Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Rancho Mirage City Council
September 1, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
September 1, 2022
Body
Rancho Mirage City Council
Pages
76
Original file
2.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on portal.laserfiche.com. That file is the official record.

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
152270

25.85 28000000
8000
103156
138.56
10132000
7618
CHECK
07/28/2022
NAME
BADGE
-
D.

MENDOZA

SUPPLIES
CHECK
229175
TOTAL
:
08122022
229176
TOTAL
:
07/27/2022
08122022
RPR

BLOWER/CHAINSAW
-

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

MAINT/ELEC
CHECK
229177
TOTAL:

Ip
11 apcshdsb
NET
3,031.20 3,031.20
100
.00
100
.00

25.85 25.85 138.56 138.56
229178
08/12/2022
PRTD
Invoice:

SH0000041500
147

RIVERSIDE
COUNTY

SHERIFFS
DEPT
SH0000041500
06/30/2022
08122022
1,358
.74
Invoice:

SH0000041589
229179
08/12/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
49951
229180
08/12/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
5093072822
FUEL

CHARGES
5/25/22-6/24/22
1,358.74
10141000
7623

VEHICLE
FUEL

RIVERSIDE
COUNTY

SHERIFFS
DEPT
SH0000041589
06/30/2022
08122022
838
,4

81.30 2847
NAUL
RIVERA
LAW

ENFORCEMENT
BP#l2
06/02/2022
-
06 /30/2022
838,481.30
10141000
7404

SHERIFF

SERVICES
850.00
201
49951
7612
CHECK
2291
78 TOTAL:
839,840.04
07/25/2022
08122022
850.00

INSTALL

TREE/IRRIGATION
-
MEDIAN
(PAXTON/LIBRARY)

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229179
TOTAL:
850.00
61 SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
5093072822
08/02/2022
08122022
2,236.63

SERVICE
PE
7/28/22
(ACCT
#700485325093)
2,236
.63
21500500
7603

ELECTRICITY

SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
4604073122
08 /03/2022
08122022

71. 73
6-203
~IJTIW 08/11/2022
11 :25
elijaha
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
Invoice:
4604073122
OTY()(-~fJIMG~
~
~ INVOICE

71.73 201
7603
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
~\,\\,
CHECK
RUN

SERVICE
PE
7/30/22
(ACC
T
#700484394604)

ELECTRICITY

SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
0086073122
08/03/2022
08122022
Invoice:
0086073122

SERVICE
PE
7/31/22
(ACCT#
700052520086)
1,418.17
10132000
7603

ELECTRICIT

Y CHECK
229180
TOTAL
:
229181
08/12/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
23323
2271
STREAM
KIM
HICKS
WRAGE
&

ALFARO,
23323
2,250.00
10151000
7400
06/30/2022
08122022
LEGAL
FEES
-
RANCHO
COVE
PE
6/18/2022

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
229182
08/12/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
1027
1184
SUSAN
STEIN
229183
08/12/2022
PRTD
2824

T-MOBILE
USA
INC
Invoice:
9497782289

T-MOBILE
USA
INC
Invoice:
9497782667

T-MOBILE
USA
INC
Invoice
:
9498913537
CHECK
229181
TOTAL:
1027
01/31/2018
08122022

HONORARIUM
2/14/18
S.

STEIN
1,000.00
E
LB
18ADLEC-HONORARIUM-
24281000
7910

FOUNDATION
-

PROGRAMS
CHECK
229182
TOTAL:
9497782289
06/30/2022
08122022
RIV
CO

SHERIFF
PE
6/22/22
125.00
10141000
7400

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
9497782667
06/30/2022
08122022
RIV
CO

SHERIFF
PE
6/22/22
125.00
10141000
7400

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
9498913537
06/30/2022
08122022
RIV
CO

SHERIFF
PE
6/17/22

25.00 10141000
7400

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK
229183
TOTAL:
229184
08/12/2022
PRTD
1990
TOYOTA
OF
THE
DESERT
TOCS820234
07/28/2022
08122022
Invoice:

TOCS820234
SMOG
-
FD05
FIRE

INSPECT
VER
7/28/22
229185
08/12/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
152368307
509
ULINE,
INC

85.00 21500000
7624

VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE
152368307
642.35
10172000
749
4 CHECK
229184
TOTAL:
08/08/2022
20230062
08122022
PALLET

RACKS/SHELVING
-

AMPHITHEATER

AMPHITHEATER

PROGRAMMING
IP
12 apcshdsb
NET
1,418.17 3,726
.53
2,250.00 2,250.00 1,000.00 1,000.00
125.00 125.00 25.00 275
.00

85.00 85
.00
642.35
6-204
08/11/2022
11:25
elijaha
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
Invoice:
152223141
Invoice:
152409320
229186
08/12/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
6607724
ULINE
,
INC
ULINE
,
INC
480
US
BANK
OTY
Of-~
l'l<AG
~
ts:
,'.'.) INVOICE 152223141
2,298
.19
10172000
7494
152409320
167
.18
10172000
7494
2,900.00
276
6607724
7440
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
~\\\\\
CHECK
RUN
08/04/2022
20230062
08122022
PALLET
RACKS
/SHELVING
-

AMPHITHEATER

AMPHITHEATER

PROGRAMMING
08 /09/2022
20230062
08122022
PALLET
RACKS
/SHELVING
-

AMPHITHEATER

AMPHITHEATER

PROGRAMMING
CHECK
229185
TOTAL:
07/25/2022
08122022
ADMIN
&

INCIDENTAL
FEES
PE
6/30/23
BOND

SERVICING
CHECK
229186
TOTAL:

Ip
13 apcshdsb
NET
2,298.19
167.18
3,107
.72
2,900
.00
2,900.00
229187
08 /12
/2022
PRTD
1622
VANCE

CORPORATION
Invoice:
2022-02
.02
2022-02.02
06 /30
/2022
20220207
0812202
2 29,954.64
229188
08/12/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
002-26845
Invoice
:
002-26846
229189
08/12/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
3335
CP
21-372:

CRACK

SEALING

PROJECT
PE
6/30/22
31 ,531.20
236
-1,576.56
101
9525
RUBBZD
CRCK
SEALNG
STRTS
2050

RETENTION

PAYABLE
776

WILLDAN

ENGINEERING
002-26845
1,757.50
10122000
7400

WILLDAN

ENGINEERING
002-26846
8,740.00
10122000
7400
363
YELLOW
CAB
OF
THE
DESERT
3335
108.50
28600000
7480
CHECK
229187
TOTAL:
06/30/2022
20220114
08122022

INSPECTION

SERVICES
PE
6/24/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
06 /30/2022
20220114
08122022
PULTE

INSPECTION

SERVICES
PE
6/30/22

PROFESSIONAL
/TECHNICAL
CHECK
229188
TOTAL
:
07 /31/2022
08122022
CAB

VOUCHER

PROGRAM
PE
7/31
/22

TRANSPORTATION

PROGRAM
CHECK
229189
TOTAL:
29,954.64 1,757.50 8,740
.00
10,497
.50
108
.50
108.50
6-205
~l 08/11/2022
11:25
elijaha
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
OTV
~~~
~
,!'.l
NUMBER
OF
CHECKS
70 TOTAL

PRINTED
CHECKS
TOTAL
EFT'S
COUNT
52 18
~\~\\
***
CASH

ACCOUNT
TOTAL***
AMOUNT
1,065,973.98
187,617.11 ***
GRAND
TOTAL***
IP
14 apcshdsb
1,253,591.09 1,253,591.09
6-206
08/18/2022
11:
31 anac
OTY
Of~rrl<AG~
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
4758
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50438
188
JONI
D
ALMY
INVOICE 50438
2,125.56
10151000
7200
4759
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50441
2110
ANNIE

SANFILLIPPO
50441
4760
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50437
4761
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50429
4762
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
511408
Invoice:
511409
Invoice:
512060
106
DAVID

BARRETT
104
HECTOR
BARRON
333
BECK
OIL
INC
BECK
OIL
INC
BECK
OIL
INC
1,233.76
10151000
7200
50437
1,607.54
10151000
7200
50429
744
.17
10151000
7200
511408
544.39
10132000
7623

73.70 10133000
7623
128.60
21800000
7623

94.54 10131000
7623
127.08
10132000
7623
164
.18
10141000
7623
247.54
10122000
7623
370
.05
10123000
7623
511409
481.15
10132000
7623
1,103.44
10132000
7634
184.11
10133000
7623
512060
225
.04
10132000
7623
247.58
10133000
7623

24.72 10151000
7623
144.39
10131000
7623
128.34
10132000
7623
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
~\,\\\
CHECK
RUN
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4758
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4759
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4760
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4761
TOTAL:
08/02/2022
08192022
FUEL
PE
8/2/22

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL
08/02/2022
08192022
FUEL
PE
8/2/22

VEHICLE
FUEL

EQUIPMENT
MAINT
&
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL
08/09/2022
08192022
FUEL
PE
8/9/22

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL
Ip
1 apcshdsb
NET
2,125.56
2,125
.56
1,233.76 1,233.76 1,607.54 1,607.54
744
.17
744.17
1,750
.08
1,768
.70
1,147.30
6-207
~
-1
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
QTY~
rrllA
G~
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
4763
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50445
4764
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
30620248
4765
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
5427
4766
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:

INV-03827
4767
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:

DT-1054
Invoice:

DT-1053
4768
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50432
74 RANDAL
BYNDER
160.86
10141000
7623

79.78 10122000
7623
110.13
10123000
7623

26.46 21500000
7623
50445
744
.17
10151000
7200
274

CORELOGIC

INFORMATION

SOLUTIONS
I
30620248
307.50
10156000
7818
2140
BRUCE
W
FEAGLE
2590

CYBRARY
INC
5427
15,550.00
24282000
7891
INV-03827
1,416.00
10156000
7639
2783
DESERT

THEATRICALS,
LLC
DT-1054
5,065.96
10172000
7494
DESERT

THEATRICALS,
LLC
DT-1053
352.25
10172000
7494
1332

WILLIAM
ARNOLD
ENOS
50432
2,125.56
10151000
7200
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL

VEHICLE
FUEL
CHECK
PO
~\\\\\
CHECK
RUN
4762
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4763
TOTAL:

Ip
2 apcshdsb
NET
4,666.08
744.17 744.17
07/31/2022
08192022
307.50
REAL
QUEST

PROPERTY

SVCS/DOC
IMAGE
PE
7/31/22
DUES
&

SUBSCRIPTIONS
CHECK
4764
TOTAL
:
307.50
07/18/2022
20230092
08192022
15,550.00

PRODUCTION

SERIVCES-EDGE
OF
THE
SOLAR
SYSTEM

OBSERVATORY

PROGRAMMING CHECK
4765
TOTAL:
15,550.00
08/04/2022
08192022
IT
TEAMS

SUBSCRIPTION
8/8/22
-
8/7/23

COMPUTER

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
4766
TOTAL:
1,416.00 1,416.00
08/11
/2022
08192022
5,065
.96
REIMB
-

TRACKS/TRUSS

PICS/INSTALL
2023
SEASON

AMPHITHEATER

PROGRAMMING
07/26/2022
08192022

REHEARSAL
SPACE

UTILITIES
4/22/22

AMPHITHEATER

PROGRAMMING
CHECK
4767
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
352.25
5,418.21 2,125.56
6-208
',I
QTY~~
JIIRA
G~
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
CHECK
PO
~\\\\
CHECK
RUN
4768
TOTAL
:

Ip
3 apcshdsb
NET
2,125.56
4769
08/19/2022
EFT
1716

GRAINGER
9407201657
08/10/2022
08192022

51.60 Invoice:
9407201657
4770
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50424
4771
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50430
4772
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
725391
4773
08/19
/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50444
4774
08 /19
/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50366
4775
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50426

HYDRATION

SUPPLIES
-

STREETS

MAIN/TRAFFIC

SIGNALS

51.60 10132000
8000

SUPPLIES
1548

WILLIAM

HARRISON
26 BRUCE
B
HARRY
50424
262.74
10151000
7200
50430
1,576
.22
10151000
7200
28 HIGH
TECH

IRRIGATION
INC
725391
1663
G
DANA
HOBART
1,314
.70
21892000
8004
50444
644
.68
10151000
7200
34 ICMA

RETIREMENT
TRUST
-457
20,004
.39
101
50366
2235
1525
BRIAN
KNAPP
50426
1,607
.54
10151000
7200
CHECK
4769
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4770
TOTAL
:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4771
TOTAL
:
08/11
/2022
08192022
RAIN
BIRD
VALVES
-
RMC
PARK
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
CHECK
4772
TOTAL:
08/18
/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
08 /17/2022
ICMA
457
PE
08 /12
/22

DEFERRED
COMP
-
ICMA
CHECK
4773
TOTAL:
08192022
4774
TOTAL:
08/18
/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4775
TOTAL:

51. 60
262.74 262.74
1,576.22 1,576.22 1,314.70
1,314.70
644.68 644
.68
20,004.39 20,004
.39
1,607.54 1,607.54
6-209
~mm 08/18/2022
11:31
anac
OT
V
Of~
IIIRA
C~
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
4776
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50442
4777
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
52265
4778
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50440
4779
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
161728
4780
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50417
4781
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
517553274
Invoice:
517574042
Invoice:
517574045
238

BERNARD
B
.

KOPP
50442
600
.58
10151000
7200
1242

LEIGHTON

CONSULTING,
INC
3,105.40
357
52265
9540
127
DAVID
MARTIN
50440
2,125.56
10151000
7200
728
DBA

MAXIMUM

SECURITY
ALARM
SYSTEM
161728

85.00 10133300
7612
2614
DANIEL

MEDIANO
1317

MISSION
LINEN
SUPPLY

MISSION
LINEN
SUPPLY

MISSION
LINEN
SUPPLY
50417

57.32 24281000
7806
517553274

41.06 10133300
8002
517574042
35 .00
21500690
8002
517574045

66.86 10133300
8002
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
""'\~\,
CHECK
RUN
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4776
TOTAL:

Ip
4 apcshdsb
NET
600
.58
600.58
08/15/2022
20230048
08192022
3,105.40
CP
19-353:

GEOTECH

SEISMEC
-
FS
#50
PE
7/3
1/22

SEISMIC
&

BUILDING
UPGRD
ST#50
CHECK
4777
TOTAL:
3,105
.40
08/18/2022
08192022
2,125.56

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4778
TOTAL:
2,125.56
08 /11
/2022
08192022
85 .00
RPLC

BATTERIES
-
FLOOD

SENSORS
(CITY
HALL)
8/11/22

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
4779
TOTAL
:
08/17/2022
08192022

REFRESHMENTS
FOR

VOLUNTEER

MEETING
8/17/2022

MEETINGS
/TRAINING/TRAVEL
CHECK
4780
TOTAL:
08/09/2022
20230011
08192022

MAT/TWL
RENTAL
-
CITY
YARD
8/9/22

EQUIPMENT
RENTAL
08/11/2022
20230011
08192022
MAT
RENTAL
-
FS
#69
8/11/22

EQUIPMENT
RENTAL
08/11/2022
20230011
08192022
MAT
RENTAL
-
CITY
HALL
8/11/22

EQUIPMENT

RENTAL CHECK
4781
TOTAL:

85.00 57.32 57.32 41.06 35
.00
66 .86
142.92
6-210
OT
VOF~~G~
~\~\l
,,U
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
4782
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50371
4783
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50433
4784
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
2030216794
Invoice:
2030217035
4785
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50436
4786
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50369
Invoice:
50395
Invoice:
50396
4787
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50439
468

NATIONWIDE
133
SYLVIA
NINO
116

PARKHOUSE
TIRE

PARKHOUSE
TIRE
1808

PATRICK
PRATT
232
RMEA

MEMBERSHIP
RMEA

MEMBERSHIP
RMEA

MEMBERSHIP
1810
RON
HALL
1,099
.56
101
INVOICE 50371
2241
50433
1,126
.11
10151000
7200
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
CHECK
RUN
08/17/2022
08192022
PT

DEFERRED
COMP
PE
08/12/22

NATIONAL
-
PART
TIME
CHECK
4782
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4783
TOTAL:
2030216794
08/04/2022
08192022
TIRES
-
TS04

TRAFFIC

SIGNALS

25.33 10132000
7618

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

MAINT/ELEC
203021
7035
08/11/2022
08192022
RPR
FLAT
TIRE
-
TS0l

TRAFFIC

SIGNALS
8/11/22

29.44 10132000
7624

VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE
50436
1,607.54
10151000
7200
50369
1,020.00
101
2255
50395

77.70 101
2256
50396

33.90 101
2256
50439
600.58
10151000
7200
CHECK
4784
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
08/17/2022
RMEA
DUES
PE
08/12/22
RMEA

MEMBERSHIP
4785
TOTAL:
08192022
08/17/2022
08192022
RMEA

PREPAID
LEGAL
PE
08/12/22
RMEA

PREPAID
LEGAL
08/17/2022
08192022
RMEA

PREPAID
LEGAL
PE
08/12/22
RMEA

PREPAID
LEGAL
CHECK
4786
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
Ip
5 apcshdsb
NET
1,099.56 1,099
.56
l,
126
.11
1,126.11

25.33 29.44 54.77
1,607.54 1,607.54 1,020.00
77 .70

33.90 1,131.60
600.58
6-211
~~~
O
TV
Of~
rrl1AG~
~
~
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
4788
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50443
4789
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50427
4790
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50428
4791
08 /19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50431
2423

MICHAEL

SCHLANGE
1673

CYNTHIA
L.

SCOTT
2018
TOMAS
PEREZ
389
GREG
S.

TROUSDELL
INVOICE 50443
1,576.22
10151000
7200
50427
644.68
10151000
7200
50428
1,126.11
10151000
7200
50431
744
.17
10151000
7200
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
CHECK
PO
~\,\\1
CHECK
RUN
4787
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4788
TOTAL:
08 /18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4789
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4790
TOTAL:
08/18
/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4791
TOTAL:
4792
08 /19/2022
EFT
254

UNDERGROUND

SERVICES
ALERT
18DSBFE6523-2
08 /16
/2022
08192022
Invoice:
18DSBFE6523-2
CA
STATE
FEE

REGULATORY
COSTS
4793
08 /19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50383
4794
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50425
.30
10131000
7400

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
2864
VALET

CLEANERS,
INC.
50383
435.00
10141000
7550
242

VALLERIE
D
.

WALTHOUR
50425
1,110.45
10151000
7200
CHECK
4792
TOTAL:
08/04
/2022
08192022
COPS
DRY

CLEANING
3/22
-
7/22

CITY-WIDE
COPS

PROGRAM
CHECK
4793
TOTAL:
08 /18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4794
TOTAL:

Ip
6 apcshdsb
NET
600.58
1,576.22
1,576.22
644.68 644
.68
1,126.11 1,126.11
744.17 744.17
.30 .30
435
.00
435
.00
1,110.45 1,110.45
6-212
,u
08/18/2022
11:
31 anac
~
~
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
4795
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50434
4796
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
81045373
Invoice:
81093387
4797
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50435
4798
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
50394
4799
08/19/2022
EFT
Invoice:
551219
1674

RANDALL
J.

VIEGAS
50434
728.51
10151000
7200
1542
WAXIE

SANITARY
SUPPLY
81045373
WAXIE

SANITARY
SUPPLY
313
TROY
WILSON
282.68
24281000
8000
429.97
251
81093387
7510
50435
600.58
10151000
7200
1848

EMPLOYEE

BENEFIT

SPECIALISTS,
INC
50394
312.50
101
2280
1720
ZEN

AQUATICS
DESIGN
LTD
551219
300.00
24281000
7612
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
~\\\\
CHECK
RUN
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
07/19/2022

JANITORIAL

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES
4795
TOTAL:
08192022
08/09/2022
08192022
BIG
BELLY

RECYCLE
BIN
LINERS

SPECIAL

PROJECTS
CHECK
4796
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
08192022

MEDICAL

REIMBURSEMENT
9/22
GROUP

INSURANCE-MEDICAL
CHECK
4797
TOTAL:
08/17/2022
08192022
CHILD
CARE
PE
08/12/22
TAX

DEFERRED
CHILD
CARE
CHECK
4798
TOTAL:
08/01/2022
20230076
08192022

AQUARIUM

MAINTENANCE
7/2022

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
4799
TOTAL:

Ip
7 apcshdsb
NET
728.51 728.51 282
.68
429.97 712.65 600.58 600
.58
312.50 312.50 300.00 300.00
229190
08/19/2022
PRTD
1824
ACE

PRINTING
Invoice:
220714-01-1
220714-01-1
07/08/2022
08192022

10.46 229191
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
10 2846
SAUL
GUDINO

BALANCE
DUE
FOR
SUMMER

READING
LOGS

10.46 E
LB
SRC
-UNDEFINED
-UNDEFINED
-UNDEFINED
24281000
7919

FOUNDATN-LITERARY
LEGACY
CHECK
229190
TOTAL:

10.46 10
08/05/2022
08192022
2,450.00
2,450.00
201
7612
INSTL

PAVERS/GRANITE
-
FRANK

SINATRA
MEDIAN
8/5/22

MAINTENANCE
6-213
~
-'"'fl
OTVC>f~IYl<AG~
-.-..\\\\
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR

NAME SAUL
GUDINO
Invoice:
13 SAUL
GUDINO
Invoice:
12 INVOICE 13
250.00
21891000
7612
12 250.00
24281000
761
2 INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
CHECK
RUN
08/10/2022
08192022
RPLC

IRRIGATION
VALVE
-
DOG
PARK
8/10/22

MAINTENANCE
08/09/2022
08192022
RPR

LEAK/IRRGTN
VALVE
-

LIBRARY
8/9/22

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229191
TOTAL:
229192
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
4070
948

AIRWAVE

COMMUNICATIONS
4070
06/30/2022
08192022
229193
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
50367
56 ALTURA
CREDIT
UNION
229194
08/19/2022
PRTD
1592
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
448438979697
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
454994946559
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
467577848595
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
543747446555
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
795794349587
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
878885377797
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
965975643765
514.29
10142000
7824
23 AMP
POWER

SUPPLY/DESKTOP

MICROPHONE

COMMUNICATION

MAIN/SERV
176.00
101
50367
2245
CHECK
229192
TOTAL:
08/17/2022
08192022
CREDIT
UNION
PE
08/12/22

EMPLOYEE
CREDIT
UNION
CHECK
229193
TOTAL
:
448438979697
08/10/2022
08192022
PHONE

CASE/FAN

84.01 10156000
8012
SMALL
TOOLS,
FURN
&
EQUIP
454994946559
FAN

87.72 10156000
8012
08/10/2022
08192022
SMALL
TOOLS,
FURN
&
EQUIP
467577848595
08/10/2022
08192022
LUMBAR

SUPPORT
PILLOW

32.30 10156000
8012
SMALL
TOOLS,
FURN
&
EQUIP
543747446555
08/10/2022
08192022
SEAT

CUSHION

49.51 10156000
8012
SMALL
TOOLS,
FURN
&
EQUIP
795794349587
08/10/2022
08192022
RACK
MOUNT
SERVER

COOLING
FANS
284.45
10156000
8012
SMALL
TOOLS
,
FURN
&
EQUIP
878885377797
08/
10 /2022
08192022

PHILIPS
HUE

LIGHTBULBS
-

LIBRARY
96 .96
24281000
8004
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
965975643765
08/10/2022
08192022
SMALL
TOOLS
-

LIBRARY
Ip
8 apcshdsb
NET
250
.00
250.00
2,950.00
514.29 514.29 176.00 176.00 84
.01

87.72 32.30 49.51 284.45 96
. 96

33.38 6-214
OT
V
Of-~
rll<AG~
~
~\-.\\
'J.I
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME AMAZON.COM
Invoice
:
937846548475
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
464973747896
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
658555339447
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
755693339979

INVOICE

33.38 24281000
8012
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
SMALL
TOOLS,
FURN
&
EQUIP
CHECK
RUN
937846548475
08/10/2022
08192022

DIGITAL

THERMOMETER

15.09 10156000
8012
SMALL
TOOLS,
FURN
&
EQUIP
464973747896
08/10/2022
08192022

COMPUTER
DRIVE

54.95 10156000
8028

COMPUTER

ENHANCEMENT
658555339447
08/10/2022
08192022
WIFI

ADAPTER

36.62 10156000
8020

UNIFORMS
755693339979
08/10/2022
08192022
PHONE

CHARGERS
103
.37
10156000
8012
SMALL
TOOLS,
FURN
&
EQUIP
CHECK
229194
TOTAL:
229195
08/19/2022
PRTD
97 AMERICAN
PUBLIC
WORKS

ASSOCIATION
ID
894986
YR
2022-2306/02/2022
08192022
Invoice
:

ID
894986
YR
2022-23
MEMBER
DUES
-
J.

RUBERG
8/31/23
277.50
10132000
7818
DUES
&

SUBSCRIPTIONS
CHECK
229195
TOTAL:
229196
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
805401709
2484

AMERIGAS

PROPANE
LP
805401709
05/31/2022
08192022
229197
08/19/2022
PRTD
395
AT&T
Invoice:
000018638213
229198
08/19/2022
PRTD
1297

AUTOZONE,
INC
Invoice:
6227676814

PROPANE
TANKS
-
CITY
YARD
1,192.79
10133310
8004
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
CHECK
229196
TOTAL:
000018638213
08/13/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
8/12/22
(BAN
#9391019358)
265.33
28600000
7821

TELEPHONE
CHECK
229197
TOTAL:
6227676814
06/30/2022
08192022
CABIN
FILTER
-
ST07

VEHICLE

69.04 10132000
7624

VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229198
TOTAL:
229199
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
2036902613
1691
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036902613
07/26/2022
08192022
BOOKS

12.50 24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
Ip
9 apcshdsb
NET

15.09 54.95 36.62 103.37 878.36 277.50 277.50
1,192.79 1,192.79
265.33 265.33 69.04 69.04 12
.50
6-215
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
OT
V
Of~f'll1AG~
Is
~
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036902614
Invoice:
2036902614

15.05 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036902615
Invoice:
2036902615

11.53 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036902616
Invoice:
2036902616

57.70 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036902617
Invoice:
2036902617

19.41 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036902618
Invoice
:
2036902618

12.22 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036902619
Invoice:
2036902619

52.27 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036902620
Invoice:
2036902620

28.15 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036902621
Invoice:
2036902621
251.26
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036902622
Invoice
:
2036902622
1,124.56
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036902623
Invoice:
2036902623
392.52
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036902624
Invoice:
2036902624
249
.15
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036912744
Invoice:
2036912744
10 .50
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036912745
Invoice
:
2036912
745

15.14 24281000
7912
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
07/26/2022
BOOKS
PO

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/26/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
.
07/26/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/26/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/26/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/26/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/26/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/26/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/26/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/26/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/26/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/29/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/29/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
~\\\\1
CHECK
RUN
08192022 08192022 08192022 08192022 08192022 08192022 08192022 08192022 08192022 08192022 08192022 08192022 08192022 IP
10 apcshdsb
NET

15.05 11.
53 57.70 19.41 12.22 52.27 28.15 251.26
1,124
.56
392.52 249.15 10.50 15.14
6-216
~
-1
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
OTY
~
~
l'l<AG~
~
~
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036912746
Invoice:
2036912746

19.76 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036912747
Invoice:
2036912747

41.69 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036912748
Invoice:
2036912748
18 .13
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036912749
Invoice:
2036912749

11.00 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036912750
Invoice:
2036912750

33.65 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036912751
Invoice:
2036912751

22.65 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036912752
Invoice:
2036912752

22.66 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036912753
Invoice
:
2036912753
135.36
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036912754
Invoice:
2036912754

18.74 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036917784
Invoice
:
2036917784

55.03 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036917018
Invoice
:
2036917018
18 .13
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036917019
Invoice:
2036917019

17.48 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
20369
1702
0 Invoice
:
2036917020
19 .4
2 24281000
7912
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
07/29/2022
BOOKS
PO

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/29/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/29/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/29/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/29/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/29/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/29/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/29/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
07/29/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08 /01/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/01/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/01/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/01/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
U'-\\\\\
Ip
11 apcshdsb
CHECK
RUN
NET
08192022

19.76 08192022

41.69 08192022
18 .13
08192022

11. 00
08192022
33 .6
5 08192022

22.65 08192022

22.66 08192022
135.36
08192022

18.74 08192022

55.03 08192022
18 .13
08192022

17.48 08192022

19.42 6-217
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
OTV
OF~
rrl(AC~
~\,\\,
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
CHECK
RUN
Invoice
:
2036917021
Invoice:
2036917022
Invoice:
2036917023
Invoice:
2036917024
Invoice:

H62194110
229200
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
95736
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036917021
08/01/2022
08192022
BOOKS
172.74
24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036917022
08/01/2022
08192022
BOOKS

14.21 24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036917023
08/01/2022
08192022
BOOKS
873.58
24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036917024
08/01/2022
08192022
BOOKS
263.79
24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
H62194110
08/04/2022
08192022
DVDS
103.61
E
LB
ELECT
-UNDEFINED
-UNDEFINED
-UNDEFINED
24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
4 BEST
SIGNS

INCORPORATED
95736
537.09
10134000
9450
CHECK
229199
TOTAL:
08/12/2022
08192022
WHITE
OPAQUE
WINDOW
SCREEN
-
CITY
HALL
ROOM
CITY
HALL

BUILDING
IMPROV
CHECK
229200
TOTAL:
229201
08/19/2022
PRTD
584

BLACKBAUD
CRM00360460
06/30/2022
08192022
Invoice
:

CRM00360460
CREDIT
-

E-TAPESTRY

SERVICE
PE
11/25/22
-1,636.56
24281000
8028

COMPUTER

ENHANCEMENT

BLACKBAUD
INV-0000214637
08/17/2022
08192022
Invoice:

INV-0000214637

ETAPISTRY

SOFTWARE

SUBSCRIPTION
FY
22/23
5,315.64
244
7639

COMPUTER

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229201
TOTAL:

IP
12 apcshdsb
NET
172.74 14.21 873
.58
263.79 103.61
4,113.59
537.09 537.09
-1,636.56 5,315
.64
3,679.08
229202
08/19/2022
PRTD
2860

CHARTER

COMMUNICATIONS
0058273073022
07/30/2022
08192022
219.79
Invoice:
0058273073022
SVC
PE
8/29/22
FS
#50
(ACCT
#8448-41-077-0058273
219
.79
21500500
7826

INTERNET
ACCESS
&

SERVICE

CHARTER

COMMUNICATIONS
0324436072622
07/26/2022
08192022
1,213.72
Invoice:
0324436072622

SERVICE
PE
8/25/22
(ACCT
#8448-41-077-0324436)
1,213
.72
24281000
7826
IN
TERNET
ACCESS
&

SERVICE
6-218
~,m
OT
V
OF
~
l'IMG~
08/18/2022
11 :31
anac
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
~,\\\
CHECK
RUN
IP
13 apcshdsb
NET

CHARTER

COMMUNICATIONS
0034522080122
08/01/2022
08192022
178.24
Invoice
:
0034522080122

SERVICE
PE
8/31/22
(ACCT
#8448-41-077-0034522)
178.24
10151000
7824

COMMUNICATION

MAIN/SERV

CHARTER

COMMUNICATIONS
0469884080922
08/09/2022
08192022
990
.39
Invoice
:
0469884080922

SERVICE
PE
9/8/22
(ACCT#
8448-41-077-0469884)
990.39
10151000
7824

COMMUNICATION

MAIN/SERV

CHARTER

COMMUNICATIONS
0469892080922
08/09/2022
08192022
1,627.07
Invoice:
0469892080922

SERVICE
PE
9/8/22
(ACCT
#8448-41-077-0469892)
229203
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
48675
1,627.07
10151000
7824

COMMUNICATION

MAIN/SERV
CHECK
229202
TOTAL:
245

COACHELLA
VALLEY
RESCUE

MISSION
48675
07/07/2022
08192022

CONTRACT

SERVICES
8/22
3,500
.00
10153000
7595
DESERT

RESOURCE
CENTER
CHECK
229203
TOTAL:
229204
08/19
/2022
PRTD
1228
COUNTY
OF

RIVERSIDE

SHERIFF
DEPT
SH0000041641
06 /30/2022
08192022
Invoice:

SH0000041641
ANNUAL
CLETS
FY
21 /22
54,144.00
10141000
7400

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK
229204
TOTAL:
229205
08/19/2022
PRTD
2799
COUNTY
OF

RIVERSIDE
PE0000000466
08 /08/2022
08192022
Invoice:

PE0000000466
APX
MAINT
PE
7/31
/22
229206
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
5307
229207
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
1331898
515.29
10141000
7400

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
1430

CREATIVE
SALES
INC
5307
9,174.45
10141000
7550
325
SHADE

STRUCTURES
INC
1331898
6,065.61
10133310
7612
CHECK
229205
TOTAL:
06 /21
/2022
20220262
08192022

FURNITURE
/STORAGE
/CUBICLES
-
COPS
OFFICE

CITY-WIDE
COPS

PROGRAM
CHECK
229206
TOTAL:
08/12/2022
20230017
08192022
SHADE

STRUCTURE
-
CITY
YARD

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229207
TOTAL:
4,229.21
3,500.00
3,500.00
54 ,144
.00
54,144
.00
515.29 515
.29
9,174.45 9,174.45 6,065.61 6,065
.61
6-219
,,U
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
~
~
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
229208
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
7155304
229209
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
50968
Invoice:
51094
229210
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
0004803657
229211
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
910023709
Invoice:
910024116
229212
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:

V2610138
120
DEMCO
INC
1491
DESERT
ARC
DESERT
ARC
7155304
427.13
24281000
8000
50968
735.00
10133320
7612
51094

60.00 10112000
7400

60.00 24281000
7400
19 DESERT
SUN

PUBLISHING
CO
0004803657
403
EMCOR

SERVICE
EMCOR

SERVICE
259.60
10112000
7842
910023709
1,870.82
10133300
7612
345.00
10133310
7612
106.67
21500500
7612
154.00
21500690
7612

90.00 21892000
7612
1,435.67
24281000
7612

79.50 24282000
7613
910024116
470
.00
10133300
7612
2502
EPLUS

TECHNOLOGY,
INC
V2610138
5,689.90
10156000
7639
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
07/19/2022

PROCESSING

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES
CHECK
PO
~\~\\
CHECK
RUN
08192022
229208
TOTAL:
08/08/2022
08192022

LANDSCAPE

MAINTENANCE
-
POST
OFFICE
8/22

MAINTENANCE
IP
14 apcshdsb
NET
427
.13
427
.13
735.00
08/15/2022
08192022
120.00

SHREDDING

SERVICES
-
CITY

HALL/LIBRARY
PE
7/12/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK
229209
TOTAL:
08 /01/2022
08192022
PUBLIC
HEAR

NOTICES
PE
7/3
1/22
(ACCT
#233062)

ADVERTISING/PUBLISHING
CHECK
229210
TOTAL
:
08/03/2022
20230020
08192022
HVAC

MAINTENANCE
PE
8/31/22

MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE OBSERVATORY

MAINTENANCE
08/10/2022
20230020
-08192022
UPDATE
SSL

CERTIFICATES
-
CITY
HALL
8/1/22

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229211
TOTAL:
08/08/2022
20230091
08192022

NETWORK

SECURITY

SOFTWARE

LICENES

COMPUTER

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229212
TOTAL:
855.00 259
.60
259.60
4,081.66
470
.00
4,551.66 5,689.90 5,689.90
6-220
'I
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
~
~
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
229213
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
15749
229214
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
6011924
Invoice:
6044009
Invoice
:
5974492
Invoice:
9044643
Invoice
:
5050414
Invoice:
8013735
Invoice:
7410273
Invoice:
6023102
Invoice:
6051347
Invoice:
5051523
Invoice:
2410365
2552

HENRY'S

COLLISION
AUTO
BODY
&
PAI
15749
420
.00
10141000
7624
146
THE
HOME
DEPOT
6011924
4,283.40
10132000
8012
THE
HOME
DEPOT
6044009

54.82 24281000
8004
THE
HOME
DEPOT
5974492
1,939.50
10142000
7486
THE
HOME
DEPOT
9044643
260.46
21893000
8004
THE
HOME
DEPOT
5050414

82.55 10133000
7612
THE
HOME
DEPOT
8013735
172.23
24281000
8004
THE
HOME
DEPOT
7410273
101.10
21500690
8004
THE
HOME
DEPOT
6023102

14.93 24281000
8004
THE
HOME
DEPOT
6051347
100.12
205
8000
THE
HOME
DEPOT
5051523

20.83 201
8000
THE
HOME
DEPOT
2410365
308.20
21500690
8004
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
~\\.\\
CHECK
RUN
06/30/2022
08192022
RPR
REAR
BUMPER
-
19 FORD
F-450

VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229213
TOTAL:
06/30/2022
08192022
TOOLS
SMALL
TOOLS,
FURN
&
EQUIP
06/30/2022
08192022

RESTROOM
LOCKS
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
06/30/2022
08192022
GRAB
NGO

EMERGENCY

BACKPACKS

COMMUNITY
FORUMS
07/07/2022
08192022

ELECTRICAL
FOR

WOLFSON
PARK
LIGHTS
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
07/11/2022
08192022

GROMMETS
FOR

FENCING

MAINTENANCE
07/18/2022
08192022
MOVING

BLANKETS
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
07/19/2022
08192022

SUPPLIES
-
JASON
HAWLEY
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
07/20/2022
08192022

BRAIDED
FAUCET
SUPPL
Y
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
IP
15 apcshdsb
NET
420.00 420.00
4,283.40

54.82 1,939.50
260.46 82.55 172.23 101.10 14.93
07/20/2022
08192022
100.12

IRRIGATION
TUBING
FOR
ASH

INSTALLATION-CYPRESS

SUPPLIES
07/21/2022
08192022

ELECTRICAL
FOR
BOB
HOPE
MED

SUPPLIES
07/24/2022
08192022

SUPPLIES
-
CORY

CLAUSON
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES

20.83 308.20
6-221

OJY()(-
~
rwl<AG?.
~\\\\\
anac
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
CHECK
RUN
THE
HOME
DEPOT
1430413
Invoice:
1430413
253.02
21500500
8004
THE
HOME
DEPOT
1430414
Invoice:
1430414

34.33 21500500
8004
THE
HOME
DEPOT
430417
Invoice:
430417

44.22 21500500
8004
THE
HOME
DEPOT
5414841
Invoice:
5414841
-2,105.43
10132000
8012
07/25/2022
08192022

SUPPLIES
-

MATTHEW
GOTTA
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
07/25/2022
08192022
BATH
HOOK
-

MATTHEW
GOTTA
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
07/26/2022
08192022

SUPPLIES
-

MATTHEW
GOTTA
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
06/30/2022
08192022

PARTIAL
RETURN
TOOLS
(ORIG
INV
#6011924)
SMALL
TOOLS,
FURN
&
EQUIP
CHECK
229214
TOTAL:
229215
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
821560
312
HONDA
OF
THE
DESERT
821560

81.90 10151000
7624
08/04/2022
08192022
SVC
-
FL05
CITY
POOL

VEHICLE
8/4/22

VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229215
TOTAL:
229216
08/19/2022
PRTD
30 IMPERIAL

IRRIGATION

DISTRICT
50337817072922
08/02/2022
08192022
Invoice
:
50337817072922

SERVICE
PE
7/29/22
(ACCT
#50337817)
Invoice:
50339422072822
Invoice:
50053574072822
Invoice:
50179009072822
Invoice
:
50214431072822
Invoice
:
50423112072822
Invoice:
50474721072822
1,501.64
10133310
7603

ELECTRICITY

IMPERIAL

IRRIGATION

DISTRICT
50339422072822
08/02/2022
08192022

SERVICVE
PE
7/29/22
(ACCT
#50339422)

27.12 10132000
7618

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

MAINT/ELEC

IMPERIAL

IRRIGATION

DISTRICT
50053574072822
08/02/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
7/28/22
(ACCT
#500535
74 )

27.53 10132000
7618

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

MAINT/ELEC

IMPERIAL

IRRIGATION

DISTRICT

21.10 201

IMPERIAL

IRRIGATION

DISTRICT

25.21 201
50179009072822
08/02/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
7/28/22
(ACCT
#501
790
09)
7603

ELECTRICITY
50214431072822
08/02/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
7/28/22
(ACCT
#50214431)
7603

ELECTRICITY

IMPERIAL

IRRIGATION

DISTRICT
50423112072822
08/02/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
7/28/22
(ACCT
#50423112)
27 .67
10132000
7618

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

MAINT/ELEC

IMPERIAL

IRRIGATION

DISTRICT
50474721072822
08/02
/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
7/28/22
(ACCT
#50474721)
IP
16 apcshdsb
NET
253.02 34.33 44.22
-2,105.43 5,564.28

81. 90

81. 90
1,501.64
27 .12

27.53 21.10 25.21 27.67 67
.64
6-222
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
O
TV
Of-~l'l<AG~
ITT,
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
~\~\\
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
CHECK
RUN
Invoice:
50602360072822
Invoice:
50705330072822
Invoice:
50409925072822
Invoice:
50478828072822
Invoice:
50765125072822

67.64 10132000
7618

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

MAINT/ELEC

IMPERIAL

IRRIGATION

DISTRICT
50602360072822
08/02/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
7/28/22
(ACCT
#50602360)

66.01 10132000
7618

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

MAINT/ELEC

IMPERIAL

IRRIGATION

DISTRICT
50705330072822
08/02/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
7/28/22
(ACCT
#50705330)

28.99 21891000
7603

ELECTRICITY

IMPERIAL

IRRIGATION

DISTRICT
50409925072822
08/02/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
7/28/22
(ACCT
#50409925)

59.70 10132000
7618

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

MAINT/ELEC

IMPERIAL

IRRIGATION

DISTRICT
50478828072822
08/02/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
7/28/22
(ACCT
#50478828)

28.63 10132000
7618

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

MAINT/ELEC

IMPERIAL

IRRIGATION

DISTRICT
15 .43
201
50765125072822
08/02/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
7/28/22
(ACCT
#50765125)
7603

ELECTRICITY
CHECK
229216
TOTAL:
229217
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
50418
2880
JOHN
WATERS
50418
1230
08/17/2022
08192022
2024
RMWF

DEPOSIT
-
J
WATERS
15,000
.00
244

PREPAID
ITEMS
CHECK
229217
TOTAL:
229218
08 /19/2022
PRTD
2247
THE
LIVING
DESERT
ZOO
&

GARDENS
15105500446411
-2022
08 /11/2022
08192022
Invoice
:
15105500446411-2022
MEMBER
DUES
-
TED
WEILL
229219
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
36149880
Invoice
:
36149881
119
.95
10111000
7818
DUES
&

SUBSCRIPTIONS
2850
MARTIN

MARIETTA

MATERIALS,
INC
36149880
206.50
10132000
7621
MARTIN

MARIETTA

MATERIALS,
INC
36149881

64.65 10132000
7621
CHECK
229218
TOTAL
:
07/15
/2022
08192022

ASPHALT
STREET

RELATED

REPAIRS
07/15/2022

ASPHALT
STREET

RELATED

REPAIRS
08192022
CHECK
229219
TOTAL:

IP
17 apcshdsb
NET

66.01 28.99 59.70 28.63 15.43
1,896
.67
15,000.00 15,000.00
119.
95 119.
95 206.50 64.65
271.
15 6-223
'~
OT
V
~~l'l<AG~
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
'IM,,\\\\1
CHECK
RUN
IP
18 apcshdsb
NET
229220
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
19-014.17
1016

MCAULIFFE
&
CO
INC.
19 -014.17
06/30/2022
20220060
08192022
2,607.50
2,607.50
21500500
9540

SEISMIC
&

BUILDING

IMPROVEMENTS
-FS#50
PE
6/30/22

SEISMIC
&

BUILDING
UPGRD
ST#50
229221
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
2019-04.31
229222
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
22072918951
229223
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
243763
CHECK
229220
TOTAL:
437
NAI

CONSULTING
INC
2019-04.31
08/05/2022
20230065
08192022
CP
14-313:

CALTRANS

COMPLIANCE
PE
7/31/22
160.50
10134000
9523
RMN
RD
ST
WID/FR

RGT/SND
1464

NETWORK

INNOVATIONS
US
INC
22072918951
243
.01
10142000
7824
2237
NISSHO
OF

CALIFORNIA,
INC
243763
1,302.00
10132000
7630
CHECK
229221
TOTAL:
08/09/2022
20230043
08192022

SATELLITE
PHONE

SERVICE
PE
7/31/22

COMMUNICATION

MAIN/SERV
CHECK
229222
TOTAL
:
07/31/2022
20230008
08192022

LANDSCAPE

MAINTENANCE
-
TRAILS
7/22
TRAILS
&
BIKE
PATH
MAINT
CHECK
229223
TOTAL
:
229224
08/19/2022
PRTD
2852
ODP

BUSINESS

SOLUTIONS,
LLC
259799899001
08/09/2022
08192022
Invoice:
259799899001

NAPKINS/CORRECTION

TAPE/PENS
Invoice
:
260007803001
229225
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
320050
Invoice
:
320051
Invoice:
320262

69.58 10151000
8000

SUPPLIES
ODP

BUSINESS

SOLUTIONS,
LLC
260007803001
08/11/2022
08192022
447
ON
THE
FLY

SERVICES,
ON
THE
FLY

SERVICES,
ON
THE
FLY

SERVICES,
PAPER
180.98
10151000
8000

SUPPLIES
INC
320050
40 .00
10133300
7612
INC
320051

32.00 21500500
7612
INC
320262

32.00 21500690
7612
CHECK
229224
TOTAL:
07/08/2022
20230010
08192022
PEST

CONTROL
-
CITY
HALL
7/22

MAINTENANCE
07/08/2022
20230010
08192022
PEST

CONTROL
-
FS
#50
7/22

MAINTENANCE
07 /13/2022
20230010
08192022
PEST

CONTROL
-
FS
#69
7/22

MAINTENANCE
2,607
.50
160.50 160.50 243.01 243
.01
1,302
.00
1,302.00

69.58 180.98 250
.56

40.00 32.00 32.00
6-224
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
OT
Y
Of~~~
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
ON
THE
FLY

SERVICES,
INC
320170
Invoice:
320170

52.00 10133310
7612
ON
THE
FLY

SERVICES,
INC
320169
Invoice:
320169
60 .00
21892000
7612
229226
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999

ANNETTE
SELLON
NEM20220500
Invoice:

NEM20220500
172.86
600
2653
229227
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
CONNIE
J
ALLEY
NEM20220435
Invoice:

NEM20220435
779
.12
600
2653
229228
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
DINA
SIM
NEM20220793
Invoice:

NEM20220793
151.68
600
2653
229229
08 /19/2022
PRTD
99999
DONALD
M

WOOLHOUSE
NEM20220731
Invoice:

NEM20220731
273
.04
600
2653
229230
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
EVA
FLATT
NEM20220545
Invoice:

NEM20220545
96 . 41
600
2653
229231
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
GARY
I
YAVITZ
NEM20220657
Invoice:

NEM20220657
159.37
600
2653
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
~\\\\1
CHECK
RUN
07/12/2022
20230010
08192022
PEST

CONTROL
-
CITY
YARD
7/22

MAINTENANCE
07/12/2022
20230010
08192022
PEST

CONTROL
SVC
-

AMPHITHEATER
7/22

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229225
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229226
TOTAL:
07/27
/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229227
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229228
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY
METER
ING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229229
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229230
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
IP
19 apcshdsb
NET

52.00 60.00 216.00 172
.86
172
.86
779
.12
779
.12
151
.68
151.68 273.04 273.04 96.41 96.41 159.37
6-225
OTV~~lrl<AG~
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
229232
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
JAMES
T

THOMPSON
Invoice:

NEM20220217
229233
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
JANE

ZALUTSKY
Invoice:

NEM20220013
229234
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
JOHN
A

MACMAHON
Invoice:

NEM20220704
229235
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
JOHN
EDDY
Invoice:

NEM20220201
229236
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
JOSEPH

MANTELLO
Invoice:

NEM20220765
229237
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
JULIE
AUSTIN
Invoice:

NEM20220904
229238
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
JULIE
P
TYBOUT
Invoice:

NEM20220537
80 .50
600
154.33
600
370.50
600

43.02 600
929
.04
600
205.81
600
239
.50
600
INVOICE NEM20220217
2653
NEM20220013
2653
NEM20220704
2653
NEM20220201
2653
NEM20220765
2653
NEM20220904
2653
NEM20220537
2653
~\\\\l
INV
DATE
PO
CHECK
RUN

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
CHECK
229231
TOTAL
:
06/30/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY
METER
ING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229232
TOTAL:
06/30/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229233
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229234
TOTAL:
06/30/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229235
TOTAL
:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229236
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229237
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229238
TOTAL:

Ip
20 apcshdsb
NET
159.37 80.50 80.50 154
.33
154.33 370.50 370
.50
43 .02

43. 02
929.04 929.04 205.81 205.81 239.50 239
.50
6-226
OT
V
~
~
~~
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
229239
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
KEIJI

IKEZAKI
Invoice:

NEM20220486
229240
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999

LAUREEN
ONG
Invoice:

NEM20220402
229241
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999

MARGARET

SPANIOLO
Invoice:

NEM20220604
229242
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
MEAGAN
JAMES
Invoice:

NEM20220503
229243
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999

MICHAEL
W
SANTO
Invoice:

NEM20220806
229244
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
PATTI

HOLTZMAN
Invoice
:

NEM20220726
229245
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999

RICHARD

JENKINS
Invoice:

NEM20220593
328.90
600
276.36
600

66.95 600
101
.33
600

35.61 600
512.18
600
247.04
600
INVOICE NEM20220486
2653
NEM20220402
2653
NEM20220604
2653
NEM20220503
2653
NEM20220806
2653
NEM20220726
2653
NEM20220593
2653
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
07/27/2022
PO
~\\\\\
CHECK
RUN
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229239
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229240
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229241
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229242
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229243
TOTAL
:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229244
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229245
TOTAL:

IP
21 apcshdsb
NET
328.90 328.90 276
.36
276.36 66.95 66.95 101.33 101.33 35
.61

35.61 512.18 512.18 247.04 247.04
6-227
~
~
•.U
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
229246
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
ROBERT

SHEPARD
Invoice:

NEM20220058
229247
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
SALLY
HARB
Invoice:

NEM20220573
229248
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
SARAH
CONNER
Invoice:

NEM20220364
229249
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999
STEVEN
DIETZ
Invoice:

NEM20220754
229250
08/19/2022
PRTD
99999

WILLIAMS
KIM
Invoice:

NEM20220282
INVOICE NEM20220058
240.34
600
2653
NEM20220573
212.04
600
2653
NEM20220364
240.29
600
2653
NEM20220754
247.22
600
2653
NEM20220282
186.64
600
2653
229251
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
30553
Invoice:
30619
Invoice:
30712
1893

PACIFIC

PRODUCTS
AND

SERVICES
LLC
305
53 147.64
10133310
8004

PACIFIC

PRODUCTS
AND

SERVICES
LLC
30619
142.55
10132000
7618

PACIFIC

PRODUCTS
AND

SERVICES
LLC
30712
182.65
10133310
8004
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
06/30/2022
PO
-..,\\\\
CHECK
RUN
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229246
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229247
TOTAL:
06/30/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229248
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229249
TOTAL:
06/30/2022
08192022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229250
TOTAL:
07/13/2022
08192022

VISITOR
SIGNS
-
CITY
YARD
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
07/29/2022
08192022
SIGNS
-

COUNTRY
CLUB

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

MAINT/ELEC
08/12/2022
08192022

HAZARDOUS
SIGNS
-
CITY
YARD
REPAIR
&
MAINT

SUPPLIES
CHECK
229251
TOTAL:

IP
22 apcshdsb
NET
240.34 240.34 212.04 212.
04 240.29 240.29 247.22 247.22 186.64 186.64 147.64 142.55 182.65 472.84 6-228
·,,1.,1
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
OTY
Of
~rrll.A
G~
~
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
229252
08 /19
/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
2091834
229253
08 /19
/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
816007
Invoice
:
816125
Invoice:
816338
229254
08/19
/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
0022327-IN
229255
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
27385827
Invoice:
27584184
229256
08 /19
/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
151926
229257
08 /19
/2022
PRTD
In
voice
:

QES042222
360

PACIFIC

TELEMANAGEMENT

SERVICES'
2091834

35.00 24281000
7821
45 PALM

SPRINGS
MOTORS
INC
816007

87.70 10123000
7624
PALM

SPRINGS
MOTORS
INC
816125
75 .05
10133000
7624
PALM

SPRINGS
MOTORS
INC
816338
187
.15
10133000
7624
664

PARAGON

PARTNERS
LTD
0022327-IN

95.00 10134000
9523
2832

PEOPLEREADY
INC
27385827
2,121.84
10132000
7444

PEOPLEREADY
INC
27584184
2,424
.96
10132000
7444
5 POWERS
AWARDS
151926
45 .79
24281000
8000

45.79 10142000
7486
1566

RICHARD
K Y
ATES
QES042222
2,126
.65
10134000
9450
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
08 /04
/2022

SERVICE
PE
9/30/2022

TELEPHONE
PO
~\\\\\
CHECK
RUN
08192022
CHECK
229252
TOTAL:
08 /03
/2022
08192022
SVC
-
CC04
CODE

VEHICLE
8/3/22

VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE
08/05/2022
08192022
SVC
-
FL15
CMAX
8/5/
22 VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE
08 /08/2022
08192022
SVC
-

STAKEBED
8/8/22

VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229253
TOTAL:
07 /31
/2022
20230073
08192022
Ip
23 apcshdsb
NET

35.00 35.00 87.70 75.05 187.15 349.90 95.00

CONSULTING
SVCS
-
RAMON
RD
SAND
FENCE
PE
7/31
/22
RMN
RD
ST
WID
/FR
RGT
/SND
CHECK
229254
TOTAL:
95 .00
05 /17
/2022
08 192022
2,121
.84
J
.

HIGAREDA
/
A
.

PEREZ
PE
5/13
/22

TEMPORARY
AGENCY

SERVICES
08 /16/2022
08192022
2,424
.96
M.

BEJARANO/
A.

PEREZ
PE
8/14/22

TEMPORARY
AGENCY

SERVICES
CHECK
229255
TOTAL:
4,546.80
05 /25
/2022
08192022

91. 58
NAME
BADGE
/PLATES
-

LIBRARY/COMMUNITY
FORUMS

SUPPLIES COMMUNITY

FORUMS CHECK
229256
TOTAL:

91.58 06
/30
/2022
08192022
2,126.65

INSTALL

DIMMERS
-

PLANNING

OFFICES
CITY
HALL

BUILDING
IMPROV
6-229
-~,~ 08/18/2022
11:31
anac
OT
V
OF~
rrl<AG~
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
229258
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:

WOG00014039
229259
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
33072
229260
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
50328
229261
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:

SS-0552
229262
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
3959
229263
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
1514
229264
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
9548080122
1827
QUINN

COMPANY
WOG00014039
193.24
24281000
7612
2680

RENEGADE
PEST

CONTROL
INC
33072
105.00
21500690
7612
1911

RIVERSIDE
COUNTY
DEPUTY

SHERIFF
R
50328
5,000.00
10141000
7400
2767
SAVANT

SOLUTIONS,
INC
SS-0552
38,305.75
10156000
7400
1484
SEA
WEST

ENTERPRISES,
INC
3959
9,035.00
24281000
7613
1897
SHORT

EDITION
1514
720.00
244
7639
3,840.00
244
7818
61 SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
9548080122
442.63
201
7603

SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
6812080122
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
CHECK
08/16/2022
PO
~\\\
CHECK
RUN
229257
TOTAL:
08192022

SERVICE
-

CATERPILLAR

LIBRARY
8/16/22

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229258
TOTAL:
08/11/2022
08192022
PEST

CONTROL
-
FS
#69
8/11/22

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229259
TOTAL:

Ip
24 apcshdsb
NET
2,126
.65
193.24 193.24 105.00 105.00
08/16/2022
20230089
08192022
5,000.00

SPONSORSHIP
-
RIVCO

SHERIFF

TOURNAMENT
2022

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK
229260
TOTAL:
5,000.00
07/29/2022
20230050
08192022
38,305.75

CLOUD-BASED

CYBERSECURITY

SERVICES
PE
7/24/23

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK
229261
TOTAL:
38,305
.75
08/10/2022
20230066
08192022
9,035.00

MAINTENANCE
AND

SERVICE
ON

OBSERVATORY
DOME
FY
23 OBSERVATORY

MAINTENANCE CHECK
229262
TOTAL:
9,035.00
08/10/2022
20230082
08192022
4,560.00

SHORT STORY
KIOSK

SUBSCRIPTION,

CONNECTION
&
MAINT

COMPUTER

MAINTENANCE
DUES
&

SUBSCRIPTIONS
CHECK
229263
TOTAL
:
4,560.00
08/05/2022
08192022
442.63

SERVICE
PE
8/1/22
(ACCT#
700183359548)

ELECTRICITY
08/05/2022
08192022
733.71
6-230
~ll'ffi 08/18/2022
11:31
anac
~
~
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
Invoice:
6812080122
Invoice:
5954080222
Invoice:
6905080322
Invoice:
4524081422
Invoice
:
3714081422
229265
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
80665080222
229266
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
50370
229267
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:

INV06198
229268
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
1095304
Invoice:
1095305
270.96
21895000
7603
404.99
21892000
7603

57.76 21893000
7603

SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
5954080222

33.09 201
7603

SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
6905080322
1,391.57
10132000
7618

SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
4524081422
5,370.86
10133300
7603

SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
3714081422
4,44

7.01 10132000
7618
62 SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
GAS

COMPANY
80665080222

25.53 10133310
7600
233
STATE

DISBURSEMENT
UNIT
126.92
101
532

SUNLINE

TRANSIT
AGENCY
50370
2260
INV06198
3,655.16
10133000
7612
67 TOPS
N

BARRICADES,
INC
1095304
2,490.38
10132000
7624
TOPS
N

BARRICADES,
INC
1095305
1,529.94
10132000
7624
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
~\\\\\
CHECK
RUN

SERVICE
PE
8/1/22
(ACCT
#700349196812)

ELECTRICITY ELECTRICITY ELECTRICITY
08/05/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
8/2/22
(ACCT#
700013745954)

ELECTRICITY
08/08/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
8/03/22
(ACCT#
700394436905)

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

MAINT/ELEC
08/17/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
8/14/22
(ACCT#
700275914524)

ELECTRICITY
08/17/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
8/14/22
(ACCT#700380343714)

TRAFFIC
SIGNAL

MAINT/ELEC
CHECK
229264
TOTAL:
08/05/2022
08192022

SERVICE
PE
8/02/22
(ACCT#
170-464-8066-5)

NATURAL
GAS
CHECK
229265
TOTAL:
08/17/2022
08192022
CHILD

SUPPORT
PE
08/12/22
CHILD

SUPPORT
CHECK
229266
TOTAL:
07/31/2022
20230007
08192022
BUS

SHELTER

MAINTENANCE
7/22

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
08/03/2022
ARROW
BOARD

VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE
08/03/2022

ARROWBOARD

VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE
229267
TOTAL:
08192022 08192022
IP
25 apcshdsb
NET

33.09 1,391.57 5,370.86
4,447.01 12,418
.87

25.53 25.53 126.92 126.92
3,655.16 3,655.16 2,490.38 1,529.94
6-231
·,.1.1
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
OTV
Of~
f'll<AG~
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
Invoice:
1095320
229269
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:

TOCS822359
229270
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
045-375097
229271
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:

CI287007
Invoice:

CI287244
2292
72 08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
50368
229273
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:

BW6390709
229274
08 /19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
32507
TOPS
N

BARRICADES,
INC
1095320
107.70
10132000
8003
1990
TOYOTA
OF
THE
DESERT
TOCS822359
1,032.61
10122000
7624
1509
TYLER

TECHNOLOGIES
INC
045-37509
7 10,158.20
10156000
7639
2865
UNITED
ROTARY
BRUSH

CORPORATION
CI287007
1,815
.12
10132000
7634
UNITED
ROTARY
BRUSH

CORPORATION
CI287244
331.33
10132000
7634
68 UNITED
WAY
OF
THE
DESERT
50368
2250
174
VALLEY
LOCK
&
SAFE
1530

VERTICAL

VISIONS

8.85 101
BW6390709

61.17 10141000
7550
32507
264.00
21500500
7612
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
~\\\\\
CHECK
RUN
08/04
/2022
08192022
GUARD
RAIL
STREET
SIGNS
&

MARKINGS
CHECK
229268
TOTAL:

IP
26 apcshdsb
NET
107.70
4,128.02
08/09/2022
08192022
1,032
.61

SVC/BATTERY/FRNT
BRKS
-
BS05
BLDG

VEHICLE
8/9/22

VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229269
TOTAL:
05/01
/2022
20230088
08192022
PACE
10 TRAINING
PE
5/31/23

COMPUTER

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229270
TOTAL:
07 /29/2022
08192022
WAFER

BRUSHES
-
CITY
YARD

EQUIPMENT
MAINT
&
FUEL
08/05/2022
08192022
WAFER

BRUSHES

EQUIPMENT
MAINT
&
FUEL
CHECK
2292
71 TOTAL:
08 /17/2022
UNITED
WAY
PE
08/12/22

DONATIONS-UNITED
WAY
08192022
CHECK
229272
TOTAL
:
08/16/2022
08192022
KEYS
FOR
COPS

CITY-WIDE
COPS

PROGRAM
CHECK
229273
TOTAL:
06/30/2022
08192022
RPLC
BLIND
SHADES
-
FS
#50

MAINTENANCE
1,032.61 10,158
.20
10 ,158.20
1,815.12
331.33
2,146.45

8.85 8.85 61.17 61.17 264.00
6-232
·,.n
08/18/2022
11:31
anac
OT
Y
OF~rrl<AG~
~\\\\1
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
CHECK
RUN
CHECK
229274
TOTAL:
229275
08/19/2022
PRTD
2027

WASHINGTON

SPEAKERS

BUREAU,
INC.

WSBR-PI00009388
08/15/2022
08192022
Invoice:

WSBR-PI00009388
2024
RMWF

DEPOSIT
-
A

WENTWORTH
22,500.00
244
1230

PREPAID
ITEMS

WASHINGTON

SPEAKERS

BUREAU,
INC.

WSBR-PI00009461
08/17/2022
08192022
Invoice:

WSBR-PI00009461
2024
RMWF

DEPOSIT
- D
GERGEN
229276
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
002-26375
229277
08/19/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
3113923
25,000.00
244
1230

PREPAID
ITEMS
CHECK
229275
TOTAL:
776

WILLDAN

ENGINEERING
002-26375
05/03/2022
20230035
08192022

PORCUPINE

INSPECTION

SERVICES
PE
4/15/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
1761
WT.

COX
760.00
10122000
7400
148
.89
CHECK
229276
TOTAL:
3113923
08/15/2022
20230044
08192022
ONLINE

MAGAZINES
&

NEWPAPERS
E
LB
ELECT
-UNDEFINED
-UNDEFINED
-UNDEFINED
24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
NUMBER
OF
CHECKS
130
TOTAL

PRINTED
CHECKS
TOTAL
EFT'S
COUNT
88 42
CHECK
229277
TOTAL:
***
CASH

ACCOUNT
TOTAL***
AMOUNT
285,910.41 81,428.53
***
GRAND
TOTAL***
IP
27 apcshdsb
NET
264.00
22,500.00 25,000.00 47,500.00
760
.00
760
.00
148.89 148
.89
367,338.94 367,338.94
6-233
1r1 ~
~
08/25/2022 11:36
elijaha [City of Rancho Mirage

A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING

CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME INVOICE
4800 08/26/2022 EFT
Invoice : 103511CS
4801 08/26/2022 EFT
Invoice : 29539
4802 08/26/2022 EFT
Invoice: 7012022
Invoice: 7012022SJ
Invoice: 7012022SR
Invoice: 7012022WW
Invoice : 8012022
Invoice: 8012022SJ
Invoice : 80122022SR
Invoice: 8012022WW
4803 08/26/2022 EFT
Invoice: 162241
1698 CLEAN STREET INC
7,862 . 96 248
103511CS
7615
2314 CREATIVE LIGHTING & ELECTRICAL, 29539
249 . 50 24281000 7612
519 HYDER AND COMPANY 7012022
11,807.24 28100000 7400
HYDER AND COMPANY 7012022SJ
11,846 . 13 28600000 7400
HYDER AND COMPANY 7012022SR
6 , 460.15 28400000 7400
HYDER AND COMPANY 7012022WW
4,610.23 28300000 7400
HYDER AND COMPANY 8012022
11 , 807 . 24 28100000 7400
HYDER AND COMPANY 8012022SJ
11,846.13 28600000 7400
HYDER AND COMPANY 80122022SR
6,460 . 15 28400000 7400
HYDER AND COMPANY 8012022WW
4,610.23 28300000 7400
728 DBA MAXIMUM SECURITY ALARM SYSTEM 162241
118.00 24281000 7612

INV DATE

INVOICE DTL DESC
PO
~\'t.\\

CHECK RUN
07/31/2022 08262022
CITYWIDE STREET SWEEPING 7/31/22

STREET SWEEPING
CHECK 4800 TOTAL:
08/24/2022 20230013 08262022
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE - LIBRARY 8/23/22

MAINTENANCE
CHECK 4801 TOTAL:
07/01/2022 20230077 08262022
I
p 1
apcshdsb
NET
7,862.96
7,862.96
249.50
249.50
11,807.24
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SVCS - PARKVIEW VILLAS 7/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
07/01/2022 20230078 08262022 11,846.13
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SVCS - SAN JACINTO VILLAS 7/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
07/01/2022 20230079 08262022 6,460.15
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SVCS - SANTA ROSA VILLAS 7/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
07/01/2022 20230080 08262022 4,610.23
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SVCS - WHISPERING WATERS 7/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
08/01/2022 20230077 08262022 11,807.24
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SVCS - PARKVIEW VILLAS 8/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
08/01/2022 20230078 08262022 11,846.13
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SVCS -SAN JACINTO VILLAS 8/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
08/01/2022 20230079 08262022 6,460.15
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SVCS - SANTA ROSA VILLAS 8/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
08/01/2022 20230080 08262022 4,610.23
PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SVCS - WHISPERING WATERS 8/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK
08/22/2022
SERVICE PE 10/31/2022

MAINTENANCE
4802 TOTAL: 69 , 447.50
08262022 236 . 00
6-234
'"·
OTY~~i'l<AG~
08/25/2022
11:36
elijaha
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
4804
08/26/2022
EFT
Invoice:
162316
Invoice:
162318
Invoice:
162320
4805
08/26/2022
EFT
Invoice:
13341333
4806
08/26/2022
EFT
Invoice:
1182
4807
08/26/2022
EFT
Invoice:
39906
4808
08/26/2022
EFT
Invoice:
52925
Invoice:
52924
Invoice:
52049
118.00
24282000
7613
728
DBA

MAXIMUM

SECURITY
ALARM
SYSTEM
162316
327.20
24281000
7612
DBA

MAXIMUM

SECURITY
ALARM
SYSTEM
162318
228.88
24282000
7613
DBA

MAXIMUM

SECURITY
ALARM
SYSTEM
162320
276.08
24281000
7612
558
PFM
ASSET
MGMT
LLC
13341333
2877
SO
CAL
GRAFIX
5,420.62
10151000
7400
6,470.63
244
1182
7839
1664

SOUTHWEST

PLUMBING
INC
39906
1,856.37
24281000
7612
640
STEVEN
B

QUINTANILLA,
52925
24,674.50
10114000
7400
STEVEN
B

QUINTANILLA,
52924
7,253.12
10114000
7400
STEVEN
B

QUINTANILLA,
52049
37,908.32
10114000
7400
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
.. "\.\-.\\
CHECK
RUN

OBSERVATORY

MAINTENANCE CHECK
4803
TOTAL:
08/22/2022
08262022
RPLC
PANEL

BATTERIES
-

LIBRARY
8/22/22

MAINTENANCE
Ip
2 apcshdsb
NET
236.00 327.20
08/22/2022
08262022
228.88
RPLC
FIRE
SYSTEM

BATTERIES
-

LIBRARY
8/22/22

OBSERVATORY

MAINTENANCE
08/22/2022
08262022
RPLC
SENSOR

BATTERIES
-

LIBRARY
8/22/22

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
4804
TOTAL:
07/31/2022
08262022

INVESTMENT

SERVICES
7/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK
4805
TOTAL:
07/15/2022
20230086
08262022
2023
RMW
STREET

BANNERS

REPRODUCTION
&

PRINTING
CHECK
4806
TOTAL:
08/17/2022
08262022

PLUMBING

REPAIRS
-

LIBRARY
8/15/22

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
4807
TOTAL:
08/17/2022
08262022
LEGAL

SERVICES
PE
7/31/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
08/17/2022
08262022
LEGAL

SERVICES
PE
7/31/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
06/30/2022
08262022
LEGAL

SERVICES
PE
5/31/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
276.08 832.16
5,420.62 5,420.62 6,470.63 6,470.63 1,856.37 1,856.37 24,674.50 7,253.12 37,908.32 6-235
~l 08/25/2022
11:36
elijaha
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH

ACCOUNT
:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
OTV
~
~l'l<AG
~

INVOICE
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
~\\\\\
CHECK
RUN
Ip
3 apcshdsb
NET
STEVEN
B

QUINTANILLA,
52050
06 /30/2022
08262022
2,435.00
Invoice
:
52050
4809
08 /26
/2022
EFT
2849

SUNBELT

RENTALS
INC
Invoice:
125405972-0004

SUNBELT

RENTALS
INC
Invoice:
125437638-0004
2,435.00
1011
4000
7400
LEGAL

SERVICES
PE
5/31/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK
4808
TOTAL:
72,270
.94
125405972-0004
08/04
/2022
20230015
08262022
821
.21
CP
19-353:SECURITY
LIGHT
TOWER
-FS#50
7/25-8
/21
/22
821.21
357
9540

SEISMIC
&

BUILDING
UPGRD
ST#50
125437638-0004
08/04/2022
20230015
08262022
821.21
CP
19-353
:SECURITY
LIGHT
TOWER
-FS#50
7/25-8/21
/22
821.21
357
9540

SEISMIC
&

BUILDING
UPGRD
ST#50
CHECK
4809
TOTAL:
1,642.42
4810
08/26/2022
EFT
Invoice:
81126541
1542
WAXIE

SANITARY
SUPPLY
81126541
08/23/2022

JANITORIAL

SUPPLIES

SUPPLIES
08262022
119.12
119
.12
24281000
8000
CHEC
K
4810
TOTAL:
119
. 12
4811
08/26
/2022
EFT
Invoice:
010-52137
294

WILLDAN

FINANCIAL
SERVICES 3,352.00
702
010-52137
2470
08/19
/2022
08262022
3,352.00
PROF
SVCS
-
CFD
#4C
PE
7/31/21
(BOND

ISSUANCE)
CFD
#4

FORMATION

DEPOSIT
229278
08/26
/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
220528-01
1824
ACE

PRINTING
229279
08 /26/2022
PRTD
1592
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
439693996794
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
649999356437
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
864367579597
CHECK
4811
TOTAL:
3,352.00
220528-01
7839
05 /18/2022
20220278
08262022
4,816.45
4,816.45
243
PRINT
AND
MAIL

PROGRAM

BOOKLETS
-
SUMMER
2022

REPRODUCTION
&

PRINTING
CHECK
229278
TOTAL:
439693996794
06 /16
/2022
08262022
BOOKS

58.80 24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION

11.13 649999356437
CDS
06/18/2022
E
LB
ELECT
-UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
-UNDEFINED
24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
864367579597
CDS
06 /18
/2022
08262022 08262022
4,816
.45

58.80 11
.13

81.35 6-236
08/25/2022
11:36
elijaha
I City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH

ACCOUNT
:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DAT
E
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME AMAZON.COM
Invoice
:
997484847886
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
664978957899
AMAZON.COM
Invoice:
939634743456
OTV
Of~
PIMG~
~
~

81. 35

9.68 INVOICE
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
E
LB
ELECT
-UNDEFINED
-UNDEFINED
-UNDEFINED
24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
997484847886
CDS
06/18/2022
E
LB
ELECT
-UNDEFINED
-UNDEFINED
-UNDEFINED
24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
~\~\\
CHECK
RUN
08262022
664978957899
06/23/2022
08262022
BOOKS
200
.41
24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
939634743456
06/23/2022
08262022
BOOKS

19.75 24281000
7912

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
CHECK
229279
TO
TAL:
229280
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
76228
1376

AMERICAN

FORENSIC
NURSES
LLC
76228
07/22/2022
08262022
183.66
10141000
7400

AMERICAN

FORENSIC
NURSES
LLC
76303
Invoice:
76303
155
.83
10141000
7400
229281
08/26/2022
PRTD
395
AT&T
000018638218
Invoice:
000018638218
Invoice:
000018638833
Invoice:
000018638211
229282
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
2036934620
434.97
24281000
7821
AT&T
000018638833
167
.08
10151000
7821
AT&T
000018638211
1,133.26
10151000
7821
1691
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934620
15 .67
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934621
DUI

TESTING
PE
6/28/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
08/11/2022
08262022
DUI

TESTING
PE
7/18/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK
229280
TOTAL
:
08/13/2022
08262022

SERVICE
PE
8/12/22
(BAN
#9391019359)

TELEPHONE
08/13/2022
08262022

SERVICE
PE
8/12/22
(BAN
#9391020654)

TELEPHONE
08/13/2022
08262022

SERVICE
PE
8/12/22
(BAN
#9391019357)

TELEPHONE
CHECK
229281
TOTAL:
08/09
/2022
08262022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09/2022
08262022
Ip
4 apcshdsb
NET 9.68
200.41 19.75 381
.12
183
.66
155.83 339.49 434.97 167.08
1,133.26 1,735.31

15.67 8.56
6-237
~'"'"
OTYOf~rrl<AG~
~
z1
08/25/2022
11:36
elijaha
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
Invoice:
2036934621

8.56 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934622
Invoice:
2036934622

8.77 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934623
Invoice:
2036934623

19.76 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934624
Invoice:
2036934624

41.69 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934625
Invoice:
2036934625

22.66 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934626
Invoice:
2036934626

62.25 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934627
Invoice:
2036934627

25.89 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934628
Invoice:
2036934628

31.01 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934629
Invoice:
2036934629

91.28 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934630
Invoice:
2036934630
202.18
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947400
Invoice:
2036947400
822.09
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947401
Invoice:
2036947401
428.85
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934631
Invoice:
2036934631

8.83 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934632
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
BOOKS
PO

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/15/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/15/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09/2022
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09/2022
~\\.\\\
Ip
5 apcshdsb
CHECK
RUN
NET
08262022

8.77 08262022

19.76 08262022

41.69 08262022

22.66 08262022

62.25 08262022

25.89 08262022

31.01 08262022

91. 28
08262022
202.18
08262022
822.09
08262022
428.85
08262022

8.83 08262022

71.21 6-238
,1,1.

OT
Y
Of~~G~
08/25/2022
11 :36
elijaha
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
Invoice
:
2036934632
71 .21
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934633
Invoice:
2036934633

55.71 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036934634
Invoice:
2036934634

53.73 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947389
Invoice:
2036947389

16.29 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947390
Invoice:
2036947390

13.14 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947391
Invoice:
2036947391
12 .50
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947392
Invoice:
2036947392

36.20 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947393
Invoice
:
2036947393

29.69 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947394
Invoice:
2036947394
177.97
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947395
Invoice:
2036947395

22.66 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947396
Invoice
:
2036947396
67 .61
24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947397
Invoice
:
2036947397

17.08 24281000
7912
BAKER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947398
Invoice:
2036947398

4.75 24281000
7912
BA
KER
&
TAYLOR

ENTERTAINMENT
2036947399
~\\\\
Ip
6 apcshdsb
INV
DATE
PO
CHECK
RUN
NET

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08 /09
/2022
08262022
55 . 71
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/09
/2022
08262022

53.73 BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/15/2022
08262022
16 .29
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08 /15
/2022
08262022

13.14 BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08 /15
/2022
08262022
12 .50
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/15/2022
08262022

36.20 BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/15/2022
08262022
29 .69
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08 /15
/2022
08262022
177
.97
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08 /15
/2022
08262022
22 .66
BOO

KS FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08 /15
/2022
08262022

67.61 BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08/15/2022
08262022
17 .08
BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08 /15/2022
08262022

4.75 BOOKS

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
08 /15
/2022
08262022

99.48 6-239
,,1,1.
08/25/2022
11:36
elijaha
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
Invoice:
2036947399
OTVOF~~~
~
~ INVOICE
99 .48
24281000
7912
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
BOOKS
PO
-.\\\\\
CHECK
RUN

FOUNDATION
-

COLLECTION
CHECK
229282
TOTAL
:
229283
08/26/2022
PRTD
246

BURRTEC
WASTE
&

RECYCLING

SERVICE
44-BS
504328
07/202207/01/2022
08262022
Invoice:
44-BS
504328
07/2022

STORAGE
BOX
RENTAL
7/2022
214.60
10133310
7612

MAINTENANCE

BURRTEC
WASTE
&

RECYCLING

SERVICE
44-BS
504328
08/202208/01/2022
08262022
Invoice:
44-BS
504328
08/2022

STORAGE
BOX
RENTAL
8/2022
214
.60
10133310
7612

MAINTENANCE

BURRTEC
WASTE
&

RECYCLING

SERVICE
44-BS
535252
083122
08/01/2022
08262022
Invoice:
44-BS
535252
083122

CONSTRUCTION

STORAGE
BOX
-
FS
#50
PE
8/31/22
229284
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
73122
229285
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
5120698963
214.60
357
9540

SEISMIC
&

BUILDING
UPGRD
ST#50
246

BURRTEC
WASTE
&

RECYCLING

SERVICE
73122
432.00
251
7508
275
CINTAS

DOCUMENT

MANAGEMENT
5120698963
122.34
10133310
8000
CHECK
229283
TOTAL
:
07/31/2022
08262022

HHW/CLEAN

HARBORS
PE
7/31/22

HOUSEHOLD

HAZARDOUS
WASTE
CHECK
229284
TOTAL:
08/16/2022
08262022
FIRST
AID

SUPPLIES
-
CITY
YARD

SUPPLIES
CHECK
229285
TOTAL
:

Ip
7 apcshdsb
NET
2,467.51
214
.60
214.60 214.60 643.80 432
.00
432.00 122.34 122.34
229286
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
21-22Q4
2879
COUNTY
OF

RIVERSIDE
21-22Q4
06/30
/2022
20220279
08262022
11,250
.00
229287
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
0004803577
229288
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
910024324
11,250.00
21500000
7412
19 DESERT
SUN

PUBLISHING
CO
0004803577
403
EMCOR

SERVICE
1,276.00
10121000
7842
910024324
700.00
10133300
7612

EMERGENCY

SERVICES

COORDINATOR
SVCS
(APR-JUN
2022)
FIRE

SERVICES
CHECK
229286
TOTAL
:
11,250.00
08/01/2022
08262022
1,276
.00
PUBLIC
HEAR

NOTICES
PE
7/31/22
(ACCT
#231791)

ADVERTISING/PUBLISHING
CHECK
229287
TOTAL:
08/16/2022
20230020
08262022
RPR
BOILER

CONNECTION
-
CITY
HALL
8/11/22

MAINTENANCE
1,276.00
700.00
6-240
~mn 08/25/2022
11:36
elijaha
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
229289
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:

RANCHO#46
1513
ETECH-360
INC
~
~
INVOICE RANCHO#46
22,968.00
10156000
7400
229290
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
50494
110
FAMILY
YMCA
OF
THE
DESERT
50494
1,000
.00
10157000
7872
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
CHECK
PO
~\\\\\
CHECK
RUN
229288
TOTAL:
07/20
/2022
20230097
08262022
REMOTE

DATABASE

SERVICES

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK
08/23/2022

DONATION
PUBLIC

RELATIONS
229289
TOTAL:
08262022
CHECK
229290
TOTAL:
229291
08/26/2022
PRTD
2241
GLASS
BOX

TECHNOLOGY
RANCSOLA081922
08/19/2022
08262022
Invoice
:

RANCSOLA081922

SOFTWARE

RENEWAL
229292
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
703067108
229293
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
223749
Invoice:
223750
1,824
.93
10156000
7639

COMPUTER

MAINTENANCE
2564
HOME
DEPOT
USA,
INC
703067108
2,244
.39
10142000
8016
185

LIEBERT

CASSIDY

WHITMORE
223749

67.00 10154000
7400

LIEBERT

CASSIDY

WHITMORE
223750
1,108.30
10154000
7400
CHECK
229291
TOTAL:
08/23/2022
08262022
SHELF
UNIT
-

EMERGENCY

SUPPLIES

EMERGENCY

SUPPLIES
.

CHECK
229292
TOTAL:
07/31/2022
08262022
LEGAL

SERVICES
PE
7/31/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
07/31/2022
08262022
LEGAL

SERVICES
PE
7/31/22

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
CHECK
229293
TOTAL:

Ip
8 apcshdsb
NET
700.00
22,968.00 22,968
.00
1,000.00 1,000.00 1,824.93 1,824.93 2,244.39 2,244.39

67.00 1,108.30
1,175.30
229294
08/26/2022
PRTD
1670

MCCALLUM

THEATRE
CRM06022022
08/22/2022
08262022
25,000
.00
Invoice:

CRM06022022
FY
2022-2023

SPONSORSHIP
-
1ST

INSTALLMENT
25,000.00
10157000
7497

SPECIAL

CONTRIBUTIONS
CHECK
229294
TOTAL:
25,000.00
6-241
~1111""'
08/25/2022 11:36
elijaha I
City of Rancho Mirage

A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING

CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME
229295 08/26/2022 PRTD
Invoice: 61886
2028 PJ CASTORENA, INC.
125.99 600
229296 08/26/2022 PRTD 2852 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, LLC Invoice: 261881750001

INVOICE
61886
7842

INV DATE

INVOICE DTL DESC
PO
~\\\\

CHECK RUN
I
p 9
apcshdsb
NET
08/19/2022 08262022 125.99
RMEA MAILING NOTICES 00Nl/00N2 8/3/22 & 8/10/22

ADVERTISING/PUBLISHING
CHECK 229295 TOTAL: 125.99
261881750001 08/18/2022 08262022 263.93
263.93 24281000 8000

COFFEE SUPPLIES/PLATES/NAPKINS/DISINFECTING WIPES

SUPPLIES
229297 08/26/2022 PRTD 99999 ANDREW PIERCE CORPORATION
Invoice: 23479
229298 08/26/2022 PRTD 99999 ANOOK COMMANDEUR
Invoice: NEM20220929
229299 08/26/2022 PRTD 99999 AVETIS AVETIKYAN
Invoice: NEM20220304-2
229300 08/26/2022 PRTD 99999 BIJAN MOSHIRI
Invoice: NEM20220930
229301 08/26/2022 PRTD 99999 BONNIE HOHNSTEIN
Invoice: NEM20220931
2 , 760.00 702
321.80 600

82.73 600
61 . 97 600
42 . 64 600
23479
2455
CHECK 229296 TOTAL:
08/22/2022 08262022
REFUND DEPOSIT (PERMIT El800123)

MISCELLANEOUS DEPOSITS
CHECK 229297 TOTAL:

NEM20220929 08/25/2022 08262022

NET ENERGY METERING SURPLUS COMPENSATION
2653 NET ENERGY METERING LIABILITY
CHECK 229298 TOTAL:

NEM20220304-2 08/24/2022 08262022

NET ENERGY METERING SURPLUS COMPENSATION
2653 NET ENERGY METERING LIABILITY
CHECK 229299 TOTAL:

NEM20220930 08/25/2022 08262022

NET ENERGY METERING SURPLUS COMPENSATION
2653 NET ENERGY METERING LIABILITY
CHECK 229300 TOTAL:

NEM20220931 08/25/2022 08262022

NET ENERGY METERING SURPLUS COMPENSATION
2653 NET ENERGY METERING LIABILITY
CHECK 229301 TOTAL:
263.93
2,760.00
2,760.00
321 . 80
321. 80

82.73 82.73

61.97 61 . 97

42.64 42 . 64
6-242
~'"'
08/25/2022 11:36
elijaha I
City of Rancho Mirage

A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING

CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME
229302 08/26/2022 PRTD 99999 BRIAN MAUERMAN
Invoice: NEM20220932
229303 08/26/2022 PRTD 99999 CORBIN THOMAS
Invoice: NEM20220933
229304 08/26/2022 PRTD 99999 CORNELL TEOMAN
Invoice : NEM20220934
229305 08/26/2022 PRTD 99999 DAVID SLONE
Invoice: NEM20220935
229306 08/26/2022 PRTD 99999 DEANNE BLOOMQUIST
Invoice: 50472
229307 08/26/2022 PRTD 99999 DEBRA MANNING
Invoice: NEM20220936
229308 08/26/2022 PRTD 99999 DONNA ROTHACHER
Invoice : NEM20220937
OTY Of~ ri1RAG~
ts; ~

INVOICE
NEM20220932
331.64 600 2653
NEM20220933

86.41 600 2653
NEM20220934
310.20 600 2653
NEM20220935

14.50 600 2653
50472
124.00 10157000 7420
NEM20220936

8.52 600 2653
NEM20220937

68.75 600 2653

INV DATE

INVOICE DTL DESC
08/25/2022
PO
~\\\\1

CHECK RUN
08262022

NET ENERGY METERING SURPLUS COMPENSATION

NET ENERGY METERING LIABILITY
CHECK 229302 TOTAL:
08/25/2022 08262022

NET ENERGY METERING SURPLUS COMPENSATION

NET ENERGY METERING LIABILITY
CHECK 229303 TOTAL:
08/25/2022 08262022

NET ENERGY METERING SURPLUS COMPENSATION

NET ENERGY METERING LIABILITY
CHECK 229304 TOTAL:
08/25/2022 08262022

NET ENERGY METERING SURPLUS COMPENSATION

NET ENERGY METERING LIABILITY
CHECK
08/22/2022

ANIMAL ADOPTION PROGRAM

ANIMAL SERVICES
CHECK
08/25/2022
229305 TOTAL:
08262022
229306 TOTAL:
08262022

NET ENERGY METERING SURPLUS COMPENSATION

NET ENERGY METERING LIABILITY
CHECK 229307 TOTAL:
08/25/2022 08262022

NET ENERGY METERING SURPLUS COMPENSATION

NET ENERGY METERING LIABILITY
CHECK 229308 TOTAL:

I
P 10
apcshdsb
NET
331.64
331.64

86.41 86.41
310.20
310.20
14 . 50

14.50 124.00
124.00

8.52 8.52

68.75 68 . 75
6-243
)J..I
~
08/25/2022
11:36
elijaha
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH

ACCOUNT
:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
229309
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999

DOUGLAS

MORELAND
Invoice:

NEM20220938
229310
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
ERIC
GUTT
Invoice
:

NEM20220939
229311
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
GARY
YAVITZ
Invoice
:

NEM20220940
229312
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999

GEORGINA
MURRAY
Invoice:

NEM20220941
229313
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
GERALD
HOPE
Invoice:

NEM20220942
229314
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999

GUSTAVO
A

PAREDES
Invoice
:

NEM20220024-2
229315
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
GWEN
JACOBS
Invoice:

NEM20220194
-2
O
TY
Of~~~
IS;
z'.l INVOICE NEM20220938
503.30
600
2653
NEM20220939

21. 38
600
2653
NEM20220940

15.34 600
2653
NEM20220941

37.90 600
2653
NEM20220942

70.25 600
2653
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
08/25/2022
PO
..
\\.\\\
CHECK
RUN
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229309
TOTAL
:
08/25/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229310
TOTAL:
08 /25/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229311
TOTAL:
08/25/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILIT
Y
CHECK
229312
TOTAL:
08 /25
/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229313
TOTAL
:

NEM20220024-2
08/24/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
119.86
600
2653
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229314
TOTAL:

NEM20220194
-2
08/24/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
142.
71 600
2653
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229315
TOTAL:

Ip
11 apcshdsb
NET
503
.30
503.30 21.
38 21.
38 15.34 15
.34
37 .90
37 .90
70 .25
70 .25
119
. 86
119.
86 142.71 142.
71 6-244
~nm, 08/25/2022
11:36
elijaha
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME
229316
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999

JEFFREYS

HALPERN
Invoice:

NEM20220943
229317
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
JOHN
DAGRES
Invoice:

NEM20220944
229318
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
KEITH
SENN
Invoice:

NEM20220945
229319
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
LANA

VALKOVICH
Invoice:

NEM20220946
229320
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
LOIS

SLABACK
Invoice:

NEM20220947
229321
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
MARK

SANGIACOMO
Invoice
:

NEM20220948
229322
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999

MAUREEN

CROWSHAW
Invoice:

NEM20220949
OT
VOf~
~
INVOICE NEM20220943

55.96 600
2653
NEM20220944
288.77
600
2653
NEM20220945

97.14 600
2653
NEM20220946

23.18 600
2653
NEM20220947
140.98
600
2653
NEM20220948
1,944
.55
600
2653
NEM20220949

3.07 600
2653
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
08/25/2022
PO
~\,\\
CHECK
RUN
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229316
TOTAL:
08/25/2022
08262022
·
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229317
TOTAL:
08/25/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229318
TOTAL:
08/25/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229319
TOTAL:
08/25/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229320
TOTAL:
08/25/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229321
TOTAL:
08/25/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229322
TOTAL:

IP
12 apcshdsb
NET

55.96 55.
96 288.77 288
.77

97.14 97.14 23.18 23.18 140.
98 140.98
1,944
.55
1,944
.55

3.07 3.07
6-245
-
'J~.
08/25/2022
11:36
eli
jaha
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYP
E
VENDOR
NAME
229323
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
PHILIP
HIXON
Invoice:

NEM20220950
229324
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
PULTE
HOMES
Invoice:

NEM20220951
229325
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
RENEE
DORKS
Invoice:

NEM20220952
229326
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
ROBERT
E
RUBIN
Invoice:

NEM20220953
OTV~~lrl<AG~
['.,
~ INVOICE NEM20220950
196.83
600
2653
NEM20220951

21. 66
600
2653
NEM20220952
497.04
600
2653
NEM20220953

23.38 600
2653
229327
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999
VIOLET
MORANS
REVIVE
TEAM
LLC
NEM20220954
Invoice:

NEM20220954
491.91
600
2653
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
08/25/2022
PO
~\\\\\
CHECK
RUN
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229323
TOTAL:
08/25/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229324
TOTAL:
08/25/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229325
TOTAL:
08/25/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229326
TOTAL:
08/25/2022
08262022
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229327
TOTAL:
229328
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999

WILFREDO
LEBRON
NEM20220152-2
08/24/2022
08262022
Invoice:

NEM20220152-2
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
236
.39
600
2653
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229328
TOTAL:
229329
08/26/2022
PRTD
99999

WILLIAM
SCOTT
NEM20220955
08/25/2022
08262022
Invoice:

NEM20220955
NET
ENERGY

METERING

SURPLUS

COMPENSATION
152.65
600
2653
NET
ENERGY

METERING

LIABILITY
CHECK
229329
TOTAL:

IP
13 apcshdsb
NET
196
.83
196
.83

21.66 21.
66 497
.04
497.04 23.38 23.38 491.91 491.91 236.39 236.39 152
.65
152.65
6-246
>II.

OTVOf~
~
08/25/2022
11:36
elijaha
ICity
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH

ACCOUNT
:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
229330
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
344443
229331
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
816762
229332
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
23687
229333
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice
:
27603136
229334
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
50511
Invoice
:
50512
Invoice:
50513
Invoice:
50514
Invoice:
50515
Invoice:
50517
2779

PACIFIC
OFFICE

AUTOMATION
344443
809.15
10156000
8000
45 PALM

SPRINGS
MOTORS
INC
816762
75 .63
10133000
7624
2878
PANANA
LLC
5,000.00
107
23687
7872
2832

PEOPLEREADY
INC
27603136
2,728.08
10132000
7444
1812
PETTY
CASH
-ELIJAH
ALEMAN
50511

13.99 242
4226
PETTY

CASH-ELIJAH
ALEMAN
50512

14.81 24281000
7914
PETTY

CASH-ELIJAH
ALEMAN
50513

44.02 244
8000
PETTY

CASH-ELIJAH
ALEMAN
50514

4.79 24281000
8000
PETTY

CASH-ELIJAH
ALEMAN
50515

46.65 24282000
7891
PETTY

CASH-ELIJAH
ALEMAN
50517

9.89 24281000
8000
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
~\\\\1
CHECK
RUN
08/11/2022
20230098
08262022
COPIES
PE
8/11/22

SUPPLIES
CHECK
229330
TOTAL:
08/12/2022
08262022
SVC
-
FM09

FACILITIES
8/12/22

VEHICLE

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229331
TOTAL:

IP
14 apcshdsb
NET
809.15 809.15 75.63 75
.63
06/24/2022
20230090
08262022
5,000
.00
EVENT

PLANNING/ORGANIZATION
-
LUNAR

FESTIVAL
PUBLIC

RELATIONS
CHECK
229332
TOTAL:
08/23/2022
08262022
M
.

BEJARANO/
A.

PEREZ
PE
8/21/22

TEMPORARY
AGENCY

SERVICES
CHECK
229333
TOTAL:
04/15/2022
08262022
REIMB
LOST
&
FOUND
BOOK

LOST/DAMAGED
ITEMS
04/29/2022
08262022

SEASONAL
DECOR
FOR

CHILDRENS
ROOM

FOUNDATION
-

READING
CLUB
05/13/2022
08262022

SUPPLIES
FOR
RMWF
BOARD

MEETING

SUPPLIES
12/01/2021
08262022

DISTLLED
WATER
FOR
DISC

CLEANER

SUPPLIES
07/12/2022
08262022

REPLACEMENT
EYE
CUPS
FOR

TELESCOPES

OBSERVATORY

PROGRAMMING
07/26/2022
08262022

GREETING
CARDS
FOR

LIBRARY
STAFF

SUPPLIES
5,000.00 2,728.08 2,728.08
13 . 99

14.81 44
.02

4.79 46.65 9.89
6-247
-J~.

OTVOf~i'l<AG~
~
z'.l
~\\\\
08/25/2022
11:36
elijaha
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH
ACCOUNT:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
INV
DA
TE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
CHECK
RUN
Invoice
:
50519
Invoice:
50520
Invoice:
50521
Invoice:
50522
229335
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
00011346
PETTY

CASH-ELIJAH
ALEMAN
50519
16 .42
24281000
7914
PETTY

CASH-ELIJAH
ALEMAN
47 .89
50520
07/26/2022
08262022

REFRESHMENTS
-
TEEN

PROGRAM

FOUNDATION
-

READING
CLUB
08/03/2022
08262022

SUPPLIES
-
SUMMER

READING
CLUB
EVENT
E
LB
SRC
-UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
-UNDEFINED
24281000
7919

FOUNDATN-LITERARY
LEGACY
PETTY
CASH
-ELIJAH
ALEMAN
50521

11.94 24281000
8000
PETTY

CASH-ELIJAH
ALEMAN
50522
181
PLANT

MASTERS
INC
13 . 95
242
4226
00011346
150.00
24281000
7612
08/03/2022
08262022

SUPPLIES
-

SERVICE
DESK

SUPPLIES
08/05/2022
08262022

REIMBURSEMENT
FOR
LOST
&
FOUND
BOOK

LOST/DAMAGED
ITEMS
CHECK
08/24/2022
PLANT

SERVICE
8/2022

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229334
TOTAL:
08262022
229335
TOTAL:
229336
08/26/2022
PRTD
449
PLAZA
TOWING
22-0725-17613
08/11/2022
08262022
Invoice:
22-0725-17613
Invoice
:
22-0811-18039
229337
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
152299
229338
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
5903081522
PLAZA
TOWING
5 POWERS
AWARDS

SHERIFF
TOWING
7/25/22
100.00
10141000
7400

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
22 -0811-18039
08/11/2022
08262022

SHERIFF
TOWING
6/21/22
245.00
10141000
7400

PROFESSIONAL/TECHNICAL
152299
279.60
24281000
8000

56.57 10111000
8000
CHECK
229336
TOTAL:
08/02/2022
08262022
NAME
BADGE
-

OBSERVATORY/COUNCIL

SUPPLIES SUPPLIES
CHECK
229337
TOTAL:
61 SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
5903081522
08/16/2022
08262022
24 .98
201
7603

SERVICE
PE
8/15/22
(ACCT#
700099905903)

ELECTRICITY
IP
15 apcshdsb
NET

16.42 47.89 11.
94 13.
95 224
.35
150
.00
150.00 100.00 245
.00
345.00 336.17 336.17 24.98
6-248
'I.

OTV
Of~lrf<AG~
08/25/2022
11:36
elijaha
!City
of
Rancho
Mirage
A/P
CASH

DISBURSEMENTS

JOURNAL
CASH

ACCOUNT
:
999
1005

CHECKING
CHECK
NO
CHK
DATE
TYPE
VENDOR
NAME

INVOICE
Invoice:
7813081522
Invoice:
8732081422
Invoice:
6035081622
Invoice:
6603081822
229339
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
68187081722
229340
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
696067
229341
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
152796196

SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
7813081522

22.77 201
7603

SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
8732081422
112.46
206
7603

SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
6035081622
3,039.97
21500690
7603

SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
EDISON
COMPAN
6603081822
4,311.21
24281000
7603
62 SOUTHERN

CALIFORNIA
GAS

COMPANY
68187081722
169.19
24281000
7600
2872
TV

APPLIANCE
REPAIR
INC
696067
509
ULINE,
INC

95.00 21500500
7612
152796196
327.56
10172000
7494
INV
DATE

INVOICE
DTL
DESC
PO
~\\\\
CHECK
RUN
08/16/2022
08262022

SERVICE
PE
8/15/22
(ACCT#
700311337813)

ELECTRICITY
08/17/2022
08262022

SERVICE
PE
8/14/22
(ACCT#
700483708732)

ELECTRICITY
08/19/2022
08262022

SERVICE
PE
8/16/22
(ACCT#700100656035)

ELECTRICITY
08/23/2022
08262022

SERVICE
PE
8/18/22
(ACCT#
700301966603)

ELECTRICITY
CHECK
08/17/2022

SERVICE
PE
8/17/2022

NATURAL
GAS
CHECK
229338
TOTAL:
08262022
229339
TOTAL:
07/27/2022
08262022
RPR

REFRIGERATOR
-
FS
#50
7/27/22

MAINTENANCE
CHECK
229340
TOTAL:
08/18/2022
20230062
08262022
PALLET

RACKS/SHELVING
-

AMPHITHEATER

AMPHITHEATER

PROGRAMMING
CHECK
229341
TOTAL:
229342
08/26/2022
PRTD
2244
U.S.

BANK

CORPORATE

PAYMENT
SYSTE
5446

08.22.2022
08/22/2022
08262022
Invoice:
5446

08.22.2022

ACCOUNT
5446
PE
8/22/2022
9,634.25
242
2011
CAL
CARD
-
US
BANK
CHECK
229342
TOTAL:
308
VORTEX

INDUSTRIES
,
INC.
05-1599639
08/11/2022
08262022
IP
16 apcshdsb
NET

22.77 112.
46 3,039.97 4,311.21 7,511.39
169.19 169.19 95.00 95.00 327.56 327.56
9,634
.25
9,634.25
659
.00
229343
08/26/2022
PRTD
Invoice:
05-1599639
659.00
10133300
7612

AUTOMATIC
DOOR

RPRS/MAINT
-
CITY
HALL
7/20/22

MAINTENANCE
6-249
~'"'""'
08/25/2022 11:36
elijaha !
City of Rancho Mirage

A/P CASH DISBURSEMENTS JOURNAL
CASH ACCOUNT: 999 1005 CHECKING

CHECK NO CHK DATE TYPE VENDOR NAME
229344 08/26/2022 PRTD
Invoice: 3114158
Invoice : 3114159
1761 WT . COX
WT. COX
OTY~~i'II.A G~
[::, ~
"'-'\\\\\
6 , 938.41

25.76 INVOICE
3114158

INV DATE

INVOICE DTL DESC
CHECK

PO CHECK RUN
229343 TOTAL:
08/22/2022 20230044 08262022

ONLINE MAGAZINES & NEWPAPERS SUBSCRIPTIONS

E LB ELECT -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION - COLLECTION
3114159 08/22/2022 20230044 08262022

ONLINE MAGAZINES & NEWPAPERS SUBSCRIPTIONS

E LB ELECT -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED -UNDEFINED
24281000 7912 FOUNDATION - COLLECTION
CHECK 229344 TOTAL:
229345 08/26/2022 PRTD
Invoice: 22-48646
2881 WELTYS ENTERPRISES , INC
5,911.42 243
22-48646
7839
08/13/2022 20230101 08262022
QUARTERLY PROGRAM BOOKLETS SEPT - NOV 2022

REPRODUCTION & PRINTING
NUMBER OF CHECKS 80

TOTAL PRINTED CHECKS

TOTAL EFT ' S
COUNT
68 12
CHECK 229345 TOTAL:
*** CASH ACCOUNT TOTAL***
AMOUNT
129,004.33
169,760.22
*** GRAND TOTAL***
I
P 17
apcshdsb
NET
659.00
6,938.41

25.76 6,964.17
5,911.42
5,911.42
298,764 . 55
298,764.55
6-250
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE:

In accordance with the Property Management Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority ("Housing Authority") and Hyder & Company ("Hyder"), Hyder has issued payments on behalf of the Housing Authority.

We hereby accept as filed payments issued by Hyder on behalf of the Housing Authority for the period of April 1, 2022 - April 30, 2022:

Housing Authority - Parkview Villas $26,464.56
ordered paid as stated below.

Date: September 1, 2022
Mayor
DEMANDS\ DEMHSG
69-825 Highway 111 I Rancho Mirage I California 92270
760.324.4511
www .ranchomirageca .gov
6-251
Fund 281 - Parkview Villas
Expenses
7 400 Professional/Technical
7480 Transportation Program
7600 Natural Gas
7602 Cable
7603 Electricity
7606 Water
7612 Maintenance
7621 Street Related Repairs
7624 Vehicle Maintenance
7648 Property Tax/Assessment
7800 Mileage
7806 Meetings & Travel
7818 Dues & Subscriptions
7821 Telephone
7826 Internet Access & Service
7839 Reproduction & Printing
7851 Insurance & Bonds
8000 Supplies
8004 Repair & Maint Supplies
8012 Small Tools, Furn & Equip
8020 Uniforms
8700 Misc Expenditures
8703 Rent Credit I Loss of Use
8900 Furniture & Equip
605 .31
955.55
4,309.20
1,862.51
3,879.18
5,544.08

30.30 114.99
1,132.40
342.00
7,314.04
375.00
26,464.56
April 2022
6-252
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE:

In accordance with the Property Management Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority ("Housing Authority") and Hyder & Company ("Hyder"), Hyder has issued payments on behalf of the Housing Authority.

We hereby accept as filed payments issued by Hyder on behalf of the Housing Authority for the period of April 1, 2022 - April 30, 2022:

Housing Authority - Whispering Waters
ordered paid as stated below.

Date: September 1, 2022
Mayor
DEMANDS\DEMHSG
69-825 Highway 111 I Rancho Mirage I California 92270
760.324.4511
www . rancho mi rage ca .gov
$5,349.84
6-253
Fund 283 - Whispering Waters
Expenses
7212 Insurance Reimbursement
7400 Professional/Technical
7 480 Transportation Program
7600 Natural Gas
7602 Cable
7603 Electricity
7606 Water
7612 Maintenance
7621 Street Related Repairs
7624 Vehicle Maintenance
7648 Property Tax/Assessment
7800 Mileage
7806 Meetings & Travel
7818 Dues & Subscriptions
7821 Telephone
7826 Internet Access & Service
7839 Reproduction & Printing
7851 Insurance & Bonds
8000 Supplies
8004 Repair & Maint Supplies
8012 Small Tools, Furn & Equip
8020 Uniforms
8700 Misc Expenditures
8703 Rent Credit / Loss of Use
8900 Furniture & Equip
157.30
796.75
890 .00
1,047.42
122.58
1,517.35

15.99 145.40
325.05
332.00
5,349.84
April 2022
6-254
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE:

In accordance with the Property Management Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority ("Housing Authority") and Hyder & Company ("Hyder"), Hyder has issued payments on behalf of the Housing Authority .

We hereby accept as filed payments issued by Hyder on behalf of the Housing Authority for the period of April 1, 2022 - April 30, 2022:

Housing Authority - Santa Rosa Villas $6,602.50
ordered paid as stated below.

Date : September 1, 2022
Mayor
DEMANDS\DEMHSG
69- 825 Highway 111 I Rancho Mirage I California 92270
760.324.4511
www.ranchomirageca.gov
6-255
Fund 284 - Santa Rosa
Expenses
7400 Professional/Technical
7480 Transportation Program
7600 Natural Gas
7602 Cable
7603 Electricity
7606 Water
7612 Maintenance
7621 Street Related Repairs
7624 Vehicle Maintenance
7648 Property Tax/Assessment
7800 Mileage
7806 Meetings & Travel
7818 Dues & Subscriptions
7821 Telephone
7826 Internet Access & Service
7839 Reproduction & Printing
7851 Insurance & Bonds
8000 Supplies
8004 Repair & Maint Supplies
8012 Small Tools, Furn & Equip
8020 Uniforms
8700 Misc Expenditures
8703 Rent Credit I Loss of Use
8900 Furniture & Equip
155.70
(980 .66)
1,815.01
1,013 .50
(634.33)
3,373 .34
119.95
593.91

82.08 1,064 .00
6,602.50
April 2022
6-256
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE:

In accordance with the Property Management Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority ("Housing Authority") and Hyder & Company ("Hyder"), Hyder has issued payments on behalf of the Housing Authority.

We hereby accept as filed payments issued by Hyder on behalf of the Housing Authority for the period of April 1, 2022 - April 30, 2022:

Housing Authority - San Jacinto Villas $22,546.74
ordered paid as stated below.

Date : September 1, 2022
Mayor
DEMANDS\DEMHSG
69- 825 Highway 111 I Rancho Mirage I California 92270
760.324.4511
www.ranchomirageca.gov
6-257
Fund 286 - San Jacinto
Expenses
7400 Professional/Technical
7480 Transportation Program
7600 Natural Gas
7602 Cable
7603 Electricity
7606 Water
7612 Maintenance
7621 Street Related Repairs
7624 Vehicle Maintenance
7633 Office Equipment Maint
7648 Property Tax/Assessment
7800 Mileage
7806 Meetings & Travel
7818 Dues & Subscriptions
7821 Telephone
7826 Internet Access & Service
7839 Reproduction & Printing
7851 Insurance & Bonds
8000 Supplies
8004 Repair & Maint Supp lies
8012 Small Tools, Furn & Equip
8020 Uniforms
8220 Lease Payments
8700 Misc Expenditures
8703 Rent Credit I Loss of Use
8900 Furniture & Equip
Hyder
179.16
534.10
750.95
2,465.69
2,812 .64
8,007 .34
702.58
119.99
2,494.62
387 .67
3,550.00
542.00
22,546 .74
April 2022
6-258
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE:

In accordance with the Property Management Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority ("Housing Authority") and Hyder & Company ("Hyder"), Hyder has issued payments on behalf of the Housing Authority.

We hereby accept as filed payments issued by Hyder on behalf of the Housing Authority for the period of May 1, 2022 - May 31, 2022:

Housing Authority- Parkview Villas $28,549.94
ordered paid as stated below.

Date: September 1, 2022
Mayor
DEMANDS\DEMHSG
69-825 Highway 111 I Rancho Mirage I California 92270
760.324.4511
www.ranchomirageca.gov
6-259
Fund 281 - Parkview Villas
Expenses
7400 Professional/Technical
7480 Transportation Program
7600 Natural Gas
7602 Cable
7603 Electricity
7606 Water
7612 Maintenance
7621 Street Related Repairs
7624 Vehicle Maintenance
7648 Property Tax/Assessment
7800 Mileage
7806 Meetings & Travel
7818 Dues & Subscriptions
7821 Telephone
7826 Internet Access & Service
7839 Reproduction & Printing
7851 Insurance & Bonds
8000 Supplies
8004 Repair & Maint Supplies
8012 Small Tools, Furn & Equip
8020 Uniforms
8700 Misc Expenditures
8703 Rent Credit I Loss of Use
8900 Furniture & Equip
112.03

75.06 4,480.33
2,473.03
3,755 .13
5,787.48

30.30 114.99
1,263 .54
774.78
9,400.00
(91 .73)
375.00
28,549.94
May 2022
6-260
CITY 0~ RANCHO MIRAGE:

In accordance with the Property Management Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority ("Housing Authority") and Hyder & Company ("Hyder"), Hyder has issued payments on behalf of the Housing Authority.

We hereby accept as filed payments issued by Hyder on behalf of the Housing Authority for the period of May 1, 2022 - May 31, 2022:

Housing Authority - Whispering Waters $7,648.79
ordered paid as stated below.

Date: September 1, 2022
Mayor
DEMANDS\DEMHSG
69-825 Highway 111 I Rancho Mirage I California 92270
760.324.4511
www.ranchomirageca.gov
6-261
Fund 283 - Whispering Waters
Expenses
7212 Insurance Reimbursement
7400 Professional/Technical
7480 Transportation Program
7600 Natural Gas
7602 Cable
7603 Electricity
7606 Water
7612 Maintenance
7621 Street Related Repairs
7624 Vehicle Maintenance
7648 Property Tax/Assessment
7800 Mileage
7806 Meetings & Travel
7818 Dues & Subscriptions
7821 Telephone
7826 Internet Access & Service
7839 Reproduction & Printing
7851 Insurance & Bonds
8000 Supplies
8004 Repair & Maint Supplies
8012 Small Tools, Furn & Equip
8020 Uniforms
8700 Misc Expenditures
8703 Rent Credit / Loss of Use
8900 Furniture & Equip
112.20
824.83
890 .00
1,392.87
175.67
1,467 .18

30.30 114.99
945 .51
201 .19
1,162.05
332.00
7,648 .79
May 2022
6-262
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE:

In accordance with the Property Management Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority ("Housing Authority") and Hyder & Company ("Hyder"), Hyder has issued payments on behalf of the Housing Authority.

We hereby accept as filed payments issued by Hyder on behalf of the Housing Authority for the period of May 1, 2022 - May 31, 2022:

Housing Authority - Santa Rosa Villas $16,850.95
ordered paid as stated below.

Date: September 1, 2022
Mayor
DEMANDS\DEMH SG
69- 825 Highway 111 I Rancho Mirage I California 92270
760.324.4511
www .ra nchom irageca .gov
6-263
Fund 284 - Santa Rosa
Expenses
7400 Professional/Technical
7480 Transportation Program
7600 Natural Gas
7602 Cable
7603 Electricity
7606 Water
7612 Maintenance
7621 Street Related Repairs
7624 Vehicle Maintenance
7648 Property Tax/Assessment
7800 Mileage
7806 Meetings & Travel
7818 Dues & Subscriptions
7821 Telephone
7826 Internet Access & Service
7839 Reproduction & Printing
7851 Insurance & Bonds
8000 Supplies
8004 Repair & Maint Supplies
8012 Small Tools, Furn & Equip
8020 Uniforms
8700 Misc Expenditures
8703 Rent Credit I Loss of Use
8900 Furniture & Equip
114.30
(509.05)
1,878 .66
1,260.37
1,375 .51
6,719.20
148.01
119.95
1,467 .30
224 .64
2,988 .06
1,064.00
16,850.95
May 2022
6-264
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE:

In accordance with the Property Management Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority ("Housing Authority") and Hyder & Company ("Hyder"), Hyder has issued payments on behalf of the Housing Authority .

We hereby accept as filed payments issued by Hyder on behalf of the Housing Authority for the period of May 1, 2022 - May 31, 2022:

Housing Authority - San Jacinto Villas $25,926.52
ordered paid as stated below.

Date: September 1, 2022
Mayor
DEMANDS\DEMHSG
69- 825 Highway 111 I Rancho Mirage I California 92270
760.324.4511
www.ranchomirageca.gov
6-265
Fund 286 - San Jacinto
Expenses
7 400 Professional/Technical
7 480 Transportation Program
7600 Natural Gas
7602 Cable
7603 Electricity
7606 Water
7612 Maintenance
7621 Street Related Repairs
7624 Vehicle Maintenance
7633 Office Equipment Maint
7648 Property Tax/Assessment
7800 Mileage
7806 Meetings & Travel
7818 Dues & Subscriptions
7821 Telephone
7826 Internet Access & Service
7839 Reproduction & Printing
7851 Insurance & Bonds
8000 Supplies
8004 Repair & Maint Supplies
8012 Small Tools, Furn & Equip
8020 Uniforms
8220 Lease Payments
8700 Misc Expenditures
8703 Rent Credit / Loss of Use
8900 Furniture & Equip
Hyder
164.97
817.36
777.50
3,741.35
3,505 .96
8,385.41
663.42
119.99
2,518.23
196.45
4,493.88
542 .00
25,926.52
May 2022
6-266
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE:

In accordance with the Property Management Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority ("Housing Authority") and Hyder & Company ("Hyder"), Hyder has issued payments on behalf of the Housing Authority.

We hereby accept as filed payments issued by Hyder on behalf of the Housing Authority for the period of June 1, 2022 - June 30, 2022:

Housing Authority- Parkview Villas $34,284.87
ordered paid as stated below.

Date: September 1, 2022
Mayor
DEMANDS\DEMHSG
69-825 Highway 111 I Rancho Mirage I California 92270
760.324.4511
www.ranchomirageca.gov
6-267
Fund 281 - Parkview Villas
Expenses
7400 Professional/Technical
7480 Transportation Program
7600 Natural Gas
7602 Cable
7603 Electricity
7606 Water
7612 Maintenance
7621 Street Related Repairs
7624 Vehicle Maintenance
7648 Property Tax/Assessment
7800 Mileage
7806 Meetings & Travel
7818 Dues & Subscriptions
7821 Telephone
7826 Internet Access & Service
7839 Reproduction & Printing
7851 Insurance & Bonds
8000 Supplies
8004 Repair & Maint Supplies
8012 Small Tools, Furn & Equip
8020 Uniforms
8700 Misc Expenditures
8703 Rent Credit I Loss of Use
8900 Furniture & Equip
3,880.30
(1,051.52)
4,480 .33
3,452.33
5,955 .87
7,696.83

62.32 30.30
114.99
3,074.01
296.24
5,917.87
375.00
34,284 .87
June 2022
6-268
CITV OF RANCHO MIRAGE:

In accordance with the Property Management Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority ("Housing Authority") and Hyder & Company ("Hyder"), Hyder has issued payments on behalf of the Housing Authority .

We hereby accept as filed payments issued by Hyder on behalf of the Housing Authority for the period of June 1, 2022 - June 30, 2022:

Housing Authority - Whispering Waters $10,445.66
ordered paid as stated below .

Date: September 1, 2022
Mayor
DEMANDS\DEMHSG
69- 825 Highway 111 I Rancho Mirage I California 92270
760.324.4511
www.ranchomirageca.gov
6-269
Fund 283 - Whispering Waters
Expenses
7212 Insurance Reimbursement
7400 Professional/Technical
7 480 Transportation Program
7600 Natural Gas
7602 Cable
7603 Electricity
7606 Water
7612 Maintenance
7621 Street Related Repairs
7624 Vehicle Maintenance
7648 Property Tax/Assessment
7800 Mileage
7806 Meetings & Travel
7818 Dues & Subscriptions
7821 Telephone
7826 Internet Access & Service
7839 Reproduction & Printing
7851 Insurance & Bonds
8000 Supplies
8004 Repair & Maint Supplies
8012 Small Tools, Furn & Equip
8020 Uniforms
8700 Misc Expend itures
8703 Rent Credit I Loss of Use
8900 Furniture & Equip
1,373.65
476.03
890.00
1,900.80
166.27
2,877.35
114.99
529.98
622.54
1,162.05
332.00
10,445.66
June 2022
6-270
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE:

In accordance with the Property Management Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority ("Housing Authority") and Hyder & Company ("Hyder"), Hyder has issued payments on behalf of the Housing Authority.

We hereby accept as filed payments issued by Hyder on behalf of the Housing Authority for the period of June 1, 2022 - June 30, 2022:

Housing Authority- Santa Rosa Villas $12,568.21
ordered paid as stated below.

Date: September 1, 2022
Mayor
DEMANDS\DEMHSG
69-825 Highway 111 I Rancho Mirage I California 92270
760.324.4511
www.ranchomirageca.gov
6-271
Fund 284 - Santa Rosa
Expenses
7400 Professional/Technical
7 480 Transportation Program
7600 Natural Gas
7602 Cable
7603 Electricity
7606 Water
7612 Maintenance
7621 Street Related Repairs
7624 Vehicle Maintenance
7648 Property Tax/Assessment
7800 Mileage
7806 Meetings & Travel
7818 Dues & Subscriptions
7821 Telephone
7826 Internet Access & Service
7839 Reproduction & Printing
7851 Insurance & Bonds
8000 Supplies
8004 Repair & Maint Supplies
8012 Small Tools, Furn & Equip
8020 Uniforms
8700 Misc Expenditures
8703 Rent Credit / Loss of Use
8900 Furniture & Equip
1,586.11
200.55
1,878.66
2,306 .56
1,392 .35
308.25
119.95
3,205 .20
506.58
1,064.00
12,568.21
June 2022
6-272
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE:

In accordance with the Property Management Agreement by and between the City of Rancho Mirage Housing Authority ("Housing Authority") and Hyder & Company ("Hyder"), Hyder has issued payments on behalf of the Housing Authority.

We hereby accept as filed payments issued by Hyder on behalf of the Housing Authority for the period of June 1, 2022 - June 30, 2022:

Housing Authority - San Jacinto Villas $30,377.90
ordered paid as stated below.

Date: September 1, 2022
Mayor
DEMANDS\DEMHSG
69-825 Highway 111 I Rancho Mirage I California 92270
760.324.4511
www.ranchomirageca.gov
6-273
Fund 286 - San Jacinto
Expenses
7400 Professional/Technical
7480 Transportation Program
7600 Natural Gas
7602 Cable
7603 Electricity
7606 Water
7612 Maintenance
7621 Street Related Repairs
7624 Vehicle Maintenance
7633 Office Equipment Maint
7648 Property Tax/Assessment
7800 Mileage
7806 Meetings & Travel
7818 Dues & Subscriptions
7821 Telephone
7826 Internet Access & Service
7839 Reproduction & Printing
7851 Insurance & Bonds
8000 Supplies
8004 Repair & Maint Supplies
8012 Small Tools, Furn & Equip
8020 Uniforms
8220 Lease Payments
8700 Misc Expenditures
8703 Rent Credit I Loss of Use
8900 Furniture & Equip
Hyder
3,621.48
219.95
777 .50
4,226.97
3,723 .52
6,516.69
784.62
119.99
931.08
164.93
8,749.17
542.00
30,377.90
June 2022
7-1
CITY OF~ MIRAG~
~ ~

STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: September 1, 2022
FROM: Leland E. Cole, P.E., P.L.S., City Engineer
SUBJECT: Final Acceptance of Improvements for Tract Map No. 36809-2 (Del Webb Rancho Mirage)

SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council accept the public and private improvements for Tract Map No. 36809-2 as completed and authorize the filing of the Notice of Acceptance and the Notice of Completion with the County Recorder's Office.

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION
The developer, Pulte Homes, has constructed 160 residential lots, private streets, and landscaped common areas as part of the subdivision's second phase. The subdivision's Phase 2 is generally located in the southeastern-most area of TM 36809, north of Dinah Shore Drive and east of Los Alamos Road, as shown on the attached vicinity map.

The developer has completed the on-site (private) improvements in accordance with the plans and specifications and the requirements of the Tentative Map. The on-site improvements are now ready for acceptance by the City.

It is recommended that the City Council accept the public and private improvements as complete and authorize staff to file the Notice of Acceptance and Notice of Completion.

ATTACHMENT(S):

1. Vicinity Map

2. Notice of Acceptance

3. Notice of Completion
AGENDA ITEM#
7-2
ATTACHMENT 1

VICINITY MAP
(See attached)
7-3
TRACT MAP NO. 36809-2
30TH AVENUE
_,
_, LIJ
~~ Cl:'.
<t:: a a
36809-1
~
ii2 a
LIJ Q_

GERALD FORD DRIVE
0 :r:
•
HIGHWAY 111

VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.
co
0 co

FRANK SINATRA
>­LIJ
Cl:'.
~
2:
0 ~
DRIVE
:s
2 Cl:'.
0 Q_
LIJ
::i
2:
~
<(
~LA~~G~~~N~~E~Jcl>~~,s~~ES·c ~
34200 BOB HOPE DRIVE, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270
760.320.9811 MSACONSULTINGINC.COM
J. N. 2031 SHEET 1 OF 1
7-4
ATTACHMENT 2

NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE
(See attached)
7-5
Recording requested by and
when recorded mail to:

City Clerk
City of Rancho Mirage
69825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
No fee

NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE
Notice is hereby given that the following public improvements have been completed and accepted by the City of Rancho Mirage City Council on September 1, 2022.

Description of Work:

Tract Map No. 36809-2 (Pulte): Map Book 460, Pages 78-85 Owner/Developer:

Pulte Homes
27401 Los Altos, Suite 400
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Nature of Interest:

In Fee
The labor and material security (payment bond) shall be retained in full value for six months from the date of this acceptance.

This Notice of Acceptance is executed under authority of a directive from the City Council of the City of Rancho Mirage.

I, Leland E. Cole, declare under the penalty of perjury that I am the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Mirage, that I am familiar with the facts stated in the foregoing Notice of Acceptance executed for and on its behalf, and that I have read the foregoing Notice of Acceptance and know the contents thereof to be true.

DATED: September 1, 2022
Leland E. Cole, P.E., P.L.S
City Engineer
City of Rancho Mirage
State of California
County of Riverside
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

On September 1, 2022, before me, Cynthia Marie Stoddard, Notary Public, personally appeared Leland E. Cole, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person or entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature ________________ _
Signature of Notary Public
7-6
ATTACHMENT 3

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(See attached)
7-7
Recording requested by and
when recorded mail to:

City Clerk
City of Rancho Mirage
69825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
No fee

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Notice is hereby given that the following subdivision 's private improvements have been accepted as complete by the CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE on September 1, 2022 .

Description of Work:

Tract Map No. 36809-2 (Pulte): Map Book 460, Pages 78-85 Owner/Developer:

Pulte Homes
27401 Los Altos , Suite 400
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Nature of Interest:

In Fee
Pursuant to Section 16.20.090 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code , the labor and material security (payment bond) shall be retained in full value for six months from the date of this acceptance.

This Notice of Completion is executed under authority of a directive from the CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE .

I, Leland E. Cole, declare under penalty of perjury that I am the City Engineer of the CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE , that I am familiar with the facts stated in the foregoing Notice of Completion executed for and on its behalf, and that I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof to be true.

DA TED: September 1, 2022
Leland E. Cole, P.E., P.L.S.

City Engineer
City of Rancho Mirage
State of California
County of Riverside
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy , or validity of that document.

On September 1, 2022, before me, Cynthia Stoddard, Notary Public, personally appeared Leland E. Cole, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person or entity upon behalf of which the person acted , executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature ___ _ ______ _____ __ _
Signature of Notary Public
8-1

STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: September 1, 2022
FROM: Leland E. Cole, P.E., P.L.S., City Engineer
SUBJECT: Final Acceptance of Improvements for Tract Map No. 36809-3 (Del Webb Rancho Mirage)

SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council accept the public and private improvements for Tract Map No. 36809-3 as completed and authorize the filing of the Notice of Acceptance and the Notice of Completion with the County Recorder's Office.

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION
The developer, Pulte Homes, has constructed 108 residential lots, private streets, and landscaped common areas as part of the subdivision's third phase. The subdivision's Phase 3 is generally located in the westernmost area of TM 36809, north of Dinah Shore Drive and east of Los Alamos Road, as shown on the attached vicinity map.

The developer has completed the on-site (private) improvements in accordance with the plans and specifications and the requirements of the Tentative Map. The on-site improvements are now ready for acceptance by the City.

It is recommended that the City Council accept the public and private improvements as complete and authorize staff to file the Notice of Acceptance and Notice of Completion.

ATTACHMENT(S):

1. Vicinity Map

2. Notice of Acceptance

3. Notice of Completion
AGENDA ITEM#
8-2
ATTACHMENT 1

VICINITY MAP
(See attached)
8-3
TRACT MAP NO. 36809-3
30TH AVENUE
--J
--J UJ
~~ O:'.
<( a a
36809-1
~
o2 a
UJ
ct.

UJ
:::i
:z:
~
<(

GERALD FORD DRIVE
0 ::r:
8 VICINITY MAP
N.T.S.

HIGHWAY 111
co
0 co

FRANK SINATRA
>­UJ
O:'.

I::! :z:
0 <
DRIVE
<(
--J
g
O:'.
0 ct.

UJ
:::i
:z:
~
<(
~LA~!G':=~~N~~E~Jcl>~~,s~~ES·G (ffi;)
34200 BOB HOPE DRIVE, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270
760.320.9871 MSACONSULTINGINC.COM
J.N. 2031 SHEET 1 OF 1
8-4
ATTACHMENT 2

NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE
(See attached)
8-5
Recording requested by and
when recorded mail to:

City Clerk
City of Rancho Mirage
69825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
No fee

NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE
Notice is hereby given that the following public improvements have been completed and accepted by the City of Rancho Mirage City Council on September 1, 2022.

Description of Work:

Tract Map No. 36809 -3 (Pulte): Map Book 466, Pages 54-60 Owner/Developer:

Pulte Homes
27401 Los Altos, Suite 400
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Nature of Interest:

In Fee
The labor and material security (payment bond) shall be retained in full value for six months from the date of this acceptance .

This Notice of Acceptance is executed under authority of a directive from the City Council of the City of Rancho Mirage.

I, Leland E. Cole, declare under the penalty of perjury that I am the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Mirage, that I am familiar with the facts stated in the foregoing Notice of Acceptance executed for and on its behalf, and that I have read the foregoing Notice of Acceptance and know the contents thereof to be true.

DA TED: September 1, 2022
Leland E. Cole, P.E., P.L.S
City Engineer
City of Rancho Mirage
State of California
County of Riverside
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

On September 1, 2022, before me, Cynthia Marie Stoddard, Notary Public, personally appeared Leland E. Cole, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person or entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature ________________ _
Signature of Notary Public
8-6
ATTACHMENT 3

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(See attached)
8-7
Recording requested by and
when recorded mail to:

City Clerk
City of Rancho Mirage
69825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
No fee

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Notice is hereby given that the following subdivision's private improvements have been accepted as complete by the CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE on September 1, 2022.

Description of Work:

Tract Map No. 36809-3 (Pulte): Map Book 466, Pages 54-60 Ownerilleveloper:

Pulte Homes
27401 Los Altos, Suite 400
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Nature of Interest:

In Fee
Pursuant to Section 16.20.090 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, the labor and material security (payment bond) shall be retained in full value for six months from the date of this acceptance.

This Notice of Completion is executed under authority of a directive from the CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE.

I, Leland E. Cole, declare under penalty of perjury that I am the City Engineer of the CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE , that I am familiar with the facts stated in the foregoing Notice of Completion executed for and on its behalf, and that I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof to be true.

DA TED : September 1, 2022
Leland E. Cole, P.E., P.L.S.

City Engineer
City of Rancho Mirage
State of California
County of Riverside
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

On September 1, 2022, before me, Cynthia Marie Stoddard, Notary Public, personally appeared Leland E. Cole, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknow !edged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person or entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature ______________ ~---
Signature ofNotary Public
9-1

STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: September 1, 2022
FROM: Leland E. Cole, P.E., P.L.S., City Engineer
SUBJECT: Final Acceptance of Improvements for Tract Map No. 36809-4 (Del Webb Rancho Mirage)

SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that City Council accept the public and private improvements for Tract Map No. 36809-4 as completed and authorize the filing of the Notice of Acceptance and the Notice of Completion with the County Recorder's Office.

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION
The developer, Pulte Homes, has constructed 199 residential lots, private streets including Del Webb Way, and landscaped common areas as part of the subdivision's fourth phase. The subdivision's Phase 4 is generally located in the northwestern-most area of TM 36809, north of Dinah Shore Drive and east of Los Alamos Road, as shown on the attached vicinity map.

The developer has completed the on-site (private) improvements in accordance with the plans and specifications and the requirements of the Tentative Map. The on-site improvements are now ready for acceptance by the City.

It is recommended that the City Council accept the public and private improvements as complete and authorize staff to file the Notice of Acceptance and Notice of Completion.

ATTACHMENT($):

1. Vicinity Map

2. Notice of Acceptance

3. Notice of Completion
AGENDA ITEM#
9-2
ATTACHMENT 1

VICINITY MAP
(See attached)
9-3
TRACT MAP NO. 36809-4
30TH AVENUE

CITY OF

CATHEDRAL
CITY
....J
....J lJ.J
~~ a:::
<( a a

GERALD FORD DRIVE

CITY OF

RANCHO MIRAGE
lJ.J
a..
0 J:
co
0 co

FRANK SINATRA
lJ.J
::i
z
~
<(
DRIVE
lJ.J
::i
z
~
<(
HIGHWAY 111
>­UJ
a:::
~
z
0 :5 Q

VICINITY MAP
N.T.S. <
a:::
0 a..

MSA CONSULTING, INC.@;)
>PLANNING> CIVIL ENGINEERING> LAND SURVEYING
34200 808 HOPE DRIVE, RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270
760.320 .9811 MSACONSULTINGINC.COM
J.N. 2031 SHEET 1 OF 1
9-4
ATTACHMENT 2

NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE
(See attached)
9-5
Recording requested by and
when recorded mail to:

City Clerk
City of Rancho Mirage
69825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
No fee

NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE
Notice is hereby given that the following public improvements have been completed and accepted by the City of Rancho Mirage City Council on September 1, 2022.

Description of Work:

Tract Map No. 36809-4 (Pulte): Map Book 468, Pages 33-44 Owner/Developer:

Pulte Homes
27401 Los Altos, Suite 400
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Nature oflnterest:

In Fee
The labor and material security (payment bond) shall be retained in full value for six months from the date of this acceptance.

This Notice of Acceptance is executed under authority of a directive from the City Council of the City of Rancho Mirage.

I, Leland E. Cole, declare under the penalty of perjury that I am the City Engineer of the City of Rancho Mirage, that I am familiar with the facts stated in the foregoing Notice of Acceptance executed for and on its behalf, and that I have read the foregoing Notice of Acceptance and know the contents thereof to be true.

DA TED: September 1, 2022
Leland E. Cole, P.E., P.L.S
City Engineer
City of Rancho Mirage
State of California
County of Riverside
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

On September 1, 2022, before me, Cynthia Marie Stoddard, Notary Public, personally appeared Leland E. Cole, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person or entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature ________________ _
Signature of Notary Public
9-6
ATTACHMENT 3

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
(See attached)
9-7
Recording requested by and
when recorded mail to:

City Clerk
City of Rancho Mirage
69825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
No fee

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
Notice is hereby given that the following subdivision's private improvements have been accepted as complete by the CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE on September 1, 2022.

Description of Work:

Tract Map No. 36809-4 (Pulte): Map Book 468, Pages 33-44 Ownerilleveloper:

Pulte Homes
27401 Los Altos, Suite 400
Mission Viejo, CA 92691
Nature of Interest:

In Fee
Pursuant to Section 16.20.090 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, the labor and material security (payment bond) shall be retained in full value for six months from the date of this acceptance.

This Notice of Completion is executed under authority of a directive from the CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE.

I, Leland E. Cole, declare under penalty of perjury that I am the City Engineer of the CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, that I am familiar with the facts stated in the foregoing Notice of Completion executed for and on its behalf, and that I have read the foregoing Notice of Completion and know the contents thereof to be true.

DA TED : September 1, 2022
Leland E. Cole, P.E., P.L.S.

City Engineer
City of Rancho Mirage
State of California
County of Riverside
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

On September 1, 2022, before me, Cynthia Marie Stoddard, Notary Public, personally appeared Leland E. Cole, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument, the person or entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.

Signature _____________ ____ _
Signature of Notary Public
10-1

STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: September 1, 2022
FROM: Joy Tsai, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0002 & Tentative Tract Map Case No.

TTM22-0001 (TTM38291) - Section 31 Phases 1 B & 1 C

SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council:

A. Approve the Filing of a Notice of Exemption Based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0002 and Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15182 for Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan; and B. Approve Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM22-0001 (TTM38291 ), Subject to the Conditions of Approval and Based on the Content and Findings in the Staff Report .

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION

PROJECT SUMMARY
The applicant, Paul Depalatis of MSA Consulting, Inc., and owner, EC Rancho Mirage Holdings Limited Partnership, are requesting approval for the subdivision of four (4) parcels totaling 70.44 acres within the Section 31 Specific Plan located at the southwest corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive ("Project") .

The entitlement package includes the following applications: Environmental Assessment (EA) and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) to subdivide the subject property into 187 single-family residential lots, 4 remainder lots, as well as lots for open space and recreational amenities, private streets, and a Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) well site. Access to the future residential lots is proposed by extending the private street system approved in Phase 1A (Tract Map No. 37856) and is in conformance with the Section 31 Specific Plan. The CVWD well site will have direct access from Gerald Ford Drive. No new vertical development is being proposed in conjunction with the subject request.

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
On July 14, 2022, the Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Project. Four members of the public spoke during the public hearing. Concerns raised included water supply, affordable housing, and the installation of utilities. No public comments AGENDA ITEM#
10-2
DATE: September 1, 2022
EA22-0002, TTM22-0001 (TTM38291)

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED

Page 2 of 3 ends

were received regarding the subdivision design, grading, circulation, conceptual landscape plan, and visual impacts. Staff confirmed that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was adopted and certified with the approval of the Section 31 Specific Plan in 2019, which the subject application is implementing. No changes to the original Specific Plan entitlements have been proposed with this request. The Planning Commission staff report, and draft minutes are included as Attachments 4 and 5.

After due consideration of the staff report, presentation, and public testimony, the Planning Commission made the following motion:

MOVED/SECONDED BY GREY/BRYANT TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL:

1. THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CASE NO. EA22-0002 AND PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15182 FOR PROJECTS PURSUANT TO A SPECIFIC PLAN; AND,

2. APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CASE NO. TTM22-0001 (TTM38291 ),

SUBJECT TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND BASED ON THE CONTENT AND FINDINGS IN THE STAFF REPORT.

MOTION CARRIED 5/0.

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
This Project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). No potential new impacts related to the proposed project have been identified that would necessitate further environmental review beyond the impacts and issues disclosed and evaluated under the certified Section 31 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), State Clearinghouse Number (SCH No. 2018081074). The City Council passed Resolution No. 2019- 65 to adopt Findings of Fact, approve the Statement of Overriding Considerations, and certify the Section 31 Final EIR on December 5, 2019.

Under Government Code Section 65457, and in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, where a public agency has prepared an EIR on a specific plan after January 1, 1980, certain residential, commercial, and mixed-use projects undertaken pursuant to and in conformity to that specific plan are exempt from CEQA if the project meets the requirements of State CEQA Guidelines Section 15182(c). Residential projects covered by this section include but are not limited to land subdivisions, zoning changes, and residential planned unit developments. The subject Tentative Tract Map proposes the subdivision of 70.44 gross acres into 187 single-family residential lots, 4 remainder lots, as well as associated landscaping and on-site improvements, consistent with the Specific Plan. The effects of the implementation of the Section 31 Specific Plan, as implemented by the proposed Tentative Tract Map, were examined in the EIR and all feasible mitigation measures and alternatives developed and AGENDA ITEM#
10-3
DATE: September 1, 2022
EA22-0002, TTM22-0001 (TTM38291)

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED

Page 3 of 3 ends

identified in the Final EIR have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this Project.

No change in the project, change in the circumstances, nor new information are present which require a supplemental EIR or further environmental review.

Based on that assessment, the proposed project is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan, which applies to projects implementing specific plans. No further environmental review is required.

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
On August 17, 2022, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500-foot radius of the parcel boundary and posted at the City's designated community posting sites pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 17.74 of the Municipal Code. Notification of the public hearing was published in The Desert Sun on August 21, 2022. All written comments received prior to the publication date of this report are included as Attachment 6. Any information addressed to the City Council, but received after completion of this final report, will be distributed at the public hearing.

ATTACHMENT($):

1. Aerial Photo

2. Public Hearing Notice

3. Draft Notice of Exemption

4. Planning Commission Staff Report dated July 14, 2022 (Without Attachments)

5. Draft Planning Commission Meeting Minutes from July 14, 2022

6. Written Comments Received

7. Tentative Tract Map No. 38291

8. Preliminary Grading Exhibit

9. Street Name Exhibit

10. Buildout Status Exhibits

11. Conceptual Landscape Booklet
AGENDA ITEM#

Section 31 Phases 1B & 1C Tentative Tract Map No. 38291 (“Project”) Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0002
Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM22-0001

ATTACHMENT 1
10-4
Planning Division
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
[email protected]
(760) 328-2266

P U B L I C H E A R I N G N O T I C E

CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING
Thursday, September 1, 2022 – 1:00 p.m.

Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0002
Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM22-0001 (TTM No. 38291) (“Project”)

Applicant: MSA Consulting, Inc. on behalf of EC Rancho Mirage Holdings LP

Request: Consideration to subdivide 70.44 acres within the Section 31 Specific Plan, into 187 single- family residential lots, 4 remainder lots , as well as lots for open space, recreation, private streets, and a CVWD well site.

Location: Southwest corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive APNs: 685-220-016, 685-220-017, 685-220-018, & 685-220-019

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Public Hearing will be held before the City of Rancho Mirage CITY COUNCIL RE: consideration of the above referenced application pursuant to Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Title 17. This Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan). The Section 31 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2018081074) was certified in December 2019.

The Public Hearing will be held on Thursday, September 1, 2022, at 1:00 p.m., in the Council Chamber, 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California, at which time and place pertinent testimony will be heard. The file, including all environmental information, is available for public inspection at City Hall, Monday through Friday, between 8 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.

For information on how to participate in the City Council meeting remotely, please contact the City Clerk at (760) 324-4511 Ext. 488, or via email to [email protected], no later than 10:00 a.m. on the day of the meeting. Written testimony may be submitted to the City Clerk via email to [email protected], or mailed to City of Rancho Mirage, ATTN: City Clerk, 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270. Written testimony must be received no later than 10 :00 a.m. on the day of the meeting to be considered by the City Council.

GOVERNMENT CODE § 65009 NOTICE: If you challenge this proposed activity in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the Public Hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council sufficiently prior to the Public Hearing to enable its consideration by them.

ATTACHMENT 2
10-5

Vicinity Map – Not to Scale

10-6

Development Services Department
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage CA 92270
Phone 760/328-2266 Fax 760/324-9851

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION

To: Office of Planning and Research Chief Deputy County Clerk P.O. Box 3044 3470 12th Street
Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 Riverside, CA 92501

Project Title/Case Nos. Section 31 Phases 1B & 1C - Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0002 & Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM22-0001 (Tentative Tract Map No. 38291)

Project Location:

Southwest corner of Monterey
Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive
in the City of Rancho Mirage

APNs: 685-220-016, 685-220-
017, 685-220-018, & 685-220-
019
Applicant/Representative:

MSA Consulting, Inc. obo EC Rancho
Mirage Holdings Limited Partnership
Attn: Paul DePalatis
34200 Bob Hope Drive
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Project Description:

Subdivision of 70.44 acres within the
Section 31 Specific Plan into 187
single-family residential lots, 4
remainder lots, as well as lots for open
space, recreation, private streets, and a
CVWD well site.

Name of Public Agency Approving Project: Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project:

City of Rancho Mirage Joy Tsai
Associate Planner

Exempt Status: (check one)
Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268); Declared Emergency [Sec. 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)] Emergency Project [Sec. 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)(c)]; Statutory Exemption; Code No Categorical Exemption. State type and Section number:

Other. State type and Section number: CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 - Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan

Reasons why project is exempt: This Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 for projects pursuant to a specific plan . On December 5, 2019, the Section 31 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified (State Clearinghouse Number 2018081074). The proposed project is consistent with the adopted Section 31 Specific Plan and no potential new impacts related to the proposed project has been identified tha t would necessitate further environmental review beyond the impacts and issued disclosed and evaluated under the certified EIR.

Lead Agency Contact Person: Joy Tsai, Associate Planner Telephone No. (760) 328-2266

Date: September 1, 2022
Joy Tsai, Associate Planner

Signed by Lead Agency Date Received for filing at OPR:

ATTACHMENT 3
10-7

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #

STAFF REPORT

TO: Planning Commission DATE: July 14, 2022

FROM: Joy Tsai, Associate Planner

SUBJECT: Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0002 & Tentative Tract Map Case No.

TTM22-0001 (TTM38291) – Section 31 Phases 1B & 1C

SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION

That the Planning Commission recommend to the City Council:

1. The filing of a Notice of Exemption based on Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22- 0002 and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guide lines Section 15182 for Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan; and,

2. Approval of Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM 22-0001 (TTM38291), subject to the Conditions of Approval and based on the content and Findings in the staff report.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Aerial Photo

2. Public Hearing Notice

3. Draft Notice of Exemption

4. Tentative Tract Map No. 38291

5. Street Name Exhibit

6. Buildout Status Exhibits

7. Preliminary Grading Exhibit

8. Conceptual Landscape Booklet

FACTS

1. Applicant: MSA Consulting, Inc. on behalf of EC Rancho Mirage Holdings Limited Partnership

2. Purpose of Request: Subdivision of 70.44 acres within the Section 31 Specific Plan into 187 single-family residential lots,
4 remainder lots, as well as lots for open space,
recreation, private streets, and a CVWD well site.

3. Location: Southwest corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive; APNs: 685-220-016, 685-220-017, 685-
220-018, & 685-220-019

4. Parcel Size: 70.44 acres

5. Existing Streets: Gerald Ford Drive (N), Monterey Avenue (E), Frank Sinatra Drive (S), and Bob Hope Drive (W)

6. Existing Land Use: Vacant land
ATTACHMENT 4
10-8
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 2 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #

7. Existing General Plan/Zoning: Mixed U se (M -U); Section 31 Specific Plan , Planning Areas 1 & Town Center

8. Proposed Land Use: Residential with open space , recreation, private streets, and a CVWD well site

9. Surrounding Land Use: N: Planned residential development (Versailles) E: Vacant; Resort and country club ( Marriott's
Shadow Ridge Golf Club in the City of Palm Desert)
S: Vacant land
W: Vacant land

10. Surrounding General Plan/Zoning: N: Low Density Residential (R-L-3) E: Mixed Use (M -U); Section 31 Specific Plan
Planning Areas 1, 3, & Town Center ; City of Palm
Desert
S: Mixed Use (M -U); Section 31 Specific Plan
Planning Areas 1, 3, & Town Center
W: Mixed Use (M -U); Section 31 Specific Plan
Planning Area 1

11. Environmental Information: This Project is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section
15182. On December 5, 2019, the Section 31
Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
was certified (SCH# 2018081074). The proposed
project is consistent with the adopted Specific Plan
and no potential new impacts ha ve been identified
that would require further environmental review.

12. Application Deemed Complete June 21, 2022

SUMMARY
The applicant, Paul Depalatis of MSA Consulting, Inc., and owner, EC Rancho Mirage Holdings Limited Partnership, are requesting approval for the subdivision of four (4) parcels totaling 70.44 acres within the Section 31 Specific Plan located at the southwest corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive (“Project”). The entitlement package includes the following applications:

Environmental Assessment (EA) and Tentative Tract Map (TTM) to subdivide the subject property into 187 single-family residential lots, 4 remainder lots, as well as lots for open space and recreational amenities, private streets, and a Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) well site. Access to the future residential lots is proposed by extending the private street system approved in Phase 1A (Tract Map No. 37856) and in conformance with the Section 31 Specific Plan. The CVWD well site maintains access from Gerald Ford Drive.

BACKGROUND
Section 31 consists of roughly one square mile of undeveloped land located centrally in the heart of the Coachella Valley. In 1977, the site was sold by the Annenberg Estate to investors which fractured sole ownership of the property into a 60/40 split. In 1993, Th e Eagle Specific Plan (“The Eagle”) was adopted for the project site. The Eagle proposed a golf course community of approximately 650 acres, which included associated residential, recreational, and commercial 10-9
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 3 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
uses within the project area. Due to financing challenges and bankruptcy of one of the property’s former owners, Section 31 never developed, and The Eagle Specific Plan was never implemented and eventually superseded as part of the 2005 General Plan Update.

In 2017, the current owner , EC Rancho Mira ge Holdings Limited Partnershi p, entered into a contract to purchase Section 31 and began negotiations with the Annenberg Foundation Trust to amend the Covenant Agreement originally executed in 1977. The Covenant Agreement was amended in December of 2017 and was recorded on the property as the First Amended and Restated Covenant Agreement (DOC #2018-0115512). In early 2018, the purchase of Section 31 was completed, and shortly thereafter, in May of 2018, an application for the Section 31 Specific Plan was submitted.

The Section 31 Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”) was adopted by ordinance by the City Council on December 5, 2019, with the second reading of the ordinance occurring on December 19, 2019.

The Specific Plan allows the development of a mixed -use community including the following:
resort hotels, a mixed-use town center, residential neighborhoods, a private street system, and recreational open space amenities.

The Specific Plan would enable the development of up to 175,000 square feet of combined office, restaurant, and neighborhood commercial uses, a combined total of 1,932 residential units and hotel -branded residential units, and up to 400 hotel keys. The Specific Plan established four planning areas and three categories of land uses, including the Lagoon (LAG), Mixed-Use Core (M -U CORE), and Residential (RES). The Planning Areas would include a Town Center, along with three separate residential areas . The master plan is des igned for sequential construction in multiple phases, corresponding to the infrastructure and product designs for individual Planning Areas and land use types.

On November 4, 2021, the City Council approved the Final Map for Tract Map No. 37856, known as Phase 1A, for the subdivision of 201.89 gross acres into 329 residential lots and associated infrastructure located at the southeast corner of Bob Hope Drive and Gerald Ford Drive. The tract map for Phase 1 A was subsequently recorded with Riverside County on December 15, 2021. The Public Works Department has various permits issued for rough grading plans and street improvements. No entitlement applications for vertical construction have been submitted as of the date of this report.

On February 7, 2022, a Minor Modification Application (Case No. MOD22-0009) was submitted to refine t he conceptual land use and circulation plans in the Mixed Use Core/ Town Center Planning Area to replace one hotel (“Hotel 1” in the Specific Plan Conceptual Land Use Exhibit) from the Town Center Planning Area with a mix of residential lot types, such as Residential Conventional and Residential Cluster lot types. The Specific Plan allows administrative review of minor modifications, such as changes to the d istribution, configuration, and location of residential units within or between Planning Areas, so long as the modifications are consistent with the purpose and intent of the Specific Plan [Section 31 Specific Plan Section 5.12.4 Amendment]. The Minor Modification Application was approved as the proposed modifications will not exceed the maximum number of 1,932 dwelling units permitted by the Specific Plan and evaluated by the Specific Plan EIR. The general density structure will not be intensified as Residential Cluster/Residential Conventional Uses propose density ranges of 9 to 30 dwelling 10-10
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 4 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
units per acre and 4 to 7 dwelling units per acre, respectively. In comparison, the Specific Plan density range for the Mixed Use Core/Town Center is 20 to 60 dwelling units per acre.

Site and Surrounding General Plan, Zoning and Land Uses Section 31 is bordered by Gerald Ford Drive to the north, Frank Sinatra Drive to the south, Bob Hope Drive to the west, and Monterey Avenue to the east . The Project Site is in the northeast quadrant of Section 31 and consists of partially stabilized sand hummocks and rolling hills that rise between one to four feet above their base. Much of the Project Site contains the non-native and invasive Sahara mustard species.

The following table describes the surrounding land uses located adjacent to the subject property:

General Plan Specific Plan Land Use
Project
Site Mixed Use (M-U) Section 31 Specific Plan -
Planning Areas 1 & Town Center Vacant
North Low Density
Residential (R-L-3) N/A Single-family residential
(Versailles)
East Mixed Use (M-U);
City of Palm Desert
Section 31 Specific Plan - Planning
Areas 1, 3, & Town Center; City of
Palm Desert
Vacant; Resort and country
club (Marriott’s Shadow
Ridge Golf Club)
South Mixed Use (M-U) Section 31 Specific Plan - Planning Areas 1, 3, & Town Center Vacant
West Mixed Use (M-U) Section 31 Specific Plan - Planning Area 1 Vacant

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project will subdivide four lots totaling 70.44 gross acres into 187 single-family detached residential lots, 4 remainder lots for future Residential or Town Center uses , as well as lots for open space, recreation, private streets, and a CVWD well site. No new vertical development is being proposed in conjunction with the proposed subdivision.

The acreages corresponding to the proposed uses are provided in the table below:

Proposed Use Units Proposed Area
Single-family detached lots
(Lots 1 through 187)
81 Residential Conventional
106 Residential Cluster

31.25 AC
Future Residential or Town Center (Lots 188
through 191)
- 12.38 AC
Private streets - 10.23 AC
Open space (Lots “A” through “V”) - 10.15 AC
Recreation (Lot “W”) - 5.68 AC
CVWD well site (Lot “X”) - 0.75 AC
Total Gross Acres 70.44 AC

Residential lot sizes range from 4,500 square feet to 13,699 square feet, with minimum dimensions of 50 feet in width and 90 feet in depth.

10-11
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 5 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #

ANALYSIS
Review Authority (Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Section 16.12.065) A tentative map is a map approving the division of land for the purpose of sale, lease, or financing, and is governed by the Subdivision Map Act. A tentative map prescribes how the land is to be subdivided. The City’s Subdivision Ordinance (Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Title 16 Subdivisions) establishes the minimum standards for the design of the lots, and the public improvements which serve them.

Once a tentative map is approved, the refined final map is approved by the City Council if deemed by the City Engineer to be in substantial conformance with the tentative map. The final map is then recorded with the Riverside County Recorder’s Office, after which the newly-created parcels may be individually sold and developed pursuant to the underlying General Plan and zoning regulations.

Tentative Tract Map No. 38291
The proposed subdivision complies with the Section 31 Specific Plan pertaining to lot size and dimensions. The following table represents the proposed residential lot mix for the Tentative Tract Map and the minimum lot dimensions required by the Specific Plan. Residential lot sizes range from 4,500 square feet to 13,699 square feet, with minimum dimensions of 50 feet in width and 90 feet in depth.

Specific Plan
Lot Type
Specific
Plan
Minimum
Dimensions
Lot #
Proposed
Minimum
Dimensions
Lot
Count
Residential
Lot Mix %
Meets
Requirements
Conventional
Lot (8,000
SFD)
70 ft. x 110 ft.
8,000 sq. ft.
26-30, 39, 41 &
43 70 ft. x 130 ft.
9,100 sq. ft. 8 4% Yes
Conventional
Lot (5,500
SFD)
50 ft. x 110 ft.
5,500 sq. ft.
1-18, 23-25, 31-
35, 38, 44 & 47
60 ft. x 120 ft.
7,200 sq. ft. 29 16% Yes
Conventional
Lot (5,500
SFD)
50 ft. x 110 ft.
5,500 sq. ft.
19-22, 36, 37, 40,
42, 45, 46, 48, 49,
50-58, 68-78 &
87-98
50 ft. x 110 ft.
5,500 sq. ft. 44 24% Yes
Cluster - Small
Lot Detached
(3,000 SFD)
40 ft. x 76 ft.
3,000 sq. ft.
59-67, 79-86 &
99-187
50 ft. x 90 ft.
4,500 sq. ft. 106 56% Yes
Residential Lots Subtotal 187 100%
Residential or
Town Center -
TBD
TBD 188 - 191 N/A 4 N/A
N/A -
Remainder
Lots
Total Proposed Lots 191

As part of the subdivision review, staff sent notices to the Public Works Department, Riverside County Fire Marshal’s Office, and all public utility companies and service agencies regarding the proposed subdivision on January 26, 2022. All agencies are expected to provide service to the 10-12
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 6 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
proposed parcels, including providers of gas, electrical, water, sewer, and cable telecommunication services.

As set forth in the above analysis, the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the Section 31 Specific Plan and all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.

Access and Circulation
The Project Site is located at the southwest corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive.

The proposed subdivision is an extension of Phase 1 A (Tract Map No. 37856), which can be accessed at future signalized entrances along Bob Hope Drive and Gerald Ford Drive. Access to the future residential lots is proposed by extending the private street system approved in Phase 1A. The CVWD well site maintains separate access from Gerald Ford Drive. In addition, an emergency vehicle access easement located approximately 731 feet south of the Gerald Ford Drive and Monterey Avenue intersection is dedicated on the Master Tract Map (Tract Map No. 37563) to p rovide a third point of access and will remain in place until the Town Center is developed.

The Specific Plan takes a multi -modal approach to circulation system planning. Vehicle and pedestrian circulation patterns were reviewed for conformity with the Specific Plan and City’s development standards.

Grading & Drainage
The Project Site topography is generally flat but slopes gently from an elevation of 318.6 feet at the northeast corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive to a lower elevation of 296.5 feet at the southwest corner of the Project Site. The pad elevations for the proposed lots along Gerald Ford Drive range from 314.0 feet on the western end to 319.1 feet on the eastern end.

In comparison, the highest points of Gerald Ford Drive range from 310.6 feet to 318.0 feet, west to east. The pad elevations for the lots in the Versailles development to the north are set approximately 3 to 4.27 feet above Gerald Ford Drive, whereas the lots for the proposed tentative map along Gerald Ford Drive are proposed to be set 1 to 3 feet above Gerald Ford Drive.

The Specific Plan incorporates a grading approach tailored to the existing topography to maximize views and with consideration of neighboring developments. The grading of the project is required to be designed so that all storm water to the level of a 100-year frequency storm shall be retained on site. In general terms, the individual lots will drain to the private streets, which will then convey water to a series of retention basins located throughout the site. There are several retention basins that have been proposed throughout Section 31 that will be incorporated into the landscape plan and constructed and sized to retain the worse-case flood volume from a 100-year storm event. As conditioned, t he applicant is responsible for submitting the final hydrology report to the Engineering Division for review and approval.

Entries, Landscaping, and Walls
The landscaping theme for Section 31 is influenced by the climate of the Coachella Valley and puts emphasis on native, native adaptive, drought tolerant, and low water -use plantings. Lots “A” through “V” will be reserved for open space areas such as landscaped parkways, streetscapes, and private neighborhood parks.

10-13
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 7 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
The overall perimeter landscaped parkway, with a width ranging between 30 to 250 feet, features a desert-appropriate landscape palette and a typical eight-foot wide concrete multi-use path in a natural light grey color with a light broom finish. The planting design is best described as a contemporary geometric aesthetic and is reminiscent of parkways outside of Sunnylands. The planting design along the perimeter of the project was developed with a specific audience in mind, an audience of travelers. Most onlookers will be viewing the perimeter landscaping from inside vehicles, with a primary viewing speed of 45 miles per hour. The sca le, distancing and layout of the landscap ed parkway was designed for consistency with the Section 31 Specific Plan and compatibility with surrounding land uses.

The perimeter wall along Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive will continue the usage of warm muted olive-green and beige colors in a plaster finish that were approved in Phase 1A and pursuant to the direction given by the Architectural Review Board at th e February 10, 2020 meeting. To enhance the perception of visual depth in certain areas along the perimeter wall, the perimeter wall design will utilize offset wall sections that are setback from the primary wall face. B erms and undulations will be incor porated in feature landscape areas adjacent to the street corners, retention basins, and entrances, and will be incorporated into the final landscape plans for the perimeter parkways. The final entry designs are contingent upon future development, though the applicant has proposed dark grey metal gates and perforated decorative walls similar to Sunnylands’ aesthetics. As conditioned, a Final Development Plan (FDP) for the perimeter wall and landscaping is required to be submitted for review prior to a prior to issuance of any building permits.

The extensive landscape palette draws from the desert native context of the Coachella Valley and consists of low to moderate water usage species; the complete list can be found in the conceptual landscape exhibit booklet (Attachment No. 8). As proposed, all canopy trees will be at least 24 -inch box selections and multi -trunk; shrubs will vary from 1 to 5 -gallon selections.

Various shrubs and accent plants, such as golden barrel cactus and various types of yuccas, are provided as a backdrop, with a mix of dark brown and beige rock and decomposed granite to provide contrast. Tree selections within the parkway include blue Palo Verde, Palo Brea, Chilean Mesquite, and fruitless European olive trees. The retention basin will be screened and generally devoid of plantings, aside from a few trees, such as the Palo Brea and Desert Ironwood trees.

The conceptual landscape booklet also features streetscapes and private neighborhood parks, which will have a more in timate, residential scale. These designs are conceptual and will eventually be shaped and refined by the development of the community through a future Development Plan application.

FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN (FDP)
Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the applicant shall submit a Final Development Plan (FDP), which shall include detailed written responses to each of the project’s conditions of approval along with the final set of construction, grading, lighting, landscaping, and irrigation plans. Any revisions that are in substantial compliance with the original project, and do not trigger the need for additional environmental analysis, can likely be reviewed at the staff level through either the FDP process or Minor Modification process. If, however, there are wholesale 10-14
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 8 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
changes to the project during the FDP review, the applicant shall be required to submit additional applications to modify the entitlement as necessary.

ADDITIONAL CORRESPONDENCE
As part of the subdivision review, staff sent notices to the Public Works Department, Riverside County Fire Marshal’s Office, and all public utility companies and service agencies regarding the proposed subdivision on January 26, 2022. All agencies are expected to provide service to the proposed parc els, including providers of gas, electrical, water, sewer, and cable telecommunication services. Any received comments have been incorporated into this report and the Conditions of Approval. Any correspondence received after the distribution of this report will be presented to the Planning Commissioners during the public hearing.

NOTICING REQUIREMENT
Rancho Mirage Municipal Code Section 17.74.020, Hearing and notice, requires that all property owners, as shown on the county’s latest equalized assessment roll, within a 500-foot radius of the boundaries of the subject parcel (s) be notified of matters requiring a public hearing. If the number of property owners to who m the notice would be mailed to is less than 25, then the mailing radius is required to be increased to 1,000 feet as measured from the exterior boundaries of the subject parcel.

On June 29, 2022, public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within a 500-foot radius of the parcel boundary and posted at the City’s designated community posting sites pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 17.74 of the Municipal Code. Notification of the public hearing was published in The Desert Sun on July 3, 2022. Any information addressed to the Planning Commission, but received after completion of this final report, will be distributed at the public hearing. No comments have been received as of the publication date of this report.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This Project has been reviewed for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). N o potential new impacts related to the proposed project ha ve been identified that would necessitate further environmental review beyond the impacts and issue s disclosed and evaluated under the certified Section 31 Specific Plan EIR, State Clearinghouse Number (SCH No.) 2018081074. The City Council passed Resolution No. 2019-65 to adopt Findings of Fact, approve the Statement of Overriding Considerations, and certify the Section 31 Final EIR on December 5, 20 19. Based on that assessment, t he proposed project is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan, which applies to projects implementing specific plans.

According to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, where a public agency has prepared an EIR on a specific plan after January 1, 1980, certain residential, commercial, and mixed-use projects undertaken pursuant to and in conformity to that specific plan are exempt from CEQA if the project meets the requirements of State CEQA Guidelines Section 15182(c). Residential projects covered by this section include but are not limited to land subdivisions, zoning changes, and residential planned unit developments. The Tentative Tract Map proposes the subdivision of 70.44 gross acres into 187 single -family residential lots, 4 remainder lots, as wel l as 10-15
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 9 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
associated landscaping and on -site improvements. The effects of the implementation of the Section 31 Specific Plan were examined in the EIR and all feasible mitigation measures and alternatives developed and identified in the Final EIR have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this Project.

SUMMARY
Through the implementation of the Section 31 Specific Plan, the master planned community will be designed to accommodate a blend of land uses through complementary Planning Areas and Land Use Categories and provides for a mixture of housing products and densities with intensity and density increasing towards the center of Section 31. All agencies will provide service to the proposed parcels, including providers of gas, electrical, water, s ewer, and cable telecommunication services. As set forth in the above analysis, the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the City’s General Plan and zoning, Section 31 Specific Plan, and all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act.
10-16
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 10 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM22-0001 (Tentative Tract Map No. 38291)

I. GENERAL

1. APPROVAL
In accordance with Government Code Section 66452.6(a)(1), the Tentative Tract Map shall be effective for the term of Development Agreement Case No. DA190003 (Document No. 2020-0055580), which shall expire on January 18, 2045, subject to any extension and early termination provisions described in the Development Agreement.

2. CONFORMANCE
The development of the subject property shall conform substantially with the approved exhibits contained in Case No. EA22-0002 and TTM22-0001 and all associated cases on file in the Planning Division . This includes all dimensional and size specifications, landscaping, hardscape, design treatments (including color and materials), and the locations of perimeter walls and plant materials as shown in the conceptual landscape exhibit booklet dated May 27, 2022.

3. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The applicant shall execute a written acknowledgment to the Planning Division stating acceptance of and compliance with all of the Conditions of Approval for this Tentative Tract Map and all associated cases, and that the plans submitted are in compliance with the Conditions of Approval. No modifications shall be made to said plans without written approval from the appropriate decision -making body. All a pplicable Conditions of Approval for the Master Tract Map ( Tract No. 37563) are hereby incorporated by reference.

4. PROTEST PERIOD
The Conditions of Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90 -day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun.

5. MITIGATION MEASURES INCORPORATED HEREIN
The property owner shall be responsible for implementing the Mitigation Monitoring Program contained within the certified Section 31 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report, as necessary.

6. GREEN WASTE & RECYCLING
All green waste shall be disposed of at a permitted composting facility. The applicant shall undertake or cause to be undertaken such action or actions as are necessary to permit and/or otherwise accommodate the implementation of recycling services. Such action or actions may include, but are not limited to: designating and providing adequate 10-17
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 11 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
area at convenient locations with appropriate access for the placement of dumpsters and/or bin sets; constructing permanent enclosures that meet all requirements of the Code of the City of Rancho Mirage for each dumpster and/or bin set; providing for the security of each dumpster to discourage scavenging, and; providing adequate indoor area at convenient locations for the collection and short -term storage of recyclables. The applicant shall submit a “Recycling Program” that has been rev iewed by an agent of the City, which, at a minimum, explains, states or otherwise defines: (1) recyclables generated by type; (2) estimate by pounds for each recyclable generated; (3) number of dumpsters and/or plastic bin sets (one set equals three “baske ts”) needed to accommodate estimated recyclables; (4) location of each dumpster (may be identified on a map attached as an exhibit); (5) method of collection such as curbside at each residential unit or at rear of property by dumpster, etc.; and (6) pick -up schedule for recyclables. The applicant shall provide other such information as may be necessitated by the development proposal.

7. WATER
All water features shall be maintained in compliance with Ordinance No. 844. Water efficient landscaping shall be maintained in compliance with Chapter 17.24 (Landscaping Standards) of the RMMC.

8. GATED RESIDENTIAL EMERGENCY ACCESS
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 1170, all gated communities of two or more residential units shall install a Knox entry system, consistent with any emergency access policy, for use by the Sheriff’s Department. The City Manager or their designee shall implement t he requirement and enforcement of this Condition of Approval.

9. SIGNAGE
Future neighborhood signage shall be subject to approval and issuance of a separate sign permit or sign program.

II. PLANNING
Prior to City Council approval of the Final Map, the following Conditions shall be satisfied:

10. STREET NAMES AND ADDRESSES
Street names and addresses for the subdivision shall be submitted to the Development Services Director or their designee and shall be subject to the approval of the City of Rancho Mirage pursuant to Chapters 12.06 and 17.58 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code. The approved street name(s) shall be shown on the Final Map.

11. FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIRED
A Final Development Plan application (FDP) shall be required prior to issuance of any permits. The Final Development Plan (FDP) shall include a complete set of Construction Plans, Final Lighting Plans (including cut-sheets with Photometric Plan), Precise Grading Plan, Wall Plans, Final Landscaping and Irrigation Plans, and any other requirements as listed in the Final Development Plan application and as required by staff.

10-18
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 12 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
A. The Development Services Director shall consider the Final Development Plan Permit application. He or she may approve a Final Development Plan permit if it substantially conforms to the Tentative Tract Map , landscape plans , and associated Conditions of Approval and Development Agreement.

B. The approved landscape plan may be modified only with City approval in a manner pursuant to Section 17.42.120 (Modification of a Development Plan Permit). Minor modifications to an approved plan may be considered by the Development Services Director.

C. The project shall be completed in accordance with the Ordinances, requirements, guidelines, and other criteria in effect at the time of construction, and/or in accordance with the provisions in the Section 31 Specific Plan and Development Agreement.

D. Landscaping, Wall, and Grading Plans shall demonstrate that all electrical transformers, utility pads, cable TV and phone boxes, and similar utility fixtures will be screened, pursuant to RMMC Chapter 17.20 and/or installed underground if required.

E. Landscaping. The plans shall be submitted as a Landscape Documentation Package in accordance with Ordinance No. 990, and as amended by Ordinance 1101. Such Plan(s) shall be consistent with the Preliminary Landscape Plan, and the applicant shall provide evidence that the landsca pe plan has been reviewed and approved by the Riverside County Office of the Agricultural Commissioner and the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) prior to requesting a final inspection.

The final landscaping and irrigation plans shall incorporate the use of Evapotranspiration (ET) irrigation “smart” controllers which shall include automatic water scheduling, rain, and temperature sensors. Prior to a final inspection, the landscape contractor shall verify in writing with Planning staff that controllers have been installed, are correctly programmed, and operate with these features. More information on smart controllers can be found at www.irrigation.com. The project landscape architect shall submit written verification that the landscaping and irrigation has been installed per the approved plans.

i. Vegetation with spikes that may be harmful to pedestrians shall be a minimum of three (3) feet away from walkways.

F. Walls. Where perimeter walls are shown on the development plan they shall be designed with aesthetic relief and be of high -quality architectural design to compliment adjacent developments. In accordance with the Community Design Elements, the landscaped parkway and perimeter wall along all property lines shall be aesthetically enriched and subject to approval of Planning staff, with Architectural Review Board review as deemed necessary. All top of wall elevations and adjacent finish grade elevations for the project perimeter and entry walls shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division and City Engineer.

10-19
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 13 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
G. Lighting. All exterior lighting shall be shown on the Final Development Plan and shall be low-level directed lighting, energy -efficient and shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflections are confined within the boundaries of the subject site. All pole or building mounted lighting shall be directed downward and away from adjoining properties and public right of way. Lighting shall not blink, flash, or be of unusually high intensity or brightness. All lighting fixtures shall be appropriate in scale, intensity, and height to the building and shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division. A photometric plan shall be required as a part of the Final Development Plan application and shall show a zero -foot-candle light reading at all property lines.

III. PUBLIC WORKS
Prior to City Council Approval of the Final Map, the following Conditions shall be satisfied:

12. FORMATION AND/OR ANNEXATION TO CFD
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 485 the applicant shall provide evidence that formation of, or annexation to a Communities Facilities District (CFD) No. 1 – Police and Fire services – to pay the City annually for public service costs associated with this project has been initiated. This requires the submittal of an application fee, the preparation of a boundary map, and 6-8 weeks processing time. The applicant is advised to begin t he application process as soon as possible, because the CFD annexation must occur prior to issuance of Building Permits.

13. STUDIES AND CALCULATIONS REQUIRED
The applicant shall submit a soils report, geological and hydrology studies, and hydraulic calculations, as required by the City Engineer, prior to approval of the Final Map or Grading Plan, whichever occurs first.

14. GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN
The applicant shall be required to submit a grading and drainage plan prepared by a licensed civil engineer to the City Engineer for plan check and approval. The grading and drainage plan shall be consistent with any and all conditions of approval associa ted with any applicable subdivision map and any Development Permit entitlements issued for the subject project by the City or any other responsible public agency. The grading and drainage plan shall conform to all city policies, standards, and regulations applicable to the project. In addition, if the project involves grading and drainage issues related to Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) facilities, written evidence of the District’s approval shall be included with the submittal required by the City of Rancho Mirage.

15. STORMWATER RETENTION
The grading of the project shall be designed such that all storm water to the level of a 100-year frequency storm; worst case of the 1, 3, 6, or 24-hour duration, shall be retained on site. Per Municipal Code Section 15.64.140.B, if the project is less than 1 acre or if it is south of the Whitewater Flood Channel, the grading of the project may be designed for the drainage to be conveyed to an “acceptable disposal site as determined by the City Engineer”. Surface streets are not considered “an acceptable disposal site” for common 10-20
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 14 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
“nuisance water” from sprinklers and cleaning. Therefore, at a minimum, all projects shall make provisions to absorb such “nuisance water” to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

A Hyd rology/Hydraulic Report, in accordance with the Riverside County Hydrology Manual, shall be submitted from a Registered Civil Engineer, showing how this stormwater is handled.

16. STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS The applicant shall execute and submit the City of Rancho Mirage’s Standard Agreement for Construction of Public Improvements for review and approval by the City Engineer and City Attorney.

17. STREET IMPROVEMENTS
Street improvements shall be required as specifie d below. Plans for the construction of the required street improvements shall be designed by a California Registered Engineer and approved by the City Engineer prior to recordation of a Final Map or prior to issuance of Grading Permits if not associated wi th a Final Map. All street construction shall be in conformance with these plans and the City’s adopted Road Improvement Standards.

Plans shall be approved prior to or concurrent with Final Development Plan approval and construction shall occur prior to occupancy. The developer shall furnish proof that any Sewer and Water Improvement Plans have been reviewed and approved by CVWD. The developer shall furnish proof that the Fire Marshal has approved the Water Plans and Street layout for the project.

A. Public Streets – Gerald Ford Drive and Monterey Avenue i. The right-of-way along Gerald Ford Drive at a width of 55 feet from centerline shall be dedicated to the City of Rancho Mirage if not already done. An easement for the meandering bike path shall also be dedicated along the Tract frontage.
ii. The right-of-way along Monterey Avenue at a width of 60 feet from centerline shall be dedicated to the City of Rancho Mirage if not already done. An easement for the meandering bike path shall also be dedicated along the Tract frontage.
iii. Plans for the required 8’ wide Class I meandering bike path per Standard 500, shall be submitted to the City Engineer, and shall be shown on the landscape and plans and shall be constructed along the frontage. A sidewalk or alternative handicap accessible route shall be constructed from the bike path to the project.

Where the bikeway is located on private property, a public access easement shall be provided and recorded subject to approval of the City Engineer. iv. The design of the entry way shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Right turn lanes shall be provided at the entries and traffic signals per the Section 31 Specific Plan.
v. Construction of a sixteen (16) foot wide median island along the project arterial street frontage shall be required if not already done. The full width of the median island shall be improved with landscaping and irrigation in accordance with the adopted City of Rancho Mirage Median Landscaping Standards if not already done.
10-21
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 15 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
vi. Until such time as an alternative public storm drain system or street surface drainage system can be completed, this project must accept the responsibility for absorbing the water from the 100 -year storm street drainage along the project frontage and the tributary area upstream.
vii. Landscape and irrigation plans for all public street parkways and median islands shall conform to City standards and be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and Planning Division. Boulders shall not exceed 15 inches in height within 3 feet of a public street curb. Canopy trees shall be placed a minimum of 10 feet from public street curb and a minimum of 3 from sidewalks. Palm trees shall be placed a minimum of 3 feet from public street curb with a minimum trunk height of 10 feet. Right of way lines shall be shown on the final landscape plan.

B. Private Streets/Parking Lots
i. Private street and/or parking lot paving shall consist of a minimum of 3” A.C. paving over 4” of compacted Class II aggregate base material. On private streets and parking lots, and as may be required by a condition of approval, decorative concrete or other surfacing materials shall be reviewed by Public Works for conformance to Public Works standards.
ii. On private streets and parking lots, non -standard curb and gutter may be acceptable if the City’s standard drainage criteria is satisfied, and the specific non-standard curb and gutter is approved by the Department of Public Works. iii. The parking lot design and construction shall be completed in accordance with the City of Rancho Mirage standards and codes unless superseded by more stringent requirements from the State or Federal ADA guidelines. Such design shall include demonstration of adequate fire and delivery truck turning movements.
iv. In accordance with Municipal Code 17.26.070(d), all required off-street parking areas shall be designed so that surface water shall not drain over any sidewalks or adjoining parcels.
v. Private streets within the project shall be constructed in accordance with the Section 31 Specific Plan. Private street paving shall consist of a minimum of 3” A.C. paving over 4” of compacted Class II aggregate base material.

18. DEDICATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS
A five-foot public utility easement adjacent to the curb and gutter and ed ge of pavement shall be provided by the property owner or subdivider for all private streets, and up to ten feet of supplemental easement for public streets where the public right -of-way provides less than ten feet for utilities behind curb.

19. DEDICATION OF DRAINAGE EASEMENTS
All easements for drainage facilities necessary to accommodate the final approved Grading and Drainage Plan shall be offered for dedication to the appropriate serving agency. Such offer shall be incorporated on the Final M ap or as required by the City Engineer.

10-22
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 16 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #

20. SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM
A sanitary sewer system shall be required and shall be installed in accordance with the provisions established and set forth by the regulations of the Coachella Valley Water District, the Rive rside County Department of Public Health, and/or the regional Water Quality Control Board. All necessary sewer easements shall be provided.

21. PARK FEES
Pursuant to Section 11 of the Development Agreement, the Developer shall be entitled to a 100% credit ag ainst the requirement of land dedication or payment of in lieu fees otherwise required under Section 16.18.060, “Parks and Recreation Facilities” provided that Developer acquires, designs, constructs, improves, provides and maintains at no cost to City or its taxpayers, private open space for park and recreational purposes within the Project Site, including but not limited to the multi -use Grand Oasis Crystal Lagoon®, an integrated system of pedestrian, bicycle, and golf cart trail linkages, neighborhood parks, water features, a Beach Club for residents, and complementary features, in substantial conformance with the “Conceptual Open Space Plan ” (Section 31 Specific Plan , Figure

2.5), with the perpetual cost of maintenance being the responsibility of Develop er and/or the Project’s property owners pursuant to a recorded agreement, covenant, condition, restriction or other similar instrument that runs with the land and legally binds all current and future property owners, and which cannot be defeated, cancelled or eliminated without the prior written consent of City or its successor.

Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits for any construction created pursuant to the approval of the Map, the following Conditions shall be satisfied:

22. LOCAL AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (LAQMP)
The applicant shall prepare a Local Air Quality Management Plan (LAQMP) pursuant to Ordinance No. 855, Municipal Code Chapter 7.01. Said LAQMP shall detail the project’s potential impacts upon the air quality of the area and any necessary mitigation measures and shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to the issuance of the Grading Permit. For ease of preparing a LAQMP, the applicant may contact the Public Works Department regarding use of th e LAQMP worksheet. Projects over 10 acres shall also submit the 8.5 ”x11” format Dust Control Plan Required by the South Coast Air Quality Management District for review by the City. At the time of payment of the permit fees the developer shall submit a “dust control deposit” of $2,000 per acre or alternative grading security as approved by the City Engineer.

23. WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (WQMP)
Per the criteria of the Whitewater River Region Storm Water Management Plan (SWMP), subdivisions of 10 or more lots shall submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for review prior to approval of the Final Development Permit and/or Final Subdivision Map. (See Appendix H of the SWMP for details.) A Final WQMP shall be required prior to permit issuance, with Recording of a Covenant, or other approved mechanism, establishing the WQMP as a Public Record that shall apply upon occupancy, and continuing forward, to all future operators/residents of the project. Any approved design modifications that take place during construction shall be documented and incorporated into the Recorded WQMP Covenant prior to occupancy.
10-23
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 17 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #

24. SWPPP/NOI
Prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits, the Property Owner shall submit the completed Notice of Intent (NOI) form and site plan with the appropriate fee, to the State Water Quality Control Board for the Ge neral Construction Activity Storm Water Permit.

Proof of submittal shall be given to the City Engineer. The SWPPP promised by the NOI is required to be kept on the project site and may be requested for viewing by the City or Water Quality Control Board personnel. The WDID number issued with the SWPPP shall be put on the Grading Plan.

25. MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN (MSHCP) FEE Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall pay to the City the required Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Fee.

Prior to City Council Approval of the Final Map, the following Condition shall be satisfied:

26. CONSTRUCTION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
The construction of all required public and private improvements, including but not limited to landscaping, sewer, water, curb and gutters, paving, drainage facilities, and other required improvements shall be completed prior to occupancy of any structure and/or the subdivider shall enter into an agreement, acceptable to the City, ensuring the construction of such improvements within eighteen (18) months of City Council approval of the Final Map.

Prior to final acceptance of improvements by City Council and the release of bonds, the following conditions shall be satisfied:

27. WRITTEN VERIFICATION
Prior to release of bonds or financial guarantees, the applicant or his successor shall provide written verification that the improvements have been installed in accordance with the approved plans.

28. AS-BUILT PLANS
A complete set of “As -Built” Grading, Sewer, W ater, Landscaping, Street, Storm Drain , and all other required improvement plans shall be submitted by the engineer of record for review and approval.

As an informational item, prior to issuance of Building Permits for any construction on the site, the following conditions shall be satisfied:

29. TUMF FEE
The applicant shall pay to the Building Division the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) in effect at the time the Building Permits are issued.

10-24
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 18 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #

30. LICENSE TAX FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION
Pursuant to Section 10 of the Development Agreement, the Developer shall pay 100% of this license tax, pursuant to Chapter 3.28, “License Tax on New Construction” of the Municipal Code, subject to a credit, as set forth in Exhibit B in the Section 31 Development Agreement, for any actual costs Developer incurred for acquiring, designing, constructing, improving, providing and maintaining utility undergrounding facilities and improvements (or related to the removal of overhead utility facilities and structure) fronting the perimeter of the Project Site and which are provided for in the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan, the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program or the Section 31 Specific Plan duly approved by the City, plus any of the existing transmission lines located within the Project Site on the north side of Frank Sinatra Drive, less any credits received by Developer with respect to Infrastructure Undergrounding Development Impact Fee. The tax amount, creditable improvements to be constructed by Developer, and an estimate of the projected credit amount are set forth in Exhibit B in the Section 31 Development Agreement.

31. DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES (DIF)
The Project shall be subject to the Development Impact Mitigation Fees in effect as of January 18, 2020, the effective date of the Development Agreement, and subject to any applicable credits set forth in Exhibit B, Impact Fees and Credits , in the Development Agreement.

A. Transportation Facilities Impact Fee. Prior to issuance of each building permit, Developer shall pay 100% of this impact fee pursuant to Chapter 3.29, subject to a credit, as set forth in Exhibit B in the Development Agreement , for any actual costs Developer incurred for acquiring, designing, constructing, improving, providing and maintaining any public “arterial” streets, interchanges or intersection improvements, traffic signals, sidewalks, bicycle and golf cart paths, landscape medians, entry monumentation, and related improvements provided for in the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan, the City ’s adopted Capital Improvement Program or the Section 31 Specific Plan duly approved by the City, along the perimeter of the Project Site, in the Town Center, and Vista Del Sol (if applicable), excluding local streets and collector streets. The specific fe e amount, creditable improvements to be constructed by Developer, and an estimate of the projected fee credit amount are set forth in Exhibit B in the Development Agreement.

B. General Government Facilities Development Impact Fee. Prior to issuance of each building permit, Developer shall pay 100% of this impact fee pursuant to Chapter 3.29 without any discounts, rebates, credits, or reductions, unless otherwise required under Chapter 3.29, in the amount set forth in Exhibit B in the Development Agreement.

C. Infrastructure Undergrounding Development Impact Fee. Prior to issuance of each building permit, Developer shall pay 100% of this impact fee pursuant to Chapter 3.29, subject to a credit, as set forth in Exhibit B in the Developm ent Agreement, for any actual costs Developer incurred for acquiring, designing, constructing, improving, providing and maintaining utility undergrounding facilities and improvements (or related to the removal of overhead utility facilities and structure) fronting the perimeter of the Project Site and which are provided for in the City of Rancho Mirage General 10-25
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 19 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
Plan, the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program or the Section 31 Specific Plan duly approved by the City, plus the existing transmission lines located on the Project Site on the north side of Frank Sinatra Drive, less any credits received by Developer against the License Tax on New Construction for the cost incurred for the same undergrounding activities. The specific fee amount, creditable impro vements to be constructed by Developer, and an estimate of the projected fee credit amount are set forth in Exhibit B in the Development Agreement.

D. Parks and Recreation Facilities and Improvements Development Impact Fees. Prior to issuance of each building permit, Developer shall pay 100% of this impact fee pursuant to Chapter 3.29, subject to a credit, as set forth in Exhibit B in the Development Agreement , for any actual costs Developer incurred for acquiring, designing, constructing, improving, providing and maintaining any public parks or recreation facilities or improvements provided for in the City of Rancho Mirage General Plan, the City’s adopted Capital Improvement Program or the Section 31 Specific Plan duly approv ed by the City or any privately owned parks or recreation facilities or improvements open to the public situated or located within the Project Site. The specific fee amount, creditable improvements to be constructed by Developer, and an estimate of the pro jected fee credit amount are set forth in Exhibit B in the Development Agreement.

E. Library Facilities Development Impact Fee. Prior to issuance of each building permit, Developer shall pay 100% of this impact fee pursuant to Chapter 3.29 without any discounts, rebates, credits , or reductions unless otherwise required under Chapter

3.29, in the amount set forth in Exhibit B in the Development Agreement.

32. PAD CERTIFICATION
Prior to release of building permits, a Pad Certification submitted from a Licensed Lan d Surveyor or Civil Engineer, attesting to the elevation matching the rough grade pad elevation shall be submitted to validate the rough grading completion.

33. COMPACTION REPORT
Prior to the release of building permits, the lot(s) for the building(s) shall h ave a compaction report submitted from a Geotechnical Engineer attesting to the buildable pad being compacted at least 90% of maximum relative density. If any over -excavation, or slopes steeper than 2:1, are needed for the building pad, a Geotechnical Eng ineer shall submit a document attesting to the acceptability of this non -standard earthwork in accordance with the recommendations of the preliminary soil report.

As an informational item and prior to occupancy of any unit in an approved Development Plan, the following Conditions shall be satisfied:

34. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES REQUIRED
All existing or proposed Southern California Edison, General Telephone, CATV, or other overhead service facilities, shall be installed underground in accordance with the provisions of Section 12.16 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code. The undergrounding installation of all existing or proposed overhead distribution and transmission utility lines 10-26
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 20 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
shall be completed and/or appropriate guarantee arrangements shall b e entered into for any structure constructed pursuant to this approval as required by the City Engineer. Such guarantee arrangement shall be approved by the City administrative staff and the City Attorney and shall include the posting of improvement securi ty adequate to secure the periphery of the subject property; and as identified above and as required in Section 12.16 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code.

35. IMPROVEMENTS COMPLETED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY
Prior to occupancy, the construction of all required public improvements, including but not limited to sewer, water, curb and gutters, paving to join, storm water drainage facilities, and other required utility improvements shall be completed. All conditions set for Tract 37563 shall be carried into Tracts 37856 and 38291 if not already completed.

36. CVWD LETTER
Prior to occupancy, if applicable, a letter from Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) shall be submitted stating that all the district fees have been paid and all requirements have been met for developmen t. Due to serious drought concerns, the City and CVWD reserve the right to apply water conservation requirements to the project at the time of Final Development Plan approval and prior to permit issuance. Any required changes shall be reviewed ministerial ly by City staff and by CVWD pursuant to their adopted protocol.

IV. CITY ATTORNEY
Prior to City Council approval of the Final Map, the following Conditions shall be satisfied:

37. INDEMNITY AGREEMENT
The permittee shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City or its agents, officers, or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul this permit approval. The City shall notify the permittee of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to notify the permittee of any claim, action or proceeding of which the City has written notice , the permittee shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City.

38. REIMBURSEMENTS
The permittee shall reimburse the City for any court and attorney’s fees which the City may be required to pay as a result of any claim or action brought against the City because of this grant. Although the permittee is the real party in interest in an action, the City may, at its sole discretion, participate in the defense of the action, but such participation shall not relieve the permittee of any obligation under this Condition.

39. IMPROVEMENT SURETY
Pursuant to Chapter 15.64.280 of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, all public improvements proposed with the Development Plan submittal, or required by the adopted approval Conditions, shall be guaranteed by cash bonds, letters of credit, or other legal instruments acceptable to the City Attorney and City Council. 10-27
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 21 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #

40. RELEASE OF PLANS
Written authorization must be obtained from any certified, licensed, or registered professional who signed the original building plans authorizing the plans to be made available by the City to all subsequent owners upon request (if on file with the City at the time of the request) for use by any subsequent owners solely fo r the construction, maintenance, operation, and use of the subject building(s) at the Project Site.

41. NOTICE TO CITY UPON DEFAULT, FORECLOSURE OR BANKRUPTCY In the event that the applicant receives a notice of default from any lender in connection with funds loaned to the applicant for the proposed development, or that any security instrument given by the applicant to any lender is foreclosed upon whether through a trustee’s sale or otherwise, or that the applicant files a petition for bankruptcy, the applicant shall immediately notify the City of such notice of default, foreclosure sale, and/or filing of the bankruptcy petition, as the case may be.

V. CONTRACT SPECIALIST
Prior to City Council Approval of the Final Map, the following condition shall be satisfied:

42. MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS
The current and future property owner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining in compliance with all City standards for the same, the on-site and off-site landscaping and integrated architectural features required by this entitlement; all perimeter landscaping shall be maintained in a first -class condition. Landscape maintenance shall consist of regular watering mowing, pruning, fertilizing, cleari ng of debris and weeds, and the removal and replacement of irrigation systems, in compliance with all relevant and applicable provisions of the Rancho Mirage Municipal Code. Integrated architectural features must be kept in a manner which maintains the desirability of the immediate area and neighboring areas and respects the harmonious relationship with existing and adjoining developments. Due regard for preservation of each feature and its intended irrigation with surrounding landscaping, buildings, stru ctures, screening, and signs is required. All features must be maintained in a manner commonly accepted by professionals who are experts in the care and preservation of each particular type of feature. A covenant to assure continued maintenance of on -site and off -site required landscaping and integrated architectural features by the current and future property owners or other liable entity, consistent with the terms and provisions of this condition of approval, shall be prepared in a format approved by the City Attorney and recorded in the Office of the Riverside County Recorder against all parcels created with this subdivision and any subsequent amendments thereto.

VI. FIRE MARSHAL
Prior to City Council Approval of the Final Map or approval of a Final Development Plan, whichever occurs first, the following Conditions shall be satisfied:

43. The proposed project may have a cumulative adverse impact of the Fire Department’s ability to provide an acceptable level of service. These impacts include an increased 10-28
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 22 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
number of emergency and public service calls due to the increased presence of structures, traffic, and population. The project proponents/developers will be expected to provide for a proportional mitigation to these impacts via capit al improvements and/or impact fees.

44. Fire Department emergency vehicle apparatus access road locations and design shall be in accordance with the California Fire Code, City of Rancho Mirage Municipal Code, and Riverside County Fire Department Standards. P lans must be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to building permit issuance.

45. Fire Department water system(s) for fire protection shall be in accordance with the California Fire Code, City of Rancho Mirage Municipal and Riversid e County Fire Department Standards. Plans must be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval prior to building permit issuance.

46. Prior to Building Permit issuance, the required water system, including all fire hydrant(s), shall be installed, and accepted by the appropriate water agency and the County Fire Department prior to any combustible building material placed on an individual lot. Contact the Fire Department to inspect the required fire flow, street signs, all weather surfaces, and all access and/or secondary access. Approved water plans must be at the job site. 10-29
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 23 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #

FINDINGS
Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM22-0001 (Tentative Tract Map No. 38291)

Pursuant to RMMC Section 16.12.065 Action on tentative tract maps, a tentative tract map may be approved only if the following findings are made:

1. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the City’s General Plan and Section 31 Specific Plan as specified in Section 65451 of the California Government Subdivision Map Act. The current General Plan land use designation for the Project site is Mixed Use (M-U). The M -U zoni ng district is applied to areas appropriate for the integration of commercial, office and residential uses, and subject to the approval of a specific plan to ensure compatible design standards, shared internal circulation, and related considerations. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is a residential land subdivision with a range of densities and its design fulfills the r equirements of the Section 31 S pecific Plan and the underlying M-U zoning district of the General Plan.

2. The design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is consistent with the City’s General Plan, Zoning Ordinance requirements, and the Section 31 Specific Plan , as conditioned .

As set forth in the above analysis, the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the City’s General Plan, zoning, Section 31 Specific Plan, and all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. No variances or exceptions are requested. No development is being proposed in conjunction with the proposed subdivision.

3. The site is physically suitable for the type of development, as conditioned; the Project Site is a part of the overall vacant 618-acre Section 31 site bound by existing public streets that is being master planned in a comprehensive manner to ensure compatibility betwe en land uses, circulation, recreational amenities, and utilities . Through the implementation of the Section 31 Specific Plan, the master planned community will be designed to accommodate a blend of land uses through complementary Planning Areas and Land Use Categories and provides for a mixture of housing products and densities with intensity and density increasing towards the center of Section 31.

4. The site is physically suitable for the proposed density of development, as conditioned ; because the Project will not exceed the maximum of 1,932 dwelling units permitted by the Section 31 Specific Plan and evaluated by the Specific Plan EIR. The general density structure will not be intensified. The master planned community has been designed to accommodate a blend of land uses through complementary Planning Areas and Land Use Categories and provides for a mixture of housing products and densities with density increasing towards the center of Section 31. As set forth in the above analysis, the proposed subdivision is in conformance with the City’s General Plan, zoning, Section 31 Specific Plan , and all applicable requirements of the Subdivision Map Act. The Project complies with the City’s development standards. No variances or exceptions are requested. No development is being proposed in conjunction with the proposed subdivision.

5. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat . 10-30
DATE: July 14, 2022 EA22-0002 & TTM22-0001 Page 24 of 24

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Planning Commission Staff Report AGENDA ITEM #
An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was adopted for the Section 31 Specific Plan on December 5, 2019. The City Council passed Resolution No. 2019-65 to adopt Findings of Fact, approve the Statement of Overriding Considerations, and certify the Section 31 Final EIR. The effects of the Section 31 Specific Plan , including the scope of the proposed Tentative Map, were examined in the Final EIR, and all feasible mitigation measures and alternatives developed and identified in the Final EIR have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this project. No development is being pr oposed in conjunction with the proposed subdivision. Implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the Final EIR shall be required for future developments and are being implemented during rough grading in Phase 1A.

6. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, as conditioned. As part of the subdivision review, staff sent notices to the Public Works Department, Riverside County Fire Marshal’s Office, and all public utility companies and service agencies regarding the proposed subdivision on January 26, 2022.

All agencies will be expected to provide service to the proposed parcels, including providers of gas, electrical, water, sewer, and cable telecommunication service s. No public health impacts are expected.

7. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision, as conditioned . As part of the subdivision review, staff sent notices to the Public Works Department, Riverside County Fire Marshal’s Office, and all public utility companies and service agencies regarding the proposed subdivision on January 26, 2022.

Any received comments have been incorporated into the staff report and the Conditions of Approval. The Tentative Map has been conditioned to record any necessary easements and abandon existing easements that are deemed unnecessary by the City Engineer. The incremental i mpacts of the project on service system capacities are mitigated by the dedications and public improvements required within the Conditions of Approval requiring all necessary dedications and public improvements to be in accordance with the City’s adopted General Plan and Section 31 Specific Plan.

8. The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Section 31 Specific Plan entitlement package was reviewed in compliance with CEQA, and the Section 31 Specific Plan EIR (SCH No. 2018081074) was certified on December 5, 2019. This Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) , specifically subdivision (c) Residential Projects Implementing Specific Plans. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is within the scope of the project covered by the certified EIR for the Section 31 Specific Plan and is not proposing to exceed the maximum of 1,932 dwelling units permitted by the Section 31 Specific Plan and evaluated by the Specific Plan EIR.

The Section 31 Spe cific Plan density range for the Project Site is 20 to 60 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The Project is proposing a density range of 4 to 39 du/ac, and therefore is not proposing to intensify the general density structure. The effects of the implementation of the Section 31 Specific Plan were examined in the EIR and all feasible mitigation measures and alternatives developed and identified in the Final EIR have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this Project. 10-31

PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
THURSDAY, JULY 14, 2022 - 2:00 P.M.

DRAFT MINUTES

Meeting Location

City of Rancho Mirage
City Hall - Council Chamber
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Remote Access Information iii
Zoom Link:
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87400302920?pwd=0
WN6x_4ljLUeumf5k1FyEtq85B-JaD.1

Passcode: 091894
Webinar ID: 874 0030 2920
Call-In No.: 1 669 900 9128
CALL TO ORDER – 2:00 P.M.
a) Flag Salute Led by Commissioner Grey
b) Roll Call: Agostini, Bryant, Chanter, Grey, Maxwell – All present (Bryant, Chanter, and Maxwell via telecommunication)

COMMISSIONER COMMENT S

Commissioner Agostini expressed excitement for the City’s recently approved turf rebate program.

Commissioner Bryant questioned the proper procedures in the event Commissioner Chanter experiences connection issues . Colin Kirkpatrick , Deputy City Attorney , noted that as long as Commissioner Chanter can hear the reports and comments made throughout the meeting she can continue to participate.

NON-AGENDA PUBLIC

COMMENTS

Rob Bergstein (via telecommunication), Rancho Mirage resident, emphasized there are no proposed affordable housing units for the Section 31 development.

APPROVAL OF MINUTES –
June 23, 2022, Regular Meeting

MOVED/SECONDED BY GREY/AGOSTINI TO APPROVE THE JUNE 23, 2022 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.

PUBLIC HEARING

1. Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22- 0002 and Ten tative Tract Map Case No.

TTM22-0001. Applicant: MSA Consulting, Inc. on behalf of EC Rancho Mirage Holding LP – CEQA Action: Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan). A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the County of Riverside. Consideration to subdivide 70.44 acres within the Section 31 Specific Plan into 187 single-family residential lots, 4 remainder ATTACHMENT 5
10-32
lots, as well as lots for open space, recreation, private streets, and a Coachella Valley Water District well site. Located at the southwest corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive (APNs: 685-220-016, 685-220-017, 685-220-018, & 685-220-019).

Joy Tsai, Associate Planner, presented the staff report.

Commissioner Chanter confirmed with Majna Dukic, Director of Development Services, that she could hear everything that was stated throughout the staff report.

Vice-Chair Grey questioned if there were requirements for the Crystal Lagoon to be completed and operational prior to the issuance of building permits or certificate of occupancy for the tract homes.

Ms. Dukic, in response to Vice-Chair Grey, stated the Crystal Lagoon is required to be built within phase one. Vice-Chair Grey highlighted water usage concerns as expressed by a public comment letter submitted by Ms. Callimanis and asked for staff comments . Ms. Dukic, in response to Vice- Chair Grey, noted the Environmental Impact Report found that the proposed water usage for the project was a less than significant impact. Vice-Chair Grey noted the property was previously entitled for 3 golf courses, which would use more water than the proposed lagoon.

Commissioner Bryant questioned if the private entrances to the development will be located on Bob Hope Drive and Gerald Ford Drive, with public entrances on Monterey Avenue. Ms. Tsai responded to Commissioner Bryant confirming the locations for public and private entr ances. Commissioner Bryant confirmed with Ms. Dukic that all the corresponding utility companies have confirmed their ability to serve the development. Commissioner Bryant questioned if there were conditions in place for a distance requirement between thorny plants and the pedestrian walkway s. Ms. Dukic confirmed that Condition of Approval #11 requires vegetation with spikes that may be harmful to pedestrians to be a minimum of 3 feet away from walkways . Commissioner Bryant and Ms. Tsai confirmed the sidewalk width is proposed to match the City’s standard of eight feet. Commissioner Bryant and Ms. Tsai discussed the proposed wall height of seven feet, which will block public view into the property.

Public comment:

S. Wilson, member of the public, emphasized the importance of providing clean drinking water for residents of the valley and highlighted the water usage of the proposed development.

Alena Callimanis, member of the public , expressed concerns that the calculations by MSA Consulting Inc. for the Crystal Lagoon’s water usage were far too low. Ms. Callimanis stated the Environmental Impact Report was reviewed in 2019, noting that the environmental circumstance of the Coachella Valley have dramatically changed within the last 3 years. Ms. Callimanis expressed a lack of confidence in the developer’s ability to build and maintain the Crystal Lagoon.

Eddie Kilani, Rancho Mirage resident, questioned if utilities would be installed along Vista Del Sol.

Dorian Whitney (via telecommunication), member of the public, expressed opposition to the project, citing the nation’s wealth gap. Mr. Whitney expressed the need for affordable housing in the valley and noted his opposition to Disney coming to the valley.

Mary S. Alexander, Executive Vice President & General Counsel at DMB Development and applicant r
epresentative, noted that the Section 31 Specific Plan has already been approved and the environmental impact report certified. Ms. Alexander noted that DMB has agreed to reduce the size of the Crystal Lagoon and to provide drought tolerant landscaping. Ms. Alexander also noted 10-33
the age restrictions for a portion of the proposed homes.

Commissioner Chanter questioned the process for reconsidering an Environmental Impact Report.

Ms. Dukic stated in response to Commissioner Chanter that the overall project has not changed so there will not be a consideration of another Environmental Impact Report.

Commissioner Agostini questioned the Coachella Valley Water District’s well visibility on Gerald Ford Drive. Paul Depalatis, Director of Planning Services at MSA Consulting Inc., noted the well is not very tall and will be properly screened from public view.

Vice-Chair Grey questioned the project’s plans if water restrictions are tightened. Ms. Alexander in response to Vice-Chair Grey stated there is a drought contingency plan that has been developed for that particular purpose.

Commissioner Bryant requested that Ms. Alexander explain Disney’s role with the development.

Ms. Alexander stated Disney will be the owner and operator of the amenities within the development, which will be provided for the residents of the community with some limited public access. Ms. Alexander highlighted that there is a Crystal L agoon already in operation in Dubai, emphasizing that C rystal Lagoons have been successfully built and managed in similar desert climates. Ms. Alexander clarified with Commissioner Bryant the age restriction on the homes being developed for the community.

Commissioner Bryant clarified with Ms. Dukic that the Commission is only voting on the tentative tract map, which Ms. Dukic affirmed.

Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager, reminded the Commission that the Section 31 Specific Plan was approved in 2019 and all documents related to the project are available on the City’s website.

Mr. Depalatis, noted sewer would be extended to Vista Del Sol.

MOVED/SECONDED BY GREY/BRYANT TO RECOMMEND TO THE CITY COUNCIL:

1. THE FILING OF A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION BASED ON ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CASE NO. EA22 -0002 AND PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15182 FOR PROJECTS PURSUANT TO A SPECIFIC PLAN; AND,

2. APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP CASE NO. TTM22-0001 (TTM38291), SUBJECT

TO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND BASED ON THE CONTENT AND FINDINGS IN THE STAFF REPORT.

MOTION CARRIED 5/0.

2. Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22- 0010 and T
entative Parcel Map Case No.

TPM22-0003 (TPM38315). Applicant: Palomino Four, LLC – CEQA Action: Section 15315 Class 15 (Minor Land Divisions). A Notice of Exemption will be filed with the County of Riverside. Consideration to subdivide a 1.03- acre parcel into four residential parcels. Located at the northwest corner of Palomino Lane and Cypress Lane ( APN: 674- 110-018).

Ben Torres, Planning Manager, presented the staff report. 10-34
Commissioner Bryant questioned if he has a conflict of interest given one of the neighbors to the property is his doctor . Deputy City Attorney Kirkpatrick stated it is not a conflict of interest f or Commissioner Bryant for so long as Commissioner Bryant believes it will not impact his judgement.

Public comment:

Brooke Kettner, Rancho Mirage resident, spoke in opposition to the project , citing concerns with the proposed increase in housing density for the property.

Brad Anderson, Rancho Mirage resident, stated he was opposed to the project , citing the housing density as a point of concern. Mr. Anderson concluded his comments stating Commissioner Bryant should recuse himself.

Robert Smith, Chair of the MSA Consulting Inc. Board and applicant representative, described the proposed lot size as in proportion to the lot sizes in the surrounding neighborhood.

Commissioner Bryant questioned if the zoning and existing codes give the applicant the right to subdivide the property. Mr. Torres in response to Commissioner Bryant stated yes, the development standards have been met.

Samuel Lipetz ( via telecommunication) stated he believes his public comments will not make a difference on the decision of the Commission and withheld further comments.

Paul Faxon (via telecommunication), Rancho Mirage resident, noted the Commission has very little discretion for the project given the development standards. Mr. Faxon requested the Commission consider the height of the proposed structures and potential construction noise impacts on neighbors.

Commissioner Bryant questioned if the future homes would need to go through the P lanning Commission and City Council for approval. Ms. Dukic stated that the future homes would need to go through the Commission and City Council only if the homes exceed 20 feet in height.

MOVED/SECONDED BY AGOSTINI/GREY TO APPROVE:

1. THE FILING OF A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES §15315 AND ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT CASE NO. EA22 -0010; AND

2. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP CASE NO. TPM 22-0003 (TPM38315), SUBJECT TO THE

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL AND BASED ON THE CONTENT AND FINDINGS IN THE STAFF REPORT.

MOTION CARRIED 4/0 WITH COMMISSIONER CHANTER ABSTAINED.

ADJOURNMENT

With no further business to consider the Planning Commission adjourned the meeting at 3:14 p.m.

Prepared by: Tyler Fowlkes, Administrative Analyst
Date Approved by Planning Commission:
10-35
ATTACHMENT 6
10-36
Joy Tsai
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Good morning,
Kristie Ramos, CMC
Thursday, July 14, 2022 9:43 AM
Alena Callimanis
Re: Regarding Speaking at the Planning Commission Meeting July 14 Public Session Item Number 1
July 14 Callimanis Rancho Mirage letterv2 .pdf
Your letter will be provided to the Planning Commissioner s prior to their meeting and be made available to the public. No need to bring copies.

If you attend in person, you may hold up and/or distribute copies of your chart. If you attend via zoom, it will only be audio. You will not be seen on the screen.

Best,
Sent from my iPhone
Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone : 760-324-4511 Ext. 488
E-mail: [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
www.RanchoMirageCa .gov

TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) On Jul 14, 2022, at 9:15 AM, Alena Callim anis <acallimani [email protected] > wrote:

CAUTION: This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Good day. I would like to speak at the Public Hearing today on item number 1, Section 31. I am 1 10-37
attaching a letter that I want to review with the Commissioners. Since the letter is longer than my three minute allotted time, is it possible for the Commissioners to see and read this before I speak? Also, if I can get out of work, I will come in person. But I wanted to confirm I can still speak over zoom if required. If I come in person, can I create charts that can be displayed during the meeting? Or are charts from the public not allowed to be displayed. I suspect over Zoom, you will not display charts of mine, is that correct? So I wanted to know if there was a difference based on me being there in person or over zoom as far as charts.

Thank you so much for your help. If I come in person, should I bring copies of my letter to distribute? Thanks!
Alena Callimanis
81469 Rustic Canyon Dr
La Quinta, CA 92253
919 606-6164
2 10-38
July 14, 2022

RECEIVED
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DfPT
22 JUL ll• PH I: 35
To: Planning Commissioners and Planning Staff, City of Rancho Mirage Re: Questions you need technically answered by Crystal Lagoons and CVWD before you approve anything further for the Section 31 Project
Thank you for the opportunity to speak to you and thank you for your dedication to the City of Rancho Mirage. You should not make any further decisions on this project until you understand the true technical answers to the questions I raise below.

The Crystal Lagoon is the unifying amenity for the entire project. I have very serious concerns that the developer has not addressed regarding the Lagoon which could impact the viability of the entire project. You must ensure that the developer does not address these concerns with their typical marketing-speak, but with technical proof that these concerns can be resolved.

The Crystal Lagoon website is boasting about the largest Crystal Lagoon project that will be opening soon in Europe. It is found in Spain and it will be 4 acres. That is four acres, not 24 acres like you will have in Rancho Mirage.

The developer has no experience with a lagoon as big as yours that uses fresh water .

Their 34 acre, 62 million gallon lagoon in Egypt uses salt water from an underground aquifer that cannot be used for any other purpose because of its salinity. That means they have NO concerns for chlorination, since you don't chlorinate sea water . They have no concerns for the water getting too hot because they can just pump more groundwater into the lagoon at any time to cool the lagoon. They don't need to worry about evaporation because they have a ready supply of cool underground salty aquifer water they can pump in at any time.

Your 24 acre lagoon is 18 football fields with end zones. Have you ever heard anyone speak about how much water it will take to fill it? It is not listed anywhere. I calculate it to be about 40 million gallons of water, or about 332 Million sixteen-ounce bottles of water, based on the 62 million gallons that the Crystal Lagoon in Egypt uses to fill their 34 acre salt water lagoon .

If Crystal Lagoons is planning on putting their proprietary evaporation film technology on the pool to mitigate evaporation, as was written in the 2019 Water Assessment, that is not allowed per Zoe Rodriguez Del Rey, CVWD Water Resources Manager. So that would invalidate the water calculations in the WSA for the project. In addition, after reviewing the WSA, Ms. Del Rey agreed that MSA had mistakenly undercalculated evaporation at the Lagoon. I was not allowed to ask for a recalculation. That would be up to you. In a quick redo of the calculation I did using the CVWD formula, MSA calculated 34 million gallons of evaporation for the original 34 acre lagoon. I calculate 57 million gallons for the smaller 24 acre lagoon. So more evaporation every year than it takes to originally fill it. And much higher than in the original WSA.

Another major issue: Crystal Lagoons touts patented technology that is in various places within the lagoon that monitors and maintains chemical levels. From their website: "The application of additives is determined electronically by injectors and sensors strategically located in the lagoon. This operation is managed online by the Crystal Lagoons Control Center, so that the presence of qualified personnel for the 10-39
application of the additive s and the monitoring of the water quality of the lagoon is not necessary".

Can you please ask the developer what happens when the lagoon has up to 1 to 2 inches of sand in it after a typical windstorm? Crystal Lagoons says they have devices that clean the bottom of the pool. That probably works for the largest lagoon in Europe, 4 acres. How will they clean the bottom of your 24 acre lagoon? I know my iPhone shuts off in excessive heat . What is the effect of our extreme heat on these sensors? Again, real answers not a marketing answer like "sure we can do it" .

What is the back up technology to ensure the pool water is safe in our heat, especially if technology is inactivated by the sand and perhaps even the high heat . Pool water temperatures today are already in the mid-90s due to our heat. Crystal Lagoons says they don't need to circulate water as often as a regular pool. That might be the case if all their technology is working . I suspect you have heard of brain-eating bacteria found in hot, fresh water. You must find out how they will make sure in our sand and heat condition s that the lagoon will stay safe. They cannot cool it by pumping more CVWD well water to keep it cool.

If you go back to the Section 31 EIR, the EIR states that the amount of water needed for the project is excessive and cannot be mitigated . So the mitigation method in the EIR is that the developer will need to purchase more Colorado River water to make up the difference of their overpumping. This assessment was from July 2019, three years ago when the situation with the Colorado River Basin wasn't as serious as it is today. There is no extra water for the developer to purchase. You must reevaluate the water usage for this project based on the new drought conditions. CVWD can't just say this is now a 24 acre pool and not a 34 acre pool as was calculated in 2019. Since the evaporation was mis-calculated back then, the new evaporation is at least double the old · evaporation number. This does not include the additional wind evaporation from the additional wind events we are experiencing . Or our hotter days!! That will cause even more evaporation, since the CVWD formula does not account for that.

By the way, the re are new restrictions on building new wells because of the drought.

Are you aware of those? And in CVWD phase three water restrictions, which could happen as early as this year, and as happened during Governor Brown's term, there was a prohibition on filling new pools. This would apply to Crystal Lagoon.

Please don't approve anything else on this project until you understand thoroughly and technical the answers to the questions I have raised in thi s letter .

You need real answers.

Respectfu I ly,
Alena Callimanis
81469 Rustic Canyon Dr.

La Quinta
919 606-6164
10-40
Crystal Lagoon Section 31
Water Concerns
81469 Rustic Canyon Drive
La Quinta, CA 92253
919 606-6164
July 14, 2022
Alena Callimanis
Bachelor of Science Physics Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Masters Degree Physics Stony Brook University
Concerned La Quinta Full Time Resident
1 10-41

WATER SUPPLY ASSESSMENT
and

WATER SUPPLY VERIFICATION
for the Proposed
Section 31 Specific Plan
Prepared for:

Coach<!!la Valley Wat~Oistrict
P .0. Box 1058
Coachella, California 92236
Pr"~red by:

MSA Consulting, Inc.
,4200 Bob Hope Drive
Rar>eho Mirage, earrtomia 92270
July:201S
2 10-42
Original Water Calculation in WSA was
incorrect
• I contacted Zoe Rodriguez del Rey that the calculation for evaporation in the WSA seemed to low
• She confirmed that the number calculated by MSA Consulting was inaccurate and that the City needs to request the recalculation • The calculation in the WSA was for a 34 acre lagoon
• However, the calculation in the WSA is even too low for a 24 acre lagoon
• So it is inaccurate to state that since the lagoon is 10 acres smaller, the water calculation is too high
3 10-43
~IM
31 Spw-ifi£
Jl'ime
WSA
Table

2.0-3
Outdoor
W
ater
Demand
La
.nd
I.la
. ,;fHol»l
-
-
-
..

HGl:ei
-R»m?i
OfflOtt
Bulldtng
~
Hcte!
-CD."°;"
mMJal
UJ.!!!
R81:1ml.S
-Bex:h
Cllb
iili'OW
Ope!ISJiitte-
ltS
O,if:JertliS
-
Sma
ll
id
SFD
{CIU!.t-
SFC
-~Lilt
~
~
Resldert
.111
-Estat.e
lo:

SFO
-~
RH
lll♦
nh
l I
. Fi:8~
-:'c'
umm
L.ct
sro-·
_':;:R•daura
R61Y.:l'lll':t& ~oammero
On.m
nc
iia)
-
..
·-
A.ol'eat19 _!_Ag

15.lJ!l 1'im si~ 33
:*
2!
.<3-:J

29.00 1.2
. .9!l
Hi
.~

35. .!iS
--43
. .53
.;n.ii'
·11
mr 12.33
~ em. D'¥,
i~
~ 4~ €:,,0 6S'ti ,;;.--,. '=~ ~
,...,._::to_t._
~ ~
1~.33
----;;m;,
1-3.Sll iii:•
4m.

Ta'-)
o~
A1111111a
Collllllmptl~ _
JAFYJ
_
.e1:t°1
76A-5'
&:_73
--
~13,
~
!l
'91.~
_l)jJ
-91.~
1~
,977
.Q
s.::a..as;.!l!I ~S96..!l!l 3:i2,41~
t2ll
C.1
.3:M-...3'3
,,,~
-s.310..
9!!
~]ID
s
an 6.s.J 1":f"-f ~S.::;!5 ~
-1

39..17 Z..'-...
-95
nss 74-4.5 1!1!!
-:S-
-
---
1::2.~
1 V
:ll:im'
~
a:z..SD
-Cd~'"
..
~$.93 215
,'536
.11
ln
.5:14-
. .t:-3
1,-041.291M

22..91 15.33
:B
.D!l
tt-UM
u-tli'J
-
l.cl!QOC
O!i
a p;p
i=;:i
~rl'!t~
7 e.:imt:M:
m
"edua!
~,;:i;xiraticm
t,_,.
a:.
much
uctio
n,
pR:duru
~
or1
LI!!ia:
. ~d
!:~re
,:fcm~ted
up
to

11.sri-31,
r
e:
opp--·
-
4 10-44
This was included in the Section 31 documentation.

Per Ms. Rodriguez del Rey, the evaporation additives
cannot be considered for Crystal Lagoon and should
not be used to change evaporation numbers.
• Easy to apply
■ Cost•eftective
«ch K'aterGuard
·• Uqutd blanlU!f to sa1111 water
~~--~~
?. 0
Introducing ..... WaterGuard!
~ is Ill unique iqud which s~ rMKthe l:i.rfl!C8
of wm,;;r to foon a wiy trun film llfld rGdJce ewporation.

Many pe(lp8 019 rarr.i,-Wllh ~ the Im sicon9 booed
liquid for~ control. W.n!l!GuarO is a r'l!l'lv, mprovoo fOlmllaTlcm manufacttnld by Aquatain Producls Pity Lid \mCh is 8\.'Bl'l moo, 9118Ctiua fYld rn0l'9 economiCal for rll0..K¥IQ 8ll.JpOr~from farm d.rrc, l'll)QM)im and pool&.
~ ~ pnxlllo80 from polYl'Mr.
whlen ,ll!)li __ __, ~ -
tney come 11'1 .C01'1111Ct Witt> tne --TniG
-11'1~~~-­me ~ forming .a Uquio ·-to
NK'IUC:8~
--·110m~-­,.~~-ol-=l""41CSI
emJIY..lOOa,lp108 lll!IG to~ WW'/
aay ;n a-. and • one "9ct:n <1a111
can lOOe up to 80.000 lilnla wm• tMt IS
-bllriim31:.atld9'QWingctcpc
T"'2"'ln1!!eUSh:MI...-~
saving,.of50$6and-..

FA'.ra'flarSNDN3WC-'ft.D"l\me
--P!yl.ld
PO Eb< 1007 J<)<l<tOO VlC 34-W AUSTRAUA.

Yl<:b:www~em:,;t~
The a>mpc,ne,11;: of W':llllrGu:w -- """"""'"'-11/)d """"f of tnan are u:;ec, In looo anti ~ ~
~ appilc3tion far~ ofW3terGlatl
fardrtnl$>g-1Sctlr0nllyuncwwsy.
(lnj:e blDrn r,, n ~. 'IIS wry .... isism
IO~ltwtll-""""1<1~
°""' Ille sur.ace. QUI W9 not llUIIG up .~
aneenc1o1e.-000y.1n tne <NW111ol
r.11n. ""' --Will not t>e afllacred u •
wlH allow t1111 rain to go lntougll wlthaut
~-fl!m.
w.i..au,,,, can &ff1PIY 0e pa.nu «i ii>
Ille -d...dty from 11W -1lnCI • will
,:;pr9:l<lrapidly"""""'lh8""'3ca. ""'~
appocallQo::. ft CS\ alt.o ""' applieO 'af ~
5 10-45
CITY Of MIRAGE:
[;
Prepared For:

City of Rancho Mirage
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, California 92270
Environmental Impact Report
Secti;on 311 ·s·pe€ific Plan
6 10-46
~
In
the
EIR
for Section
31,
it
says
that
this
project
will
substantially
decrease
ground
water
supplies.

So
they
are
solving
the
problem
by
having
the
developer
pay
fees
to
replenish
the
aquifer.

With
the
Colorado
River
Basin
in
such
a
severe
drought,
there
is
no
Colorado
River
water
to
buy
Project
Impacts
Be
located
within
an
airport
land
use
plan
or,
where
such
a
plan
has
not
been
adopted,
within
two
miles
of
a
public
airport
or
public
use
airport,
would
the
project
result
in
a
safety
hazard
or
excessive
noise
for
people
residing
or
working
in
the
project
area?
Result
in
an
impaired
implementation
of
or
physically
interference
with
an
adopted
emergency
response
plan
or
emergency
evacuation
plan?
Result
in
the
exposure
of
people
or
structures,
either
directly
or
indirectly,
to
a
significant
risk
of
loss,
injury
or
death
involving
wild/and
fires?
Significant
.

Potentially Significant. Less
than
Significant.

Violate
any
water
quality
standards
or
Less
than
waste
discharge
requirements
or
Significant
.
ntially
decrease
groundwater
s
or
interfere
substantially
with
dwater
recharge
such
that
the
may
impede
sustainable
µndwater
management
of
the
basin?
MJtlption
Measures
No
mitigation
measures
are
necessary.

Incorporation
of
Mitigation
Measure
MM

5.8•1
{above)
and
Mitigation
Measure
MM

5.15·1
{below).

No
mitigation
measures
are
necessary.

Hydrolocv
and
Water
Quality
MM

5.9-1:
{
The
Project
Applicant
shall
pay
groundwater
replenishm
D
to
offset
the
Grand
Oasis
lagoon
Impact
wit
.h
Mitlption Less
than
Significant. Less
than
Significant. Less
than
Significant. Less
than
Significant. Less
than
Significant.
7 10-47
..

With
the
WSA
based
on
inaccurate
data
and
the
changes
that
have
happened
to
water
supplies
since
2019,
the
EIR
cannot
be
considered
valid
anymore
with
respect
to
water
You
need
to
resolve
this
and
all
the
other
questions
I raised
in
the
letter
to
you
dated
July
14,2022
8 10-48
Joy Tsai
From:

Sent:

To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Ben Torres
Thursday, July 14, 2022 1 :29 PM
Joy Tsai
FW: Correspondence from Californians for Homeownership, Inc. 2022-07-14 - Letter to Planning Commission re Item 1.pdf; 2022-07-14 - Letter to Planning Commission re Item 2.pdf
Ben Torres
Planning Manager
Phone: 760-328-2266 Ext. 253
E-mail: [email protected]
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
www.RanchoMirageCa .gov

TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: Kristie Ramos, CMC <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 1:22 PM
To: Ben Torres <[email protected]>
Cc: Majna Dukie <[email protected]>
Subject: FW: Correspondence from Californians for Homeownership, Inc.

Please see below/attached.

Kristie Ramos, CMC
City Clerk
Phone: 760-324 -4511 Ext. 488
E-mail: kristier@RanchoMirageCA .gov
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
www.RanchoMirageCa .gov
1 10-49

TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: admin@caforhomes .org <admin@caforhomes .org>
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2022 1:20 PM
To: Kristie Ramos, CMC <kristier@RanchoMirageCA .gov>
Subject: Re: Correspondence from Californians for Homeownership, Inc.

CAUTION: This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage. DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you I recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

To the Planning Commission:

Please see the attached letters dated July 14, 2022 in regards to items 1 and 2 in today's Planning Commission meeting agenda.

Sincerely,
Christian Garcia
Californians for Homeownership
525 S. Virgil Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90020
[email protected]
Tel: (213) 739-8206
Californians for Homeownership is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that works to address California's housing crisis through impact litigation and other legal tools.
2 10-50

CALIFORNIANS FOR

HOMEOWNERSHIP

VIA EMAIL
Planning Commission
City of Rancho Mirage
69-825 Highway 11 I
Rancho Mirage , CA 92270
RECEIVED ,. 1'
CEVELOPMENT SERVlvES OEr
22 JUL 14 PM \: 3S
July 14, 2022
Emai l: c/o KristieR @RanchoMirageCA .gov
RE: Southwest Corner of Monterey Ave. and Gerald Ford Dr.

CHRISTIAN GARCIA
[email protected]
TEL: (213) 739-8206
APNs: 685-22 0-016, 685-220-01 7, 685-220-0 18, & 685-220 -019 To the Planning Commission:

Californians for Homeownership is a 50 I (c)(3) organization devoted to using lega l tools to address Ca lifornia 's housing crisis. We are writing regarding the Monterey Ave. and Gerald Ford Dr. project. The City's approval of this project is governed by the Housing Accountabi lity Act, Government Code Section 65589.5. For the purposes of Government Code Section 65589.5(k)(2), this letter constitutes our written comments submitted in connection with the project.

The Housing Accountabi lity Act generally requires the City to approve a housing development project unless the project fails to comp ly with "app licable, objective general plan, zoning, and subdivision standards and criteria, including design review standards , in effect at the time that the app lication was deemed complete. " Gov. Code § 65589.50)(1). To count as "objective, " a standard must "invo lve[ e] no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and be[] uniformly verifiable by reference to an externa l and uniform benchmark or criterion ava ilable and knowable by both the development app licant or proponent and the public official. " Gov. Code§ 65589.5(h)(8). In making this determination , the City must approve the project if the evidence "would allow a reasonable person to conclude" that the project met the relevant standard.

Gov. Code§ 65589 .5(f)(4) . Projects subject to modified standards pursuant to a density bonus are judged against the City's standards as modified . Gov. Code § 65589.50)(3).

The City is subject to strict timing requirements under the Act. If the City desires to find that a project is inconsistent with any of its land use standards, it must issue written findings to that effect within 30 to 60 days after the application to develop the project is determined to be comp lete. Gov . Code§ 65589.5U)(2)(A). If the City fails to do so, the project is deemed consistent with those standards. Gov. Code § 65589.5U)(2)(B).
525 S. Vir gi l Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90020
10-51
I •
July 14, 2022

Page 2 ends

If the City determines that a project is consistent with its objective standards, or a project is deemed consistent with such standards , but the City nevertheless proposes to reject it, it must make written findings , supported by a preponderance of the evidence, that the project would have a "specific, adverse impact upon the public health or safety ," meaning that the project would have "a significant, quantifiable , direct, and unavoidable impact , based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete. " Gov. Code§ 65589 .5U)(l)(A); see Gov. Code§ 65589.5(k)(l)(A)(i)(Il).

Once again, "objective " means "invo lving no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and being uniformly verifiab le by reference to an externa l and uniform benchmark or criterion avai lable and knowable by both the development applicant or proponent and the public official." Gov. Code § 65589.5(h)(8).

Even if the City identifies lega lly sufficient health and safety concerns about a project, it may only reject the project if " [t]here is no feasible method to satisfactori ly mitigate or avoid the adverse impact ... other than the disapproval of the housing development project .... " Gov.

Code§ 65589.5U)(l)(B). Thus , before rejecting a project , the City must cons ider all reasonable measures that cou ld be used to mitigate the impact at issue.

For projects that provide hou sing for lower-income families, the Act is even more restrictive. In many cases, the City must approve such a project even if it fails to meet the City's objective land use standards. See Gov. Code § 65589.5(d).

These provisions app ly to the full range of housing types , including sing le-fam ily homes, market-rate multifamily projects , and mixed-use developments. Gov. Code § 65589.5(h)(2); see Honchariw v. Cty. of Stanislaus , 200 Ca l. App. 4th I 066 , I 074-76 (2011 ). And the Legislature has directed that the Act be "interpreted and implemented in a manner to afford the fullest possible weight to the interest of, and the approval and provision of, hou sing." Gov . Code § 65589.5(a)(2)(L).

When a loca lity rejects or downsizes a housing development project without complying with the rules described above , the action may be challenged in court in a writ under Code of Civ il Procedure Sectio n I 094 .5. Gov. Code § 65589 .5(m). The legislature has significant ly reformed this process over the last few years in an effort to increase comp liance. Today , the law provides a private right of action to non-profit organizations like Ca liforni ans for Homeownership . Gov .

Code§ 65589.5(k). A non-profit organization can sue without the invo lvement or approva l of the project applicant , to protect the public's interest in the development of new housing. A locality that is s ued to enforce Section 65589.5 must prepare the administrative record itself, at its own expense, within 30 days after service of the petition . Gov. Code § 65589.5(m) . And if an enforceme nt lawsu it brought by a non-profit organization is successfu l, the locality must pay the organization's attorneys' fees . Gov . Code § 65589.5(k)(2). In certa in cases, the court will also impose fines that start at$ I 0,000 per proposed housing unit. Gov. Code § 65589.5(k)( I )(B)(i). 525 S. Virgil Avenue
Los Angel es, CA 90020 CALIFORNIANS FOR HOMEOWNERSHIP
10-52
July 14, 2022

Page 3 ends

In recent years, there have been a number of successful lawsuits to enforce these rules:
• In Honchariw, 200 Cal. App. 4th I 066, the Court of Appeal vacated the County of Stanislaus's denial of an application to subdivide a parcel into eight lots for the development of market-rate housing. The court held that the county did not identify any objective standards that the proposed subdivision would not meet, and therefore violated the Housing Accountability Act in denying the application. • In Eden Housing, Inc. v. Town of Los Gatos, Santa Clara County Superior Court Case No. 16CV300733, the court determined that Los Gatos had improperly denied a subdivision application based on subjective factors. The court found that the factors cited by the town, such as the quality of the site design, the unit mix, and the anticipated cost of the units , were not objective because they did not refer to specific, mandatory criteria to which the applicant could conform. • San Francisco Bay Area Renters Federation v. Berkeley City Council, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RGI 6834448, was the final in a series of cases relating to Berkeley's denial of an application to build three single family homes and its pretextual denial of a demolition permit to enable the project. The Court ordered the city to approve the project and to pay $44,000 in attorneys' fees. • In 40 Main Street Offices v. City of Los Altos, Santa Clara County Superior Court Consolidated Case Nos . l 9CV349845 & 19CV350422, the court determined that the Los Altos violated the Housing Accountability Act, among other state housing laws, by failing to identify objective land use criteria to justify denying a mixed­ use residential and commercial project. The City was ultimately forced to pay approximately$ I million in delay compensation and attorneys' fees in the case. • In Californians for Homeownership v. City of Huntington Beach, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 30-2019-01107760-CU-WM-CJC, a case brought by our organization, the court ruled that Huntington Beach violated the Housing Accountability Act when it rejected a 48-unit condominium project based on vague concerns about health and safety. Following the decision, the City agreed to pay $600,000 in attorneys' fees to our organization and two other plaintiffs.

In other cases, localities have settled lawsuits by agreeing to approve the subject projects and pay tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal expenses. 525 S . Virgil Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90020
Sincerely,
Christian Garcia

CALIFORNIANS FOR HOM EOWNERSHIP
10-53
Joy Tsai
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

Ben Torres
Wednesday, August 3, 2022 11 :20 AM
Colin Kirkpatrick
Majna Dukie; Joy Tsai
FW: SWRCC - [City of Rancho Mirage, Catino Disney Master-Planned Community) Comment Letter
Ben Torres
Planning Manager
Phone: 760-328-2266 Ext. 253
E-mail: bent@RanchoMirageCA .gov
69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, California, 92270
www.RanchoMirageCa .gov

TRANSPARENCY NOTICE
Some or all of the content of this e-mail and its attachments may be subject to disclosure pursuant to the Californi a Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250, et seq.) From: Naira Soghbatyan <naira@m itcht sailaw.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2022 11:17 AM
To: Charles Townsend <Charlest@RanchoM irageCA.gov>; Richard W. Kite <[email protected]>; Steve Downs <[email protected]>; Iris Smotrich <[email protected]>; Ted Weill <tedw@RanchoM irageCA.gov>; Kristie Ramos, CMC <kristier@RanchoM irageCA.gov>; Ben Torres <[email protected]>
Cc: Mitchell Tsai <mitch@mitchtsai law.com >; Malou Reyes <malou@mitchtsai law.com>; Rebekah Youngblood <rebekah@m itcht sailaw.com>; Barrie Brown Martinez <barrie@mitchtsai law.com >; Steven Thong <steven@mitchtsai law.com>; Maria Sarmiento <maria@mitchtsa ilaw.com>; Hind Baki <hind@mitchtsai law.com > Subject: Re: SWRCC - [City of Rancho Mirage, Catino Disney Master-Planned Community ] Comment Letter CAUTION. This email originated from outside The City of Rancho Mirage . DO NOT CLICK links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Please also note that our Comment Letter conta ins a Cease and Desist Demand & Cure and Correct Request for the Brown Act violation.

Thank you.
1 10-54
Naira Soghbatyan, Esq.

Associate Attorney
Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law
139 South Hudson Avenue Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91101
Phone: (626) 314-3821
Fax: (626) 389-5414
Email: naira@mitchtsailaw .com
Website: http ://www.mitchtsailaw.com
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 9:53 AM Malou Reyes <malou@mitcht sailaw.com> wrote:

Good morning,
Attached please find our comment letter regarding the environm ental assessment and CEQA exempt ion Case No. EA22- 0002 and Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM22-0001 (TTM No. 38291) within a Section 31 Specific Plan.

Please confirm receipt of this email.

Thank you,
Malou
Malou Reyes
Paralegal
Mitche ll M. Tsai, Attorney At Law
139 South Hudson Avenue Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91101
Phone: (626) 314-3821
Fax: (626) 389-5414
Email: [email protected]
Website: http://www.mitchtsailaw .com
*** Our Office Has Recent ly Moved . Please Note New Mailing Address**** CONF IDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages accompany ing it, may contain confident ial information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this message is STRICTLY PROH IBITED and may violate applicable laws including the Electronic Commun ications Privacy Act. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mai l at [email protected] or by telephone at (626) 381-9248 and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading them or saving them to disk. Thank you. 2 VIA E-MAIL
August 3, 2022
Honorable Mayor Charles Townsend,
Mayor Pro Tem Richard Kite, and
City Council Members
City of Rancho Mirage,
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
City of Rancho Mirage
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Em: [email protected]

Chair Murray Bryant of the Planning
Commission and Commissioners
c/o Ben Torres, Planning Manager
City of Rancho Mirage
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
[email protected]
RE: Cease and Desist Demand & Cure and Correct Request, and Objections to Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0002 and Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM22-0001 (TTM No. 38291) within a Section 31 Specific Plan (aka Disney’s Cotino) and its CEQA Exemption.

Honorable Mayor Townsend, Mayor Pro Tem Kite, and City Council Members and Honorable Chair Murray Bryant and Planning Commissioners:

On behalf of the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters (“SWRCC” or “Southwest Carpenters”), my Office is submitting these comments on the environmental assessment and CEQA exemption Case No. EA22-0002 and Tentative Tract Map Case No. TTM22-0001 (TTM No. 38291) within a Section 31 Specific Plan (“Specific Plan,” also known as Disney’s “Cotino” or “Section 31/Cotino”) to subdivide 70.44 acres into 187 single-family residential lots, 4 remainder lots, as well as lots for open space, recreation, private streets, and a CVWD well site at Southwest corner of Monterey Avenue and Gerald Ford Drive APNs: 685-220-016, 685-220-017, 685-220-018, & 685-220-019 (“Project”). The Project seeks respective approvals and CEQA exemption determination from the City of Rancho Mirage (“City” or “Lead

RECEIVED

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPT
8/3/2022 11:17 AM
10-55
Agency”). The Project was recommended for City Council approval and CEQA exemption determination by the Planning Commission on July 14, 2022 and is pending City Council’s final action.

The Southwest Carpenters is a labor union representing more than 50,000 union carpenters in six states, including California, and has a strong interest in well-ordered land use planning, addressing the environmental impacts of development projects and equitable economic development.

Individual members of the Southwest Carpenters live, work and recreate in the area and surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project’s environmental impacts.

SWRCC expressly reserve the right to supplement these comments at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearings and proceedings related to this Project. (Cal. Gov’t Code § 65009(b); Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21177(a); Bakersfield Citizens for Local Control v. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1199-1203; see Galante Vineyards v. Monterey Water Dist. (1997) 60 Cal.App.4th 1109, 1121.) SWRCC incorporate by reference all comments raising issues regarding the Project and its CEQA compliance, submitted prior to the Project approvals. (Citizens for Clean Energy v City of Woodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 191 [finding that any party who has objected to the Project’s environmental documentation may assert any issue timely raised by other parties].)
Moreover, SWRCC request that the Lead Agency provide notice for any and all notices referring or related to the Project issued under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), Cal. Public Resources Code (“PRC”) § 21000 et seq, and the California Planning and Zoning Law (“Planning and Zoning Law”), Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 65000–65010. California Public Resources Code Sections 21092.2, and 21167(f) and Government Code Section 65092 require agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written request for them with the clerk of the agency’s governing body.

The City should require community benefits such as requiring local hire and use of a skilled and trained workforce to build the Project. The City should require the use of workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor Management apprenticeship training program approved by the State of California, or have at least as many hours of on-the- job experience in the applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a 10-56
state approved apprenticeship training program or who are registered apprentices in an apprenticeship training program approved by the State of California.

Community benefits such as local hire and skilled and trained workforce requirements can also be helpful to reduce environmental impacts and improve the positive economic impact of the Project. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project Site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and providing localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants Matt Hagemann and Paul E.

Rosenfeld note:
[A]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction-related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.

March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibits A-C).

Skilled and trained workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board and the UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education concluded:
. . . labor should be considered an investment rather than a cost – and investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California’s workforce can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words, well trained workers are key to delivering emissions reductions and moving California closer to its climate targets.
1 Recently, on May 7, 2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that that the “[u]se of a local state -certified apprenticeship program or a skilled and trained workforce with a local hire component” can result in air pollutant reductions. 2 1 California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at https://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/ wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.pdf. 2 South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 – Warehouse Indirect Source Rule – 10-57
Cities are increasingly adopting local skilled and trained workforce policies and requirements into general plans and municipal codes. For example, the City of Hayward 2040 General Plan requires the City to “promote local hiring . . . to help achieve a more positive jobs-housing balance, and reduce regional commuting, gas consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions.”
3 In fact, the City of Hayward has gone as far as to adopt a Skilled Labor Force policy into its Downtown Specific Plan and municipal code, requiring developments in its Downtown area to require that the City “[c]ontribute to the stabilization of regional construction markets by spurring applicants of housing and nonresidential developments to require contractors to utilize apprentices from state-approved, joint labor-management training programs, . . .”
4 In addition, the City of Hayward requires
all projects 30,000 square feet or larger to “utilize apprentices from state-approved, joint labor-management training programs.”5
Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits. As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008:

People who live and work in the same jurisdiction would be more likely to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.
6 In addition, local hire mandates as well as skill training are critical facets of a strategy to reduce vehicle miles traveled. As planning experts Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to achieve VMT Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule 316 – Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve Supporting Budget Actions, available at http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2021/2021-May7-027.pdf?sfvrsn=10. 3 City of Hayward (2014) Hayward 2040 General Plan Policy Document at p. 3-99, available at https://www.hayward-ca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/General_Plan_FINAL.pdf. 4 City of Hayward (2019) Hayward Downtown Specific Plan at p. 5-24, available at https://www.hayward-ca.gov/sites/default/files/Hayward%20Downtown% 20Specific%20Plan.pdf.
5 City of Hayward Municipal Code, Chapter 10, § 28.5.3.020(C). 6 California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs-Housing Balance at p. 6, available at https://cproundtable.org/static/media/uploads/publications/cpr-jobs- housing.pdf.
10-58
reductions since the skill requirements of available local jobs must be matched to those held by local residents.7 Some municipalities have tied local hire and skilled and trained workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation issues. As Cervero and Duncan note:

In nearly bu ilt-out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and housing is to create local jobs rather than to develop new housing. The city’s First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents, especially for entry- and intermediate-level jobs, and sponsors vocational training to ensure residents are employment-ready. While the program is voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than 3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of approval for development permits.

The City should consider utilizing skilled and trained workforce policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and mitigate greenhouse gas, air quality and transportation impacts.

Also, the City should require the Project to be built to standards exceeding the current 2019 California Green Building Code and 2020 County of Los Angeles Green Building Standards Code to mitigate the Project’s environmental impacts and to advance progress towards the State of California’s environmental goals.

I. THE PROJECT WOULD BE APPROVED IN VIOLATION OF CEQA
AS IT DOES NOT APPLY ALL FEASIBLE MITIGATION.

A. Background Concerning the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA has two basic purposes. First, CEQA is designed to inform decision makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of a project. (CEQA Guidelines § 15002(a)(1).) “Its purpose is to inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made. Thus, the EIR ‘protects not only the environment but also informed self- 7 Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs- Housing Balance or Retail-Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (4), 475-490, 482, available at http://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/UTCT- 825.pdf.
10-59
government.’ [Citation.]” (Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553, 564.) The EIR has been described as “an environmental ‘alarm bell’ whose purpose it is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached ecological points of no return.” (Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 392; Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments (2017) 3 Cal.5th 497, 503 [same].) • EIR
Second, CEQA directs public agencies to avoid or reduce environmental damage when possible by requiring alternatives or mitigation measures. (CEQA Guidelines § 15002(a)(2) and (3); see also, Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay Committee v. Board of Port Com'rs (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1354 (“Berkeley Jets”); Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553; Laurel Heights Improvement Ass’n v. Regents of the University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 400.) The EIR serves to provide public agencies and the public in general with information about the effect that a proposed project is likely to have on the environment and to “identify ways that environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced.” (CEQA Guidelines § 15002(a)(2).) If the project has a significant effect on the environment, the agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has “eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible” and that any unavoidable significant effects on the environment are “acceptable due to overriding concerns” specified in CEQA Pub. Res. Code § 21081. (CEQA Guidelines § 15092(b)(2)(A–B).) While the courts review an EIR using an “abuse of discretion” standard, “the reviewing court is not to ‘uncritically rely on every study or analysis presented by a project proponent in support of its position.’ A ‘clearly inadequate or unsupported study is entitled to no judicial deference.’” (Berkeley Jets, 91 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1355 (emphasis added) (quoting Laurel Heights, 47 Cal.3d at 391, 409 fn. 12).) Drawing this line and determining whether the EIR complies with CEQA’s information disclosure requirements presents a question of law subject to independent review by the courts. (Sierra Club v. Cnty. of Fresno (2018) 6 Cal. 5th 502, 515; Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v.

County of Madera (2011) 199 Cal. App. 4th 48, 102, 131.) As the court stated in Berkeley Jets, 91 Cal.App.4th at 1355:

A prejudicial abuse of discretion occurs “if the failure to include relevant information precludes informed decision- making and informed public participation, thereby thwarting the statutory goals of the EIR process. 10-60
“The preparation and circulation of an EIR is more than a set of technical hurdles for agencies and developers to overcome. The EIR’s function is to ensure that government officials who decide to build or approve a project do so with a full understanding of the environmental consequences and, equally important, that the public is assured those consequences have been taken into account. [Citation.] For the EIR to serve these goals it must present information so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed, and the public must be given an adequate opportunity to comment on that presentation before the decision to go forward is made.” (Communities for a Better Environment v. Richmond (2010) 184 Cal. App. 4th 70, 80 (quoting Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal. 4th 412, 449–450).)
• Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Third, CEQA and CEQA Guidelines are strict and unambiguous about when a Negative Declaration (“ND”) or a Mitigated Negative Declaration (“MND”) may be used. A public agency must prepare an EIR whenever substantial evidence supports a “fair argument” that a proposed project “may have a significant effect on the environment.” (Pub. Res. Code §§ 21100, 21151; Guidelines §§ 15002(f)(1) & (2), 15063; No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (“No Oil”) (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 75; Communities for a Better Environment v. California Resources Agency (2002) 103 Cal.App.4th 98, 111-112.) “Said another way, if a lead agency is presented with a fair argument that a project may” – [not “will”] – “have a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency shall prepare an EIR even though it may also be presented with other substantial evidence that the project will not have a significant effect.” (Guidelines §§ 15064(f)(1) & (2) (emph. added); No Oil, supra, 13 Cal.3d 68, 75.)
“Substantial evidence” means “enough relevant information and reasonable inferences from this information that a fair argument can be made to support a conclusion, even though other conclusions might also be reached.” (Guidelines § 15384(a).) “Substantial evidence is not argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion or narrative, evidence that is clearly inaccurate or erroneous….” (Pub. Res. Code § 21080(e)(2); see also Guidelines § 15384(a).)
The fair argument standard is a “low threshold” test for requiring the preparation of an EIR. (No Oil, supra, 13 Cal.3d at 84; County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 of Los Angeles County v.

County of Kern (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1544, 1579 (“County Sanitation”).) It “requires the preparation of an EIR where ‘there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the 10-61
project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause a significant effect on the environment, regardless of whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or beneficial . . . .’” (County Sanitation, supra, 127 Cal.App.4th at 1580, quoting Guidelines § 15063(b)(1).) A lead agency may adopt an MND only if “there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment[].” (Guidelines § 15074(b) (emphasis added).)
Evidence supporting a fair argument of a significant environmental impact triggers preparation of an EIR regardless of whether the record contains contrary evidence. (League for Protection of Oakland’s Architectural and Historical Resources v. City of Oakland (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 896, 904-905.) “Where the question is the sufficiency of the evidence to support a fair argument, ‘deference to the agency’s determination is not appropriate . . . .’” (County Sanitation, 127 Cal.App.4th at 1579, (emphasis added), quoting Sierra Club v. County of Sonoma (1992) 6 Cal.App.4th 1307, 1317-1318.) Further, it is the duty of the lead agency, not the public, to conduct the proper environmental studies. “The agency should not be allowed to hide behind its own failure to gather relevant data.” (Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 311.) “Deficiencies in the record may actually enlarge the scope of fair argument by lending a logical plausibility to a wider range of inferences.” (Id.) The “lack of study . . . ‘enlarge[s] the scope’ of the fair argument which may be made ‘based on the limited facts in the record’ [Cit. omit.]” (Gentry v. City of Murrieta (1995) 36 Cal.App.4th 1359, 1382.)
Thus, refusal to complete recommended studies lowers the already low threshold to establish a fair argument. The “court may not exercise its independent judgment on the omitted material by determining whether the ultimate decision of the lead agency would have been affected had the law been followed. . . . The remedy for this deficiency was for the trial court to have issued a writ of mandate . . . .” (Environmental Protection Information Center v. California Dept. of Forestry (2008) 44 Cal.4th 459, 486.) Both the review for failure to follow CEQA’s procedures and the fair argument test are questions of law, i.e., de novo standard of review applies. (Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 Cal.4th 412, 435.) “Whether the agency’s record contains substantial evidence that would support a fair argument that the project may have a significant effect on the environment is treated as a question of law. (See, e.g., Consolidated Irrig. Dist. v. City of Selma (2012) 204 Cal.App.4th 187, 207.” (Kostka and Zischke, Practice Under the Environmental Quality Act, (2017, 2d ed.), at 10-62
§ 6.76 (emphasis added).) The Court gives no deference to the agency in the MND context.

In an MND context, the agency or the court should not weigh expert testimony or decide on the credibility of evidence; such weighing is for an EIR. As stated in Pocket Protectors v. City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903, 935:

Unlike the situation where an EIR has been prepared, neither the lead agency nor a court may “weigh” conflicting substantial evidence to determine whether an EIR must be prepared in the first instance.

Guidelines section 15064, subdivision (f)(1) provides in pertinent part: “if a lead agency is presented with a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency shall prepare an EIR even though it may also be presented with other substantial evidence that the project will not have a significant effect. (No Oil [, supra,] 13 Cal.3d 68 [118 Cal.Rptr. 34, 529 P.2d 66]).” Thus, as Claremont itself recognized, “Consideration is not to be given contrary evidence supporting the preparation of a negative declaration. ( City of Carmel -by-the Sea v. Board of Supervisors (1986) 183 Cal.App.3d 229, 244–245 [227 Cal.Rptr. 899]; Friends of “B” Street v. City of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 988 [165 Cal.Rptr. 514].” (Claremont, supra, 37 Cal.App.4th at p. 1168, 44 Cal.Rptr.2d 288. (Pocket Protectors, 124 Cal.App.4th at 935.)
In cases where it is not clear whether there is substantial evidence of significant environmental impacts, CEQA requires erring on the side of a “preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review.” (Mejia v. City of Los Angeles (2005) 130 Cal.App.4th 322, 332.) “The foremost principle under CEQA is that the Legislature intended the act to be interpreted in such manner as to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language.” (Friends of Mammoth v. Board of Supervisors (1972) 8 Cal.3d 247, 259.) • CEQA Exemptions and Exceptions Thereto.

Fourth, where the Lead Agency chooses to dispose of CEQA by asserting a CEQA exemption, it has a duty to support its CEQA exemption findings by substantial evidence, including evidence that there are no applicable exceptions to exemptions.

This duty is imposed by CEQA and related case law. (Guidelines § 15020 [“The Lead Agency shall not knowingly release a deficient document hoping that public comments 10-63
will correct defects in the document.”]; see also, Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v.

State ex rel. 14th Dist. Ag. Assn. (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 555, 568 [“The lead agency has the burden to demonstrate that a project falls within a categorical exemption and the agency’s determination must be supported by substantial evidence”]; Association for Protection etc. Values v. City of Ukiah (1991) 2 Cal.App.4th 720, 732 [agency is required to consider exemption exceptions “where there is some information or evidence in the record that the project might have a significant impact.”] The duty to support CEQA (and/or exemption) findings with substantial evidence is also required by the Code of Civil Procedure and case law on administrative or traditional writs. Under Code of Civil Procedure (“CCP”) § 1094.5(b), an abuse of discretion is established if the decision is not supported by the findings, or the findings are not supported by the evidence. CCP § 1094.5(b). In Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Community v. County of Los Angeles (1974) 11 Cal.3d 506, 515 (“Topanga”), our Supreme Court held that “implicit in [Code of Civil Procedure] section 1094.5 is a requirement that the agency which renders the challenged decision must set forth findings to bridge the analytic gap between the raw evidence and ultimate decision or order.” The agency’s findings may “be determined to be sufficient if a court ‘has no trouble under the circumstances discerning the analytic route the administrative agency traveled from evidence to action.’” West Chandler Blvd. Neighborhood Ass’n vs. City of Los Angeles (2011) 198 Cal.App.4th 1506, 1521- 1522. However, “mere conclusory findings without reference to the record are inadequate.” Id. at 1521 (finding city council findings conclusory, violating Topanga).

Further, CEQA exemptions must be narrowly construed to accomplish CEQA’s environmental objectives. California Farm Bureau Federation v. California Wildlife Conservation Bd. (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 173, 187 (“California Farm”); Save Our Carmel River v. Monterey Peninsula Water Management Dist. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 677, 697 (“These rules ensure that in all but the clearest cases of categorical exemptions, a project will be subject to some level of environmental review.”) Finally, CEQA procedures reflect a preference for resolving doubts in favor of environmental review. (See, Pub. Res. Code § 21080(c) [dispose of EIR only if “there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the lead agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment” or “revisions in the project …. Would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effect on the environment would occur, and ….” Emph. added.]; Guidelines 10-64
§§ 15061(b)(3) [common sense exemption only “where it can be seen with certainty ….”]; 15063(b)(1) [prepare an EIR “if he agency determines that there is substantial evidence that any aspect of the project, either individually or cumulatively, may cause a significant effect on the environment, regardless of whether the overall effect of the project is adverse or beneficial”]; 15064(h) [need to consider cumulative impacts of past, other current and “probable future” projects]; 15070 [prepare a negative declaration only if “no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the agency, that the project may have a significant effect on the environment,” or project “revisions would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur, and (2) there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the project, that the project as revised may have a significant effect on the environment” emph. added]; No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 83-84 [interpret “significant impacts” so as “to afford the fullest possible protection”].) B. Due to the COVID-19 Crisis, the Lead Agency Must Adopt a Mandatory Finding of Significance that the Project May Cause a Substantial Adverse Effect on Human Beings and Mitigate COVID-19 Impacts
CEQA requires that an agency make a finding of significance when a Project may cause a significant adverse effect on human beings. (PRC § 21083(b)(3); CEQA Guidelines § 15065(a)(4).)
Public health risks related to construction work require a mandatory finding of significance under CEQA. Construction work has been defined as a Lower to High- risk activity for COVID-19 spread by the Occupations Safety and Health Administration. Recently, several construction sites have been identified as sources of community spread of COVID-19.
8 Southwest Carpenters recommend that the Lead Agency adopt additional CEQA mitigation measures to mitigate public health risks from the Project’s construction activities. Southwest Carpenters request that the Lead Agency require safe on-site construction work practices as well as training and certification for any construction workers on the Project Site.
8 Santa Clara County Public Health (June 12, 2020) COVID-19 CASES AT

CONSTRUCTION SITES HIGHLIGHT NEED FOR CONTINUED VIGILANCE IN SECTORS THAT HAVE REOPENED, available at https://www.sccgov.org/sites/ covid19/Pages/press-release-06-12-2020-cases-at-construction-sites.aspx. 10-65
In particular, based upon Southwest Carpenters’ experience with safe construction site work practices, Southwest Carpenters recommend that the Lead Agency require that while construction activities are being conducted at the Project Site:

Construction Site Design:
• The Project Site will be limited to two controlled entry points. • Entry points will have temperature screening technicians taking temperature readings when the entry point is open. • The Temperature Screening Site Plan shows details
regarding access to the Project Site and Project Site logistics for conducting temperature screening.
• A 48-hour advance notice will be provided to all trades prior to the first day of temperature screening.
• The perimeter fence directly adjacent to the entry points will be clearly marked indicating the appropriate 6 -foot social distancing position for when you approach the screening area. Please reference the Apex temperature screening site map for additional details.
• There will be clear signage posted at the project site directing you through temperature screening.
• Provide hand washing stations throughout the construction site.

Testing Procedures:
• The temperature screening being used are non -contact devices.
• Temperature readings will not be recorded.
• Personnel will be screened upon entering the testing center and should only take 1-2 seconds per individual.
• Hard hats, head coverings, sweat, dirt, sunscreen or any other cosmetics must be removed on the forehead before
temperature screening.
10-66
• Anyone who refuses to submit to a temperature screening or does not answer the health screening questions will be
refused access to the Project Site.
• Screening will be performed at both entrances from 5:30 am to 7:30 am.; main gate [ZONE 1] and personnel gate
[ZONE 2]
• After 7:30 am only the main gate entrance [ZONE 1] will continue to be used for temperature testing for anybody gaining entry to the project site such as returning personnel, deliveries, and visitors.
• If the digital thermometer displays a temperature reading above 100.0 degrees Fahrenheit, a second reading will be taken to verify an accurate reading.
• If the second reading confirms an elevated temperature, DHS will instruct the individual that he/she will not be allowed to enter the Project Site. DHS will also instruct the individual to promptly notify his/her supervisor and his/her human resources (HR) representative and provide them with a copy of Annex A.

Planning
• Require the development of an Infectious Disease
Preparedness and Response Plan that will include basic
infection prevention measures (requiring the use of personal protection equipment), policies and procedures for prompt identification and isolation of sick individuals, social distancing (prohibiting gatherings of no more than 10
people including all -hands meetings and all-hands lunches) communication and training and workplace controls that
meet standards that may be promulgated by the Center for Disease Control, Occupational Safety and Health
10-67
Administration, Cal/OSHA, California Department of
Public Health or applicable local public health agencies.9 The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Carpenters International Training Fund has developed COVID-19 Training and Certification to ensure that Carpenter union members and apprentices conduct safe work practices. The Lead Agency should require that all construction workers undergo COVID-19 Training and Certification before being allowed to conduct construction activities at the Project Site.

Southwest Carpenters has also developed a rigorous Infection Control Risk Assessment (“ICRA”) training program to ensure it delivers a workforce that understands how to identify and control infection risks by implementing protocols to protect themselves and all others during renovation and construction projects in healthcare environments.
10 ICRA protocols are intended to contain pathogens, control airflow, and protect patients during the construction, maintenance and renovation of healthcare facilities.

ICRA protocols prevent cross contamination, minimizing the risk of secondary infections in patients at hospital facilities.

The City should require the Project to be built using a workforce trained in ICRA protocols.

II. THE CITY VIOLATED THE BROWN ACT AND DUE PROCESS

THROUGH ITS PREJUDICIALLY DEFECTIVE PUBLIC
HEARING NOTICE AND AGENDA; CEASE AND DESIST
DEMAND & CURE AND CORRECT REQUEST.

The Brown Act Cal. Govt. Code section 54954.2(a)(1) requires that an agenda containing a brief description of each item of business be posted at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. Govt. Code section 54954.2(a)(3), in turn, provides:
9 See also, The Center for Construction Research and Training, North America’s Building Trades Unions (April 27 2020) NABTU and CPWR COVIC-19 Standards for U.S Constructions Sites, available at https://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/NABTU_ CPWR_Standards_COVID-19.pdf; Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (2020) Guidelines for Construction Sites During COVID-19 Pandemic, available at https://dpw.lacounty.gov/building-and-safety/docs/pw_guidelines-construction-sites.pdf. 10 For details concerning Southwest Carpenters’ ICRA training program, see https://icrahealthcare.com/.
10-68
(3) No action or discussion shall be undertaken on any item not appearing on the posted agenda, except that members of a legislative body or its staff may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed by persons exercising their public testimony rights under Section 54954.3. In addition, on their own initiative or in response to questions posed by the public, a member of a legislative body or its staff may ask a question for clarification, make a brief announcement, or make a brief report on his or her own activities. Furthermore, a member of a legislative body, or the body itself, subject to rules or procedures of the legislative body, may provide a reference to staff or other resources for factu al information, request staff to report back to the body at a subsequent meeting concerning any matter, or take action to direct staff to place a matter of business on a future agenda.
(Govt. Code § 54954.2(a)(3), emph. added.)
As the Office of the Attorney General explained in 2003:

The Act makes it clear that discussion items must be placed on the agenda, as well as items which may be the subject of action by the body. The purpose of the brief general description is to inform interested members of the public about the subject matter under consideration so that they can determine whether to monitor or participate in the meeting of the body. 11 (The Brown Act, Open Meetings For Local Legislative Bodies, Office of the Attorney General, 2003, at pp. 16-17.)
In Carlson v. Paradise Unified School Dist. (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 196, the court interpreted the agenda requirements in the Education Code and the Brown Act’s analogous principles:

There has been a long and vigorous battle found against secrecy in government. (See, e.g., Gov.Code, ss 54950 et seq.; Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92, of America Newspaper Guild v. Sacramento County Bd. of Supervisors (1968) 263 Cal.App.2d 41, 49—50, 69 Cal.Rptr. 480; see also 37 11 The Brown Act, Open Meetings For Local Legislative Bodies, Office of the Attorney General, 2003, at pp. 16-17; See at https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/media/the-brown- act.pdf
10-69
Cal. State Bar J. 540.) It is now the rule that local governing bodies, elected by the people, exist to aid in the conduct of the people's business, and thus their deliberations should be conducted openly and with due notice with a few exceptions not applicable here. (See Gov.Code, ss 54950 et seq.; cf. 3 Witkin, Summary of Cal. Law, Constitutional Law, s 116, p. 1919; 70 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 113.) The process of the education of our children is properly a matter of public concern. (See Brown v. Board of Ed. of Topeka (1955), 349 U.S. 294, 75 S.Ct. 753, 99 L.Ed. 1083; see also Robinson v.

Sacramento City United School Dist. (1966) 245 Cal.App.2d 278, 53 Cal.Rptr. 781.)
(Carlson v. Paradise Unified Sch. Dist. (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 196, 199.) Drawing parallels between the Brown Act and the Education Code, the trial court emphasized that “. . . [a] list of items that will constitute the agenda for all regular meetings shall be posted. . . .” (Carlson v. Paradise Unified School Dist. (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 196, 199.) In interpreting this section, the court reasoned:

In the instant case, the school board’s agenda contained as one item the language ‘Continuation school site change.’ This was entirely inadequate notice to a citizenry which may have been concerned over a school closure.

On this point alone, we think the trial court was correct because the agenda item, though not deceitful, was entirely misleading and inadequate to show the whole scope of the board’s intended plans. It would have taken relatively little effort to add to the agenda that this ‘school site change’ also included the discontinuance of elementary education at Canyon View and the transfer of those students to Ponderosa School. (Carlson v. Paradise Unified School Dist. (1971) 18 Cal.App.3d 196, 200, see also 67 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 84, 87 (1984).)
12 12 See also, Moreno v. City of King (2005) 127 Cal App 4th 17, 26-27 (the brief description of an item that the Council will consider or deliberate, cannot be ambiguous or misstate the item under discussion and an item on the agenda describing consideration of contract for Interim Finance Director was not sufficient notice of actually considering the termination of the sitting Finance Director; “The agenda’s description [Public Employee (employment contract)] provided no clue that the dismissal of a public employee would be discussed at the meeting. The City argues that further specification would have violated Moreno's privacy rights. Not so.”).
10-70
As described by the Office of the Attorney General in 2003, the Planning Commission’s July 14, 2022 agenda (“Agenda”) here failed the purpose of the Brown Act’s “brief general description” under Govt. Code § 54954.2(a) “to inform interested members of the public about the subject matter under consideration so that they can determine whether to monitor or participate in the meeting of the body.” Also, as described by Carlson v. Paradise Unified School Dist., the July 14, 2022 agenda provided “inadequate notice” to the citizenry and was “entirely misleading and inadequate to show the whole scope” of the Project and the Planning Commission’s actions thereon.

First, based on the Public Hearing Notice for July 14, 2022 (“Notice”), the “Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan). The Section 31 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2018081074) was certified in December 2019.” (Emph. added.) The Notice does not mention that a CEQA exemption determination or action that is be taken by the Planning Commission – i.e., determination as to whether the Project is exempt from CEQA. Moreover, despite the Notice’s blanket conclusion that the Project “is exempt” from CEQA, such determination is ultimately up to the discretion of the Project’s lead agency, i.e., the City Council. (See, CEQA Guidelines, 15601(e) [“[w]hen a non-elected official or decision making body of a local agency decides that a project is exempt from CEQA, and the public agency approves or determines to carry out the project, the decision that the project is exempt may be appealed to the local lead agency’s elected decision making body”.) Therefore, the consideration of the CEQA exemption determination is an item of business to be acted upon at the Meeting and must be specifically disclosed on the Agenda. Yet, the Agenda did not provide the public with adequate notice as to the CEQA action or determination that was to take place on July 14, 2022.

As shown below, the Agenda provided no adequate description of the actions to be taken as to CEQA, and limited the hearing actions to only consideration of the tentative tract map:
10-71

(July 14, 2022 Planning Commission Agenda.)
As expressly stated in the Agenda’s description, the action to be taken was not the determination of CEQA exemption, but only the “consideration to subdivide…” While the heading mentions about a “CEQA action” or about filing of a notice, it does not specify that it is about a CEQA exemption notice and in general does not communicate that an exemption determination, findings, or discussion must still be made.

Yet, as evidenced by the July 14, 2022 Staff Report (“Staff Report”) – distinct from the Agenda itself and not incorporated into the agenda by any means – there were two distinct actions taken or recommendations made at the July 14, 2022 public hearing:

Thus, the omission of the CEQA exemption determination or recommendation was improperly omitted from the Agenda and yet such a distinct action was taken during the July 14, 2022 meeting, in violation of the Brown Act Govt. Code § 54954.2(a)(1) & (3).
10-72
Second, since at least February of 2022, the Project to be approved and for which the CEQA exemption is sought is generally and publicly known as Disney’s Cotino13 project; yet, there is no such identifier in the Public Hearing Notice and most importantly the Agenda. Instead, the Notice and the Agenda provided a highly technical description of the case numbers, calling those the “Project” and further describing it as merely “70.44 acres” within the Specific Plan. In fact, as written, the Agenda’s “Public Hearing” Item 1 (on the Disney’s Cotino project here) is barely distinguished from Item 2 (unrelated to this case), as shown below:

As such, the Notice and the Agenda failed to communicate to the public what is the Project for which the approval is sought (i.e., Disney’s Cotino) and who is the actual proponent of it (Disney). Neither did the description suggest that the 187 single- family residential lots are part of Disney’s Storyliving or the “recreation” and the CVWD “well site” include the controversial 24-acre Lagoon that will bear Disney’s brand as well and therefore reasonably foreseeable attract more tourism and activity. 13 See, e.g., Desert Sun Article re “Disney's coming to town. Is that always good news?” (February 25, 2022) at:
https://www.desertsun.com/story/opinion/editorials/2022/02/25/disneys-cotino-rancho- mirage-may-good-news-but-keep-eyes-open/6931916001/ ; see also, USA Today Article re “New master-planned communities will let Disney fans 'be part of Disney all of the time’” (February 16, 2022) at: https://www.usatoday.com/story/travel/experience/theme- parks/2022/02/16/disney-getting-into-residential-housing-market- storyliving/6811164001/; article re Cotino – Storyliving by Disney at https://www.storylivingbydisney.com/cotino.html
10-73
Tellingly, the Staff Report (at pp. 31-34 [exhibits]) includes the identifier of “Section 31/Cotino” along a few exhibit pages and the following descriptor notation:

As such, the Project is indisputably known to be “Section 31/Cotino” rather than the vague identifier in the Notice and Agenda of “70.44 acres” within the Section 31 Specific Plan. Yet, the Notice and Agenda omitted this “Cotino” or Disney identifier.

Interestingly, even the July 14, 2022 PC Staff Report does not mention or identify that the Project’s theme and brand is by Disney and its de facto applicant or proponent – apart from the land owner or formal applicant - is Disney. This definitely enlarges the scope of the Project and the Specific Plan, suggesting more and unique attractions, more intense uses and activity, and more visitors to the Project site. As described in the Desert Sun’s article:

When Disney sets out to do something, it usually gets done.

And the Mouse is coming to the Coachella Valley, slapping its ears and name on a project in Rancho Mirage planned to have 1,700 homes, 400 hotel rooms and shopping.

That brings pote ntial. But residents and elected officials shouldn’t be blinded by the “magic” Disney reputation. There are still reasons to be wary, as with any huge development.

The vision for 618 acres of long -vacant prime land has been clear since 2019, when the city council approved Arizona-based DMB
Development’s plan for the site.

So when Disney announced its involvement with a media blitz that included “Good Morning America,” there wasn’t a whole lot of substance.

DMB is still involved, and the branding and render ings and the new “Cotino” name were mostly razzle -dazzle. Rancho Mirage officials had just learned about Disney’s involvement but were already jazzed. Mayor Ted Weill said the company’s “Storyliving” plan would be a good fit for what he called the largest project in city history.
10-74
Disney has an often deserved reputation for quality (if not affordability) at its amusement parks, hotels and more.

And it helps boost excitement when people hear the valley will be home to a first-of-its-kind project.

Cotino is being marketed as the debut “Storyliving by Disney” community, something described vaguely as “expanding storytelling to storyliving” and a place “infused with the company’s special brand of magic.” (Desert Sun Article Disney's coming to town. Is that always good news? February 25, 2022.)14 As described above and reasonably foreseeable, Disney’s branding and involvement in the Project significantly enlarges its scope and impacts and raise relevant issues that the public may be interested to know and be able to comment upon.

Third and lastly, the noted omissions in the Notice and Agenda (and Staff Report) are prejudicial for many reasons. First, the omission in the agenda of a specific action to be taken on the CEQA exemption and determination is a Brown Act violation in that it failed to provide readers notice as to the CEQA determination the Planning Commission will make and thereby precluded public comment and participation on that determination. Second, the lack of Disney’s Cotino identifier for the Project or its Proponent precluded the public of the critical information on the Project that bears on both the scope of the project and consideration of subdivisions, as well as the Project’s environmental impacts that the public could have commented on. Disney’s involvement or branding will reasonably and arguably attract more tourism and have more intensive uses, as compared with just another standard development of “187 single-family residential lots” and recreation spaces by any regular developer, as the Agenda or Notice suggest. Such more intensive uses are, in turn, directly proportional and linked to potential significant impacts of the Project under CEQA (e.g., air quality, traffic, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, etc.) and bearing on whether the Project is indeed CEQA exempt.

Third, and for the reasons stated, such disclosure failures in the Public Hearing Notice and Agenda deprived the public of the fair and due process of being fairly apprised of their property rights and interests before being deprived thereof. 14 See, https://www.desertsun.com/story/opinion/editorials/2022/02/25/disneys-cotino- rancho-mirage-may-good-news-but-keep-eyes-open/6931916001/ 10-75
In sum, SWRCC respectfully demand in accordance with the Brown Act Govt. Code Sections 54960 and 54960.1 that the City cease and desist from the pattern and practice of issuing vague agenda and public hearing notices and cure and correct the above-noted violations of the Brown Act by: (1) continuing and re-noticing a new date for the Planning Commission hearing on Disney’s Cotino project; (2) properly identifying Disney’s Cotino project and all actions to be taken by the Planning Commission, including CEQA exemption determination and findings; and (3) invalidating the Planning Commission’s resolutions and recommendations on July 14, 2022 that were in violation of the Brown Act. (See, San Joaquin Raptor Rescue Center v.

County of Merced (2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 1167, 1178-1179 [“Even assuming for the sake of argument that a person could have speculated from what appeared on the agenda (i.e., the project’s approval) that the adoption of the [CEQA determination] might possibly be considered at the meeting, that would not make the agenda legally adequate”].) Otherwise, as stated by the court, “[I]t seems more likely to us that the net effect of the approach taken by the Commission would be to mislead (not inform) the public about what items of business would be addressed at the meeting, due to the material omission…” (Id., emph. orig.)
III. THE PROJECT IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR A CEQA EXEMPTION,
AS A MATTER OF LAW.

Based on the Notice, the “Project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan). The Section 31 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2018081074) was certified in December 2019.” (Emph. added.) The Staff Report mentions about the reasoning in CEQA exemption briefly (at pp. 1-2, 1-8—1-9, 1-24 and 1-28), and provides no factual support for the exemption beyond the fact that the Specific Plan discussed residential development and the Project’s residential development does not exceed the number of units envisaged under Specific Plan.

Thus, for example, the Staff Report provides:

The proposed project has been reviewed in compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Section 31 Specific Plan entitlement package was reviewed in compliance with CEQA, and the Section 31 Specific Plan EIR (SCH No. 2018081074) was certified on December 5, 2019. This Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan), specifically 10-76
subdivision (c) Residential Projects Implementing Specific Plans. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is within the scope of the project covered by the certified EIR for the Section 31 Specific Plan and is not proposing to exceed the maximum of 1,932 dwelling units permitted by the Section 31 Specific Plan and evaluated by the Specific Plan EIR. The Section 31 Specific Plan density range for the Project Site is 20 to 60 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). The Project is proposing a density range of 4 to 39 du/ac, and therefore is not proposing to intensify the general density structure. The effects of the implementation of the Section 31 Specific Plan were examined in the EIR and all feasible mitigation measures and alternatives developed and identified in the Final EIR have been incorporated into the Conditions of Approval for this Project.
(Staff Report, p. 1-24, ital. orig.)
Importantly, nowhere does the Staff Report analyze the limitation (and requirements for a subsequent EIR per CEQA Guidelines § 15162) to the application of the invoked Specific Plan exemption under CEQA Guidelines § 15182(c)(2), which provides:
(2) Limitation. If after the adoption of the specific plan, an event described in Section 15162 occurs, the exemption in this subdivision shall not apply until the city or county which adopted the specific plan completes a subsequent EIR or a supplement to an EIR on the specific plan. The exemption provided by this section shall again be available to residential projects after the Lead Agency has filed a Notice of Determination on the specific plan as reconsidered by the subsequent EIR or supplement to the EIR.
(CEQA Guidelines § 15182(c)(2), emph. added.)
As relevant here, to qualify for a CEQA exemption under Guidelines § 15162, the City must consider and find, as follows:
(a) When an EIR has been certified or a negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless the lead agency determines, on the basis of substantial evidence in the light of the whole record, one or more of the following:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the 10-77
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvem ent of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted, shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; or
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.” (Guidelines § 15162. (Emph. added).)
Moreover, substantial evidence is not argument or speculation, but facts and reasonable inferences based on facts or an expert opinion based on facts. (Guidelines § 15384.)
Here, the City’s CEQA determination or Staff Report does not even reference CEQA Guidelines § 15162, does not provide any analysis of the above-noted conditions and limitations, including whether the Project has not increased in scope, whether the circumstances under which the Project is now proposed have not changed, and whether there is no new information that may indicate more severe impacts and yet 10-78
were not known and could not have been known when the Specific Plan 31’s EIR’s was certified in 2019. Neither are there any findings made on these issues.

Yet, there is substantial evidence that the limitations listed in Guidelines § 15162 apply here since:
1) Substantial changes occurred in the Specific Plan itself that may have additional or more severe impacts than studied in the 2019 EIR; 2) Substantial changes occurred within the circumstances of the Specific Plan which raises new significant information and new or more severe impacts that were not considered or addressed in the prior 2019 EIR;
3) New information that was not known and could not be known is now available, showing that project will have one or more impact that was will be more severe than before; and
4) New information that was not known and could not have been known is now available showing that there may be additional mitigation measures to reduce impacts.

In addition, the exemption does not apply in light of mandatory findings of significance due to cumulative impacts and direct/indirect impacts on human beings under CEQA Guidelines § 15065.

A. Specific Plan – 2019 EIR’s Project Description and Environmental Setting.

The Specific Plan’s Environmental Impact Report (“EIR”) did not study the intensity of the Plan or severity of its impacts, in view of Disney’s involvement or branding.

Thus, for example, the EIR does not mention about Disney or Cotino, but simply provides in general terms15:

1. Land Use
The Section 31 Specific Plan would allow the development of a mixed-use community including residential, mixed-use core, and lagoon land uses, as shown in Figure 3.0- 3: Conceptual Land Use Plan. The proposed master-planned community includes resort hotels, a mixed -use town 15 See, https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/72272-2/attachment/nnqNvXM7Y-dh2vUa- 38Nt1o01Xe0g7bCK6ov6vHkomKpAwurF3jwLMscUMhz_nQf9PmJfIgH6xrEy5LI0 10-79
center, residential neighborhoods, a private street system, and recreational open space amenities including a swimmable lagoon, an integrated system of pedestrian, bicycle, and golf cart trail linkages, neighborhood parks, water features, a residents’ Beach Club, and complementary features. (EIR, p. 3.0-2.)
Similarly, the EIR’s project description provides that the lagoon will be accessible to non- residents:

Grand Oasis Promenade: Would be publicly accessible for pedestrians and bicycles and would provide non-residents with an opportunity to visually enjoy the Grand Oasis lagoon. The Promenade would be positioned near the Grand Oasis lagoon, separated by a landscape barrier to manage and control access to the water itself. The Promenade would serve as a public open space amenity.

Lagoon Multi- Use Corridor: Would accommodate a full range of transportation options, including bike lanes, pedestrian walkways, and vehicular lanes. It would provide a continuous access loop behind the higher-density residential development that fronts the Grand Oasis lagoon. It would provide future residents of the Project Site with a convenient access route to the Town Center entertainment and shopping areas as well as accessible private beach areas and the residents’ Beach Club.
(EIR, p. 3.0-11.)
The EIR further confirms this public enjoyment of the Lagoon: “An additional tract of approximately 8 acres generally encircling the Grand Oasis lagoon will accommodate a multi-use public trail and a landscaped perimeter.” (EIR, p. 3.0-7, emph. added.) Further, while the EIR identifies the implementation of the Specific Plan 31 in four phases, none of those describes Disney Cotino’s 70.44 acres identified in the Notice and Agenda. (See EIR, p. 3.0-7—3.0-8 [Town Center Planning Area (PA TC) of 80 acres, Planning Area 1 (PA 1) of 34-acre lagoon and 198-acre residential and open space]; Planning Area 2 (PA-2) of 146 acre residential and open space; and Planning Area 3 (PA 3) of 161 acre residential and open space.) As such, the Project here represents just a section in the PA 1 phase, leaving out the remaining sections unknown and their cumulative impacts unknown as well. To the extent this 10-80
segmenting of the Project or its phases into more parts may hide or conceal certain impacts by providing an incremental increase or piecemeal disclosures, the Project here violates CEQA’s piecemealing prohibition and alternatively fails to communicate the cumulative impact of all other parts of the Specific Plan.

Finally, the EIR’s project objectives, in relevant parts, include:

To design a high-quality, master-planned community featuring residential, hotel, mixed-use, and commercial development oriented around a Grand Oasis Crystal Lagoon (Grand Oasis lagoon) offering substantial new public recreational opportunities to extend the tourism season in Rancho Mirage…
(EIR, p. 3.01, emph. added.)
The EIR’s Project Objectives were manifestly vague and open-ended but in no event indicated that the “new public recreational opportunities to extend [the existing] tourism season in Rancho Mirage” could mean to bring Disney into the town and to create new tourism opportunities that could be year-long, rather than just seasonal. This is further significant since the Lagoon will be in the center of the Specific Plan and therefore easily accessible and equally attractive from all parts of the Specific Plan.

Second, the Specific Plan EIR’s environmental setting or baseline suggests that the EIR failed to consider issues that are critical now. In particular, the EIR’s environmental setting does not include the related projects after 2019, including but not limited to the Highway 111 Specific Plan. (EIR, pp. 4.0-25—27.)
16 Stated differently, the Project
proposed now, albeit based on the Specific Plan EIR approved in 2019, cannot tier from the 2019 EIR since the latter failed to study the cumulative impacts and changed conditions that occurred after 2019.

Third, the Staff Report’s account of the Project’s background confirms that the Specific Plan was not informed about or shaped by Disney’s involvement and that the Specific Plan EIR’s baseline assumptions were that the Specific Plan was just another regular development. Thus, the Specific Plan and its EIR were drafted just after the failed attempt to develop the land into a golf club by another applicant – Annenberg Estate and/or its investors – under the Eagle Specific Plan in 1977-1993, and also after the 16 https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/72272-
2/attachment/0hwbwk3dnBRmoSa0rXJh94GUPzVEqzN9h5pxcTTeH3mK3EiLD4X9SP 4gttexKyxhEKG7Ni5mCSbpnTuz0
10-81
current land-owner’s purchase of the land in December of 2017 and application to develop the Section 31 Specific Plan submitted in early 2018. Regardless of whether Disney was in the picture at the time of the official applicant’s submitting of the Specific Plan applications in 2018 or developing/certifying the 2019 Specific Plan’s EIR, no such information or disclosure was found or provided in the EIR.

Based on the information in mass media, even the City officials – who previously certified the Specific Plan’s EIR and approved the Specific Plan in 2019 – did not know about Disney’s branding, theme, or involvement and found out about it only in early 2022, i.e., three years later.

Moreover, based on various statements published in 2022, including by Disney’s executives, show that the 70.44-acre Project here is only part of Disney’s Storyliving Project which includes the development of 600 acres by Disney.17 As reported by abc7:

More than 600 acres of open land in the Coachella Valley are about to be transformed into Cotino, the first Storyliving by Disney community in the U.S.
“The story is really about the residents of the community,” said Thomas Mazloum, president of Disney Signature Experiences. “ This is what makes this so very, very different. Because it isn’t just about our program - which will be spectacular - but it is really where our residents and the community can write and live their own story.”
(Abc7 Article Disney breaks ground on Cotino in Rancho Mirage, first Storyliving housing community in US, April 27, 2022.)
Thus, the Specific Plan’s EIR provided no information about Disney’s involvement or theme in the Project and therefore prejudicially precluded meaningful information about the scope and impacts of the Project, including due to attracting year-long tourism and visitors from nearby cities and the world to Disney-branded recreation places, parks, and the centrally-located Lagoon Oasis.

B. The Project Violates CEQA In Its Piecemeal Approvals, Which Further Makes CEQA Exemption Determination Impossible and Erroneous.

17 https://abc7.com/disney-cotino-rancho-mirage-storyliving/11797246/ 10-82
CEQA forbids piecemealing. (Lighthouse Field Beach Rescue v. City of Santa Cruz (2005) 131 Cal.App.4th 1170, 1208–1209 [“The requirements of CEQA cannot be avoided by piecemeal review which results from ‘chopping a large project into many little ones- each with a minimal potential impact on the environment-which cumulatively may have disastrous consequences.’ (Bozung v. Local Agency Formation Com. (1975) 13 Cal.3d 263, 283–284.”)].) CEQA’s piecemealing prohibition stems from various provisions and regulations, including that the agency must evaluate the “whole of an action” (CEQA Guidelines §15378(a);) and all its phases:

All phases of the project must be considered. (Guidelines, § 15126.) The EIR must describe the project’s direct and reasonably foreseeable indirect environmental effects and analyze them in both the short -term and the long-term. (Guidelines, §§ 15126.2, subd. (a); 15064, subd. (d).) It should emphasize the specific effects in proportion to their severity and their probability of occurrence. (Guidelines, § 15143.)
The EIR must also analyze the project’s cumulative impacts. A cumulative impact on the environment is an impact created as a result of the combination of the project's impacts with other projects causing related impacts. (Guidelines, § 15130, subd. (a)(1).) The EIR must analyze a project's cumulative impacts when the project's incremental effect is cumulatively considerable. (Guidelines, § 15130.)
(League to Save Lake Tahoe Mountain etc. v. County of Placer (2022) 75 Cal.App.5th 63, 91–

95.)
First, as discussed in Section A, supra, the Project as presented now involves only a subdivision of 70.44 acres into single-family residential lots and other recreational spaces, as distinct from their future vertical
18 development. As such, no specifics are provided
about the height or massing of the single-family homes, their design, or the specific site conditions, the private streets to be laid out, and other details that are important and 18 The Staff Report, at p. 1-4 describes the Project as merely a subdivision, does not provide any details about the design or development on the lots and provides: “PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project will subdivide four lots totaling 70.44 gross acres into 187 single-family detached residential lots, 4 remainder lots for future Residential or Town Center uses, as well as lots for open space, recreation, private streets, and a CVWD well site. No new vertical development is being proposed in conjunction with the proposed subdivision.” (Emph. added.)

10-83
can bear upon the lot subdivision. Yet, the approval conditions in the Staff Report suggest that no further discretionary approval and related CEQA review is expected for the development phase, beyond merely ministerial issuance of building permits.

Similarly, the Staff Report shows that another part of the Specific Plan was similarly approved in piecemeal fashion for the subdivision in 2021, while the applications for the vertical development have not yet been received for same as of the July 14, 2022.19 As such, the Project is one of many piecemealed approvals for subdivisions and critically its requested approval is narrowly, improperly, and misleadingly limited to the subdivision phase only, while clearly pre-committing to the development of those lots without any further and required details. This failure to outline the actual scope of the Project involving all phases of the action – subdivision, development, operation of the Cotino project, and of all of its parts, including the Project here - constitutes a violation of CEQA’s piecemealing prohibition and good-faith disclosure requirement.

This piecemealing is further prejudicial since, as discussed in Section A, the Project of

70.44-acre subdivision is only a fraction of Disney’s planned 600-acre Cotino and various parts of Disney’s Cotino are undergoing separate approvals, without considering the reasonably foreseeable increased and incremental intensity of uses.

As described in Laurel Heights, Disney’s involvement in the Project at issue for the

70.44 acres, as well as its master plan Cotino for the development of 600 acres of land “will likely change the scope or nature of the initial project or its environmental effects” studied in the Specific Plan. (Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 396.) Yet, City’s piecemeal review of the Project, all of its phases (beyond just subdivision), their magnitude and scope, and further City’s failure to provide good faith disclosures about the Project and proposed approvals prejudicially preclude the possibility to determine if the Specific Plan EIR indeed has studied and mitigated all impacts, to warrant a CEQA exemption. 19 Staff Report, at p. 1-3: “On November 4, 2021, the City Council approved the Final Map for Tract Map No. 37856, known as Phase 1A, for the subdivision of 201.89 gross acres into 329 residential lots and associated infrastructure located at the southeast corner of Bob Hope Drive and Gerald Ford Drive. The tract map for Phase 1A was subsequently recorded with Riverside County on December 15, 2021. The Public Works Department has various permits issued for rough grading plans and street improvements. No entitlement applications for vertical construction have been submitted as of the date of this report.” (Emph. added.)

10-84
In sum, the fact that the Project presented for approval – i.e., subdivision of the lots as separate from their development – is piecemealed and the fact that the Project is also manifestly piecemealed from all other related projects and segments is a violation of CEQA and makes the CEQA exemption determination impossible, erroneous and unsupported. (Los Angeles Dept. of Water & Power v. County of Inyo (2021) 67 Cal.App.5th 1018, 1025 [“In the unpublished portions of this opinion, we conclude County committed two other CEQA violations. First, it improperly described the project as constituting only the proposed condemnation proceedings and a mere change in ownership of the landfill sites. Second, the unduly narrow project description caused County to erroneously conclude the commonsense exemption applied. The CEQA violations justified the trial court's issuance of a writ of mandate vacating County's approval of condemnation proceedings for each of the three landfills.”]) C. Substantial Changes in the Circumstances of the Specific Plan and New Information about the Specific Plan’s Impacts and Available Mitigation Measures Disqualify the Project’s CEQA Exemption under Guidelines §§ 15182 & 15162(a)(2)-(3).

Several changes have occurred in the circumstances of the Specific Plan since the Plan’s approval and EIR certification in December of 2019 as compared from the circumstances and scope contemplated in its EIR.
20 These changes constitute new
information of impacts, require new mitigation measures, and thereby preclude a CEQA exemption, as detailed below.

First, COVID-19 pandemic – which shook the world in 2020 and prompted California’s stay-at-home orders in March of 202021 - raised new safety concerns and new impacts that have to be considered during various phases of the Project, and most importantly its construction (safety of workers). These impacts may include but are not limited to the requirements to limit the number of workers to work at a site in view of the required distancing and additional safety measures, and, as a result, 20 See, December 5, 2019 Notice of Determination for the Section 31 Specific Plan EIR at https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/72272-3/attachment/Pm90NEzrdm6Bis5tBVG- z26NBAXjoQaGso85pd1x86RHqFfWrp1iwY3dAkE6GNWYIuso9FScBJ1o7oG80 21 See, COVID-19 Executive Order https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp- content/uploads/2020/03/3.19.20-attested-EO-N-33-20-COVID-19-HEALTH- ORDER.pdf
10-85
extending the time of the Project’s construction phase and its impacts (e.g., traffic and its related noise, air quality, GHG, etc.)
Similarly, there are new projects that were proposed in the City that may have new cumulative impacts, as compared with those studied in the Specific Plan in 2019.

Thus, as we have noted in our May 31, 2022 Comment letter related to the City’s Highway 111 Specific Plan Draft EIR and as analyzed and documented by our traffic expert Smart Mobility on April 7, 2022:
….
2) The City of Rancho Mirage has a large deficit of workforce housing.

There are 10,800 more service jobs in the City today than there are service workers living in the City. This deficit will get worse as Disney’s Cotino project and other developments are constructed. Many Rancho Mirage workers commute more than 50 miles in each direction and some commute more than 100 miles.
3) More market rate housing in Rancho Mirage will greatly increase VMT.

Given the affluent older population, each addition market-rate household requires approximately one additional service worker, and the additional commute VMT from that service worker must be considered in calculating the VMT impacts of the housing.
4) Constructing workforce housing in Rancho Mirage would reduce regional VMT. A valid analysis of the VMT impacts of the Highway 111 Specific Plan must draw a sharp contrast between market-rate housing and workforce housing and evaluate the VMT impacts of each separately. 5) Without enforceable commitments for a large portion of the increased residential entitlement to be workforce housing the Highway 111 Specific Plan will cause an excessive increase in VMT.
(Exhibit D, p. 6 [May 31, 2022 SWRCC Comment re Highway 111 Specific Plan EIR, Exhibit 2 (4/7/2022 Smart Mobility Report].)
As shown by Smart Mobility in our 5/31/2022 Comment Letter, the City’s vehicle- miles-traveled (“VMT”) calculations in the Draft EIR were based on incorrect and negative residential development assumptions that increasing of residential construction of market-rate units will necessarily reduce traffic, greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions 10-86
and air quality impacts. Yet, Smart Mobility found that the information was incorrect as it ignores the demographics in the City (more aging population, which will require additional service workers and caregivers), as well as numerous hotels and jobs (requiring more service and hospitality workers), while at the same time providing no affordable housing in the City where those caregivers or service workers can afford to live, necessitating longer commute and VMTs. (Exhibit D, pp. 7-9.) As a result, Smart Mobility recommended a new mitigation measure of setting aside a part of the Highway 111 Specific Plan residential development for affordable housing, in order to decrease the VMTs. (Exhibit D, p. 10.) It is well-known that an increase in VMT or traffic impacts is directly associated with the increase of noise, air quality and GHG impacts. As such, adding affordable housing and decreasing VMTs would also help to decrease the air quality and GHG impacts that the EIRs of the Highway 111 Specific Plan and the Section 31 Specific Plan found as significant and unavoidable.

Our referenced comment in Exhibit D – which we fully incorporate herein by reference – related to Smart Mobility in the Highway 111 Specific Plan EIR are actual, relevant, and applicable to this Project and the Specific Plan EIR as well. Nowhere does the Project’s Staff Report here indicate what the prices of the Project’s proposed single-family homes will be and whether any of those will be affordable for hospitality workers, caregivers or other service personnel. In the meantime, the Project and the Specific Plan are considering expanding the recreation possibilities in the City, building more hotels, and thereby attracting more service personnel that cannot afford to live in the City.

As such, the Project might have new or more severe significant impacts in view of the changed circumstances or new information related to the Section 31 Specific Plan’s individual impacts in light of COVID-19 concerns and safety requirements and lack of affordable housing that would cause traffic and associated impacts, as well as cumulative impacts of the Project and its underlying Section 31 Specific Plan along with other similar Specific Plans or projects, and particularly, the new Highway 111 Specific Plan, which had its own environmental impacts in traffic and air quality and yet provides no affordable housing to mitigate those.

The noted information about COVID-19, miscalculated VMT in light of the City’s demographics and lack of affordable housing, and related projects with similarly miscalculated VMTs constitute both a change in the Project’s circumstances and new information as to the individual and cumulative impacts and new mitigation measures 10-87
that was not known at the time of Section 31 Specific Plan’s EIR as described under CEQA Guidelines § 15162(a)(2)-(3) and disqualify the invoked exemption under CEQA Guidelines § 15182 on those grounds.

D. Substantial Changes in the Specific Plan Itself Disqualify the Exemption under Guidelines §§ 15182 & 15162(a)(1).

As discussed above and further detailed below, at the time the Specific Plan application was filed in 2018 and its EIR was prepared and certified in 2019, there was no information about the fact that the proposed development involves or is backed by Disney and will therefore attract more intensive uses and more tourists to the new, thematically distinct and unique Disney-themed parks, recreation areas, hotels, and the 24-acre Lagoon Oasis.

This information became known in February-April of 2022 through online articles and statements made by executives and council members and constitutes a substantial change in the Specific Plan or its scope and intensity, suggesting more or severe impacts than those studied in the Specific Plan EIR.

Hence, Disney’s involvement in the Specific Plan (and this Project) as revealed in 2022 constitutes a change in the Specific Plan and its scope and suggests more impacts and required mitigation measures as compared with the ones studied in the 2019 Specific Plan EIR (as detailed below).

The noted change in the Project’s scope requires substantial revisions in the Specific Plan EIR in the sections of impacts and mitigation measures and disqualifies a CEQA exemption under Guidelines § 15162(a)(1).

E. New Information about Disney’s Involvement or Branding of the Project and the Larger Specific Plan Shows New Impacts and Requires New Mitigation Measures that Disqualify CEQA Exemption under Guidelines §§ 15182 & 15162(a)(3).

Disney’s involvement or branding of the Specific Plan that was disclosed in 2022 is new information, which affects both the impacts analysis in the 2019 Specific Plan EIR, as well as the EIR’s proposed mitigation measures.

First, the Specific Plan EIR found that the air quality impacts would be significant and unavoidable. (Specific Plan EIR, Executive Summary, p. 2.0-17 & 2.0-19—20).

The Specific Plan EIR finds that air quality impacts to sensitive receptors can be 10-88
reduced to the level of insignificance through certain mitigation measures MM 5.15-1 through 5.15-7, which are in fact traffic impact mitigation measures, including the requirement of preparing a traffic mitigation plan. (EIR, p. 2.0-20 & p. 2.0-38—41.) Second, the Specific Plan EIR found GH G impacts would be significant and unavoidable. (Specific Plan EIR, Executive Summary, p. 2.0-17 & 2.0-19.) The EIR proposed several Mitigation Measures, including providing EV chargers consistent with the City’s requirements, energy efficient appliances, cool roofs, etc. However, in view of the new information about the Project’s branding by Disney and its Disney theme, it is now clear that the mitigation measures based on the City’s requirements alone may not be efficient to reduce the Project’s GHG impacts. For example, as shown below, the City’s Municipal Code Section 17.26.030(M) 22 provides:

While these standard City requirements could have been adequate or sufficient for a standard development, it is reasonably foreseeable that Disney’s unique involvement in the Specific Plan or Project will bring more tourism and more cars than initially contemplated or studied in the EIR.
22 See, https://library.qcode.us/lib/rancho_mirage_ca/pub/municipal_code/item/title_17- division_iii-chapter_17_26-17_26_030
10-89
Also, it is reasonably foreseeable that, with Disney’s branding and attractions, visitors and tourists will remain at the Project site longer to visit the variety of different attraction places than previously contemplated. Thus, 1 EV charging station with one 120V AC 20 amp and one 208/240V 40 amp charger may not be sufficient per 50 cars, as required by the City’s Municipal Code, especially where 120V AC 20 amp chargers will not be able to charge a car unless used for extended hours.

Therefore, a subsequent or supplemental environmental review and EIR is required to assess the new GHG impacts in view of the increased scope of the Project due to Disney’s branding or involvement, and to provide additional mitigation requirements that are available and can be required to ensure the Project’s GHG and other impacts are mitigated to the extent possible as CEQA requires. This is also warranted under the additionality principle, found in the Health and Safety Code and recently emphasized by the court. (Health & Safety Code section 38562(d)(2) [“the reduction is in addition to any greenhouse gas emission reduction otherwise required by law or regulation, and any other greenhouse gas emission reduction that otherwise would occur”; Golden Door Properties, LLC v. County of San Diego (2020) 50 Cal.App.5th 467, 514-515. [“Additionality is an important requirement because if non-additional (i.e., ‘business-as- usual’) projects are eligible for carbon [offset] ... then the net amount of greenhouse gas emissions will continue to increase and the environmental integrity of carbon reduction projects will be called into question.” Id. at 514].) Third, the EIR found that the traffic impacts would be potentially significant but suggested that with the implementation of mitigation measures MM 5.15-1 through

5.15-7, those will be reduced to the level of insignificance. (EIR, p. 2.0-38—41.) Yet, the mitigation proposed – for both the construction and operation phases – could not be effective in view of the additional restrictions in place since the beginning of COVID-19 (especially for the construction phase), as well as in view of the additional VMT that will be generated in light of the demographics of the City of Rancho Mirage and its lack of affordable housing to house the new hospitality workers, caregivers, or construction workers having to commute longer hours for jobs at the Project site. This is further important where Disney’s branding will attract more people to the area and will require more people to work.

Fourth, the EIR found that the traffic and other impacts would be potentially significant and yet could be reduced through the use of mitigation measures. (Specific Plan EIR, Executive Summary, p. 2.0-17.) And yet, the EIR’s proposed mitigation 10-90
measures are outdated and there are new and more effective mitigation measures available. E.g., the EIR’s mitigation measures for air quality and traffic require the use Tier 3 construction equipment; yet, Tier 4 equipment and trucks are now available, which provide more air quality impact reductions. (See, Specific Plan EIR, Executive Summary, pp. 2.0-17—44, esp. p. 2.0-19—20 [for air quality mitigation measures MM

5.2-1 to MM 5.2-4].)23
Lastly, while the Specific Plan EIR found the air quality and GHG impacts significant and unavoidable and adopted a statement of overriding considerations re same, the fact that those impacts may be more severe is still crucial and must be adequately studied in a subsequent or supplemental EIR for the Project and the entire Specific Plan, along with other impacts that were found to be less than significant and yet may now be found potentially significant and in need of mitigation (e.g., traffic). (We Advocate Through Environmental Review v. County of Siskiyou (2022) 78 Cal.App.5th 683, 695-696 [need to recirculate if more severe impacts].)
F. New Information and Substantial Changes in Circumstances About California’s Exacerbated Drought Conditions Since Early 2020 Indicate New or More Severe Impacts and Require More Mitigation Measures than Considered in the 2019 Specific Plan EIR.

One of the Project’s or Specific Plan’s elements is the creation of a private well to support the 24-acre Lagoon. The Specific Plan’s impact on the water quality and hydrology and particularly groundwater was found to be potentially significant but mitigated to a less than significant level through the payment of impact fees. (Specific Plan EIR, Executive Summary, p. 2.0-31—33.) The EIR provides for the mitigation measure MM5.9-1, which states: “The Project Applicant shall pay groundwater replenishment fees to CVWD to offset the Grand Oasis lagoon private well water usage.” (EIR Executive Summary, p. 2.0-31.) Based on this mitigation measure, the 2019 EIR concludes that the impact of the Project or Specific Plan on groundwater will be less than significant.

However, there is new information that the drought conditions have worsened in 2020, just after the Specific Plan EIR was certified in 2019, which suggests that the EIR’s 23 See, Specific Plan EIR’s Executive Summary, https://files.ceqanet.opr.ca.gov/72272- 2/attachment/8Xhi6Al-V4fvaGOCq4RLQ5zjNaJmIpzIVCRH14-
9_6xXqOB5VgjHgD3NDSD5X33WBTNDmqBTsc7bmZPl0
10-91
proposed mitigation measure of paying impact fees may be inadequate to mitigate water impacts to the level of insignificance.24
Thus, for example, to address the drought conditions, on March 28, 2022, Gov.

Newsom signed Executive Order N-7-22, which takes effect immediately, to prepare for and mitigate the effects of the ongoing drought.25 As relevant here, the Executive Order specifically prohibits issuance of permits for groundwater permits until getting verifications that groundwater is indeed available.26 The Executive Order specifically states, in pertinent parts:

WHEREAS groundwater use accounts for 41 percent of the State's total water supply on an average annual basis but as much as 58 percent in a critically dry year, and approximately 85 percent of public water systems rely on groundwater as their primary supply; and ….

WHEREAS the most consequential, immediate action Californians can take to extend available supplies is to voluntarily reduce their water use by 15 percent from their 2020 levels by implementing the commonsense measures identified in operative paragraph 1 of Executive Order N -10- 21 (July 8, 2021 ); and
WHEREAS to protect public health and safety, it is critical the State take certain immediate actions without undue delay to prepare for and mitigate the effects of the drought conditions, and under Government Code section 8571,
24 See, article about the drought conditions worsening in early 2020 and through this day at https://calmatters.org/environment/2022/02/california-drought-record-january-february/; see also Coachella Valley will begin enforcement of water usage limitations at https://nbcpalmsprings.com/2022/07/28/cvwd-begins-water-overuse-drought-penalties- in-august/; California Governor requesting more water conservation efforts in 2022 https://www.gov.ca.gov/2022/05/23/governor-newsom-convenes-summit-with-local- water-leaders-urges-more-aggressive-response-to-ongoing-drought/ 25 See, article re Governor’s signing of the Executive Order in 2022 at https://www.bhfs.com/insights/alerts-articles/2022/california-steps-up-water- conservation-measures-stops-short-of-statewide-mandate
26 See, Executive Order N-7-22 https://www.gov.ca.gov/wp- content/uploads/2022/03/March-2022-Drought-EO.pdf
10-92
I find that strict compliance with various statutes and regulations specified in this Proclamation would prevent, hinder, or delay the mitigation of the effects of the drought conditions.
….

9. To protect health, safety, and the environment during this drought emergency, a county, city, or other public agency shall not:
a. Approve a permit for a new groundwater well or for alteration of an existing well in a basin subject to the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act and classified as medium- or high-priority without first obtaining written verification from a Groundwater Sustainability Agency managing the basin or area of the basin where the well is proposed to be located that groundwater extraction by the proposed well would not be inconsistent with any sustainable groundwater management program established in any applicable Groundwater Sustainability Plan adopted by that Groundwater Sustainability Agency and would not decrease the likelihood of achieving a sustainability goal for the basin covered by such a plan; or
b. Issue a permit for a new groundwater well or for alteration of an existing well without first determining that extraction of groundwater from the proposed well is (1) not likely to interfere with the production and functioning of existing nearby wells, and (2) not likely to cause subsidence that would adversely impact or damage nearby infrastructure.

This paragraph shall not apply to permits for wells that will provide less than two acre-feet per year of groundwater for individual domestic users, or that will exclusively provide groundwater to public water supply systems as defined in section 116275 of the Health and Safety Code. (2022 Executive Order N-7-22, emph. added.)
Coachella Valley Water District is subject to and adopted resolutions to meet the requirements of the Sustainable Ground Management Act and water conservation requirements.
27 27 See, https://cvwd.org/Blog.aspx?IID=85
10-93
The above-noted changes in circumstances and new information about new conservation measures and requirements to approve a new well permit, as here with the Specific Plan, are critical to the effectiveness of the adopted mitigation measure relied upon in the Specific Plan EIR 2019. As explained by courts, the payment of impact fees may be inadequate if there is no substantial evidence such fee payment will truly mitigate the impact:

These fair share fees correspond to studies that do not obligate the City to undertake any actual mitigation of urban decay. By their own terms, mitigation measures 4.11–2(c) and (d) require the City only to “prepare” the fair share plans. These mitigation measures do not require the City to undertake any action. “[A] commitment to pay fees without any evidence that mitigation will actually occur is inadequate.” (Save Our Peninsula, supra, 87 Cal.App.4th at p. 140, 104 Cal.Rptr.2d 326.) Mitigation measures 4.11– 2(c) and (d) stand in contrast to the “CEQA require[ment] that feasible mitigation measures actually be implemented as a condition of development, and not merely be adopted and then neglected or disregarded.” (Anderson First, supra, 130 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1186–1187, 30 Cal.Rptr.3d 738.)
(California Clean Energy Committee v. City of Woodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 197, emph. original.)
In sum, the worsening drought conditions in California since 2020 and the Governor’s new executive order of 2022 constitute new information and a change in circumstances after the Specific Plan EIR was certified in 2019, requiring preparation of a supplemental or subsequent EIR to evaluate the impacts of the Specific Plan on the groundwater supplies and to determine whether the subdivision to allow a well should be approved without any additional mitigation measures or whether new and additional mitigation measures are required to bring the Project’s or Specific Plan’s water impacts to the level of insignificance as claimed in the 2019 EIR.
28 28 This is regardless of which agency will ultimately grant or approve the well permits since the City’s current approval of the lot subdivision – in reliance on the prior incomplete 2019 EIR and without adequate and timely environmental review of the Project’s impacts – will constitute pre-commitment and amount to post-hoc rationalization for future approvals or permit issuance. (Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 307 [post hoc rationalization condemned by courts]). Also, CEQA requires that environmental considerations be made at the earliest stage possible and not at a stage where such decisions 10-94
For the noted reasons, a CEQA exemption is improper in this case under Guidelines § 15162(a)(2)-(3).

IV. THE PROJECT’S MORE SEVERE INDIVIDUAL AND

CUMULATIVE IMPACTS IN AIR QUALITY, GHG, TRAFFIC, AND
WATER QUALITY, AS REVEALED IN 2022, REQUIRE
MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE AND AN EIR.

CEQA requires mandatory findings of significant impacts where, among other things, the project’s cumulative impacts with other similar projects may have a significant impact and also where the environmental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. (Guidelines § 15065(a)(3)-(4).)
As descried above, there are other related projects and particularly Highway 111 Specific Plan project, which, along with this Project, will further exacerbate the air quality, GHG, traffic and water quality impacts.

Similarly, in light of drought exacerbation since 2020 and new more stringent water conservation requirements after the Specific Plan EIR was certified in 2019, as well as the fact that water shortage, as stated in the Governor’s 2022 Executive Order threatens public health/safety and the environment, the Project and particularly its proposed Lagoon relying on a new well may further deplete the groundwater and exacerbate the water shortage, causing water impacts both individually and cumulatively with other related projects.

Therefore, mandatory findings of significance must be adopted and the respective impacts must be studied and mitigated to the extent feasible in a subsequent or supplemental EIR.

may succumb to various political pressures. (See, Bakersfield Citizens for Loc. Control v. City of Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 1184, 1203 [finding that even though construction of a project pending completion of successful CEQA claim did not moot claims, partial construction of project “generated substantial economic and psychological pressures in favor of the shopping centers as presently approved and partially constructed.”].)

10-95
V. CONCLUSION.

In view of the above-noted concerns, we respectfully request that the Project and its CEQA exemption be denied and the Project properly undergo full CEQA review to address the issues that the prior 2019 EIR did not or could not address.

We also request and demand that the Project be properly noticed and agendized to include both the CEQA exemption determination and the involvement of Disney or its branding and Cotino in the Specific Plan and in the Project at issue.

If the City has any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact my Office.

Sincerely,

Naira Soghbatyan
Attorneys for Southwest Regional
Council of Carpenters

Attached:

March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibit A); Air Quality and GHG Expert Paul Rosenfeld CV (Exhibit B); Air Quality and GHG Expert Matt Hagemann CV (Exhibit C); and May 31, 2022 SWRCC Comment to the City of Rancho Mirage’s Highway 111 Specific Plan EIR (Exhibit D).

10-96

EXHIBIT A
10-97

1 2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
March 8, 2021

Mitchell M. Tsai
155 South El Molino, Suite 104
Pasadena, CA 91101

Subject: Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling Dear Mr. Tsai,
Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (“SWAPE”) is pleased to provide the following draft technical report explaining the significance of worker trips required for construction of land use development projects with respect to the estimation of greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions. The report will also discuss the potential for local hire requirements to reduce the length of worker trips, and consequently, reduced or mitigate the potential GHG impacts.

Worker Trips and Greenhouse Gas Calculations
The California Emissions Estimator Model (“CalEEMod”) is a “statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects.”1 CalEEMod quantifies construction-related emissions associated with land use projects resulting from off-road construction equipment; on-road mobile equipment associated with workers, vendors, and hauling; fugitive dust associated with grading, demolition, truck loading, and on-road vehicles traveling along paved and unpaved roads; and architectural coating activities; and paving.2
The number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CalEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on-road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.3

1 “California Emissions Estimator Model.” CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/home. 2 “California Emissions Estimator Model.” CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/caleemod/home. 3 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 10-98

2 Specifically, the number and length of vehicle trips is utilized to estimate the vehicle miles travelled (“VMT”) associated with construction. Then, utilizing vehicle-class specific EMFAC 2014 emission factors, CalEEMod calculates the vehicle exhaust, evaporative, and dust emissions resulting from construction-related VMT, including personal vehicles for worker commuting.4
Specifically, in order to calculate VMT, CalEEMod multiplies the average daily trip rate by the average overall trip length (see excerpt below):
“VMTd = Σ(Average Daily Trip Rate i * Average Overall Trip Length i) n Where:
n = Number of land uses being modeled.”5
Furthermore, to calculate the on-road emissions associated with worker trips, CalEEMod utilizes the following equation (see excerpt below):
“Emissionspollutant = VMT * EFrunning,pollutant
Where:

Emissionspollutant = emissions from vehicle running for each pollutant VMT = vehicle miles traveled
EFrunning,pollutant = emission factor for running emissions.”6 Thus, there is a direct relationship between trip length and VMT, as well as a direct relationship between VMT and vehicle running emissions. In other words, when the trip length is increased, the VMT and vehicle running emissions increase as a result. Thus, vehicle running emissions can be reduced by decreasing the average overall trip length, by way of a local hire requirement or otherwise.

Default Worker Trip Parameters and Potential Local Hire Requirements As previously discussed, the number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CalEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on-road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.7 In order to understand how local hire requirements and associated worker trip length reductions impact GHG emissions calculations, it is important to consider the CalEEMod default worker trip parameters. CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site-specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project- specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.8 The default number of construction-related worker trips is calculated by multiplying the

4 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14-15. 5 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 23. 6 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 7 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 8 CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 1, 9. 10-99

3 number of pieces of equipment for all phases by 1.25, with the exception of worker trips required for the building construction and architectural coating phases.9 Furthermore, the worker trip vehicle class is a 50/25/25 percent mix of light duty autos, light duty truck class 1 and light duty truck class 2, respectively.”10 Finally, the default worker trip length is consistent with the length of the operational home-to-work vehicle trips.11 The operational home-to-work vehicle trip lengths are:
“[B]ased on the location and urbanization selected on the project characteristic screen. These values were supplied by the air districts or use a default average for the state. Each district (or county) also assigns trip lengths for urban and rural settings” (emphasis added). 12 Thus, the default worker trip length is based on the location and urbanization level selected by the User when modeling emissions. The below table shows the CalEEMod default rural and urban worker trip lengths by air basin (see excerpt below and Attachment A).13
Worker Trip Length by Air Basin
Air Basin Rural (miles) Urban (miles)
Great Basin Valleys 16.8 10.8
Lake County 16.8 10.8
Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Mountain Counties 16.8 10.8
North Central Coast 17.1 12.3
North Coast 16.8 10.8
Northeast Plateau 16.8 10.8
Sacramento Valley 16.8 10.8
Salton Sea 14.6 11
San Diego 16.8 10.8
San Francisco Bay Area 10.8 10.8
San Joaquin Valley 16.8 10.8
South Central Coast 16.8 10.8
South Coast 19.8 14.7
Average 16.47 11.17
Minimum 10.80 10.80
Maximum 19.80 14.70
Range 9.00 3.90

9 “CalEEMod User’s Guide.” CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01_user-39-s-guide2016-3-2_15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 10 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 11 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14. 12 “Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at:
http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02_appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 21. 13 “Appendix D Default Data Tables.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/05_appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-84 – D-86. 10-100

4 As demonstrated above, default rural worker trip lengths for air basins in California vary from 10.8- to 19.8- miles, with an average of 16.47 miles. Furthermore, default urban worker trip lengths vary from 10.8- to 14.7- miles, with an average of 11.17 miles. Thus, while default worker trip lengths vary by location, default urban worker trip lengths tend to be shorter in length. Based on these trends evident in the CalEEMod default worker trip lengths, we can reasonably assume that the efficacy of a local hire requirement is especially dependent upon the urbanization of the project site, as well as the project location.

Practical Application of a Local Hire Requirement and Associated Impact To provide an example of the potential impact of a local hire provision on construction-related GHG emissions, we estimated the significance of a local hire provision for the Village South Specific Plan (“Project”) located in the City of Claremont (“City”). The Project proposed to construct 1,000 residential units, 100,000-SF of retail space, 45,000-SF of office space, as well as a 50-room hotel, on the 24-acre site. The Project location is classified as Urban and lies within the Los Angeles-South Coast County. As a result, the Project has a default worker trip length of 14.7 miles.14 In an effort to evaluate the potential for a local hire provision to reduce the Project’s construction-related GHG emissions, we prepared an updated model, reducing all worker trip lengths to 10 miles (see Attachment B). Our analysis estimates that if a local hire provision with a 10-mile radius were to be implemented, the GHG emissions associated with Project construction would decrease by approximately 17% (see table below and Attachment C).

Local Hire Provision Net Change
Without Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,623
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 120.77 With Local Hire Provision
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,024
Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 100.80 % Decrease in Construction-related GHG Emissions 17%
As demonstrated above, by implementing a local hire provision requiring 10 mile worker trip lengths, the Project could reduce potential GHG emissions associated with construction worker trips. More broadly, any local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction-related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site.

This serves as an example of the potential impacts of local hire requirements on estimated project-level GHG emissions, though it does not indicate that local hire requirements would result in reduced construction-related GHG emission for all projects. As previously described, the significance of a local hire requirement depends on the worker trip length enforced and the default worker trip length for the project’s urbanization level and location.

14 “Appendix D Default Data Tables.” CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/05_appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-85. 10-101

5 Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,

Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.
10-102
Location Type Location Name Rural H-W
(miles)
Urban H-W
(miles)
Air Basin Great Basin 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Lake County 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Mountain 16.8 10.8
Air Basin North Central 17.1 12.3
Air Basin North Coast 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Northeast 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Sacramento 16.8 10.8
Air Basin Salton Sea 14.6 11
Air Basin San Diego 16.8 10.8
Air Basin San Francisco

10.8 10.8
Air Basin San Joaquin 16.8 10.8
Air Basin South Central 16.8 10.8
Air Basin South Coast 19.8 14.7
Air District Amador County 16.8 10.8
Air District Antelope Valley 16.8 10.8
Air District Bay Area AQMD 10.8 10.8
Air District Butte County 12.54 12.54
Air District Calaveras

16.8 10.8
Air District Colusa County 16.8 10.8
Air District El Dorado

16.8 10.8
Air District Feather River 16.8 10.8
Air District Glenn County 16.8 10.8
Air District Great Basin 16.8 10.8
Air District Imperial County 10.2 7.3
Air District Kern County 16.8 10.8
Air District Lake County 16.8 10.8
Air District Lassen County 16.8 10.8
Air District Mariposa

16.8 10.8
Air District Mendocino

16.8 10.8
Air District Modoc County 16.8 10.8
Air District Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Air District Monterey Bay

16.8 10.8
Air District North Coast

16.8 10.8
Air District Northern Sierra 16.8 10.8
Air District Northern

16.8 10.8
Air District Placer County 16.8 10.8
Air District Sacramento 15 10
Attachment A
10-103
Air District San Diego

16.8 10.8
Air District San Joaquin

16.8 10.8
Air District San Luis Obispo

13 13
Air District Santa Barbara

8.3 8.3
Air District Shasta County 16.8 10.8
Air District Siskiyou County

16.8 10.8
Air District South Coast 19.8 14.7
Air District Tehama County 16.8 10.8
Air District Tuolumne 16.8 10.8
Air District Ventura County 16.8 10.8
Air District Yolo/Solano 15 10
County Alameda 10.8 10.8
County Alpine 16.8 10.8
County Amador 16.8 10.8
County Butte 12.54 12.54
County Calaveras 16.8 10.8
County Colusa 16.8 10.8
County Contra Costa 10.8 10.8
County Del Norte 16.8 10.8
County El Dorado-Lake 16.8 10.8
County El Dorado- 16.8 10.8
County Fresno 16.8 10.8
County Glenn 16.8 10.8
County Humboldt 16.8 10.8
County Imperial 10.2 7.3
County Inyo 16.8 10.8
County Kern-Mojave 16.8 10.8
County Kern-San 16.8 10.8
County Kings 16.8 10.8
County Lake 16.8 10.8
County Lassen 16.8 10.8
County Los Angeles- 16.8 10.8
County Los Angeles- 19.8 14.7
County Madera 16.8 10.8
County Marin 10.8 10.8
County Mariposa 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8
County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8
County Merced 16.8 10.8
County Modoc 16.8 10.8
County Mono 16.8 10.8
County Monterey 16.8 10.8
County Napa 10.8 10.8
10-104
County Nevada 16.8 10.8
County Orange 19.8 14.7
County Placer-Lake 16.8 10.8
County Placer-Mountain 16.8 10.8
County Placer- 16.8 10.8
County Plumas 16.8 10.8
County Riverside- 16.8 10.8
County Riverside-

19.8 14.7
County Riverside-Salton 14.6 11
County Riverside-South 19.8 14.7
County Sacramento 15 10
County San Benito 16.8 10.8
County San Bernardino-

16.8 10.8
County San Bernardino-

19.8 14.7
County San Diego 16.8 10.8
County San Francisco 10.8 10.8
County San Joaquin 16.8 10.8
County San Luis Obispo 13 13
County San Mateo 10.8 10.8
County Santa Barbara-

8.3 8.3
County Santa Barbara-

8.3 8.3
County Santa Clara 10.8 10.8
County Santa Cruz 16.8 10.8
County Shasta 16.8 10.8
County Sierra 16.8 10.8
County Siskiyou 16.8 10.8
County Solano- 15 10
County Solano-San 16.8 10.8
County Sonoma-North 16.8 10.8
County Sonoma-San 10.8 10.8
County Stanislaus 16.8 10.8
County Sutter 16.8 10.8
County Tehama 16.8 10.8
County Trinity 16.8 10.8
County Tulare 16.8 10.8
County Tuolumne 16.8 10.8
County Ventura 16.8 10.8
County Yolo 15 10
County Yuba 16.8 10.8
Statewide Statewide 16.8 10.8
10-105
Air Basin Rural (miles) Urban (miles)
Great Basin Valleys 16.8 10.8
Lake County 16.8 10.8
Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8
Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8
Mountain Counties 16.8 10.8
North Central Coast 17.1 12.3
North Coast 16.8 10.8
Northeast Plateau 16.8 10.8
Sacramento Valley 16.8 10.8
Salton Sea 14.6 11
San Diego 16.8 10.8
San Francisco Bay Area 10.8 10.8
San Joaquin Valley 16.8 10.8
South Central Coast 16.8 10.8
South Coast 19.8 14.7
Average 16.47 11.17
Mininum 10.80 10.80
Maximum 19.80 14.70
Range 9.00 3.90
Worker Trip Length by Air Basin
10-106

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2028Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 1 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual Attachment B
10-107
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.

Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.

Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.

Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.

Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.

Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 2 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-108

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 3 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-109

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1713 1.8242 1.1662 2.4000e-
003

0.4169 0.0817 0.4986 0.1795 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 213.1969 213.1969 0.0601 0.0000 214.6993 2022 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 6 1,721.682
6 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
7 2023 0.6148 3.3649 5.6747 0.0178 1.1963 0.0996 1.2959 0.3203 0.0935 0.4138 0.0000 1,627.529 5 1,627.529
5 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492
5 2024 4.1619 0.1335 0.2810 5.9000e-
004

0.0325 6.4700e-
003

0.0390 8.6300e-
003

6.0400e-
003

0.0147 0.0000 52.9078 52.9078 8.0200e-
003

0.0000 53.1082
Maximum 4.1619 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 6 1,721.682
6 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
7 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 4 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-110

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1713 1.8242 1.1662 2.4000e-
003

0.4169 0.0817 0.4986 0.1795 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 213.1967 213.1967 0.0601 0.0000 214.6991 2022 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 3 1,721.682
3 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
3 2023 0.6148 3.3648 5.6747 0.0178 1.1963 0.0996 1.2959 0.3203 0.0935 0.4138 0.0000 1,627.529 1 1,627.529
1 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492
1 2024 4.1619 0.1335 0.2810 5.9000e-
004

0.0325 6.4700e-
003

0.0390 8.6300e-
003

6.0400e-
003

0.0147 0.0000 52.9077 52.9077 8.0200e-
003

0.0000 53.1082
Maximum 4.1619 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 3 1,721.682
3 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918
3 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2021 11-30-2021 1.4103 1.4103
2 12-1-2021 2-28-2022 1.3613 1.3613
3 3-1-2022 5-31-2022 1.1985 1.1985
4 6-1-2022 8-31-2022 1.1921 1.1921
5 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1918 1.1918
6 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.0774 1.0774
7 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 1.0320 1.0320
8 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 1.0260 1.0260
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 5 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-111

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
003

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003

0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073
2 3,896.073
2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283
3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Unmitigated Operational
9 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 1.0265 1.0265
10 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 2.8857 2.8857
11 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.6207 1.6207
Highest 2.8857 2.8857
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 6 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-112

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
003

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003

0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073
2 3,896.073
2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283
3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 7 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-113
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 8 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-114
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 9 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-115

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e-
003

0.0000 7.5100e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e-
004

0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e-
004

0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e-
003

0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 10 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-116

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e-
003

0.0634 0.0148 1.8000e-
004

3.9400e-
003

1.9000e-
004

4.1300e-
003

1.0800e-
003

1.8000e-
004

1.2600e-
003

0.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e-
003

0.0000 17.4869
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.7000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

8.5100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4900e-
003

6.5000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

6.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.2251 2.2251 7.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.2267
Total 2.9000e-
003

0.0641 0.0233 2.0000e-
004

6.4100e-
003

2.1000e-
004

6.6200e-
003

1.7300e-
003

2.0000e-
004

1.9300e-
003

0.0000 19.6816 19.6816 1.2800e-
003

0.0000 19.7136
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e-
003

0.0000 7.5100e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e-
004

0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e-
004

0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e-
003

0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 11 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-117

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e-
003

0.0634 0.0148 1.8000e-
004

3.9400e-
003

1.9000e-
004

4.1300e-
003

1.0800e-
003

1.8000e-
004

1.2600e-
003

0.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e-
003

0.0000 17.4869
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 9.7000e-
004

7.5000e-
004

8.5100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.4900e-
003

6.5000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

6.7000e-
004

0.0000 2.2251 2.2251 7.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.2267
Total 2.9000e-
003

0.0641 0.0233 2.0000e-
004

6.4100e-
003

2.1000e-
004

6.6200e-
003

1.7300e-
003

2.0000e-
004

1.9300e-
003

0.0000 19.6816 19.6816 1.2800e-
003

0.0000 19.7136
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e-
004

0.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e-
004

0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 12 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-118

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.7000e-
004

6.0000e-
004

6.8100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9900e-
003

5.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.7814
Total 7.7000e-
004

6.0000e-
004

6.8100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9900e-
003

5.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.7814
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e-
004

0.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e-
004

0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 13 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-119

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.7000e-
004

6.0000e-
004

6.8100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9900e-
003

5.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.7814
Total 7.7000e-
004

6.0000e-
004

6.8100e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9700e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.9900e-
003

5.2000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

5.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.7814
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e-
003

0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e-
003

0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 14 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-120

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6400e-
003

1.2700e-
003

0.0144 4.0000e-
005

4.1600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

4.2000e-
003

1.1100e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e-
004

0.0000 3.7607
Total 1.6400e-
003

1.2700e-
003

0.0144 4.0000e-
005

4.1600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

4.2000e-
003

1.1100e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e-
004

0.0000 3.7607
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e-
003

0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e-
003

0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 15 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-121

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6400e-
003

1.2700e-
003

0.0144 4.0000e-
005

4.1600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

4.2000e-
003

1.1100e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e-
004

0.0000 3.7607
Total 1.6400e-
003

1.2700e-
003

0.0144 4.0000e-
005

4.1600e-
003

3.0000e-
005

4.2000e-
003

1.1100e-
003

3.0000e-
005

1.1400e-
003

0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e-
004

0.0000 3.7607
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e-
004

5.7200e-
003

5.7200e-
003

5.2600e-
003

5.2600e-
003

0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e-
003

0.0000 19.2414
Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e-
004

0.0807 5.7200e-
003

0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e-
003

0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e-
003

0.0000 19.2414
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 16 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-122

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

2.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.7000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.6684
Total 2.8000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

2.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.7000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.6684
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e-
004

5.7200e-
003

5.7200e-
003

5.2600e-
003

5.2600e-
003

0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e-
003

0.0000 19.2414
Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e-
004

0.0807 5.7200e-
003

0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e-
003

0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e-
003

0.0000 19.2414
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 17 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-123

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

2.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.7000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.6684
Total 2.8000e-
004

2.1000e-
004

2.4400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.7000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.7000e-
004

2.0000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.1000e-
004

0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.6684
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e-
003

0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e-
003

0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 18 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-124

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e-
003

0.1140 3.1800e-
003

0.1171 0.0329 3.0400e-
003

0.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435
Worker 0.4088 0.3066 3.5305 0.0107 1.1103 8.8700e-
003

1.1192 0.2949 8.1700e-
003

0.3031 0.0000 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 0.0000 967.4773
Total 0.4616 2.0027 3.9885 0.0152 1.2243 0.0121 1.2363 0.3278 0.0112 0.3390 0.0000 1,408.795 2 1,408.795
2 0.0530 0.0000 1,410.120
8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e-
003

0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e-
003

0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 19 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-125

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e-
003

0.1140 3.1800e-
003

0.1171 0.0329 3.0400e-
003

0.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435
Worker 0.4088 0.3066 3.5305 0.0107 1.1103 8.8700e-
003

1.1192 0.2949 8.1700e-
003

0.3031 0.0000 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 0.0000 967.4773
Total 0.4616 2.0027 3.9885 0.0152 1.2243 0.0121 1.2363 0.3278 0.0112 0.3390 0.0000 1,408.795 2 1,408.795
2 0.0530 0.0000 1,410.120
8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e-
003

0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e-
003

0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 20 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-126

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e-
003

0.1113 1.4600e-
003

0.1127 0.0321 1.4000e-
003

0.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624
Worker 0.3753 0.2708 3.1696 0.0101 1.0840 8.4100e-
003

1.0924 0.2879 7.7400e-
003

0.2957 0.0000 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 0.0000 909.9291
Total 0.4135 1.5218 3.5707 0.0144 1.1953 9.8700e-
003

1.2051 0.3200 9.1400e-
003

0.3292 0.0000 1,327.336
9 1,327.336
9 0.0462 0.0000 1,328.491
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e-
003

0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e-
003

0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 21 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-127

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e-
003

0.1113 1.4600e-
003

0.1127 0.0321 1.4000e-
003

0.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624
Worker 0.3753 0.2708 3.1696 0.0101 1.0840 8.4100e-
003

1.0924 0.2879 7.7400e-
003

0.2957 0.0000 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 0.0000 909.9291
Total 0.4135 1.5218 3.5707 0.0144 1.1953 9.8700e-
003

1.2051 0.3200 9.1400e-
003

0.3292 0.0000 1,327.336
9 1,327.336
9 0.0462 0.0000 1,328.491
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e-
003

0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e-
004

3.3200e-
003

3.3200e-
003

3.0500e-
003

3.0500e-
003

0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e-
003

0.0000 13.1227
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e-
003

0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e-
004

3.3200e-
003

3.3200e-
003

3.0500e-
003

3.0500e-
003

0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e-
003

0.0000 13.1227
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 22 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-128

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e-
004

2.7000e-
004

3.1200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0800e-
003

2.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.8968
Total 3.7000e-
004

2.7000e-
004

3.1200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0800e-
003

2.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.8968
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e-
003

0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e-
004

3.3200e-
003

3.3200e-
003

3.0500e-
003

3.0500e-
003

0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e-
003

0.0000 13.1227
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e-
003

0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e-
004

3.3200e-
003

3.3200e-
003

3.0500e-
003

3.0500e-
003

0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e-
003

0.0000 13.1227
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 23 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-129

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.7000e-
004

2.7000e-
004

3.1200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0800e-
003

2.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.8968
Total 3.7000e-
004

2.7000e-
004

3.1200e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.0800e-
003

2.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.9000e-
004

0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.8968
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e-
004

5.1500e-
003

5.1500e-
003

4.7400e-
003

4.7400e-
003

0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e-
003

0.0000 22.2073
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e-
004

5.1500e-
003

5.1500e-
003

4.7400e-
003

4.7400e-
003

0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e-
003

0.0000 22.2073
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 24 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-130

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.9000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.9200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.8100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.8200e-
003

4.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.4706
Total 5.9000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.9200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.8100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.8200e-
003

4.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.4706
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e-
004

5.1500e-
003

5.1500e-
003

4.7400e-
003

4.7400e-
003

0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e-
003

0.0000 22.2073
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e-
004

5.1500e-
003

5.1500e-
003

4.7400e-
003

4.7400e-
003

0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e-
003

0.0000 22.2073
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 25 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-131

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.9000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.9200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.8100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.8200e-
003

4.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.4706
Total 5.9000e-
004

4.1000e-
004

4.9200e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.8100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.8200e-
003

4.8000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.9000e-
004

0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.4706
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e-
003

0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e-
004

0.0000 4.4745
Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e-
004

0.0000 4.4745
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 26 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-132

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0101 6.9900e-
003

0.0835 2.8000e-
004

0.0307 2.3000e-
004

0.0309 8.1500e-
003

2.2000e-
004

8.3700e-
003

0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e-
004

0.0000 24.9558
Total 0.0101 6.9900e-
003

0.0835 2.8000e-
004

0.0307 2.3000e-
004

0.0309 8.1500e-
003

2.2000e-
004

8.3700e-
003

0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e-
004

0.0000 24.9558
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e-
003

0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e-
004

0.0000 4.4745
Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e-
004

0.0000 4.4745
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 27 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-133

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0101 6.9900e-
003

0.0835 2.8000e-
004

0.0307 2.3000e-
004

0.0309 8.1500e-
003

2.2000e-
004

8.3700e-
003

0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e-
004

0.0000 24.9558
Total 0.0101 6.9900e-
003

0.0835 2.8000e-
004

0.0307 2.3000e-
004

0.0309 8.1500e-
003

2.2000e-
004

8.3700e-
003

0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e-
004

0.0000 24.9558
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 28 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-134
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Unmitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 29 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-135
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 30 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-136
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003

0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003

0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 31 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-137

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e-
003

0.0188 8.0100e-
003

1.2000e-
004

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

0.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e-
004

4.0000e-
004

21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise

1.30613e
+007

0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e-
003

0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e-
003

0.0230 0.0193 1.4000e-
004

1.7500e-
003

1.7500e-
003

1.7500e-
003

1.7500e-
003

0.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

8.30736e
+006

0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e-
003

0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e- 003

8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel 1.74095e
+006

9.3900e-
003

0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e-
004

6.4900e-
003

6.4900e-
003

6.4900e-
003

6.4900e-
003

0.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e-
003

1.7000e-
003

93.4557
Quality
Restaurant

1.84608e
+006

9.9500e-
003

0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e-
004

6.8800e-
003

6.8800e-
003

6.8800e-
003

6.8800e-
003

0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e-
003

1.8100e-
003

99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e-
004

4.5000e-
003

3.7800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

0.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

4.9301
Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003

0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 32 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-138

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e-
003

0.0188 8.0100e-
003

1.2000e-
004

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

0.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e-
004

4.0000e-
004

21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise

1.30613e
+007

0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e-
003

0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e-
003

0.0230 0.0193 1.4000e-
004

1.7500e-
003

1.7500e-
003

1.7500e-
003

1.7500e-
003

0.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

8.30736e
+006

0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e-
003

0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e- 003

8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel 1.74095e
+006

9.3900e-
003

0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e-
004

6.4900e-
003

6.4900e-
003

6.4900e-
003

6.4900e-
003

0.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e-
003

1.7000e-
003

93.4557
Quality
Restaurant

1.84608e
+006

9.9500e-
003

0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e-
004

6.8800e-
003

6.8800e-
003

6.8800e-
003

6.8800e-
003

0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e-
003

1.8100e-
003

99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e-
004

4.5000e-
003

3.7800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

0.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

4.9301
Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003

0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 33 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-139

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e-
003

2.9000e-
004

33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise

3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e-
003

1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e-
003

1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e-
003

9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e-
003

2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 34 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-140

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e-
003

2.9000e-
004

33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise

3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e-
003

1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e-
003

1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e-
003

9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e-
003

2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 35 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-141
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
003

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Unmitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
003

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e-
003

0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e- 003

3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e-
004

0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e-
003

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 36 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-142

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e-
003

0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e- 003

3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e-
004

0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e-
003

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 37 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-143
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Unmitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 38 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-144

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.62885 /

1.02688

10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e-
003

12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise

63.5252 /

40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building

7.99802 /

4.90201

53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e-
003

61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

10.9272 /

0.697482

51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e-
003

62.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /

0.140927

6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e-
003

7.5079
Quality
Restaurant

2.42827 /

0.154996

11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e-
003

13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center

4.14806 /

2.54236

27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e-
003

31.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 39 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-145

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.62885 /

1.02688

10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e-
003

12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise

63.5252 /

40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building

7.99802 /

4.90201

53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e-
003

61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

10.9272 /

0.697482

51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e-
003

62.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /

0.140927

6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e-
003

7.5079
Quality
Restaurant

2.42827 /

0.154996

11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e-
003

13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center

4.14806 /

2.54236

27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e-
003

31.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 40 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-146
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 41 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-147

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building

41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant

7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center

58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 42 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-148

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building

41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant

7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center

58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 43 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-149

11.0 Vegetation
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PMPage 44 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-150

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2028Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 1 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-151
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.

Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.

Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.

Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.

Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.

Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 2 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-152

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 3 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-153

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2769 46.4588 31.6840 0.0643 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,234.797 4 6,234.797
4 1.9495 0.0000 6,283.535
2 2022 5.3304 38.8967 49.5629 0.1517 9.8688 1.6366 10.7727 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 2023 4.8957 26.3317 46.7567 0.1472 9.8688 0.7794 10.6482 2.6381 0.7322 3.3702 0.0000 14,807.52 69 14,807.52
69 1.0250 0.0000 14,833.15
21 2024 237.1630 9.5575 15.1043 0.0244 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,361.398 9 2,361.398
9 0.7177 0.0000 2,379.342
1 Maximum 237.1630 46.4588 49.5629 0.1517 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 4 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-154

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2769 46.4588 31.6840 0.0643 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,234.797 4 6,234.797
4 1.9495 0.0000 6,283.535
2 2022 5.3304 38.8967 49.5629 0.1517 9.8688 1.6366 10.7727 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 2023 4.8957 26.3317 46.7567 0.1472 9.8688 0.7794 10.6482 2.6381 0.7322 3.3702 0.0000 14,807.52 69 14,807.52
69 1.0250 0.0000 14,833.15
20 2024 237.1630 9.5575 15.1043 0.0244 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,361.398 9 2,361.398
9 0.7177 0.0000 2,379.342
1 Maximum 237.1630 46.4588 49.5629 0.1517 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 15,251.56 74 15,251.56
74 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52
88 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 5 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-155

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 16 76,811.18
16 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87
86 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 16 76,811.18
16 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87
86 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-156

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 7 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-157
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 8 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-158

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 9 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-159

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0643 0.0442 0.6042 1.7100e-
003

0.1677 1.3500e-
003

0.1690 0.0445 1.2500e-
003

0.0457 170.8155 170.8155 5.0300e-
003
170.9413
Total 0.1916 4.1394 1.5644 0.0136 0.4346 0.0139 0.4485 0.1176 0.0133 0.1309 1,463.056 8 1,463.056
8 0.0927 1,465.375
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-160

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0643 0.0442 0.6042 1.7100e-
003

0.1677 1.3500e-
003

0.1690 0.0445 1.2500e-
003

0.0457 170.8155 170.8155 5.0300e-
003
170.9413
Total 0.1916 4.1394 1.5644 0.0136 0.4346 0.0139 0.4485 0.1176 0.0133 0.1309 1,463.056 8 1,463.056
8 0.0927 1,465.375
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-161

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e-
003

0.2012 1.6300e-
003

0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003

0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e-
003
205.1296
Total 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e-
003

0.2012 1.6300e-
003

0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003

0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e-
003
205.1296
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 12 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-162

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e-
003

0.2012 1.6300e-
003

0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003

0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e-
003
205.1296
Total 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e-
003

0.2012 1.6300e-
003

0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003

0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e-
003
205.1296
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 13 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-163

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e-
003

0.2236 1.8100e-
003

0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003

0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e-
003
227.9217
Total 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e-
003

0.2236 1.8100e-
003

0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003

0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e-
003
227.9217
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 14 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-164

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e-
003

0.2236 1.8100e-
003

0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003

0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e-
003
227.9217
Total 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e-
003

0.2236 1.8100e-
003

0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003

0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e-
003
227.9217
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 15 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-165

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e-
003

0.2236 1.7500e-
003

0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003

0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e-
003
219.8941
Total 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e-
003

0.2236 1.7500e-
003

0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003

0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e-
003
219.8941
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 16 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-166

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e-
003

0.2236 1.7500e-
003

0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003

0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e-
003
219.8941
Total 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e-
003

0.2236 1.7500e-
003

0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003

0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e-
003
219.8941
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 17 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-167

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 3.2162 2.1318 29.7654 0.0883 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,800.685 7 8,800.685
7 0.2429 8,806.758
2 Total 3.6242 15.3350 33.1995 0.1247 9.8688 0.0949 9.9637 2.6381 0.0883 2.7263 12,697.23 39 12,697.23
39 0.4665 12,708.89
66 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 18 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-168

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 3.2162 2.1318 29.7654 0.0883 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,800.685 7 8,800.685
7 0.2429 8,806.758
2 Total 3.6242 15.3350 33.1995 0.1247 9.8688 0.0949 9.9637 2.6381 0.0883 2.7263 12,697.23 39 12,697.23
39 0.4665 12,708.89
66 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 19 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-169

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 3.0203 1.9287 27.4113 0.0851 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 8,478.440 8 8,478.440
8 0.2190 8,483.916
0 Total 3.3229 11.9468 30.5127 0.1203 9.8688 0.0797 9.9485 2.6381 0.0738 2.7118 12,252.31 70 12,252.31
70 0.4172 12,262.74
60 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 20 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-170

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 3.0203 1.9287 27.4113 0.0851 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 8,478.440 8 8,478.440
8 0.2190 8,483.916
0 Total 3.3229 11.9468 30.5127 0.1203 9.8688 0.0797 9.9485 2.6381 0.0738 2.7118 12,252.31 70 12,252.31
70 0.4172 12,262.74
60 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 21 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-171

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e-
003

0.1677 1.2800e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e-
003

0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e-
003
158.8748
Total 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e-
003

0.1677 1.2800e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e-
003

0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e-
003
158.8748
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 22 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-172

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e-
003

0.1677 1.2800e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e-
003

0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e-
003
158.8748
Total 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e-
003

0.1677 1.2800e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e-
003

0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e-
003
158.8748
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 23 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-173

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e-
003

0.1677 1.2600e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e-
003

0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e-
003
153.9458
Total 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e-
003

0.1677 1.2600e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e-
003

0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e-
003
153.9458
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 24 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-174

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e-
003

0.1677 1.2600e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e-
003

0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e-
003
153.9458
Total 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e-
003

0.1677 1.2600e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e-
003

0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e-
003
153.9458
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 25 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-175

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Total 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 26 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-176

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Total 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,641.085 2 1,641.085
2 0.0401 1,642.088
6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 27 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-177
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Unmitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 28 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-178
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 29 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-179
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 30 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-180

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e-
004

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003
131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e-
003

2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e-
004

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003
150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e-
003

2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4769.72 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e-
003

0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5057.75 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e-
003

0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
251.616 2.7100e-
003

0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e-
004

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e-
004

5.4000e-
004

29.7778
Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 31 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-181

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise

1.11916 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e-
004

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003
131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e-
003

2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise

35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building

1.28342 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e-
004

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003
150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e-
003

2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

22.7599 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e-
003

0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant

5.05775 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e-
003

0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center

0.251616 2.7100e-
003

0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e-
004

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e-
004

5.4000e-
004

29.7778
Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 32 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-182
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e-
003

0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 33 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-183

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

8.0 Waste Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e-
003

0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 34 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-184

11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PMPage 35 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-185

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2028Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 1 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-186
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.

Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.

Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.

Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.

Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.

Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 2 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-187

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 3 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-188

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2865 46.4651 31.6150 0.0642 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,221.493 7 6,221.493
7 1.9491 0.0000 6,270.221
4 2022 5.7218 38.9024 47.3319 0.1455 9.8688 1.6366 10.7736 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 2023 5.2705 26.4914 44.5936 0.1413 9.8688 0.7800 10.6488 2.6381 0.7328 3.3708 0.0000 14,210.34 24 14,210.34
24 1.0230 0.0000 14,235.91
60 2024 237.2328 9.5610 15.0611 0.0243 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,352.417 8 2,352.417
8 0.7175 0.0000 2,370.355
0 Maximum 237.2328 46.4651 47.3319 0.1455 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 4 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-189

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2865 46.4651 31.6150 0.0642 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 6,221.493 7 6,221.493
7 1.9491 0.0000 6,270.221
4 2022 5.7218 38.9024 47.3319 0.1455 9.8688 1.6366 10.7736 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 2023 5.2705 26.4914 44.5936 0.1413 9.8688 0.7800 10.6488 2.6381 0.7328 3.3708 0.0000 14,210.34 24 14,210.34
24 1.0230 0.0000 14,235.91
60 2024 237.2328 9.5610 15.0611 0.0243 1.7884 0.4698 1.8628 0.4743 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 2,352.417 8 2,352.417
8 0.7175 0.0000 2,370.355
0 Maximum 237.2328 46.4651 47.3319 0.1455 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 14,630.30 99 14,630.30
99 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26
63 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 5 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-190

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 87 74,422.37
87 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44
17 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 87 74,422.37
87 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44
17 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-191

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 7 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-192
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 8 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-193

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 9 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-194

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 5 1,269.855
5 0.0908 1,272.125
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0715 0.0489 0.5524 1.6100e-
003

0.1677 1.3500e-
003

0.1690 0.0445 1.2500e-
003

0.0457 160.8377 160.8377 4.7300e-
003
160.9560
Total 0.2019 4.1943 1.5706 0.0133 0.4346 0.0141 0.4487 0.1176 0.0135 0.1311 1,430.693 2 1,430.693
2 0.0955 1,433.081
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-195

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 5 1,269.855
5 0.0908 1,272.125
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0715 0.0489 0.5524 1.6100e-
003

0.1677 1.3500e-
003

0.1690 0.0445 1.2500e-
003

0.0457 160.8377 160.8377 4.7300e-
003
160.9560
Total 0.2019 4.1943 1.5706 0.0133 0.4346 0.0141 0.4487 0.1176 0.0135 0.1311 1,430.693 2 1,430.693
2 0.0955 1,433.081
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-196

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e-
003

0.2012 1.6300e-
003

0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003

0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e-
003
193.1472
Total 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e-
003

0.2012 1.6300e-
003

0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003

0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e-
003
193.1472
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 12 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-197

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e-
003

0.2012 1.6300e-
003

0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003

0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e-
003
193.1472
Total 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e-
003

0.2012 1.6300e-
003

0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e-
003

0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e-
003
193.1472
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 13 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-198

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e-
003

0.2236 1.8100e-
003

0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003

0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e-
003
214.6080
Total 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e-
003

0.2236 1.8100e-
003

0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003

0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e-
003
214.6080
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 14 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-199

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e-
003

0.2236 1.8100e-
003

0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003

0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e-
003
214.6080
Total 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e-
003

0.2236 1.8100e-
003

0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e-
003

0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e-
003
214.6080
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 15 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-200

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e-
003

0.2236 1.7500e-
003

0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003

0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e-
003
207.0563
Total 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e-
003

0.2236 1.7500e-
003

0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003

0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e-
003
207.0563
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 16 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-201

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e-
003

0.2236 1.7500e-
003

0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003

0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e-
003
207.0563
Total 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e-
003

0.2236 1.7500e-
003

0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e-
003

0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e-
003
207.0563
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 17 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-202

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 3.5872 2.3593 27.1680 0.0832 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,286.901 3 8,286.901
3 0.2282 8,292.605
8 Total 4.0156 15.5266 30.9685 0.1186 9.8688 0.0957 9.9645 2.6381 0.0891 2.7271 12,075.97 63 12,075.97
63 0.4663 12,087.63
41 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 18 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-203

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 3.5872 2.3593 27.1680 0.0832 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 8,286.901 3 8,286.901
3 0.2282 8,292.605
8 Total 4.0156 15.5266 30.9685 0.1186 9.8688 0.0957 9.9645 2.6381 0.0891 2.7271 12,075.97 63 12,075.97
63 0.4663 12,087.63
41 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 19 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-204

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 3.3795 2.1338 24.9725 0.0801 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 7,983.731 8 7,983.731
8 0.2055 7,988.868
3 Total 3.6978 12.1065 28.3496 0.1144 9.8688 0.0803 9.9491 2.6381 0.0743 2.7124 11,655.13 25 11,655.13
25 0.4151 11,665.50
99 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 20 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-205

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 3.3795 2.1338 24.9725 0.0801 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 7,983.731 8 7,983.731
8 0.2055 7,988.868
3 Total 3.6978 12.1065 28.3496 0.1144 9.8688 0.0803 9.9491 2.6381 0.0743 2.7124 11,655.13 25 11,655.13
25 0.4151 11,665.50
99 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 21 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-206

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e-
003

0.1677 1.2800e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e-
003

0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e-
003
149.6043
Total 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e-
003

0.1677 1.2800e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e-
003

0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e-
003
149.6043
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 22 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-207

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e-
003

0.1677 1.2800e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e-
003

0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e-
003
149.6043
Total 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e-
003

0.1677 1.2800e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e-
003

0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e-
003
149.6043
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 23 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-208

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e-
003

0.1677 1.2600e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e-
003

0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e-
003
144.9587
Total 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e-
003

0.1677 1.2600e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e-
003

0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e-
003
144.9587
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 24 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-209

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e-
003

0.1677 1.2600e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e-
003

0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e-
003
144.9587
Total 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e-
003

0.1677 1.2600e-
003

0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e-
003

0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e-
003
144.9587
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 25 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-210

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 0 1,545.286
0 0.0376 1,546.226
2 Total 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 0 1,545.286
0 0.0376 1,546.226
2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 26 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-211

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 0 1,545.286
0 0.0376 1,546.226
2 Total 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 0 1,545.286
0 0.0376 1,546.226
2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 27 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-212
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Unmitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 28 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-213
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 29 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-214
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 30 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-215

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e-
004

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003
131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e-
003

2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e-
004

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003
150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e-
003

2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4769.72 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e-
003

0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5057.75 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e-
003

0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
251.616 2.7100e-
003

0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e-
004

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e-
004

5.4000e-
004

29.7778
Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 31 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-216

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise

1.11916 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e-
004

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003
131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e-
003

2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise

35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building

1.28342 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e-
004

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003
150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e-
003

2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

22.7599 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e-
003

0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant

5.05775 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e-
003

0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center

0.251616 2.7100e-
003

0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e-
004

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e-
004

5.4000e-
004

29.7778
Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 32 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-217
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e-
003

0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 33 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-218

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

8.0 Waste Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e-
003

0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 34 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-219

11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PMPage 35 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-220

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2028Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 1 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-221
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.

Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.

Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.

Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.

Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.

Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 2 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-222

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 3 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-223

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1704 1.8234 1.1577 2.3800e-
003

0.4141 0.0817 0.4958 0.1788 0.0754 0.2542 0.0000 210.7654 210.7654 0.0600 0.0000 212.2661 2022 0.5865 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 4 1,418.655
4 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692
5 2023 0.5190 3.2850 4.7678 0.0147 0.8497 0.0971 0.9468 0.2283 0.0912 0.3195 0.0000 1,342.441 2 1,342.441
2 0.1115 0.0000 1,345.229
1 2024 4.1592 0.1313 0.2557 5.0000e-
004

0.0221 6.3900e-
003

0.0285 5.8700e-
003

5.9700e-
003

0.0118 0.0000 44.6355 44.6355 7.8300e-
003

0.0000 44.8311
Maximum 4.1592 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 4 1,418.655
4 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692
5 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 4 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-224

2.1 Overall Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year tons/yr MT/yr
2021 0.1704 1.8234 1.1577 2.3800e-
003

0.4141 0.0817 0.4958 0.1788 0.0754 0.2542 0.0000 210.7651 210.7651 0.0600 0.0000 212.2658 2022 0.5865 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 0 1,418.655
0 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692
1 2023 0.5190 3.2850 4.7678 0.0147 0.8497 0.0971 0.9468 0.2283 0.0912 0.3195 0.0000 1,342.440 9 1,342.440
9 0.1115 0.0000 1,345.228
7 2024 4.1592 0.1313 0.2557 5.0000e-
004

0.0221 6.3900e-
003

0.0285 5.8700e-
003

5.9700e-
003

0.0118 0.0000 44.6354 44.6354 7.8300e-
003

0.0000 44.8311
Maximum 4.1592 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 0 1,418.655
0 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692
1 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2021 11-30-2021 1.4091 1.4091
2 12-1-2021 2-28-2022 1.3329 1.3329
3 3-1-2022 5-31-2022 1.1499 1.1499
4 6-1-2022 8-31-2022 1.1457 1.1457
5 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1415 1.1415
6 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.0278 1.0278
7 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 0.9868 0.9868
8 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 0.9831 0.9831
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 5 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-225

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
003

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003

0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073
2 3,896.073
2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283
3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Unmitigated Operational
9 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 0.9798 0.9798
10 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 2.8757 2.8757
11 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.6188 1.6188
Highest 2.8757 2.8757
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 6 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-226

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Area 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
003

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Energy 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003

0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 3,896.073
2 3,896.073
2 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283
3 Mobile 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 0.0000 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 29.1632 556.6420 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 07 12,531.15
19 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47
51 Mitigated Operational

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 7 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-227
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 8 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-228
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 9 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-229

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e-
003

0.0000 7.5100e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e-
004

0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e-
004

0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e-
003

0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 10 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-230

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e-
003

0.0634 0.0148 1.8000e-
004

3.9400e-
003

1.9000e-
004

4.1300e-
003

1.0800e-
003

1.8000e-
004

1.2600e-
003

0.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e-
003

0.0000 17.4869
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.2000e-
004

5.3000e-
004

6.0900e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.6800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6900e-
003

4.5000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.6000e-
004

0.0000 1.5281 1.5281 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.5293
Total 2.6500e-
003

0.0639 0.0209 2.0000e-
004

5.6200e-
003

2.0000e-
004

5.8200e-
003

1.5300e-
003

1.9000e-
004

1.7200e-
003

0.0000 18.9847 18.9847 1.2600e-
003

0.0000 19.0161
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 7.5100e-
003

0.0000 7.5100e-
003

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off-Road 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e-
004

0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e-
004

0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e-
003

0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 11 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-231

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 1.9300e-
003

0.0634 0.0148 1.8000e-
004

3.9400e-
003

1.9000e-
004

4.1300e-
003

1.0800e-
003

1.8000e-
004

1.2600e-
003

0.0000 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e-
003

0.0000 17.4869
Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.2000e-
004

5.3000e-
004

6.0900e-
003

2.0000e-
005

1.6800e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.6900e-
003

4.5000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

4.6000e-
004

0.0000 1.5281 1.5281 5.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.5293
Total 2.6500e-
003

0.0639 0.0209 2.0000e-
004

5.6200e-
003

2.0000e-
004

5.8200e-
003

1.5300e-
003

1.9000e-
004

1.7200e-
003

0.0000 18.9847 18.9847 1.2600e-
003

0.0000 19.0161
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e-
004

0.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e-
004

0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 12 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-232

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e-
004

4.3000e-
004

4.8700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3500e-
003

3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

0.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.2234
Total 5.8000e-
004

4.3000e-
004

4.8700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3500e-
003

3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

0.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.2234
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1807 0.0000 0.1807 0.0993 0.0000 0.0993 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e-
004

0.0204 0.0204 0.0188 0.0188 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e-
004

0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 13 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-233

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.8000e-
004

4.3000e-
004

4.8700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3500e-
003

3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

0.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.2234
Total 5.8000e-
004

4.3000e-
004

4.8700e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.3500e-
003

3.6000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.7000e-
004

0.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.2234
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e-
003

0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e-
003

0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 14 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-234

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2200e-
003

9.0000e-
004

0.0103 3.0000e-
005

2.8300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8600e-
003

7.5000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.5828
Total 1.2200e-
003

9.0000e-
004

0.0103 3.0000e-
005

2.8300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8600e-
003

7.5000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.5828
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e-
003

0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e-
003

0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 15 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-235

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2200e-
003

9.0000e-
004

0.0103 3.0000e-
005

2.8300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8600e-
003

7.5000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.5828
Total 1.2200e-
003

9.0000e-
004

0.0103 3.0000e-
005

2.8300e-
003

2.0000e-
005

2.8600e-
003

7.5000e-
004

2.0000e-
005

7.8000e-
004

0.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0000e-
005

0.0000 2.5828
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e-
004

5.7200e-
003

5.7200e-
003

5.2600e-
003

5.2600e-
003

0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e-
003

0.0000 19.2414
Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e-
004

0.0807 5.7200e-
003

0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e-
003

0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e-
003

0.0000 19.2414
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 16 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-236

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.7400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000 5.3000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.4000e-
004

0.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.4590
Total 2.1000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.7400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000 5.3000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.4000e-
004

0.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.4590
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0807 0.0000 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e-
004

5.7200e-
003

5.7200e-
003

5.2600e-
003

5.2600e-
003

0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e-
003

0.0000 19.2414
Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e-
004

0.0807 5.7200e-
003

0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e-
003

0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e-
003

0.0000 19.2414
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 17 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-237

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.1000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.7400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000 5.3000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.4000e-
004

0.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.4590
Total 2.1000e-
004

1.5000e-
004

1.7400e-
003

1.0000e-
005

5.2000e-
004

0.0000 5.3000e-
004

1.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.4000e-
004

0.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.4590
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e-
003

0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e-
003

0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 18 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-238

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e-
003

0.1140 3.1800e-
003

0.1171 0.0329 3.0400e-
003

0.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435
Worker 0.3051 0.2164 2.5233 7.3500e-
003

0.7557 6.2300e-
003

0.7619 0.2007 5.7400e-
003

0.2065 0.0000 663.9936 663.9936 0.0187 0.0000 664.4604
Total 0.3578 1.9125 2.9812 0.0119 0.8696 9.4100e-
003

0.8790 0.2336 8.7800e-
003

0.2424 0.0000 1,105.977
1 1,105.977
1 0.0451 0.0000 1,107.103
9 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e-
003

0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e-
003

0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 19 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-239

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0527 1.6961 0.4580 4.5500e-
003

0.1140 3.1800e-
003

0.1171 0.0329 3.0400e-
003

0.0359 0.0000 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 0.0000 442.6435
Worker 0.3051 0.2164 2.5233 7.3500e-
003

0.7557 6.2300e-
003

0.7619 0.2007 5.7400e-
003

0.2065 0.0000 663.9936 663.9936 0.0187 0.0000 664.4604
Total 0.3578 1.9125 2.9812 0.0119 0.8696 9.4100e-
003

← All documents from this meeting