A proposal for
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF AMERICA BB
Prepared by
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA, INC.
Andy Ruden
Aug 21, 2023
Freightliner 114SD Plus
Components shown may not reflect all spec'd options and are not to scale Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
S P E C I F I C A T I O N P R O P O S A L
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
Price Level
PRL-27D SD PRL-27D (EFF:MY24 ORDERS)
Data Version
DRL-008 SPECPRO21 DATA RELEASE VER 008
Vehicle Configuration
001-177 114SD PLUS CONVENTIONAL CHASSIS 7,934 6,476
004-224 2024 MODEL YEAR SPECIFIED
002-003 SET FORWARD AXLE - TRUCK
019-004 STRAIGHT TRUCK PROVISION, NON-TOWING
003-001 LH PRIMARY STEERING LOCATION
General Service
AA1-002 TRUCK CONFIGURATION
AA6-002 DOMICILED, USA (EXCLUDING CALIFORNIA AND
CARB OPT-IN STATES)
99D-010 NO 2008 CARB EMISSION CERTIFICATION
AF2-998 NONE
A85-010 UTILITY/REPAIR/MAINTENANCE SERVICE
A84-1GM GOVERNMENT BUSINESS SEGMENT
AA4-002 LIQUID BULK COMMODITY
AA5-002 TERRAIN/DUTY: 100% (ALL) OF THE TIME, IN
TRANSIT, IS SPENT ON PAVED ROADS
AB1-008 MAXIMUM 8% EXPECTED GRADE
AB5-001 SMOOTH CONCRETE OR ASPHALT PAVEMENT -
MOST SEVERE IN-TRANSIT (BETWEEN SITES)
ROAD SURFACE
995-1AE FREIGHTLINER LEVEL II WARRANTY
A66-99D EXPECTED FRONT AXLE(S) LOAD : 20000.0 lbs
A68-99D EXPECTED REAR DRIVE AXLE(S) LOAD :
46000.0 lbs
A63-99D EXPECTED GROSS VEHICLE WEIGHT CAPACITY
: 66000.0 lbs
Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
Truck Service
AA3-034 SEWER/INDUSTRIAL VACUUM BODY
AF3-2AA SEWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
Engine
101-3BU CUM L9 370 HP @ 2100 RPM; 2100 GOV RPM,
1250 LB-FT @ 1200 RPM
-850 -70
Electronic Parameters
79A-075 75 MPH ROAD SPEED LIMIT
79B-000 CRUISE CONTROL SPEED LIMIT SAME AS ROAD
SPEED LIMIT
79K-014 PTO MODE ENGINE RPM LIMIT - 1800 RPM
79M-001 PTO MODE BRAKE OVERRIDE - SERVICE
BRAKE APPLIED
79P-002 PTO RPM WITH CRUISE SET SWITCH - 700 RPM
79Q-002 PTO RPM WITH CRUISE RESUME SWITCH - 700
RPM
79S-008 PTO MODE CANCEL VEHICLE SPEED - 25 MPH
79U-007 PTO GOVERNOR RAMP RATE - 250 RPM PER
SECOND
79V-001 FUEL DOSING OF AFTERTREATMENT ENABLED
IN PTO MODE-CLEANS HYDROCARBONS AT
HIGH TEMPERATURES ONLY
79W-003 THREE REMOTE PTO SPEEDS
79X-005 PTO SPEED 1 SETTING - 900 RPM
79Y-009 PTO SPEED 2 SETTING - 1400 RPM
79Z-006 PTO SPEED 3 SETTING - 1700 RPM
80G-002 PTO MINIMUM RPM - 700
80J-001 REGEN INHIBIT SPEED THRESHOLD - 0 MPH
80S-014 PTO 1, NO SWITCH, TEM SUPPLIED REQUEST
AND INTERLOCKS, WITH PTO CONNECTIONS,
STATIONARY INTERLOCKS
80T-014 PTO 2, NO SWITCH, TEM SUPPLIED REQUEST
AND INTERLOCKS, WITH PTO CONNECTIONS,
STATIONARY INTERLOCKS
80V-005 ENGINE MOUNT PTO, TEM SUPPLIED REQUEST,
STATIONARY
Engine Equipment
99C-021 2010 EPA/CARB/GHG21 CONFIGURATION
13E-001 STANDARD OIL PAN
105-001 ENGINE MOUNTED OIL CHECK AND FILL
Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
014-1B5 SIDE OF HOOD AIR INTAKE WITH DONALDSON
HIGH CAPACITY AIR CLEANER WITH SAFETY
ELEMENT, FIREWALL MOUNTED
124-1E1 DR 12V 200 AMP 28-SI QUADRAMOUNT PAD
ALTERNATOR WITH REMOTE BATTERY VOLT
SENSE
292-235 (2) DTNA GENUINE, FLOODED STARTING, MIN
2000CCA, 370RC, THREADED STUD BATTERIES
-50 -10
290-017 BATTERY BOX FRAME MOUNTED
281-001 STANDARD BATTERY JUMPERS
282-001 SINGLE BATTERY BOX FRAME MOUNTED LH
SIDE UNDER CAB
291-017 WIRE GROUND RETURN FOR BATTERY CABLES
WITH ADDITIONAL FRAME GROUND RETURN
289-001 NON-POLISHED BATTERY BOX COVER
293-058 POSITIVE LOAD DISCONNECT WITH CAB
MOUNTED CONTROL SWITCH MOUNTED
OUTBOARD DRIVER SEAT
2 295-029 POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE POSTS FOR
JUMPSTART LOCATED ON FRAME NEXT TO
STARTER
2 306-015 PROGRESSIVE LOW VOLTAGE DISCONNECT AT
12.3 VOLTS FOR DESIGNATED CIRCUITS
107-032 CUMMINS TURBOCHARGED 18.7 CFM AIR
COMPRESSOR WITH INTERNAL SAFETY VALVE
152-041 ELECTRONIC ENGINE INTEGRAL SHUTDOWN
PROTECTION SYSTEM
128-076 CUMMINS ENGINE INTEGRAL BRAKE WITH
VARIABLE GEOMETRY TURBO ON/OFF
20 016-1C2 RH OUTBOARD UNDER STEP MOUNTED
HORIZONTAL AFTERTREATMENT SYSTEM
ASSEMBLY WITH RH B-PILLAR MOUNTED
VERTICAL TAILPIPE
30 25
28F-014 ENGINE AFTERTREATMENT DEVICE,
AUTOMATIC OVER THE ROAD REGENERATION
AND VIRTUAL REGENERATION REQUEST
SWITCH IN CLUSTER
239-026 10 FOOT 06 INCH (126 INCH+0/-5.9 INCH)
EXHAUST SYSTEM HEIGHT
237-1CR RH CURVED VERTICAL TAILPIPE B-PILLAR
MOUNTED ROUTED FROM STEP
23U-002 13 GALLON DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID TANK
30N-003 100 PERCENT DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID FILL
23Y-001 STANDARD DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID PUMP
MOUNTING
Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
43X-002 LH MEDIUM DUTY STANDARD DIESEL EXHAUST
FLUID TANK LOCATION
43Y-001 STANDARD DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID TANK CAP
242-001 STAINLESS STEEL AFTERTREATMENT
DEVICE/MUFFLER/TAILPIPE SHIELD
273-058 AIR POWERED ON/OFF ENGINE FAN CLUTCH
276-001 AUTOMATIC FAN CONTROL WITHOUT DASH
SWITCH, NON ENGINE MOUNTED
110-003 CUMMINS SPIN ON FUEL FILTER
118-008 COMBINATION FULL FLOW/BYPASS OIL FILTER
266-017 1300 SQUARE INCH ALUMINUM RADIATOR -50
103-036 ANTIFREEZE TO -34F, ETHYLENE GLYCOL PRECHARGED SCA HEAVY DUTY COOLANT 171-007 GATES BLUE STRIPE COOLANT HOSES OR
EQUIVALENT
172-001 CONSTANT TENSION HOSE CLAMPS FOR
COOLANT HOSES
270-016 RADIATOR DRAIN VALVE
N 360-013 1350 ADAPTER FLANGE FOR FRONT PTO
PROVISION
20 361-001 FLYWHEEL PTO, STANDARD GEARS, FOR
REMOTE MOUNTED PUMP
50 10
138-011 PHILLIPS-TEMRO 1000 WATT/115 VOLT BLOCK
HEATER
4 140-053 BLACK PLASTIC ENGINE HEATER RECEPTACLE
MOUNTED UNDER LH DOOR
132-004 ELECTRIC GRID AIR INTAKE WARMER
155-055 DELCO 12V 39MT HD/OCP STARTER WITH
THERMAL PROTECTION AND INTEGRATED
MAGNETIC SWITCH
-45
Transmission
342-582 ALLISON 3000 RDS AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION
WITH PTO PROVISION
Transmission Equipment
343-339 ALLISON VOCATIONAL PACKAGE 223 -
AVAILABLE ON 3000/4000 PRODUCT FAMILIES
WITH VOCATIONAL MODELS RDS, HS, MH AND
TRV
84B-012 ALLISON VOCATIONAL RATING FOR ON/OFF
HIGHWAY APPLICATIONS AVAILABLE WITH ALL
PRODUCT FAMILIES
Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
84C-023 PRIMARY MODE GEARS, LOWEST GEAR 1,
START GEAR 1, HIGHEST GEAR 6, AVAILABLE
FOR 3000/4000 PRODUCT FAMILIES ONLY
84D-023 SECONDARY MODE GEARS, LOWEST GEAR 1,
START GEAR 1, HIGHEST GEAR 6, AVAILABLE
FOR 3000/4000 PRODUCT FAMILIES ONLY
84E-017 S5 PERFORMANCE LIMITING PRIMARY SHIFT
SCHEDULE, AVAILABLE FOR 3000/4000
PRODUCT FAMILIES ONLY
84F-018 S7 ECONOMY LIMITING SECONDARY SHIFT
SCHEDULE, AVAILABLE FOR 3000/4000
PRODUCT FAMILIES ONLY
84G-013 2100 RPM PRIMARY MODE SHIFT SPEED
84H-011 1950 RPM SECONDARY MODE SHIFT SPEED
84K-002 2ND GEAR ENGINE BRAKE ALTERNATE
PRESELECT WITH MODERATE DOWNSHIFT
STRATEGY
84N-200 FUEL SENSE 2.0 DISABLED - PERFORMANCE -
TABLE BASED
84U-000 DRIVER SWITCH INPUT - DEFAULT - NO
SWITCHES
84V-001 DIRECTION CHANGE ENABLED WITH
MULTIPLEXED SERVICE BRAKES - ALLISON 5TH
GEN TRANSMISSIONS
353-076 QUICKFIT BODY LIGHTING CONNECTOR AT
END OF FRAME, WITH BLUNTCUTS
34C-011 ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION WIRING TO
CUSTOMER INTERFACE CONNECTOR
362-824 (2) CUSTOMER INSTALLED CHELSEA 280
SERIES PTO'S
363-011 PTO MOUNTING, LH AND RH SIDES OF MAIN
TRANSMISSION
341-018 MAGNETIC PLUGS, ENGINE DRAIN,
TRANSMISSION DRAIN, AXLE(S) FILL AND
DRAIN
345-078 HEAVY DUTY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION
SHIFT CONTROL, COLUMN MOUNTED
97G-004 TRANSMISSION PROGNOSTICS - ENABLED 2013
370-015 WATER TO OIL TRANSMISSION COOLER, IN
RADIATOR END TANK
-15
346-003 TRANSMISSION OIL CHECK AND FILL WITH
ELECTRONIC OIL LEVEL CHECK
35T-001 SYNTHETIC TRANSMISSION FLUID (TES-295
COMPLIANT)
Front Axle and Equipment
Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
400-1AC MFS-20-133A 20,000# FL1 71.0 INCH KPI/3.74
INCH DROP SINGLE FRONT AXLE
260
402-030 MERITOR 16.5X6 Q+ CAST SPIDER CAM FRONT
BRAKES, DOUBLE ANCHOR, FABRICATED
SHOES
10 403-002 NON-ASBESTOS FRONT BRAKE LINING
419-001 CAST IRON OUTBOARD FRONT BRAKE DRUMS
427-001 FRONT BRAKE DUST SHIELDS 5
409-006 FRONT OIL SEALS
408-001 VENTED FRONT HUB CAPS WITH WINDOW,
CENTER AND SIDE PLUGS - OIL
416-022 STANDARD SPINDLE NUTS FOR ALL AXLES
405-002 MERITOR AUTOMATIC FRONT SLACK
ADJUSTERS
406-001 STANDARD KING PIN BUSHINGS
536-055 TRW THP-60 POWER STEERING WITH RCH45
AUXILIARY GEAR
130
539-003 POWER STEERING PUMP
534-003 4 QUART POWER STEERING RESERVOIR
533-001 OIL/AIR POWER STEERING COOLER
40T-002 CURRENT AVAILABLE SYNTHETIC 75W-90
FRONT AXLE LUBE
Front Suspension
620-006 20,000# FLAT LEAF FRONT SUSPENSION 310
619-004 GRAPHITE BRONZE BUSHINGS WITH SEALS -
FRONT SUSPENSION
410-998 NO FRONT SHOCK ABSORBERS -30
Rear Axle and Equipment
420-236 RT-46-164 46,000# R-SERIES 78 INCH WIDE
TRACK TANDEM REAR AXLE
570
421-489 4.89 REAR AXLE RATIO
424-001 IRON REAR AXLE CARRIER WITH STANDARD
AXLE HOUSING
386-073 MXL 17T MERITOR EXTENDED LUBE MAIN
DRIVELINE WITH HALF ROUND YOKES
40 40
388-073 MXL 17T MERITOR EXTENDED LUBE INTERAXLE
DRIVELINE WITH HALF ROUND YOKES
452-006 DRIVER CONTROLLED TRACTION
DIFFERENTIAL - BOTH TANDEM REAR AXLES
30 Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
878-022 (1) INTERAXLE LOCK VALVE, (1) DRIVER
CONTROLLED DIFFERENTIAL LOCK FORWARDREAR AXLE VALVE AND (1) REAR-REAR AXLE VALVE
87A-017 INDICATOR LIGHT FOR EACH INTERAXLE
LOCKOUT SWITCH, DISENGAGE INTERAXLE
LOCK WITH IGNITION OFF
87B-025 INDICATOR LIGHT FOR EACH DIFFERENTIAL
LOCKOUT SWITCH, ENGAGE AT SPEEDS
5PMPH OR LESS, DISENGAGE W/IGN OFF
423-020 MERITOR 16.5X7 Q+ CAST SPIDER CAM REAR
BRAKES, DOUBLE ANCHOR, FABRICATED
SHOES
433-002 NON-ASBESTOS REAR BRAKE LINING
434-003 STANDARD BRAKE CHAMBER LOCATION
451-001 CAST IRON OUTBOARD REAR BRAKE DRUMS
425-002 REAR BRAKE DUST SHIELDS 10
440-006 REAR OIL SEALS
426-075 HALDEX GOLDSEAL LONGSTROKE 2-DRIVE
AXLES SPRING PARKING CHAMBERS
428-031 HALDEX AUTOMATIC REAR SLACK ADJUSTERS
WITH STAINLESS STEEL CLEVIS PINS
41T-002 CURRENT AVAILABLE SYNTHETIC 75W-90 REAR
AXLE LUBE
42T-001 STANDARD REAR AXLE BREATHER(S)
Rear Suspension
622-1CJ HENDRICKSON RT463 @46,000# REAR
SUSPENSION
750
621-015 HENDRICKSON RT/RTE - 6.00" SADDLE
431-001 STANDARD AXLE SEATS IN AXLE CLAMP
GROUP
624-011 52 INCH AXLE SPACING
628-005 STEEL BEAMS AND BRONZE CENTER
BUSHINGS WITH BAR PIN ADJUSTABLE END
CONNECTIONS
623-005 FORE/AFT CONTROL RODS
Brake System
490-121 WABCO 4S/4M ABS WITH TRACTION CONTROL
871-001 REINFORCED NYLON, FABRIC BRAID AND WIRE
BRAID CHASSIS AIR LINES
904-001 FIBER BRAID PARKING BRAKE HOSE
412-001 STANDARD BRAKE SYSTEM VALVES
Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
46D-002 STANDARD AIR SYSTEM PRESSURE
PROTECTION SYSTEM
413-002 STD U.S. FRONT BRAKE VALVE
432-003 RELAY VALVE WITH 5-8 PSI CRACK PRESSURE,
NO REAR PROPORTIONING VALVE
480-009 BW AD-9 BRAKE LINE AIR DRYER WITH HEATER 20
* 479-004 AIR DRYER MOUNTED OUTBOARD ON LH RAIL
AS CLOSE TO FUEL TANK AS POSSIBLE - REFE RENCE NK2385
* 460-040 STEEL AIR BRAKE RESERVOIRS MOUNTED
PERPENDICULAR TO OUTSIDE RAIL
LOCATE JUST AFT OF AIR DRYER. LIKE NK238 5
477-011 PETCOCK DRAIN VALVES ON ALL AIR TANK(S)
Trailer Connections
* 296-010 PRIMARY CONNECTOR/RECEPTACLE WIRED
FOR SEPARATE STOP/TURN, ABS CENTER PIN
POWERED THROUGH IGNITION
296-027: CUSTOMER NEEDS PRE-WIRE FOR STOP/TAIL/TURN EOF Wheelbase & Frame
545-687 6875MM (271 INCH) WHEELBASE
* 546-102 7/16X3-9/16X11-1/8 INCH STEEL FRAME
(11.11MMX282.6MM/0.437X11.13 INCH) 120KSI
510 320
547-001 1/4 INCH (6.35MM) C-CHANNEL INNER FRAME
REINFORCEMENT
240 460
N 552-025 1375MM (54 INCH) REAR FRAME OVERHANG
55W-005 FRAME OVERHANG RANGE: 51 INCH TO 60
INCH
20 -80
549-002 24 INCH INTEGRAL FRONT FRAME EXTENSION 140 -20
AC8-99D CALC'D BACK OF CAB TO REAR SUSP C/L (CA) :
187.21 in
AE8-99D CALCULATED EFFECTIVE BACK OF CAB TO
REAR SUSPENSION C/L (CA) : 184.21 in
AE4-99D CALC'D FRAME LENGTH - OVERALL : 376.46 in
FSS-0LH CALCULATED FRAME SPACE LH SIDE : 82.22 in
FSS-0RH CALCULATED FRAME SPACE RH SIDE : 133.09
in
553-001 SQUARE END OF FRAME
550-001 FRONT CLOSING CROSSMEMBER
559-001 STANDARD WEIGHT ENGINE CROSSMEMBER
562-001 STANDARD MIDSHIP #1 CROSSMEMBER(S)
572-001 STANDARD REARMOST CROSSMEMBER
565-001 STANDARD SUSPENSION CROSSMEMBER
Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
Chassis Equipment
556-997 OMIT FRONT BUMPER, CUSTOMER INSTALLED
SPECIAL BUMPER, DOES NOT COMPLY WITH
FMCSR 393.203
-100
551-007 GRADE 8 THREADED HEX HEADED FRAME
FASTENERS
44Z-002 EXTERIOR HARNESSES WRAPPED IN
ABRASION TAPE
* 606-568 606-568: DRILLING PREP FOR SEWER
EQUIPMENT PER DRAWING 80744-004-X,
REVISION C
605-1AB D15-16004-000 CENTER PUNCH TO MARK
CENTERLINE OF REAR SUSPENSION ON
FRAME WEB
* 607-021 CLEAR FRAME RAIL FROM BOC TO FT RR SUSP
BRKT, LH RAIL INBOARD
LOCATE TORPEDO AIR TANK AS FAR AFT AS POSSIBLE INBOARD AND BELOW LLH RAIL Fuel Tanks
204-157 110 GALLON/416 LITER ALUMINUM FUEL TANK -
LH
20 10
218-006 25 INCH DIAMETER FUEL TANK(S)
215-005 PLAIN ALUMINUM/PAINTED STEEL
FUEL/HYDRAULIC TANK(S) WITH PAINTED
BANDS
212-007 FUEL TANK(S) FORWARD
664-001 PLAIN STEP FINISH
205-001 FUEL TANK CAP(S)
122-1H4 DETROIT FUEL/WATER SEPARATOR WITH
WATER IN FUEL SENSOR AND 12 VOLT
PREHEATER
10 216-020 EQUIFLO INBOARD FUEL SYSTEM
20E-004 AUXILIARY FUEL SUPPLY AND RETURN PORTS
LOCATED ON LH FUEL TANK
202-016 HIGH TEMPERATURE REINFORCED NYLON
FUEL LINE
Tires
093-0TB MICHELIN XZY-3 425/65R22.5 20 PLY RADIAL
FRONT TIRES
196
094-2EU HANKOOK DH06 11R22.5 14 PLY RADIAL REAR
TIRES
128
Hubs
Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
418-060 CONMET PRESET PLUS PREMIUM IRON FRONT
HUBS
450-060 CONMET PRESET PLUS PREMIUM IRON REAR
HUBS
Wheels
502-566 MAXION WHEELS 10035 22.5X12.25 10-HUB
PILOT 4.75 INSET 5-HAND STEEL DISC FRONT
WHEELS
102
505-545 MAXION WHEELS 90260 22.5X8.25 10-HUB PILOT
2-HAND HD STEEL DISC REAR WHEELS
160
496-011 FRONT WHEEL MOUNTING NUTS
497-011 REAR WHEEL MOUNTING NUTS
Cab Exterior
829-1A2 114 INCH BBC FLAT ROOF ALUMINUM
CONVENTIONAL CAB
650-008 AIR CAB MOUNTING
648-002 NONREMOVABLE BUGSCREEN MOUNTED
BEHIND GRILLE
667-001 FRONT FENDERS
754-002 3-1/2 INCH FENDER EXTENSIONS 15
678-001 LH AND RH GRAB HANDLES
645-002 BRIGHT FINISH RADIATOR SHELL/HOOD BEZEL
646-042 STATIONARY BLACK GRILLE WITH BRIGHT
ACCENTS
65X-003 CHROME HOOD MOUNTED AIR INTAKE GRILLE
644-004 FIBERGLASS HOOD
690-002 TUNNEL/FIREWALL LINER
727-1AH SINGLE 14 INCH ROUND POLISHED AIR HORN
ROOF MOUNTED
726-001 SINGLE ELECTRIC HORN
728-001 SINGLE HORN SHIELD
575-001 REAR LICENSE PLATE MOUNT END OF FRAME
312-067 HALOGEN COMPOSITE HEADLAMPS WITH
BRIGHT BEZELS
302-047 LED AERODYNAMIC MARKER LIGHTS
311-003 DAYTIME RUNNING LIGHTS WITH
ROCKER/TOGGLE MOMENTARY INTERRUPTER
SWITCH
294-017 INTEGRAL STOP/TAIL/BACKUP LIGHTS WITH 7
EXTRA FEET OF WIRE MOUNTED AT END OF
FRAME
Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
300-015 STANDARD FRONT TURN SIGNAL LAMPS
744-1BC DUAL WEST COAST BRIGHT FINISH HEATED
MIRRORS WITH LH AND RH REMOTE
797-001 DOOR MOUNTED MIRRORS
796-001 102 INCH EQUIPMENT WIDTH
743-204 LH AND RH 8 INCH BRIGHT FINISH CONVEX
MIRRORS MOUNTED UNDER PRIMARY
MIRRORS
74A-001 RH DOWN VIEW MIRROR
* 712-008 (2) CUSTOM NAMEPLATES SHIPPED LOOSE,
"__________"
SEWER EQUIPMENT
729-001 STANDARD SIDE/REAR REFLECTORS
764-010 COMPOSITE EXTERIOR SUN VISOR 10
768-043 63X14 INCH TINTED REAR WINDOW
661-004 TINTED DOOR GLASS LH AND RH WITH TINTED
OPERATING WING WINDOWS
654-011 RH AND LH ELECTRIC POWERED WINDOWS
663-013 1-PIECE SOLAR GREEN GLASS WINDSHELD
659-007 8 LITER (2 GAL) WINDSHIELD WASHER
RESERVOIR, CAB MOUNTED, WITHOUT FLUID
LEVEL INDICATOR
Cab Interior
055-019 RUGGED TRIM PACKAGE
707-107 GRAY & CARBON VINYL INTERIOR "RUGGED"
70K-020 CARBON WITH PREMIUM GUNMETAL ACCENT
(RUGGED)
706-013 MOLDED PLASTIC DOOR PANEL
708-013 MOLDED PLASTIC DOOR PANEL
772-006 BLACK MATS WITH SINGLE INSULATION
785-023 ASH CUP AND LIGHTER
691-001 FORWARD ROOF MOUNTED CONSOLE
693-019 LH AND RH DOOR STORAGE POCKETS
INTEGRATED INTO MOLDED DOOR PANELS
738-021 DIGITAL ALARM CLOCK IN DRIVER DISPLAY
742-007 (2) CUP HOLDERS LH AND RH DASH
680-029 M2/SD DASH
700-002 HEATER, DEFROSTER AND AIR CONDITIONER
701-008 STANDARD HVAC DUCTING WITH SNOW
SHIELD FOR FRESH AIR INTAKE
Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
703-005 MAIN HVAC CONTROLS WITH RECIRCULATION
SWITCH
170-015 STANDARD HEATER PLUMBING
130-041 VALEO HEAVY DUTY A/C REFRIGERANT
COMPRESSOR
702-002 BINARY CONTROL, R-134A
739-033 STANDARD INSULATION
285-013 SOLID-STATE CIRCUIT PROTECTION AND
FUSES
280-007 12V NEGATIVE GROUND ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
324-1B3 STANDARD LED CAB LIGHTING
787-004 REMOTE KEYLESS ENTRY AND 2
TRANSMITTERS
657-001 DOOR LOCKS AND IGNITION SWITCH KEYED
THE SAME
78G-002 KEY QUANTITY OF 2
655-005 LH AND RH ELECTRIC DOOR LOCKS
756-338 BASIC ISRINGHAUSEN HIGH BACK AIR
SUSPENSION DRIVERS SEAT WTIH
MECHANICAL LUMBAR AND INTEGRATED
CUSHION EXTENSION
30 760-338 BASIC ISRINGHAUSEN HIGH BACK AIR
SUSPENSION PASSENGER SEAT WTIH
MECHANICAL LUMBAR AND INTEGRATED
CUSHION EXTENSION
25 10
759-005 DUAL DRIVER AND PASSENGER SEAT
ARMRESTS
8 711-004 LH AND RH INTEGRAL DOOR PANEL ARMRESTS
758-022 BLACK MORDURA CLOTH DRIVER SEAT COVER
761-023 BLACK MORDURA CLOTH PASSENGER SEAT
COVER
763-101 BLACK SEAT BELTS
532-002 ADJUSTABLE TILT AND TELESCOPING
STEERING COLUMN
540-070 4-SPOKE 18 INCH (450MM) LEATHER WRAPPED
STEERING WHEEL WITH CHROME SWITCH
BEZELS
765-002 DRIVER AND PASSENGER INTERIOR SUN
VISORS
Instruments & Controls
106-002 ELECTRONIC ACCELERATOR CONTROL
732-998 NO INSTRUMENT PANEL-DRIVER
Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
734-022 FULLY CONFIGURABLE CENTER INSTRUMENT
PANELS
87L-001 ENGINE REMOTE INTERFACE WITH PARK
BRAKE INTERLOCK
870-002 BRIGHT ARGENT FINISH GAUGE BEZELS
486-001 LOW AIR PRESSURE INDICATOR LIGHT AND
AUDIBLE ALARM
840-001 DUAL NEEDLE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY AIR
PRESSURE GAUGE
198-003 DASH MOUNTED AIR RESTRICTION INDICATOR
WITH GRADUATIONS
721-001 97 DB BACKUP ALARM 3
149-015 ELECTRONIC CRUISE CONTROL WITH
CONTROLS ON STEERING WHEEL SPOKES
156-007 KEY OPERATED IGNITION SWITCH AND
INTEGRAL START POSITION; 4 POSITION
OFF/RUN/START/ACCESSORY
811-044 PREMIUM INSTRUMENT CLUSTER WITH 5.0
INCH TFT COLOR DISPLAY
81B-003 DIGITAL PANEL LAMP DIMMER SWITCH IN
DRIVER DISPLAY
160-038 HEAVY DUTY ONBOARD DIAGNOSTICS
INTERFACE CONNECTOR LOCATED BELOW LH
DASH
844-001 2 INCH ELECTRIC FUEL GAUGE
148-072 ENGINE REMOTE INTERFACE WITH ONE OR
MORE SET SPEEDS
48H-003 QUICKFIT POWERTRAIN INTERFACE
CONNECTOR UNDER CAB WITH CAPS
856-001 ELECTRICAL ENGINE COOLANT TEMPERATURE
GAUGE
852-002 ELECTRIC ENGINE OIL PRESSURE GAUGE
864-001 2 INCH TRANSMISSION OIL TEMPERATURE
GAUGE
867-004 ELECTRONIC OUTSIDE TEMPERATURE
SENSOR DISPLAY IN DRIVER MESSAGE
CENTER
830-017 ENGINE AND TRIP HOUR METERS INTEGRAL
WITHIN DRIVER DISPLAY
372-123 PTO CONTROLS FOR ENHANCED VEHICLE
ELECTRIC/ELECTRONIC ARCHITECTURE
N 679-998 NO OVERHEAD INSTRUMENT PANEL
1U1-002 TOP OF DASH RAM MOUNT WITHOUT POWER
OR GROUND, FOR CUSTOMER FURNISHED
DEVICE
Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
746-137 AM/FM/WB WORLD TUNER RADIO WITH
BLUETOOTH, USB AND AUXILIARY INPUTS,
J1939
747-001 DASH MOUNTED RADIO
750-002 (2) RADIO SPEAKERS IN CAB
753-001 AM/FM ANTENNA MOUNTED ON FORWARD LH
ROOF
74D-006 STANDARD RADIO WIRING WITH STEERING
WHEEL CONTROLS
810-027 ELECTRONIC MPH SPEEDOMETER WITH
SECONDARY KPH SCALE, WITHOUT
ODOMETER
817-001 STANDARD VEHICLE SPEED SENSOR
812-001 ELECTRONIC 3000 RPM TACHOMETER
813-1C8 DETROIT CONNECT PLATFORM HARDWARE
8D1-303 3 YEARS DAIMLER CONNECTIVITY BASE
PACKAGE (FEATURES VARY BY MODEL)
POWERED BY DETROIT CONNECT
6TS-005 TMC RP1226 ACCESSORY CONNECTOR
LOCATED BEHIND PASSENGER SIDE
REMOVEABLE DASH PANEL
162-002 IGNITION SWITCH CONTROLLED ENGINE STOP
81Y-005 PRE-TRIP INSPECTION FEATURE FOR
EXTERIOR LAMPS ONLY
264-030 (1) OVERHEAD MOUNTED LANYARD CONTROL
FOR DRIVER AIR HORN
836-015 DIGITAL VOLTAGE DISPLAY INTEGRAL WITH
DRIVER DISPLAY
660-008 SINGLE ELECTRIC WINDSHIELD WIPER MOTOR
WITH DELAY
304-030 ROTARY HEADLAMP SWITCH, MARKER
LIGHTS/HEADLIGHTS SWITCH WITH PULL OUT
FOR OPTIONAL FOG/ROAD LAMPS
882-009 ONE VALVE PARKING BRAKE SYSTEM WITH
WARNING INDICATOR
299-020 SELF CANCELING TURN SIGNAL SWITCH WITH
DIMMER, HEADLAMP FLASH,
WASH/WIPE/INTERMITTENT
298-046 INTEGRAL ELECTRONIC TURN SIGNAL
FLASHER WITH 40 AMP (20 AMP PER SIDE)
TRAILER LAMP CAPACITY
Design
065-000 PAINT: ONE SOLID COLOR
Color
Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Data Code
Description
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
980-5F6 CAB COLOR A: L0006EY WHITE ELITE EY
986-020 BLACK, HIGH SOLIDS POLYURETHANE CHASSIS
PAINT
962-972 POWDER WHITE (N0006EA) FRONT
WHEELS/RIMS (PKWHT21, TKWHT21, W, TW)
966-972 POWDER WHITE (N0006EA) REAR
WHEELS/RIMS (PKWHT21, TKWHT21, W, TW)
976-995 SUNVISOR PAINTED SAME AS CAB COLOR A
963-003 STANDARD E COAT/UNDERCOATING
Certification / Compliance
996-001 U.S. FMVSS CERTIFICATION, EXCEPT SALES
CABS AND GLIDER KITS
Secondary Factory Options
* 999-010 CUSTOMER ACCEPTS RESPONSIBILITY FOR
ANY CAB OR CHASSIS MODIFICATION DUE TO
REAR ENGINE PTO (MODULE 361)
INSTALLATION
ALSO 999-065: FRONT AND/OR REAR AXLE WID TH EXCEEDS 2.6M. CUSTOMER ADVISED AND AC
CEPTS RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN PERMIT OR VEHICLE APPLICATION IS EXEMPT FROM VEHI CLE WIDTH REQ.
Sales Programs
NO SALES PROGRAMS HAVE BEEN SELECTED
T O T A L V E H I C L E S U M M A R Y
Weight Summary
Weight
Front
Weight
Rear
Total
Weight
Factory Weight+ 9023 lbs 8822 lbs 17845 lbs
Total Weight+ 9023 lbs 8822 lbs 17845 lbs
(+) Weights shown are estimates only.
If weight is critical, contact Customer Application Engineering.
Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
(***) All cost increases for major components (Engines, Transmissions, Axles, Front and Rear Tires) and government mandated requirements, tariffs, and raw material surcharges will be passed through and added to factory invoices.
Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
D I M E N S I O N S
VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS SUMMARY - DIMENSIONS
Model ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 114SD Wheelbase (545) ..........................................................................................................................6875MM (271 INCH) WHEELBASE Rear Frame Overhang (552).................................................................................... 1375MM (54 INCH) REAR FRAME OVERHANG Fifth Wheel (578)................................................................................................................................................... NO FIFTH WHEEL Mounting Location (577) ............................................................................................................... NO FIFTH WHEEL LOCATION Maximum Forward Position (in)....................................................................................................................................................0 Maximum Rearward Position (in) .................................................................................................................................................0 Amount of Slide Travel (in)...........................................................................................................................................................0 Slide Increment (in)......................................................................................................................................................................0 Desired Slide Position (in).........................................................................................................................................................0.0 Cab Size (829)................................................................................114 INCH BBC FLAT ROOF ALUMINUM CONVENTIONAL CAB Sleeper (682)................................................................................................................................NO SLEEPER BOX/SLEEPERCAB Exhaust System (016) ........RH OUTBOARD UNDER STEP MOUNTED HORIZONTAL AFTERTREATMENT SYSTEM ASSEMBLY
WITH RH B-PILLAR MOUNTED VERTICAL TAILPIPE
TABLE SUMMARY - DIMENSIONS
Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Performance calculations are estimates only. If performance calculations are critical, please contact Customer Application Engineering.
Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
T R U C K W E I G H T
VEHICLE SPECIFICATIONS SUMMARY - TRUCK WEIGHT
Model ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 114SD Cab Size (829)................................................................................114 INCH BBC FLAT ROOF ALUMINUM CONVENTIONAL CAB Expected Front Axle(s) Load (lbs)........................................................................................................................................... 20000.0 Expected Pusher Axle(s) Load (lbs)................................................................................................................................................0.0 Expected Rear Axle(s) Load (lbs) ........................................................................................................................................... 46000.0 Expected Tag Axle(s) Load (lbs).....................................................................................................................................................0.0 Expected GVW (lbs).................................................................................................................................................................. 66000 Expected GCW (lbs).......................................................................................................................................................................0.0 Wheelbase (545) ..........................................................................................................................6875MM (271 INCH) WHEELBASE Pusher / Tag Axle (443)......................................................................................................................... NO PUSHER OR TAG AXLE Front Axle to Back of Cab (in)................................................................................................................................................... 83.464 Cab to Body Clearance (in).............................................................................................................................................................3.0 Front Axle to Body (in).............................................................................................................................................................. 86.464 Truck Configuration (AA3) .....................................................................................................SEWER/INDUSTRIAL VACUUM BODY Body Length (ft)......................................................................................................................................................................11.8 Body Weight (lbs) ............................................................................................................................................................... 1700.0 Body Horiz CG from Body Front (ft) ..........................................................................................................................................5.5 Body Front to Rear Axle(s) CL (ft).........................................................................................................................................15.35 Driver Weight (lbs)......................................................................................................................................................................500.0 Driver Horizontal CG from Front Axle (in).................................................................................................................................. 37.656 Left-Hand Primary Fuel/Hydraulic Tank (204) ............................................... 110 GALLON/416 LITER ALUMINUM FUEL TANK - LH Left Fuel Tank Horizontal CG (in)...................................................................................................................................... 101.153 Right-Hand Primary Fuel/Hydraulic Tank (206).................................................................................................... NO RH FUEL TANK Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Right Fuel Tank Horizontal CG (in) ..............................................................................................................................................0
TABLE SUMMARY - TRUCK WEIGHT
Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Prepared for:
John Wichmann
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO OF
AMERICA BB
1590 DUTCH RD
DIXON, IL 61021
Phone: 815-835-5566
Prepared by:
Andy Ruden
TRUCK COUNTRY OF IOWA,
INC.
3201 HWY 61/151
DUBUQUE, IA 520039695
Phone: 563-556-3773
Application Version 11.8.106
Data Version PRL-27D.008
WO-9629_Clayton County_8-9-23
08/21/2023 4:15 PM
Performance calculations are estimates only. If performance calculations are critical, please contact Customer Application Engineering.
Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: ^Proposal (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 1
Solicitation Number: RFP #101221
CONTRACT
This Contract is between Sourcewell, 202 12th Street Northeast, P.O. Box 219, Staples, MN 56479 (Sourcewell) and Sewer Equipment Co. of America, 1590 Dutch Rd., Dixon, IL 61021 (Supplier).
Sourcewell is a State of Minnesota local government unit and service cooperative created under the laws of the State of Minnesota (Minnesota Statutes Section 123A.21) that offers cooperative procurement solutions to government entities. Participation is open to eligible federal, state/province, and municipal governmental entities, higher education, K-12 education, nonprofit, tribal government, and other public entities located in the United States and Canada.
Sourcewell issued a public solicitation for Sewer Vacuum, Hydro-Excavation, and Municipal Pumping Equipment with Related Accessories and Supplies from which Supplier was awarded a contract.
Supplier desires to contract with Sourcewell to provide equipment, products, or services to Sourcewell and the entities that access Sourcewell’s cooperative purchasing contracts (Participating Entities).
1. TERM OF CONTRACT
A. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Contract is effective upon the date of the final signature below.
B. EXPIRATION DATE AND EXTENSION. This Contract expires November 29, 2025, unless it is cancelled sooner pursuant to Article 22. This Contract may be extended one additional year upon the request of Sourcewell and written agreement by Supplier.
C. SURVIVAL OF TERMS. Notwithstanding any expiration or termination of this Contract, all payment obligations incurred prior to expiration or termination will survive, as will the following: Articles 11 through 14 survive the expiration or cancellation of this Contract. All rights will cease upon expiration or termination of this Contract.
2. EQUIPMENT, PRODUCTS, OR SERVICES
A. EQUIPMENT, PRODUCTS, OR SERVICES. Supplier will provide the Equipment, Products, or Services as stated in its Proposal submitted under the Solicitation Number listed above.
Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 2
Supplier’s Equipment, Products, or Services Proposal (Proposal) is attached and incorporated into this Contract.
All Equipment and Products provided under this Contract must be new and the current model.
Supplier may offer close-out or refurbished Equipment or Products if they are clearly indicated in Supplier’s product and pricing list. Unless agreed to by the Participating Entities in advance, Equipment or Products must be delivered as operational to the Participating Entity’s site.
This Contract offers an indefinite quantity of sales, and while substantial volume is anticipated, sales and sales volume are not guaranteed.
B. WARRANTY. Supplier warrants that all Equipment, Products, and Services furnished are free from liens and encumbrances, and are free from defects in design, materials, and workmanship.
In addition, Supplier warrants the Equipment, Products, and Services are suitable for and will perform in accordance with the ordinary use for which they are intended. Supplier’s dealers and distributors must agree to assist the Participating Entity in reaching a resolution in any dispute over warranty terms with the manufacturer. Any manufacturer’s warranty that extends beyond the expiration of the Supplier’s warranty will be passed on to the Participating Entity.
C. DEALERS, DISTRIBUTORS, AND/OR RESELLERS. Upon Contract execution and throughout the Contract term, Supplier must provide to Sourcewell a current means to validate or authenticate Supplier’s authorized dealers, distributors, or resellers relative to the Equipment, Products, and Services offered under this Contract, which will be incorporated into this Contract by reference. It is the Supplier’s responsibility to ensure Sourcewell receives the most current information.
3. PRICING
All Equipment, Products, or Services under this Contract will be priced at or below the price stated in Supplier’s Proposal.
When providing pricing quotes to Participating Entities, all pricing quoted must reflect a Participating Entity’s total cost of acquisition. This means that the quoted cost is for delivered Equipment, Products, and Services that are operational for their intended purpose, and includes all costs to the Participating Entity’s requested delivery location.
Regardless of the payment method chosen by the Participating Entity, the total cost associated with any purchase option of the Equipment, Products, or Services must always be disclosed in the pricing quote to the applicable Participating Entity at the time of purchase.
A. SHIPPING AND SHIPPING COSTS. All delivered Equipment and Products must be properly packaged. Damaged Equipment and Products may be rejected. If the damage is not readily apparent at the time of delivery, Supplier must permit the Equipment and Products to be
Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 3
returned within a reasonable time at no cost to Sourcewell or its Participating Entities.
Participating Entities reserve the right to inspect the Equipment and Products at a reasonable time after delivery where circumstances or conditions prevent effective inspection of the Equipment and Products at the time of delivery. In the event of the delivery of nonconforming Equipment and Products, the Participating Entity will notify the Supplier as soon as possible and the Supplier will replace nonconforming Equipment and Products with conforming Equipment and Products that are acceptable to the Participating Entity.
Supplier must arrange for and pay for the return shipment on Equipment and Products that arrive in a defective or inoperable condition.
Sourcewell may declare the Supplier in breach of this Contract if the Supplier intentionally delivers substandard or inferior Equipment or Products.
B. SALES TAX. Each Participating Entity is responsible for supplying the Supplier with valid taxexemption certification(s). When ordering, a Participating Entity must indicate if it is a taxexempt entity.
C. HOT LIST PRICING. At any time during this Contract, Supplier may offer a specific selection of Equipment, Products, or Services at discounts greater than those listed in the Contract.
When Supplier determines it will offer Hot List Pricing, it must be submitted electronically to Sourcewell in a line-item format. Equipment, Products, or Services may be added or removed from the Hot List at any time through a Sourcewell Price and Product Change Form as defined in Article 4 below.
Hot List program and pricing may also be used to discount and liquidate close-out and discontinued Equipment and Products as long as those close-out and discontinued items are clearly identified as such. Current ordering process and administrative fees apply. Hot List Pricing must be published and made available to all Participating Entities.
4. PRODUCT AND PRICING CHANGE REQUESTS
Supplier may request Equipment, Product, or Service changes, additions, or deletions at any time. All requests must be made in writing by submitting a signed Sourcewell Price and Product Change Request Form to the assigned Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator. This approved form is available from the assigned Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator.
At a minimum, the request must:
x Identify the applicable Sourcewell contract number;
x Clearly specify the requested change;
x Provide sufficient detail to justify the requested change;
Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 4
x Individually list all Equipment, Products, or Services affected by the requested change, along with the requested change (e.g., addition, deletion, price change); and x Include a complete restatement of pricing documentation in Microsoft Excel with the effective date of the modified pricing, or product addition or deletion. The new pricing restatement must include all Equipment, Products, and Services offered, even for those items where pricing remains unchanged.
A fully executed Sourcewell Price and Product Change Request Form will become an amendment to this Contract and will be incorporated by reference.
5. PARTICIPATION, CONTRACT ACCESS, AND PARTICIPATING ENTITY REQUIREMENTS
A. PARTICIPATION. Sourcewell’s cooperative contracts are available and open to public and nonprofit entities across the United States and Canada; such as federal, state/province, municipal, K-12 and higher education, tribal government, and other public entities.
The benefits of this Contract should be available to all Participating Entities that can legally access the Equipment, Products, or Services under this Contract. A Participating Entity’s authority to access this Contract is determined through its cooperative purchasing, interlocal, or joint powers laws. Any entity accessing benefits of this Contract will be considered a Service Member of Sourcewell during such time of access. Supplier understands that a Participating Entity’s use of this Contract is at the Participating Entity’s sole convenience and Participating Entities reserve the right to obtain like Equipment, Products, or Services from any other source.
Supplier is responsible for familiarizing its sales and service forces with Sourcewell contract use eligibility requirements and documentation and will encourage potential participating entities to join Sourcewell. Sourcewell reserves the right to add and remove Participating Entities to its roster during the term of this Contract.
B. PUBLIC FACILITIES. Supplier’s employees may be required to perform work at governmentowned facilities, including schools. Supplier’s employees and agents must conduct themselves in a professional manner while on the premises, and in accordance with Participating Entity policies and procedures, and all applicable laws.
6. PARTICIPATING ENTITY USE AND PURCHASING
A. ORDERS AND PAYMENT. To access the contracted Equipment, Products, or Services under this Contract, a Participating Entity must clearly indicate to Supplier that it intends to access this Contract; however, order flow and procedure will be developed jointly between Sourcewell and Supplier. Typically, a Participating Entity will issue an order directly to Supplier or its authorized subsidiary, distributor, dealer, or reseller. If a Participating Entity issues a purchase order, it may use its own forms, but the purchase order should clearly note the applicable Sourcewell
Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 5
contract number. All Participating Entity orders under this Contract must be issued prior to expiration or cancellation of this Contract; however, Supplier performance, Participating Entity payment obligations, and any applicable warranty periods or other Supplier or Participating Entity obligations may extend beyond the term of this Contract.
Supplier’s acceptable forms of payment are included in its attached Proposal. Participating Entities will be solely responsible for payment and Sourcewell will have no liability for any unpaid invoice of any Participating Entity.
B. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS/PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM. Additional terms and conditions to a purchase order, or other required transaction documentation, may be negotiated between a Participating Entity and Supplier, such as job or industry-specific requirements, legal requirements (e.g., affirmative action or immigration status requirements), or specific local policy requirements. Some Participating Entities may require the use of a Participating Addendum; the terms of which will be negotiated directly between the Participating Entity and the Supplier. Any negotiated additional terms and conditions must never be less favorable to the Participating Entity than what is contained in this Contract.
C. SPECIALIZED SERVICE REQUIREMENTS. In the event that the Participating Entity requires service or specialized performance requirements not addressed in this Contract (such as ecommerce specifications, specialized delivery requirements, or other specifications and requirements), the Participating Entity and the Supplier may enter into a separate, standalone agreement, apart from this Contract. Sourcewell, including its agents and employees, will not be made a party to a claim for breach of such agreement.
D. TERMINATION OF ORDERS. Participating Entities may terminate an order, in whole or in part, immediately upon notice to Supplier in the event of any of the following events:
1. The Participating Entity fails to receive funding or appropriation from its governing body at levels sufficient to pay for the equipment, products, or services to be purchased; or
2. Federal, state, or provincial laws or regulations prohibit the purchase or change the Participating Entity’s requirements.
E. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. The governing law and venue for any action related to a Participating Entity’s order will be determined by the Participating Entity making the purchase.
7. CUSTOMER SERVICE
A. PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE. Supplier will assign an Account Representative to Sourcewell for this Contract and must provide prompt notice to Sourcewell if that person is changed. The Account Representative will be responsible for:
Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 6
x Maintenance and management of this Contract;
x Timely response to all Sourcewell and Participating Entity inquiries; and x Business reviews to Sourcewell and Participating Entities, if applicable.
B. BUSINESS REVIEWS. Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.
8. REPORT ON CONTRACT SALES ACTIVITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FEE PAYMENT A. CONTRACT SALES ACTIVITY REPORT. Each calendar quarter, Supplier must provide a contract sales activity report (Report) to the Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator assigned to this Contract. Reports are due no later than 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter. A Report must be provided regardless of the number or amount of sales during that quarter (i.e., if there are no sales, Supplier must submit a report indicating no sales were made).
The Report must contain the following fields:
x Participating Entity Name (e.g., City of Staples Highway Department); x Participating Entity Physical Street Address;
x Participating Entity City;
x Participating Entity State/Province;
x Participating Entity Zip/Postal Code;
x Participating Entity Contact Name;
x Participating Entity Contact Email Address;
x Participating Entity Contact Telephone Number;
x Sourcewell Assigned Entity/Participating Entity Number; x Item Purchased Description;
x Item Purchased Price;
x Sourcewell Administrative Fee Applied; and
x Date Purchase was invoiced/sale was recognized as revenue by Supplier.
B. ADMINISTRATIVE FEE. In consideration for the support and services provided by Sourcewell, the Supplier will pay an administrative fee to Sourcewell on all Equipment, Products, and Services provided to Participating Entities. The Administrative Fee must be included in, and not added to, the pricing. Supplier may not charge Participating Entities more than the contracted price to offset the Administrative Fee.
The Supplier will submit payment to Sourcewell for the percentage of administrative fee stated in the Proposal multiplied by the total sales of all Equipment, Products, and Services purchased
Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 7
by Participating Entities under this Contract during each calendar quarter. Payments should note the Supplier’s name and Sourcewell-assigned contract number in the memo; and must be mailed to the address above “Attn: Accounts Receivable” or remitted electronically to Sourcewell’s banking institution per Sourcewell’s Finance department instructions. Payments must be received no later than 45 calendar days after the end of each calendar quarter.
Supplier agrees to cooperate with Sourcewell in auditing transactions under this Contract to ensure that the administrative fee is paid on all items purchased under this Contract.
In the event the Supplier is delinquent in any undisputed administrative fees, Sourcewell reserves the right to cancel this Contract and reject any proposal submitted by the Supplier in any subsequent solicitation. In the event this Contract is cancelled by either party prior to the Contract’s expiration date, the administrative fee payment will be due no more than 30 days from the cancellation date.
9. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Sourcewell's Authorized Representative is its Chief Procurement Officer.
Supplier’s Authorized Representative is the person named in the Supplier’s Proposal. If Supplier’s Authorized Representative changes at any time during this Contract, Supplier must promptly notify Sourcewell in writing.
10. AUDIT, ASSIGNMENT, AMENDMENTS, WAIVER, AND CONTRACT COMPLETE A. AUDIT. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 5, the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by Sourcewell or the Minnesota State Auditor for a minimum of six years from the end of this Contract. This clause extends to Participating Entities as it relates to business conducted by that Participating Entity under this Contract.
B. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party may assign or otherwise transfer its rights or obligations under this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party and a fully executed assignment agreement. Such consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Any prohibited assignment will be invalid.
C. AMENDMENTS. Any amendment to this Contract must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been duly executed by the parties.
D. WAIVER. Failure by either party to take action or assert any right under this Contract will not be deemed a waiver of such right in the event of the continuation or repetition of the circumstances giving rise to such right. Any such waiver must be in writing and signed by the parties.
Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 8
E. CONTRACT COMPLETE. This Contract represents the complete agreement between the parties. No other understanding regarding this Contract, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party.For any conflict between the attached Proposal and the terms set out in Articles 1-22 of this Contract, the terms of Articles 1-22 will govern.
F. RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES. The relationship of the parties is one of independent contractors, each free to exercise judgment and discretion with regard to the conduct of their respective businesses. This Contract does not create a partnership, joint venture, or any other relationship such as master-servant, or principal-agent.
11. INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS
Supplier must indemnify, defend, save, and hold Sourcewell and its Participating Entities, including their agents and employees, harmless from any claims or causes of action, including attorneys’ fees incurred by Sourcewell or its Participating Entities, arising out of any act or omission in the performance of this Contract by the Supplier or its agents or employees; this indemnification includes injury or death to person(s) or property alleged to have been caused by some defect in the Equipment, Products, or Services under this Contract to the extent the Equipment, Product, or Service has been used according to its specifications. Sourcewell’s responsibility will be governed by the State of Minnesota’s Tort Liability Act (Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466) and other applicable law.
12. GOVERNMENT DATA PRACTICES
Supplier and Sourcewell must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 13, as it applies to all data provided by or provided to Sourcewell under this Contract and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Supplier under this Contract.
13. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, PUBLICITY, MARKETING, AND ENDORSEMENT A. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
1. Grant of License. During the term of this Contract:
a. Sourcewell grants to Supplier a royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive right and license to use thetrademark(s) provided to Supplier by Sourcewell in advertising and promotional materials for the purpose of marketing Sourcewell’s relationship with Supplier.
b. Supplier grants to Sourcewell a royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive right and license to use Supplier’s trademarks in advertising and promotional materials for the purpose of marketing Supplier’s relationship with Sourcewell.
2. Limited Right of Sublicense. The right and license granted herein includes a limited right of each party to grant sublicenses to their respective subsidiaries, distributors, dealers,
Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 9
resellers, marketing representatives, and agents (collectively “Permitted Sublicensees”) in advertising and promotional materials for the purpose of marketing the Parties’ relationship to Participating Entities. Any sublicense granted will be subject to the terms and conditions of this Article. Each party will be responsible for any breach of this Article by any of their respective sublicensees.
3. Use; Quality Control.
a. Neither party may alter the other party’s trademarks from the form provided and must comply with removal requests as to specific uses of its trademarks or logos.
b. Each party agrees to use, and to cause its Permitted Sublicensees to use, the other party’s trademarks only in good faith and in a dignified manner consistent with such party’s use of the trademarks. Upon written notice to the breaching party, the breaching party has 30 days of the date of the written notice to cure the breach or the license will be terminated.
4. As applicable, Supplier agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Sourcewell and its Participating Entities against any and all suits, claims, judgments, and costs instituted or recovered against Sourcewell or Participating Entities by any person on account of the use of any Equipment or Products by Sourcewell or its Participating Entities supplied by Supplier in violation of applicable patent or copyright laws.
5. Termination. Upon the termination of this Contract for any reason, each party, including Permitted Sublicensees, will have 30 days to remove all Trademarks from signage, websites, and the like bearing the other party’s name or logo (excepting Sourcewell’s pre-printed catalog of suppliers which may be used until the next printing). Supplier must return all marketing and promotional materials, including signage, provided by Sourcewell, or dispose of it according to Sourcewell’s written directions.
B. PUBLICITY. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this Contract must not be released without prior written approval from the Authorized Representatives. Publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Supplier individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from this Contract.
C. MARKETING. Any direct advertising, marketing, or offers with Participating Entities must be approved by Sourcewell. Send all approval requests to the Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator assigned to this Contract.
D. ENDORSEMENT. The Supplier must not claim that Sourcewell endorses its Equipment, Products, or Services.
Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 10
14. GOVERNING LAW, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE
The substantive and procedural laws of the State of Minnesota will govern this Contract. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this Contract, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state court in Todd County, Minnesota or federal court in Fergus Falls, Minnesota.
15. FORCE MAJEURE
Neither party to this Contract will be held responsible for delay or default caused by acts of God or other conditions that are beyond that party’s reasonable control. A party defaulting under this provision must provide the other party prompt written notice of the default.
16. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Contract is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to be illegal, unenforceable, or void then both parties will be relieved from all obligations arising from that provision. If the remainder of this Contract is capable of being performed, it will not be affected by such determination or finding and must be fully performed.
17. PERFORMANCE, DEFAULT, AND REMEDIES
A. PERFORMANCE. During the term of this Contract, the parties will monitor performance and address unresolved contract issues as follows:
1. Notification. The parties must promptly notify each other of any known dispute and work in good faith to resolve such dispute within a reasonable period of time. If necessary, Sourcewell and the Supplier will jointly develop a short briefing document that describes the issue(s), relevant impact, and positions of both parties.
2. Escalation. If parties are unable to resolve the issue in a timely manner, as specified above, either Sourcewell or Supplier may escalate the resolution of the issue to a higher level of management. The Supplier will have 30 calendar days to cure an outstanding issue.
3. Performance while Dispute is Pending. Notwithstanding the existence of a dispute, the Supplier must continue without delay to carry out all of its responsibilities under the Contract that are not affected by the dispute. If the Supplier fails to continue without delay to perform its responsibilities under the Contract, in the accomplishment of all undisputed work, the Supplier will bear any additional costs incurred by Sourcewell and/or its Participating Entities as a result of such failure to proceed.
B. DEFAULT AND REMEDIES. Either of the following constitutes cause to declare this Contract, or any Participating Entity order under this Contract, in default:
1. Nonperformance of contractual requirements, or
2. A material breach of any term or condition of this Contract.
Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 11
The party claiming default must provide written notice of the default, with 30 calendar days to cure the default. Time allowed for cure will not diminish or eliminate any liability for liquidated or other damages. If the default remains after the opportunity for cure, the non-defaulting party may:
x Exercise any remedy provided by law or equity, or
x Terminate the Contract or any portion thereof, including any orders issued against the Contract.
18. INSURANCE
A. REQUIREMENTS. At its own expense, Supplier must maintain insurance policy(ies) in effect at all times during the performance of this Contract with insurance company(ies) licensed or authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota having an “AM BEST” rating of A- or better, with coverage and limits of insurance not less than the following:
1. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability.
Workers’ Compensation: As required by any applicable law or regulation.
Employer's Liability Insurance: must be provided in amounts not less than listed below:
Minimum limits:
$500,000 each accident for bodily injury by accident
$500,000 policy limit for bodily injury by disease
$500,000 each employee for bodily injury by disease
2. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Supplier will maintain insurance covering its operations, with coverage on an occurrence basis, and must be subject to terms no less broad than the Insurance Services Office (“ISO”) Commercial General Liability Form CG0001 (2001 or newer edition), or equivalent. At a minimum, coverage must include liability arising from premises, operations, bodily injury and property damage, independent contractors, products-completed operations including construction defect, contractual liability, blanket contractual liability, and personal injury and advertising injury. All required limits, terms and conditions of coverage must be maintained during the term of this Contract.
Minimum Limits:
$1,000,000 each occurrence Bodily Injury and Property Damage $1,000,000 Personal and Advertising Injury
$2,000,000 aggregate for Products-Completed operations
$2,000,000 general aggregate
3. Commercial Automobile Liability Insurance. During the term of this Contract, Supplier will maintain insurance covering all owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles in limits of liability not less than indicated below. The coverage must be subject to terms
Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 12
no less broad than ISO Business Auto Coverage Form CA 0001 (2010 edition or newer), or equivalent.
Minimum Limits:
$1,000,000 each accident, combined single limit
4. Umbrella Insurance. During the term of this Contract, Supplier will maintain umbrella coverage over Employer’s Liability, Commercial General Liability, and Commercial Automobile.
Minimum Limits:
$2,000,000
5. Network Security and Privacy Liability Insurance. During the term of this Contract, Supplier will maintain coverage for network security and privacy liability. The coverage may be endorsed on another form of liability coverage or written on a standalone policy. The insurance must cover claims which may arise from failure of Supplier’s security resulting in, but not limited to, computer attacks, unauthorized access, disclosure of not public data – including but not limited to, confidential or private information, transmission of a computer virus, or denial of service.
Minimum limits:
$2,000,000 per occurrence
$2,000,000 annual aggregate
Failure of Supplier to maintain the required insurance will constitute a material breach entitling Sourcewell to immediately terminate this Contract for default.
B. CERTIFICATES OF INSURANCE. Prior to commencing under this Contract, Supplier must furnish to Sourcewell a certificate of insurance, as evidence of the insurance required under this Contract. Prior to expiration of the policy(ies), renewal certificates must be mailed to Sourcewell, 202 12th Street Northeast, P.O. Box 219, Staples, MN 56479 or sent to the Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator assigned to this Contract. The certificates must be signed by a person authorized by the insurer(s) to bind coverage on their behalf.
Failure to request certificates of insurance by Sourcewell, or failure of Supplier to provide certificates of insurance, in no way limits or relieves Supplier of its duties and responsibilities in this Contract.
C. ADDITIONAL INSURED ENDORSEMENT AND PRIMARY AND NON-CONTRIBUTORY INSURANCE CLAUSE. Supplier agrees to list Sourcewell and its Participating Entities, including their officers, agents, and employees, as an additional insured under the Supplier’s commercial general liability insurance policy with respect to liability arising out of activities, “operations,” or “work” performed by or on behalf of Supplier, and products and completed operations of Supplier. The policy provision(s) or endorsement(s) must further provide that coverage is
Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 13
primary and not excess over or contributory with any other valid, applicable, and collectible insurance or self-insurance in force for the additional insureds.
D. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION. Supplier waives and must require (by endorsement or otherwise) all its insurers to waive subrogation rights against Sourcewell and other additional insureds for losses paid under the insurance policies required by this Contract or other insurance applicable to the Supplier or its subcontractors. The waiver must apply to all deductibles and/or self-insured retentions applicable to the required or any other insurance maintained by the Supplier or its subcontractors. Where permitted by law, Supplier must require similar written express waivers of subrogation and insurance clauses from each of its subcontractors.
E. UMBRELLA/EXCESS LIABILITY/SELF-INSURED RETENTION. The limits required by this Contract can be met by either providing a primary policy or in combination with umbrella/excess liability policy(ies), or self-insured retention.
19. COMPLIANCE
A. LAWS AND REGULATIONS. All Equipment, Products, or Services provided under this Contract must comply fully with applicable federal laws and regulations, and with the laws in the states and provinces in which the Equipment, Products, or Services are sold.
B. LICENSES. Supplier must maintain a valid and current status on all required federal, state/provincial, and local licenses, bonds, and permits required for the operation of the business that the Supplier conducts with Sourcewell and Participating Entities.
20. BANKRUPTCY, DEBARMENT, OR SUSPENSION CERTIFICATION
Supplier certifies and warrants that it is not in bankruptcy or that it has previously disclosed in writing certain information to Sourcewell related to bankruptcy actions. If at any time during this Contract Supplier declares bankruptcy, Supplier must immediately notify Sourcewell in writing.
Supplier certifies and warrants that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from programs operated by the State of Minnesota; the United States federal government or the Canadian government, as applicable; or any Participating Entity. Supplier certifies and warrants that neither it nor its principals have been convicted of a criminal offense related to the subject matter of this Contract. Supplier further warrants that it will provide immediate written notice to Sourcewell if this certification changes at any time.
Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 14
21. PROVISIONS FOR NON-UNITED STATES FEDERAL ENTITY PROCUREMENTS UNDER
UNITED STATES FEDERAL AWARDS OR OTHER AWARDS
Participating Entities that use United States federal grant or FEMA funds to purchase goods or services from this Contract may be subject to additional requirements including the procurement standards of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 2 C.F.R. § 200. Participating Entities may have additional requirements based on specific funding source terms or conditions. Within this Article, all references to “federal” should be interpreted to mean the United States federal government.
The following list only applies when a Participating Entity accesses Supplier’s Equipment, Products, or Services with United States federal funds.
A. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY. Except as otherwise provided under 41 C.F.R. § 60, all contracts that meet the definition of “federally assisted construction contract” in 41 C.F.R. § 60-
1.3 must include the equal opportunity clause provided under 41 C.F.R. §60-1.4(b), in accordance with Executive Order 11246, “Equal Employment Opportunity” (30 FR 12319, 12935, 3 C.F.R. §, 1964-1965 Comp., p. 339), as amended by Executive Order 11375, “Amending Executive Order 11246 Relating to Equal Employment Opportunity,” and implementing regulations at 41 C.F.R. § 60, “Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor.” The equal opportunity clause is incorporated herein by reference.
B. DAVIS-BACON ACT, AS AMENDED (40 U.S.C. § 3141-3148). When required by federal program legislation, all prime construction contracts in excess of $2,000 awarded by nonfederal entities must include a provision for compliance with the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. § 3141-3144, and 3146-3148) as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 C.F.R. § 5, “Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction”). In accordance with the statute, contractors must be required to pay wages to laborers and mechanics at a rate not less than the prevailing wages specified in a wage determination made by the Secretary of Labor. In addition, contractors must be required to pay wages not less than once a week. The non-federal entity must place a copy of the current prevailing wage determination issued by the Department of Labor in each solicitation. The decision to award a contract or subcontract must be conditioned upon the acceptance of the wage determination. The non-federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the federal awarding agency. The contracts must also include a provision for compliance with the Copeland “Anti-Kickback” Act (40 U.S.C. § 3145), as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 C.F.R. § 3, “Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States”). The Act provides that each contractor or subrecipient must be prohibited from inducing, by any means, any person employed in the construction, completion, or repair of public work, to give up any part of the compensation to which he or she is otherwise entitled. The non-federal entity must report all suspected or reported violations to the federal awarding agency. Supplier must be in compliance with all applicable Davis-Bacon Act provisions.
Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 15
C. CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS ACT (40 U.S.C. § 3701-3708). Where applicable, all contracts awarded by the non-federal entity in excess of $100,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers must include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. §§ 3702 and 3704, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 C.F.R. § 5).
Under 40 U.S.C. § 3702 of the Act, each contractor must be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard work week of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard work week is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in the work week. The requirements of 40 U.S.C. § 3704 are applicable to construction work and provide that no laborer or mechanic must be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence. This provision is hereby incorporated by reference into this Contract. Supplier certifies that during the term of an award for all contracts by Sourcewell resulting from this procurement process, Supplier must comply with applicable requirements as referenced above.
D. RIGHTS TO INVENTIONS MADE UNDER A CONTRACT OR AGREEMENT. If the federal award meets the definition of “funding agreement” under 37 C.F.R. § 401.2(a) and the recipient or subrecipient wishes to enter into a contract with a small business firm or nonprofit organization regarding the substitution of parties, assignment or performance of experimental, developmental, or research work under that “funding agreement,” the recipient or subrecipient must comply with the requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 401, “Rights to Inventions Made by Nonprofit Organizations and Small Business Firms Under Government Grants, Contracts and Cooperative Agreements,” and any implementing regulations issued by the awarding agency. Supplier certifies that during the term of an award for all contracts by Sourcewell resulting from this procurement process, Supplier must comply with applicable requirements as referenced above.
E. CLEAN AIR ACT (42 U.S.C. § 7401-7671Q.) AND THE FEDERAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ACT (33 U.S.C. § 1251-1387). Contracts and subgrants of amounts in excess of $150,000 require the non-federal award to agree to comply with all applicable standards, orders or regulations issued pursuant to the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. § 7401- 7671q) and the Federal Water Pollution Control Act as amended (33 U.S.C. § 1251- 1387). Violations must be reported to the Federal awarding agency and the Regional Office of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Supplier certifies that during the term of this Contract will comply with applicable requirements as referenced above.
F. DEBARMENT AND SUSPENSION (EXECUTIVE ORDERS 12549 AND 12689). A contract award (see 2 C.F.R. § 180.220) must not be made to parties listed on the government wide exclusions in the System for Award Management (SAM), in accordance with the OMB guidelines at 2 C.F.R. §180 that implement Executive Orders 12549 (3 C.F.R. § 1986 Comp., p. 189) and 12689 (3 C.F.R. § 1989 Comp., p. 235), “Debarment and Suspension.” SAM Exclusions contains the names
Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 16
of parties debarred, suspended, or otherwise excluded by agencies, as well as parties declared ineligible under statutory or regulatory authority other than Executive Order 12549. Supplier certifies that neither it nor its principals are presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation by any federal department or agency.
G. BYRD ANTI-LOBBYING AMENDMENT, AS AMENDED (31 U.S.C. § 1352). Suppliers must file any required certifications. Suppliers must not have used federal appropriated funds to pay any person or organization for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with obtaining any federal contract, grant, or any other award covered by 31 U.S.C. § 1352. Suppliers must disclose any lobbying with non-federal funds that takes place in connection with obtaining any federal award. Such disclosures are forwarded from tier to tier up to the non-federal award. Suppliers must file all certifications and disclosures required by, and otherwise comply with, the Byrd Anti-Lobbying Amendment (31 U.S.C. § 1352).
H. RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS. To the extent applicable, Supplier must comply with the record retention requirements detailed in 2 C.F.R. § 200.333. The Supplier further certifies that it will retain all records as required by 2 C.F.R. § 200.333 for a period of 3 years after grantees or subgrantees submit final expenditure reports or quarterly or annual financial reports, as applicable, and all other pending matters are closed.
I. ENERGY POLICY AND CONSERVATION ACT COMPLIANCE. To the extent applicable, Supplier must comply with the mandatory standards and policies relating to energy efficiency which are contained in the state energy conservation plan issued in compliance with the Energy Policy and Conservation Act.
J. BUY AMERICAN PROVISIONS COMPLIANCE. To the extent applicable, Supplier must comply with all applicable provisions of the Buy American Act. Purchases made in accordance with the Buy American Act must follow the applicable procurement rules calling for free and open competition.
K. ACCESS TO RECORDS (2 C.F.R. § 200.336). Supplier agrees that duly authorized representatives of a federal agency must have access to any books, documents, papers and records of Supplier that are directly pertinent to Supplier’s discharge of its obligations under this Contract for the purpose of making audits, examinations, excerpts, and transcriptions. The right also includes timely and reasonable access to Supplier’s personnel for the purpose of interview and discussion relating to such documents.
L. PROCUREMENT OF RECOVERED MATERIALS (2 C.F.R. § 200.322). A non-federal entity that is a state agency or agency of a political subdivision of a state and its contractors must comply with Section 6002 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the Resource Conservation
Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 17
and Recovery Act. The requirements of Section 6002 include procuring only items designated in guidelines of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) at 40 C.F.R. § 247 that contain the highest percentage of recovered materials practicable, consistent with maintaining a satisfactory level of competition, where the purchase price of the item exceeds $10,000 or the value of the quantity acquired during the preceding fiscal year exceeded $10,000; procuring solid waste management services in a manner that maximizes energy and resource recovery; and establishing an affirmative procurement program for procurement of recovered materials identified in the EPA guidelines.
M. FEDERAL SEAL(S), LOGOS, AND FLAGS. The Supplier not use the seal(s), logos, crests, or reproductions of flags or likenesses of Federal agency officials without specific pre-approval.
N. NO OBLIGATION BY FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. The U.S. federal government is not a party to this Contract or any purchase by an Participating Entity and is not subject to any obligations or liabilities to the Participating Entity, Supplier, or any other party pertaining to any matter resulting from the Contract or any purchase by an authorized user.
O. PROGRAM FRAUD AND FALSE OR FRAUDULENT STATEMENTS OR RELATED ACTS. The Contractor acknowledges that 31 U.S.C. 38 (Administrative Remedies for False Claims and Statements) applies to the Supplier’s actions pertaining to this Contract or any purchase by a Participating Entity.
P. FEDERAL DEBT. The Supplier certifies that it is non-delinquent in its repayment of any federal debt. Examples of relevant debt include delinquent payroll and other taxes, audit disallowance, and benefit overpayments.
Q. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. The Supplier must notify the U.S. Office of General Services, Sourcewell, and Participating Entity as soon as possible if this Contract or any aspect related to the anticipated work under this Contract raises an actual or potential conflict of interest (as described in 2 C.F.R. Part 200). The Supplier must explain the actual or potential conflict in writing in sufficient detail so that the U.S. Office of General Services, Sourcewell, and Participating Entity are able to assess the actual or potential conflict; and provide any additional information as necessary or requested.
R. U.S. EXECUTIVE ORDER 13224. The Supplier, and its subcontractors, must comply with U.S.
Executive Order 13224 and U.S. Laws that prohibit transactions with and provision of resources and support to individuals and organizations associated with terrorism.
S. PROHIBITION ON CERTAIN TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR EQUIPMENT. To the extent applicable, Supplier certifies that during the term of this Contract it will comply with applicable requirements of 2 C.F.R. § 200.216.
Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 101221-SCA
Rev. 3/2021 18
T. DOMESTIC PREFERENCES FOR PROCUREMENTS. To the extent applicable, Supplier certifies that during the term of this Contract will comply with applicable requirements of 2 C.F.R. § 200.322.
22. CANCELLATION
Sourcewell or Supplier may cancel this Contract at any time, with or without cause, upon 60 days’ written notice to the other party. However, Sourcewell may cancel this Contract immediately upon discovery of a material defect in any certification made in Supplier’s Proposal. Cancellation of this Contract does not relieve either party of financial, product, or service obligations incurred or accrued prior to cancellation.
Sourcewell Sewer Equipment Co. of America
By: __________________________ By: __________________________ Jeremy Schwartz Shawn Bondele
Title: Chief Procurement Officer Title: Inside Sales Manager Date: ________________________ Date: ________________________ Approved:
By: __________________________
Chad Coauette
Title: Executive Director/CEO
Date: ________________________
Packet Pg. 223 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 5)36HZHU9DFXXP+\GUR([FDYDWLRQDQG0XQLFLSDO 3XPSLQJ(TXLSPHQWZLWK5HODWHG$FFHVVRULHVDQG6XSSOLHV 9HQGRU'HWDLOV
&RPSDQ\1DPH
6HZHU(TXLSPHQW&RRI$PHULFD
'RHV\RXUFRPSDQ\FRQGXFW
EXVLQHVVXQGHUDQ\RWKHUQDPH",I
\HVSOHDVHVWDWH
,/
$GGUHVV
'XWFK5RDG
',;21,/
&RQWDFW
6KDZQ%RQGHOH
(PDLO
VKDZQERQGHOH#VHZHUHTXLSPHQWFRP
3KRQH
)D[
+67
6XEPLVVLRQ'HWDLOV
&UHDWHG2Q
:HGQHVGD\$XJXVW
6XEPLWWHG2Q
0RQGD\2FWREHU
6XEPLWWHG%\
6KDZQ%RQGHOH
(PDLO
VKDZQERQGHOH#VHZHUHTXLSPHQWFRP
7UDQVDFWLRQ
HHHH
DHFGDIF
6XEPLWWHU
V,3$GGUHVV
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 6SHFLILFDWLRQV
7DEOH
3URSRVHU,GHQWLW\ $XWKRUL]HG5HSUHVHQWDWLYHV
*HQHUDO,QVWUXFWLRQV
DSSOLHVWRDOO7DEOHV
6RXUFHZHOOSUHIHUVDEULHIEXWWKRURXJKUHVSRQVHWRHDFKTXHVWLRQ'RQRWPHUHO\DWWDFKDGGLWLRQDOGRFXPHQWVWR\RXU UHVSRQVHZLWKRXWDOVRSURYLGLQJDVXEVWDQWLYHUHVSRQVH'RQRWOHDYHDQVZHUVEODQN UHVSRQG³1$´LIWKHTXHVWLRQGRHVQRWDSSO\WR\RX
SUHIHUDEO\ZLWKDQ
H[SODQDWLRQ
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
3URSRVHUௐ/HJDOௐ1DPHௐ
RQHௐOHJDOௐHQWLW\ௐRQO\
ௐௐ
,QௐWKHௐ
HYHQWௐRIௐDZDUGௐZLOOௐH[HFXWHௐWKHௐUHVXOWLQJௐFRQWUDFWௐ
DVௐ6XSSOLHU
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ&RௐRIௐ$PHULFD
,GHQWLI\ௐDOOௐVXEVLGLDU\ௐHQWLWLHVௐRIௐWKHௐ3URSRVHUௐZKRVHௐ HTXLSPHQWௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐVHUYLFHVௐDUHௐLQFOXGHGௐLQௐWKHௐ
3URSRVDO
5RFNௐ5HQWDOV
,GHQWLI\ௐDOOௐDSSOLFDEOHௐDVVXPHGௐQDPHVௐRUௐ'%$ௐQDPHVௐRIௐ WKHௐ3URSRVHUௐRUௐ3URSRVHU
VௐVXEVLGLDULHVௐLQௐ/LQHௐௐRUௐ
/LQHௐௐDERYH
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQW
3URSRVHUௐ3K\VLFDOௐ$GGUHVV
ௐ'XWFKௐ5Gௐ'L[RQௐ,/ௐ
3URSRVHUௐZHEVLWHௐDGGUHVVௐ
RUௐDGGUHVVHV
ZZZVHZHUHTXLSPHQWFRPௐZZZURFNUHQWDOFRPௐZZZVHZHUVKRSFRP
3URSRVHU
Vௐ$XWKRUL]HGௐ5HSUHVHQWDWLYHௐ
QDPHௐWLWOHௐ
DGGUHVVௐHPDLOௐDGGUHVVௐ ௐSKRQH
ௐ
7KHௐUHSUHVHQWDWLYHௐ
PXVWௐKDYHௐDXWKRULW\ௐWRௐVLJQௐWKHௐ³3URSRVHU¶Vௐ$VVXUDQFHௐ
RIௐ&RPSOLDQFH´ௐRQௐEHKDOIௐRIௐWKHௐ3URSRVHUௐDQGௐLQௐWKHௐ
HYHQWௐRIௐDZDUGௐZLOOௐEHௐH[SHFWHGௐWRௐH[HFXWHௐWKHௐUHVXOWLQJௐ
FRQWUDFW
6KDZQௐ%RQGHOH
,QVLGHௐ6DOHVௐ0DQDJHU
ௐ'XWFKௐ5G
'L[RQௐ,/ௐ
VKDZQERQGHOH#VHZHUHTXLSPHQWFRP
3URSRVHU
VௐSULPDU\ௐFRQWDFWௐIRUௐWKLVௐSURSRVDOௐ
QDPHௐWLWOHௐ
DGGUHVVௐHPDLOௐDGGUHVVௐ ௐSKRQH
6KDZQௐ%RQGHOH
,QVLGHௐ6DOHVௐ0DQDJHU
ௐ'XWFKௐ5G
'L[RQௐ,/ௐ
VKDZQERQGHOH#VHZHUHTXLSPHQWFRP
3URSRVHU
VௐRWKHUௐFRQWDFWVௐIRUௐWKLVௐSURSRVDOௐLIௐDQ\ௐ
QDPHௐWLWOHௐDGGUHVVௐHPDLOௐDGGUHVVௐ ௐSKRQH
7RPௐ+RFKPXWK
5HJLRQDOௐ6DOHVௐ0DQDJHU
ௐ'XWFKௐ5G
'L[RQௐ,/ௐ
WRPKRFKPXWK#VHZHUHTXLSPHQWFRP
9DQHVVDௐ*RPH]
,QVLGHௐ6DOHVௐ&RRUGLQDWRU
ௐ'XWFKௐ5G
'L[RQௐ,/ௐ
YDQHVVDJRPH]#VHZHUHTXLSPHQWFRP
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 7DEOH
&RPSDQ\,QIRUPDWLRQDQG)LQDQFLDO6WUHQJWK
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
3URYLGHௐDௐEULHIௐKLVWRU\ௐRIௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐLQFOXGLQJௐ\RXUௐ FRPSDQ\¶VௐFRUHௐYDOXHVௐEXVLQHVVௐSKLORVRSK\ௐDQGௐ
LQGXVWU\ௐORQJHYLW\ௐUHODWHGௐWRௐWKHௐUHTXHVWHGௐHTXLSPHQWௐ SURGXFWVௐRUௐVHUYLFHV
³%HVWௐ3URGXFWௐ%HVWௐ/RFDOௐ6XSSRUW´ௐLVௐDௐSURPLVHௐWRௐRXUௐFXVWRPHUVௐDQGௐLVௐDOVRௐDௐWDJOLQHௐWKDWௐDFWVௐDVௐ DௐJXLGLQJௐSULQFLSOHௐWRௐXVௐHDFKௐGD\ௐௐ:HௐKDYHௐORQJௐEHHQௐNQRZQௐIRUௐUREXVWௐDQGௐLQQRYDWLYHௐSURGXFWVௐWKDWௐ IRFXVௐRQௐVLPSOLFLW\ௐDQௐLQFUHDVLQJO\ௐUDUHௐFKDUDFWHULVWLFௐLQௐRXUௐPDUNHWSODFHௐௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐLVௐDOVRௐ XQLTXHௐDPRQJௐPDQXIDFWXUHUVௐIRUௐRXUௐEUHDGWKௐRIௐSURGXFWௐZKLFKௐXOWLPDWHO\ௐDOORZVௐRXUௐVDOHVSHRSOHௐDQGௐ GLVWULEXWRUVௐWRௐVHOOௐLQௐDௐFRQVXOWDWLYHௐIDVKLRQௐௐ1RௐRWKHUௐPDQXIDFWXUHௐSURYLGHVௐIXOOௐVL]HௐFRPELQDWLRQௐ
MHWYDFXXP
ௐWUXFNVௐPLQLௐFRPERௐWUXFNVௐZDWHUௐUHF\FOLQJௐFRPERௐWUXFNVௐWUXFNௐDQGௐWUDLOHUௐMHWVௐERWKௐODUJHௐ DQGௐVPDOOௐURGGHUVௐHDVHPHQWௐPDFKLQHVௐDQGௐDFFHVVRULHVௐIRUௐVHZHUௐFOHDQLQJௐDSSOLFDWLRQVௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐ SXUSRVHௐEXLOWௐK\GURௐH[FDYDWLRQௐDQGௐDLUௐH[FDYDWLRQௐWUXFNVௐRIௐDOOௐVL]HV 2XUௐ\HDUௐKLVWRU\ௐKDVௐEHHQௐRQHௐRIௐJURZWKௐDQGௐPHDQLQJIXOௐLQQRYDWLRQௐௐ,Qௐ ௐRXUௐIRXQGHUௐ+7ௐ
2¶%ULHQௐGHYHORSHGௐWKHௐLGHDௐRIௐXVLQJௐDௐURWDWLQJௐVSULQJௐWLSSHGௐURGௐIRUௐFOHDQLQJௐGUDLQVௐLQௐEXLOGLQJVௐDQGௐ DௐFRPSDQ\ௐZDVௐERUQௐௐ7KURXJKRXWௐWKHௐ
¶VௐDQGௐLQWRௐWKHௐ
¶Vௐ2¶%ULHQௐ0DQXIDFWXULQJௐUHILQHGௐDQGௐ
H[SDQGHGௐWKLVௐSULQFLSOHௐWRௐLQFOXGHௐWUDLOHUௐPRXQWHGௐURGGHUVௐIRUௐFOHDQLQJௐPDLQOLQHௐVHZHUௐSLSHVௐ±ௐWKHVHௐ URGGHUVௐZHUHௐWKHௐSUHGHFHVVRUVௐRIௐWRGD\¶VௐVHZHUௐMHWWHUVௐௐ7KHௐODWHௐ ¶VௐVDZௐWKHௐDGYHQWௐRIௐPRGHUQ
GD\ௐVHZHUௐMHWௐWUXFNVௐDQGௐZDWHUௐSRZHUHGௐURWDWLQJௐURRWௐFXWWHUVௐE\ௐ2¶%ULHQௐௐ2¶%ULHQௐ0DQXIDFWXULQJௐZDVௐ VROGௐLQௐWKHௐHDUO\ௐ¶VௐDQGௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ&RPSDQ\ௐRIௐ$PHULFDௐZDVௐRSHQHGௐE\ௐ-LPௐ2¶%ULHQௐVRQௐ RIௐWKHௐIRXQGHUௐௐ7KHௐFRPSDQ\ௐJUHZௐIURPௐDFFHVVRU\ௐVDOHVௐWRௐWKHௐPDQXIDFWXUHௐRIௐURGGHUVௐEXFNHWௐ PDFKLQHVௐYDFXXPௐWUDLOHUVௐDQGௐWUXFNௐDQGௐWUDLOHUௐMHWWHUVௐௐ,QௐWKHௐPLGௐ¶VௐZHௐEHJDQௐPDQXIDFWXULQJௐDQௐ H[WHQVLYHௐOLQHௐRIௐK\GURௐH[FDYDWLQJௐWUXFNVௐDQGௐWUDLOHUVௐௐ,QௐௐWKHௐFRPSDQ\ௐZDVௐPRYHGௐIURPௐDௐ ௐVTIWௐPDQXIDFWXULQJௐIDFLOLW\ௐLQௐ&KDGZLFNௐ,OௐWRௐDௐௐVTIWௐSODQWௐLQௐ'L[RQௐ,/ௐWRௐDFFRPPRGDWHௐ RXUௐJURZWKௐௐ7KLVௐPRYHௐDOORZHGௐXVௐWRௐEHJLQௐSURGXFLQJௐWKHௐ (&2ௐFRPELQDWLRQௐVHZHUௐFOHDQHUௐ
ௐௐ,QௐWKHௐௐ\HDUVௐVLQFHௐLWVௐUHOHDVHௐWKHௐ
(&2ௐKDVௐDFKLHYHGௐDSSUR[LPDWHO\ௐDௐௐVKDUHௐRIௐ
WKLVௐKRWO\ௐFRQWHVWHGௐVHJPHQWௐPHDVXUHGௐLQௐDQQXDOௐQHZௐWUXFNௐVDOHVௐLQௐWKHௐ86ௐௐ,QௐWKHௐODVWௐௐ\HDUVௐZHௐ KDYHௐDOVRௐUHOHDVHGௐWKHௐ(&2ௐPLQLௐFRPERௐWUXFNௐWKHௐ*HQHVLVௐZDWHUௐUHF\FOLQJௐFRPERௐDQGௐWKHௐ$; ௐDLUௐH[FDYDWRUௐWUXFNௐௐ0D\ௐRIௐௐPDUNHGௐWKHௐFRPSOHWLRQௐRIௐRXUௐ WKௐSLHFHௐRIௐ³ELJௐ
HTXLSPHQW´ௐLQௐFRPSDQ\ௐKLVWRU\
:KDWௐDUHௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\¶VௐH[SHFWDWLRQVௐLQௐWKHௐHYHQWௐRIௐ DQௐDZDUG"
:HௐZRXOGௐLPPHGLDWHO\ௐVFKHGXOHௐDௐYLGHRௐFRQIHUHQFHௐPHHWLQJௐZLWKௐDOOௐGLVWULEXWRUௐVDOHVௐSHUVRQQHOௐ UHLWHUDWLQJௐWKHௐWHUPVௐRIௐWKHௐFRQWUDFWௐDQGௐFDOOLQJௐDWWHQWLRQௐWRௐDQ\ௐFKDQJHVௐௐ7KLVௐZRXOGௐEHௐIROORZHGௐXSௐ ZLWKௐLQௐSHUVRQௐUHYLHZVௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐHPDLOௐௐVRFLDOௐPHGLDௐEODVWVௐWRௐGHDOHUVௐDQGௐHQGௐXVHUVௐௐ:HௐZRXOGௐ UHPDLQௐWKHௐVROHௐVRXUFHௐRIௐUHVSRQVLELOLW\ௐIRUௐWKLVௐFRQWUDFWௐDQGௐZRXOGௐKDQGOHௐDOOௐRUGHUௐHQWU\ௐDQGௐUHSRUWLQJௐ WDVNVௐUHTXLUHGௐE\ௐWKHௐFRQWUDFWௐDVௐZHௐFXUUHQWO\ௐGR
'HPRQVWUDWHௐ\RXUௐILQDQFLDOௐVWUHQJWKௐDQGௐVWDELOLW\ௐZLWKௐ PHDQLQJIXOௐGDWDௐ7KLVௐFRXOGௐLQFOXGHௐVXFKௐLWHPVௐDVௐ
ILQDQFLDOௐVWDWHPHQWVௐ6(&ௐILOLQJVௐFUHGLWௐDQGௐERQGௐ
UDWLQJVௐOHWWHUVௐRIௐFUHGLWௐDQGௐGHWDLOHGௐUHIHUHQFHௐOHWWHUVௐ 8SORDGௐVXSSRUWLQJௐGRFXPHQWVௐ
DVௐDSSOLFDEOH
ௐLQௐWKHௐ
GRFXPHQWௐXSORDGௐVHFWLRQௐRIௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVH
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐKDVௐDௐFRQVLVWHQWௐWUDFNௐUHFRUGௐRIௐJURZWKௐDQGௐSURILWDELOLW\ௐ7KHௐFRPSDQ\¶VௐSDVWௐ SHUIRUPDQFHௐDVVXUHVௐDPSOHௐUHVRXUFHVௐWRௐHQKDQFHௐRXUௐSURGXFWௐRIIHULQJVௐIRUௐWKHௐPDUNHWVௐZHௐVHUYHௐ 6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐPDLQWDLQVௐLQVXUDQFHௐFRYHUDJHௐWKDWௐLVௐFXVWRPDU\ௐIRUௐWKHௐEXVLQHVVௐEHLQJௐFRQGXFWHGௐௐ
$WWDFKPHQWௐ±ௐௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ&R«««ௐௐ±ௐ+XQWLQJWRQௐ1DWLRQDOௐ%DQN«««««ௐௐ±ௐ ௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ&2,
:KDWௐLVௐ\RXUௐ86ௐPDUNHWௐVKDUHௐIRUௐWKHௐVROXWLRQVௐWKDWௐ \RXௐDUHௐSURSRVLQJ"
2XUௐ86ௐ0DUNHWௐ6KDUHௐGDWDௐOLVWHGௐKHUHௐIRUௐFRPELQDWLRQௐWUXFNVௐWUXFNௐMHWVௐDQGௐK\GURௐH[FDYDWLRQௐWUXFNVௐ LVௐEDVHGௐRQௐGDWDௐUHSRUWLQJௐWKURXJKௐWKHௐ$PHULFDQௐ$VVRFLDWLRQௐRIௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUV &RPELQDWLRQௐ6HZHUௐ&OHDQHUVௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
\WG
ௐ
7UXFNௐ-HWVௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
\WG
ௐ
+\GUR([FDYDWLRQௐ7UXFNVௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐௐௐ
\WG
ௐ
:KDWௐLVௐ\RXUௐ&DQDGLDQௐPDUNHWௐVKDUHௐIRUௐWKHௐVROXWLRQVௐ WKDWௐ\RXௐDUHௐSURSRVLQJ"
2XUௐ&DQDGLDQௐ0DUNHWௐ6KDUHௐGDWDௐOLVWHGௐKHUHௐIRUௐFRPELQDWLRQௐWUXFNVௐWUXFNௐMHWVௐDQGௐK\GURH[FDYDWLRQௐ WUXFNVௐLVௐEDVHGௐRQௐGDWDௐUHSRUWLQJௐWKURXJKௐWKHௐ$PHULFDQௐ$VVRFLDWLRQௐRIௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUV ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
&RPELQDWLRQௐ6HZHUௐ&OHDQHUVௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
\WG
7UXFNௐ-HWVௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
\WG
ௐ
+\GUR([FDYDWLRQௐ7UXFNVௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
\WG
ௐ
+DVௐ\RXUௐEXVLQHVVௐHYHUௐSHWLWLRQHGௐIRUௐEDQNUXSWF\ௐ
SURWHFWLRQ"ௐ,IௐVRௐH[SODLQௐLQௐGHWDLO
6LQFHௐLWVௐIRUPDWLRQௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐKDVௐQHYHUௐSHWLWLRQHGௐIRUௐEDQNUXSWF\ௐSURWHFWLRQ
+RZௐLVௐ\RXUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐEHVWௐGHVFULEHG
ௐLVௐLWௐDௐ
PDQXIDFWXUHUௐDௐGLVWULEXWRUGHDOHUUHVHOOHUௐRUௐDௐVHUYLFHௐ SURYLGHU"ௐௐ$QVZHUௐZKLFKHYHUௐTXHVWLRQௐ
HLWKHUௐD
ௐRUௐE
ௐ
MXVWௐEHORZ
ௐEHVWௐDSSOLHVௐWRௐ\RXUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQ
D
ௐௐௐௐ,Iௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐLVௐEHVWௐGHVFULEHGௐDVௐDௐ
GLVWULEXWRUGHDOHUUHVHOOHUௐ
RUௐVLPLODUௐHQWLW\
ௐSURYLGHௐ\RXUௐ
ZULWWHQௐDXWKRUL]DWLRQௐWRௐDFWௐDVௐDௐ
GLVWULEXWRUGHDOHUUHVHOOHUௐIRUௐWKHௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐRIௐWKHௐ SURGXFWVௐSURSRVHGௐLQௐWKLVௐ5)3ௐ,IௐDSSOLFDEOHௐLVௐ\RXUௐ
GHDOHUௐQHWZRUNௐLQGHSHQGHQWௐRUௐFRPSDQ\ௐRZQHG"
E
ௐௐௐௐ,Iௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐLVௐEHVWௐGHVFULEHGௐDVௐDௐ
PDQXIDFWXUHUௐRUௐVHUYLFHௐSURYLGHUௐGHVFULEHௐ\RXUௐ
UHODWLRQVKLSௐZLWKௐ\RXUௐVDOHVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHௐIRUFHௐDQGௐZLWKௐ \RXUௐGHDOHUௐQHWZRUNௐLQௐGHOLYHULQJௐWKHௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐ
VHUYLFHVௐSURSRVHGௐLQௐWKLVௐ5)3ௐ$UHௐWKHVHௐLQGLYLGXDOVௐ
\RXUௐHPSOR\HHVௐRUௐWKHௐHPSOR\HHVௐRIௐDௐWKLUGௐSDUW\"
$VௐDௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐRXUௐSULPDU\ௐPHDQVௐRIௐJRLQJௐWRௐPDUNHWௐLVௐYLDௐH[FOXVLYHௐGLVWULEXWRUVௐWKDWௐDUHௐW\SLFDOO\ௐ UHVSRQVLEOHௐIRUௐFRYHULQJௐWKHௐPXQLFLSDOௐHQWLWLHVௐLQௐDQௐHQWLUHௐVWDWHVWDWHVௐPXOWLSOHௐSURYLQFHVௐRUௐPXOWLSOHௐ FRXQWULHVௐௐ:HௐKDYHௐGLVWULEXWRUVௐLQௐௐ6WDWHVௐDQGௐௐ3URYLGHQFHVௐLQௐ&DQDGDௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐௐRYHUVHDVௐ FRXQWULHVௐௐ7KHௐRQO\ௐH[FHSWLRQௐLVௐLQௐVRPHௐVWDWHVSURYLQFHVௐWKDWௐDUHௐLQௐDௐWUDQVLWLRQDOௐSKDVHௐௐ 'LVWULEXWRUVௐDFWௐRQௐRXUௐEHKDOIௐDVௐORFDOௐVDOHVௐVHUYLFHௐWUDLQLQJௐDQGௐZDUUDQW\ௐSURYLGHUVௐௐ7KHVHௐ GLVWULEXWRUௐVDOHVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHௐSHRSOHௐDUHௐUGௐSDUW\ௐHPSOR\HHVௐDQGௐDUHௐORRNHGௐDIWHUௐE\ௐUHJLRQDOௐVDOHVௐ PDQDJHUVௐIURPௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐௐ'LVWULEXWRUௐVHUYLFHௐSHUVRQQHOௐZRUNௐFORVHO\ௐZLWKௐDQGௐKDYHௐGLUHFWௐ DFFHVVௐWRௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQW¶VௐZDUUDQW\ௐGHSDUWPHQWௐWHFKQLFDOௐVHUYLFHௐGHSDUWPHQWௐDQGௐHQJLQHHULQJௐJURXS
,IௐDSSOLFDEOHௐSURYLGHௐDௐGHWDLOHGௐH[SODQDWLRQௐRXWOLQLQJௐ WKHௐOLFHQVHVௐDQGௐFHUWLILFDWLRQVௐWKDWௐDUHௐERWKௐUHTXLUHGௐWRௐ EHௐKHOGௐDQGௐDFWXDOO\ௐKHOGௐE\ௐ\RXUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐ
LQFOXGLQJௐWKLUGௐSDUWLHVௐDQGௐVXEFRQWUDFWRUVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐXVH ௐ
LQௐSXUVXLWௐRIௐWKHௐEXVLQHVVௐFRQWHPSODWHGௐE\ௐWKLVௐ5)3
$VௐDௐ8QLWHGௐ6WDWHVௐEDVHGௐFRPSDQ\ௐZHௐDUHௐDQௐ,OOLQRLVௐFRUSRUDWLRQௐUHJLVWHUHGௐZLWKௐWKHௐ,OOLQRLVௐ6HFUHWDU\ௐ RIௐ6WDWHௐ
)LOHௐ1Rௐ
ௐௐ2XUௐ)HGHUDOௐ(PSOR\HUௐ,GHQWLILFDWLRQௐ1XPEHUௐLVௐௐௐ2XUௐ,OOLQRLVௐ &HUWLILFDWHௐRIௐ5HVDOHௐ1XPEHUௐLVௐௐௐ
$VௐDௐPDQXIDFWXULQJௐPDNLQJௐPRELOHௐSURGXFWVௐRSHUDWLQJௐRQௐ86ௐKLJKZD\VௐZHௐKDYHௐWZRௐGHDOHUௐOLFHQVHVௐௐ '/ௐIRUௐWUXFNVௐDQGௐ'/7
ௐIRUௐWUDLOHUVௐௐ(DFKௐRIௐRXUௐ'HDOHUVௐDOVRௐKROGௐ'HDOHUௐ/LFHQVHVௐLQௐWKHLUௐ UHVSHFWLYHௐWHUULWRULHV
:KHUHௐUHTXLUHGௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐLVௐOLFHQVHGௐDVௐDௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUௐRUௐ0RWRUௐ9HKLFOHௐ&RQYHUWHUௐLQFOXGLQJௐ ,RZDௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUௐ/LFHQVHௐ1Rௐ0ௐ7H[DVௐ0RWRUௐ9HKLFOHௐ&RQYHUWHUௐ/LFHQVHௐ1Rௐௐ/RXLVLDQDௐ 0RWRUௐ9HKLFOHௐ&RQYHUWHUௐ/LFHQVHௐ1Rௐ&9ௐ:DVKLQJWRQௐ9HKLFOHௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUௐ/LFHQVHௐ1Rௐ ௐDQGௐ0RQWDQDௐ1HZௐ0RWRUௐ9HKLFOHௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUௐ/LFHQVHௐ1Rௐ ௐ
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐLVௐDOVRௐDௐPHPEHUௐRIௐWKHௐ1DWLRQDOௐ$VVRFLDWLRQௐRIௐ7UDLOHUௐ0DQXIDFWXUHUVௐௐ7KLVௐ DVVXUHVௐRXUௐWUDLOHUVௐDUHௐPDQXIDFWXUHGௐLQௐDFFRUGDQFHௐZLWKௐDOOௐ'27ௐDQGௐ1$70ௐJXLGHOLQHV
3URYLGHௐDOOௐ³6XVSHQVLRQௐRUௐ'HEDUPHQW´ௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐWKDWௐ KDVௐDSSOLHGௐWRௐ\RXUௐRUJDQL]DWLRQௐGXULQJௐWKHௐSDVWௐWHQௐ
\HDUV
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐKDVௐQRWௐZLWKLQௐWKHௐWHQ\HDUௐSHULRGௐSUHFHGLQJௐWKLVௐELGௐEHHQௐGHEDUUHGௐRUௐVXVSHQGHGௐ IURPௐDQ\ௐSXEOLFௐWUDQVDFWLRQVௐ
)HGHUDOௐ6WDWHௐRUௐORFDO
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 7DEOH
,QGXVWU\5HFRJQLWLRQ 0DUNHWSODFH6XFFHVV
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐUHOHYDQWௐLQGXVWU\ௐDZDUGVௐRUௐUHFRJQLWLRQௐ WKDWௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐKDVௐUHFHLYHGௐLQௐWKHௐSDVWௐILYHௐ\HDUV
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐZDVௐDZDUGHGௐSDWHQWௐQXPEHUௐ³86ௐ
ௐ%´ௐIRUௐRXUௐ+\GUR'ULYHௐV\VWHPௐRQௐ
-DQXDU\ௐ
WKௐௐௐ7KLVௐ+\GUR'ULYHௐ6\VWHPௐLVௐWKHௐKHDUWௐRIௐRXUௐ (&2ௐ&RPELQDWLRQௐ6HZHUௐ
&OHDQHUௐDQGௐKDVௐEHHQௐDௐPDMRUௐFRQWULEXWRUௐWRௐWKHௐFRQWLQXHGௐJURZWKௐDQGௐVXFFHVVௐRIௐRXUௐFRPSDQ\ ,QௐWKHௐ-XO\ௐௐLVVXHௐRIௐ7+(ௐ081,&,3$/ௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐZDVௐIHDWXUHGௐLQௐDQௐDUWLFOHௐ³0RYLQJௐ %H\RQGௐ7UDQVDFWLRQDOௐ5HODWLRQVKLSVௐ7RZDUGௐ3DUWQHUVKLSV´ௐUHIHUHQFLQJௐDௐVDOHௐWRௐ.LQJௐ&RXQW\ௐ:$ௐ ZKHUHௐWKH\ௐXWLOL]HGௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐIRUௐWKHௐSXUFKDVHௐDQGௐ1DWLRQDOௐ&RRSHUDWLYHௐ/HDVHௐIRUௐWKHௐ ILQDQFLQJ
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQW¶VௐSURGXFWVௐDUHௐLQௐIRFXVௐRQௐDOPRVWௐDௐPRQWKO\ௐEDVLVௐLQௐ,QGXVWU\ௐ7UDGHௐ3XEOLFDWLRQVௐ VXFKௐDVௐ&/($1(5ௐ',*ௐ',))(5(17ௐDQGௐ081,&,3$/ௐ:$7(5ௐ ௐ6(:(5
:KDWௐSHUFHQWDJHௐRIௐ\RXUௐVDOHVௐDUHௐWRௐWKHௐ
JRYHUQPHQWDOௐVHFWRUௐLQௐWKHௐSDVWௐWKUHHௐ\HDUV
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
:KDWௐSHUFHQWDJHௐRIௐ\RXUௐVDOHVௐDUHௐWRௐWKHௐHGXFDWLRQௐ
VHFWRUௐLQௐWKHௐSDVWௐWKUHHௐ\HDUV
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
/LVWௐDQ\ௐVWDWHௐSURYLQFLDOௐRUௐFRRSHUDWLYHௐSXUFKDVLQJௐ FRQWUDFWVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐKROGௐ:KDWௐLVௐWKHௐDQQXDOௐVDOHVௐ
YROXPHௐIRUௐHDFKௐRIௐWKHVHௐFRQWUDFWVௐRYHUௐWKHௐSDVWௐWKUHHௐ \HDUV"
7KHௐILJXUHVௐEHORZௐGRௐQRWௐLQFOXGHௐVWDWHௐDQGௐRWKHUௐORFDOௐFRQWUDFWVௐWKDWௐDUHௐPDQDJHVௐE\ௐRXUௐ GLVWULEXWRUVௐௐ7KHVHௐDUHௐRQO\ௐFRQWUDFWௐKHOGௐGLUHFWO\ௐE\ௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQW +*$&ௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
6WDWHௐRIௐ2KLRௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐ
ௐ
)ORULGDௐ6KHULIIVௐௐ
ௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
%X\%RDUGௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
/LVWௐDQ\ௐ*6$ௐFRQWUDFWVௐRUௐ6WDQGLQJௐ2IIHUVௐDQGௐ6XSSO\ௐ $UUDQJHPHQWVௐ
626$
ௐWKDWௐ\RXௐKROGௐ:KDWௐLVௐWKHௐ
DQQXDOௐVDOHVௐYROXPHௐIRUௐHDFKௐRIௐWKHVHௐFRQWUDFWVௐRYHUௐ
WKHௐSDVWௐWKUHHௐ\HDUV"
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐSDUWQHUVௐZLWKௐ)HGKDUPRQ\ௐRQௐDௐ*6$ௐFRQWUDFWௐௐ:HௐDOVRௐGLUHFWO\ௐKROGௐDௐ'/$ௐ FRQWUDFW
ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
*6$ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
'/$ௐௐௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐௐௐ
ௐ
ௐௐ
ௐௐௐௐௐௐ
ௐ
7DEOH
5HIHUHQFHV7HVWLPRQLDOV
/LQH,WHP6XSSO\UHIHUHQFHLQIRUPDWLRQIURPWKUHHFXVWRPHUVZKRDUHHOLJLEOHWREH6RXUFHZHOOSDUWLFLSDWLQJHQWLWLHV (QWLW\1DPH
&RQWDFW1DPH
3KRQH1XPEHU
&LW\ௐRIௐ5HQRௐ19 =DFௐ+DIIQHU
&LW\ௐRIௐ6DOHPௐ25 -HUU\ௐ6PLWK
&LW\ௐRIௐ$WODQWDௐ*$ 5REHUWௐ+RUWRQ
7DEOH
7RS)LYH*RYHUQPHQWRU(GXFDWLRQ&XVWRPHUV
/LQH,WHP3URYLGHDOLVWRI\RXUWRSILYHJRYHUQPHQWHGXFDWLRQRUQRQSURILWFXVWRPHUV HQWLW\QDPHLVRSWLRQDO
LQFOXGLQJHQWLW\W\SHWKHVWDWHRUSURYLQFHWKH
HQWLW\LVORFDWHGLQVFRSHRIWKHSURMHFW
V
VL]HRIWUDQVDFWLRQ
V
DQGGROODUYROXPHVIURPWKHSDVWWKUHH\HDUV
(QWLW\1DPH (QWLW\7\SH
6WDWH3URYLQFH
6FRSHRI:RUN
6L]HRI7UDQVDFWLRQV
'ROODU9ROXPH3DVW7KUHH
<HDUV
&LW\ௐRIௐ$WODQWDௐ*$ *RYHUQPHQW *HRUJLD*$ &RPELQDWLRQௐ6HZHUௐ&OHDQHUV ௐௐ (&2
V
&LW\ௐRIௐ5HQRௐ19 *RYHUQPHQW 1HYDGD19 &RPELQDWLRQௐ6HZHUௐ&OHDQHUVௐ7UXFNௐ -HWVௐ(DVHPHQWௐ0DFKLQHV
ௐௐ+35Vௐௐௐ
(&2
Vௐ
ௐௐ-$-:+
6QRKRPLVKௐ&RXQW\ *RYHUQPHQW :DVKLQJWRQ:$ &RPELQDWLRQௐ6HZHUௐ&OHDQHUV ௐௐ (&2
V
&LW\ௐRIௐ6DOHPௐ25 *RYHUQPHQW 2UHJRQ25 &RPELQDWLRQௐ6HZHUௐ&OHDQHUV ௐௐ (&2
V
&LW\ௐRIௐ+DPLOWRQௐ
21 *RYHUQPHQW 212QWDULR +\GURௐ([FDYDWRUV ௐௐ5DPYDFௐ+; V
7DEOH
$ELOLW\WR6HOODQG'HOLYHU6HUYLFH
'HVFULEH\RXUFRPSDQ\¶VFDSDELOLW\WRPHHWWKHQHHGVRI6RXUFHZHOOSDUWLFLSDWLQJHQWLWLHVDFURVVWKH86DQG&DQDGDDVDSSOLFDEOH<RXUUHVSRQVHVKRXOGDGGUHVV LQGHWDLODWOHDVWWKHIROORZLQJDUHDV
ORFDWLRQVRI\RXUQHWZRUNRIVDOHVDQGVHUYLFHSURYLGHUVWKHQXPEHURIZRUNHUV IXOOWLPHHTXLYDOHQWV
LQYROYHGLQHDFKVHFWRU
ZKHWKHUWKHVHZRUNHUVDUH\RXUGLUHFWHPSOR\HHV
RUHPSOR\HHVRIDWKLUGSDUW\
DQGDQ\RYHUODSEHWZHHQWKHVDOHVDQGVHUYLFHIXQFWLRQV /LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
6DOHVௐIRUFH :HௐGLUHFWO\ௐHPSOR\ௐDௐQDWLRQDOௐVDOHVௐPDQDJHUௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐDQௐHDVWHUQௐFHQWUDOௐDQGௐZHVWHUQௐUHJLRQDOௐVDOHVௐ PDQDJHUௐWKDWௐDUHௐUHVSRQVLEOHௐIRUௐRXUௐGLVWULEXWRUௐQHWZRUNௐௐ:HௐHPSOR\ௐௐLQVLGHௐVDOHVSHRSOHௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐ ௐGLUHFWௐVDOHVSHRSOHௐWKDWௐVHUYHௐPDUNHWVௐWKDWௐDUHௐQRWௐIXOO\ௐFRYHUHGௐE\ௐGLVWULEXWLRQௐ SULPDULO\ௐFRQWUDFWRUVௐ
EXWௐDOVRௐVRPHௐIHGHUDOௐDJHQFLHVௐDQGௐHGXFDWLRQௐWRௐDௐYHU\ௐVPDOOௐGHJUHH ௐ7KUHHௐIXOOௐWLPHௐGHPRQVWUDWLRQௐ
VSHFLDOLVWVௐZRUNௐZLWKௐRXUௐUHJLRQDOௐVDOHVௐPDQDJHUVௐDQGௐGLVWULEXWRUௐVDOHVSHRSOHௐWRௐDOORZௐRXUௐFXVWRPHUVௐ WRௐ³WU\ௐLWௐEHIRUHௐWKH\ௐEX\ௐLW´ௐZKLFKௐLVௐDௐYHU\ௐLPSRUWDQWௐDVSHFWௐRIௐRXUௐVDOHVௐSURJUDP
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 'HDOHUௐQHWZRUNௐRUௐRWKHUௐGLVWULEXWLRQௐPHWKRGV ,QௐWRWDOௐRXUௐGLVWULEXWRUௐQHWZRUNௐHPSOR\VௐDSSUR[LPDWHO\ௐௐVDOHVSHRSOHௐௐ$VௐDௐSUHPLXPௐVSHFLDOW\ௐ SURGXFWௐRXUௐGLVWULEXWRUVௐDUHௐTXLWHௐIRFXVHGௐRQௐWKHௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐOLQHௐW\SLFDOO\ௐVSHQGLQJௐௐRUௐ PRUHௐRIௐWKHLUௐHIIRUWVௐRQௐRXUௐRIIHULQJVௐௐ$ௐQHZௐIRFXVௐPRYLQJௐIRUZDUGௐZLOOௐEHௐDQௐLQWHQVLYHௐSURGXFWௐDQGௐ SUHVHQWDWLRQௐWHFKQLTXHௐWUDLQLQJௐ
6($/ௐௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ$GYDQFHGௐ/HDUQLQJ
ௐSURJUDPௐIRUௐRXUௐ
GLVWULEXWRUVௐZLWKௐWKHௐJRDOௐEHLQJௐWKHௐPRVWௐHGXFDWHGௐDQGௐNQRZOHGJHDEOHௐVDOHVௐVWDIIௐLQௐWKHௐLQGXVWU\ௐௐ7KLVௐ KDVௐDOUHDG\ௐEHJXQௐZLWKௐDௐGHDOHUௐ³ZDONDURXQG´ௐHYHQWௐ
OLYHௐSURGXFWௐSUHVHQWDWLRQ
ௐLQௐZKLFKௐGHDOHUௐ
VDOHVSHRSOHௐSUHVHQWHGௐVHYHUDOௐSURGXFWVௐWRௐWKHLUௐSHHUVௐDQGௐIDFWRU\ௐSHUVRQQHOௐDQGௐZHUHௐJUDGHGௐIRUௐ FHUWLILFDWLRQௐSXUSRVHVௐௐ7KLVௐSURJUDPௐZLOOௐEHௐH[SDQGHGௐZLWKௐPRUHௐHYHQWVௐDQGௐPRUHௐFRQWHQWௐLQௐWKHௐ FRPLQJௐ\HDUV
6HUYLFHௐIRUFH
6HHௐDWWDFKPHQW
ௐௐௐ6HUYLFHௐ'LVWULEXWRUௐ0DSௐ±ௐ86
ௐௐ$VௐWKHௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐGLVWULEXWRUௐQHWZRUNௐ
HYROYHVௐRXUௐVHUYLFHௐSUHVHQFHௐKDVௐLPSURYHGௐLQௐUHFHQWௐ\HDUVௐௐ:LWKௐPRUHௐSURIHVVLRQDOௐRUJDQL]DWLRQVௐLQௐ RXUௐUDQNVௐRXUௐQXPEHUௐRIௐVHUYLFHௐWHFKVௐDWௐWKHௐGHDOHUௐLQௐWKHௐ86ௐDQGௐ&DQDGDௐLVௐDSSUR[LPDWHO\ௐௐௐ (DFKௐRIௐRXUௐGLVWULEXWRUVௐLVௐUHTXLUHGௐWRௐKDYHௐDWௐOHDVWௐWZRௐWHFKQLFLDQVௐFHUWLILHGௐDWௐ6HZHUௐ8QLYHUVLW\ௐDௐPXOWL GD\ௐFODVVௐWKDWௐLVௐUHJXODUO\ௐKHOGௐDWௐRXUௐ'L[RQௐ,/ௐKHDGTXDUWHUVௐௐ
ௐRIௐRXUௐFXVWRPHU¶VௐVHUYLFHௐQHHGVௐ
DUHௐDFFRPPRGDWHGௐDWௐWKHௐGLVWULEXWRUௐOHYHOௐௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐDOVRௐHPSOR\VௐௐPRELOHௐVHUYLFHௐ WHFKQLFLDQVௐHTXLSSHGௐZLWKௐVHUYLFHௐWUXFNVௐWKDWௐILOOௐLQௐDQ\ௐJDSVௐLQௐVHUYLFHௐFRYHUDJHௐDQGௐFRYHUௐVSHFLDOௐ SURMHFWVௐ
$ௐUHODWLYHO\ௐXQLTXHௐRIIHULQJௐIRUௐFXVWRPHUVௐLQௐUHPRWHௐUHJLRQVௐLVௐRXUௐZLOOLQJQHVVௐWRௐSURYLGHௐZDUUDQW\ௐ FRYHUDJHௐYLDௐDௐUGௐSDUW\ௐUHSDLUௐVKRSௐRIௐWKHLUௐFKRLFHௐRIௐWKHLUௐFKRLFHௐRUௐWRௐUHLPEXUVHௐWKHௐFXVWRPHUௐWRௐ SHUIRUPௐVLPSOHௐZDUUDQW\ௐUHSDLUVௐWKHPVHOYHVௐௐ7KLVௐLVௐYHU\ௐSRSXODUௐDPRQJௐFXVWRPHUVௐLQௐWKHௐUXUDOௐZHVWHUQௐ 86ௐDQGௐLVௐODUJHO\ௐPDGHௐSRVVLEOHௐE\ௐRXUௐVLPSOHௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐIDFWRU\ௐWHFKௐVXSSRUW
'HVFULEHௐWKHௐRUGHULQJௐSURFHVVௐ,IௐRUGHUVௐZLOOௐEHௐ
KDQGOHGௐE\ௐGLVWULEXWRUVௐGHDOHUVௐRUௐRWKHUVௐH[SODLQௐWKHௐ UHVSHFWLYHௐUROHVௐRIௐWKHௐ3URSRVHUௐDQGௐRWKHUV
$VௐLQௐWKHௐSDVWௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐGLVWULEXWRUVௐZLOOௐSURYLGHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐTXRWDWLRQVௐWRௐFXVWRPHUVௐDQGௐZLOOௐ DFFHSWௐSXUFKDVHௐRUGHUVௐIURPௐFXVWRPHUVௐIROORZLQJௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐJXLGHOLQHVௐDVௐFDOOHGௐRXWௐLQௐRXUௐ4XLFNௐVWDUWௐ JXLGHௐIRUௐGLVWULEXWRUVௐZKLFKௐZLOOௐEHௐXSGDWHGௐ
$WWDFKPHQWௐௐௐ4XLFNௐ6WDUWௐ*XLGHௐIRUௐGHDOHUVௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ ,17(51$/ௐௐUHYௐ
ௐௐ8SRQௐVHFXULQJௐWKHௐRUGHUௐIURPௐWKHௐHQGௐXVHUௐWKHௐGLVWULEXWRUௐZLOOௐLQௐWXUQௐ SODFHௐWKHLUௐRUGHUௐZLWKௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐDQGௐPXVWௐLQFOXGHௐDௐFRS\ௐRIௐWKHLUௐFXVWRPHU¶VௐSXUFKDVHௐRUGHUௐ FRPSOHWHௐZLWKௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐGLVFRXQWௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐFXVWRPHUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐQXPEHUௐDQGௐRXUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐFRQWUDFWௐ QXPEHUௐௐ6DLGௐLQௐDௐVLPSOHUௐZD\ௐFXVWRPHUVௐZLOOௐRUGHUௐIURPௐWKHLUௐDXWKRUL]HGௐGLVWULEXWRUௐDQGௐWKHௐGLVWULEXWRUௐ ZLOOௐRUGHUௐIURPௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐDVௐWKH\ௐQRUPDOO\ௐZRXOGௐZLWKௐWKHௐH[FHSWLRQௐWKDWௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐTXRWHௐDQGௐ RUGHUௐSURWRFROVௐZLOOௐEHௐIROORZHG
'HVFULEHௐLQௐGHWDLOௐWKHௐSURFHVVௐDQGௐSURFHGXUHௐRIௐ
\RXUௐFXVWRPHUௐVHUYLFHௐSURJUDPௐLIௐDSSOLFDEOHௐௐ
,QFOXGHௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVHWLPHௐFDSDELOLWLHVௐDQGௐ
FRPPLWPHQWVௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐDQ\ௐLQFHQWLYHVௐWKDWௐKHOSௐ
\RXUௐSURYLGHUVௐPHHWௐ\RXUௐVWDWHGௐVHUYLFHௐJRDOVௐRUௐ
SURPLVHV
7KHௐILUVWௐDQGௐOLNHO\ௐPRVWௐLPSRUWDQWௐDVSHFWௐRIௐRXUௐVHUYLFHௐSURJUDPௐLVௐEXLOGLQJௐHTXLSPHQWௐWKDWௐFDQௐEHௐ ZRUNHGௐRQௐE\ௐWKHௐFXVWRPHUௐRUௐDௐORFDOௐVKRSௐௐ%HFDXVHௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐKDVௐFRQVFLRXVO\ௐDYRLGHGௐWKHௐ XVHௐRIௐFRPSXWHUVௐFLUFXLWௐERDUGVௐDQGௐ&$1EXVௐFRPPXQLFDWLRQௐSURWRFROVௐLQௐRXUௐSURGXFWVௐDௐPHFKDQLFௐ ZLWKௐWUDGLWLRQDOௐVNLOOVௐDQGௐDௐNQRZOHGJHௐRIௐYROWௐZLULQJௐV\VWHPVௐFDQௐRIWHQௐKHOSௐWKHPVHOYHV ,IௐWKHௐFXVWRPHUௐGRHVௐQRWௐSRVVHVVௐWKHௐVNLOOVௐRUௐFDQQRWௐUHVROYHௐWKHௐLVVXHௐRQௐWKHLUௐRZQௐWKH\ௐVKRXOGௐPDNHௐ DௐFDOOௐWRௐWKHLUௐORFDOௐGLVWULEXWRUௐWRௐVFKHGXOHௐDௐVHUYLFHௐYLVLWௐRUௐWRௐRXUௐFRUSRUDWHௐVHUYLFHௐWHFKQLFLDQVௐIRUௐ DVVLVWDQFHௐYLDௐWKHௐSKRQH
2XUௐFRUSRUDWHௐLQKRXVHௐFXVWRPHUௐVHUYLFHௐGHSDUWPHQWௐLVௐFRPSULVHGௐRIௐERWKௐSDUWVௐVDOHVௐVSHFLDOLVWVௐDQGௐ WHFKQLFDOௐVXSSRUWௐVSHFLDOLVWVௐWKDWௐSURYLGHௐWROOIUHHௐVHUYLFHௐDQGௐWHFKௐVXSSRUWௐௐ ௐௐGD\VௐDௐ\HDUௐWRௐ HQGௐXVHUVௐDQGௐGLVWULEXWRUௐVHUYLFHௐJURXSVௐௐ'HSHQGLQJௐXSRQௐWKHௐLVVXHௐPDQ\ௐFDQௐEHௐKDQGOHGௐRYHUௐWKHௐ SKRQHௐZLWKௐPLQRUௐDGMXVWPHQWVௐWRௐHLWKHUௐWKHௐRSHUDWRU¶VௐXVHௐRIௐWKHௐHTXLSPHQWௐRUௐWRௐWKHௐPDFKLQHௐLWVHOIௐௐ 2XUௐVXSSRUWௐVSHFLDOLVWVௐKDYHௐH[WHQVLYHௐH[SHULHQFHௐLQௐWURXEOHVKRRWLQJௐLVVXHVௐDQGௐRIIHULQJௐVROXWLRQVௐௐ ,IௐUHSDLUௐVHUYLFHௐDQGௐSDUWVௐDUHௐUHTXLUHGௐRXUௐVSHFLDOLVWVௐZLOOௐZRUNௐZLWKௐWKHௐFXVWRPHUௐDQGRUௐGHDOHUௐWRௐ PRVWௐTXLFNO\ௐDQGௐHDVLO\ௐUHPHG\ௐWKHௐVLWXDWLRQௐௐ7RௐDVVLVWௐLQௐWKLVௐSURFHVVௐHDFKௐXQLWௐZHௐEXLOGௐLVௐDVVLJQHGௐ DௐௐGLJLWௐVHULDOௐQXPEHUௐWKDWௐDOORZVௐXVௐWRௐUHWULHYHௐHOHFWURQLFௐFRSLHVௐRIௐHYHU\ௐGRFXPHQWௐUHODWHGௐWRௐWKHௐ V\VWHPௐIURPௐWKHௐVDOHVௐRUGHUௐWRௐSURGXFWௐPDQXDOVௐWKDWௐFRQWDLQௐDVௐEXLOWௐZLULQJௐGLDJUDPVௐDQGௐK\GUDXOLFௐ VFKHPDWLFVௐௐ
:HௐVWRFNௐDQௐH[WHQVLYHௐLQYHQWRU\ௐRIௐUHSDLUௐSDUWVௐDQGௐDFFHVVRULHVௐWRௐJLYHௐH[SHGLWHGௐVHUYLFHௐWRௐRXUௐ FXVWRPHUVௐௐ'XHௐWRௐRXUௐVWRFNௐOHYHOVௐDQGௐVWDQGDUGL]DWLRQௐRQௐPRVWௐEX\ௐRXWௐFRPSRQHQWVௐZHௐKDYHௐDௐWUDFNௐ UHFRUGௐRIௐFRQVLVWHQWO\ௐVKLSSLQJௐ
ௐSDUWVௐWKHௐVDPHௐGD\ௐRUGHUHGௐௐ)RUௐWKRVHௐUHPDLQLQJௐSDUWVௐZHௐJRௐ WRௐRXUௐYHQGRUௐVXSSOLHUVௐIRUௐVXSSRUWௐWRௐPHHWௐRXUௐFXVWRPHUௐDQGௐGHDOHUௐQHWZRUNௐQHHGVௐௐ ,QௐUHJDUGௐWRௐUHVSRQVHௐWLPHௐPRVWௐFXVWRPHUVௐFDQௐH[SHFWௐDௐSHUVRQDOௐYLVLWௐIURPௐDௐGHDOHUௐWHFKQLFLDQௐZLWKLQௐ ௐKRXUVௐZLWKௐVRPHௐH[FHSWLRQVௐGXHௐWRௐJHRJUDSKLFௐFKDOOHQJHVௐௐ$VௐGHWDLOHGௐDERYHௐWHFKQLFDOௐSKRQHௐ VXSSRUWௐLVௐDYDLODEOHௐDOOௐGD\ௐHYHU\ௐGD\
'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐDELOLW\ௐDQGௐZLOOLQJQHVVௐWRௐSURYLGHௐ\RXUௐ SURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐ
HQWLWLHVௐLQௐWKHௐ8QLWHGௐ6WDWHV
$OOௐSHUVRQQHOௐSK\VLFDOௐDVVHWVௐDQGௐSURFHGXUHVௐDUHௐDOUHDG\ௐLQௐSODFHௐWRௐSURYLGHௐRXUௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐSURGXFWௐ VXSSRUWௐQDWLRQZLGH
'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐDELOLW\ௐDQGௐZLOOLQJQHVVௐWRௐSURYLGHௐ\RXUௐ SURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐ
HQWLWLHVௐLQௐ&DQDGD
:HௐDUHௐSUHSDUHGௐDQGௐKDYHௐDOUHDG\ௐXWLOL]HGௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐFRQWUDFWௐLQௐ&DQDGDௐIRUௐDௐVXEVWDQWLDOௐ WUDQVDFWLRQௐZLWKௐ+DPLOWRQௐ2QWDULRௐ
ௐ+\GUR([FDYDWRUௐWUXFNV
,GHQWLI\ௐDQ\ௐJHRJUDSKLFௐDUHDVௐRIௐWKHௐ8QLWHGௐ6WDWHVௐ
RUௐ&DQDGDௐWKDWௐ\RXௐZLOOௐ127ௐEHௐIXOO\ௐVHUYLQJௐWKURXJKௐ
WKHௐSURSRVHGௐFRQWUDFW
+DZDLLௐLVௐWKHௐRQO\ௐJHRJUDSK\ௐQRWௐFRYHUHGௐE\ௐDQௐH[FOXVLYHௐGLVWULEXWRUௐEXWௐZHௐGRௐXWLOL]HௐDௐQRQH[FOXVLYHௐ UHVHOOHUௐWRௐIDFLOLWDWHௐVHUYLFHௐLVVXHVௐDQGௐWKHௐIHZௐVDOHVௐWKDWௐZHௐVHHௐWKHUH
,GHQWLI\ௐDQ\ௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLW\ௐVHFWRUVௐ
LHௐJRYHUQPHQWௐHGXFDWLRQௐQRWIRUSURILW
ௐWKDWௐ\RXௐ
ZLOOௐ127ௐEHௐIXOO\ௐVHUYLQJௐWKURXJKௐWKHௐSURSRVHGௐ
FRQWUDFWௐ([SODLQௐLQௐGHWDLOௐ)RUௐH[DPSOHௐGRHVௐ\RXUௐ
FRPSDQ\ௐKDYHௐRQO\ௐDௐUHJLRQDOௐSUHVHQFHௐRUௐGRௐRWKHUௐ
FRRSHUDWLYHௐSXUFKDVLQJௐFRQWUDFWVௐOLPLWௐ\RXUௐDELOLW\ௐWRௐ SURPRWHௐDQRWKHUௐFRQWUDFW"
$OWKRXJKௐZHௐDUHௐZLOOLQJௐDQGௐDEOHௐWRௐVHUYHௐDOOௐVHFWRUVௐ
ௐRIௐRXUௐFXVWRPHUVௐIDOOௐLQௐWKHௐJRYHUQPHQWௐ
VHJPHQWௐZLWKௐVRPHௐWULEDOௐHQWLWLHVௐDQGௐDQௐRFFDVLRQDOௐVFKRROௐGLVWULFWௐRUௐXQLYHUVLW\ௐPL[HGௐLQ
'HILQHௐDQ\ௐVSHFLILFௐFRQWUDFWௐUHTXLUHPHQWVௐRUௐ
UHVWULFWLRQVௐWKDWௐZRXOGௐDSSO\ௐWRௐRXUௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐ
HQWLWLHVௐLQௐ+DZDLLௐDQGௐ$ODVNDௐDQGௐLQௐ86ௐ7HUULWRULHV
:HௐGRௐQRWௐKDYHௐDQ\ௐUHVWULFWLRQVௐLQௐUHJDUGVௐWRௐWKHௐFRQWUDFWௐIRUௐWKHௐ6WDWHVௐRIௐ$ODVNDௐDQGௐ+DZDLL
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 7DEOH
0DUNHWLQJ3ODQ
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐPDUNHWLQJௐVWUDWHJ\ௐIRUௐSURPRWLQJௐ
WKLVௐFRQWUDFWௐRSSRUWXQLW\ௐௐ8SORDGௐ
UHSUHVHQWDWLYHௐVDPSOHVௐRIௐ\RXUௐPDUNHWLQJௐ
PDWHULDOVௐ
LIௐDSSOLFDEOH
ௐLQௐWKHௐGRFXPHQWௐ
XSORDGௐVHFWLRQௐRIௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVH
ௐௐௐௐ3URGXFWௐ/LWHUDWXUH
ௐ:HௐGLVSOD\ௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐFRQWUDFWௐDZDUGHGௐORJRௐRQௐRXUௐSURGXFWௐOLQHௐFDUGVௐSURGXFWௐ FDWDORJVௐDQGௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐௐ6HHௐVXSSRUWLQJௐGRFXPHQWௐ³6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ&RௐRIௐ$PHULFDௐ)XOOௐ3URGXFWௐ/LQHௐ &DWDORJ´ௐ
ௐௐௐௐ:HEVLWH
ௐ:HௐZLOOௐKLJKOLJKWௐWKLVௐLQௐRXUௐZHEVLWHௐEORJௐFRQWHQWௐZKHQௐDZDUGHGௐDQGௐKLJKOLJKWௐRQௐRXUௐVRFLDOௐ SODWIRUPVௐ
ௐௐௐௐ0DJD]LQHV
ௐ&ROODERUDWHௐZLWKௐ,QGXVWU\ௐ3DUWQHUVௐDQGௐ7UDGHௐ3XEOLFDWLRQVௐDGYHUWLVHௐDQGௐZULWHௐDUWLFOHVௐ KLJKOLJKWLQJௐWKHௐEHQHILWVௐRIௐXWLOL]LQJௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFW ௐௐௐௐ7UDLQLQJௐRQௐ)LQDQFHௐ2SWLRQV
ௐௐ3URPRWHௐWKHௐXVHௐRIௐWKHௐ&RQWUDFWௐDQGௐ)LQDQFHௐ2SWLRQVௐGXULQJௐRXUௐ\HDUO\ௐ 'HDOHUௐ0HHWLQJV
ௐௐௐௐ0DLQௐ3KRQHௐ/LQH
ௐ2XUௐRQKROGௐPHVVDJHௐIRUௐRXUௐPDLQௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐSKRQHௐOLQHௐLQFOXGHVௐDௐQDUUDWLYHௐ GHVFULELQJௐWKHௐFRQWUDFWௐDQGௐEHQHILWVௐWRௐRXUௐFXVWRPHUVௐ ௐௐௐௐ7UDGHVKRZV
ௐ:HௐGLVSOD\ௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐIODJVEDQQHUVௐDWௐWKHௐPDMRUௐLQGXVWU\ௐVKRZVௐDQGௐRXUௐGLVWULEXWLRQௐ
GHDOHU
ௐSDUWQHUVௐGRௐDVௐZHOOௐDWௐGR]HQVௐRIௐORFDOௐVKRZVௐHDFKௐ\HDUௐ ௐௐௐௐ)LHOG
ௐ2XUௐWKUHHௐUHJLRQDOௐVDOHVௐPDQDJHUVௐQDWLRQDOௐVDOHVௐPDQDJHUௐDQGௐGHPRQVWUDWLRQௐVSHFLDOLVWVௐSURPRWHௐ WKHௐFRQWUDFWௐDWௐLQௐSHUVRQௐFXVWRPHUௐYLVLWVௐDQGௐGHPRQVWUDWLRQVௐ7UDLOLQJௐKDVௐDOVRௐEHHQௐSURYLGHGௐWRௐRXUௐ GLVWULEXWLRQௐ
GHDOHU
ௐSDUWQHUVௐRQௐKRZௐWRௐDOVRௐSURPRWHௐWKHௐFRQWUDFWௐLQௐWKHௐILHOG
'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐXVHௐRIௐWHFKQRORJ\ௐDQGௐGLJLWDOௐ
GDWDௐ
HJௐVRFLDOௐPHGLDௐPHWDGDWDௐXVDJH
ௐWRௐ
HQKDQFHௐPDUNHWLQJௐHIIHFWLYHQHVV
2XUௐPDUNHWLQJௐSODWIRUPVௐLQFOXGH
ௐRXUௐZHEVLWHVௐ
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐDQGௐ5RFNௐ5HQWDO
ௐDGௐFDPSDLJQVௐWKURXJKௐ
*RRJOHௐ$G:RUGVௐ/LQNHG,QௐDGVௐDQGௐ)DFHERRNௐDGVௐVRFLDOௐPHGLDௐSODWIRUPVௐVXFKௐDVௐ/LQNHG,Qௐ)DFHERRNௐDQGௐ 7ZLWWHUௐDGYHUWLVLQJௐDQGௐHGLWRULDOௐFRQWHQWௐZLWKௐWUDGHௐPDJD]LQHVௐDQGௐHPDLOௐFDPSDLJQVௐWRௐHVWDEOLVKHGௐGHDOHUௐ QHWZRUNVௐDQGௐFXVWRPHUV
,Qௐ\RXUௐYLHZௐZKDWௐLVௐ6RXUFHZHOO¶VௐUROHௐLQௐ
SURPRWLQJௐFRQWUDFWVௐDULVLQJௐRXWௐRIௐWKLVௐ5)3"ௐ
+RZௐZLOOௐ\RXௐLQWHJUDWHௐDௐ6RXUFHZHOODZDUGHGௐ
FRQWUDFWௐLQWRௐ\RXUௐVDOHVௐSURFHVV"
:HௐIHHOௐWKDWௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSURYLGHVௐWKHௐPHGLXPௐDQGௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐVXSSOLHVௐWKHௐSURGXFWௐERWKௐVXSSO\LQJௐ SURVSHFWVௐௐ6RXUFHZHOO¶VௐPDUNHWLQJௐHIIRUWVௐDUHௐLPSRUWDQWௐWRௐH[SRVHௐPXQLFLSDOLWLHVௐWRௐWKHௐFRQWUDFWௐDQGௐWKHௐ DFFHSWHGௐRSWLRQௐDVௐDQௐDOWHUQDWLYHௐWRௐWKHௐWUDGLWLRQDOௐELGௐSURFHVVௐௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQW¶VௐUHVSRQVLELOLW\ௐLVௐWRௐ PDUNHWௐRXUௐSURGXFWௐWRௐSURVSHFWVௐDQGௐRXUௐGLVWULEXWLRQௐQHWZRUNௐ ,QWHJUDWHௐ,QWRௐ6DOHVௐ3URFHVV
ௐௐௐௐ:HௐZLOOௐFRQWLQXHௐZLWKௐRXUௐH[LVWLQJௐSODQௐZKLFKௐLVௐPHQWLRQHGௐLQௐQXPEHUௐௐDERYHௐௐ,QௐDGGLWLRQௐWRௐZKDWௐLVௐ PHQWLRQHGௐZHௐKDYHௐDGGLWLRQDOௐSODQVௐDOUHDG\ௐLQௐSODFHௐWKDWௐZHௐZLOOௐFRQWLQXHௐZLWKௐWKDWௐLQFOXGH ௐ
Rௐௐௐௐ::(77ௐVKRZௐ,QGLDQDSROLVௐ)HEUXDU\ௐ
ௐDQQRXQFHௐUHQHZDOௐRIௐFRQWUDFWௐDWௐDQQXDOௐGHDOHUௐPHHWLQJ Rௐௐௐௐ(DFKௐ\HDUௐZHௐSUHVHQWௐWKHௐWRSௐௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐGHDOHUௐVDOHVSHUVRQVௐZLWKௐPRQHWDU\ௐDZDUGVௐFRYHUHGௐE\ௐ 6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ
Rௐௐௐௐ2XUௐVHFXUHGௐGHDOHUௐSRUWDOௐZHEVLWHௐLQFOXGHV
ௐDOOௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSULFLQJௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐTXLFNௐVWDUWௐJXLGHௐZKLFKௐ RXWOLQHVௐDOOௐSHUWLQHQWௐGHWDLOVௐRIௐRXUௐFRQWUDFW
Rௐௐௐௐ,QWHUQDOௐTXDUWHUO\ௐVDOHVௐPHHWLQJௐLQFOXGHVௐXSGDWHௐRQௐVDOHVௐVXFFHVVௐUHJDUGLQJௐWKHௐFRQWUDFW Rௐௐௐௐ:KHQௐDௐQHZௐGHDOHUௐLVௐEURXJKWௐRQௐZHௐDOORFDWHௐIRUௐௐKRXUௐRIௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐWUDLQLQJ
$UHௐ\RXUௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐVHUYLFHVௐDYDLODEOHௐ
WKURXJKௐDQௐHSURFXUHPHQWௐRUGHULQJௐSURFHVV"ௐ,Iௐ
VRௐGHVFULEHௐ\RXUௐHSURFXUHPHQWௐV\VWHPௐDQGௐ
KRZௐJRYHUQPHQWDOௐDQGௐHGXFDWLRQDOௐFXVWRPHUVௐ
KDYHௐXVHGௐLW
:HௐGRௐQRWௐKDYHௐDQௐHSURFXUHPHQWௐV\VWHPௐLQௐSODFHௐDWௐWKLVௐWLPH
7DEOH
9DOXH$GGHG$WWULEXWHV
/LQH,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐSURGXFWௐHTXLSPHQWௐ
PDLQWHQDQFHௐRUௐRSHUDWRUௐWUDLQLQJௐ
SURJUDPVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐRIIHUௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ
SDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHVௐ,QFOXGHௐGHWDLOVௐVXFKௐ
DVௐZKHWKHUௐWUDLQLQJௐLVௐVWDQGDUGௐRUௐ
RSWLRQDOௐZKRௐSURYLGHVௐWUDLQLQJௐDQGௐDQ\ௐ
FRVWVௐWKDWௐDSSO\
2SHUDWLRQDOௐWUDLQLQJௐLVௐVWDQGDUGௐDQGௐSURYLGHGௐIUHHௐRIௐFKDUJHௐE\ௐRXUௐGLVWULEXWRUVௐDWௐWLPHௐRIௐGHOLYHU\ௐRIௐQHZௐ PDFKLQHVௐௐ%HFDXVHௐDௐODUJHௐSHUFHQWDJHௐRIௐRXUௐFXVWRPHUVௐDUHௐUHSHDWௐEX\HUVௐZHௐFKRRVHௐWRௐRIIHUௐDGGLWLRQDOௐRQ VLWHௐRSHUDWRUௐWUDLQLQJௐE\ௐDௐIDFWRU\ௐUHSUHVHQWDWLYHௐRQௐDQௐRSWLRQDOௐEDVLVௐIRUௐWKRVHௐWKDWௐIHHOௐWKH\ௐQHHGௐLWௐௐ3ULFHௐLVௐ
ௐIRUௐWKHௐILUVWௐGD\ௐDQGௐௐIRUௐHDFKௐVXEVHTXHQWௐGD\ௐLQFOXGLQJௐDOOௐH[SHQVHVௐVXFKௐDVௐWUDQVSRUWDWLRQ 0RGHOௐVSHFLILFௐPDLQWHQDQFHௐWUDLQLQJௐLVௐRSWLRQDOௐFXVWRPL]DEOHௐDQGௐDYDLODEOHௐRQௐGHPDQGௐௐ7KLVௐFRYHUVௐGDLO\ௐ ZHHNO\ௐPRQWKO\ௐDQGௐDQQXDOௐPDLQWHQDQFHௐUHTXLUHPHQWVௐDVௐZHOOௐDVௐEDVLFௐDQGௐPRGHOௐVSHFLILFௐWURXEOHVKRRWLQJௐௐ 7KLVௐLVௐW\SLFDOO\ௐௐGD\VௐDWௐRXUௐSODQWௐDQGௐLVௐ
ௐSHUௐSHUVRQௐௐ0HDOVௐDQGௐORGJLQJௐDUHௐLQFOXGHGௐLQௐWKHௐSULFHௐDQGௐ FXVWRPHUௐLVௐUHVSRQVLEOHௐIRUௐWUDQVSRUWDWLRQ
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐWHFKQRORJLFDOௐDGYDQFHVௐWKDWௐ
\RXUௐSURSRVHGௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐVHUYLFHVௐRIIHU
2XUௐSULPDU\ௐ³DGYDQFHPHQW´ௐUHYROYHVௐDURXQGௐWKHௐSULQFLSOHௐRIௐNHHSLQJௐRXUௐV\VWHPVௐVLPSOHௐௐ3DUWLFXODUO\ௐLQௐWKHௐ FRPELQDWLRQௐWUXFNௐK\GURௐH[FDYDWRUௐDQGௐIXOOVL]HௐWUXFNௐMHWௐPDUNHWௐQHDUO\ௐHYHU\ௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐKDVௐPRYHGௐWRௐ PLFURSURFHVVRUFRQWUROOHGௐPRGXOHVௐWKDWௐLQFRUSRUDWHௐWRXFKௐVFUHHQVௐDQGௐFRPSOH[ௐGLJLWDOௐXVHUௐLQWHUIDFHVௐௐ:HௐKDYHௐ UHWDLQHGௐWKHௐXVHௐRIௐWUDGLWLRQDOௐYROWௐFRQWUROௐV\VWHPVௐௐ7KLVௐPDNHVௐRXUௐWUXFNVௐHDVLHUௐDQGௐVDIHUௐWRௐUXQௐHDVLHUௐWRௐ PDLQWDLQௐZLWKRXWௐVSHFLDOௐWUDLQLQJௐDQGௐWRROVௐ
LQFUHDVLQJௐXSWLPH
ௐDQGௐHOLPLQDWHVௐWKHௐREVROHVFHQFHௐDQGௐIUDJLOLW\ௐRIௐ
KLJKWHFKௐFRPSRQHQWV
:HௐDUHௐLQௐWKHௐSURFHVVௐRIௐPDQXIDFWXULQJௐWKHௐZRUOG¶VௐRQO\ௐEDWWHU\ௐSRZHUHGௐURGGHUௐIRUௐWKHௐ&LW\ௐRIௐ6HDWWOHௐVHZHUௐ FROOHFWLRQVௐGHSDUWPHQWௐௐௐ
7KHௐ*HQHVLVௐ5HF\FOLQJௐ&RPELQDWLRQௐWUXFNௐLVௐDQௐH[FOXVLYHௐSDUWQHUVKLSௐZLWKௐ&DSSHOORWWRௐRIௐ,WDO\ௐWKDWௐDOORZVௐXVௐWRௐ RIIHUௐWKHLUௐZRUOGௐOHDGLQJௐWHFKQRORJ\ௐRIௐWKLVௐSURGXFWௐLQௐ1RUWKௐ$PHULFDௐZLWKௐWKHௐVDOHVௐHIIRUWVௐDQGௐVXSSRUWௐRIௐRXUௐ QDWLRQZLGHௐGHDOHUௐQHWZRUN
2XUௐSDWHQWHGௐ+\GURௐ'ULYHௐV\VWHPௐXWLOL]HGௐRQௐRXUௐ
(&2ௐGULYHVௐRXUௐEORZHUௐDQGௐZDWHUௐSXPSௐLQௐDௐYHU\ௐXQLTXHௐ EXWௐVXUSULVLQJO\ௐVLPSOHௐPDQQHUௐWKDWௐRIIHUVௐDௐKRVWௐRIௐEHQHILWVௐௐ(OLPLQDWLQJௐWKHௐWUDQVIHUௐFDVHௐSUHVHQWௐLQௐPRVWௐ RWKHUௐGHVLJQVௐUHPRYHVௐDௐSRWHQWLDOௐPDLQWHQDQFHௐKHDGDFKHௐDOORZVௐRXUௐWUXFNௐWRௐZRUNௐLQௐQHXWUDOௐRIIHULQJௐ XQPDWFKHGௐRSHUDWRUௐVDIHW\ௐDQGௐHDVHௐRIௐVHWXSௐDQGௐFRQVXPHVௐOHVVௐKRUVHSRZHUௐWKXVௐFXWWLQJௐIXHOௐFRQVXPSWLRQௐ DQGௐHPLVVLRQV
7KHௐ+3579ௐ6HULHVௐ,9ௐZDVௐUHFHQWO\ௐUHILQHGௐDQGௐLVௐWKHௐPRVWௐXVHUௐIULHQGO\ௐDQGௐSURGXFWLYHௐ79-HWௐFRPELQDWLRQௐ V\VWHPVௐLQௐWKHௐWUXFNௐDQGௐWUDLOHUௐPDUNHWௐDOORZLQJௐFXVWRPHUVௐWRௐ79ௐDQGௐFOHDQௐVHZHUௐOLQHVௐVLPXOWDQHRXVO\
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐ³JUHHQ´ௐLQLWLDWLYHVௐWKDWௐUHODWHௐ
WRௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐRUௐWRௐ\RXUௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐ
VHUYLFHVௐDQGௐLQFOXGHௐDௐOLVWௐRIௐWKHௐ
FHUWLI\LQJௐDJHQF\ௐIRUௐHDFK
&RPSDQ\
ௐVRODUௐSDQHOௐSURMHFWௐ
7KURXJKௐWKHௐ,OOLQRLVௐ$GMXVWDEOHௐ%ORFNௐ3URJUDPௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQW¶VௐௐN:ௐVRODUௐV\VWHPௐLVௐJHQHUDWLQJௐௐ 5(&¶Vௐ
5HQHZDEOHௐ(QHUJ\ௐ&UHGLWV
ௐௐ
DWWDFKPHQWௐ±ௐௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ6RODUௐ5HQHZDEOH«ௐDQGௐDWWDFKPHQWௐௐ ௐ,OOLQRLVௐ$GMXVWDEOH«
ௐௐ
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐSDUWLFLSDWHGௐLQௐ&RP(G¶Vௐ6PDUWௐ,QYHUWHUௐUHEDWHௐSURJUDPௐZKLFKௐLQFHQWLYL]HVௐQRQUHVLGHQWLDOௐ FXVWRPHUVௐWRௐPDNHௐUHQHZDEOHௐHQHUJ\ௐLQYHVWPHQWVௐ
DWWDFKPHQWௐ±ௐௐ6PDUWௐ,QYHUWHU«
ௐௐ
7RௐGDWHௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQW¶VௐVRODUௐFKDUJLQJௐV\VWHPௐKDVௐVDYHGௐ&2ௐHPLVVLRQVௐRIௐ
ௐOEVௐ
DWWDFKPHQWௐௐ
6RODUௐ(GJHௐVXPPDU\
ௐ
%DWWHU\ௐSRZHUHGௐIRUNOLIWVௐDQGௐPDWHULDOௐKDQGOLQJௐGHYLFHVௐXWLOL]HௐVRODUௐFKDUJLQJ $GRSWLRQௐRIௐORZௐ92&ௐSDLQWVௐKDVௐGHFUHDVHGௐRYHUDOOௐ92&ௐJHQHUDWLRQௐGHVSLWHௐDௐIROGௐLQFUHDVHௐLQௐSURGXFWLRQௐLQௐ WKHௐODVWௐௐ\HDUV
,QVWDOODWLRQௐRIௐDௐZDWHUௐUHFLUFXODWLRQௐV\VWHPௐIRUௐMHWWHUௐWHVWLQJௐVDYLQJௐKXQGUHGVௐRIௐWKRXVDQGVௐRIௐJDOORQVௐSHUௐ\HDU 5HF\FOLQJௐ3URJUDP
8WLOL]DWLRQௐRIௐUHXVDEOHௐVWHHOௐWUDQVSRUWௐVNLGVௐIRUௐRXUௐORFDOO\ௐVRXUFHGௐODUJHௐFRPSRQHQWVௐHOLPLQDWHVௐWKHௐQHHGௐIRUௐRQH XVHௐZRRGௐDQGௐSODVWLFௐVNLGV
5HF\FOLQJௐRIௐZRRGௐDQGௐFDUGERDUGௐVKLSSLQJௐFRPSRQHQWV
3ODQWZLGHௐSDSHUௐDQGௐSODVWLFௐUHF\FOLQJௐSURJUDP
3URGXFWV
7KHௐ*HQHVLVௐUHF\FOHUௐFRPERௐWUXFNௐFDQௐFOHDQௐVHZHUVௐDOOௐGD\ௐZLWKRXWௐXVLQJௐDௐGURSௐRIௐIUHVKௐZDWHUௐௐ,WௐSURFHVVHVௐ WKHௐGHEULVௐDQGௐZDWHUௐWKDWௐLVௐYDFXXPHGௐGXULQJௐWKHௐRSHUDWLQJௐSURFHVVௐXVLQJௐWKHௐUHFODLPHGௐZDWHUௐIRUௐMHWWLQJ 2XUௐ
(&2ௐWUXFNௐ+35(&2ௐWUXFNௐDQGௐ(&2ௐWUDLOHUௐRSHUDWLQJௐV\VWHPௐDOORZVௐWKHௐHQJLQHௐWRௐRSHUDWHௐDWௐ ௐORZHUௐVSHHGௐZKLOHௐLQௐWKHௐZRUNௐPRGHௐRIIHULQJௐUHGXFWLRQVௐLQௐIXHOௐXVHௐHPLVVLRQVௐDQGௐDPELHQWௐQRLVH 2XUௐURGGHUVௐDUHௐWKHௐRQO\ௐFRPPRQO\ௐDFFHSWHGௐZDWHUOHVVௐVHZHUௐFOHDQLQJௐWRROVௐPDNLQJௐWKHPௐSRSXODUௐLQௐDULGௐ UHJLRQVௐZKHUHௐZDWHUௐFRQVHUYDWLRQௐLVௐRIௐLPSRUWDQFHௐௐ7KRXVDQGVௐRIௐJDOORQVௐRIௐZDWHUௐDUHௐVDYHGௐGDLO\ௐYHUVXVௐ WUDGLWLRQDOௐVHZHUௐMHWYDFௐWHFKQRORJ\ௐ
$OWKRXJKௐWUDGLWLRQDOO\ௐJDVௐSRZHUHGௐZHௐKDYHௐQRZௐGHYHORSHGௐDௐEDWWHU\ௐSRZHUHGௐURGGHU %LRGHJUDGDEOHௐK\GUDXOLFௐIOXLGௐLVௐRIIHUHGௐDVௐDQௐRSWLRQௐLQௐDOOௐRXUௐV\VWHPV :HௐKDYHௐPDQXIDFWXUHGௐVHYHUDOௐ&1*ௐSRZHUHGௐMHWௐWUXFNVௐIRUௐWKHௐ6RXWKHUQௐ&DOLIRUQLDௐ0DUNHW
,GHQWLI\ௐDQ\ௐWKLUGSDUW\ௐLVVXHGௐHFRODEHOVௐ
UDWLQJVௐRUௐFHUWLILFDWLRQVௐWKDWௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐ
KDVௐUHFHLYHGௐIRUௐWKHௐHTXLSPHQWௐRUௐ
SURGXFWVௐLQFOXGHGௐLQௐ\RXUௐ3URSRVDOௐUHODWHGௐ
WRௐHQHUJ\ௐHIILFLHQF\ௐRUௐFRQVHUYDWLRQௐOLIH
F\FOHௐGHVLJQௐ
FUDGOHWRFUDGOH
ௐRUௐRWKHUௐ
JUHHQVXVWDLQDELOLW\ௐIDFWRUV
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐKDVௐQRWௐUHFHLYHGௐDQ\ௐWKLUGSDUW\ௐ(&2ௐUDWLQJVௐVSHFLILFDOO\ௐௐ+RZHYHUௐDௐSDWHQWௐKDVௐEHHQௐ JUDQWHGௐE\ௐWKHௐ86ௐ3DWHQWௐRIILFHௐIRUௐRXUௐ+\GUR'ULYHௐV\VWHPௐGHVFULEHGௐDERYHௐDVௐXVHGௐRQௐRXUௐ (&2ௐௐ7KLVௐ
V\VWHPௐGRHVௐSURYLGHௐIXHOௐVDYLQJௐYVௐWUDGLWLRQDOௐGULYHௐV\VWHPVௐௐ $WWDFKPHQWௐௐ+\GUR'ULYH«
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐ:RPHQௐRUௐ0LQRULW\ௐ
%XVLQHVVௐ(QWLW\ௐ
:0%(
ௐ6PDOOௐ%XVLQHVVௐ
(QWLW\ௐ
6%(
ௐRUௐYHWHUDQௐRZQHGௐEXVLQHVVௐ
FHUWLILFDWLRQVௐWKDWௐ\RXUௐFRPSDQ\ௐRUௐKXEௐ
SDUWQHUVௐKDYHௐREWDLQHGௐ8SORDGௐ
GRFXPHQWDWLRQௐRIௐFHUWLILFDWLRQௐ
DVௐ
DSSOLFDEOH
ௐLQௐWKHௐGRFXPHQWௐXSORDGௐ
VHFWLRQௐRIௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVH
:HௐFRQWLQXHௐWRௐUHFHLYHௐWKHௐ('*(ௐFUHGLWௐIURPௐWKHௐ6WDWHௐRIௐ,OOLQRLVௐ7KLVௐFUHGLWௐLVௐEDVHGௐRQௐWKHௐQXPEHUௐRIௐMREVௐ FUHDWHGௐDQGௐUHWDLQHGௐ
$WWDFKPHQWௐௐ(GJHௐ&UHGLW««
:KDWௐXQLTXHௐDWWULEXWHVௐGRHVௐ\RXUௐ
FRPSDQ\ௐ\RXUௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐ\RXUௐVHUYLFHVௐ
RIIHUௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHV"ௐ
:KDWௐPDNHVௐ\RXUௐSURSRVHGௐVROXWLRQVௐ
XQLTXHௐLQௐ\RXUௐLQGXVWU\ௐDVௐLWௐDSSOLHVௐWRௐ
6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHV"
2QHௐRIௐWKHௐPRVWௐXQLTXHௐDWWULEXWHVௐRIௐRXUௐRIIHULQJௐLVௐRXUௐXQSUHFHGHQWHGௐEUHDGWKௐRIௐSURGXFWௐௐ1RௐRWKHUௐ PDQXIDFWXUHUௐLQௐRXUௐPDUNHWSODFHௐRIIHUVௐHYHU\WKLQJௐIURPௐVPDOOௐMHWWHUVௐXVHGௐLQௐWKHௐSOXPELQJௐVHJPHQWௐWRௐIXOOௐVL]Hௐ FRPERௐWUXFNVௐDQGௐHYHU\WKLQJௐLQௐEHWZHHQௐௐ7KLVௐPHDQVௐWKDWௐRXUௐGLVWULEXWRUVௐFDQVௐEHௐFRQVXOWDQWVௐVWDUWLQJௐZLWKௐ DVVHVVLQJௐDௐFXVWRPHU¶VௐQHHGVௐDQGௐWKHQௐVXSSO\LQJௐWKHௐSURSHUௐSURGXFWௐ7KLVௐDOVRௐPDNHVௐXVௐRQHௐRIௐWKHௐRQO\ௐ VXSSOLHUVௐRIௐVPDOOHUௐSURGXFWVௐLQௐWKHௐVHZHUௐLQGXVWU\ௐWKDWௐKDVௐDௐVWURQJௐQDWLRQZLGHௐVDOHVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHௐQHWZRUN
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 7DEOH
$
:DUUDQW\
'HVFULEHLQGHWDLO\RXUPDQXIDFWXUHUZDUUDQW\SURJUDPLQFOXGLQJFRQGLWLRQVDQGUHTXLUHPHQWVWRTXDOLI\FODLPVSURFHGXUHDQGRYHUDOOVWUXFWXUH<RX PD\XSORDGUHSUHVHQWDWLYHVDPSOHVRI\RXUZDUUDQW\PDWHULDOV LIDSSOLFDEOH
LQWKHGRFXPHQWXSORDGVHFWLRQRI\RXUUHVSRQVHLQDGGLWLRQWR UHVSRQGLQJWRWKHTXHVWLRQVEHORZ
/LQH,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
'Rௐ\RXUௐZDUUDQWLHVௐFRYHUௐDOOௐSURGXFWVௐSDUWVௐDQGௐODERU" 6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQW¶VௐVWDQGDUGௐZDUUDQW\ௐSROLF\ௐFRYHUVௐDOOௐLWHPVௐPDQXIDFWXUHGௐE\ௐ6HZHUௐ (TXLSPHQWௐH[FHSWௐIRUௐZHDUௐLWHPVௐௐ0DQ\ௐPDMRUௐFRPSRQHQWVௐDUHௐFRYHUHGௐE\ௐWKHLUௐUHVSHFWLYHௐ PDQXIDFWXUHVௐZDUUDQW\ௐSROLF\ௐௐ
$WWDFKPHQWௐௐ:DUUDQW\ௐ3ROLF\««
'Rௐ\RXUௐZDUUDQWLHVௐLPSRVHௐXVDJHௐUHVWULFWLRQVௐRUௐRWKHUௐ OLPLWDWLRQVௐWKDWௐDGYHUVHO\ௐDIIHFWௐFRYHUDJH"
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQW¶VௐVWDQGDUGௐZDUUDQW\ௐSROLF\ௐFRYHUVௐௐPRQWKVௐRUௐXVHௐRUௐௐKRXUVௐௐ7KHௐ ௐKRXUVௐOLPLWௐFRYHUVௐW\SLFDOௐXVDJHௐE\ௐDOOௐ0XQLFLSDOLWLHV
'Rௐ\RXUௐZDUUDQWLHVௐFRYHUௐWKHௐH[SHQVHௐRIௐWHFKQLFLDQV¶ௐWUDYHOௐ WLPHௐDQGௐPLOHDJHௐWRௐSHUIRUPௐZDUUDQW\ௐUHSDLUV"
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐSURYLGHVௐXSௐWRௐௐKRXUVௐRIௐWUDYHOௐWLPHௐIRUௐZDUUDQW\ௐUHLPEXUVHPHQWௐௐ2XUௐ 'HDOHUVௐSLFNௐXSௐWUDYHOௐWLPHௐLQௐDGGLWLRQௐWRௐWKHௐௐKRXUVௐDVௐQHHGHGௐௐ2XUௐ0XQLFLSDOௐFXVWRPHUVௐ GRௐQRWௐKDYHௐWRௐSD\ௐIRUௐWUDYHOௐWLPHௐUHJDUGOHVVௐRIௐZKHUHௐWKH\ௐDUHௐORFDWHG
$UHௐWKHUHௐDQ\ௐJHRJUDSKLFௐUHJLRQVௐRIௐWKHௐ8QLWHGௐ6WDWHVௐRUௐ &DQDGDௐ
DVௐDSSOLFDEOH
ௐIRUௐZKLFKௐ\RXௐFDQQRWௐSURYLGHௐDௐ
FHUWLILHGௐWHFKQLFLDQௐWRௐSHUIRUPௐZDUUDQW\ௐUHSDLUV"ௐௐ+RZௐZLOOௐ 6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHVௐLQௐWKHVHௐUHJLRQVௐEHௐSURYLGHGௐ VHUYLFHௐIRUௐZDUUDQW\ௐUHSDLU"
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐKDVௐGHDOHUVௐWKDWௐFRYHUௐௐRIௐ6WDWHVௐLQௐWKHௐ86ௐௐ,Qௐ&DQDGDௐZHௐKDYHௐ GHDOHUVௐFXUUHQWO\ௐFRYHULQJௐௐ3URYLGHQFHVௐௐ2XUௐGHDOHUVௐFRYHUௐVHUYLFHௐLQௐWKHVHௐDUHDVௐௐ)RUௐ FXVWRPHUௐLQௐRWKHUௐVWDWHVௐRUௐSURYLGHQFHVௐLQௐ&DQDGDௐZHௐKDYHௐWZRௐRSWLRQVௐIRUௐVHUYLFHௐௐ)LUVWௐ 6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐHPSOR\VௐGLUHFWௐILHOGௐVHUYLFHௐSHUVRQQHOௐWKDWௐZHௐFDQௐVHQGௐGLUHFWO\ௐWRௐWKHௐ FXVWRPHUVௐORFDWLRQVௐௐ:HௐDOVRௐZRUNௐZLWKௐWKLUGௐSDUW\ௐVHUYLFHௐFHQWHUVௐDFURVVௐ1RUWKௐ$PHULFDௐ WKDWௐZLOOௐGRௐZDUUDQW\ௐZRUNௐRQௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐSURGXFWVௐௐ5HJDUGOHVVௐRIௐWKHௐFXVWRPHUVௐ ORFDWLRQௐZHௐKDYHௐVHUYLFHௐKDQGOHG
:LOOௐ\RXௐFRYHUௐZDUUDQW\ௐVHUYLFHௐIRUௐLWHPVௐPDGHௐE\ௐRWKHUௐ PDQXIDFWXUHUVௐWKDWௐDUHௐSDUWௐRIௐ\RXUௐSURSRVDOௐRUௐDUHௐWKHVHௐ ZDUUDQWLHVௐLVVXHVௐW\SLFDOO\ௐSDVVHGௐRQௐWRௐWKHௐRULJLQDOௐ
HTXLSPHQWௐPDQXIDFWXUHU"
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐDVVLVWௐLQௐSURFHVVLQJௐZDUUDQW\ௐFODLPVௐIRUௐDOOௐSXUFKDVHGௐLWHPVௐFRYHUHGௐE\ௐ WKHLUௐUHVSHFWLYHௐPDQXIDFWXUHU¶VௐZDUUDQWLHVௐௐ)RUௐPRVWௐLWHPVௐZHௐKDQGOHௐWKHVHௐFODLPVௐGLUHFWO\ௐ ZLWKௐWKHௐPDQXIDFWXUHUௐIRUௐDௐVHDPOHVVௐFODLPௐE\ௐWKHௐHQGௐXVHUௐௐ7KLVௐZRXOGௐEHௐVLPLODUௐWRௐFODLPVௐ RQௐ6HZHUௐPDQXIDFWXUHGௐLWHPVௐௐ7KHௐRQO\ௐH[FHSWLRQௐLVௐDX[LOLDU\ௐHQJLQHVௐௐ(QJLQHௐZDUUDQW\ௐ FODLPVௐDQGௐUHSDLUVௐDUHௐKDQGOHGௐE\ௐWKHௐUHVSHFWLYHௐPDQXIDFWXUHUVௐVHUYLFHௐFHQWHUVௐDURXQGௐWKHௐ FRXQWU\ௐௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐGRHVௐDVVLVWௐZLWKௐFRPPXQLFDWLRQௐEHWZHHQௐWKHௐHQGௐXVHUௐDQGௐWKHௐ VHUYLFHௐFHQWHU
:KDWௐDUHௐ\RXUௐSURSRVHGௐH[FKDQJHௐDQGௐUHWXUQௐSURJUDPVௐDQGௐ SROLFLHV"
,IௐWKHௐFXVWRPHUௐGHFLGHVௐWRௐUHWXUQௐDௐSXUFKDVHGௐLWHPௐVXFKௐDVௐDௐVSDUHௐSDUWௐ6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ FKDUJHVௐDௐௐUHVWRFNLQJௐIHHௐௐ7KHௐFXVWRPHUௐZLOOௐDOVRௐEHௐUHVSRQVLEOHௐIRUௐVKLSSLQJௐ FKDUJHVௐௐ7KLVௐSROLF\ௐGRHVௐQRWௐDSSO\ௐWRௐQHZௐFXVWRPEXLOWௐHTXLSPHQWௐVROGௐWKURXJKௐRXUௐGHDOHUௐ QHWZRUNௐௐ$Q\ௐSRWHQWLDOௐUHWXUQௐIRUௐQHZௐHTXLSPHQWௐZRXOGௐEHௐQHJRWLDWHGௐZLWKௐWKHௐVHOOLQJௐGHDOHU
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐVHUYLFHௐFRQWUDFWௐRSWLRQVௐIRUௐWKHௐLWHPVௐLQFOXGHGௐ LQௐ\RXUௐSURSRVDO
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQW¶VௐGHDOHUௐQHWZRUNௐRIIHUVௐVHUYLFHௐSDFNDJHVௐIRUௐFXVWRPHUVௐௐ7KHVHௐSDFNDJHVௐ DUHௐSULFHGௐE\ௐRXUௐGHDOHUVௐௐ)RUௐUHJLRQVௐQRWௐVXSSRUWHGௐE\ௐRXUௐGHDOHUௐQHWZRUNௐ6HZHUௐ (TXLSPHQWௐRIIHUVௐTXDUWHUO\ௐPDLQWHQDQFHௐSDFNDJHVௐZLWKௐZRUNௐSHUIRUPHGௐE\ௐRXUௐRZQௐ)LHOGௐ 6HUYLFHௐ3HUVRQQHOௐௐ3ULFLQJௐLVௐRQௐDௐFDVHE\FDVHௐEDVLVௐEDVHGௐRQௐH[SHFWDWLRQVௐRIௐWKHௐ FXVWRPHU
7DEOH
%
3HUIRUPDQFH6WDQGDUGVRU*XDUDQWHHV
'HVFULEHLQGHWDLO\RXUSHUIRUPDQFHVWDQGDUGVRUJXDUDQWHHVLQFOXGLQJFRQGLWLRQVDQGUHTXLUHPHQWVWRTXDOLI\FODLPVSURFHGXUHDQGRYHUDOOVWUXFWXUH<RXPD\ XSORDGUHSUHVHQWDWLYHVDPSOHVRI\RXUSHUIRUPDQFHPDWHULDOV LIDSSOLFDEOH
LQWKHGRFXPHQWXSORDGVHFWLRQRI\RXUUHVSRQVHLQDGGLWLRQWRUHVSRQGLQJWRWKH TXHVWLRQVEHORZ
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐSHUIRUPDQFHௐVWDQGDUGVௐRUௐJXDUDQWHHVௐ
WKDWௐDSSO\ௐWRௐ\RXUௐVHUYLFHV
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐGRHVௐQRWௐKDYHௐDQ\ௐSHUIRUPDQFHௐJXDUDQWHHVௐWKDWௐDSSO\ௐWRௐVHUYLFHௐௐ:HௐGRௐRIIHUௐDௐ ௐSKRQHௐVXSSRUWௐIRUௐDOOௐVHUYLFHUHODWHGௐLVVXHVௐௐ)RUௐXUJHQWௐSDUWVௐQHHGVௐZHௐW\SLFDOO\ௐVKLSௐ ௐRIௐ
RUGHUVௐZLWKLQௐௐKRXUV
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐVHUYLFHௐVWDQGDUGVௐRUௐJXDUDQWHHVௐWKDWௐ
DSSO\ௐWRௐ\RXUௐVHUYLFHVௐ
SROLFLHVௐPHWULFVௐ.3,VௐHWF
:HௐGRௐQRWௐKDYHௐVHUYLFHௐSHUIRUPDQFHௐVWDQGDUGVௐFXUUHQWO\ௐEXWௐDUHௐORRNLQJௐWRௐLPSOHPHQWௐDௐSURJUDPௐLQௐ
7DEOH
3D\PHQW7HUPVDQG)LQDQFLQJ2SWLRQV
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐSD\PHQWௐWHUPVௐDQGௐDFFHSWHGௐSD\PHQWௐ
PHWKRGV"
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQW¶VௐSD\PHQWௐWHUPVௐIRUௐDOOௐPXQLFLSDOௐDQGௐHGXFDWLRQDOௐ&XVWRPHUVௐLVௐ1HWௐௐௐ2XUௐGHDOHUVௐZRXOG DOVRௐXWLOL]Hௐ1HWௐGD\ௐWHUPVௐWRௐWKHLUௐFXVWRPHUV
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐOHDVLQJௐRUௐILQDQFLQJௐRSWLRQVௐDYDLODEOHௐIRUௐ XVHௐE\ௐHGXFDWLRQDOௐRUௐJRYHUQPHQWDOௐHQWLWLHV
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐXWLOL]HVௐDQGௐUHFRPPHQGVௐ1&/ௐ*RYHUQPHQWௐ&DSLWDOௐIRUௐOHDVLQJௐRSWLRQVௐWRௐRXUௐ0XQLFLSDOௐ &XVWRPHUVௐௐ7KLVௐKDVௐSURYHGௐYHU\ௐXVHIXOௐIRUௐORQJௐWHUPௐOHDVLQJௐDUUDQJHPHQWVௐௐ)RUௐVKRUWௐWHUPௐUHQWDOௐQHHGVௐZH RIIHUௐUHQWDOVௐWKURXJKௐRXUௐVXEVLGLDU\ௐ5RFNௐ5HQWDOVௐௐ0DQ\ௐRIௐRXUௐGHDOHUVௐDOVRௐSDUWQHUௐZLWKௐXVௐLQௐRIIHULQJௐVKRUWௐ WHUPௐHTXLSPHQWௐUHQWDOV
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐVWDQGDUGௐWUDQVDFWLRQௐGRFXPHQWVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐ SURSRVHௐWRௐXVHௐLQௐFRQQHFWLRQௐZLWKௐDQௐDZDUGHGௐFRQWUDFWௐ
RUGHUௐIRUPVௐWHUPVௐDQGௐFRQGLWLRQVௐVHUYLFHௐOHYHOௐ
DJUHHPHQWVௐHWF
ௐ8SORDGௐDௐVDPSOHௐRIௐHDFKௐ
DVௐ
DSSOLFDEOH
ௐLQௐWKHௐGRFXPHQWௐXSORDGௐVHFWLRQௐRIௐ\RXUௐ
UHVSRQVH
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐDQGௐRXUௐGHDOHUVௐXWLOL]HௐRXUௐVWDQGDUGௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ3ULFHௐVKHHWVௐIRUௐTXRWLQJௐWRௐRXUௐFXVWRPHUVௐௐ :KHQௐDௐFXVWRPHUௐVXEPLWVௐDௐSXUFKDVHௐRUGHUௐWRௐRQHௐRIௐRXUௐGHDOHUVௐWKHௐGHDOHUௐVXEPLWVௐDௐFRS\ௐRIௐWKHௐFXVWRPHU SXUFKDVHௐRUGHUௐDORQJௐZLWKௐWKHௐZRUNVKHHWௐXVHGௐIRUௐTXRWDWLRQௐWRௐXVௐௐ:HௐXWLOL]HௐWKLVௐLQIRUPDWLRQௐWRௐHVWDEOLVKௐWKHௐ 6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐIHHௐௐ$OOௐRWKHUௐUHODWHGௐWUDQVDFWLRQௐGRFXPHQWVௐDUHௐKDQGOHGௐEHWZHHQௐRXUௐGHDOHUVௐDQGௐ FXVWRPHUVௐௐ6HHௐFRSLHVௐRIௐRXUௐZRUNVKHHWVௐXSORDGHGௐLQௐWKHௐSULFLQJௐVHFWLRQ
'Rௐ\RXௐDFFHSWௐWKHௐ3FDUGௐSURFXUHPHQWௐDQGௐSD\PHQWௐ
SURFHVV"ௐ,IௐVRௐLVௐWKHUHௐDQ\ௐDGGLWLRQDOௐFRVWௐWRௐ
6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHVௐIRUௐXVLQJௐWKLVௐSURFHVV" 6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐGRHVௐQRWௐDFFHSWௐ3&DUGௐIRUௐSD\PHQWVௐFXUUHQWO\
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 7DEOH
3ULFLQJDQG'HOLYHU\
3URYLGHGHWDLOHGSULFLQJLQIRUPDWLRQLQWKHTXHVWLRQVWKDWIROORZEHORZ.HHSLQPLQGWKDWUHDVRQDEOHSULFHDQGSURGXFWDGMXVWPHQWVFDQEHPDGHGXULQJWKHWHUPRI DQDZDUGHG&RQWUDFWDVGHVFULEHGLQWKH5)3WKHWHPSODWH&RQWUDFWDQGWKH6RXUFHZHOO3ULFHDQG3URGXFW&KDQJH5HTXHVW)RUP /LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
'HVFULEHௐ\RXUௐSULFLQJௐPRGHOௐ
HJௐOLQHLWHPௐGLVFRXQWVௐRUௐSURGXFWFDWHJRU\ௐ
GLVFRXQWV
ௐ3URYLGHௐGHWDLOHGௐSULFLQJௐGDWDௐ
LQFOXGLQJௐVWDQGDUGௐRUௐOLVWௐ
SULFLQJௐDQGௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐGLVFRXQWHGௐSULFH
ௐRQௐDOOௐRIௐWKHௐLWHPVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐ
ZDQWௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐWRௐFRQVLGHUௐDVௐSDUWௐRIௐ\RXUௐ5)3ௐUHVSRQVHௐ,IௐDSSOLFDEOHௐ SURYLGHௐDௐ6.8ௐIRUௐHDFKௐLWHPௐLQௐ\RXUௐSURSRVDOௐ8SORDGௐ\RXUௐSULFLQJௐ PDWHULDOVௐ
LIௐDSSOLFDEOH
ௐLQௐWKHௐGRFXPHQWௐXSORDGௐVHFWLRQௐRIௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVH
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐXWLOL]HVௐDௐVWUDLJKWIRUZDUGௐGLVFRXQWௐRIIௐOLVWௐSULFLQJௐPRGHOௐIRUௐDOOௐRXUௐ QHZௐHTXLSPHQWௐVDOHVௐௐ7KLVௐDOVRௐDSSOLHVௐWRௐDOOௐVSDUHௐSDUWVௐDQGௐDFFHVVRULHVௐௐ 3ULFLQJௐIRUௐDOOௐRXUௐQHZௐHTXLSPHQWௐPRGHOVௐKDVௐEHHQௐXSORDGHGௐDQGௐLVௐLQFOXGHGௐZLWKௐ WKLVௐVXEPLWWDOௐௐ:HௐGRௐQRWௐXWLOL]Hௐ6.8VௐIRUௐRXUௐHTXLSPHQWௐௐ$OOௐZRUNVKHHWVௐDUHௐ LGHQWLILHGௐE\ௐWKHLUௐPRGHOௐQDPHௐௐ3ULFLQJௐIRUௐDOOௐSDUWVௐDQGௐDFFHVVRULHVௐLVௐQRWௐ LQFOXGHGௐZLWKௐWKLVௐVXEPLWWDOௐDVௐWKHௐQXPEHUௐRIௐLWHPVௐLVௐTXLWHௐODUJHௐௐ0653ௐSULFLQJௐ IRUௐPRVWௐLWHPVௐFDQௐEHௐIRXQGௐDWௐZZZVHZHUVKRSFRP
4XDQWLI\ௐWKHௐSULFLQJௐGLVFRXQWௐUHSUHVHQWHGௐE\ௐWKHௐSULFLQJௐSURSRVDOௐLQௐWKLVௐ UHVSRQVHௐ)RUௐH[DPSOHௐLIௐWKHௐSULFLQJௐLQௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVHௐUHSUHVHQWVௐDௐ SHUFHQWDJHௐGLVFRXQWௐIURPௐ0653ௐRUௐOLVWௐVWDWHௐWKHௐSHUFHQWDJHௐRUௐ SHUFHQWDJHௐUDQJH
7KHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐGLVFRXQWௐIRUௐDOOௐQHZௐHTXLSPHQWௐLVௐௐRIIௐ0653ௐௐௐௐ7KHௐ GLVFRXQWௐIRUௐSDUWVௐDQGௐDFFHVVRULHVௐLVௐௐRIIௐ0653ௐௐ7KHௐGLVFRXQWௐIRUௐUHQWDOVௐLVௐ ௐRIIௐSXEOLVKHGௐUDWHVௐௐ7KHௐEX\RXWௐSULFHௐIRUௐUHQWDOVௐLIௐDSSOLFDEOHௐLVௐSULFHGௐDWௐௐ RIIௐ0653ௐௐ7KHVHௐGLVFRXQWVௐDUHௐPLQLPXPVௐDQGௐRXUௐGHDOHUVௐPD\ௐSURYLGHௐ DGGLWLRQDOௐGLVFRXQWV
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐTXDQWLW\ௐRUௐYROXPHௐGLVFRXQWVௐRUௐUHEDWHௐSURJUDPVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐ RIIHU
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐGRHVௐQRWௐKDYHௐDௐVWDQGDUGௐYROXPHௐGLVFRXQWௐSULFLQJௐVWUXFWXUHௐௐ +RZHYHUௐXVௐDQGௐRXUௐGHDOHUVௐZLOOௐRIIHUௐYROXPHௐGLVFRXQWVௐDVௐQHFHVVDU\ௐRQௐDௐFDVHௐ E\ௐFDVHௐEDVLVௐௐ:KHQௐRIIHUHGௐWKHVHௐGLVFRXQWVௐDUHௐQRWHGௐRQௐWKHௐTXRWHௐWRௐEHௐ DERYHௐDQGௐEH\RQGௐWKHௐVWDQGDUGௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐGLVFRXQW
3URSRVHௐDௐPHWKRGௐRIௐIDFLOLWDWLQJௐ³VRXUFHG´ௐSURGXFWVௐRUௐUHODWHGௐVHUYLFHVௐ ZKLFKௐPD\ௐEHௐUHIHUUHGௐWRௐDVௐ³RSHQௐPDUNHW´ௐLWHPVௐRUௐ³QRQVWDQGDUG RSWLRQV´ௐ)RUௐH[DPSOHௐ\RXௐPD\ௐVXSSO\ௐVXFKௐLWHPVௐ³DWௐFRVW´ௐRUௐ³DWௐFRVWௐ SOXVௐDௐSHUFHQWDJH´ௐRUௐ\RXௐPD\ௐVXSSO\ௐDௐTXRWHௐIRUௐHDFKௐVXFKௐUHTXHVW 6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐDQGRUௐRXUௐGHDOHUVௐZLOOௐSURYLGHௐQRQVWDQGDUGௐLWHPVௐWRௐEHௐ PRXQWHGௐRQௐRXUௐHTXLSPHQWௐDWௐUHTXHVWௐRIௐRXUௐFXVWRPHUVௐௐ7KHVHௐLWHPVௐDUHௐTXRWHGௐ RQௐDௐFDVHE\FDVHௐEDVLVௐDQGௐDUHௐFRQVLGHUHGௐSDUWௐRIௐRXUௐSURGXFWௐௐ7KHVHௐQRQ VWDQGDUGௐLWHPVௐDUHௐVXEMHFWௐWRௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐGLVFRXQW
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐDQGRUௐRXUௐGHDOHUVௐZLOOௐDOVRௐVXSSO\ௐFKDVVLVௐIRUௐRXUௐWUXFNௐPRXQWHGௐ PRGHOVௐௐ7KHVHௐFKDVVLVௐDUHௐFXUUHQWO\ௐEHLQJௐTXRWHGௐDWௐFRVWௐRQௐDௐFDVHௐE\ௐFDVHௐ EDVLVௐGXHௐWRௐSULFLQJௐLQIOX[ௐLQௐWKHௐPDUNHWௐௐ:HௐFRQVLGHUௐWKHVHௐLWHPVௐWRௐEHௐ³SDVV WKUX´ௐLWHPVௐDQGௐDUHௐQRWௐVXEMHFWௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐGLVFRXQWVௐRUௐIHHௐUHSRUWLQJ
,GHQWLI\ௐDQ\ௐHOHPHQWௐRIௐWKHௐWRWDOௐFRVWௐRIௐDFTXLVLWLRQௐWKDWௐLVௐ127ௐLQFOXGHGௐ LQௐWKHௐSULFLQJௐVXEPLWWHGௐZLWKௐ\RXUௐUHVSRQVHௐ7KLVௐLQFOXGHVௐDOOௐDGGLWLRQDOௐ FKDUJHVௐDVVRFLDWHGௐZLWKௐDௐSXUFKDVHௐWKDWௐDUHௐQRWௐGLUHFWO\ௐLGHQWLILHGௐDVௐ IUHLJKWௐRUௐVKLSSLQJௐFKDUJHVௐ)RUௐH[DPSOHௐOLVWௐFRVWVௐIRUௐLWHPVௐOLNHௐSUH GHOLYHU\ௐLQVSHFWLRQௐLQVWDOODWLRQௐVHWௐXSௐPDQGDWRU\ௐWUDLQLQJௐRUௐLQLWLDOௐ LQVSHFWLRQௐ,GHQWLI\ௐDQ\ௐSDUWLHVௐWKDWௐLPSRVHௐVXFKௐFRVWVௐDQGௐWKHLUௐ UHODWLRQVKLSௐWRௐWKHௐ3URSRVHU
,WHPVௐWKDWௐFDQௐEHௐLQFOXGHGௐRQௐDௐTXRWDWLRQௐWRௐDௐFXVWRPHUௐEXWௐDUHௐQRWௐRQௐRXUௐ SULFLQJௐZRUNVKHHWௐRUௐGLVFXVVHGௐLQௐWKHௐDERYHௐVHFWLRQVௐLQFOXGHௐWKHௐIROORZLQJௐௐ'HDOHUௐ VXSSOLHGௐIUHLJKWௐWUDLQLQJௐDQGௐSUHGHOLYHU\ௐLQVSHFWLRQVௐௐ7KHVHௐLWHPVௐDUHௐQRWௐVXEMHFWௐ WRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ'LVFRXQWௐRUௐIHHௐUHSRUWLQJ
,IௐIUHLJKWௐGHOLYHU\ௐRUௐVKLSSLQJௐLVௐDQௐDGGLWLRQDOௐFRVWௐWRௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ SDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLW\ௐGHVFULEHௐLQௐGHWDLOௐWKHௐFRPSOHWHௐIUHLJKWௐVKLSSLQJௐDQGௐ GHOLYHU\ௐSURJUDP
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐFKDUJHVௐIUHLJKWௐIURPௐRXUௐ'L[RQௐ,/ௐORFDWLRQௐWRௐRXUௐ'HDOHUVௐ ORFDWLRQௐௐ:HௐFKDUJHௐIUHLJKWௐRQௐDௐSHUௐPLOHௐEDVHVௐௐ2XUௐGHDOHUVௐPD\ௐLPSRVHௐDQௐ DGGLWLRQDOௐFKDUJHௐIRUௐIUHLJKWௐIURPௐWKHLUௐORFDWLRQௐWRௐWKHௐFXVWRPHUVௐORFDWLRQௐGHSHQGLQJௐ RQௐORFDWLRQௐௐ7KDWௐLVௐDௐVHSDUDWHௐFKDUJHௐDVௐOLVWHGௐLQௐTXHVWLRQௐ
6SHFLILFDOO\ௐGHVFULEHௐIUHLJKWௐVKLSSLQJௐDQGௐGHOLYHU\ௐWHUPVௐRUௐSURJUDPVௐ DYDLODEOHௐIRUௐ$ODVNDௐ+DZDLLௐ&DQDGDௐRUௐDQ\ௐRIIVKRUHௐGHOLYHU\ )RUௐIUHLJKWௐFKDUJHVௐWRௐFXVWRPHUVௐORFDWHGௐRXWVLGHௐRIௐWKHௐFRQWLQHQWDOௐ8QLWHGௐ6WDWHVௐ RUௐ&DQDGDௐZHௐZLOOௐZLWKௐRXUௐIUHLJKWௐEURNHUௐWRௐHVWDEOLVKௐWKHௐORZHVWௐSULFHௐRSWLRQVௐIRUௐ RXUௐFXVWRPHUVௐௐ2XUௐFXVWRPHUVௐDUHௐDOVRௐZHOFRPHGௐWRௐWDNHௐRQௐWKHௐIUHLJKWௐ UHVSRQVLELOLW\ௐWKHPVHOYHV
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐXQLTXHௐGLVWULEXWLRQௐDQGRUௐGHOLYHU\ௐPHWKRGVௐRUௐRSWLRQVௐ RIIHUHGௐLQௐ\RXUௐSURSRVDO
:HௐGRௐQRWௐFXUUHQWO\ௐRIIHUௐDQ\ௐXQLTXHௐIUHLJKWௐSURJUDPVௐRWKHUௐWKDWௐZKDWௐLVௐOLVWHGௐ DERYH
7DEOH
3ULFLQJ2IIHUHG
/LQH
,WHP 7KH3ULFLQJ2IIHUHGLQWKLV3URSRVDOLV
&RPPHQWV
FEHWWHUWKDQWKH3URSRVHUW\SLFDOO\RIIHUVWR*32VFRRSHUDWLYHSURFXUHPHQWRUJDQL]DWLRQVRUVWDWHSXUFKDVLQJGHSDUWPHQWV 6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐKDVௐDOZD\Vௐ RIIHUHGௐDௐGLVFRXQWௐIURPௐOLVWௐSULFHௐ
RQௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFW
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 7DEOH
$XGLWDQG$GPLQLVWUDWLYH)HH
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
6SHFLILFDOO\ௐGHVFULEHௐDQ\ௐVHOIDXGLWௐSURFHVVௐRUௐSURJUDPௐWKDWௐ\RXௐSODQௐWRௐHPSOR\ௐ WRௐYHULI\ௐFRPSOLDQFHௐZLWKௐ\RXUௐSURSRVHGௐ&RQWUDFWௐZLWKௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ7KLVௐSURFHVVௐ LQFOXGHVௐHQVXULQJௐWKDWௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSDUWLFLSDWLQJௐHQWLWLHVௐREWDLQௐWKHௐSURSHUௐSULFLQJௐ WKDWௐWKHௐ9HQGRUௐUHSRUWVௐDOOௐVDOHVௐXQGHUௐWKHௐ&RQWUDFWௐHDFKௐTXDUWHUௐDQGௐWKDWௐWKHௐ 9HQGRUௐUHPLWVௐWKHௐSURSHUௐDGPLQLVWUDWLYHௐIHHௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ3URYLGHௐVXIILFLHQWௐGHWDLOௐ WRௐVXSSRUWௐ\RXUௐDELOLW\ௐWRௐUHSRUWௐTXDUWHUO\ௐVDOHVௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐDVௐGHVFULEHGௐLQௐWKHௐ &RQWUDFWௐWHPSODWH
2XUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐSULFLQJௐZRUNVKHHWVௐDUHௐDFFHVVLEOHௐIRUௐGRZQORDGௐRQௐRXUௐ GHDOHUௐZHEVLWHௐௐ7KLVௐDVVXUHVௐWKDWௐRXUௐGHDOHUௐVDOHVௐVWDIIௐKDYHௐDFFHVVௐWRௐ WKHௐFRUUHFWௐSULFHௐSDJHVௐௐ7KHVHௐFRQWUDFWௐVSHFLILFௐSULFHௐVKHHWVௐKDYHௐWKHௐ ௐPLQLPXPௐGLVFRXQWௐDOUHDG\ௐOLVWHGௐWRௐSUHYHQWௐHUURUௐௐ
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐDXGLWVௐHYHU\ௐLQFRPLQJௐRUGHUௐWRௐGHWHUPLQHௐLIௐRXUௐ'HDOHUVௐ KDYHௐVROGௐLWௐYLDௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐௐ,IௐLWௐZDVௐGHWHUPLQHGௐLWௐZDVௐDௐ 6RXUFHZHOOௐVDOHௐZHௐYHULI\ௐDOOௐFRQWUDFWௐSULFLQJௐYLDௐRXUௐZRUNVKHHWௐDQGௐWKHௐ FXVWRPHUௐSXUFKDVHௐRUGHUௐௐ(YHU\ௐFXVWRPHUௐSXUFKDVHௐRUGHUௐXWLOL]LQJௐWKHௐ 6RXUFHZHOOௐFRQWUDFWௐPXVWௐOLVWௐWKHLUௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐPHPEHUVKLSௐQXPEHUௐDQGௐ 6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQW¶VௐFRQWUDFWௐQXPEHUௐௐ8SRQௐFRQILUPLQJௐWKHௐRUGHUௐLVௐ SXUFKDVHGௐYLDௐWKHௐFRQWUDFWௐZHௐGRFXPHQWௐHYHU\ௐRUGHUௐRQௐDQௐ([FHO VSUHDGVKHHWௐௐ7KLVௐVSUHDGVKHHWௐWUDFNVௐFRQWUDFWௐVHOOௐSULFHௐFRQWUDFWௐIHHௐ DQGௐVRௐRQௐௐ2XUௐ$FFRXQWLQJௐ'HSDUWPHQWௐDXGLWVௐWKLVௐVSUHDGVKHHWௐRQௐHYHU\ௐ RUGHUௐWKDWௐLVௐFRPSOHWHGௐEHIRUHௐVKLSSLQJௐௐ:HௐDOVRௐLGHQWLI\ௐWKHௐXVHௐRIௐWKHௐ FRQWUDFWௐRQௐRXUௐRUGHUௐWUDFNLQJௐGDWDEDVHௐIRUௐDQௐHDV\ௐWRௐDFFHVVௐUHFRUGௐRIௐ DOOௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐRUGHUV
)RUௐIHHௐUHSRUWLQJௐDQGௐUHPLWWDQFHௐZHௐKDYHௐDௐGHGLFDWHGௐSHUVRQௐLQௐRXUௐ $FFRXQWLQJௐ'HSDUWPHQWௐWKDWௐDXGLWVௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ2UGHUVௐVSUHDGVKHHWௐDQGௐ UHSRUWVௐVDOHVௐRQௐDௐTXDUWHUO\ௐEDVLVௐௐ)HHVௐDUHௐSDLGௐEDVHGௐRQௐWKLVௐTXDUWHUO\ௐ UHSRUWLQJ
,Iௐ\RXௐDUHௐDZDUGHGௐDௐFRQWUDFWௐSURYLGHௐDௐIHZௐH[DPSOHVௐRIௐLQWHUQDOௐPHWULFVௐWKDWௐ ZLOOௐEHௐWUDFNHGௐWRௐPHDVXUHௐZKHWKHUௐ\RXௐDUHௐKDYLQJௐVXFFHVVௐZLWKௐWKHௐFRQWUDFW :HௐFRQWLQXDOO\ௐPRQLWRUௐFRQWUDFWௐXVDJHௐDJDLQVWௐRYHUDOOௐVDOHVௐYROXPHVௐ WKURXJKௐRXUௐ'HDOHUVKLSVௐௐ:HௐWUDFNௐDQGௐDZDUGௐWKHௐKLJKHVWௐJURVVLQJௐGHDOHUௐ VDOHVSHUVRQௐWKDWௐXWLOL]HVௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐRQௐDௐ\HDUO\ௐEDVLVௐGXULQJௐ RXUௐGHDOHUௐDZDUGVௐFHUHPRQ\ௐௐ,WௐVKRXOGௐEHௐQRWHGௐWKDWௐWKHௐ6RXUFZHOOௐ &RQWUDFWௐLVௐWKHௐRQO\ௐFRQWUDFWௐZKHUHௐZHௐRIIHUௐWKLVௐDZDUGௐௐ:HௐDOVRௐ FRPSDUHௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐFRQWUDFWௐDJDLQVWௐFRPSHWLQJௐQDWLRQDOௐFRQWUDFWVௐDQGௐ GHDOHUௐKHOGௐVWDWHௐFRQWUDFWVௐௐ7KHVHௐFRPSDULVRQVௐKHOSௐXVௐWRௐSXWௐHPSKDVLVௐ RQௐWUDLQLQJௐGHDOHUௐVDOHVௐVWDII
,GHQWLI\ௐDௐSURSRVHGௐDGPLQLVWUDWLYHௐIHHௐWKDWௐ\RXௐZLOOௐSD\ௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐIRUௐ IDFLOLWDWLQJௐPDQDJLQJௐDQGௐSURPRWLQJௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐ&RQWUDFWௐLQௐWKHௐHYHQWௐWKDWௐ \RXௐDUHௐDZDUGHGௐDௐ&RQWUDFWௐௐ7KLVௐIHHௐLVௐW\SLFDOO\ௐFDOFXODWHGௐDVௐDௐSHUFHQWDJHௐRIௐ 9HQGRU¶VௐVDOHVௐXQGHUௐWKHௐ&RQWUDFWௐRUௐDVௐDௐSHUXQLWௐIHH
ௐLWௐLVௐQRWௐDௐOLQHLWHPௐ
DGGLWLRQௐWRௐWKHௐ0HPEHU¶VௐFRVWௐRIௐJRRGVௐ
6HHௐWKHௐ5)3ௐDQGௐWHPSODWHௐ&RQWUDFWௐIRUௐ
DGGLWLRQDOௐGHWDLOV
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐZLOOௐSD\ௐDQௐDGPLQLVWUDWLYHௐIHHௐWRௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐEDVHGௐRQௐ ௐRIௐWKHௐ6RXUFHZHOOௐVHOOௐSULFHௐWRௐWKHௐFXVWRPHUௐௐ7KLVௐௐIHHௐLVௐSDLGௐRQௐ RXUௐHTXLSPHQWௐVSDUHௐSDUWVௐDQGௐDFFHVVRULHVௐௐ:HௐGRௐQRWௐSD\ௐWKH DGPLQLVWUDWLYHௐIHHௐRQௐFKDVVLVௐZKLFKௐDUHௐFRQVLGHUHGௐDௐSDVVௐWKUXௐZLWKௐRXUௐ XQLWVௐௐ:HௐZLOOௐDOVRௐSD\ௐWKHௐௐDGPLQLVWUDWLYHௐIHHௐRQௐDOOௐUHQWDOௐELOOLQJVௐ OLPLWHGௐWRௐௐPRQWKVௐDQGௐWRௐEX\RXWVௐRIௐUHQWDOVௐEDVHGௐRQௐWKHௐQHJRWLDWHGௐ EX\RXWௐSULFHௐ
7KHௐIHHVௐDUHௐFDOFXODWHGௐDQGௐSDLGௐRQௐDௐTXDUWHUO\ௐEDVLV
7DEOH$
'HSWKDQG%UHDGWKRI2IIHUHG(TXLSPHQW3URGXFWVDQG6HUYLFHV /LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
3URYLGHௐDௐGHWDLOHGௐGHVFULSWLRQௐRIௐWKHௐHTXLSPHQWௐ
SURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHVௐWKDWௐ\RXௐDUHௐRIIHULQJௐLQௐ\RXUௐ
SURSRVDO
6HZHUௐ(TXLSPHQWௐLVௐRIIHULQJௐDQௐH[WHQVLYHௐUDQJHௐRIௐHTXLSPHQWௐWKDWௐDOOௐIDOOௐLQWRௐWKHௐ6HZHUௐ9DFXXPௐ ௐ +\GUR([FDYDWLRQௐ&DWHJRU\ௐRQௐWKLVௐSURSRVDOௐௐ2XUௐOLVWௐRIௐRIIHUHGௐHTXLSPHQWௐLVௐDVௐIROORZV« ௐௐௐௐ2XUௐPRGHOVௐ(&2ௐ ௐ
(&2ௐ&RPELQDWLRQௐ6HZHUௐ&OHDQHUV
ௐௐௐௐ2XUௐ*HQHVLVௐ5HF\FOHUௐ6HZHUௐ&OHDQHU
ௐௐௐௐ2XUௐ0RQJRRVHௐ6HULHVௐRIௐ7UXFNௐDQGௐ7UDLOHUௐ-HWWHUV
ௐௐௐௐ2XUௐௐ ௐௐ6HULHVௐRIௐ7UXFNௐDQGௐ7UDLOHUௐ-HWWHUV
ௐௐௐௐ2XUௐௐ6HULHVௐ7UXFNௐ-HWWHUV
ௐௐௐௐ2XUௐ5DPYDFௐ6HULHVௐ+\GURௐ([FDYDWLRQௐ7UXFNV
ௐௐௐௐ2Uௐ5DPYDFௐ6HULHVௐ$LUௐ([FDYDWLRQௐ7UXFNV
ௐௐௐௐ2XUௐ-$-ௐ6HULHVௐRIௐ(DVHPHQWௐ0DFKLQHVௐIRUௐ6HZHUௐ&OHDQLQJ ௐௐௐௐ2XUௐௐௐ ௐௐ5RGGHUVௐIRUௐ6HZHUௐ&OHDQLQJ
ௐௐௐௐ6SDUHௐSDUWVௐDQGௐ$FFHVVRULHVௐIRUௐDERYHௐOLVWHGௐHTXLSPHQW ௐௐௐௐ2XUௐ5HQWDOௐ3URJUDPௐRIௐDERYHௐHTXLSPHQW
:LWKLQௐWKLVௐ5)3ௐFDWHJRU\ௐWKHUHௐPD\ௐEHௐVXEFDWHJRULHVௐ RIௐVROXWLRQVௐ/LVWௐVXEFDWHJRU\ௐWLWOHVௐWKDWௐEHVWௐGHVFULEHௐ \RXUௐSURGXFWVௐDQGௐVHUYLFHV
$OOௐRXUௐHTXLSPHQWௐIDOOVௐXQGHUௐWKHௐSULPDU\ௐFDWHJRU\ௐRQௐWKHௐSURSRVDO
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 7DEOH%
'HSWKDQG%UHDGWKRI2IIHUHG(TXLSPHQW3URGXFWVDQG6HUYLFHV ,QGLFDWHEHORZLIWKHOLVWHGW\SHVRUFODVVHVRIHTXLSPHQWSURGXFWVDQGVHUYLFHVDUHRIIHUHGZLWKLQ\RXUSURSRVDO3URYLGHDGGLWLRQDOFRPPHQWVLQWKHWH[WER[ SURYLGHGDVQHFHVVDU\
/LQH
,WHP &DWHJRU\RU7\SH 2IIHUHG
&RPPHQWV
6HZHUௐYDFXXPVௐRUௐFRPELQDWLRQௐVHZHUௐFOHDQHUV <HV
1R
6HHௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ/LVW
+\GURௐRUௐDLUௐH[FDYDWLRQௐHTXLSPHQW <HV
1R
6HHௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ/LVW
-HWWHUVௐDQGௐURGGHUV <HV
1R
6HHௐ(TXLSPHQWௐ/LVW
'HZDWHULQJௐPXGௐWUDVKௐDQGௐFHQWULIXJDOௐSXPSV <HV
1R
1RௐLWHPVௐVSHFLILFDOO\ௐLQௐWKLVௐFDWHJRU\ௐEXWௐRXUௐ*HQHLVLVௐ5HF\FOHUௐXQLWௐGRHVௐGH ZDWHUௐEHIRUHௐGXPSLQJ
3XPSVௐXVHGௐLQௐOLIWௐVWDWLRQVௐVHZDJHௐWUHDWPHQWௐZDWHUௐ WUHDWPHQWௐRUௐZDWHUௐFROOHFWLRQௐIDFLOLWLHV
<HV
1R
1RௐLWHPVௐVSHFLILFDOO\ௐLQௐWKLVௐFDWHJRU\ௐEXWௐRXUௐ
(&2ௐZLWKௐRSWLRQDOௐWUDVKௐ
SXPSௐFDQௐEHௐXVHGௐDVௐDQௐHPHUJHQF\ௐSXPSௐV\VWHP
$FFHVVRULHVௐVXSSOLHVௐDQGௐUHSODFHPHQWௐRUௐZHDUௐSDUWVௐ UHODWHGௐWRௐWKHௐRIIHULQJVௐDERYH
<HV
1R
7DEOH
,QGXVWU\6SHFLILF4XHVWLRQV
/LQH
,WHP 4XHVWLRQ 5HVSRQVH
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐSURGXFWௐRUௐHTXLSPHQWௐIHDWXUHVௐWKDWௐLPSURYHௐ RSHUDWRUௐVDIHW\
2XUௐ
(&2ௐZLWKௐSDWHQWHGௐ+\GUR'ULYHௐV\VWHPௐRSHUDWHVௐZLWKௐWKHௐWUDQVPLVVLRQௐLQௐQHXWUDOௐ DQGௐQRௐWUDQVIHUௐFDVHௐUHTXLUHGௐZKLFKௐKDVௐWKHௐSRWHQWLDOௐWRௐSRSௐLQWRௐJHDUௐDQGௐGULYHௐDZD\ௐௐ $OOௐRIௐRXUௐ(&2ௐ6HULHVௐHTXLSPHQWௐRSHUDWRUVௐDWௐDௐUHGXFHGௐ530ௐIRUௐORZHUHGௐQRLVHௐIRUௐWKHௐ RSHUDWRUௐௐ2XUௐVWDQGDUGௐZLUHOHVVௐUHPRWHௐKDVௐDQௐHVWRSௐVDIHW\ௐFKHFNௐEXLOWௐLQ
'HVFULEHௐDQ\ௐSURGXFWௐRUௐHTXLSPHQWௐLQQRYDWLRQVௐWKDWௐLQFUHDVHௐ XSWLPHௐDQGௐRSHUDWRUௐSURGXFWLYLW\
2XUௐ
(&2ௐZLWKௐSDWHQWHGௐ+\GUR'ULYHௐV\VWHPௐRSHUDWHVௐZLWKௐWKHௐWUDQVPLVVLRQௐLQௐQHXWUDOௐ DQGௐQRௐWUDQVIHUௐFDVHௐUHTXLUHGௐௐ7KHௐRSHUDWRUௐVLPSO\ௐSXWVௐWKHௐWUXFNௐLQௐQHXWUDOௐVHWVௐWKHௐ SDUNLQJௐEUDNHௐJHWVௐRXWௐRIௐWKHௐWUXFNௐDQGௐWXUQVௐRQௐRQHௐVZLWFKௐWRௐDFWLYDWHௐWKHௐXQLWௐௐ7KHQௐ WKH\ௐFDQௐYDFXXPௐDQGRUௐMHWௐZLWKLQௐVHFRQGVௐௐ:HௐGRௐQRWௐXWLOL]HௐDQ\ௐFRPSOHWHGௐFRPSXWHUVௐRUௐ WRXFKௐVFUHHQVௐWKDWௐSUHYHQWௐWKHௐRSHUDWRUௐIURPௐXVLQJௐZKLOHௐZHDULQJௐJORYHV 2XUௐGLJGHHSௐERRPௐDYDLODEOHௐRQௐWKHௐ
(&2ௐDQGௐRXUௐ+;ௐVHULHVௐDOORZVௐIRUௐLQFUHDVHௐ
YDFXXPௐGHSWKௐZLWKRXWௐWKHௐQHHGௐIRUௐDVௐPDQ\ௐYDFXXPௐWXEHௐDGGLWLRQV 7DEOH
([FHSWLRQVWR7HUPV&RQGLWLRQVRU6SHFLILFDWLRQV)RUP /LQH,WHP127,&(
7RLGHQWLI\DQ\H[FHSWLRQRUWRUHTXHVWDQ\PRGLILFDWLRQWRWKH6RXUFHZHOOWHPSODWH&RQWUDFWWHUPVFRQGLWLRQVRUVSHFLILFDWLRQVD 3URSRVHUPXVWVXEPLWWKHH[FHSWLRQRUUHTXHVWHGPRGLILFDWLRQRQWKH([FHSWLRQVWR7HUPV&RQGLWLRQVRU6SHFLILFDWLRQV)RUPLPPHGLDWHO\EHORZ7KHFRQWUDFW VHFWLRQWKHVSHFLILFWH[WDGGUHVVHGE\WKHH[FHSWLRQRUUHTXHVWHGPRGLILFDWLRQDQGWKHSURSRVHGPRGLILFDWLRQPXVWEHLGHQWLILHGLQGHWDLO3URSRVHU VH[FHSWLRQVDQG
SURSRVHGPRGLILFDWLRQVDUHVXEMHFWWRUHYLHZDQGDSSURYDORI6RXUFHZHOODQGZLOOQRWDXWRPDWLFDOO\EHLQFOXGHGLQWKHFRQWUDFW &RQWUDFW6HFWLRQ 7HUP&RQGLWLRQRU6SHFLILFDWLRQ ([FHSWLRQRU3URSRVHG0RGLILFDWLRQ
'RFXPHQWV
(QVXUH\RXUVXEPLVVLRQGRFXPHQW
V
FRQIRUPVWRWKHIROORZLQJ
'RFXPHQWVLQ3')IRUPDWDUHSUHIHUUHG'RFXPHQWVLQ:RUG([FHORUFRPSDWLEOHIRUPDWVPD\DOVREHSURYLGHG 'RFXPHQWVVKRXOG127KDYHDVHFXULW\SDVVZRUGDV6RXUFHZHOOPD\QRWEHDEOHWRRSHQWKHILOH,WLV\RXUVROHUHVSRQVLELOLW\WRHQVXUHWKDWWKHXSORDGHG
GRFXPHQW
V
DUHQRWHLWKHUGHIHFWLYHFRUUXSWHGRUEODQNDQGWKDWWKHGRFXPHQWVFDQEHRSHQHGDQGYLHZHGE\6RXUFHZHOO 6RXUFHZHOOPD\UHMHFWDQ\UHVSRQVHZKHUHDQ\GRFXPHQW V
FDQQRWEHRSHQHGDQGYLHZHGE\6RXUFHZHOO
,I\RXQHHGWRXSORDGPRUHWKDQRQH
GRFXPHQWIRUDVLQJOHLWHP\RXVKRXOGFRPELQHWKHGRFXPHQWVLQWRRQH]LSSHGILOH,IWKH]LSSHGILOHFRQWDLQVPRUHWKDQ RQH
GRFXPHQWHQVXUHHDFKGRFXPHQWLVQDPHGLQUHODWLRQWRWKHVXEPLVVLRQIRUPDWLWHPUHVSRQGLQJWR)RUH[DPSOHLIUHVSRQGLQJWRWKH0DUNHWLQJ3ODQ FDWHJRU\VDYHWKHGRFXPHQWDV³0DUNHWLQJ3ODQ´
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 234 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 3ULFLQJ3ULFH6KHHWV]LS0RQGD\2FWREHU
)LQDQFLDO6WUHQJWKDQG6WDELOLW\)LQDQFLDOV]LS0RQGD\2FWREHU
0DUNHWLQJ3ODQ6DPSOHV0DUNHWLQJ'RFXPHQWV]LS0RQGD\2FWREHU
:0%(0%(6%(RU5HODWHG&HUWLILFDWHV(GJH&UHGLW&HUWRI9HULILFDWLRQSGI0RQGD\2FWREHU
:DUUDQW\,QIRUPDWLRQ:$55$17<32/,&<$1'352&('85(GRF[0RQGD\2FWREHU
6WDQGDUG7UDQVDFWLRQ'RFXPHQW6DPSOHV6RXUHZHOO2UGHU7UDQVDFWLRQ'RFXPHQWSGI0RQGD\2FWREHU
8SORDG$GGLWLRQDO'RFXPHQW$GGLWLRQDO'RFXPHQWV]LS0RQGD\2FWREHU
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 235 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) $GGHQGD7HUPVDQG&RQGLWLRQV
352326(5$)),'$9,7$1'$6685$1&(2)&203/,$1&(
,FHUWLI\WKDW,DPWKHDXWKRUL]HGUHSUHVHQWDWLYHRIWKH3URSRVHUVXEPLWWLQJWKHIRUHJRLQJ3URSRVDOZLWKWKHOHJDODXWKRULW\WRELQGWKH3URSRVHUWRWKLV$IILGDYLWDQG $VVXUDQFHRI&RPSOLDQFH
7KH3URSRVHULVVXEPLWWLQJWKLV3URSRVDOXQGHULWVIXOODQGFRPSOHWHOHJDOQDPHDQGWKH3URSRVHUOHJDOO\H[LVWVLQJRRGVWDQGLQJLQWKHMXULVGLFWLRQRILWV UHVLGHQFH
7KH3URSRVHUZDUUDQWVWKDWWKHLQIRUPDWLRQSURYLGHGLQWKLV3URSRVDOLVWUXHFRUUHFWDQGUHOLDEOHIRUSXUSRVHVRIHYDOXDWLRQIRUFRQWUDFWDZDUG 7KH3URSRVHULQFOXGLQJDQ\SHUVRQDVVLVWLQJZLWKWKHFUHDWLRQRIWKLV3URSRVDOKDVDUULYHGDWWKLV3URSRVDOLQGHSHQGHQWO\DQGWKH3URSRVDOKDVEHHQFUHDWHG ZLWKRXWFROOXGLQJZLWKDQ\RWKHUSHUVRQFRPSDQ\RUSDUWLHVWKDWKDYHRUZLOOVXEPLWDSURSRVDOXQGHUWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ DQGWKH3URSRVDOKDVLQDOOUHVSHFWVEHHQ
FUHDWHGIDLUO\ZLWKRXWDQ\IUDXGRUGLVKRQHVW\7KH3URSRVHUKDVQRWGLUHFWO\RULQGLUHFWO\HQWHUHGLQWRDQ\DJUHHPHQWRUDUUDQJHPHQWZLWKDQ\SHUVRQRU EXVLQHVVLQDQHIIRUWWRLQIOXHQFHDQ\SDUWRIWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQRURSHUDWLRQVRIDUHVXOWLQJFRQWUDFW DQGWKH3URSRVHUKDVQRWWDNHQDQ\DFWLRQLQUHVWUDLQWRIIUHH WUDGHRUFRPSHWLWLYHQHVVLQFRQQHFWLRQZLWKWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ$GGLWLRQDOO\LI3URSRVHUKDVZRUNHGZLWKDFRQVXOWDQWRQWKH3URSRVDOWKHFRQVXOWDQW DQLQGLYLGXDO
RUDFRPSDQ\
KDVQRWDVVLVWHGDQ\RWKHUHQWLW\WKDWKDVVXEPLWWHGRUZLOOVXEPLWDSURSRVDOIRUWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ 7RWKHEHVWRILWVNQRZOHGJHDQGEHOLHIDQGH[FHSWDVRWKHUZLVHGLVFORVHGLQWKH3URSRVDOWKHUHDUHQRUHOHYDQWIDFWVRUFLUFXPVWDQFHVZKLFKFRXOGJLYHULVHWR DQRUJDQL]DWLRQDOFRQIOLFWRILQWHUHVW$QRUJDQL]DWLRQDOFRQIOLFWRILQWHUHVWH[LVWVZKHQDYHQGRUKDVDQXQIDLUFRPSHWLWLYHDGYDQWDJHRUWKHYHQGRU¶VREMHFWLYLW\ LQSHUIRUPLQJWKHFRQWUDFWLVRUPLJKWEHLPSDLUHG
7KHFRQWHQWVRIWKH3URSRVDOKDYHQRWEHHQFRPPXQLFDWHGE\WKH3URSRVHURULWVHPSOR\HHVRUDJHQWVWRDQ\SHUVRQQRWDQHPSOR\HHRUOHJDOO\DXWKRUL]HG DJHQWRIWKH3URSRVHUDQGZLOOQRWEHFRPPXQLFDWHGWRDQ\VXFKSHUVRQVSULRUWR'XH'DWHRIWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ ,IDZDUGHGDFRQWUDFWWKH3URSRVHUZLOOSURYLGHWR6RXUFHZHOO3DUWLFLSDWLQJ(QWLWLHVWKHHTXLSPHQWSURGXFWVDQGVHUYLFHVLQDFFRUGDQFHZLWKWKHWHUPV FRQGLWLRQVDQGVFRSHRIDUHVXOWLQJFRQWUDFW
7KH3URSRVHUSRVVHVVHVRUZLOOSRVVHVVEHIRUHGHOLYHULQJDQ\HTXLSPHQWSURGXFWVRUVHUYLFHVDOODSSOLFDEOHOLFHQVHVRUFHUWLILFDWLRQVQHFHVVDU\WRGHOLYHU VXFKHTXLSPHQWSURGXFWVRUVHUYLFHVXQGHUDQ\UHVXOWLQJFRQWUDFW 7KH3URSRVHUDJUHHVWRGHOLYHUHTXLSPHQWSURGXFWVDQGVHUYLFHVWKURXJKYDOLGFRQWUDFWVSXUFKDVHRUGHUVRUPHDQVWKDWDUHDFFHSWDEOHWR6RXUFHZHOO 0HPEHUV8QOHVVRWKHUZLVHDJUHHGWRWKH3URSRVHUPXVWSURYLGHRQO\QHZDQGILUVWTXDOLW\SURGXFWVDQGUHODWHGVHUYLFHVWR6RXUFHZHOO0HPEHUVXQGHUDQ DZDUGHG&RQWUDFW
7KH3URSRVHUZLOOFRPSO\ZLWKDOODSSOLFDEOHSURYLVLRQVRIIHGHUDOVWDWHDQGORFDOODZVUHJXODWLRQVUXOHVDQGRUGHUV 7KH3URSRVHUXQGHUVWDQGVWKDW6RXUFHZHOOZLOOUHMHFW5)3SURSRVDOVWKDWDUHPDUNHGFRQILGHQWLDO RUQRQSXEOLFHWF
HLWKHUVXEVWDQWLDOO\RULQWKHLUHQWLUHW\
8QGHU0LQQHVRWD6WDWXWHV6HFWLRQ
VXEGLYLVLRQDOOSURSRVDOVDUHFRQVLGHUHGQRQSXEOLFGDWDXQWLOWKHHYDOXDWLRQLVFRPSOHWHDQGD&RQWUDFWLV DZDUGHG$WWKDWSRLQWSURSRVDOVEHFRPHSXEOLFGDWD0LQQHVRWD6WDWXWHV6HFWLRQSHUPLWVRQO\FHUWDLQQDUURZO\GHILQHGGDWDWREHFRQVLGHUHGDWUDGH VHFUHWDQGWKXVQRQSXEOLFGDWDXQGHU0LQQHVRWD
V'DWD3UDFWLFHV$FW
3URSRVHULWVHPSOR\HHVDJHQWVDQGVXEFRQWUDFWRUVDUHQRW
,QFOXGHGRQWKH³6SHFLDOO\'HVLJQDWHG1DWLRQDOVDQG%ORFNHG3HUVRQV´OLVWPDLQWDLQHGE\WKH2IILFHRI)RUHLJQ$VVHWV&RQWURORIWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV 'HSDUWPHQWRIWKH7UHDVXU\IRXQGDW
KWWSV
ZZZWUHDVXU\JRYRIDFGRZQORDGVVGQOLVWSGI
,QFOXGHGRQWKHJRYHUQPHQWZLGHH[FOXVLRQVOLVWVLQWKH8QLWHG6WDWHV6\VWHPIRU$ZDUG0DQDJHPHQWIRXQGDW KWWSV
VDPJRY6$0
RU
3UHVHQWO\GHEDUUHGVXVSHQGHGSURSRVHGIRUGHEDUPHQWGHFODUHGLQHOLJLEOHRUYROXQWDULO\H[FOXGHGIURPSURJUDPVRSHUDWHGE\WKH6WDWHRI0LQQHVRWD
WKH8QLWHG6WDWHVIHGHUDOJRYHUQPHQWRUWKH&DQDGLDQJRYHUQPHQWDVDSSOLFDEOH RUDQ\3DUWLFLSDWLQJ(QWLW\9HQGRUFHUWLILHVDQGZDUUDQWVWKDWQHLWKHULW QRULWVSULQFLSDOVKDYHEHHQFRQYLFWHGRIDFULPLQDORIIHQVHUHODWHGWRWKHVXEMHFWPDWWHURIWKLVVROLFLWDWLRQ %\FKHFNLQJWKLVER[,DFNQRZOHGJHWKDW,DPERXQGE\WKHWHUPVRIWKH3URSRVHU¶V$IILGDYLWKDYHWKHOHJDODXWKRULW\WRVXEPLWWKLV3URSRVDORQEHKDOIRIWKH 3URSRVHUDQGWKDWWKLVHOHFWURQLFDFNQRZOHGJPHQWKDVWKHVDPHOHJDOHIIHFWYDOLGLW\DQGHQIRUFHDELOLW\DVLI,KDGKDQGVLJQHGWKH3URSRVDO7KLVVLJQDWXUHZLOOQRW EHGHQLHGVXFKOHJDOHIIHFWYDOLGLW\RUHQIRUFHDELOLW\VROHO\EHFDXVHDQHOHFWURQLFVLJQDWXUHRUHOHFWURQLFUHFRUGZDVXVHGLQLWVIRUPDWLRQ6KDZQ%RQGHOH,QVLGH 6DOHV0DQDJHU6HZHU(TXLSPHQW&RRI$PHULFD
7KH3URSRVHUGHFODUHVWKDWWKHUHLVDQDFWXDORUSRWHQWLDO&RQIOLFWRI,QWHUHVWUHODWLQJWRWKHSUHSDUDWLRQRILWVVXEPLVVLRQDQGRUWKH3URSRVHUIRUHVHHVDQDFWXDORU SRWHQWLDO&RQIOLFWRI,QWHUHVWLQSHUIRUPLQJWKHFRQWUDFWXDOREOLJDWLRQVFRQWHPSODWHGLQWKHELG <HV 1R
7KH%LGGHUDFNQRZOHGJHVDQGDJUHHVWKDWWKHDGGHQGXPDGGHQGDEHORZIRUPSDUWRIWKH%LG'RFXPHQW Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 236 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) &KHFNWKHER[LQWKHFROXPQ,KDYHUHYLHZHGWKLVDGGHQGXPEHORZWRDFNQRZOHGJHHDFKRIWKHDGGHQGD )LOH1DPH
,KDYHUHYLHZHGWKH
EHORZDGGHQGXPDQG
DWWDFKPHQWV
LI
DSSOLFDEOH
3DJHV
$GGHQGXPBB6HZHUB9DFB+\GUR([FDYDWLRQB3XPSVB5)3B
7KX6HSWHPEHU
30
$GGHQGXPBB6HZHUB9DFB+\GUR([FDYDWLRQB3XPSVB5)3B
)UL6HSWHPEHU
30
$GGHQGXPBB6HZHUB9DFB+\GUR([FDYDWLRQB3XPSVB5)3B
7KX$XJXVW
30
Bid Number: RFP 101221 Vendor Name: Sewer Equipment Co. of America
Packet Pg. 237 Attachment: ^Sourcewell Contract (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve the City of Redding Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report and Implementation of Scenario 2; and find that the action is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15262 – Feasibility and Planning Studies.
Fiscal Impact
There are no direct funding impacts in accepting the Stormwater Trash Control Measures CostBenefit Evaluation Report (Report). If accepted, the cost estimates for trash control strategies and infrastructure identified in the Report will be used for future planning and budgeting purposes. While planning is ongoing, the cost of the planning effort to date is approximately $158,750 and has been funded by the National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Fixed Fee.
Alternative Action
The City Council may choose not to accept the Report, and provide alternate direction to staff. It will be challenging for staff to proceed with planning, funding, and implementing future trash control improvements in the City of Redding (City) without acceptance of the Report.
Background/Analysis
In response to the growing challenges with trash levels in creeks, rivers, lakes, and shorelines, the California State Water Board adopted the Trash Amendments (Amendments) in 2015. This action amended two statewide water quality control plans to include trash control requirements for owners or operators of municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s).
MEETING DATE: May 16, 2023
ITEM NO. 9.11(f)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.11(f)--Consider the City of Redding Stormwater Trash Control Measures CostBenefit Evaluation Report.
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report Page 2
Consistent with the Amendments, the City was required to reduce the amount of trash discharged from its MS4, beginning in 2020. The City must demonstrate 100 percent capture, or equivalent, of all trash five millimeters in size or greater by December 2, 2030. Interim trash reduction milestones and milestone dates will be implemented through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Phase II Small MS4 General Permit (MS4 Permit) that will be issued to the City and other public agencies in California, or directed through other regulatory orders.
The Amendments designate land areas where local agencies will need to implement the new stormwater trash control measures. The designated land areas are based on currently developed land uses that are presumed to generate high levels of trash. These areas are referred to as Priority Land Uses (PLUs). The PLUs include high density residential, industrial, commercial, mixed urban, and public transportation stations that are connected to the City’s storm water system.
To initiate trash control measure implementation planning, the State Water Board issued an order to Phase II permittees in June 2017 requesting that each public agency choose its compliance strategy for addressing the Amendments. Track 1 requires the local agency to install, operate, and maintain State Water Board certified and approved trash full capture systems in the storm drain system that drains all PLUs. Track 2 allows for a combination of full capture systems, multi-benefit projects, institutional controls, and/or other treatment controls to achieve full capture system equivalency. The City notified the State Water Board of its intention to implement the Track 2 compliance approach.
To date, the City’s PLUs have been identified, and a draft Stormwater Trash Control Implementation Plan and the Report have been prepared. The Report informs the selection of trash controls to address Amendment requirements mandated by the State Water Board. The purpose of the evaluation was to identify viable trash controls and preliminary planning-level cost estimates for implementing these controls. Eight potential new or enhanced trash control measures and four trash control measure implementation strategies were evaluated by comparing base/initial, annual/ongoing, 50-year life cycle costs, and the estimated maximum trash management benefits. The four implementation strategies include:
• Scenario 1 – Installation & operation of four (4) high-flow capacity (large) and 368 catch basin inserts (small) trash full capture systems; and the implementation of a new inspection program to address trash on private properties that do not drain to full capture systems. • Scenario 2 – Installation & operation of 655 catch basin inserts (small) trash full capture systems; and the implementation of a new inspection program to address trash on private properties that do not drain to full capture systems.
• Scenario 3 - Installation & operation of four (4) high-flow capacity (large) trash full capture systems; installation and maintenance of 312 (partial-capture) curb-inlet screens; implementation of a new inspection program to address trash on private properties that do not drain to full capture systems; and the expansion of on-land trash cleanup programs. • Scenario 4 – Implementation of six (6) types of trash source control measures and no highflow capacity (large) or catch basin insert (small) trash full capture systems.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2023
Re: 9.11(f)--Consider the COR Stormwater Trash Control Measures Cost-Benefit Evaluation Report Page 3
After reviewing the four implementation strategies, the Public Works Department (Public Works) chose Scenario 2 for pilot implementation in the Fiscal Year 2023-24. This scenario provides the lowest life-cycle costs, realistic short-term implementation tasks, and a high confidence of meeting the compliance objectives. To fund the pilot implementation, Public Works will request allocation of resources through the budget cycle that will be adopted in June.
When the City’s new MS4 Permit is issued, the State Water Board will require the City to prepare and submit a final Trash Capture Implementation Plan (Plan). The Plan will outline the implementation strategy the City will employ to meet the required trash reduction milestones.
The next step includes bringing the pilot implementation results and the draft Plan to the Council for review and approval. Staff recommends the Council accept the Report as it will support the preparation of the final Plan.
Environmental Review
Staff has reviewed the activity and determined that the action is statutorily exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15262 – Feasibility and Planning Studies. A project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future actions which the agency, board, or commission has not approved, adopted, or funded does not require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration but does require consideration of environmental factors. Acceptance of the Report would not result in physical alteration of the environment, and the action has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment. No further action is required at this time.
Implementation of any of the four strategies would require separate review under CEQA.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Notice of Exemption
Final Revised Draft Redding Trash CM Eval Report 20230503
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) APPROVED Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator)
STORMWATER TRASH CONTROL
MEASURES COST-BENEFIT EVALUATION
Complying with the Statewide Trash Amendments
Final Draft
Prepared for:
Prepared by:
1410 Jackson Street
Oakland, CA 94602
March 2023
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 ii
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1
1.1 PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 BACKGROUND................................................................................................................................. 1
2. POTENTIAL NEW OR ENHANCED TRASH CONTROL MEASURES ................................. 5
2.1 LARGE TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS ................................................................................................ 6
2.2 SMALL TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS.............................................................................................. 10
2.3 TRASH INSPECTIONS ON PRIVATE PROPERTIES..................................................................................... 14
2.4 CURB-INLET SCREENS ON INLETS IN THE PUBLIC ROW ......................................................................... 19
2.5 EXPANDED ON-LAND CLEANUPS....................................................................................................... 22
2.6 ENHANCED PUBLIC CONTAINER/BIN MANAGEMENT............................................................................ 25
2.7 ENHANCED CITY-WIDE PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH PROGRAM................................................... 27
2.8 MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE – SINGLE-USE PLASTIC FOOD SERVICE WARE .................................................... 29
2.9 SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL NEW OR ENHANCED SOURCE CONTROLS ........................................................ 31
3. TRASH CONTROL MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION SCENARIOS ................................... 32
3.1 SCENARIO 1: TRASH FULL CAPTURE - LARGE AND SMALL SYSTEMS ......................................................... 33
3.2 SCENARIO 2: TRASH FULL CAPTURE - SMALL SYSTEMS ......................................................................... 33
3.3 SCENARIO 3: LARGE FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS & MULTIPLE INSTITUTIONAL AND SOURCE CONTROLS............. 34
3.4 SCENARIO 4: ONLY INSTITUTIONAL AND SOURCE CONTROLS ................................................................. 35
3.5 COMPARISON OF TRASH CONTROL MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION SCENARIOS............................................ 36
4. 10-YEAR TRASH CONTROL MEASURE ACTION PLAN ........................................... 36
5. REFERENCES ........................................................................................... 41
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 iii
Executive Summary
On April 7, 2015, the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) adopted amendments to two statewide water quality control plans to include trash control requirements for owners or operators of Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s), including those regulated through the California Statewide Phase II NPDES General Permit. These amendments require MS4 owners and operators to address trash generated in Priority Land Use (PLU) areas and discharged to local water bodies from their MS4s. The State Water Board allows for two approaches to address the trash generated in PLU areas: 1) install certified trash full capture systems into the MS4; or 2) implement other trash controls to manage trash at a level equivalent to full capture systems. The deadline for MS4 owners and operators to address trash in all PLU areas is December 2030.
To inform the selection of trash controls to address the stormwater trash management requirements mandated by the State Water Board, the City of Redding (City) conducted a Trash Control Measures Evaluation. The primary purpose of the evaluation was to identify viable trash controls and preliminary planning-level cost estimates for implementing these controls to reduce trash in stormwater discharges.
Eight (8) potential new or enhanced trash control measures and four (4) trash control measure implementation scenarios (e.g., combinations of trash control measures) were evaluated by comparing base/initial, annual/ongoing, and 50-year life cycle costs, and the estimated maximum trash management benefits. Trash control measures evaluated include catch basin insert and high-flow capacity types of trash full capture systems, trash inspections on private properties, curb-inlet screens on inlets in the public right-of-way, expanded on-land cleanups, enhanced public container/bin management, enhanced city-wide public education and outreach, and the adoption/enforcement of a new municipal ordinance to reduce the distribution of single-use plastic food service ware at local eating establishments. The four (4) implementation scenarios designed to achieve the goal of the trash amendments include the following:
• Scenario 1 – Installation & operation of four (4) high-flow capacity (large) and 368 catch basin insert (small) trash full capture systems; and the implementation of a new inspection program to address trash on private properties that don’t drain to full capture systems. • Scenario 2 – Installation & operation of 655 catch basin inserts (small) trash full capture systems; and the implementation of a new inspection program to address trash on private properties that don’t drain to full capture systems.
• Scenario 3 - Installation & operation of four (4) high-flow capacity (large) trash full capture systems; installation and maintenance of 312 (partial-capture) curb-inlet screens; implementation of a new inspection program to address trash on private properties that don’t drain to full capture systems; and the expansion of on-land trash cleanup programs. • Scenario 4 – Implementation of six (6) types of trash source control measures and no high-flow capacity (large) or catch basin insert (small) trash full capture systems.
Based on discussions with City staff, a preliminary draft eight-year trash control measure action plan was developed that includes trash control measures described in scenario 1, which was identified as the most cost-effective control measure scenario of those evaluated. Trash control measure scenario 1 provides the highest level of confidence in achieving the mandated stormwater trash management goals established by the State Water Board. The eight-year action plan includes preliminary City staff resource needs and cost estimates for implementing capital/initial and annual/ongoing tasks and serves as a draft road map for addressing these stormwater trash management goals by the December 2030 deadline.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 iv
Figures
FIGURE 1. PRIORITY LAND USE (PLU) AREAS AND TRASH MANAGEMENT AREAS (TMAS) IDENTIFIED BY THE CITY OF REDDING AS GENERATING MODERATE OR HIGH TRASH LEVELS.................................................................................................................... 3 FIGURE 2. OVERVIEW OF THE LOCATIONS AND CATCHMENTS FOR FOUR HIGH PRIORITY POTENTIAL LARGE TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS IN THE CITY OF REDDING........................................................................................................................................................ 8 FIGURE 3. OVERVIEW OF THE LOCATIONS OF 655 POTENTIAL SMALL TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS IN THE CITY OF REDDING, AS IDENTIFIED IN THE TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM FEASIBILITY EVALUATION (SEE APPENDIX B). .................................................................. 12 FIGURE 4. OVERVIEW OF THE PRIVATE PROPERTIES THAT GENERATE BASELINE MODERATE, HIGH OR VERY HIGH TRASH LEVELS AND THEREFORE
WOULD BE POTENTIALLY SUBJECT TO IMPLEMENTING NEW ENHANCED TRASH CONTROLS ON PRIVATE PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 15 FIGURE 5. OVERVIEW OF THE LOCATIONS FOR 312 POTENTIAL CURB-INLET SCREENS IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ...................................... 20 Tables
TABLE 1. CITY OF REDDING BASELINE TRASH GENERATION LEVELS FOR PLU AND NON-PLU AREAS......................................................... 2 TABLE 2. CITY OF REDDING PRIORITY LAND USE (PLU) ACRES IN EACH BASELINE TRASH GENERATION CATEGORY...................................... 4 TABLE 3. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR THE PLANNING, INSTALLATION, AND OPERATION OF LARGE TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS AT FOUR LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ............................................................................................ 9 TABLE 4. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR THE PLANNING, INSTALLATION, AND OPERATION OF SMALL TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEMS AT 655 LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ........................................................................................... 13 TABLE 5. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR CREATING AND IMPLEMENTING A TRASH INSPECTION PROGRAM TO ADDRESS TRASH LEVELS ON PRIVATE PROPERTIES IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ........................................................................................... 16 TABLE 6. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR INSTALLING AND MAINTAINING 312 CURB-INLET SCREENS IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 21 TABLE 7. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR EXPANDED ON-LAND CLEANUPS IN THE CITY OF REDDING...................... 23 TABLE 8. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR ENHANCING PUBLIC CONTAINER/BIN MANAGEMENT IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ...................................................................................................................................................................... 26 TABLE 9. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR AN ENHANCED CITY-WIDE PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH PROGRAM IN THE CITY OF REDDING. ................................................................................................................................................. 28 TABLE 10. PRELIMINARY PLANNING-LEVEL COSTS ESTIMATES FOR ADOPTING AND IMPLEMENTING A SINGLE-USE PLASTIC FOOD SERVICE WARE ORDINANCE.......................................................................................................................................................... 30 TABLE 11. SUMMARY OF THE PRELIMINARY PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATE AND TRASH REDUCTION BENEFITS OF IMPLEMENTING POTENTIAL NEW OR ENHANCED TRASH CONTROL MEASURES.................................................................................................................. 31 TABLE 12. IMPLEMENTATION SCENARIOS FOR NEW/ENHANCED TRASH CONTROL MEASURES DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE THE GOAL OF THE TRASH AMENDMENTS (I.E., FULL CAPTURE OR EQUIVALENT IN ALL PLU AREAS) IN THE CITY OF REDDING............................................... 32 TABLE 13. PRELIMINARY PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES FOR IMPLEMENTING SCENARIO 1. ............................................................. 33 TABLE 14. PRELIMINARY PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES FOR IMPLEMENTING SCENARIO 2. ............................................................. 33 TABLE 15. PRELIMINARY PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES FOR IMPLEMENTING SCENARIO 3. ............................................................. 34 TABLE 16. PRELIMINARY PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES FOR IMPLEMENTING SCENARIO 4. ............................................................. 35 TABLE 17. SUMMARY TABLE OF PRELIMINARY PLANNING LEVEL COST ESTIMATES FOR TRASH CONTROL MEASURE IMPLEMENTATION SCENARIOS DESIGNED TO ACHIEVE THE TRASH REDUCTION GOAL MANDATED BY THE STATEWIDE TRASH AMENDMENTS.................. 36 TABLE 18. SUMMARY OF TASKS IN 10-YEAR ACTION PLAN FOR THE CITY OF REDDING........................................................................ 38 TABLE 19. ESTIMATED CITY OF REDDING CONSULTANT/CAPITAL COSTS AND STAFFING RESOURCE NEEDS FOR IMPLEMENTING THE 10-YEAR ACTION PLAN................................................................................................................................................................. 40 Appendices
A – CITY OF REDDING BASELINE TRASH GENERATION MAPS AND TRASH MANAGEMENT AREAS (TMAS)
B - TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM FEASIBILITY EVALUATION - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 v
List of Abbreviations
BASMAA BAY AREA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AGENCIES ASSOCIATION
BIDS BUSINESS IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS
CALTRANS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
CPSS CONNECTOR PIPE SCREENS
FY FISCAL YEAR
GIS GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM
GSRD GROSS SOLIDS REMOVAL SYSTEMS
HDS HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATOR
MRP MUNICIPAL REGIONAL NPDES PERMIT FOR STORMWATER
NPDES NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
NSBB/DSBB NUTRIENT SEPARATING BAFFLE BOXES
O&M OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
OVTAS ON-LAND VISUAL ASSESSMENTS
ROW PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
SFBRWQCB SAN FRANCISCO BAY REGIONAL WATER QUALITY CONTROL BOARD
TMAS TRASH MANAGEMENT AREAS
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 1
1. Introduction
1.1 Purpose
This memorandum serves as the final deliverable of the Trash Control Measure Planning Project being conducted by EOA, Inc. (EOA) for the City of Redding (City). The goal of this project is to identify the costs and benefits of a range of trash control measures that have shown to be effective in reducing trash in municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s). If implemented, these controls would assist the City in reducing trash discharged from its MS4 and help address the trash reduction goal mandated by the State Water Resources Control Board’s (State Water Board) Trash Amendments. The Trash Amendments state that each applicable MS4 in California must effectively reduce trash in stormwater discharges by the year 2030. This memorandum is the culmination of previous tasks conducted as part of the Trash Control Measure Planning Project for the City and summarizes the results of all previous task deliverables, which are included as appendices (e.g., Trash Full Capture System Feasibility Evaluation).
1.2 Background
The City is subject to requirements of the Trash Amendments adopted by the State Water Board in 2015.
The Trash Amendments were added to the statewide Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries (ISWEBE), which effectively serves as the water quality control plan for inland surface water throughout California. Section 2.2 of the ISWEBE states:
“Trash shall not be present in inland surface waters, enclosed bays, estuaries, and along shorelines or adjacent areas in amounts that adversely affect beneficial uses or cause nuisance.” The Trash Amendments also require MS4s to effectively reduce trash from their discharges by implementing: 1) Track 1 - trash full capture systems1 certified by the State Water Board in their MS4; or 2) Track 2 - combinations of trash control measures that are equivalent to full capture systems (i.e., full capture system equivalency). Implementation has to occur in predefined trash generating areas called Priority Land Use (PLU) areas.2 As described in its Stormwater Trash Control Implementation Plan (City of Redding 2018), the City has decided to implement the “Track 2” compliance approach to reduce trash in PLU areas, which is defined in Section 2.1 of the Trash Amendments as the:
“The implementation of a plan with a combination of full capture systems, multi-benefit projects, institutional controls, and/or other treatment controls to achieve full capture system equivalency.” To assist in implementing the Track 2 approach, the City established baseline trash generation levels for all PLU areas draining to its MS4 by conducting On-land Visual Trash Assessments (OVTAs). Trash
1 Full Capture Systems are those that trap all particles that are 5 millimeter (mm) or greater and have a design treatment capacity that is either: a) not less than the peak flow rate resulting from a one-year, one-hour storm in the subdrainage area, or b) appropriately sized and designed to carry at least the same flows as the corresponding storm drain. The 5-mm size limit corresponds with the diameter of a cigarette butt. Over 40 types of full capture systems have been certified by the State Water Board to-date. 2 Priority land uses are defined as those developed sites, facilities, or land uses (i.e., not simply zoned land uses) within the MS4 permittee’s jurisdiction from which discharges of trash are regulated by these trash provisions as follows: (1) High-Density Residential: all land uses with at least ten (10) developed dwelling units/acre; (2) Industrial: land uses where the primary activities on the developed parcels involve product manufacture, storage, or distribution (e.g., manufacturing businesses, warehouses, equipment storage lots, junkyards, wholesale businesses, distribution centers, or building material sales yards); (3) Commercial: land uses where the primary activities on the developed parcels involve the sale or transfer of goods or services to consumers (e.g., business or professional buildings, shops, restaurants, theaters, vehicle repair shops, etc.); (4) Mixed Urban: land uses where high-density residential, industrial, and/or commercial land uses predominate collectively (i.e., are intermixed). (5) Public Transportation Stations: facilities or sites where public transit agencies’ vehicles load or unload passengers or goods (e.g., bus stations and stops).
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 2
generation categories (low, moderate, high and very high) were assigned to PLU areas based on the results of these assessments, which were conducted on a combination of PLU areas and public right-ofway (ROW) areas adjacent to the PLU areas. This memorandum reflects the results of assessments conducted in 2017/2018 and 2020/2021.
As described in the City’s Stormwater Trash Control Implementation Plan (Implementation Plan), those PLU areas identified as generating low levels of trash (i.e., a consistent OVTA score of “A”), have achieved the trash full capture system equivalency (FSCE) standard established by the Trash Amendments. PLU areas that generate moderate, high and very high baseline trash generation levels that need additional reduction are depicted on the City’s baseline trash generation map (Figure 1), which reflects the results of reassessments conducted in 2020/2021. Higher resolution baseline generation maps are included in Appendix A. Baseline acreage and the relative (%) annual trash loading from each PLU category are summarized in Table 1. Details on the methods used to derive annual trash loading are included in the City’s Implementation Plan.
Table 1. City of Redding baseline trash generation levels for PLU and Non-PLU areas.
Land Use
PLU Area Trash Generation Category (acres)
Total
Low Moderate High Very High Unknown a
Commercial 457 586 507 -- -- 1,550
High Density Residential 270 206 127 -- -- 603
Industrial 287 173 105 -- -- 565
Mixed Urban -- -- -- -- -- --
Public Transportation Stationsb < 0.1 2 5 -- < 0.1 7
Totals 1014 967 744 0 < 0.1 2,725
% of Baseline Trash Generation (PLU Areas)c
Total
Low Moderate High Very High Unknown a
Commercial 0.0% 14.9% 51.4% -- -- 66.3%
High Density Residential 0.0% 5.2% 12.9% -- -- 18.1%
Industrial 0.0% 4.4% 10.6% -- -- 15.0%
Mixed Urban -- -- -- -- -- --
Public Transportation Stationsb < 0.1% < 0.1% 0.5% -- < 0.1% 0.6% Totals 0.0% 24.5% 75.5% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0%
a Unknown areas refers to areas not assigned a baseline trash generation category. These areas include bus stops that were not assessed and CalTrans jurisdictional areas.
b Public transportation stations are bus stops, which are assumed to each be 200 ft2 on average. c Trash generation is based on the volume of trash generated per acre of land. Generation rates differ between moderate, high and very high areas. For additional information, see the City’s Implementation Plan.
To allow for a more geographically refined approach to tracking trash control measure implementation and associated trash reductions over time, the City was subdivided into Trash Management Areas (TMAs).
The City’s TMA boundaries are also illustrated on Figure 1 and trash generation levels for each TMA are provided in Table 2.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 3
Figure 1. Priority Land Use (PLU) areas and Trash Management Areas (TMAs) identified by the City of Redding as generating moderate or high trash levels.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 4
Table 2. City of Redding Priority Land Use (PLU) acres in each baseline trash generation category.
Trash Management
Area (TMA)
PLU Area Trash Generation (acres)
% of Baseline
Trash in
all PLU Areas
Non-PLU Areas
(acres)
Total Area
(PLU and Non-PLU)
Low Moderate High Subtotal
TMA01 108 201 131 440 19.4% 1,223 1,663
TMA02 46 15 19 80 2.0% 434 514
TMA03 61 127 265 453 22.9% 306 759
TMA04 67 149 68 284 12.7% 145 429
TMA05 69 37 50 156 5.1% 405 561
TMA06 56 70 63 189 7.8% 664 853
TMA07 142 226 64 432 17.0% 1,361 1,793
TMA08 67 98 54 219 8.9% 1,344 1,563
TMA09 20 9 -- 29 0.5% 435 464
TMA10 167 4 24 195 1.6% 436 631
TMA11 10 6 -- 16 0.4% 198 214
TMA12 1 1 -- 2 0.1% 156 158
TMA13 40 4 1 45 0.3% 113 158
TMA14 66 7 -- 73 0.4% 1,200 1,273
TMA15 94 13 5 112 1.1% 27,804 27,916
Totals 1,014 967 744 2,725 100.0% 36,221 38,946
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 250 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 5
Types of New or Enhanced Trash Control Measures Evaluated While the City currently implements a number of trash control measures that aid in managing trash levels in its MS4, because baseline levels in PLU areas have not yet achieved a consistent low trash generation level (i.e., full capture equivalent) as depicted on the City’s baseline map, the City is required to implement new or enhanced measures to reach the mandated stormwater trash management goal by 2030, as established by the Trash Amendments. After conducting: 1) a survey of City staff to document existing trash controls and interest in different types of enhance control measures; 2) field visits to identify primary/dominant trash sources; and 3) a Trash Full Capture System Feasibility Analysis (see Appendix B) to identify the most cost-effective full capture approaches to address trash in the City, potential trash reduction strategies that the City should consider implementing have been identified and are the focus of this cost-benefit evaluation. These strategies are further described later in this document, but include the following types of trash control measures:
• Large Trash Full Capture Systems
• Small Trash Full Capture Systems
• Trash Inspections on Private Properties
• Curb-inlet screens on Inlets in the Public ROW (with existing street sweeping) • Expanded On-Land Cleanups
• Enhanced Public Container/Bin Management
• Enhanced City-Wide Public Education and Outreach
• Municipal Ordinance – Single-use Plastic Food Service Ware Each of these trash control measures is described and the estimated costs and trash reduction benefits associated with each is provided.
2. Potential New or Enhanced Trash Control Measures
This section describes each potential new or enhanced trash control measure evaluated. The extent to which the City has implemented the control measure to-date, the potential future implementation of the control measure, the estimated trash reduction benefits of existing and new/enhanced trash control measure implementation, and the estimated costs of implementing the new/enhanced control measure (as described) are summarized in this section. Please note the following:
• The trash reduction benefits associated with potential new/enhanced controls that are summarized in this section should be considered preliminary estimates, as they are based on a combination of the City’s baseline trash generation map and best professional judgement based on the current understanding of the effectiveness of each control measure. • Cost estimates included in this section and in Section 3 should be considered preliminary planning-level estimates and may not include all costs associated with the design, planning, purchase, construction/installation, implementation, and operation and maintenance associated with the control measure. Assumptions associated with estimating the costs for each control measure are described.
• Costs estimates presented are based on the most readily available information at the time that this evaluation was conducted, including staffing rates (fully burdened) that were provided by the
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 251 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 6
City. Comparisons of base/initial costs (e.g., design, planning, purchasing, and constructing/installing), annual ongoing costs (e.g., implementation and operation/maintenance and replacement for full capture systems), and 50-year life cycle costs were developed using this information to assist the City in evaluating the most cost-effective approaches to achieving mandated trash load reductions. More detailed cost estimates will likely be needed should the City decide to move forward with the implementation of one or more of the control measures evaluated.
2.1 Large Trash Full Capture Systems
Large trash full capture systems are devices that can address trash from an entire stormwater catchment area (including storm drains on private property). These systems provide a single location for maintenance, potentially reducing operation and maintenance costs over time. Two disadvantages of large systems are the relatively high capital and construction costs, which require a large initial funding source, and the higher instance of subsurface utility conflicts at desired locations within highly urbanized areas. Additionally, large systems installed in open channels may be infeasible due to wildlife habitat concerns or at a minimum require environmental permitting, which may increase planning costs.
There are four general types of large trash full capture systems - hydrodynamic separators, gross solids removal systems, baffle boxes, and netting systems. The selection of a large system will depend on the characteristics of a specific location to allow for construction and maintenance, the extent of hydraulic impacts caused by the system, the potential for environmental permitting, and the magnitude trash load reduction that the system will achieve. Additional information on the types of large full capture systems can be found in the City’s Trash Full Capture System Feasibility Evaluation (Full Capture Evaluation), which is included as Appendix B.
Maintenance of most types of large full capture systems is generally performed using a vacuum-assisted (i.e., vactor) truck. For netting systems, nets are removed via a crane or truck with a hydraulic boom, and replaced accordingly. At a minimum, maintenance is performed at least once per year to ensure that the device consistently maintains the full capture standard. Manufacture recommended maintenance frequencies (if available) should followed so that the device is operating as designed during all storm events.
Existing and Planned Large Trash Full Capture Systems
No large trash full capture systems are currently known to exist in the City. At the time this evaluation was conducted, the City did not have concrete plans to install one or more large trash full capture systems.
Potential Large Trash Full Capture Systems
In the Full Capture Evaluation (Appendix B), all stormwater catchments in the City were evaluated via a desktop analysis for the feasibility of installing large trash full capture systems. Trash reduction benefits and preliminary costs for installing/constructing and maintaining/operating large full capture systems were evaluated for thirty (30) potential locations. Based on the estimated costs and trash reduction benefits, three locations (i.e., FTC01C-1, FTC01C-3, and FTC04E) were identified as high priority sites and it was recommended that the City further evaluate the feasibility of implementing large capture systems.
Through further discussion with City staff on the feasibility of implementing large full capture systems at the three sites, two of the three sites (i.e., FTC01C-3 and FTC04E) were included in this broader control measures evaluation. The other site (i.e., FTC01C-1) was not further considered due to site-specific complexities and feasibility issues identified by the City. Two additional sites (i.e., FTC01B and FTC03A-1),
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 7
however, were also included in this broader control measures evaluation based on input from the City.
The locations and catchments for the four sites evaluated in this broader control measures evaluation for large full capture systems are included in Figure 2. Should large capture systems be installed at these four, the City would achieve an estimated 39% trash reduction from PLU areas.
Based on the desktop analysis and preliminary field work conducted at the four sites, netting systems appear to be the most optimal type of large trash full capture system for open channel locations (i.e., FTC01C-3 and FTC04E) and baffle boxes are the most optimal type of system for locations where the installation would occur underground (i.e., FTC01B and FTC01C-3). Examples of these systems are included in the images below. Additional details on each of these types of systems are included in Appendix B.
Cost Estimates
The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the planning, design, installation, and operation of the four large trash capture systems are presented in Table 3. Additional detail regarding locations, types and assumptions associated with these potential large trash full capture systems are included in Appendix B.
Example Baffle Box System
Bioclean Debris Separating Baffle Box System
(www.biocleanenvironmental.com)
Example Netting System
StormTrap - TrashTrap
(www.stormtrap.com)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 8
Figure 2. Overview of the locations and catchments for four high priority potential large trash full capture systems in the City of Redding.
FTC01C-3
FTC04E
FTC01B
FTC03A-1
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 9
Table 3. Preliminary planning-level costs estimates for the planning, installation, and operation of large trash full capture systems at four locations in the City of Redding.
Summary of Enhancement
City Staff
Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Task
Geographical Span
of Implementation
Assumptions
Estimated
Staffing
Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual)
Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Hours
Portion
of FTEa
Capital costs of system
design, installation,
construction, and
contingency
All four potential
large full capture
system catchment
locations (i.e., sites
FTC01B, FTC01C-3,
FTC03A-1, and
FTC04E).
Contractor constructs/installs systems
at four locations (FTC01B, FTC01C-3,
FTC03A-1, and FTC04E) identified as
highest priority by City staff. A total of
two (2) in-line netting and two (2) baffle
box systems.
NA -- -- -- $4,322,000 -- -- -- --
City develops concept
and releases bid/RFP for
large full capture systems
at all large device
locations listed in the Full
Trash Capture Evaluation
and manages
construction contract.
Based on feasibility evaluation, City staff
has enough information to develop and
release bid package for design/build of
the systems. City staff assist with design
of system.
City Project Coordinator staff time only
needed for the first two (2) years (i.e.,
Base/Initial Tasks). No on-going costs
associated with this task.
City Project CoordinatorStorm Drains 1500 0.75 $260,900 $195,675 -- -- -- -- City Storm Drain Utility
Supervisor 40 0.02 $168,700 $3,374 -- -- -- --
City develops standard
operating procedure for
maintenance of large
system.
City Storm Drain Supervisor with
assistance from City Lead Storm Drain
Maintenance Worker develops standard
operating procedure for maintenance of
large system and conducts initial
training of field staff.
City Storm Drain Utility
Supervisor 400 0.2 $168,700 $33,740 -- -- -- --
City Lead Storm Drain
Maintenance Worker 120 0.06 $103,240 $6,194 -- -- -- -- City operates and
maintains system
One (1) maintenance event each year
per baffle box system; Four (4)
maintenance events each year per
netting system. One (1) vactor truck
operator and three (3) maintenance
staff per maintenance event. A total of
seven (7) hours per event
City Lead Storm Drain
Maintenance Worker -- -- -- -- 378 0.19 $103,240 $19,512 City Storm Drain
Maintenance Worker -
Temporary
-- -- -- -- 756 0.38 $36,100 $13,646
Vactor Truck Operator -- -- -- -- 378 0.19 $103,240 $19,512 Overhead Costs Oversight of all tasks above City Assistant Director of Public Works 20 0.01 $330,380 $3,304 40 0.02 $330,380 $6,608 Totals 2080 1.04 -- $4,564,287 1552 0.78 -- $59,278
a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 10
2.2 Small Trash Full Capture Systems
Screening systems that are installed in stormwater catch basins (or drop inlets) are commonly known as catch basin inserts (CBIs). CBIs are placed inside a catch basin to prevent trash, organic material (e.g. leaves and twigs), and sediment from entering the storm drain outflow pipe within the catch basin. There are two general designs of CBIs, surface inlet baskets/screens and outlet screens. Surface inlet baskets/screens are attached to the side
walls or lip of the catch basin, while
outlet screens are placed in the catch
basin in front of the outlet pipe. An
illustration of an outlet screen is
provided to the right. A wide variety of
CBI designs exist, mostly in the form of
outlet screens (e.g., connector pipe
screens). CBIs that use filtering walls or
filter media are not applicable for
trapping trash and do not meet the
trash full capture standard. As a result,
the term “insert” is not necessarily
synonymous with trash full capture.
Maintenance of CBIs is performed using
a vacuum-assisted (i.e., vactor) truck or
manually with a shovel or clamshell. At a minimum, maintenance is performed at least once per year to ensure that the device consistently maintains the full capture standard. If the device is observed to have a plugged or blinded screen or is greater than 50 percent full during a maintenance event, the maintenance frequency should be increased so that the device is neither plugged nor more than half full at the next maintenance event.
Existing Small Full Capture Systems
At the time this evaluation was conducted, two small full capture systems were installed in storm drain inlets located in the City of Redding. These devices were installed in new developments and address areas identified as low trash generating on the City’s baseline trash generation map.
Potential Additional Small Full Capture Systems
Based on the GIS data provided by the City, there are roughly 1,315 storm drain inlets in the public ROW that drain areas with moderate or high trash generation in the City. Of these inlets, it is estimated that roughly 270 will not support small full capture systems due to the configuration of the catch basins or the prohibitively large size of the upstream drainage area. Therefore, it may be possible to install inlet-based small trash full capture systems in a total of 1,045 inlets that drain moderate or high trash generating areas. Based on the desktop analysis described in Appendix B, it is estimated that the City could install up to 655 small trash full capture systems in a portion of these 1,045 inlets and address all moderate and Outlet screen-type of catch basin insert trash full capture system (Courtesy of Alameda County Flood and Water Conservation District)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 256 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 11
high trash generating areas that drain to the public ROW. 3 The locations of these 655 systems are
illustrated Figure 3 and in Appendix B.
Of the 655 small full capture systems, 287 are located within the four catchment areas where large full capture systems appear to be the most-cost effective types of full capture systems (see Appendix B). This leaves 368 small full capture systems located outside of these four large full capture system catchments where small full capture systems could be installed.
Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the planning, design, installation, and operation of the potential 655 small capture full trash capture devices throughout the City are presented in Table 4. Additional detail regarding the location, type and assumptions associated with these potential devices is included in Appendix B.
3 Because some inlets are connected by underground pipes (i.e., daisy-chained), devices placed in these 655 inlets will likely address trash from the land areas draining to the 1,045 inlets in the public ROW.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 12
Figure 3. Overview of the locations of 655 potential small trash full capture systems in the City of Redding, as identified in the Trash Full Capture System Feasibility Evaluation (see Appendix B).
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 13
Table 4. Preliminary planning-level costs estimates for the planning, installation, and operation of small trash full capture systems at 655 locations in the City of Redding. a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year Summary of Enhancement
City Staff Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Task Geographical Span
of Implementation Assumptions
Estimated
Staffing Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual) Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated
Costs Hours Portion of
FTEa
Hours Portion of
FTEa
City develops
concept and
releases bid/RFP
for small
capture systems
655 public ROW
inlets in Moderate
and High trash
generating areas
that can support
small full capture
systems
All planning tasks conducted by City staff
City Project Coordinator- Storm
Drains 500 0.25 $260,900 $65,225 -- -- -- --
City Storm Drain Utility Supervisor 8 0.004 $168,700 $675 -- -- -- -- City Lead Storm Drain Maintenance
Worker 80 0.04 $103,240 $4,130 -- -- -- --
City Storm Drain Maintenance
Worker - Temporary (calculations
assume 2 workers)
160 0.08 $36,100 $2,888 -- -- -- --
Capital costs of
system,
installation, and
contingency
655 Public ROW
Inlets
• Contractor installs devices
• Capital costs estimated to be $1,000 per
device (see Appendix B)
• Replacement of each inlet twice over a 50-
year timeframe (i.e., average replacement
rate of 26 devices/yr) at $1,000/device
Materials Costs -- -- -- $655,000 -- -- -- $26,200
City develops
standard
operating
procedure for
maintenance of
small capture
systems.
City Storm Drain Utility Supervisor with
assistance from City Lead Storm Drain
Maintenance Worker develops standard
operating procedure for maintenance of
small capture systems.
City Storm Drain Utility Supervisor 80 0.04 $168,700 $6,748 -- -- -- -- City Lead Storm Drain Maintenance
Worker 24 0.01 $103,240 $1,032 -- -- -- --
City maintains
systems
All public ROW
inlets where Small
Capture Systems
are installed
• 655 locations
• 4 maintenance events per year per device
• Maintenance event (1 lead worker/
Vacuum Assisted Truck Operator and 1
maintenance staff)
• 1 hours per maintenance event
• Acquisition of 1 Vacuum Assisted Truck
City Lead Storm Drain Maintenance
Worker/ Vacuum Assisted Truck
Operator
-- -- -- -- 2620 1.31 $103,240 $135,244
City Storm Drain Maintenance
Worker - Temporary -- -- -- -- 2620 1.31 $36,100 $47,291 Vacuum Assisted Truck -- -- -- $630,000 -- -- -- $8,200 Overhead Costs NA Oversight of all tasks above City Assistant Director of Public Works 20 0.01 $330,380 $2,185 40 0.02 $339,380 $6,608
Totals 872 0.43 -- $1,369,002 5,280 2.64 -- $223,543
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 259 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 14
2.3 Trash Inspections on Private Properties
Based on preliminary source investigations conducted as part of this project, private properties with commercial, industrial, or high-density residential land uses remain important sources of trash to the City’s MS4. Stormwater and trash generated on these private properties drain to either storm drain inlets located in the adjacent public ROW or to private storm drain inlets located on the properties. To address these sources, municipalities in the San Francisco Bay Area have successfully instituted Trash Inspection Programs on private properties to address trash contributions from these properties. The trash inspection program typically entails the periodic assessment of trash levels on properties by City staff using an Onland Visual Assessment (OVTA) protocol and coordinating with property owners/managers to effectively manage trash levels. If trash levels are above an OVTA “A” score on the property during an inspection, then the City works with the property owners/managers to institute trash control measures to improve trash levels, until ultimately a consistent OVTA “A” score can be achieved. Should trash levels not improve, then the City would utilize its enforcement capabilities established through its stormwater ordinance to implement progressive enforcement actions, as necessary. Enforcement could entail requiring property owners to install and maintain trash full capture systems, so that the mandated trash reduction goal of full capture or equivalent is achieved on the property.
Existing Inspection Program
Industrial inspections are currently conducted by the City at a portion of the commercial and industrial facilities in the City of Redding to evaluate the proper functioning of restaurant grease traps and oil and water separators. The adequacy of trash management activities occurring on the property is not typically identified or evaluated as part of these inspections.
Potential Trash Inspection Program
A trash inspection program could be implemented by the City to address trash generated on private properties. The trash inspection program could entail the following:
1. Updating the City’s existing stormwater ordinance to more clearly require property owners to maintain trash generation levels at a low level or alternatively install and maintain trash full capture systems to address trash levels on their properties;
2. Formally adding an OVTA component to existing standard operating procedures used during industrial compliance inspections conducted by the City and providing periodic training to inspectors on OVTAs; and
3. Conducting targeted trash inspections at additional properties that generate significant levels of trash that are not currently inspected as part of the industrial compliance inspections using OVTA protocols, providing periodic training to inspectors on OVTAs.
Existing industrial compliance inspections would continue to occur at the same frequency and a trash component (i.e., OVTA) would be added to these inspections. If a property inspected has not achieved an “A” OVTA score, then the property would be reinspected at a set timeframe to ensure improvement in trash levels. For those properties where moderate (B) or high (C) OVTA scores were observed, enforcement and follow up inspections would be conducted by the City at a higher frequency until an “A” score is attained.
Properties not currently included in the stormwater inspection pool would be inspected once every 5- years, unless the property achieved an OVTA score of less than an “A”. For those properties where OVTA scores worse than an “A” were observed, enforcement and follow up inspections would be conducted by the City at a higher frequency. If an “A” score is not attained, requiring property owners to install their own full capture systems would be a potential step that the City could take, should other enforcement actions not succeed in reducing trash levels on the properties. The locations of properties where a trash inspection program could be implemented is included in Figure 4.
Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
Adding OVTAs to existing industrial compliance inspections will add additional time for each inspection, and thus would require additional inspection resources. Additionally, inspecting a larger pool of businesses and other private properties would also require new resources. These increases in the number of inspections conducted each year by the City would also be accompanied by additional costs associated with communications to applicable property owners to discuss/require improved trash management, the management of inspection data, and overhead/oversight costs. A preliminary, planning-level cost estimate associated with the implementation of a Trash Inspection Program is presented in Table 5.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 260 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 15
Figure 4. Overview of the private properties that generate baseline moderate, high or very high trash levels and therefore would be potentially subject to implementing new enhanced trash controls on private properties in the City of Redding.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 261 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 16
Table 5. Preliminary planning-level costs estimates for creating and implementing a trash inspection program to address trash levels on private properties in the City of Redding.
Summary of Enhancement
City Staff
Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing
Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual) Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Task
Geographical Span
of Implementation
Assumptions
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Develop and
enforce authority
to require all
private properties
that fail to meet an
OVTA ‘A’ score
during inspections,
and have privately
owned and
operated storm
drains on their
property to install
full capture
system(s)
All private properties:
- in Moderate and High
trash generating areas
- have privately owned
and operated storm
drains on their
property
-failed to meet an
OVTA ‘A’ score during
enhanced or new
business inspections
Draft and develop new or refined
ordinance giving City the authority to
require trash management on all
private properties
City Storm Water
Management
Program
Coordinator
100 0.10 $321,060 $32,106 -- -- -- --
City
Environmental
Compliance
Manager
40 0.02 $435,380 $8,708 -- -- -- --
City Assistant
Director of Public
Works
4 0.002 $330,380 $661 -- -- -- --
Review final ordinance for approval
City Assistant
Director of Public
Works
4 0.002 $330,380 $661 -- -- -- --
Review final ordinance for approval City Attorney 4 0.002 $954,200 $1,908 -- -- -- -- Add trash
inspections (i.e.,
OVTAs) to existing
industrial
compliance
inspections
conducted at
restaurants
All restaurants:
- in Moderate and High
trash generating areas
- Are part of the City's
restaurant inspection
program
• 240 properties would need to be
inspected.
• Inspections would occur on an
annual basis.
• 25% of properties would need
follow-up inspections. Assumes 60
follow-up inspections would be
needed per year.
• An additional 0.5 hours per
inspection would be needed due to
adding trash inspection component
City Inspector -- -- -- -- 135 0.07 $291,040 $19,645
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 17
Summary of Enhancement
City Staff
Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing
Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual) Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Task
Geographical Span
of Implementation
Assumptions
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Conduct trash
inspections and
determine if private
drainage is present
(i.e., OVTAs) at
applicable
properties that are
NOT part of the
restaurant
inspection
program.
All private properties:
- in Moderate and High
trash generating areas
- have privately owned
and operated storm
drains on their
property
- Are NOT part of the
City's restaurant
inspection program
• A total of 1,265 properties would
need to be inspected over the course
of 9 years (~141/year)
• 25% of the properties would need
follow-up inspections. Assumes ~ 35
follow-up inspections would be
needed per year
• 1 hour per inspection (including
travel time)
City Inspector -- -- -- -- 176 0.1 $291,040 $25,567
Communications to
applicable property
owners to
discuss/require
improved trash
management or
transition to full
capture.
All private properties:
- in Moderate and High
trash generating areas
- Are NOT part of the
City's restaurant
inspection program
- Are NOT achieving an
"A" OVTA score
• Assumes communications for
properties being inspected via
restaurant inspections but not
achieving OVTA "A" will be handled
via follow-up inspections. No costs
for these properties in this line item.
• Estimated 25% of properties
including those that are either part of
the restaurant inspection program or
not part of the restaurant inspection
program will NOT achieve OVTA "A"
score by follow-up inspections and
will need to implement full trash
capture or other new controls.
Communication costs for these
properties are in this line item.
City Inspector -- -- -- -- 40 0.02 $291,040 $5,821
Management of
inspection data.
Enter all data
collected via trash
inspections into the
excel database.
Flag facilities that
require follow-up
inspections
All private properties:
- in Moderate and High
trash generating areas
- have privately owned
and operated storm
drains on their
property
• 381 data entries per year
• 10 minutes per data entry City Inspector -- -- -- -- 63 0.03 $291,040 $9,230
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 18
Summary of Enhancement
City Staff
Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing
Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual) Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Task
Geographical Span
of Implementation
Assumptions
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Overhead Costs NA Provide oversight of above projects
City Storm Water
Management
Program
Coordinator
100 0.05 $321,060 $16,053 60 0.03 $321,060 $9,632
City
Environmental
Compliance
Manager
40 0.02 $435,380 $8,708 40 0.02 $435,380 $8,708
For properties
where low trash
generation cannot
be achieved, notify
all applicable
property
owners/managers
that full capture
systems are
required by a
certain date
Coordinates development of model
communications. Identify property
owners/managers, perform data
analysis and compilation.
City Storm Water
Management
Program
Coordinator
-- -- -- -- 40 0.02 $321,060 $6,421
Reviews communications City Attorney -- -- -- -- 8 0.004 $954,200 $3,817 Totals 292 0.246 -- $68,804 562 0.294 -- $88,840
a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 19
2.4 Curb-Inlet Screens on Inlets in the Public ROW
Curb inlet screens are treatment devices that block trash from entering a catch basin/inlet. These devices have some level of trash reduction benefit; however, they have not been well studied and are not certified/approved as trash full capture systems by the State Water Resources Control Board as full capture systems. Curb-inlet screens may
be retractable or fixed in place, and
generally have a perforated screen or
evenly spaced bars that are designed to
fit outside of, or immediately within the
storm drain curb opening. Retractable
screens open either manually or
hydraulically when a stormwater runoff
applies enough force on the screen. Since
curb-inlet screens block trash and debris
from entering the storm drain inlet or
storm drain, trash remains in the street
and is removed by regular street
sweeping or other measures.
Curb-inlet screens in combination with inlet-based full capture systems are currently used as trash control measures by many municipalities throughout California. Because they are not approved/certified as trash full capture systems, curb-inlet screens are often used to supplement inlet-based systems by blocking trash and debris before entering inlets, which reduces the frequency of inlet maintenance. The ability of curb-inlet screens alone to achieve full capture equivalency (i.e., low trash generation) has not been fully evaluated until recently.
Curb-inlet screens could benefit the City’s trash reduction program by preventing trash from reaching storm drain inlets/catch basins and being discharged via the City’s MS4. It could specifically help inlets in the City of Redding that drain directly into storm pipes that are larger or have greater flow than a small full capture device can handle. When properly maintained, curb-inlet screens can be effective at preventing trash from entering catch basins. Although there is not currently a widely accepted value for the trash reduction benefits that curb-inlet screens offer, curb-inlet screens have the potential to reduce a trash generating area to one score below its current trash generation rate (e.g., “B” score to “A” score) (EOA, In prep).
For this control measure, the installation of curb-inlet screens in moderate trash generating PLU areas where street sweeping is already occurring at least two times per month is the approach evaluated below. This control measure only targets moderate trash generating areas; no high trash generating areas will be treated with curb inlet screens. In the future, curb-inlet screens may be considered as a control measure for high trash generating areas, however, current studies only determined curb-inlet screen effective in moderate trash generating areas. A fully encompassing curb-inlet screen implementation program in moderate trash generating areas could help the City achieve approximately 25% trash reduction. The acceptable trash reduction benefit associated with curb-inlet screens is currently under discussion with San Francisco Bay Regional Water Board staff and could set some level of precedent on a state-wide level.
Existing Curb-Inlet Screens
Currently, no curb-inlet screens are installed on storm drain inlets in the City’s public ROW.
Potential Installation and location of Curb-Inlet Screens There are roughly 1,315 inlets in the public ROW that are in areas with moderate or high trash generation in the City. Of these inlets, an estimated 716 have curb inlets that may support the installation of curbinlet screens. This includes some of the inlets that have the potential for small trash full capture systems, as well as inlets where it does not appear feasible to install/maintain small trash full capture systems. Of the 716 inlets, 312 inlets drain areas with moderate trash generation and the streets associated with the inlets have street sweeping that occurs at least two times a month. These 312 inlets serve as the potential pool where curb-inlet screens could be installed (Figure 5). Of the 312 inlets in the pool, the City could choose to install curb-inlet screens in all or a portion of these inlets.
Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
For the purposes of estimating the costs of implementing a curb-inlet screen program, it is assumed that the City would purchase and have a vendor install curb-inlet screens on all 312 inlets in the City’s public Curb-inlet Screen
(Courtesy of State of Hawaii Department of Transportation)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 20
ROW. The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the fabrication, installation, and operation of the new 312 curb-inlet screen devices are presented in Table 6.
Figure 5. Overview of the locations for 312 potential curb-inlet screens in the City of Redding.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 266 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 21
Table 6. Preliminary planning-level costs estimates for installing and maintaining 312 curb-inlet screens in the City of Redding.
Summary of Enhancement
City Staff
Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing Annual FTE
Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual)
Annual FTE
Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Task Geographical Span of
Implementation Assumptions
Hours Portion of
FTEa
Hours Portion of
FTEa
City develops
concept and
releases bid/RFP
for curb-inlet
screens
312 public ROW inlets in
Moderate trash
generating
All planning tasks conducted by City Staff
City Program
Coordinator- Storm
Drains
200 0.1 $260,900 $26,090 -- -- -- --
Vendor fabricates
and Installs Curbinlet Screens312 Public Row Inlets
• Contractor installs devices
• Capital costs can range from $400 to $700.
Costs of each inlet screen are assumed to
be $500
• Replacement of each inlet device twice
during a 50-yr timeframe (i.e., average
replacement rate of 12 screens/yr) at
$500/screen
Materials Cost -- -- -- $156,000 -- -- -- $6,000
Oversight of
contractor
installation Inlets installed in all
public ROW inlets in
Moderate trash
generating areas
• Contractor fabricates and installs curb-inlet
screens
• City staff oversight over installation,
including initial inspection of devices.
City Storm Drain
Utility Supervisor 100 0.05 $168,700 $8,435 -- -- -- -- On-going oversight
of
replacement/repair
process by
contractor
• 2 inspections per year of each inlet to check
for damage and repairs.
• 10 minutes per inspection
City Storm Drain
Maintenance Worker
- Temporary
-- -- -- -- 104 0.05 $36,100 $1,877
Oversight of all
tasks above NA Provide oversight of above projects
City Assistant
Director of Public
Works
20 0.01 $330,380 $3,304 20 0.01 $330,380 $3,304
Totals 320 0.16 -- $193,829 124 0.06 -- $11,181
a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 22
2.5 Expanded On-land Cleanups
Cleanups that remove trash from streets, sidewalks,
and adjacent properties can have a significant impact
on the levels of trash in the City’s MS4. On-land
cleanups consist of manual removal of trash by
agency staff, contractors hired as part of an
association or business improvement districts (BIDs),
or volunteers. These cleanups target known trash
generating areas or dumping sites where street
sweepers cannot access or effectively remove trash.
On-land cleanups can help decrease trash levels that
reach MS4s from these trash-prone/less accessible
areas. Based on literature reviews conducted, the
effectiveness of on-land cleanup in reducing trash
reaching the stormwater conveyance system has not been evaluated in the context of FCSE. That said, conducting consistent on-land cleanups could conceptually sustain an improved level of trash (i.e., low generation) in areas with moderate or high baseline trash levels. The magnitude (frequency) and extent (location) to which cleanups would need to be conducted to observe reductions in trash to acceptable levels (i.e., FCSE) is likely dependent upon the baseline level of trash generation that occurs in the area.
The higher the trash generation, the more frequent trash would need to be removed to achieve FCSE.
The costs associated with on-land cleanups will be site-specific and dependent on the type (e.g., agency staff, contractor or volunteers) and number of individuals needed for the cleanup events, and the frequency of cleanups that would need to occur. Reductions associated with the cleanups would need to be observed via OVTAs conducted by City staff or contractors.
An estimate of the trash reduction benefits of implementing an enhanced/expanded on-land cleanup program is generally unknown but could be estimated based on a set of assumptions regarding the frequency and extent of the cleanup activities, and the baseline trash generation levels within the areas where the expanded cleanup program is being implemented.
Existing On-land Cleanup Program
The City has a number of active on-land cleanup activities currently underway. There is an Adopt-a-Block Program in TMA 1 (downtown) where citizens or businesses can commit to cleaning trash up on a specific City block. This program currently covers roughly 6.5 curb miles of streets. A Business Improvement District (BID) that funds maintenance for landscaping and keeping the downtown area clean is also active in TMA 1. Additionally, the City’s Solid Waste Team removes trash from illegal dumping sites or homeless encampments on a periodic basis. The City uses the community work program, which gives those that are incarcerated the option to clean up trash instead of spending their days in prison, to assist with homeless and illegal dumping cleanup events. Other cleanup programs are conducted by the City in collaboration with Bethel School (known as City Project) and local fly-fishing groups, and most frequently focus on cleanups in park and within rivers.
Potential Expansion of On-land Cleanups
Enhancements to the existing on-land cleanup programs in the City could involve reinforcing and expanding the current Adopt-a-Block program to the other areas of the City with a goal of another 10 curb miles being adopted and cleaned. An Adopt-a Drain program could also be developed and managed in parallel with the Adopt-a-Block program. Additional blocks in TMA 1 would benefit most, while TMA 2 and TMA 6 appear like they could also use an Adopt-a-Block and/or Adopt-a-Drain program. Additionally, there are opportunities to create new BIDs in TMAs 3 and 4 and along Lake Boulevard near the intersection of Highway 273. Most cleanups currently focus on undeveloped non-PLU areas and therefore new on-land cleanups would need to pivot to concentrate on moderate and high trash generating areas.
The City could also coordinate additional volunteer cleanups that could take place more frequently (e.g., monthly) in targeted neighborhoods. The events could strive to draw local volunteers to spur pride in their communities and could possibly receive assistance from the Shasta Support Service, a local nonprofit volunteer group. Clean-ups in industrial areas or along arterial roads could also be conducted by contractors or by employing individuals that are currently homeless. Working with local non-profit organizations, other cities in California have seen great success with hiring homeless to remove trash from City streets and areas, and using the opportunity to provide job skills and social services to those that are currently unsheltered in the community. Enhanced cleanups using homeless individuals would be most effective in TMAs 7 and 10.
Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the planning and implementation of an enhanced On-land Cleanup Program throughout the City is presented in Table 7.
Members of the Shasta County Sheriffs Alternative Custody Program assisting in collecting trash from an illegal encampment (Courtesy of the Redding Police Department)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 23
Table 7. Preliminary planning-level costs estimates for Expanded On-land Cleanups in the City of Redding.
Summary of Enhancement
City Staff
Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing Annual FTE Rate
(Fully Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual)
Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Enhancements Costs Geographical Span of
Implementation Assumptions
Hours Portion of FTEa Hours Portion of FTEa
Expand existing
Adopt-a-Block
and develop
Adopt-a-Drain
program
TMAs 1, 2 and/or 6
Outreach to new areas for Adopt-aBlock/Adopt-a-Street and citywide outreach for Adopt-a-Drain
City Outreach and
Monitoring
Coordinator
40 0.02 $321,060 $6,421 -- -- -- --
Coordination with volunteers and
program management
City Parks and
Facilities Supervisor -- -- -- -- 40 0.02 $189,500 $3,790 Develop
additional BID
TMAs 3, 4 and/or 8
(along Lake Blvd)
• Outreach to businesses and hold public
meeting to discuss BID development
for potential members
• Assumes 2-hour meeting with 8 hours
of preparation and 4 days of outreach
City Outreach and
Monitoring
Coordinator
40 0.02 $321,060 $6,421 -- -- -- --
Ongoing BID coordination with
businesses
City Outreach and
Monitoring
Coordinator
-- -- -- -- 40 0.02 $321,060 $6,421
Implement a
monthly
volunteer
cleanup in
neighborhoods.
Residential and
commercial
neighborhoods with
Moderate and High
trash generating areas
Staff identify feasible areas for cleaning Deputy Director of Solid Waste -- -- -- -- 20 0.01 $307,100 $3,071
• Staff will coordinate and participate in
new events
• Assumes 12 events per year at 8 hours
per event, including coordination
City Outreach and
Monitoring
Coordinator
-- -- -- -- 96 0.05 $321,060 $16,053
Employ
homeless to
perform onland cleanups
of trash
Industrial areas and
along arterial roads in
Moderate and High
trash generating areas
in TMA 7 and to a
lesser degree in TMA
10 Increase workload of City Community
Service Officer by 80 hours per month to
work with homeless
City Community
Service Officer
(Police Officer)
-- -- -- -- 960 0.48 $95,480 $45,830
Overhead Costs NA
• Pick up and disposal of trash at
volunteer and homeless on-land
cleanup events
• 2 staff to pick up and dispose of trash
• Assumes 1 hour per trash pickup
City Solid Waste
Truck Driver -- -- -- -- 60 0.03 $117,460 $3,524
City Solid Waste
Worker -- -- -- -- 60 0.03 $79,180 $2,375
Equipment needed for disposal including
bags, gloves and a truck Materials cost -- -- -- -- -- -- -- $500 Provide oversight of above Tasks Deputy Director of
Solid Waste -- -- -- -- 20 0.01 $307,100 $3,071
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 269 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 24
Totals 80 0.04 -- $12,842 1,296 0.65 -- $84,636 a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 270 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 25
2.6 Enhanced Public Container/Bin Management
Public container and bin management can significantly reduce the amount of trash observed on publicly accessible areas that is due to pedestrian litter. Management of these receptacles involves ensuring that they are in placed in areas most convenient to deposition, that an effective type of receptacle is used, and that the receptacles are maintained to prevent scavenging and overflow of trash. It is imperative that public containers are easily accessible and visible to pedestrians to incentivize throwing trash in a receptacle instead of littering. This means installing enough public containers in high-traffic areas to reduce the risk of littering.
While traditional outdoor trash receptacles are the most common, Big Belly trash compactors are unique because they use solar power to compress trash and have been shown to be effective in areas with high trash volume. Dumpsters are most frequently used by commercial enterprises or apartment complexes and should be managed properly to ensure that open lids or “dumpster diving” does not contribute to the spread of trash. Residential bins require pick-up of trash on a regular basis to prevent overflow of trash and higher potential for scavenging.
Properly managing these public and private trash receptacles can help decrease trash levels that reach MS4s. Conducting effective and consistent public container and bin management could conceptually sustain an improved level of trash (i.e., low generation) in areas with moderate or high baseline trash levels. The magnitude (frequency) and extent (location) to which management would need to be conducted to observe reductions in trash to acceptable levels (i.e., FCSE) is likely dependent upon the baseline level of trash generation that occurs in the area. For areas of higher trash generation, more bins and an increased level of protection and maintenance would be needed to achieve FCSE. The costs associated with enhanced public container and bin management will be site-specific and dependent on the type (e.g., agency staff or contractor) and number of individuals needed for the installation and servicing of the bins. An estimate of the trash reduction benefits of implementing enhanced public container and bin management is generally unknown, but could be estimated based on a set of assumptions regarding the frequency and extent of the trash receptacle management, and the baseline trash generation levels within the areas where the additional receptacles are being implemented.
Existing Public Container/Bin Management Program
There are currently 18 Big Belly trash compactors installed across the City of Redding. These receptacles have proven to be tamper proof, which helps prevent scavenging. Big Belly provides maintenance of these receptacles that the City leases. The City has a Solid Waste app to answer questions on bin management and report issues. Residents and businesses can rent dumpsters and drop boxes. The Solid Waste program has worked hard to prevent scavenging from dumpsters, through a number of tamper proof mechanisms. However, scavenging from public containers still remains a source of trash in the City.
Potential Expansion of Public Container/Bin Management
Enhancements to the existing public container and bin management efforts could include installing additional Big Belly trash receptacles in areas of moderate and high trash generation with high pedestrian traffic or currently overflowing trash receptacles. The results from recent field visits suggest that while the City has a sufficient number of trash receptacles in most areas, scavenging by homeless remains an issue that Big Belly trash receptacles could help prevent. Big Belly receptacles could be installed in additional locations throughout TMA 1 (downtown) as well as in TMAs 3 and 4, where it appears that there is a lack of public receptacles.
In addition to installing additional public trash containers, it is recommended that the City consider developing an improved mobile app to better track illegal dumping and littering issues and respond in a more efficient manner. Although the City has a solid waste app to help residents and businesses understand trash pickups and report issues, using the “See-Click-Fix” app may further assist the City in identifying areas that require bin management. The app allows users to report issues to the City with a reference location, and in Redding users could report overflowing bins and dumpsters, areas without available bins and areas where illegal dumping or littering is prevalent.
Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the planning and implementation of an enhanced public container and bin management program throughout the City is presented in Table 8.
Big Belly Solar Trash Bin/Compactor
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 26
Table 8. Preliminary planning-level costs estimates for enhancing Public Container/Bin Management in the City of Redding.
Summary of Enhancement City Staff
Implementing
Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing
Annual FTE
Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(Annual)
Annual FTE
Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Enhancements Costs Geographical Span of
Implementation Assumptions
Hours Portion of FTEa Hours Portion of FTEa
Install new/additional
Big Belly Trash
Compactors
TMAs 1, 3 and 4
Installation of 20 new Big Belly
receptacles
City Solid Waste
Worker
(Calculations
assumes 2
workers)
60 0.03 $79,180 $2,375 -- -- -- --
Trash-pickup (assumes 10 pickups per
year at 1 hour each)
City Solid Waste
Worker -- -- -- -- 200 0.1 $79,180 $7,918
Leasing Costs (assumes $3000 per can
per year) -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- $60,000
Implement utilization
of See-Click-Fix App Entire City
Outreach to residents and businesses
about See-Click-Fix
City Outreach
and Monitoring
Coordinator
100 0.05 $321,060 $16,053 -- -- -- --
Cost of purchasing See-Click-Fix -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- $8,700 Respond to See-Click-Fix Issues
City Solid Waste
Worker
(Calculations
assumes 2
workers)
-- -- -- -- 200 0.1 $79,180 $7,918
Overhead Costs NA Provide oversight of above tasks Deputy Director of Solid Waste -- -- -- -- 40 0.02 $307,100 $6,142
Totals 160 0.08 -- $18,428 440 0.22 -- $90,678
a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 27
2.7 Enhanced City-wide Public Education and Outreach Program Education and outreach programs are designed to raise citizen awareness about the impacts of littering or illegal dumping and teach citizens how to change their behavior accordingly. Programs usually include a mixture of anti-littering advocacy, reinforced with the development of classroom curricula, storm drain signage and volunteer cleanups. To effectively target audiences, program managers need to have a strong understanding of the behaviors and attitudes of litterers before developing an outreach program.
Programs can change people's attitudes, but implementation needs to be consistent over time to maintain performance. It is difficult to estimate the percentage reduction that the City may achieve through implementing an enhanced City-wide public education and outreach program, however, EOA staff have qualitatively estimated that an enhanced program implemented as described in this section could offer a 5% maximum trash reduction in the City by 2030.
Existing Public Education and Outreach Program
The existing stormwater public education program
in the City is primarily facilitated by each school.
Some elementary and high school students attend
presentations on watershed health and stormwater
pollutants and take tours of the water treatment
plant. The outreach component of the program
hosts local cleanup events and develops PSA’s
including “DrakenBill”, two rubber ducks who
emphasize the importance of stormwater
management.
Potential Enhancement of Public Education and Outreach Program Expansion of the community outreach and education program could benefit overall trash load reduction by promoting litter prevention initiatives. Opportunities for growth in public education could involve additional school programs for middle schoolers potentially taught by high schoolers. Enhancement of the outreach program could include developing new initiatives such as a “Clean Street” campaign or further use of the “DrakenBill” PSA series. Schools were noted as significant sources of trash in EOA’s recent source investigation. Ephemeral events or programs mean a lack of reinforcement for the community in maintaining clean watershed objectives. By introducing storm water pollution prevention throughout schooling and keeping these initiatives and programs consistent over time, students and communities will engrain these concepts into the culture of the City.
Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the planning and implementation of an enhanced city-wide public education and outreach program throughout the City is presented in Table 9.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 273 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 28
Table 9. Preliminary Planning-Level Costs Estimates for an Enhanced City-Wide Public Education and Outreach Program in the City of Redding.
Summary of Enhancement
City Staff Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing
Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(annual)
Annual
FTE Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated Costs
Task Geographical Span
of Implementation Assumptions
Hours Portion of FTEa Hours Portion of FTEa
Expansion of
outreach and
education program to
involve additional
school programs for
middle schoolers
Middle schools in the City
City staff will develop and
coordinate further
education programs and
provide training to
volunteers to present to
classrooms and student
groups, and will participate
in the implementation of
the program
City Outreach and Monitoring
Coordinator 300 0.15 $321,060 $48,159 200 0.1 $321,060 $32,106 City Storm Water Management
Program Coordinator 100 0.05 $321,060 $16,053 200 0.1 $321,060 $32,106 Flat rate cost estimate for
educational materials Materials cost NA NA NA -- NA NA NA $1000 Implement an
outreach messaging
campaign
City-wide- will conduct
outreach on social media
and may conduct direct
outreach at businesses,
industrial facilities, schools,
parks
City staff develops and
implements social media
campaign
City Outreach and
Monitoring Coordinator 160 0.08 $321,060 $25,685 100 0.05 $321,060 $16,053 City Storm Water Management
Program Coordinator 40 0.02 $321,060 $6,421 100 0.05 $321,060 $16,053 Flat rate cost estimate for
outreach materials Materials cost NA NA NA -- NA NA NA $1000 Overhead Costs NA Provide oversight of above
projects
Environmental Compliance
Manager
20 0.01 $435,380 $4,354 20 0.01 $435,380 $4,354
Totals 620 0.31 -- $100,672 620 0.31 -- $102,672
a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 29
2.8 Municipal Ordinance – Single-use Plastic Food Service Ware The City of Berkeley and San Mateo Unincorporated
County recently adopted a comprehensive Singleuse Plastic Food Service Ware Ordinance that will ultimately ban the use and distribution of plastic
single-use takeout food-ware for all food vendors.
Adopting a similar ordinance would reduce the
amount of single-use takeout food-ware in the City,
which is a main source of trash in the City of
Redding. Reducing the amount of single-use takeout
food-ware would contribute to trash reduction in
the City as a whole. Reductions associated with the
ordinance would need to be observed via OVTAs
conducted by City staff or contractors. Based on
previous studies evaluating the types of trash in
MS4s and the successes that municipalities have
had in the Bay Area in reducing the use of single-use
expanded polystyrene food ware, it is anticipated
that the adoption, implementation and
enforcement of a comprehensive Single-use Plastic
Food Service Ware Ordinance could assist the City in reducing up to 15% of the litter observed on streets and sidewalks.
Existing Single-Use Foodware Trash Control
The City does not currently have an ordinance in place relating to single-use plastic food ware or EPS. The City has implemented the following actions to reduce the use/distribution of litter-prone items:
Single-Use Plastic Bag Ordinance
The Single-Use plastic bag ordinance banned single-use plastic bag use in the City and installed a fee on paper and reusable plastic bags. The Single-Use plastic bag ordinance went into effect on November 2018. This ordinance is implemented to reduce the environmental impact of singleuse bag litter in the City.
Enhanced Source Control Actions
The enhanced control measure identified is for the City to develop, adoption, implement and enforce a comprehensive Single-use Plastic Food Service Ware Ordinance.
Cost Estimates for Enhanced Actions
The preliminary, planning-level cost estimates associated with the planning and implementation of a Single-use Plastic Food Service Ware Ordinance in the City of Redding is presented in Table 10.
Example Public Education Materials on a New Single-Use
Foodware Ordinance
(Courtesy of the City/County of San Francisco)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 30
Table 10. Preliminary Planning-Level Costs estimates for adopting and implementing a Single-use Plastic Food Service Ware Ordinance.
Summary of Enhancement
City Staff Implementing Task
Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks
Estimated Staffing
Annual FTE
Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Costs
Estimated Staffing
(annual)
Annual FTE
Rate
(Fully
Burdened)
Estimated
Tasks Costs
Geographical
Span of
Implementation
Assumptions
Hours
Portion
of FTEa
Hours Portion
of FTEa
Draft a single-use plastic food
ware ban ordinance and
provide staff support on the
adoption and implementation
of this ordinance. Ordinance
could include items such as
cups, lids, utensils, straws,
clamshells, and other
disposable items.
Entire City
Assumes the City will use similar
ordinances (i.e. Berkeley, Bay
Area Counties) as a draft
template, minimizing planning
hours
City Environmental
Compliance Manager 500 0.25 $435,380 $108,845 -- -- -- -- Create outreach to applicable
businesses on the ordinance,
alternative products, etc.
Coordinate communications
with business owners.
Create and implement an
outreach program to advertise
new ordinance
City Outreach and
Monitoring Coordinator 500 0.25 $321,060 $80,265 -- -- -- -- Outreach Materials Cost NA -- -- -- $1,000 -- -- -- --
Inspect businesses to enforce
the single-use plastic food ware
ban
• Assumes 1200 of 1568
commercial business will be
inspected for compliance
with ordinance
• Assumes 1 hour per
inspection (Includes driving
time and tracking/data
entry)
City Inspector -- -- -- -- 1200 0.6 $291,040 $176,624
Overhead Costs Provide oversight of above
tasks
City Environmental Compliance
Manager 20 0.01 $271,900 $2,719 20 0.01 $435,380 $4,354 Totals 1020 0.51 -- $192,829 1220 0.61 -- $178,978
a One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) position is assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 31
2.9 Summary of Potential New or Enhanced Source Controls The estimated costs and potential trash reduction benefits of implementing new or enhanced trash control measures described in the previous sections are summarized in Table 11. Costs are presented as base/initial costs, on-going/annual costs, and 50-year lifecycle costs. Base/initial costs are associated with design and capital (i.e., construction/fabrication, installation, etc.) for large and small full capture systems, and the development, adoption, and upfront costs for institutional and source controls. On-going/annual costs are associated with the on-going costs to the City to maintain, implement, replace, and/or enforce the trash control measure. 50-year lifecycle costs are based on the sum of base/initial costs and the average annual implementation costs over a 50-year timeframe. Lifecycle costs have not been adjusted for inflation and assume that average on-going/annual costs would remain consistent of the 50-year timeframe. The cost estimates presented in Table 11 are used in Section 3.0 to compare multiple trash control measure implementation scenarios that are designed to achieve the California statewide goal of full capture or equivalency for trash generated in PLU areas.
The estimated maximum trash reduction benefit for each control measure is also included in Table 11.
The maximum benefit is based on the City’s baseline trash generation map and assumes for structural controls that the City would receive additional (offsetting) reduction by addressing trash from non-PLU areas, which are largely associated with streets/roadways. Where trash reduction benefit information was not available for a specific control measure, best professional judgement was used to estimate the maximum potential benefit of implementing a control measure.
Table 11. Summary of the preliminary planning level cost estimate and trash reduction benefits of implementing potential new or enhanced trash control measures. a
Control Measure Base/Initial Tasks
On-going/Annual
Tasks
50-Year Lifecycle Costs
Estimated
Maximum
Potential
Trash
Reduction
Large Trash Full Capture
Systems
$4,564,287 $59,278 $7,528,193 ~ 39%c
Small Trash Full Capture
Systems $1,369,002 $223,543 $12,546,152 ~ 57%d
Trash Inspections of
Private Properties b $68,804 $88,840 $4,510,814 ~ 55%
Publicly-Owned Curb
Inlet Screens $193,829 $11,181 $752,879 ~ 25%
Expanded On-Land
Cleanups $12,842 $84,636 $4,244,632 --
e
Enhanced Public
Container/Bin
Management
$18,428 $90,678 $4,552,328 --
e
Enhanced City-Wide
Public Education and
Outreach Program
$100,672 $102,672 $5,234,262 ~ 5%f
Municipal Ordinance –
Single-use Plastic Food
Service Ware
$192,829 $178,978 $9,141,719 ~ 15%g
a These values are calculated using the 2020 value of the US dollar. b These values combine properties that drain to the public ROW and properties that drain to inlets on private properties into one cost estimate.
In some scenario sections, these categories will be split with a proportion of the total cost estimates that is consistent with the proportion of acreage that each category holds in the City.
c Reduction benefits include addressing trash from PLU areas within catchments FTC01B, FTC01C-3, FTC03A-1, and FTC04E. d Reduction benefits include addressing trash from all PLU areas. e Estimates vary based on frequency and where on-land cleanups and public container/bin management occur, thus no maximum reductions were calculated.
f This is a qualitative estimate based the maximum demonstrated reduction by a public education and outreach program. g Based on information regarding the estimated proportion of trash in stormwater that is single-use plastic food ware (i.e., SF Bay Trash Generation Rates Study – BASMAA 2014), and the estimated effectiveness of the potential ordinance.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 32
3. Trash Control Measure Implementation Scenarios
There are a number of different combinations of the trash control measure implementation scenarios that the City could choose to implement to enhance the reduction of trash in stormwater and address the goal established in the Trash Amendments. Four implementation scenarios are described in this section (Table 12). Each scenario was selected based on existing information on the benefits of the associated control measures included in each scenario. It is estimated that each scenario could achieve the full capture or equivalency trash reduction goal in the City if fully implemented. The preliminary planning level cost estimates for each scenario are also included in this section.
Table 12. Implementation scenarios for new/enhanced trash control measures designed to achieve the goal of the Trash Amendments (i.e., full capture or equivalent in all PLU areas) in the City of Redding.
Implementation
Scenario Large Trash Full Capture
Systems Small Trash Full Capture Systems Trash Inspections (including OVTAs) on Private Property Enhanced Public Container/Bin Management Curb-inlet screens on Inlets in the Public ROW Expanded On-Land Cleanups Enhanced City-Wide Public Education and Outreach Municipal Ordinance – Single-use Plastic Food
Service Ware OVTAs on Public Streets & Sidewalks
1 • • •
2 • •
3 • • • • • •
4 • • • • • • •
These four scenarios are organized in the following way:
• Scenario 1 includes the installation of four (4) large trash full capture systems described in section
2.1 and outlined in the City’s Trash Full Capture System Feasibility Evaluation (Appendix B), the installation of 368 small trash full capture systems in areas outside of the catchments for the four large systems, and the implementation of a trash inspection program to address trash on properties that don’t drain to the public ROW.
• Scenario 2 is a modification of Scenario 1, where the actions listed in Scenario 1 are implemented, but instead of installing large trash capture systems in the four catchments, an additional (287) small trash full capture systems are installed and maintained. • Scenario 3 includes the installation of four (4) large trash full capture systems as outlined in section 2.1, the implementation of a trash inspection program to address trash on properties that don’t drain to the public ROW, the installation and maintenance of 312 curb-inlet screens to address trash in the public ROW, and the expansion of on-land cleanup programs. • Scenario 4 includes a set of six (6) institutional and source control measures, and excludes the installation of large or small trash full capture systems.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 33
3.1 Scenario 1: Trash Full Capture - Large and Small Systems In scenario 1 the City would install and maintain large full capture systems at four (4) catchment locations and 368 small trash full capture systems in inlets in the public ROW that are outside of the catchments for the large full capture systems. These actions would address all trash-generating areas in the City that drain to the public ROW via a combination of large and small trash full capture systems. Additionally, the City would develop and implement a trash inspection program to address trash on private properties that enters the City’s MS4 through storm drain inlets located on private properties. City staff would conduct OVTAs to verify low trash generation via the inspections. No additional institutional or source controls would be implemented under this scenario. The preliminary planning level costs associated with this scenario are included in Table 13. There is a relatively high level of confidence in this scenario achieving the overall trash reduction goal established by the Trash Amendments.
Table 13. Preliminary planning level cost estimates for implementing Scenario 1.
3.2 Scenario 2: Trash Full Capture - Small Systems
In scenario 2, the City would install and maintain small trash full capture systems in all 655 inlets in the public ROW that are associated with moderate or high trash generating areas. No large full capture systems would be installed in this scenario. Additionally, the City would develop and implement a trash inspection program to address trash on private properties that drain to storm drain inlets located on private properties. City staff would conduct OVTAs to verify low trash generation via the inspections. No additional institutional or source controls would be implemented under this scenario. The preliminary planning level costs associated with this scenario are included in Table 14. There is a relatively high level of confidence in this scenario achieving the overall trash reduction goal.
Table 14. Preliminary planning level cost estimates for implementing Scenario 2.
Control Measure Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks 50 Year Lifecycle Costs 655 Publicly-Owned Small Full Capture
Systems (all areas) $1,369,002 $223,543 $12,546,152
Trash Inspection Program on Private
Properties $68,804 $88,840 $4,510,814
Totals $1,437,806 $312,383 $17,056,956
Control Measure Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks 50 Year Lifecycle Costs Large Full Capture Systems at
four (4) locations $4,564,287 $59,278 $7,528,193
368 Small Trash Full Capture
Systems (outside of
Catchments for Large Trash
Full Capture Systems)
$1,082,002 $145,698 $8,366,902
Trash Inspection Program on
Private Properties $68,804 $88,840 $4,510,814
Totals $5,715,093 $293,816 $20,405,893
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 34
3.3 Scenario 3: Large Full Capture Systems & Multiple Institutional and Source Controls
In this scenario, all remaining significant trash generating areas would be addressed by:
• Fifteen large trash full capture systems at four catchment locations; • Trash Inspection Program to identify trash levels on private properties and requires property owners to implement additional actions to reduce trash to a low trash generating level or install a full capture system;
• Enhanced Public Container/Bin Management;
• 312 Curb Inlet Screens installed on inlets in the public ROW; • Expanded On-land Cleanups; and
• In addition to OVTAs conducted as part of the Trash Inspection Program on private properties, the City conducts OVTAs at selected locations on streets and sidewalks to verify reductions associated with public container management and expanded on-land cleanups.4 The preliminary planning level costs associated with this scenario are included in Table 15. There is a relatively moderate level of confidence in this scenario achieving the overall trash reduction goal.
Table 15. Preliminary planning level cost estimates for implementing Scenario 3.
Control Measure/ Action Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks 50 Year Lifecycle Costs 15 Large Full Capture Systems at 4
catchment locations $4,564,287 $59,278 $7,528,193
Trash Inspections on Private Properties $68,804 $88,840 $4,510,814 Enhanced Public Container/Bin
Management $18,428 $90,678 $4,552,328
Curb-inlet Screens on inlets in the Public
ROW $193,829 $11,181 $752,879
Expanded On-Land Cleanups $12,842 $84,636 $4,244,632
OVTAs on Streets/Sidewalks to Assess
Progress $10,000 $4,500 $235,000
Totals $4,868,191 $339,113 $21,823,847
4 Assumes OVTAs are conducted by two City staff or consultants at ($100,000 FTE Salary). OVTAs are conducted 3x/year at approximately 30 sites that are each 500 feet in length on average. Each assessment takes roughly 0.5 hrs, including travel time.
Also assumes that data are managed in a relatively efficient manner with limited costs.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 35
3.4 Scenario 4: Only Institutional and Source Controls
In this scenario, all remaining moderate or high trash generating areas would be addressed solely by additional institutional and source controls. No new full capture systems are installed as part of this implementation scenario. The following institutional and source controls would be implemented:
• Trash Inspection Program to identify trash levels on private properties and requires property owners to implement additional actions to reduce trash to a low trash generating level or install a full capture system(s);
• Enhanced Public Container/Bin Management;
• 312 Curb-Inlet Screens installed on inlets in the public ROW; • Expanded On-land Cleanups;
• Enhanced City-wide Public Education and Outreach Program for Litter; • A New Municipal Ordinance – Single-use Plastic Food Service Ware; and • In addition to OVTAs conducted as part of the Trash Inspection Program on private properties, the City conducts OVTAs at selected locations on streets and sidewalks to verify reductions associated with public container management and expanded on-land cleanups.5 The preliminary planning level costs associated with this scenario are included in Table 16. There is a relatively moderate level of confidence in this scenario achieving the overall trash reduction goal.
Table 16. Preliminary planning level cost estimates for implementing Scenario 4.
Control Measure/ Action Base/Initial Tasks On-going/Annual Tasks 50 Year Lifecycle Costs Trash Inspections on Private Properties $68,804 $88,840 $4,510,814 Enhanced Public Container/Bin
Management $18,428 $90,678 $4,552,328
Curb-inlet Screens on inlets in the Public
ROW $193,829 $11,181 $752,879
Expanded On-Land Cleanups $12,842 $84,636 $4,244,632
Enhanced City-Wide Public Education and
Outreach $100,672 $102,672 $5,234,262
Municipal Ordinance – Single Use Plastic
Food Service Ware $134,549 $94,447 $4,856,899
OVTAs on Streets/Sidewalks to Assess
Progress $12,500 $6,000 $312,500
Totals $541,625 $478,454 $24,464,314
5 Assumes OVTAs are conducted by two City staff or consultants at ($100,000 FTE Salary). OVTAs are conducted 3x/year at approximately 40 sites that are each 500 feet in length on average. Each assessment takes roughly 0.5 hrs, including travel time.
Also assumes that data are managed in a relatively efficient manner with limited costs.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 36
3.5 Comparison of Trash Control Measure Implementation Scenarios The estimated costs of implementing the six (6) different trash control measure implementation scenarios described in this section are compared in Table 20. The estimated levels of confidence that each scenario will achieve the overall MRP trash reduction goal of 100% (i.e., no adverse effects) are also summarized in Table 17.
Table 17. Summary table of preliminary planning level cost estimates for trash control measure implementation scenarios designed to achieve the trash reduction goal mandated by the statewide Trash Amendments.
Implementation Scenario
Base/Initial
Tasks
On-going/Annual
Tasks
50 Year
Lifecycle Costs
Confidence in
Achieving Trash
Amendments Goal
(Full Capture or
Equivalent in PLU
Areas)
1 - Trash Full Capture - Large and
Small Systems $5,715,093 $293,816 $20,405,893 High
2 - Trash Full Capture - Small
Systems $1,437,806 $312,383 $17,056,956 High
3 - Large Full Capture Systems &
Multiple Institutional and Source
Controls
$4,868,191 $339,113 $21,823,847 Moderate
4 - Only Institutional and Source
Controls $541,625 $478,454 $24,464,314 Moderate
4. 10-year Trash Control Measure Action Plan
Although the City currently has a robust trash control program, the City will likely need to enhance many of its existing trash control measures, as well as begin implementing new trash control measures to address trash levels in moderate and high trash generating PLU areas to address the mandated Trash Amendments goal of full capture or equivalent in PLU areas by 2030. Four (4) potential trash control measure implementation scenarios were developed, and the associated costs of these scenarios were estimated to help the City identify the resources needed to achieve this goal by 2030. These scenarios each have different base/initial costs and ongoing/annual costs, and different levels of confidence in that the implementation of these actions will achieve the goal of the Trash Amendments.
Due to the high level of confidence in achieving the trash goal, Scenario 1 (Trash Full Capture – Large and Small Systems) and Scenario 2 (Trash Full Capture – Small Systems) are the most high priority implementation scenarios for the City. Based on discussions with City staff, large systems are preferrable to small systems due to the lower costs for operating and maintaining these systems, and therefore Scenario 1 (Trash Full Capture – Large and Small Systems) was selected as the preliminary recommended approach to addressing trash in the City. This approach relies on the implementation of the following trash control measures over the next ten (10) years:
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 37
• Installation and maintenance of large trash full capture systems at four (4) locations; • Installation and maintenance of 368 small trash full capture systems in inlets in the public ROW located outside of the catchments addressed by the large full capture systems; and • Implementation of a trash inspection program to address trash on private properties that enters the City’s MS4 through storm drain inlets located on private properties.
The 10-year implementation phasing of this approach is outlined in Table 18. Based on this implementation phasing, costs estimates and staffing resource needs for each fiscal year leading to fully addressing the Trash Amendments goal by December 2030 is presented in Table 19. The Implementation Strategy (Table 18) and cost/resource estimate (Table 19) provide the City with an preliminary long-term action plan to address the goal of the Trash Amendments. As the action plan is implemented, the strategy and associated cost estimates are likely to change based on new information gathered during the City’s implementation process. Therefore, cost estimates presented in Table 19 should be periodically updated to assist the City with future planning/budgeting.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 38
Table 18. Summary of tasks in 10-year Action Plan for the City of Redding.
Fiscal Year
Control Measure Category
Large Full Capture System Small Full Capture System Trash Inspections on Private Properties FY 22/23 • With consultant support, City continues evaluating the feasibility of installing/constructing large full capture system at the four (4) priority locations.
• Consultant and City conduct additional field visits to further evaluate feasibility at preliminary locations.
• City develops RFP for consultant engineering designs
services to further evaluate locations, design large capture systems, and develop refined cost estimates.
• City selects engineering design consultant and enters into agreement.
• With consultant support, City identifies and selects
catchment(s)/TMA(s) where small full capture systems should be the highest priority and the focus of FY 23/24 and 24/25 installations.
• City reviews existing legal authority to require all private properties to achieve low trash generation (i.e., OVTA ‘A’ score) and/or install full capture system(s) on their properties.
FY 23/24 • Engineering design consultant develops engineering design for large full capture system #1.
• City develops and releases bid package for vendor to install 50 full capture systems in highest priority catchment(s)/TMA(s).
Install systems in highest priority sites.
• Vendor installs 50 devices at highest priority sites. • City develops data management system to house O&M
information.
• With consultant report, City develops and documents the program for conducting OVTAs on private properties.
• With consultant report, City trains restaurant inspectors on conducting OVTAs during inspections (~240 inspections per year).
• With consultant report, City develops data management system for managing OVTA data.
• City develops educational materials for conducting outreach to restaurants and private property owners.
FY 24/25 • City releases bid package for construction contract for construction of large full capture system #1.
• Contractor constructs large full capture system #1.
• City purchases a Vacuum Assisted Truck
• City develops SOP for conducting O&M on small devices. • City conducts maintenance of 50 small systems.
• City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.
FY 25/26 • City develops a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for large full capture system #1.
• City conducts maintenance of large full capture system #1.
• Design engineer consultant develops engineering design for large full capture systems #2 and #3.
• With consultant support, City identifies and selects
catchment(s)/TMA(s) where next round of small full capture systems should be installed.
• Vendor installs an additional 100 devices at high priority sites. • City conducts maintenance of 50 small systems.
• City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 39
Fiscal Year
Control Measure Category
Large Full Capture System Small Full Capture System Trash Inspections on Private Properties • City releases bid package for construction contract for construction of large full capture systems #2 and #3.
FY 26/27 • Contractor constructs large full capture systems #2 and #3.
• City conducts maintenance of large full capture system #1.
• City conducts maintenance of 150 small systems. • City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.
FY 27/28 • Contractor constructs large full capture systems #2 and #3.
• City develops a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for large full capture systems #2 and #3.
• City conducts maintenance of large full capture systems #1, #2, and #3.
• City develops and releases bid package for vendor to install next round of full capture systems in highest priority
catchment(s)/TMA(s).
• Vendor installs an additional 100 devices at high priority sites. • City conducts maintenance of 150 small systems.
• City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.
FY 28/29 • Design engineer consultant develops engineering design for large full capture system #4.
• City releases bid package for construction contract for construction of large full capture system #4.
• City conducts maintenance of large full capture systems #1, #2, and #3.
• City conducts maintenance of 250 small systems. • City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.
FY 29/30 • Contractor constructs large full capture system #4. • City develops a Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) for large full capture systems #4.
• City conducts maintenance of large full capture systems #1, #2, and #3.
• City develops and releases bid package for vendor to install next round of full capture systems in highest priority
catchment(s)/TMA(s).
• Vendor installs an additional 118 devices at high priority sites.
City conducts maintenance of 250 small systems.
• City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.
FY 30/31 • City conducts maintenance of large full capture systems #1, #2, #3, and #4.
• City conducts maintenance of 368 small systems. • City conducts inspections at restaurants and other identified private properties.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 40
Table 19. Estimated City of Redding consultant/capital costs and staffing resource needs for implementing the 10-year Action Plan.
Fiscal Year
Estimated City of Redding Staffing Resource Needs (FTE) Consultant/
Capital Costs City Project Coordinator- Storm Drains City Storm Drain Utility Supervisor City Lead Storm Drain Maintenance Worker City Storm Drain Maintenance Worker - Temporary Vactor Truck Operator City Assistant Director of Public Works City Environmental Compliance Manager City Attorney City Inspector City Storm Water Management Program Coordinator FY 22/23 $50,000 0.45 0.1 0.05 0.08 -- 0.08 0.04 0.02 -- 0.20 FY 23/24 $300,000 0.15 -- 0.30 0.30 -- 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 24/25 $1,650,000 0.15 0.02 0.50 0.50 -- 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 25/26 $500,000 0.15 0.10 0.82 0.90 0.10 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 26/27 $810,000 0.10 0.05 1.07 1.15 0.15 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 27/28 $900,000 0.10 0.05 1.31 1.48 0.19 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 28/29 $200,000 -- -- 1.41 1.58 0.19 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 29/30 $910,000 -- -- 1.51 1.68 0.19 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 FY 30/31 -- -- -- 1.51 1.68 0.19 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.22 0.05 Total Capital $5,320,000
Average FTE/FY 0.12 0.04 0.94 1.04 0.11 0.04 0.02 0.01 0.20 0.07
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 41
5. References
BASMAA (2017). Tracking California’s Trash Project: Evaluation of the On-land Visual Assessment Protocol as a Method to Establish Baseline Levels of Trash and Detect Improvements in Stormwater Quality.
Bay Area Stormwater Management Agencies Association. State Water Resources Control Board Grant Agreement No. 12-420-550. Prepared by EOA, Inc.
http://basmaa.org/Announcements/tracking-cas-trash-on-land-visual-assessments.
EOA, Inc, In prep. Trash Reduction Effectiveness of Curb Inlet Screens. In preparation by EOA. https://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/heatherknight/article/City-has-little-love-for-Bigbelly-bins13309542.php#:~:text=The%20cost%20of%20the%20Bigbelly,maintenance%20for%20all%20of%20t hem.
https://www.facebook.com/ReddingPolice/videos/community-work-program-officernowhiring/2169713883149455/
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 A-1
Appendix A
City of Redding Baseline Trash Generation Maps and Trash Management Areas (TMAs)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 A-2
Overview Map - Baseline trash generating areas of PLUs and TMA boundaries in the of the City of Redding (Revised August 2021).
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 A-3
Downtown Area - Baseline trash generating areas of PLUs and TMA boundaries in the City of Redding (Revised August 2021).
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 A-4
Northern Area - Baseline trash generating areas of PLUs and TMA boundaries in the of the City of Redding (Revised August 2021).
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 A-5
Enterprise Area - Baseline trash generating areas of PLUs and TMA boundaries in the of the City of Redding (Revised August 2021).
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023 A-6
Area along Highway 273 - Baseline trash generating areas of PLUs and TMA boundaries in the of the City of Redding (Revised August 2021).
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) Stormwater Trash Control Measures Evaluation
March 2023
Appendix B
Trash Full Capture System Feasibility Evaluation
Technical Memorandum
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator)
TRASH FULL CAPTURE SYSTEM
FEASIBILITY EVALUATION
Technical Memorandum
FINAL
Prepared for:
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Prepared by:
1410 Jackson Street
Oakland, CA 94602
January 2022
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 2 Purpose of Project
This technical memorandum provides a cost-benefit analysis of installing and maintaining large and small trash full capture systems1 within the City of Redding’s (City) municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) to address trash from Priority Land Use (PLU)2 areas and stormwater trash management goals established in the Statewide Trash Amendment adopted by the State Water Resource Control Board (State Water Board). The results of the analysis are intended to provide the City with estimates of the trash reduction benefits and preliminary planning level cost estimates for the installation and maintenance of these systems.
Background
Regulatory Background
On April 7, 2015, the State Water Board adopted Trash Amendments that amend two statewide water quality control plans to include trash control requirements for owners or operators of MS4s (State Water Board 2015).
3 The Trash Amendments will be implemented through NPDES permits, including the Phase II Small MS4 permit (WQ Order 2013-0001-DWQNPDES NO. CAS000004) for which the City is a permittee.
Under the Trash Amendments, and eventually through the reissued Phase II permit, the City is required to reduce the amount of trash discharged to local water bodies from its MS4 to acceptable levels, beginning no later than 2020 and continuing through the next decade (i.e., 2030).
In November 2018, the City submitted its Stormwater Trash Control Implementation Plan (Implementation Plan) to the State Water Resource Control Board (State Water Board), which notified the agency of the City’s intent to implement a combination of full capture systems, multi-benefit projects, institutional controls, and/or other treatment controls to address the trash reduction goals outlined in the Trash Amendments. In the Implementation Plan, the City identified existing and planned stormwater control measures it will implement to address the trash reduction goals. Trash full capture systems are one type of trash control measure City is currently considering implementing.
Priority Land Use (PLU) Areas and Baseline Trash Levels As defined by the Trash Amendments, PLU areas include all land areas draining to an MS4 that are currently developed as high density residential, industrial, commercial, mixed urban, and public transportation stations. In 2018, the City included preliminary information on PLU areas in its Implementation Plan submitted to the State Water Board based on the limited analyses that had been conducted to date. In 2021, the City conducted an additional evaluation of areas initially as PLUs areas.
The evaluation focused on further determining whether areas originally identified as PLU areas were in fact hydrologically connected to the City’s MS4. The evaluation consisted of conducting a more robust analysis using available information on the configuration of the City’s MS4, drainage features on private parcels, land elevation data, and institutional knowledge of City public works staff. Based on the 1 The State Water Board defines a trash full capture system as a single system (or a series of systems) that traps all particles that are 5 mm or greater and has a design treatment capacity that is either: a) of not less than the peak flow rate, Q, resulting from a one-year, one-hour, storm in the subdrainage area, or b) appropriately sized to, and designed to carry at least the same flows as, the corresponding storm drain (State Water Board 2015).
2 Priority Land Use areas are defined as follows: (1) High-Density Residential: all land uses with at least ten (10) developed dwelling units/acre; (2) Industrial: land uses where the primary activities on the developed parcels involve product manufacture, storage, or distribution (e.g., manufacturing businesses, warehouses, equipment storage lots, junkyards, wholesale businesses, distribution centers, or building material sales yards); (3) Commercial: land uses where the primary activities on the developed parcels involve the sale or transfer of goods or services to consumers (e.g., business or professional buildings, shops, restaurants, theaters, vehicle repair shops, etc.); (4) Mixed Urban: land uses where high-density residential, industrial, and/or commercial land uses predominate collectively (i.e., are intermixed); and (5) Public Transportation Stations: facilities or sites where public transit agencies’ vehicles load or unload passengers or goods (e.g., bus stations and stops). 3 These Amendments are found in Appendix E of the “Water Quality Control Plan for Inland Surface Waters, Enclosed Bays, and Estuaries of California” (ISWEBE Plan) and Appendix D of the “Water Quality Control Plan for Ocean Waters of California” (Ocean Plan).
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 296 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 3 outcomes of the 2021 evaluation, the City’s PLU map was revised and, consistent with the Trash Amendments, all areas confirmed to be hydrologically connected to the City’s MS4 were identified as PLU areas. There are 2,725 acres of land area identified as PLU areas. The remaining land area in the City (36,221 acres) has been identified as non-PLU area and therefore is not subject to the Trash Amendments and no trash reductions are required from these non-PLU areas.
As allowed by the Trash Amendments, the City may have the opportunity to address trash from a nonPLU areas as a substitute for addressing trash in a PLU area as long as the non-PLU area generates an equal or greater level of trash than the PLU area be substituted for (see Implementation Plan for additional information). For the purposes of the analysis presented in this technical memo, however, trash reductions associated with non-PLU areas were not considered given that the baseline trash generation levels for non-PLU areas have yet to be established. The City may choose to account for trash reductions associated with non-PLUs as trash full capture systems are installed.
The stormwater trash management goal established by the Trash Amendments is address trash from PLU areas by either: Track 1) installing and maintaining trash full capture systems in the MS4 that receives drainage from PLU areas; or Track 2) implementing a combination of trash controls that achieve an equivalent level of trash management in PLU areas. As described its Implementation Plan, the City has chosen the Track 2 approach. As such, the City established a baseline trash level for each PLU area based on the results of multiple On-land Visual Trash Assessments (OVTAs) conducted by City staff and consultants. As illustrated on the City’s trash generation map, the levels of trash generation observed via OVTAs is depicted as four categories – low, moderate, high, and very high. The levels of baseline trash generation for PLU areas are provided in Table 1.4To provide a higher level of geographical resolution for trash control measure planning and tracking progress, the City’s PLU areas were divided into 15 Trash Management Areas (TMAs) numbered 1 through 15. Baseline trash generation illustrated in Table 1 are presented by TMA. These TMAs are the geographical areas used to evaluate the costs and benefits of installing and maintaining full capture systems.
As described in the City’s Implementation Plan, the estimated baseline volume of trash generated annually per acre of PLU area is being used as the basis for calculating progress towards the goal of the Trash Amendments. The estimated baseline volume of trash generated from PLU areas in the City is calculated using: 1) the trash generation categories illustrated on the City’s baseline trash generation maps depicting trash generating areas (see Appendix A); and 2) the annual average trash generation rates that were developed in San Francisco Bay Area (BASMAA 2014) and are being used by the City. Based on the results of the Tracking California’s Trash project (BASMAA 2017) that was funded by the State Water Board, the trash generation rates established by BASMAA (2014) correspond well to OVTA scoring categories (A/B/C/D) and the associated trash generation categories (Low/Moderate/High/Very High).
Average annual trash generation rates in gallons per acre established by BASMAA (2017) are as follows:
Low = 0 (i.e., achieved the goal of the Trash Amendments); Moderate = 7.5; High = 30; and Very High = 100. These average trash generation rates were assigned to all PLU areas depicted on City baseline trash generation maps to establish an estimated baseline volume of trash generated annually in City PLU areas.
Using the average rates above and the baseline trash generation levels shown in Table 1, it is estimated that approximately 7,253 gallons of trash are generated from moderate trash generating areas and 22,320 gallons from high trash generating areas in the City, totaling 29,573 gallons of trash generated annually. There are no very high trash generating areas in the City and as described in the previous 4 Following the reevaluation of PLU areas within the City in 2021, a plan was developed to reassess PLU areas for baseline trash generation. The impetus for the reassessment was based on staff observations that OVTA protocols for some areas in the City may not have been explicitly followed during the initial assessments conducted in 2017/2018, which may have resulted in inaccurate trash generation levels illustrated on the City’s baseline trash generation map submitted to the State Water Board with its Track 2 Implementation Plan. The baseline trash generation levels depicted in Table 1 and used in this memorandum are based on the results of the baseline reassessment conducted in 2021.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 4 paragraph, PLU areas that have achieved low trash generation are assumed to have achieved the Trash Amendments goal and therefore generate no trash (for the purpose of measuring trash reduction progress).
Using the average trash generation rates and categories described above, the estimated volume of trash intercepted by full capture systems or prevented/ intercepted by other trash control measures will be used to demonstrate progress towards Trash Amendment. For full capture systems, this is done by quantifying the geographical extent of PLU areas and associated levels of trash generation that have been addressed (i.e., treated) by these devices. Percent trash reductions for full capture systems are calculated by dividing the estimated volume of trash addressed by the devices, by the baseline trash volume developed based on the trash generation maps (i.e., 29,573 gallons). The following equation is used to calculate the percent trash reduction via full capture systems:
Potential Trash Full Capture Systems
A trash full capture system is defined as a single device (or a series of systems) that traps all particles that are 5 mm or greater and has a design treatment capacity that is either: a) of not less than the peak flow rate, Q, resulting from a one-year, one-hour, storm in the subdrainage area, or b) appropriately sized to, and designed to carry at least the same flows as, the corresponding storm drain. In 2017, the State Water Resources Control Board (State Water Board) developed an initial list of certified full trash capture systems that may be installed to comply with the Trash Amendments. This list has been subsequently updated and will continue to be updated based on the certification process outlined by the State Water Board. Descriptions of the general types of certified systems are provided in Appendix B. Certified systems include larger “end-of-pipe” and “in-line” hydrodynamic, netting and screening systems, and smaller screening systems installed in storm drain inlets or catch basins. The number and types of potential large and small systems identified for each TMA are described in the following sections.
X 100
Estimated Volume of Trash (gallons) Intercepted via
Trash Full Capture Systems
Estimated Volume of Trash (gallons) Generated in all PLU areas
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 5 Table 1. City of Redding Priority Land Use (PLU) and Non-PLU areas (acres) in each baseline trash generation category.
Trash
Management
Area
(TMA)
Baseline Trash Generating PLU Areas (acres)
Estimated Baseline Trash Generation
from PLU Areas
Non-PLU Areas
(acres)
Total Area
(PLU and NonLow Moderate High Total PLU) Annual Generation (gallons)
Proportion of
Annual Generation
(%)
1 108 201 131 440 5,438 19.4% 1,223 1,663
2 46 15 19 80 683 2.0% 434 514
3 61 127 265 453 8,903 22.9% 306 759
4 67 149 68 284 3,158 12.7% 145 429
5 69 37 50 156 1,778 5.1% 405 561
6 56 70 63 189 2,415 7.8% 664 853
7 142 226 64 432 3,615 17.0% 1,361 1,793
8 67 98 54 219 2,355 8.9% 1,344 1,563
9 20 9 -- 29 68 0.5% 435 464
10 167 4 24 195 750 1.6% 436 631
11 10 6 -- 16 45 0.4% 198 214
12 1 1 -- 2 8 0.1% 156 158
13 40 4 1 45 60 0.3% 113 158
14 66 7 -- 73 53 0.4% 1,200 1,273
15 94 13 5 112 248 1.1% 27,804 27,916
Totals 1,014 967 744 2,725 29,573 100.0% 36,221 38,946
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 299 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 6 Large Full Capture System Locations
Potential locations for large full capture systems were identified through a combination of desktop analyses and preliminary field visits to potential sites. These efforts identified stormwater catchments (i.e., land areas draining to a discharge point to a surface water body) that are >10 acres in size and have PLU areas within their boundaries, as documented on the City’s baseline trash generation map. The boundaries of each stormwater catchment were delineated using available information on the City’s storm drain network and contour elevations. One or more locations to potentially site a large full capture system within each catchment were then identified based on a combination of Google Street View and GIS data.
The process described above identified 30 potential locations for large full capture systems. These locations are in six (6) of the City’s fifteen (15) TMAs (i.e., TMAs 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 and 7). Detailed maps of each of these potential locations are provided in Appendix C. The land areas draining to these 30 locations form the primary areas of analyses that were used to conduct the cost-benefit evaluation for large full capture systems and compare against a small full capture system approach. These 30 catchments cover 59% of the City’s PLU areas with moderate or high levels of trash generation.
While some TMAs only had one feasible large full capture system location identified, others had multiple locations. Each of the potential large full capture system locations were assigned an identification based on 1) the associated TMA (e.g., 1, 2, 3); 2) the main catchment within that TMA (i.e., A, B or C); and 3) an option number (ascending from upstream to downstream).
The catchments for each of the 30 potential large full capture system locations are shown in Table 2. The number of bus stops in each catchment is also shown. For the purposes of calculating trash reduction benefit, each bus stop is assumed to cover 200 square feet.
Since catchments boundaries for each potential large capture system location are based on stormwater hydrology and the configuration of the City’s storm drain system, not land use, each potential location drains both PLU and non-PLU areas. For small capture systems, it was also assumed that both PLU and non-PLU areas would be addressed. For the purposes of the analysis conducted in this technical memo, however, trash reduction benefits associated with non-PLUs were not considered. Table 2 summarizes the PLU areas that would be addressed should a large full capture system be constructed at the locations identified.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 300 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 7 Table 2. PLU and Non-PLU land area (acres) with low, moderate or high trash generation in seven Trash Management Areas (TMAs) that would be addressed by potential large trash full capture systems in 30 primary stormwater catchments in the City of Redding.
TMA Catchment ID Optiona
PLU Area (acres)
Non-PLU
Area (acres)
# Bus Stops Total Area
(acres)b
Low Mod High Total Total Low Mod High
1 FTC01A -- 4 18 7 28 107 1 3 1 135
FTC01B -- 6 29 37 72 52 0 3 3 124
FTC01C
1 39 68 62 169 382 4 8 3 551
2 33 39 56 128 299 2 5 3 427
3 22 34 56 112 270 1 4 3 382
4 19 20 37 76 248 1 3 3 324
2 FTC02A -- 14 6 14 34 95 1 2 1 129
3 FTC03A
1 34 33 62 128 117 1 7 7 245
2 8 3 0 11 8 0 2 0 19
3 15 4 52 70 90 1 1 6 160
4 6 5 9 20 13 0 2 1 33
FTC03B
1 0 6 31 36 33 0 1 3 69
2 0 6 31 36 33 0 1 3 69
FTC03C -- 19 10 27 57 34 0 2 2 91
FTC03D -- 0 0 8 8 2 0 0 0 10
4 FTC04A
1 3 31 5 39 15 0 3 1 54
2 3 31 5 39 12 0 3 1 51
FTC04B
1 18 25 7 50 93 0 1 1 143
2 17 22 4 43 82 0 1 0 125
FTC04C -- 0 33 9 42 8 0 1 1 50
FTC04D -- 46 24 7 77 20 6 1 0 97
FTC04E -- 66 166 166 398 586 11 10 13 984
6 FTC06A
1 7 18 12 37 223 2 2 3 260
2 4 4 5 13 71 0 1 1 84
3 3 13 7 23 135 2 0 2 158
7 FTC07A -- 2 22 11 34 121 0 3 0 155
FTC07B
1 2 17 8 27 54 1 2 1 81
2 2 10 3 15 49 1 1 0 64
3 0 5 3 8 3 0 1 1 11
FTC07C -- 1 18 5 23 95 0 0 0 118
a Options for each of the catchments may overlap and therefore address the same areas. b
For the purposes of calculating trash reduction benefit, each bus stop is assumed to cover 200 square feet or 0.0046 acres.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 8 Small Full Capture System Locations
Small trash full capture systems (e.g., connector pipe screens or catch basin inserts) are installed in storm drain inlets or catch basins and are alternatives to large trash capture systems. Locations for potential small capture systems were identified using the storm drain system network geodatabase provided by the City. From these GIS maps, all publicly owned catch basins receiving trash from adjacent moderate or high trash generating areas were evaluated. For publicly owned catch basins that are hydraulically connected to each other (i.e., daisy-chained), some upstream catch basins were excluded from the analysis because a downstream small capture system would likely treat the associated upstream area.
Additionally, publicly owned catch basins in low trash generating areas, that appear to not be functional or are abandoned, do not have good access were excluded from the analysis. Privately owned catch basins were also not included as part of the analysis due to limited GIS data on their locations.
Based on the GIS analysis, a total of 655 publicly owned catch basins inlets that address trash from PLU areas were identified as potential locations for small trash full capture systems in the City. The catch basins identified are in all 15 TMAs and include those on California State Highway segments that drain PLU areas. A full list of the catch basins identified for consideration of small full capture systems and their locations are provided in Appendix D. Of these 655 inlets, 428 are located within the stormwater catchments associated with the 30 potential large capture system locations described in the previous section. The costs and benefits of installing and maintaining the small full capture systems within these 30 catchments are compared to the installation and maintenance of large systems. Costs and benefits associated with installing/maintaining small full capture systems in the 227 inlets that drain moderate or high trash generation PLU areas that are located outside of the 30 catchments are also presented. The number of inlets identified for potential small full capture systems in each TMA are listed in Table 3.
Table 3. Storm drain catch basins in the public right-of-way identified in City of Redding Trash Management Areas (TMAs) for potential installation of small trash full capture systems.
Trash
Management
Area (TMA)
# of Catch Basins for Small Full Capture Systems
Within the 30 Catchments for
Large Systems
Outside of the 30 Catchments
for Large Systems
Total
1 199 40 239
2 5 7 12
3 122 12 134
4 56 0 56
5 0 14 14
6 10 27 37
7 31 66 97
8 0 38 38
9 1 1 2
10 0 5 5
11 0 5 5
12 0 1 1
13 0 3 3
14 0 2 2
15 4 6 10
Total 428 227 655
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 9 Estimated Costs and Benefits of Full Capture Systems
Preliminary planning level cost estimates and the estimated trash load reduction benefits5 associated with installing and maintaining trash full capture systems were calculated for large and small system scenarios.
The estimated costs and benefits of large systems were developed for each of the 30 potential locations identified. For small systems, costs and benefits were developed for both those inlets located within and outside of the 30 catchments delineated for large systems. 6 The cost estimates presented in this section were developed using methods and assumptions described in Appendix E and should be considered preliminary planning-level estimates that may not include all costs associated with the design, planning, purchasing, constructing/installing, and operating and maintaining the potential full capture system. Costs estimates presented are based on the most readily available information at the time this evaluation was conducted. Cost estimating for large systems is dependent upon the size of the system needed to address the full capture storm event (i.e., 1-yr, 1-hr).
The methods used to size large full capture systems are described in Appendix F.
Comparisons of capital (base) and on-going operation and maintenance (O&M) costs between small and large full capture systems are included in this section for the 30 catchments. These comparisons are provided to assist the City with identifying the most cost-effective full capture system approach to achieving the goal of the Trash Amendments. For areas outside of the 30 catchments, the estimated costs and benefits of installing and maintaining small full capture systems are also provided. Should the City decide to move forward with installing full capture systems (large or small) at the sites identified, more detailed designed and associated cost estimates will be needed before moving forward with construction/installation.
Large Full Capture Systems
Estimated base, annual ongoing, and lifecycle (50-year) costs of installing and maintaining large full capture systems at the 30 potential locations identified by the City are included in Table 4. Cost estimates were developed based on methods and assumptions described in Appendix E. Estimated trash reductions for each individual large full capture location are also included in Table 4.
Based on a field reconnaissance conducted in February 2020, a Baffle Box system would likely be the most optimal type of large full capture system for nine (9) of the thirty (30) potential locations for large full capture systems. Costs estimates in Table 4 were developed based on the assumption that Baffle Box type systems would be installed and maintained at these 9 sites. The costs for the installation of Baffle Boxes at these sites were derived primarily from a regression curve relating treatment flow to base costs, as described in Appendix E. During the February 2020 field reconnaissance, EOA determined that inchannel netting systems would be the most optimal type of large full capture system for the remaining twenty-one (21) locations. The base and maintenance costs presented for these locations assume that netting systems would be installed and maintained at these sites. Please note that the costs associated with in-channel netting systems are not readily available due to their limited application to-date, and therefore the costs are likely dependent upon the vendor and the type of netting system installed. Costs assumptions for end-of-pipe netting systems were used in place of assumptions for in-channel systems but may not fully include all anticipated costs such as the construction of concrete headwalls that would likely be required to withstand the force of storm flows on the in-channel nets. 5 Please note that the Implementation Plan provides an in-depth explanation of how trash loads (gallons/acre) are calculated from trash levels (acres). Trash reduction benefits are calculated based on the percentage of baseline trash loads addressed by the full capture system(s). 6 The estimated costs and benefits of large and small systems are compared to those associated with other trash control measures in the Final Cost Benefit Evaluation Report, which includes a cost-benefit evaluation that identifies and recommends the most cost-effective trash control measure strategy for the City.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 10 Table 4. Preliminary planning level cost estimates for addressing trash from moderate and high trash generating areas within the City of Redding via large trash full capture systems in the 30 primary catchments.
Catchment ID
Drainage Area
(acres)
% Trash
Reduction via
Treatment of
PLU areas
Probable Type of Large
Full Capture System
Base Costs
(System, Installation, and
Contingency)
On-going Costs
(Operation/Maintenance) Total
Lifecycle Costs
(50-years)
Total Lifecycle Costs
per % Trash
Reduction via
Treatment of PLU
areas
Total
(50 years)
Annual
(over 50 years)
FTC01A 135 1.1% In-line Netting $300,000 $600,000 $12,000 $900,000 $810,000 FTC01B 124 4.5% Baffle Box $1,290,000 $75,000 $1,500 $1,400,000 $310,000 FTC01C-1 552 8.1% Baffle Box $1,860,000 $75,000 $1,500 $1,900,000 $240,000 FTC01C-2 427 6.7% In-line Netting $525,000 $1,600,000 $31,000 $2,100,000 $320,000 FTC01C-3 382 6.5% Baffle Box $1,630,000 $75,000 $1,500 $1,700,000 $260,000 FTC01C-4 324 4.2% In-line Netting $500,000 $900,000 $18,000 $1,400,000 $330,000 FTC02A 130 1.6% In-line Netting $180,000 $600,000 $12,000 $780,000 $490,000 FTC03A-1 245 7.1% In-line Netting $400,000 $1,300,000 $25,000 $1,700,000 $240,000 FTC03A-2 19 0.1% In-line Netting $30,000 $310,000 $6,100 $340,000 $3,900,000 FTC03A-3 160 5.4% In-line Netting $250,000 $900,000 $18,000 $1,200,000 $220,000 FTC03A-4 34 1.1% In-line Netting $50,000 $310,000 $6,100 $360,000 $340,000 FTC03B-1 69 3.2% In-line Netting $300,000 $600,000 $12,000 $900,000 $280,000 FTC03B-2 69 3.2% Baffle Box $988,000 $75,000 $1,500 $1,100,000 $340,000 FTC03C 91 3.0% In-line Netting $300,000 $600,000 $12,000 $900,000 $300,000 FTC03D 10 0.8% In-line Netting $30,000 $310,000 $6,100 $340,000 $430,000 FTC04A-1 54 1.3% In-line Netting $200,000 $600,000 $12,000 $800,000 $620,000 FTC04A-2 50 1.3% In-line Netting $200,000 $600,000 $12,000 $800,000 $620,000 FTC04B-1 142 1.4% Baffle Box $1,090,000 $75,000 $1,500 $1,200,000 $870,000 FTC04B-2 124 0.9% In-line Netting $200,000 $600,000 $12,000 $800,000 $850,000 FTC04C 51 1.8% Baffle Box $799,000 $75,000 $1,500 $870,000 $490,000 FTC04D 96 1.3% In-line Netting $150,000 $900,000 $18,000 $1,100,000 $820,000 FTC04E 984 21.0% In-line Netting $1,000,000 $2,800,000 $55,000 $3,800,000 $180,000 FTC06A-1 260 1.7% In-line Netting $400,000 $900,000 $18,000 $1,300,000 $770,000 FTC06A-2 83 0.6% In-line Netting $180,000 $600,000 $12,000 $780,000 $1,300,000 FTC06A-3 159 1.1% In-line Netting $200,000 $600,000 $12,000 $800,000 $760,000 FTC07A 155 1.6% Baffle Box $970,000 $75,000 $1,500 $1,000,000 $610,000 FTC07B-1 81 1.2% Baffle Box $896,000 $75,000 $1,500 $970,000 $800,000 FTC07B-2 64 0.6% In-line Netting $200,000 $310,000 $6,100 $510,000 $920,000 FTC07B-3 11 0.5% In-line Netting $200,000 $310,000 $6,100 $510,000 $1,100,000 FTC07C 118 0.9% Baffle Box $831,000 $75,000 $1,500 $910,000 $990,000
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 11 Small Full Capture Systems
The estimated costs and benefits of installing and maintaining small full capture systems are presented in Table 5 for the 428 catch basins located within the 30 catchments and in Table 6 for the 227 catch basins located outside of the 30 primary catchments. Cost estimates for small full capture systems were developed based on methods and assumptions described in Appendix E It is important to note that the trash reduction benefits of installing small full capture systems is challenging to estimate, given the limited information regarding the configuration of the City’s storm drain system and its connectivity to PLU and non-PLU areas. The following should be considered when evaluating the trash reduction benefits of small full capture systems presented in this report:
• Because some land areas drain to storm drain inlets located on private properties, these areas likely would not be treated by small full capture systems place in inlets in the public ROW.
Therefore, the trash reduction percentages under a small system installation scenario are inherently lower than those associated with a large system scenario that addresses the same area/catchment. This is one of the challenges of installing small systems within the public ROW. • Estimated trash reductions for small systems are based on a desktop analysis that used GIS and did not include field investigations. Because inflow pipes and flow patterns cannot be determined without field investigations, the reductions based on desktop GIS methods may be over or underestimated.
• Some inlets likely have physical characteristics that preclude the installation of a small system.
Areas draining to these inlets would therefore not be addressed by a small trash capture system, although included in the load reductions estimated here in this memorandum. Additionally, inlets that do not have a vault or are atypical in size or construction (e.g., pipe inlets, raised area drains, or teepees) cannot generally host a certified small full capture system and therefore have been excluded from the analysis.
• The area treated by a small catch basin system is somewhat dependent upon the type of system installed. Some systems only treat surface runoff and do not address flows from connecting pipes (e.g., baskets). For these systems, the area treated would be significantly reduced, compared to the estimated areas used in this memorandum to estimate trash load reductions. These types of systems are summarized in Appendix B.
Due to the uncertainties in calculating the area addressed by small capture systems, the trash reduction estimates provided in Tables 5 and 6 (and 7) should be considered preliminary. Should the City choose to install small systems, it is recommended that the treatment area for each system (or groups of systems) should be identified via field investigations and revised in GIS using the results. The associated trash reductions should be recalculated and revised accordingly prior to reporting reductions to the Regional or State Water Board.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 12 Table 5. Preliminary planning level cost estimates for addressing trash from moderate and high trash generating areas within the City of Redding via small full capture systems in the 30 primary catchments.
Catchment ID # of Systems
% Trash Reduction
via Treatment of
PLU areas
Base Costs
(System and Installation)
Ongoing Costs
(Replacement & Operation/Maintenance)
Total Lifecycle Costs
(50-years)
Total Lifecycle Costs
per % Trash Reduction
via Treatment of PLU
areas
System Replacement
(2x over 50 years)
Annual
(over 50 years)
Total
(50 years)
FTC01A 14 1.0% $14,000 $28,000 $4,400 $250,000 $260,000 $250,000 FTC01B 59 4.5% $59,000 $118,000 $19,000 $1,100,000 $1,200,000 $270,000 FTC01C-1 126 8.1% $126,000 $252,000 $40,000 $2,300,000 $2,400,000 $300,000 FTC01C-2 99 6.7% $99,000 $198,000 $31,000 $1,700,000 $1,800,000 $270,000 FTC01C-3 94 6.5% $94,000 $188,000 $30,000 $1,700,000 $1,800,000 $280,000 FTC01C-4 45 4.2% $45,000 $90,000 $14,000 $790,000 $840,000 $200,000 FTC02A 5 0.6% $5,000 $10,000 $1,600 $90,000 $95,000 $150,000 FTC03A-1 28 3.4% $28,000 $56,000 $8,800 $500,000 $530,000 $160,000 FTC03A-2 3 0.1% $3,000 $6,000 $950 $54,000 $57,000 $650,000 FTC03A-3 16 2.5% $16,000 $32,000 $5,100 $290,000 $310,000 $130,000 FTC03A-4 8 0.9% $8,000 $16,000 $2,500 $140,000 $150,000 $160,000 FTC03B-1 15 2.2% $15,000 $30,000 $4,700 $270,000 $290,000 $130,000 FTC03B-2 15 2.2% $15,000 $30,000 $4,700 $270,000 $290,000 $130,000 FTC03C 15 1.9% $15,000 $30,000 $4,700 $270,000 $290,000 $150,000 FTC03D 4 0.6% $4,000 $8,000 $1,300 $73,000 $77,000 $120,000 FTC04A-1 12 0.7% $12,000 $24,000 $3,800 $210,000 $220,000 $320,000 FTC04A-2 12 0.7% $12,000 $24,000 $3,800 $210,000 $220,000 $320,000 FTC04B-1 8 0.5% $8,000 $16,000 $2,500 $140,000 $150,000 $270,000 FTC04B-2 6 0.3% $6,000 $12,000 $1,900 $110,000 $120,000 $350,000 FTC04C 8 0.5% $8,000 $16,000 $2,500 $140,000 $150,000 $280,000 FTC04D 11 0.8% $11,000 $22,000 $3,500 $200,000 $210,000 $280,000 FTC04E 106 10.7% $106,000 $212,000 $33,000 $1,900,000 $2,000,000 $190,000 FTC06A-1 9 0.8% $9,000 $18,000 $2,800 $160,000 $170,000 $210,000 FTC06A-2 2 0.2% $2,000 $4,000 $630 $36,000 $38,000 $180,000 FTC06A-3 7 0.6% $7,000 $14,000 $2,200 $120,000 $130,000 $220,000 FTC07A 19 1.5% $19,000 $38,000 $6,000 $340,000 $360,000 $230,000 FTC07B-1 11 0.9% $11,000 $22,000 $3,500 $200,000 $210,000 $240,000 FTC07B-2 4 0.3% $4,000 $8,000 $1,300 $73,000 $77,000 $290,000 FTC07B-3 5 0.5% $5,000 $10,000 $1,600 $90,000 $95,000 $210,000 FTC07C 1 0.1% $1,000 $2,000 $320 $18,000 $19,000 $290,000
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 13 Table 6. Preliminary planning level cost estimates for addressing trash from moderate and high trash generating areas within the City of Redding via small full capture systems in areas outside of the 30 catchments for potential large capture systems.
Catchment ID # of Systems
% Trash Reduction
via Treatment of PLU
areas
Base Costs
(System and Installation)
Ongoing Costs
(Replacement & Operation/Maintenance)
Total Lifecycle Costs
(50-years)
Total Lifecycle Costs
per % Trash Reduction
via Treatment of PLU
areas
System Replacement
(2x over 50 years)
Annual
(over 50 years)
Total
(50 years)
TMA 1 40 3.6% $40,000 $80,000 $13,000 $730,000 $770,000 $220,000 TMA 2 7 0.8% $7,000 $14,000 $2,200 $120,000 $130,000 $170,000 TMA 3 12 1.5% $12,000 $24,000 $3,800 $210,000 $220,000 $150,000 TMA 4 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
TMA 5 14 1.6% $14,000 $28,000 $4,400 $250,000 $260,000 $170,000 TMA 6 27 2.7% $27,000 $54,000 $8,500 $480,000 $510,000 $190,000 TMA 7 66 4.5% $66,000 $132,000 $21,000 $1,200,000 $1,300,000 $290,000 TMA 8 38 3.2% $38,000 $76,000 $12,000 $680,000 $720,000 $230,000 TMA 9 1 0.0% $1,000 $2,000 $320 $18,000 $19,000 $470,000 TMA 10 5 0.7% $5,000 $10,000 $1,600 $90,000 $95,000 $130,000 TMA 11 5 0.2% $5,000 $10,000 $1,600 $90,000 $95,000 $470,000 TMA 12 1 0.0% $1,000 $2,000 $320 $18,000 $19,000 $470,000 TMA 13 3 0.2% $3,000 $6,000 $950 $54,000 $57,000 $290,000 TMA 14 2 0.1% $2,000 $4,000 $630 $36,000 $38,000 $470,000 TMA 15 6 0.5% $6,000 $12,000 $1,900 $110,000 $120,000 $270,000 Totals 227 19.4% $227,000 $454,000 $72,220 $4,086,000 $4,353,000 $224,381
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 14 Comparison of the Costs & Benefits of Large and Small Full Capture Systems The costs and benefits of installing and maintaining large and small full capture systems to address trash generated in PLU areas were compared. Comparisons were made based on the total estimated accumulated (50-year lifecycle) costs associated with the installation and maintenance of each type of system(s). The results of the comparison are provided in Table 7. The most cost-effective implementation scenario for each catchment is identified as the scenario that has the lowest lifecycle costs per each percent trash reduction.
Based on the comparison, the most cost-effective full capture scenario for 3 out of the 30 catchments is a large full capture system. Small full capture systems have lower estimated life-cycle costs for the remaining 27 catchments. Small full capture systems are the only feasible option identified to address trash from PLU areas outside of the 30 catchments.
These results suggest that that if the City were to primarily take a full capture approach to addressing the goal of the Trash Amendments, then installing a combination of small and large full capture systems in the 30 catchments of interest would be the most cost-effective approach. The proposed optimal costeffective full capture approach outlined in Table 7 for large (n=3) and small devices (n=112) within the 30 catchments could achieve a maximum of 56% trash reduction, and the installation of small devices outside of the 30 catchments (n=227) would achieve an additional trash reduction of 19%. Together, the installation of large and small systems in the City’s MS4 would achieve an estimated 75% trash reduction.
Based on the current understanding of the configuration of the City’s MS4 and its connectivity to PLU areas, it is estimated that the remaining trash reduction needed to achieve the goal of the Trash Amendments (i.e., approximately 25%) would need to be achieved via the implementation of trash controls other than the installation of trash full capture systems owned and operated by the City. Many PLU areas are assumed to have private drainage systems that connect to the City’s MS4 storm drain lines (i.e., not the City-owned inlets in the public right-of-way) and therefore small full capture systems installed in inlets in the public right-of-way would not address trash from these PLU areas. Additionally, other locations for large full capture systems do not appear to be feasible to address trash from these areas draining to inlets on private properties. As discussed in the City’s broader Trash Control Measure Evaluation (January 2022), the City will need to consider implementing other types of trash control measures to ensure that trash from these areas is addressed and the overall Trash Amendments goal is achieved.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) 15 Table 6. Comparison of estimated costs and benefits for Large and Small Trash Full Capture Systems within the 30 primary catchments.
Catchment
ID
Large Full Capture Systems Small Full Capture Systems
Most Cost-effective
Full Capture
Scenario
Lifecycle Cost
(50 years)
% Trash Reduction
from PLU areas
Total Lifecycle Costs per %
Trash Reduction via
Treatment of PLU areas
Lifecycle Costs
(50 years)
# Devices
% Trash
Reductiona
Total Lifecycle Costs per
% Trash Reduction via
Treatment of PLU areas
FTC01A $900,000 1.1% $810,000 $260,000 14 1.0% $250,000 Small FTC01B $1,400,000 4.5% $310,000 $1,200,000 59 4.5% $270,000 Small FTC01C-1 $1,900,000 8.1% $240,000 $2,400,000 126 8.1% $300,000 Large FTC01C-2 $2,100,000 6.7% $320,000 $1,800,000 99 6.7% $270,000 Small FTC01C-3 $1,700,000 6.5% $260,000 $1,800,000 94 6.5% $280,000 Large FTC01C-4 $1,400,000 4.2% $330,000 $840,000 45 4.2% $200,000 Small FTC02A $780,000 1.6% $490,000 $95,000 5 0.6% $150,000 Small FTC03A-1 $1,700,000 7.1% $240,000 $530,000 28 3.4% $160,000 Small FTC03A-2 $340,000 0.1% $3,900,000 $57,000 3 0.1% $650,000 Small FTC03A-3 $1,200,000 5.4% $220,000 $310,000 16 2.5% $130,000 Small FTC03A-4 $360,000 1.1% $340,000 $150,000 8 0.9% $160,000 Small FTC03B-1 $900,000 3.2% $280,000 $290,000 15 2.2% $130,000 Small FTC03B-2 $1,100,000 3.2% $340,000 $290,000 15 2.2% $130,000 Small FTC03C $900,000 3.0% $300,000 $290,000 15 1.9% $150,000 Small FTC03D $340,000 0.8% $430,000 $77,000 4 0.6% $120,000 Small FTC04A-1 $800,000 1.3% $620,000 $220,000 12 0.7% $320,000 Small FTC04A-2 $800,000 1.3% $620,000 $220,000 12 0.7% $320,000 Small FTC04B-1 $1,200,000 1.4% $870,000 $150,000 8 0.5% $270,000 Small FTC04B-2 $800,000 0.9% $850,000 $120,000 6 0.3% $350,000 Small FTC04C $870,000 1.8% $490,000 $150,000 8 0.5% $280,000 Small FTC04D $1,100,000 1.3% $820,000 $210,000 11 0.8% $280,000 Small FTC04E $3,800,000 21.0% $180,000 $2,000,000 106 10.7% $190,000 Large FTC06A-1 $1,300,000 1.7% $770,000 $170,000 9 0.8% $210,000 Small FTC06A-2 $780,000 0.6% $1,300,000 $38,000 2 0.2% $180,000 Small FTC06A-3 $800,000 1.1% $760,000 $130,000 7 0.6% $220,000 Small FTC07A $1,000,000 1.6% $610,000 $360,000 19 1.5% $230,000 Small FTC07B-1 $970,000 1.2% $800,000 $210,000 11 0.9% $240,000 Small FTC07B-2 $510,000 0.6% $920,000 $77,000 4 0.3% $290,000 Small FTC07B-3 $510,000 0.5% $1,100,000 $95,000 5 0.5% $210,000 Small FTC07C $910,000 0.9% $990,000 $19,000 1 0.1% $290,000 Small Outside of 30 Primary Catchments NA NA NA $4,353,000 227 19.4% $224,381 Small a % reductions estimated for small full capture may be less than the % reductions for large full capture because of trash generating areas draining to catch basins on private land areas that would not be addressed via small devices located in the public ROW.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) A-1
Appendix A
Baseline Generation Maps for PLU Parcels in Redding
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) A-2
City of Redding Baseline Trash Generation Map (Revised in August 2021)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) B-1
Appendix B
Descriptions of Trash Full Capture Systems
The State Water Board defines a trash full capture system as follows:
A single system (or a series of systems) that traps all particles that are 5 mm or greater and has a design treatment capacity that is either: a) of not less than the peak flow rate, Q, resulting from a one-year, one-hour, storm in the subdrainage area, or b) appropriately sized to, and designed to carry at least the same flows as, the corresponding storm drain.” (State Water Board 2015) In 2017, the State Water Board developed a list of certified full trash capture systems which may be installed to comply with the Trash Amendments.7 Full trash capture systems must trap all particles retained by a 5-millimeter mesh screen and have a design treatment capacity of not less than the peak flow rate resulting from a one-year, one-hour storm event. Systems certified by the State Water Board include larger “end-of-pipe” and “in-line” netting and screening systems, and smaller screening systems installed in storm drain vaults or catch basins. Descriptions of both large and small full capture systems are included in this section.
Large Full Capture Systems
Large systems can treat an entire stormwater catchment area, including storm drains on private property, and provide a single location for maintenance, saving operation and maintenance resources over time.
Two disadvantages of large systems are the relatively high capital and construction costs, which require a large initial funding source, and the higher instance of subsurface utility conflicts at desired locations within highly urbanized areas.
There are three types of large full capture systems currently certified by the State Water Boardhydrodynamic separators, gross solids removal devices, and netting systems. Each of these types of large systems have been installed in the Bay Area. Examples of these types of systems are provided in this section. The selection of large systems for reducing trash will depend on the characteristics of a specific location, hydraulic impacts, potential for environmental permitting, and resulting trash load reduction percentage.
Hydrodynamic Separators – Vortex Separator
The most common large system installed within the Bay Area is a hydrodynamic separator (HDS), also known as a vortex separator or swirl concentrator (Figure A1). These systems are produced by several manufacturers, each with their own design, but all contain large cylindrical separation chambers in which stormwater enters, creating a vortex to separate trash, debris, oil, and other pollutants from stormwater.
The velocity is highest at the outer edge of the vortex, keeping trash and debris from clogging outflow holes and allowing the stormwater to leave the cylinder. Heavier material settles to the bottom of the storage sump, and floatables remain on the surface of the water within the separator cylinder.
Trash, debris, and sediment is usually removed from the HDS with a vacuum truck, however, alternative systems may be fitted with a large basket to collect settled material, which is subsequently removed via a boom truck and emptied into a container for disposal. HDS units have the advantage of having a relatively small footprint and offer additional flexibility in their installation locations when compared to other types 7 Future approvals of new trash full capture systems will be administered by the State Water Board through implementation of the statewide Trash Amendments. https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/docs/trash_implementation/a1_certified_fcd.pdf
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) B-2
of large systems. HDS units come in a large variety of types and sizes, and may be scaled up to handle peak flows of several hundred cubic feet per second. They can also be small enough to be retrofitted into existing manholes. Studies have shown that HDS units can be highly effective at trapping trash.
Although there are many advantages to HDS units for trash control, they also have their disadvantages.
Compared to other types of large systems, HDS units can have high capital costs. Additionally, for large drainage areas (e.g., >300 acres), the sump depths for HDS units may need to be greater than 25 feet, which poses a maintenance challenge given that typical atmospheric pressure limits vertical suction lift of pumps (i.e., vacuum trucks). Additional booster pumps are therefore needed to clean HDS sumps at these depths.
Figure A1. (Left) Diagram of a Contech CDS® hydrodynamic separator (Source:
www.conteches.com/products/stormwater-management/treatment). (Right) Separator Cylinder of Contech CDS® hydrodynamic separator (Courtesy of City of San Jose).
Hydrodynamic Separators – Nutrient/Debris Separating Baffle Boxes Nutrient Separating Baffle Boxes (NSBB) and Debris Separating Baffle Boxes (DSBB) are both a type of hydrodynamic separator designed with a shallower depth than a vortex separator (Figure A2). Treatment flow rates vary by size and configuration of the unit. Stormwater enters a rectangular chamber with a screening system suspended above sedimentation chambers to separate trash, debris, oil, and other pollutants from stormwater.
The NSBB/DSBB screening system stores trash and debris in a dry state which minimizes nutrient leaching, bacterial growth, and odors. All collected material within the screening system and sump is removed with a vacuum truck. NSBB/DSBB units are shallower than vortex separators, reducing the need for shoring during construction. NSBB and DSBB unit configurations are available for in-line or off-line installation. At least two NSBB/DSBB units are currently installed in the Bay Area, with several more planned.
The disadvantages to NSBB/DSBB units for trash control include the need for a larger footprint for siting the system and the limited information on maintenance and operation. Because the design of the NSBB/DSBB requires a larger horizontal footprint than vortex separators, utility and ROW conflicts may pose a challenge to installation and maintenance. Additionally, since these systems are relatively new types of trash controls, maintenance experience and considerations are generally not well established.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) B-3
Figure A2. Bio Clean Debris Separating Baffle Box (Source: https://biocleanenvironmental.com/debrisseparating-baffle-box/).
Gross Solids Removal Systems (GSRD)
Gross solids removal devices (GSRD) have also been installed in the Bay Area (Figure A3). A GSRD may be installed as a series of screens in-line, within a channel, at the end of a pipe, or within the forebay of a stormwater pump station. As stormwater enters the GSRD, trash and debris are captured inside the screens and water exits through 5 mm wide gaps (i.e., screen louvers). GSRDs may be installed in a linearradial configuration to treat flows from pipes that are 12 to 72 inches in diameter to the desired capacity or within the forebay of a stormwater pump station as a flat-panel configuration. A GSRD may require a large horizontal footprint compared to the other systems but may be the best option if space is not a consideration.
The linear-radial configuration is maintained by opening the length of the system and vacuuming trash and debris stored within the system. The flat-panel configuration is maintained by removing trash and debris adhering to the panels. Figure B4 shows the GSRD installed at the Wrigley-Ford pump station in the City of Milpitas. The Milpitas system is a linear-radial and flat-panel configuration. Additional information on GSRDs may be found on the Roscoe Moss Company website, the manufacturer of the systems (https://roscoemoss.com/products/stormwater-gross-solids-removal-device/).
Disadvantages to the GSRD include siting and maintenance challenges. Siting can be difficult in certain situations due to the extent of the footprint needed to construct and maintain the device. Additionally, maintenance challenges with extruding the material captured by the GSRD are common with these types of devices.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) B-4
Figure A3. Cut away view of Linear Radial Configuration #1 (LR-1) screen (courtesy of the American Society of Civil Engineers Publications).
Figure A4. Gross solids removal device (GSRD) in linear-radial configuration (Left) and installed in the City of Milpitas (Right).
Netting Systems
Netting systems rely on the force of flowing water to trap floatables in disposable nylon mesh bags of varying mesh sizes and storage volumes. The typical configuration is a large net installed end-of-pipe, however, the manufacturers indicate that these nets can also be placed in-line. Netting systems may be designed and installed to treat any size of catchment but are most commonly used to treat relatively large catchments. Two types of netting systems are available. The first is the NetTech manufactured by Oldcastle Stormwater Solutions (formerly KriStar Enterprises, Inc.) and requires very little infrastructure to install. It can be installed with a relatively small initial cost relative to the other types of systems. This system is placed over the entire outfall and is attached to the outfall with a tether (Figure A5). It is designed to detach with a certain amount of force, usually when the net is full. Once full, the net closes and detaches, and the tether prevents the net from moving down stream. The net requires a minimum
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) B-5
footprint of ten feet between the outfall and the receiving water body and must be placed on a concrete pad.
Figure A5. Oldcastle Stormwater Solutions NetTech Gross Pollutant Trap within City of Vallejo (Source:
https://oldcastleprecast.com).
The second type of netting system is the TrashTrap manufactured by StormTrap Technologies Inc. (formerly Fresh Creek Technologies Inc.). It requires a structure to house the netting system (Figure A6).
The nets are designed not to detach automatically. An overflow screen is located above the nets so that any excess flows can easily bypass. Once full, nets are removed with a boom truck and disposed. New nets may be installed to eliminate the cleaning of existing nets. This netting system can be easily scaled up, has negligible headloss (does not increase upstream flooding) when cleaned regularly, and may be installed under water or within tidal areas, allowing it to be installed in more types of locations than the other systems. This flexibility is particularly important in San Mateo of San Mateo where many of the outfalls have significant tidal influence or partially submerged.
Figure A6. StormTrap Technologies End-of-Pipe Netting TrashTrap® (Courtesy of StormTrap Technologies, Inc.).
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) B-6
Small Full Capture Systems
Screening systems that are installed in stormwater catch basins (or catch basins) are commonly known as catch basin inserts (CBIs). CBIs are placed inside a catch basin to prevent trash, organic material (e.g. leaves and twigs) and sediment from entering the storm drain outflow pipe within the catch basin. There are two general designs of CBIs, catch basin inserts and outlet inserts. Catch basin inserts are placed inside the catch basin, while outlet inserts are placed in front of the outlet pipe. A wide variety of CBI designs exist, mostly in the form of outlet inserts (e.g., connector pipe screens) that are placed in front of the outlet pipe. Figure A7 shows examples of connector pipe screens (CPSs) installed in the Bay Area.
Figure A8 illustrates a catch basin insert manufactured by Revel Environmental Manufacturing, Inc. CBIs that use filtering walls or filter media are not applicable for trapping trash and do not meet the full trash capture standard. As a result, the term “insert” does not refer to configurations that use filter media for removing other stormwater pollutants.
Maintenance is performed with a vacuum truck or manually with a shovel. At a minimum, maintenance is performed at least once per year to ensure that the system meets the full capture standard. If the system is observed to have a plugged or blinded screen or is greater than 50 percent full during a maintenance event, the maintenance frequency should be increased so that the system is neither plugged nor more than half full at the next maintenance event.
Figure A7. Small Connector Pipe Screens installed in catch basins within the Bay Area.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) B-7
Figure A8. Catch basin insert manufactured by Revel Environmental Manufacturing, Inc.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C-1
Appendix C
Maps Illustrating Potential Large Full Capture System Locations
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-2
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-3
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-4
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-5
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-6
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-7
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-8
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 326 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-9
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 327 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-10
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 328 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-11
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 329 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-12
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 330 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-13
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-14
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-15
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 333 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-16
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-17
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-18
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-19
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-20
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-21
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-22
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-23
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-24
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-25
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-26
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-27
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) C
-28
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D-1
Appendix D
Locations of Storm Drain Inlets for Potential
Small Trash Full Capture Systems
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-2
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-3
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-4
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-5
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-6
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-7
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-8
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-9
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-10
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-11
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-1
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-2
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-3
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-4
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-5
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-6
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
1 17788 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5799-122.386
2 17807 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5794-122.386
3 17815 AREADRAIN CITY1 NA 40.5821-122.387
4 17820 AREADRAIN CITY1 NA 40.5819-122.387
5 17821 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5821-122.387
6 17822 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5816-122.387
7 17784 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5856-122.382
8 17813 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5831-122.388
9 17816 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5829-122.387
10 18768 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5847-122.385
11 18769 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5845-122.385
12 17847 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5855-122.382
13 15117 AREADRAIN CITY1 NA 40.5898-122.378
14 15118 AREADRAIN CITY1 NA 40.5896-122.378
15 15119 AREADRAIN CITY1 NA 40.5894-122.378
16 15120 AREADRAIN CITY1 NA 40.5888-122.378
17 15121 AREADRAIN CITY1 NA 40.5888-122.379
18 15124 AREADRAIN CITY1 NA 40.5886-122.38
19 15125 AREADRAIN CITY1 NA 40.5887-122.38
20 17879 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5886-122.38
21 17880 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5883-122.379
22 17882 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5875-122.38
23 17883 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5885-122.379
24 17886 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5888-122.38
25 16590 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5752-122.372
26 17901 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5784-122.376
27 17909 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5844-122.375
28 17828 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5815-122.384
29 17829 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5812-122.384
30 17922 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5769-122.373
31 17929 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5771-122.371
32 17935 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5892-122.378
33 18700 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5891-122.378
34 18485 AREADRAIN CALTRANS1 NA 40.5872-122.379
35 21021 AREADRAIN CITY1 NA 40.5746-122.375
36 18772 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5837-122.385
37 18697 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5899-122.377
38 17904 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.575-122.376
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-7
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
39 23619 AREADRAIN CITY1 NA 40.5751-122.376
40 18487 CATCHBASIN CITY1 NA 40.5879-122.381
41 17293 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5879-122.399
42 17295 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.587-122.4
43 17286 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5872-122.4
44 18428 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5868-122.4
45 17269 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5859-122.405
46 17270 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5859-122.405
47 17290 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5863-122.401
48 16233 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5885-122.396
49 15132 AREADRAIN CALTRANS1 FTC01B 40.5877-122.392
50 16482 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5877-122.386
51 15514 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5889-122.388
52 15546 AREADRAIN CALTRANS1 FTC01B 40.5866-122.391
53 15566 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5883-122.395
54 15568 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5881-122.395
55 15608 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5868-122.397
56 17420 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.587-122.397
57 18776 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5864-122.386
58 20178 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5887-122.388
59 15085 AREADRAIN CALTRANS1 FTC01B 40.5856-122.391
60 15086 AREADRAIN CALTRANS1 FTC01B 40.5854-122.391
61 15088 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5851-122.39
62 15092 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5841-122.389
63 15140 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5896-122.395
64 17859 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5897-122.388
65 17862 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01B 40.5872-122.388
66 17863 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5871-122.388
67 17864 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5871-122.388
68 17436 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5896-122.391
69 17442 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5895-122.39
70 17443 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5896-122.389
71 17444 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5893-122.39
72 17445 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5891-122.39
73 16828 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5899-122.388
74 17401 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5848-122.389
75 17402 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5845-122.39
76 17449 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5892-122.39
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-8
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
77 17450 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5891-122.39
78 17457 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.589-122.388
79 20312 AREADRAIN CALTRANS1 FTC01B 40.5902-122.394
80 15091 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5845-122.389
81 15094 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5836-122.39
82 15139 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5897-122.395
83 15538 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5864-122.391
84 15539 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5864-122.391
85 15556 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5898-122.395
86 17424 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5897-122.395
87 17425 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5898-122.395
88 17399 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01B 40.5848-122.39
89 17400 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5846-122.389
90 17410 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5846-122.39
91 18779 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5857-122.386
92 18780 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5855-122.386
93 17869 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01B 40.5864-122.388
94 17870 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01B 40.5862-122.387
95 17451 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5861-122.389
96 17453 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01B 40.586-122.389
97 17458 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5859-122.389
98 15138 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5895-122.396
99 15554 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.589-122.396
100 20176 AREADRAIN CALTRANS1 FTC01B 40.5865-122.392
101 20730 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.59-122.393
102 21389 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5845-122.391
103 20177 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5867-122.391
104 23534 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5866-122.391
105 17448 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5896-122.391
106 17437 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01B 40.5895-122.391
107 15097 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5826-122.389
108 15105 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5816-122.394
109 15109 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5827-122.395
110 17343 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5808-122.397
111 17347 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5843-122.395
112 17348 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5846-122.395
113 17352 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5836-122.394
114 17353 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5817-122.393
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-9
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
115 16832 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5812-122.388
116 15768 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5818-122.393
117 15771 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5812-122.394
118 15772 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5812-122.393
119 15773 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5811-122.393
120 17789 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.58-122.388
121 17792 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5792-122.387
122 17793 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5793-122.387 123 17806 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.579-122.387
124 17817 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5803-122.388 125 17818 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5802-122.388 126 17819 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5802-122.388
127 17421 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5856-122.395
128 17422 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5875-122.393 129 17426 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5875-122.394
130 17427 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5875-122.394
131 18666 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5809-122.397
132 17310 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5854-122.397
133 18724 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5792-122.387
134 18717 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5874-122.394 135 17261 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5846-122.398
136 17262 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5847-122.398
137 17265 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5851-122.398
138 17266 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5801-122.399
139 17411 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5817-122.388
140 17412 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5823-122.39
141 17413 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5823-122.39
142 17414 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5825-122.39
143 17417 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5822-122.39
144 17418 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5818-122.388 145 17419 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5816-122.388
146 17329 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5812-122.395
147 17331 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.585-122.396
148 17332 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5833-122.396
149 17341 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5808-122.396
150 17342 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5811-122.396
151 17358 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5816-122.394
152 17360 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5813-122.394
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-10
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
153 17362 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5813-122.395
154 17367 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5791-122.392
155 17356 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5826-122.394
156 18869 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5826-122.393
157 18868 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5824-122.394
158 15106 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5824-122.394
159 17357 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5825-122.394
160 15006 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5808-122.392
161 15101 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5822-122.391
162 15111 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.585-122.393
163 18746 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5842-122.393
164 15763 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5768-122.392
165 17258 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5803-122.4
166 17389 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5822-122.391 167 17392 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.581-122.392
168 17364 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5799-122.389
169 18748 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5833-122.393
170 18721 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5799-122.389 171 18432 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.583-122.392
172 19863 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5838-122.393
173 20060 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5759-122.392
174 15702 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5744-122.38
175 17748 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5741-122.379
176 17802 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5767-122.387 177 17839 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5768-122.381
178 20485 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.575-122.38
179 20486 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5751-122.38
180 18735 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5746-122.381
181 17242 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5826-122.403
182 17243 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5828-122.402
183 17311 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5851-122.393
184 17378 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5804-122.39
185 17382 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5851-122.392 186 17383 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.585-122.392
187 17384 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.585-122.392
188 17385 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5849-122.393 189 17386 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5852-122.393
190 17390 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5802-122.391
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-11
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
191 17393 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5803-122.391 192 17398 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5803-122.392
193 17415 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5804-122.39
194 17416 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5806-122.391
195 17370 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5789-122.389
196 15725 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5773-122.389
197 17308 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5856-122.393
198 17374 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5755-122.389
199 17372 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5757-122.389
200 15098 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5824-122.391
201 17257 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5832-122.402
202 17896 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5758-122.378
203 15096 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.583-122.39
204 20731 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5824-122.392
205 17328 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.581-122.395
206 17361 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5806-122.395
207 15770 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.581-122.394
208 17351 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5834-122.395
209 19647 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5837-122.394
210 17321 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5787-122.394
211 18897 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5786-122.394
212 17368 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.579-122.392
213 15569 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5861-122.393
214 17429 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5862-122.393
215 17430 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5868-122.393
216 15564 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5868-122.393
217 17439 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5863-122.392
218 17428 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5861-122.393
219 20246 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5785-122.396
220 23254 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5846-122.396
221 17345 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5804-122.397
222 17423 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5873-122.393 223 23519 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS1 FTC01C-1 40.5872-122.394 224 15700 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5738-122.379
225 10044 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5734-122.377
226 18855 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5831-122.402
227 23564 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5823-122.395
228 23889 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.577-122.392
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-12
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
229 17397 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.582-122.392
230 17335 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5852-122.397
231 17309 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5853-122.397
232 17844 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01C-1 40.5752-122.381
233 17274 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5892-122.403
234 17278 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5901-122.404
235 17291 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5893-122.4
236 15612 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5897-122.403
237 17275 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5895-122.402
238 23697 AREADRAIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5895-122.402
239 17292 CATCHBASIN CITY1 FTC01A 40.5887-122.399
240 15327 CATCHBASIN CITY2 NA 40.556-122.362
241 15330 CATCHBASIN CITY2 NA 40.5555-122.362
242 15334 AREADRAIN CITY2 NA 40.5547-122.362
243 15326 AREADRAIN CITY2 NA 40.5564-122.363
244 17949 CATCHBASIN CITY2 NA 40.5552-122.362
245 18016 CATCHBASIN CITY2 NA 40.5768-122.361
246 11356 AREADRAIN CITY2 NA 40.56-122.357
247 15687 AREADRAIN CITY2 FTC03C 40.568-122.372
248 10826 CATCHBASIN CITY2 FTC02A 40.5542-122.353
249 11345 CATCHBASIN CITY2 FTC02A 40.5494-122.353
250 11347 CATCHBASIN CITY2 FTC02A 40.5488-122.353
251 11348 CATCHBASIN CITY2 FTC02A 40.5492-122.353
252 11346 CATCHBASIN CITY2 FTC02A 40.5509-122.353
253 17967 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5727-122.369
254 19729 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5731-122.368
255 18669 AREADRAIN CITY3 NA 40.5721-122.362
256 17976 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5727-122.366
257 17994 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5726-122.363
258 17995 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.572-122.363
259 17999 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5721-122.364
260 18000 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5726-122.364
261 18002 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.572-122.363
262 18005 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5735-122.365
263 18007 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5721-122.363
264 19673 AREADRAIN CITY3 NA 40.5723-122.364
265 11125 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5791-122.354
266 11126 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5801-122.354
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-13
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
267 10714 AREADRAIN CITY3 NA 40.5755-122.358
268 11212 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5773-122.355
269 11422 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5736-122.353
270 11425 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5763-122.358
271 11426 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5776-122.358
272 11427 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5755-122.358
273 11429 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5786-122.358
274 11430 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5767-122.358
275 11431 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5768-122.359
276 11434 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5773-122.358
277 11435 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5753-122.356
278 11437 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5764-122.358
279 11438 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5774-122.358
280 11440 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5757-122.358
281 11441 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5752-122.358
282 11448 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5803-122.358
283 11450 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5801-122.358
284 11453 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5786-122.354
285 11454 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5772-122.353
286 11457 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5754-122.354
287 11458 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5785-122.355
288 11459 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5781-122.355
289 11467 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5756-122.352
290 11469 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5779-122.353
291 11470 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.579-122.353
292 11471 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5756-122.353
293 11474 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5748-122.352
294 11476 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5753-122.353
295 12011 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5748-122.35
296 12012 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5747-122.35
297 13113 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5756-122.349
298 13011 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5753-122.355
299 11408 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5723-122.353
300 11420 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5717-122.353
301 11423 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5709-122.352
302 14209 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5712-122.35
303 14213 AREADRAIN CITY3 NA 40.5728-122.35
304 11412 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5729-122.355
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-14
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
305 11409 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5734-122.353
306 11416 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5741-122.355
307 11428 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5746-122.358
308 11269 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5822-122.355
309 11417 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5725-122.353
310 11421 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5724-122.353
311 11451 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5829-122.358
312 11452 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5829-122.358
313 11473 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5748-122.351
314 11477 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5747-122.351
315 12013 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5748-122.351
316 12997 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5827-122.358
317 21177 AREADRAIN CITY3 NA 40.5762-122.354
318 11455 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5785-122.354
319 12903 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5783-122.354
320 11462 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5759-122.355
321 11463 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5759-122.355
322 11456 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5793-122.354
323 17657 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03D 40.5716-122.37
324 17977 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03D 40.5713-122.367
325 23414 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03D 40.5716-122.371
326 23408 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03D 40.5716-122.37
327 11439 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.5787-122.358
328 10851 CATCHBASIN CITY3 NA 40.582-122.358
329 17950 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5613-122.362
330 15318 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5608-122.363
331 15319 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5613-122.363
332 17978 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5666-122.363
333 17987 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5654-122.363
334 17988 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5662-122.363
335 17991 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5639-122.362
336 17992 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5639-122.362
337 11377 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5647-122.356
338 11379 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5682-122.359
339 11381 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5673-122.359
340 11387 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5675-122.357
341 11394 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5678-122.353
342 11395 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5647-122.353
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-15
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
343 11396 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5648-122.353
344 11406 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5648-122.353
345 13896 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5675-122.357
346 14519 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5686-122.354
347 11398 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5682-122.356
348 11405 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5652-122.353
349 11407 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5674-122.353
350 14520 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5681-122.354
351 16407 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5673-122.363
352 15286 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5673-122.363
353 17986 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5674-122.363
354 17979 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5674-122.363
355 17981 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.568-122.363
356 23691 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03A-1 40.5607-122.364
357 17966 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03B-1 40.5709-122.368
358 17972 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03B-1 40.5708-122.368
359 18791 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS3 FTC03B-1 40.5712-122.361 360 18009 AREADRAIN CALTRANS3 FTC03B-1 40.5709-122.361
361 13645 AREADRAIN CALTRANS3 FTC03B-1 40.5709-122.36
362 13646 AREADRAIN CALTRANS3 FTC03B-1 40.5712-122.36
363 18829 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03B-1 40.57-122.365
364 18831 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03B-1 40.57-122.365
365 18835 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03B-1 40.5699-122.365
366 18785 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03B-1 40.5709-122.364
367 11389 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03B-1 40.5712-122.358
368 11390 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03B-1 40.5722-122.358
369 11393 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03B-1 40.5732-122.358
370 11392 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03B-1 40.5712-122.358
371 11388 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03B-1 40.5723-122.358
372 15684 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.5692-122.372
373 17658 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.5679-122.37
374 17959 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.5658-122.369
375 17963 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.5667-122.369
376 17964 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.5637-122.365
377 19676 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.568-122.37
378 17973 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.5703-122.369
379 15045 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.5683-122.368
380 15046 AREADRAIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.5685-122.368
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-16
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
381 16522 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.5683-122.368
382 16524 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.5691-122.368
383 17659 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.5696-122.37
384 16565 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.5696-122.369
385 17955 CATCHBASIN CITY3 FTC03C 40.568-122.369
386 10131 AREADRAIN CITY4 NA 40.5906-122.353
387 11127 CATCHBASIN CITY4 NA 40.5894-122.351
388 11165 CATCHBASIN CITY4 NA 40.5856-122.346
389 11168 CATCHBASIN CITY4 NA 40.5858-122.347
390 11507 AREADRAIN CITY4 NA 40.591-122.354
391 11514 CATCHBASIN CITY4 NA 40.5862-122.353
392 11515 CATCHBASIN CITY4 NA 40.5864-122.353
393 12003 CATCHBASIN CITY4 NA 40.5856-122.347
394 12103 CATCHBASIN CITY4 NA 40.5868-122.345
395 13003 CATCHBASIN CITY4 NA 40.5859-122.355
396 14172 AREADRAIN CITY4 NA 40.5859-122.347
397 14652 AREADRAIN CITY4 NA 40.5895-122.351
398 11505 CATCHBASIN CITY4 NA 40.5876-122.353
399 10786 CATCHBASIN CITY4 NA 40.5908-122.351
400 11510 AREADRAIN CITY4 NA 40.5894-122.353
401 11508 AREADRAIN CITY4 NA 40.5892-122.353
402 10345 AREADRAIN CITY4 FTC04A-1 40.585-122.35
403 10884 CATCHBASIN CITY4 NA 40.5885-122.353
404 11341 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04A-1 40.5864-122.351
405 11216 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04A-1 40.5888-122.35
406 12040 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04A-1 40.5889-122.349
407 12041 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04A-1 40.5897-122.349
408 12049 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04A-1 40.5884-122.351
409 12053 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04A-1 40.5859-122.349
410 12056 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04A-1 40.5858-122.35
411 11512 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04A-1 40.5862-122.352
412 12064 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04A-1 40.588-122.347
413 12066 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04A-1 40.5859-122.347
414 21201 AREADRAIN CITY4 FTC04A-1 40.5885-122.349
415 12039 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04B-1 40.5881-122.346
416 12092 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04B-1 40.5893-122.345
417 12095 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04B-1 40.5906-122.345
418 12098 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04B-1 40.5907-122.345
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-17
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
419 12102 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04B-1 40.5906-122.346
420 12173 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04B-1 40.5858-122.339
421 23344 AREADRAIN CITY4 FTC04B-1 40.5866-122.341
422 12113 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04B-1 40.5879-122.343
423 12034 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04C 40.5856-122.343
424 12035 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04C 40.5855-122.344
425 12171 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04C 40.5857-122.341
426 12131 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04C 40.5855-122.34
427 12144 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04C 40.5856-122.341
428 12145 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04C 40.5854-122.339
429 12147 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04C 40.5844-122.339
430 12146 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04C 40.5856-122.339
431 11484 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04D 40.5886-122.358
432 11487 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04D 40.5862-122.356
433 11494 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04D 40.5913-122.358
434 11495 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04D 40.5931-122.358
435 12765 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04D 40.5869-122.358
436 12766 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04D 40.5861-122.357
437 21025 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04D 40.5862-122.358
438 11491 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04D 40.5873-122.358
439 23109 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04D 40.5929-122.358
440 23455 AREADRAIN CITY4 FTC04D 40.5879-122.358
441 11502 CATCHBASIN CITY4 FTC04D 40.5932-122.358
442 15381 CATCHBASIN CITY5 40.6299-122.377
443 18218 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.6319-122.39
444 18219 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.6319-122.39
445 18313 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.6245-122.381
446 18328 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.632-122.383
447 18338 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.6256-122.375
448 18340 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.6247-122.373
449 18343 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.6237-122.373
450 18345 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.6226-122.374
451 18351 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.6285-122.373
452 18352 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.6284-122.373
453 18353 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.6256-122.373
454 18356 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.6316-122.379
455 18357 CATCHBASIN CITY5 NA 40.6311-122.375
456 12257 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5651-122.324
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-18
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
457 12259 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5639-122.324
458 12261 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5663-122.325
459 12301 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5653-122.32
460 12304 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5651-122.32
461 11949 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5621-122.339
462 11951 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5609-122.339
463 12239 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5636-122.328
464 11342 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5609-122.351
465 13039 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5636-122.34
466 11874 AREADRAIN CITY6 NA 40.5636-122.342
467 10659 AREADRAIN CITY6 NA 40.5656-122.346
468 10662 AREADRAIN CITY6 NA 40.5645-122.346
469 11372 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.561-122.353
470 11893 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5637-122.35
471 11894 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5637-122.35
472 11895 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5639-122.35
473 11897 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5639-122.347
474 11898 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5639-122.347
475 11899 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5637-122.347
476 11902 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.571-122.351
477 11903 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.571-122.35
478 10667 AREADRAIN CITY6 NA 40.564-122.349
479 11403 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5637-122.353
480 11901 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5637-122.348
481 21072 AREADRAIN CITY6 NA 40.5652-122.35
482 10488 AREADRAIN CITY6 NA 40.5639-122.32
483 10646 AREADRAIN CITY6 FTC06A-1 40.5674-122.345
484 11988 CATCHBASIN CITY6 FTC06A-1 40.5711-122.341
485 11872 CATCHBASIN CITY6 FTC06A-1 40.5709-122.342
486 11908 CATCHBASIN CITY6 FTC06A-1 40.5651-122.345
487 11913 CATCHBASIN CITY6 FTC06A-1 40.5711-122.342
488 23146 CATCHBASIN CITY6 FTC06A-1 40.5693-122.34
489 23149 CATCHBASIN CITY6 FTC06A-1 40.569-122.339
490 23818 AREADRAIN CITY6 FTC06A-1 40.5712-122.342
491 25134 CATCHBASIN CITY6 FTC06A-1 40.57-122.34
492 25056 CATCHBASIN CITY6 NA 40.5638-122.328
493 15785 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5742-122.391
494 17221 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5731-122.391
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-19
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
495 17545 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5344-122.384
496 18534 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5195-122.381
497 15736 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5712-122.386
498 17713 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5684-122.381
499 17743 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5703-122.383
500 17745 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5708-122.382
501 17746 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5704-122.383
502 17771 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5694-122.378
503 17689 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5708-122.384
504 17662 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5691-122.379
505 17691 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5697-122.384
506 17695 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5679-122.381
507 19155 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5712-122.385
508 17563 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5496-122.388
509 17564 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5495-122.388
510 17704 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5641-122.382
511 17720 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5637-122.38
512 17726 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5639-122.381
513 17666 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5604-122.386
514 16542 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5375-122.389
515 15861 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5485-122.387
516 15884 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5348-122.385
517 15898 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5196-122.384
518 17503 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5205-122.382
519 17505 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5181-122.382
520 17501 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5223-122.383
521 17502 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5214-122.383
522 16882 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5347-122.388
523 17549 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5326-122.385
524 17552 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5388-122.386
525 17553 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5356-122.387
526 17479 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5171-122.382
527 17565 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5464-122.387
528 18451 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5331-122.385
529 20052 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5249-122.383
530 19627 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5354-122.387
531 21004 AREADRAIN CALTRANS7 NA 40.5292-122.383
532 17189 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5544-122.39
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-20
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
533 15860 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5474-122.387
534 19702 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5418-122.386
535 17546 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5293-122.384
536 15902 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5227-122.384
537 15065 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5377-122.384
538 17554 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.539-122.385
539 15868 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5383-122.384
540 17561 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5374-122.383
541 15862 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5461-122.387
542 19862 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5675-122.385
543 17731 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5652-122.38
544 17719 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5652-122.38
545 17227 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.574-122.392
546 17684 AREADRAIN CITY7 NA 40.5735-122.387
547 17692 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5731-122.386
548 17687 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5727-122.385
549 17676 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5723-122.383
550 17736 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5719-122.382
551 17737 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5717-122.382
552 17754 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5711-122.38
553 17752 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.571-122.38
554 16489 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5673-122.385
555 23420 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.573-122.377
556 23423 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5719-122.377
557 17557 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5306-122.382
558 17226 CATCHBASIN CITY7 NA 40.5733-122.392
559 15787 AREADRAIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5687-122.391
560 17210 CATCHBASIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5677-122.39
561 17211 CATCHBASIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5673-122.39
562 15741 AREADRAIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5684-122.387
563 19176 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS7 FTC07A 40.569-122.388
564 15744 AREADRAIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5691-122.389
565 15745 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS7 FTC07A 40.5691-122.388
566 16834 AREADRAIN CALTRANS7 FTC07A 40.57-122.388
567 17682 CATCHBASIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5636-122.385
568 19169 CATCHBASIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5668-122.389
569 19177 CATCHBASIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5686-122.388
570 19179 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS7 FTC07A 40.5688-122.388
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-21
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
571 19180 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS7 FTC07A 40.5685-122.388
572 19187 CATCHBASIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5646-122.385
573 21814 AREADRAIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5655-122.386
574 21815 AREADRAIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5652-122.387
575 17218 CATCHBASIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5685-122.389
576 21812 AREADRAIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5656-122.386
577 19156 AREADRAIN CITY7 FTC07A 40.5658-122.387
578 17214 CATCHBASIN CITY7 FTC07B-1 40.5649-122.391
579 17220 CATCHBASIN CITY7 FTC07B-1 40.5647-122.39
580 15801 AREADRAIN CALTRANS7 FTC07B-1 40.5659-122.388
581 15803 AREADRAIN CALTRANS7 FTC07B-1 40.5623-122.388
582 15793 AREADRAIN CITY7 FTC07B-1 40.5624-122.385
583 17679 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS7 FTC07B-1 40.5651-122.388 584 17683 CATCHBASIN CITY7 FTC07B-1 40.5634-122.385
585 19185 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS7 FTC07B-1 40.5642-122.387 586 15810 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS7 FTC07B-1 40.5651-122.388 587 21819 AREADRAIN CITY7 FTC07B-1 40.5647-122.387
588 15805 AREADRAIN CITY7 FTC07B-1 40.5636-122.389
589 17667 CATCHBASIN CITY7 FTC07C 40.559-122.387
590 15031 AREADRAIN CITY8 NA 40.6253-122.369
591 15232 AREADRAIN CALTRANS8 NA 40.6229-122.367
592 16576 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6128-122.387
593 16578 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6127-122.385
594 16580 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6116-122.384
595 16582 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6109-122.381
596 16583 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6136-122.376
597 15362 AREADRAIN CITY8 NA 40.6251-122.368
598 15574 AREADRAIN CITY8 NA 40.6206-122.399
599 18264 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6095-122.38
600 18279 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6096-122.379
601 18280 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6098-122.379
602 18173 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6227-122.404
603 18174 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6273-122.405
604 18175 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6265-122.405
605 18181 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6258-122.404
606 18151 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6171-122.393
607 18392 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6128-122.369
608 18393 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6107-122.37
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-22
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
609 18394 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.611-122.369
610 18403 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6228-122.368
611 19026 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6121-122.378
612 19615 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6112-122.368
613 20166 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6241-122.368
614 18220 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6424-122.367
615 14529 AREADRAIN CALTRANS8 NA 40.623-122.366
616 14528 AREADRAIN CALTRANS8 NA 40.6232-122.366
617 13634 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6344-122.365
618 18400 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6151-122.367
619 16587 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6129-122.381
620 16573 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6129-122.384
621 18293 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6128-122.37
622 16581 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6107-122.385
623 19619 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6131-122.369
624 23849 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6246-122.368
625 16585 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6123-122.38
626 25150 AREADRAIN CITY8 NA 40.612-122.37
627 18256 CATCHBASIN CITY8 NA 40.6138-122.387
628 19555 CATCHBASIN CITY9 NA 40.6066-122.376
629 12790 CATCHBASIN CITY9 NA 40.5908-122.351
630 13558 CATCHBASIN CITY 10 NA 40.5764-122.324
631 13246 CATCHBASIN CITY 10 NA 40.5784-122.321
632 13249 CATCHBASIN CITY 10 NA 40.5784-122.32
633 20752 AREADRAIN CITY 10 NA 40.5762-122.324
634 14382 CATCHBASIN CITY 10 NA 40.5731-122.323
635 15617 AREADRAIN CITY 11 NA 40.5908-122.406
636 17106 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS 11 NA 40.5859-122.41
637 17108 CATCHBASIN CITY 11 NA 40.5858-122.409
638 18477 AREADRAIN CITY 11 NA 40.5891-122.405
639 17113 AREADRAIN CALTRANS 11 NA 40.5861-122.408
640 18226 CATCHBASIN CITY 12 NA 40.5988-122.387
641 16487 CATCHBASIN CITY 13 NA 40.5386-122.353
642 16488 CATCHBASIN CITY 13 NA 40.5389-122.354
643 11668 CATCHBASIN CITY 13 NA 40.5381-122.348
644 11293 CATCHBASIN CITY 14 NA 40.5027-122.305
645 14398 CATCHBASIN CITY 14 NA 40.4905-122.295
646 16659 CATCHBASIN CITY 15 NA 40.5733-122.416
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) D
-23
#
City's Catch
Basin ID Catch Basin Type Owner TMA
Large Full
Capture
Catchment
Latitude Longitude
647 16662 CATCHBASIN CITY 15 NA 40.5749-122.416
648 12382 CATCHBASIN CITY 15 NA 40.5785-122.321
649 12155 CATCHBASIN CITY 15 NA 40.5819-122.339
650 15329 AREADRAIN CITY 15 NA 40.5555-122.363
651 11464 CATCHBASIN CITY 15 NA 40.5795-122.353
652 14780 AREADRAIN CALTRANS 15 NA 40.5839-122.357
653 11906 CATCHBASIN CITY 15 NA 40.5712-122.347
654 10610 AREADRAIN CALTRANS 15 NA 40.5784-122.339
655 11443 CATCHBASIN CALTRANS 15 NA 40.5837-122.358
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) E-1
Appendix E
Cost Assumptions for Full Capture Systems
The cost estimates presented should be considered preliminary planning-level estimates and may not include all costs associated with the design, planning, purchase, construction/installation, and operation and maintenance associated with each potential full capture system. Assumptions associated with estimating the costs for small and large systems are included. Costs estimates presented are based on the most readily available information at the time this Evaluation was conducted. Comparisons of capital and on-going operation and maintenance (O&M) costs between small and large full capture systems are included to assist San Mateo with the evaluation of the most cost-effective approaches to achieving mandated trash load reductions. More detailed cost estimates will be needed should San Mateo decide to move forward with full capture systems (large or small).
Large Trash Full Capture Systems
Base (i.e., planning, design, materials, and construction) and maintenance costs for large trash full capture systems were calculated using the information compiled from a comprehensive review of cost estimates and bids from existing projects in the Bay Area. The base costs for hydrodynamic separators (HDSs), nutrient/debris separation baffle box (NSBB/DSBB), and gross solids removal devices (GSRD) generally increase with the expected 1-year flow, although each site will have specific considerations (e.g., utility conflicts and permitting) that must be accounted for to accurately estimate costs. To develop planning-level cost estimates, a power regression was developed based on the review of existing cost information.
The following assumptions were used to determine base costs for large trash full capture systems:
• The following formula was used to estimate base costs for baffle box devices: $520,499 x ln[Design Flow] – $1,000,000
• 30% of base costs are included in the final costs to account for design costs, administration, and construction contingencies;
• Systems are installed in areas which do not require major utility relocation, property or easement acquisition or environmental permitting;
• Systems in channels require the installation of a concrete pad, and may be significantly less expensive if the concrete is already installed;
• Total costs are presented in the assumed construction year (2019) dollars, and no financing or discounting costs are included;
• Large systems are assumed to have a lifetime of 50 years and will need to be replaced after this time; and
• Cost sharing agreements with other agencies such as Caltrans are not factored into this analysis.
Base costs are much higher for large full capture systems than small systems, however, they have significantly lower maintenance costs over the long-term. Lower maintenance costs often result in lower lifecycle costs for large systems, compared with small systems. Most costs associated with large systems are not associated with the system itself, rather with the planning, design, installation, utility conflicts, and permitting. Installation costs for large systems include mobilization and demobilization, traffic
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) E-2
control, stormwater pollution prevention plan preparation, contractor’s markup, excavation, hauling, shoring, backfilling, dewatering, surface replacement, bypass pumping, diversion structure, and connections to the storm drainage system. As a result, the overall costs for designing, purchasing and constructing a large HDS or NSBB/DSBB system often exceed $1M.
The following assumptions were used to determine operation and maintenance cost estimates for large trash full capture systems:
• Baffle box devices require one maintenance event per year and in-channel netting devices require four maintenance events per year with each maintenance event taking seven hours; and • Each maintenance event requires one Vactor Truck Operator, one City Lead Storm Drain Maintenance Worker, and two temporary City Storm Drain Maintenance Workers at annual FTE rates of $121,700, $111,965, ad $92,240, respectively.
Figure D1 contains the estimated base cost curve for a baffle box system under different storm flows.
Many of these costs were derived from real cost data provided by Schaff and Wheeler. 8 Figure E1. Base cost (including 30% contingency costs) assumptions for a large underground Baffle Box system. 8 Also includes cities of Mountain View, San Bruno, San Mateo, South San Francisco and personal communication with Schaaf & Wheeler Consulting Engineers staff. Maintenance costs were provided by cities of San Jose and Vallejo Flood and Wastewater. Citations can be found in the References Section of this report. All base and O&M cost estimates presented in Table 9 were smoothed out using best fit regression curves.
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
$1,400,000
$1,600,000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Base Cost
Design Flow (cfs)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) E-3
Small Trash Full Capture Systems
The following assumptions were used to determine base costs for purchasing and installing small trash full capture systems:
• Connector pipe screens or catch basin inserts are assumed to be installed in catch basin with dimensions of 24” x 36”; and
• Manufacture and installation costs for each connector pipe screen or catch basin insert is $1,000 per system. Small systems vendors usually lump the costs of manufacturing and installation together.9
The following assumptions were used to determine cleaning, replacement and maintenance cost estimates:
• Connector pipe screens or catch basin inserts are cleaned an average of four times a year with each maintenance event lasting one hour;
• Each maintenance event requires one City Lead Storm Drain Maintenance Worker and one temporary City Storm Drain Maintenance Worker at an annual FTE rate of $121,700 and $61,655, respectively;
10 • Replacement of connector pipe screens and catch basin inserts is assumed to occur every 20 years; and
Replacement costs are $1,000, identical to initial manufacture/installation costs 9 Costs for small full capture systems can range from $450-2400 per system depending on the manufacturer and number of systems installed. 10 Annual FTE rates were provided by the City of Redding, and one full time equivalent position was assumed to be 2,000 staff hours in a given year. Although cost estimates in this report used City staff FTE rates, the City may choose to hire subcontractors. However, prices will vary depending on labor costs and the need to purchase equipment. Additionally, the City may be unable to hire non-union subcontractors to maintain the catch basins
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) F-1
Appendix F
Large System Siting and Sizing
When selecting a large trash full capture system, it is important to consider the size of the drainage area, hydraulic losses across the system when the system is full, the permitting requirements, system maintenance and access, property rights, and utility clearance. All factors should be weighed against the system type, construction costs and future operation and maintenance (O&M) costs to ensure maximum trash load reduction per dollar spent.
Large systems can be installed off-line from the main trunk with a diversion structure to re-direct the treatment flow rate. Off-line installations optimize system size since they are not required to have an overflow capacity equal to the capacity of the existing storm drain line. There is the potential for increasing the number of utility conflicts with an off-line installation since it requires a greater footprint for the facility. Existing utilities and right-of-way restrictions may dictate where a large system can be installed. When the City decides to move forward with implementation of any large trash full capture system, the location of existing utilities will need to be evaluated. The presence of utilities at proposed installation locations must be field verified prior to starting any system design.
For sizing large systems, the rational method for estimating peak runoff described in the Santa Clara County Drainage Manual (Schaaf and Wheeler, 2007) was used. This method has a long history of usefulness for stormwater conveyance system design in highly urbanized areas characterized by relatively small watersheds with largely impervious areas. The rational method uses the following equation to calculate peak runoff:
QT = k CiT A
Where: Q = peak discharge (cfs)
T = recurrence interval (years)
k = 1.008 (most often rounded to 1)
C = a dimensionless runoff coefficient
i = the design rainfall intensity (inches per hour) for a duration equal to the time of concentration11 for the basin A = drainage area (acres)
Runoff coefficients (C) described in the manual for soil hydrologic group D and listed in Table C1 were applied to the City’s land uses within the catchments or sub-catchments. A recurrence interval (T) of oneyear, consistent with the definition of a full capture system, was used. The design rainfall intensity (i) was developed for each catchment/sub-catchment using a formula provided the Drainage Manual. The intensity varies by catchment depending on the Time of Concentration, and therefore is a more accurate method than using a uniform rainfall intensity (i.e. the 1-year 1-hour storm). In general, the larger the catchment, the longer it will take the peak flow to reach a point downstream. This difference in time will cause the precipitation intensity (i) to vary by more than a factor of 2 depending on the catchment. 11 Time of Concentration is the time needed for water to flow from the most remote point of a catchment to the flow point, or can be thought of as the time between peak rainfall and peak flow. Rainfall intensity will vary significantly based on this length of time. Rainfall intensities were verified to match the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) precipitation frequency dataserver (http://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds_map_cont.html)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) F-2
Table C1. Runoff Coefficients for Sizing Large Systems
Land Use Runoff Coefficient (C)
Arterial Road 0.80
Commercial 0.80
Freeways 0.85
Industrial 0.75
Railroad 0.50
Rangeland/Forest 0.30
Residential - High Density 0.75
Residential - Low Density 0.45
Residential – Rural 0.40
Retail 0.80
Schools 0.60
Urban Open Space 0.45
Estimated treatment flow rates for all of the catchments and subcatchments were calculated using the rational method. Since the rational method is primarily used for catchments under 300 acres, a scaling factor was used to more closely approximate the one-year flow of larger catchments. The Water Board has indicated that a simplified rational method that uses a rainfall intensity of 0.2 in/hr is acceptable for sizing large systems over 50 acres if there is limited space available. However, that methodology would significantly undersize smaller large systems by more than half in many cases. It is better to use the more accurate calculation used in this evaluation for estimating the one-year flow so that there is less bypass of the treatment system.
A more advanced method using hydrologic modelling software such as the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Modeling System (HEC-HMS) could be used to more accurately calculate flows for larger catchments.
However, that is not necessary because all larger catchments would contain a diversion or large overflow to allow much of the higher flows to bypass the treatment system. Although it changes based on the characteristics of the catchment, a rough approximation of the relationship between catchment area and one-year flow is presented in Figure C1. Treatment flow rates for each of the catchments and subcatchments are listed in Table C2 and were used to estimate the sizes and costs of potential large trash full capture systems proposed to treat each catchment. Flow was reduced for Leslie Creek at the Wastewater Plant to account for using the channel for detention and the limitations of the pump station that would need to be installed as part of the system.
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator) F-3
Figure F1. Approximate relationship between catchment size and design one-year flow. 0 50
100
150
200
0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200
Design Flow (cfs)
Catchment Area (acres)
APPROVED
Packet Pg. 386 Attachment: Previous Trash Amendment Staff Report 5-13-23 (4.11(a)--Purchase of Vacuum Excavator)
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept the improvements in Salt Creek Heights Subdivision–Unit 3 (S-15-07/PD-11-07) as satisfactorily complete; and adopt Resolution accepting the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision–Unit 3 (S-15-07/PD-11-07) streets for maintenance and operation.
Fiscal Impact
There will be cumulative impacts to the Public Works Department due to the increase in public street infrastructure requiring annual maintenance, especially the asphalt pavement. The project will generate an incremental increase in State of California gas-tax funds based on population and point-of-origin sales; however, the increase in these revenues falls short of the anticipated annualized maintenance cost.
In addition, there will be an incremental increase in the City of Redding (City) utility costs due to the additional infrastructure. Generally, except for the Storm-Drain Utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any increase in annual maintenance costs. The StormDrain Utility is pressed with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover.
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the improvements. Under this alternative, the City would be inconsistent with a long-standing policy of maintaining streets and infrastructure following the completion of the improvements in accordance with City standards.
MEETING DATE: April 2, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Accept Improvements and Adopt Resolution Accepting the Streets in the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision - Unit 3 (S-15-07/PD-11-07) Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 387
Report to Redding City Council March 26, 2024
Re: 4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3 Page 2 Background/Analysis
The developer, Sierra Pacific Industries, has satisfactorily completed the installation of all improvements in Unit 3 of the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision, (S-15-07/PD-11-07). The subdivision is located west of Buenaventura Boulevard and north of Eureka Way. A map showing the location of the subdivision is attached.
The Salt Creek Heights Subdivision – Unit 3, (S-15-07/PD-11-07) was approved by the Planning Commission on May 3, 2010, and all conditions of the map have been fulfilled. The final map for the subdivision was approved by the Council on October 15, 2019. All improvements have been satisfactorily completed, and all required fees have been paid. This subdivision was also required to form a landscape maintenance district, which has been formed.
The developer has completed all the conditioned improvements for the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision – Unit 3, (S-15-07/PD-11-07). It is prudent to accept the improvements and adopt a resolution accepting streets for maintenance and operation.
The resolution has been approved to form by the City Attorney.
Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). On June 15, 2010, after considering public comments and alternative actions, Council certified the Environmental Impact Report (EIR-1-08) for the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision, and approved the project, thereby satisfying the requirements of CEQA. No further action is required.
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.
Attachments
^Resolution - Streets and Maintenance
^Location Map
Previous PC Report 05-11-10
Previous Staff Report 06-15-10
Previous Staff Report 10-15-19
Packet Pg. 388
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING
ACCEPTING FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION THE STREETS
IN SALT CREEK SUBDIVISION, UNIT 3, S-15-07/PD-11-07
WHEREAS, improvements have been satisfactorily completed in Salt Creek Subdivision, Unit 3, S-15-07/PD-11-07; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the streets in Salt Creek Subdivision, Unit 3, S-15-07/PD-11-07, be accepted into the City street system for maintenance and operation by the City; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the City Council, pursuant to the authority provided in Section 1806 of the California Streets and Highways Code, that the streets in Salt Creek Subdivision, Unit 3, S-15-07/PD-11-07, as shown on the map attached and incorporated herein, are accepted into the City street system for maintenance and operation by the City.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 2nd day of April, 2024, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: ^Resolution - Streets and Maintenance (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Packet Pg. 391
Attachment: Previous PC Report 05-11-10 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Packet Pg. 392
Attachment: Previous PC Report 05-11-10 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Packet Pg. 393
Attachment: Previous PC Report 05-11-10 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Packet Pg. 394
Attachment: Previous PC Report 05-11-10 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Packet Pg. 395
Attachment: Previous PC Report 05-11-10 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Packet Pg. 396
Attachment: Previous PC Report 05-11-10 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Packet Pg. 397
Attachment: Previous PC Report 05-11-10 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Packet Pg. 398
Attachment: Previous PC Report 05-11-10 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Packet Pg. 399
Attachment: Previous PC Report 05-11-10 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Packet Pg. 400
Attachment: Previous PC Report 05-11-10 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Packet Pg. 401
Attachment: Previous PC Report 05-11-10 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) ITEM NO.
6. 2
MEETING DATE June 15, 2010
Recommendation
CITY OF REDDING
REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL
DATE: June 3, 2010
S- 101- 135/ L-OIO- 230/ L-0I 0-211- 043/ L-OIO-075
FROM: Jim Hamilton, Development Services Director
SUBJECT: Public Hearing re Salt Creek Heights Subdivision and Development Agreement; Adopt Resolution
CertifYing EIR- I- 08; Adopt Resolution Approving
Tentative Subdivision Map Application S- 15- 07
and Planned Development Plan Application
PD- II-07; Offer Ordinance for First Reading for
Rezoning Application RZ-6- 07; and Offer
Ordinance for First Reading for Salt Creek Heights
Development Agreement, by Sierra Pacific
Industries, Inc.
At the conclusion ofthe public hearing, it is the recommendation ofthe Planning Commission that the City Council ( Council) approve the project as proposed by Sierra Pacific Industries, which includes the following Council actions:
I. Adoption of the attached resolution' certifYing Environmental Impact Report EIR- I- 08.
2. Adoption ofthe attached resolution approving Tentative Map Application S- 15- 07 and Planned Development Plan Application PD- I 1- 07.
3. Offering the attached ordinance for approval ofRezoning Application RZ-6- 07 for firstreading by title only. . "
4. Offering the attached ordinance for approval of the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision Development Agreement for first reading by title only.
Development Services staff is recommending that the Council reconsider an element of the Commission' s recommendation relative to the approval of six lots proposed by Sierra Pacific Industries within areas that are designated as " Open Space" on the General Plan Land Use Diagram and the currently adopted Zoning Map.
Background
On May II, 20 I 0, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing to consider the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision/Planned Development Project ( Project) and by a 4 to 2 vote, recommended that the City Council certify the Project Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approve the applications constituting the Salt Creek Heights Subdivision Project and Development Agreement. The two Commissioners who voted against the project approval supported the overall design ofthe Project, Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 06-15-10 (4.11(b)--Project Acceptance, Salt Creek Heights Unit 3) Report to City Council
Re: Public Hearing re Salt Creek Heights Subdivision/ Planned Development June 3. 2010