultant’s personnel shall possess the qualifications, permits, and licenses required by State and local law to perform the Services, including, without limitation, a City of Rancho Cucamonga business license as required by the Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code.

Consultant will determine the means, methods, and details by which Consultant’s personnel will perform the Services. Consultant shall be solely responsible for the satisfactory work performance of all personnel engaged in performing the Services and compliance with the customary professional standards.

8.2 None of Consultant’s employees and/or other personnel performing any of the Services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall be employees of City and shall at all times be under Consultant’s exclusive direction and control. Consultant and Consultant’s personnel shall not supervise any of City’s employees; and City’s employees shall not supervise Consultant’s personnel.

Consultant’s personnel shall not wear or display any City uniform, badge, identification number, or other information iden tifying such individual as an employee of City; and Consultant’s personnel shall not use any City e -mail address or City telephone number in the performance of any of the Services under this Agreement. Consultant shall acquire and maintain at its sole cost and expense such vehicles, equipment and supplies as Consultant’s personnel require to perform any of the Services required by this Agreement. Consultant shall perform all Services off of City premises at locations of Consultant’s choice, except as otherwise may from time to time be necessary in order for

Page 87 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 8 Last Revised: 11/12/2020
Consultant’s personnel to receive projects from City, review plans on file at City, pick up or deliver any work product related to Consultant’s performance of any Services under this Agreement, or as may be necessary to inspect or visit City locations and/or private property to perform such Services. City may make a computer available to Consultant from time to time for Consultant’s personnel to obtain information about or to check on the status of projects pertaining to the Services under this Agreement.

9. Confidentiality. Consultant may have access to financial, accounting, statistical, and personnel data of individuals and City employees. Consultant covenants that all data, documents, discussion, or other information developed or received by Consultant or provided for performance of this Agreement are confidential and shall not be disclosed by Consultant without prior written authorization by City. City shall grant such authorization if applicable law requires disclosure. All City data shall be returned to City upon the termination of this Agreement. Consultant’s covenant under this section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. This provision shall not apply to information in whatever form that is in the public domain, nor shall it restrict the Consultant from giving notices required by law or complying with an order to provide information or data when such an order is issued by a court, administrative agency or other legitimate authority, or if disclosure is otherwise permitted by law and reasonably necessary for the Consultant to defend itself from any legal action or claim.

10. Conflict of Interest.

10.1 Consultant covenants that it presently has no interest and shall not acquire any interest, direct or indirect, which may be affected by the Services, or which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services. Consultant further covenants that, in performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it. Furthermore, Consultant shall avoid the appearance of having any interest, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of the Services.

Consultant shall not accept any employment or representation during the term of this Agreement which is or may likely make Consultant “financially interested” (as provided in California Government Code §§1090 and 87100) in any decision made by City on any matter in connection with which Consultant has been retained. Consultant or its employees may be required to disclose financial interests that may foreseeably be materially affected by the work performed under this Agreement pursuant to California Government Code § 87100 et seq and regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission.

10.2 Consultant further represents that it has not employed or retained any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, to solicit or obtain this Agreement. Consultant has not paid or agreed to pay any person or entity, other than a bona fide employee working exclusively for Consultant, any fee, commission, gift, percentage, or any other consideration contingent upon the execution of this Agreement. Upon any breach or violation of this warranty, City shall have th e right, at its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement without further liability, or

Page 88 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 9 Last Revised: 11/12/2020
to deduct from any sums payable to Consultant hereunder the full amount or value of any such fee, commission, percentage or gift.

10.3 Consultant has no knowledge that any officer or employee of City has any interest, whether contractual, noncontractual, financial, proprietary, or otherwise, in this transaction or in the business of Consultant, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of Consultant at any time during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall immediately make a complete, written disclosure of such interest to City, even if such interest would not be deemed a prohibited “conflict of interest” under applicable laws as described in subsection 10.1.

11. Indemnification.

11.1 Professional Services. In connection with its professional services, the Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city or agency officials, (collectively, “Indemnitees”), with respect to any and all damages, liabilities, losses, reasonable defense costs or expenses (collectively, “Claims”), including but not limited to liability for death or injury to any person and injury to any property, to the extent the same out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in the performance of its professional services under this Agreement. Consultant shall reimburse all reasonable defense costs and expenses, including actual attorney’s fees and experts’ costs incurred in connection with such defense.

11.2 Other Indemnities. In connection with all Claims not covered by Section 11.1, the Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees with respect to any and all Claims including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the non-professional acts, omissions, activities or operations of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, consultants, or agents in the performance of this Agreement. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Claims with counsel approved by City, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including actual attorney’s fees and experts’ costs incurred in connection with such defense.

11.3 Nonwaiver of Rights. Indemnitees do not, and shall not, waive any rights that they may possess against Consultant because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City, of any insurance policy or certificate required pursuant to this Agreement.

11.4 Waiver of Right of Subrogation . Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Agreement, Consultant, on behalf of itself and all parties claiming under or through it, hereby waives all rights of subrogation against the Indemnitees, while acting within the scope of their duties, from all claims, losses and liabilities arising out of or incident to activities or operations performed by or on behalf of the Consultant.

Page 89 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 10 Last Revised: 11/12/2020

11.5 Survival. The provisions of this Section 1 1 shall survive the termination of the Agreement and are in addition to any other rights or remedies which Indemnitees may have under the law. Payment is not required as a condition precedent to an Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision, and an entry of judgment against Consultant shall be conclusive in favor of the Indemnitee’s right to recover under this indemnity provision.

12. Insurance.

12.1 Liability Insurance. Consultant shall procure and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the services hereunder by Consultant, and/or its agents, representatives, employees and subcontractors.

12.2 Minimum Scope of Insurance. Unless otherwise approved by City, coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed.
1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). (3) Worker’s Compensation insurance as required by the State of California, and Employer’s Liability Insurance.
(4) Professional Liability insurance in a form approved by the City, having an extended reporting period of not less than three (3) years; or Professional Liability insurance shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after completion of the Services which shall, during the entire three (3) year period, provide protection against claims of professional negligence arising out of Consultant’s performance of the Services and otherwise complying with all applicable
provisions of this Section 13. Either policy shall be endorsed to include contractual liability to the extent insurable.

12.3 Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) Commercial General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.

Commercial General Liability Insurance with a general
aggregate limit shall apply separately to this Agreement or

Page 90 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 11 Last Revised: 11/12/2020
the general limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $2,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
(3) Employer’s Liability: $1,000,000 per accident and in the aggregate for bodily injury or disease and Workers’
Compensation Insurance in the amount required by law.
(4) Professional Liability: $1,000,000 per claim/aggregate.

12.4 Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self - insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City.

12.5 Other Insurance Provisions.
(1) The commercial general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain the following provisions on a
separate additionally insured endorsement naming the City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city or agency officials, are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant; products and completed
operations of Consultant; premises owned, occupied or
used by Consultant; and/or automobiles owned, leased,
hired or borrowed by Consultant. The coverage shall
contain no limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City or agency officials which are not also limitations applicable to the named insured.
(2) For any claims related to this Agreement, Consultant’s insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects City, its officers, officials, employees, designated
volunteers and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city or agency officials. Any insurance or self - insurance maintained by City, their officers, officials, employees, designated volunteers or agents serving as
independent contractors in the role of city or agency
officials shall be excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.
(3) Consultant’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought,
except with respect to the limits of the insurer’s liability.

Page 91 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 12 Last Revised: 11/12/2020
(4) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after 30 days prior written notice by first class mail has been given to City (ten (10) days prior written notice for non-payment of premium). Consultant shall provide thirty (30) days written notice to City prior to implementation of a reduction of limits or material change of insurance
coverage as specified herein.

(5) Each insurance policy, required by this clause shall expressly waive the insurer’s right of subrogation against City and its elected officials, officers, employees, servants, attorneys, designated volunteers, and agents serving as independent contractors in the role of city or agency
officials.
(6) Be issued by an insurance company approved in writing by City, which is admitted and licensed to do business in the State of California and which is rated A:VII or better according to the most recent A.M. Best Co. Rating
Guide.

(7) Specify that any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the required policy, including breaches of warranty, shall not affect the coverage required to be
provided.

(8) Specify that any and all costs of adjusting and/or defending any claim against any insured, including court costs and attorneys' fees, shall be paid in addition to and shall not deplete any policy limits.

(9) Other required insurance, endorsements, or exclusions as required by the City in any request for proposals applicable to this Agreement.

12.6 Evidence of coverage. Prior to commencing performance under this Agreement, the Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates and original endorsements, or copies of each required policy, effecting and evidencing the insurance coverage required by this Agreement. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements or policies shall be received and approved by the City before Consultant commences performance.

If performance of this Agreement shall extend beyond one year, Consultant shall provide City with the required policies or endorsements evidencing renewal of the required policies of insurance prior to the expiration of any required policies of insurance.

Page 92 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 13 Last Revised: 11/12/2020

13. Cooperation. In the event any claim or action is brought against City relating to Consultant’s performance or services rendered under this Agreement, Consultant shall render any reasonable assistance and cooperation that City might require. City shall compensate Consultant for any litigation support services in an amount to be agreed upon by the parties.

14. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement at any time for any or no reason on not less than ten (10 ) days prior written notice to Consultant. In the event City exercises its right to terminate this Agreement, City shall pay Consultant for any services satisfactorily rendered prior to the effective date of the termination, provided Consultant is not then in breach of this Agreement. Consultant shall have no other claim against City by reason of such termination, including any claim for compensation. City may terminate for cause following a default remaining uncured more than five (5) business days after service of a notice to cure on the breaching party.

Consultant may terminate this Agreement for cause upon giving the City ten (10) business days prior written notice for any of the following: (1) uncured breach by the City of any material term of this Agreement, including but not limited to Payment Terms; (2) material changes in the conditions under which this Agreement was entered into, coupled with the failure of the parties to reach accord on the fees and charges for any Additional Services required because of such changes.

15. Notices. Any notices, bills, invoices, or reports authorized or required by this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed received on (a) the day of delivery if delivered by hand or overnight courier service during Consultant’s and City’s regular business hours; or (b) on the third business day following deposit in the United States mail, postage prepaid, to the addresses set forth in this section, or to such other addresses as the parties may, from time to time, designate in writing pursuant to the provisions of this section.

All notices shall be addressed as follows:

If to City: Michael Parmer
Director of Engagement and Special Programs
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
If to Consultant: Vanessa Munoz, President/CEO
650 E. Hospitality Lane, Suite 400
San Bernardino, CA 92408

16. Non-Discrimination and Equal Employment Opportunity. In the performance of this Agreement, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee, subcontractor, or applicant for employment because of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation. Consultant will take affirmative action to ensure that

Page 93 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 14 Last Revised: 11/12/2020
subcontractors and applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during employment, without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, ancestry, age, physical or mental handicap, medical condition, or sexual orientation.

17. Assignment and Subcontracting. Consultant shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement or subcontract the performance of any of Consultant’s obligations hereunder without City’s prior written consent. Except as provided herein, any attempt by Consultant to so assign, transfer, or subcontract any rights, duties, or obligations arising hereunder shall be null, void and of no effect. 18 Compliance with Laws . Consultant shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws, ordinances, codes and regulations in force at the time Consultant performs the Services. CONSULTANT is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Section 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 16000, et seq., (“Prevailing Wage Laws”), which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on “public works” and “maintenance” projects, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if the total compensation is $1,000 or more, CONSULTANT agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws. The applicable prevailing wage rate determinations can be found at http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/DPreWae.eDetermination.htm CONSULTANT shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at the Consultant’s principal place of business and at the Project site.

CONSULTANT shall defend, indemnify and hold the City, it’s elected officials, officers, employees and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws.

19. Non-Waiver of Terms, Rights and Remedies . Waiver by either party of any one or more of the conditions of performance under this Agreement shall not be a waiver of any other condition of performance under this Agreement. In no event shall the making by City of any payment to Consultant constitute or be construed as a waiver by City of any breach of covenant, or any default which may then exist on the part of Consultant, and the making of any such payment by City shall in no way impair or prejudice any right or remedy available to City with regard to such breach or default.

20. Attorney’s Fees . In the event that either party to this Agreement shall commence any legal action or proceeding to enforce or interpret the provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding shall be entitled to recover its costs of suit, including reasonable attorney’s fees and costs of experts.

21. Exhibits; Precedence . All documents referenced as exhibits in this Agreement are hereby incorporated in this Agreement. In the event of any material discrepancy between the express provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of any document incorporated herein by reference, the provisions of this Agreement shall prevail.

Page 94 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 15 Last Revised: 11/12/2020

22. Applicable Law and Venue . The validity, interpretation, and performance of this Agreement shall be controlled by and construed under the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action relating to this Agreement shall be in the San Bernardino County Superior Court.

23. Construction. In the event of any asserted ambiguity in, or dispute regarding the interpretation of any matter herein, the interpretation of this Agreement shall not be resolved by any rules of interpretation providing for interpretation against the party who causes the uncertainty to exist or against the party who drafted the Agreement or who drafted that portion of the Agreement.

24. Entire Agreement. This Agreement consists of this document, and any other documents, attachments and/or exhibits referenced herein and attached hereto, each of which is incorporated herein by such reference, and the same represents the entire and integrated agreement between Consultant and City. This Agreement supersedes all prior oral or written negotiations, representations or agreements. This Agreement may not be amended, nor any provision or breach hereof waived, except in a writing signed by the parties which expressly refers to this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, through their respective authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

Consultant Name: Willdan Engineering

By: ______________________________
Name Date

______________________________
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga

By:________________________________
Name Date

_________________________________
Title

By: ______________________________
Name Date

______________________________
Title

City of Rancho Cucamonga

By:________________________________
Name Date

_________________________________
Title
(two signatures required if corporation)

Page 95 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 16 Last Revised: 11/12/2020

Approval ____ Buyer II, Purchasing
____ Alternate, Risk Management Coordinator

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Willdan Engineering will provide consulting services to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, including, but not limited to, the following tasks:
• Provide consultant input and direction on the operation and maintenance of the electric system infrastructure, including engineering design, improvements construction, and utility system extensions.
• Consultant will review plans, procures, and oversee the management of power resource requirements, including the scheduling of power resource needs. • The consultant will assist with the development and management of service contracts and ensure that the California Independent System Operator requirements are fulfilled.
• Consult with city staff to review the analysis of revenue performance and cash flow, as well as the management of long-term debt obligations. • Consultant, in cooperation with city staff, will prepare and, where appropriate, present fiscal plans and document controls for operating expenditures, assuring the proper accounting of utility fund assets and financial reporting. • The consultant will review electrical utility rate structure in relation to electrical usage, and will make recommendations regarding rate structure, along with reviewing corresponding revenues and expenditures.
• The consultant will assist with the selection, training and evaluation of city staff and independent contractors.
• The consultant will collaborate with city staff to develop and implement utility division business and work plans to meet City goals and objectives. • In collaboration with city staff, consultant will review and approve construction and maintenance plans, contracts, and work orders.
• Additionally, the consultant will manage the customer service, credit, billing, and collections processes, the administration of related databases as well as developing and establishing requirements for meter reading services, and the creation and implementation of energy resource efficiency programs.

Page 96 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 17 Last Revised: 11/12/2020
• Other duties as needed.

EXHIBIT B

SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE

Page 97 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 18 Last Revised: 11/12/2020

ADDENDUM NO.
to
Professional Services Agreement

Whereas;

and the City of Rancho Cucamonga (hereinafter the “City”) intend to enter into a Professional Services Agreement (hereinafter “Agreement”), and

Whereas;

has identified the following exceptions to the Agreement;

Now therefore:

and the City desire to incorporate the above exceptions to the attached Professional Services Agreement.

Please indicate your agreement by way of signature to this Addendum No. and the attached Professional Services Agreement. Please return two (2) original signed copies to the City no later than . The Cit y will process for signature and provide with one (1) fully executed copy of the Professional Services Agreement and Addendum No. .

Consultant Name: Willdan Engineering

By: ______________________________
Name Date

______________________________
Title
City of Rancho Cucamonga

By:________________________________
Name Date

_________________________________
Title

By: ______________________________
Name Date

______________________________
Title

City of Rancho Cucamonga

By:________________________________
Name Date

_________________________________
Title

Page 98 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 19 Last Revised: 11/12/2020
(two signatures required if corporation)

Page 99 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 20 Last Revised: 11/12/2020

Page 100 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 21 Last Revised: 11/12/2020

Page 101 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 22 Last Revised: 11/12/2020

Attachment A – Sample Waiver of Subrogation
(Sample Only – Not all forms will look identical to this Sample)

Page 102 ends

PSA with Professional Liability Insurance (Non-Design) Page 23 Last Revised: 11/12/2020

Attachment B – Sample Additional Insured for On-going Projects

Page 103 ends

DATE:May 21, 2025
TO:Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM:John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer Jasmine Lopez, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration to Accept Public Improvements located on the North Side of Napa Street and 650 Feet East of Etiwanda Avenue per Improvement Agreement, Related to SUBTPM20251, as Complete, File a Notice of Completion, and Authorize the Release of Bonds. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council:

1. Approve and accept the public improvements and their design, required for the Parcel Map 20251 (Planning Case No. SUBTPM20251) and authorize the City Engineer to file the appropriate Notice of Completion;

2. Release the Faithful Performance Bond for the associated public improvements;

3. Release the Labor and Material Bond after City Council approval; and

4. Waive the maintenance bond requirement.

BACKGROUND:

Tentative Parcel Map 20251 was approved by the Planning Commission on December 8, 2021, for the consolidation of two (2) existing parcels and subdivision into two (2) new parcels, Parcel 1 and Parcel 2, located on the north side of Napa Street and 650 feet east of Etiwanda Avenue.

Parcel 1 has an approximate area of 26.73 acres with street frontage along Napa Street and Parcel 2 proposed an approximate area of 8.67 acres with street frontages along Napa Street and the new Via Maris Place. An improvement agreement and securities were approved by the City Council on February 16, 2023, to ensure construction of the required public improvements.

ANALYSIS:

All public improvements required of this development have been completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Prior to construction of the public improvements, the developer, Napa SCC A, LLC, submitted the following securities to ensure satisfactory completion of the improvements:

Faithful Performance Bond $ 1,741,765 Bond #LICX1216555 Labor and Material Bond $ 1,741,765 Bond #LICX1216555
City staff conducted a final inspection of the public improvements and confirmed all work was completed to City standards. Typically, a separate maintenance bond in the amount of 10% of

Page 104 ends

Page 2 ends

2 8
2 0
the Faithful Performance Bond would be submitted to the City once work is completed, however in this case the developer did not provide a maintenance bond to the City; therefore, the Faithful Performance Bond was retained for the satisfactory period (one (1) year from the final inspection).

City staff has confirmed the improvements have remained in good workmanship and free of defects, City staff recommends the maintenance bond requirement be waived.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high- quality improvements that promote a world class community.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Vicinity Map

Page 105 ends

ATTACHMENT 1
Case No. SUBTT20251
Vicinity Map

NOT TO SCALE
City Boundary
Project Site
Legend

Page 106 ends

1 DATE: May 21, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jennifer Nakamura, CNU-A, Planning Director Tabe van der Zwaag, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Consideration of a Request for a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) to Permit Alcoholic Beverage Sales for Off-Site Consumption (Type-21 Off-Sale General) for an Approved
Supermarket Located in the Corridor 1 (CO1) Zone at 9040 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0208-101-20. The Project Qualifies as a Class 1 Exemption Under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301 – Existing Facilities (PCN DRC2025-00088). (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-019) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve the determination of Public Convenience or Necessity DRC2025-00088 for an approved Vallarta Supermarket located at 9040 Foothill Boulevard through the adoption of the attached Resolution of Approval and direct staff to for a copy to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC).

BACKGROUND:

On May 5, 2021, the Planning Department adopted a policy outlining the review process for PCN requests in census tracts with an over-concentration of off-sale alcohol licenses. Under this policy, staff will generally not recommend approval unless specific criteria are met. Exceptions may be considered if a business demonstrates compliance with one or more of the following:

1. Adjacent census tracts are not over-concentrated;

2. The census tract has no higher rate of DUI or criminal activity than the city average over the past three years;

3. There are no sensitive receptors (e.g., schools, parks, churches, or daycares) within two blocks;

4. The business does not operate 24 hours a day;

5. The business incorporates crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) measures approved by the Police and Planning Departments;

6. The business either (a) offers a unique product selection not generally available in the city

Page 107 ends

Page 2 ends

2 8
1 7
(e.g., a specialty imports store or combination winery/distillery), or (b) is a grocery store over 20,000 square feet in size, with alcohol sales comprising no more than 10% of display floor area and not located within ½ mile of another grocery store within City limits.

On October 24, 2024, Planning Department staff approved the repurposing of a vacant 60,309- square-foot tenant space within the Orchard Plaza commercial center for use as a Vallarta Supermarket, a supermarket chain that specializes in traditional Latino foods, including specialties found throughout Mexico and Central America. Attachment 2 includes a site plan for the center and a floor plan for the tenant space.

Figure 1 - Approved Front Elevation
Subsequently, on April 15, 2025, Vallarta Enterprises Inc. submitted a request for a PCN determination in connection with an application for a Type-21 Off-Sale ABC license. This license would permit the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits at the approved supermarket. The application was submitted to the Planning Department for review under file number DRC2025- 00088. Development Code Section 17.32.020 (Allowed Use Descriptions) outlines that “…supermarkets may include up to ten percent of floor area of alcohol sales”. The proposed display area for alcoholic beverages is approximately 3.7 percent of the total floor area. To be clear, the City Council is only being asked to review the request for the PCN.

ANALYSIS:

The subject business, Vallarta Supermarket, is to be located within Census Tract 20.16.

According to the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC), this tract is currently authorized for a maximum of two off-sale alcohol licenses based on population. Two such licenses presently exist: one at a CVS Pharmacy (8956 Foothill Blvd.) and another at NGM Liquor (9255 Baseline Rd.). If approved, Vallarta Supermarket would hold the third off-sale license in this tract.

Section 23958 of the California Business and Professions Code grants ABC the authority to regulate license distribution and requires a local jurisdiction to make a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity when the statutory license threshold is exceeded. The state does not define "Public Convenience or Necessity," instead allowing local agencies, such as the Rancho Cucamonga City Council, discretion to make determinations based on community-specific conditions and needs.

Vallarta Supermarket has submitted a letter dated April 10, 2025, requesting approval of the PCN

Page 108 ends

Page 3 ends

2 8
1 7
determination. In their letter, the applicant states that the proposed alcohol sales are intended to enhance the overall shopping experience by offering customers the convenience of purchasing alcoholic beverages alongside groceries. They emphasize that alcohol sales will be a small portion of their business and that the store will operate responsibly within regular hours (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.). Vallarta also affirms its commitment to operating in a conscientious manner that supports public health, safety, and welfare, while providing a welcoming and beneficial retail environment for residents, workers, and visitors.

Facts to Support a Public Convenience or Necessity Determination: Within the context of the policy provisions listed above, the following are facts to support the requested Public Convenience or Necessity.

Fact #1: A supermarket with the general sale of alcoholic beverages is a common and acceptable business practice. The applicant has indicated that alcoholic beverage sales will constitute only a small portion (approximately 3.7 percent of the overall floor area) of the store’s offerings and are intended to enhance customer convenience as part of the overall shopping experience.

Fact #2: The site is located at 9040 Foothill Boulevard, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Vineyard Avenue and Lion Street. Foothill Boulevard is designated as a boulevard, and the site is well-suited for this type of business. Most recent data provided by the Police Department suggests that there is no higher DUI or criminal activity rate within the census tract than the city average. Further, the business is a grocery store which is over 20,000 square feet and which comprises the alcohol sales area of less than 10% of the floor area of the business (3.7%).

Fact #3: The Census Tract in which the site is located (20.16) currently contains two (2) off- sale ABC licenses. This includes a CVS Pharmacy located at 8956 Foothill Blvd. and a liquor store located at 9255 Baseline Rd. While surrounding census tracts are overconcentrated, the proposed application involves a business which offers a unique product selection which is not generally available in the city (i.e. specialty imports).

Fact #4: The business is located within a retail shopping center, which does not contain any sensitive users, such as daycare facilities, schools, and/or churches.

Fact #5: Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient opportunities with the addition of a new supermarket that sells beer, wine, and distilled spirits to the current selection of off-sale retail locations. The applicant has committed to responsible operation and expressed sensitivity to any potential community impacts, highlighting its intent to serve local residents, workers, and visitors in a safe and conscientious manner.

Based on the above findings and analysis, staff concludes that the issuance of a Type-21 Off- Sale ABC license to Vallarta Supermarkets at 9040 Foothill Boulevard will not adversely impact the surrounding area and qualifies for an exception under the City’s Public Convenience or Necessity policy. The applicant has demonstrated a commitment to responsible operations, limited alcohol display area, and sensitivity to the community context. The proposed use meets the City’s criteria for grocery stores within over-concentrated census tracts and will enhance public convenience by offering residents and visitors expanded access to alcoholic beverages as part of a full-service shopping experience.

Environmental Assessment: The Planning Department has determined that the proposed project

Page 109 ends

Page 4 ends

2 8
1 7
is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1 – Existing Facilities) of the State CEQA Guidelines. The project involves the issuance of a PCN determination for a supermarket located in an existing commercial building. No substantial evidence exists to suggest the project will result in a significant environmental impact. The City Council has independently reviewed and concurs with the Planning Department's exemption determination.

FISCAL IMPACT:

The approval of the Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) determination for Vallarta Supermarket is expected to have a positive fiscal impact on the City of Rancho Cucamonga. The opening of a full-service grocery store in a previously vacant 60,309-square-foot commercial space will generate increased sales tax revenue through general grocery sales and limited alcohol sales. Although alcohol sales will represent only approximately 3.7 percent of the store’s floor area, these sales are typically associated with higher per-unit value items and will contribute proportionately to overall taxable sales. Additionally, activation of a long-vacant anchor space at Orchard Plaza will likely improve customer traffic to the center, supporting economic vitality and potentially benefiting surrounding small businesses within the shopping center. The store’s operation will also create new employment opportunities for residents, contributing to both direct economic benefits and secondary local spending.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / GOAL(S) ADDRESSED:

The proposed determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) for Vallarta Supermarket directly supports the City Council core value of creating equitable opportunity to prosper. The introduction of Vallarta Supermarket enhances access to culturally relevant groceries and specialty products for a diverse local population, including many who may currently lack nearby options for such goods. The project also brings jobs, economic activity, and retail reinvestment to a previously underutilized commercial space. By expanding opportunity and access equitably, this project helps ensure that all Rancho Cucamonga residents can participate in and benefit from the city’s continued growth and prosperity.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 - Project Location
Attachment 2 - Project Site Plan and Floor Plan
Attachment 3 - Census Tract 20.16 Boundaries
Attachment 4 - Applicant Letter Requesting PCN Dated April 10, 2025 Attachment 5 - PCN Determination Policy
Attachment 6 - DRC2025-00088 Resolution No. 2025-019 of Approval with Conditions of Approval

Page 110 ends

Attachment 1

Page 111 ends

SITE PLAN

VALLARTA

SUPERMARKET
9080-103 60,309 SF
Attachment 2

Page 112 ends

HAND-OFF

CHECKSTANDS




3'-4" 3'-4" 3'-4" 3'-4"3'-4"


3'-4"
4' S.S.W.T.

RICE
WARMER
H.S.
6' SUSHI 14' OF STEAM CASES 16' FRIJADO
REG

LA COCINA
COOLER
±235 S.F.
4' DR
8'-2"
20'-4"17'-10"
11'-6"
4'-9"
8'-0"

TRASH / CONDIMENTS

PRESSURE
FRYERS6 O.B. W/
CONV. OVEN 3 - 18" POT RANGES

RETHERMALIZER

STEAMER
18" POT RANGE
TILT

BRAISING PAN
4' GRIDDLE
FRYER
3' GRIDDLE
6' TABLE W/ U/C REF
2' LANDING
TABLE
4' SALAD
PREP

HAND-OFF
72' REF PRODUCE CASE
4'-3"
3'-8"
3'-8"
TIME
CLOCK

MANAGER
DESK
AUTO

LABELER
LG. MEAT

GRINDER
SAW

MEAT PREP
1,111 S.F.

SAW

GRACELLI
GRACELLI 8' S.S.W.T.
4'-10"
7'-4"4'-6"
18'-2"
8' S.S.W.T.

CREMERIA SERVICE
8' S.S.W.T.8' S.S.W.T.

TORTILLAS DISPLAY
6' CHIPS TABLE

TORTILLAS
1,115 S.F.

CHIP FRYER SCTF-101
42" 1 COMP

PREP SINK
45" HI. LOW WALL W/
GLASS ABOVE TO 60" A.F.F.

H.S
3'-2"
42" DR
6' REF MASA CASE
28'-0"11'-3" 6'-0"
H.S.

PUMP
3 NIXTAMAL

COOKING BINS
80 QT.

MIXER M-802
MASA MIXER (200 LBS.)CORN WASHER

ABOVE CORN

GRINDER

SEAFOOD SERVICE
3'-8"
4'-9"

DAIRY / DELI
COOLER
1,056 S.F.
14'-10"
11'-6"
6' DR
72' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
4'X2' END

DISPLAY
4'X4' END

DISPLAY
4'X2' END

DISPLAY
80' REF. DELI
8' REF MEAT CASE
8'X2' RUBS DISPLAY
7'-6" 6'-9"
1'-4"
9'-5"
8'-0"
7'-0"8'-0"
3'-2"
48' MEAT SERVICE
3'-2"
8' SERVICE MEAT8' SERVICE MEAT 8' SERVICE MEAT 8' SERVICE MEAT 8' SERVICE MEAT 8' SERVICE MEAT 22' SEAFOOD SERVICE
8' F/S SEAFOOD CASE
SCALE
8' F/S SEAFOOD CASE6' F/S SEAFOOD CASE
SCALE8' CREMERIA8' CREMERIA
24' CREMERIA SERVICE
8' CREMERIA

HAND-OFF

CORN TORTILLA
6' DR

RESTROOM
D.F.
(8) DIGITAL MENUS, 2 ROWS OF 4 TVS,

POWER & DATA
4'-9" FRUTERIA

CHIP DISPLAY
(2) DIGITAL MENU,

POWER & DATA
42" 1 COMP

PREP SINK
7'-6"
2 DOOR

REF CASE
32' REF SALAD CASE
12' REF PRODUCE CASE
12' REF PRODUCE CASE
4' S.S.W.T
H.S.
8' S.S.W.T
6' S.S.W.T
32'-4"
16'-4"
20'-10"
6' DR 6' DR
6' F/S CEVICHE

ICE PAN
8' S.S.W.T.8' S.S.W.T.
12' REF PRODUCE CASE

SCALE SCALE SCALE
H.S.
94" 3 COMP. SINK 87" 2 COMP PREP SINK8' S.S.W.T.
66'-4"
30" DEEP SHELVING
W/ 30" ANTHONY DOORS
66' REAR LOAD DAIRY
94" 3 COMP. SINK

DISHWASHER
6' DR
2 ICE MACHINES
O.H. WASHABLE DROP CEILING
72' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.

H.S42" 1 COMP

PREP SINK

GRINDER
42" 1 COMP

PREP SINK
6' S.S.W.T. 94" 3 COMP. SINK 6' S.S.W.T.

TRASH

CREMERIA
COOLER
±153 S.F.

MEAT
COOLER
±582 S.F.
8'-4 1/2"
5' DR
BALER
8' S.S.W.T.87" 2 COMP PREP SINK

SCULLERY
±177 S.F.

WAREHOUSE
42" DR
4' GRIDDLE
4' TABLE W/

CHEF BASE
28'-3"
20'-11"
53'-4"
8'-0" 7'-8"10'-6"
12'-0"
12' REF PRODUCE CASE12' REF PRODUCE CASE12' REF PRODUCE CASE12' REF PRODUCE CASE 75' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
12' REF DELI CASE12' REF DELI CASE12' REF DELI CASE12' REF DELI CASE12' REF DELI CASE

REG REG
3' DR
6' S.S.W.T. 8' S.S.W.T.
4' DR

LA COCINA

FREEZER
±206 S.F.
4' S.S.W.T.
5'-8"
18'-10"27'-7"
8'-0"
6'-10" 11'-1"
5 DOOR FROZEN5 DOOR FROZEN5 DOOR FROZEN5 DOOR FROZEN5 DOOR FROZEN 12'-4"11'-1"

ELECTRICAL ROOM
±121 S.F.
3'-11"

EXTERIOR

SEATING AREA
589 S.F.

TRASH
ZUMEX
94" 3 COMP. SINK
87" 2 COMP PREP SINK

PRODUCE PREP
260 S.F.

RESTROOM

SEATING AREA
4'-2"
69'-2"
27'-7"

ENTRANCE
NEW 14' DOOR PACKAGE

ENTRANCE
NEW 12' DOOR PACKAGE 6' RECEIVING DESK
SPICES
9'-2"
14'-2"
7'-10"
13'-4"
PALLET
DROP
PALLET
DROP
PALLET
DROP
PALLET
DROP
14'-9"

EMERGENCY

SHUT-OFF
10'-4"
8'-2"
56' PREPACK MEAT
12' REF MEAT CASE12' REF MEAT CASE12' REF MEAT CASE12' REF MEAT CASE 10'-10"

FLOOR FINISH TRANSITION
42" DR
6'-10"
10'-2"
13'-11"BANANA DISPLAY
19' LOW SHELVING TBD
3'-0"
16'-11"
8'-6"
11'-2"
FRI_JADO
TDR 8

AUTO CLEAN
FRI_JADO
TDR 8

AUTO CLEAN

CHICHARON CUTTING
3'-4"
4'X4' END

DISPLAY
4'X2' END

DISPLAY
7'-0" 7'-0"
4'X4' END

DISPLAY
4'X2' END

DISPLAY
7'-0"
72' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
72 GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
11'-6"
6'-8"
11'-0"
68 FROZEN DOORS
10'-11"
7'-0"
8'-0"8'-0"8'-0" 7'-5" 7'-0" 8'-0"7'-5"7'-7"14'-7"
6'-10"
7'-8"
6'-0"
8'-8"
18'-1"
6' REF DELI CASE
6' REF CASE
6' EGGS
6' REF DELI CASE 3'
16'-10"
12'-4"

GUACAMOLE
18'-1"
7'-0"
5'-7"

CART CORAL
8'-7"
4'-11"
3'-2"

STEAMER
5' REFG.

WORKTOP
6' S.S.W.T.
124" 3 COMP. SINK
H.S.
10'-6"
5'-7"
18'-1"
20'-11"
17'-7"

PALLET RACKING
14'-6"
16'-2"
TRASH
85 GAL.

DECARBONATOR
7'-6"4'-7"
7'-6"7'-6"
14'-7"
H.S.
12' REF PRODUCE CASE
8' REF DELI CASE
5' DR

CART CORAL

HIGH TOP TABLE

HIGH TOP TABLE
72' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
72' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
72' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
72' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
72' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
15'-11"

SERVER ROOM
105 S.F.
10'-0"

SD OFFICE
188 S.F.
42" DR
5'-6"
H.S.
4' S.S.W.T

PRODUCE COOLER
673 S.F.

WOMEN'S

RESTROOM
28'-4"
17'-9" 16'-0"
5'-3"
11'-10"
14'-3"

3'-4"SECURITY GATE

ACCOUNTING
ROOM
169 S.F.

SAFE
10'-7"
3'-6"
FLORAL
12' LOW REF FLORAL DISPLAY
6' HIGH REF FLORAL

DISPLAY
6' ARRANGEMENTS4'-0"

HELLIUM
CUTTER
8'-4"1'-10"

STEPPED FLORAL

DISPLAYS
24'-0"
42" 1 COMP

PREP SINK
H.S.
84" 3 COMP. SINK6'-6"
3'-11"

PROOFER DOUBLE RACK
OVEN

BOLILLERA
14' F/S CAKE CASE24' S/S LOW CAKE CASE
5'-5"

BAKERY PREP
±1,147 S.F.
6' S.S.W.T.

DISPATCH TABLE

DOUBLE RACK
OVEN
3'-0"
4'-0" 8' WOODTOP
TABLE
10'-6"
6' S.S.W.T.

BOLIADORA
7'-0"
80/40
MIXER
WATER
METER
HOSE
BIB
20 QT. MIXER
A-200
8' S.S.W.T.

DECORATOR TABLE 124" 3 COMP. SINK
SPIRAL
MIXER
18'-5"
5'-0"ISLA
11'-4"
5'-4"
10'-0" AGUAS FRESCASORDER

COUNTER
(2) 4' PREP TABLESNEEZE GUARD
DUMP
SINK
3' PICK UP/

CONDIMENTS JUICE STATION

CHAMPURRADOS/ HOT

BEVERAGE
6' TABLE W/ U/C REF
REG
H.S.
(3)DIGITAL MENUS
SCALE
11'-9"10'-7"
REG
H.S.

MEN'S

RESTROOMSCRUBBER

MOP SINK

JANITOR & SUPPLY
ROOM
111 S.F.

BREAK ROOM
406 S.F.

COFFEE
MAKER
MICRO. UPPER CABINETS
REFG.

MICRO.
3' ZUMEX
15'-7"
H.S.
3'-2"
19' PAN DULCE
19'-11"
BAKERY
COOLER
±200 S.F.

BAKERY

FREEZER
±189 S.F.
16' ALCANCIAS (84"H, 24"B, 24"S) TYP.
5 DOOR FROZEN
3'
5 DOOR FROZEN5 DOOR FROZEN5 DOOR FROZEN5 DOOR FROZEN5 DOOR FROZEN5 DOOR FROZEN 3'

E-COMMERCE
ROOM
159 S.F.
9'-11"
20'-1"
9'-11"
19'-5"
8' S.S.W.T.

STORE FREEZER
±433 S.F.
11'-11"
15'-3"
72' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
75' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.

NEW EMERGENCY

EGRESS DOORS

REMOVE EXISTING DOOR

SCAN OFFICE /
DEPT. HEAD
169 S.F.
5'-4" 7'-3"
14'-7"
11'-4"18'-11"
11'-3"
75' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
3'-11"
9'-2"
M/W
4' SALAD

PREP FRYER
4' S.S.W.T.

BLAST

CHILLER
4' S.S.W.T.

GRAB & GO PREP
3'-11"
FLORAL
COOLER
±57 S.F. 3' DR

COINSTAR
ADA

COUNTER
ATM
8' GUACAMOLE
6' SALSA
4'-1"
4' DR4' DR

DIGITAL MENU
39'-6 SPICES (84"H, 14"B, + SLAT WALL)
5' DR
22'-5"
4'X4' END

DISPLAY
4'X2' END

DISPLAY
72' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
72' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
5' SLIDER
3'-10"4' S.S.W.T.
2 DOOR FROZEN
2 DOOR FROZEN
17'-6"
14'-1"
5'-7"
5'-0"
42" 1 COMP

PREP SINK
H.S.

H.S.

SLICER
3'-8"
3'-2"
3' DR
SLICER
4'-0"
3' DR
2 DOOR FROZEN
2 DOOR FROZEN
2 DR COOLER
6' GRAB & GOORDER COUNTER
REGREG
8'X4' END

DISPLAY
4'-9"
36" HI. LOW WALL
42" H LOW WALL
52" HI. LOW WALL
(N)ELECTRICAL ROOM
±143 S.F.
3'-8" 4'-0"
4'-0"

SEATING COUNTER
70" HI. LOW WALL
48" H LOW WALL
7'-4" H WALL
11'-5" H WALL TO SOFFIT
11'-5" SOFFIT WALL
45" H LOW WALL
9'-6" WALL
14'-9" SOFFIT
WALL
48" H LOW WALL
52" H LOW WALL
12'-10" H WALL TO SOFFIT
52" H LOW WALL
10'H WALL
17'-6" SOFFIT
WALL
8'-10 H LOW WALL
48" HI. LOW WALL
14'-9" SOFFIT
WALL

STEPPED

FLORAL DISPLAY
42" HI. LOW WALL W/
GLASS ABOVE TO 60" A.F.F.
8'-10" SOFIT WALL
11'-5" SOFFIT WALL
17'-6" SOFFIT WALL
17'-6" SOFFIT WALL3'-8"
LOW

COUNTER
4'-5"12'-3"
16'-8"
3'-5"
11'-5" H WALL

TO SOFFIT
7'-4" H WALL
45" LOW WALL
34" SOFFIT WALL

SNEEZE GUARD
48" HI. LOW WALL 48" H LOW WALL
CL CL
12' REF. GRAB & GO
12' REF. GRAB & GO
5'-6" REF. GRAB & GO
5'-6" REF. GRAB & GO
01 02
03 04
05 06
07 48" HI. LOW WALL

SELF CHECK
OUT
13'-2"
24"X33" ATTENDANT

STATION
4'-6"
4'-6"
48" HI. LOW WALL
4' REFG.

PREP-TOP
2' S.S.W.T.
13'-1"
24' GROCERY (60"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
16'-1"
42" DR
8' S.S.W.T.12'-11"
8' REF PRODUCE CASE
42" 1 COMP

PREP SINK
H.S.
28'-5"

CASH & CARD CASH & CARDCASH & CARDCASH & CARD
8' DUAL TEMP

VALUE MEAT
8' DUAL TEMP

VALUE MEAT
7' DUAL TEMP

VALUE MEAT
6'-0"
4'X2' BULK
END
4'X2'

HOUSEWARE
END
6'-0"
16' BULK CHILES (48"H, 20"B) TYP.

CARD ONLYCARD ONLY CARD ONLY CARD ONLY
17'-8"
6' REF SALSA CASE
6'X2' END

DISPLAY
M/W
STEP

DISPLAY
LOTTO
42" DR
12' REF BEVERAGE
36' BEVERAGE
20' LOW WINE (60"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
20' LOW WINE (60"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
7'-7" 7'-9"
5'-3"
6' DR
66'-4"
30" DEEP SHELVING
W/ 30" ANTHONY DOORS
67' REAR LOAD BEER/WINE
68'-8"

REAR LOAD

BEER COOLER
874 S.F.
5' DR
6' S.S.W.T.6' S.S.W.T.

FRYER
4' S.S.W.T.

WINE & SPIRITS LOCKUP
242 S.F.
6' TAMALES CART

CHICKEN WARMER

FIXTURE
8'-0" 9'-4" 5'-0"10'-0"
8'-11"
18'-5"
42" DR
4' S.S.W.T
4' S.S.W.T

MOP SINK
56" TAJIN
11'-1"
8' DUAL TEMP

VALUE SEAFOOD
8' DUAL TEMP

VALUE SEAFOOD
7' DUAL TEMP

VALUE SEAFOOD
9'-0"
22'-0" 12'-6"
8'-2" 8'-2"
10'-0" 17'-3"
8'-4" 7'-9" 7'-3"
22'-5"
LP
91 S.F.

HR TRAINING
±201 S.F.

HR OFFICE
±174 S.F.
5' DR
MEAT

FREEZER
±146 S.F.

NEW EMERGENCY

EGRESS DOORS
49' LIQUOR
48" HI. LOW WALL
8' BOLILLO

DISPLAY TABLE
6' REF BERRY S/ CONTAINED
6' REF BERRY S/ CONTAINED
6' REF BERRY S/ CONTAINED
6' REF BERRY S/ CONTAINED

DISPLAY
TABLE

DISPLAY
TABLE
8'-9"
6'-7"
8'-8"
9'-9"
9'-5" DISPLAY
TABLE

DISPLAY
TABLE

DISPLAY
TABLE
3'-4" 7'-11"

CHILLED WINE
12' REF BEVERAGE
72' GROCERY (84"H, 20"B, 20"S) TYP.
12' REF BEVERAGE
16' BULK CHILES (48"H, 20"B) TYP.
16' BULK CHILES (48"H, 20"B) TYP.
16' HOUSEWARES (48"H, 20"B) TYP.
16' HOUSEWARES (48"H, 20"B) TYP.
16' HOUSEWARES (48"H, 20"B) TYP.
4'X2'

HOUSEWARE
END
4'X2' BULK
END
4'X2' BULK
END
4'X2' BULK
END
FRYER
10' CHEESE ISLAND

DISPLAY
12'-0" 10'-0"
9'-3"
7'-8"

FLOOR FINISH TRANSITION FLOOR FINISH TRANSITION
4'-0"
19' DULCERIA (84"H, 24"B, 24"S) TYP.
5'-4" 5'-4"

THAW & SELL

DISPLAY TABLE
5'-6" 5'-4"
3'-6"

THAW & SELL

DISPLAY TABLE
7'-10"5'-6"

POLYTOP
16' S/S CUT FRUIT

POLYTOP
87" HI. WALL
4' PREP LOW

POLYTOP

DIGITAL SCREEN
REF.

WEDGE
3'-8"
FRYER
FRYER
4'-5"
5' S.S.W.T.

WATER HEATERS &

FUTURE ICE MACHINE

COMPRESSOR

POWER DROPS
WITHIN 6' OF ENDS, TYP.
6'-0"
6'X4' END

DISPLAY
5'-0"5'-1"
5' SLIDER
14'-11"
9'-10"
8'-2"

DISPLAY
TABLE

DISPLAY
TABLE5'-0" 8'-5"
8'-6"
H.S.

BAGGED ICE
5' REFG. WORKTOP84" 3 COMP. SINK
42" 1 COMP
PREP SINK6' S.S.W.T.

H.S.
4' S.S.W.T.

METRO
FOOD
WARMER
METRO
FOOD
WARMER
H.S. 3' LOW

DOORDASH
4' REFG.

WORKTOP
11'-5" H WALL

TO SOFFIT
16' DULCERIA (84"H, 24"B, 24"S) TYP.
120" SOFFIT WALL
96" SOFFIT WALL
2'-6"

BAGGED ICE
2'-6" 3'-6"
17'-2"
2'-6"
A
B.1
C.2
D.9
G
B.8
C.9
E
B
F.2
C.3
AA
H
1 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1621.2 5
1/8" = 1'-0"

FIXTURE
PLAN
F-1

SQUARE FOOTAGE
GROUND

MEZZANINE
TOTAL
±59,304 S.F.

BAKERY

BEER / WINE
REF. BEER (REAR LOAD)
REF. WINE (REAR LOAD)

S/S LOW CAKE CASE

F/S CAKE CASE

PAN DULCE
CATEGORY LINEAR FT.

GROCERY (endcaps not included) | HIGH / LOW / TOTAL

PRODUCE WETRACKS (HIGH REF)
1,011
CATEGORY LINEAR FT.

DAIRY (REAR LOAD)
GROCERY FREEZER DOORS (endcaps included)

GROCERY

PRODUCE

MEAT SERVICE

MEAT BUNKER / DUAL TEMP
MEAT

DELI CASES
DAIRY
FLORAL
HIGH REF FLORAL REFG. SALAD
NOTE:

THE BACKGROUND IS NOT AS-BUILT AND

MAY REQUIRE REVISIONS TO BE IN

ALIGNMENT ONCE A FULL AND COMPLETE

SURVEY HAS BEEN CONDUCTED

BOLLILO FIXTURE

LOW REF FLORAL
CATEGORY LINEAR FT.

F/S SEAFOOD

CEVICHE

SEAFOOD

SEAFOOD DUAL TEMP

CREMERIA

CREMERIA CASES

TORTILLERIA

TORTILLAS

REF MASA CASE

CHIPS DISPLAY

CHEESE ISLAND DISPLAY

GRAB & GO
COCINA

HENNY PENNY

STEAM CASES

SUSHI CASE

TAMALES CART ISLA

JUICE STATION

AGUAS FRESCAS

CHAMPURRADOS

LOW CANDY APPLE REF
CATEGORY LINEAR FT.

LOW GRAB & GO REF BEVERAGE REF

DULCERIA

MEAT BUNKER / DUAL TEMP

MEAT PRE-PACK

CUT FRUIT
EGGS

SPIRITS
CATEGORY LINEAR FT.

SPICES
PACKAGED SPICES 39'-6"
80'
68 DRS.
66' (24 DRS.)
6'
72'
32'
16'
56'
(2) 8'
(2)
7'
22'
6' 24'
4'
48'
10'
18'-11"
6'
11'-4"
10'-0"
YES
11'-9" (2 P.O.S.)
10'-6"
16'
14'
6'
35'
6'
36'
6'
12'
55' (20 DRS.)
10' (4 DOORS)
36'
24'
14'
19'
(1) 8'
40'
N/A
±59,304 S.F.

CATEGORY LINEAR FT.

Sheet Number
Sheet Title
ISSUE
CDL English Design, Inc. 2022
SUBMITTALS:

Date

DESIGN DOCUMENTS - FOR REFERENCE ONLY
DATE

ALL DRAWINGS AND WRITTEN MATERIAL APPEARING ON THIS DOCUMENT CONSTITUTE THE ORIGINAL AND UNPUBLISHED WORK OF DL ENGLISH DESIGN, AND MAY NOT BE DUPLICATED, USED OR DISCLOSED WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF DL ENGLISH DESIGN. COPYRIGHT DL ENGLISH DESIGN STUDIO. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.” LOW WINE 64'
BAKERY TABLES (9) 4'
LOW SPICE FIXTURE N.A.

YES

SEAFOOD DUAL TEMP

GUACAMOLE

GUACAMOLE PREP TABLEYES
REF. GUACAMOLE CASE8'

CEVICHE MEDICINE
MEDICINE (INLINE) 16'

HOUSEWARES
LOW HISPANIC HOUSEWARES FIXTURE 48'

ALCANCIAS
TABLES 2 REF. SALSA CASE 6'
1REVISION 1
06/21/24
2REVISION 2 06/28/24
3REVISION 3 07/15/24
16'
4REVISION 4 07/23/24
5REVISION 5 07/31/24
6REV 6 (Shell) 08/05/24
7REV 7 (Shell) 09/04/24
8REV 8 (Fixture) 09/10/24
9REV 9 (Shell/Fixt) 09/24/24
10REV 10 (Misc. Revs)10/09/24
1111/07/24 ( ALT. OPTIONS)
REV 11
(2) 5'
THAW & SELL (DISPLAY TABLE)(2) TABLE

CANDY INLINE
(2) 8'
(2)
7'
12REVISION 01/09/25
13REVISION 01/15/25
14REVISION 02/05/25
2,198.18 sf
AREA OF ALCOHOL SALES: 2,195 SF (3.7% OF 59,304 SF TOTAL)

Page 113 ends

Census Tract 20.16 Boundaries
Attachment 3

Page 114 ends

Corporate Office • 28480 Avenue Stanford • Santa Clarita, CA 91355 • Company Main (818) 898-0088 April 10, 2025
Re: Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc.

Vallarta Supermarkets #66
9040 Foothill Blvd
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
To Whom It May Concern:

Please consider this letter our request for a determination of Public Convenience and/or Necessity (PCN) for a Type 21 Liquor License which is required by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) pursuant to Business and Professions Code Section 23958.4.

Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc. will prove to be extremely desirable to the public convenience and welfare by providing area residents, visitors and workers with comfortable shopping in a warm friendly atmosphere. We will operate in a conscientious and thoughtful way, always with sensitivity to any possible detriment to those residents that might be affected.

The applicant requests to sell alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption and in conjunction will not jeopardize, endanger or otherwise constitute a menace to public health, safety or general welfare. Vallarta Supermarkets store operating hours are 7:00am – 10:00pm daily. We are fully aware of the unique responsibilities of operating a store associated with alcoholic beverage sales. Although alcohol sales are only a small portion of our business, as part of the shopping experience we believe that our customers desire the convenience of being able to purchase alcoholic beverages. This convenience is imperative to our ability to serve and attract our customers.

We respectfully request that the Alcoholic Beverage Control find that Public Convenience and Necessity would be served by the issuance of this license. Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any further questions or require any additional information.

Thank you for your assistance.

Sincerely,
Trey Lindle
Vallarta Supermarkets
[email protected]
(323) 443-6226
Attachment 4

Page 115 ends

Attachment 5

Page 116 ends

Page 117 ends

RESOLUTION NO. 2025-019

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO

CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DETERMINATION OF
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY (DRC2025 -00088) FOR

ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE SALES FOR OFF -SITE CONSUMPTION
(TYPE-21 OFF-SALE GENERAL) FOR AN APPROVED SUPERMARKET
LOCATED IN THE CORRIDOR 1 (CO1) ZONE AT 9040 FOOTHILL
BOULEVARD; AND MAKING FINDINGS IN SUPPORT THEREOF– APN:
0208-101-20

A. Recitals.

WHEREAS Vallarta Food Enterprises, Inc. filed an application for a Public Convenience or Necessity determination DRC2025 -00088 as described in the title of this Resolution for a Type -21 (Off -Sale General) license from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). Hereinafter in this Resolution, the subject Public Convenience or Necessity request is referred to as "the application."
WHEREAS, Section 23958 of the Business and Professional Code requires the City of Rancho Cucamonga to make a determination on whether the issuance of the said license will service the public convenience or necessity.

WHEREAS, On the 21st day of May 2025, the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga reviewed said application prior to the adoption of this Resolution.

WHEREAS, all legal prerequisites prior to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.

B. Resolution.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby found, determined, and resolved by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga as follows:

1. This Council hereby specifically finds that all of the facts set forth in the Recitals, Part A, of this Resolution are true and correct.

2. Based upon substantial evidence presented to this Council during the above - referenced public hearing on May 21, 2025, including written and oral staff reports, this Council hereby specifically finds as follows:

a. The site is located in Census Tract 20.16 at 9040 Foothill Boulevard, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Vineyard Avenue and Lion Street; and

b. The Orchard Plaza shopping center is located within Census Tract 20.16.

Attachment 6

Page 118 ends

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 25-XXX
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2025-00088 – VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC.

May 21, 2025

Page 2 ends

c. Section 23958 of the California Business and Professions Code grants ABC the authority to regulate license distribution and requires a local jurisdiction to make a finding of Public Convenience or Necessity when the statutory license threshold is exceeded. The state does not define "Public Convenience or Necessity," instead allowing local agencies such as the Rancho Cucamonga City Council discretion to make determinations based on community -specific conditions and needs; and
d. Vallarta Supermarkets has submitted a letter dated April 10, 2025, requesting approval of the PCN determination. In their letter, the applicant states that the proposed alcohol sales are intended to enhance the overall shopping experience by offering custo mers the convenience of purchasing alcoholic beverages alongside groceries. They emphasize that alcohol sales will be a small portion of their business and that the store will operate responsibly within regular hours (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.). Vallarta also affirms its commitment to operating in a conscientious manner that supports public health, safety, and welfare, while providing a welcoming and beneficial retail environment for local residents, visitors, and workers; and

3. The following are facts to support the requested Public Convenience or Necessity. a. Fact #1: A supermarket with the general sale of alcoholic beverages is a common and acceptable business practice. The applicant has indicated that alcoholic beverage sales will constitute only a small portion (approximately 3.7 percent of the overall floor area) of the store’s offerings and are intended to enhance customer convenience as part of the overall shopping experience.
b. Fact #2: The site is located at 9040 Foothill Boulevard, on the north side of Foothill Boulevard, between Vineyard Avenue and Lion Street. Foothill Boulevard is designated as a boulevard, and the site is well-suited for this type of business. Most recent data provided by the Police Department suggests that there is no higher DUI or criminal activity rate within the census tract than the City average. Further, the business is a grocery store which is over 20,000 square feet an which comprises the alcohol sal es area of less than 1 0% of the floor area of the business (3.7%).
c. Fact #3: The Census Tract in which the site is located (20.16) currently contains two (2) off-sale ABC licenses. This includes a CVS Pharmacy located at 8956 Foothill Blvd. and a liquor store located at 9255 Baseline Rd. While surrounding census tracts are overconcentrated, the proposed application involves a business which offers a unique product selection which is not generally available in the City (i.e. specialty imports). d. Fact #4: The business is located within a retail shopping center, which does not contain any sensitive users, such as daycare facilities, schools, and/or churches. e. Fact #5: Rancho Cucamonga residents would be afforded more convenient opportunities with the addition of a new supermarket that sells beer, wine, and distilled spirits to the current selection of off -sale retail locations. The applicant has committed to responsible operation and expressed sensitivity to any potential community impacts, highlighting its intent to serve local residents, workers, and visitors in a safe and conscientious manner.

4. Based upon the findings set forth in paragraphs 1 and 2 above, and with the Condition of approval specified in Section 6, this City Council concludes that the issuance of an off-sale

Page 119 ends

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 25-XXX
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY DRC2025-00088 – VALLARTA FOOD ENTERPRISES, INC.

May 21, 2025

Page 3 ends

general license for Vallarta Supermarket will not have a negative impact on the surrounding uses.

5. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this City Council hereby determines that with the imposition of the condition specified in Section 6, the issuance of an off -sale liquor license for Vallarta Supermarket will service the P ublic Convenience or Necessity.

6. Based upon the findings and conclusions set forth in Paragraphs 1, 2, and 3 above, this City Council hereby approves the request for a Public Convenience or Necessity determination subject to each and every condition set forth in the attached Conditions of Approval.

The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution.

PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 21ST day of May 2025.

Page 120 ends

_____________________________
L. Dennis Michael, Mayor
ATTEST:

__________________________________
Kim Sevy, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO ) ss

CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA )
I, Kim Sevy, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Rancho Cucamonga, California, at a Regular Meeting of said City Council held on the 21st day of May 2025.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

Executed this 21st day of May 2025, at Rancho Cucamonga, California. __________________________________
Kim Sevy, City Clerk

Page 121 ends

Conditions of Approval

Community Development Department
Project #: DRC2025-00088

Project Name: Vallarta Supermarkets
Location: 9040 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020810120-0000

Project Type: Public Convenience & Necessity

ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Planning Department
Please be advised of the following Special Conditions

1. Approval Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) to permit alcoholic beverage sales for off-site consumption (Type-21 Off-Sale General) for an approved supermarket located in the Corridor 1 (CO1) Zone at 9040 Foothill Boulevard - APN: 0208-101-20.

Standard Conditions of Approval

2. The applicant shall indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless, the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials and instrumentalities thereof (collectively “Indemnitees”), from any and all claims, demands, lawsuits, writs of mandamus, and other actions and proceedings (whether legal, equitable, declaratory, administrative or adjudicatory in nature), and alternative dispute resolutions procedures (including, but not limited to, arbitrations, mediations, and other such procedures) (collectively “Actions”), brought against the City, and/or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof, that challenge, attack, or seek to modify, set aside, void, or annul, the action of, or any permit or approval issued by, the City and /or any of its officials, officers, employees, agents, departments, agencies, and instrumentalities thereof (including actions approved by the voters of the City), for or concerning the project, whether such actions are brought under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), State Planning and Zoning Law, the Subdivisions Map Act, Code of Civil Procedure Section 1085 or 1094.5, or any other state, federal, or local statute, law, ordinance, rule, regulation, or any decision of a competent jurisdiction. This indemnification provision expressly includes losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to this approval, the Planning Director’s actions, the Planning Commission’s actions, and/or the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit , action, or other legal proceeding. It is expressly agreed that the City shall have the right to approve , which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and that the applicant shall reimburse City for any costs and expenses directly and necessarily incurred by the City in the course of the defense. City shall promptly notify the applicant of any Action brought and City shall cooperate with applicant in the defense of the Action. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due.

Printed: 5/12/2025
www.CityofRC.us

Page 122 ends

Project #: DRC2025-00088
Project Name: Vallarta Supermarkets

Location: 9040 FOOTHILL BLVD - 020810120-0000
Project Type: Public Convenience & Necessity

ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS APPLY TO YOUR PROJECT:

Planning Department
Standard Conditions of Approval

3. The applicant shall be required to pay California Department of Fish and Wildlife Notice of Exemption fee in the amount of $50.00. All checks are to be made payable to the Clerk of the Board Supervisors and submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary prior to public hearing or within 5 days of the date of project approval.

4. Any approval shall expire if Building Permits are not issued or approved use has not commenced within 2 years from the date of approval or a time extension has been granted.

Standard Conditions of Approval

1. Surveillance cameras shall be installed a combination of interior and exterior views of the business, with the intent to capture digital images of subjects entering, exiting, cash registers and vehicle and pedestrian traffic approaching the business. Prior to issuance of certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall contact the Rancho Cucamonga Police Department for an inspection of the security cameras.

2. Video recordings of surveillance cameras shall be nothing less than NTSC (National Television System Committee, the NTSC is the analog video color format used to broadcast television signals) standards, with a minimum of 5MP resolution. A minimum of 30 days surveillance video shall be kept. The applicant(s) or on-site manager(s) shall maintain the recording system and cameras in working condition.

3. The applicant or on-site manager(s), shall post a prominent, permanent sign stating, “NO LOITERING IS ALLOWED ON OR IN FRONT OF THESE PREMISES” in a place that is clearly visible to patrons of the premises. The sign shall fit the requirements as set forth by the City of Rancho Cucamonga.

4. The business shall have an alarm system active and monitored by an alarm company who is able to contact law enforcement if a problem occurs within the business.

5. Applicant or on-site manager, shall actively monitor the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons on any property adjacent to the licensee’s premises .

6. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee(s) shall be removed or painted over within 72 hours of being applied.

7. The parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of persons on or about the parking lot. Additionally, the position of such lighting shall not disturb the normal privacy and use of any neighboring residences. The exterior lighting shall be maintained in working condition by the applicant or on-site property manager.

Printed: 5/12/2025
www.CityofRC.us

Page 2 of 2 ends

Page 123 ends

DATE: May 21, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Jason C. Welday, Director of Engineering Services/City Engineer James Lo, Assistant Engineer
SUBJECT: Consideration of Replacement Subdivision Improvement Agreements and Acceptance of Replacement Bonds for Final Maps of Tracts 16072- 1, 16072-2, 16072-3, and 16072. (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council:

1. Approve the Improvement Agreements for related public improvements and authorize the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign said Agreements;

2. Accept securities in the form of bonds for completion of public improvements related to Tract 16072-1, 16072-2, 16072-3, and 16072;

3. Release the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material Bond for the associated public improvements; and

4. Authorize staff to accept rider bonds for adjusted securities.

BACKGROUND:

Tentative Tract Map SUBTT16072 was approved by Council on June 16, 2004 (Council Resolution 04-206). The subdivision is generally located north of Wilson Avenue between East Avenue and Etiwanda Avenue, and it would provide for the development of 358 single-family lots that range from roughly 9,000 square feet to over ½ acre in size. After its approval, Richland Communities, LLC. (Richland), then the owners of the land, accepted the requirements for development and processed the subdivision as a phased map. All maps have been recorded and Richland placed the appropriate financial securities for public improvements.

Since the maps recordation, Richland sold the properties to Toll Etiwanda, LLC (Toll) and Lennar Homes of California, LLC (Lennar) for their final development and improvement, retaining partial responsibility for the construction required improvements. The City currently holds financial securities totaling $12,942,300 for the construction of public improvements for SUBTTM16072.

Due to a change in ownership from a single developer to three developers, it is necessary to replace the existing bonds to reflect the new ownership structure and updated unit costs.

ANALYSIS:

In order to release the Richland bonds associated with improvements now under different ownership, replacement bonds have been issued to cover the original bonded amounts for each tract.

Page 124 ends

Page 2 ends

2 8
3 5
The bonding amount for Tract No. 16071-1, CFD improvements, and the Interceptor Channel, previously consolidated under one bond, has been redistributed among the new owners based on current quantities. This redistribution has resulted in an increased total bond amount of $17,905,180. The following summarizes the project responsibilities and bonding information:

Toll holds ownership of Tract 16072-1 and Tract 16072-3. They are responsible for constructing the improvements for onsite street and storm drain. They are replacing the bonds and agreements currently recorded with the City associated with this work. The bond replacement reassigns the principal from Richland to Toll. The approved in-tract street plans are permitted, and related construction work is expected to start or continue this calendar year.

Lennar holds ownership of Tract 16072-2 and Tract 16072. They are responsible for constructing the improvements for onsite street and storm drain as well as offsite street, storm drain and landscaping. They are replacing the bonds and agreements currently recorded with the City associated with this work. The bond replacement reassigns the principal from Richland to Lennar.

The approved in-tract street plans are permitted, and related construction work is expected to start or continue this calendar year.

Additionally, Lennar is responsible for constructing the master (CFD) improvements included in the subdivision and development requirements. They have replaced the bonds and agreements currently recorded with the City, with the principal reassigned from Richland to Lennar. The approved off-site street plans are permitted, and construction work is ongoing. CFD landscape plans are approved, and related construction work is expected to start or continue this calendar year.

Richland will continue the work related to the required interceptor channel. They have revised their agreement and placed a bond for the reduced scope. The plans are approved and permitted for construction, and construction activities are ongoing and expected to be completed within the calendar year.

Below is a breakdown of the bonding information for each owner and their respective improvements. This table outlines the current bond amounts and the new bond amounts following the reassignment of responsibilities and adjustments for material cost increases.

NEW OWNER IMPROVEMENTS CURRENT BOND NEW BOND
RICHLAND INTERCEPTOR CHANNEL $2,199,820
LENNAR CFD (OFF-SITE) $3,294,365
TOLL TRACT NO. 16072-1
Bond No. 7901023847
$5,350,100
$4,818,795
LENNAR TRACT NO. 16072-2 Bond No. 7901023849
$2,922,300
$2,922,300
TOLL TRACT NO. 16072-3 Bond No. 7901023854
$2,991,500
$2,991,500
LENNAR TRACT NO. 16072 Bond No. 7901023855
$1,678,400
$1,678,400
Copies of new Improvement Agreements and Replacement Bonds are on file with the City Clerk’s Office.

Page 125 ends

Page 3 ends

2 8
3 5
Under the subdivision improvement agreement, the City has the authority to request bond adjustments to ensure financial security accurately reflects improvement costs. As part of the bond swap review, staff reviewed the existing bond amounts and is requiring an increase to align with current market conditions.

However, due to time sensitivities related to ownership changes and agreements, staff proposes releasing Richland from bonding responsibilities for properties that have changed hands and accepting a bond swap to designate the new ownerships as principals for the bonds. However, to maintain adequate financial security, Lennar and Toll Brothers will submit rider bonds within one month, adjusting and increasing securities based on current City unit pricing for right-of-way work.

Staff is requesting that City Council authorize the acceptance of bond riders by staff, contingent upon final review and approval by the City Engineer, eliminating the need for further Council action.

FISCAL IMPACT:

None.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This item addresses the City Council’s vision for the City by ensuring the maintenance of high- quality improvements that promote a world class community.

ATTACHMENTS:

None.

Page 126 ends

DATE: May 21, 2025
TO: Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: John R. Gillison, City Manager
INITIATED BY: Elisa Cox, Assistant City Manager
Matt Marquez, Economic Development Director
Flavio Nuñez, Management Analyst II
SUBJECT: Consideration of Resolution No. 2025-018 Declaring Pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that certain Real Property Owned by the City located at 8282, 8328, and 8378 Rochester Avenue is Surplus Land and Not Necessary for City’s Use, Finding that Such Declaration is Exempt from Environmental Review Under the California Environmental Quality Act, and Taking Related Actions. (RESOLUTION NO. 2025-018) (CITY)
RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached resolution declaring pursuant to Government Code Section 54221 that certain real property owned by the City is surplus land and not necessary for the City’s use, finding that such declaration is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act, and taking related actions.

BACKGROUND:

The City of Rancho Cucamonga is the owner in fee simple of certain real property (“Property”) at the locations shown and described below:

Page 127 ends

Page 2 ends

2 8
3 8
APN: 0229-012-081 – this parcel measures approximately 1.88 acres and is currently used for visitor parking
APN: 0229-012-082 – this parcel measures approximately 1.47 acres and is currently used as a combination of visitor parking and green space

Page 128 ends

Page 3 ends

2 8
3 8
APN: 0229-012-083 – this parcel measures approximately 1.88 acres and is currently used for visitor parking
The Property is situated within an area of the city known as the Epicenter and is currently used to support activities at LoanMart Field, the City’s Adult Sports Complex, SoFive Soccer, and other uses in the area. The property highlighted above is no longer necessary for City use and can be declared surplus land pursuant to the Surplus Land Act.

Under the Surplus Land Act, Government Code Sections 54220-54234 (“Act”), surplus land is land owned in fee simple by the City for which the City Council takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring the land is surplus and not necessary for the City’s use. The Act provides that land shall be declared either surplus land or exempt surplus land before the City may take action to dispose of it.

Under the Act, land is necessary for the City’s use if the land is being used or is planned to be used pursuant to a written plan adopted by the City Council, for City work or operations. The Act specifies that the City’s use does not include commercial or industrial uses, and land that is disposed of for the purpose of investment or generation of revenue is not necessary for the City’s use.

ANALYSIS:

The Property is currently being used as visitor vehicle parking and green space. Staff has evaluated the property and determined that necessary parking for uses in the area can effectively continue to be provided without needing to utilize the Property described in this report and the Property is not suitable for other City uses. Staff is therefore recommending that the City Council formally declare that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the City’s use.

The Act requires that before the City disposes of the Property or engages in negotiations to dispose of the Property, the City must send a written notice of availability (“NOA”) of the Property, which includes the location and a description of the Property, to certain designated entities.

Negotiations do not include commissioning an appraisal, due diligence, discussions with brokers or agents who are not representing a potential buyer, studies to determine value or the best use of the land, the issuance of a request for qualifications, development of marketing materials, or discussions exclusively among local agency employees and officials.

If the City does not agree to price and terms with a designated entity or if no designated entity responds to the NOA, the City can proceed to sell or lease the Property to any entity. However, if ten or more residential units are developed on the Property, not less than 15% of the total residential units developed on the Property must be made available at an affordable housing cost or affordable rent to low-income households pursuant to a covenant recorded against the land.

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA):

The City Council hereby finds that it can be seen with certainty that the declaration of surplus land has no likelihood of causing a significant negative effect on the environment. This finding is premised on the fact that no project or physical changes are proposed for the Property and this declaration is merely an administrative procedure before the City may dispose of the Property.

Based upon these findings, the City Council determines that this Resolution is exempt from the application of the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.

Page 129 ends

Page 4 ends

2 8
3 8
FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this item.

COUNCIL MISSION / VISION / VALUE(S) ADDRESSED:

This action is in keeping with the Council’s vision to create an equitable, sustainable, and vibrant City, by setting the stage for appropriate, high-quality reuse of these properties in the future.

ATTACHMENTS:

Attachment 1 – Resolution & Draft Notice of Availability

Page 130 ends

-1-
11231-0001\3105069v1.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-018

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

RANCHO CUCAMONGA , CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54221

THAT CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE CITY
AT 8282, 8328, AND 8378 ROCHESTER AVENUE IS
SURPLUS LAND AND NOT NECESSARY FOR THE CITY’S

USE, FINDING THAT SUCH DECLARATION IS EXEMPT

FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER THE

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND

TAKING RELATED ACTIONS

WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Cucamonga (“City) is the owner in fee simple of that certain real property located at 8282, 8328, and 8378 Rochester Avenue (APNS:
0229-012-081, 0229-012-082, and 0229 -012-083) and further described in Exhibit “C,” attached hereto and made a part hereof ; and

WHEREAS, in October of 2024 the City of Rancho Cucamonga recorded a Lot Line Adjustment with the San Bernardino Assessor -Recorder-County Clerk (Document# 2024-0257932) that altered the lot lines of multiple parcels , as described in Exhibits “A” and “B”, attached hereto. This Lot Line Adjustment resulted in the creation of the parcels identified as APNS: 0229 -012-081, 0229 -012-082, and 0229 -012-083 (“Property”), as described in Exhibit “C,” attached hereto; and

WHEREAS, under the Surplus Land Act, Government Code Sections 54220 - 54234 (“Act”), surplus land is land owned in fee simple by the City for which the City Council takes formal action in a regular public meeting declaring the land is surplus and not necessary for the City’s use. The land must be declared either surplus land or exempt surplus land; and

WHEREAS, under the Act, land is necessary for the City’s use if the land is being used, or is planned to be used pursuant to a written plan adopted by the City Council, for City work or operations; and

WHEREAS, the Property is currently home to surface parkin g and green s pace which support activities at and around LoanMart Field; and

WHEREAS, City staff has evaluated the Property for its potential to be used for City work and operations and has determined that the Property is not suitable for the City’s use within the meaning of the Act and is therefore not necessary for the City’s use; and

WHEREAS, the City Council desires to declare that the Property is surplus land and not necessary for the City’s use; and

Page 131 ends

Rancho Cucamonga City CouncilMay 21, 2025

Rancho Cucamonga City Council
May 21, 2025