Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Rancho Mirage City Council
September 1, 2022

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
September 1, 2022
Body
Rancho Mirage City Council
Pages
76
Original file
2.3 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on portal.laserfiche.com. That file is the official record.

0.8790 0.2336 8.7800e-
003

0.2424 0.0000 1,105.977
1 1,105.977
1 0.0451 0.0000 1,107.103
9 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e-
003

0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e-
003

0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 20 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-240

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e-
003

0.1113 1.4600e-
003

0.1127 0.0321 1.4000e-
003

0.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624
Worker 0.2795 0.1910 2.2635 6.9100e-
003

0.7377 5.9100e-
003

0.7436 0.1960 5.4500e-
003

0.2014 0.0000 624.5363 624.5363 0.0164 0.0000 624.9466
Total 0.3177 1.4420 2.6646 0.0112 0.8490 7.3700e-
003

0.8564 0.2281 6.8500e-
003

0.2349 0.0000 1,042.529
4 1,042.529
4 0.0392 0.0000 1,043.509
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e-
003

0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e-
003

0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 21 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-241

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0382 1.2511 0.4011 4.3000e-
003

0.1113 1.4600e-
003

0.1127 0.0321 1.4000e-
003

0.0335 0.0000 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 0.0000 418.5624
Worker 0.2795 0.1910 2.2635 6.9100e-
003

0.7377 5.9100e-
003

0.7436 0.1960 5.4500e-
003

0.2014 0.0000 624.5363 624.5363 0.0164 0.0000 624.9466
Total 0.3177 1.4420 2.6646 0.0112 0.8490 7.3700e-
003

0.8564 0.2281 6.8500e-
003

0.2349 0.0000 1,042.529
4 1,042.529
4 0.0392 0.0000 1,043.509
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e-
003

0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e-
004

3.3200e-
003

3.3200e-
003

3.0500e-
003

3.0500e-
003

0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e-
003

0.0000 13.1227
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e-
003

0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e-
004

3.3200e-
003

3.3200e-
003

3.0500e-
003

3.0500e-
003

0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e-
003

0.0000 13.1227
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 22 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-242

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

2.2300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.3000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.6160
Total 2.8000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

2.2300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.3000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.6160
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 6.7100e-
003

0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e-
004

3.3200e-
003

3.3200e-
003

3.0500e-
003

3.0500e-
003

0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e-
003

0.0000 13.1227
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.7100e-
003

0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e-
004

3.3200e-
003

3.3200e-
003

3.0500e-
003

3.0500e-
003

0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e-
003

0.0000 13.1227
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 23 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-243

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.8000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

2.2300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.3000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.6160
Total 2.8000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

2.2300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

7.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

7.3000e-
004

1.9000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

2.0000e-
004

0.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e-
005

0.0000 0.6160
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e-
004

5.1500e-
003

5.1500e-
003

4.7400e-
003

4.7400e-
003

0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e-
003

0.0000 22.2073
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e-
004

5.1500e-
003

5.1500e-
003

4.7400e-
003

4.7400e-
003

0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e-
003

0.0000 22.2073
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 24 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-244

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.4000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

3.5100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2400e-
003

3.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0100
Total 4.4000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

3.5100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2400e-
003

3.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0100
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Off-Road 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e-
004

5.1500e-
003

5.1500e-
003

4.7400e-
003

4.7400e-
003

0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e-
003

0.0000 22.2073
Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e-
004

5.1500e-
003

5.1500e-
003

4.7400e-
003

4.7400e-
003

0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e-
003

0.0000 22.2073
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 25 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-245

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.4000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

3.5100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2400e-
003

3.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0100
Total 4.4000e-
004

2.9000e-
004

3.5100e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2300e-
003

1.0000e-
005

1.2400e-
003

3.3000e-
004

1.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

0.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.0000e-
005

0.0000 1.0100
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e-
003

0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e-
004

0.0000 4.4745
Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e-
004

0.0000 4.4745
Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 26 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-246

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.4800e-
003

4.9300e-
003

0.0596 1.9000e-
004

0.0209 1.6000e-
004

0.0211 5.5500e-
003

1.5000e-
004

5.7000e-
003

0.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e-
004

0.0000 17.1394
Total 7.4800e-
003

4.9300e-
003

0.0596 1.9000e-
004

0.0209 1.6000e-
004

0.0211 5.5500e-
003

1.5000e-
004

5.7000e-
003

0.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e-
004

0.0000 17.1394
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Archit. Coating 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1600e-
003

0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e-
004

0.0000 4.4745
Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.0000e-
005

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

1.0700e-
003

0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e-
004

0.0000 4.4745
Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 27 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-247

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 7.4800e-
003

4.9300e-
003

0.0596 1.9000e-
004

0.0209 1.6000e-
004

0.0211 5.5500e-
003

1.5000e-
004

5.7000e-
003

0.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e-
004

0.0000 17.1394
Total 7.4800e-
003

4.9300e-
003

0.0596 1.9000e-
004

0.0209 1.6000e-
004

0.0211 5.5500e-
003

1.5000e-
004

5.7000e-
003

0.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e-
004

0.0000 17.1394
Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 28 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-248
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 Unmitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 6 7,620.498
6 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016
2 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 29 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-249
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 30 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-250
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Electricity
Mitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Electricity
Unmitigated

0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,512.646
5 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003

0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003

0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426
7 1,383.426
7 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 31 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-251

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e-
003

0.0188 8.0100e-
003

1.2000e-
004

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

0.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e-
004

4.0000e-
004

21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise

1.30613e
+007

0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e-
003

0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e-
003

0.0230 0.0193 1.4000e-
004

1.7500e-
003

1.7500e-
003

1.7500e-
003

1.7500e-
003

0.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

8.30736e
+006

0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e-
003

0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e- 003

8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel 1.74095e
+006

9.3900e-
003

0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e-
004

6.4900e-
003

6.4900e-
003

6.4900e-
003

6.4900e-
003

0.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e-
003

1.7000e-
003

93.4557
Quality
Restaurant

1.84608e
+006

9.9500e-
003

0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e-
004

6.8800e-
003

6.8800e-
003

6.8800e-
003

6.8800e-
003

0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e-
003

1.8100e-
003

99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e-
004

4.5000e-
003

3.7800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

0.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

4.9301
Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003

0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 32 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-252

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
408494 2.2000e-
003

0.0188 8.0100e-
003

1.2000e-
004

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

1.5200e-
003

0.0000 21.7988 21.7988 4.2000e-
004

4.0000e-
004

21.9284
Apartments Mid
Rise

1.30613e
+007

0.0704 0.6018 0.2561 3.8400e-
003

0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 696.9989 696.9989 0.0134 0.0128 701.1408 General Office
Building
468450 2.5300e-
003

0.0230 0.0193 1.4000e-
004

1.7500e-
003

1.7500e-
003

1.7500e-
003

1.7500e-
003

0.0000 24.9983 24.9983 4.8000e-
004

4.6000e-
004

25.1468
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

8.30736e
+006

0.0448 0.4072 0.3421 2.4400e-
003

0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 443.3124 443.3124 8.5000e- 003

8.1300e-
003
445.9468
Hotel 1.74095e
+006

9.3900e-
003

0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e-
004

6.4900e-
003

6.4900e-
003

6.4900e-
003

6.4900e-
003

0.0000 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e-
003

1.7000e-
003

93.4557
Quality
Restaurant

1.84608e
+006

9.9500e-
003

0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e-
004

6.8800e-
003

6.8800e-
003

6.8800e-
003

6.8800e-
003

0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e-
003

1.8100e-
003

99.0993
Regional
Shopping Center
91840 5.0000e-
004

4.5000e-
003

3.7800e-
003

3.0000e-
005

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

3.4000e-
004

0.0000 4.9009 4.9009 9.0000e-
005

9.0000e-
005

4.9301
Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e-
003

0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426
8 1,383.426
8 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647
8 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 33 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-253

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e-
003

2.9000e-
004

33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise

3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e-
003

1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e-
003

1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e-
003

9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e-
003

2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 34 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-254

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Electricity
Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise
106010 33.7770 1.3900e-
003

2.9000e-
004

33.8978
Apartments Mid
Rise

3.94697e
+006
1,257.587
9 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086
9 General Office
Building
584550 186.2502 7.6900e-
003

1.5900e-
003
186.9165
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

1.58904e
+006
506.3022 0.0209 4.3200e-
003
508.1135
Hotel 550308 175.3399 7.2400e-
003

1.5000e-
003
175.9672
Quality
Restaurant
353120 112.5116 4.6500e-
003

9.6000e-
004
112.9141
Regional
Shopping Center
756000 240.8778 9.9400e-
003

2.0600e-
003
241.7395
Total 2,512.646
5 0.1037 0.0215 2,521.635
6 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 35 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-255
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category tons/yr MT/yr
Mitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
003

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Unmitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e-
003

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e-
003

0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e- 003

3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e-
004

0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e-
003

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 36 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-256

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr
Architectural
Coating

0.4137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer
Products

4.3998 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0206 0.1763 0.0750 1.1200e-
003

0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 204.1166 204.1166 3.9100e- 003

3.7400e-
003
205.3295
Landscaping 0.3096 0.1187 10.3054 5.4000e-
004

0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e-
003

0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 003
222.5835
Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 37 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-257
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category MT/yr
Mitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Unmitigated 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 38 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-258

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.62885 /

1.02688

10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e-
003

12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise

63.5252 /

40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building

7.99802 /

4.90201

53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e-
003

61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

10.9272 /

0.697482

51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e-
003

62.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /

0.140927

6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e-
003

7.5079
Quality
Restaurant

2.42827 /

0.154996

11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e-
003

13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center

4.14806 /

2.54236

27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e-
003

31.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 39 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-259

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.2 Water by Land Use
Indoor/Out
door Use
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use Mgal MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

1.62885 /

1.02688

10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e-
003

12.6471
Apartments Mid
Rise

63.5252 /

40.0485
425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363
General Office
Building

7.99802 /

4.90201

53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e-
003

61.6019
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

10.9272 /

0.697482

51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e-
003

62.8482
Hotel 1.26834 /

0.140927

6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e-
003

7.5079
Quality
Restaurant

2.42827 /

0.154996

11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e-
003

13.9663
Regional
Shopping Center

4.14806 /

2.54236

27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e-
003

31.9490
Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567
Mitigated

8.0 Waste Detail
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 40 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-260
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Category/Year
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 41 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-261

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building

41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant

7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center

58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 42 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-262

8.2 Waste by Land Use
Waste
Disposed
Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use tons MT/yr
Apartments Low
Rise

11.5 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834
Apartments Mid
Rise
448.5 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 225.5513
General Office
Building

41.85 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 21.0464
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
428.4 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430
Hotel 27.38 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 13.7694
Quality
Restaurant

7.3 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712
Regional
Shopping Center

58.8 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706
Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354
Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 43 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-263

11.0 Vegetation
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PMPage 44 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Annual 10-264

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2028Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 1 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-265
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.

Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.

Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.

Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.

Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.

Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 2 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-266

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 3 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-267

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2561 46.4415 31.4494 0.0636 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 6,163.416 6 6,163.416
6 1.9475 0.0000 6,212.103
9 2022 4.5441 38.8811 40.8776 0.1240 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 12,493.44 03 12,493.44
03 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57
07 2023 4.1534 25.7658 38.7457 0.1206 7.0088 0.7592 7.7679 1.8799 0.7136 2.5935 0.0000 12,150.48 90 12,150.48
90 0.9589 0.0000 12,174.46
15 2024 237.0219 9.5478 14.9642 0.0239 1.2171 0.4694 1.2875 0.3229 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 2,313.180 8 2,313.180
8 0.7166 0.0000 2,331.095
6 Maximum 237.0219 46.4415 40.8776 0.1240 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,493.44 03 12,493.44
03 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57
07 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 4 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-268

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2561 46.4415 31.4494 0.0636 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 6,163.416 6 6,163.416
6 1.9475 0.0000 6,212.103
9 2022 4.5441 38.8811 40.8776 0.1240 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 12,493.44 03 12,493.44
03 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57
07 2023 4.1534 25.7658 38.7457 0.1206 7.0088 0.7592 7.7679 1.8799 0.7136 2.5935 0.0000 12,150.48 90 12,150.48
90 0.9589 0.0000 12,174.46
15 2024 237.0219 9.5478 14.9642 0.0239 1.2171 0.4694 1.2875 0.3229 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 2,313.180 8 2,313.180
8 0.7166 0.0000 2,331.095
5 Maximum 237.0219 46.4415 40.8776 0.1240 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,493.44 03 12,493.44
03 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57
07 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 5 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-269

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 16 76,811.18
16 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87
86 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 16 76,811.18
16 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87
86 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-270

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 7 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-271
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 8 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-272

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 9 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-273

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0487 0.0313 0.4282 1.1800e-
003

0.1141 9.5000e-
004

0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e-
004

0.0311 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e-
003
117.3678
Total 0.1760 4.1265 1.3884 0.0131 0.3810 0.0135 0.3946 0.1034 0.0129 0.1163 1,409.521 2 1,409.521
2 0.0912 1,411.801
5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-274

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 3 1,292.241
3 0.0877 1,294.433
7 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0487 0.0313 0.4282 1.1800e-
003

0.1141 9.5000e-
004

0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e-
004

0.0311 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e-
003
117.3678
Total 0.1760 4.1265 1.3884 0.0131 0.3810 0.0135 0.3946 0.1034 0.0129 0.1163 1,409.521 2 1,409.521
2 0.0912 1,411.801
5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-275

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e-
003

0.1369 1.1400e-
003

0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e-
003

0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Total 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e-
003

0.1369 1.1400e-
003

0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e-
003

0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 12 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-276

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e-
003

0.1369 1.1400e-
003

0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e-
003

0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Total 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e-
003

0.1369 1.1400e-
003

0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e-
003

0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e-
003
140.8414
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 13 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-277

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e-
003

0.1521 1.2700e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e-
003

0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Total 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e-
003

0.1521 1.2700e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e-
003

0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 14 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-278

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e-
003

0.1521 1.2700e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e-
003

0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Total 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e-
003

0.1521 1.2700e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e-
003

0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e-
003
156.4904
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 15 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-279

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e-
003

0.1521 1.2300e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e-
003

0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Total 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e-
003

0.1521 1.2300e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e-
003

0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 16 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-280

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e-
003

0.1521 1.2300e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e-
003

0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Total 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e-
003

0.1521 1.2300e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e-
003

0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e-
003
150.9813
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 17 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-281

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 2.4299 1.5074 21.0801 0.0607 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 6,042.558 5 6,042.558
5 0.1697 6,046.800
0 Total 2.8378 14.7106 24.5142 0.0971 7.0087 0.0741 7.0828 1.8799 0.0691 1.9490 9,939.106 7 9,939.106
7 0.3933 9,948.938
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 18 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-282

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4079 13.2032 3.4341 0.0364 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 2 3,896.548
2 0.2236 3,902.138
4 Worker 2.4299 1.5074 21.0801 0.0607 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 6,042.558 5 6,042.558
5 0.1697 6,046.800
0 Total 2.8378 14.7106 24.5142 0.0971 7.0087 0.0741 7.0828 1.8799 0.0691 1.9490 9,939.106 7 9,939.106
7 0.3933 9,948.938
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 19 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-283

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 2.2780 1.3628 19.4002 0.0584 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,821.402 8 5,821.402
8 0.1529 5,825.225
4 Total 2.5807 11.3809 22.5017 0.0936 7.0088 0.0595 7.0682 1.8799 0.0552 1.9350 9,595.279 0 9,595.279
0 0.3511 9,604.055
4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 20 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-284

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3027 10.0181 3.1014 0.0352 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 3,773.876 2 3,773.876
2 0.1982 3,778.830
0 Worker 2.2780 1.3628 19.4002 0.0584 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,821.402 8 5,821.402
8 0.1529 5,825.225
4 Total 2.5807 11.3809 22.5017 0.0936 7.0088 0.0595 7.0682 1.8799 0.0552 1.9350 9,595.279 0 9,595.279
0 0.3511 9,604.055
4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 21 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-285

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e-
003

0.1141 9.0000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e-
004

0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Total 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e-
003

0.1141 9.0000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e-
004

0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 22 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-286

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e-
003

0.1141 9.0000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e-
004

0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Total 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e-
003

0.1141 9.0000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e-
004

0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e-
003
109.0866
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 23 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-287

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e-
003

0.1141 8.8000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e-
004

0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Total 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e-
003

0.1141 8.8000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e-
004

0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 24 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-288

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e-
003

0.1141 8.8000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e-
004

0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Total 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e-
003

0.1141 8.8000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e-
004

0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e-
003
105.6992
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 25 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-289

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e-
003

1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003

0.3315 1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280 1,127.458
3 Total 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e-
003

1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003

0.3315 1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280 1,127.458
3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 26 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-290

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e-
003

1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003

0.3315 1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280 1,127.458
3 Total 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e-
003

1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003

0.3315 1,126.758
3 1,126.758
3 0.0280 1,127.458
3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 27 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-291
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 Unmitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 34 50,306.60
34 2.1807 50,361.12
08 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 28 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-292
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 29 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-293
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 30 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-294

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e-
004

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003
131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e-
003

2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e-
004

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003
150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e-
003

2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4769.72 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e-
003

0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5057.75 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e-
003

0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
251.616 2.7100e-
003

0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e-
004

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e-
004

5.4000e-
004

29.7778
Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 31 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-295

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise

1.11916 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e-
004

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003
131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e-
003

2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise

35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building

1.28342 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e-
004

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003
150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e-
003

2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

22.7599 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e-
003

0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant

5.05775 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e-
003

0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center

0.251616 2.7100e-
003

0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e-
004

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e-
004

5.4000e-
004

29.7778
Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 32 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-296
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e-
003

0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 33 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-297

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

8.0 Waste Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e-
003

0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 34 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-298

11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PMPage 35 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Summer 10-299

1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 1000sqft 1.03 45,000.00 0 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 36.00 1000sqft 0.83 36,000.00 0 Hotel 50.00 Room 1.67 72,600.00 0
Quality Restaurant 8.00 1000sqft 0.18 8,000.00 0
Apartments Low Rise 25.00 Dwelling Unit 1.56 25,000.00 72 Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 Dwelling Unit 25.66 975,000.00 2789 Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sqft 1.29 56,000.00 0

1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization
Climate Zone
Urban
9 Wind Speed (m/s) Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 33

1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data

1.0 Project Characteristics
Utility Company Southern California Edison
2028Operational Year
CO2 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
702.44 0.029CH4 Intensity
(lb/MWhr)

0.006N2O Intensity
(lb/MWhr)
Village South Specific Plan (Proposed)
Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 1 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-300
Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model.

Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses.

Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths.

Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition.

Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips.

Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood-burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces.

Energy Use -
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction-related mitigation.

Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures.

Trips and VMT - Local hire provision
Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 1.25 0.00
tblFireplaces NumberWood 48.75 0.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.17
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 3.87
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 2.46 1.39
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 158.37 79.82
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 2 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-301

2.0 Emissions Summary
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 94.36 63.99
tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 10.74
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.16
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 4.18
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.05 0.69
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 131.84 78.27
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 72.16 57.65
tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 6.39
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 5.83
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 4.13
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 11.03 6.41
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 127.15 65.80
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 3.84
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 89.95 62.64
tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.70 9.43
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 1.25 0.00
tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 48.75 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveDayYear 25.00 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 3 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-302

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2621 46.4460 31.4068 0.0635 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 6,154.337 7 6,154.337
7 1.9472 0.0000 6,203.018
6 2022 4.7966 38.8851 39.6338 0.1195 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 12,035.34 40 12,035.34
40 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60
13 2023 4.3939 25.8648 37.5031 0.1162 7.0088 0.7598 7.7685 1.8799 0.7142 2.5940 0.0000 11,710.40 80 11,710.40
80 0.9617 0.0000 11,734.44
97 2024 237.0656 9.5503 14.9372 0.0238 1.2171 0.4694 1.2875 0.3229 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 2,307.051 7 2,307.051
7 0.7164 0.0000 2,324.962
7 Maximum 237.0656 46.4460 39.6338 0.1195 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,035.34 40 12,035.34
40 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60
13 Unmitigated Construction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 4 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-303

2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Year lb/day lb/day
2021 4.2621 46.4460 31.4068 0.0635 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 6,154.337 7 6,154.337
7 1.9472 0.0000 6,203.018
6 2022 4.7966 38.8851 39.6338 0.1195 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 12,035.34 40 12,035.34
40 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60
13 2023 4.3939 25.8648 37.5031 0.1162 7.0088 0.7598 7.7685 1.8799 0.7142 2.5940 0.0000 11,710.40 80 11,710.40
80 0.9617 0.0000 11,734.44
97 2024 237.0656 9.5503 14.9372 0.0238 1.2171 0.4694 1.2875 0.3229 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 2,307.051 7 2,307.051
7 0.7164 0.0000 2,324.962
7 Maximum 237.0656 46.4460 39.6338 0.1195 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,035.34 40 12,035.34
40 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60
13 Mitigated Construction
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 5 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-304

2.2 Overall Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 87 74,422.37
87 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44
17 Unmitigated Operational
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Area 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Energy 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mobile 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 87 74,422.37
87 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44
17 Mitigated Operational
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 6 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-305

3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Number
Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days
Week
Num Days Phase Description
1 Demolition Demolition 9/1/2021 10/12/2021 5 30
2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 10/13/2021 11/9/2021 5 20 3 Grading Grading 11/10/2021 1/11/2022 5 45
4 Building Construction Building Construction 1/12/2022 12/12/2023 5 500 5 Paving Paving 12/13/2023 1/30/2024 5 35
6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5 35 OffRoad Equipment
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e
Percent
Reduction

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non-Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating ±sqft)
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5
Acres of Paving: 0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 7 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-306
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73
Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38
Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40
Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 158 0.38
Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41
Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40
Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 367 0.48
Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37
Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29
Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20
Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74
Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45
Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42
Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 132 0.36
Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38
Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 8 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-307

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site

3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Phase Name Offroad Equipment
Count
Worker Trip
Number
Vendor Trip
Number
Hauling Trip
Number
Worker Trip
Length
Vendor Trip
Length
Hauling Trip
Length
Worker Vehicle
Class
Vendor
Vehicle Class
Hauling
Vehicle Class
Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 458.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 801.00 143.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 160.00 0.00 0.00 10.00 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 9 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-308

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 5 1,269.855
5 0.0908 1,272.125
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0532 0.0346 0.3963 1.1100e-
003

0.1141 9.5000e-
004

0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e-
004

0.0311 110.4707 110.4707 3.3300e-
003
110.5539
Total 0.1835 4.1800 1.4144 0.0128 0.3810 0.0137 0.3948 0.1034 0.0131 0.1165 1,380.326 2 1,380.326
2 0.0941 1,382.679
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 9 3,747.944
9 1.0549 3,774.317
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 10 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-309

3.2 Demolition - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 5 1,269.855
5 0.0908 1,272.125
2 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0532 0.0346 0.3963 1.1100e-
003

0.1141 9.5000e-
004

0.1151 0.0303 8.8000e-
004

0.0311 110.4707 110.4707 3.3300e-
003
110.5539
Total 0.1835 4.1800 1.4144 0.0128 0.3810 0.0137 0.3948 0.1034 0.0131 0.1165 1,380.326 2 1,380.326
2 0.0941 1,382.679
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 11 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-310

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e-
003

0.1369 1.1400e-
003

0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e-
003

0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Total 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e-
003

0.1369 1.1400e-
003

0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e-
003

0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 9 3,685.656
9 1.1920 3,715.457
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 12 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-311

3.3 Site Preparation - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e-
003

0.1369 1.1400e-
003

0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e-
003

0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Total 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e-
003

0.1369 1.1400e-
003

0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e-
003

0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e-
003
132.6646
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 13 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-312

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e-
003

0.1521 1.2700e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e-
003

0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Total 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e-
003

0.1521 1.2700e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e-
003

0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 4 6,007.043
4 1.9428 6,055.613
4 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 14 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-313

3.4 Grading - 2021
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e-
003

0.1521 1.2700e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e-
003

0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Total 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e-
003

0.1521 1.2700e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e-
003

0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e-
003
147.4051
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 15 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-314

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e-
003

0.1521 1.2300e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e-
003

0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Total 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e-
003

0.1521 1.2300e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e-
003

0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Fugitive Dust 8.6733 0.0000 8.6733 3.5965 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 5 6,011.410
5 1.9442 6,060.015
8 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 16 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-315

3.4 Grading - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e-
003

0.1521 1.2300e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e-
003

0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Total 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e-
003

0.1521 1.2300e-
003

0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e-
003

0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.0000e-
003
142.2207
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 17 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-316

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 2.6620 1.6677 19.4699 0.0571 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 5,691.935 4 5,691.935
4 0.1602 5,695.940
8 Total 3.0904 14.8350 23.2704 0.0926 7.0087 0.0749 7.0836 1.8799 0.0699 1.9498 9,481.010 4 9,481.010
4 0.3984 9,490.969
1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333
6 0.6120 2,569.632
2 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 18 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-317

3.5 Building Construction - 2022
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.4284 13.1673 3.8005 0.0354 0.9155 0.0256 0.9412 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 0 3,789.075
0 0.2381 3,795.028
3 Worker 2.6620 1.6677 19.4699 0.0571 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 5,691.935 4 5,691.935
4 0.1602 5,695.940
8 Total 3.0904 14.8350 23.2704 0.0926 7.0087 0.0749 7.0836 1.8799 0.0699 1.9498 9,481.010 4 9,481.010
4 0.3984 9,490.969
1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 19 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-318

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 2.5029 1.5073 17.8820 0.0550 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,483.797 4 5,483.797
4 0.1442 5,487.402
0 Total 2.8211 11.4799 21.2591 0.0893 7.0088 0.0601 7.0688 1.8799 0.0557 1.9356 9,155.198 1 9,155.198
1 0.3538 9,164.043
7 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209
9 0.6079 2,570.406
1 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 20 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-319

3.5 Building Construction - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.3183 9.9726 3.3771 0.0343 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 3,671.400 7 3,671.400
7 0.2096 3,676.641
7 Worker 2.5029 1.5073 17.8820 0.0550 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,483.797 4 5,483.797
4 0.1442 5,487.402
0 Total 2.8211 11.4799 21.2591 0.0893 7.0088 0.0601 7.0688 1.8799 0.0557 1.9356 9,155.198 1 9,155.198
1 0.3538 9,164.043
7 Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 21 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-320

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e-
003

0.1141 9.0000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e-
004

0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Total 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e-
003

0.1141 9.0000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e-
004

0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 1 2,207.584
1 0.7140 2,225.433
6 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 22 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-321

3.6 Paving - 2023
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e-
003

0.1141 9.0000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e-
004

0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Total 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e-
003

0.1141 9.0000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e-
004

0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e-
003
102.7603
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 23 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-322

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.0000e-
003

0.1141 8.8000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e-
004

0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e-
003

99.5663
Total 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.0000e-
003

0.1141 8.8000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e-
004

0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e-
003

99.5663
Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Off-Road 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Paving 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2 2,207.547
2 0.7140 2,225.396
3 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 24 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-323

3.6 Paving - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.0000e-
003

0.1141 8.8000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e-
004

0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e-
003

99.5663
Total 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.0000e-
003

0.1141 8.8000e-
004

0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e-
004

0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e-
003

99.5663
Mitigated Construction Off-Site

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 25 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-324

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e-
003

1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003

0.3315 1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264 1,062.041
0 Total 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e-
003

1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003

0.3315 1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264 1,062.041
0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Archit. Coating 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e-
003

0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 26 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-325

4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile

4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile

3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e-
003

1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003

0.3315 1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264 1,062.041
0 Total 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e-
003

1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e-
003

0.3315 1,061.381
8 1,061.381
8 0.0264 1,062.041
0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 27 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-326
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 Unmitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 47,917.80 05 47,917.80
05 2.1953 47,972.68
39 4.2 Trip Summary Information

4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated
Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise 145.75 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 Apartments Mid Rise 4,026.75 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 General Office Building 288.45 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) 2,368.80 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 Hotel 192.00 187.50 160.00 445,703 445,703
Quality Restaurant 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 Regional Shopping Center 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 28 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-327
Miles Trip % Trip Purpose %
Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 19 4 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

16.60 8.40 6.90 8.50 72.50 19.00 37 20 43
Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4
Quality Restaurant 16.60 8.40 6.90 12.00 69.00 19.00 38 18 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11

5.0 Energy Detail

5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy

4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Apartments Mid Rise 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 General Office Building 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 High Turnover (Sit Down
Restaurant)

0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Hotel 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Quality Restaurant 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088 0.044216 0.209971 0.116369 0.014033 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.002613 0.001817 0.005285 0.000712 0.000821 Historical Energy Use: N
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 29 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-328
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
NaturalGas
Mitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 NaturalGas
Unmitigated

0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 30 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-329

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise
1119.16 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e-
004

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003
131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e-
003

2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise
35784.3 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building
1283.42 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e-
004

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003
150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e-
003

2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)
22759.9 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4769.72 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e-
003

0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant
5057.75 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e-
003

0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center
251.616 2.7100e-
003

0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e-
004

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e-
004

5.4000e-
004

29.7778
Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 31 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-330

6.1 Mitigation Measures Area

6.0 Area Detail

5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
NaturalGa
s Use
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day
Apartments Low
Rise

1.11916 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e-
004

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003

8.3400e-
003
131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e-
003

2.4100e-
003
132.4486
Apartments Mid
Rise

35.7843 0.3859 3.2978 1.4033 0.0211 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 0.2666 4,209.916 4 4,209.916
4 0.0807 0.0772 4,234.933
9 General Office
Building

1.28342 0.0138 0.1258 0.1057 7.5000e-
004

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003

9.5600e-
003
150.9911 150.9911 2.8900e-
003

2.7700e-
003
151.8884
High Turnover (Sit
Down Restaurant)

22.7599 0.2455 2.2314 1.8743 0.0134 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 0.1696 2,677.634 2 2,677.634
2 0.0513 0.0491 2,693.546
0 Hotel 4.76972 0.0514 0.4676 0.3928 2.8100e-
003

0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 0.0355 561.1436 561.1436 0.0108 0.0103 564.4782 Quality
Restaurant

5.05775 0.0545 0.4959 0.4165 2.9800e-
003

0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 0.0377 595.0298 595.0298 0.0114 0.0109 598.5658 Regional
Shopping Center

0.251616 2.7100e-
003

0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e-
004

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

1.8700e-
003

29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e-
004

5.4000e-
004

29.7778
Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 2 8,355.983
2 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638
7 Mitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 32 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-331
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
Category lb/day lb/day
Mitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e-
003

0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Unmitigated
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 33 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-332

8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste

7.1 Mitigation Measures Water

7.0 Water Detail

8.0 Waste Detail

6.2 Area by SubCategory
ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e
SubCategory lb/day lb/day
Architectural
Coating

2.2670 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Consumer
Products

24.1085 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Hearth 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 00 18,000.00
00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96
50 Landscaping 2.4766 0.9496 82.4430 4.3600e-
003

0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 0.4574 148.5950 148.5950 0.1424 152.1542 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 50 18,148.59
50 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11
92 Mitigated

9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type

10.0 Stationary Equipment
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 34 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-333

11.0 Vegetation
Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PMPage 35 of 35 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles-South Coast County, Winter 10-334
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,623
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 120.77
Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) 3,024
Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 100.80
% Decrease in Construction-related GHG Emissions 17%
Local Hire Provision Net Change
With Local Hire Provision
Without Local Hire Provision
Attachment C
10-335

EXHIBIT B
10-336

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 June 2019

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist

Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience

Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years’ experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling operations, oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, and many other industrial and agricultural sources. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at dozens of sites and has testified as an expert witness on more than ten cases involving exposure to air contaminants from industrial sources.

10-337

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 June 2019

Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist

Publications:

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48

Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342

Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science , 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

10-338

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 June 2019

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds , 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

10-339

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 June 2019

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. ( 1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. ( 1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water .

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E . (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting , Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting . Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P . (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant . The 23 rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water . Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

10-340

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 June 2019

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water . Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting . Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006 . Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility . APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference . Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants . Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference .

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust .

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

10-341

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 June 2019

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association . Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E ., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants .. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D . (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E . and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association . Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association . Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conferenc e. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. ( October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. ( 2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E ., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings . Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

10-342

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 June 2019

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America . Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993
10-343

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 June 2019

Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019

In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19

In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case: No 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018

In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112 th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017

In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017

In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018

In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017

10-344

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 June 2019

In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017

In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015

In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015

In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Jerry Dovico, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015

In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County
Doug Pauls, et al.,, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015

In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015

In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico Betty Gonzalez, et al. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy, Del Oro Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward DeRuyter, Defendants
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015

In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015

In the Circuit Court of the 17th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014

In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill, et al. Defendants.

Case No. 5:12-cv-01152-C
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014

10-345

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 June 2019

In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012

In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassler, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Defendant.

Case 3:10-cv-00622
Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013

In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland
Philip E. Cvach, II et al., Plaintiffs vs. Two Farms, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013

10-346

EXHIBIT C
10-347
1640 5th St.., Suite 204 Santa
Santa Monica, California 90401
Tel: (949) 887‐9013
Email: [email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic
and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring.

Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden
West College, 2010 – 2014;
• Senior Environmental Analyst,
Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003);
10-348
• Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA.
• Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.
• Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the deve lopment of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
10-349
• Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. 10-350
• Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sol e Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
10-351
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal M ulti‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 10-352
Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.
10-353

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.
10-354

Hagemann, M.F ., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential Water Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F ., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M. F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 10-355
Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009‐ 2011.
10-356

VIA E-MAIL
May 31, 2022
Majna Dukic, Planning Manager
City of Rancho Mirage
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Em: [email protected]

Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
City of Rancho Mirage
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Em: [email protected]

RE: Highway 111 Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report SCH No. 2020069010 – Supplemental Comment Letter
Dear Majna Dukic and Kristie Ramos,
On behalf of the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters (“SWRCC” or “Southwest Carpenters”), my Office is submitting these supplemental comments on the City of Rancho Mirage’s (“City” or “Lead Agency”) Draft Environmental Impact Report (“Draft EIR” or “DEIR”) for the Highway 111 Specific Plan (“Project”).

These supplemental comments fully incorporate by reference our prior comments submitted on March 14, 2022.

These supplemental comments note further errors in the Draft EIR, specifically related to the EIR’s air quality & greenhouse gas emission (“GHG”), as well as traffic impacts & vehicle miles traveled (“VMT”) analysis and baseline assumptions, as identified by our experts’ review. These supplemental comments also recommend additional mitigation measures for those areas of impact.

10-357
I. THE DRAFT EIR VIOLATES CEQA AS IT UNDERSTATES

SIGNIFICANT AIR QUALITY & GHG IMPACTS DUE TO
ERRORS IN ANALYSIS AND BASELINE ASSUMPTIONS.

Based on the March 28, 2022 expert report from SWAPE’s Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld (see, Exhibit 1 [3/28/2022 SWAPE Expert Report]), the Draft EIR’s air quality & GHG analysis, baseline assumptions and mitigations measures are inadequate. SWAPE concludes:

An updated EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and greenhouse gas impacts that buildout of the Specific Plan may have on the surrounding environment.

Exhibit 1, p. 1.

The reasons for SWAPE’s conclusion are: (1) the EIR’s failure to mitigate the cumulative impacts of air quality emissions which the EIR acknowledged; (2) the EIR’s inadequate evaluation and mitigation of GHG impacts, including improper deferred mitigation; and (3) the EIR’s failure to incorporate feasible mitigation measures for GHG emissions.

A. The EIR Failed to Mitigate Cumulative Air Quality Impacts.

SWAPE notes that the Draft EIR acknowledged potential cumulative impacts in air quality emissions but fails to identify mitigation measures for such impacts. SWAPE references the Draft EIR and states, in relevant parts:
[O]perational air quality emissions for the proposed Specific Plan have the potential to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of CO, NOX, SOX, PM10, PM2.5, and ROG” (p. 2.4-15).

However, the DEIR fails to implement any mitigation intended to reduce the above-mentioned operational criteria air pollutant emissions. As such, the DEIR fails to adequately address and mitigate the Specific Plan’s cumulative air quality impacts and, as a result, should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Exhibit 1, p. 2.

CEQA specifically mandates analysis of cumulative impacts in the EIR. Public Resources Code § 21100; Guidelines § 15064(h). Guidelines § 15130(a) mandates:
10-358
(a) An EIR shall discuss cumulative impacts of a project when the project’s incremental effect is cumulatively considerable, as defined in section 15065 (a)(3). Where a lead agency is examining a project with an incremental effect that is not “cumulatively considerable,” a lead agency need not consider that effect significant, but shall briefly describe its basis for concluding that the incremental effect is not cumulatively considerable.”
It is well-established that “[t]he purpose of CEQA is not to generate paper, but to compel government at all levels to make decisions with environmental consequences in mind.” Bozung v. LAFCO (1975) 13 Cal.3d 263; Guidelines § 15003(g). CEQA has four basic purposes, which include both an affirmative duty to inform and an affirmative duty to mitigate. Guidelines § 15002(a). An EIR – which is the highest level of CEQA analysis – is not a self-serving document; it has been described as “an environmental ‘alarm bell’ whose purpose it is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached ecological points of no return.” Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay v. Bd. of Port Comm’rs. (2001) 91 Cal. App. 4th 1344, 1354 (“Berkeley Jets”); County of Inyo v. Yorty (1973) 32 Cal. App. 3d 795, 810.) Here, by failing to duly address and mitigate the acknowledged cumulative impacts of the Project, the Draft EIR failed CEQA’s affirmative and substantive duty to mitigate and violated CEQA. As stated by SWAPE, the EIR must be updated and recirculated to include mitigation measures for cumulative impacts and to conduct appropriate impacts analysis with those measures in place.

B. The EIR Failed to Adequately Analyze and Mitigate GHG Impacts.

In its letter, SWAPE notes the EIR’s failure to adequately address and mitigate GHG emissions. Specifically, SWAPE points out that EIR admits that the cumulative impacts of GHG emissions from individual projects may occur; yet, SWAPE notes that the mitigation of GHG impacts is improperly deferred and the mitigation measure for GHG emissions (MM GHG-3) is narrowly and improperly limited only to individual projects that require CEQA. Exhibit 1, p. 3.

The EIR’s failure to mitigate GHG cumulative impacts and its deferred mitigation focusing only on projects subject to CEQA review is crucial since the Project is a specific plan and will, by operation of law, exempt future individual projects from CEQA review, including under Government Code § 65457.
10-359
CEQA prohibits deferral of mitigation measures and allows deferral of formulation of specific details of mitigation only in case such formulation of measures is impractical or infeasible to include during the Project’s environmental review and in case the agency commits to such mitigation and provides specific performance standards for same.

Guidelines § 15126.4(a)(1)(B).

SWAPE references the 2017 State Official General Plan Guidelines of the Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”), where the OPR specifically prohibits deferral of mitigation of cumulative impacts in general plan amendments or adoptions to later tiered environmental documents. SWAPE also notes that the planning process of amending general plans is, by law, similar to the amendment of a specific plan (under Government Code § 65453), as here.

Based on its analysis, SWAPE concludes that the EIR improperly and inadequately defers mitigation of GHG impacts and recommends to amend the EIR to ensure that (1) GHG emissions get mitigated regardless of whether they will require CEQA review and (2) such mitigation occurs before project approval rather than prior to issuance of building permits. SWAPE states, in pertinent parts:

As demonstrated above, OPR guidance indicates that lead agencies cannot defer the analysis of any significant effects, as future projects would likely not be require d to conduct further environmental review. As such, MM GHG-3 should apply to all future projects under the proposed Specific Plan. Additionally, the evaluation of GHG impacts and the incorporation of additional mitigation measures should be conducted befor e individual project approval, not just prior to the issuance of grading or demolition permits. Until all future projects within the Specific Plan are required to conduct GHG analyses to adequately evaluate and mitigate GHG impacts, the DEIR should not be relied upon for Project significance.MM GHG - 3 should apply to all future projects under the proposed Specific Plan.

Exhibit 1, p. 3.

Accordingly, the EIR and its GHG mitigation measure, as drafted, violate CEQA in failing to mitigate and in improperly deferring mitigation measures.

The EIR, its proposed mitigation measures and the ultimate mitigation monitoring and reporting plan must be updated/drafted to include SWAPE’s recommendations, to ensure that the City complies with CEQA’s mitigation mandate as to GHG emissions 10-360
by making binding commitments to alleviate those impacts. (E.g., Napa Citizens for Honest Government v. Napa County Bd. of Supervisors (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 342, 380 [Updated Specific Plan, however, makes no binding commitment to do anything to alleviate the impact the Project will have on traffic and housing].) C. The EIR Fails to Inc lude All Feasible Mitigation Measures for GHG Emissions, Which Precludes Project Approval Under CEQA.

SWAPE found that the Draft EIR fails to incorporate all feasible mitigation, as mandated by CEQA:

According to CEQA Guidelines § 15096(g)(2): ‘When an EIR has been prepared for a project, the Responsible Agency shall not approve the project as proposed if the agency finds any feasible alternative or feasible mitigation measures within its powers that would substantially lessen or avoid any significant effect the project would have on the environment. (Exhibit 1, p. 4.)
As to GHG emissions, CEQA also requires to adequately disclose and quantify the impacts. Guidelines § 15183.5. It is not enough to conclude that impacts would be less with mitigation; the EIR must adequately analyze and calculate GHG impacts before and after mitigation and explain how it arrives at such conclusion.

Hence, to make the EIR compliant with CEQA, SWAPE recommends additional feasible mitigation measures for GHG operational impacts. Without such mitigation, the City will violate CEQA’s affirmative duty to mitigate impacts to the extent feasible and cannot legally approve the Project under CEQA. Public Resources Code § 21002.

The EIR must be updated to evaluate the impacts of GHG emissions upon implementation of those additional feasible mitigation measures recommended by SWAPE, and the ultimate mitigation monitoring and reporting program must be drafted to incorporate SWAPE’s recommended feasible mitigation measures.

II. THE DRAFT EIR VIOLATES CEQA AS IT UNDERSTATES THE
PROJECT’S TRAFFIC IMPACTS DUE TO ERRONEOUS VMT
ANALYSIS AND BASELINE ASSUMPTIONS.

Based on its April 7, 2022 expert report from traffic expert Norman L. Marshall, Smart Mobility (see, Exhibit 2 [4/7/2022 Smart Mobility Expert Report]), the Draft EIR for 10-361
the Project is inadequate and fatally flawed due to errors in the traffic analysis and related baseline assumptions.

Upon review of the Project’s Draft EIR, other related projects (e.g., Disney’s Cotino Project), and statistical data, Smart Mobility made specific findings; namely:
1) The DEIR VMT Calculations are invalid. The calculations include erroneous negative VMT for housing, and grossly inconsistent VMT between the project area and the City as a whole.
2) The City of Rancho Mirage has a large deficit of workforce housing.

There are 10,800 more service jobs in the City today than there are service workers living in the City. This deficit will get worse as Disney’s Cotino project and other developments are constructed.

Many Rancho Mirage workers commute more than 50 miles in each direction and some commute more than 100 miles.
3) More market rate housing in Rancho Mirage will greatly increase VMT. Given the affluent older population, each addition market- rate household requires approximately one additional service worker, and the additional commute VMT from that service worker must be considered in calculating the VMT impacts of the housing. 4) Constructing workforce housing in Rancho Mirage would reduce regional VMT. A valid analysis of the VMT impacts of the Highway 111 Specific Plan must draw a sharp contrast between market-rate housing and workforce housing and evaluate the VMT impacts of each separately.
5) Without enforceable commitments for a large portion of the increased residential entitlement to be workforce housing the Highway 111 Specific Plan will cause an excessive increase in VMT.

Exhibit 2, p. 1.

A. The Draft E
IR’s VMT Analysis Contains Errors and Must Be Revised.

Smart Mobility found that the Draft EIR’s VMT calculations contained an error: the VMT analysis of the Project’s area and the City in general, with the Project, showed large and unsupported negative baseline assumptions for residential growth. Specifically, Smart Mobility reported that the EIR calculated the Project’s area VMT per 10-362
population, with the Project, to be “P = -23.9 VMT per person” and for the City in general, with the Project, to be “P = -2.0 VMT per person”. (Exhibit 2, pp. 2-3.) Simply put, the Draft EIR finds that, with the increase of residential development – and hence, population growth – traffic impacts will decrease. Smart Mobility found no explanation in the Draft EIR to support this negative finding of VMTs. Hence, Smart Mobility concluded the EIR contains errors and is invalid:

It is possible that the Riverside Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM) performs poorly in this part of Riverside County. It also is possible that the DEIR consultants misapplied the model. In either case, the DEIR VMT analysis is invalid.

Exhibit 2, p. 3.

Regardless of the source of the error, the EIR must be updated and its VMT analysis revised, to correct the error or explain how the increase of population can reasonably amount to decrease in VMT. Failure to do so will render the EIR fatally flawed and violating CEQA as to its analysis and baseline assumptions.

B. The Draft E
IR’s VMT Analysis Understates Traffic VMT Impacts In
Light of the Project’s Demographics and Lack of Workforce Housing.

Based on review of the Project’s and the City’s demographics and statistical data (Exhibit 2, pp. 3-6), Smart Mobility found that the Project’s proposed increase of market-rate housing will increase VMTs, contrary to the EIR’s baseline assumptions.

In particular, Smart Mobility found:
[T]here are 15,000 jobs in Rancho Mirage but less than 5,000 workers living in Rancho Mirage. The 15,000 jobs are primarily in the service sector, with 89% in one of t he service categories including health care, accommodations and food services, retail, entertainment and recreation, and other services. However, only 55% of the workers living in Rancho Mirage are employed in those industries. There is a deficit of 10,800 service workers in Rancho Mirage today.

This includes a 3,900-worker deficit in the hospitality industry (adding together accommodations, food service, recreation, and entertainment).

Exhibit 2, pp. 4-5.

10-363
In addition, Smart Mobility found:

These statistics show a largely older population with small households and few children, and a relatively small proportion of residents in the labor force. Rancho Mirage is a very affluent community with current average house prices exceeding $1.2 million.

Exhibit 2, pp. 3.

Smart Mobility also found that the majority of hospitality and service workers have an average salary of $16,000/year, cannot afford living in the Project area or the City and are hence long-distance commuters from 50-100 miles away.

Based on its thorough review of statistical data, Smart Mobility concluded that the EIR understates VMT impacts as it fails to consider the additional VMT of service workers upon increase of residential market-rate housing:

Therefore, in evaluating the impacts of adding to the number of market - rate housing units in Rancho Mirage, we must not only add the direct VMT impacts of an added housing unit but also add in the VMT impacts of another service worker. As illustrated in Figure 3, the VMT impacts of adding these service workers is very great.

The DEIR is disingenuous when it suggests that reallocating land from commercial to residential will reduce future VMT because adding to residential growth will also cause service job growth.

Exhibit 2, p. 7.

Smart Mobility also noted the fact that other similar projects, such as Disney’s Cotino project in the City, will cumulatively add to VMTs. (Exhibit 2, p. 7.) Hence, the Draft EIR is also inadequate as it understates these cumulative VMTs of the Project along with other related projects in the City.

To cure the above-noted EIR inadequacy, Smart Mobility recommended to revise the EIR’s analysis as follows:

A valid analysis of the VMT impacts of the Highway 111 Specific Plan must draw a sharp contrast between market-rate housing and workforce housing and evaluate the VMT impacts of each separately. Unless a large proportion of any additional residential entitlement is workforce housing, there will be a large increase in VMT.
10-364
Exhibit 2, p. 8.

To comply with CEQA’s affirmative duty of good-faith disclosure and identification of impacts, the Draft EIR must be revised to include the above-noted analysis of VMT impacts per market-rate and workforce housing.

A. The Draft E IR Must Provide Feasible Mitigation Measures and Binding Commitments to Build More Workforce (or, Affordable) Housing to Mitigate the Project’s Reasonably Foreseeable Traffic Impacts.

In order to mitigate the Project’s traffic impacts in view of the City’s reallocation of more commercial land for residential development, Smart Mobility recommends to include a feasible mitigation measure: a specific binding commitment to build workforce (or, affordable) housing.

Reviewing the EIR, Smart Mobility found that its analysis is inadequate as it improperly equates or conflates density and affordability and appears to evade the affordability issue at all:

In the DEIR, the word “workforce” appears only once - noting that there is a 20% potential density bonus in the R-H/SP High Density Residential category. (DEIR, p. 36 of 900) There is no discussion of whether this bonus will be attractive enough that workforce housing will be constructed.

Similarly, the DEIR equates density and affordabil ity: “The allowance of such high maximum density demonstrates that the City can provide a substantial number of future residential units that are marketrate affordable.” (DEIR p. 205 of 900) This excerpt raises several questions.

What is a “substantial number” of units? Is it 10, 100, 1000? What is “market-rate affordable”? Is it $1 million instead of $1.2 million? How does the higher allowed density translate into actual new housing units that would be affordable to the City’s workforce?
Exhibit 2, p. 8.

10-365
To mitigate the excessive – and yet understated – VMT traffic impacts, Smart Mobility recommended specific enforceable commitments on the part of the City:

Without enforceable commitments for a large portion of the increased residential entitlement to be workforce housing the Highway 111 Specific Plan will cause an excessive increase in VMT.

Exhibit 2, p. 8.)
Thus, to comply with CEQA’s imposed duty to mitigate Project’s traffic impacts, the City must include enforceable commitments and devise incentives for project applicants to ensure that large part of the Project’s residential development will produce workforce (or, affordable) housing. Further, these incentives should not be in return for more density, since adding more density as mitigation will increase traffic impacts as well.

If the City has any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact my Office.

Sincerely,

Naira Soghbatyan
Attorneys for Southwest Regional
Council of Carpenters

Attached:

March 28, 2022 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney At Law, re “Comments on the Highway 111 Specific Plan (SCH No. 2020069010)” (Exhibit 1); and April 7, 2022 Smart Mobility Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney at Law, re “Comments on the Highway 111 Specific Plan DEIR” (Exhibit 2) 10-366

2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD
(310) 795-2335
[email protected]
March 28, 2022
Naira Soghbatyan, Esq.

Mitchell M. Tsai, Attorney at Law
155 South El Molino Avenue Suite 104
Pasadena, CA 91101
Subject: Comments o n the Highway 111 Specific Plan (SCH No. 2020069010) Dear Ms. Soghbatyan,
We have reviewed the January 2022 Draft Environmental Impact Report (“DEIR”) for the Highway 111 Specific Plan (“Specific Plan”) located in the City of Rancho Mirage (“City”). The Specific Plan proposes to include a total of 1,504 residential units and 5,351,868-square feet (“SF”) of commercial space on the 684-acre site.

Our review concludes that the DEIR fails to adequately evaluate the Specific Plan’s air quality and greenhouse gas impacts. As a result, emissions associated with construction and operation of the proposed Specific Plan are inadequately addressed. An updated EIR should be prepared to adequately assess and mitigate the potential air quality and greenhouse gas impacts that buildout of the Specific Plan may have on the surrounding environment.

Air Quality & Greenhouse Gases
Inadequate Mitigation of Potentially Significant Operational Air Quality Impacts According to California Government Code 65453:
“A specific plan shall be prepared, adopted, and amended in the same manner as a general plan.”1
1 “ARTICLE 8. Specific Plans [65450 - 65457].” California Public Resources Code, 1985, available at:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?lawCode=GOV&sectionNum=65453.#:~:text=( a)%20A%20specific%20plan%20shall,necessary%20by%20the%20legislative%20body. 10-367
As demo
nstrated above, specific plans are to be prepared in the same manner as general plans. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (“OPR”) published the State of California 2017 General Plan Guidelines, which assists local governments in preparing general plans.2 Regarding cumulative impacts, OPR guidance states:
“The EIR must analyze the cumulative effects of the plan’s land use designations, policies and programs on the environment.”3
Furthermore, OPR guidance states:
“The EIR must identify mitigation measures and alternatives to avoid or minimize potential impacts, to the extent feasible. The general plan EIR is a particularly useful tool for identifying measures to mitigate the cumulative effects of new development.”4 As demonstrated above, general plans, and consequently specific plans, are required to incorporate mitigation measures to reduce cumulative impacts. Thus, as the DEIR indicates that the Specific Plan’s operational air quality emissions have potentially significant cumulative impacts, mitigation measures should have been incorporated to reduce such impacts. Specifically, the DEIR states:
“[O]perational air quality emissions for the proposed Specific Plan have the potential to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of CO, NOX, SOX, PM10, PM2.5, and ROG” (p. 2.4-15).

However, the DEIR fails to implement any mitigation intended to reduce the above-mentioned operational criteria air pollutant emissions. As such, the DEIR fails to adequately address and mitigate the Specific Plan’s cumulative air quality impacts and, as a result, should not be relied upon to determine Project significance.

Inadequate Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas Impacts
Regarding the Specific Plan’s greenhouse gas (“GHG”) impacts, the DEIR states:
“[I]ndividual projects developed under the proposed Specific Plan will be assessed on a case-by- case basis for potential impacts related to GHG emissions. While implementation of existing General Plan policies and programs and proposed Specific Plan policies and guidelines will help reduce GHG emissions, based on the GHG projections above, it is possible that the proposed Specific Plan would generate GHG emissions that could have a significant and unavoidable impact on the environment” (p. 2.4-20).

As demonstrated above, the Specific Plan concludes that “individual projects developed under the proposed Specific Plan will be assessed on a case-by-case basis for potential impacts related to GHG 2 “State of California 2017 General Plan Guidelines.” Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, 2017, available at: https://opr.ca.gov/docs/OPR_COMPLETE_7.31.17.pdf.
3 “State of California 2017 General Plan Guidelines.” Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, 2017, available at: https://opr.ca.gov/docs/OPR_COMPLETE_7.31.17.pdf, p. 271. 4 “State of California 2017 General Plan Guidelines.” Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, 2017, available at: https://opr.ca.gov/docs/OPR_COMPLETE_7.31.17.pdf, p. 271. 10-368
emissi
ons” (p. 2.4-20). As such, the Specific Plan incorporates Mitigation Measure (“MM”) GHG-3, which states:
“GHG-3 CEQA Analysis: Sustainability Plan Measures
Projects that require CEQA analysis shall be required to conduct detailed impact analyses and incorporate mitigation measures into their designs using the City’s current Sustainability Plan prescribed reduction measures for achieving greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. All proposed mitigation measures shall be reviewed and approved by the City prior to the issuance of grading or demolition permits” (p. ES-8).

Thus, future projects that “require CEQA analysis” would conduct further GHG analyses and incorporate Project-specific mitigation measures. However, this is insufficient, as projects that are exempt from CEQA analysis would not be required to adhere to this mitigation measure. According to the above- mentioned State of California 2017 General Plan Guidelines:
“The general plan EIR need not be as detailed as an EIR for the specific projects that will follow (CEQA Guidelines § 15146). Its level of detail should reflect the level contained in the plan or plan element being considered (Rio Vista Farm Bureau Center v. County of Solano (1992) 5 Cal.App.4th 351). However, the lead agency cannot defer its analysis of any significant effect of the general plan to later-tiered EIRs (Stanislaus Natural Heritage Project v. County of Stanislaus (1996) 48 Cal.App.4th 182). “With a good and detailed analysis of the [general plan], many subsequent activities could be found to be within the scope of the project described in the [general plan] EIR, and no further environmental documents would be required.” (CEQA Guidelines § 15168(c) (5); see also id. at § 15183.3 (streamlining for infill projects))” (emphasis added).
5 As demonstrated above, OPR guidance indicates that lead agencies cannot defer the analysis of any significant effects, as future projects would likely not be required to conduct further environmental review. As such, MM GHG-3 should apply to all future projects under the proposed Specific Plan.

Additionally, the evaluation of GHG impacts and the incorporation of additional mitigation measures should be conducted before individual project approval, not just prior to the issuance of grading or demolition permits. Until all future projects within the Specific Plan are required to conduct GHG analyses to adequately evaluate and mitigate GHG impacts, the DEIR should not be relied upon for Project significance.

Failure to Implement All Feasible Mitigation to Reduce Emissions The DEIR determines that the Specific Plan’s operational GHG emissions would be significant-and- unavoidable. Specifically, the DEIR states:
5 “State of California 2017 General Plan Guidelines.” Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, 2017, available at: https://opr.ca.gov/docs/OPR_COMPLETE_7.31.17.pdf, p. 271. 10-369
“[T]he per
capita emission rate for the proposed Specific Plan is 12.1 MTCO2e in 2040, which exceeds the statewide recommended targets (6 MTCO2e for 2030 and 2 MTCO2e for 2050) for AB 32 compliance. It is possible and expected that per capita emissions will decrease over the next 20 years due to future technology improvements, increased use of alternative modes of transportation, improved building efficiency, and increased use of renewable energy sources.

However, the elective use of alternative modes of transportation and future efficiency potentials cannot be confidently quantified and applied as a mitigation measure. Therefore, operational impacts as they currently stand are not in compliance with AB 32, and impacts will be significant and unavoidable” (p. 2.4-19).

However, while we agree that the Specific Plan’s GHG emissions would result in a significant GHG impact, the DEIR’s conclusion that these impacts are “significant and unavoidable” is incorrect.

According to CEQA Guidelines § 15096(g)(2):
“When an EIR has been prepared for a project, the Responsible Agency shall not approve the project as proposed if the agency finds any feasible alternative or feasible mitigation measures within its powers that would substantially lessen or avoid any significant effect the project would have on the environment.”
As demonstrated above, an impact can only be labeled as significant and unavoidable after all available, feasible mitigation is considered. Here, while the DEIR includes MM GHG-1 through GHG-2, the DEIR fails to implement all feasible mitigation (p. 2.4-21). Thus, the DEIR’s conclusion that the Specific Plan’s operational GHG impacts are significant-and-unavoidable is unsubstantiated. To reduce GHG impacts to the maximum extent possible, additional feasible mitigation measures should be incorporated, such as those suggested in the following section of this letter. The Specific Plan should not be approved until an updated EIR is prepared, incorporating all feasible mitigation to reduce operational emissions to less- than-significant levels.

Feasible Mitigation Measures Available to Reduce Emissions Our analysis demonstrates that the Specific Plan results in potentially significant air quality and GHG impacts that should be mitigated further. As such, in an effort to reduce emissions, we identified several mitigation measures that are applicable to the proposed Specific Plan. Therefore, to reduce emissions, we recommend consideration of SCAG’s 2020 RTP/SCS PEIR’s Air Quality Project Level Mitigation Measures (“PMM-AQ-1”) and Greenhouse Gas Project Level Mitigation Measures (“PMM-GHG-1”), as described below: 6

6 “4.0 Mitigation Measures.” Connect SoCal Program Environmental Impact Report Addendum #1, September 2020, available at: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file- attachments/fpeir_connectsocal_addendum_4_mitigationmeasures.pdf?1606004420, p. 4.0-2 – 4.0-10; 4.0-1 9 –

4.0-23; See also: “Certified Final Connect SoCal Program Environmental Impact Report.” Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), May 2020, available at: https://scag.ca.gov/peir. 10-370
SCAG RTP/SCS 2020-2045
Air Quality Project Level Mitigation Measures – PMM-AQ-1:

In accordance with provisions of sections 15091(a)(2) and 15126.4(a)(1)(B) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Lead Agency for a project can and should consider mitigation measures to reduce substantial adverse effects related to violating air quality standards. Such measures may include the following or other comparable measures identified by the Lead Agency:
m) Provide an operational water truck on-site at all times. Use watering trucks to minimize dust; watering should be sufficient to confine dust plumes to the project work areas. Sweep paved streets at least once per day where there is evidence of dirt that has been carried on to the roadway. n) Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean fuel generators rather than temporary power generators.
o) Develop a traffic plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities. The plan may include advance public notice of routing, use of public transportation, and satellite parking areas with a shuttle service.

Schedule operations affecting traffic for off-peak hours. Minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes. Provide a flag person to guide traffic properly and ensure safety at construction sites. p) As appropriate require that portable engines and portable engine-driven equipment units used at the project work site, with the exception of on-road and off-road motor vehicles, obtain CARB Portable Equipment Registration with the state or a local district permit. Arrange appropriate consultations with the CARB or the District to determine registration and permitting requirements prior to equipment operation at the site. q) Require projects within 500 feet of residences, hospitals, or schools to use Tier 4 equipment for all engines above 50 horsepower (hp) unless the individual project can demonstrate that Tier 4 engines would not be required to mitigate emissions below significance thresholds. r) Projects located within the South Coast Air Basin should consider applying for South Coast AQMD “SOON” funds which provides funds to applicable fleets for the purchase of commercially available low-emission heavy- duty engines to achieve near-term reduction of NOx emissions from in-use off-road diesel vehicles. s) Projects located within AB 617 communities should review the applicable Community Emissions Reduction Plan (CERP) for additional mitigation that can be applied to individual projects. t) Where applicable, projects should provide information about air quality related programs to schools, including the Environmental Justice Community Partnerships (EJCP), Clean Air Ranger Education (CARE), and Why Air Quality Matters programs.
y) Projects that will introduce sensitive receptors within 500 feet of freeways and other sources should consider installing high efficiency of enhanced filtration units, such as Minimum Efficiency Reporting Value (MERV) 13 or better. Installation of enhanced filtration units can be verified during occupancy inspection prior to the issuance of an occupancy permit.
z) Develop an ongoing monitoring, inspection, and maintenance program for the MERV filters. aa) Consult the SCAG Environmental Justice Toolbox for potential measures to address impacts to low-income and/or minority communities.
bb) The following criteria related to diesel emissions shall be implemented on by individual project sponsors as appropriate and feasible:
- Diesel nonroad vehicles on site for more than 10 total days shall have either (1) engines that meet EPA on road emissions standards or (2) emission control technology verified by EPA or CARB to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85%
- Diesel generators on site for more than 10 total days shall be equipped with emission control technology verified by EPA or CARB to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85%. - Nonroad diesel engines on site shall be Tier 2 or higher. - Diesel nonroad construction equipment on site for more than 10 total days shall have either (1) engines meeting EPA Tier 4 nonroad emissions standards or (2) emission control technology verified by EPA or 10-371
CARB for use with nonroad engines to reduce PM emissions by a minimum of 85% for engines for 50 hp and greater and by a minimum of 20% for engines less than 50 hp. - Emission control technology shall be operated, maintained, and serviced as recommended by the emission control technology manufacturer.
- Diesel vehicles, construction equipment, and generators on site shall be fueled with ultra-low sulfur diesel fuel (ULSD) or a biodiesel blend approved by the original engine manufacturer with sulfur content of 15 ppm or less.
- The construction contractor shall maintain a list of all diesel vehicles, construction equipment, and generators to be used on site. The list shall include the following:
i. Contractor and subcontractor name and address, plus contact person responsible for the vehicles or equipment.
ii. Equipment type, equipment manufacturer, equipment serial number, engine manufacturer, engine model year, engine certification (Tier rating), horsepower, engine serial number, and expected fuel usage and hours of operation.
iii. For the emission control technology installed: technology type, serial number, make, model, manufacturer, EPA/CARB verification number/level, and installation date and hour-meter reading on installation date.
- The contractor shall establish generator sites and truck-staging zones for vehicles waiting to load or unload material on site. Such zones shall be located where diesel emissions have the least impact on abutters, the general public, and especially sensitive receptors such as hospitals, schools, daycare facilities, elderly housing, and convalescent facilities. - The contractor shall maintain a monthly report that, for each on road diesel vehicle, nonroad construction equipment, or generator onsite, includes:
i. Hour-meter readings on arrival on-site, the first and last day of every month, and on off-site date.
ii. Any problems with the equipment or emission controls. iii. Certified copies of fuel deliveries for the time period that identify:

1. Source of supply

2. Quantity of fuel

3. Quantity of fuel, including sulfur content (percent by weight) cc) Project should exceed Title-24 Building Envelope Energy Efficiency Standards (California Building Standards Code). The following measures can be used to increase energy efficiency:
- Provide pedestrian network improvements, such as interconnected street network, narrower roadways and shorter block lengths, sidewalks, accessibility to transit and transit shelters, traffic calming measures, parks and public spaces, minimize pedestrian barriers. - Provide traffic calming measures, such as:
i. Marked crosswalks
ii. Count-down signal timers
iii. Curb extensions iv. Speed tables
iv. Raised crosswalks
v. Raised intersections
vi. Median islands
vii. Tight corner radii
viii. Roundabouts or mini-circles
ix. On-street parking
x. Chicanes/chokers
- Create urban non-motorized zones
- Provide bike parking in non-residential and multi-unit residential projects - Dedicate land for bike trails
- Limit parking supply through:
i. Elimination (or reduction) of minimum parking requirements ii. Creation of maximum parking requirements
iii. Provision of shared parking
10-372
- Require residential area parking permit.
- Provide ride-sharing programs
i. Designate a certain percentage of parking spacing for ride sharing vehicles ii. Designating adequate passenger loading and unloading and waiting areas for ride-sharing vehicles
iii. Providing a web site or messaging board for coordinating rides iv. Permanent transportation management association membership and finding requirement.

Greenhouse Gas Project Level Mitigation Measures – PMM-GHG-1 In accordance with provisions of sections 15091(a)(2) and 15126.4(a)(1)(B) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Lead Agency for a project can and should consider mitigation measures to reduce substantial adverse effects related to violating air quality standards. Such measures may include the following or other comparable measures identified by the Lead Agency:
b) Reduce emissions resulting from projects through implementation of project features, project design, or other measures, such as those described in Appendix F of the State CEQA Guidelines. c) Include off-site measures to mitigate a project’s emissions. d) Measures that consider incorporation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) during design, construction and operation of projects to minimize GHG emissions, including but not limited to:
i. Use energy and fuel-efficient vehicles and equipment; ii. Deployment of zero- and/or near zero emission technologies; iii. Use lighting systems that are energy efficient, such as LED technology; iv. Use the minimum feasible amount of GHG-emitting construction materials; v. Use cement blended with the maximum feasible amount of flash or other materials that reduce GHG emissions from cement production;
vi. Incorporate design measures to reduce GHG emissions from solid waste management through encouraging solid waste recycling and reuse;
vii. Incorporate design measures to reduce energy consumption and increase use of renewable energy;
viii. Incorporate design measures to reduce water consumption; ix. Use lighter-colored pavement where feasible;
x. Recycle construction debris to maximum extent feasible; xi. Plant shade trees in or near construction projects where feasible; and xii. Solicit bids that include concepts listed above.
e) Measures that encourage transit use, carpooling, bike-share and car-share programs, active transportation, and parking strategies, including, but not limited to the following:
i. Promote transit-active transportation coordinated strategies; ii. Increase bicycle carrying capacity on transit and rail vehicles; iii. Improve or increase access to transit;
iv. Increase access to common goods and services, such as groceries, schools, and day care; v. Incorporate affordable housing into the project;
vi. Incorporate the neighborhood electric vehicle network; vii. Orient the project toward transit, bicycle and pedestrian facilities; viii. Improve pedestrian or bicycle networks, or transit service; ix. Provide traffic calming measures;
x. Provide bicycle parking;
xi. Limit or eliminate park supply;
10-373
xii. Unbundle parking costs;
xiii. Provide parking cash-out programs;
xiv. Implement or provide access to commute reduction program; f) Incorporate bicycle and pedestrian facilities into project designs, maintaining these facilities, and providing amenities incentivizing their use; and planning for and building local bicycle projects that connect with the regional network;
g) Improving transit access to rail and bus routes by incentives for construction and transit facilities within developments, and/or providing dedicated shuttle service to transit stations; and h) Adopting employer trip reduction measures to reduce employee trips such as vanpool and carpool programs, providing end-of-trip facilities, and telecommuting programs including but not limited to measures that:
i. Provide car-sharing, bike sharing, and ride-sharing programs; ii. Provide transit passes;
iii. Shift single occupancy vehicle trips to carpooling or vanpooling, for example providing ride- matching services;
iv. Provide incentives or subsidies that increase that use of modes other than single-occupancy vehicle;
v. Provide on-site amenities at places of work, such as priority parking for carpools and vanpools, secure bike parking, and showers and locker rooms;
vi. Provide employee transportation coordinators at employment sites; vii. Provide a guaranteed ride home service to users of non-auto modes. i) Designate a percentage of parking spaces for ride-sharing vehicles or high-occupancy vehicles, and provide adequate passenger loading and unloading for those vehicles; j) Land use siting and design measures that reduce GHG emissions, including:
i. Developing on infill and brownfields sites;
ii. Building compact and mixed-use developments near transit; iii. Retaining on-site mature trees and vegetation, and planting new canopy trees; iv. Measures that increase vehicle efficiency, encourage use of zero and low emissions vehicles, or reduce the carbon content of fuels, including constructing or encouraging construction of electric vehicle charging stations or neighborhood electric vehicle networks, or charging for electric bicycles; and
v. Measures to reduce GHG emissions from solid waste management through encouraging solid waste recycling and reuse.
k) Consult the SCAG Environmental Justice Toolbox for potential measures to address impacts to low-income and/or minority communities. The measures provided above are also intended to be applied in low income and minority communities as applicable and feasible.
l) Require at least five percent of all vehicle parking spaces include electric vehicle charging stations, or at a minimum, require the appropriate infrastructure to facilitate sufficient electric charging for passenger vehicles and trucks to plug-in.
m) Encourage telecommuting and alternative work schedules, such as:
i. Staggered starting times
ii. Flexible schedules
iii. Compressed work weeks
n) Implement commute trip reduction marketing, such as:
i. New employee orientation of trip reduction and alternative mode options ii. Event promotions
iii. Publications
o) Implement preferential parking permit program
10-374
p) Implement school pool and bus programs
q) Price workplace parking, such as:
i. Explicitly charging for parking for its employees;
ii. Implementing above market rate pricing;
iii. Validating parking only for invited guests;
iv. Not providing employee parking and transportation allowances; and v. Educating employees about available alternatives.

These measures offer a cost-effective, feasible way to incorporate lower-emitting design features into the proposed Specific Plan, which subsequently, reduce emissions released during construction and operation. An updated EIR should be prepared to include all feasible mitigation measures, as well as include updated air quality and GHG analyses to ensure that the necessary mitigation measures are implemented to reduce emissions to below thresholds. The updated EIR should also demonstrate a commitment to the implementation of these measures prior to the approval of the Specific Plan, to ensure that the Project’s significant emissions are reduced to the maximum extent possible.

Disclaimer
SWAPE has received limited discovery regarding this project. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties.

Sincerely,

Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg.

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

10-375
Attac
hment A: Matt Hagemann CV
Attachment B: Paul E. Rosenfeld CV
10-376
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, CA 90405
Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg.
(949) 887-9013
[email protected]
Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP
Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization
Investigation and Remediation Strategies
Litigation Support and Testifying Expert
Industrial Stormwater Compliance
CEQA Review
Education:

M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984.

B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982.

Professional Certifications:

California Professional Geologist
California Certified Hydrogeologist
Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner
Professional Experience:

Matt has 30 years of experience in environmental policy, contaminant assessment and remediation, stormwater compliance, and CEQA review. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA’s Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and directed efforts to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. For the past 15 years, as a founding partner with SWAPE, Matt has developed extensive client relationships and has managed complex projects that include consultation as an expert witness and a regulatory specialist, and a manager of projects ranging from industrial stormwater compliance to CEQA review of impacts from hazardous waste, air quality and greenhouse gas emissions.

Positions Matt has held include:
• Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 – present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 – 2104, 2017; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 ‐‐ 2003); Attachment A
10-377
• Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001 – 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989– 1998);
• Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 – 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 – 1998);
• Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990 – 1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986 – 1998); and
• Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984 – 1986).

Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst:

With SWAPE, Matt’s responsibilities have included:
• Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 300 environmental impact reports and negative declarations since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever.
• Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at more than 100 industrial facilities.
• Expert witness on numerous cases including, for example, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) contamination of groundwater, MTBE litigation, air toxins at hazards at a school, CERCLA compliance in assessment and remediation, and industrial stormwater contamination. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells.
• Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California.

With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt’s duties included the following:
• Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation.
• Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York.
10-378
• Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production‐related contamination in Mississippi. • Lead author for a multi‐volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators.

Executive Director:

As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council.

Hydrogeology:

As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows:
• Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater.
• Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases.
• Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum.

At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui.

As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following:
• Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water.
• Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted 10-379
public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation.
• Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer.

Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows:
• Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements.
• Reviewed and wrote ʺpart Bʺ permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S.

EPA legal counsel.
• Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor’s investigations of waste sites.

With the National Park Service, Matt directed service‐wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks:
• Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed‐scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park.
• Identified high‐levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup.
• Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup.
• Co‐authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation‐ wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi‐Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan.

Policy:

Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9.

Activities included the following:
• Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies.
• Shaped EPA’s national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs.
• Improved the technical training of EPAʹs scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region’s 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific 10-380
principles into the policy‐making process.
• Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents.

Geology:

With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows:
• Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability.
• Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection.
• Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon.

As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following:
• Supervised year‐long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. • Conducted aquifer tests.
• Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal.

Teaching:

From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels:
• At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination.
• Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. • Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin.

Matt is currently a part time geology instructor at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California where he taught from 2010 to 2014 and in 2017.

Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations:

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon.

Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S.

EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California.

Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee).
10-381

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles.

Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells.

Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee).

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter‐Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant.

Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee.

Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association.

Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers.

10-382
Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water.

Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report.

Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report.

Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina.

Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City.

Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996.

Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP‐61.

Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Ch ar ac te r i z a t i o n and Cl ean up a t Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting.

Hagemann, M. F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater.

Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL‐ contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 10-383
Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35.

Other Experience:

Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examinations, 2009‐2011.
10-384

SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE
2656 29th Street, Suite 201
Santa Monica, California 90405
Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D.

Mobil: (310) 795-2335
Office: (310) 452-5555
Fax: (310) 452-5550
Email: [email protected]
Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 October 2021
Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Principal Environmental Chemist Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Education
Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration.

M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics.

B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment.

Professional Experience
Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years’ experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr.

Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, industrial, military and agricultural sources, unconventional oil drilling operations, and locomotive and construction engines. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has also successfully modeled exposure to contaminants distributed by water systems and via vapor intrusion.

Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, creosote, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at sites and has testified as an expert witness on numerous cases involving exposure to soil, water and air contaminants from industrial, railroad, agricultural, and military sources.

Attachment B
10-385

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 October 2021

Professional History:

Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer
San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 – 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 – 1999; Scientist
James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist
Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist

Publications:

Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48

Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342

Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science , 8(6), 622-632.

Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL.

Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113–125.

Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327.

10-386

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 October 2021

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255.

Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530.

Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197.

Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357.

Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344.

Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178.

Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor-Quality-Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation’s Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178.

Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS–6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668.

Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor.

Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262.

10-387

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 October 2021

Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. ( 1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2).

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1).

Rosenfeld, P. E. ( 1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California.

Presentations:

Rosenfeld, P.E., "The science for Perfluorinated Chemicals (PFAS): What makes remediation so hard?" Law Seminars International, (May 9-10, 2018) 800 Fifth Avenue, Suite 101 Seattle, WA.

Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA.

Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water .

Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom-Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA.

Rosenfeld, P.E . (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting , Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States” Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting . Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ.

Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P . (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium-Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant . The 23 rd Annual International 10-388

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 October 2021

Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water . Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 23rd Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water . Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting . Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 – 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants – DIOXIN2006 . Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway.

Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility . APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

Mealey’s C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference . Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey’s Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals.

International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants . Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference .

Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D . (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust .

Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona.

10-389

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 October 2021

Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River.

Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners.

Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association . Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California.

Rosenfeld, P. E ., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants .. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California.

Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D . (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E . and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor.

Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association . Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain.

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association . Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington..

Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High-Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conferenc e. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland.

Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Rosenfeld. P.E. ( October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California.

Rosenfeld, P.E. ( 2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California.

Rosenfeld, P.E ., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings . Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah.

Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington.

10-390

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 October 2021

Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High-Carbon Wood-Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington.

Rosenfeld, P.E. , C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America . Lecture conducted from Anaheim California.

Teaching Experience:

UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants.

National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks.

National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites.

California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design.

UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation.

University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability.

U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10.

Academic Grants Awarded:

California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment.

Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001.

Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University.

Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000.

King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998.

Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997.

James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round-up. 1996.

10-391

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 October 2021

United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995.

Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993

Deposition and/or Trial Testimony:

In the Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-14-2021
Trial, October 8-4-2021

In the Circuit Court of Cook County Illinois
Joseph Rafferty, Plaintiff vs. Consolidated Rail Corporation and National Railroad Passenger Corporation d/b/a AMTRAK,
Case No.: No. 18-L-6845
Rosenfeld Deposition, 6-28-2021

In the United States District Court For the Northern District of Illinois Theresa Romcoe, Plaintiff vs. Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation d/b/a METRA Rail, Defendants
Case No.: No. 17-cv-8517
Rosenfeld Deposition, 5-25-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of Arizona In and For the Cunty of Maricopa Mary Tryon et al., Plaintiff vs. The City of Pheonix v. Cox Cactus Farm, L.L.C., Utah Shelter Systems, Inc.

Case Number CV20127-094749
Rosenfeld Deposition: 5-7-2021

In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Beaumont Division Robinson, Jeremy et al Plaintiffs, vs. CNA Insurance Company et al.

Case Number 1:17-cv-000508
Rosenfeld Deposition: 3-25-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Bernardino Gary Garner, Personal Representative for the Estate of Melvin Garner vs. BNSF Railway Company.

Case No. 1720288
Rosenfeld Deposition 2-23-2021

In the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Los Angeles, Spring Street Courthouse Benny M Rodriguez vs. Union Pacific Railroad, A Corporation, et al.

Case No. 18STCV01162
Rosenfeld Deposition 12-23-2020

In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri
Karen Cornwell, Plaintiff, vs. Marathon Petroleum, LP, Defendant.

Case No.: 1716-CV10006
Rosenfeld Deposition. 8-30-2019

In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM
Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019
10-392

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 October 2021

In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS “Conti Perdido” Defendant.

Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636
Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles – Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857
Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19

In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case No.: 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ
Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018

In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112 th Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No.: 1923
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017

In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C12-01481
Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017

In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 0i9-L-2295
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017

In United States District Court For The Southern District of Mississippi Guy Manuel vs. The BP Exploration et al., Defendants
Case: No 1:19-cv-00315-RHW
Rosenfeld Deposition, 4-22-2020

In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warrn Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154)
Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018

In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017

10-393

Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 October 2021

In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5
Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017
Trial, March 2017

In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115
Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015

In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County
Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187
Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015

In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia
Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al.

Civil Action N0. 14-C-30000
Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015

In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County
Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980
Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015

In the Circuit Court of the 17 th Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant.

Case Number CACE07030358 (26)
Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014

In the County Court of Dallas County Texas
Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant.

Case Number cc-11-01650-E
Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013
Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014

In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio
John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012

In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama, Northern Division James K. Benefield, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. International Paper Company, Defendant.

Civil Action Number 2:09-cv-232-WHA-TFM
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2010, June 2011

In the Circuit Court of Jefferson County Alabama
Jaeanette Moss Anthony, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Drummond Company Inc., et al., Defendants Civil Action No. CV 2008-2076
Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2010

In the United States District Court, Western District Lafayette Division Ackle et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Citgo Petroleum Corporation, et al., Defendants.

Case Number 2:07CV1052
Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2009
10-394
1 794 Sawnee Bean Road
Thetford Center VT 05075

Norman Marshall, President
(802) 356-2969
[email protected]
April 7, 2022

Mitchell M. Tsai
139 South Hudson Avenue Suite 200
Pasadena, CA 91101

Subject: Comments on the Highway 111 Specific Plan DEIR Dear Mr. Tsai
I have reviewed vehicle miles traveled (VMT) impacts in the Draft Environmental Impact Report dated January 2022 (“DEIR”). I make the following findings:
1) The DEIR VMT Calculations are invalid. The calculations include erroneous negative VMT for housing, and grossly inconsistent VMT between the project area and the City as a whole. 2) The City of Rancho Mirage has a large deficit of workforce housing. There are 10,800 more service jobs in the City today than there are service workers living in the City. This deficit will get worse as Disney’s Cotino project and other developments are constructed. Many Rancho Mirage workers commute more than 50 miles in each direction and some commute more than 100 miles.
3) More market rate housing in Rancho Mirage will greatly increase VMT. Given the affluent older population, each addition market-rate household requires approximately one additional service worker, and the additional commute VMT from that service worker must be considered in calculating the VMT impacts of the housing.
4) Constructing workforce housing in Rancho Mirage would reduce regional VMT. A valid analysis of the VMT impacts of the Highway 111 Specific Plan must draw a sharp contrast between market-rate housing and workforce housing and evaluate the VMT impacts of each separately. 5) Without enforceable commitments for a large portion of the increased residential entitlement to be workforce housing the Highway 111 Specific Plan will cause an excessive increase in VMT. 10-395
2 The DEIR VMT Calculations are Invalid
The calculations include erroneous negative VMT for housing, and grossly inconsistent VMT between the project area and the City as a whole.

The DEIR asserts that the Project will result in less future VMT than the No Project alternative. It states:

Per the VMT Analysis, the currently adopted land use table (2017 General Plan) will generate approximately 1,275,319 daily VMT and 465,491,435 annual VMT, and the proposed 2040 land use table will generate approximately 1,121,638 daily VMT and 409,397,870 annual VMT. (DEIR p. 2-4-12)
These numbers are documented in the DEIR table reproduced below. (DEIR, p. 896 of 900)

These numbers can be restated in the two of two equations where “P” represents population and “E” represents employment:

Without Project 8,044 x P + 11,388 x E = 1,275,319 VMT With Project: 10,199 x P + 10,596 x E = 1,121,638
This restatement includes two equations and two unknowns, and the values of P and E can be solved for using standard high school algebra.

P = -23.9 VMT per person
E = 128.9 VMT per person
The values in the DEIR table reproduced above imply that adding a person reduces VMT by 23.9 and adding an employee adds 128.9 VMT. The large negative value for population is so unrealistic that it must be an error. Even if there is an extreme jobs-housing imbalance and that adding workforce housing will substitute for workers commuting extremely long distances, adding population would still increase VMT because the majority of household VMT is for non- work trips. I examine the jobs/housing balance question in a later section of this letter.

A DEIR table on the next page extends the geographic analysis to include all of Rancho Mirage City. (DEIR, p. 897 of 900)
10-396
3 Somehow, the VMT totals in Table 4 for the entire City are lower than the VMT totals for the project area only in Table 3. The VMT per Service Population numbers are less than a quarter as high. These differences are a sign of serious errors in the VMT estimates.

Solving again for P and E using the numbers in Table 4.

P = -2.0 VMT per person
E = 31.2 VMT per person
The negative number for population again appears to be an error.

It is possible that the Riverside Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM) performs poorly in this part of Riverside County. It also is possible that the DEIR consultants misapplied the model. In either case, the DEIR VMT analysis is invalid.

The Rancho Mirage Has a Large Deficit of Workforce Housing Current Rancho Mirage demographic facts from the U.S. Census Bureau1 include:
• Population in 2020: 16,999
• Persons 65 years and over: 50.4%
• Persons under 18 years, percent 7.7%
• Households: 9,637
• Persons per household: 1.91
• In civilian labor force, total, percent of population:41.5% These statistics show a largely older population with small households and few children, and a relatively small proportion of residents in the labor force.

Rancho Mirage is a very affluent community with current average house prices exceeding $1.2 million.2

1 https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/ranchomiragecitycalifornia,lahabraheightscitycalifornia,chowchillac itycalifornia/AGE135219
2 Kevin Stanley Realtor, March 8, 2022. https://kevinstanley.net/greater-palm-springs-real-estate-housing-report. 10-397
4 The combination of an older affluent population and extraordinarily high housing prices have created a huge deficit in workforce housing.3
The U.S. Census Bureau publishes Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (LEHD) Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) data that provide detailed geographic data about workers, jobs, and commutes. Figure 1 compares the data for jobs in Rancho Mirage and workers living in Rancho Mirage.

Figure 1: Rancho Mirage Jobs vs. Workers Living in Rancho Mirage

As shown in Figure 1, there are 15,000 jobs in Rancho Mirage but less than 5,000 workers living in Rancho Mirage. The 15,000 jobs are primarily in the service sector, with 89% in one of the service categories including health care, accommodations and food services, retail, entertainment and recreation, and other services. However, only 55% of the workers living in Rancho Mirage are employed in those industries. There is a deficit of 10,800 service workers in Rancho Mirage today.

3 Ingrassia, Jake, KESQ. Affordable housing crisis amplifies as more luxury developments come to the valley, March 15, 2022. https://kesq.com/news/2022/03/15/affordable-housing-crisis-amplifies-as-more-luxury-developments- come-to-the-valley/
0 2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
work residence
all other
other services
arts, entertainment and
recreation
retail
accomodations and food
services
health care
10-398
5 This includes a 3,900-worker deficit in the hospitality industry (adding together accommodations, food service, recreation, and entertainment).

The Coachella Valley Economic Partnership has summarized income data showing that the average income per hospitality worker is less than $16,000 per year (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Average Income Per Coachella Valley Worker by Major Industry Sectors4

Obviously, these hospitality workers earning less than $16,000 per year are not able to buy $1.2 million houses. Instead, they end up making long commuters and generating excessive VMT. Residential locations of those working in Rancho Mirage are mapped in Figure 3.

4 Coachella Valley Economic Partnership. Average income for workers in the Coachella valley, https://cvep.com/average-income-for-workers-in-the-coachella- valley/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=average -income-for-workers-in-the-coachella-valley# 10-399
6 Figure 3: Residential Locations of Those Rancho Mirage Workforce (LODES data) – Each red dot represents one commuter, City of Rancho Mirage shown in blue

As shown in Figure 3, Rancho Mirage workers commute long distances from all other southern California. Many of these commutes are longer than 50 miles and some are longer than 100 miles.

10-400
7 More Market Rate Housing in Rancho Mirage Will Greatly Increase VMT The DEIR VMT analysis pretends that future employment in Rancho Mirage will build out to whatever level is allowed by land use regulations. In reality, Rancho Mirage has a service economy and jobs will be added in proportion to the growth in housing, hotels and resorts. The proposed reallocation of land away from commercial to residential is an indication that the market doesn’t require all of the land that is currently allocated to commercial use.

As discussed above, the City of Rancho Mirage has less than 10,000 households but over 13,000 service workers. Some of these service workers work at hotels and resorts, but most are providing services to the Rancho Mirage population. Therefore, it appears that with the older affluent population of Rancho Mirage, it takes about one service worker, on average, to serve one household.

Therefore, in evaluating the impacts of adding to the number of market-rate housing units in Rancho Mirage, we must not only add the direct VMT impacts of an added housing unit but also add in the VMT impacts of another service worker. As illustrated in Figure 3, the VMT impacts of adding these service workers is very great.

The DEIR is disingenuous when it suggests that reallocating land from commercial to residential will reduce future VMT because adding to residential growth will also cause service job growth.

This workforce housing problem is growing even worse. In a recent report:

The national spotlight fell on the Coachella Valley in February when Disney announced its new residential-living business would debut its first master planned community here in Rancho Mirage.

Cotino is slated to be the first development of its kind from Storyliving, Disney’s new venture into the housing business. The proposal includes 1,700 homes, a 400-room hotel, and shopping and dining spots centered around a 24-acre lagoon meant to mimic a beachfront oasis in the desert. The city of Rancho Mirage—long associated with high- end resort living—called it “one of the most significant master-planned projects in Rancho Mirage history.”5
The Cotino project alone likely will require at least 2,000 additional service workers, with few, if any living in the planned development, and also few living in Rancho Mirage unless a large amount of workforce housing is constructed.

5 Daniels, Melissa. Civic Solutions: As Resort Life Proliferates, What About Affordable Housing? Civic Independent, March 8, 2022. https://cvindependent.com/2022/03/civic-solutions-as-resort-life-proliferates-what-about- affordable-housing/
10-401
8 Workforce Housing in Rancho Mirage Would Reduce Regional VMT Workforce housing that reduces commute lengths to Rancho Mirage jobs would reduce regional VMT even though there likely would be more local VMT including both work and non-work trips.

A valid analysis of the VMT impacts of the Highway 111 Specific Plan must draw a sharp contrast between market-rate housing and workforce housing and evaluate the VMT impacts of each separately.

Unless a large proportion of any additional residential entitlement is workforce housing, there will be a large increase in VMT.

In the DEIR, the word “workforce” appears only once - noting that there is a 20% potential density bonus in the R-H/SP High Density Residential category. (DEIR, p. 36 of 900) There is no discussion of whether this bonus will be attractive enough that workforce housing will be constructed.

Similarly, the DEIR equates density and affordability: “The allowance of such high maximum density demonstrates that the City can provide a substantial number of future residential units that are market- rate affordable.” (DEIR p. 205 of 900) This excerpt raises several questions. What is a “substantial number” of units? Is it 10, 100, 1000? What is “market-rate affordable”? Is it $1 million instead of $1.2 million? How does the higher allowed density translate into actual new housing units that would be affordable to the City’s workforce?
Without enforceable commitments for a large portion of the increased residential entitlement to be workforce housing the Highway 111 Specific Plan will cause an excessive increase in VMT.

Sincerely,

Norman L. Marshall

10-402
9 Resume
NORMAN L. MARSHALL, PRESIDENT
[email protected]

EDUCATION:

Master of Science in Engineering Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, 1982 Bachelor of Science in Mathematics, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, 1977 PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: (32 Years, 18 at Smart Mobility, Inc.) Norm Marshall helped found Smart Mobility, Inc. in 2001. Prior to this, he was at RSG for 14 years where he developed a national practice in travel demand modeling. He specializes in analyzing the relationships between the built environment and travel behavior and doing planning that coordinates multi-modal transportation with land use and community needs.

Regional Land Use/Transportation Scenario Planning
Portland Area Comprehensive Transportation System (PACTS) – the Portland Maine Metropolitan Planning Organization. Updating regional travel demand model with new data (including AirSage), adding a truck model, and multiclass assignment including differentiation between cash toll and transponder payments.

Loudoun County Virginia Dynamic Traffic Assignment – Enhanced subarea travel demand model to include Dynamic Traffic Assignment (Cube). Model being used to better understand impacts of roadway expansion on induced travel.

Vermont Agency of Transportation-Enhanced statewide travel demand model to evaluate travel impacts of closures and delays resulting from severe storm events. Model uses innovate Monte Carlo simulations process to account for combinations of failures.

California Air Resources Board – Led team including the University of California in $250k project that reviewed the ability of the new generation of regional activity-based models and land use models to accurately account for greenhouse gas emissions from alternative scenarios including more compact walkable land use and roadway pricing. This work included hands-on testing of the most complex travel demand models in use in the U.S. today.

Climate Plan (California statewide) – Assisted large coalition of groups in reviewing and participating in the target setting process required by Senate Bill 375 and administered by the California Air Resources Board to reduce future greenhouse gas emissions through land use measures and other regional initiatives.

Chittenden County (2060 Land use and Transportation Vision Burlington Vermont region) – led extensive public visioning project as part of MPO’s long-range transportation plan update.

Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization – Implemented walk, transit and bike models within regional travel demand model. The bike model includes skimming bike networks including on-road and off-road bicycle facilities with a bike level of service established for each segment.

Chicago Metropolis Plan and Chicago Metropolis Freight Plan (6-county region)— developed alternative transportation scenarios, made enhancements in the regional travel demand model, and used the enhanced 10-403
10 model to evaluate alternative scenarios including development of alternative regional transit concepts.

Developed multi-class assignment model and used it to analyze freight alternatives including congestion pricing and other peak shifting strategies.

Municipal Planning
City of Grand Rapids – Michigan Street Corridor – developed peak period subarea model including non- motorized trips based on urban form. Model is being used to develop traffic volumes for several alternatives that are being additional analyzed using the City’s Synchro model

City of Omaha - Modified regional travel demand model to properly account for non-motorized trips, transit trips and shorter auto trips that would result from more compact mixed-use development. Scenarios with different roadway, transit, and land use alternatives were modeled.

City of Dublin (Columbus region) – Modified regional travel demand model to properly account for non- motorized trips and shorter auto trips that would result from more compact mixed-use development. The model was applied in analyses for a new downtown to be constructed in the Bridge Street corridor on both sides of an historic village center.

City of Portland, Maine – Implemented model improvements that better account for non-motorized trips and interactions between land use and transportation and applied the enhanced model to two subarea studies.

City of Honolulu – Kaka’ako Transit Oriented Development (TOD) – applied regional travel demand model in estimating impacts of proposed TOD including estimating internal trip capture.

City of Burlington (Vermont) Transportation Plan – Led team that developing Transportation Plan focused on supporting increased population and employment without increases in traffic by focusing investments and policies on transit, walking, biking and Transportation Demand Management.

Transit Planning
Regional Transportation Authority (Chicago) and Chicago Metropolis 2020 – evaluated alternative 2020 and 2030 system-wide transit scenarios including deterioration and enhance/expand under alternative land use and energy pricing assumptions in support of initiatives for increased public funding.

Capital Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Austin, TX) Transit Vision – analyzed the regional effects of implementing the transit vision in concert with an aggressive transit-oriented development plan developed by Calthorpe Associates. Transit vision includes commuter rail and BRT.

Bus Rapid Transit for Northern Virginia HOT Lanes (Breakthrough Technologies, Inc and Environmental Defense.) – analyzed alternative Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) strategies for proposed privately-developing High Occupancy Toll lanes on I-95 and I-495 (Capital Beltway) including different service alternatives (point-to-point services, trunk lines intersecting connecting routes at in-line stations, and hybrid).

Roadway Corridor Planning
I-30 Little Rock Arkansas – Developed enhanced version of regional travel demand model that integrates TransCAD with open source Dynamic Traffic Assignment (DTA) software, and used to model I-30 alternatives.

Freeway bottlenecks are modeled much more accurately than in the base TransCAD model. 10-404
11 South Evacuation Lifeline (SELL) – In work for the South Carolina Coastal Conservation League, used Dynamic Travel Assignment (DTA) to estimate evaluation times with different transportation alternatives in coastal South Caroline including a new proposed freeway.

Hudson River Crossing Study (Capital District Transportation Committee and NYSDOT) – Analyzing long term capacity needs for Hudson River bridges which a special focus on the I-90 Patroon Island Bridge where a microsimulation VISSIM model was developed and applied.

PUBLICATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS (partial list)

DTA Love: Co-leader of workshop on Dynamic Traffic Assignment at the June 2019 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.

Forecasting the Impossible: The Status Quo of Estimating Traffic Flows with Static Traffic Assignment and the Future of Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Research in Transportation Business and Management 2018.

Assessing Freeway Expansion Projects with Regional Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Presented at the August 2018 Transportation Research Board Tools of the Trade Conference on Transportation Planning for Small and Medium Sized Communities.

Vermont Statewide Resilience Modeling. With Joseph Segale, James Sullivan and Roy Schiff. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.

Assessing Freeway Expansion Projects with Regional Dynamic Traffic Assignment. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.

Pre-Destination Choice Walk Mode Choice Modeling. Presented at the May 2017 Transportation Research Board Planning Applications Conference.

A Statistical Model of Regional Traffic Congestion in the United States, presented at the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.

MEMBERSHIPS/AFFILIATIONS
Associate Member, Transportation Research Board (TRB)

Member and Co-Leader Project for Transportation Modeling Reform, Congress for the New Urbanism (CNU)

10-405

GERALD FORD DRIVE

MONTEREY AVENUE

VERSAILLES
DRIVE
1 9,298 SF
EX. LANDSCAPE EASEMENT
EX. R/W & PROJECT BOUNDARY
EX. C/L
EX. CURB &
GUTTER
20' 55' 55'
EX. LOT LINE PER
RECORD MAP NO. 37563 (TYP.)
175'

SEA HOLLY ROAD

BLUE OASIS DRIVE

AZURE SEA AVENUE

PURPLE IRIS WAY

RADIANCE DRIVE

BLUE OASIS DRIVE
STREET "C"
STREET "E"
STREET "E"
STREET "A"
STREET "B"
ALLEY "B"
ALLEY "A"
ALLEY "D"
ALLEY "C"
STREET "A"
STREET "C"
STREET "C"
ALLEY "K"
ALLEY "J"
ALLEY "I"
ALLEY "G"
ALLEY "F"
STREET "B"
STREET "D"
ALLEY "E"
255'

WELL SITE
32,677 SF

0.75 AC.

C.V.W.D.
255'
355'
460'
5200'
EX. LANDSCAPE

EASEMENT
2 9,206 SF
3 8,901 SF
4 8,463 SF
5 8,181 SF
6 8,101 SF
7 8,100 SF
8 8,100 SF
9 8,100 SF
10 8,100 SF
11 8,100 SF
12 8,100 SF
13 9,175 SF14
9,151 SF
15 9,324 SF
16 9,304 SF
17 9,231 SF
18 10,451 SF
19 6,656 SF
20 6,250 SF
21 6,250 SF
22 6,250 SF
23 9,614 SF
24 9,699 SF
25 9,699 SF26
12,399 SF
27 12,399 SF
28 12,399 SF
29 12,399 SF
30 12,399 SF
31 9,699 SF
32 9,699 SF
33 9,699 SF
34 9,559 SF 35
8,100 SF
47 12,017 SF
48 7,331 SF
49 10,532 SF
6,546 SF
36 6,462 SF
37 6,796 SF
7,102 SF
9,256 SF
11,716 SF
42 13,699 SF
41 10,563 SF
40 13,699 SF
38 8,559 SF
39 10,516 SF
50 9,129 SF
51 9,087 SF
52 9,087 SF
53 8,095 SF
54 6,250 SF
55 6,250 SF
72 8,460 SF
71 6,625 SF
70 6,987 SF
69 7,027 SF
68 9,058 SF
58 10,497 SF
57 7,485 SF
56 11,719 SF
65 7,320 SF
66 5,487 SF
67 7,291 SF
59 5,671 SF
60 11,077 SF
61 7,086 SF
62 6,138 SF
63 6,138 SF
64 6,761 SF
79 6,408 SF
80 5,990 SF
86 9,023 SF
85 7,330 SF
87 8,683 SF
88 6,666 SF
89 7,176 SF
90 6,263 SF
91 6,250 SF
92 8,511 SF
73 7,996 SF
74 6,250 SF
75 6,398 SF
76 6,445 SF
77 6,445 SF
78 7,986 SF
98 11,736 SF
97 6,856 SF
96 6,672 SF
95 6,625 SF
94 6,250 SF
93 8,246 SF
99 5,285 SF
100
5,250 SF
101
6,029 SF
105
6,897 SF
106
5,880 SF
107
6,079 SF
108
6,210 SF
109
5,250 SF
110
5,100 SF
111
5,610 SF
116
6,857 SF
117
5,775 SF
118
5,775 SF
119
6,595 SF
123
7,449 SF
124
5,295 SF
125
5,374 SF
126
9,759 SF
127
5,413 SF
128
5,500 SF
129
6,738 SF
130
6,347 SF
131
5,314 SF
132
5,314 SF133
5,314 SF
134
5,314 SF
135
5,314 SF
136
7,791 SF
122
7,058 SF
121
5,730 SF
120
8,080 SF
115
7,484 SF
114
5,393 SF
113
5,393 SF
112
5,393 SF
104
6,040 SF
103
6,040 SF
102
7,958 SF
84 7,074 SF
83 5,429 SF
82 5,287 SF
81 7,011 SF
143
4,908 SF
142
4,600 SF141
4,600 SF
140
4,692 SF139
4,692 SF
138
4,692 SF137
7,339 SF
144
5,355 SF145
5,355 SF
146
5,355 SF147
5,355 SF
148
5,355 SF149
5,355 SF
150
7,359 SF
162
5,841 SF
161
5,841 SF160
5,841 SF
159
7,423 SF
166
7,287 SF
165
5,841 SF
164
5,841 SF
163
5,896 SF
170
6,330 SF
169
5,985 SF168
5,985 SF
167
7,431 SF
171
6,931 SF
172
6,300 SF
173
6,300 SF
174
8,148 SF
180
6,395 SF
179
5,392 SF
178
5,250 SF
177
6,436 SF176
6,094 SF
175
6,367 SF
187
7,455 SF
186
5,696 SF
185
6,187 SF
184
6,090 SF
183
6,090 SF
182
5,997 SF
181
6,471 SF
LOT "J"
28,829 SF

0.66 AC.

LOT "B"
18,812 SF

0.43 AC.

LOT "A"
152,805 SF

3.51 AC.

LOT "T"
28,353 SF

0.65 AC.

LOT "V"
73,787 SF

1.69 AC.
188
213,481 SF

4.90 AC.
46 45
44 43
EX. C/L &

CITY LIMITS
EX. R/W &

PROJECT BOUNDARY
STREET "C"
LOT "D"
4,307 SF / 0.10 AC.

EX. LOT LINE PER

RECORD MAP
NO. 37563 (TYP.)
191
61,371 SF

1.41 AC.
189
221,735 SF

5.09 AC. 60' 60'
152'
60'
155'
60'
155'
41'
135'
126'
54'
140'
31'
90'
50'
50'
50'
50'
125'
50'
50'
125'
50'125'
133' 50'
50' 139' 60'
60' 146'
70'
70' 152'
126'
148'
70'
148'
126'
161'
170'
61'148'
51'
136'
51'
107'
66'41'
44' 66'
50'
111'
106'
67'
78'
49'
49'
53'
45'
50'
51'
56'
53'
57'
55'
55'
48'
39'
50'
50'
71'
50'
75'
63'
50'
50'
72'
51'
51'
51'
51'
51'
51'
51'
51'
51'
50'
50'
55'
56'
125'
54'
97'
100'
50'125'50'
50'125'
50'
125'
125'46'
125'
46'
125'
144'
51'155'
53'
73'
100'
67'
125'
52'
125'
53'
125'
53'
101'
44'
125'
69'
100'
65'
125'
41'
50'
125'
50'
125'125'
49'
125'
49'40'
99'
129'
70'
128'
50'
126'
51'
125'
50'
125'
50'
50'
41'
72'
65'
45'
125'
50'
50'
125'
53'
53'
125'
53'
53'
127'
53'
53'46'
132'
51'53'
116'
76'
109'
54'
135'
54'
137'
54'
137'
53'
137'
53'
136'
60'
135'
60'
60'
135'
60'
60'
135'
60'
60'
135'
60'
60'
135'
60'
60'
135'
60'
135'
60'60'
135'
60'
145'
60'
138'
50'
73'
18'
81'
82'
82'
82'
82'
46'
53'
60' 60'
60'
60'
126'
25'
26'
36'
41'
98'
42'
209' 71'
209'
34'
36'
51'
131'
54'
132'
71'
26'
26'
60'
60'
54'
54'
54'
42'
104'
37'54'44'
38'
65' 55' 55'
62'
106'
49'
54'
50'
3 9'
3 8'
99'
36'
38'60'
99'
117'
39' 54'
45'
96'
64'
201'
47' 82'
59'
169'
52'
50'
27'
25'
64'
54'
50'
LOT "F"

0.06 AC.

LOT "E"

0.05 AC.

LOT "A"
LOT "A"
33'
EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY &

LOT LINE PER RECORD
MAP NO.37856

BEACH CLUB
247,399 SF

5.68 AC.

LOT "W"
24'
212'
60'
57'
60'
57'
66'
56'
56'
56'
EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY &
LOT LINE PER RECORD MAP NO. 37856
LOT "X"
N 00°15'44" W 358.00'
N 00°15'44" W 185.00'
N 89°44'16" E 506.64'
N 89°39'32" E 989.32'
N 89°39'32" E 150.04'
N 00°12'38" E 253.20'N 00°44'39" W 180.03'N 00°12'38" E 269.63' N 89°47'22" W 770.44'
N 47°29'30" E 439.96'
N 47°29'30" E 241.35'
N 64°27'21" W 648.27'
N 23°36'18" E 735.22'
N 28°23'58" E 120.90'
∆=20°25'12"
R=90.00'

32.08'
N 00°12'38" E

69.08'
N 89°44'16" E

32.21'
∆=04°47'40"
R=989.50'

82.80'
=53°40'28" R=458.00' 429.05'
=22°56'29" R=550.00' 220.22'
=09°03'38" R=1500.00' 237.20'
=58°07'38" R=390.00' 395.66'
=87°19'35" R=200.00' 304.83'
=48°31'35" R=575.00' 486.99'
=18°37'55" R=1610.50' 523.72'
∆=19°18'10"
R=340.00'
114.54'
∆=18°22'14"
R=240.00'

76.95'
∆=133°45'34"
R=50.00'
116.73'
∆=105°15'47"
R=65.00'
119.42'
∆=23°15'08"
R=210.00'

85.22'
∆=16°40'49"
R=245.00'

71.33'
∆=17°41'13" R=136.14' 42.03'
N 42°14'13" E

82.98'
∆=17°41'13" R=160.04' 49.40'
N 50°40'11" W

36.41'
∆=12°54'59"
R=749.50'
168.96'
N 10°34'26" W

86.45'
N 42°30'30" W

95.00'
R = 150.0'
R = 283.5'
R = 300.0'
R = 250.0'
R = 1160.0'
R = 1293.5'
R = 400.0'
R = 266.5'
R = 500.0'
R = 178.0'
R = 250.0'
R = 200.0'
R = 200.0'
R = 1000.0'
R = 1000.0'
R = 1000.0'
R = 300.0'
R = 1000.0'
R = 1000.0'
R = 300.0'
R = 1600.0'
R = 700.0'
R = 180.0'
R = 800.0'
R = 500.0'
R = 285.0'
R = 300.0'
R = 1000.0'
R = 500.0'
R = 500.0'
R = 1293.5'
ALLEY "E"
ALLEY "A"
28'
47'
23'
15'
33'
15'
15'33'15'
15' 33'15'
15'
33'
5'
24'
5'
EX. 24' ACCESS EASEMENT PER
RECORD MAP NO. 37563
EX. 24' ACCESS EASEMENT PER
RECORD MAP NO. 37563
105'
105'
56'
105'
89'
58'
120'
67'
99'
125'
81'
LOT "C"

0.05 AC.
53'
108'
66'
106'107'
105'
49'105'
49'
105'
66'
81'
41'
48'
48'
38'
68'
68'
86'
56'
32'
56'
56'
105'
56'
56'
105'
56'
58'
105'
105'
43'
31'
35'
102'
55'
88'43'
126'
49'
50'
12'
32'
87'
50'
50'
105'
58'
58'
49'
53'
105'
45'
105'
49'
55'
28'
27'
114'
50'
54'
49'
74'
110'
79'
48'
72'
81'
57'
57'
105'
57'
105'
55'
106'
105'
38'
51'
51'
107'
51'
107'
50'
107'
107'
107'
48'
50'
109'
54'
50'
106'
50'
50'
106'
50'
50'
106'50'
50'
106'
50'
50'
106'
85'
106'
41'
90'
37'
50'
106'
64'
55'
67'
105'
91'
105'
55'
105'
105'
69'
107'
51'
105'
50'
50'
105'
87'
54'
49'
49'
105'
49'
105'49'
105'50'
105'
81' 65'
82'
105'
48'
105'
55'
105'
55'
83'
36'
68'105'
44'
81'
51'105'
50'
105'
49'
80'
43'
70'
54'
38'
39'
112'
49'
109'
88'
49'
92'
45'
36'
85'
106'
65'
50'
106'
50'
110'
40'
50'
110'
45'
110'
16'
115'
120'
50'
112'
66'
65'
190
42,559 SF

0.98 AC.

E
E
E
E
D
E
D
E
D D
R=300.0'
D
D
D
D
E
E
D
D
E
E
D
D
E
E
60' 25'
24'
D
D
33'
125'135'
135'
53'
135'
53'
135'
145'62'
145' 145'
62'
145'
62'
145'
62'
145'
62'
145'
135'
53'
135'
53'135'
53'
135'
60'
60'
135'
90'
90'
90'
109' 109'
109'
109'
109'
90'
90'
53'
89'
87'
135'
379'
44'
412'
54'
61'
105'
56'
50'
46'105'
108'
105'
51'
105'
51'
105'
51'
105'
51'
105'
51'
105'
105'51'
105'
105'
56'
105'
56'
105'
56'
105'
107'
76'
105'60'
105'60'
105'
71'
106'
105'
67'
117'
105'
105'
105'58'
105'58'
105'59'
105'
72'
69'
59'
PROP. 15' LANDSCAPE &
P.U.E. EASEMENT (TYP.)
PROP. 15' LANDSCAPE &
P.U.E. EASEMENT (TYP.)
G
G
A A
B B
105'
27'
52'
59'
50'
105'
99'
83'
76'
4 0 '
51'
41'
79'
46'
3 8 '
R = 195.5'
71'
R = 1000.0'
R = 1036.0'
R = 1594.0'
R = 766.0'
R = 1006.0'
R = 700.0'
R = 300.0'
R = 300
.0'
R = 300.0'
69'
71'
105' 107'
67'
79' 39'
50'
R = 1293.5'
154
5,775 SF153
5,775 SF152
5,775 SF
151
5,775 SF
158
5,775 SF
157
5,775 SF
156
5,775 SF
155
5,775 SF
55'
105'
55'
55'
105'55'
55'
105'
55'
55'
105'55'
105'
55'
55'
105'
55'
55'
105'
55'
55'
105'
55'
105'
55'
105'
LOT "O"
31,682 SF

0.73 AC.

LOT "N"
24,945 SF

0.57 AC.

E
E
R = 700.0'
ALLEY "H"
24'
24'

TIDE SWELL WAY

BRILLIANCE
AVENUE
33'
71'
105'
71'
81'
15'
33'
15'
83'
228'
180'
318'
264'
555'
54'
154'
458'
271'
292'
1127'
669'
15'
15'
PROP. TEMPORARY

EMERGENCY
ACCESS
POINT
PROP. TEMPORARY ACCESS DRIVEWAY

WITH GATE & KNOX BOX
FF
PROP. TEMPORARY

EMERGENCY ACCESS
E
E
24'
=51°01'36" R=1019.50' 907.95'
LOT "M"
3,773 SF

0.09 AC.

LOT "U"
3,757 SF

0.09 AC.

LOT "G"
2,326 SF

0.05 AC.

LOT "L"
3,571 SF

0.08 AC.

LOT "K"
4,298 SF

0.10 AC.

LOT "R"
3,587 SF

0.08 AC.

LOT "S"
3,641 SF

0.08 AC.

LOT "H"
15,904 SF

0.37 AC.

LOT "Q"
13,166 SF

0.30 AC.

LOT "P"
15,011 SF

0.34 AC.

LOT "I"
2,279 SF

0.05 AC.

PROP. CVWD WELL SITE

DISCHARGE PIPE LINE
PROP. RETENTION BASIN
PROP. 24' ACCESS

EASEMENT
C
C
G
G

MONTEREY AVENUE

FRANK SINATRA DRIVE

GERALD FORD DRIVE

BOB HOPE DRIVE
PHASE 1B & 1C
LOT 328 & 329
PER TR. NO. 37856 /
LOT 7 & 8 PER
TR. NO. 37563
60' (PROJECT SIDE)60' (BY OTHERS)
120' (ULTIMATE R/W)
16'
8' 8'
45'
13'12'20'
7'
13' 12' 20'
7'45'
25'
EX.

EX. PAVEMENTEX. PAVEMENT
EX. CURB &
GUTTER
PROP. 10' MEANDERING

SIDEWALK

LANDSCAPE

EASEMENT
ULT.

R/W
ULT.

R/W
EX. TRAVEL LANE
EX. RAISED MEDIAN
EX. BARRIER CURBEX. BARRIER CURB
EX. TRAVEL LANE
EX. CURB &
GUTTER

SECTION B-B

MONTEREY AVENUE
(MAJOR ARTERIAL / PUBLIC ROAD)
N.T.S.

CL
EX. TRAVEL LANE EX. TRAVEL LANE
16'16'
33' *15' MIN.*15' MIN.
5' 5'5' 5'
2'
MIN.
5'5'
2'
MIN.
6' 6' 3'
43' CVWD EASEMENT
.5'.5'

17.5' 17.5' 3' 2'2.5' 5.5'
10'10'
*NOTE: PEDESTRIAN / LANDSCAPE EASEMENT

AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS MAY NOT

APPLY WHEN ABUTTING AN OPEN SPACE LOT
C.V.W.D. MINIMUM
PROP. WEDGE
CURB
PROP. WEDGE
CURB
PROP. C.V.W.D. NON-

POTABLE WATER
PROP. C.V.W.D. NON-

POTABLE WATER
PROP. C.V.W.D.

SEWER PROP. C.V.W.D.

WATER
PROP. STORM DRAIN
PROP. R/W
& LOT LINE
PROP. R/W
& LOT LINE
PROP.

ESMT.

PROP.

ESMT.

PROP. PEDESTRIAN /
LANDSCAPE ESMT.

PROP.

P.U.E.

SIDEWALKSIDEWALK PROP.

P.U.E.
2%
2%
PROP. PEDESTRIAN /
LANDSCAPE ESMT. CL
CL

SETBACK TO TREE C/L
C.V.W.D. MINIMUM

SETBACK TO TREE C/L

SECTION D-D
STREET "A" THRU "E", PORTION OF BLUE OASIS DRIVE, RADIANCE DRIVE, PURPLE IRIS WAY,

SEA HOLLY ROAD, TIDE SWELL WAY & MARINE WAY
(PRIVATE ROAD)
N.T.S.
16'
33'23' 15' MIN.
5'5' 5'10'
2'
MIN.
3' 5'VARIES
6'6'

7.5'
.5'
16'
.5'
43' CVWD EASEMENT

17.5'17.5'8.5' 8'
10' 10'
PROP. WEDGE
CURB
PROP. WEDGE
CURB
2'
MIN.

PROP. STORM DRAIN
PROP.

C.V.W.D.

WATER
PROP. C.V.W.D.

SEWERPROP. C.V.W.D. NON-

POTABLE WATER
PROP. PAVEMENT
C.V.W.D. MINIMUM

SETBACK TO TREE C/L
C.V.W.D. MINIMUM

SETBACK TO TREE C/L

SECTION C-C

PORTION OF BLUE OASIS DRIVE
(PRIVATE ROAD)
N.T.S.

PROP. R/W
& LOT LINE
PROP. R/W
& LOT LINE
PROP.

ESMT.

PROP.

ESMT.

PROP. PEDESTRIAN /
LANDSCAPE ESMT.

PROP.

P.U.E.

SIDEWALK
PROP. PEDESTRIAN /
LANDSCAPE ESMT.

PROP.

P.U.E.

PROP. MULTI-USE

MEANDERING PATH
2%
2%
CL
CL

12.5'
PROP. STORM DRAIN

EASEMENT
PROP.

P/L
*NOTE: MINIMUM DISTANCE APPLICABLE BETWEEN

RADIANCE DRIVE AND HELIOTROPE AVENUE
12'12'
24'
5' 5'
6' 6'
32' CVWD EASEMENT
NOTE: NON-POTABLE WATER AND

ELECTRICAL TO BE PLACED IN FRONTAGE

STREET AND OR PARKWAY
*DRIVEWAY 1% MIN. TO 15% MAX.

PROP.

PAVEMENT
2%
34'
1'1'
*
*
PROP. BUILDING
6'
PROP. C.V.W.D.

WATER
6'
12'
PROP. C.V.W.D.

SEWER
PROP. RIBBON
GUTTER
PROP. R/W
& LOT LINE
PROP. R/W
& LOT LINE
PROP. BUILDING
2%

SECTION E-E
ALLEYS "A" THRU "K"
(PRIVATE ROAD)
N.T.S.

CL
CL
55' (PROJECT SIDE) 55' (BY OTHERS)
110' (ULTIMATE R/W)
16'
8'8'
35'
13' 16' 6'
12'
13'16'6'
12' 35'
20'
EX.

EX. PAVEMENT EX. PAVEMENT
EX. CURB &
GUTTER
PROP. 8' MEANDERING

SIDEWALK

LANDSCAPE

EASEMENT
ULT.

R/W
ULT.

R/W
EX. TRAVEL LANE EX. TRAVEL LANE
EX. RAISED MEDIAN
EX. BARRIER CURB EX. BARRIER CURB
EX. TRAVEL LANE EX. TRAVEL LANE
EX. CURB &

GUTTERSECTION A-A

GERALD FORD DRIVE
(MINOR ARTERIAL / PUBLIC ROAD)
N.T.S.

CL
3" AC OVER

COMPACTED NATIVE
24'

SECTION F-F

TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ACCESS
N.T.S.
16'16'
33' *15' MIN.*23 MIN.
5' 5'5' 5'
2'
MIN.
5'5'
2'
MIN.
6' 6' 3'
43' CVWD EASEMENT
.5'.5'

17.5' 17.5' 3' 2'2.5' 5.5'
10'10'
*NOTE: PEDESTRIAN / LANDSCAPE EASEMENT

AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS MAY NOT

APPLY WHEN ABUTTING AN OPEN SPACE LOT
C.V.W.D. MINIMUM
PROP. WEDGE
CURB
PROP. WEDGE
CURB
PROP. C.V.W.D. NON-

POTABLE WATER
PROP. C.V.W.D. NON-

POTABLE WATER
PROP. C.V.W.D.

SEWER PROP. C.V.W.D.

WATER
PROP. STORM DRAIN
PROP. R/W
& LOT LINE
PROP. R/W
& LOT LINE
PROP.

LOT LINE
PROP.

ESMT.

PROP. PEDESTRIAN /
LANDSCAPE ESMT.

PROP.

P.U.E.

SIDEWALKSIDEWALK PROP.

P.U.E.
2%
2%
PROP. PEDESTRIAN /

COMMON LANDSCAPE LOT CL
CL

SETBACK TO TREE C/L
C.V.W.D. MINIMUM

SETBACK TO TREE C/L

SECTION G-G

PORTION OF BLUE OASIS DRIVE
(PRIVATE ROAD)
N.T.S.
8'
MSA CONSULTING, INC.
> PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING
34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com
SHEET
SHEETS
1 OF
1 EAST
NORTH
SOUTH
WEST

CENTERLINE

EASEMENT

EXISTING
(E)
(N)
(S)
(W)
C/L
ESMT.

EX.

ABBREVIATIONS

ACREAGE AC

CURB AND GUTTERC&G

ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERAPN

E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT
A.C. ASPHALT CONCRETE
MIN. MINIMUM
MAX. MAXIMUMEXISTING IRRIGATION

EXISTING GAS

EXISTING EASEMENT

EXISTING ELECTRIC

EXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINE

EXISTING CABLE

EXISTING CONTOURS

EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS
LEGEND

XEXISTING EASEMENT DELTA

EXISTING LOT LINE

EXISTING TELEPHONE

BOUNDARYBNDRY

EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT
M.B. MAP BOOK
NUMBER

PROPOSED

RIGHT OF WAY

TYPICAL
NO.

PROP.

R/W
TYP.

P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT

SF SQUARE FEET

RADIUS R
STANDARDSTD.

P/L PROPERTY LINE
N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE

R-L LOW DENSITY (RESIDENTIAL)

UG UNDERGROUND

OVERHEADO/H

OPEN SPACE / PARKSOS/PP
PAGE PG.

EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE

EXISTING SEWER

EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED CURB

PROPOSED EASEMENT

EXISTING CITY / COUNTY LIMITS

EXISTING SEWER FORCE MAIN

EXISTING WATER

PROPOSED LOT LINE

PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY

PROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINE

TENTATIVE TRACT MAP BOUNDARY
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38291

DATA TABLE
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS:685-220-016, 685-220-017, 685-220-018, 685-220-019 EXHIBIT DATE: JUNE 9, 2022
SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY:

ADDRESS:

INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC.
7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A"
RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503
DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY:APRIL 16, 2018
TELEPHONE:(951) 687-4252
PUBLIC UTILITY PURVEYORS:

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY

FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS

COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT

SPECTRUM

COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT

UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT
EXISTING GROSS ACREAGE70.44 AC.

EXISTING ZONING:

PROPOSED ZONING:

EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:

PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE:

SECTION 31 SPECIFIC PLAN WITH MIXED USE (M-U) UNDERLAY
SECTION 31 SPECIFIC PLAN WITH MIXED USE (M-U) UNDERLAY
SECTION 31 SPECIFIC PLAN WITH MIXED USE (M-U) UNDERLAY
LAND USE DESCRIPTION:ACREAGE:

PROPOSED BEACH CLUB (LOT "W")5.68 AC.

10.15 AC. PROPOSED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE LOTS (LOTS "A" THRU "V") 1 EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES:

ZONE "X": AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD

AS SHOWN ON RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS, COMMUNITY PANEL MAP NUMBERS 06065C1595G
FEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION:

EFFECTIVE DATE: AUGUST 28, 2008.

PROPOSED NET ACREAGE69.69 AC.

APPLICANT /
ADDRESS:

CONTACT:
#1910-1177 WEST HASTINGS STREET
VANCOUVER, BC CANADA V6E 2K3
CHRIS TSAKUMISTELEPHONE:(604) 270-1890 x222
EXHIBIT PREPARER:

ADDRESS:

MSA CONSULTING, INC.
34200 BOB HOPE DRIVE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270
CONTACT:PAUL DEPALATIS, AICP
TELEPHONE:(760) 320-9811

REVISIONS
NO. DATE
LIQUEFACTION:MODERATE LIQUEFACTION ZONE
NOTES:1.

SECTION 31 SPECIFIC PLAN WITH MIXED USE (M-U) UNDERLAY

IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
(760) 324-4991
(800) 427-2200
(800) 921-8101
(760) 398-2651
(877) 719-3278
(760) 398-2651
(800) 227-2600

DESCRIPTION
ELECTRIC:

GAS:

TELEPHONE:

WATER:

CABLE:

SEWER:

USA:

LOTS 7 AND 8 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37563, M.B. 474/88-93 AND LOTS 328 AND 329 OF TRACT MAP NO. 37856, M.B. 481/68-87, LOCATED IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 6 EAST, LAND OWNER:
2ASSIGN, AFFECTING PARCEL A, FOR STREET & PUBLIC UTILITY & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 22, 1994 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 364597 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

DEDICATION IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE & ITS SUCCESSOR OR FOR STREET, PUBLIC UTILITY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JUNE 30, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-0334984 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

DEDICATION IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE AFFECTING PARCEL A,

THIS MAP DOES NOT INCLUDE THE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP OF THE

2. THERE ARE NO EXISTING DWELLINGS, BUILDINGS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES KNOWN ON THIS PROPERTY.

EC RANCHO MIRAGE HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
c/o EC RANCHO MIRAGE HOLDINGS GP CORP.

DRAINAGE, EROSION CONTROL AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 22, 1994 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 364593 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE AFFECTING PARCEL A, FOR (STORM DRAIN EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE)
3 CONSTRUCTING TRANSITIONAL SLOPES FROM STREET CONSTRUCTION TO THE EXISTING

AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE AFFECTING PARCEL A, FOR GROUND, AND FOR THE PURPOSES OF DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL AND INCIDENTAL4 PURPOSES, RECORDED JUNE 30, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-0334985 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (STORM DRAIN EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE)
PROPOSED PRIVATE STREETS10.23 AC.

PROPOSED PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL LOTS (LOTS 1 THRU 191)43.63 AC.

LAND DIVIDER.

PROPOSED C.V.W.D. WELL SITE (LOT "X")0.75 AC.

CONSTRUCTING, OPERATING AND MAINTAINING A SAND FENCE AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 2010 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2010-0075808 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.

AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE AFFECTING PARCEL A, FOR 5 N.T.S.

VICINITY MAP
SITE

BOB HOPE DRIVE
GERALD

RAMON ROAD
FRANK

MONTEREY

PORTOLA
AVENUE
AVENUE

DINAH SHORE

COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE
INTERSTATE 10

CITY OF
RANCHO

COOK STREET
MIRAGE

CITY OF
PALM
DESERT
DRIVE
SINATRA DR.

TR. NO.
37856

FORD DRIVE
PH. 1B
& 1C

INDEX MAP
SCALE: 1" = 500'
(STREETS "A" THRU "E", ALLEYS "A" THRU "K", BLUE OASIS DRIVE, BRILLIANCE AVENUE,

PURPLE IRIS WAY, RADIANCE DRIVE, SEA HOLLY ROAD & TIDE SWELL WAY SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN.
(TO BE ABANDONED)
R:\2051\ACAD\Planning\Tentative Map\TTM 38291 - Phase 1B & 1C\2051 TTM 38291.dwg, 6/9/2022 8:33:11 AM, dgallerani, MSA Consulting, Inc.

ATTACHMENT 7
10-406
MSA CONSULTING, INC.
> PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING
34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com
R:\2051\ACAD\Grading\Preliminary\Tract 38291\2051 Tract 38291 Preliminary Grading Exhibit.dwg, 5/23/2022 8:57:11 AM, swieborg, MSA Consulting, Inc.

ATTACHMENT 8
10-407

MONTEREY AVENUE

SEA HOLLY ROAD

BLUE OASIS DRIVE

GERALD FORD DRIVE

AZURE SEA AVENUE

PURPLE IRIS WAY

RADIANCE DRIVE

BLUE OASIS DRIVE
PLUM STREET(STREET "E")

ALLIUM AVENUE WISTERIA VINE DRIVE

MAUVE LANE
(ALLEY "A")

TYRIAN LANE

TIDE POOL WAY
(STREET "A")

PRISMATIC BOULEVARD

PRISMATIC BOULEVARD

BLUE CORN ROAD

TEAL WATER LANE

SCRUB JAY LANE

ULTRAMARINE LANE

BELLFLOWER LANE
(STREET "B")

HIBISCUS

CONEFLOWER LANE

OCEANA ROAD
(ALLEY "A")
(ST. "D")
(ALLEY "D")
(ALLEY "E")
(ALLEY "F")
(ALLEY "G")
(ALLEY "I")
(ALLEY "J")
1 WELL SITE
C.V.W.D.
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15
16 17
18 19
20 21
22 23 24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33
34 35
47 48
49 36 37
42 41
40 38
39 50
51 52
535455
72 71
70 69
68 58 57 56
65 66
67 59
60 61
62 63
64 79
80 86
85 87
88 89
90 91
92 73
74 75
76 77
78 98
97 96
95 94
93 99
100
101
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
116
117
118
119
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
122
121
120
115
114
113
112
104
103
102
84 83 82
81 143
142
141
140
139
138
137144
145
146
147
148
149
150
162
161
160
159
166
165
164
163
170
169
168
167
171
172
173
174
180
179
178
177
176 175
187186
185
184
183
182
181
"B"
"A"
"T"
"V"
188
46 45
44 43
"D"
191
189
"F"
"E"
"A"
"A"

BEACH CLUB
"W"
LOT "X"
"C"
190
"H"
"G"
"J"
"K"
"L"
"N"
"M"
"Q"
"R"
"S"
"U"
"I" (ALLEY "C")

BLUE OASIS DRIVE
LAGOON
AVENUE

TIDE SWELL WAY
(STREET "C")

BRILLIANCE
"O"
"P"
(ALLEY "K")
154
153
152
151
155
156
157
158

BLUESTAR LANE
(ALLEY "H")
AVENUE
BERRY
(STREET "C")
(STREET "C")

PRISMATIC BOULEVARD
MSA CONSULTING, INC.
> PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING
34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com

STREET NAME EXHIBIT

DATA TABLE
EXHIBIT DATE: JUNE 2, 2022

REVISIONS
NO. DATE

IN THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA

DESCRIPTION
FOR TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38291

APPLICANT /
ADDRESS:

CONTACT:
#1910-1177 WEST HASTINGS STREET
VANCOUVER, BC CANADA V6E 2K3
CHRIS TSAKUMIS TELEPHONE: (604) 270-1890 x222
EXHIBIT PREPARER:

ADDRESS:

MSA CONSULTING, INC.
34200 BOB HOPE DRIVE
RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270
CONTACT: PAUL DEPALATIS, AICP TELEPHONE: (760) 320-9811 LAND OWNER:

EC RANCHO MIRAGE HOLDINGS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
c/o EC RANCHO MIRAGE HOLDINGS GP CORP.

STREET NAMES:

STREET "A"

STREET NAME TABLE
TTM STREETS:

ALLIUM AVENUE
STREET "B" WISTERIA VINE DRIVE
STREET "C" PRISMATIC BOULEVARD
STREET "D" HIBISCUS BERRY AVENUE
ALLEY "A" OCEANA ROAD
ALLEY "B" MAUVE LANE
ALLEY "C" TIDE POOL WAY
ALLEY "D" TYRIAN LANE
ALLEY "E" CONEFLOWER LANE
ALLEY "F" BELLFLOWER LANE
ALLEY "G" ULTRAMARINE LANE
ALLEY "I" SCRUB JAY LANE
ALLEY "J" TEAL WATER LANE

AZURE SEA AVENUE

BLUE OASIS DRIVE

PURPLE IRIS WAY

RADIANCE DRIVE

SEA HOLLY ROAD
ALLEY "K" BLUE CORN ROAD
STREET "E" PLUM STREET
APPROVED STREET NAMES PER TRACT MAP NO. 37856:

LEGEND:

TRACT NO. 38291 LOT NUMBER250
TRACT NO. 37856 LOT NUMBER

BRILLIANCE AVENUE

TIDE SWELL WAY
ALLEY "H" BLUESTAR LANE
R:\2051\ACAD\Planning\Street Name & Address\TR38291\2051 Street Name & Address Exhibit - TR38291.dwg, 6/2/2022 4:19:35 PM, dgallerani, MSA Consulting, Inc.

ATTACHMENT 9
10-408

GERALD FORD DRIVE

BOB HOPE DRIVE
LAGOON
312(F)
311(F)
313 (F)
(F)(F)(F)(F)
306(F)
305(F)
304(F)
321(E)
274(E)
273(E)
272(E)
303(F) 5K
302(F) 5K
301(F) 5K
300(F) 5K
299(F) 5K
298(F)
244(E)
245(E)
246(E)
247(E)
248(E)
249(E)
250(E)
177(E)
176(E)
(E)
159(E)
310309308307
175
(E)
174
(E)
173
(E)
172
(E)
171
(E)
170
164(E)(E)
163 (E)
162 (E)
161
(E)
169
(E)
168
(E)
167
(E)
166
(E)
165
160(E)
(E)
181 (E)
180 (E)
179 (E)
178
(E)
192 (E)
193 (E)
194 (E)
195 (E)
196 197(E)
198(E)
(E)
186 (E)
185 (E)
184 (E)
183 (E)
182
(E)
191
(E)
190
(E)
189
(E)
188
(E)
187
(E)
213 (E)
212 (E)
211 (E)
210 (E)
209
(E)
208 (E)
207 (E)
206 (E)
205 (E)
204 (E)
203 (E)
202 (E)
201
(E)
200
199(E)
264(F)
263(F)
262(F)
261(F)
260(F)
(F)
320
(F)
319
(F)
318
317(F)
(F)
324
(F)
325
(F)
326
(F)
327
(F)
269
(F)
270 (F)
271
(F)
265
(F)
266
(F)
267
(F)
268
257(F)
(F)
258 (F)
259
(F)
256 (F)
255 (F)
254 (F)
253 (F)
252 (F)
251
(F)
316
323(E)
(E)
322
(F)
315 (F)
314
55(A)
56(A)
57(A)
58(A)
59(A)
60(A)
61(A)
62(A)
63(A)
64(A)65(A)66(A)67(A)
68(A)
47(A)
48(A)
49(A)
50(A)
51(A)
52(A)
53(A)
54(A)
34(B)
35(B)
36(B)
37(B)
38(B)
39(B)
40(B)
41(B)
42(B)
43(B)
44(B)
45(B)
46(B)
69(B)
70(B)
71(B)
72(B)
73(B)
74(B)
75(B)
76(B)
77(B)
78(B)
79(B)
25(B)
26(B)
27(B)
28(B)
29(B)
30(B)
31(B)
32(B)
33(B)
19(C)
20(C)
21(C)
22(C)
23(C)
24(C)
17(C)
16(C)
15(C)
14(C)
18(C)
12(C)
13(C)
6(C) 7(C) 8(C) 9(C) 10(C)
11(C)
5(C)
4(C)
3(C)
2(C)
1(C)
89(C)
88(C)
87(C)
86(C)
85(C)
84(C)
83(C)
82(C)
81(C)
80(C)
145(C)
146(C)
220(C)
219(C)
218(C)
217(C)
216(C)
215(C)
214(C)
237(D)
238(D)239(D)
240(D)
241(D)
236(D)
235(D)
234(D)
242(D)
243(D)
233(D)
277(D)
278(D)
279(D)
280(D)
281
282(D)283(D)
275(D)
276(D)
284(D)285(D)286(D)
287(D)
288(D)
289(D)(D) (D) (D)(D)(D)(D)(D)(D)
232(D)
231(D)
230(D)
229(D)
228(D)
227(D)
226(D)
225(D)
224(D)
223(D)
222(D)
221(D)
153(D)
154(D)
155(D)
156(D)
130(D)
131(D)132(D) 133(D)
128(D)
127(D)
126(D)
129(D)157(D)
158(D)
125(D)
122(D)
137(D)
136(D)
135(D)
134(D)
138(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
(D)
151(D) 152(D)
96(D)
95(D)
94(D)
93(D)
92(D)
91(D)
90(D)
97(D)
98(D)
99(D)
100(D)
101(D)
102(D)
103(D)
104(D)
105(D)
106(D)
107(D)
108(D)
109(D)
110(D)
111(D)
112(D)
113(D)
114(D)
(D)(D)(D)(D)
119(D)
(D)121(D)
290 291 292293294295296297
120 115116117118
(D)
124
(D)
123
139
140
141
142
143
144
147
148
149
150
(D)
43 (D)
39 41(D)
30(D)
29(D)
28(D)
27(D)
26(D) (E)
23(E)
24 (E)
25 47(E)
(E)
44 (E)
38 (E)
35(E)
34(E)
33 32(E)
31(E)
(E)
1 (E)
2 (E)
3 (E)
4 (E)
5 (E)
6 (E)
7 (E)
8 (E)
9 (E)
10 (E)
11 (E)
12 (E)
13 (E)
14 (E)
15 16(E)
17(E)
18(E)
42(F)
40(F)
93(F)
94(F)
95(F)
96(F)
97(F)
98(F)
87(F)
88(F)
89(F)
90(F)
91(F)
92(F)73(F)
74(F)
75(F)
76(F)
77(F)
78(F)
68(F)
69(F)
70(F)
71(F)
72(F)
(F)
36(F)
37 (F)
46(F)
45 (F)
19(F)
20(F)
21(F)
22 (F)
55 (F)
54 (F)
53 (F)
52 51(F)
50(F)
(F)
56 (F)
57 (F)
58 49(F)
48(F)
(G)
171
(G)
172
(G)
173
(G)
174
(G)
167 (G)
168 (G)
169 (G)
170
(G)
163
(G)
164
(G)
165
(G)
166
(G)
159 (G)
160 (G)
161 (G)
162
(G)
144
(G)
145
(G)
146
(G)
147
(G)
148
(G)
149
(G)
150
(G)
137 (G)
138 (G)
139 (G)
140 (G)
141 (G)
142 (G)
143
(G)
115(G)
114(G)
113(G)
112
(G)
111
(G)
84(G)
83(G)
82(G)
81(G)
64(G)
63(G)
62(G)
61 (G)
60 59(G)
(G)
67 (G)
66 (G)
65 80(G)
79(G)
86(G)
85(G)
101(G)
100(G)
99(G)
107(G)
106(G)
105(G)
(G)
110 (G)
109
(G)
108
(G)
119
(G)
118
(G)
117
(G)
116
(G)
123
(G)
124
(G)
125
(G)
126 (G)
127 (G)
128 (G)
129
(G)
122
(G)
121(G)
120
(G)
130
(G)
131
(G)
132
(G)
133
(G)
134
(G)
135
(G)
136
(G)
104(G)
103(G)
102
(G)
175 (G)
176 (G)
177 (G)
178 (G)
179 (G)
180
(G)
181
(G)
182
(G)
183
(G)
184
(G)
185
(G)
186
(G)
187
188

WELL SITE
MONTEREY AVENUE TTM NO.
37856
TTM NO. 38291
189
190
191
(D)
(G)
155
(G)
156
(G)
157
(G)
158
(G)
151 (G)
152 (G)
153 (G)
154
34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com
MSA CONSULTING, INC.
> PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING
PHASE 1 (TR. 37856) / PHASE 1B & 1C (TR. 38291): RESIDENTIAL LOT TYPES SECTION 31 / COTINO
APRIL 18, 2022
PHASE 1 (TTM NO. 37856) - RESIDENTIAL LOT TYPES

LOT TYPE

MINIMUM LOT

DIMENSIONS

TRACT MAP

NUMBERS PER
MIN. DIMENSIONS

TRACT MAP LOT

LOT STANDARDS

SPECIFIC PLAN
COUNT
LOT
%
LARGE LOT (A)135FT X 200FT47-6822 7%
LARGE LOT (B)25-46 & 69-7933 10%
LARGE LOT (C)43 13%
CONVENTIONAL LOT (D)113 34%
CONVENTIONAL LOT (E)68 21%
CONVENTIONAL LOT (F)48 15%
214-220
1-24, 80-89, 145, 146 &
221-243 & 275-297
90-144, 147-158,
272-274 & 321-323
159-213, 244-250,
310-320 & 324-327
251-271, 298-306,
PHASE 1B & 1C (TTM NO. 38291) - RESIDENTIAL LOT TYPES

LOT TYPE

MINIMUM LOT

DIMENSIONS

TRACT MAP

NUMBERS PER
MIN. DIMENSIONS

TRACT MAP LOT

LOT STANDARDS

SPECIFIC PLAN
COUNT
LOT
%
CONVENTIONAL LOT (D)84%
CONVENTIONAL LOT (E)29 16%
CONVENTIONAL LOT (F)44 24%
CLUSTER LOT (G)106 56%
44 & 47
1-18, 23-25, 31-35, 38,
45, 46, 48, 49, 50-58,
19-22, 36, 37, 40, 42,
68-78 & 87-98
26-30, 39, 41 & 43
59-67, 79-86 & 99-187
TOTAL-327 100% - -
N.T.S.

TOTAL-TBD TBD - -
TBD188 - 191-TBD TBD TBD
SUBTOTAL---187 100%
27,000 SF
120FT X 150FT
18,000 SF
90FT X 140FT
12,600 SF
70FT X 130FT
9,100 SF
60FT X 120FT
7,200 SF
50FT X 110FT
5,500 SF
70FT X 130FT
9,100 SF
60FT X 120FT
7,200 SF
50FT X 110FT
5,500 SF
50FT X 90FT
4,500 SF
& SIZE
& SIZE

LARGE LOT
18,000 SFD

LARGE LOT
18,000 SFD

LARGE LOT
12,500 SFD

CONVENTIONAL
8,000 SFD

CONVENTIONAL
5,500 SFD

CONVENTIONAL
5,500 SFD

CONVENTIONAL
8,000 SFD

CONVENTIONAL
5,500 SFD

CLUSTER

SMALL LOT

CONVENTIONAL
5,500 SFD

DETACHED
(See Tables 13-15
for Development
Standards)
(See Tables 13-15
for Development
Standards)
R:\2051\ACAD\Planning\Site Plan\2051 PH01, 1B & 1C - SP Dev Std Lot Types.dwg, 4/18/2022 3:21:25 PM, dgallerani, MSA Consulting, Inc.

ATTACHMENT 10
10-409

GERALD FORD DRIVE

BOB HOPE DRIVE
LAGOON

WELL SITE

MONTEREY AVENUE
92 91
90 89
88 87
86 85
84 83
82 96
95 94
93 145
146
147
148
149
15 16
17 18
14 13
12 98765
4 3
2 1
10 11
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 6465 6667
68 69
70 71
114115116117118
119
120
121
164
163
162
161
169
168
167
166
165
160
159
122 123 124 125
158
157
175174173172171170
181
180 179 178 176
177
197
198
196
195
194193
192
208
207 206
205
204
203 202
201
200
199
220
219
218
217
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
235
236
237
238239
240
241
284285286287
288
289290291292293294295296297
298
299
300
301
302
303
310
317
318
319
320
304
305
306
309308307
312
313
314
315
316 321
322
323
273
274
272
324
327
269
270
271 264
263
262
261
260
259258
257
268
267
153
154
155
156 134
135
136
137
80 79
78 77
76 133132131130 106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
72 73
74 75
216
215
214
212
211
210
209
224
254
191
190189
188
187
186
185
184
183
182
325
326
253252 251
255
256
266
265
311
213
63 223
222
221
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
242
243
279
278
277
280
281
282
283
276
275
144
143
142
141
140
139
138
152
150
151
81 103
102
101
100
99 98
97 104
105
128129
126
127
1 2 34 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 121314
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23242526
27 28
29 30
31 32
33 34 35
47 48
49 3637
42 41
40 3839
50 51
52 53 54 55
72 71
70 69
68 585756
656667
59 60
61 62 63
64 79
80 86
85 87
88 89
90 91
9273
74 75
76 77
78 98
97 96
95 94
93 99
100
101
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
116
117
118
119
123
124
125
126
127128 129
130
131132133134135136
122
121
120
115
114
113
112
104103
102
84838281
143142141140139
138
137 144145146147148
149
150
46454443
189

FRANK SINATRA DRIVE
TR. NO. 37856

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL

FUTURE HOTEL

FUTURE TOWN CENTER
TR. NO. 38291

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL
188
FUTURE

RESIDENTIAL
190
FUTURE
191

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL

OR TOWN CENTER

RESIDENTIAL

OR TOWN
CENTER
FUTURE

BEACH CLUB
162
161160
159
166
165 164 163
170
169168
167
171
172
173174
180
179178177176175
187 186 185 184
183 182
181
154153152151
158 157 156 155
PA 2
PA 3
TC
PA 1
34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com
MSA CONSULTING, INC.
> PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING

RESIDENTIAL BUILDOUT STATUS
SECTION 31 / COTINO
APRIL 18, 2022
N.T.S.

NOTE:

THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXHIBIT IS TO TRACK THE RESIDENTIAL UNIT COUNT WITHIN SECTION 31 / COTINO

AS THE DESIGN IS REFINED THROUGH IMPLEMENTING TRACT MAPS AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANS TO ENSURE THAT THE ALLOWABLE 1,932 MAXIMUM UNITS IS NOT EXCEEDED.

RESIDENTIAL UNIT BALANCE

PLANNING AREA
PA 1
PA 2
PA 3
MAX. DU'S
PERMITTED1
% OVER/UNDER

PA ESTIMATE
DU'S

REMAINING
-
-
-
+5%
-
-
-
-
-
- TR. 37856---
- TR. 38291 (PORTION)---

TOTAL SP

DU'S ESTIMATED
PER PA
394
260
547
-
-
1,9321,418 - -
PA TC--86%- 731

ENTITLEMENT

APPROVALS
415
-
-
327
88 514
99 - TR. 38291 (PORTION)--- - 99
NOTE:

1. MAXIMUM DU'S APPLY ONLY ON A PROJECT LEVEL. PLANNING AREA DU'S ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. SEE SP CITATION BELOW. "CHANGES TO THE DISTRIBUTION, CONFIGURATION, AND LOCATION OF RESIDENTIAL UNITS WITHIN OR BETWEEN PLANNING AREAS IS PERMITTED PROVIDED THAT THE MAXIMUM 1,932 DWELLING UNITS ALLOWED BY THE SPECIFIC PLAN ARE NOT EXCEEDED AND THE GENERAL DENSITY STRUCTURE ON FIGURE 2.1, LAND USE PLAN, IS MAINTAINED." - PAGE 22 OF THE SECTION 31 SPECIFIC PLAN
LEGEND
Tract or PDP Boundary
SP Planning Area (PA) Boundary

SYMBOLDESCRIPTION
R:\2051\ACAD\Planning\Exhibits\Buildout\2051 Section 31 Residential Buildout Status.dwg, 4/18/2022 7:25:00 AM, dgallerani, MSA Consulting, Inc. 10-410

GERALD FORD DRIVE

BOB HOPE DRIVE

MONTEREY AVENUE

FRANK SINATRA DRIVE

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL
LAGOON

WELL SITE
TR. NO. 37856

FUTURE HOTEL

FUTURE TOWN CENTER
FUTURE TR. NO. 38291
FUTURE

RESIDENTIAL
FUTURE

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL

OR TOWN CENTER

RESIDENTIAL

OR TOWN
CENTER

BEACH CLUB
FUTURE

RESIDENTIAL
34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com
MSA CONSULTING, INC.
> PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING

OPEN SPACE BUILDOUT STATUS
SECTION 31 / COTINO
APRIL 18, 2022

OPEN SPACE
N.T.S.

SYMBOL
Residential Entry

DESCRIPTION
NOTE:

THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXHIBIT IT TO TRACK THE OPEN SPACE COMPONENTS THAT APPLY WITHIN SECTION 31 / COTINO AS THE DESIGN IS REFINED THROUGH IMPLEMENTING TRACT MAPS AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANS.

Paseo
Community Gateway
Landscaped Edge
Streetscape / Common Area
Neighborhood Parks
R:\2051\ACAD\Planning\Exhibits\Buildout\2051 Section 31 Open Space Buildout Status.dwg, 4/18/2022 7:23:43 AM, dgallerani, MSA Consulting, Inc. 10-411

GERALD FORD DRIVE

BOB HOPE DRIVE

MONTEREY AVENUE

FRANK SINATRA DRIVE

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL
LAGOON

WELL SITE
TR. NO. 37856

FUTURE HOTEL

FUTURE TOWN CENTER
FUTURE
TR. NO. 38291

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL
FUTURE

RESIDENTIAL
FUTURE

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL

OR TOWN CENTER

RESIDENTIAL

OR TOWN
CENTER

BEACH CLUB
34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com
MSA CONSULTING, INC.
> PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING

VEHICULAR CIRCULATION BUILDOUT STATUS
SECTION 31 / COTINO
APRIL 18, 2022

CIRCULATION
N.T.S.

STREET

TYPESYMBOL
A.1
A.4
B.1
-
Neighborhood Street: Lagoon
Neighborhood Street: Park / Landscaped Median
Neighborhood Local Street
Two-Way Laneway (Alley) / No Parking

DESCRIPTION
NOTE:

THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXHIBIT IT TO TRACK THE FINAL STREET ALIGNMENTS AND DESIGNATIONS THAT APPLY WITHIN SECTION 31 / COTINO AS THE DESIGN IS REFINED THROUGH IMPLEMENTING TRACT MAPS AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANS.

R:\2051\ACAD\Planning\Exhibits\Buildout\2051 Section 31 Vehicular Circulation Buildout Status.dwg, 4/18/2022 7:21:09 AM, dgallerani, MSA Consulting, Inc. 10-412

GERALD FORD DRIVE

BOB HOPE DRIVE

MONTEREY AVENUE

FRANK SINATRA DRIVE

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL
LAGOON

WELL SITE

FUTURE HOTEL

FUTURE TOWN CENTER
FUTURE TR. NO. 38291
FUTURE

RESIDENTIAL
FUTURE

FUTURE RESIDENTIAL

OR TOWN CENTER

RESIDENTIAL

OR TOWN
CENTER

BEACH CLUB
TR. NO. 37856
FUTURE

RESIDENTIAL
34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com
MSA CONSULTING, INC.
> PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING

MULTI-MODAL CIRCULATION BUILDOUT STATUS
SECTION 31 / COTINO
JUNE 8, 2022
N.T.S.

NOTE:

THE PURPOSE OF THIS EXHIBIT IT TO TRACK THE FINAL STREET ALIGNMENTS AND DESIGNATIONS THAT APPLY WITHIN SECTION 31 /COTINO AS THE DESIGN IS REFINED THROUGH IMPLEMENTING TRACT MAPS AND PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLANS.

MULTI-MODAL CIRCULATION

MULTI-USE CONNECTIVITY
Lagoon Multi-Use Corridor
Residential Multi-Use Path
Multi-Use Paseo
Paseo Path

SYMBOLDESCRIPTION
Landscaped Edge Multi-Use Path
NOTE:

IN ADDITION TO THE BACKBONE FACILITIES IDENTIFIED ABOVE, SIDEWALKS ARE ALSO PROVIDED ON BOTH SIDES OF LOCAL STREETS.

R:\2051\ACAD\Planning\Exhibits\Buildout\2051 Section 31 Multi-Modal Circulation Buildout Status.dwg, 6/8/2022 11:24:01 AM, dgallerani, MSA Consulting, Inc. 10-413
Cotino, Rancho Mirage
Phase 1B & 1C Concept Landscape Design
TTM 38291
MAY 27, 2022
ATTACHMENT 11
10-414
Table of Contents

1. Perimeter Landscape Page 3

2. Community Parks Page 14

3. T ypical Streetscape Planting Page 28

4. Feature Streetscapes Page 33

5. Plant Palette Page 36
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage February 15, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton. 10-415
Perimeter Landscape
10-416
600'
600' 1,200'
4 Lagoon
Enlargement 3Enlargement 3
Enlargement 1Enlargement 1
Gerald Ford Drive
Bob Hope Drive
Monterey Avenue
Frank Sinatra Drive
PRISMATIC BLVD.

PRISMATIC BLVD.

LARKSPUR

LARKSPUR
WAY

M A R I N E

M A R I N E
WAY

PURPLE IRIS

PURPLE IRIS
WAY

O R C H I D
FLOWER AVE.

FLOWER AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

MAJORELLE RD.

MAJORELLE RD.

AZURE SEA AVE.

AZURE SEA AVE.

VIOLET
VIOLET
VIOLET
VIOLET

VIEW WAY

VIEW WAY

VIEW WAY

HELIOTROPE

HELIOTROPE

HELIOTROPE
AVE.

R
A
D
I
A
N
C
E
D
R
.

C
O
R
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
R
D
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

S
E
A
H
O
L
L
Y
R
D
.

T
I
D
E
S
W
E
L
L
W
A
Y
B
B
L
L
U
U
E
E
O
O
A
A
S
S
I
I
S
S
D
D
R
R
.
.

D
A
N
U
B
E
D
R
.

C
E
R
U
L
E
A
N
S
T
.

T
H
I
S
T
L
E
B
U
S
H
C
T
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

A
Z
U
R
E
S
E
A
A
V
E
.

TEAL WATE

TEAL WATE
LN.

S C R U B

S C R U B
JAY LN.

JAY LN.

CHROMA BLVD.

CHROMA BLVD.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

P
L
U
M
S
T
.

R
A
D
D
D
D
I
A
N
C
E
D
R
.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

E
D
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TIDE PO0L
TIDE PO0L
WAY
WAY

M A U V E

M A U V E
LANE
LANE

H I B I S C U S

H I B I S C U S

H I B I S C U S

H I B I S C U S

H I B I S C U S

H I B I S C U S

H I B I S C U S

H I B I S C U S

H I B I S C U S

H I B I S C U S
BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

O
C
E
A
N
A
R
D
.

A
L
L
L
I
U
M
A
V
E
.

BLUE CORN

BLUE CORN
RD.

PRISMATIC BLVD.

PRISMATIC BLVD.

Enlargement 2Enlargement 2

WISTERIA

WISTERIA
VINE DR.

P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

P
R
R
I
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
D
D
.
.

BLUESTAR

BLUESTAR
LANE
C
O
N
E
E
F
L
O
W
E
R
R
L
L
L
TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

A
N
E
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Overall Perimeter Landscape Plan
10-417
5 PERIMETER AGGREGATE MULCH

TYPE MATERIAL
A DECOMPOSED GRANITE, BEIGE COLOR, MIXED WITH DESERT ROCK (3"-4") B DARK BROWN ROCK, 1"-2"
C COARSE ROCK, BEIGE COLOR (2"-4")
D DARK BROWN GRAVEL, 1"-2"
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20%
15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon
• Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in
combination with live plants
• All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD
approved irrigation system, with trees/shrubs on separate systems

2. Landscape lighting (walls, feature plantings), to be consistent with Dark Sky principles.

3. Perimeter wall layout is conceptual.

PERIMETER TREES AND PALMS

NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE T1 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 24" BOX LOW 0.2
T2 CERCIDIUM PRAECOX PALO BREA 36" BOX LOW 0.2
T3 OLEA EUROPEA SWAN HILL FRUITLESS EUROPEAN OLIVE 24" BOX LOW 0.2 T4 PROSOPIS CHILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE 24" BOX LOW 0.2
T5 WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 14'-18' BTH MOD 0.5 T6 YUCCA ELATA SOAPTREE YUCCA 36" BOX LOW 0.2
T7 OLNEYA TESOTA DESERT IRONWOOD 36" BOX LOW 0.2

PERIMETER SHRUBS

NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE S1 AGAVE AMERICANA CENTURY PLANT 5 GAL. VERY LOW 0.1
S2 YUCCA BACCATA BANANA YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S3 AGAVE PARRYI 'TRUNCATA' PARRY'S AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S4 AGAVE VICTORIA-REGINAE QUEEN VICTORIA AGAVE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S5 AGAVE DESMETTIANA SMOOTH AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S6 ALOE BREVIFOLIA SHORT-LEAVED ALOE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
S7 ALOE 'HERCULES' HERCULES ALOE 36" BOX LOW 0.2
S8 PACHYCEREUS PRINGLEI MEXICAN GIANT CACTUS 36" BOX LOW 0.2 S9 CALLIANDRA CALIFORNICA BAJA FAIRY DUSTER 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S10 CEREUS MARGINATA MEXICAN FENCE POST 7'-9' HT. VERY LOW 0.1 S11 DALEA FRUTESCENS 'SIERRA NEGRA' BLACK DALEA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S12 ECHINOCACTUS GRUSSONII GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S13 EREMOPHILA HYGOPHORA BLUE BELLS BLUE BELL BUSH 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S14 EREMOPHILA MACULATA 'VALENTINE' RED EMU BUSH 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S15 EUPHORBIA ANTISYPHILITICA CANDELILLA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S16 FOUQUIERA MACDOUGALII MEXICAN OCOTILLO 7'-8' HT. MOD 0.5 S17 HESPERALOE CAMPANULATA BELL-FLOWERED YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S18 HESPERALOE FUNIFERA GIANT HESPERALOE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S19 OPUNTIA AUREA GOLDEN PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S20 OPUNTIA MICRODASYS BUNNY EARS CACTUS 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S21 OPUNTIA VIOLACEA PURPLE PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S22 SPHAGNETICOLA TRILOBATA BAY BISCAYNE 1 GAL. MOD 0.5 S23 YUCCA RECURVIFOLIA SOFT LEAF YUCCA 5 GAL. MOD 0.5
S24 HESPERALOE 'MSWN NUEVO LEON' LIONHEART 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S25 OPUNTIA AUREA 'COOMBE'S WINTER
GLOW' COOMBE'S WINTER GLOW 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S26 AGAVE MURPHEYI 'RODNEY' VARIEGATED MURPHY'S AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S27 GLANDULARIA GOODDINGII MOJAVE VERBENA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S28 ECHINOPSIS TERSCHECKII CARDON CACTUS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S29 HESPERALOE 'SANDIA GLOW' SANDIA GLOW RED YUCCA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S30 HESPERALOE 'DESERT FLAMENCO' DESERT FLAMENCO RED YUCCA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S31 AGAVE FRANZOSINII MAJESTIC AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
7' high wall with
painted plaster finish
Typical concrete multi-use
path (8' wide, natural light
gray, light broom finish)
Lot boundary
CC
AA
CC
BB
BB
CC
AA
S2S2
S23S23
S9S9
T1T1
S3S3
S23S23
S1S1
S9S9
S23S23
S12S12
S23S23
S15S15
T2T2
Key Plan
NTS
GERALD FORD DR.

GERALD FORD DR.

AZURE SEA AVE.

AZURE SEA AVE.

ALLIUM AVE.

ALLIUM AVE.

B
L
U
E
O
A
S
I
S
D
R
.

WISTERIA VINE DR.

WISTERIA VINE DR.

Phase 1B
Phase 1A
Wellsite
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Enlargement 1
10-418
6 PERIMETER AGGREGATE MULCH

TYPE MATERIAL
A DECOMPOSED GRANITE, BEIGE COLOR, MIXED WITH DESERT ROCK (3"-4") B DARK BROWN ROCK, 1"-2"
C COARSE ROCK, BEIGE COLOR (2"-4")
D DARK BROWN GRAVEL, 1"-2"
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20%
15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon
• Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in
combination with live plants
• All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD
approved irrigation system, with trees/shrubs on separate systems

2. Landscape lighting (walls, feature plantings), to be consistent with Dark Sky principles.

3. Perimeter wall layout is conceptual.

PERIMETER TREES AND PALMS

NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE T1 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 24" BOX LOW 0.2
T2 CERCIDIUM PRAECOX PALO BREA 36" BOX LOW 0.2
T3 OLEA EUROPEA SWAN HILL FRUITLESS EUROPEAN OLIVE 24" BOX LOW 0.2 T4 PROSOPIS CHILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE 24" BOX LOW 0.2
T5 WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 14'-18' BTH MOD 0.5 T6 YUCCA ELATA SOAPTREE YUCCA 36" BOX LOW 0.2
T7 OLNEYA TESOTA DESERT IRONWOOD 36" BOX LOW 0.2

PERIMETER SHRUBS

NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE S1 AGAVE AMERICANA CENTURY PLANT 5 GAL. VERY LOW 0.1
S2 YUCCA BACCATA BANANA YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S3 AGAVE PARRYI 'TRUNCATA' PARRY'S AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S4 AGAVE VICTORIA-REGINAE QUEEN VICTORIA AGAVE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S5 AGAVE DESMETTIANA SMOOTH AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S6 ALOE BREVIFOLIA SHORT-LEAVED ALOE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
S7 ALOE 'HERCULES' HERCULES ALOE 36" BOX LOW 0.2
S8 PACHYCEREUS PRINGLEI MEXICAN GIANT CACTUS 36" BOX LOW 0.2 S9 CALLIANDRA CALIFORNICA BAJA FAIRY DUSTER 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S10 CEREUS MARGINATA MEXICAN FENCE POST 7'-9' HT. VERY LOW 0.1 S11 DALEA FRUTESCENS 'SIERRA NEGRA' BLACK DALEA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S12 ECHINOCACTUS GRUSSONII GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S13 EREMOPHILA HYGOPHORA BLUE BELLS BLUE BELL BUSH 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S14 EREMOPHILA MACULATA 'VALENTINE' RED EMU BUSH 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S15 EUPHORBIA ANTISYPHILITICA CANDELILLA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S16 FOUQUIERA MACDOUGALII MEXICAN OCOTILLO 7'-8' HT. MOD 0.5 S17 HESPERALOE CAMPANULATA BELL-FLOWERED YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S18 HESPERALOE FUNIFERA GIANT HESPERALOE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S19 OPUNTIA AUREA GOLDEN PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S20 OPUNTIA MICRODASYS BUNNY EARS CACTUS 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S21 OPUNTIA VIOLACEA PURPLE PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S22 SPHAGNETICOLA TRILOBATA BAY BISCAYNE 1 GAL. MOD 0.5 S23 YUCCA RECURVIFOLIA SOFT LEAF YUCCA 5 GAL. MOD 0.5
S24 HESPERALOE 'MSWN NUEVO LEON' LIONHEART 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S25 OPUNTIA AUREA 'COOMBE'S WINTER
GLOW' COOMBE'S WINTER GLOW 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S26 AGAVE MURPHEYI 'RODNEY' VARIEGATED MURPHY'S AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S27 GLANDULARIA GOODDINGII MOJAVE VERBENA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S28 ECHINOPSIS TERSCHECKII CARDON CACTUS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S29 HESPERALOE 'SANDIA GLOW' SANDIA GLOW RED YUCCA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S30 HESPERALOE 'DESERT FLAMENCO' DESERT FLAMENCO RED YUCCA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S31 AGAVE FRANZOSINII MAJESTIC AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
Wellsite
CC
CC
BB
AA
CC
BB
CC
AA
BB
T2T2
S15S15
S3S3
S3S3
S2S2
S1S1
S23S23
S18S18
S18S18
S23S23
T4T4
T3T3
S15S15
S5S5
T2T2
T7T7
S3S3
S18S18
S14S14
S15S15
S6S6
S1S1
S12S12
T1T1
S23S23
7' high wall with
painted plaster finish
Proposed temporary access
driveway with gate & Knox Box
See Enlargement 3
Lot boundary
Typical concrete multi-use path (8' wide,
natural light gray, light broom finish)
GERALD FORD DR.

GERALD FORD DR.

BLUE OASIS DR.

BLUE OASIS DR.

PRISMATIC BLVD.

PRISMATIC BLVD.

MONTEREY AVE.

MONTEREY AVE.

A
Z
U
R
E
S
E
A
A
V
E
.

Town Center
Phase 1B
NTS
Key Plan
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Enlargement 2
10-419
7 PERIMETER AGGREGATE MULCH

TYPE MATERIAL
A DECOMPOSED GRANITE, BEIGE COLOR, MIXED WITH DESERT ROCK (3"-4") B DARK BROWN ROCK, 1"-2"
C COARSE ROCK, BEIGE COLOR (2"-4")
D DARK BROWN GRAVEL, 1"-2"
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20%
15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon
• Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in
combination with live plants
• All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD
approved irrigation system, with trees/shrubs on separate systems

2. Landscape lighting (walls, feature plantings), to be consistent with Dark Sky principles.

3. Perimeter wall layout is conceptual.

PERIMETER TREES AND PALMS

NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE T1 CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE 24" BOX LOW 0.2
T2 CERCIDIUM PRAECOX PALO BREA 36" BOX LOW 0.2
T3 OLEA EUROPEA SWAN HILL FRUITLESS EUROPEAN OLIVE 24" BOX LOW 0.2 T4 PROSOPIS CHILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE 24" BOX LOW 0.2
T5 WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 14'-18' BTH MOD 0.5 T6 YUCCA ELATA SOAPTREE YUCCA 36" BOX LOW 0.2
T7 OLNEYA TESOTA DESERT IRONWOOD 36" BOX LOW 0.2

PERIMETER SHRUBS

NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE S1 AGAVE AMERICANA CENTURY PLANT 5 GAL. VERY LOW 0.1
S2 YUCCA BACCATA BANANA YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S3 AGAVE PARRYI 'TRUNCATA' PARRY'S AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S4 AGAVE VICTORIA-REGINAE QUEEN VICTORIA AGAVE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S5 AGAVE DESMETTIANA SMOOTH AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S6 ALOE BREVIFOLIA SHORT-LEAVED ALOE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
S7 ALOE 'HERCULES' HERCULES ALOE 36" BOX LOW 0.2
S8 PACHYCEREUS PRINGLEI MEXICAN GIANT CACTUS 36" BOX LOW 0.2 S9 CALLIANDRA CALIFORNICA BAJA FAIRY DUSTER 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S10 CEREUS MARGINATA MEXICAN FENCE POST 7'-9' HT. VERY LOW 0.1 S11 DALEA FRUTESCENS 'SIERRA NEGRA' BLACK DALEA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S12 ECHINOCACTUS GRUSSONII GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S13 EREMOPHILA HYGOPHORA BLUE BELLS BLUE BELL BUSH 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S14 EREMOPHILA MACULATA 'VALENTINE' RED EMU BUSH 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S15 EUPHORBIA ANTISYPHILITICA CANDELILLA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S16 FOUQUIERA MACDOUGALII MEXICAN OCOTILLO 7'-8' HT. MOD 0.5 S17 HESPERALOE CAMPANULATA BELL-FLOWERED YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S18 HESPERALOE FUNIFERA GIANT HESPERALOE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S19 OPUNTIA AUREA GOLDEN PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S20 OPUNTIA MICRODASYS BUNNY EARS CACTUS 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S21 OPUNTIA VIOLACEA PURPLE PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S22 SPHAGNETICOLA TRILOBATA BAY BISCAYNE 1 GAL. MOD 0.5 S23 YUCCA RECURVIFOLIA SOFT LEAF YUCCA 5 GAL. MOD 0.5
S24 HESPERALOE 'MSWN NUEVO LEON' LIONHEART 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S25 OPUNTIA AUREA 'COOMBE'S WINTER
GLOW' COOMBE'S WINTER GLOW 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S26 AGAVE MURPHEYI 'RODNEY' VARIEGATED MURPHY'S AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S27 GLANDULARIA GOODDINGII MOJAVE VERBENA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S28 ECHINOPSIS TERSCHECKII CARDON CACTUS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S29 HESPERALOE 'SANDIA GLOW' SANDIA GLOW RED YUCCA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S30 HESPERALOE 'DESERT FLAMENCO' DESERT FLAMENCO RED YUCCA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S31 AGAVE FRANZOSINII MAJESTIC AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
CC
Key Plan
NTS
GERALD FORD DR.

GERALD FORD DR.

MONTEREY AVE.

MONTEREY AVE.

B
L
U
E
O
A
S
I
S
D
R
.
/
P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
D
.

BB
BB
DD
S23S23
S3S3
S3S3
S28S28
S8S8
S31S31
S12S12
S12S12
S15S15
S15S15
S18S18
S6S6
S6S6
S29S29
S30S30
T1T1
T1T1
T4T4
T5T5
7' high wall with
painted plaster finish
Lot boundary
B
Typical concrete multi-use path
(8' wide, natural gray, light
broom finish)
Feature Desert
Landscape with
Accent Uplighting
painted plaster finish
3' Berm
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Enlargement 3
10-420
8 A
Key Plan
NTS
Typical view looking east along
Gerald Ford Drive showing
blocks of desert trees, shrub
planting, and boundary wall
configuration.

Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

View A - Gerald Ford Drive
10-421
9 Key Plan
NTS
View looking south from the
corner of Gerald Ford Drive
and Monterey Avenue showing
feature desert landscape at
corner.

B
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

View B - Northeast Corner
10-422
10 Detail view of typical planting
and wall strategy along Monterey
Avenue showing tree and shrub
planting and wall foundation
planting.

C
Key Plan
NTS
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

View C - Monterey Avenue Detail
10-423
11 Perimeter Wall Reference Images
Accent Wall Color 1
DONALD KAUFMAN DCK-98
Primary Wall Color
DONALD KAUFMAN DCK-31
Inset Wall Color
DONALD KAUFMAN DCK-50
Accent Wall Color 2
DONALD KAUFMAN DCK-26
Note: Final paint formula/pigmentation for mock-up to be reviewed by Hart Howerton and a selected colorist.

Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Perimeter Wall Colors
10-424
12 2'-4‘ Offset
7‘-0“
Inset Wall Color
Primary Wall Color
Wall base planting
Foreground plantingProperty line
Accent Color
(Varies)
Typical Boundary Wall Palette
Accent Color 1
2'-4‘ Offset
7‘-0“
Inset Wall Color
Primary Wall Color
Wall base planting
Foreground plantingProperty line
Accent Color
(Varies)
Typical Boundary Wall Palette
Accent Color 2
Note: Final paint formula/pigmentation for mock-up to be reviewed by Hart Howerton and a selected colorist.

Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Perimeter Wall Colors
10-425
Typical Vehicular Gate ViewTypical Vehicular Gate View
Proposed CVWD Wellsite Vehicular Gate Reference Image: Proposed CVWD Wellsite Vehicular Gate Reference Image:

Opaque Panels, Height to Match Wall (~7FT Height)Opaque Panels, Height to Match Wall (~7FT Height) 13 7‘-0“7‘-0“
Two-leaf automatic swinging metal Two-leaf automatic swinging metal gate (manual swing gate with Knox gate (manual swing gate with Knox Box at temporary EV access)Box at temporary EV access)
Proposed Vehicular Gate Reference ImagesProposed Vehicular Gate Reference Images Existing Sunnylands Entry Gate Reference ImagesExisting Sunnylands Entry Gate Reference Images Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Wellsite Vehicular Gate Reference
10-426
Community Parks
10-427
15 Clubhouse
ResortLagoon
Paseo 2
Paseo 4
Park 20
Paseo 3
Park 15
Park 18
Paseo 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Town
Center
NOTE: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY.

SUBJECT TO FURTHER REFINEMENT
WITH MASTER DEVELOPER.

Phase 1A
Phase 1B
Phase
1C
Paseo 5
P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

BLUESTAR

BLUESTAR
LANE
O
N
E
F
L
O
W
E
R
L
A
N
E
P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

LARKSPUR

LARKSPUR
WAY

M A R I N E

M A R I N E
WAY
GERALD FORD DR.

GERALD FORD DR.

BOB HOPE DR.

BOB HOPE DR.

MONTEREY AVE.

MONTEREY AVE.

PURPLE IRIS

PURPLE IRIS
WAY
Park 18

O R C H I D
FLOWER AVE.

FLOWER AVE.

Park 18
FLOWER AVE.

Park 18
FLOWER AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

MAJORELLE RD.

MAJORELLE RD.

AZURE SEA AVE.

AZURE SEA AVE.

VIOLET
VIOLET

VIEW WAY

VIEW WAY

HELIOTROPE

HELIOTROPE
AVE.

R
A
D
I
A
N
C
E
D
R
.

C
O
R
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
R
D
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

S
E
A
H
O
L
L
Y
R
D
.

T
I
D
E
S
W
E
L
L
W
A
Y
B
B
L
L
U
U
E
E
O
O
A
A
S
S
I
I
S
S
D
D
R
R
.
.

D
A
N
U
B
E
D
R
.

C
E
R
U
L
E
A
N
S
T
.

T
H
I
S
T
L
E
B
U
S
H
C
T
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

A
Z
U
R
E
S
E
A
A
V
E
.

B
L
U
E
C
O
R
N
R
D
.
1C
P
R
I

TEAL WATER

TEAL WATER
LN.

Phase

S C R U B

S C R U B
JAY LN.

JAY LN.

CHROMA BLVD.

CHROMA BLVD.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

P
L
U
M
S
T
.

R
A
D
I
A
N
C
E
L
E
L
O
E
O
D
R
.

C
O
BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

L
A
E
R
N
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

L

TIDE POOL

TIDE POOL
WAY
WAY

H I B I SC U S
BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

M A U V E

M A U V E
LANE
LANE
O
C
E
A
N
A
R
D
.

A
L
L
I
U
M
A
V
E
.

P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

WISTERIA

WISTERIA
VINE DR.

Landscape Design Pending
(to be designed and
submitted in correlation
with Clubhouse landscape
and PDP)
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Phase 1B + 1C Overall Park Plan
10-428
5-MINUTEWALK
16 Phase 2
Phase 3
Town
Center
NOTE: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY.

SUBJECT TO FURTHER REFINEMENT
WITH MASTER DEVELOPER.

Lagoon
Phase 1A
Resort
Paseo 4
Park 20
Paseo 3
Park 15
Park 18
Paseo 1
Paseo 2
Paseo 5
Phase 1B
Phase
1C
P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

BLUESTAR

BLUESTAR
LANE
O
N
E
F
L
O
W
E
R
L
A
N
E
P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

LARKSPUR

LARKSPUR

LARKSPUR
WAY

M A R I N E

M A R I N E
WAY
GERALD FORD DR.

GERALD FORD DR.

BOB HOPE DR.

BOB HOPE DR.

MONTEREY AVE.

MONTEREY AVE.

PURPLE IRIS

PURPLE IRIS
WAY
Park 18

O R C H I D
FLOWER AVE.

FLOWER AVE.

Park 18
FLOWER AVE.

Park 18
FLOWER AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

MAJORELLE RD.

MAJORELLE RD.

MAJORELLE RD.

AZURE SEA AVE.

AZURE SEA AVE.

VIOLET
VIOLET

VIEW WAY

VIEW WAY

HELIOTROPE

HELIOTROPE
AVE.

R
A
D
I
A
N
C
E
D
R
.

C
O
R
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
R
D
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

S
E
A
H
O
L
L
Y
R
D
.

T
I
D
E
S
W
E
L
L
W
A
Y
B
B
L
L
U
U
E
E
O
O
A
A
S
S
I
I
S
S
D
D
R
R
.
.

D
A
N
U
B
E
D
R
.

C
E
R
U
L
E
A
N
S
T
.

T
H
I
S
T
L
E
B
U
S
H
C
T
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
D
R
R
.

A
Z
U
R
E
S
E
A
A
V
5 V
5 E
5 E
5 .
-
.
-
B
L
U
E
C
O
R
N
R
D
.
1C
P
R

TEAL WATER

TEAL WATER
LN.

Phase

S C R U B

S C R U B
JAY LN.

JAY LN.

CHROMA BLVD.

CHROMA BLVD.

CHROMA BLVD.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

P
L
U
M
S
T
.

R
A
D
I
A
N
C
E
L
E
L
O
E
O
D
R
.

C
O
BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

L
A
E
R
N
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

L

TIDE POOL

TIDE POOL

TIDE POOL
WAY
WAY
WAY

H I B I SC U S
BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

M A U V E

M A U V E
LANE
LANE
O
C
E
A
N
A
R
D
.

A
L
L
I
U
M
A
V
E
.

P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

WISTERIA

WISTERIA
VINE DR.

Clubhouse
Landscape Design Pending
(to be designed and
submitted in correlation
with Clubhouse landscape
and PDP)
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Phase 1B + 1C 5-Minute Walk Diagram
10-429
17 Lawn AreaPhase 2
Phase 3
Town
Center
NOTE: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY.

SUBJECT TO FURTHER REFINEMENT
WITH MASTER DEVELOPER.

Lagoon
Phase 1A
Resort
Phase 1B
Phase
1C
5,500 SF
4,300 SF
P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.
.

BLUESTAR

BLUESTAR
LANE
O
N
E
F
L
O
W
E
R
L
A
N
E
E
P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

LARKSPUR

LARKSPUR
WAY

M A R I N E

M A R I N E
WAY
GERALD FORD DR.

GERALD FORD DR.

BOB HOPE DR.

BOB HOPE DR.

MONTEREY AVE.

MONTEREY AVE.

PURPLE IRIS

PURPLE IRIS
WAY

O R C H I D
FLOWER AVE.

FLOWER AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

MAJORELLE RD.

MAJORELLE RD.

AZURE SEA AVE.

AZURE SEA AVE.

VIOLET
VIOLET

VIEW WAY

VIEW WAY

HELIOTROPE

HELIOTROPE
AVE.

R
A
D
I
A
N
C
E
D
R
.

C
O
R
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
R
D
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

S
E
A
H
O
L
L
Y
R
D
.

T
I
D
E
S
W
E
L
L
W
A
Y
B
B
L
L
U
U
E
E
O
O
A
A
S
S
I
I
S
S
D
D
R
R
.
.

D
A
N
U
B
E
D
R
.

C
E
R
U
L
E
A
N
S
T
.

T
H
I
S
T
L
E
B
U
S
H
C
T
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

A
Z
U
R
E
S
E
A
A
V
E
.

B
L
U
E
C
O
R
N
R
D
.
1C
5,500 SF
5,500 SF
5,500 SF
5,500 SF
P
R

TEAL WATER

TEAL WATER
5,500 SF

TEAL WATER
5,500 SF
LN.

Phase

S C R U B

S C R U B
JAY LN.

JAY LN.

CHROMA BLVD.

CHROMA BLVD.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

P
L
U
M
S
T
.

R
A
D
I
A
N
C
E
L
E
L
O
E
O
D
R
.

C
O
BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

L
A
E
R
N
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

L

TIDE POOL

TIDE POOL
WAY
WAY

H I B I SC U S
BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

M A U V E

M A U V E
LANE
LANE
O
C
E
A
N
A
R
D
.

A
L
L
I
U
M
A
V
E
.

P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

WISTERIA

WISTERIA
VINE DR.

Clubhouse
Landscape Design Pending
(to be designed and
submitted in correlation
with Clubhouse landscape
and PDP)
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Phase 1B + 1C Park Allowable Lawn Area Diagram
10-430
18 Lawn
Dog Park
Sculptural Element
PP Cart Parking
BB Bike Parking
M Mailbox KioskPhase 2
Phase 3
Town
Center
NOTE: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY.

SUBJECT TO FURTHER REFINEMENT
WITH MASTER DEVELOPER.

PP
PP
BB
BB
BB
Lagoon
Phase 1A
Resort
M
M
M
PP
Phase 1B
Phase
1C
Landscape Design Pending
(to be designed and
submitted in correlation
with Clubhouse landscape
and PDP)
P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

BLUESTAR

BLUESTAR
LANE
O
N
E
F
L
O
W
E
R
L
A
N
E
E
P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

LARKSPUR

LARKSPUR
WAY

M A R I N E

M A R I N E
WAY
GERALD FORD DR.

GERALD FORD DR.

BOB HOPE DR.

BOB HOPE DR.

MONTEREY AVE.

MONTEREY AVE.

PURPLE IRIS

PURPLE IRIS
WAY

O R C H I D
FLOWER AVE.

FLOWER AVE.

Landscape Design Pending
BRILLIANCE AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

MAJORELLE RD.

MAJORELLE RD.

AZURE SEA AVE.

AZURE SEA AVE.

VIOLET
VIOLET

VIEW WAY

VIEW WAY

HELIOTROPE

HELIOTROPE
AVE.

R
A
D
I
A
N
C
E
D
R
.

C
O
R
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
R
D
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

S
E
A
H
O
L
L
Y
R
D
.
(to be designed and
T
(to be designed and
I
(to be designed and
I
(to be designed and
D
(to be designed and
D
(to be designed and
submitted in correlation
D
submitted in correlation
E
submitted in correlation
E
submitted in correlation
submitted in correlation
S
submitted in correlation
W
submitted in correlation
W
submitted in correlation
E
submitted in correlation
E
submitted in correlation
with Clubhouse landscape
E
with Clubhouse landscape
L
with Clubhouse landscape
L
with Clubhouse landscape
L
with Clubhouse landscape
L
with Clubhouse landscape
with Clubhouse landscape
W
with Clubhouse landscape
A
with Clubhouse landscape
A
with Clubhouse landscape
Y
with Clubhouse landscape
Y
with Clubhouse landscape
B
B
L
L
U
U
E
E
O
O
A
A
S
S
I
I
S
S
D
D
R
R
.
.

D
A
N
U
B
E
D
R
.

C
E
R
U
L
E
A
N
S
T
.

T
H
I
S
T
L
E
B
U
S
H
C
T
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

A
Z
U
R
E
S
E
A
A
V
E
.

B
L
U
E
C
O
R
N
R
D
.
1C
P
R

TEAL WATER

TEAL WATER
LN.

Phase

S C R U B

S C R U B
JAY LN.

JAY LN.

CHROMA BLVD.

CHROMA BLVD.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

P
L
U
M
S
T
.

R
A
D
I
A
N
C
E
L
E
L
O
E
O
D
R
.

C
O
BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

L
A
E
R
N
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

L

TIDE POOL

TIDE POOL
WAY
WAY

H I B I SC U S
BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

M A U V E

M A U V E
LANE
LANE
O
C
E
A
N
A
R
D
.

A
L
L
I
U
M
A
V
E
.

P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

WISTERIA

WISTERIA
VINE DR.

Clubhouse
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Phase 1B + 1C Park Facilities Diagram
10-431
19 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE

TREES AND PALMS
OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' FRUITLESS EUROPEAN OLIVE 36" BOX LOW 0.2 PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA 'THORNLESS' THORNLESS HONEY MESQUITE 24" BOX LOW 0.2 SHRUBS
AGAVE DESMETTIANA SMOOTH AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
ALOE BARBADENSIS ALOE VERA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
EREMOPHILA HYGROPHANA 'BLUE BELLS' BLUE BELLS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 RUELLIA PENINSULARIS DESERT RUELLIA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
GROUNDCOVERS, PERENNIALS, ETC.

LAWN BERMUDA CULTIVAR SOD HIGH
PAVING
PAVING TYPE D DARK BROWN GRAVEL 1"-2" -
PAVING TYPE E BUFF / BEIGE GRAVEL 3/8" -
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20% 15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon • Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in combination with live plants • All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD approved irrigation system, with lawns and trees/shrubs on separate systems

2. Lighting: Activity Areas and feature plantings will be illuminated consistent with Dark Sky principles. 1 Activity Lawn
2 Olive Grove
3 Mesquite Accent Trees
4 Groundplane Planting (agaves,
aloes, and shrubs in geometric
patterns, contrasting color gravel
accent at agaves)
5 Bench Seating (2 total)
6 Concrete Walking Paths
(integral color, sand finish, saw cut
joints)
7 Mailbox Kiosk
1 2
3 4
5 NOTE: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY.

SUBJECT TO FURTHER REFINEMENT
WITH MASTER DEVELOPER.

Key Plan
NTS
B
L
U
E
O
A
S
I
S
D
R
.

P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

A
Z
U
R
E
S
E
A
A
V
E
.

H
I
B
I
S
C
U
S
B
E
R
R
Y
A
V
E
.
6 1

RESIDENCES

RESIDENCES
DD
EE
7 Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Park 15 Plan
10-432
20 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE

TREES AND PALMS
BRAHEA CLARA CLARA BLUE PALM 8' BTH MOD / MED 0.5
CITRUS SPP . VARIETIES TBD (SEMI-DWARF) 24" BOX MOD / MED 0.5 OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' FRUITLESS EUROPEAN OLIVE 36" BOX LOW 0.2 SHRUBS
A LO E SPP. ALOE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA DAMIANITA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
ECHINOCACTUS GRUSSONII GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 GLANDULARIA GOODDINGII MOJAVE VERBENA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
HESPERALOE CAMPANULATA BELL FLOWER YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 GROUNDCOVERS, PERENNIALS, ETC.

BOUGAINVILLEA 'JAMAICA WHITE' JAMAICA WHITE
BOUGAINVILLEA STAKED MOD / MED 0.5

BOUGAINVILLEA 'TAHITIAN DAWN' TAHITIAN DAWN
BOUGAINVILLEA STAKED MOD / MED 0.5
DALEA CAPITATA 'SIERRA GOLD' SIERRA GOLD DALEA 1 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5 DALEA GREGGII TRAILING INDIGIO BUSH 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
PAVING
PAVING TYPE E BUFF / BEIGE GRAVEL 3/8" -
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20% 15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon
• Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in combination with live plants • All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD approved irrigation system, with lawns and trees/shrubs on separate systems

2. Lighting: Activity Areas and feature plantings will be illuminated consistent with Dark Sky principles.
1 Paseo Trail (8' width, shared bike
and pedestrian connection to lagoon
trail, integral color concrete, sand
finish, saw cut joints)
2 Olive, Citrus & Palm Allée
(repeating pattern of edible citrus
varieties and palms)
3 Groundplane Planting (mixture
of desert specimens and shrubs with
gridded patterns of barrel cactus
and flowering vines on courtyard
walls)
4 Residential Entry Paths (4'
wide concrete path, integral color
with sand finish, final location TBD)
5 Trash & Dog Waste
Receptacles and Bottle
Filling Station
6 Connection To Alleys
2 1
Key Plan
NTS
NOTE: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY.

SUBJECT TO FURTHER REFINEMENT
WITH MASTER DEVELOPER.

B
L
U
E
O
A
S
I
S
D
R
.

O
C
E
A
N
A
R
D
.

C
O
N
E
F
L
O
W
E
R
L
N
.

LUPINE LN.

LUPINE LN.
2 2
3 3
3 3
5 4
4 4
4 4
4 4
6 6

RESIDENCES

RESIDENCES
EE
EE
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Paseo 1 Plan
10-433
21 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE

TREES AND PALMS
BRAHEA CLARA CLARA BLUE PALM 8' BTH MOD / MED 0.5
CITRUS SPP . VARIETIES TBD (SEMI-DWARF) 24" BOX MOD / MED 0.5 SHRUBS
A LO E SPP. ALOE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA DAMIANITA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
ECHINOCACTUS GRUSSONII GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 GLANDULARIA GOODDINGII MOJAVE VERBENA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
HESPERALOE CAMPANULATA BELL FLOWER YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 GROUNDCOVERS, PERENNIALS, ETC.

BOUGAINVILLEA 'JAMAICA WHITE' JAMAICA WHITE
BOUGAINVILLEA STAKED MOD / MED 0.5

BOUGAINVILLEA 'TAHITIAN DAWN' TAHITIAN DAWN
BOUGAINVILLEA STAKED MOD / MED 0.5
DALEA CAPITATA 'SIERRA GOLD' SIERRA GOLD DALEA 1 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5 DALEA GREGGII TRAILING INDIGIO BUSH 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
PAVING
PAVING TYPE E BUFF / BEIGE GRAVEL 3/8" -

PAVING TYPE G BUFF / BEIGE STABILIZED
DECOMPOSED GRANITE 1/4" MINUS -
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20% 15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon • Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in combination with live plants • All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD approved irrigation system, with lawns and trees/shrubs on separate systems

2. Lighting: Activity Areas and feature plantings will be illuminated consistent with Dark Sky principles. 1 Paseo Trail (8' width, integral
color concrete, sand finish, saw cut
joints)
2 Citrus & Palm Allée (repeating
pattern of edible citrus varieties and
palms)
3 Groundplane Planting (mixture
of desert specimens and shrubs with
gridded patterns of barrel cactus
and flowering vines on courtyard
walls)
4 Trash & Dog Waste
Receptacles and Bottle
Filling Station
5 Portal Connection To
Lagoon Promenade
6 Cart Parking
(5-6 carts, stabilized
decomposed granite paving with
concrete header)
7 Bike Parking (10-12 bikes,
steel loop bike racks, stabilized
decomposed granite paving with
concrete header)
8 Stair (8' width, integral color
concrete, sand finish, saw cut joints,
steel handrails, and 18" ht. concrete
cheek walls)
1 2
3 NOTE: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY.

SUBJECT TO FURTHER REFINEMENT
WITH MASTER DEVELOPER.

Key Plan
NTS
P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

L
A
G
O
O
N
T
R
A
I
L
2 3
5 4
6 7
8 CONDOS
CONDOS
EE
GG
EE
GG
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Paseo 2 Plan
10-434
22 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE

TREES AND PALMS
BRAHEA CLARA CLARA BLUE PALM 8' BTH MOD / MED 0.5
CITRUS SPP . VARIETIES TBD (SEMI-DWARF) 24" BOX MOD / MED 0.5 SHRUBS
A LO E SPP. ALOE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA DAMIANITA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
ECHINOCACTUS GRUSSONII GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 GLANDULARIA GOODDINGII MOJAVE VERBENA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
HESPERALOE CAMPANULATA BELL FLOWER YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 GROUNDCOVERS, PERENNIALS, ETC.

BOUGAINVILLEA 'JAMAICA WHITE' JAMAICA WHITE
BOUGAINVILLEA STAKED MOD / MED 0.5

BOUGAINVILLEA 'TAHITIAN DAWN' TAHITIAN DAWN
BOUGAINVILLEA STAKED MOD / MED 0.5
DALEA CAPITATA 'SIERRA GOLD' SIERRA GOLD DALEA 1 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5 DALEA GREGGII TRAILING INDIGIO BUSH 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
PAVING
PAVING TYPE E BUFF / BEIGE GRAVEL 3/8" -

PAVING TYPE G BUFF / BEIGE STABILIZED
DECOMPOSED GRANITE 1/4" MINUS -
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20% 15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon • Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in combination with live plants • All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD approved irrigation system, with lawns and trees/shrubs on separate systems

2. Lighting: Activity Areas and feature plantings will be illuminated consistent with Dark Sky principles. 1 Paseo Trail (8' width, integral color concrete, sand finish, saw cut joints) 2 Citrus & Palm Allée (repeating pattern of edible citrus varieties and palms) 3 Groundplane Planting (mixture of desert specimens and shrubs with gridded patterns of barrel cactus and flowering vines on courtyard walls) 4 Trash & Dog Waste Receptacles and Bottle Filling Station 5 Portal Connection To Lagoon Promenade
6 Cart Parking (5-6 carts, stabilized decomposed granite paving with concrete header) 7 Bike Parking (10-12 bikes, steel loop bike racks, stabilized decomposed granite paving with concrete header)
8 Stair (8' width, integral color concrete, sand finish, saw cut joints, steel handrails, and 18" ht. concrete cheek walls)
3 NOTE: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY.

SUBJECT TO FURTHER REFINEMENT
WITH MASTER DEVELOPER.

Key Plan
NTS
P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

L
A
G
O
O
N
T
R
A
I
L
1 2
3 7
8 6
4 5
CONDOS
CONDOS
EE
GG
GG
EE
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Paseo 3 Plan
10-435
23 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE

TREES AND PALMS
CAESALPINIA CACALACO CASCALOTE 24" BOX LOW 0.2
OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' FRUITLESS EUROPEAN OLIVE 36" BOX LOW 0.2 TIPUANA TIPU TIPU TREE 36" BOX MOD / MED 0.5
SHRUBS
ALOE BARBADENSIS ALOE VERA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
GLANDULARIA GOODDINGII MOJAVE VERBENA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
EREMOPHILA HYGROPHANA 'BLUE BELLS' BLUE BELLS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 YUCCA RECURVIFOLIA SOFT LEAF YUCCA 5 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5 GROUNDCOVERS, PERENNIALS, ETC.

DALEA GREGGII TRAILING INDIGO BUSH 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA PINE MUHLY 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
PAVING
PAVING TYPE E BUFF / BEIGE GRAVEL 3/8" -

PAVING TYPE F BUFF / BEIGE DECOMPOSED
GRANITE 1/4" MINUS -

PAVING TYPE G BUFF / BEIGE STABILIZED
DECOMPOSED GRANITE 1/4" MINUS -
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20% 15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon • Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in combination with live plants • All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD approved irrigation system, with lawns and trees/shrubs on separate systems

2. Lighting: Activity Areas and feature plantings will be illuminated consistent with Dark Sky principles. 1 Blue Oasis Walking Trail (10’
width)
2 Groundplane Planting (border
planting of Yucca, grasses, and
groundcover; grove understory of
shrubs, aloes and groundcover)
3 Feature Tree
4 Sculptural Play Mounds (play
surface, teal color)
5 Shade Awning at Play Area
(fabric post-mounted shade awning)
6 Bench Seating (5 total)
7 Olive Grove (with flexible
furnishings)
8 Post Mount Light (2 total)
9 Mailbox Kiosk
10 Trash & Dog Waste
Receptacles
11 Drinking Fountain / Bottle
Filling Station
12 Bollard Light
(~35FT O.C.)
NOTE: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY.

SUBJECT TO FURTHER REFINEMENT
WITH MASTER DEVELOPER.

Key Plan
NTS

RESIDENCES

RESIDENCES

RESIDENCES

RESIDENCES

RESIDENCES

RESIDENCES
B
L
U
E
O
A
S
I
S
D
R
.

PLUM ST.

RADIANCE DR.
1 7
8 9
6 5
11 4
12 4
10 2
GG
FF
EE
EE
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Park 18 Plan
10-436
24 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE

TREES AND PALMS
OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' FRUITLESS EUROPEAN OLIVE 36" BOX LOW 0.2 QUERCUS SUBER CORK OAK 36" BOX LOW 0.2
SHRUBS
AGAVE MURPHEYI MURPHY'S AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
CEREUS HILDMANNIANUS HILDMANN'S CEREUS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
GLANDULARIA GOODDINGII MOJAVE VERBENA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2

LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS
'SILVERADO' TEXAS SAGE 5 GAL. LOW / MOD 0.5
OPUNTIA MICRODASYS 'BUNNY' BUNNY EARS PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. VERY LOW 0.1 PACHYCEREUS MARGINATUS FENCE POST CACTUS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 GROUNDCOVERS, PERENNIALS, ETC.

HYMENOXYS ACAULIS ANGELITA DAISY 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
OENOTHERA CAESPITOSA WHITE EVENING PRIMROSE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2

LAWN BERMUDA CULTIVAR SOD HIGH
PAVING
PAVING TYPE E BUFF / BEIGE GRAVEL 3/8" -
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20% 15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon • Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in combination with live plants • All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD approved irrigation system, with lawns and trees/shrubs on separate systems

2. Lighting: Activity Areas and feature plantings will be illuminated consistent with Dark Sky principles. 1 Activity Lawn
2 Olive Grove with Bird Bath Basin / Bubbler (sculptural element) 3 Cork Oak Accent Tree
4 Groundplane Planting (agave, prickly pear cactus, shrubs, and desert specimens) 5 Bench Seating (4 total)
6 Concrete Walking Path (8' width, shared bike and pedestrian connection to lagoon trail, integral color, sand finish, saw cut joints)
7 Residential Entry Paths (4' wide concrete stepping pads, integral color with sand finish and 3" wide gravel joints, final location TBD)
8 Connection to Paseo
9 Mailbox Kiosk
1 2
3 4
NOTE: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY.

SUBJECT TO FURTHER REFINEMENT
WITH MASTER DEVELOPER.

Key Plan
NTS
B
L
U
E
O
A
S
I
S
D
R
.

M
A
R
I
N
E
W
A
Y
BLUE CORN RD.

BLUE CORN RD.

MARINE WAY

MARINE WAY
TEAL WATER LN.

TEAL WATER LN.
4 5
5 8
6 6
7 RESIDENCES

RESIDENCES
4 6
EE
EE
EE
EE
9 Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Park 20 Plan
10-437
25 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE

TREES AND PALMS
BRAHEA CLARA CLARA BLUE PALM 8' BTH MOD / MED 0.5
OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' FRUITLESS EUROPEAN OLIVE 36" BOX LOW 0.2 SHRUBS
A LO E SPP. ALOE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA DAMIANITA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
ECHINOCACTUS GRUSSONII GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 GLANDULARIA GOODDINGII MOJAVE VERBENA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
HESPERALOE CAMPANULATA BELL FLOWER YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 GROUNDCOVERS, PERENNIALS, ETC.

BOUGAINVILLEA 'JAMAICA WHITE' JAMAICA WHITE

BOUGAINVILLEA STAKED MOD / MED

BOUGAINVILLEA 'TAHITIAN DAWN' TAHITIAN DAWN

BOUGAINVILLEA STAKED MOD / MED
DALEA CAPITATA 'SIERRA GOLD' SIERRA GOLD DALEA 1 GAL. MOD / MED DALEA GREGGII TRAILING INDIGIO BUSH 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
PAVING
PAVING TYPE E BUFF / BEIGE GRAVEL 3/8" -
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20% 15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon • Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in combination with live plants • All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD approved irrigation system, with lawns and trees/shrubs on separate systems

2. Lighting: Activity Areas and feature plantings will be illuminated consistent with Dark Sky principles. 1 Paseo Trail (8' width, integral
color concrete, sand finish, saw cut
joints)
2 Olive Tree Allée (repeating
pattern of edible citrus varieties and
palms)
3 Groundplane Planting (mixture
of desert specimens and shrubs with
gridded patterns of barrel cactus
and flowering vines on courtyard
walls)
4 Trash & Dog Waste
Receptacles and Bottle
Filling Station
5 Connection To Park
6 Connection To Alley
NOTE: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY.

SUBJECT TO FURTHER REFINEMENT
WITH MASTER DEVELOPER.

Key Plan
NTS
BLUE CORN RD.

BLUE CORN RD.

M
A
R
I
N
E
W
A
Y
4 3
3 2
2 1
5 5
6 RESIDENCES
CONDOS
EE
EE
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Paseo 4 Plan
10-438
26 BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE

TREES AND PALMS
BRAHEA CLARA CLARA BLUE PALM 8' BTH MOD / MED 0.5
CAESALPINIA CACALACO CASCALOTE 24" BOX LOW 0.2
EBENOPSIS EBANO TEXAS EBONY 24" BOX LOW 0.2
OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' FRUITLESS EUROPEAN OLIVE 36" BOX LOW 0.2 PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA 'THORNLESS' THORNLESS HONEY MESQUITE 24" BOX LOW 0.2 TIPUANA TIPU TIPU TREE 36" BOX MOD / MED 0.5
SHRUBS
A LO E SPP. ALOE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA DAMIANITA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
ECHINOCACTUS GRUSSONII GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 GLANDULARIA GOODDINGII MOJAVE VERBENA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
HESPERALOE CAMPANULATA BELL FLOWER YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 YUCCA RECURVIFOLIA SOFT LEAF YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE
GROUNDCOVERS, PERENNIALS, ETC.

BOUTELOUA DACTYLOIDES BUFFALO GRASS 1 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5 DALEA CAPITATA 'SIERRA GOLD' SIERRA GOLD DALEA 1 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5 DALEA GREGGII TRAILING INDIGO BUSH 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA PINE MUHLY 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
GRAVEL
PAVING TYPE E BUFF / BEIGE GRAVEL 3/8" -

PAVING TYPE F BUFF / BEIGE DECOMPOSED
GRANITE 1/4" MINUS -

PAVING TYPE G BUFF / BEIGE STABILIZED
DECOMPOSED GRANITE 1/4" MINUS -
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20% 15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon
• Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in combination with live plants
• All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD approved irrigation system, w ith lawns and trees/shrubs on separate systems

2. Lighting: Activity Areas and feature plantings will be illuminated consistent with Dark Sky principles.
1 Lagoon Trail Connector (10' width, integral color concrete, sand finish, saw cut joints)
2 Trees and Groundplane Planting (shade and understory of succulents, grasses, and shrubs in massings outside of dog fence, mix of organic and geometric patterns along lagoon trail connector) 3 Dog Park Entry Gate (gated vestibule, 5' wide swing gates) 4 Fence (4' height vinyl coated chain link fence, dark color) 5 Concrete Walking Paths (integral color, sand finish, saw cut joints)
6 Dog Drinking Fountain
7 Large Dog Play Area (decomposed granite, minimal planting) 8 Small Dog Play Area (separate fenced area for small dogs) 9 Seating Areas (18" built-in concrete seat wall, benches, picnic tables, and low tables/stools for dog play)
10 Trash & Dog Waste Receptacles and Bottle Filling
Station
11 Light TBD
12 Cart and Bike Parking
(4-6 carts, 10-12 bikes, stabilized
decomposed granite with concrete header)
13 Portal Connection To Lagoon Promenade
7 NOTE: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN ONLY.

SUBJECT TO FURTHER REFINEMENT
WITH MASTER DEVELOPER.

Key Plan
NTS
B
L
U
E
O
A
S
I
S
D
R
.

L
A
G
O
O
N
T
R
A
I
L
BLUE CORN RD.

BLUE CORN RD.

C H R O M A

C H R O M A
BLVD.
2 7
1 4
4 3
5 1
2 2
4 4
4 4
13 12
12 3
3 5
5 6
6 8
9 9
9 9
10 10
10 11
11 DETENTION BASIN

RESIDENCES
CONDOS
CONDOS
PHASE 2
FF
EE
GG
EE
FF
EE
EE
EE
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Paseo 5 Plan
10-439
Typical Streetscape Planting
10-440
28 TREES

NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE
T1 CERCIDIUM PRAECOX PALO BREA 36" BOX LOW 0.2
T2
(PHASE IA
ONLY)

CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM
'THORNLESS HYBRID AZT' PALO VERDE 36" BOX LOW 0.2
T3

PROSOPIS CHILENSIS
'THORNLESS'

THORNLESS CHILEAN
MESQUITE 36" BOX LOW 0.2
T4

PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA
'THORNLESS'

THORNLESS HONEY
MESQUITE 36" BOX LOW 0.2
T4
T5

PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA
'THORNLESS'

TIPUANA TIPU

THORNLESS HONEY

MESQUITE

TIPU TREE
36" BOX
36" BOX
LOW 0.2

MOD / MED

0.5 NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20% 15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon
• Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in combination with live plants • All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD approved irrigation system, with lawns and trees/ shrubs on separate systems
Phase 2
Town
Center
Phase 3
Lagoon
Phase 1A
P
P
M
M
A
A
T
T
I
I
C
C
B
B
L
L
V
V
D
D
.
.

BLUESTAR

BLUESTAR
LANE
O
N
E
F
L
O
W
E
R
L
A
N
E
P
P
R
R
I
I
S
S
M
M
A
A
T
T
I
I
C
C
B
B
L
L
V
V
D
.

LARKSPUR

LARKSPUR
WAY

M A R I N E

M A R I N E
WAY
GERALD FORD DR.

GERALD FORD DR.

BOB HOPE DR.

BOB HOPE DR.

MONTEREY AVE.

MONTEREY AVE.

PURPLE IRIS

PURPLE IRIS
WAY

O R C H I D
FLOWER AVE.

FLOWER AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

MAJORELLE RD.

MAJORELLE RD.

AZURE SEA AVE.

AZURE SEA AVE.

VIOLET
VIOLET

VIEW WAY

VIEW WAY

HELIOTROPE

HELIOTROPE
AVE.

R
A
D
I
A
N
C
E
D
R
.

C
O
R
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
R
D
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

S
E
A
H
O
L
L
Y
R
D
.

T
I
D
E
S
W
E
L
L
W
A
Y
B
BB
L
L
L
L
U
U
E
EE
O
OO
A
AA
S
S
I
I
I
I
S
SS
D
DD
R
RR
.
.

D
A
N
U
B
E
D
R
.

C
E
R
U
L
E
A
N
S
T
.

T
H
I
S
T
L
E
B
U
S
H
C
T
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

A
Z
U
R
E
S
E
A
A
V
E
.

B
L
U
E
C
O
R
N
R
D
.

P
P
R
R
I
I
S
S
M
M
A

TEAL WATER

TEAL WATER

TEAL WATER
R

TEAL WATER
R
R

TEAL WATER
R
I

TEAL WATER
I
I

TEAL WATER
I
LN.

S C R U B

S C R U B
JAY LN.

JAY LN.

CHROMA BLVD.

CHROMA BLVD.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

P
P
L
L
U
U
M
M
S
S
T
T.

R
R
A
A
D
D
I
I
A
AA
N
N
C
C
E
E
L
E
L
O
E
O
D
D
R
R
.

C
O
BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

P
P
R
R
I
I
S
S
M
M
A
A
T
T
I
I
C
C
B
L
V
V
D
D
.
.

L
A
E
R
N
N
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

L

TIDE POOL

TIDE POOL

TIDE POOL

TIDE POOL
WAY
WAY

H I B I SC U S

H I B I SC U S
BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

M A U V E

M A U V E

M A U V E

M A U V E
LANE
LANE
O
C
E
A
N
A
R
D
.
.

A
A
L
L
L
L
I
I
U
U
M
M
A
A
V
V
E
E
.
..

P
PP
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
C
B
B
L
L
V
V
D
.

WISTERIA

WISTERIA

WISTERIA

WISTERIA

WISTERIA
VINE DR.

VINE DR.

VINE DR.

Landscape Design Pending
(to be designed and
submitted in correlation
with Clubhouse landscape
and PDP)
Clubhouse
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Phase 1B + 1C Street Trees
10-441
29 Streetscape Palette A
Streetscape Palette B
Clubhouse
Phase 2
Phase 3
Town
Center
Lagoon
Phase 1A
Resort
Landscape Design Pending
(to be designed and
submitted in correlation
with Clubhouse landscape
and PDP)
P
P
M
M
A
A
T
T
I
I
C
C
B
B
L
L
V
V
D
D
.
.

BLUESTAR

BLUESTAR
LANE
O
N
E
F
L
O
W
E
R
L
A
N
E
P
P
R
R
I
I
S
S
M
M
A
A
T
T
I
I
C
C
B
B
L
L
V
V
D
.

LARKSPUR

LARKSPUR
WAY

M A R I N E

M A R I N E
WAY
GERALD FORD DR.

GERALD FORD DR.

BOB HOPE DR.

BOB HOPE DR.

MONTEREY AVE.

MONTEREY AVE.

PURPLE IRIS

PURPLE IRIS
WAY

O R C H I D
FLOWER AVE.

FLOWER AVE.

Landscape Design Pending
BRILLIANCE AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

BRILLIANCE AVE.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

JACARANDA TREE CT.

MAJORELLE RD.

MAJORELLE RD.

AZURE SEA AVE.

AZURE SEA AVE.

VIOLET
VIOLET

VIEW WAY

VIEW WAY

HELIOTROPE

HELIOTROPE
AVE.

R
A
D
I
A
N
C
E
D
R
.

C
O
R
N
F
L
O
W
E
R
R
D
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

S
E
A
H
O
L
L
Y
R
D
.

T
(to be designed and
T
(to be designed and
(to be designed and
I
(to be designed and
(to be designed and
D
(to be designed and
E
(to be designed and
E
(to be designed and
S
(to be designed and
S
(to be designed and
submitted in correlation
S
submitted in correlation
W
submitted in correlation
W
submitted in correlation
submitted in correlation
E
submitted in correlation
L
submitted in correlation
L
submitted in correlation
L
submitted in correlation
L
submitted in correlation
W
with Clubhouse landscape
W
with Clubhouse landscape
with Clubhouse landscape
A
with Clubhouse landscape
with Clubhouse landscape
Y
with Clubhouse landscape
B
BB
L
L
L
L
U
U
E
EE
O
OO
A
AA
S
S
I
I
I
I
S
SS
D
DD
R
RR
.
.

D
A
N
U
B
E
D
R
.

C
E
R
U
L
E
A
N
S
T
.

T
H
I
S
T
L
E
B
U
S
H
C
T
.

H
A
R
M
O
N
I
O
U
S
D
R
.

A
Z
U
R
E
S
E
A
A
V
E
.

B
L
U
E
C
O
R
N
R
D
.

P
P
R
R
I
I
S
S
M
M
A

TEAL WATER

TEAL WATER

TEAL WATER
R

TEAL WATER
R
R

TEAL WATER
R
I

TEAL WATER
I
I

TEAL WATER
I
LN.

S C R U B

S C R U B
JAY LN.

JAY LN.

CHROMA BLVD.

CHROMA BLVD.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

ULTRAMARINE LN.

P
P
L
L
U
U
M
M
S
S
T
T.

R
R
A
A
D
D
I
I
A
A
N
N
C
C
E
E
L
E
L
O
E
O
D
D
R
R
.

C
O
BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

BELLFLOWER LN.

P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
B
L
V
D
.

L
A
E
R
N
N
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

TYRIAN LN.

L
TYRIAN LN.

L

TIDE POOL

TIDE POOL

TIDE POOL

TIDE POOL
WAY
WAY

H I B I SC U S
BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

BERRY AVE.

M A U V E

M A U V E

M A U V E

M A U V E
LANE
LANE
O
C
E
A
N
A
R
D
.
.

A
A
L
L
L
L
I
I
U
U
M
M
A
A
V
V
E
E
.

P
P
R
I
S
M
A
T
I
C
C
B
B
L
L
V
V
D
.

WISTERIA

WISTERIA

WISTERIA

WISTERIA

WISTERIA
VINE DR.

VINE DR.

VINE DR.

Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Phase 1B + 1C Streetscape Shrub and Groundcover Palettes 10-442
30 PALETTE TYPE A SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS

NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE S1 AGAVE BRACTEOSA SQUID AGAVE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
S2 AGAVE STRICTA HEDGEHOG AGAVE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
S3 AGAVE X 'BLUE GLOW' BLUE GLOW AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
S4 ALOE BREVIFOLIA SHORT LEAVED ALOE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
S5 ALOE FEROX CAPE ALOE 15 GAL. LOW 0.2
S6 VERBENA RIGIDA VARIEGATED PULCHELLA MOSS VERBENA 1 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5 S7 CALLIANDRA X 'SIERRA STAR' BAJA RED FAIRY DUSTER 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S8 HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 'PERPA' MOUNTAIN STATES RED YUCCA 2 GAL. LOW 0.2 S9 PEDILANTHUS MACROCARPUS SLIPPER PLANT 1 OR 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S10 YUCCA PALLIDA PALE LEAF YUCCA 1 OR 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20% 15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon • Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in combination with live plants • All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD approved irrigation system, with lawns and trees/shrubs on separate systems S3S3
S1S1
S2S2
S5S5
S4S4
S10S10
S8S8
S7S7
S6S6
S9S9
S4S4
Sidewalk
Street
Street tree
No irrigation zone
aggregate mulch, Beige
Tan Color, 1"-2" size
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Streetscape Shrub and Groundcover Palette A
10-443
31 PALETTE TYPE B SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVERS

NUMBER BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE S11 AGAVE DESMETTIANA 'VARIEGATA' VARIEGATED SMOOTH AGAVE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S12 AGAVE STRICTA HEDGEHOG AGAVE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
S13 BERLANDIERA LYRATA CHOCOLATE FLOWER 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
S14 TAGETES LUCIDA MEXICAN TARRAGON 5 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5 S15 ZINNIA GRANDIFLORA PRAIRIE ZINNIA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
S16 OENOTHERA CAESPITOSA WHITE EVENING PRIMROSE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 S17 PEDILANTHUS MACROCARPUS SLIPPER PLANT 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 S18 PENSTEMON PARRYI PARRY'S PENSTEMON 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
NOTES

1. Design intent complies with Rancho Mirage Municipal Code landscape development standards:
• Minimum sizes: Trees 30% 36” box, 50% 24” box, 20% 15 gallon; Shrubs 60% 5 gallon, 40% 1 gallon • Inorganic aggregate groundcovers are used in combination with live plants • All landscaping areas shall have City and CVWD approved irrigation system, with lawns and trees/shrubs on separate systems S17S17
S16S16
S12S12
S14S14
S13S13
S15S15
S18S18
S16S16
S11S11
Sidewalk
Street
Street tree
No irrigation zone
aggregate mulch, Beige
Tan Color, 1"-2" size
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Streetscape Shrub and Groundcover Palette B
10-444
Feature Streetscapes
10-445
33 D
Key Plan
NTS
View looking northeast along
Blue Oasis Drive showing
feature tree planting.

Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

View D - Blue Oasis Drive View
10-446
34 E
Key Plan
NTS
View looking southeast along
Brilliance Avenue showing
feature street and median
planting.

Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

View E - Brilliance Ave View
10-447
Plant Palette
10-448
36 TREES & PALMS

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE
BRAHEA CLARA CLARA BLUE PALM *8' BTH MOD / MED 0.5
CAESALPINIA CACALACO CASCALOTE 24" BOX LOW 0.2
CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM BLUE PALO VERDE *24" OR 36"
BOX LOW 0.2
CERCIDIUM PRAECOX PALO BREA *36" OR 48"
BOX LOW 0.2
CITRUS SPP . VARIETIES TBD (SEMI-DWARF) 24" BOX MOD / MED 0.5 EBENOPSIS EBANO TEXAS EBONY 24" BOX LOW 0.2
OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' FRUITLESS EUROPEAN OLIVE 24" OR 36" BOX LOW 0.2
OLNEYA TESOTA DESERT IRONWOOD *36" BOX LOW 0.2
PROSOPIS CHILENSIS CHILEAN MESQUITE 24" BOX LOW 0.2

PROSOPIS CHILENSIS 'THORNLESS'

THORNLESS CHILEAN
MESQUITE 36" BOX LOW 0.2
PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA 'THORNLESS' THORNLESS HONEY MESQUITE *24" OR 36" BOX LOW 0.2
QUERCUS SUBER CORK OAK *36" BOX LOW 0.2
TIPUANA TIPU TIPU TREE *36" BOX MOD / MED 0.5
WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM *14'-18' BTH MOD / MED 0.5 YUCCA ELATA SOAPTREE YUCCA *36" BOX LOW 0.2
SHRUBS

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE
AGAVE AMERICANA CENTURY PLANT 5 GAL. VERY LOW 0.1
AGAVE BRACTEOSA SQUID AGAVE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
AGAVE DESMETTIANA SMOOTH AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
AGAVE DESMETTIANA 'VARIEGATA' VARIEGATED SMOOTH AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 AGAVE MURPHEYI MURPHY'S AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
AGAVE MURPHEYI 'RODNEY' VARIEGATED MURPHY'S AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 AGAVE PARRYI 'TRUNCATA' PARRY'S AGAVE 1 OR 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 AGAVE STRICTA HEDGEHOG AGAVE 1 OR 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
AGAVE VICTORIAE-REGINAE QUEEN VICTORIA AGAVE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 AGAVE X 'BLUE GLOW' BLUE GLOW AGAVE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
ALOE BARBADENSIS ALOE VERA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
ALOE BREVIFOLIA SHORT LEAVED ALOE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
ALOE FEROX CAPE ALOE 5 OR 15
GAL. LOW 0.2
ALOE 'HERCULES' HERCULES ALOE *36" BOX LOW 0.2
ASCLEPIAS SUBULATA DESERT MILKWEED 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
BERLANDIERA LYRATA CHOCOLATE FLOWER 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
CALLIANDRA CALIFORNICA BAJA FAIRY DUSTER 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 CALLIANDRA X 'SIERRA STAR' BAJA RED FAIRY DUSTER 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 CEREUS HILDMANNIANUS HILDMANN'S CEREUS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA DAMIANITA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
DALEA FRUTESCENS 'SIERRA NEGRA' BLACK DALEA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 ECHINOCACTUS GRUSSONII GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 EREMOPHILA HYGROPHANA 'BLUE BELLS' BLUE BELLS 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 EREMOPHILA MACULATA 'VALENTINE' RED EMU BUSH 5 GAL. LOW 0.2 EUPHORBIA RESINIFERA MOROCCAN MOUND 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
FOUQUIERIA MACDOUGALII MEXICAN OCOTILLO 7'-8' HT. LOW 0.2 GLANDULARIA GOODDINGII MOJAVE VERBENA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
HESPERALOE CAMPANULATA BELL FLOWER YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2

HESPERALOE CAMPANULATA 'MSWN NUEVO
LEON' LIONHEART 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
HESPERALOE FUNIFERA GIANT HESPERALOE 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 'PERPA' MOUNTAIN STATES RED YUCCA 2 GAL. LOW 0.2 LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS 'SILVERADO' TEXAS SAGE 5 GAL. LOW / MOD 0.5 OENOTHERA CAESPITOSA WHITE EVENING PRIMROSE 1 GAL. LOW 0.2 OPUNTIA AUREA GOLDEN PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. VERY LOW 0.1
* Specimen trees, palms, and feature yuccas & aloes shall be locally-sourced and contract grown.

Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Plant Palette
10-449
37 PAVING & LAWN

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME
PAVING TYPE A DECOMPOSED GRANITE, BEIGE COLOR, MIXED WITH DESERT ROCK (5"-7") PAVING TYPE B DARK BROWN ROCK (1"-2")
PAVING TYPE C COARSE ROCK, BEIGE COLOR (3"-5")
PAVING TYPE D DARK BROWN GRAVEL (1"-2")
PAVING TYPE E BUFF / BEIGE GRAVEL (3/8")
PAVING TYPE F BUFF / BEIGE DECOMPOSED GRANITE (1/4" MINUS) PAVING TYPE G BUFF / BEIGE STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE (1/4" MINUS)

LAWN BERMUDA CULTIVAR (SOD FORM)
SHRUBS

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE
OPUNTIA AUREA 'COOMBE'S WINTER GLOW' COOMBE'S WINTER GLOW 5 GAL. VERY LOW 0.1 OPUNTIA MICRODASYS BUNNY EARS CACTUS 1 GAL. VERY LOW 0.1 OPUNTIA MICRODASYS 'BUNNY' BUNNY EARS PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. VERY LOW 0.1 OPUNTIA VIOLACEA PURPLE PRICKLY PEAR 5 GAL. VERY LOW 0.1 PACHYCEREUS MARGINATUS FENCE POST CACTUS 5 GAL. VERY LOW 0.1 PACHYCEREUS PRINGLEI MEXICAN GIANT CACTUS 36" BOX LOW 0.2 PEDILANTHUS MACROCARPUS SLIPPER PLANT 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
PENSTEMON PARRYI PARRY'S PENSTEMON 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
RUELLIA PENINSULARIS DESERT RUELLIA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
SPHAGNETICOLA TRILOBATA BAY BISCAYNE 1 GAL. MOD 0.5
TAGETES LUCIDA MEXICAN TARRAGON 5 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5
VERBENA RIGIDA VARIEGATED PULCHELLA MOSS VERBENA 1 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5 YUCCA BACCATA BANANA YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
YUCCA PALLIDA PALE LEAF YUCCA 5 GAL. LOW 0.2
YUCCA RECURVIFOLIA SOFT LEAF YUCCA 5 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5 ZINNIA GRANDIFLORA PRAIRIE ZINNIA 1 GAL. LOW 0.2

GROUNDCOVERS, PERENNIALS, ORNAMENTAL GRASSES & VINES

BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE WATER USE

BOUGAINVILLEA 'JAMAICA WHITE' JAMAICA WHITE
BOUGAINVILLEA STAKED MOD / MED 0.5

BOUGAINVILLEA 'TAHITIAN DAWN' TAHITIAN DAWN
BOUGAINVILLEA STAKED MOD / MED 0.5
BOUTELOUA DACTYLOIDES BUFFALO GRASS 1 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5 DALEA CAPITATA 'SIERRA GOLD' SIERRA GOLD DALEA 1 GAL. MOD / MED 0.5 DALEA GREGGII TRAILING INDIGO BUSH 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
HYMENOXYS ACAULIS ANGELITA DAISY 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA PINE MUHLY 1 GAL. LOW 0.2
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Plant Palette
10-450
38 CAESALPINIA CACALACO / CASCALOTE CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM / BLUE PALO VERDE CERCIDIUM PRAECOX / PALO BREA CITRUS SPP . / VARIETIES TBD (SEMI-DWARF) EBENOPSIS EBANO / TEXAS EBONY OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL ' / FRUITLESS EUROPEAN OLIVE Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Trees
10-451
39 OLNEYA TESOTA / DESERT IRONWOOD PROSOPIS CHILENSIS / CHILEAN MESQUITE PROSOPIS CHILENSIS 'THORNLESS' / THORNLESS CHILEAN

MESQUITE

PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA 'THORNLESS' / THORNLESS HONEY

MESQUITE

QUERCUS SUBER / CORK OAK TIPUANA TIPU / TIPU TREE
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Trees
10-452
40 BRAHEA CLARA / CLARA BLUE PALM WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA / CALIFORNIA FAN PALM YUCCA ELATA / SOAPTREE YUCCA Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Palms
10-453
41 AGAVE STRICTA / HEDGEHOG AGAVE

AGAVE AMERICANA / CENTURY PLANT

AGAVE MURPHEYI / MURPHY'S AGAVE

AGAVE BRACTEOSA / SQUID AGAVE

AGAVE MURPHEYI 'RODNEY' / VARIEGATED

MURPHY'S AGAVE

AGAVE DESMETTIANA / SMOOTH AGAVE

AGAVE PARRYI 'TRUNCATA' / PARRY'S AGAVE

AGAVE DESMETTIANA 'VARIEGATA' /

VARIEGATED SMOOTH AGAVE
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Shrubs
10-454
42 ALOE FEROX / CAPE ALOE

AGAVE VICTORIA-REGINAE / QUEEN VICTORIA
AGAVE

ALOE 'HERCULES' / HERCULES ALOE

AGAVE X 'BLUE GLOW' / BLUE GLOW AGAVE

ASCLEPIAS SUBULATA / DESERT MILKWEED

ALOE BARBADENSIS / ALOE VERA

BERLANDIERA LYRATA / CHOCOLATE FLOWER

ALOE BREVIFOLIA / SHORT-LEAVED ALOE
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Shrubs
10-455
43 CHRYSACTINIA MEXICANA / DAMIANITA

CALLIANDRA CALIFORNICA / BAJA FAIRY
DUSTER

DALEA FRUTESCENS 'SIERRA NEGRA' / BLACK
DALEA

CALLIANDRA X 'SIERRA STAR' / BAJA RED FAIRY
DUSTER

ECHINOCACTUS GRUSSONII / GOLDEN BARREL
CACTUS

CEREUS HILDMANNIANUS / HILDMANN'S CEREUS

EREMOPHILA HYGROPHANA 'BLUE BELLS' / BLUE
BELLS

CEREUS MARGINATA / MEXICAN FENCE POST
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Shrubs
10-456
44 HESPERALOE CAMPANULATA / BELL-FLOWERED
YUCCA

EREMOPHILA MACULATA 'VALENTINE' / RED EMU
BUSH

HESPERALOE CAMPANULATA 'MSWN NUEVO

LEON' / LIONHEART

EUPHORBIA RESINIFERA / MOROCCAN MOUND

HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA 'PERPA' / MOUNTAIN

STATES RED YUCCA

FOUQUIERA MACDOUGALII / MEXICAN

OCOTILLO

LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS 'SILVERADO' /

TEXAS SAGE

GLANDULARIA GOODDINGII / MOJAVE VERBENA
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Shrubs
10-457
45 OPUNTIA MICRODASYS 'BUNNY' / BUNNY EARS

PRICKLY PEAR

OENOTHERA CAESPITOSA / WHITE EVENING

PRIMROSE

OPUNTIA VIOLACEA / PURPLE PRICKLY PEAR

OPUNTIA AUREA / GOLDEN PRICKLY PEAR

PACHYCEREUS MARGINATUS / FENCE POST
CACTUS

OPUNTIA AUREA 'COOMBE'S WINTER GLOW' /

COOMBE'S WINTER GLOW

PACHYCEREUS PRINGLEI / MEXICAN GIANT
CACTUS

OPUNTIA MICRODASYS / BUNNY EARS CACTUS
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Shrubs
10-458
46 PEDILANTHUS MACROCARPUS /

SLIPPER PLANT

VERBENA RIGIDA VARIEGATED

PULCHELLA / MOSS VERBENA

PENSTEMON PARRYI / PARRY'S

PENSTEMON

YUCCA BACCATA / BANANA YUCCA

RUELLIA PENINSULARIS / DESERT

RUELLIA

YUCCA PALLIDA / PALE LEAF YUCCA YUCCA RECURVIFOLIA / SOFT LEAF YUCCA

ZINNIA GRANDIFLORA / PRAIRIE
ZINNIA

SPHAGNETICOLA TRILOBATA / BAY

BISCAYNE

TAGETES LUCIDA / MEXICAN

TARRAGON
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Shrubs
10-459
47 DALEA GREGGII / TRAILING INDIGO BUSH

BOUGAINVILLEA 'JAMAICA WHITE' / JAMAICA

WHITE BOUGAINVILLEA

HYMENOXYS ACAULIS / ANGELITA DAISY

BOUGAINVILLEA 'TAHITIAN DAWN' / TAHITIAN

DAWN BOUGAINVILLEA

BOUTELOUA DACTYLOIDES / BUFFALO GRASS

MUHLENBERGIA DUBIA / PINE MUHLY

DALEA CAPITATA 'SIERRA GOLD' / SIERRA GOLD
DALEA
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Groundcovers, Perennials, Ornamental Grasses & Vines
10-460
48 LAWNPAVING TYPE F / BUFF / BEIGE DECOMPOSED
GRANITE (1/4" MINUS)

PAVING TYPE G / BUFF / BEIGE STABILIZED
DECOMPOSED GRANITE (1/4" MINUS)

PAVING TYPE A / DECOMPOSED GRANITE, BEIGE
COLOR, MIXED WITH DESERT ROCK (5"-7")

PAVING TYPE E /
BUFF / BEIGE GRAVEL MULCH (3/8")
PAVING TYPE B / DARK BROWN ROCK, (1"-2") PAVING TYPE C / COARSE ROCK, BEIGE COLOR (3"-5")
PAVING TYPE D / DARK BROWN GRAVEL, (1"-2")
Project Stanley Rancho Mirage May 27, 2022
© 2019 HART HOWERTON. The designs and concepts shown are the sole property of Hart Howerton. The drawings may not be used except with the expressed written consent of Hart Howerton.

Paving & Lawn
10-461
11-1
TO:

FROM:

STAFF REPORT
Mayor and City Council
Jessica L. Pulliam, Sr. Management Analyst
Isaiah Hagerman, City Manager
DATE: September 1, 2022
SUBJECT: Support of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians' Position on Proposition 26 and 27

SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-(Next -in-Order), Declaring its Support of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians' Position of Yes on Proposition 26 and No on Proposition

27. JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION
BACKGROUND:

Since 2000, California tribal governments have operated Indian gaming casinos on their own tribal lands. The resources generated from gaming have allowed California tribes to provide services to include healthcare, schools, scholarships, cultural resource protection, fire and law enforcement services, water systems, environmental protection and more .

Through formal state compacts and agreements with local governments, tribal governments partner with neighboring cities and counties to address issues important to their communities and to provide direct funding to cities and counties. Tribal casinos also provide nearly 150,000 jobs, generate $26.9 billion for the California economy annually and attract visitors to their respective regions-ensuring money is spent at surrounding businesses and providing tax revenues to cities, counties, and other local governments .

The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) operates three local casinos to include the Agua Caliente Resort Casino Spa within the City of Rancho Mirage. ACBCI provides many direct contributions to the local community including providing many local jobs, scholarships, donating food, provided funding to support Rancho Mirage's fire and law enforcement and much more.

In May 2018, the United States Supreme Court eliminated the federal prohibition on sports wagering. As a result, states now have the freedom to authorize sports wagering within their jurisdictions and to establish regulations, consumer protections, responsible gambling measures and taxes on sports wagering. Already twenty states have moved to regulate and tax sports wagering in a manner that provides for consumer protections and responsible gambling.

AGENDA ITEM#
11-2
DATE: September 1, 2022 Page 2 of 3
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Unregulated and untaxed sports wagering is happening throughout California without any consumer or responsible gambling protections. Leading economists and industry experts estimate that during the federal prohibition on sports wagering, a thriving black market flourished with billions of dollars wagered annually across the United States. The illegal sports wagering market in California continues to thrive and will continue to be an attractive option due to its untaxed, unregulated, and unlicensed nature1.

On the ballot for consideration in November 2022 are two propositions related to the regulation of sports wagering, Proposition 26 and Proposition 27. Proposition 26 would allow sports wagering strictly in person with age verification at the experienced gaming facilities of Tribal governments and approved racetracks. Approved racetracks would be subject to a 10% tax on the daily total of sports wagers less the daily total of winnings by patrons. Whereas Proposition 27 would allow online and mobile sports wagering with a $100 million license fee for operators, which may include corporations that partner with a California Tribe, in addition to a 10% tax on gross online sports betting revenue.

Proposition 26 ensures that sports wagering is regulated and taxed, providing adults 21 and older who choose to participate in this activity an experienced gaming facility that is highly regulated and safe. There would be limitations to including a requirement to be physically present in a facility to place sport wagers, safeguarding against underage gambling, prohibiting marketing and advertisement of sports wagering to those younger than 21 years old, permitting of sports wagering only on professional, college or amateur or athletic events and the prohibiting of wagering on high school or athletic events to protect students amongst other things.

Proposition 26 would permit tribal governments to offer sport wagering, roulette and games played with dice within negotiated Tribal-state compacts, that provide revenues for state and local government services. Additionally, it would also allow approved racetrack operators the ability to offer sports wagering with a ten percent tax to fund programs related to problem gambling prevention and mental health (15% allocation) and the implementation and oversight of sports wagering and other forms of gaming (15% allocation) in addition to helping finance the state's general fund to support schools and other state priorities (70% allocation).

Proposition 27 also ensures sports wagering is regulated and taxed but, provides online and mobile access and the introduction of corporation partnerships within California gaming. There would be limitations to include modern technology, similar to financial institutions, utilized to safeguard against underage gambling, prohibiting marketing and advertisement of sports wagering to those younger than 21 years old, permitting of sports wagering only on professional, college or amateur or athletic events and the prohibiting of wagering on high school or athletic events.

Proposition 27 would permit corporations partnered with a California tribe, as well as a Tribe to independently offer sport wagering on an on line platform at the cost of a $100 million license 1 https://www.oag.ca.gov/system/files/initiatives/pdfs/19- 0029A1 %20 %28Sports %20Wagering %20 %26amp %3 B%20Gambling %29.pdf AGENDA ITEM#
11-3
DATE: September 1, 2022 Page 3 of 3
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:
fee, in addition to a 10% tax of gross on line sports betting revenues. 85% of the tax would be placed in a trust account to fund homelessness solutions and mental health priorities across California and 15% would be allocated to California Tribes not participating in the online marketplace.

INFORMATION:

The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) has approached the City of Rancho Mirage requesting the City's support on their position of Yes on Proposition 26 and No on Proposition

27. ACBCI is of the position that Proposition 26 will be a positive means to regulate sports wagering while increasing growth in the local economy while Proposition 27 would be harmful to them and many other California tribes and negatively impact the local economy with significant funding being profited by out of state corporations . Additionally Proposition 27 proposes hefty licensing fees and high costs associated with creating a competing online platform that would make market access be out of reach for many gaming Tribes.

ACBCI makes may direct contributions to the local community including providing scholarships, donating food, provided funding to support Rancho Mirage's fire and law enforcement, in addition to attracting visitors, generating many local jobs and much more. The City of Rancho Mirage has had a long-standing positive relationship with the Tribe.

RECOMMENDATION:

That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2022-(Next-in-Order), Declaring its Support of the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians' Position of Yes on Proposition 26 and No on Proposition

27. ATTACHMENT(S):

1. Resolution
AGENDA ITEM#
11-4
ATTACHMENT 1

RESOLUTION
(SEE ATTACHED)
11-5
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-- -

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE

DECLARING ITS SUPPORT OF THE AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS' POSITION OF YES ON PROPOSITION 26 AND NO ON PROPOSITION 27 WHEREAS, the City of Rancho Mirage ("City") is a charter city and recognized for certain purposes as a political subdivision of the State of California; and WHEREAS, California tribal governments lawfully and safely operate gaming casinos on tribal land; and ·
WHEREAS, tribal governments partner with neighboring cities and counties to address issues important to their communities, provide direct funding to cities and counties, provide nearly 150,000 jobs, generate $26.9 billion for the California economy annually and attract visitors to their respective regions-ensuring money is spent at surrounding businesses and providing tax revenues to cities, counties, and other local governments; and
WHEREAS, The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) operates three local casinos, one located within the City of Rancho Mirage, and provides many direct contributions to the local community including providing many local jobs, scholarships, donating food, provided funding to support Rancho Mirage's fire and law enforcement and much more; and
WHEREAS, on the November 2022 ballot is Propositions 26 which would allow sports wagering strictly in-person with age verification at the experienced gaming facilities of Tribal governments and approved racetracks, which would be subject to a 10% tax on the daily total of sports wagers less the daily total of winnings by patrons; and WHEREAS, also on the November 2022 ballot is Proposition 27 which would allow online and mobile sports wagering with a $100 million license fee for operators, which may include corporations that partner with a California Tribe, in addition to a 10% tax on gross online sports betting revenue; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes that Proposition 26 better serves the public good because it ensures that sports wagering is regulated and taxed, provides adults 21 and older who choose to participate in this activity an experienced gaming facility that is highly regulated and safe, and the in-person requirement safeguards against underage gambling, prohibits marketing and advertisement of sports wagering to those younger than 21 years old, permits sports wagering only on professional, college or amateur or athletic events and prohibits of wagering on high school athletic events to protect students; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 26 would permit tribal governments to offer sport wagering, roulette and games played with dice within negotiated Tribal-state compacts, that provide revenues for state and local government services to support regulation needs and educational programs; and
11-6
WHEREAS, Proposition 26 guarantees funding to prevent and treat problem gambling issues; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 27 contains none of the safeguards against underage gambling that are contained in Proposition 26, does not require or guarantee any revenues will be shared with local governments, and does not guarantee any funding for problem gambling treatment or prevention; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 26 is supported by the California District Attorneys Association, the Riverside Sheriff's Association, and many other public safety organizations; and
WHEREAS, the ACBCI has expressed support for Proposition 26, and opposition to Proposition 27, and has requested that the City Council also express support for the ACBCl's position on these ballot measures; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the City Council formally express support for Proposition 26, and opposition to Proposition 27 for the reasons set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Recitals.

That the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby incorporated herein by this reference.

Section 2. Support for Proposition 26 and Opposition to Proposition 27 The City Council supports the passage of Proposition 26, and opposes passage of Proposition 27, being proposed to the voters of the State of California as part of the November 2022 Election.

Section 3. Certification.

That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions.
[REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
11-7
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 1st day of September 2022.

CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
Charles Townsend, Mayor
ATTEST:

Kristie Ramos, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:

Steven B. Quintanilla, City Attorney
12-1

STAFF REPORT
TO: Mayor and City Council DATE: September 1, 2022
FROM: Kofi Antobam, Director of Administrative Services SUBJECT: Community Facilities District No. 4C (Del Webb Project) Special Tax Bonds, Series 2022

SPECIFIC REQUEST OR RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council approve Resolution No. 2022-(Next-in-Order) authorizing the issuance of not to exceed $7,500,000 aggregate principal amount of City of Rancho Mirage Community Facilities District No. 4C (Del Webb Project) Special Tax Bonds, Series 2022, approving the execution and delivery of an Indenture, a Bond Purchase Agreement, a Continuing Disclosure Agreement, and the preparation of an Official Statement and other matters related thereto.

JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION

BACKGROUND
The Del Webb at Rancho Mirage project (the "Project") is located west of Bob Hope Drive, north of Dinah Shore Drive, and east of Los Alamos Road. At build out, the Project is expected to include approximately 1,029 single family homes. The Project is being developed by Pulte Homes (the "Developer") as a 55+ year Age-Qualified gated community.

As specified in the Development Agreement between the City and Developer, dated November 4, 2016, the Developer is requesting the City to assist in the financing of approximately $23.3 million in public improvement costs and public infrastructure fees by forming three Community Facilities Districts (each, a "CFO" and collectively, "CFDs"). Three CFDs (4A, 4B, and 4C) are proposed due to the timing and complexities of Developer's acquisition of the Project site from the previous land owner. Public improvements and infrastructure fees include City public benefit fees, street improvements, utility undergrounding, and sewer and water infrastructure and fees (collectively, the "Facilities").

In 2019, the City issued Special Tax Bonds, Series 2019A for CFO No. 4A in the amount of $6,530,000. In 2021, The City issued Special Tax Bonds, Series 2021 for CFO No. 4B in the amount of $5,975,000. The City Council action item proposed today will authorize the sale of approximately $6.4 million in bonds and approve certain documents related to the bond issuance. This issuance of bonds for CFO No. 4C will be the final bond issuance for the Del Webb Project.

AGENDA ITEM#
12-2
DATE: September 1, 2022
CFD 4C Bonds
JUSTIFICATION OR INFORMATION CONTINUED:

Page 2 of 5 ends
← All documents from this meeting