Currently, the Redding Redevelopment Agency (RRA) owns an approximately 112-acre parcel located at 850 Quartz Hill Drive (APN 115-170-001). The City has identified this parcel for the development of a minimum 120-lot residential subdivision. The goal of the project is to obtain a developer to facilitate the design construction of the subdivision and to eventually construct the single-family residences.
The subject parcel currently does not have access to Quartz Hill Road or Buenaventura Boulevard. The only existing access is from the River Ridge Terrace subdivision to the east at Steamboat Street and Keel Court. The project site is currently encumbered by Western Area Power Administration (WAPA) transmission infrastructure, green space, steep terrain, and City sewer infrastructure easements. The parcel contains no regulatory floodplains but has two drainage courses flowing west to east into a 42-inch culvert, which runs across Spinnaker Drive north of Keel Court. The subject parcel is located in both the north Redding and Clear Creek sewer service areas, with a 10-inch gravity sewer main routed through the north third of the site. An 8-inch gravity sewer main is also routed along the southern property line of the project. The site has access to City water infrastructure at Steamboat Street and Keel Court. Based on preliminary site investigations, the project area is likely composed of rocky subgrade, which will increase the difficulty and time required for excavations.
Per the Request for Proposal (RFP), the selected developer must have the financial health to cover upfront expenses, with the understanding that they will be reimbursed by the City at regular intervals via the grant funds. As the project is being funded by public funds, prevailing wage rates are required per federal and state labor code requirements.
After completion of subdivision infrastructure, the developer may be retained to complete housing build out. Per the grant requirements, a minimum of 51% of the resulting parcels will be reserved for LMIs making 80% or below the median income for the area. The remaining parcels may be developed Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
2 and sold at market rate. The City will require restrictive covenants on the 51% of parcels earmarked as workforce housing units (WHUs).
The immediate goal of the City is to use the grant funds to build infrastructure that will result in an increase in the amount of available housing, provide new recreational opportunities, and improve traffic flow in the area during times of emergency. The ultimate goal is to develop a new community in northern Redding that promotes a neighborhood feel rather than a tract-home approach. To accomplish this, the City would like to intersperse WHUs with market rate housing so they would be indistinguishable from each other.
PROJECT APPROACH
Ridgeline Builders Group, Inc. (Ridgeline) (i.e., developer) and PACE Engineering, Inc. (PACE) are proposing to partner with the City to build the Copper Heights subdivision, which will be a creative, environmentally sensitive, and recreation-focused development. It will not only meet the requirements of the grant but will also enhance this area of northern Redding. While the grant has identified 120 lots as the goal, we will attempt to add as many lots in addition to the required amount as the available funding will allow. We have identified the key issues of this project as follows:
1. Grant timeline to have work completed by 2025.
2. Limited access to the subject parcel from City roadways.
3. Increasing vehicular access in the greater area to address congestion concerns during natural disasters.
4. Increasing recreational opportunities in the area.
5. Steep terrain and drainages in the development.
6. Existing utility infrastructure easements.
7. Construction resources availability.
The key issue this project is facing is the schedule. The Scope of Work proposed is aggressive, and the best way to address a compacted schedule is to identify key milestones for both deliverables and decision making. The success of the project will heavily rely on City input throughout the process to ensure review and approval tasks take minimal time. The tentative schedule for the project provided in the RFP includes the following phase durations from the time of developer selection:
1. Developer Selection to Council Approval: 2 weeks + 2 days.
2. Council Approval to Signed Contract: 6 weeks.
3. Signed Contract to Tentative Subdivision Map (TSM) Approval: 13 weeks + 1 day.
4. TSM Approval to Start of Construction: 2 weeks.
We have identified that the proposed schedule contains problematic timeframes during the early phases. The time for council approval to a signed contract should be reduced as much as possible. This may be in part due to the time the City requires to negotiate and receive approval for funding prior to signing a contract. The current proposed 6 weeks would require the developer to proceed at risk to meet the construction start date of May 15, 2024. It would appear the City would also be proceeding Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
3 at risk for all work completed prior to the grant funding approval on March 30, 2024. The schedule will also be dependent on the completion of the environmental studies, as any requirements from these reports will be required to be integrated into the project design as quickly as possible. Ideally, these items would be known prior to the 30% submittal.
The proposed schedule also assumes that the TSM approval process would have to proceed concurrently with the improvement plan approval process, as there are only 15 weeks from the signed contract to start of construction. The success of this project will be highly dependent on the design team being efficient in the preparation of construction documents as well as the City being efficient on regulatory review and approval.
Ridgeline's project approach begins with completing essential environmental work while simultaneously initiating the project's design, subject to adjustments based on environmental findings.
Coordination with regulatory bodies such as the Army Corps of Engineers, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board (CVRWQCB) is crucial for expediting permits. Ridgeline maintains a positive standing with these agencies.
With the addition of our multi-discipline design team that has extensive experience in working with both private and public entities, we are committed to partnering with the City to meet the schedule demands of the project. We also propose to take a phased approach to the project, acquiring permits and approvals, which allow for construction to begin while final elements of the project are still being designed and approved. Employing a phased improvement plan strategy, including plan checks and approvals for specific components, allows for efficient progress. If we can secure approval solely for grading, we will initiate earth-moving activities. If additional time is required, we can pursue sewer approval and commence sewer line work concurrently with the ongoing improvement plan process.
This approach has proven effective in saving considerable time for us in previous projects. Ridgeline views this venture as a partnership with the City, relying on combined expertise to navigate challenges promptly. To assist in facilitating the impacted design schedule, we propose that all City-required approvals be fast tracked, including special session of the City Council to obtain approvals for signed contracts, TSM, and Final Map. We also rely on close coordination with the City Inspection Department as well as the on-site inspectors' adaptability to construction issues. Once a plan is established, initiating Redding Electric Utility’s (REU’s) design process becomes crucial, requiring a prompt turnaround from them. Additionally, securing essential equipment for REU is imperative, especially considering past shortages. Anticipating equipment shortages, Ridgeline plans to promptly secure necessary materials, leveraging its coordination experience to ensure daily progress. The commitment of the partners and Ridgeline's dedication will be needed to successfully deliver the project for the City.
PACE will provide survey, civil, electrical, structural, and water/wastewater design services for the project. The advantage of utilizing a single design firm is a reduction in coordination and administrative time for the project design and approval. PACE has long-standing relationships with City staff, giving us the ability to quickly identify and resolve project issues with little impact on the schedule of the project.
PACE also has extensive experience providing contract City Engineer/Surveyor services, which uniquely allows them to expeditiously coordinate with reviewing agencies and prepare construction documents that require minimal effort for review and approval.
Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
4 To provide additional access to the project parcel, Ridgeline has been in contact with the owner of the parcel directly north of the subject parcel, which has direct access to Quartz Hill Road. Ridgeline aims to privately acquire the parcel then deed a street right-of-way to Shasta County to provide access to the parcel. This would provide access points and a potential commercial component to optimize the TSM. Ridgeline also intends to utilize the existing right-of-way off Buenaventura Boulevard at the site of the informal Caulder Drive gravel road. This would provide additional access to the development from the west and provide access to recreational improvements. These improvements will include the addition of a community park, walking and bike trails as well as roadway elements that highlight the surrounding area. See Unique Additions Section on page 38 for a more detailed vision of the benefits we intend to bring as part of this development. We anticipate the City will require the formation of the Landscape Maintenance District (LMD) for the ongoing maintenance of these features as well as lighting throughout the project.
The project parcel has approximately 120 vertical feet of elevation change, which impacts the location of site features, as well as the cost of development. The project site also contains two major drainages (Carter Creek), which flow to the east property line into an existing detention easement. Ridgeline has extensive experience in the development of subdivisions with these site conditions, having recently developed the Pleasant Hills subdivision in Anderson, California. Similar to the proposed development, Ridgeline was able to effectively construct public infrastructure with lots in steep terrain and crossings over drainage courses. PACE also has extensive experience with developing subdivisions in steep terrain, having developed the Land Park, Stanford Hills, and Alize Unit 1 subdivisions directly south of the proposed project.
Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
5 The project parcel contains substantial areas that will have to be avoided or creatively accommodated during development of the subdivision due to existing easements and greenways. The parcel is currently encumbered by easements for WAPA, City sewer, storm drain detention area, and dedicated green space, as well as road access easements. While the road access easements may be able to be modified as part of the project, the others will have to be accommodated by the proposed design.
The final issue facing the project is the availability of construction resources in the area. The project proposes to start construction in May 2024 but, given the impacted timeline of the project, many contractors will already have projects lined up for 2024. Ridgeline currently has construction resources engaged on other projects that could be easily pivoted to the construction of this project.
Our proposed format of a targeted design-build approach would allow our team to begin acquiring subcontractors for the project while design is progressing. We are also proposing to obtain multiple subcontractors for construction activities to expedite the time required to complete each construction phase. Ridgeline has an extensive network of subcontractors that can be quickly engaged on the project.
WORK PLAN
As soon as Ridgeline is selected to provide services for this project, we will schedule a kick-off meeting with City staff to discuss the project elements and ensure we understand the City’s concerns and expectations. This will include the project approach, schedule, and budget. Then, we will conduct a site visit with the City to accurately evaluate existing site conditions and constraints. Once the kickoff and site visit with the City are complete, we will immediately send out personnel to conduct the geotechnical investigation (KC Engineering Company) and topographic survey (PACE). After the geotechnical report has been generated and the survey completed, we will begin developing the preliminary construction documents. The following are the anticipated design deliverables:
1. Design Development (DD) Phase:
a. 30% DD, 60% DD, and 90% DD:
i. Drawings.
2. Tentative Subdivision Map.
3. Construction Documents (CD) Phase:
a. 50% CD, 95% CD:
i. Drawings and specifications.
b. Final Bid Documents:
i. Drawings, specifications, and contract documents.
At this time, the 100% drawings will be ready for final submittal and ready for bid. All details, specifications, calculations, and plans shall be signed/stamped by the Engineers of Record. As the project moves through bid support and into construction, we will ensure that the same design engineers and technicians that were involved during design are integrally involved during construction.
By dedicating the same resources, we are able to further control the quality of the project.
Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
6 Our approach is that Ridgeline will be the Prime Contractor for the project and will select and coordinate his own subcontractors. This will allow Ridgeline to build the construction team while drawings are being developed and finalized. This brings the added benefit of construction input during the design phase and will significantly shorten the time required from final approval of construction documents to starting construction. Ridgeline will take an active role in the construction management of the project. As a contractor, Ridgeline is uniquely suited to seamlessly transition from the development phase to the construction phase of the project. Our history of successfully working with area subcontractors will allow us to build an efficient construction team and keep construction related delays to a minimum.
During construction phase, the following are anticipated deliverables:
1. Construction Administration (CA) Phase:
a. As-Builts from Contractor.
b. Record Drawings.
2. Final Map.
3. Engineer’s Report for LMD.
SCOPE OF WORK
Ridgeline and PACE have completed numerous past subdivision projects, and we look forward to working with the City on delivering this high-quality neighborhood for Redding. In addition to the City, we anticipate other stakeholders in this project to include US Mail, AT&T, Spectrum, REU, PG&E, California Department of Fish & Wildlife, Redding Municipal Utilities, CVRWQCB, and the Army Corps of Engineers.
We anticipate the Scope of Work to complete this project to include the following:
Conceptual Design Phase
1. Project Management and Grant Administration:
a. Attend and document design meetings, prepare project correspondence, manage subcontractors (geotechnical), maintain project files, and manage the design team. b. Coordinate with City staff for the CDBG-DR-INF grant administration. c. Ensure project scope is consistent with the grant application and other agreements and ensure compliance with grant program and funding agreement requirements. d. Perform one initial site visit to meet with City personnel and document existing conditions.
2. Geotechnical Investigation:
a. Conduct a geotechnical investigation of the project site sufficient to support project design.
A report shall be provided with the findings and results of the investigation.
3. Topographic Survey:
a. PACE will send a survey crew to conduct a topographic survey of the project site. The surveyors will then provide a topographic model that will be used for the design of the project.
Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
7 b. PACE will prepare Record Boundary maps based on monumentation found during site investigation.
c. City to supply a current title report so existing easements may be identified and shown on the TSM.
DD Phase
1. 30% Preliminary Engineering Design:
a. PACE will prepare and submit preliminary plans at the 30% design stage for the project sufficient for the City and other regulatory agencies to perform their reviews. 30% engineering design services shall include but are not limited to:
i. Develop conceptual design for all site elements making up the project. Develop a minimum of two site layout concepts for review by the stakeholders. Refine concept design based on feedback from City staff and develop a revised concept design for approval.
ii. Preliminary cost estimates.
iii. Update project schedule as required.
iv. 30% Design Review Meeting (virtual).
2. California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)/National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and Permitting:
a. PACE will coordinate with City staff on the CEQA process as required. b. NEPA has already been completed.
3. 60% Preliminary Engineering Design:
a. PACE will prepare and submit 60% Construction Documents for the project sufficient for the City and other regulatory agencies to perform their reviews. 60% engineering design services shall include but are not limited to:
i. Respond to and incorporate all 30% comments received from the City and other regulatory agencies.
ii. Prepare preliminary subdivision layout, grading, utility, and MS4 plans. iii. Update cost estimates as required.
iv. Update project schedule as required.
v. 60% Design Review Meeting (virtual).
4. 90% Preliminary Engineering Design:
a. PACE will prepare and submit 90% Construction Documents for the project sufficient for the City and other regulatory agencies to perform their reviews. 90% engineering design services shall include but are not limited to:
i. Respond to and incorporate all 30% comments received from the City and other regulatory agencies.
ii. Prepare design calculations, plans, technical specifications, and engineer’s cost estimates.
iii. Update project schedule as required.
iv. 90% Design Review Meeting (virtual).
Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
8 5. Submit 90% drawings for various regulatory agency review.
6. Prepare Clearing and Grubbing permit package.
7. Tentative Subdivision Map:
a. Prepare and submit documents to the City to process a TSM application.
CD Phase
1. Project Management and Grant Administration:
a. Throughout the CD phase, PACE will attend and document design meetings, prepare project correspondence, manage subcontractors (geotechnical), maintain project files, and manage the design team.
b. PACE will coordinate with City staff for the CDBG-DR-INF grant administration. c. PACE will ensure project scope is consistent with the grant application and other agreements and ensure compliance with grant program and funding agreement requirements.
2. Final Engineering Design:
a. PACE will prepare and submit 50% Construction Documentsfor the project sufficient for the City and other regulatory agencies to perform their reviews. 50% engineering design services shall include but are not limited to:
i. Respond to and incorporate all preliminary design comments received from the City and other regulatory agencies.
ii. Prepare design calculations, plans, technical specifications, and engineer’s cost estimates.
iii. Update project schedule as required.
iv. 50% Design Review Meeting (virtual).
v. Coordinate various regulatory agencies’ review comments. b. PACE will prepare and submit 90% Construction Documentsfor the project sufficient for the City and other regulatory agencies to perform their reviews. 90% engineering design services shall include but are not limited to:
vi. Respond to and incorporate all 60% comments received from the City and other regulatory agencies.
vii. Prepare design calculations, plans, technical specifications, and engineer’s cost estimates.
viii. Update project schedule as required.
ix. 90% Design Review Meeting (virtual).
c. After the 90% review, PACE will proceed into final engineering design services, which shall include but not be limited to the following:
i. Respond to and incorporate all 90% comments received from the City and other regulatory agencies.
ii. Coordination with all utilities required to ensure horizontal and vertical conflicts are identified and resolved through design or relocation.
Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
9 iii. Final design drawings will be stamped and signed by the Responsible Engineer and shall be provided on 22-inch by 34-inch paper. Specifications and engineer’s cost estimates shall be provided on 8.5-inch by 11-inch paper.
iv. Electronic copy of the final drawings, font, and library files in AutoCAD format. v. Final design calculations.
vi. Final technical specifications.
vii. Final engineer’s cost estimate.
viii. The construction documents and contract documents will be submitted to the City for plan check review.
Bid Assistance
Ridgeline assumes that, based on our design-build approach and schedule constraints, we will not have to competitively bid on the construction work. Ridgeline will act as the prime contractor and coordinate subcontractors at their discretion. The time periods required for public bidding would pose a risk to the project meeting specified deadlines.
Should the funding agency or City require competitive bidding, we can provide typical Contract Bidding support as follows:
a. Attend a pre-bid site visit meeting to show prospective bidders the project and to answer questions.
b. Assist the City with responses to technical questions from the contractors or suppliers during bidding.
c. Provide drawings, modifications, and clarifications through the bidding process as required to clarify design intent.
d. Prepare any necessary addenda to the contract documents. e. Review and evaluate bids for compliance with the construction documents and state law. f. Provide City staff with a recommendation for award.
CA Phase
1. Our team will provide CA services during the construction phase of the project. These services will include:
a. In addition to the pre-construction meeting, completion inspection and final acceptance, developershall participate in weekly on-site construction meetings, as required, throughout the duration of construction activity for on-site review of the construction progress.
Developer and developer’s consultants shall also attend, as necessary, any required site meetings needed to resolve construction issues that require site attention. Developer shall conduct a final inspection walk-through and final punch list review and project acceptance.
Developer shall take, reproduce, and distribute minutes of all the above meetings to participants of the meetings.
b. We assume City staff will be utilized should the grant funding require daily inspections.
Should the City not have the required resources, PACE can provide full-time on-site representative during construction.
Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
PROJECT APPROACH AND UNDERSTANDING
10 c. Provide special inspections as required by the City and project contract documents. d. Assist the City with submittal reviews, preparation of change orders, and responses to requests for information (RFIs) related to design technical issues encountered. e. Provide labor code compliance and prevailing wage monitoring services. This includes review of certified payrolls, interviews, and documentation. f. Construction staking.
2. Prepare Record Drawings from the As-Built markups provided by Ridgeline and Responsible Engineer. The original Engineer’s stamp shall be maintained on the As-Built Drawings. An “As-Built” or “Record Drawing” stamp shall be maintained on the As-Built Drawings. As-Built Drawings shall be provided to the City in AutoCAD and PDF formats on a USB drive.
3. Prepare a Final Map package for the project, which will include:
a. Setting the necessary property corners for the parcels. b. Preparation of maps and supporting documentation
c. Preparation of restrictive covenants for parcels dedicated to meeting the 51% threshold reserved for residents who make 80% of the average median income (AMI) for Shasta County.
4. Prepare an Engineer’s Report to support the formation of a LMD for the ongoing maintenance of the landscape, park, recreation facilities, open space, detention facilities, and lighting.
Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
11 RIDGELINE AT A GLANCE
Ridgeline boasts a team of highly skilled professionals specializing in turnkey development projects.
With extensive expertise, we adeptly navigate the entire process, from acquiring all land to obtaining full entitlements. Our comprehensive approach involves managing every construction aspect, from designing tailored floor plans for specific communities to efficiently delivering up to 50 homes annually.
Supported by a dedicated sales team, we ensure personalized service for buyers throughout the construction journey. Our commitment to swift build times sets us apart in the local industry, and we take pride in maintaining a high-level warranty program, standing firmly behind the quality of our products.
Over the past six years, Ridgeline has been a key player in managing vertical home construction, land acquisitions, entitlement, and on-site construction for finished lots. With a commitment to excellence, Ridgeline has successfully overseen the vertical construction of homes while simultaneously developing future lots. This dual focus has allowed for the completion of four separate developments within four and a half years.
Building strong relationships with subcontractors has been a cornerstone of Ridgeline's success. The collective experience of the team brings valuable solutions to challenges faced by developers during the construction process. The company takes pride in its project coordination, ensuring timely completion and maintenance of good standing with local oversight agencies. Throughout the construction process, Ridgeline maintains a commitment to clean project sites and consistently delivering quality outcomes. This dedication has established Ridgeline as a reliable and reputable force in the realm of construction and development.
In 2014, Ridgeline’s Principals began focusing on
new construction in Palo Cedro. With success in
working with these home buyers and
establishing a family of subcontractors, Brian
Walker and Jon Warren formalized the
relationship and branding of Ridgeline.
Ridgeline went on to acquire and develop
multiple phases of the Pleasant Hills subdivision
in Anderson, California. Pleasant Hills
subdivision, acquired in 2016, began the first
phase construction in 2017, which included
49 new homes. Planning and design of future
phases and developments were ongoing while
current homes and phases were under construction. Phase 2 work (39 lots) began in 2017 with planning and design and construction starting in 2018 and completed in 2019. Ridgeline continued to build these homes while Phase 3 construction began (38 lots) in 2019 through 2020. Phase 5 construction ran from 2021 through 2022. Construction of new homes always runs concurrent with development construction.
Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
12 This entailed working with all project-related governmental agencies, including the Army Corps of Engineers, CVRWQCB, utility companies, and the City of Anderson to design and develop within the creeks and rugged ridges while meeting all agency environmental requirements. Ridgeline have always been and will continue to remain in good standing with all agencies. Ridgeline’s Elk Crest subdivision in east Redding was also within an environmentally sensitive area requiring special care by the team to ensure the Clover Creek Preserve remained unharmed. Elk Crest subdivision started in 2019 and was completed in 2020, with the final home built in 2021. With the acquisition of The Vistas on Quartz Hill Road, Ridgeline is prepared to meet and exceed north Redding’s environmental challenges. Having successfully completed the development of these subdivision phases and by following up with quality value-oriented new home construction of 140+ homes in the local area over recent years, we look forward to partnering with the City on this project.
Key Staff:
Brian Walker, Owner/Developer
Jon Warren, Partner
Jennifer Walker, Listing Agent/Realtor
Ann Walker, Interior Designer/Realtor
Guy Walfoort, Project Manager
Company Established: 2016
Professional Services Annual Dollar Volume: Approximately $7,000,000-$11,000,000 Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
13 PACE AT A GLANCE
PACE Engineering, Inc. (PACE) was established in 1976 and has provided engineering and surveying services in Northern California for over 45 years. We are a multi-discipline engineering firm located in Redding, California, specializing in water and wastewater facilities, instrumentation and control, electrical, mechanical, structural, land development, surveying, and mapping. Our broad range of services allows us to meet the needs of our clients. We currently provide engineering services to numerous cities and special districts throughout the North State from Yreka to Williams and from Orick to Susanville. As a firm, PACE has extensive experience in providing the personnel and services needed to complete major public works projects from the planning stage through construction and operation.
Currently, seventy-seven employees, including twenty licensed civil engineers, four licensed electrical engineers, three licensed mechanical engineers, and four licensed land surveyors, make up our professional team. Four of our civil engineers are also licensed structural engineers. We offer a full range of services including master planning and feasibility studies; rate studies; preliminary design; project funding procurement; final design including construction plans and specifications; construction cost estimating; contract administration; construction
observation services; and contract operations of water and wastewater treatment facilities.
Every project presents unique challenges pertaining to the proper balance between client desires and expectations, available funding, and satisfaction of regulatory
requirements. PACE prides itself in our ability to work with all stakeholders involved to deliver a project that meets these expectations. It starts with proactive project management and effective communication between parties. Our project managers are trained to lead this communication effort from project inception through final construction, startup, and operations.
Principal Shareholders:
Paul J. Reuter, President and Managing Engineer
Shawn Wade, Secretary/CFO
Robert F. Harp, Vice President
Tony Bowser, Vice President
Laurie McCollum, Vice President
Seth Petrie, Principal Engineer
Jesse Lenaker, Principal Surveyor
Staff Shareholders:
Calvin Abshier, Bryan Barnes, Jessica Chandler, Paige Cibart, Jen Collins, Bryan Gentles, Tammy Hale, Nicole Harris, Garett Hattenhauer, Wesley Inman, Troy Jones, Eli Jurisich, Jeffrey Krantz, Keith Krantz, Karalee Layton, James Litts, Duayne Loucks, Grant Maxwell, Sean McGuigan, Adam Miller, Chris Needham, Karrie Nunes, Curtis Paget, Ignacio Sanchez, Ryan Turner, Michael Walters, and Steve Wilson
Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
14 Firm Established: April 15, 1976
Number of Employees:
77 total employees (27 licensed engineers, 4 licensed land surveyors, 19 staff engineers, 10 administrative, and 17 technical)
Professional Licenses:
California
Civil...................20
Structural ...........4
Electrical ............4
Mechanical.........3
Land Survey........4
Montana
Electrical ............1
Educational Degrees:
B.S. Engineering .... 38
M.S. Engineering ..... 7
B.S. Geomatics ........ 1
Professional Services Annual Dollar Volume: Approximately $19,000,000 Nevada
Electrical ...............1
Oregon
Civil .......................1
Structural ..............1
Electrical ...............1
Mechanical ...........1
Washington
Electrical ...............1
Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
15 CIVIL ENGINEERING
PACE’s civil design team offers diversified capabilities to suit the needs of both public and private clients. Our experience in land development includes site and utility design of water/wastewater facilities, industrial facilities, schools, healthcare facilities, commercial office buildings, commercial retail spaces, roadways, and storm drain facilities. This broad experience enables our team to provide exceptional design services for a variety of projects. Our team has completed dozens of projects from overseeing subdivisions to grading and utility plans for public and private developments.
Subdivision and site engineering capabilities include:
• Feasibility Studies
• Land Development Planning
• Site Layout, Roadway, Parking, and Accessibility Design • Grading Design and Analysis
• Utility Design and Coordination
• Hydrology/Hydraulic/Storm Water Analysis, Reports, and Compliance (MS4) • Erosion Control Design and SWPPP Preparation and Execution • GIS Services for Asset Management
PACE’s civil design team, managed by Seth Petrie, Principal Engineer, includes three licensed engineers, two of whom are registered Qualified SWPPP Practitioners/Qualified SWPPP Developers (QSPs/QSDs). Our team is knowledgeable in all areas of site design and endeavors to use creative solutions to exceed the expectations of our clients.
Site design project examples include Plumas County, Tehama County, and Shasta County administration buildings, Redding Bank of Commerce, The Vistas Assisted Living, Good News Rescue Mission, Shasta College, North Cottonwood School, Dollar General stores, and multiple other commercial, educational, and healthcare developments.
Subdivision Design:
PACE has a long history of successfully
delivering high quality neighborhoods in
Northern California. This includes all
subdivisions adjacent to the project site, such
as Land Park, River Ridge Park, River Ridge
Terrace, Stanford Hills, and Alize Unit 1
subdivisions.
Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
16 Additional subdivisions completed in the greater Redding area include Buenaventura Park, Summerfield Meadows, Tuscan Gardens, and Jackson Meadows and assisting with the completion of the Rio subdivision for D.R. Horton.
The team’s experience with public as well as private clients provides a well-rounded perspective for the process of land development, which provides a healthy interface between our City clients and their private clientele.
Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
17 WATER AND WASTEWATER ENGINEERING
PACE prepares water and sewer feasibility studies and master plans throughout Northern California. Our engineers design water distribution and sewer collection systems that include treatment plants, wells, booster pump stations, reservoirs, lift stations, and other related facilities for public agencies. We use InfoWater and InfoSewer by Innovyze for water system hydraulic and sewer system capacity analyses, both programs interface with GIS.
PACE's water and wastewater design team, managed by Paul Reuter, Managing Engineer, includes twelve licensed engineers, five of whom have master’s degrees in environmental engineering. All have extensive experience managing PACE’s water and wastewater projects from early planning stages through final construction, including:
• Water Distribution and Collection System Design
• Water Storage Tank Design
• Project Funding Assistance
• Water Well Design
• Water and Wastewater Treatment Plant Design
• Master Water and Sewer Plans
• Permit Assistance
• Preliminary Engineering Reports
• Utility Rate Studies
• Watershed Sanitary Surveys
• Water and Sewer Hydraulic Modeling
• Particle Count Demonstration Studies
• Pilot Studies
We provide expertise with local, state, and federal funding sources, which has proven to be a great benefit to our municipal clients. We understand the importance of a thorough and well-thought-out master planning effort for the long-term viability of water and wastewater systems. The scopes of work for master plans are tailored to the client’s needs and are often dictated by available monetary resources. We can work effectively with clients to prepare a scope of work that best fits their available resources yet provide the necessary technical and financial information to meet expectations.
“The members of the Board of
Directors of Bella Vista Water
District express their sincere
appreciation to PACE
Engineering and their staff for
the outstanding effort put forth
on the Wintu Pump Station and
Water Treatment Expansion
Project, which was completed on
schedule and on budget and
brought this District into
full compliance with the Surface
Water Treatment Rate.”
~Board of Directors,
Bella Vista Water District
Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
18 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
PACE has four licensed structural engineers and three staff project engineers who provide full-time structural engineering. They have a broad range of design experience ranging from retaining walls to multi-story buildings and bridges. Our structural engineering team also has extensive experience with complete building design services for offices, industrial and processing facilities, and warehouses.
Design Capabilities:
Bridges
• Steel
• Concrete
• Timber
• Falsework Design
Water and Wastewater Facilities
• Tanks
• Basins
• Filters
Building Design
• Commercial
• Industrial
• Institutional
• Residential
Foundations
• Prefabricated Metal Buildings
• Shallow Foundations
• Deep Foundations
Construction Inspection and Testing:
• Masonry, Concrete, Steel, and Wood
• Quality Control Observation
• Paint and Coating Application
• Roofing
Computer Analysis:
• Cold-Formed Steel Design
• Two- and Three-Dimensional Truss
and Frame Analysis
• Computer-Aided Drafting
Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
19 ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
PACE has experience in a wide range of electrical engineering responsibilities and continues to expand capabilities to keep up with changing technology. Our range of electrical design projects includes water/wastewater facilities, industrial facilities, schools, healthcare facilities, commercial office buildings, commercial retail spaces, and sports field lighting.
Some of our specialty design projects consist of wireless SCADA and custom control systems for water/wastewater facilities, standby power systems consisting of generators and/or solar photovoltaic systems, and 12kV power distribution systems.
In order to meet project demands, PACE’s Electrical Engineering Department is capable of performing all of the following tasks:
• Electrical Power Distribution and Controls
• Medium Voltage Power Distribution and Controls
• Automated Control System Design and Implementation
• SCADA/PLC Programming and Configuration
• Radio Telemetry
• Standby Generation Facilities
• Photovoltaic System Design and Analysis
• Protective Device Studies and Arc Flash Hazard Analysis • Lighting System Design/Photometric Analysis
• Fire Alarm Design
• Conformance to CA Energy Codes, HCAI, and DSA Standards • Conformance to LEED Certification Standards
• Experience with the Latest Versions of AutoCAD and Revit PACE’s Electrical Engineering Department, led by Anthony Bowser, Principal Engineer, includes four licensed engineers and is dedicated to meeting the needs of our clients. The goal for each project is to deliver a thorough and complete design within schedule that meets or exceeds expectations without compromising our integrity.
Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
20 LAND SURVEYING
PACE’s Survey Department is responsible for
property surveys and the preparation of
legal descriptions for hundreds of
rights-of-way and easements for road and
utility projects. PACE teams provide survey
supervision and coordination for control
surveys, property boundary surveys, aerial
mapping, topographic surveys, construction
staking, and ALTA title surveys. PACE’s
widely respected Survey Department is led
by Jesse Lenaker, L.S.
Our survey crews are equipped with the latest in
“total station” technology, including two robotic
total stations. Additionally, PACE is one of the few
firms in Northern California that owns and
operates a GNSS continually operating GPS base
station. We are the northernmost member of the
California Survey and Drafting Supply’s CSDS RTN.
This GPS system provides significant cost savings
for control surveys and topographic surveys in
open areas.
Several years ago, PACE added 3D laser scanning to the long list of surveying services we provide.
Now PACE is offering aerial mapping with drones. Mapping with drones provides an efficient method for supplementing our field surveys
with up-to-date aerial imagery and the ability
to capture large amounts of data in relatively
short periods of time. Drone surveys are ideal
for providing incremental surveys to monitor
construction progress or provide volumetric
calculations for stockpiles or other masses.
Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
21 ORGANIZATIONAL CHART
PROJECT
COORDINATOR/DEVELOPER
Brian Walker, Owner
CONSTRUCTION
PROJECT MANAGER
Guy Walfoort
PARTNER/ADMINISTRATOR
Jon Warren
MARKETING
Jennifer Walker
Ann Walker
PRINCIPAL-IN-CHARGE
Seth Petrie, P.E.
LAND SURVEYING
Jesse Lenaker, L.S.
Ignacio Sanchez, L.S.
Wesley Inman, L.S.
James Litts, L.S.
STRUCTURAL
ENGINEERING
Shawn Wade, P.E.
Steve Wilson, P.E.
WATER/WASTEWATER
ENGINEERING
Laurie McCollum, P.E.
Grant Maxwell, P.E.
ELECTRICAL
ENGINEERING
Tony Bowser, P.E.
Calvin Abshier, P.E.
Bryan Barnes, P.E.
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Troy Jones, P.E.
Seth Petrie, P.E.
Ryan Turner, P.E.
David Phanthavady
Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
22 BRIAN WALKER - RIDGELINE
Brian Walker is a seasoned residential home builder and land developer, bringing over two decades of expertise to the industry. With a passion for transforming unimproved land, Brian founded Ridgeline in 2016 and has since navigated through the intricacies of the entitlement process. From conceptualization to completion, he is deeply engaged in every step, contributing his keen eye for design and layout.
Since 2004, Brian has been a stalwart in the residential construction scene, managing daily on-site activities with a focus on delivering completed homes efficiently. His commitment to crafting modern house plans tailored to each project sets Ridgeline apart. Brian takes pride in ensuring high-quality homes are created in a cost-effective manner, as he understands the enduring impact these projects have on our community.
Brian takes great pride in the workmanship of his team and never lets himself lose sight of the fact that they are not just building a house, they are building someone’s home. It is in that same spirit that Brian relies on local vendors to work on all of his projects and to ensure that he is helping create jobs in Shasta County.
JON WARREN - RIDGELINE
Jon Warren is a well-rounded business owner/operator with over 28 years of experience in the construction and adjacent industries. With humble beginnings in a Redding, California garage, he engaged in grassroots sales and marketing to build out operations across the western United States of America serving 300,000 customers annually at his company LinkUs Enterprises. As a strong strategic thinker, he was able to build a $50M a year company. With the financial health of the in-home service company, he was able enter the real estate and construction industries beginning in 2004 with subdividing and new home builds. Alder Creek was founded in 2009, where he started buying single-family homes to renovate for rentals. It expanded beyond the initial 50 properties to include single-family homes to apartments and commercial flex properties across the western United States of America. Co-founding Ridgeline in 2016 with a focus on new construction in Shasta County, Jon has been a part of the Pleasant Hills subdivision in Anderson.
With its success of the Pleasant Hills subdivision’s multiple phases, the company also completed Elk Crest subdivision and acquired The Vistas.
GUY WALFOORT - RIDGELINE
Four years after moving to Shasta County in 1985, Guy began his career in the construction industry. He has been fortunate to have hands-on experience in multiple building trades. In 2002, Guy expanded his career to construction management. He joined the Ridgeline team in 2018 as Project Manager, supervising all new builds.
SETH PETRIE, P.E. - PACE
Seth Petrie is a registered Civil Engineer with over twenty years of experience in the civil engineering field. His responsibilities include project management and design as well as being the Head of the Land Development Department at PACE. He is experienced in the areas of subdivision, commercial, education, medical, industrial, low-impact development (LID), and utility design (storm drain, water distribution, and sanitary sewer), hydrology analysis (river, Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
23 stream, floodplain using Hydraflow, HEC-1, and HEC RAS), flood elevation analysis and certification, geographic information systems (GIS), and Autodesk CAD software. Mr. Petrie is also the City Engineer for the Cities of Anderson, Dunsmuir, Mt. Shasta, Weed, and Yreka as well as District Engineer for the Chester Public Utility District and County Engineer for Siskiyou County.
TROY JONES, P.E. - PACE
Troy Jones has been involved in a variety of civil engineering projects over the last twenty-eight years at PACE. Mr. Jones has experience in the design of storm drains, sewer, water, and site improvements, and has served as Project Engineer on several roadway, municipal improvement, and site development projects. He is a licensed engineer in California and has worked in the consulting field for 21 years and in the surveying field for an additional 4 years. His responsibilities include project management, design, technical specification preparation, utility coordination, and hydraulic analysis.
LAURIE McCOLLUM, P.E. - PACE
Ms. McCollum has been a member of the PACE team since 2006 and obtained her M.S. in Environmental Engineering Sciences in 2012. Laurie is the Head of the Water/Wastewater Department and is a provider of project management, planning, funding, and design engineering services. She has experience in various water and wastewater planning efforts including Master Plans, Preliminary Engineering Reports, Wastewater Dilution Studies, Pollution Prevention Plans, and Antidegradation Analyses. Ms. McCollum’s skills set includes water and sewer modeling software (InfoWater and InfoSewer by Innovyze), AutoCAD design software (Arc GIS Software, Land Desktop, & Architectural Desktop), wastewater treatment, water distribution, wastewater collection system design, and construction observation experience for water and wastewater projects.
GRANT MAXWELL, P.E. - PACE
Mr. Maxwell graduated with a B.S. in Civil Engineering from California State University, Chico, joined PACE in 2008, and completed graduate studies at California State University, Sacramento, in 2014. He has experience in compaction testing, water distribution and sewage collection system design, land surveying, and construction observation. He regularly utilizes InfoWater by Innovyze and H2O MAP Sewer, AutoCAD, and Arc GIS Software. Mr. Maxwell has been responsible for or assisted in the preparation of numerous preliminary engineering reports, feasibility studies, and alternative analyses.
SHAWN WADE, P.E. - PACE
Mr. Wade is a registered Structural and Civil Engineer in California with twelve years of experience in structural design. He graduated in 2010 with a B.S. in Architectural Engineering from Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo and in 2012 with an M.S. in Civil Engineering from University of California, Davis and has been a part of the PACE team since 2014. He has experience in a wide variety of building structures including schools, commercial, industrial, and municipal. In addition to buildings, he has experience with water storage and conveyance structures, dewatering plans including cofferdam designs, and repairs/maintenance of dam gates. Shawn also has experience in architectural design of office, commercial, and municipal buildings.
Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
24 TONY BOWSER, P.E. - PACE
Tony Bowser is a registered Professional Electrical Engineer in the State of California with over twenty years of design and construction experience. His experience includes water/wastewater control systems as well as electrical power distribution, lighting system design, fire alarm system design, low voltage system design, alternative power sources, and standby generating systems.
BRYAN BARNES, P.E. - PACE
Mr. Barnes is a registered Electrical Engineer in the States of California and Oregon. He obtained a B.S. in Electrical and Computer Engineering with an emphasis on Power Systems from Oregon State University in 2014. Mr. Barnes then worked at Peak Reliability and Michel Corporation from 2014 until 2016 where he developed his project management and electrical power design skills before starting employment at PACE in 2016. Mr. Barnes is adept at electrical power (including lighting, generation, battery system, and photovoltaic), fire alarm, and technology system designs. Some of his design experience has been in hospitals, medical facilities, K-12 schools, universities, housing buildings, office buildings, industrial facilities, museums, labs and research facilities, municipality facilities, and specialized cultivation facilities. He is most experienced in managing and engineering projects that require a knowledgeable Electrical Engineer with an understanding of multiple engineering disciplines.
JESSE LENAKER, L.S. - PACE
Mr. Lenaker is a licensed land surveyor with eighteen years of experience. He joined PACE in 2016 and has been the Survey Manager since January 2017. His surveying background is wide ranging and includes experience completing boundary, cadastral, construction, control, and topographic surveys. Additionally, he has over 4 years of experience managing complex survey projects for both public and private sector clients. In addition to his experience, Mr. Lenaker furthered his education by completing the requirements for a B.A. in Physical Science from California State University, Chico.
IGNACIO SANCHEZ, L.S. - PACE
Mr. Sanchez is a licensed land surveyor with twenty years of experience. He joined PACE in 2005 and is currently the Assistant Survey Manager. His background in land surveying and drafting includes mapping subdivisions, boundary determination, cadastral, construction staking, monitoring, and topographic surveys.
Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
25 Table 1 contains a list of similar projects that align with the scope requirements in the Request for Proposal, wherein Ridgeline provided professional services in the recent past.
TABLE 1
RIDGELINE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
PROJECT INFORMATION CONTACT/REFERENCE
Project Name: Elk Crest Subdivision
Owner: Brian Walker/Mountain Air Group
Description: The project consisted of a 7-lot subdivision in Redding, California. The subdivision was an infill project located adjacent to the Clover Acres and Center Court Village subdivisions. Lots range in size from 0.23 to 0.96 acres.
Ridgeline provided services from land planning and entitlements through finished home construction and the marketing and selling of the residential properties.
Lily Toy
Planning Manager
City of Redding
777 Cypress Ave
Redding, CA 96001
(530) 245-7231
[email protected]
Project Name: Pleasant Hills Phase 1
Owner: Brian Walker/Jon Warren
Description: The project consisted of the first of five phases for the Pleasant Hills planned development in Anderson, California. The first phase consisted of 50 lots, which ranged in size from 0.20 to 0.38 acres. This phase was developed as value-based construction targeting LMI homeowners. The subdivision is located in terrain with considerable slope issues, which required creative strategies to maximize buildable area, ensure proper utility service, and address stormwater management. This included the use of retaining walls and bridge culvert.
Ridgeline provided services for infrastructure revisions, vertical home construction, and the marketing and selling of the residential properties.
Jeff Kiser
City Manager
City of Anderson
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 95661
(530) 378-6650
[email protected]
Project Name: Pleasant Hills Phase 2
Owner: Brian Walker/Jon Warren
Description: The project consisted of the second of five phases for the Pleasant Hills planned development in Anderson, California. The second phase consisted of 38 lots, which ranged in size from 0.20 to 0.50 acres. This phase was developed as a blend of value-based construction targeting LMI homeowners and larger custom homes with luxury views. The subdivision is located in terrain with considerable slope issues, which required creative strategies to maximize buildable area, ensure proper utility service, and address stormwater management.
Ridgeline provided services from land planning and entitlements through finished home construction and the marketing and selling of the residential properties.
Jeff Kiser
City Manager
City of Anderson
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 95661
(530) 378-6650
[email protected]
Project Name: Pleasant Hills Phase 3
Owner: Brian Walker/Jon Warren
Description: The project consisted of the third of five phases for the Pleasant Hills planned development in Anderson, California. The third phase consisted of 39 lots, which ranged in size from 0.20 to 2.30 acres. The lots were intended to support large custom homes with luxury views. The subdivision is located in terrain with considerable slope issues, which required creative strategies to maximize buildable area, ensure proper utility service, and address stormwater management.
Ridgeline provided services from land planning and entitlements through finished home construction.
Jeff Kiser
City Manager
City of Anderson
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 95661
(530) 378-6650
[email protected]
Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
26 TABLE 1
RIDGELINE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
PROJECT INFORMATION CONTACT/REFERENCE
Project Name: Pleasant Hills Phase 5
Owner: Brian Walker/Jon Warren
Description: The project consisted of the fifth of five phases for the Pleasant Hills planned development in Anderson, California. The fifth phase consisted of 22 lots, which ranged in size from 0.20 to 5.0 acres. The lots were intended to support large custom homes with luxury views. The subdivision is located in terrain with considerable slope issues, which required creative strategies to maximize buildable area, ensure proper utility service, and address stormwater management.
Ridgeline provided services from land planning and entitlements through finished home construction and the marketing and selling of the residential properties.
Jeff Kiser
City Manager
City of Anderson
1887 Howard Street
Anderson, CA 95661
(530) 378-6650
[email protected]
Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
27 Table 2 contains a list of similar projects that align with the scope requirements in the Request for Proposal, wherein PACE provided professional services in the recent past.
TABLE 2
PACE RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
PROJECT INFORMATION CONTACT/REFERENCE
Project Name: Alize Phase 1 – Planned Development
Owner: Jaxon Enterprises
PACE Project Manager: Seth Petrie
Description: The project consisted of the first of three phases for the Alize Planned Develepmont in Redding, California. The Development was intended to be the complement to the Stanford Hills subdivision to the south. The first phase consisted of the northern extension of Santa Cruz Place to support four new lots, which ranged in size from 0.77 to 2.98 acres. The lots were intended to support large custom homes with luxury views. The subdivision is located in terrain with considerable slope issues, which required creative strategies to maximize buildable area, ensure proper utility service, and address stormwater management. This included the use of sewer lift stations and force mains. Stormwater management was designed using Low Impact Development (LID) strategies to meet City of Redding MS4 requirements.
PACE provided civil engineering and surveying services from preparation and approval of the Tentative Map to the finished construction and Final Map approval.
Construction was completed in 2018.
Jack Baker
Jaxon Enterprises
1643 Tahoe Court
Redding, CA 96003
(530) 241-2112
[email protected]
Leonard Bandell
Jaxon Enterprises
[email protected]
Project Name: Jackson Meadows
Owner: Jackson Meadows, LD
PACE Project Manager: Seth Petrie
Description: The project consists of a 65-lot subdivision in Red Bluff, California. The subdivision is intended to support smaller homes to address the lack of available housing in Red Bluff. Lots range in size from 500-9,600 square feet. The subdivision is located in terrain with considerable slope, wetland encroachments, and storm drainage issues. Creative strategies to maximize buildable area required the extensive use of retaining walls and terraced grading to ensure drainage did not flow off-site and was routed to the city’s storm drain infrastructure at the high end of the development, per development requirements.
PACE provided civil, structural, electrical, and surveying services from preparation and approval of the Tentative Map through City of Red Bluff permit approval in 2020. The project was put on hold due to economic conditions but has recently restarted and is targeting a construction start of mid-2024.
Brian Burke
Jackson Meadows, LP
Praxis Capital, Inc
3550 Round Barn Boulevard., Suite 104
Santa Rosa, CA 95403
(707) 541-0570
[email protected]
Project Name: Rio Subdivision
Owner: D.R. Horton
PACE Project Manager: Troy Jones
Description: The project consists of an existing subdivision that had started construction but was then acquired by D.R. Horton. After acquisition, D.R. Horton required modifications to meet the requirements of their proposed housing elements.
This required the regrading of substantial parts of the subdivision as well as addressing groundwater and storm drainage issues. As a majority of the subdivision infrastructure had been completed, this required creative solutions to meet the client’s needs while adapting to existing conditions.
PACE provided civil engineering and construction surveying services from grading redesign through final construction. Construction will be completed in late 2023.
Bonnie Chiu
D.R. Horton CAZ, Inc.
2260 Douglas Boulevard., Suite 110
Roseville, CA 95661
(916) 297-4461
[email protected]
Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
28 Ridgeline Builders Group, Inc.
Ridgeline is currently completing their latest subdivision and have the ability to commit to delivering this project. Based on our experience with developing similar projects, we would expect once we are awarded the project that we would sit down with City staff to determine a critical path project schedule that works for all stakeholders and accounts for any client review periods.
PACE Engineering, Inc.
PACE’s Civil Engineering Department has the ability to commit design resources to focus on this project and its deadlines. Our multi-discipline capabilities, and being a firm of over 75 employees, give us a unique ability to rapidly apply the required resources to all phases of design and construction management.
Brian Walker - Ridgeline
As Developer and Project Coordinator, Brian will provide overall coordination with the project team and stakeholders. Brian will provide full-time oversight, coordination and management for the project, and will be primarily responsible for coordinating the construction team. Brian will offer his insight and creative design solutions throughout the project to ensure that the City receives a design that meets their expectations.
Seth Petrie - PACE
As Principal-In-Charge, Seth will provide coordination with the project team and stakeholders. Seth will offer his insight and creative design solutions throughout the project to ensure that the City receives a design that meets their expectations. Seth will also manage the Quality Control Program and will oversee the project team and facilitate communications with the City to ensure this project meets the functional, financial, and schedule needs.
Troy Jones - PACE
As Design Project Manager, Troy will provide full-time oversight, coordination, and management for the project, and he will be primarily responsible for coordinating the design team. He will oversee the project drafting process, track workflows, and work directly with Seth in coordination of the consultant drawings. His responsibilities will also include consultant coordination and facilitation of client meetings and management of stakeholder needs.
35% Expected
Time on Project
35% Firm
Availabilty
35% Expected
Time on Project
90% Firm
Availabilty
90% Expected
Time on Project
Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
29 Ryan Turner/David Phanthavady - PACE
As Civil Design Leads, Ryan and David will be primarily involved in developing the design concepts for the project. They will also ensure early design decisions are followed as the design progresses, including oversight during construction documents to assist in detailing and specifications of key design elements. They will carry on through the duration of the project, helping to design and produce all project deliverables.
Guy Walfoort - Ridgeline
As Construction Project Manager, Guy will assist in full-time oversight, coordination, and management of both infrastructure and vertical construction phases. He will be responsible for coordinating with the construction team, and subcontractors and communicating with the design team. He will oversee the construction process, track workflows, and work directly with Brian and Seth in coordination of the consultant drawings.
Jon Warren - Ridgeline
As a Partner/Construction Administrator, Jon will assist Brian and the project team through all phases of the development. This includes coordination with the development team, project design team, regulatory agencies, as well as construction management and administration. Jon will also assist, along with Ridgeline’s marketing team, with the acquisition and home building phase.
90% Expected
Time on Project
75% Expected
Time on Project
90% Expected
Time on Project
Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
30 PROJECT PLANNING AND CONTROLS
We propose to plan and control the project using a collaborative approach. As we have noted before, the schedule of this project will be the most critical element. Keeping lines of communication open with project stakeholders will be key. We would expect once we are awarded the project that we would sit down with City staff to determine a critical path project schedule that works for all stakeholders and accounts for any client review periods. We will provide a project schedule that will identify not only anticipated durations for deliverables, but also key decision-making points for the City.
We also propose to conduct bi-weekly virtual status meetings in addition to key deliverable review meetings. These quick status meetings will allow us to keep the City apprised of our project progress, as well as identify and manage any issues that may arise.
Our team has extensive experience in the design, construction administration, and construction phases of the project. Ridgeline also brings the unique contractor perspective, which will allow us to integrate constructability reviews into our design review process. PACE has a proven track record of producing clear, accurate, and coordinated construction documents. This will be a key element in reducing both stakeholder and City approval times as well as time spent during the construction phase coordinating RFIs and change orders.
Using a well-defined QA/QC plan, we will conduct thorough quality assurance reviews for code compliance, consultant coordination, and constructability. We will utilize Bluebeam Revu Sessions to track and address stakeholder comments throughout the design phase of the project.
This will allow us to quickly and efficiently address review comments from the design and development team as well as coordinate review comments and input from the City and other regulatory agencies.
In addition to Ridgeline’s role as Construction Manager, PACE will provide construction management support. During the construction phase of the project, we will have a regular on-site presence to ensure quality. Ridgeline will be coordinating and managing the construction efforts, while PACE will be coordinating the labor code compliance efforts. PACE has extensive experience with publicly funded projects that require prevailing wage monitoring and labor code compliance. By providing these services in-house along with our engineering expertise, we can further reduce coordination time required by not bringing in a separate consultant.
For a project of this scope and size, the timeline to complete this project is severely impacted.
We have developed a tentative schedule to complete the project in the allotted time frame. This schedule makes significant assumptions about the input from stakeholders, which will affect the critical path of the project. We are also proposing a modification to the start of construction date of May 15, 2024, as stated in the RFP. Based on our estimate for the time required for the construction phase, and the phased approach to clearing and grubbing, we estimate that construction can start in late August/early September and still meet the current timeline requirements.
Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
31 Following is a detailed breakdown of our proposed schedule:
PROJECT SCHEDULE
Item Task Name Duration
(days)
Start
Date
End
Date
1 Copper Heights Subdivision 669 1/3/24 11/2/25
2 Site Assessment and Conceptual Design 53 1/3/24 2/25/24 3 Authorization to Proceed (assumes earlier start date than proposed 1/30) 1 1/3/24 1/4/24 4 Kick-off Meeting 1 1/5/24 1/6/24
5 Site Assessment and Research 7 1/8/24 1/15/24
6 Land Acquisition 30 1/3/24 2/2/24
7 Prepare Topographic Survey and Boundary 30 1/7/24 2/6/24 8 Conduct Geotechnical Investigation 40 1/7/24 2/16/24
9 Conceptual Design Drawings 30 1/22/24 2/21/24
10 Prepare Conceptual Design Construction Cost Estimate 2 2/21/24 2/23/24 11 Review Conceptual Design Drawings with City Staff 1 2/23/24 2/24/24 12 Authorization to Proceed to Design Development 1 2/24/24 2/25/24 13 Design Development 102 2/25/24 6/6/24
14 Prepare 30% Preliminary Drawings 14 2/25/24 3/10/24
15 Review 30% Design Drawings with City Staff 1 3/10/24 3/11/24 16 Prepare 60% Preliminary Drawings and Construction Cost Estimate 14 3/11/24 3/25/24 17 Review 60% Design Drawings with City Staff 1 3/25/24 3/26/24 18 City to Provide Environmental Conditions for Review and Incorporation 7 3/26/24 4/2/24 19 Prepare 90% Preliminary Drawings 14 4/2/24 4/16/24
20 Review 90% Design Drawings with City Staff 1 4/16/24 4/17/24 21 Prepare and Submit Drawings to Regulatory Agencies for Review 30 4/17/24 5/17/24 22 Prepare and Submit Preliminary Plans for Clearing, Grubbing, and Grading Permit 2 5/17/24 5/19/24
23 City Review for Clearing and Grubbing Permit 10 5/19/24 5/29/24 24 Prepare Tentative Map (TM) Application Package 14 5/1/24 5/15/24 25 Board of Administrative Review 14 5/15/24 5/29/24
26 City Review and Approval of TM with Conditions of Approval 7 5/29/24 6/5/24 27 Authorization to Proceed to Construction Documents 1 6/5/24 6/6/24 28 Construction Documents 94 6/6/24 9/8/24
29 Receive and Incorporate TM Conditions of Approval and Regulatory Agency Input 3 6/6/24 6/9/24
30 Prepare 50% Design Drawings and Specifications 28 6/9/24 7/7/24 31 Review 50% Design Drawings with City Staff 1 7/7/24 7/8/24 32 Coordinate Final Stakeholder Input and Approvals 14 7/8/24 7/22/24 33 Prepare 90% Drawings, Specifications, and Construction Cost Estimate 21 7/22/24 8/12/24 34 Review 90% Design Drawings with City Staff 1 8/12/24 8/13/24 Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
32 PROJECT SCHEDULE
Item Task Name Duration
(days)
Start
Date
End
Date
35 Submit Plans for Improvement Plans 2 8/13/24 8/15/24 36 City Permit Review 14 8/15/24 8/29/24
37 Prepare Final Design Drawings, Specifications, and Construction Cost Estimate 7 8/29/24 9/5/24
38 100% Construction Documents Submittal 3 9/5/24 9/8/24 39 Bidding 10 6/10/24 6/20/24
40 Bidding for Clearing and Grubbing (if Bidding Phase is required) 0 6/10/24 6/10/24 41 Bid Coordination and Council Approval (if Bidding Phase is required) 0 6/10/24 6/10/24 42 Bidding for Balance of Work (if Bidding Phase is required) 0 6/10/24 6/10/24 43 Bid Coordination and Council Approval (if Bidding Phase is required) 0 6/10/24 6/10/24 44 Bid Award 10 6/10/24 6/20/24
45 Construction 480 7/10/24 11/2/25
46 Prepare Labor Code Compliance Documentation 5 7/10/24 7/15/24 47 Conduct Pre-Construction Conference 1 7/10/24 7/11/24 48 Clearing and Grubbing (start of Phase 1 construction) 7 7/10/24 7/17/24 49 Excavation (~150,000 CY) 30 7/17/24 8/16/24
50 Storm Drain, Minus Detention 60 8/16/24 10/15/24
51 Sewer (start of Phase 2 construction) 6 5/1/25 5/7/25 52 Water 35 5/1/25 6/5/25
53 Dry Utilities 28 6/5/25 7/3/25
54 Clean Up from Utilities 7 7/3/25 7/10/25
55 Make Grade for Curb and Gutter 7 7/10/25 7/17/25
56 Haul In Base 14 7/17/25 7/31/25
57 Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalks, Minus Corners 14 7/31/25 8/14/25 58 Utility Testing 2 8/14/25 8/16/25
59 Finish Base 7 8/16/25 8/23/25
60 Curb and Gutter Corners 14 8/23/25 9/6/25
61 Paving 5 9/6/25 9/11/25
62 Streetlights and Utility Boxes 14 9/11/25 9/25/25
63 Landscaping 14 9/25/25 10/9/25
64 REU, Barricades, and Clean Up (Substantial Completion) 14 10/9/25 10/23/25 65 Prepare Final Map Documents 28 7/1/25 7/29/25
66 Submit Final Map Package 3 7/29/25 8/1/25
67 City Review for Final Map 30 8/1/25 8/31/25
68 Coordinate Stakeholder Signatures and Approval 30 8/31/25 9/30/25 69 Project Closeout 10 10/23/25 11/2/25
Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
RESPONSIBLE PERSONNEL AND RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
33 The key items to note are those highlighted in orange and yellow. These are key decision points and schedule triggers that will dictate project progress. The items noted in orange are trigger points for the City. As the City will be coordinating the required environmental reviews, it is critical this process be completed as quickly as possible. The results of the NEPA and CEQA processes, and any resulting wetlands identified, will impact the layout of the subdivision. The review and approval periods and processes by the City will also be critical to project success. We are assuming that only one formal review will be required, as City input should be provided throughout the milestone review processes. Items highlighted in yellow are trigger points for other regulatory agencies. Review periods of these agencies will also affect the critical path of the project and keeping to the proposed schedule. All efforts will be made to include all stakeholders throughout the design process to attempt to reduce review and approval time.
While we have provided an aggressive schedule for completing the project within the allotted time frame, we want to also emphasize the City should make all attempts to obtain an extension on the funding deadline. While we can account for the efforts of our team, all projects encounter potential issues that can set back the schedule. This project has very little, if any, schedule contingency.
Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
FINANCIAL VIABILITY OF DEVELOPER
34 CONSTRUCTION BUDGET
Several elements contribute to the project, including budget considerations for off-site land acquisition potential, road and utility lineal footage without lot frontage, features like potential detention ponds with size and location considerations, necessary crossings based on topography, prevailing wage factors, and the on-site park build out. Utilizing recent similar projects as a reference, we estimate the following project budget:
Project Element Estimated Cost
Project Management and Coordination $400,000
Construction Observation (if required) $300,000
Construction – Infrastructure (incl. engineering) $15,600,000 Construction – Recreation (park, trails, etc.) $1,500,000 Project Subtotal: $17,400,000.00
Contingency (10%): $1,740,000.00
Project Total (2025 Dollars): $19,140,000.00
Based on grant requirements, we are assuming that daily construction observation will be required and provided by the City Inspection Department. Should the City not have the available resources, our team can provide site observation. Should the City be providing observation as the grant recipient, this item could be excluded from our project budget.
RIDGELINE’S FINANCIAL VIABILITY
Ridgeline is currently building homes in Anderson and west Redding just outside of the city limits.
Ridgeline is in good standing with all local, state, and federal agencies. Our financial strength has supported all of our subdivisions’ development phases to date. With annual sales ranging from $7-$11M over the last five years and a strong balance sheet and local banking partner, we will continue to build on our foundation. We remain without any suspensions, bankruptcies, or loan defaults in our history.
Ridgeline is owned by Brian Walker (70%) and Jon Warren (30%). It is a California S corporation and a licensed general contracting company managed by Brian Walker. Mr. Walker has maintained his Class B General Contractor’s License for nearly 20 years, remaining active and bonded. In addition to Ridgeline’s financial strength, Mr. Warren has supplemented the financial backing of the subdivision projects to date. With over $9M in recently completed development work, Ridgeline has the financial stability for this project.
Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
SUBDIVISION ACQUISITION AND BUILD OUT
35 SUBDIVISION ACQUISITION
One of the key goals of the project is to provide affordable housing. To be able to provide affordable housing, the construction of the homes needs to be as cost effective as possible. The best path to keeping the construction costs manageable would be to maximize the number of lots in addition to the grant-required 120 lots and for Ridgeline to acquire the resulting parcels from the City and proceed with a typical privately funded development. The infrastructure project is publicly funded and thus requires prevailing wage rates for construction activities. As the vertical construction phase will not be part of the infrastructure grant, we believe the City has discretion in their approach to the disposition of the parcels. If the City were to remain as the landowner and fund the home building phase, prevailing wage rates for construction activities would also be required, which would drastically raise the cost of construction. We propose that Ridgeline acquire the parcels from the City for no fee prior to commencement of vertical construction. The transaction would not be considered a gift of public funds but an offset for the lost revenue that Ridgeline will incur during the sale of homes in the subdivision. Typical publicfunded prevailing wage costs will prevent meeting affordability goals. Ridgeline proposes to forego their typical profit margin on the WHUs. In addition, the value of the remaining market rate lots will be reduced by the appraisal comps from the WHUs. As 51% of the parcels will be encumbered by restrictive covenants for the selling of the homes to those making 80% AMI, the lots will have a depressed value. In addition, Ridgeline will make less revenue off of the approximate 61 lots than in a market rate transaction. We propose that the sum total of lost revenue on the homes sales along with Ridgeline possibly volunteering to forego its typical overhead profit on the infrastructure phase would pay for the lots within the development.
To guarantee that affordable housing units will be
constructed, marketed, and sold per the
requirements of the grant, we propose to include
restrictive covenants on a minimum of 61 WHUs,
which will be recorded as part of the Final Map. The
WHUs will be identified on a map, and we commit to
disperse them equally throughout the subdivision.
We commit to a density of no more than two
contiguous WHUs.
Once Ridgeline acquires the parcels within the
subdivision, construction will commence with
vertical construction. With Ridgeline being a home
builder as well as a developer, the same team can be
engaged for the home building phase. Ridgeline has
an extensive catalog of floorplans to choose from,
ranging from about 1,200 to over 2,000 square feet.
Ridgeline assists new homeowners through all stages of the home buying process, from financing through delivery of keys. See Appendix C for marketing material prepared for the Pleasant Hills subdivision.
Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
SUBDIVISION ACQUISITION AND BUILD OUT
36 Ridgeline also commits to a standard
of excellence in home construction
and offers a robust warranty program.
Ridgeline has a dedicated marketing
team, which works in close
collaboration with the construction
team to ensure a smooth home
buying process. Ridgeline’s marketing
team includes:
Jennifer Walker
Jennifer Walker is one of the preeminent
realtors within Shasta and surrounding
counties. She has over thirteen years of
experience in the real estate field within
Redding. No one knows Redding quite like
Jennifer, being proud to call the City her
birthplace and home. Jennifer has received
numerous accolades for her hard work,
perseverance, and tenacity. She has been
named both Top Producer and Multi-Million
Dollar Producer on more than one occasion.
Jennifer finds it a joy to buy and sell homes
in the place she adores and has watched
blossom and evolve over her lifetime.
Ann Walker
Ann Walker’s work envelops you with each tour of a Ridgeline model home. Driven by creativity and originality, Ann takes pride in providing the premier interior design for your dream home.
Not only has Ann contributed to the warm and inviting décor at Ridgeline, but her work can also be found throughout Shasta County and beyond. She established her design business, Interior Designs by Ann Walker, over twenty-five years ago. Ann found her calling for helping others while working in the banking industry for thirty years before embarking on her true passion for creative arts. She helped many clients finance their homes and now she helps adorn them. She is excited that her career has come full circle.
Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
UNIQUE ADDITIONS PROVIDING ADDITIONAL BENEFIT TO THE CITY 37 UNIQUE ADDITIONS
The unique additions that we propose to bring to the project will all be in an effort to make the development feel more like a neighborhood than a typical subdivision development. The unique nature of this project provides an opportunity where profits are not the main driver but where we can develop a robust community in north Redding. Most subdivisions are developed with adding the maximum available lots that a development can fit, with little thought to making the subdivision integrate naturally with the surrounding area or providing benefits to the residents beyond merely a place to live.
This development, as well as the surrounding neighborhoods that will be impacted by this project, would best be served by the addition of access into the area from Quartz Hill Road. The addition of a roadway to the north side of the parcel would ensure that the River Ridge Terrace and Park subdivisions will not be saddled with the vehicular traffic that will result from this development. This will also serve to increase traffic capacity in times of emergency, such as wildfires. To provide an additional point of access into the neighborhood, Ridgeline proposes to privately acquire the parcel directly north of the subject parcel, which has direct access to Quartz Hill Road. This parcel is located outside the city limits but is zoned commercial per the Shasta County General Plan. Ridgeline intends to deed a street right-of-way to Shasta County to provide access to the parcel as well as develop the parcel for new commercial business opportunities in the north Redding area. This area is predominantly rural residential and would benefit economically from new businesses getting established in the area. Should the parcels ever be annexed into the city limits, the City would see tax revenue benefits as well.
Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
UNIQUE ADDITIONS PROVIDING ADDITIONAL BENEFIT TO THE CITY 38 One of the hallmarks of the north Redding area are the views and surrounding recreation. The views of this proposed development will now be shared by those with the means to buy a home in this upscale area as well as LMI individuals who may not have ever been given an opportunity.
Redding is also an active community, with many residents enjoying the myriad of sports and recreational opportunities available; however, one of the biggest issues of recreational use is the lack of access. Most of the premier locations and trails require driving. We propose to provide those recreational opportunities right within the subdivision, with the option to connect to existing facilities. To provide robust recreational opportunities, Ridgeline proposes a subdivision concept that will incorporate a new park within the development. The proposed subdivision will also include dedicated bike lanes, walking trails, and potential connection to existing bike trails.
The FB Trail is located approximately 0.5 miles from the subject development, which would allow access to the Keswick Trail and Sacramento River Trail systems. As avid local trail users and supporters, we expect to be able to work with Redding Trial Alliance (RTA) to enhance local trail connections to the proposed Copper Heights subdivision. The subdivision will utilize separated, meandering sidewalks to add a natural element to pedestrian access.
To promote a natural feel within the subdivision, we propose other amenities such as roads with landscape islands separating the two-way traffic along main access roads in and out of the development. We will also incorporate monument signs to signify the naming of the subdivision.
These signs will incorporate design cues from the City’s design language to acknowledge the forward-thinking efforts by the City to obtain funding and its use in a new and creative way to promote community development.
Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
APPENDIX A
RESUMES
Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) ROLE
Ridgeline Builders Group, Inc.
Owner/Developer
Project Lead
PROFESSIONAL LICENSE
Class B General Contractors License
BRIAN WALKER
Owner/Developer
OVERVIEW
Recognizing the permanence of his creations, Brian
emphasizes the importance of design, aesthetic appeal, and quality that withstands the test of time. His dedication to building not just homes, but lasting community fixtures, showcases a commitment to excellence in residential
development.
When Brian founded Ridgeline, it was his mission to create a tradition of top-quality construction throughout the entire building process as well as an unparalleled attention to detail. All his contractors have been carefully selected to make sure that they are able to uphold that mission, and make sure that they build a premier product for a
competitive and affordable price.
KEY PROJECTS
Mr. Walker has been involved in the following Ridgeline Builders projects:
• Pleasant Hills Phase 1
• Pleasant Hills Phase 2
• Pleasant Hills Phase 3
• Pleasant Hills Phase 5
• Elk Crest Subdivision
• The Vistas acquisition
Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) ROLE
Ridgeline Builders Group, Inc. Partner
Construction Manager and Administrator
JON WARREN
Construction Adminstrator
OVERVIEW
Collaborative, strategic, and solutions-oriented business operator with over 30 years of experience in construction and service industries across the western United States of America. Provides leadership and expertise on all aspects of operations. Redding/Anderson-based business for the past 23 years.
Current operations with Ridgeline include two active
subdivisions located in the greater Redding, California, area.
Other relevant projects:
• In 2022, completed entitlement of 25-unit Greenfield
apartment development in Chico, California, later
repurposed for HUD project.
• Recently received construction plan approval for the
six-story Graduate Student Apartment project in
downtown Chico, California, near the University.
Interest began in 2017. We formally engaged with the
project in 2018, received entitlement approval in
2020, and moved into Construction Document Phase.
KEY EXPERIENCE
Mr. Warren’s experience includes the following:
• Pleasant Hills Phase 1
• Pleasant Hills Phase 2
• Pleasant Hills Phase 3
• Pleasant Hills Phase 5
• Elk Crest Subdivision
• The Vistas acquisition
• Engaged in residential construction of single-family
homes and commercial work for Jeffers Construction
across California, Nevada, and Arizona.
• Mountain Air Group began land development and
single-family home construction in 2004.
• Alder Creek formed to focus on building a residential rental portfolio, many of which required major
construction repairs and maintenance.
• Founder of LinkUs Enterprises, a multi-state, regional service provider installing Dish Network/Ontech
Smart Services in the west to residential and
commercial properties.
Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) ROLE
Project Manager
GUY WALFOORT
Construction Project Manager
OVERVIEW
Four years after moving to Shasta County in 1985, Guy began his career in the construction industry. He has been fortunate to have hands-on experience in multiple building trades. In 2002, Guy expanded his career to construction management.
He joined the Ridgeline team in 2018 as Project Manager, supervising all new builds.
KEY PROJECTS
Mr. Walfoort has been involved in the following Ridgeline Builders Group, Inc. projects:
• Pleasant Hills Phase 1 • Pleasant Hills Phase 2 • Pleasant Hills Phase 3 • Pleasant Hills Phase 5 • Elk Crest Subdivision • The Vistas acquisition Packet Pg. 713 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) SETH A. PETRIE
Principal Engineer
ROLE
Principal-in-Charge
Project Manager
Civil Engineer
EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Chico, 2003
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
California, Civil Engineer, 2008
MEMBERSHIPS
American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE)
California Stormwater Quality
Association (CASQA)
OVERVIEW
Mr. Petrie has been a member of the PACE Engineering team since 2005 and is a principal shareholder in the firm. He is the head of PACE’s Land Development Department and has well-rounded experience in land development and municipal engineering.
Mr. Petrie has experience in the following areas:
• Land Development
• Subdivision Design and Site Planning
• Hydrology and Stormwater Quality Analysis
• Commercial Site Design
• Storm Drain Collection System Design
• Water Distribution and Sewage Collection Design
• Flood Elevation Analysis and Certification
• GIS Infrastructure Mapping
KEY PROJECTS
Land Development Planning and Design
Mr. Petrie has been a Project Engineer and Project Manager involved in all phases of land development planning and design. This work has involved representation of clients with municipal agencies, obtaining government approvals, design of roads, drainage systems, water distribution systems, and sewer collection systems.
Grading and Utility Design/Site Development
Mr. Petrie has been a Project Engineer and Project Manager for the development of grading and utility plans for various private, commercial, and institutional site development projects. These projects have covered a wide cross-section of uses including retail commercial, office complexes, apartments, medical facilities, schools, water and wastewater treatment plants, tank sites, and treatment ponds.
City Engineering Services
Mr. Petrie is currently acting as City Engineer for the Cities of Anderson, Yreka, Weed, Mt. Shasta, and Dunsmuir and Siskiyou County.
Mr. Petrie has been involved with design and project management responsibilities on the following PACE Engineering projects:
• Fall Creek Water Improvement
• Anderson Wastewater Treatment Plant; Yreka Wastewater Treatment Plant
• Dunsmuir Road Rehabilitation; Vista Drive Rehabilitation • Summerfield Meadows, Rocky Ledge Estates, McCloud
Meadow Ranch, Jordan Manor, Airpark Manor, and Jackson
Meadows Subdivisions; Alize Planned Development
• College of the Siskiyous Master Plan and Parking Lot Rehabilitation • Pit 3 Reach 2020 Road Evaluation; Pit 3/4/5 Traffic Use Survey and Road/Capacity Use
• American Valley Community Services District GIS; City of Yreka GIS • Shasta College Infrastructure Upgrade
Packet Pg. 714 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) TROY M. JONES
Senior Engineer
ROLE
Civil Engineer
EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, University of
California, Chico 1995
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
California, Civil Engineer, 1999
MEMBERSHIPS
American Society of Civil Engineers,
Past President - Shasta Branch
EXPERIENCE
Mr. Jones has been a member of the PACE Engineering team since 1995. He is a shareholder in the firm and has well-rounded experience in surveying, land development, and utility design. His varied areas of expertise include:
• Site Grading and Utility Design
• Subdivision Planning and Design
• Storm Water Sewage Collection and Water Distribution
Systems
• FEMA Flood Elevation Determinations and Certificates
• Qualified Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Developer and Practitioner (QSD & QSP)
KEY PROJECTS
Mr. Jones has engineered site grading and utility plans, including topographic mapping and earthwork modeling, for schools, office complexes, commercial developments, and individual property owners. Representative projects include Churn Creek Retail, Shasta College Health and Science University Center, West Venture Medical Office Building, College of Siskiyou’s Science Building, and Tehama County Administration Building.
As a Project Engineer and Project Manager, Mr. Jones has been involved in all phases of subdivision planning and design. He has prepared tentative and final maps, road designs, drainage systems, water distribution systems, sewer collection systems, as well as represented clients to municipal agencies and obtained government approval.
Working with both the private and the public sectors, Mr. Jones has provided engineering design services for a variety of infrastructure such as storm water and sewer collection system, water distribution, and storm water management systems.
Mr. Jones has provided FEMA flood elevation information for a variety of projects. This includes applications for Flood Elevation Certificates and Letter of Map Amendments (LOMA) for individual property owners and flood elevation determinations for the City of Red Bluff Bidwell Sewage Pump Station, Bella Vista Water District Welch Water Pump Station, and Shasta Baptist Church and School.
Packet Pg. 715 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) ROLE
Staff Engineer
EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Chico, 2020
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
California, Civil Engineer, 2023
California Stormwater Quality
Association, QSP/QSD, 2023
FAA, Part 61, Private Pilot
License, 2016
FAA, Part 107, UAS License, 2021
MEMBERSHIPS
American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE)
California Stormwater Quality
Association (CASQA)
RYAN A. TURNER
Staff Engineer
OVERVIEW
Mr. Turner has been a member of the PACE Engineering team since 2022. He has experience in the following areas:
• Land Development
• Land Surveying and Photogrammetry
• Hydraulic Analysis
• Geodetic Mapping
• Grading Analysis
• Commercial Site Design
• Erosion/Sediment Control and MS4
• Pressurized Water Transmission and Distribution
KEY PROJECTS
Mr. Turner has been assisting with engineering and surveying services on the following PACE projects:
• Modoc Medical Center
• Mountain View Middle School Admin Building
• Shasta College Campus Infrastructure Improvements
• Gerber Elementary Campus Infrastructure Improvements
• Tree of Life Charter School Classroom Improvements
• Westhaven CSD Wells and Pipe Project
• Moody Creek Drive Water Main Replacement
• PLAs within Shasta County (including lot mergers)
• FEMA Elevation Certificates
EXPERIENCE PRIOR TO JOINING PACE
W. Gilbert Engineering, Chico, CA
Staff Engineer/Crew Chief (Land Development/Survey), 2020-2022 • Residential surveys and engineering design for the
rehabilitation of Paradise, CA after the Camp Fire.
• Design/development of single- and multi-family projects within Butte County.
Converse Construction, Redding, CA
Engineer Intern, 2014-2020
• Traffic control diagrams and erosion sediment control plans to assist in construction.
KPFF, Roseville, CA
Survey Intern, 2020
Packet Pg. 716 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) ROLE
Staff Engineer
EDUCATION
BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Chico, 2020
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
California, Engineer-in-Training,
2020
MEMBERSHIPS
American Society of Civil Engineers
(ASCE)
DAVID PHANTHAVADY
Staff Engineer
OVERVIEW
Mr. Phanthavady has been a member of the PACE Engineering team since 2021. He has experience in the following areas:
• Land Development
• Commercial Site Design
• Subdivision Design and Site Planning
• AutoCAD Civil 3D
• Hydrology Analysis
KEY PROJECTS
Mr. Phanthavady has been assisting with engineering services on the following PACE projects:
• City of Weed Vista Drive Rehabilitation
• Caterpillar Road Tenant Improvement
• Rio Subdivision
• Maas Energy Works Office Development
• Sky View County Water System Improvement
• Weed Union Elementary School
• Shasta College RPSTC Phase 3
• City of Weed Boles Creek Stormwater Improvement
• City of Dunsmuir Tank Relocation and Replacement
OTHER RELEVANT EXPERIENCE
Prior to working for PACE, Mr. Phanthavady was employed with Department of Water Resources (Surface Water Investigation section in Red Bluff, California) and Forest Service (engineer section in Alturas, California).
Packet Pg. 717 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) LAURIE E. McCOLLUM
Principal Engineer
ROLE
Water and Wastewater Engineer
EDUCATION
MS, Environmental Engineering
Sciences, University of Florida,
2012
BS, Mechanical & Aeronautical
Engineering, University of
California, Davis, 2004
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
California, Civil Engineer, 2011
MEMBERSHIPS
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Water Works Association
American Public Works Association
California Water Environment
Association
Tau Beta Pi
OVERVIEW
Ms. McCollum has been a member of the PACE Engineering team since 2006. She is a member of the Board of Directors and a principal shareholder in the firm. She has experience in the following areas:
• Water and Sewer Modeling Software, including H₂ONET,
H₂OMAP, InfoWater, and InfoSewer
• AutoCAD Software, including Land Desktop & Architectural Desktop
• Arc GIS Software
• Water Distribution, Municipal Water Wells, Sewage
Collection System, and Wastewater Treatment Plant Design • Construction Observation for Water and Sewer Projects • Funding Applications for grant/loan programs including State Water Resources Control Board Clean Water and Safe
Drinking Water State Revolving Fund Programs, USDA Rural Development, California Department of Water Resources
Integrated Regional Water Management Grant Program, and Community Development Block Grant Program
• Wastewater Dilution Studies, Master Plans, Facility Plans, Preliminary Engineering Reports for Water and Wastewater Projects, Pollution Prevention Plans, Antidegradation
Analyses, Reports of Waste Discharge, Wastewater
Treatment Plant Performance Evaluations, Best Practicable Treatment or Control Reviews, Salinity Evaluation and
Minimization Plans, Biosolids Disposal Plans, Groundwater Evaluation Reports, Toxicity Reduction Evaluation Work Plans, Assessment District Engineer’s Reports
KEY EXPERIENCE
Ms. McCollum has been involved with the design responsibilities on the following PACE Engineering projects:
• Cottonwood Water District Well #1 Replacement Project • Burney Water District Well 9 Planning and Design Project • Burney Water District Collection System Improvement Project • City of Williams Water System Improvement Project
• Shasta County Service Area 17 Cottonwood Sewer Master Plan, Rate Study, Report of Waste Discharge, and Wastewater Treatment Plant and Collection System Improvement Project Design and Construction
• Burney Water District Master Sewer and Water Plans and Rate Studies
• Rio Alto Water District Wastewater Treatment Plant and Constructed Wetlands Project
• City of Williams Collection System Improvement Project Planning • City of Williams Well 11 Improvement Planning and Design Project • Shasta County Service Area No. 2 Sugarloaf Water System Improvement Project
• Shasta County Service Area No. 6 Jones Valley Water Meter Replacement and SCADA Improvement Project
Packet Pg. 718 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) GRANT A. G. MAXWELL
Senior Engineer
ROLE
Water and Wastewater Engineer
EDUCATION
MS, Environmental Engineering,
California State University,
Sacramento, 2014
BS, Civil Engineering, California State
University, Chico, 2007
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
California, Civil Engineer, 2011
MEMBERSHIPS
American Public Works Association
American Society of Civil Engineers
California Water Environment
Association
American Water Works Association
OVERVIEW
Mr. Maxwell has been a member of the PACE Engineering team since 2008 and is a shareholder in the firm. He has experience in:
• Project Management
• CWSRF/DWSRF Planning Grant
• Water and Sewer Modeling Software, including H₂ONET,
H₂OMAP, InfoWater, and InfoSewer
• AutoCAD Software, including Land Desktop, Architectural Desktop, and Map3D
• Arc GIS Software
• Water Distribution, Sewage Collection System, Wastewater Treatment, and Water Treatment Design
• Land Surveying
• Construction Observation Experience for Water and Sewer Projects
KEY PROJECTS
Mr. Maxwell has been involved with planning design and/or construction observation responsibilities on the following PACE Engineering projects:
• City of Mt. Shasta State-Mandated Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Improvement Project
• City of Mt. Shasta Tank 1 and Roseburg Improvements
• City of Dorris Wastewater Treatment and Collection System Improvements
• American Valley CSD Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Improvements
• City of Weed Boles Fire – Water System Repair and
Compliance Upgrades
• County of Shasta Landfill Drainage Pump Station
• Susanville Sanitary District Filtration and UV Disinfection Project
• Shasta CSD/COR Intertie Pump Station Project
• City of Mt. Shasta Supply Line Replacement Project
Mr. Maxwell has developed master water and/or sewer utility plans for Centerville CSD, City of Dunsmuir, City of Mt. Shasta, Shasta CSD, and the City of Yreka. He has also prepared numerous preliminary engineering, feasibility, and alternative analysis reports.
EXPERIENCE PRIOR TO JOINING PACE ENGINEERING
Prior to working for PACE, Mr. Maxwell was employed with Pilot Engineering, a civil engineering firm in San Bernardino, California, and Mendenhall Construction, a construction contractor in Red Bluff, California.
Packet Pg. 719 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) ROLE
Principal-in-Charge
Project Manager
Structural Engineer
EDUCATION
MS, Civil Engineering, University of
California, Davis, 2012
BS, Architectural Engineering, California
Polytechnic State University, San Luis
Obispo, 2010
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
California, Civil Engineer, 2013
California, Structural Engineer, 2017
MEMBERSHIPS
Structural Engineers Association
of Northern California
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Institute of Steel
Construction
SHAWN J. WADE
Principal Engineer
OVERVIEW
Mr. Wade has been a member of the PACE Engineering team since 2014. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a principal shareholder in the firm. He has experience in the following areas:
• AutoCAD and REVIT software
• Structural analysis using RISA-3D, ETABS, and SAP
computer software
• Structural design of concrete, timber, steel, and masonry structures
• Architectural and structural design of commercial,
residential, and municipal structures
• Preliminary engineering reports
• Division of the State Architect (DSA) and California’s Department of Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) regulated projects
• Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings
KEY PROJECTS
Halsey Afterbay Trash Rake Safety Improvements
In order to improve safety, PG&E wanted to install a trash rake at Halsey Afterbay in order to clean the trash rack. Mr. Wade provided the engineering and design to modify the existing intake structure to support the new trash rake. In addition, he prepared specifications and worked closely with the vendors of the new trash rake and gate house structure.
Pit 3 and Rock Creek Powerhouses Consolidation and
Modernization Projects
Mr. Wade provided architectural and structural design services for the consolidation and modernization projects at both Pit 3 and Rock Creek Powerhouses. Both powerhouses were improved to include new control rooms, kitchen, bathrooms, offices, and meetings rooms.
Blue Lake Rancheria Hotel Seismic Retrofit
Mr. Wade provided architectural and structural design services to repair both design and construction deficiencies on the four-story wood framed structure (approximately 68,000 square feet).
Repairs included complete renovation of the lateral force resisting system including diaphragms, chords/collectors, shear walls, and foundations.
Butte County Evidence and Morgue Facility
Mr. Wade provided structural engineering services for the new 11,000-square-foot structure. The structure consisted of metal deck over structural steel roof framing and masonry bearing/shear walls. Additionally, Mr. Wade served as the project manager for the PACE team that also included civil, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and technology design services.
Pit 1 Low-Level Outlet Replacement and Cofferdam
Mr. Wade provided structural design for a Cofferdam at the Pit 1 Forebay Dam. The Cofferdam was designed such that only one of the two radial gates would be dewatered at a time to maintain the required in-stream flow releases. Additionally, Mr. Wade prepared several instream bypass schematics to dewater the spillway and facilitate installation of the Cofferdam.
Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) ANTHONY A. BOWSER
Principal Engineer
ROLE
Electrical Engineer
EDUCATION
BS, Electrical/Electronic
Engineering, California State
University, Chico, 2003
PROFESSIONAL
REGISTRATIONS
California, Electrical Engineer,
2006
Washington, Electrical Engineer,
2017
Montana, Electrical Engineer,
2018
Nevada, Electrical Engineer, 2020
MEMBERSHIPS
National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA)
Institute of Electrical and
Electronic Engineers (IEEE)
Tau Beta Pi (TBP)
Eta Kappa Nu (HKN)
OVERVIEW
Mr. Bowser has been a member of the PACE Engineering team since 2003. He is a member of the Board of Directors and a principal shareholder in the firm. He has extensive experience in the electrical design of educational, commercial, healthcare, and municipal facilities.
His areas of experience include:
• Electrical Power Distribution
• Lighting System Design
• Fire Alarm System Design
• Automated Control Systems
• Standby Generating Systems
• Stand Alone and Utility-Interactive Photovoltaic (PV) Design • Protective Device Studies and Arc Flash Hazard Analysis • Conformance to California Energy Commission, HCAI, DSA, and LEED Standards
KEY EXPERIENCE
Electrical Power Distribution and Lighting System Design Mr. Bowser provides the power distribution and lighting system designs for facilities such as schools, healthcare facilities, water treatment plants, commercial/retail centers, and apartment complexes. Power distribution design encompasses the coordination with electric utility for service, one-line diagram, complete panelboard schedules, and load calculations in accordance with the authority having jurisdiction. Lighting system design includes interior and exterior lighting control, calculations in accordance with 2019 Title 24, photometric studies, and conformance to LEED standards.
Fire Alarm System Design
Mr. Bowser provides the fire alarm system design for facilities such as schools, healthcare clinics, hospitals, and commercial/retail centers.
Fire alarm system design consists of a riser diagram, complete voltage drop and battery calculations in accordance with NFPA 72, and compliance with DSA and HCAI requirements.
Automated Control Systems
Mr. Bowser has vast experience in developing control systems for various pumping stations and water treatment plants. The control systems design typically includes logic diagrams, automated operation with PLCs/RTUs, radio communications, design of the SCADA system, and creation of functional descriptions detailing the facility’s automated operation.
Separately Derived System Design
Mr. Bowser provides field studies and designs for separately derived systems such as generators (standby and prime power) and PV systems (stand alone and utility interactive). For generators, the scope generally consists of analyzing the facility’s electrical system, determining fuel source and run requirements, load analysis, and transfer switch configuration. For PV systems, the scope typically includes electrical system analysis, utility coordination, component research and selection (modules, inverters, batteries, charge controllers, conductors), one-line and three-line diagrams, and applicable system calculations.
Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) ROLE
Electrical Engineer
EDUCATION
BS, Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Oregon State University, Corvallis, 2014
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
California, Electrical Engineer, 2018
MEMBERSHIPS
Institute of Electrical and Electronic
Engineers (IEEE)
BRYAN M. BARNES
Associate Engineer
OVERVIEW
Mr. Barnes has been a member of the PACE Engineering team since 2016. He is a shareholder and has extensive experience in the electrical power and lighting, fire alarm, control, and technology design of educational, commercial, industrial, healthcare, and municipal facilities, including:
• Engineering Reports
• Arc Flash Analysis and Protective Device Studies
• Electrical, Fire Alarm, and Technology Drawings and
Specifications
• Start-up, Testing, and Inspection
• Conformance to IES HCAI, DSA, and LEED Standards
• Compliance with California Building, Electrical, Fire Alarm, and Energy Codes
KEY EXPERIENCE
Power
• Electric utility company coordination
• Power system studies
• Load analysis studies
• Building electrical power distribution design
• Medium voltage substation and distribution design
• Emergency, required, and optional generation design
• Photovoltaic solar and battery storage system design
• Electric vehicle charging station design
• Energy code compliance documentation
Lighting
• Interior and exterior building lighting design
• Emergency and egress building lighting design
• Heliport lighting design
• Complete photometric studies
• Specialized lighting selection
• Lighting acceptance testing
• Energy code compliance documentation
Fire Alarm
• Fire pump system design
• Educational, residential, commercial, healthcare, and industrial fire alarm system design
Technology
• Complete technology design for telephone and voice,
data, CCTV, security cameras, access control, speaker,
intercom, public announcement, clock/bell, and
wireless access points
Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) ROLE
Survey Manager
Land Surveyor
EDUCATION
BA, Natural Science,
California State University,
Chico, 2015
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
California, Licensed Land Surveyor,
2008
MEMBERSHIPS
California Land Surveyors
Association (CLSA)
JESSE J. LENAKER
Principal Surveyor
OVERVIEW
Mr. Lenaker has been a member of the PACE Engineering team since 2016 and is a principal shareholder in the firm. Mr. Lenaker has a multifaceted background with experience in ALTA, boundary, topographic, control, residential development, commercial, construction, and public works land surveys. Mr. Lenaker specializes in managing projects requiring advanced techniques, such as GPS/GNSS surveying and statistical network analysis, to perform geodetic and mapping services in both the field and office environments. Additionally, Mr. Lenaker’s expertise includes:
• Aerial and LiDAR Surveying
• Earthwork Analysis/Surface Modeling
• Cadastral Surveying
• Right-of-Way Acquisition
• Legal Description/Exhibit Preparation
• City and District Surveying Services
KEY PROJECTS
As a licensed land surveyor and project manager, Mr. Lenaker has provided support for multiple projects at PACE, including:
• AT&T - Various Projects throughout Humboldt, Shasta,
Siskiyou, and Tehama Counties
• Bella Vista Water District - Various Projects
• Brookfield Renewable - Collett Dam – Monitoring
• Cities of Mt. Shasta, Redding, Weed, and Yreka - Various Projects (including Right-of-Way)
• Coleman National Fish Hatchery - Trapping and Sorting Facility • County of Siskiyou - County Surveyor (contract)
• Iron Mountain Mine - On-Call Survey/Monitoring
• Lewiston CSD - WWTP/Collection System
• Maxwell Public Utility District Well 6 Site - Boundary/Topo • PG&E - Various Projects throughout Alpine, Butte, Humboldt, Placer, Shasta, and Tehama Counties
• Redding Area Bus Authority - Parcel Acquisition
• Redding Rancheria - Topographic Survey for Health Campus • Shasta College - Topographic Survey of Overall Campus • Shasta CSD - Various Projects (including Right-of-Way) • Stewardship Council - Cadastral Surveying Projects throughout Fresno, Lake, Mendocino, Placer, and Shasta Counties
• Tehama County - Bridge Replacement Projects - Columbia Road, Kirkwood Road, and Evergreen Road
• Union Pacific Railroad, Dunsmuir Railyard, Interim Measures • Yuba Water Agency - Lake Francis Dam Survey
Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) ROLE
Licensed Land Surveyor/Assistant
Survey Manager
EDUCATION
AS, AutoCAD/Manual Drafting
High-Tech Institute, 2001
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS
California, Professional Land
Surveyor, 2015
CERTIFICATIONS
30-Hour OSHA Certification
PG&E Hydro Generation Contractor
Safety Training Program
First Aid/CPR
Notary Public (California)
MEMBERSHIPS
California Land Surveyors Association
IGNACIO SANCHEZ
Assistant Survey Manager
OVERVIEW
Mr. Sanchez has been a member of the PACE Engineering team since 2005 and is a shareholder in the firm. He has experience in the following areas:
• AutoCAD Civil 3D and MicroStation CAD Platforms
• Boundary and Cadastral Surveying
• Construction Safety and Compliance
• Construction Surveying
• Easement and Right-of-Way Acquisition
• Legal Description and Exhibit Preparation
• Monitoring and Control Networks
• Property Line Adjustments
• Record of Survey Preparation
• Subdivision and Parcel Map Preparation
• Topographic Surveying
KEY PROJECTS
Mr. Sanchez has provided surveying and technical support for the following PACE Engineering projects:
• AT&T - Right-of-Way Analysis and Permitting Assistance for Various Projects located in Humboldt, Shasta, Siskiyou, and Tehama Counties
• City of Redding - Right-of-Way Mapping for Bechelli Lane ATP and Bechelli Water Main Replacement Projects
• Cottonwood Fire Station - Boundary Survey/PLA
• Pacific Forest and Watershed Lands Stewardship Council - Cadastral Surveying to Assist with Land Transactions
throughout Shasta, Plumas, Lake, and Mendocino Counties • PG&E - Gas Line Encroachment Surveys and Right-of-Way Analysis
• PG&E - Tunnel Inspection Program Survey Support
• PG&E - Pit 1 Powerhouse - Switchyard Improvements
• Shasta County Community Services District - Various Projects • Tehama County - Bridge Replacement Projects, including Evergreen Road, Kirkwood Road, and Columbia Avenue
• Cities of Yreka, Dunsmuir, and Mt. Shasta Sewer Replacement Projects - Survey Support
Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
APPENDIX B
PHOTOS AND PLANS
Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Elk Crest Subdivision, Redding, CA
Aerial View
Examples Homes
Street View Facing Northwest
Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) 1 1
18 LOT 17
1. CT 16
12 1/. 74 X \
12 M 74
12M 74 12 I• 1 74 12 NI 74 FIAR
1 12M 74
1\
ce ca
V
ia,, '
C,
0 I
LOT
g
II or
o ic,vyj
L
r
y
m
vNn
Sin <? INS
A I I LOT 7
f/All BARRICADE
PI.
O. a^
Y sc
AGA551W I 65' T'
a
a--
5® 1// ROAD A' I 1 A
0+ 4 •
M CB Fj
3. 77 rII • rn / Tg' 0,00 I\ I u2q,ti26 56$ 16
V
0+ 21. 25 CR 111111 124
26-8/ 6Z
V
A
A\
23+ 99 86
6+
00'T 31111 I I.
43 00
95'
00 TBC= 563. 1.44 c, NS
L...
V
LOT6
fC
T 21
J. 78
562. 32
TBC6662. 36 -- — — -
APN 110- 16- 02
LOT5 J. GARCIA
3452 ARGYLE RD
REDDING, CA 96002
00' T' I 4. 5® ' i
90' T' 11 23 M 94
Ell - 4. 5o1e
22+ 76 67 • 22+ 74. 90
fiC 560. 71 ___• TBC= 560. 67
23 M 76 I 1
c1? LOT
4 I <<, 25' T'-
4. 50
VIII - 4. 5®
C
zo rn 21 7 , w 4 n i9 . 13 N 1+ 89. 65 m i IHC= 559. 00 L °. A LOT 3 + I 50T'
QC
II rJ 4.5® "
O I
rn\ I'• 3o' 4. 50ICT' I 21+ 15. 67
78C- 55182 REFLE
3- 18 RAKE
UB VVEO LITIES
O
w 1 21+ 04. 40
REFLECT SUN OAKS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS
J. TBC= 557. 68
w IY' 3 I° LOT
2 25 51 V 2
SEE SHEET1 FOR NOTES AND LEGEND
o 65' T'
V. 94
N
co
QQ- Tr fa, + 50' T' El1 —4. 5® f4:;\
g J." NOTICE: CALL 811 I
N
o, 4v Bi T@C? 2-04.5®
P
j
wpm xNixS° 6•\' P' p`
J
o6
6 u
5 6
L gid i ! ,,, e,,
g°' p0 `
g
NOT LESS THAN 48- HOUR NOTICE IS REQUIRED PRIOR
CO I N II ' ,, s,,-d- „: 11 6 .
x,, • 0‘-'•‘.
0,,\k TO STARTING ANY EXCAVATION NEAR UNDERGROUND
Amo +
p o= x1 ti px x0`55 UTILITIES BELONGING TO P. G. & E., PAC BELL, 11 om T• 1' SSG° CITY OF SHASTA LAKE OR CITY OF REDDING oE_ PLEASE CALL, TOLL FREE," ONE CALL" UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT( USA) 1- 800- 227- 2600 wv
8'W E---
Lt C1
02 1.2 12+ 8'
W
N I, CHARTER FACILITIES, CALL( 530) 241- 7300
553 .. 53.-4 9+ 00 10+ 00 V/. 11+ 00 BO
Y'' R,--
A. C. I. D. FACILITIES, CALL( 530) 365- 7329
8' SS\ E)}-- LAVER ST
VISTA WATER DIST. ( 530) 241- 1085
a
a
CLEAR CREEK CSD 530) 357- 2121
0-, 4.,.'
ii.' SD. r4----- sl-----
s!- MARKS CABLE SYSTEMS( 530) 547 5438
ip, .. 1,, v;
SC
MT. GATE C. S. D.( 530) 275- 3002
N
O c° PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF:
C
Oi( Vg LI- 61 CITY
O
r REDDING
o
n0 N6II+
u +
e4,
wss'°
N9 IMPROVEMENT PLANS
LOT ,
s" 9' s=
R:,'`+ am cm ELK CREST ESTATES
74-4,
zarzi S- 2015- 00682
LOT 26 hs,`
9'.
OFCAl1 IT
94o
10' UTILITY COMPOSITE
FR, FOR
MOUNTAIN AIR GROUP LP
GRAPHIC SCALE BY 1 w HITSON ENGINEERING, INC.
t;
g 1035 EUREKA WAY
8'
6 REDDING, CALIFORNIA 96001
Y . 30
inch
FEET)
1 = 40 rt. 530)- 243- 8181 SHEET
DATE: 12- 20- 17 SCALES: VERT 1"= N/
A HORIZ 1"= 40'
2 8
job# Packet Pg. 727 A—27938 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for LCT 21 \ \ \\ \\ LAT 20 \ LOT 19 LOT 18 LOT 17
2M74 12M74 1- 2- 1,174 2M74
LOT) 15 PAR 1 M 114 \\ \\ \\ 2/ IM ,. 1. 1
143
1 x15" oak I
115' 0°
I I
M76 O \\ I
I
11 eS ro
LOT e
Af I III II i
SA<, x26 ook - N
09? il'
Ook \\\ S
I.
I
1 P:" oaks" "...
oak\\
4 s..
ak.••\; - - - I\
X15„
OOh
k
x15" oak
INSTA\
I
I \ i • e,
goo
LOT 7 BARRICADE B. O. O'\'` ---'\
564. 9
AGASSI I \ xclssmh •-
a0
x2/ 1•,' oak 5
I Ip xsw
k\\
8 ROAD ' A' -
II III \\ v` N \\\ 3. 87i
X18*
1A„". r/f: yB4MF — — -
I F-' x1 oak / ''
1 \ \ O / 1 II I\ 11 \\ v //
Oµ \\ x1•,' oak I
1 I
I x 18" o•' o
o0µ . 5I'...• a+
I
1\\ I\ 1 X7"
o.,kl0 y• V ' I ° 6•0" 101' 0 •• \
akx >{,
12" oak It
giySa \
1g
YPl f 6
Ooµ
Io* i° \ 84o x14"°° • • 01
LOT 21 ZO
x.
0oO \
ok
20" o• k
23 M 78 1 " okx x20' o.. 4 \\
I
l// //
I
APN¢ 10- 02
1 V I / LOT 5
3412' ROA 1
563. 3 ARGYLE RD
I 8 \ ING, CA 96002
l\
III 23
x2D" oak
x wr tM
g /
11 1
LOT i1\
6: 1
a / / /
I
1 2.3M94
1 IV
i•
I
I
LOT 22 I
I a
c N 1 3% \
I / A7 /
23 M 78 / 11' 4; i/
I\\
X15" oak 10I + 11 \\ \\ \\ I
I OT 4 5: rA
I\ x.. n. N L \ -\i - _
I m n i& \ 1 a° 7 \ \
i
I M
23 M 94 2) 1 \ 1: \ 1
I I / M \\ \\ 8"^ ak
LOT 3I I I I// IA II \\\ 559. 7
1 w a0 •\ \ I
Y 1
I \ \
I Iv
1\\ I A \
7. 0%,. ,
56. 191f1. 0\ 0' ' \
X I m
I LOT 2 " 1 \ ',, N CCO# 1 10- 3- 18 REMOVED LAVER ST UTILITIES TO I
I
I LOT ` 5/ I \ 558. 4
x 15 Oa N REFLECT SUN OAKS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS
23 y/ 94
I \\\ // / \\\
1 \\\ d\ SEE SHEET FOR NOTES AND LEGEND
r---/\ Pao \
I —- / / 1 /•. D', 0' j' \ g'1 fL \ NOTICE: CALL 811
i/ 1.
CQ \\ NOT LESS THAN 48- HOUR NOTICE IS REQUIRED PRIOR
I
i
I I \-- 1 , I
I
1` ` L px \\ TO STARTING ANY EXCAVATION NEAR UNDERGROUND 0611 ." .V' xw7 _ T40w
6.1°
UTILITIES BELONGING TO P. G. & E., PAC BELL,
N ` ro..-\• w.... m .---_, O CITY OF SHASTA LAKE OR CITY OF REDOING
7.( II-':. y = 4 ' O' I ` PLEASE CALL, TOLL FREE," ONE CALL" UNDER7 9, a 10,.. o ra- 11 004Y+•0
1 00\ --. 7"----- GROUND SERVICE ALERT( USA) 1- 800- 227- 2600 c
x30" oak xcis iVFf
CHARTER FACILITIES, CALL( 530) 241- 7300
QMH E - j
8° ss( E)-- LAYER _---
1 -
T..!.. 11.16-,
A. C. LD. FACILITIES, CALL( 530) 365- 7329
O ice_ ''c x" m — SD
BELLA VISTA WATER DIST.( 530) 241- 1085
x,/-
RVF. am . -'_ mi_ w.--
s
I CLEAR CREEK CSD( 530) 37- 221
I x,,,, ., . 00# X10111 jjik
J
MARKS CABLE SYSTEMS( 530) 547- 5438
II I \ \ No I n \ •. 6BTf• Siti•\ PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF: MT. GATE C. S. D.( 530) 275- 3002iTY oQgN;
SS,°, CITY OF REDDING
1 ' >\ x18" aak \\_—_— I LOT 1 fg ( Mg s yc IMPROVEMENT PLANS I
1 II y% VA\
x20" oak
1\
v vv.
3 xuz,
I
1 1
4,a,,, ,\\ I
s °` P
ELK CREST ESTATES
I So F 559. 0
ovcnr 1\ LOT 26
p
S- 2015- 00682
23 M 94 I I oO+ „ x18" fry \
ar° akx GRADING PLAN
x14• ak R -\\ I \\\ FOR
1 x20" aak MOUNTAIN AIR GROUP LP
I GRAPHIC SCALE q BY
a YI/HITSON ENGINEERING, INC.
LOT ^ vT 1 oTm J `
24 M 32 \\ 1. 1 30 LOT ' B' 6 1035 EUREKA WAY
24 M 30 \
IN FEET) REDDING, CALIFORNIA 96001
A A \
V
A, v,
t inch= 40 ft. 530)- 243- 8181 SHEET
DATE: 12- 20- 17 SCALES: VERT 1"= N/ A HORIZ 1"= 40' 3 8 job# Packet Pg. 728 A- 27939 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Pleasant Hills and Vistas Subdivisions, Anderson, CA
Aerial View Facing Northeast
Aerial View Facing South
Arch Culvert Drainage Crossing
Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 730
Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Alize Unit 1, Redding, CA
Aerial View Facing South
Street View Facing North
Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
SANTA CRUZ DRIVE
SUTRO MINE ROAD
1 2
3 4
5 6
7 8
9 36 37
710 720
730
740
750
760
770
720
730
740
750
760
760
770
756 758
762 764
766
768
772
774
776 A
5 213.09' 120.57' 112.82' 132.07'
361.66'
156.70' 199.62'
162.48'
379.78'
305.91'
352.87' SANTA CRUZ PL. 0+00 1+00
2+00
3+00 3+50
-2.0%
-2.3%
-2.1%
-2.4%
770
750 720
740 750 742 744
774
766 760
FG 765.37
FG 763.96
FG 762.99
FG 763.79
FG 762.99
FG 750.47
FG 749.20
FG 746.96
FG 747.03
FG 748.87
FG 750.47
FG 722.20
FG 719.80
FG 719.80 FG 722.20
FG 759.60
FG 758.99
FG 762.00 FG 762.00
FG 760.53
190.11' 238.57'
61+50
55+60
56+00
57+00 58+00
59+00
60+00
61+00
25' TRANSITION
FG 750.47
FG 750.47
FG 752.68
FG 752.02 B
5 NO CONSTRUCTION
IN WETLANDS AREAS
(INTERMITTENT CREEKS
OR SEEP AREA) AREA DRAIN, STA 56+61 RIM EL 750.60
FL EL 749.60
INV EL 24" 744.60
SEE REMOVE (E) TIMBER
BARRICADE
CULVERT HEADWALL W/ 5'x10' RIPRAP @ OUTLET, SEE
50 LF RETAINING WALL, HEIGHT VARIES 1-5'
65 LF RETAINING WALL, HEIGHT VARIES 1-5' 30 LF 24" SD, S=2% MIN, CLASS 'A' BACKFILL AREA DRAIN STA 56+61 RIM EL 750.60 FL EL 749.60
INV EL 24" 744.00
SEE 15 LF 24" SD, S=2% MIN, CLASS 'C' BACKFILL 2:1 SLOPE, TYP
INTERMITTENT CREEK
SEEP AREA
INTERMITTENT CREEK
(E) SD CB
INV. 771.00
(E) SD CB
INV. 763.25
60'x40' T-SHAPED
TURNAROUND OR
EQUIVALENT. NO
OBSTRUCTIONS IN
THIS AREA, SEE 60'x40' T-SHAPED
TURNAROUND, SEE DRIVEWAY W/ CULVERT, SEE 1
5 8
4 1
5 5
5 5
5 4
5 740
750
760
770
780
790
740
750
760
770
780
790
55+50 56+00 753.80 753.856+50753.1 753.0857+00753.9 753.8657+50756.1 756.1058+00 758.01 758.058+50 760.81 760.859+00 765.49 765.559+50769.3 769.2760+00770.3 770.27 -2.70%
8.34% 4.00%
50' VC
PVI ELEV = 768.26 PVI STA = 59+10 HIGH POINT STA = 59+35 HIGH POINT ELEV = 769.26 BVCS 58+85 BVCE 766.17 EVCS 59+35 EVCE 769.26 100' VC
PVI ELEV = 749.61 PVI STA = 56+86
LOW POINT STA = 56+61
LOW POINT ELEV = 750.63 BVCS 56+36 BVCE 750.96 EVCS 57+36 EVCE 753.78 GB STA 55+72.54 EL. 752.68 EG @ CL OF ROAD
FG @ CL OF ROAD
FG @ CL OF ROAD
EG @ CL OF ROAD
(4) 2" PRIVATE SS FM INV
(N) 24" HDPE SD MATCH (E) GRADE
EL. 769.33± ELEVATION ELEVATION
720
730
740
750
760
720
730
740
750
760
0+00752.80+50 749.62 749.01+00 743.76 741.01+50 737.76 732.22+00731.1 731.762+50 725.83 727.83+00723.13+50720.4 -2.64%
-12.00%
-5.26%
50' VC
PVI ELEV = 751.30 PVI STA = 0+37 HIGH POINT STA = 0+12 HIGH POINT ELEV = 751.96 BVCS 0+12 BVCE 751.96 EVCS 0+62 EVCE 748.30 50' VC
PVI ELEV = 723.96 PVI STA = 2+65
LOW POINT STA = 2+90
LOW POINT ELEV = 722.64 BVCS 2+40 BVCE 726.96 EVCS 2+90 EVCE 722.64 EG @ CL OF D/W
FG @ CL OF D/W
FG @ CL OF D/W
EG @ CL OF D/W
DATE CKDDRN DES JOB NO. SIGNED SHEET NO DATE REVISIONS
0" 1" BAR IS ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING
IF NOT ONE INCH ON THIS
SHEET, ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY. PACE
ENGINEERING
REDDING, CALIFORNIA
SANTA CRUZ PLACE PROFILE
SCALE: H 1" = 50' V 1" = 10'
09/28/17 2
ALIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT GRADING PLAN & PROFILES
0038.78
SP FL SP UNIT 1
PG 2 OF 8
Chapter 16.12.20(B): Responsibility of Permittee. The permittee and his agents shall carry out the proposed grading in accordance with the approved grading plans and specifications, the conditions of the grading permit and the requirements of this chapter and all other applicable laws and regulations. The permittee and his agents shall maintain all required protective devices and temporary drainage devices during the progress of the grading work and shall be responsible for observance of hours of work, dust controls, and methods of hauling. The permittee and his agents shall be responsible for maintenance of the site until such time as a letter of completion has been issued by the Public Works Director. The permittee and his agents shall become subject to the penalties set forth in this chapter in the event of failure to comply with this chapter and other applicable provisions of this code. No approval shall exonerate the permittee or his agents from the responsibility of complying with the provisions and intent of this chapter. Chapter 16.12.120(F): Conduct of Grading Operations. No person shall excavate or fill so as to cause rocks, soil or debris in any form to fall, or slide, or flow onto adjoining properties of public property. Any debris deposited on adjoining properties or public property shall be removed by the permittee. Chapter 16.12.120(M3): Grading and clearing operations shall be conducted in conformance with the applicable permit requirements of the State Department of Fish and Game, the Regional Water Quality Control Board, and all other state and federal agencies having jurisdiction. GRADING IS RESTRICTED TO APRIL 15 TO OCTOBER 15 OF ANY YEAR, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED ON GRADING PERMIT. GRADING SHALL NOT OCCUR IN AREAS DEPICTED AS OPEN SPACE. PLANTING SHALL CONFORM TO SECTION 16.12.180 OF THE GRADING ORDINANCE. IF HYDROSEEDING CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISHED BY OCTOBER 15, 1992 DUE TO WEATHER CONDITIONS, THEN PERMITTEE SHALL HAND SEED ALL CUT AND FILL SLOPES AND HAND PLACE A 3-INCH THICK MAT OF STRAW OR GRASS HAY OVER THESE SLOPES. ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE IN PLACE BY OCTOBER 15, REGARDLESS OF WEATHER CONDITIONS OR STATUS OF GRADING OPERATION, PRIOR TO CONTINUING GRADING NOTES: THE FOLLOWING ARE EXCERPTS FROM THE REDDING MUNICIPAL CODE: APPROXIMATE GROSS EARTHWORK QUANTITIES (NEAT LINE) 3,600 CY - CUT 3,500 CY - FILL
THESE QUANTITIES ARE BASED ON NEAT LINE CALCULATIONS AND
DO NOT INCLUDED SHRINKAGE, SWELLING, OR TRENCHING AND
FOOTING SPOILS. THE ESTIMATED QUANTITIES ARE FOR BUDGETARY PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATION OF EARTHWORK QUANTITIES.
LOT 3 DRIVEWAY PROFILE
SCALE: H 1" = 50' V 1" = 10'
GRADING AND DRAINAGE NOTES: 1. ALL GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISH GRADES. ALLOW FOR VARIOUS
THICKNESSES OF BASE, PAVING AND CONCRETE IN PREPARING
SUBGRADE. 2. HOT MIX ASPHALT (HMA) SHALL CONFORM TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, TYPE A, 3/4-INCH MAXIMUM SIZE AGGREGATE. ASPHALT BINDER SHALL BE PG 64-28. 3. AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE 3/4" CLASS 2 AGGREGATE BASE PER STATE SPECIFICATIONS, SECTION 26. COMPACT TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DENSITY PER AASHTO T-180. 4. STORM DRAIN PIPE SHALL BE HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) WITH SMOOTH INTERIOR AND CONFORM WITH AASHTO M294 OR APPROVED EQUAL. 5. NO WORK IS ALLOWED IN THE DESIGNATED WETLAND AREAS.
Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request 61+00
62+00 SANTA CRUZ DRIVE
W W
W W W
SUTRO MINE ROAD
W W
W 1
4 SS
SS
(N) SSMH, STA 59+35 RIM EL 769.18
INV FM IN 767.78
INV 8" OUT 767.61
SEE
SS SS SS
SS
SS SANTA CRUZ PL. (N) 2" BLOWOFF, STA 56+25, SEE 5
4 61+50
55+60 56+00 57+00 58+00
59+00
60+00
61+00 4 - 2" SS FORCE MAIN
FROM INDIVIDUAL
LIFTS STATIONS, SEE
(N) FH, STA 56+40
SEE 4
4 (N) COMBINATION
VALVE, SEE
(N) 8" PVC WATER 6
4 (N) WM, TYP
SEE 1
4 (N) SS FM POC, TYP 3
5 REMOVE (E) CAP AND BLOWOFF. CONNECT (N) 8" W
TO (E) 8" W W/ RFCA CONNECT (N) 8" SS
TO (E) 8" SS MAIN,
INV 765.26 7
4 10' PSE, TYP BOTH SIDES
SEE
FG 752.02 1
~
(N) POSTAL DELIVERY UNIT
(E) 8" W
R225' ELEVATION ELEVATION
730
740
750
760
770
780
790
730
740
750
760
770
780
790
-2.70%
8.34% 4.00%
55+60753.056+00753.8 746.8856+40 743.82 753.256+80 743.61 753.157+20754.8 746.2857+60 750.01 756.658+00758.0 753.7458+40759.9 757.4758+80 761.20 763.459+20767.9 764.9359+60 765.88 769.760+00 765.72 770.360+40769.6 765.5660+80770.5 765.4061+20771.261+60 -10.00%
-0.40%
9.32%
106' VC
PVI ELEV = 740.78 PVI STA = 56+61
LOW POINT STA = 56+63
LOW POINT ELEV = 743.34 BVCS 56+08 BVCE 746.08 EVCS 57+14 EVCE 745.72 380 LF 2" PVC SCH 40 PRIVATE FORCE MAIN 180 LF 8" PVC SS (4) 2" PRIVATE
SS FORCE MAIN INV, TYP
FG @ CL ROAD
EG @ CL ROAD, TYP CONNECT (N) SS
TO (E) SS, INV 765.26
(N) 24" SD MAINTAIN
6" MIN CLEARANCE TO
(N) WATER & SEWER
(N) 2" SS
INV EL, TYP
(E) 15" SD, MAINTAIN 6" MIN CLEARANCE
(N) 8" SS
INV EL
SS MH - STA 60+09 RIM EL 770.13
INV 8" IN 767.33
INV 8" OUT 765.67 RAISE (E) 8" W TO MAINTAIN 6" MIN CLEARANCE FROM (N) 8" SS, SEE
SS MH - STA 60+05 RIM EL 769.18
INV 2" FM IN 766.15
INV 8" SS OUT 765.98 R/W
LOTS 1,4 POC APPROX. 2'-8" COVER
LOT 2 POC
LOT 3 POC
(N) 8" W 3" MIN COVER
1 ~
(N) BLOWOFF
DATE CKDDRN DES JOB NO. SIGNED SHEET NO DATE REVISIONS
0" 1" BAR IS ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING
IF NOT ONE INCH ON THIS
SHEET, ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY. PACE
ENGINEERING
REDDING, CALIFORNIA
09/28/17 3
ALIZE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT UTILITY PLAN
0038.78
SP FL SP UNIT 1
PG 3 OF 8
SEWER & WATER UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS SHALL COMPLY WITH CITY OF REDDING CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS. 2. WATERLINES SHALL HAVE 36" MINIMUM COVER AND ARE TO BE UNDER STORM DRAIN PIPES AND OVER SEWER PIPES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. 8-INCH WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE PVC (C900) AWWA DR18 (CLASS 150) OR EQUAL. WATER SERVICE LINE SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC OR EQUAL. 4. SEWER FORCE MAIN PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC OR EQUAL. ALL OTHER SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE SDR 26. 5. THRUST BLOCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL ELBOWS, TEES, BENDS AND DEAD ENDS ALONG THE WATER LINE. SEE 6. ALL UTILITIES TO USE CLASS 'A' BACKFILL, PER
7. LOTS 1, 2, 3, & 4 REQUIRE PRIVATE LIFT STATION SEPTIC TANK EFFLUENT PUMP SYSTEMS AND BACKFLOW PREVENTERS.
SEWER PROFILE
SCALE: H 1" = 40' V 1" = 10'
2 4 2
5 1 NTS ~ UTILITY CROSSING DETAIL
(N) 8" 45° ELB
(E) 8" PVC W
20 LF (N) 8" DI W
CENTERED OVER SS RAISE (N) 8" W TO ACHIEVE 6" MIN CLEARANCE TO (N) 8" SS APPROX 2'-8" COVER
(E) GRADE
(E) 8" PVC W
TO BE REMOVED
(N) 8" SS
(N) 8" RFCA (N) 8" RFCA
(N) 8" DI SPOOL
(N) 8" DI SPOOL
(N) 8" 45° ELB
Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request Jackson Meadows Subdivision, Red Bluff, CA
Street View of Snow Mountain Way Road Connection
Subdivision Marketing Layout
Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) (E) 8W (E) 8W (E) 8W (E) 8W (E) 8W (E) 8W
W
W (E) 12W (E) 12W (E) 12W (E) 12W (E) 12W (E) 12W (E) 12W (E) 12W (E) 12W (E)SS (E)SS (E)SS (E)SS (E)SS (E)SS (E)SS (E)SS (E)SS (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G (E)G O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H O/H (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD
PHASE 1 PHASE 3
PHASE 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
22 21 23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
31 34
35 36
37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
56 55 54 62 61 60 59 58 57
63 64
65 X X SNOW MOUNTAIN WY
PROPOSED ROAD B PROPOSED ROAD B SOUTH JACKSON STREET
PROPOSED ROAD B
8 SS 8 SS 8 SS 8 SS 8 SS 8 SS 8 SS 8 SS 8 SS 8 SS 8 SS 8 SS 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS
8 W
8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W
8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W
8 W
8 W
8 W
8 W
8 W
8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W 8 W
W W
W W W W
W W
W W W
W W W W W W W W W W
W W
W W
W W W W W W
W W W W W W
W W W W W
E E E
E
E E
W W W
W
W
W W W W W W W W W W W W
(N) CAV, TYP
SEE
(N) CAV, TYP
SEE
(N) SSMH, TYP
SEE
(N) 8" WV
SEE
E
E
(N) 8" PVC
SS, TYP 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS
(N) 8" PVC W, TYP
(E) 12" W
(E) 48" SD
(E) 8" SS
(N) 45° FLG
ELB
(N) 45° FLG
ELB
(N) 22.5° FLG ELB'S
(N) 11.25° FLG
ELB
(N) 22.5° FLG
ELB
(E) RESIDENCE 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 55+00 56+00 57+00 58+00 32+00
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00
14+00
15+00
16+00
17+00
18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00
26+00 25+00 28+00 27+00 30+00 29+00
31+00
(E) WM &
VALVE AC4
SEE 3C4
SEE 2C4
SEE 1C4 3C18 4C17 3C19 3C19
(N) CAV, TYP
SEE 3C19 18 SD 18 SD
24 SD 24 SD 24 SD 24 SD 24 SD
18 SD 18 SD 18 SD 18 SD 18 SD
12 SD 12 SD 12 SD
18 SD
18 SD
18 SD 18 SD 18 SD 18 SD 18 SD 18 SD 18 SD
SD
SD
24 SD
24 SD
24 SD
24 SD W (E)E (E)E (E)E (E) ELEC TO BE RELOCATED
UNDERGROUND ALONG
PROJECT FRONTAGE. SEE PG&E PLAN FOR DESIGN. (N) FH, TYP SEE 8C18
10 SS 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS 10 SS W W 12 SD W (N) 45° FLG
ELB
(N) 45° FLG
ELB
12 SD 12 SD
12 SD
12 SD
12 SD
12 SD
12 SD
12 SD
12 SD
SD
(N) CAV, TYP
SEE 3C19
6' ℄6' (N) PVC
SS MAIN
(N) PVC WATER MAIN 6' MIN 3' MIN
60' R/W
JOINT UTILITY
TRENCH, TYP
SEE
(N) HDPE SD
5C20
SHEET DATE CKD
DRN DES JOB NO. SIGNED
BAR IS ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING
IF NOT ONE INCH ON THIS
SHEET, ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY. PACE
ENGINEERING
REDDING, CALIFORNIA C4
JACKSON MEADOWS SUBDIVISION OVERALL UTILITY PLAN
1919.02
SP FL SP SOUTH JACKSON STREET, RED BLUFF, CA
9/1/20 PG 6 OF 24 100% CD'S
REVISIONS
NO DATE DESCRIPTION
LINE LEGEND
(E) WATER MAIN
(N) WATER MAIN
(N) WATER SERVICE
(E) STORM DRAIN
(N) STORM DRAIN
(E) SANITARY SEWER
(N) SANITARY SEWER W
WS
(E)W
(E)SD
SD
(E)SS
(N) 8" FLGxMJ GV
(N) 12"x8" FLG RED
(N) 12" RFCA
(N) 12" RFCA
(N) 12" FLG TEE W/ THRUST BLOCK
(E) 12" PVC W
(E) 12" PVC W
(N) 8" PVC W
(N) 8" PVC W
(E) 8" PVC W
(N) 8" RFCA
(N) 8" FLG GV
REMOVE (E) BLOWOFF, CUT BACK (E) W TO PL
(N) 8" PVC SS
(E) 8" PVC SS
(E) 8" PVC SS
(E) SSMH RIM EL 319.92
INV 311.42 (N) 8" IN N
INV 311.42 (E) 8" IN E
INV 311.31 (E) 8" OUT S A
NTS C4
TYPICAL UTILITY LOCATIONS C4 1 NTS C4 WATER CONNECTION DETAIL C4 2 NTS C4 WATER CONNECTION DETAIL C4 3 NTS C4 SEWER CONNECTION DETAIL C4
UTILITY PLAN
1"=50'
UTILITY PLAN NOTES: 1. SEE PG&E PLANS FOR ELECTRIC AND GAS UTILITIES NOT SHOWN. 2. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR IRRIGATION UTILITIES NOT SHOWN. 3. SEE LIGHTING PLAN FOR STREET LIGHT UTILITIES NOT SHOWN. 4. SEE STORM DRAIN PLAN FOR INFORMATION NOT SHOWN, SHEET C12. 5. THRUST BLOCKS OR RESTRAINED MECHANICAL JOINTS SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL ELBOWS, TEES, BENDS AND DEAD ENDS ALONG THE WATER LINE. SEE DETAILS 5 & 6, SHEET C18 FOR THRUST BLOCK DETAILS AND DETAIL 7, SHEET C18 FOR RESTRAINED
JOINT DETAIL.
(N) 8" 45° FLG ELB W/ THRUST BLOCK
SS
9/1/20
Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request 320 325 330
330 321321 322 321 322 322
323 323 323 327 326 324
327328328
328
329
329
331331
320
325
321322
323 324
326 328
327 330
330
335 335
330
335
338
339
339
337
338
320
325
319
321
322
323
324
325
321
321 322
323
323
323
324
326
327
321 321
320 321
321
322
323
324
325
322 323
324
326
327
330
329
331
325
330
330
326
327 328
329
326
327
328
329
320 320 321 322 323 324
325 326
327 328 329 329
330 328 329 331
320
318
319
321
E E E
E
E E E 50+00 51+00 52+00 53+00 54+00 55+00 56+00 18 SD 18 SD 24 SD 24 SD 24 SD 24 SD 24 SD
18 SD 18 SD 18 SD 18 SD 18 SD
12 SD 12 SD 12 SD
18 SD
18 SD
18 SD 18 SD 18 SD 18 SD 18 SD 18 SD 18 SD
SD
SD
24 SD
24 SD
24 SD
24 SD (E)E (E)E (E)E 12 SD
12 SD 12 SD
12 SD
12 SD
12 SD
12 SD
12 SD
12 SD
12 SD
SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD (E)SD
(E)SD
(E)SD
PHASE 1 PHASE 3
PHASE 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
22 21 23 24
25 26
27 28
29 30
32 31 33
34 35
36 37 38
39 40
41 42
43 44
45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
56 55 54 62 61 60 59 58 57
63 64
65 X X SNOW MOUNTAIN WY
PROPOSED ROAD B PROPOSED ROAD B SOUTH JACKSON STREET
PROPOSED ROAD B
0+00
1+00
2+00
3+00
4+00
5+00
6+00
7+00
7+85.80
0+00 1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00 6+00 7+00 8+00
8+34.20
5+62.45
0+00
1+00 2+00 3+00 4+00 5+00
LOTS 21-31, REAR DRAINING
BOUNDARY LOT, SEE 2C5
TYPICAL INTERIOR
LOT, SEE 3C5
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00
14+00
15+00
16+00
17+00
18+00 19+00 20+00 21+00 22+00 23+00 24+00
26+00 25+00 28+00 27+00 29+00
30+00
31+00
32+00
PROPERTY BOUNDARY, TYP
EG 22.5±
EG 23.2±
EG 23.5±
EG 23.5± EG 23.3±
EG 23.9±
EG 22.9± EG 22.7±
EG 25.2±
EG 20.3±
EG 19.6±
EG 21.5±
EG 22.0±
EG 21.8±
EG 21.1±
EG 21.4± EG 20.3± EG 19.7± EG 21.1± EG 20.6± EG 20.0± EG 27.8± EG 26.4± EG 25.1± EG 24.1± EG 22.3± EG 21.6± EG 31.3± EG 31.7± EG 31.0± EG 29.3± EG 29.5±
EG 29.5±
EG 31.2±
EG 30.4±
EG 30.6±
EG 30.8±
EG 29.0± EG 30.6±
EG 24.6±
EG 20.9± EG 22.3±
EG 22.7± RET WALL
EG 30.7±
EG 30.3±
EG 29.4±
EG 26.9±
EG 21.4±
EG 21.1±
EG 21.4±
EG 21.8±
EG 22.4±
(E) RESIDENCE
(E) POOL 0+00 1+00 1+75.17 0+00
1+80 1+00
LOTS 18-20, FRONT DRAINING
BOUNDARY LOT, SEE 1C5
LOTS 1-8, FRONT DRAINING
BOUNDARY LOT, SEE 1C5
LOTS 9-14, REAR DRAINING
BOUNDARY LOT, SEE 2C5
AC13 DETENTION BASIN OUTLET STRUCTURE, SEE 6C16
EG 22.3±
EG 22.1±
FG 27.05
FG 27.21
FG 27.00
FG 26.41
FG 25.82
FG 25.11
FG 24.01
FG 24.42
FG 24.27
FG 25.73
FG 25.64
FG 23.55
FG 24.11
FG 24.12 FG 23.78 FG 23.45 FG 25.37 FG 24.78 FG 24.45 FG 26.31 FG 27.36 FG 28.49 FG 29.76
FG 30.22
FG 29.79
FG 29.79 FG 30.19
FG 29.31
FG 23.28
FG 22.02 FG 22.32 FG 22.47 FG 22.02 FG 21.85 FG 26.68 FG 26.20 FG 22.76 FG 29.67 FG 28.66 FG 27.60 FG 32.16 FG 32.11 FG 30.85 FG 31.50 FG 25.50
FG 25.54
FG 27.60 FG 28.16
FG 28.51
FG 29.71 FG 28.38
FG 32.83
FG 32.88
FG 31.39
FG 28.27 FG 27.59 FG 27.28 FG 26.98
FG 31.14 FG 32.63
FG 32.54 FG 30.00 FG 30.00
FG 29.10
FG 27.05
FG 27.19
FG 25.30 FG 26.00
FG 27.00
FG 26.00
FG 28.50
FG 30.20
FG 30.29
FG 30.55
FG 30.84 FG 29.65
FG 29.79
FG 23.45 FG 23.97
FG 23.93
FG 23.14 FG 22.94 FG 22.94 FG 25.09 FG 23.81 FG 23.47 FG 27.67 FG 26.62 FG 25.68 FG 28.68 FG 31.00 FG 32.45 FG 30.98 FG 29.76 FG 28.71 FG 27.77 FG 27.27 FG 27.04 FG 26.82 FG 26.59 FG 26.37 FG 26.16 FG 25.10 FG 24.55 FG 25.20 FG 25.35 FG 25.60
FG 28.58 FG 28.83 FG 28.68 FG 28.39 FG 28.10 FG 27.80 FG 27.49 FG 27.18 FG 26.88 FG 26.57 FG 26.26 FG 25.54 FG 24.45 FG 24.12 FG 23.78 FG 26.31 FG 25.35 FG 24.78 FG 27.36 FG 28.36 FG 31.39FG 31.80FG 30.57 FG 28.42FG 27.37FG 26.43FG 25.84FG 23.06FG 22.72FG 22.39FG 22.19FG 22.19FG 22.89 FG 30.31
FG 29.40
FG 26.07FG 25.84FG 25.62 FG 27.02FG 26.52FG 26.29 FG 28.97FG 27.96 FG 27.32FG 27.01FG 26.29 FG 28.24FG 27.93FG 27.63 FG 28.85FG 28.55 FG 29.15 FG 29.42 FG 29.52 FG 29.42
FG 29.51 FG 29.20 FG 28.90 FG 28.59 FG 28.28 FG 27.98 FG 27.67 FG 27.36 FG 23.83 FG 26.57 FG 25.23 FG 24.92 FG 24.61 FG 26.15 FG 25.84 FG 25.53 FG 26.76 FG 26.46 FG 22.22 FG 22.90
FG 21.94
FG 28.95
FG 28.55
FG 27.60
FG 27.79
FG 26.90
FG 23.95 FG 23.47
FG 24.24
FG 25.41
FG 25.35
FG 23.44
FG 23.23 FG 23.50
FG 30.17 FG 31.78 FG 30.28
FG 24.57
FG 24.38
FG 23.87
FG 24.44
FG 25.26
FG 25.40 FG 25.42
FG 25.24
FG 25.24
FG 25.37
FG 25.24
FG 26.45 FG 26.15 FG 25.71 FG 26.77 FG 27.06
FG 27.19
FG 26.47
FG 25.47
FG 24.78
FG 26.18FG 25.87FG 25.33 FG 26.46 FG 26.60 FG 26.26
FG 25.16
FG 23.81
FG 23.19
FG 23.75
FG 23.97
FG 25.12
FG 25.51
FG 23.45 FG 23.36
FG 24.46
FG 23.70
FG 25.30
FG 25.13 FG 24.99
FG 24.58
FG 24.66
FG 24.14
FG 15.26
FG 15.12
FG 15.26
FG 15.39
FG 23.16
FG 23.26
FG 23.26
FG 23.39
FG 23.39
FG 23.25
FG 24.96 FG 23.46
FG 24.96
FG 22.54
FG 24.46
FG 23.97
FG 23.52 FG 22.94 FG 23.09
FG 22.44 FG 22.02
FG 22.62
FG 22.14
FG 21.88
FG 21.70
FG 21.70
FG 22.96
FG 24.28 FG 23.83
FG 23.24
FG 23.67
FG 24.18
FG 23.97
FG 25.17
FG 24.97
FG 23.39
FG 24.84
FG 25.55
FG 25.35
FG 25.12
FG 24.84
FG 22.89 FG 24.95
FG 24.07 DETENTION
BASIN
0+00 1+00 2+00 2+85.84 20' LOT DEPTH VARIES (SEE SITE PLAN) 20' PL R/W
1.5% TYP VARIES
(1.5% MIN) 1.5% TYP
KEYSTONE RET WALL, HEIGHT VARIES, SEE
SHEET S1.0 GRADED PAD
EG, TYP
FACE FTG
6" OFF PL, TYP
20' LOT DEPTH VARIES (SEE SITE PLAN) 5' PL R/W
1.5% TYP VARIES
(8% MAX
1.5% MIN)
VARIES (2:1 MAX) 20' GRADED PAD
1.5%
TYP
EG, TYP
20' LOT DEPTH VARIES (SEE SITE PLAN) 20' PL R/W
1.5% TYP
KEYSTONE RET WALL, HEIGHT VARIES, SEE SHEET S1.0 VARIES (1.5-5%) VARIES
(1.5-5%) GRADED PAD
6" CURB & GUTTER W/ PRIVATE 12" HDPE SD
10' PUE
EG, TYP
FACE FTG
6" OFF PL, TYP
SHEET DATE CKD
DRN DES JOB NO. SIGNED
BAR IS ONE INCH ON ORIGINAL DRAWING
IF NOT ONE INCH ON THIS
SHEET, ADJUST SCALES ACCORDINGLY. PACE
ENGINEERING
REDDING, CALIFORNIA C5
JACKSON MEADOWS SUBDIVISION OVERALL GRADING PLAN
1919.02
SP FL SP SOUTH JACKSON STREET, RED BLUFF, CA
9/1/20 PG 7 OF 24 100% CD'S
REVISIONS
NO DATE DESCRIPTION
APPROXIMATE GROSS EARTHWORK QUANTITIES
(NEAT LINE) 21,500 CY - CUT 11,300 CY - FILL
THESE QUANTITIES ARE BASED ON NEAT LINE CALCULATIONS AND DO NOT INCLUDED
SHRINKAGE, SWELLING, OR TRENCHING AND
FOOTING SPOILS. THE ESTIMATED QUANTITIES ARE FOR BUDGETARY PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR DETERMINATION OF EARTHWORK QUANTITIES.
GRAPHIC SCALE
0 1 IN = 50 FT 50 100
1 NTS C5
FRONT DRAINING LOT GRADING DETAIL C5 3 NTS C5
TYPICAL INTERIOR LOT GRADING C5 2 NTS C5 REAR DRAINING LOT GRADING DETAIL C5
TYPICAL LOT GRADING - FRONT DRAINAGE NTS
TYPICAL LOT GRADING - REAR DRAINAGE NTS
5' 5' POTENTIAL "KEYSTONE" TYPE RETAINING WALL, 1' TO 3' HIGH, SEE SHEET C11 1.5%
POTENTIAL "KEYSTONE" TYPE RETAINING WALL, 1' TO 3' HIGH, SEE SHEET C11
5' 5' 1.5%
1.5%, TYP1.5%, TYP
1.5%, TYP1.5%, TYPCURB & GUTTER
9/1/20
Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request Rio Subdivision, Redding, CA
Aerial View Facing South
Aerial View Facing North
Street View of Grading Operations
Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) D
SD SD SD SD SD SD
WV
WVWV
WV WV
WV
DY H WV
D
Y H WV
DY H WV
D
Y H WV
SD SD SD
SD
SD SD
SD
SD SD SD
SD WV
WV
WV WV
WV
WV WV
D
Y H WV LOT 6 FF = 481.30 PAD =480.47
W W E
W E
E W W
W LOT 7 FF = 481.10 PAD =480.27 LOT 8 FF = 480.80 PAD =479.97 LOT 9 FF = 480.40 PAD =479.57 LOT 10 FF = 480.40 PAD =479.57 LOT 11 FF = 480.10 PAD =479.27 LOT 5 FF = 481.60 PAD =480.77 LOT 4 FF = 481.90 PAD = 481.07 LOT 3 FF = 482.00 PAD =481.20 LOT 2 FF = 481.50 PAD = 480.67 LOT 1 FF = 479.80 PAD = 478.97 LOT 12 FF = 480.70 PAD =479.87 LOT 13 FF = 481.00 PAD =480.17 LOT 14 FF = 481.30 PAD =480.47 LOT 15 FF = 481.50 PAD =480.67 LOT 16 FF = 481.90 PAD =481.07 LOT 17 FF = 481.70 PAD =480.87 LOT 18 FF = 480.50 PAD =479.67 LOT 24 FF = 477.00 PAD =476.17 LOT 23 FF = 477.40 PAD =476.57 LOT 22 FF = 477.90 PAD =477.07 LOT 21 FF = 478.40 PAD =477.57 LOT 20 FF = 479.00 PAD =478.17 LOT 19 FF = 479.10 PAD =478.27 LOT 25 FF = 478.80 PAD =477.97 LOT 26 FF = 478.20 PAD =477.37 LOT 27 FF = 477.40 PAD =476.57 LOT 28 FF = 477.00 PAD =476.17 LOT 29 FF = 473.70 PAD =472.87 LOT 30 FF = 473.40 PAD =472.57 LOT 31 FF = 473.20 PAD =472.37 LOT 33 FF = 472.40 PAD =471.57 LOT 34 FF = 471.80 PAD =470.97 LOT 50 FF = 472.50 PAD =471.67 LOT 49 FF = 472.00 PAD =471.17 LOT 48 FF = 471.40 PAD =470.57 LOT 36 FF = 471.50 PAD = 470.67 LOT 37 FF = 471.60 PAD =470.77 LOT 39 FF = 472.20 PAD = 471.37 LOT 40 FF = 472.30 PAD =471.47 LOT 38 FF = 471.90 PAD =471.07 LOT 41 FF = 471.30 PAD =470.47 LOT 42 FF = 472.10 PAD =471.27 LOT 43 FF = 472.50 PAD =471.67 LOT 44 FF = 472.20 PAD =471.37 LOT 45 FF = 471.90 PAD =471.07 LOT 46 FF = 471.60 PAD =470.77 LOT 47 FF = 471.60 PAD =470.77 LOT 32 LOT 35 476
475
480
476
480
479
478
478
479
480
480
480
479
479
479 478
477
475
478
479
476
477
476
476
475
476
475 476
475
474
475
476
477
478
479
479 478
479
479 478
477 477
470 471 469
468
467
467
467
468
466
465
470
469
469
468
468
470
473
470
469
470
471
472
474
473
475
471
470
471
469
470
468
469
470
470
471
473
474
468 467
466
469 SHEET PACE ENGINEERING REDDING, CALIFORNIA 05/20/21 REVISIONS NO DATE DESCRIPTION DR HORTON WYNDHAM POINTE SUBDIVISION HOUSE PAD OVERALL GRADING PLAN C1.0 2889.02 TJ/FL TJ ESTIMATED EARTHWORK QUANTITIES FOR BUILDING PADS 500 CY - CUT 19,000 CY - FILL 1"=50' SEE 1C1.1 SEE 1C1.2
THEA DRIVE
RAHNA STREET
PATSY DRIVE
GINNY COURT
LAGOON DRIVE
RIVERVIEW DRIVE
WYNDHAM LANE
COTTONWOOD IRRIGATION CANAL
5/20/21
Packet Pg. 742
Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for D
SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD WVWV
WV WV
WV
DY H WV
D
Y H WV
SD
SD
SD WV
WV
WV WV
WV
D
Y H WV LOT 6 FF = 481.30 PAD =480.47 W W E
W E W LOT 7 FF = 481.10 PAD =480.27 LOT 8 FF = 480.80 PAD =479.97 LOT 9 FF = 480.40 PAD =479.57 LOT 10 FF = 480.40 PAD =479.57 LOT 11 FF = 480.10 PAD =479.27 LOT 5 FF = 481.60 PAD =480.77 LOT 4 FF = 481.90 PAD = 481.07 LOT 3 FF = 482.00 PAD =481.20 LOT 2 FF = 481.50 PAD = 480.67 LOT 1 FF = 479.80 PAD = 478.97 LOT 12 FF = 480.70 PAD =479.87 LOT 13 FF = 481.00 PAD =480.17 LOT 14 FF = 481.30 PAD =480.47 LOT 15 FF = 481.50 PAD =480.67 LOT 16 FF = 481.90 PAD =481.07 LOT 17 FF = 481.70 PAD =480.87 LOT 18 FF = 480.50 PAD =479.67 LOT 24 FF = 477.00 PAD =476.17 LOT 23 FF = 477.40 PAD =476.57 LOT 22 FF = 477.90 PAD =477.07 LOT 21 FF = 478.40 PAD =477.57 LOT 20 FF = 479.00 PAD =478.17 LOT 19 FF = 479.10 PAD =478.27 LOT 25 FF = 478.80 PAD =477.97 LOT 26 FF = 478.20 PAD =477.37 LOT 27 FF = 477.40 PAD =476.57 LOT 28 FF = 477.00 PAD =476.17 LOT 29 FF = 473.70 PAD =472.87 LOT 30 FF = 473.40 PAD =472.57 LOT 31 FF = 473.20 PAD =472.37 LOT 33 FF = 472.40 PAD =471.57 LOT 50 FF = 472.50 PAD =471.67 LOT 32 476
475
480
476
480
479
478
478
479
480
480
480
479
479
479 478
477
475
478
479
476
477
476
476
475
476
475 476
475
474
475
476
477
478
479
479 478
479
479 478
477 477
470
471
472
474
473
475
471
470
469
470
471
473
474 469
471 472 EG 469.2± EG 469.8± EG 471.0± FG 471.7FG 471.7FG 471.7 FG 471.2 FG 471.2 FG 471.7 FG 471.6 FG 471.6 EG 469.0± EG 469.3± FG 471.6 FG 471.6 EG 469.6± FG 472.4 FG 472.4 FG 472.6 FG 472.6 FG 472.4 FG 472.6 FG 472.6 FG 472.9 FG 472.9 FG 472.9 EG 471.2± EG 470.2± EG 470.2± EG 469.9± EG 470.1± FG 476.2 FG 476.2 FG 476.6 FG 476.6 FG 476.2 EG 473.8± EG 473.4± EG 472.6± FG 476.2 FG 476.6 FG 477.4 EG 474.6± FG 476.6 FG 477.4 FG 477.4 FG 478.0 FG 478.0 FG 477.4 EG 475.1± EG 475.2± EG 475.6± FG 478.0 FG 478.0 FG 478.0 EG 475.5± FG 478.3 FG 478.3 FG 478.3 FG 478.2 FG 478.2 FG 478.2 FG 478.2 FG 478.3 EG 475.6± EG 475.4± EG 475.1± FG 477.6 FG 478.2 FG 477.6 FG 478.2 FG 477.6 FG 477.1 FG 477.6 FG 477.1 EG 474.8± FG 477.1 FG 476.6 EG 474.3± FG 477.1 FG 476.6 FG 476.2 FG 476.6 FG 476.6 FG 476.2EG 473.8± EG 473.5±EG 474.4± FG 476.2 FG 476.2 EG 475.9± FG 479.9 FG 479.9 EG 476.6± EG 477.1± FG 479.9 FG 480.2 FG 479.9 FG 480.2 FG 480.2 FG 480.5 FG 480.2 FG 480.5 EG 477.7± EG 477.3± EG 478.0± FG 480.5 FG 480.7FG 480.7 FG 480.5 FG 480.7 FG 481.1 FG 481.1 FG 480.7 EG 478.3± EG 478.1± EG 478.5± FG 480.9 FG 481.1 FG 481.1 FG 480.9 FG 480.9 FG 479.7 FG 479.7 FG 480.9 EG 477.8± EG 476.4± EG 475.9± FG 479.7FG 479.7 FG 479.0 EG 476.9± FG 479.0 EG 476.4± FG 479.0 FG 480.7 EG 477.6± FG 480.7 FG 479.0 FG 480.7 FG 481.2 FG 481.2 FG 480.7 FG 481.2 FG 481.1 FG 481.1 FG 481.2 EG 478.5± EG 478.3± FG 481.1 FG 480.8 FG 481.1 FG 480.8 FG 480.8 FG 480.5 FG 480.5 FG 480.8 EG 477.9±FG 480.5 FG 480.3 EG 477.7±FG 480.3 FG 480.0 EG 477.4± FG 480.0 FG 479.6 EG 477.1±FG 479.6 FG 479.6 EG 476.8±FG 479.6 EG 477.1± FG 479.6 FG 479.6 FG 479.6 FG 480.0 FG 479.6 FG 480.3 FG 480.0 FG 480.5 EG 477.1± FG 479.3FG 478.9 FG 479.3 EG 476.5±EG 476.8± FG 479.3 EG 475.8± EG 478.5± FG 472.9 EG 478.0± FG 480.3 EG 477.6± EG 477.2± EG 476.9± EG 476.9± SHEET PACE ENGINEERING REDDING, CALIFORNIA 05/20/21 REVISIONS NO DATE DESCRIPTION DR HORTON WYNDHAM POINTE SUBDIVISION HOUSE PAD GRADING PLAN - LOTS 1 THRU 28 C1.1 2889.02 TJ/FL TJ 1"=40'
1 1"=40' C1.1 ENLARGED GRADING PLAN C1.0
MATCHLINE SEE C1.2
THEA DRIVE
RAHNA STREET
PATSY DRIVE
WYNDHAM LANE
DRIVEWAY
10%(MAX) 5% PROPERTY LINE, TYP DRAINAGE SWALE FROM BACK TO FRONT, TYPICAL BOTH SIDES OF HOUSE. AVG 2% PER CITY OF REDDING STANDARDS. HOUSE +1.2' PAD +0.37 (10" BLDG STRUCTURAL SECTION) GARAGE +0.87' PATIO +0.87' HIGH POINT +0.0' (E) SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER STREET 1% 1 NTS TYPICAL FINAL LOT GRADING
10' +0.5' HINGE +0.62'±
5/20/21
Packet Pg. 743
Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for D
SD SD SD SD SD
WV
WVWV
D
Y H WV
D
Y H WV
D
Y H WV
SD SD
SD SD SD
SD
SD SD SD SD SD
SD SD SD SD
WV WV
WV WV
W E
E W W
W LOT 24 FF = 477.00 PAD =476.17 LOT 23 FF = 477.40 PAD =476.57 LOT 22 FF = 477.90 PAD =477.07 LOT 26 FF = 478.20 PAD =477.37 LOT 27 FF = 477.40 PAD =476.57 LOT 28 FF = 477.00 PAD =476.17 LOT 29 FF = 473.70 PAD =472.87 LOT 30 FF = 473.40 PAD =472.57 LOT 31 FF = 473.20 PAD =472.37 LOT 33 FF = 472.40 PAD =471.57 LOT 34 FF = 471.80 PAD =470.97 LOT 50 FF = 472.50 PAD =471.67 LOT 49 FF = 472.00 PAD =471.17 LOT 48 FF = 471.40 PAD =470.57 LOT 36 FF = 471.50 PAD = 470.67 LOT 37 FF = 471.60 PAD =470.77 LOT 39 FF = 472.20 PAD = 471.37 LOT 40 FF = 472.30 PAD =471.47 LOT 38 FF = 471.90 PAD =471.07 LOT 41 FF = 471.30 PAD =470.47 LOT 42 FF = 472.10 PAD =471.27 LOT 43 FF = 472.50 PAD =471.67 LOT 44 FF = 472.20 PAD =471.37 LOT 45 FF = 471.90 PAD =471.07 LOT 46 FF = 471.60 PAD =470.77 LOT 47 FF = 471.60 PAD =470.77 LOT 32 LOT 35 476
475
476
475 476
475
474
475
476
477
470 471 469
468
467
467
467
468
466
465
470
469
469
468
468
470
473
470
469
470
471
472
474
473
475
471
470
471
469
470
468
469
470
470
471
473
474
468 467
466
469
469
467
470 469
471 472
469
467
469
467 468
470 471
465 466
470
469
470
469
471 FG 471.3 FG 471.3 FG 471.3 FG 471.3 FG 471.7 FG 471.7 FG 471.3 FG 471.4 FG 471.7 FG 471.4 FG 471.1 FG 470.8 FG 470.8 FG 471.1 FG 471.4 FG 471.4 FG 471.7FG 471.7 EG 469.0± EG 469.0±EG 468.8± EG 468.5± EG 468.6± EG 468.4± FG 470.5 FG 470.5 FG 470.5 FG 470.5 FG 471.5 FG 471.5 FG 471.5 FG 471.4 FG 471.4 FG 471.5 FG 471.4 FG 471.1 FG 471.1 FG 471.4 FG 471.1 FG 470.8 FG 471.1 FG 470.8 FG 470.7 FG 470.7 FG 470.7 FG 470.7 FG 470.8 FG 470.8 FG 470.8 FG 470.8 FG 470.8 EG 469.3± EG 468.1± EG 468.1± EG 468.3± EG 468.7± EG 472.0± EG 471.7± EG 469.1± EG 467.9± EG 468.8± EG 468.1± EG 469.2± EG 469.8± EG 471.0± FG 471.7FG 471.7FG 471.7 FG 471.2 FG 471.2 FG 470.6 FG 470.6 FG 470.6 FG 470.6 FG 471.2 FG 471.2 FG 471.7 FG 471.0 FG 471.6 FG 471.0 FG 471.0 FG 471.6 FG 471.0 EG 468.7± EG 468.1± EG 469.0± EG 469.3± FG 471.6 FG 471.6 EG 469.6± FG 472.4 FG 472.4 FG 472.4 FG 472.6 FG 472.6 FG 472.4 FG 472.6 FG 472.6 FG 472.9 FG 472.9 FG 472.9 EG 471.2± EG 470.2± EG 470.2± EG 469.9± EG 470.1± FG 476.2 FG 476.2 FG 476.6 FG 476.6 FG 476.2 EG 473.8± EG 473.4± EG 472.6± FG 476.2 FG 476.6 FG 477.4 EG 474.6± FG 476.6 FG 477.4 FG 477.4 FG 478.0 FG 477.4 FG 477.1 EG 474.8± FG 477.1 FG 476.6 EG 474.3± FG 477.1 FG 476.6 FG 476.2 FG 476.6 FG 476.6 FG 476.2EG 473.8± EG 473.5±EG 474.4± FG 476.2 FG 476.2 FG 480.2 FG 480.5 FG 472.9 469 FG 470.8 EG 468.9± EG 468.8± EG 468.8± EG 468.3± EG 468.1± EG 468.0± EG 466.6±EG 465.7± SHEET PACE ENGINEERING REDDING, CALIFORNIA 05/20/21 REVISIONS NO DATE DESCRIPTION DR HORTON WYNDHAM POINTE SUBDIVISION HOUSE PAD GRADING PLAN - LOTS 29 THRU 50 C1.2 2889.02 TJ/FL TJ 1"=40'
1 1"=40' C1.2 ENLARGED GRADING PLAN C1.0
MATCHLINE SEE C1.1
RAHNA STREET
GINNY COURT
LAGOON DRIVE
DRIVEWAY
10%(MAX) 5% PROPERTY LINE, TYP DRAINAGE SWALE FROM BACK TO FRONT, TYPICAL BOTH SIDES OF HOUSE. AVG 2% PER CITY OF REDDING STANDARDS. HOUSE +1.2' PAD +0.37 (10" BLDG STRUCTURAL SECTION) GARAGE +0.87' PATIO +0.87' HIGH POINT +0.0' (E) SIDEWALK, CURB & GUTTER STREET 1% 1 NTS TYPICAL FINAL LOT GRADING
10' +0.5' HINGE +0.62'±
5/20/21
Packet Pg. 744
Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for
APPENDIX C
Marketing Material
Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) RIDGELINEBUILDERS.NET
In the interest of continuous improvement, Ridgeline Builders reserves the right to modify or change standard amenities, floorplans, architectual features, building materials, lot configuration, prices, terms and availability without notice or obligation. VTIW %HG'HQ%DWK
VTI W %HG%DWK
VTIW% H G % D W K
VTIW %HG%DWK
VTIW%HG%DWK
VTIW%HG%DWK
DRE 01860328
-HQQLIHU:DONHU (530) 604-2259
Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) RIDGELINEBUILDERS.NET
In the interest of continuous improvement, Ridgeline Builders reserves the right to modify or change standard amenities, floorplans, architectual features, building materials, lot configuration, prices, terms and availability without notice or obligation.
Amenities
MULTIPLE UPGRADE OPTIONS AVAILABLE!
BEAUTIFUL INTERIORS
• 9’ ceilings throughout
• Tray ceiling in great room
• Luxury vinyl plank floors in entry, halls, kitchen,
dining room, bathrooms, & laundry
• Carpet in bedrooms & great room
• Energy efficient LED recessed can lighting
• Upgraded 5.24” baseboards & 3.25” trim
• Ceiling fan in great room
• Bedrooms pre-wired for ceiling fans
• Modern & stylish interior door hardware
• Pre-wired TV outlet in great room & owner’s suite
• Coaxial cable in great room & bedrooms
• Fire sprinklers throughout
• Interconnected smoke alarms with battery backup
• Upgraded quiet exhaust fans
• Bullnose wall corners
STYLISH EXTERIORS
• Full front yard landscape with automatic sprinklers & weather sensor
• Modern exterior light fixtures
• Stucco exterior
• Dog-eared wood perimeter fencing with walk-through gate • Pre-wired for satellite
• Sectional roll-up garage door, auto opener, 2 remotes • Composition roofing with a limited lifetime warranty
• 200 amp main service panel
• Dedicated freezer receptacle in garage
• RV parking on select lots
• Greenbelt lots
• View lots
GREEN TECHNOLOGY
• Water conserving plumbing fixtures
• High performance dual-pain Low E glass windows
• Insulated air ducts
• Radiant barrier roof sheathing
• 2 coat exterior stucco system
• Up to R-60 ceiling insulation
• 2 x 6 construction
OWNER’S SUITE
• Tile shower with glass door
• Dual sink vanity
• Large walk-in closet
• Glass door to backyard
• Luxury vinyl plank floors in bathroom
GUEST BATH
• Tile surround tub/shower combination w/cast iron bathtub • Luxury vinyl plank floors
DESIGNER KITCHEN
• Quartz countertops with 4” quartz backsplash
• Upgraded stainless steel appliances
• Custom built cabinets with soft close feature
• Walk-in pantry with door
• Functional island
• Stainless steel under mount sink with disposal
LAUNDRY ROOM
• Indoor laundry room with energy efficient lighting
• 220 volt dryer outlet & gas stub
UTILITY PROVIDERS
• Spectrum - High Speed Internet
• PG&E - Electric & Gas
• City of Anderson - Water & Waste Management
Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) RIDGELINEBUILDERS.NET
In the interest of continuous improvement, Ridgeline Builders reserves the right to modify or change standard amenities, floorplans, architectual features, building materials, lot configuration, prices, terms and availability without notice or obligation.
Home Buyer’s Process
1. Meet with a Ridgeline Builders Representative
2. Get pre-approved for financing
3. Select lot & floor plan
4. Representative prepares the Purchase Agreement & related builder documents
5. $10,000 deposit is required with offer
6. Representative opens escrow with First American Title
7. Schedule Selections/Upgrade meeting with Ridgeline Builders Designer (no fee for this)
8. Buyer is responsible for paying out any additional elected upgrades at the time of selection/ upgrade meeting. These funds will be made payable to Ridgeline Builders and are nonrefundable and used to commence construction
9. Buyer to remove ALL buyer contingencies 10 days after acceptance of offer. Construction of the home will not begin until all contingencies are removed
10. Schedule Concrete/Landscape walk
11. Build time will be 120-180 days dependent on weather or any other unforeseen circumstances
12. Ridgeline Builders will set final completion date within 30 days of completion
13. Final walkthrough is scheduled 1 week prior to completion (seller to have 7 working days to complete any items found on the final walk through before closing escrow)
14. Buyer & Seller sign closing documents at First American Title
15. Close Escrow/Deliver Keys
Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
LOT MAP & PREMIUMS FOR
Pleasant Hills Phase 3
LOT 18 View LOT Plan TBD RV Parking Available
LOT 19 View LOT Plan 2103sf RV Parking Available
LOT 20 View LOT Plan TBD RV Parking Available
LOT 21 View LOT Plan TBD RV Parking Available
LOT 22 View LOT Plan TBD RV Parking Available
Available
Sold
Model
Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) BEDROOM 2
10'-6" x 10'-0" 9' CLG. CARPET
BEDROOM 3
10'-6" x 10'-4" 9' CLG. CARPET
PRIMARY BEDROOM
12'-9" x 13'-0" 9' FLAT CLG. CARPET
LIVING ROOM
15'-6" x 14'-0" 9' CLG. LVP
DINING
13'-2" x 8'-11" 9' CLG. LVP
2- CAR GARAGE
20'-4" x 23'-1" 9' CLG. CONCRETE PR BATH
9' CLG. LVP
KITCHEN
13'-2" x 10'-10" 9' CLG. LVP
PORCH
9' CLG
CONCRETE
PATIO
13'-5"x 8'-0" 9' CLG
CONCRETE
PANTRY
LAU
9' CLG. LVP WIC
9' CLG. CARPET
BATH 2
9' CLG. LVP
HALL
9' CLG. LVP
HALL
9' CLG. LVP
WOODSTOVE
FLOOR PLAN
1254 SF - 3 BED - 2 BATH - 2-CAR GARAGE
ELEVATION
THIS HOME DESIGN IS PROPERTY OF ADAMANT DESIGN AND RIDGELINE BUILDERS, REPRODUCTION OF THESE PLANS EITHER IN WHOLE OR PART, INCLUDING PREPARATION OF DERIVATIVE WORK IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. ACTUAL PLAN MAY VARY, BUILDER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MODIFY THE PLAN AT ANYTIME.
Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) BEDROOM 2
12'-6" x 10'-0" 9' CLG. CARPET
BEDROOM 3
12'-6" x 10'-4" 9' CLG. CARPET
PRIMARY BEDROOM
14'-9" x 14'-0" 9' FLAT CLG. CARPET
LIVING ROOM
16'-5" x 16'-0" 9' CLG. LVP
DINING
14'-2" x 9'-11" 9' CLG. LVP
2- CAR GARAGE
20'-3" x 23'-1" 9' CLG. CONCRETE PR BATH
9' CLG. LVP
KITCHEN
14'-2" x 10'-10" 9' CLG. LVP
PORCH
9' CLG
CONCRETE
PANTRY
LAU
9' CLG. LVP WIC
9' CLG. CARPET
BATH 2
9' CLG. LVP
HALL
9' CLG. LVP
HALL
9' CLG. LVP
PATIO
13'-5"x 8'-0" 9' CLG
CONCRETE
WOODSTOVE
FLOOR PLAN
1458 SF - 3 BED - 2 BATH - 2-CAR GARAGE
ELEVATION
THIS HOME DESIGN IS PROPERTY OF ADAMANT DESIGN AND RIDGELINE BUILDERS, REPRODUCTION OF THESE PLANS EITHER IN WHOLE OR PART, INCLUDING PREPARATION OF DERIVATIVE WORK IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. ACTUAL PLAN MAY VARY, BUILDER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MODIFY THE PLAN AT ANYTIME. Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) BEDROOM 3
11'-2" x 10'-9" 9' CLG. BEDROOM 2
9'-0" x 10'-7" 9' CLG.
MASTER BEDROOM
12'-6" x 14'-10" 9' FLAT CLG. HALL
9' CLG. DINING
10'-0" x 14'-3" 9' FLAT CLG. KITCHEN
9'-5" x 14'-0" 9' FLAT CLG. WIC
9' CLG. BATH 2
9' CLG. GREAT ROOM
15'-1" x 18'-5" 9' FLAT CLG. FOYER
9' FLAT CLG.
2 CAR GARAGE
22'-5" x 22'-5" 9' CLG.
COVERED PATIO
52'-0" x 10'-0" 9' CLG. M BATH
9' CLG.
LAU. 9' CLG. COV. ENTRY
9' CLG.
BEDROOM 4
9'-7" x 11'-7" 9' CLG.
WH
WOODSTOVE
1672 SF - 4 BED - 2 BATH - 2-CAR GARAGE
THIS HOME DESIGN IS PROPERTY OF ADAMANT DESIGN AND RIDGELINE BUILDERS, REPRODUCTION OF THESE PLANS EITHER IN WHOLE OR PART, INCLUDING PREPARATION OF DERIVATIVE WORK IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN PERMISSION. ACTUAL PLAN MAY VARY, BUILDER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MODIFY THE PLAN AT ANYTIME.
FLOOR PLAN
ELEVATION
Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) RIDGELINEBUILDERS.NET
In the interest of continuous improvement, Ridgeline Builders reserves the right to modify or change standard amenities, floorplans, architectual features, building materials, lot configuration, prices, terms and availability without notice or obligation. 1 sqft Bed 2 Bath
+$//
',1,1*
[
)/$7&/*
/,9,1*5220
[
75$<&/*
[
)/$7&/*
.,7&+(1
35,0$5<%('5220
[
&/*
35%$7+
&/*
%$7+
&/*
&/*
%('5220
[
&/*
%('5220
[
&/*
&29(175<
&/*
&21&5(7(
&$5*$5$*(
[
&/* &21&5(7(
/$8
&/*
+$//
&/*
)2<(5
&/*
Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) RIDGELINEBUILDERS.NET
In the interest of continuous improvement, Ridgeline Builders reserves the right to modify or change standard amenities, floorplans, architectual features, building materials, lot configuration, prices, terms and availability without notice or obligation. VTIW%HG%DWK
'
1 LAU.
9' CLG.
FOYER
9' CLG.
HALL
9' CLG.
BEDROOM 3
10'-11" x 12'-0"
9' CLG.
BEDROOM 4
10'-11" x 12'-0"
9' CLG.
PRIMARY BEDROOM
14'-11" x 15'-3"
10' TRAY CLG.
2- CAR GARAGE 23'-11" x 22'-0" 9' CLG.
ENTRY
9' CLG.
BEDROOM 2
10'-10" x 11'-0"
9' CLG.
KITCHEN
10'-11" x 15'-5"
9' FLAT CLG.
DINING
13'-1" x 11'-3"
9' FLAT CLG.
LIVING ROOM
19'-5" x 19'-7"
10' TRAY CLG.
BATH 2
9' CLG.
SOFFIT
COV. PORCH
12'-10" x 8'-4"
VAULTED CLG.
HALL
9' CLG.
COVERED PATIO
34'-3" x 14'-0"
9' CLG.
PRIMARY BATH
9' CLG.
Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) RIDGELINEBUILDERS.NET
In the interest of continuous improvement, Ridgeline Builders reserves the right to modify or change standard amenities, floorplans, architectual features, building materials, lot configuration, prices, terms and availability without notice or obligation.
VTIW%HG%DWK
'
1 Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
APPENDIX D
Example Certificates of Insurance
Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 757
Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER F :
INSURER E :
INSURER D :
INSURER C :
INSURER B :
INSURER A : NAIC #
NAME: CONTACT
(A/C, No): FAX
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
PRODUCER
(A/C, No, Ext): PHONE
INSURED
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.
If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
OTHER:
(Per accident)
(Ea accident)
$
$
N / A
SUBR WVDADDL
INSD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $
$
$
$ PROPERTY DAMAGE
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
AUTOS ONLY
AUTOS ONLY AUTOS NON-OWNED OWNED SCHEDULED
ANY AUTO
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
If yes, describe under
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
$
$
$ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEEE.L. EACH ACCIDENT EROTH- STATUTE PER
(MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EFFLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER INSR
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)
EXCESS LIAB
UMBRELLA LIAB EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $
$
OCCUR
CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ MED EXP (Any one person) $
EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LOC
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
CANCELLATION
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
HIRED
AUTOS ONLY
8/3/2022
AssuredPartners Design Professionals Insurance Services, LLC 3697 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Suite 230
Lafayette CA 94549
Nancy Ferrick 510-272-1400 [email protected] License#: 6003745 Sentinel Insurance Company 11000 PACEENGIN2 Twin City Fire Insurance Company 29459 PACE Engineering, Inc.
5155 Venture Parkway
Redding CA 96002
Arch Insurance Company 11150 1975492612
A X 1,000,000 X 1,000,000 10,000 1,000,000 2,000,000 X
Y Y 84SBWBF5258 8/3/2022 8/3/2023
2,000,000
A X X 10,000,000 Y Y 84SBWBF5258 8/3/2022 8/3/2023
10,000,000 X
10,000
B X
N
Y 84WEGAD6GVL 8/3/2022 8/3/2023
1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000
C Professional Liability PAAEP0143001 8/3/2022 8/3/2023 $2,000,000 $2,000,000
Per Claim
Annual Aggregate
This is an illustration of coverage for proposal purposes only. An actual certificate of insurance will be issued when contract is awarded. 30 Day Notice of Cancellation
***SAMPLE***
Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE
THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS.
INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE
INSURER F :
INSURER E :
INSURER D :
INSURER C :
INSURER B :
INSURER A : NAIC #
NAME: CONTACT
(A/C, No): FAX
E-MAIL ADDRESS:
PRODUCER
(A/C, No, Ext): PHONE
INSURED
COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: REVISION NUMBER:
IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed.
If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s).
THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS
CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER.
OTHER:
(Per accident)
(Ea accident)
$
$
N / A
SUBR WVDADDL
INSD
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS
CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $
$
$
$ PROPERTY DAMAGE
BODILY INJURY (Per accident)
BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT
AUTOS ONLY
AUTOS ONLY AUTOS NON-OWNED OWNED SCHEDULED
ANY AUTO
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY
Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION
AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED?
(Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below
If yes, describe under
ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE
$
$
$ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEEE.L. EACH ACCIDENT EROTH- STATUTE PER
(MM/DD/YYYY) LIMITS POLICY EXP(MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EFFLTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER INSR
DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required)
EXCESS LIAB
UMBRELLA LIAB EACH OCCURRENCE $ AGGREGATE $
$
OCCUR
CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $
PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ MED EXP (Any one person) $
EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED
PREMISES (Ea occurrence) $ COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LOC
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY)
CANCELLATION
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
ACORD 25 (2016/03)
© 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD
HIRED
AUTOS ONLY
8/8/2022
InterWest Insurance Services, LLC
License #0B01094
310 Hemsted Dr., Suite 200
Redding CA 96002-0935
Mindy Whitehouse 530-722-2602 530-722-3551 [email protected] License#: 0B01094 North American Capacity Ins Co 25038 PACEC-1 Wesco Insurance Company 25011 PACE Engineering, Inc.
1730 South Street
Redding CA 96001
1687509319
B 1,000,000 X
X X
WPP192243901 8/3/2022 8/3/2023
A Cyber Liability C4LQK067345CYBER2022 5/8/2022 5/8/2023 Limit of Liability $1,000,000
PROOF OF INSURANCE
CA Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: Ridgeline Builders Proposal - Copper Heights (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) November 21, 2023
VyuA__HAND-DELIVERY
City of Redding
City Clerk
777 Cypress Avenue, 3rd Floor
Redding, CA 96001
RE: _P_ROPOSAL FOR SCHEDULE NO. qu|_9
Development of Infrastructure that Supports a
Single-Family Housing Development
Purchasing Department:
Jaxon Enterprises ("Jaxon") is enthusiastic about the prospect of potentially collaborating wth the City of Redding ("City") to oreate an outstanding, affordable residential property. The opportunity to combine Jaxon's adjacent properties with the City's land presents the chance to masterplan a development that enhances both parcels. With years of experience developing properties in the Redding area, Jaxon sees this as a unique and somewhat challenging undertaking, partioulariy given the distinctive topography and location of the site.
Having previously worked on all phases of development from planning, construction, and marketing of residential properties, Jaxon brings valuable expertise to this venture. Those familiar with the Redding Showcase of Homes at Stan ford Hills may recall it as a notable Jaxon project. Additionally, Jaxon owns the adjacent property, Aline, currently in the design phase and slated for development in the near future. The combined development of these two properties holds the promise of creating something truly exceptional.
Jaxon has assembled a professional team including Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer and Nichols Melburg & Rossetto, both with decades of land development design experience to provide the creativfty necessary to provide a well thought out design for this project.
We have carefully reviewed the RFP and project site to develop a preliminary schematie plan and response to the RFP. We acknowledge receipt of Addendum No. 1 - Updated Tentative Time Schedule and Addendum No. 2 - Questions and Answers.
In closing, Jaxon wishes to thank you for the opportunfty to provide a response to the RFP. We look forward to working with Cfty staff to develop this property as a beneficial addition to our communfty. If selected, we will do our best to see that you are not disappointed.
Sincerely,
C}
W. Jaxo
•tquraulrfa% President
Jaxon Enterprises
WJB:kms
Enclosures
1643 TAHOE COURT
REDDING, CA
96003
Jaxon
_ - __ =
't ,* . _ ,
PH (530) 241-2112
FAX (530) 243-0787
P.0. BOX 994248
REDDING, CA
96099-4248
Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) 789
10 Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) JAXON ENTERPRISES – PROPOSAL FOR SCHEDULE NO. 5419
Project Approach and Understanding
Executive Summary
Our proposal comprehensively addresses the project's lifecycle, starting from its current conceptual stage through the design and processing of the tentative map, construction, and finalization of the infrastructure necessary for marketing a completed, buildable single-family lot. Should Jaxon be chosen as the City's developer, we are committed to contributing additional land from adjacent properties at no cost to the city, earmarked for road right-of-way, parks, and trails. Coordinated effectively, a master plan for the area could prove advantageous for both parties. If desired our team is prepared to move forward and undertake the construction of homes on the finalized lots as well.
It is common knowledge that the current state of the housing market in California has rendered home ownership unattainable for many families. Monthly principal and interest payments on home loans render ownership unaffordable for many working families. Our objective is to develop homes that cater to families with incomes below the local median, striving to offer residences that are compatible with existing developments in the project's vicinity while maintaining an affordable price point.
The Process
Jaxon Enterprises will function as the developer/contractor. The company holds both an A General Engineering and a B General Building contractors license. Jaxon envisions the process unfolding as follows:
Initially, Jaxon will present the City's representative with one or more tentative map lot layouts accompanied by corresponding construction cost estimates. Both City staff and the developer will engage in a collaborative review process, refining the layouts until a final tentative map arrangement is mutually agreed upon. This iterative approach will be replicated at various crucial decision points throughout the development process. Jaxon sees this project as akin to a design-build contract, drawing parallels with the approach currently employed by Caltrans in major infrastructure improvements. Success in this process hinges on close collaboration to address and resolve issues as they emerge.
Should the City appoint Jaxon as the developer an initial meeting will be convened to establish a tentative timeline featuring key milestones and associated to-do lists. Clear deliverables, along with their due dates, will be defined to ensure a structured and efficient progression of the project.
Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) JAXON ENTERPRISES – PROPOSAL FOR SCHEDULE NO. 5419
Examples of Deliverables/Milestones:
a. Generation of conceptual drawings for tentative maps and subsequent selection of a preferred layout.
b. Completion and submission of the tentative map to the planning department for processing and conditioning.
c. Obtaining environmental clearances for the proposed development. d. Acquisition of right-of-way for the project, if required. e. Development and finalization of construction drawings to facilitate the construction phase.
Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) JAXON ENTERPRISES – PROPOSAL FOR SCHEDULE NO. 5419
Responsible Personnel and
Team Experience with Similar Projects
Project Organization and Background
Jaxon has assembled the following team to design and oversee construction of the project:
Developer: Jaxon Enterprises
Jaxon Baker, Principal, Part-time
Leonard Bandell, General Counsel, Part-time
Mike Beursken, On-Site Construction Manager, Full-time Project Engineer: Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc., as Required Mike Dormer, Principal-in-Charge, Civil Design
Tim MacLean, ASLA, Project Manager, Planning
Ian Stripling, P.E., Project Manager, Civil
Architect: Nichols, Melburg & Rossetto, as Required
Les Melburg, Principal
Deven Carter, Associate Principal Architect
Developer Background
Jaxon Baker, the owner of Jaxon Enterprises, and one of four generations of Bakers living in Redding, has been a resident since 1950. He has witnessed its transformation from a small, rural town to a small city. Having grown up in a close-knit neighborhood in west Redding, Jaxon aims to recapture the sense of community in smaller town neighborhoods through this project. His education was through the Redding Elementary and Shasta Union High School Districts, and the University of Nevada with a Bachelor of Science degree in economics.
Jaxon Enterprises has successfully developed and sold several projects in and around Redding, including Land Park, Stanford Hills, River Ridge (portion), Oakmont 1 and 2, El Capitan, Quail Ridge, Montgomery Ranch, Monte de las Flores, Canto de las Lupine, a unit of Mountains Lakes Industrial Park, and the Homewood and Silvergate Subdivisions in Anderson. Some of these projects included building homes.
Other business ventures in the Redding area include establishing and operating Shasta Redi Mix and Aggregate Products on Clear Creek Road, as well as working as a general contractor specializing in construction, primarily paving, for Cities, Counties, and Caltrans.
Company overviews and resumes of key project team members of Jaxon Enterprises, Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer and Nichols Melburg & Rossetto are provided on the following pages.
Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
LEONARD BANDELL
General Counsel
Jaxon Enterprises and Related Companies
EDUCATION
• University of Pittsburgh, BA, 1972
• Golden Gate University, JD-MS (Tax), 1975
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
• Admitted to California Bar Association, 1975, California State Bar No. 65119 • Martindale-Hubbell 'A" Rated Since 1988
EXPERIENCE
The following is a partial reference to various projects which exposed me to issues that might assist should our proposal on RFP Schedule #5419 be accepted.
2006-Present – General Counsel
Jaxon Enterprises and related companies (e.g., Insignia Builders, Inc.). Residential Subdivision Projects include:
• Subdivision Map approval and buildout 110-lot Homewood Subdivision, Anderson • Subdivision Map approval and buildout 43-lot Fleur du Lac and 9-lot The Terrace • Subdivision Map approval, 156-lot Shasta Lake City map for Mt. Properties • Buildout only at Land Park project
• Land exchanges with U.S. Bureau of Land Management
1998-2006 – Disability forced retirement
1978-1998 – Private Practice, Redding
Emphasis on land use law, primarily commercial and residential developments. Representative samples of Redding projects include:
• An 80-acre commercial development at Dana Drive/Bradford Way • Residential representation of original owners of Country Heights and Signature Northwest • Mary Lake final phases
• Creation of Walmart site (required simultaneous closing amalgamation on 25 parcels from 18 owners)
1981-1998 – Partner
Reese, Bandell, Swanson & Jahr, and its successors
1978-1981 – Associate
Reese & Halkides
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
• City of Redding Community Services Advisory Commission, Member, 2003-2005 • Shasta County Tax Assessment Appeals Board, Past Legal Counsel
Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) MIKE BEUF]SKEN
530-51 0-8705
[email protected]
1157 Grand Avenue
Pledding, Ca 96003
Profile
After graduating high school in 1979 I immediately joined the Carpenters Apprenticeship Union Program. Throughout the program I worked for Don Tweedy Construction. It was there where I started the construction industry while building multistory hotels all over the West coast. In 1989 I earned my Contractors license and started Precision Builders. AI that point I started extensive remodels on Holidays Inns and continued those projects through 2018. During those years I also worked in the Bedding area completing a vast amount of commercial projects that included structural concrete, underground and demo work. I also worked with homeowners designing and building custom homes. I subcontracted with many contractors in the Bedding ariea on infrastructure project for a number of sub divisions. I worked with the City of Bedding and homeowners as a contractor for the Plus Program replacing sewer laterals and clean outs. I am currently still working on infrastructure projects in the Bedding and Anderson area.
Education
Central Valley High School Graduate 1979
Contractors License #559934 (A) (8)
Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) DESIGN
KNOWLEDGE
PARTNERSHIP
REPRESENTATION
320 HARTNELL AVE. • REDDING, CA • 96002 • 530.221.1792 • WWW.SDSENGINEERING.COM
SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER
About our Firm
Surveying
Land Planning Graphics
Civil Engineering
COMPANY
OVERVIEW
Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc. has been consulting Northern California property owners and developers since 1965. Our local knowledge, acquired through years of experience, has earned us excellent working relationships with regulatory agencies, contractors, and the north state business community.
We know the economic, environmental and regulatory challenges that impact projects in our state and the north state specifically. Time is money, and our diverse team of solution-oriented professionals use their technical expertise, local knowledge, and connections to provide sustainable cost effective design solutions.
The following is a list of the registered professionals currently associated with Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer:
Gregory Angus Dunbar Lic. # 56522 Civil Engineer
Ian Thomas Stripling Lic. # 70840 Civil Engineer
Joshua Rey Martin Lic. # 8184 Land Surveyor
Timothy Lee MacLean Lic. # 4461 Landscape Architect
Our skilled staff and state of the art
equipment produce surveys and maps
for projects of all sizes. Our expertise
includes: topographic and boundary
surveys; elevation certificates and flood
surveys; ALTA/ASCM land title surveys;
property line adjustments; parcel maps;
subdivision maps; easement preparation,
research, and analysis; and construction
staking to establish horizontal and
vertical control for construction projects.
An integral part of the team; our land planners specialize in preliminary concepts to finished designs for properties of all sizes; from single parcels to master planned communities. we take pride in producing sustainable and efficient designs that result in successful projects and satisfied clients.
From entitlements and permitting to
marketing and advertising; we offer a
wide variety of presentation graphics to
accurately and attractively convey your
vision.
Civil Engineering is the backbone of our operation. Our engineers find solutions to whatever engineering challenges your project may face. We specialize in: feasibility studies, Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessments, regulatory
permitting, grading and drainage design, hydrology, water and storm water design, roadway and utility design, retaining walls and sound walls, bid and construction administration, and SWPPPs. We have multiple QSD and QSP on staff who
provide cost effective BMP solutions, monitoring, inspection and reporting services, and turbidity and pH sampling to ensure construction general permit compliance.
Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Knowledge
Representation
Partnerships
Design
Achievements
WE GET PERMITS&MINIMIZE THE PROCESS
SHARRAH DUNLAP SAWYER
DESIGN
KNOWLEDGE PARTNERSHIP
REPRESENTATION
KNOWLEDGE
We’ve earned degrees from top institutions: U.C.
Berkeley, U.C. Santa Barbara, CSU Chico, San Jose
State, Arizona State University, and University of
Virginia, to name a few.
Our people have extensive national experience
ranging from the East Coast, Deep South, Chicago
& the Midwest to the Pacific Northwest, the Bay
Area, and Southern California.
Our employees have 249 years of combined
professional experience... just with SDS.
SDS has designed 10,000+ residential lots,
millions of square feet of commercial development,
& significant public facilities in the North State.
We do more than sit behind our desks; we are
active within the community & we know the North
State decision makers.
Chances are good we have a due diligence file
about the North State property you are researching.
REPRESENTATION
How can you tell an outgoing engineer from your
typical engineer? The outgoing engineer looks at
your shoes instead of his/her own shoes. We look
people in the eye.
We go to battle for our clients; we know local, state
and federal codes and how to use them to your
advantage.
Most of our clients are private sector companies or
people wanting to get something accomplished.
We strategize to streamline the process while focusing on our client’s goals.
We’re much more than your typical engineering
firm.
DESIGN
We create top-quality designs that are efficient to
construct, aesthetically pleasing, & sustainable.
On many occasions SDS has re-entitled projects prepared by others because our designs result in superior
developments.
We understand how to design your project to effectively utilize the land, avoid unneccessary permits, and get it built.
Our in-house professional land planners, engineers, &
landscape architects work together to create top quality designs while our graphic artists present the designs in a way everyone can understand.
PARTNERSHIPS
When you hire SDS, we become your teammate.
We are commited to see you succeed.
We are team oriented and value collaborations.
We are proud to list one of the largest private land
owners, two of the largest real estate firms, and two of the largest home builders in the U.S. as on-going clients of ours.
ACHIEVEMENTS
We received a CE News national award and have earned
local & regional design awards throughout the years.
We get permits which allow our clients to build the
projects we’ve designed for them; this results in many
repeat clients committed to SDS.
The ultimate achievement in our 57 years of business is not a plaque on our wall, but a successful project; as
measured by our client, the community, and the test of
time.
We have more North State projects built than any other
design firm.
CIVIL ENGINEERS LAND PLANNERS SURVEYORS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS GRAPHIC DESIGNERS 320 HARTNELL AVE • REDDING, CA • 96002 • 530.221.1792 • WWW.SDSENGINEERING.COM
Packet Pg768 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
MIKE DORMER
Project Manager
Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc.
EDUCATION
• Chabot College, Hayward, Science and Mathematics Division, Associate of Science in Civil Engineering, 1981
• University of California, Berkeley, College of Engineering, Engineering Courses, 1982
EXPERIENCE
Mike Dormer has served as a project manager for Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc. since 1989. With over 41 years of experience in the disciplines of planning, design and surveying in the field of civil engineering, his work has included the planning and design of schools, residential subdivisions, parks, commercial and industrial projects and various public facilities from the South San Francisco Bay Area to the Northern California border. Mike is also experienced in the preparation and processing of assessment districts, including the creation and presentation of engineer’s reports and assessment diagrams.
During his tenure with SDS, Mike has served as the project manager and designer of more than 60 residential projects in Northern California consisting of more than 3,500 single family lots and 800 multiple family units. Mike has also designed numerous large industrial and commercial projects in the Redding area. Prior to joining SDS, Mike worked for Bissell and Karn in Pleasanton, California where he was heavily involved in the design and development of the Hacienda Business Park. Mike’s involvement with his projects begins during the entitlement process with preliminary grading, utility and infrastructure design and continues through the preparation of construction documents and oversight during the construction process. He is skilled at managing each project to meet client expectations while remaining sensitive to political, financial and environmental considerations.
As a principal of the SDS organization, Mike serves as a coach and mentor for the junior members of the engineering and environmental design team. He challenges them to continue developing their skills while also demonstrating their commitment to provide excellent client service.
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
• City of Redding Board of Appeals
• City of Redding Small-Lot Residential Development Guidelines Committee • City of Redding Tree Ordinance Committee
• City of Redding Interview Panels for various positions in the public works department • Facilities Development Committee – Neighborhood Church of Redding Board • Redding Community Creek Clean Up Program
• Junior High and High School Basketball Coach – Redding Christian School • Various youth sports coaching positions
CONTINUING EDUCATION
• Administration and Enforcement of Wetlands and Endangered Species Regulations • DAR Open Channel and Pressure Flow Hydraulics
• National Flood Insurance Program Seminar
• Leadership Development and Team Building
• PSMJ Project Management Bootcamp
• PSMJ Principals Bootcamp
Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
TIM MACLEAN, ASLA
Principal
Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc.
EDUCATION
• University of Virginia, School of Architecture, Master of Landscape Architecture, 1993 • University of California, Berkeley, College of Environmental Design, Bachelor of Arts in Landscape Architecture with Honors, 1991
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
• Licensed Landscape Architect No. 4461, California Board of Architectural Examiners • American Society of Landscape Architects, Full Member No. 738360
EXPERIENCE
Tim MacLean has earned a reputation for excellence during his 30 years of professional experience specializing in the analysis, planning and design of built and natural places. Tim successfully manages projects through the complex regulatory process in conjunction with other professionals to produce high quality, aesthetically pleasing, economically sound, and environmentally sensitive results.
Prior to his involvement with SDS, Tim designed projects in the San Francisco Bay Area, Virginia, Philadelphia and Chicago. While in Chicago, Tim’s client list included: D.R. Horton, Knauz Auto Group, Trammell Crow Company, H. Wayne Huizenga, Brookfield Zoo, Cook County Forest Preserve, Glen Ellyn Park District and the communities of Fox River Grove, Gurnee, Round Lake, Hawthorne Woods and Olympia Fields.
For the last 24 years Tim has focused his efforts in Northern California. He successfully manages many of Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer’s largest projects through the entitlement process, including Mountain Gate at Shasta Master Planned Community, Highland Park, Salt Creek Heights, and Shastina Ranch Planned Development. In addition, Tim continues to provide design input and technical oversight for site design jobs of all types and sizes, from residential subdivisions and planned developments to commercial projects and mixed-use master plans.
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
• Shasta County Planning Commissioner, 2015-present
• Chairman of the Shasta County Planning Commission, 2018, 2022 • City of Redding Small-Lot Residential Development Guidelines Committee • City of Redding General Plan Update Committee Member, 2007, 2022 • Greater Redding Chamber of Commerce – Redding Zoning Ordinance Review Committee • Viva Downtown Redding Design Committee Member
• City of Redding Architectural Review Committee Member for the Airport Industrial Park • City of Redding Technology Committee Member, 1999
• City of Redding Planning Department Interview Panel Member, 2006 • Volunteer Art Teacher at Grant School and Manzanita School • Friends of Whiskeytown, Inc. Board Member, 2009-2013
CONTINUING EDUCATION
• Administration and Enforcement of Wetlands and Endangered Species Regulations • Clean Water Act Section 404: Nationwide and Other Specialized Permits • Erosion Control and Land Restoration
• Legally Defensible Environmental Review Under CEQA in California • Subdivision Map Act Workshop
• PSMJ Project Management Bootcamp & Principals Bootcamp
Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
IAN STRIPLING
Civil Engineer
Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc.
EDUCATION
• California State University, San Jose, College of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, 2003
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
• Professional Civil Engineer No. 70840, California Board for Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors • California Stormwater Quality Association Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) and Qualified SWPPP Practitioner (QSP) No. 00189
EXPERIENCE
Ian Stripling is a skilled and talented civil engineer, designer and project manager. His land development experience includes road design and the design of grading, drainage, pavement, water supply, waste water collection and storm drainage systems for projects ranging from small commercial developments to large residential subdivisions.
Ian has over 20 years of experience in storm drain design, hydrology, hydraulics, post-construction storm water mitigation plans and storm water pollution prevention plans. He regularly participates in continuing education seminars and peer focus groups to keep current on frequently changing regulations impacting storm water management. He has developed excellent working relationships with key personnel at governmental agencies responsible for water quality management.
Today, Ian works collaboratively with professionals from various engineering disciplines that comprise the Sharrah Dunlap Sawyer, Inc. Land Development Team to ensure that clients are provided with timely and accurate service that remains responsive to the unique requirements of construction projects.
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
• Redding Rotary, Community Service Committee Co-Chair
• East Redding Little League Coach
• Leadership Redding Class of 2008/2009
• Active 20/30 Club (President, Vice-President, Board Member) • American Public Works Association Member
• Alta Mesa, Sunset and Kids Kingdom and One Safe Place Playground Community Construction Projects • Redding 20 Under 40 Class of 2014
CONTINUING EDUCATION
• New General Construction Storm Water Permit Update Seminar • Statewide Construction General Permit Overview Workshop • Design and Installation of Buried Pipes Seminar
• Administration and Enforcement of Wetlands and Endangered Species Regulations Seminar • DAR Engineering, Hydraulic Engineering Training Program • Erosion and Sediment Control Workshop
• Shasta College Leadership and Management Development Series • Leadership Development and Team Building
• Statewide Industrial Permit Overview Workshop
Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) NICHOLS, MELBURG & ROSSETTO ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS
Nichols, Melburg & Rossetto was founded in 1967
our long-standing success reflects an established
organization staffed with experienced and talented
architects, interior designers, and structural engineers dedicated to their professions. Much of our staff have
developed long standing working relationships with
members of the building industry in Northern California through years of continual collaboration and a long
established client base, including the City of Redding.
This collaboration takes place not only between NMR
and our clients, but also developed over years of
working together with the subconsultants.
Being a local firm, NMR’s Redding office will provide expeditious project coordination arrangements and handson services during construction. We can have “boots on the ground” quickly to assist our clients. NMR is part of the community in the North State and we will have local accountability to make sure that this project is successful. Under the leadership of the founding partners, our guiding principle has been, and will continue to be, producing architectural solutions that meet the functional, aesthetic and technical needs of our clients.
The most successful projects have always emphasized the role of the stakeholders as an active member of the design team. The stakeholders participation is extremely important in our design process because it brings the expertise and in-depth knowledge of the user group’s operational philosophy, culture, and management attitudes.
It will be our responsibility to convey a concise design directive to the community and assist in any necessary forums and presentations to the stakeholders.
In addition to our relationship working with the City of Redding, we have successfully worked with public development agencies within the community. We have experience designing projects that have public/private partnerships.
NMR has cultivated experience and developed expertise in our staff for over 55 years that allows us to provide our clients with a range of services to meet their specific needs. Our design professionals excel in conceptual design, preparation of coordinated construction documents, effective construction administration, and sound project management.
REDDING
300 Knollcrest Drive
Redding, CA 96002
(530) 222-3300
[email protected]
NICHOLS, MELBURG & ROSSETTO
ARCHITECTS & ENGINEERS
CHICO
555 Main Street, Suite 300
Chico, CA 95928
(530) 891-1710
[email protected]
MONTEREY
769 Pacific Street
Monterey, CA 93940
(530) 222-3300
SANTA ROSA
2455 Bennett Valley Rd,
Suite B303
Santa Rosa, CA 95404
(707) 536-2121
Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) NICHOLS, MELBURG & ROSSETTO ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS
RENDERINGS AND COMPUTER MODELING
The dramatic gains in technology today have greatly increased our ability to use 3D computer modeling, rendering and animation to provide virtual images of a completed structure prior to actual construction. Renderings and animations have all but replaced construction of physical models as a way to communicate project alternatives.
NMR has a dedicated Visualization Studio that allows us to explore and master the latest digital technologies.
Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) NICHOLS, MELBURG & ROSSETTO ARCHITECTS + ENGINEERS
Deven’s well-rounded design ability and production skills have contributed to the successful and timely completion of projects for a wide variety of Governmental Agencies and Residential Developments. Deven’s approach is always to work closely and collaboratively with his clients, in a shared effort to produce projects that are functional and attractive.
RELEVANT PROJECT EXPERIENCE
Veterans Housing Development | Shasta Lake, CA
Rava Ranches Workforce Housing | King City, CA
Mercy Oaks Senior Housing | Redding, CA
Stanford Estates Residence| Redding, CA
Willits CCC Residential Center | Ukiah, CA
Butte Fire Center Residential Housing | Magalia, CA
Auberry CCC Residential Center | Auberry, CA
Palo Cedro Community Park | Palo Cedro, CA
Burney Commons Community Housing Development | Burney, CA Alturas Crossing Community Housing Development | Redding, CA B20 Community Housing Development | Chico, CA
Cascade Village Housing Development | Shasta Lake, CA
John Beaudet Community Center Remodel | Shasta Lake
City Hall Masterplan | Shasta Lake, CA
Community Center | Shasta Lake, CA
Redding School of the Arts High School | Redding, CA
Cornerstone Community Bank | Redding, CA
Junction Elementary Recreation Center Master Plan | Palo Cedro, CA Strong Family Medical Clinic, Youth & Fitness Center | Alturas, CA California Soccer Park Exterior Improvements | Redding, CA
INDUSTRY EXPERIENCE
20 Industry Years
NMR Team Member Since 2004
PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATION
Licensed Architect, CA,
No. C34730
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture,
Woodbury University, San Diego, CA
2004
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Redding Youth Soccer League
Rotary Youth Services
Connection Church Children’s Programs
PACE Academy, Volunteer
Redding East Rotary, Member
Redding Soccer Park, Volunteer
CONTACT INFORMATION
Nichols, Melburg and Rossetto
300 Knollcrest Drive
Redding, CA 96002
(530) 222-3300
[email protected]
DEVEN CARTER
ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL ARCHITECT
NICHOLS, MELBURG & ROSSETTO
Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) JAXON ENTERPRISES – PROPOSAL FOR SCHEDULE NO. 5419
Project Design, Planning Construction
Documents and Oversight
The project design oversight will be the responsibility of Mike Dormer, PrincipalIn-Charge. Tim MacLean and his staff will take the lead in the early stages of the project including preparation of conceptual layouts, cooperation with City staff, preparation of the tentative map and assisting the City during tentative map processing.
Ian Stripling and his staff will take the lead on the preparation and preparation of construction documents through the City of Redding for approval. This project will receive the highest priority and very experienced SDS management staff will be involved in this project on a daily basis to achieve the project goals.
The following pages reflect the initial concept scheme for the property, taking into consideration existing easements, steep slope and existing utilities. This plan also anticipates the use of the Baker property for a regional park, trails system, road connections and storm water management.
The subsequent pages identify the residential subdivisions SDS has worked on over the past 10 years in the Shasta County area.
Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) RRA
Subdivision
Infrastructure
DevelopmentProject
Quartz Hill Road
Keswick Dam Road
Buenaventura Boulevard
Sutro Mine Road
Park
Detention
Neighborhood Lot Range
A 34 - 41
B 14 - 17
C 8 - 10
D 26 - 32
E 17 - 22
F 29 - 36
G 24 - 31
Total 152 - 189
A
E
D
B
G
F
To the
River Trail
Project Boundary
The design consists of 7 neighborhoods linked
via a trail system and road network connecting
to the north, east, south and west to maximize
access to and from the project and surrounding neighborhoods.
The on-site count ranges from 152 to 189
single-family lots.
The 152 lot count utilizes a 75’ minimum lot
width and 8,000 square foot minimum lot size
per RS-2.5 standards.
The 189 lot scheme utilizes 6o’ wide lots.
A large park is situated on the parcel immediately south of the project site to maximize the on-site unit count.
The project detention is also located south of
the project site to further increase the efficiency of the on-site development The trail network will provide links from this
project and the surrounding neighborhoods to
both the new park and the River Trail.
The trails can also serve as additional emergency access routes.
The final lot count and configuration will be
dependent upon the results of the environmental
studies.
Future
Expansion
Area
Trail
S H A R R A H
D U N L A P
SAWYER
INCORPORATED
C
RRA
ALIZE
Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) RRA
Subdivision
Infrastructure
DevelopmentProject
Quartz Hill Road
Keswick Dam Road
Buenaventura Boulevard
Sutro Mine Road
Park
Detention
Neighborhood Lot Range
A 34 - 41
B 14 - 17
C 8 - 10
D 26 - 32
E 17 - 22
F 29 - 36
G 24 - 31
Total 152 - 189
A
E
D
B
G
F
To the
River Trail
Project Boundary
The design consists of 7 neighborhoods linked
via a trail system and road network connecting
to the north, east, south and west to maximize
access to and from the project and surrounding neighborhoods.
The on-site count ranges from 152 to 189
single-family lots.
The 152 lot count utilizes a 75’ minimum lot
width and 8,000 square foot minimum lot size
per RS-2.5 standards.
The 189 lot scheme utilizes 6o’ wide lots.
A large park is situated on the parcel immediately south of the project site to maximize the on-site unit count.
The project detention is also located south of
the project site to further increase the efficiency of the on-site development The trail network will provide links from this
project and the surrounding neighborhoods to
both the new park and the River Trail.
The trails can also serve as additional emergency access routes.
The final lot count and configuration will be
dependent upon the results of the environmental
studies.
Future
Expansion
Area
Trail
S H A R R A H
D U N L A P
SAWYER
INCORPORATED
C
RRA
ALIZE
Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
ALIZE, LLC
115-180-028 243.91 Ac.
REDDING
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
115-170-001
113.89 Ac.
USA
115-180-001
237.88 Ac.
USA
115-180-006
149.50 Ac.
STANFORD HILLS
LAND PARK
RIVER RIDGE
N
Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule
Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) JAXON ENTERPRISES – PROPOSAL FOR SCHEDULE NO. 5419
Budget and Cost Estimates
Budget
Jaxon is providing a rough estimate of the project's anticipated cost, acknowledging the current uncertainties.
Preparation of the proposal, including a conceptual lot layout, is at the proposer's expense.
The tentative map drafting, environmental work, and other required studies will be carried out concurrently. We understand that environmental studies have been commissioned by the city. Those costs could be folded back into our contract with the City if desired. We do not have an estimate for this phase as we do not know what has been agreed to between City and the consultants presently doing the various studies.
Lacking a complete set of plans, an estimate for construction, based on the adjacent Alize development, is proposed. Historically estimated at $55,000 per lot, the current projection, factoring in inflation and prevailing wages, is approximately $80,000 to $105,000 per lot, including City plan check costs, inspection fees, and an onsite construction manager.
Jaxon envisions a four or five-acre park adjacent to the project costing perhaps two million dollars. Other exceptional costs that may be incurred are those associated with any right-of-way acquisition required, bike trails, parking lot.
Budget Summary
i. Property -0-
ii. Planning Tentative Map $ 100,000
iii. Construction cost 125 lots $12,500,000
iv. Engineering through final map $ 1,250,000
v. Overhead $ 1,500,000
vi. Park, Trails, Parking Lot $ 2,000,000
Total $17,350,000
Basis for cost estimate
The above budget estimate is based upon our assumptions, among other things, for locations of utilities that can be tapped into. For example, water we assume is available from the water main running down Buenaventura. An easement will be required to cross USA, which should not be difficult to obtain. We believe the access road going to Quartz Hill Road should be able to be placed on WAPA powerlines easement. Sewer connection can be made on the sewer traversing the Alize property to the south. Property required for the park and bike trail will be granted to the city at no charge by the developer.
Electrical is City of Redding and appears to be available on site. With California’s new law regarding residential use of natural gas, we are uncertain that it will be needed. We assume that the project will be allowed to proceed with a negative or mitigated negative declaration, but that remains uncertain at this time. Therefore, while we think our cost estimate is realistic and erroring on the conservative side, there remain several significant questions to be answered.
Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) JAXON ENTERPRISES – PROPOSAL FOR SCHEDULE NO. 5419
Financial Viability of Developer
A letter of credit from a bank acceptable to the city will be provided to ensure the developer's capacity to fund the undertaking.
Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) JAXON ENTERPRISES – PROPOSAL FOR SCHEDULE NO. 5419
Subdivision and Buildout
Building homes onsite with prevailing wages requires further investigation due to the unique circumstances. Jaxon, having built numerous homes in the Redding and Anderson area, will explore the most efficient way to navigate this construction process.
Options might include building portions of the home offsite.
Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) JAXON ENTERPRISES – PROPOSAL FOR SCHEDULE NO. 5419
Unique Additions Providing Additional Benefit to the City The proposed subdivision is located immediately north of the property owned by Jaxon, known as the Alize Subdivision. This proposal includes unique additions to the project, including the following:
Providing additional land at no cost to the city for a regional public park allowing the subject property to maximize the lot count. Providing additional land at no cost to the city for bike/walking trail purposes over the developer's adjacent property.
Providing additional land at no cost to the city for a storm water detention facility that will serve both the City project and the Alize Subdivision allowing the subject property to maximize the lot count.
Provide additional vehicular connection points to the south in this highly sensitive fire zone.
The developer will reach out to land located between the subject property and Buenaventura Blvd currently owned by BLM to determine if that land could be purchased to expand the proposed project west.
The design will encompass a combined project with the adjacent Alize Project. The result will be a development that better utilizes the combined properties as compared to each being designed independently. The Alize Project will trail the City’s project for buildout.
The developer will contribute both land and easements for a park and trail system for walking and bikes. The added trail will connect with and enhance the city’s current trail system. It should have the added benefit of getting bikers off Buenaventura Boulevard.
Jaxon believes enough in Redding’s trail system, that we built the bike trail from Sutro Mine Road and dedicated it to the city at no cost to the city. This trail is a mile in length and costs $500,000. While it complements both Stanford Hills and Land Park, two Jaxon developments, it was not a tentative map requirement. I am happy to say that it is extensively used by both residents of the neighborhoods and many other City of Redding residents as well. Additionally, a bike trail could be constructed to the Lake Redding subdivision running down the existing sewer easement which runs from Keswick Dam Road to Harlan Drive. The sewer maintenance road could be improved to accommodate bikes.
Developments that would benefit from a park in this area include River Ridge, Keswick Dam Estates, Land Park, and Stanford Hills. Close to a thousand homes with no local park to serve their needs. You may notice an allowance of two million dollars for a park and trail system. The actual number of dollars needed to create these features will need to be determined after developing a plan of what is desired.
Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: Jaxon Enterprises Proposal - RRA Subdivision (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) 850 Quartz Hill Road
Infrastructure Development
Proposal for the Design, Right of Way Acquisition, Compliance, Project Management, & Construction of
in support of a future single-family housing development.
City of Redding | Housing Department
APN 1151700010000 | RFP Schedule #5419
NovemPacket Pg. 792 ber 22, 2023Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Contents
A. Cover/Transmittal Letter
B. Project Approach & Understanding
01 Project Overview
02 Developer Approach
03 Scope of Work
04 Project Insights
a. Key Issues
b. Additions
a1. Expanded Property Acquisitions
a2. Strategic Financial Leverage
a3. Collaborating with Neighboring Properties
& Developments
a4. Creating a Trail & Recreation Destination
05 Project Concepts
C. Personnel, Experience, Funding & Schedule
01 Developer Information
02 Organizational Charts
03 Responsible Personnel
04 Developer Experience
05 Planning & Control
06 Schedule
D. Financial Viability
01 Construction Budget
02 Status and Financial History
E. Subdivision Acquisition & Build Out
01 Innovative Design Philosophy
02 Community Integration
03 Home Construction
04 Budget
05 Strategic Marketing & Sales Plan
06 Workforce Housing Buyer Finance
07 Sustainability Initiatives
F. Unique Additions & Benefits
01 Points of Interest
02 Connectivity
03 Pedestrian Scale Amenities
04 A Vibrant Neighborhood
EXHIBITS
Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) City of Redding: Housing Division
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001
Hand Delivered
November 22, 2023
Re: Proposal for the Design, Right of Way Acquisition, Compliance, Project Management, & Construction of 850 Quartz Hill Road Subdivision Infrastructure Development APN 1151700010000 | RFP Schedule #5419
Dear City of Redding Procurement Team:
Congratulations on the award and receipt of CDBG Disaster Relief Infrastructure funds for this exciting infrastructure project. K2 Development Company, Inc. (hereto referred to as K2 Development) is pleased to submit the following proposal in response to the RFP for the infrastructure development of approximately 112 acres located at 850 Quartz Hill Road.
K2 Development is a local developer deeply committed to the well-being of our city. We are excited for the opportunity to transform a 112-acre parcel of land into a beacon of hope and resilience in the aftermath of the Carr Fire and we aim to present a robust proposal that addresses the unique challenges faced by our community therewith. As the Executive Officer of K2 Development Company, I am confident in our ability to bring a successful and innovative vision to this project.
Enclosed you will find the following requested information in accordance with the required proposal contents:
I acknowledge receipt of Addenda No. 1 and 2 and have verified the information on the City's official website:
https://www.cityofredding.gov/_T65_R54.php.
K2 Development Company has a proven track record of delivering successful and award-winning projects and a history of meaningful partnerships with the City of Redding that have impacted our community for the better.
Our team, combined with the vast experience of our consultants and subconsultants, has the experience and expertise necessary to deliver on every aspect of this project.
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me at [email protected]. We are eager to contribute to the success of this transformative subdivision and look forward to the opportunity to further discuss our proposal.
Regards,
Daniel Knott, Executive Officer
K2 Development Companies
Cover/Transmittal Letter
A.
| Cover/Transmittal Letter
| Project Approach & Understanding
| Responsible Personnel Team Experience, & Funding
| Financial Viability of Developer
| Subdivision Acquisition & Build Out
| Unique Additions Providing Additional Benefit
SECTION A
SECTION B
SECTION C
SECTION D
SECTION E
SECTION F
Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) B Project Approach & Understanding
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Project Approach & Understanding
B.1 | PROJECT OVERVIEW
K2 Development has assembled a talented
and experienced team that will deliver a
unique residential development that honors
the property’s natural terrain while
incorporating the property’s power line
easements and water shed area constraints
as park and walking trails. We intend to
design a multi modal cul-de-sac based
neighborhood that will provide a trail system
in open spaces, allowing for the separation of
vehicle and pedestrian/bike experiences. This
trail system, along with the subdivision
layout, will promote a sense of community as
neighbors spend time together without
being concerned about traffic. In the home
construction phase of the project, K2 will
implement home designs and compact
neighborhood areas that will further promote
this sense of community.
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 5 Our proposal will rely heavily on K2
Developments’ experience in delivering
Public/Private partnership projects on time
and on budget. GHD is a multinational
planning, environmental, and engineering
firm that is capable of producing any
deliverables necessary to shepherd this
project through finished lots in the short
timeline designated for this project.
While we cannot control environmental and
agency requirement timelines, we have
assembled a team that has the experience
and knowledge to move the design process
along as quickly as possible. We are confident
that through our partnership with the City
we will deliver finished lots by December 1,
2025. Our team is excited for this challenge
and looks forward to producing an innovated
subdivision that we all can be proud of.
Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Identifying constraints and opportunities
Verifying that roads, trails, parks, homes and amenities can be provided in the constrained environment.
Verifying that there is a design and a path forward that will meet the requirement of providing finished lots by
December 1, 2025.
Demonstrating that the entire K2 team will execute on the opportunity as well and the creative work that will be
required to achieve success. Which is of course, our only option.
K2 Development and the City of Redding envision a finished neighborhood that provides a one-of-a-kind experience in Redding. The preliminary design information in this proposal is for the purpose of:
We would like to emphasize to the City that the preliminary designs are conceptual and we are confident that the highest-quality, creative solutions will emerge throughout the collaboration and discovery process.
The conceptual design includes the following elements:
A fully functional subdivision (that may
provide over 180 homes) can fit the terrain and
easement constraints.
A path forward to final map recordation that
can avoid impacts to waters of the US.
Water, sewer, storm drainage, MS4
treatment, storm water detention and dry
utilities can be designed and constructed
with traditional means. *Note- we do expect
that there may be some horizontal boring
under wetlands to meet the schedule.
A trail system like no other trail system in
Redding. Every sub-neighborhood, every
terrain peak, every open space, and all
adjoining land will be connected with a
combination of concrete, paved and
Project Approach & Understanding
B.2 | DEVELOPER APPROACH
Preliminary Project Design and Visioning
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 6 Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Project Approach & Understanding
B.2 | DEVELOPER APPROACH
Preliminary Project Design and Visioning
aggregate (e.g., decomposed granite). Nearly
all trails will be less than 5% in grade with the
opportunity to sit on benches and enjoy the
vistas along the way. We’ve also identified the
ability to provide numerous looping trails to
best serve a wide range of trail users. We
envision the trail system, park, open space, etc.,
to be a unique combination of what the City
has provided at Clover Creek Preserve and the
McConnell Foundation has provided along
Shasta View Drive, with more hills due to the
terrain. We anticipate that the trails and
amenities will be constructed, under
agreement with the City, during the home
building phase.
The highest quality land set aside for a new
neighborhood park. While the City has park
land available within the River Ridge Terrace
subdivision, this new project will provide the
unique ability to provide connectivity and
create different experiences within the sites.
The area set aside within this project will be
larger and flatter, making it easier to
implement the kind of facility that best meets
current needs. Our goal is to identify a strategy
with the City of Redding that results in the
construction of the new park very early in the
home building phase!
Trailheads with small vehicular, bike and
scooter parking at several locations
throughout the development. Our goal is to
provide easy access to trailheads for both
visitors and residents.
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 7 Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) The potential to create a Neighborhood
Electric Vehicle (NEV) program that allows
persons with physical limitations to enjoy the
trails and parks. A 40-50 unit attached singlefamily neighborhood along the highest ridgeline that will have spectacular mountain
views and contiguous access to the open
space under one of the electric transmission
lines. We see this as an amazing opportunity to
create something affordable while providing
the highest quality living amenities. We invite
the City to envision something that blends the
best of Alturas Crossing Apartments with the
views of City Lights Apartments.
Traditional single-family homes with the
potential to create sub-neighborhoods with
attached single-family homes, zero-lot-line
homes or clusters of homes with a small
common green space. Again, the conceptual
design is for the purpose of verifying grading
and constraints. Actual lot design and
product mix will be established within the
first two months of work and in
collaboration with City staff.
Project Approach & Understanding
B.2 | DEVELOPER APPROACH
Preliminary Project Design and Visioning
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 8 Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Project Approach & Understanding
B.3 | SCOPE OF WORK: Phase 1
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 9 Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Project Approach & Understanding
B.3 | SCOPE OF WORK: Phase 2
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 10 Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Project Approach & Understanding
B.3 | SCOPE OF WORK: Phase 3
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 11 Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Project Approach & Understanding
B.3 | SCOPE OF WORK: Phase 4
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 12 Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Project Approach & Understanding
B.3 | SCOPE OF WORK: Phase 5
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 13 Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Project Approach & Understanding
B.4 | PROJECT INSIGHTS
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 14 a. Key Issues
The K2 team and their consultants are fully committed to a fast-paced and solution oriented process where we work in partnership with the City of Redding at a level that will become the ‘gold-standard’ for future collaboration.
1. Collaboration begins December 2023
Our timeline assumes that K2 is identified by City
staff to be the developer of choice for this
opportunity. In order to expedite design and
delivery scoping, K2’s team anticipates meeting
with City staff and the City’s affiliate consultants
up to two times per week until full approval of
our contract with the City. After contracting, we
anticipate weekly meeting with City staff and the
City’s environmental consultants on a weekly
basis through approval of the tentative
subdivision map and planned development.
This collaboration will be key! We anticipate that
K2 Development senior management and City
department heads will roll-up-their-sleeves and
pull out the highlighters and red pens at these
meetings to creatively guide the process.
The collaboration will range from removing
roadblocks to approvals to identifying solutions
to avoid pitfalls.
2. Design to Maintain and Improve Access to
the Abutting Southern Property
Honoring the access, and further development
potential, of the southern property is key! Our
conceptual design demonstrates that the project
can 100 percent preserve the existing road
easement on the development site while also
providing a stub-street for future circulation. We
know that there is more than one way to solve
the access issues. K2 commits to early and
honoring consultations with the southern owner
to determine if there are beneficial way to
configure access and create a compatible
neighborhood.
3. Roadway Traffic Calming and Lot Design at
Connections to Abutting Eastern Subdivision
K2’s team will take extra care in designing the
interface with the existing River Ridge Terrace
neighborhood.
The Steamboat Street and Keel Court Road
connections will have traffic calming features
and neighborhood identification similar to what
was successfully implemented for Highland Park
in Redding. Our goal is to have a traditional
separated sidewalk on one side, while providing
a wider mixed-use sidewalk along the opposite
side. This configuration will provide a highquality experience for River Ridge Terrace residents as they make use of the new trails and
open space in this project.
Extra consideration will be given to the design of
the residential lots and homes that abut the
existing residences. It will be important to
maintain compatibility initially, and then
transition to the unique character of this new
project once fully into the development.
4. Early Acquisition of Necessary Internal and
External (Northerly) Roadway Easements
Roadway and trail access to Quartz Hill Road is
an important part of what will make this new
project successful. Additionally, a northern
connection to Quartz Hill Road will lessen the
vehicular impact on River Ridge Terrace while
also providing effective access.
K2 has a letter of intent to acquire rights for the
northern connection.
Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Project Approach & Understanding
B.4 | PROJECT INSIGHTS
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 15 Design a fully-functional project that avoids
any Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) wetland
impact. This approach is intended to ensure
that the grantor’s deadline can be met.
Access to Steamboat Street will likely be a
temporary single-lane connection and there
will be small arch culverts to bridge wetlands
at several places throughout the project. We
also anticipate a few locations where the full
road width will not be constructed for the
initial product delivery.
While K2 is a real estate developer at its core, we
also have identified Monument ROW, Inc. as a
member of our team due to their extensive
experience with right of way acquisition for
public projects. Monument will assist the K2
team as necessary to both “clean-up” and
acquire necessary access rights.
At the time of this submittal, there is still some
uncertainty about the status of public road rights
for an easement that is internal to the project.
We also believe that the easement to the north
of the project (to Quartz Hill Road) may not grant
access rights for a public road in its current state.
Right of way acquisition will commence on day
one after getting under contract for this project
so that we can minimize any issues. Our team
will be ready to pivot the design approach as the
public road easement issues become clear.
5. Avoid Direct Impacts to Waters of the
United States in “Base” Project Design
Expediting delineation of Waters of the US and
State (wetlands) is critical. The City will contract
with R.L. Hastings to commence this wetland
delineation work in early December.
Our approach to the wetland issue will be to:
As a second phase of work, concurrent with
the beginnings of housing construction, we
will fill no more than 0.5 acres of ACOE
wetlands under a Nationwide Permit 29. It
will be critical to keep the permanent
wetland takes to less than 0.5 acres and to
manage the schedule carefully.
Perform a CEQA Preliminary Assessment
(IS / MND vs. GP EIR) Consistency Analysis.
Agencies with similar projects have
successfully made a consistency
determination (through documentation) and
shortened the CEQA process by several
months. Remey Moose Manley, an
environmental and land use law firm, as well
as our local expert Bruce Grove, with SHN
Consulting, will collaboratively assess this
option and present findings to the City.
At the same time as we commence the CEQA
Preliminary Assessment activity, our team will
proceed at full-throttle to prepare a
signature-ready administrative draft Initial
Study / Mitigated Negative Declaration
(IS/MND) for the City’s use. In addition, our
Our schedule shows early requests to the ACOE
for Jurisdictional Determination (JD) and PreConstruction Notification (aka Permit Application). We know it can take many months
to receive the approved JD and then 8-12 months
to receive the Nationwide Permit 29 approval.
You will see that we have a plan for success as
articulated in the scope of work and schedule.
6. Expert CEQA Team
Successful delivery is in large part dependent on
high-quality, fast, and defensible CEQA approval.
Our team of experts, led by GHD, will:
Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) team will be ready to prepare and support
the City with tribal consultations, public
review noticing and the notice of
determination.
Provide near signature-ready CEQA
documentation concurrent with the
application package for the tentative map
and Planned Development.
7. Contractor Bidding and Construction
Our team recognizes that this will be a unique
project as it is a publicly funded project but will
be designed, bid, and constructed by a private
developer, engineering and contractor.
In addition to K2 and GHD having vast
experience designing, bidding, and managing
Public Works construction projects, K2 is
currently constructing the downtown Urban
Park which is essentially the same financial,
bidding and construction model that the
Redding Subdivision will use. The Urban Park
was designed, bid, awarded and is currently
being constructed with private companies while
adhering to public agency rules.
Our experience with city projects and city staff
will allow us to streamline the review and
approval process, bid and award the project
adhering to the public procurement process, and
construct the project per the approved plans and
specifications. K2 and GHD have expert
construction managers on the team that are well
versed in all aspects of managing a public works
project.
Project Approach & Understanding
B.4 | PROJECT INSIGHTS
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 16 Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Project Approach & Understanding
B.4 | PROJECT INSIGHTS
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 17 b. Additions
Our team has the long-term vision, experience, and strategic ability to deliver above and beyond what is expected.
1. Expanded Property Acquisitions
The Developer has secured a letter of intent,
included as Exhibit A in this proposal, to acquire
additional access rights essential for optimizing
density, enhancing ingress and egress, and
minimizing impacts on existing developments.
The Developer will actively pursue opportunities
for acquiring additional property and rights-ofway, both public and private, that can benefit the overall development area and maximize the
number of feasible sites.
2. Strategic Financial Leverage
The Developer will actively seek opportunities to
secure additional federal, state, and local grants
to augment project resources for parks and trail
amenities on the subject site and in the
surrounding area. The existing secured funding
presents a unique opportunity and should be
leveraged to the maximum extent possible.
3. Collaborating with Neighboring Properties
and Developments
The Developer will engage in outreach to
neighboring property owners and developers to
explore potential collaboration and coordination
in the development of the subject property. The
goal is to seek alignment on ingress and egress
locations, as well as utility locations and sizing, to
maximize feasibility and enhance the
development prospects of neighboring
properties. The Developer will strive to design a
development plan that maximizes the potential
for future or concurrent housing development.
4. Creating a Trail and Recreation Destination
The Developer will create a neighborhood trail
and park system to serve the subject site and the
surrounding community. The trail system will be
designed to serve as an impetus for future trail
development and extensions in the area. The
Developer recognizes this as an opportunity to
look more expansively in the broader area for
additional trail development and recreational
amenities.
Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) The Peaks
Subdivision Map
850 Quartz Hill Road, Redding, California
FEASIBILITY
DESIGN BY:
Project Approach & Understanding
B.5 | PROJECT CONCEPTS
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 18 As inspiration for the conceptual phase of the project, our team has coined this exciting new subdivision “The Peaks”.
Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
2.03 AC
3.15 AC
0.75 AC
2.95 AC
1.24 AC
1.50 AC
0.35 AC
0.63 AC
1.85 AC
2.67 AC
0.34 AC
0.89 AC
.67 AC
1.28 AC
0.58 AC
2.11 AC
1.49 AC
1.05 AC
0.96 AC
0.60 AC
2.27 AC
0.73 AC
SINGLEFAMILY HOMES
ATTACHEDSINGLE-FAMILY
PARK
GREEN SPACE
VEHICULAL CIRCULATION PEDESTRIAN
CIRCULATION
ENTRANCES
TRAILHEAD PARKING
ENTRYMONUMENT
TO STANFORD
HILLS TRAIL
NORTH
PEAK
PANORAMA
KNOLL
EAST
BUTTE
PARK
4.22 AC
PARK
3.30 AC
Project Approach & Understanding
B.5 | PROJECT CONCEPTS
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 19 The Peaks
Land Use & Circulation Map
850 Quartz Hill Road, Redding, California
LAND USE CIRCULATION
DIAGRAM LEGEND
Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) The Peaks
Site Constraints Map
850 Quartz Hill Road, Redding, California
Project Approach & Understanding
B.5 | PROJECT CONCEPTS
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 20 Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) C
s
e
c
t
i
o
n
Personnel, Experience, Funding
& Schedule
Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 23 C.1 | Developer Information
“Strong communities are built on strong foundations.”
K2 Development Company, Inc.
1011 Parkview Avenue, Suite A
Redding CA 96001
530.244.0596
K2 Development, with principal ownership through K2 Development Company, Inc., is a family-owned and operated company localized to the North State. Investments and projects range from single-family homes and small to midsize multi- family complexes, mid-size commercial, office and warehouse spaces. K2 specializes in new construction and acquisition rehabilitation of affordable housing in the greater Redding area.
K2’s longstanding partnerships with the City of Redding and Shasta County has enabled it to connect local municipalities and nonprofit organizations in an effort to promote various redevelopment projects in the single family, commercial, and multi-family sectors. K2 has been successful in leveraging local housing resources with both federal tax credits and state affordable housing funds.
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Daniel Knott
Chief Financial Officer, K2 Development Company, Inc.
Daniel Knott is the Executive Officer of K2 Development Companies where he is the lead for project financial analysis, project management, and community outreach. Since joining the company in 2006, Daniel has played a key role in the successful completion of over $400MM of real estate development projects in the single family, multi-family, and mixeduse sectors. In addition to his work at K2, Daniel also founded, grew, and eventually sold a successful property management company with over $60MM in real property assets under management. Daniel holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, and is an active member of the community, serving as a board member of the Greater Redding Chamber of Commerce and as a Redding East Rotarian, among other organizations. Daniel is dedicated to supporting the growth and development of the communities in which K2 operates, and is committed to making a positive impact through his work.
Allen Knott
Chief Executive Officer, K2 Development Company, Inc.
Allen A. Knott is CEO of K2 Development Company, Inc. (K2 Development Companies) and is responsible for driving its strategic growth and development. Allen is adept at identifying market opportunities of all types and has developed a passion for building progress within the communities K2 serves. Allen brings a wealth of knowledge and experience in project development and finance strategies to K2, having begun his career at Principal Financial Group where he successfully managed over $1.2 billion in corporate retirement funds. In 2003, Allen founded K2 Development Companies, which has since grown into a successful real estate development business with a reputation of leadership in the development community in Redding, CA and beyond. Allen earned a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, holds a general contractors license, and plays a role in various philanthropic and community-oriented organizations and programs throughout the region.
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 24 C.1 | Developer Information
“Strong communities are built on strong foundations.”
Rocky Slaughter
Chief Operating Officer & General Counsel
Rocky Slaughter serves as Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel to K2 Development Companies. In addition to overseeing the operations of the company, Rocky specializes in the nuances of construction insurance, site safety, risk management and mitigation, and works to ensure K2 is protected from potential liabilities and losses. Rocky has a diverse background in business, marketing, political consulting, the wine industry, and is an attorney at law in the State of California. Prior to contracting with K2 Development Companies, Rocky operated a public relations and web technology company serving over 50 clients in the North State over the course of seven years. Rocky graduated Cum Laude with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from Northeastern University and a Juris Doctorate with Distinction from the University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law.
K2 DEVELOPMENT EXECUTIVE TEAM
Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Environmental
& Design
Subdivision
Infrastructure Homebuilding Finance & Marketing
Kamesh Vedula
PE, TE - PIC
Brad Swearington
PE Ore - Subdivision
Eric Phan
PE - Subdivision Approval
GHD
Advisory Team
Development Services
Brandon Tenney, PE, QSD/PAssistant Project Manager
Daniel KnottChief Financial Officer
Phil Quintana,Construction Manager
Ron DeMaagdProject Manager
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
C.2 | Executive Project Management
Allen Knott, CEOPrincipal-in-Charge
Russ Wenham, PE, TE, PTOE, QSD/PProject Manager
Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419)
SURVEYING/MAPPING
Aerotech Mapping*
Eric Phan, PLS*
Richard Maddock, PLS
Jeff Cook
CIVIC DESIGN/GRADING
Brandon Tenney, PE*
Chris Bader, PE
Owen Goode
Brad Swearington
HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULICS
Patrick Sullivan, PE
UTILITY DESIGN
Patrick Tortora, PE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
& COMPLETE STREETS
Lucas Piper, LA
Emily Shandy, AICP, LCI
ENTITLEMENT PROCESSING
& CITY COORDINATION
Russ Wenham, PE, TE, PTOE, QSD/P*
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
& CEQA DOCUMENTATION
Brian Bacciarini*
Andrea Hilton
Christian Hernandez
SURVEYING
Richard Maddock, PLS
Jeff Cook
CIVIL DESIGN/GRADING
Brandon Tenney, PE*
Chris Bader, PE
Owen Goode
Brad Swearington
Eric Phan, PE
HYDROLOGY/HYDRAULICS
Patrick Sullivan, PE
UTILITY DESIGN
Patrick Tortora, PE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
& COMPLETE STREETS
Lucas Piper, LA
Emily Shandy, AICP, LCI
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS
Brian Bacciarini*
Andrea Hilton
Christian Hernandez
RIGHT OF WAY/PUBLIC WORKS
Monument Firm*
Bob Morrison*
Design
& Permitting
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Jeff Bline*
Greg Tyler
ENVIRONMENTAL PERMIT &
MAPPING
Brian Bacciarini*
Andrea Hilton
Christian Hernandez
SURVEYING
Richard Maddock, PLS
Jeff Cook
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 26
MORE INFORMATION ON SUBSEQUENT PAGES
Construction
& Final Map
Entitlement
Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Ron DeMaagd*
Project Manager
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 27
MORE INFORMATION ON SUBSEQUENT PAGES
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Ron DeMaagd, K2
PRE-CONSTRUCTION
Tyler Enterprises
Jeff Bline, GHD
BIDDING
GHD
CONTRACTING/PROCUREMENT
GHD/K2
QUALITY CONTROL
Jeff Bline, GHD*
PROJECT FINANCE
Jessie Toombs, K2
WAGE COMPLIANCE
Gafcon
Dominic DeLello, K2
Subdivision
Infrastructure
Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 28
MORE INFORMATION ON SUBSEQUENT PAGES
Homebuilding
Phil Quintana,
Construction Manager
DESIGN
Kevin Eagerly, RGA Architecture*
BUDGETING
Josh Brand, Cow Creek Builders
Raul Nunez, K2
CONSTRUCTABILITY REVIEWS
Phil Quintana, K2
Richard Olsen, K2
PROCUREMENT
Richard Olsen, K2
PROJECT FINANCE
Jessie Toombs, K2
SCHEDULE
Raul Nunez. K2
COST CONTROL
Allen Knott, K2
QUALITY CONTROL
Richard Olsen, K2
LABOR COMPLIANCE
GAFCON
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
Phil Quintana, K2
Raul Nunez, K2
Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 29
MORE INFORMATION ON SUBSEQUENT PAGES
Finance & Marketing
Daniel Knott
Chief Financial Officer
PRODUCT FIT
Allen Knott, K2
Daniel Knott, K2
SUBDIVISION LEGAL
Bruce Inman, Inman Law Group
CONSTRUCTION FINANCE
Kristin Cooper Carter,
Grant Management Assoc.
Kevin Rodin, CD-RG, Inc.
GRANT WRITING
Dominic Delello, K2
Krisin Cooper Carter,
Grant Management Assoc.
PROJECT LEVEL MARKETING
Erin Ross, K2
HOME SALES
Local Real Estate Brokers
LENDER PACKAGES
Local Mortgage Professionals
BUYER WORKSHOPS
Erin Ross, K2
LENDING PROGRAM MANAGEMENT
Erin Ross, K2
FEASABILITY
Dominic DeLello, K2
Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Ron DeMaagd, K2 Development | Project Manager
80% of full-time work hours dedicated for pre-construction & construction phases Ron is the Construction Manager at K2 Development Companies, where he focuses on site development and infrastructure. Ron has over 30 years of experience in surveying, design, construction, and project management. Ron has a diverse background in site development, road, utility, drainage, bridge, and mechanical projects. Prior to joining K2, Ron worked with the Bureau of Land Management, Tehama County, Cal Trans, and served as Construction Manager for the City of Redding, overseeing the delivery of capital and private development projects totaling over $70MM per year. Ron attended the Civil Engineering program at CSU Chico and also holds a Land Surveyor in Training license.
Experience:
35 years of experience in Surveying, Design and Construction Management Key Projects:
Churn Creek Road Realignment, Shasta View round about, Placer Street Rehab, Quartz Hill Rehab, Market Center Streets and Circulation, Block 7 Streets and Circulation, Urban Park, Center of Hope Site and Civil, Alturas Crossing Site and Civil, and Burney Commons Site and Civil.
Qualifications:
Chico State Civil Engineering Program, California LSIT
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 30 C.3 | Responsible Personnel & Key Partners
Key Team Members
Phil Quintana, K2 Development | Construction Manager
30% of full-time work hours dedicated for pre-construction & construction phases Phil Quintana is the Senior Construction Manager at K2 Development Companies, where he oversees all vertical construction activities. Phil has extensive experience in construction management, having worked on a variety of projects including multifamily, school, retail, restaurant, and structural retrofit projects across the State of California. Phil is well-versed in all aspects of successful field work including safety, schedule, quality, and budgeting. In his role, he manages general contractors, architects, and consultants, creates project budgets, and tracks schedules to ensure projects stay on track. Phil’s constructability and schedule reviews are key in preventing cost and schedule overruns.
Experience:
17 years of construction experience and 10 years in management experience Key Projects:
Superintendent for more than a dozen multi-million dollar Bay Area Projects including the Henry J. Kaiser Civic Center in Oakland, the Intercontinental Hotel in San Francisco, and the UCSF Mission Bay Childcare Center as well as management services for several K2 Development Projects.
Qualifications:
B.A. American Studies/History, C.S.U. Chico
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 31 C.3 | Responsible Personnel & Key Partners
Key Team Members
Daniel Knott, K2 Development | Finance & Marketing
30% of full-time work hours dedicated for pre-construction & construction phases Daniel Knott is the Executive Officer of K2 Development Companies where he is the lead for project financial analysis and project management. Since joining the company in 2006, Daniel has played a key role in the successful completion of over $400MM of real estate development projects in the single family, multi-family, and mixed-use sectors. In addition to his work at K2, Daniel also founded, grew, and eventually sold a successful property management company with over $60MM in real property assets under management. Daniel holds a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration from Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, and is an active member of the community, serving as a board member of the Greater Redding Chamber of Commerce and as a Redding East Rotarian, among other organizations.
Experience:
18 years experience in finance, management, and development Key Projects:
Market Center Apartments, California Place Apartments, Olive Ranch, Pioneer Park, Ridgestone Villas, and Aluturas Crossing
Qualifications:
Bachelor of Science in Finance and Accounting, Cal Poly San Luis Obispo, California, Licensed Real Estate Broker with expertise in Property Management and new home sales. Over $500 million in Development experience across Multi-Family, Single Family, Commercial, and Public Infrastructure projects. Demonstrated success in grant writing and securing public funding.
Russ Wenham, GHD | Project Manager
25% of full-time work hours dedicated for pre-construction & construction phases Russ Wenham brings over 39 years of experience designing and managing the delivery of hundreds of projects involving developers and local, state, and federal agencies, including Plans, Specifications, and Estimates (PS&E), traffic management plans, stage construction plans, and turn-key construction management and inspection services, including over five years of federal-aid construction experience.
Russ was Caltrans' District 2 Deputy District Director for 10 years.
Key Projects:
Dignity Health Regional Cancer Campus - EIR and Entitlements, Churn Creek Marketplace Shopping Center - Entitlements, construction documents, and freeway, interchange improvements, Downtown Street Recirculation - Documents and construction management.
Qualifications: BS, Civil Engineering, Graduate Studies, Water Resources & Urban Planning; Civil Engineer, CA; Traffic Engineer, CA; Professional Traffic Operations Engineer, CA; Qualified Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Developer/Practitioner, CASQA; Small Unmanned Aerial System Certificate, FAA Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Brian Bacciarini, GHD | Environmental Studies
25% of full-time work hours dedicated during CEQA phase Brian has 21 years of consulting experience specializing in CEQA and NEPA compliance and natural resource agency permitting. He has extensive experience managing environmental reviews for a wide spectrum of local, state, federal, and private clients. Brian has a full understanding of the current CEQA Guidelines and NEPA regulations and good working relationships with regulators and federal funding program managers. His project experience includes water supply projects, treatment facilities, sewer collection systems, storm drain improvements, telecommunication facilities, roadways and bridges, airports, trails, schools and colleges, and residential, commercial, institutional, and mixed-use projects.
Qualifications: – BS, Environmental Studies, Sonoma State University –Certificate, Federal Environmental Requirements for Local Agency Transportation Projects Brandon Tenney, GHD | Assistant Project Manager & Lead Civil Engineer 35% of full-time work hours dedicated through duration of project Brandon Tenney has over 17 years of experience designing and managing the delivery of engineering projects from the planning phase, to surveying, design, PS&E, construction management, and inspection services. He is experienced with all types of projects, both privately funded and local, state, and federally funded projects as well as managing agency approvals, environmental requirements, and Caltrans and local assistance policies and procedures for state and federally funded projects.
Qualifications: BS, Civil Engineering; Civil Engineer, CA; Qualified Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Developer / Practitioner, CA
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 32 C.3 | Responsible Personnel & Key Partners
Key Team Members
Jeff Bline, GHD | Construction Manager
50% of full-time work hours dedicated for pre-construction & construction phases Jeff Bline is GHD’s resident engineer with over 29 years of construction experience, including over five years of federal-aid construction experience. His resident engineer experience with Caltrans includes: Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) overlays, seal coats, new freeway interchanges, stormdamage emergency projects, rural bridges, and rural highway stabilization projects. Jeff oversaw approximately 90 projects totaling over $330 million.
Qualifications: BS, Civil Engineering; Civil Engineer, CA; Qualified Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) Developer/Practitioner, CA
Eric Phan, Aerotech Mapping
15% of full-time work hours dedicated during mapping phase.
Eric is the General Manager of the Las Vegas office and has been with AeroTech Mapping, Inc. (ATM) since 2013. Eric has 24 years of experience in the surveying and photogrammetric industries. Eric has successfully managed over 1,500 surveying mapping projects during his distinguished career. His software experience includes Trimble GPS Equipment and Software, ESRI’s ArcGIS/Info, Intergraph’s Microstation Site Works, Autodesk Civil 3D products, and UltraCAM Essential AeroTriangulation & Orthophotography, Summit Evolution Softcopy System.
Qualifications: – BS, Geomatics Engineering, California State University, BS, Survey Engineering, California State University, American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ASPRS), Certified Photogrammetrist (CP) #1589
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) About GHD
GHD provides transportation planning and engineering, environmental, advisory, digital, and construction services to private and public sector clients. Operating globally and delivering services locally, we offer clients the ability to develop a working relationship with our local staff while having access to our global experience base. Put simply, we work where our clients work. Our business model is to work internationally and deliver locally.
Firm Information
Established in 1928, GHD is a wholly owned subsidiary - a privately held international engineering firm owned by our people and operating across five continents. We are one of the world’s leading professional services companies operating in the global markets of Transportation, Water, Energy & Resources, Environment, and Property & Buildings. Our people can offer decades of knowledge, as well as a deep understanding of the challenges facing businesses and communities today. We deliver projects with high standards of safety, quality, and ethics across the entire asset value chain. Driven by a client service-led culture, we connect the knowledge, skill, and experience of our people with innovative practices, technical capabilities, and robust systems to create lasting community benefits.
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 33 C.3 | Responsible Personnel & Key Partners
Consultant Firm GHD: Environmental & Design Lead
GHD California Office Locations
Globally, we employ more than 11,000 people in 200 offices and have delivered in more than 90 countries. In North America, our resources include 4,000 people with more than 130 locations across the region. Our business model is to work internationally and deliver locally. Put simply, we work where our clients work. Our staff in the US West region includes nearly 420 staff, including more than 240 engineers and more than 30 technical specialists in a wide spectrum of disciplines.
Cameron Park
Concord
Emeryville
Eureka
Fresno
Irvine
Long Beach
Redding
Roseville
Sacramento
San Diego
San Francisco
San Jose
San Luis Obispo
Santa Rosa
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
90+ years in operation
135+ countries served
200+ offices worldwide
$2.3B revenue in 2020
5 global markets
10K people
50+ service lines
Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 34 C.3 | Responsible Personnel & Key Partners
About Monument
Monument, a DBE and SBE certified firm, is a full- service real estate and right-of-way company providing exceptional service, strategic planning, innovation and timely delivery. We serve local, state and federal agencies, transportation authorities and engineering partners with public infrastructure projects throughout California. At Monument, we understand the difference an experienced, solutions-minded right-of-way partner can bring in achieving the goals and objectives of a project and that’s exactly what we are. We have successfully delivered hundreds of projects as a Team with our success attributed to our Company motto. . . we listen, we innovate, we deliver.
Project References
CAPITAL SOUTHEAST CONNECTOR PROJECT
Capital Southeast Connector JPA
The Capital Southeast Connector JPA objective was to reconstruct 20 miles of the Grant Line Road between Mosher Road and Bradshaw Road as a four lane thoroughfare with an adjacent Class 1 bike and pedestrian trail on the west and north side of the alignment.
RIVERFRONT STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
City of West Sacramento
Monument is working with the City of West Sacramento to deliver the River Front Street extension project. This grant funded project extends Riverfront Street and widens 5th Street under the US50 along the City of West Sacramento’s Waterfront.
The project includes acquisition from over 10 parcels, 5 of which are part of a larger development agreement.
CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED RAIL PROJECT
California High Speed Rail Authority
We have done a lot of work for the California High Speed Rail Authority (HSR). The purpose of the project is to construct the portion of the HST from Madera to Bakersfield. This included multiple grade separations at existing roadways, realignment of State Route 99 in Fresno, large bridges over the Fresno River and SR 99.
This project included every major right of way activity.
Northern California Office Location
2450 Venture Oaks Way, Suite 240
Sacramento, CA 95833
Consultant Firm Monument: Right of Way Acquisition
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) About AeroTech Mapping
For the past 20 years, AeroTech Mapping (ATM) has supplied high-quality geospatial solutions, services, and support for the A/E/C industry. We’ve done projects across the United States and abroad using the latest technology and resources, combined with a highly educated and experienced staff. Our mission is to bring our clients the highest quality geospatial products and services available.
ATM has a diverse group of geospatial professionals with over 200 years of combined experience on the photogrammetric industry. With over 10,000 completed projects to date, our team has the expertise to bring your projects to life. In addition, our state-of-the-art facilities and equipment improve our efficiency,. thereby reducing our schedule times, so you are never waiting on your mapping consultant.
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 35 C.3 | Responsible Personnel & Key Partners
By selecting AeroTech Mapping, your team will
have an experienced and trusted aerial
mapping provider, While building strong
working partnerships, our goal is to provide
superior quality mapping products on time. As a
result, we will bring value to your team.
Aerial Photography
Digital Terrain Monitoring
Topographic & Planimetric Mapping
Digital Orthophotography
Volumetric Calculations
Bathymetric Surveying
Land Development
Transportation
Hydrology
Mining
Forestry
Coastal Studies
Homeland Security
Airport Infrastructure
Energy (Solar/Wind)
In-House Services:
A/E/C/ Sectors:
Consultant Firm Aerotech: Design, Survey, & Mapping
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) About RMM
Founded in 1982 by Michael H. Remy, the firm, now Remy Moose Manley, LLP, is a law partnership focused on providing a wide variety of expert legal environmental and land use services to public and private clients, including cities and counties, state agencies, environmental consultants, project applicants, and environmental organizations located throughout California. While the firm’s practice specializes in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Remy Moose Manley attorneys are also experts in the State Planning and Zoning Law, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Integrated Waste Management Act, the California Coastal Act, the Federal Endangered Species Act, the California Endangered Species Act, the Federal Clean Water Act, and other related land use and environmental statutes.
Each attorney at Remy Moose Manley, LLP provides both administrative and environmental litigation services.
The firm does not separate its lawyers into litigators and non-litigators. Since its founding, Remy Moose Manley has gradually expanded to its current size, consisting of 15 attorneys, including one who is “of counsel.” The firm now has seven partners. Remy Moose Manley, LLP is a Certified Women-Owned Business. A description of each attorney’s qualifications is available upon request.
Remy Moose Manley, LLP, represents a wide variety of clients in land use and environmental matters. Such clients include numerous public agencies and project applicants. The breadth of the firm’s experience on behalf of such clients gives the members of the firm detailed knowledge regarding the differing perspectives held by the various participants in environmental and planning disputes. A list of the firm’s past and current clients is available upon request.
Throughout its history, the firm has been involved in many major environmental cases, including more than 60 published California Supreme Court and Court of Appeal decisions (case descriptions and pleadings available upon request).
Remy Moose Manley, LLP, brings a unique strength to this team due to extensive experience on critical CEQA issues in Redding, California. The firm’s attorneys have past experience working with GHD Inc., SHN and City of Redding staff, toward successful projects.
Office Location
555 Capitol Mall, Suite 800 • Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: (916) 443-2745 • Facsimile: (916) 443-9017
Email: [email protected]
www.rmmenvirolaw.com
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 36 C.3 | Responsible Personnel & Key Partners
Consultant Firm RMM: Land Planning, CEQA Documents, & Legal Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Environmental Planning. SHN provides full CEQA/NEPA Lead Agency services, which includes reviewing private applicant projects, and commenting as a responsible agency. We also perform initial scoping, conducting (or requesting) necessary special studies, preparing initial studies, determining screening process and pathway for meeting CEQA/NEPA requirements, noticing, processing public review, and responding to comments and filing all notices with the State Clearinghouse and County Clerk. We keep up with the latest CEQA and NEPA case law and annually instruct municipalities on how the previous case law could affect their CEQA and NEPA practices.
Civil Engineering. Civil Site Design; Public Works Infrastructure; Transportation and Bridges; Retaining Walls; Marina/Port; Water and Wastewater; Hydraulic and Water Resources; Pipelines.
Geosciences. Geology and Geotechnical; Soils and Material Testing; Foundations; Landslide Assessments; Seismic, Tsunami and Coastal Flooding Assessments; Soil Stabilization Techniques.
Surveying. Conventional Land Surveying; Topographic Mapping, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV/Drones) GPS & ArcGIS; Boundary and other Property Line Work; Conservation Easement Mapping and Legal Descriptions.
Environmental Sciences. Environmental Site Assessments (Phase 1, 2 3); Site Remediation; CERCLA/RCRA; Hydrogeologic Assessments; Hazardous Materials Assessments and Investigations.
About SHN
SHN is a full service consulting firm providing clients in the western United States with award-winning engineering, environmental, geologic and related services. For over 45 years, we have been providing clients with these services from our offices in Eureka, Arcata, Fort Bragg, Redding, and Willits, California, and Coos Bay and Klamath Falls, Oregon. With over 115 employees, we have a wide range of experienced staff that provides exceptional service to our Clients. This variety of personnel enables us to offer a broad range of services, from site investigation and environmental planning, to facility and site design work, construction inspection/administration and project monitoring.
Range of Services
SHN provides a full range of services for public and private projects. Our project managers have worked on numerous complex, multidisciplinary projects requiring technical expertise, creative solutions for design modifications or mitigation, and a thorough understanding of local, State and federal regulations. This breadth of experience allows SHN to employ a diverse pool of professional staff that brings value far beyond their credentials. SHN’s experience is found in our five main service areas:
Through the application of both time-tested and contemporary methods, SHN offers its clients efficient, practical, sustainable solutions to challenging problems. As a result of its services, SHN strives to contribute to a socially responsible, and rewarding environment for its clients, employees, and community at large.
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 37 C.3 | Responsible Personnel & Key Partners
Consultant Firm SHN: CEQA Document Support
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) About ENPLAN
Since 1980, ENPLAN has provided environmental science, planning, and information services throughout northern California to both public and private sector clients.
We have successfully guided hundreds of projects through the environmental compliance process. Project sites have ranged in size from small, urban in-fill parcels to large geographic areas. We have also compiled geographic information systems (GIS), web map portals, and geospatial data sets for numerous municipalities and other entities.
Throughout this work, ENPLAN has earned a reputation for being comprehensive, thorough, and conscientious.
The majority of our clients have relied on us exclusively for years due to our proven ability and the consistently high-quality results delivered.
ENPLAN specialists are trained, certified, and experienced in delivering a wide range of environmental analysis and compliance services. Our qualifications have established us as leaders in the field of natural resource evaluation and management. Services we provide include the following:
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 38 C.3 | Responsible Personnel & Key Partners
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Compliance
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Compliance
Biological Studies
Wetland Evaluations
Cultural Resource Studies
Noise Studies
Air Quality Analyses
Hazardous Materials Assessments
Visual Impact Simulations and Analyses
Regulatory Compliance and Permitting
Construction and Post-Construction Monitoring
Site Restoration
Geographic Information Systems
Web Mapping
LIDAR Digital Elevation Data
Orthoimagery
Public Web Viewer Portal
Staff Training and Technical Support
GIS Software and Maintenance
Office Headquarters
3179 Bechelli Lane
Suite 100
Redding, CA 96002
(530) 221-0440 x3
Consultant Firm ENPLAN: Environmental Permitting Support Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) About RGA
With over 20 years of experience, RGA is a full-service architecture and engineering firm serving all market segments in Northern California and beyond. As a locally owned and operated firm, RGA prides itself in providing personal and dedicated attention to all projects, large and small. From the world-renowned Sierra Nevada Brewing Company facilities, to master-planned communities, to historic renovations – our projects represent a range of clients as diverse as the community we grew from. RGA knows the values of developing and maintaining strong working relationships with our colleagues, clients, and employees alike. Our leadership shares an approach to design that is both innovative and practical, providing design solutions that are forward thinking yet grounded in common sense. Although our projects are big, our small office culture allows RGA to achieve a level of personal communication, community connectivity, and employee engagement unmatched by other large-name design firms. Creativity, knowledge, and the ability to communicate are the foundation of our business.
Services:
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 39 C.3 | Responsible Personnel & Key Partners
Consultant Firm Russell, Gallaway Associates, Inc.
Architecture and Engineering
CASp Certified
LEED AP Certified
Site Planning
Building Code Analysis
Space Planning
Exterior Elevation Studies
ADA Studies
Renovations / Alterations / Additions
Outdoor Facilities
Photorealistic Rendering
Specification Manuals
AS-Built Drawings
Architectural Review Presentations
Interior Design
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
Design in Wood, Steel, Concrete, Precast
Concrete, and Masonry
Seismic Evaluation
Risk Assessment
Failure Analysis
Retrofit Design
Damage Repair Design
Solar Panel Support
Pre-Lease / Pre-Purchase Evaluation
Construction Observation
Computer Modeling
Finite Element Analysis
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Market Center Apartments - Completed year 2020
Description: A mixed-use and streets project in the central business district in Downtown Redding.
Project Characteristics: 82 Affordable Housing Units above 22,000 SF of commercial space and 84 subterranean parking spaces.
Value: $40MM
Olive Ranch Housing Development - Ongoing
Description: A four phase development with commercial
retail, affordable, senior and SFR market rate housing. Phases I, II, & III are complete. Phase IV and V projected completion 2025.
Project Characteristics: 234 units with 51 dedicated to seniors and 22 market rate units in Oroville, CA.
Value: 75MM
Ridgestone Villas - Completed 2008
Description: Luxury Townhomes with a Community Pool and landscaped open space and gathering areas.
Project Characteristics: 28 Market Rate Units in Redding, CA.
Value: $7MM
C.4 | DEVELOPER EXPERIENCE
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
Kennett Court Housing Development - Completed 2022
Description: Multi-family New Construction. The project is a public private partnership with K2 and the City of Redding and was partially funded through 46 project-based vouchers.
Project Characteristics: 132 Affordable Housing Units, 20,000 SF of open space with urban greening in Redding, CA.
Value: $55MM
K2 Development Companies
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 40 Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Burney Commons - Substantially Complete
Description: Quality wood frame affordable housing
fourplexes living featuring a community room, playground, and landscaped common areas.
Project Characteristics: 30 Affordable Housing Units in Burney, CA.
Value: $14MM
California Place Apartments - Completed 2022
Description: A mixed-use project in the central business district of Downtown Redding that also included the
development of over two miles of context-sensitive bikeways, refurbished streets and a pedestrian-activated alley.
Project Characteristics: 79 Affordable Housing Units
Value: 66MM
C.4 | DEVELOPER EXPERIENCE
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
Pioneer Park - Completed 2013
Description: Single Family Residences designed to provide luxury living in a gated subdivision.
Project Characteristics: 14 Single Family Residences in Redding, CA. Received City of Redding Design Award.
Value: $7MM
K2 Development Companies
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 41 Alturas Crossing - Substantially Complete
Description: Quality, wood frame, low rise, affordable housing living featuring a community room, playground, and
landscaped common areas.
Project Characteristics: 39 Affordable Housing Units in Redding, CA.
Value: $30MM
Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Rivercrest Subdivision - Completed in 2007
Description: a 96-lot, single-family subdivision, including:
– Entitlement Planning, Site Design, and Management
– Utility Planning and Design
– Surveying and Final Maps
– Hydrology and Hydraulics Design
– Erosion Control Design
– Construction Engineering Support
– Preparation of Individual Plot Plans
Located in Redding – City Park Design
Client: Rivercrest Partners
Key Personnel: Russ Wenham, Brandon Tenney
Sonata Subdivision - Ongoing
Description:
GHD delivered a small-lot, single-family development with 84 lots, including:
– Entitlement Planning, Site Design, and Project Management – Utility Planning and Design
– Surveying and Final Maps
– Hydrology and Hydraulics Design
– Erosion Control Design
Located in Redding – Construction Engineering Support
Client: Deane Development
Key Personnel: Russ Wenham, Brandon Tenney, Meg Sigler
Churn Creek Marketplace Shopping Center - Ongoing
Description: GHD delivered a 150+/--square-foot commercial shopping center, including:
– Use Permit and Tentative Map Amendments
– Surveying and Monumentation
– Right of Way Dedications and Private Easements
– All Civil Engineering, Stormwater and Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4)
– City Street and Caltrans Freeway Ramp Designs
– Construction Management
Located in Redding
Client: City of Redding, California Gold Development, Panda Express, Jamba Juice, La-Z-Boy Key Personnel: Russ Wenham, Kamesh Vedula, Brandon Tenney, Jeff Bline, Greg Tyler, Chris Badger
C.4 | DEVELOPER EXPERIENCE
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
GHD
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 42 Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Located in Redding
Client: Dignity Health; Cunningham
Group Architecture, Inc
Key Personnel: Russ Wenham,
Brandon Tenney, Kamesh Vedula,
Chris Badger
City Lights Apartments - Completed in 2017
Description: GHD was retained by Hilltop Development, Inc., to perform full entitlement planning, coordination of City approvals, construction documents and final map, including:
– Tentative Map
– Surveying and Monumentation
– All Civil Engineering, Stormwater, and Treatments
Located in Redding
Client: Hilltop Development, Inc
Key Personnel: Russ Wenham, Brandon Tenney
Sierra Pacific Regional Cancer Center - Ongoing
Description: GHD was the lead consultant for the entitlement of the medical campus, including coordination of an
Environmental Impact Report. GHD is currently designing the civil engineering for Phase 1 of the development. GHD’s services include:
– Site Planning and Design
– Surveying, Tentative Map and Property Line Adjustments – Hydrology, Hydraulics, and MS4 Design
– Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) Approval
– Landscape Architecture
– Off-Site Roadway Design
Downtown Redding Streets Circulation Project - 2021
Description: GHD delivered planning, design, and
construction management for the new streets in Downtown Redding, including:
– Architectural Planning and Design
– Utility Planning and Design
– Surveying
– Hydrology, Hydraulics and MS4 Design
– Landscape Architecture
– Streetscape
– Construction Management
Located in Redding
Client: City of Redding
Key Personnel: Russ Wenham, Meg Sigler, Jeff Cooke, Jeff Bline, Greg Tyler C.4 | DEVELOPER EXPERIENCE
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
GHD
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 43 Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) C.5 | PLANNING & CONTROL
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 44 K2 Development Companies will assume a
central role in ensuring project
constructability adheres to established
budgets while actively addressing any
potential development impediments. GHD
will lead the environmental and design of
the project. While K2 Development
Companies will hold responsibility and
control over the contract with the City of
Redding, GHD will maintain an integral and
direct engagement with City Staff and
relevant departments.
The development team is fully committed to
partnering closely with City staff to ensure
the project meets projected deadlines,
adheres to established financial regulations,
and aligns with the project's overall intent.
We recognize the planning and
development process of this project as a
collaborative effort among the City of
Redding, the Design Team, and the
Developer. The Developer will work diligently
to guarantee that the project remains within
budget, adheres to established timelines,
and fulfills its intended purpose.
In close collaboration with assigned City Staff and agencies, the Developer will actively work towards meeting key project design milestones as outlined in our project scope.
We understand that successful project results from maintaining tight control throughout the lifespan of the project. Maintenance is our focus and responsibility as a developer.
Here’s how we do it:
MAINTAIN RECORDS & ORGANIZATION
K2 Development Companies has made significant investments in industry-leading project management tools, with Procore as the cornerstone for construction and development project management.
Our suite includes essential functionalities, fully deployed for this project and accessible to project partners and City staff.
Project Budgets
Bidding & Estimating
Project Directories
Plan Management
Meeting Records
Submittals and RFI’s
Billing and Approvals
Contract Management
Cost Reports
As-Built Records
Document Retention
Reporting
Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) C.5 | PLANNING & CONTROL
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 45
MAINTAIN COST
Early and updated milestone reviews of constructability and cost estimation with refinements made upon progress.
Full transparency of project costs, commitments, key subcontracts with monthly updated project budget forecasting.
Prior approvals on all change orders.
Monthly cost reports.
MAINTAIN SCHEDULE
Attitude of urgency to the delivery of project milestones.
Early and continuous meetings with external agencies with communicated deadlines.
Schedules updated and distributed monthly, with milestone objectives communicated weekly. Key milestone dates shared with working groups at the start and end of each week.
Broader schedule updates made available via an online portal for project teams' review and updates.
Don’t miss a deadline when you have control.
MAINTAIN SCOPE AND QUALITY
Collaborative approach to defining the project's contract scope.
Ongoing meetings to control scope creep and ensure consistency with project objectives.
Recurring meetings with City Department Heads and Staff throughout the design and development process.
Written Quality Management Plan.
MAINTAIN REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
Monthly review of wage compliancy and external 3rd party controls, with data collection and reporting.
Kick-off meeting with project partners and regulatory agencies to ensure a welldeveloped approach to regulatory compliance before full engagement.
Establish direct and regular contact with regulatory funding authorities to resolve any questions and considerations throughout the project.
Clearly understand project closeout and reporting requirements right from the start.
Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) C.6 | SCHEDULE - Short Version
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 46 Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) C.6 | SCHEDULE - Long Version for PDF
Personnel, Experience, Funding, & Schedule
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 47 Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) D
section
FinancialViability
Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) section
Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) D.1 | PROJECT BUDGET
Financial Viability
CONSTRUCTION
The construction budget will cover the cost of subdivision build out including earthwork and grading, wet and dry utilities, curb gutter & sidewalk, paving, lighting, and striping. We are assuming that parks and walking trails will be part of the home construction. Our team understands that this project will be subject to the public procurement process and the requirements associated with that process.
COST: $14,500,000
DEVELOPMENT & PROJECT MANAGEMENT
K2 Development will act as the Developer and overall Project Manager through project completion. Our team will manage the schedule, documents, and financials.
COST: $2,225,000
DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT
GHD will lead the design effort and staff the construction management team.
COST: $2,225,000
TOTAL PROJECT COSTS: $18,950,000
There is $19,178,586 budgeted by the city for this project.
ITEM
Earthwork and Grading
Wet and Dry Utilities
Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk
Base, AC, Sign and Striping
Lighting
Parks and Trails
Permits and Fees
TOTAL
ESTIMATED COST
$1,800,000.00
$5,500,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$2,500,000.00
$700,000.00
$1,500,000.00
$1,000,000.00
$14 ,500,000.00
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 51 Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) D.2 | STATUS & FINANCIAL HISTORY
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 52 Organization Status:
K2 Development Companies has been an
integral part of the construction and
development landscape in the greater Shasta
County area since our establishment in 2001. Our
enduring commitment to enhancing the
community is evident through our longstanding
collaboration with the City of Redding. Over the
years, we have successfully delivered a diverse
range of projects, addressing housing and
infrastructure needs across various income levels.
Throughout this journey, we have consistently
upheld the highest standards of business
integrity, establishing ourselves as a trusted and
principled partner.
Project Capacity:
In the past five years alone, K2 Development
Companies has exhibited remarkable prowess in
project execution. Our successful completion of
construction management and development
services for over 800 housing units underscores
our capability to navigate the complexities of
diverse projects. Simultaneously, our adept
financial resource management is exemplified by
securing financing totaling over $400 million for
a variety of construction endeavors. These
accomplishments speak volumes about our
capacity to deliver results that exceed
expectations.
Strategic Partnerships:
At the core of our success lie the meaningful
partnerships we have fostered with public
entities such as the City of Redding, City of
Oroville, City of Chico, Shasta County, and Butte
County. These collaborations are a testament to
our dedication to community-driven projects. By
aligning our goals with those of our partners, we
ensure that our projects not only meet but
exceed the needs and expectations of the
communities we serve.
Equity and Debt Relationships:
Our ability to secure financing and collaborate
with esteemed equity partners sets us apart.
Partnerships with financial institutions such as
Royal Bank of Canada, Raymond James, JP
Morgan, Fannie Mae, Redstone Equity, and R4
Capital exemplify the trust placed in us by
industry leaders. The existence of a $2 million
debt facility is a tangible demonstration of our
proactive stance in addressing project timing
constraints, specifically related to accounts
payable. Moreover, our diverse lending
relationships with Citi Community Capital,
Banner Bank, Tri Counties Bank, and
Cornerstone Community Bank, among others,
contribute to fortifying our financial foundation.
Financial History:
K2 Development Companies certifies that
throughout our operational history, we have
maintained an unblemished record. We have not
incurred any defaults, debarments, suspensions,
bankruptcy, or loan defaults. This commitment
to financial prudence and reliability underscores
our steadfast approach to ensuring the stability
and success of every project we undertake.
Financial Viability
Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) E
section
SubdivisionAcquistion&BuildOut
Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) E. | SUBDIVISON ACQUISITION & BUILD OUT
Subdivision Acquisiton & Build Out
“Our team thrives on pushing
boundaries, seamlessly blending
form and function to create
spaces that not only meet
modern needs but redefine them
with an innovative touch.”
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 55 Approach design with a focus on timeless
architectural aesthetics to ensure
enduring appeal.
Highlight covered patios on front
elevations to foster resident engagement
and a sense of community.
Exercise caution with square footage,
emphasizing efficiency floor plans.
Focus on design that maximizes
construction efficiency and value.
Develop master floor plans adaptable to
varying lot sizes, ensuring flexibility and
neighborhood cohesiveness. Plans will be
developed at a square footage and
amenity level that is both attractive and
cost feasible for buyers under market
conditions.
Explore additional density options in
suitable areas for attached single-family
housing, aiming to enhance
neighborhood density and reduce
construction and land costs.
Establish reasonable design standards
ensuring a cohesive neighborhood,
aligning with the City of Redding's
planning guidelines and project vision.
Create Covenants, Conditions, and
Restrictions (CCRs) to preserve the
development's long-term quality.
Innovative Design Philosophy
Establish channels for gathering feedback
and addressing community concerns.
Demonstrate a commitment to
community integration and well-being.
K2 Development Companies is flexible in
assuming various roles in the
homebuilding phase, aligning with City of
Redding goals and project feasibility.
Assist in evaluating the feasibility of bulk
market-rate lot sales to homebuilders with
guaranteed provisions for home
construction.
Facilitate the solicitation of proposals from
homebuilders, with a focus on local
engagement and equitable distribution of
opportunities.
Benchmark the feasibility of in-house
construction and development of marketrate homes.
Present a summary of options to the City
of Redding to maximize the rate and
feasibility of the market rate home
construction.
Community Integration
Home Construction
Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) E. SUBDIVISION ACQUISTION & BUILD OUT
Budget
The following estimated budget for home construction is hypothetical based on current market assumptions and subject to iterative design adjustments. It has prepared as a basis for further deliberations.
ESTIMATED COSTS PER SF
Floor Plan Square Footage
Trade Costs Construction
All in Cost per SF
Break Even Cost per SF
ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS
Design & Permitting
Permits and Fees
Trade Costs
Homebuilder Profit Overhead and
Total Construction Costs
Finance Costs (10%)
Total Development Costs
Transaction Costs (6%)
Break Even Sales Price
$1,300.00
$185.00
$251.98
$312.44
$3,500.00
$47,500.00
$240,500.00
$36,075.00
$327,575.00
$32,757.50
$383,249.65
$22,917.15
$406,166.79
$4,500.00
$52,500.00
$280,000.00
$42,000.00
$379,000.00
$37,900.00
$443,414.84
$26,514.84
$469,929.68
1,600.00
175
$236.88
$293.71
$5,500.00
$55,000.00
$297,000.00
$44,550.00
$402,050.00
$40,205.00
$470,382.42
$28,127.42
$498,509.84
1,800.00
165
$223.36
$276.95
Subdivision Acquisiton & Build Out
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 56 Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) E. SUBDIVISON ACQUISITION & BUILD OUT
Subdivision Acquisiton & Build Out
Our team seamlessly intertwines
the threads of effective
marketing, inventive financing
strategies, and a commitment to
sustainability. We work to create
outcomes in which the needs of
our community and fiscal
responsibility meet, cementing
successful project delivery and
transforming ambitious visions
into tangible realities.
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 57 Develop subdivision-level branding that
emphasizes project and community
characteristics to uplift the entire area.
Tailor marketing strategies to appeal to
both affordable and market-rate
homebuyers with an emphasis to avoid
labeling the subject development of
negative connotations related to
affordability restrictions.
Host buyer and community workshops to
foster engagement and feedback.
Collaborate with local real estate agents
and community organizations for effective
outreach.
Navigate the dynamic single-family home
market conditions by adjusting rate of
construction, and order of construction of
site and house plans.
Tailor finance packages for affordable
housing, incorporating private mortgage,
local, and state funding including down
payment assistance programs.
Explore opportunities to leverage equity in
market-rate lots for additional gap
funding.
Strategic Marketing & Sales Plan
Workforce Housing Buyer Finance
Develop a project lending and sales team
that is educated on buyer finance
programs and project regulations. While
buyers will not be required to use the
project lending team it will be paramount
to facilitate buyer reliable buyer resources
for consideration.
Work with the City of Redding to pursue
additional gap funding resources for
affordable buyers to ensure construction
of deed restricted lots.
Collaborate with Redding Electric Utilities
on existing or tailored programs to align
with sustainability goals.
Consider green building certifications and
integrate energy-efficient technologies.
Seek additional grant, tax credit and
rebate programs to fulfill long-term
sustainability commitments for the
benefit of residents and the environment
while contributing to project feasibility.
Sustainability Initiatives
Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) F
section
UniqueAdditions&Benefits
Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 855 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) F.1 | POINTS OF INTEREST
Unique Additions & Benfits
Utilizing hilly terrain
Community parks
chosen for views
Natural play parks
Connective
recreation paths
Lookout areas in
hilltop parks
Picnic areas
Seasonal wetlands &
streams
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 61 Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Unique Additions & Benfits
F.2 | CONNECTIVITY
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 62 Mixture of paved and
natural trails
Neighborhood Electric
Vehicles (N.E.V.’s)
Pedestrian bridges
Community
connectivity Trailhead
bike/scooter/
N.E.V. parking
Neighborhood-scale
roundabouts
Bike roundabouts
Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Unique Additions & Benfits
F.3 | PEDESTRIAN SCALE AMENITIES
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 63 Well-lit trail systems
Separation of vehicle
ways and pedestrian
ways
Safe areas for children
to play
Landscaping to provide
shade along trails
Ample seating areas
Enhanced crosswalks
Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Unique Additions & Benfits
F.4 | A VIBRANT NEIGHBORHOOD
K2 Development Company | City of Redding | Quartz Hill Infrastructure Development | 64 Modern Craftsman style
architecture
Subtle color schemes
Pocket neighborhood
configuration
Front porch living
Block party mentality
Landowner access to
community trails
N.E.V. garages
Interconnected front
yards
Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) E
XHIBITS
Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: K2 Proposal - The Peaks (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5419) October 12, 2023
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF INFRASTRUCTURE
THAT SUPPORTS
A SINGLE-FAMILY HOUSING DEVELOPMENT
(Schedule Number 5419)
In accordance with the provisions of the Municipal Code of the City of Redding, sealed proposals must be submitted to the City Clerk’s 3rd floor office of the City of Redding, located at City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California 96001 prior to 3:00 p.m. PST, Friday, November 10, 2023, for furnishing the City of Redding a proposal for the development of infrastructure that supports a single-family housing development in Redding, per the attached specifications and general conditions.
PROPOSALS RECEIVED AFTER THIS TIME AND DATE MAY NOT BE ACCEPTED OR CONSIDERED.
The said proposals will be opened at 3:00 p.m. PST, on Friday, November 10, 2023, in the designated City Hall Conference Room as posted in the main lobby of City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.
The proposer shall provide the original (unbound) proposal and six (6) original hard copies, along with an exact copy of the proposal in PDF format on a USB “thumb” drive. Fax or electronic submission of proposals will not be allowed. The City will award any resulting contract in a manner consistent with the City Purchasing Ordinance.
The cut-off date and time for receiving questions regarding this RFP is 5:00 p.m.
PST, on Thursday, October 26, 2023. All inquiries must be made in writing and may be submitted to the email address shown below.
THE CITY OF REDDING
Purchasing Division
Michelle Kempley, Purchasing Officer
[email protected]
Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: 5419 - Development of Infrastructure that Supports a Single-Family Housing Development (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals NOTE
If a potential bidder/proposer received this solicitation document through some means other than surface mail from the City of Redding (such as from the City of Redding Internet web site, or from another prospective bidder/proposer), it is the responsibility of the potential bidder/proposer to advise the assigned City of Redding Purchasing contact of its intention to submit a bid/proposal so that any addenda or other correspondence related to this solicitation will be sent to the potential bidder/proposer. When contacting the Purchasing Division, the bidder/proposer shall provide the solicitation number located on the cover page of this document.
Transmittal of this information must be in writing, by U.S. Mail, fax, or e-mail.
Transmittal of this information via telephone is not acceptable.
Please submit bid/proposal as directed in the RFP package. Forward to:
City of Redding
City Clerk
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Proposals must be received by the City Clerk’s office prior to 3:00 p.m. PST on the date indicated below. Mailing envelope is to be clearly marked on the outside with the following notation:
“Proposal for Schedule No. 5419; opening at
3:00 P.M., on Friday, November 10, 2023”
Note: Signatures must be legible, indicating full first and last name.
The City of Redding
Purchasing Division
Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: 5419 - Development of Infrastructure that Supports a Single-Family Housing Development (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Request for Proposals
for the
Development of Infrastructure
that Supports
A Single-Family Housing Development
(RFP Schedule #5419)
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of Redding’s (City) Housing Division is pleased to request proposals from qualified Developers (Developer) for the design, right of way acquisition, state environmental compliance, project management and construction of the infrastructure that supports a single-family housing development of at least 120 single-family homes (Project).
The successful Developer is expected to be awarded December 19, 2023, and the resulting infrastructure project completed by December 1, 2025.
Submitted proposals must include a proposed budget, timeline and a detailed plan to meet Project goals.
Developers responding to the RFP must provide all necessary resources to ensure the Project is planned, constructed and completed within an agreed upon Project delivery schedule between the City and the Developer. Interested Developers are required to submit qualifications in accordance with the requirements of the RFP.
The Redding Housing Division reserves the right to request at any time that Developers submit additional information to Housing Division staff. The Housing Division also reserves the right to suspend, amend or modify the provisions of this RFP, to reject any and all proposals, to negotiate modifications of proposals, or to award less than the available or requested funding.
II. BACKGROUND
In response to the 2018 wildfires, the United States Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD) allocated Community Development Block Grant – Disaster Recovery (CDBG-DR) funds to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to be distributed statewide to disasteraffected areas. Through their Action Plan with HUD, HCD appropriated funding for infrastructure to meet the unmet infrastructure needs of impacted communities. The resulting program was called Disaster Recovery – Infrastructure (DR-INF). The City of Redding was awarded CDBG-DR-INF funds to complete this Project. The Policies and more information about the CDBG-DR-INF program are available on HCD’s website, located at:
www.hcd.ca.gov/grants-and-funding/disaster-recovery-and-mitigation/infrastructure-and-resilientinfrastructure-programs The Project site is approximately 112-acres located at 850 Quartz Hill Drive; APN 115170001000 (Property). See location map attached as Exhibit A.
Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: 5419 - Development of Infrastructure that Supports a Single-Family Housing Development (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals III. SCOPE OF SERVICES
The City is seeking a Developer with the capacity, creativity and commitment to transform the Property located at 850 Quartz Hill Drive into a single-family subdivision under an accelerated timeline. The Developer will provide professional development expertise to ensure that street alignments, storm drainage, sewer and water facilities, location and size of easements and rights-of-way, trees, traffic access, grading, and numerous other features conform to City standards and regulations. The resulting Project should be designed and arranged in the best possible manner to minimize change to the environment while maximizing the number of developable parcels for single-family housing.
The resulting subdivision shall include a minimum of 120 single-family parcels. In addition to the requirements of Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Title 17 (Subdivision Ordinance), the Developer will be expected to coordinate all aspects of design and construction with the Housing Division’s assigned project manager to ensure the Project matches the goals and requirements of the HCD CDBG-DR-INF.
The Scope of Services will include preliminary design (30%, 60%, and 90% plans) services, final design services, permitting and environmental compliance documentation for the subdivision design and buildable improvement plans. The environmental compliance will include all required CEQA documentation. The City will provide a Phase I EAS and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) environmental review. Any required right-of-way acquisition, preparation of bid procurement and contract documents, as well as project management services during the planned development, subdivision infrastructure development and construction periods for the Project will also be required. The end product of the Project will be shovel-ready lots complete with City-infrastructure and a final subdivision map that includes as-built, civil engineering plans completed and approved by City of Redding.
Once the Project is completed, 51% of the finished lots will contain covenants restricting the future homes for sale to income eligible buyers earning at or below 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI) as determined by HUD. It is expected that the remaining lots may be developed and sold at market value.
The successful Developer will be required to utilize private financing to fund the Infrastructure portion of the Project while the City receives reimbursement payments from the State of California Housing and Community Development, which may take up to 90 days for each draw.
If the City is satisfied with the timeliness and the Developer’s performance and completion of the Project resulting from this RFP, the City may negotiate with the selected Developer to provide additional services that may include the disposition of the resulting parcels and further development and build out of the subdivision parcels. The City provided financing is to be used specifically for the infrastructure related costs. Proposals must include a creative plan and budget for the design, project management, construction marketing and sale of the single-family residential structures, including the workforce housing type units set aside for buyers earning at or below 80% of the AMI.
Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: 5419 - Development of Infrastructure that Supports a Single-Family Housing Development (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals IV. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
• Eligible Developer(s) include for-profit or non-profit entities, individuals, general or limited partnerships or limited liability companies;
• Generally, Developer(s) should have completed at least three subdivisions or a complex housing development within the past 10 years. Developer(s) without the necessary experience may enter into a joint venture agreement with other experienced Developers in order to be considered; • Project proposals must have reasonable acquisition, construction and operating costs, as reviewed and determined by Housing staff based on local recent comparable developments; • Developer(s) must demonstrate readiness for the development of the Project within the timelines stipulated;
• Projects must comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Compliance with CEQA and NEPA must be completed prior to construction;
• The successful Developer must comply with all funding source requirements, including but not limited to California prevailing wage requirements and Davis Bacon federal labor standards; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA); Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing Act; Section 3 of the U.S. Housing Act of 1968, Equal Opportunity and related requirements in 24 CFR Section 982.53, as amended; prohibition against eminent domain, Architectural Barriers Act of 1968; federal and state requirements related to Minority Business and Women Business Enterprises (M/WBE), Duplication of Benefits, the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Act, Building Standards (CalGREEN, WUI, Broadband Infrastructure), Article XXXIV, and the National Objective of Demonstrating Benefit to LMI Persons; federal labor standards regulations under 29 CFR Part 5 and other regulations; and state and federal regulations pertaining to remediation of lead, asbestos and other existing hazards;
• The successful Developer will be required to ensure compliance with all labor standard requirements; and
• Project must comply with Housing Division policies; plans and ordinances of the City of Redding; HCD DR-INF Policies and Procedures; state and federal regulations; and other applicable funding source guidelines and regulations. The Developer(s) shall pay any and all required fees to the City of Redding, which may include a compliance monitoring fee, subordination fee, or other applicable fee;
Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: 5419 - Development of Infrastructure that Supports a Single-Family Housing Development (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals V. PROPOSAL FORMAT
At the minimum, the proposal shall include, the following information:
A. Cover/Transmittal Letter – Letter is to be signed, in ink, by a member of the organization having the authority to negotiate and execute contracts on behalf of the firm. Cover letter must acknowledge receipt of any and all addenda by specific number, if any were issued (if in doubt check the website https://www.cityofredding.gov/government/departments/purchasing/bid_opportunities.php).
B. Project Approach and Understanding - This section should outline the Developer’s basic understanding of the Project. It should identify key issues to be addressed during the Project and any insights or innovative ideas the Developer can provide in addressing those issues. Describe the work plan and approach that your team intends to use to complete the tasks listed in the Scope of Services. Note any changes/deviations or additions to the work descriptions that may have been overlooked or that help clarify the work tasks. Additions which demonstrate a clear benefit or advantage to the City may receive special consideration.
C. Responsible personnel, team experience with similar projects, and funding - List the Principal-inCharge, Project Manager, and key project staff who will be directly involved in this project. Include a resume for each key person. Indicate their role on the project and the expected percentage of their work hours committed to it. Include all projects in progress or completed over the last ten (10) years that are comparable in size and scope to this project. Include detailed descriptions/photos/plans. Describe how the project will be planned and controlled. Include in this section a project schedule through the completion of the contract documents together with a tentative schedule for construction.
D. Financial Viability of Developer - Developer shall include a Project construction budget based on the requirements of this RFP. Developer shall provide the status of their organization and a brief financial history. The Developer shall provide a statement regarding any debarments, suspensions, bankruptcy and/or loan defaults.
E. Subdivision acquisition and build out - Provide a creative plan and budget for the design, project management, construction and marketing of the single-family residential structures, including the workforce housing units. The plan should include a proposal for guaranteeing that the affordable units will be constructed as well as the market rate units
F. Unique additions providing additional benefit to the City - Please describe any unique ideas that you have to improve the development of the Property or provide in some way, additional public benefit to the surrounding subdivisions or to the City at large.
Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: 5419 - Development of Infrastructure that Supports a Single-Family Housing Development (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals VI. TENTATIVE TIME SCHEDULE
Release RFP ………………………………………………………………………………….…………………..….…………October 12,2023 Questions due by 5 p.m. …………………...…………….….……………………….....………….………………...October 26, 2023 Addendum Issued (if necessary) ….…………………….……………….………….……………..……….………October 31, 2023 Deadline to Receive Proposal – Before 3 p.m. ………………………….……...….……….………. November 10, 2023 Evaluate Proposals ……………………… ..…..……….………………….………….…………….……………….November 17, 2023 Developer Interviews (if necessary)…………………………………..…………………………………………November 27, 2023 Select Developer……………..……………………………………………….………….…….…..…………………..November 30, 2023 City Council Meeting for Developer Approval…….…………………………...……..….………………. December 19, 2023 Enter into Contract ……..…………………………………………….…………………………………………………...January 30, 2023 Receive Authority to Use Grant Funds (NEPA) ………………………………………….………………………. March 30, 2024 Receive Tentative Subdivision Map Approval……………………………………………………...………………..May 1, 2024 Begin Construction…………………………………………...…………………..………….………………………………….May 15, 2024 Complete Construction….………………………………………………………………………………………………December 1, 2025 VII. PROPOSAL SUBMITTALS
Pages in the proposal shall be typed and double sided with the maximum number of pages of proposal information (excepting cover sheet, table of contents, section tab sheets, blank pages, and index sheets) to be limited to eighty (80) pages, excluding resumes for project key staff. An 8 ½” x 11” sheet typed double sided counts as two pages. Only the specifically requested information shall be submitted.
Promotional or other unsolicited material may not be submitted.
Include a copy of the cover letter with each copy of the proposal. The six copies of the proposal shall be presented in a way that allows for easy of recycling, such as plastic comb or clip fasteners. Do not use wire binding. The Developer shall submit one (1) original unbound proposal, six (6) copies, and one flash drive with a pdf of the proposal to the City Clerk’s Office by the date, time and at the location noted on the cover sheet of this RFP.
Developer(s) understand that under the California Public Records Act, all documents submitted in response to this RFP are considered public records and may be made available to the public upon request (excluding confidential finance information in relation to the Developer). Late submittals, submittals to the wrong location, or submittals with inadequate copies may be considered non-responsive and may be rejected
VIII. CONTACTS
Technical questions regarding this RFP may be submitted in writing to the contact listed below and be received by 5:00 p.m., PST, on Friday, October 26, 2023. At the City’s sole discretion, clarification deemed material to the understanding of this RFP will be distributed as a formal addendum to all known Developer’s receiving the RFP and be posted online at
https://www.cityofredding.gov/government/departments/purchasing/bid_opportunities.php. It is the Developer’s responsibility to be sure they are in receipt of all addenda, should any be released.
Michelle Kempley, Purchasing Officer – [email protected] Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: 5419 - Development of Infrastructure that Supports a Single-Family Housing Development (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals IX. EVALUATION CRITERIA
A Review/Selection Committee will evaluate the Developer based on the proposals and the following items:
Scoring Criteria Max Points
Project Approach and understanding; ability to complete Project on time and within budget
30 Responsible personnel, team experience with similar projects and funding. 25 Financial viability of Developer 20
Subdivision acquisition and build out plan 15
Unique additions providing an additional benefit to the City 10 Total 100
Oral interviews with the top ranked Developers, based on their proposals, may be scheduled to determine which team is best qualified to perform the work for this project. After all interviews are completed, the Committee will make a recommendation to the City Manager. The City Manager may require additional information prior to making the recommendation to the City Council. If the City Council approves staff recommendation, Staff will proceed with the negotiating of the contract and preparation for contract execution.
LIST OF EXHIBITS
EXHBIT A: Location Map
EXHIBIT B: Request for Proposal General Conditions
EXHIBIT C: Insurance Requirements
Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: 5419 - Development of Infrastructure that Supports a Single-Family Housing Development (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals Quartz Hill Rd
Keswick Dam Rd
Wagon Dr
Buena
v
entura
Blv
d
Baker Rd
Old Lantern Dr
Santa Cruz Dr
Spin
n
aker
Dr
Menlo Way
nchell Dr
Sutro Mine Rd
Puffin Way
Coggins
St
Santa Barbara Dr
Balboa
Dr
Cactus Ln
Albio
n
Ave
Sunray Way
Ferrington Ct
Keel Ct
Coggins
T
Americana Way
Landma
Cape Cod Dr
White Water Cir
Waysyde Way
Clarks Ln
Brincard Way
850 QUARTZ HILL RD / City of Redding
Print Date: September 22, 2023
P:\Housing\ProProjects\QuartzHillHousingInfrastructure
0 500 1,000 1,500
Feet
Old Oregon Trl
ÅÄ273
Airport Rd
Lake Blvd
Oasis Rd
ÅÄ44
ÅÄ299
Placer St
Bechelli Ln
Hartnell Ave
Old Alturas Rd
Eureka Way
Clear Creek Rd
Knighton Rd
Quartz Hill Rd
§¨¦5
Canyon Rd
Churn Creek Rd N Market St
S Market St
Dersch Rd
Meadow View Dr
Victor Ave
S BonnyviewRd
ÅÄ299
§¨¦5
§¨¦5
ÅÄ273
Inset Map
850 Quartz Hill Rd (112.9 Ac.)
City Limit
WAPA Easement
20% Slope
Major Creek
Minor Creek
Greenway
Manhole
Wastewater Pipe
Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: 5419 - Development of Infrastructure that Supports a Single-Family Housing Development (9.2(f)--Award Request for Proposals