include appropriate avoidance minimization, and mitigation measures. CDFW recommends adding the following mitigation measure:
MM BIO-3: Special-Status Plants
A thorough floristic-based assessment of special-status plants and natural communities, following CDFW's Protocols for Surveying and Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native Plant Populations and Natural Communities (CDFW 2018 or most recent version) shall be performed by a qualified biologist prior to commencing Project activities. Should any state-listed plant species be present in the Project area, the Project proponent shall obtain an Incidental Take Permit for those species not covered under the CVMSHCP prior to the start of Project activities.
Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia)
Burrowing owl is a California Species of Special Concern. Take of individual burrowing owls and their nests is defined by Fish and Game Code section 86, and prohibited by sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513. Fish and Game Code section 3513 makes it unlawful to take or possess any migratory nongame bird except as provided by rules and regulations adopted by the Secretary of the Interior under provisions of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 703 et seq.). Burrowing owl is a Covered Species under the CVMSHCP, which requires that avoidance and minimization measures be implemented for this species.
The MND (Appendices Table D-1) acknowledges that “the project site provides line-of- sight opportunities favored by burrowing owls.” Because the field assessment for the IS/MND is not recent and due to the potential for burrowing owl to move into disturbed sites, CDFW recommends that prior to commencing Project activities, surveys for burrowing owl be conducted by a qualified biologist in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent version). CDFW recommends the revised MND include specific avoidance and minimization measures to ensure that impacts to burrowing owls do not occur. CDFW recommends adding the following mitigation measure:
MM BIO-4: Burrowing Owl Surveys
No less than 30 days prior to the start of Project-related activities, a burrowing owl habitat assessment shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the specifications of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (Department of Fish and Game, March 2012 or most recent version).
If the habitat assessment demonstrates suitable burrowing owl habitat, then focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project Applicant shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures if avoidance is proposed. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable 9 10
4-408
Pilar Lopez, Associate Planner
City of Rancho Mirage
January 10, 2023
habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions. The Permittee shall implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW review and approval.
Pre-construction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project-related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent version). Pre-construction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the pre-construction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and USFWS to conduct an impact assessment to develop avoidance and minimization measures to be approved by CDFW prior to commencing Project activities.
Desert Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotis arsipus) and American Badger (Taxidea taxus) Desert kit fox is protected as a fur-bearing mammal under Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (Chap. 5, § 460) and may not be taken at any time. BIOS data layers showing connectivity modeling for the California Desert Linkage Network indicate that the Project site falls within high probability, core breeding habitat for kit fox. Because desert kit fox has high fidelity to natal dens, it is crucial to adequately assess whether desert kit fox is present on the Project site well in advance of commencing Project activities. If desert kit fox is found on-site during breeding season, it could delay Project activities for the length of the breeding season.
American badgers are listed as a California Species of Special Concern (SSC). BIOS data layers showing predicted habitat indicate that the Project site falls near highly likely, core foraging habitat for American badgers. American badgers are nocturnal, and it is crucial to adequately assess whether they are present on the Project site well in advance of commencing Project activities. If American badgers are found on-site during breeding season, it could delay Project activities for the length of the breeding season.
The MND (p. 33) states that “the Project site provides suitable foraging and denning habitat for mammalian species.” The MND also acknowledges that most mammal species are nocturnal and are difficult to observe during a diurnal field visit. CDFW is concerned that the timing and scope of the baseline field assessment were not sufficient to assess whether desert kit fox or American badger are present on the Project site. Therefore, CDFW recommends that prior to commencing Project activities, pre-construction surveys for desert kit fox and American badger be conducted by a qualified biologist. As a result, CDFW recommends the following mitigation measures be included in the MND:
MM BIO-5: Desert Kit Fox Surveys
No more than 14 days prior to the beginning of ground disturbance and/or Project activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct pre-construction surveys to determine if potential desert kit fox burrows/dens are present in the Project area. Pre-construction surveys should include 100-percent visual coverage of the Project area and cannot be combined with other surveys conducted for other species while using the same personnel. If the pre-construction surveys confirm occupied desert kit fox habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted, and the qualified biologist shall notify CDFW and USFWS to develop avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures. No disturbance of active dens shall take place when juvenile desert kit fox may be present and dependent on parental care.
MM BIO-6: American Badger Surveys
No more than 30 days prior to the beginning of ground disturbance and/or construction activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey to 10 11
4-409
Pilar Lopez, Associate Planner
City of Rancho Mirage
January 10, 2023
determine if potential American badger burrows are present in the Project area. If potential burrows are located, they shall be monitored using the best judgement of the qualified biologist. If the burrow is determined to be active, the qualified biologist shall flag and create a 50-foot buffer around the den. If impacts to the den are unavoidable, the qualified biologist will verify there are suitable burrows in avoided habitat within the Project area or outside of the Project area prior to undertaking passive relocation actions. If no suitable burrows are located, artificial burrows shall be created at least 14 days prior to passive relocation. The qualified biologist shall block the entrance of the active burrow with soil, sticks, and debris for 3-5 days to discourage the use of the burrow prior to Project activities. The entrance shall be blocked to an incrementally greater degree over the 3- to 5-day period. After the qualified biologist has determined there are no active burrows, the burrows shall be hand-excavated to prevent re-use. No disturbance of active dens shall take place when juvenile American badgers may be present and dependent on parental care. A qualified biologist shall determine appropriate buffers and maintain connectivity to adjacent habitat should natal burrows be present.
Minimizing Impacts to Other Species
The MND (p. 33) states that the Project site provides “suitable foraging and cover habitat for reptilian species,” “suitable foraging and nesting habitat for avian species,” and “suitable foraging and denning habitat for mammalian species,” and lists common species identified during the biological survey but includes no avoidance and minimization measures. Because of the potential for previously undetected wildlife to occur on the Project site, CDFW recommends inclusion of the following mitigation measure to allow non-listed, non-special-status terrestrial wildlife to leave or be moved out of harm’s way:
MM BIO-7: Minimizing Impacts to Other Species
To avoid impacts to terrestrial wildlife, a qualified biologist shall be on-site prior to and during all ground- and habitat-disturbing activities to inspect the Project area prior to any Project activities. Individuals of any wildlife species found shall not be harassed and shall be allowed to leave the Project area unharmed. If needed, a qualified biologist may guide, handle, or capture an individual non-listed, non-special-status wildlife species to move it to a nearby safe location within nearby refugium, or it shall be allowed to leave the Project site of its own volition. Capture methods may include hand, dip net, lizard lasso, snake tongs, and snake hook. If the wildlife species is discovered or is caught in any pits, ditches, or other types of excavations, the qualified biologist shall release it into the most suitable habitat nearby the site of capture. Movement of wildlife out of harm’s way should be limited to only those individuals that would otherwise by injured or killed, and individuals should be moved only as far a necessary to ensure their safety. Measures shall be taken to prevent wildlife from re-entering the Project site. Only biologists with appropriate authorization by CDFW shall move CESA-listed or other special-status species.
Noise
Construction may result in substantial noise through road use, equipment, and other Project-related activities. This may adversely affect wildlife species in several ways as wildlife responses to noise can occur at exposure levels of only 55 to 60 dB (Barber et al. 2009). Anthropogenic noise can disrupt the communication of many wildlife species including frogs, birds, and bats (Sun and Narins 2005, Patricelli and Blickley 2006, Gillam and McCracken 2007, Slabbekoorn and Ripmeester 2008). Noise can also affect predator- prey relationships as many nocturnal animals such as bats and owls primarily use auditory cures (i.e., hearing) to hunt. Additionally, many prey species increase their vigilance behavior when exposed to noise because they need to rely more on visual det ection of predators when auditory cues may be masked by noise (Rabin et al. 2006, Quinn et al. 2017). Noise has also been shown to reduce the density of nesting birds (Francis et al. 11 12
13 4-410
Pilar Lopez, Associate Planner
City of Rancho Mirage
January 10, 2023
2009) and cause increased stress that results in decreased immune respons es (Kight and Swaddle 2011).
The MND (p. 60) states “construction noise would occur due to the use of equipment that includes a combination of trucks, power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that when combined can reach high levels,” but includes no analysis of the impacts of construction noise on biological resources. The MND indicates noise levels have the potential to reach 67 to 71 dBA during the hours when construction is permitted (p. 60), which exceeds exposure levels that may adversely affect wildlife species. CDFW is concerned about impacts to wildlife from noise generated during Project activities.
Although the MND includes Mitigation Measure (MM) N-1 and N-2 for noise, the timing and scope are insufficient to protect wildlife. Because of the potential for construction noise to negatively impact wildlife, CDFW recommends the revised MND include an analysis of impacts to biological resources and specific avoidance and minimization measures to ensure that impacts to wildlife do not occur. CDFW recommends the following mitigation measure be included in the MND:
MM BIO-8: Noise
Restrict use of equipment to hours least likely to disrupt wildlife (e.g., not at night or in early morning). Do not use generators except for temporary use in emergencies. Power to sites can be provided by solar PV (photovoltaic) systems, cogeneration systems (natural gas generator), small micro- hydroelectric systems, or small wind turbine systems. Consider use of noise suppression devices such as mufflers or enclosure for generators. Sounds generated from any means must be below the 55-60 dB range within 50-feet from the source.
Artificial Light
Artificial nighttime lighting often results in light pollution, which has the potential to significantly and adversely affect fish and wildlife. Artificial lighting alters ecological processes including, but not limited to, the temporal niches of species; the repair and recovery of physiological function; the measurement of time through interference with the detection of circadian and lunar and seasonal cycles; and the detection of resources and natural enemies and navigation (Gatson et al. 2013). Many species use photoperiod cues for communication (e.g., bird song; Miller 2006), determining when to begin foraging (Stone et al. 2009), behavior thermoregulation (Beiswenger 1977), and migration (Longcore and Rich 2004). Phototaxis, a phenomenon which results in attraction and movement towards light, can disorient, entrap, and temporarily blind wildlife species that experience it (Longcore and Rich 2004).
The MND (p. 19) indicates that the development on the Project will “introduce new sources of lighting, including streetlights and security lighting”; however, impacts to biological resources are not analyzed and no mitigation measures are proposed. The direct and indirect impacts of artificial nighttime lighting on biological resources including migratory birds that fly at night, bats, and other nocturnal and crepuscular wildlife should be analyzed, and appropriate avoidance and minimization measures should be included in the revised MND. Because of the potential for artificial nighttime lighting used during construction and during operation of the housing development to impact biological resources, CDFW recommends that the MND be revised to include the following mitigation measure:
MM BIO-9: Artificial Light
During Project construction and operation, the City shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area and avoid or limit the use of artificial light during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City shall ensure that lighting for Project activities is shielded, cast downward, and does not spill over onto other properties or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark-Sky Association 13 14
4-411
Pilar Lopez, Associate Planner
City of Rancho Mirage
January 10, 2023
standards at http://darksky.org/) . Use LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, properly dispose of hazardous waste, and recycle lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler.
Lake and Streambed Alteration Program
Fish and Game Code section 1602 requires an entity to notify CDFW prior to commencing any activity that may do one or more of the following: substantially divert or obstruct the natural flow of any river, stream, or lake; substantially change or use any material from the bed, channel, or bank of any river, stream, or lake; or deposit debris, waste or other materials that could pass into any river, stream, or lake. Note that "any river, stream or lake" includes those that are episodic (i.e., those that are dry for periods of time) as well as those that are perennial (i.e., those that flow year-round). This includes ephemeral streams, desert washes, and watercourses with a subsurface flow. It may also apply to work undertaken within the flood plain of a body of water. Upon receipt of a complete notification, CDFW determines if the proposed Project activities may substantially adversely affect existing fish and wildlife resources and whether a Lake and Streambed Alteration (LSA) Agreement is required. An LSA Agreement includes measures necessary to protect existing fish and wildlife resources. CDFW may suggest ways to modify the Project that would eliminate or reduce harmful impacts to fish and wildlife resources.
CDFW’s issuance of an LSA Agreement is a “project” subject to CEQA (see Pub.
Resources Code § 21065). To facilitate issuance of an LSA Agreement, if necessary, the IS/MND should fully identify the potential impacts to the lake, stream, or riparian resources, and provide adequate avoidance, mitigation, and monitoring and reporting commitments.
Early consultation with CDFW is recommended since modification of the proposed Project may be required to avoid or reduce impacts to fish and wildlife resources. To submit a Lake or Streambed Alteration notification, visit:
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Environmental-Review/LSA .
Based on aerial imagery, ephemeral streams may occur on the Project site. To avoid or minimize adverse impacts to fish and wildlife resources identified above, CDFW recommends the following mitigation measure be added to the IS/MND:
MM BIO-10: Lake and Stream Alteration (LSA) Program
Prior to Project-activities and issuance of any grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall obtain written correspondence from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) stating that notification under section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code is not required for the Project, or the Project Sponsor shall obtain a CDFW-executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement, authorizing impacts to Fish and Game Code section 1602 resources associated with the Project.
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA
CEQA requires that information developed in environmental impact reports and negative declarations be incorporated into a database which may be used to make subsequent or supplemental environmental determinations. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21003, subd. (e).) Accordingly, please report any special-status species and natural communities detected during Project surveys to the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). The CNNDB field survey form can be filled out and submitted online at the following link:
https://wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Submitting-Data . The types of information reported to CNDDB can be found at the following link: https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants- and-Animals.
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENT FILING FEES
The Project, as proposed, would have an impact on fish and/or wildlife, and assessment of environmental document filing fees is necessary. Fees are payable upon filing of the Notice of Determination by the Lead Agency and serve to help defray the cost of 14 15
16 17
4-412
Pilar Lopez, Associate Planner
City of Rancho Mirage
January 10, 2023
environmental review by CDFW. Payment of the environmental document filing fee is required in order for the underlying project approval to be operative, vested, and final. (Cal.
Code Regs, tit. 14, § 753.5; Fish & G. Code, § 711.4; Pub. Resources Code, § 21089.)
CONCLUSION
CDFW appreciates the opportunity to comment on the MND to assist the City of Rancho Mirage in identifying and mitigating Project impacts on biological resources. CDFW concludes that the MND does not adequately identify or mitigate for the Project’s significant, or potentially significant, impacts on biological resources. CDFW recommends that prior to adoption of the MND, the City of Rancho Mirage revise the document to include a more complete assessment of the Project’s potential impacts on biological resources, as well as appropriate avoidance, minimization, and mitigation measures to ensure those impacts are mitigated to a level less than significant. CDFW personnel are available for consultation regarding biological resources and strategies to minimize impacts.
Questions regarding this letter or further coordination should be directed to Alyssa Hockaday, Senior Environmental Scientist (Specialist), at (760) 920-8252 or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Kim Freeburn
Environmental Program Manager
Attachment 1: MMRP for CDFW -Proposed Mitigation Measures ec:
Heather Brashear, Senior Environmental Scientist (Supervisor), CDFW [email protected]
Vincent James, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
[email protected]
Rollie White, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
[email protected]
REFERENCES
Barber, J. R., K. R. Crooks, and K. M. Fristrup. 2009. The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25:180-189.
Beiswenger, R. E. 1977. Diet patterns of aggregative behavior in tadpoles of Bufo americanus, in relation to light and temperature. Ecology 58:98–108.
Francis, C. D., C. P. Ortega, and A. Cruz. 2009. Noise pollution changes avian communities and species interactions. Current Biology 19:1415–1419.
Gatson, K. J., Bennie, J., Davies, T., Hopkins, J. 2013. The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal. Biological Reviews.
Gillam, E. H., and G. F. McCracken. 2007. Variability in the echolocation of Tadarida brasiliensis: effects of geography and local acoustic environment. Animal Behaviour 74:277–286.
Kight, C. R., and J. P. Swaddle. 2011. How and why environmental noise impacts animals: An integrative, mechanistic review. Ecology Letters 14:1052–1061.
Longcore, T., and C. Rich. 2004. Ecological light pollution - Review. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 2:191–198.
Miller, M. W. 2006. Apparent effects of light pollution on singing behavior of American robins. The Condor 108:130–139.
Patricelli, G., and J. J. L. Blickley. 2006. Avian communication in urban noise: causes and consequences of vocal adjustment. Auk 123:639–649.
Quinn, J. L., M. J. Whittingham, S. J. Butler, W. Cresswell, J. L. Quinn, M. J. Whittingham, S. J. Butler, W.
Cresswell, and W. Noise. 2017. Noise, predation risk compensation and vigilance in the chaffinch Fringilla coelebs. Journal of Avian Biology 37:601 –608. 18 17
4-413
Pilar Lopez, Associate Planner
City of Rancho Mirage
January 10, 2023
Rabin, L. A., R. G. Coss, and D. H. Owings. 2006. The effects of wind turbines on antipredator beha vior in California ground squirrels (Spermophilus beecheyi). Biological Conservation 131:410–420.
Slabbekoorn, H., and E. A. P. Ripmeester. 2008. Birdsong and anthropogenic noise: Implications and applications for conservation. Molecular Ecology 17:72–83.
Stone, E. L., G. Jones, and S. Harris. 2009. Street lighting disturbs commuting bats. Current Biology 19:1123–1127. Elsevier Ltd.
Sun, J. W. C., and P. M. Narins. 2005. Anthropogenic sounds differentially affect amphibian call rate.
Biological Conservation 121:419–427.
ATTACHMENT 1: MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (MMRP) Biological Resources (BIO)
Mitigation Measure (MM) Description Implementation
Schedule
Responsible
Party
MM-BIO-1: Avoidance of Nesting Birds
Nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a
qualified avian biologist no more than (3) days
prior to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing
activities. Pre-construction surveys shall focus
on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting,
including nest locations and nesting behavior.
The qualified avian biologist will make every
effort to avoid potential nest predation as a
result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active
nests are found during the pre-construction
nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall
establish an appropriate nest buffer to be
marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species
specific and shall be at least 300 feet for
passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller
or larger buffer may be determined by the
qualified biologist familiar with the nesting
phenology of the nesting species and based on
nest and buffer monitoring results. Established
buffers shall remain on-site until a qualified
biologist determines the young have fledged or
the nest is no longer active. Active nests and
adequacy of the established buffer distance
shall be monitored daily by the qualified
biologist until the qualified biologist has
determined the young have fledged or the
Project has been completed. The qualified
biologist has the authority to stop work if
nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance.
No more than
three (3) days
prior to
vegetation
clearing or
ground-
disturbing
activities.
City of Rancho
Mirage
MM-BIO-2: CVMSHCP Compliance
Prior to construction and issuance of any
grading permit, the City of Rancho Mirage shall
ensure compliance with the Coachella Valley
Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
(CVMSHCP) and its associated Implementing
Agreement and shall ensure the collection of
payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development
Mitigation Fee.
Prior to
construction and
issuance of any
grading permit.
City of Rancho
Mirage
MM-BIO-3: Special-Status Plants
A thorough floristic-based assessment of
special-status plants and natural communities,
following CDFW's Protocols for Surveying and
Evaluating Impacts to Special Status Native
Prior to
commencing
Project activities.
City of Rancho
Mirage
18 19
4-414
Pilar Lopez, Associate Planner
City of Rancho Mirage
January 10, 2023
Plant Populations and Natural Communities
(CDFW 2018 or most recent version) shall be
performed by a qualified biologist prior to
commencing Project activities. Should any
state-listed plant species be present in the
Project area, the Project proponent shall obtain
an Incidental Take Permit for those species not
covered under the CVMSHCP prior to the start
of Project activities.
MM-BIO-4: Burrowing Owl Surveys
No less than 30 days prior to the start of
Project-related activities, a burrowing owl
habitat assessment shall be conducted by a
qualified biologist according to the
specifications of the Staff Report on Burrowing
Owl Mitigation (Department of Fish and Game,
March 2012 or most recent version).
If the habitat assessment demonstrates suitable
burrowing owl habitat, then focused burrowing
owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified
biologist according to the Staff Report on
Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If burrowing owls are
detected during the focused surveys, the
qualified biologist and Project Applicant shall
prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be
submitted to CDFW for review and approval
prior to commencing Project activities. The
Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed
avoidance, minimization, and monitoring
actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include
the number and location of occupied burrow
sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be
impacted, details of site monitoring, and details
on proposed buffers and other avoidance
measures if avoidance is proposed. If impacts
to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow
cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan
shall also describe relocation actions that will
be implemented. Proposed implementation of
burrow exclusion and closure should only be
considered as a last resort, after all other
options have been evaluated as exclusion is
not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or
mitigation method and has the possibility to
result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows
cannot be avoided, information shall be
provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable
habitat available to owls along with proposed
relocation actions. The Permittee shall
implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following
CDFW review and approval.
Pre-construction burrowing owl surveys shall be
conducted no less than 14 days prior to the
start of Project-related activities and within 24
hours prior to ground disturbance, in
accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing
Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent
version). Pre-construction surveys should be
Habitat
assessment: No
less than 30
days prior to
start of Project-
related. Pre-
construction
surveys: No
less than 14
days prior to
start of Project-
related activities
and within 24
hours prior to
ground
disturbance.
City of Rancho
Mirage
19 4-415
Pilar Lopez, Associate Planner
City of Rancho Mirage
January 10, 2023
performed by a qualified biologist following the
recommendations and guidelines provided in
the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If
the pre-construction surveys confirm occupied
burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be
immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall
coordinate with CDFW and USFWS to conduct
an impact assessment to develop avoidance
and minimization measures to be approved by
CDFW prior to commencing Project activities.
MM-BIO-5: Desert Kit Fox Surveys
No more than 14 days prior to the beginning of
ground disturbance and/or Project activities, a
qualified biologist shall conduct pre-
construction surveys to determine if potential
desert kit fox burrows/dens are present in the
Project area. Pre-construction surveys should
include 100-percent visual coverage of the
Project area and cannot be combined with
other surveys conducted for other species while
using the same personnel. If the pre-
construction surveys confirm occupied desert
kit fox habitat, Project activities shall be
immediately halted, and the qualified biologist
shall notify CDFW and USFWS to develop
avoidance, minimization, and mitigation
measures. No disturbance of active dens shall
take place when juvenile desert kit fox may be
present and dependent on parental care.
Pre-
construction
surveys: No
more than 14
days prior to
start of Project-
related activities.
City of Rancho
Mirage
MM BIO-6: American Badger Surveys
No more than 30 days prior to the beginning of
ground disturbance and/or construction
activities, a qualified biologist shall conduct a
survey to determine if potential American
badger burrows are present in the Project area.
If potential burrows are located, they shall be
monitored using the best judgement of the
qualified biologist. If the burrow is determined to
be active, the qualified biologist shall flag and
create a 50-foot buffer around the den. If
impacts to the den are unavoidable, the
qualified biologist will verify there are suitable
burrows in avoided habitat within the Project
area or outside of the Project area prior to
undertaking passive relocation actions. If no
suitable burrows are located, artificial burrows
shall be created at least 14 days prior to
passive relocation. The qualified biologist shall
block the entrance of the active burrow with
soil, sticks, and debris for 3-5 days to
discourage the use of the burrow prior to
Project activities. The entrance shall be blocked
to an incrementally greater degree over the 3-
to 5-day period. After the qualified biologist has
determined there are no active burrows, the
burrows shall be hand-excavated to prevent re-
use. No disturbance of active dens shall take
place when juvenile American badgers may be
present and dependent on parental care. A
Pre-
construction
surveys: No
more than 30
days prior to
start of Project-
related activities.
City of Rancho
Mirage
19 4-416
Pilar Lopez, Associate Planner
City of Rancho Mirage
January 10, 2023
qualified biologist shall determine appropriate
buffers and maintain connectivity to adjacent
habitat should natal burrows be present.
MM-BIO-7: Minimizing Impacts to Other
Species
To avoid impacts to terrestrial wildlife, a
qualified biologist shall be on-site prior to and
during all ground- and habitat-disturbing
activities to inspect the Project area prior to any
Project activities. Individuals of any wildlife
species found shall not be harassed and shall
be allowed to leave the Project area unharmed.
If needed, a qualified biologist may guide,
handle, or capture an individual non-listed, non-
special-status wildlife species to move it to a
nearby safe location within nearby refugium, or
it shall be allowed to leave the Project site of its
own volition. Capture methods may include
hand, dip net, lizard lasso, snake tongs, and
snake hook. If the wildlife species is discovered
or is caught in any pits, ditches, or other types
of excavations, the qualified biologist shall
release it into the most suitable habitat nearby
the site of capture. Movement of wildlife out of
harm’s way should be limited to only those
individuals that would otherwise by injured or
killed, and individuals should be moved only as
far a necessary to ensure their safety.
Measures shall be taken to prevent wildlife from
re-entering the Project site. Only biologists with
appropriate authorization by CDFW shall move
CESA-listed or other special-status species.
Prior to and
during Project
activities.
City of Rancho
Mirage
MM-BIO-8: Noise
Restrict use of equipment to hours least likely
to disrupt wildlife (e.g., not at night or in early
morning). Do not use generators except for
temporary use in emergencies. Power to sites
can be provided by solar PV (photovoltaic)
systems, cogeneration systems (natural gas
generator), small micro-hydroelectric systems,
or small wind turbine systems. Consider use of
noise suppression devices such as mufflers or
enclosure for generators. Sounds generated
from any means must be below the 55-60 dB
range within 50-feet from the source.
During Project
activities.
City of Rancho
Mirage
MM-BIO-9: Artificial Light
During Project construction activities, the City
shall eliminate all nonessential lighting
throughout the Project area and avoid or limit
the use of artificial light during the hours of
dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are
most active. The City shall ensure that lighting
for Project activities is shielded, cast downward,
and does not spill over onto other properties or
upward into the night sky (see the International
Dark-Sky Association standards at
http://darksky.org/) . Use LED lighting with a
correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or
During Project
activities.
City of Rancho
Mirage
19 4-417
Pilar Lopez, Associate Planner
City of Rancho Mirage
January 10, 2023
less, properly dispose of hazardous waste, and
recycle lighting that contains toxic compounds
with a qualified recycler.
MM BIO-10: Lake and Stream Alteration
(LSA) Program
Prior to Project-activities and issuance of any
grading permit, the Project Sponsor shall obtain
written correspondence from the California
Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) stating
that notification under section 1602 of the Fish
and Game Code is not required for the Project,
or the Project Sponsor shall obtain a CDFW -
executed Lake and Streambed Alteration
Agreement, authorizing impacts to Fish and
Game Code section 1602 resources associated
with the Project.
Prior to Project-
activities and
issuance of any
grading permit.
City of Rancho
Mirage
19 4-418
03-008-2021-004
Dear Pilar Lopez,
The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) appreciates your efforts to include the Tribal Historic Preservation Office (THPO) in the Vista Del Sol project. We have reviewed the documents and have the following comments:
[VIA EMAIL TO:[email protected]]
City of Rancho Mirage
Pilar Lopez
68-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, California 92270
January 26, 2023
Re: IS/MND Vista Del Sol Project
Again, the Agua Caliente appreciates your interest in our cultural heritage. If you have questions or require additional information, please call me at (760)699-6956. You may also email me at [email protected].
Cordially,
Lacy Padilla
Operations Manager
Tribal Historic Preservation Office
AGUA CALIENTE BAND
OF CAHUILLA INDIANS
*The presence of an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of Interior's standards during any ground disturbing activities.
*The presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural Resource Monitor(s) during any ground disturbing activities (including archaeological testing and surveys). Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. 20 4-419
Appendix G
Response to Comments – CDFW Letter
4-420
Response to Comment Letters
Vista Del Sol
Lead Agency:
City of Rancho Mirage
69825 CA-111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Prepared by:
The Altum Group
Anna Choudhuri
Jordan Parrish
Heather Boland
44-60 Village Court, Suite 100
Palm Desert, CA 92260
February 2023
4-421
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
While the City of Rancho Mirage (City) is not required to respond to comments on an IS/MND, Sections 21091(d)(1) and 21092.5 of the Public Resources Code (PRC) and Section 150874 (b) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines require that prior to project approval a Lead Agency must consider all comments received before making a final determination on the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND). Also, the Lead Agency must notify in writing, any public agency that submitted comments on the IS/MND, of any public hearing on the proposed project for which the IS/MND has been prepared (PRC 21092.5 and CEQA Guidelines 15073(e). The City of Rancho Mirage is the Lead Agency for the proposed Vista Del Sol Project (Project).
All letters commenting on the Draft IS/MND for the proposed project have been reproduced and are included in this section. All agencies from whom an individual letter was received during the public review period are listed below, along with our responses to comments received by each agency. All revisions to the Draft IS/MND have been made in response to the comments received during public review in strike-out/underline.
The City prepared a Draft IS/MND for the Vista Del Sol Project and circulated the Draft IS/MND for a 20-day public review period pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 3, Section 15105, of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. The review period gave agencies, organizations, and members of the public the opportunity to review the Draft IS/MND and provide comments on the document and the environmental analysis presented therein. The 20-day review period commenced on December 21, 2022, and ended on January 10, 2023. The Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt for the proposed project was posted at 69-825 Highway 111, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 for the duration of the public review period. During the review period, the City received one formal letter from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) commenting on the Draft IS/MND. These comments have been attached to this document. And is presented in the table below.
Date
Received Agency Comment Response
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 1 Comment is noted. No further action is required in response to this comment.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 2
Comment is noted. The City of Rancho Mirage recognizes
that CDFW is a Trustee Agency. No further action is
required in response to this comment.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 3
Comment is noted. The City of Rancho Mirage recognizes
that CDFW is a Responsible Agency for the project. No
further action is required in response to this comment.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 4 Comment is noted. No further action is required in response to this comment.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 5
Comment noted. The City of Rancho Mirage has found
the Biological Assessment to be sufficient. In order to mitigate any potential impacts on biological resources, we have included recommended mitigation measures
that are applicable to the project site offered by CDFW.
No further action is required in response to this
comment.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 6
Comment is noted. The City of Rancho Mirage recognizes
that CDFW is a Responsible Agency for the project. The
IS/MND will be recirculated at the State Clearinghouse for 4-422
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
a period of 30 days to ensure responsible and trustee
agency input. No further action is required in response to this comment.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 7
Comment noted. MM BIO-1 has been revised in the
IS/MND and MMRP as follows:
If unavoidable Project construction activities must begin during the nesting bird season (February 1st through
August 31st), a pre-construction nesting bird survey shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to initiation of ground disturbance and vegetation removal activities.
The nesting pre-construction bird survey shall be
conducted by a biologist familiar with identification of avian species known to occur in Riverside County. The
nesting bird survey shall be conducted on foot inside the project boundary, including a 300-foot buffer for
passerines (song birds) and 500-foot buffer for raptors in areas of suitable habitat. Inaccessible areas will be
surveyed using binoculars to the extent practical. If nests are found, an avoidance buffer (dependent upon species, the proposed work activity, the existing disturbances
associated with land uses outside of the site) shall be determined and demarcated by the biologist with bright
orange construction fencing, flagging, construction lathe, or other means to mark the boundary. If a raptor nest is observed in a tree proposed for removal, the applicant
must consult with CDFW. All construction personnel be
notified of the existence of the buffer zone and to avoid entering the buffer zone during nesting season. No
ground disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer area until the avian biologist has confirmed the
breeding/nesting is completed and the young have
fledged. Encroachment into the buffer shall occur only at the discretion of the qualified biologist.
Nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified
avian biologist no more than (3) days prior to vegetation removal or ground-disturbing activities. Pre-construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior.
The qualified avian biologist shall make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the preconstruction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist 4-423
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer shall be determined by the
qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer
monitoring results. Established buffers shall remain on- site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be
monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the
qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist shall have the authority to stop work if nesting pairs
exhibit signs of disturbance.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 8
Mitigation Measure BIO-2, CVMSHCP Compliance, will
become a Condition of Approval for the project, not a
mitigation measure. The applicant will pay the CVMSHCP
Local Development Mitigation Fee.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 9
A floristic based assessment of special-status plants and natural communities was conducted on the project site.
Since the project site is surrounded by existing
development, is isolated from native areas that support special-status plant species not covered by the
CVMSHCP, and is subject to anthropogenic disturbance,
the project proponent is not expected to need a State
Incidental Take Permit for impacts to State-listed plant species not covered by the CVMSHCP, as they are not
expected to occur.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 10
During the initial field survey conducted on September
14, 2021, the project site was surveyed for its ability to provide suitable habitat for burrowing owl. No
burrowing owls or recent sign (i.e., pellets, feathers, castings, or whitewash) was observed during the field
investigation. Portions of the project site are
unvegetated and/or vegetated with a variety of low-
growing plant species that allow for line-of-sight
observation favored by burrowing owls. However, the
project site lacks suitable burrows (>4 inches in
diameter) capable of providing roosting and nesting
opportunities. Therefore, it was determined that the
project site has a low potential to provide suitable
habitat for burrowing owls and focused surveys are not
recommended.
4-424
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
Out of an abundance of caution, a pre-construction
burrowing owl clearance survey is recommended to be
conducted to ensure burrowing owl remain absent from
the project site. Therefore, this portion of the CDFW
recommended MM BIO-4 will be included as MM BIO-3
in the IS/MND and MMRP as follows:
BIO-3: Pre-construction burrowing owl surveys shall be
conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of
Project-related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012 or most recent
version). Pre-construction surveys shall be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the pre-construction surveys confirm
occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall
coordinate with CDFW and USFWS to conduct an impact
assessment to develop avoidance and minimization
measures to be approved by CDFW prior to commencing
Project activities.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 11
The comment includes CDFW’s statements concerning
the potential for Desert Kit Fox and American Badger to occur on the project. As previously noted, the project
site is surrounded by existing development, is isolated from native areas that have the potential to support
desert kit fox and American badger, and is subject to
anthropogenic disturbance associated with the
surrounding residential developments.
During the initial field survey conducted on September
14, 2021, the project site was surveyed for its ability to provide suitable habitat for desert kit fox and American badger. No burrows/suitable denning cavities or sign was observed during the field investigation. Due to
surrounding development, the project site is isolated
from occupied areas supporting desert kit fox and
American badger. Due to the lack of suitable burrows,
and isolated nature of the project site, both desert kit fox and American badger are presumed absent from the
project site. Therefore, no further surveys are
recommended.
4-425
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 12
The project site is surrounded by existing development
and is isolated from native areas that have the potential to support a robust population of wildlife species. Due to surrounding development, the project site is only
expected to support common wildlife species adapted to
urban environments. Common wildlife species expected
to occur on the project site are mobile species and will likely moved during construction activities. Therefore, CDFW recommended Mitigation Measure BIO-7 does not
need to be incorporated into the project.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 13
Construction equipment use will follow the City’s noise ordinance found in Chapter 8.45 – Noise of the City of
Rancho Mirage Municipal Code. CDFW recommended
Mitigation Measure BIO-8 does not need to be
incorporated into the project.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 14
The proposed project is not anticipated to significantly increase lighting and glare. Light sources will be designed with internal baffles to direct the lighting towards the ground and the developed areas and have a zero-side
angle cut off to the horizon. Lighting for the proposed project will utilize energy-efficient LED shielded fixtures with energy savings control options and occupancy
sensing units. All lighting will be consistent with the City’s Exterior Glare, Heat, and Light Ordinance found in Section 17.18.050 of the City of Rancho Mirage
Municipal Code.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 15
No jurisdictional drainage and/or wetland features were observed on the project site or within the site during the field investigation. Further, no blueline streams have
been recorded on the project site. Therefore, written
correspondence stating that notification under section
1602 of the Fish and Game Code will be not required for the Project.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 16
Comment noted. As determined in the Biological
Assessment, there is a low likelihood of special status species to occur on the site. However, to mitigate any
impacts to any special status species that may occur on the site, it has been noted on page 35 of the IS/MND
that if a special-status species is documented onsite, the CNDDB field survey form will be completed.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 17 Comment is noted. No further action is required in response to this comment.
4-426
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 18
Comment noted. The City of Rancho Mirage has found
the Biological Assessment and IS/MND to be sufficient. In order to mitigate any potential impacts on biological
resources, we have included recommended mitigation
measures that are applicable to the project site offered by CDFW. No further action is required in response to
this comment.
January
10th, 2023 CDFW 19
Comment noted. The City of Rancho Mirage will adopt
the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, as
revised, as a Condition of Approval.
January
26th, 2023
Agua
Caliente
Band of
Cahuilla
Indians
20 Comment noted. Mitigation Measure (MM) CUL-1 has
been revised as follows:
CUL-1: If buried cultural materials are discovered during the earth-moving operations, all work in that area should be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the finds and, if necessary, develop a treatment plan in consultation with the City of Rancho Mirage and the appropriate Native
American tribes. The presence of a qualified
archaeologist shall meet the Secretary of the Interior’s standards during any ground disturbing activities.
MM TCR-1 has been revised as follows:
TCR-1: If buried cultural materials are discovered during the earth-moving operations, all work in that area should be halted or diverted until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the finds and, if necessary, develop a treatment pan in consultation with the City of Rancho Mirage and the appropriate Native
American tribes. The presence of an archaeologist shall meet the Secretary of the Interior’s standards during any ground disturbing activities.
In addition to the modifications mentioned above, MM
TCR-2 has been added as follows:
TCR-2: During any ground disturbing activities (including any archaeological testing and surveys) the presence of an approved Agua Caliente Native American Cultural
Resource Monitor(s) is required. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor shall request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall
4-427
RESPONSE TO COMMENTS
notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the
Interior’s Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to
the State Historic Preservation Officer and the Agua
Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office.
4-428
“Responsible Planning Through Environmental Leadership” 2201 N. Grand Avenue #10098 | Santa Ana, CA 92711-0098 | (714) 716-5050 www.ELMTConsulting.com
SUBJECT: Response to Comments – CDFW Letter dated January 10, 2023 Vista Del Sol 8-Lot Subdivision
City of Rancho Mirage, Riverside County
Comment 1:
The comment includes introductory statements. No response is necessary.
Comment 2:
The comment includes introductory statements concerning CDFW’s role. No response is necessary.
Comment 3:
The comment includes introductory statements concerning CDFW’s role. No response is necessary.
Comment 4:
The comment includes introductory statements concerning the project description. No response is necessary.
Comment 5:
The comment includes CDFW’s statements concerning their comments and recommendations for the project. No response is necessary.
Comment 6:
The comment includes CDFW’s statements concerning circulation of CEQA documents to the State Clearinghouse for the project. No response is necessary.
Comment 7:
Mitigation Measure BIO-1, Avoidance of Nesting Birds, provided by CDFW will be updated to reflect the recommended changes.
Comment 8:
Mitigation Measure BIO-2, CVMSHCP Compliance, will become a Condition of Approval for the project, not a mitigation measure. The applicant will pay the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee.
Comment 9:
The comment includes CDFW’s statements concerning special-status plants. No response is necessary.
4-429
January 17, 2023
Comment 10:
A floristic based assessment of special-status plants and natural communities was conducted on the project site. Since the project site is surrounded by existing development, is isolated from native areas that support special-status plant species not covered by the CVMSHCP, and is subject to anthropogenic disturbance, the project proponent is not expected to need a State Incidental Take Permit for impacts to State-listed plant species not covered by the CVMSHCP, as they are not expected to occur.
Comment 11:
During the initial field survey conducted on September 14, 2021, the project site was surveyed for its ability to provide suitable habitat for burrowing owl. No burrowing owls or recent sign (i.e., pellets, feathers, castings, or whitewash) was observed during the field investigation. Portions of the project site are unvegetated and/or vegetated with a variety of low-growing plant species that allow for line-of-sight observation favored by burrowing owls. However, the project site lacks suitable burrows (>4 inches in diameter) capable of providing roosting and nesting opportunities. Therefore, it was determined that the project site has a low potential to provide suitable habitat for burrowing owls and focused surveys are not recommended.
Out of an abundance of caution, a pre-construction burrowing owl clearance survey is recommended to be conducted to ensure burrowing owl remain absent from the project site. The last paragraph in Mitigation Measure BIO-4 provided by CDFW will be included in the MMRP.
Comment 12:
The comment includes CDFW’s statements concerning the potential for Desert Kit Fox and American Badger to occur on the project. As previously noted, the project site is surrounded by existing development, is isolated from native areas that have the potential to support desert kit fox and American badger, and is subject to anthropogenic disturbance associated with the surrounding residential developments. Both desert kit fox and American badger are
During the initial field survey conducted on September 14, 2021, the project site was surveyed for its ability to provide suitable habitat for desert kit fox and American badger. No burrows/suitable denning cavities or sign was observed during the field investigation. Due to surrounding development, the project site is isolated from occupied areas supporting desert kit fox and American badger. Due to the lack of suitable burrows, and isolated nature of the project site, both desert kit fox and American badger are presumed absent from the project site. No further surveys are recommended.
Comment 13:
The comment includes a statement about minimizing impacts to other species. The project site is surrounded by existing development and is isolated from native areas that have the potential to support a robust population of wildlife species. Due to surrounding development, the project site is only expected to support common wildlife species adapted to urban environments. Common wildlife species expected to occur on the project site are mobile species and will likely moved during construction activities. CDFW recommended Mitigation Measure BIO-7 does not need to be incorporated into the project.
4-430
January 17, 2023
Comment 14:
The comment includes a statement about construction noise and the potential development of the project to affect wildlife species. Construction equipment use will follow the City’s noise ordinances. CDFW recommended Mitigation Measure BIO-8 does not need to be incorporated into the project.
Comment 15:
The comment includes a statement about artificial nighttime light and the potential of the project to adversely affect fish and wildlife. The proposed project is not anticipated to significantly increase lighting and glare. Light sources will be designed with internal baffles to direct the lighting towards the ground and the developed areas and have a zero-side angle cut off to the horizon. Lighting for the proposed project will utilize energy‐efficient LED shielded fixtures with energy savings control options and occupancy sensing units. All lighting will be consistent with the City’s Light Pollution Ordinance.
Comment 16:
No jurisdictional drainage and/or wetland features were observed on the project site or within the during the field investigation. Further, no blueline streams have been recorded on the project site. Written correspondence stating that notification under section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code will be not required for the Project.
Comment 17:
The comment includes a statement about filling out the CNDDB field survey form if special-status species are documented onsite. If a special-status species is documented onsite, the CNDDB field survey form will be completed.
Comment 18:
The comment includes a statement about CDFW’s filing fees. No response is necessary.
Comment 19:
The comment includes conclusionary statements. No response is necessary.
Comment 20:
Mitigation Measures provided in the MMRP table provided by CDFW are addressed in the responses above. 4-431
Appendix H
Geotechnical Report
4-432
4-433
4-434
4-435
4-436
4-437
4-438
4-439
4-440
4-441
4-442
4-443
4-444
4-445
4-446
4-447
4-448
4-449
4-450
4-451
4-452
4-453
4-454
4-455
4-456
4-457
4-458
4-459
4-460
4-461
4-462
4-463
4-464
4-465
4-466
4-467
4-468
4-469
4-470
4-471
4-472
4-473
4-474
4-475
4-476
4-477
4-478
4-479
4-480
4-481
4-482
4-483
4-484
4-485
4-486
4-487
4-488
4-489
4-490
4-491
4-492
4-493
4-494
4-495
4-496
4-497
4-498
4-499
4-500
4-501
4-502
4-503
DRAFT 4/27/2023 Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes Page 1 of 3
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
THURSDAY, APRIL 27, 2023 - 2:00 P.M.
DRAFT MINUTES
City Hall - Council Chamber
69-825 Highway 111
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
CALL TO ORDER - 2:00 P.M.
a)Flag Salute: Led by Chair Maxwell
b)Roll Call: Present: Agostini, Bryant, Chanter, Grey, Maxwell – All present COMMISSIONER COMMENTS –
Commissioner Bryant invited everybody to sign up to receive City’s newsletter in order to be kept apprised of the various events in the City.
Vice Chair Grey welcomed all the members of the City Council who were present.
Commissioner Chanter added that she also enjoys the newsletter.
Commissioner Agostini voiced his appreciation for the active communication the City provides the public.
Chair Maxwell noted that he has been on the Planning Commission for the last eight years and has thoroughly enjoyed it. He mentioned he will not seek reappointment and will be stepping down at the end of the term. He took the time to thank staff for all their support over the years.
Chair Maxwell welcomed and thanked the City Council for our great City of Rancho Mirage.
NON-AGENDA PUBLIC COMMENTS – None.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES – March 23, 2023, Regular Meeting
MOVED/SECONDED BY GREY/CHANTER TO APPROVE THE MARCH 23, 2023, REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES AS PRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED 5/0.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1.Environmental Assessment Case No. EA22-0003 and Tentative Tract Map Case No.
TTM22-0002 (TTM No. 38222) – Applicant: Bravo Holdings, LLC. Consideration to subdivide a 10.12-acre parcel into eight (8) residential lots and three (3) lettered lots, including a private street. The project site is located on the east side of Vista Del Sol, just east of the Betty Ford ATTACHMENT 7
4-504
4-505
4-506