Subject:Rancho Mirage Housing Element Update - Virtual Community Workshop No>ce - Join us! Date:Wednesday, January 6, 2021 at 9:40:43 AM Pacific Standard Time From:Kimberly Cuza
BCC:[email protected] , [email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, [email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, [email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, [email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, [email protected] ,
[email protected] ,
[email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, [email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, [email protected] ,
jor>[email protected] [email protected]>, execu>[email protected] [email protected]>, [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] , tmize@na>onalcore.org
onalcore.org>, [email protected] ,
[email protected] , Kelly Clark , Nicole
Criste , Marcus Aleman ,
Kris>e Ramos, CMC [email protected]>
AFachments:image001.png
9-353
COMMUNITY WORKSHOP NOTICE
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE HOUSING ELEMENT COMMUNITY WORKSHOP Wednesday, January 13, 2021 - 1 :00 p.m.
A community workshop for the City's Housing Element Update (2021-2029 planning period) will be held Wednesday, January 13, 2021, at 1:00 p.m. via Zoom. At this workshop, the City will
discuss background information regarding its upcoming Housing Element Update including new State Housing Element law, the 2021-2029 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) allocation for the City and take public comments on the Update from those attending . All members of the public are encouraged to attend.
The Housing Element is a series of goals , policies, and implementation measures for the preservation, improvement, and development of housing, which would apply throughout the City .
To participate in the workshop via Zoom, please use the link and meeting information below. https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88415352196?pwd=OHVtb2poeWNQWFFFSW1 acjRUaFJOZz09 Passcode:225211
Webinar ID: 884 1535 2196
Please RSVP by email to [email protected], by 10:00 a.m. on the day of the meeting (requests received after 10:00 a.m . on meeting day may not be processed). Written comments may be submitted to the City Clerk via email to [email protected], or mailed to 69-825 Highway 111 , Rancho Mirage, CA 92270.
Specific questions regarding the workshop or Housing Element may be directed to Marcus Aleman, Housing Manager, at (760) 324-4511 or [email protected].
The City of Rancho Mirage promotes fair housing and makes all programs available to low-income families and individuals, regardless of race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, marital status , political affiliation, sex , age , sexual orientation or other arbitrary factor.
Housing Element Community Workshop RSVP
Name Email Contact Information RSVP
Jennifer Loretta [email protected]
Development Coordinator
72680 Dinah Shore Dr., Suite 6
Palm Desert, CA 92211
760.969.6917 Ext 202
Yes
Joy Silver Reg Director [email protected] SoCal CHOC Yes William L [email protected] Yes
Mary Ann Ybarra
Director of Multifamily
Coachella Valley Housing
Coalition
Office: (760) 347-3157 x 502
Cell phone: (760) 393-6968
Yes
Tony Mize [email protected] National Core Yes
William E. (Bill) Cutler
Statewide Services Inc.
424-541-6086
Yes
TAYLOR LIBOLT VARNER
Lift to Rise
o 760-636-0420
c 909-336-8790
73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite
100 Palm Desert, CA 92260
Yes
Alma Perez [email protected] Coachella Valley Housing
Coalition Yes
9-355
First Name Last Name Email
Bitian Chen [email protected]
Nicole Criste [email protected]
Marcus Aleman [email protected]
Majna Dukic [email protected]
Jennifer Loretta [email protected]
Jason Jaurigue [email protected]
Tony Mize [email protected]
William Cutler [email protected]
Alma Figueroa [email protected]
Anna Tellez [email protected]
Jessica Leal [email protected]
Joy Silver [email protected]
Gretchen Gutierrez [email protected]
Alice Salinas [email protected]
David [email protected]
Ian Gabriel [email protected]
Ted Weill [email protected]
James Brownyard [email protected]
Alma Perez [email protected]
Deanna Mendoza [email protected]
Mary Ann Ybarra [email protected]
January 13, 2021 Housing Element Update Attendee List
9-356
Housing Element Update
Community Workshop
January 13, 20219-357w ~ c:::L. -E 0 I u z:: <[ DL. \.l_ 0 ~ -u
Background
•The City’s vision and guiding principles are contained in its General Plan.
•The Housing Element is one part of the General Plan
that the City must update every 8 years.
•The purpose of the Housing Element is to assure that the City facilitates the development of housing for all its residents.9-358
About the City
•Population 18,075 residents
•6,315 with a disability
•Age Median –66.3 years
•7.5% aged 0-19
•22.7% aged 20-54
•69.6% aged 55+
•Income Median –$71,227
•294 households below the poverty line9-359t t t t
About the City
•Households 9,406 total
•3,155 lower income households (80% or less of County median income)
•Overpaying 2,530 households
•1,575 owner-occupied
•955 renter-occupied
•Overcrowded 141 Units
•53 owner-occupied
•88 renter-occupied9-360t t t
Housing Needs
INCOME CATEGORY NUMBER OF UNITS
Extremely low income 214
Very low income 215
Low income 317
Moderate income 327
Above moderate income 668
TOTAL 1,741
Note that the extremely low and very low income categories are 50% each of the 429 units assigned for the very low category Source:SCAG
Regional Housing Needs Allocation
2022 to 2029
9-361
Housing Sites
•Distributed throughout the City
•Section 19 Specific Plan
•Monterey Marketplace
•Highway 111
•Potential for 2,764 Very Low,
Low and Moderate income
units9-362
Next Steps
•Complete document for review by the State’s
Department of Housing & Community
Development
•Planning Commission and City Council hearings
late summer 20219-363
Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 16:49:50 Pacific Daylight Time
Subject:Rancho Mirage Housing Element Update - Public Review Date:Tuesday, September 7, 2021 at 4:48:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time From:Kimberly Cuza
BCC:[email protected] , [email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, [email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, [email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, [email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, [email protected] ,
[email protected] ,
[email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, [email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, [email protected] ,
[email protected] , [email protected]
, execuWvedirector@h^cv.org ,
info@h^cv.org , [email protected] , [email protected] , Marcus Aleman , KrisWe Ramos, CMC
, Nicole Criste
AHachments:image001.jpg
As a participant in our community workshop for the City of Rancho Mirage’s Housing Element Update, we wanted to let you know the draft Housing Element document is available on the city’s website for public review, from September 7 – 21, 2021.
We invite you to provide comments on the Element through this portal: https://cityofrmdev.wpengine.com/our-city/city-departments/planning/housing-element- 9-364
----------
update/
9-365
-----
9-366
Housing Element Update I City of Re X +
0 8 https://cityofrmdev.wpengine.com/our-city/city-departments/planning/housing-element-update/ Search ...
[~II ■ RANCHO
MIRAGE
Home .... Residents "' .... Business "' llii.. Visitors .... Our City "' i.r.. How Do I? Home / Our City / City Departments / Planning / Housing Element Update The Rancho Mirage Housing Element is intended to provide both citizens and public officials with a comprehensive understanding of the housing needs in Rancho Mirage. It sets forth policies and programs that will enable the City to reach its defined housing goals and attempt to assure that every Rancho Mirage resident secures a safe and decent place to live in a satisfactory environment.
The Housing Element promotes a coordination of housing policies and programs at local, state, and federal levels.
The 2021 -2029 Housing Element Update pdf is available for review at the link below.
Housing Element Update PDF
If you would like to provide comments or feedback, please fill out the boxes below and submit or feel free to email Marcus Aleman, Housing Manager at marcusa@ranchomirageca .gov.
Name*
Email*
Comments/Feedback
Submit
Depa rtment/D ivi s ion
Directory
Executive Team
Department Directory
Administrative Services
Building & Safety
City Attorney
City Clerk
City Manager
Code Compliance/Animal
Services
Development Services
Economic Development
Finance
Fire
Housing
Human Resources
Information Services
Library & Observatory
Marketing
Planning
Police
Public Works
80% '{j
Housing Element
City of Rancho Mirage
Housing Element Update
Appendix C
Highway 111 Inventory Sites
9-367
Highway 111 Specific Plan
Land Inventory Sites
Site E, Planning Area 1
APN Acreage
674490032 1.216066103
674490031 1.320636207
674490027 1.093948035
674490028 1.148224339
674490034 3.254306679
674490039 1.198238667
674490037 1.332841544
674490033 1.185431353
674490038 1.92941182
674490026 1.035096601
674490036 0.93804492
Site F, Planning Area 2
APN Acreage
689070001 0.212166165
689030002 0.171514986
689070002 0.15068799
689030006 23.8106543
689030004 2.57862011
689030003 0.608322859
689030005 8.330890927
689030017 3.251653705
Site G, Planning Area 4 MU
APN Acreage
689210004 0.553553622
689210005 0.546684698
689210027 0.890079802
689210028 1.179555571
689210029 1.997725701
Site G, Planning Area 4 RH SP
APN Acreage
689202016 0.162406284
689202006 0.280908284
689202029 0.354541071
689202008 0.199419488
689202015 0.198847158
689202012 0.217312252
689201008 0.294874844
689202011 0.217046881
689201004 0.340574689
689202002 0.200365114
689202034 0.363462412
689202013 0.201846559
689202030 0.27495129
689202027 0.179517961
689202017 0.283142216
689202022 0.201606781
689202036 0.579308494
689202014 0.202152554
689202018 0.28893136
689202028 0.288370656
689202031 0.298093652
689202023 0.191843285
689202010 0.201610704
689202032 0.303395364
689202024 0.39390886
689202033 0.303805502
689202001 0.207740795
689202005 0.32328559
689202007 0.163064299
689202025 0.20198471
689202003 0.199488194
689202009 0.202715335
689202004 0.197701954
689202026 0.200472316 9-368
Highway 111 Specific Plan
Land Inventory Sites
Site H Planning Area 7
APN Acreage
684130027 575081.6606
684130015 41118.40204
684130017 20346.59781
684190004 215596.6103
Site I Planning Area 9
APN Acreage
684255006 0.135806733
684255003 0.154080154
684255009 0.1417576
684255005 0.130158009
684255007 0.131911561
684255008 0.290137824
684254003 0.264699217
684254006 0.133856848
684255004 0.132509015
684254007 0.066372362
684254005 0.266759893
684254008 0.070201402
684254004 0.259153576
684255011 0.167969241
684255017 1.009053777
684254013 1.389382004
684255002 0.122299122
684255010 0.144788999
9-369
Safety Element
8 Safety
Introduction
The Safety Element addresses natural and manmade
environmental hazards that might occur in Rancho Mirage and surrounding areas. It provides information, goals, policies, and programs to protect the general health, safety, and welfare of the community from seismic, geological, flood, hydrology, and hazardous and toxic materials events. The assessment of and planning for these hazards and the constraints that manage them is the primary purpose of the Safety Element. The policies and programs of this element should also be coordinated with the Public Services and Facilities Element, which includes a discussion of emergency services and facilities and the City’s Emergency Preparedness Plan.
Geotechnical Hazards
Purpose
Rancho Mirage and the SOI are located in an area subject to substantial seismic and geological hazards such as strong ground shaking, seismic-induced settlement, seismic-induced landslides, collapsible and expansive soils, ground subsidence, and wind- blown sand hazards. These seismic and geological hazards can affect the structural integrity of buildings and utilities and, in turn, cause severe property damage and potential loss of life.
The purpose of the Geotechnical Hazards section, in the following pages, is to provide information, goals, policies, and programs to protect the general health, safety, and welfare of the residents of Rancho Mirage relative to seismic and other geotechnical hazards, It also serves to educate the community about seismic and related geologic hazards.
Background
Major Fault Hazards in the Rancho Mirage Area
Rancho Mirage is located in an area with numerous active faults.
At least two active faults lie close to Rancho Mirage’s northern edge and SOI, but are north of I-10 and outside of the City’s jurisdictional boundaries. These are the Banning fault and the Garnet Hill fault. Both fault zones are capable of causing damage to Rancho Mirage. Other faults in the region, such as the San Andreas, San Jacinto, and San Gorgonio Pass faults, also have the potential to produce strong seismic shaking in Rancho Mirage.
Ground shaking during an earthquake is the most significant seismic hazard that will impact Rancho Mirage. Exhibit 21 shows the faults sur- rounding the city.
The most important piece of legislation related to seismic hazards is the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act, which prohibits locating structures for human occupancy across active fault lines until geotechnical investigations determine that a prospective site is safe for habitation. The Act also requires cities to disclose to the general public areas that are subject to seismic hazards, by means of maps and other appropriate materials.
An effective seismic hazard reduction program should include the identification and mapping of geologic and seismic hazards, the enforcement of building and fire codes, and the expedient retro- fitting and rehabilitation of weak structures. Programs should also be developed to help residents provide for themselves and their families in the aftermath of an earthquake.
Other Seismically Induced Hazards
In addition to direct effects such as ground rupture and ground acceleration, other seismically induced and geological hazards can injure people and damage structures. These hazards include liquefaction, dynamic settlement, landslides, and inundation.
Liquefaction
Liquefaction may occur when loose, unconsolidated, saturated, sandy soils are subjected to ground vibrations during a seismic event. This occurs in areas where the groundwater table is within 50 feet of the ground surface and when seismic events occur that generate a Modified Mercalli Intensity value of seven or greater.
9-3702017 General Plan
Fault Locations
---Known Location
- - -Approximate Location
·•·•·•·• Concea led
~ Al quist-Priolo Earthquake
L___J Fault Zone
c:J City Li mits .---· l ___ 1 Sphe re of Influence
Sources: Earth Consultants International, 2005;
Jennings, C.W , Strand, R.G., and Rogers, T.H., 1977;
Riverside County, 2016; Esri World Imagery, 2017.
santaA110 ~ ----,~-a.
\ .,.,.
\ ~
' «~
"'c-1,,
so,, ,,,,,O'r.
f-ro«•L E>os ,..Q.
,,, b,-Q. <-/t
"'"~.I
2 Significant ground shaking can suddenly increase water pressure in the pores between soil particles and cause soils to lose cohesion and to “liquefy.” Effects include a loss of bearing strength, ground oscillations, and lateral spreading and slumping. This hazard is considered low in the Rancho Mirage area, principally because the approximate depth to groundwater is greater than 50 feet.
Liquefaction may occur in or adjacent to the Whitewater River if the near-surface alluvial sediments become saturated as a result of precipitation or the recent input of surface water from the adjacent mountains. However, water percolates rapidly through alluvial materials, so the likelihood of an earthquake occurring while these sediments are saturated in the upper 50 feet is very low. Areas of liquefaction susceptibility are shown in Exhibit 22.
Dynamic Settlement
Under some circumstances, strong ground shaking can cause densification or compaction of soils resulting in local or regional settlement of the ground surface. This can result in local differential settlement and damage to foundations and structures, as well as damage to water and sewer lines. This potential is affected by the intensity and duration of ground shaking and the relative density of the subsurface soils.
Windblown sands and other recently deposited sediments are typically loose and, therefore, potentially subject to seismically induced settlement. In the planning area, development on the valley floor or on wind or stream deposited sediment should include site-specific subsurface geotechnical investigations that address this potential seismic hazard. Proper excavation, compaction, and foundation design can address some of the seismic settlement potential. Seismically induced settlement susceptibility is shown in Exhibit 23.
Landslides
Exhibit 24 shows how seismically induced landslides and rock falls can be expected to occur in the southern portion of Rancho Mirage in and adjacent to the slopes of the Santa Rosa Mountains.
With several faults in the area, there is a high potential for seismically induced rock falls and landslides to occur in Rancho Mirage. Fractures and landslides are likely to occur in the Indio Hills area, in the ocotillo conglomerate. Intense ground shaking can be expected at the top of Edom Hill as a result of the local topographical features, thereby intensifying the seismic shaking.
Scattered rock falls could occur in the Santa Rosa Mountains, in areas where the bedrock is intensely fractured or jointed. Sections of Highway 111 adjacent to the Santa Rosa Mountains could be blocked by fallen rock debris immediately following an
earthquake, which would hinder rescue and evacuation
operations. Rock falls could also impact developments adjacent to mountain slopes, especially those at the mouth of Magnesia Springs and Bradley Canyons. Throughout Rancho Mirage,
manufactured slopes of significant height could also be susceptible to failure if not engineered to resist seismically induced failure.
Inundation
Seismic events can cause failure of water tanks, reservoirs, retention basins, recharge basins, and other water storage structures, especially in areas susceptible to ground failure. There are several storage tanks in Rancho Mirage that could be subject to damage in an earthquake. Damage to these tanks could hinder efforts to suppress fires and could greatly limit supply and availability of potable water after a major earthquake. Only limited opportunities for seismically induced inundation downgrade of stormwater retention basins currently exist in Rancho Mirage. As there are few stormwater retention basins in Rancho Mirage and its vicinity, this hazard is substantially reduced, if not eliminated. The design engineering of future major detention/retention facilities will need to focus on the seismic hazards of the area when planning for and constructing these facilities.
Geologic Hazards
The physiographic and geologic histories of the Rancho Mirage area are important in that to a great extent they control the geologic hazards, as well as the natural resources, in Rancho Mirage. These hazards include collapsible soils, ground subsidence, wind erosion, and wind-blown sand. For example, wind-blown sand erosion poses a significant hazard across the Coachella Valley due to funneling of fierce winds by the steep mountain barriers. Locations at the base of the mountains are more sheltered from this hazard, but areas in and adjacent to the mountains are more likely to be impacted by rock falls and unstable slopes. Regional tectonic subsidence along the valley floor, concurrent with uplift of the adjacent mountains, is responsible to a great extent for the rapid deposition of poorly consolidated alluvium that is susceptible to consolidation and/or collapse. On the other hand, the deep alluvium-filled basin, which is bounded by relatively impermeable rock and faults, provides a natural under- ground reservoir (aquifer) for groundwater, one of Rancho Mirage’s primary sources of domestic water. The extraction of water from these aquifers may cause the ground to settle or sink. 9-371Liquefaction Suscept i bil ity Moderate
1111 Very low
1111 None
c:::::J City Lim its
r_-_-_: Sphere of Influence
Sources : Earth Con sultants International,
2016; Riverside County, 2016; Esri World
Imagery, 2017.
@ o 0 .5
N
ci
~
"' 0
, ...
I ',
I -
I
',
',,,
ci
Q) -c ·.;;
OD
C: ·c
0 ~
...... ....... .. ..
... .. ,
-c a:-:s
E
"' <(
"' _g
', ,,.
Dinah Shore ~
ci
Q)
C.
0 I
.0
0 a,
Gera l d Ford Dr
Frank Si natra Dr
Country Cl ub Dr
•,
' ' ...
' ',
©
3 Safety Element
Collapsible Soils
The composition of soils in the area is an important factor of the geological conditions in Rancho Mirage. The potential for soils to collapse or expand can cause damage to structures. Soil collapse typically occurs in recently (Holocene) de- posited sediments laid down by wind or water. When saturated, collapsible soils undergo a rearrangement of their grains and a loss of cohesion or cementation, resulting in a substantial and rapid settlement even under relatively low loads. The alluvial and aeolian sediments in the planning area are prone to collapse, and this propensity should be evaluated on a site-specific basis as part of geotechnical studies for development. Mitigation can be accomplished through a variety of design and construction methods.
Ground Subsidence
Ground subsidence is the gradual settling or sinking of the ground surface with little or no horizontal movement. Several regions of subsidence have been documented in Riverside County – all of them in deep, alluvium-filled valleys. In most cases, subsidence was at- tributed to declining groundwater levels. Regional subsidence from groundwater withdrawal is a potential hazard that the City can proactively mitigate by supporting the proper management of the groundwater supplies, creating water conservation programs, encouraging water recycling, and educating the public. With the expected increases in population, overdraft of the aquifers underlying the Coachella Valley will be one of the most serious challenges in maintaining the region’s environmental quality.
Wind Erosion and Wind-Blown Sand
Most of Rancho Mirage is highly susceptible to wind erosion. The geomorphology of the Coachella Valley, its extreme aridity, and the marine air masses funneled from the west through the San Gorgonio Pass conspire to create strong and persistent winds in the valley. These strong winds have been blowing and
redistributing sand deposits in the area for thousands of years.
Lands disturbed by flooding, grading, or agricultural activities, therefore, are subject to significant erosive forces that suspend fine dust and transport sand over great distances.
In addition to damaging vehicles, structures, and other improvements, blowing sand collects on streets, in driveways, and in other areas where it must be removed at considerable expense.
The presence of dust particles in the air is also a source of major health problems, as atmospheric dust causes respiratory discomfort and may carry pathogens that cause eye infections and skin disorders. Dust storms reduce highway and air traffic visibility.
Exhibit 25 shows the wind erosion hazard zones occurring in Rancho Mirage and the SOI.
Mitigation measures currently used in Rancho Mirage focus on the application of the Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan. Some other physical measures used in the area include hedges, walls, and other barriers to wind. Water is typically sprayed at construction sites to reduce dust in the air by weighing down the soil.
Development projects and individual structures can be designed to protect occupants and property from the damage of blowing sand.
Vegetation covers, such as a desert hydroseed mix, can reduce wind erosion of the topsoil, but these efforts are only partially effective in mitigating the wind erosion hazard. Furthermore, grass requires intense watering to thrive, and in an area where water is such a vital commodity, the need for water preservation needs to be weighed against the need to control airborne dust.
Exhibit 23 Seismically Induced Settlement Susceptibility
9-3722017 General Plan
Richter Scale
EARTHQUAKES ARE TYPICALLY DEFINED BY THEIR MAGNITUDE AS MEASURED ON THE RICHTER SCALE. EACH WHOLE NUMBER STEP
IN MAGNITUDE ON THE SCALE REPRESENTS A TENFOLD INCREASE
IN THE AMPLITUDE OF THE WAVES ON A SEISMOGRAM AND
ABOUT A 31-FOLD INCREASE IN ENERGY RELEASED . As AN
EXAMPLE , A 7.5 MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKE IS 31 TIMES MORE
POWERFUL THAN A 6.5 MAGNITUDE QUAKE.
Mercalli Scale
THE MODIFIED MERCALLI INTENSITY SCALE IS A MORE USEFUL
MEASURE OF THE DAMAGE POTENTIAL OF EARTHQUAKES, AND
IS BASED UPON PEOPLE 1 S REACTIONS TO A QUAKE, OBSERVED DAMAGE TO STRUCTURES, AND OTHER PHYSICAL EFFECTS.
THERE ARE TWELVE LEVELS OF INTENSITY IN THIS SCALE, RANGING
FROM I (TREMOR NOT FELT) TO VI I (HEAVY DAMAGE TO
POORLY BUILT STRUCTURES) TO XII (DAMAGE IS NEAR TOTAL). 1111 Areas with a h igh suscept ibility
to se ismically induced
settlement.
~ Areas with a moderate
susceptibility to seismica l ly
i nduced settlement.
1111 Areas with a low susceptibility
to seism ically ind uced
settlement .
1111 Area s not susceptible to
seis m ically induced settlement .
c::::J City Limits ---, ~ _ •• • Sphere of Influen ce
Sources: Earth Consultants International, 2005; Riverside County, 2016; Esri World Imagery, 2017.
@ o 0 .5
N
4 9-373Hi llsi d e and m ountainou s areas -
numerou s rock falls and l andslid es
expec t ed to occur d u ring an
ea rthqua ke.
Area with a high suscepti b ility o f
being impacted by rock f alls and
seim ically induced landsliding.
Area w i th a moderate susceptibi l ity
of being impacted by rock falls and
se ismical ly induced landsliding.
1111 Area w ith a low susce ptibi lity o f
being impacted by rock f alls an d
seismica lly induced landsliding.
c::::J City Limits ---, ~ __ .• Sphe re of Influence
Sources: Earth Consultants International, 2005; RNerside County, 2016; Esri World Imagery, 2017.
@ o
N
0 .5
Miles
Exhibit 24 Seismically Induced Rock Falls and I andslide Susceptibili ty Very Seve re w ind erosion hazard -areas
exposed to erosive winds where soil s show
very distinct ev idence of wind removal
and/or accumulation formi ng dunes more
than 48 inches high .
Severe w ind erosion hazard -areas
exposed to erosive winds where the soils
show d istin ct evidence of w ind removal
and/or accumulation in hummocks 24 to
48 inches high.
Moderate w ind erosive haza rd -area s
partially protected from erosive winds
where the soils show ev idence of wind
remova l or accumul ation in h ummocks up
to 24 inches high and all areas with fine -to
med ium-gra ined so ils that are protected
from erosive winds.
1111 Sl igh t wind erosion hazard -bedrock areas
and areas where so ils are coarse-gra ined
and show no ev idence, or sligh t evide nce ,
or soil remova l or acc umu lation.
c::::J City Lim its ---, ~ ___ , Sp he r e o f Influence Sources: Earth Consultants International, 2005; Riverside County, 1016; Esri World Imagery, 2017.
@ o
N
0.5 Mil es
c
~
"' 0
1 ,,, , ..
I ',
I X:,,,
I ', ,-.. ,,
I ',
', ..
~-•·---....... ~ E
"' .
~
~
C
0 ~
Exhib it 25 Wind Erosion Hazard
5 Safety Element
Open Space for Public Health and
Safety
An important function of open space is its use as a buffer to separate people and buildings from hazards that could cause injury, damage, or death. Open space for public health and safety includes areas requiring special management or regulation because of hazardous or special conditions such as earth- quake fault zones, unstable soil or slope areas, flood plains, watersheds, areas presenting high fire risks, areas required for the protection of water quality and water reservoirs, and areas required for the protection and enhancement of air quality. Al though these lands remain open to mitigate potential hazardous situations, they have potential for other uses. Land along fault lines can be retained in its natural condition as a wildlife corridor, and flood control facilities may be usable for natural open space, wildlife habitat, and recreation.
OPEN SPACE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY GOALS, POLICIES,
AND PROGRAMS
The development review process performed by the City must assure that proposals are thoroughly evaluated with regard to seismic and geological safety, that all necessary special studies are conducted and reviewed, and that comprehensive mitigation measures are developed and implemented. Developing a
groundwater management and water conservation program and encouraging the use of recycled water will be important in mitigating ground subsidence. The City should also work with state, regional, and county agencies to establish and maintain an up-to- date database on seismic geological conditions in the region, legislation affecting the City’s regulatory responsibilities, and changing technical assessments that refine or re-characterize the seismic hazards affecting the region.
GOAL SAFE 1
A community that plans for and is protected from the effects of seismic and geological hazards.
POLICY SAFE 1.1
The City shall consult and cooperate with surrounding communities and applicable state and federal agencies to improve and update information on regional seismic and geological conditions.
PROGRAM SAFE 1.1A
Coordinate with the California Division of Mines and Geology and the United States Geological Survey to establish and maintain maps illustrating the location of seismic and geological hazard zones occurring in Rancho Mirage's boundaries and the SOI.
PROGRAM SAFE 1.1B
Coordinate with the National Earthquake Hazard Reduction Program of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to
identify earthquake risks and available mitigation techniques.
POLICY SAFE 1.2
The City shall establish ordinances and guidelines to reduce the hazards from wind-blown sand and dust.
PROGRAM SAFE 1.2A
Coordinate with the SCQAMD and other local agencies to
develop and maintain appropriate large particulate (PM10) mitigation practices.
POLICY SAFE 1.3
The City shall require the removal or rehabilitation of hazardous or substandard structures that may collapse in the event of an earthquake.
POLICY SAFE 1.4
The City shall cooperate and coordinate with public and quasi- public agencies to assure seismically strengthened or relocated facilities and other appropriate measures to safeguard water, electricity, natural gas, and other transmission and distribution systems.
PROGRAM SAFE 1.4A
Encourage and cooperate with Caltrans to stabilize susceptible slopes and strengthen bridges, elevated roadways and other structures along state highways, which may be subject to failure during major seismic events, thereby isolating portions of the community from emergency aid and assistance.
POLICY SAFE 1.5
The City shall play an active role in the development or distribution of earthquake preparedness information and materials to residents and local businesses.
PROGRAM SAFE 1.5A
Confer and cooperate with local utility companies, the CVWD, the Palm Springs Unified School District, police and fire departments, and others to coordinate public education regarding appropriate action before, during, and after earthquakes and other disasters.
PROGRAM SAFE 1.5B
Keep the City’s public awareness programs on natural disaster management and emergency preparedness up-to-date on current hazards and issues.
POLICY SAFE 1.6
New septic tank leach fields, seepage pits, drainage facilities and heavily irrigated areas shall be located away from foundations and other structural supports to minimize the creation of a localized collapse of soils and associated hazards.
POLICY SAFE 1.7
Developers of projects in areas identified as being subject to a rockfall or landslide hazard shall prepare detailed geotechnical analysis, including site response to seismic events, and require mitigation measures that reduce associated hazards to insignificant levels.
PROGRAM SAFE 1.7A
Require design of engineered slopes to resist earthquake-induced failure.
PROGRAM SAFE 1.7B
Require design of lifelines (e.g., roadways, utilities, rail- roads) that cross a fault to resist the occurrence of a fault rupture.
POLICY SAFE 1.8
The City shall encourage the incorporation of wind barriers, architectural design or features, and drought resistant ground coverage in new development site designs to mitigate the impacts from erosion and wind-blown sand.
POLICY SAFE 1.9
Where appropriate, hazard zones (earthquake fault lines, floodways and floodplains, steep or unstable slopes, etc.) shall be designated as open space, and incorporated into the General Plan land use map.
9-3742017 General Plan
6 Flooding and Hydrology Hazards
Purpose
Rancho Mirage and surrounding areas, like most of southern California, are subject to unpredictable seasonal rainfall. Most years, the scant winter rains are barely sufficient to turn the hills green for a few weeks, but every few years the region is subjected to periods of intense and sustained precipitation that result in flooding. The potential for flooding is a safety concern that the City continues to address. It is the intention of the City to plan and implement the phased development of flood control facilities, both project-specific and citywide. Provisions for open space and multiple uses, wildlife, and pedestrian and equestrian corridors in major drainages are also planned.
Background
Desert Conditions and Flood Hazards
Rancho Mirage and the Coachella Valley enjoy a subtropical desert climate. Mean annual rainfall is very low on the desert floor, ranging from four to six inches per year. On average, nearby Mount San Jacinto experiences of 25.3 inches of rainfall annually.
High intensity thunderstorms and tropical storms can occur suddenly, however, creating flood hazards. Although the ground may be generally dry at the beginning of a storm, sufficient amounts and intensities of rainfall can saturate the desert surface and substantially reduce percolation, pushing the water farther downstream. Development also in- creases runoff by creating large areas of impervious surface. Furthermore, increased runoff upstream can be a significant contributor to downstream damage.
Areas of potential flooding are generally associated with the Whitewater River and its tributaries, mountain canyons, and their alluvial fans, as well as runoff associated with the Indio Hills drainage (including Edom Hill). Exhibit 26 identifies areas subject to flooding both along the Whitewater River drain- age and along the fan area between I-10 and the Indio Hills (identified as the I- 10 Wash). The 100-year flood zone for the Whitewater River is generally confined to the channel of the river and its tributaries, although at the bottom of Magnesia
Spring Canyon, the 100-year flood limits extend to several of the residential streets in the area. The 500-year flood limits cover a large residential and commercial section of Rancho Mirage and extend across Highway 111.
Although the City’s SOI does not extend north of I-10, there is a potential for substantial flooding in the wash north of I-10. Flooding in this area is generally shallow, between one and three feet deep, but the floodwaters move at relatively high velocities with the potential to do considerable damage. According to maps issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) maps, the velocity of the floodwaters in this area varies between five and seven feet per second.
FEMA also reports that most of the streams in the Rancho Mirage area have the potential to carry large amounts of debris. This increases the volume of peak discharges, and when flows reach the valley, the debris is deposited, com- pounding the flooding problem. Debris has the potential to fill or plug structures designed to collect and convey run- off, forcing floodwaters into the adjacent areas. Rapidly moving flows heavily laden with debris are also extremely dangerous.
Increased urbanization of the northern portions of the Coachella Valley can and will result in increased amounts of runoff during large storms. Local agencies have realized that unless adequate flood control measures are implemented, this increased runoff can damage improvements and endanger life.
The CVWD is the primary agency responsible for the management of regional drainage in the vicinity of Rancho Mirage, including rivers, major streams and their tributaries, and areas of significant sheet flooding. CVWD is empowered with broad management functions, including flood control planning and construction of drainage improvements for regional flood control facilities, as well as watershed and watercourse protection related to those facilities.
A small portion of Rancho Mirage lies within the Riverside County Flood Control District boundary, which encompasses Sections 4 and 9 along the border between Rancho Mirage and Cathedral City.
Land Use Planning as a Flood Control Strategy
Proper land use planning is one of the most effective and direct methods of controlling flooding and limiting threats to lives and property. Consistent with other primary goals of the community, land use planning can call for the preservation of natural vegetation in the foothills and mountains that function as natural watersheds for local drainage and groundwater recharge and can affect the volume of stormwater and debris that reaches down- stream facilities.
Land use planning can also limit the exposure of people and improvements to storm hazards and damage. Restrictions on the type and location of structures in the vicinity of major drainages in the community can greatly reduce potential damage. Within the limits of improved and unimproved 100-year floodplains, development should be severely limited and regulated, with the prohibition of the construction of structures for human habitation. To promote sound land use and floodplain development, FEMA provides Flood Insurance Rate Maps for local and regional planners and civil engineers. These maps provide more detailed flood hazard map information, including the boundaries of the 100-year and 500-year flood zones.
The City’s Floodplain Management Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 15.28) provides flood hazard reduction measures including standards of construction, standards for utilities, subdivisions, manufactured homes and recreational vehicles. In flood zones subject to sheet flooding, development approvals should be conditioned to assure protection of improvements from flood damage. Protection measures may include raising the finished floor level above the flood depth projected for the surrounding area and providing protection against scouring. Until such time as flood protection that removes areas from severe threats of flooding is provided, development in these areas should be carefully regulated.
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) implements the federal Clean Water Act and was adopted in 1990. It requires the development, adoption, and implementation of plans and programs for stormwater management, which among other things must effectively prohibit non stormwater discharge into the storm drain and require controls to reduce the discharge of pollutants from stormwater systems to designated Waters of the United States.
Riverside County municipalities and agencies, including the City of Rancho Mirage, Riverside Flood Control and Water Conservation District, and CVWD, have joined to develop and implement the 2001-2006 Stormwater Management Plan as part of NPDES
permitting requirements. This plan was designed to manage and control stormwater runoff to the maximum extent practical.
One of the primary strategies to comply with the provisions of NPDES is the use of onsite stormwater retention or detention basins in any new developments of one acre or larger. These facilities have long been required by the City and may in some instances include artificial wetlands that use a biologically active zone to break down potential pollutants before they can contaminate surface runoff or reach the water table through percolation. These intercept structures will also be important in capturing sand and sediment before it is discharged into drainage facilities. 9-375100-year Floodplain LAND SUBJECT TO FLOODING IN A 100-YEAR FLOOD OR A
FLOOD ELEVATION THAT HAS A 1% CHANCE OF BEING EQUALED
OR EXCEEDED EACH YEAR
500-year Floodplain
LAND THAT HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BE FLOOEDED IN A STORM
WITH A 0.2% CHANCE OF OCCURRING EVERY YEAR
Benchmark Storms
BENCHMARK STORMS ARE USED BY THE ARMY CORPS OF
ENGINEERS TO CALCULATE FLOOD POTENTIAL. THEY INCLUDE THE STORM OF SEPTEMBER 24, 1939 IN THE COACHELLA VALLEY
DESERT REGION. THIS INTENSE STORM GENERATED 6.45 INCHES OF RAIN IN 6 HOURS.
TROPICAL STORM KATHLEEN GENERATED VERY HEAVY GENERAL
RAINFALL FROM SEPTEMBER 9 TO 11, 1976, GENERATED
A HIGH LEVEL OF STORM RUNOFF, WITH RANCHO MIRAGE
RECEIVING 3 INCHES AND THE SURROUNDING HILLS AND
MOUNTAINS RECEIVING AS MUCH AS 14 INCHES.
7 Safety Element
FLOODING AND HYDROLOGY HAZARDS SAFETY GOALS, POLICIES,
AND PROGRAMS
The principal and direct implementation of the goals, policies, and programs in this section will occur through the use and enforcement of FEMA’s National Flood Insurance Plan (NFIP) guidelines and mitigation measures, NPDES requirements, and the application of CVWD’s regional plans and policies. These measures and their improvements help control and confine the areawide drainage pattern to more discreet and focused routes where it can be better managed. Proper implementation may also reveal locations of new facilities that could complement land use patterns, provide cost effective flood control alternatives, and maximize opportunities for multiple uses, including enhanced groundwater recharge.
The NFIP flood plain maps and guidelines will also set critical parameters for future development along areas subject to areawide flooding. This section will also be implemented through the development guidelines and regulations of the Rancho Mirage zoning, grading, and subdivision ordinances.
GOAL SAFE 2
Protection of lives, property, and essential facilities from flooding and other hydrologic hazards in Rancho Mirage.
POLICY SAFE 2.1
The City shall ensure that updated and effective master drainage plans are implemented in a timely fashion for the near and long- term protection of the community and its residents.
PROGRAM SAFE 2.1A
Proactively participate with the CVWD and the Riverside County Flood Control District in the development and updating of Rancho Mirage Regional master drainage plans, providing land use and other relevant data and information.
POLICY SAFE 2.2
The City shall provide drainage controls and improvements that enhance local conditions and are consistent with and complement the Master Drainage Plans.
PROGRAM SAFE 2.2A
Establish and/or update local regulations and guidelines to direct the management of runoff and provide for local drainage facilities that tie into and maximize the effective use of regional drainage facilities.
PROGRAM SAFE 2.2B
Adopt or update local drainage policies and development standards that reduce the rate of runoff from developed lands, consistent with capacities of public facilities and local and regional management plans, while pro- viding opportunities for open space enhancement and multiple uses.
PROGRAM SAFE 2.2C
Confer and consult with the CVWD and Caltrans to assure adequate all weather crossings/facilities at appropriate locations along Highway 111 and I-10, especially those serving as emergency evacuation/access routes.
PROGRAM SAFE 2.2D
Ensure that emergency evacuation routes are constructed to appropriate all-weather standards.
POLICY SAFE 2.3
The City shall provide direction and guidelines for the development of onsite stormwater retention/detention facilities consistent with local and regional drainage plans and community design
standards.
9-3762017 General Plan
Above -ground wate r reservo i r;
e reservoi r number assigned by the
Coachella Va lley Wa te r Dist r ic t .
Flood Zo n e s
~ Zone A - Special Flood Hazard
Areas inundated by 100-year floo d;
no base elevations determi ned .
1111 Zone AO -Specia l Flood Hazard
Areas inundated by types of 100-
year shallow flood i ng where
depths are between 1 to 3 fee t .
1111 Zone X -Areas of 500-year flood ;
areas of 100-yea r flood with
average depth of less t ha n 1 foot
or wit h drainage area less t han 1
square mi le; and areas protected
from 100-year flood by levees .
c::J City Limits .---, , ___ 1 Sphere of Infl ue nce
Sources: Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2016;
Coachella Valley Water District, 2016; Riverside County, 2016; Esri World Imagery, 2017.
@ o 0 .5
N
"'-,
I .. ,"
_, ' I
I
Country Club Dr
8 PROGRAM SAFE 2.3A
Establish and enforce regulations and guidelines for the development and maintenance of project-specific onsite
retention/detention basins that implement the NPDES program, enhance groundwater recharge, complement regional flood control facilities, and ad- dress applicable community design policies.
POLICY SAFE 2.4
The City shall cooperate with FEMA, when necessary, to amend Flood Insurance Rate Maps for areas in the city boundaries and SOI.
POLICY SAFE 2.5
Design major drainage facilities, including debris basins and flood control washes and channels, to balance their enhancement as wildlife habitat and community open space amenities with the functional requirements of these facilities.
PROGRAM SAFE 2.5A
Work closely with the CVWD to assure that design opportunities for enhanced open space and recreation amenities, including habitat enhancement and hiking and equestrian trails, are fully explored and incorporated when designing and constructing channels, debris and detention basins, and other major drainage facilities, to the greatest extent practical.
POLICY SAFE 2.6
The City shall establish Area Drainage Plans or Benefit Assessment Districts for purposes of funding needed drainage improvements, especially where defined tributary areas of the community are concerned.
POLICY SAFE 2.7
Development proposals located in areas that are subject to flooding shall be evaluated to minimize the exposure of life and property to potential flood risks. All development proposed on lands of one acre or larger shall be designed such that all stormwater to the level of a 100-year frequency storm, worst case of the 3, 6, 12, or 24-hour duration, shall be retained onsite.
POLICY SAFE 2.8
Locate new essential public facilities outside of flood hazard zones, including hospitals and health care facilities, emergency shelters, fire stations, emergency command centers, and emergency communications facilities.
Fire Hazards
Purpose
The Fire Hazards section identifies existing fire hazards in or near Rancho Mirage and describes the regulatory environment
established to safely manage these hazards. The intention of the Fire Hazard section is to reinforce the City’s concern and planning for the protection of all Rancho Mirage residents. The section sets forth goals, policies, and programs that will help assure an effective management of fire hazards in Rancho Mirage, and guard the general health, safety, and welfare of the community from possible impacts associated with fire hazards. This section was reviewed to incorporate the advice included in the Office of Planning and Research’s most recent publication of “Fire Hazard Planning, General Plan Technical Advice Series” (May 2015).
Background
Fires can occur in urban environments as well as unpopulated areas that may contain brush or grassland. The central and northern portions of Rancho Mirage are urbanized with few remaining vacant lands. The remaining southern area of Rancho Mirage is in an undeveloped mountain and hillside reserve. These two area types include two fire hazard categories that are of interest to Rancho Mirage and its SOI: vegetation fires and urban or structural fires. With large portions of Rancho Mirage’s boundaries adjoining uninhabited mountain and hillside reserve areas that are rated as high fire threats, the potential for wildfires is high. The urban areas in Rancho Mirage also face common fire hazards.
Wildland Fire Hazards
Large areas of southern California are particularly susceptible to wildfire due to the region’s weather, topography, and native vegetation. The typically mild, wet winters characteristic of the region’s Mediterranean climate result in an annual growth of grass- es and plants that dry out during the hot summer months. This dry vegetation provides fuel for wildfires in the autumn, when the area is intermittently impacted by Santa Ana conditions, including the hot, dry winds that blow across the region in the late fall. These winds often fan and help spread the fires.
The undeveloped areas in Rancho Mirage are characterized by steep topographic gradients that are generally conducive to spreading wildfires. Furthermore, the area’s hot, dry summer and autumn weather is ideal for generating the dry vegetation that fuels most wildfires. Fortunately, the only recorded historical wildfire near the planning area is the Dry Falls fire that occurred in August 1980 to the southeast of Rancho Mirage. The reason that most of the undeveloped areas of Rancho Mirage have not been impacted by wildland fire is that most of the rugged terrain is so steep, rocky, and dry that few plants thrive in the area. As a result, the amount of fuel available for wildland fires is very limited, and the distance between stands of vegetation is too great for fires to spread easily.
In the developed areas of Rancho Mirage, the landscape
vegetation is carefully maintained and watered regularly, creating conditions that limit the possibility for vegetation fires to ignite and spread.
The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal- Fire) ranks fire hazard of wildland areas of the state using four main criteria: fuels, weather, assets at risk, and level of service. Although Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) are mapped in the Rancho Mirage area, the historical record indicates that the wildland fire hazard in Rancho Mirage is relatively low. CalFire has mapped several fire hazard zones in Rancho Mirage and the SOI, shown in Exhibit 27.
There are no state responsibility areas (SRAs) in the City of Rancho Mirage. The only Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone in Local Responsibility Area (LRA) within the City is in the southern end of urban areas. The VHFHSZ consists of part of a single-family residence (70000 Thunderbird Mesa Drive) and undeveloped land. The undeveloped portion is designated as Mountain Reserve per the Land Use Map and will not be developed in the future.
Urban and Structural Fires
To quantify the structural fire risk in a community it is necessary for the local fire departments to evaluate all occupancies based upon their product type, size, construction type, built-in protection (such as internal fire sprinkler systems), and risk (high-occupancy versus low-occupancy) to determine if they can control a fire if it occurs in the types of structures identified. In newer residential areas where construction includes fire-resistant materials and internal fire sprinklers, most structural fires can be confined to the building or property of origin. In older residential areas where the building materials may not be fire-rated and the structures are not fitted with fire sprinklers, there is a higher probability of a structural fire impacting adjacent structures. With the varied type and age of structures in Rancho Mirage, structural fire risk is divided into four categories:
› High Probability/High Consequences (e.g., multi-family dwellings, high-occupancy hotels and resorts, single-family residential homes in the older sections of Rancho Mirage, hazardous materials occupancies, and large shopping centers › Low Probability/High Consequences (e.g., hospitals and other medical facilities, mid-size shopping malls, industrial occupancies, office complexes, and upscale homes in the hills or mountains, in or adjacent to high to very high fire threat areas)
› High Probability/Low Consequences (e.g., older detached single-family dwellings with properly maintained landscaping) › Low Probability/Low Consequences (e.g., newer detached single-family dwellings and small office buildings with properly maintained landscaping).
Most buildings and structures in the City are not in or adjoining a mountainous area or lands covered by forest, brush or grass or other flammable material. Therefore, no mandatory clearance 9-377
9 Safety Element
around the structures applies per Public Resources Code Section 4291. Those buildings or structures immediately adjoining the mountainous areas in the south of the City would need to provide clearance as required by law. Within the City, there is only one development (70000 Thunderbird Mesa Drive) partially located in a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone, and the only evacuation route would be via Thunderbird Mesa Drive downhill to Highway 111.
The City maintains roadway standards that are detailed in the Circulation Element of this General Plan, which include minimum road widths to ensure accessibility for emergency vehicles and crew under various conditions.
Fire services for the City of Rancho Mirage are provided through a cooperative agreement with the State of California (Cal-Fire) and Riverside County. Cal-Fire/Riverside County Fire Department is an all risk, full service fire department and has two fire stations located strategically throughout Rancho Mirage to provide highly effective protection. Fire Station 69 serves North Rancho Mirage at 71751 Gerald Ford Drive, and Fire Station 50 serves South Rancho Mirage at 70801 Highway 111. Additionally, the City
participates in the regional cooperative agreement and benefits from resources responding from other nearby stations, ensuring that peak loads and major incidents are handled promptly. There are no gaps in the City for emergency service, and all areas including the VHFHSZ have adequate access to fire and emergency
services.
Peak Water Demand and Supply
The availability of water is critical to effective fire suppression. The CVWD provides water services to Rancho Mirage and has a total groundwater storage capacity of 30 million acre-feet (one acre- foot equals 325,850 gallons) in the Indio Subbasin. The City and its SOI maintains a peak summer daily water demand of 41 mgd (approximately 126 acre-feet). CalFire has general water flow requirements of 1,500 gallons per minute (gpm) for new
development and 3,000 gpm for new commercial development.
Table 36 lists fire suppression water flow requirements by land use.
TABLE 36 WATER FLOW REQUIREMENTS FOR FIRE PROTECTION
LAND USE WATER FLOW
Agriculture / Open Space 1,000 gpm for 2 hours
Single-family Residential 1,500 gpm for 2 hours
Multi-family Residential / High Density 2,500 gpm for 2 hours Commercial / Industrial 3,000 gpm for 3 hours
Source: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection 2004
According to Insurance Services Office, Inc., the fire suppression system rating for Rancho Mirage is Class 3. This includes fire dis- patch (operators, alarm dispatch circuits, telephone lines available), fire department (equipment available, personnel, training, distribution of companies), and water supply (adequacy, condition, number and installation of fire hydrants). The rating scale is from 1 to 10 with the worst rating being a Class 10 and the best rating a Class 1. CalFire has a five-year plan that outlines fire hazards and risks, cost effectiveness, and present and future fire protection needs.
Emergency Preparedness
The purpose of emergency preparedness is to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the general public before, during, and after natural and human emergencies. These emergencies include flooding, high winds, earthquakes, hazardous material accidents, wild- fire, and other natural and man-made events. The City maintains a multi-hazard functional plan, that addresses the planned response to extraordinary emergency situations
associated with natural or human caused disasters, technological incidents, and nuclear defense operations. Additionally, the City and Eisenhower Medical Center have partnered to establish an Emergency Operations Center at Sunnylands.
The City adopted an update to its Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP) in 2018. The City’s LHMP is integrated into Riverside County’s LHMP as an annex to ensure a unified and coordinated effort by all cities within the County in the event of a disaster.
County of Riverside Multi-Jurisdictional Local
Hazard Mitigation Plan
The City participates in the Riverside County Multi-Jurisdictional Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP). The County’s LHMP was most recently updated and adopted by the County of Riverside in 2018, and approved by FEMA that same year. The 2018 plan updated the 2012 plan, and according to the text in the document itself, carries the very same purpose, which is to create a safer community. The goals and objectives, along with any mitigation strategies that are listed in the County’s LHMP and which may be relevant in Rancho Mirage, shall be considered appurtenant to the Goals, Policies, and Programs in this General Plan.
In addition to emergency services provided by the Riverside County Fire Department, the California Department of Forestry, and the Sheriff’s Department, the American Red Cross provides a wide range of emergency response support services in Rancho Mirage, ranging from a single residential fire to community-wide disasters.
Evacuation Routes
The availability of evacuation routes is critical in times of emergencies. Rancho Mirage’s location in the Coachella Valley allows for two main evacuation routes (I-10 and Highway 111) along with primary and minor arterial streets serving as secondary routes. Since earthquakes, floods, fires, or other disasters may render certain routes impassible, specific evacuation routes may need to be designated during an emergency.
FIRE HAZARDS GOALS, POLICIES, AND PROGRAMS
GOAL SAFE 3
Protection of the lives and property of residents, business owners, and visitors from structural and wildland fires.
GOAL SAFE 4
Emergency preparedness and response programs that provide for fast and effective response to daily emergencies and major catastrophes.
POLICY SAFE 4.1
The City shall minimize the exposure of residents, business owners, and visitors to the impacts of structural and wildland fires.
PROGRAM SAFE 4.1A
Maintain a weed abatement program to ensure clearing of dry brush areas. The Public Works Department and Code Compliance Division shall monitor public and private roads clearance.
Coordinate with the Fire Department to assess the need of community fire breaks and devise a plan for long-term
maintenance, where necessary.
POLICY SAFE 4.2
The City shall conduct long-range fire safety planning, including enforcement of stringent building, fire, subdivision and other Municipal Code standards, improved infrastructure, and mutual aid agreements with other public agencies and the private sector.
PROGRAM SAFE 4.2A
Require properties within or adjacent to Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones to comply with Riverside County Fire Department Wildfire Safety Recommendations for fuel modification plans and defensible space. Coordinate with the Fire Department to reach out to property owners and achieve compliance on the
recommendations and additional requirements, including visible home address and street signage.
PROGRAM SAFE 4.2B
Evaluate the adequacy of access routes to and from hazard areas relative to the degree of development or use (e.g., road width, road type, length of dead- end roads, etc.) Development of non- conforming sites requires a conditional use permit. The city will coordinate with the fire department through the CUP process to address substandard fire safety standards, especially regarding roads and vegetative hazards.
9-3782017 General Plan
10 PROGRAM SAFE 4.2C
Maintain the City’s emergency plan, including an inventory and evaluation of all local and regional emergency resources.
PROGRAM SAFE 4.2D
The City shall consider the development and identification of citywide evacuation routes.
PROGRAM SAFE 4.2E
Require redevelopment in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ) to comply with the latest California Building Standards Code (Title 24), including the California Fire Code (Part 9).
Coordinate with the Fire Department on evaluation of rebuilding after a large fire and require additional fire safe measures where necessary.
POLICY SAFE 4.3
The City shall support area-wide mutual aid agreements and communication links with Riverside County authorities and other participating jurisdictions.
PROGRAM SAFE 4.3A
The City shall adhere to the guidelines set forth in the County of Riverside Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan.
POLICY SAFE 4.4
The City shall ensure adequate provision of public information to residents and businesses on actions to minimize damage and facilitate recovery from a natural disaster. Prioritize at-risk populations such as those within or near fire hazard zones.
PROGRAM SAFE 4.4A
Coordinate with public agencies and non-profit organizations to promote emergency preparedness and response training such as the Riverside County Community Emergency Response Team
(CERT) program and the Coachella Valley Disaster Preparedness Network (CVDPN) training and resources.
Hazardous and Toxic Materials
Purpose
The Hazardous and Toxic Materials section identifies existing hazardous and toxic material locations in the community and describes the regulatory environment established to safely manage these materials. The intent of the section is to reinforce the City’s concern and planning for the protection of all Rancho Mirage residents and visitors from adverse impacts due to the presence of hazardous and toxic materials. The section sets forth goals, policies, and programs that will help assure an effective response to and protection from the use, storage, or transport of hazardous and toxic materials in Rancho Mirage.
Background
A wide variety of products, chemical and purified chemical compounds, and elements that are considered hazardous or toxic are used in households, commercial business- es, and industrial operations and processes. They range through home and pool related chlorine products, chemical fertilizers, herbicides and pesticides, stored fuels and waste oil, chemical solvents and lubricants, and a variety of medical materials. The improper use and management of hazardous materials can pose a significant potential threat to the community and its environment.
Community Hazardous Wastes Risks
There are only a few identified hazardous/toxic material generators in Rancho Mirage. These are associated with
commercial, quasi industrial, and medical operations, which have the potential to be connected to accidental spills, purposeful illegal dumping, air emission, and other uncontrolled discharges into the environment. All are considered “small quantity generators,” and some of those identified in Rancho Mirage include the Eisenhower Medical Center and Desert Orthopedic Center.
Eisenhower Medical Center (EMC) is a “small quantity genera- tor” of hazardous medical wastes associated with various procedures and treatments provided at the facility. Management 9-379~ ~
I
~ ;:
~
c:::J RANOiO MIRAGE CITY LIMITS
C:J RANOiO MIRAGE SOI
State Responsibi lity Area -Fire
Hazard Severity Zone Class
Very High
0.5 2Miles I
Ramon Ad
Dinah Shore Dr
Cath e d ral
City
Government Code 51175--89 directs the California Department of Forestry 11nd Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) to identify a-eas of very high fire hazard severity zones with in Local Responsibility Areas (LRA). Mapping of the areas, referred to as Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones (VHFHSZ), is based on data and models of, potential fuels over a 30-50 year time horizon and their associated expected fire behavior, and expected bum probabilites to quantify the likeihoocl aid nature of vegetation fire exposure (including firebrands) to buildings. Oeta ls on the project and specific modeling methodology can be fouro at hltp:llfrap.cdf.ca.gov/projects/hazard/methods.htm. Local Responsibftity Area VHFHSZ maps were initially developed in the mid•1990s and are now being updated based on improved science, mapping techniques, and data.
In late 2005 to t>e effective in 2000 , the Califomie Building Corrmission adopted Cdifomia Bt.ilding Code Chapter 7A requiring new OOid ings in VH FHSZs to use ignition resista nt construction methods and materia ls. These new codes inck.Jde p rovisions to improve the ignition resistarce of buildings, especiany from firebrand5 . The updated very high fire hazard seventy zones wm be used by buMding officials for new building pe rmits in LRA. The updated zones will also be used to identify property whose owners must comply with natural hazards disclosure requi rements at time of property sale and 100foot defensible space clearance. It ls lkely that lhe ftre hazard severity zones will be used fOf updates to the safety element of general plane.
This specific map is based on a geographic information system dataset tha t depicts final CAL Fl RE recommendations for Very High FHSZs w ithin the loca l jurisdiction. The process of finalizh g these bo..mdaries involved an extensive loca review process, the details of which are available at http·Jlfrap cdf ca goylprojecisAJazard/blnel/ (dick on •continue as guest without logging in"). Local government has 120 days to designate, by ordinance, very high fi re hazard severity r,, zones within itsjurisdicticr, after receiving the recommendation . local govemmentcan add additional VHFHSZs.
Rimi of! ', There is no req.iirement for local government to report their finel ection to CAL FIRE when the recommended zones er, 10r ', adopted. Consequently, users are directed to the appropriate local entity (county, city, fire department, or Fire 1J ', Protection District) to determine the status of the local fire hazard severity zone ordnance.
I ',,
'\.,,,
',, ...... ........ ',
0 ~ :c
~
'\
'':.,, .,..
Thousand
Palms
Edom
! Ger.aid Ford Dr
i ~
1n,s;not,aO,
I
I CoU"ltry Club Or
;;;
~
(,;!di •l'
VlyNdt
w,1:Hiti
ehJQe
©
11 Safety Element
and disposal of these materials is primarily the responsibility of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, with additional regulatory responsibility given to the California Office of Health Planning and Development and the Riverside County Department of Health.
EMC has developed and implemented both a Medical Waste
Management Plan and a Hazardous Materials Management
Program, which set forth policies, programs, and procedures for handling, storage, use, and disposal of these materials. Wastes are stored in controlled conditions onsite and removed every 90 days, with storage typically limited to less than 100 gallons each 90 days.
Additionally, there are other sites that have been or should be monitored. These include other waste generating medical clinics and facilities, gasoline service stations, equipment and fuel storage yards, and waste haulers.
The U.S. EPA requires all service stations to retrofit or replace underground storage tanks with double walled construction. All sites in Rancho Mirage have achieved compliance with this rule.
A sanitary landfill was operated on a 57-acre site located in the southwest quarter of Section 11 in the City’s SOI, south of the Southern Pacific Railroad lines. This landfill was operated by the Cathedral City Sanitary District between 1955 and 1967 using the then standard “burn and bury” technique. From 1983 to the end of 1988, the easterly 40 acres of the site were used as a domestic sewage disposal field.
Hazardous Waste Management Plans
Per the Environmental Protection Agency of the state of California (CalEPA), Californians are protected from hazardous waste and materials by a Unified Program that ensures consistency through- out the state in regard to administrative requirements, permits,
1 Certified Unified Program Agencies
2 Riverside County Environmental
inspections and enforcement. CalEPA oversees the program as a whole, and certifies 83 local government agencies known as Certified Unified Program Agencies (CUPA) to implement the hazardous waste and materials standards set by five different state agencies.1
The Riverside County Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Branch is the sole overseeing agency for hazardous waste generation throughout the county. The purpose of the hazardous waste program is to ensure that hazardous wastes will be properly managed and disposed of in order to protect both people and environment.2
The City has the opportunity to coordinate with appropriate county, state, and federal agencies in the identification of hazardous material sites and the active regulation of their timely cleanup.
Management strategies may include establishing and maintaining information on these sites, periodic monitoring facilities, and operations that produce, utilize, or store hazardous materials in Rancho Mirage. Involvement in multi-agency monitoring of illegal dumping in Rancho Mirage, conferring in the regulation of underground storage tanks and septic systems, and regulating the transport of hazardous materials through the community is also appropriate. The City hazardous waste management policies for the General Plan are essentially an extension of the County’s policies and procedures.
Several sources provide information concerning hazardous waste sites in Rancho Mirage. The California Regional Water Quality Control Board and the CVWD maintain information concerning contaminated wells and groundwater. The state and federal environmental protection agencies and the state Department of Health also supply information concerning specific hazardous waste sites and their locations.
3 All information regarding hazardous materials was obtained from the Riverside Department of Environmental Health at
www.rivcoeh.org/hazmat
Hazardous Materials Response
Hazardous and toxic materials pose a threat to public safety if not properly regulated. CalEPA designated the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Branch as the CUPA for Riverside County. The role of the CUPA is to assure consolidation, consistency and coordination of the hazardous materials programs in the county. The CUPA also oversees the two participating agencies (the City of Corona Fire Department and the Riverside County Fire Department) that implement hazardous materials programs in the county.
The Riverside County Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Materials Branch is responsible for overseeing the six hazardous materials programs in the county. This agency is responsible for inspecting facilities that handle hazardous mate- rials, generate hazardous waste, treat hazardous waste, own/ operate underground storage tanks, own/operate aboveground petroleum storage tanks, or handle other materials subject to the California Accidental Release Program. In addition, the branch maintains an emergency response team that handles hazardous materials and other environmental health emergencies 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.3
Hazardous And Toxic Materials Goals, Policies, And
Programs
The City has the responsibility to coordinate with the appropriate agencies in the identification of hazardous material sites and the active regulation of their timely cleanup. This section’s programs of oversight and management between responsible agencies can most efficiently be implemented through regular consultation with the RWQCB and the County Health Department and by updating information on hazardous material sites and monitoring facilities that utilize or produce hazardous materials in Rancho Mirage. The
City should also remain current regarding the monitoring and regulating of underground storage tanks and septic systems and regulating the transport of hazardous materials through Rancho Mirage.
GOAL SAFE 5
The continued safety of Rancho Mirage residents and visitors through the regulation of the manufacture, transport, use, and disposal of toxic and hazardous materials.
POLICY SAFE 5.1
The City shall regulate, to the extent empowered, the delivery, use, and storage of hazardous materials in city limits and the SOI.
PROGRAM SAFE 5.1A
The City shall compile and maintain an inventory of all hazardous waste sites in Rancho Mirage and surrounding jurisdictions.
PROGRAM SAFE 5.1B
The City shall develop a permitting process for the establishment of facilities that manufacture, store, use, or dispose of hazardous and toxic materials in the community or adjacent areas, should it be determined that the need for such a use be realized.
POLICY SAFE 5.2
The City shall require and facilitate the safe and responsible disposal and cleanup of all hazardous/toxic waste and waste sites in Rancho Mirage and the SOI.
PROGRAM SAFE 5.2A
The City shall coordinate with the appropriate state and federal agencies to activate procedures for the cleanup of existing and future hazardous and toxic waste sites. 9-3802017 General Plan
12 PROGRAM SAFE 5.2B
The City shall prepare and/or disseminate information and instructive education program materials for residents, including direction on the identification and proper management and disposal of household hazardous waste.
PROGRAM SAFE 5.2C
To the extent empowered, the City shall prohibit the disposal of automotive and household hazardous and toxic materials in landfills.
PROGRAM SAFE 5.2D
The City shall coordinate with Burrtec and other appropriate public and quasi-public agencies to sponsor and develop drop off locations for hazardous or toxic household products for all Rancho Mirage residents.
PROGRAM SAFE 5.2E
The City shall coordinate with appropriate agencies to identify the locations and monitor the use of all underground fuel storage tanks located in city limits with the potential to release hazardous or toxic materials into the environment.
POLICY SAFE 5.3
The City shall coordinate with the Fire and Sheriff’s Department to develop a system for roadway management and for alerting emergency and medical facilities to the impending transport of hazardous and toxic materials.
PROGRAM SAFE 5.3A
The City shall coordinate with appropriate departments and agencies to establish transportation management and contingency emergency procedures and training programs for police, fire, medical, and other organizations that would be involved in an airborne release or ground spill of hazardous and toxic materials or waste.
4 Cal-Adapt
PROGRAM SAFE 5.3B
Follow the response procedures as outlined by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health in the event of hazardous materials emergency.
POLICY SAFE 5.4
The City shall coordinate with the Regional Water Quality Control Board and the CVWD to monitor and regulate the use and phased removal of subsurface sewage disposal systems.
PROGRAM SAFE 5.4A
Through the subdivision and development review process, the City shall require, to the greatest extent practical, the connection of new development to the sewage collection system of the CVWD.
PROGRAM SAFE 5.4B
The City shall cooperate with the appropriate agencies to help assure that all subsurface sewage disposal systems, upon completion of their use, are properly removed from service.
POLICY SAFE 5.5
The City shall actively oppose any plan or attempt to establish hazardous and toxic waste dumps/landfills or hazardous industrial processes with the potential to adversely affect Rancho Mirage or the SOI.
PROGRAM SAFE 5.5A
The City shall coordinate with CVAG and its member cities to actively organize against and oppose any County, state, federal, or private effort to build or operate hazardous or toxic waste dumps/landfills or to operate hazardous industrial processes, which cannot be mitigated and have the potential to adversely affect Rancho Mirage or the SOI.
Climate Change
Purpose
Climate change is already affecting California cities, as seen by the rise in sea levels, average temperatures, and extreme hot days.
These climate driven changes have many consequences that affect California’s health and prosperity such as the increased frequency of wildfires, pressure on water supplies, shifts in growing seasons, and the increase in populations that will be exposure to intense heat waves.
Rancho Mirage recognizes that understanding its vulnerability and planning for the increased effects of climate change is crucial to the livelihood and safety of its residents. This Climate Change section provides a brief overlook of the leading climate factors that affect Rancho Mirage and its vulnerability to each. The intent of this section is to reinforce the City’s concern for the protection of all Rancho Mirage residents and visitors from the adverse impacts of climate change and to set forth goals, policies, and programs that will help the City to adapt to these changes.
Background
As discussed in the Conservation and Open Space Element, Rancho Mirage is already subject to extreme temperatures and aridity, and the intensity of these conditions will only increase with climate change. The three major climate factors that will impact Rancho Mirage in the future are temperature, precipitation, and wildfire risk.
Temperature
Average Temperature
Overall temperatures are expected to rise throughout this century.
During the next few decades, scenarios project average
temperature to rise between 1 and 2.3°F. Rancho Mirage has already experienced a 2.0°F increase compared to the end of the last century (i.e., 1961-1990). This change in temperature is projected to increase to 3.0°F by 2040. Currently, the average annual temperature for Rancho Mirage is approximately 74°F. The temperature can drop into the low 30's in the winter and can exceed 120°F in the summer.
Extreme Heat Days
The most serious threats to the public health of Californians will stem primarily from the increased frequency of extreme conditions, principally more frequent extreme heat days, and more frequent, intense, and longer heat waves. An extreme heat day is typically defined as a day in April through October where the maximum temperature exceeds the 98th historical percentile of maximum temperatures, based on daily temperature data between 1961 and 1990. A heat wave is defined as five or more consecutive extreme heat days. An increase in heat waves may increase the risk of directly related conditions such as heat stroke and dehydration.
An extreme heat day for Rancho Mirage is when the temperature exceeds 114°F.43 Even though the number of heat days varies from year-to-year, the average is projected to increase in the future (Exhibit 28). As the number of heat days per year steadily increases over time, Rancho Mirage must be prepared to protect its resident’s health and safety.
Precipitation
Changes in precipitation patterns will affect public health primarily through extreme events such as floods, droughts and wildfires. In addition, higher temperatures combined with changes in
precipitation patterns create conditions that are more conducive to the occurrence and spread of infectious diseases. On average, the projections show little change in total annual precipitation in California. Furthermore, precipitation projections do not show a consistent trend during the next century. However, even modest changes would have a significant impact because California ecosystems are conditioned to historical precipitation levels and water resources are nearly fully utilized.
Rancho Mirage has had an average rainfall of 5.74 inches over the last 30 years, which is 85 percent less than the average nationwide, and 77 percent less than the average in California.
Average rainfall in Rancho Mirage is predicted to decline to approximately four inches per year by 2040. This decrease in annual precipitation is not expected to have a significant impact on Rancho Mirage, due to the limited amount of water they already receive. 9-381
13 Safety Element
Wildfire Risk
Decreased precipitation and drought also result in increased frequency and duration of wildfires, another significant risk to public health. Wildfire frequency and intensity is expected to grow as temperatures increase and vegetation dries due to longer dry seasons, especially in mountainous areas. In addition to the as- sociated direct risk of fatalities, wildfires can lead to immediate and long-term adverse public health problems due to exposure to smoke. Smoke from wildfires is a mixture of carbon dioxide, water vapor, carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons and other organic
chemicals, nitrogen oxides, trace metals, and fine particulate matter from burning trees, plants, and built structures. During wildfires, large populations can be exposed to a complex mixture of pollutant gases and particles, which can have both acute and chronic health impacts. Smoke can irritate the eyes, harm the respiratory system, and worsen chronic heart and lung disease, including asthma. People with existing cardiopulmonary diseases are generally at the greatest risk from smoke inhalation, with age being a complicating risk factor for the exposed population.
Further details regarding wildfire in Rancho Mirage are de- scribed in Fire Hazards above.
Climate Change Goals, Policies, And Programs
The City has the responsibility to coordinate with state, regional, and County agencies to establish and maintain an up-to-date database on climate change conditions in the region, legislation affecting the City’s regulatory responsibilities, and changing technical assessments that refine or re-characterize the climate change impacts affecting the region. The City should also monitor the effectiveness of its adaptation strategies. The City’s development review process must assure that development proposals are thoroughly evaluated with regard to climate change and that comprehensive mitigation measures are developed and implemented. The City will need to take a proactive role to assure the public is safe by informing them about severity of climate change impacts and what resources are available to them to mitigate these impacts.
GOAL SAFE 6
Maintenance of Rancho Mirage as a safe place with a high- quality of life for its residents, businesses, and visitors in the face of climate change.
POLICY SAFE 6.1
The City shall identify and periodically reassess local climate change vulnerabilities.
PROGRAM SAFE 6.1A
Conduct a climate change vulnerability assessment of vulnerable populations, structures, and functions.
PROGRAM SAFE 6.1B
Review the findings of the climate change vulnerability assessment with relevant City departments to ensure that vulnerable community populations, structures, and functions are understood and that appropriate actions are taken to protect these vulnerabilities.
POLICY SAFE 6.2
The City shall develop adaptation measures that address the climate change impacts on Rancho Mirage’s residents, businesses, and visitors.
PROGRAM SAFE 6.2A
Develop a heat response plan that includes identification of cooling centers and promotion of urban heat mitigation strategies.
PROGRAM SAFE 6.2B
Improve wildfire prevention through regulations of new
development, establish and/or maintain cooperative fire agreements, and increase vegetation management efforts to reduce wildfire potential.
9-3820 C") -~ ---= 0 N ... i:;; ~ ...,;: iii-= -~ ... ~ ~ .. ~ .. ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0600 0800 0L00 0900 OS-00 0v00 0£00 0 G) 0W0 >-Ol00 0000 066l C 086l 0 OL6l a... 0 096l ~ Q) OS'6l C Q) ~ "" r--0 N
14 PROGRAM SAFE 6.2C
Incorporate newly identified adaptation measures into planning documents, including the Hazard Inventory and Hazard Mitigation Plan, as appropriate.
POLICY SAFE 6.3
The City shall support initiatives, legislation, and actions to respond to climate change and consider potential climate change impacts in planning and decision making processes.
PROGRAM SAFE 6.3A
Coordinate adaptation planning with other planning, including future General Plan/ land use code updates.
POLICY SAFE 6.4
The City shall work with local organizations to raise awareness about climate change impacts.
PROGRAM SAFE 6.4A
Collaborate with community-based organizations (e.g., health care providers, public health advocates, fire prevention organizations) to disseminate public preparedness and emergency response information related to climate change.
9-383CalFIRE personnel fight a blaze in nearby
Palm Desert.
9-384
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE)
CERTIFICATION
I, Kristie Ramos, City Clerk of the City of Rancho Mirage, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No . 2022-PC-01 was duly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Rancho Mirage, California, at a regular meeting thereof held on the 13 th day of January 2022, by the following vote:
AYES :
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN :
RECUSED :
Grey, Maxwell, Stewart
None.
None.
None.
Bryant.
Kristie Ramos
City Clerk
ATTACHMENT 11
PUBLIC COMMENTS
(SEE ATTACHED)
9-385
9-386
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Kristie Ramos. CMC
£lruming
FW: Case number. EA21 -005
Tuesday, January 11, 2022 9:44 :43 AM
City Seal transparent/2} efef6a3d -46a2 -4ae5-8bcb -b3298f02f64d ong 20220111 082748.jpg
Please see below/attached.
[II
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone: 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail : [email protected]
69 -825 Highway 111. Rancho Mirage . California, 92270
www .RanchoM irageCa.gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff availab le by phone and email
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p .m .
Available for in-person by appointment only
ranchomlrageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday -Saturday from 9:00 a.m . to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and it s attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: Jim Walker
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 8:33 AM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Subject: Case number. EA21 -005
CAUTION: Thi s e mail ori ginated from outsi de Th e City of Ranc ho Mirage . DO NOT CLICK links or op en attachments u nless yo u reco gn ize th e se nd e r and know th e content is sa fe.
Dear Kristie, please see my ob j ection letter to the environmenta l assessment case number li sted above.
9-387
January 10, 2022
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
RE: Environmental Assessment Case No. EA21-005
General Plan Text Amendment Case No. GPTA21-0001
Housing Element
Dear Kristie/Planning Commission Members:
I have read the draft Housing Element that is being considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. I am writing this letter to object to adopting this by resolution and amending the General Plan as such.
I am a resident of the Petersen Ranch neighborhood and am specifically objecting to the change of density to the Rancho Palms Mobile Home Park. The property currently allows 9 dwelling units per acre. The increase with the Overlay Zone, as proposed, will change the allowed density to 28 dwelling units per acre and will make available a density bonus of 50% which can bring the density to 42 units per acre.
The site currently allows 108 dwelling units. If approved, the density will allow 309 units.
This triples the currently allowed density. If the 50% bonus is allowed, there could be 518 dwelling units on 12.34 acres, an increase of 475%. I find these increases to be excessive and not in character of this neighbornood.
I urge the Planning Commission to send this document back to staff and have them remove the overlay zone and the bonus provision for this parcel from the Housing Element.
Sincerely,
Address: 763/5 ~~S.F:f!-:T cov,g rJVE &ca t/'.J;;. 7o
9-388
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Kr ist ie Ramos. CMC
.!:12nning
FW: Housing Element -Peterson
Tuesday, January 11 , 2022 9:38:48 AM
imaaeO .joeg
City Seal transpa rent /2} efef6a3d-46a2-4ae5 -8bcb-b3298f02 f64d.pnq Please see below.
Bl
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone : 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail: kristier@Ra nchoMirageCA.gov
69-825 Highway 111. Rancho Mirage , Ca li fornia, 92270 www.RanchoM irageCa .gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and email
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Ava ilable for in -person by appointment only
ranchomirageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"L ibrary to Go" Services Only
T uesday -Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: Lljessup
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 8:37 PM
To: Kr ist ie Ramos, CMC
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Housing Element -Peterson
CA UT ION: This email originated from o utside The City of Ranc ho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK l inks or open attachments un less you recognize the sender and know t he content is safe.
Dear Planning Commi ss ion,
I am p leading w ith you to STOP any considerat io n of h igh dens ity ho using i n the Peterson/ M irage Cove area!
Th is area si mply cannot accommodate any mo r e peop le, traffic, and parking ! I routine ly observe t h e obsessive amount of speed i ng cars currently racing down our streets!-It's an
9-389
accident pending!
Any further consideration of increasing the density of this area would be a disservice to the Rancho Mirage residents.
Please don't degrade our Rancho M i rage neighborhoods! I strongly object to large housing proj ects in any Rancho Mirage neighborhood zip code! Keep Rancho Mirage fabu lous !
Thank you for your support & understa nd ing,
Laura Jessup
760-275-7561
9-390
HlfllU _ ry 10 1 20,22·
f tt A.rill~ n t C M No. GPTA2 •
001
HOILJSI ·9 8Je · e · l
Oear Kri Je:iP l:anriing Comrnls ' M rnbe r :
t ire d cri dr,,ii;ft ' lrig 1. ~s b I g
oo ''8' !Bid b} t 1 Pla in · ing -· · · · · · · .
Couri~,. I if.I l II,' ·u . I ' ' .. -h ;;i .,
r . _ at ulion and a
l a ,_a 1. "''""" ..... '"' ·•mj
a 1 spec i ;
Ranc:ho naly
ICP1h1.:1 9' . , U 1e
Q\!e r1a :, · pl'i ,a
to I lin g . m,r a I«!·
e bor,tJ o 50 k:h _ 9 he
· to per acre .
e: c . · _ a l fflW 108 lfn-; umt..i!. If appr;ov!'ii!d. n •1~1~y will Qllow 30£h1 nie i~ n:Uy
.,(t d)· ty~ . ... Qt! oon J4' I ' OOil]d
. d g · · aeri "' ...... """"' ·
· • I frn , fl~ 1 e ~ 1
(; t'.er ~.5l ' I .. ·di ,
I JP,g , _ ~l,a "I "I nn 1Co S!Jt l) t E'ill f
o staff and ha-'li 1 reim on e ain
nu:s, p-rm.rl 011 fa paroo ·
r,t .
S r11c.o. ely,.
L~ urei, J'oss up Adi retis :
9-391
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Kristie Ramos CMC
Tyler Fowlkes
£Iannio.g : Marcus Aleman
FW: Housing Element Letter In Opposition -Planning Commission Wednesday, January 12, 2022 11:33:45 AM
City Sea l tra nsparentC2} efef6a3d-46a2-4ae5-8bcb-b3298f02f64d.png RM Housing Element Letter 120220112 10570363 .pd f
Please see be low /attached.
Bl
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone: 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail: [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage , California, 92270
www .Ra nchoMirageCa .gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff availab le by phone and email
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in-person by appointment only
ranchomirageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday -Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disc losure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2022 11:00 AM
To: Kr istie Ramos, CMC
Subject: Housing Element Letter In Opposition -Planning Commission CAUTION: Th is ema il origin at ed fro m outside Th e City of Rancho Mirage . DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments un less yo u recogn ize t he sender and know t he content is safe.
One more ...
9-392
January 10, 2022
Kristie Ramos, City Cferk
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
RE: Environmental Assessment Case No . EA21--005
General Plan Text Amendment Case No. GPT A21-0001
Housing Element
Dear Kristie/Planning Commission Members:
I have read the draft Housing Element that is being considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. I am writing this Jetter to object to adopting this by resolution and amending the General Plan as such.
I am a resident of the Petersen Ranch neighborhood and am specifically objecting to the change of density to the Rancho Palms Mobile Home Park. The property currently allows 9 dwelling units per acre. The increase with the Overlay Zone, as proposed, will change the allowed density to 28 dwelling units per acre and will make available a density bonus of 50% which can bring the density to 42 units per acre.
The site currently allows 108 dwelling units. If approved, the density will allow 309 units .
This triples the currentry allowed density . If the 50% bonus is allowed, there could be 518 dwelling units on 12.34 acres, an increase of 475%. I find these increases to be excessive and not in character of this neignoornooa.
I urge the Planning Commission to send this document back to staff and have them remove the overlay zone and the bonus provision for this parcel from the Housing Element.
Sincerely,
70 -13 D M: f).f,;~ ~lo (fo-DI<..
Address: ____________ _
9-393
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Kristie Ramos CMC
[email protected]
FW: Letter of Objection -Rancho Palms Mobi le Home Park Tuesday, January 11, 2022 2:32:29 PM
City Sea l transparent121 efef6a3d -46a2 -4ae5 -8bcb -b3298f02f64d.png RM Housing Element (243711.docx
Please see attached letter.
[i]
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone: 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail : kristier@RanchoMirageCA .gov
69-825 Highway 111 , Rancho Mirage . California, 92270
www RanchoMirageCa gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and e mail
Monday -Friday from 9 :00 a.m. to 4:30 p .m.
Available for in-p erson by appointment only
ranchomirageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday -Saturday from 9:00 a .m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and it s attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250 , et seq.) From: LIS VVSl
Sent: Tuesday, Janua ry 11, 2022 1 :23 PM
To: Kr istie Ramos, CMC
Subject: Letter of Objection -Rancho Pa l m s Mob il e Home Park CAUTION: Thi ,s emai l originated from o utside The City o f Ranc ho M i rage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments un less you recognize the sender and know t he conte nt is safe.
Thank you.
Lisa McFadden
38900 Kelley Lane
Rancho Mirage, CA. 92270
760-992-6500
"When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time." Maya Angelou
9-394
January 10 , 2022
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
RE: Environmenta l Assessment Case No. EA21-005
General Plan Text Amendment Case No . GPTA21-0001
Housing Element
Dear Kristie/Planning Commission Members:
I have read the draft Housing Element that is being considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. I am writing this letter to object to adopting this by resolution and amending the General Plan as such.
I am a resident of the Petersen Ranch neighborhood and am specifically objecting to the change of density to the Rancho Palms Mobile Home Park. The property currently allows 9 dwelling units per acre. The increase with the Overlay Zone, as proposed, will change the allowed density to 28 dwelling units per acre and will make available a density bonus of 50% which can bring the density to 42 units per acre.
The site currently allows 108 dwelling units. If approved, the density will allow 309 units.
This triples the currently allowed density. If the 50% bonus is allowed, there could be 518 dwelling units on 12 .34 acres, an increase of 475%. I find these increases to be excessive and not in character of this neighborhood .
I urge the Planning Commission to send this document back to staff and have them remove the overlay zone and the bonus provision for this parcel from the Housing Element.
Sincerely,
LISA MCFADDEN
38900 KELLEY LANE
RANCHO MIRAGE, 92270
9-395
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Kr istie Ramos. CMC
Ty ler Fowlkes
ffilnnio.g ; Marcus Aleman
FW : Letter Regarding Housing Over lay
Wednesday, January 12, 2022 11 :3 0:24 AM
City Seal transoarent/2} efef6a3d-46a2-4ae5-8bcb-b329Bf02f64d .png RM Housi ng Element .docx
Please see be low/attached.
[i1
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City C lerk
Phone: 760 -324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail: [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111. Rancho Mirage . California, 92270
www.RanchoMirageCa.gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and email
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in-person by appointment only
ranchomiragcca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday -Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragclibra ry.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and it s attachments may be subjec t to di sc losure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: Kay Wi lli ams
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:59 PM
To: Kristie Ramos, CM C
Subject: Letter Regard i ng Hou sing Overlay
f AUTION: This emai l originated from outside The City of Ranc ho Mirage . DO NOT CLICK li n ks or open attachments u nles s you recogn ize the sender and know the content is sa f e.
To Whom It May Concern:
Please see the attached lett er regarding the low in co m e hou sing. I suppo rt the low in come hou sing cur r e ntly in my neighborhood and have no is sue s with the propose d area as it has been. I do not fe el that accepting th is property into the "overlay" is beneficia l to the commu nity. Th e location does not support that larg e of an in crease.
9-396
Sincere ly ,
Kay Williams
38600 Peterson Road
Rancho Mira ge
9-397
January 10, 2022
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
69 -825 Highway 11 1
Rancho Mirage , CA 92270
RE : Environmental Assessment C a se No . EA21 -005
General Plan Text Amendment Case No. GPTA21 -0001
Housing Element
Dear Kristie/Planning Commission Members :
I have read the draft Housing Element t hat is being considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. I am writing this letter to object to adopting this by resolution and amending the General Plan as such .
I am a resident of the Petersen Ranch neighborhood and am specifically objecting to the change of density to the Rancho Palms Mobile Home Park. The property currently allows 9 dwelling units per acre . The increase with the Overlay Zone , as proposed, will change the allowed density to 28 dwelling units per acre and will make available a density bonus of 50% which can bring the density to 42 units per acre.
The site currently allows 108 dwelling units. If approved, the density will allow 309 units .
This triples the currently allowed density . If the 50% bonus is allowed, there could be 518 dwelling units on 12.34 acres, an increase of 475%. I find these increases to be excessive and not in character of this neighborhood.
I urge the Planning Commission to send th is document back to staff and have them remove the overlay z one and the bonus provision for this parcel from the Housing Element.
Sincerely,
Address: --------------
9-398
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Kr istie Ramos. CMC
Jv ler Fowlkes
eI.annirlg ; Marcus Aleman
FW : Pl ease do not do this
Wednesday, Janu ary 12. 2022 11:34:57 AM
City Sea l transparen t(2l efef6a3d-46a2-4ae5-8bcb-b329BF02f64d.png Q.Q.LiQg
Please see attached.
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone : 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail : [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111 . Rancho Mirage , California , 92270 www Ranc hoM irageCa.gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and e mail
Monday -Friday from 9 :00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
A vai lab le for in -pe rs on by appointm e nt only
ranc hom irageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday -Saturday from 9 :00 a .m. to 6:00 p.m
ra nch om ir age library.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the conte nt of this e-mail and its attachments may be s ubj ect to di s clo s ur e pursuant to th e C alifornia Public Records Act (Government Code section 62 50, e t seq.) From: Deni se Rob e rg e
Sent: W edn es day, Ja nu ary 1 2, 2022 11:13 AM
To: Kri stie Ramo s, CMC
Subject: Plea se d o not d o thi s
CAUTION: This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments un less you recogn ize the sender and know t he content is safe.
9-399
..,
January 10, 2022
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
RE: Environmental Assessment Case No . EA21-005
General Plan Text Amendment Case No. GPTA21-0001
Housing Element
Dear Kristie/Planning Commission Members :
I have read the draft Housing Element that is being considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. I am writing this letter to object to adopting this by 1 resolution and a!T)ending the General Plan as such . '' I am a resident of the Petersen Ranch neighborhood and am specifically objecting to the change of density to the Rancho Pa lms Mobile Home Park. The property current ly allows 9 dwelling units per acre . The increase with the Overlay Zone, as proposed, will change the allowed density to 28 dwelling units per acre and will make available a density bonus of 50% which can bring the density to 42 units per acre .
The site currently allows 108 dwelling units. If approved, the density will allow 309 units .
This triples the currently allowed density. If the 50% bonus is allowed, there could be 518 dwelling units on 12.34 acres, an increase of 475%. I find these increases to be excessive and not in character of this neighborhood.
I urge the Planning Commission to send this document back to staff and have them remove the overlay zone and th e bonus provision for this parcel from the Housing Element.
Sincere ly, fJ
~£ fr6Jw9~
I
9-400
From:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Date:
Attachments:
Kr istie Ramos CMC
Ty ler Fowlkes
e.tfilJ.o.ing ; Marcus Aleman
FW: Proposed Housing "overlay"
Wednes day, Jan uary 12, 2022 11:30:44 AM
City seal transoarentr21 efef6a3d-46a2-4ae5-8bcb-b329Bf02f64d.png RM Housing Element .docx
Please see below/attached.
[il
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone : 760 -324 -45 11 Ext. 488
E-mai l: [email protected]
69-825 Hi ghway 111, Rancho Mirage. California, 92270
www.RanchoMirageCa .gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and email
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in-person by appointment only
ranchomiragcca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday -Saturday from 9:00 a .m . to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of th e content of t hi s e-mail and it s attachments may be subj ect to disclosure pursuant to th e California Pub li c Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: Kay Williams
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 7:05 PM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Subject: Proposed Hou si ng "overlay"
CAUTION: Th is ema il origin at ed fro m o ut sid e Th e City o f Ranc ho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK link s o r o pen attac hm ents u n less yo u re cog n ize t he se nd er and kn ow t he cont e nt is sa f e.
To Whom It May Concern:
I have li ved w ithin the Peterson Ranch neighborhood for 20 years. I en joy the area and the ne igh bors who live in the area. We have always had low incom e occupants and enco urage areas within our city. do not agree with having the land th at used to be a mob ile home park accepted i nto the "ove·rlay" that is being considered . The curre nt units per ac r e are acceptab l e. Having it increased beyond is not.
Please look e lsew h ere .
9-401
Please see attached.
Sincere ly,
Rona ld Wi ll iam s
38600 Peterson Ro ad
Rancho Mirage
9-402
January 10, 2022
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage , CA 92270
RE: Environmental Assessment Case No . EA21-005
General Plan Text Amendment Case No. GPTA21 -0001
Housing Element
Dear Kristie/Planning Commission Members:
I have read the draft Housing Element that is being considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. I am writing this letter to object to adopting this by resolution and amending the General Plan as such .
I am a resident of the Petersen Ranch neighborhood and am specifically objecting to the change of density to the Rancho Palms Mobile Home Park. The property currently allows 9 dwelling units per acre. The increase with the Overlay Zone, as proposed, will change the allowed density to 28 dwelling units per acre and will make available a density bonus of 50% which can bring the density to 42 units per acre.
The site currently allows 108 dwelling units. If approved, the density will allow 309 units .
This triples the currently allowed density . If the 50% bonus is allowed, there could be 518 dwelling units on 12.34 acres, an increase of 475%. I find these increases to be excessive and not in character of this neighborhood .
I urge the Planning Commission to send this document back to staff and have them remove the overlay zone and the bonus provision for this parcel from the Housing Element.
Sincerely,
Address: --------------
9-403
From: Kristie Ramos. CMC
To: £!ano.ing
Subject: Fwd : Peterson road
Date:
Attachments:
Wednesday, January 12, 2022 7:50:08 AM
Peterson rezon in g.jog
City Sea l transpare nt/21 efef6a3d-46a2-4ae5-8bcb-b329Bf02f64d png Please see below.
Sent from my iPhone
[ii
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone: 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail: [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage , California, 92270
www .RanchoMirageCa gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and email
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in-person by appointment only
ranchomirageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday -Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary,org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subjec t to disclosure pursuant to the Ca lifornia Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et se q .) Begin forwarded message:
From: j ac k swenson
Date: January 12, 2022 at 7:35:20 AM PST
To: "Kristie Ramos, CMC"
Subject: Peterson road
CAUTION : Thi s em ai l o ri ginated from o utsi de Th e Ci ty of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or ope n attachments un less you recog ni ze the se nd er and know t he co nt en t i s sa fe.
Kristie,
Here is a copy of our letter.
9-404
Thanks , Jack
[. l B 1
9-405
J ary 1.0 . 2022
. it;• C o·k
111
. CA · 2270
flVJr .me, t cas. o. 1-
{I' No . G , T 2 ' -000
ou in El , n
I El d by 1 P'I · 1n,ng
C 'l ~OU . • a ad . 'I ir. 11 ii-I)~•
;f;:11 G
!;,i y ·. ill i:1J I • ·, • it
a-el , th ro, ooul oo
· s.o ,ncn,.: as'EHJ to be
1 is. :n. . ck ~ st ff -nd
·t-p 'Cl!;)! frO ffl 11 'A:)
·,
,,; } ....... 'V' ~ J: ~~t
9-406
January 10 , 2022
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
69 -825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
RE: Environmental Assessment Case No. EA21-005
General Plan Text Amendment Case No. GPTA21 -0001
Housing Element
Dear Kristie/Planning Commission Members :
I have read the draft Housing Element that is being considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council . I am writing this letter to object to adopting this by resolution and amending the General Plan as such.
I am a resident of the Petersen Ranch neighborhood and am specifically objecting to the change of density to the Rancho Palms Mobile Home Park . The property currently allows 9 dwelling units per acre. The increase with the Overlay Zone , as proposed, will change the allowed density to 28 dwelling units per acre and will make available a density bonus of 50% which can bring the density to 42 units per acre .
The site currently allows 108 dwelling units. If approved, the density will allow 309 units .
This triples the currently allowed density . If the 50% bonus is allowed , there could be 518 dwelling units on 12 .34 acres, an increase of 475%. l find these increases to be excessive and not in character of this neighborhood .
I urge the Planning Commission to send this document back to staff and have them remove the overlay zone and the bonus provision for this parcel from the Housing Element.
Sincerely ,
9-407
January 10, 2022
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
RE: Environmental Assessment Case No. EA21 -005
General Plan Text Amendment Case No. GPTA21 -0001
Housing Element
Dear Kristie/Planning Commission Members:
I have read the draft Housing Element that is being considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. I am writing this letter to object to adopting this by resolution and amending the General Plan as such .
I am a resident of the Petersen Ranch neighborhood and am specifically objecting to the change of density to the Rancho Palms Mobile Home Park. The property currently allows 9 dwelling units per acre. The increase with the Overlay Zone, as proposed, will change the allowed density to 28 dwelling units per acre and will make available a density bonus of 50% which can bring the density to 42 units per acre.
The site currently allows 108 dwelling units. If approved, the density will allow 309 units.
This triples the currently allowed density. ff the 50% bonus is allowed, there could be 518 dwelling units on 12.34 acres, an increase of 475%. I find these increases to be excessive and not in character Of this neignborhooa .
I urge the Planning Commission to send this document back to staff and have them remove the overlay zone and the bonus provision for this parcel from the Housing Element.
Sincerely,
9-408
January 10, 2022
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
RE: Environmental Assessment Case No. EA21-005
General Plan Text Amendment Case No. GPTA21-0001
Housing Element
Dear Kristie/Planning Commission Members:
I have read the draft Housing Element that is being considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. I am writing this letter to object to adopting this by resolution and amending the General Plan as such.
I am a resident of the Petersen Ranch neighborhood and am specifically objecting to the change of density to the Rancho Palms Mobile Home Park. The property currently allows 9 dwelling units per acre. The increase with the Overlay Zone, as proposed, will change the allowed density to 28 dwelling units per acre and will make available a density bonus of 50% which can bring the density to 42 units per acre .
The site currently allows 108 dwelling units. If approved, the density will allow 309 units.
This triples the currently allowed density. If the 50% bonus is allowed, there could be 518 dwelling units on 12.34 acres, an increase of 475%. I find these increases to be excessive and not in character of this neighborhood .
I urge the Planning Commission to send this document back to staff and have them remove the overlay zone and the bonus provision for this parcel from the Housing Element.
Sincerely,
9-409
From:
To:
Kristie Ramos. CMC
iack swenson
Subject: Re : Rancho Mirage Mobile Home Park
Wednesday, January 12, 2022 7:21:38 AM Date:
Attachments: City seal transparent wrote:
CAUTION : This emai l o ri ginated from outs ide The City of Ranc ho Mi rage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recog ni ze the sender and know the co nte nt is safe .
We would like to express our strong opposition to the change in zoning of the Peterson Road Mobile Home Park. We understood that when the city purchased this property, it was to be used for single level senior housing.
9-410
Our neighborhood is adjacent to this property and we have a 1 acre minimum with many properties like our own much larger. It is a quiet idyllic neighborhood.
The concerns of h·affic , parking on Peterson , noise and potential increase in crime is of great concern to us .
We are for the original plan for senior living, but strongly against high density housing.
Thank you for your consideration,
Jack and Kathy Swenson
38590 Peterson Road
9-411
Kristie Ramos, CMC
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
jack swenson
Thursday, January 13, 2022 11 :19 AM
Kristie Ramos, CMC
Peterson Road zoning
Follow up
Completed
CAUTION : This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage . DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe .
As we have already stated, we are opposed to the Peterson Road rezoning to High density housing.
We would like to propose that the vote be continued until all public comments can be received.
Thank You,
Jack and Kathy Swenson
38590 Peterson Rd
9-412
Kristie Ramos, CMC
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Joseph Wilson
Wednesday, January 12, 2022 8:04 PM
Kristie Ramos, CMC
EA21 -00S Environmental Assesesment
Follow up
Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage . DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe .
January 12, 2022
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
RE: Environmental Assessment Case No. EA21-005
General Plan Text Amendment Case No. GPTA21-0001
Housing Element
Dear Kristie/Planning Commission Members :
I have read the draft Housing Element that is being considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. I am writing this letter to object to adopting this by resolution and amending the General Plan as such.
I am a resident of the Petersen Ranch neighborhood and am specifically objecting to the change of density to the Rancho Palms Mobile Home Park. The property currently allows 9 dwelling units per acre. The increase with the Overlay Zone, as proposed, will change the allowed density to 28 dwelling units per acre and will make available a density bonus of 50% which can bring the density to 42 units per acre.
The site currently allows 108 dwelling units. If approved, the density will allow 309 units. This triples the currently allowed density. If the 50% bonus is allowed, there could be 518 dwelling units on 12.34 acres, an increase of 475%. I find these increases to be excessive and not in character of this neighborhood.
I urge the Planning Commission to send this document back to staff and have them remove the overlay zone and the bonus provision for this parcel from the Housing Element.
Sincerely,
Joseph Wilson,_ Address: _70-300 Desert Cove Ave Rancho Mirage CA 92270 1 9-413
Kristie Ramos, CMC
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
[email protected]
Thursday, January 13, 2022 10:44 AM
Kristie Ramos, CMC
RE: Housing Element
Follow up
Flagged
CAUT ION: This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe .
Dear City Council,
I give up my speaking time to Mike Fontana.
Again, I object to increasing the density of the Mobile Home Park on Peterson.
I request that the housing element Agenda item be continued to a future hearing to allow adequate time for public input.
Lisa McFadden
38900 Kelley Lane
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
760-992-6500
"When someone shows you who they are, believe them the first time." Maya Angelou
1 9-414
Kristie Ramos, CMC
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Kay Williams
Thursday, January 13, 2022 10:21 AM
Kristie Ramos, CMC
"Housing Element"
Follow up
Flagged
CAUTION: This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage . DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
To Whom It May Concern:
It is my understanding that there is a meeting today regarding property in my Peterson Ranch neighborhood . Please note the following:
I am giving up my speaking time to Mr. Mike Fontana. He will be speaking on behalf of our neighborhood.
I object to increasing the density on the former mobile home park.
I request that the "housing element" agenda item be continued to a future hearing to allow adequate pub li c comment time.
Sincerely,
Rebecca "Kay" Williams
38600 Peterson Road
Rancho Mirage
1 9-415
Kristie Ramos, CMC
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
[email protected]
Thursday, January 13, 2022 10:28 AM
Kristie Ramos, CMC
"Housing Element"
Follow up
Flagged
CAUTION: Thi s email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage . DO NOT CLI CK links or open attachments u nle ss you recogn ize the sender and know the content is safe.
To Whom It May Concern :
This letter is in regards to the meeting taking place regarding the Peterson Ranch neighborhood , today , January 13 , 2022. Please take note of my comments below:
I am giving up my speaking time to Mike Fontana, who will be speaking on behalf of our entire neighborhood community .
As stated in an earlier letter, I object to increasing the density of the former mobile home park.
I request that the "housing element" agenda item be continued to a future hearing to allow adequate public comment time .
Sincerely,
Mr. Ronald Williams
38600 Peterson Road
Rancho Mirage
9-416
Kristie Ramos, CMC
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Attachments:
Follow Up Flag:
Flag Status:
Tom Sudinsky
Thursday, January 13, 2022 8:53 AM
Kristie Ramos, CMC
Housing Element of Environmental Assessment Case #EA21-005 Planning Commission Letter.pdf
Follow up
Flagged
CAUTION : This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage . DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you ' recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Ms. Ramos,
..
We own four properties in the immediate area of the land that was previously occupied by Rancho Mobile Home Park. We are asking that the Planning Board continue the review and not adopt the General Plan Text Amendment without additional public input and review of alternate properties that might be better suited for low-income housing.
Please include this email and the attached letter in the Planning Board packet for today's consideration.
Thank you,
Tom Sudinsky
Scott Sproles
38480 Peterson Rd.
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
9-417
January 10, 2022
Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
RE: En vironmental Assessment Case No. EA21-005
General Plan Text Amendment Case No. GPTA21 -0001
Housing Element
Dear Kristie/Planning Commission Members :
I have read the draft Housing Element that is being considered by the Planning Commission and the City Council. I am writing this letter to object to adopting this by resolution and amending the General Plan as such.
I am a resident of the Petersen Ranch neighborhood and am specifically objecting to the change of density to the Rancho Palms Mobile Home Park . The property currently allows 9 dwelling units per acre . The increase with the Overlay Zone, as proposed, will change the allowed density to 28 dwelling units per acre and will make available a density bonus of 50% which can bring the density to 42 units per acre.
The site currently allows 108 dwelling units. If approved, the density will allow 309 units.
This triples the currently allowed density. If the 50% bonus is allowed, there could be 518 dwelling units on 12.34 acres, an increase of 475%. I find these increases to be excessive and not in character of this neighborhood .
I urge the Planning Commission to send this document back to staff and have them remove the overlay zone and the bonus provision for this parcel from the Housing Element.
Address: '3P}fJ(] W~ eJ. ·
9-418
Majna Dukie
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Please see below.
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
Kristie Ramos, CMC
Monday, January 24, 2022 12:38 PM
Tyler Fow lk es
Planning; Marcus Aleman
FW: Case number. EA21 -005
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City C lerk
Phone: 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mai l: [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, Ca li forn ia, 92270 www.RanchoM irageCa.gov
City staff ava il able by phone and ema il
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Ava il ab le for in -person by appointment on ly
ranchomirageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go " Serv ices On ly
Tuesday-Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mai l and its attachments may be subject to d isc losure pursuant to the Ca li fornia Pub lic Records Act (Government Code sect ion 6250, et seq.) From: Jim Walker
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2022 10:53 AM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Subject: Re: Case number. EA21 -005
CAUTION: This emai l originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments un less you recognize the sender and know the content is safe .
Th is is a quick note that I fully support the letter sent by Mike and Lynn Fontana regarding th is case matter. We will collectively continue trying to get a peaceful resolution to avo id any litigation, However regarding the last meeting it seemed that we were pretty much ignored and for some reason there seems to be a reckless panic and unnecessary sense of urgency to get this past through without proper due diligence or consideration for our neighborhood. I would also ask you to consider that our neighborhood is already challenged with 1 9-419
many previous and current residential issues that have yet to be resolved or completed . I urge you to please look at Mike's proposal and take this into consideration.
Thank you for your cooperation in this matter and I look forward to your response.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022, 9:44 AM Kristie Ramos, CMC wrote:
Good morning,
Thank you for your letter. It will be forwarded to the Planning Commission prior to their meeting.
Best,
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone : 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail: [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
www .RanchoMirageCa.gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and email
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in-person by appointment only
ranchomirageca.gov
1 Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
, "Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday-Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) , From: Jim Walker
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 8:33 AM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Subject: Case number. EA21 -005
2 9-420
CAUTION: This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Kristie, please see my objection letter to the environmental assessment case number listed above. 3 9-421
Honorable Mayor Ted Weill
Council Members:
Steve Downs
Richard Kite
Iris Smotrich
Charles Townsend
Dear Madam and Sirs:
1-20-22
Please consider the following for the Housing Element. I oppose including the Thunder Road parcels ( above the Shell station at Hwy 111 and Peterson Road) and the former mobile home park on Peterson Road. This letter includes information the Planning Department and Planning Commission did not have and was not included in the Planning Commission Hearing on January 13, 2022.
The below states reasons and facts why three parcels noted should be in Housing Element overlay. Rancho Mirage quota (1,741 units) for low-income housing can easily be met by the three parcels proposed, yielding over 2,600 units.
Low-income housing is not the objection. It is the locations with densities that are opposed.
1) The problems, negative impacts and objections to the Palms and Sands proposed 5 5 homes on 4 ½ acres carry over to Thunder Road and Peterson Road parcels. The negative impacts of high-density development in a low-density residential neighborhood include, decisions of existing property owners and prospective ones to invest and develop. To wit, the one-acre parcel on East side of Palms and Sands property was in escrow. The buyer cancelled escrow upon learning that Palms and Sands 55 homes were proposed next door.
There are 19 acres in multiple parcels for sale North of Mirage Cove
9-422
along Peterson Road that would be negatively impacted by the MHP at 28 units /ac.
2) The CVWD has a prohibition on building homes within 300' of the flood channels unless the channel is "lined" along the subject property.
The channel behind the Peterson Road mobile home property is only partially lined. Therefore, housing prohibited in the first 300' along the channel. This property could be used for a 5-acre park bordering the Butler Abrams Trail. This property was intended for Senior housing prior to Redevelopment Agencies being closed down by the State. The remaining 7-acres could be Senior housing like Santa Rosa Villas on the South side, providing approximately 50 homes. Further, if the City and CVWD were to approve housing within the 300' prohibition zone, would they be subject to inverse condemnation lawsuits by owners of parcels denied development within the 300' zone?
Summary
Prior to the January 13, 2022 Planning Commission Hearing, notice was not sent to the property owners within 500' of the Planning Department Housing Element proposed parcels. With adequate time for residents' comments, the overwhelming consensus is that Peterson Road MHP and Thunder Road parcels should not be changed to ultra-high-density (28 units or more) and not be included in the "Housing Element" overlay. 13 acres Hwy 111
This parcel across from Motel 6 is surrounded on 3 sides by mountains and HWY 111 frontage on 4th side. 28 units per acre yields 364 units.
Buildings at rear along mountain could be 3 story. Hwy 111 is a major road and has bus transportation within walking distance of parcel.
9-423
This parcel was approved several years ago for a boutique hotel, rental condos and commercial office space. The applicant tried unsuccessfully to find a buyer/hotel developer. The property is for sale now. A hotel and rental condos on the parcel are not financially feasible and are not market attractive for such development. The list price is $8,000,000.00. 364 units are approximately $22,000/unit, a reasonable land cost for low-income housing. The parcel is also within walking distance of large employer ( casino at Date Palm and Hwy 111) and Cathedral City Civic Center.
The acreage along Hwy 111, just East of City Hall and across from Atrium/Palms Cafe is more attractive for a boutique hotel and rental condos.
It satisfies Rancho Mirage's vision for a hotel and mixed-use development. 40 acres adjacent to Rancho Mirage High School
40 acres at 28 units per acre yields 1,120 units. The proposed plan is to have only 9 units per acre. Benefits for low-income, high-density housing:
1) Major road/thoroughfare that connects to Ramon and Dinah Shore for East/West travel.
2) Large employment base at Mission Hills Country Club, Westin Hotel, Westin Timeshare Villas and Del Webb development.
3) Rancho Mirage High School could be used for evening classes, G.E.D. education and recreation. High school age children could walk to school.
City owned land 50 acres
This land is between the Rancho Mirage Dog Park and Home Depot Center. Using only 40 acres with 28 units per acre, yields 1,120 units. 10+ acres could be open space, and /or public park.
9-424
Benefits
1) Dinah Shore Drive frontage -major arterial
2) Walking distance to stores and restaurants
3) Walking distance to a large, concentrated employment base. Low- income residents need housing and employment opportunities. The latter is critical to moving up the economic scale and transitioning to non -subsidized housing. This parcel could be a "master-planned community" and a model for low-income housing.
The City Council backed by a large majority of residents stopped CV Link from going through Rancho Mirage and prohibited short-term rentals. The negative impacts on the city and neighborhoods would have been disastrous.
We implore the Council to use the same reasoning and protect the two neighborhoods of Peterson Road/Mirage Cove and Thunder Road.
CC: Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager
Jeremy Gleim, Development Director
9-425
Majna Dukie
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Kristie Ramos, CMC
Monday, January 24, 2022 12:35 PM
Tyler Fowlkes
Planning; Marcus Aleman
FW: Council Letter 1-20-22.docx.pdf
Council Letter 1-20-22.docx.pdf
Please see below/attached.
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone: 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail: [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
www.RanchoMirageCa.gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and email
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in -person by appointment only
ranchomi rageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday -Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: Lljessup
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2022 10:28 PM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Subject: Council Letter 1-20-22 .docx.pdf
CAUTION: This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe .
Hello again
Rancho Mirage City Council,
I am reaching out (again) to make it known that I strongly oppose any high density housing in the Mirage cove/ Peterson area.
9-426
As I have stated repeatedly, we are inundated with speeding cars as "pass-thru" traffic -and that combined with any new density is certainly an accident guarantee.
People already park in front of my mailbox when visiting the Senior Center, because their traffic backs up all the way down the street.
We chose this area for a reason, and we happily complied to the 1 SFR per acre restriction the City imposed on us during the building process.
My hope is that the City will continue to take care of AND PROTECT its residents! r/1 Please don't ruin our property value by further considering overloading the area into a high density zone .
Please keep our Rancho Mirage rural residences fabulous ! There are plenty of other better suited zones you can utilize for maximum density purposes .
I speak for (and with) all my surrounding neighbors.
Thank you (again) for your time!
Respectfully,
Laura Jessup
Mirage Cove Drive
760-275 -7561
Sent from my iPhone
2 9-427
Honorable Mayor Ted Weill
Council Members:
Steve Downs
Richard Kite
Iris Smotrich
Charles Townsend
Dear Madam and Sirs:
1-20-22
Please consider the following for the Housing Element. I oppose including the Thunder Road parcels ( above the Shell station at Hwy 111 and Peterson Road) and the former mobile home park on Peterson Road. This letter includes information the Planning Department and Planning Commission did not have and was not included in the Planning Commission Hearing on January 13, 2022.
The below states reasons and facts why three parcels noted should be in Housing Element overlay. Rancho Mirage quota (1,741 units) for low-income housing can easily be met by the three parcels proposed, yielding over 2,600 units.
Low-income housing is not the objection. It is the locations with densities that are opposed.
1) The problems, negative impacts and objections to the Palms and Sands proposed 5 5 homes on 4 ½ acres carry over to Thunder Road and Peterson Road parcels. The negative impacts of high-density development in a low-density residential neighborhood include, decisions of existing property owners and prospective ones to invest and develop. To wit, the one-acre parcel on East side of Palms and Sands property was in escrow. The buyer cancelled escrow upon learning that Palms and Sands 55 homes were proposed next door.
There are 19 acres in multiple parcels for sale North of Mirage Cove
9-428
along Peterson Road that would be negatively impacted by the MHP at 28 units/ac.
2) The CVWD has a prohibition on building homes within 300' of the flood channels unless the channel is "lined" along the subject property.
The channel behind the Peterson Road mobile home property is only partially lined. Therefore, housing prohibited in the first 300' along the channel. This property could be used for a 5-acre park bordering the Butler Abrams Trail. This property was intended for Senior housing prior to Redevelopment Agencies being closed down by the State. The remaining 7-acres could be Senior housing like Santa Rosa Villas on the South side, providing approximately 50 homes. Further, if the City and CVWD were to approve housing within the 3 00' prohibition zone, would they be subject to inverse condemnation lawsuits by owners of parcels denied development within the 300' zone?
Summary
Prior to the January 13, 2022 Planning Commission Hearing, notice was not sent to the property owners within 500' of the Planning Department Housing Element proposed parcels. With adequate time for residents' comments, the overwhelming consensus is that Peterson Road MHP and Thunder Road parcels should not be changed to ultra-high-density (28 units or more) and not be included in the "Housing Element" overlay. 13 acres Hwy 111
This parcel across from Motel 6 is surrounded on 3 sides by mountains and HWY 111 frontage on 4th side. 28 units per acre yields 364 units.
Buildings at rear along mountain could be 3 story. Hwy 111 is a major road and has bus transportation within walking distance of parcel.
9-429
This parcel was approved several years ago for a boutique hotel, rental condos and commercial office space. The applicant tried unsuccessfully to find a buyer/hotel developer. The property is for sale now. A hotel and rental condos on the parcel are not financially feasible and are not market attractive for such development. The list price is $8,000,000.00. 364 units are approximately $22,000/unit, a reasonable land cost for low-income housing. The parcel is also within walking distance of large employer ( casino at Date Palm and Hwy 111) and Cathedral City Civic Center.
The acreage along Hwy 111, just East of City Hall and across from Atrium/Palms Cafe is more attractive for a boutique hotel and rental condos.
It satisfies Rancho Mirage's vision for a hotel and mixed-use development. 40 acres adjacent to Rancho Mirage High School
40 acres at 28 units per acre yields 1,120 units. The proposed plan is to have only 9 units per acre. Benefits for low-income, high-density housing:
1) Major road /thoroughfare that connects to Ramon and Dinah Shore for East/West travel.
2) Large employment base at Mission Hills Country Club, Westin Hotel, Westin Timeshare Villas and Del Webb development.
3) Rancho Mirage High School could be used for evening classes, G.E.D. education and recreation. High school age children could walk to school.
City owned land 50 acres
This land is between the Rancho Mirage Dog Park and Home Depot Center. Using only 40 acres with 28 units per acre, yields 1,120 units. 1 O+ acres could be open space, and/or public park.
9-430
Benefits
1) Dinah Shore Drive frontage -major arterial
2) Walking distance to stores and restaurants
3) Walking distance to a large, concentrated employment base. Low- income residents need housing and employment opportunities. The latter is critical to moving up the economic scale and transitioning to non-subsidized housing. This parcel could be a "master-planned community" and a model for low -income housing.
The City Council backed by a large majority of residents stopped CV Link from going through Rancho Mirage and prohibited short-term rentals. The negative impacts on the city and neighborhoods would have been disastrous .
We implore the Council to use the same reasoning and protect the two neighborhoods of Peterson Road/Mirage Cove and Thunder Road.
CC: Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager
Jeremy Gleim, Development Director
9-431
Majna Dukie
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Please see below.
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
Kristie Ramos, CMC
Tuesday, January 18, 2022 12 :2 4 PM
Tyler Fowlkes
Planning
FW: Environmental Assessment Case No. EA21-005/Genera l plan Text Amendment Case No . GPTA21 -005 Housing Element
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone : 760 -324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mai l: [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage , California, 92270
www .Ranc hoMi rageCa .gov
City staff available by phone and ema il
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in -person by appointment only
ranchomirageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday -Saturday from 9 :00 a.m . to 6 :00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-ma il and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the Cal ifornia Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: howard goldstein
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2022 4:47 PM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Subject: Env ironmenta l Assessment Case No. EA21 -00S/General plan Text Amendment Case No . GPTA21-005 Housing Element
CAUTION: This ema il originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Kristie/Planning Commission members;
I have just read the draft Housing Element that is being considered by the Planning Commission and City Council. I am writing this letter to object to adopting this by resolution and amending the General Plan as such.
1 9-432
I am currently building a single family home in the Peterson Ranch neighborhood (36850 Kelly Lane) and am specifically objecting to the change of density to the Rancho Palms Mobile Home Park. The property currently allows 9 dwelling units per acre. The increase with the Overlay Zone, as proposed, will change the allowed density to 28 dwelling units per acre and will make available a density bonus of 50% which can bring the density to 42 units per acre.
The site currently allows 108 dwelling units. If approved, the density would allow 309 units. This triples the currently allowed density. If the bonus is allowed, there could be 518 units on 12.34 acres, an increase of 475%.
I find these increases to be more than excessive and not at all in character with this neighborhood.
I urge the Planning Commission to send the document back to the staff and have then remove the overlay zone and the bonus provision or this parcel from the Housing Element.
Thank you.
Sincerely, Howard Goldstein
2 9-433
Majna Dukie
From: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Sent:
To:
Monday, January 24, 2022 12:37 PM
Tyler Fowlkes
Cc: Planning; Marcus Aleman
Subject: FW: Ranch Mirage Housing Element
Plea se see below .
Kris tie Ramo s , C MC
City Clerk
Phone : 760 -324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail : kristier@RanchoMirageCA .gov
69-825 Highway 111 , Rancho Mirage , California, 92270
www .RanchoMirageCa .gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and email
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in -person by appointment only
ranchomi rage ca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory :
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday -Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, January 23, 2022 11:42 AM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Cc: Ted Weill ; Charles Townsend ; Steve Downs
; Richard W. Kite ; Iris Smotrich
Subject: Ranch Mirage Housing Element
· CAUTION: This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
We are sending this letter as part of our continued opposition to the draft Housing Element in which the Rancho Mobile Home Park and the Thunder Road area will be designated to have 28 units per acre with the developer having the potential to ask for a 50 % Bonus Density (42 units per acre).
1 9-434
When the City acquired the mobile home park, we were told that the Santa Rosa senior housing development would be expanded in a similar fashion. The Santa Rosa project has a density of 7.2 units per acre. We were told to trust the city's stewardship of the property, and we did. Now, with different staff and leadership, we are seeing an almost 400% increase in density. This is not in the best interest of the Petersen Ranch neighborhood and the City of Rancho Mirage.
To make matters worse, the Palm to Sands project is proposing 55 units on 4.5 acres and the Thunder Road neighborhood is proposed at 28 units per acre and the bonus. It feels like the city is dropping a low-income density bomb in our backyards. We are not opposed to low- income housing done right, but not at these densities.
In his presentation to the Planning Commission, the Planning Director stated that the Housing Element, without the bonus, was written to include 2,322 units when only 1,741 is being required by the State of California. This surplus of 581 units is excessive. Removing the Rancho Mirage Mobile Home Park and the Thunder Road area will not adversely affect the requirements of the State. In fact, the entire density can be transferred to the 50 acres the city owns in section 30 and/or the high school site/and ot the 12 vacant acres opposite the Motel 6 on Highway 111. Placing it in the Petersen Ranch neighborhood is not necessary.
Omitted from the Planning Director's presentation was an explanation of SB 166 that clearly states, "The law also prohibits the city from reducing, requiring, or permitting the reduction of the residential density to a lower density ... without making findings." This means that there must be findings, the density will need to be replaced elsewhere, and the Housing Element changed, the General Plan amended, and the zoning changed ... again. Why go through this when we can avoid this now by eliminating the overlay zone from the Rancho Mobile Home Park and the Thunder Road neighborhoods.
We do not believe that the city has looked carefully at other options for meeting the state's housing requirements. There are other options that must be addressed. As you understand, once this change is in writing and adopted, it is difficult to change. The overlay designation becomes right of zone.
Please review the section of the study that refers to "Public Participation." You will note that there was not public participation. The attendees at the presentations were representatives from housing groups and housing developers. Although the city satisfied the legal requirements to notice the public, it was ineffective. The public has now become aware of the change in the Housing Element and is commenting. Listen to them. Send the Housing Element back to staff. Have them work with the public on alternatives and let's get this right. We are here to work with you. There is no urgency to act on this now. Thank you. 2 9-435
Mike and Lynn Fontana
70411 Desert Cove
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
760-567-2054
3 9-436
Majna Dukie
From: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Sent:
To:
Monday, January 24, 2022 12 :34 PM
Tyler Fowlkes
Cc: Planning; Marcus Aleman
Subject: FW: Raquel Bitton Prolman/Our property is located at 38785 and 38775 Peterson Road, , Rancho Mirage Ca 92270
Attachments: Council Letter 1-20-22 .docx .pdf
Please see below/attached.
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone : 760 -324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail: [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage , California, 92270
www.RanchoMirageCa.gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and email
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in-person by appointment only
ranchomirageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday -Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mai l and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: Raquel Bitton
Sent: Saturday, January 22, 2022 3:03 PM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Subject: Raquel Bitton Prolman/Our property is lo cated at 38785 and 38775 Peterson Road,, Rancho Mirage Ca 92270 CAUTION: This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Sir or Madam,
I agree wit the attached .
Raquel Bitton Prolman .
Our property is located at 38785 and 38775 Peterson Road, , Rancho Mirage Ca 92270 1 9-437
Warmly,
Raquel Bitton Pro lm an
2 9-438
Honorable Mayor Ted Weill
Council Members:
Steve Downs
Richard Kite
Iris Smotrich
Charles Townsend
Dear Madam and Sirs:
1-20 -22
Please consider the following for the Housing Element. I oppose including the Thunder Road parcels ( above the Shell station at Hwy 111 and Peterson Road) and the former mobile home park on Peterson Road. This letter includes information the Planning Department and Planning Commission did not have and was not included in the Planning Commission Hearing on January 13, 2022.
The below states reasons and facts why three parcels noted should be in Housing Element overlay. Rancho Mirage quota (1,741 units) for low-income housing can easily be met by the three parcels proposed, yielding over 2,600 units.
Low-income housing is not the objection. It is the locations with densities that are opposed.
1) The problems, negative impacts and objections to the Palms and Sands proposed 5 5 homes on 4 ½ acres carry over to Thunder Road and Peterson Road parcels. The negative impacts of high-density development in a low-density residential neighborhood include, decisions of existing property owners and prospective ones to invest and develop. To wit, the one-acre parcel on East side of Palms and Sands property was in escrow. The buyer cancelled escrow upon learning that Palms and Sands 55 homes were proposed next door.
There are 19 acres in multiple parcels for sale North of Mirage Cove
9-439
along Peterson Road that would be negatively impacted by the MHP at 28 units/ac.
2) The CVWD has a prohibition on building homes within 300' of the flood channels unless the channel is "lined" along the subject property.
The channel behind the Peterson Road mobile home property is only partially lined. Therefore, housing prohibited in the first 3 00' along the channel. This property could be used for a 5-acre park bordering the Butler Abrams Trail. This property was intended for Senior housing prior to Redevelopment Agencies being closed down by the State. The remaining 7-acres could be Senior housing like Santa Rosa Villas on the South side, providing approximately 50 homes. Further, if the City and CVWD were to approve housing within the 300' prohibition zone, would they be subject to inverse condemnation lawsuits by owners of parcels denied development within the 300' zone?
Summary
Prior to the January 13, 2022 Planning Commission Hearing, notice was not sent to the property owners within 500' of the Planning Department Housing Element proposed parcels. With adequate time for residents' comments, the overwhelming consensus is that Peterson Road MHP and Thunder Road parcels should not be changed to ultra-high-density (28 units or more) and not be included in the "Housing Element" overlay. 13 acres Hwy 111
This parcel across from Motel 6 is surrounded on 3 sides by mountains and HWY 111 frontage on 4 th side. 28 units per acre yields 364 units.
Buildings at rear along mountain could be 3 story. Hwy 111 is a major road and has bus transportation within walking distance of parcel.
9-440
This parcel was approved several years ago for a boutique hotel, rental condos and commercial office space. The applicant tried unsuccessfully to find a buyer/hotel developer. The property is for sale now. A hotel and rental condos on the parcel are not financially feasible and are not market attractive for such development. The list price is $8,000,000.00. 364 units are approximately $22,000 /unit, a reasonable land cost for low-income housing. The parcel is also within walking distance of large employer ( casino at Date Palm and Hwy 111) and Cathedral City Civic Center.
The acreage along Hwy 111, just East of City Hall and across from Atrium/Palms Cafe is more attractive for a boutique hotel and rental condos.
It satisfies Rancho Mirage's vision for a hotel and mixed-use development. 40 acres adjacent to Rancho Mirage High School
40 acres at 28 units per acre yields 1,120 units. The proposed plan is to have only 9 units per acre. Benefits for low-income, high-density housing:
1) Major road /thoroughfare that connects to Ramon and Dinah Shore for East/West travel.
2) Large employment base at Mission Hills Country Club, Westin Hotel, Westin Timeshare Villas and Del Webb development.
3) Rancho Mirage High School could be used for evening classes, G.E.D. education and recreation. High school age children could walk to school.
City owned land 50 acres
This land is between the Rancho Mirage Dog Park and Home Depot Center. Using only 40 acres with 28 units per acre, yields 1,120 units. 1 O+ acres could be open space, and/or public park.
9-441
Benefits
1) Dinah Shore Drive frontage -major arterial
2) Walking distance to stores and restaurants
3) Walking distance to a large, concentrated employment base. Low- income residents need housing and employment opportunities. The latter is critical to moving up the economic scale and transitioning to non-subsidized housing. This parcel could be a "master-planned community" and a model for low-income housing.
The City Council backed by a large majority of residents stopped CV Link from going through Rancho Mirage and prohibited short-term rentals. The negative impacts on the city and neighborhoods would have been disastrous.
We implore the Council to use the same reasoning and protect the two neighborhoods of Peterson Road/Mirage Cove and Thunder Road.
CC: Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager
Jeremy Gleim, Development Director
9-442
Majna Dukie
From: Kristie Ramos, CM C
Sent:
To:
W ednesday, January 26, 2022 1 :26 PM
Marcus Aleman
Cc: Planning; Tyler Fowlkes
Subject: FW: Counci l Letter
Attachments: Counci l Letter 1-20-22.docx.pdf
Please see below/attached.
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City C lerk
Phone: 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail: [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, Ca liforni a, 92270
www.RanchoMirageCa.gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff avai labl e by phone and emai l
Monday-Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in-person by appointment only
ranchomirageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go " Services Only
Tuesday-Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or a ll of the content of this e-mai l and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the Ca liforni a Public Records Act (Government Code sect ion 6250, et seq.) From: Rosemarie Pirri
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 6:13 PM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Subject: Counci l Letter
CAUTION: This emai l originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
RosemariePirri
78360 Prairie Flower Drive
Palm Desert, Ca
1 9-443
I do not live in Rancho Mirage, but I have friends that live in Rancho Mirage and I support their cause.
I believe and agree with the attached letter
to the council.
2 9-444
Honorable Mayor Ted Weill
Council Members:
Steve Downs
Richard Kite
Iris Smotrich
Charles Townsend
Dear Madam and Sirs:
1-20-22
Please consider the following for the Housing Element. I oppose including the Thunder Road parcels ( above the Shell station at Hwy 111 and Peterson Road) and the former mobile home park on Peterson Road. This letter includes information the Planning Department and Planning Commission did not have and was not included in the Planning Commission Hearing on January 13, 2022.
The below states reasons and facts why three parcels noted should be in Housing Element overlay. Rancho Mirage quota (1,741 units) for low-income housing can easily be met by the three parcels proposed, yielding over 2,600 units.
Low-income housing is not the objection. It is the locations with densities that are opposed.
1) The problems, negative impacts and objections to the Palms and Sands proposed 5 5 homes on 4 ½ acres carry over to Thunder Road and Peterson Road parcels. The negative impacts of high-density development in a low-density residential neighborhood include, decisions of existing property owners and prospective ones to invest and develop. To wit, the one-acre parcel on East side of Palms and Sands property was in escrow. The buyer cancelled escrow upon learning that Palms and Sands 55 homes were proposed next door.
There are 19 acres in multiple parcels for sale North of Mirage Cove
9-445
along Peterson Road that would be negatively impacted by the MHP at 28 units /ac.
2) The CVWD has a prohibition on building homes within 300' of the flood channels unless the channel is "lined" along the subject property.
The channel behind the Peterson Road mobile home property is only partially lined. Therefore, housing prohibited in the first 3 00' along the channel. This property could be used for a 5-acre park bordering the Butler Abrams Trail. This property was intended for Senior housing prior to Redevelopment Agencies being closed down by the State. The remaining 7-acres could be Senior housing like Santa Rosa Villas on the South side, providing approximately 50 homes. Further, if the City and CVWD were to approve housing within the 300' prohibition zone, would they be subject to inverse condemnation lawsuits by owners of parcels denied development within the 300' zone?
Summary
Prior to the January 13, 2022 Planning Commission Hearing, notice was not sent to the property owners within 500' of the Planning Department Housing Element proposed parcels. With adequate time for residents' comments, the overwhelming consensus is that Peterson Road MHP and Thunder Road parcels should not be changed to ultra-high-density (28 units or more) and not be included in the "Housing Element" overlay. 13 acres Hwy 111
This parcel across from Motel 6 is surrounded on 3 sides by mountains and HWY 111 frontage on 4th side. 28 units per acre yields 364 units.
Buildings at rear along mountain could be 3 story. Hwy 111 is a major road and has bus transportation within walking distance of parcel.
9-446
This parcel was approved several years ago for a boutique hotel, rental condos and commercial office space. The applicant tried unsuccessfully to find a buyer/hotel developer. The property is for sale now. A hotel and rental condos on the parcel are not financially feasible and are not market attractive for such development. The list price is $8,000,000.00. 364 units are approximately $22,000/unit, a reasonable land cost for low-income housing. The parcel is also within walking distance of large employer ( casino at Date Palm and Hwy 111) and Cathedral City Civic Center.
The acreage along Hwy 111, just East of City Hall and across from Atrium/Palms Cafe is more attractive for a boutique hotel and rental condos.
It satisfies Rancho Mirage's vision for a hotel and mixed-use development. 40 acres adjacent to Rancho Mirage High School
40 acres at 28 units per acre yields 1,120 units. The proposed plan is to have only 9 units per acre. Benefits for low-income, high-density housing:
1) Major road /thoroughfare that connects to Ramon and Dinah Shore for East/West travel.
2) Large employment base at Mission Hills Country Club, Westin Hotel, Westin Timeshare Villas and Del Webb development.
3) Rancho Mirage High School could be used for evening classes, G.E.D. education and recreation. High school age children could walk to school.
City owned land 50 acres
This land is between the Rancho Mirage Dog Park and Home Depot Center. Using only 40 acres with 28 units per acre, yields 1,120 units. 1 O+ acres could be open space, and /or public park.
9-447
Benefits
1) Dinah Shore Drive frontage -major arterial
2) Walking distance to stores and restaurants
3) Walking distance to a large, concentrated employment base. Low- income residents need housing and employment opportunities. The latter is critical to moving up the economic scale and transitioning to non-subsidized housing. This parcel could be a "master-planned community" and a model for low-income housing .
The City Council backed by a large majority of residents stopped CV Link from going through Rancho Mirage and prohibited short-term rentals. The negative impacts on the city and neighborhoods would have been disastrous.
We implore the Council to use .the same reasoning and protect the two neighborhoods of Peterson Road/Mirage Cove and Thunder Road.
CC: Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager
Jeremy Gleim, Development Director
9-448
Majna Dukie
From: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Sent:
To:
Wednesday, January 26, 2022 1 :26 PM
Marcus Aleman
Cc: Planning; Tyler Fowlkes
Subject:
Attachments:
FW: rancho mirage Council Letter
Council Letter 1-20-22.docx.pdf
Please see below/attached.
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone : 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail : kristier@RanchoMirageCA .gov
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
www. RanchoM irageCa .gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and email
Monday-Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in-person by appointment only
ranchom irageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday-Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: Debbie Kroodsma
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 6:22 PM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Subject: rancho mirage Council Letter
CAUTION : This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO .NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Deborah Kroodsma
82386 Wagon Rd
Indio, Ca.
92203
1 9-449
As a local Desert resident but do not live in Rancho Mirage. I am extremely concerned in regards to the below letter. I have friends who live in Rancho Mirage and concerned for them. There are at least three other locations better suited for high density low income housing then this location.
Respectfully
Debbie Kroodsma
2 9-450
Honorable Mayor Ted Weill
Council Members:
Steve Downs
Richard Kite
Iris Smotrich
Charles Townsend
Dear Madam and Sirs:
1-20-22
Please consider the following for the Housing Element. I oppose including the Thunder Road parcels ( above the Shell station at Hwy 111 and Peterson Road) and the former mobile home park on Peterson Road. This letter includes information the Planning Department and Planning Commission did not have and was not included in the Planning Commission Hearing on January 13, 2022.
The below states reasons and facts why three parcels noted should be in Housing Element overlay. Rancho Mirage quota (1,741 units) for low-income housing can easily be met by the three parcels proposed, yielding over 2,600 units.
Low-income housing is not the objection. It is the locations with densities that are opposed.
1) The problems, negative impacts and objections to the Palms and Sands proposed 5 5 homes on 4 ½ acres carry over to Thunder Road and Peterson Road parcels. The negative impacts of high-density development in a low-density residential neighborhood include, decisions of existing property owners and prospective ones to invest and develop. To wit, the one-acre parcel on East side of Palms and Sands property was in escrow. The buyer cancelled escrow upon learning that Palms and Sands 55 homes were proposed next door.
There are 19 acres in multiple parcels for sale North of Mirage Cove
9-451
along Peterson Road that would be negatively impacted by the MHP at 28 units/ac.
2) The CVWD has a prohibition on building homes within 300' of the flood channels unless the channel is "lined" along the subject property.
The channel behind the Peterson Road mobile home property is only partially lined. Therefore, housing prohibited in the first 3 00' along the channel. This property could be used for a 5-acre park bordering the Butler Abrams Trail. This property was intended for Senior housing prior to Redevelopment Agencies being closed down by the State. The remaining 7-acres could be Senior housing like Santa Rosa Villas on the South side, providing approximately 50 homes. Further, if the City and CVWD were to approve housing within the 300' prohibition zone, would they be subject to inverse condemnation lawsuits by owners of parcels denied development within the 300' zone?
Summary
Prior to the January 13, 2022 Planning Commission Hearing, notice was not sent to the property owners within 500' of the Planning Department Housing Element proposed parcels. With adequate time for residents' comments, the overwhelming consensus is that Peterson Road MHP and Thunder Road parcels should not be changed to ultra-high-density (28 units or more) and not be included in the "Housing Element" overlay. 13 acres Hwy 111
This parcel across from Motel 6 is surrounded on 3 sides by mountains and HWY 111 frontage on 4th side. 28 units per acre yields 364 units.
Buildings at rear along mountain could be 3 story. Hwy 111 is a major road and has bus transportation within walking distance of parcel.
9-452
This parcel was approved several years ago for a boutique hotel, rental condos and commercial office space. The applicant tried unsuccessfully to find a buyer/hotel developer. The property is for sale now. A hotel and rental condos on the parcel are not financially feasible and are not market attractive for such development. The list price is $8,000,000.00. 364 units are approximately $22,000/unit, a reasonable land cost for low-income housing. The parcel is also within walking distance of large employer ( casino at Date Palm and Hwy 111) and Cathedral City Civic Center.
The acreage along Hwy 111, just East of City Hall and across from Atrium/Palms Cafe is more attractive for a boutique hotel and rental condos.
It satisfies Rancho Mirage's vision for a hotel and mixed-use development. 40 acres adjacent to Rancho Mirage High School
40 acres at 28 units per acre yields 1,120 units. The proposed plan is to have only 9 units per acre. Benefits for low-income, high-density housing:
1) Major road /thoroughfare that connects to Ramon and Dinah Shore for East/West travel.
2) Large employment base at Mission Hills Country Club, Westin Hotel, Westin Timeshare Villas and Del Webb development.
3) Rancho Mirage High School could be used for evening classes, G.E.D. education and recreation. High school age children could walk to school.
City owned land 50 acres
This land is between the Rancho Mirage Dog Park and Home Depot Center. Using only 40 acres with 28 units per acre, yields 1,120 units. 10+ acres could be open space, and/or public park.
9-453
Benefits
1) Dinah Shore Drive frontage -major arterial
2) Walking distance to stores and restaurants
3) Walking distance to a large, concentrated employment base. Low- income residents need housing and employment opportunities. The latter is critical to moving up the economic scale and transitioning to non-subsidized housing. This parcel could be a "master-planned community" and a model for low-income housing.
The City Council backed by a large majority of residents stopped CV Link from going through Rancho Mirage and prohibited short-term rentals. The negative impacts on the city and neighborhoods would have been disastrous.
We implore the Council to use the same reasoning and protect the two neighborhoods of Peterson Road/Mirage Cove and Thunder Road.
CC: Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager
Jeremy Gleim, Development Director
9-454
Majna Dukie
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Please see below.
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
Kristie Ramos, CMC
Wednesday, January 26, 2022 1 :28 PM
Marcus Aleman
Planning; Tyler Fowlkes
FW: Zoning changes
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone: 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail : [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
www .Ra nchoMirageCa .gov
City staff available by phone and email
Monday-Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m .
Available for in-person by appointment only
ranchomirageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Services Only
Tuesday-Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: jack swenson
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 7:53 AM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Subject: Zoning changes
CAUTION: This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Mayor Ted Weill
Council members:
Steve Downs
Richard Kite
Iris Smotrich
Charles Townsend
I oppose the proposed changes to the Peterson Road former mobile home park to high density housing . 1 9-455
I believe such a high density property will have a significant negative impact on the neighborhood and would reduce the likelihood of the undeveloped 1 acre minimum vacant land be developed in the future. Lately, we have seen some of these lots being used for high quality homes and have the potential for the neighborhood to look more like Clancy Lane. It would be a shame if we move in the other direction.
It seems to me that there are several other properties in the city that could be far more appropriate for your State requirements.
Please consider these other areas that are a better fit .
Sincerely,
Jack Swenson
38590 Peterson Rd. Rancho Mirage, CA
2 9-456
Majna Dukie
From: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Sent:
To:
Wednesday, January 26, 2022 1 :31 PM
Marcus Aleman
Cc: Planning; Tyler Fowlkes
Subject: FW: NO ULTRA-HIGH-DENSITY "HOU SING ELEMENT" FOR PETERSON, MIRAGE CO V E
OR THUNDER ROAD
Please see below.
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone: 760-324 -4511 Ext. 488
E-mail: [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
www .RanchoMirageCa .gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and email
Monday-Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in -person by appointment only
ranchomirageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go " Serv ic es On ly
Tuesday-Saturday from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: LIS VVSl
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 9:30 AM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC ; Murray Bryant
Subject: NO ULTRA-HIGH-DENSITY "HOUSING ELEMENT" FOR PETERSON, MIRAGE COVE OR THUNDER ROAD CAUTION: This emai l originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Honorable Mayor Ted Weill
Council Members:
Steve Downs
Richard Kite
Iris Smotrich
Charles Townsend
1 9-457
January 26, 2022
Dear Madam and Sirs:
Please consider the following for the Housing Element. I oppose including the Thunder Road parcels (above the Shell station at Hwy 111 and Peterson Road) and the former mobile home park on Peterson Road. This letter includes information the Planning Department and Planning Commission did not have and was not included in the Planning Commission Hearing on January 13, 2022.
The below states reasons and facts why three parcels noted should be in Housing Element overlay. Rancho Mirage quota (1,741 units) for low-income housing can easily be met by the three parcels proposed, yielding over 2 ,600 units.
Low-income housing is not the objection. It is the locations with densities that are opposed.
1) The problems, negative impacts and objections to the Palms and Sands proposed 55 homes on 4 ½ acres carry over to Thunder Road and Peterson Road parcels. The negative impacts of high-density development in a low-density residential neighborhood include, decisions of existing property owners and prospective ones to invest and develop. To wit, the one-acre parcel on East side of Palms and Sands property was in escrow. The buyer cancelled escrow upon learning that Palms and Sands 55 homes were proposed next door.
There are 19 acres in multiple parcels for sale North of Mirage Cove along Peterson Road that would be negatively impacted by the MHP at 28 units/ac.
2) The CVWD has a prohibition on building homes within 300' of the flood channels unless the channel is "lined" along the subject property.
The channel behind the Peterson Road mobile home property is only partially lined. Therefore, housing prohibited in the first 300' along the channel. This property could be used for a 5-acre park bordering the Butler Abrams Trail. This property was intended for Senior housing prior to Redevelopment Agencies being closed down by the State. The remaining 7-acres could be Senior housing like Santa Rosa Villas on the South side, providing approximately 50 homes. Further, if the City and CVWD were to approve housing within the 300' prohibition zone, would they be subject to inverse condemnation lawsuits by owners of parcels denied development within the 300' zone?
Summary
Prior to the January 13, 2022 Planning Commission Hearing, notice was not sent to the property owners within 500' of the Planning Department Housing Element proposed parcels. With adequate time for residents' comments, the overwhelming consensus is that Peterson Road MHP and Thunder Road parcels should not be changed to ultra-high-density (28 units or more) and not be included in the "Housing Element" overlay. 2 9-458
13 acres Hwy 111
This parcel across from Motel 6 is surrounded on 3 sides by mountains and HWY 111 frontage on 4th side . 28 units per acre yields 364 units .
Buildings at rear along mountain could be 3 story . Hwy 111 is a major road and has bus transportation within walking distance of parcel.
This parcel was approved several years ago for a boutique hotel, rental condos and commercial office space. The applicant tried unsuccessfully to find a buyer/hotel developer. The property is for sale now. A hotel and rental condos on the parcel are not financially feasible and are not market attractive for such development. The list price is $8,000,000.00. 364 units are approximately $22,000/unit, a reasonable land cost for low-income housing. The parcel is also within walking distance of large employer ( casino at Date Palm and Hwy 111) and Cathedral City Civic Center.
The acreage along Hwy 111, just East of City Hall and across from Atrium/Palms Cafe is more attractive for a boutique hotel and rental condos .
It satisfies Rancho Mirage's vision for a hotel and mixed-use development. 40 acres adjacent to Rancho Mirage High School
40 acres at 28 units per acre yields 1,120 units. The proposed plan is to have only 9 units per acre. Benefits for low-income, high-density housing:
1) Major road/thoroughfare that connects to Ramon and Dinah Shore for East/West travel.
2) Large employment base at Mission Hills Country Club, Westin Hotel, Westin Timeshare Villas and Del Webb development.
3) Rancho Mirage High School could be used for evening classes, G.E.D. education and recreation. High school age children could walk to school.
City owned land 50 acres
This land is between the Rancho Mirage Dog Park and Home Depot Center. Using only 40 acres with 28 units per acre, yields 1,120 units. 10+ acres could be open space, and/or public park.
Benefits
1) Dinah Shore Drive frontage -major arterial
2) Walking distance to stores and restaurants
3) Walking distance to a large, concentrated employment base. Low[l ]income residents need housing and employment opportunities.
The latter is critical to moving up the economic scale and transitioning to non-subsidized housing. This parcel could be a "master-planned community" and a model for low-income housing.
The City Council backed by a large majority of residents stopped CV Link 3 9-459
from going through Rancho Mirage and prohibited short-term rentals. The negative impacts on the city and neighborhoods would have been disastrous.
We implore the Council to use the same reasoning and protect the two neighborhoods of Peterson Road/Mirage Cove and Thunder Road.
CC: Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager
Jeremy Gleim, Development Director
Lisa McFadden
38900 Kelley Lane
Rancho Mirage, CA. 92270
760-992-6500
4 9-460
Majna Dukie
From: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Sent:
To:
Wednesday, January 26, 2022 1 :33 PM
Marcus Aleman
Cc : Planning; Tyler Fowlkes
Subject:
Attachments:
FW: City council hearing 2/3/22
Council Letter 1-20 -22 .docx.pdf
Please see below/attached.
Kri s ti e Ramo s , C MC
City Clerk
Phone : 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail : [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111 , Rancho Mirage , California, 92270
www.RanchoMirageCa.gov
Rancho Mirage City Hall:
City staff available by phone and email
Monday -Friday from 9:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.
Available for in -person by appointment only
ranchomirageca.gov
Rancho Mirage Library & Observatory:
"Library to Go" Service s Only
Tuesday -Saturday from 9 :00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m
ranchomiragelibrary.org
TRANSPAR ENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq .) From: Francene Fisher
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 11:39 AM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC
Subj ect: RE: City council hearing 2/3/22
CAUTION: This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. ;.,· i To Whom It May Concern,
I am a resident of Rancho Mirage-35 Pine Valley Drive. I completely agree with the attached regarding the location of the low-income housing. As a resident, I ask that you carefully consider locating this in locations other that the Peterson Road MHP and Thunder Road parcels. I appreciate your consideration
1 9-461
Sincerely,
Francene Fisher
2 9-462
Honorable Mayor Ted Weill
Council Members:
Steve Downs
Richard Kite
Iris Smotrich
Charles Townsend
Dear Madam and Sirs:
1-20-22
Please consider the following for the Housing Element. I oppose including the Thunder Road parcels ( above the Shell station at Hwy 111 and Peterson Road) and the former mobile home park on Peterson Road. This letter includes information the Planning Department and Planning Commission did not have and was not included in the Planning Commission Hearing on January 13, 2022.
The below states reasons and facts why three parcels noted should be in Housing Element overlay. Rancho Mirage quota (1,741 units) for low-income housing can easily be met by the three parcels proposed, yielding over 2,600 units.
Low-income housing is not the objection. It is the locations with densities that are opposed.
1) The problems, negative impacts and objections to the Palms and Sands proposed 5 5 homes on 4 ½ acres carry over to Thunder Road and Peterson Road parcels. The negative impacts of high-density development in a low-density residential neighborhood include, decisions of existing property owners and prospective ones to invest and develop. To wit, the one-acre parcel on East side of Palms and Sands property was in escrow. The buyer cancelled escrow upon learning that Palms and Sands 55 homes were proposed next door.
There are 19 acres in multiple parcels for sale North of Mirage Cove
9-463
along Peterson Road that would be negatively impacted by the MHP at 28 units/ac.
2) The CVWD has a prohibition on building homes within 300' of the flood channels unless the channel is "lined" along the subject property.
The channel behind the Peterson Road mobile home property is only partially lined. Therefore, housing prohibited in the first 300' along the channel. This property could be used for a 5-acre park bordering the Butler Abrams Trail. This property was intended for Senior housing prior to Redevelopment Agencies being closed down by the State. The remaining 7-acres could be Senior housing like Santa Rosa Villas on the South side, providing approximately 50 homes. Further, if the City and CVWD were to approve housing within the 300' prohibition zone, would they be subject to inverse condemnation lawsuits by owners of parcels denied development within the 300' zone?
Summary
Prior to the January 13, 2022 Planning Commission Hearing, notice was not sent to the property owners within 500' of the Planning Department Housing Element proposed parcels. With adequate time for residents' comments, the overwhelming consensus is that Peterson Road MHP and Thunder Road parcels should not be changed to ultra-high-density (28 units or more) and not be included in the "Housing Element" overlay. 13 acres Hwy 111
This parcel across from Motel 6 is surrounded on 3 sides by mountains and HWY 111 frontage on 4th side. 28 units per acre yields 364 units.
Buildings at rear along mountain could be 3 story. Hwy 111 is a major road and has bus transportation within walking distance of parcel.
9-464
This parcel was approved several years ago for a boutique hotel, rental condos and commercial office space. The applicant tried unsuccessfully to find a buyer/hotel developer. The property is for sale now. A hotel and rental condos on the parcel are not financially feasible and are not market attractive for such development. The list price is $8,000,000.00. 364 units are approximately $22,000/unit, a reasonable land cost for low-income housing. The parcel is also within walking distance of large employer ( casino at Date Palm and Hwy 111) and Cathedral City Civic Center.
The acreage along Hwy 111, just East of City Hall and across from Atrium/Palms Cafe is more attractive for a boutique hotel and rental condos.
It satisfies Rancho Mirage's vision for a hotel and mixed-use development. 40 acres adjacent to Rancho Mirage High School
40 acres at 28 units per acre yields 1,120 units. The proposed plan is to have only 9 units per acre. Benefits for low-income, high-density housing:
1) Major road/thoroughfare that connects to Ramon and Dinah Shore for East/West travel.
2) Large employment base at Mission Hills Country Club, Westin Hotel, Westin Timeshare Villas and Del Webb development.
3) Rancho Mirage High School could be used for evening classes, G.E.D. education and recreation. High school age children could walk to school.
City owned land 50 acres
This land is between the Rancho Mirage Dog Park and Home Depot Center. Using only 40 acres with 28 units per acre, yields 1,120 units. 10+ acres could be open space, and/or public park.
9-465
Benefits
1) Dinah Shore Drive frontage -major arterial
2) Walking distance to stores and restaurants
3) Walking distance to a large, concentrated employment base. Low- income residents need housing and employment opportunities. The latter is critical to moving up the economic scale and transitioning to non-subsidized housing. This parcel could be a "master-planned community" and a model for low-income housing.
The City Council backed by a large majority of residents stopped CV Link from going through Rancho Mirage and prohibited short-term rentals. The negative impacts on the city and neighborhoods would have been disastrous.
We implore the Council to use the same reasoning and protect the two neighborhoods of Peterson Road/Mirage Cove and Thunder Road.
CC: Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager
Jeremy Gleim, Development Director