Redding City Council
September 19, 2023

Agenda
Regular Meeting
Redding City Council
Council Chambers (Doors open 30 minutes prior)
777 Cypress Avenue,
Redding, CA
September 19, 2023
6:00 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER - MAYOR MICHAEL DACQUISTO
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation - Pastor Brien Walters, Cottonwood Assembly of God C. Roll Call

2. PRESENTATIONS
2A. Presentation of the Shasta Mosquito and Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report by Peter Bonkrude, District Manager.
2B. Visit Redding presentation by Danny Orloff, Tourism Marketing Director, providing a quarterly report regarding tourism marketing and promotion efforts for the City of Redding.

If anyone wishes to address the City Council on any item considered at this meeting before or during Council’s consideration of that item, please fill out a blue Speaker Request Form, located in the lighted alcoves at the back of the Council Chambers, and submit it to the City Clerk. The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for each agenda item. Staff reports are available on-line at the City’s web site at www.cityofredding.org or in the Public View binder located on the podium at the north side of the Chambers.

PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES. THANK YOU.

Redding City Council September 19, 2023

3. PUBLIC COMMENT - for non-agendized matters within the city’s jurisdiction.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains items considered routine and/or which have been individually scrutinized by City Council Members and are anticipated to require no further deliberation. If a member of the public wishes to address an item on the Consent Calendar, please fill out a Speaker Request Form and submit it to the City Clerk before the Consent Calendar is considered. It shall be the prerogative of any Council Member, before the Consent Calendar is acted upon, to: (1) comment on an item; (2) respond to any public comment on an item; (3) request the record reflect an abstention or nay vote on an item; or (4) remove an item and place it on the Regular portion of the agenda for delivery of a staff report and/or an extended discussion or deliberation.

4.1(a). Accept the report regarding use of the California Correctional Center (Susanville Correctional Facility) with no further action required.

4.2(a). Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Adopt Resolution approving the City of Redding to apply for the Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Designation through the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development;
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign and submit the application, and execute all necessary documents related to Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing funding opportunities; and (3) Find that applying for, and accepting, a Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Designation is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

4.2(b). Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the submission of a Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods grant program application in an amount not to exceed $750,000 for planning funds for the Martin Luther King, Jr. Neighborhood; (2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the grant application and all applicable documents to complete the application process and if awarded the grant, accept and appropriate the funds accordingly; (3) Find that acting in an administrative capacity is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
(4) Find that acting in an administrative capacity is an exempt activity under the National Environmental Policy Act.

PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT, CITY COUNCIL CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON PUBLIC

COMMENT ITEMS
The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for 30 minutes total, at the beginning of the meeting for Public Comment for non-agendized matters within the City’s jurisdiction.

The Mayor will determine the order of the speakers. If 30 minutes is not adequate to accommodate all of the individuals who have submitted a Speaker Request Form to the City Clerk, the Council will trail this item to the end of the open session agenda. The remaining speakers will address the City Council at that time.

Redding City Council September 19, 2023

4.6(a). Approve the Third Amendment to the Land and Building Lease Agreement (C7786) with the Economic Development Corporation of Shasta County for City of Redding (City)-owned property located at 777 Auditorium Drive, to exercise the last of three, one-year options extending the lease term from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024, for the monthly lease payment to the City in the amount of $3,142.53.

4.8(a). Approve and authorize the following actions:
(1) Approve the month-to-month lease with Shield Regional Training Consortium in the amount of $241.50 per month for one office space located at 4300 Caterpillar Road for the Fire Department's Battalion Chief of Training; and
(2) Authorize the Redding Fire Department’s Chief to execute the lease and any other documents to complete the transaction.

4.8(b). Approve donation of the Redding Fire Department’s obsolete Kenwood mobile radios and Minitor pagers valued at approximately $5,300 to regional fire departments.

4.9(a). Authorize and ratify the submission of an application to the U.S. Department of Justice 2023 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program in the amount of $49,198 to fund the purchase of tactical rifles and slings; and authorize the City Manager to sign the grant application's certifications and assurances signifying that the governing body was notified of the application and citizens were provided the opportunity to comment on the application.

4.11(a). Authorize and approve the following actions:
(1) Accept grant funds from the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) on behalf of Centerville Community Services District (CCSD); (2) Approve the HMGP Project Agreement with CCSD for the Muletown Pump Station Generator Project;
(3) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 12th Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $350,000 for the Centerville Generator Project, $225,000 in federal grant funding and $125,000 in local match funds from Redding Electric Utility; and (4) Find that the action is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15061(b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption.

4.11(b). Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals No. 5385, to provide engineering and environmental services for the Churn Creek Road, Victor Avenue, and Rancho Road Roundabout Project:
(1) Award the Consultant and Professional Services Contract to Dokken Engineering Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,243,029; (2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the contract with Dokken Engineering; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $50,000.

Redding City Council September 19, 2023

4.11(c). Accept update regarding the City of Redding’s COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package projects.

4.11(d). Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Approve the City of Redding (City) as applicant for a Service National Fish Passage Program Base Funding Grant, administered by the U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service, requesting up to $2 million with up to a 30 percent local match;
(2) Approve the City as applicant for a Water Supply for Environmental Flows (Stream Flow Enhancement Program) Grant, administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board requesting up to $5 million with up to a 30 percent local match;
(3) Approve the City as applicant for a Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant, under Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act, administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, requesting up to $25 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (4) Approve the City as applicant for a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund grant, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting up to $40 million with no local match;
(5) Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application to the State Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Fund for the project and authorizing the Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director to sign and file necessary applications and amendments thereto on behalf of the City of Redding; and
(6) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the above grants, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant(s) be awarded.

4.11(e). Authorize and approve the following actions regarding allocation of an awarded federal grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Program and regional non-motorized grant funds for the following project:
(1) Accept the funds in the amount of $240,000 for the Local Road Safety Plan Update; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 13th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $240,000 for the project.

4.11(f). Approve increases to the project budget in the amount of $475,280 for the completion of Bid Schedule No. 5263, Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements Project as outlined below for additional improvements:
(1) Increase of $325,280 to the construction management budget, bringing the construction management total to $1,381,280; and
(2) Increase of $150,000 to the construction contingency budget, bringing the construction contingency total to $780,000; and
(3) Authorize Staff to negotiate and the City Manager to execute an Amendment to the Consulting and Professional Services Agreement with Ghiradelli Associates to increase the fee for construction management and inspection services in an amount not to exceed $200,000.

Redding City Council September 19, 2023

4.11(g). Authorize the following actions relative to a proposal to provide engineering services for Instrumentation, Control, Programming, and Electrical Design Services for the City of Redding Water Utility:
(1) Award a Consulting and Professional Services Contract to TJC and Associates, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $155,000;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Contract and approve future contract amendments up to $30,000; and
(3) Find that contract approval is not a project defined by the California Environmental Quality Act.

4.11(h). Authorize the following actions relative to the sole-source procurement of Solid Waste Collection Vehicle refurbishment services for five existing units in the City of Redding Solid Waste Utility:
(1) Approve the sole-source procurement to Terrific Trucks & Equipment using Rolling Stock Funds in an amount not to exceed $910,000; and (2) Find that the action is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15301 – Existing Facilities.

RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT, ACKNOWLEDGE, ADOPT, APPROVE,
AND/OR AUTHORIZE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

9. REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES
City Manager

9.1(b). Consider accepting report regarding submission of letter to the Shasta County Board of Supervisors regarding the County Elections ballot counting process.

Recommendation:

Accept the report and provide direction to staff regarding submission of a letter to the Shasta County Board of Supervisors regarding the County Elections ballot counting process.

Redding City Council September 19, 2023

Assistant City Manager

9.2(c). Consider authorizing the City of Redding to serve as the NorCal Continuum of Care's Administrative Entity.

Recommendation:

Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the City of Redding to serve as the interim Administrative Entity for the NorCal Continuum of Care for a two-year term;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate and sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the NorCal Continuum of Care’s Executive Board outlining the respective roles and responsibilities of the City of Redding as the NorCal Continuum of Care’s Administrative Entity;
(3) Authorize the City Manager to submit applications or documents necessary to apply to the State of California for the Homeless Housing Assistance and Prevention grant, or other grants that become available on behalf of the NorCal Continuum of Care, and appropriate funds received; (4) Find that acting in an administrative capacity is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
(5) Find that acting in an administrative capacity is an exempt activity under the National Environmental Policy Act.

Electric Utility

9.5(a). Consider Redding Electric Utility's Fiscal Year 2022-23 Financial Report, Industry Activities Update, and Power Content Label.

Recommendation:

Accept Redding Electric Utility’s Fiscal Year 2022-23 Financial Report, Industry Activities Update, and Power Content Label.

9.5(b). Consider oral update regarding status of Redding Electric Utility resources.

Recommendation:

Accept an oral update regarding the status of Redding Electric Utility’s resources, including recommendations regarding potential participation in a Carbon Capture Sequestration project, Senate Bill 100, the 2024 Integrated Resource Plan, and the California Independent System Operator’s Extended Day Ahead Market.

Redding City Council September 19, 2023

Community Services

9.6(b). Oral report regarding the 2023 Community Creek Clean-Up to be held on October 7, 2023.

Recommendation:

Accept oral report regarding the 2023 Community Creek Clean-Up to be held on October 7, 2023, on the Sacramento River Trail, 975 North Market Street, Redding.

Electric Utility

9.10(a). Consider City of Redding Year End Budget Review for Fiscal Year Ending 2023 and Resolution approving adjustments.

Recommendation:

Accept the Year End Budget Report for the City of Redding; and adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 96th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021- 078 increasing appropriations by $4,429,640 for Fiscal Year 2022-23.

Public Works

9.11(i). Consider Ordinance to update Redding Municipal Code Title 9 (Health and Safety) Chapter 9.28 (Solid Waste and Recycling).

Recommendation:

Authorize and approve the following actions to comply with state mandated legislation for the City of Redding Solid Waste Utility:
(1) Offer Ordinance amending Redding Municipal Code Title 9 (Health and Safety), Chapter 9.28 (Solid Waste and Recycling), by amending Section

9.28.010 (Definitions) and adding Section 9.28.275 (Commercial Edible Food Generators) for first reading by title only, waive the full reading; (2) Find that the passage of this ordinance is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (“Common Sense Exemption”) because it can be seen with certainty that passage of the ordinance will not have a significant effect on the environment; and
(3) Authorize the City Attorney to prepare and the City Clerk to publish a summary ordinance according to law.

Redding City Council September 19, 2023

City Attorney

9.14(a). Consider Design Immunity Ordinance relative to the City Engineer's existing authority.

Recommendation:

Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Offer Ordinance amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2 (Administration and Personnel), Chapter 2.28 (City Engineer), by adding Section 2.28.060 (Approval of Plans, Specifications and Designs) for first reading by title only and waive the full reading;
(2) Authorize the City Attorney to prepare a summary ordinance and the City Clerk to publish the same in accordance with law; and
(3) Find that adoption of the proposed ordinance is not a “project” within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act.

11. COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
[A-050-060]
Information Only

12. SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS

FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

13. ADJOURNMENT
Redding City Council September 19, 2023

Pursuant to the Brown Act, non-confidential materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Office of the City Clerk, 3rd Floor, City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.

City Council Meetings will be televised live on Shasta Community Access Channels via Charter/Spectrum Cable channel 181, and will be rerun on Thursday at 12:30 p.m. during the week in which the meeting is held. Additionally, the meeting can be viewed online at the following: http://scac.cablecast.tv:8080/CablecastPublicSite/watch/4?channel=1. Video of the City Council meetings can also be viewed on the City’s web site at http://www.cityofredding.org/. Open the City’s meetings and agendas portal; Click on tab named "Meetings Videos" and select Redding City Council under “Available Archives 2023” select the desired date, then click on “video” to view the meeting.

In compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Redding will make available to persons with disabilities modifications or accommodations including auxiliary aids or services necessary to participate in public meetings. A person needing assistance should contact the Redding City Clerk by telephone at (530) 225-4447 or in person, or by mail at 777 Cypress Avenue, 3rd Floor, Redding, California 96001 at least three (3) working days in advance.

The City of Redding will ensure that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any of its projects, activities, services, or business opportunities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, as afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes as amended. All persons, regardless of their citizenship status, are covered under this regulation.

Questions, complaints, or requests for accommodations or additional information may be forwarded to the ADA & Title VI Coordinator at 777 Cypress Avenue, Attn: Personnel Dept., Redding, California 96001, Phone (530) 225-4065.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Presentation of the Shasta Mosquito and Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report by Peter Bonkrude, District Manager.

Attachments
^2022 Annual Report
MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 2A
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito and Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report.

Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 10
Protecting public health since 1919

ANNUAL REPORT
2022
Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report) On behalf of the Shasta Mosquito and Vector Control District (SMVCD) Board of Trustees and staff, I am pleased to present the 2022 Annual Report. The SMVCD annual report is a testament to our organization’s unyielding dedication to public health and our commitment to excellence. It highlights the progress made in expanding our knowledge base through research and innovation, adopting advanced technologies, and embracing sustainable practices that ensure the preservation of our environment.

This year we experienced an unprecedented drought resulting in something we’ve never witnessed in our 103 years as an agency, the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District canal remained dry throughout the entire season and had no irrigation allocations throughout the District area. This development provided the District with a strange season with minimal activity in areas where agricultural operations often keep our staff busy throughout the mosquito months.

In addition to the unusual year, we continued to see increases in both abundance and distribution of our invasive species, Aedes aegypti, and to a lesser degree, Aedes albopictus. The District continues to be challenged, redirecting resources to the invasive species prevention program in an effort to eliminate these non-native populations. In 2023 we will reassess the invasive species program providing new direction to better manage potential risks associated with this increase in abundance.

In the pages that follow, you will find a detailed account of the initiatives, strategies, and outcomes that have defined our endeavors over the past year. Our dedicated staff, equipped with their expertise and relentless commitment, have implemented robust surveillance programs to monitor vector populations, identify potential breeding sites, and implement targeted control measures. I extend my deepest appreciation to the staff of the Shasta Mosquito and Vector Control District for their tireless dedication, as well as to our partners and the residents of Shasta County for their ongoing cooperation. Together, we will continue to safeguard the health and well-being of our community.

Finally, we must highlight the career and contributions of John Albright, our retiring Scientific Operations Manager. John started with the District in 1997, taking on the role of Biologist and Public Information Specialist. Over time his role and responsibilities evolved to his final title of Scientific Operations Manager. John brought a philosophy of innovation, dedication and consistency that moved our surveillance and research department to new heights. Thanks to his efforts, SMVCD is well known throughout California as a top-rated mosquito district. Thank you, John, for over 25 years of service. Enjoy your next adventure!
Sincerely,
Peter Bonkrude
District Manager
Philip Cramer
President

FOREWORD
Our Mission:
“To protect the
public’s health from
vector-borne disease
and nuisance, through
a comprehensive
mosquito and vector
control program
focused on innovation,
experience and
efficiency.”
Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report) 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

FOREWORD
Message from the District Manager

DISTRICT OVERVIEW
Board & Staff
District History
Integrated Vector Management

COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION
Service Requests

IMMATURE MOSQUITO CONTROL
Physical Control
Biological Control
Chemical Control
Catch Basin Program
Swimming Pool Program

ADULT MOSQUITO CONTROL
Chemical Control

RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT
New Information & Development

VECTOR SURVEILLANCE
Tick Surveillance
Mosqiuto Surveillance

DISEASE SURVEILLANCE
Local Disease Surveillance
Invasive Aedes
State Disease Surveillance

OUTREACH
Public Education

FINANCIALS
Finance Report Breakdown
John’s Retirement
2 4
6 6
7 8
9 10
11 12
13 14
16 17
18 20
21 22
23 24
This Annual Report was made as an interdepartmental
collaboration. Special thanks to Jenna Ingebretsen,
Peter Bonkrude, Darcy Buckalew, Kendra AngelAdkinson, Garrett Hawkinson, and Mike Alexander for their many contributions.

Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

DISTRICT

HEADQUARTERS
Dave Maron
Vice President
Shasta County
Philip Cramer
President
City of Redding
Benjamin Hanna
Shasta County
Ann Morningstar
Secretary
City of Shasta Lake

BOARD OF

TRUSTEES

DISTRICT STAFF
Monty Currier
Operations Manager
Kelly Cleland
Mike Alexander
Field Supervisors
Al Shabazian
Brady Benton
Corey Boyer
Darrell Bible
Haley Bastien
Reid Sheeks
Robert Ault
Vector Technicians

OPERATIONS STAFF
Melissa Hunt
City of Anderson
4 Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

LABORATORY STAFF
John Albright
Scientific Operations Manager
Kendra Angel-Adkinson
Vector Biologist
Garrett Hawkinson
Vector Biologist

ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF
Peter Bonkrude, MS
District Manager
Darcy Buckalew
Administrative Manager
Jenna Ingebretsen
Administrative Analyst II
STAFF

HIGHLIGHTS

TOTAL YEARS

OF SERVICE
191

EMPLOYEES WITH
10-19 YEARS OF SERVICE
8 EMPLOYEES WITH
20+ YEARS OF SERVICE
3 16

FULL-TIME
STAFF

AVERAGE

YEARS OF SERVICE
12 Packet Pg. 15 5Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

INTEGRATED VECTOR

MANAGEMENT
Integrated Vector Management
(IVM) is an evidence-based, datadriven decision-making process used to help protect the citizens
of Shasta County. This strategy
attempts to suppress vectorborne diseases. This approach prioritizes surveillance of mosquito
populations, mosquito-borne
disease testing, removal of
breeding sites, public outreach
and education, and research and
quality control. IVM incorporates
various tools to target mosquitoes
at different life stages which can
include physical control, biological
control, and chemical control.

These applications rely on a range
of control interventions, separately
or in combinations, with the goal of
balancing cost and effectiveness.

Celebration of Shasta
Mosquito & Vector
Control District’s
100 years protecting
public health

DISTRICT HISTORY
Protecting public health since 1919
6 Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report) January February March April May June July August September October November December 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
Count of servicereq
SRsbyMonth/Year
YEAR
2021
2018
2019
2020
2022
The trend of count of servicereq for Servicereqdatetime Month. Color shows details about Servicereqdatetime Year. The view is filtered on Servicereqdatetime Year, which keeps 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022.

SERVICE REQUESTS
© 2023 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
1 Map based on Longitude (generated) and Latitude (generated). Color shows count of servicereq. Details are shown for Zip. The data is filtered on Servicereqdatetime, which ranges from 1/1/2022 12 00 00 AM to 12/31/2022 3 41 00 PM. 1 101
SRbyZIP
Service Requests by Zipcode

60.73%

32.49%

5.37% 1.41%

60.73%

32.49%

5.37%

1.41%
SR Reason
Adult Mosquito Issues
Neglected Swimming Pool
Neglected Pools and Mosquito Issues
Mosquito Issues and Mosquitofish
hows details about Chkdeadbird, Chkmosfish, Chknegpool and 1 more (Combined). Size shows % of Total Count of servicereq. Details are shown for ges from 1/1/2022 9 55 00 AM to 12/31/2022 12 00 00 AM. The view is filtered on Exclusions (Chkdeadbird,Chkmosfish,Chknegpool,Chkservicereq) . The Exclusions (Chkdeadbird,Chkmosfish,Chknegpool,Chkservicereq) filter keeps 11 members. The Chkdeadbird, Chkmosfish, Chknegpool and 1 more le table.

Service Requests by Type
As part of our public health
mission, District staff value and
prioritize providing responsive
and professional service to
our District residents. Service
requests serve as the first step
for some of our surveillance
efforts. During these service
requests, we can learn from
the public and hear their issues,
while sharing our knowledge
and expertise. We respond to a
variety of requests for service
including biting mosquitoes,
mosquitofish requests, neglected
swimming pool reports and
insect identification inquiries.

These requests help focus our
efforts and provide information
that is essential to our IVM
response. This year we received
405 requests for service. On
our website, the public can
issue a service request 24/7,
find information about our
current mosquito conditions
and response, and even find out
where we are performing our
adult mosquito control activities.

Grand Total 405
Anderson 63
Palo Cedro 30
Shingletown 28
City of Shasta Lake 28
Cottonwood 19
Lakehead 6
Bella Vista 6
Igo & Ono 5
Castella 4
Millville 3
Shasta 2
yCity
2 211
Service Requests
1 Redding 211
Service Requests by Community
January February March April May June July August September October November December 0 20
40 60
80 100
120
140
160
180
200
220
240
260
280
300
320
340
Count of servicereq
SRsbyMonth/Year
YEAR
2021
2018
2019
2020
2022
The trend of count of servicereq for Servicereqdatetime Month. Color shows details about Servicereqdatetime Year. The view is filtered on Servicereqdatetime Year, which keeps 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022.

Service Requests by Month, 2018-2022
Packet Pg. 17 7Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

IMMATURE MOSQUITO

CONTROL
Immature mosquito control
begins with the elimination of
mosquito larvae and pupae before
development progresses and the
mosquitoes emerge as breeding
adults. This involves physical,
biological, and chemical controls.

Sources for these efforts typically
include neglected swimming pools,
untreated water catch basins, tree
holes, seasonal creeks, residential,
agriculture, and industrial areas.

Swimming Pools
Residential
Natural
Invasive Aedes
Industrial
Agricultural Catch Basins
Vernal Pools
Inspection by Site Type
Site Type
Agricu
Catch
Indust
Invasi
Natur
Reside
Swimm
Verna
Site Type (group). Color shows details about Site Type (group). Size shows count of source_activity. The marks are labeled by Site Type (group). The data is filtered on Inspection and Material Name (group) 1. The Inspection filter ranges from 1/1/2022 3 27 00 PM to 12/31/2022 12 00 00 AM. The Material Name (group) 1 filter keeps Null, BioControl and Larval Control. The view is filtered on Site Type (group), which excludes Herbicide, Inspected 5 years ago, Treated 5 or more yrs ago, Treated Last Year and Zones.

Inspections
By Type

PHYSICAL

CONTROL
The most effective and long-lasting
approach to control mosquitoes is
the reduction of mosquito habitat.

Modification or elimination of these
habitats reduces sources that can
be exploited by mosquitoes for
production. These techniques vary
from clearing dense vegetation,
to burning cleared debris piles,
and modifying landscapes with
heavy equipment. A big part of
mosquito reduction involves the
use of heavy equipment as well as
hand dug trenches. These physical
control projects re-direct standing
water, leading to easier biological
and chemical controls by District
technicians.

Mosquito larvae, pupae, and
adults in a hatching container.
8 Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

BIOLOGICAL

CONTROL
Biological control at the District
consists of the release of
mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis).

These fish are introduced into
waters pre or post discovery
of mosquito larvae living in a
body of water. Mosquitofish are
a useful tool that is proven to
reduce or eliminate mosquitoes
from aquatic spaces. These
small-bodied, live-bearing fish
have the strong ability to live in
confined small spaces such as
animal watering troughs. These
adaptive fish benefit the District
since they can live in various water
conditions, reproduce frequently,
and produce many young. The
usual life span for mosquitofish
is relatively short and does not
cause substantial competition for
native fishes or aquatic life when
planted in appropriate habitats. The
District made 586 mosquito fish
applications in 2022.
© 2023 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
FishMap
February October 2022
MONTH
Map based on average of Lat Lng - Split 1 and average of Lat Lng - Split 2. Color shows details about Treatment Month. Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Material Name, Treatment and Material Name (group). The Material Name filter excludes Null. The Treatment filter ranges from 1/1/2022 12 00 00 AM to 12/31/2022 2 03 00 PM. The Material Name (group) filter keeps Mosquito Fish.

February October 2022
MONTH
tment Month. Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Material Name, Treatment and Material 00 AM to 12/31/2022 2 03 00 PM. The Material Name (group) filter keeps Mosquito Fish.

Fish Planted
by Month
Packet Pg. 19 9Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report) The District uses a variety of
target-specific chemical products
to reduce the number of adult
mosquitoes. The term larvicide
p
Immature Control Products
Microbials
Spinosad
Surface Oils
Juvenile Growth Inhibitor
- Split 1 and average of Lat Lng - Split 2. Color shows details about Material Name (group). Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Material Name and Treatment. The . The Treatment filter ranges from 1/1/2022 12 00 00 AM to 12/31/2022 7 33 00 AM. The view is filtered on Material Name (group), which excludes 36 members.

Immature Control Products
Microbials
Spinosad
Surface Oils
Juvenile Growth Inhibitor
ils are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Material Name and Treatment. The ew is filtered on Material Name (group), which excludes 36 members.

CHEMICAL

CONTROL
refers to any product that
specifically targets mosquitoes in
their larval stage. This is the most
common control used by District
staff. These larval chemicals target
young mosquitoes before emerging
into adulthood. Control products
include microbial products,
natural toxins, growth inhibitors
and surface oils. Having a variety
of chemical products to choose
allows technicians to treat any
habitat from large areas to small
containers. In addition, the rotation
of different chemical classes makes
larval control more efficaceous.

Before treatment, staff calculate
surface area/ volume with precisely
the right type and prescribed
amounts of material needed to
eliminate vector promoting insects.

In 2022, District staff made
2,775 applications to immature
mosquitoes. Sources treated with
chemical control products often
need to be re-inspected regularly to
ensure the product is still producing
the level of control sufficient to
prevent emerging adults.
10 Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

CATCH BASIN

PROGRAM
Catch basins, the underground
section of storm drain systems
in neighborhoods, streets, and
parking lots, are an important
habitat for the immature stages of
disease mosquitoes, Culex tarsalis
and Culex pipiens. The District has
added about 10,000 catch basins
to its records, and spends time
each season inspecting and treating
these areas. In May, our focus
was specific to catch basins that
have only been treated once in the
previous 5 years, with the more
problematic basins being treated in
August and September. A total of
nearly 1,500 basins were inspected;
of those inspected, 1,027 needed
treatments. Most of the treatments
this year were with a mosquito
growth regulator. Some catch
basins were treated with a new
product containing an extended
release pouch with the same active
ingredient which showed very
promising results, lasting from
three to five months, even in basins
where other larvicides typically
work for only 4-8 weeks.
© 2023 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
Catchbasin
Map based on average of Lat Lng - Split 1 and average of Lat Lng - Split 2. Color shows details about Material Name (group) 2. Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Treatment Month, No Treat Treatment Year. The Treatment Month filter keeps 13 of 13 members. The No Treat Flag filter keeps Treated. The Site Type (group) filter keeps Catch Basins. The Treatment Year filter keeps 2022.

Material Name
Surface Oils
Growth Regulator
Microbials
Lng - Split 2. Color shows details about Material Name (group) 2. Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Treatment Month, No Treat Flag, Site Type (group) and members. The No Treat Flag filter keeps Treated. The Site Type (group) filter keeps Catch Basins. The Treatment Year filter keeps 2022.

Catch Basins Treated
By Product
Packet Pg. 2111Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

SWIMMING POOL

PROGRAM
When a swimming pool is
unmaintained it becomes a perfect
place for mosquitoes to breed.

One pool can breed millions of
mosquitoes over the course of
a summer, if left untreated. Our
District identifies neglected
swimming pools by using public
reports, aerial imaging, and
technician inspections.

Each year, the staff inspects 100’s
of pools and treats those that have
mosquito breeding potential.

During the winter and early spring
of 2022, staff treated 79 pools.

During the summer, our District
contracted an aerial service
provider to detect neglected
swimming pools. A total of 91 pools
were treated by staff with chemical
control products and mosquito fish.
© 2023 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
Swimmingpools
Material Name
Growth Regulator
Mosquito Fish
Spinosad
Surface Oils
Map based on average of Lat Lng - Split 1 and average of Lat Lng - Split 2. Color shows details about Material Name (group). Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Site Type, Treatment and No Treat Flag. The Site Type filter keeps 6 of 37 members. The Treatment filter ranges from 1/1/2022 12 00 00 AM to 12/31/2022 12 00 00 AM. The No Treat Flag filter keeps Not Treated2 and Treated.

Material Name
Growth Regulator
Mosquito Fish
Spinosad
Surface Oils
tails about Material Name (group). Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Site Type, Treatment and No Treat Flag. The Site Type filter 31/2022 12 00 00 AM. The No Treat Flag filter keeps Not Treated2 and Treated.

Pools Treated By Product
12 Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

ADULT MOSQUITO

CONTROL
Controlling adult mosquitoes is
one of the most important tools to
reduce disease transmission when
active outbreaks are occurring.

These applications can immediately
reduce the number of biting
mosquitoes in an area thereby
lowering the risk of mosquitoborne disease transmission.

This becomes essential when
adult mosquito numbers reach
high enough levels to jeopardize
residents’ health and quality of
life. Although adult mosquito
control has its limitations, it is
still an important tool in disease
prevention. These limitations
mean the District must apply the
adult mosquito control operations
with several other IVM tools
including an aggressive immature
control program, increased
community outreach for bite
prevention, and as much mosquito
source reduction as is feasible.

No additional precautions are
required for our residents during
these control operations because
of the low application rates,
© 2023 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
AppMap-Adult
Map based on average of Lat Lng - Split 1 and average of Lat Lng - Split 2. Details are shown for Source Name. The data is filtered on Material Name and Treatment. The Material Name filter keeps 15 of 75 members. The Treatment filter ranges from 1/1/2022 12 00 00 AM to 12/31/2022 12 59 00 PM.
1 1
Adult Mosquito Control Routes
Staff perform whole
neighborhood routes in response
to adult mosquito populations
and/or disease incidents.
typically less than 3 ounces per
acre. Additionally, the size of the
droplet, the time of application
(dusk/dawn), and the knowledge
of critical habitats mitigate nontarget impacts. Our applications are made dynamically, in response
to our adult surveillance. This
could mean applications are made
the same night or next day, as
the trap data is processed. This
level of responsiveness ensures
we can move fast enough to
prevent human disease. This
year due to the drought we only
made 262 adult control routes
covering over 49,000 acres, a 33%
reduction. Residents can visit our
website: www.shastamosquito.
org to review where and when
our adult mosquito control will be
conducted, or to subscribe to our
spray notifications via email or text
message.
1 101
SRbyZIP
1 24
Packet Pg. 2313Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report) The CDC bottle bioassay allows the
District to determine if resistence
is present in a population before
the efficacy of field applications
are affected, allowing management
decisions to be made in a timely
enough manner to preserve
susceptibility to that chemical.

Bottle bioassays were developed as
a rapid, simple, and economical way
to determine if a particular adult
control active ingredient is effective
on local field collected mosquitoes.

During the bioassay, a bottle is
coated with a known amount of
insecticide called the diagnostic
dose. Mosquitoes are then placed
into the bottle and observed for a
period of time. The potential for
resistance is determined by the
percentage of mosquitoes that die.

The time that it takes for the wild
mosquitoes to die is compared to
the susceptible mosquitoes.

In 2022, the District ran
mosquitoes from two separate
locations, analyzing three different
adult control products, pyrethrum,

BOTTLE BIOASSAYS
permethrin and malathion. Samples
of Culex pipiens mosquitoes
were tested. The largest level of
potential tolerance occurred in
the pyrethrum product. However,
when cage trials are implemented
with the synergized product, we
still see adequate performance.

To effectively assess whether
resistance is impacting efficacy
of adult mosquito control, actual
formulated mosquito control
products must be also tested under
field conditions.

RESEARCH &

DEVELOPMENT
14 Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report) Cage trials are used to evaluate
not only susceptibility in a wild
mosquito population but also
product efficacy under field
conditions. Wild type mosquitoes
and lab reared mosquitoes are each
placed in separate mesh cages
which are suspended on tripod
stands. These tripods are placed
on a predetermined grid, so each
is a precise distance from the truck
and each other. After evaluating
CAGE TRIALS the weather conditions, the truck
mounted ultra-low volume fogger
applies an adulticide just as it does
during control operations. The
caged mosquitoes are exposed to
the application, and then returned
to the district grounds for staff to
monitor and assess mortality. These
trials take place over one to several
evenings every year for comparison
over time. In conjunction with
bottle bioassays, the results provide
insight into potential resistance in
local mosquito populations.

The Biogents Counter (BGC) is
an accessory device compatible
with several Biogents (BG) traps
commonly used by District staff.

The advantage of the BGC is that it
counts the number of mosquitoes
entering the trap and reports the
sum in 15-minute intervals. This
provides an incredibly precise
record of mosquito abundance at
a fine temporal scale. The common

BIOGENTS COUNTER
refrain of mosquito activity is that
they are most active ‘at dusk and
dawn’. The BGC shows activity
peaks whenever they occur- with
occasionally surprising results. From
March through October 2022, the
BGC was affixed atop a BG trap
where it monitored and reported
the trap counts to a website.
7 8 9
1 2 3
4 6
CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild
300ft
100ft

TRUCK ROUTE
Merus
100% 42%
100% 21% 100%
0% 8%
88% 56%
73% 100% 100% 100%
38% 100% 6%
100% 17%
7 8 9
1 2 3
6 CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild

TRUCK ROUTE
Perm-X 3030
100% 92%
100% 68% 100%
100% 93%
100% 90%
100% 100% 100% 100%
100% 100% 62%
100% 90%
7 8 9
1 2 3
4 6
CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild
300ft
100ft

TRUCK ROUTE
Fyfanon
7 8 9
1 2 3
4 6
CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild
300ft
100ft

TRUCK ROUTE
Merus
100% 42%
100% 21% 100%
0% 8%
88% 56%
73% 100% 100% 100%
38% 100% 6%
100% 100% 17%
81% 67% 100% 100%
0% 0%
0% 5%
100%
8%
95%
90%
0% 4% 85%
17% 0%
7 8 9
1 2 3
4 6
CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild CQ1 Wild
300ft
100ft

TRUCK ROUTE
100% 92%
100% 68% 100%
100% 93%
100% 90%
100% 100% 100% 100%
100% 100% 62%
100% 90%
Fyfanon
Packet Pg. 2515Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report) TICK

SURVEILLANCE
The District monitors tick
abundance and tick-borne
pathogens within their
populations. The western black
legged tick (Ixodes pacificus)
vectors Borrelia burgdorferi and
Borrelia miyamotoi which can
cause Lyme disease and relapsing
fever in humans. These ticks
are sampled regularly between
October and March for these
pathogens.

Ticks are collected from the
environment using a one-by-one
meter cloth attached to a dowel,
colloquially called a tick ‘flag’ due
to this construction. The cloth is
dragged over microhabitats where
ticks are likely to be, such as leaf
litter and vegetation along trails.

The flag picks up the ticks much
like a passing animal would. From
there, ticks are processed in the
District lab and submitted for
testing.

0.00 2.00

4.00 6.00

8.00 10.00

12.00 14.00

16.00 October November December January February March
2020-2022 Ticks per Hour vs Seasonal Average*
*23 Sites -- Mean Count November 2009 - March 2021
1,258
TICKS
TESTED
8 POSITIVE

SAMPLES
281
TICK

SAMPLES
TESTED
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 00
00 October November December January February March
2020-2022 Ticks per Hour vs Seasonal Average*
2020-2021
2021-2022
Mean
*23 Sites -- Mean Count November 2009 - March 2021
16 Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report) Month of Collection Date
0K
1K
2K
3K
4K
5K
6K
7K
8K
9K
10K
11K
12K
13K
14K
15K
16K
17K
18K
Num Count
Mosquitoes by week (total collected/all trap types)
Specie
Aedes aegypt
Aedes albopic
Aedes sierren
Aedes spp.

Anopheles sp
Coquillettidia
Culex pipiens
Culex spp.

Culex tarsalis
Culiseta spp.

January February March April May June July August September October November December Month of Collection DateSpecies
Aedes aegypti
Aedes albopictus
Aedes sierrensis
Aedes spp.

Anopheles spp.

Coquillettidia perturbans
Culex pipiens
Culex spp.

Culex tarsalis
Culiseta spp.

MOSQUITO

SURVEILLANCE

ADULT MOSQUITO

SURVEILLANCE
Adult surveillance is achieved by
utilizing a variety of mosquito
traps at dozens of different
locations throughout the district.

Staff identify every mosquito
captured to sex and species to
gain insight into the abundance
and composition of the mosquito
population throughout the district.

Each collection is a snapshot of
the mosquito population, and
together the collections show how
the population changes over time.

LARVAL MOSQUITO

SURVEILLANCE
Larval or immature mosquito
surveillance is always a precursor
to treatment of the source to
eliminate the mosquitoes before
they can cause harm. Immature
mosquitoes can develop in an
astonishing variety of natural
and artificial water sources. As
such, technicians must both
inspect sources which habitually
hold water and hunt for new or
temporary sources that contain
mosquitoes. This equates to
hundreds, even thousands of
individual inspections performed
by each technician each year.

Reducing mosquito populations
in their immature stages before
they emerge as adults allows
the District to be more efficient
and effective in our control
interventions. This control reduces
mosquito bites and prevents
human disease. Additionally, this
allows the technician to choose
from a greater variety of treatment
options from our Integrated Vector
Management toolbox. In 2022,
technicians made inspections to
over 19,000 potential mosquito
breeding habitats; of those, almost
3,500 sources were treated for
mosquito breeding.

Nuisance mosquito situations can
arise any time of year. Treehole
mosquitoes (Aedes sierrensis)
emerge between March and
June, vexing residents with their
abundance and persistent biting
behavior. This species drives
the majority of all requests for
service received by the District.

As the summer progresses,
large populations of Culex spp
mosquitoes emerge increasing the
risk for West Nile virus.

Invasive Aedes aegypti and Aedes
albopictus are also detected in
mid-summer and continue to be
found through early fall.

Packet Pg. 2717Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report) The District utilized
three flocks of eight sentinel
chickens each to monitor virus
transmission this year. The
sentinel chickens are confined
to their locations and blood
samples are tested twice
monthly for this purpose. This
arrangement yields a more
precise understanding of when
and where transmission occurs.

Three sentinel chickens became
infected during the surveillance
period in 2022; all positive
chickens were located in the
southern area of the District
boundaries.

Wild birds and mosquitoes
maintain West Nile virus in the
environment, passing it from
infected bird to mosquito to a
new bird in a cycle that ensures
the virus persists in the bird
population. The District monitors
this cycle to evaluate the risk
of transmission to humans.

Mosquito samples, dead birds
and sentinel chickens can all
be sampled for the presence
of West Nile and other viruses.

A positive detection in any of
these can indicate elevated
risk to the public and prompt
enhanced surveillance and
control in the area.

In 2022, the District tested
15,891 mosquitoes, submitting
582 samples for mosquito-borne
diseases. These were collected
from six different trap types
between March 8th and Oct
27th. The 582 mosquito samples
suitable for virus testing were
collected from 66 different sites
within the District’s service area.

There were 39 samples which
were positive for West Nile
virus sourced from 16 unique
locations. The earliest detection
was from a sample gathered
on June 28th and the last
September 26th.

MOSQUITO TRAP

SURVEILLANCE
POSITIVE 3 CHICKENS
Bird species react differently
to infection. Some do not
experience any poor health
effects, such as our sentinel
chickens, while others will
succumb to the virus. West
Nile virus is especially lethal
to Corvids such as crows
and magpies. Residents can
report recently dead Corvids
found around their homes and
neighborhoods. District staff
retrieve and take a sample from
the bird which is then sent to
a regional lab for testing. The
California Dead Bird Hotline
received 28 reports of dead
birds within the District’s service
area. Six of these reports were
suitable for West Nile virus
testing and one western scrub
jay collected August 28th was
positive for West Nile virus.
1 POSITIVE

DEAD BIRD

DEAD BIRD

SURVEILLANCE SENTINEL

CHICKEN

SURVEILLANCE
LOCAL

DISEASE

SURVEILLANCE
Surveillance
How is disease
detected?
18 Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report) 15,891

MOSQUITOES TESTED
39 POSITIVE

SAMPLES
582

MOSQUITOES SAMPLES
TESTED
© 2022 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
Fm mosq heat map (2)
Specie
Cu
Cu
Numbe
Map based on average of Longitude and average of Latitude. For marks layer Latitude: Color shows Females caught per trap night. Details are shown for Site Name and Site Code. For marks layer Latitude (2): Color shows details about Species. Size shows sum of Number of Records. Details are shown for Site Name and Collection Date Year. The data is filtered on Collection Date Year, Sex Condition, Trap Type, Test Status and Species. The Collection Date Year filter keeps 2022. The Sex Condition filter keeps Null, females - gravid and females - mixed. The Trap Type filter keeps CO2 and GRVD. The Test Status filter keeps Confirmed. The Species filter keeps Culex erythrothorax, Culex pipiens, Culex stigmatosoma, Culex tarsalis and Culex thriambus. The view is filtered on Females caught per trap night and Collection Date Year. The Females caught per trap night filter includes everything. The Collection Date Year filter keeps 2022.

Heatmap showing the number of mosquitoes trapped in red, layered with map of positive sample by species in blue and green. © 2022 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
Fm mosq heat map (2)
Species
Culex pipiens
Culex tarsalis
Number of Records
1 4
Map based on average of Longitude and average of Latitude. For marks layer Latitude: Color shows Females caught per trap night. Details are shown for Site Name and Site Code. For marks layer Latitude (2): Color shows details about Species. Size shows sum of Number of Records. Details are shown for Site Name and Collection Date Year. The data is filtered on Collection Date Year, Sex Condition, Trap Type, Test Status and Species. The Collection Date Year filter keeps 2022. The Sex Condition filter keeps Null, females - gravid and females - mixed. The Trap Type filter keeps CO2 and GRVD. The Test Status filter keeps Confirmed. The Species filter keeps Culex erythrothorax, Culex pipiens, Culex stigmatosoma, Culex tarsalis and Culex thriambus. The view is filtered on Females caught per trap night and Collection Date Year. The Females caught per trap night filter includes everything. The Collection Date Year filter keeps 2022.

Packet Pg. 2919Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

INVASIVE

MOSQUITOES
Invasive Aedes mosquitoes
have continued to expand their
distribution across the District
in 2022. As we settle into the
reality that Aedes aegypti and
Aedes albopictus mosquitoes are
a permanent part of our local
ecosystem, ongoing surveillance
and treatment continue. Currently,
the viruses transmitted by these
mosquitoes such as dengue fever,
chikungunya and Zika were not
reported in our District for 2022.

As we continue to collect data
on our local invasive Aedes
mosquitoes, we’re better able to
tailor and refine our surveillance
and control program. Traps
designed to target invasive
Aedes mosquitoes are deployed
throughout the district on a weekly
basis. Our wide array of control
options include deployment of
autodissemination ovitraps, the
application of larval control product
through our wide area larviciding
(WALS) technology, as well as Ultra
Low Volume (ULV) fogging.
© 2023 Mapbox © OpenStreetMap
Invasive Aedes Collections
Map based on average of Longitude and average of Latitude. Color shows details about Collection Date Year. Size shows sum of Num Count. Details are shown for Sit Num Count
1 50
100
150
179
Year of Collection Date
2022
2021
2020
Adult Invasive Mosquitoes Found
By Year
Collection Date / Month of Collection Date
2020 2021 2022
August
2020
September
2020
October
2020
November
2020
June 2021 July 2021 August
2021
September
2021
October
2021
November
2021
June 2022 July 2022 August
2022
September
2022
October
2022
November
2022
0 10
20 30
40 50
60 70
80 90
100
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
Num Count
Trap Type
BGGAT

BGPRO-SENT
BGSENT
CDCAGO
CO2
GRVD
REST

SWEEPNET
Sum of Num Count for each Collection Date Month broken down by Collection Date Year. Color shows details about Trap Type. The data is filtered on Species, which keeps Aedes aegypti. The view is filtered on Collection Date Year, which keeps 2020, 2021 and 2022.

OctoberNovember
Trap Type
BGGAT

BGPRO-SENT
BGSENT
CDCAGO
CO2
GRVD
REST

SWEEPNET
Adult Invasive Mosquitoes Found By Trap Type
Ae.albopictu
In 2022, detections occurred s
from Lake Blvd. in Redding to Ox
Yoke Rd. in Anderson and were
exclusively to the west of
Interstate 5.

Ae. aegypt
Staff placing an autodissemination
ovitrap in a resident’s yard
20 Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

STATE-WIDE

DISEASE

SURVEILLANCE
St. Louis encephalitis virus
West Nile virus
Other Mosquito-borne Diseases
Most mosquito districts throughout
California utilize a statewide
database to collect, store and
analyze vector population and West
Nile virus data. In 2022, all disease
indicators except positive dead
birds and positive counties showed
a noticeable increase over 2021.

Notably, almost 30% more positive
mosquito samples were collected.

This is likely attributed to the
theory that in years that are
warmer and drier, we often
see an increase in West
Nile virus activity.

Matching the increase in West
Nile virus, St. Louis encephalitis
virus (SLEV) also saw an increase
in mosquito samples with a 71%
increase in positive samples.

These positives were relegated to
Southern California and Central
California. SLEV was detected in
2015 after several years without
any detection of virus. Since
its reemergence, it has been
isolated at relatively low levels in
mosquitoes.

Some mosquito-borne illnesses
that have been historically recorded
in California, such as western
equine encephalomyelitis virus
(WEEV) and malaria, are reported
and monitored by the California
Department of Public Health
(CDPH). Other emerging vectorborne viruses, such as dengue, Zika, chikungunya and yellow fever,
which could become emerging
disease issues in the future are
also tracked by CDPH. Although
we experience occasional travel
associated cases of these diseases
in California, no evidence of local
transmission was detected in 2022.

Total WNV+ Mosquito Samples in
California 2022
West Nile Virus Activity in
California Counties 2022
Year-to-date
Some Larval Sources Where
Invasive Mosquitoes Were Found
Packet Pg. 3121Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

OUTREACH &

PUBLIC EDUCATION
As a key pillar in the District’s
Integrated Vector Management
approach, the District’s outreach
and public education efforts have
continued to develop, and this
year is no exception. To improve
awareness, we continue to
maintain and update our deviceresponsive District website and social media platforms, to reach our
community on a digital level. Our
seasonally designated local radio
and television PSAs continued to
roll this year, including spots geotargeted through OTT (Over-thetop) media streaming services to air our video PSAs via Roku, Amazon
Fire TV, Samsung TV, and other
streaming services.

In addition to digital outreach,
we also participated in several
community events, providing
informational booths manned
by our District staff, where we
distributed a wide variety of
educational materials. These events
also provide opportunities for
our constituents to have one-onone conversations with staff and learn about our District programs.

Some community events, such
as the STEM Career Fair, was
both a virtual format as well as
an in-person event at the Shasta
Fairgrounds. District staff produced
a STEM Career themed video and
participated in the live event with a
booth. Students got the experience
of exploring the District’s Argo
amphibious vehicle.

A member of the public wearing one of our 3D printed headbands with glowstick antennae at the Lighting of the Bridge event while the sun sets over the Sacramento River.

A puppy as a mosquito
larva about to be eaten by a
mosquitofish at our outreach
booth at the Palo Cedro
Honeybee Festival.

Our Argo amphibious vehicle
interactive display at the STEM
Career Fair 2022.

Our mascot, Missy Keeto, at a
National Night Out event
with members of the Redding
Fire Department present.

This year also marked the first
annual Lighting of the Bridge
event held at the Sundial Bridge in
Redding, where we had an event
for California Mosquito Awareness
Week and lit the bridge green!
Additional pictures can be found
on the cover and table of contents
pages. Big thanks to the Shasta
Public Libraries for partnering
with us on that event to share
our programs and engage with
residents.
22 Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

FINANCIAL REPORT
Statement of Financial Position:

FY 2021-2022 (June 30, 2022)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents $3,262,576
Due from other governments 5,954
Inventories 163,939
Non-depreciable capital assets 51,273
Depreciable capital assets, net 1,060,335
TOTAL ASSETS $4,544,077
Long-Term Liabilities
Note payable $107,979
Net pension liability 1,489,948
OPEB 15,518
Compensated Absences 117,693
TOTAL LIABILITIES $1,731,138
2021-2022 REVENUES
Property Taxes 1,639,614 50.91%
Assessments 1,562,854 48.52%
Interest & Miscellaneous 18,421 0.57%
TOTAL REVENUE 3,220,889 100%
2021-2022 EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Benefits 2,239,617 77.47%
Service and Supplies 604,473 20.91%
Utility Expense 46,907 1.62%
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 2,890,997 100%
The Shasta Mosquito and Vector Control District
depends on property tax revenues and benefit
assessments to fund its operations. The District’s
objective is to be fiscally responsible in accordance
with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(GAAP), Governmental Accounting, Auditing and
Financial Reporting (GAAFR), as well as State
Controller reporting guidelines.

During the year, the District successfully used a
cloud-based system for many aspects of day-to-day
operations. This gives us the flexibility of working
remotely, without impeding business practices. As a
District we are always committed to the responsible
management of public funds. We continue to utilize
a transparent approach in our finances as well as all
aspects of District operations. We continue to have
successful filings of clean annual audits.

Staff is currently working on a Capital Improvements
Plan which will take us into the next 5 years. In the
past this was a successful experience and will continue to support planning for the future growth of the
district.

Property Taxes
51%
Assessments
48%
Other Revenues
1%
Property Taxes
Assessments
Other Revenues

REVENUES
Salaries and
Benefits
77%
Service and
Supplies
21%
Utility Expense
2%
Salaries and
Benefits
Service and
Supplies
Utility Expense

EXPENDITURES
Packet Pg. 3323Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report) And that about covers it.
19200 Latona Road, Anderson, CA 96007
P: 530-365-3768 F: 530-365-0305
www.shastamosquito.org
Thank you
to John Albright
who shared over 25 years
of his career dedicating himself
to Shasta MVCD residents.

John loved to teach, learn,
and innovate - a set of values
our agency holds dear.

Happy retirement,
John!
Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: ^2022 Annual Report (2A--Presentation of Shasta Mosquito & Vector Control District’s 2022 Annual Report)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Visit Redding presentation by Danny Orloff, Tourism Marketing Director, providing a quarterly report regarding tourism marketing and promotion efforts for the City of Redding.

MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 2B
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2B--Presentation by Danny Orloff of Visit Redding regarding Redding tourism updates.

Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 35

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the report regarding use of the California Correctional Center (Susanville Correctional Facility) with no further action required.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with this report.

Alternative Action
City Council may choose to not accept this report and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
Pursuant to City Council Direction, the Police Chief, City Attorney and the City Manager met with the Shasta County Chief Executive Officer and the Shasta County Sheriff to discuss the use of the closed California Correctional Center (CCC) in Susanville as a County Jail. In the meeting, the Sheriff informed City staff that the north state Sheriffs’ had discussed this several times, in depth, and it is simply a “no go.” There are several reasons for this conclusion including the overall cost, the legal difficulties, the transportation logistics and the condition of the facility.

The current facility is in disrepair and the capital cost to repair the facility and convert it from a prison to a jail is considered insurmountable given that the existing Shasta County Jail must also remain open and it too requires ongoing capital investment. When asked about the opportunity to house post-sentence offenders the Sheriff indicated that there is still a fair amount of transportation consideration such as ongoing appeals, attorney/client meetings, health care and court hearings which would increase the overall cost and logistical difficulty.

MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.1(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.1(a)--California Correctional Center (Susanville Correctional Facility) Report Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 36
Report to Redding City Council September 12, 2023
Re: 4.1(a)--California Correctional Center (Susanville Correctional Facility) Report Page 2 It was determined that even if you could overcome the above obstacles you still have the issue of long-term governance through a joint powers agreement (or other type of agreement), multijurisdictional liability issues and conflicts and potential for future political conflicts resulting in the overall failure of the governing entity.

For the above listed reasons and at the recommendation of the Shasta County Sheriff, it is staff’s recommendation that no additional consideration be given to this item Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Packet Pg. 37

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Adopt Resolution approving the City of Redding to apply for the Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Designation through the State of California Department of Housing and Community Development;
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to sign and submit the application, and execute all necessary documents related to Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing funding opportunities; and
(3) Find that applying for, and accepting, a Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Designation is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Fiscal Impact
The application will have no impact on any current Housing Division grant funds or the General Fund, rather, adopting the Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing (PRO Housing Designation) may provide the City of Redding (City) preferential opportunities when applying to the State of California’s Housing and Community Development (HCD) for grant funds associated with affordable housing programs and development. There is no fee to apply for this designation.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to authorize the City Manager to apply for a PRO Housing Designation, this course of action may limit the competitiveness of future affordable housing funding opportunities.

MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.2(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(a)--Authorize application for Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Designation
Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 38
Report to Redding City Council September 14, 2023
Re: 4.2(a)--Authorize application for Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Designation Page 2
Background/Analysis
Cities and counties that are compliant with the California’s Housing Element law and have applied for and been awarded the PRO Housing Designation are eligible to receive incentives when applying for specific grant opportunities. These incentives are in the form of additional points or other types of preference in the scoring of competitive housing, community development, and infrastructure programs. Increasing the availability of housing statewide is critical to improving the quality of life of all Californians and assisting in the fight against homelessness.

The 2019-2020 Budget Act provided a spectrum of support, incentives, and accountability measures to meet California’s housing goals, and provided for the establishment of the PRO Housing Designation Program. HCD is determined to alleviate California’s housing crisis by making additional community development resources available to local governments with a PRO Housing designation.

To date, 30 California cities have achieved the PRO Housing designation.

Environmental Review
Applying for grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required at this time. Any future projects that may be associated with the PRO Housing designation will be reviewed for CEQA compliance once the details are known.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Resolution
Packet Pg. 39
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING APPLICATION TO AND PARTICIPATION IN THE

PROHOUSING DESIGNATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, Government Code section 65589.9 established the Prohousing Designation Program (“PDP” or “Program”), which creates incentives for jurisdictions that are compliant with state housing element requirements and that have enacted Prohousing local policies; and WHEREAS, such jurisdictions will be designated Prohousing and, as such, will receive additional points or other preference during the scoring of their competitive applications for specified housing and infrastructure funding; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Community Development (“Department”) has adopted emergency regulations (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 25, § 6600 et seq.) to implement the Program (“Program Regulations”), as authorized by Government Code section 65589.9, subdivision (d); and
WHEREAS, the CITY OF REDDING (“Applicant”) desires to submit an application for a Prohousing Designation (“Application”).

THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED THAT:

1. Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to submit an Application to the Department.

2. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it is currently in compliance with applicable state housing law.

3. Applicant acknowledges and confirms that it will continue to comply with applicable housing laws and to refrain from enacting laws, developing policies, or taking other local governmental actions that may or do inhibit or constrain housing production. Examples of such local laws, policies, and action include moratoriums on development; local voter approval requirements related to housing production; downzoning; and unduly restrictive or onerous zoning regulations, development standards, or permit procedures. Applicant further acknowledges and confirms that it commits itself to affirmatively furthering fair housing pursuant to Government Code section 8899.50.

4. If the Application is approved, Applicant is hereby authorized and directed to enter into, execute, and deliver all documents required or deemed necessary or appropriate to participate in the Program, and all amendments thereto (the “Program Documents”).

5. Applicant acknowledges and agrees that it shall be subject to the Application; the terms and conditions specified in the Program Documents; the Program Regulations; and any and all other applicable law.

Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.2(a)--Authorize application for Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Designation)

6. The City Manager, or designee, is authorized to execute and deliver the Application and the Program Documents on behalf of the Applicant for participation in the Program.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of September, 2023, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney The undersigned, Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk of the City of Redding, does hereby attest and certify that the foregoing is a true and full copy of a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, Applicant’s governing body, adopted at a duly convened meeting on the date above-mentioned, and that the resolution has not been altered, amended, or repealed.

SIGNATURE: _____________________ DATE: _____________________ NAME: __________________________ TITLE: _____________________ Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.2(a)--Authorize application for Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Designation)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the submission of a Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods grant program application in an amount not to exceed $750,000 for planning funds for the Martin Luther King, Jr. Neighborhood;
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the grant application and all applicable documents to complete the application process and if awarded the grant, accept and appropriate the funds accordingly;
(3) Find that acting in an administrative capacity is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
(4) Find that acting in an administrative capacity is an exempt activity under the National Environmental Policy Act.

Fiscal Impact
The Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods (RCN) grant program may have a match obligation depending on its location. Should the project location meet the definition of a Disadvantaged Community, a zero-match would be allowed under the grant. Should the project location not meet the Disadvantaged Community requirements, a 20 percent match would be required by the grant. Match funds may include non-federal sources such as state funds, local funds originating from state or local revenue-funded programs, philanthropic funds, or private funds. In-kind contributions may also be used as match funds for such items as compensation for community members’ time, materials, pro bono work provided to the project by third parties and donations from private sponsors. Any match commitment will be brought before City Council (Council) for consideration. There is no impact to the General Fund.

MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.2(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(b)--Authorize submission of a Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods grant application
Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 42
Report to Redding City Council September 13, 2023
Re: 4.2(b)--Authorize submission of Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods grant application Page 2
Alternative Action
The Council could decline to authorize submission of the RCN grant applications or provide alternate direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The RCN is the result of two grant programs that have been combined by the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) into one Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO). The Reconnecting Communities Pilot (RCP) program was established by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and the Neighborhood Access and Equity Program was established by the Inflation Reduction Act.

Under the combined RCN Program, the USDOT will offer three types of grants: Community Planning, Capital Construction, and Regional Partnerships Challenge. The USDOT combined these programs into a single NOFO to provide a more efficient application process as the programs share many common characteristics including improving access to daily needs such as jobs, education, healthcare, food and recreation. Fostering equitable development and restoration, reconnecting communities by removing, retrofitting or mitigating highways or other transportation facilities that create barriers to community connectivity, including to mobility, access or economic development.

The City of Redding’s (City) application will focus on a planning grant in an amount not-toexceed $750,000 for the Martin Luther King, Jr. (MLK) Neighborhood that will provide funding for studies to assess the feasibility of removing barriers that disconnect the neighborhood from other neighborhoods and city amenities. Possible barriers include Linden Avenue, an unimproved street and the Union Pacific railroad that disconnects the MLK neighborhood from services along Highway 273. Costs funded by the grant may include predevelopment activities such as planning, feasibility, conducting associated environmental reviews, engineering and design for infrastructure in the neighborhood that will reconnect MLK to other parts of the City.

Possible infrastructure that may result from this planning effort includes a lengthy box culvert along Linden Avenue, reinstallation of Linden Avenue, utilities that support the development of income-eligible housing units on 26 City-owned lots that front the unimproved section of Linden Avenue and a possible pedestrian bridge over the Union Pacific railroad.

Environmental Review
Applying for grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Any project that is developed will be reviewed for CEQA compliance once the details are known.

Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), administrative and management activities such as applying for grant funding are considered exempt activities and no further action is required. Any construction projects will be reviewed for NEPA requirements if awarded funding.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
Government of the 21st Century - “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Economic Development- “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Packet Pg. 43
Report to Redding City Council September 13, 2023
Re: 4.2(b)--Authorize submission of Reconnecting Communities and Neighborhoods grant application Page 3
Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 44

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the Third Amendment to the Land and Building Lease Agreement (C-7786) with the Economic Development Corporation of Shasta County for City of Redding (City)-owned property located at 777 Auditorium Drive, to exercise the last of three, one-year options extending the lease term from October 1, 2023, through September 30, 2024, for the monthly lease payment to the City in the amount of $3,142.53.

Fiscal Impact
The rent will be $37,710.36 annually. The rent revenue pays for building maintenance costs, including contract expenses for HVAC service and pest control, replacement costs for flooring, roof, and parking lot re-paving associated with this facility.

Alternative Action
The City Council could decline to approve the lease amendment and direct staff to prepare a solicitation for a new tenant or provide alternate direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The City constructed the building in 1985 to house the Convention and Visitors Bureau operations. In June 2010, the City contracted tourism marketing services to the Shasta Cascade Wonderland Association and the offices at 777 Auditorium Drive were vacated. From November 2011 until January 2018, the building was leased to a real estate firm.

MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.6(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(a)--Approve Lease Amendment with the Shasta County Economic Development Corporation at 777 Auditorium Drive Exercising the Last One-Year Option Kim Niemer, Community
Services Director
Packet Pg. 45
Report to Redding City Council September 13, 2023
Re: 4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation Page 2 The Land and Building Lease Agreement (C-7786) dated August 24, 2018, between the City and the Economic Development Corporation of Shasta County (EDC) provided for a term of threeyear lease with three additional one-year options to extend the term for a total of six years. This amendment is the third and final extension allowed. The agreement expires on September 30, 2024.

In addition to the extension, there was a three percent increase in rent from $36,612.00 to $37,710.36, and new language is proposed to allow the EDC to terminate early if they continue paying the monthly rent until a new tenant is in place.

Environmental Review
The adoption of this lease is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. This exemption permits the lease of existing public facilities when there is negligible or no expansion of use. The adoption of this Lease does not expand the use of the facility.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.

Attachments
^Third Amendment to Land and Building Lease Agreement (C-7786) Second Amendment to Land and Building Lease Ageement (C-7786) First Amendment to Land and Building Lease Agreement (C-7786) Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786)
Packet Pg. 46
Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: ^Third Amendment to Land and Building Lease Agreement (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: ^Third Amendment to Land and Building Lease Agreement (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Second Amendment to Land and Building Lease Ageement (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Second Amendment to Land and Building Lease Ageement (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Second Amendment to Land and Building Lease Ageement (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Second Amendment to Land and Building Lease Ageement (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Second Amendment to Land and Building Lease Ageement (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Second Amendment to Land and Building Lease Ageement (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: First Amendment to Land and Building Lease Agreement (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: First Amendment to Land and Building Lease Agreement (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development

LAND AND BUILDING LEASE AGREEMENT
THIS LAND AND BUILDING LEASE AGREEMENT (this "Lease" or "Lease Agreement"), dated for reference purposes only as of August 24, 2018, is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF REDDING, a Municipal Corporation and General Law City, hereinafter referred to as the "Lessor," and the ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF SHASTA COUNTY, a California Nonprofit Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Lessee".

This Lease shall be effective as of the date and year it is signed and delivered by both Lessor and Lessee (the "Effective Date").

WITNESSETH:

WHEREAS, Lessor owns certain land, and improvements thereon consisting of approximately 2, 130 square feet of space, commonly known as 777 Auditorium Drive, Redding, California, and more particularly described and shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof (the "Premises");
WHEREAS, the Premises are not needed for municipal purposes in the immediate future; and
WHEREAS, Lessor desires to lease the Premises to Lessee, and Lessee desires to lease the Premises from Lessor, on the terms and conditions set forth herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED by and between the parties hereto as follows:

1. AGREEMENT TO LEASE
Lessor hereby leases the Premises to Lessee, and Lessee hereby leases the Premises from Lessor, upon and subject to all of the terms, conditions, covenants and agreements set forth herein.

2. TERM; POSSESSION
A. The initial term of this Lease shall commence on the Effective Date and shall expire on September 30, 2021, unless sooner terminated as provided herein (the "Initial Term").

Lessee may, with the consent of Lessor, extend the term of this Lease for three additional periods of one (1) year each (each, an "Option Term"). Lessee shall provide notice of its intent to exercise such Options by giving Lessor written notice of Lessee's exercise of such Option( s) at least sixty ( 60) days prior to the expiration of the Initial Term or immediately preceding Option Term, as the case may be. Lessor shall grant or withhold its consent to each such extension, if any, by delivering written notice thereof to Lessee within thirty (30) days following Lessor's receipt of Lessee's exercise notice. All terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease shall remain in effect during each Option Term, except that the monthly rent shall be increased by three percent (3%) at the commencement of each Option Term, if any (and shall continue at that amount during the remainder of that Option Term). The Initial Term and all Option Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease
Page2
Terms, if any, are hereinafter sometimes referred to collectively as the "Term".

B. Lessee shall be entitled to terminate this Lease, upon thirty (30) days written notice to Lessor, in the event of a material reduction in Lessee's funding in any fiscal year during the Term. For purposes of this Lease, Lessee shall be deemed to have suffered a material reduction in its funding if Lessee's annual revenues during any fiscal year of Lessee during the Term are, or are expected to be, less than ninety percent (90%) of Lessee's annual revenues during the preceding fiscal year of Lessee. Lessee's failure to exercise such termination right with respect to any given fiscal year during the Term shall not operate as a waiver of Lessee's right to terminate this Lease with respect to any later fiscal year during the Term.

C. Lessee shall be given possession of the Premises upon the Effective Date.

3. RENT AND OTHER CHARGES
A. Commencing on the Effective Date, and continuing throughout the remainder of the Initial Term of this Lease, Lessee shall pay monthly rent to Lessor in the amount of Two Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy-Five and 50/100 Dollars ($2,875.50).

Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the Effective Date is prior to September 1, 2018, Lessee's rent obligations hereunder shall not commence until September 1, 2018.

B. Rent shall be payable, monthly, in advance, on or before the first (1st) day of each calendar month during the Term. Except as otherwise provided in Section 3.A, in the event this Lease commences or the date of expiration or termination of this Lease occurs other than on the first or last day of a calendar month, the rent for such month shall be prorated based upon the actual number of days of such month. Lessor is entitled to collect from Lessee, and Lessee agrees to pay Lessor, upon invoice, any other fees and charges set forth herein. Any rentals, fees, and charges more than thirty (30) days past due shall be subject to a service charge of one and one-half (1.5%) per month, based on an annual rate of eighteen percent (18%), or the maximum rate allowed by law, if lower. Without prejudice to any other remedy which otherwise might be used for non-payment of rent, fees, and charges, or other breach of this Lease, if Lessor is required or elects to pay any sum or sums or incurs any obligation or expense by reason of a failure, neglect, or refusal of Lessee to perform any one or more of the terms, conditions, covenants of this Lease, or as the result of any act or omission of Lessee contrary to said terms, conditions, or covenants, the sum or sums so paid by Lessor, including all interest, costs, damages or penalties, may be added, after thirty (30) days written notice by Lessor to Lessee, to an installment or rent thereafter due hereunder, and each and every day thereafter the same shall be and become additional rent recoverable by Lessor in the same manner and with like remedies as though it were originally a part of the rent as set forth herein above.

4. UTILITIES AND WATER
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

Lessee shall pay for the following separately metered or invoiced utility services supplied to Lessee at the Premises: sewer, electricity (including electricity for any exterior lights on the building), natural gas, solid waste, telephone, security, and cable television. Lessee shall also pay for all domestic and landscaping water supplied to Lessee at the Premises through City of Redding Water Meter No. 18437824 (but not for any landscaping water supplied through any other water meter). Lessor shall be responsible for the cost of any landscaping water provided through any other water meter.

5. TAXES
A. Lessee shall promptly pay any taxes assessed against its personal property, and any possessory interest tax levied by reason of its occupancy of the subject Premises.

B. Lessee is advised pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code 107.6 that a possessory interest subject to taxation may be created by the grant of this Lease to Lessee.

C. In the event a possessory interest subject to taxation is created by this Lease, Lessee shall apply for any available exemption to the obligation to pay possessory interest taxes in connection with this Lease.

6. USE OF PREMISES
A. The Premises shall be used by Lessee for the normal and customary activities related to a business office of Lessee and for no other purpose without the prior written consent of Lessor, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. In addition, no overnight lodging for any reason whatsoever shall be permitted on the leased Premises.

B. It is the intent of this Lease Agreement that the Premises shall be used primarily for office functions, and shall not generally include entertainment, lodging, retail, food or beverage services. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessee shall be entitled to conduct business social and other events at the Premises where food and beverages are served and/or which involve the use of music or public-address systems in the building and parking lot. Lessee will take precautions not to inconvenience or disturb the surrounding occupants as a result of any such activities.

C. No activities shall be conducted or carried on within the demised Premises in violation of any ordinance, law, statute, bylaw, order, or rule of any governmental agency having jurisdiction thereover. Lessor represents and warrants to Lessee that Lessee's proposed use of the Premises are permitted by the applicable zoning and other land use regulations applicable to the Premises, and will not violate any recorded or unrecorded covenants, conditions, or restrictions applicable to the Premises.

Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease
Page4

7. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
A. Lessor hereby advises Lessee that the Premises have not undergone inspection by a Certified Access Specialist (CASp), and makes the following additional disclosure to Lessee pursuant to California law:
"A Certified Access Specialist ("CASp") can inspect the subject premises and determine whether the subject premises comply with all of the applicable construction-related accessibility standards under state law.

Although state law does not require a CASp inspection of the subject premises, the commercial property owner or lessor may not prohibit the lessee or tenant from obtaining a CASp inspection of the subject premises for the occupancy or potential occupancy of the lessee or tenant, if requested by lessee or tenant. The parties shall mutually agree on the arrangements for the time and manner of the CASp inspection, the payment of the fee for the CASp inspection, and the cost of making any repairs necessary to correct violations of construction-related accessibility standards within the premises."
B. Lessor represents and warrants to Lessee that the Premises are in compliance with all Federal, State, and local laws, statutes, ordinances, codes, rules, orders, judgments, decrees, and governmental regulations or requirements applicable to or affecting the Premises (including, but not limited to, all "construction related accessibility standards" as defined in California Civil Code §55.52(a)(6), as amended) (collectively, the "Applicable Laws"). If it is determined that the Premises do not comply with the foregoing representation and warranty, or if any of the Applicable Laws are hereafter amended so as to require the construction of any addition to or alteration of the Premises, Lessor shall rectify the deficiency, or construct such addition to or alteration of the Premises, at Lessor's expense.

C. Lessor shall indemnify, defend and hold Lessee harmless against any and all claims, demands, liabilities, damages, lawsuits, causes of action (whether in tort or contract, law or equity, or otherwise), fines, penalties, losses, costs and expenses (including attorney's fees and court costs) arising out of or relating to any failure of the Premises to comply with any Applicable Laws.

D. During the Term of this Lease, Lessee shall comply with all Federal, State, and local laws, statutes, ordinances, and regulations applicable to Lessee's specific use of the Premises (except that Lessee shall not be obligated to comply with any Applicable Law that requires alterations or improvements to the Premises, all of which shall be Lessor's responsibility pursuant to Section 7.B, above).

Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

8. SERVICES TO THE PUBLIC
Lessee shall make its activities and services available to area residents without discrimination as to race, color, creed, religion, sex, age, or national origin, and shall refrain from imposing or levying excessively discriminatory or otherwise unreasonable rules, charges or fees for any use of the facilities or activities; provided, however, that Lessee shall have the privilege to refuse admittance to any person or persons for just cause, but not to discriminate by virtue of race, color, creed, religion, sex, age, or national origin.

9. WASTE AND QUIET CONDUCT
Lessee shall not commit nor permit to be committed, any waste upon the Premises, nor any nuisance or other act or thing which may disturb the quiet enjoyment or use of adjoining parcels by others. So long as Lessee pays the rent, and performs all other obligations of Lessee hereunder, Lessor agrees that Lessee shall have quiet possession and enjoyment of the Premises for the entire Term hereof, free of any claim or other action by Lessor or anyone claiming by, through or under Lessor.

10. MAINTENANCE
A. Except as otherwise provided herein, Lessee accepts the Premises as being in good condition and repair, and shall, upon expiration of this Lease or earlier termination thereof, leave said Premises in as good a condition and repair as the same are now, reasonable use and wear thereof excepted.

B. During the Term of this Lease, Lessor shall, at Lessor's expense, maintain, repair and/or replace, if necessary, the foundations, structural portions of the bearing walls, roofing system, roof coverings, plumbing, heating, air conditioning, ventilating, electrical and lighting fixtures and equipment, exterior surfaces of all walls, skylights, exterior landscaping, and all sidewalks, driveways, parking areas and fences located on the Premises.

C. During the Term of this Lease, and except as provided in Section 10.B, above, Lessee shall, at Lessee's expense, maintain and repair the interior of the building, including janitorial work, painting, window replacement if and when necessary, other minor repairs to the interior, and all maintenance and repair of Lessee's own fixtures and furnishings.

D. Lessee shall maintain any electrical appliances owned by Lessee and required or desired by Lessee in the use of said Premises.

E. Lessee shall arrange and provide its own janitorial services to maintain the interior of said Premises in a neat and clean condition at all times.

Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease
Page6
F. No outdoor storage shall be permitted on the leased Premises, nor is the keeping of animals permitted.

11. USE OF PREMISES AND PARKING
Throughout the Term of the lease, Lessor shall have access to the interior of the building on the Premises for the purpose of a public safety staging area on the Fourth of July Freedom Festival, and five (5) onsite parking spaces situated between the driveways during Kool April Nites weekend and the community Fourth of July Freedom Festival. The parties confirm and agree that Lessor shall not have access to the interior of the building on the Premises except on July 4th of each year during the Term. Lessor shall provide five (5) calendar days written notice to Lessee of its election to reserve the Premises and/or parking spaces pursuant to this Section. Lessor shall indemnify, defend and hold Lessee, and its officers, agents and employees, harmless from and against any claims, demands, actions, damages, liabilities, loss, cost or expense arising out of any use of the Premises by Lessor pursuant to this Section.

12. IMPROVEMENTS; ALTERATIONS
A. Lessee shall not make or permit anyone to make any alterations, decorations, additions, or improvements, structural or otherwise, in or to the Premises or the building without the prior written consent of Lessor, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. When granting its consent, Lessor may impose any condition it deems reasonable and appropriate, including, without limitation, the approval of plans and specifications, conditioning approval upon Lessee's commitment to replace and/repair any portion of the Premises for which an alteration, decoration, addition or improvement was approved, and/or imposition of insurance requirements in addition to those required herein. Lessor hereby consents to the alterations, additions and/or improvements to the Premises by Lessee described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, and no further consent of Lessor shall be required in connection therewith (provided that Lessee shall obtain all building permits required to complete such work). Whether or not Lessor's consent is required, Lessee agrees to obtain and deliver to Lessor written and unconditional waivers of mechanics' and materialmen's liens upon the land and building, of which the Premises are a part, for all work, labor and services performed and materials furnished by them in connection with such work, signed by all contractors, subcontractors, materialmen, and laborers involved with such work.

If, notwithstanding the foregoing, any mechanics' or materialmen' s lien is filed against the Premises, the building, and/or the land for which work is claimed to have done or materials claimed to have been furnished to Lessee, such lien shall be discharged by Lessee within thirty (30) days thereafter, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, by the payment thereof or by filing any bond required by law. If Lessee shall fail to discharge any such mechanics' or materialmen's lien, Lessor may, at its option, discharge the same and treat the cost thereof as additional rent payable with the monthly installment Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

of rent next becoming due; it being hereby expressly covenanted and agreed that such discharge by Lessor shall not be deemed to waive or release the default of Lessee in not discharging the same.

It is understood and agreed by Lessor and Lessee that any alterations, exterior decorations, additions, or improvements shall be constructed on behalf of Lessee; and that in the event Lessor gives written consent to Lessee making any such alteration, exterior decorations, additions, or improvements, such written consent shall not be deemed to be an agreement or consent by Lessor to subject Lessor's interest in the Premises, the building, or the land to any mechanics' or materialmen' s liens which may be filed in respect to any such work done by or on behalf of Lessee.

B. Lessee shall indemnify and hold Lessor harmless from and against any and all expenses, liens, claims, or damages to persons or property which arise directly or indirectly by reason of the making of any such alterations, exterior decorations, additions, or improvements. If any such work is done without the prior written consent of Lessor, Lessor may correct or remove the same and Lessee shall be liable for any and all expenses incurred by Lessor in the performance of this work. All alterations, exterior decorations, additions, or improvements in or to the Premises or the building made by either party shall immediately become the property of Lessor, and shall remain upon and be surrendered with the Premises as a part thereof at the expiration or termination of the Term hereof without disturbance, molestation, or injury; provided, however, that if Lessee is not in default in the performance of any of its obligations under this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall have the right to remove, prior to or within ten (10) days after the expiration or earlier termination of the Term hereof, all furniture, fixtures, furnishings, and equipment, installed in the Premises at the expense of Lessee. If such property of Lessee is not removed by Lessee within such time period, the same shall become the property of Lessor and shall be surrendered with the Premises as part thereof.

13. SIGNS
Lessee may place signage at the existing street location and on the building over the City seal. Other signage may be permitted as allowed through the Lessor's sign permit process. The Lessee may use the flag poles to display various flags that are in support of its mission in economic development or express our patriotism for this nation or our state.

14. PROPERTY OF LESSEE
Fixtures, equipment, and personal property of Lessee shall be removed by same within ten (10) days after the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease Agreement; provided, however, that any fixture which cannot be removed without damaging said Premises shall become the property of Lessor.

Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

15. HOLD HARMLESS; LESSEE'S LIABILITY INSURANCE
A. This Lease Agreement is granted upon the express condition that, except as otherwise provided herein, Lessor, its officers, agents and employees, shall be free from any and all liability and claims for damages for personal injury, death, or property damage in any way connected with Lessee's use of the Premises, including claims of Lessee, it's officers, agents, employees, members, or invitees. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Lessor shall indemnify, defend and save harmless Lessee, its officers, agents and employees, from any and all liability, damages, loss, cost or expense on account of or arising out of any such injury, death, or loss caused by the negligence or other legal fault of Lessor or its officers, agents, employees, members or invitees. Lessee shall indemnify and save harmless Lessor, its officers, agents and employees, from any and all liability, loss, cost or obligation on account of or arising out of any such injury, death, or loss caused by the negligence or other legal fault of Lessee or its officers, agents, employees, members or invitees (provided, however, that Lessee shall have no liability to Lessor for any damage to the Premises or any alterations made by Lessee caused by fire or other casualty that would be covered by a policy of insurance described in Section 16.B( 1 ), below, and, in the event of any such damage, Lessor shall rely solely on Lessor's self-insurance and/or the proceeds of the insurance policies, if any, maintained by Lessor and/or Lessee pursuant to Section 16, below).

B. Unless modified in writing by City's Risk Manager, Lessee shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:

Covera1:;e Reguired Not Reguired
Commercial General Liability x
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability x
Workers' Compensation and Employers' x
Liability
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) x
(Place an "x" in the appropriate box)
C. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office fonn number CG-0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;

2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease
Page9

3. Statutory Workers' Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;

4. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording '"but only in the event of a named insured's sole negligence" or any other verbiage limiting the insured's insurance responsibility.

D. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; or the Lessee shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

E. The General Liability insurance required by this Section 15 shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Lessee; premises owned, leased or used by Lessee; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Lessee. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

2. The insurance coverage of Lessee shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Lessee's insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Lessee shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

4. Each insurance policy required by this Section 15 shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Lessee agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City.

F. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A-VII.

Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

G. Lessee shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the insurance.

Lessee shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress A venue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City's Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Lessee if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.

H. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Lessee as required by this Section 15, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Lessee pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.

I. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a "claims made" policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure§ 342 and Government Code§ 945.6, Lessee shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen (18) months after the expiration or termination of this Lease.

J. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Lease, Lessee shall immediately notify City's Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225-4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Lessee shall submit a written report to City's Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Lessee's insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.

16. PROPERTY DAMAGE INSURANCE; WA/VER OF CLAIMS; WA/VER OF

SUBROGATION
A. During the Term of this Lease, Lessor shall, at its expense, either ( 1) obtain and keep in force a policy of standard fire, extended coverage and special form (all risks) insurance, including demolition and ordinance and law coverages, written on a replacement cost new basis, with no deductible, covering the Premises and any alterations thereto made by Lessee, (2) self-insure against loss or damage to the Premises and alterations arising out of the risks which would otherwise be covered by a policy of the type described in Section 16.A(l), above, or (3) protect against loss or damage to the Premises and alterations arising out of such risks through a combination of self-insurance (whether by way of a high deductible, self-insured retention, or otherwise) and a policy of standard fire, extended coverage and special form (all risks) insurance covering the Premises and alterations.

Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease
Page I I
B. Lessor hereby releases and relieves Lessee, and its subtenant(s), if any, and their respective officers, directors, agents, employees, customers and invitees, and covenants not to sue and waives its right to recover damages from such persons and entities, for any loss or damage to the Premises and/or any alterations made by Lessee that is, would be, or would have been covered by ( 1) a policy of standard fire, extended coverage and special form (all risks) insurance, including demolition coverage and ordinance and law coverages A, B, and C with limits of no less than $250,000.00, written on a replacement cost new basis, with no deductible, covering the Premises and any alterations made by Lessee, or (2) by any policy of insurance covering the Premises (with or without coverage for any alterations made by Lessee) actually maintained by Lessor. In the event Lessor maintains a policy ofinsurance covering loss or damage to the Premises (with or without coverage for any alterations made by Lessee), whether primary, excess, or other, Lessor shall obtain from its insurance carrier, and deliver to Lessee, a waiver of any right to subrogation such carrier may have against Lessee, and/or its subtenant(s), if any, and/or their respective officers, directors, agents, employees, customers and invitees.

C. The parties acknowledge that Lessor desires that Lessee obtain a separate policy of fire and extended coverage insurance covering the Premises and any alterations thereto made by Lessee (i.e., in addition to the insurance and/or self-insurance maintained by Lessor as provided for in this Section 16, above). Lessee is currently unable to obtain such insurance due to a moratorium on the issuance of new property damage insurance policies as a result of the recent Carr Fire. Lessee shall, at least once every ninety (90) days during the Term, use commercially reasonable efforts to investigate the availability and cost of a separate policy of standard fire and extended coverage insurance covering the Premises and any alterations thereto made by Lessee with a deductible of One Thousand and 00/100 Dollars ($1,000.00) or less, and otherwise meeting the requirements of this Section 16.C, below. In the event Lessee is able to obtain such a policy from an insurance carrier admitted in the State of California, Lessee shall purchase and maintain such policy of insurance in effect. Any such policy of insurance obtained by Lessee shall be in the name of Lessee with Lessor named as an additional insured. Any such policy of insurance obtained by Lessee shall also be primary with respect to any covered damage to the Premises or alterations (and any insurance or self-insurance covering the Premises and alterations maintained by Lessor pursuant to this Section 16, above, shall be excess). Lessor shall, upon request, provide such information, execute such documents and instruments, and otherwise take such action as may be necessary or desirable for Lessee to obtain such insurance coverage. Lessee shall provide Lessor with a certificate of insurance evidencing any policy of insurance obtained by Lessee hereunder.

Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

D. In the event this Lease is not terminated as a result of any damage to or destruction of the Premises pursuant to Section 22, below, the proceeds of the insurance maintained by Lessor (and by Lessee, if any) pursuant to this Section 16 shall be used to repair and/or restore the Premises and/or Lessee's alterations.

17. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING
A. Lessee shall not voluntarily assign or encumber Lessee's interest in this Lease Agreement or in the Premises, or sublease all or any part of the Premises, or allow any other person or entity (except Lessee's authorized representatives) to occupy or use all or any part of the Premises, without first obtaining Lessor's prior written consent, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Notwithstanding the foregoing. Lessee shall be entitled to do the following without obtaining the consent of Lessor: (a) rent or otherwise provide co-working space in the Premises to individuals or entities; and (b) rent or sub-lease space in the Premises to one or more individuals or entities engaged in workforce development or other activities that are aligned with or supportive of Lessee's economic development activities. Except as provided above, any assignment, encumbrance, or other sublease without Lessor's consent shall be voidable and, at the sole election of Lessor, shall constitute a default of this Lease Agreement. No consent to any assignment, encumbrance, or sublease, shall constitute a further waiver of the provisions of this Section. If Lessee consists of more than one person, a purported assignment, voluntary, involuntary, or by operation of law, from one person to the other shall be deemed a voluntary assignment.

B. No interest of Lessee in this Lease Agreement shall be assignable by operation of law (including, without limitation, the transfer of this Lease Agreement by testacy or intestacy). Each of the following acts shall be considered an involuntary assignment:

1. If Lessee is or becomes bankrupt or insolvent, makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or institutes a proceeding under the Bankruptcy Act in which Lessee is the bankrupt; or, if Lessee is a partnership or consists of more than one person or entity, if any partner of the partnership, or other person or entity is or becomes bankrupt or insolvent, or makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors;

2. If a writ of attachment or execution is levied on this Lease Agreement;

3. If, in any proceeding or action to which Lessee is a party, a receiver is appointed with authority to take possession of the Premises.

C. An involuntary assignment shall constitute a default by Lessee, and Lessor shall have the right to elect to terminate this Lease Agreement, in which case this Lease Agreement shall not be treated as an asset of Lessee.

Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

18. LESSOR'S ENTRY ON PREMISES
A. Lessor and its authorized agents and employees, upon 24 hours' prior notice to Lessee, shall have the right to enter the Premises at all reasonable times to determine whether the Premises are in good condition and whether Lessee is complying with Lessee's obligations under this Lease Agreement.

B. Lessor shall not be liable in any manner for any inconvenience, disturbance, loss of business, nuisance, or other damage arising out of Lessor's entry on the Premises as provided in this Section. Lessee shall not be entitled to an abatement or reduction of rent if Lessor exercises any rights reserved in this Section. Lessor shall conduct its activities on the Premises as allowed in this Section in a manner that will cause the least possible inconvenience, annoyance or disturbance to Lessee.

19. WAIVER
No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of Lessor on any default by Lessee shall impair such a right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. The receipt and acceptance by Lessor of delinquent rent shall not constitute a waiver of any other default, but it shall constitute a waiver of timely payment of the particular rent payment involved.

No act or conduct of Lessor, including, without limitation, the acceptance of the keys to the Premises or the combination to any combination locks on the Premises, shall constitute an acceptance of the surrender of the Premises by Lessee before the expiration of the Term or extension of the Term of this Lease Agreement. Except as otherwise provided herein, only a notice from Lessor to Lessee shall constitute acceptance of the surrender of the Premises and accomplish a termination of this Lease Agreement. Lessor's consent to or approval of any act by Lessee requiring Lessor's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary Lessor's consent to or approval of any subsequent act by Lessee. Any waiver by Lessor or any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Lease Agreement.

20. DEFAULT
The occurrence of any of the following shall constitute a material default by Lessee:

A. Failure to pay rent when due, if the failure continues for five (5) calendar days after notice has been given to Lessee by Lessor.

B. Failure to perform any other provision of this Lease Agreement if the failure to perform is not cured within ten (10) calendar days after notice has been given to Lessee. If the default cannot be reasonably cured within ten ( 10) calendar days, Lessee shall not be in default of this Lease Agreement if Lessee commences to cure the default within the ten ( 10) calendar day period and diligently and in good faith continues to cure the default.

Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

C. Notices given under this Section shall specify the alleged default and the applicable provisions of this Lease Agreement, and shall demand that Lessee perform the provisions of this Lease Agreement or pay the rent that is in arrears, as the case may be, within the applicable period of time, or quit the Premises. No such notice shall be deemed a forfeiture or a termination of this Lease Agreement unless Lessor so elects in the notice. The purpose of the notice requirements set forth in this Section is to extend the notice requirements of the unlawful detainer statutes in California.

21. EMINENT DOMAIN
A. In the event all of the Premises shall be appropriated or taken under the power of eminent domain by any public or quasi-public authority, or is sold, transferred or conveyed in lieu thereof, this Lease Agreement shall terminate and expire as of the date of such taking, and Lessee shall thereupon be released from any liability thereafter accruing under this Lease Agreement.

B. In the event a portion of the Premises is taken under the power of eminent domain by any public or quasi-public authority, or is sold, transferred or conveyed in lieu thereof, such that the improvements thereon cannot, in Lessee's opinion, be used for its intended purposes, Lessee shall have the right to terminate this Lease Agreement as of the date Lessee is required to vacate a portion of the Premises, upon the giving of notice in writing of such election within thirty (30) days after said Premises have been so appropriated or taken. In the event of such termination, both Lessor and Lessee shall thereupon be released from any liability thereafter accruing hereunder. In the event of a partial taking of the Premises, or a sale, transfer or conveyance of a portion of the Premises in lieu thereof, and Lessee does not elect to terminate this Lease, the monthly rent and other charges payable hereunder shall be proportionately abated according to the ratio that the part of the Premises remaining useable by Lessee after the taking bears to the total area of the Premises prior to the taking. Lessor agrees, immediately after learning of any appropriation or taking, to give Lessee notice thereof in writing.

C. If the Premises are taken, or Lessee elects to terminate upon a partial taking, Lessor agrees to offer to lease to Lessee similar space on similar terms for a term equal to the remaining Term hereunder, if any such land is available for lease at the Diestelhorst Landing Office Park.

D. If this Lease Agreement is terminated in either manner herein above provided, Lessor shall be entitled to the entire award or compensation for the land in such proceedings, but the rent and other charges for the last month of Lessee's occupancy shall be prorated and Lessor agrees to refund to the vacating party any unused portion of said rent or other charges paid in advance. Lessee's right to receive compensation or damages for its improvements, fixtures, personal property, and of the moving or relocation expenses shall not be affected in any manner hereby, and Lessee reserves Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

the right to bring an action for such compensation or damages, including loss of business, leasehold interest, and other reasonable damages.

22. DAMAGE OR DESTRUCTION
In the event the Premises or any part thereof are at any time damaged or destroyed by fire, casualty or other cause, the facilities shall be repaired, restored or rebuilt, or not repaired, restored or rebuilt, in accordance with the following terms and conditions:

A. In the event the estimated cost to repair, restore and/or rebuild the Premises exceeds the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000), Lessor and Lessee shall both have the right to terminate this Lease by giving written notice to the other within thirty (30) days after the occurrence of the damage or destruction, in which event, the Term of this Lease shall expire as of the date of the damage or destruction and Lessee shall vacate the Premises and surrender the same. In such event, Lessor shall return to Lessee any rent and/or other charges paid by Lessee to Lessor with respect to periods after the date of the damage or destruction.

B. In the event the estimated cost to repair, restore and/or rebuild the Premises does not exceed the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($250,000), or neither Lessor nor Lessee elect to terminate this Lease pursuant to Section 22.A, above, Lessor shall, at Lessor's sole cost and expense, promptly repair, restore or rebuild the Premises to the same condition as the Premises were in prior to such damage or destruction.

C. In the event the Premises are damaged by fire or any other cause and this Lease is not terminated pursuant to the terms herein, the rent and all other charges payable by Lessee hereunder shall abate during the period of repair, restoration and/or rebuilding if the Premises are untenantable, and such rent and other charges shall abate on a prorata or other equitable basis if the Premises are partially tenantable by Lessee during such period.

23. BANKRUPTCY OR INSOLVENCY
If Lessee shall be adjudged bankrupt, either by voluntary or involuntary proceeding, or should be subject of any proceedings to stay the enforcement of obligations against it in the form of reorganization or otherwise under and pursuant to any existing or future laws of the Congress of the United States, or if Lessee shall discontinue business or fail in business, or abandon or vacate the Premises, or make an assignment for the benefit of creditors, or if the Premises should come into possession and control of any trustee in bankruptcy, or if any receiver should be appointed in any action or proceeding with power to take charge, possession, control, or care of the Premises, Lessor shall have the option to forthwith terminate this Lease Agreement, and re-enter the Premises and take possession thereof. In no event shall this Lease agreement be deemed an asset of Lessee after adjudication in bankruptcy.

Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

24. SURRENDER OF PREMISES
On the expiration, cancellation or termination of this Lease Agreement, Lessee shall surrender possession of the Premises to Lessor, deliver all keys to the locks on the Premises, and make known to Lessor the combination of all combination locks on the Premises. Lessee shall return the Premises and all equipment and fixtures of Lessor therein to Lessor in broom-clean condition and in as good a condition as when Lessee originally took possession, ordinary wear and tear excepted, failing which Lessor may restore the Premises and such equipment and fixtures to such condition and Lessee shall pay the cost thereof to Lessor on demand. The parties confirm and agree the Lessee's obligations under the preceding sentence shall not apply in the event of any termination of this Lease as a result of any damage to or destruction of the Premises or upon any expiration of this Lease following any damage to or destruction of the Premises.

25. ADMINISTRATION BY LESSOR
Whenever Lessee is required to secure the approval or consent of Lessor under this Lease Agreement, "Lessor" shall mean the Director of Community Services of the City of Redding.

26. ENTIRE AGREEMENT AND MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT
This Lease Agreement, which includes all exhibits attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, contains all the representations and the entire understanding and agreement between the parties pertaining to the Premises or any other matters connected therewith. This Lease Agreement shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by Lessor and Lessee. The Director of Community Services is delegated authority to amend this Lease in any manner which does not result in a decrease in the rent due under this Lease.

27. INVALID PROVISIONS
In the event any covenant, condition, or provision herein contained is held invalid by any Court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity of the same shall in no way effect any other covenant, condition, or provision herein contained.

28. NOTICES
All notices and other communications authorized or required under this Lease Agreement shall be in writing and shall be given by (a) personal delivery, (b) mailing by certified mail or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or United States express mail, or ( c) delivery by commercially recognized courier service. Any such notice or other communication shall be deemed to have been given on the date of delivery or refusal to accept delivery if addressed as follows:

Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

LESSEE
ShastaEDC
ATTN: Tony Giovaniello
777 Auditorium Drive
Redding, California 96001
LESSOR
City of Redding
ATTN: Community Services Director
777 Cypress A venue
Redding, California 96001
Either party may change its address for the purposes of this Section by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.

29. ATTORNEYS' FEES
In the event of any legal action, arbitration or other proceeding arising out of this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its reasonable attorney's fees and costs in addition to any other relief to which it may be entitled.

30. BINDING ON SUCCESSORS
Subject to the provisions in this Lease Agreement respecting assignment or subletting, all covenants, terms and conditions in this Lease Agreement shall extend to and bind the successors, heirs, and assigns of the respective parties to this Lease Agreement.

31. TIME OF ESSENCE
Time is of the essence of this Lease Agreement and of each and every provision in this Lease Agreement

32. LESSOR'S WARRANTY OF AUTHORITY
Lessor has the legal power, right and authority to enter into this Lease, and all requisite action (municipal or otherwise) has been taken by Lessor in connection with the entering into of this Lease. No further consent of any council, board, management or other committee, beneficiary, creditor, judicial or administrative body, authority or other party is required. Lessor's execution and delivery of this Lease, and the performance of its obligations hereunder, will not conflict with or violate any statute, law, municipal code, rule, regulation, or policy applicable to Lessor or the Premises. Lessor has complied with all statutes, laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations applicable to Lessor and/or the lease of the Premises by Lessor to Lessee hereunder, and has satisfied all conditions precedent to such lease required by law. This Lease is and shall be a valid, legally binding obligation of and enforceable against Lessor in accordance with its terms.

Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

33. NO PARTY DEEMED DRAFTER
In the event of a dispute between any of the parties hereto over the meaning of this Lease, no party shall be deemed to have prepared this Lease, and the principle oflaw that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.

34. RECORDING
Lessor shall, promptly following the Effective Date, record this Lease in the Official Records of Shasta County, California in accordance with California Government Code Section 37393.

35. COUNTERPARTS
This Lease may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. The execution pages of counterparts may be attached to any one copy of this Lease to fonn a single, complete document.
(SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS)
Packet Pg. 74
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Lease Agreement on the dates and year set forth below.

Dated:

Dated:
"LESSOR":

CITY OF REDDING,
A Municipal Corporation
By~~;Manager ~~:::?
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~
BARRY E. DEW ALT, City Attorney
By: Barry E. DeWalt
"LESSEE":

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

CORPORATION OF SHASTA
COUNTY, a California non-profit
corporation
~~ ~ imams, Chairman
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
<Jj ~.AL ) SS.

County of( ~ )
On ~ of-f' , 20e_, before m?J/o ~. j_ ~tl/L-: NotaryPiC:J}ersoilaiiy appeared c_.U 41'4d/Jl$' , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the personYQ whose nameks') is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/slte/~ey executed the same in his/1¢r/th¢.r authorized capacity(i,ts), and that by his/hpr/t~ir signature~-on the instrument the person(?', or the entity upon behalf of which the person~ acted, executed the same.

I certify under PENAL TY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Witness, my hand and official seal.

Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California
CountyofU~
)
) SS.
)
On JJt~...d1.lff ~ , 201f,
Notary~sonally appeared ___ ___L.~"""1..1.-""'!.~'--""'~:::....1<.Ji~c.LJO,,=""'-------'' who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to e the person~ whose name~ is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/s)(e/tI,ey executed the same in his/hfr/th~r authorized capacity(i~ ), and that by his!bp-/th¢r signature~ on the instrument the person(J'), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(!) acted, executed the same.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Witness my hand and official seal.

Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation)

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California)
County of Shasta)
On August 24, 2018, before me, Sharlene Tipton, Notary Public, personally appeared Barry Tippin, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his authorized capacity, and that by his signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal. SHARLENE TIPTON
_ Notary Public • California
~ • • Shasta County ~
z Commission# 2177426 ~ J. • • • • ,Ml !oT'!· [•~r:s ta! t5J~21( (Notary Seal)

NOTARY SEAL
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27361.7

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE NOTARY SEAL READS AS FOLLOWS:

Name of Notary: Sharlene Tipton
Date Commission Expires: January 25, 2021
Commission Number: 2177426
Redding, California . Date: August 24, 2018
Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation)

CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California)
County of Shasta)
On August 24, 2018, before me, Sharlene Tipton, Notary Public, personally appeared Kristen Schreder, who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that she executed the same in her authorized capacity, and that by her signature on the instrument the person, or the entity upon behalf of which the person acted, executed the instrument.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

WITNESS my hand and official seal.
(Notary Seal)

NOTARY SEAL
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27361.7

I CERTIFY UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE ABOVE NOTARY SEAL READS AS FOLLOWS:

Name of Notary: Sharlene Tipton
Date Commission Expires: January 25, 2021
Commission Number: 2177426
Redding, California Date: August 24, 2018
Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
) SS.

County of )
On , 201_, before me,
Notary Public, personally appeared ,
who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person( s ), or the entity upon behalf of which the person( s) acted, executed the same.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Witness my hand and official seal.

Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

ACKNOWLEDGMENT
A Notary Public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

State of California )
) SS.

County of )
On , 201_, before me,
Notary Public, personally appeared ___________________ _ who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the same.

I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.

Witness my hand and official seal.

Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) Shasta EDC lease

EXHIBIT A

DOCUMENTS DEPICTING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PREMISES

AND THE FLOOR PLAN OF THE BUILDING ON THE PREMISES
3 Pages of Attachments Follow
Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) June 29, 2018
D Parcel
GIS Web Map
BOUNDARIES OF THE PREMISES 0
I
0 0.004 75
' 0.0075
1:664

0.0095
JI

0.015

0.019 ml
.. .. •'

0.03 km
Source: Esri, OlglalGlotio. GooEyo. Earth&tar Goographiee, CNES/Alrbus OS. USDA USCIS. Al!roGRID. IGN. ard the GIS User Communily Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with @
. ·····----···· ----------------
Por. Sec. 11. P.B. Reading Grant
@ 1'~
~~'~ ·~~,.~ ~I • ""'~ ,/J/"'(R/WI ~- I
<.?.. ~~ ~.b. &;!!!•
' "'r r-A ', '6' $ ~ '\.!Ja1"32"°""'Y_.._,.,,... ,.__,I e 102-170
1?0 , I__-~~~& In F'eet
r-r----.------.---.-1 I I o so 100
@ @
Portion of APN 102-170-025
I~
_jO--' ~- N&4"$2'40'W
@
""" ~.s-"' 3.91•
/ N7i;',; ..-, I 7 • . fS.~33"' ~.)r,,.. / ' ·-\1(1·e.- " I " ~~··~~~~ ,;;,"'>' / ., I.., 01~ ""I ~ / ~$(f.,~'M4'....,. / 10 ~ .'\o/' -16.,,,...:::. / -· "' <?' ,''I '.I!!- '· • ~ '~ - - - :-.:;;-~ • _y~rrr;_ - - ;~ .r:~:.- ~ L'!9M!:... ~'!1> - '· St t~ '· _.:.L- 5B4•s2'4a;r - - _ wecrz~~ - 'il ef'/ _ _!::.!.- -
1 / --~,a.'!.__:-.. .-·- '·, · 47s· - - - __ - - - I
~:g
I
I
I _;.__.--- @) I t/ / ,_.,_ -.... - ---~--.....:.:::.__ HI h ~I -~ 03 fV nrfl-'Y ·t: ~··'& . -A-.... '- ...._ .f' • ...._ '. -~.ii·~ - !!!9! .~ - 299 -, f, ;!1 +') ,"'y ~\P· - ...- _. ...... ,, / \ _..;., ' -....... ............ @ 04 a---- 57.02· --·-·-!£--- I ~\ lll
~\ · \JI}~ ":A--~ _p'I / / / - ..... - -
~\.fee \. -· 'i...·--- - '' ·,_ -,-"-7"--- ..,, to / .- ., ...... ' °'!' C,/l\ \. I/ - - ~cf.!CI __ .......... ' Bl -a\ A~y- eu\'<.8 ~~i~ - - ~I ,i.> ' - --v- J!·-- !1'1
<i'---~-~ - - ).> ).>.
~ " - -t.-·- ~ .!!
'(, .. --- .M.19-119,24-38, ,.....,....,,-~<;!~O~L~-'"'-" O \ LS.3-12.27-5,29-22,31-53,34-45,36-79, :":"".,.~':,-:.::'.!!.'::r!::;:,~";"',.::."'"" .................. -.-- SMl•""'V- ...... , Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with e

NOT TO ICAUI
146SF
LOBBY
512 SF

COMPUTER ROOM
154SF

COMPUTERS

DIRECTOR
204 SF
9SF

RECEPTION
100 SF

KITCHEN
25 SF I (;
ii
HALLWAY 105.3 SF
OFFICE
132 SF
OFFICE
132 SF
TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 2130 SF
Floor Plan

CONFERENCE
250SF
8quar• foot.ag• shown Is approximate only.

STOR.
15SF
@)
July 18. 2018
Ii
Ii
1'!1
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Shasta EDC lease

EXHIBITB

DESCRIPTION OF INITIAL LESSEE IMPROVEMENTS
• Remove two (2) non-load bearing walls that were not part of the original design (see attached drawing).
• Re-Key all internal and external locks.
• Change the direction of the door swing on the data/communication room to allow for improved access for serviceability.
• Install "Push Bar" access on the Side Entry door for added security and access control system support.
• Add mechanisms to side door to support item above including rods for locking, the addition of hardware to provide for one-direction swinging to improve reliability of locking system.
• Perform minor interior electric work by tapping into existing circuits to add electrical (110/120 VAC) outlets.

Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation) r~OOM LI ~wu-u:::m

COMPUTERS
S2SF
HAU.WAY 105-3 SF
IJ=E!!!SE!!=
OFACE
132Sf
Floor Plan
OFFICE
13:1SF

DIRECTOR
.lll4SF
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Land and Building Lease Agreement - 2018 (C-7786) (4.6(a)--Lease Amendment with Economic Development Corporation)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve and authorize the following actions:
(1) Approve the month-to-month lease with Shield Regional Training Consortium in the amount of $241.50 per month for one office space located at 4300 Caterpillar Road for the Fire Department's Battalion Chief of Training; and
(2) Authorize the Redding Fire Department’s Chief to execute the lease and any other documents to complete the transaction.

Fiscal Impact
The City of Redding Fire Department (RFD) can absorb this cost in its training budget. There will be no fiscal impact from the lease cost of $241.50 per month or $2,898.00 per year.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the office space lease and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
RFDs Fire Administration, housed at City Hall, is at maximum capacity for office space. Over the past three years, RFD has converted two storage areas within Fire Administration to office space. However, more room is needed to accommodate current staff.

The Battalion Chief of Training works from Fire Administration in a converted office. RFD would like to relocate their office to the Shield Training facility to allow for better interdepartmental training development. Shield Regional Training Consortium is an organization where public safety entities have formally joined forces to execute a vision to provide frequent and affordable training courses for all public safety organizations in the north state.

If the lease is approved, the office space will be available on October 3, 2023.

MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.8(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected] SUBJECT: 4.8(a)--Office Lease at Shield Training Center Jerrod Vanlandingham, Fire
Chief
Packet Pg. 88
Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.8(a)--Office Lease at Shield Training Center Page 2 Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – "Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding." Attachments
Shield Lease 9.5.23
Packet Pg. 89
Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Shield Lease 9.5.23 (4.8(a)--Office Lease at Shield Training Center) Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Shield Lease 9.5.23 (4.8(a)--Office Lease at Shield Training Center) Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Shield Lease 9.5.23 (4.8(a)--Office Lease at Shield Training Center) Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: Shield Lease 9.5.23 (4.8(a)--Office Lease at Shield Training Center)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve donation of the Redding Fire Department’s obsolete Kenwood mobile radios and Minitor pagers valued at approximately $5,300 to regional fire departments.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the donation and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The City of Redding Fire Department (RFD) has completed its radio upgrade to the new Motorola P-25 Radio system. RFD has up to 40 Minitor pagers and 10 Kenwood mobile radios, which are antiquated and no longer work on the upgraded system but can be helpful to other regional partners. RFD has no need for the equipment and donating the equipment to other fire departments will assist our regional partners.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – "Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding." MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.8(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected] SUBJECT: 4.8(b)--Donation of Redding Fire Department's obsolete pagers and radios to regional fire departments.

Jerrod Vanlandingham, Fire
Chief
Packet Pg. 94

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and ratify the submission of an application to the U.S. Department of Justice 2023 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant Program in the amount of $49,198 to fund the purchase of tactical rifles and slings; and authorize the City Manager to sign the grant application's certifications and assurances signifying that the governing body was notified of the application and citizens were provided the opportunity to comment on the application.

Fiscal Impact
The U.S. Department of Justice 2023 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant (JAG) Program provides supplemental funding to the Redding Police Department (RPD). There is no negative General Fund impact by applying for and accepting this grant funding.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the grant application. RPD would lose the opportunity to purchase needed equipment.

Background/Analysis
RPD is scheduled to receive funding from the JAG Program, a formula (block) grant through which RPD will be awarded $49,198. These funds are usually offered on an annual basis, but the amount and application deadlines vary from year-to-year. The grant application deadline was August 31, 2023, and the application has already been submitted online. Prior to the utilization of these funds, the City of Redding (City) must make the application available for review by the governing body and must allow an opportunity for comments from citizens. Attached is a Utilization Plan explaining how the funds will be expended.

MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.9(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.9(a)--Affirm submission of an application for the U.S. Department of Justice 2023 Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grant to provide equipment for the Redding Police Department.

Bill Schueller, Chief of Police
Packet Pg. 95
Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.9(a)--Department of Justice Assistance Grant Page 2 RPD requests that the funds this year be used to purchase additional tactical rifles. At the end of 2022, with the scrutiny that the Defense Reutilization Marketing Office had come under, RPD decided to return 57 rifles to the federal government. These rifles were fairly old and while they functioned, they were very outdated.

Rifles have become essential standard issue for law enforcement agencies in California and give officers the ability to respond to significant threats. While RPD over the last several years has purchased rifles, it is necessary to purchase additional rifles to ensure all officers who need them, have them. Currently, RPD has 84 rifles. It has been determined that of the 122 sworn positions, 112 should be issued rifles, leaving RPD short by 28. The $49,198 available in JAG Program funding will allow RPD to purchase an additional 34 rifles which will provide a few backup rifles.

Environmental Review
Obtaining the grant is not defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
^Redding Police Department Proposal Narrative
Packet Pg. 96
JAG 2023
Redding Police Department
Proposal Narrative
The Redding Police Department (RPD) will use its $49,198 JAG allocation to purchase tactical rifles and slings. RPD had 57 Defense Reutilization Marketing Office (DRMO) rifles that were returned at the end of 2022. These rifles were fairly old and while they functioned, they were very outdated. The DRMO Program had come under scrutiny over the past few years and many law enforcement agencies are returning their military/DRMO equipment.

When RPD returned the military rifles, they were able to purchase 60 tactical rifles and slings which brought the current rifle count to 84. RPD currently has 122 sworn positions and of this number, it has been determined that 112 should be issued rifles, leaving the Department short 28 rifles. To address this, RPD’s JAG allocation of $49,198 will be used to purchase an additional 34 rifles and slings allowing to issue rifles to all officers in need of them and provide a few backup rifles.

Rifles are now essential standard issue for law enforcement agencies in California and they give officer the ability to respond to significant threats. They are more accurate than handguns, have better ballistic capabilities and round capacity. They are critical for active shooter responses and potential mass shooting incidents.

Response to Mass Casualty and Active Shooter Threats- In 1997, the infamous North Hollywood Bank of America robbery and shootout created a calling for law enforcement to have more firepower and protection on patrol. There are numerous arguments for officers being issued Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: ^Redding Police Department Proposal Narrative (4.9(a)--Department of Justice Assistance Grant) JAG 2023
Redding Police Department
and carrying AR platform/style rifles in their vehicles. Over the past decade there have been numerous tragic mass shootings at schools and businesses. Law enforcement has adapted their response to these incidents, now knowing that patrol can no longer wait for a SWAT Team to arrive. Active shooter tactics have changed and the first officers on scene are now being taught to advance and located shooters during mass casualty events and to stop the killing. A patrol rifle is a critical piece of this response to an active shooter. The Redding Police Department has trained 3 times in the last year in large scale active shooter scenarios.

Rifles Outperform Handguns- Semi Automatic rifles fire at approximately 2400 to 3200 feet per second while handguns fire at 900 to 1100 feet per second. Rifles are far more precise and allow officers to take precision shots when necessary. This increases the likelihood that a suspect is hit with the round and lowers the risk of hitting an innocent bystander with a missed shot by an officer.

Rifles also allow officers to shoot from far greater distances to protect themselves and end violent confrontations behind cover. This can end confrontations more quickly saving lives. In recent mass shootings, suspects were wearing body armor. Rifle rounds, unlike handgun rounds, have the ability to penetrate body armor. Rifles also bring the ability to carry up to 30 rounds in a magazine, giving an officer the advantage of firing multiple times in a gunfight before having to reload.

Handguns require reloading more often with 15 round magazines.

While it is unfortunate that it is necessary to arm all officers in this manner, providing rifles is necessary to protect the community and our officers. The use of JAG funds to equip the remaining sworn personnel fills a funding gap that has existed in the RPD budget for several years. The additional rifles were requested during the City of Redding’s budget process but due to insufficient Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: ^Redding Police Department Proposal Narrative (4.9(a)--Department of Justice Assistance Grant) JAG 2023
Redding Police Department
funds, the request was denied. This item has been a high priority for the Department and JAG funding will allow that priority to be met.

Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: ^Redding Police Department Proposal Narrative (4.9(a)--Department of Justice Assistance Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions:
(1) Accept grant funds from the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) on behalf of Centerville Community Services District (CCSD);
(2) Approve the HMGP Project Agreement with CCSD for the Muletown Pump Station Generator Project;
(3) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 12th Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $350,000 for the Centerville Generator Project, $225,000 in federal grant funding and $125,000 in local match funds from Redding Electric Utility; and
(4) Find that the action is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Section 15061(b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption.

Fiscal Impact
The total requested project budget is $350,000. The Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP), a federally funded grant requires a 25 percent local match for all projects. The Water Utility is seeking to accept $225,000 in HMGP funding.

Redding Electric Utility (REU) has sufficient funds within its reserves to fulfill the local matching requirement of an amount not to exceed $125,000.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the grant funds on behalf of Centerville Community Services District (CCSD) or approve the agreement with CCSD for the HMGP project. CCSD would not be able to meet the requirements to receive federal funding and the project would not be designed and constructed.

MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Accept Grant Funds, Approve the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement with Centerville Community Services District and Adopt Resolution Appropriating Funds
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 100
Report to Redding City Council September 8, 2023
Re: 4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD Page 2 Background/Analysis
The HMGP is intended to implement short-term and long-term solutions to mitigate post disaster loss of life and property from future events. Funding for the program is managed by the California Office of Emergency Services (CalOES), is available after a disaster is federally declared, and is available on a competitive basis statewide for eligible mitigation activity.

The City has a Local Hazard Mitigation Plan (LHMP), which is a requirement for HMGP funding applications. The LHMP allowed the City of Redding (City) to apply for funding through the HMGP, post Carr Fire, on behalf of CCSD. In September 2021, CalOES was notified of the HGMP funding approval for a CCSD emergency backup generator at the Muletown Pump Station (Project). The agreement allows CCSD to receive federal funding and the City will provide match funds and assist CCSD through the HMGP project process.

The City and CCSD have an emergency water intertie agreement that allows water to flow to either utility/district in need. REU Power Plant is located adjacent to the intertie and would benefit greatly in the event of an emergency where the City was unable to provide water and the CCSD, through the intertie, could provide water. REU provided funds for the initial construction of the Muletown Pump Station in the early 2000s. REU has agreed to provide funds not to exceed $125,000 for the HMGP required match for the design and construction of the Project.

The agreement has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
Staff has reviewed the action and determined that it is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, per Section 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption). CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. The agreement will provide match funds for the project, but will not result in direct physical alteration of the environment. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment. As the CEQA lead agency, the CCSD will prepare all necessary technical studies and prepare the CEQA compliance document for the HMGP project.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21
st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
^Resolution
Agreement
NOE HMGP Project Agreement
Packet Pg. 101
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 12 TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060
APPROPRIATING $350,000 FOR THE CENTERVILLE GENERATOR PROJECT IN FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
221
211
6191
8001
Water – Capital Outlay
REU - Revenues
$350,000
$125,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
211-0000-2910000-00000 Fund Balance - REU $ 125,000
Increase (Decrease) Revenues
211-8001-3583150-00000 Transfer To Water (125,000)
221-6191-3573100-00000 Transfer From REU 125,000
221-6191-3610101-00000 Federal Grant Capital - Water 225,000 Increase Expenditures
221-6191-6711021-00000 Designated Expenses $350,000
Total $ 350,000 $ 350,000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $350,000 for the Centerville Generator Project for fiscal year 2023-2024.

Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of September, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD)

REDDING
POWER

CITY LIMITS

INTERTIE

CLEAR CREEK RD

WESTWOOD
MANOR

CLEAR CREEK RD

PLACER RD

MULETOWN RD

CLOVERDALE RD

HAWTHORNE AVE

CHINA GULCH DR

MULETOWN
PUMP

STATION
CITY OF REDDING AND CENTERVILLE COMMUNITY SERVICE DISTRICT / HMGP AGREEMENT 0 0.25 0.5 1 Mile

EXHIBIT A
Path: X:\ACADMap\WATER\ProProjects\Water_MiscMaps\Water_MiscMaps.aprx Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Region IX
1111 Broadway, Suite 1200
Oakland, California 94607
www.fema.gov
September 8, 2021
Mark S. Ghilarducci
Director
Governor’s Authorized Representative
California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
3650 Schriever Avenue
Mather, California 95655
Reference: Application Approval, HMGP DR-4382-131-3R
City of Redding
Redding Centerville Community Services District Generator Mitigation Project FIPS Code: 089-59920, Supplement 38
Dear Mr. Ghilarducci:

We approve and issue Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) funds for the City of Redding (subrecipient), HMGP DR-4382-131-3R, Redding Centerville Community Services District Generator Mitigation Project.

The total project cost is $300,000. As shown in the enclosed Obligation Report - Supplement 38 we are obligating $225,000 for the 75 percent Federal share; the 25 percent non-Federal share is $75,000.

These funds are available in SmartLink for immediate and eligible disbursements.

Total Project Cost: Federal Share (75%): Non-Federal Share (25%):
$ 300,000 $ 225,000 $ 75,000
This HMGP project approval and obligation of funds are subject to the following conditions:

1. Scope of Work (SOW) –This project will require minor demolition work to modify the existing motor control center to accept the new automatic transfer switch. Additionally, the existing generator J-Box (on the outside-west wall of the existing building) will be removed, along with all exposed conduits and conductors. A cast-in-place concrete support pad (approximately 6 feet wide by 18 feet long and 8 to 12 inches deep) will be required for the new generator. Approximately 10 feet of new conduit will be installed in a trench via open trench method between the existing generator J-Box to the new generator; at least 24 inches of imported gravel backfill will be used for cover. All proposed work and the construction staging area will be on a previously graded site and paved parking area, both previously disturbed areas. The project will affect less than one acre in area.

Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) Mr. Ghilarducci
September 8, 2021

The project will not occur within a regulatory floodway or floodplain or near wetlands. As such, no impacts on floodplains or wetlands are anticipated.

2. Project Completion Date – The project completion date is August 4, 2023. Please inform the sub-recipient that work completed after this date is not eligible for federal funding, and that federal funds may be de-obligated for work completed outside the completion date when there is no approved time extension.

3. Project Closeout – Within 120 days of project completion, all project funds must be liquidated and final closeout documentation for the project must be submitted to FEMA.

Please note the project must comply with Code of Federal Regulations Title 2, Part 200 reporting requirements at the time of closeout.

4. Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) –This project has been determined to be Categorically Excluded from the need to prepare either an Environmental Impact Statement or Environmental Assessment in accordance with FEMA Instruction 108-1-1 and FEMA Directive 108-1-1 as authorized by DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Revision 1.

Categorical Exclusion N18 (Federal Assistance for Construction or Installation of Structures, Facilities, or Equipment to Ensure Continuity of Operations) has been applied. Particular attention should be given to the project conditions before and during project implementation.

Failure to comply with these conditions may jeopardize federal assistance including funding.

Please reference the enclosed REC for further information.

5. Standard Conditions – This project approval is subject to the enclosed Standard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Conditions, amended August 2018. Please note that federal funds may be de-obligated for work that does not comply with these conditions.

If you have any questions please contact Aaron Lim, Hazard Mitigation Assistance Specialist, by email [email protected], or phone (510) 627-7036.

Sincerely,
Kathryn Lipiecki
Director, Mitigation Division
FEMA Region 9
Enclosures (4):

Obligation Report - Supplement 38
Project Management Report
Record of Environmental Consideration (REC)
Standard Mitigation Grant (HMGP) Conditions
Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) Mr. Ghilarducci
September 8, 2021

cc: Jennifer Hogan, State Hazard Mitigation Officer, California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
Monica Williams, Hazard Mitigation Grants Specialist, California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
Concepcion Chavez, Hazard Mitigation Grants Manager, California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
Robert McCord, Chief, Hazard Mitigation Assistance Branch, FEMA Region 9 Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) State Recipient
Disaster
No
Supplemental
No
Action
No
State
Application ID
Amendment
No
FEMA
Project No
4382 - 0 131 1 38 CA Statewide
Subrecipient: Redding Project Title : Redding Centerville Community Services District Generator Project Subrecipient FIPS Code: 089-59920
3 R
Obligation Report w/ Signatures
11:21 HAZARD MITIGATION GRANTS PROGRAM
06/10/2021 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY HMGP-OB-02 Total Amount
Previously Allocated
Total Amount
Previously Obligated
$225,000.00 $225,000.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total Amount Available
for New Obligation
Total Amount
Pending Obligation
FY
Subrecipient Management
Project Amount Cost Amount Total Obligation IFMIS Date IFMIS Status $225,000.00 $0.00 $225,000.00 06/10/2021 Accept 2021

STEVEN SCOTT

AARON LIM
Authorization
Preparer Name:

HMO Authorization Name:

Preparation Date: 06/09/2021
HMO Authorization Date: 06/09/2021
Comments
Comment: Approved funding for Shasta County, City of Redding, Redding Centerville Community Services District Generator Project for $225,000.00.

Date: 06/09/2021 User Id: SSCOTT39
Authorizing Official Signature Authorizing Official Title Authorization Date Authorizing Official Signature Authorizing Official Title Authorization Date

FEMA
Project Number
Amendment State Recipient
Number
Disaster App ID
Number
3 -R
Redding
089-59920
Subrecipient:

FIPS Code: Project Title : Redding Centerville Community Services District Generator Project 4382 0 131 CA Statewide
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY HMGP-AP-01

HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM
06/10/2021
11:22 AM
Project Management Report
Approved Amounts
Total Approved
Net Eligible
Total Approved
Non-Fed Share Amount
Federal
Share Percent
Non-Federal
Share Percent
Total Approved
Federal Share Amount
$300,000.00 75.000000000 $225,000.00 25.00000000 $75,000.00 FY
Allocations
Allocation
Number
IFMIS
Status
Proj Alloc Amount
Fed Share
IFMIS
Date
Submission
Date

ES/DFSC
Support Req
ID

ES/DFSC
Amend Nr
Total
Alloc Amount
Subrecipient
Management Cost
23 A 06/09/2021 06/09/2021 2021 3231152 10 $225,000.00 $0.00 $225,000.00 Total $225,000.00 $0.00 $225,000.00
Work Schedule Status
Amend # Description Time Frame Due Date Revised Date Completion Date 0 Kick off, 90% design, Coorsdination Meetings 3 months 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 0 Final contract drawing development 2 months 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 0 Bid advertisement, bid opening, award, contract execution 3 months 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 0 Construction - Submittal review and equipment procurement 7 months 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 0 Construction- Site, trenching and conduit installation 2 weeks 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 0 Construction - Concrete foundation 1 month 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 0 Construction - Generator installation 1 week 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 0 Construction - Complete punch list 1 week 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 0 Construction - Dunctional testing anf acceptance 1 week 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 0 Construction - Demobilization 1 week 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 0 Record drawing anf equipment manuals 2 weeks 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 0 Project close-out 1 month 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 0 Grant close-out 3 months 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 00/00/0000 Approved
Project Title :

Recipient Place Code :

Recipient Place Name :

Recipient County Code :

Recipient County Name :

Recipient :

Project Closeout Date :
89 Shasta
Statewide
Redding
0 00/00/0000
Redding Centerville Community Services District Generator Project Subrecipient Place Code :

Subrecipient Place Name :

Subrecipient County Code :

Subrecipient County Name :

Subrecipient :
59920
Redding
Shasta
89 Redding
Approval Status: Approved
Mitigation Project Description
Amendment Status :

FEMA
Project Number
Amendment State Recipient
Number
Disaster App ID
Number
3 -R
Redding
089-59920
Subrecipient:

FIPS Code: Project Title : Redding Centerville Community Services District Generator Project 4382 0 131 CA Statewide
FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY HMGP-AP-01

HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM
06/10/2021
11:22 AM
Project Management Report
Obligations
Action
Nr
IFMIS
Status
IFMIS
Date
SFS
Amend
Number
Submission
Date FY
SFS
Support
Req ID
Project Obligated
Amt - Fed Share
Total Obligated
Amount
Subrecipient
Management Cost
Suppl
Nr
1 A 06/10/202106/09/2021 2021 3572429 0 38 $225,000.00 $0.00 $225,000.00 Total $225,000.00 $0.00 $225,000.00

02/22/2021 REC-01 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
17:33:29

RECORD OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION (REC)
Project
Title:

HMGP 4382-131-03
Muletown Pump - Centerville CSD
Non Compliant Flag:

Level:

EA Draft Date: EA Final Date:

EA Public Notice Date: EA Fonsi
EIS Notice of Intent EIS ROD Date:

No
CATEX
Comment The Centerville Community Services District (Subapplicant) proposes to install a standby generator (approximately 350 kilowatts [kW]) and automatic transfer switch (ATS) at the Muletown Pump Station (MTPS) to provide a backup power supply and mitigate the risk of an outage at the MTPS, The MTPS is west and adjacent to the City of Redding in Shasta County (40.515609, -122.517394).

This project would require minor demolition work to modify the existing motor control center to accept the new ATS. Additionally, the existing generator J-Box (on the outside-west wall of the existing building) would be removed, along with all exposed conduits and conductors. A cast-in-place concrete support pad (approximately 6 feet wide by 18 feet long and 8 to 12 inches deep) would be required for the new generator. Approximately 10 feet of new conduit would be installed in a trench via open trench method between the existing generator J-Box to the new generator; at least 24 inches of imported gravel backfill would be used for cover. All proposed work and the construction staging area would be on a previously graded site and paved parking area, both previously disturbed areas. The project would affect less than 1 acre in area.

The project would not occur within a regulatory floodway or floodplain or near wetlands. As such, no impacts on floodplains or wetlands are anticipated.

This project has been determined to be Categorically Excluded from the need to prepare either an Environmental Impact Statement or Environmental Assessment in accordance with FEMA Instruction 108-1-1 and FEMA Directive 108-1-1 as authorized by DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Revision

1. Categorical Exclusion N18 (Federal Assistance for Construction or Installation of Structures, Facilities, or Equipment to Ensure Continuity of Operations) has been applied. Particular attention should be given to the project conditions before and during project implementation. Failure to comply with these conditions may jeopardize federal assistance including funding. - eargirof - 02/22/2021 16:56:33 GMT

NEPA DETERMINATION
Catex Category Code Description Selected
(*n18) Federal Assistance for Construction or Installation of Structures, Facilities, or Equipment to Ensure Continuity of Operations. Federal assistance for the construction or installation of measures for the purpose of ensuring the continuity of operations during incidents such as emergencies, disasters, flooding, and power outages involving less than one acre of ground disturbance.

Examples include the installation of generators, installation of storage tanks of up to 10,000 gallons, installation of pumps, construction of structures to house emergency equipment, and utility line installation. This CATEX covers associated ground disturbing activities, such as trenching, excavation, and vegetation removal of less than one acre, as well as modification of existing structures.
*n18 Yes

CATEX CATEGORIES
Extraordinary Circumstance Code Description Selected ?
No Extraordinary Circumstances were selected

EXTRAORDINARY
NOTE: All times are GMT using a 24-hour clock. Page 1 of 5 Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) 02/22/2021 REC-01 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
17:33:29

RECORD OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION (REC)
Project
Title:

HMGP 4382-131-03
Muletown Pump - Centerville CSD
Environmental Law/
Executive Order Status Description Comment
Clean Air Act (CAA) Project is located in an attainment area - Review concluded
The project is in Shasta County, which is within
an attainment area for all criteria pollutants
according to the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (USEPA)
(https://www3.epa.gov/airquality/greenbook/ancl.
html), updated January 31, 2021. Based on the
scope of work, the potential emissions from
project activities would be below "de minimis"
thresholds for the General Conformity Rule.

Thus, the project is exempt from a conformity
determination. See Condition. - eargirof -
02/22/2021 17:06:14 GMT
Completed
Coastal Barrier Resources Act
(CBRA)
Project is not on or connected to CBRA Unit
or otherwise protected area - Review
concluded
Completed
Clean Water Act (CWA) Project would not affect any water of the U.S. - Review concluded
The National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) does not
identify any streams, waterbodies, or wetlands in
the project area. This project would not affect
Waters of the U.S. and, therefore, coordination
with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is not
required for this project. - eargirof - 02/22/2021
17:04:40 GMT
Completed
Coastal Zone Management Act
(CZMA)
Project is not located in a coastal zone area
and does not affect a coastal zone area -
Review concluded
The project site is not in a coastal zone area and
would not affect a coastal zone area. - eargirof -
02/22/2021 17:05:18 GMT
Completed
Executive Order 11988 -
Floodplains
No effect on floodplain/flood levels and
project outside floodplain - Review concluded
Based on the FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM) panel 06089C1525G (effective March 17,
2011), all project activities would occur in an
area of minimal flood hazard (Zone X). The 8-
Step process for floodplains is not required. -
eargirof - 02/22/2021 17:23:00 GMT
Completed
Executive Order 11990 -
Wetlands
No effects on wetlands and project outside
wetlands - Review concluded
Review of the USFWS National Wetlands
Inventory database (reviewed December 1,
2020) indicates that project activities are not
within or would not affect wetland resources. -
eargirof - 02/22/2021 17:24:45 GMT
Completed
Executive Order 12898 -
Environmental Justice for Low
Income and Minority Populations
Low income or minority population in or near
project area
According to the Environmental Protection
Agency's (EPA) Environmental Justice
Screening and Mapping Tool (Version 2020), low
income and minority populations are within 1
mile of the project site. This project would not
result in disproportionately high or adverse
impacts on low income or minority populations. -
eargirof - 02/22/2021 17:26:54 GMT
Completed
No disproportionately high and adverse
impact on low income or minority population -
Review concluded
Completed

ENVIRONMENTAL LAW / EXECUTIVE ORDER
NOTE: All times are GMT using a 24-hour clock. Page 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) 02/22/2021 REC-01 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
17:33:29

RECORD OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION (REC)
Project
Title:

HMGP 4382-131-03
Muletown Pump - Centerville CSD
Environmental Law/
Executive Order Status Description Comment
Endangered Species Act (ESA) Listed species and/or designated critical habitat present in areas affected directly or
indirectly by the federal action
Per biological review conducted by Moncie
Wright, a biologist with CDM Smith, this project
would not destroy or adversely modify suitable
habitat and would not affect other listed or
proposed species or critical habitat under the
jurisdiction of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS). It is therefore determined the project
would have No Effect on listed species and
consultation with the USFWS under Section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act is not required. -
eargirof - 02/22/2021 17:03:01 GMT
Completed
No effect to species or designated critical
habitat (See comments for justification) -
Review concluded
Completed
Farmland Protection Policy Act
(FPPA)
Project does not affect designated prime or
unique farmland - Review concluded
According to the California Department of
Conservation California Important Farmland
Finder
(https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/),
the project is not within an area designated as
farmland of statewide significance. - eargirof -
02/22/2021 17:08:03 GMTAccording to the
California Department of Conservation California
Important Farmland Finder
(https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/),
the project is not within an area designated as
farmland of statewide significance. - eargirof -
02/22/2021 17:11:01 GMT
Completed
Fish and Wildlife Coordination
Act (FWCA)
Project does not affect, control, or modify a
waterway/body of water - Review concluded
Completed
Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) Project located within a flyway zone The project is in the Pacific Flyway; however, based on the activities associated with this
scope of work, no take of migratory birds would
occur. - eargirof - 02/22/2021 17:11:34 GMT
Completed
Project does not have potential to take
migratory birds - Review concluded
Completed
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management
Act (MSA)
Project located in or near Essential Fish
Habitat
Based on a review of the National Marine
Fisheries Service Essential Fish Habitat (EFH)
Mapper and the NOAA Fisheries Protected
Resources App, Chinook salmon and steelhead
EFH habitat is present in Clear Creek, which is
approximately 0.4 miles from the project area.

The project area is less than 1 acre, there would
be no surface grading, and erosion-creating
activities would be limited to a 4-day period.

Once construction is completed, there would be
no project elements susceptible to erosion. The
Subapplicant
Completed
NOTE: All times are GMT using a 24-hour clock. Page 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) 02/22/2021 REC-01 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
17:33:29

RECORD OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION (REC)
Project
Title:

HMGP 4382-131-03
Muletown Pump - Centerville CSD
Environmental Law/
Executive Order Status Description Comment
will comply with State-mandated requirements
associated with construction erosion control. Due
to the limited period that soil destabilization may
occur, the size of the project area, and the
distance from the closest EFH, no effects on
EFH are anticipated. Further, no project activities
would take place in or adjacent to existing
stream channels. - eargirof - 02/22/2021
17:13:03 GMT
Project does not adversely affect Essential
Fish Habitat - Review concluded
Completed
National Historic Preservation Act
(NHPA)
Applicable executed Programmatic
Agreement. Activity meets Programmatic
Allowance (enter date and # in comments) -
Review concluded
The Undertaking was reviewed by Anmarie
Medin, MA, an archaeologist, of Pacific Legacy,
Inc., who meets the applicable Secretary of the
Interior's Professional Qualifications in
accordance with Stipulation I.B.1.a of the
October 2019 Programmatic Agreement
(Agreement) among the Federal Emergency
Management Agency, the California State
Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO), and the
California Governor's Office of Emergency
Services (Cal OES). Review by an architectural
historian was not necessary. The Undertaking
meets the following Programmatic Allowances in
Appendix B of the Agreement: Tier II Allowance
II.B.3.a (upgrades/modifications to existing
electrical buildings); Tier II Allowance II.D.1.b
(new electrical conduit from the existing building
to the new generator pad); and Tier II Allowance
II.D.2.a (generator installation). Thus, the
Undertaking does not require SHPO review or
notification per Stipulation II.A.1 of the 2019
Agreement. - eargirof - 02/22/2021 16:59:22
GMT
Completed
Wild and Scenic Rivers Act
(WSR)
Project is not along and does not affect Wild
and Scenic River - Review concluded
The nearest Wild and Scenic River is Trinity
River, which is 20 miles northwest of the project
area. Based on the distance to the project, no
direct or adverse impacts are anticipated from
implementation of this project. - eargirof -
02/22/2021 17:13:27 GMT
Completed
Special Conditions required on implementation of Projects:

CONDITIONS
NOTE: All times are GMT using a 24-hour clock. Page 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) 02/22/2021 REC-01 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY
17:33:30

RECORD OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION (REC)
Project
Title:

HMGP 4382-131-03
Muletown Pump - Centerville CSD
Clean Air Act (CAA)
The Subapplicant is responsible for complying with all applicable subparts of the Clean Air Act. Failure to comply with this condition may jeopardize federal assistance, including funding. Any change to the approved scope of work will require re-evaluation for compliance with the Clean Air Act.

Source of condition: Monitoring Required: No
Standard Conditions:

Any change to the approved scope of work will require re-evaluation for compliance with NEPA and other Laws and Executive Orders.

This review does not address all federal, state and local requirements. Acceptance of federal funding requires recipient to comply with all federal, state and local laws. Failure to obtain all appropriate federal, state and local environmental permits and clearances may jeopardize federal funding.

If ground disturbing activities occur during construction, applicant will monitor ground disturbance and if any potential archeological resources are discovered, will immediately cease construction in that area and notify the State and FEMA.

NOTE: All times are GMT using a 24-hour clock. Page 5 of 5 Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) 1 Standard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP) Conditions
FEMA Region IX, August, 2018
The following list applies to Recipients and Subrecipients accepting HMGP funds from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS):

1. Applicable Federal, State, and Local Laws and Regulations. The Recipient/Subrecipient must comply with all applicable Federal, State, and Local laws and regulations, regardless of whether they are on this list or other project documents. DHS financial assistance Recipients and Subrecipients are required to follow the provisions of the State HMGP Administrative Plan, applicable Hazard Mitigation Assistance Uniform Guidance, and Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards located in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 200, adopted by DHS in 2 CFR 3002.

2. Financial Management Systems. The Recipient and Subrecipient must maintain financial management systems to account for and track funds, as referenced in 2 CFR 200.302.

3. Match or Cost Share. Non-federal match or cost share must comply with 2 CFR 200.306, the scope of work (SOW), and any agreements among the Subrecipient, the Recipient, and FEMA.

4. Budget Changes. Unanticipated adjustments are permitted within the approved total cost. However, if costs exceed the federal share, the Subrecipient must notify the Governor’s Authorized Representative (GAR) of overruns before implementation. The GAR shall submit a written request for approval to FEMA Region IX. The subaward must continue to meet HMGP requirements, including cost effectiveness and cost share. Refer to 2 CFR 200.308 for additional information.

5. Real Property and Land. The acquisition, use, and disposition must comply with 2 CFR 200.311.

6. Equipment. The acquisition, use, and disposition must comply with 2 CFR 200.313.

7. Supplies. Upon project completion, FEMA must be compensated for unused supplies, exceeding $5,000 (fair market value), and not needed for other federal programs. Refer to 2 CFR 200.314.

8. Procurement. Procurement procedures must be in conformance with 2 CFR 200.318-320.

9. Monitoring and Reporting Program Performance. The Recipient and Subrecipient must submit quarterly progress reports, as referenced in the 2 CFR 200.328 and State HMGP Administrative Plan.

10. Records Retention. In accordance with 2 CFR 200.333, financial/ programmatic records related to expenditures must be maintained at least 3 years after the date of Recipient’s final expenditure report.

11. Enforcement and Termination. If the Recipient or Subrecipient fails to comply with the award or subaward terms, whether stated in a Federal statute or regulation, the State HMGP Administrative Plan, subpplication, a notice of award, an assurance, or elsewhere, FEMA may take one or more of the actions outlined in 2 CFR 200.338, including termination or partial termination of the award or subaward outlined in 2 CFR 200.339.

12. Allowable Costs. Funds are to be used for allowable costs in compliance with 2 CFR 200.403, the approved SOW, and any agreements among the Subrecipient, Recipient, and FEMA.

Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) 2 13. Non-Federal Audit. The Recipient and Subrecipient are responsible for obtaining audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984, in compliance with 2 CFR 200.501.

14. Debarred and Suspended Parties. Recipients and Subrecipients are subject to the non-procurement debarment and suspension regulations implementing Executive Orders 12549 and 12689, and 2 CFR 180. These regulations restrict federal financial assistance awards, subawards, and contracts with parties that are debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded from or ineligible for participation in the federal assistance programs or activities.

15. Equipment Rates. Rates claimed for use of Subrecipient-owned equipment in excess of the FEMAapproved rates must be approved under State guidelines issued by the State Comptroller's Office or must be certified by the Recipient to include only those costs attributable to equipment usage less any fixed overhead and/or profit.

16. Duplication of Funding between Public Assistance (PA) and HMGP. Funding for PA Section 406 and HMGP Section 404 are permitted on the same facility/location, but the activities identified under each program must be distinct with separately accounted funds. At closeout, FEMA may adjust the funding to ensure the Subrecipient was reimbursed for eligible work from only one funding source.

17. Historic Properties and Cultural Resources. In compliance with 2 CFR 800, if a potential historic property or cultural resource is discovered during construction, the Subrecipient must cease work in the area and take all reasonable measures to avoid or minimize harm to the discovered property/resource. During construction, the Subrecipient will monitor ground disturbance activity, and if any potential archeological resources are discovered, will immediately cease work in that area, and notify the Recipient and FEMA. Construction in the area may resume with FEMA’s written approval after FEMA’s consultation, if applicable, with the State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO).

18. NEPA and Changes to the Scope of Work (SOW). To comply with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and other Laws and Executive Orders, any change to the approved SOW shall be re-evaluated before implementation. Construction associated with a SOW change, prior to FEMA approval, may be ineligible for funding. Acceptance of federal funding requires environmental permits and clearances in compliance with all appropriate federal, state and local laws, and failure to comply may jeopardize funding.

Within their authority, the Recipient and Subrecipient must use of all practicable means, consistent with other essential policies, to create and maintain productive harmony for people and nature, and fulfill the social, economic, and other needs of present and future generations of Americans.

Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD) Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: NOE HMGP Project Agreement (4.11(a)--Approve Reso and Hazard Mitigation Grant Program Agreement w/ CCSD)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals No. 5385, to provide engineering and environmental services for the Churn Creek Road, Victor Avenue, and Rancho Road Roundabout Project:
(1) Award the Consultant and Professional Services Contract to Dokken Engineering Inc., in an amount not to exceed $1,243,029;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the contract with Dokken Engineering; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $50,000.

Fiscal Impact
Total project cost for the Churn Creek Road, Victor Avenue, and Rancho Road Roundabout Project (Roundabout Project) is estimated to be roughly $6 million including design, environmental clearance and permitting, right-of-way, construction and construction management. The required professional services to prepare the project for construction is estimated to cost approximately $1.25 million. There are adequate Citywide Transportation Impact Fee funds budgeted for the proposed Consulting and Professional Services Contract (Contract).

Alternative Action
The City Council (City) may choose not to award the contract for this project. This alternative would require staff to reprioritize several City of Redding (City) capital improvement projects and reallocate resources to complete plans and specifications for this project in order to move forward, which could delay the delivery of other City projects. In addition, the existing traffic conditions may worsen with growth and the solutions to improve the traffic operations and safety of this corridor will be delayed.

MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for Engineering and Environmental Services for the Churn Creek Road, Victor Avenue, and Rancho Road Roundabout Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 122
Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution Page 2 Background/Analysis
The roundabout project was identified in 2008 as a needed improvement to accommodate the anticipated rapid progression of commercial and residential development in the area. In October 2017, the Council authorized the Public Works Department to begin project development. Staff used the recommendation from the 2006 Project Alternatives Report for the design of a roundabout at Churn Creek Road, Victor Avenue, and Rancho Road which allowed a consultant to prepare and complete a 30% Design Report in February 2019.

The project involves the design of a four-leg, single lane roundabout which will provide safe and sustainable transportation, accommodate traffic volumes associated with the current and projected development, and comply with the City’s General Plan transportation standards. The project will also provide improved connectivity between residential neighborhoods and destinations such as grocery stores, restaurants, outdoor recreation and other shopping centers.

There is currently no contiguous active transportation network due to multiple sidewalk gaps, inconsistent bike lanes, congested and closely spaced intersections, and unpaved trails. However, one goal of this project is to improve all of these deficiencies by completing the following improvements: construct shared use paths, eliminate sidewalk gaps, install accessible curb ramps, add buffered bike lanes, and install safety lighting.

Consultant Selection Process
Five staff members from the Public Works Department formed a review and selection panel. The panel’s evaluation was based on the Request for Proposals selection criteria and the consultants’ abilities and qualifications to perform all phases of the engineering and environmental services required.

On July 7, 2023, two proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received. The panel members evaluated and scored each proposal based on the consultants’ understanding of the project/scope, project’s team experience with similar types of projects and City projects, experience and qualifications of the team, ability to develop project solutions, project schedule, and geographic location of the team. The panel ranked the firms based on its scores as follows:

Firm Rank
Dokken Engineering Inc. 1
GHD, Inc. 2
Following the evaluation and ranking, Dokken Engineering’s proposed fees were opened, evaluated, and negotiated to include reasonable costs based on the scope of services as well as previous similar project cost comparisons.

The consultant fee is estimated and payments will be for actual work performed on a not-toexceed basis. However, staff recommends the approval of an additional $50,000 in contingency reserve. Contingency funds may be necessary due to unforeseen project design issues. If the contingency reserve needs to be utilized, an amendment would be negotiated with the consultant and the contract would be modified with approval of the City Manager.

The attached professional services contract with Dokken Engineering, is approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Packet Pg. 123
Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution Page 3 Environmental Review
Consultant selection is not a project defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The consultant will provide design and technical study information necessary to ensure environmental compliance as the project progresses.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in community.”
Attachments
^Location Map
Agreement
Packet Pg. 124

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

EXHIBIT A

CHURN CREEK RD, VICTOR AVE &

RANCHO RD ROUNDABOUT PROJECT PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

EL VERANO ST FIDDLENECK DR AMANDA DR

FILAREE DR

DAPPLE GRAY DR ALTA SAGA DR

LARIAT LN

PROJECT

LOCATION

RANCHO RD

VICTOR AVE
CHURN CREEK RD DEBBIE LN X:\Projects\ChrnCrkVictorRancho_Roundabout_2618\Design\Plans\Drawings\Location Map.dwg, Exhibit CC 8x11 Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 128
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 129
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 135
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 136
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: Agreement (4.11(b)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5385 and Authorize Execution)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept update regarding the City of Redding’s COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package projects.

Fiscal Impact
The City Council (Council) previously approved an allocation of $9 million in Greenhouse Gas Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for projects that reap an energy savings benefit to the City of Redding (City). To date, the City Manager has authorized purchases and projects totaling over $3.6 million and a consulting services agreement for engineering and construction management support of more than $1.2 million. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to accept the project status report and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On April 21, 2020, the Council unanimously approved the City’s Economic Response Plan.

Included in the plan, is the allocation of $9 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for several projects associated with the Local Economic Stimulus Package that equates to a savings in energy costs for the City. On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized the City Manager to execute agreements, purchase orders, and contracts associated with the program to ensure an expedited delivery schedule. The Council also directed staff to provide regular status updates on the program and ratify all City Manager awards.

MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 157
Report to Redding City Council September 13, 2023
Re: 4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update Page 2 As directed by the City Manager, staff has endeavored to break up most of the work into smaller contracts, with values lower than $500,000, with the idea that local contractors and vendors will compete better due to lack of mobilization costs and other local advantages. However, the City has limited control because these are Public Works contracts and must be awarded to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder in accordance with State of California law.

To date, staff has awarded 15 projects totaling more than $3.6 million that include:
• Projects for lighting improvements at sport fields, the Library, Corporation Yard, City Hall, the Police Department, the Civic Auditorium, fire stations, and various other City buildings;
• Projects to install solar power generation systems;
• Replacing roofs at various fire stations; and
• Purchase orders and on-call contract services for lighting, plumbing, mechanical work, and equipment.

Thirteen projects have been completed, and nine of the 15 projects have been awarded to contractors with local offices.

The design consultant and staff are finalizing bid packages for the Aquatic Center Pumping System Upgrades Project and for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning projects at City Hall, the Police Department, and the Corporation Yard. Construction of the lighting project at the Civic Auditorium continues to experience delays as a result of long lead times for material. The attached Project Status Report provides more detailed information on project status and costs.

Staff will continue to return to the Council quarterly to provide progress updates, with the next update is anticipated to be December 19, 2023.

Environmental Review
Accepting the project status report is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. The individual projects within this report may be subject to CEQA guidelines and are individually analyzed.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Project Status Report
Previous Staff Report 05-05-20
Previous Staff Report 04-21-20
Packet Pg. 158
Project # Description Project Type Contract Method
Award/PO
Date
Ratification
Date Contractor
Local Contractor,
Sub, or Supplier? Cost Est Actual Cost
$ to Local
Contractors
Estimated
Completion
Date
Acceptance
Date Project Status

PROJECTS IN CONSTRUCTION
C19-S-02 Solar PV & Replace Roofs at Various Fire Stations (Stations 2, 4, 5, and 6) Solar Standard Bid 11/23/2021 12/21/2021 Harbert Roofing, Inc. Yes $ 525,610 $ 426,213 $ 426,213 9/30/2023 Completing inspections and punch-list items.

C19-L-06 LED Lighting Retrofit at Civic Auditorium Lighting Standard Bid 11/23/2021 12/21/2021 Fluoresco Services, LLC No $ 162,111 $ 77,387 $ - 12/1/2023 Construction delayed due to material lead times.

PROJECTS IN DESIGN
C19-M-03 Upgrade HVAC at City Hall & Police Department HVAC Standard Bid $ 888,430 2/1/2024 Jacobs's preparing final design package.

C19-M-04 Upgrade HVAC at Caldwell Park Rec Center HVAC Standard Bid $ 120,000 2/1/2024 City working with on-call contractor for improvement options.

C19-M-05 Upgrade HVAC at Corp Yard HVAC Standard Bid $ 195,000 3/15/2024 Jacobs preparing design package.

C19-P-03 Upgrade Pumping Control System at the Aquatic Center Plumbing Standard Bid $ 150,000 3/1/2024 Jacobs preparing final design package.

C19-S-03 Solar PV & Replace Roofs - Fire Stations 1 and 3 Solar Standard Bid $ 250,000 TBD Design on hold until future plan for these fire stations is determined.

C19-W-04a Replace Windows at Fire Station 5 Windows Standard Bid $ 16,000 11/1/2023 City working on a purchase order with a local contractor to perform this work.

C19-W-04b Replace Windows at Fire Stations 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 Windows Standard Bid $ 153,000 TBD Design on hold until future plan for the fire stations is determined.

C19-M-06 Replace HVAC at Civic Auditorium HVAC Standard Bid $ 3,500,000 TBD Design on hold until City can determine if budget will be available.

C19-S-04 Install Solar and Replace Roof at Civic Auditorium Solar Standard Bid $ 1,600,000 TBD Design on hold until City can determine if budget will be available.

PROJECTS COMPLETE
C19-L-01 LED Lighting Retrofit at three Non Profit Buildings at Diestelhorst Landing. Lighting On-Call Contract 6/9/2020 7/21/2020 B&C Yes $ 48,000 $ 13,000 $ 13,000 7/9/2020 7/31/2020 Construction completed.

C19-L-02 LED Lighting Retrofit at Library Lighting Standard Bid 11/19/2020 12/15/2020 Clear Blue Energy Corp. No $ 194,263 $ 53,633 $ - 3/1/2021 2/22/2021 Construction completed.

C19-L-03 LED Lighting Retrofit at Corp Yard Lighting Standard Bid 12/15/2020 1/19/2021 Fluoresco Services, LLC No $ 391,117 $ 137,294 $ - 6/22/2021 8/6/2021 Construction completed.

C19-L-04 LED Lighting Retrofit at City Hall and Police Station Lighting Standard Bid 8/2/2021 8/17/2021 Fluoresco Services, LLC No $ 519,000 $ 189,367 $ - 10/1/2022 9/20/2022 Construction completed.

C19-L-05
LED Lighting Retrofit at Various Locations (Aquatic Center, Caldwell Park, Fire Stations, MLK Jr Center, Enterprise Park, Old City Hall, Senior Citizens Hall, and California Soccer Park)
Lighting Standard Bid 6/2/2022 6/21/2022 Advanced Lighting Services, Inc.

No $ 386,077 $ 145,255 $ - 1/31/2023 2/1/2023 Construction completed.

C19-PO-01 Sourcewell purchase order for stadium lighting (Equipment Only) at Alta Mesa Park, Softball Park, South City Park, Buckeye Park, and Caldwell Park Stadium Lighting Purchase Order
(Equipment Only) 7/16/2020 7/21/2020 Musco No $ 1,227,941 $ 1,227,941 $ - 12/31/2022 2/8/2023 Purchase order with Musco for equipment. Projects complete.

C19-LS-01 Installation of City purchased stadium lighting equipment at Alta Mesa Park, Softball park, South City Park Kiwanis 1, and Tiger Field Stadium Lighting Standard Bid
(Installation Only) 3/31/2021 4/20/2021 Builders Solutions, Inc. Yes $ 465,014 $ 750,691 $ 750,691 12/31/2022 2/8/2023 Construction completed.

C19-LS-02 Installation of City purchased stadium lighting equipment at Buckeye Park and Caldwell Park
Stadium Lighting Standard Bid
(Installation Only) 2/17/2021 3/16/2021 Builders Solutions, Inc. Yes $ 341,500 $ 319,647 $ 319,647 4/25/2022 5/10/2022 Construction completed.

C19-P-01 Replace Water Heaters in Fire Stations 2, 3, 4, and 6 Plumbing On-Call Contract 6/30/2020 7/21/2020 American Leak Detection Yes $ 49,000 $ 13,050 $ 13,050 9/16/2020 10/2/2020 Construction completed.

C19-P-02 Replace Laundry Facilities in Fire Stations 2, 3, 5, 7, and 8 Plumbing On-Call Contract 6/25/2020 7/21/2020 American Leak Detection Yes $ 17,000 $ 12,759 $ 12,759 9/16/2020 10/2/2020 Construction completed.

C19-M-01 Replace HVAC Units in Fire Stations 1,2,4,6 HVAC On-Call Contract 6/9/2020 7/21/2020 ACCO Yes $ 92,109 $ 95,278 $ 95,278 12/1/2020 11/30/2020 Construction completed.

C19-M-02 Replace HVAC Units in Old City Hall HVAC On-Call Contract 6/15/2020 7/21/2020 ACCO Yes $ 135,755 $ 97,985 $ 97,985 1/20/2021 1/13/2021 Construction completed.

C19-S-01 Solar PV at Fire Stations 7 & 8 Solar Standard Bid 9/29/2021 10/19/2021 B & B Solar Inc. Yes $ 100,529 $ 98,900 $ 105,900 8/1/2023 8/30/2023 Construction completed.

Sub Total: $ 11,527,456 $ 3,658,399 $ 1,834,523

PROJECT MANAGEMENT/DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES C-19-DC-01 Project Management, Design and Construction Services Engineering Consultant PSA 6/9/2020 7/21/2020 Jacobs Engineering Yes $ 1,240,816 On-going design and construction management services Total $ 12,768,272 $ 3,658,399 $ 1,834,523
Project Budget $9 M. Projects will be prioritized and delivered to fit within approved budget
Energy Efficiency Economic Response Plan (EEERP) Project Status Report Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: ^Project Status Report (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the City Manager to award any public works contract, purchase order, or agreements, of any value, associated with the $9.5 million GHG funding approved as part of the Local Economic Stimulus Package.

Fiscal Impact
The City Council has previously approved the allocation of $9.5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for projects that reap an energy savings benefit to the City of Redding. There is no further fiscal impact to granting authority to the City Manager to execute the agreements, purchase orders, and contracts associated with these projects. There may, however, be an added benefit of seeing the money infused more rapidly into the local economy.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements, purchase orders, or contracts associated with the Cap and Trade distribution funds to expedite delivery of the work. This would lengthen the process to use the authorized funding.

Background/Analysis
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020, the City Council unanimously approved the Economic Response Plan. Included in the plan is the allocation of $9.5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for projects associated with the Local Economic Stimulus Package that equate to a savings in energy costs for the City of Redding. By authorizing the City Manager to negotiate, execute, and direct the agreements, purchase orders and contracts, staff can proceed with rapidly assigning the work and awarding bids. The benefit to this is being able to see the Cap and Trade action proceeds go to work as soon as possible in the community, and thereby providing the local MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 9.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(b)--Consider authorizing the City Manager to award energy savings contracts, purchase orders, and agreements related to the Green House Gas (GHG) funding approved by the City Council as part of the Local Economic Stimulus.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 160 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 05-05-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 9.1(b)--Authorize City Manager to award energy savings contracts Page 2 economy a direct opportunity to see a quick positive impact to jobs and business activity. The projects within the package may include, , LED light replacement in City facilities, reroofing and some solar installation at Fire Stations, replacing largely older and heavy energy using equipment with newer more efficient equipment, and additional energy saving projects to be determined
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
 Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
 Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”  Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
 Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
 Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 05-05-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the City of Redding Economic Response Plan and provide direction to staff as follows:
(1) Approve deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) hotels and motels. (2) Approve modification of existing Community Assistance for Redding Electric Services (CARES) guidelines.
(3) Approve modification of amortization policy for City of Redding utility bills. (4) Approve the refund of all City of Redding utility deposits. (5) Rescind approval of allocation of Cap and Trade funds for the Wildfire Mitigation and Building Electrification programs; approve Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be distributed to electric customers; and adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 32nd Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 to appropriate a total of $9 million in Greenhouse Gas allotment for utility rebates. (6) Approve adoption of a utility grant program for small businesses utilizing $600,000 of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding.
(7) Economic Stimulus Package
a. Approve additional use of $5 million of Greenhouse Gas allotment and adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 33rd Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 allocating money for projects designated as providing energy savings for the general fund.
b. Provide direction on projects involving utilities funding and borrowing.

Fiscal Impact
The amount of impact of this proposal depends on the City Council’s (Council) direction for staff. The programs implemented thus far are expected to impact the General Fund due to approximately $500,000 in missed revenue projections. Programs such as modifying the Amortization Program guidelines and deferring Transient Occupancy Tax will reduce reserves in the short term by providing cash flow relief to businesses. Using restricted revenue funds to modify existing CARES program guidelines, and also refunding City of Redding utility deposits MEETING DATE: April 21, 2020
ITEM NO. 9.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(b)--Consider Economic Response Plan related to the Covid-19 pandemic's impact on the City and provide direction regarding mitigation measures.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Report to Redding City Council April 16, 2020
Re: 9.1(b)--Economic Response Plan Page 2
and creating a utility grant program for small business will not impact unrestricted reserves. If the additional utility credit is approved, $9 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds would need to be allocated, some of which would be reallocated from previously funded projects, to bring the total allocation to $11 million for utility rebates. To complete projects listed in the Local Economic Stimulus Package, $5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds would need to be allocated in addition to the $4 million already allocated. The Council could also, through approval of this report, provide direction and identify an amount of money to reserve to pay for any potential borrowing for projects that would be approved through the Local Economic Stimulus Package.

Alternative Action
The Council has multiple options with this report. If it chooses to not accept the report in its entirety, all currently implemented programs would cease and no additional community assistance programming would take place at this time. The Council could choose to accept the report, and therefore all of the currently implemented projects as well, and provide direction to staff regarding which new projects to move forward.

Background/Analysis
The Covid-19 global pandemic has been a health catastrophe causing significant disruption in individual, community and societal norms while devastating the economy. The City of Redding, as the local governmental entity, needs to take bold action in line with the State and Federal Government to not only protect the health and welfare of the individual but also of the economy.

The City of Redding City Council will be presented with a number of proposed initiatives and projects to help individuals and businesses through this difficult time. The attached City of Redding Economic Response Plan is a report detailing programming currently implemented, as well as programming that could be implemented to assist the community. These items are varied in cost and source of funding.

Currently implementing
 Maintain City services
 Suspend Return to Owner fees for impounded animals
 Suspend late fees and interest on payments due to the City of Redding  Suspend City of Redding utility shut-offs due to non-payment  Suspend City of Redding utility payment late fees
 Cap and Trade distribution of $50 to every Redding Electric Utility (REU) account holder
Pending approval
 Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax payment from hotel and motel businesses  Modify existing –Community Assistance for Redding Electric Services (CARES) program guidelines to provide opportunity for additional financial assistance to qualifying utility customers
 Modify Utilities Amortization program guidelines to extend the amortization period, and extend the program to commercial customers
 Refund City of Redding utility deposits to residential and commercial customers  Additional Cap and Trade distribution of $200 to every REU account holder  Utility grant program for small businesses
 Local Economic Stimulus Package containing multiple projects that will result in local contract work opportunities and energy savings to the City of Redding Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Report to Redding City Council April 16, 2020
Re: 9.1(b)--Economic Response Plan Page 3
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
 Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
 Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”  Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
 Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
 Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Resolution - GHG Customer Distribution
Resolution - Green House Gas Allotment
COR Economic Response Plan 2020
Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Resolution No. 2020 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 32ND AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2019-050 RESCINDING

APPROVAL OF ALLOCATION OF CAP AND TRADE FUNDS FOR THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION AND BUILDING ELECTRIFICATION PROGRAMS; APPROVE THE APPROPRIATION OF $9,000,000 OF CAP AND TRADE AUCTION PROCEEDS TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO RATEPAYERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-20.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
142 854 GHG Customer Distribution $9,000,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease in Beginning Balance
142-851-01-0001-01 Beginning Balance $ 1,077,910
Decrease in Cap and Trade Revenues
142-851-01-4400-01 Environmental Attributes $ 2,022,090 Elimination of Building Electrification Project
142-854-8908-98 Building Electrification $ 4,000,000
Elimination of Wildfire Mitigation Project
142-854-8908-99 Wildfire Mitigation $ 1,900,000
Increase in GHG Customer Distribution
142-854-8908-90 GHG Customer Distribution $ 9,000,000
Total $ 9,000,000 $ 9,000,000
THAT the purpose is to rescind approval of allocation of Cap and Trade funds for the Wildfire Mitigation and Building Electrification programs; approve the appropriation of $9,000,000 of Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be distributed to ratepayers for fiscal year 2019-20.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of April, 2020 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ADAM McELVAIN, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Resolution No. 2020 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 33RD AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2019-050 APPROVE AND APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL USE OF $5,000,000 OF GREENHOUSE GAS

ALLOTMENT FOR PROJECTS DESIGNED AS PROVIDING ENERGY SAVINGS FOR THE GENERAL FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-20.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
142 854 Energy Efficiency Measures $5,000,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease in Beginning Balance
142-851-01-0001-01 Beginning Balance $ 5,000,000
Increase in Energy Efficiency Measures
142-854-8908-96 Energy Efficiency Measures $ 5,000,000
Total $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000
THAT the purpose is to approve and appropriate additional use of $5,000,000 of Greenhouse Gas allotment allocating money for projects designed as providing energy savings for the General Fund for fiscal year 2019-20.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 21st day of April, 2020 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ADAM McELVAIN, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 167 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Packet Pg. 168 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
1 Table of Contents
Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................................2 Plan Elements................................................................................................................................................2 Elements currently implemented .............................................................................................................2 Maintain City Services..........................................................................................................................2 Suspend Return to Owner fees............................................................................................................3 Suspend Late Fees and Interest on City Payments .............................................................................3 Suspend Utility Shut-Off ......................................................................................................................4 Suspend Utility Late Fees.....................................................................................................................4 Distribution of $50 to REU Account Holders.......................................................................................4 Pending the City Council’s approval .........................................................................................................4 Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax...................................................................................................5 Modify Existing CARES Program Guidelines........................................................................................5 Modify Utilities Amortization Program Guidelines.............................................................................5 Refund City of Redding Utilities Deposits............................................................................................6 Additional Cap and Trade Distribution................................................................................................6 Utility Grant Program for Small Businesses ........................................................................................6 Local Economic Stimulus Package........................................................................................................7 Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
2 Executive Summary
The Covid-19 global pandemic is a health catastrophe causing significant disruption in individual, community and societal norms. While the direct human suffering owed to the disease itself is horrific, the damage to the economy due to necessary health precautions is equally devastating. The City of Redding (City), as the local governmental entity, needs to take bold action in line with the State and Federal Government to not only protect the health and welfare of the individual but also that of the local economy. The City of Redding City Council (Council) has directed that a plan be developed to assist the community in economic recovery to coincide with the cessation of the pandemic. This report provides detailed information on the various programs that have been developed to help foster the economy through this economic disaster.

Some programs have already been implemented while others still need final approval from the City Council. In brief, the programs are listed below.

Currently implement Plan Element Value
Suspend Return to Owner fees $200
Suspend late fees and interest on City of
Redding payments
$60,000
Suspend City of Redding utility shut-offs Increased Cash Flow Suspend City of Redding utility late fees $425,000
Distribution of $50 to REU account holders $2,200,000
Plan Element Pending approval
Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax $250,000 Est. deferred Modify existing CARES program guidelines $1,500,000
Modify existing Utilities amortization
program guidelines
Increased Cash Flow
Refund City of Redding utility deposits $3,400,000
Additional Cap and Trade distribution $9,000,000
Utility grant program for small businesses $600,000
Local Economic Stimulus Package $20,000,000
Total Value of City Response Plan Est @ $37,500,000
Plan Elements
Elements currently implemented
Maintain City Services
City services provided to the community are critical in nature and are unable to cease in functionality. A multitude of projects, already in the works, have to continue processing in spite of the pandemic that has affected the nation. In order to keep projects moving forward, and to Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
3 continue to serve the community in this critical capacity, City departments implemented immediate changes to comply with State and Federal directives. Personnel able to work from home were provided resources to do so. Meetings of large groups of staff and/or the public were eliminated, and preparations were made to provide access to public meetings without further endangering the community. As a result of the rapid response of staff, City services continue to function for the bulk of the community. In spite of the closure of City Hall and the diminished personnel in the Avtech and Corp Yard buildings, and the Transfer Station, critical City services such as police, fire, electric, solid waste removal, water and wastewater maintenance, and parks services still operate to the benefit of the community. Each position, whether working from home or in the office, is a critical component of maintaining the support of these services. Department directors monitor work product and load to ensure the City continues to function efficiently. The City is providing increased availability of cleaning supplies and sanitizing materials to offices and meeting spaces to maintain worker health.

To provide additional relief to residents and business owners, several programming decisions were implemented. Taking into consideration the varied economic status of Redding residents and businesses, the following steps were taken to provide some help financially.

Suspend Return to Owner fees
Effective March 23, 2020, Haven Humane Society suspended the charging of return to owner fees for animals impounded for running at large. A small portion of the fee is typically returned to the City to recoup costs of providing animal regulation services for the community. The total cost is expected to be less than $200 for the City. This allows Haven to reduce the number of animals left in the shelter while it is being operated at minimum capacity, and it is a benefit for community members who are unable to make the payment at this time.

Suspend Late Fees and Interest on City Payments
The City has initiated the suspension of late fees and penalties for payments and all General Accounts Receivable for items like hangar rents and imposed fines. This is made possible through individual review of accounts as payments are submitted and the reporting is analyzed. Both systems are housed in the legacy system so adjustments are applied manually to individual accounts. The $35 returned check and returned ACH payment fees have been suspended as well. Returned check and ACH fees are charged on an individual basis, and returned items are reported from the City’s banking system daily. When applicable, the returned item amount with the additional fee are typically charged back to established accounts. The fee will be eliminated from these charge backs.

The current plan is to suspend penalties and interest for receivables due in March and April 2020, which would include payments due in April and May. Based on last year’s activities, it is estimated that the loss of revenue to the general fund from the suspensions will be $55,000. The suspension of the returned check and ACH fees is estimated to be $5,000 for the same time period. If extended an additional month through the end of the fiscal year (June 30, 2020), the savings to the community equates to an estimated $60,000 which will result in an equal amount of lost revenue for the City.

Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
4 Suspend Utility Shut-Off
Effective March 18, 2020, the City of Redding Utilities Customer Service suspended the practice of utility shut-offs due to non-payment. Each month, under normal circumstances, approximately 220 utility accounts are disconnected after failure to pay for utility service received over the previous 60 days. Typically, 75 percent of these customers pay their past due amount and have their utilities reconnected within two weeks. With the Covid-19 pandemic and the anticipated increase in the number of utility customers having difficulty keeping up with all of their monthly expenses, it was decided that loss of utility service should not contribute to the stress and anxiety already experienced. Once the pandemic has passed, the Customer Services division will work with customers using various tools to bring the accounts into good standing. It is known that this effort will result in a temporary increase in accounts receivable and decreased cash flow for all utilities – resulting in an equal amount of temporary financial relief to residents of the City of Redding. This measure may result in an increase in bad debt expense, however, additional proposed measures, listed later in this report, could assist in reducing bad debt expense.

Furthermore, bad debt would be sent to a collection agency with a recovery rate of approximately 30 percent.

Suspend Utility Late Fees
Like shut-offs, late fees for utility payments have been suspended. Late fees, historically, amount to $1.7 million per year. While late fee collections are not always linear, it is a close approximation that the suspension will save customers in excess of $425,000 due to the high potential that there will be an increase in late payments. Late fees are an administrative penalty, and therefore, are deposited in the General Fund. If it is assumed that there will be no attempt to collect the past-due late fees, the General Fund will miss revenue projections in this category by at least $425,000.

Distribution of $50 to REU Account Holders
The City Council approved the distribution of excess reserves to be credited to every Redding Electric Utility customer in December 2019 in the amount of $50 per account. The funding source for the distribution is the Greenhouse Gas Allowance Auction Proceeds (also referred to as GHG or Cap and Trade), in an amount equal to about $2.2 million, and will be accomplished via a bill credit.

Pending the City Council’s approval
The following programming ideas were developed to provide additional options to provide financial relief to residents and businesses. These plan elements vary in how they target a diverse set of community members. Reaching as much of the community as possible is crucial for Redding to solidify its economic foundation. These proposals require the City Council’s approval to proceed. Some of the following items can be implemented immediately, while others will need to be further developed and brought back to the Council for further direction.

Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
5 Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax
Defer payment of TOT from hotel and motel business until August 1, 2020 (payment due August 19, 2020). This deferral would be interest free and full payback would be made by November 1, 2020. The TOT deferral program could provide for much need cash flow for the Hotel and Motel industry by allowing an estimated $250,000 to remain with the business for operating expense. This program would be limited to Hotels/Motels with Business Licenses of 65-40-1 or 65-50-1.

Modify Existing CARES Program Guidelines
Community Assistance for Redding Electric Services (CARES) provides up to $300 of emergency assistance for the electric portion of bills for City of Redding utility customers. The intent of the CARES program is to help customers who have suffered a temporary financial hardship and to bring their account to a current status. Customers are eligible for CARES assistance once every 12 months. This program is funded out of the Public Benefits charges included in each ratepayers’ bill. Staff recommends applying a $300 CARES credit to all residential customers enrolled in the Residential Energy Discount Program (REU’s low income program). This would provide $1.2 million of immediate utility cost relief to our lowest-income customers with an additional $600,000 of additional relief available to those who may apply due to becoming eligible due to impacts from covid-19. These funds would be replenished with the new budget year beginning on July 1, 2020. Should the Council choose to do this, staff recommends providing the Electric Utility Director authority to repeat this process, should the Stay at Home order continue through the summer, and also suspend the once-per-year limitation for applicants. This would have no impact on the Electric Utility’s financial metrics as defined in Council Policy 1414, as Public Benefit Programs are restricted.

Modify Utilities Amortization Program Guidelines
The City of Redding Utilities Customer Service provides amortization for residential customer bills that are past due. This allows customers to “catch-up” on their bill for up to 12 months by amortizing the past-due balance. Staff recommends temporarily expanding this to commercial customers and temporarily extending the amortization for a period of up to 24 months, which would essentially provide a zero percent loan to customers that are past-due and having trouble paying their bill. In addition, this would allow commercial customers who receive Small Business Administration Loans to focus on other essential costs. This would have a temporary impact on City of Redding Utilities, as cash would not be received for up to two years. The risk to the utilities would be any eventual non-performance of these loans; non-performance would mean not paying the full amortization over the 24-month period. Therefore, staff recommends establishing an “eligibility criteria” that the customer must have not been disconnected for nonpayment of utilities in the previous year to be automatically approved for the amortization.

Customers not eligible for automatic amortization may still request it and approval will be granted on a case by case basis. Should the Council choose to do this, Staff recommends providing the Electric Utility Director administrative authority to modify program elements as necessary. As this could affect water, wastewater, and solid waste utilities, the Public Works Packet Pg. 173 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
6 Director would collaborate in these decisions. This plan element will potentially provide millions of dollars in available cash flow for residents and businesses.

Refund City of Redding Utilities Deposits
Staff recommends returning all customer deposits held by Utilities Customer Services. This would return approximately $3.4 million to customers, including approximately $600,000 to commercial customers. The City holds utility deposits on customer accounts that present a higher credit risk to the utilities. By returning deposits, the City is returning monies to customers most in need. This would have no immediate impact on the Electric Utility’s financial metrics as defined in Council Policy 1414 as customer deposits are not included in unrestricted reserves for the purpose of calculating days of cash on hand. The risk to the utilities would be future bad debt accruals of non-payment of utilities by customers who have demonstrated difficulty paying bills.

However, this bad debt would be sent to a collection agency with a recovery rate of approximately 30 percent. Should the Council choose to do this, Staff recommends providing the Electric Utility Director authority to modify administrative processes for billing future utility deposits as defined in City Council Policy 1404. The deposit requirement will be reinstated at an unknown time in the future.

Additional Cap and Trade Distribution
Staff recommends a $200 credit on Electric utility bills to all customers out of Cap and Trade auction proceeds, which is similar to the $50 refund recently approved by Council. This would provide an additional $9 million in rebates to electric utility customers, bringing the total rebate amount, including the Council’s action on March 26, 2020, to approximately $11 million. To fund this program, the Council would need to allocate the balance of current year Cap and Trade revenues and cancel two Council-approved programs that have yet to launch: Wildfire Mitigation and Building Electrification. Wildfire Mitigation has yet to start due to the California Air Resources Board not providing a quantification methodology for reduced greenhouse gasses achieved through fuels reduction, thus the Cap and Trade funds are not available for this purpose. Building Electrification has yet to start due to staffing limitations. This would have no impact on the Electric Utility’s financial metrics as defined in Council Policy 1414 as Cap and Trade revenues are restricted.

Utility Grant Program for Small Businesses
As an entitlement city for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) the City receives an annual allocation of Community Development Block Grant funding which is used for public service and public improvements. Due to the Federal CARES act the City received an additional allocation of $447,450. This funding, combined with unused funding from past projects, for a total of $600,000 provides the City an opportunity to provide funding toward eligible small business utility payments for those in the most need or are unable to receive Federal assistance or grants. If approved, staff will present the program and the amount available as part of the required public hearing to approve the use of the funding.

Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
7 Local Economic Stimulus Package
The Local Economic Stimulus Package is composed of multi-departmental projects intended to result in a combination of benefits to the City. In its infancy, this was a mass project designed to create an energy savings with each completed project. The City, however, has multiple deferred maintenance projects that must be completed to maintain the infrastructure stability of its assets.

Staff developed the following plan in a response to a need to merge the energy savings needs of the City with its deferred maintenance needs and infuse much needed capital into the local economy.

The projects in this package were specifically chosen as critical needs either in the realm of energy savings, which qualifies the project to be paid for through GHG auction proceeds, or for its contribution to eliminating the deferred maintenance needs of the City. A combination of GHG funding, utility reserves, municipal bond, and energy cost savings would be used to fund the package with little or no net budgetary impact to the General Fund. The total value of the economic stimulus package is estimated at approximately $20 million. Approximately $9.5 million of GHG money could be allocated for the completion of the projects that realize an energy savings for the City. The energy savings over time for the General Fund could be used to fund the deferred maintenance needs.

Several of the anticipated projects such as the work at various fire stations and lighting upgrades would be started immediately and put out to bid as soon as possible. Other projects, such as the replacement of the heating and air conditioning system at the Civic Auditorium will need to be analyzed further. The intent is to move quickly to infuse available GHG funds and provide economic benefit for the community.

The calculated energy savings from the energy savings projects could be used to secure bond funding to accelerate up to another $10 million in local projects including improvements to the Redding Aquatic Center, park facilities, required building maintenance, and other amenities.

Staff will return to the City Council with a full project list and borrowing options should the City Council provide direction to do so.

Completion of projects totaling up to $20 million is quite a large endeavor. However, the plan would be to bid multiple smaller projects to provide the best opportunity for local contractors to participate in the process, and thereby providing the local economy a direct opportunity to see quick and significant economic benefit in jobs and business activity. According to multipliers provided by the Shasta County Economic Development Corporation, the City of Redding would see a direct benefit equal to 328 jobs and $30 million of economic impact.

Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(c)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Approve the City of Redding (City) as applicant for a Service National Fish Passage Program Base Funding Grant, administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, requesting up to $2 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (2) Approve the City as applicant for a Water Supply for Environmental Flows (Stream Flow Enhancement Program) Grant, administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board requesting up to $5 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (3) Approve the City as applicant for a Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant, under Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act, administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, requesting up to $25 million with up to a 30 percent local match;
(4) Approve the City as applicant for a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund grant, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting up to $40 million with no local match;
(5) Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application to the State Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Fund for the project and authorizing the Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director to sign and file necessary applications and amendments thereto on behalf of the City of Redding; and (6) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the above grants, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant(s) be awarded.

Fiscal Impact
The total Pump House 1 Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $40 million.

Project costs in excess of grant funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 176
Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
with the grants will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The proposed grant programs do not require a local match, but applicants who offer some local match will typically be scored and ranked higher by the administering agencies and have a higher likelihood of receiving grant funding.

The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program and it has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and accumulated a balance of approximately $16.5 million.

City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under one or all of these grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.

PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component of the City’s water supply system.

PS01 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 29 million gallons-per-day. Staff plans to completely replace PS01 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its pumping capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District dam, which is downriver;
• The existing intake and screens may not meet long-term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species;
• Pumping capacity will need to be increased to meet the future demands of the FWTP; and • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during an earthquake.

On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized execution of a Consulting and Professional Services Contract (C-8541) with Jacobs to perform an evaluation of project alternatives and prepare a Preliminary Design Report for replacement of PS01. Based on recommendations in the Preliminary Design Report, the City has elected to proceed with a project alternative to replace and relocate PS01 at a new river trail location, approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing station.

Packet Pg. 177
Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
The new PS01 location is in a deeper area within the Sacramento River that will allow for better operations and reliability. The new location is also adjacent to Jenny Creek, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek in the area, a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will be required to perform, at some point. The creek restoration work will include removal of two existing culverts and restoration to an open channel. The culverts are currently preventing passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead into Jenny Creek. The restoration work will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the project.

On March 7, 2023, the Council authorized execution of an amendment to Jacobs’ contract for the second phase of professional consultant services associated with the project, including environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the selected project alternative. Under its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying these grant opportunities and will continue to assist the City with applications for the grants, if approved by the Council.

The National Fish Passage Program (NFPP) grant program provides direct technical and financial assistance to remove instream barriers and restore aquatic organism passage and aquatic connectivity for the benefit of Federal trust resources. It aims to maintain or increase fish populations to improve ecosystem resiliency, provide quality fishing experiences, support the modernization of infrastructure, and contribute to enhanced community resilience to the impacts from climate change and other public safety hazards. NFPP funds a variety of project types including, but not limited to, dam removals, culvert replacements, floodplain restoration, and the installation of fishways. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project makes it a good candidate to potentially receive grant funding from this program.

The Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) was created by statute in 1947 to conserve California’s wildlife resources and provide for public recreation. WCB awards grants for fish and wildlife habitat conservation, restoration, and for development of compatible public access facilities. Its Stream Flow Enhancement Grant Program also presents a funding opportunity for the project with the Jenny Creek restoration work included.

The Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant program aim is to support transformational habitat restoration projects that restore marine, estuarine, or coastal ecosystems, using approaches that enhance community and ecosystem resilience to climate hazards. It prioritizes funding for habitat restoration actions that demonstrate significant impacts, rebuild productive and sustainable fisheries, contribute to the recovery and conservation of threatened and endangered species, promote climate-resilient ecosystems, especially in tribal, indigenous, and/or underserved communities, and improve economic vitality. The project should be a good candidate for funding from this program because of the included Jenny Creek restoration work.

State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) provides drinking water State Revolving Fund (SRF) funds for a wide range of drinking water infrastructure projects, including projects for treatment, transmission, distribution, source, storage, consolidation, and creation of new systems.

City staff and Jacobs are confirming that the City will meet disadvantaged community requirements for loan forgiveness (grants) for this project. The City intends to apply for these grant funds to supplement design and construction costs associated with the Pump Station 1 Packet Pg. 178
Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
replacement. Prior to any SRF application submittal, an authorizing resolution is required. Staff has prepared the attached resolution for the Council’s consideration. The application resolution also provides SWRCB staff with the assurance the City is committed to the project. The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The design and technical studies will provide the information necessary to ensure environmental compliance as the project progresses.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 179
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING DESIGNATED CITY OFFICIALS TO FILE AN

APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A FINANCIAL

AGREEMENT FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL

BOARD TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND THOSE FUNDS IF THE

APPLICATION IS GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City of Redding (the “City) desires to apply for grant funding for its Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the City intends to finance the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project with monies (the “Project Funds”) provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (the “State Water Board”); and WHEREAS, the State Water Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the sale of obligations, the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the “Obligations”); and
WHEREAS, prior to either the issuance of Obligations or the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds, the City desires to incur certain capital expenditures (the “Expenditures”) with respect to the Project from available monies of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that those monies to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the City for the Expenditures from the proceeds of the Obligations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

1. The Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director (the “Authorized Representative”), or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of, the City of Redding, a Financial Assistance Application for the financing agreement from the State Water Board for the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project.

2. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to provide the assurances, certifications, and commitments required for the financial assistance application, including executing a financial assistance agreement from the State Water resources Control Board and any amendments or changes thereto.

Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

3. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to represent the City of Redding in carrying out the City’s responsibilities under the financing agreement, including certifying disbursement requests on behalf of the City of Redding and compliance with applicable state and federal laws.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of September, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
__________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 5094, to provide engineering services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Award to Jacobs;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Consultant and Professional Services Contract with Jacobs for Phase 1 (preliminary design) of the project, including project management, data review, geotechnical investigations, survey/mapping, preliminary environmental review, construction financing evaluation, and preparation of a preliminary design report for replacement of Pump House 1 for a not-to-exceed fee of $488,829; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $150,000.

Fiscal Impact
The total project costs are expected to be roughly $30 million. Funding for this project will come from the Water Utility Fund and the project is included in the current Capital Improvement Program. The City of Redding (City) plans to obtain State or Federal loans and/or grants, with the design consultant’s assistance, to fund a portion of the construction costs for the project.

Should funding from loans or grants not materialize, the City may need to issue municipal bonds.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the contract for Phase 1 preliminary design services for the project. This alternative will delay or eliminate the construction of the Pump House 1 Replacement Project subjecting the City’s water system to significant vulnerabilities and potential regulatory action.

MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 2 Background
The City’s water system includes two water treatment plants, approximately 555 miles of conveyance and distribution pipelines, 17 groundwater wells, 10 pump stations, and 12 reservoirs providing a total of 33.5 million gallons of storage. The City’s Pump House 1 (PH1) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately 1/4 mile upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP), its largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands. PH1 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, making it a very critical component of the City’s water supply chain.

PH1 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (MGD).

In 2002, a feasibility study entitled “Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project” (Feasibility Study) was prepared for the City by CH2M Hill (now Jacobs). Available funding was insufficient at that time to construct a new pumping facility or even to complete many of the recommended modifications. Therefore, the City was directed by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries to pursue an interim retrofit solution for fish screening, which was installed at PH1 in 2006. However, the retrofitted screens depart from standard criteria under certain river and operating conditions and as such are not a long term solution.

City staff plans to completely replace PH1 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) dam downriver. • The existing intake and screens may not meet long term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species.
• Its capacity will need to be increased to meet the future capacity of the FWTP. • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during a design earthquake.

City staff will consider four project alternatives, or combinations thereof, for replacement of Pump House 1, including:
• Replacement at the existing Pump House 1 location;
• Replacement at a new river trail location, approximately 2,000 feet upriver; • Replacement at the Keswick Reservoir; and
• Replacement with a riverbank filtration collector well system.

Design services for the PH1 replacement will be broken into two phases. Phase 1 of the design is included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will include preliminary design services for evaluation of the project alternatives, and preparation of a preliminary design report to allow the City to determine the appropriate project alternative to pursue.

Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 3 Phase 2 of the design is not included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, preparation of contract documents, and design services during the bid and construction periods for the selected project alternative. If the City is satisfied with Jacobs’ services at the completion of Phase 1 (expected spring of 2021), then staff intends to recommend at that time that the Council authorize negotiation for an amendment with Jacobs to add Phase 2 design services to the Contract.

Otherwise, a separate RFP will be required for Phase 2 engineering services.

CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
A review and selection panel was formed with five members from the Public Works Water and Engineering Divisions. The panel’s evaluation was based on consultants’ ability and qualifications to perform all phases of the engineering services that will be required, including both Phases 1 and 2.

Four proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received on January 24, 2020.

The panel members evaluated and scored each proposal based on consultants’ understanding of the project/scope, project approach, experience with fish screens, experience with riverbank filtration collector wells, qualifications of the project team and manager, familiarity with City projects and required procedures, ability to complete projects on-time and within budget, and the proposed teams’ location. After reviewing the proposals, the panel elected to interview all four of the firms that proposed.

Oral interviews were held on March 12, 2020, at City Hall. Each consultant team was allowed 55 minutes to provide a presentation and answer the City’s questions. The questions asked were the same for all consultant teams and were not provided to any team until they arrived for the interview; at which time, each participant was provided the questions in writing. Review Panel members evaluated and scored each consultant team based on their presentation and responses to the questions.

After the oral interviews, the review panel:
• Combined scores from the consultants’ proposals and oral interview to determine their overall score;
• Ranked consultants based on their overall score; and
• After ranking, opened consultant’s sealed fee envelopes.

The panel ranked the firms as follows:

Rank Firm Fee
1 Jacobs $488,829
2 Black & Veatch $576,210
3 West Yost $997,956
4 Stantech $1,160,516
Applying the evaluation criteria to the proposals and oral interview scoring, it is the opinion of the selection panel that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required services. This opinion is in part based on Jacobs’:
• Excellent fish screen and riverbank collector well design experience and qualifications; • Environmental and compliance team has a proven track record with similar projects; Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 4 • Design experience in the Sacramento River near the project area; • Creative design approach and ideas presented in their oral interview; and • Local team.

Replacement of Pump House 1 has been included in the City’s Water Master Plan for several years and is a necessary and critical improvement for the City’s water supply chain. Staff believes that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required design services and recommends that the Council authorize recommendations listed herein, including award to Jacobs’ for an amount not-to-exceed $488,829.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Agreement (available online)
Location Map
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 1 Rev. 02/17

CITY OF REDDING

CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (“Consultant”) for the purpose of City of Redding Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1-Preliminary Design).

WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:

SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.

SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred TwentyNine Dollars ($488,829). This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be itemized to reflect the employees performing the requested tasks, the billing rate for each employee and the hours worked.

C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.

D. Pursuant to Section 1781 of the Labor Code, Consultant is advised that the work contemplated in Exhibit A, Task 2.2 and 2.3 of this contract is subject to the payment of prevailing wages and all other requirements of the Prevailing Wage Law. The prevailing wage of each job classification may be found by inquiry with the California Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall comply with all laws related to the performance of public work including, but not limited to, the Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 2 Rev. 02/17
employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Section 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.

E. No Consultant or subconsultant may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. No Consultant or subconsultant may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. All Consultants and subconsultants must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. This requirement applies to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing. Consultant is further advised that the work contemplated herein is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about May 11, 2020, and complete said work no later than December 31, 2021. Time is of the essence.

B. If Consultant fails to perform its duties to the satisfaction of City, or if consultant fails to fulfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Contract, then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon City giving written notice thereof to Consultant.

C. Either Party may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the term set forth in Section 3.A. of this Contract exceeds ninety (90) calendar days in duration, Consultant’s sole right to terminate shall be limited to termination for cause.

D. Consultant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City’s funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the project and/or work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of its intention to terminate. In the event of a termination pursuant to this subdivision, Consultant shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.

Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 3 Rev. 02/17
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.

F. In the event that City terminates the Contract, City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Contract; provided, however, that City shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits which might have been made by Consultant had Consultant completed the services required by this Contract. Consultant shall, not later than ten (10) calendar days after termination of this Contract by City, furnish to City such financial information as in the judgment of the City’s representative is necessary to determine the reasonable value of the services rendered by Consultant.

G. In no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party’s failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.

SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT A. City shall make its facilities accessible to Consultant as required for Consultant’s performance of its services under this Contract, and, upon request of Consultant, provide labor and safety equipment as required by Consultant for such access.

B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.

C. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Contract any licenses, permits and approvals that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.

D. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Contract, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Contract is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/employee relationship, association, joint venture relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs under this Contract. Any and all taxes imposed on Consultant’s income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Contract or its performance, including but not limited to sales or use taxes, shall be paid by Consultant. Consultant shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Consultant is an employee of City. Consultant shall not Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 4 Rev. 02/17
be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.

E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.

F. No portion of the work or services to be performed under this Contract shall be assigned, transferred, conveyed or subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant may use the services of independent contractors and subcontractors to perform a portion of its obligations under this Contract with the prior written approval of City. Independent contractors and subcontractors shall be provided with a copy of this Contract and Consultant shall have an affirmative duty to assure that said independent contractors and subcontractors comply with the same and agree to be bound by its terms. Consultant shall be the responsible party with respect to all actions of its independent contractors and subcontractors, and shall obtain such insurance and indemnity provisions from its contractors and subcontractors as City’s Risk Manager shall determine to be necessary.

G. Consultant, at such times and in such form as City may require, shall furnish City with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Contract, the costs or obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Contract.

H. Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by City to assure proper accounting for all project funds. These records shall be made available for audit purposes to state and federal authorities, or any authorized representative of City.

Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.

I. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Contract in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of Consultant’s profession. All products of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Contract shall be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing the profession of Consultant and its agents, employees and subcontractors assigned to perform the services contemplated by this Contract.

J. All completed reports and other data or documents, or computer media including diskettes, and other materials provided or prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Contract are the property of City, and may be used by City. City shall have all intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, copyright and patent rights, in said documents, computer media, and other materials provided by Consultant. City shall release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, costs, Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 5 Rev. 02/17
expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.

K. Consultant, including its employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Contract. Consultant shall comply with all requirements of the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 8100 et seq.) and other laws relating to conflicts of interest, including the following: 1) Consultant shall not make or participate in a decision made by City if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision may have a material effect on Consultant’s economic interest, and 2) if required by the City Attorney, Consultant shall file financial disclosure forms with the City Clerk.

SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:

Coverage Required Not Required
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability X
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) X
(Place an “x” in the appropriate box)
B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office form number CG-0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;

2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;

3. Statutory Workers’ Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers’ Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 6 Rev. 02/17

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.

5. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording “but only in the event of a named insured’s sole negligence” or any other verbiage limiting the insured’s insurance responsibility.

C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant; premises owned, leased or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant.

The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

2. The insurance coverage of Consultant shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Consultant shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Consultant agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice has been given to City.

E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.

F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 7 Rev. 02/17
insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.

G. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant as required by Section 5 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Consultant pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.

H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a “claims made” policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945.6, Consultant shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination of this Contract.

I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall immediately notify City’s Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225-4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Consultant shall submit a written report to City’s Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Consultant’s insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.

SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2782.8, when the services to be provided under this Contract are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under Section 2782.8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 8 Rev. 02/17
B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

C. The Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s inability to evaluate liability. The Consultant shall respond within thirty (30) calendar days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City.

If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered to City within thirty (30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Consultant herein.

D. The obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.

E. City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Consultant pursuant to this Section to represent City’s interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.

SECTION 7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES A. This Contract shall be deemed to have been entered into in Redding, California. All questions regarding the validity, interpretation or performance of any of its terms or of any rights or obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be governed by California law. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 9 Rev. 02/17
parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.

C. No covenant or condition to be performed by Consultant under this Contract can be waived except by the written consent of City. Forbearance or indulgence by City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of the covenant or condition in question. Until performance by Consultant of said covenant or condition is complete, City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to City under this Contract or by law or in equity despite said forbearance or indulgence.

D. If any portion of this Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.

E. The headings in this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof. A waiver of any party of any provision or a breach of this Contract must be provided in writing, and shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provisions herein.

F. Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Contract, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares and represents that this Contract is made without reliance upon any statement or representation not contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Contract and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Contract is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code § 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.

G. Each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.

H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 10 Rev. 02/17
and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.

SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.

SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.

B. In the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.

SECTION 10. REPRESENTATIVES
A. City’s representative for this Contract is Kurt Maire, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 225-4081, fax number (530) 245-7024. All of Consultant’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person, or to the representative's designee.

B. Consultant’s representative for this Contract is Kim Hein, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 355-8488. All of City’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person.

C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.

SECTION 11. NOTICES
A. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be deemed given only if in writing signed by an authorized representative of the sender (may be other than the representatives referred to in Section 10) and delivered by facsimile, Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 11 Rev. 02/17
with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:

To City:

City of Redding – Engineering
Mr. Kurt Maire, P.E.
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Mrs. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
B. Either party may change its address for the purposes of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.

C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.

SECTION 12. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT
A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective parties to this Contract; that they have full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Contract; and that the execution, performance and delivery of this Contract by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Contract.

B. When the Mayor is signatory to this Contract, the City Manager and/or the Department Director having direct responsibility for managing the services provided herein shall have authority to execute any amendment to this Contract which does not increase the amount of compensation allowable to Consultant or otherwise substantially change the scope of the services provided herein.

SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.

Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) 2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
United States
T +1.530.243.5831
F +1.530.243.1654
www.jacobs.com
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

PPS0402201345RDD 1
Exhibit A
April 14, 2020
Attention: Josh Watkins, Water Manager
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1 – Preliminary Design)
Dear Mr. Watkins:

This letter presents Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.’s (JACOBS) proposed Scope of Engineering Services (Exhibit A) for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project - Phase 1 Preliminary Design (Project). We are proposing to perform the work under the City of Redding Consulting and Professional Services Agreement on a not-toexceed time and materials basis per the rate schedule (Exhibit B).

Per Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 5094, the effort associated with this Project will require two separate phases.

Phase 1 will involve preliminary design (alternatives evaluation) services and preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) with recommendations. Phase 2 will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, and preparation of contract documents, as well as design services during the bid and construction periods for replacement of Pump House 1 (PS1)and installation of a new raw water pipeline, as required. The City will issue a contract for Phase 1. If the City is satisfied with the PDR and the JACOBS services to that point, the City intends to provide JACOBS a contract amendment to work on Phase 2.

Project Introduction
The City of Redding (City) PS1 supplies approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (mgd) of Sacramento River water to the Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP) through two 30-inch-diameter pipelines. It is the primary delivery source and a critical component for the FWTP. PS1 is currently located on the right bank (looking downstream) of the Sacramento River along the Sacramento River Trail approximately 0.25 miles upstream of the Diestelhorst Bridge.

PS1 is scheduled for replacement based primarily on the following:
▪ Current location is within significant habitat for endangered winter-run salmon and the current screening is not optimal for species protection and does not meet state and federal fishery criteria. ▪ Limited intake capacity during low river stages due to shallow river depth during times when the AndersonCottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) diversion dam flashboards are not in place. This situation makes the City dependent on ACID operations at the diversion dam, which typically has flashboards installed only from April to November.

Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 2
▪ The City’s General Plan identified PS1 as being located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and recommended that the structure be evaluated for its ability to withstand damage during a design earthquake.
▪ Proposed FWTP expansion up to a capacity of 42 mgd per the City’s Water Master Plan. ▪ Limited workspace for maintenance around the pumping units and other equipment.

The objective of Phase 1 Preliminary Design is to provide review of alternatives, sufficient engineering, major design elements, economic information, and screening the alternatives so the City can decide how to proceed with implementation of the Project. Alternatives, including combinations thereof, will be selected in a collaborative process with the City to be evaluated during Phase 1 and include the following:
▪ Alternative 1 – Existing Pump Station 1 Location
▪ Alternative 2 – New River Trail Location
▪ Alternative 4 – Keswick Reservoir Location
▪ Alternative 5 – Riverbank Filtration Collector Well System Scope of Engineering Services
The scope of engineering services to provide for the Project definition phase are outlined by tasks below:

Task 1 – Project Management, Meetings, and Quality Control Subtask 1.1 – Project Management
The purpose of this subtask is to provide for the initiation and overall management of Project activities. An overall schedule and work plan will be developed and implemented so that work activities are completed in an integrated and timely manner. In addition, this task includes those elements necessary to manage, lead, and control the Project.

JACOBS will furnish project management services for the Project, as follows:
▪ Status Reporting – Monitor budget, progress, and schedule. Monitor work efforts and evaluate actual versus planned progress. Changes in scope will be communicated to the City. Provide verbal progress reports to the City’s project manager as necessary.
▪ Administration – Maintain Project records, manage and process Project communications, and coordinate Project administrative matters. Prepare monthly invoices and Project status reports. ▪ Coordination – Coordinate tasks/subtasks and staff, including coordination with the City, to complete authorized work on schedule and within budget.

JACOBS will manage the health, safety, and environmental activities of its staff. JACOBS will prepare a projectspecific Health and Safety Plan. JACOBS will address safety in the office and during site visits. JACOBS is not responsible for the health and safety of other project participants.

Deliverables: Monthly invoices with status reports.

Subtask 1.2 – Meetings
The purpose of this subtask is to provide coordination of Project activities.

Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 3
JACOBS will conduct meetings for the Project as follows:
▪ Kickoff meeting with City of Redding at City Hall to reinforce key project objectives, critical milestones, budget, critical success factors, and team roles and responsibilities (assume 4 hours with Project Manager, Design Manager, and four key design team members).
▪ Up to 12 monthly status conference calls or meetings at City Hall between City and JACOBS. JACOBS will prepare monthly agendas and summary minutes, including ongoing work, issues pending, action items, and status of open action items.
▪ One (1) Alternatives Analysis Workshop with the City (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting Leads).
▪ One (1) Preliminary Design Workshop with City and state/federal agencies (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting leads).

Deliverables: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.

Subtask 1.3 – Quality Control
The purpose of this subtask is to provide quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) for the Project. Upon completion of the Draft and Pre-Final PDR phases, senior members of the JACOBS team will review design and construction methodology, drawings, calculations, Project design report, and the overall integrity of the design.

Internal reviews by senior engineers using quality review forms (QRFs) will be performed on Draft and Pre-Final PDR deliverables.

Comments received from the quality control reviewers will be reviewed and adjudicated by the design team, with changes and additions incorporated into the design documents prior to delivery to the City.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Task 2 – Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Subtask 2.1 Data Review
JACOBS will review available data, reports, mapping, and geotechnical reports. The following information may include, but not limited to:
▪ CH2M HILL (now JACOBS) prepared the Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project in February 2002.
▪ Record Documents: JACOBS will review available record documents, including record drawings, technical specifications, design reports, and geotechnical data reports. ▪ Federal, State, and Local Requirements: JACOBS will determine, with assistance from the City, regulatory requirements applicable for the Project. JACOBS will research and document restrictions as they pertain to the proposed Project alternatives.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 4
Subtask 2.2 Geotechnical Investigations
JACOBS will perform geotechnical and geophysical investigations necessary to provide sufficient data for Phase 1.

Geophysical refraction surveys will be performed to provide profiles with well-contrasted changes in seismic velocity that facilitates interpretation of subsurface stratigraphy. The seismic velocity of the rock will evaluate the feasibility of excavation, or excavatability, of the rock and feasibility of driving sheet piles for scour protection and cofferdam construction.

One geophysical refraction survey line is proposed for each Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 (two lines total), but no survey lines will be provided for either Alternative 4 or Alternative 5. The survey reveals subsurface strata to the anticipated excavation depth. Following the completion of the geophysical survey, up to two soil borings will be drilled adjacent to the river trail at the location of the proposed pump station.

The potential for liquefaction will be evaluated from the borehole data, as liquefaction mitigation would significantly contribute to the cost of the alternative. Samples are tested in the laboratory to evaluate their consistency and properties.

Up to two soil borings total will first be drilled at two potential collector well sites. The sites are identified as Area 4 in the 1972 report to the City by Ranney, and an area on the south side of the river near the ACID Fish Screen.

If the soil borings find adequate sands and gravels are present for a potential collector well and the City approves the pumping well site, up to one 12-inch-diameter pumping well will be completed.

Three observation wells would be installed at approximate radial distances between 30 to 150 feet from the pumping/test well at a location approved by the City. These wells would be used to monitor how the water table responds to pumping from the test well. Following development of all the wells, the test well would be pumped for a minimum of 24 hours while observing the response in the monitoring wells. The results of the pumping test will be used to estimate the hydraulic capacity of the proposed collector well site.

Assumptions: The soil boring drilling and geophysical surveys are performed during the course of one working day at each location. The well installation development and testing would be completed during approximately 2 weeks at each location. It is assumed that site access is provided for the geophysical crew and drill rigs. It is assumed that no permits will be needed to perform the geophysical survey. Well permits will be obtained through Shasta County. The geophysical survey and drilling crews will work under the supervision of JACOBS.

Assume that City encroachment permits will be required for borings and City will waive the encroachment permit fees.

Deliverables: A geotechnical data report will be prepared to summarize the field investigation and testing results.

The geologic hazards associated with each alternative will be discussed and a determination will be made of the potential for a future collector well at up to two sites. A geotechnical data report will be incorporated in the PDR.

Subtask 2.3 Surveying and Mapping
Ground surface surveys, both on bank and on the river bottom, will be performed as necessary to complete the preliminary design for Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. Two cross-sections perpendicular to the river will be surveyed at both the Alternatives 1 and 2 sites to determine preliminary facility elevations. Assumes two people Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 5
for one day in the field for this task. No surveying and mapping are included herein for Alternatives 4 and 5 because this information is not required for Phase 1 evaluations.

JACOBS will perform a preliminary right-of-way assessment and identify potential right-of-way issues based on readily available GIS data. Right-of-way surveys will be performed in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Task 3 – Preliminary Environmental Review
The purpose of this task is to evaluate the environmental viability and issues related to each proposed alternative. JACOBS will perform a screening-level review of the biological and cultural impact potential for each site based upon readily available data and technical experience in the Project area. This includes for each site:
▪ One-day reconnaissance level site visit with California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and Biogeographic Information and Observation System Database (BIOS) data reviews for any potential endangered or listed species within each Project.
▪ Identification of the likely Area of Potential Effect (APE) and initial review by a JACOBS archaeologist and cultural resources specialist. California Historical Resource Information System (CHRIS) surveys will likely only be completed for the selected alternative in Phase 2. ▪ Review of water rights and evaluation for change in point-of-diversion. ▪ Preliminary delineation of the Ordinary High-Water Mark (OWHM) is performed for an engineering alternatives review. Detailed wetland delineation and permitting is completed in Phase 2 once the Project is defined.
▪ Coordination with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine the preliminary feasibility of each selected alternative.
▪ Gather information related to existing river bank collector well systems adjacent to anadromous waterways in northern California and analyze their permitting and regulatory challenges.

Assumptions:
▪ Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) document will not be completed in Phase

1. LEDPA analysis will be included in Phase 2 if individual permit cannot be avoided from USACE. ▪ California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance is considered for each alternative with assumptions. CEQA and NEPA documents are included in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 4 – Construction Funding Evaluation
The purpose of this task is to provide a list of viable funding alternatives like California State Revolving Fund (SRF) and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) for the project construction and rank them based on likelihood of successful application, associated interest rates, terms, design or construction related requirements, potential impacts to the project schedule, related reporting or monitoring requirements, and other important aspects associated with each funding alternative.

Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 6
Assumptions:
▪ Up to four funding mechanisms are reviewed and ranked in the PDR. ▪ Applications for funding submission are not included in Phase 1.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report
The purpose of this task is to provide the City of Redding with a PDR with the preferred alternative for the City to consider for Phase 2 Final Design.

JACOBS will follow a three-phase process for delivery of the preliminary design for the Project. This process includes producing preliminary deliverables at three phases of the design (Draft, Pre-Final, and Final Preliminary Design). At the Draft and Pre-Final phases, JACOBS will provide information for review and provide for resolution of key issues before proceeding to the next phase. The information collected, and the concepts defined in each consecutive phase, will form the basis for subsequent work.

Each phase will include specific deliverables, which are identified in the following subtasks. Design review workshops (at City Hall) with the City of Redding will be conducted at critical design milestones as identified in the following subtasks. The City of Redding will provide comments to JACOBS within 3 weeks of receiving the documents.

Project Design Criteria
The Project design criteria will be developed for evaluating the alternatives and will be included in the PDRs.

Engineering design criteria will address resource agency criteria, structural, civil, geotechnical, mechanical, electrical, conveyance pipeline, cost and financial analysis, and construction elements. Operations criteria will encompass diversion requirements and other operations to maintain water deliveries during construction.

Development and Evaluation of Alternatives and Components Alternatives will be developed in concert with the City. JACOBS anticipates up to four alternatives will be evaluated per the project design criteria. JACOBS will prepare information associated with each alternative to provide information for a project workshop with the City and agencies to ensure consensus of alternatives.

JACOBS will evaluate design criteria and prepare conceptual design documents for the alternatives and components. Conceptual design documents will include approximately three drawings per alternative: site plan, facility layout plan, cross sections, river and screen criteria, construction phasing approach, operations and maintenance (O&M), construction cost estimates, and life-cycle cost will be included in the PDRs.

JACOBS will provide a clearly defined ranking system and rank the four alternatives based on performance, capital and operating costs, environmental impacts, and other factors that should be considered.

Subtask 5.1 – Draft Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report to document the information prepared to select the preferred design alterative for the Project.

Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 7
The Draft PDR will include cost estimates for the remaining phases of the Project, including environmental and permitting, easement acquisition (City to provide land value assumptions), final engineering and design, services during construction (engineering support and construction management), construction, and O&M.

Construction cost estimates will be prepared to the level of accuracy based on the information available within normal industry standards. Estimates will be formatted in accordance with the Project design CSI specification format and segregated by facility. Where sufficient detailed information is lacking to obtain reasonably accurate prices of materials a contingency allowance may be applied. Escalation allowances will be used to provide an opinion of the estimated construction costs at the midpoint of construction.

This report is expected to be a working document at this stage of design.

JACOBS will facilitate a Preliminary Design Workshop with the City and agencies to review the preliminary design and receive input from the City and agencies.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Draft PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Subtask 5.2 – Pre-Final Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Pre-Final PDR for the Project. PDR review comments from the City and federal and state agencies will be incorporated. The Pre-Final submittal will include the concept drawings and preliminary construction costs. The PDR will include an estimate for annual operating costs, estimated service life for major components and equipment, and provide a life-cycle cost analysis for each alternative.

The Pre-Final PDR review submittal will recommend a project alternative and is intended to be essentially ready for City of Redding preferred alternative selection. The PDR will document the major design criteria used for the various project components.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Pre-Final PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Subtask 5.3 – Final Preliminary Design Report
This is the final phase of the PDR. Review comments from the Pre-Final PDR from the City of Redding review will be incorporated. JACOBS will prepare the Final PDR, which will be stamped by California Registered Professional Engineers. The Final PDR will include design criteria, to be used as the preliminary basis of design for Phase 2, for the City’s preferred alternative.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of P.E. stamped PDR documents.

Schedule
The Scope of Engineering Services and activities is anticipated to commence in May 2020 and will be completed no later than March 2021 assuming COVID-19 does not affect field work schedules. The Scope of Engineering Services and activities associated with this Project will be completed in accordance with the following approximate milestones:
▪ Project Authorized and Notice to Proceed by City of Redding– Mid-May 2020 ▪ Complete Draft Preliminary Design – September 2020
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 8
▪ Complete Pre-Final Preliminary Design – December 2020 ▪ Complete Final Preliminary Design – March 2021
The Scope of Engineering Services shall be considered complete when final deliverables are deemed acceptable by the City. Efforts will be made by the JACOBS to complete the work in a timely manner. However, it is agreed that the JACOBS cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond JACOBS control, or factors which would not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this Scope of Engineering Services was executed.

Budget
The budgetary amount for professional services and expenses are provided in Exhibit B. JACOBS will make reasonable efforts to complete the work within the budget. JACOBS is not obligated to incur costs beyond the indicated budget, as may be adjusted, and the City of Redding is not obligated to pay JACOBS beyond these limits.

The rates as shown in Exhibit B will be escalated for year 2021, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

In the event that a task or subtask is complete and the task or subtask budget is not fully spent, upon City approval, remaining funds may be transferred to other tasks which might require additional budget, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

Additional Services Not Included
The services described below are not included in this Scope of Engineering Services but can be performed if requested and approved by City and JACOBS. Time, scope, and fee have not been budgeted for the tasks listed hereunder. Authorization to proceed shall be in the form of an amendment to this Scope of Engineering Services specifying the work to be performed and the additional payment for such services rendered. ▪ Additional workshops not listed above
▪ Environmental permitting support exceeding those listed above ▪ Survey and mapping exceeding those listed above
▪ Final engineering and design services
▪ Construction management services
▪ Materials testing or special inspection services
▪ Additional items noted to be excluded within the Scope of Engineering Services If you have any questions or require further information do not hesitate to contact Kimberly Hein at 530.355.8488.

Sincerely,
Lisa Alliger, P.E. Kimberly Hein, P.E.

Manager of Projects Project Manager
cc: Kurt Maire, City of Redding Public Works Engineer
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Exhibit B
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding
Consultant Fee
Phase 1 Fee Summary
Task
No. Description Labor Fee
Subcontractor
Fee Expenses Fee
Task 1 Project Management
Task 1.1 Project Management $23,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,376.00 Task 1.2 Meetings $21,148.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $22,148.00 Task 1.3 Quality Control $17,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,664.00 Task 1 Subtotal $62,188.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $63,188.00
Task 2 Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Task 2.1 Data Review $14,892.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,892.00
Task 2.2 Geotechnical
Investigations
$41,016.00 $19,541.00 $2,000.00 $62,647.00
Task 2.2 Drilling/Pump Testing $0.00 $135,524.00 $0.00 $135,524.00 Task 2.3 Surveying and Mapping $4,080.00 $7,455.00 $800.00 $12,335.00 Task 2 Subtotal $59,988.00 $162,520.00 $2,800.00 $225,308.00 Task 3 Preliminary Environmental
Review
$44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 3 Subtotal $44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 4 Construction Funding
Evaluation
$19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 4 Subtotal $19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 5 Preliminary Design Report
(Preliminary, Pre-Final, and
Final PDR)
$136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
Task 5 Subtotal $136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $488,829.00
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PPS0402201345RDD 2
Consultant Rates
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding 2020 Hourly Billing Rates
Labor Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate
Office/Clerical/Accounting $108
Junior-Level Technician $80
Mid-level Technician $123
Senior-Level Technician $179
Staff Engineer 1 $122
Staff Engineer 2 $133
Associate Engineer $135
Project Engineer $187
Engineer Specialist/Associate Project Manager $204
Senior Technologist/Project Manager $255
Principal Technologist/Senior Project Manager $283
Includes engineering, consulting planner, and scientist disciplines.

Notes:
1) A markup of 5 percent will be applied to all Other Direct Costs and Expenses. 2) Direct expenses are those necessary costs and charges incurred for the PROJECT including, but not limited to:
a) The direct costs of transportation, meals and lodging, mail, subcontracts, outside services, and equipment and supplies.
b) Consultant’s current standard rate charges for direct use of Consultant’s vehicles, laboratory test and analysis, printing and reproduction services, and certain field equipment; and c) Consultant’s standard project charges for special health and safety requirements of Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3) Consultant’s current standard rates for direct expenses shall be used. These rates are subject to change following internal audits and reviews.
4) These rates are effective January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Rate schedule is subject to annual revision to reflect current rates and not to exceed 4 percent per year for subsequent years of the contract.

Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following actions regarding allocation of an awarded federal grant from the U.S. Department of Transportation Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Program and regional non-motorized grant funds for the following project:
(1) Accept the funds in the amount of $240,000 for the Local Road Safety Plan Update; and (2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 13
th Amendment to City Budget
Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $240,000 for the project.

Fiscal Impact
The total estimated cost of the Safe Streets and Roads For All (SS4A) Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP) update is $300,000. The attached budget Resolution will appropriate federal SS4A funds in the amount of $240,000. The remaining $60,000 will come from in-lieu work from staff, Citywide Transportation Impact Fee (TIF), streets funds, or other potential local funding sources.

SS4A requires a minimum 20 percent match from local sources in order to fund the grants. This planning process is required in order to apply for project construction funding for future SS4A cycles. This federal funding source is substantial and could fund multiple road projects over the next few years, after the LRSP is updated to meet the SS4A goals.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the SS4A funds or approve the budget Resolution. The City of Redding (City) would lose the SS4A funds in the amount of $240,000 and the projects may not be completed without additional funding sources and the City would be ineligible for future cycles of the SS4A program.

MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Accept Safe Streets and Roads for All Planning Funds to Update the Local Road Safety Program and Adopt Budget Resolution Appropriating Funds Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 210
Report to Redding City Council September 12, 2023
Re: 4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds Page 2 Background/Analysis
On February 15, 2022, the Council adopted an LRSP. The LRSP needs to be amended to address new program goals, and add newly identified projects including public outreach and preliminary engineering.

Federal funding is available through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law for planning and implementing SS4A projects in an effort to implement Vision Zero; a strategy to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe and healthy mobility for all user of the transportation system. Staff applied for and was awarded SS4A program funds in the amount of $240,000 to update the LRSP and complete the necessary outreach and preliminary engineering.

These funds require appropriation with the attached budget resolution to allow for expenditures.

Many of the elements and small projects included in the current plan have been implemented.

The City desires to amend the LSRP to address larger road improvement projects, incorporate more aggressive safety strategies and goals, and take a more regional approach including incorporation of projects that include state facilities. The City also seeks to include more innovative technologies or strategies that promote safety as well as equity within the project identification, scoping and outreach process. The completed LRSP will incorporate SS4A goals that lay out the Vision Zero plan for the City of Redding and, with the cooperation of the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA/MPO) and other local partners, address priorities within the region. The completed plan will address equity challenges to ensure projects are developed considering the overall impacts on all users of the system and our community.

Environmental Review
These actions are not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required at this time. Appropriating funding for the LRSP update will allow the planning effort to move forward. Projects identified in the updated LRSP may be subject to future environmental analysis.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
Attachments
^Resolution
Draft Agreement
021522 LRSP Staff Report
Packet Pg. 211
RESOLUTION NO. 2023-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 13 TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060
APPROPRIATING THE SAFE STREETS AND ROAD FOR ALL GRANT OF $240,000 FOR THE LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
151 1671 Transportation Grant Projects $240,000
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
151-1671-36010001-00000
Federal Grant Operating -
Public Works $ 240,000
Increase Expenditures
151-1671-6190901-00000
Federal Operating Grant
Activities - Other $ 240,000
Total $ 240,000 $ 240,000
THAT the purpose is to appropriate the Safe Streets and Roads for All grant of $240,000 for the Local Road Safety Plan for fiscal year 2023-2024.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of September, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 1 of 12

1. Award No.
693JJ32340365

2. Effective Date
See No. 17 Below

3. Assistance
Listings No.

20.939

4. Award To
City of Redding
777 Cypress Ave.

Redding, CA 96001
Unique Entity Id.: GRWNHECLZHF1
TIN No.: 946000401

5. Sponsoring Office
U.S. Department of Transportation
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Safety
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE
HSSA-1, Mail Drop E71-117
Washington, DC 20590

6. Period of Performance
Effective Date of Award through 12 months

7. Total Amount
Federal Share:

Recipient Share:

Other Federal Funds:

Other Funds:

Total:
$240,000
$60,000
$0
$0
$300,000

8. Type of Agreement
Grant

9. Authority
Section 24112 of the Infrastructure Investment
and Jobs Act (Pub. L. 117–58, November 15,
2021; also referred to as the “Bipartisan
Infrastructure Law” or “BIL”)

10. Procurement Request No.

HSSP230250PR

11. Federal Funds Obligated
$240,000

12. Submit Payment Requests To
See article 20.

13. Payment Office
See article 20.

14. Accounting and Appropriations Data
15X0173E50.0000.055SR10500.5592000000.25305.61006600

15. Description of Project
The City of Redding has developed a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), that needs to be amended to complete elements of the Action Plan. The LRSP engaged with a variety of public and private stakeholders to develop plans and projects but to complete the Action Plan the City would expand the scope of the plan, address additional projects and then re-engage and address the community to include the public.

RECIPIENT

16. Signature of Person Authorized to Sign
___________________________________
Signature Date
Name: Barry Tippin
Title: City Manager

FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION

17. Signature of Agreement Officer
______________________________________
Signature Date
Name: Carolyn Lethert
Title: Agreement Officer
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Draft Agreement (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 2 of 12
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

GRANT AGREEMENT UNDER THE
FISCAL YEAR 2022 SAFE STREETS AND ROADS FOR ALL GRANT PROGRAM This agreement is between the Federal Highway Administration (the “FHWA”) and the City of Redding (the “Recipient”).

This agreement reflects the selection of the Recipient to receive a Safe Streets and Roads for All (“SS4A”) Grant for the City of Redding Safe Streets Planning.

The parties therefore agree to the following:

ARTICLE 1

GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS

1.1 General Terms and Conditions.
(a) In this agreement, “General Terms and Conditions” means the content of the document titled “General Terms and Conditions Under the Fiscal Year 2022 Safe Streets and Roads for All Grant Program,” dated February 8, 2023, which is available at https://www.transportation.gov/grants/ss4a/grant-agreements. Articles 7–30 are in the General Terms and Conditions. The General Terms and Conditions are part of this agreement.
(b) The Recipient states that it has knowledge of the General Terms and Conditions.

Recipient also states that it is required to comply with all applicable Federal laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (2 CFR part 200); National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.); and Build America, Buy America Act (BIL, div. G §§ 70901-27).
(c) The Recipient acknowledges that the General Terms and Conditions impose obligations on the Recipient and that the Recipient’s non-compliance with the General Terms and Conditions may result in remedial action, termination of the SS4A Grant, disallowing costs incurred for the Project, requiring the Recipient to refund to the FHWA the SS4A Grant, and reporting the non-compliance in the Federal-government-wide integrity and performance system.

Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Draft Agreement (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 3 of 12
ARTICLE 2

APPLICATION, PROJECT, AND AWARD

2.1 Application.

Application Title: City of Redding Safe Streets Planning Application Date: 06/01/2023

2.2 Award Amount.

SS4A Grant Amount: $240,000

2.3 Award Dates.

Period of Performance End Date: See Section 6 on page 1

2.4 Budget Period.

Budget Period End Date: See Section 6 on page 1

2.5 Action Plan Grant or Implementation Grant Designation.

Designation: Action Plan

2.6 Federal Award Identification Number.

The Federal Award Identification Number is listed on page 1, line 1.

ARTICLE 3

SUMMARY PROJECT INFORMATION

3.1 Summary of Project’s Statement of Work.

The City of Redding has developed a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), that needs to be amended to complete elements of the Action Plan. The current plan employed a few lowcost, high-impact strategies to improve safety, but the City desires to amend the plan address the larger Vision Zero goals, incorporate more aggressive safety strategies, take more of a regional approach, and incorporate projects that include State facilities. The LRSP engaged with a variety of public and private stakeholders to develop plans and projects but to complete the Action Plan the City would expand the scope of the plan, address additional projects and then re-engage and address the community to include the public. The City seeks to increase the project list in order to adopt innovative technologies or strategies to promote safety and equity. The City has committed to a Vision Zero goal, but needs to develop the Action Plan in order to implement the Vision Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Draft Agreement (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 4 of 12
Zero Plan including new projects and strategies to meet the goal. The completed Action Plan will layout the Vision Zero plan for the City of Redding and include a regional approach with the cooperation of Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (MPO) to address State facilities within the region. The completed plan will address Equity within the region and ensure projects are developed appropriately throughout the region.

Significant areas of the City of Redding qualify as disadvantaged communities and have serious safety concerns. The State transportation facilities through the region also have significant safety concerns and the relationship of these facilities to the City of Redding facilities needs to be addressed in the Action Plan. The regional cooperation between Caltrans, SRTA and the City of Redding will allow this plan to meet the Action Planning goals.

3.2 Project’s Estimated Schedule.

ACTION PLAN SCHEDULE
Milestone Schedule Date
Planned Draft Action Plan Completion Date: 12/31/2023
Planned Action Plan Completion Date: 04/01/2024
Planned Action Plan Adoption Date: 05/01/2024
Planned SS4A Final Report Date: 06/01/2024

3.3 Project’s Estimated Costs.
(a) Eligible Project Costs
Eligible Project Costs
SS4A Grant Amount: $240,000.00
Other Federal Funds: $0.00
State Funds: $0.00
Local Funds: $60,000.00
In-Kind Match: $0.00
Other Funds: $0.00
Total Eligible Project Cost: $300,000.00
(b) Supplemental Estimated Budget
Cost Element Federal Share Non-Federal Share Total Budget Amount
Direct Labor $.00 $60,000.00 $60,000.00
Fringe Benefits $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Travel $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Equipment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Draft Agreement (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 5 of 12
Supplies $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Contractual/Consultant $240,000.00 $0.00 $240,000.00
Other $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Indirect Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Total Budget $240,000.00 $60,000.00 $300,000
ARTICLE 4

RECIPIENT INFORMATION

4.1 Recipient’s Unique Entity Identifier.

GRWNHECLZHF1

4.2 Recipient Contact(s).

Zach Bonnin
Transportation Planner
City of Redding
777 Cypress Ave. Redding, CA 96001
530-225-4049
[email protected]

4.3 Recipient Key Personnel.

Name Title or Position
Zach Bonnin Transportation Planner

4.4 USDOT Project Contact(s).

Darren Thacker
Safe Streets and Roads for All Program Manager
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Safety
HSSA-1, Mail Stop: E71-117
1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.

Washington, DC 20590
202-366-6049
[email protected]
and
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Draft Agreement (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 6 of 12
Ashley Cucchiarelli
Agreement Officer (AO)
Federal Highway Administration
Office of Acquisition and Grants Management
HCFA-33
12300 W Dakota Ave
Lakewood, CO 80228
(720) 963-3589
[email protected]
and
Division Administrator
Agreement Officer’s Representative (AOR)
FHWA California Division Office
650 Capitol Mall, Ste. 4-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
[email protected]
and
Ivy Attah
California Division Office Point of Contact
Operations Engineer
650 Capitol Mall, Suite 4-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 498-5860
[email protected]
Backup Calif. Div. Office POC: [email protected]
ARTICLE 5

USDOT ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION

5.1 Office for Subaward and Contract Authorization.

USDOT Office for Subaward and Contract Authorization: FHWA Office of Acquisition and Grants Management

SUBAWARDS AND CONTRACTS APPROVAL
Note: See 2 CFR § 200.331, Subrecipient and contractor determinations, for definitions of subrecipient (who is awarded a subaward) versus contractor (who is awarded a contract).

Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Draft Agreement (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 7 of 12
Note: Recipients with a procurement system deemed approved and accepted by the Government or by the AO are exempt from the requirements of this clause. See 2 CFR 200.317 through 200.327.

Note: This clause is only applicable to Action Plan Grants.

Unless described in the application and funded in the approved award, the Recipient must obtain prior written approval from the AO for the subaward, transfer, or contracting out of any work under this award above the Simplified Acquisition Threshold. This provision does not apply to the acquisition of supplies, material, equipment, or general support services. Approval of each subaward or contract is contingent upon the Recipient’s submittal of a written fair and reasonable price determination, and approval by the AO for each proposed contractor/subrecipient. Consent to enter into subawards or contracts will be issued through written notification from the AO or a formal amendment to the Agreement.

The following subawards and contracts are currently approved under the Agreement by the AO.

This list does not include supplies, material, equipment, or general support services which are exempt from the pre-approval requirements of this clause. (Fill in at award or by amendment)

5.2 Reimbursement Requests
(a) The Recipient may request reimbursement of costs incurred in the performance of this agreement if those costs do not exceed the funds available under section 2.2 and are allowable under the applicable cost provisions of 2 C.F.R. Part 200, Subpart E. The Recipient shall not request reimbursement more frequently than monthly. (b) The Recipient shall use the DELPHI eInvoicing System to submit requests for reimbursement to the payment office. When requesting reimbursement of costs incurred or credit for cost share incurred, the Recipient shall electronically submit supporting cost detail with the SF 271 (Outlay Report and Request for Reimbursement for Construction Programs) to clearly document all costs incurred. (c) The Recipient’s supporting cost detail shall include a detailed breakout of all costs incurred, including direct labor, indirect costs, other direct costs, travel, etc., and the Recipient shall identify the Federal share and the Recipient’s share of costs. If the Recipient does not provide sufficient detail in a request for reimbursement, the AO may withhold processing that request until the Recipient provides sufficient detail. (d) The USDOT shall not reimburse costs unless the Agreement Officer’s Representative (the “AOR”) reviews and approves the costs to ensure that progress on this agreement is sufficient to substantiate payment.
(e) The USDOT may waive the requirement that the Recipient use the DELPHI eInvoicing System. The Recipient may obtain waiver request forms on the DELPHI eInvoicing website (http://www.dot.gov/cfo/delphi-einvoicing-system.html) or by contacting the Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Draft Agreement (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 8 of 12
AO. A Recipient who seeks a waiver shall explain why they are unable to use or access the Internet to register and enter payment requests and send a waiver request to Director of the Office of Financial Management
US Department of Transportation,
Office of Financial Management B-30, Room W93-431
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE
Washington DC 20590-0001
or
[email protected].

If the USDOT grants the Recipient a waiver, the Recipient shall submit SF 271s directly to:

DOT/FAA
P.O. Box 268865
Oklahoma City, OK 73125-8865
Attn: Agreement Specialist
(f) The requirements set forth in these terms and conditions supersede previous financial invoicing requirements for Recipients.

ARTICLE 6

SPECIAL GRANT TERMS

6.1 SS4A funds must be expended within five years after the grant agreement is executed and DOT obligates the funds, which is the budget period end date in section 10.3 of the Terms and Conditions and section 4 in Article 2

6.2 The Recipient acknowledges that the Action Plan will be made publicly available, and the Recipient agrees that it will publish the final Action Plan on a publicly available website.

6.3 The Recipient demonstrates compliance with civil rights obligations and nondiscrimination laws, including Titles VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and accompanying regulations. Recipients of Federal transportation funding will also be required to comply fully with regulations and guidance for the ADA, Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and all other civil rights requirements.

6.4 There are no other special grant requirements for this award.

Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Draft Agreement (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 9 of 12

ATTACHMENT A

PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT INFORMATION
Study Area: City of Redding City Limits
Baseline Measurement Date: 06/01/2023
Baseline Report Date: 06/01/2024
Table 1: Performance Measure Table
Measure Category and Description Measurement
Frequency
Equity
Percent of Funds to Underserved
Communities: Funding amount (of total
project amount) benefitting underserved
communities, as defined by USDOT
End of period of
performance
Costs
Project Costs: Quantification of the cost
of each eligible project carried out using
the grant
End of period of
performance
Lessons Learned and
Recommendations
Lessons Learned and Recommendations:

Description of lessons learned and any
recommendations relating to future
projects of strategies to prevent death and
serious injury on roads and streets.

End of period of
performance
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Draft Agreement (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 10 of 12

ATTACHMENT B

CHANGES FROM APPLICATION
INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING ATTACHMENT B: Describe all material differences between the scope, schedule, and budget described in the application and the scope, schedule, and budget described in Article 3. The purpose of this attachment B is to document the differences clearly and accurately in scope, schedule, and budget to establish the parties’ knowledge and acceptance of those differences. See section 10.1.

Scope: N/A There have been no changes to the Scope as described in the application Schedule: N/A There have been no changes to the Schedule as described in the application Budget: N/A There have been no changes to the Budget as described in the application The table below provides a summary comparison of the project budget.

Fund Source
Application Section 3.3
$ % $ %
Previously Incurred Costs
(Non-Eligible Project Costs)
Federal Funds
Non-Federal Funds
Total Previously Incurred Costs
Future Eligible Project Costs
SS4AFunds
Other Federal Funds
Non-Federal Funds
Total Future Eligible Project
Costs
Total Project Costs
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Draft Agreement (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 11 of 12

ATTACHMENT C

RACIAL EQUITY AND BARRIERS TO OPPORTUNITY

1. Efforts to Improve Racial Equity and Reduce Barriers to Opportunity.

The Recipient states that rows marked with “X” in the following table are accurate:

A racial equity impact analysis has been completed for the Project. (Identify a report on that analysis or, if no report was produced, describe the analysis and its results in the supporting narrative below.)
X
The Recipient or a project partner has adopted an equity and inclusion program/plan or has otherwise instituted equity-focused policies related to project procurement, material sourcing, construction, inspection, hiring, or other activities designed to ensure racial equity in the overall delivery and implementation of the Project. (Identify the relevant programs, plans, or policies in the supporting narrative below.)
The Project includes physical-barrier-mitigating land bridges, caps, lids, linear parks, and multimodal mobility investments that either redress past barriers to opportunity or that proactively create new connections and opportunities for underserved communities that are underserved by transportation. (Identify the relevant investments in the supporting narrative below.) The Project includes new or improved walking, biking, and rolling access for individuals with disabilities, especially access that reverses the disproportional impacts of crashes on people of color and mitigates neighborhood bifurcation. (Identify the new or improved access in the supporting narrative below.) The Project includes new or improved freight access to underserved communities to increase access to goods and job opportunities for those underserved communities. (Identify the new or improved access in the supporting narrative below.)
The Recipient has taken other actions related to the Project to improve racial equity and reduce barriers to opportunity, as described in the supporting narrative below.

The Recipient has not yet taken actions related to the Project to improve racial equity and reduce barriers to opportunity but, before beginning construction of the project, will take relevant actions described in the supporting narrative below
The Recipient has not taken actions related to the Project to improve racial equity and reduce barriers to opportunity and will not take those actions under this award.

2. Supporting Narrative.

As a California city, it is required to have a DBE, MBE, WBE, plans that are required for all purchasing or contracting.

Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: Draft Agreement (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 12 of 12
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Draft Agreement (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the following actions relative to the City of Redding Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP):
(1) Adopt Resolution approving the LRSP; and
(2) Find that the action is statutorily exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15262 – Feasibility and Planning Studies.

Fiscal Impact
An amount of $72,000 in state funds was allocated to the City of Redding (City) with a local match from Street Division funds of $8,000, to cover the cost of the LRSP.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose to decline approval of the LRSP. This would jeopardize the award of future grant funds.

Background/Analysis
Each state maintains a Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), which is a data-driven safety plan outlining measures to reduce traffic accident fatalities and serious injuries. The main components making up the SHSP are Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies, also known as the five E’s. An LRSP similar to the SHSP is a means for local agencies to investigate and analyze traffic related safety needs and issues for local roads and present systemic solutions for potential implementation. Since 2009, the City has been successful in securing several federal grants through the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) administered by California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), including safety improvements to Victor Ave, Cypress Ave, Hartnell Ave, Churn Creek Road, and others. Due to a change in state policy, an approved LRSP is now a mandatory requirement for HSIP grant application eligibility.

MEETING DATE: February 15, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Approve Local Road Safety Plan
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Report to Redding City Council February 7, 2022
Re: 4.11(a)--Local Road Safety Plan Page 2
On November 19, 2019, the Council directed staff to apply for LRSP funding for the purpose of creating an LRSP. On February 4, 2020, the Council accepted grant funding from the State of California Local Roadway Safety Plan Program and staff hired GHD, Inc., to develop the LRSP.

In following the overall LRSP process, a Stakeholder Working Group was formed with the City as the lead and individuals from local organizations representing the five E’s noted above including public safety agencies, engineers, school districts, County Health and Human Services, and planners. This group gathered for meetings to discuss the overall collision analysis, goals, priorities, safety recommendations, and development of the safety plan.

Based on the collision data analysis and the stakeholder working group input, the LRSP includes a citywide analysis of the roadway system in Redding comprising of the current collision patterns and high-risk roadway characteristics (systemic analysis). The goal of the LRSP is to identify safety countermeasures to help mitigate the City’s primary crash type trends and reduce the overall collision severity, and to also address multiple SHSP challenge areas such as pedestrians, bicyclists, distracted driving, intersections, and aggressive driving. The nonengineering strategies were also developed through stakeholder engagement. The engineering countermeasures in the plan coincide with HSIP funding.

Staff has reviewed the action and determined that it is Statutorily Exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies, as the LRSP only involves planning studies for possible future actions the Council has not approved, adopted, or funded. Any future action would require approval, funding, and independent evaluation under CEQA. Adoption of the plan would not result in physical alteration of the environment, and the action has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

The Resolution has been approved to form by the City Attorney.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.

Attachments
Resolution
Notice of Exemption (unfiled) (available online)
Draft Local Road Safety Plan (available online)
Local Road Safety Plan Appendices (available online)
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

TO APPROVE THE LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN
WHEREAS, on February 4, 2020, the City Council accepted grant funding from the State of California Local Roadway Safety Plan Program to develop the Local Road Safety Plan; and WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan was created for the purpose of complying with new state and federal requirements related to the Highway Safety Improvement Plan (HSIP); and WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan includes a citywide analysis of the roadway system and identifies safety countermeasures to help mitigate primary crash trends and reduce the overall collision severity by addressing multiple challenge areas such as pedestrians, bicyclists, distracted driving, intersections, and aggressive driving; and
WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan is a requirement for future HSIP grant applications; and WHEREAS, the Local Road Safety Plan has been developed through the coordinated efforts of City staff and consultants, stakeholder working group meetings, and input from the public; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding hereby:

1. Determines that adoption of the 2021 Local Road Safety Plan is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the Feasibility and Planning Studies exemption (14 CCR 15262), as the plan would not result in physical alteration of the environment and implementation of any future action would require approval, funding, and independent evaluation under CEQA.

2. Approves the Local Road Safety Plan;
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 15th day of February, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________
KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
______________________________ ______________________________ PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Packet Pg. 228
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Street Address City State Zip Code
Redding Local Road Safety Plan | February 15, 2022

LOCAL ROAD

SAFETY PLAN
(LRSP)
City of Redding
Draft Report
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) This page was intentionally left blank.

Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page i

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A special thanks to all the Safety Partners that contributed to this plan.

City of Redding
Mayor and City Council
Public Works Department
Police Department
Fire Department
County of Shasta
Public Works Department
Health and Human Services
Shasta Regional Transportation Agency
Redding Unified School District
Healthy Shasta Partnership
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page ii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In 2019, the City of Redding was awarded a state grant from Caltrans to perform a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP). The LRSP is a requirement for Cycle 11 of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The LRSP grant application included a citywide analysis of the roadway system in Redding comprising of the current collisions patterns and high-risk roadway characteristics (systemic analysis).

Furthermore, the Redding’s goal is to identify safety countermeasures to help mitigate the City’s primary crash type trends and reduce the overall collision severity.

The LRSP is a collaborative process that is similar to a Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR) except a LRSP has a local leadership group that represents the 5 E’s (not just engineering) and public outreach.

The 5 E’s of traffic safety include Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Services, and Emerging Technologies.

This holistic approach allows certain areas of concern not showing a crash pattern to be analyzed. Also, it fosters local, state, and agency partnerships to advance local road safety.

In following the overall LRSP process, a Stakeholder Working Group (Working Group) was formed with the City as the lead and local organizations from the 5 E’s and anyone with an interest in improving the City’s roadway safety. This group gathered for meetings to discuss the overall collision analysis, goals, priorities, safety recommendations, and overall development of the safety plan.

Based on the past 5 years collision analysis and the City’s Stakeholder Working Group Meetings, this LRSP will address multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge (Emphasis) Areas including but not limited to:

1. Pedestrians

2. Distracted Driving

3. Bicyclists

4. Intersections

5. Impaired Driving

6. Aggressive Driving/Speeding

7. Roadway Design
a. Additional emphasis area per Stakeholder Working Group not in SHSP In addition, the vision, mission statement, and goals were established in guiding the development of the LRSP. It was also decided that the LRSP for the City of Redding would be a living document with official updated every five (5) years.

Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page iii
Data analysis, public input, and City feedback helped to determine the priority locations in the City. These locations, along with their proposed countermeasures, are shown in the tables below.

Priority Intersections and Recommended Countermeasures

Intersection Recommended Countermeasures
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Systemic (49 locations) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Install left-turn lane and add turn phase in westbound direction Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection
Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Increase DUI enforcement
Consolidate driveways
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection
Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) Bicycle education about riding at night and rules of the road Butte St / Continental
St
None (upcoming safety project addresses current collision trends) Market St / Riverside
Dr Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.)
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through Intersection) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Increase DUI enforcement
Churn Creek Rd /
Hartnell Ave
Hartnell Ave / Bechelli
Ln
South St / California St
Systemic (9 locations)
Victor Ave / Hartnell
Ave
Hartnell Ave /
Northwoods Way
Churn Creek Rd / E
Cypress Ave
Airport Rd / Preserve
Blvd
E Cypress Ave /
Bechelli Ln
Hilltop Dr / E Cypress
Ave
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page iv
Priority Segments and Recommended Countermeasures
It is important to understand the upcoming funding opportunities in the successful implementation of these safety projects. Most of the proposed countermeasures are HSIP fundable (next cycle 11 is scheduled to open in April 2022). However, countermeasures can be implemented through other funding sources to include
• Active Transportation Program (ATP)
o Next call for funding projects is scheduled to start in March 2022 • Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) program
• Sustainable Transportation Planning Grant (Sustainable Communities) • Stimulus funding sources
Segment Recommended Countermeasures
Add segment lighting (East of I-5 Interchange)
Install raised median (Between Hilltop Dr and Churn Creek Rd) Install bike lanes/Install separated bike lanes
Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways Install raised median (Between Dana Dr and Browning Dr) Install edge-lines and centerlines (between Ross/Big-Lots Driveway and Margalia St) Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers
Pedestrian fencing along sidewalk to guide pedestrians to the enhanced crosswalk with RRFB
Install chevron signs on horizontal curves
Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway) Install delineators, reflectors, and/or object markers
Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
Install multiuse path/ sharrow on eastbound approach to the intersection of W Cypress Ave/ Market St
Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs
Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways Add Segment Lighting
Install curve advance warning signs
Increase DUI enforcement
Add Segment Lighting
Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes from 4 to 3 and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes) Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points Install raised median (on the approaches to Hartnell Ave) Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points Railroad Ave (South St
to Buenaventura Blvd) Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs S Bonnyview Rd (S
Market St to Churn
Creek Rd)
Install Separated Bike Lanes
Bechelli Ln (E Cypress
Ave to n/o 3rd St)
Railroad Ave (South St
to Buenaventura Blvd)
W Cypress Ave (Market
St to Park Marina Dr)
Churn Creek Rd
(Presidio St to S
Bonnyview Rd)
Hilltop Dr (n/o
Browning St to
Maraglia St)
E Cypress Ave (Park
Marina Dr to Churn
Creek Rd)
Hilltop Dr (n/o Redding
Hilltop Apartments to
St Thomas Pkwy)
Hartnell Ave
(Goodwater Ave to
Airport Rd)
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page v
• Capital Improvement Program or with on-going maintenance work Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page vi

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1

2. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................ 2

2.1 Purpose and Need ............................................................................................................. 2 City Roadways .................................................................................................. 3 California Strategic Highway Safety Plan ......................................................... 4

3. SAFETY PARTNERS/STAKEHOLDERS .................................................................................... 6 Stakeholder Working Group Meetings ............................................................. 6

3.2 SHSP Challenge/Emphasis Areas ..................................................................................... 7

3.3 Guiding Principles .............................................................................................................. 7 Vision Zero ........................................................................................................ 7 Vision ................................................................................................................ 8 Mission Statement ............................................................................................ 9 Goals ................................................................................................................ 9

4. ANALYZE SAFETY DATA ......................................................................................................... 10

4.1 Recent/Planned Safety Projects ...................................................................................... 10 Active Transportation Program (ATP) ............................................................ 10 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) .............................................. 11 SR 273 Multimodal Corridor Plan ................................................................... 13

4.2 Collision Data ................................................................................................................... 14 Collisions on City Roadways .......................................................................... 14 Collisions on Caltrans Roadways ................................................................... 18 Collisions Related to Challenge Areas ........................................................... 19

4.2.3.1 Pedestrians ..................................................................................................... 19

4.2.3.2 Distracted Driving ........................................................................................... 21

4.2.3.3 Bicyclists ......................................................................................................... 22

4.2.3.4 Intersections ................................................................................................... 23

4.2.3.5 Impaired Driving.............................................................................................. 24

5. PUBLIC OUTREACH ................................................................................................................. 25

5.1 Public Website ................................................................................................................. 25 Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page vii
Interactive Map ............................................................................................... 25 Public Survey .................................................................................................. 27

6. IDENTIFY STRATEGIES ........................................................................................................... 31

6.1 Engineering Strategies ..................................................................................................... 31 City Intersection Projects ................................................................................ 31 City Segment Analysis .................................................................................... 33 Speed Mitigation ............................................................................................. 34

6.1.3.1 Traffic Calming ................................................................................................ 34

6.1.3.2 Assembly Bill No. 43 ....................................................................................... 35 Systemic Safety Countermeasures ................................................................ 35

6.1.4.1 Leading Pedestrian Intervals .......................................................................... 36 Projects Suggested through Public Input ....................................................... 38 Additional Safety Projects ............................................................................... 38

6.2 Non-Engineering Strategies ............................................................................................. 39 Education ........................................................................................................ 39 Emerging Technologies .................................................................................. 39 Enforcement ................................................................................................... 39 Emergency Response .................................................................................... 40

7. PRIORITIZE & INCORPORATE STRATEGIES ........................................................................ 41

8. EVALUATION PROCESS .......................................................................................................... 44

9. NEXT STEPS ............................................................................................................................. 47

10. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... 48

FIGURE INDEX
Figure 1 California SHSP (2020-2024) ............................................................................................ 1 Figure 2 FHWA’s LRSP Development Process ............................................................................... 1 Figure 3 Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions in the City of Redding ................................................. 2 Figure 5 FHWA’s LRSP Development Map ..................................................................................... 5 Figure 6 Traditional Approach vs. Vision Zero ................................................................................ 8 Figure 7 Recent and Planned Safety Projects in Redding ............................................................ 12 Figure 8 Total Collisions on City Roadways (2015-2019) ............................................................. 14 Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page viii
Figure 9 Top Violation Categories on City Roadways ................................................................... 15 Figure 10 Collision Density on City Roads (2015-2019) .................................................................. 15 Figure 12 Summary of City Collisions (2015-2019) ......................................................................... 17 Figure 13 Collision Density on Caltrans Roads ............................................................................... 19 Figure 14 Pedestrian Location at Time of Collision ......................................................................... 20 Figure 15 Density of Pedestrian Collisions ...................................................................................... 21 Figure 16 Type of Inattention for Distracted Driving Collisions........................................................ 22 Figure 17 Top Violation Categories for Bicycle-Related Collisions ................................................. 22 Figure 18 Density of Bicycle Collisions ............................................................................................ 23 Figure 19 Top Violation Categories for Intersection-Related Collisions .......................................... 24 Figure 20 Collision Types for DUI/BUI Collisions ............................................................................ 24 Figure 21 Public Website Home Page ............................................................................................. 25 Figure 22 Public Website Interactive Map ....................................................................................... 27 Figure 23 Public-Identified Roadway Issues ................................................................................... 28 Figure 24 Responses to “Which of the following bikeways would you feel comfortable using?” .... 28 Figure 25 Responses to “Would you be willing to use alternate modes of travel (walking, biking, public transit, etc.) to get to work, school, shopping, etc.?” ....................................................... 29 Figure 26 Locations of Proposed Leading Pedestrian Intervals ...................................................... 37 Figure 27 Low Resource Neighborhoods and Priority Locations in Redding .................................. 46

TABLE INDEX
Table 1 Fatal Collisions on City of Redding Roadways (2015-2019) ............................................. 3 Table 2 Comprehensive Collision Costs and EPDO Weights (2018 dollars) ............................... 17 Table 3 Top Intersections, per Collision Analysis ......................................................................... 18 Table 4 Top Segments, per Collision Analysis ............................................................................. 18 Table 5 Priority Intersections and Crash Rates ............................................................................ 32 Table 6 Priority Segments and Crash Rates ................................................................................ 33 Table 7 Recommended Systemic Safety Countermeasures........................................................ 36 Table 8 Projects Suggested through Public Input ........................................................................ 38 Table 9 Priority of City Intersection Projects ................................................................................ 42 Table 10 Priority of City Segment Projects ..................................................................................... 43 Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page ix

APPENDIX INDEX
Appendix A Collision Data
Appendix B Stakeholder and Public Input
Appendix C Previous Safety Plans and Projects
Appendix D Recommended Projects

Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page x

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials ADA Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
APS Accessible Pedestrian Signal
ATP Active Transportation Program or Plan
BCR Benefit to Cost Ratio
BUI Biking Under the Influence
CA MUTCD California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices CIP Capital Improvement Program
CMAQ Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality
DUI Driving Under the Influence
EPDO Equivalent Property Damage Only
FHWA Federal Highway Administration
FSI Fatal or Severe Injury
HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program
HSM Highway Safety Manual
LRSM Local Roadway Safety Manual
LRSP Local Road Safety Plan
SHSP Strategic Highway Safety Plan
SSAR Systemic Safety Analysis Report
SWITRS Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System
TIMS Transportation Injury Mapping System
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 1

1. INTRODUCTION
The project involves the development of a Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP), which provides local agencies an opportunity to address unique roadway safety needs in their jurisdictions. This comprehensive document will both help to guide City in safety countermeasures and allow eligibility for funding in future HSIP applications. The process of preparing an LRSP creates a framework to systematically identify and analyze local safety problems and recommend engineering safety improvements for future Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) funding.

Figure 1 California SHSP (2020-2024)
Preparing an LRSP facilitates local agency
partnerships and collaboration, resulting in a
prioritized list of improvements and actions that
contribute to California’s Strategic Highway Safety
Plan (SHSP) overall vision and goals. This SHSP
focuses on reducing fatal and severe injury collisions
(FSI collisions) with focused challenge areas with a
focus on the Five “E’s” of Traffic Safety (see Figure
1).

The City and GHD will follow the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Local Road Safety six (6) step process as shown in Figure 2:

Figure 2 FHWA’s LRSP Development Process
In working with the first step of establishing leadership, Shelby Nadin, Traffic Operations Manager, was identified as the Safety Champion/Lead for this project with a stakeholder working group that consisted of the other E’s (enforcement, education, emergency response, and emerging technologies) and other important safety partners. This stakeholder working group was paramount in creating a comprehensive safety plan that is tailored to address the local needs and issues.

Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 2

2. BACKGROUND

2.1 Purpose and Need
The City of Redding has a current approximate population of 91,000 and is located in Shasta County, California. Redding’s “2000-2020 General Plan” evaluates how the City growth and development will occur. The Transportation Element of this plan contains fifteen (15) goals for Redding’s transportation system. The goals include providing safe, efficient, and comfortable multimodal transportation, creating Complete Street systems, maintaining downtown’s vitality, improving safety at railroad crossings, promoting public transit, and protecting residential neighborhoods from excessive through traffic.

In focusing in on the roadway safety needs, the past five (5) years of collisions (2015-2019) were evaluated for the City roadways and the fatal collisions are discussed below. Figure 3 presents a map of the twenty-four (24) fatal and ninety-three (93) severe injury collisions in the City from the past five years.

More information on fatal and severe injury (FSI) collisions is located in Appendix A: Collision Data.

Figure 3 Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions in the City of Redding Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 3
City Roadways
During the five-year period (2015-2019), there were twenty-four (24) fatal collisions recorded for the roadways under the City of Redding’s jurisdiction. The fatal collisions on City streets had the following characteristics (see Table 1 below):

Table 1 Fatal Collisions on City of Redding Roadways (2015-2019) In improving roadway safety for the City of Redding, it is important to focus on mitigating these high injury collisions and loss of life.

Year Location Type Violation Other Information
2015 Hartnell Avenue, 147 feet west of Airport Road Overturned DUI Single vehicle 2015 Bechelli Lane, 129 feet south of Beagle Lane VehiclePedestrian Pedestrian
Violation
Pedestrian was crossing not in a
crosswalk
2015 Railroad Avenue, 1264 feet north of
Buenaventura Boulevard
VehiclePedestrian - Pedestrian was not in the road
2015 Churn Creek Road and Hartnell Avenue Broadside Unsafe Speed Motorcycle collision 2015 Butte Street and Continental Street Head On Automobile Right of Way Bicycle collision
2015 Airport Road and Preserve Boulevard Broadside Improper Turning Bicycle collision 2015 Delta Street at Santa Fe Avenue Broadside Automobile Right of Way -
2016 Hilltop Drive, 1062 feet north of Peppertree
Lane
VehiclePedestrianPedestrian
Violation
Pedestrian was crossing not in a
crosswalk
2016 Cypress Avenue, 360 feet west of Athens
Avenue
VehiclePedestrianPedestrian
Violation
Pedestrian was crossing not in a
crosswalk
2016 Hartnell Avenue at Northwoods Drive Broadside DUI - 2016 Buenaventura Boulevard and Lakeside Drive Broadside Automobile Right of Way -
2017 Hartnell Avenue, 250 feet east of Churn Creek
Road Broadside Automobile Right of Way Bicycle collision 2017 Hartnell Avenue at Middleton Lane Broadside Automobile Right of Way Motorcycle collision
2017 Churn Creek Road and Hartnell Avenue Rear End DUI / Unsafe Speed -
2017 Beltline Road and Mountain Lakes Boulevard Broadside Automobile Right of Way -
2017 Market Street at Riverside Drive VehiclePedestrian Pedestrian
Violation -
2018 Churn Creek Road, 106 feet south of Presidio
Street Hit Object Unsafe Lane Change Single vehicle
2018 Cypress Avenue, 165 feet west of Rosemary
Avenue
VehiclePedestrianPedestrian Right
of Way
Pedestrian was crossing in a
crosswalk not at an intersection
2018 South Street and California Street. Broadside Traffic Signals and Signs -
2018 Hartnell Avenue and Bechelli Lane VehiclePedestrian Pedestrian
Violation
Pedestrian was crossing in a
crosswalk at an intersection
2018 Railroad Avenue and Placer Street VehiclePedestrian Pedestrian
Violation
Pedestrian was crossing in a
crosswalk at an intersection
2019 Hilltop Drive, 548 feet north of Mistletoe Lane VehiclePedestrian DUI Pedestrian was crossing in a crosswalk at an intersection at night
2019 Hartnell Ave and Shotwick Trail Hit Object Unsafe Speed Single vehicle collisions where motorcycle ran off the road
2019 Old Eureka Way and Walnut Avenue Hit Object Wrong Side of Road Single vehicle
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 4

2.2 Standards and Guidelines
In developing the City of Redding LRSP, the following standards and guidelines were followed:
• “Local Roadway Safety, A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners”, Caltrans, Version 1.5, April 2020.
• 2020-2024 California’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), “California Safe Roads: 2020-2024 Strategic Highway Safety Plan”, Caltrans.
• “Local and Rural Road Safety Briefing Sheets: Local Road Safety Plans,” Federal Highway Administration, November 2014.
• “Developing Safety Plans, A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners”, Federal Highway Administration, March 2012.
• “Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool,” Federal Highway Administration, 2013. • “Highway Safety Manual”, American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO), 1st Edition, 2014 supplement.
• “California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)”, Revision 5, 2014.

California Strategic Highway Safety Plan
The LRSP will complement California’s SHSP 2020-2024. Per this plan the recommended challenge areas area shown in Figure 4. These challenge areas are recommended emphasis areas in the development of the plan.

Figure 4 SHSP Challenge Areas

2.3 LRSP Methodology
The LRSP methodology followed the FHWA’s LRSP development process as shown in Figure 5.

Below is a roadmap created by the Federal Highway Administration to show the process of creating the Local Road Safety Plan. Here are the primary steps used to create this plan:

Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 5

1. Identify Stakeholders
a. Stakeholder Working Group was formed of the 5 E’s and other safety partners.

2. Use Safety Data
a. Past 5 years of collisions were analysed with discussion of other high-risk locations.

3. Chose Proven Solutions
a. FHWA Proven Countermeasures and Caltrans safety countermeasures were used in mitigation collision trends and risk characteristics.

4. Implement Solutions
a. Projects were identified for specific locations and systemically.

Figure 5 FHWA’s LRSP Development Map
Source: Federal Highway Administration

Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 6

3. SAFETY PARTNERS/STAKEHOLDERS

3.1 LRSP Stakeholder Working Group Members
Based on community connections, the City of Redding led the formation of the LRSP Stakeholder Working Member Group. This leadership group was crucial in the development of the LRSP and helped in capturing the safety needs, goals, and priorities including safety countermeasures for the City of Redding.

The LRSP Stakeholder Working Group included the
following representatives:
• City of Redding
• Caltrans
• Shasta County Public Works
• Redding Police Department
• Redding Fire Department
• Redding Unified School District
• Health Shasta Partnership and Shasta County Health and Human Services
• Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA)
Stakeholder Working Group Meetings
Two meetings were held with the stakeholder working group and facilitated by GHD. The virtual meetings were as follows:

1. December 10, 2020 – 10 a.m. to noon
a. Discussed the LRSP overall process, stakeholder working group member’s safety priorities, past 5 years of collisions (City and Caltrans roadways), vision, goals, and priorities.

2. May 3, 2021 – 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m.
a. Reviewed first meeting, discussed public comments and ways to address their concerns, recent developments, safety countermeasures and projects, refined of LRSP’s guiding principles, and coordinated next steps.

The meeting summaries for the stakeholder working group meetings are in Appendix B: Stakeholder and Public Input. The stakeholder working group also provided their feedback and comments on the Draft Local Road Safety Plan document before the plan was finalized. With many of the safety countermeasures to include engineering, enforcement, and emergency response, it is important to have buy off from the stakeholders in understanding how the plan will be implemented.

Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 7

3.2 SHSP Challenge/Emphasis Areas
Based on the LRSP Stakeholder Working Group Meetings, this LRSP will address multiple Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) Challenge Areas and additional emphasis areas, as suggested by the stakeholders, including:

1. Pedestrians
a. Focus on pedestrian crossings and enhancing existing pedestrian crossings. b. Safety around school zones

2. Distracted Driving
a. Rear end collisions due to distracted driving

3. Bicyclists
a. Reduce wrong-way cycling

4. Intersections
a. Find beneficial projects on west side of the City

5. Impaired Driving
a. Focus enforcement to mitigate DUI/BUI collisions

6. Aggressive Driving/Speeding
a. Speed management
i. Traffic calming devices to mitigate speed

7. Roadway Design
a. Geometric design to provide for all users
i. Identify lack of accommodations and connections for bike, ped, and transit users
ii. Provide access management as appropriate

3.3 Guiding Principles
The members of the stakeholder working group coordinated to establish the vision, mission statement, and goals that guided the development of the document. Ideally, this document will help the City move toward Vision Zero. The aim of Vision Zero is to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy, and equitable mobility for all. Traditionally, traffic deaths and severe injuries have been considered as inevitable side effects of modern life. The reality is that these tragedies can be addressed over time by taking a proactive, preventative approach that prioritizes traffic safety as a public health issue.

Vision Zero
Vision Zero is a significant departure from the status quo in two major ways:
• Vision Zero recognizes that people will sometimes make mistakes, so the road system and related policies should be designed to minimize those inevitable mistakes and reduce their likeliness to result in severe injuries or fatalities. This means that system designers and policymakers are Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 8
expected to improve the roadway environment, policies (such as speed management), and other related systems to lessen the severity of crashes. Roadway users are however still responsible for their mistakes and should follow all applicable laws and use reasonable judgement when conducting themselves within the public right of way.
• Vision Zero is a multidisciplinary approach, bringing together diverse and necessary stakeholders to address this complex problem. In the past, meaningful, cross-disciplinary collaboration among local traffic planners and engineers, policymakers, and public health professionals has not been the norm. Vision Zero acknowledges that many factors contribute to safe mobility -- including roadway design, speeds, behaviors, technology, and policies -- and sets clear goals to achieve the shared goal of zero fatalities and severe injuries.

As shown in Figure 6, is the comparison of the traditional approach versus the Vision Zero approach.

Figure 6 Traditional Approach vs. Vision Zero
Vision
A vision statement describes what the Local Road Safety Plan is trying to achieve.

Redding will develop a comprehensive
safety plan with engagement of
stakeholders and citizens that encourages
improved safety for all users, whether it is
walking, biking, and driving – because
every person in our community matters.

Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 9
Mission Statement
The mission statement defines the purpose of the plan, what it does, and what it is about. The mission statement was developed in collaboration with the stakeholder working group.

Goals
Safety goals were development for the Local Road Safety Plan. It is important to capture realistic goals that can be measurable or evolve over time.

Goal: Reduce the potential for fatal and
severe injury collisions citywide.

Goal: Create a safe, livable, and
welcoming community by developing a
roadway safety plan targeted to Redding’s
transportation and roadway safety needs.

Goal: Improve safety around schools.

Goal: Reduce speeding collisions through
engineering, enforcement, and education
strategies.

Goal: Improve multimodal transportation
safety by expanding the City’s nonmotorized transportation infrastructure.

Goal: Improve the health and vitality of our community by working with community safety partners to create a roadway safety plan targeted to Redding’s needs.

Goal: Reduce rear end collisions citywide by implementing speed management strategies.

Goal: Prioritize improvements that affect conditions/safety outcomes for identified disadvantaged populations.

The City of Redding shall utilize a datadriven approach to provide a safe, sustainable, and equitable multimodal
transportation system for all users of the
public roadway network in Redding.

Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 10

4. ANALYZE SAFETY DATA

4.1 Recent/Planned Safety Projects
The City of Redding and Caltrans have conducted some previous safety analysis that has developed the following planned safety projects. The primary source of funding for the current safety projects in the City are the Caltrans’ Active Transportation Program and Highway Safety Improvement Program. Refer to Appendix C: Previous Safety Plans and Projects for specific project details and additional funding sources for other safety projects.

Active Transportation Program (ATP)
The City of Redding received one (1) ATP grant from Cycle 1, two (2) ATP grants from Cycle 2, two (2) ATP grants from Cycle 3, and was recently approved for two (2) ATP applications for Cycle 5.

The details of the ATP projects are as follows:

1. An ATP, Cycle 1 grant was awarded to Redding for the “Placer Street Improvements” project from south of Boston Avenue to Mesa Street. These improvements included sidewalk and curb improvements, signage and striping improvements, and signal modifications. Construction is completed for this project.

2. Two ATP, Cycle 2 grants were awarded for the “Diestelhorst to Downtown Non-Motorized Improvements” project and “Quartz Hill Road Improvements” project. The “Diestelhorst to Downtown Non-Motorized Improvements” project included signage and striping improvements, Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon (RRFB) installation, and buffered bike lanes and will be in construction in 2021. The “Quartz Hill Road Improvements” project limits are Quartz Hill Road from south of Terra Nova Street to Brenton Drive and from west of Delta Street to State Route 273. This project includes road widening and pedestrian crossing improvements.

3. Two ATP, Cycle 3 grants were awarded for the “West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project” and “Bechelli & Loma Vista Corridor Improvements” project. Both projects are currently in design. The “West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project” includes curb and gutter improvements, curb bulb-outs, pedestrian improvements, RRFB installation, additional bicycle markings, buffered bike lanes, and lighting installation. The “Bechelli & Loma Vista Corridor Improvements” project includes the construction of a mix of buffered bike lanes, separated bike lanes, sidewalks, accessible driveways, curb ramps, enhanced crossings with rapid flashing beacons, pedestrian refuge islands, pedestrian safety amenities including safety lighting, and functional landscaping including shade trees and buffers from traffic.

4. Two ATP, Cycle 5 applications were submitted for the “Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project” and the “Victor Ave & Cypress Ave Active Transportation” project. Both projects were recently funded. The “Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project” includes the installation of a buffered 2-way cycle track, shared use path, raised intersection with curb extensions, bollards, lane reductions, raised crosswalks with bicycle and pedestrian separations, and shade trees. The “Victor Ave & Cypress Ave Active Transportation” project plans to construct shared use paths, sidewalks, curb ramps, bike lanes, and protected intersections.

Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 11
Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)
The City of Redding received HSIP grants from Cycle 7, Cycle 8, and Cycle 9, and recently applied for two (2) grants from HSIP Cycle 10. The details of the HSIP projects are as follows:

1. An HSIP, Cycle 7 grant was awarded for the “Hartnell Avenue Safety Improvement Project” and is currently in construction. The “Hartnell Avenue Safety Improvement Project” includes striping improvements, ADA upgrades, lighting improvements, and the installation of a raised median. The project is located on Hartnell Avenue from Churn Creek Road to East Way.

2. An HSIP, Cycle 8 grant was awarded for the “Churn Creek Rd and Maraglia St Safety Improvements” project and will begin construction in 2021. The “Churn Creek Rd and Maraglia St Safety Improvements” project includes curb ramp improvements, additional lighting, and striping improvements on Maraglia Street and Churn Creek Road from E Cypress Road to Hartnell Avenue.

3. An HSIP, Cycle 9 grant was awarded for the “Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements” project at nine (9) different intersections throughout the City and is currently in design. The “Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements” project proposed various enhancements at the intersections including ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance warning signage, refuge island/concrete medians, and detectable warning surface upgrades.

4. Two HSIP, Cycle 10 applications were awarded for the “Systemic Protected Left Turn Project” at four (4) locations throughout the City and the “Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project” at nineteen (19) intersections in the City. The “Systemic Protected Left Turn Project” proposed various upgrades such as micro-surfacing, striping improvements, installation of new traffic signal pole and mast arm, and ADA curb return upgrades. The “Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project” adds new or additional lighting to intersections.

The City was also awarded funding for Cycles 2 through 6 of the HSIP. These projects were not considered for further analysis in the LRSP since they were awarded prior to 2015. These projects include:
• HSIP, Cycle 2: Buenaventura Widening at SR 273
• HSIP, Cycle 3: Old Oregon Trail/Oasis Road Safety Project • HSIP, Cycle 4: Lake Blvd. Safety Project and Buenaventura Blvd. Safety Project • HSIP, Cycle 5: East Cypress Ave. Median Project and Churn Creek Road Widening Project • HSIP, Cycle 6: Victor Ave. Safety Project and Old Oregon Trail Widening Project The recent and planned safety projects in the City are mapped in Figure 7. These projects include funding sources from ATP and HSIP (as shown above) and other funding sources to include Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities Program, Sustainable Transportation Infrastructure (ASHC/STI), Section 130, and the City’s Capital Improvement Program funding. For more information on these safety projects, see Appendix C: Previous Safety Plans and Projects.

Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) FIGURE 7
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
Miles
Project No.

Revision No. -
11215289
Date 03/11/2021

CITY OF REDDING

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
Map Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Horizontal Datum: WGS 1984
Grid: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Paper Size ANSI B
o Data source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2015-2019, Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community. Created by: edarke N:\US\San Luis Obispo\Projects\561\11215289\GIS\Maps\Working\Upcoming Safety Projects-no labels.mxd
Print date: 23 Jun 2021 - 07:46
Legend
Project Type
ATP, Cycle 1
ATP, Cycle 2
ATP, Cycle 3
ATP, Cycle 5
HSIP, Cycle 6
HSIP, Cycle 7
HSIP, Cycle 8
HSIP, Cycle 9
HSIP, Cycle 10

ASHC/STI
Section 130
City CIP
City of Redding
City Limit

CURRENT/UPCOMING SAFETY

PROJECTS IN THE CITY OF REDDING

CITY OF

REDDING
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 13
SR 273 Multimodal Corridor Plan
In 2020, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency (SRTA) was awarded $500,000 for the State Route 273 Multimodal Corridor through a Strategic Partnerships Grant with Caltrans. This grant was for the northern section of SR 273 through Redding (northern terminus to Canyon Road). Caltrans also awarded a $500,000 Special Studies Grant for work on the southern section of SR 273 (Canyon Road to southern terminus).

SRTA hopes to combine the funding for both projects to create a comprehensive multimodal corridor plan for SR 273. If approved by Caltrans, SRTA will coordinate the scope of work with Redding and other affected cities. This project will likely include several multimodal and safety improvements on SR 273 that will benefit the City of Anderson.

Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 14

4.2 Collision Data
The City of Redding collision data was gathered using the Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) and Transportation Injury Mapping System (TIMS). The Redding Police Department provided additional detail to several of the collisions from the SWITRS database. Each data set was analyzed, crosschecked, and compiled into one complete comprehensive data set. This process was done to ensure that all reported collisions occurring within the City are accounted for and to provide additional information that one system may not have captured. The data set contains five years’ worth of collisions spanning from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2019.

These collisions were classified based on roadway jurisdiction (City or Caltrans). During this period, a total of 3468 collisions were reported in the City of Redding. Collisions were further categorized into intersection related collisions and roadway segment related collisions with a separate focus on the City streets and Caltrans roadways.

The pie chart in Figure 8 depicts the number of City collisions by collision location (intersection or segment). The highest number of collisions was at City intersections (1320 collisions).

Figure 8 Total Collisions on City Roadways (2015-2019)
Collisions on City Roadways
There were 2364 collisions recorded on the City roadways between 2015 and 2019. The top five violation categories in order (not including unknown or not stated collisions) for City roadways are shown in the Figure 9. As shown on the collision density map (see Figure 10 below), areas with high density of collisions are mostly concentrated in the downtown area and on the following arterials: E Cypress Avenue, Churn Creek Road, and Hartnell Avenue. There were twenty-four (24) fatal collisions and ninety-three (93) severe injury collisions on the City roadways. Broadside collisions were the most common collision type.

Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 15
Figure 9 Top Violation Categories on City Roadways
Figure 10 Collision Density on City Roads (2015-2019)
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 16
Figure 11 presents a collision density map of the FSI collisions on City of Redding roadways between 2015 and 2019. As seen through this map, the intersection of Churn Creek Road and Hartnell Avenue has a high density of FSI collisions.

Figure 11 Collision Density of Fatal and Severe Injury Collisions on City Roads (2015-2019) Figure 12 summarizes the City collisions based on severity and type.

Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 17
Figure 12 Summary of City Collisions (2015-2019)
The total number of collisions and Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) rating were assessed to determine the top study intersections (refer to Appendix A: Collision Data). Per the Caltrans Local Roadway Safety Manual, it is recommended to rank locations with higher severity as higher focus. The Highway Safety Manual (HSM) methodology of Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) rating assigns a weight to collisions in capturing the relative severity in equivalent property damage only (PDO =1).

Table 2 provides the comprehensive collision costs and EPDO weights that were used in ranking the collisions. Collision costs include both direct and indirect costs. Direct crash costs include ambulance service, police and fire services, property damage, insurance, and other costs directly related to the crashes. Indirect collision costs account for the value society would place on pain and suffering or loss of life associated with the crash.

Table 2 Comprehensive Collision Costs and EPDO Weights (2018 dollars) Severity Comprehensive Costs EPDO Weight
Fatal (K) $6,418,400 544
Severe Injury (A) $345,800 30
Minor Injury (B) $126,500 11
Non-Visible Injury (C) $71,900 6
PDO (O) $11,800 1
Based on Table 7-1, Highway Safety Manual, 2010, Adjusted to 2018 dollars.

Table 3 shows the top intersections, per collision analysis. The intersection of Churn Creek Road and Hartnell Avenue had the highest EPDO score at 1223 and the highest number of collisions at 32.

Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 18
Table 3 Top Intersections, per Collision Analysis
Intersection EPDO Total Crashes
Churn Creek Rd / Hartnell Ave 1223 32
South St / California St 588 10
Hartnell Ave / Bechelli Ln 587 9
Airport Rd / Preserve Blvd 562 4
Butte St / Continental St 562 4
Market St / Riverside Dr 551 3
Hartnell Ave / Northwoods Way 544 1
Churn Creek Rd / E Cypress Ave 169 29
Victor Ave / Hartnell Ave 151 22
Hilltop Dr / E Cypress Ave 127 22
E Cypress Ave / Bechelli Ln 85 20
The segment collisions were also analyzed by EPDO and total number of collisions. Table 4 shows the top segments, per collision analysis. Churn Creek Road between Presidio Street and S Bonnyview Road had the highest EPDO rating (1021) and number of collisions (73).

Table 4 Top Segments, per Collision Analysis
Road Name EPDO Total Crashes
Churn Creek Rd (Presidio St to S Bonnyview Rd) 1021 73
E Cypress Ave (Park Marina Dr to Churn Creek Rd) 876 51 Hilltop Dr (n/o Browning St to Maraglia St) 835 45
Bechelli Ln (E Cypress Ave to n/o 3rd St) 711 29
W Cypress Ave (Market St to Park Marina Dr) 657 15
Railroad Ave (South St to Buenaventura Blvd) 651 10
Hartnell Ave (Goodwater Ave to Airport Rd) 618 7
Hilltop Dr (n/o Redding Hilltop Apartments to St
Thomas Pkwy) 604 11
Hartnell Ave (Northwoods Way to Kenco Ave) 193 30
S Bonnyview Rd (S Market St to Churn Creek Rd) 163 25
Further detailed collision analysis is in Appendix A: Collision Data.

Collisions on Caltrans Roadways
There were 1104 collisions reported to SWITRS at roadways under Caltrans jurisdiction between 2015 and 2019, including mainline collisions. As seen by the collision density map provided by TIMS (see Figure 13), the area where State Route 273 intersects State Route 299 has a high density of collisions.

This map excludes property damage only collisions. Caltrans does not currently have any planned safety improvements at this location.

Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 19
Figure 13 Collision Density on Caltrans Roads
Collisions Related to Challenge Areas

4.2.3.1 Pedestrians
There were one hundred and sixty-three (163) total pedestrian collisions on City roadways. The pedestrian location at the time of collision, along with corresponding severity, is shown in Figure 14.

There were nine (9) fatal and fifteen (15) severe injury collisions with pedestrians involved between 2015 and 2019.

Most pedestrians were crossing in a crosswalk at an intersection, but many were crossing not in a crosswalk. The top violation category for pedestrian collisions was pedestrian violation (44% of all pedestrian collisions). This category includes violations such as pedestrians failing to yield right of way to vehicles at areas without a marked crosswalk, crossing without a crosswalk at the mid-block of two adjacent signals, and walking on the wrong side of the road when no pedestrian facilities are provided outside of a business or residence district.

Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 20
Figure 14 Pedestrian Location at Time of Collision
As seen in the collision density map (Figure 15), areas with high densities of pedestrian collisions include West Street at 11th Street, E Cypress Avenue near Beverly Drive, and Churn Creek Road at Hartnell Avenue.

Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 21
Figure 15 Density of Pedestrian Collisions

4.2.3.2 Distracted Driving
Distracted driving is categorized in collision data as inattention. Categories for inattention include cell phones (handheld or hands-free), electronic equipment, smoking, eating, children, animal, personal hygiene, and reading.

There were fourteen collisions due to distracted driving on City roadways between 2015 and 2019. This is one percent (1%) of all collisions on City roadways. Most of these collisions were rear end collisions and no distracted driving collisions resulted in fatal or severe injury. Figure 16 presents a breakdown of the types of inattention for the fourteen distracted driving collisions.

Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 22
Figure 16 Type of Inattention for Distracted Driving Collisions

4.2.3.3 Bicyclists
There was a total of one hundred and twenty-two (122) bicycle collisions for City roadways. The top violation categories for bicycle-related collisions, along with collision severity, are shown in Figure 17.

There were three (3) fatal and fifteen (15) severe injury collisions with bicyclists involved between 2015 and 2019. The primary collision type for bicycle collisions is broadside collisions. The top violation category for bicycle collisions was travelling on the wrong side of the road (34% of all bicycle collisions).

Figure 17 Top Violation Categories for Bicycle-Related Collisions As seen in the collision density map (Figure 18), areas with high densities of bicycle collisions include Hilltop Road at Browning Street and Bechelli Lane near Markwood Drive.

Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 23
Figure 18 Density of Bicycle Collisions

4.2.3.4 Intersections
One-thousand three-hundred and twenty (1320) collisions in the City of Redding between 2015 and 2019 were at intersections. This is fifty-six percent (56%) of all collisions on City roadways. As seen in Figure 19, the majority of these collisions were due to an unsafe speed violation, resulting in a rear end collision.

Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 24
Figure 19 Top Violation Categories for Intersection-Related Collisions

4.2.3.5 Impaired Driving
Seventeen percent (17%) of all City collisions between 2015 and 2019 were due to driving or biking under the influence of drugs or alcohol (DUI/BUI). Fifty-five percent of these collisions occurred during the weekend (Friday through Saturday). As shown in Figure 20, the top collision type due to DUI/BUI collisions is hit object.

Figure 20 Collision Types for DUI/BUI Collisions
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 25

5. PUBLIC OUTREACH

5.1 Public Website
A project website was created on the Social Pinpoint platform to inform the public about the LRSP and provide a platform for input. Figure 21 displays the homepage for the website found at lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/redding. The project website had Google Translate enabled that was able to translate the webpage in over 100 languages and detect the user’s browsers settings to automatically display the website in their language preference. In addition, the user could toggle the preferred language on the upper right corner of the webpage. Visitors to the page were invited to provide comments on an interactive project map and share their thoughts through a project survey. Comments from the interactive map and detailed results from the survey are included in Appendix B: Stakeholder and Public Input.

Figure 21 Public Website Home Page
Interactive Map
The interactive map feature on the website allowed the public to drag icons to a location within the City and leave a comment regarding driving, pedestrian, or bicycle suggestions at that location. Figure 22 Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 26
shows the interactive map feature from the website. Forty-four (44) comments were recorded as of June 23, 2021. Some of the public comments collected from the interactive map are as follows:
• Adding multi-use paths at various locations throughout the City o Oasis Road near Midland Drive
o Old Oregon Trail near Old 44 Drive
o Connecting Magnolia neighborhood to Airpark Drive and Gold Street o Along ACID canal
o S Bonnyview Road near S Market Street
o Buenaventura Boulevard between Placer Road and Starlight Boulevard • Improving quality/maintenance of bicycle facilities
o Placer Street near Buenaventura Street
o Near Juniper School
o Along bridge on E Cypress Avenue
o On western end of S Bonnyview Road
• Congestion at intersections
o Hartnell Avenue at Alta Mesa Drive
o E Cypress Avenue at I-5 Ramps
o Old Alturas Road at Victor Avenue
• Safety of pedestrian crossings
o Crossing Buenaventura Boulevard near Lakeside Drive

Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 27
Figure 22 Public Website Interactive Map
Public Survey
The City of Redding Public Survey asked eight questions relating to the LRSP. As of June 23, 2021, the survey received 12 responses. According to the survey, the primary safety issue for Redding is a lack of infrastructure (see Figure 23 for a graph with the responses).

Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 28
Figure 23 Public-Identified Roadway Issues
When asked about level of comfort with bicycling, three responses were “Enthused and Confident” and nine were “Interested but Concerned”. The majority of responses indicated they were were most comfortable with bicycling on a shared use path (see Figure 24).

Figure 24 Responses to “Which of the following bikeways would you feel comfortable using?” Additionally, three of twelve of responses were unfamiliar with ATP projects, four of twelve of responses were unfamiliar with HSIP planned projects, and two of twelve were interested in learning more about the ATP and HSIP projects. Some roadway issues identified through the survey are listed below. • Safety of crosswalks near Shasta Regional
o Suggestion to add a lighting system
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 29
• Speeding on Grandview Avenue
• High speed limits
• Signal timing downtown
• Safety for bicyclists at Shasta View Drive and Hartnell Avenue • Crossing Buenaventura Avenue at Lakeside Drive
Figure 25 shows the responses to the question “Would you be willing to use alternate modes of travel (walking, biking, public transit, etc.) to get to work, school, shopping, etc.?”. The majority of responses were “Maybe”. Some improvements that responses suggested to encourage increased use of alternate modes of travel include:
• Improved maintenance of roadways (fixing pot holes, cracking, etc.) • Improved transit schedules from Anderson to Redding
• Adding new bicycle facilities, specifically shared use paths • Improved travel times
• Improve and maintain bike lanes
• Less speeding, distracted driving, and impaired driving Figure 25 Responses to “Would you be willing to use alternate modes of travel (walking, biking, public transit, etc.) to get to work, school, shopping, etc.?” Some additional suggestions collected by the survey are summarized below.

Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 30
• Develop bicycle facilities to connect Redding to nearby communities • Connect the Girvan neighborhood to downtown with bike paths • Resurface roadways to increase bicycle comfort
• Additional pedestrian crossings and bike paths
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 31

6. IDENTIFY STRATEGIES
Through coordination and feedback from the City of Redding, LRSP stakeholder working group, and public outreach, safety projects and strategies were identified for the Local Road Safety Plan.

The LRSP will reference specific location engineering projects and systemic safety applications. In addition, safety strategies and projects that address the other E’s to include Enforcement, Education, Emergency Response, and Emerging Technologies will be discussed below.

6.1 Engineering Strategies
Locations to implement engineering strategies were determined through collision analysis and relative severity, public comments, recent safety improvements, and City feedback and recommendations.

Countermeasures were proposed for signalized intersections, two-way stop-controlled intersections, and roadway segments for roadways under City of Redding jurisdiction.

City Intersection Projects
Per the HSIP program, engineering countermeasures are available for grant funding. Per the most recent HSIP Cycle (Cycle 10) the approved countermeasures and crash reduction benefits were quantified in the HSIP analyzer. The recommended countermeasures for the intersections with the highest Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) rankings are presented in Appendix D: Recommended Projects. Since the next HSIP Cycle 11 is in 2022, further safety analysis should be conducted at that time in refining the collision data and subsequent safety projects and Benefit to Cost Ratios (BCRs).

Countermeasures were evaluated and prioritized based on benefit to cost ratios as prescribed in Caltrans most recent Local Road Safety Manual (LRSM). Refer to Appendix D: Recommended Projects for the list of countermeasures from Caltrans LRSM. The benefit value of a crash is the expected reduction in crashes with the countermeasure and the associated costs with the crash. Caltrans has opted to use 5 years of observed crashes in estimating future expected crashes. A benefit in reduction of cost can include benefits derived from savings of societal cost (emergency response, medical cost, and property damage). Cost associated with a project is based on planning level estimates of construction cost, planning and environmental cost and costs associated with right-of-way and utilities.

The locations of the priority signalized intersections and their corresponding crash rates are listed in Table 5 below.

Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 32
Table 5 Priority Intersections and Crash Rates
Some proposed countermeasures at City signalized intersections are shown below.

The City currently has advance dilemma zone detection on many high-speed roadways approaches.

Some additional countermeasures to consider for signalized intersections are ADA improvements, installing bicycle boxes, and installing guide marks through the intersection for left turns.

Additionally, there were seven (7) two-way stop-controlled intersections that had fatalities in the past five years. Some potential systemic countermeasures for these intersections could include a change of traffic control (multiway stop (if warrants are met) or roundabout), improved signage and pavement markings, and bicycle and pedestrian enhancements. The two-way stop-controlled intersections with fatalities are listed below.

Intersection
Crash Rate
(crashes/million
entering vehicles)*
Average Crash
Rate for Similar
Facility**
Churn Creek Rd / Hartnell Ave 0.4265 0.24
South St / California St - 0.24
Hartnell Ave / Bechelli Ln 0.1613 0.24
Airport Rd / Preserve Blvd 0.1809 0.24
Butte St / Continental St 0.2300 0.24
Market St / Riverside Dr - 0.20
Hartnell Ave / Northwoods Way 0.0363 0.24
Churn Creek Rd / E Cypress Ave 0.4752 0.24
Victor Ave / Hartnell Ave 0.3742 0.24
Hilltop Dr / E Cypress Ave 0.3174 0.24
E Cypress Ave / Bechelli Ln 0.2977 0.24
** California statewide average crash rate from "2018 Crash Data on California State Highways", Caltrans, 2020.
* Rates highlighted in bold are higher than average crash rates for similar facilities
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 33
• Hartnell Ave / Shotwick Trail
• Buenaventura Blvd / Lakeside Dr
• Hartnell Ave / Middleton Ln
• Old Eureka Way / Walnut Ave
• Mountain Lakes Blvd / Beltline Rd
• Delta St / Santa Fe Ave
• Placer St / Railroad Ave
City Segment Analysis
Throughout the analysis period, there were 1044 collisions reported on City of Redding roadway segments (non-intersection related). A breakdown of roadway collisions on City streets are included in Appendix A: Collision Data. The priority segments that were determined through data analysis and stakeholder coordination and their corresponding crash rates are listed in Table 6 below.

Table 6 Priority Segments and Crash Rates
Proposed mitigation measures for roadway segments are shown below. Detailed countermeasures for each priority segment are shown in Appendix D: Recommended Projects.

Segment Facility Type
Crash Rate
(crashes/million
vehicle miles)*
Average Crash
Rate for Similar
Facility**
CHURN CREEK RD from PRESIDIO ST to S BONNYVIEW RD 4-lane undivided 0.5375 0.8072 E CYPRESS AVE from PARK MARINA DR to CHURN CREEK RD 6-lane undivided 0.7648 0.8072 HILLTOP DR from N/O BROWNING ST to MARAGLIA ST 4-lane undivided 0.4676 0.8072 BECHELLI LN from E CYPRESS AVE to N/O 3RD ST 4-lane undivided 1.5918 0.8072 W CYPRESS AVE from MARKET ST to PARK MARINA DR 6-lane divided 0.5404 0.8141 RAILROAD AVE from SOUTH ST to BUENAVENTURA BLVD 2-lane undivided 0.3758 1.7391 HARTNELL AVE from GOODWATER AVE to AIRPORT RD 2-lane undivided - 1.7391 HILLTOP DR from N/O REDDING HILLTOP APARTMENT to ST THOMAS PKWY 4-lane undivided 0.6606 0.8072 HARTNELL AVE from NORTHWOODS WAY to KENCO AVE 4-lane undivided 0.9143 0.8072 S BONNYVIEW RD from S MARKET ST to CHURN CREEK RD 4-lane divided 0.2157 0.8141 * Rates highlighted in bold are higher than average crash rates for similar facilities ** Shasta County average crash rate from "2018 Crash Data on California State Highways", Caltrans, 2020.

Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 34
Speed Mitigation

6.1.3.1 Traffic Calming
The collision analysis from the past five years indicated that the top violation category for the City of Redding was unsafe speed. The stakeholder working group meetings and public website also gathered many comments related to speeding concerns. One way to help mitigate speed is to implement traffic calming measures. Some examples of traffic calming devices that can be used in the City of Redding to mitigate speed at areas of concern are shown below.

Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 35

The City of Redding has a Traffic Calming Program in place where residents can apply for a speed table to be implemented in their neighborhood. This program is neighborhood driven and requires support from 67% of the affected residents for installation of the speed table(s).

6.1.3.2 Assembly Bill No. 43
Assembly Bill (AB 43) was signed into law by Governor Newsom on October 8, 2021. This bill will change several aspects of speed setting and enforcement in California with a goal to make roadways safer for all road users. The new law is set to go into effect by June 30, 2024 and allows agencies more flexibility with keeping the previous speed limit, allows business and residential districts to have 15 and 20 mph speed limits, and allows the agency to round down the proposed speed limit based on an engineering study due to a high presence of bicycles or pedestrians.

Systemic Safety Countermeasures
When selecting countermeasures, just focusing on locations with a current collision issues is a reactive approach to roadway safety planning. A reactive approach targets recent hot-spots and specific problems that are associated with these locations; as a result of this approach, locations with low traffic volumes but with similar safety issues as hot spot locations are not addressed. In order to mitigate collisions in a both a reactive and proactive approach, Caltrans’ Local Road Safety Manual suggests agencies utilize a comprehensive approach that includes systemic and hot spot location improvements in developing a safety plan.

Some systemic safety countermeasure options, per the LRSM, at signalized intersections and segments for the current high-risk roadway characteristics are shown in Table 7. These systemic countermeasures Chicanes (create an S-shaped travel way for
Speed Tables vehicles)
Traffic Circles Partial Road Closure
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 36
could be added to a series of signalized intersections and segments through our recommendation or City coordination. Some additional systemic countermeasures for bicycle and pedestrian improvements can include leading pedestrian intervals and accessible pedestrian push buttons (APS) and/or pedestrian countdown signals, green conflict markings for bike lanes, and enhanced crossings (e.g. high visibility crosswalks, median refuge areas, rectangular rapid flashing beacons at midblock locations, and pedestrian hybrid beacons (must met CA MUTCD warrants).

Table 7 Recommended Systemic Safety Countermeasures
For HSIP funding, the goal will be to balance the need to have a competitive BCR (i.e. last call minimum BCR was 3.5 but funding was awarded for a minimum BCR closer to 12) and maximizing as many locations as possible that can benefit from similar safety countermeasures. However, HSIP does have set asides that require no BCR and therefore a systemic approach of these projects can be identified as long they meet the funding requirement (e.g. HSIP Cycle 10 had set aside funding were as follows: $250K per agency available for pedestrian crossing enhancements, $1M per agency for guardrail upgrades, and $250K per agency for installing edgelines).

6.1.4.1 Leading Pedestrian Intervals
One potential systemic project for signalized intersections is installing leading pedestrian intervals for pedestrian and bicycle crossings. This countermeasure benefits both pedestrians and bicyclists by allowing them to enter intersections a few seconds earlier than vehicles. According to the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), this has been proven to reduce vehicle-pedestrian collisions by 60% and increase visibility for pedestrians and bicyclists when entering the intersection.

Redding currently has leading pedestrian intervals at the following six signalized intersections:
• Lake Boulevard and Tamarack Drive
• Lake Boulevard and Clay Street
• Lake Boulevard and Masonic Avenue
• Court Street at Tehama Street
• Placer Street at East Street
• Hartnell Avenue at Parkview Avenue
The City compiled a list of locations that could benefit from this countermeasure. The specific locations for the recommended leading pedestrian intervals are shown in Figure 26. If all 49 locations are compiled into a systemic HSIP application, the estimated benefit-to-cost ratio will be approximately 57. Additional collision data for these locations is in Appendix D: Recommended Projects.

Location
Countermeasure
Number
CRF
Recommended Countermeasures
S02 15% Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
S03 15% Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Segments R26 30% Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs Signalized Intersections
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n n
n
n
n
n
n
n n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
nn
n
n
n
n
n
n
8 1
7 9
6 5
4 3
2 45
41 40
24 23
20 13
22 31
21 25
18 19
16 17
15 37
36 35
38 39
43 44
34 42
49 33
32 30
29 28
27 26
48 12
11 10
14 46
47 FIGURE 26
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
Miles
Project No.

Revision No. -
11215289
Date 08/03/2021

CITY OF REDDING

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
Map Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Horizontal Datum: WGS 1984
Grid: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Paper Size ANSI B
o Data source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2015-2019, Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community. Created by: edarke N:\US\San Luis Obispo\Projects\561\11215289\GIS\Maps\Working\LPI Locations.mxd Print date: 04 Aug 2021 - 07:58
Legend
Location for
Proposed
Leading
Pedestrian
Interval
n School
City of Redding
City Limit

LOCATIONS FOR PROPOSED

LEADING PEDESTRIAN INTERVAL

PROJECT

CITY OF

REDDING
ID Primary Road Secondary Road
1 Lake Blvd Hiatt Dr
2 Lake Blvd Oasis Rd
3 Lake Blvd Tamarack Dr
4 Lake Blvd Clay St
5 Lake Blvd North Point Dr
6 Lake Blvd Masonic Ave
7 Hilltop Dr Peppertree Ln
8 Placer St Pleasant St
9 Court St Tehama St
10 Court St Shasta St
11 Court St Placer St
12 Court St South St
13 Placer St Airpark Dr
14 Buenaventura Blvd Placer St
15 Butte St Continental St
16 Placer St Continental St
17 Placer St East St
18 Cypress Ave Civic Center Dr
19 Athens Ave Locust St
20 Hartnell Ave Cobblestone
21 Hartnell Ave Parkview Ave
22 Hartnell Ave Bechelli Ln
23 Bechelli Ln Blue Shield
24 S Bonnyview Rd Fire Hall 4
25 E Cypress Ave Alfreda Way
26 Churn Creek Rd Old Alturas Rd
27 Churn Creek Rd Presidio St
28 Churn Creek Rd Mistletoe Ln
29 Churn Creek Rd Industrial St
30 Churn Creek Rd Merchant St
31 Hartnell Ave Northw oods Way
32 Churn Creek Rd Shirley Ln
33 Churn Creek Rd Loma Vista Dr
34 Shasta View Dr Hartnell Ave
35 Dana Dr Victor Ave
36 Dana Dr Bradford Way
37 Victor Ave E Cypress Ave
38 Old Alturas Rd Friendly Rd
39 Airport Rd Knighton Rd
40 Shasta View Dr Hemingw ay St
41 Shasta View Dr Tarmac Rd
42 Old Oregon Trl Old 44 Dr
43 Airport Rd Rancho Rd
44 Airport Rd Preserve Blvd
45 Airport Rd Shasta View Dr
46 Market St Riverside Dr
47 Lake Blvd Hilltop Dr
48 Hilltop Dr Brow ning St
49 Churn Creek Rd S Bonnyview Rd
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 38
Projects Suggested through Public Input
The interactive map tool on the public website for the plan gathered many suggestions from residents of the City for areas of improvement. These suggestions were summarized and are shown in Table 8 below.

Table 8 Projects Suggested through Public Input
Additional Safety Projects
A comprehensive approach to selecting countermeasure recognizes that not all safety issues can be addressed through infrastructure improvement. The comprehensive approach to safety involves the ‘5 E’s of traffic safety. Besides engineering safety countermeasures, it is important to recommend safety countermeasures to coincide with the other safety E’s.

Location Suggestion
E Cypress Ave bridge Restripe pavement markings
E Cypress Ave bridge
Placer St near Buenaventura Blvd
S Bonnyview Rd between S Market St and Sacramento River Old Oregon Trail between Viking Way and SR 44
Parallel to Almond Ave between Shasta St and Placer St
Parallel to Buenaventura Blvd along goat path between Placer St and Starlight neighborhood
Along ACID Canal between Radio Ln and N Bonnyview Rd
S Bonnyview Rd between S Market St and Sacramento River Old Oregon Trail, north of Akrich St
North side of Old Alturas Rd from Shasta View Dr to Browning St Buenaventura Blvd at Lakeside Dr Install enhanced pedestrian crossing Ellis St near Juniper School Improve K rail maintenance and appearance
Cedars Rd Continue bike lanes on S Bonnyview
Shasta St at Olive Ave Educate public about traffic circles Lake Blvd at Keswick Dam Rd Evaluate installation of traffic signal Shasta View Dr near Alden Ave
Benton Dr near Delta St
Benton Dr near Delta St
Old Alturas Bridge
Shasta View Dr from SR 44 and Hartnell Ave
Victor Ave from SR 44 and Cypress Ave
Rancho Rd
Churn Creek Rd from I-5 to Victor Ave
Churn Creek Rd at Rancho Rd Evaluate visibility and speed countermeasures
Goodwater Ave
Freeman Way
Freebridge St at Smile Pl
Tehama St at Oregon St
Eureka Way at Almond Ave Install safety lighting
California St at Gold St Evaluate left turn movements
Market St at Gold St Evaluate right turn movements
Old Alturas Rd at Victor Ave Evaluate installation of roundabout Evaluate installation of stop signs
Evaluate traffic calming measures
Install multiuse path
Sweep/maintain bike lanes
Install sidewalk
Install bike lanes
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 39

6.2 Non-Engineering Strategies
Education
Education strategies are listed below.
• Campaign to prevent distracted driving and walking
• Safe route to school maps and outreach at schools
• Social media blasts with quick education tool for all users • Partner with existing agencies for public education campaigns Emerging Technologies
Possible emerging technologies strategies are listed below. • ITS infrastructure, web/mobile application (apps) and smart cities practices • Crash warning system
• Communication with traffic signals
• Changeable message signs
• Automatic bicycle/pedestrian counters
• Improving signal operation
o This helps increase traffic flow and can help with safety by decreasing delay, greenhouse gas emissions, crashes, etc.

Enforcement
Enforcement strategies are listed below.
• Targeted speed enforcement
o Focus on areas of concern for residents based on public feedback • DUI saturation patrols
• Increasing number of traffic enforcement officers
• Distracted driving enforcement
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 40
Emergency Response
Emergency response strategies are suggested below.
• Emergency signal installation
• Ability to administer life saving measures on-site of a collision • Emergency vehicle pre-emption at signalized intersections • Improvements to roadways to increase access and potentially shorten response times Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 41

7. PRIORITIZE & INCORPORATE STRATEGIES
In evaluating how to implement safety projects, prioritized lists of projects are shown in the tables below.

The City of Redding can look for opportunities to incorporate safety enhancements with the Capital Improvement Program. However, it is noted that funding is very limited and typically used from roadway paving. Additional funding opportunities can come through grant funding to include HSIP, ATP, and CMAQ.

Table 9 contains a prioritized list of the proposed intersection projects on City roadways based on their respective benefits. Table 10 shows a prioritized list of the proposed segment projects for City roadway segments based on expected benefits. The lowest fundable Benefit-to-Cost ratio for HSIP Cycle 10 was

12. To help show the competitiveness of the proposed projects, the tables also display the maximum project cost for a benefit-to-cost ratio of 10.

Low-cost, systemic countermeasures are preferred by Caltrans in the HSIP process.

Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 42
Table 9 Priority of City Intersection Projects
Intersection Recommended Countermeasures
Max Project Cost
for B/C Ratio of 10
Total Expected
Benefit
Total Estimated
Project Cost**HSIP Funding
Reimbursement
Ratio*
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Systemic (49
locations****) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) $2,075,100 $ 20,751,000 $$ 100% Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Install left-turn lane and add turn phase in westbound direction Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) - - - - Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection
Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) - - - - Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Increase DUI enforcement
Consolidate driveways
Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection
Install advance stop bar before crosswalk (Bicycle Box) Bicycle education about riding at night and rules of the road - - - - Butte St / Continental
St None (upcoming safety project addresses current collision trends) - - - - Market St / Riverside
Dr Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.) $ 159,000 $ 1,590,000 $ 100% Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Install raised pavement markers and striping (Through Intersection) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation) Improve signal hardware: lenses, back-plates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number $ 47,700 $ 477,001 $ 100%
Increase DUI enforcement - - - -
* Improve signal timing (coordination, phases, red, yellow, or operation); HSIP Funding Eligibility: 50% Install left-turn lane and add turn phase (signal has no left-turn lane or phase before); HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches; HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% ** $ = Estimated cost below $250,000
$$ = Estimated cost around $250,000 to $1,000,000
$$$ = Estimated cost above $1,000,000
***Locations for systemic mitigations: Churn Creek Rd/Hartnell Ave, South St/California St, Hartnell Ave/Bechelli Ln, Airport Rd/Preserve Blvd, Hartnell Ave/Northwoods Way, Churn Creek Rd/E Cypress Ave, Victor Ave/Hartnell Ave, Hilltop Dr/E Cypress Ave, E Cypress Ave/Bechelli Ln ****See Figure 26 for proposed locations
- -
Churn Creek Rd /
Hartnell Ave
$ 302,756 $ 3,027,557 $ 50%
-
Hartnell Ave / Bechelli
Ln
$ 403,061 $ 4,030,610 $$ 90%
South St / California St $ 522,218 $ 5,222,178
Systemic (9
locations***) $1,584,138 $ 15,841,375 $$ 50%
Victor Ave / Hartnell
Ave $ 215,421
Hartnell Ave /
Northwoods Way
Churn Creek Rd / E
Cypress Ave $ 211,949 $ 2,119,490 $
Airport Rd / Preserve
Blvd
$ 203,324 $ 2,033,242 $$
$ 2,154,205 $
E Cypress Ave /
Bechelli Ln $ 63,192 $ 631,924 $ 50%
Hilltop Dr / E Cypress
Ave $ 117,166 $ 1,171,664 $ 50%
$ 90%
50%
100%
50%
-
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 43
Table 10 Priority of City Segment Projects
Segment Recommended Countermeasures
Max Project Cost
for B/C Ratio of 10
Total Expected
Benefit
Total Estimated
Project Cost**HSIP Funding
Reimbursement
Ratio*
Add segment lighting (East of I-5 Interchange)
Install raised median (Between Hilltop Dr and Churn Creek Rd) Install bike lanes/Install separated bike lanes
Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points - - - - Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways - - - - Install raised median (Between Dana Dr and Browning Dr) Install edge-lines and centerlines (between Ross/Big-Lots Driveway and Margalia St) Install delineators, reflectors and/or object markers
Pedestrian fencing along sidewalk to guide pedestrians to the enhanced crosswalk with

RRFB - - - -
Install chevron signs on horizontal curves
Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway) Install delineators, reflectors, and/or object markers
Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs
Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
Install multiuse path/ sharrow on eastbound approach to the intersection of W Cypress Ave/ Market St
Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs $ 910,518 $ 9,105,180 $ 100% Install bike conflict paint at intersections and driveways - - - - Add Segment Lighting
Install curve advance warning signs
Increase DUI enforcement - - - -
Add Segment Lighting
Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes from 4 to 3 and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes) Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing at uncontrolled locations (with enhanced safety features)
Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points - - - - Install raised median (on the approaches to Hartnell Ave) $ 620,150 $ 6,201,500 $ 90% Consolidate existing driveways to limit the number of access points - - - - Railroad Ave (South St
to Buenaventura Blvd) Install dynamic/variable speed warning signs $ 431,490 $ 4,314,901 $ 100% S Bonnyview Rd (S
Market St to Churn
Creek Rd)
Install Separated Bike Lanes $ 53,622 $ 536,220 $$ 90%
* Install raised median; HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90%
Install bike lanes; HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90%
Install Separated Bike Lanes; HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% Road Diet (Reduce travel lanes from 4 to 3 and add a two way left-turn and bike lanes); HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% Install/upgrade pedestrian crossing (with enhanced safety features); HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% Install sidewalk/pathway (to avoid walking along roadway); HSIP Funding Eligibility: 90% ** $ = Estimated cost below $250,000
$$ = Estimated cost around $250,000 to $1,000,000
$$$ = Estimated cost above $1,000,000
Bechelli Ln (E Cypress
Ave to n/o 3rd St)
Railroad Ave (South St
to Buenaventura Blvd) $1,268,251 $ 12,682,508 $$$ 90%
- - - -
W Cypress Ave (Market
St to Park Marina Dr)
$ 902,440 $ 9,024,397 90%
Churn Creek Rd
(Presidio St to S
Bonnyview Rd)
Hilltop Dr (n/o
Browning St to
Maraglia St)
$1,763,889 $ 17,638,888 $$ 90%
90%
100%
E Cypress Ave (Park
Marina Dr to Churn
Creek Rd)
$2,271,687 $ 22,716,865
Hilltop Dr (n/o Redding
Hilltop Apartments to
St Thomas Pkwy)
$ 820,648 $ 8,206,483 $$$
Hartnell Ave
(Goodwater Ave to
Airport Rd)
$ 877,729 $ 8,777,285 $$
$$
$$$ 90%
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 44

8. EVALUATION PROCESS
To evaluate the success of this plan, yearly collision analysis, along with requests for public feedback, can take place and be compared to the established goals.

Goal: Reduce the potential for fatal and severe injury collisions citywide o Measure of Success: This can be achieved by smaller reductions of 1 fatal or severe injury (FSI) collision reduction per year.

Goal: Create a safe, livable, and welcoming community by developing a roadway safety plan targeted to Redding’s transportation and roadway safety needs o Measure of Success: If this goal is successful, residents will express an increased feeling of safety while using Redding’s transportation systems and the number and severity of collisions each year will decrease.

Goal: Improve safety around schools
o Measure of Success: Results of public feedback shows that there are areas where pedestrian access and safety can be improved around schools in the City of Redding. An evaluation of the improvements of multimodal transportation infrastructure around schools will capture effectiveness of this goal.

Goal: Reduce speeding collisions through engineering, enforcement, and education strategies o Measure of Success: A reduction in collisions with “Unsafe Speed” violations after implementing engineering, enforcement, and education strategies will determine if this goal is met.

Goal: Improve multimodal transportation safety by expanding the City’s non-motorized transportation infrastructure
o Measure of Success: Public feedback results show that there are areas where pedestrian and bicycle accessibility can be improved or installed. Improvements and installations of non-motorized transportation infrastructure will capture this goal.

Goal: Improve the health and vitality of our community by working with community safety partners to create a roadway safety plan targeted to Redding’s needs o Measure of Success: Community stakeholders will have increased participation in conversations about safety improvements in the City of Redding.

Goal: Reduce rear end collisions citywide by implementing speed management strategies Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 45
o Measure of Success: This goal will be effective if there is a decrease in “Unsafe Speed” collisions after implementing speed management strategies outlined in this plan.

Goal: Prioritize improvements that affect conditions/safety outcomes for identified disadvantaged populations
o Measure of Success: An increase in the projects implemented in disadvantaged populations would achieve this goal. See Figure 27 for the locations for recommended projects, in relation to the locations of low resource neighborhoods in Redding.

Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) ³
&
&
&
³ ³
³
³
³
& ³
& ³
³
& ³ ³ &
044D
140B
039E
114B
039B
114A
122B 122D
124B
039E
77 76
49 35
373 378
371
370
341
305
291
237 260
210
171
133
115 130
FIGURE 27
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
Miles
Project No.

Revision No. -
11215289
Date 05/05/2021

CITY OF REDDING

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)
Map Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Horizontal Datum: WGS 1984
Grid: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Paper Size ANSI B
o Data source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2015-2019, Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community. Created by: edarke N:\US\San Luis Obispo\Projects\561\11215289\GIS\Maps\Working\Disadvantaged Communities.mxd
Print date: 04 Aug 2021 - 08:01
Legend
³
Priority
Intersection
(Signalized)
&
Priority
Intersection
(Two-Way Stop
Controlled)
Priority
Segment
Low Resource
Neighborhood
City of Redding
City Limit

LOW RESOURCE NEIGHBORHOODS

AND PRIORITY LOCATIONS

IN REDDING

CITY OF

REDDING
SEGMENT_ID STREET FROM TO
039B HILLTOP DR N/O HILLTOP DR ST THOMAS PKWY
039E HILLTOP DR N/O BROWNING ST MARAGLIA ST
044D CHURN CREEK RD PRESIDIO ST DANA DR
114A W CYPRESS AVE MARKET ST PARK MARINA DR
114B E CYPRESS AVE PARK MARINA DR CHURN CREEK RD
122B HARTNELL AVE NORTHWOODS WAY KENCO AVE
122D HARTNELL AVE GOODWATER AVE AIRPORT RD
124B BECHELLI LN E CYPRESS AVE N/O 3RD ST
140B RAILROAD AVE SOUTH ST BUENAVENTURA BLVD
Intx_ID NS_Road EW_Road
35 Market St Riverside Dr
49 Mountain Lakes Blvd Beltline Rd
76 Delta St Santa Fe Ave
77 Buenaventura Blvd Lakeside Dr
115 Hilltop Dr E Cypress Ave
130 Churn Creek Rd E Cypress Ave
133 Churn Creek Rd Hartnell Ave
171 Airport Rd Preserve Blvd
210 Victor Ave Hartnell Ave
237 Old Eureka Way Walnut Ave
260 Butte St Continental St
291 Placer St Railroad Ave
305 South St California St
341 E Cypress Ave Bechelli Ln
370 Hartnell Ave Shotw ick Trl
371 Hartnell Ave Bechelli Ln
373 Hartnell Ave Northw oods Way
378 Hartnell Ave Middleton Ln
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 47

9. NEXT STEPS
The City of Redding plans to send the Local Road Safety Plan to City Council on February 15, 2022. This safety plan will be a living document and will guide the City’s roadway safety needs for the next five years.

It will be updated as needed and the goals will be monitored.

Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 48

10. REFERENCES
Recent/Upcoming Projects
• “Shasta County Projects”, Caltrans, District 2.
• “Oasis Road Specific Plan: Final Master Environmental Impact Report”, RBF Consulting, April 2006. • “Administrative Draft EIR: Traffic Impact Analysis”, City of Redding, Oasis Specific Plan. KimleyHorn and Associates, Inc., June 2005. • “Girvan Road Railroad Crossing Improvements and South Redding Bikeway and Pedestrian Trail Project”, Dokken Engineering, November 2020.
• “West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, May 2020.
• “Trinity Street Bikeway Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, November 2020. • “Shasta Street R.R. Crossing Improvements Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, June 2020.
• “Systemic Protected Left Turn Project”, Application Form for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 10. City of Redding, Public Works Department, October 2020. • “Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project”, Application Form for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 10. City of Redding, Public Works Department, October 2020. • “Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements”, Application Form for Cycle 9 Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). City of Redding, Public Works Department, August 2018. • “Airport Road Improvement Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, April 2019. • “Bechelli Lane & Loma Vista Active Transportation Corridor Improvements”, Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 3 Application Form. City of Redding, Public Works Department, June 2016. • “Hartnell Avenue Safety Improvement Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, March 2020.
• “Diestelhorst to Downtown Non-Motorized Improvement Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, June 2020.
• “Placer Street Improvements (ATP)”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, May 2016. • “Quartz Hill Road Improvements”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, January 2018. • “Churn Creek Rd & Maraglia St Safety Improvements Project”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, September 2020.
• “California Street Bikeway”, Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5 Application Form. City of Redding, Public Works Department, December 2018.
• “Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project”, Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5 Application Form. City of Redding, Public Works Department, July 2020. • “Victor Ave & E Cypress Ave Active Transportation Project”, Active Transportation Program (ATP) Cycle 5 Application Form. City of Redding, Public Works Department, July 2020.

Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 49
• Shasta Regional Transportation Agency, “SR-273 Multimodal Corridor Plan”, https://www.srta.ca.gov/353/SR-273-Multimodal-Corridor-Plan Traffic Data
• City of Redding Collision Data, Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System, 2015-2019. • City of Redding Collision Data, Transportation Injury Mapping System, 2015-2019. • “2018 Crash Data on California State Highways”, Caltrans, October 2020.

Manuals/Articles
• “Developing Safety Plans, A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners”, Federal Highway Administration, March 2012, http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/local_rural/training/fhwasa12017/. • 2020-2024 California’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), “California Safe Roads: 2020-2024 Strategic Highway Safety Plan”, Caltrans.
• “Local Roadway Safety, A Manual for California’s Local Road Owners”, Caltrans, Version 1.5, April 2020
• “Highway Safety Manual”, American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHTO), 1st Edition, 2014 supplement.
• “California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD)”, Revision 5, 2014. • “Designing for All Ages & Abilities: Contextual Guidance for High-Comfort Bicycle Facilities”, National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO), December 2017. • Geller, Rodger. “Four Types of Cyclists”, Portland Office of Transportation, 2009. • “2000-2020 General Plan”, City of Redding, Public Works Department, October 2000, https://www.cityofredding.org/home/showpublisheddocument?id=5513. • “California Statewide Collision Overview”, Caltrans, https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dotmedia/programs/safety-programs/documents/shsp/shsp-ca-datafactsheets_a11y.pdf. • “Local and Rural Road Safety Briefing Sheets: Local Road Safety Plans,” Federal Highway Administration, November 2014.
• “Systemic Safety Project Selection Tool,” Federal Highway Administration, 2013.

Websites
• California Department of Transportation, “Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP)”, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/safety-programs/shsp.
• California Department of Transportation, “Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) and Systemic Safety Analysis Report Program (SSARP)”, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/local-assistance/fed-and-stateprograms/highway-safety-improvement-program/local-roadway-safety-plans. • California Department of Transportation, “HSIP Cycle 10”, https://dot.ca.gov/programs/localassistance/fed-and-state-programs/highway-safety-improvement-program/apply-now.

Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Draft Document – For Discussion Only – Final Version May Differ From Draft GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 50
• City of Redding Local Road Safety Plan, https://lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/redding. • City of Redding, “Traffic Calming”,
https://www.cityofredding.org/home/showpublisheddocument/24813/637438934889970000. • National Association of City Transportation Officials, “Urban Street Design Guide”, https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/intersection-design-elements/trafficsignals/leading-pedestrian-interval/.

Surveys
• Local Road Safety Plan Project Survey, https://lrsp.mysocialpinpoint.com/redding.

Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) GHD | Redding Local Road Safety Plan | Page 51
Kathryn Kleinschmidt
[email protected]
805.305.5868
Emily Darke
[email protected]
916.865.5309
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Appendix A – Collision Data
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds)

COLLISIONS BY YEAR
By Severity
By Collision Type
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Collisions at Selected Intersections
Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
1 Lake Blvd Oasis Rd 1 1 2 1 21 1 2 1 19 2 42 Oasis Rd Vigil Ct 11 1 61 13 Oasis Rd Beltline Rd 11 1 61 14 Oasis Rd Daut Rd 11 1 30 1 15 Oasis Rd Oak Leaf Ln 1 11 30 1 16 Oasis Rd Sandstone Dr 11 1 10 17 Oasis Rd Twin View Blvd 2 3 1 1 41 3 2 1 41 5 68 Oasis Rd Old Oregon Trl 1 2 1 1 21 1 11 1 24 3 49 Old Oregon Trl Paso Robles Ave 1 1 2 11 17 2 2 10 Old Oregon Trl Frontier Rd 11 1 30 1 111 Lake Blvd Wilmington Way 1 11 1 61 112 Lake Blvd Keswick Dam Rd 1 3 3 151 11 2 3 32 4 713 Lake Blvd Magnums Way 11 1 30 1 114 Lake Blvd Santa Rosa Way 11 1 1 1 1 1 17 2 215 Lake Blvd Tamarack Dr 3 1 11 1 11 1 33 3 316 Lake Blvd St Nicholas Ave 2 2 31 111 1 1 34 4 417 Lake Blvd St Mark St 11 1 10 118 Lake Blvd Clay St 1 3 13 121 29 4 419 Lake Blvd North Point Dr 11 3 1 13 112 1 1 59 5 520 Lake Blvd Masonic Ave 1 6 1 1 331 2321 2 48 7 821 Lake Blvd N Market St 2 2 4 1 34 2222 38 4 822 Lake Blvd Hilltop Dr 12 4 1 132 1 11123 1 77 7 823 Lake Blvd Erickson Way 2 11 11 1 22 2 224 Lake Blvd Black Marble Way 2 3 1 51 11 2 2 41 5 625 Lake Blvd Churn Creek Rd 11 1 10 126 Twin View Blvd Oasis Ct 11 1 61 127 Twin View Blvd Caterpillar Rd 11 2 2 12 1 228 Twin View Blvd Midway Dr 11 1 61 129 Twin View Blvd N Market St 1 2 3 12 23 3 330 North Point Dr Redwood Blvd 11 1 10 131 N Market St Caterpillar Rd 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 232 N Market St Benton Dr 2 2 4 5 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 5 38 4 833 N Market St Arboretum Dr 11 1 61 134 N Market St Quartz Hill Rd 2 2 11 12 2 235 Market St Riverside Dr 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 551 2 336 Market St Trinity St 12 1 1 3 2 1 112 1 59 4 537 Market St Eureka Way 2 21 2 31 14 2 438 Market St Shasta St 1 3 121 13 14 1 439 Market St Tehama St 1 1 4 114 32 1 21 2 640 Market St Placer St 11 1 61 141 Market St South St 2 2 1 1 12 1 31 1 35 4 542 Market St Lincoln St 11 1 10 143 S Market St California St 1 21 1 1 1 2 1 81 3 Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
44 S Market St Fell St 11 1 61 145 S Market St Grange St 11 1 61 146 S Market St Sutter St 11 1 10 147 S Market St Wyndham Ln 1 1 11 111 17 2 248 S Market St S Bonnyview Rd 3 11 1 1 2 30 349 Mountain Lakes Blvd Beltline Rd 11 1 544 1 150 Mountain Lakes Blvd Charles Dr 1 1 11 11 1 151 White River Dr Beltline Rd 11 1 10 152 White River Dr Jaxon Way 11 1 10 153 Wright Dr Mountain Shadows Blvd 1 11 1 11 1 154 Mountain Shadows Blvd Alder St 11 1 10 155 Midway Dr Ridge Rd 11 1 10 156 Boulder Creek Dr Boulder Creek Ct 11 1 10 157 Black Marble Way Boulder Dr 21 1 1 1 20 258 Boulder Dr Rhyonite Dr 11 1 10 159 Redwood Blvd Butternut Ln 11 2 1 1 12 1 260 Ridgewood Rd Rugby Hill Dr 11 1 10 161 Collyer Dr Hawley Rd 11 1 61 162 Collyer Dr Ridgewood Rd 1 1 1 1 11 71 263 Country Oak Dr Mica Ct 11 1 10 164 College View Dr Churn Creek Rd 1 1 1 12 3 18 2 365 College View Dr Tidmore Ln 11 1 11 1 166 College View Dr Shasta View Dr 1 3 1 3 1111 91 467 Quartz Hill Rd River Ridge Dr 11 1 1 2 71 268 Quartz Hill Rd Mount Bonnington Dr 11 1 61 169 Quartz Hill Rd Snow Ln 11 1 11 1 170 Quartz Hill Rd Benton Dr 1 3 111 1 111 1 91 471 Quartz Hill Rd Rio Dr 11 1 10 172 Snow Ln Lake Redding Dr 11 1 30 173 Benton Dr Delta St 11 1 10 174 Benton Dr Barbara Rd 11 1 10 175 Benton Dr Loma St 11 2 2 71 276 Delta St Santa Fe Ave 1 11 544 1 177 Buenaventura Blvd Lakeside Dr 1 1 1 1 11 550 2 278 Buenaventura Blvd Westgate Dr 11 1 61 179 Buenaventura Blvd Placer St 1 2 12 1 1 1 81 380 Buenaventura Blvd Teton Dr 11 1 10 181 Buenaventura Blvd Summit Dr 11 1 1 2 17 2 282 Buenaventura Blvd Railroad Ave 1 2 1 21 1 2 121 24 3 483 N Court St Middle Creek Rd 11 1 30 1 184 N Court St 11th St 1 1 11 11 71 285 Court St Euerka Way 2 1 3 12 13 2 386 Court St Shasta St 3 2 2 6 1 112 32 47 5 787 Court St Tehama St 3 2 3 1 5 2 2 214 1 48 5 888 Court St Butte St 22 2 20 2 Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
89 Court St Yuba St 1 11 1 1 2 71 290 Court St Placer St 12 6 1 221 2 213131 1 88 9 991 Court St Sacramento St 21 3 2 1 13 2 392 Court St South St 1 2 1 2 11 1 81 393 Court St Gold St 2 2 1 14 31 1 35 4 594 Court St Terrace St 111 3 3 18 2 395 Court St Sonoma St 1 11 1 61 196 Court St Schley Ave 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 297 Court St Rosealine Ave 1 1 1 1 1 11 71 298 Hilltop Dr Ridgecrest Trl 11 1 61 199 Hilltop Dr Peppertree Ln 2 11 1 1 20 2 100 Hilltop Dr Mercedes Ln 11 1 61 1101 Hilltop Dr St Thomas Pkwy 1 2 12 1 11 13 1 3102 Hilltop Dr Sandpoint Dr 11 1 10 1103 Hilltop Dr Palisades Ave 2 2 3 52 14 2 37 4 7104 Hilltop Dr I-5 11 1 61 1105 Hilltop Dr Browning St 1 4 5 4 1 8 3 11 1 2 3 2 4 2 3 108 10 14106 Hilltop Dr Rockaway Dr 11 2 11 71 2107 Hilltop Dr E Palisades Ave 11 1 61 1108 Hilltop Dr Dana Dr 11 1 5 1331 1 2 11 4 52 3 8109 Hilltop Dr Presidio St 1 2 1 1 3 12 1 24 3 4110 Hilltop Dr Mistletoe Ln 11 1 10 1111 Hilltop Dr Azalea Ave 11 1 11 1 1112 Hilltop Dr Industrial St 1 5 1221 11 3 2 60 6 6113 Hilltop Dr Commerce St 11 1 61 1114 Hilltop Dr Grove St 1 4 1 123 1 12 2 36 5 6115 Hilltop Dr E Cypress Ave 6 9 7 2 3 11 3 3 1 4 4 3 6 5 127 15 22116 Hilltop Dr Maraglia St 11 1 10 1117 Churn Creek Rd Golden Gate Trl 11 1 11 1 1118 Churn Creek Rd Palacio Dr 1 11 1 30 1 1119 Churn Creek Rd Bodenhamer Blvd 11 2 4 22 53 4 4120 Churn Creek Rd Whistling Dr 2 1 1 1111 2 2 29 3 4121 Churn Creek Rd Browning St 2 1 11 3 2 2 29 3 4122 Churn Creek Rd Lancers Ln 11 2 1 1 41 2 2123 Churn Creek Rd Old Alturas Rd 13 3 1 4 2 2 132 1 81 7 7124 Churn Creek Rd Dana Dr 5 7 7 2348 11346 5 104 12 19125 Churn Creek Rd Presidio St 4 2 1 2 2 11 1 2 1 1 1 1 26 4 6126 Churn Creek Rd Mistletoe Ln 1 5 2 224 132 3 43 6 8127 Churn Creek Rd Industrial St 2 11 1 1 20 2128 Churn Creek Rd Merchant St 1 5 2 152 1 1121 3 43 6 8129 Churn Creek Rd Wall St 4 1 1 22 311 25 4 5130 Churn Creek Rd E Cypress Ave 8 12 9 3 2 6 12 2 2 1 1 1 6 8 7 5 3 169 20 29131 Churn Creek Rd Maraglia St 12 2 1 1 3 23 3 3132 Churn Creek Rd Parsons Dr 2 2 1 1111 1 1 2 2 35 4 5133 Churn Creek Rd Hartnell Ave 2 3 15 12 1 2 21 4 1 2 1 2 1 8 5 5 9 5 1223 20 32 Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
134 Churn Creek Rd Bond St 1 11 1 1 1 71 2135 Churn Creek Rd Le Brun Ln 1 21 2 2 1 81 3136 Churn Creek Rd Del Sol Pl 2 1 21 1121 23 2 3137 Churn Creek Rd Shirley Ln 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2138 Churn Creek Rd Camino Ct 11 1 1 1 1 71 2139 Churn Creek Rd Echo Rd 4 211 12 1 40 4140 Churn Creek Rd Harpole Rd 2 11 1 1 2 2 1 13 2 3141 Churn Creek Rd De Moll Dr 1 11 1 1 1 71 2142 Churn Creek Rd Loma Vista Dr 3 2 122 211 1 20 3 5143 Churn Creek Rd Denton Way 1 1 11 11 1 1144 Churn Creek Rd Arizona St 11 1 61 1145 Churn Creek Rd Hillmonte Dr 11 1 10 1146 Churn Creek Rd S Bonnyview Rd 1 4 5 1342 11341 1 59 5 10147 Churn Creek Rd Hartmey Ln 11 1 10 1148 Churn Creek Rd Victor Ave 1 1 13 2 1 37 2 3149 Churn Creek Rd Rancho Rd 1 1 3 1 1 21 1 1 3 20 2 5150 Shasta View Dr Palacio Dr 1 11 11 1 1151 Shasta View Dr Inspiration Pl 3 3 11 1 30 3152 Shasta View Dr Old Alturas Rd 5 2 3 3 24 1 4131 1 70 7 10153 Shasta View Dr Atrium Way 1 2 11 1 11 111 23 3 3154 Shasta View Dr Viking Way 11 1 61 1155 Shasta View Dr Goodwater Ave 2 1 1 1 1 111 13 2 3156 Shasta View Dr Kerry Ave 2 2 11 20 2157 Shasta View Dr Christian Ave 11 2 1 1 17 2 2158 Shasta View Dr Wilson Ave 1 3 22 111 1 48 4 4159 Shasta View Dr Hawn Ave 1 1 1 2 1 1 11 37 2 3160 Shasta View Dr Hartnell Ave 1 1 4 1 22 231 21 2 6161 Shasta View Dr Alden Ave 1 1 11 1 1 71 2162 Shasta View Dr Leonard St 1 21 2 2 1 13 1 3163 Shasta View Dr Saturn Skwy 11 1 10 1164 Shasta View Dr Galaxy Way 11 1 61 1165 Shasta View Dr Western Oak Dr 1 11 1 11 1 1166 Shasta View Dr Rancho Rd 1 3 22 2 1 1 91 4167 Old Oregon Trl Viking Way 1 1 11 11 1 1168 Old Oregon Trl Old 44 Dr 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2169 Old Oregon Trl Airport Rd 12 3 1 2 23 3 3170 Old Oregon Trl Rancho Rd 11 1 11 1 1171 Airport Rd Preserve Blvd 1 1 1 1 22 121 1 562 3 4172 Airport Rd Rancho Rd 11 1 2 31 1 2173 Airport Rd Electro Way 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2174 Airport Rd Knighton Rd 3 1 121 111 1 19 3 4175 Airport Rd Meadow View Dr 1 2 1 2 1 21 23 3 3176 Airport Rd Fig Tree Ln 1 2 1 11 111 81 3177 Airport Rd Marvel Ln 11 1 30 1 1178 Airport Rd Skyway St 11 1 10 1 Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
179 Airport Rd Lassen View Ln 11 1 61 1180 Airport Rd Terry Ln 1 1 11 30 1 1181 Yolla Bolly Trl Chaos Walk 11 1 10 1182 Fountain Cir Olympic St 11 1 10 1183 Fountain Cir Richland Way 11 1 11 1 1184 Whistling Dr Springer Dr 1 1 11 1 1 71 2185 Bobwhite Way Grouse Dr 11 1 10 1186 Browning St Mission de Oro Dr 1 11 1 61 1187 Browning St Canby Rd 42 1 1 3 1 40 4188 Browning St Lancers Ln 1 2 12 1 1 1 13 1 3189 Browning St Friendly Rd 2 1 3 1 11 13 2 3190 Browning St Old Alturas Rd 11 1 10 1191 Old Alturas Rd Canby Rd 3 1 1 11 1 1 1 18 3 3192 Old Alturas Rd Friendly Rd 11 1 1 1 1 41 2 2193 Old Alturas Rd Bradford Way 15 2 1 7 412 1 97 8 8194 Old Alturas Rd Victor Ave 1 2 1 1 1 111 23 3 3195 Old Alturas Rd Arroyo Manor Dr 1 1 10 1196 Old Alturas Rd Lema Rd 1 1 1 12 1 1 1 18 2 3197 Old Alturas Rd Modoc Ln 1 11 11 1 1198 Dana Dr Mt Shasta Mall 2 2 1111 3 1 14 2 4199 Dana Dr Friendly Rd 1 1 1 12 1 1 1 37 2 3200 Dana Dr Bradford Way 21 1 1 1 20 2201 Dana Dr Victor Ave 11 1 61 1202 Victor Ave Victor Ave 11 1 61 1203 Victor Ave Aspin Ave 2 3 5 1111 1 15 2 5204 Victor Ave SR 44 WB Ramps 11 1 61 1205 Victor Ave SR 44 EB Ramps 11 1 10 1206 Victor Ave Mistletoe Ln 3 5 1 4 2 2121 2 23 3 8207 Victor Ave Derby Ln 11 1 11 1 1208 Victor Ave Cascade Ln 11 2 1 1 71 2209 Victor Ave E Cypress Ave 322 6 1 3 22 47 5 7210 Victor Ave Hartnell Ave 1 6 8 7 4 1 10 5 2 2 2 5 3 6 4 4 151 15 22211 Victor Ave Bramble Pl 3 11 1 11 1 30 3212 Victor Ave Marlene Ave 1 1 11 11 31 1 2213 Victor Ave Vega St 11 1 11 1 1214 Victor Ave Galaxy Way 1 1 1 4 1 1 2 1 21 2 2 3 51 3 7215 Victor Ave El Vista St 11 1 10 1216 Victor Ave Alta Saga Dr 11 1 61 1217 Sierra Vista Dr Hallmark Dr 11 1 10 1218 Sunset Dr Red Bud Dr 1 1 11 11 1 1219 Royal Oaks Dr Scenic Dr 11 1 10 1220 Overhill Dr Pioneer Dr 11 1 10 1221 Eureka Way Overhill Dr 1 1 11 1 1 71 2222 Euerka Way Whiskeytown Ct 1 11 61 1223 Eureka Way Almond Ave 11 1 61 1 Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
224 Eureka Way Walnut Ave 11 1 61 1225 Eureka Way Orange Ave 11 1 1 10 1226 Eureka Way Rose Ave 1 11 1 1 1 12 1 2227 Eureka Way West St 11 1 10 1228 Eureka Way California St 3 11 1 1 2 1 18 3 3229 Eureka Way Pine St 3 3 1 11 30 3230 Eureka Way Continental St 1 3 22 112 91 4231 West St 10th St 11 1 61 1232 West St 11th St 3 2 21 1 1 4 221 45 5 5233 Trinity St Center St 11 1 10 1234 Trinity St Pine St 2 11 1 1 20 2235 Foothill Blvd Las Animas Dr 11 1 10 1236 Monte Bello Dr Las Animas Dr 11 1 10 1237 Old Eureka Way Walnut Ave 1 1 1 1 11 545 1 2238 Monte Bello Dr Manzanita Hills Ave 11 1 10 1239 North St Olive Ave 11 1 10 1240 Shasta St Lombard Trl 1 11 1 11 1 1241 Shasta St Almond Ave 11 1 61 1242 Shasta St Olive Ave 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2243 Shasta St Orange Ave 1 2 2 1 1 11 1 23 3 3244 Shasta St Magnolia Ave 11 1 10 1245 Shasta St Willis St 1 21 1 1 1 2 81 3246 Shasta St West St 1 1 1 1 1 11 71 2247 Shasta St Oregon St 11 1 61 1248 Shasta St Center St 1 11 1 61 1249 Shasta St California St 1 2 111 11 1 81 3250 Shasta St Pine St 2 5 2 1 7 1 11 43 2 54 7 9251 Shasta St East St 3 4 321 1 1 214 22 3 7252 Auditorium Dr Sundial Bridge Dr 11 1 11 1 1253 Tehama St Oregon St 1 8 1 8 21 3 3 14 1 9254 Tehama St California St 1 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2255 Tehama St Pine St 14 5 1 461 5311 1 105 10 11256 Tehama St East St 5 1 213 1 222 31 5 6257 Butte St Magnolia Ave 11 1 10 1258 Butte St West St 2 1 1 11 20 2259 Butte St East St 1 2 2 21 2 2 1 12 1 44 3 5260 Butte St Continental St 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 12211 562 3 4261 Butte St Sequoia St 11 1 10 1262 Butte St Sundial Bridge Dr 11 1 10 1263 Park Marina Dr Athens Ave 1 2 21 2 1 81 3264 Park Marina Dr Olympus Ave 11 1 11 1 1265 Park Marina Dr South St 21 1 2 2 1 28 3 3266 Park Marina Dr Washington Ave 11 1 10 1267 Park Marina Dr Locust St 11 1 61 1268 Yuba St Railroad Ave 11 1 61 1 Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
269 Yuba St California St 11 1 10 1270 Yuba St Pine St 32 4 1 1 1 3 1 20 3 5271 Yuba St East St 1 11 1 61 1272 Yuba St Liberty St 1 11 1 61 1273 Tralee Ln Tralee Ln 11 1 10 1274 Oconnor Ave Wicklow Ct 11 1 10 1275 Oconnor Ave Nantucket Dr 11 1 10 1276 Mary Lake Dr Carlow Way 1 11 1 11 1 1277 Placer Rd Boston Ave 11 1 11 1 1278 Placer Rd Oconnor Ave 2 2 1 3 22 34 4 4279 Placer Rd Almaden Dr 11 1 11 1 1280 Placer St Cottonwood Ave 11 1 10 1281 Placer St Oak St 11 1 61 1282 Placer St Mesa St 1 11 61 1283 Placer St Walnut Ave 11 1 11 1 1284 Placer St Jay St 11 1 10 1285 Placer St Olive Ave 1 2 12 11 1 81 3286 Placer St Magnolia Ave 1 5 1 42 1 21 4 42 6 7287 Placer St Willis St 3 11 1 11 12 33 3 3288 Placer St Chesnut St 11 1 10 1289 Placer St West St 3 4 3 26 2 211422 1 60 7 10290 Placer St Oregon St 1 1 2 111 1 1 2 2 19 2 4291 Placer St Railroad Ave 1 11 1 544 1 1292 Placer St Center St 11 1 10 1293 Placer St California St 7 1123 13 3 70 7294 Placer St Pine St 2 7 10 3 2 5 8 1 1 3 4 5 5 2 74 9 19295 Placer St East St 1 4 6 4213 1 3141 2 41 5 11296 Placer St Continental St 11 1 1 2 2 41 2 2297 Pleasant St Yuba St 11 1 10 1298 Sacramento St Chesnut St 11 1 10 1299 California St Sacramento St 11 1 1 2 71 2300 Pine St Sacramento St 11 1 11 1 1301 Continental St Sacramento St 3 12 21 30 3302 Airpark Dr Gold St 11 1 10 1303 South St Oregon St 11 1 11 1 1304 South St Railroad Ave 11 1 61 1305 South St California St 1 1 5 3 161 2 212314 588 7 10306 South St Pine St 1 2 2 14 21 2 25 3 5307 South St East St 4 3 1 114 2 111112 3 63 7 8308 South St Garden Ave 1 11 10 1309 South St Canal Dr 11 1 30 1 1310 South St Athens Ave 11 1 1 1 1 12 1 2311 Florence St Garden Ave 11 1 61 1312 Florence St Sequoia St 11 1 10 1313 Gold St Waldon St 11 1 10 1 Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
314 Gold St California 11 1 10 1315 Gold St East St 1 1 11 1 1 71 2316 California St Sonoma St 2 11 1 1 20 2317 Pine St Lincoln St 11 1 11 1 1318 Pine St East St 2 11 2 20 2319 Pine St Cypress Ave 12 3 2 322 1 1 2121 2 72 6 8320 Athens Ave Locust St 4 1 22 4 1 1 3 4 52 5 7321 Azela Ave Iris Dr 11 1 10 1322 Mistletoe Ln Shasta Pines Way 11 1 61 1323 Mistletoe Ln Penn Dr 11 1 11 1 1324 Mistletoe Ln Shady Ln 11 1 10 1325 Mistletoe Ln Lindeena Ln 11 1 11 1 1326 Larkspur Ln Executive Way 1 11 10 1327 Larkspur Ln Industrial St 11 1 10 1328 Oxford Rd Yale Ct 11 1 10 1329 Marigold Way Dewberry Dr 11 1 10 1330 Tarmac Rd Tuscany Way 11 1 10 1331 Tarmac Rd Salzburg Trl 11 1 10 1332 Tarmac Rd Charade Way 11 1 1 1 2 41 2 2333 Tarmac Rd Abernathy Ln 11 1 10 1334 Cypress Ave Civic Center Dr 4 2 1211 1 1 1212 26 4 6335 Cypress Ave Athens Ave 12 3 2 1142 1121 2 3 72 6 8336 Park Marina Dr Athens Ave 1 2 11 1 1 11 1 81 3337 Cypress Ave Hartnell Ave 13 6 5 1841 1 12261 4 104 10 15338 E Cypress Ave Lowden Ln 11 1 10 1339 E Cypress Ave Beverly Dr 1 1 1 12 12 1 18 2 3340 E Cypress Ave Rosemary Ave 2 1 12 1 1 12 2 2341 E Cypress Ave Bechelli Ln 1 11 8 5 10 2 1 1 1 1 6 3 4 3 4 85 12 20342 E Cypress Ave I-5 1 1 11 61 1343 E Cypress Ave Larkspur Ln 2 2 2 32 1 2 23 1 36 4 6344 E Cypress Ave E Cypress Ave 1200 11 1 10 1345 E Cypress Ave Alfreda Way 121 3 1 1 3 1 24 3 4346 E Cypress Ave Irwin Rd 11 1 61 1347 E Cypress Ave Heather Ln 1 1 11 2 17 2 2348 E Cypress Ave Oxford Rd 11 2 1 1 1 17 2 2349 Parkview Ave Angelo Ave 11 1 10 1350 Parkview Ave Favretto Ave 1 4 11 3 3 211 1 35 5 5351 Parkview Ave Grape Ave 1 1 11 61 1352 Parkview Ave Akard Ave 12 3 1 22 1 122211 70 6 6353 Parkview Ave State St 11 1 10 1354 State St Leland Ave 11 1 11 1 1355 Fell St Favretto Ave 1 1 11 11 1 1356 Fell St Leland Ave 2 2 11 20 2357 Leland Ave Severtson Dr 11 1 10 1358 Teton Dr Allegheny Ct 11 1 10 1 Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
359 Auburn Dr Donnor Ct 1 11 1 11 1 1360 Court St Railroad Ave 11 2 1 1 17 2 2361 Railroad Ave Sheridan St 1 1 1 11 12 1 2362 Railroad Ave Eugenia Ave 11 1 11 1 1363 Railroad Ave Laurel Ave 11 1 61 1364 Larkspur Ln Maraglia Ave 1 11 11 1 1365 Yana Ave Carleton St 11 1 11 1 1366 East Way Vale dr 11 1 1 11 1 1367 King St Hawn Ave 11 1 10 1368 Goodwater Ave Wilson Ave 1 11 1 1 1 12 1 2369 Hartnell Ave Parkview Ave 1 1 1 1 1 1 12 1 18 2 3370 Hartnell Ave Shotwick Trl 1 1 1 1 2 11 1 551 2 3371 Hartnell Ave Bechelli Ln 1 2 3 3 1 2 4 1 12 1 3 1 2 3 587 6 9372 Hartnell Ave C St 1 1 1 11 2 12 1 2373 Hartnell Ave Northwoods Way 1 11 544 1 1374 Hartnell Ave School St 11 1 10 1375 Hartnell Ave Lawrence Rd 2 11 1 1 12 2 2376 Hartnell Ave Irwin Rd 1 1 11 1 1 71 2377 Hartnell Ave Reservoir Ln 11 1 61 1378 Hartnell Ave Middleton Ln 1 1 2 1 11 550 2 2379 Hartnell Ave Fairway Ave 3 12 1 2 18 3 3380 Hartnell Ave Fairway Ave 2 1 11 1 1 12 2 2381 Hartnell Ave Kenco Ave 1 1 11 11 1 71 2382 Hartnell Ave Yana Ave 11 1 10 1383 Hartnell Ave East Way 11 1 10 1384 Hartnell Ave Churn Ct 2 11 11 12 2 2385 Hartnell Ave Alta Mesa Dr 2 2 11 12 2 2386 Hartnell Ave Leonard St 1 1 11 61 1387 Hartnell Ave Argyle Rd 11 1 61 1388 Canyon Creek Rd Blazingwood Dr 11 1 61 1389 Wyndham Ln Rivella Vista Dr 1 1 11 61 1390 Wilshire Dr Henderson Rd 11 1 11 1 1391 Bechelli Ln Grove St 11 1 10 1392 Bechelli Ln Leila Ave 3 1 1 2 1 11 2 39 4 4393 Bechelli Ln Parsons Dr 1 1 2 31 12 1 19 2 4394 Bechelli Ln Wilshire Dr 11 1 11 1 1395 Bechelli Ln 3rd St 1 1 11 61 1396 Bechelli Ln 2nd St 2 1 1 1 21 12 1 29 3 4397 Bechelli Ln Layton Rd 11 1 1 1 1 17 2 2398 Bechelli Ln Cheryl Dr 11 1 10 1399 Bechelli Ln Loma Vista Dr 2 1 2 11 11 28 3 3400 Bechelli Ln Chinook Dr 1 1 11 61 1401 Bechelli Ln S Bonnyview Rd 2 1 4 15 1 1 1311 1 32 3 7402 C St Saginaw St 1 11 61 1403 C St 5th St 11 1 61 1 Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
404 Layton Rd Ricardo Ave 11 1 10 1405 Camino Ct Adams Ln 11 1 10 1406 Marlene Ave Flintwood Way 11 1 10 1407 Mercury Dr Jupiter Ter 11 1 10 1408 Vega St Mercury Dr 11 1 10 1409 Cockerill Dr Button Pl 11 1 10 1410 Galaxy Way Meteor St 3 1 1 1 11 1 30 3411 Alta Mesa Dr Saturn Skwy 11 1 1 1 1 71 2412 Galaxy Way Polaris Way 11 1 10 1413 Venus Way Capricorn Way 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2414 Whimbledon Dr Laver St 11 1 10 1415 Airport Rd Skypark Dr 11 1 10 1416 Capricorn Way Bridger Dr 11 1 10 1417 Sunglow Dr Oak Glen Dr 11 1 61 1418 Howard Dr Frances Dr 11 1 10 1419 Cedars Rd Riviera Dr 1 11 1 61 1420 Cedars Rd Kenyon Dr 11 1 11 1 1421 Westside Rd Kenyon Dr 11 1 10 1422 Eastside Rd Wilsey Dr 1 1 11 11 1 1423 Eastside Rd Radio Ln 1 11 1 1 1 71 2424 Radio Ln Veterans Ln 11 1 10 1425 Radio Ln N Bonnyview Rd 11 1 1 1 1 71 2426 E Bonnyview Rd Pioneer Ln 11 1 10 1427 E Bonnyview Rd Barrel Ct 11 1 10 1428 S Bonnyview Rd E Bonnyview Rd 1 3 4 121 91 4429 Westside Rd Canyon Creek Rd 2 21 1 20 2430 Estate St Traverse St 11 1 1 1 1 71 2431 Joaquin Ave Ricardo Ave 2 1 1 11 20 2432 Portal Dr Joaquin Ave 1 1 11 2 17 2 2433 Portal Dr Loma Vista Dr 2 11 2 22 2 2434 Ethan Ln Monterra Ln 11 1 10 1435 Lofty Oak Dr Heavenly Oak Dr 11 1 10 1436 Arizona St Starthmore Dr 11 1 10 1437 Screech Owl Ln Squirrel Run Ct 11 1 10 1438 Dandelion Dr Buttercup Ln 11 1 10 1439 Alta Mesa Dr El Verano St 1 1 11 1 1 17 2 2440 Branstetter Ln Branstetter Ct 1 11 11 1 1441 Cedars Rd Branstetter Ln 111 2 1 2 1 18 2 3442 Cedars Rd Acorn Ln 11 1 11 1 1443 Cedars Rd Concord Ln 1 11 30 1 1444 Westside Rd Cedars Rd 1 11 30 1 1445 S Bonnyview Rd Eastside Rd 14 3 5 254 2 2 25 4 97 8 13446 S Bonnyview Rd Indianwood Dr 2 1 1 112 21 1 29 3 4447 Churn Creek Rd I-5 1 1 11 2 71 2448 Rancho Rd Alta Mesa Dr 2 2 1 12 1 12 14 2 4 Packet Pg. 303
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Intersection # Primary Road Secondary Road
Total
Severity Type
Pedestrian
Bicycle
449 Rancho Rd Surrey Dr 11 1 10 1450 Rancho Rd Saratoga Dr 11 1 61 1451 Rancho Rd Goodwater Ave 1 1 11 2 17 2 2452 Rancho Rd Persistence Ln 11 2 1 1 41 2 2453 Rancho Rd Rancho Vista Way 11 1 61 1454 Lofty Oak Dr Alrose Ln 11 1 10 1455 Westwood Ave Jewell Ln 11 1 10 1456 Westside Rd Westwood Ave 3 2 21 33 3 3457 Camino Dr Wilder Dr 11 1 10 1458 Eastside Rd North Dr 21 2 1 2 1 13 2 3459 Eastside Rd Sacramento Dr 11 1 61 1460 Eastside Rd Star Dr 2 2 1 122 1 1 3 35 4 5461 Westside Rd Gelngary Dr 11 10 1462 Eastside Rd Girvan Rd 11 1 1 61 1463 Girvan Rd Pit Rd 11 1 10 1464 Girvan Rd Hemlock St 1 1 11 11 1 1465 Girvan Rd Creekside St 11 1 61 1466 Creekside St Brookside Ln 11 1 10 1467 Creekside St Mullen Pkwy 11 1 10 1468 Knighton Rd Lockheed Dr 2 11 1 1 12 2 2469 Churn Creek Rd Kallerup Dr 11 1 30 1 1470 Mistletoe Ln Deerfield Ave 11 1 1 61 1471 Hilltop Dr Hwy 44 11 1 61 1472 Placer St Wisconsin Ave 11 1 10 1473 Eureka Way Olive Ave 11 1 10 1474 East St Locust St 11 1 10 1475 Oro St Travona St 11 1 10 1476 Churn Creek Rd E Entrance to Food Max 11 1 61 1477 Churn Creek Rd Linda Ln 1 1 1 1 11 71 2478 Tehama St Liberty St 11 1 11 1 1479 Sacramento Dr Hemlock St 11 1 11 1 1480 Parkview Ave Freebridge St 1 1 11 1 11 1 1481 Kenyon Dr Calarasas Hts 11 1 10 1482 Old Oregon Trl Lois Ln 11 1 61 1483 Sacramento St Garden Ave 11 1 10 1484 Market St Hill St 1 1 11 10 1 Total 15 43 275 478 509 120 111 393 417 150 13 68 1 91 67 281 272 251 264 252 - - 1320 Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Collisions at Selected Segments
Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other
Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
002A AKRICH ST RAINTREE LN OASIS RD 1 1 3 32 1 3 1 20 2 5003A KESWICK DAM RD W CITY LIMIT LAKE BLVD 11 1 1 1 1 41 2 2004A OASIS RD LAKE BLVD ALEE LN 11 1 11 1 1 3 42 2 3 004B OASIS RD DAUT RD OAK LEAF LN 1 11 10 1004C OASIS RD OLD OASIS RD RANDOLPH RD 1 11 1 11 1 1004D OASIS RD BALER RD AKRICH ST 2 1 1 11 1 2 23 2 3 005A OLD OREGON TRL AKRICH ST MIDLAND DR 11 1 10 1
005B OLD OREGON TRL MIDLAND DR N CITY LIMIT 1 2 5 31 3 1 1 3 3 1 28 3 8 006A CASCADE BLVD N CITY LIMIT OASIS RD 1 2 11 1 1 2 81 3007A LAKE BLVD GLENWOOD DR OASIS RD 2 2 11 1 1 12 2 2 007B LAKE BLVD OASIS RD KESWICK DAM BLVD 1 1 1 1 1 11 12 1 2007C LAKE BLVD KESWICK DAM BLVD SANTA ROSA WAY 3 1 1 21 2 1 1 34 3 4007D LAKE BLVD SANTA ROSA WAY ST MARK ST 1 1 3 1 2 1 11 2 1 1 1 20 2 5 007E LAKE BLVD ST MARK ST MOUNTAIN SHADOWS BLVD 12 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 52 3 3 007F LAKE BLVD MOUNTAIN SHADOWS BLVD N MARKET ST 1 7 6 1 7 2 1 2 12 1 3314 3 78 8 14 007G LAKE BLVD BLACK MARBLE DR W/O CAMPERS CT 11 2 5 351 1 1 3 5 58 4 9 008A SR 299 LAKE BLVD E/O I5 NB RAMPS 11 2 1 1 71 2009A MAGNUMS WAY LAKE BLVD ST NICHOLAS AVE 11 1 10 1010A SANTA ROSA WAY MAGNUMS WAY LAKE BLVD 11 1 10 1011A ST MARKS ST N END LAKE BLVD 1 11 1 61 1012A HOOPA PATH LITTLE DEER LN LAKE BLVD 11 1 10 1013A BELTLINE RD GOPHER LN WHITE RIVER DR 2 1 1 11 1 1 1 23 2 3014A CATERPILLAR RD BELTLINE RD N MARKET ST 111 2 1 2 1 18 2 3015A TWIN VIEW BLVD OASIS RD CONSTITUTION WAY 2 1 1 11 12 2 2 015B TWIN VIEW BLVD N MARKET ST MOUNTAIN VIEW DR 1 3 2 1 1 11 2 2 3 1 31 4 6015C TWIN VIEW BLVD TWIN VIEW BLVD TWN PEEKS MOBILE HOME PKWY 11 1 10 1 016A ST ANDREWS DR GOLD HILLS CT S END 11 1 11 1 1017A WHITE RIVER DR BELTLINE RD REDWOOD BLVD 1 1 2 11 36 2 2018A REDWOOD BLVD CATERPILLAR RD NORTH POINT DR 1 2 2 1 11 1 81 3019A NORTH POINT DR LAKE BLVD N MARKET ST 11 1 10 1020A VALLEYRIDGE DR TWIN VIEW BLVD RIDGE RD 11 1 61 1021A N BOULDER DR VALLEYRIDGE DR LAKE BLVD 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 18 2 3022A BOULDER CREEK DR N BOULDER DR E END 11 1 10 1023A BEAUMONT DR W END E END 11 1 10 1024A MOUNTAIN VIEW DR TWIN VIEW BLVD TERRA LINDA WAY 2 11 1 1 20 2025A HAWLEY RD N END LEAF LN 1 11 10 1026A BLACK OAK LN W END HAWLEY RD 11 1 10 1027A COLLYER DR CHURN CREEK RD POISON OAK LN 2 1 1 11 20 2028A COLLEGEVIEW DR BETHEL LN W/O OLD OREGON TRL 2 3 1 1 2 1 11 2 1 2 1 41 5 6029A QUARTZ HILL RD RIVER RIDGE DR S/O MT BONNINGTON DR 1 1 11 2 12 1 2 029B QUARTZ HILL RD S/O MT BONNINGTON DR N MARKET ST 2 11 1 1 3 13 2 3 030A BENTON DR MIDDLE CREEK RD RIVERSIDE DR 1 11 1 10 1 030B BENTON DR MIDDLE CREEK RD N MARKET ST 1 3 4 1 213 1 1 1 4 2 1 33 4 8 031A LOMA ST QUARTZ HILL RD BENTON DR 1 11 11 1 1032A BUENAVENTURA BLVD N CITY LIMIT S END 11 1 10 1033A DELTA ST BETON DR QUARTZ HILL RD 11 1 10 1034A ARBORETUM DR ARBORETUM DR E END 11 1 61 1035A BUCKEYE TR CLAY ST DOGWOOD LN 21 1 1 1 20 2036A DOGWOOD LN W END E END 11 1 1 1 2 41 2 2037A MASONIC AVE LAKE BLVD S END 11 1 10 1038A N MARKET ST LAKE BLVD BENTON DR 1 1 1 2 1 111 18 2 3 038B N MARKET ST BENTON DR QUARTZ HILL RD 1 2 1 2 1 11 13 1 3 Pedestrian
Bicycle
Year
Total
Severity Type
Segment # Primary Road Begin of Segment End of Segment
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other
Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
Pedestrian
Bicycle
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Total
Severity Type
Segment # Primary Road Begin of Segment End of Segment
038C MARKET ST QUARTZ HILL RD EUREKA WAY 2 1 3 13 11 1 1 1 2 2 31 3 6038D MARKET ST EUREKA WAY TEHAMA ST 11 1 10 1 038E MARKET ST PLACER ST GOLD ST 2 1 1 11 20 2
038F S MARKET ST GOLD ST GEARY ST 2 1 11 1 2 1 13 2 3
039A HILLTOP DR LAKE BLVD N/O HILLTOP DR 1 7 2 4 6 42 1 11 3 2 6 1 2 123 10 14 039B HILLTOP DR N/O HILLTOP DR ST THOMAS PKWY 1 2 6 2 2 5 21 1 1 1 3 3 2 3 604 9 11039C HILLTOP DR ST THOMAS PKWY S/O RIVER BEND RD 1 2 111 1 2 13 1 3039D HILLTOP DR S/O RIVER BEND RD N/O BROWNING ST 2 4 12111 1 3 1 1 1 26 2 6 039E HILLTOP DR N/O BROWNING ST MARAGLIA ST 1 3 9 14 19 1 11 4 12 10 4 4 5 3 13 10 11 4 8 836 27 46040A PEPPERTREE LN HILLTOP DR WOODCLIFF DR 11 1 10 1041A WOODHILL DR WOODCLIFF DR TEAKWOOD DR 11 1 10 1042A BLACK MARBLE WAY LAKE BLVD S END 1 1 11 61 1043A CAMPERS CT BOULDER DR S END 11 1 11 1 1044A CHURN CREEK RD COLLEGE VIEW DR BROWNING ST 12 3 1 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 70 6 6 044B CHURN CREEK RD BROWNING ST DANA DR 14 1 4 1 42 3 1 3 3 1 3 84 6 10044C CHURN CREEK RD DANA DR PRESIDIO ST 11 1 1 2 17 2 2044D CHURN CREEK RD PRESIDIO ST S BONNYVIEW RD 1 4 14 23 28 10 8 9 21 14 4 4 5 5 17 14 14 11 14 984 42 70 044E CHURN CREEK RD S BONNYVIEW RD HARTMEYER LN 2 11 1 1 12 2 2 044F CHURN CREEK RD HARTMEYER LN S/O RANCHO RD 1 2 3 1 32 3 1 2 30 6 045A DAKOTA WAY TIDMORE LN E/O DANBURY DR 11 1 10 1046A CHANCELOR BLVD PALACIO DR HACIENDA DR 11 1 10 1047A SHASTA VIEW DR HEMINGWAY ST INSPIRATION PL 1 1 12 1 12 1 18 2 3 047B SHASTA VIEW DR INSPIRATION PL ATRIUM WAY 11 1 61 1047C SHASTA VIEW DR ATRIUM WAY GOODWATER AVE 31 2 11 1 30 3047D SHASTA VIEW DR GOODWATER AVE LEONARD ST 1 2 2 3 1 2 31 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 67 5 8 047E SHASTA VIEW DR LEONARD ST CASTLEWOOD DR 11 1 10 1
047F SHASTA VIEW DR CASTLEWOOD DR RANCHO RD 21 1 1 1 20 2 048A OLD OREGON TRL S/O LOIS LN E CITY LIMIT 11 1 61 1
048B OLD OREGON TRL ACCIDENT LN VIKING WAY 11 1 30 1 1048C OLD OREGON TRL HARVEY LEIGHTON RD OLD 44 DR 1 2 5 1 213 1 2 2 4 28 3 8048D OLD OREGON TRL OLD 44 DR HARTNELL AVE 2 1 12 1 2 13 2 3 048E OLD OREGON TRL MISTY LN RANCHO RD 11 2 2 12 1 2
048F OLD OREGON TRL RANCHO RD DESPARADO TRL 11 1 61 1
049A MISSION SIERRA CT MISSION DE ORO DR E END 2 11 1 1 20 2050A MISSION DE ORO DR MILL VALLEY PKWY BROWNING ST 1 11 11 1 1051A CANBY RD SPRINGER DR BROWNING ST 11 1 11 1 1 052B CANBY RD BROWNING ST OLD ALTURAS RD 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 18 2 3 053A BROWNING ST HILLTOP DR CANBY RD 2 11 2 20 2
053B BROWNING ST CHURN CREEK RD OLD ALTURAS RD 11 1 10 1 054A SPRINGER DR S/O BOBWHITE WAY WHISTLING DR 1 11 1 61 1055A WHISTLING DR SPRINGER DR S/O PARTRIDGE DR 11 1 10 1056A WINGSETTER WAY PARTRIDGE DR PARTRIDGE DR 1 11 11 1 1057A LANCERS LN CHURN CREEK RD BROWNING ST 1 1 1 1 1 11 12 1 2058A BRANDON CT N END S END 11 1 10 1059A GROUSE DR WHISTLING DR N/O PARTRIDGE DR 1 2 21 1 1 1 13 1 3060A EDGEWOOD DR N END OLD ALTURAS RD 11 1 10 1061A OLD ALTURAS RD CANBY RD BROWNING ST 3 2 4 13131 1 1312 2 49 5 9 061B OLD ALTURAS RD BROWNING ST LEMA RD 2 1 1 31 1 1 2 29 3 4 062A ARROYO MANOR DR OLD ALTURAS RD CASA VEREDA WAY 11 1 11 1 1063A DANA DR HILLTOP DR BRADFORD RD 1 7 6 1 2 6 3 1 11 1 3311 6 59 8 14 063B DANA DR BRADFORD RD VICTOR AVE 11 2 1 1 17 2 2
064A E PALISADES AVE VIEW AVE HILLTOP DR 11 1 61 1065A FRIENDLY RD OLD ALTURAS RD DANA DR 1 2 1 2 11 1 1 23 3 3 Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other
Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
Pedestrian
Bicycle
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Total
Severity Type
Segment # Primary Road Begin of Segment End of Segment
066A SALMONBERRY DR MARIGOLD WAY E/O IMPERIAL DR 1 11 11 1 1067A VICTOR AVE DANA DR AZOULAY CT 2 11 1 1 20 2 067B VICTOR AVE AZOULAY CT MISTLETOE LN 1 1 11 1 1 31 1 2067C VICTOR AVE MISTLETOE LN BURKSGARDEN ST 2 1 12 1 1 1 13 2 3067D VICTOR AVE BURKSGARDEN ST E CYPRESS AVE 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 37 2 3 067E VICTOR AVE E CYPRESS AVE S/O BUNKER ST 1 2 1 2 1 1 11 13 1 3 067F VICTOR AVE S/O BUNKER ST GALAXY WAY 3 5 3 1 3 41 1 11 2 2 3 1 3 66 8 11 067G VICTOR AVE EL VISTA ST CHURN CREEK RD 11 1 61 1
068A LEISHA LN W END E END 11 1 10 1069A WEST ST 7TH ST EUREKA WAY 1 11 1 11 1 1070A 11TH ST EUREKA WAY N COURT ST 1 1 11 1 1 17 2 2071A RIVERSIDE DR N COURT ST N MARKET ST 1 1 11 1 1 71 2072A CENTER ST RIVERSIDE DR EUREKA WAY 11 1 10 1073A CALIFORNIA ST RIVERSIDE DR TRINITY ST 11 1 10 1 073B CALIFORNIA ST EUREKA WAY TEHAMA ST 11 1 10 1073C CALIFORNIA ST TEHAMA ST GOLD ST 11 1 1 1 1 71 2073D CALIFORNIA ST GOLD ST S MARKET ST 11 1 11 1 1 074A CONTINENTAL ST N/O TRINITY ST SOUTH ST 11 1 61 1075A AUDITORIUM DR W END SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR 11 1 10 1076A SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR 11 1 1 2 71 2077A PALISADES AVE HILLTOP DR S END 2 11 1 1 20 2078A ASPIN AVE VICTOR AVE E END 11 1 10 1079A SHINING STAR WAY TUSCANY WAY VIENNA WAY 11 1 10 1080A TARMAC RD TUSCANY WAY CROSSFIRE WAY 11 1 10 1081A ABERNATHY LN TARMAC RD HWY 44 11 1 11 1 1082A AIRSTRIP RD TRUMPET DR S END 1 11 30 1 1083A VIKING WAY AIRSTRIP RD N STAR DR 1 1 11 1 1 17 2 2084A OLD 44 DR OLD OREGON TRL BRANDY LN 11 1 10 1085A LYNBROOK LOOP CARSON DR CARSON DR 1 11 1 11 1 1086A EUREKA WAY RIDGE DR N COURT ST 11 1 111 1 2 42 2 3 086B EUREKA WAY N COURT ST N MARKET ST 2 1 12 1 1 1 1 28 3 3 087A RIDGE DR EUREKA WAY LAKESIDE DR 11 1 10 1088A BUENAVENTURA BLVD EUREKA WAY LAKESIDE DR 11 1 10 1 088B BUENAVENTURA BLVD TETON DR CANYON CREEK RD 1 2 1 11 2 1 81 3088C BUENAVENTURA BLVD CANYON CREEK RD RAILROAD AVE 2 1 1 1 11 22 2 2 089A GALWAY DR N/O BRINN DR MOYVANE DR 11 1 10 1090A RECORD LN W CITY LIMIT E END 11 1 10 1091A KILDARE DR OCONNOR AVE N/O KILDARE CT 11 1 10 1092A LAKESIDE DR KILKEE DR BUENAVENTURA BLVD 11 1 61 1093A MANZANITA HILLS AVE FOOTHILL BLVD SHASTA ST 11 1 10 1094A ALMOND AVE EUREKA WAY PLACER ST 11 1 10 1095A SHASTA ST FOOTHILL BLVD WEST ST 13 3 1 1 1 2 91 4 095B SHASTA ST WEST ST CALIFORNIA ST 1 1 2 2 11 2 1 1 19 2 4095C SHASTA ST MARKET ST PINE ST 22 1 1 20 2095D SHASTA ST PINE ST LIBERTY ST 11 1 61 1 096A WILLIS ST EUREKA WAY PLACER ST 2 1 2 11 1 2 23 2 3097A CHESNUT ST SHASTA ST S/O AMELIA CT 11 1 10 1098A OLIVE AVE EUREKA WAY PLACER ST 1 1 1 1 1 11 71 2099A N COURT ST RIVERSIDE DR EUREKA WAY 11 1 10 1 099B COURT ST EUREKA WAY YUBA ST 1 6 3211 2131 17 1 7099C COURT ST YUBA ST PLACER ST 1 11 61 1099D COURT ST PLACER ST GOLD ST 1 2 1 11 1 1 1 1 13 1 3 099E COURT ST GOLD ST SCHLEY AVE 11 1 1 1 1 17 2 2
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other
Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
Pedestrian
Bicycle
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Total
Severity Type
Segment # Primary Road Begin of Segment End of Segment
100A PINE ST SHASTA ST CYPRESS AVE 3 1 5 3 32 1 12 1 2 3 3 44 4 9101A EAST ST TEHAMA ST PLACER ST 11 1 11 1 1 101B EAST ST SACRAMENTO ST LINCOLN ST 11 1 10 1101C EAST ST LINCOLN ST PINE ST 1 1 11 1 1 71 2 102A LIBERTY ST BUTTE ST PLACER ST 11 1 11 1 1103A YUBA ST COURT ST CALIFORNIA ST 1 1 11 1 1 1 12 1 2 103B YUBA ST PINE ST CONTINENTAL ST 11 1 10 1
104A PARK MARINA DR SEQUOIA ST SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR 1 1 1 1 11 17 2 2 104B PARK MARINA DR SUNDIAL BRIDGE DR ROME AVE 1 2 1 1 21 1 1 2 24 3 4104C PARK MARINA DR ROME AVE WASHINGTON AVE 1 2 12 1 1 1 81 3104D PARK MARINA DR WASHINGTON AVE LOCUST ST 11 1 61 1 104E PARK MARINA DR LOCUST ST PARKVIEW AVE 22 2 22 2 2105A TEHAMA ST MARKET ST CONTINENTAL ST 11 1 11 1 1106A PLACER ST BOSTON AVE CUMBERLAND DR 2 3 11 3 1 4 15 2 5 106B PLACER ST CUMBERLAND DR HIGHLAND AVE 6 4 3 1 423 3 3 1 4 1 2 5 93 10 13106C PLACER ST HIGHLAND AVE JAY ST 11 1 10 1106D PLACER ST JAY ST EAST ST 3 3 10 1 5 4 2 1 2 1 2 4 6 2 1 3 61 6 16 106E PLACER ST EAST ST E END 22 1 1 20 2107A SACRAMENTO ST CALIFORNIA ST EAST ST 2 11 1 1 20 2108A SOUTH ST COURT ST EAST ST 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 21 33 1 4 108B SOUTH ST EAST ST ATHENS AVE 1 1 1 1 1 11 17 2 2108C SOUTH ST ATHENS AVE PARK MARINA DR 21 1 2 20 2 109A SEQUOIA ST BUTTE ST SOUTH ST 11 1 10 1110A ATHENS AVE PARK MARINA DR SOUTH ST 11 1 10 1 110B ATHENS AVE SOUTH ST CYPRESS AVE 1 2 11 1 2 1 81 3
111A CANAL DR SOUTH ST LOCUST ST 11 1 10 1112A LOCUST ST EAST ST ATHENS AVE 3 12 1 1 1 30 3113A CIVIC CENTER DR LOCUST ST CYPRESS AVE 1 1 4 2 11 2 1 1 3 1 21 2 6114A W CYPRESS AVE MARKET ST PARK MARINA DR 11 5 4 4 2 3 1 4 1 4 4 2 4322 4 657 11 15 114B E CYPRESS AVE PARK MARINA DR CHURN CREEK RD 1 3 8 23 16 4 7 6 24 3 1 2 4 4 5 8 6 9 13 15 876 35 51114C E CYPRESS AVE CHURN CREEK RD ALFREDA WAY 1 3 12 1 1 2 1 91 4114D E CYPRESS AVE ALFREDA WAY VICTOR AVE 3 2 2 11 32 1 2 2 2 1 47 5 7 114E E CYPRESS AVE VICTOR AVE E END 1 11 10 1115A MISTLETOE LN CHURN CREEK RD E END 12 2 3 1 24 1 11 1 4 3 67 5 8116A INDUSTRIAL ST CHURN CREEK RD E END 11 1 10 1117A CANBY RD N END MISTLETOE LN 11 1 10 1118A OXFORD RD N/O OAKDALE LN E CYPRESS AVE 11 1 10 1119A MANCHESTER DR VICTOR AVE E END 1 11 10 1120A GOODWATER AVE W END SHASTA VIEW DR 1 1 11 11 1 1 120B GOODWATER AVE SHASTA VIEW DR HARTNELL AVE 11 1 61 1 121A HENDERSON RD N END WILSHIRE DR 1 11 2 1 1 2 37 2 3122A HARTNELL AVE E CYPRESS AVE C ST 3 3 7 1 2 3 1 4 1 11 1 4222 3 58 6 13 122B HARTNELL AVE NORTHWOODS WAY KENCO AVE 1 3 6 9 13 2 5 4 11 6 4 6 2 2 11 10 5 4 767 19 32122C HARTNELL AVE YANA AVE SHASTA VIEW DR 2 2 4 2 221 1 1 3 1 2 2 38 4 8122D HARTNELL AVE GOODWATER AVE AIRPORT RD 12 2 2 1 1 3 2 3 2 1 1 618 5 7 123A HARTNELL AVE YANA AVE CHURN CT 2 11 1 1 1 22 2 2124A BECHELLI LN S/O TURTLE BAY PARK E CYPRESS AVE 1 1 4 1311 1 3 2 21 2 6 124B BECHELLI LN E CYPRESS AVE N/O 3RD ST 1 1 4 14 9 4 4 3 14 1 2 1 1 4 5 8 5 5 6 711 20 29124C BECHELLI LN 3RD ST CHINOOK DR 2 3 5 1 1 3 23 1 1 3 5 45 5 10124D BECHELLI LN CHINOOK DR N/O S BONNYVIEW RD 1 11 1 1 1 71 2 124E BECHELLI LN N/O S BONNYVIEW RD S BONNYVIEW RD 1 1 1 3 1 11 37 2 3 124F BECHELLI LN S BONNYVIEW RD SUNNYHILL LN 11 1 10 1
125A JUNE ST MARAGLIA ST S END 1 11 1 2 12 1 2
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other
Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
Pedestrian
Bicycle
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Total
Severity Type
Segment # Primary Road Begin of Segment End of Segment
126A LARKSPUR LN MARAGLIA ST PARSONS DR 11 1 61 1
126B LARKSPUR LN INDUSTRIAL ST E CYPRESS AVE 11 1 61 1
127A ALFREDA WAY E CYPRESS AVE HARTNELL AVE 11 1 10 1128A RESERVOIR LN E CYPRESS AVE HARTNELL AVE 11 1 10 1129A SOBRE CT E CYPRESS AVE S END 1 11 1 11 1 1130A WILSON AVE W/O JASMINE WAY GOODWATER AVE 1 1 11 1 1 12 1 2131A DARTMOUTH DR RAINIER DR E/O SIENA AVE 1 11 11 1 1132A WASATCH DR CUMBERLAND DR E END 11 1 10 1133A BLUE BELL DR ASPEN GLOW LN E END 11 1 10 1134A STARBURST DR BLUE BELL DR CANYON CREEK RD 11 1 10 1135A AIRPARK DR PLACER ST ROSALINE AVE 11 1 61 1136A ROSALINE AVE AIRPARK DR COURT ST 11 2 1 1 12 1 2137A LINDEN AVE W END WEST ST 1 11 30 1 1138A WEST ST ROSALINE AVE LAUREL AVE 11 1 61 1139A LAUREL AVE WEST ST RAILROAD AVE 11 1 10 1140A RAILROAD AVE YUBA ST PLACER ST 11 1 10 1 140B RAILROAD AVE SOUTH ST BUENAVENTURA BLVD 12 2 4 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 3212 2 651 9 10 141A PARKVIEW AVE S MARKET ST STATE ST 1 1 2 12 1 1 1 1 1 1 38 2 4 141B PARKVIEW AVE STATE ST FREEBRIDGE ST 1 1 11 61 1141C PARKVIEW AVE FREEBRIDGE ST CYPRESS AVE 1 1 2 11 17 2 2 142A FAVRETTO AVE PARKVIEW AVE GRANGE ST 11 1 10 1143A FELL ST S MARKET ST LELNAD AVE 11 1 10 1144A LELAND AVE PARKVIEW AVE GRANGE ST 11 1 10 1145A FREEBRIDGE ST SMILE PL RIO ST 11 1 10 1146A HAMILTON ST FREEBRIDGE ST E END 11 1 10 1147A RIO ST W END MAHAN ST 11 1 10 1148A GEARY ST S MARKET ST POLK ST 11 1 10 1149A TEXAS SPRINGS RD S CITY LIMIT BRANSTETTER LN 11 1 11 1 1150A BRANSTETTER LN TEXAS SPRINGS RD S MARKET ST 11 1 10 1151A HOWARD DR SUNGLOW DR EL RENO LN 1 11 1 1 1 71 2152A SUNGLOW DR WINTER GREEN CT OAK GLEN DR 11 1 61 1153A RIVIERA DR OAK GLEN DR CEDARS RD 1 1 11 1 1 1 17 2 2154A KENYON DR W END E/O CHANTILLY LN 11 1 10 1155A CEDARS RD EL RANCHO RD S MARKET ST 1 21 2 2 1 13 1 3156A WESTSIDE RD CANYON CREEK RD CEDARS RD 2 7 112 5 2 2 1 2 2 29 2 9 156B WESTSIDE RD JEWELL LN WESTWOOD AVE 2 2 11 20 2156C WESTSIDE RD WESTWOOD AVE GLENGARY DR 11 1 11 1 1156D WESTSIDE RD CLEAR CREEK RD SR 273 1 11 61 1 157A SEVERTSON DR LELAND AVE E END 1 11 1 11 1 1158A EASTSIDE RD WYNDHAM LN N/O S BONNYVIEW RD 1 2 2 1 2 11 3 2 44 3 5 158B EASTSIDE RD N/O S BONNYVIEW RD S BONNYVIEW RD 11 1 61 1158C EASTSIDE RD S BONNYVIEW RD GIRVAN RD 1 5 9 2 4 1 71 5 2 5 2 1 50 6 15 159A E BONNYVIEW RD RADIO LN S BONNYVIEW RD 1 1 1 1 11 1 2 18 2 3160A BONNYVIEW AVE BONNIE DR N BONNYVIEW RD 11 1 61 1161A N BONNYVIEW RD EASTSIDE RD E/O E BONNYVIEW RD 1 1 11 30 1 1162A BIDWELL RD N END N BONNYVIEW RD 11 1 10 1163A RENO LN N END S BONNYVIEW RD 11 1 10 1164A OLD BARN WAY FARM HOUSE LN BARREL CT 11 1 10 1165A C ST HARTNELL AVE LAYTON RD 2 11 1 1 20 2166A SAGNAW ST W END C ST 11 1 10 1167A 2ND ST BECHELLI LN C ST 11 1 10 1168A RICARDO AVE LAYTON RD JOAQUIN AVE 22 1 1 20 2169A LOMA VISTA DR BECHELLI LN ETHAN LN 1 11 1 11 1 1 Packet Pg. 309
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Fatal
Injury (Severe)
Injury (Other
Visible)
Injury (Complaint of
Pain)
Property Damage
Only
Head-on
Sideswipe
Rear End
Broadside
Hit Object
Overturned
Vehicle/ Pedestrian
Other/Not Listed
Pedestrian
Bicycle
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
EPDO
Fatal + Injury
Year
Total
Severity Type
Segment # Primary Road Begin of Segment End of Segment
170A DIANE ST CHARLENE WAY WOODACRE DR 11 1 30 1 1171A KERRYJEN CT W END RICARDO AVE 11 1 10 1172A LE BRUN LN CHURN CREEK RD LAWRENCE RD 2 33 2 1 2 1 2 15 2 5173A LAWRENCE RD HARTNELL AVE MADEWOOD LN 1 1 1 1 11 12 1 2174A HARPOLE RD CHURN CREEK RD E/O ALMA AVE 11 1 10 1175A HARROW DR HARPOLE RD S END 11 1 61 1176A SUNWOOD DR N/O VEGA ST MORNINGSUN DR 11 1 10 1177A DOMINION DR DENTON WAY JAMES PL 11 1 10 1178A CONIFER WAY W/O VICTOR AVE E/O VICTOR AVE 11 1 10 1179A ALTA MESA DR HARTNELL AVE RANCHO RD 3 1 311 1 2 1 34 3 4180A ALDEN AVE COCKERILL ST SHASTA VIEW DR 11 1 61 1181A SUZETTE AVE ALTA MESA DR LARAMIE ST 11 1 10 1182A SATURN SKWY MERCURY DR SHASTA VIEW DR 11 1 1 1 1 71 2183A SCORPIUS WAY SATURN SKWY GALAXY WAY 1 11 1 2 12 1 2184A ORION WAY SATURN SKWY VENUS WAY 1 1 11 61 1185A POLARIS WAY SATURN SKWY S/O NEBULA ST 11 1 10 1186A GALAXY WAY MORNINGSUN DR MEADOW OAKS WAY 2 11 1 1 22 2 2187A NEBULA ST VIRGO ST POLARIS WAY 11 1 10 1188A EL VERANO ST COLUMBINE DR ST CHARLES DR 11 1 11 1 1189A CASABELLA DR ST CHARLES DR W/O TEMPLETON DR 11 1 10 1190A RANCHO RD BO PEEP LN SHASTA VIEW DR 11 1 10 1 190B RANCHO RD GOODWATER AVE OLD OREGON TRL 11 1 2 111 1 1 1 1 1 2 49 3 5 191A LEONARD ST HARTNELL AVE N/O FOREST HOMES DR 11 1 10 1192A ARGLE RD HARTNELL AVE AIRPORT RD 11 1 1 2 12 1 2193A AIRPORT RD PRESERVE BLVD N/O BILLY JEAN LN 11 1 11 1 1 193B AIRPORT RD ENGINEERS LN MILL LN 1 5 1 4 1 11 1 4 1 1 42 6 7193C AIRPORT RD S/O SYLVIA LN S CITY LIMIT 1 2 3 2 1 2 1 21 1 1 2 2 1 3 72 6 8 194A ELECTRO WAY AIRPORT RD E END 11 1 10 1195A KNIGHTON RD SW CITY LIMIT AIRPORT RD 11 1 10 1196A WOODRUM CIR MUNICIPAL BLVD MUNICPAL BLVD 1 11 1 61 1197A S BONNYVIEW RD S MARKET ST CHURN CREEK RD 2 5 6 13 2 6 6 3 8 1 3 2459 6 164 13 26198A SACRAMENTO DR E/O CENTER DR W/O RIVERSIDE DR 1 1 2 11 12 1 2199A CLEAR CREEK RD E/O SW CITY LIMIT S/W CITY LIMIT 211 2 2 2 1 1 29 3 4 199B CLEAR CREEK RD SW CITY LIMIT SR 273 11 1 10 1
200A CREEKSIDE ST MULLEN PKWY GIRVAN RD 11 1 10 1201A GIRVAN RD EASTSIDE RD CREEKSIDE ST 1 11 1 1 1 12 1 2202A PIT RD N/O BROOCH CT S/O PLATINUM WAY 1 11 11 1 1203A REDDING RANCHERIA RD W END RT 273 11 1 10 1204A CANYON RD RT 273 S/O S CITY LIMIT 1 2 31 4 1 1 121 2 45 3 6205A VALLEY VIEW RD N END CANYON RD 11 1 10 1206A JULY WAY YULETIDE AVE E/O PATTERSON CT 11 1 10 1207A GOLD ST CALIFORNIA ST MARKET ST 11 1 10 1 207B GOLD ST MARKET ST PINE ST 11 1 11 1 1
208A ECHO RD CHURN CREEK RD ODIN CT 11 1 10 1209A ROME AVE ATHENS AVE PARK MARINA DR 1 11 10 1210A SACRAMENTO RIVER TRL MIDDLE CREEK RD OVERHILL DR 1 1 11 30 1 1211A PARSONS DR HARTNELL AVE CHURN CREEK RD 11 1 10 1212A DOWNARD LN CHURN CREEK RD E END 11 1 61 1213A GOLD ST WEST ST COURT ST 11 1 10 1 Total 9 50 221 285 477 112 158 154 195 261 49 60 53 71 55 208 215 217 181 221 - - 1044 Packet Pg. 310
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Appendix B – Stakeholder
and Public Input
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Meeting Summary
GHD
669 Pacific Street Suite A San Luis Obispo California 93401 United States T +1 805 242 0461 W www.ghd.com
December 18, 2020
To: Shelby Nadin Project: City of Redding Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP)

From: Kathy Kleinschmidt (GHD) Ref/Job No.: 11215289
CC: Farid Rahman (GHD)
Emily Darke (GHD)
File No.: LRSPMS0001.docx
Subject: Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) Meeting #1 Summary – December 10th, 2020 The following is GHD’s understanding of the discussions and decisions for the above referenced meeting. Please notify GHD of any discrepancies in the information recorded.

This meeting record has been prepared to serve as documentation for the virtual meeting conducted on December 10th, 2020 via Microsoft Teams platform. A PowerPoint presentation was used to focus the discussion.

All participants attending virtually, no sign-in sheet was circulated. Rather, the list of attendees will be provided at the end of this document.

1. Introductions
A. Attendees of LRSP meeting
I. Self-introductions of meeting attendees
a. Attendees are listed at the back of the document

2. Meeting Summary
A. Background
I. Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP)
a. Similar process to a Systemic Safety Analysis Report (SSAR), but replacing the SSAR process by Caltrans and FHWA
b. Consistent with the State’s Strategic Safety Plan (SHSP) and focuses on the 5 E’S of traffic safety – Engineering, Education, Enforcement, Emergency Response and Emerging Technologies (new addition) c. Circular process with a living document – updated periodically. d. Will be required for next cycle of Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) - Cycle 11.

B. Current Emerging Technologies
I. Signal preemption for emergency response and a project is being investigated regarding preemption (transit priority at signals) for buses II. Signal coordination along corridors
III. Communication with traffic signals
C. Focus Challenge Areas per SHSP - Challenge areas will be identified based on collision data and interactive poll with the LRSP group participants were taken during the meeting.

Top 5 challenge areas identified in the poll are shown below. Results of the interactive poll are attached to this meeting summary.

I. Pedestrian
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) LRSPMS0001 / 11214205 2
II. Distracted Driving
III. Bicyclists
IV. Intersection
V. Impaired Driving
a. Mark Montgomery (Redding Police Department) mentioned that PD is implementing DUI checkpoints to address impaired driving b. 6 required checkpoints per Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) grant c. Effectiveness of DUI checkpoints are somewhat diminished by social media release of locations of checkpoint. Drivers are aware of where the checkpoints will be. Some unlicensed drivers are caught at DUI checkpoint.
d. Some impaired drivers are apprehended in the periphery of the checkpoints by patrolling officers.
e. DUI saturation patrols is the most effective way of apprehending DUI drivers
D. Overall Collision Analysis
I. Collision density map of all City of Redding collisions shows concentration of collisions along the following corridors.
a. Hartnell Avenue
b. Cypress Avenue
c. Churn Creek Road
d. Hilltop Road
e. Lake Boulevard
f. Rancho Road – S Bonnyview Road
II. Collision Density map of City of Redding fatal and severe injury collision shows concentration of collisions along the following corridors. a. Cypress Avenue
b. Hartnell Avenue
c. Lake Boulevard
d. Churn Creek Road
III. Caltrans collision analysis shows high density of collisions along SR 299, SR 44 and SR 273, at the intersection of SR 299 (Eureka Way) and SR 273 (S market Street) and at the intersection of SR 44 (Tehama Street) and SR 273 (S Market Street).

IV. Collision Severity and Type On City roadways
a. Within the City there were 25 fatal and 93 severe injury collisions in the last 5 years (2015-2019).
b. Main types of fatal collisions are broadside and pedestrian-vehicle collisions.
c. Top five collision types are broadside, rear ends, hit-object, sideswipe and head-on collisions
i. There are advanced dilemma zone detection at some of the city intersections.
ii. Distracted driving is a contributing factor in rear-end collisions. d. Reflective back plates at signals is another countermeasure that can be implemented at signalized intersection to reduce rear-end collisions. i. Currently Caltrans is implementing this countermeasure at locations that are likely to experience power outage due to weather conditions. Data on effectiveness of this
countermeasure is limited. (confirmed by Jesse Solorio
(Caltrans))
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) LRSPMS0001 / 11214205 3
ii. City of Redding does not have any intersection with this countermeasure.
e. Hit object collisions can be mitigated by installing delineators on fixed objects inside the clear recovery zones.

E. Environmental Factor
I. Most collisions were in dry condition when there were no unusual condition in roadways.

II. There were three collision reported as “streetlight not functioning”. These collisions (two in 2019 and one in 2018) were located at the following locations:
a. Hilltop Drive 85’ east of Mercedes Lane
b. Churn Creek Road at Hillmonte Drive
c. Hartnell Avenue at Victor Avenue
d. GHD will coordinate with the City with the details of this information F. Violation Category
I. The top 5 violation category for City collisions are: unsafe speed, DUI/BUI, automobile right of way violation, wrong side of the road driving and improper turning.

II. Unsafe Speed at busy intersections could be because other vehicles are in slow speed conditions (stop and go type traffic) where unsafe start would maybe be more applicable
G. Pedestrian Collisions
I. There were 163 total collisions pedestrian related collision recorded in the City of Redding roadways. Pedestrians involved in crossing were crossing in crosswalk at intersection, crossing not in a crosswalk and walking in road, including shoulder.

II. Collisions were observed along Lake Boulevard, S Market St, E Cypress Avenue, Hartnell Avenue, and Placer Street
III. Mark Montgomery (Redding Police) mentioned that pedestrian collisions at segment could be caused by certain population not recognize crossing at designated locations (pedestrian violations). There are mitigation measures (crossing) at some of the highlighted segments already. a. Potential education program can be implement to combat this.

IV. A location of concern along SR 273 is near the Win-River Resort and Casino.

Redding police reports that some pedestrian wearing dark clothing are crossing SR 273 (S Market Street) mid-block (not at crossing) north of the intersection of SR 273 (S Market Street) at Redding Rancheria Road.
a. Pedestrians are crossing near the south end of the bridge over Clear Creek and walking along the west side of the bridge (pedestrians are walking northbound opposite direction of traffic flow) near edgeline where no sidewalks are present. Lighting is also limited at this location. b. There is a transient trail across the street which is creating the demand for a crossing.
c. Pedestrians crossing are often under the influence.
d. Caltrans has a few projects in the area including
i. Enhanced crosswalk at Girvan Rd which will adjust some grades at the railroad crossing
ii. A grade separated path is planned on the west side of SR 273 but the path will merge with the bridge.
iii. John Abshier (City of Redding Public Works) has sent the plans for the improvement to GHD to be included in the LRSP process.

H. Bicycle Collisions
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) LRSPMS0001 / 11214205 4
I. Broadside is the most common bicycle collision type; there are a total of 122 bicycle collisions recorded in the City of Redding roadways.

II. Wrong Side of Road is top violation category
a. Some bicyclists travelling the wrong way on the sidewalk and coming off into intersection
b. Concentration of bicycle collisions on Lake Blvd
i. Possibly due to high concentration of driveways
I. Collision source
I. The current analysis takes into account all collisions reported to SWITRS. a. The city has their own database of collisions.
b. Redding Police Department is recording collisions on the Spillman database
i. This database does not include property damage only (PDO) collisions.

J. Current Safety related projects
I. HSIP Projects
a. Hartnell Avenue from Churn Creek Road to Victor Avenue – In planning/construction
i. Construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk
ii. American with Disability (ADA) compliant curb ramp and other facilities
iii. Restriping of roadway to include 2 travel lanes in each direction, a Two-way-left turn lane and buffered bike lanes.
iv. Enhanced crossings across Hartnell Avenue with refuge island at Alfreda Way and east of Reservoir Lane.
v. Consolidation of driveway (access management) to reduce vehicular conflict
b. Churn Creek Road Hartnell Road and Cypress Avenue – In planning/construction
i. Construction of curb, gutter and sidewalk
ii. Restriping of roadway to include bike lanes
iii. Enhanced crossing across Churn Creek Road at the intersection of Margalia St
iv. Possible installation of speed reduction tables at Maraglia Street at Blueview Street and at Larkspur Lane near Parsons Middle School
c. Systemic intersection lighting – submitted Cycle 10
i. Focused on broadside collisons and night collisions
ii. Benefit to Cost Ratio (BCR) was 30+ (very competitive) d. Protected left turn phasing in downtown area – submitted in Cycle 10 i. Focused on broadside collisions
ii. BCR was 17-18 (very competitive)
II. ATP grant application
a. Victor Avenue from E Cypress Avenue to Hartnell Road. i. Protected intersection Hartnell Road and Victor Avenue ii. Roundabout at E Cypress Avenue and Victor Avenue
iii. Shared use path and bike lanes on west side of Victor Avenue b. E Cypress Avenue from Alfreda Way to Victor Avenue
c. Alfreda Way north of E Cypress St
d. Sundial Bridge Drive shared used path (Downtown to Turtle Bay) i. Currently there is a gap in the path that connects Sacramento Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) LRSPMS0001 / 11214205 5
River Trail to downtown at the Sundial Bridge Drive Bridge across SR 44 (South of the intersection of Sundial Bridge Drive and SR 44 Westbound Off-ramp).

III. Other Projects
a. Trinity Street Bikeway Project
i. Proposed Cycle track along Trinity Street, South on Continental Street and East on Butte Street (becomes Park Marina Dr) ii. This will connect to the Sacramento River trail once the Sundial Bridge Drive cycle track is constructed.

1. City is doing due diligent analysis before
implementing cycle tracks.

2. Bike signals are not included in downtown for
now.
b. Sundial Bridge Drive improvements around Redding Civic Auditorium i. Tighten up and raise (vertically) the intersection of Sundial Bridge Drive toward the parking lot and Sundial Bridge Drive toward Sheraton Redding Hotel.
ii. North leg of the intersection will be one-way traffic. This will be part of a loop that will increase circulation when there are events at the Auditorium.
c. Other raised intersection in Downtown.
d. Shelby Nadin (City of Redding) will send GHD the HSIP applications, ATP applications and plans associated with planned and proposed safety related projects.

K. School related Issues
I. There is only way in and out for Boulder Creek Elementary School (through Whistling Drive) so there is a lot of traffic nearby
II. Turtle Bay School is the most populated campus on the west side of Redding a. Several mitigation projects but still poses some issues L. Priority list of locations
I. Beside the number of collisions, top locations are also identified based on Equivalent Property Damage Only (EPDO) scale. EPDO weights locations based on collision severity as well as number of collisions.

II. Locations with collision history can also be ranked based on collision rates. This process will normalize the number of collisions based on the daily traffic.

III. Top Study Intersections
a. Churn Creek Road at Hartnell Avenue is the top intersection in term of EPDO and total collisions.
b. Cypress at Hilltop had red-light enforcement project (around 2012) which helped to bring it lower down on the list
i. Highest volume intersection in Redding
IV. Top Study Segments
a. Churn Creek Road from Presidio to S Bonnyview Road is top segment i. During the meeting, this segment was identified incorrectly as Churn Creek Road from Presidio to Dana Drive.

M. Countermeasure Development
I. Comprehensive approach will be applied which incorporates systemic and hot spot approach.

II. Proven Countermeasures
a. Caltrans has a list of countermeasures (published in the Local Road Safety Manual (LRSM)) that can be funded by the HSIP.

Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) LRSPMS0001 / 11214205 6
III. Leading Pedestrian Intervals
a. John Abshier (City of Redding Public Works) has provided GHD with a list of six city intersections with leading ped interval (LPI).

N. Vision, Goals and Priorities
I. Members of the LRSP working group will coordinate with Kathy Kleinschmidt (GHD) in forming vision, goals and missions. Example of vision goals and mission are shown below
a. Vision:
i. Toward Vision Zero – The aim is to eliminate all traffic fatalities and severe injuries, while increasing safe, healthy and equitable mobility for all.
ii. Working together in creating a comprehensive roadway safety plan that encourages improved safety for all users, whether it is walking, biking and driving – because every person in our community matters.
b. Goal example:
i. Strive to achieve zero deaths and life altering injuries on local roadways
ii. Increase safety with roadway infrastructure improvements iii. Identify countermeasures to correlate to emphasis areas (5 – E’s)
iv. Increase walking, biking, rolling (wheelchair, skateboard, scoter, etc.) to downtown district, to work and to school)
c. Mission example:
i. Redding will provide a safe and sustainable multimodal transportation system for all users of the public roadways in the City of Redding.

II. Performance measures should be specific, measureable, achievable, relevant and time constrained (SMART).

III. Mitigation strategies should correlate with challenge areas.

O. Public Outreach
I. Social Pinpoint Website
a. City prefers sooner rather than later to launch website

3. Next Steps
A. Finalize Vision, goals and mission
B. The report will be a living document that will be update periodically C. GHD will compile current and planned safety projects D. GHD will Develop Safety Projects
I. Benefit/ Cost analysis based on HSIP analyzer
II. Will be ready for the next HSIP Cycle
E. Website will be made publically available after review from City staff.

I. Public outreach results will be presented at the next meeting F. Next LRSP meeting will be virtual near the beginning of 2021.

List of Attendees

1. Shelby Nadin – Associate Engineer, City of Redding

2. John Abshier – Assistant Director of Public Works, City of Redding

3. Mark Montgomery – Sergeant, Redding Police Department

4. Jesse Solorio – Traffic Operations Engineer, Caltrans

5. John Heath – Associate Engineer, Shasta County Public Works Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) LRSPMS0001 / 11214205 7

6. Robert Fellinger – Chief Business Official, Redding Unified School District

7. Sara Sundquist – Healthy Shasta Coordinator, Healthy Shasta Partnership and Shasta County Health and Human Services

8. Sean Tiedgen – Shasta Regional Transportation Agency

9. Kathy Kleinschmidt – Project Manager, GHD

10. Farid Rahman – Transportation Engineer, GHD

11. Emily Darke – Transportation Engineer, GHD
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Meeting Summary
GHD
669 Pacific Street Suite A San Luis Obispo California 93401 United States T +1 805 242 0461 W www.ghd.com
May 3, 2021
To: Shelby Nadin Project: City of Redding Local Road Safety Plan (LRSP)

From: Kathy Kleinschmidt Ref/Job No.: 11215289
CC: Emily Darke File No.: LRSPMS002.docx
Subject: Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) Meeting #2 Summary – May 3, 2021 The following is GHD’s understanding of the discussions and decisions for the above referenced meeting. Please notify GHD of any discrepancies in the information recorded.

This meeting record has been prepared to serve as documentation for the virtual meeting conducted on May 3, 2021 via Microsoft Teams platform. A PowerPoint presentation was used to focus the discussion.

All participants attending virtually, no sign-in sheet was circulated. Rather, the list of attendees will be provided at the end of this document.

1. Introductions
a. Safety Champion/Project Manager for the City – Shelby Nadin b. LRSP stakeholder group members

2. Summary of 1st Stakeholder Meeting
a. Meeting Summary
i. Challenge/Emphasis areas

1. Pedestrians

2. Distracted Driving

3. Bicyclists

4. Intersections

5. Impaired Driving

6. Speeding (associated with Aggressive Driving)

7. Add ‘Roadway Design’
ii. Collision analysis
iii. Projects in the City
b. Vision, Mission, and Goals
i. Sent form to stakeholders to provide input

3. Recent Developments
a. Review of collision analysis
i. Top violation category was unsafe speed

1. Many of these collisions resulted in rear ends

2. Usually the default primary collision for rear ends with police department ii. Input from fire department

1. Priorities
a. Road widths
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) LRSPMS002 / 11215289 2
b. Ability to get around obstacles (mountable curbs, etc.) c. Traffic calming devices
d. Roads in high fire hazard severity zones
i. To evacuate during a wildfire event

2. City does not currently have a largescale evacuation plan a. In progress

3. Heatmap of collisions
a. Look into collision density in relation to collision rates b. Public website engagement
i. Summarized interactive map comments

1. ACID canal request for multi-use paths are known to the City a. Difficult to do since it is different agency

2. Magnolia neighborhood has come up in recent conversations a. City has had requests for more projects on west side of town

3. Congestion at E Cypress Ave at I-5 ramps
a. Difficult intersection
b. Timed recently
c. Would benefit from a 2nd northbound lane on on-ramp
d. Proposal was previously considered along corridor for signage/striping

4. Crossing for pedestrians Buenaventura at Lakeside
a. In safety lighting project
b. Nothing specific to pedestrian crossings

5. Traffic circles on Shasta St
a. Many questions when they first went in
b. Potentially related to student drivers
i. High school is in close proximity

6. Lake Blvd at Keswick Dam has design for traffic signal a. Been looking at funding to complete the project

7. Sidewalks near Hartnell and Alta Mesa
a. Big project to connect discontinuous sidewalks at pinch point ii. Summarized survey results

1. Primary safety concern from public was a lack of infrastructure

2. Residents preferred shared use paths for bicyclists

3. Most people were familiar with ATP and HSIP projects and wanted to learn more
a. Have mailing list from people who responded
i. Can reach out to people who wanted more information

4. Most people might be willing to use alternate modes of travel iii. Other comments from the public

1. Concern about safety along Palisades Ave

2. No current plans to make improvements

3. Many people spend time at trailhead

4. Was sometimes confused with on-ramp to I-5

5. Seems to be a few specific drivers that frequent this area c. Safety projects in the City
i. HSIP Cycle 10 projects
ii. ATP Cycle 5 projects

1. Will likely be constructed around 2024-2026

2. Design will start this year
iii. South Redding Bikeway and Pedestrian Trail Project Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) LRSPMS002 / 11215289 3

1. Could potentially add pedestrian fencing along roadway or additional enforcement
a. Between bridge and casino entrance

4. Safety Projects
a. Methodology
b. Priority locations
c. Recommended countermeasures
i. Priority intersections

1. Most signal heads have been updated to 12”

2. Most pedestrian signals have countdown timers
a. Working through incrementally to get these replaced

3. City has advance dilemma zone for high-speed approaches

4. Decision was previously made by the City to not install retroreflective tape
a. City runs on its own power

5. Consider alternate routes as a countermeasure
a. Sometimes the improvements can funnel active transportation in areas that are not as desirable as alternate routes
b. Can view data for bike/pedestrian routes in the City c. SRAT hired a travel data collection company
i. Around 30 active transportation video counts around the City
ii. Under contract to do these counts in intervals in the next few years
ii. Priority segments

1. Bechelli Ln has ATP project to add bike lanes and reduce area for vehicles
a. Around 1 more year until construction
b. From Cypress to S Bonnyview Rd

2. Hartnell Avenue curvature
a. Considered HSIP project but couldn’t find one that would be competitive
b. Might be good bike corridor
i. Parallels SR 44 and connects to development
d. Potential funding sources for projects
i. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP)

1. Benefit-to-cost ratio projects

2. Set-aside funding
ii. Active Transportation Program (ATP)
e. Non-engineering safety projects
i. Education

1. Agencies to partner with
a. Information Gatekeepers, Shasta Living Streets, Public Health Department
ii. Emerging Technologies

1. Automatic bicycle/pedestrian counters
a. City has current vehicle counters from decades ago but not utilized often
iii. Enforcement
iv. Emergency Response
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) LRSPMS002 / 11215289 4

1. Speed tables don’t dramatically affect response times and are not as harsh on equipment

5. LRSP Timeframe
a. Living document that is updated as needed
b. Official update every 5 years
c. LRSP schedule for completion
i. Final LRSP around June/July 2021

6. Next Steps
a. Provide input on vision, mission, and goals
b. Dan will provide shapefile of areas with disadvantaged communities to overlay over areas with recent/upcoming/proposed projects
c. Continue to share the LRSP website with the public
d. Review of draft LRSP document
List of Attendees

1. Shelby Nadin – Associate Engineer, City of Redding

2. John Abshier – Assistant Director of Public Works, City of Redding

3. Craig Wittner – Fire Marshal, Redding Fire Department

4. Jesse Solorio – Traffic Operations Engineer, Caltrans

5. Robert Fellinger – Chief Business Official, Redding Unified School District

6. Sara Sundquist – Healthy Shasta Coordinator, Healthy Shasta Partnership and Shasta County Health and Human Services

7. Michael Kuker – Associate Transportation Planner, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency

8. Dan Wayne – Senior Planner, Shasta Regional Transportation Agency

9. Kathy Kleinschmidt – GHD

10. Emily Darke – GHD
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Interactive Map Comments
ID Created on Type Comment Response to Comment
1 3/26/2021 9:13 Biking Comment
Bridge shoulders need to be swept more frequently and thoroughly. Also, the fog line has worn away almost completely. It would be easy to restripe and maybe even add bike lane buffers This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 2 3/26/2021 9:14 Driving Comment Congestion occurs during peak periods. Recommend installing a roundabout Related to congestion at the intersection of Hartnell Ave at Alta Mesa Dr. 3 3/26/2021 9:15 Driving Comment Congestion occurs during peak periods. Recommend installing a roundabout Related to congestion at the intersection of Old Alturas Rd at Victor Ave.4 3/26/2021 9:18 Driving Comment The (arguably) worst congestion in Redding occurs near the I-5/Cypress Ave interchange. Are there any long-term improvements planned? Related to congestion at the US 101 interchange at Cypress Ave.5 3/26/2021 11:44 Biking Comment This area would be idea for a multiuse path. There are many families who live in Stillwater Heights that attend Columbia School (and would like to go to the Big League).

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 6 3/26/2021 11:45 Pedestrian Comment Improve access to EHS for residents through back of school to avoid traffic at front of school. Related to traffic flow near Enterprise High School.7 3/26/2021 11:50 Biking Comment Difficult for bikes to trigger signal and cross Market esp heading eastbound. Signal does not have a protected left. Consider adding sign/sharrow or other improvements for bikes heading westbound up CA street hill.

Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 273 at California St). 8 3/26/2021 11:52 Biking Comment a path through this area would be idea to get people from Magnolia neighborhood over to Airpark/Gold to head to hospital area and downtown. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.9 3/26/2021 11:55 Biking Comment Signalized crossing of some sort would help bikes, peds, drivers and school traffic. This area preferred over Sunset Terrace for signal as this area lacks site distance, has high speeds, and trail access is close (trail to Manzanita) and River Trail on south side of 299. Could be a great connection for a great deal of students (Shasta, Pioneer, Uprep, Manzanita, Coop...) Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 299 at Overhill Dr). 10 3/26/2021 11:57 Pedestrian Comment
Unsafe to cross with high speeds, multiple lanes esp peak traffic hours. Lots of school time traffic. Many residents (along Buenaventura and Lakeside subdivision) like to walk/bike to Mary Lake and Westside trails. many drive as they do not feel safe driving. One of my neighbors moved to Mary Lake because he didn't like crossing Buenaventura for his daily morning walks.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 11 3/26/2021 11:58 Biking Comment Lots of gravel in Bike Lane due to buffered bike lane. Needs to be swept to curb on a more frequent basis. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.12 3/26/2021 12:00 Pedestrian Comment Well defined goat path here. Residents living off Starlight walk/bike to market. Would be nice to define this multiuse path (lots of goat heads as a goat path!) No good for bikes (rocky and goat heads).

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 13 3/26/2021 12:03 Biking Comment
K rail is put in odd spots for bikes to enter/exit roadway block to eliminate cut through traffic. It's also poorly maintained and feels unsafe. I don't think it is unsafe, it feels unsafe and could be improved through art, paint, landscaping to make this an incredible bike way with low traffic. Low hanging fruit, good neighborhood/Juniper School project! This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 14 3/26/2021 12:06 Biking Comment ACID Canal would make an amazing bike path for N/S commuters and kids going to school (Sequoia, Cypress, Bonney View, Sycamore - and schools in Anderson) This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.15 3/26/2021 12:08 Driving Comment Intersection is huge. Difficult for all users. Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 273 at S Bonnyview Rd).16 3/26/2021 12:09 Biking Comment High Speeds for regular bike lane. Needs multiuse path or alternative route for cyclists. Will get busier when Costco comes. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.17 3/30/2021 7:26 Biking Comment It would be nice to see more frequent maintenance of the eastbound bike lane, the roadside vegetation encroaches into the lane reducing the usable width for cyclists. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.18 3/30/2021 7:38 Biking Comment The westbound bike lane on South Bonnyview ends at Eastside Road. It would be nice to have bike facilities continue on South Bonnyview to Cedars Road. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.

Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) ID Created on Type Comment Response to Comment
19 3/30/2021 7:40 Biking Comment There is a Bike Route sign on Cedars at Westside Road. It would be nice to link this bike route with the bike lanes on South Bonnyview Road This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.20 3/30/2021 7:41 Biking Comment This is a challenging Intersection for westbound cyclists Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 273 at S Bonnyview Rd).21 3/30/2021 15:40 Biking Comment No bike lane or pedestrian walkway advailable. Please develop such a path on this stretch of road. Unsafe road for bicyclists and pedestrians. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.22 4/12/2021 14:06 Driving Comment Generally a confusing intersection - sensors don't get tripped, road gets blocked, cars turn on red at wrong time. I do not know what needs to be done to fix this intersection, but I know it's an extremely frustrating and potentially dangerous one.

Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 273 at Breslauer Way). 23 4/16/2021 22:54 Driving Comment
It's not that I do not appreciate having traffic circles in my neighborhood. It is that others are unaware of the right of way in a traffic circle. So many times I've had to slam on my brakes as I'm making a left turn already in the intersection as someone tries to beat me to go straight through the intersection. Too many close calls to count. If the city was able to inform/educate the public 0 maybe there won't be so many incidents in these areas.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 24 4/17/2021 10:43 Driving Comment I have seen too many close calls at this intersection. There needs to be traffic lights here. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.25 4/28/2021 16:09 Pedestrian Comment This area really needs a sidewalk, or at the very least grade it and make it easier for people to walk, push a baby carriage or use a wheel chair. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.26 4/28/2021 17:53 Pedestrian Comment Need sidewalks on this street and bike lanes as well. Very unsafe. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.27 4/29/2021 7:23 Driving Comment Very foolish to close this major street. During the Carr fire, it was a vitally important escape route. Hard to figure out why this shortsighted decision was made.

How should the response to the clossure of Riverside Dr be phrased? 28 4/29/2021 17:26 Driving Comment
Cars turning left onto Rancho Rd have very fast traffic coming around a blind curve from Churn Creek Rd. Have witnessed many close calls. Anyone unfamiliar with the road and the traffic is greatly at risk of a serious injury accident at this intersection as well as those who are familiar as well.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 29 4/30/2021 8:13 Driving Comment Congested intersection due to commuter traffic and pedestrian traffic. Traffic light skips Airpark Dr. frequently. Related to congestion at the intersection of Placer St at Airpark Dr. 30 5/7/2021 16:25 Driving Comment Lanes seem too narrow for most cars. I have witnessed so many drivers driving over the white lines because they look too close to other vehicles. The area around the E Cypress Ave bridge has been identified as a priority location in the Local Road Safety Plan. Countermeasures for this location are presented in the plan.31 5/8/2021 8:39 Driving Comment Too much drag racing and speeding done on Goodwater Ave, endangers children walking &amp; waiting at the numerous bus stops for elementary and high school students and pedestrians on walks or bike rides with children. One house on this road fence was damaged from car racing. Recommend several speed bumps be placed to discourage speeding and racing vehicles. Including Freeman Way which has the same problems and many families.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 32 5/14/2021 21:38 Driving Comment
Freebridge at Smile is desperately in need of a STOP Sign. Either a 4 Way stop or Stop signes on Freebridge Entering Freebridge from Russel to Smile making a left or a right turn is dangerous and has blind spots of seeing traffic coming at a high rate of speed from the south on Freebridge and also from Parkview heading South on Freebridge.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 33 5/14/2021 21:43 Driving Comment
Turning from Eureka way, left onto Almond at night is confusing and dangerous because there is no street light. This is exacerbated by the lights of East bound traffic on Eureka way.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.

Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) ID Created on Type Comment Response to Comment
34 5/17/2021 9:39 Biking Comment
Old Alturas Bridge lacks proper bike lanes requiring bikes and cars to share the lane. Traffic travels at high speeds in this corridor. This narrow bridge is my biggest safety concern when biking to and from work (Shasta View to Downtown). Replacing the bridge and providing adequate facilities would be a huge improvement. Better yet, would be a multi-use path on the north side of Old Alturas from Shasta View Drive to Browning Street.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 35 5/17/2021 12:59 Driving Comment Lots of congestion on Shasta View between 44 and Hartnell. Road should be widened with bike lanes and sidewalk improvements. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 36 5/17/2021 12:59 Driving Comment Lots of congestion on Victor between 44 and Cypress. Road should be widened with bike lanes and sidewalk improvements. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.37 5/17/2021 13:01 Driving Comment Double signal at Mistletoe and 44, always causes backups. Recommend installing very large roundabout to cover the close intersection of all the roads. Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 44 at Mistletoe Ln).38 5/17/2021 13:03 Driving Comment Left turn onto Airport Road or left turn onto 44 westbound ramp can be difficult during peak traffic times. Consider intersection improvements such as a roundabout.

Related to roadway under Caltrans jurisdiction (SR 44 at Airport Rd). 39 6/17/2021 15:11 Driving Comment
When trying to turn left here onto Gold, it's often difficult to judge whether or not a car will be going straight onto California or turning left onto Gold. It would be great if there was a definitive way to tell the difference.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 40 6/17/2021 15:13 Driving Comment
Twice in the past 2 weeks I've been in the far right lane to turn right and had another car to the right of me use the bike lane. Typically this means they are parking, but two separate drivers appear to have been confused and then tried to get into the lane I was in.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 41 6/17/2021 15:14 Driving Comment It would be great if the stop signs here became permanent. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.42 6/17/2021 16:47 Pedestrian Comment This section of Old Alturas is dangerous for pedestrians and bikers. The bridge is too narrow as well as the shoulders on both sides of the street. Intersection of Old Alturas and Victor begs for a roundabout.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 43 6/18/2021 6:58 Biking Comment Bike lanes don't continue to Rancho Road. Plenty of room to add white lines. This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan. 44 6/18/2021 7:01 Biking Comment
This stretch of road has very small shoulder. It would be great if road could be expanded in this stretch from Victor to I5 so I could ride to work and the grocery store.

This suggestion is recorded in the "Public Suggestions" table in the Local Road Safety Plan.

Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Appendix C – Previous
Safety Plans and Projects
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) 9 2
1 8
12 17
13 10
3 11
18 14
13 16
5 5
15 5
6 6
6 6
6 6
7 6
5 7
6 6
6 7
6 6
6 7
7 6
7 7
6 7
6 4
6 6
7 FIGURE C.1
0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2
Miles
Project No.

Revision No. -
11215289
Date 03/11/2021
Map Projection: Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Horizontal Datum: WGS 1984
Grid: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Auxiliary Sphere
Paper Size ANSI B
o Data source: Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) 2015-2019, Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, Intermap, increment P Corp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeoBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community. Created by: edarke N:\US\San Luis Obispo\Projects\561\11215289\GIS\Maps\Working\Upcoming Safety Projects.mxd Print date: 11 Mar 2021 - 15:18
Legend
Project Type
ATP, Cycle 1
ATP, Cycle 2
ATP, Cycle 3
ATP, Cycle 5
HSIP, Cycle 6
HSIP, Cycle 7
HSIP, Cycle 8
HSIP, Cycle 9
HSIP, Cycle 10

ASHC/STI
Section 130
City CIP
City of Redding
City Limit

CITY OF REDDING

LOCAL ROAD SAFETY PLAN (LRSP)

CURRENT/UPCOMING SAFETY

PROJECTS IN THE CITY OF REDDING

CITY OF

REDDING
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Safety Projects in Progress/Recently Completed in the City of Redding City Roadways
Prj ID Project Funding Year Progress Name Location Improvements 1 ATP, Cycle 3 May-20 In design West Street Area School Safety Improvement Project
West St, 7th St, 8th St, 9th St, 10th St,
Magnolia Ave
Curb and gutter improvements, curb bulb-outs, pedestrian improvements, installing RRFB, adding bicycle markings, buffered bike lane, installing lighting
2 HSIP, Cycle 6 Oct-18 In design Old Oregon Trail Widening Old Oregon Trail from Paso Robles Ave to Bear Mountain Rd Widening roadway
3 ASHC/STI Nov-20 In design Trinity Street Bikeway Project Trinity St, S on Continental St, E on Butte St Installing buffered cycle track, installing green conflict paint 4 Section 130 Jun-20 Construction
this year
Shasta Street R.R. Crossing
Improvements Project Shasta St at Railroad Crossing Pedestrian improvements at railroad crossing 5 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Protected Left Turn Project Court St (Shasta St to Butte St) Micro-surfacing, striping improvements 5 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Protected Left Turn Project South St (Railroad Crossing to SR 273) Striping improvements, ADA curb return upgrades, micro-surfacing 5 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Protected Left Turn Project Placer St (Market St to Continental St) Microsurfacing, striping improvements, ADA curb return upgrades 5 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Protected Left Turn Project Butte St at Continental St Micro-surfacing, striping improvements, installation of new traffic signal pole and mast arm, ADA curb return upgrade
6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Beltline Rd at Mountain Lakes Blvd Install new intersection lighting on Beltline Rd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Lake Blvd at Wilmington Way Install new intersection lighting on Lake Blvd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Lake Blvd at Keswick Dam Rd Install new intersection lighting on Keswick Dam Rd and Lake Blvd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Lake Blvd at Magnums Way Install new intersection lighting on Magnums Way 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Buenaventura Blvd at Lakeside Dr Install new intersection lighting on Buenaventura Blvd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Hilltop Dr at Industrial St Install new intersection lighting on Hilltop Dr and Industrial St 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Churn Creek Rd at Harpole Rd Install new intersection lighting on Churn Creek Rd and Harpole Rd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Shasta View Dr at Christian Ave Install new intersection lighting on Shasta View Dr and Christian Ave
6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Shasta View Dr at Wilson Ave Install new intersection lighting on 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Shasta View Dr at Hawn Ave Install new intersection lighting on Shasta View Dr at Hawn Ave 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Shasta View Dr at Alden Ave Install new intersection lighting on Alden Ave at Shasta View Dr 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Shasta View Galaxy Way Install new intersection lighting on Galaxy Way 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Rancho Rd at Alta Mesa Dr Install new intersection lighting on Rancho Rd and Alta Mesa Dr 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Rancho Rd at Alta Camino Dr Install new intersection lighting on Rancho Rd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Rancho Rd at Alta Rico Rd Install new intersection lighting on Rancho Rd at Alta Rico Dr 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Rancho Rd at Saratoga Dr Install new intersection lighting on Saratoga Dr and Rancho Rd 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Rancho Rd at Goodwater Ave Install new intersection lighting on Rancho Rd and Goodwater Ave 6 HSIP, Cycle 10 Oct-20 Funded Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Rancho Rd at Persistence Ln Install new intersection lighting on Rancho Rd and Persistence Ln 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Placer St at West St New striping and crosswalk markings, ADA upgrades, RRFBs, advance warning signage 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Gold St at Court St New striping and crosswalk markings, detectable warning surface upgrades, RRFBs, refuge island/concrete median 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Parkview Ave at State St ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance warning signage, refuge island/concrete median
7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Hilltop Dr at Sandpoint Dr ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance warning signage 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Churn Creek St at Palacio Dr ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance warning signage 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Browning St at Lancers Ln ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance warning signage, new lighting 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Old Alturas Rd at Bradford Way
New striping and crosswalk markings, detectable warning surface upgrades, RRFBs, ADA upgrades, refuge island/concrete median, new lighting, advance warning signage
7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Churn Creek Rd at Michael Ln ADA upgrades, RRFBs, new striping and crosswalk markings, advance warning signage, new lighting 7 HSIP, Cycle 9 Aug-18 In design Systemic Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements Saturn Skyway at Shasta View Dr
New striping and crosswalk markings, detectable warning surface upgrades, RRFBs, ADA upgrades, refuge island/concrete median, advance warning signage
8 City CIP Apr-19 Constructed Airport Road Improvement Project Airport Rd (Billy Jean Ln to Electro Way) Road widening 9 ATP, Cycle 3 Jun-16 In design Bechelli & Loma Vista Corridor Improvements Bechelli Ln, Loma Vista Ave
Construction of a mix of buffered bike lanes, separated bike lanes, sidewalks, accessible driveways, curb ramps, enhanced crossings with rapid flashing beacons, pedestrian refuge islands, pedestrian safety amenities including safety lighting, and functional landscaping including shade trees and buffers from traffic. 10 HSIP, Cycle 7 Mar-20 In
construction
Hartnell Avenue Safety
Improvement Project
Hartnell Ave from Churn Creek Rd to
East Way
Striping improvements, ADA upgrades, lighting improvements.

Install raised median.
11 ATP, Cycle 2 Jun-20 Construction
this year
Diestelhort to Downtown NonMotorized Improvement Diestelhort to Downtown Signage and striping improvements, install RRFBs, buffered bike lanes,
12 ATP, Cycle 1 May-15 Completed Placer Street Improvements Placer St (S of Boston Ave to Mesa St) Sidewalk and curb improvements, signage and striping improvements, signal modifications
13 ATP, Cycle 2 Jan-18 Completed Quartz Hill Road Improvements Quartz Hill Rd (S of Terra Nova St to Brenton Dr) Road widening, pedestrian crossing improvements Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Prj ID Project Funding Year Progress Name Location Improvements 13 ATP, Cycle 2 Jan-18 Completed Quartz Hill Road Improvements Quartz Hill Rd (W of Delta St to SR 273) Pedestrian crossing improvements 14 HSIP, Cycle 8 Sep-20 Construction
this year
Churn Creek Rd & Maraglia St
Safety Improvements
Churn Creek (E Cypress to Hartnell),
Maraglia
Curb ramp improvements, additional lighting, striping
improvements
15 ASHC/STI Dec-18
In design but
applied for
more $
California Street Bikeway California St (Eureka Way to Yuba St) Construction of two-way Class IV bikeway and pedestrian access improvements along California Street, between Division Street and Yuba Street.
16 ATP, Cycle 5 Jul-20 Funded Turtle Bay to Downtown Gap Completion Project Turtle Bay
Buffered 2-way cycle track; shared use path; raised intersection with curb extensions, bollards, lane reductions; raised crosswalks with bike/ped separations; and shade trees.
17 ATP, Cycle 5 Jul-20 Funded Victor Ave & Cypress Ave Active Transportation
Victor Ave (s/o Hartnell Ave to Cypress
Ave), Cypress Ave (Victor Ave to Alfreda
Way), Alfreda Way (Cypress Ave to Del
Monte St)
Along Victor Ave, Cypress Ave, and Alfreda Way, construct shared use paths, sidewalks, curb/gutter/curb ramps, bike lanes, and protected intersections.
18 Section 130 Oct-20 Construction
this year
Girvan Road Railroad Crossing
Improvements and South Redding
Bikeway Pedestrian Trail Project
SR 273, Westside Rd, Girvan Rd,
Eastside Rd Bicycle and pedestrian crossing improvements Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Appendix D – Recommended
Projects
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Priority Intersection Characteristics
Intersection
EPDO
Total Crashes
Crash Rate
Intersection Type
Top Type of Collision
(Number of Collisions)
Top Violation Category
(Number of Collisions)
Night
Wet
Ped
Bike
Involv. w/Fixed Object
Crosing Not in
Crosswalk
DUI
Churn Creek Rd / Hartnell Ave 1223 32 0.4265 Signalized Rear End (21) Unsafe Speed (13) 13 4 2 1 1 0 7 South St / California St 588 10 - Signalized Broadside (6) Traffic Signals and Signs (5) 2121101
Hartnell Ave / Bechelli Ln 587 9 0.1613 Signalized Hit Object (4) Unsafe Speed
(2)/Other Than Driver
(or Pedestrian) (2)
3121311
Airport Rd / Preserve Blvd 562 4 0.1809 Signalized Rear End (2)/ Broadside (2) N/A (all unique) 2001001
Butte St / Continental St 562 4 0.2300 Signalized N/A (all unique)
Other Hazardous
Violation (2) 0012000
Market St / Riverside Dr 551 3 - Signalized N/A (all
unique) N/A (all unique) 2110111
Hartnell Ave / Northwoods Way 544 1 0.0363 Signalized Broadside (1) DUI/BUI (1) 1100001 Churn Creek Rd / E Cypress Ave 169 29 0.4752 Signalized Broadside (12) Traffic Signals and Signs (7) 10 1 1 1 2 0 5
Victor Ave / Hartnell Ave 151 22 0.3742 Signalized Rear End (10) Unsafe Speed (7) 13 12 2 2 1 1 6 Hilltop Dr / E Cypress Ave 127 22 0.3174 Signalized Rear End (11) Unsafe Speed (10) 9401305 E Cypress Ave / Bechelli Ln 85 20 0.2977 Signalized Rear End (10) Unsafe Speed (9) 3311102 Priority Segment Characteristics
Road Name
EPDO
Total Crashes
Crash Rate
Length
Top Type of Collision
(Number of Collisions)
Top Violation Category
(Number of Collisions)
Night
Wet
Ped
Crossing Not in
Crosswalk
Bike
Involv. w/Fixed Object
DUI
Churn Creek Rd (Presidio St to S
Bonnyview Rd) 1021 73 0.5606 3.11 Broadside (21) Automobile Right of Way (21) 23 9 5 2 5 18 13
E Cypress Ave (Park Marina Dr to
Churn Creek Rd) 876 51 0.7648 1.12 Broadside (24) Automobile Right of Way (17) 10 8 4 2 5 4 4
Hilltop Dr (n/o Browning St to
Maraglia St) 835 45 0.4574 1.86 Broadside (12) Automobile Right of Way (11) 15 7 5 4 3 13 15
Bechelli Ln (E Cypress Ave to n/o
3rd St) 711 29 1.5918 0.84 Broadside (14) Automobile Right of Way (7) 6111423
W Cypress Ave (Market St to Park
Marina Dr) 657 15 0.5404 0.72
Hit Object
(4)/Vehicle
Pedestrian (4)
Unsafe Speed (4) 6342244
Railroad Ave (South St to
Buenaventura Blvd) 651 10 0.3758 1.8 Broadside (3) N/A (all unique) 4121021 Hartnell Ave (Goodwater Ave to
Airport Rd) 618 7 - 0.87 Hit Object (3) DUI/BUI (5) 4100055 Hilltop Dr (North of Hilltop Dr to
St Thomas Pkwy) 604 11 0.6606 0.65 Broadside (5) Automobile Right of Way (3) 5011112
Hartnell Ave (Northwoods Way to
Kenco Ave) 193 30 0.8571 0.94 Broadside (11) Automobile Right of Way (10) 9664244
S Bonnyview Rd (S Market St to
Churn Creek Rd) 163 25 0.2074 2.01 Hit Object (8) Unsafe Speed (8) 7 4 0 0 3 10 7 Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Priority Intersection Mitigations
Intersection Focus Area
Countermeasure
Number
CRF
Recommended Countermeasures Reasoning
Impaired Driving - - Increase DUI enforcement 7 DUI collisions.

S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
21 rear end and 4 broadside collsions.

S03 15% Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation)
2 study intersections and 1 study
segment on Churn Creek Rd.
- - Consolidate driveways Multiple driveways in close proximity to intersection.

Pedestrians S21PB 60% Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
2 pedestrian collisions. At commercial
district and near Mr Shasta Mall.

S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
6 broadside collisions.

S03 15% Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation) Located in downtown.

S06 55% Install left-turn lane and add turn phase
6 broadside collisions. No current left
turn lane or phase on north leg of
California St.

Pedestrians S21PB 60% Modify signal phasing to implement a Leading Pedestrian Interval (LPI)
2 pedestrian collisions. Located in
downtown.

S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
2 rear end collisions.

S03 15% Improve signal timing (coordination,
phases, red, yellow, or operation)
2 study intersections and 1 study
segment on Hartnell Ave.

S04 40% Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone
Detection
2 rear end collisons. Nearest
intersection is around 0.5mi away.

Pedestrians S13PB 35% Install pedestrian median fencing on approaches
2 pedestrian collisions. Fatal pedestrian
collision due to the pedestrian entering
traffic, not in a crosswalk.

S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
2 rear end and 2 broadside collisions.

S04 40% Provide Advanced Dilemma-Zone
Detection
2 rear end and 2 broadside collisions. In
rural area. Nearest signalized
intersection around 1 mi away.

S20PB 15% Install advance stop bar before
crosswalk (Bicycle Box)
2 bicycle collisions. No bike
accomodations at intersection.
-- Bicycle education about riding at night
and rules of the road
2 bicycle collisions. Fatal collision was at
night from bike improperly turning west
while vehicle was proceeding south.

Butte St /
Continental St - --
Pedestrians S18PB 25% Install pedestrian crossing (S.I.) 1 fatal pedestrian collision due to
pedestrian crossing not at crosswalk. No
pedestrian crossing on north leg.

Intersections S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
1 fatal broadside collision.

Impaired Driving - - Increase DUI enforcement 1 fatal collision due to DUI.

Intersections
Intersections
Intersections
Churn Creek Rd /
Hartnell Ave
Market St /
Riverside Dr
Intersections
None (upcoming safety project addresses current collision trends) Bicyclists
South St /
California St
Airport Rd /
Preserve Blvd
Hartnell Ave /
Bechelli Ln
Hartnell Ave /
Northwoods Way
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: 021522 LRSP Staff Report (4.11(e)--Accept Safe Routes For All (SS4A) Funds) Intersection Focus Area
Countermeasure
Number
CRF
Recommended Countermeasures Reasoning
S02 15%
Improve signal hardware: lenses, backplates with retroreflective borders, mounting, size, and number
12 broadside and 6 rear end collisions.