Redding City Council
May 7, 2024

Agenda
Regular Meeting
Redding City Council
Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA

May 7, 2024
6:00 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER - MAYOR TENESSA AUDETTE
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation - Lori Moretti, Chaplain for the Redding Police and Fire Departments.

C. Roll Call

2. PRESENTATIONS

2A. Presentation by Rebecca Daricek, Site Director for Nation’s Finest, providing information relative to serving Veterans in the City of Redding.

3. PUBLIC COMMENT - for non-agendized matters within the city’s jurisdiction.

PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT, CITY COUNCIL CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON PUBLIC

COMMENT ITEMS

The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for 30 minutes total, at the beginning of the meeting for Publ ic Comment for non -agendized matters within the City’s jurisdiction.

The Mayor will determine the order of the speakers. If 30 minutes is not adequate to accommodate all of the individuals who have submitted a Speaker Request Form to the City Clerk, the Council will trail this item to the end of the open session agenda. The remaining speakers will address the City Council at that time.

If anyone wishes to address the City Council on any item considered at this meeting before or during Council’s consideration of that item, please fill out a blue Speaker Request Form, located in the lighted alcoves at the back of the Council Chambers, and submit it to the City Clerk. The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for each agenda item. Staff reports are available on-line at the City’s web site at www.cityofredding.gov or in the Public View binder located on the podium at the north side of the Chambers.

PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES. THANK YOU.

Redding City Council May 7, 2024

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains items considered routine and/or which have been individually scrutinized by City Council Members and are anticipated to require no further deliberation. If a member of the public wishes to address an item on the Consent Calend ar, please fill out a Speaker Request Form and submit it to the City Clerk before the Consent Calendar is considered. It shall be the prerogative of any Council Member, before the Consent Calendar is acted upon, to: (1) comment on an item; (2) respond to any public comment on an item; (3) request the record reflect an abstention or nay vote on an item; or (4) remove an item and place it on the Regular portion of the agenda for delivery of a staff report and/or an extended discussion or deliberation.

4(a). Approve Minutes: Special Meeting – City of Redding General Plan of March 26, 2024; and Special Meeting of April 1, 2024.

4.2(a). Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 40th Amendment to City of Redding (City) Budget Resolution No. 2023 -060 re -appropriating the City’s Airport Division funds in the amount of $50,000 from the groundwater monitoring well account to engineering and design services to fund the City Public Works’ Engineering Division staff to design the reconstruction of the Redding Regional Airport public parking lot.

4.2(b). Approve the following actions relative to the St ate of California’s Housing and Community Development’s Community Development Block Grant -Disaster Recovery Workforce Development Program grant application:
(1) Adopt Resolution rescinding and replacing Resolution No. 2024 -015 authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to submit the grant application and any other necessary documents to apply, accept and appropriate the grant in an amount up to $14 million;
(2) Find that applying for grant funds is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
(3) Find that applying for grant funds is categorically excluded, not subject to 24 CFR Section 58.5 and convert to exempt under the National Environmental Policy Act.

4.2(c). Authorize and approve the following actions related to the Downtown Redding Property Based Improvement District feasibility process:
(1) Award Request for Proposal s Schedule No. 5389, Downtown Redding Property Based Improvement District Formation to NBS Government Finance Group for $113,500;
(2) Authorize the City Mana ger, or designee, to execute the Consultant and Professional Services Contract with NBS Government Finance Group; (3) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 42 nd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023 -060 appropriating an additional $13,670 to fund the Consultant and Professional Services Contract; and (4) Find that entering into a Consultant and Professional Services Contract is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Redding City Council May 7, 2024

4.2(d). Approve and authorize the following:
(1) Approve a Lease Agreement with Aircraft Service Specialists for Executive Hangar No. 1 at the Redding Regional Airport for a five -year term, at $911 per month, adjusted annually based on the consumer price index, with the total five year estimated value o f the lease to be $56,000, assuming target inflation of two percent;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to sign and execute the agreement; and (3) Find that the action is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 1 5301 – Existing Facilities.

4.2(e). Adopt Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, on behalf of the City of Redding as the Administrative Entity for the NorCal Continuum of Care (CoC) to execute contracts or agreements, of any amount, approv ed by the CoC Executive Board; and authorize City of Redding Housing Division staff to administer, monitor and report on the respective contracts and/or agreements.

4.3(a). Authorize the City Manager to finalize contract negotiations and execute a three- year agreement with the Center for Internet Security, in an amount not to exceed $222,750, for endpoint security protection and 24x7x365 endpoint monitoring services for the City of Redding.

4.6(a). Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 41st Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $ 1,100,000 for the City of Redding (City) South City Park Revitalization Project funded by $300,000 from the City’s Park In-Lieu fund and $800,000 from the City’s Park Development fund.

4.6(b). Authorize the sole source and procurement of Mannington [Retroscope 83638] Tile Carpeting to enhance, upgrade, and match the flooring at the City of Redding City Hall within the specifications for Public Works projects as authorized by Public Contract Code Section 3400(c)(2).

4.9(a). Adopt Resolution proclaiming May 5 -6, 2024, as California Peace Officers' Memorial Day ; May 16, 2024, as Shasta County Peace Officers' Memorial Day; and May 12-18, 2024, as National Police Week in the City of Redding.

4.11(a). Accept Bid Schedule No. 5265 (Job No. 2644), Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Traffic Signal, awarded to Crosspoint General Engineering, as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $484,864.16.

Redding City Council May 7, 2024

4.11(b). Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Negotiation No. 5461, Old Alturas Road Improvement Project:
(1) Award to Lamb Unlimited General Engineering in the amount of $1,033,397.75;
(2) Approve an additional $ 168,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees;
(3) Approve $60,000 for project development costs;
(4) Approve $104,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (5) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000; and
(6) Find that the Project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section s 15301 - Existing Facilities, 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures.

4.11(c). Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Negotiation No. 5462 (Job No. 2680), Athens Area Water Improvements Project:
(1) Award to Eddie Axner Construction, Inc., in the amount of $4,694,746.24;
(2) Approve an addi tional $518,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees;
(3) Approve $340,000 for project development costs;
(4) Approve $470,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (5) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases i n either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $100,000; and
(6) Find that the Project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities, 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures.

4.11(d). Authorize the City Engineer to implement a Parking Fee Holiday from 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., on Friday, May 17, 2024, for the annual Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast held in Downtown Redding.

4.11(e). Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals No. 5 457, to provide engineering design services for the City of Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operations Project:
(1) Award the Consultant and Professional Services Contract to Water Works Engineers, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $1,199,280; (2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the contract with Water Works Engineers, LLC; and
(3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $100,000.

Redding City Council May 7, 2024

4.15(a). Adopt Resolution, effective May 12, 2024, approving an amendment to the Redding Independent Employees’ Organization - Clerical, Technical and Professional Unit Non -Exempt Schedule of Classifications and H ourly Wage Rates to add three new classifications for positions in the City of Redding ’s Financial Services Department: Account Clerk I – Finance; Account Clerk II – Finance; and Accounting Specialist – Finance.

RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT, ACKNOWLEDGE, ADOPT , APPROVE,
AND/OR AUTHORIZE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

9. REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

Mayor Tenessa Audette
9A. Consider the removal of Aaron Hatch from the Redding Planning Commission.

Recommendation:

Consider the removal of Aaron Hatch from the City of Redding Planning Commission.

City Manager

9.1(a). Consider letter in support of local control regarding the Fountain Wind Project in Shasta County.

Recommendation:

Authorize the Mayor to sign a letter to the California Energy Commission indicating the City of Redding’s support of local control regarding the proposed Fountain Wind Project in Shasta County.

Development Services

9.4(a). Consider report and status upda te regarding implementation of short -term rental regulations in the City of Redding (City).

Recommendation:

Accept report and p rovide direction to staff regarding implementation of the City’s Short-Term Rental Program as well as potential revisions to the City’s Short-Term Rental Ordinance.

Redding City Council May 7, 2024

Electric Utility

9.5(a). Consider City of Redding Electric Utility's 2024 Wildfire Mitigation Plan.

Recommendation:

Approve the City of Redding Electric Utility’s updated and revised 2024 Wildfire Mitigation Plan pursuant to California Senate Bill 901.

Police

9.9(b). Oral update by the Redding Police Department regarding Minor Tobacco Operations in the City of Redding.

Recommendation:

Informational only.

Public Works

9.11(f). Emergency Const ruction Contract to Repair and Replace Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street.

Recommendation:

Authorize the following actions relative to the Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failin g Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project (Project):
(1) Adopt Resolution, by not less than four -fifths affirmative vote, authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and award an emergency public works contract for the Project in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000;
(3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve construction contingency amounts up to a total of $300,000;
(4) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve construction management and inspection amounts up to a total of $175,000; and (5) Find that the Project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects.

11. COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
[A-050-060]

Information Only

Redding City Council May 7, 2024

12. SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS

FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

13. ADJOURNMENT

Pursuant to the Brown Act , non -confidential materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Office of the City Clerk, 3 rd Floor, City Hall, 777 Cypres s Avenue, Redding, California.

City Council Meetings will be televised live on Shasta Community Access Channels via Charter/Spectrum Cable channel 181 , and will be rerun on Thursday at 12:30 p.m. during the week in which the meeting is hel d. Additionally, the meeting can be viewed online at the following: https://www.shastaartscouncil.org/scactv. Video of the City Council meetings can also be viewed on the City’s web site at http://www.cityofredding.gov/. Open the Services tab, and select City Council Videos.

In compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the City of Redding will make available to persons with disabilities modifications or accommodatio ns including auxiliary aids or services necessary to participate in public meetings. A person needing assistance should contact the Redding City Clerk by telephone at (530) 225 -4447 or in person, or by mail at 777 Cypress Avenue, 3 rd Floor, Redding, Califo rnia 96001 at least three (3) working days in advance.

The City of Redding will ensure that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any of its projects, activities, services, or business opportunities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, as afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes as amended. All persons, regardless of their citizenship status, are cove red under this regulation.

Questions, complaints, or requests for accommodations or additional information may be forwarded to the ADA & Title VI Coordinator at 777 Cypress Avenue, Attn: Personnel Dept., Redding, California 96001, Phone (530) 225-4065.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Presentation by Rebecca Daricek, Site Direct or for Nation’s Finest, providing information relative to serving Veterans in the City of Redding.

Attachments
^Presentation
MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 2A
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 2A--Presentation by Nation's Finest.

Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 8

PROUDLY SERVING VETERANS IN

SHASTA, TRINITY, SISKIYOU, MODOC, PLUMAS,

TEHAMA, AND LASSEN COUNTIES
Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding

WHO WE ARE
Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding

OUR MISSION
At Nation’s Finest, our mission is to support
America’s military Veterans and their families
with a comprehensive approach to housing,
health, and employment that helps them
achieve self-sufficiency and reach their full
potential.

Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding
GUIDING VETERANS HOME SINCE 1972
Founded in 1972, Nation’s Finest has been supporting Veterans and their families for more than 50 years. Today, we operate 31+ locations in 15 mostly rural communities spanning California, Arizona, and Nevada.

The Nation’s Finest-Redding office provides essential supportive services to Veterans and their families in surrounding
communities.

Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding

LOCATIONS
NEVADA: 2
ARIZONA: 3CALIFORNIA: 10
Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding
While we tailor our services to the unique needs of each individual Veteran using a whole-person approach, our services generally fall under a few broad categories:

WHAT WE DO
Housing Assistance
Homelessness Prevention
Mental and Behavioral
Health Support
Employment Assistance
Case Management
Mobile Support
Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding

HOUSING SUPPORT
Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding
• Rental Assistance
• Utility Assistance
• Security/Utility Deposits
• Moving Costs
• General Housing Stability
Assistance
• Childcare Costs
• Transportation Repairs

HOUSING SUPPORT
• Emergency Housing Assistance
• Rapid Resolution Targeted
Assistance
• Shallow Subsidy Assistance
• Tenant Incentives
• Health Care Navigation
• Legal services
Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding

PARK MARINA HOUSE
Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding
• Located in the Garden Tract neighborhood of Redding California • Transitional living facility for male Veterans in recovery from substance abuse
• Offers a low barrier bridge between homelessness and
permanent housing
• Affordable rent with grant beds offered through Nick Dahl Memorial Veterans Fund for Shasta County Veterans

PARK MARINA HOUSE IN REDDING
Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding

CASE MANAGEMENT
Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding

CASE MANAGEMENT
• Tailored approach to financial assistance, necessary
referrals, coaching, and VA needs (ex: HUD-VASH)
• Weekly minimum contact between the Veteran and their
case manager
• Development and follow-up of a treatment plan
• Utilization of a housing locator case manager in addition to a regular case manager
Case management at Nation’s Finest
is a TEAM EFFORT!
Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding

MOBILE SERVICE UNITS
Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding
Our MSU enables the Redding office to:

MOBILE SERVICE UNITS (MSUs)
• Serve 7 rural counties in Northern Nevada, ranging from California to the Oregon Border and from Willow Creek to the Nevada border
• Connect 1:1 with Veterans in the field, supplying them with critical resources
• Conduct intakes and enrollments
• Connect Veterans to essential services
Packet Pg. 22
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding

OUR IMPACT
In 2023, Nation’s Finest...
• Invested $1.2M+ into affordable housing for Veterans facing homeless or at-risk of homelessness
• Provided $11.2M+ in temporary financial assistance
• Provided 123,714 meals and 41,238 bed nights
• Stabilized 2,678 Veterans and family members through the VA’s SSVF Program
• Provided 3.6K+ clinical mental health counseling hours • Secured 250+ jobs for Veterans
View our Impact Report: www.NationsFinest.org/Our-Financials Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding
To say that I am grateful for the
time and effort they have shown
me would be a huge
understatement. I was not
looking for a handout, but a hand
up. Nation’s Finest has restored
my faith in humanity.

DeeAundra
Marine Corps Veteran
Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding
When my fellow comrades saw
what happened to me, it gave
them great confidence and trust
in Nation’s Finest that it could
happen the same for them. I’m
so grateful for everyone at
Nation’s Finest, but especially my
case management who went
above and beyond to help me get
independent housing.

Yvonne
US Veteran
Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding
Packet Pg. 26
Attachment: ^Presentation (2A--Presentation regarding

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve Minutes: Special Meeting – City of Re dding General Plan of March 26 , 2024 ; and Special Meeting of April 1, 2024.

Attachments
^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting of March 26, 2024 ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting - Closed Session of April 1, 2024 - Adjournment MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes.

Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 27
345
03/26/2024
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
March 26, 2024, 5:30 PM

The meeting was called to order at 5:38 p.m. by Mayor Tenessa Audette with the following Council Members present: Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter. Michael Dacquisto participated telephonically. All votes were taken by roll call.

Also present: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade , City Attorney Christian M. Curtis, City Clerk Sharlene Tipton, and Assistant City Clerk Anette Cates.

The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Audette.

PUBLIC HEARING

2.1 Public Hearing - two resolutions regarding the comprehensive update of the City of Redding General Plan 2045 (Plan) and Final Environmental Impact Report.

Development Services Director Jeremy Pagan and retired annuitant/Planning Manager Kent Manual summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), and provided a PowerPoint presentation, both incorporated herein by reference.

City Attorney Curtis provided a brief explanation related to “Mandatory” versus “Flexible” policy language used in the Plan and how part of the philosophy is to be more transparent as to what the Plan is or is not intended to do to decrease opportunities for insincere opposition to future projects.

The hour of 6:54 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Audette opened the Public Hearing.

The Affidavit of Publication – Notice of Public Hearing is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Sarah Risher opined the need for mandatory language and strong policy direction to be included within the Plan.

David Backues encouraged the Council to consider an amendment to include the areas up into the Bear Mountain Road area.

Susan Murray expressed her concerns regarding emergency/evacuation plans should there be a railroad/transit incident within the City of Redding involving hazardous materials.

Holly Duffy shared her concerns with climate change and lack of a climate change action plan included in the Plan.

Frank Ryan opposed a road/trail through his neighborhood, and provided the Council with a letter written by his son describing his childhood growing up in the Jenny Creek area, incorporated herein by reference.

Marcia McGetrick-West spoke on behalf of the Friends of Jenny Creek, stating that their Attorney provided a letter to the Council noting mis-mapping of the Jenny Creek Trail by the Community Services Department in its Open Parks and Trails document, and requested that the Jenny Creek Paved Trail be corrected and the northern Jenny Creek Trail be removed from the updated Plan to avoid confusion.

Don D. Davis, Realtor with Re -Max five stars, provided a map to Council, incorporated herein by reference, and requested an amendment to the Plan be made to include the Tierra Oaks subdivision in the northeast quadrant of the City of Redding.

Margy Cantrell asked for this item to be delayed until the next Council meeting and noted that she would like a guarantee that any City of Redding -owned surplus property near the Turtle Bay/Park Marina area not be sold or be included in the Plan.

Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting of March 26, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 346
03/26/2024

David Ledger, Shasta Environmental Alliance, opined the need for mandatory language and strong policy direction to be included within the Plan.

Rebeca Ladron de Guerara, President of the Shasta Birding Society, formerly known as the Wintu Audubon Society, noted there are several changes they would like incorporated within the Environmental Impact Report and noted that their Attorney sent a 10-page letter the previous week to Council outlining their concerns.

Jason Madruga supported new development and encouraged installing low maintenance sidewalks along Quartz Hill Road and anywhere in the City to keep it walkable and to encourage citizens to be active outside.

Sheryl Bullock stated that a bridge over the Sacramento River at Buenaventura has been discussed amongst neighbors, and asked that it be included in the Plan to assist with additional emergency access.

Erin Resner opined the need for mandatory language and strong policy direction to be included within the Plan to replace the word “should” with “shall” within the Plan.

Rachel Hatch encouraged the Council to look at emphasis on creating/implementing a Climate Action and Resilience Change Plan through a community engaged process ; and opined the need for mandatory language to be included within the Plan.

Allen Knott supported adoption of the Plan with the goal in mind of being able to provide the necessary workforce housing.

Mayor Audette determined that no one else present wished to address the matter and closed the public hearing at 7:33 p.m.

In response to some of the public comments made, City Manager Tippin noted that the northeastern portion of the City is served by the Bella Vista Water District, and has limited resources to provide for additional development.

In re sponse to Vice Mayor Winter noting that the Plan is 78 percent declarative, Mr.

Manuel opined that this new Plan is approximately five to 10 percent more declarative than the existing Plan.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

**Clerk’s Note: Council Member Munns left the room at 8:34 p.m. and returned at 8:36 p.m.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Dacquisto, seconded by Council Member Mezzano, to: (1) adopt a Resolution: (a) certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report; (b) approving and adopting the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations; and (c) approving and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Program; (2) adopt a Resolution approving the City of Redding General Plan 2045 and repealing the City’s 2000-2020 General Plan; and (3) include all of the property boundaries previously included that were removed by staff.

The Vote by Roll Call:

AYES: Council Members – Dacquisto and Mezzano
NOES: Council Members – Munns, Winter, and Audette
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None

Motion failed.

Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting of March 26, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 347

03/26/2024
A SECOND MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, seconded by Council Member Munns, to: (1) adopt Resolution No. 2024-026, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding: (a) certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report; (b) approving and adopting the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations ; and (c) approving and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring Program; and (2) adopt Resolution No. 2024-027, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding approving the City of Redding General Plan 2045 and repealing the City’s 2000 -2020 General Plan with the following changes: (a) replacement of the first sentence on page 5 of the Community Health, Wellness, and Environmental Justice element as well as part of the second sentence as follows: “As used in this element, the terms environmental justice and disadvantaged community have the same meaning as in Government Code Section 65302(h). This element addresses the equitable distribution of environmental risks and benefits across a community and implements the intent of CGC Section 65302 by….”; and (b) modification of Economic Development Element Goal ED3 and add Policy ED3G as follows: “Goal ED3 - Attract, promote, and retain manufacturing/primary industry growth”; “Policy ED3G – Prioritize and incentivize innovative industries and products that have a demonstrated job and economic multiplier effect on local economies; encourage those industries and ma nufacturers to source local goods and services for their products to increase the velocity and amount of the multiplier effect on the local economy.” The Vote by Roll Call:

AYES: Council Members – Munns, Winter, and Audette
NOES: Council Members – Dacquisto and Mezzano
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None

Resolution Nos. 2024-026 and 2024-027 are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at the hour of 8:41 p.m., Mayor Audette declared the m eeting adjourned.

APPROVED:

_______________________________
Tenessa Audette, Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting of March 26, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 348
04/01/2024
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
April 1, 2024, 5:30 PM

The meeting was called to order by Mayor Tenessa Audette with the following Council Members present: Mark Mezzano, Michael Dacquisto, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter.

Also present: City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Attorney Christian M. Curtis, Assistant City Clerk Anette Cates, and Executive Assistant Erin Barnhart.

CLOSED SESSION

At the hour of 5: 30 p.m., Mayor Audette opened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.

At the hour of 5:45 p.m., Mayor Audette reconvened the Closed Session to Open Session and reported that in reference to:

3A. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4):

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of Litigation
One potential case

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

REGULAR CALENDAR: R EPORTS & COMMUNICATI ONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

4.11(a).Termination of Contract with Jason Abel Construction, Inc. and Potential Findings of Fact to consider terminating the Public Works Agreement ("Agreement") dated March 15, 2022, between the City of Redding and Jason Abel Construction, Inc. ("Contractor") with respect to the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements Project, Phase 1, Bid Schedule 5263, Job No. 2629 ("Project") for the Contractor's default.

The Report to City Council (staff report), is incorporated herein by reference. No presentation by staff was made.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Dacquisto, seconded by Council Member Munns, to issue an Order of Adjournment and to reconvene as a special meeting on Tuesday, April 2, 2024, at 5:15 p.m. in the City Council Chambers to consider agenda item

4.11(a) and no other agenda item. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at the hour of 5:46 p.m., Mayor Audette declared the m eeting adjourned to reconvene on Tuesday, April 2, 2024, at 5:20 p.m.

APPROVED:

_______________________________
Tenessa Audette, Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Anette Cates, Assistant City Clerk
Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting - Closed Session of April 1, 2024 - Adjournment (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 40th Amendment to City of Redding (City) Budget Resolution No. 2023 -060 re-appropriating the City’s Airport Division funds in the amount of $50,000 from the groundwater monitoring wel l account to engineering and design services to fund the City Public Wo rks’ Engineering Division staff to design the reconstruction of the Redding Regional Airport public parking lot.

Fiscal Impact

This action will not create any additional fiscal impact. T he resulting Redding Regional Airport (RDD) capital improvement project is estimated to cost $500,000 - the funding proposal for the improvements will be brought back to the City Council (Council) in June 2024 for consideration.

Alternative Action

Council may choose not to adopt the budget resolution and provide alt ernative direction on funding the public parking lot improvement project.

Background/Analysis

RDD’s passenger enplanements for the previous three years show significant increases reflecting the impact of new passenger air service routes through the RDD, specifically with new destinations such as Seattle and Burbank. Growth at the RDD i ncreases the wear and tear on facilities, particularly passenger facilities such as the main, paid public parking lot at the terminal. The public parking facilities have degraded significantly and risk creating hazards for users of the parking lot.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.2(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(a)-- Budget Amendment - Airports
Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 32
Report to Redding City Council April 30, 2024
Re: 4.2(a)--Budget Amendment - City of Redding Airports Division Page 2

In response to functionality and appearance issues related to the main parking lot, the Airports Division is seeking to re -appropriate a portion of its operating budget to fu nd initial design and engineering costs associated with the design of the parking lot improvements. T he engineering design will be managed internally by the City of Redding ’s Public Works Department who have estimated $50,000 to design the project. Ultimat ely, this project will return to Council in June 2024 for approval of financing the improvements and the bids/awards related to construction of the improvements.

Environmental Review

This activity is not a project as defined by the California Environmen tal Quality Act or the National Environmental Policy Act. No further action is required at this time.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10 -year Financial Plans for all funds.”

Attachments
^Resolution
Packet Pg. 33
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 40TH AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060
APPROPRIATING $0 IN FUNDING FOR THE PASSENGER TERMINAL PUBLIC PARKING PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-2024

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
201

7101 Redding Regional Airport

$0

THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase (Decrease) Expenditures
201-7101-5037551-00000 PFAS Monitoring (50,000)$
201-7101-7200004-00000 On Property Paving 50,000$
Total -$ -$

THAT the purpose is to appropriate $0 in funding for the Passenger Terminal Public Parking Project for the fiscal year 2023-2024.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of May, 2024, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.2(a)--Budget Amendment - City of Redding Airports Division)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve the following actions relat ive to the State of California’s Housing and Community Development’s Community Development Block Grant -Disaster Recovery Workforce Development Program grant application:
(1) Adopt Resolution rescinding and replacing Resolution No. 2024 -015 authorizing the City Manager , or designee , to submit the grant application and any other necessary documents to apply, accept and appropriate the grant in an amount up to $14 million; (2) Find that applying for grant funds is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
(3) Find that applying for grant funds is categorically excluded , not subject to 24 CFR Section 58.5 and convert to exempt under the National Environmental Policy Act.

Fiscal Impact

Community Development Block Grant Disaster Recovery Workforce Development Program funds are grant funds with no match obligation. Awarded funds will pass through the Cit y of Redding (City) to Califo rnia Heritage Youth Build (CHYBA) to complete various workforce projects. City staff time will be paid through the grant’s activity delivery allocation . There is no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could decline to authorize submission of the application with increased funding request, thereby prohibiting the City’s ability to partner with CHYBA for this one-time grant funding opportunity for the community.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.2(b)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(b)--Approval to apply for additional State of California Housing & Community Development CDBG-DR Workforce Development Program Funding.

Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 35
Report to Redding City Council April 30, 2024
Re: 4.2(b)--CDBG-DR Workforce Development Grant Funding Page 2

Background/Analysis

On February 20, 2024, Council approved the submittal of this grant application in an amount up to $6,096,458. California State Housing and Community Development staff have informed City staff that there are leftover funds from other jurisdictions that may be able to supplement the City and CHYBA’s application for funding . Therefore, it is necessary to rescind the previously approved Resolution 2024 -015 and approve a new resolution with the correct grant application amount of up to $14 million.

The additional Workforce Development grant funds will be used by CHYBA to lease workforce facilities for a total of 15 years up from the original 5-year projection; and toward workforce development, support services, and City grant administration and reporting.

Environmental Review

Based on the f acts of the record, applying for grants is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Furthermore, applying for grants is categorically excluded not subject to 58.5 and converts to exempt under N ational Environmental Pr otection Agency (NEPA) . Upon the award of grant funds and prior to the commencement of project activities, separate CEQA and NEPA environmental review s will be completed before any choice limiting actions occur.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century - “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

• Economic Development- “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”

Attachments
^Resolution CDBG-DR Workforce Development
Resolution No. 2024-015 (to be rescinded)
Staff Report From the February 20, 2024, City Council Meeting Packet Pg. 36
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 2024 -015 AND APPROVING AN

APPLICATION FOR FUNDING AND THE EXECUTION OF A GRANT
AGREEMENT AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO FROM THE 2023-
2024 FUNDING YEAR OF THE STATE CDBG -DR RECOVERY

WORKFORCE PROGRAM

BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

Section 1:

Resolution No. 2024-015 is hereby rescinded.

Section 2:

The City Council has reviewed and hereby approves the submission to the State of California of one or more application(s) in the aggregate amount, not to exceed, $14,000,000 for the following CDBG-DR activities, pursuant to the March 2023 CDBG-DR NOFA:

Activity Dollar Amount Being Request for the Activity
Preliminary Activities $85,000
Workforce Development $3,640,915
Supportive Services $1,597,000
Facilities $6,450,000
Grant administration and Reporting $1,454,556

Section 3:

The City Council acknowledges compliance with all state and federal public participation requirements in the development of its application(s).

Section 4:

The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to execute and deliver all applications and act on the City Council’s behalf in all matters pertaining to all such applications.

Section 5:

If an application is approved, the City Manager is authorized to enter into, execute and deliver the grant agreement (i.e., Standard Agreement) and any and all subsequent amendments thereto with the State of California for the purposes of the grant.

Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: ^Resolution CDBG-DR Workforce Development (4.2(b)--CDBG-DR Workforce Development Grant Funding) Section 6:

If an application is approved, the City Manager is authorized to sign and submit Funds Requests and all required reporting forms and other documentation as may be required by the State of California from time to time in connection with the grant.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of May, 2024, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

___________________________________
TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:

___________________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
City of Redding

I, Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk of the City of Redding, State of California, hereby certify the above and foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of a resolution adopted at a duly noticed and convened meeting of said City Council on May 7, 2024, and that such resolutio n has not been amended, modified, repealed or rescinded since its date of adoption and is in full force and effect as of the date hereof.

__________________________________________
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk of the City of Redding,
State of California

Packet Pg. 38
Attachment: ^Resolution CDBG-DR Workforce Development (4.2(b)--CDBG-DR Workforce Development Grant Funding) RESOLUTION NO. 2024- 015

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING AND THE EXECUTION

OF A GRANT AGREEMENT AND ANY AMENDMENTS THERETO
FROM THE 2023- 2024 FUNDING YEAR OF THE STATE CDBG- DR

RECOVERY WORKFORCE PROGRAM
BE IT RESOLVED by theCity Councilof theCity of Reddingasfollows:

Section 1:

The City Council has reviewed and hereby approvesthe submissionto the Stateof California of oneor moreapplication(s) in theaggregateamount, notto exceed, of $6,096,458for thefollowing CDBG- DR activities, pursuant to the March 2023 CDBG- DR NOFA:

Activity Dollar Amount Being Requestfor theActivity
Preliminary Activities 121, 000
Workforce Development 2, 428, 420
Supportive Services 612, 738
Facilities 2, 384, 300
Grant administration and Reporting 550, 000
Section 2•
The City Council acknowledges compliance with all state and federal public participation requirements in the development of its application( s).

Section 3•
The City Council hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager, or designee, to executeand deliverall applicationsandact on the City Council's behalfin all matterspertainingto all such applications.

Section 4•
If an application is approved, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to enter into, execute and deliver the grant agreement ( i. e., Standard Agreement) and any and all subsequent amendments thereto with the State of California for the purposes of the grant.

Section 5:

If an application is approved, the City Manager, or designee, is authorized to sign and submit FundsRequestsandall requiredreportingformsandotherdocumentationasmayberequiredby the State of California from time to time in connection with the grant.

Packet Pg. 39
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-015 (to be rescinded) (4.2(b)--CDBG-DR Workforce Development Grant Funding) I HEREBYCERTIFYthattheforegoingresolutionwasintroducedataregularmeetingof the CityCouncilof theCityof Reddingonthe20thdayof February, 2024, andwasdulyadoptedat said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: - Dacquisto, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Audette NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: - None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: - None
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: - None
ATTEST:

I ",
SHARLE, T-E TIPTON, City Clerk

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
City of Redding
4z
SSA AUDET Mayor
id Za
CHRISTIANM. CURTIS, City Attorney
1, SharleneTipton, CityClerkoftheCityofRedding, Stateof California, herebycertifytheabove andforegoingto bea full, trueandcorrectcopyof aresolutionadoptedata dulynoticedand convened meeting of said City Council on February 20, 2024, and that such resolution has not been amended, modified, repealedor rescinded since its date of adoption and is in full force and effect as of the date hereof.

SharleneTipton, CityClerk6f theCityof Redding,
State of California
Packet Pg. 40
Attachment: Resolution No. 2024-015 (to be rescinded) (4.2(b)--CDBG-DR Workforce Development Grant Funding)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve the following actions relative to the State of California’s Housing and Community Development’s Community Development Block Grant - Disaster Recovery Workforce Development Program grant application:
(1) Adopt Resolution authorizing the City Manager or designee to submit the grant application and any other necessary documents to apply, accept and appropriate the grant in the amount $6,096,458;
(2) Find that applying for grant funds is not cons idered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
(3) Find that applying for grant funds is categorically excluded, not subject to 58.5 and convert to exempt under the National Environmental Policy Act.

Fiscal Impact

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Disaster Recovery ( DR) Workforce Development Program funds are grant funds with no match obligation. Any awarded funds will pass through the City of Redding (City) to California Heritage Youth Build (CHYBA) to complete various workf orce projects. City staff time will be paid through the grant’s activity delivery allocation in an estimated amount of $222,000. There is no impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action

The City Council could decline to authorize submission of the application, thereby prohibiting the City’s ability to partner with CHYBA for this one -time grant funding opportunity for the community.

MEETING DATE: February 20, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.2(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(a)--Approval to apply for State of California Housing & Community Development CDBG-DR Workforce Development Program Funding.

Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: Staff Report From the February 20, 2024, City Council Meeting (4.2(b)--CDBG-DR Workforce Development Grant Funding) Report to Redding City Council February 14, 2024
Re: 4.2(a)--CDBG-DR Workforce Grant Funding Page 2

Background/Analysis

On August 4, 2018, the Federal Emergency Management Agency published DR -4382, the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of California (State) in response to the devastating wildfires in Shasta and Lake Counties. During that same year, a separate disaster, DR-4407, was published for Butte, Los Angeles and Ventura Counties.

As part of the ongoing effort to assist the State with recovery from these disasters, the federal government, through the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development awarded CDBG - DR funds to the State. These funds are being administered through the State’s Housing and Community Development Department (HCD) to assist those counties covered by DR -4382 and DR-4407. HCD undertook an extensive needs assessment to determine the specific recovery priorities for each of the affected counties. The resulting unmet re covery needs were categorized into four program areas: housing, infrastructure, economic revitalization, and planning.

As per the 2018 CDBG -DR Action Plan, HCD allocated $40,694,942 of the CDBG -DR funding to create the DR -Workforce Development Program . DR-Workforce Development projects are funded to assist with meeting the unmet workforce needs of affected communities and to address economic revitalization . Of these funds, the Shasta County region is allocated a maximum of $6,096,458 to be divided between successful applicants and projects.

This grant will provide workforce training to Shasta County through CHYBA to be used towards workforce development activities including categories such as construction trades, healthcare, emergency response, and culina ry training. Additionally, they will refer clients to other workforce providers including the Shasta Builders’ Exchange, the Smart Center, and Shasta College. CHYBA will assist participants with supportive services to help trainees successfully access and participate in the workforce training program and support gainful employment. City staff will use their grant experience to apply for the grant, request payment draws and generally oversee the grant activities undertaken by CHYBA . City staff time will be p aid by activity delivery from the DR-Workforce Development grant.

Should the application be awarded b y HCD, upon Council approval and pursuant to the subject Resolution the City Manager would be authorized to enter into a grant agreement with HCD.

Environmental Review

Based on the facts of the record, applying for grants is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Furthermore, applying for grants is categorically excluded not subject to 58.5 and converts to exempt under N ational Environmental Protection Agency (NEPA). Upon the award of grant funds and prior to the commencement of project activities, separate CEQA and NEPA environmental review s will be completed before any choice limiting actions occur.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century - “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development- “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”

Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: Staff Report From the February 20, 2024, City Council Meeting (4.2(b)--CDBG-DR Workforce Development Grant Funding) Report to Redding City Council February 14, 2024
Re: 4.2(a)--CDBG-DR Workforce Grant Funding Page 3

Attachments
^Resolution
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Staff Report From the February 20, 2024, City Council Meeting (4.2(b)--CDBG-DR Workforce Development Grant Funding)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize and a pprove the following actions related to the Downtown Redding Property Based Improvement District feasibility process:
(1) Award Request for Proposal s Schedule No. 5389, Downtown Redding Property Based Improvement District Formation to NBS Government Finance Group for $113,500; (2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the Consultant and Professional Services Contract with NBS Government Finance Group;
(3) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 42nd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating an additional $13,670 to fund the Consultant and Professional Services Contract; and
(4) Find that entering into a Consultant and Professional Services Contract is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Fiscal Impact

The costs associated with the Request for Proposals No. 5389 (RFP) will be funded by the General Fund. In March 2022 , City C ouncil (Council) approved $100,000 with a budget resolution toward Downtown landscape maintenance and Property Based Improvement District research/feasibility efforts. Additionally, at that time , Council indicated intent to allocate an additional $100,000 during the budget development process for FY 2023 -24. During the budget development process this was still in the evaluation stage and the additional $100,000 was n ot allocated instead waiting until the process was finalized. Upon completion of the RFP the awarded bid is $113,500, which requires additional funding of $13,670.

Alternative Action

The Council could choose to not to award the R FP and provide staff with an alternative direction.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.2(c)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389, Downtown Redding Property Based Improvement District Formation
Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 44
Report to Redding City Council May 1, 2024
Re: 4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389 Page 2

Background/Analysis

On May 18, 2021, the Council received a report from staff regarding the progress on forming the Downtown Property Owner Assessment District ( Assessment District ). As a result, Council directed staff to host and coordinate an “Assessment District Workshop” through a qualified consultant - as such, staff secured Civitas, an assessment district consultant. In June 2021, Civitas facilitated two assessment district workshops. As intended, the workshops provided attendees information about what an assessment district is ; reviewed district case studies; discussed the steps to formation ; and the associated timelines. In additi on, staff gathered feedback from the attendees regarding their support or non -support of forming a new assessment district. Twenty-five people attended the workshops. Attendees consisted of commercial or mixed-use property owners and businesses . The participants represented a variety of businesses and/or tenants that included office, retail, restaurants, government, commercial and non-profits.

In addition to the work of Civitas, staff prepared district mapping, provided an assessment analysis, and a cost estimate of conceptual services, based on the downtown core area of 37 properties. In follow -up to the initial w orkshops, staff also conducted an online survey. The survey asked questions related to the type s of services and improvements needed within the proposed Assessment District. A total of 18 out of 22 respondents supported the Assessment District and 13 participants stated that they would be interested in being placed on a stakeholder group to assist in the Assessment District analysis/feasibility process.

In September 2021, staff held a meeting with the 13 survey participants ; topics included survey results, sample management district plans, potential district boundaries and potential services to be provided. The group identified the top five servic e categories to be provided within the proposed Assessment District that included landscape maintenance, including the new City park known as Whistle Stop Park ; security; street light ing improvements; litter and trash abatement; and general cleaning/power washing.

On March 1, 2022, staff emailed the 37 property owners within the Assessment District boundaries a copy of the proposed Assessment District map, service estimate, and conceptual assessment range grid. The email also requested that each of the st akeholders provide their preference on whether to move forward and explore the Assessment District as a Property Based Improvement District (PBID) . Staff received responses from 25 of the 37 property owners; of which 19 stated “yes” to moving forward and e xploring a PBID. As such, a PBID stakeholder’s group lead the way and created an RFP for a PBID consultant.

On June 3, 2023, the RFP was published and garnered two responses: (1) NBS and (2) New City America. A rating and ranking committee was assembled from members of the stakeholder group and the committee evaluated the proposals based on a number of technical merit and fee schedule criteria. After careful consideration, the committee unanimously selected NBS as the recommended consultant. In addition, on April 5, 2024, a stakeholder meeting was held to recap the PBID process, provide an update on the consultant procurement process and have an open discussion about the future of the PBID. Following the meeting, staff conducted another online survey where in 12 of 15 respondents continue to support the formation of the PBID.

As proposed, NBS will complete the scope of work in three phases; Phase I, the initial assessment of creating the PBID (meetings, site assessment, preliminary benefits assessment, needs checklist and general project timeline; Phase II includes the analytical work, PBID scope of services, budget development, confirmation of properties to be assessed, and quantification of general and special benefits; Phase III includes the legal steps to actually establish the PBID (ordinances, management plan, engineer’s report, and petition/ballot).

Packet Pg. 45
Report to Redding City Council May 1, 2024
Re: 4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389 Page 3

Environmental Review

Entering into a Consultant Contract for this activity is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”

• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs , retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”

Attachments
^Resolution
^Downtown Assessment District Map
NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement
Staff Report From September 15, 2020, City Council M eeting - Disestablishment of the Midtown Mall Project No. 1, Benefit Assessment District No. 1993-1 Staff Report From May 18, 2021, City Council Meeting - Consider the Redding Downtown Assessment District Update and Provide Direction
Packet Pg. 46
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 42ND AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060
APPROPRIATING $13,670 FOR CONTRACT TO COMPLETE THE DOWNTOWN

REDDING PROPERTY BASED IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FOR FISCA L YEAR 2023-24

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
101 1099 Non-Departmental $13,670

THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase (Decrease) Revenue
101-1099-2910000-00000 Fund Balance 13,670
Increase (Decrease) Expenditures
101-1099-6711021-00000 Designated Expenses 13,670$
Total 13,670$ 13,670$

THAT the purpose is to appropriate $13,670 for contract to complete the Downtown Redding Property Based Improvement District for fiscal year 2023-24.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of May, 2024, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389) ¦1
Fire
Station
Shasta
Regional
Medical
Center
1747
1530
1351
2065
1405
1475
14011341
178617881776
173417401746
17641766
17501760
177417841780
1128
1937
2004
2027
1650
1627
1702
14381410
1551 1700
1712
10231015
1620
1646
1708
1616
17251737
1190
1140
1080 1052
1040
1044
1854
1864
1870
1812
955
1910
1800
1327
1702
1303 1201
1235
1232
1319
1733
1724
1790
1759
1027
1011
13241326 1325
1335
13001313
1264
1100
1347
1400
1240
1429
1535
1720
1720
1388
1424
1300 1301
1115 1055
1045
1035
1272
1365 1336
1595
1426
1318
1358 1340
1614
17451755
1757
1718
1647
1037
1575
1725
1755
19051213
1580
1775
1205
1204
2050
1954
20012054
2042
2030
1401
1428
1427
1459
2035
2010
1433
1600
1309
1333
1341
1433
1451
1280
1302
1314
1320
1547
1270
1645165516651308
1638
1350
1567 - 1501
1590 1661
1770
1400
1530
1550
1443
1420
2036 2038
2024
2010
1909
1925
1935
1130
1324
1336
1340
1422
1452
1738
1605
1245
1405 1743 1400
1522
15361525
1535
1505
1769 1737
155517561738
1600
1548
1524
1441
1439
1350
1452
1450
1255 1223
1448
1613
1400
1605
1647
1410
1322
1345 1307
1490
1407
1447A-C
1279
1211
1124
1250
1123
11331203
1802
1729
18101527
14551920
1701
1430-1436
1177
1204
1630
1636
1644-1650
11511620
1707 1700
1675 1238
1626
1625
1255
1321
1537 1554
1629
1620
1225
1770
1615
1619
1421
1439 1477
1656165016301622
1620
1700
1726
1722 1720
174917431739
1757
1242
1721
13051335
1229
12121222
1449
1459
1600
1600
1401
1445 1504
1506
1522
1532
1542
1560
1371
1530
1500
1641
1376 1346
1552
1556
1701
1643
1795
1409
1212
1555
1500
1402
12361455 1454
1510
1515
160016181610
1506
1516
1518
1322
14001424
1525
1440
14001327
1640
1630160013521726
1305
1317
17521736
1840
1836
1060
1130
1120
1099108910791067
1055
1045
1035
1021
1028
10011607 1003
1035
1756
1034
1002
1621
1620
2037
1810
1024
1005
1031
12611241
1220
1242
1252
1264
1251
16501630
1282
1113
1540
1110
1232
1560
1740
1200
1313
1260
1283
1322
1126
1134
1240
1250
1229
1245
1241
1261
1325 1200
1289 1260
1313
1140
1125
1753 1731
17361730
17331723
1790
1727
1700
1617
1637
1626
140014261438
1210
1445
1229
1227
12201239
1243
1270
1244
1263
1273
1250
1290
1345
1156
1130
1051
10351205
1255
10211107
1231
1105
1244
1230
1246
1264
1115
1267
1255
1225
1304
1355
1177
1220 1110
1134
1332
1342
1325
1205
1235
1330
1259
1282
1507
1242
1525
1335
1138
1350
1359 1220 1128
1150
1158
1135
1450
1441
1332
1310
193919371934
14431457
1796 1777
1767
1731
1042
2008
2022
2010
1730
1950
1823
1225
1909
1935
1943
1957
1965
1315
1933
1921
1991
150720181565
19331929
1950
2048
20302024
1921
2032
2007
2021
2037
2055 2039
2035
2006 11352005
1955
1825
1414
1618
2036
2010
2102
1005
985
965
2024
1092
1000960
950
965
940
1955
2025
1126
1110
1040
1030
1020
1010
1125
1025
10151060
1050
10401030
1020
2088
2020
2092
2018
20322034
1005
2022
1845
2108
19031901
16101606
1612
1545
1935
1923
1913
1749
1950
1932
1900 1705171517271735
17301760
1823
1819
1817
1754 1755
1824
1742 1733
1759
1755
2005
2105
2025
2118
16151803
1739
1721
1742
1716
17151755 1737
2020
2100
1930
1725
1807
1725
1624
1900
2024
2032
2036
2039
1443
1412
1441
2085
1235
1220
1708
1731
1150
1274
181418181824
1730
1690
1200
2044
2032
2026
1933
18161818
1740
1256
1425
1805
1257
1261
1438
1299
1808
1726
1740
1751
16221620
18201822 1824
1013
1042
10501054
1044
1052
2007
1725
1652
1698
1642
1670
1636
14111419
1615
1373 1313
1437
1338
1420 1414
1420
1501
1551
1334
1325
1557
13231337
13091315
1054
1440
20412032
2040
1525
1515 1431
1429
1237
1254
1800
1328
1440
14091411141314171419141514211427142914311435
14141416
1330
1328
133413401344134613481354
16041612160816161620162416281632
1470
123412521254
131513171325
112011241128113611441152
12071215121712191221
131613201328 12081206121012201224
100-203
1625
1302130413061308
1326
1624
1515
1754 173017381740174817601418141614201422
1640
14161418
1544
15361538
1524
151015161518
1435
14301440
1655
1641
135013401330
1380
13501360
1155
1415
1423
17231721171317071705
126212661268
1451
1495
1501
1555
1595
AB-1 B-2C-1 C-2
1575
1585
Court St
South St
South St
East St
Shasta St
Liberty St
Eureka Way
Market St
California St
Tehama St
Shasta St
Market St
Continental St
Oregon St
California St
Liberty St
Tehama St
East St
Am
elia Ct
Placer St Placer St
Division St
Waldon St
Sacramento St
Sacramento St
Center St
Gold St
Butte St
Lincoln St
Shasta St
Sacramento St
Butte St
Center St
Gold St
Market St
Yuba St
Liberty St
Yuba St
East St
Court St
Court St
Pine St
Pine St
Pine St
Market St
Promenade
RABA
Downtown
Transit
Center
Amtrak
Proposed Downtown Redding Property Based Improvement District City of Redding
Print Date: 6/22/2023
0 250 500125
Feet
±
Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: ^Downtown Assessment District Map (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 1 Rev. 6/15

CITY OF REDDING

CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT

THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding (“City”), a municipal corporation, and NBS Government Finance Group (“Consultant”) for the purpose of Down Town PBID formation.

WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.

NOW, THEREFORE , the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:

SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES

Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.

SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS

A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed One Hundred Thirteen Thousand Five Hundred Dollars ($113,500). This sum includes all out -of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be itemized to reflect the employees performing the requested tasks, the billing rate for each employee and the hours worked.

C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.

SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION

A. Consultant shall commence work on or about Ma y 10, 2024 and complete said work no later than April 1, 2025. Time is of the essence.

B. If Consultant fails to perform its duties to the satisfaction of City, or if consultant fails to fulfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Contract, then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon City giving written notice thereof to Consultant.

Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 2 Rev. 6/15
C. Either Party may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the term set forth in Section 3.A. of this Contract exceeds ninety (90) calendar days in duration, Consultant’s sole right to terminate shall be limited to termination for cause.

D. Consultant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City’s funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the project and/or work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of its intention to terminate. In the event of a termina tion pursuant to this subdivision, Consultant shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.

E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property ri ghts, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.

F. In the event that City terminates the Contract, City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered by Consultant p ursuant to this Contract; provided, however, that City shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits which might have been made by Consultant had Consultant completed the services required by this Contract. Consultant shall, not later than ten (10) c alendar days after termination of this Contract by City, furnish to City such financial information as in the judgment of the City’s representative is necessary to determine the reasonable value of the services rendered by Consultant.

G. In no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party’s failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.

SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT

A. City shall make its facilities accessible to Consultant as required for Consultant’s performance of its services under this Contract, and, upon request of Consultant, provide labor and safety equipment as required by Consultant for such access.

B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.

C. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 3 Rev. 6/15
Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Contract any licenses, permits and approvals that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.

D. Consultant shall, during the entir e term of this Contract, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Contract is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/employee relationship, association, joint venture relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs under this Contract. Any and all taxes imposed on Consultant’s income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Contract or its performance, including but not limited to sales or use taxes, shall be paid by Consultant. Consultant shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Consultant is an employee of City. Consultant shall not be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.

E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.

F. No portion of the work or services to be performed under this Contract shall be assigned, transferred, conveyed or subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant may use the services of independent contractors and subcontractors to perform a portion of its obligations under this Contract with the prior written approval of City. Independent contractors and subcontractors shall be provided with a copy of this Contract and Consul tant shall have an affirmative duty to assure that said independent contractors and subcontractors comply with the same and agree to be bound by its terms. Consultant shall be the responsible party with respect to all actions of its independent contractor s and subcontractors, and shall obtain such insurance and indemnity provisions from its contractors and subcontractors as City’s Risk Manager shall determine to be necessary.

G. Consultant, at such times and in such form as City may require, shall furnish City with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Contract, the costs or obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Contract.

H. Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by City to assure proper accounting for all project funds. These records shall be made available for audit purposes to state and federal authorities, or any authorized representative of City.

Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.

I. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Contract in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of Consultant’s profession. All products of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 4 Rev. 6/15
pursuant to this Contract shall be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing the profession of Consultant and its agents, employees and subcontractors assigned to perform the services contemplated by this Contract.

J. All completed reports and other data or documents, or computer media including diskettes, and other materials provided or prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Contract are the property of City, and may be used by City. City shall have all intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, copyright and patent rights, in said documents, computer media, and other materials provided by Consultant. City shall release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, costs, expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.

K. Consultant, including its employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Contract. Consultant shall comply with all requirements of the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 8100 et seq.) and other laws relating to conflicts of interest, including the following: 1) Consult ant shall not make or participate in a decision made by City if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision may have a material effect on Consultant’s economic interest, and 2) if required by the City Attorney, Consultant shall file financial disclosure forms with the City Clerk.

SECTION 5. INSURANCE

A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:

Coverage Required Not Required
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability X
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) X
(Place an “x” in the appropriate box)

B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office form number CG -0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;

2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 5 Rev. 6/15
than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;

3. Statutory Workers’ Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers’ Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.

5. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording “but only in the event of a named insured’s sole negligence” or any other verbiage limiting the insured’s insurance responsibility.

C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officer s, employees, agents and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the followi ng provisions:

1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant; premises owned, leased or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant.

The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

2. The insurance coverage of Consultant shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, s hall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Consultant shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 6 Rev. 6/15
written notice has been given to City. In addition, Consultant agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice has been given to City.

E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.

F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001 as a Certificate Holder of the insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be submitted electronically via the PINS Advantage system. A link will be provided for the Consultant, or their insurance agent, to enter and upload documents directly to PINS Advantage. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved in PINS Advantage by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been submitted as described above or provided in a timely manner.

G. The requirements as to the t ypes and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant as required by Section 5 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Consultant pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.

H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a “claims made” policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945.6, Consultant shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination of this Contract.

I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performa nce of this Contract, Consultant shall immediately notify City’s Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225- 4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Consultant shall submit a written report to City’s Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Consultant’s insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.

SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS

A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2782.8, when the services to be provided under this Contract are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under Section 2782.8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 7 Rev. 6/15
Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reas on of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Con sultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (inclu ding, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

C. The Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s inability to evaluate liability. The Consultant shall respond within thirty (30) calendar days to the tender of any c laim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City.

If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered to City within thirty (30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Consultant herein.

D. The obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.

E. City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Consultant pursuant to this Section to represent City’s interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.

SECTION 7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES

A. This Contract shall be deemed to have been entered into in Redding, California. All questions regarding the validity, interpretation or performance of any of its terms or of any rights or obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be governed by California law. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 8 Rev. 6/15
Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.

C. No covenant or condition to be performed by Consultant under this Contract can be waived except by the written consent of City. Forbearance or indulgence by City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of the covenant or condition in question. Until performance by Consultant of said covenant or condition is complete, City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to City under this Contract or by law or in equity despite said forbearance or indulgence.

D. If any portion of this Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.

E. The headings in this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof. A waiver of any party of any provision or a breach of this Contract must be provided in writing, and shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provisions herein.

F. Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Contract, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares and represents that this Contract is made without reliance upon any statement or representation not contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Contract and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Contract is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code § 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.

G. Each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.

Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 9 Rev. 6/15

H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.

SECTION 8. SURVIVAL

The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.

SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION

A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.

B. In the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the foll owing: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.

SECTION 10. REPRESENTATIVES

A. City’s representative for this Contr act is Mark Christ, telephone number (530) 245- 7136, fax number (530) 245- 7160. All of Consultant’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above -named person, or to the representative's designee.

B. Consultant’s representative for this Contract is Sandra Burkhart , telephone number (800) 434-8349, fax number ( 415) 391-8439. All of City’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person.

C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.

SECTION 11. NOTICES

A. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be deemed given only if in writing signed by an authorized representative of the sender (may be other than the representat ives referred to in Section 10) and delivered by facsimile, with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 10 Rev. 6/15
express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:

To City:

City of Redding
Attn: Mark Christ - Housing
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding CA 96001
To Consultant:

NBS
Sandra Burkhart, Senior Consultant
870 Market Street, Suite 1223
San Francisco CA, 94102

B. Either party may change its address for the purposes of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.

C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.

SECTION 12. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT

A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective parties to this Contract; that they have full r ight, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Contract; and that the execution, performance and delivery of this Contract by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Contract.

B. When the Mayor is signatory to this Contract, the City Manager and/or the Department Director having direct responsibility for managing the services provided herein shall have authority to execute any amendment to this Contract which does not increase the amount of compensation allowable to Consultant or otherwise substantially change the scope of the services provided herein.

SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT

The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.

Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389) Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 12 Rev. 6/15

EXHIBIT A

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Phase I - Initial Analysis & Review

Initial Analysis and Review Report, detailed project schedule, social media accounts for public engagement, active CivicMic.com/Redding platform with initial project information and introduction, phone and email support system for community inquiries, Invitation Postcard #1

Task 1 - Attend Meetings
Attend meetings with City staff and the Downtown Redding PBID Formation Committee for touring of Downtown Redding, review of current market conditions and plans for Downtown Redding, discuss possible boundaries, determine which property owners will be in direct benefit of project, project milestones, and obtain project-related information.

Task 2 - Prepare and Submit Information Needs/Logistics Checklist

Submit to City staff and Downtown Redding PBID Formation Committee a checklist of information needs outlining specific data required in preparation for the formation of the PBID.

Task 3 - Creation of Engagement toolkit:

• Develop a comprehensive toolkit including Project website and social media accounts. • Provide resources to streamline planning and implementation of communication action plans.
• Establish phone and email support lines, with bilingual staff available for Spanish- speaking property owners, and a toll-free phone number for easy access to assistance. • Design and creation of Invitation Postcard #1 detailing project information, website details, and support contact numbers to stakeholders.

Phase II - Document Preparation & Benefit Analysis

Management District Plan Outline and Findings and Recommendations Report, Comprehensive survey, Notification Postcard #2

Task 1 - Conduct Stakeholder Visits and Online Survey

Conduct multiple one-on-one visits with key stakeholders and online survey for Downtown Redding property owners, businesses, and employees.

Task 2 -Attend Meetings

Attend meetings (including community outreach meetings) to facilitate roundtables with Downtown Redding stakeholders, discuss district transportation challenges and opportunities, identify priorities for transportation services, and address questions and/or concerns.

Tack 3 - Budget Development
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 13 Rev. 6/15

Prepare a PBID budget. Budget will include both direct cost of services as well as staff-required support to administrate the PBID and communicate with the general public and with assesses.

This budget should include detailed costs required to provide the services desired by PBID stakeholders.

Task 4 - Assist with Creation of Owners' Association

Provide project plan for the creation of an Owners' Association including, but not limited to:
organizational mission, proposed by-laws, and other required establishment documents.

• Project Planning: Develop a comprehensive plan outlining the steps required to establish the Owners' Association, including the timeline, resources needed, and key milestones. • Mission Statement Development: Collaborate with key stakeholders to create an organizational mission that encapsulates the values, goals, and purpose of the Owners' Association.
• By-Laws and Document Drafting: Work with City Attorney to draft proposed by-laws, Articles of Incorporation and Memorandum of Association for the Owners' Association. • Comprehensive Roadmap Creation: Provide a detailed roadmap delineating the steps for filing for non-profit status, among other key procedures. This service equips the board with the necessary tools and knowledge to confidently navigate these processes.

Task 5 - Parcel Database

Update the existing parcel database for assessor parcels as currently shown on the County assessor's parcel maps or development maps or other available data. The database will include land divisions, ownership and mailing information, and parcel information relevant to the calculation of the assessments.

Task 6 - Special vs. General Benefit Analysis

Review the proposed services, special benefit, general benefit, and recent case law with City staff and legal counsel. Meet with City staff and legal counsel to discuss appropriate and/or alternative approaches to the proposed assessment district. Provide staff with related support for the duration of the project.

Task 7 - City Review

Communicate with City staff for the review of costs, proposed services, survey results, and statute requirements and benefits conferred.

Task 8 - Separation and Quantification of Special and General Benefit

Analyze the services, proposed boundaries, district characteristics, parcel characteristics, special and general benefits conferred, and assessment engineering standards and sources to separate and quantify special vs. general benefit in compliance with the special benefit requirements of Proposition 218 for review by all stakeholders.

Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 14 Rev. 6/15
Task 9 - Management Plan Outline

Prepare the PBID Management Plan Outline which will include the required components as well as suggestions for Owner's Association Board composition.

Task 10 - Findings and Recommendations Report

Prepare a Report summarizing the findings and recommendations. The main goal of the Report is to separate and quantify special and general benefit and to provide a review of feasible Method(s) of Assessment for the proposed assessment district in accordance with the special benefit and proportionality requirements of Proposition 218 and recent case law. The Report will provide analysis and numerical support for the breakdown of special vs. general benefit and a Method of Assessment.

Phase Ill - Management Plan & Engineer's Report Development

Management District Plan, Petitions, Ballots, Informational Flyer

Task 1 - Stakeholder Review

Stakeholders review and approve the draft PBID Management Plan Outline.

Task 2 - Verify And Finalize Property Database

For use in the Engineer's Report and Management Plan, the consultant will confirm the parcel and area profile data including parcel use code, parcel assessed valuation, parcel acreage and building square footage, and updated parcel ownership information.

Task 3 - Develop Informational Flyer

Develop an informational flyer, one or two pages in length, that can be used (handout, mailed) as an overview and communication tool for property owners, business owners, council members, staff and other interested parties.

• Content Creation: Write engaging content that effectively communicates the key information about the Downtown Redding PBID project.
• Printing Management: Coordinate with a print vendor to ensure high-quality printing of the flyer.
• Determine the appropriate paper type, size, and finish to enhance the flyer's appearance and durability.
• Digital Adaptation: Adapt the flyer into a digital format for sharing on the project website, social media platforms, or via email. Ensure the digital version is accessible and easy to read on different devices.

Task 4 - Prepare A Method of Assessment (Rates)

Prepare a Method of Assessment, including rates, in compliance with the proportionality requirements of Proposition 218 for review by all stakeholders.

Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 15 Rev. 6/15

Task 5 - Confirm Assessment Methodology

Confirm the Method of Assessment or assessment methodology, which will adhere to the requirements of special benefit. The assessment methodology will link the benefits of the PBID to the assessed properties.

Task 6 - Develop Full PBID Management Plan

Develop a supportable work plan for the PBID, which will include the required components as well as suggestions for Board composition.

Task 7 - Prepare Engineer's Report

Prepare an Engineer's Report, according to state code, including, but not necessarily limited to the following: a) map of District, b) name of District, c) description of boundaries and zones, d) annual proposed services and activities, e) annual proposed costs, f) total annual proposed expenditures, g) proposed sources of funding/method and basis of assessment in sufficient detail to allow each property owner to calculate the amount of the assessment to be levied against their property, h) assessment collection process, i) duration of levy, j) implementation and completion schedule, k) proposed rules and regulations, and I) list of assessed property and benefit methodology.

Task 8 - Develop Petition

Develop the petition, which requires signatures of property owners totaling 50% of the entire assessment amount weighted by assessments paid. Once the form and content of the petition has been approved by the City Clerk, this petition will be circulated by the PBID Formation Committee.
• Drafting Petition: Craft the language for the petition that clearly outlines the purpose, benefits, and requirements of the Downtown Redding PBID project. Ensure it meets all legal and administrative standards set by the City Clerk and City Legal Counsel. • Petition Approval: Work with the City Clerk and City Legal Counsel to review and approve the petition content and form, ensuring all necessary components are included and formatted correctly.
• Digital Petition Form Creation: Develop a user-friendly digital version of the petition that can be filled out online via the project website.
• Petition Handouts: Design and print hard-copy petition handouts that are easy to read, visually engaging, and compliant with the City Clerk's requirements. • Engagement Strategy Development: Work closely with the PBID Formation Committee and key stakeholders to strategize the most effective ways for the committee to reach property owners and obtain their signatures.
• Monitoring and Reporting: Keep track of the number of signatures obtained and provide regular updates to the PBID Formation Committee.

Task 9 - Create Notice, Ballots, And Resolutions

Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 16 Rev. 6/15
Prepare and mail a notice and ballot package to each property owner consistent with state code to be reviewed by City legal counsel. Prepare the required resolutions, to be reviewed by City legal counsel, for consideration by City Council during the renewal process.

Task 10 - Attend Public Hearing

Prepare for and attend the public hearing and make a presentation as needed.

Task 11 - Provide Final Documents

Provide a final binder with relevant documents, including the Management Plan, Engineer's Report, executed resolutions, ballot summary, etc. All documents in the binder will also be provided in PDF (print digital format).

Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

____________________________________________________________________________________________

Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 17 Rev. 6/15

EXHIBIT B

COST OF SERVICES

Phase 1: Initial Analysis and Review
Task 1 – Attend Meetings…………………………………………………………..……$6,925.00 Task 2 – Prepare and Submit Information Needs/Logistics Checklist….……….……....$1,975.00 Task 3 – Engagement Tool Kit…………………………………………………………..$5,900.00

Phase 1 Subtotal………….………………………..……………………………………$14,800.00

Phase 2: Document Preparation & Benefit Analysis
Task 1 - Conduct Stakeholder Visits and Online Survey………………………………..$6,075.00 Task 2 - Attend Meetings……………………………………………………………….$12,950.00 Task 3 - Budget Development…………………………………………………………...$1,800.00 Task 4 - Assist with Creation of Owners’ Association…………………………………..$6,000.00 Task 5 - Parcel Database…………………………………………………………………$5,400.00 Task 6 - Special Vs. General Benefit Analysis…………………………………………..$5,000.00 Task 7 - City Review…………………………………………………………………………$0.00
Task 8 - Separation and Quantification of Special and General Benefit………………...$5,350.00 Task 9 - Management Plan Outline……………………………………………………...$1,750.00 Task 10 - Findings and Recommendations Report………………………………………$3,700.00

Phase 2 Subtotal………………………………………………………..……………….$48,025.00

Phase 3: Management Plan & Engineer's Report Development

Task 1 - Stakeholder Review…………………………………………………………….$2,975.00 Task 2 - Verify and Finalize Property Database…………………………………………$2,750.00 Task 3 - Develop Informational Flyer…………………………………………………...$2,950.00 Task 4 - Prepare A Method of Assessment (Rates)……………………………………...$3,500.00 Task 5 - Confirm Assessment Methodology…………………………………………….$1,650.00 Task 6 - Develop Full PBID Management Plan…………………………………………$2,800.00 Task 7 - Prepare Engineer’s Report……………………………………………………...$7,400.00 Task 8 - Develop Petition………………………………………………………………..$5,200.00 Task 9 -Create Notice, Ballots, And Resolutions………………………………………..$2,500.00 Task 10 - Attend Public Hearing………………………………………………………...$3,600.00 Task 11 - Provide Final Documents……………………………………………………...$1,850.00

Phase 3 Subtotal………………………………………………………..……………….$37,175.00

Subtotal Fee for Phases 1, 2 & 3…………………………………………………….$100,000.00

Estimated Printing & Mailing Expenses…………………………………………………$6,000.00 Estimated Travel Expenses………………………………………………………………$7,500.00

GRAND TOTAL $113,500.00
Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: NBS Consulting and Professional Services Agreement (4.2(c)--Award Request for Proposals Schedule 5389)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Conduct a public hearing and, upon conclusion:
(1) Adopt Resolution to disestablish the Redding Midtown Mall Project No. 1 Benefit Assessment District 1993-1 (District);
(2) Authorize the City Manager to terminate the Agreement with Midtown Mall Benefit Corporation (MMBC) for the Operation and Maintenance of the Market Street Promenade (Agreement); and
(3) Authorize staff to work with the District property owners, other Downtown property owners, and interested groups to research the feasibility of forming a Landscape Maintenance District (LMD), Property Based Improvement District (PBID) , and/or a Business Improvement District (BID).

Fiscal Impact

The District is funded by a benefit assessment in the am ount of three cents per month for the square footage of the respective parcel sizes for an annual total of approximately $101,600 . The City of Redding (City) collects the funds and distributes the funds quarterly to the Midtown Mall Benefit Corporation (MMBC). There is no impact to the City’s general fund ; however, there are City staff costs associated with administering the assessment that will terminate if the disestablishment is supported by the City Council (Council).

Alternative Action

The Council could choose to not to adopt a resolution to disestablish the District and provide staff with an alternative direction.

MEETING DATE: September 15, 2020
ITEM NO. 6.1
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.1--Public Hearing to consider the Disestablishment of the Redding Midtown Mall Project No. 1, Benefit Assessment District No. 1993-1 Larry Vaupel, Development
Services Director
Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Staff Report From September 15, 2020, City Council Meeting - Disestablishment of the Midtown Mall Project No. 1, Benefit Report to Redding City Council September 9, 2020
Re: 6.1--Public Hearing Re: Disestablishment of Redding Midtown Mall Project No.1 Page 2

Background/Analysis

In 1992, owners of real property included in the former Downtown Redding Mall area requested formation of an assessment district. Subsequently, Government Code section 54720 was adopted to specifically permit formation of the Redding Midtown Mall Project No. 1, Benefit Assessment District No. 1993 -1 (also referred to as the “Mall” or “District”). On August 17, 19 93, the City Council adopted a resolution of intention to form the District by means of the Benefit Assessment District Act of 1982. The City Council conducted a public hearing on August 17, 1993, and then again on September 7, 1993. After conclusion of the public hearing on September 7, 1993, the City Council adopted Resolution 93-332 thereby forming the District.

The property owners within the District formed the Midtown Mall Benefit Corporation (MMBC) to contract with the City of Redding through an Ope ration and Maintenance Agreement (Agreement) to assist with maintaining the District. Specific maintenance tasks generally included: landscape, walkway, public restroom, lighting, ventilation, parking facility and water feature maintenance , and janitorial and security services. In July 2009, following the second phase of the mall roof removal, the District was renamed as the Market Street Promenade (Promenade) and the Agreement between MMBC and the City was modified accordingly.

Today, there are a number of improvements occurring within the Promenade that include the creation of new commercial and retail storefronts/spaces; the development of 82 new residential units; reconstruction of the underground parking facility , and revitalization of existing faca des and building spaces. Along with these developments, the City’s infrastructure is changing. One notable City project is the City’s reconstruction of the Yuba and Butte Street connections to California Street and southbound Market Street connection from Tehama to Yuba Street collectively known as the Downtown Street Circulation Project. The Project includes: extensive reconstruction of aging underground utilities including wastewater, water and electric; new sidewalks and street surfaces with a blend of concrete, asphalt concrete and concrete pavers; new street lights; and landscaping that compliments the new and existing aesthetics of the variety of projects being completed within Downtown. Construction is progressing and projected to be completed in November 2020.

In consideration of the legal form of the District, new legislation governing assessment districts, and these new improvements, the District originally formed to maintain the Downtown Mall needs to be modified accordingly. Therefore, in Febru ary 2020, City staff met with District property owners to provide formation background, to update the group on the Downtown projects, and to discuss the future of the District and the Agreement. There are a total of 18 properties within the District for a combined 207,961 square feet represented by 12 property owners.

Based on the meeting, five options were emailed to the Promenade property owners including the following:

 Option 1: Maintain the existing District boundary and modify the Agreement between the City and MMBC.
 Option 2: Option 1 with a boundary adjustment that would allow other adjacent properties to voluntarily annex into the District.
 Option 3: Dissolve the District by petition, terminate the Agreement , and consider forming a Landscape Maintenance District (LMD).

Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Staff Report From September 15, 2020, City Council Meeting - Disestablishment of the Midtown Mall Project No. 1, Benefit Report to Redding City Council September 9, 2020
Re: 6.1--Public Hearing Re: Disestablishment of Redding Midtown Mall Project No.1 Page 3

 Option 4: Option 3 without an LMD.
 Option 5: City to coordinate and hold a workshop to discuss the formation of a Property Based Improvement District (PBID) or a Business Improvement District (BID).

In response to the options p resented, six property owners representing 50 percent of the properties provided their specific option preferring either Option 3 or a combination preferring Option 4 and 5. No responses were received supporting Option 1 or 2. The underlying message between their preferences was to disestablish the District and terminate the Agreement between the City and MMBC thereby providing an opportunity to explore options to reform the assessment district, if needed. To best facilitate this process, in March 2020, the City’s Treasurer’s office froze the collection of any further Promenade assessments and the City Attorney drafted a Petition to Dissolve Benefit Assessment District No. 1993-1 (Petition).

The intent of the Petition was to: (1) recognize that portions of the commercial areas and most of the common area within the District have undergone significant changes that include the reintroduction of the public streets and rights -of-way, and redevelopment of multiple parcels for residential and/or commercial purpose s; (2) confirm with each District property owner, that due to these significant changes, the existing benefit assessment district is no longer viable as a means to maintain the District; and (3) request for the City Council to direct staff to work with the property owners to research the viability of establishing an LMD, PBID, BID , or a combination of the three.

On June 19, 2020, the Petition was emailed to each Promenade property owner. To date, seven property owners representing 11 properties consisti ng of 124,133 square -feet or 59.69 percent submitted their Petition. Staff sent follow -up emails with a deadline extension to early August 2020 and was able to connect with a few of the owners by phone, but the remaining seven property owners did not respo nd and are thereby documented as such. As with the formation of the Promenade District, each property owner’s vote is based or weighted by the square -footage of their respective parcel(s), and the 11 Petitions submitted represent a weighted majority.

The public hearing notice was published once per week for two successive weeks in accordance with Government Code 6066. In addition, individual notices of the public hearing were provided to each District property owner.

The products of the Downtown develo pments, both redevelopment and new construction activities, lend themselves to Downtown becoming a destination that is a unique, well - maintained, and secure area for the community and visitors to enjoy. In order for the area to offer a higher level of stre et and park maintenance beyond general City -provided services; landscape amenities; additional security; specialized lighting; marketing and branding; and/or events, researching the viability for establishing a new assessment district to fund these types o f activities provides the property owners and/or businesses the opportunity to decide how and for what the district could be formed . The level of amenities and their associated costs, if any, will be determined by the District property owners and brought back to Council for consideration.

Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Staff Report From September 15, 2020, City Council Meeting - Disestablishment of the Midtown Mall Project No. 1, Benefit Report to Redding City Council September 9, 2020
Re: 6.1--Public Hearing Re: Disestablishment of Redding Midtown Mall Project No.1 Page 4

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
Resolution
Exhibit A Execut ed Petitions to Dissolve Benefit Assessment District No 1993 -1 (available online)
Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Staff Report From September 15, 2020, City Council Meeting - Disestablishment of the Midtown Mall Project No. 1, Benefit

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following:
(1) Accept the report providing a summary from the Downtown Property Owner Assessment District meetings;
(2) Direct staff to host/coordinate an Assessment District Work shop facilitated by an Assessment District consultant firm or individual to educate downtown property owners, businesses and stakeholders about assessment district forms/options, legal structure, potential boundaries, eligible activities, processes, associated costs and timeline; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate the consultant contract and allocate funding in an amount not to exceed $5,000 for the cost of the workshop.

Fiscal Impact

Staff estimates that $5,000 will be needed to host and pay f or the consultant to facilitate the workshop. Funding will be appropriated from the Public Works Division, Parking Lot Improvements Account. There is sufficient funding in the account to fulfill the contract without negatively affecting other activities.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could accept the report and provide other direction to staff.

Background/Analysis

On September 15, 2020 , the Council adopted a resolution to disestablish the Redding Midtown Mall Project No. 1 Benefit Assessment District (District). As part of the Council resolution, staff was directed to use best efforts to coordinate with owners of record within the former boundaries of the District in order to facilitate/research the feasibility for the establishment of a new assessment district.

MEETING DATE: May 18, 2021
ITEM NO. 9.2(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(a)--Consider the Redding Downtown Assessment District Update and provide direction relative to coordination of an Assessment District Workshop.

Steve Bade, Deputy City
Manager
Packet Pg. 333Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Staff Report From May 18, 2021, City Council Meeting - Consider the Redding Downtown Assessment District Update and Provide Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2021
Re: 9.2(a)--Downtown Assessment District Update Page 2

The former district was comprised of 18 properties with 12 owners. During March 2021, staff met with nine of the 12 property owners or their representatives, the remaining three property owners were non-responsive. The District property owners are a mix of long-time owners – over 40 years – to owners that have been in the area for a few years to a few months. The long-time owners have invested for years to maintain, operate and market the former district. These business owners performed very well through some trying times created by economic market shifts that were not anticipated but had to be addressed to make their properties viable. The rest of the owners, 10 years of ownership or less, invested into the former district to be part of the Downtown transformation – to create Downtown as a unique place – a destination.

The purpose of this report is to provide a summary of the meetings held between the District property owners and staff and allow an opportunity for the Council t o provide additional direction to staff. In general, staff provided an overview of the Downtown projects; informed these business owners of current City maintenance obligations and levels of service which are similar to all areas of the City; and gathered feedback considering the new and future improvements, the maintenance of those improvements and the desired vision of the former district.

The key to summarizing the property owners’ opinions is recognizing that each property owner is having a differen t experience and reaction to the new improvements that surround their property. Their individual experiences range from cautious optimism to full support as they get comfortable with the new improvements. It is collectively realized that the restoration of the Downtown street grid and completion of Market Center has created Downtown as an active space with new residents in the area and an uptick in pedestrian traffic thereby improving business activity. The community is enjoying the new improvements – streets with pavers, pedestrian plazas, enhanced lighting, landscape features and art complementing the area. Some properties are having a direct impact while others are seeing indirect impacts – it is overall positive feedback from all.

With these new impro vements in mind, there is a collective interest in Downtown being safe, well-lit, and maintained at a level above general City -services. This interest brings out questions from the business owners that include:
▪ Can the City maintain the new improvements? Or, can the City maintain the improvements until the Block 7 Projects are complete and we are familiar with our surroundings?
▪ Is an assessment district needed? Let’s learn - what are the options, boundaries, eligible activities, costs and timeline? Who would take the lead? ▪ Is it possible to have a higher level of security, catenary lighting, trash cans with weekly collections and improved wayfinding signage/maintenance? ▪ What is the best way to pay for parking? We do not want to subsidize parking for all of Downtown.
▪ Can we explore a third-party parking management company to assist the City?

Since December 15, 2020, the City , through its Building Maintenance and Parks Divisions, has been maintaining the former district by picking up trash weekly and respond ing to maintenance requests on an as -needed basis. The public restroom facility is locked and is made available for special events. Art features are repaired by City staff coordinating with a variety of City divisions and Downtown groups.

Packet Pg. 334Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: Staff Report From May 18, 2021, City Council Meeting - Consider the Redding Downtown Assessment District Update and Provide Report to Redding City Council May 10, 2021
Re: 9.2(a)--Downtown Assessment District Update Page 3

The City has formed development partnerships to help facilitate the revitalization of Downtown, infrastructure improvements, restoration of the streets that include: expanded sidewalks, vehicle and pedestrian pavers, potted plants instead of bollards, trees, and pedestri an-scale lighting.

These improvements are unique – they are of a higher quality in line with the vision of the Downtown Specific Plan and the Downtown Redding Community -Based Transportation Plan (the Downtown Plans). Both Downtown Plans suggest that assess ment districts are a good funding tool to pay for ongoing maintenance of improvements in the public realm.

Considering the meetings held and the feedback collected by staff, the District property owners have an interest in the City coordinating with an a ssessment district consultant to learn about the various assessment district forms/options, legal structure, potential boundaries, eligible activities, process, associated costs and timeline. If the Council is supportive of this concept, staff will host an assessment district workshop to answer these questions; query the District property owners for preferred direction and report back to the Council with an update.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality o f communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 335Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: Staff Report From May 18, 2021, City Council Meeting - Consider the Redding Downtown Assessment District Update and Provide

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve and authorize the following:
(1) Approve a Lease Agreement with Aircraft Service Specialists for Executive Hangar No. 1 at the Redding Regional Airport for a five -year term, at $911 per month , adjusted annually based on the consumer price index, with the total five year estimated value of the lease to be $56,000, assuming target inflation of two percent; (2) Authorize the Mayor to sign and execute the agreement; and (3) Find that the action is categorically exemp t from review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15301 – Existing Facilities.

Fiscal Impact

The lease agreement is for a five-year term with rental payments in an amount established in the City of Redding (City) Master F ee Schedule. The F iscal Year 2023-24 monthly rate for an executive hangar at the Redding Regional Airport (RDD) is $911 per month adjusted annually based on the consumer price index. The total value of the lease over the five-year term is estimated at $56,000, assuming target inflation of two percent.

Alternative Action

City Council may choose not to approve the lease agreement and provide alternative direction to staff.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.2(d)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement with Aircraft Service Specialists for Executive Hangar No. 1 at the Redding Regional Airport
Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 73
Report to Redding City Council May 1, 2024
Re: 4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement Page 2

Background/Analysis

The City is the owner and operator of the RDD which pro vides services for general aviation and scheduled commercial air service traffic. In addition to services provided by fixed base operators, RDD offers aircraft storage space to members of the public. Aircraft storage at the RDD exists in the form of tie -down spaces, closed hangars, and other types of hangars including executive hangars. The airport may not unlawfully discriminate against airport users or provide certain forms of exclusive use to commercial operators, however, airport users interested in conducting a commercial operat ion at the airport must conform with airport standards and compliance policy, which include s the requirement to obtain a commercial operating permit. To achieve this, the City executes a lease agreement and commercial operating p ermit document with the interested party while rental payments are set by the City’s Master Fee Schedule.

Aircraft Service Specialists is the current tenant of Executive Hangar No. 1 at RDD. The existing lease agreement and operating permit with Aircraft Service Specialists reached its term in August 2022 and has continued as a month-to-month agreement. This new agreement sets a term for the hangar occupancy and commercial operating permit and ties rental payments to the rate as established in the Master Fee Schedule. Under the new commercial operating permit , Aircraft Service Specialists will be permitted to operate an engine rebuilding and restoration business within Executive Hangar No. 1 and provide aerial fire spotting based out of RDD for lumber companies.

In accordance with Government Code section 54221(f)(1)(O), land that is owned by a California public use airport on which residential uses are prohibited pursuant to the Federal Aviation Administration Order 5190.6B are declared exempt surplus land.

Environmental Review

Staff has determined that lease agreement approval is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act , pursuant to Section 15301 – Existing Facilities. Class 1 exemptions includ e the permitting, le asing, and operation of public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features that involve negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The action will result in a negligible expansion of use, as Aircraft Servic e Specialists is the current tenant and will continue to provide services in Executive Hangar No. 1. The lease area is located within a built environment, and the action has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”

Attachments
Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease
NOE Lease Agreement Executive Hangar No. 1
Packet Pg. 74
Packet Pg. 75
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 76
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 79
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 80
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 81
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 82
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 90
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 91
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 92
Attachment: Aircraft Service Specialists New Lease (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement) Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: NOE Lease Agreement Executive Hangar No. 1 (4.2(d)--Approve Lease Agreement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Resolution authorizing the City Manager, or designee, on behalf of the City of Redding as the Administrative Entity for the NorCal Continuum of Care (CoC) to execute contracts or agreements, of any amount, approved by the CoC Executive Board; and authorize City of Redding Housing Division staff to administer, monitor and report on the respective contracts and/or agreements.

Fiscal Impact

Adopting the resolution will not impact the genera l fund as t he City of Redding (City) as the Administrative Entity (AE) to the NorCal Continuum of Care (CoC) is funded for administrative and project costs through various CoC grants.

Alternative Action

City Council (Council) may choose not to approve authorizing the City Manager for the City as the AE to execute contracts or administer grant funds for the CoC - this decision would be in conflict with the memorandum of understanding previously executed with the CoC.

Background/Analysis

The CoC’s seven-member Executive Board (Executive Board) is the governing body for the CoC and consists of representatives voted in by the CoC Advisory Boards, as outlined in the Governance Charter. On September 19, 2023, Council approved the City becoming the AE to the CoC for a two -year term; authorized the City Manager to negotiate and sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the CoC’s Executive Board; and provided authority to the City Manager for grant application submissions and subsequent appropriation of funds on behalf of the CoC.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.2(e)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(e)--Consider Resolution authorizing the City Manager on behalf of the City of Redding as the A dministrative Entity for the NorCal Continuum of Care (CoC) to execute CoC Executive Board approved contracts.

Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 94
Report to Redding City Council May 1, 2024
Re: 4.2(e)--NorCal CoC Authorization for City Manager to Execute Agreements and Administer Grant Funds Page 2

At the April 18, 2024 , the Executive Board meeting, the City Manager or his designee was approved as the signatory for all CoC agreements . To memorialize this election by the Executive Board, staff is requesting Council formally sign a resolution detailing the City Manager’s authority with regard to contracts and fiscal authorities as related to the CoC.

Environmental Review

Applying for and administering grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Applying for and administering grant funding is considered an exempt activity under the National Environmental Policy Act, 24 CFR 58.34(a)(3).

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century - “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
^Resolution COC Signature Authority
MOU NorCal CoC
Packet Pg. 95

RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

APPROVING THE CONTRACT SIGNATURE AUTHORITY AND GRANT

APPROPRIATION OF THE CITY MANAGER WITH REGARD TO THE

NORCAL CONTINUUM OF CARE

WHEREAS, on September 19, 2023, the City Council authorized the City of Redding (“City”) to serve as the interim Administrative Entity for the NorCal Continuum of Care (“CoC”) Executive Board for a two -year ter m; authori zed the City Manager to negotiate and sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the NorCal Continuum of Care outlining the respective roles and responsibilities of the City of Redding as the NorCal Continuum of Care’s Administrative Entity; and authorized the City Manager to submit applications or documents necessary to apply for grants that become available on behalf of the NorCal Continuum of Care; and

WHEREAS, the City of Redding and the CoC Executive Board have executed a Memorandum of Understanding dated February 29, 2024 , to document each party’s duties and responsibilities; and

WHEREAS, on April 18, 2024, the CoC Executive Board additionally clarified and approved the City of Redding’s City Manager or designee as signatory for all NorCal Continuum of Care agreements and applications; and

WHEREAS, the CoC Executive Board has the ultimate authority to appropriate those grants allocated to the CoC from Federal, State and Local sources; and

WHEREAS, the City of Redding has City Council -approved contra ct processing guidelines that limit the City Manager contract signature authority for City Contracts to $200,000, unless otherwise approved by City Council; and

WHEREAS, the City of Redding as Administrative Entity to the NorCal Continuum of Care will need the City Manager or designee to sign contracts in excess of $200,000;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding hereby authorizes the City Manager or d esignee to submit grant applications, appropriate, administer and implement grant projects and execute all agreements or contracts, regardless of contract award amounts, for the NorCal Continuum of Care.

Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: ^Resolution COC Signature Authority (4.2(e)--NorCal CoC Authorization for City Manager to Execute Agreements and Administer

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of May, 2024, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

____________________________________
TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: ^Resolution COC Signature Authority (4.2(e)--NorCal CoC Authorization for City Manager to Execute Agreements and Administer Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: MOU NorCal CoC (4.2(e)--NorCal CoC Authorization for City Manager to Execute Agreements and Administer Grant Funds) Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: MOU NorCal CoC (4.2(e)--NorCal CoC Authorization for City Manager to Execute Agreements and Administer Grant Funds) Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: MOU NorCal CoC (4.2(e)--NorCal CoC Authorization for City Manager to Execute Agreements and Administer Grant Funds) Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: MOU NorCal CoC (4.2(e)--NorCal CoC Authorization for City Manager to Execute Agreements and Administer Grant Funds) Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: MOU NorCal CoC (4.2(e)--NorCal CoC Authorization for City Manager to Execute Agreements and Administer Grant Funds)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the City Manager to finali ze contract negotiations and execute a three-year agreement with the Center for Internet Security, in an amount not to exceed $222,750, for endpoint security protection and 24x7x365 endpoint monitoring services for the City of Redding.

Fiscal Impact

There will be no fiscal impact as a result of this agreement. Funds for end point security were appropriated during the City of Redding’s Biennial Budget 2023-25 process. Additionally, due to increased services that would be provided by the Center for Internet Security (CIS) , the City of Redding’s (City) Information Technology (IT) Department will realize savings by terminating agreements for other duplicative cyber security solutions.

Alternative Action

The City Council could choose to not approve this con tract with CIS and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis

IT currently utilizes Carbon Black for the City’s cyber security endpoint protection. In the past, the City would purchase its Carbon Black licenses and support from Dell; how ever, due to corporate changes and restructuring, Dell announced th ey would no longer renew our Carbon Black support. As of now, our support is scheduled to expire on June 16, 2024.

It is imperative that t he City retain a strong cyber security posture wh ich means a new endpoint security solution must be acquired. After reaching out to other government agencies the City’s Cyber Security Officer discovered a solution provided by CIS. CIS is a nonprofit, community driven organization that is dedicated to mak ing the Internet a safer place. They receive funding MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.3(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.3(a)--Endpoint Security Replacement
Tony Van Boekel, Chief
Information Officer/IT
Director
Packet Pg. 103
Report to Redding City Council May 1, 2024
Re: 4.3(a)--Endpoint Security Replacement Page 2

from the Department of Homeland Security and other federal sources that subsidizes the cost of resources and services such as their Endpoint Security Services (ESS). CIS resources and services are provided to state, local, tribal, and territorial government entities for reduced cost or sometimes free. The City already takes advantage of the Multi -State Information Sharing and Analysis Center and CIS Benchmarks provided by CIS.

CIS ESS utilizes best -in-class, endpoint protection from Crowd Strike. Crowd Strike partnered with CIS to provide security services to approved go vernments agencies, such as the City .

Through ESS, the City would be able to leverage various cyber security solutions such as CrowdStrike’s Falcon Prevent, Falcon Insight, Falcon Spotlight, Falcon Discover, Falcon Device Control, and Falcon Firewall Management at a discounted price. Additionally, CIS ESS provides a 24x7x365 Security Operations Center to monitor endpoint security, provide th reat hunting, malware analysis, and incident response. As the City and its operations become more technology focus, services such as this monitoring are extremely valuable.

As proposed, the City Manager would negotiate a contract between the City and Center for Internet Security to provide endpoint cyber security solutions and 24x7x365 endpoint monitoring services for a three-year term in amount not to exceed $222,750.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under California Environmental Qua lity Act, and no future action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Packet Pg. 104

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 41st Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $1,100,000 for the City of Redding (City) South City Park Revitalization Project funded by $ 300,000 from the City’s Park In -Lieu fund and $800,000 from the City’s Park Development fund.

Fiscal Impact

The funds requested for the $1.1 million appropriation come from revenue collected from Park In-Lieu and Park Development fees. Community Services Department s taff is requestin g to appropriate $1,100,000 for the South City Revitalization Project funded by $300,000 from the Park In-Lieu fund and $800,000 from the Park Development fund. Fee revenue is used to acquire necessary parkland, develop new parks, or increase the capacity of existing facilities.

Preconstruction and construction activities for the South City Park revitalization p roject are appropriate uses of these funds. Staff identified these funding sources in previous staff reports and grant applications as matching funds for the project.

In October of 2023, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development approved a $2.4 million Community Development Block Grant Section 108 Loan . The Section 108 Loan will fund the design and construction of infrastructure improvements at South City Park. In 2023, staff applied for and recently received notice of an award for an Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership program (ORLP) grant through the National Park Service for $3.5 million. The program requires a 50% match ($3.5 million) fo r the project’s total budget of $7 million.

Considering the proposed City of Redding (City) funds, Section 108 loan , and grant award, the available project funds will total $7 million, fulfilling the match requirement.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.6(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In -Lieu and Park Development Funds for South City Park
Travis Menne, Director of
Community Services
Packet Pg. 105
Report to Redding City Council May 1, 2024
Re: 4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and Park Development Funds for South City Park Page 2

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could decline to adopt the budget resolution for the project, which would require the Community Services Department to find an alternate funding source to complete the project, or provide staff with an alternate direction.

Background/Analysis

At their June 21, 2022 meeting, Council approved a concept to reimagine South City Park and authorized staff to refine the concept, develop a plan, and estimate project costs with assistance from Project for Public Spaces. To move forward with the design process, on January 16, 2024, Council awarded the architectural and engineering services to design South City Park to Gates & Associates. The first phase of implementing the project, estimated to cost $7 million, will include the following elements of the South City Park design and reactivation plan:

• Destination playground with spray/misting/water feature; • Arrival and activities plaza;
• Flex greenspace;
• Pickleball court complex;
• Youth area, including a skate plaza, basketball court, lounge a reas, climbing, and rope features;
• New restrooms;
• Improvements and renovations to the existing K1 baseball field and bocce ball courts; • Conversion of existing pathways to a walking/jogging loop with wayfinding and distance markers;
• Lighting and landscaping throughout;
• Small dog park; and
• Removal of the existing tennis courts and basketball courts.

With the upcoming ORLP grant award, the City must now substantiate its match sources as it begins to incur project expenses and execute contracts with the grant agency. For this purpose, two internal funds are generally available for park construction. First, P ark In-Lieu Fees, which are collected when a subdivision map is recorded and are assigned to one of four geographic areas, or quadrants, based on the subdiv ision’s location. Fees are spent only on park improvements within that part of the City, which, in this case, is the City’s southwest quadrant.

Secondly, the Park Development Fund, which collects impact fees on residential and commercial (including office and industrial) building permits to mitigate the impacts to the existing park system and offset the costs of developing new and/or improving existing parkland. Funding the design and construction of the revitalization of South City Park is an appropriate u se of both funding sources.

Environmental Review

This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. On December 6, 2022, Council found that the project is categorically exempt from review under the CEQA Guidelines, per Sections 15301(d) – Existing Facilities, 15302(c) – Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303(d & e) - New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures.

Packet Pg. 106
Report to Redding City Council May 1, 2024
Re: 4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and Park Development Funds for South City Park Page 3

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make bett er decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”

Attachments
^Resolution
Previous Staff Report - Award RFP - January 16, 2024
Previous Staff Report - Grant Application - December 6, 2022 Previous Staff Report - Approve Funding Changes - November 1, 2022 Packet Pg. 107
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 41st AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060 APPROPRIATING $1,100,000 FOR THE SOUTH CITY PARK REVITALIZATION PROJECT FUNDED BY $300,000 FROM THE PARK IN-LIEU FUND AND $800,000

FROM THE PARK DEVELOPMENT FUND

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
151
151
1795
1796
Parks In-Lieu Capital
Parks Development
$300,000
$800,000

THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase (Decrease) Revenue
151-1795-2910000-00000 Fund Balance 300,000
151-1796-2910000-00000 Fund Balance 800,000
Increase (Decrease) Expenditures
151-1795-7200008-00000 Recreation Areas 300,000$
151-1796-7200008-00000 Recreation Areas 800,000$
Total 1,100,000$ 1,100,000$

THAT the purpose is to appropriate $1,100,000 for the South City Park Revitalization Project funded by $300,000 from the Park In-Lieu fund and $800,000 from the Park Development fund.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of May, 2024, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 108
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and Park Development Funds for South City Park)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following actions relative to R equest for Proposals Schedule No. 5418, Architectural and Engineering Design Services for the South City Park Project:
(1) Award to Gates & Associates;
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute a Consulting and Professional Services Contract with Gates & Associates for an amount not to exceed $623,050; and (3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve any amendments up to $62,300.

Fiscal Impact

The cost of the ar chitectural and engineering design for the South City Park Project is estimated at $623,050. The City of Redding (City) currently has $3.5 million in identified funding for the project, which is anticipated to cost a total of $7 million. In October of 2023 , the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development approved a $2.4 million Community Development Block Grant Section 108 Loan . The Section 108 Loan will fund the design and construction of infrastructure improvements at South City Park. The re maining funding identified for the project consists of $1.1 million in Park Development and In -Lieu funds. Staff has applied for multiple grants to make up the $3.5 million difference and expects awards to be announced in January 2024.

Since South City Park is not part of a landscape maintenance district, the new park facilities will require further funding for operations and maintenance. Anticipated maintenance costs will be explored as part of the City’s unmet needs workshop in March.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could choose not to award the contract to Gates & Associates and provide staff with an alternate direction.

MEETING DATE: January 16, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.6(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(a)--Award RFP Schedule 5418 for Architectural and Engineering Services for South City Park
Travis Menne, Director of
Community Services
Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Award RFP - January 16, 2024 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and Park Development Report to Redding City Council January 11, 2024
Re: 4.6(a)--Award RFP Schedule 5418 Page 2

Background/Analysis

At their June 21, 2022 meeting, the Council approved a concept to reimagine South City Park and authorized staff to refine the concept, develop a program, and estimate project costs with assistance from Project for Public Spaces. At the December 6, 2022 Council meeting, Council approved the resulting South City Park Activation Plan and a grant applic ation for the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership (ORLP) program. Staff submitted the ORLP grant application, and CA State Parks recommended it to National Parks Service for the next competitive round.

An announcement is expected in January 2024.

Staff is beginning the design process for the project, which is estimated to cost $7 million for the following components of the South City Park Design and Activation Plan:

• Destination playground with spray/misting/water feature; • Arrival and activities plaza;
• Flex greenspace;
• Pickleball court complex;
• Youth area, including a skate plaza, basketball court, lounge areas, climbing, and rope features;
• Improvements and renovations to existing restrooms, baseball field, and bocce ball courts;
• Conversion of existing pathways to a walking/jogging loop with wayfinding and distance markers;
• Lighting and landscaping throughout;
• Small dog park; and
• Removal of the existing tennis courts and basketball courts.

As part of the design process, the City must contract with qualifi ed design firms to create buildable plans for project construction as outlined above. On October 23, 2023, t he City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for architectural and engineering services to design South City Park. The RFP resulted in five firms submitting proposals, listed as follows:

• Gates & Associates;
• NJA Architecture;
• Melton Design Group;
• Roach & Campbell; and
• CALA.

A three-member selection panel , consisting of City staff from the Engineering Division and the Community Services Department, e valuated the proposals based on the criteria outlined in the RFP. The criteria consisted of project understanding, project approach, responsible personnel, project schedule and related experience, which included a minimum of three references.

Following the review of the proposals and ranking by staff, the group selected Gates & Associates as their overall recommendation.

Packet Pg. 110
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Award RFP - January 16, 2024 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and Park Development Report to Redding City Council January 11, 2024
Re: 4.6(a)--Award RFP Schedule 5418 Page 3

It was the opinion of the selection panel that Gates & Associates demonstrated an ability to meet the objectives of the RFP, fully understood the activation plan, and related the importance of creating the perception of safety through design. The consultant had several examples of park projects and many with similar renovations . Their team makeup also scored highly. They were one of only two consultants that submitted proposals with a team that included a skate park design firm, which will be necessary for the youth area’s skate plaza. Lastly, when City staff contacted their references, Gates & Associates were highly recommended by previous clients.

The RFP is a qualification-based selection process. Following the proposal review and coming to a group consensus , staff evaluated the cost proposal and determined the proposed costs are consistent with pre -proposal estimates and they provide good value for the services included.

Additionally, Gates & Associates’ cost proposal was the lowest received.

Environmental Review

This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. On December 6, 2022, Council found that the project is categorically exempt from review under the CEQA Guidelines, per Sections 15301(d) – Existing Facilities, 15302(c) – Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303(d & e) - New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”

• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
Consulting and Professional Services Contract - Signed
Previous Staff Report - Grant Application - December 6, 2022 Previous Staff Report - Grant Application - June 6, 2023 Previous Staff Report - Approve Funding Changes - November 1, 2022 Packet Pg. 111
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Award RFP - January 16, 2024 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and Park Development

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following relative to the design, funding, permitting, engineering, and construction of improvements at South City Park:
(1) Approve the conceptual plan;
(2) Authorize the submission of an Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership application in the amount of $3.5 million to begin phase one construction of the South City Park improvements;
(3) Find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the Califo rnia Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, per Sections 15301(d) – Existing Facilities, 15302(C) – Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303(d & e) - New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures; and
(4) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to complete the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Program application process.

Fiscal Impact

Approving the conceptual plan has no direct fiscal impact. This decision will set a course in motion to secure the funding necessary to construct this park design.

The Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership (ORLP) Program grant application will request up to $3.5 million to begin phase one construction of the South City Park (Park) improvements. The ORLP Program requires a 50 percent match, which will be sourced from the CDBG Section 108 Loan authorized by the City Council (Council) at the November 1, 2022 , meeting and additional park development and grant funds . Funding for phase two elements of the Park project will require alternate funding sources and/or additional grants.

MEETING DATE: December 6, 2022
ITEM NO. 9.6(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.6(a)--Consider conceptual plan and authorize submittal of the Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership Grant Application for South City Park in the City of Redding.

Kim Niemer, Community
Services Director
Packet Pg. 112
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Grant Application - December 6, 2022 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and Park Report to Redding City Council December 1, 2022
Re: 9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park Page 2

Alternative Action

The Council could choose to not approve the conceptual plan, decline to apply for the funds under this grant opportunity, or provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis

South City Park, Redding’s oldest park, is nearly 100 years old and is uniquely poised to serve the community. It has, within its boundaries, a baseball field, bocce ball courts, tennis courts, a basketball court, walkways, and open grassy areas for p icnicking, sitting, and other informal uses. In recent years, community utilization decreased , and the Park needed revitalization to return to its original vibrancy. On November 16, 2021, staff presented a proposal to the Council, recommended by the Commun ity Services Advisory Commission, to conduct a broad community engagement effort regarding the future of the Park.

Since the City Council approved a thorough community process to address the future of the Park in November 2021, the Community Services Depa rtment has launched a series of engagements.

Three open houses were conducted — two in -person and on -site and another through Zoom.

Community Services Department staff led discussions and used pop -up boards to collect data that reflects the priorities of the community. Staff also created an online survey in order to reach greater community engagement and reach those who were not able to be heard or were unable to attend open houses. From December 1 through January 19, the public survey collected almost 1,300 responses. Results highlighted the difficulty in accessing the park by foot or bike and the perception of a current lack of safety when utilizing the Park.

Staff retained the services of Project for Public Spaces (PPS), a multi -disciplinary firm that ha s facilitated many public placemaking community engagement efforts, published multiple studies and reports on the subject, and assisted communities in reactivating neglected public spaces. PPS made two extended site visits and convened over a dozen focus g roups as well as key interviews.

At the June 16, 2022, meeting, the Council approved a concept to reimagine the Park and authorized staff to refine the concept, develop a program, and estimate project costs with PPS.

At the Council meeting on November 15, 2022, the Council requested the item be reconsidered at the December 6, 2022, meeting.

The consideration is for the updated conceptual plan, including a revised layout including:

• Arrival and activities plaza (7,300 sq. ft.)
• Destination playground (25,200 sq. ft.)
• Multi-use pavilion (4,500 sq. ft.)
• Covered porch (1,600 sq. ft.)
• Flex lawn (26,500 sq. ft.)
• Pickleball Courts (17,280 sq. ft.)
• Youth area (12,000 sq. ft.)
• Fenced dog area (6,000 sq. ft.)

Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Grant Application - December 6, 2022 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and Park Report to Redding City Council December 1, 2022
Re: 9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park Page 3

The design draws from over 40 years of placemaking work in communities large and small, focused on bringing neglected and underutilized spaces back to life. It layers a variety of activities, age groups, active and passive uses, and schedules to build an attractive and active public space. The design for the Park creates a new focal entry point, a circulation pattern, an arrangement of activity spaces, and other necessary features such restrooms, storage, tables, chairs, benches, bike racks, and portable play items.

The suggested program matrix (page 28 -31) includes a variety of daily, weekly, monthly , and annual events with seasonal offerings such as musical performances, specialty markets, lawn game tournaments, chili cook-offs, Paesano Days, Library programs, and more.

Construction costs are estimated at $8-$10 million, which exceeds the existing $2.5 million budget, and staff is seeking additional funding to begin engineering and construction of the plan.

The ORLP is a National Park Service (NPS) grant program focusing on communities with little to no access to nearby, publicly available, outdoor recreation opportunities in urban areas. The program funds the acquisition or development of new parks and substantial park renovations in economically disadvantaged cities or towns of at least 30,000 people. Use of this grant source will require the City to ensure that South City Park remain an outdoor recreation use area into perpetuity.

ORLP includes two competitive processes. California’s Department of Parks and Recreation reviews applications, selects finalists, and then forwards the finalists to the National Park Service for a nationwide review. Applications are due December 15, 2022 , and the estimated award date is January 1, 2024. The application will request approximately $ 3.5 million to implement phase one of construction, which could include features such as the playground, pickleball courts, flex lawn, entry plaza , and youth area. Staff anticipates needing additional funding sources for the remaining project elements that will be considered by the Council at a future meeting.

Environmental Review

Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, per Sections 15301(d) – Existing Facilities, 15302(C) – Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303(d & e) - New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures. Class 1 exemptions include the minor alteration of existing public structures and facilities. Class 2 exemptions consists of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. Class 3 exemptions consist of construction and location of new small facilities and equipment, or conversion of existing structures. The existing park will be renovated to meet public recreational needs with modern accessible amenities that meet public safety standards. The project will be located on the same site, will have the same purpose and capacity, and will result in a negligible expansio n of use. The action area does not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources and the project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

If the City receives a grant, the National Park Service will conduct a coordinated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) review with the City. No further action is required at this time.

Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Grant Application - December 6, 2022 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and Park Report to Redding City Council December 1, 2022
Re: 9.6(a)--Approve Concept Plan & Authorize Grant Application for South City Park Page 4

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel sec ure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
Project for Public Spaces Final Report
South City Park CEQA NOE
Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Grant Application - December 6, 2022 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and Park

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve and authorize the following actions related to the Community Development Block Grant Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program to assist with the South City Park Redevelopment Project:
(1) Adopt Resolution accepting a Section 108 Program Loan, pledging the City of Redding’s general fund ($240,000) as security, and authorizing the City Manager to execute a United State s Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 108 Contract, Note, and related documents containing that pledge;
(2) Adopt Resolution approving the 19th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023 - 060 appropriating $2,698,000 for the revised Section 108 Program funding of the South City Park Project and establishing a Section 108 payment guarantee for Fiscal yea r 2023- 24;
(3) Find that applying for and accepting grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
(4) Find that applying for and accepting grant funding is exempt under the National Environmental Policy Act under Title 24 CFR 58.34(a)(3).

Fiscal Impact

The proposed amount of funds to be borrowed from the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Section 108 Loan Guarantee Program (Section 108 ) is $2,458,000 for the South City Park Project (Project) . It is proposed that the funds will be drawn down in five installments. Each installment is charged a two percent processing fee plus $70. The amount of interest charged on the overall balance o f the funds is based on the Three-month Treasury Bill Rate plus 35 basis points or presently, about 5.675 percent. Repayment is based on a 20 -year loan term. Each year, interest only payments will be paid quarterly with a principal payment due in August of eac h year. Based on the most recent calculation by the Finance Department, t he highest annual payment, taking into consideration both interest and principal is approximately $240,000.

MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.2(c)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(c)-Consider adopting Resolution for the Community Development Block Grant Section 108 Guaranteed Loan.

Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Approve Funding Changes - November 1, 2022 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and Report to Redding City Council November 2, 2023
Re: 4.2(c)--Adopt Resolutions for CDBG Section 108 Guaranteed Loan Page 2

The City of Redding (City) is also required to provide collateral for th e loan. It is requested that the City set-aside General Fund dollars as security for the loan . This “Pledge” must be placed into the City’s budget year -after-year, for the 20 -year loan term, as a line item. The risk to the City’s General Fund is low as the City has been an entitlement jurisdiction , receiving annual CDBG funding allocations, for more than 40 years.

Each year the CDBG Section 108 payment will be included in the Annual Action Plan as a project. Payment of the Section 108 Loan will decrease t he amount of CDBG funds available to other infrastructure projects by the amount of the annual payment.

The Section 108 draws will be done on a reimbursement basis. The initial draw should be received within 45 days of request and subsequent draws should be received in seven days.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the terms of the CDBG Section 108. Not accepting the proposed terms will jeopardize the ability of the City to complete the South City Park Renovation Pro ject’s current scope . Either the scope of the Project would need to be substantially reduced, or the Project may not proceed altogether, depending on other grant funding earmarked for the Project.

Background/Analysis

In September 2019, as part of the B lock 7 North Block D evelopment Agreement approval, staff was authorized to apply for a Section 108 loan in the amount of $3,500,000. In August 2022, the Council approved the Section 108 financing terms and conditions and adopted Resolution No. 2022-085, authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary documents or contracts to obtain the loan. However, in November 2022, the CDBG Section 108 loan funds via Resolution No. 2022-115 were re-appropriated to the Project.

In September 2023 , the City’s Housing Division submitted a revised Section 108 application in the amount of $2,458,000 to fund the Project . As part of the Section 108 loan process, a resolution must be considered by Council. If the Section 108 Loan and noted terms are approved by Council, staff will send the Resolution and related documents to HUD . HUD will review the documents and confirm the funding commitment and interest rate calculations. Once approved, HUD will forward the Section 108 Loan agreement and associated documents back to the City for City Manager signature.

Environmental Review

Applying for and accepting funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

Under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), administrative and managemen t activities such as applying for and accepting funding are considered exempt activities.

Site specific environmental studies are in progress for South City Park Redevelopment Project, and CEQA/NEPA determinations will be made prior to executing any construction contracts.

Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Approve Funding Changes - November 1, 2022 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and Report to Redding City Council November 2, 2023
Re: 4.2(c)--Adopt Resolutions for CDBG Section 108 Guaranteed Loan Page 3

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

• Economic Development- “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”

Attachments
^Resolution - Section 108
^Resolution - Budget
Previous Staff Report - August 2, 2022 item no. 9.2(c) --Consider Agreements and adopt four Resolutions for the Block 7 North Block Development
Previous Staff Report November 1, 2022 item no. 4.6(c) --Approve Funding Changes for South City Park and Block 7 Projects
Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - Approve Funding Changes - November 1, 2022 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution appropriating Park In-Lieu and

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the sole source and procurement of Mannington [Retroscope 83638] Tile Carpeting to enhance, upgrade, and match the flooring at the City of Redding City Hall within the specifications for Public Works projects as authorized by Pu blic Contract Code Section 3400(c)(2).

Fiscal Impact

Standardizing carpet for the City of Redding City Hall (City Hall) will not impact the General Fund.

Alternative Action

The City Council could decline to approve the sole source and procurement of Mannington [Retroscope 83638] Tile Carpeting and provide staff with alternate direction.

Background/Analysis

With the exception of select areas, City Hall has not replaced or upgraded the flooring in most offices and common areas since 2000. While carpet warranties may last 15 years, the typical lifespan of commercial carpet in office settings is only about five to seven years. After 24 years, throughout City Hall, the existing carpet is worn and in need of replacement.

Staff has addressed manageable flooring areas and projects, including 9,775 square feet of Luxury Vinyl Tile planks that were installed in the stairwells and common areas for $130,000 in 2021. Also, in 2023, the Building Maintenance Division replaced the carpet in the Redding Police Depart ment’s Investigations Division , utilizing the Mannington [Retroscope 83638] product. This particular carpet was chosen as a durable, neutral and attractive style that would hold appeal for many years. The carpet material is a 6,6 yarn, meaning it has double strands of MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.6(b)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(b)--Authorize the sole source and procurement of Mannington Retroscope 83638 Tile Carpeting
Travis Menne, Director of
Community Services
Packet Pg. 119
Report to Redding City Council April 29, 2024
Re: 4.6(b)--Authorize the sole source and procurement of Mannington [Retroscope 83638] Tile Carpeting Page 2

carbon atoms embedded in the nylon fibers for strength, which exceeds industry standards and means it should last much longer than the existing carpet with high resiliency to compression and static resistance.

Staff proposes to use the same carpet throughout the building for all locations where the Building Maintenance Division performs or contracts for future carpet installations. Using the same material will make repairs and replacements easier as well as keep a uniform aesthetic wherever possible. Utilizing the same carpet product will also keep the building on the same replacement schedule. The carpet is designed to last for 20 years under harsh conditions and comes with a 20 -year warranty. Furthermore, t he proposed carpet is also manufactured as a tile system that is easily replaced in small sections when damaged or severely stained.

Replacement of the worn and damaged carpeting will improve public perception in addition to helping prevent trip and fall incidents.

Environmental Review

This activity is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work and plan in the City of Redding.”

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Packet Pg. 120

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Resolution proclaiming May 5 -6, 2024, as California Peace Officers' Memorial Day ; May 16, 2024, as Shasta County Peace Officers' Memorial Day ; and May 12 -18, 2024, as National Police Week in the City of Redding.

Fiscal Impact

There is no fiscal impact. Any Redding Police Department (Police Department) staff involved will be working regularly scheduled shifts or working during personal time.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could choose to not recognize California Peace Officers’ Memorial Day, Shasta County Peace Officers’ Memorial Day, and/or National Police Week.

Background/Analysis

The Police Department requests the Council adopt the attached Resolution proclaiming May 5-6, 2024, as California Peace Officers’ Memorial Day s; May 16, 202 4, as Shasta County Peace Officers’ Memorial Day; and May 12 through 18, 2024, as National Police Week.

As of April 2, 2024 , there were 30 law enforcement line of duty deaths in the United States.

According to the Officer Down Memorial Page, there were 136 line of duty deaths in the United States in 2023, 7 of which were in California. This year 30 officers have already lost their lives in the line of duty.

To honor law enforcement officers slain in the line of duty, Congress has proclaimed the week of May 12 through 18, 2024, as National Police Week.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.9(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.9(a)--Resolution regarding California Peace Officers' Memorial Days Brian Barner, Chief of Police
Packet Pg. 121
Report to Redding City Council April 29, 2024
Re: 4.9(a)--Resolution re California Peace Officers' Memorial Days Page 2

Each year, the Shasta County Peace Officer’s Memorial Committee conducts a memorial ceremony. The ceremony is held in honor of the officers killed in the line of duty over the history of Shasta County ; to da te, there have been 16 deaths with no local fatalities in 202 3. The ceremony will be held at the front steps of the former Shasta County Courthouse, 1500 Court Street, Redding, at noon on May 16, 2024.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined u nder the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
Packet Pg. 122
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING PROCLAIMING MAY 5 THROUGH MAY 6 , 2024, AS “CALIFORNIA
PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL DAY S;” MAY 16, 2024, AS “SHASTA COUNTY PEACE OFFICERS’ MEMORIAL DAY;” AND MAY 12
THROUGH MAY 18, 20 24, AS “NATIONAL POLICE WEEK” IN THE

CITY OF REDDING

WHEREAS, May 5-6, 2024, have been designated by the California State Legislature as California Peace Officers’ Memorial Days; and

WHEREAS, the week of May 12 through May 18, 2024, has been designated “National Police Week” by both an Act of Congress and Presidential Proclamation; and

WHEREAS, in 2023, 136 officers were killed nationwide, with 7 California officers being killed in the line of duty; and

WHEREAS, the safety of our citizenry greatly depends on the services of the Redding Police Department, the Shasta County Sheriff’s Department, and the Anderson Police Department, as well as the many county, state and federal agencies that make up the law enforcement community in Shasta County;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding hereby proclaims May 5-6, 2024, as “California Peace Officers’ Memorial Days;” May 16, 2024, as “Shasta County Peace Officers’ Memorial Day;” and May 12 through 18, 2024, as “National Police Memorial Week” in the City of Redding.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council urges residents and civic organizations to salute this City’s dedicated law enforcement professionals by attending the Shasta County Peace Officers’ Memorial, and directs that all City of Redding flags be flown at half-staff on May 16, 2024, in honor of the peace officers killed in the line of duty during 2023.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

___________________________________
TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

______________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 123
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.9(a)--Resolution re California Peace Officers' Memorial Days)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Accept Bid Schedule No. 5265 (Job No. 2644), Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Traffic Signal, awarded to Crosspoint General Engineering, as satisfactorily complete, with a final cost of $484,864.16.

Fiscal Impact

Citywide Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) funding in the amount of $575,000 was approved for this project for Fiscal Year 2022 -23. The total project cost, including surveying, design, bidding, construction, field engineering, inspection, and contract administration, is $484,864.16.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the project as satisfactorily complete, and advise staff on how to proceed.

Background/Analysis

Crosspoint General Engineering has completed all items of work on the Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Signal as of December 19, 2023, which was within the contract time frame. The project warranty period expires one year from the completion date.

At its meeting of May 3, 2022, the Council awarded a construction contract to Crosspoint General Engineering of Palo Cedro, for $337,500 and approved a $34,000 construction contingency fund. Also authorized was $87,000 for contract administration and construction inspection fees and $58,000 for project development costs, and the City Manager was authorized to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $15,000, for a total authorized amount of $531,500. Project development costs include engineering, environmental, and cons ultant services. During construction, there were three change orders in the amount of $9,364.16, leaving a balance of $24,635.84 in the contingency fund. The final project cost was $484,864.16.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Project Acceptance, Bid Schedule No. 5265, Job No. 2644, Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Traffic Signal
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 124
Report to Redding City Council April 30, 2024
Re: 4.11(a)--Project Acceptance, Bid Schedule No. 5265, Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Traffic Signal Page 2

Cost Summary
Awarded Amounts Actual Cost
Project Development Costs $58,000 $58,000
Construction Contract +
Contingency $371,500
Construction Contract + Contract
Change Orders $346,864.16
Contract Administration &
Inspection $87,000 $80,000
Additional City Manager Authority $15,000 $0
Total $531,500 $484.864.16

The project involved the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Bechelli Lane and Loma Vista Avenue. Additional items of work at the intersection included installation of internally illuminated street name signs, radar detection, and pedestrian push buttons providing a fully operational traffic signal.

Environmental Review

This action, project acceptance, is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). On May 3, 2022, the Coun cil determined that the Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Signal Project is categorically exempt from review under CEQA, pursuant to Section 15301(c) – Existing Facilities and Section 15303(d) – New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures. No further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 125

CITY OF REDDINGLOCATION MAPEXHIBIT APUBLIC WORKSDEPARTMENT

BECHELLI LN

LOMA VISTA DR

RAFAEL ST

JOAQUIN AVE

CHERYL DR

LOMA VISTA DR
DEE ST

TRAVERSE ST

PROJECTLOCATION

BECHELLI LANE/LOMA VISTATRAFFIC SIGNAL
Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(a)--Project Acceptance, Bid Schedule No. 5265, Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Traffic Signal)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Schedule No. 52 65 (Job No. 26 44), Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Traffic Signal (Project):
(1) Award to Crosspoint General Engineering in the amount of $337,500; (2) Approve an additional $87,000 to cover the cost of contract administration and inspection fees;
(3) Approve $34,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (4) Approve $58,000 for project development costs;
(5) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases, in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts, up to a total of $15,000; and (6) Find that the Project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act per Section 15301(c) – Existing Facilities and Section 15303(d) – New Construction or Conversion of Existing Structures.

Fiscal Impact

The Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Traffic Signal Project is being funded by the Citywide Transportation Impact Fee (TIF) Program. Project cost components ar e estimated, and some shifting of the funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $ 58,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $ 371,500
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $ 87,000
Additional City Manager Authority $ 15,000
Total Project Costs $ 531,500
Project Budget $ 575,000

MEETING DATE: May 3, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Bid Schedule No. 5265 (Job No. 2644), Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Traffic Signal Project
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Project Acceptance, Bid Schedule No. 5265, Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Traffic Signal) Report to Redding City Council April 24, 2022
Re: 4.11(d)--Award BS No. 5265, Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Page 2

Alternative Action

The City Council may choose to not award the projec t, in which case, traffic signal mitigation measures for River Crossing Marketplace (RCM) development would not be constructed. The RCM Project is currently under construction and not installing this traffic signal could jeopardize future occupancy of the development.

Background/Analysis

The R CM development w ill result in additional transportation impacts on the surrounding roadways. One of the mitigation measures identified during project entitlements to alleviate these impacts includes the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Bechelli Lane and Loma Vista Avenue. Additional items of work at the intersection include installation of internally illuminated street name signs, radar detection, and pedestrian push buttons providing a fully operational traffic signal. The RCM project has deposited with the City of Redding (City) its fair share portion of the project cost based on the traffic impact analysis report , and the remaining costs will be paid by the City’s TIF program.

Attached is a tabulation of bids opened on April 14, 202 2. The low bi d in the amount of $337,500 was received from Crosspoint General Engineering , of Palo Cedro , California. The engineer’s estimate was $357,500. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $ 58,000. Project development costs include e ngineering, environmental, and consultant services.

Staff has determined that the project qualifies as Categorically Exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 1530 1 and 15303. The project area does not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources, and the project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Bid Tab
Location Map
Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 128
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(a)--Project Acceptance, Bid Schedule No. 5265, Bechelli Lane/Loma Vista Traffic Signal)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Negotiation No. 5461, Old Alturas Road Improvement Project:
(1) Award to Lamb Unlimited General Engineering in the amount of $1,033,397.75; (2) Approve an additional $168,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; (3) Approve $60,000 for project development costs;
(4) Approve $104,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (5) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $50,000; and (6) Find that the Project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section s 15301 - Existing Facilities, 15302 - Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures.

Fiscal Impact

The Old Alturas Road Improvement Project is being funded by the Water, Storm Drain and Streets Divisions. These Divisions have sufficient budget for this project and its funding will not impact other activities or projects.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $60,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $1,137,397.75
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $168,000
Additional City Manager Authority $50,000
Total Project Costs $1,415,397.75

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Award Bid Negotiation No. 5461 (Job Order No. 2438) Old Alturas Road Improvements Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 129
Report to Redding City Council April 30, 2024
Re: 4.11(b)--Award BN No. 5461 Old Alturas Road Improvements Project Page 2

Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action

City Council may choose not to award the bid for t he project and provide staff with alternate direction. If the project is not awarded, then the current Old Alturas Road Bridge Over Churn Creek Project will not conform to the existing roadway and it will leave a section of water, storm drain, sidewalk and travel lanes unimproved.

Background/Analysis

This project will improve Old Alturas Road from 200 feet east of the Old Alturas Road Bridge to Edgewood Drive. Im provements include widening and overlaying the street, installing curb gutter and sidewalk, adding bike lanes, replacing water main s, adding storm drainage and a walking trail on the north side, and installing street lights and underground electrical.

Attached is a tabulation of bids received and opened on April 9, 2024, for construction of the project. The low bid in the amount of $1,033,397.75 was received from Lamb Unlimited General Engineering. The engineer's estimate was $ 920,000. Total project develo pment costs for this project are estimated to be $ 60,000. Project development costs include engineering and environmental for the project.

Environmental Review

Staff has reviewed the project and determined that it is categorically exempt from review unde r the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities, 15302- Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Class 1 exemptions include the minor alteration of existing p ublic structures and facilities. Class 2 exemptions consists of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. Class 3 exemptions consist of construction and location of new small facilities and equipment, or conversion of existing structures. The existing roadway will be improved to accommodate both vehicles and non -motorized traffic. The project will be located within the right -of-way and the project will re sult in a negligible expansion of use, as the project does not increase vehicle capacity. The action area has been reviewed and it does not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
^Bid Tab
^Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 130
PROJECTLOCATIONCITY OF REDDINGLOCATION MAPEXHIBIT AOLD ALTURAS IMPOVEMENTSPUBLIC WORKSDEPARTMENTX:\Projects\Old Alturas Road Improvements\Design\Plans\Drawings\Old Alturas Improvements 2.DWG, Exhibit Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(b)--Award BN No. 5461 Old Alturas Road Improvements Project) BID TABULATION FOR:

OLD ALTURAS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Bid Schedule No.: 5461

ENGINEER'S EST
4/9/2024 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Prepare Storm Water Pollution LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,888.00 $2,888.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 2 Implement Storm Water Pollution LS 1 $18,000.00 $18,000.00 $6,320.00 $6,320.00 $14,127.04 $14,127.04 3 Traffic Control LS 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $94,150.00 $94,150.00 $79,050.00 $79,050.00 4 Construction Area Sign LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $4,920.00 $4,920.00 $3,600.00 $3,600.00 5 Project Funding Sign EA 1 $400.00 $400.00 $3,305.00 $3,305.00 $1,750.00 $1,750.00 6 Clear and Grub LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $75,115.00 $75,115.00 $89,922.75 $89,922.75 7 Curb and Gutter (6") LF 616 $81.17 $50,000.72 $62.00 $38,192.00 $33.07 $20,371.12 8 Sidewalk (4" PCC) SF 2713 $15.49 $42,024.37 $14.25 $38,660.25 $6.90 $18,719.70 9 Driveway (Residential) SF 645 $22.35 $14,415.75 $23.50 $15,157.50 $9.77 $6,301.65 10 Excavation (Unclassified) CY 515 $105.00 $54,075.00 $55.25 $28,453.75 $162.87 $83,878.05 11 Remove Asphalt Concrete SF 4500 $2.80 $12,600.00 $1.90 $8,550.00 $1.87 $8,415.00 12 Asphalt Concrete TON 750 $155.00 $116,250.00 $205.00 $153,750.00 $202.55 $151,912.50 13 Pavement Fabric SY 2800 $6.00 $16,800.00 $6.80 $19,040.00 $4.37 $12,236.00 14 Cold Mill Asphalt Concrete SF 2150 $2.70 $5,805.00 $7.00 $15,050.00 $3.37 $7,245.50 15 Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 675 $85.00 $57,375.00 $73.75 $49,781.25 $136.17 $91,914.75 16 Shoulder Backing LF 550 $25.00 $13,750.00 $17.25 $9,487.50 $31.91 $17,550.50 17 Storm Drain Pipe (24" HDPE) LF 49 $175.00 $8,575.00 $289.75 $14,197.75 $280.78 $13,758.22 18 Storm Drain Pipe (36" HDPE) LF 638 $225.00 $143,550.00 $215.00 $137,170.00 $205.67 $131,217.46 19 Catch Basin No. 3 EA 1 $9,300.00 $9,300.00 $8,815.00 $8,815.00 $7,846.70 $7,846.70 20 Manhole (Storm Drain, Type 1-5') EA 1 $7,600.00 $7,600.00 $19,985.00 $19,985.00 $18,391.95 $18,391.95 21 Manhole (Storm Drain, Type 2-5') EA 1 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $8,355.00 $8,355.00 $8,167.27 $8,167.27 22 Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 1 $13,500.00 $13,500.00 $10,965.00 $10,965.00 $6,476.73 $6,476.73 23 Replace Water Service (1") EA 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $9,255.00 $9,255.00 $10,984.88 $10,984.88 24 Water Main (8" DIP) LF 106 $250.00 $26,500.00 $179.00 $18,974.00 $467.71 $49,577.26 25 Water Main (12" DIP) LF 482 $305.00 $147,010.00 $244.00 $117,608.00 $193.00 $93,026.00 26 Valve (12" Butterfly) EA 2 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 $9,940.00 $19,880.00 $4,328.60 $8,657.20 27 Valve (6" Resilient Wedge Gate) EA 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $4,305.00 $4,305.00 $2,543.66 $2,543.66 28 Valve (8" Resilient Wedge Gate) EA 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $5,160.00 $5,160.00 $2,731.77 $2,731.77 29 Abandon Valve EA 4 $750.00 $3,000.00 $1,390.00 $5,560.00 $576.26 $2,305.04 30 Adjust Valve EA 3 $650.00 $1,950.00 $735.00 $2,205.00 $1,283.40 $3,850.20 31 Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 110 $10.00 $1,100.00 $27.00 $2,970.00 $35.00 $3,850.00 32 Traffic Stripe (6" Thermoplastic) LF 3363 $2.00 $6,726.00 $3.25 $10,929.75 $2.10 $7,062.30 33 Traffic Stripe (8" Thermoplastic) LF 198 $3.00 $594.00 $8.00 $1,584.00 $6.00 $1,188.00 34 Pavement Marker EA 75 $6.00 $450.00 $24.00 $1,800.00 $15.50 $1,162.50 35 Relocate Sign EA 1 $450.00 $450.00 $830.00 $830.00 $459.53 $459.53 36 Conduit (2" PVC) LF 42 $55.00 $2,310.00 $115.00 $4,830.00 $308.42 $12,953.64 Lamb Unlimited General
Engineering Eddie Axner Construction, Inc

Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(b)--Award BN No. 5461 Old Alturas Road Improvements Project) BID TABULATION FOR:

OLD ALTURAS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Bid Schedule No.: 5461

ENGINEER'S EST
4/9/2024 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL Lamb Unlimited General
Engineering Eddie Axner Construction, Inc
37 Conductor (# 6) LF 172 $8.00 $1,376.00 $14.50 $2,494.00 $6.29 $1,081.88 38 Pullbox (3E) EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $3,170.00 $3,170.00 $1,484.49 $1,484.49 39 Street Light (35' Standard and LED EA 4 $6,000.00 $24,000.00 $7,525.00 $30,100.00 $5,885.35 $23,541.40 40 Relocate Mailbox EA 1 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,225.00 $1,225.00 $2,439.94 $2,439.94 41 Adjust Monument EA 3 $750.00 $2,250.00 $2,230.00 $6,690.00 $979.93 $2,939.79 42 Remove Tree EA 9 $1,250.00 $11,250.00 $2,110.00 $18,990.00 $1,517.60 $13,658.40 43 Biologist LS 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $2,530.00 $2,530.00 $990.00 $990.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $886,986.84 $1,033,397.75 $1,040,340.77

Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(b)--Award BN No. 5461 Old Alturas Road Improvements Project) BID TABULATION FOR:

OLD ALTURAS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Bid Schedule No.: 5461
4/9/2024

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 Prepare Storm Water Pollution LS 1
2 Implement Storm Water Pollution LS 1
3 Traffic Control LS 1
4 Construction Area Sign LS 1
5 Project Funding Sign EA 1
6 Clear and Grub LS 1
7 Curb and Gutter (6") LF 616
8 Sidewalk (4" PCC) SF 2713
9 Driveway (Residential) SF 645
10 Excavation (Unclassified) CY 515
11 Remove Asphalt Concrete SF 4500
12 Asphalt Concrete TON 750
13 Pavement Fabric SY 2800
14 Cold Mill Asphalt Concrete SF 2150
15 Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 675
16 Shoulder Backing LF 550
17 Storm Drain Pipe (24" HDPE) LF 49
18 Storm Drain Pipe (36" HDPE) LF 638
19 Catch Basin No. 3 EA 1
20 Manhole (Storm Drain, Type 1-5') EA 1
21 Manhole (Storm Drain, Type 2-5') EA 1
22 Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 1
23 Replace Water Service (1") EA 1
24 Water Main (8" DIP) LF 106
25 Water Main (12" DIP) LF 482
26 Valve (12" Butterfly) EA 2
27 Valve (6" Resilient Wedge Gate) EA 1
28 Valve (8" Resilient Wedge Gate) EA 1
29 Abandon Valve EA 4
30 Adjust Valve EA 3
31 Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 110
32 Traffic Stripe (6" Thermoplastic) LF 3363
33 Traffic Stripe (8" Thermoplastic) LF 198
34 Pavement Marker EA 75
35 Relocate Sign EA 1
36 Conduit (2" PVC) LF 42

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
$2,500.00 $2,500.00 $4,186.00 $4,186.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $9,935.00 $9,935.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $145,000.00 $145,000.00 $106,088.00 $106,088.00 $110,000.00 $110,000.00 $2,200.00 $2,200.00 $3,349.00 $3,349.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $1,200.00 $1,200.00 $1,495.00 $1,495.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $44,000.00 $44,000.00 $7,567.00 $7,567.00 $9,000.00 $9,000.00 $38.00 $23,408.00 $51.35 $31,631.60 $50.00 $30,800.00
$17.00 $46,121.00 $13.67 $37,086.71 $22.00 $59,686.00
$20.00 $12,900.00 $17.57 $11,332.65 $26.00 $16,770.00
$155.00 $79,825.00 $132.11 $68,036.65 $160.00 $82,400.00 $1.75 $7,875.00 $2.93 $13,185.00 $3.00 $13,500.00
$170.00 $127,500.00 $200.32 $150,240.00 $250.00 $187,500.00 $6.50 $18,200.00 $5.23 $14,644.00 $6.00 $16,800.00
$3.50 $7,525.00 $4.03 $8,664.50 $4.00 $8,600.00
$120.00 $81,000.00 $149.42 $100,858.50 $165.00 $111,375.00 $23.00 $12,650.00 $24.37 $13,403.50 $18.00 $9,900.00
$420.00 $20,580.00 $317.00 $15,533.00 $665.00 $32,585.00 $410.00 $261,580.00 $476.75 $304,166.50 $250.00 $159,500.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $7,214.00 $7,214.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $22,031.00 $22,031.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $24,046.00 $24,046.00 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 $16,700.00 $16,700.00 $8,798.00 $8,798.00 $7,000.00 $7,000.00 $4,200.00 $4,200.00 $15,298.00 $15,298.00 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $210.00 $22,260.00 $334.20 $35,425.20 $310.00 $32,860.00 $198.00 $95,436.00 $177.54 $85,574.28 $300.00 $144,600.00 $8,150.00 $16,300.00 $4,163.00 $8,326.00 $4,500.00 $9,000.00 $4,300.00 $4,300.00 $2,247.00 $2,247.00 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 $4,900.00 $4,900.00 $3,014.00 $3,014.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $575.00 $2,300.00 $738.00 $2,952.00 $2,000.00 $8,000.00 $1,150.00 $3,450.00 $1,177.00 $3,531.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $35.00 $3,850.00 $21.53 $2,368.30 $20.00 $2,200.00
$2.00 $6,726.00 $4.36 $14,662.68 $3.00 $10,089.00
$6.00 $1,188.00 $5.00 $990.00 $5.00 $990.00
$15.00 $1,125.00 $16.00 $1,200.00 $15.00 $1,125.00
$600.00 $600.00 $957.00 $957.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00
$64.00 $2,688.00 $75.00 $3,150.00 $300.00 $12,600.00
Stimpel-Wiebelhaus Associates,
Inc Axner Excavating, Inc. RTA Construction, Inc

Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(b)--Award BN No. 5461 Old Alturas Road Improvements Project) BID TABULATION FOR:

OLD ALTURAS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Bid Schedule No.: 5461
4/9/2024

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
37 Conductor (# 6) LF 172
38 Pullbox (3E) EA 1
39 Street Light (35' Standard and LED EA 4
40 Relocate Mailbox EA 1
41 Adjust Monument EA 3
42 Remove Tree EA 9
43 Biologist LS 1

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS

UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
Stimpel-Wiebelhaus Associates,
Inc Axner Excavating, Inc. RTA Construction, Inc
$15.00 $2,580.00 $17.94 $3,085.68 $20.00 $3,440.00
$1,780.00 $1,780.00 $3,361.00 $3,361.00 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 $8,500.00 $34,000.00 $10,417.00 $41,668.00 $10,000.00 $40,000.00 $2,400.00 $2,400.00 $1,077.00 $1,077.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $3,166.00 $9,498.00 $1,000.00 $3,000.00 $1,290.00 $11,610.00 $2,562.00 $23,058.00 $3,500.00 $31,500.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,077.25 $1,077.25 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $1,178,957.00 $1,226,012.00 $1,231,820.00

Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(b)--Award BN No. 5461 Old Alturas Road Improvements Project) BID TABULATION FOR:

OLD ALTURAS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Bid Schedule No.: 5461
4/9/2024

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 Prepare Storm Water Pollution LS 1
2 Implement Storm Water Pollution LS 1
3 Traffic Control LS 1
4 Construction Area Sign LS 1
5 Project Funding Sign EA 1
6 Clear and Grub LS 1
7 Curb and Gutter (6") LF 616
8 Sidewalk (4" PCC) SF 2713
9 Driveway (Residential) SF 645
10 Excavation (Unclassified) CY 515
11 Remove Asphalt Concrete SF 4500
12 Asphalt Concrete TON 750
13 Pavement Fabric SY 2800
14 Cold Mill Asphalt Concrete SF 2150
15 Aggregate Base (Class 2) CY 675
16 Shoulder Backing LF 550
17 Storm Drain Pipe (24" HDPE) LF 49
18 Storm Drain Pipe (36" HDPE) LF 638
19 Catch Basin No. 3 EA 1
20 Manhole (Storm Drain, Type 1-5') EA 1
21 Manhole (Storm Drain, Type 2-5') EA 1
22 Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 1
23 Replace Water Service (1") EA 1
24 Water Main (8" DIP) LF 106
25 Water Main (12" DIP) LF 482
26 Valve (12" Butterfly) EA 2
27 Valve (6" Resilient Wedge Gate) EA 1
28 Valve (8" Resilient Wedge Gate) EA 1
29 Abandon Valve EA 4
30 Adjust Valve EA 3
31 Pavement Marking (Thermoplastic) SF 110
32 Traffic Stripe (6" Thermoplastic) LF 3363
33 Traffic Stripe (8" Thermoplastic) LF 198
34 Pavement Marker EA 75
35 Relocate Sign EA 1
36 Conduit (2" PVC) LF 42

AVERAGES

UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE
$3,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,875.00 $2,875.00 $2,806.13 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $25,105.00 $25,105.00 $11,310.88 $78,000.00 $78,000.00 $107,000.00 $107,000.00 $275,367.00 $275,367.00 $124,331.88 $4,325.00 $4,325.00 $2,800.00 $2,800.00 $2,530.00 $2,530.00 $3,528.00 $3,250.00 $3,250.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,380.00 $1,380.00 $2,172.50 $57,850.00 $57,850.00 $23,500.00 $23,500.00 $14,007.00 $14,007.00 $40,120.22 $76.00 $46,816.00 $85.00 $52,360.00 $41.00 $25,256.00 $54.55 $30.00 $81,390.00 $24.00 $65,112.00 $18.00 $48,834.00 $18.23 $60.00 $38,700.00 $20.00 $12,900.00 $21.00 $13,545.00 $24.73 $98.00 $50,470.00 $185.00 $95,275.00 $127.00 $65,405.00 $134.40 $12.00 $54,000.00 $2.00 $9,000.00 $2.00 $9,000.00 $3.43 $225.00 $168,750.00 $165.00 $123,750.00 $208.00 $156,000.00 $203.23 $6.00 $16,800.00 $3.66 $10,248.00 $4.00 $11,200.00 $5.32 $6.50 $13,975.00 $2.65 $5,697.50 $5.44 $11,696.00 $4.56 $42.00 $28,350.00 $170.00 $114,750.00 $152.00 $102,600.00 $126.04 $56.00 $30,800.00 $22.50 $12,375.00 $14.00 $7,700.00 $25.88 $300.00 $14,700.00 $550.00 $26,950.00 $801.00 $39,249.00 $452.94 $273.00 $174,174.00 $440.00 $280,720.00 $384.00 $244,992.00 $331.80 $10,850.00 $10,850.00 $5,950.00 $5,950.00 $5,700.00 $5,700.00 $7,609.46 $13,550.00 $13,550.00 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $13,830.00 $13,830.00 $15,348.49 $13,000.00 $13,000.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $15,377.00 $15,377.00 $12,493.16 $14,500.00 $14,500.00 $11,000.00 $11,000.00 $19,598.00 $19,598.00 $11,879.72 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $14,886.00 $14,886.00 $12,765.49 $300.00 $31,800.00 $640.00 $67,840.00 $470.00 $49,820.00 $363.86 $340.00 $163,880.00 $325.00 $156,650.00 $308.00 $148,456.00 $260.69 $7,100.00 $14,200.00 $6,500.00 $13,000.00 $11,046.00 $22,092.00 $6,965.95 $4,900.00 $4,900.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,715.00 $6,715.00 $4,063.83 $5,700.00 $5,700.00 $5,750.00 $5,750.00 $7,653.00 $7,653.00 $4,801.10 $1,350.00 $5,400.00 $1,200.00 $4,800.00 $1,487.00 $5,948.00 $1,164.53 $3,225.00 $9,675.00 $1,500.00 $4,500.00 $2,177.00 $6,531.00 $1,530.93 $25.00 $2,750.00 $18.00 $1,980.00 $41.00 $4,510.00 $27.82 $3.50 $11,770.50 $2.75 $9,248.25 $3.00 $10,089.00 $3.00 $6.50 $1,287.00 $4.00 $792.00 $7.00 $1,386.00 $5.94
$21.50 $1,612.50 $13.00 $975.00 $18.00 $1,350.00 $17.25 $2,265.00 $2,265.00 $750.00 $750.00 $1,426.00 $1,426.00 $1,035.94 $158.00 $6,636.00 $170.00 $7,140.00 $276.00 $11,592.00 $183.30 S. T. Rhoades
Construction, Inc. J.F. Shea Construction, Inc.SnL Group, Inc

Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(b)--Award BN No. 5461 Old Alturas Road Improvements Project) BID TABULATION FOR:

OLD ALTURAS ROAD IMPROVEMENTS
Bid Schedule No.: 5461
4/9/2024

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
37 Conductor (# 6) LF 172
38 Pullbox (3E) EA 1
39 Street Light (35' Standard and LED EA 4
40 Relocate Mailbox EA 1
41 Adjust Monument EA 3
42 Remove Tree EA 9
43 Biologist LS 1

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS

AVERAGES

UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE
S. T. Rhoades
Construction, Inc. J.F. Shea Construction, Inc.SnL Group, Inc $19.50 $3,354.00 $17.00 $2,924.00 $70.00 $12,040.00 $22.53 $4,450.00 $4,450.00 $2,750.00 $2,750.00 $5,184.00 $5,184.00 $3,209.94 $7,670.00 $30,680.00 $8,500.00 $34,000.00 $10,662.00 $42,648.00 $8,644.92 $8,250.00 $8,250.00 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $2,564.00 $2,564.00 $2,619.49 $3,288.00 $9,864.00 $1,400.00 $4,200.00 $1,490.00 $4,470.00 $1,881.74 $4,700.00 $42,300.00 $700.00 $6,300.00 $3,082.00 $27,738.00 $2,432.70 $1,400.00 $1,400.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 $1,380.00 $1,380.00 $2,422.16 $1,319,424.00 $1,335,986.75 $1,499,724.00 $1,233,207.78

Attachment: ^Bid Tab (4.11(b)--Award BN No. 5461 Old Alturas Road Improvements Project) Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: ^Notice of Exemption (4.11(b)--Award BN No. 5461 Old Alturas Road Improvements Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Negotiation No. 5462 (Job No. 2680), Athens Area Water Improvements Project:
(1) Award to Eddie Axner Construction, Inc., in the amount of $4,694,746.24; (2) Approve an additional $518,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; (3) Approve $340,000 for project development costs;
(4) Approve $470,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (5) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either th e construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $100,000; and (6) Find that the Project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act , pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities , 153 02- Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures.

Fiscal Impact

The Athens Area Water Improvements Project (Project) is being funded by the Water Utility Division. The Water Utility has a sufficient budge t for this project and its funding will not impact other activities or projects.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $340,000
Construction Contract + Contingency $5,164,746.24
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $518,000
Additional City Manager Authority $100,000
Total Project Costs $6,122,746.24

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Award Bid Negotiation No. 5462 (Job Order No. 2680) Athens Area Water Improvements Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 139
Report to Redding City Council April 30, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Award BN No. 5462 Athens Area Water Improvements Page 2

Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action

City Council may choose not to award the bid for t he project and provide staff with alternate direction. Without this project, there is greater potential for increased maintenance costs, a decrease in reliability and an increased risk of water main breaks for City of Redding (City) customers.

Background/Analysis

The City's water system includes approximately 2.98 million feet (565 miles) of conveyance and distribution pipeline s of various pipe mate rials and sizes ranging from 1-inch to 48 -inch.

Assessments of the City’s water distribution system indicate that the older steel and cast -iron pipelines have had the highest rates of failure in recent years . To reduce pipeline failures and maintenance costs and to improve reliability to its customers, the Water Utility has focused on replacing older steel and cast -iron piping in areas where breaks have occurred. This project will replace over 14,000 feet of aging steel and cast -iron water mains that were i nstalled in the 1940s through 1960s. Th ese mains have reached the end of their service li fe and have had several breaks in recent years that the Water Utility has repaired . This project will replace the old steel and cast-iron piping with new polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and ductile iron piping to reduce future maintenance costs and provide reliable service in the area for the foreseeable future . Water services and fire hydrants in the area will also be replaced as part of the project.

Attached is a tabulatio n of bids received and opened on April 11, 2024, for construction of the project. The low bid in the amount of $ 4,694,746.24 was received from Eddie Axner Construction, Inc., of Redding, California. The engineer's estimate was $5,129,720. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $ 340,000. Project development costs include engineerin g, surveying, right -of-way, environmental, and consultant services for the project.

Environmental Review

Staff has determined that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under California Environmental Qual ity Act Guidelines , pursuant to Sections 15301 - Existing Facilities, 15302 – Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303 - New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures . Class 1 exemptions include the minor alteration of existing public structures and facilities. Class 2 exemptions consists of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose an d capacity. Class 3 exemptions consist of construction and location of new small facilities and equipment, or conversion of existing structures. The existing utilities will be replaced to provide reliable service that meets public health and safety standar ds. The project will be located in the right -of-way and will result in a negligible expansion of use. The action area does not have significant values for wildlife habitat or other environmental resources and the project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Packet Pg. 140
Report to Redding City Council April 30, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Award BN No. 5462 Athens Area Water Improvements Page 3

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
^Bid Tabulation
^Notice of Exemption
Packet Pg. 141

CITY OF REDDINGLOCATION MAPATHENS AREA WATERIMPROVEMENTS PROJECTPUBLIC WORKSDEPARTMENT

AREAPROJECTSOUTH STOLYMPUS AVELONDON AVEPARIS AVEWASHINGTON AVEROME AVEATHENS AVEATHENS AVELOCUST STCYPRESS AVE

PARK MARINA DR

SOUTH STSEQUOIA ST

SACRAMENTO RIVER
Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(c)--Award BN No. 5462 Athens Area Water Improvements) BID TABULATION FOR:

Athens Area Water Improvements
Bid Schedule No.: 5462
4/11/2024 UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Prepare Storm Water Pollution LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 2 Implement Storm Water Pollution LS 1 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $14,860.46 $14,860.46 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 3 Traffic Control LS 1 $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $378,480.00 $378,480.00 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 4 Construction Area Sign EA 14 $500.00 $7,000.00 $365.00 $5,110.00 $500.00 $7,000.00 5 Project Funding Sign EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 $1,700.00 $1,700.00 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 6 Trench Sheeting & Shoring LS 1 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $260,231.13 $260,231.13 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 7 Dewatering LS 1 $100,000.00 $100,000.00 $196,643.75 $196,643.75 $50,000.00 $50,000.00 8 Temporary Water Bypass Systems LS 1 $80,000.00 $80,000.00 $122,815.43 $122,815.43 $110,000.00 $110,000.00 9 Water (6" PVC, Slurry) LF 77 $210.00 $16,170.00 $872.80 $67,205.60 $465.00 $35,805.00 10 Water (8" PVC) LF 6315 $150.00 $947,250.00 $122.56 $773,966.40 $180.00 $1,136,700.00 11 Water (8" PVC, Slurry) LF 4674 $220.00 $1,028,280.00 $147.04 $687,264.96 $220.00 $1,028,280.00 12 Water (12" DIP, Slurry) LF 2975 $280.00 $833,000.00 $214.67 $638,643.25 $298.00 $886,550.00 13 Valve (6" Gate) EA 3 $3,000.00 $9,000.00 $2,393.64 $7,180.92 $2,000.00 $6,000.00 14 Valve (8" Gate) EA 52 $3,800.00 $197,600.00 $3,007.43 $156,386.36 $2,200.00 $114,400.00 15 Valve (12" Butterfly) EA 11 $6,300.00 $69,300.00 $4,880.05 $53,680.55 $4,500.00 $49,500.00 16 New Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 25 $13,000.00 $325,000.00 $12,334.93 $308,373.25 $12,000.00 $300,000.00 17 Water Service (1", Slurry) EA 69 $6,500.00 $448,500.00 $5,034.59 $347,386.71 $9,250.00 $638,250.00 18 Water Service (1") EA 130 $5,000.00 $650,000.00 $3,756.49 $488,343.70 $4,500.00 $585,000.00 19 Water Service (1-1/2", Slurry) EA 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 $28,561.77 $28,561.77 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 20 Water Service (2", Slurry) EA 2 $8,500.00 $17,000.00 $19,317.94 $38,635.88 $12,000.00 $24,000.00 21 Abandon Valve EA 36 $750.00 $27,000.00 $344.42 $12,399.12 $700.00 $25,200.00 22 Remove Valve EA 10 $1,000.00 $10,000.00 $1,327.54 $13,275.40 $1,800.00 $18,000.00 23 Remove Tree EA 2 $3,000.00 $6,000.00 $3,298.25 $6,596.50 $5,000.00 $10,000.00 24 Catch Basin #3 EA 2 $6,500.00 $13,000.00 $8,706.35 $17,412.70 $3,500.00 $7,000.00 25 Catch Basin #4 EA 1 $8,500.00 $8,500.00 $8,734.34 $8,734.34 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 26 Storm Drain (12" HDPE, Slurry) LF 66 $270.00 $17,820.00 $406.16 $26,806.56 $625.00 $41,250.00 27 Storm Drain (15" HDPE, Slurry) LF 46 $300.00 $13,800.00 $333.85 $15,357.10 $625.00 $28,750.00 28 Curb Ramp (Type A) SF 320 $50.00 $16,000.00 $39.67 $12,694.40 $40.00 $12,800.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $5,129,720.00 $4,694,746.24 $5,331,485.00

ENGINEER'S EST
Eddie Axner Construction,
Inc RTA Construction, Inc.

Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. Page 1 of 2Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(c)--Award BN No. 5462 Athens Area Water Improvements) BID TABULATION FOR:

Athens Area Water Improvements
Bid Schedule No.: 5462
4/11/2024

ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT QTY
1 Prepare Storm Water Pollution LS 1
2 Implement Storm Water Pollution LS 1
3 Traffic Control LS 1
4 Construction Area Sign EA 14
5 Project Funding Sign EA 1
6 Trench Sheeting & Shoring LS 1
7 Dewatering LS 1
8 Temporary Water Bypass Systems LS 1
9 Water (6" PVC, Slurry) LF 77
10 Water (8" PVC) LF 6315
11 Water (8" PVC, Slurry) LF 4674
12 Water (12" DIP, Slurry) LF 2975
13 Valve (6" Gate) EA 3
14 Valve (8" Gate) EA 52
15 Valve (12" Butterfly) EA 11
16 New Fire Hydrant Assembly EA 25
17 Water Service (1", Slurry) EA 69
18 Water Service (1") EA 130
19 Water Service (1-1/2", Slurry) EA 1
20 Water Service (2", Slurry) EA 2
21 Abandon Valve EA 36
22 Remove Valve EA 10
23 Remove Tree EA 2
24 Catch Basin #3 EA 2
25 Catch Basin #4 EA 1
26 Storm Drain (12" HDPE, Slurry) LF 66
27 Storm Drain (15" HDPE, Slurry) LF 46
28 Curb Ramp (Type A) SF 320

TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS

AVERAGES

UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT

PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE
$5,927.03 $5,927.03 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 $11,226.00 $11,226.00 $8,030.61 $15,127.08 $15,127.08 $6,000.00 $6,000.00 $117,914.00 $117,914.00 $33,780.31 $105,381.84 $105,381.84 $375,000.00 $375,000.00 $435,813.00 $435,813.00 $293,934.97 $320.40 $4,485.60 $421.00 $5,894.00 $452.00 $6,328.00 $411.68 $1,409.74 $1,409.74 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 $2,263.00 $2,263.00 $2,474.55 $10,404.85 $10,404.85 $36,000.00 $36,000.00 $63,418.00 $63,418.00 $74,410.80 $121,358.58 $121,358.58 $200,000.00 $200,000.00 $68,534.00 $68,534.00 $127,307.27 $113,005.61 $113,005.61 $75,000.00 $75,000.00 $388,812.00 $388,812.00 $161,926.61 $259.57 $19,986.89 $345.00 $26,565.00 $491.00 $37,807.00 $486.67 $184.05 $1,162,275.75 $210.00 $1,326,150.00 $241.00 $1,521,915.00 $187.52 $244.04 $1,140,642.96 $310.00 $1,448,940.00 $225.00 $1,051,650.00 $229.22 $339.81 $1,010,934.75 $340.00 $1,011,500.00 $335.00 $996,625.00 $305.50 $3,886.21 $11,658.63 $5,500.00 $16,500.00 $3,422.00 $10,266.00 $3,440.37 $4,745.98 $246,790.96 $5,650.00 $293,800.00 $3,880.00 $201,760.00 $3,896.68 $7,382.51 $81,207.61 $9,900.00 $108,900.00 $6,182.00 $68,002.00 $6,568.91 $14,119.89 $352,997.25 $20,000.00 $500,000.00 $15,975.00 $399,375.00 $14,885.96 $5,661.20 $390,622.80 $8,200.00 $565,800.00 $7,863.00 $542,547.00 $7,201.76 $4,195.79 $545,452.70 $5,900.00 $767,000.00 $9,576.00 $1,244,880.00 $5,585.66 $8,631.91 $8,631.91 $27,000.00 $27,000.00 $11,635.00 $11,635.00 $17,565.74 $8,860.30 $17,720.60 $32,000.00 $64,000.00 $12,134.00 $24,268.00 $16,862.45 $452.20 $16,279.20 $1,200.00 $43,200.00 $1,862.00 $67,032.00 $911.72 $834.59 $8,345.90 $4,750.00 $47,500.00 $2,906.00 $29,060.00 $2,323.63 $3,143.38 $6,286.76 $5,350.00 $10,700.00 $5,530.00 $11,060.00 $4,464.33 $8,418.94 $16,837.88 $11,000.00 $22,000.00 $9,421.00 $18,842.00 $8,209.26 $9,109.50 $9,109.50 $11,500.00 $11,500.00 $24,179.00 $24,179.00 $11,504.57 $364.96 $24,087.36 $725.00 $47,850.00 $633.00 $41,778.00 $550.82 $373.50 $17,181.00 $750.00 $34,500.00 $1,288.00 $59,248.00 $674.07 $42.43 $13,577.60 $70.00 $22,400.00 $66.00 $21,120.00 $51.62 $5,477,728.34 $7,108,699.00 $7,477,357.00 $6,018,003.12 Site Works Solutions SnL Group, Inc Allen Gill Construction, Inc Shaded areas indicate corrections made in accordance with the Special Provisions. Page 2 of 2Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: ^Bid Tabulation (4.11(c)--Award BN No. 5462 Athens Area Water Improvements) Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: ^Notice of Exemption (4.11(c)--Award BN No. 5462 Athens Area Water Improvements)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the City Engineer to implement a Parking Fee Holiday from 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., on Friday, May 1 7, 2024, for the annual Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast held in Downtown Redding.

Fiscal Impact

The City of Redding’s (City) parking system requires payment during weekdays from 8 :00 a.m. to 6 :00 p.m., with an exception for holidays. The current parking rate is $1 per hour. Not collecting a parking fare, systemwide, for four hours on a weekday is anticipated to result in a loss of revenue of no more than $800.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to approve the Parking Fee Holiday and continue with the paid parking system during the time of the Asphalt Cowboys Pancake B reakfast (Pancake Breakfast).

Background/Analysis

The Asphalt Cowboys have been serving the community with the annual pancake breakfast since the 1950s. This event is well recognized and attracts nearly 10,000 participants as well as dozens of volunteers and support personnel. In the last few years, the event relocated from Market Street in front of the Cascade Theatre to the newly reintroduced section of Market Street between Butte and Yuba Streets.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Implement a Parking Fee Holiday for Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 146
Report to Redding City Council April 30, 2024
Re: 4.11(d)--Parking Fee Holiday for Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast Page 2

With the new parking strategy being implemented for just over a year in the Downtown area, the Asphalt Cowboys ’ organization remains concerned that paid parking may hinder community participation for the event. The Asphalt Cowboys’ organization has submitted the attached letter requesting the City not to charge for parking in the downtown core during the event hours , for not only this year , but also for future instances of the event. At its regular meeting on May 2, 2023, Council approved a Paid Parking Holiday for the 2023 annual pancake breakfast.

Feedback to staff from community members indicated that the stay on paid parking largely affected their attendance at the event. With the positive feedback received from the community , staff remains supportive of the annual request, as this event is truly unique in both size and scale as well as the long -standing tradition the citizens of Redding expect and support. It will not be the intent of staff to entertain similar requests for events in the future that are smaller in scale and do not meet the same time -honored tradition standard s as the pancake brea kfast. Staff is considering bringing forth an Ordinance at the next parking program update later in the year for Council to consider a permanent parking holiday for the annual pancake breakfast along with other necessary changes to the parking strategy.

Environmental Review

This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Pancake Breakfast Parking Request
Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 147
Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: ^Pancake Breakfast Parking Request (4.11(d)--Parking Fee Holiday for Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast) Est. t 953
Reddin 9
Est. 1953
Reddin 9
Est. 1953
Reddin 9
Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: ^Pancake Breakfast Parking Request (4.11(d)--Parking Fee Holiday for Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast) Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: ^Pancake Breakfast Parking Request (4.11(d)--Parking Fee Holiday for GI " Y F

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: May 2, 2023 FROM: Chuck Aukland, Public ITEM NO. 4. 11( e) Works Director
APPROVED BY***
caukland@ci. redding. ca. us
N,,
r
r}' spPin, Ci ana 4r'2/ 2423
btippin@cityofredding. org
SUBJECT: 4. 11( e)-- Implement a Parking Fee Holiday for Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast
Recommendation
Authorize staff to implement a Parking Fee Holiday from 8: 00 a. m. to 12: 00 p. m., on Friday, May 19, 2023, for the annual Asphalt Cowboys PancakeBreakfast held in Downtown Redding.

Fiscal Impact
The City' s parking system requires payment during weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., with an exception for holidays. The current parking rate is $ 1 per hour. Not collecting a parking fare, systemwide, for four hours on a weekday will result in a loss of revenue of less than $ 800.

Alter native Action
The City Council ( Council) may choose not to approve the Parking Fee Holiday and continue with the paid parking system during the time of the breakfast.

Background/ Analysis
The Asphalt Cowboys have been serving the community with the annual pancake breakfast since the 1950s. This event is we11recognized and attracts nearly 10,000 participants as well as dozens of volunteers and support personnel. In the few years, the event relocated from Market Street in front of the Cascade Theatre to the newly reintroduced section of Market Street between Butte and Yuba Streets.

With the parking strategy relatively new to the Downtown area, the Asphalt Cowboys organization is concerned that paid parking may hinder community participation for the event. It has submitted the attached letter requesting the City not to charge for parking in the downtown core during the event hours, for not only this year but for the future instances of the event. While there are concerns related to preeedenee, staff is supportive of the request as this event is truly unique in both size and scale as we11 as the long- standing tradition the citizens of Redding expect Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Parking Fee Holiday for Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast) Report to Redding City Council Apri127, 2023
Re: 4. 11( e)-- Parking Fee Holiday forAsphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast Page 2 and support. It will not be the intent of staff to entertain similar requests for events in the future that are smaller in scale and do not meet the same time- honored tradition standards as the pancake breakfast. The Council will be asked to consider a more permanent approval of this arrangementat a future Council meeting after the planned presentation of the parking program efficacy at some time this summer.

EnviNonmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/ City Manager Goals
This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Asphalt Cowboys Letter
Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Parking Fee Holiday for Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast) Apr l 18, 202
H ar carable May r CWqicha) C a quistca,
As the Chairrnan c f the 9' Annual A halt r rbc y a ke re kf st, I vu ul lik t invit y u, yc ar fe l a r out ilrn mb s, n l , a yaurcl sest fri ds r nj y th inest par ca es erv anyw ere in i t Ca nt tF is ir g Friday, iViay 1
t',

2. s has E e r tt traditi n f r g r ra oros f
Re[ ding f r ilies; ir g l ac tca the 195{' s,, r ntend t ald the Par cake Bre kf sf in fihe heart of tl s.rrrt rwr Red ing,
As i v rr c v r taas ev l ed, s h ve t e A ah lt r utiib ts L s y r u+# it d a rel ate t bre kfast a fewv rlcack r c tih ta th n v4r6yc n sec ic n c f ket t., pr vi a asl re rred t as# h awt t wn mail and d wr c wn pr rr en d. As cha ng h v ccurr d in th dov ntourr re, s m c ll nges hav aris s tivell. Th city hi s r nt1y dr p e par C ng stra tegy r he d aunt wn are ir rec nt m r tl s. ue t t sh e€ It rn ca cit zens that tend th ar akfast iear y 1fl, Q0a ach ye r r re Irav seria s c a c rns that th p r n st ategy ac apted fo- ar al re kday u ne ay r at be the rn st effec ve str t gy for a large peci! ot bli vent of thi size, rr# v ri a s nder r ce i; ev nt" s de r an Ic ng- rm wi bility.- lon with the c nstant lo d'in, a lo ing, a d at r ri acar r us v h c durin, h v r t; we are c c rned that c rata ans erill imp ct i a+ nell.

In h r A the Aspl alt c vt sys ar r questing t e R a ing Gity Cc c Bd cl re a p r 6nghali ay an Frit y, May
t'
2 3 h s asper d& i parking ar d p rking nf r m n r that d y, cr at lea t ur til pr. 11Vdevv auld Is+( iket rer u st a acli y b put n la e to ext r d th s rarCingf alidayt fut re it s crf the Asphalt Cc w oy' s€ an k r akfast.` f i js r uak ly th larg st, nd mc s v«rel- krr nrn siro l pe k 9ic ev nt in the City of Fted i in any given year nd it is n hc nrar c have t d w t wra. F r 7 y ars- t e C6ty ar the Aspha[ t Cc wboys have,+ r arked t ther tt s ag s n th r g th t is r ly ta qt fi+.- our cc rnmur bty an e hc p t at r i iai c n n in e; h k y u f+r y ur cc nsid ratiran.

Ssnc' d
C m rflr 11dii let n
C irrr n
6#
gh
Ar nua[ Asptaalt c vrrbcays P I fas
Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(d)--Parking Fee Holiday for Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals No. 5 457, to provide engineering design services for the Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operations Project:
(1) Award the Consultant and Professional Services Contract to Water Works Engineers, LLC, in an amount not to exceed $1,199,280;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the contract with Water Works Engineers, LLC; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $100,000.

Fiscal Impact

Total project cost for the Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operations (RODEO) Project is estimated to be roughly $12 million including design, environmental compliance and permitting, construction and construction management. The required professional services to prepare the project for construction is estimated to cost approximately $1.2 6 million. In February 2024, City Council (City) adopted a resolution appropriating $10 million in CalRecycle state grant funds, as well as $2 .6 million in City of Redding (City) Wastewater Utility funds providing sufficient dollars for the proposed Consulting and Professional Services Contract (Contract).

Alternative Action

The Council may choose not to award the contract for this project. This alternative would result in the project not being designed or constructed and the grant funding would need to be returned to CalRecycle. In addition, the Solid Waste Utility would be required to continue to find alternatives for disposing of food waste and other organics, as required by California Senate Bill (SB) 1383 and other legislative requirements, mandating the diversion of organics from landfills.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for Engineering Design Services for the Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 154
Report to Redding City Council April 30, 2024
Re: 4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution Page 2

Background/Analysis

In February 2024, Council accepted the grant funding from CalRecycle for the design and construction of the RODEO Project. This funding allowed staff to prepare a request for proposals (RFP) to solicit for the most qualified consultant to help with this project.

The RODEO Project involves the design and construction of a food waste receiving station at the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to accept organics into the existing anaerobic digestion process. In addition, the project includes constructing a biogas conditioning system to capture and process the produced methane gas which will be sold to PG&E via a pipeline injection station. This project will help meet the requirements of SB 1383 by diverting food waste from landfills, and will also prod uce renewable biogas , that will be captured and used for other beneficial purposes, as well as generating renewable energy credits for the City.

Consultant Selection Process

Four Public Works Department staff formed a review and selection panel. The panel’s evaluation was based on the RFP selection criteria and the consultants’ abilities and qualifications to perform all phases of the engineering design and construction management services required.

On March 21, 2024, one proposal, including design fee in a sealed envelope, was received. The panel members evaluated and scored the proposal based on the consultants understanding of the project/scope, project’s team experience with similar types of projects and City projects, experience and qualifications o f the team, ability to develop project solutions, project schedule, and geographic location of the team. Following the proposal evaluation and ranking, the proposed fees were opened, evaluated, and negotiated to include reasonable costs based on the scope of services. The panel ranked Water Works Engineers, LLC very favorably, and are confident in their ability to complete the project as outlined in the scope of work.

The consultant fee is estimated and payments will be for actual work performed on a no t-to- exceed basis. However, staff recommends the approval of an additional $ 100,000 in contingency reserve. Contingency funds may be necessary due to unforeseen project design issues. If the contingency reserve needs to be utilized, an amendment would be n egotiated with the consultant and the contract would be modified with approval of the City Manager.

The attached professional services contract with Water Works Engineers, LLC, is approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review

Consultant selection is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required at this time. The consultant will provide the design and technical study information necessary to ensure environmental complia nce as the project progresses. CEQA compliance documentation will be presented to Council at, or prior to, award of the project.

Packet Pg. 155
Report to Redding City Council April 30, 2024
Re: 4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution Page 3

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new on es, and encourage investment in community.”

Attachments
Contract
Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 156
Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 165
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 166
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: Contract (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Accept grant funding in the amount of $10,000,000 from CalRecycle for the design and construction of the Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation project, a food waste receiving and biogas production facility at the City of Redding (City) Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant;
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 26th Amendment to Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $10,000,000 in state grant funds and $2,600,000 in City Wastewater Department funds for the project; and
(3) Authorize the Public Works Director to sign the required documents with Pacific Gas and Electric Company for the design and construction of a biogas Pipeline Injection Station.

Fiscal Impact

The Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation ( RODEO) project's total cost is estimated to be $12,600,000 and will be funded by CalRecycle CoDigestion grant funding and the City of Redding’s (City) Wastewater Utility fund . The CalRecycle grant will provide $10,000,000 towards the project while Wastewater Utility provides $2, 600,000 from their reserve cash balance. Though funding for the construction of this facility was not previously budgeted, the Wastewater Utility has adequate reserve funding to cover costs exceeding the amount provided by grant funding.

Alternative Action

The City Council may decline to accept this grant funding. By doing so, this project will not be constructed and CalRecycle may allocate these funds to a nother agency. The Solid Waste Utility will continue to find alternatives for disposing of food waste and other organics, as required by California Senate Bill 1383 and other legislative requirements, mandating the diversion of organics from landfills.

MEETING DATE: February 6, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(h)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(h)--Accept CalRecycle grant funding for the Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation Project and adopt a Budget Resolution.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Report to Redding City Council January 31, 2024
Re: 4.11(h)--Accept CalRecycle Grant Funding for the (RODEO) and adopt Budget Reso Page 2

Background/Analysis

Recent State legislative changes regarding greenhouse gas emissions and the disposal of organic waste (California Senate Bill (SB) 1383, California Assembly Bill (AB) 32, AB 1826, AB 876, AB 341, and AB 1594) mandate that landfills no longer accept organic wastes. SB 1383 codified California's commitments to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and air pollution statewide .

Methane gas emissions from landfills are being targeted to reduce California’s Greenhouse Gas emissions. Currently, staff has secured the capacity for disposal of source-separated organic food waste material at the closest commercial organics processing facility in Oroville, CA. This material is planned to be trucked to the facility by City Solid Waste staff and processed at a current rate of $84/ton increasing to $95/ton in 2025 with an estimated annual cost of $ 74,000.

This cost doesn’t include staff or trucking costs. This ongoing cost will continue to increase annually as capacity becomes less available. As a result, staff has identified the RODEO project that leverages existing City infrastructure and will eliminate the need for Solid Waste to transport organics out of the area and reduce its processing fees.

The RODEO project would construct a food waste receiving statio n at the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to accept organics into the existing anaerobic digestion process and biogas conditioning system to produce methane gas which will be sold to Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) via a Pipeline Injection Station. This Project helps meet the requirements of SB 1383 by diverting food waste from landfills, and will also produce methane gas, which will be captured and used for other beneficial purposes. In addition, it is anticipated that the project will generate renewable energy credits for the City.

A feasibility study was conducted with PG&E to determine if current PG&E infrastructure would be adequate to accept the methane gas produced by the RODEO project. PG&E determined that the project is feasible and it has b een cleared by PG&E for further design. A contract with PG&E for preliminary engineering of a methane gas Pipeline Injection Station would need to be executed for an initial amount of $50,000. As the project development process continues, the contract with PG&E will need to be amended to provide additional funding for the construction of the Pipeline Injection Station, estimated at approximately $3,500,000.

On January 18, 2022, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022 -001 authorizing the submission of applications for all California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) grants for which the City is eligible through January 18, 2027. The Resolution also authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute in the name of the City all grant documents, applications, agreements, amendments, and requests for payment, necessary to secure grant funds and implement the approved grant project.

In May 2023, the Solid Waste and Wastewater utilities hired a consultant to apply for a competitive grant from CalRecycle’s Organics Grant Program. The RODEO project was submitted for grant funding. These grant funds would cover project design and construction costs. On December 14, 2023, CalRecycle notified the City that the grant request was approved for the maximum award amount of $10,000,000.

Staff recommends the addition of $2,600,000 of wastewater reserve funds to the FY2023 -24 capital budget to complete the Project.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) Report to Redding City Council January 31, 2024
Re: 4.11(h)--Accept CalRecycle Grant Funding for the (RODEO) and adopt Budget Reso Page 3

Environmental Review

Funding acceptance is not a project as defined by the C alifornia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required at this time. Acceptance of the grant funding will allow the design and environmental technical studies to proceed for the Food Waste Receiving and Biogas Production Facility Project. CEQA compliance documentation would be presented to Council at, or prior to, award of the project.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map_
^ORG7 Award RFA
^Attachment I - ORG7 Project Summaries
^PG&E Agreement and Attachment A1
^Reso 2022-001 - Authorizing Submittal of Application(s) For All CalRecycle Grants CalRecycle December 2023 Monthly Public Meeting Agenda Revised

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution) RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 26th AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060 APPROPRIATING $12,600,000 FOR THE REDDING ORGANICS DIVERSION TO

ENERGY OPERATION PROJECT AND THE ASSOCIATED FUNDIN G SOURCES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023-24

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
231

6392

Wastewater Treatment Capital
Outlay

$12,600,000

THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
231-6392-2910000-00000 Fund Balance 2,600,000$
Increase (Decrease) Revenue
231-6392-3631401-00000 State Grant Capital - Wastewater 10,000,000$ Increase Expenditures
231-6392-7800042-00000
Wastewater - Structures &
Improvements 12,600,000$
Total 12,600,000$ 12,600,000$
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $12,600,000 for the Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation project and the associated funding sources for fiscal year 2023-24.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 6th day of February, 2024, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

Request for Approval
To: Zoe Heller
Deputy Director, Division of Circular Economy

From: Michelle Martin
Branch Chief, Financial Resources Management Branch

Request Date: December 6, 2023

Decision Subject: Awards for the Organics Grant Program, Cycle 7 (Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, Fiscal Years 2021‒22 and 2022‒23, and General Fund, Fiscal Year 2022‒23)

Action By: December 13, 2023

Summary of Request
Staff requests approval of 23 grant awards in the amount of $130,620,128 for the competitive Organics Grant Program (Program) for fiscal years (FYs) 2021‒22 and 2022‒23. This Program was oversubscribed by $58,292,627 as $188,912,755 in funding was requested from 32 eligible applications received. The remaining passing applications, reflected in rank order in Table 3, could be funded if additional funds are allocated to this program in the future.

Funding
The FY 2021–22 proposed Budget, as amended by Senate Bill (SB 170) (Chapter 240, Statutes of 2021), allocated $70,000,000 to CalRecycle from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, with $3,500,000 reserved to cover administrative costs, as authorized in the Budget and shall be used to provide grants for the purposes of paragraphs (1), (2), or (5) of subdivision (b) of Section 42999 of the Public Resources Code. CalRecycle allocated $4,240,000 for a regional cycle of the Community Composting for Green Spaces Grant Program and $510,000 for a separate grant cycle for community composting projects, available only to Qualifying Tribal Entities. The remaining funding in the amount of $61,750,000 is recommended for award in this RFA.

The FY 2022–23 Budget, as amended by Assembly Bill (AB) 179 (Chapter 249, Statutes of 2022), allocated $15,000,000 to CalRecycle from the General Fund, with $750,000 reserved to cover administrative costs, as authorized in the Budget. CalRecycle has awarded $12,338,802 of the FY 2022–23 money in the cycle of the Organics Grant Program. The remaining $1,911,198 allocation for the purposes of paragraphs (1), (2), or (5) of subdivision (b) of Section 42999 of the Public Resources Code is recommended for award in this RFA.

The FY 2022–23 Budget, as amended by AB 179, allocated $10,000,000 to CalRecycle from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, with $500,000 reserved to cover administrative costs, as authorized in the Budget. CalRecycle awarded $3,950,527 of the FY 2022–23 money to an unfunded applicant from the Co-Digestion Grant Program, resulting in $5,549,473 being recommended for award for purposes of paragraph (6) of subdivision (b) of Section 42999 of the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

Public Resources Code. In addition, AB 179 allocated $180,000,000 to provide grants to local jurisdictions to assist in the implementation of SB 1383 (Lara, Chapter 395, Statutes of 2016).

Of that allocation, $81,000,000 was allocated to the Organics Grant Program to fund the immediate, critical infrastructure needed to process organic waste as required by SB 1383.

Eligible entities for this funding include cities, counties, cities and counties, Joint Powers Authorities, and special districts directly responsible for solid waste collection services.

CalRecycle recommends utilizing $61,409,457 of this funding to award all local jurisdiction applications with a passing score. The remaining amount of $19,590,543 will be redirected to the SB1383 Local Assistance Grant Program.

Table 1. Funding
Fund Source Amount
Available
Amount to
Fund Item
Amount
Remaining Line Item
Greenhouse Gas
Reduction Fund (FY
2021–22)
$61,750,000 $61,750,000 $0 Local Assistance
/Organic
Infrastructure
Grants
General Fund (FY
2022–23)
$1,911,198 $1,911,198 $0 Local Assistance
/Organic
Infrastructure
Grants
Greenhouse Gas
Reduction Fund (FY
2022–23
$5,549,473 $5,549,473 $0 Local Assistance
/Co-Digestion
Grants
Greenhouse Gas
Reduction Fund (FY
2022–23
$81,000,000 $61,409,457 $19,590,543 Local Assistance
/SB 1383 Grants
Total

$150,210,671 $130,620,128 $19,590,543

Background and Findings
Statutory Authority
Public Resources Code section 42995 et seq., added to statute by the enactment of SB 862 (Statutes of 2014, Chapter 36) and amended by SB 155 (Statutes of 2021, Chapter 258), authorizes CalRecycle to administer a grant program to provide financial assistance to reduce the emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) by promoting in-state development of infrastructure, food waste prevention, or other projects to reduce organic waste or process organic and other recyclable materials into new, value-added products.

Program Background
This Program is part of California Climate Investments, a statewide program that puts billions of Cap-and-Trade dollars to work reducing GHG emissions, strengthening the economy, and improving public health and the environment. At least 35 percent of California Climate Investments must benefit disadvantaged communities, low-income communities, and low- income households, collectively known as priority populations.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

This Program provides funds to support expansion of the waste management infrastructure, particularly for new or expanded organics infrastructure such as composting and digestion facilities, to achieve greenhouse gas reductions. These investments will result in reduced methane emissions from landfills; benefit priority populations by upgrading existing facilities and, where warranted, establish new facilities; result in air and water quality benefits in addition to greenhouse gas (GHG) emission reductions; and create jobs.

Criteria and Process
The Eligibility Criteria and Evaluation Process was discussed at the December 20, 2022, CalRecycle Public meeting and subsequently approved by the Deputy Director. The Notice of Funds Available was published on CalRecycle’s website on February 9, 2023, and a notice was sent to interested parties.

Applications were due to CalRecycle on May 2, 2023, with a secondary due date of May 11, 2023, for authorizing documentation submission. CalRecycle received 69 applications requesting a total of $387,845,869.30. After the close of the application period, staff reviewed the applications for completeness and eligibility. As a result, 20 applications were disqualified for either submitting an incomplete application or having an ineligible project. Staff reviewed the remaining applications in accordance with the approved evaluation and scoring criteria.

Subsequently, 17 applications did not receive a passing score. The maximum grant award is $500,000 for in-vessel projects, $3,000,000 for stand-alone pre-processing projects, $10,000,000 for anaerobic/co-digestion and compost projects, and $13,000,000 for anaerobic/co-digestion and compost projects with a pre-processing project. Staff proposes to fund 23 of the 32 eligible applicants. If additional monies become available, staff recommends funding the remaining eligible applicants in rank order, as listed in Table 3. As a result of the projects recommended for award, 7.7 million tons of green and food material will be diverted from landfills, a reduction of over 2 million MTCO
2e in greenhouse gas emissions, and 114 jobs
will be created.

Attachments
See Attachment I – Project Summaries for a description of each project recommended for award.

Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of 23 grant awards as listed below for a total of $130,620,128.

Table 2. Recommended Awards
Applicant Project Type Award
Amount
Humboldt Waste Management
Authority*
Standalone Pre-Processing $2,710,081
Kochergen Farms Composting,
Inc. dba Green Valley
Recycling
Standalone Pre-Processing $3,000,000

* SB 1383 Funding Recipient

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

Applicant Project Type Award
Amount
Republic Services of Sonoma
County, Inc.

Standalone Pre-Processing $2,461,423
Sacramento County* Standalone Pre-Processing $3,000,000 Subtotal $11,171,504
California Grinding, Inc. Anaerobic Digestion $6,625,956† City of Napa* Anaerobic Digestion $10,000,000
City of Riverside* Co-Digestion $10,000,000
City of Redding* Co-Digestion $10,000,000
Los Angeles County Sanitation
Districts*
Co-Digestion $10,000,000
SANCO Services LP Anaerobic Digestion $10,000,000
University of California, Davis Anaerobic Digestion $4,769,324 Subtotal $61,395,280
Anderson Landfill, Inc. Compost $10,000,000
California Wood Recycling dba
Agromin
Compost $10,000,000
Forward, Inc. Compost $5,167,510
Kern County* Compost $10,000,000
Northern Recycling, LLC Compost $10,000,000
Riverside County* Compost $1,288,470
Western Placer Waste
Management Authority*
Compost $9,960,379
Subtotal $56,416,359
California State University,
Sacramento
In-Vessel $179,618
DSM Group, LLC In-Vessel $341,367
Foodbank of Santa Barbara -
Goleta
In-Vessel $500,000
Foodbank of Santa Barbara -
Santa Maria
In-Vessel $500,000
University of Southern
California
In-Vessel $116,000
Subtotal $1,636,985
Grand Total $130,620,128

† Recommending partial award due to limited funds. Remaining amount included in Table 3.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

Table 3. Recommended Awards if Additional Funds Become
Available - B- List

Applicant Project Type Approved
Amount
California Grinding, Inc. Anaerobic Digestion $3,236,544‡ Arakelian Enterprises, Inc. DBA
Crown Recycling Services
Standalone Pre-Processing $3,000,000
Recology Ostrom Road Compost $10,000,000
Engel & Gray, Inc. Compost $2,799,620
Arakelian Enterprises, Inc., dba
American Organics
Compost $9,636,000
Universal Waste Systems, Inc. Standalone Pre-Processing $3,000,000 Mid-Valley Recycling, LLC Anaerobic Digestion $10,000,000 North State Renewables LLC Anaerobic Digestion $10,000,000 Paso Robles Waste Disposal
Inc. dba Paso Robles Waste &
Recycle
Anaerobic Digestion $2,643,200
Lost Hills Environmental LLC Compost $3,977,263
Total $58,292,267

Deputy Director Action
On the basis of the information and analysis in this Request for Approval and the findings set out herein, I hereby conditionally approve the grant awards for the Organics Grant Program as listed in Table 2. Each proposed grantee’s award is subject to two conditions:

1. The recommended grantee must pay all outstanding debts due to CalRecycle, or bring current any outstanding payments owed to CalRecycle, within 60 days of the date of the award email.

2. The recommended grantee’s Signature Authority (or where delegation is authorized, his or her Designee) must sign and return the Grant Agreement to CalRecycle. The signed Grant Agreement must be received by CalRecycle within 60 days of the date of the award email.

___________________________ ____________________________ Zoe Heller Dated
Deputy Director

‡ Remaining recommended award amount from Table 2.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
Attachment I
Organics Grant Program, Fiscal Year 2021–22
and 2022–23 Project Summaries

The projects with proposed grant awards are briefly summarized below. Note that in some instances, CalRecycle modified GHG emission reductions and tons diverted estimates contained within the application documents due to factors such as ineligible feedstock and tonnages reported outside of the grant term.

Standalone Pre-Processing
• Applicant: Humboldt Waste Management Authority
• County: Humboldt
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $2,710,081
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 47,298
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 237,823

Humboldt Waste Management Authority proposes a Stand-Alone Pre-Processing project to convert an existing 19,000-square-foot building at the Hawthorne Street Transfer Station located in Eureka, CA into an Organics Waste Processing Operation. The renovated facility will be used to receive, sort and process new residential co-collected and commercial source-separated food and green material currently disposed of at the Dry Creek Landfill. Commercial food material will be cleaned and processed into an organic slurry that will be transported to a composting facility. The project will result in 237,823 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 47,298 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. In addition, the project will provide an estimated five full-time jobs targeted for priority populations and supports Humboldt County’s edible food recovery program.

• Applicant: Kochergen Farms Composting, Inc. dba Green Valley Recycling • County: Fresno
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $3,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 99,447
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 461,137

Kochergen Farms Composting, Inc. (KFC), DBA Green Valley Recycling (GVR) proposes a Stand- Alone Pre-Processing project to install a food waste depackaging system, at the Green Valley Recycling Transfer and Processing Facility. Source separated food and green material (SSO) will be cleaned and processed into an organic slurry that will be transferred to KFC for composting. The SSO and residential food material is currently disposed of at the American Avenue Landfill in Fresno County, CA, located in a low-income community. The project will result in 461,137 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 90,447 MTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. In addition, the project will provide up to 15 jobs targeted for priority populations.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
• Applicant: Republic Services of Sonoma County, Inc.
• County: Sonoma
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $2,461,423
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 163,020
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 452,833

Republic Services of Sonoma County, Inc. proposes a Stand-Alone Pre-Processing project at their Sonoma County Central Transfer/Processing Facility in Petaluma, CA. This project will install a depackaging system to remove contamination from source-separated commercial food material currently disposed of at the Republic Services of Sonoma County, Inc. Central Disposal Site. Food and green material will be sent to Republic Services of Sonoma County’s composting facility in Richmond. The project will result in 452,833 tons of newly diverted food and green material from a landfill located in a low-income community and a reduction of 163,020 MTCO 2e of greenhouse gas
emissions over ten years. In addition, the project will provide an estimated two full-time permanent jobs targeted for priority populations.

• Applicant: Sacramento County
• County: Sacramento
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $3,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 94,357
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 452,760

Sacramento County Department of Waste Management and Recycling proposes a Stand-Alone Pre- Processing project to construct a dedicated building at its North Area Recovery Station for the pre- processing of food and green material currently disposed of at Kiefer Landfill. Commingled food and green material generated from residential curbside collection will be delivered to the new facility and pre-processed to remove contaminants. Once food and green material are pre-processed into one of four top load-out ports within the new transfer building, it is transferred to a permitted composting facility. The project will result in 452,760 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 94,357 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. The project will provide job training to members of priority populations that will lead to industry recognized licenses/certifications.

Anaerobic Digestion/Co-Digestion
• Applicant: California Grinding, Inc.
• County: Fresno
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $6,625,956
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 150,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 390,000

California Grinding Inc (CGI) proposes to build an anaerobic digestion facility that will include installation of pre-processing equipment, anaerobic digesters, a biogas upgrading system, and a pre- digestion system. The food and green material are currently landfilled at American Avenue Disposal Site, Visalia Disposal Site, and Woodville Landfill. The project will result in 390,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfills located in disadvantaged and low-income communities

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
and a reduction of 150,000 MTCO2e over ten years. The facility will produce renewable natural gas that will be injected into the adjacent PG&E pipeline and provide an estimated 26 permanent jobs targeting priority populations.
• Applicant: City of Napa
• County: Napa
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 120,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 300,000

The City of Napa proposes to add an anaerobic digestion operation at its material diversion facility.

The project will include installation of food waste pre-processing and polishing equipment, an anaerobic digester, and a biogas upgrading system. The biogas will be used to produce compressed natural gas for on-site fueling of City trucks and Napa Recycling and Waste Services solid waste collection vehicles and renewable electricity to power facility operations. The digestate will typically be composted on-site in the covered aerated static pile unit or sent to another composting facility, if needed, but can also be dried and sold as fertilizer. The food and green material are currently landfilled at Vasco Road, Potrero Hills, Ox Mountain, and Clover Flat Landfills. The project will result in 300,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 120,000 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. The project will provide five permanent, full- time jobs targeting priority populations.
• Applicant: City of Riverside
• County: Riverside
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 81,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 200,000

The City of Riverside proposes the installation of food waste receiving, pre-processing, polishing, and storage infrastructure, as part of the Riverside Water Quality Control Plant co-digestion project. The project will significantly expand the facility’s food waste receiving and anaerobic co-digestion capacity. Food waste cake will be received via dump trucks, polished to a slurry to remove plastic and grit contaminants, and then co-digested with wastewater sludge. The biogas produced will be upgraded to renewable natural gas and injected into the SoCalGas utility pipeline. The commingled food and green material are currently landfilled at Badlands and Lamb Canyon Landfills. The project will result in 200,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material partially from a landfill located in a low-income community and a reduction of 81,000 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten
years. Benefits to priority populations include energy rate stabilization, air pollution reduction, and reduced impact to freshwater resources; as well as a wastewater treatment operator-in-training program targeted to local workers.
• Applicant: City of Redding
• County: Shasta
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO
2e) over ten years: 9,000

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 40,000

The City of Redding proposes to design and construct infrastructure that will enable the City to utilize excess anaerobic digestion capacity at the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant to divert food material from landfills for co-digestion. The project will include the construction of food waste slurry receiving equipment and storage tanks, a polishing process for intake of feedstock into the existing anaerobic digesters, and a two-stage biogas conditioning system to meet the increased output of biogas before injecting this renewable natural gas into the PG&E gas transmission main. The source- separated food and green material is currently landfilled at West Central Landfill. The project will result in 40,000 tons of newly diverted food material from a landfill located in a low-income community, a reduction of over 9,000 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years, and will create one full-time permanent job.
• Applicant: Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts
• County: Los Angeles
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 160,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 600,000

Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts (LACSD) proposes to expand its Food Waste Recycling Program with the construction of the Biogas Conditioning System 2 (BCS-2), which will include equipment such as biogas compression, dehydration, and treatment systems. BCS-2 will allow the co-digestion facility to operate at full capacity. BCS-2 will upgrade biogas generated from the co- digestion of food material at LACSD’s Joint Water Pollution Control Plant into renewable natural gas for vehicle use at LACSD's compressed natural gas fueling station or injection into the SoCalGas utility pipeline. The source-separated food material is currently being landfilled at Mid-Valley Sanitary Landfill, Lost Hills Environmental Waste Facility, and Salton City Solid Waste Site. The project will result in 600,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfills located in disadvantaged and low-income communities and a reduction of 160,000 MTCO 2e of greenhouse gas
emissions over ten years. Benefits to priority populations include air and water pollution reduction and energy from renewable natural gas.
• Applicant: SANCO Services LP
• County: San Diego
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO
2e) over ten years: 300,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 775,000

SANCO Services LP proposes to expand its anaerobic digestion operation located at the Escondido Resource Recovery facility. The project will include the installation of two new digesters and a biogas upgrading system. The facility will also produce high-quality compost that will be sent to farms in San Diego and Imperial Counties. The project will add renewable gas injected into the San Diego Gas and Electric pipeline and be used to fuel waste collection fleets. The commingled and source-separated food and green material is currently landfilled at Sycamore and Otay Landfills. The project will result in 775,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of over

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
300,000 MTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years, and create an estimated eight permanent jobs targeting priority populations.
• Applicant: University of California, Davis
• County: Yolo
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $4,769,324
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 18,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 75,000

UC Davis proposes to expand its Renewable Energy Anaerobic Digester facility. The facility improvements will consist of upgraded feedstock processing equipment and the installation of a gas engine generator. The food and green material are currently landfilled at Yolo County Landfill. The project will result in 75,000 tons of newly diverted food material from landfill and a reduction of 18,000 MTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. The project will also produce green, carbon- negative electricity for use in campus electric vehicles and electric buses, which serves the campus and surrounding community, including grade-school students, low-income residents, disabled persons, and older adults.

Compost
• Applicant: Anderson Landfill, Inc.
• County: Shasta
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 30,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 122,000

Anderson Landfill, Inc. proposes to construct and operate a new windrow composting operation at Anderson Landfill. The newly constructed facility will have an initial throughput capacity of approximately 68,000 tons per year. The food and yard material are currently landfilled at Anderson Landfill which is located in a low-income community. The project will result in 122,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 30,000 MTCO 2e of greenhouse gas
emissions over ten years. In addition, the facility will dedicate part of their landfill as wildlife habitat, provide financial support for various community centers, and provide an estimated eight new full-time jobs targeting a priority population.

• Applicant: California Wood Recycling dba Agromin
• County: Ventura
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO
2e) over ten years: 147,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 681,000

California Wood Recycling dba Agromin proposes to expand its existing composting facility in Santa Paula. The Limoneira site will utilize a covered aerated static pile composting system to divert an additional 68,125 tons per year of food and green material from landfill. The green and food material is currently landfilled at Simi Valley Landfill, Toland Road Landfill, or Lost Hills Landfill. The project will result in 681,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
147,000 MTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. In addition, the project will provide 26 jobs targeting a priority population, support community projects with free compost, and provide funds for the Santa Paula Sports Park rehabilitation project.

• Applicant: Forward, Inc.
• County: San Joaquin
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $5,167,510
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 102,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 467,000

Forward, Inc. proposes to expand their existing composting facility by adding an aerated static pile composting system that can process an additional 200 tons of organics per day. The green and food material is currently landfilled at Forward, Inc. Landfill or Austin Road Landfill, with Forward, Inc.

Landfill located in a disadvantaged community. The project will result in 467,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 102,000 MTCO 2e of greenhouse gas
emissions over ten years. The project will provide free compost to the community, support the Edible Schoolyard Community Farm Project, and provide three full time permanent jobs targeting a priority population.

• Applicant: Kern County
• County: Kern
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO
2e) over ten years: 247,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 831,000

Kern County Public Works proposes to construct a covered aerated static pile composting system at its facility located at the Shafter Wasco Sanitary Landfill. Grant-funded equipment includes an excavator, conveyer, shredder, screen and other pre-processing equipment, and a covered aerated static pile bunker system. The green and food material is currently landfilled at Shafter-Wasco Landfill, Mojave-Rosamond Sanitary Landfill, Bena Sanitary Landfill, or Ridgecrest Recycling and Sanitary Landfill, with Shafter-Wasco Landfill located in a disadvantaged community. The project will increase composting capacity by 100,000 tons per year and result in 831,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 247,000 MTCO 2e of greenhouse gas
emissions over ten years. It will also provide free compost for expanding tree and green zones in Kern County, and hire an estimated six new full-time permanent jobs targeting a priority population.

• Applicant: Northern Recycling, LLC
• County: Yolo
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $10,000,000
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 114,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 330,000

Northern Recycling, LLC proposes to expand a covered aerated static pile composting facility located at Yolo County Central Landfill. Grant funds will be used for a composting aeration system, working pads, and equipment to screen and sort food and green material. The green and food material is currently landfilled at Forward Landfill, Kiefer Road Landfill, Lockwood Landfill, Potrero Hills Landfill,

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 188
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)

Attachment I: Project Summaries for Organics Grant Program Fiscal Year 2021-22 and 2022-23
Neal Road Landfill, or Keller Canyon. The project will divert an additional 32,970 tons per year of food and local communities’ green material from landfills. The project will result in 330,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 114,000 MTCO2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. In addition, the project will reduce pesticide and groundwater use in the surrounding agriculture community, support edible food recovery, and provide an estimated seven new full-time permanent jobs targeting a priority population.

• Applicant: Riverside County
• County: Riverside
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: Yes
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $1,288,470
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 9,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 59,000

Riverside County proposes to construct a new windrow composting facility and purchase a loader and a water tank, for the newly operational Badlands Compost Facility. The source-separated food and green material is currently landfilled at the Badlands Landfill which is located in a disadvantaged community. The project will result in 59,000 tons of newly diverted green material from landfill and a reduction of 9,000 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years. In addition, the project will provide free compost for use in the local community, and an estimated two jobs targeting a priority population.

• Applicant: Western Placer Waste Management Authority
• County: Placer
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: No
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $9,960,379
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 296,000
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 1,259,000

Western Placer Waste Management Authority proposes to construct a new aerated static pile composting facility and increase capacity to process food and green material. Additionally, grant funds will purchase equipment, including a grinder, stacker, conveyer, magnet, screens, and blowers.

The green and food material is currently landfilled at the Western Regional Sanitary Landfill. The project will result in 1,259,000 tons of newly diverted food and green material from landfill and a reduction of 296,000 MTCO
2e of greenhouse gas emissions over ten years.

In-Vessel

• Applicant: California State University, Sacramento
• County: Sacramento
• Provides Benefits to Priority Populations: No
• Grant Funds Recommended for Award: $179,618
• Estimated GHGs (MTCO2e) over ten years: 345
• Estimated Diversion (Tons) over ten years: 958

Sacramento State University proposes to replace an organics compactor located at the Dining Commons with an in-vessel composting system. This will eliminate the need for the waste hauler to provide service for the compactor, which will reduce emissions associated with waste transportation.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Previous Staff Report (4.11(e)--Award Request for Proposal No. 5457 and Authorize Execution)