Redding City Council
December 20, 2022

October 2022
Discussion:
a, b, d) Less than Significant Impact. The project would involve the use of heavy equipment for grading, hauling, and materials handling. Use of this equipment may require the use of fuels and other common materials that have hazardous properties (e.g., fuels are flammable). As a part of the Clean Water Act Section 402, National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System, a SWPPP is required when obtaining a general construction permit. Compliance under water quality regulations and the SWPPP would require use of the following standard BMPs to avoid or minimize the potential for accidental release of hazardous materials from spills or fuel leaks during project construction:
 HAZ-1. Hazardous materials, including fuels, oils, cement, and solvents, will be stored and contained in an area protected from direct runoff and away from areas where they could enter waters of the United States.
 HAZ-2. Construction equipment will be inspected daily for leaks. Leaking fluids will be contained upon detection, and equipment repairs will be made as soon as practicable, or the leaking equipment will be moved offsite.
 HAZ-3. Secondary containment such as drip pans or absorbent materials will be used to catch spills or leaks when removing or changing fluids. Secondary containment will be used for storage of all hazardous materials.
 HAZ-4. Spill containment and cleanup materials will be kept onsite at all times for use in the event of an accidental spill.
 HAZ-5. Absorbent materials will be used on small spills rather than hosing down or burying the spill. The absorbent material will be promptly removed and properly disposed of.

A search for hazardous wastes within 1 mile of the project areas was conducted using the California State Water Resource Control Board GeoTracker website and California Department of Toxic Substances Control EnviroStor website. A total of 77 known sites were identified within 1 mile of the project area. Remedial action has been taken on the majority of these sites, and they now have a “closed” status. The table below provides a list of the known hazardous waste sites with a status of “Open” within 1 mile of the project.

Site Name Global ID Site_Type Status
Tay Van Car Wash T0608900284 LUST Cleanup Site Open - Remediation San Francisco Deli T10000011100 LUST Cleanup Site Open - Assessment & Interim Remedial Action
Village Plaza Cleaner SL0608997819 LUST Cleanup Site Open - Site Assessment Redding Lumber Transport T10000010253 Cleanup Program Site Open - Assessment & Interim Remedial Action
SST Oil Inc. SL375312880 Cleanup Program Site Open - Verification Monitoring ConocoPhillips Bulk Plant #0629 - Redding SL375322881 Cleanup Program Site Open - Eligible for Closure Payless Gas & Food Mart T0608900234 LUST Cleanup Site Open - Verification Monitoring Ram Auto Sales T10000003476 LUST Cleanup Site Open - Site Assessment 76 SS# 2611241 T0608936410 LUST Cleanup Site Open - Remediation Churn Creek Chevron T0608900278 LUST Cleanup Site Open - Remediation Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Flood Damage Repair Project Page 25
October 2022
Note:

LUST = leaking underground storage tank
The open hazardous waste sites do not pose a threat as the proposed project is not located on these sites and the potential for project construction and operation to create a hazard to the public or the environment through the accidental spill or pollutants would be less than significant. c) No Impact. There are no existing or currently proposed schools within 0.25 mile of the project area.

No hazardous waste emissions or handling of hazardous materials would occur within 0.25 mile of an existing or currently proposed school. Therefore, no impact would occur. d) No Impact. The Blue Gravel Mine Trail project area is within approximately 0.4 mile of Benton Airpark. However, the Project would not result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the Project area because the project is not within the direct vicinity or flight path of Benton Airpark.

Therefore, there would be no impact related to safety of the public in the project area. e) No Impact. The project would not impair implementation of or interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, there would be no impact. f) Lessthan Significant Impact. The use of construction equipment in and around vegetated areas increases the potential for wildfire ignition. Operation of the project would not increase the existing wildfire potential; however, the standard specifications require internal combustion engines to be equipped with an operational spark arrester, or the engine must be equipped for the prevention of fire.

Therefore, the potential for wildfire ignition would be less than significant.

Documentation:
 City of Redding. 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Health and Safety Element.  State Water Resources Control Board. Geotracker. Accessed November 2021. https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/map/?CMD=runreport&myaddress=redding.  California Department of Toxic Substances Control. Envirostor. Accessed November 2021. https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/.
 Shasta County Airport Land Use Commission. 1981. Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map.

Mitigation:

None necessary.

HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the
project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
X
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede
sustainable groundwater management of the basin?
X
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of impervious surfaces, in a manner which would:

X
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study

October 2022
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY: Would the
project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or offsite; ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
X
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management system? X
Discussion:
a) Less than Significant Impact. Project construction may result in temporary impacts on surface water quality at the Turtle Bay East and Parkview Park sites. When soils are disturbed, surface runoff that flows across the site may contain sediments that are conveyed into the river. A construction general permit or NPDES and an ESCP would be implemented during construction. Additionally, the City’s construction standards require that all projects prepare an erosion and sediment control plan prior to construction to address water pollution control. The erosion and sediment control plan, BMPs HAZ-1 through HAZ-5, as well as the following BMPs would be implemented:
 WQ-1. All construction work and stockpiling of materials will be confined to the project disturbance area.
 WQ-2. Temporary stockpiling of excavated or imported material will be placed in upland areas.  WQ-3. Excess soil will be used onsite or disposed of at a regional landfill or other appropriate facility.

The proposed project would have a less than significant impact on water quality. b) No Impact. Project construction would not substantially deplete groundwater supplies because no groundwater would be used, and no groundwater wells would be affected during construction. c) Less than Significant Impact.
i) Less than Significant Impact. The project would implement an ESCP and comply with a construction general permit or NPDES that would result in minimal erosion or siltation from the construction of the project, and result in a less than significant impact. ii) No Impact. The project would not create any new substantial impervious surfaces and would not increase surface runoff with the restoration of trail areas. Construction laydown areas would be unpaved and permanently seeded after construction; therefore, there would be no impact. iii) No Impact. The project would not affect capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; therefore, the project would have no impact.

Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Flood Damage Repair Project Page 27
October 2022
iv) No Impact. Construction at the project sites is scheduled to occur during the dry season, and work within the drainage and swale areas would occur when there is no stream flow. The project would not impede or redirect flood flows; therefore, there would be no impact. d) No Impact. The project is not located in a flood hazard, tsunami, or seiches zone and there would be no impact.
e) No Impact. Construction and operation of the project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan.

Documentation:
 City of Redding. 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element.  City of Redding. 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Health and Safety Element.  Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. 2018. The Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) for the California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region. Fifth edition.

Revised May.
 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2021. National Flood Hazard Map. Accessed March 2021. https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home.

Mitigation:

None necessary.

LAND USE AND PLANNING
X. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Physically divide an established community? X
b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect X
Discussion:
a) No Impact. The project would have no potential to divide an established community. Therefore, there would be no impact.
b) No Impact. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan. The project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environment effect. Therefore, there would be no impact.

Documentation:
 City of Redding. 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Community Development Element.  City of Redding. 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element.

Mitigation:

None necessary.

Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study

October 2022

MINERAL RESOURCES
XI. MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the State?
X
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
General Plan, specific plan or other land use plan?
X
Discussion:
a) No Impact. The project is not within a known mineral resources area and would not result in the loss of mineral resource value to the region or to the residents of the state; therefore, there would be no impact.
b) No Impact. The project is not located within any “Critical Mineral Resource Overlay” area as identified in the General Plan; therefore, there would be no impact.

Documentation:
 California Department of Conservation Division of Mines and Geology. 1997. Open File Report 97-03.
 City of Redding. 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Natural Resources Element.

Mitigation:

None necessary.

NOISE
XII. NOISE: Would the project result in:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
X
b) Generation of excessive ground borne vibration or ground borne noise levels?
X
c) For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within 2 miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
X
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Flood Damage Repair Project Page 29
October 2022
Discussion:
a) Less than Significant Impact. Existing sources of noise and minor vibrations in the area include vehicles traveling on the local roadways and highway, sounds of children and families playing on the trails and in the Parks, and minor sounds of water flowing from the Sacramento River, Churn Creek, and Canyon Hollow Creek. Project operation would not result in audible noise, and ambient noise levels would remain the same.

During construction, standard construction equipment will be used and the project will generate noise intermittently. There will be no pile driving or other significant construction related operations that will generate significant noise impacts. Although there are some residences near the project sites, construction related impacts will be temporary and of short duration. Construction would be limited to daytime hours, generally between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on weekdays. Work could occasionally occur on a Saturday; however, no operations would take place on Sunday. Noise generated by temporary construction activities and permanent operation of the proposed project would be similar to existing conditions. The project would have a less than significant impact. b) No Impact. Potentially sensitive receptors such as nearby residences or recreational users would not be subject to excessive groundborne vibration or noise levels. The project would have no impact. c) No Impact. The Blue Gravel Mine Trail site is located approximately 0.5 mile away from Benton Airpark; however, the project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels; therefore, there would be no impact.

Documentation:
 City of Redding. 2000. Noise Standards 18.40.100.
https://library.municode.com/ca/redding/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TIT18ZO_DIVIVREAP ALDI_CH18.40DESIRE_18.40.100NOST.
 City of Redding. 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Noise Element.

Mitigation:

None necessary.

POPULATION AND HOUSING
XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (forexample, through
extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
X
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
X
Discussion:
a, b) No Impact. The purpose of the project is to improve trail areas damaged by flood events. The project would not induce population growth; expand capacity of new homes, businesses, and infrastructure; or call for the displacement of any number of housing, therefore resulting in no impact.

Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study

October 2022
Documentation:
 City of Redding. 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Housing Element.

Mitigation:

None necessary.

PUBLIC SERVICES
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES:
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or
physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental impacts, in order to maintain
acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
Fire Protection? X
Police Protection? X
Schools? X
Parks? X
Other public facilities? X
Discussion:
a) No Impact. The proposed project does not include new development or facilities and would not generate population growth that would result in an increased demand for public services such as fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, or other public services; therefore, there would be no impact.

Documentation:
 City of Redding. 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities.

Mitigation:

None necessary.

Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Flood Damage Repair Project Page 31
October 2022

RECREATION
XV. RECREATION:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
X
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X
Discussion:
a) No Impact. The proposed project is intended to repair damaged trail areas from previous storm flooding events. Trail repairs will occur at the four sites: Turtle Bay East, Parkview Park, Blue Gravel Mine Trail, and Enterprise Park, and include trail stabilization and erosion control measures to prevent damage from future storm events. The project would not encourage increased use and would not result in or accelerate substantial physical deterioration of the facility; therefore, there would be no impact.
b) No Impact. Although the project would provide repairs and preventative measures to the existing trails, no additional recreation facilities or expansion of recreational facilities are proposed; therefore, there would be no impact.

Documentation:
 City of Redding. 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Recreation.

Mitigation:

None necessary.

TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC
XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC: Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including transit,
roadway, bicycle, and pedestrian facilities?
X
b) Conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines
section 15064.3, subdivision (b)?
X
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
X
d) Result in inadequate emergency access? X
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study

October 2022
Discussion:
a) No Impact. The proposed project involves repair of existing trail areas and would not conflict with an applicable program, plan, ordinance, or policy for the performance of a circulation system. Therefore, no impact would occur.
b) No Impact. The proposed project would not degrade the existing level of service on current roadways within the vicinity of the project, or result in an increase in vehicle miles traveled. The project would have no impact.
c) No Impact. The project involves repair of existing trail areas and would not substantially increase hazards due to geometric design features or incompatible uses. There would be no impact. d) No Impact. The project would not conflict with emergency access routes because there are no planned road or lane closures to complete construction activities; therefore, no impact would occur.

Documentation:
 City of Redding. 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Transportation.

Mitigation:

None necessary.

TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
XVII. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the
project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code Section
5020.1(k), or
X
b) A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe.

X
Discussion:
a, b) No Impact. As described in the Cultural Resources section and the Cultural Resources Assessment (Appendix C), background research and surveys were conducted to determine if cultural resources were present in the project area. In addition, in July 2021, the City sent letters to individuals and groups who may have information regarding the proposed project area. Follow-up phone calls were made in July 2021 to ensure that the recipients had received the letters and to discuss any knowledge of cultural resources or proposed project concerns. None of the groups responded, and no tribal Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Flood Damage Repair Project Page 33
October 2022
cultural resources were identified in the project area. The proposed project would have no impact on tribal cultural resources.

Documentation:
 Jacobs. 2022. Cultural Resources Assessment.

Mitigation:

None necessary.

UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
XVIII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would
the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm
water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
X
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development
during normal, dry and multiple dry years?
X
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected
demand in addition to the provider’s existing
commitments?
X
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?
X
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statues and regulations related to solid waste? X
Discussion:
a) No Impact. The project does not require relocation of existing utilities or the construction of new utilities; therefore, there would be no impact.
b) No Impact. During construction, water would be used for dust control, but use would be minimal, and no additional water supplies would be needed during construction or operation; therefore, no impact would occur.
c) No Impact. The project would not generate wastewater or increase capacity at a wastewater treatment facility; therefore, there would be no impact.
d) Less than Significant Impact. During construction, the project would generate a small amount of waste including concrete removal and clearing/grubbing of work areas; however, the amount is not expected to exceed landfill capacities. Solid waste generated by the project would be transported to an approved disposal facility, and records would be maintained in the file. Therefore, impacts would be considered less than significant.

Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study

October 2022
e) Less than Significant Impact. The project may require disposal of construction debris, but only in small amounts. Construction debris would be disposed of consistent with federal, State, and local regulations. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant.

Documentation:
 City of Redding. 2000. City of Redding General Plan, Public Facilities.

Mitigation:

None necessary.

WILDFIRE
XVIV. WILDFIRE: If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
X
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
X
c) Require installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? X
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? X
Discussion:
a) Less Than Significant Impact. The Turtle Bay East, Parkview Park, and Enterprise Park project areas are not located within a state responsibility area or classified as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ). The Blue Gravel Mine Trail is within a local responsibility area and is in an area designated as VHFHSZ. In the event of wildfire, the Blue Gravel Mine Trail could be used as an emergency evacuation route for residents in the neighborhood west of the project. The project would not impair or alter any existing emergency response plan or evacuation plan. The impact would be less than significant.
b) Less Than Significant Impact. The project is located on an existing recreational path and the project would not exacerbate wildfire risks or expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations. The impact would be less than significant.
c) No Impact. The project would not require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure that could exacerbate wildfire risks. There would be no impact. d) No Impact. The project would not expose people or structures to downstream flooding or landslides.

No impacts would occur.

Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Flood Damage Repair Project Page 35
October 2022
Documentation:
 CalFire. 2020. Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Redding, Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones. https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/5992/redding.pdf.

Mitigation:

None necessary.

MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
XX. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less than
Significant
Impact No Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below the self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory?
X
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively
considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
X
c) Does the project have potential environmental effects which may causesubstantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
X
Discussion:
a) Less than Significant Impact with Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project would have minimal potential to degrade the quality of the environment, affect wildlife populations or their habitats, or reduce the number or restrict the range of rare or endangered plant and animal species.

Although special-status wildlife species, including migratory birds and bats, may be affected by implementation of the proposed project, standard mitigation measures (MMs) and BMPs, will be used to avoid adverse impacts on these species. Implementation of the proposed project would not eliminate examples of history or prehistory. The project’s impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.
b) Less than Significant Impact. As described in Section III, the proposed project could temporarily contribute to region wide cumulative air quality impacts. However, these impacts would be considered less than significant and under policy of the City’s General Plan, and application of standard BMPs would eliminate the potential for air quality impacts during project implementation.

The project’s potential cumulative impacts would be less than significant. c) No Impact. As discussed in this document, the proposed project does not include any activities that cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level or that could otherwise cause substantial adverse impacts on human beings, either directly or indirectly.

Documentation:
 See all previous sections.

Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study

October 2022
Mitigation:

MM-1. All areas to be avoided during construction will be fenced and/or flagged as close to construction limits as possible.

MM-2. Worker Environmental Awareness Training will be conducted by a qualified biologist before the start of work to educate crews regarding the location of the elderberry shrubs, life history and listing status of VELB, and the measures necessary to avoid impacts onto the shrub and VELB habitat (USFWS 2017).

MM-3. A qualified biologist will monitor the work area at project-appropriate intervals to assure that all avoidance and minimization measures are implemented.

MM-4. Activities that involve work within the stream channel and activities within 165 feet of the elderberry shrub will be conducted during the lowest flow period and outside of the flight season of VELB. The work period for the Parkview Park is July 1 to October 31.

MM-5. All construction personnel will be required to attend an environmental awareness training prior to the start of construction. The training will be conducted by a qualified biologist and will familiarize construction personnel with the special status species that may occur onsite, their habitats, provisions and protections, measures to be implemented, and the project boundaries. The training must be provided within 3 days of the arrival of any new worker.

MM-6. Prior to the onset of construction activities, a qualified biologist will conduct preconstruction surveys for western pond turtle, turtle nests, and foothill yellow-legged frog. If these species or turtle nests are observed during the preconstruction survey or during construction, CDFW will be contacted, and work within that area will be avoided until an appropriate course of action is established. If western pond turtle, turtle nests, or foothill yellow-legged frog are not observed during the preconstruction survey, then construction activities may begin. If construction is delayed or halted for more than 7 days, another preconstruction survey will be conducted.

MM-7. If vegetation removal or construction activities will occur during the nesting season for birds or raptors (February 1 through August 31 for birds and November 1 through July 1 for raptors), a qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey seven (7) days before construction activities begin. If nesting birds or raptors are found, CDFW will be notified and consulted. An appropriate buffer, as determined by CDFW and the qualified biologist, will be placed around the nest until the young have fledged. If construction activities cease for a period greater than 7 days, additional preconstruction surveys will be required.

MM-8. If an active raptor nest is found, no construction activities will occur within 300-feet of the nest for raptors and 450-feet of the nest for special-status raptors unless a smaller buffer zone is approved by the CDFW. Construction may resume once the young have left the nest or as approved by a qualified biologist.

MM-9. If it is determined that tree removal is required, the removal of trees 10 inches DBH or greater with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before bat maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 31), to the extent practical. If construction (including the removal of large trees) occurs during the bat non-volant season (March 1 through August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey of the study area to locate maternity colonies. The preconstruction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a maternity colony is located within or adjacent to the study area, a disturbance free buffer shall be established by a qualified biologist, in consultation with CDFW, to ensure the colony is protected from project activities. If construction activities cease for a period greater than 7 days, additional preconstruction surveys will be required.

Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Initial Study Flood Damage Repair Project Page 37
October 2022

APPENDIX A
Figure 1 – Vicinity Map
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project)

VICINITY MAP

CHURN CREEK

BLUE GRAVEL

TURTLE BAY

PARKVIEW
FIGURE 1
Vicinity Map
FEMA-4301-PW-0936
Turtle Bay East Storm Damage Project
Redding, Shasta County, California
\\DC1VS01\GISPROJ\R\REDDINGCACITYOF\W8Y06080_FEMA_ONCALL\GIS\MAPFILES\APPLICATION1600\TO1\COR_TO1_VICINITY_MAP.MXD CARCHER 4/14/2021 6:22:05 PM 0 2,000 4,000
Feet
LEGEND
Study Area (6.52 acres)
$
Service Layer Credits: Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China

PROJECT

LOCATION
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project)

ATTACHMENT C
Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) Flood Damage Repair Project Page 1
October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM

FLOOD DAMAGE REPAIR PROJECT
FEMA-PA-09-CA-4301-PW-00936
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2022100476)

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CONTENTS
This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (MMP/ECP) for the Flood Damage Repair Project (project). The MMP/ECP includes a brief discussion of the legal basis for, and the purpose of, the program, discussion, and direction regarding complaints about noncompliance; a key to understanding the monitoring matrix; and the monitoring matrix.

LEGAL BASIS OF AND PURPOSE FOR THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM California Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires public agencies to adopt mitigation monitoring or reporting programs whenever certifying an environmental impact report (EIR) or a mitigated negative declaration (MND). This requirement facilitates implementation of all mitigation measures adopted through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.

The MMP contained herein is intended to satisfy the requirements of CEQA as they relate to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. It is intended to be used by City of Redding (City) staff, participating agencies, project contractors, and mitigation monitoring personnel during implementation of the project.

Mitigation is defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15370 as a measure that does any of the following:
 Avoids impacts altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action.  Minimizes impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation.  Rectifies impacts by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment.  Reduces or eliminates impacts over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the project.
 Compensates for impacts by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments.

The intent of the MMP is to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of adopted mitigation measures and permit conditions. The MMP will provide for monitoring of construction activities as necessary, onsite identification and resolution of environmental problems, and proper reporting to City staff.

In addition to meeting the CEQA MMP requirements, this document incorporates environmental commitments, standard practices, conservation measures, and best management practices (BMPs).

The environmental commitments may be part of the project design, standard contract specifications, City requirements, or conservation measures. These commitments are part of the project, but they do not Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program

October 2022
constitute mitigation under CEQA as they have not been incorporated to reduce a potentially significant impact.

MITIGATION MONITORING/ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM TABLE The MMP/ECP Table identifies the mitigation measures and commitments proposed for the project.

The tables have the following columns:
 Mitigation Measure: Lists the mitigation measures identified within the Initial Study for a specific potentially significant impact, along with the number for each measure as enumerated in the Initial Study.
 Environmental Commitment: Lists the commitments identified within the project that are not related to a potentially significant CEQA impact, but further ensure environmental resource protection.
 Timing: Identifies at what point in time, review process, or phase the mitigation measure will be completed.
 Agency/Department Consultation: References the City department or any other public agency with which coordination is required to satisfy the identified mitigation measure.  Verification: Spaces to be initialed and dated by the individual designated to verify adherence to a specific mitigation measure.

NONCOMPLIANCE COMPLAINTS
Any person or agency may file a complaint asserting noncompliance with the mitigation measures and commitments associated with the project. The complaint shall be directed to the City in written form, providing specific information on the asserted violation. The City shall investigate and determine the validity of the complaint. If noncompliance with a mitigation measure has occurred, the City shall take appropriate action to remedy any violation. The compliant shall receive written confirmation indicating the results of the investigation or the final action corresponding to the particular noncompliance issue.

Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Flood Damage Repair Project Page 3
October 2022

MITIGATION MONITORING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM TABLE

FOR THE FLOOD DAMAGE REPAIR PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2022100476)

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
The following environmental commitments will be incorporated into the project to further protect environmental and biological resources:

Best Management Practices
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
Air Quality (AQ)
AQ-1. Nontoxic soil stabilizers will be applied according to manufacturer’s specification to all inactive construction areas.

Construction Construction
Management
AQ-2. All grading operations will be suspended when winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 miles per hour.

Construction Construction
Management
AQ-3. Water all stockpiles, access roads, and disturbed or exposed areas, as necessary, to prevent airborne dust.

Construction Construction
Management
AQ-4. Pursuant to the California Vehicle Code (Section 23114(e)(4)) (California Legislative Information 2016), all trucks hauling soil and other loose material to and from the construction site will be covered or will maintain at least 6 inches of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical distance between top of load and the trailer).

Construction Construction
Management
AQ-5. All public roadways used by the project contractor will be maintained free from dust, dirt, and debris caused by construction activities. Streets will be swept at the end of the day if visible soil materials are carried onto adjacent public paved roads.

Construction Construction
Management
Biological Resources (BIO)
BIO-1. As required by the City of Redding Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, an erosion and sediment control plan (ESCP) or will be prepared to address BMPs that will be used to prevent erosion and sediment loss. The ESCP must also address dust control, spill control, pollution control, waste management, equipment maintenance and fueling, and materials storage within the project site.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Flood Damage Repair Project Page 4
October 2022
Best Management Practices
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
BIO-2. Appropriate erosion and sediment control measures (e.g., silt fences, straw wattles) shall be in place prior to the onset of construction activities near jurisdictional waters and in project areas where there is a potential for surface runoff to drain into jurisdictional waters. The measures shall be monitored and maintained until construction activities have ceased.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
BIO-3. High visibility fencing, flagging, or markers will be installed along the edges of the work zone near avoided waters and riparian areas. In addition, equipment entry and exit points; and staging, storage, and stockpile areas must be clearly marked prior to the entry of mechanized equipment or vehicles into the construction area.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
BIO-4. The contractor will install the necessary containment structures to control the placement of wet concrete and to prevent it from entering into the channel outside of those structures.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
BIO-5. When the contractor is pouring or working with wet concrete there will be a designated monitor to inspect the containment structures and ensure that no concrete or other debris enters into the channel outside of those structures.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
BIO-6. No concrete shall be poured within the ordinary high-water mark (OHWM) if the 15-day weather forecast indicates any chance of rain greater than 30 percent.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
BIO-7. Concrete washout will occur in a designated and appropriately prepared area setback at least 100 feet from the riparian area.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
BIO-8. Poured concrete will be excluded from the wetted channel for a period of 30 days after it is poured. Commercial sealants may be applied to the poured concrete surface where difficulty in excluding water flow for a long period may occur. If sealant is used, water shall be excluded from the site until the sealant is dry.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
Cultural Resources (CR)
CR-1. If previously unidentified cultural materials are unearthed during construction, it is City policy that work be halted in that area until a qualified archaeologist can assess the significance of the find.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Flood Damage Repair Project Page 5
October 2022
Best Management Practices
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
CR-2. If human remains are discovered during project activities, all activities near the find will be stopped, and the Shasta County Sheriff-Coroner’s Office will be notified. If the coroner determines that the remains may be those of a Native American, the coroner will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Treatment of the remains will be conducted in accordance with further direction of the County Coroner or NAHC, as appropriate.

Construction City/NAHC/
County Coroner
Hazards and Hazardous Materials (HAZ)
HAZ-1. Hazardous materials, including fuels, oils, cement, and solvents will be stored and contained in an area protected from direct runoff and away from areas where they could enter waters of the United States.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ-2. Construction equipment will be inspected daily for leaks. Leaking fluids will be contained upon detection, and equipment repairs will be made as soon as practicable, or the leaking equipment will be moved offsite.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ-3. Secondary containment such as drip pans or absorbent materials will be used to catch spills or leaks when removing or changing fluids. Secondary containment will be used for storage of all hazardous materials.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ-4. Spill containment and clean-up materials will be kept onsite at all times for use in the event of an accidental spill.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ-5. Absorbent materials will be used on small spills rather than hosing down or burying the spill. The absorbent material will be promptly removed and disposed of properly.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
Hydrology and Water Quality (WQ)
WQ-1. All construction work and stockpiling of materials will be confined to the project disturbance area.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
WQ-2. Temporary stockpiling of excavated or imported material will be placed in upland areas. Construction City/ Construction
Management
WQ-3. Excess soil will be used onsite or disposed of at a regional landfill or other appropriate facility.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Flood Damage Repair Project Page 6
October 2022

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT MITIGATION MEASURES Resource-specific mitigation measures that will be used during project implementation include the following:

Mitigation Measure (MM)
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
Biological Resources (BIO)
MM-1. All areas to be avoided during construction will be fenced and/or flagged as close to construction limits as possible.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
MM-2. Worker Environmental Awareness Training will be conducted by a qualified biologist before the start of work to educate crews regarding the location of the elderberry shrubs, life history and listing status of VELB, and the measures necessary to avoid impacts on the shrub and VELB habitat (USFWS 2017).

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
MM-3. A qualified biologist will monitor the work area at project-appropriate intervals to assure that all avoidance and minimization measures are implemented.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
MM-4. Activities that involve work within the stream channel and activities within 165 feet of the elderberry shrub will be conducted during the lowest flow period and outside of the flight season of VELB. The work period for the Parkview Park is July 1 to October 31.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
MM-5. All construction personnel will be required to attend an environmental awareness training prior to the start of construction. The training will be conducted by a qualified biologist and will familiarize construction personnel with the special status species that may occur onsite, their habitats, provisions and protections, measures to be implemented, and the project boundaries. The training must be provided within 3 days of the arrival of any new worker.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
MM-6. Prior to the onset of construction activities, a qualified biologist will conduct preconstruction surveys for western pond turtle, turtle nests, and foothill yellow-legged frog. If these species or turtle nests are observed during the preconstruction survey or during construction, CDFW will be contacted, and work within that area will be avoided until an appropriate course of action is established. If western pond turtle, turtle nests, or foothill yellow-legged frog are not observed during the preconstruction survey, then construction activities may begin. If construction is delayed or halted for more than 7 days, another preconstruction survey will be conducted.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Flood Damage Repair Project Page 7
October 2022
Mitigation Measure (MM)
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
MM-7. If vegetation removal or construction activities will occur during the nesting season for birds or raptors (February 1 through August 31 for birds and November 1 through July 1 for raptors), a qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey seven (7) days before construction activities begin. If nesting birds or raptors are found, CDFW will be notified and consulted. An appropriate buffer, as determined by CDFW and the qualified biologist, will be placed around the nest until the young have fledged. If construction activities cease for a period greater than 7 days, additional preconstruction surveys will be required.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
MM-8. If an active raptor nest is found, no construction activities will occur within 300-feet of the nest for raptors and 450-feet of the nest for special-status raptors unless a smaller buffer zone is approved by the CDFW. Construction may resume once the young have left the nest or as approved by a qualified biologist.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
MM-9. If it is determined that tree removal is required, the removal of trees 10 inches DBH or greater with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before bat maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 31), to the extent practical. If construction (including the removal of large trees) occurs during the bat non-volant season (March 1 through August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a pre-construction survey of the study area to locate maternity colonies. The preconstruction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a maternity colony is located within or adjacent to the study area, a disturbance free buffer shall be established by a qualified biologist, in consultation with CDFW, to ensure the colony is protected from project activities. If construction activities cease for a period greater than 7 days, additional preconstruction surveys will be required.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project)

ATTACHMENT D
Comments and Response to Comments (if any)
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) Flood Damage Repair Project
Response to Public Comments Received on CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, State Clearinghouse #2022100476
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Flood Damage Repair Project was made available to the public and interested agencies for a minimum 30-day review period. The agency review period was managed by the State Clearinghouse (SCH) and closed on November 21, 2022. The public review period was managed by staff and closed on November 21, 2022. All written comments received during the public and agency review period are attached, along with written responses to environmental issues raised by commenters on the IS/MND.

Comments received on the public draft IS/MND do not identify new significant impacts or significant new information that would require recirculation of the draft IS/MND pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5. The purpose of this technical memorandum is to summarize comments and support adoption of the public draft IS/MND.

Response to Comments
One comment letter was received regarding the IS/MND. The comment letter is attached to this technical memorandum:

California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Letter A)

1. Letter A was submitted by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and includes five comments related to pre-construction surveys for turtles and birds, streamflow in Linden Ditch, 1602 permitting, and the California Endangered Species Act.

Comment 1 & 3. Pre-construction surveys – Mitigation Measures 6 & 7:

Response: The City has reviewed these Mitigation Measures and determined that they will satisfactorily protect the species. The qualified biologist will conduct the surveys in accordance with the most current CDFW protocol and/or the conditions provided in the 1600 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (LSA).

Comment 2. Streamflow in Linden Ditch and work area:

Response: In most years, Linden Ditch is perennial due to nuisance water. Backwater flooding from the Sacramento River only occurs during peak winter precipitation periods.

As described on page 14 of the Initial Study (IS) “Repair work at this location is limited to in-kind replacement of grouted riprap under and around the bridge abutments. The work area consists of dirt and remnants of the original scour protection riprap. Water will not be present in the work area during project activities; therefore, direct effects to salmonids Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) 2 and essential fish habitat (EFH) from in-water work or dewatering will not occur.” The low perennial flow is limited to the center of the channel, at its lowest point, and no water will be present in the work area (near the bridge abutments). In addition to the low-flow work window, standard conservation measures and Best Management Practices BIO-1 through BIO-8 were included to ensure potential impacts to anadromous fish are avoided (IS page 14 and 15).

Comment C4. Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement:

Response: Page 3 of the IS indicates that a permit or approval is required from CDFW.

Staff will coordinate with the CDFW and will submit a 1602 Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement Notification (LSAA).

Comment C4. California Endangered Species Act (CESA):

Response: No work will occur within the wetted channel and the project does not have the potential to “take” CESA protected species.

Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) Comment Letter A
Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) Comment #1
Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) Comment #2
Comment #3
Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) Comment #4
Comment #5
Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project) Packet Pg. 244
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(d)--Approval of the Flood Damage Repair Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to the Silverstone Subdivision-Unit 2 (AMND-2020- 01135/S-2019-00280):
(1) Accept the improvements in Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2 as satisfactorily complete; (2) Adopt Resolution accepting streets for maintenance and operation; and (3) Instruct the City Clerk to return the related securities to the developer following completion of the warranty period or as directed by the City Engineer upon completion of all obligations.

Fiscal Impact
There will be cumulative impacts to the Public Works Department due to the increase in public street infrastructure requiring annual maintenance, especially the asphalt pavement. The project will generate an incremental increase in state gas-tax funds based on population and point-oforigin sales; however, the increase in these revenues falls short of the anticipated annualized maintenance cost.

In addition, there will be an incremental increase in the City of Redding (City) utility costs due to the additional infrastructure. Generally, except for the storm-drain utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any increase in annual maintenance costs. The stormdrain utility is pressed with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to accept the improvements. Under this alternative, the City would be inconsistent with a long-standing policy of maintaining streets and infrastructure following the completion of the improvements in accordance with City standards.

MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Accept Improvements and Adopt Resolution Accepting Streets in the Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2 (AMND-2020-01135/S-2019-00280) Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 245
Report to Redding City Council December 13, 2022
Re: 4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2 Page 2 Background/Analysis
The developer, Sierra Pacific Industries, has satisfactorily completed the installation of all improvements in Unit 2 of the Silverstone Subdivision, (AMND-2020-01135/S-2019-00280).

The subdivision is located south of Rancho Road off Shasta View Drive. A map showing the location of the subdivision is attached.

The Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2 (AMND-2020-01135/S-2019-00280 and formerly “Stonecreek”) was approved by the Planning Commission on September 22, 2020, and all conditions of the map have been fulfilled. The final map for the subdivision was approved by the Council on October 18, 2022. All improvements have been satisfactorily completed, and all required fees have been paid. This subdivision was also required to form a landscape maintenance district, which has been formed.

The developer has completed all the conditioned improvements for the Silverstone Subdivision – Unit 2, (AMND-2020-01135/S-2019-00280). It is prudent to accept the improvements and adopt a resolution accepting streets for maintenance and operation. The developer has requested the City retain the existing performance security through the warranty period.

The resolution has been approved to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. On November 19, 2019, the Council adopted the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Stonecreek Subdivision (now Silverstone), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution - Streets and Maintenance
^Silverstone U 2 Site Loc Map
Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone
Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19
Packet Pg. 246
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

ACCEPTING FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE
STREETS IN SILVERSTONE SUBDIVISION, UNIT 2, (S-7-03/PD-5-04) WHEREAS, improvements have been satisfactorily completed in Silverstone Subdivision, Unit 2, (AMND-2020-01135/S-2019-00280); and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the streets in Silverstone Subdivision, Unit 2, (AMND-2020-01135/S-2019- 00280), be accepted into the City street system for maintenance and operation by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the City Council, pursuant to the authority provided in Section 1806 of the California Streets and Highways Code, that the streets in Silverstone Subdivision, Unit 2 (AMND-2020-01135/S-2019-00280), as shown on the map attached hereto and incorporated by reference, are accepted into the City street system for maintenance and operation by the City.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 20th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: ^Resolution - Streets and Maintenance (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: ^Silverstone U 2 Site Loc Map (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Silverstone Subdivision, Unit 2, (AMND-2020- 01135, S-2019-00280) and Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5 (S-7-03/PD-5-04):
(1) Approve the final maps and authorize the Mayor to execute a Subdivision Agreement with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company; and direct the City Clerk to file the maps with the Shasta County Recorder;
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 63rd Amendment to the City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $160,730 from Park In-Lieu/Southeast Quadrant to purchase 3.56 acres of land; and
(3) Authorize payment of $160,730 to the Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company (Developer) for 3.56 acres of land, described as Parcel A of the Silverstone Unit 2 final map, upon recordation of the final subdivision map.

Fiscal Impact
Approval of the final map for Silverstone, Unit 2, and Shastina Ranch, Unit 5, will have a cumulative impact to the Public Works Department due to the increase in public-street infrastructure requiring annual maintenance, especially the asphalt pavement. The project will generate an incremental increase in state gas-tax funds based on population and point-of-origin sales; however, the increase in these revenues falls short of the anticipated annualized maintenance cost.

In addition, there will be an incremental increase in the City of Redding (City) utilities costs due to the additional infrastructure. Generally, except for the Storm Drain Utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any increase in annual maintenance costs. The Storm Drain Utility is challenged with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover.

MEETING DATE: October 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(g)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(g)--Approve Final Maps and Execute Subdivision Agreements for Silverstone Subdivision, Unit 2 (AMND-2020-01135, S-2019-00280) and Shastina Ranch, Unit 5 (S-7-03/PD-5-04); and Adopt Budget Resolution Appropriating Funds Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Report to Redding City Council October 11, 2022
Re: 4.11(g)--Final Map-Silverstone Unit 2; Shastina Ranch Unit 5 & Budget Resolution Page 2

The recommended budget resolution allocates $160,730 of Park In-Lieu funds (Southeast Quadrant), leaving a remaining fund balance of $472,576 (Southeast Quadrant) and $1,846,201 respectively in the overall Park In-Lieu fund. There will be no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to approve staff recommendations which will require a finding that the subdivision is not being developed in accordance with the conditions of the approved tentative map or in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. In addition, it would not allow the transfer and purchase of 3.56 acres of property to the existing subdivision parkland. The Council could then provide staff alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
Silverstone Subdivision, Unit 2
The Silverstone Subdivision, Unit 2 (AMND-2020-01135, S-2019-00280), was approved by the Planning Commission on September 22, 2020. Attached is a map showing the subdivision, which is located south of Rancho Road and Shasta View Drive.

The developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, has submitted the final map and all other required data, which has been checked and approved by various City departments.

Relevant subdivision map conditions of approval have been met with the exception of some portions of the roadway conditions (arterial wall, pouring curb/gutter/sidewalk, centerline monument survey, street name signs, utility manhole, street lights and valve grade adjustments).

The developer has agreed to the execution of a subdivision agreement, has committed to completing these conditions, and has submitted a related security in the amount of $391,758 for the remaining work. The developer has been informed that no occupancy permits will be granted for residences constructed on lots until all related subdivision agreement conditions have been met.

Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5
The Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 2 (S-7-03/PD-5-04), was approved by the Planning Commission on July 16, 2005. Attached is a map showing the subdivision, which is located south of Rancho Road and Shasta View Drive.

The developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, has submitted the final map and all other required data, which has been checked and approved by various City departments.

Relevant subdivision map conditions of approval have been met with the exception of some portions of the roadway conditions (arterial wall, pouring curb/gutter/sidewalk, centerline monument survey, street name signs, utility manhole, street lights and valve grade adjustments).

The developer has agreed to the execution of a subdivision agreement, has committed to completing these conditions, and has submitted a related security in the amount of $430,191 for the remaining work. The developer has been informed that no occupancy permits will be granted for residences constructed on lots until all related subdivision agreement conditions have been met.

Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Report to Redding City Council October 11, 2022
Re: 4.11(g)--Final Map-Silverstone Unit 2; Shastina Ranch Unit 5 & Budget Resolution Page 3

Park Resolution
The Shastina Ranch Master Plan includes land dedications and land reservations to form a park facility at the location identified as Parcel A on the Silverstone Unit 2 final map. The park land includes 7.88 acres of land, of which 4.32 is land dedication. This was dedicated per the California Quimby Act, Subdivision Map Act (SMA) Section 66477, that allows a City to require dedication of land at 510 square feet per lot. Acreage in excess of that amount must be reserved through the entitlement process and purchased following the map recordation. As such,

3.56 acres of land will be purchased from the developer at $160,730 following the final map recordation. The valuation of the property is also outlined in the Quimby Act. The City Attorney has reviewed this arrangement.

Environmental Review
On June 15, 2005, the Council held a public hearing and adopted a resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S-7-03) and Planned Development Application (PD-5- 04) for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project after adopting a resolution certifying the completeness and adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report, EIR-1-03, on April 15, 2005.

On March 11, 2008, after a public hearing was held, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S-9- 05) Stonesfair Subdivision.

Condition 61 of the Stonesfair Subdivision Map and Condition 45a of the Silverstone (formerly Stonescreek) Subdivision Map (S-2019-0280) require the developer to make an irrevocable offer of dedication (minimum 7.55 acres) to the City in fee simple absolute. The Stonescreek Subdivision Application was approved and a mitigated negative declaration was adopted after a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2019. No further action is required at this time.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
x This agenda item is a routine operational item.
c: Ryan Masterson, Fire Marshal
Ken Iwamura, Public Works Department
Kyle Jones, Public Works Department
Kim Niemer, Community Services Department
Joseph Forseth-Deshais, Parks Division
Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map Silverstone Unit 2
^Location Map Shastina Ranch Unit 5
^Final Map Silverstone Unit 2
^Final Map Shastina Ranch Unit 5
Subdivision Agreement Silverstone Unit 2
Silverstone Unit 2 Letter of Credit
Subdivision Agreement Shastina Ranch Unit 5
Shastina Ranch Unit 5 Letter of Credit
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 63rd AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021-078 APPROPRIATING $160,730 FOR THE PURCHASE OF 3.56 ACRES OF PARK

LAND RELATED TO SILVERSTONE FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP
REQUIREMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
128 618 Parks In-Lieu $160,730
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Revenue
128-618-1-0001-01 Parks In-Lieu Division Balance $ 160,730 Increase Expenditures
128-618-4747-03 Shastina Ranch Park Land 160,730 $
Total $ 160,730 160,730 $
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $160,730 for the purchase 3.56 acres park land related to Silverstone Final subdivision map requirements for fiscal year 2022-23.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 18th day of October, 2022, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Silverstone U2 Security Calcs Page 1
Estimated Amount of Final Map Security
FOR
Silverstone, Unit 2

ENGINEERING DIVISION
P.O. Box 496071
REDDING, CA 96049-6071
(530) 225-4170
Date: 9/19/2022
Original Construction Estimate: Did not receive
Performance Security: Remaining work (provided by engineer) $ 231,125 (work remaining to be completed) 10% CONTINGENCY $ 23,113

3.0% INFLATION $ 6,934
Performance Security $ 261,171
Payment Security: Payment Security $ 130,586
(50% of Perf. Security)
TOTAL SECURITY 391,757 $
Calc'd By: Kyle A. Jones
Construction Manager
(530) 225-4181
[email protected]
EXHIBIT "A"
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Shastina Ranch U5 Security Calcs Page 1
Estimated Amount of Final Map Security
FOR
Shastina Ranch, Unit 5

ENGINEERING DIVISION
P.O. Box 496071
REDDING, CA 96049-6071
(530) 225-4170
Date: 9/19/2022
Original Construction Estimate: 2,324,400 $
Performance Security: Remaining work (provided by engineer) $ 253,800 (work remaining to be completed) 10% CONTINGENCY $ 25,380

3.0% INFLATION $ 7,614
Performance Security $ 286,794
Payment Security: Payment Security $ 143,397
(50% of Perf. Security)
TOTAL SECURITY 430,191 $
Calc'd By: Kyle A. Jones
Construction Manager
(530) 225-4181
[email protected]
EXHIBIT "A"
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Previous Report 10-18-22- Final Map Silverstone (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Conduct a Public Hearing, and, upon conclusion:
(1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration, upon a determination that the necessary findings for approval are in evidence;
(2) Offer Ordinance approving Rezoning Application RZ-2019-00314, consisting of rezoning 61.6 acres located at 2923 and 2873 Rancho Road to “RS-3-PD” Residential Single Family with a Planned Development Overlay District, for first reading by title only and waive the full reading; and authorize the City Attorney to prepare and the City Clerk to publish a summary ordinance;
(3) Approve Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-2019-00280, Stonecreek Subdivision; and
(4) Approve Planned Development Plan Application PD-2019-00309.

Fiscal Impact
The development of 218 homes along Rancho Road for the Stonecreek development is part of the larger Shastina Ranch Development. The overall development will add approximately 750 homes to the south east side of the City of Redding. The development proposes a variety of home types that will accommodate first time homebuyers up to higher end homes on large lots. The construction of the development, including the extension of Shasta View drive, will add additional jobs in the area, and provide much needed additional housing units for the community.

MEETING DATE: November 19, 2019
ITEM NO. 6.2
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.2--Public Hearing to consider the Stonecreek Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S-2019-00280), Planned Development Plan Application (PD-2019-00309), and Rezoning Application (RZ-2019-003140), by Sierra Pacific Land and Timber, requesting approval of a tentative subdivision map and planned development plan to divide 61.6 acres into 218 lots for single-family residences on property located at 2923 and 2873 Rancho Road. The project includes adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and an Ordinance approving the rezoning to add the "PD" Planned Development Overlay District to the existing "RS-3" Residential Single Family District.

Larry Vaupel, Development
Services Director
Packet Pg. 383 Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Report to Redding City Council November 13, 2019
Re: 6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could approve the project with modifications to the zoning, planned development plan, and/or conditions of approval deemed necessary to support the project based on the findings attached to this report, or deny the project. Denial of the project must be based upon a finding that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan or other City development standards or poses a threat to public health, safety, or welfare.

Background/Analysis
The City of Redding Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the project at its October 22, 2019, meeting. The staff report from that meeting is attached to this report. Staff has not received any public comment regarding the project and no testimony in opposition to the project was presented to the Planning Commission. The project requires the Council’s approval due to the rezoning request to add the “PD” Planned Development Overlay District to the existing “RS-3” Residential Single Family District zoning of the property.

This project represents development anticipated by the General Plan and the more specific development pattern considered by the City Council upon review and approval of the Shastina Ranch Planned Development in 2005.

Planned Development
The planned development (PD) process can be used to customize use and development standards to fit a project, as long as specific findings can be made, which largely center on consistency with the General Plan. PD projects are also expected to provide appropriate amenities and design enhancements, thus providing something extra or unique to support justification for deviation from standards.

To be eligible for the PD process, a site must be zoned to include "PD" as an overlay district.

Preparation of a PD Plan, such as what is attached, is required to illustrate the standards that are specific to the project. In this case, the proposed subdivision must incorporate the "PD" Overlay District with the "RS" District allow density averaging and a reduction of standard lot sizes to allow 108 of the homes to be constructed as attached single family homes in a courtyard style development on approximately 4,000-square-foot lots.

The PD would allow density averaging and a reduction of standard lot sizes based on the following amenities:
(1) A mix of four different types of lot sizes ranging from large 70-foot-wide lots, medium and small lots, and attached single family lots as small as 40-feet-wide. (2) Varying home designs that have a mix of two-story attached single family homes and single story detached homes.
(3) Shasta View Drive is proposed to have large parkways on both sides of the road with 10-foot wide mixed-use paths that accommodate all users. The paths will connect into the neighborhoods, the school site, the Clover Creek Open Space area, the detention basin/recreation area and the Shastina Park Site south of the project site.

Packet Pg. 384 Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Report to Redding City Council November 13, 2019
Re: 6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning Page 3 (4) Shasta View is designed with a traffic circle for traffic calming at the Street “H” intersection.
(5) The project includes 14 acres of open space that will preserve wetlands, a few large oak trees, and some of the original character of the site.
(6) The project site includes 6.1 acres to be dedicated as a school site.

The Planning Commission reviewed the project and recommended approval. The Planned Development was determined to be consistent with the General Plan and all findings have been made and are included within an attachment to this report. The “PD” Planned Development Overlay District rezone is essential to the development of the subdivision in order to achieve density goals and provide a development that serves a broader portion of the community.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Project Findings
Draft Conditions of Approval
Planning Commision Staff Report (available online)
Location Map
Ordinance
Zoning Map
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) Planned Development Plan (available online)
Tentative Map Set (available online)
Packet Pg. 385 Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2)

PROJECT FINDINGS

STONECREEK SUBDIVISION AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
(S-2019-00280 & PD-2019-00309)

ENVIRONMENTAL FINDING

1. Based on the Initial Study and the information contained in the record, there will be no significant effect on the environment. A Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate for the project.

2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and its supporting documentation reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding.

TENTATIVE FINDINGS
(Government Code Section 66474)
a. That the proposed map is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans as specified in Section 65451. The project density falls within the range anticipated by the property’s General Plan designation of "Residential, 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre." The project density is currently at 3.5 units per acre. The project design furthers General Plan Goals CDD2, CDD3, CDD5, CDD9, CDD10, CDD11, CDD12, CDD16, CDD16; NR3, NR5 through NR10; T3, T5, T6, T8, T9; HS2; R4, R5, R10, R11; PF1, PF2, PF15. b. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specific plans. All utility and service infrastructures will be made available to the site with development of this project. The design of the Planned Development subdivision is consistent with the goals of the General Plan and purpose of the Planned Development as described in the zoning code. c. That the site is not physically suitable for the type of development. The proposed development is proposed on relatively flat property therefore will accommodate creation of the proposed lots and residential structures without the need for any unusual grading or construction practices. The development to the south (Stonesfair) has been developed in a similar manner.
d. That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development. Although the site is encumbered by sensitive habitat, all of these areas containing these elements will be placed within open space. The project density is at the top of the General Plan range but is within allowable density.
e. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements is likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project did not identify any significant, unmitigated environmental impacts.

Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Project Findings (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Stonecreek Subdivision and Planned Development Findings Page 2 f. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements is likely to cause serious public health problems. The project does not present any adverse impacts to public health subject to compliance with all recommended conditions of approval. g. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through, or use of, property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the governing body may approve a map if it finds that alternate easements for access or for use will be provided and that these will be substantially equivalent to ones previously acquired by the public. This subsection shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction, and no authority is hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project design has incorporated access and open space easements. The new alignment of Shasta View Drive currently under construction will provide adequate access to the site and future connections will provide secondary access south through to Airport Road.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS

1. The proposed development is consistent with the goals, objectives, policies, standards, and programs of the Redding Zoning Ordinance and of the General Plan and any applicable specific plan, including density and intensity limitations that apply. The project is above the zoning density of 3 dwelling units per acre but is with the upper end of the General Plan designation of “Residential, 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre.” The project density is 3.5 dwelling units per acre and the project incorporates density averaging to allow a variety of housing types to meet a variety of incomes. This is the described goal of the General Plan to allow a variety of housing types.

2. The site for the proposed development is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use and all yards, open spaces, setbacks, walls and fences, parking area, loading areas, landscape, and other features required. The site is encumbered by large open space areas that have been identified as potential wetland areas, instead of disturbing these areas the applicant has proposed a Planned Development to allow density averaging to accommodate the density allowed but still preserve the open space areas. The Planned Development also allows the developer to take density credit for the school site dedication. The layout of roads and lots allows for the variety of lot sizes throughout the development.

3. The site for the proposed development has adequate access considering the limitations of existing and planned streets and highways. The design of Shasta View Drive in the General Plan will accommodate the full development potential of the Stonecreek Subdivision and the other three subdivisions located along this arterial roadway. The internal streets take access off of this arterial and most have multiple access points on Shasta View Drive allowing for adequate access.

4. Adequate public services exist or will be provided in accordance with the conditions of development plan approval, to serve the proposed development; and the approval of the Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Project Findings (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Stonecreek Subdivision and Planned Development Findings Page 3 proposed development will not result in a reduction of such public services to properties so as to be a detriment to public health, safety, or welfare. Most of the public utilities that will serve the site have been planned for more than a decade and have recently been installed with development of the Stonesfair project to the south of the subject property.

The utilities will be adequate to serve the proposed development and will not result in a reduction of such public services.

5. The proposed development, as conditioned, will not have a substantial adverse effect on surrounding property or the permitted use thereof and will be compatible with the existing and planned land use character of the surrounding area. The proposed Stonecreek development is similar in nature to the approved subdivisions to the south Stonesfair and the Shastina Ranch Subdivision. The Stonecreek project is consistent in the housing product types proposed and will not have an adverse effect on the surrounding developments.

6. The improvements required and the manner of development adequately address all natural and manmade hazards associated with the proposed development and the project site, including, but not limited to, flood, fire, and slope hazards. The project design considered hazards associated with the site and the mitigations address secondary access on Shasta View Drive and other potential traffic hazards. The site does not contain any floodplain, but has proposed to develop the storm drain system to help convey storm waters to a new detention basin located within the subdivision to the south.

7. The proposed development carries out the intent of the Planned Development provisions by providing a more efficient use of the land and an excellence of architecture and site design greater than that which could be achieved through the application of the base district regulations. Due to the numerous constraints on the property the project would have a difficult time meeting base densities without the allowance of density averaging on the site and a reduction in minimum lot sizes through the Planned Development process. The mix of housing types on the various lot sizes will allow for a mix of incomes to find housing within the development. One of the goals of the General Plan is to provide a mix of housing types and maintain housing densities with the General Plan range of density. The Planned Development allows the developer to meet the goals of the general plan and provides a superior product to the community.

Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Project Findings (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP S-2019-00280

STONECREEK SUBDIVISION

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
General Requirements
* Conditions marked with an asterisk are also environmental mitigation measures. ** Conditions marked with a double asterisk are to be indicated on the final map as notes.

1. Approval is granted to develop the 218-lot Stonecreek Subdivision, including Phase 6(15 lots) which will require an additional entitlement. The final map shall be prepared and development commenced in accordance with the tentative map as approved by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2019. The requirements of these conditions shall prevail in the event that there is any inconsistency between a condition and information or data presented on the tentative map.

2. The standard conditions for subdivisions delineated in Resolution 92-18 shall be met as marked on the attached form.

3. The developer shall note that Section 711.4 of the State Fish and Game Code requires payment of a fee to the County Clerk for filing a Notice of Determination for an environmental document; payment of this fee is the responsibility of the project proponent.

4. In accordance with Chapter 18.40.040 of the Zoning Code (Compliance With Map Requirements), all conditions applicable to post subdivision construction (as marked with a double asterisk **) shall be noted on the final map under a "Statement of Conditions" to provide notification to future property owners of building limitations and other requirements for the subdivision.

5. Acquisition of all off-site interests in title or easements necessary to satisfy the requirements of the subdivision approval shall be the responsibility of the developer. In the event the developer is unable to acquire such interests, the developer may petition the City Council for adoption of a resolution initiating eminent domain proceedings over the lands needed for the off-site improvements. The developer shall bear all costs for such proceedings, including attorney fees, court costs, and land-value costs.

6. Prior to issuance of a grading or building permit, the developer shall secure approval of improvement plans for all public- and private-street, utility, and drainage infrastructure from the City Engineer. Unless otherwise noted herein, all public- and private-street, storm-drain, and utility improvements required of the subdivision shall comply with City Public Works Construction Standards or equivalent standards as approved by the City Engineer or affected private-utility company.

7. A use permit approval is necessary for development of Phase 6 (15-unit townhouse site).

Site development requirements for this component of the PD will be established with approval of the use permit.

8. This condition shall be recorded on the final map and noted in the title report. The escrow instructions for the sale of each lot shall require that the purchaser and seller sign a statement that they have read and understand this condition of sale. The property Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 2
owner(s) shall consent to the formation or annexation into an existing district and participation in a landscape maintenance district for the following:** a. Irrigation, landscape, and arterial wall within the public right-of way of Shasta View Drive. This will also include maintenance of interim median and rough shoulders north of project boundary to Rancho road.
b. All subdivision entrance features and monument identification located within the public right-of-way.

c. Stormwater detention facilities.
d. Stormwater treatment facilities and erosion-control measures.

9. Said district shall be formed in accordance with the following:
a. Prior to recordation of a final map, the property owner(s) shall submit a landscape maintenance district petition and consent form, a landscape maintenance agreement form, and applicable application fees to the Development Services Department to be annexed into the existing Shastina Ranch Landscape Maintenance District.
b. The landscape and associated irrigation plan for the district shall be designed in accordance with the specifications available from the Development Services Department and installed in accordance with the final plans as approved by the City. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Development Services Department at the time the subdivision improvement plans are submitted to the Engineering Division and are subject to approval prior to recordation of a final map.
c. The irrigation system and landscape shall be installed and accepted by the City in conjunction with the public improvements within the subdivision. d. The developer shall be responsible for all costs and fees associated with the formation, installation, and connection to City of Redding Electric and water utilities. Such fees include, but are not necessarily limited to, formation costs, meter fees, connection charges, benefit fees, inspection fees, and development fees. The developer shall also be responsible for maintenance of the landscape and irrigation system until such time as the district is formed and fees are levied.

The minimum maintenance responsibility shall be 90 days for plant material and 1 year for the irrigation system from the date improvements are accepted by the City.

Site Design Requirements

10. Lot configuration and development shall comply with the requirements of the Planned Development applied to the property in accordance with Chapter 18 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Redding Municipal Code.**
Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 3
Streets and Circulation

11. The developer shall install a traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho Road and Shasta View Drive and modify the lane geometrics of the intersection, this shall be completed when the traffic study indicates the signal is warranted and the City Engineer concurs that the warrants are met for phased map being requested. Improvements shall include all necessary wiring and installation of hardware (radar detection, indicator heads, buttons) and street striping for the traffic signal to respond to pedestrian or vehicle-phase request.

Intersection improvements shall include any necessary modifications to the existing Shasta View Drive north of Rancho Road and Rancho Road east and west of Shasta View Drive to accommodate the signal. At a minimum; the signal will be required in conjunction with development of the 101st lot, due to the requirement of the connection on Shasta View Drive.

12. A maximum of 100 lots may be recorded with a single access provided by an extension of Shasta View Drive from Rancho Road, based upon the following:
a. Shasta View Drive shall be constructed with a 3-lane section (1 inbound; 2 outbound).
b. Upon recordation of the 101st lot, the connection into the Shastina Ranch Subdivision east of Clover Creek shall be made along Shasta View Drive and shall be provided in a manner approved by the Fire Marshal, including the necessary crossing at Clover Creek.**
c. The second outbound lane in Shasta View Drive shall be converted to the landscape median required by other conditions of the tentative map approval at the time the Shasta View Drive connection between Airport Road and Rancho Road is completed.
d. No internal street shall exceed a dead-end length of 600 feet as a result of phasing the development.

13. Shasta View Drive shall be designed based upon a 35-mile-per-hour design speed, minimum centerline radius of 800 feet, minimum tangent between reverse curves of 100 feet, and meeting sight-distance standards at all intersections. Necessary right-of-way shall be dedicated to the public generally on the alignment delineated on the tentative map for the section between Rancho Road and the south subdivision boundary and based upon the Shastina Ranch Subdivision improvement plans for the section between the south subdivision boundary and Airport Road.

14. Intersection of Hartmeyer Lane and Churn Creek Road - The City shall collect an appropriate proportionate contribution towards implementation of the mitigation and coordinate with Shasta County for funding and implementation. This will be in the form of a fair share cost of the improvement based on the 7.7% fair share calculation. The final number will be determined at map recordation based on the final approved number of lots for the Stonecreek Subdivision. The fee will be due upon payment of building permit fees for each residential unit. **
Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 4

15. Adjacent to the project site, Shasta View Drive shall be constructed to the following standard:
a. Dedication of a 96-foot right-of-way
b. A 12-foot-wide landscape median, two 12-foot-wide travel lanes, 6-foot-wide paved shoulders, and vertical curb and gutter on the west side symmetrical to the ultimate centerline.
c. A 10-foot-wide, 4-inch-thick meandering concrete pedestrian/bicycle path and landscape parkway between the curb and right-of-way boundary on both sides of the roadway. The path shall be constructed at a location and elevation based upon a separation of a minimum of four feet from the curb line. d. Turn lanes at all intersections as specified by the City Engineer in conformance with standard engineering practice.
e. Arterial wall and landscape improvements required by other conditions of this entitlement. Along the frontage of residences, it may be waived when adjacent to Open Space areas.

16. Rancho Road shall be improved as follows, traffic control, striping and signage, turn lanes, and acceleration and deceleration lanes, tie-in paving, and AC overlay to provide for conformance to the existing roadway at the intersection of Rancho Road and Shasta View Drive as approved by the City Engineer. The intersection design was approved with the Stonesfair Project and is currently under construction. At the time of the signal installation the improvement plans will be reviewed by the City Engineer and confirm that the required widening is adequate to accommodate the traffic signal.

17. Bus-stop turnouts and passenger shelters for Redding Area Bus Authority (RABA) service shall be incorporated into the on-site improvement of Shasta View Drive in locations specified by RABA. Improvements shall be in accordance with City of Redding Construction Standard 120.00.

18. Individual lot access rights to and from Shasta View Drive shall be waived.

19. A minimum 6-foot-high masonry sound wall shall be constructed at the boundary of the Shasta View Drive right-of-way adjacent to all residential lots. The wall shall be constructed of decorative masonry materials that have a density of 4 pounds per square foot. The wall design shall incorporate materials providing 2 distinct surface reliefs, columns/pilasters articulated a minimum of 2 inches from the face of the wall, and a cap feature. The wall will need to wrap around the rear of the residential lots if they back up to open space sections adjacent to Shasta View Drive. The wall aesthetic design shall be approved by the Development Services Director.*

20. Internal public streets shall be constructed generally as follows:
a. All Internal Streets
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 5
(1) 56-foot-wide right-of-way an abutting 5-foot-wide pubic service easement. (2) 36-foot-wide curb-face to curb-face street section. (3) Rolled or vertical curb, gutter, and 5-foot-wide sidewalk on both sides.

A decorative roundabout, curb-line bulbouts, or other traffic-calming feature at the intersections, as determined by the City Engineer, and agreed to by the developer.

21. Construction access to the site shall be identified on the project improvement plans.

Temporary or permanent traffic-control and access improvements or measures shall be provided as required by the City Engineer.

Sewer, Water, and Electric Utilities

22. No unit or phase of the subdivision shall be recorded unless it is contiguous to an improved public street and sewer, water, electrical, and drainage facilities adequate to serve the property have been extended to the unit or phase boundary. The sewer and water lines shall be located in the Shasta View Drive right-of-way so at grade access points are located in the roundabout aprons and outside of the primary vehicle path of travel.

23. Sanitary sewer, water, electric, natural gas, communication, and cable-distribution lines, including main lines and service laterals, shall be extended and sized to serve each lot in the subdivision to provide logical extensions of service to adjacent properties. These utilities shall be installed in accordance with the capacity, construction, and testing standards of the City or other responsible agency or utility.

24. Sewer lines within the subdivision shall be sized as necessary to accommodate upstream development in an orderly fashion.

25. Water service within the subdivision and fire hydrants shall be provided in accordance with the specifications of the Engineering Division and in a manner satisfying the California Fire Code. All fire hydrants must have a minimum fire flow meeting Appendix B of the California Fire Code, plus meet the maximum daily demand for the area. Fire-hydrant locations shall be approved by the City Fire Marshal and a blue reflective marker placed on the streets indicating hydrant locations.

26. All on-site and off-site sewer, water, electrical, storm-drain and other public-utility infrastructure shall be placed in a public-street right-of-way or public-service easement in a location approved by the Engineering Division. The developer shall be responsible for acquisition of all necessary off-site right-of-ways or easements.

27. Vehicular access for maintenance purposes shall be provided to all utility infrastructure outside a public right-of-way as determined necessary by and in a manner approved by the City Engineer and the developer. The rear fence for lots that are adjacent to the Utility Easement along the easterly border shall be located at the westerly easement line providing 15’ minimum clear access at the power pole or other above ground obstruction Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 6
or from the property line. In addition lots 89-95 shall stay clear of the 10’ public service easement at the rear of the lots and not include any cross fencing.

28. Before approval of the final improvement plans by the Engineering Division for plan check, the applicant shall also incorporate 1 copy of the City of Redding Electric Department plans for providing electric service.

29. Electric-supply facilities shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the Electric Utility Service Policy Resolution currently in effect at the time the developer’s plans are approved by the City of Redding.

30. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the relocation or modification of utility facilities necessitated by the construction of improvements required as a condition of approval of this project, including reimbursement to City of Redding Electric Utility. Other utilities may require reimbursement for project-related costs as well.

31. The final subdivision map(s) shall indicate minimum building setback lines necessary to comply with Redding Electric Utility (REU) standards for structure clearance from padmounted transformers; the setback shall be indicated only on those lots where the setback requirement of the City Zoning Ordinance will not satisfy the REU standard.

32. The existing Redding Electric Utility 115/12kV transmission-line easement shall be identified on the final map(s).

Grading, Drainage, and Water Quality

33. An application shall be submitted to the City Engineer for a clearing and/or grading permit. Improvement plans for clearing, grading, drainage, utilities, and other required improvements shall be approved by the Engineering Division and other concerned City of Redding departments prior to the beginning of any clearing or grading activities or site improvement activities and will be in conformance to Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Title 16.12. An Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall be included as part of the clearing and grading permit applications and will be approved by the City Engineer before a clearing and/or grading permit will be issued. "As-built" improvement plans with the Engineer’s Declaration are required in conformance with RMC 16.12.230.

34. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the developer shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and secure a Construction Activity Storm Water Permit from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), if required by law. Additionally, all applicable provisions of the City of Redding Grading Ordinance (Redding Municipal Code Chapter 16.12) shall be met. This will require in part that an Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan be prepared that establishes specific measures and Best Management Practices to minimize soil erosion during and after construction activities.

Approval and installation of interim erosion- and sediment-control measures shall be coordinated with the sequence of grading and development so as to be in place by September 1 of any year. The details of the Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan and any applicable water quality mitigation requirements of the RWQCB shall be Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 7
incorporated into the final project improvement plans and be fully implemented by the developer as approved by the City Engineer.

35. Prior to improvement-plan approval, the applicant shall obtain approval for storm-water peak flow in accordance with City Council Policy 1806 and the specifications of the Engineering Division. Such measures shall address impacts from the 10-, 25-, and 100- year-storm events. Projects shall address peak flows to maintain predevelopment levels at all locations downstream of the project. A hydrological drainage report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer and will be provided to the Engineering Division with submittal of site improvement plans.

36. All drainage outlets into Clover Creek or any other natural drainage feature are to incorporate water-velocity-attenuation and sedimentation devices to minimize erosion or shall be extended so as to discharge without eroding the natural channel. The storm-drain outlets are to be extended so as to discharge into a defined channel; the developer shall cause the dedication of any off-site easements necessary to accommodate the extension and provide maintenance access as required by the Engineering Division. The outlet shall include a concrete headwall with wing walls, a smooth concrete apron, and watervelocity-attenuation devices to minimize erosion. If plastic storm-drain pipe is used, a minimum of 10 feet of concrete pipe shall be placed immediately upstream of the outlet.

37. Drainage systems shall be designed and installed so that runoff collected from roof drains and other improvements are conveyed directly to the street or other acceptable drainage system with no lot-to-lot drainage allowed, unless approved by the City Engineer. The minimum grade of all lots, either toward the street or open space, shall be 2 percent.

38. Project development shall incorporate storm-water quality provisions set forth in the City’s Storm Water Quality Improvement Plan and the statewide general permit (Water Quality Order No. 2003-0005-DWQ). Best Management Practices (BMPs) tailored to the project to maximize the reduction of pollutant loading in storm-water runoff shall be implemented to the maximum extent practicable.

39. In compliance with the requirements of the State General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit, the project developer shall prepare a site and construction-phase-specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in conformance with the California Storm Water Quality Association Construction Handbook. The SWPPP shall be subject to the approval of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board and incorporated into the project improvement plans. Best Management Practices (BMPs) incorporated into the SWPPP shall be utilized in all project-site development activities.

Water quality controls will ensure no increase in turbidity, sediment, or other pollutant loads into Clover Creek or Churn Creek over predevelopment conditions and that the storm-water discharges are in compliance with all current requirements of the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. The developer shall retain a licensed or certified engineering or erosion-control professional to prepare the SWPPP. A copy of the SWPPP shall be provided to the City.

40. Storm-drain facilities within both the on-site and off-site sections of Shasta View Drive shall be designed and constructed to accommodate the road way. These facilities may be a combination of surface and subsurface conveyance systems as appropriate to meet City Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 8
Standards. The storm-drain system shall incorporate filtration, utilizing the parkway between the curb and right-of-way boundary of Shasta View Drive.

41. Storm drain facilities shall have structures at all changes in direction.

Biological Resources

42. Construction activities resulting in vegetation removal shall be avoided during the breeding season for migratory and/or special-status birds. If trees greater than 6 inches dbh must be removed during the nesting season (February 28 through September 1), a migratory bird-nesting survey shall be conducted by a qualified wildlife biologist prior to initiation of clearing. If active nests are present, they shall not be disturbed until the young birds are fully fledged.*
Fire Protection

43. Prior to any vertical construction, a 20-foot-wide all-weather-surface road shall be constructed and remain serviceable to all developing lots and fire hydrants installed with adequate fire flows available for fire-suppression purposes.

44. Brush piles created by project development shall be abated prior to the fire season.

Parks, Schools, and Tree Preservation

45. With the recordation of a final map for the first phase of development, the developer shall perform the following:
a. Make an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City in fee simple absolute of a minimum of 2.55 acres within the 6.1 acres “School/Park Dedication” area depicted on the tentative map. The location and configuration of the dedication shall be determined by the City of Redding.
b. With recordation of a final map for the first phase of development, the developer shall reserve for acquisition by the Pacheco Elementary School District in fee simple absolute approximately 3.55 acres within the 6.1 acres “School/Park Dedication” area depicted on the tentative map for a public school site in accordance with Chapter 17.41 of the Redding Municipal Code and Sections 66479 through 66481 of the State Subdivision Map Act. The location and configuration of the dedication shall be determined by the City of Redding.

46. Project-grading and improvement plans shall reflect the preservation of the 3 existing trees identified on the tentative map outside of the open space preserve areas and accompanying tree-preservation plan. All preservation techniques delineated on the treepreservation plan shall be implemented in addition to the following:
a. Improvement plans must contain verification from a certified arborist that the proposed construction and grading methods will not have a significant adverse effect on the trees to be preserved. No grading or excavation shall take place within the drip lines of the existing oak trees unless otherwise approved by the Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 9
Planning Division during improvement-plan review (e.g., encroachments necessary for the installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk and to facilitate reasonable placement of the residential structures on the properties). b. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, construction fencing shall be installed around the drip lines of preserved trees, except where required improvements are within the drip lines. The placement of the construction fencing shall be confirmed in the field at a preconstruction meeting with Development Services Department staff.*
c. Any future removal of oak trees designated for preservation by this map shall require the issuance of a tree-removal permit by the Development Services Department. The following notation shall be placed on the recorded final map. "A deed restriction shall be placed on all lots containing a "preserved" tree as determined on final grading and improvement plans, stating that removal of an oak tree shall require the issuance of a tree-removal permit by the City of Redding Development Services Department.**
Archaeology

47. If, during the course of project implementation, cultural resources (i.e., prehistoric sites, historic sites, and isolated artifacts and features) are discovered, work shall be halted immediately within 50 feet of the discovery, the City of Redding Development Services Department shall be immediately notified, and a professional archaeologist that meets the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualifications Standards in prehistoric or historical archaeology shall be retained to determine the significance of the discovery.

The City shall consider mitigation recommendations presented by a professional archaeologist and implement a measure or measures that the City deems feasible and appropriate. Such measures may include avoidance, preservation in place, excavation documentation, curation, data recovery, or other appropriate measures.*

48. Prior to the commencement of project ground-disturbing activities, all construction personnel shall be informed of the type(s) of cultural resources that might be inadvertently uncovered in the area and protocols to be implemented to protect Native American human remains and any subsurface cultural resources.*

49. If human remains are discovered, all work must stop in the immediate vicinity of the find, and the County Coroner must be notified, according to Section 5097.98 of the State Public Resources Code and Section 7050.5 of California’s Health and Safety Code. If the remains are determined to be Native American, the coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission, and the procedures outlined in CEQA Section 15064.5(d) and (e) shall be followed.*
Noise

50. A sound wall shall be constructed along Shasta View Drive as specified under Streets and Circulation.*
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 10

51. Construction within the project area shall be restricted to the hours allowed by Chapter

18.40.100 of the Redding Zoning Ordinance.*
Air Quality

52. City of Redding recommended Standard and Best Available Mitigation Measures shall be implemented in accordance with the Air Quality Element of the Redding General Plan.

These measures include, but are not limited to, the following:* a. Provide energy-efficient process systems, such as water heaters, furnaces, and boiler units.
b. Apply nontoxic soil stabilizers according to manufacturer’s specification to al inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more). c. Reestablish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering prior to final occupancy.
d. All grading operations of a project shall be suspended when winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 miles per hour.
e. All new wood-burning devices shall be EPA Phase II certified. f. Streets should be designed to maximize pedestrian access to transit stops. g. Large residential, commercial, and industrial project should include bus shelters at transit access points.
h. Provide temporary traffic control as appropriate during all phases of construction to improve traffic flow.
i. Schedule construction activities that affect traffic flow to off-peak hours. j. Water active construction sites at least twice daily as directed by the Public Works Department.
k. All trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials should be covered or should maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical distance between top of the load and the trailer) in accordance with the requirements of CVC Section 23114. This provision is enforced by local law enforcement agencies.
l. Sweep streets at the end of the day if visible soil materials are carried onto adjacent public paved roads (recommend water sweeper with reclaimed water). m. Install wheel washers where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the site each trip.

Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 11
n. Contribute to traffic-flow improvements that reduce emissions and are not growth-inducing.
o. Install an electrical outlet at the front and back of all residential units for electrical yard equipment.

Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 12

STANDARD CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR SUBDIVISIONS
EFFECTIVE MAY 24, 2011
In accordance with City of Redding Ordinance 2469, Section 26, the following standard conditions of approval apply to all subdivision projects requiring a final map. Project-specific conditions of approval will take precedence in the event of a conflict with standard conditions.

References to the Grading Ordinance are based on Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Title 16, Chapter 12. References to the Subdivision Ordinance are based on RMC Title 17. References to the Zoning Ordinance are based on RMC Title 18.

FINAL MAP

1. A final map shall be prepared in accordance with Chapter 17.40 of the Subdivision Ordinance. The final map and all necessary supporting documents and information must be filed with the City Engineer prior to the expiration date of the tentative map as required by Section 17.40.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance.

2. In accordance with Chapter 17.50 of the Subdivision Ordinance, the property owner shall dedicate to the City all right-of-ways and easements necessary to provide public access and utilities to the subdivision as required by the tentative map approval.

3. Prior to the recording of a final map, a complete application shall be submitted to the City to apportion any special assessment-district lien (Improvement Bond Act of 1915) affected by the subdivision, including the applicable fees, an assessment segregation diagram, and any required additional information.

4. In-lieu park fees must be paid prior to the recording of the final map in accordance with Chapter 17.54 of the Subdivision Ordinance, unless an equivalent parkland dedication is made in conformance with the tentative map approval.

5. Proposed street names must be submitted for City and agency review in accordance with Section 17.64.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance prior to the recording of the final map.

The final map shall reflect only street names approved by the City.

6. A 5-foot-wide public-service easement shall be dedicated on the final map abutting all public-street right-of-ways within the subdivision.

7. In the case where a regulatory floodplain exists on a subdivision site, the final map shall clearly delineate the limits of the 100-year base floodplain and elevations. The floodplain identified on the final map shall be consistent with Section 18.51.020, Basis for Establishing Areas of Special Flood Hazard, of the Zoning Ordinance.

8. For residential subdivisions, covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be recorded in conjunction with recordation of a final map which prohibit the storage of recreational vehicles in the front-yard or street side-yard-setback areas as described in Schedule 18.31.030-C(8) of the Zoning Ordinance.

Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 13

CONSTRUCTION - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

9. In accordance with Chapter 17.70 of the Subdivision Ordinance, the developer must secure approval of subdivision improvement plans for grading and all street, utility, and drainage infrastructure from the City Engineer prior to the start of any construction.

Subdivision improvement plans must be prepared by a registered civil engineer and fully address the construction of all improvements required of the subdivision under the approved tentative map.

10. Acquisition of all off-site interests in title or easements necessary to satisfy the requirements of the subdivision approval shall be the responsibility of the developer. In the event the developer is unable to acquire such interests, the developer may petition the City Council for adoption of a resolution initiating eminent-domain proceedings over the lands needed for the off-site improvements. The developer shall bear all costs for such proceedings, including attorney fees, court costs, and land-value costs.

11. Unless a project-specific development standard is identified and approved for the subdivision project with the tentative map, all public improvements required of the subdivision shall comply with City Construction Standards and other adopted standards specified under Section 17.70.020 of the Subdivision Ordinance and/or equivalent standards, as determined necessary by the City Engineer.

12. Prior to approval of subdivision improvement plans and issuance of a grading permit, the property owner shall secure all other necessary permits/approvals required by law from outside agencies also having jurisdiction over the project, including, but not limited to:
a. Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). In most cases, the developer must prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan and secure a Construction Activity Storm Water Permit from RWQCB.
b. Department of Fish and Game (DFG). Where a project would impact a waterway, a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement must be finalized with DFG.
c. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE). Where a project would impact jurisdictional waters of the U.S., appropriate Nationwide or Individual Permit approvals shall be obtained from ACOE.

Copies of required agency permits/approvals shall be submitted to the City Engineer.

Any special development requirements of these agencies affecting improvements within the subdivision shall be reflected on the final improvement plans.

13. Required subdivision improvements shall be properly and fully constructed, inspected, and accepted by the City in accordance with Chapter 17.74 of the Subdivision Ordinance.

Any incomplete improvements shall be secured under the provisions of Schedule

17.40.060.B and Chapter 17.74 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Final survey, as-built improvement plans, and related engineering certifications are required at the completion of work in conformance with Sections 17.70.070 and 17.70.080 of the Subdivision Ordinance and Section 16.12.230 of the Grading Ordinance.

Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 14

CONSTRUCTION - STANDARD IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
Grading, Erosion Control, Tree Preservation

14. Subdivision clearing, grading, and erosion-control plans shall be in full conformance with the Grading Ordinance. The final grading improvement plans shall be consistent with the preliminary grading plan and any tree-preservation plans considered with the approved tentative map.

15. The project developer shall prepare a site and construction-phase-specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and secure a Construction Activity Storm Water Permit from the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board in compliance with the requirements of the State General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit.

Best Management Practices (BMPs) prescribed in the SWPPP shall be utilized and followed in all project site-development activities.

16. All trees identified for preservation shall be clearly identified on the subdivision improvement plans. A tree construction/protection plan shall be prepared by a qualified (tree) professional in accordance with Chapter 18.45, Tree Management, of the Zoning Ordinance and included as part of the subdivision grading improvement-plan package.

Tree-protection measures identified in the tree construction/protection plan shall be reflected in the final subdivision improvement plans and followed during construction.

Drainage System

17. Storm-drain facilities shall be designed consistent with the requirements of City Construction Standards, the City of Redding Storm Water Quality Improvement Plan, and the City of Redding Phase II NPDES Permit from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Water Quality Order No. 2003–05 - DWQ). Project design shall incorporate Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize the polluting of stormwater, both during construction and long-term. Should the maintenance costs of the long-term pollution-control measures exceed typical storm-drain-system costs, such costs shall be borne by the project by way of a landscape maintenance district, escrow account, or other such financing mechanism.

18. Prior to improvement-plan approval, the developer must obtain approval for proper management of stormwater peak flows in accordance with City Council Policy 1806 and the specifications of the City Engineer. Such measures shall address impacts from the 10-, 25-, and 100-year-storm events. Projects shall address peak flows to maintain predevelopment levels at all locations downstream of the project. A drainage report shall be prepared to the format outlined by the Engineering Division, stamped and signed by a qualified engineer, and provided to the Engineering Division with submittal of project improvement plans.

Utilities

19. Essential utilities, including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer, water, electric, natural gas, and communication distribution lines, including main lines and service laterals, shall be extended and sized appropriately to serve each lot and to provide logical extensions of Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 15
service to subsequent phases and adjacent properties in accordance with Section 17.60.080 of the Subdivision Ordinance. These utilities shall be installed in accordance with the capacity, construction, metering, and testing standards of the City and other involved private utility company(s), including applicable utility master plans.

20. Any necessary off-site utility extensions shall be placed in a public-street right-of-way or public-service easement in a location approved by the City Engineer and other responsible utility companies. Vehicular access for maintenance purposes shall be provided to all utility infrastructure outside a public right-of-way as determined necessary by, and in a manner approved by, the City Engineer.

21. New "dry" utilities, including electric, telephone, and cable television, must be installed underground in accordance with Section 17.60.090 of the Subdivision Ordinance. Any existing overhead facilities within a proposed subdivision and along peripheral streets must also be placed underground, unless waived under the project-specific conditions.

22. Electric-supply facilities shall be furnished and installed in accordance with the Redding Electric Utility Service Policy Resolution currently in effect at the time the developer's plans are approved by the City.

23. The developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the relocation or modification of existing utility facilities or structures necessitated by the construction of the project or of improvements required as a condition of approval of this project, including reimbursement of any costs to the affected utility for work performed to support the project.

24. After the initial review of project improvement plans by the Engineering Division, the developer shall consult with the Redding Electric Utility (REU) for preparation of an electric-service plan. A copy of the electric-service plan, developed and approved by REU, shall be incorporated into the final improvement plans.

25. Streetlights shall be provided in accordance with applicable Redding Electric Utility Construction Standards 553.0, et seq.

Fire Department

26. Fire hydrants shall be installed at locations throughout the subdivision in accordance with the California Fire Code as approved by the Fire Marshal. All fire hydrants shall have a minimum fire flow meeting Appendix-B of the California Fire Code and meet the maximum daily demand for the area. "On-lot" hydrants and necessary easements to service development on flag lots or oversized lots shall also be installed as required by the Fire Marshal.

27. Brush piles resulting from land-clearing activity shall be fully removed from the site prior to the start of the fire season or, if generated during fire season, be removed immediately.

Air Quality

28. The following Air Quality Element Standard Mitigation Measures shall be applied during grading and construction activities to control dust and PM10 emissions:

Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 16
a. Nontoxic soil stabilizers shall be applied according to manufacturer’s specifications to all inactive construction areas (previously graded areas inactive for 10 days or more).
b. All grading operations may be suspended by the City Engineer when winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 miles per hour.
c. Temporary traffic control shall be provided as appropriate during all phases of construction to improve traffic flow (e.g., flag person). d. Construction activities that could affect traffic flow shall be scheduled in off-peak hours.
e. Active construction areas, haul roads, etc., shall be watered at least twice daily or more as needed to limit dust.
f. Exposed stockpiles of soil and other backfill material shall either be covered, watered, or have soil binders added to inhibit dust and wind erosion. g. All trucks hauling soil and other loose material shall be covered or should maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical distance between top of the load and the trailer) in accordance with the requirements of CVC Section 23114. This provision is enforced by local law enforcement agencies. h. All public roadways used by the project contractor shall be maintained free from dust, dirt, and debris caused by construction activities. Streets shall be swept at the end of the day if visible soil materials are carried onto adjacent public paved roads. Wheel washers shall be used where vehicles enter and exit unpaved roads onto paved roads, or trucks and any equipment shall be washed off leaving the site with each trip. i. Alternatives to open burning of cleared vegetative material on the project site shall be used, unless otherwise approved by the Planning Division, Fire Marshal, and Shasta County Air Quality Management District. Suitable alternatives include, but are not limited to, on-site chipping and mulching and/or hauling to a biomass fuel site.

Cultural Resources

29. If, during the course of development, any archaeological, historical, or paleontological resources are uncovered or otherwise detected or observed, construction activities in the area affected shall cease and the City shall be notified immediately. A qualified archaeological professional must then be retained by the developer to investigate the discovered cultural object to determine its significance. If the cultural object is deemed potentially significant by the archaeologist, appropriate treatment and measures shall be followed in accordance with applicable laws, as reviewed and approved by the City, prior to the resumption of work in the affected area.

Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) S-2019-00280 Stonecreek Subdivision November 13, 2019
Draft Conditions of Approval Page 17
Miscellaneous

30. Issuance of building permits for structures on lots resulting from the subdivision will not occur until a final map is recorded and necessary public-street and utility improvements are available. An exception may be granted at the discretion of the Building Official allowing issuance of a building permit for the construction of model homes and other special circumstances in accordance with Section 17.04.090 of the Subdivision Ordinance.

31. Permanent and temporary signs related to the subdivision shall comply with Chapter 18.42 of the Zoning Ordinance.

32. In the event of any confusion, conflict, vagueness, typographical error, or special circumstance where implementation of any standard or project-specific condition is in question, the Development Services Director has the authority, in accordance with Section

17.04.080 of the Subdivision Ordinance, to determine an appropriate remedy as necessary to ensure that the intent of the condition and related tentative map approval is met in accordance with applicable laws and policies, and as necessary to ensure orderly development.

33. The developer/applicant shall note that pursuant to Chapter 16.20 of the Redding Municipal Code, City development impact fees are required to be paid at the time of building occupancy/final inspection for new construction, building enlargement, or other improvement. These fees are structured to mitigate the project's fair share of cumulative impacts to the City's transportation, fire-suppression, utility, and parks infrastructure systems based upon necessary improvements to accommodate new development under the City's General Plan. The developer/applicant is hereby notified that he/she has the right to protest/appeal imposition of any of these fees or fee amounts. Any protest/appeal must comply with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020(a).* Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Draft Conditions of Approval (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO REDDING PLANNING COMMISSION
Recommendation
Conduct a public hearing and, upon conclusion, recommend that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and approve the Stonecreek Subdivision and Planned Development project consisting of Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-2019-00280, Planned Development Plan Application PD-2019-00309, and Rezoning Application RZ-2019- 00314.

Project Description
Planned Development Subdivision. Sierra Pacific Land and Timber is requesting approval to subdivide approximately 61.6 acres to develop 218 single family residences. The applicant is proposing to develop the subdivision in six phases. Phase 1 and 3 consist of 108 lots total to be developed with attached single family homes. Phase 2, 4 and 5 consists of 95 single family lots with a mix of 60-foot and 70-foot wide lots. Phase 6 is a future phase which will require future entitlements. A homeowners’ association would be formed to address common ownership and maintenance needs for the attached single family portion of the project.

Rezoning. The project site is zoned “RS-3” Residential Single Family District. The application includes a rezoning request to add the “PD” Planned Development Overlay District to the property. The subdivision would be developed under a Planned Development Plan in accordance with Chapter 18.53 of the Zoning Code to allow density averaging and a reduction of standard lot sizes to allow 108 of the homes to be constructed as attached single family homes in a courtyard style development on approximately 4,000 square-foot lots.

MEETING DATE: October 22, 2019
ITEM NO.

FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(b)3--Stonecreek Subdivision S-2019-00280, Planned Development PD-2019- 00309 and Rezone Application RZ-2019-00314, by Sierra Pacific Land and Timber, requesting approval of a tentative subdivision map and planned development plan to divide 61.6 acres into 218 lots for single-family residences on property located at 2923 and 2873 Rancho Road. The project includes a rezoning to add the "PD" Planned Development Overlay District to the existing "RS-3" Residential Single Family District.

Zach Bonnin, Associate
Planner
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Planning Commision Staff Report (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/PlannedPacket Pg. 321 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Report to Redding Planning Commission October 18, 2019
Re: 4(b)3--Public Hearing, Stonecreek Subdivision and Planned Development Page 2 PARCEL SIZE 61.6 acres
TERRAIN/VEGETATION Relatively level with slight changes in the elevation range, the vegetation is grassland with a few scattered large oak trees.

EXISTING LAND USE Undeveloped ranchland
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION “Residential, 2 to 3.5 units per acre." The project density is 3.5 units per acre. The General Plan also identifies a school site and neighborhood park site in this general area.

ZONING DESIGNATION “RS-3” Single Family Residential District

SURROUNDING LAND USES
North: Rancho Road and residential developments along Shasta View Drive East: Clover Creek Open Space area and a few large single family residential lots South: Stonesfair Subdivision, currently under construction West: Large single family lots with a few undeveloped ranch parcels further south Background
This project represents development anticipated by the General Plan and the more specific development pattern considered by the Commission and City Council upon review and approval of the Shastina Ranch Planned Development in 2005. The Commission approved the original alignment of Shasta View Drive with the Shastina Ranch project, a location for the Pacheco Elementary School site and a new City park site. Since approval of the Shastina Ranch Development and the Stonefair development more extensive work has been completed to determine the ultimate alignment of Shasta View Drive which differs from the original plan. The major utilities through the area have been installed with the development of Shasta View Drive and the school site and park site have been established.

Planned Development Process. Chapter 18.53 ("PD" Planned Development District) of the Zoning Code provides a process, or "zoning tool," that can be used where greater flexibility in design is desired to allow a more efficient use of land than would be possible through strict application of conventional zoning standards. The PD process can be used to customize use and development standards to fit a project, as long as specific findings can be made, which largely center on consistency with the General Plan. PD projects are also expected to provide appropriate amenities and design enhancements, thus providing something extra/unique to support justification for variation from standards.

To be eligible for the PD process, a site must be zoned to include "PD" as an overlay district.

Preparation of a Planned Development Plan, such as that attached, is required to illustrate the standards that are specific to the project. In this case, the proposed subdivision must incorporate the "PD" Overlay District with the "RS" District allow density averaging and a reduction of standard lot sizes to allow 108 of the homes to be constructed as attached single family homes in a courtyard style development on approximately 4,000 square-foot lots..

Design Concept. The planned development would allow density averaging and a reduction of standard lot sizes based on the following amenities:

Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Planning Commision Staff Report (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/PlannedPacket Pg. 322 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Report to Redding Planning Commission October 18, 2019
Re: 4(b)3--Public Hearing, Stonecreek Subdivision and Planned Development Page 3  A mix of four different types of lot sizes ranging from large lots 70-foot wide down through medium and small lots to attached single family lots as small as 40-foot wide.  Varying home designs that have a mix of two-story attached single family homes and single story detached homes.
 Shasta View Drive is proposed to have large parkways on both sides of the road with 10-foot wide mixed-use paths that accommodate all users. The paths will connect into the neighborhoods, the school site, the Clover Creek Open Space area, the detention basin recreation area and the Shastina park site south of the project site.  Shasta View is designed with a traffic circle for traffic calming at the Street “H” intersection.
 The project includes 14 acres of open space that will preserve wetlands and a few large oak trees and some of the original character of the site.  The project site includes 6.1 acres to be dedicated as a school site.

Issues
General Plan Consistency. The proposed subdivision supports 218 units over a gross developable area. This represents a density of 3.5 units per acre, which is the maximum density allowed by the General Plan classification which is 2 to 3.5 dwelling units per acre. Overall, staff feels the project advances General Plan Community Development and Design Element (CDD) Goal 11 and Policy 11D, to ensure new residential developments are well-located and well designed with a mix of residential density and dwelling types and CDD Goal 12 and Policy 12A, to ensure attractive, safe, and well-maintained neighborhoods by promoting neighborhood quality though project amenities and establishment of a homeowners' association.

Shasta View Drive. As mentioned above, the alignment of Shasta View Drive has been amended since the original approval in 2005. The Planning Commission approved the amendment to the Stonefair map in 2018 to allow for the new alignment. The alignment has shifted to the west to avoid substantial environmental impacts and to allow for better drainage and traffic flow around the proposed school site. This amendment also allowed the smaller right of way width proposed of 96 feet instead of the original design of a 142-foot wide street section.

The City determined that the ultimate design of a five-lane arterial section will likely not be necessary even though a 96-foot right-of-way width is the standard width required for a five-lane arterial if it did become necessary in the future. The current three-lane design will handle traffic into foreseeable future and will allow for wide landscape strips on both sides of the roadway and 10-foot wide side paths. Shasta View Drive through the project is already under construction as part of the Stonesfair project, however, the Stonecreek subdivision will be required to pave the side paths and landscape the street section through the subdivision.

Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Planning Commision Staff Report (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/PlannedPacket Pg. 323 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Report to Redding Planning Commission October 18, 2019
Re: 4(b)3--Public Hearing, Stonecreek Subdivision and Planned Development Page 4 Traffic Impact Improvements.

Rancho Road and Shasta View Intersection -A traffic study prepared for the project concludes that immediate signalization or equivalent improvements is not necessary at the intersection of Rancho Road and Shasta View Drive. However, the intersection will be need to be signalized if more than 100 lots are recorded with primary access south of this intersection. If a map is proposed south of this intersection that exceeds the 100 lots in any combination of all the subdivisions (Shastina Ranch, Stonesfair, and Stonecreek), the road connection and the traffic signal will be required.

Hartmeyer Lane and Churn Creek Road Intersection - The intersection of Hartmeyer Lane and Churn Creek Road has recently been identified as deficient with the Churn Creek Marketplace development and the other proposed developments in the area. A fund has been established to improve this intersection and the City is collecting funds toward the future improvement. The traffic study identified that this development will contribute 7.7 percent as its fair share of the overall improvement to this intersection. The payment of these fees will be due at the time of development of each home.

Churn Creek Road/Victor Avenue/Rancho Road Intersection - The Churn Creek Road/Victor Avenue/Rancho Road intersection is currently experiencing a substandard level of service. The Shastina Ranch environmental impact report first recognized the development potential along the Rancho Road corridor and the need to mitigate traffic impacts at the Chum Creek Road/Victor Avenue/Rancho Road intersection. A few other developments in the area have also identified the need to improve this intersection. A plan is in place to develop a round-about at this intersection that will be funded with Traffic Impact Fees (TIF). This subdivision will help add to the TIF collected for this improvement.

Circulation Improvements on Shasta View Drive. This tentative map will address the development of the Shasta View Drive extension from Rancho Road to Airport Road, thereby connecting all of the Shastina Ranch Development. This connection necessitates a bridge crossing across Clover Creek. This circulation connection has been necessary for a variety of reasons, however, the main reason is for the required emergency evacuation route. The lots on the east side of Clover Creek are limited to the existing 119 recorded lots until such time that a full secondary public road is connected to the first phase of Shastina Ranch. The Stonesfair subdivision and the remaining portion of Shastina Ranch on the west side of Clover Creek are also limited in the number of lots allowed with a single point of access on Shasta View Drive from Rancho Road. Once the bridge connection over Clover Creek is completed, the connection will allow the three subdivisions to proceed with the recording of all the remaining lots for a total of nearly 750 lots. Condition 10 of the proposed Stonecreek Subdivision clarifies that no more than 100 lots of any combination of the three subdivisions west of Clover Creek will be allowed to be recorded until the Shasta View Drive connection is completed. This will also correspond with the requirement to construct the signal at Rancho Road and Shasta View Drive because the connection will increase the traffic to a point where the signal will be required.

School Site. The City's General Plan has identified the need for a public school site (Pacheco Elementary School District). At the time the existing General Plan was being developed, it was also determined that the best location for such a site would be on the west side of Shasta View Drive in view of where the greatest number of homes would be located and due to floodplain, and power-line constraints on the east side of Shasta View Drive. The Stonesfair parcel has already dedicated its required share of 7.6 acres-of the ultimate site. The Stonecreek subdivision Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Planning Commision Staff Report (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/PlannedPacket Pg. 324 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Report to Redding Planning Commission October 18, 2019
Re: 4(b)3--Public Hearing, Stonecreek Subdivision and Planned Development Page 5 will add approximately 6.1 acres for the school site for a total of a 13.7 acre school site. The City's Community Services Director and Pacheco Elementary Union School District Superintendent are in support of the location and the size of the site. Of the 6.1 acres allotted parkland must be dedicated to the City in accordance with its Subdivision Ordinance. This may be used for the school site through a joint use agreement with the City and the school district.

The land will be reserved for purchase by the Pacheco School District in accordance with provisions of the Subdivision Ordinance and the State Subdivision Map Act. The school district is anxious to develop the site and if the Stonecreek subdivision is approved, a property line adjustment to dedicate the land to the school may occur in the near future. This would allow the school to begin the process to build a new elementary school on the site. A joint use agreement is a common practice between the City and local school districts and gives the City access to large sports fields and gymnasiums to support its recreation programs. The City, in turn, assists the District with the capital development of the facilities.

Tree Preservation and Open Space. A tree survey was completed on the site and it identified a few large candidate oak trees that qualify for preservation. Many of the candidate trees are located in the open space preserve areas, and will be preserved along with the adjacent wetland.

The preserved area around the proposed lots is adjacent to the Clover Creek floodplain and open space area. This larger corridor will provide a viable habitat for the oak trees, vegetation and the animals that utilize these natural features. A few candidate trees were damaged due to the recent snow storm and were required to be removed and a few others are located within areas proposed for lots and roads and were not able to be preserved. One large candidate tree was proposed to be removed but due to the excellent quality and size of the tree, staff requested that the area be redesigned to accommodate the tree and incorporate the tree into the design of the roads and lots.

The engineer was able to shift the road and the lots to accommodate this particular candidate tree. The tree will be located in an area that will be an access area at the end of a cul-de-sac from Shasta View Drive into the neighborhood. The tree will be located in relatively close proximity to a future residence, but the forester who conducted the tree survey determined that the health of the tree should allow it to remain. Major land disturbance around the tree will be fully unavoidable but standard protection measures will apply to the tree in order to best preserve the health of the tree. If during development the tree does not fare well, a re-evaluation of the tree may be necessary prior to construction of the nearby residence.

Environmental Determination
The City of Redding conducted an initial study and mitigated negative declaration (attached), which determined that the proposed project would not have significant environmental effects.

The project, as revised and conditioned, avoids or mitigates the potentially significant environmental effects identified. The project includes measures to mitigate potentially significant impacts of air quality, biological impacts and traffic impacts. Summary of the mitigations are below:
 The applicant is subject to a variety of air quality measures to avoid dust during construction.
 To avoid impacts to migratory birds and raptors the mitigation requires avoidance and minimization measures for migratory birds and raptors.  Intersection of Hartmeyer Lane and Churn Creek Road will require a fair share payment of the future intersection improvements
Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Planning Commision Staff Report (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/PlannedPacket Pg. 325 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Report to Redding Planning Commission October 18, 2019
Re: 4(b)3--Public Hearing, Stonecreek Subdivision and Planned Development Page 6  Intersection of Shasta View and Rancho Road will require of a signal when the connection is made on Shasta View Drive south through to Airport Road.  Shasta View Drive Extension Secondary Connection, the applicant shall not record any final maps that exceed 100 lots without the secondary access constructed that will extend Shasta View drive east of Clover Creek through to Airport Road.

Public Comment
To date, staff has spoken with one neighbor to the west of the project site regarding fencing, but otherwise no letters or other comments have been received.

Project Conditions The conditions for this project are attached.

Required Findings
There are three categories of findings that apply to the project: (1) environmental/CEQA findings; (2) subdivision map findings; and (3) planned development plan findings. All required findings must be found to be in evidence to support approval of the proposed project. These are outlined and provided as an attachment to this report.

Planning Commission Authority
The Planning Commission has the authority to approve tentative subdivision maps under Section

17.120.100 of the City’s Subdivision Ordinance and planned development plans under Section

18.53.050 the City’s Zoning Ordinance. In this case, however, the City Council has the responsibility for approval of the rezoning application that the tentative subdivision map and planned development plan are dependent upon. The Planning Commission, therefore, is asked to make a recommendation on the project to the City Council.

Alternatives
The following alternatives are offered for consideration:

1. Based upon a determination that the necessary findings are in evidence, recommend that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project and approve Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-2019-00280, Planned Development Plan Application PD-2019-00309, and Rezoning Application RZ-2019-00314, subject to the draft conditions of approval. (Staff Recommendation)

2. Recommend the project for approval with modifications to the draft conditions that the Planning Commission deems necessary to support the project. Minor modifications may be incorporated into a motion for approval.

3. Recommend denial to the City Council of the tentative map, planned development plan, and rezoning applications. Such action must be based upon a finding that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan or other City development standards or poses a threat to public health, safety, or welfare. Staff has not identified any justification for denial of the project.

Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Planning Commision Staff Report (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/PlannedPacket Pg. 326 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Report to Redding Planning Commission October 18, 2019
Re: 4(b)3--Public Hearing, Stonecreek Subdivision and Planned Development Page 7 Conclusion
It is the opinion of staff that with application of the attached conditions of approval, all necessary findings for approval related to CEQA compliance, the tentative map, and the planned development plan are in evidence. The proposed rezoning to include the "PD" overlay district is appropriate to facilitate the project. The project also advances General Plan Community Development and Design Element Goal 11 and Policy 11D, to ensure new residential developments are well-located and well designed with a mix of residential density and dwelling types and CDD Goal 12 and Policy 12A to ensure attractive, safe, and well-maintained neighborhoods by promoting neighborhood quality though project amenities and establishment of a homeowners' association.

Attachments
Findings
Draft Conditions of Approval/Standard Conditions
Aerial Location Map
Zoning Map
Draft Ordinance
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study
Tentative Map
Tree Plan
Planned Development Plan
Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Planning Commision Staff Report (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/PlannedPacket Pg. 327 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 413
Attachment: Location Map (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning) Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) ORDINANCE NO. _____

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING ADOPTING AN

AMENDMENT TO THE CITY OF REDDING ZONING MAP RELATING
TO THE REZONING OF THE STONECREEK SUBDIVISION (APN# 054- 510-029-000 AND 054-510-082-000) CONSISTING OF 61.6 ACRES

LOCATED ALONG BOTH SIDES OF SHASTA VIEW DRIVE SOUTH OF
RANCHO ROAD IN THE CITY OF REDDING (RZ-2019-00314)
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Finding of fact: the City finds and declares as follows:

A. The Zoning Map of the City of Redding is incorporated in and made part of the Redding Municipal Code Title 18, known as the City of Redding Zoning Ordinance.

B. The Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pertaining to the amendment on October 22, 2019, and unanimously recommended that the City Council adopt the attached amendment to the Zoning Map.

C. The City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on November 19, 2019, prior to the first reading of this Ordinance.

D. The proposed amendment to the Zoning Map is consistent with the General Plan and any applicable specific plans.

E. Adoption of this ordinance will not impact the welfare of the citizens of Redding and its surrounding region.

Section 2. On the basis of the initial study for Rezoning Application RZ-2019-00314 prepared by the Development Services Department, the City Council finds that the subject rezoning will not have a significant effect on the environment and approves the Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following findings:

1. The City of Redding has completed a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the rezoning.

Based on the analysis of the potential impacts associated with the rezoning, the project will not have a significant effect on the environment.

2. The Mitigated Negative Declaration and its supporting documentation reflect the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding.

Section 3. The boundaries of the districts referred to in Section 18.01.050 of the Redding Municipal Code, as designated on a map entitled “Zoning Map of the City of Redding, California” dated January 7, 2003, are hereby altered as set forth on the map attached hereto and made a part hereof by:

Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Ordinance (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) REZONING: 61.6 acres on Shasta View Drive
FROM: “RS-3” Residential Single Family District
TO: “RS-3-PD” Residential Single Family District with a Planned Development Overlay
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption; and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and cause its publication according to law.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that this ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 19th day of November, 2019; and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the on the __ day of _________________, 2019, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

JULIE WINTER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
_
PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Ordinance (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) RS-2
RS-3 OS
RS-3-PD
SC
RS-2
RS-3
RS-3
RS-2
RS-2
RS-3
RS-2
RE-1
PF

RANCHO RD

STONE DR

BO PEEP LN

RANCHO VISTA WAY

HOTLAM RD

PALO VERDE LN

ST CHARLES DR SARATOGA DR

MUIR PEAK RD

SHEENA LN

BIG HORN DR

PHIL CT

LANCE LN KARUK AVE

HENRY'S FORK DR

SMITH RIVER DR

COPPER CREEK DR

CLARA CT

RUSH CREEK CT

GREEN RIFFLE RD

PERSISTENCE LN

RISING RIVER CT

THUMB ROCK RD

SHASTA VIEW DR

SARATOGA DR

SHASTA VIEW DR
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

GIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400Feet

ZONING MAP
P:\Planning\MapDocuments\Commission Maps\S\S-2019-00280.aprx S-2019-00280 / PD-2019-00309 / RZ-2019-00314

STONECREEK AT SHASTINA RANCH

STONESFAIR SHASTA INVESTORS LP
AP# 054-510-029 & -032
OCTOBER 17, 2019
2873 RANCHO RD

S&J DEVELOPMENT INC
2923 RANCHO RD

S&J DEVELOPMENT INC
Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Zoning Map (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 417
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 418
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 333
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 419
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 420
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 335
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 421
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 336
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 422
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 337
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 423
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 338
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 424
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 339
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 425
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 340
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 426
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 341
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 427
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 342
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 428
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 343
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 429
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 344
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 430
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 345
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 431
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 346
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 432
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 347
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 433
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 348
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 434
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 349
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 435
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 350
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 436
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 351
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 437
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 352
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 438
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 353
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 439
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 354
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 440
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 355
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 441
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 356
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 442
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 357
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 443
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 358
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 444
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 359
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 445
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 360
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 446
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 361
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 447
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 362
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 448
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 363
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 449
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 364
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 450
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 365
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 451
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 366
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 452
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 367
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Packet Pg. 453
Attachment: Mitigated Negative Declaration and Initial Study (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Packet Pg. 368
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Stonecreek
at Shastina Ranch
Planned Development
October 2019
Shasta View Drive
Airport Road
Rancho Road
Shasta View Drive
Job No. 18.0148
Prepared by:

A collaboration by:

JEB ALLEN & SUE TSAI LAND & TIMBER
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Planned Development Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Stonecreek
at Shastina Ranch
Prepared by: A collaboration by:

LAND & TIMBER
Job No. 18.0148
Table of Contents
Builder Vision ...........................................................................................................

Master Plan ...............................................................................................................

Site Plan .....................................................................................................................

Amenities ..................................................................................................................

Architecture - Attached Single-Family Lots (Pedestrian Court Alternative) ..

Architecture - Attached Single-Family Lots (Motor Court Alternative) .........

Architecture - 50+ wide Traditional Lots ............................................................. 1 2
3 4
5 6
7 Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Planned Development Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Stonecreek
at Shastina Ranch
Prepared by: A collaboration by:

LAND & TIMBER
Job No. 18.0148
1 Builder Vision
Stonecreek at Shastina Ranch is the culmination of years of planning, negotiations, and land acquisitions by Sue Tsai and Jeb Allen of Palomar Builders and Sierra Pacific Land & Timber. The 61.6 acre project located in southeast Redding integrates seamlessly with the Stonesfair subdivision and the original Shastina Ranch planned development resulting in the largest master planned community in Redding.

Stonecreek at Shastina Ranch will offer 218 homes designed to meet the local demand for diverse housing options. These include:

Attached single-family homes on motor courts and traditionally oriented single-family lots in a range of sizes to accommodate a variety of home sizes and configurations. All of these homes are arranged in unique neighborhoods that protect the valuable natural resources on the property.

All on-site wetlands and Waters of the U.S. have been protected within 14.2 acres of open space. In addition, the project offers 6.1 acres of land for a future school and 5.2 acres of land will be dedicated for the extension of Shasta View Drive through the property (per the City of Redding’s General Plan circulation diagram). Additional project amenities include a roundabout within Shasta View Drive at the school site and trail connections to: the Clover Creek corridor; Shasta View Drive; the school site; and the Shastina Ranch park.

Stonecreek at Shastina Ranch
Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Planned Development Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Stonecreek
at Shastina Ranch
Prepared by: A collaboration by:

LAND & TIMBER
Job No. 18.0148
2 Stonecreek at Shastina Ranch:

Large lots (70’ min. width)3
Medium lots (60’ min. width) 64
Small lots (50’ min. width) 28
Attached Single Family lots 108
Future Lots 15
Total 218
Stonesfair
Large lots (70’ min. width) 116
Total 116
Shastina Ranch
Medium lots (not built) 149
Large lots (not built) 141
Medium and large lots (built) 119
Total 409
Master Plan Total 728
Master Plan
Stonecreek
at Shastina Ranch
Stonesfair
Shastina Ranch
Community Park
Trail
Legend:

Rancho Road
Not to Scale
Future
School
Site
Shasta View Drive
Clover Creek Corridor
Airport Road
Shasta View Dr.

Wetland
Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Planned Development Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Stonecreek
at Shastina Ranch
Prepared by: A collaboration by:

LAND & TIMBER
Job No. 18.0148
3 Site Plan
3 2 1
4 5
6 7
8 9
10 11 12
13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22 23
24 25
26 27
28 29
30 31
32 33 34
35 36
104 96 37
155 163
175 167
187 195 203
119 127 135 143 144
111 103
148 156
176 168
180 188 196
112 120 128 136
106 98
153 161
173 165
185 193 201
117 125 133 141 146
109 101
150 158
178 170
182 190 198
114 122 130 138
405 97
154 162
174 166
186 194 202
118 126 134 142 145
110 102
149 157
177 169
181 189 197
113 121 129 137
107 99
152 160
172 164
184 192 200
116 124 132 140 147
108 100
151 159
179 171
183 191 199
115 123 131 139
38 39
40 41
42 43
44 45
46 47
48 49
50 51
52 53
54 55
56 57
58 59
60 61
62 63
64 65
66 67
68 71
70 69
72 73 74 75 76 77
78 79
80 81
82 83
84 87 86 85
88 95 94 93 92 91 90 89
Site Data:

APN: 054-510-032
054-510-029
Part of 054-510-030
Existing Use: Vacant
General Plan: Res. 2-3.5
Existing Zoning: RS-3
Proposed Zoning: RS-3 with PD Overlay
Proposed Use: Residential Subdivision
Site Area: 61.6 acres
Total Project Units: 218
Project Density: 3.5 D.U./acre
Electricity: Redding Electric Utility
Open Space: 14.2 acres
Future School Site: 6.1 acres
Large lots (70’ wide) 3
Medium lots (60’ wide) 64
Small lots (50’ wide) 28
Future lots 15
Attached single-family lots 108
Wetland
Total: 218
1” = 200’
Legend:

Rancho Road
Shasta View Drive
Future
Open Space School Site
Detention
Open Space
Street ‘H’
Street ‘O’
Road ‘C’
Street ‘B’
Street ‘E’
Road ‘J’
Street ‘I’
Street ‘B’
Street ‘F’
Road ‘D’
S
treet ‘G’
S
treet ‘H’
Roundabout and street improvement details may vary from illustration.

Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Planned Development Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Stonecreek
at Shastina Ranch
Prepared by: A collaboration by:

LAND & TIMBER
Job No. 18.0148
4 Amenities
Pedestrian connections
to Shasta View Drive
Open space
Attached single-family
motor courts
(see pages 5 & 6)
Extension of Shasta View
Drive south of Rancho Road
(see Shasta View Drive
section to right)
Clover Creek corridor connections
Clover Creek corridor
Shastina Ranch park
Open space
Future
School
Site
Roundabout provides
traffic calming and speed
attenuation
Connectivity via Shasta View
Drive and trails to the nearby
Clover Creek corridor and
Shastina Ranch Park (see
page 2 for overall diagram
N.T.S. with park and trail corridor)
12’

4.5’-8.5’ 10’ 4’-8’ 4’-8’ 10’ 4.5’-8.5’
Landscaped Corridor Median Landscaped Corridor
Meandering
Walk
Meandering
Walk
96’ Right-of-way

22.5’ 19.5’ 19.5’ 22.5’

SHASTA VIEW DRIVE STREET SECTION
Stonecreek
at Shastina Ranch
Roundabout and street improvement details may vary from illustrations.

Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Planned Development Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Stonecreek
at Shastina Ranch
Prepared by: A collaboration by:

LAND & TIMBER
Job No. 18.0148
5 Architecture
Attached Single-Family Lots
Pedestrian Court Alternative
Attached Single-Family
Units 96 - 203
Images are conceptual and final designs may vary. Images not to scale. 5’
10’
10’
15’
26’
20’

STREET VIEW

MOTOR COURT PEDESTRIAN COURT
Attached Single-Family Data:

Buildings: 54
Units: 108
Features: 2-story units, 2-car garages, 1 additional
off-street space per unit, motor court

TYPICAL POD LAYOUT
Note: All dimensions are minimums
Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Planned Development Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Stonecreek
at Shastina Ranch
Prepared by: A collaboration by:

LAND & TIMBER
Job No. 18.0148
6 Architecture
Attached Single-Family Data:

Buildings: 54
Units: 108
Features: 2-story units, 2-car garages, 1 additional
off-street space per unit, motor court
Attached Single-Family
Units 96 - 203
Images are conceptual and final designs may vary. Images not to scale.

ALTERNATIVE POD LAYOUT
Note: All dimensions are minimums
5’
10’
10’
15’
26’ Private Yard
(Typ.)
20’

STREET VIEW

MOTOR COURT
Attached Single-Family Lots
Motor Court Alternative
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Planned Development Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Stonecreek
at Shastina Ranch
Prepared by: A collaboration by:

LAND & TIMBER
Job No. 18.0148
7 Architecture
50’+ wide Traditional Lots
Images are conceptual and final design may vary. Images not to scale. 5’ side yard
(12’ for corner side yard)
20’ garade setback
15’ building setback
10’ building
separation
10’ rear yard

TYPICAL PLOT PLAN
Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Planned Development Plan (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Civil Engineering • Land Planning • Surveying & Mapping Landscape Architecture • Presentation Graphics 6590 Lockheed Drive, Redding, CA 96002 530.221.1792 voice • 530.221.8369 fax • [email protected] SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC.

Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Tentative Map Set (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Civil Engineering • Land Planning • Surveying & Mapping Landscape Architecture • Presentation Graphics 6590 Lockheed Drive, Redding, CA 96002 530.221.1792 voice • 530.221.8369 fax • [email protected] SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC.

Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Tentative Map Set (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2) Civil Engineering • Land Planning • Surveying & Mapping Landscape Architecture • Presentation Graphics 6590 Lockheed Drive, Redding, CA 96002 530.221.1792 voice • 530.221.8369 fax • [email protected] SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER, INC.

Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Tentative Map Set (available online) (6.2--Public Hearing Re: Stonecreek Subdivision/Planned Development/Rezoning)Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 11-19-19 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Silverstone Subdivision - Unit 2)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following action relative to the Shastina Ranch Subdivision - Unit 5 (S-7-03/PD-5- 04):
(1) Accept the improvements in Shastina Ranch–Unit 5 as satisfactorily complete; (2) Adopt Resolution accepting streets for maintenance and operation; and (3) Instruct the City Clerk to return the related securities to the developer following completion of the warranty period or as directed by the City Engineer upon completion of all obligations.

Fiscal Impact
There will be cumulative impacts to the Public Works Department due to the increase in public street infrastructure requiring annual maintenance, especially the asphalt pavement. The project will generate an incremental increase in state gas-tax funds based on population and point-oforigin sales; however, the increase in these revenues falls short of the anticipated annualized maintenance cost.

In addition, there will be an incremental increase in the City of Redding (City) utility costs due to the additional infrastructure. Generally, except for the storm-drain utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any increase in annual maintenance costs. The stormdrain utility is pressed with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to not accept the improvements. Under this alternative, the City would be inconsistent with a long-standing policy of maintaining streets and infrastructure following the completion of the improvements in accordance with City standards.

MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(f)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5 Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 381
Report to Redding City Council December 13, 2022
Re: 4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5 Page 2 Background/Analysis
The developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Co., has satisfactorily completed the installation of all improvements in Shastina Ranch Subdivision - Unit 5 (S-7-03/PD-5-04). The subdivision is located south of Rancho Road and Shasta View Drive. A map showing the location of the subdivision is attached.

The Shastina Ranch Subdivision - Unit 5 (S-7-03/PD-5-04) was approved by the Council on July 5, 2005, and all conditions of the map have been fulfilled. The final map for the subdivision was approved by the Council on October 18, 2022. All improvements have been satisfactorily completed, and all required fees have been paid. This subdivision was also required to form a landscape maintenance district, which has been formed.

The developer has completed all the conditioned improvements for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision - Unit 5 (S-7-03/PD-05-04). It is prudent to accept the improvements and adopt a resolution accepting streets for maintenance and operation. The developer has requested the City retain the existing performance security through the warranty period.

The Resolution has been approved to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required.

An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, and on April 5, 2005, the Council adopted a resolution (2005-048) certifying the completeness and adequacy of the Final EIR (FEIR-1-03).

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution - Streets and Maintenance
^Shastina Ranch 5 Site Loc Map
Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map
Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05
Reso 2005-048 - Shastina Ranch Subdivision
Packet Pg. 382
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

ACCEPTING FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF THE
STREETS IN SHASTINA RANCH SUBDIVISION, UNIT 5, (S-7-03/PD-5- 04)
WHEREAS, improvements have been satisfactorily completed in Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5, (S-7-03/PD-5-04); and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the streets in Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5, (S-7-03/PD-5-04), be accepted into the City street system for maintenance and operation by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the City Council, pursuant to the authority provided in Section 1806 of the California Streets and Highways Code, that the streets in Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5 (S-7-03/PD-5-04), as shown on the map attached hereto and incorporated by reference, are accepted into the City street system for maintenance and operation by the City.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 20th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: ^Resolution - Streets and Maintenance (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: ^Shastina Ranch 5 Site Loc Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Silverstone Subdivision, Unit 2, (AMND-2020- 01135, S-2019-00280) and Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5 (S-7-03/PD-5-04):
(1) Approve the final maps and authorize the Mayor to execute a Subdivision Agreement with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company; and direct the City Clerk to file the maps with the Shasta County Recorder;
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 63rd Amendment to the City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $160,730 from Park In-Lieu/Southeast Quadrant to purchase 3.56 acres of land; and
(3) Authorize payment of $160,730 to the Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company (Developer) for 3.56 acres of land, described as Parcel A of the Silverstone Unit 2 final map, upon recordation of the final subdivision map.

Fiscal Impact
Approval of the final map for Silverstone, Unit 2, and Shastina Ranch, Unit 5, will have a cumulative impact to the Public Works Department due to the increase in public-street infrastructure requiring annual maintenance, especially the asphalt pavement. The project will generate an incremental increase in state gas-tax funds based on population and point-of-origin sales; however, the increase in these revenues falls short of the anticipated annualized maintenance cost.

In addition, there will be an incremental increase in the City of Redding (City) utilities costs due to the additional infrastructure. Generally, except for the Storm Drain Utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any increase in annual maintenance costs. The Storm Drain Utility is challenged with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover.

MEETING DATE: October 18, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(g)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(g)--Approve Final Maps and Execute Subdivision Agreements for Silverstone Subdivision, Unit 2 (AMND-2020-01135, S-2019-00280) and Shastina Ranch, Unit 5 (S-7-03/PD-5-04); and Adopt Budget Resolution Appropriating Funds Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Report to Redding City Council October 11, 2022
Re: 4.11(g)--Final Map-Silverstone Unit 2; Shastina Ranch Unit 5 & Budget Resolution Page 2

The recommended budget resolution allocates $160,730 of Park In-Lieu funds (Southeast Quadrant), leaving a remaining fund balance of $472,576 (Southeast Quadrant) and $1,846,201 respectively in the overall Park In-Lieu fund. There will be no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to approve staff recommendations which will require a finding that the subdivision is not being developed in accordance with the conditions of the approved tentative map or in conformance with the State Subdivision Map Act. In addition, it would not allow the transfer and purchase of 3.56 acres of property to the existing subdivision parkland. The Council could then provide staff alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
Silverstone Subdivision, Unit 2
The Silverstone Subdivision, Unit 2 (AMND-2020-01135, S-2019-00280), was approved by the Planning Commission on September 22, 2020. Attached is a map showing the subdivision, which is located south of Rancho Road and Shasta View Drive.

The developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, has submitted the final map and all other required data, which has been checked and approved by various City departments.

Relevant subdivision map conditions of approval have been met with the exception of some portions of the roadway conditions (arterial wall, pouring curb/gutter/sidewalk, centerline monument survey, street name signs, utility manhole, street lights and valve grade adjustments).

The developer has agreed to the execution of a subdivision agreement, has committed to completing these conditions, and has submitted a related security in the amount of $391,758 for the remaining work. The developer has been informed that no occupancy permits will be granted for residences constructed on lots until all related subdivision agreement conditions have been met.

Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5
The Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 2 (S-7-03/PD-5-04), was approved by the Planning Commission on July 16, 2005. Attached is a map showing the subdivision, which is located south of Rancho Road and Shasta View Drive.

The developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, has submitted the final map and all other required data, which has been checked and approved by various City departments.

Relevant subdivision map conditions of approval have been met with the exception of some portions of the roadway conditions (arterial wall, pouring curb/gutter/sidewalk, centerline monument survey, street name signs, utility manhole, street lights and valve grade adjustments).

The developer has agreed to the execution of a subdivision agreement, has committed to completing these conditions, and has submitted a related security in the amount of $430,191 for the remaining work. The developer has been informed that no occupancy permits will be granted for residences constructed on lots until all related subdivision agreement conditions have been met.

Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Report to Redding City Council October 11, 2022
Re: 4.11(g)--Final Map-Silverstone Unit 2; Shastina Ranch Unit 5 & Budget Resolution Page 3

Park Resolution
The Shastina Ranch Master Plan includes land dedications and land reservations to form a park facility at the location identified as Parcel A on the Silverstone Unit 2 final map. The park land includes 7.88 acres of land, of which 4.32 is land dedication. This was dedicated per the California Quimby Act, Subdivision Map Act (SMA) Section 66477, that allows a City to require dedication of land at 510 square feet per lot. Acreage in excess of that amount must be reserved through the entitlement process and purchased following the map recordation. As such,

3.56 acres of land will be purchased from the developer at $160,730 following the final map recordation. The valuation of the property is also outlined in the Quimby Act. The City Attorney has reviewed this arrangement.

Environmental Review
On June 15, 2005, the Council held a public hearing and adopted a resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S-7-03) and Planned Development Application (PD-5- 04) for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project after adopting a resolution certifying the completeness and adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report, EIR-1-03, on April 15, 2005.

On March 11, 2008, after a public hearing was held, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S-9- 05) Stonesfair Subdivision.

Condition 61 of the Stonesfair Subdivision Map and Condition 45a of the Silverstone (formerly Stonescreek) Subdivision Map (S-2019-0280) require the developer to make an irrevocable offer of dedication (minimum 7.55 acres) to the City in fee simple absolute. The Stonescreek Subdivision Application was approved and a mitigated negative declaration was adopted after a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on October 22, 2019. No further action is required at this time.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
x This agenda item is a routine operational item.
c: Ryan Masterson, Fire Marshal
Ken Iwamura, Public Works Department
Kyle Jones, Public Works Department
Kim Niemer, Community Services Department
Joseph Forseth-Deshais, Parks Division
Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map Silverstone Unit 2
^Location Map Shastina Ranch Unit 5
^Final Map Silverstone Unit 2
^Final Map Shastina Ranch Unit 5
Subdivision Agreement Silverstone Unit 2
Silverstone Unit 2 Letter of Credit
Subdivision Agreement Shastina Ranch Unit 5
Shastina Ranch Unit 5 Letter of Credit
Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 63rd AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021-078 APPROPRIATING $160,730 FOR THE PURCHASE OF 3.56 ACRES OF PARK

LAND RELATED TO SILVERSTONE FINAL SUBDIVISION MAP
REQUIREMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
128 618 Parks In-Lieu $160,730
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Revenue
128-618-1-0001-01 Parks In-Lieu Division Balance $ 160,730 Increase Expenditures
128-618-4747-03 Shastina Ranch Park Land 160,730 $
Total $ 160,730 160,730 $
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $160,730 for the purchase 3.56 acres park land related to Silverstone Final subdivision map requirements for fiscal year 2022-23.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 18th day of October, 2022, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Silverstone U2 Security Calcs Page 1
Estimated Amount of Final Map Security
FOR
Silverstone, Unit 2

ENGINEERING DIVISION
P.O. Box 496071
REDDING, CA 96049-6071
(530) 225-4170
Date: 9/19/2022
Original Construction Estimate: Did not receive
Performance Security: Remaining work (provided by engineer) $ 231,125 (work remaining to be completed) 10% CONTINGENCY $ 23,113

3.0% INFLATION $ 6,934
Performance Security $ 261,171
Payment Security: Payment Security $ 130,586
(50% of Perf. Security)
TOTAL SECURITY 391,757 $
Calc'd By: Kyle A. Jones
Construction Manager
(530) 225-4181
[email protected]
EXHIBIT "A"
Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Shastina Ranch U5 Security Calcs Page 1
Estimated Amount of Final Map Security
FOR
Shastina Ranch, Unit 5

ENGINEERING DIVISION
P.O. Box 496071
REDDING, CA 96049-6071
(530) 225-4170
Date: 9/19/2022
Original Construction Estimate: 2,324,400 $
Performance Security: Remaining work (provided by engineer) $ 253,800 (work remaining to be completed) 10% CONTINGENCY $ 25,380

3.0% INFLATION $ 7,614
Performance Security $ 286,794
Payment Security: Payment Security $ 143,397
(50% of Perf. Security)
TOTAL SECURITY 430,191 $
Calc'd By: Kyle A. Jones
Construction Manager
(530) 225-4181
[email protected]
EXHIBIT "A"
Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 10-18-22 - Final Map (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 434
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 435
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 436
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 437
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 438
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 439
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 440
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 441
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 442
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 443
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 444
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 445
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 446
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 447
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 448
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 449
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 450
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 451
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 452
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 453
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 454
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 455
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 456
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 457
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 458
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 459
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 460
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 461
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 462
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 463
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 464
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 465
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 466
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 467
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 468
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 469
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 470
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 471
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 472
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 473
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 474
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 475
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 476
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 477
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 478
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 479
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 480
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 481
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 482
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 483
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 484
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 485
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 486
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 487
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 488
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 489
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 490
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 491
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 492
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 493
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 494
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 495
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 496
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 497
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 498
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 499
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 500
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 501
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 502
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 503
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 504
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 505
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 506
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 507
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 508
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 509
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 510
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 511
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 512
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 513
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 514
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 515
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 516
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 517
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 518
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 519
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 520
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 521
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 522
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 523
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 524
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 525
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 526
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 527
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 528
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 529
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 530
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 531
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 532
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 533
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 534
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 535
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 536
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 537
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 538
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) Packet Pg. 539
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - 07-05-05 (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) e e
RESOLUTION NO. 2005- 48

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

CERTIFYING THE COMPLETENESS AND ADEQUACY
OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EIR-I-03

FOR THE SHASTINA RANCH SUBDIVISION PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Redding, as lead agency for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project Project), has conducted the following environmental review for the proposed Project:

1. A Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report ( DEIR) was circulated for review and comment on March 23, 2004; and

2. A Notice of Completion of a DEIR was circulated for review and comment on August 26, 2004; and

3. A public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission on the DEIR on September 28, 2004. Notice of that hearing included a letter notice to all property owners between 600 and 2, 200 feet from the project boundary and publication in the Record Searchlight; and

4. After closure of the public comment period, all comments received were summarized and addressed in writing. Responses specific to local and State agencies were mailed directly to those agencies on January 17, 2005; and

5. Written comments on the DEIR by State and local agencies and individuals and responses to comments were included in the Final Environmental Impact Report ( FEIR); and

6. A public hearing was conducted by the Planning Commission on the FEIR on February 8, 2005. Notice ofthat hearing included a letter to all public agencies and persons that submitted comments on the DEIR and to all property owners between 600 and 2,200 feet from the project boundary and publication in the Record Searchlight; and

7. The Planning Commission, at the conclusion of its February 8, 2005, hearing, adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2005- 01, recommending that the City Council certify FEIR- I- 03 and adopt the Mitigation Monitoring Program; and J

8. A public hearing was conducted by the City Council on FEIR- I- 03 on March 15, 2005. Notice of that hearing included a letter to all public agencies and persons that submitted comments on the DEIR and to all property owners between 600 and 2, 200 feet from the project boundary and publication in the Record Searchlight; and

9. Before final action can b(~ taken by the City Council on the Project, the Project must be submitted to the Shasta County Airport Land Use Commission for a determination of C/'> consistency and/or an amendment to the Redding Municipal Airport Comprehensive Land Use Sf Plan; and ~
to. The Shasta County Airport Land Use Commission may require a certified environmental document in order to support certain actions.

Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: Reso 2005-048 - Shastina Ranch Subdivision (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5) e e
NOW, THEREFORE, BE; IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding, based upon the entire record ofthe environmental review for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project, makes the following findings:

1. The FEIR has been completed in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act; and

2. The FEIR was presented to the City Council and the City Council has reviewed and considered the information contained in the FEIR; and

3. The FEIR reflects the City' s
independent judgment and analysis.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding, based upon substantial evidence in the administrative record and FEIR- 1- 03, hereby certifies the attached FEIR- 1- 03 as complete and in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council ofthe City of Redding at a regular meeting
on this 5th day of April 2005, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Council Members:

Council Members:

Council Members:

Council Members:

Dickerson, Murray, Pohlmeyer, Stegall, and Mathena
None
None
None
I....

I
Attest: . Form Approved:
7~~"':7__/- ~/
RICHARD A. DUVERNAY, City Attorney
Revised: March 14, 2005
Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: Reso 2005-048 - Shastina Ranch Subdivision (4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 5)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5330 for furnishing liquid chlorine, sulfur dioxide, sodium bisulfite, and sodium hypochlorite:
(1) Award to Thatcher Company of California, Inc., and Jones Chemical, Inc., for a total annual evaluated cost of $609,275 (not including tax and freight); (2) Authorize the Purchasing Officer to approve the annual contract amendments through December 31, 2027; and
(3) Authorize the Purchasing Officer to approve price increases per manufacture price increases, inflation, and other market factors.

Fiscal Impact
Sufficient funds for liquid chlorine, sulfur dioxide, sodium bisulfite, and sodium hypochlorite are available in the respective Water and Wastewater Utility budgets.

Alternative Action
The City Council may choose to not award the bid. Without liquid chlorine, sulfur dioxide, sodium bisulfite, and sodium hypochlorite, the treatment plants would not be able to operate or meet the State Water Resources Control Board’s regulatory requirements.

Background/Analysis
Attached is a tabulation of bids received and opened on November 21, 2022. Eight bid opportunity notices were distributed to potential vendors, in addition to advertising this bid opportunity in the local newspaper and posting the full document on the City of Redding’s website. Three bids were received. Thatcher Company of California, Inc., and Jones Chemical, Inc., are able to supply the chemicals needed for water and wastewater treatment purposes; however, neither carry all chemicals requested in total. Two contracts must be awarded to MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(g)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(g)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5330, Furnish Liquid Chlorine, Sulfur Dioxide, Sodium Bisulfite and Sodium Hypochlorite.

Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 542
Report to Redding City Council December 13, 2022
Re: 4.11(g)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5330, Chlorine, Sulfur Dioxide, ect. Page 2 provide all required chemicals for the purposes of water treatment needs. Staff also recommends allowing the flexibility to purchase various chemicals from each of the suppliers depending on market availability or delays in product delivery.

The bids are based on a unit price, and the quantities vary from year to year depending on the plants’ needs. The pricing may change quarterly per the deviation noted on the bid submittal.

The initial contracts will be from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. The contracts may be extended annually through December 31, 2027, by the Purchasing Officer. The total annual evaluated cost does not include sales tax or freight charges.

The Clear Creek and Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plants and the Foothill and Buckeye Water Treatment Plants all use chlorine for water disinfection treatment purposes. In addition, the wastewater treatment plants use sulfur dioxide to remove the chlorine from the water/effluent prior to discharge into the Sacramento River. Recently, sulfur dioxide has become less available and there are limited distributors of the chemical. Staff is currently installing provisions to replace the sulfur dioxide system with a liquid sodium bisulfite dosing system for the dechlorination process. The chemicals are delivered on a weekly basis to meet the stringent State Water Resources Control Board regulatory requirements of the respective plants.

Environmental Review
This activity is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Bid Tab
Packet Pg. 543

CITY OF REDDING

PURCHASING DIVISION - TABULATION OF BIDS
BID:

DATE OF OPENING
5330 MONDAY, November 21, 2022
Josh Vandiver TIME OF OPENING
Chuck Aukland 3:00 P.M.

QTY
1 thru 4
5 +
1 thru 3
4+
1 thru 4
5 +
263 gal tote
233 gal tote
$4.95gal / $1648 333 gal tote
price only for totes
included
N/A
Bisulfite, and Sodium Hypochlorite
N/A only tote price
included
N/A since they are 1-way Totes
$2450 tote/$1750 bulk FTL
$250.00
$250.00
$893.75
$1.80/gal
$2450 tote/$1750 bulk FTL
Liquid Sodium Bisulfite, 38% - 275 gl Tote
*Bulk Delivery Cost
Liquid Sodium Bisulfite, 25% - 275 gl Tote
*Bulk Delivery Cost
$1,053.25
$1.95/gal
$904.75
$1.40/gal
$6.00 gal / $1578 Tote
N/A only tote price
$7.15 gal / $1665.95 Tote

LIQUID SODIUM BISULFITE
$2,499.99
$1,000.00
$405.00
$405.00
$2,450.00
$0.00 $150.00
$1,060.00
$1,060.00
market value
market value $2,450.00
150 lb Containers
Freight Cost
$0.00
$250.00
$250.00
market value

SULFUR DIOXIDE
JCI Thatcher Univar
Furnish Liquid Chlorine, Sulfur Dioxide, Sodium
SCHEDULE NO.
1 Ton Containers
Deposit Charge Per Container
Deposit Charge Per Container

LIQUID CHLORINE
1 Ton Containers
150 lb Containers
Freight Cost
$2,203.00
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
DESCRIPTION Unit Price Unit Price Unit Price
$2,203.00
Deposit Charge Per Container
1 Ton Containers
1 Ton Containers
Freight Cost
*Bulk Delivery Cost
Freight Delivery Cost
Deposit Charge Per Tote

LIQUID SODIUM HYPOCHLORITE
Liquid Sodium Hypochlorite, 12.5% - 275 gl Tote
Freight Delivery Cost
Deposit Charge Per Tote
Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(g)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5330, Chlorine, Sulfur Dioxide, ect.)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid No. 5325 for furnishing various chemicals:
(1) Award contracts to Helix Labs, Hill Brothers Chemical Company, and Univar USA, Inc., for a total annual evaluated cost of $298,043.25 through December 31, 2023, not inclusive of sales tax, mill fees, or shipping;
(2) Authorize staff to purchase various chemicals from each of the suppliers depending on market availability or delays in product delivery; and
(3) Authorize the Purchasing Officer to approve quarterly rate changes and manufacturer price increases.

Fiscal Impact
Sufficient funds for these various chemicals are available in each of the respective department budgets (Public Works, Redding Electric Utility and Community Services).

Alternative Action
The City Council may choose to not award the bids. Without these chemicals, the wastewater treatment plants, Redding Power Plant, and the Redding Aquatic Center would not be able to operate or meet the State Water Resources Control Board’s regulatory requirements.

Background/Analysis
The Purchasing Division attempted to solicit Bid No. 5325 for various chemicals on September 20, 2022. Eight bid opportunity notices were distributed to potential vendors, in addition to advertising this bid opportunity in the local newspaper and posting the full document on the City of Redding’s website. There were no responses to the advertised bid opportunity resulting in Purchasing directly negotiating with interested vendors. A total of three vendors were responsive to negotiations and bids were received from Helix Labs, Univar USA, Inc., and Hill Brothers MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(h)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(h)--Award Contracts for Various Chemical Purchases Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 545
Report to Redding City Council December 13, 2022
Re: 4.11(h)--Award Contracts for Various Chemical Purchases Page 2 Chemical Company. Each were the lowest bidders on specified chemicals per the attached bid tab. The total annual evaluated cost does not include freight charges.

The chemicals are used for various water treatment processes at the respective facilities. They are necessary to balance pH levels, chlorinate and disinfect water, and clean equipment. The Redding Aquatic Center uses these chemicals for the swimming pools, the Redding Power Plant for gas turbine exhaust and cooling tower water, and the Wastewater Plants for several water treatment processes.

Environmental Review
This activity is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Bid Tab
Packet Pg. 546

CITY OF REDDING

PURCHASING DIVISION - TABULATION OF BIDS
BID: DELIVERY OF VARIOUS CHEMICALS
BID SCHEDULE NO. DATE OF OPENING
5325 No bids recvd

TIME OF OPENING
3:00 P.M.

ITEM UNIT PRICE YEARLY UNIT PRICE YEARLY UNIT PRICE YEARLY UNIT PRICE YEARLY 1 $3.31 $7,530.252 $3.6238 $126,833.00
3 $0.8500 $3,825.004 $4.10 $9,430.005 $3.35 $50,250.006 $0.7650 $765.007 $2.90 $60,900.00 $2.90 $11,600.008 $5.98 $26,910.00 Total: $74,920.00 $46,040.25 $50,250.00 $126,833.00
$298,043.25
Redding Power Plant
Redding Aquatic Center
Sulfuric Acid, 93% Sodium Bicarbonate
Clear Creek WWTP
Aqueous Ammonia 29.4% ( Hill Bros )Calcium Chloride Caustic Soda 50%

DESCRIPTION
Sodium Hypochlorite, 12.5%
Stillwater WWTP
Total Estimated Annual Hydrochloric Acid, 15% Magnesium Hydroxide, 60% ( Helix Labs) Packet Pg. 547
Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(h)--Award Contracts for Various Chemical Purchases)

CITY OF REDDING

FURNISH & DELIVER CHEMICALS
BID SCHEDULE NO. 5325-NO BIDS RECEIVED
12/21/22 -
11/30/23
12/21/22 -
3/30/23
12/21/22 -
11/30/23
$2,275/contained ton
Freight $750/flat rate
Caustic Soda, 50% // gallon $3.6238
Calcium Chloride // pound $0.85
Hydrochloric Acid, 15% // gallon $4.10
$.265.lb/$3.31gal available by
quote
Sodium Bicarbonate // pound $0.765
Sodium Hypochlorite, 12.5% // gallon $2.90
$5.98
Univar
Hill Bros
Magnesium Hydroxide, 60% // gallon
Sulfuric Acid, 93% // gallon
Aqua Ammonia, 29.4% tech grade

DESCRIPTION
Helix Labs
Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(h)--Award Contracts for Various Chemical Purchases)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 5333 (Job No. 2608) Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement Project:
(1) Award to Mitchell Johnson Construction, Inc., in the amount of $783,954; (2) Approve an additional $126,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; and $45,000 for project development costs;
(3) Approve $130,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $15,000; and (5) Find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, per Section 15301(b) - Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact
The Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement Project (Project) is being funded by the Wastewater Utility Fund.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $45,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $913,954
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $126,000
Additional City Manager Authority $15,000
Total Project Costs $1,099,954
Project Budget $1,100,000
MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(i)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(i)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5333 (Job Order No. 2608) Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement Project
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 549
Report to Redding City Council December 13, 2022
Re: 4.11(i)--Award BS No. 5333 Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement Page 2 Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to award the bid for the Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement Project and provide staff with alternate direction. If the project is not awarded, the sewer main will have ongoing maintenance and will be in jeopardy of failing.

Background/Analysis
Attached is a tabulation of bids received and opened on November 29, 2022, for the Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement Project. The low bid in the amount of $783,954 was received from Mitchell Johnson Construction, Inc., of Redding, California. The engineer's estimate was $876,570. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $45,000. Project development costs include engineering, surveying, right-of-way, environmental, consultant services, and permit fees. There is $1,100,000 budgeted for the total project.

This project includes the replacement of approximately 2,350 linear feet of 6-inch sanitary sewer main with 8-inch and 10-inch polyvinyl chloride pipe (PVC) along Woodacre Drive, Diane Street, and Jane Street. In addition, existing manholes will be rehabilitated or replaced and existing sewer laterals will be reconnected.

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301(b) - Existing Facilities.

Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing facilities, structures, or equipment involving negligible or no expansion of use. The sewer main will be replaced within the footprint of the existing utility, and the project involves no expansion of use. The project has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Bid Tab
^Location Map
^Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 550
BID TABULATION FOR:

Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement
ENGINEER'S EST Mitchell Johnson Const Stompel-Wiebelhaus AssocEddie Axner Const 11/29/2022 UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $4,800.00 $4,800.00 $750.00 $750.00 $9,463.00 $9,463.00 2 Traffic Control LS 1 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $95,000.00 $95,000.00 $116,450.00 $116,450.00 3 Construction Area Signs EA 4 $175.00 $700.00 $525.00 $2,100.00 $525.00 $2,100.00 $525.00 $2,100.004 Project Funding Sign EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.005 Bypass Pumping LS 1 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $11,500.00 $11,500.00 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 6 Trench Sheeting and Shoring LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $38,000.00 $38,000.00 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 $8,750.00 $8,750.007 Rehabilitate Manhole (Sewer, Type 1-4') EA 3 $5,100.00 $15,300.00 $4,200.00 $12,600.00 $11,500.00 $34,500.00 $11,500.00 $34,500.00 8 Replace Manhole (Sewer, Type 1-4') EA 5 $8,000.00 $40,000.00 $9,000.00 $45,000.00 $10,100.00 $50,500.00 $8,181.00 $40,905.009 Remove Manhole EA 2 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $3,200.00 $6,400.00 $3,900.00 $7,800.00 $3,328.00 $6,656.00 10 Rodhole (Sanitary Sewer) EA 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $8,400.00 $8,400.00 $5,829.00 $5,829.0011 Sanitary Sewer Lateral (Reconnect) LF 900 $225.00 $202,500.00 $160.00 $144,000.00 $132.00 $118,800.00 $164.00 $147,600.00 12 Sanitary Sewer (8"PVC) LF 982 $185.00 $181,670.00 $182.00 $178,724.00 $125.00 $122,750.00 $174.00 $170,868.00 13 Sanitary Sewer (10"PVC) LF 1362 $200.00 $272,400.00 $190.00 $258,780.00 $190.00 $258,780.00 $195.00 $265,590.00 14 Water Main (8" DIP) LF 54 $400.00 $21,600.00 $725.00 $39,150.00 $567.00 $30,618.00 $841.00 $45,414.0015 Valve (8" RWG) EA 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $3,450.00 $3,450.00 $2,419.00 $2,419.0016 Monument (Survey) EA 1 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $4,400.00 $4,400.00 $1,250.00 $1,250.00 $2,690.00 $2,690.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $876,570.00 $783,954.00 $797,398.00 $870,434.00 Bid Schedule No.: 5333
Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the special provisions. Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(i)--Award BS No. 5333 Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement) BID TABULATION FOR:

Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement
11/29/2022

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 Water Pollution Control LS 1
2 Traffic Control LS 13 Construction Area Signs EA 4
4 Project Funding Sign EA 1
5 Bypass Pumping LS 16 Trench Sheeting and Shoring LS 17 Rehabilitate Manhole (Sewer, Type 1-4') EA 3 8 Replace Manhole (Sewer, Type 1-4') EA 5
9 Remove Manhole EA 2
10 Rodhole (Sanitary Sewer) EA 111 Sanitary Sewer Lateral (Reconnect) LF 900 12 Sanitary Sewer (8"PVC) LF 982
13 Sanitary Sewer (10"PVC) LF 1362
14 Water Main (8" DIP) LF 54
15 Valve (8" RWG) EA 116 Monument (Survey) EA 1

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS
Bid Schedule No.: 5333

UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$8,780.00 $8,780.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $3,272.19 $3,272.19 $56,082.00 $56,082.00 $59,850.00 $59,850.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $8,781.03 $8,781.03 $626.00 $2,504.00 $468.00 $1,872.00 $1,250.00 $5,000.00 $278.53 $1,114.12 $1,493.00 $1,493.00 $1,692.00 $1,692.00 $5,500.00 $5,500.00 $1,226.86 $1,226.86 $19,408.00 $19,408.00 $32,500.00 $32,500.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $42,330.42 $42,330.42$21,393.00 $21,393.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $19,591.49 $19,591.49 $9,682.00 $29,046.00 $13,950.00 $41,850.00 $13,500.00 $40,500.00 $12,586.14 $37,758.42 $12,503.00 $62,515.00 $9,702.00 $48,510.00 $13,500.00 $67,500.00 $21,582.86 $107,914.30 $5,658.00 $11,316.00 $3,825.00 $7,650.00 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 $4,650.49 $9,300.98$2,675.00 $2,675.00 $4,550.00 $4,550.00 $950.00 $950.00 $6,931.42 $6,931.42 $202.00 $181,800.00 $175.00 $157,500.00 $197.77 $177,993.00 $324.84 $292,356.00$175.00 $171,850.00 $196.00 $192,472.00 $217.77 $213,850.14 $194.40 $190,900.80$204.00 $277,848.00 $202.00 $275,124.00 $234.77 $319,756.74 $211.54 $288,117.48$447.00 $24,138.00 $494.00 $26,676.00 $1,379.00 $74,466.00 $703.03 $37,963.62 $2,311.00 $2,311.00 $6,832.00 $6,832.00 $3,737.00 $3,737.00 $2,303.57 $2,303.57 $745.00 $745.00 $18,413.00 $18,413.00 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 $1,771.43 $1,771.43 $873,904.00 $881,991.00 $977,752.88 $1,051,634.13
Cox & Cox Const SnL Group Inc Jason Abel Const Inc Allen Gill Const Inc Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the special provisions. Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(i)--Award BS No. 5333 Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement) BID TABULATION FOR:

Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement
11/29/2022

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 Water Pollution Control LS 1
2 Traffic Control LS 13 Construction Area Signs EA 4
4 Project Funding Sign EA 1
5 Bypass Pumping LS 16 Trench Sheeting and Shoring LS 17 Rehabilitate Manhole (Sewer, Type 1-4') EA 3 8 Replace Manhole (Sewer, Type 1-4') EA 5
9 Remove Manhole EA 2
10 Rodhole (Sanitary Sewer) EA 111 Sanitary Sewer Lateral (Reconnect) LF 900 12 Sanitary Sewer (8"PVC) LF 982
13 Sanitary Sewer (10"PVC) LF 1362
14 Water Main (8" DIP) LF 54
15 Valve (8" RWG) EA 116 Monument (Survey) EA 1

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS
Bid Schedule No.: 5333

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$2,941.48 $2,941.48 $6,500.00 $6,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $10,981.03 $10,981.03 $39,905.00 $39,905.00 $110,000.00 $110,000.00 $672.92 $2,691.68 $200.00 $800.00 $300.00 $1,200.00
$1,538.08 $1,538.08 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $750.00 $750.00 $15,724.86 $15,724.86 $41,975.00 $41,975.00 $85,000.00 $85,000.00 $6,408.69 $6,408.69 $46,805.00 $46,805.00 $79,000.00 $79,000.00$6,818.12 $20,454.36 $5,060.00 $15,180.00 $7,500.00 $22,500.00 $12,365.83 $61,829.15 $15,214.50 $76,072.50 $20,000.00 $100,000.00 $5,614.02 $11,228.04 $6,925.88 $13,851.76 $3,500.00 $7,000.00$2,224.32 $2,224.32 $9,234.50 $9,234.50 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $278.98 $251,082.00 $277.28 $249,552.00 $372.00 $334,800.00$247.00 $242,554.00 $269.21 $264,364.22 $447.00 $438,954.00$289.80 $394,707.60 $369.00 $502,578.00 $470.00 $640,140.00$933.14 $50,389.56 $581.18 $31,383.72 $1,280.00 $69,120.00 $4,675.61 $4,675.61 $6,831.00 $6,831.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00$4,841.23 $4,841.23 $2,300.00 $2,300.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $1,084,271.69 $1,308,832.70 $1,896,464.00
Site Work Solutions Lakmann Builders Inc Sunrise Excavating Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the special provisions. Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(i)--Award BS No. 5333 Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

EXHIBIT A

WOODACRE SEWER MAIN

REPLACEMENT PROJECT PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

LOCATION

PROJECT RIVERCREST PKWY

JANE ST

DIANE ST RAFAEL ST DEE CT

BECHELLI LN

PASATIEMPO CT

LONG DRIVE CT

EGRET WAY EGRET CT

PIKE CT CHARLENE WAY

KESTREL CT WOODACRE DR

CHINOOK DR

BECHELLI LN LOMA VISTA DR
INTERSTATE 5
Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(i)--Award BS No. 5333 Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement) Packet Pg. 555
Attachment: ^Notice of Exemption (4.11(i)--Award BS No. 5333 Woodacre Sewer Main Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept update regarding the City of Redding’s COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package projects.

Fiscal Impact
The City Council (Council) previously approved an allocation of $9 million in Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for projects that reap an energy savings benefit to the City of Redding (City). To date, the City Manager has authorized purchases and projects totaling over $3 million and a consulting services agreement for engineering and construction management support for just over $1.2 million.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to accept the project status report and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020, the Council unanimously approved the City’s Economic Response Plan. Included in the plan, is the allocation of $9 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for several projects (Projects) associated with the Local Economic Stimulus Package that equates to a savings in energy costs for the City. On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized the City Manager to execute agreements, purchase orders, and contracts associated with the program to ensure an expedited delivery schedule. The Council also directed staff to provide regular status updates on the program and ratify all City Manager awards.

As directed by the City Manager, staff has endeavored to break up most of the work into smaller contracts, with values lower than $500,000, with the idea that local contractors and vendors will compete better due to lack of mobilization costs and other local advantages. However, the City MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(j)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 556
Report to Redding City Council December 13, 2022
Re: 4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update Page 2 has limited control because these are Public Works contracts and must be awarded to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder in accordance with State of California law.

To date, staff has awarded 15 projects totaling over $3 million, including projects for lighting improvements at sport fields, the Library, Corporation Yard, City Hall, the Police Department, the Civic Auditorium, fire stations, and various other City buildings, and projects to install solar power generation systems and replace roofs at various fire stations, as well as several purchase orders and on-call contract services for lighting, plumbing, mechanical work, and equipment.

Nine projects have been completed, and nine of the 15 projects have been awarded to contractors with local offices.

The design consultant and staff are finalizing bid packages for the Aquatic Center Pumping System Upgrades Project and for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning projects at City Hall, the Police Department, and the Corporation Yard. The lighting and solar projects that are currently in construction continue to experience delays as a result of long lead times for material and equipment. A re-design was required for the replacement of the stadium lighting at Tiger Field, which increased the cost for its construction with the addition of new grounding and conductors, replacement of the switch panel, and replacement of the Redding Electric Utility electrical service. The attached Project Status Report provides more detailed information on project status and costs. Staff will continue to return to the Council quarterly to provide progress updates, with the next update on March 21, 2023.

Environmental Review
While the individual projects within this report may be subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines and are individually analyzed, this report is not subject to CEQA, and therefore, no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Project Status Report
Previous Staff Report 05-05-20
Previous Staff Report 04-21-20
Packet Pg. 557
Project # Description Project Type Contract Method
Award/PO
Date
Ratification
Date Contractor
Local Contractor,
Sub, or Supplier? Cost Est Actual Cost
$ to Local
Contractors
Estimated
Completion
Date
Acceptance
Date Project Status

PROJECTS IN CONSTRUCTION
C19-PO-01 Sourcewell purchase order for stadium lighting (Equipment Only) at Alta Mesa Park, Softball Park, South City Park, Buckeye Park, and Caldwell Park Stadium Lighting Purchase Order (Equipment Only) 7/16/2020 7/21/2020 Musco No $ 1,227,941 $ 1,227,941 $ - 12/31/2022 Purchase order with Musco for equipment.

C19-LS-01
Installation of City purchased stadium lighting equipment at Alta Mesa Park, Softball park, South City Park Kiwanis 1, and Tiger Field Stadium Lighting Standard Bid (Installation Only) 3/31/2021 4/20/2021 Builders Solutions, Inc. Yes $ 465,014 $ 820,000 $ 820,000 12/31/2022 All fields except Tiger Field completed. Material delays and redesign caused delays and cost increase.

C19-S-01 Solar PV at Fire Stations 7 & 8 Solar Standard Bid 9/29/2021 10/19/2021 B & B Solar Inc. Yes $ 100,529 $ 98,900 $ 98,900 2/1/2023 Construction nearly complete. Contractor is still waiting for equipment.

C19-S-02 Solar PV & Replace Roofs at Various Fire Stations (Stations 2, 4, 5, and 6) Solar Standard Bid 11/23/2021 12/21/2021 Harbert Roofing, Inc. Yes $ 525,610 $ 426,213 $ 426,213 2/15/2023 Roof construction complete. Solar installations starting but contractor is still waiting for equipment.

C19-L-05
LED Lighting Retrofit at Various Locations (Aquatic Center, Caldwell Park, Fire Stations, MLK Jr Center, Enterprise Park, Old City Hall, Senior Citizens Hall, and California Soccer Park)
Lighting Standard Bid 6/2/2022 6/21/2022 Advanced Lighting Services, Inc.

No $ 386,077 $ 145,255 $ - 1/31/2023 Construction nearly complete. Contractor is waiting on a few materials to complete the work.

C19-L-06 LED Lighting Retrofit at Civic Auditorium Lighting Standard Bid 11/23/2021 12/21/2021 Fluoresco Services, LLC No $ 162,111 $ 77,387 $ - 2/1/2023 Construction on hold due to material delays.

PROJECTS IN DESIGN
C19-M-03 Upgrade HVAC at City Hall & Police Department HVAC Standard Bid $ 888,430 9/1/2023 City reviewing Jacobs's pre-final design package.

C19-M-04 Upgrade HVAC at Caldwell Park Rec Center HVAC Standard Bid $ 120,000 3/31/2023 City working with on-call contractor to obtain a quote.

C19-M-05 Upgrade HVAC at Corp Yard HVAC Standard Bid $ 195,000 11/1/2023 Jacobs preparing design package.

C19-P-03 Upgrade Pumping Control System at the Aquatic Center Plumbing Standard Bid $ 150,000 11/1/2023 Jacobs preparing bid package.

C19-S-03 Solar PV & Replace Roofs - Fire Stations 1 and 3 Solar Standard Bid $ 250,000 TBD Design on hold until future plan for these fire stations is determined.

C19-W-04a Replace Windows at Fire Station 5 Windows Standard Bid $ 15,000 3/1/2023 City will negotiate with a local contractor for this work.

C19-W-04b Replace Windows at Fire Stations 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 Windows Standard Bid $ 153,000 TBD Design on hold until future plan for these fire stations is determined.

C19-M-06 Replace HVAC at Civic Auditorium HVAC Standard Bid $ 3,500,000 TBD Design on hold until City can determine if budget will be available.

C19-S-04 Install Solar and Replace Roof at Civic Auditorium Solar Standard Bid $ 1,600,000 TBD Design on hold until City can determine if budget will be available.

PROJECTS COMPLETE
C19-L-01 LED Lighting Retrofit at three Non Profit Buildings at Diestelhorst Landing. Lighting On-Call Contract 6/9/2020 7/21/2020 B&C Yes $ 48,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 7/9/2020 7/31/2020 Construction completed.

C19-L-02 LED Lighting Retrofit at Library Lighting Standard Bid 11/19/2020 12/15/2020 Clear Blue Energy Corp. No $ 194,263 $ 53,633 $ - 3/1/2021 2/22/2021 Construction completed.

C19-L-03 LED Lighting Retrofit at Corp Yard Lighting Standard Bid 12/15/2020 1/19/2021 Fluoresco Services, LLC No $ 391,117 $ 137,294 $ - 6/22/2021 8/6/2021 Construction completed.

C19-L-04 LED Lighting Retrofit at City Hall and Police Station Lighting Standard Bid 8/2/2021 8/17/2021 Fluoresco Services, LLC No $ 519,000 $ 189,367 $ - 10/1/2022 9/20/2022 Construction complete.

C19-LS-02 Installation of City purchased stadium lighting equipment at Buckeye Park and Caldwell Park
Stadium Lighting Standard Bid
(Installation Only) 2/17/2021 3/16/2021 Builders Solutions, Inc. Yes $ 341,500 $ 319,647 $ 319,647 4/25/2022 5/10/2022 Construction completed.

C19-P-01 Replace Water Heaters in Fire Stations 2, 3, 4, and 6 Plumbing On-Call Contract 6/30/2020 7/21/2020 American Leak Detection Yes $ 49,000 $ 13,050 $ 13,050 9/16/2020 10/2/2020 Construction completed.

C19-P-02 Replace Laundry Facilities in Fire Stations 2, 3, 5, 7, and 8 Plumbing On-Call Contract 6/25/2020 7/21/2020 American Leak Detection Yes $ 17,000 $ 12,759 $ 12,759 9/16/2020 10/2/2020 Construction completed.

C19-M-01 Replace HVAC Units in Fire Stations 1,2,4,6 HVAC On-Call Contract 6/9/2020 7/21/2020 ACCO Yes $ 92,109 $ 95,278 $ 95,278 12/1/2020 11/30/2020 Construction completed.

C19-M-02 Replace HVAC Units in Old City Hall HVAC On-Call Contract 6/15/2020 7/21/2020 ACCO Yes $ 135,755 $ 97,985 $ 97,985 1/20/2021 1/13/2021 Construction completed.

Sub Total: $ 11,526,456 $ 3,727,708 $ 1,896,832

PROJECT MANAGEMENT/DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES C-19-DC-01 Project Management, Design and Construction Services Engineering Consultant PSA 6/9/2020 7/21/2020 Jacobs Engineering Yes $ 1,240,816 On-going design and construction management services Total $ 12,767,272 $ 3,727,708 $ 1,896,832
Project Budget $9 M. Projects will be prioritized and delivered to fit within approved budget
Energy Efficiency Economic Response Plan (EEERP) Project Status Report Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: ^Project Status Report (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the City Manager to award any public works contract, purchase order, or agreements, of any value, associated with the $9.5 million GHG funding approved as part of the Local Economic Stimulus Package.

Fiscal Impact
The City Council has previously approved the allocation of $9.5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for projects that reap an energy savings benefit to the City of Redding. There is no further fiscal impact to granting authority to the City Manager to execute the agreements, purchase orders, and contracts associated with these projects. There may, however, be an added benefit of seeing the money infused more rapidly into the local economy.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements, purchase orders, or contracts associated with the Cap and Trade distribution funds to expedite delivery of the work. This would lengthen the process to use the authorized funding.

Background/Analysis
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020, the City Council unanimously approved the Economic Response Plan. Included in the plan is the allocation of $9.5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for projects associated with the Local Economic Stimulus Package that equate to a savings in energy costs for the City of Redding. By authorizing the City Manager to negotiate, execute, and direct the agreements, purchase orders and contracts, staff can proceed with rapidly assigning the work and awarding bids. The benefit to this is being able to see the Cap and Trade action proceeds go to work as soon as possible in the community, and thereby providing the local MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 9.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(b)--Consider authorizing the City Manager to award energy savings contracts, purchase orders, and agreements related to the Green House Gas (GHG) funding approved by the City Council as part of the Local Economic Stimulus.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 05-05-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 9.1(b)--Authorize City Manager to award energy savings contracts Page 2 economy a direct opportunity to see a quick positive impact to jobs and business activity. The projects within the package may include, , LED light replacement in City facilities, reroofing and some solar installation at Fire Stations, replacing largely older and heavy energy using equipment with newer more efficient equipment, and additional energy saving projects to be determined
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
 Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
 Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”  Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
 Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
 Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 05-05-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the City of Redding Economic Response Plan and provide direction to staff as follows:
(1) Approve deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) hotels and motels. (2) Approve modification of existing Community Assistance for Redding Electric Services (CARES) guidelines.
(3) Approve modification of amortization policy for City of Redding utility bills. (4) Approve the refund of all City of Redding utility deposits. (5) Rescind approval of allocation of Cap and Trade funds for the Wildfire Mitigation and Building Electrification programs; approve Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be distributed to electric customers; and adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 32nd Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 to appropriate a total of $9 million in Greenhouse Gas allotment for utility rebates. (6) Approve adoption of a utility grant program for small businesses utilizing $600,000 of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding.
(7) Economic Stimulus Package
a. Approve additional use of $5 million of Greenhouse Gas allotment and adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 33rd Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 allocating money for projects designated as providing energy savings for the general fund.
b. Provide direction on projects involving utilities funding and borrowing.

Fiscal Impact
The amount of impact of this proposal depends on the City Council’s (Council) direction for staff. The programs implemented thus far are expected to impact the General Fund due to approximately $500,000 in missed revenue projections. Programs such as modifying the Amortization Program guidelines and deferring Transient Occupancy Tax will reduce reserves in the short term by providing cash flow relief to businesses. Using restricted revenue funds to modify existing CARES program guidelines, and also refunding City of Redding utility deposits MEETING DATE: April 21, 2020
ITEM NO. 9.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(b)--Consider Economic Response Plan related to the Covid-19 pandemic's impact on the City and provide direction regarding mitigation measures.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Report to Redding City Council April 16, 2020
Re: 9.1(b)--Economic Response Plan Page 2
and creating a utility grant program for small business will not impact unrestricted reserves. If the additional utility credit is approved, $9 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds would need to be allocated, some of which would be reallocated from previously funded projects, to bring the total allocation to $11 million for utility rebates. To complete projects listed in the Local Economic Stimulus Package, $5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds would need to be allocated in addition to the $4 million already allocated. The Council could also, through approval of this report, provide direction and identify an amount of money to reserve to pay for any potential borrowing for projects that would be approved through the Local Economic Stimulus Package.

Alternative Action
The Council has multiple options with this report. If it chooses to not accept the report in its entirety, all currently implemented programs would cease and no additional community assistance programming would take place at this time. The Council could choose to accept the report, and therefore all of the currently implemented projects as well, and provide direction to staff regarding which new projects to move forward.

Background/Analysis
The Covid-19 global pandemic has been a health catastrophe causing significant disruption in individual, community and societal norms while devastating the economy. The City of Redding, as the local governmental entity, needs to take bold action in line with the State and Federal Government to not only protect the health and welfare of the individual but also of the economy.

The City of Redding City Council will be presented with a number of proposed initiatives and projects to help individuals and businesses through this difficult time. The attached City of Redding Economic Response Plan is a report detailing programming currently implemented, as well as programming that could be implemented to assist the community. These items are varied in cost and source of funding.

Currently implementing
 Maintain City services
 Suspend Return to Owner fees for impounded animals
 Suspend late fees and interest on payments due to the City of Redding  Suspend City of Redding utility shut-offs due to non-payment  Suspend City of Redding utility payment late fees
 Cap and Trade distribution of $50 to every Redding Electric Utility (REU) account holder
Pending approval
 Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax payment from hotel and motel businesses  Modify existing –Community Assistance for Redding Electric Services (CARES) program guidelines to provide opportunity for additional financial assistance to qualifying utility customers
 Modify Utilities Amortization program guidelines to extend the amortization period, and extend the program to commercial customers
 Refund City of Redding utility deposits to residential and commercial customers  Additional Cap and Trade distribution of $200 to every REU account holder  Utility grant program for small businesses
 Local Economic Stimulus Package containing multiple projects that will result in local contract work opportunities and energy savings to the City of Redding Packet Pg. 562 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Report to Redding City Council April 16, 2020
Re: 9.1(b)--Economic Response Plan Page 3
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
 Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
 Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”  Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
 Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
 Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Resolution - GHG Customer Distribution
Resolution - Green House Gas Allotment
COR Economic Response Plan 2020
Packet Pg. 563 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Resolution No. 2020 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 32ND AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2019-050 RESCINDING

APPROVAL OF ALLOCATION OF CAP AND TRADE FUNDS FOR THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION AND BUILDING ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAMS; APPROVE THE APPROPRIATION OF $9,000,000 OF CAP AND TRADE AUCTION PROCEEDS TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO RATEPAYERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-20.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
142 854 GHG Customer Distribution $9,000,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease in Beginning Balance
142-851-01-0001-01 Beginning Balance $ 1,077,910
Decrease in Cap and Trade Revenues
142-851-01-4400-01 Environmental Attributes $ 2,022,090 Elimination of Building Electrification Project
142-854-8908-98 Building Electrification $ 4,000,000
Elimination of Wildfire Mitigation Project
142-854-8908-99 Wildfire Mitigation $ 1,900,000
Increase in GHG Customer Distribution
142-854-8908-90 GHG Customer Distribution $ 9,000,000
Total $ 9,000,000 $ 9,000,000
THAT the purpose is to rescind approval of allocation of Cap and Trade funds for the Wildfire Mitigation and Building Electrification programs; approve the appropriation of $9,000,000 of Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be distributed to ratepayers for fiscal year 2019-20.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of April, 2020 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

Packet Pg. 564 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ADAM McELVAIN, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Resolution No. 2020 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 33RD AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2019-050 APPROVE AND APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL USE OF $5,000,000 OF GREENHOUSE GAS

ALLOTMENT FOR PROJECTS DESIGNED AS PROVIDING ENERGY SAVINGS FOR THE GENERAL FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-20.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
142 854 Energy Efficiency Measures $5,000,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease in Beginning Balance
142-851-01-0001-01 Beginning Balance $ 5,000,000
Increase in Energy Efficiency Measures
142-854-8908-96 Energy Efficiency Measures $ 5,000,000
Total $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000
THAT the purpose is to approve and appropriate additional use of $5,000,000 of Greenhouse Gas allotment allocating money for projects designed as providing energy savings for the General Fund for fiscal year 2019-20.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of April, 2020 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ADAM McELVAIN, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
1 Table of Contents
Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................................2 Plan Elements................................................................................................................................................2 Elements currently implemented .............................................................................................................2 Maintain City Services..........................................................................................................................2 Suspend Return to Owner fees............................................................................................................3 Suspend Late Fees and Interest on City Payments .............................................................................3 Suspend Utility Shut-Off ......................................................................................................................4 Suspend Utility Late Fees.....................................................................................................................4 Distribution of $50 to REU Account Holders.......................................................................................4 Pending the City Council’s approval .........................................................................................................4 Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax...................................................................................................5 Modify Existing CARES Program Guidelines........................................................................................5 Modify Utilities Amortization Program Guidelines.............................................................................5 Refund City of Redding Utilities Deposits............................................................................................6 Additional Cap and Trade Distribution................................................................................................6 Utility Grant Program for Small Businesses ........................................................................................6 Local Economic Stimulus Package........................................................................................................7 Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
2 Executive Summary
The Covid-19 global pandemic is a health catastrophe causing significant disruption in individual, community and societal norms. While the direct human suffering owed to the disease itself is horrific, the damage to the economy due to necessary health precautions is equally devastating. The City of Redding (City), as the local governmental entity, needs to take bold action in line with the State and Federal Government to not only protect the health and welfare of the individual but also that of the local economy. The City of Redding City Council (Council) has directed that a plan be developed to assist the community in economic recovery to coincide with the cessation of the pandemic. This report provides detailed information on the various programs that have been developed to help foster the economy through this economic disaster.

Some programs have already been implemented while others still need final approval from the City Council. In brief, the programs are listed below.

Currently implement Plan Element Value
Suspend Return to Owner fees $200
Suspend late fees and interest on City of
Redding payments
$60,000
Suspend City of Redding utility shut-offs Increased Cash Flow Suspend City of Redding utility late fees $425,000
Distribution of $50 to REU account holders $2,200,000
Plan Element Pending approval
Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax $250,000 Est. deferred Modify existing CARES program guidelines $1,500,000
Modify existing Utilities amortization
program guidelines
Increased Cash Flow
Refund City of Redding utility deposits $3,400,000
Additional Cap and Trade distribution $9,000,000
Utility grant program for small businesses $600,000
Local Economic Stimulus Package $20,000,000
Total Value of City Response Plan Est @ $37,500,000
Plan Elements
Elements currently implemented
Maintain City Services
City services provided to the community are critical in nature and are unable to cease in functionality. A multitude of projects, already in the works, have to continue processing in spite of the pandemic that has affected the nation. In order to keep projects moving forward, and to Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
3 continue to serve the community in this critical capacity, City departments implemented immediate changes to comply with State and Federal directives. Personnel able to work from home were provided resources to do so. Meetings of large groups of staff and/or the public were eliminated, and preparations were made to provide access to public meetings without further endangering the community. As a result of the rapid response of staff, City services continue to function for the bulk of the community. In spite of the closure of City Hall and the diminished personnel in the Avtech and Corp Yard buildings, and the Transfer Station, critical City services such as police, fire, electric, solid waste removal, water and wastewater maintenance, and parks services still operate to the benefit of the community. Each position, whether working from home or in the office, is a critical component of maintaining the support of these services. Department directors monitor work product and load to ensure the City continues to function efficiently. The City is providing increased availability of cleaning supplies and sanitizing materials to offices and meeting spaces to maintain worker health.

To provide additional relief to residents and business owners, several programming decisions were implemented. Taking into consideration the varied economic status of Redding residents and businesses, the following steps were taken to provide some help financially.

Suspend Return to Owner fees
Effective March 23, 2020, Haven Humane Society suspended the charging of return to owner fees for animals impounded for running at large. A small portion of the fee is typically returned to the City to recoup costs of providing animal regulation services for the community. The total cost is expected to be less than $200 for the City. This allows Haven to reduce the number of animals left in the shelter while it is being operated at minimum capacity, and it is a benefit for community members who are unable to make the payment at this time.

Suspend Late Fees and Interest on City Payments
The City has initiated the suspension of late fees and penalties for payments and all General Accounts Receivable for items like hangar rents and imposed fines. This is made possible through individual review of accounts as payments are submitted and the reporting is analyzed. Both systems are housed in the legacy system so adjustments are applied manually to individual accounts. The $35 returned check and returned ACH payment fees have been suspended as well. Returned check and ACH fees are charged on an individual basis, and returned items are reported from the City’s banking system daily. When applicable, the returned item amount with the additional fee are typically charged back to established accounts. The fee will be eliminated from these charge backs.

The current plan is to suspend penalties and interest for receivables due in March and April 2020, which would include payments due in April and May. Based on last year’s activities, it is estimated that the loss of revenue to the general fund from the suspensions will be $55,000. The suspension of the returned check and ACH fees is estimated to be $5,000 for the same time period. If extended an additional month through the end of the fiscal year (June 30, 2020), the savings to the community equates to an estimated $60,000 which will result in an equal amount of lost revenue for the City.

Packet Pg. 570 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
4 Suspend Utility Shut-Off
Effective March 18, 2020, the City of Redding Utilities Customer Service suspended the practice of utility shut-offs due to non-payment. Each month, under normal circumstances, approximately 220 utility accounts are disconnected after failure to pay for utility service received over the previous 60 days. Typically, 75 percent of these customers pay their past due amount and have their utilities reconnected within two weeks. With the Covid-19 pandemic and the anticipated increase in the number of utility customers having difficulty keeping up with all of their monthly expenses, it was decided that loss of utility service should not contribute to the stress and anxiety already experienced. Once the pandemic has passed, the Customer Services division will work with customers using various tools to bring the accounts into good standing. It is known that this effort will result in a temporary increase in accounts receivable and decreased cash flow for all utilities – resulting in an equal amount of temporary financial relief to residents of the City of Redding. This measure may result in an increase in bad debt expense, however, additional proposed measures, listed later in this report, could assist in reducing bad debt expense.

Furthermore, bad debt would be sent to a collection agency with a recovery rate of approximately 30 percent.

Suspend Utility Late Fees
Like shut-offs, late fees for utility payments have been suspended. Late fees, historically, amount to $1.7 million per year. While late fee collections are not always linear, it is a close approximation that the suspension will save customers in excess of $425,000 due to the high potential that there will be an increase in late payments. Late fees are an administrative penalty, and therefore, are deposited in the General Fund. If it is assumed that there will be no attempt to collect the past-due late fees, the General Fund will miss revenue projections in this category by at least $425,000.

Distribution of $50 to REU Account Holders
The City Council approved the distribution of excess reserves to be credited to every Redding Electric Utility customer in December 2019 in the amount of $50 per account. The funding source for the distribution is the Greenhouse Gas Allowance Auction Proceeds (also referred to as GHG or Cap and Trade), in an amount equal to about $2.2 million, and will be accomplished via a bill credit.

Pending the City Council’s approval
The following programming ideas were developed to provide additional options to provide financial relief to residents and businesses. These plan elements vary in how they target a diverse set of community members. Reaching as much of the community as possible is crucial for Redding to solidify its economic foundation. These proposals require the City Council’s approval to proceed. Some of the following items can be implemented immediately, while others will need to be further developed and brought back to the Council for further direction.

Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
5 Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax
Defer payment of TOT from hotel and motel business until August 1, 2020 (payment due August 19, 2020). This deferral would be interest free and full payback would be made by November 1, 2020. The TOT deferral program could provide for much need cash flow for the Hotel and Motel industry by allowing an estimated $250,000 to remain with the business for operating expense. This program would be limited to Hotels/Motels with Business Licenses of 65-40-1 or 65-50-1.

Modify Existing CARES Program Guidelines
Community Assistance for Redding Electric Services (CARES) provides up to $300 of emergency assistance for the electric portion of bills for City of Redding utility customers. The intent of the CARES program is to help customers who have suffered a temporary financial hardship and to bring their account to a current status. Customers are eligible for CARES assistance once every 12 months. This program is funded out of the Public Benefits charges included in each ratepayers’ bill. Staff recommends applying a $300 CARES credit to all residential customers enrolled in the Residential Energy Discount Program (REU’s low income program). This would provide $1.2 million of immediate utility cost relief to our lowest-income customers with an additional $600,000 of additional relief available to those who may apply due to becoming eligible due to impacts from covid-19. These funds would be replenished with the new budget year beginning on July 1, 2020. Should the Council choose to do this, staff recommends providing the Electric Utility Director authority to repeat this process, should the Stay at Home order continue through the summer, and also suspend the once-per-year limitation for applicants. This would have no impact on the Electric Utility’s financial metrics as defined in Council Policy 1414, as Public Benefit Programs are restricted.

Modify Utilities Amortization Program Guidelines
The City of Redding Utilities Customer Service provides amortization for residential customer bills that are past due. This allows customers to “catch-up” on their bill for up to 12 months by amortizing the past-due balance. Staff recommends temporarily expanding this to commercial customers and temporarily extending the amortization for a period of up to 24 months, which would essentially provide a zero percent loan to customers that are past-due and having trouble paying their bill. In addition, this would allow commercial customers who receive Small Business Administration Loans to focus on other essential costs. This would have a temporary impact on City of Redding Utilities, as cash would not be received for up to two years. The risk to the utilities would be any eventual non-performance of these loans; non-performance would mean not paying the full amortization over the 24-month period. Therefore, staff recommends establishing an “eligibility criteria” that the customer must have not been disconnected for nonpayment of utilities in the previous year to be automatically approved for the amortization.

Customers not eligible for automatic amortization may still request it and approval will be granted on a case by case basis. Should the Council choose to do this, Staff recommends providing the Electric Utility Director administrative authority to modify program elements as necessary. As this could affect water, wastewater, and solid waste utilities, the Public Works Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
6 Director would collaborate in these decisions. This plan element will potentially provide millions of dollars in available cash flow for residents and businesses.

Refund City of Redding Utilities Deposits
Staff recommends returning all customer deposits held by Utilities Customer Services. This would return approximately $3.4 million to customers, including approximately $600,000 to commercial customers. The City holds utility deposits on customer accounts that present a higher credit risk to the utilities. By returning deposits, the City is returning monies to customers most in need. This would have no immediate impact on the Electric Utility’s financial metrics as defined in Council Policy 1414 as customer deposits are not included in unrestricted reserves for the purpose of calculating days of cash on hand. The risk to the utilities would be future bad debt accruals of non-payment of utilities by customers who have demonstrated difficulty paying bills.

However, this bad debt would be sent to a collection agency with a recovery rate of approximately 30 percent. Should the Council choose to do this, Staff recommends providing the Electric Utility Director authority to modify administrative processes for billing future utility deposits as defined in City Council Policy 1404. The deposit requirement will be reinstated at an unknown time in the future.

Additional Cap and Trade Distribution
Staff recommends a $200 credit on Electric utility bills to all customers out of Cap and Trade auction proceeds, which is similar to the $50 refund recently approved by Council. This would provide an additional $9 million in rebates to electric utility customers, bringing the total rebate amount, including the Council’s action on March 26, 2020, to approximately $11 million. To fund this program, the Council would need to allocate the balance of current year Cap and Trade revenues and cancel two Council-approved programs that have yet to launch: Wildfire Mitigation and Building Electrification. Wildfire Mitigation has yet to start due to the California Air Resources Board not providing a quantification methodology for reduced greenhouse gasses achieved through fuels reduction, thus the Cap and Trade funds are not available for this purpose. Building Electrification has yet to start due to staffing limitations. This would have no impact on the Electric Utility’s financial metrics as defined in Council Policy 1414 as Cap and Trade revenues are restricted.

Utility Grant Program for Small Businesses
As an entitlement city for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) the City receives an annual allocation of Community Development Block Grant funding which is used for public service and public improvements. Due to the Federal CARES act the City received an additional allocation of $447,450. This funding, combined with unused funding from past projects, for a total of $600,000 provides the City an opportunity to provide funding toward eligible small business utility payments for those in the most need or are unable to receive Federal assistance or grants. If approved, staff will present the program and the amount available as part of the required public hearing to approve the use of the funding.

Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
7 Local Economic Stimulus Package
The Local Economic Stimulus Package is composed of multi-departmental projects intended to result in a combination of benefits to the City. In its infancy, this was a mass project designed to create an energy savings with each completed project. The City, however, has multiple deferred maintenance projects that must be completed to maintain the infrastructure stability of its assets.

Staff developed the following plan in a response to a need to merge the energy savings needs of the City with its deferred maintenance needs and infuse much needed capital into the local economy.

The projects in this package were specifically chosen as critical needs either in the realm of energy savings, which qualifies the project to be paid for through GHG auction proceeds, or for its contribution to eliminating the deferred maintenance needs of the City. A combination of GHG funding, utility reserves, municipal bond, and energy cost savings would be used to fund the package with little or no net budgetary impact to the General Fund. The total value of the economic stimulus package is estimated at approximately $20 million. Approximately $9.5 million of GHG money could be allocated for the completion of the projects that realize an energy savings for the City. The energy savings over time for the General Fund could be used to fund the deferred maintenance needs.

Several of the anticipated projects such as the work at various fire stations and lighting upgrades would be started immediately and put out to bid as soon as possible. Other projects, such as the replacement of the heating and air conditioning system at the Civic Auditorium will need to be analyzed further. The intent is to move quickly to infuse available GHG funds and provide economic benefit for the community.

The calculated energy savings from the energy savings projects could be used to secure bond funding to accelerate up to another $10 million in local projects including improvements to the Redding Aquatic Center, park facilities, required building maintenance, and other amenities.

Staff will return to the City Council with a full project list and borrowing options should the City Council provide direction to do so.

Completion of projects totaling up to $20 million is quite a large endeavor. However, the plan would be to bid multiple smaller projects to provide the best opportunity for local contractors to participate in the process, and thereby providing the local economy a direct opportunity to see quick and significant economic benefit in jobs and business activity. According to multipliers provided by the Shasta County Economic Development Corporation, the City of Redding would see a direct benefit equal to 328 jobs and $30 million of economic impact.

Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(j)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the Local Appointments List consisting of Exhibits A and B relative to 2023 term expirations and vacancies for City of Redding Boards, Commissions, and Committees to fulfill the requirements of Government Code Section 54972 (Maddy Act).

Fiscal Impact
There are minor costs (staff time) to prepare the information that is required to comply with the Maddy Act.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could decline to approve the Local Appointments List, consisting of Exhibits A and B. This would result in the City of Redding being in violation of Government Code Section 54972.

Background
Government Code Section 54972 provides that on or before December 31 of each year, a list of appointments of all ongoing boards, commissions, and committees appointed by the Council shall be prepared and submitted as follows:
• A list of all appointive terms which will expire during the next calendar year, with the name of the incumbent appointee, the date of appointment, the date the term expires, and the necessary qualifications for the position – Exhibit A. • A list of all boards, commissions, and committees whose members serve at the pleasure of the Council and the necessary qualifications for each position – Exhibit B.

MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.12(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.12(a)--Government Code Requirements regarding Commissions, Boards, and Committees (Maddy Act).

Pamela Mize, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 575
Report to Redding City Council December 13, 2022
Re: 4.12(a)--Maddy Act Requirements Page 2
Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Attachments
Exhibit A
Exhibit B
Packet Pg. 576
Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Exhibit A (4.12(a)--Maddy Act Requirements) Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Exhibit B (4.12(a)--Maddy Act Requirements) Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Exhibit B (4.12(a)--Maddy Act Requirements) Packet Pg. 580 Attachment: Exhibit B (4.12(a)--Maddy Act Requirements)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution approving an amendment to the Redding Independent Employees’ Organization (RIEO) Clerical, Technical and Professional Non-Exempt and Exempt Schedule of Classifications and Wage Rates changing classification titles effective December 25, 2022.

Fiscal Impact
There will be no fiscal impact directly resulting from the approval of the title changes for existing classifications.

Alternative Action
The City Council could decline to approve the resolution, and the classification titles would remain unchanged.

Background/Analysis
Staff is recommending several changes to the City of Redding’s (City) classification titles to more accurately reflect the evolving business needs.

As the City migrates from a custom AS400 based software system to a new Enterprise Resource Plan using an Oracle software system, staff who have been designing and maintaining the AS400 custom software applications in the Information Technology Department will need to perform work that supports integrated modules and/or business applications in the future. Therefore, staff is recommending changing the titles of the current Systems Analyst/Computer Programmer I/II/III series to an Applications Analyst I/II/ III series to better reflect the shifting business needs MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.15(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.15(a) - Adopt Resolution approving amendments to the Redding Independent Employees' Organization Clerical, Technical and Professional Unit Non-Exempt and Exempt Schedule of Classifications and Wage Rates changing classification titles effective December 25, 2022.

Sheri DeMaagd, Assistant
City Manager
Packet Pg. 581
Report to Redding City Council December 13, 2022
Re: 4.15(a)--Amendment to Salary Schedules for RIEO CTP Page 2 of the department. This classification series will continue to support the City as a whole in software testing, application configurations, and data retrieval. Further, the adoption of this administrative change will allow the Information Technology Department to recruit applicants with needed experience in Microsoft SQL administration, SQL Server Agent, Oracle, and Crystal Reports. The existing wage rates would remain unchanged.

Additionally, the City’s Project Coordinator classification series (Assistant, Associate and Senior) performs professional project and program coordination and management in the assigned areas of Housing, Community Services, and Information Technology. Other departments have indicated a desire to be able to use these positions to fill important roles. Therefore, staff recommends consolidation of the three separate Project Coordinator series into two separate Project Coordinator series – one for community-based work and one for technology-based work.

The existing wage rates would remain unchanged.

Finally, the duties of the Parking Violation Officer have changed in order to better reflect modern practices of parking enforcement. Therefore, it is recommended that the title of Parking Violation Officer change to Parking Enforcement Officer. The existing wage rates would remain unchanged.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^RIEO Resolution - Change Classification Titles 12.20.22 RIEO CTP Exempt-December 25, 2022
RIEO CTP Exempt-July 23, 2023
RIEO CTP Exempt-July 21, 2024
RIEO CTP Non-Exempt-December 25, 2022
RIEO CTP Non-Exempt-July 23, 2023
RIEO CTP Non-Exempt-July 21, 2024
Packet Pg. 582
RESOLUTION NO. 2022-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

APPROVING ADJUSTMENT TO THE REDDING INDEPENDENT
EMPLOYEES’ ORGANIZATION – CLERICAL, TECHNICAL, AND

PROFESSIONAL UNIT NON-EXEMPT AND EXEMPT SCHEDULE OF

CLASSIFICATIONS AND HOURLY WAGE RATES CHANGING
CLASSIFICATION TITLES EFFECTIVE DECEMBER 25, 2022
WHEREAS, staff has recommended that the Redding Independent Employees’ Organization – Clerical, Technical and Professional Unit Non-Exempt and Exempt Schedule of Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates be amended to change classification titles effective December 25, 2022; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to be in the best interest of the City to adopt such recommendation;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council that the Redding Independent Employees’ Organization – Clerical, Technical and Professional Unit NonExempt and Exempt Schedule of Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates be amended to change classification titles effective December 25, 2022.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 20th day of December, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________
MICHAEL DAQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
________________________________ ___________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 583 Attachment: ^RIEO Resolution - Change Classification Titles 12.20.22 (4.15(a)--Amendment to Salary Schedules for RIEO CTP) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
118 Associate Civil Engineer $6,909 $7,254 $7,617 $7,998 $8,398 $8,817 $9,258 $9,721 240 Senior Project Coordinator - Housing $6,886 $7,230 $7,592 $7,971 $8,370 $8,788 $9,228 $9,689 146 Senior Project Coordinator - Community Services $6,886 $7,230 $7,592 $7,971 $8,370 $8,788 $9,228 $9,689 243 Senior Project Coordinator - Technical Information Technology $6,886 $7,230 $7,592 $7,971 $8,370 $8,788 $9,228 $9,689 119 Senior Planner $6,675 $7,009 $7,360 $7,728 $8,114 $8,520 $8,946 $9,393 218 Senior Transportation Planner $6,611 $6,941 $7,288 $7,653 $8,035 $8,437 $8,859 $9,302 139 Senior GIS Analyst $6,481 $6,805 $7,146 $7,503 $7,878 $8,272 $8,686 $9,120 223 Plan Check Engineer $6,421 $6,742 $7,079 $7,433 $7,805 $8,195 $8,605 $9,035 225 Senior Survey Party Chief $6,371 $6,689 $7,024 $7,375 $7,744 $8,131 $8,538 $8,964 132 Traffic Engineer/Planner $6,329 $6,645 $6,977 $7,326 $7,693 $8,077 $8,481 $8,905 174 Applications Analyst III Systems Analyst/Programmer III $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,656 $8,039 $8,440 $8,863 158 Associate Project Coordinator - Community Services $6,257 $6,570 $6,899 $7,244 $7,606 $7,986 $8,385 $8,805 227 Associate Project Coordinator - Housing $6,257 $6,570 $6,899 $7,244 $7,606 $7,986 $8,385 $8,805 230 Associate Project Coordinator - Technical Information Technology $6,257 $6,570 $6,899 $7,244 $7,606 $7,986 $8,385 $8,805 140 Associate Environmental Specialist $6,199 $6,509 $6,834 $7,176 $7,535 $7,912 $8,307 $8,723 141 Associate Planner $6,009 $6,310 $6,625 $6,957 $7,304 $7,670 $8,053 $8,456 178 Transportation Planner $6,009 $6,310 $6,625 $6,957 $7,304 $7,670 $8,053 $8,456 148 Senior Fire Protection Plans Examiner $5,839 $6,131 $6,437 $6,759 $7,097 $7,452 $7,824 $8,216 162 Senior Plan Checker $5,839 $6,131 $6,437 $6,759 $7,097 $7,452 $7,824 $8,216 233 Survey Party Chief $5,791 $6,081 $6,385 $6,704 $7,040 $7,392 $7,761 $8,149 167 Safety Specialist $5,785 $6,074 $6,378 $6,697 $7,031 $7,383 $7,752 $8,140 163 Assistant Engineer $5,768 $6,057 $6,360 $6,677 $7,011 $7,362 $7,730 $8,117 229 Applications Analyst II Systems Analyst/Programmer II $5,713 $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,655 $8,038 154 Accountant II $5,681 $5,965 $6,264 $6,577 $6,906 $7,251 $7,614 $7,994 232 Management Analyst II $5,681 $5,965 $6,264 $6,577 $6,906 $7,251 $7,614 $7,994 207 Senior Marketing Specialist $5,669 $5,953 $6,251 $6,563 $6,891 $7,236 $7,598 $7,977 204 Senior Building Inspector $5,456 $5,729 $6,015 $6,316 $6,632 $6,964 $7,312 $7,677 206 Industrial Waste Analyst Grade III $5,401 $5,671 $5,955 $6,252 $6,565 $6,893 $7,238 $7,600 205 Industrial Waste Analyst Grade II $5,269 $5,533 $5,809 $6,100 $6,405 $6,725 $7,061 $7,414 234 Plans Examiner $5,240 $5,502 $5,777 $6,066 $6,370 $6,688 $7,023 $7,374 228 Applications Analyst I Systems Analyst/Programmer I $5,181 $5,440 $5,712 $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 219 Assistant Project Coordinator - Housing $4,998 $5,248 $5,511 $5,786 $6,075 $6,379 $6,698 $7,033 159 Assistant Project Coordinator - Community Services $4,998 $5,248 $5,511 $5,786 $6,075 $6,379 $6,698 $7,033 226 Assistant Project Coordinator - Technical Information Technology $4,998 $5,248 $5,511 $5,786 $6,075 $6,379 $6,698 $7,033 177 Assistant Planner $4,986 $5,235 $5,497 $5,772 $6,061 $6,364 $6,682 $7,016 239 Senior Buyer $4,981 $5,230 $5,491 $5,766 $6,054 $6,357 $6,675 $7,008 325 Landscape Planning Specialist $4,979 $5,228 $5,490 $5,764 $6,052 $6,355 $6,673 $7,006 199 Accountant I $4,930 $5,177 $5,436 $5,707 $5,993 $6,292 $6,607 $6,937 231 Management Analyst I $4,930 $5,177 $5,436 $5,707 $5,993 $6,292 $6,607 $6,937 198 Communication Marketing Coordinator $4,930 $5,177 $5,436 $5,707 $5,993 $6,292 $6,607 $6,937 238 Buyer $4,448 $4,670 $4,904 $5,149 $5,406 $5,676 $5,960 $6,258 189 Contract Compliance Technician $4,258 $4,471 $4,695 $4,929 $5,176 $5,435 $5,706 $5,992 Note: Pay rates are calculated utilizing a standardized formula and small differences may occur due to rounding.

Monthly Salary Rates – Salary Steps

REDDING INDEPENDENT EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION

CLERICAL, TECHNICAL AND PROFESSIONAL UNIT
EXHIBIT "B-1"

EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SCHEDULE OF CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY RANGES Effective: December 25, 2022
Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: RIEO CTP Exempt-December 25, 2022 (4.15(a)--Amendment to Salary Schedules for RIEO CTP) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
118 Associate Civil Engineer $7,254 $7,617 $7,998 $8,398 $8,817 $9,258 $9,721 $10,207 146 Senior Project Coordinator - Community $7,230 $7,592 $7,971 $8,370 $8,788 $9,228 $9,689 $10,174 243 Senior Project Coordinator - Technical $7,230 $7,592 $7,971 $8,370 $8,788 $9,228 $9,689 $10,174 119 Senior Planner $7,009 $7,360 $7,728 $8,114 $8,520 $8,946 $9,393 $9,862 218 Senior Transportation Planner $6,941 $7,288 $7,653 $8,035 $8,437 $8,859 $9,302 $9,767 139 Senior GIS Analyst $6,805 $7,146 $7,503 $7,878 $8,272 $8,686 $9,120 $9,576 223 Plan Check Engineer $6,742 $7,079 $7,433 $7,805 $8,195 $8,605 $9,035 $9,487 225 Senior Survey Party Chief $6,689 $7,024 $7,375 $7,744 $8,131 $8,538 $8,964 $9,413 132 Traffic Engineer/Planner $6,645 $6,977 $7,326 $7,693 $8,077 $8,481 $8,905 $9,350 174 Applications Analyst III $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,656 $8,039 $8,440 $8,863 $9,306 158 Associate Project Coordinator - Community $6,570 $6,899 $7,244 $7,606 $7,986 $8,385 $8,805 $9,245 230 Associate Project Coordinator - Technical $6,570 $6,899 $7,244 $7,606 $7,986 $8,385 $8,805 $9,245 140 Associate Environmental Specialist $6,509 $6,834 $7,176 $7,535 $7,912 $8,307 $8,723 $9,159 141 Associate Planner $6,310 $6,625 $6,957 $7,304 $7,670 $8,053 $8,456 $8,879 178 Transportation Planner $6,310 $6,625 $6,957 $7,304 $7,670 $8,053 $8,456 $8,879 148 Senior Fire Protection Plans Examiner $6,131 $6,437 $6,759 $7,097 $7,452 $7,824 $8,216 $8,626 162 Senior Plan Checker $6,131 $6,437 $6,759 $7,097 $7,452 $7,824 $8,216 $8,626 233 Survey Party Chief $6,081 $6,385 $6,704 $7,040 $7,392 $7,761 $8,149 $8,557 167 Safety Specialist $6,074 $6,378 $6,697 $7,031 $7,383 $7,752 $8,140 $8,547 163 Assistant Engineer $6,057 $6,360 $6,677 $7,011 $7,362 $7,730 $8,117 $8,522 229 Applications Analyst II $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,655 $8,038 $8,440 154 Accountant II $5,965 $6,264 $6,577 $6,906 $7,251 $7,614 $7,994 $8,394 232 Management Analyst II $5,965 $6,264 $6,577 $6,906 $7,251 $7,614 $7,994 $8,394 207 Senior Marketing Specialist $5,953 $6,251 $6,563 $6,891 $7,236 $7,598 $7,977 $8,376 204 Senior Building Inspector $5,729 $6,015 $6,316 $6,632 $6,964 $7,312 $7,677 $8,061 206 Industrial Waste Analyst Grade III $5,671 $5,955 $6,252 $6,565 $6,893 $7,238 $7,600 $7,980 205 Industrial Waste Analyst Grade II $5,533 $5,809 $6,100 $6,405 $6,725 $7,061 $7,414 $7,785 234 Plans Examiner $5,502 $5,777 $6,066 $6,370 $6,688 $7,023 $7,374 $7,742 228 Applications Analyst I $5,440 $5,712 $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,655 159 Assistant Project Coordinator - Community $5,248 $5,511 $5,786 $6,075 $6,379 $6,698 $7,033 $7,385 226 Assistant Project Coordinator - Technical $5,248 $5,511 $5,786 $6,075 $6,379 $6,698 $7,033 $7,385 177 Assistant Planner $5,235 $5,497 $5,772 $6,061 $6,364 $6,682 $7,016 $7,367 239 Senior Buyer $5,230 $5,491 $5,766 $6,054 $6,357 $6,675 $7,008 $7,359 325 Landscape Planning Specialist $5,228 $5,490 $5,764 $6,052 $6,355 $6,673 $7,006 $7,357 199 Accountant I $5,177 $5,436 $5,707 $5,993 $6,292 $6,607 $6,937 $7,284 231 Management Analyst I $5,177 $5,436 $5,707 $5,993 $6,292 $6,607 $6,937 $7,284 198 Communication Marketing Coordinator $5,177 $5,436 $5,707 $5,993 $6,292 $6,607 $6,937 $7,284 238 Buyer $4,670 $4,904 $5,149 $5,406 $5,676 $5,960 $6,258 $6,571 189 Contract Compliance Technician $4,471 $4,695 $4,929 $5,176 $5,435 $5,706 $5,992 $6,291 Note: Pay rates are calculated utilizing a standardized formula and small differences may occur due to rounding.

Monthly Salary Rates – Salary Steps

REDDING INDEPENDENT EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION

CLERICAL, TECHNICAL AND PROFESSIONAL UNIT
EXHIBIT "B-2"

EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SCHEDULE OF CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY RANGES Effective: July 23, 2023
Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: RIEO CTP Exempt-July 23, 2023 (4.15(a)--Amendment to Salary Schedules for RIEO CTP) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
118 Associate Civil Engineer $7,617 $7,998 $8,398 $8,817 $9,258 $9,721 $10,207 $10,718 146 Senior Project Coordinator - Community $7,592 $7,971 $8,370 $8,788 $9,228 $9,689 $10,174 $10,682 243 Senior Project Coordinator - Technical $7,592 $7,971 $8,370 $8,788 $9,228 $9,689 $10,174 $10,682 119 Senior Planner $7,360 $7,728 $8,114 $8,520 $8,946 $9,393 $9,862 $10,356 218 Senior Transportation Planner $7,288 $7,653 $8,035 $8,437 $8,859 $9,302 $9,767 $10,255 139 Senior GIS Analyst $7,146 $7,503 $7,878 $8,272 $8,686 $9,120 $9,576 $10,055 223 Plan Check Engineer $7,079 $7,433 $7,805 $8,195 $8,605 $9,035 $9,487 $9,961 225 Senior Survey Party Chief $7,024 $7,375 $7,744 $8,131 $8,538 $8,964 $9,413 $9,883 132 Traffic Engineer/Planner $6,977 $7,326 $7,693 $8,077 $8,481 $8,905 $9,350 $9,818 174 Applications Analyst III $6,944 $7,291 $7,656 $8,039 $8,440 $8,863 $9,306 $9,771 158 Associate Project Coordinator - Community $6,899 $7,244 $7,606 $7,986 $8,385 $8,805 $9,245 $9,707 230 Associate Project Coordinator - Technical $6,899 $7,244 $7,606 $7,986 $8,385 $8,805 $9,245 $9,707 140 Associate Environmental Specialist $6,834 $7,176 $7,535 $7,912 $8,307 $8,723 $9,159 $9,617 141 Associate Planner $6,625 $6,957 $7,304 $7,670 $8,053 $8,456 $8,879 $9,322 178 Transportation Planner $6,625 $6,957 $7,304 $7,670 $8,053 $8,456 $8,879 $9,322 148 Senior Fire Protection Plans Examiner $6,437 $6,759 $7,097 $7,452 $7,824 $8,216 $8,626 $9,058 162 Senior Plan Checker $6,437 $6,759 $7,097 $7,452 $7,824 $8,216 $8,626 $9,058 233 Survey Party Chief $6,385 $6,704 $7,040 $7,392 $7,761 $8,149 $8,557 $8,985 167 Safety Specialist $6,378 $6,697 $7,031 $7,383 $7,752 $8,140 $8,547 $8,974 163 Assistant Engineer $6,360 $6,677 $7,011 $7,362 $7,730 $8,117 $8,522 $8,948 229 Applications Analyst II $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,655 $8,038 $8,440 $8,862 154 Accountant II $6,264 $6,577 $6,906 $7,251 $7,614 $7,994 $8,394 $8,814 232 Management Analyst II $6,264 $6,577 $6,906 $7,251 $7,614 $7,994 $8,394 $8,814 207 Senior Marketing Specialist $6,251 $6,563 $6,891 $7,236 $7,598 $7,977 $8,376 $8,795 204 Senior Building Inspector $6,015 $6,316 $6,632 $6,964 $7,312 $7,677 $8,061 $8,464 206 Industrial Waste Analyst Grade III $5,955 $6,252 $6,565 $6,893 $7,238 $7,600 $7,980 $8,379 205 Industrial Waste Analyst Grade II $5,809 $6,100 $6,405 $6,725 $7,061 $7,414 $7,785 $8,174 234 Plans Examiner $5,777 $6,066 $6,370 $6,688 $7,023 $7,374 $7,742 $8,129 228 Applications Analyst I $5,712 $5,998 $6,298 $6,613 $6,944 $7,291 $7,655 $8,038 159 Assistant Project Coordinator - Community $5,511 $5,786 $6,075 $6,379 $6,698 $7,033 $7,385 $7,754 226 Assistant Project Coordinator - Technical $5,511 $5,786 $6,075 $6,379 $6,698 $7,033 $7,385 $7,754 177 Assistant Planner $5,497 $5,772 $6,061 $6,364 $6,682 $7,016 $7,367 $7,735 239 Senior Buyer $5,491 $5,766 $6,054 $6,357 $6,675 $7,008 $7,359 $7,727 325 Landscape Planning Specialist $5,490 $5,764 $6,052 $6,355 $6,673 $7,006 $7,357 $7,724 199 Accountant I $5,436 $5,707 $5,993 $6,292 $6,607 $6,937 $7,284 $7,649 231 Management Analyst I $5,436 $5,707 $5,993 $6,292 $6,607 $6,937 $7,284 $7,649 198 Communication Marketing Coordinator $5,436 $5,707 $5,993 $6,292 $6,607 $6,937 $7,284 $7,649 238 Buyer $4,904 $5,149 $5,406 $5,676 $5,960 $6,258 $6,571 $6,900 189 Contract Compliance Technician $4,695 $4,929 $5,176 $5,435 $5,706 $5,992 $6,291 $6,606 Note: Pay rates are calculated utilizing a standardized formula and small differences may occur due to rounding.

Monthly Salary Rates – Salary Steps

REDDING INDEPENDENT EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION

CLERICAL, TECHNICAL AND PROFESSIONAL UNIT
EXHIBIT "B-3"

EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SCHEDULE OF CLASSIFICATIONS AND SALARY RANGES Effective: July 21, 2024
Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: RIEO CTP Exempt-July 21, 2024 (4.15(a)--Amendment to Salary Schedules for RIEO CTP) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6
####### ####### ###### ###### #######
930 Student Aid $15.01 $15.76 $16.55 $17.38
932 Mail Courier $15.01 $15.76 $16.55 $17.38
933 Technical Intern $15.01 $15.76 $16.55 $17.38
344 Scale House Attendant I $15.57 $16.35 $17.17 $18.02 $18.93 $19.87 398 Clerk I $15.57 $16.35 $17.17 $18.02 $18.93 $19.87
978 Janitor $15.68 $16.47 $17.29 $18.15 $19.06 $20.01
383 Reprographics Technician I $16.07 $16.87 $17.71 $18.60 $19.53 $20.50 345 Scale House Attendant II $17.22 $18.09 $18.99 $19.94 $20.94 $21.98 397 Clerk II $17.22 $18.09 $18.99 $19.94 $20.94 $21.98
390 Administrative Assistant I $17.85 $18.74 $19.68 $20.66 $21.69 $22.78 393 Account Clerk I $18.77 $19.70 $20.69 $21.72 $22.81 $23.95 384 Reprographics Technician II $18.77 $19.70 $20.69 $21.72 $22.81 $23.95 346 Scale House Attendant III $18.89 $19.83 $20.82 $21.86 $22.96 $24.11 373 Clerk III $18.89 $19.83 $20.82 $21.86 $22.96 $24.11 377 Administrative Assistant II $19.60 $20.58 $21.61 $22.69 $23.82 $25.02 374 Crime Analysis Technician $19.67 $20.66 $21.69 $22.77 $23.91 $25.11 341 Development Services Technician I $20.59 $21.62 $22.70 $23.84 $25.03 $26.28 370 Account Clerk II $20.73 $21.77 $22.86 $24.00 $25.20 $26.46 368 Parking Enforcement Violation Officer $21.11 $22.17 $23.28 $24.44 $25.66 $26.95 969 Graphic Designer I $21.38 $22.45 $23.57 $24.75 $25.99 $27.29 369 Housing Technician $21.50 $22.57 $23.70 $24.88 $26.13 $27.43 359 Police Records Technician I $21.61 $22.69 $23.82 $25.02 $26.27 $27.58 364 Executive Assistant I $21.73 $22.81 $23.95 $25.15 $26.41 $27.73 363 Computer Support Specialist I $21.98 $23.07 $24.23 $25.44 $26.71 $28.05 565 Wastewater Plant Operator-in-Training $25.78 $27.07 $28.42 362 Accounting Specialist $22.31 $23.43 $24.60 $25.83 $27.12 $28.47 385 Reprographics Technician III $22.31 $23.43 $24.60 $25.83 $27.12 $28.47 351 Customer Service Representative $22.33 $23.44 $24.62 $25.85 $27.14 $28.50 357 Engineering Aid $22.52 $23.65 $24.83 $26.08 $27.38 $28.75 566 Water Plant Operator-in-Training $26.77 $28.11 $29.52 968 Graphic Designer II $23.58 $24.75 $25.99 $27.29 $28.66 $30.09 352 Development Services Technician II $23.63 $24.81 $26.05 $27.36 $28.72 $30.16 361 Computer/Network Technician I $23.69 $24.87 $26.11 $27.42 $28.79 $30.23 371 Police Records Technician II $23.83 $25.02 $26.27 $27.58 $28.96 $30.41 360 Executive Assistant II $24.94 $26.19 $27.50 $28.87 $30.32 $31.83 Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6
335 Crime Statistician $25.12 $26.37 $27.69 $29.08 $30.53 $32.06 332 Engineering Technician I $25.27 $26.53 $27.86 $29.25 $30.72 $32.25 358 Business License Specialist $25.77 $27.06 $28.41 $29.83 $31.32 $32.89 392 Records Specialist I $25.77 $27.06 $28.41 $29.83 $31.32 $32.89 372 Fire Prevention Specialist $25.95 $27.24 $28.61 $30.04 $31.54 $33.12 Hourly Wage Rate - Salary Step

REDDING INDEPENDENT EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION

CLERICAL, TECHNICAL AND PROFESSIONAL UNIT
EXHIBIT "A-1"

NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SCHEDULE OF CLASSIFICATIONS AND HOURLY WAGE RATES Effective: December 25, 2022
Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: RIEO CTP Non-Exempt-December 25, 2022 (4.15(a)--Amendment to Salary Schedules for RIEO CTP) 329 Wastewater Laboratory Technician Grade II $26.42 $27.74 $29.13 $30.59 $32.12 $33.72 347 Development Services Technician III $26.61 $27.94 $29.34 $30.80 $32.34 $33.96 356 Computer Support Specialist II $26.78 $28.12 $29.53 $31.01 $32.56 $34.18 518 Wastewater Laboratory Technician Grade III $27.08 $28.43 $29.85 $31.35 $32.91 $34.56 320 Computer/Network Technician II $27.41 $28.78 $30.22 $31.73 $33.32 $34.98 355 Housing Specialist I $28.19 $29.60 $31.08 $32.64 $34.27 $35.98 394 Records Specialist II $28.38 $29.80 $31.29 $32.86 $34.50 $36.22 334 Engineering Technician II $28.52 $29.95 $31.45 $33.02 $34.67 $36.40 331 Computer Support Specialist III $28.72 $30.16 $31.67 $33.25 $34.91 $36.66 573 Senior Wastewater Laboratory Technician $28.99 $30.44 $31.96 $33.56 $35.24 $37.00 321 Public Works Inspector $29.60 $31.08 $32.64 $34.27 $35.98 $37.78 534 Senior Wastewater Laboratory Technician Grade IV $29.72 $31.20 $32.76 $34.40 $36.12 $37.93 577 Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade II $30.42 $31.94 $33.53 $35.21 $36.97 $38.82 319 Building Inspector $30.51 $32.04 $33.64 $35.32 $37.09 $38.94 324 Neighborhood Preservation Officer $30.51 $32.04 $33.64 $35.32 $37.09 $38.94 323 Housing Specialist II $30.59 $32.12 $33.72 $35.41 $37.18 $39.04 579 Water Plant Operator - T-3 (D-2) $30.84 $32.38 $34.00 $35.70 $37.49 $39.36 567 Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade III $31.18 $32.74 $34.37 $36.09 $37.89 $39.79 328 GIS Analyst I $31.59 $33.17 $34.83 $36.57 $38.39 $40.31 571 Water Plant Operator - T-4 (D-3) $31.61 $33.19 $34.85 $36.60 $38.43 $40.35 569 Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade IV $31.96 $33.55 $35.23 $36.99 $38.84 $40.78 575 Water Plant Operator - T-5 (D-4) $32.40 $34.02 $35.72 $37.51 $39.39 $41.36 317 Computer/Network Technician III $32.62 $34.25 $35.96 $37.76 $39.65 $41.63 572 Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade V $32.75 $34.39 $36.11 $37.92 $39.81 $41.80 330 GIS Analyst II $34.83 $36.57 $38.40 $40.31 $42.33 $44.45 552 Senior Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade III $35.74 $37.53 $39.41 $41.38 $43.44 $45.62 553 Senior Water Plant Operator - T-4 (D-3) $36.10 $37.91 $39.80 $41.79 $43.88 $46.08 576 Senior Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade IV $36.64 $38.47 $40.39 $42.41 $44.53 $46.76 592 Senior Water Plant Operator - T-5 (D-4) $37.01 $38.86 $40.80 $42.84 $44.98 $47.23 520 Working Supervisor-Wastewater Plant - Grade III $45.60 $47.88 589 Senior Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade V $37.55 $39.43 $41.40 $43.47 $45.64 $47.93 525 Working Supervisor - Water Plant - T-4/T-5 (D-3/D-4) $46.06 $48.36 593 Working Supervisor-Wastewater Plant - Grade IV $46.74 $49.07 595 Working Supervisor - Water Plant - T-5 (D-4) $47.21 $49.57 594 Working Supervisor-Wastewater Plant - Grade V $47.90 $50.30 Note: Pay rates are calculated utilizing a standardized formula and small differences may occur due to rounding.

Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: RIEO CTP Non-Exempt-December 25, 2022 (4.15(a)--Amendment to Salary Schedules for RIEO CTP) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6
####### ####### ###### ###### #######
930 Student Aid $15.01 $15.76 $16.55 $17.38 $18.25
932 Mail Courier $15.01 $15.76 $16.55 $17.38 $18.25
933 Technical Intern $15.01 $15.76 $16.55 $17.38 $18.25 344 Scale House Attendant I $16.35 $17.17 $18.02 $18.93 $19.87 $20.87 398 Clerk I $16.35 $17.17 $18.02 $18.93 $19.87 $20.87
978 Janitor $16.47 $17.29 $18.15 $19.06 $20.01 $21.01
383 Reprographics Technician I $16.87 $17.71 $18.60 $19.53 $20.50 $21.53 345 Scale House Attendant II $18.09 $18.99 $19.94 $20.94 $21.98 $23.08 397 Clerk II $18.09 $18.99 $19.94 $20.94 $21.98 $23.08
390 Administrative Assistant I $18.74 $19.68 $20.66 $21.69 $22.78 $23.92 393 Account Clerk I $19.70 $20.69 $21.72 $22.81 $23.95 $25.15 384 Reprographics Technician II $19.70 $20.69 $21.72 $22.81 $23.95 $25.15 346 Scale House Attendant III $19.83 $20.82 $21.86 $22.96 $24.11 $25.31 373 Clerk III $19.83 $20.82 $21.86 $22.96 $24.11 $25.31 377 Administrative Assistant II $20.58 $21.61 $22.69 $23.82 $25.02 $26.27 374 Crime Analysis Technician $20.66 $21.69 $22.77 $23.91 $25.11 $26.36 341 Development Services Technician I $21.62 $22.70 $23.84 $25.03 $26.28 $27.60 370 Account Clerk II $21.77 $22.86 $24.00 $25.20 $26.46 $27.79 368 Parking Enforcement Officer $22.17 $23.28 $24.44 $25.66 $26.95 $28.29 969 Graphic Designer I $22.45 $23.57 $24.75 $25.99 $27.29 $28.66 369 Housing Technician $22.57 $23.70 $24.88 $26.13 $27.43 $28.81 359 Police Records Technician I $22.69 $23.82 $25.02 $26.27 $27.58 $28.96 364 Executive Assistant I $22.81 $23.95 $25.15 $26.41 $27.73 $29.11 363 Computer Support Specialist I $23.07 $24.23 $25.44 $26.71 $28.05 $29.45 565 Wastewater Plant Operator-in-Training $27.07 $28.42 $29.84 362 Accounting Specialist $23.43 $24.60 $25.83 $27.12 $28.47 $29.90 385 Reprographics Technician III $23.43 $24.60 $25.83 $27.12 $28.47 $29.90 351 Customer Service Representative $23.44 $24.62 $25.85 $27.14 $28.50 $29.92 357 Engineering Aid $23.65 $24.83 $26.08 $27.38 $28.75 $30.19 566 Water Plant Operator-in-Training $28.11 $29.52 $30.99 968 Graphic Designer II $24.75 $25.99 $27.29 $28.66 $30.09 $31.59 352 Development Services Technician II $24.81 $26.05 $27.36 $28.72 $30.16 $31.67 361 Computer/Network Technician I $24.87 $26.11 $27.42 $28.79 $30.23 $31.74 371 Police Records Technician II $25.02 $26.27 $27.58 $28.96 $30.41 $31.93 360 Executive Assistant II $26.19 $27.50 $28.87 $30.32 $31.83 $33.43 335 Crime Statistician $26.37 $27.69 $29.08 $30.53 $32.06 $33.66 332 Engineering Technician I $26.53 $27.86 $29.25 $30.72 $32.25 $33.86 358 Business License Specialist $27.06 $28.41 $29.83 $31.32 $32.89 $34.53 392 Records Specialist I $27.06 $28.41 $29.83 $31.32 $32.89 $34.53 372 Fire Prevention Specialist $27.24 $28.61 $30.04 $31.54 $33.12 $34.77 329 Wastewater Laboratory Technician Grade II $27.74 $29.13 $30.59 $32.12 $33.72 $35.41 Hourly Wage Rate - Salary Step

REDDING INDEPENDENT EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION

CLERICAL, TECHNICAL AND PROFESSIONAL UNIT
EXHIBIT "A-2"

NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SCHEDULE OF CLASSIFICATIONS AND HOURLY WAGE RATES Effective: July 23, 2023
Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: RIEO CTP Non-Exempt-July 23, 2023 (4.15(a)--Amendment to Salary Schedules for RIEO CTP) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6
347 Development Services Technician III $27.94 $29.34 $30.80 $32.34 $33.96 $35.66 356 Computer Support Specialist II $28.12 $29.53 $31.01 $32.56 $34.18 $35.89 518 Wastewater Laboratory Technician Grade III $28.43 $29.85 $31.35 $32.91 $34.56 $36.29 320 Computer/Network Technician II $28.78 $30.22 $31.73 $33.32 $34.98 $36.73 355 Housing Specialist I $29.60 $31.08 $32.64 $34.27 $35.98 $37.78 394 Records Specialist II $29.80 $31.29 $32.86 $34.50 $36.22 $38.04 334 Engineering Technician II $29.95 $31.45 $33.02 $34.67 $36.40 $38.22 331 Computer Support Specialist III $30.16 $31.67 $33.25 $34.91 $36.66 $38.49 573 Senior Wastewater Laboratory Technician $30.44 $31.96 $33.56 $35.24 $37.00 $38.85 321 Public Works Inspector $31.08 $32.64 $34.27 $35.98 $37.78 $39.67 534 Senior Wastewater Laboratory Technician Grade IV $31.20 $32.76 $34.40 $36.12 $37.93 $39.82 577 Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade II $31.94 $33.53 $35.21 $36.97 $38.82 $40.76 319 Building Inspector $32.04 $33.64 $35.32 $37.09 $38.94 $40.89 324 Neighborhood Preservation Officer $32.04 $33.64 $35.32 $37.09 $38.94 $40.89 323 Housing Specialist II $32.12 $33.72 $35.41 $37.18 $39.04 $40.99 579 Water Plant Operator - T-3 (D-2) $32.38 $34.00 $35.70 $37.49 $39.36 $41.33 567 Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade III $32.74 $34.37 $36.09 $37.89 $39.79 $41.78 328 GIS Analyst I $33.17 $34.83 $36.57 $38.39 $40.31 $42.33 571 Water Plant Operator - T-4 (D-3) $33.19 $34.85 $36.60 $38.43 $40.35 $42.36 569 Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade IV $33.55 $35.23 $36.99 $38.84 $40.78 $42.82 575 Water Plant Operator - T-5 (D-4) $34.02 $35.72 $37.51 $39.39 $41.36 $43.42 317 Computer/Network Technician III $34.25 $35.96 $37.76 $39.65 $41.63 $43.71 572 Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade V $34.39 $36.11 $37.92 $39.81 $41.80 $43.89 330 GIS Analyst II $36.57 $38.40 $40.31 $42.33 $44.45 $46.67 552 Senior Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade III $37.53 $39.41 $41.38 $43.44 $45.62 $47.90 553 Senior Water Plant Operator - T-4 (D-3) $37.91 $39.80 $41.79 $43.88 $46.08 $48.38 576 Senior Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade IV $38.47 $40.39 $42.41 $44.53 $46.76 $49.10 592 Senior Water Plant Operator - T-5 (D-4) $38.86 $40.80 $42.84 $44.98 $47.23 $49.59 520 Working Supervisor-Wastewater Plant - Grade III $47.88 $50.27 589 Senior Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade V $39.43 $41.40 $43.47 $45.64 $47.93 $50.32 525 Working Supervisor - Water Plant - T-4/T-5 (D-3/D-4) $48.36 $50.78 593 Working Supervisor-Wastewater Plant - Grade IV $49.07 $51.53 595 Working Supervisor - Water Plant - T-5 (D-4) $49.57 $52.05 594 Working Supervisor-Wastewater Plant - Grade V $50.30 $52.81 Note: Pay rates are calculated utilizing a standardized formula and small differences may occur due to rounding.

Packet Pg. 590 Attachment: RIEO CTP Non-Exempt-July 23, 2023 (4.15(a)--Amendment to Salary Schedules for RIEO CTP) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6
####### ####### ###### ###### #######
930 Student Aid $15.01 $15.76 $16.55 $17.38 $18.25 $19.16 932 Mail Courier $15.01 $15.76 $16.55 $17.38 $18.25 $19.16 933 Technical Intern $15.01 $15.76 $16.55 $17.38 $18.25 $19.16 344 Scale House Attendant I $17.17 $18.02 $18.93 $19.87 $20.87 $21.91 398 Clerk I $17.17 $18.02 $18.93 $19.87 $20.87 $21.91
978 Janitor $17.29 $18.15 $19.06 $20.01 $21.01 $22.07
383 Reprographics Technician I $17.71 $18.60 $19.53 $20.50 $21.53 $22.61 345 Scale House Attendant II $18.99 $19.94 $20.94 $21.98 $23.08 $24.24 397 Clerk II $18.99 $19.94 $20.94 $21.98 $23.08 $24.24
390 Administrative Assistant I $19.68 $20.66 $21.69 $22.78 $23.92 $25.11 393 Account Clerk I $20.69 $21.72 $22.81 $23.95 $25.15 $26.41 384 Reprographics Technician II $20.69 $21.72 $22.81 $23.95 $25.15 $26.41 346 Scale House Attendant III $20.82 $21.86 $22.96 $24.11 $25.31 $26.58 373 Clerk III $20.82 $21.86 $22.96 $24.11 $25.31 $26.58 377 Administrative Assistant II $21.61 $22.69 $23.82 $25.02 $26.27 $27.58 374 Crime Analysis Technician $21.69 $22.77 $23.91 $25.11 $26.36 $27.68 341 Development Services Technician I $22.70 $23.84 $25.03 $26.28 $27.60 $28.98 370 Account Clerk II $22.86 $24.00 $25.20 $26.46 $27.79 $29.18 368 Parking Enforcement Officer $23.28 $24.44 $25.66 $26.95 $28.29 $29.71 969 Graphic Designer I $23.57 $24.75 $25.99 $27.29 $28.66 $30.09 369 Housing Technician $23.70 $24.88 $26.13 $27.43 $28.81 $30.25 359 Police Records Technician I $23.82 $25.02 $26.27 $27.58 $28.96 $30.41 364 Executive Assistant I $23.95 $25.15 $26.41 $27.73 $29.11 $30.57 363 Computer Support Specialist I $24.23 $25.44 $26.71 $28.05 $29.45 $30.92 565 Wastewater Plant Operator-in-Training $28.42 $29.84 $31.33 362 Accounting Specialist $24.60 $25.83 $27.12 $28.47 $29.90 $31.39 385 Reprographics Technician III $24.60 $25.83 $27.12 $28.47 $29.90 $31.39 351 Customer Service Representative $24.62 $25.85 $27.14 $28.50 $29.92 $31.42 357 Engineering Aid $24.83 $26.08 $27.38 $28.75 $30.19 $31.69 566 Water Plant Operator-in-Training $29.52 $30.99 $32.54 968 Graphic Designer II $25.99 $27.29 $28.66 $30.09 $31.59 $33.17 352 Development Services Technician II $26.05 $27.36 $28.72 $30.16 $31.67 $33.25 361 Computer/Network Technician I $26.11 $27.42 $28.79 $30.23 $31.74 $33.33 371 Police Records Technician II $26.27 $27.58 $28.96 $30.41 $31.93 $33.53 360 Executive Assistant II $27.50 $28.87 $30.32 $31.83 $33.43 $35.10 335 Crime Statistician $27.69 $29.08 $30.53 $32.06 $33.66 $35.34 332 Engineering Technician I $27.86 $29.25 $30.72 $32.25 $33.86 $35.56 358 Business License Specialist $28.41 $29.83 $31.32 $32.89 $34.53 $36.26 392 Records Specialist I $28.41 $29.83 $31.32 $32.89 $34.53 $36.26 372 Fire Prevention Specialist $28.61 $30.04 $31.54 $33.12 $34.77 $36.51 329 Wastewater Laboratory Technician Grade II $29.13 $30.59 $32.12 $33.72 $35.41 $37.18 Hourly Wage Rate - Salary Step

REDDING INDEPENDENT EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION

CLERICAL, TECHNICAL AND PROFESSIONAL UNIT
EXHIBIT "A-3"

NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SCHEDULE OF CLASSIFICATIONS AND HOURLY WAGE RATES Effective: July 21, 2024
Packet Pg. 591 Attachment: RIEO CTP Non-Exempt-July 21, 2024 (4.15(a)--Amendment to Salary Schedules for RIEO CTP) Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6
347 Development Services Technician III $29.34 $30.80 $32.34 $33.96 $35.66 $37.44 356 Computer Support Specialist II $29.53 $31.01 $32.56 $34.18 $35.89 $37.69 518 Wastewater Laboratory Technician Grade III $29.85 $31.35 $32.91 $34.56 $36.29 $38.10 320 Computer/Network Technician II $30.22 $31.73 $33.32 $34.98 $36.73 $38.57 355 Housing Specialist I $31.08 $32.64 $34.27 $35.98 $37.78 $39.67 394 Records Specialist II $31.29 $32.86 $34.50 $36.22 $38.04 $39.94 334 Engineering Technician II $31.45 $33.02 $34.67 $36.40 $38.22 $40.13 331 Computer Support Specialist III $31.67 $33.25 $34.91 $36.66 $38.49 $40.42 573 Senior Wastewater Laboratory Technician $31.96 $33.56 $35.24 $37.00 $38.85 $40.79 321 Public Works Inspector $32.64 $34.27 $35.98 $37.78 $39.67 $41.66 534 Senior Wastewater Laboratory Technician Grade IV $32.76 $34.40 $36.12 $37.93 $39.82 $41.81 577 Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade II $33.53 $35.21 $36.97 $38.82 $40.76 $42.80 319 Building Inspector $33.64 $35.32 $37.09 $38.94 $40.89 $42.93 324 Neighborhood Preservation Officer $33.64 $35.32 $37.09 $38.94 $40.89 $42.93 323 Housing Specialist II $33.72 $35.41 $37.18 $39.04 $40.99 $43.04 579 Water Plant Operator - T-3 (D-2) $34.00 $35.70 $37.49 $39.36 $41.33 $43.40 567 Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade III $34.37 $36.09 $37.89 $39.79 $41.78 $43.87 328 GIS Analyst I $34.83 $36.57 $38.39 $40.31 $42.33 $44.45 571 Water Plant Operator - T-4 (D-3) $34.85 $36.60 $38.43 $40.35 $42.36 $44.48 569 Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade IV $35.23 $36.99 $38.84 $40.78 $42.82 $44.96 575 Water Plant Operator - T-5 (D-4) $35.72 $37.51 $39.39 $41.36 $43.42 $45.59 317 Computer/Network Technician III $35.96 $37.76 $39.65 $41.63 $43.71 $45.90 572 Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade V $36.11 $37.92 $39.81 $41.80 $43.89 $46.09 330 GIS Analyst II $38.40 $40.31 $42.33 $44.45 $46.67 $49.00 552 Senior Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade III $39.41 $41.38 $43.44 $45.62 $47.90 $50.29 553 Senior Water Plant Operator - T-4 (D-3) $39.80 $41.79 $43.88 $46.08 $48.38 $50.80 576 Senior Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade IV $40.39 $42.41 $44.53 $46.76 $49.10 $51.55 592 Senior Water Plant Operator - T-5 (D-4) $40.80 $42.84 $44.98 $47.23 $49.59 $52.07 520 Working Supervisor-Wastewater Plant - Grade III $50.27 $52.78 589 Senior Wastewater Plant Operator - Grade V $41.40 $43.47 $45.64 $47.93 $50.32 $52.84 525 Working Supervisor - Water Plant - T-4/T-5 (D-3/D-4) $50.78 $53.32 593 Working Supervisor-Wastewater Plant - Grade IV $51.53 $54.10 595 Working Supervisor - Water Plant - T-5 (D-4) $52.05 $54.65 594 Working Supervisor-Wastewater Plant - Grade V $52.81 $55.46 Note: Pay rates are calculated utilizing a standardized formula and small differences may occur due to rounding.

Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: RIEO CTP Non-Exempt-July 21, 2024 (4.15(a)--Amendment to Salary Schedules for RIEO CTP)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the Mayor’s recommendation to reappoint Philip Cramer to the Shasta Mosquito Abatement and Vector Control District Board to serve a second two-year term beginning January 1, 2023, and ending December 31, 2024.

Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the Mayor’s recommendation.

Background/Analysis
Board Member Philip Cramer has served one full term and is eligible for reappointment. Mr.

Cramer has expressed interest in serving another term on the Shasta Mosquito Abatement and Vector Control District Board. If approved, his term will begin January 1, 2023, and end December 31, 2024.

Environmental Review
Appointment to the Shasta County Mosquito Abatement & Vector Control District Board does not represent a project and no determination under the California Environmental Quality Act is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
ITEM NO. 5.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 5.1--Consider reappointment to the Shasta Mosquito Abatement and Vector Control District.

Michael Dacquisto, Mayor
Packet Pg. 593

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to the Fee-to-Trust Application pertaining to 228.64 acres of land owned by the Redding Rancheria immediately south of the southern terminus of Bechelli Lane, east of Interstate 5 submitted by the Redding Rancheria to Bureau of Indian Affairs:
(1) Accept report;
(2) Establish a position on the Fee-to-Trust Application; and (3) Provide direction to staff related to a written response to the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with providing written correspondence to the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA).

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not accept the report nor establish a position relative to the Fee-to-Trust Application, and provide direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The City of Redding (City) received a letter from the BIA on November 4, 2022, providing notice that Redding Rancheria (Rancheria) filed an application to have real property accepted “into trust.” The property in question is 228.64 acres of land owned by the Rancheria immediately south of the southern terminus of Bechelli Lane, east of Interstate 5 and more commonly known as the Strawberry Fields Property. The letter required a response by December 5, 2022, but there was an allowance for an extension. The City applied for the extension and was granted until January 4, 2023, to respond. The BIA request was for general comment as well as comment on four specific topics as listed below:

MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
ITEM NO. 9.1(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(a)--Consider submission of letter to the Bureau of Indian Affairs regarding Fee-to-Trust Application submitted by Redding Rancheria.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 594
Report to Redding City Council December 13, 2022
Re: 9.1(a)--Letter to Bureau of Indian Affairs Regarding Fee toTrust Application Page 2 1) If known, the annual amount of property taxes currently levied on the subject property allocated to your organization;
2) Any special assessments, and amounts thereof, that are currently assessed against the property in support of your organization;
3) Any government services that are currently provided to the property by your organization; and
4) If subject to zoning, how the intended use is consistent, or inconsistent, with current zoning.

The City receives no taxes or assessments from these properties nor does the City provide any services to these properties. The property is located in the County of Shasta, is not in the City’s Sphere of Influence, and therefore not subject to any City Zoning Regulations.

On August 5, 2019, the City Council unanimously approved sending a letter to the BIA opposing the proposed Fee-to-Trust process that was being pursued by the Rancheria. The motion approved is stated below:

A MOTION WAS MADE by Mayor Winter, and seconded by Council Member Resner, to nominate two Council Members to work with staff to draft a formal letter outlining the City Council’s concerns regarding the Casino Project, to send the letter to the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Redding Rancheria, and to return to a future Council meeting for approval of the draft letter.

The letter was approved for submittal by the Council on August 20, 2019, as noted in the motion below:

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Resner, seconded by Council Member Dacquisto, to authorize the Mayor to sign the letter regarding the Redding Rancheria’s proposed casino project to be located south of Redding and to send the letter to the Department of the Interior, the Bureau of Indian Affairs, and the Redding Rancheria. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

The submitted letter was signed by then-Mayor Winter and sent to the BIA on August 20, 2019.

The Council may wish to use this letter (attached) as the basis for any new letter sent to the BIA or may wish to craft a different letter with a different position. The determination of this is the purpose of this item.

Environmental Review
Submittal of a letter to the BIA does not represent a project and no determination under the California Environmental Quality Act is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Attachments
^Letter to BIA 8-23-19 re - Proposed Casino Redding Rancheria ^BIA Notice of Fee-In-Trust Application by Redding Rancheria Packet Pg. 595
Packet Pg. 596
Attachment: ^Letter to BIA 8-23-19 re - Proposed Casino Redding Rancheria (9.1(a)--Letter to Bureau of Indian Affairs Regarding Fee toTrust Packet Pg. 597
Attachment: ^Letter to BIA 8-23-19 re - Proposed Casino Redding Rancheria (9.1(a)--Letter to Bureau of Indian Affairs Regarding Fee toTrust Packet Pg. 598
Attachment: ^BIA Notice of Fee-In-Trust Application by Redding Rancheria (9.1(a)--Letter to Bureau of Indian Affairs Regarding Fee toTrust Packet Pg. 599
Attachment: ^BIA Notice of Fee-In-Trust Application by Redding Rancheria (9.1(a)--Letter to Bureau of Indian Affairs Regarding Fee toTrust Packet Pg. 600
Attachment: ^BIA Notice of Fee-In-Trust Application by Redding Rancheria (9.1(a)--Letter to Bureau of Indian Affairs Regarding Fee toTrust Packet Pg. 601
Attachment: ^BIA Notice of Fee-In-Trust Application by Redding Rancheria (9.1(a)--Letter to Bureau of Indian Affairs Regarding Fee toTrust Packet Pg. 602
Attachment: ^BIA Notice of Fee-In-Trust Application by Redding Rancheria (9.1(a)--Letter to Bureau of Indian Affairs Regarding Fee toTrust

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the following actions relative to the City of Redding’s leased property located at 3211 Mark Street (Assessor’s Parcel No. 108-360-026) (Property) and the Mark Street Emergency Housing Site (EHS):
(1) Approve United Way of Northern California’s (United Way) South Market Micro-Shelter Community Operations and Services Manual (Manual) and Site Plan; (2) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a Consulting and Professional Services Contract with United Way for the operations of the Mark Street EHS that includes eight, single-occupancy sleeping cabins provided at the property, in a total amount not to exceed $150,000;
(3) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate with United Way a one-year sublease, with a one-year renewal option, and authorize the Mayor to sign the sublease; (4) Authorize the City Manager to issue an EHS permit to United Way for the Mark Street EHS that includes up to eight, single-occupancy sleeping cabins and to set the one-year term start date;
(5) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and execute a County of Shasta (County) American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funded agreement for $300,000 and appropriate $150,000 of County ARPA funds to United Way for the operations of the Mark Street EHS; and
(6) Based on the facts in the record, make the finding that the subject permit is categorically exempt under California Environmental Quality Act Guideline Section 15061(b)(3) and 15304, Class 4 Minor Alterations to Land and that the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review shows that the project is categorically excluded subject to 58.5 but converted to exempt status.

Fiscal Impact
To date, the Housing Division has expended $101,318 to purchase eight pallet shelters and install infrastructure including security fencing, electricity, water meter, backflow device, water hose MEETING DATE: December 20, 2022
ITEM NO. 9.2(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(d)--Consider approval of the Mark Street Emergency Housing Site and the Consulting and Professional Services Agreement with United Way to operate the site.

Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 603
Report to Redding City Council December 14, 2022
Re: 9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site Page 2
bibs, road improvement, and removal of organics to prepare the property to host an EHS. The Housing Division utilized Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) and Low- and Moderate-Income Housing Asset Funds (LMIHAF) to pay for the costs.

United Way is confident that the first-year operation of the EHS should not exceed $400,000, and will be providing $250,000 toward the cost. To support United Way’s efforts, the Housing Division proposes to allocate grant funding in the amount of $150,000 from either County ARPA, CDBG, LMIHAF, Permanent Local Housing Allocation, Emergency Solutions Grant, or other qualifying Housing Division funding resources that may be available. There is no impact to the City of Redding’s (City) General Fund.

On May 31, 2022, the Shasta County Board of Supervisors approved an allocation of ARPA funds for micro-shelter community supportive services in the amount of $300,000. Shasta County Health and Human Services agency has verbally agreed, and is presently completing an agreement to subgrant these funds to the City.

Housing Division staff will assist with coordinating and monitoring the Mark Street EHS; the costs associated are included in the Housing Division’s budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to modify the EHS proposal and provide alternate direction to staff, or may choose not to approve the EHS altogether and staff would continue to work with other community partners to facilitate an EHS in another location.

Background/Analysis
In June 2021, the Council adopted a resolution that declared a shelter crisis within the City and subsequently approved Ordinance Nos. 2637 and 2638, along with the associated Administrative Guidelines that collectively set forth the requirements and process for the City to review and authorize, through a permit approved by the Council, the establishment and operation of EHSs.

An EHS provides emergency, temporary housing to not more than 30 individuals occupying emergency sleeping cabins as defined in Appendix O of the California Building Code. Each EHS must adhere to the Administrative Guidelines and develop and post Good Neighbor Policies addressing the EHS premises and the immediate surrounding neighborhood. These policies must clearly show how the EHS actively discourages and addresses excessive noise or loitering from EHS participants and others who may be near the site. Where applicable, the EHS must demonstrate coordination with other service providers and community partners to address the above issues and the impacts of each. To comply with these requirements, each EHS must submit an operations plan that conforms to the Administrative Guidelines to the City Manager’s Office for initial review and approval as part of the permit issuance process.

The Redding Area Bus Authority (RABA) owns the subject property located at 3211 Mark Street, which is adjacent to the main RABA facility. On September 19, 2022, RABA entered into a two-year lease with the City for the purpose of providing a potential EHS.

United Way expressed a desire to operate an EHS at the Mark Street site. As proposed, the Mark Street location will contain eight, single-occupancy, temporary sleeping cabins and the associated supplemental structures that are discussed further in this staff report. Pursuant to the Packet Pg. 604
Report to Redding City Council December 14, 2022
Re: 9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site Page 3
Administrative Guidelines, on September 27, 2022, written notifications were sent to all property owners within a 600-foot radius of the EHS. As a follow-up to the notification letters, an informational meeting was held October 7, 2022, with representatives from the adjacent residential complex, The Woodlands, and Juniper School.

In November 2022, United Way submitted its Mark Street Manual to the City Manager’s Office for review and approval. Pursuant to the City’s Administrative Guidelines for EHSs, the Manual contains the required health and safety provisions, EHS site standards, operations/administrative guidelines, program criteria, and the facility requirements. Facility requirements include admission requirements, security, participant responsibilities and rights, and programmatic parameters such as hours of operation, curfew, good neighbor policies, and facility standards. On November 11, 2022, the City Manager’s Office approved the Manual conditioned upon the Council’s approval.

Ordinance No. 2637 states that an EHS must be situated more than 500 feet from a child care center, school, formal park, or museum and shall be situated not less than one-half mile from any other EHS. Considering these criteria, the EHS is a qualifying location.

As proposed, the EHS will be located on the northern portion of the property with site plan amenities that include:
• Eight emergency sleeping cabins that consist of single-occupancy units. The sleeping cabins have been approved by the City’s Building Official. • Common site items include: compacted all-weather gravel road; accessible path of travel; lighting; common gathering area; portable restrooms; outdoor storage units; and screened fencing.

If the EHS is approved by the Council, site improvements will likely be completed in January 2023 with operations forecasted to begin shortly thereafter. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 2637, the term of any EHS is limited to one-year and may be considered for renewal by notifying the City Manager in writing 90-days prior to the one-year term expiration. The one-year term will be based on the first day of operation as deemed by the City Manager.

The EHS will be operated by a program manager, local service providers, and volunteers.

Operational services include: a site coordinator that will be on-site or on-call 24 hours a day and seven days a week; referral services; housing case management; workshop with learning opportunities; and health and wellness information. Operational and capital costs for the EHS are estimated to be approximately $400,000 per year.

Participants of the EHS are subject to rules, rights, responsibilities, Good Neighbor Policies, and will sign a Resident Community Agreement. The goal is to provide participants a safe place to address the issues that led to their homelessness. Each participant is limited to a maximum stay of 10 months.

The crisis of unsheltered homelessness in Redding is one that impacts the entire community, including those experiencing homelessness and the broader community of housed residents, businesses, and neighborhoods. The EHS program is an opportunity to assist the unsheltered by providing a safe place to live so they may build stability and self-sufficiency while bridging from an unsheltered lifestyle to permanent housing.

Packet Pg. 605
Report to Redding City Council December 14, 2022
Re: 9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site Page 4
Environmental Review
The property area associated with the EHS permit is a vacant and undeveloped property. The proposed improvements to the permitted area will not include tree removal or permanent alterations, the area is not a wetland, and the landscape improvements are minimal to enhance the site. Lighting will be pedestrian lighting designed to not negatively affect neighbors and traffic will be light due to the tenants not having vehicles. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, there is no substantial evidence that the proposed permit could have a significant effect on the environment and it will not cause a substantial or adverse physical change in the environment; therefore, no further action is required under CEQA 15061(b)(3) and, independently, the project is categorically exempt from CEQA under Section 15304, Class 4 Minor Alterations to Land. The NEPA review concludes that the project is categorically excluded, subject to 58.5 and converted to exempt status.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
^Location Map
COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines
Ordinance No. 2637
Ordinance No. 2638
Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual
Consulting and Professional Services Contract_draft
Property Sublease_draft
Packet Pg. 606
Packet Pg. 607 Attachment: ^Location Map (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding
Administrative Guidelines:

Emergency Housing Sites
Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 4 GENERAL............................................................................................................................................................... 5 EMERGENCY HOUSING SITE STANDARDS................................................................................................. 6 OPERATIONS/ADMINISTRATIVE................................................................................................................... 7 Admission........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Denial of Admission........................................................................................................................................ 7 Participant Emergency Information................................................................................................................. 7 Intake ............................................................................................................................................................... 8 Database Management System........................................................................................................................ 8 Security............................................................................................................................................................ 8 Participation in Religious Activities................................................................................................................ 8 Participant Responsibilities ............................................................................................................................. 8 Participant Rights............................................................................................................................................. 9 Confidentiality ................................................................................................................................................. 9 Non-Discrimination/Reasonable Accommodations......................................................................................... 9 Transgender Access......................................................................................................................................... 9 Participants’ Mail............................................................................................................................................. 9 Storage of Belongings.................................................................................................................................... 10 Medication..................................................................................................................................................... 10 Universal Precautions.................................................................................................................................... 10 First Aid......................................................................................................................................................... 10 Weapons ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 Smoking......................................................................................................................................................... 11 Accessibility .................................................................................................................................................. 11 Emergency Response..................................................................................................................................... 11 Infectious Disease.......................................................................................................................................... 11 Abuse Reporting ............................................................................................................................................ 12 Drug and Alcohol Use/Possession................................................................................................................. 12 Search of Possessions.................................................................................................................................... 12 Storage of Belongings After Discharge......................................................................................................... 13 Discharge Reasons......................................................................................................................................... 13 Discharge Requirements................................................................................................................................ 13 Grievance Process.......................................................................................................................................... 14 PROGRAM .......................................................................................................................................................... 15 Hours ............................................................................................................................................................. 15 Curfew ........................................................................................................................................................... 15 Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 3 Input............................................................................................................................................................... 15 Animal Care................................................................................................................................................... 15 Staff Requirements ........................................................................................................................................ 16 Food Storage/Service..................................................................................................................................... 16 Support Services............................................................................................................................................ 17 FACILITY............................................................................................................................................................. 19 Basic Building Standards and Fire Safety ..................................................................................................... 19 Safety Standards............................................................................................................................................ 19 Amenities....................................................................................................................................................... 19 Drinking Water.............................................................................................................................................. 19 Outlet Access................................................................................................................................................. 19 Cleanliness..................................................................................................................................................... 20 Pest Control ................................................................................................................................................... 20 Maintenance/Repair....................................................................................................................................... 20 Phone Access................................................................................................................................................. 20 Hazardous Materials...................................................................................................................................... 20 Entrance/Exits................................................................................................................................................ 20 Agency Vehicle ............................................................................................................................................. 21 Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 4 INTRODUCTION
The City of Redding Administrative Guidelines for Emergency Housing Sites (hereafter “EHS”) are intended to help guide the delivery of EHS services and the development of the operations plan as required by the City of Redding Ordinance.

Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 5 GENERAL

1. The health and safety of participants, volunteers and staff should be safeguarded within each EHS.

2. Each EHS shall create equal opportunities for all persons needing emergency housing services by prohibiting discrimination due to religious affiliation, race, color, national origin, ancestry, political or religious beliefs, language, disability, family composition, gender identity and/or sexual orientation.

3. The EHS will provide an atmosphere of dignity and respect for all EHS participants.

4. Participants must participate toward increasing levels of self-reliance and self- determination.

EHS staff will work with participants to assist them in achieving their goals.

5. EHS staff often have access to detailed and highly sensitive personal information about participants. Protecting the privacy and confidentiality of EHS participants and their personal information is required.

6. People who are experiencing homelessness may use substances to varying degrees. Everyone is entitled to EHS’s services whether or not they are a substance user. As a result, these standards require that admission, discharge and service restriction policies must not be based on substance use alone, unless otherwise specifically provided for in these guidelines.

7. In order to provide effective EHS programs and services, EHS participants must be offered opportunities to provide input and feedback in service provision and program planning for the program in which they participate.

8. EHS exits to stable housing through supportive services will occur within 10 months. Barriers to engagement will be considered to help assist those to find stable housing with supportive services, if possible.

9. Equal opportunity and standardized procedures will be utilized when determining eligibility, admissions, sanctions and dismissals, and resolving grievances.

10. All program participants are entitled to enjoy the maximum amount of privacy within the constrictions of the EHS environment.

11. EHS are part of a larger network of homeless services and agencies. Collaboration within this network is important to ensure effective and coordinated services.

12. All participants will be briefed and must sign an agreement to uphold the rules and guidelines for the Emergency Housing Site community. Criteria for unacceptable behavior on-site includes but is not limited to; persistent disruptive behavior, theft, use of alcohol, illegal drugs and paraphernalia or violence to yourself or others.

Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 6 EMERGENCY HOUSING SITE STANDARDS
Minimal requirements for entry are placed on EHS participants. The EHS’s primary role is to provide basic life sustaining services in a manner that fosters a safe and affirming atmosphere for all program participants. Participants of local EHS may come from a variety of backgrounds and each has different needs for services. This could include, but is not limited to, those with pets, large amounts of personal belongings, identifying as part of a multi-member household or self‐identify as LGBTQ, or non-binary.

For the purposes of these Guidelines, an Emergency Housing Site is a site which provides short-term, emergency-temporary housing to not more than 30 individuals using Emergency Sleeping Cabins (as defined in Appendix O of the California Building Code) and are duly approved by the City Council.

Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 7 OPERATIONS/ADMINISTRATIVE
EHS must develop and post Good Neighbor Policies addressing the EHS premises and the immediate surrounding neighborhood. These policies must clearly show provisions for how the EHS actively discourages and addresses excessive noise or loitering from EHS participants and others who may be near the site. Where applicable, the EHS must demonstrate coordination with other service providers and community partners to address the above issues and their impacts. The Good Neighbor Policies will be submitted to the City for review and approval as part of the permit issuance process.

EHS must provide written notification to all property owners within a 600 foot radius of the proposed site.

Admission
All EHS must have clearly written and consistently implemented referral standards, admission policies, and hours for new participant admission. All EHS must accept new participant admissions (when EHS is open, and beds are available) Monday through Friday for at least a four-hour period daily. When feasible, admissions should be accepted on weekends. Regular hours for participant intake and discharge must be posted at all entry points.

Denial of Admission
Denial of admission to the facility can be based on the following and is at the discretion of the EHS:
• Applicant does not meet the basic eligibility criteria for EHS admission (e.g. gender, age, homeless status, domestic violence victim, etc.). EHS with beds designated by funding sources as having additional restrictions (e.g. VA beds that require advance approval by the VA) may deny entry to those not meeting funding agency requirements. • A restraining order that prohibits admission to the facility. • Documented violent or threatening behavior
• Conduct from prior stay at the EHS which puts the health and safety of staff or participants at risk (e.g. violence, weapons violations, disclosing confidential information of EHS or participants, and egregious damage to property). If an applicant is denied entrance based on a prior stay, the applicant must be informed of the reason, conditions for lifting the restriction and the right to appeal, including name of contact regarding an appeal and information about the appeal process.
• The applicant requires care and supervision to manage the activities of daily living (feeding, toileting, selecting proper attire, grooming, maintaining continence, putting on clothes, bathing, walking and transferring) without the appropriate support available on-site.

Participant Emergency Information
EHS staff must collect emergency contact information and information about health needs upon admission that may impact an emergency response. Such information should be kept in a place accessible to on-duty staff in the event of an emergency.

Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 8 Intake
Upon admission, participants must be provided with copies of the following documentation:
• Participant rights and responsibilities
• Program rules
• Storage policy, including storage after discharge
• Medication storage policy
• Grievance Procedure
• Listing of available resources to help occupant exit to stable housing Database Management System
Upon 48 hours of entry into the program, data on all participants will be entered in the Homeless Management and Information System (HMIS), pursuant to the data standards required.

Participant files will be maintained in accordance with the requirements of (HMIS) operated by the NorCal Continuum of Care (NorCal COC). For complete information on HMIS Data Standards, contact the NorCal COC at 1450 Court Street, Suite 108, Redding, CA 96001, (530)225-5160.

Security
Security measures shall be identified to safeguard the participants, operators, staff and the surrounding community. These measures may include security personnel, lighting, common area video cameras, line of sight, and other elements, as necessary, to maintain a safe facility.

Participation in Religious Activities
EHS cannot require participation in religious activities as a condition of receiving emergency housing or services. Religious activities include moments of prayer, the saying of grace before meals, or spiritual studies. While these activities are not prohibited, participation in such activities may not be required.

Participant Responsibilities
Participants are required to participate in the operations and management of their site.

Participant Responsibilities must be provided to each participant in writing and signed by the participant upon admission and posted in the facility in a highly visible location. Participant Responsibilities must include:
• A clear description of all program rules and potential consequences for violations of these rules.
• A “Participant Agreement” policy which outlines expected behavior in order not to interfere with the rights of other participants.
• Expectations regarding efforts being made to exit the EHS into stable housing as quickly as possible.

Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 9 Participant Rights
Participant Rights must be provided in writing and posted in the facility in high visibility areas. All program requirements must be consistent with these standards. Rights must include:
• Participants have the right to be treated with dignity and respect; • Participants have the right to privacy within the constrictions of the EHS environment; • Participants have the right to be treated with cultural sensitivity; • Participants have the right to self-determination in identifying and setting goals; • Services should be provided to participants only in the context of a professional relationship based on valid, informed consent;
• Participants should be clearly informed, in understandable language, about the purpose of the services being delivered, including participants who are not literate and/or have limitedEnglish proficiency; • Participants have the right to confidentiality and have information about when confidential information will be disclosed, to whom and for what purpose, as well as the right to deny disclosure, unless disclosure is required by law;
• Participants have the right to reasonable access to records concerning their involvement in the program.

Confidentiality
All EHS must have confidentiality policies which, at minimum, are consistent with Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) privacy and security requirements, make certain that files are kept in a secure or locked location, and ensure that verbal communication of confidential information is done in such a way that avoids unintended disclosure.

Non-Discrimination/Reasonable Accommodations
All EHS must have policies on non-discrimination and reasonable accommodation and make reasonable modifications in programs, activities and services when necessary to ensure equal access to individuals with disabilities, unless fundamental alteration in the nature of the program would result from the accommodation.

Transgender Access
All EHS must comply with the HUD Rule on Appropriate Placement for Transgender Persons in Single-Sex Emergency Housing Sites and Other Facilities. See link: Transgender Placements.

Participants’ Mail
If an EHS provides mail service, any mail sent or received cannot be interfered with (e.g. staff opening participants’ mail, not providing mail to the Participant as soon as practical, etc.).

Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 10 Storage of Belongings
All EHS must have a written policy that is provided upon intake as to what provision is made for securing belongings including what possessions can be held by the program at Participant request such as money, medications, and vital documents.

If an EHS holds funds or possessions on behalf of participants, this service must be voluntary, the program must maintain a log of items in their possession, and the funds or possessions must be returned within operational hours upon the Participant’s request. Each EHS decides how specifically to make their log, with consideration to their liability. It is expected that the log would track only those belongings that participants choose to store with the program and not all possessions brought into the EHS. This does not apply to belongings abandoned by a person who does not return to the EHS; in that situation, please refer to Storage of Belongings After Discharge.

In order to maintain a community free of clutter, each participant is responsible for maintaining a tidy unit. EHS must provide lockable lockers, storage trunks or make other accommodations which allow participantsto securely store their belongings. Reasonable access by the participantsto their belongings must be provided. Waivers of the requirement that storage space be lockable can be requested if the physical layout of the EHS or other barrier does not allow for lockable space.

Medication
EHS may not administer or dispense medication and may not require participants to turn over medication, unless administered by a licensed staff person as part of an on-site supportive program in which an EHS participant is dually enrolled.

If an EHS has provisions for securing prescription medications it must have a written policy that is provided to an occupant upon intake detailing the EHS’s and the occupant’s responsibility to store, secure and use said medication safely. EHS may encourage participants to lock medications in secure storage areas if made available in order to protect medication from theft but may not require participants to turn over medication.

Universal Precautions
Staff must comply with universal precautions, proper sharps disposal and have a written policy in place governing protocols related to universal precautions.

First Aid
Basic first aid supplies must be available on-site and accessible to staff at all times.

Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 11 Weapons
All EHS must have a weapons prohibition policy. Weapons include, but are not limited to, firearms, pepper spray, mace, knives, bats and clubs. EHS should use discretion when determining which types of knives should be prohibited. EHS may, but are not required to, have a mechanism for checking and storing weapons upon entry.

Smoking
EHS shall prohibit smoking indoors and reasonable efforts must be made to prevent smoke from entering buildings. No smoking should be allowed within 20 feet of EHS facilities unless this is infeasible due to layout of grounds. EHS are required to follow any local ordinances regarding smoking in public areas.

Accessibility
EHS and associated facilities must conform to all pertinent requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). See https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap7Shelterchk.htm. Beds designated as accessible must comply with federal height and distance standards requiring a minimum of 36 inches between sleeping units and a sleeping surface height between 17-19 inches above the finished floor. Beds designated as accessible must be prioritized for participants with disabilities. EHS are encouraged to provide as many ADA accessible beds as possible, but it is not required or expected that all beds meet these requirements.

Program documentation must be provided in forms accessible to hearing-impaired and sightimpaired individuals, upon request.

EHS that provide transportation for participants must also make provisions for participants who need vehicles that are wheelchair accessible.

Emergency Response
All EHS must have an emergency response plan in place.

Infectious Disease
EHS are a valuable partner in public health and, as such, are responsible to report any suspicious of infectious disease within the EHS or when suspected or detected among any EHS participants or staff.

An infectious disease which significantly increases the risk or harm to other EHS participants or staff may be a reason for denial or discharge. Participants with lice or scabies or exhibiting symptoms of Tuberculosis (TB) shall be allowed to stay in the EHS unless the disease or infestation cannot be appropriately contained (e.g. due to close quarters of facility), in which case those participants may be discharged and referred to a health care provider for treatment.

Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 12 Abuse Reporting
All EHS must have a policy that details any legal duties to report elder, dependent adult, child or animal abuse and a written plan and process for reporting such abuse to the appropriate reporting agency.

Drug and Alcohol Use/Possession
EHS must have a policy prohibiting the possession, use, or distribution of alcohol or illegal drugs on the premises. If alcohol or drugs are found, participants should be given the opportunity to dispose of the prohibited substance or leave the EHS for that night if they do not wish to dispose of the prohibited substance. A single violation of this policy cannot be a reason for discharge unless the violation compromises the health or safety of other participants or staff. Multiple violations of this policy may be used for grounds for discharge.

Admission, discharge, and service restriction policies must not be based on substance use or possession alone unless as noted above for multiple violations.

Drug testing of participants is prohibited unless the testing is part of an agreed upon treatment plan with the participant. Submission to drug testing cannot be a requirement for residency and refusal to participate in drug testing cannot be the basis for involuntary discharge.

Being under the influence on-site may not be the basis for discharge.

Noncompliance with treatment or containment measures that endangers other participants may be cause for discharge.

EHS must comply with California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 5199, regarding Aerosol Transmissible Diseases (ATD) control and worker and client safety expectations:
http://www.dir.ca.gov/title8/5199.HTML.

For additional guidance on this regulation and for information regarding best practices for control of infectious disease, please also refer to “Preventing Tuberculosis (TB) in Homeless Shelters” published by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health:
http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/tb/docs/LATBGuidelinesforShelters.pdf Search of Possessions
All EHS must have a policy and procedures in place governing how and when searches of participants’ private possessions may be conducted. Searches may only be conducted when there is “probable cause” to believe that the person has in his or her possession something which may jeopardize the safety of other participants or staff, including a weapon, or illegal material, including illegal drugs, or something which is interfering with the peaceful enjoyment of the facility of other participants such as food that is attracting vermin. If the person does not consent to the search, and “probable cause” exists to search, the person may be given the choice of being discharged or being searched.

Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 13 Storage of Belongings After Discharge
EHS must have a written policy for the storage of belongings after a participant exits, which must include, at a minimum, storage of belongings for at least five (5) working days after participants’ exit and a clear process for discharged participantsto reclaim their possessions. A copy of the policy must be provided to all participants at intake.

Discharge Reasons
The following reasons may be used as a basis for discharge from an Emergency Housing Site, and must occur on Emergency Housing Site premises:
• Possession of a weapon at the EHS
• Assault or other violent behavior.
• Theft.
• Destruction of property.
• Restraining order precludes continued residence.
• Participant behavior endangers health or safety of participants or staff. • Presence of infectious disease that significantly increases the risk of harm to other participants or staff.
• Multiple violations of the Drug and Alcohol Use/Possession policy. • Individual requires care and supervision to manage their activities of daily living (feeding, toileting, selecting proper attire, grooming, maintaining continence, putting on clothes, bathing, walking and transferring) without appropriate supports available on- site. Individuals discharged due to care and supervision needs cannot be discharged to the streets. • Refusal of personal property search when probable cause exists.

Participants may be discharged for refusing multiple housing opportunities; however, evidence must be present that EHS staff actively attempted to engage the participant in services designed to support EHS exit to stable housing with consideration given to each participant's barriers to engagement.

EHS are not required to hold beds for longer than 72 hours. If a participant is absent from their bed for 72 hours without appropriate notification to EHS staff regarding absence, the participant may be discharged.

Discharge Requirements
All EHS must provide a written copy of the procedure for filing a grievance to the participant when a participant is involuntary discharged. If it is not feasible to provide the procedure at the time of discharge (e.g. the participant is being removed by law enforcement) this requirement may be waived; however, if the participant subsequently returns to the facility, the grievance procedure must be provided.

A participant may be denied future admission as a result of the circumstances of discharge. The participant must be informed of the reason, the conditions for lifting the restriction and the right Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 14 to appeal, including whom to contact regarding an appeal and information about the appeal process.

Unless the participant poses an immediate threat to the health and safety of other participants and/or staff members, EHS should avoid discharging participants at night and must be approved by a supervisor if doing so. During hours that there is no supervisor on site, there must be a supervisor available “on-call” to approve discharge decisions. Approval may be given verbally but should be documented in case notes.

Grievance Process
All EHS must have a written appeal and complaint policy/protocol that is provided to each participant upon intake and is publicly posted in a location with high visibility to participants. At a minimum, the protocol must include:
• The opportunity for participants to present their case before a neutral decision-maker (a supervisor or manager who was not directly involved in the incident or situation of the grievance)
• Accommodation of third-party advocates in the appeal process. Reasonable efforts must be made to coordinate with a participant’s advocate in order to schedule the appeal. • A requirement that participants be given a written response to their appeal within a reasonable time frame.
• A provision that when a participant files an appeal related to his/her ability to stay in the EHS the occupant may stay in the EHS until the appeal process is completed unless allowing the participant continued residence poses a risk to the health and safety of other participants and/or staff.
• An appeals procedure that allows participants to appeal, at a minimum, decisions related to admissions denials for cause, terminations and disciplinary actions. • Provisions for providing participants with information about any subsequent appeals process available through program policies or any funding agency or their respective regulations.

Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 15 PROGRAM
Hours
All EHS must post hours of operation in highly visible locations and at all entrances. If the EHS is open 24/7, participants must be allowed access to their possessions and to the facility common space at all times. If access to sleeping areas is not available during the day, accommodations should be made to allow access for those participants working irregular hours, those who are ill, etc. Specific accommodations will be defined in the Operations Plan. All EHS must provide facilities available to participants for sleeping for a minimum of eight (8) hours.

The EHS manager shall enforce quiet hours.

Curfew
This policy will be consistently enforced. Missing a curfew cannot be a reason for denial of entry or discharge unless the late arrival compromises the health or safety of other participants or staff, or if the participant’s late arrival repeatedly interferes with the rights of other participants to peaceful enjoyment of the facility.

Input
Programs shall provide participants with on-going opportunities to provide feedback and make suggestions regarding programming and rules. This can be accomplished in a variety of ways including exit interviews, surveys, one-on-one interviews, participant focus groups, inclusion of homeless or formerly homeless members on the agency board of directors or subcommittee, having homeless or formerly homeless people trained and hired as staff, and/or the creation of a Participants’ Advisory Council.

In addition to any other activities, EHS must host “participant optional” meetings once per month and provide at least 24 hours advance notice to participants of the meeting time and location.

Animal Care
Pet owners shall assume the responsibilities for caring for their animals. Water will be available.

Additional provisions may be provided at the site. Some sites may be unsuitable for pets. Pet owners are also responsible for administering all regular medications to their animals, apart from vaccinations.

The EHS reserves the right to refuse admittance to animals that appear too aggressive for the EHS to handle. Regardless of initial presenting temperament, enforcement of EHS rules to reduce the risk of bites and other injuries must be observed and include:
• All animals should be handled only by their respective owners or trained staff members; • All animals on EHS property should be leashed or confined (kenneled/carrier) at all times; • Participants should not handle or touch pets other than their own; and • All incidents involving aggressive animals are documented in writing prior to removal of the pet from the site.

Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 16 Staff Requirements
EHS must have sufficient staff on duty at all times. EHS must make provisions to have on-call staff available.

EHS must have a supervisor/manager available on call to the program at all times for consultation to staff about challenging participant situations and other urgent matters. All EHS should have a consultation policy in place that outlines situations requiring consultation up the chain of command.

Food Storage/Service
Sanitary facilities
All EHS that either prepare and serve meals or provide areas for participantsto prepare and consume their own meals must ensure that all areas used for food storage and preparation are sanitary. Kitchen and dining areas must be kept clean and comply with all relevant health codes.

Donated Food
Programs that serve food prepared off site by regular donors must provide donors with a handout that details the requirements for food preparation. All food donors must read and sign the handout to confirm knowledge of the standards and must provide current contact information.

Programs are discouraged from accepting food that has been prepared off-site by intermittent donors.

Meal schedule
If meals are served, a meal schedule must be posted.

Dietary modifications
If meals are served or food is provided for participants to use to prepare their own meals, EHS must make dietary modifications and/or provide appropriate food options based on participants’ health, religious, and/or cultural practices. As feasible, food provided should promote healthy eating.

Dining facilities
EHS must provide a table and chairs if food is served.

Food allergies
Any snacks and meals provided should be provided with reasonable accommodations made for known allergies, including children, if residing in the EHS. Providers should be asking about food allergies at intake; however, it is the parents’ responsibility to inform the program of children’s food allergies.

Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 17 Support Services
Case Management
Case management and supportive services focus on housing or directly supporting the goal of housing and should reflect the short-term nature of assistance toward housing placement.

Critical components in the provision of case management services include the following:
• Low Barrier practices
• Housing First
• Harm Reduction
• Trauma Informed Care
• Client-centered
• Culturally competent
The following case management services must be available to program participants receiving these services. To ensure the consistent delivery of case management services, operators must incorporate written case management procedures and forms that include the following:
• Referral Procedures: Establish referral and follow-up procedures to confirm participants are connected to services to which they are referred. Documentation of referrals made and referral confirmation must be maintained in participant files. • Health and Wellness referrals: Ensure participants are linked to and assisted in accessing medical health, mental health, and any needed alcohol and drug services. • Mainstream Benefits: Establish procedures for screening participants at program entry and intake for eligibility to mainstream benefits. Assisting participants by coordinating the completion and submission of applications for public benefits and entitlements (e.g., general assistance, SNAP, SSI/SSDI, Veteran benefits) health insurance benefits (e.g., Medi-Cal, Medicare, Covered California, etc.), and other sources of financial assistance.
• Education/life skills.
• Employment Development/Placement Programs: Assessing employment history and goals and assisting participants to engage in services that will prepare the individual to obtain employment in collaboration with participating agencies.

Housing Case Management
Participants must be offered, and are required to participate in, services they need in order to attain and stabilize in permanent housing. Case management must be conducted on a regular basis and the EHS must document content and outcome of case management meetings. Core services will include:
• Development of an individualized service plan based on needs, circumstances and market conditions, focused on helping individuals find and keep permanent housing and linkages to other community based supportive services as needed.

Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 18 • Creating a referral network for other services and coordinating with other services providers and case managers.

Housing Navigation
Housing navigation services must provide ongoing engagement and support in order to facilitate a match to an appropriate permanent housing placement. Housing navigation objectives will include:
• Connecting participants to needed resources;
• Buffering participants from the stress of navigating housing access; and • Supporting participants in managing their own lives within the scope of their resources and abilities.

Core Navigation Services:
• Housing location and counseling services to identify the most appropriate housing placement;
• Establishing relationships with private and public owners and rental agencies willing to provide permanent housing to clients;
• Assisting with housing applications and appeals, and negotiating rental agreements; • Facilitating shared housing opportunities in community-based housing and through master leasing; and
• Assisting with the move-in process, including identifying resources for basic furnishings, accessibility modifications, or other expenses.

Health services access
EHS staff will encourage participants to obtain and maintain health insurance, obtain a primary care provider and access immunization service. This must include publicly posting or otherwise making available information on health-related services.

Recordkeeping
EHS must have written intake and client record keeping procedures and files that include intake interviews and records of services provided.

Assessment
A basic assessment that includes an evaluation of the service needs of the occupant, information about past or current services received and other information necessary to provide services must be conducted or updated for all occupants.

Transportation
Transportation is required to help participant’s access essential services such as, community-based services, medical services and housing searches. Shuttle service, bus passes and car services such as Uber and Lyft may be utilized. Accommodations must be made for disabled persons who are unable to access general means of transportation.

Universal Accessibility to transportation must be made available, such as RABA, the use of bicycles, or forms or transportation.

Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 19 FACILITY
Basic Building Standards and Fire Safety
All facilities must comply with HUD Emergency Solution Grants facility standards (HUD ESG Facility Standards) and local applicable building and fire codes. Evidence of compliance with local codes must be provided.

Facilities must have annual fire inspections conducted by the fire department and conduct regular fire drills. Training must be provided to staff on fire safety.

Safety Standards
EHS must comply with state and local health, environmental and safety standards.

Amenities
• The EHS must have a heating and ventilation system and maintain a comfortable temperature.

Emergency Sleeping Cabins will comply with Appendix O of the California Building Code. • The EHS shall have a housekeeping and maintenance plan to ensure a safe, sanitary, clean and comfortable environment.
• The EHS shall provide each person with access to a single or double occupancy emergency sleeping cabin with a mattress and bedding, (a blanket and pillow), all of which are clean and in good repair.
• The EHS shall have a sufficient supply of functionally clean and reasonably private toilets and hand wash basins, with hot and cold running water and that meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
• The EHS should have a sufficient quantity of functionally clean and reasonably private bathing facilities with hot and cold running water or will provide for access to bathing facilities at least twice per week through contract or other means. All bathing facilities must meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
• The EHS should have laundry facilities available to residents, or access to laundry facilities nearby or transportation to laundry facilities will be provided or nearby. • The EHS shall provide towels, soap, and toilet tissues.

Drinking Water
EHS must provide access to drinking water at all times.

Outlet Access
EHS must provide access to electrical outlets for charging personal devices such as cell phones and medical equipment. Emergency Sleeping Cabins must have outlets as required by California Building Code Appendix O.

Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 20 Cleanliness
Resident Participation - Bath/toilet areas, hallways, and other common use areas must be cleaned daily. EHS must have proper trash receptacles that are emptied regularly.

Both the interior and exterior of the facility must be free of debris, clutter, and unsanitary items and there must be no obvious safety risks.

Pest Control
EHS must ensure adequate provision of pest control services.

EHS must have a protocol in place for the prevention and control of bed bugs. (See https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/bedbugs/ for best practices related to bed-bug prevention). 24-hour notice must be provided to participants of pest control activities unless the type and degree of infestation requires an immediate response (e.g. bed bugs).

Maintenance/Repair
Facilities must be maintained in good repair. The general appearance of the buildings and surrounding grounds must be well maintained and free from litter and offensive visual ques such as overladen shopping carts. There must be a written housekeeping and maintenance plan.

EHS must post the process for reporting maintenance concerns, acknowledge issues reported within two days, and identify the timeframe for addressing the concern. Emergency maintenance items must be immediately addressed.

Phone Access
A telephone (land line or cell phone) must be available to staff for emergencies. Emergency numbers should be posted by the telephone or otherwise made available to on duty staff. Es must take emergency phone messages and messages from service providers for participants in residence.

Hazardous Materials
In accordance with established standards, EHS must label all chemicals and cleaning supplies and keep all such materials out of reach of children. Any hazardous materials must be stored separate from food.

No fires, including cooking or warming fires will be allowed on site at any time.

Entrance/Exits
Exits must be clearly marked and must be kept clear of blockage and tripping hazards.

All steps must have handrails as required by applicable codes. Steps must have treads or similar accommodation to prevent slipping.

Exit signage must be consistent with all applicable codes.

Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) City of Redding Administrative Guidelines Emergency Housing Sites 21 Agency Vehicle
If an EHS location maintains a vehicle used for participant transport, the vehicle must be properly maintained, licensed and insured. All drivers must be properly licensed. Provisions must be made to provide equal access to transportation services to disabled participants.

Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: COR-EHS Administrative Guidelines (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ORDINANCE NO. 2637
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 18
(ZONING), CHAPTER 18.17 (TEMPORARY USE PERMITS), BY
AMENDING SECTION 18.17.020 (TEMPORARY USES EXEMPT FROM

PERMITS), RELATING TO ESTABLISHING THE CRITERIA FOR

PERMITTING EMERGENCY HOUSING SITES AND THE OPERATION

OF THE SAME DURING A DECLARED SHELTER CRISIS
WHEREAS, the 2020 Shasta County Point-in-Time Report purported that four hundred fifty-four (454) individuals within the City of Redding (City), including veterans, women, children, individuals with disabilities, senior citizens, and other vulnerable groups, are experiencing unsheltered homelessness within the City; and
WHEREAS, on September 25, 2020, the Governor signed Assembly Bill 2553 which expanded the Shelter Crisis Law, providing all cities and counties flexibility in addressing the homeless crisis and provide additional shelter options to individuals experiencing homelessness; and WHEREAS, the Shelter Crisis Law permits local jurisdictions to adopt reasonable local standards which, at a minimum, meet the standards provided in the 2019 California Residential Code Appendix X and the California Building Code Appendix O; and WHEREAS, the City Council has received extensive testimony and been provided extensive data on the deleterious impacts of homelessness on individuals who lack shelter and the community at large; and
WHEREAS, unauthorized camps exist throughout the City and many of these camps are unsanitary and thereby have a harmful consequence to the environment; and WHEREAS, occupants of the unauthorized camps are vulnerable to theft, crime, and extreme weather conditions; and
WHEREAS, the aforementioned conditions threaten the physical and mental health of the individuals living in these camps and the safety and well-being of the general public impacted by the nuisance conditions occurring at unauthorized camp locations; and WHEREAS, the City has shelter capacity that is not exhausted by the number of unsheltered individuals in the City, but many unsheltered individuals do not avail themselves of opportunities provided by existing shelter options; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that expanding the type and number of shelter options may encourage the unsheltered to avail themselves of the shelter opportunities provided herein and that such opportunities may serve as a bridge to more permanent shelter; and Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2637 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that strict compliance with state and local standards and laws in existence as of the effective date of this Ordinance would prevent, hinder, or delay the mitigation of the effects of the shelter crisis; and
WHEREAS, it is the purpose of this ordinance is to define requirements and provide a process for the City to review and authorize, through a permit approved by the City Council, the establishment and operation of Emergency Housing Sites and related facilities by a third party as required by the Ordinance and that meet certain health and safety standards; and WHEREAS, adoption of this Ordinance will promote the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare of the City;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The findings set forth above are hereby adopted as findings of fact.

Section 2. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.17 (Temporary Use Permits), Section

18.17.020 is amended to read as follows:

18.17.020 - Temporary uses exempt from permits.

The following temporary uses are allowed without a use permit subject to meeting any applicable standards and limitations established in the Redding Municipal Code, the limitations specified by this section. The following temporary uses are permitted:

A. Charitable Events, Fundraising, and Community Events. Fundraisers and like charitable events, limited to three days each month for each sponsoring organization. Sponsorship shall be limited to religious, educational, fraternal, or service organizations directly engaged in civic or charitable efforts. Such activities shall only occur on nonresidential properties and shall not use more than ten percent of the available site parking.

B. Construction Yards and Offices. On-site contractors' construction yards and offices, including manufactured or mobile units, in conjunction with an approved construction project. Yards and offices shall be removed within ten days of receiving an occupancy permit for the project.

C. Emergency Shelters and Activities. During a declared emergency, temporary emergency shelters or activities shall be permitted in any zoning district provided that the facilities are approved by the City Building Official and Fire Marshal prior to use.

D. Garage and Yard Sales in Residential Zones. Three garage or yard sales in any twelvemonth period, not exceeding three consecutive days each, shall be deemed a use incidental to the residential use of a property. Garage or yard sales in excess of this limit shall be prohibited in all residential zones.

Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2637 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) E. Outside Displays/Seasonal and Other Sales. The temporary outdoor display/sales of merchandise in conjunction with a lawful business on the premises not exceeding four consecutive days or a total of sixteen days in any calendar year. The sales area may not reduce available parking by more than ten percent. A site development permit is required to exceed these standards. Tents are specifically excluded from this exemption.

F. Public Property. Events which are to be conducted on public property with the approval of the city, not exceeding three days in duration, subject to the findings required by Section

8.17.070.

G. Model Home Real Estate Sales Offices. Real estate sales offices within model homes in new residential developments.

H. Seasonal Sales Lots. Seasonal sales of Christmas trees and pumpkins on nonresidential properties, including temporary security trailers for a period not exceeding forty-five days.

I. Similar Temporary Uses. Similar temporary uses which, in the opinion of the director, do not require a use permit and are compatible with the zoning district and surrounding land uses.

J. Mobile Medical. A special purpose commercial coach that provides medical, diagnostic and treatment services that is parked on private property subject to the land use regulations of the city shall comply with the following conditions and requirements:

1. Shall be licensed per the State of California Health and Safety Code.

2. Mobile Medical units shall not be operated from the public right of way and shall be located on a parcel meeting at least one of the following criteria; a. In zoning districts that allow clinics as a permitted use. b. In residential districts, in conjunction with health fairs, pediatric health screenings, school physicals, oral health services, limited to non-residential properties such as churches and schools and limited to twelve days per property per year.
c. As an accessory use to an existing treatment facility, clinic, shelter, or hospital.
d. As a transitional use where a clinic is proposed and under review by the City of Redding.

3. Services shall be limited to licensed and accredited oral health preventative services and primary care and preventative health care programs that have an existing collaboration with a local hospital or licensed medical clinic to meet the necessary Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2637 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) health care referral needs of the community and patient population being served.

Pain clinics are prohibited.

4. Services shall not be provided without an approved Operational Plan (Plan). A Plan shall be provided by the operator for the review and approval of the director. At the discretion of the director, a public meeting may be scheduled for the purposes of collecting input and feedback from neighboring property owners regarding the plan. The director shall approve, deny, or request modifications to the plan within forty-five days of receipt. The approved plan shall remain active throughout the duration of the operation and all operational requirements covered by the plan shall be complied with at all times. Modifications to the plan may be required at any time by the director to address negative impacts on the neighboring properties. At a minimum, said plan shall contain provisions addressing the areas outlined below. a. Security and safety- addressing both on- and off-site needs. b. Loitering/trespass/noise control - with specific measures regarding operational controls to minimize, to the extent possible, trespass on private property or the congregation of clients in the vicinity of the facility during hours that services are not provided.
c. Management of outdoor areas - including a system for daily admittance and discharge procedures and monitoring of waiting areas with a goal to minimize negative impacts to neighboring properties.
d. Communication and outreach - with objectives to maintain effective, ongoing communication and response to operational issues which may arise within the neighborhood. The director shall be provided with the name, cell phone number and email address for the on-site supervisor. e. Litter control - with the objective of providing for the removal of litter attributable to clients within the vicinity of the facility. f. Site plan - that shows the location of the vehicle, setbacks to property lines, parking lots, fire lanes and accessible paths of travel. The vehicle shall avoid blocking fire lanes and accessible paths of travel. To the extent possible, the vehicle shall be located in rear or side yards in existing paved areas. The vehicle shall not be parked in landscaped areas.
g. Duration of operations - limited to no more than two days per site per week, except in cases of transitional uses, disaster relief, health fairs, and other similar cases at the discretion of the director.
h. Hours of operation - shall generally be limited to 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.

Special events such as blood drives and health fairs may be allowed beyond these hours at the discretion of the director.

Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2637 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site)

5. Appeal of the determination to deny the approval of a plan or to contest the imposition of a permit requirement imposed after approval of a plan shall be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 18.11 (Common Procedures) set forth in this Title.

K. Food Trucks. Commercial vehicles parked on private property from which operators sell prepared food and beverages to the public (hereafter "food trucks") shall comply with the following conditions and requirements:

1. Food trucks shall be registered with the California Department of Motor Vehicles and shall be permitted by the Shasta County Environmental Health Division, and operators shall possess a valid City of Redding business license.

2. Food trucks shall be permitted only in zoning districts that allow full service restaurants either as a permitted use or with director approval of a site development permit.

3. Food trucks shall be permitted only on developed sites with existing occupied or unoccupied buildings permitted for commercial, industrial or public and semipublic uses.

4. Food trucks shall not operate for more than three hours per site per day, but may park on said sites for up to one hour prior to operating and up to one hour after ceasing daily operations.

5. Food truck operations, including seating areas but excluding customer parking, shall not utilize more than ten percent of on-site parking spaces.

6. Food trucks shall only operate between 7:00 a.m. and 12:00 a.m., except on sites which abut Residential districts, in which case they shall only operate between 8:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.

7. Food trucks shall maintain trash receptacles on-site and pick up any trash left onsite prior to ceasing daily operations.

L. Food Concessions. Food concessions, including hot dog stands, may be permitted when located adjacent to an existing retail building.

M. Declaration of a Shelter Crisis. An Emergency Housing Facility is a facility approved by the City Council which provides short-term, temporary shelter to not more than thirty (30) individuals using Emergency Sleeping Cabins and must conform to the definitions for Emergency Housing Site and Emergency Housing Facilities, as defined by Appendix O of the California Building Code and Appendix X of the California Residential Code.

Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2637 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site)

1. No person shall operate an Emergency Housing Site unless the City Council has declared the existence of a shelter crisis under the Shelter Crisis Law (Gov. Code sections 8698-8698.4) and issued a permit for an Emergency Housing Site.

2. Emergency Housing Sites must adhere to the Administrative Guidelines as adopted by resolution of the City Council.
a. Emergency Housing Sites are not authorized or restricted in any particular zoning within the City limits, but must satisfy the following criteria:

1. Be situated more than 500 feet, measured from property line to property line, from any of the following: childcare center; childcare in-home (family day care home); school (K-12); formal park; or museum; and

2. Be situated not less than one-half mile, measured from property line to property line, from any other Emergency Housing Site.

3. Emergency Housing Sites shall be subject to the following conditions:
a. Setbacks. Emergency Sleeping Cabins must be set back a minimum of five (5) feet from all lot lines, and ten (10) feet from all other temporary or permanent structures.
b. Screening. Emergency Housing Sites must provide screening, as determined by the City, so that the viewshed from adjacent public or private property is minimized.
c. Paving. All surfaces within the footprint of the Emergency Housing Site must have a hard surface consisting of asphalt concrete paving, concrete, masonry block or other similar material unless otherwise specifically approved by the City Council.
d. Potable water. The operator of the Emergency Housing Site must provide potable water for all occupants.
e. Hours of operation and quiet hours. The Emergency Housing Site must always be accessible for registered occupants. Regular hours for occupant intake and discharge must be posted. The Emergency Housing Site manager shall enforce quiet hours between 10:00 PM and 6:00 AM. f. On-site personnel. A manager must be on-site when occupants are present and during normal operating hours. The manager’s area shall be located near the primary entrance to the facility. The manager’s name, telephone number, and e-mail address must be posted and easily visible to the public.

Notwithstanding the above, an Emergency Housing Site, accommodating Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2637 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) six persons or less, may recommend alternative on-site management criteria.
g. Lighting. Pedestrian pathways and parking lots must be well lit. Lighting must be designed, located, or screened so that it is not directly visible from any participant’s shelter unit. Any illumination must not produce glare or reflection for occupants of neighboring buildings or on public streets. h. Waiting area and common space. The Emergency Housing Site must provide a waiting area and common space.
i. Personal storage. Occupants must be provided a safe and secure place to store personal property sufficient to accommodate all such property not reasonably subject to stowage in the Emergency Sleeping Cabin. j. Restrooms. The Emergency Housing Site must have a minimum of one (1) toilet for every fifteen (15) occupants.
k. Sanitation. The Emergency Housing Site must be maintained in safe and sanitary conditions and free of vermin, vectors, and matter of an infectious or contagious nature. The Emergency Housing Site must be kept clean and free of debris, filth, garbage, and deleterious matter. All garbage and food waste must be deposited in covered receptacles which are emptied when necessary and when full, and the contents disposed of in a sanitarymanner. l. Water Meter. A lot or parcel with an Emergency Housing Site may be allowed to use an existing metered water service connection of an adjoining lot to provide water service for the Emergency Housing Site. The owner of the adjoining lot must consent, in writing, to the use by the Emergency Housing Site and must install backflow protection compliant with City standards at the City point of service. The owner of the adjoining lot served by the existing water service connection shall be liable for all rates, charges, and fees for the water service furnished to the existing water service connection and used by the Emergency HousingSite.
m. Length of Stay. Residents of an Emergency Housing Site may not stay more than ten (10) months in any twelve (12) month period.

4. Operators and occupants of Emergency Housing Sites that receive and comply with a permit issued under this Section are exempt from the provisions of Chapter 10.40 of the City of Redding Municipal Code.

5. An Operational Plan for the Emergency Housing Site must be developed in accordance with the Administrative Guidelines for Emergency Housing Sites and approved by the City Council as part of the permitting process.

Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2637 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site)

6. Emergency Housing Sites will require site plan and design review by the City Manager prior to Council consideration.

7. Emergency Sleeping Cabins must comply with Appendix O of the California Building Code and Appendix X of the California Residential Code as adopted by the City Council of the City of Redding.

8. Emergency Sleeping Cabins be must be part of an Emergency Housing Site, as defined by this Section.

9. No fee shall be charged for the review and issuance of a permit as described in this Section.

10. All permits granted under this Section remain in effect only during a shelter crisis, as declared by resolution of the City Council. Upon the expiration or repeal of the city’s shelter crisis declaration, or the repeal of this Section, all administrative permits granted under this Section expire and all permit holders must immediately cease operations and return the Emergency Housing Site to its previous condition.

A. Permits issued pursuant to this Section are not property, they have no value, do not create vested rights, and cannot confer nonconforming status.

B. No permit, or renewal of a permit, granted pursuant to this Section shall exceed a term of one (1) year.

C. A permit granted pursuant to this Section may be renewed. Unless waived in writing by the City Manager, the Permittee must provide notice to the City Manager of its intent to apply for renewal at least ninety (90) calendar days before the expiration of the permit.

11. In addition to any other remedy allowed by law or equity, any person who violates a provision of this Section is, without prejudice to the exercise of other remedies in law or equity, subject to enforcement in the manner described in Chapters 1.13,

1.14 and 1.15 of the City of Redding Municipal Code.

12. Violations of this Section are hereby declared to be a public nuisance.

13. All remedies prescribed under this Section shall be cumulative and the election of one or more remedies shall not bar the City from the pursuit of any other remedy for the purpose of enforcing the provisions hereof.

14. Pursuant to Government Code section 8698.4(a)(5)(C), the City Manager shall, not later than July 1st of the year following the declaration of any shelter crisis, develop a plan to address the shelter crisis, if declared, which shall include the development of homeless shelters and permanent supportive housing as well as onsite supportive services. The City Manager shall also make the annual report required by Government Code section 8698.4(a)(6).

Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2637 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) Section 3. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance.

The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.

Section 4. The City of Redding finds that, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15061(b)(3) (there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment), the adoption of this Ordinance is therefore not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review. The ordinance will not increase traffic but serves only to redirect traffic which already exists.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 1st day of June, 2021, and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the 15th day of June, 2021, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mezzano, Schreder, Winter, and Resner NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Dacquisto
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
_/s/Kristen Schreder _______________
KRISTEN SCHREDER, Vice Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_/s/Pamela Mize____________________ _/s/ Barry E. DeWalt_________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2637 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ORDINANCE NO. 2638

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING REDDING
MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 16 (BUILDINGS AND CONSTRUCTION),
CHAPTER 16.02 (BUILDING CODE) BY AMENDING SECTION 16.02.010 (CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE ADOPTED); AND CHAPTER 16.03
(RESIDENTIAL CODE) BY AMENDING SECTION 16.03.010
(CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE ADOPTED), RELATED TO

ADOPTING APPENDICES TO THE UNIFORM CODES IN ORDER TO

FACILITATE ADOPTION OF STANDARDS RELATING TO

EMERGENCY SHELTERS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council of the City of Redding makes the following findings of fact necessary for changes or modifications to the 2019 California Building Standard Code due to local conditions which may necessitate a declaration of a shelter crisis:

1. Title 16 of the Redding Municipal Code (“RMC”) generally adopts the provisions of the 2019 California Building Standards Code subject to modifications made necessary by local conditions.

2. Appendix O of the California Building Code and Appendix X of the California Residential Code, both a part of the 2019 California Building Standards Code, set forth standards for emergency housing and emergency housing facilities to ensure the protection of public health and safety when there has been a declaration of a shelter crisis pursuant to Government Code section 8698.

3. Government Code section 8698(e) defines a “shelter crisis” as the duly proclaimed existence of a situation in which a significant number of persons are without the ability to obtain shelter, resulting in a threat to their health and safety.

4. Government Code section 8698.4 provides, in pertinent part, that a city may adopt by ordinance reasonable local standards and procedures for the design, site development, and operation of homeless shelters and the structures and facilities therein, to the extent that strict compliance with state and local standards or laws in existence at the time of that adoption would in any way prevent, hinder, or delay the mitigation of the effects of the shelter crisis.

5. Government Code section 8698.4(a)(2) also provides, in pertinent part, that a city may deviate from the standards provided in the 2019 California Residential Code Appendix X and California Building Code Appendix O if it makes findings stating why the standards cannot be met and stating how the standards in the ordinance protect health and safety.

Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2638 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site)

6. There are ready-made emergency sleeping cabins immediately available in the market for purchase which have sixty-four (64) square feet of interior floor area, and these cabins would make an immediate impact in housing the homeless.

7. There appear to be no ready-made emergency sleeping cabins which are immediately available in the market for purchase which have seventy (70) square feet or more of interior floor area.

8. Requiring a minimum interior floor area of seventy (70) square feet for emergency sleeping cabins would require design, plan check, and fabrication thereby significantly delaying the ability to move individuals out of the elements and safely into shelter in an environment where services are available.

9. In order to immediately respond to a shelter crisis, the square footage standards set forth in the 2019 California Residential Code Appendix X and California Building Code Appendix O must be reduced because the primary concern in a shelter crisis is the immediate protection of the of the safety and health of the homeless individuals.

10. There is no appreciable reduction in the health and safety of the intended occupants of the emergency sleeping cabins by reducing the square footage requirements in the 2019 California Residential Code Appendix X and California Building Code Appendix O by six (6) square feet for single occupants and twenty (20) square feet for two occupants.

11. The City Council therefore determines that strict compliance with the floor area requirements set forth in Appendix O of the California Building Code and Appendix X of the California Residential Code would prevent, hinder and delay the mitigation of the effects of a shelter crisis, when declared.

Section 2. Title 16 (Buildings and Construction), Chapter 16.02 (Building Code), Section16.012.010 of the Redding Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.02.010 - California Building Code adopted.

A. That certain document, a copy of which is on file and open for inspection in the City of Redding permit center, marked and designated as "California Building Code (CBC), 2019 Edition, Volumes 1 and 2," published by the International Code Council, is adopted as the building code of the city and is included in and made a part of this code as though set forth at length herein.

1. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, California Building Code, Appendix O, Emergency Housing, is adopted as though set forth at length herein excluding therefrom any requirement that an emergency sleeping cabin shall not be less than seventy (70) square feet of interior floor area for one occupant and fifty (50) square feet for each occupant in excess of one (1), and, in lieu of said requirement, establishing that an emergency sleeping cabin shall not be less than Packet Pg. 639 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2638 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) sixty-four (64) square feet of interior floor area for one occupant and one hundred (100) square feet for two occupants.

B. Snow load CBC Section 1608 is replaced by the following:
1608.1 General. Design snow loads shall be determined by the Building Official.

C. Delete CBC Section 1905.1.7 and adopt 2019 Los Angeles Area Regional Uniform Code Program (LARUCP) recommendation 19-01 per the 2019 edition of the LARUCP.

D. Add the following exception to CBC Section 1613.2.5:

Exception: Structures not assigned to Seismic Design Category E or F above shall be assigned to Seismic Design Category D.

E. Add the following exception to CBC Section 1613.2.5.2:

Exception: Seismic Design Category shall be determined per exception to Section 1613.2.5.

F. Delete CBC Section 1807.1.5 Exception.

G. Delete CBC Section 1807.1.6.

H. Amend CBC Section 2308.4.6 to read:

Floor, attic, and roof framing shall be laterally supported in accordance with AF & PA NDS Section 4.4.1.2.

Section 3. Title 16 (Buildings and Construction), Chapter 16.03 (Residential Code), Section 16.03.010 of the Redding Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows:

16.03.010 - California Residential Code adopted.

A. That certain document, a copy being on file and open for inspection in the City of Redding permit center, marked and designated as "California Residential Code (CRC), 2019 Edition," published by the International Code Council, is adopted asthe residential building code of the city and is included in and made a part of this code as though set forth at length herein.

1. California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2.5, California Residential Code, Appendix X, Emergency Housing is adopted as though set forth at length herein excluding therefrom any requirement that an emergency sleeping cabin shall not be less than seventy (70) square feet of interior floor area for one occupant and fifty (50) square feet for each occupant in excess of one (1), and, in lieu of said requirement, establishing that an emergency sleeping cabin shall not be less than Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2638 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) sixty-four (64) square feet of interior floor area for one occupant and one hundred (100) square feet for two occupants.

B. Add the sentence "SDS shall be taken as greater than 0.50" to the end of California Residential Code Section R301.2.2.1.1.

C. Section R313.2.1.1 - Other Occupancies.

Section R313.2.1.1 is added to read as follows:

Group S occupancies constructed on private residential zoned parcels shall be designed to NFPA 13D as approved by the fire code official.

D. Section R313.2.2 – Additions.

Section R313.2.2 is added to read as follows:

Additions to any existing California Residential Building Code regulated buildings that increase the existing square footage by 50% or more shall meet the requirements for a newly constructed building. All additions to any existing California Residential Building Code regulated building with an existing automatic sprinkler system regardless of size shall be required to extend the sprinkler system into the addition per Section R313.2.

E. Section R313.2.3 – Remodels, alterations, or repairs.

Section R313.2.3 is added to read as follows:

For remodels, alterations, or repairs to an existing California residential Building Code regulated building involving demolition, removal, alteration, or repair of more than 50% of the structure, the building shall meet the requirements for a newly constructed building.

For purposes of this section, “50%” threshold shall be applied if the project involves any of the following:

1. The removal, demolition, or repairs of more than 50% of the exterior weight bearing walls; or

2. The removal, demolition or repair of more than 50% of the roof structure (including the framing, sheathing, and roof covering of a building but not limited to rafters, trusses, beams, purlins); or

3. Where the removal, demolition or repair is deemed by the fire code official to be more than 50% of the structure.

F. Amend CRC Section R404.1.4.1 to read:

Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2638 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) Masonry foundation walls. In buildings assigned to Seismic Design Category D0, D1, or D2, as established in Table R301.2(1), masonry foundation walls shall comply with this section. In addition to the requirements of Table R404.1.1(1), plain masonry foundation walls shall comply with the following:

1. Wall heights shall not exceed 4 feet (1219 mm).

2. Unbalanced backfill height shall not exceed 3 feet (914 mm).

3. Minimum nominal thickness for plain masonry foundation walls shall be 8 inches (203mm).

4. Masonry stem walls shall have a minimum vertical reinforcement of one No. 3 (No. 10) bar located a maximum of 4 feet (1219mm) on center in grouted cells.

5. Vertical reinforcement shall be tied to the horizontal reinforcement in the footings.

Foundation walls in buildings assigned to Seismic Design Category D0, D1 or D2, as established in Table R301.2(1), supporting more than 3 feet (914 mm) of unbalanced backfill or exceeding 4 feet (1219 mm) in heights shall be constructed in accordance with the provisions of ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 402 or NCMA TR68-A. Masonry foundation walls shall have two No. 4 (No. 13) horizontal bars located in the upper 12 inches (305mm) of the wall.

G. Amend CRC Section R404.1.4.2 to read:

R404.1.4.2 Concrete foundation walls. In buildings assigned to Seismic Design Category D0, D1 or D2, as established in Table R301.2(1), concrete foundation walls that support light-frame walls shall comply with this section, and concrete foundation walls that support above-grade concrete walls shall comply with ACI 318, ACI 332 or PCA 100 (see Section R404.1.3). In addition to the horizontal reinforcement required by Table R404.1.2(1), plain concrete walls supporting light-frame walls shall comply with the following:

1. Wall height shall not exceed 4 feet (1219 mm).

2. Unbalanced backfill height shall not exceed 3 feet (914 mm).

3. Minimum thickness for plain concrete foundation walls shall be 6 inches (152 mm).

Foundation walls supporting more than 2 feet (1219 mm) of unbalanced backfill or exceeding 3 feet (2438 mm) in height shall be provided with horizontal reinforcement in accordance with Table R404.1.2(1), and not less than No. 4 (No. 13) vertical bars at a spacing not exceeding 48 inches (1219 mm).

H. Amend the first sentence of CRC Section R506.2.3 to read:

Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2638 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) Vapor retarder. A 15-mil polyethylene or approved equivalent vapor retarder with joints lapped not less than 6 inches (152 mm) shall be placed between the concrete floor slab and the base course or the prepared subgrade where no base course exists.

Section 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance, is for any reason held to be invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the remaining sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses or phrases of this Ordinance, or its application to any person or circumstance.

The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have adopted each section, subsection, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase hereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more other sections, subsections, subdivisions, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases hereof be declared invalid or unenforceable.

Section 5. The City of Redding finds that, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15060(c)(2) (the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment) and 15061(b)(3) (there is no possibility the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment), the adoption of this Ordinance is therefore not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 1st day of June, 2021, and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the 15th day of June, 2021, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Mezzano, Schreder, Winter, and Resner NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Dacquisto
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
_/s/Kristen Schreder _______________
KRISTEN SCHREDER, Vice Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_/s/Pamela Mize____________________ _/s/ Barry E. DeWalt_________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Ordinance No. 2638 (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) South Market Micro - Shelter Community (MSC)
Operations and Services Manual
Revised: October 27, 2022
1 Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR REDDING MICRO - SHELTER COMMUNITIES (MSCs)

1. The Micro - Shelter Community (MSC) will provide an atmosphere of dignity and respect for all participants.

2. MSC residents must participate toward increasing levels of self - reliance and self - determination. MSC staff will work with residents to assist them in achieving their goals.

3. The health and safety of residents, volunteers, staff, and the surrounding community should be safeguarded within each MSC.

4. Each MSC shall create equal opportunities for all persons needing emergency housing services by prohibiting discrimination due to religious affiliation, race, color, national origin, ancestry, political or religious beliefs, language, disability, family composition, gender identity and/or sexual orientation.

5. Protecting the privacy of the MSC residents and their personal information is required.

6. People who are experiencing homelessness may use substances to varying degrees. Admission, exit, and service restriction policies must be based on substance use alone, unless otherwise specifically provided for in this manual.

7. In order to provide effective MSC programs and services, residents must be offered opportunities to provide input and feedback in service provision and program planning for the program in which they participate.

8. MSC exits to stable housing through supportive services will occur within 10 months. Barriers to engagement will be considered to help assist residents to find stable housing with supportive services, if possible.

9. Equal opportunity and standardized procedures will be utilized when determining eligibility, admissions, sanctions, and dismissals, and when resolving grievances.

10.All program participants are entitled to enjoy the maximum amount of privacy within the constrictions of the MSC environment and program.

11. MSCs are part of a larger network of homeless services and agencies.

Collaboration within this network is essential to ensure effective and coordinated services.

12.All residents must be briefed and must sign an agreement to uphold the rules and guidelines for the MSC. Criteria for unacceptable behavior onsite includes but is not limited to persistent disruptive behavior, theft, use of alcohol or illegal drugs, or violence against yourself or others.
2 Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) Redding Micro - Shelter Communities (MSCs) Operations and Services Manual Index
CONTENTS:

1. Introduction

2. Roles and Governance

3. MSC Support Services

4. Operations - Administrative

5. Admissions, Non - Discrimination, and Resident Rights & Responsibilities

6. MSC Security Plans

7. Exiting Procedures

8. Grievance, Intervention Plan, and Involuntary Discharge

9. Safety Plan

10.Food Handling and Storage

11. Storage of Belongings

12.Animal Care

13.Medication and Standard Precautions

14.Alcohol, Drugs, Smoking, and Paraphernalia

15.Couples

16.Health and Sanitation

APPENDICES
A. Consultation Policy (Ref: #2.G).

B. Good Neighbor Policy (Ref: #4.A).

C. Application and Intake Questionnaire
D. Background Check & References
E. Appeal Form (Ref: #5.E.iv).

F. Resident Rights and Responsibilities (Ref: #5.I-J).

G. Resident Community Agreement (Ref: #5.F).

H. Grievance Document (Ref: #8).

I. Grievance Notice (Ref: #8).

J. Emergency Response Plan (Ref: #9).

K. Pet Ownership Agreement (Ref: #12).

L. Notice of Privacy Practices (Ref: #5.I.i).

M. Abuse Reporting Document (Ref: #9.B).

N. Drug and Alcohol Agreement (Ref: #16.B).

O. Housekeeping and Maintenance Plan (Ref: #9.M).

P. Donated Food Safety Standards Agreement (Ref: #10.B). 3 Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site)

1. INTRODUCTION
The Redding City Council adopted a resolution June 15, 2021, declaring a Shelter Crisis and established the criteria for permitting Emergency Housing Sites (EHS), hereafter referred to as Micro Shelter Communities (MSCs).

MSCs are operated by a host entity providing temporary accommodations in micro - shelters (non - buildings), not to exceed three hundred (300) days in any twelve - month period, for homeless individuals. For purpose of this definition, a “host entity” shall mean an organization which contracts with recognized community organizations to provide temporary shelter, counseling, and other services, as well as common areas for residents of the facility. A “micro - shelter” shall mean a shelter that is not constructed as a residential living unit per the California Residential Building Code; for example emergency sleeping cabins (micro - shelters).

The City of Redding authorizes MSCs to provide transitional low - barrier housing opportunities to adults in a safe, private, and secure environment. Through an array of on - site supportive services, community engagement, and direct contributions to the MSCs, residents are supported to build stability and self - sufficiency while bridging from homelessness to permanent housing.

Each MSC site will be owned or leased by the MSC host entity who is responsible for the day - to - day operations and property maintenance.

Residents will be coached and positioned to be responsible for much of the management of the MSC, providing the following benefits:
● Expanded staff capacity and flexibility
● Sense of place and ownership
● Increased self - reliance
● Skill building
Examples of MSC management include:
● Security and on - site gatekeeping
● Outreach
● Maintenance
● Operations (scheduling, tours, new resident orientation, resident exiting process, rules enforcement, etc.).
4 Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site)

2. ROLES AND GOVERNANCE
A. Probationary Resident: A new resident undergoing a 4 week trial period, to make sure that they can follow the Community Agreement before being fully accepted as a Resident in the MSC.

B. Resident: An individual or couple who currently resides in a micro - shelter at the MSC.

C. Lead Advocate: A volunteer from the Host Entity Team or community partner organization who takes primary responsibility for accompanying a particular resident on their journey through the MSC program. Lead Advocates may be assigned to couples but are discouraged from serving as Lead Advocate for two residents of the same MSC at the same time.

D. Resident MSC Advisory Council:

Shared governance is a core value of Redding Micro - Shelter Communities (MSCs). This means that the success of the MSC also rests on the residents. All current residents of South Market MSC are members of the Resident Council and have a voice on suggestions and concerns of the MSC and vote at resident council meetings.

Weekly MSC Resident Council Meeting. Residents and at least one MSC Host Entity team member can discuss and act upon issues related to the community.

Specific roles will be identified and filled in order to maintain a safe and sanitary environment. The following applies to MSC Resident Council meetings:
i. Any decisions made at the MSC meeting must comply with the MSC Manual and MSC Resident Advisory Council Agreement.
ii. Amendments to the governance and policy sections of the MSC Manual must be reviewed and approved by the MSC Host Entity and City of Redding before taking effect.

E. MSC Host Entity Team: (Non - profit organization, Business, or Church). The MSC Host Entity Team is to provide oversight, direction, and means for the ongoing development of its residents through the program and for the maintenance of the MSC. This team includes representatives from the MSC Host Entity, other churches, staff, or volunteers of the MSC, MSC residents, and perhaps a member of the surrounding neighborhood. This team establishes a long - term friendship with a resident. They provide support to the case manager and the resident in accomplishing their life transition and housing plan. Members of the MSC Host Entity Team (case manager, site coordinator, and program manager) will be responsible for financial, legal, administrative, safety, and 5 Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) sanitation matters. The Host Entity Team must meet at least monthly, and all residents must be informed of the meeting schedule and invited to attend.

F. MSC Safety Committee: (Ref: #9.C).

G. MSC Case Managers: (Ref: #3.A-B).

H. Staff Requirements: MSC must have sufficient staff on duty at all times. MSCs must make provisions to have on - call staff available. On - Site Caretaker will contact On - Call Supervisor, if needed.

Staff Schedule:

Case Manager: Monday - Friday (8:30am - 5:00pm)
Site Coordinator: Monday - Friday (10:00am - 7:00pm)
On - Site Caretaker: Monday - Friday (5:00pm - 9:00pm)
On - Call Manager: Will be contacted by staff immediately if an issue is unable to be resolved or contacted by residents when needed, if other staff is not onsite.

While efforts should be made to allow residents to negotiate daily challenges as part of their program, MSCs must have a supervisor or manager available on call to the program at al times for consultation to staff about challenging resident situations and other urgent matters. All MSCs should have a consultation policy in place that outlines how and when contacts should be made up the chain of command. (See Appendix A for Consultation Policy).

MSC must have at least one staff person on duty (on - site or on - call at all times). Paid, On - Site Caretaker or Volunteer designee will be on - site or available by phone 24 hours a day, 365 days per year.

At least one staff person will be on - site an average of 4 - 8 hours per day. When no staff person is on - site, the 24 hour hotline will be used to ensure access to immediate response for residents, volunteers, and members of the neighborhood who might encounter pressing concerns. This hotline number can be found in the Consultation Policy (Ref Appendix A). Calls to the 24 hour hotline number will be directed to the current on - call individual who will sign up to receive those calls during their on - call shift. This person must be located within a 15 minute drive from the MSC for prompt response to any issues requiring an on - site response. 6 Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site)

3. MSC SUPORT SERVICES:

A. Case Management and Support Services.

In order to make maximum use of existing supportive services in the community and participate in efforts to coordinate care across agencies, the MSC will arrange for professional case management services for the residents of their MSC. The agency providing these services must be registered as a Participating Agency according to the NorCal CA 516 Homeless Continuum of Care’s HMIS Policies and Procedures manual
(https://www.co.shasta.ca.us/docs/libraries/housing-docs/2020-hmis-policies-proc edures.pdf?sfvrsn=bb0ff389 ). Support services include information and linkages to health resources, case managers, employment opportunities, financial budget education, application assistance for external services and resources, and guidance in accessing local community services.

Case managers will help each resident to develop a life transition and housing plan. This plan will help residents identify challenges and provide services for them to choose from in order to gain self - sufficiency and permanent housing.

The case manager will help the residents develop a timeline around their goals and identify services and resources that will help accomplish goals. The Host Entity Team will partner with the residents in conducting regular evaluations and updates of their life transition and housing plan.

The following case management services must be available to program participants receiving these services. To ensure the consistent delivery of case management services, operators must incorporate written case management procedures and forms that include the following:
i. Referral Procedures: Establish referral and follow - up procedures to confirm participants are connected to services to which they are referred.

Documentation of referrals made and referral confirmation must be maintained in participant files.
ii. Health and Wellness referrals: Ensure participants are linked to and assisted in accessing medical health, mental health, and any needed alcohol and drug services.
iii. Mainstream Benefits: Establish procedures for screening participants at program entry and intake for eligibility to mainstream benefits. Assisting participants by coordinating the completion and submission of applications 7 Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) for public benefits and entitlements (e.g. general assistance, SNAP, SSI/SSDI, Veteran benefits) health insurance benefits (e.g. Medi-Cal, Medicare, Covered California, etc.), and other sources of financial assistance.
iv. Education/life skills
v. Employment Development/Placement Programs: Assessing employment history and goals and assisting participants to engage in services that will prepare the individual to obtain employment in collaboration with participating agencies.

B. Housing Case Management.

Residents must be offered, and are required to participate in, services they need in order to attain and stabilize in permanent housing. Regular case management services must be documented based on the Record Keeping policy (Ref #4.B.v). i. Development of an individualized service plan based on needs, circumstances, and market conditions, focused on helping individuals find and keep permanent housing and linkages to other community based supportive services as needed.
ii. Creating a referral network for other services and coordinating with other service providers and case managers.
iii. Housing navigation services to facilitate a match to an appropriate housing placement that connects residents with needed resources, protects residents from the stress of navigating housing access, and supports residents in managing their own lives within scope of their available resources and abilities.
iv. Housing support will include locating the most appropriate housing placement, establishing relationships with private and public owners and rental agencies, assisting with housing applications and appeals and negotiation of rental agreements, facilitating shred housing options, and assisting with the move in process, including identifying resources for basic furnishings, accessibility modifications, or other expenses.

C. Database Management System.
8 Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) Within 48 hours of the initial case management meeting, and as part of the case management protocol, data on all residents will be entered or updated in the Homeless Management and Information System (HMIS), pursuant to the data standards required. Resident files will be maintained in accordance with the requirements of (HMIS) operated by the NorCal Continuum of Care (NorCal CoC). For complete information on HMIS Data Standards, contact the NorCal CoC at 1450 Court Street, Suite 108, Redding, CA 96001, (530) 225-5160.

D. Workshops and Learning Opportunities.

Workshops and learning opportunities will be offered on or off - site, facilitated by the Host Entity or provided by partner agencies or volunteers. Residents will have the opportunity to engage in various workshops and trainings supporting their life transition and housing plans. Workshops and learning opportunities will apply to day - to - day life, resulting in long - term sufficiency. The determination of the workshop schedule will be based on the needs of the residents and may include (not exhaustive):
● Skill acquisition: internships, on - the - job training at local businesses, workshops, etc.
● Employment: resume building, and job search techniques ● Financial literacy
● Nutrition
● Conflict management, communication, and relationship building workshops
● Community service activities
● Pet health
The Host Entity Team will be responsible for the coordination of these services and will provide a regular calendar of events to residents and partners.

4. OPERATIONS - ADMINISTRATIVE
A. Good Neighbor Policy. Develop and post Good Neighbor Policies addressing the MSC premises, immediate surrounding neighborhood, and community:

Community collaboration, mutual goals, safety, property guidelines, code of 9 Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) conduct, and regular communications. These policies must clearly show provisions for how the MSC actively discourages and addresses excessive noise or loitering from MSC residents and others who may be near the site. Where applicable, the MSCs must demonstrate coordination with other service providers and community partners to address the above issues and their impacts. The Good Neighbor Policies will be submitted to the City for review and approval as part of the permit issuance process. The Host Entity must provide written notification to all property owners within a 600 foot radius of the proposed site. (See Appendix B for Good Neighbor Policy).

B. Program Policies and Guidelines.
i. Hours. All MSCs must post hours of operation in highly visible locations and at all entrances. If the MSC is open 24/7, residents must be allowed access to their possessions and to the facility common space at all times.

If access to sleeping areas is not available during the day, accommodations should be made to allow access for those residents working irregular hours, those who are ill, etc. Specific accommodations will be defined in the Operations Plan. All MSCs must provide facilities available to residents for sleeping for a minimum of eight (8) hours.

The MSC Manager shall enforce quiet hours. Quiet hours are from 10:00pm - 7:00am. These hours have been established based on standard residential neighborhood quiet hours.
ii. Curfew. Curfew is 10pm to accommodate work schedules and keep in line with quiet hours. This policy will be consistently enforced. Missing a curfew cannot be a reason for denial of entry or exit unless the late arrival compromises the health or safety of other residents or staff, or if the resident's late arrival repeatedly interferes with the rights of other residents to peaceful enjoyment of the facility.
iii. Input. The Host Entity Team shall provide residents with on - going opportunities to provide feedback and make suggestions regarding programming rules. This can be accomplished in a variety of ways including exit interviews, surveys, one - on - one interviews, resident focus groups, inclusion of homeless or formely homeless members on the agency board of directors or subcommittee, having homeless or formerly homeless people trained and hired as staff, and or the creation of a MSC Residents’ Advisory Council (Ref: 2.D).
10 Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) In addition to any other activities, Host Entity Teams must host “resident optional” meetings once per month and provide at least 24 hours advance notive to residents of the meeting time and location.
iv. Health Services Access. The MSC Host Entity Team will encourage residents to obtain and maintain health insurance, obtain a primary care provider and access immunization services. This must include publicly posting or otherwise making available information on health related services.
v. Recordkeeping. The MSC must maintain thorough and organized client records, including intake interviews, services provided, and any grievances or disciplinary action related to the client. These files may be kept electronically, in physical form, or a combination. MSC resident records must be stored in a secure and locked area, accessible only to case managers and members of the Host Entity Team.

Records should include; demographics, program operations and maintenance, residents’ individual progress, metrics to measure levels of success, budget and sustainability, partnerships, and community involvement. Records an MSC may also wish to include: resident’s presence and absence, visitor logs, chore logs and sign - ups, medication logs, services provided to residents at the MSC, and other records as determined by the MSC Host Entity Team.
vi. Assessment. A basic assessment that includes an evaluation of the service needs of the occupant, information about past or current services received and other information necessary to provide services must be conducted or updated for all occupants.
vii. Transportation. Transportation is required to help resident’s access essential services such as, community based services, medical services and housing searches. Shuttle service and bus passes may be utilized.

Accommodations must be made for disabled persons who are unable to access general means of transportation. Universal accessibility to transportation must be made available, such as RABA, the use of bicycles, or forms of private transportation.
11 Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site)

5. ADMISSIONS, NON - DISCRIMINATION, AND RESIDENT RIGHTS & RESPONSIBILITIES:

A. Application Process:
i. Application and Intake Questionnaire. Ref: Appendix C ii. Background Check and References. Ref: Appendix D
iii. Resident Community Agreement. Ref: Appendix H
B. Proposed candidates. Proposed candidates for MSCs will be sought from social service providers such as Hill Country, Empire Recovery, The Good News Rescue Mission, Visions of the Cross, Shasta County HHS professionals, Shasta Thrive, Pathways to Housing, etc.

C. Probationary period. The MSC Host Entity Team reserves the right to choose residents for an initial probationary period.

D. Admission. With assistance from the partnering professional case management agency, the MSC will strive to adhere to current Coordinated Entry standards as set by the NorCal 516 Continuum of Care (CoC) with regard to their referral and admission process. Appropriate modifications to this standard will be implemented based on the specific amenities, capacities, and limitations of a particular MSC site and the needs of its current residents. When there is a vacancy in the MSC, the Host Entity Team will work to fill it with as much speed as an intentional process allows. When feasible, admissions should be accepted on weekends. i. A program fee of 10% of residents monthly income will be charged to offset fees associated with the MSC. If an applicant does not have income, this is not a reason for denial of entry.
ii. Program fees are due by the 7th of each month
E. Denial of Admissions. Denial of admission to the facility can be based on the following and is at the discretion of the MSC:
i. Applicant does not meet the basic eligibility criteria for MSC admission (e.g. gender, age, homeless status, domestic violence perpetrator, etc.).

MSC with beds designated by funding sources as having additional 12 Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) restrictions (e.g. VA beds that require advance approval by the VA) may deny entry to those not meeting funding agency requirements. ii. A restraining order that prohibits admission to the facility. iii. Documented violent or threatening behavior.
iv. Conduct from prior stay at the MSC which puts the health and safety of staff or residents at risk (e.g. violence, weapons violations, disclosing private information of MSC or residents, and egregious damage to property). If an applicant is denied entrance based on a prior stay, the applicant must be informed of the reason, conditions for lifting the restriction and the right to appeal, including name of contact regarding an appeal and information about the appeal process.
v. The applicant requires care and supervision to manage the activities of daily living (feeding, toileting, selecting proper attire, grooming, maintaining continence, putting on clothes, bathing, walking, and transferring) without the appropriate support available on - site.

F. Upon admission. Residents must be provided with copies of the following documentation:
i. Resident Rights and Responsibilities. Ref: #5. I-J (Appendix F) ii. Resident Community Agreement. (Appendix G)
iii. Storage Policy. Ref: #11
iv. Medication Storage Policy. Ref: #13.A
v. Grievance Response Plan. Ref: #8 (Appendix H, Appendix I) vi. Emergency Response Plan. Ref: #9 (Appendix J)
vii. Pet Policy. Ref: #12 (Appendix K)
viii. Notice of Privacy Practices. Ref: #5.I.i (Appendix L) ix. Abuse Reporting Document. Ref: #8.B (Appendix M)
xi. Drug and Alcohol Agreement. Ref: #14.B (Appendix N) 13 Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) G. Resident Emergency Information. MSC staff must collect emergency contact information and information about health needs upon admission that may impact an emergency response. Such information should be kept in a place accessible to on - duty staff in the event of an emergency.

H. Discrimination. Redding MSCs shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion (creed), gender, gender expression, age (18 and over), national origin (ancestry) disability (as permitted within physical limits of current facilities), marital status, sexual orientation, military status, or any other characteristic protected under applicable federal or state law, in any of its activities or operations. These activities include, but are not limited to, hiring and firing of staff, selection of volunteers and vendors, selection of MSC residents, and provision of services. We are committed to providing an inclusive and welcoming environment for all MSC residents and members of our staff, clients, volunteers, subcontractors, and vendors.

I. Resident Rights.
i. Privacy: All paid and volunteer staff will protect the privacy of residents and never discuss private resident information with other residents or other staff without the explicit consent and presence of the resident under discussion. Residents will have a privacy agreement to read and have it explained to them verbally before signing.

All MSCs must have privacy policies which, at minimum, are consistent with Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) privacy and security requirements, make certain that files are kept in a secure location, and ensure that verbal communication of private information is done in such a way that avoids unintended disclosure. ii. Abuse Reporting. The MSC Host Entity Team will complete a sexual harassment prevention training course online. The team will provide residents with procedures and examples for reporting abuses during their initial orientation. A written protocol to report any known abuse to staff will be give to each resident and posted on the MSCs bulletin boards.
iii. Participation in Religious Activities. MSCs cannot require participation in religious activities as a condition of receiving 14 Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) emergency housing or services. Religious activities include moments of prayer, the saying of grace before meals, or spiritual studies. While these activities are not prohibited, participation in such activities may not be required.
iv. Rights. Resident rights must be provided in writing and posted in the facility in high visibility areas. All program requirements must be consistent with these standards. Rights must include:
a. Residents have the right to be treated with dignity and respect; b. Residents have the right to privacy within the constrictions of the MSC environment;
c. Residents have the right to be treated with cultural sensitivity; d. Residents have the right to self - determination in identifying and setting goals;
e. All paid or volunteer staff members of the MSC must engage with residents with professionalism and base their service to residents on valid, informed consent;
f. Residents should be clearly informed, in understandable language, about the purpose of the services being delivered, including residents who are not literate and or have limited English proficiency;
g. Residents have the right to privacy and have information about when private information will be disclosed, to whom and for what purpose, as well as the right to deny disclosure, unless disclosure is required by law;
h. Residents have the right to reasonable access to records concerning their involvement in the program.
v. Non - Discrimination/Reasonable Accommodations. All MSCs must have policies on non - discrimination and reasonable accommodation and make reasonable modifications in programs, activities and services when necessary to ensure equal access to 15 Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) individuals with disabilities, unless fundamental alteration in the nature of the program would result from the accommodation. vi. Transgender Access. All MSCs must comply with the HUD Rule on Appropriate Placement for Transgender Persons in Single - Sex Emergency Housing Sites and other facilities.
vii. Residents’ Mail. If an MSC provides mail service, any mail sent or received cannot be interfered with (e.g. staff opening residents’ mail, not providing mail to the resident as soon as practical, etc.).

J. Resident Responsibilities.
i. MSC residents are required to participate in the operations and management of their site and in the process of fulfilling their life transition and housing plan.
ii. Residents must abide by the MSC non - discrimination policy in their interactions with other residents. They must show respect for the property of others and report incidents of theft.
iii. Residents must abide by the Weapons Policy and the Drug and Alcohol Policy of the MSC. (Ref: #6.B, #14).
iv. Residents must abide by all site rules, including but not limited to upholding quiet hours, keeping personal and shared spaces clean and orderly, supervising pets, and helping to maintain the no - visitors and no loitering policies.
v. Residents are required to participate regularly in resident meetings to discuss ideas, share concerns, and determine solutions. vi. Residents will notify staff of any needed repairs and will not make any modifications or repairs to shelters or equipment, including but not limited to locks, lighting, and smoke detectors.
vii. Residents are expected to cooperate and collaborate in the shared goal of moving all residents toward fulfillment of their life transition and housing plans. All residents will support one another toward a positive exit into the next phase of recovery, rehabilitation, and or permanent housing.
16 Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site)

6. MSC SECURITY PLAN
A. Access. Security measures shall be identified to safeguard the residents, operators, staff, and, the surrounding community. Security measures may be adapted to fit current needs of the MSC but must include adequate outdoor lighting.

Access. The MSC shall be fully fenced with privacy slats, and all gates will remain locked outside of business hours, Monday - Friday 8:30am-5:00pm.

Residents and vetted staff persons, including staff of United Way of Northern California, shall have access to the MSC 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.

Individuals who are not residents, staff, volunteers, and service providers of the MSC, and are not accompanied by a staff person are not permitted to enter the MSC at any time.

B. Weapons. The health and safety of our residents, staff, volunteers, and surrounding community must be prioritized in the context of the Micro - Shelter Community. Therefore, weapons may not be stored, transported, or used on - site at the MSC by residents, their guests, staff, or MSC visitors. Any weapons that a resident brings on property will be logged and stored in a secure storage area. Weapons include but are not limited to, pepper spray, mace, knives longer than 3 inches, bats, clubs, and tasers. All firearms and explosive devices are strictly prohibited from the MSC property.

If the Host Entitiy is unable to safely store the weapon, the resident is responsible to locate safe and legal offsite storage or safely dispose of the weapon before intake into the MSC. Checked weapons will be subject to the MSC Storage Policy.

C. Resident Visitors and Guests. MSC residents are in recovery and focusing on their program toward a new, sustainable lifestyle. Visitors and guests could be a distraction from this effort and are prohibited from visiting the MSC or its surrounding neighborhood. Infrequent exceptions to this policy are permitted at the discretion of the MSC Host Entity Team or via consultation with the Lead Advocate.

D. Security Responses (Ref: Appendix A, Consultation Policy). There are three stages of response for maintaining a secure and orderly environment within the MSC:
17 Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) Stage 1: MSC Resident Council
MSC Resident Council members are responsible for maintaining order when urgent situations arise.

Stage 2: MSC Host Entity Team
When MSC Council members are unable to gain the cooperation of a disruptive resident, they are to contact the appropriate person from the MSC Host Entity Team.

Stage 3: Redding Police Department
The Redding Police Department (RPD) is welcome to patrol the MSC as they would any other neighborhood in Redding. In cases where the law is being broken and residents are unable to gain cooperation of the offender, the RPD will be contacted. The previous two stages of response are to be tried first, if appropriate.

7. EXITING PROCEDURES
Preparations before departure and follow - up thereafter increases the likelihood of successful transitions from MSCs to more permanent housing options.

Over a period of time, case managers, lead advocates, and other supportive team members provide services to help residents achieve their individual goals, which may include recovery, economic and social mobility, and increased quality of life, in order to move to more stable housing.

Before departure is discussed with case managers and lead advocates, residents should receive assistance with identifying suitable housing options, completing application paperwork, seeking financial assistance, and practicing proper conduct when speaking with landlords.

A. MSC responsibilities at the time of resident departure. i. Special recognition of each resident acknowledging their accomplishments, such as a certificate, festive gathering for 18 Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) celebration, opportunities to share completed goals and future goals, etc. should be considered and implemented as appropriate. ii. Ensure that resident has collected all personal belongings, including medications and any stored/checked items that must be checked out using the Storage procedure listed below (Ref: #7.B). iii. Conduct an exit interview with several Host Entity Team members, to include review of resident’s future goals, community resource information applicable to the resident, and follow - up plans between the resident and the Host Entity Team. The exit interview should also include opportunity for the resident to provide feedback on all aspects of their MSC experience.

B. Storage of Belongings after Exit.

The MSC must provide for storage of belongings after a resident’s departure for a minimum of five (5) working days after the resident’s exit. Before exiting, both the resident and a representative of the MSC Host Entity Team must sign a document agreeing on the length of storage, clear procedures for residents to reclaim their possessions, and an explanation of the Abandonment procedures (Ref: #8.K) which will go into effect no fewer than 72 hours past the expiration of the agreed - upon storage period.

C. Preparing the MSC for a new resident. Vacated micro - shelters and personal storage units/areas must be cleaned and sanitized before a new resident can move in.

8. GRIEVANCE, INTERVENTION PLAN AND INVOLUNTARY DISCHARGE A. Complaints.
i. When a complaint is cause for concern, the MSC Resident Council will meet with said resident and discuss a plan of action to curtail the behavior. Hopefully early intervention will help prevent further and more severe action.
ii. In cases of a complaint by one resident against another, a third - party mediator from among the Host Entity Team will meet with both parties (and their Lead Advocates, if desired). This mediator will 19 Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) meet with the complainant and the alleged offender to discuss the issue and reach a resolution that is agreeable to both parties. iii. Whenever possible, residents should discuss and resolve complaints and disputes among themselves or at the Resident Council level. As needed, verbal or written complaints may be submitted to the Host Entity Team or on - call site manager, who will refer to the Consultation Policy to determine next steps.

B. Abuse Reporting.

All MSCs must have an abuse reporting policy that details communal responsibilities to report sexual, emotional, and verbal abuse and to whom it should be reported. This policy must also explain residents legal duties to report elder, dependent adult, child or animal abuse and a written plan and process for reporting such abuse to the appropriate reporting agency.

C. Rule and Violations.
i. When a rule break occurs, any resident may write an Incident Report and submit it to a MSC Host Entity Team member. A team of at least two MSC Host Entity Team members must respond within 48 hours with an appropriate level of intervention. These two team members should deliver written notice to the alleged offender. From there, the alleged offender has two options:
a. Accept the Incident Report with the proposed level of intervention.
b. Request that the MSC Resident Council provide a date at which they may appeal the decision to the MSC Host Entity Team.

D. Guidelines for Infractions.
● Level 1 - Verbal Warning
● Level 2 - Written Warning
● Level 3 - Potential expulsion from the MSC by the MSC Host Entity Team pending final meeting with mediator, the resident’s lead advocate and one other council member.
20 Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) E. Documentation. Formal and documented intervention decisions should include documented discussion by MSC Resident Council members.

F. Expulsion. In cases of expulsion from the MSC, where the resident is not an imminent threat to others, the resident to be expelled will be given a reasonable amount of time to make arrangements for their safety. No resident who is not an imminent threat to others will be expelled after 8pm.

G. Appeals.
i. Residents may appeal an Incident Report at a joint gathering of the MSC Resident Council and the MSC Host Entity Team. In cases of expulsion, the appeal may include resident - generated actions for addressing the problematic behavior that caused their expulsion rather than disputing the incident. A majority vote will either uphold the expulsion decision or determine an alternative plan incorporating suggestions from the resident, the Resident Council, and the Host Entity Team.
ii. Appeal Process:
a. The MSC Council reads incident report and informs resident of their decision.
b. Accused has a chance to respond and state their case. c. The MSC Council has a chance to ask questions of the accused. d. The MSC Council has opportunity to discuss the details of the incident.
e. A motion is made to vote on whether to “uphold” or “revise” the Council decision.
f. If a majority vote to revise, a new motion should be made stating a desired revision.

H. Involuntary Exit Reasons.

The following reasons may be used as a basis for exit from an MSC:
i. Possession of a weapon at the MSC.
ii. Assault or other violent behavior at the MSC.
21 Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) iii. Theft at the MSC.
iv. Destruction of property at the MSC.
v. Restraining order precludes continued residence.
vi. Resident behavior endangers health or safety of residents or staff.
vii. Presence of infectious disease that significantly increases the risk of harm to other residents or staff.
viii. Multiple violations of the Drug and Alcohol Use/Posession policy.
ix. Individual requires care and supervision to manage their activities of daily living (feeding, toileting, selecting proper attire, grooming, maintaining continence, putting on clothes, bathing, walking and transferring) without appropriate supports available on - site. Individuals exited due to care and supervision needs cannot be exited to the streets.
x. Refusal of personal property search when probable cause exists.
xi. Residents may be discharged for refusing multiple housing opportunities; however, evidence must be present that MSC staff actively attempted to engage the resident in services designed to support MSC exit to stable housing with
consideration given to each resident’s barriers to engagement. xii. MSC are not required to hold beds for longer than 72 hours. If a resident is absent from their bed for 72 hours without
appropriate notification to MSC staff regarding absence, the resident may be exited.

I. Grievance Process.

All MSCs must have a written appeal and complaint policy/protocol that is provided to each resident upon intake and is publicly in a location with high visibility to residents. At a minimum, the protocol must include:
22 Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) i. The opportunity for residents to present their case before a neutral decision maker (a supervisor or manager who was not directly involved in the incident or situation of the grievance). ii. Accommodation of third - party advocates in the appeal process.

Reasonable efforts must be made to coordinate with a resident’s lead advocate in order to schedule the appeal.
iii. A requirement that residents be given a written response to their appeal within a reasonable time frame.
iv. A provision that when a resident files an appeal related to his/her ability to stay in the MSC, the occupant may stay in the MSC until the appeal process is completed unless allowing the resident continued residence poses a risk to the health and safety of other residents and or staff.
v. An appeals procedure that allows residents to appeal, at a minimum, decisions related to admissions denials for cause, terminations and disciplinary actions.
vi. Provisions for providing residents with information about any subsequent appeals process available through program policies or any funding agency or their respective regulations.

J. Involuntary Exit Requirements.

All MSCs must provide a written copy of the procedure for filing a grievance to the resident when a resident is involuntarily exited. If it is not feasible to provide the procedure at the time of exit (e.g. the resident is being removed by law enforcement) this requirement may be waived; however, if the resident subsequently returns to the facility, the grievance procedure must be provided.

A resident may be denied future admission as a result of the circumstances of exit. The resident must be informed of the reason, the conditions for lifting the restriction and the right to appeal, including whom to contact regarding an appeal and information about the appeal process.

Unless the resident poses an immediate threat to the health and safety of other residents and or staff members, MSC should avoid exiting residents at night and 23 Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) must be approved by a supervisor if doing so. During hours that there is no supervisor on - site, there must be a supervisor available “on - call” to approve discharge decisions. Approval may be given verbally but should be documented in case notes.

K. Abandonment.

If a resident has been absent from the MSC for more than 72 hours without notice or communication with the Lead Advocate or Host Entity Team, the unit may be declared abandoned. When a unit has been declared abandoned, at least two (2) members of the MSC Resident Council will remove items from the abandoned shelter. They will document what items are present and place them in an available storage container or bag that is clearly labeled with the name of the former resident and the date of the abandonment. These items will then be stored in a separate storage unit until such time as the owner retrieves them or 30 days have passed since the declaration of abandonment. Once items have reached the 30 - day limit, the MSC will determine the proper disposal of said items during the next MSC Host Entity Team meeting. Abandoned belongings usually should not be distributed to other residents of the same MSC, but exceptions to this rule may be determined by the Host Entity Team.

9. SAFETY PLAN
A. 9-1-1. Residents shall report a fire or other emergency to 9 - 1 - 1.

B. Evacuation. Residents will be notified of a fire or other emergency and evacuate based upon the designated evacuation route. A Fire Safety and Evacuation Map must be posted on a public notice board in a common area. This map must include, at minimum, clear marking of the location of all MSC exits, fire extinguishers, and gas/propane shut offs (if any). A copy of this map will be provided to the Redding Fire Department and updates submitted as needed.

C. Safety Committee. A safety committee shall be formed with representation from the MSC Resident Team and MSC Host Entity Team. Duties of this committee shall include the following:
i. Development and implementation of Emergency Response Plan for the MSC.
ii. Oversight of fire drills and Food Storage Policy (Ref: #10). 24 Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) iii. Quarterly safety inspection with attention to trips, slips, and fall hazards.
iv. Quarterly testing of all smoke and CO2 detectors.
v. Quarterly testing of all extension cords and power strips with an approved circuit tester.
vi. Maintenance of systems and equipment installed to prevent or control fires.
vii. Maintenance and control of fuel hazard sources.
viii. CPR and first aid training.

D. In addition, any advocates, case managers, or MSC staff on site at the time shall be prepared to:
i. Assist others and provide emergency first aid including CPR in an emergency.
ii. Take a head count after an evacuation. Identify the names and last known locations of anyone not accounted for and provide them to the Fire Official in charge.
iii. Provide additional information or explanation of duties under the plan to residents and volunteers.

E. The following firefighting and fire protection measures will be taken:
i. No open flames permitted onsite.
ii. ABC fire extinguishers will be accessible throughout the MSC (see Fire Safety and Evacuation Map for locations).
iii. Smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms will be installed in common buildings and dwellings per City Code and will be inspected to insure they are functional and replaced if they are not functional.

F. Emergency Vehicle Ingress and Egress:
i. A fire lane with a minimum width of 20’ will be maintained. Other details to be determined for each specific MSC.
25 Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ii. A minimum 10 - foot setback and right - of - way will be maintained between structures on the MSC site.

G. Accessibility.

MSCs will conform to pertinent requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) for residents as needed.
https://www.ada.gov/pcatoolkit/chap7Shelterchk.htm . Beds designated as accessible must comply with federal height and distance standards requiring a minimum of 36 inches between sleeping units and a sleeping surface height btween 17 - 19 inches above the finished floor. Beds designated as accessible must be prioritized for residents with disabilities.

Program documentation must be provided in forms accessible to hearing - impaired and sight - impaired individuals, upon request. MSCs that provide transportation for residents must also make provisions for residents who need vehicles that are wheelchair accessible.

H. Basic Building Standards and Fire Safety.
i. Facilities must have annual fire inspections conducted by the fire department and conduct regular fire drills. Training must be provided to staff on fire safety.
ii. Amenities. The MSC must have a heating and ventilation system and maintain a comfortable temperature. Emergency Sleeping Cabins will comply with Appendix O of the California Building Code.
iii. The MSC shall have a housekeeping and maintenance plan to ensure a safe, sanitary, clean and comfortable environment. vi. The MSC shall provide each person with access to a single or double occupancy emergency sleeping cabin with a mattress and bedding (a blanket and pillow), all of which are clean and in good repair.
v. The MSC shall have a sufficient supply of functionally clean and reasonably private toilets and hand wash basins.
26 Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) vi. The MSC should have a sufficient quantity of functionally clean and reasonably private bathing facilities with hot and cold running water or will provide for access to bathing facilities at least twice per week through contract or other means. All bathing facilities must meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
vii. The MSC should have laundry facilities available to residents, or access to laundry facilities nearby or transportation to laundry facilities will be provided.
viii. The MSC shall provide towels, soap, toilet tissue, and feminine hygiene products.

I. Maintenance/Repairs. The MSC Host Entity will be responsible for maintenance and repairs, making use as appropriate of resident participation.

J. Drinking Water. The MSC must provide access to drinking water at all times.

K. Outlet Access. The MSC must provide access to electrical outlets for charging personal devices such as cell phones and medical equipment. Emergency Sleeping Cabins must have outlets as required by California Building Code Appendix O.

L. Cleanliness.
i. Resident Participation. Bath and toilet areas and other common use areas must be cleaned daily. MSC must have proper trash receptacles that are emptied regularly.
ii. Both the interior and exterior of the facility must be free of debris, clutter and unsanitary items, and there must be no obvious safety risks.

M. Pest Control.
i. MSC must ensure adequate provision of pest control services. ii. MSC must have a protocol in place for the prevention and control of bed bugs and lice. (See
https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/bedbugs/forbestpracticesrelatedt obed-bugprevention).
27 Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) iii. 24 - hour notice must be provided to residents of pest control activities unless the type and degree of infestation requires an immediate response (e.g. bed bugs).

N. Maintenance/Repair
i. Facilities must be maintained in good repair. The general appearance of the buildings and surrounding grounds must be well maintained and free from litter and offensive visual cues such as overladen shopping carts. There must be a written housekeeping and maintenance plan (Ref: Appendix O).
ii. MSC must post the process for reporting maintenance concerns, acknowledge issues reported within two days, and identify the timeframe for addressing the concern. Emergency maintenance items must be immediately addressed.

O. Phone Access. A telephone (land line or cell phone) must be available to staff for emergencies. Emergency numbers should be posted by the telephone or otherwise made available to on - duty staff.

P. Hazardous Materials.
i. In accordance with established standards, MSC must label all chemicals and cleaning supplies and keep all such materials out of reach of children. Any hazardous materials must be stored separate from food.
ii. No fires, including cooking or warming fires, will be allowed on site at any time.

Q. Entrance/Exits. Exits must be clearly marked and must be kept clear of blockage and tripping hazards.
i. Steps must have treads or similar accommodation to prevent slipping.
ii. Exit signage must be consistent with all applicable codes.

R. Agency Vehicle. If an MSC location maintains a vehicle used for resident transport, the vehicle must be properly maintained, licensed and insured. All drivers must properly be licensed. Provisions must be made to provide equal access to transportation services to disabled residents. 28 Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site)

10. FOOD HANDLING AND STORAGE
A. Sanitary Facilities. All MSCs that either prepare and serve meals or provide areas for residents to prepare and consume their own meals must ensure that all areas used for food storage and preparation are sanitary. Kitchen and dining areas must be kept clean and comply with all relevant health codes.

B. Donated Food. Programs that serve food prepared off - site by regular donors must provide donors with a handout that details the requirements for food preparation. All food donors must read and sign the handout to confirm knowledge of the standards and must provide current contact information (Ref:

Appendix P). Programs are discouraged from accepting food that has been prepared off - site by intermittent donors.

C. Meal schedule. Dinner will be provided. Residents are responsible for all other meals. If meals are served, a meal schedule must be posted.

D. Dietary Modifications. If meals are served or food is provided for residents to use to prepare their own meals, MSC must make dietary modifications and or provide appropriate food options based on residents’ health, religious, and or cultural practices. As feasible, food provided should promote healthy eating.

E. Dining Facilities. MSC must provide a table and chairs if food is served.

F. Food Allergies. Any snacks and meals provided should be provided with reasonable accommodations made for known allergies, including among children residing in the MSC. Providers should be asking about food allergies at intake; however, it is the parents’ responsibility to inform the program of children’s food allergies.

11. STORAGE OF BELONGINGS
All MSCs must have a written policy that is provided upon intake as to what provision is made for securing belongings including what possessions can be held by the program at resident request such as money, medications, and vital documents.

Storage of belongings is limited to residents’ personal micro - shelter and individual locking storage unit. Locks and or keys should be provided to residents as needed with the understanding that the Host Entity Team also holds keys and combinations.

Personal belongings that cannot be organized in the micro - shelter or locking storage unit must be stored off - site. Each resident is responsible to organize and pay for off - site storage of personal belongings.

If an MSC holds funds or possessions on behalf of residents, this service must be voluntary, the program must maintain a log of items in their possession, and the 29 Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) funds or possessions must be returned within operational hours upon the resident’s request. Each MSC decides how specifically to make their log, with consideration to their liability. It is expected that the log would track only those belongings that residents choose to store with the program and not all possessions brought into the MSC. This does not apply to belongings abandoned by a person who does not return to the MSC; in that situation, please refer to #8.K Abandonment.

In order to maintain a community free of clutter, each resident is responsible for maintaining a tidy unit. MSC must provide lockable lockers, storage trunks or make other accommodations which allow residents to securely store their belongings.

Reasonable access by the residents to their belongings must be provided.

12. ANIMAL CARE
Pet owners shall assume the responsibilities for caring for their animal. Water will be available. Additional provisions may be provided at the site. Some sites may be unsuitable for pets. Pet owners are also responsible for administering all regular medications to their animal. All pets must be licensed, vaccinated, spayed and neutered. Assistance can be provided to help meet these criteria.

The MSC reserves the right to refuse admittance to animals that appear too aggressive for the MSC to handle. Regardless of initial presenting temperament, enforcement of MSC rules to reduce the risk of bites and other injuries must be observed and include:

A. One pet per resident.

B. All animals should be handled only by their respective owners. No one should handle or touch pets other than their own without the owner’s permission.

C. All animals on MSC property should be leashed or confined (kenneled/carrier) at all times unless in the pet area.

D. All incidents involving aggressive animals are documented in writing prior to removal of the pet from the site.

E. The number of pets will be determined by site suitability.

F. No pets may be acquired AFTER acceptance into the MSC, unless otherwise approved through consultation with the lead advocate or case manager, and approval by the Resident Council.

G. If, at any time, the MSC Resident Advisory Council finds that a pet either poses a nuisance or danger to others or is not properly cared for, the pet must leave the MSC at the instruction of the MSC Resident Council. Residents may ask the MSC Resident Council for assistance in the proper training of their pet. 30 Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) H. If the resident is off - site without the pet, it must be under the supervision of another willing resident.

I. The owner is responsible for food, proper health and care of their pet, and must pick up all solid waste for their pet and properly dispose of it.

J. The owner must keep their pet from annoying other residents either through trespass, barking or any other means.

13. MEDICATIONS AND STANDARD PRECAUTIONS
The MSC Host Entity Team is not equipped to distribute medications, whether prescribed or narcotic. Each site will determine the level of resident medical needs and follow standard precautions.

A. Medication
MSCs may not administer or dispense medication and may not require residents to turn over medication, unless administered by a licensed staff person as part of an on - site supportive program in which an MSC resident is dually enrolled. If an MSC has provisions for securing prescription medications, it must have a written policy that is provided to an occupant upon intake detailing the MSCs and the occupant’s responsibility to store, secure and use said medication safely. MSC may encourage residents to lock medications in secure storage areas if made available in order to protect medication from theft but may not require residents to turn over medication.

B. Standard Precautions
Staff must comply with universal precautions, proper sharps disposal and have a written policy in place governing protocols related to standard precautions.

Standard precautions are the minimum infection prevention practices that apply regardless of suspected or confirmed infection status in any setting where health care is delivered.
● Hand hygiene.
● Use of personal protective equipment (e.g. gloves, masks, eyewear). ● Respiratory hygiene / cough etiquette.
● Sterile instruments and devices.
● Clean and disinfected environmental surfaces.

C. First Aid
Basic first aid supplies must be available on - site and accessible to staff at all times.
31 Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) D. Infectious Disease
i. MSCs are a valuable partner in public health and, as such, are responsible to report any suspicion of infectious disease within the MSC or among residents or staff (including COVID - 19) to the Shasta County Public Health Line (530-225-5591 or
1-800-971-1999 - Emergency answering service is available 24 hours a day, seven days a week).
ii. An infectious disease which significantly increases the risk of harm to other MSC residents or staff may be a reason for denial or exit. Residents with lice or scabies or exhibiting symptoms of Tuberculosis (TB) shall be allowed to stay in the MSC unless the disease or infestation cannot be appropriately contained (e.g. due to close quarters of facility), in which case those residents may be exited and referred to a health care provider for treatment.
iii. MSC must comply with California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Section 5199, regarding Aerosol Transmissible Diseases (ATD) control and worker and client safety expectations:
https://www.dir.ca.gov/title8/5199.html.

For additional guidance on this regulation and for information regarding best practices for control of infectious disease, please also refer to “Preventing Tuberculosis (TB) in Homeless Shelters” published by the Los Angeles County Department of Public Health:
http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/tb/docs/LATBGuidelinesforShelt ers.pdf

14. ALCOHOL, DRUGS, SMOKING & PARAPHERNALIA
In order for residents to begin their transition to permanent housing, alcohol and illegal drugs will not be allowed on - site at MSCs.

A. Smoking.

MSCs shall prohibit smoking indoors and reasonable efforts must be made to prevent smoke from entering buildings. No smoking should be allowed within 20 feet of MSC facilities unless this is infeasible due to layout of grounds. MSCs are required to follow any local ordinances regarding smoking in public areas. A designated smoking area and disposal receptacle will be provided at the site.

B. Drug and Alcohol Use/Possession.
32 Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) MSCs must have a policy prohibiting the possession, use, or distribution of alcohol or illegal drugs on the premises. If alcohol or drugs are found, residents should be given the opportunity to dispose of the prohibited substance.

Residents returning to the MSC inebriated is not cause for expulsion if they do not disrupt the community. Residents will also be offered opportunities to participate in rehab programs.

A single violation of this policy cannot be reason for exit unless the violation compromises the health or safety of other residents or staff. Multiple violations of this policy may be used as grounds for exit.
i. Admission, discharge, and service restriction policies must not be based on substance use or possession alone unless as noted above for multiple violations.
ii. Drug testing of residents is prohibited unless the testing is part of an agreed upon treatment plan with the resident. Submission to drug testing cannot be a requirement for residency, and refusal to participate in drug testing cannot be the basis for involuntary exit.
iii. Being under the influence on - site may not be the basis for discharge.
iv. Noncompliance with treatment or containment measures that endangers other residents may be cause for exit.

C. Legal and Prescribed Narcotics. Residents who are under the care of a licensed physician and have been prescribed controlled substances must notify the MSC Host Entity Team of their possession of these drugs and are responsible to securely lock these substances in their private storage at all times to prevent theft. Illegal sharing of controlled substances with other residents could be grounds for involuntary exit.

D. Search of Possessions.

Searches may only be conducted when there is “probable cause” to believe that the person has in his or her possession something which may jeopardize the safety of other residents or staff, including a weapon or illegal material such as illegal drugs, or something which is interfering with the peaceful enjoyment of the facility of other residents such as food that is attracting vermin. If the person does not consent to the search, and “probable cause” exists to search, the person may be given the choice of being exited or being searched.
33 Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) Any other items suspected to have been used for drug related purposes will be dealt with on a case - by - case basis by the MSC Host Entity Team. As per the signed resident agreement, shelters and storage can be inspected upon reasonable suspicion.

15. COUPLES
Couples must agree to abide by the following intervention policy if they have a fall - out which results in one person moving out of a couple’s unit. This must be filled out and signed by the couple during the interview process. “We, the couple, in the event of a fall - out resulting in an inability to live together and causing one person to move out of couple housing, will agree to MSC policy that (name) will move out of the couple’s unit.” Signed ____________________ and _____________________.

16. HEALTH AND SANITATION
A. Residents are required to participate in cleaning duties on - site.

B. Residents are required to maintain basic personal hygiene, including hair, face, body, hand, feet, nail, armpit, oral, and eye hygiene. Residents struggling with hygiene issues will be offered help to comply to avoid ramifications of non - compliance.
34 Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX A: CONSULTATION POLICY (REF: #2.G)
A micro - shelter community is a transitional community that provides residents a safe place to address the issues that led to their homelessness so that they can transition into permanent housing and a stable lifestyle. In order to accomplish these goals, the health and safety of participants, volunteers, staff, and the surrounding community must be safeguarded.

In the event of a life - threatening emergency, please dial 9-1-1.

When a challenging resident situation or other urgent matter that is not an emergency arises, please refer to the following consultation tree to contact someone who can help:

1. If it is safe to do so, attempt to address the concern directly with the resident(s).

2. If approaching resident(s) is unsafe or not possible, consult with the On - Site Caretaker.

3. If the On - Site Caretaker is unknown, unavailable or unable to resolve the situation, contact the Program Manager who is on - call at 347-852-4370. 35 Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX B: GOOD NEIGHBOR POLICY (REF: #4.A)
In the spirit of open communication, the exchange of ideas and concerns with any neighborhood in proximity of an MSC is essential.

The MSC Host Entity Team will:
● Publicly post the date and time of each Host Entity Team meeting and welcome the participation and input of any interested attendees. Only the members of the Host Entity Team will vote on matters requiring a formal vote. ● Make a good faith effort to include at least one resident of the immediate neighborhood around the MSC on the Host Entity Team.
● Publicly post the Consultation Policy, to include contact information for MSC leadership and after - hours access for 24/7 emergency concerns. ● Receive any concerns, suggestions, or questions from the surrounding neighborhood and respond to those inquiries with good faith and within a reasonable timeframe.
● Provide neighbors with access to the Consultation Policy, including the 24 - hour Contact phone number of pressing concerns.

The MSC residents will:
● Respect the rules of the MSC, including quiet hours, cleanliness of the MSC site and surrounding neighborhood, drug policies, and behavioral guidelines for relating to neighbors with dignity and respect.
● Take accountability for the behavior of any guests and pets in their care, including enforcing community rules, cleaning up after pets, and ensuring that pet vaccinations are up to date.
● Hold one another accountable for rule - breaking and help to establish an atmosphere of mutual support within the MSC.

The residents of the surrounding neighborhood will:
● Engage with residents, staff, and MSC Host Entity Team members with neighborly respect and dignity.
● Report any concerns, suggestions, or questions to the appropriate person according to the provided Consultation Policy.

MSC 24 - hour Contact Phone:_____________________________________________ MSC Host Entity Email Address:____________________________________________ MSC Postal Address:_____________________________________________________ 36 Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX C: APPLICATION & INTAKE QUESTIONNAIRE PG. 1 (REF: #5.A) Date:______________________
Legal Name:___________________________________________________________ Name Used:____________________________________________________________ Date of Birth:_____________________________________
Race/Ethnicity:__________________________________________________________ Gender:_____________________________ Preferred Pronoun:__________________ Driver’s License/State ID Number:____________________________ State Issued:__________ Expiration Date:______________________ Phone:_______________________________________________
Email:__________________________ Address:_______________________________ Please list two emergency contacts:

Name:_________________________ Relationship:____________________________ Phone:__________________________ Email:________________________________ Address:______________________________________________________________ Name:__________________________ Relationship:___________________________ Phone:__________________________ Email:________________________________ Address:______________________________________________________________ Do you have a pet: Yes / No
Kind:___________________Weight:_________________Breed:__________________ Is your pet spayed/neutered: Yes / No
Do you have any current pet vaccination documentation? Yes / No (Please submit copies as able).
37 Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX C: APPLICATION & INTAKE QUESTIONNAIRE PG. 2 (REF: #5.A) How did you become unhoused? ___________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Is this your first experience being unhoused: Yes / No
How long have you been without stable housing?_______________________________ Where were you staying before coming to the MSC? ___________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ How long have you been in the Redding area?_________________________________ What other states have you lived in?_________________________________________ Do you have any food allergies? If so, list here:________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Do you have a source of income: Yes / No If so, what source(s) and how much? a. ____________________________________________________________________ b.____________________________________________________________________ c: ____________________________________________________________________ Are you employed: Yes / No If so, where and how many hours/week? What is your schedule?_________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 38 Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX C: APPLICATION & INTAKE QUESTIONNAIRE PG. 3 (REF: #5.A) Previous work experience:
a.____________________________________________________________________ b.____________________________________________________________________ c.____________________________________________________________________ d.____________________________________________________________________ e.____________________________________________________________________ What goals do you have for yourself?
a.____________________________________________________________________ b.____________________________________________________________________ c.____________________________________________________________________ d.____________________________________________________________________ e.____________________________________________________________________ What other interests and hobbies do you have?
a.____________________________________________________________________ b.____________________________________________________________________ c.____________________________________________________________________ d.____________________________________________________________________ e._________________________________________________________________ Are you currently receiving any supportive services or Case Managment? Yes / No If so, what programs are you in?____________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 39 Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX C: APPLICATION & INTAKE QUESTIONNAIRE PG. 4 (REF: #5.A) Name and contact information of your Case Manager?__________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Are you required to register on a sex offender registry? Yes / No Do you have a vehicle? Yes / No
Year:__________________ Make:__________________ Model:__________________ This Micro - Shelter Community requires participation in the community council and a commitment to assist with upkeep of the grounds, common areas and personal areas.

Are you interested in a leadership position on the community council? Yes / No Are you willing to assist with the upkeep and cleanliness of the entire Micro - Shelter Community property? Yes / No
___________________________________ ____________________ Resident Signature Date
___________________________________ ____________________ MSC Staff Signature Date
40 Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX D. BACKGROUND CHECK (REF: #5.A)
We conduct a background check on all applicants. This housing program is not suitable for those with certain criminal offenses such as arson and sex offenses requiring registry. A criminal record is not necessarily disqualifying for admission into the program.

Last Name:_________________ First Name:_________________ Middle Initial:______ Date of Birth:________________ Last 4 digits of SSN:_____________ Have you ever been convicted of a criminal offense: Yes / No If yes, please state the City / Town, County and State, the date of the conviction, and charges you were convicted of. (Please use the back of the sheet if you need more room).

1. _______________ _______________ _______________ _______________ City State County Date/Year
____________________________________________________________________ Offense

2. _______________ _______________ _______________ _______________ City State County Date/Year
____________________________________________________________________ Offense
The information on this form is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I give permission to verify all information provided.
______________________________________ ____________________ Resident Signature Date
______________________________________ ____________________ MSC Staff Signature Date
41 Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX E: APPEAL FORM (REF: #5.E.iv and #8.G)
Persons wishing to appeal a decision of the Micro - Shelter Community Host Entity Team or Resident Council should complete and submit the bottom half of this form to the Host Entity Team Chairperson via one of the following methods:
● Email:___________________________________________________________ ● Postal Mail:_______________________________________________________ ● Drop - off at the Host Entity Office_____________________________________ Upon receipt of your appeal, the Host Entity Team will review the documents related to your admission denial or disciplinary action along with your appeal documentation. If warranted, you will be asked to speak to the Host Entity Team to answer any questions they might have. After discussion, the Host Entity Team will vote whether to uphold or revise the decision. If the decision is revised, a new agreement will be discussed with you and any involved parties. A written response to you appeal will be returned to you within 48 hours of the Host Entity meeting.

If you have questions regarding this appeal form of the appeal procedure, please contact you Case Manager or the Host Entity Team Chairperson. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MSC Notice of Appeal
Name of Person Appealing Decision:________________________________________ Type of Decision Being Appealed: { } Admission Denial { } Disciplinary Action Reason for Appeal (check all that apply):
{ } New or missing information now available (describe below) { } Decision violates policies and procedures outlined in MSC Operations Manual (describe below)
{ } Applicant wishes to propose an agreement to address disqualifying behavior or circumstance (describe below)
Please provide additional information about your reason for appeal:________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 42 Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX F: RESIDENT RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES (REF: #5.I-J) All incoming residents are required to review these rights and responsibilities and agree to uphold them in writing.

Resident Rights:

1. Residents have the right to be treated with dignity and respect;

2. Residents have the right to privacy within the constrictions of the MSC environment;

3. Residents have the right to be treated with cultural sensitivity;

4. Residents have the right to self - determination in identifying and setting goals;

5. Services should be provided to residents only in the context of a professional relationship based on valid, informed consent;

6. Residents should be clearly informed, in understandable language, about the purpose of the services being delivered, including residents who are not literate and/or have limited English proficiency;

7. Residents have the right to privacy and have information about when private information will be disclosed, to whom and for what purpose, as well as the right to deny disclosure, unless disclosure is required by law;

8. Residents have the right to reasonable access to records concerning their involvement in the program.

Resident Responsibilities:

1. MSC residents are required to participate in the operations and management of their site and in the process of fulfilling their life transition and housing plan.

2. Residents must abide by the MSC non - discrimination policy in their interactions with other residents. They must show respect for the property of others and report any incidents of the theft.

3. Residents must abide by the Weapons Policy and the Drug/Alcohol Policy of the MSC.

4. Residents must abide by all site rules, including but not limited to upholding quiet hours, keeping personal and shared spaces clean and orderly, supervising pets, and ensuring that all visitors abide by site rules when in the MSC or its surrounding community.

5. Residents are required to participate regularly in resident meetings to discuss ideas, share concerns, and determine solutions.

6. Residents will notify staff of any needed repairs and will not make any modifications or repairs to shelters or equipment, including but not limited to locks, lighting, and smoke detectors,

7. Residents are expected to cooperate and collaborate in the shared goal of moving all residents toward fulfillment of their life transition and housing plans. All residents will support one another toward a positive exit into the next phase of recovery, rehabilitation, and or permanent housing.

I have received, reviewed, and understand these rights and responsibilities.

Resident Signature:_________________________________ Date:________________ 43 Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX G: RESIDENT COMMUNITY AGREEMENT (REF: #5.F)
An MSC is a transitional community that provides residents a safe place to address the issues that led to their homelessness. Residents are expected to contribute to the governance and reinforcement of community guidelines:

I will be a positive member of this community and contribute toward making it a safe, secure, clean and pleasant place to live. Therefore, I agree to the following:
a. Have respect for myself and others regardless of ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, disability, lifestyle, or economic status. b. I will not carry a weapon, store weapons at the MSC, or act violently toward others or myself.
c. I will maintain mutual respect of others’ property and communicate any incidents or theft.
d. For the health of all community members, I will not possess or use alcohol or illegal drugs or paraphernalia on site. I will seek help to overcome destructive addictions I may have.
e. I will honor quiet hours as designated by the MSC Host team. f. I will keep my personal space clean and orderly. A small additional storage unit will be provided with each shelter. Belongings that do not fit in my shelter and storage unit will be stored off - site.
g. I will participate in the operations and maintenance of our community by working scheduled hours, which may include kitchen duties, maintenance and clean up, security, toilets and hand washing stations, showers, gate monitor, etc.
h. If I have a pet, I will keep it on a leash unless supervised in the pet area, clean up waste and dispose of it properly. I will adhere to the pet policy. i. I will contribute to the cost of operations by monthly payments, by working within the MSC community, and or by supporting fundraising events. j. I will attend regular resident meetings to discuss ideas, concerns, and solutions. I will abide by decisions made.
k. I affirm that I have completed the application, background check, and intake process honestly, If additional information reveals otherwise, I could be asked to leave.
l. If this setting is not working for me, or if I have violated guidelines, arrangements for a more suitable program will be offered.

Resident Signature:_____________________________ Date:____________________ MSC Staff Signature:____________________________ Date:____________________ 44 Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX H: GRIEVANCE DOCUMENT (REF: #8)
Persons wishing to submit a formal complaint or grievance against a resident, staff - person, or volunteer of the Micro - Shelter Community should complete and submit the bottom half of this form to the Host Entity Team Chairperson via one of the following methods:
● Email:______________________________________________________ ● Postal Mail:__________________________________________________ ● Drop - off at the Host Entity Office:________________________________ Upon receipt of your grievance, the Host Entity Team will review the documents related to your complaint. If warranted, you and other involved parties will be asked to speak to the Host Entity Team to answer any questions they might have. After discussion, the Host Entity Team will determine whether disciplinary action is warranted and how to proceed. You may be asked to participate in mediation. A written response to your complaint form will be returned to you within 48 hours of the Host Entity Team meeting.

If you have questions regarding this grievance form or the complaint procedure, please contact your Case Manager or the Host Entity Team Chairperson. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MSC Notice of Written Complaint or Grievance
Name of Person Filing Complaint:___________________________________________ Name of Person Against Whom Complaint is Being Filed:________________________ Name(s) of Other Involved Individual(s):______________________________________ Please describe your complaint:____________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ Please describe previous steps you’ve taken to address this concern:_______________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 45 Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX I: GRIEVANCE NOTICE (REF: #8)

NOTICE TO ALL MSC RESIDENTS

APPEAL AND GRIEVANCE POLICY

1. In cases of admissions denial, involuntary exit , and disciplinary actions, all residents have the right to present their case before a neutral decision - making individual or body, up to and including the Host Entity Team.

2. When requested, residents have the right to have an advocate present during the appeal or grievance process. Reasonable efforts will be made to coordinate with a residents advocates in order to schedule meetings when the residents advocate of choice is available.

3. The Host Entity Team must respond in writing to any written appeal or complaint within 48 hours of the Host Entity Team meeting in which a decision is made.

4. Residents who are involuntarily exited from the MSC have the right to stay in the MSC until the appeal process is completed unless the residents continued presence in the MSC poses a risk to the health and safety of other residents and or staff.

5. Applicants and residents have the right to appeal admissions denials for cause, involuntary exit decisions, and disciplinary actions.

6. Any subsequent appeals processes beyond appeal to the Host Entity Team as provided by funding agencies or other partner organizations will be added to this notice when available.
46 Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX J: EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN (REF: #9)
The following information must be posted in a public area in the MSC and reviewed at least monthly at MSC Resident Council meetings and with new residents upon intake.

1. Fire extinguishers and emergency evacuation routes from the MSC are clearly marked on the MSC Emergency Evacuation Map, which accompanies this notice.

2. In the event of an emergency evacuation of the MSC, all residents will leave the MSC and gather immediately in the parking lot of the RABA station at the front of St. James Lutheran Church to be accounted for and assisted by first responders as needed. If the situation requires evacuation to a further distance, the gathering location will be the parking lot of the Chevron north of Rt. 44 on Shasta View Dr.

3. Residents are encouraged to keep a “go bag” with items such as bottled water, flashlight, whistle, personal hygiene products, prescription medication or a list of prescriptions, a cell phone charger, basic emergency pet supplies, copies of vital records, and first aid supplies. This bag should be prepared at all times in case of an emergency evacuation from the MSC. Residents may request assistance from the MSC Safety Committee in preparing a bag.

4. The highest - ranking volunteer on site at the MSC at the time of an emergency will be considered the leader of the emergency response until a higher - ranking volunteer or staff person arrives. If no staff person is on site at the time of the emergency, the chairperson of the MSC Resident Council will take the leadership role. This leader is responsible for gathering all evacuees, calling 9 - 1 - 1 if needed, and assessing and responding to injuries of any residents or volunteers until help arrives. Residents interested in training for basic emergency response will be supported in this effort.

5. The MSC will install and maintain signage indicating the direction of exits from the gated MSC area.

6. The MSC Safety Committee will conduct one fire - drill and one shelter - in - place exercise on, at minimum, a bi - monthly basis. These drills should include all current residents of the MSC and several volunteers or staff members on a rotating basis.

7. The Host Entity Team or its designee will maintain an updated list of current residents’ names, phone numbers, potential emergency support needs, and pet names and types for use in an emergency. Copies of this list, along with an accurate map of the MSC, will be kept in a secure but accessible location for reference during an emergency response.

8. At least one resident should be trained in locating and turning off utilities in the event of an emergency, especially gas or propane lines, if any.

9. In the event of a large - scale emergency like an earthquake, all residents will attempt to contact their Case Manager or Program Manager on - call to report their safety status and location.
47 Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX K: PET OWNERSHIP AGREEMENT (REF: #12)
Micro - Shelter Community Pet Ownership Agreement
Pet ownership is often an important part of the development of social and economic mobility for individuals who have previously experienced homelessness. This MSC makes reasonable accommodations for pet owners who reside at the MSC. Upon intake, residents with pets must review and sign the following agreement. Current residents will typically be prohibited from adopting new pets after intake, but exceptions can be made in consultation with case managers, lead advocates, and the Resident Council.

The MSC will:
● Provide safe and clean drinking water at the MSC.
● Assist the resident in meeting licensing, vaccinating, and spay/neuter requirements as needed.
● Monitor the behavior of pets to ensure the safety of all residents and staff.

The pet owner will:
● Agree to have only one pet.
● Care for the basic needs of the pet, including the provision of adequate water, food, and shelter.
● Administer all regular medications to their pet.
● Pursue licensing, vaccinations, and spaying/neutering of their pets as needed. ● Handle or touch only their pets unless given permission by the owner. ● Leash or kennel their pet at all times unless in an enclosed pet area. ● Report any incidents involving aggressive animals, including their own, to the Host Entity Team.
● Pursue proper training of pet in order to avoid removal of the pet due to excessive nuisance or danger to others. Owners are responsible for preventing their pet from trespassing in other resident’s private space, excessive noise - making, and other sources of nuisance.
● Place the pet into the care and supervision of another willing resident or staff person when the resident is off - site without the pet. ● Clean up all solid waste from their pet and properly dispose of it. ● Abide by any decisions made by the Host Entity Team to remove the pet from the MSC due to chronic aggressive behavior, nuisance or pet owners not following the pet policy.

I have reviewed and agree to abide by these regulations regarding my pet.

Signature of Resident/Owner:______________________________________________ Name of Pet:___________________________________________________________ 48 Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX L: NOTICE OF PRIVACY PRACTICES (REF: 5.I.i)
This notice describes how information about you may be used and disclosed and how you can get access to this information. Please review it carefully.

Your information is personal, and the MSC team is committed to protecting it. Your information is also very important to our ability to provide you with quality services and to comply with certain laws.

How we may use and disclose your information:
● MSC partners and agencies may use or disclose your information to other personnel of the MSC or its partner agencies in order to coordinate your care. ● We may use and disclose your information to recommend service options or alternatives that may be of interest to you.
● We will use and disclose information when required by federal, state, or local law or regulation.
● We may use and disclose your information when necessary to prevent a serious threat to your health and safety or the health and safety of the public or another person. This could include disclosure of your information to the appropriate governing authority if we believe you have been the victim or perpetrator of abuse, neglect, or domestic violence if such disclosure is required by law.

Your rights regarding your information:
● You have the right to inspect and obtain copies of your information from our records. If you feel that your information is incorrect or incomplete, you may submit a written request to your case manager. This request will become part of your record.
● You have the right to request additional restrictions when disclosing your information. This request must be made in writing and include what information you want to limit, the type of limitation, and to whom you want the limitation to apply. Reasonable effort to accommodate these requests will be made as allowed by federal, state, and local law and the policies and procedures of the MSC.

Your responsibilities:
● You agree to keep private any information you overhear in or around the MSC related to another resident’s health diagnosis, concerns, or complications, substance use issues, mental health concerns, family concerns, etc. ● You agree to share information with your case manager and Lead Advocate that is pertinent to your care, recovery process, and the goals you have set for yourself.

I acknowledge that I have received and reviewed this Notice of Privacy Practices and agree to abide by it.

Resident Signature:________________________________ Date:_________________ 49 Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX M: ABUSE REPORTING DOCUMENT (REF: #8.B)
Part of living in community is helping to keep each other safe and hold each other accountable for appropriate behavior and treatment of others. If you have witnessed or suspect that an MSC resident, staff person, or volunteer has been the victim of perpetrator of sexual, emotional, or verbal abuse, please complete this document and submit it to the Host Entity Team Chairperson via one of the following methods:
● Email:___________________________________________________________ ● Postal Mail:_______________________________________________________ ● Drop - off at the Host Entity Office:____________________________________ Please note that any adult caregivers to elderly persons are considered Mandated Reporters in the state of California and are therefore required by law to report any witnessed or suspicion of abuse.

If you have questions regarding this abuse reporting form or your legal obligations, please contact your Case Manager or the Host Entity Team Chairperson. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MSC Report of Suspected or Known Abuse of or by a Resident, Staff - person, or Volunteer
Name of Person Filing Report:_____________________________________________ Name(s) of Suspected /Known Victim(s) if known:______________________________ Name(s) of Suspected/Known Perpetrator(s) if known:___________________________ Please describe the incident:_______________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________ 50 Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX N: MSC DRUG/ALCOHOL AGREEMENT (REF: #14.B)
In order for residents to begin their transition to permanent housing, alcohol and illegal drugs will not be allowed on - site at MSCs. Upon intake, new residents must review and sign the following agreement:
● Residents will not smoke indoors or within 20 feet of MSC facilities. A designated smoking area and disposal receptacle will be provided.
● Residents may not possess, use, or distribute alcohol or illegal drugs on the MSC premises. If alcohol or drugs are found, the resident will be given the opportunity to dispose of the prohibited substance. A single violation of this policy cannot be a reason for involuntary exit unless the violation compromises the health or safety of other residents or staff. Multiple violations of this policy may be used as grounds for involuntary exit.
● Residents returning to the MSC under the influence of alcohol or illegal drugs will not be subject to disciplinary action as long as they do not disrupt the community.

Residents will be encouraged to participate in drug/alcohol rehab programs as part of their recovery plan.
● Admission, exit, and service restriction policies must not be based on substance use or possession alone unless as noted above for multiple violations. ● Drug testing of residents is prohibited unless the testing is part of an agreed upon treatment plan with the resident. Submission to drug testing cannot be a requirement for residency, and refusal to participate in drug testing cannot be the basis for involuntary exit.
● Noncompliance with treatment or containment measures that endangers other residents may be cause for exit.
● Residents who are under the care of a licensed physician and have been prescribed controlled substances must notify the MSC Host Entity Team of their possession of these drugs and are responsible to securely lock these substances in their private storage at all times to prevent theft. Illegal sharing of controlled substances with other residents could be grounds for involuntary exit.

I have reviewed the above policies and had the opportunity to discuss and ask questions about it. I understand the policies and agree to abide by them during my time as a resident of the MSC.

Resident Name:_________________________________________________________ Resident Signature:______________________________________________________ Signature of Intake Official:________________________________________________ Date:___________________________
51 Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX O: HOUSEKEEPING AND MAINTENANCE PLAN (REF: #9.N) MSC HOUSEKEEPING PLAN, WEEK OF MAY 14

TASK ASSIGNED PERSON COMPLETION INITIALS
Daily Restroom Check:
check for toilet paper,
check for cleanliness of
toilet, check and replenish
paper supplies, clean toilet
seat as needed
Monday_____
Tuesday_____
Wednesday_____
Thursday_____
Friday_____
Saturday_____
Sunday_____
Bi-Weekly Kitchen
Clean-up: scour sink, wipe
and sanitize counters and
tables, notify residents of
expired food in fridge, wipe
inside and outside of
microwave, sweep
common area floors
Monday_____
Thursday_____
Property and Garden Care:

Pick up any loose trash on
the ground inside or
outside the fenced MSC,
empty common trash cans
into dumpster, water
shared garden areas, wipe
debris from park benches,
sweep outdoor pathways
Monday_____
Thursday_____
Saturday_____

MSC MAINTENANCE PLAN, MONTH OF JULY

TASK ASSIGNED PERSON COMPLETION INITIALS
52 Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) Bi-Monthly Safety Check:
visual inspection of
electrical outlets and
lighting in common areas,
visual inspection of gate
function and exterior fence
integrity, check for
presence and function of
emergency materials in the
emergency area(including
cell phones, emergency
phone numbers, fire
extinguisher, evacuation
plan, etc.)
1st week of the month____
3rd week of the month____
Evacuation Drill One time per month_____
Monthly Facility Check:
visual inspection of
facilities and grounds
looking for decay, pests,
and repair needs
One time per month_____5
3 Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) APPENDIX P: DONATED FOOD SAFETY STANDARDS AGREEMENT (REF: #10.B) Thank you for your willingness to support our Micro - Shelter Community with donations of prepared food! In order to ensure the safety of the food provided to our residents and other participants, we ask that you review and sign the following food preparation guidelines:

1. Ensure food preparation surfaces, dishes, and utensils are clean and in good condition.

2. Check supplies to ensure food is packaged safely, at the correct temperature, not expired, and is clean and undamaged.

3. Ensure that raw and ready to eat foods are stored and handled separately. Raw meat , poultry, and fish should be stored below ready to eat food in a clearly distinguishable part of the refrigerator and in covered containers. Do not reuse plates or containers that have held raw meat.

4. Make sure food is cooked and prepared properly and is kept covered to help prevent contamination. Beef, veal, lamb, roasts, and chops should be cooked to 145 degrees F. Pork and ground beef should be cooked to 160 degrees F.

Poultry should reach a safe minimum internal temperature of 165 degrees F.

5. Use good hygiene when preparing and serving food. Wash hands, use gloves, secure jewelry, and cover or pull back hair.

6. Provide notification to MSC leaders of the presence of any common allergens in dishes you donate.

7. Ensure that hot food is kept at at least 140 degrees F and cold food is kept at approximately 40 degrees F. No food should be left at room temperature for more than two hours. Food left out for more than two hours should be discarded.

I, ____________________________________________________, have read and reviewed these food safety standards and agree to abide by them for the safety of the participants in our Micro - Shelter Community.

Signature:________________________________________ Date:_________________ Phone Number:_________________________ Email:___________________________ 54 Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Emergency Housing Site Operations and Services Manual (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 1

CITY OF REDDING

CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding (“City”), a municipal corporation, and United Way of Northern California (“Consultant”) for the purpose of operating the Emergency Housing Site (“EHS”) located at 3211 Mark Street, Redding, California.

WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:

SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.

SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed $150,000. This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice.

C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.

SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work in early 2023. Pursuant to Ordinance 2637, the term of any EHS is limited to one year and may be considered for renewal by notifying the City Manager in writing 90-days prior to the one-year term expiration. The oneyear term will be based on the first day of operation as deemed by the City Manager.

B. If Consultant fails to perform its duties to the satisfaction of City, or if consultant fails to fulfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Contract, Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Consulting and Professional Services Contract_draft (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 2
then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon City giving written notice thereof to Consultant.

C. Either Party may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the term set forth in Section 3.A. of this Contract exceeds ninety (90) calendar days in duration, Consultant’s sole right to terminate shall be limited to termination for cause.

D. Consultant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City’s funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the project and/or work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of its intention to terminate. In the event of a termination pursuant to this subdivision, Consultant shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.

E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.

F. In the event that City terminates the Contract, City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Contract; provided, however, that City shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits which might have been made by Consultant had Consultant completed the services required by this Contract. Consultant shall, not later than ten (10) calendar days after termination of this Contract by City, furnish to City such financial information as in the judgment of the City’s representative is necessary to determine the reasonable value of the services rendered by Consultant.

G. In no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party’s failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.

SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT A. City shall make its facilities accessible to Consultant as required for Consultant’s performance of its services under this Contract, and, upon request of Consultant, provide labor and safety equipment as required by Consultant for such access.

Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Consulting and Professional Services Contract_draft (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 3
B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.

C. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Contract any licenses, permits and approvals that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.

D. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Contract, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Contract is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/employee relationship, association, joint venture relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs under this Contract. Any and all taxes imposed on Consultant’s income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Contract or its performance, including but not limited to sales or use taxes, shall be paid by Consultant. Consultant shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Consultant is an employee of City. Consultant shall not be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.

E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.

F. No portion of the work or services to be performed under this Contract shall be assigned, transferred, conveyed or subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant may use the services of independent contractors and subcontractors to perform a portion of its obligations under this Contract with the prior written approval of City. Independent contractors and subcontractors shall be provided with a copy of this Contract and Consultant shall have an affirmative duty to assure that said independent contractors and subcontractors comply with the same and agree to be bound by its terms. Consultant shall be the responsible party with respect to all actions of its independent contractors and subcontractors, and shall obtain such insurance and indemnity provisions from its contractors and subcontractors as City’s Risk Manager shall determine to be necessary.

G. Consultant shall furnish City with quarterly reports pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Contract, the costs or obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Contract.

H. Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by City to assure proper accounting for all project funds. These records shall be made available for audit Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Consulting and Professional Services Contract_draft (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 4
purposes to state and federal authorities, or any authorized representative of City.

Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.

I. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Contract in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of Consultant’s profession. All products of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Contract shall be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing the profession of Consultant and its agents, employees and subcontractors assigned to perform the services contemplated by this Contract.

J. All completed reports and other data or documents, or computer media including diskettes, and other materials provided or prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Contract are the property of City, and may be used by City. City shall have all intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, copyright and patent rights, in said documents, computer media, and other materials provided by Consultant. City shall release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, costs, expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.

K. Consultant, including its employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Contract. Consultant shall comply with all requirements of the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 8100 et seq.) and other laws relating to conflicts of interest, including the following: 1) Consultant shall not make or participate in a decision made by City if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision may have a material effect on Consultant’s economic interest, and 2) if required by the City Attorney, Consultant shall file financial disclosure forms with the City Clerk.

SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:

Coverage Required Not Required
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability X
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) X
Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: Consulting and Professional Services Contract_draft (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 5
B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office form number CG-0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;

2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;

3. Statutory Workers’ Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers’ Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.

5. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording “but only in the event of a named insured’s sole negligence” or any other verbiage limiting the insured’s insurance responsibility.

C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant; premises owned, leased or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant.

The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

2. The insurance coverage of Consultant shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: Consulting and Professional Services Contract_draft (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 6
insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Consultant shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Consultant agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice has been given to City.

E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.

F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.

G. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant as required by Section 5 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Consultant pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.

H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a “claims made” policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945.6, Consultant shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination of this Contract.

I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall immediately notify City’s Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225-4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Consultant shall submit a written report to City’s Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: Consulting and Professional Services Contract_draft (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 7
of Consultant’s insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.

SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2782.8, when the services to be provided under this Contract are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under Section 2782.8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

C. The Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s inability to evaluate liability. The Consultant shall respond within thirty (30) calendar days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City.

If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered to City within thirty (30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Consultant herein.

D. The obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: Consulting and Professional Services Contract_draft (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 8
are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.

E. City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Consultant pursuant to this Section to represent City’s interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.

SECTION 7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES A. This Contract shall be deemed to have been entered into in Redding, California. All questions regarding the validity, interpretation or performance of any of its terms or of any rights or obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be governed by California law. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.

C. No covenant or condition to be performed by Consultant under this Contract can be waived except by the written consent of City. Forbearance or indulgence by City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of the covenant or condition in question. Until performance by Consultant of said covenant or condition is complete, City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to City under this Contract or by law or in equity despite said forbearance or indulgence.

D. If any portion of this Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.

E. The headings in this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof. A waiver of any party of any provision or a breach of this Contract must be provided in writing, and shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provisions herein.

F. Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Contract, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: Consulting and Professional Services Contract_draft (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 9
and represents that this Contract is made without reliance upon any statement or representation not contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Contract and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Contract is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code § 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.

G. Each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.

H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.

SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.

SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.

B. In the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or non-membership in any organization. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or non-membership in any organization. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.

Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: Consulting and Professional Services Contract_draft (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 10
SECTION 10. REPRESENTATIVES
A. City’s representative for this Contract is Nicole Smith, telephone number (530) 225- 4336, fax number (530) 225-4126. All of Consultant’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person, or to the representative's designee.

B. Consultant’s representative for this Contract is Larry Olmstead, United Way of Northern California President and CEO, telephone number (530) 241-7521, fax number (530) 241-7521. All of City’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person.

C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.

SECTION 11. NOTICES
A. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be deemed given only if in writing signed by an authorized representative of the sender (may be other than the representatives referred to in Section 10) and delivered by facsimile, with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:

To City:
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:
3300 Churn Creek Road
Redding, CA 96002
B. Either party may change its address for the purposes of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.

C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.

SECTION 12. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT
A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective parties to this Contract; that they have full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Contract; and that the execution, performance and delivery of this Contract by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Contract.

Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: Consulting and Professional Services Contract_draft (9.2(d)--Mark Street Emergency Housing Site) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 11
B. When the Mayor is signatory to this Contract, the City Manager and/or the Department Director having direct responsibility for managing the services provided herein shall have authority to execute any amendment to this Contract which does not increase the amount of compensation allowable to Consultant or otherwise substantially change the scope of the services provided herein.

SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Contract on the days and year set forth below:

CITY OF REDDING,
A Municipal Corporation
Dated: ___________, 20____ __________________________________ By:

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

BARRY E. DeWALT
City Attorney
__________________________________ ___________________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk By: