Agenda Packet — Redding City Council, October 15, 2024 (part 2 of 2)

October 2024
Prior to approval of the project, the lead agency may conclude, at a public hearing, that certain mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are infeasible or undesirable. In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15074.1, the lead agency may delete those mitigation measures and substitute other measures that it determines are equivalent or more effective. The lead agency would adopt written findings that the new measure(s) is(are) equivalent or more effective in mitigating or avoiding potential significant effects and that it would not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.
1) Based on the whole record (including the Initial Study and any supporting documentation) and the mitigation measures incorporated into the project, the City of Redding has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 2) The Mitigated Negative Declaration, with its supporting documentation, reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the lead agency, which is the City of Redding.

DOCUMENTATION
The attached Initial Study documents the reasons to support the above determination.

MITIGATION MEASURES
The following mitigation measures will be incorporated into the project to minimize potential effects on biological resources:

MM-1. All in-water work shall occur during July 1 to October 31 to avoid peak times when listed juvenile anadromous fish would be present.

MM-2. Before dewatering, there will be a visual inspection for fish presence. If fish are noted, they will be herded away from the work area, using seines if possible, and prevented from returning to the area using block nets.

MM-3. Environmental awareness training for construction personnel will be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to onset of work to brief them on how to recognize Northwestern pond turtle and the appropriate avoidance measures.

MM-4. Twenty-four hours prior to initiation of ground disturbance or vegetation removal, a qualified biologist shall perform a pre-construction survey for western pond turtle and their nests. If western pond turtles are encountered in the project area during construction and could be harmed by construction activities, work will stop immediately in the area and the individual turtles will be allowed to move away on their own accord. If a Northwestern pond turtle nest is found, a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW and USFWS) will determine the extent of a construction-free buffer zone to be established around the nest.

MM-5. If construction or vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, February 1 through August 31 for birds and November 1 through July 15 for raptors, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey to locate active nests. The pre-construction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities occurs for 7 days or longer, another pre-construction survey will be performed. If an active nest is found, a qualified Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: ^Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(a)--Canter Court Sewer Project) City of Redding
Mitigated Negative Declaration Public Works Department, Engineering Division Canter Court Sewer Project Page 3
October 2024
biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a buffer zone to be established around the nest.

MM-6. To the extent practicable, removal of large trees with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before bat maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 31). If construction (including the removal of large trees) occurs during the bat non-volant season (March 1 through August 31), a qualified professional shall conduct a pre-construction survey of the study area to locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect colonies from disturbance. The preconstruction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a maternity colony is located within or adjacent to the study area, a disturbance free buffer shall be established by a qualified professional, in consultation with CDFW, to ensure the colony is protected from project activities.

MM-7. To the extent practicable, removal of riparian brush will occur outside of the maternal denning period (i.e., July 1–April 30). If vegetation removal is to occur during the maternal denning period (May 1–June 30), a qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey of the study area to locate maternity dens and identify measures to protect the maternity dens from disturbance. The preconstruction survey will be performed no more than seven days prior to the vegetation removal.

MM-8. High visibility fencing, flagging, or markers will be installed along the edges of the work zone near culturally sensitive zone to prevent damage or unauthorized access.

PUBLIC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Draft copies or notice of this Mitigated Negative Declaration were distributed to:
State Clearinghouse
Shasta County Clerk
California Department of Fish and Wildlife District 1 Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
California Native Plant Society
Native American Heritage Commission
State Office of Historic Preservation
All property owners within 300 feet of the property boundary

PUBLIC REVIEW
(X) Draft document referred for comments September 2, 2024 – October 2, 2024 Date
(X) No comments were received during the public review period. ( ) Comments were received but did not address the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration findings or the accuracy/completeness of the Initial Study. No response is necessary. The letters are attached.

Packet Pg. 281 Attachment: ^Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(a)--Canter Court Sewer Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigated Negative Declaration

Page 4 ends

October 2024
( ) Comments addressing the findings of the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and/or accuracy or completeness of the Initial Study were received during the public review period. The letters and responses follow (see Attachment D, Response to Comments).

Copies of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Initial Study, documentation materials, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program may be obtained at the Public Works Department, Engineering Division, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact: Tiffany Lightle, Associate Environmental Specialist, (530) 225-4171 or [email protected].

Date of
Draft Report: September 2, 2024 By:

Name/ Title: Tiffany Lightle
Associate Environmental Specialist
Date of
Final Report:

Attachments:

A. Project Location Map
B. Initial Study
C. Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program D. Comments and Response to Comments (if any)
Tiffany Lightle
October 2, 2024
Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: ^Mitigated Negative Declaration (4.11(a)--Canter Court Sewer Project) Canter Court Sewer Project Page 1
October 2024

MITIGATION MONITORING AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM

CANTER COURT SEWER PROJECT
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 20244080916)

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CONTENTS
This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (MMP/ECP) for the Canter Court Sewer Project (project). The MMP/ECP includes a brief discussion of the legal basis for, and the purpose of, the program, discussion, and direction regarding complaints about noncompliance; a key to understanding the monitoring matrix; and the monitoring matrix.

LEGAL BASIS OF AND PURPOSE FOR THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM California Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires public agencies to adopt mitigation monitoring or reporting programs whenever certifying an environmental impact report (EIR) or a mitigated negative declaration (MND). This requirement facilitates implementation of all mitigation measures adopted through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.

The MMP contained herein is intended to satisfy the requirements of CEQA as they relate to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. It is intended to be used by City of Redding (City) staff, participating agencies, project contractors, and mitigation monitoring personnel during implementation of the project.

Mitigation is defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15370 as a measure that does any of the following:
▪ Avoids impacts altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action. ▪ Minimizes impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation. ▪ Rectifies impacts by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment. ▪ Reduces or eliminates impacts over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the project.
▪ Compensates for impacts by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments.

The intent of the MMP is to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of adopted mitigation measures and permit conditions. The MMP will provide for monitoring of construction activities as necessary, onsite identification and resolution of environmental problems, and proper reporting to City staff.

In addition to meeting the CEQA MMP requirements, this document incorporates environmental commitments, standard practices, conservation measures, and best management practices (BMPs). The environmental commitments may be part of the project design, standard contract specifications, City requirements, or conservation measures. These commitments are part of the project, but they do not constitute mitigation under CEQA as they have not been incorporated to reduce a potentially significant impact.

Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring And Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(a)--Canter Court Sewer Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program

Page 2 ends

October 2024

MITIGATION MONITORING/ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM TABLE The MMP/ECP Table identifies the mitigation measures and commitments proposed for the project.

The tables have the following columns:
▪ Mitigation Measure: Lists the mitigation measures identified within the Initial Study for a specific potentially significant impact, along with the number for each measure as enumerated in the Initial Study.
▪ Environmental Commitment: Lists the commitments identified within the project that are not related to a potentially significant CEQA impact, but further ensure environmental resource protection.
▪ Timing: Identifies at what point in time, review process, or phase the mitigation measure will be completed.
▪ Agency/Department Consultation: References the City department or any other public agency with which coordination is required to satisfy the identified mitigation measure. ▪ Verification: Spaces to be initialed and dated by the individual designated to verify adherence to a specific mitigation measure.

NONCOMPLIANCE COMPLAINTS
Any person or agency may file a complaint asserting noncompliance with the mitigation measures and commitments associated with the project. The complaint shall be directed to the City in written form, providing specific information on the asserted violation. The City shall investigate and determine the validity of the complaint. If noncompliance with a mitigation measure has occurred, the City shall take appropriate action to remedy any violation. The compliant shall receive written confirmation indicating the results of the investigation or the final action corresponding to the particular noncompliance issue.

Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring And Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(a)--Canter Court Sewer Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Canter Court Sewer Project Page 3
October 2024

MITIGATION MONITORING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM TABLE

FOR THE CANTER COURT SEWER PROJECT

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 202420244080916)

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
The following environmental commitments will be incorporated into the project to further protect environmental and biological resources:

Best Management Practices
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
Biological Resources (BIO)
BIO-1. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), as required by the City of Redding Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, will be prepared to address BMPs that will be used to prevent erosion and sediment loss within the project site. BMPs such as silt fence, mulching and seeding, and straw wattles will be placed where needed to prevent sediment from leaving the site during and after construction.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
BIO-2. Appropriate sediment control measures (e.g., silt fences, straw wattles) will be in place prior to the onset of construction activities near waters of the United States and in project areas where there is a potential for surface runoff to drain into jurisdictional waters. Sediment control measures will be monitored and maintained until construction activities have ceased.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
BIO-3. High visibility fencing, flagging, or markers will be installed along the edges of the work zone near avoided waters and riparian areas. In addition, equipment entry and exit points; and staging, storage, and stockpile areas must be clearly marked prior to the entry of mechanized equipment or vehicles into the construction area.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
Cultural Resources (CR)
CR-1. If previously unidentified cultural materials are unearthed during construction, it is the City’s policy that work be halted in that area until a qualified archaeologist can assess the significance of the find. Additional archaeological surveys will be needed if the proposed project undertaking limits are extended beyond the present survey area of potential effect limits.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring And Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(a)--Canter Court City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Canter Court Sewer Project Page 4
October 2024
Best Management Practices
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
CR-2. If human remains are discovered during project activities, all activities near the find will be stopped, and the Shasta County Sheriff-Coroner’s Office will be notified. If the coroner determines that the remains may be those of a Native American, the coroner will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Treatment of the remains will be conducted in accordance with further direction of the County Coroner or NAHC, as appropriate.

Construction City/NAHC/
County Coroner
Hazards and Hazardous Materials (HAZ)
HAZ-1. Hazardous materials, including fuels, oils, cement, and solvents will be stored and contained in an area protected from direct runoff and away from areas where they could enter waters of the United States.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ-2. Construction equipment will be inspected daily for leaks. Leaking fluids will be contained upon detection, and equipment repairs will be made as soon as practicable, or the leaking equipment will be moved offsite.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ-3. Secondary containment such as drip pans or absorbent materials will be used to catch spills or leaks when removing or changing fluids. Secondary containment will be used for storage of all hazardous materials.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ-4. Spill containment and clean-up materials will be kept onsite at all times for use in the event of an accidental spill.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ-5. Absorbent materials will be used on small spills rather than hosing down or burying the spill. The absorbent material will be promptly removed and disposed of properly.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ-6. With the exception of vegetation clearing equipment, no vehicles or construction equipment may be operated in areas of tall, dry vegetation.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
HAZ 7. A Fire Prevention and Suppression Plan would be developed for any maintenance and repair activities that require welding or otherwise carry a higher risk of starting a wildfire.

Preconstruction City/
Construction
Management
Hydrology and Water Quality (WQ)
WQ-1. All construction work and stockpiling of materials will be confined to the project disturbance area.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
Packet Pg. 286 Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring And Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(a)--Canter Court City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Canter Court Sewer Project Page 5
October 2024
Best Management Practices
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
WQ-2. Temporary stockpiling of excavated or imported material will be placed in upland areas. Construction City/ Construction
Management
WQ-3. Excess soil will be used onsite or disposed of at a regional landfill or other appropriate facility.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring And Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(a)--Canter Court City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Canter Court Sewer Project Page 6
October 2024

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT MITIGATION MEASURES Resource-specific mitigation measures that will be used during project implementation include the following:

Mitigation Measure (MM)
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
Biological Resources (BIO)
MM-1. All in-water work shall occur during July 1 to October 31 to avoid peak times when listed juvenile anadromous fish would be present.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
MM-2. Before dewatering, there will be a visual inspection for fish presence. If fish are noted, they will be herded away from the work area, using seines if possible, and prevented from returning to the area using block nets.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
MM-3. Environmental awareness training for construction personnel will be conducted by a qualified biologist prior to onset of work to brief them on how to recognize Northwestern pond turtle and the appropriate avoidance measures.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
MM-4. Twenty-four hours prior to initiation of ground disturbance or vegetation removal, a qualified biologist shall perform a pre-construction survey for western pond turtle and their nests. If western pond turtles are encountered in the project area during construction and could be harmed by construction activities, work will stop immediately in the area and the individual turtles will be allowed to move away on their own accord. If a Northwestern pond turtle nest is found, a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW and USFWS) will determine the extent of a construction-free buffer zone to be established around the nest.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
MM-5. If construction or vegetation removal occurs during the nesting season, February 1 through August 31 for birds and November 1 through July 15 for raptors, a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey to locate active nests. The pre-construction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a lapse in construction activities occurs for 7 days or longer, another pre-construction survey will be performed. If an active nest is found, a qualified biologist (in consultation with the CDFW) will determine the extent of a buffer zone to be established around the nest.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
Packet Pg. 288 Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring And Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(a)--Canter Court City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Canter Court Sewer Project Page 7
October 2024
Mitigation Measure (MM)
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
MM-6. To the extent practicable, removal of large trees with cavities, crevices, or snags shall occur before bat maternity colonies form (i.e., prior to March 1) or after young are volant (i.e., after August 31). If construction (including the removal of large trees) occurs during the bat non-volant season (March 1 through August 31), a qualified professional shall conduct a pre-construction survey of the study area to locate maternity colonies and identify measures to protect colonies from disturbance. The preconstruction survey will be performed no more than 7 days prior to the implementation of construction activities. If a maternity colony is located within or adjacent to the study area, a disturbance free buffer shall be established by a qualified professional, in consultation with CDFW, to ensure the colony is protected from project activities.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
MM-7. To the extent practicable, removal of riparian brush will occur outside of the maternal denning period (i.e., July 1–April 30). If vegetation removal is to occur during the maternal denning period (May 1–June 30), a qualified biologist will conduct a preconstruction survey of the study area to locate maternity dens and identify measures to protect the maternity dens from disturbance. The preconstruction survey will be performed no more than seven days prior to the vegetation removal.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
MM-8. High visibility fencing, flagging, or markers will be installed along the edges of the work zone near culturally sensitive zone to prevent damage or unauthorized access.

Construction City/
Construction
Management
Packet Pg. 289 Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring And Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(a)--Canter Court

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to the City of Redding’s Downtown Parking Program:
(1) Add an annual parking fee holiday for the Asphalt Cowboys’ Pancake Breakfast event on the Friday of Rodeo Week;
(2) Add a bi-annual parking fee holiday for Election Day on the Tuesday after the first Monday of November;
(3) Adopt Resolution to amend the Traffic Control Map as noted on Exhibit A and below:
(a) Modify certain areas of Oregon Street, between Shasta and Eureka Way to establish a two-hour parking zone;
(b) Add a loading zone for the two parking stalls on the south side of Placer Road to the immediate west of Court Street; and
(4) Find that the action is exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to 14 CCR 15061(b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption).

Fiscal Impact
The City of Redding’s (City) parking system requires payment during weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., with an exception for holidays. The current parking rate is $1 per hour. Not collecting a parking fare, systemwide, for ten hours on a weekday is anticipated to result in a loss of revenue of approximately $1,600 per day.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to adopt this Resolution and provide staff with alternative direction.

If Council chooses not to accept this resolution, attendees of the Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast and potentially voters on election day would be required to pay to park, or park a few blocks away and walk to the event.

MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--Add Parking Fee Holidays and make minor amendments to the Redding Parking Program and adopt Resolution to amend the City of Redding Traffic Control Map.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 290
Report to Redding City Council October 7, 2024
Re: 4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking Page 2 Background/Analysis
At its regular meeting on May 7, 2024, the Council adopted a one-time parking fee holiday for the 2024 Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast event. Council had asked staff at that meeting to bring back an annual adoption of the parking holiday.

The Asphalt Cowboys have been serving the community with the annual pancake breakfast since the 1950s. This event is well recognized and attracts nearly 10,000 participants as well as dozens of volunteers and support personnel. In the last few years, the event relocated from Market Street in front of the Cascade Theatre to the newly reintroduced section of Market Street between Butte and Yuba Streets. The Asphalt Cowboys have pointed out that they have been working with the Downtown Parking program since they developed their iconic logo, with a mule tied to an expired parking meter. They would like to continue this partnership long-term with the establishment of the annual parking holiday.

The Shasta County Elections office has also requested that Election Day be a parking fee holiday. Election day is statutorily set by the U.S. government as "the Tuesday next after the first Monday in November", i.e. the Tuesday that occurs within November 2 to November 8. This holiday would only occur on even-numbered years to be consistent with the Presidential, House, Senate, and local elections. The election office located at 1643 Market Street sees approximately 3,000 voters utilize their office to cast a vote on election day. They have requested that Election Day be set as a holiday as not to deter any voters coming to the election office. A parking holiday would also affect the polling place located at the Veterans Hall on Yuba Street.

While a parking holiday for these events appear to be a benefit to the event attendees, it should be considered that these parking holidays attract a large influx of long-term parkers, mainly downtown area employees, that exceed the two-hour parking limit and occupy parking spaces all day. Staff has observed the parking supply for other officially recognized holidays and found that most downtown businesses and their employees compete for the available parking spaces on those days. There is a potential for a larger parking issue for these events and local businesses but that impact is currently unknown. Staff will continue to monitor these holidays and determine if other options are available to accommodate these events in a more beneficial manner.

Staff has also received requests to amend parking regulations to address specific business needs.

The first is to add a two-hour parking zone on Oregon Street north of Shasta Street to Eureka Way. The renovation of the building at the northeast corner of Shasta Street and Oregon Street has added new businesses in an area that currently has thriving existing business. This block has limited parking resources and does not currently have any parking regulations. In order to support short term office clients, restaurant uses, and retail on that block, a two-hour parking zone is being requested to remain consistent with the parking system goal to ensure parking availability and turnover for the downtown business community. The all-day office users would be able to utilize the new four-hour zones south of Shasta Street on Oregon Street or privately leased parking lots in the area or pay for an employee parking pass. This block is outside the paid parking zone so it would be a free two-hour parking zone to encourage parking turnover to provide more availability for customers for all businesses located on this block.

Packet Pg. 291
Report to Redding City Council October 7, 2024
Re: 4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking Page 3 The second request is a new loading zone on the corner of Placer Street and Court Street. The Downtown Liquor Market that faces Placer Street, has requested a loading zone to help accommodate deliveries, and prohibit all-day users parking in front of the store. The new striping of Placer Road, has allocated additional lane widths for parking in this block. The store has requested that the two spaces on Placer closest to Court Street be loading only. Staff reviewed the request and found it consistent with the practice to allow a couple loading spaces at major corners.

Environmental Review
Staff has reviewed this action and determined that it is exempt from review under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15061(b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption.

CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the action may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The City has an existing paid parking zone that is being modified. The proposed modifications will affect the locations of parked vehicles and may encourage mode shift, carpooling and transit use.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
• Government of the 21st Century - “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Resolution
^Resolution Exhibit A
^Notice of Exemption
Previous Staff Report 5-7-24
Packet Pg. 292
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

ADDING TWO FREE PARKING DAYS FOR DOWNTOWN PARKING,
ADDING A 2-HOUR PARKING ZONE ON OREGON STREET AND,
ADDING A LOADING ZONE ON PLACER ROAD.

WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code (CVC) Section 22507 provides that a local government may, by ordinance or resolution, restrict the stopping, parking, or standing of vehicles on certain streets or highways, or portions thereof, during all or certain hours of the day; and WHEREAS, Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Section 11.24.170 provides that the City Council may, by resolution, establish time limited parking zones for such days and periods of time deemed necessary as shown on the Traffic Control Map established pursuant to the provisions of RMC Section 11.04.020; and
WHEREAS, RMC Section 11.28.020 provides that the City Council may, as traffic conditions require, designate, modify or eliminate by resolution paid parking zones upon such streets or portions of streets of the City. The areas, streets and portions of streets designated as paid parking zones shall be depicted on the Traffic Control Map adopted pursuant to RMC Section 11.04.020; and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL THAT:

1. The recitals set forth herein are true and correct.

2. Pursuant to RMC Section 11.24.170 and 11.24.120, the City Council a. Adds the 2-Hour parking zone on the east and west side of Oregon Street from Shasta Street north to Eureka Way,
b. Adds a loading zone on two parking spaces on the south side of Placer Road immediately west of Court St. as shown on the Traffic Control Map.

3. Pursuant to RMC Section 11.28.060, the City Council may vary hours of operation of the parking program.
a. Add an annual free parking day on the Friday of Rodeo Week, which is usually the third week in May.
b. Add a bi-annual free parking day on Election day, on the Tuesday after the first Monday of November on even years.

4. The City Engineer shall cause to be signed and marked any areas noted on Exhibit A, in accordance with RMC Section 11.28.030, and amend the Traffic Control Map adopted pursuant to RMC Section 11.04.020 to account for the change in parking established herein.

5. Amendment of the Traffic Control Map is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), per Section 15601(b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption. CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. It can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the actions may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, the Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking) activities are not subject to CEQA.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 15th day of October, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
Tenessa Audette, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
________________________________ ____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking) Lot #20
116 Spaces
EXHIBIT "A"
October 15, 2024
4-Hour Parking Zone
Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: ^Resolution Exhibit A (4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking) Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: ^Notice of Exemption (4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the City Engineer to implement a Parking Fee Holiday from 8:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m., on Friday, May 17, 2024, for the annual Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast held in Downtown Redding.

Fiscal Impact
The City of Redding’s (City) parking system requires payment during weekdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., with an exception for holidays. The current parking rate is $1 per hour. Not collecting a parking fare, systemwide, for four hours on a weekday is anticipated to result in a loss of revenue of no more than $800.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to approve the Parking Fee Holiday and continue with the paid parking system during the time of the Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast (Pancake Breakfast).

Background/Analysis
The Asphalt Cowboys have been serving the community with the annual pancake breakfast since the 1950s. This event is well recognized and attracts nearly 10,000 participants as well as dozens of volunteers and support personnel. In the last few years, the event relocated from Market Street in front of the Cascade Theatre to the newly reintroduced section of Market Street between Butte and Yuba Streets.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Implement a Parking Fee Holiday for Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking) Report to Redding City Council April 30, 2024
Re: 4.11(d)--Parking Fee Holiday for Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast Page 2 With the new parking strategy being implemented for just over a year in the Downtown area, the Asphalt Cowboys’ organization remains concerned that paid parking may hinder community participation for the event. The Asphalt Cowboys’ organization has submitted the attached letter requesting the City not to charge for parking in the downtown core during the event hours, for not only this year, but also for future instances of the event. At its regular meeting on May 2, 2023, Council approved a Paid Parking Holiday for the 2023 annual pancake breakfast.

Feedback to staff from community members indicated that the stay on paid parking largely affected their attendance at the event. With the positive feedback received from the community, staff remains supportive of the annual request, as this event is truly unique in both size and scale as well as the long-standing tradition the citizens of Redding expect and support. It will not be the intent of staff to entertain similar requests for events in the future that are smaller in scale and do not meet the same time-honored tradition standards as the pancake breakfast. Staff is considering bringing forth an Ordinance at the next parking program update later in the year for Council to consider a permanent parking holiday for the annual pancake breakfast along with other necessary changes to the parking strategy.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Pancake Breakfast Parking Request
Previous Staff Report

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking) APPROVED Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking) Est. t 953
Reddin 9
Est. 1953
Reddin 9
Est. 1953
Reddin 9

APPROVED
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 301 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor GI " Y F

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE: May 2, 2023 FROM: Chuck Aukland, Public
ITEM NO. 4. 11( e) Works Director
APPROVED BY***
caukland@ci. redding. ca. us
N,,
r
r}' spPin, Ci ana 4r'2/ 2423
btippin@cityofredding. org
SUBJECT: 4. 11( e)-- Implement a Parking Fee Holiday for Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast
Recommendation
Authorize staff to implement a Parking Fee Holiday from 8: 00 a. m. to 12: 00 p. m., on Friday, May 19, 2023, for the annual Asphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast held in Downtown Redding.

Fiscal Impact
The City' s parking system requires payment during weekdays from 8: 00 a.m. to 6: 00 p.m., with an exception for holidays. The current parking rate is $ 1 per hour. Not collecting a parking fare, systemwide, for four hours on a weekday will result in a loss of revenue of less than $ 800.

Alter native Action
The City Council ( Council) may choose not to approve the Parking Fee Holiday and continue with the paid parking system during the time of the breakfast.

Background/Analysis
The Asphalt Cowboys have been serving the community with the annual pancake breakfast since the 1950s. This event is we11 recognized and attracts nearly 10, 000 participants as well as dozens of volunteers and support personnel. In the few years, the event relocated from Market Street in front of the Cascade Theatre to the newly reintroduced section of Market Street between Butte and Yuba Streets.

With the parking strategy relatively new to the Downtown area, the Asphalt Cowboys organization is concerned that paid parking may hinder community participation for the event. It has submitted the attached letter requesting the City not to charge for parking in the downtown core during the event hours, for not only this year but for the future instances of the event. While there are concerns related to preeedenee, staff is supportive of the request as this event is truly unique in both size and scale as we11 as the long- standing tradition the citizens of Redding expect

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking) Report to Redding City Council Apri127, 2023
Re: 4.11( e)-- Parking Fee Holiday forAsphalt Cowboys Pancake Breakfast Page 2 and support. It will not be the intent of staff to entertain similar requests for events in the future that are smaller in scale and do not meet the same time- honored tradition standards as the pancake breakfast. The Council will be asked to consider a more permanent approval of this arrangement at a future Council meeting after the planned presentation of the parking program efficacy at some time this summer.

EnviNonmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/ City Manager Goals
This is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Asphalt Cowboys Letter

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking) Apr l 18, 202
H ar carable May r CWqicha) C a quistca,
As the Chairrnan c f the 9' Annual A halt r rbc y a ke re kf st, I vu ul lik t invit y u, yc ar fe l a r out ilrn mb s, n l , a yaurcl sest fri ds r
nj y
th inest par ca es erv anyw ere
in i t Ca nt tF is ir g Friday, iViay 1
t', 2. s has E e r tt traditi n f r g r ra oros f
Re[ ding f r ilies; ir gl ac tca the 195{' s,, r ntend t ald the Par cake Bre kf sf in fihe heart of tl s.rrrt rwr Red ing,
As i v rr c v r taas ev l ed, s h ve t e A ah lt r utiib ts L s y r u+# it d a rel ate t bre kfast
a fewv rlcack r c tih ta th n v4r6y c n sec ic n c f ket t., pr vi a asl re rred t as# h awt t wn mail and d wr c wn pr rr en d. As cha ng h v ccurr d in th dov ntourr re, s m c ll nges hav aris s tivell. Th city hi s r nt1y dr p e par C ng stra tegy r he d aunt wn are ir rec nt m r tl s. ue t t sh e€ It rn ca cit zens that tend th ar akfast iear y 1fl, Q0a ach ye r r re I rav seria s c a c rns that th p
r n st ategy ac apted fo- ar al re kday u ne ay r a t be the rn st effec ve str t gy for a large peci! ot bli vent of thi size, rr# v ri a s nder r ce i; ev nt"s de r an Ic ng- rm wi bility.- lon with the c nstant lo d' in, a lo ing, a d at r ri acar r us v h c durin, h v r t; we are c c rned that c rata ans erill imp ct i a+ n ell.

In h r Athe Aspl alt c vt sys ar r questing t e R a ing Gity Cc c B d cl re a p r 6ng hali ay an Frit y, May t' 2 3 h s asper d& i parking ar d p rking nf r m n r that d y, c r at lea t ur til pr. 11Vde vv auld Is+( ike t rer u st a ac li y b put n la e to ext r d th s rar Cing f aliday t fut re it s crf the Asphalt Cc w oy' s€ an k r akfast.` f i js r uak ly th larg st, nd mc s v«r el- krr nrn siro l pe k 9ic ev nt in the City of Fted i
in any given year nd it is n hc nrar c have t d w t wra. F r 7 y
ars-t e C6ty ar the Aspha[ t Cc wboys have,+r arked t
ther tt s ag s n th r g th t is r ly ta qt
fi+.- our cc rnmur bty an e hc pt at r i iai c n n in e; h k y u f+r y ur cc nsid ratiran.

Ssnc'
d
C m rflr 11dii let n
C irrr n
6# gh Ar nua[ Asptaalt c vrrbcays P I fas

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(b)--Annual Parking Fee Holidays and Minor Amendments to Parking)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize termination of the California Natural Resources Agency’s Urban Flood Protection Grant for the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project; and authorize the City Manager to sign the grant termination letter.

Fiscal Impact
Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project (Project) costs to date total $355,000. Upon the Urban Flood Protection Grant Program (Grant) termination, the California Natural Resources Agency’s (CNRA) will reimburse the City of Redding (City) approximately $300,000 of the project expenses. The remainder is funded by Public Works’ Storm Drain Utility Impact Fee.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to terminate the grant and proceed with completion of the design for the project. However, it is unlikely the City would be able to obtain the necessary environmental permits to proceed with construction of the project. If the project proceeds and cannot be completed, the City could be required to return a portion of the grant funds to CNRA.

Background/Analysis
On April 7, 2020, Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-40 authorizing the Public Works Department to submit an application for Proposition 68 Urban Flood Protection funds for the Project. Staff was successful in securing grant funding in the amount of $2,295,100. On May 17, 2022, Council approved the grant funding and adopted Budget Resolution No. 2021-07 to appropriate the funds. On November 15, 2022, Council authorized a Consulting and Professional Services Contract for Engineering and Environmental Services with Geosyntec Consultants Inc. (Geosyntec) for the Project, and adopted Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $152,020 of Storm Drain Impact Fees.

MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 305
Report to Redding City Council October 7, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant Page 2
The project would have utilized existing abandoned wastewater treatment ponds (ponds) to reduce flooding at Boulder Creek Elementary School, enhance environmental habitat, provide water quality treatment, and provide recreational and educational opportunities in a severely disadvantaged community. The project was identified as the City’s highest priority storm water treatment project in the City of Redding Storm Water Resource Plan.

To support the design and construction of the project, the City and Geosyntec conducted soil sampling in August 2023 and water sampling in January 2024. The samples were collected to determine whether there are potential wastewater-associated chemicals of interest that could potentially impact water quality and aquatic organisms within Boulder Creek when upstream creek flows are routed through the ponds and back into Boulder Creek. The chemical constituents in the soil and water samples were statistically compared to those in Boulder Creek for a better understanding of whether the concentrations were reflective of background levels upstream in Boulder Creek. The soil and water samples were analyzed for concentrations of perand polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS).

The analytical analysis indicated that PFOA (subset of PFAS) concentrations were detected in the northern pond soil and water, and that the PFOS (subset of PFAS) concentration was statistically elevated in the northern pond relative to Boulder Creek. PFAS is everywhere in our environment and due to the rising public and governmental concern regarding PFAS, it has been determined that the project should not move forward.

The guidelines and regulatory actions in regards to PFAS have not been finalized; however, the local Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) was notified of the findings and provided with a copy of all analytical data. The RWQCB responded that they would keep the information on file and had no further recommendations or requirements at this time.

Due to the statistically elevated levels of PFOA and PFOS in the northern pond and the uncertainty of future regulations in response to PFAS, it was determined the best course of action would be to terminate the project and the grant. Staff notified the CNRA of the analytical findings and the suggested course of action. The CNRA concurred, deemed the City’s actions associated with the project had been taken in good faith, and agreed to reimburse the City for project expenses incurred prior to May 8, 2024.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^BoulderCreek Flood Protection Termination Letter
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report-11-15-22
Previous Staff Report 5-17-22
Previous Staff Report-04-07-20
Packet Pg. 306
Melissa Jones
October 1, 2024

Page 2 ends

Public Works
Engineering Division
530.225.4170
530.245.7024
October 1, 2024
Melissa Jones
Program Manager
California Natural Resources Agency
715 P Street, 20th Floor
Sacramento, CA 95814
SUBJECT: Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project (UF8806-0) Dear Ms. Jones:

Thank you for selecting the City of Redding (City) as a recipient of the Urban Flood Protection Grant Program (Grant).

As discussed during the May 8, 2024, telephone meeting, to support the design and construction of the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project (Project), the City and Geosyntec Consultants conducted soil sampling in August 2023 and water sampling in January 2024. The soil and water samples were analyzed for concentrations of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The analytical analysis indicated that PFOA and PFOS (subsets of PFAS) concentrations were elevated, and considering the rising public and governmental concern of PFAS levels in our environment, it would be highly improbable that environmental permits would be issued for a project that would transport a higher concentration of PFAS into Boulder Creek.

Due to the elevated levels of PFOA and PFOS at the project site, the uncertainty of future regulations in response to PFAS, and the inability to obtain the necessary environmental permits to construct the Project, it was determined the best course of action would be to terminate the Project.

The City hereby requests termination of the Grant. Upon agreement of this termination, the City will submit to the California Natural Resources Agency our first and final reimbursement package for project costs up to May 8, 2024 for payment. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Sincerely,
Barry W. Tippin, City Manager
c: Amber Kelley, Environmental Compliance Manager
Tracy Wyhlidko, Industrial Waste Supervisor
Josh Vandiver, Wastewater Utility Manager
Seth Dressler, Neighborhood Preservation Officer, Code Enforcement Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: ^BoulderCreek Flood Protection Termination Letter (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban

ALAMINE DR

REDDINGTON DR DAVIS RIDGE RD

BODENHAMER BLVD

MILL VALLEY PKWY

BETHEL LN

FAIR HILL DR

ROSEWOOD DR

BELVEDERE DR

ROLLINGVIEW DR

TEAKWOOD DR

CAMPERS CT

GRANTS PASS PL

ROGUE RIVER WAY

DURANGO WAY

STINSON LOOP

GREENBRIAR CT

ARBUCKLE CT
I 5 NB OFFRAMP

MILL VALLEY PKWY

REDDINGTON DR
INTERSTATE 5
STE HWY 299

COLLEGEVIEWDR
MICACT

BOULDERCRE
E
K
D
R
A
H

NLANDCT
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT

GIS DIVISION LOCATION MAP
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400Feet

FORMER SEWER PONDS

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 5310, to provide environmental and engineering services for the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project (Project):
(1) Award the Consultant and Professional Services Contract (Contract) to Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. (Geosyntec), in an amount not to exceed $497,013; (2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Contract with Geosyntec Consultants, Inc.; (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve Contract amendments not to exceed $50,000; and (4) Adopt Resolution adopting and approving the 71st Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $152,020 of Storm Drain Impact Fees.

Fiscal Impact
The required professional services to prepare the project for construction is estimated to cost approximately $497,013. Of this amount, $345,000 will be funded by California Natural Resource Agency’s Urban Flood Protection Grant (adopted in the 41st Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078). The original grant application submitted in June 2020 estimated this portion of the project to be $345,000. However, rising inflation costs and additional required scope items has increased costs overall. Consequently, the remaining $152,013 will be funded by Storm Drain Impact Fees with approval of the attached resolution.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the contract for this project. This alternative would require the City of Redding (City) to decline $2,295,100 in Proposition 68 grant funds to the California Natural Resources Agency, and the Boulder Creek Project would not be completed.

MEETING DATE: November 15, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(g)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(g)--Award Request for Proposal Schedule No. 5310 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for Engineering and Environmental Services for the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project and Adopt Budget Resolution Appropriating Storm Drain Impact Fee funds.

Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Report to Redding City Council November 9, 2022
Re: 4.11(g)--Award RFP Schedule No. 5310 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Page 2
Background/Analysis
On April 7, 2020, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-40 authorizing the Public Works Department to apply for Proposition 68 Urban Flood Protection funds for the Boulder Creek Project. Staff was successful in securing grant funding in the amount of $2,295,100. On May 17, 2022, the Council approved the grant funding and adopted Budget Resolution No. 2021-07 to appropriate the funds.

The Boulder Creek Project would utilize existing abandoned wastewater treatment ponds to reduce flooding at Boulder Creek Elementary School, improve water quality and environmental habitat, and provide recreational and educational opportunities in a disadvantaged community.

An inlet spillway will be constructed along the bank of Boulder Creek to divert stormflows from the 1,800-acre drainage area, consisting of 80 percent urban land uses, into two sedimentation basins. The sedimentation basins will capture and detain wet weather flows and provide an opportunity for settling of sediment and particulate-bound pollutants, as well as provide trash capture. The flow will then be diverted into a third bio-retention pond and released back into Boulder Creek. A series of pedestrian trails and signs will be constructed around the three basins.

The trails will be connected to the City’s Northeast Crossing Trail project. The Boulder Creek Project was identified as the City’s highest priority storm water treatment project in the City of Redding Storm Water Resource Plan.

Consultant Selection Process
A RFP was issued, and one proposal was received and opened on August 3, 2022. Three Public Works Department staff members formed a review and selection panel. The panel’s evaluation was based on the RFP selection criteria and the consultants’ abilities and qualifications to perform all phases of the engineering and environmental services required. The panel members evaluated and scored the proposal based on the consultant’s understanding of the project scope, project’s team experience with similar types of projects and City projects, qualifications of the project team, ability to stay on budget and meet project schedule, familiarity with local setting and context, and geographic location of the project team. The selection panel determined that Geosyntec is a qualified firm that is able to provide the required services for this project.

Following the evaluation, Geosyntec’s fee proposal was opened, evaluated, and subsequently negotiated based on the services required. Geosyntec’s proposed fee of $497,013 is reasonable for the scope of services and staff believes that Geosyntec is a highly qualified team that will succeed in providing the required services.

This agreement has been approved to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. The consultant will provide design and technical study information necessary to ensure environmental clearance as the project progresses.

Packet Pg. 310 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Report to Redding City Council November 9, 2022
Re: 4.11(g)--Award RFP Schedule No. 5310 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Page 3
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Consulting & Professional Services Contract
4-7-20 Previous Staff Report
5-17-22 Previous Staff Report
Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) RESOLUTION NO. 2022-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 71ST AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2021-078 TO APPROPRIATE $152,020 FOR BOULDER CREEK FLOOD PROTECTION AND NATURAL TREATMENT PROJECT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-23

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
147 809 Storm Drain $152,020
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Beginning Balance
147-801-01-0001-01 Beginning Balance $ 152,020
Increase Expenditures
147-809-4895-10 Boulder Creek Flood $ 152,020
Total $ 152,020 $ 152,020
THAT the purpose is to appropriate $152,020 for Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project for fiscal year 2022-23.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 15th day of November, 2022, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

KRISTEN SCHREDER, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant)

ALAMINE DR

REDDINGTON DR DAVIS RIDGE RD

BODENHAMER BLVD

MILL VALLEY PKWY

BETHEL LN

FAIR HILL DR

ROSEWOOD DR

BELVEDERE DR

ROLLINGVIEW DR

TEAKWOOD DR

CAMPERS CT

GRANTS PASS PL

ROGUE RIVER WAY

DURANGO WAY

STINSON LOOP

GREENBRIAR CT

ARBUCKLE CT
I 5 NB OFFRAMP

MILL VALLEY PKWY

REDDINGTON DR
INTERSTATE 5
STE HWY 299

COLLEGEVIEWDR
MICACT

BOULDERCRE
E
K
D
R
A
H

NLANDCT
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT

GIS DIVISION LOCATION MAP
DATE PRODUCED: - 0 200 400Feet

FORMER SEWER PONDS

NATURAL TREATMENT SYSTEM
901 COLLEGE VIEW DRIVE & 500 DAVIS RIDGE ROAD
AP# 116-180-006 & 117-070-028
MARCH 23, 2020
P:\Environmental Management\ProProjects\FormerSewerPondsProject.aprx Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Consulting and Professional Services Agreement Page 1
Rev. 6/15

CITY OF REDDING

CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT

THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Geosyntec Consulting, Inc. (“Consultant”) for the purpose of coordinated project management for the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project.

WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:

SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.

SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed Four Hundred Ninety-Seven Thousand Thirteen Dollars ($497,013). This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be itemized to reflect the employees performing the requested tasks, the billing rate for each employee and the hours worked.

C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.

D. Pursuant to Section 1781 of the Labor Code, Consultant is advised that the work contemplated in this contract (Exhibit A Task 4 and Task 5) is subject to the payment of prevailing wages and all other requirements of the Prevailing Wage Law. The prevailing wage of each job classification may be found by inquiry with the California Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall comply with all laws related to the performance of public work including, but not limited to, the employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 315
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 316
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 317
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 318
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 319
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 320
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 321
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 322
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 323
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 324
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 325
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 326
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 327
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 328
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 329
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 330
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 331
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 332
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 333
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 334
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 335
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
MEETING DATE:

ITEM NO.

April 7, 2020

4. ll(g)
FROM: Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
3/30/202
SUBJECT: 4.1 l(g)--Adopt Resolution Approving City of Redding as Applicant for Urban Flood Protection Grant for Boulder Creek
Recommendation
Authorize the following action relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project:
(1) Adopt Resolution approving the City of Redding (City) as an applicant for the Urban Flood Protection Grant Program (Proposition 68), administered by the California Natural Resources Agency; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant be awarded.

Fiscal Impact
The grant application will request up to $2 million to create a flood management and stormwater treatment system at the abandoned Buckeye Wastewater Treatment Plant. Although no local matching funds are required by the grant agency, funding contributions are highly encouraged and will increase the application's competiveness. Staff anticipates contributing in-kind services performed by the City's Storm Water Management Program (SWMP). The SWMP positions are funded through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Fixed Fee Charge and the General Fund would not be impacted. There would be no short-term fiscal impact as a result of approving and authorizing as recommended.

Long-term maintenance costs for this project are minimal. The trails, landscape, and signs would be maintained by Park Maintenance Division staff, supplemented with volunteers when possible.

The projected annual cost for waste management, weed abatement, occasional pruning and hazardous tree removal is estimated at $1,800 per year and would be absorbed within the current Park Maintenance Division budget. Infrastructure maintenance and repair would be funded by the NPDES Fixed Fee Charge.

Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 1, 2020
Re: 4.11(g)--Resolution Approving City as Applicant/or Urban Flood Protection Grant/or Boulder Creek Page 2
Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to direct staff not to apply for funds under this grant program, or provide staff with alternative direction.

Backgrou11d/Analysis
The Urban Flood Management Program, funded by voter approved Proposition 68, focuses on multi-benefit projects that address flooding in urbanized areas. Projects must include storm water capture and reuse, planning and implementation of low-impact development, restoration of urban streams and watersheds, and increasing permeable surfaces to reduce flooding. The California Natural Resources Agency administers the grant and has allocated $87.5 million for these projects.

The Public Works Department (Department) seeks to submit an application to this program for the design, permitting, engineering, and construction of a flood management and storm water treatment system located on City-owned open space. In recent years, this project has been the subject of planning efforts, and extensive community review. The Department's Storm Water Resource Plan identified the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project (Project) as the highest priority multi-benefit treatment project for the City. The project was developed in collaboration with a Technical Advisory Group (including State regulators) and a Stakeholder Group comprised of other government agencies, non-governmental organizations, environmental groups, community members, and other interested parties.

The proposed project would utilize existing infrastructure to reduce flooding at Boulder Creek School, improve water quality and environmental habitat, and provide recreational and educational opportunities to a severely disadvantaged community. An inlet spillway along Boulder Creek bank will divert stormflows from the 1,800-acre drainage area, consisting of 80 percent urban land uses, into two sedimentation basins (abandoned wastewater treatment ponds).

The sedimentation basins will provide capture and detention of wet weather flows, as well as provide an opportunity for settling of sediment and particulate-bound pollutants, and trash capture before diversion into a third bio-retention pond and release back into Boulder Creek.

Boulder Creek School, located less than a mile downstream of the project area, experiences at least one flood event each year. The school field, track, playground, and eastern parking lot become inundated with floodwater, limiting outdoor activity areas for the children and causing thousands of dollars in damage. The project is anticipated to reduce the frequency and intensity of flood events, as initial modeling shows that the one-year peak flow rate can be reduced to one quarter of the current rate.

A series of trails and signs will be constructed around the three basins and they will be connected to the City's Northeast Crossing Trail project, which is a grant funded project being implemented by the Community Services Department. The Project also includes native tree planting, invasive species removal, and floodplain restoration. An existing building from the wastewater treatment plant and a concrete-lined pond, both located within the 100-year flood plain, will be demolished, and the flood plain area will be restored. Construction is anticipated to occur by 2024.

Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 1, 2020
Re: 4.11 (g)--Resolution Approving City as Applicant for Urban Flood Protection Grant for Boulder Creek Page 3
The grant application will request up to $2 million for the design and construction of the proposed project and must be submitted by April 8, 2020. The effort to complete the application process includes documenting the flooding issues, sourcing support letters, documenting community outreach activities, and quantifying the flood management and water quality benefits.

Taking the recommended action will allow the City to compete for funds for this multi-benefit project.

The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Resolution
Project Concept Sheet
Location Map
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) RESOLUTION NO. 2020

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A GRANT APPLICATION FOR

URBAN FLOOD PROTECTION GRANT FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE THE

APPLICATION AND ALL SUBSEQUENT DOCUMENTATION TO
OBTAIN PROPOSITION 68 FUNDING
WHEREAS, the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have provided funds for the program shown above; and
WHEREAS, The California Natural Resources Agency has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of this grant program, establishing necessary procedures; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Natural Resources Agency require a resolution certifying the approval of application(s) by the Applicant's governing board before submission of said application(s) to the State; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

1. Approves the filing of an application for the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project;

2. Certifies that Applicant understands the assurances and certification in the application;

3. Certifies that Applicant or title holder will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project consistent with the land tenure requirements or will secure the resources to do so;

4. Certifies that it will comply with all provisions of Section 1771.5 ofthe California Labor Code;

5. If applicable, certifies that the project will comply with any laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), legal requirements for building codes, health and safety codes, and disabled access laws and that prior to commencement of construction all applicable permits will have been obtained;

6. Certifies that Applicant will work towards the State Planning Priorities intended to promote equity, strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and promote public health and safety as included in Government Code Section 65041.1; Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant)

7. Appoints the City Manager, or designee, as agent to conduct all negotiations, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, payment requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned project.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the i 11 day of April, 2020, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ADAM McELVAIN, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

PAMELA MIZE, Secretary BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Project Overview
. Parcel Ownership City of Redding
APN 116180006000,
Project Drainage Area
Transportation Commercial Education
y 13% 7.7% 1.6%
iin n Spnce 117070028000 21 0
·ainage Area Soil Type Hydrologic Soil Group C
Watershed Churn Creek iotprint Sacramento River
Singleundary Family Mul'.i-Fa~ily Receiving Water Boulder Creek Residential · Res1dent1al
31% 11% Groundwater Basin Enterprise
te: Proposed roiect is conceotual and subject to chanqe based on future feasibilitv ·assessment. fundinq availability, and/or other information.

Project Description
This project plans to revitalize existing infrastructure to allow treatment, groundwater recharge, and flood management th1 natural treatment systems, possibly including: infiltration b wetlands, bioretention basins, etc. The abandoned sewer pc adjacent to Boulder Creek, which is a salmonid strear
significant runoff from areas considered high priority for tra control. Water will be diverted from Boulder Creek just after the 1-5 freeway and flow through the treatment system befc into Boulder Creek. The upper basin will be expanded
pretreatment area while the lower basin will retain its c Vegetation, walking paths, and interpretive signage will be inc Potential Site Constraints:

The basin area should be inspected prior to finalizing the ~ confirm no protected species are present. Also necessary ecc flows within Boulder Creek along the project location should assist with the design of the project. Numerous permits/age1 may be need to implement the project (RWQCB, CDFW, Arm
Flood Control, Caltrans, etc). A site survey should be cond1 local elevations, infiltration rate, and groundwater elevations.

Example Natural Treatment System in Construct
Former Sewer Ponds
Natural Treatment System
Project Concept
Santa Barbara
City of Redding
Stormwater Resource Plan
Geosyntec 1>
consultants
April 2018
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Project Design Information
>ody BMP Footprint BMPType Natural Treatment System
Drain CJ Parcel Boundary
Total Project Footprint
Depth
13 acres (includes 3.3 acres pretreatment)
3-9 ft (includes 1 ft freeboard)
1iversion ---+ Direction of Flow Storage Volume 41 ac-ft Assumed Infiltration Rate 0.32 in/hr
Stormwater Source Boulder Creek
roiect is conceptual and subject to chanqe based on future feasibilitv assessment. fundinq availabilitv. and/or other information.

Project Benefits
All benefits are expressed as an average annual estimate based on historical Overall Multi-Benefit Score Water Quality:

Highest possible score is a 5 Pollutant load reductions f1

Reduced
TSS
(lbs)
N03
(lbs)
Dissolved Cu
if (lbs)
.J Fr.c~J Coliform
(MPN)
Flootl 0% 25%
Environmental Enhancements: Restored vegetation will I
include native species increasing habitat for animals of · interest. ,
Flood Management: 920 acre-feet (38%) of the annual
runoff volume and 89% of the volume generated from an 85th percentile 24-hr storm will be captured and slowly released back into Boulder Creek, likely reducing the frequency and intensity of flood events downstream.

Community Enhancements: This project is located along
the proposed Boulder Creek Trail. Signage to educate the public about the project's multiple benefits, and native vegetation and landscaping will improve the aesthetics of the parcel while providing recreational opportunities.

Water Supply: 260 acre-feet will be recharged annually, which i:
supply for 640 households.

Volume Capture Analysis
85th Percentile,
24-hrStorm
Precipitation (in) 0.91
Runoff Volume (ac-ft) 59
Percent of Runoff Volume Captured (%) 89
Total Volume Captured (ac-ft) 53
Former Sewer Ponds
Natural Treatment System
Project Concept
City of Redding
Stormwater-Resource Plan
Geosyntec t>
consuItan ts
Santa Barbara I April 2018
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources N GIS DIVISION LOCATION MAP MTG. DATE:

W+E INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED: FORMER SEWER PONDS ITEM:

MARCH 23, 2020

NATURAL TREATMENT SYSTEM
s 0 200 400 Feet 901 COLLEGE VIEW DRIVE & 500 DAVIS RIDGE ROAD ATIACHMENT: --I P:\Environme ntat Management\ProProjects\FormerSewerPondsProject .aprx AP# 116-180-006 & 117-070-028 Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept $2,295,100 in Urban Flood Protection Grant funds; and adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 41st Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2021-078 appropriating $2,295,100 in funds for the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project.

Fiscal Impact
The total project costs are estimated to be $2,418,900. The grant will provide funding in the amount of $2,295,100. The remaining funds will come from previously budgeted in-kind staff time ($73,800) and Wastewater funds ($50,000).

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may chose not to accept the Urban Flood Protection Grant funds or approve the budget resolution. The City of Redding (City) would lose $2,295,100 in grant funds and the project may not be completed.

Background/Analysis
On April 7, 2020, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-40 allowing the City to apply for Proposition 68 Urban Flood Protection Grant for the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment System Project (Boulder Creek Project). The Council also authorized the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant be awarded. On September 7, 2021, the City was notified that the California Natural Resources Agency had selected the City to receive a grant in the amount of $2,295,100.

The Boulder Creek Project would utilize existing infrastructure to reduce flooding at Boulder Creek School, improve water quality and environmental habitat, and provide recreational and educational opportunities to a severely disadvantaged community. An inlet spillway along MEETING DATE: May 17, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Accept Urban Flood Protection Grant Funds and Adopt Budget Resolution Appropriating Funds
Ryan Bailey, Assistant
Director of Public Works
Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Report to Redding City Council May 8, 2022
Re: 4.11(d)--Accept Grant Funds and Adopt Resolution Page 2 Boulder Creek bank will divert stormflows from the 1,800-acre drainage area, consisting of 80 percent urban land uses, into two sedimentation basins (abandoned wastewater treatment ponds).

The sedimentation basins will provide capture and detention of wet weather flows, as well as provide an opportunity for settling of sediment and particulate-bound pollutants and trash capture before diversion into a third bio-retention pond and release back into Boulder Creek.

A series of trails and signs will be constructed around the three basins and they will be connected to the City's Northeast Crossing Trail project, which is a grant funded project being implemented by the Community Services Department. The project also includes native tree planting, invasive species removal, and floodplain restoration. An existing building from the wastewater treatment plant and a concrete-lined pond, both located within the 100-year flood plain, will be demolished, and the flood plain area will be restored. Construction is anticipated to occur by 2024.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Resolution
Previous Staff Report 040720
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-11-15-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

The Boulder Creek Project would utilize existing infrastructure to reduce flooding at Boulder Creek School, improve water quality and environmental habitat, and provide recreational and educational opportunities to a severely disadvantaged community. An inlet spillway along MEETING DATE: May 17, 2022
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Accept Urban Flood Protection Grant Funds and Adopt Budget Resolution Appropriating Funds
Ryan Bailey, Assistant
Director of Public Works
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-17-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Report to Redding City Council May 8, 2022
Re: 4.11(d)--Accept Grant Funds and Adopt Resolution Page 2 Boulder Creek bank will divert stormflows from the 1,800-acre drainage area, consisting of 80 percent urban land uses, into two sedimentation basins (abandoned wastewater treatment ponds).

A series of trails and signs will be constructed around the three basins and they will be connected to the City's Northeast Crossing Trail project, which is a grant funded project being implemented by the Community Services Department. The project also includes native tree planting, invasive species removal, and floodplain restoration. An existing building from the wastewater treatment plant and a concrete-lined pond, both located within the 100-year flood plain, will be demolished, and the flood plain area will be restored. Construction is anticipated to occur by 2024.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Resolution
Previous Staff Report 040720
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-17-22 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following action relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project:
1) Adopt Resolution approving the City of Redding ( City) as an applicant for the Urban Flood Protection Grant Program (Proposition 68), administered by the California Natural Resources Agency; and
2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant be awarded.

Fiscal Impact
The grant application will request up to $2 million to create a flood management and stormwater treatment system at the abandoned Buckeye Wastewater Treatment Plant. Although no local matching funds are required by the grant agency, funding contributions are highly encouraged and will increase the application’ s competiveness. Staff anticipates contributing in-kind services performed by the City’s Storm Water Management Program (SWMP). The SWMP positions are funded through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES) Fixed Fee Charge and the General Fund would not be impacted. There would be no short-term fiscal impact as a result of approving and authorizing as recommended.

Long- term maintenance costs for this project are minimal. The trails, landscape, and signs would be maintained by Park Maintenance Division staff, supplemented with volunteers when possible.

MEETING DATE: April 7, 2020
ITEM NO. 4.11(g)
FROM:

APPROVED BY***
[email protected] btippin@cityofredding. org
SUBJECT: 4.11(g)--Adopt Resolution Approving City of Redding as Applicant for Urban Flood Protection Grant for Boulder Creek
Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-07-20 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 1, 2020
Re: 4.11( g)--Resolution Approving City as Applicant for Urban Flood Protection Grant for Boulder Creek Page 2
Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to direct staff not to apply for funds under this grant program, or provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/ Analysis
The Urban Flood Management Program, funded by voter approved Proposition 68, focuses on multi-benefit projects that address flooding in urbanized areas. Projects must include storm water capture and reuse, planning and implementation of low-impact development, restoration of urban streams and watersheds, and increasing permeable surfaces to reduce flooding. The California Natural Resources Agency administers the grant and has allocated $ 87.5 million for these projects.

The Public Works Department (Department) seeks to submit an application to this program for the design, permitting, engineering, and construction of a flood management and storm water treatment system located on City-owned open space. In recent years, this project has been the subject of planning efforts, and extensive community review. The Department’ s Storm Water Resource Plan identified the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project Project) as the highest priority multi- benefit treatment project for the City. The project was developed in collaboration with a Technical Advisory Group (including State regulators) and a Stakeholder Group comprised of other government agencies, non-governmental organizations, environmental groups, community members, and other interested parties.

The proposed project would utilize existing infrastructure to reduce flooding at Boulder Creek School, improve water quality and environmental habitat, and provide recreational and educational opportunities to a severely disadvantaged community. An inlet spillway along Boulder Creek bank will divert stormflows from the 1,800- acre drainage area, consisting of 80 percent urban land uses, into two sedimentation basins (abandoned wastewater treatment ponds).

Boulder Creek School, located less than a mile downstream of the project area, experiences at least one flood event each year. The school field, track, playground, and eastern parking lot become inundated with floodwater, limiting outdoor activity areas for the children and causing thousands of dollars in damage. The project is anticipated to reduce the frequency and intensity of flood events, as initial modeling shows that the one- year peak flow rate can be reduced to one quarter of the current rate.

A series of trails and signs will be constructed around the three basins and they will be connected to the City’ s Northeast Crossing Trail project, which is a grant funded project being implemented by the Community Services Department. The Project also includes native tree planting, invasive species removal, and floodplain restoration. An existing building from the wastewater treatment plant and a concrete-lined pond, both located within the 100-year flood plain, will be demolished, and the flood plain area will be restored. Construction is anticipated to occur by 2024.

Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-07-20 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Report to Redding City Council April 1, 2020
Re: 4.11( g)--Resolution Approving City as Applicant for Urban Flood Protection Grant for Boulder Creek Page 3
The grant application will request up to $ 2 million for the design and construction of the proposed project and must be submitted by April 8, 2020. The effort to complete the application process includes documenting the flooding issues, sourcing support letters, documenting community outreach activities, and quantifying the flood management and water quality benefits.

Taking the recommended action will allow the City to compete for funds for this multi- benefit project.

The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Resolution
Project Concept Sheet
Location Map
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-07-20 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) RESOLUTION NO. 2020-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A GRANT APPLICATION FOR

URBAN FLOOD PROTECTION GRANT FUNDS AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER, OR DESIGNEE, TO EXECUTE THE

APPLICATION AND ALL SUBSEQUENT DOCUMENTATION TO
OBTAIN PROPOSITION 68 FUNDING
WHEREAS, the Legislature and Governor of the State of California have provided funds for the program shown above; and
WHEREAS, The California Natural Resources Agency has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of this grant program, establishing necessary procedures; and WHEREAS, said procedures established by the California Natural Resources Agency require a resolution certifying the approval of application( s) by the Applicant’ s governing board before submission of said application(s) to the State; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant, if selected, will enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the project;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

1. Approves the filing of an application for the Boulder Creek Flood Protection and Natural Treatment Project;

2. Certifies that Applicant understands the assurances and certification in the application;

3. Certifies that Applicant or title holder will have sufficient funds to operate and maintain the project consistent with the land tenure requirements or will secure the resources to do so;

4. Certifies that it will comply with all provisions of Section 1771. 5 of the California Labor Code;

5. If applicable, certifies that the project will comply with any laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the California Environmental Quality Act ( CEQA), legal requirements for building codes, health and safety codes, and disabled access laws and that prior to commencement of construction all applicable permits will have been obtained;

6. Certifies that Applicant will work towards the State Planning Priorities intended to promote equity, strengthen the economy, protect the environment, and promote public health and safety as included in Government Code Section 65041.1; Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-07-20 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant)

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a special meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of April, 2020, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ADAM McELVAIN, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

PAMELA MIZE, Secretary BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-07-20 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-07-20 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant) Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-07-20 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant)

ALAMINEDR

REDDINGTON

DRDAVIS
RIDGE

RDBODENHAMERBLVDMILL VALLEY
L

PKWYBETHEL

NFAIRHILLDRBELVEDE R
DE

RROSEWO
ODD
R

ROLLINGVIEW

DRTEAKWOOD DRCAMPERSCTGRANTS PASS PLROGUE RIVERWAY
DURANGOWAYSTINSONLOOPGREENBRIA NBRCTARBUCKLE CTI5

OFFRAMPMILLVALLEY
PK
W

YREDDIN
G
T O
N

DRINTERSTATE
5STE
HWY
VIEW9DR

COLLEGE
MICA 29

CTBOULDER

CREEK DRHANLAN
DCTMTG.

DATE:ITEM:ATTACHMENT:

LOCATIONMAPGISDIVISIONIFORMATION TECHNOLOGYDEPARTMENTDATEPRODUCED:
0400200Feet-FORMERSEWER PONDSNATURALTREATMENT
SYSTEM901 COLLEGE
VIEWDRIVE & 500 DAVIS RIDGE ROAD Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-04-07-20 (4.11(c)--Termination of the California Natural Resources Agency's Urban Flood Protection Grant)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Bid Negotiation No. 5466, (Job No. 2686) Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project:
(1) Award to Crosspoint General Engineering, in the amount of $632,937; (2) Approve $79,000 for construction contract administration and inspection costs; (3) Approve $134,500 for project development costs;
(4) Approve $63,000 to provide construction contingency funding; (5) Authorize the City Manager to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amount up to a total of $15,000; and (6) Find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301 - Existing Facilities, Section 15302 – Replacement or Reconstruction, and Section 15303 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures.

Fiscal Impact
The Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project (Project) is being funded by a state-only grant from the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) in the amount of $840,609. This grant requires a 10 percent match and the additional $84,610 funds were programmed from Public Works’ Streets budget for a total of $925,219.

Cost Summary
Item Estimated
Project Development Costs $134,500
Construction Contract + Contingency $695,937
Contract Administration, Inspection, Testing $79,000
Additional City Manager Authority $15,000
Total Project Costs $924,437
Project Budget $925,219
MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Bid Negotiation No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 358
Report to Redding City Council October 8, 2024
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Page 2 Project cost components are estimates and some shifting of the project development, construction management, and construction contingency funds may be necessary to balance the project within the approved budget.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the bid for the project and provide staff with an alternative direction. Without this project, necessary safety improvements will not be completed. In addition, if this project is not awarded, the City of Redding (City) is at risk of losing $840,609 in grant funding and potential impact on applications for future HSIP grants.

Background/Analysis
The project will add intersection lighting for nighttime safety at 18 locations across the City. On November 16, 2021, the Council accepted and appropriated HSIP grant funds in the amount of $840,609 for costs related to the project.

Attached is a tabulation of project bids received and opened on September 12, 2024. The low bid in the amount of $632,937 was received from Crosspoint General Engineering, of Redding, California. The engineer's estimate was $561,753. Total project development costs for this project are estimated to be $134,500. Project development costs include engineering, surveying, right-of-way, environmental, and consultant services.

The Intersection Safety Lighting Project includes the installation of new overhead street lighting where none exists at 18 un-signalized intersections throughout the City. Installation includes install of electrical raceways, overhead street lights, trenching, excavation, aggregate base backfill, concrete forming and curing, disposal of excess materials, and trimming of existing trees that will block lighting.

Environmental Review
Staff has reviewed the project and determined that it is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301-Existing Facilities, Section 15302–Replacement or Reconstruction, and Section 15303–New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing facilities, structures, or equipment involving negligible or no expansion of use. Class 2 exemptions consists of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. Class 3 exemptions consist of construction and location of limited numbers of new small facilities and equipment, or conversion of existing structures. The project involves the installation of limited numbers of new street lights, as well as the reconstruction or conversion of existing facilities and equipment. The project will be constructed within the existing right-of-way and will result in negligible expansion of use. The project area has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Packet Pg. 359
Report to Redding City Council October 8, 2024
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project Page 3 Attachments
^Bid Tabulation
^Location Map
^Notice of Exemption
Previous Staff Report 11-16-21
Packet Pg. 360
BID TABULATION FOR:

Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project
Bid Schedule No.: 5466

ENGINEER'S EST
9/12/2024 UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT

ITEMDESCRIPTION UNIT QTY PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL 1 Traffic Control LS 1 $38,000.00 $38,000.00 $27,000.00 $27,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $90,000.00 $90,000.00 2 Water Pollution Control LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 $1,439.25 $1,439.25 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 3 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 $4,500.00 $4,500.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 4 Conduit (2" PVC) LF 3378 $50.00 $168,900.00 $40.00 $135,120.00 $65.00 $219,570.00 $60.00 $202,680.00 5 Conduit (4" PVC) LF 79 $70.38 $5,560.18 $110.00 $8,690.00 $155.00 $12,245.00 $100.00 $7,900.00 6 Conductor (#6) LF 5869 $4.47 $26,257.91 $7.13 $41,845.97 $2.25 $13,205.25 $3.00 $17,607.00 7 Conductor (2-#1/0 & 1-#2) LF 2453 $19.14 $46,950.42 $7.25 $17,784.25 $6.50 $15,944.50 $6.00 $14,718.00 8 Conductor (2-#4/0 & 1-#2/0) LF 189 $21.93 $4,144.39 $13.00 $2,457.00 $20.00 $3,780.00 $6.00 $1,134.00 9 Conductor (2-#350 & 1-#4/0) LF 911 $19.14 $17,436.54 $40.00 $36,440.00 $15.00 $13,665.00 $6.00 $5,466.00 10 Conductor (2-#500 & 1-#350) LF 365 $21.93 $8,003.72 $40.00 $14,600.00 $40.00 $14,600.00 $10.00 $3,650.00 11 Splice Box (Pullbox) - (2E) EA 30 $1,200.00 $36,000.00 $1,200.00 $36,000.00 $1,775.00 $53,250.00 $1,200.00 $36,000.00 12 Splice Box (Pullbox) - (3E) EA 7 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 $1,500.00 $10,500.00 $2,500.00 $17,500.00 $2,000.00 $14,000.00 13 Street Light (25' Std & LED
Luminaire) - S3/S10 EA 14 $5,000.00 $70,000.00 $7,500.00 $105,000.00 $7,500.00 $105,000.00 $9,000.00 $126,000.00 14 Street Light (35' Std & LED
Luminaire) - L2/L5 EA 17 $5,500.00 $93,500.00 $9,500.00 $161,500.00 $8,500.00 $144,500.00 $10,500.00 $178,500.00 15 Street Light, Decorative (25' Std &
LED Luminaire) EA 3 $5,500.00 $16,500.00 $10,000.00 $30,000.00 $15,100.00 $45,300.00 $17,000.00 $51,000.00 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS $561,753.16 $632,937.22 $729,999.00 $758,655.00 Crosspoint General
Engineering SnL Group, Inc
Robert J. Frank
Construction, Inc

Page 1 of 2 ends

BID TABULATION FOR:

Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project
Bid Schedule No.: 5466
9/12/2024
ITEMDESCRIPTION UNIT QTY 1 Traffic Control LS 1 2 Water Pollution Control LS 1 3 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 4 Conduit (2" PVC) LF 3378 5 Conduit (4" PVC) LF 79 6 Conductor (#6) LF 5869 7 Conductor (2-#1/0 & 1-#2) LF 2453 8 Conductor (2-#4/0 & 1-#2/0) LF 189 9 Conductor (2-#350 & 1-#4/0) LF 911 10 Conductor (2-#500 & 1-#350) LF 365
11 Splice Box (Pullbox) - (2E) EA 30
12 Splice Box (Pullbox) - (3E) EA7
13 Street Light (25' Std & LED
Luminaire) - S3/S10 EA 14
14 Street Light (35' Std & LED
Luminaire) - L2/L5 EA 17
15 Street Light, Decorative (25' Std &
LED Luminaire) EA
3 TOTAL - CONTRACT ITEMS
Averages
UNIT
PRICE
$54,000.00
$1,813.08
$12,333.33
$55.00
$121.67
$4.13
$6.58
$13.00
$20.33
$30.00
$1,391.67
$2,000.00
$8,000.00
$9,500.00
$14,033.33
Average Bid
$707,197.07

Page 2 of 2 ends

HARTNELL AVE

CITY OF REDDING

SYSTEMIC INTERSECTION

SAFETY LIGHTING PROJECT

PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

VICINITY MAP

LOCATION

PROJECT

LOCATION MAP
I-5
#1
#4
#15
#11
#5
#2
#6
#18
#1 - BELTLINE RD & MOUNTAIN LAKES BLVD

PROJECT LOCATIONS
#4 - HILLTOP DR & INDUSTRIAL ST
#15 - SHASTA VIEW DR & CHRISTIAN AVE
#11 - RANCHO RD & GOODWATER AVE
#5 - LAKE BLVD & KESWICK DAM RD
#6 - LAKE BLVD & MAGNUMS WY
#18 - SHASTA VIEW DR & WILSON AVE
#12 - RANCHO RD & PERSISTENCE LN
#7 - LAKE BLVD & WILMINGTON WY
#17 - SHASTA VIEW DR & HAWN AVE
#9 - RANCHO RD & ALTA MESA DR
#13 - RANCHO RD & SARATOGA DR
#16 - SHASTA VIEW DR & GALAXY WY
#12
#7
#10 #9
#17
#16
OLD REGON TRL SR 44
SR 299 HILLTOP DR

CYPRESS AVE
SR 299

BUENAVENTURA BLVD

RANCHO RD AIRPORT RD

MARKET ST

LAKE BLVD
#3
#2 - BUENAVENTURA BLVD & LAKESIDE DR
#3 - CHURN CREEK RD & HARPOLE RD
LOCATION MAP 1
#8 - RANCHO RD & ALTA CAMINO DR
#10 - RANCHO RD & ALTA RICO DR
#14 - SHASTA VIEW DR & ALDEN AVE
#8 #13
#14
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project)

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
To: D Office of Planning and Research
1400 Tenth Street, Room 121
Sacramento, CA 95814
[8J Shasta County Clerk
County of Shasta
P.O. Box 990880, 1643 Market Street
Redding, CA 96099-0880
Project Title: Systematic Intersection Safety Lighting Project FROM: City of Redding
Public Works Department
777 Cypress A venue
Redding, CA 96001
Project Location - Specific: Various intersections along Lake Boulevard, Shasta View Drive, Rancho Road, Mountain Lakes Boulevard, Buenaventura Boulevard, Hilltop Drive, and Churn Creek Road.

Project Location - City: Redding Project Location - County: =S=h=as=t=a _________ _ Description of Project: The City of Redding will implement a lighting improvement project at 18 intersections in Redding.

The project will install approximately 3 7 new street lights, 3 decorative street lights, and retrofit 2 existing street lights.

Conduit, conductors, pull boxes, and associated electrical equipment will also be installed. Work will involve minor vegetation removal, trenching, excavation, concrete installation, paving, and striping. All work will be conducted within City right of way, and the public will be notified of the construction activity.

Name of Public Agency Approving Project: _C_ity~o_f_R_e_d_d_in~g ____________________ _ Name of Person or Agency Carrying Out Project: ~T~re_v~o~r_B_r~o~o~k~s,~P~r-=o..,_je~c~t~E=n=g~in~e~e~r ____________ _ Exempt Status: (check one)
D Ministerial [Section 21080(b )( 1 ); 15268]
D Declared Emergency [Section 21080(b)(3); 15269(a)]
D Emergency Project [Section 21080(b)(4); 15269(b)]
D Statutory Exemptions. State code number: Section 15262, Feasibility and Planning Studies D Common Sense Exemption (This project does not fall within an exempt class, but it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity may have a significant effect on the environment (14 CCR 15061 [b][3]). 00 Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: Sec. 15301. Existing Facilities, 15302 Replacement or Reconstruction, and 15303 New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. [8J No exceptions apply that would bar the use of a categorical exemption (PRO 21084 and 14 CCR 15300.2).

Reasons why project is exempt: Class 1 exemptions include the operation, repair, maintenance, or minor alteration of existing facilities, structures, or equipment involving negligible or no expansion of use. Class 2 exemptions consists of replacement or reconstruction where the new structure will be located on the same site and will have substantially the same purpose and capacity. Class 3 exemptions consist of construction and location of limited numbers of new small facilities and equipment, or conversion of existing structures. The project involves the installation of limited numbers of new street lights, as well as the reconstruction or conversion of existing facilities and equipment. The project will be constructed within the existing right of way and will result in negligible expansion of use. The project area has been reviewed for sensitive resources such as threatened or endangered species or their habitats, sensitive vegetation communities, tribal lands, or tribal cultural resources. The project has no potential to have a significant effect on the environment.

Lead Agency Contact Person: "-'A=m=b"-'e=r-=K=e=l=le""'y'---------- lf Filed by Applicant:

1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.

Telephone: 530.225.4046

2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? o Yes o No [8J Signed by Lead Agency
D Signed by Applicant
Date received for filing at OPR: _____ _
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: ^Notice of Exemption (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 365
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 366
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 367
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 368
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 369
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 370
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 371
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 372
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 373
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 374
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 375
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 376
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 377
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 378
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 379
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 380
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 381
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 382
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 383
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 384
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 385
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 386
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project) Packet Pg. 387
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 11-16-21 (4.11(d)--Award Bid No. 5466, Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept update regarding the Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project and, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four-fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.

Fiscal Impact
The Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project (Project) costs will be funded by Public Works’ Wastewater, Water, and Streets Divisions. The updated, estimated total project cost of the repairs is $3,405,000.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the project status report and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On May 7, 2024, Council adopted an emergency resolution for the project and authorized the negotiation of an emergency public works contract. Cox & Cox Construction (Contractor) completed all underground repairs at all locations by August 30, 2024 and also completed repaving of Placer Street on September 9, 2024. Additionally, the contractor has continued to complete the remaining items for the project and completed restriping of Placer Street on September 27, 2024 and is anticipating completing the raising of manhole and valve lids along Placer Street by October 11, 2024. The remaining work to be performed includes, restriping of various locations around Placer Street, Court Street and Tehama Street which has been tentatively scheduled for completion by October 25, 2024. All remaining items of work are anticipated to be completed by the end of October 2024, with final project closeout before the end of the calendar year.

MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Update Regarding Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 388
Report to Redding City Council October 7, 2024
Re: 4.11(e)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Page 2
The below table provides further details of the contractor’s progress based on the number of locations that need to be addressed and estimated costs. Staff has not received all costs billed through September 2024 from the contractor, but we estimate the total costs to date at $2,100,000. Staff will continue to update Council as the project progresses.

Original
Locations
Additional
Locations
Total
Locations
Completed
Locations
Costs to Date
(Estimated)
96 0 96 82 $2,100,000
The project proposes to replace substandard sewer pipe, associated infrastructure, failing asphalt concrete and other miscellaneous public health and safety work, on Placer Street and within the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvement Phase I project limits.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no further action is required. On May 7, 2024, the Council determined that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the CEQA Guidelines, per Section 15269(b)-Emergency Projects.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to the Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project (Project):
(1) Adopt Resolution, by not less than four-fifths affirmative vote, authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and award an emergency public works contract for the Project in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000;
(3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve construction contingency amounts up to a total of $300,000;
(4) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve construction management and inspection amounts up to a total of $175,000; and
(5) Find that the Project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects.

Fiscal Impact
The estimated Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project (Project) total cost is $2,475,000. These costs include construction, construction contingency and staff time for construction management and inspections. The project will be funded with remaining Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements Phase 1 funds. Including withheld retention, liquidated damages and uncompleted work items which is approximately $2,160,000. Supplemental funding of $315,000 will come from the Wastewater, Water and Streets Division’s Fiscal Year 2023-24 budgets which have sufficient funds appropriated.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.11(f)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.11(f)--Emergency Construction Contract to Repair and Replace Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(e)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Report to Redding City Council May 2, 2024
Re: 9.11(f)--Emergency Repair and Replace Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Pavement on Placer St. Page 2
Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose to not authorize the award of an emergency contract, and instead have staff prepare plans and specifications to award a contract to the low bidder in accordance with state and local contracting procedures. Or, Council could provide alterative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
On April 1, 2024, Council voted to enter into a Contract Amendment, Settlement Agreement and Release with the contractor for the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements Phase 1 project. This settlement agreement was partially due to the contractor’s refusal to make required repairs to substandard work done on the project. This substandard work has the potential to create public health and safety issues.

Staff has considered repackaging the project plans and specifications for bidding; however, this process would likely require a minimum of six months in order to obtain an executed contract and ultimately provide a contractor with a notice to proceed. This timeline is unacceptable given the condition of the installed sewer infrastructure and would jeopardize being able to complete all the repair work, including re-paving Placer Street, prior to the onset of winter. In addition, current Magnolia Area Sewer Improvement Phase 1 project site conditions present potential impacts to public health, property and safety. Therefore, staff proposes an emergency contract to replace the substandard sewer pipe and associated infrastructure, failing asphalt concrete and minor associated public health and safety work on Placer Street and within Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements Phase 1 project limits. Staff estimates the work will be complete within four months of commencement of construction activities.

It is noted that the Public Contract Code (PCC) (Section 20168) provides that the local government’s legislative body may pass a resolution by a four-fifths vote of its members declaring that the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health and property. Further, the PCC (Section 22050) provides that “in case of emergency, a public agency, pursuant to a four-fifths vote of its governing body, may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts.”
It is in the public’s interest and necessity to repair the sewer system, pave Placer Street and repair or replace other associated minor items of work immediately to ensure protection of the public’s health, safety and personal property occurs.

The Resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects. Section 15269(b) includes emergency repairs to publicly and privately-owned service facilities necessary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. The emergency repair and replacement will occur in areas of previous disturbance, and the repairs are necessary to maintain service essential to public health.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(e)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Report to Redding City Council May 2, 2024
Re: 9.11(f)--Emergency Repair and Replace Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Pavement on Placer St. Page 3
Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
^Notice of Exemption

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(e)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING TO

AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO AWARD AN EMERGENCY
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO REPAIR AND REPLACE SUBSTANDARD SEWER PIPE AND FAILING ASHPHALT CONCRETE

PAVEMENT ON PLACER STREET
WHEREAS, Public Contract Code section 22050 and Redding Municipal Code 4.22.120(A) provide that, in the case of emergency, a public agency may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts; and WHEREAS, on April 1, 2024, Council voted unanimously to enter into a Contract Amendment, Settlement Agreement and Release regarding the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements – Phase I project; and WHEREAS, portions of the underground sewer improvements constructed as part of the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements – Phase I project were not constructed in accordance with the contract documents; and
WHEREAS, proper sewer infrastructure is critical to public health; and WHEREAS, if not repaired immediately, the improperly installed sewer infrastructure has a high potential for failure during high-flow periods, winter, potentially ultimately causing significant disruptions in service, failures and damage to associated public and adjacent private infrastructure; and WHEREAS, Placer Street is a primary arterial with moderate traffic volumes and the asphalt concrete pavement is in a failing condition as a result of longitudinal and transverse sewer trench pavement patches within the roadway section presenting a public safety concern; and WHEREAS, a competitive solicitation for bids is anticipated to require six (6) months and would further delay the needed repairs to prevent sewer blockages, sink holes and further damage to the public and private infrastructure until 2025; and
WHEREAS, continued pavement failure and blockage of the sewer conveyance system would threaten the safety and property of roadway users and persons nearby; and WHEREAS, isolation of the impacted area so that the delay due to competitive bidding could be accommodated would not mitigate or eliminate the threat to persons and property; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The City Council of the City of Redding finds that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings of fact.

2. The public interest and necessity require the immediate expenditure of public money to restore the sewer conveyance system to full capacity, protect the public health, safety and welfare, and prevent further damage to the roadway.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(e)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing

3. The City Council of the City of Redding therefore authorizes the City Manager to award an emergency construction contract to repair the sewer system and roadway along Placer Street.

4. The action authorized herein shall be reviewed by the City Council at all regular meetings of the Council until such time as the City Council determines that the emergency is abated.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
____________________________________
TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
_________________________________ _____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(e)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing CITY OF REDDING LOCATION MAP MAGNOLIA AREA SEWER IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE 1 EMERGENCY REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT LOCATION PROJECT ORIGINAL REPAIR AREA EMERGENCY APPROVED Packet Pg. 395
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(e)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing APPROVED Packet Pg. 396
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(e)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution, effective October 13, 2024, amending the title of the City of Redding Salary Schedule for Non-Exempt Unrepresented Employees.

Fiscal Impact
As no salary increases or changes to salary are associated with this action, there is no fiscal impact associated with this action.

Alternative Action
The City Council could elect not to approve the resolution amending the salary schedule title and provide staff alternate direction.

Background/Analysis
The proposed action would rename the salary schedule which is used for unrepresented nonexempt employees to remove the reference to “part-time” status. The “part-time” language in the document title limits the City of Redding’s departments ability to fill any of the unrepresented hourly positions with anything other than part-time employment. Amending the title will provide consistency with the Redding Independent Employees’ Organization Salary Schedule for NonExempt employees while removing limitations preventing the unrepresented hourly positions from being filled as a regular full-time position.

Staff will continue to designate status (full time, part-time, temporary, seasonal, etc.) when requesting to add new positions or fill existing vacancies using the status codes listed in various Memoranda of Understanding and the Employment and Benefit Policies for Unrepresented Employees.

MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.15(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.15(a)--Resolution Amending the title of the Salary Schedule for Non-Exempt Unrepresented Employees
Kari Kibler, Personnel
Director
Packet Pg. 397
Report to Redding City Council October 7, 2024
Re: 4.15(a)--Reso Renaming Unrep Salary Scheduled for Hourly Employees Page 2 Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Resolution
^Unrepresented Non-Exempt Employee Schedule of Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates – Final
Unrepresented Non-Exempt Employee Schedule of Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates – Redline
Packet Pg. 398
RESOLUTION N0. 2024-__________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

RENAMING THE SCHEDULE OF PART-TIME EMPLOYEE

CLASSIFICATIONS AND WAGE RATES/RANGES FOR UNREPRESENTED

EMPLOYEES TO THE NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SCHEDULE OF

CLASSIFICATIONS AND HOURLY WAGE RATES
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the City of Redding Schedule of Part-Time Employee Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates/Ranges be renamed to the Non-Exempt Employee Schedule of Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates, effective October 13, 2024, as attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the City Council deems it to the in the best interest of the City to adopt such recommendation.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED by the City Council that the City of Redding Schedule of Part-Time Employee Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates/Ranges is renamed to the Non-Exempt Employee Schedule of Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates, effective October 13, 2024.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 15
th day of October, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
________________________________
TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
___________________________ _________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.15(a)--Reso Renaming Unrep Salary Scheduled for Hourly Employees) J/C Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 401 Recreation Leader $16.00 $16.80 $17.64 $18.52
421 On-Call/Seasonal Firefighter $16.00 $16.80 $17.64 $18.52 $0.00 $0.00 $20.42 426 Police Cadet $16.00 $16.80 $17.64 $18.52 $0.00 $0.00 $20.42 411 Recreation Specialist $16.80 $17.64 $18.52 $19.45
431 Recreation Instructor I $17.38 $18.25 $19.16 $20.12 $21.13 $22.18 $23.29 $24.46 416 Recreation Crew Leader $17.64 $18.52 $19.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $22.512 432 Recreation Crew Supervisor $18.26 $19.17 $20.13 $21.14 $22.20 $23.30 $24.47 $25.69 433 Recreation Instructor II $18.26 $19.17 $20.13 $21.14 $22.20 $23.30 $24.47 $25.69 441 Recreation Coordinator I $19.17 $20.13 $21.14 $22.20 $23.30 $24.47 $25.69 $26.98 446 Recreation Coordinator II $20.12 $21.13 $22.18 $23.29 $24.46 $25.68 $26.96 $28.31 475 Red Light Enforcement Specialist $28.37 $29.79 $31.28 $32.84 $34.48 Pay rates are calculated utilizing a standardized formula to apply a difference of 5% between steps and small differences may occur due to rounding.

CITY OF REDDING

NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SCHEDULE OF CLASSIFICATIONS AND HOURLY WAGE RATES Effective December 24, 2023
Hourly Wage Rate – Salary Step
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: ^Unrepresented Non-Exempt Employee Schedule of Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates – 5%
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: ^Unrepresented Non-Exempt Employee Schedule of Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates – J/C Classification 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 401 Recreation Leader $16.00 $16.80 $17.64 $18.52
421 On-Call/Seasonal Firefighter $16.00 $16.80 $17.64 $18.52 $0.00 $0.00 $20.42 426 Police Cadet $16.00 $16.80 $17.64 $18.52 $0.00 $0.00 $20.42 411 Recreation Specialist $16.80 $17.64 $18.52 $19.45
431 Recreation Instructor I $17.38 $18.25 $19.16 $20.12 $21.13 $22.18 $23.29 $24.46 416 Recreation Crew Leader $17.64 $18.52 $19.45 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $22.512 432 Recreation Crew Supervisor $18.26 $19.17 $20.13 $21.14 $22.20 $23.30 $24.47 $25.69 433 Recreation Instructor II $18.26 $19.17 $20.13 $21.14 $22.20 $23.30 $24.47 $25.69 441 Recreation Coordinator I $19.17 $20.13 $21.14 $22.20 $23.30 $24.47 $25.69 $26.98 446 Recreation Coordinator II $20.12 $21.13 $22.18 $23.29 $24.46 $25.68 $26.96 $28.31 475 Red Light Enforcement Specialist $28.37 $29.79 $31.28 $32.84 $34.48 Pay rates are calculated utilizing a standardized formula to apply a difference of 5% between steps and small differences may occur due to rounding.

CITY OF REDDING

NON-EXEMPT EMPLOYEE SCHEDULE OF PART TIME EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATIONS AND HOURLY WAGE

RATES/RANGES
Effective December 24, 2023
Hourly Wage Rate – Salary Step
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Unrepresented Non-Exempt Employee Schedule of Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates – 5%
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Unrepresented Non-Exempt Employee Schedule of Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates –

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept report recognizing City of Redding employees who have achieved or will achieve 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 years of service with the City of Redding as of December 31, 2024.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with the approval of this report.

Alternative Action
City Council (Council) could choose to not accept the report recognizing City of Redding (City) employees who have achieved service milestones.

Background/Analysis
To recognize employees for their dedication and service to the City and the community, annually, at the mid-October Council Meeting, the City recognizes employees who have achieved or will achieve service milestones.

Recognizing employees for their service and commitment to the City, as well as the community they serve, is extremely important. City employees are essential to this organization and the services we provide to the community. Without dedicated staff, we would be unable to serve our community efficiently and effectively.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.15(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.15(b)--Employee Service Award Presentation
Kari Kibler, Personnel
Director
Packet Pg. 404
Report to Redding City Council October 4, 2024
Re: 4.15(b)--Employee Service Award Presentation Page 2 City Manager Goals/Objectives
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Internal Memo for Service Award Recognition 2024_Final Packet Pg. 405
DATE: September 19, 2024
TO: Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
FROM: Kari Kibler, Personnel Director
SUBJECT: Employee Service Award Presentation, City Council Meeting – October 15, 2024 The City of Redding would like to recognize the following employees who have achieved or will achieve 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, or 30 years of service with the City of Redding as of December 31, 2024. These employees will be presented a service award by their Department Directors within their respective Departments. 5 year employees
David Antonowich Michael Enyart Nicholas Kurland Edward Sherman Jordan Avery Brenna Fish Jaeryd Loader Mary Simonsen
Kimberly Boney Kyle Freeze Kyle Lovelady Myles Simpson
Nicholas Brewer Shawna Fuller Laura Macsween Daniel Stewart Chase Brown Michael Garner Jr Kelley Martinez Jay Sumerlin Monique Brunet Tristan Granberry Terren Mattioli Kristal Talaski Skyler Carlson Brandon Griffin Benjamin Omey Byron Upshaw Kortney Christle Jeffrey Hansen Julienne Parker Dillon Usrey Clifford Concello Adam Harvey Mitchell Paschen Dustin Vega Nicholas Covey Wyatt Hopwood Kiley Piercy Anthony Villarreal Mar Dahl Darrell Hunter Christopher Prokupek Cheryl Wetzel Scott Davis Brandon Jackson Kimberly Raudman Mitchell Wilcox George Destepheno Jr Rachel Johnson Kristen Reagan Camile Woodstrom Steven DiPaolo Scott Kindy Jarret Robertson Joseph Zalesny David Duke Christopher Knight Timothy Robrecht Jordan Zeppieri Matthew Emry Kody Kraft Chase Rulofson
10 year employees
Robert Bodner Darren Hull Cary Moore Daniel Shaw
Kelly Campbell Charles Iwamura Regan Ortega Jeffrey Smith Kamryn Candelaria-Hut Kyle Jones Michael Prather Kirk Stone Michael Deedon Devin Ketel Nicole Rempfer Amy Thompson
Aaron Dieck Josef Link Beau Roberts Matthew Thompson
John Dobson David Linson Gregory Robinett Zachary Torgerson Joseph Dungan Samuel Marvin Jamie Rouland Heather Wilson Grayson Hartman Jodi McMurtrey Thomas Semb Elizabeth Witts Jerid Heyne
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: ^Internal Memo for Service Award Recognition 2024_Final (4.15(b)--Employee Service Award Presentation) 15 year employees
David Campbell Christopher Holdren Christopher Schertz Kenneth Straws Jaime Halter Ted Miller Norman Schneider Conrad Tona
20 year employees
Joseph Adkins Bernard Fargen Craig Meier Barry Tippin
Anette Cates Jason Foley Jennifer Moore Corri Vandiver
Garrett Claycamp Scott Hansen Jason Rhoads Michael Watson Sandy Cravens Mark Johnson Randy Sandifer Corey Welch
Robert Crawford
25 year employees
Scott Campbell Patrick Keener Adam Snyder Steven Tompkins Michael Conner Robert Packard
30 year employees
Shawn Avery Naomi Harri Paul Ostendorf Lonnie Schreiber Michele Davis Lori Lackey James Rich Chris Smith
Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: ^Internal Memo for Service Award Recognition 2024_Final (4.15(b)--Employee Service Award Presentation)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt a City of Redding Personnel Policy - Payroll Time Cards Policy providing guidance and procedures for accurate reporting of work time, absences, and payroll, using the Oracle Time and Absences module as the City-approved web-based payroll system.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact for approving the proposed Payroll Time Cards Policy (Policy).

Alternative Action
The City Council could decline to approve the proposed policy or provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The City of Redding is mandated to compensate employees for the time worked in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), applicable state law, the Redding Municipal Code and as defined in the Memoranda of Understandings and Employment and Benefit Policies for the Unrepresented Employees, as applicable. Therefore, all City employees have a duty to comply with guidelines and procedures with respect to accurately recording and reporting of work time, attendance, and payroll.

In 2006, the City Council adopted a Payroll Timesheets Policy, which provided guidance to staff for the accurate recording and reporting of work time, attendance and payroll. However, the Payroll Timesheets Policy is now obsolete with the transition to the Oracle Time and Absences module, which went live on October 13, 2024.

MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.15(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.15(c)--Approval of new Payroll Time Cards Policy Kari Kibler, Personnel
Director
Packet Pg. 408
Report to Redding City Council October 8, 2024
Re: 4.15(c)--Approval of new Payroll Time Cards Policy Page 2 The proposed policy provides guidance and procedures for accurate reporting of work time, absences, and payroll using the Oracle Time and Absences module and will replace the obsolete Payroll Timesheets Policy.

The proposed policy has been shared with all City of Redding Bargaining Units and no concerns were identified.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^New Payroll Time Cards Policy
^Current Payroll Timesheets Policy (2014)
Packet Pg. 409

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

PAYROLL TIME CARDS POLICY

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
TBD 1
Personnel Director ____________________________ City Manager ________________________________ Purpose
The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance and procedures for accurate reporting of work time, absences, and payroll.

Policy
It is the policy of the City of Redding (City) to compensate employees for the time worked in accordance with the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), applicable state law, the Redding Municipal Code, and as defined in the Memoranda of Understandings and Employment and Benefit Policies for the Unrepresented Employees, as applicable. Therefore, all City employees have a duty to comply with the guidelines and procedures with respect to recording and reporting of work time, attendance, and payroll.

Employee work time and attendance is entered and recorded in the Oracle Time and Absence Management module, which collects actual time entered through various mechanisms (e.g. desktop computer, mobile device, etc.). Some operational departments, such as Police and Fire, may utilize separate scheduling systems for recording time and absence.

Definitions
Time Card: A record which tracks employee hours worked and absences for payroll and billing purposes, formally referred to as “timesheets” in City policies and procedures.

Electronic Time Card: A fully digital time card accessed via the internet, in the City’s case, within the Oracle system.

General Procedures and Responsibilities
Pay periods run for two weeks, beginning on a Sunday and ending on a Saturday. Employees are paid on the Thursday after 12:00 noon following the last Saturday of the pay period. If employees are scheduled to be paid on a day that lands on a City-observed fixed holiday, employees will be paid on the preceding workday. Payroll information is available through the City’s web-based payroll system.

Accurate and timely reporting of employee time and attendance is the responsibility of the employee and the employee’s supervisor/manager. Supervisors/managers are responsible for ensuring that work and leave time are reported accurately and reflect each employee’s activities for the pay period and for validating this by approving the employee’s time card timely.

Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: ^New Payroll Time Cards Policy (4.15(c)--Approval of new Payroll Time Cards Policy)

TY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

PAYROLL TIME CARDS POLICY

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
TBD 2
The department director or designee is responsible for ensuring existing and new employees are trained on the time card program and reinforcing the need for it to be password protected at all times since it provides access to their personal information.

Electronic Time Cards
A. Completion of Electronic Time Cards
The Oracle Time and Absences module is the City-approved web-based payroll system. All employees must complete an electronic time card showing actual hours worked as well as leave types (e.g. sick leave, vacation time off, compensatory time off, holiday, administrative leave, etc.) used during each payroll period for which they are to be paid. Employees will need to record the hours to the appropriate job(s) and/or account(s), and document the activities performed as applicable.

With the approval of the Finance Director or designee, under rare and extraordinary circumstances, an employee may submit a signed, paper time card for manual time entry into Oracle by their supervisor or designee. Employees on an approved leave of absence will not need Finance Director approval to submit a paper time card. The manager, supervisor or designee in these instances will enter the time from a paper time card which has been completed and signed by the employee. If the employee is on leave of absence and not able to sign the completed paper time card, upon return from leave, the supervisor will ensure the employee has reviewed and signed as to the accuracy and completeness of the employee's time card.

B. Submission of Completed Time Cards
Each employee is responsible for the accurate completion and submission of his/her electronic time card in a timely manner (i.e. each employee is responsible to electronically submit his/her time card at the end of his/her last shift during the pay period); this submission is the employee’s “signature” signifying time card approval. For situations where an employee is unavailable to submit his/her time card, the supervisor or designee will need to submit his/her time card on the employee’s behalf through Oracle.

The manager for payroll purposes (i.e., the designated employee who is set up to review and approve time cards for accuracy and completeness per their department’s timetable) is responsible for ensuring that all employees who worked during the pay period have completed an electronic time card and approving the time cards. The manager’s “Approve” on the approval message serves as his/her electronic signature for the approval.

Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: ^New Payroll Time Cards Policy (4.15(c)--Approval of new Payroll Time Cards Policy)

TY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

PAYROLL TIME CARDS POLICY

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
TBD 3
Falsification of a time card by any employee, supervisor, manager, or department director shall subject such employee to discipline as outlined in the City’s Discipline Policy.

C. Payroll Changes
Any inaccurate data or late time card information will be corrected through the submission of a Payroll Change Request.

Time for one pay period may not be entered with another pay period to correct a previous error; a Payroll Change Request must be submitted. Payroll Change Requests shall be processed the pay period immediately following submission provided the information is received no later than 5:00 p.m. on the Monday prior to payday.

D. Timelines
Departments are responsible for setting internal deadlines for employee and manager approval of electronic time cards, and are completed by the deadline to submit approved time cards for payroll processing.

The deadline for manager approval of completed time cards is 5:00 p.m. on the Monday prior to payday. Timelines will be adjusted whenever a holiday occurs on the Monday prior to payday.

The Finance Division will provide advance notice and guidelines, via email, to all departments in such situations.

Internal Controls
The Personnel Department is responsible for determining/interpreting appropriate rates of pay and other terms of employment, per applicable City policies and labor agreements.

Access to the payroll processing program will be strictly limited to those with direct need to the program, in accordance with the City’s internal control procedures.

There shall always be at least two people involved in the processing of payroll, for verification and compliance purposes.

Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: ^New Payroll Time Cards Policy (4.15(c)--Approval of new Payroll Time Cards Policy) Packet Pg. 413
Attachment: ^Current Payroll Timesheets Policy (2014) (4.15(c)--Approval of new Payroll Time Cards Policy) Packet Pg. 414
Attachment: ^Current Payroll Timesheets Policy (2014) (4.15(c)--Approval of new Payroll Time Cards Policy)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Conduct a Public Hearing and, upon conclusion, adopt Resolution approving the City of Redding’s Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2023−24 to 2028−29.

Fiscal Impact
The City of Redding’s (City) Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is not binding, nor is it a formal budget document; therefore, it, alone, does not have direct budget implications. However, the CIP functions as a major reference tool to help in future budgeting decisions.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to adopt the CIP as proposed and provide alternative direction to staff. This will render the City out of compliance with the California Government Code and may impact the collection and use of certain funds designated for capital improvement projects.

Background/Analysis
Attached for public review and consideration by the Council is the draft CIP for Fiscal Years (FY) 2023-24 to 2028-29. The CIP is a multi-year schedule of public improvements planned by various City departments. It provides a general prioritization of capital improvements so that the City and the public will be able to determine with greater certainty when projects might move to construction subject to sufficient revenue collection. The draft CIP is representative of the City’s capital improvement needs based on the existing budget, the General Plan, and the individual department master plans. The CIP has several general benefits and functions that include:

MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 6.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.1--Public Hearing to consider Resolution approving the City of Redding's Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2023-24 to 2028-29.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 415
Report to Redding City Council October 8, 2024
Re: 6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan Page 2 • Providing a comprehensive look at the City’s projected capital and infrastructure plan; • Assisting in forecasting workload and aiding in project coordination between departments (e.g., avoids paving a street one year and tearing it up the next year for a waterline);
• Assisting in scheduling improvements that require more than one year to construct; • Helping with long-term financial planning;
• Providing a tool for setting priorities and obtaining citizen participation in determining those priorities;
• Being an essential component in meeting the state legal requirements for public accounting of development impact fee funds; and
• Helping to ensure that plans for community facilities are carried out.

On April 9, 2024, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft CIP and acted by adopting a finding of consistency with the General Plan pursuant to Sections 65103(c) and 65401 of the Government Code.

The main term for the draft CIP is for FY 2023−24 to FY 2028−29. This includes the current budget year and the five subsequent years. Additional projects are also identified that are either currently unfunded or are scheduled beyond the FY 2028−29. These additional projects must be funded when needed to provide for anticipated growth based on the City’s General Plan.

The CIP contains projects from the following departments/divisions: Airports, Community Services, Redding Electric Utility, Redding Fire Department, Solid Waste, Storm Drain Utility, Streets, Wastewater Utility, and Water Utility. Combined, the main term of the CIP contains 173 projects, totaling over $747 million. The CIP includes a discussion of current facilities and services, a statement of consistency with the General Plan, and a list of projects with basic descriptions and anticipated funding sources.

The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. As projects advance to the design phase, from the approved CIP, environmental review will be conducted to ensure compliance with CEQA.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality and quantity of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Resolution
Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft
Packet Pg. 416
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-___

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

ADOPTING THE REDDING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR
2023-24 to 2028-29
WHEREAS, a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) has been prepared which identifies the City of Redding’s long-term capital improvement project needs in a comprehensive and consistent format; and
WHEREAS, the CIP was prepared in a format and with content that is consistent with the requirements of Government Code section 66002, which establishes requirements for the preparation of a CIP that includes projects subject to development impact fees; and WHEREAS, the CIP was reviewed by the Redding Planning Commission on April 9, 2024, and was approved as consistent with the General Plan pursuant to Government Code section 65103(c); and
WHEREAS, on August 20, 2024, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to allow opportunity for public comment on the draft CIP; and
WHEREAS, having satisfied the requirements of law governing preparation, content, general plan consistency, and opportunity for public review, the City Council wishes to adopt said CIP to formalize the document so it can become available for consideration in budgeting, land use planning, and accounting, among other benefits;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding does hereby approve and adopt the Redding Capital Improvement Plan for 2023-24 to 2028-29 included herewith as Attachment "A."
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 1st day of October, 2024, and was adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
___
SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: ^Resolution (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CITY OF

REDDING

CALIFORNIA
Capital Improvement Plan
2023–2028
Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
2023-24
TO
2028-29
Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A Introduction ......................................................................................................................... A-1 B General Overview
• Division Descriptions................................................................................................ B-1 • Project Summary...................................................................................................... B-6 • Funding Overview by Division ................................................................................ B-12 • Funding Overview by Source ................................................................................. B-16 C Detailed Program Summary
• Airports..................................................................................................................... C-1 • Community Services .............................................................................................. C-12 • Redding Electric Utility ........................................................................................... C-19 • Redding Fire Department……………………………………………………….…….....C-26 • Solid Waste ............................................................................................................ C-30 • Storm Drain Utility ..................................................................................................C-34 • Streets ....................................................................................................................C-36 • Wastewater ............................................................................................................ C-45 • Water...................................................................................................................... C-53 Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SECTION A

INTRODUCTION
Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

INTRODUCTION
The City of Redding’s 2023-24 to 2028-29 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a five-year outlook on anticipated capital projects in the City of Redding. The City is required by Government Code 66002 to prepare and adopt a CIP. This document is used as a tool to help ensure that the City’s short- and long-term capital investments are made in the context of careful consideration of the City’s needs as well as the resources available to fund the related capital projects.

THE CIP AND GOOD PLANNING
In general, all projects have their roots in the City’s General Plan and in a particular department’s master plan or other long-range planning document. For example, the General Plan includes goals and policies related to the City’s wastewater treatment and collection system while the Wastewater Master Plan incorporates this direction, accounts for expected growth and the condition of the existing infrastructure, anticipates revenue, and identifies resulting infrastructure needs. These needs are then rolled into projects, a project delivery schedule is developed and then the projects summarized in the CIP. Section 65103c of the Government Code requires planning agencies to review the CIP for consistency with the General Plan. The Planning Commission reviewed the CIP on April 9th 2024, and found it consistent with the General Plan.

THE CIP AND THE CITY’S 2-YEAR BUDGET AND 10-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN The budgeting for the City’s CIP starts
with the development of the City’s 2-
year budget and 10-year
financial plan. This biennial
process includes a
combination of detailed staff
analysis and broad public
involvement. It is during this
process that basic municipal
operational and specific
infrastructure needs are
identified and matched with
revenues generated from
various local, state and federal
funding sources. This CIP is a
projected $720 million plan
with revenue from 38 different
sources that can be grouped
into eight different funding
source categories. A detailed
breakdown of the CIP funding
by funding source can be
found beginning on page B15
while a summary by funding
source category is provided
on the chart.

PROJECT FUNDING TOTALS
A-1
Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

TEAM EFFORT IN BUILDING THE CIP
The document is prepared by the Engineering Division in the Public Works Department with input from all Departments in the City. As noted above, many other commissions, community groups and partners have ongoing input into the planning and budget documents that are the foundation of the CIP. The plan includes projects from all areas in the City including, but not limited to, projects that improve the City’s streets, sewer facilities, water facilities, storm drain facilities, airports, and park facilities. The major emphasis in this CIP is rehabilitation and replacement of aging infrastructure in the City’s five rate-funded utilities and streets program. This section contains two charts breaking out the CIP by program and each of the programs by their basic funding sources.

A-2
Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CIP ORGANIZATION
The document includes a general overview followed by detailed program-by-program summaries of the entire plan.

Section B - General Overview
The general overview includes an overview of each City division contributing to the CIP, followed by a division by division summary of all projects with projected project costs (project development plus construction) and anticipated year of construction and concluding with a detailed overview of the various funding sources.

Section C - Detailed Program Summaries
The detailed program summary includes an overview of the program including project by project summaries. These summaries include project descriptions, locations, funding sources, and anticipated schedule for when project development and construction funds will be needed.

Funding Legend
ATP – Active Transportation Program
CDBG – Community Development Block Grant
HBP – Local Highway Bridge Program
HSIP – Highway Safety Improvement Program
PFC – Passenger Facility Charge
SRTS – Safe Routes to School
STIP – State Transportation Improvement Program
PFC – Airport Passenger Facility Charge
RRA – City of Redding as Successor Agency for the Redding Redevelopment Agency A-3
Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SECTION B

GENERAL OVERVIEW
Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

AIRPORTS
There are two airports located within Redding. The Redding Regional Airport, located in the southeast portion of the City, is designated as a certified airport for commercial airline operations.

Benton Airpark, located close to Downtown Redding at Placer Street and Airpark Drive, is a general aviation facility which provides reliever support to the Redding Regional Airport. Both facilities are owned and operated by the City. The availability of convenient air transportation for residents and businesses is an asset to the community and can be used as a marketing tool in the City's economic development efforts.

The 2010 Airport Master Plans outline future improvements planned for the Redding Regional Airport and Benton Airpark. In addition to a listing of proposed improvement projects, the Master Plans identify estimated costs and general time frames (short-term, long-term, etc.) for installation of the improvements.

General Plan Consistency: The projects planned for both airports are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which promote the maintenance and enhancement of our airports to provide convenient airport service for the community and strive to minimize any adverse impacts resulting from aircraft operations or airport expansion. Reference: Goals CDD2, EJ6, PF11, and T9; Policies CDD2E, PF11B, PF11C, T9A.

COMMUNITY SERVICES
The Community Services Department oversees all the programming within the park system and the development, expansion, and enhancement of the park, trail, and open-space amenities. Currently, the City of Redding owns and operates a complete range of park and recreation facilities that include 68 park sites on approximately 598 acres of land. The park system includes the smallest of neighborhood parks, large regional parks, state-of-the-art athletic facilities, and special-use facilities, e.g., boat ramps and a dog park. The Department maintains over 39 miles of trails throughout the city. The trail system has been recognized by federal and state agencies as a model. The core of the trail system is the Sacramento River Trail with many connecting trails and public open spaces.

With several large athletic facilities completed in the last decade, including the Big League Dreams Park, the Redding Aquatic Center, and the Redding Soccer Park, resources have been redirected to the development of large neighborhood parks. Currently, the Department has agreements with five subdivision developers to build neighborhood parks concurrent with the houses. Park development fee credits will fund the bulk of the construction.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed park and recreation projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies which promote the improvement of park and recreation facilities Citywide. Reference: Goals EJ6, R2, R5, and R9-R13; Policies (all policies listed under the noted goals).

PUBLIC SAFETY
Police Department. The Redding Police Department has the primary responsibility of providing police protection and emergency-service response within the City limits. A mutual aid agreement is in effect with agencies on a statewide basis. The Redding Police Department has three main divisions – Administrative Services, Field Operations, and Investigations. Officers are assigned to B-1
Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) seven beats throughout the City and are dispatched to calls via radio and mobile data computer.

There are currently no planned 5-year capital improvements for the Police Department Fire Department. The Redding Fire Department has the primary responsibility of providing fire protection and emergency-service response within the City limits. A mutual aid agreement is in effect with California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) during the wildland fire season for wildland and structure fires within a one-mile fringe area surrounding the City. An automatic aid agreement with the Shasta County Fire Department is also in effect for structure fires outside the wildland fire season. Under these agreements, the Redding Fire Department responds within a onemile fringe area surrounding the City and to county islands. Shasta County Fire Department responds to a small geographic area on the east side of the City. The Redding Fire Department has three main divisions: Administration, Operations, and Fire Prevention. It operates from eight stations and a Fire Headquarters at City Hall.

REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY
As a California municipal corporation, the City of Redding owns, operates, and maintains power generation, transmission, and distribution facilities within the City limits. Given the investment in such facilities and a commitment to providing power at the lowest possible rates, it has historically been Redding's policy to be the sole provider of electric service within the City limits. As areas are annexed, City electric service is made available when PG&E facilities cannot be purchased or when service can be provided through a logical extension of the City's electric distribution system.

Redding Electric Utility (REU) presently provides service to its customers in an area approximately 61 square miles in size, with 72 miles of 115-kV transmission lines and 752 miles of overhead and underground 12-kV distribution lines. REU is proud of its record over the past year of 99.9994 percent electric service reliability (excluding the Carr Fire Damage).

To meet the demands of the changing state regulations due to wildfire and the increase of the distributed energy installations, the Electric Utility must adapt in the following ways. • Harden our existing distribution system as described in the REU Wildfire Mitigation Plan • Increase the operational efficiency of electrical system to quickly identify, track, and restore outages through the Outage Management System and workforce management tools. • Improve Communications Network to provide Operations & Engineering with real-time awareness of customer usage, circuit load, and system voltages to identify system bottlenecks.

The City of Redding filed its first comprehensive Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) with the California Energy Commission (CEC) in 2019 as required by state regulation, and will update the plan at least every five years as required. The IRP is a guidance document outlining the utility’s plan for meeting clean energy mandates and customer resource needs over the next 20 years, system upgrades needed to support load growth, managing load impacts from increased electrification adoption, and provides a framework for future resource procurements needed to support customer demands.

As the state increases the focus on carbon reduction through building and transportation electrification, the City has begun implementing policies and procedures to aid in the adoption of infrastructure supporting electrification. The City will evaluate the need to expand its electric transmission and distribution systems based on transmission system assessments and distribution B-2
Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) planning studies to reliably deliver energy to its customers. In addition to securing various long- and short-term power purchase contracts, the City owns and operates 183 MW of gas-fired generation within the City Limits.

General Plan Consistency. The projects planned for the Electric Utility are consistent with the General Plan’s goals, objectives, and policies, which promote programs that provide safe, reliable, and competitively priced electricity for existing and future City electric customers. Reference: REU’s 2021 Strategic Plan, 2019 Integrated Resource Plan, 2019 Wildfire Mitigation Plan; Goal CDD18, EJ6 and PF6; Policies CDD18A, CDD18B, CDD18C, PF6A – PF6E, and PF6H.

SOLID WASTE
Solid waste generated in the City is disposed of at Shasta County's Richard W. Curry/West Central Sanitary Landfill. Under existing state permits, the landfill has sufficient capacity to accommodate the disposal of solid waste at least to the year 2030. Expansion of the facility also appears to be plausible at such time as increased capacity is warranted beyond the extent of existing permits.

Although Shasta County owns the Richard W. Curry Landfill, it has contracted with the City of Redding for the operation and management of the facility. This arrangement was formalized in 1988. All residential, commercial, and industrial refuse in Redding is collected by City personnel.

Since 1995, the City has operated its own Solid Waste Transfer Station for the transfer of Citycollected residential, commercial, and industrial refuse and the transfer of self-haul public refuse.

The facility also has the capability of processing materials collected by curbside recycling programs and contains a household hazardous waste drop-off/processing area and a composting area.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed solid waste projects are consistent with the Solid Waste Facility Master Plan and the City’s General Plan goals, objectives, and policies, which promote the efficient collection and disposal of solid waste, while maintaining an adequate waste-disposal capacity. Reference: Goals CDD2, EJ6 and PF7; Policies CDD2E, PF7A, PF7C, PF7G, and PF7H.

STORM DRAINS

The Redding Planning Area contains 15 watershed basins. Public storm-drainage facilities within the City limits are operated and maintained by the City. Surrounding unincorporated areas are the responsibility of the County of Shasta. As new areas are annexed, the City assumes responsibility for storm-water management.

The City currently has a range of public and private storm-drain facilities to provide safe and efficient capture and conveyance of storm-water runoff and minimize the risks of flooding. Storm-drain facilities include more than 200 miles of storm drain pipe, over 7,000 inlets, 1,300 outfalls and 200 miles of open channel. These systems typically outfall into natural ravines or tributaries and ultimately to the Sacramento River.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed storm-drainage projects are consistent with the General Plan’s goals, objectives, and policies, which promote efforts to reduce flooding and to properly manage storm-water runoff from development. Reference Goals: CDD2, CDD4, PF1, PF8, and PS2; Policies CDD2E, PF1I, PF8A, PF8B, PF8E, and PS2F.

B-3
Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

STREETS
Redding is both defined and constrained by its network of highways, roads, trails, railroads, and transit services that move its residents and goods in, through, and out of the community. The City is responsible for ensuring the construction and maintenance of all public streets, sidewalks, bridges, bikeways, traffic signals, and street signage within the City limits. The City also maintains a variety of Caltrans facilities consistent with the terms of various cooperative agreements. Developers are either partially or totally responsible for new street construction depending on the type and location of the project. The City uses public funds to build or improve major streets when the improvements were not constructed as part of a land development project.

General Plan Consistency: The projects planned for streets are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which promote the development and maintenance of a safe and efficient public-street and bicycle-route system. Reference: Goal T1, T2, T5, T6, T8, PF10; Policies T1A, T1B, T1D, T1E, T1H, T1I, T1J, T1K, T2A, T5A, T6B, T6D, T8A, T8B, PF10A, PF10B, PF10C.

BUILDING MAINTENANCE
The Building Maintenance Division is responsible for many internal City functions including the maintenance and repair of the City's facilities such as City Hall, the Corporation Yard and the multiple Redding Fire Stations to name a few. There are currently no planned 5-year capital improvements for the division.

WASTEWATER
The City of Redding is the sole provider of wastewater service within the City limits. The wastewater system has two major service areas, one served by the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant and the other served by the Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant. Facilities include: the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, initially constructed in 1966, which currently has a capacity of 9.4 million gallons per day (mgd); the Stillwater Treatment Plant, put into service in 1992, which has a capacity of 4.0 mgd; and the wastewater collection system, which has approximately 430 miles of sewer mains, 17 lift stations, and over 7,000 manholes. The wastewater system serves nearly all developed property within the City, plus a few small developments in the surrounding unincorporated area. The City provides service to more than 43,000 household equivalents. One household equivalent is the average amount of wastewater produced by an average single-family residence, which is about 240 gallons per day.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed wastewater projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies which support efforts to achieve and maintain an adequate level of service in the City's sewage collection and treatment system as needed to meet existing and future needs. Reference: Goals CDD2, CDD18, EJ6, PF1, PF5, and NR9; Policies CDD2E, CDD18D, EJ6B, PF1I, PF1J, and PF5A – PF5D.

B-4
Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) WATER
The City provides water for domestic and fire-suppression uses to most of the City and to small portions of the surrounding unincorporated area. The water system is supplied by two treatment plants and well fields. Facilities include: the Foothill Treatment Plant, which has a capacity of 28 million gallons per day (mgd); the Buckeye Treatment Plant, which has a capacity of 14.0 mgd; the Enterprise and Cascade well systems, which have a capacity of 19.1 mgd; and the City's water distribution system, which has approximately 560 miles of water mains. The water system serves about 83 percent of the current population of Redding and about 1,800 residents in the surrounding unincorporated area. The water utility provides service to approximately 30,000 households.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed water projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which support efforts to maintain an adequate level of service in the City's water treatment and distribution system as needed to meet existing and future needs.

Reference: Goals CDD2, CDD18, EJ6, PF1, PF4, NR2 and NR9; Policies CDD2E, CDD18D, EJ6B, PF1I, PF1J, and PF4A - PF4C.

B-5
Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Airports
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
A-BEN-22-1 Runway Pavement Preservation 2023-24 $490,000 C-1 A-BEN-22-2 Eastside T-Hangar Taxilane Reconstruction 2026-27 $3,466,667 C-1 A-BEN-23-3 Northeast Apron and Taxilanes Reconstruction 2026-27 $2,750,000 C-1 A-BEN-23-4 Rehab Parallel Taxiway A 2026-27 $380,200 C-2 A-BEN-23-5 Underground Powerline RPZ 2025-26 $45,000 C-2 A-BEN-24-4 Westside T-Hanger Taxilane Reconstruction 2026-27 $4,170,000 C-2 A-BEN-25-2 Security Fencing - North RPZ 2027-28 $135,000 C-3 A-BEN-26-1 Terminal Construction Project 2028-29 $1,192,000 C-3 A-BEN-26-2 East Apron Pavement Rehabilitation 2028-29 $1,045,000 C-3 A-BEN-26-4 T-Hanger Taxiline Construction 2028-29 $750,000 C-4 A-BEN-26-5 Runway 15 Approach Tree Clearning 2027-28 $100,000 C-4 A-MUN-22-2 Terminal Assessment Study 2023-24 $500,000 C-4 A-MUN-22-5 Reconstruct Terminal/Airport Loop Access Road Phase III 2023-24 $2,833,880 C-5 A-MUN-22-6 Reconstruct Terminal/Airport Loop Access Road Phase IV 2023-24 $1,160,500 C-5 A-MUN-22-7 Runway 16-34 and Taxiway Connectors Rehabilitation 2025-26 $19,436,280 C-5 A-MUN-22-8 Master Plan Update 2023-24 $749,669 C-6
A-MUN-23-2 Wildlife Hazard Assessment 2027-28 $171,898 C-6 A-MUN-23-3 Runway 16-34 Grading and Runway 34 REIL Modifications 2026-27 $27,771,057 C-6 A-MUN-23-4 All Weather Perimeter Road 2025-26 $1,100,000 C-7 A-MUN-23-5 Perimeter Fencing, Access Control, and Wildfire Mitigation 2026-27 $700,000 C-7 A-MUN-23-6 PHI Hangar Roof 2023-24 $135,000 C-7
A-MUN-24-1 Terminal Construction Project 2024-25 $51,120,000 C-8 A-MUN-24-3 Runway 16-34, 12-30 and Taxiway Connectors - Phase II 2024-25 $19,180,491 C-8 A-MUN-24-4 Environmental Assessment 2024-25 $500,000 C-8 A-MUN-24-5 Acquire Snow Removal Equipment 2028-29 $270,850 C-9 A-MUN-24-7 Pavement Preservation 2026-27 $1,120,000 C-9 A-MUN-25-1 Airport Drainage Study 2023-24 $388,941 C-9
A-MUN-25-3 Runway 17-35 Extension 2026-27 $3,000,000 C-10 A-MUN-25-4 Northwest Apron Extension 2026-27 $2,627,052 C-10 A-MUN-26-1 Parallel Runway/Taxiway 2028-29 $11,600,000 C-10 A-MUN-26-2 Expand Solar Farm - Study & Design 2027-28 $200,000 C-11 A-MUN-26-3 Perimeter Fencing 2028-29 $7,750,000 C-11
A-MUN-26-4 Runway 16-34 Safety Area Improvements 2026-27 $21,488,700 C-11 $188,328,184
B-6
Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Community Services
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
CS-2005-21 Shastina Ranch Park Development 2023-24 $2,300,000 C-12 CS-2011-01 Salt Creek Heights Park 2023-24 $697,000 C-12 CS-2019-01 California Soccer Park 2023-24 $20,000 C-12
CS-2019-04 Northeast Crossing Trail (NEXT) 2023-24 $44,856 C-13 CS-2021-01 Caldwell Park Expansion Project 2023-24 $4,736,000 C-13 CS-2022-01 Panorama Park 2025-26 $10,000,000 C-13
CS-2022-02 Martin Luther King Building 2024-25 $560,000 C-14 CS-2022-03 South City Park 2023-24 $2,500,000 C-14
CS-2024-01 Stress Ribbon Bridge Art Project 2024-25 $607,710 C-14 CS-2024-02 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp 2023-24 $98,268 C-15
CS-2024-04 Burney Library Infrastructure Grant 2024-25 $451,942 C-15 CS-2024-05 Redding Library Infrastructure Grant 2024-25 $1,597,876 C-15 CS-2024-06 Anderson Library Infrastructure Grant 2024-25 $418,493 C-16 CS-2024-07 Jenny Creek 2024-25 $47,500 C-16
CS-2024-08 Canyon Hollow 2023-24 $25,459 C-16
CS-2024-09 Nur Pon Trail/Open Space Revitalization 2023-24 $53,724 C-17 CS-2024-10 Downtown Park - Whistle Stop Park 2023-24 $4,473,705 C-17 CS-2024-12 Redding Aquatic Center Improvements 2024-25 $350,000 C-17 CS-2024-13 Council Chambers and City Hall Roof Replacement 2023-24 $306,174 C-18 $29,288,706
REU
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
REU-2007-03 Electric Utility GIS Mapping (GIS Conversion) 2023-24 $335,850 C-19 REU-2011-02 Corporation Yard Expansion 2023-24 $67,240 C-19 REU-2011-07 Asphalt Paving (Plant Resurfacing) 2023-24 $99,170 C-19 REU-2017-13 Next Generation Firewalls 2023-24 $70,300 C-20 REU-2017-15 Redding Power Substation Controls Modernization 2023-24 $138,000 C-20 REU-2017-16 Substation Network Upgrades 2023-24 $15,900 C-20 REU-2018-01 T3000 Upgrades 2023-24 $79,290 C-21
REU-2018-02 Remote Commercial Meter 2023-24 $261,880 C-21 REU-2019-02 Unit 5 Breaker Replacement 2023-24 $350,000 C-21 REU-2019-03 Inter-Sub Fiber Project 2023-24 $4,641,640 C-22 REU-2019-06 RPP Security Improvement 2023-24 $70,000 C-22 REU-2019-07 Unit 4 Fire System Upgrade 2023-24 $228,830 C-22 REU-2019-08 GIS Software 2023-24 $376,290 C-23
REU-2019-09 Energy Trading Modernization 2023-24 $131,490 C-23 REU-2021-01 General System Improvements Ongoing $38,952,890 C-23 REU-2021-02 TO-TOP CIP Security Infrastructure 2023-24 $582,490 C-24 REU-2021-03 SB901 Tech Solutions 2023-24 $3,381,610 C-24 REU-2021-04 Future Revenue Funded Capital Projects Ongoing $8,544,741 C-24 REU-2022-01 Stillwater Substation 2024-25 $6,599,960 C-25 $64,927,571
B-7
Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
RFD
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
RFD-2023-05 Fire Station 5 Upgrades 2024-25 $151,000 C-26 RFD-2023-07 Fire Station 7 Upgrades 2024-25 $48,950 C-26 RFD-2023-08 Fire Station 8 Upgrades 2024-25 $33,000 C-26 RFD-2024-01 Fire Station 1 Build 2025-26 $9,900,000 C-27 RFD-2024-02 SCBA Replacement 2026-27 $1,000,000 C-27
RFD-2025-02 Fire Station 2 Upgrades 2026-27 $830,500 C-27 RFD-2025-03 Fire Station 3 Rebuild 2026-27 $5,500,000 C-28 RFD-2025-04 Fire Station 4 Upgrades 2026-27 $759,000 C-28 RFD-2025-06 Fire Station 6 Upgrages 2026-27 $759,000 C-28 RFD-2026-09 Fire Station 9 Build 2027-28 $6,600,000 C-29 $25,581,450
Solid Waste
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
SW-2026-01 West Side Hauling Yard 2025-26 $3,360,000 C-30 SW-2026-02 MRF Tipping Building Expansion 2025-26 $2,100,000 C-30 SW-2026-03 Organics Pre-Processing Expansion 2025-26 $1,540,000 C-30 SW-4941-01 Transfer Station Tipping Floor 2023-24 $600,000 C-31 SW-4941-02 Transfer Facility Resurface Asphalt Ongoing $850,000 C-31 SW-4941-03 Slurry Seal 2023-24 $152,000 C-31
SW-4941-06 Crane Repairs 2023-24 $282,000 C-32
SW-4941-08 Lift Station Retrofit 2023-24 $533,700 C-32
SW-4941-09 Organics Recycling Pilot Program 2023-24 $50,000 C-32 SW-4941-12 Administrative Office Remodel 2023-24 $92,680 C-33 SW-4941-13 Materials Recovery Facility Expansion 2024-25 $3,200,000 C-33 SW-4941-14 Marshalling Room Remodel 2026-27 $250,000 C-33 $13,010,380
Storm Drain
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
SD-2024-01 ARPA - Strom Drain Upgrades 2023-24 $1,333,170 C-34 SD-2024-02 Storm Drain Replacement Ongoing $1,594,812 C-34 SD-2024-03 Full Trash Capture Project Phase 1 2024-25 $655,000 C-34 SD-2026-01 Regional Detention 2026-27 $300,000 C-35
$3,882,982
B-8
Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Streets
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
ST-2022-01 Oregon Street Sidewalk 2024-25 $1,407,310 C-36 ST-2022-02 California St Bikeway Project 2024-25 $4,140,000 C-36 ST-2023-01 Systemic Left Turns 2024-25 $1,201,000 C-36
ST-2023-02 Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting 2023-24 $849,100 C-37 ST-3520-01 Small Projects Ongoing $1,200,000 C-37
ST-3520-01-4 Traffic Calming Ongoing $300,000 C-37
ST-3572-03 Bridge Maintenance Program Ongoing $849,999 C-38 ST-3580-01 Pavement Maintenance Ongoing $29,000,000 C-38 ST-4226-08 Canby Road Widening 2023-24 $300,000 C-38
ST-4226-09 Churn Creek/Rancho/Victor Roundabout 2024-25 $4,650,000 C-39 ST-4226-10 Traffic Signal Modification 2023-24 $292,895 C-39 ST-4407-01 Sidewalk Replacement Ongoing $1,500,000 C-39 ST-4638-15 ADA Curb Ramps Ongoing $825,000 C-40
ST-4775-05 Turtle Bay to Downtown 2024-25 $6,550,000 C-40 ST-4775-08 Victor & Cypress ATP (VCAT) 2023-24 $9,973,000 C-36 ST-4775-12 Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements 2023-24 $300,000 C-41 ST-4803-01 Airport Corridor Phase II 2024-25 $1,918,350 C-41 ST-4908-04 Old Alturas Road Bridge over Churn Creek 2024-25 $4,809,000 C-41 ST-4908-05 Sacramento Drive Bridge over Olney Creek 2024-25 $3,913,000 C-42 ST-4908-06 Eastside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow 2024-25 $3,865,000 C-42 ST-4908-07 Girvan Road Bridge over Olney Creek 2024-25 $2,455,000 C-42 ST-4908-08 Westside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow 2023-24 $3,537,632 C-43 ST-4908-09 Canyon Road Bridge over ACID Canal 2024-25 $2,142,200 C-43 ST-4908-10 Eastside Road Bridge over Olney Creek 2023-24 $4,655,676 C-43 ST-4956-04 Old Oregon Trail Widening 2024-25 $2,763,667 C-44 ST-NRTBD-01 Oasis Road Specific Plan Update 2028-29 $50,000 C-44 ST-SBP-01 Stillwater Business Park - Phase II 2023-24 $11,000,000 C-44 $104,447,829
B-9
Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Wastewater
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
WW-3512-01 Infiltration and Inflow Control Ongoing $8,160,820 C-45 WW-3525-01 Lift Station Improvements Ongoing $1,868,520 C-45 WW-4086-02 Westside Interceptor - Phase III 2024-25 $10,000,000 C-45 WW-4203-02 Repair/Replace Sewer Lines Ongoing $8,936,591 C-46 WW-4703-01 Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Ongoing $4,790,189 C-46 WW-4801-05 Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant Ongoing $3,258,759 C-46 WW-4801-10 Biosolids Pyrolysis - Phase I/II 2023-24 $12,797,271 C-47 WW-4801-11 Biosolids Pyrolysis - Phase III/IV 2026-27 $9,000,000 C-47 WW-LS-CC-04 Churn Creek Lift Station 2023-24 $774,600 C-47 WW-P-CC-01 Lake Redding Interceptor I 2025-26 $7,852,460 C-48 WW-P-CC-4 Buenaventura Sewer 2026-27 $3,950,000 C-48
WW-P-CC-5 Mercury Sewer 2028-29 $1,450,000 C-48
WW-P-S-06 Magnolia Sewer Repair Phase I 2023-24 $1,805,459 C-49 WW-P-S-07 Magnolia Sewer Repair Phase II 2025-26 $6,600,000 C-49 WW-P-S-08 Magnums Area Sewer 2024-25 $4,093,643 C-49
WW-P-S-10 Center Sewer 2026-27 $1,150,000 C-50
WW-P-S-11 Mary Lake Sewer 2025-26 $2,150,000 C-50
WW-P-S-12 Lake Keswick 2027-28 $3,550,000 C-50
WW-P-S-14 Lakeside Sewer 2028-29 $1,750,000 C-51
WW-TP-C-03 Clear Creek Pond Upgrades 2028-29 $3,413,095 C-51 WW-TP-C-06 Influent Screening 2025-26 $2,000,000 C-51
WW-TP-C-08 Co-Digestion & Bio-Gas Production 2024-25 $12,500,000 C-52 WW-TP-P-13 Bisulfite Project 2023-24 $275,880 C-52
WW-TP-S-6 Sludge Lagoons & Drying Beds 2023-24 $8,556,830 C-52 $120,684,118
B-10
Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Water
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
W-3020-01-02 Pump Station Improvements Ongoing $3,343,756 C-53 W-3020-04 Pump House 1 Replacement 2026-27 $45,477,603 C-53 W-4286-01 Replace Water Mains Ongoing $41,630,930 C-53
W-4286-19 Lake Boulevard 24" - Keswick to Masonic 2023-24 $8,012,160 C-54 W-4338-02 Well Rehabilitation Ongoing $978,219 C-54
W-4338-04 Well Head Treatment System 2023-24 $7,726,347 C-54 W-4338-05 Install Oxidation/Filtration at EW-14 2026-27 $4,035,690 C-55 W-4492-01 Foothill Water Treatment Plant Maintenance Ongoing $22,933,653 C-55 W-4600-02 Cypress Avenue Booster Pump Station 2023-24 $3,011,610 C-55 W-4606-01 Buckeye Water Treatment Plant Maintenance Ongoing $1,703,983 C-56 W-4795-03 Hill 900 Reservoir 2028-29 $6,205,150 C-56
W-4795-04-05 Reservoir Improvements Ongoing $2,475,000 C-56 WAADM23004 Athens Area Water Main 2023-24 $5,000,000 C-57 WAADM23013 Magnolia Area Improvements 2023-24 $867,750 C-57 WAADM23016 North Willis Area Water Line Replacement 2025-26 $5,200,000 C-57 WAADM23018 Water Main Improvement 2023 2023-24 $1,500,000 C-58 WAADM23024 Cascade Racquet Club 2023-24 $861,700 C-58
WAADM23048 Country Oaks Water Main 2024-25 $4,100,000 C-58 W-CONV-01 Hill 900 to Placer 2026-27 $2,000,000 C-59
W-CONV-04 Ranchettes 12" Water Main 2026-27 $1,500,000 C-59 W-RS-07-01 Buckeye Reservoir Booster Pump Station 2025-26 $1,500,000 C-59 $170,063,551
B-11
Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
Airports
Potential Funding Sources 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Airport Fund $233,000 $0 $51,528 $545,600 $33,660 $33,660 $955,113 Federal FAA Grant $3,742,351 $29,831,751 $61,076,407 $51,748,549 $1,553,425 $1,553,425 $166,709,903 PFC $3,320,918 $2,923,740 $6,156,229 $4,696,608 $119,273 $119,273 $19,783,698 State Aviation Grant $196,000 $0 $89,355 $446,400 $27,540 $27,540 $879,470 $7,492,269 $32,755,491 $67,373,519 $57,437,157 $1,733,898 $21,535,850 $188,328,184 Total Community Services
Potential Funding Sources 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total ARPA Grant $15,000 $545,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $560,000
Cal Trans Grant $4,208,705 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,208,705
Community Foundation of the
North State
$113,750 $493,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $607,710
General Fund $3,766,782 $1,495,427 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,262,209 Park Development Fund $318,724 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $318,724
Section 108 Loan, Park
Development
$2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
State Library Grant $40,000 $2,428,310 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,468,310 State Park Grant $2,044,856 $3,436,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $800,000 $13,280,856 WCB Public Access $82,192 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $82,192
$13,090,009 $8,398,697 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $29,288,706 Total B-12
Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
REU
Potential Funding Sources 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Electric Rates $17,593,878 $10,394,378 $13,834,325 $8,847,330 $7,128,830 $7,128,830 $64,927,571 $17,593,878 $10,394,378 $13,834,325 $8,847,330 $7,128,830 $7,128,830 $64,927,571 Total RFD
Potential Funding Sources 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total General Fund $0 $1,222,950 $10,460,000 $7,958,500 $5,940,000 $5,940,000 $25,581,450 $0 $1,222,950 $10,460,000 $7,958,500 $5,940,000 $0 $25,581,450 Total Solid Waste
Potential Funding Sources 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Solid Waste Rates/Fees $3,325,380 $2,040,000 $1,000,000 $2,395,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $13,010,380 $3,325,380 $2,040,000 $1,000,000 $2,395,000 $2,000,000 $2,250,000 $13,010,380 Total Storm Drain
Potential Funding Sources 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Storm Drain Connection Fees $1,333,170 $241,000 $0 $520,000 $0 $0 $2,288,170 Storm Drain Rates $244,812 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,594,812 $1,577,982 $741,000 $250,000 $770,000 $250,000 $294,000 $3,882,982 Total B-13
Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
Streets
Potential Funding Sources 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total AHSC Grant $730,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $730,000
ARPA Grant $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Federal CDBG Grant $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Federal EDA Grant $0 $3,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,410,000
Federal Grant $810,000 $810,000 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,442,000 Federal HBP Grant $8,124,631 $11,960,442 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $23,885,073 Federal HSIP Grant $357,060 $2,403,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,760,300 General Fund $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 Local Streets and Roads Fund $1,757,070 $6,510,912 $3,806,000 $3,330,000 $3,330,000 $3,330,000 $22,063,982 North Redding Traffic Benefit
District Fees
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
RRA Successor $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
SB1 RMRA $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 State ATP Grant $475,000 $475,000 $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000 State Grant $332,055 $1,589,454 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,921,509
Traffic Impact Fees $1,342,277 $2,392,688 $400,000 $4,350,000 $200,000 $200,000 $8,884,965 $17,303,093 $37,626,736 $28,503,000 $9,755,000 $5,605,000 $5,655,000 $104,447,829 Total Wastewater
Potential Funding Sources 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total CalRecycle Grant $0 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 Wastewater Rates $27,907,072 $20,054,990 $18,962,827 $16,462,247 $11,440,417 $11,440,417 $110,684,118 $27,907,072 $30,054,990 $18,962,827 $16,462,247 $11,440,417 $15,856,565 $120,684,118 Total B-14
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
Water
Potential Funding Sources 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Water Connection Fees $1,602,432 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,602,432 Water Rates $36,535,724 $12,133,300 $14,883,533 $55,543,277 $23,694,066 $23,694,066 $168,461,119 $38,138,156 $12,133,300 $14,883,533 $55,543,277 $23,694,066 $25,671,218 $170,063,551 Total The above is an overview of potential funding sources for projects contained in the main term of the Capital Improvement Plan and each project is subject to Redding City Council budgetary approval.

Note:

Grand Total $126,427,839 $135,367,542 $158,267,204 $163,168,511 $58,592,211 $78,391,463 $720,214,770 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
B-15
Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Source
Airport Fund
Funding Source 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Airport Fund $233,000 $0 $51,528 $545,600 $33,660 $91,325 $955,113 $233,000 $0 $51,528 $545,600 $33,660 $91,325 $955,113 Total General Fund
Funding Source 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total General Fund $4,703,174 $7,692,950 $15,460,000 $7,958,500 $5,940,000 $0 $41,754,624 $4,703,174 $7,692,950 $15,460,000 $7,958,500 $5,940,000 $0 $41,754,624 Total Grant
Funding Source 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total AHSC Grant $730,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $730,000
ARPA Grant $15,000 $1,545,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,560,000
Cal Trans Grant $4,208,705 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,208,705
CalRecycle Grant $0 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 Community Foundation of the North
State
$113,750 $493,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $607,710
Federal CDBG Grant $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Federal EDA Grant $0 $3,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,410,000
Federal FAA Grant $3,742,351 $29,831,751 $61,076,407 $51,748,549 $1,553,425 $18,757,420 $166,709,903 Federal Grant $810,000 $810,000 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,442,000 Federal HBP Grant $8,124,631 $11,960,442 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $23,885,073 Federal HSIP Grant $357,060 $2,403,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,760,300 RRA Successor $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Section 108 Loan, Park Development $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 State ATP Grant $475,000 $475,000 $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000 State Aviation Grant $196,000 $0 $89,355 $446,400 $27,540 $120,175 $879,470 State Grant $332,055 $1,589,454 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,921,509
State Library Grant $40,000 $2,428,310 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,468,310 State Park Grant $2,044,856 $3,436,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $13,280,856 WCB Public Access $82,192 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $82,192
$24,146,600 $68,458,157 $81,462,762 $56,269,949 $2,455,965 $18,952,595 $251,746,028 Total B-16
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Source
Impact Fees
Funding Source 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total North Redding Traffic Benefit District
Fees
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Storm Drain Connection Fees $1,333,170 $241,000 $0 $520,000 $0 $194,000 $2,288,170 Traffic Impact Fees $1,342,277 $2,392,688 $400,000 $4,350,000 $200,000 $200,000 $8,884,965 Water Connection Fees $1,602,432 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,602,432 $4,277,879 $2,633,688 $400,000 $4,870,000 $200,000 $444,000 $12,825,567 Total Local Streets and Roads Fund
Funding Source 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Local Streets and Roads Fund $1,757,070 $6,510,912 $3,806,000 $3,330,000 $3,330,000 $3,330,000 $22,063,982 SB1 RMRA $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 $3,757,070 $8,510,912 $5,806,000 $5,330,000 $5,330,000 $5,330,000 $34,063,982 Total Park Development Fund
Funding Source 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Park Development Fund $318,724 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $318,724
$318,724 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $318,724 Total
Park In-Lieu
Funding Source 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total General Fund $63,608 $25,427 $0 $0 $0 $0 $89,035
$63,608 $25,427 $0 $0 $0 $0 $89,035 Total
PFC
Funding Source 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total PFC $3,320,918 $2,923,740 $6,156,229 $4,696,608 $119,273 $2,566,930 $19,783,698 $3,320,918 $2,923,740 $6,156,229 $4,696,608 $119,273 $2,566,930 $19,783,698 Total B-17
Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Source
Utility Rates
Funding Source 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total Electric Rates $17,593,878 $10,394,378 $13,834,325 $8,847,330 $7,128,830 $7,128,830 $64,927,571 Solid Waste Rates/Fees $3,325,380 $2,040,000 $1,000,000 $2,395,000 $2,000,000 $2,250,000 $13,010,380 Storm Drain Rates $244,812 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $100,000 $1,594,812 Wastewater Rates $27,907,072 $20,054,990 $18,962,827 $16,462,247 $11,440,417 $15,856,565 $110,684,118 Water Rates $36,535,724 $12,133,300 $14,883,533 $55,543,277 $23,694,066 $25,671,218 $168,461,119 $85,606,866 $45,122,668 $48,930,685 $83,497,854 $44,513,313 $51,006,613 $358,678,000 Total The above is an overview of potential funding sources for projects contained in the main term of the Capital Improvement Plan and each project is subject to Redding City Council budgetary approval.

Note:

Grand Total $126,427,839 $135,367,542 $158,267,204 $163,168,511 $58,592,211 $78,391,463 $720,214,770 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
B-18
Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SECTION C

DETAILED PROGRAM

SUMMARIES
Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Runway Pavement Preservation
Description: Slurry seal to seal and maintain runway and replace runway markings.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$21,254
$490,000
$511,254
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-22-1
Airport Fund $98,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $98,000
Federal FAA Grant $196,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $196,000
State Aviation Grant $196,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $196,000
Total $490,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $490,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$490,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $490,000
$490,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $490,000
Eastside T-Hangar Taxilane Reconstruction
This project includes the reconstruction of 16,000 square yards of taxilanes on the eastside of Benton Airpark. These taxilanes are deteriorated and are needed to access City-owned t-hangars.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$3,466,667
$3,466,667
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-22-2
Airport Fund $0 $0 $9,167 $181,500 $0 $0 $190,667
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $150,000 $2,970,000 $0 $0 $3,120,000 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $7,500 $148,500 $0 $0 $156,000 Total $0 $0 $166,667 $3,300,000 $0 $0 $3,466,667
Project Development $0 $166,667
Construction
Total
$0 $166,667 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,300,000 $0 $0 $3,300,000
$0 $0 $166,667 $3,300,000 $0 $0 $3,466,667
Northeast Apron and Taxilanes Reconstruction
Description: To replace pavement rated as poor by the Airport Pavement Management Plan.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$2,750,000
$2,750,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-23-3
Airport Fund $0 $0 $17,050 $134,200 $0 $0 $151,250
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $279,000 $2,196,000 $0 $0 $2,475,000 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $13,950 $109,800 $0 $0 $123,750 Total $0 $0 $310,000 $2,440,000 $0 $0 $2,750,000
Project Development $0 $310,000
Construction
Total
$0 $310,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $2,440,000 $0 $0 $2,440,000
$0 $0 $310,000 $2,440,000 $0 $0 $2,750,000
C-1
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Rehab Parallel Taxiway A
Description: The eastside taxiway at Benton Airpark is in need of rehabilitation.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$380,200
$380,200
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-23-4
Airport Fund $0 $0 $3,036 $17,875 $0 $0 $20,911
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $2,484 $292,500 $0 $0 $294,984
State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $49,680 $14,625 $0 $0 $64,305 Total $0 $0 $55,200 $325,000 $0 $0 $380,200
Project Development $0 $55,200
Construction
Total
$0 $55,200 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $325,000 $0 $0 $325,000
$0 $0 $55,200 $325,000 $0 $0 $380,200
Underground Powerline RPZ
Description: Installing underground powerline under runway protection zone.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$45,000
$45,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-23-5
Airport Fund $0 $0 $2,475 $0 $0 $0 $2,475
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $40,500 $0 $0 $0 $40,500
State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $2,025 $0 $0 $0 $2,025
Total $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
$0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
Westside T-Hanger Taxilane Reconstruction
Description: To replace pavement rated as poor by the Airport Pavement Management Plan.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$4,170,000
$4,170,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-24-4
Airport Fund $0 $0 $19,800 $209,550 $0 $0 $229,350
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $324,000 $3,429,000 $0 $0 $3,753,000 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $16,200 $171,450 $0 $0 $187,650 Total $0 $0 $360,000 $3,810,000 $0 $0 $4,170,000
Project Development $0 $360,000
Construction
Total
$0 $360,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,810,000 $0 $0 $3,810,000
$0 $0 $360,000 $3,810,000 $0 $0 $4,170,000
C-2
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Security Fencing - North RPZ
Description: Installing security fencing around North Runway Protection Zone Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$135,000
$135,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-25-2
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $2,475 $4,950 $0 $7,425
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $40,500 $81,000 $0 $121,500
State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $2,025 $4,050 $0 $6,075
Total $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $90,000 $0 $135,000
Project Development $0 $45,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 $0 $90,000
$0 $0 $0 $45,000 $90,000 $0 $135,000
Terminal Construction Project
Description: Construction of new terminal.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$1,192,000
$1,192,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-26-1
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,310 $2,500 $15,810
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $217,800 $900,000 $1,117,800 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,890 $47,500 $58,390 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $242,000 $950,000 $1,192,000
Project Development $0 $242,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $242,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $950,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $242,000 $950,000 $1,192,000
East Apron Pavement Rehabilitation
Description: Rehabilitation of pavement.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$1,045,000
$1,045,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-26-2
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,225 $52,250 $57,475
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,500 $855,000 $940,500 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,275 $42,750 $47,025 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $950,000 $1,045,000
Project Development $0 $95,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $95,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000 $950,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $95,000 $950,000 $1,045,000
C-3
Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
T-Hanger Taxiline Construction
Description: Construction of taxiline to T-hanger.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$750,000
$750,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-26-4
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,675 $36,575 $41,250
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $76,500 $598,500 $675,000 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,825 $29,925 $33,750 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000 $665,000 $750,000
Project Development $0 $85,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $85,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $665,000 $665,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000 $665,000 $750,000
Runway 15 Approach Tree Clearning
Description: Improvements/maintenance - Runway 15
Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$100,000
$100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-26-5
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,500 $0 $5,500
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 $0 $90,000
State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,500 $0 $4,500
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $100,000
Terminal Assessment Study
Description: Assessment for new terminal.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$102,794
$500,000
$602,794
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-2
PFC $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Total $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Project Development $500,000 $500,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
C-4
Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Reconstruct Terminal/Airport Loop Access Road Phase III Construction of terminal access road connecting Woodrum Circle, Knighton Road, Flight Avenue, and Municipal Boulevard.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$2,540,726
$2,833,880
$5,374,606
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-5
Federal FAA Grant $566,776 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $566,776
PFC $2,267,104 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,267,104
Total $2,833,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,833,880
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,833,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,833,880
$2,833,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,833,880
Reconstruct Terminal/Airport Loop Access Road Phase IV
Construction of terminal access road connecting Woodrum Circle, Knighton Road, Flight Avenue, and Municipal Boulevard.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$784,698
$1,160,500
$1,945,198
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-6
Federal FAA Grant $928,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $928,400
PFC $232,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $232,100
Total $1,160,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,160,500
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,160,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,160,500
$1,160,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,160,500
Runway 16-34 and Taxiway Connectors Rehabilitation
Description: Design phase for project including 4-inch mill and overlay, blast pad reconstruction and MAGVAR for runways Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$1,042,125
$19,436,280
$20,478,405
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-7
Federal FAA Grant $891,424 $0 $14,657,600 $0 $0 $0 $15,549,024 PFC $222,856 $0 $3,664,400 $0 $0 $0 $3,887,256
Total $1,114,280 $0 $18,322,000 $0 $0 $0 $19,436,280
Project Development $1,114,280 $1,114,280
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $18,322,000 $0 $0 $0 $18,322,000
$1,114,280 $0 $18,322,000 $0 $0 $0 $19,436,280
C-5
Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Master Plan Update
Airport Layout Plan Update & Narrative Report, inlcuding an Aeronautical AGIS Survey, Terminal Expansion Study, Energy Audit Assessment, Environmental Surveys, and Land Use Analysis Study.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$316,828
$749,669
$1,066,496
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-8
Federal FAA Grant $691,959 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $691,959
PFC $57,709 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,709
Total $749,669 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $749,669
Project Development $749,669 $749,669
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$749,669 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $749,669
Wildlife Hazard Assessment
Description: Wildlife hazard assessment and wildlife hazard management plan development.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$171,898
$171,898
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-2
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $158,665 $0 $158,665
PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,233 $0 $13,233
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $171,898 $0 $171,898
Project Development $0 $17,190
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $17,190 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $154,708 $0 $154,708
$0 $0 $0 $0 $171,898 $0 $171,898
Runway 16-34 Grading and Runway 34 REIL Modifications
Design and Construction for Runway 16-34 RSA Grading, Shoulder, and Drainage Improvements, Runway 34 REIL Modifications, and Electrical Improvements.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$27,771,057
$27,771,057
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-3
Federal FAA Grant $0 $6,776,835 $0 $18,400,405 $0 $0 $25,177,240 PFC $0 $698,165 $0 $1,895,652 $0 $0 $2,593,817
Total $0 $7,475,000 $0 $20,296,057 $0 $0 $27,771,057
Project Development $0 $2,777,106
Construction
Total
$747,500 $0 $2,029,606 $0 $0
$0 $6,727,500 $0 $18,266,451 $0 $0 $24,993,951
$0 $7,475,000 $0 $20,296,057 $0 $0 $27,771,057
C-6
Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
All Weather Perimeter Road
Design and Construction for perimeter road needed for vehicles transitioning from N to S side of airfield. Necessary to prevent FOD and to be undistributed after hazardous weather conditions.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$1,100,000
$1,100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-4
Federal FAA Grant $0 $90,660 $906,600 $0 $0 $0 $997,260 PFC $0 $9,340 $93,400 $0 $0 $0 $102,740
Total $0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000
Project Development $0 $100,000
Construction
Total
$100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
$0 $100,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,100,000
Perimeter Fencing, Access Control, and Wildfire Mitigation Description: Brand new system installed for performing necessary badging procedures as required by TSA.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$700,000
$700,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-5
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $60,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $560,000 PFC $0 $0 $15,000 $125,000 $0 $0 $140,000
Total $0 $0 $75,000 $625,000 $0 $0 $700,000
Project Development $0 $75,000
Construction
Total
$0 $75,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $625,000 $0 $0 $625,000
$0 $0 $75,000 $625,000 $0 $0 $700,000
PHI Hangar Roof
Description: Landlord obligation to repair leaking roof of PHI Hangar Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$135,000
$135,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-6
Airport Fund $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000
Total $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000
Project Development $13,500 $13,500
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$121,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $121,500
$135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000
C-7
Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Terminal Construction Project
Description: Brand new system installed for performing necessary badging procedures as required by TSA.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$51,120,000
$51,120,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-1
Federal FAA Grant $108,792 $5,700,000 $42,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $48,558,792 PFC $11,208 $300,000 $2,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,561,208
Total $120,000 $6,000,000 $45,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $51,120,000 Project Development $12,000 $612,000
Construction
Total
$600,000 $0 $0 $0
$108,000 $5,400,000 $45,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,508,000
$120,000 $6,000,000 $45,000,000 $0 $0 $51,120,000
Runway 16-34, 12-30 and Taxiway Connectors - Phase II
Description: Construction phase for project including 4-inch mill and overlay, blast pad reconstruction and initial electrical.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$19,180,491
$19,180,491
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-3
Federal FAA Grant $0 $17,264,256 $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,264,256 PFC $0 $1,916,235 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,916,235
Total $0 $19,180,491 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,180,491
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $19,180,491 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,180,491
$0 $19,180,491 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,180,491
Environmental Assessment
Description: Parallel Runway 4,000 x 47 feet with a visual approach.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$500,000
$500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-4
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $453,300 $0 $0 $453,300
PFC $0 $0 $0 $46,700 $0 $0 $46,700
Total $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
Project Development $0 $500,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
C-8
Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Acquire Snow Removal Equipment
Description: Purchase of high-speed runway sweeper.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$270,850
$270,850
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-5
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $250,000
PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,850 $20,850
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $270,850 $270,850
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $270,850 $270,850
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $270,850 $270,850
Pavement Preservation
Description: Design and Construction for pavement preservation project.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$1,120,000
$1,120,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-7
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $108,792 $906,600 $0 $0 $1,015,392 PFC $0 $0 $11,208 $93,400 $0 $0 $104,608
Total $0 $0 $120,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,120,000
Project Development $0 $120,000
Construction
Total
$0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,000,000
$0 $0 $120,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $1,120,000
Airport Drainage Study
Comprehensive analysis of airport outfall system including runway safety areas to verify proper drainage on the airfield.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$226,000
$388,941
$614,941
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-25-1
Federal FAA Grant $359,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $359,000
PFC $29,941 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,941
Total $388,941 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $388,941
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$388,941 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $388,941
$388,941 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $388,941
C-9
Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Runway 17-35 Extension
Description: Environmental Assessment and Design for Runway Extension, including Parallel Taxiway and Connectors.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$3,000,000
$3,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-25-3
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $2,719,800 $0 $0 $2,719,800
PFC $0 $0 $0 $280,200 $0 $0 $280,200
Total $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000
Project Development $0 $300,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $2,700,000 $0 $0 $2,700,000
$0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000
Northwest Apron Extension
Description: Extension of Apron for transient parking and added relief for fire fighting operations as needed.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$2,627,052
$2,627,052
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-25-4
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $806,880 $1,440,000 $0 $0 $2,246,880 PFC $0 $0 $20,172 $360,000 $0 $0 $380,172
Total $0 $0 $827,052 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $2,627,052
Project Development $0 $165,410
Construction
Total
$0 $165,410 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $661,642 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $2,461,642
$0 $0 $827,052 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $2,627,052
Parallel Runway/Taxiway
Description: Parallel Runway/Taxiway includes New Electrical Vault - 4,000 x 47 feet with a visual approach.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$11,600,000
$11,600,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-26-1
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $453,300 $10,063,260 $10,516,560 PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,700 $1,036,740 $1,083,440
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $11,100,000 $11,600,000
Project Development $0 $500,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,100,000 $11,100,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $11,100,000 $11,600,000
C-10
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Expand Solar Farm - Study & Design
Plan to expand solar farm that currently exists at the airport to reduce carbon foot print and energy costs with expansion of airport and future development.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$200,000
$200,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-26-2
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,660 $90,660 $181,320
PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,340 $9,340 $18,680
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000
Project Development $0 $200,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000
Perimeter Fencing
Description: Design and construction for perimeter access control system/wildlife mitigation fencing.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$7,750,000
$7,750,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-26-3
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $6,000,000 $6,200,000 PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $1,500,000 $1,550,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $7,500,000 $7,750,000
Project Development $0 $250,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,500,000 $7,500,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $7,500,000 $7,750,000
Runway 16-34 Safety Area Improvements
Description: Design and Construction for 16-34 RSA Improvements Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$21,488,700
$21,488,700
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-26-4
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $990,551 $18,400,444 $100,000 $0 $19,490,995 PFC $0 $0 $102,049 $1,895,656 $0 $0 $1,997,705
Total $0 $0 $1,092,600 $20,296,100 $100,000 $0 $21,488,700 Project Development $0 $2,148,870
Construction
Total
$0 $109,260 $2,029,610 $10,000 $0
$0 $0 $983,340 $18,266,490 $90,000 $0 $19,339,830
$0 $0 $1,092,600 $20,296,100 $100,000 $0 $21,488,700
C-11
Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Shastina Ranch Park Development
Construct 7-acre park site on dedicated land in the SE quadrant located in a subdivision under development.

Includes a multi-purpose playing field, playgrounds, shaded picnic areas, and trail connections to adjacent public open-space areas.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
SE Quadrant, Rancho Road/Shasta View Drive
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$34,466
$2,300,000
$2,334,466
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2005-21
General Fund $2,000,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300,000 Total $2,000,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300,000
Project Development $300,000 $300,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,700,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
$2,000,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300,000
Salt Creek Heights Park
Design and construction of 8-acre park site on dedicated land in the SE quadrant located in Salt Creek Heights subdivision. The project will include a multi-purpose playing field, playgrounds, shaded picnic areas, trail connections, and a restroom.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
SW Quadrant, off Eureka Way
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$903,000
$697,000
$1,600,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2011-01
General Fund $577,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $697,000
Total $577,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $697,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$577,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $697,000
$577,000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $697,000
California Soccer Park
Replace four synthetic turf fields at the existing athletic facility and install additional shade structures. The artificial turf and the underlying drainage system installed during the Park's construction were defective.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
NE Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Park Improvement
$5,130,000
$20,000
$5,150,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2019-01
General Fund $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
$20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
C-12
Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Northeast Crossing Trail (NEXT)
Create 2,900 feet of bicycle path linking to existing non-motorized trails and the City's commercial core. Includes the installation of bridge crossing over Boulder Creek and LED lighting along the trail, planting of 60 trees and temporary irrigation.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
NE Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$1,301,160
$44,856
$1,346,016
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2019-04
State Park Grant $44,856 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,856
Total $44,856 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,856
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$44,856 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,856
$44,856 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,856
Caldwell Park Expansion Project
A grant funded expansion and improvement of Caldwell Park, featuring a new bike park, expanded skate park, lighting, and parking. Project also includes a new restroom, exercise equipment, shade structures and public art.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
NW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$2,000,000
$4,736,000
$6,736,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2021-01
State Park Grant $2,000,000 $2,736,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,736,000 Total $2,000,000 $2,736,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,736,000
Project Development $400,000 $400,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,600,000 $2,736,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,336,000
$2,000,000 $2,736,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,736,000
Panorama Park
Grant funded project on dedicated land and recreation facility. Includes construction of trails, landscaping, playground and parking.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Lake Boulevard
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$10,000,000
$10,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2022-01
General Fund $500,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 State Park Grant $0 $700,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $8,500,000 Total $500,000 $1,700,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $10,000,000 Project Development $500,000 $500,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,700,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $9,500,000 $500,000 $1,700,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $800,000 $0 $10,000,000 C-13
Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Martin Luther King Building
Description: Remodel of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Building.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
SW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$560,000
$560,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2022-02
ARPA Grant $15,000 $545,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $560,000
Total $15,000 $545,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $560,000
Project Development $15,000 $15,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $545,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $545,000
$15,000 $545,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $560,000
South City Park
Description: Revilatization of South City Park with new design and construction.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
SW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$2,500,000
$2,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2022-03
Section 108 Loan, Park $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 Development
Total $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
Project Development $250,000 $250,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,250,000
$2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
Stress Ribbon Bridge Art Project
Phase I, painting a mural on the abutments of the Stress Ribbon Bridge (Complete), Phase II painting the bridge rails to match the mural (Will be complete 2023), Phase III completition and installation of a sculpture near the bridge.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
NW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Art installation, bridge, and
$131,920
$607,710
$739,630
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-01
Community Foundation of the $113,750 $493,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $607,710 North State
Total $113,750 $493,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $607,710
Project Development $113,750 $227,500
Construction
Total
$113,750 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $380,210 $0 $0 $0 $0 $380,210
$113,750 $493,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $607,710
C-14
Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp
Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
SW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Boat Ramp
$13,924
$98,268
$112,192
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-02
General Fund $16,076 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,076
WCB Public Access $82,192 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $82,192
Total $98,268 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $98,268
Project Development $9,827 $9,827
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$88,441 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $88,441
$98,268 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $98,268
Burney Library Infrastructure Grant
Description: Projects include a new backup generator, security and lighting, roof replacment, solar, and HVAC UV filtration system.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
37116 Main St. | Burney, CA 96013
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvement
$1,168
$451,942
$453,110
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-04
State Library Grant $2,500 $449,442 $0 $0 $0 $0 $451,942 Total $2,500 $449,442 $0 $0 $0 $0 $451,942
Project Development $250 $45,194
Construction
Total
$44,944 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,250 $404,497 $0 $0 $0 $0 $406,747
$2,500 $449,442 $0 $0 $0 $0 $451,942
Redding Library Infrastructure Grant
Projects include new generator housing, backup generator, new carpet/LVT, lighting control planels, batteries for ELESCO Emergency Lighting, New HVAC controls, and HVAC UV filtration Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
1100 Parkview Ave., Redding, CA 96001
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvement
$9,472
$1,597,876
$1,607,348
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-05
State Library Grant $35,000 $1,562,876 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,597,876 Total $35,000 $1,562,876 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,597,876
Project Development $3,500 $159,788
Construction
Total
$156,288 $0 $0 $0 $0
$31,500 $1,406,588 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,438,088
$35,000 $1,562,876 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,597,876
C-15
Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Anderson Library Infrastructure Grant
The City is working on security improvements, HVAC UV filtration system, new roof and solar, backup generator consultant and design, backup generator construction
Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
3200 W. Center St, Anderson, CA 96007
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvement
$10,729
$418,493
$429,221
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-06
State Library Grant $2,500 $415,993 $0 $0 $0 $0 $418,493 Total $2,500 $415,993 $0 $0 $0 $0 $418,493
Project Development $250 $41,849
Construction
Total
$41,599 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,250 $374,393 $0 $0 $0 $0 $376,643
$2,500 $415,993 $0 $0 $0 $0 $418,493
Jenny Creek
The Jenny Creek Trail project is located off Royal Oaks Drive, connecting T.R. Woods Memorial Park to the Overhill Drive connector to the Sacramento River Trail. The CCC will construct the first phase of the project, an approximately .8-mile trail corridor, by clearing, grading, and placing base rock in preparation for asphalt paving.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
SW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Trail Development
$12,500
$47,500
$60,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-07
General Fund $22,073 $25,427 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,500
Total $22,073 $25,427 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,500
Project Development $2,207 $4,750
Construction
Total
$2,543 $0 $0 $0 $0
$19,866 $22,884 $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,750
$22,073 $25,427 $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,500
Canyon Hollow
Description: Three (3) miles of Moutain Bike Trail in Redding to City Limits Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
SW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Trail Development
$14,542
$25,459
$40,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-08
General Fund $25,459 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,459
Total $25,459 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,459
Project Development $2,546 $2,546
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$22,913 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,913
$25,459 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $25,459
C-16
Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Nur Pon Trail/Open Space Revitalization
Description: Revitalization of walking trails to allow community access to walking through this beautiful and historical site.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
SW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Trail Development
$30,201
$53,724
$83,925
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-09
Park Development Fund $53,724 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $53,724
Total $53,724 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $53,724
Project Development $5,372 $5,372
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$48,352 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,352
$53,724 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $53,724
Downtown Park - Whistle Stop Park
The project consists of the construction of a public park at 1470 Market St, Redding CA 96001. The project will include landscaping, irrigation, a fog misting system, walking path, boulders, lighting and a pavilion.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
1470 Market Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$4,473,705
$4,473,705
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-10
Cal Trans Grant $4,208,705 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,208,705
Park Development Fund $265,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $265,000
Total $4,473,705 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,473,705
Project Development $447,371 $447,371
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,026,335 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,026,335
$4,473,705 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,473,705
Redding Aquatic Center Improvements
Description: Updating bathrooms and other improvement projects Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
44 Quartz Hill Road, Redding, CA
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$350,000
$350,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-12
General Fund $300,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
Total $300,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
Project Development $30,000 $35,000
Construction
Total
$5,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$270,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $315,000
$300,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
C-17
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Council Chambers and City Hall Roof Replacement
Description: Council Chambers improvement project and City Hall Roof Replacement Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
777 Cypress Ave, Redding, CA
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvement
$0
$306,174
$306,174
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-13
General Fund $306,174 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $306,174
Total $306,174 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $306,174
Project Development $30,617 $30,617
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$275,557 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,557
$306,174 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $306,174
C-18
Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Electric Utility GIS Mapping (GIS Conversion)
Converting REU’s existing linear based drawing data into an information-based system, including acquiring necessary data platforms and the conversion of the existing data into GIS.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$1,423,270
$335,850
$1,759,120
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2007-03
Electric Rates $335,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $335,850
Total $335,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $335,850
Corporation Yard Expansion
Required to construct a distribution dispatch center for both organizational efficiencies and as mandated by FERC and NERC regulatory requirements.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
20055 Viking Way
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Expansion
$184,283
$67,240
$251,523
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2011-02
Electric Rates $67,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $67,240
Total $67,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $67,240
Asphalt Paving (Plant Resurfacing)
Addition of concrete or asphalt surfaces to areas of the plant enhances plant safety, cleanliness, and ease of operation.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$50,831
$99,170
$150,001
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2011-07
Electric Rates $99,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $99,170
Total $99,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $99,170
C-19
Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Next Generation Firewalls
Purchase and install next generation firewalls at power control center and Avtech to segment the operational network data from business data.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road/3611 Avtech Parkway
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$49,696
$70,300
$119,996
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2017-13
Electric Rates $70,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,300
Total $70,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,300
Redding Power Substation Controls Modernization
The controls for this substation are part of a System wide substation control modernization project. Replacement of SCADA equipment manufactured by C3-Ilex and control panels that utilize obsolete mechanical protective relays.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Multiple Substations
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$138,000
$138,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2017-15
Electric Rates $138,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $138,000
Total $138,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $138,000
Substation Network Upgrades
Annual update to lifecycle operational computers and network equipment. Substations currently need upgrades to Subnet Solutions computers running Windows XP to eliminate the security risks.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Multiple Substations
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$10,051
$15,900
$25,951
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2017-16
Electric Rates $15,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,900
Total $15,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,900
C-20
Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
T3000 Upgrades
Software updgrades to the T3000 system, an SEI distributed controls system (DCS) software and hardware product, to operate and monitor the Redding Power Plant generating units.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$397,744
$79,290
$477,034
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2018-01
Electric Rates $79,290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,290
Total $79,290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $79,290
Remote Commercial Meter
Installation of 1700 electric revenue meters to increase the number of system data points feeding into the Outage Management System and Distribution Management System providing the SO's critical information, improving outage response and restoration time.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$1,344,587
$261,880
$1,606,467
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2018-02
Electric Rates $261,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,880
Total $261,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $261,880
Unit 5 Breaker Replacement
Description: Replace generator breaker with better system.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$350,000
$350,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-02
Electric Rates $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
Total $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000
C-21
Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Inter-Sub Fiber Project
Description: Installing fiber from Redding Power to Moore Rd, Moore Rd to Waldon, and Waldon to Oregon.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Multiple Substations
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$458,365
$4,641,640
$5,100,005
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-03
Electric Rates $1,441,640 $1,500,000 $1,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,641,640 Total $1,441,640 $1,500,000 $1,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,641,640 RPP Security Improvement
Modificaiton of front gate to incorporate an entrance and exit gate, relocation of guard shack to the center of the driveway with a new floor plan, and add Cardlock type locks to buildings in the plant site that hold controls or other sensitive equipment.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$70,000
$70,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-06
Electric Rates $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
Total $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
Unit 4 Fire System Upgrade
Description: Creating working space after removal of steam boilers.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$11,178
$228,830
$240,008
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-07
Electric Rates $228,830 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,830
Total $228,830 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $228,830
C-22
Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
GIS Software
Description: Project to allow for a GIS software application upgrade and development of new distribution utility network.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
3611 Avtech Parkway
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$11,224
$376,290
$387,514
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-08
Electric Rates $376,290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $376,290
Total $376,290 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $376,290
Energy Trading Modernization
Description: Ongoing internal costs to maintain software requested for energy trading modernization project.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$1,138,522
$131,490
$1,270,012
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-09
Electric Rates $131,490 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $131,490
Total $131,490 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $131,490
General System Improvements
General system improvements including the installation of transformers, capacitor banks, poles, overhead and underground conductors and switches, splices/connectors, conduit, splice boxes and vaults.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing System Improvements
REU-2021-01
Electric Rates $8,102,890 $6,050,000 $6,050,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $38,952,890 Total $8,102,890 $6,050,000 $6,050,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $6,250,000 $38,952,890 C-23
Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
TO-TOP CIP Security Infrastructure
CIP Security Equipment including Physical Access, Cyber-Servers, and Network Upgrades to PCC and Backup PCC Facility.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
3611 Avtech Parkway
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$167,520
$582,490
$750,010
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2021-02
Electric Rates $582,490 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $582,490
Total $582,490 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $582,490
SB901 Tech Solutions
Technology implementation to minimize sources of ignition, manage vegetation within the City’s electric grid, harden systems, more effectively protect and notify the public if an issue arises, as well as shorten response and recovery time.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
3611 Avtech Parkway
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$7,506,018
$3,381,610
$10,887,628
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2021-03
Electric Rates $3,381,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,381,610
Total $3,381,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,381,610
Future Revenue Funded Capital Projects
Description: Future Revenue Funded Capital Projects.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing System Improvements
REU-2021-04
Electric Rates $1,261,048 $1,844,378 $2,084,325 $1,597,330 $878,830 $878,830 $8,544,741 Total $1,261,048 $1,844,378 $2,084,325 $1,597,330 $878,830 $878,830 $8,544,741 C-24
Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Stillwater Substation
Future development plans on the east side of Redding necessitate REU building a new substation. Addresses system capability and service reliability as Redding adds new load.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Venture Parkway
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$42
$6,599,960
$6,600,002
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2022-01
Electric Rates $599,960 $1,000,000 $4,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $6,599,960 Total $599,960 $1,000,000 $4,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $6,599,960 C-25
Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 5 Upgrades
Upgrades to Fire Station #5, including exterior paint, PPE containment, generator relocation and the remodel of the Battalion Chief Quarters.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
955 Hartnell Ave
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$151,000
$151,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2023-05
General Fund $0 $151,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $151,000
Total $0 $151,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $151,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $151,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $151,000
$0 $151,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $151,000
Fire Station 7 Upgrades
Description: Upgrades to Fire Station #7, including exterior paint, PPE containment, new counter tops and water filtration system.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
3772 Flight Ave
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$48,950
$48,950
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2023-07
General Fund $0 $48,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,950
Total $0 $48,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,950
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $48,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,950
$0 $48,950 $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,950
Fire Station 8 Upgrades
Description: Upgrades to Fire Station #8, including exterior paint and PPE containment Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
131 Churn Creek Rd
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$33,000
$33,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2023-08
General Fund $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,000
Total $0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,000
$0 $33,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $33,000
C-26
Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 1 Build
Description: New build of 12,000 sq. ft. Fire Station.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
1335 Shasta St
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Build
$0
$9,900,000
$9,900,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2024-01
General Fund $0 $990,000 $8,910,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,900,000 Total $0 $990,000 $8,910,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,900,000
Project Development $0 $990,000
Construction
Total
$990,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $8,910,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,910,000
$0 $990,000 $8,910,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,900,000
SCBA Replacement
Description: New self contained breathing apparatus units for fire stations.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
All Fire Stations
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2024-02
General Fund $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Total $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Fire Station 2 Upgrades
Description: Remodel and expansion of Fire Station #2, including adding 2,000 square feet, exterior paint and a generator.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
3491 Placer St
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$830,500
$830,500
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-02
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $830,500 $0 $0 $830,500
Total $0 $0 $0 $830,500 $0 $0 $830,500
Project Development $0 $83,050
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $83,050 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $747,450 $0 $0 $747,450
$0 $0 $0 $830,500 $0 $0 $830,500
C-27
Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 3 Rebuild
Description: Rebuild of Fire Station #3.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
4255 Westside Rd
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$5,500,000
$5,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-03
General Fund $0 $0 $550,000 $4,950,000 $0 $0 $5,500,000 Total $0 $0 $550,000 $4,950,000 $0 $0 $5,500,000
Project Development $0 $550,000
Construction
Total
$0 $550,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $4,950,000 $0 $0 $4,950,000
$0 $0 $550,000 $4,950,000 $0 $0 $5,500,000
Fire Station 4 Upgrades
Description: Remodel and 2,000 sq. ft expansion of Fire Station #4.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2605 S Bonnyview Rd
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$759,000
$759,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-04
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $759,000 $0 $0 $759,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $759,000 $0 $0 $759,000
Project Development $0 $75,900
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $75,900 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $683,100 $0 $0 $683,100
$0 $0 $0 $759,000 $0 $0 $759,000
Fire Station 6 Upgrages
Description: Remodel and 2,000 sq. ft expansion of Fire Station #6.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
1695 Beltline Rd
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$759,000
$759,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-06
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $759,000 $0 $0 $759,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $759,000 $0 $0 $759,000
Project Development $0 $75,900
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $75,900 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $683,100 $0 $0 $683,100
$0 $0 $0 $759,000 $0 $0 $759,000
C-28
Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 9 Build
Description: Build new Fire Station on East side.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
East Side
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Build
$0
$6,600,000
$6,600,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2026-09
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $660,000 $5,940,000 $0 $6,600,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $660,000 $5,940,000 $0 $6,600,000
Project Development $0 $660,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $660,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $5,940,000 $0 $5,940,000
$0 $0 $0 $660,000 $5,940,000 $0 $6,600,000
C-29
Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
West Side Hauling Yard
To expand the facility to the City owned property on the west side of Abernathy Lane, relocating driver and truck parking and marshalling room.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$3,360,000
$3,360,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-2026-01
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $0 $480,000 $960,000 $960,000 $960,000 $3,360,000 Total $0 $0 $480,000 $960,000 $960,000 $960,000 $3,360,000 Project Development $0 $336,000
Construction
Total
$0 $48,000 $96,000 $96,000 $96,000
$0 $0 $432,000 $864,000 $864,000 $864,000 $3,024,000
$0 $0 $480,000 $960,000 $960,000 $960,000 $3,360,000
MRF Tipping Building Expansion
Expand the MRF processing building for additional receiving, storing, and processing recyclables, inclusive of upgrades to sorting and screening equipment with innovative technology.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$2,100,000
$2,100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-2026-02
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $0 $300,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $2,100,000 Total $0 $0 $300,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $2,100,000 Project Development $0 $210,000
Construction
Total
$0 $30,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000
$0 $0 $270,000 $540,000 $540,000 $540,000 $1,890,000
$0 $0 $300,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $2,100,000
Organics Pre-Processing Expansion
Installation of organics preprocessing equipment for food waste as part of a " Food Waste to Energy" project in collaboration with the City' s wastewater treatment plant.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$1,540,000
$1,540,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-2026-03
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $0 $220,000 $440,000 $440,000 $440,000 $1,540,000 Total $0 $0 $220,000 $440,000 $440,000 $440,000 $1,540,000 Project Development $0 $154,000
Construction
Total
$0 $22,000 $44,000 $44,000 $44,000
$0 $0 $198,000 $396,000 $396,000 $396,000 $1,386,000
$0 $0 $220,000 $440,000 $440,000 $440,000 $1,540,000
C-30
Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Transfer Station Tipping Floor
The tipping floor is subject to use by heavy equipment and garbage trucks and wears down over time, requiring periodic resurfacing.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-01
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 Total $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000
Project Development $60,000 $60,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$540,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $540,000
$600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000
Transfer Facility Resurface Asphalt
The asphalt within the facility is over 18 years old and failing due to aging and daily use by heavy equipment and trucks.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-02
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $250,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $850,000 Total $250,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $850,000
Project Development $25,000 $85,000
Construction
Total
$35,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
$225,000 $315,000 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $765,000
$250,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $850,000
Slurry Seal
Description: Slurry seal to seal and maintain the driveways within the Transfer and Recycling Facility.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-03
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $102,000 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $152,000 Total $102,000 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $152,000
Project Development $10,200 $15,200
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $5,000 $0 $0
$91,800 $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $136,800
$102,000 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $152,000
C-31
Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Crane Repairs
The crane is used to adjust loads in the transfer trailers prior to hauling to the landfill. Crane repairs cover the cost of replacing parts due to daily wear and tear on the machine.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-06
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $97,000 $90,000 $0 $95,000 $0 $0 $282,000 Total $97,000 $90,000 $0 $95,000 $0 $0 $282,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$97,000 $90,000 $0 $95,000 $0 $0 $282,000
$97,000 $90,000 $0 $95,000 $0 $0 $282,000
Lift Station Retrofit
Description: To increase stormwater handling capacity.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$545,600
$533,700
$1,079,300
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-08
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $533,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $533,700 Total $533,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $533,700
Project Development $106,740 $106,740
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$426,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $426,960
$533,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $533,700
Organics Recycling Pilot Program
Pilot program consisting of de-bagger and grinder to prepare material to inter the Wastewater System. Future implementation of organics recycling beyond the pilot project is estimated to be a multi-million dollar project. Data on cost and timeline TBD.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$50,000
$50,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-09
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Total $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Project Development $5,000 $5,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000
$50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
C-32
Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Administrative Office Remodel
Description: Remodel administrative building to create additional workspace for growing staff.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$92,680
$92,680
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-12
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $92,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,680
Total $92,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,680
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$92,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,680
$92,680 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,680
Materials Recovery Facility Expansion
Description: Replacement of sorting screens and conveyor belts to update machine and improve processing capacity.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$3,200,000
$3,200,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-13
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Total $1,600,000 $1,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000
Project Development $160,000 $320,000
Construction
Total
$160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,440,000 $1,440,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000
$160,000 $1,600,000 $1,440,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000
Marshalling Room Remodel
Extensive remodel of both the men and women’s bathroom facilities increasing the size of the men’s restroom by removing walls and relocating plumbing and electrical.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$250,000
$250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-14
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000
Project Development $0 $25,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $25,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $225,000 $0 $0 $225,000
$0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $250,000
C-33
Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Storm Drain
ARPA - Strom Drain Upgrades
Description: Install new storm drain system in area with existing roadside swales and ditches.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Hawthorne and Canby
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$666,830
$1,333,170
$2,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-2024-01
Storm Drain Connection Fees $1,333,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,333,170 Total $1,333,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,333,170
Project Development $133,317 $133,317
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,199,853 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,199,853
$1,333,170 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,333,170
Storm Drain Replacement
Description: Critical pipe lining at various locations throughout the City.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$1,594,812
$1,594,812
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-2024-02
Storm Drain Rates $244,812 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $100,000 $1,594,812 Total $244,812 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $100,000 $1,594,812 Project Development $24,481 $159,481
Construction
Total
$50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $10,000
$220,331 $450,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $90,000 $1,435,331 $244,812 $500,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $100,000 $1,594,812 Full Trash Capture Project Phase 1
Description: Installation of full trash capture devices in storm drain system to comply with state mandates.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$655,000
$655,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-2024-03
Storm Drain Connection Fees $0 $241,000 $0 $220,000 $0 $194,000 $655,000 Total $0 $241,000 $0 $220,000 $0 $194,000 $655,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $241,000 $0 $220,000 $0 $194,000 $655,000
$0 $241,000 $0 $220,000 $0 $194,000 $655,000
C-34
Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Storm Drain
Regional Detention
Description: Install new storm drain system in area with existing roadside swales.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Crossfire and Tarmac
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$300,000
$300,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SD-2026-01
Storm Drain Connection Fees $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000
Project Development $0 $45,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $255,000 $0 $0 $255,000
$0 $0 $0 $300,000 $0 $0 $300,000
C-35
Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Oregon Street Sidewalk
Extend concrete box culvert for Calaboose Creek along Oregon Street from Shasta Street to Yuba Street. Fill sidewalk gaps, tie in paving and install pedestrian lighting,
Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Oregon Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvements
$98,973
$1,407,310
$1,506,283
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-2022-01
Local Streets and Roads Fund $202,190 $1,205,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,407,310 Total $202,190 $1,205,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,407,310
Project Development $20,219 $140,731
Construction
Total
$120,512 $0 $0 $0 $0
$181,971 $1,084,608 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,266,579
$202,190 $1,205,120 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,407,310
California St Bikeway Project
Construction of a two-way Class IV bikeway along California Street between Yuba Street and Tehama Street.

Improvements of pedestrian access by rebuilding curb ramps, creating bulb-outs, and increasing crossing visability.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
California St between Yuba and Tehama
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$224,159
$4,140,000
$4,364,159
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-2022-02
AHSC Grant $730,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $730,000
Federal EDA Grant $0 $3,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,410,000
Total $730,000 $3,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,140,000
Project Development $73,000 $414,000
Construction
Total
$341,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$657,000 $3,069,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,726,000
$730,000 $3,410,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,140,000
Systemic Left Turns
Provide left turn lanes and left turn protected phasing where none exists at selected intersections. Includes striping between intersections to facilitate intersection modifications.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$6,136
$1,201,000
$1,207,136
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-2023-01
Local Streets and Roads Fund $21,000 $99,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,100 State Grant $189,000 $891,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,080,900
Total $210,000 $991,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,201,000
Project Development $21,000 $120,100
Construction
Total
$99,100 $0 $0 $0 $0
$189,000 $891,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,080,900
$210,000 $991,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,201,000
C-36
Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting
Install new intersection safety lighting where none exists and correct deficient existing lighting at un-signalized intersections.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$849,100
$849,100
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-2023-02
Local Streets and Roads Fund $1,445 $7,046 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,491 State Grant $143,055 $697,554 $0 $0 $0 $0 $840,609
Total $144,500 $704,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $849,100
Project Development $14,450 $84,910
Construction
Total
$70,460 $0 $0 $0 $0
$130,050 $634,140 $0 $0 $0 $0 $764,190
$144,500 $704,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $849,100
Small Projects
Various traffic operation and capacity improvements. Funds will be used as match for grant-funded projects or leverage for development projects.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
ST-3520-01
Traffic Impact Fees $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 Total $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 Project Development $20,000 $120,000
Construction
Total
$20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
$180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $1,080,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 Traffic Calming
Description: Install devices to reduce speeds and cut-through traffic in residential neighborhoods.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
ST-3520-01-4
Local Streets and Roads Fund $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 Total $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 Project Development $5,000 $30,000
Construction
Total
$5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
$45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $270,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 C-37
Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Bridge Maintenance Program
Description: Bridge Maintenance Grant funding various repairs of 7 Bridges.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Bridges Improvements
$9,550
$849,999
$859,549
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-3572-03
Federal HBP Grant $134,565 $511,703 $0 $0 $0 $0 $646,268 Local Streets and Roads Fund $17,435 $66,296 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $203,731 Total $152,000 $577,999 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $849,999 Project Development $15,200 $85,000
Construction
Total
$57,800 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000
$136,800 $520,199 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $764,999 $152,000 $577,999 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $849,999 Pavement Maintenance
Description: Roadway surface maintenance work conducted annually on various streets.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvements
ST-3580-01
ARPA Grant $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Local Streets and Roads Fund $1,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $16,000,000 SB1 RMRA $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 Total $3,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $29,000,000 Project Development $300,000 $2,900,000
Construction
Total
$600,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
$2,700,000 $5,400,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $26,100,000 $3,000,000 $6,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $29,000,000 Canby Road Widening
Description: Widen Canby Road north of Browning along the west side. Includes curb, gutter, and sidewalk.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Canby Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$61,558
$300,000
$361,558
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-08
Traffic Impact Fees $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Total $50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Project Development $5,000 $30,000
Construction
Total
$25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$45,000 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $270,000
$50,000 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
C-38
Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Churn Creek/Rancho/Victor Roundabout
Description: Construct roundabout at convergence of Churn Creek Road with both Victor Avenue and Rancho Road.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Churn Creek/Ranch/Victor Intersection
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$3,460
$4,650,000
$4,653,460
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-09
Traffic Impact Fees $100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $4,150,000 $0 $0 $4,650,000 Total $100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $4,150,000 $0 $0 $4,650,000 Project Development $10,000 $465,000
Construction
Total
$20,000 $20,000 $415,000 $0 $0
$90,000 $180,000 $180,000 $3,735,000 $0 $0 $4,185,000
$100,000 $200,000 $200,000 $4,150,000 $0 $0 $4,650,000
Traffic Signal Modification
Description: Modification of traffic signal at various corners to support widening.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Buenaventura Blvd at Sunset Avenue
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$51,247
$292,895
$344,142
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-10
Traffic Impact Fees $292,895 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $292,895
Total $292,895 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $292,895
Project Development $29,290 $29,290
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$263,606 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $263,606
$292,895 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $292,895
Sidewalk Replacement
Description: Annual project to replace worn and/or damaged sections of existing sidewalks.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
ST-4407-01
Local Streets and Roads Fund $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 Total $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 Project Development $25,000 $150,000
Construction
Total
$25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
$225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $1,350,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 C-39
Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
ADA Curb Ramps
Description: Install ADA-accessible curb ramps at various intersections throughout the city.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Widening/Extension
ST-4638-15
Federal CDBG Grant $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Local Streets and Roads Fund $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $375,000 Total $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $825,000 Project Development $20,000 $82,500
Construction
Total
$20,000 $20,000 $7,500 $7,500 $7,500
$180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $67,500 $67,500 $67,500 $742,500 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $825,000 Turtle Bay to Downtown
Turtle Bay to Downtown Multi-use trail connecting Dana to Downtown and Turtle Bay boat ramp to Continental.

Includes a tunnel; shared use path; and pedestrian safety lighting.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
North of (parallel to) SR44
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening
$422,639
$6,550,000
$6,972,639
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4775-05
State ATP Grant $475,000 $475,000 $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000 Total $475,000 $475,000 $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000
Project Development $47,500 $655,000
Construction
Total
$47,500 $560,000 $0 $0 $0
$427,500 $427,500 $5,040,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,895,000
$475,000 $475,000 $5,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000
Victor & Cypress ATP (VCAT)
The project will complete sidewalk gaps, install ADA ramps, narrow travel lanes to provide standard bike lanes, and add street lighting along Churn Creek Road and Maraglia Street. An enhanced crosswalk will also be installed on Churn Creek Road with a refuge island and rectangular rapid flashing beacons.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Churn Creek Rd. between Hartnell and Cypress and
Maraglia St. between Churn Creek and Hilltop.

Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$268,992
$9,973,000
$10,241,992
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4775-08
Federal Grant $810,000 $810,000 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,442,000 Local Streets and Roads Fund $90,000 $90,000 $351,000 $0 $0 $0 $531,000 Total $900,000 $900,000 $8,173,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,973,000
Project Development $190,611 $492,122
Construction
Total
$301,511 $0 $0 $0 $0
$762,444 $1,206,043 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,790,487
$953,055 $1,507,554 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,282,609
C-40
Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
Competitive grant-funded projects to improve safety along street right-of-way. Contingent upon grant approval from various programs.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$1,011,419
$300,000
$1,311,419
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4775-12
Federal HSIP Grant $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Total $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Project Development $30,000 $30,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$270,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $270,000
$300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Airport Corridor Phase II
Description: Widen Airport Road for additional capacity and operational safety.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Airport Road Corridor
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening/Extension
$81,155
$1,918,350
$1,999,505
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4803-01
Local Streets and Roads Fund $0 $1,618,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,618,350 RRA Successor $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Total $300,000 $1,618,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,918,350
Project Development $30,000 $191,835
Construction
Total
$161,835 $0 $0 $0 $0
$270,000 $1,456,515 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,726,515
$300,000 $1,618,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,918,350
Old Alturas Road Bridge over Churn Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Old Alturas Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$1,252,211
$4,809,000
$6,061,211
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-04
Federal HBP Grant $90,000 $4,169,910 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,259,910 Traffic Impact Fees $10,000 $539,090 $0 $0 $0 $0 $549,090 Total $100,000 $4,709,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,809,000
Project Development $10,000 $480,900
Construction
Total
$470,900 $0 $0 $0 $0
$90,000 $4,238,100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,328,100
$100,000 $4,709,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,809,000
C-41
Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Sacramento Drive Bridge over Olney Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Sacramento Drive over Olney Creek.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Sacramento Drive
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$1,001,070
$3,913,000
$4,914,070
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-05
Federal HBP Grant $63,000 $50,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,913,000 Total $63,000 $50,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,913,000
Project Development $6,300 $391,300
Construction
Total
$5,000 $380,000 $0 $0 $0
$56,700 $45,000 $3,420,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,521,700
$63,000 $50,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,913,000
Eastside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow
Description: Replace the bridge on Eastside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Eastside Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$586,027
$3,865,000
$4,451,027
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-06
Federal HBP Grant $57,505 $3,364,140 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,421,645 Traffic Impact Fees $7,495 $435,860 $0 $0 $0 $0 $443,355 Total $65,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,865,000
Project Development $6,500 $386,500
Construction
Total
$380,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$58,500 $3,420,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,478,500
$65,000 $3,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,865,000
Girvan Road Bridge over Olney Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Girvan Road over Olney Creek.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Girvan Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$489,378
$2,455,000
$2,944,378
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-07
Federal HBP Grant $44,265 $2,129,147 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,173,412 Traffic Impact Fees $5,735 $275,853 $0 $0 $0 $0 $281,588 Total $50,000 $2,405,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,455,000
Project Development $5,000 $245,500
Construction
Total
$240,500 $0 $0 $0 $0
$45,000 $2,164,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,209,500
$50,000 $2,405,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,455,000
C-42
Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Westside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow
Description: Replace the bridge on Railroad Avenue over Canyon Hollow Creek Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Westside Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$545,181
$3,537,632
$4,082,813
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-08
Federal HBP Grant $3,452,670 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,452,670
Traffic Impact Fees $84,962 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $84,962
Total $3,537,632 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,537,632
Project Development $353,763 $353,763
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$3,183,869 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,183,869
$3,537,632 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,537,632
Canyon Road Bridge over ACID Canal
Description: Replace the bridge on Canyon Road over the ACID Canal.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Canyon Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$455,264
$2,142,200
$2,597,464
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-09
Federal HBP Grant $160,950 $1,735,542 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,896,492 Traffic Impact Fees $20,850 $224,858 $0 $0 $0 $0 $245,708 Total $181,800 $1,960,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,142,200
Project Development $18,180 $214,220
Construction
Total
$196,040 $0 $0 $0 $0
$163,620 $1,764,360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,927,980
$181,800 $1,960,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,142,200
Eastside Road Bridge over Olney Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Eastside Road over Olney Creek.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Eastside Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$761,283
$4,655,676
$5,416,959
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4908-10
Federal HBP Grant $4,121,676 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,121,676
Traffic Impact Fees $534,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $534,000
Total $4,655,676 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,655,676
Project Development $465,568 $465,568
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$4,190,108 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,190,108
$4,655,676 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,655,676
C-43
Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Old Oregon Trail Widening
Description: Widen and realign Old Oregon Trail from Paso Robles to Bear Mountain Road.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Old Oregon Trail
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening/Extension
$918,075
$2,763,667
$3,681,742
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4956-04
Federal HSIP Grant $57,060 $2,403,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,460,300 Traffic Impact Fees $36,340 $267,027 $0 $0 $0 $0 $303,367 Total $93,400 $2,670,267 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,763,667
Project Development $9,340 $276,367
Construction
Total
$267,027 $0 $0 $0 $0
$84,060 $2,403,240 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,487,300
$93,400 $2,670,267 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,763,667
Oasis Road Specific Plan Update
Description: Update the Oasis Road Specific Plan.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
North Redding Traffic Benefit District
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$50,000
$50,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-NRTBD-01
North Redding Traffic Benefit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000 District Fees
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Project Development $0 $5,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $45,000 $45,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $50,000
Stillwater Business Park - Phase II
Description: Improvements to Stillwater Business Park.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Stillwater Business Park
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$11,000,000
$11,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-SBP-01
General Fund $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 Total $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000 Project Development $100,000 $1,100,000
Construction
Total
$500,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0
$900,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $9,900,000
$1,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $11,000,000
C-44
Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Infiltration and Inflow Control
Repair and rehabilitation of various aging sewer mains throughout the City as needed to reduce rainwater intrusion into the sewer system.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Collection System Improvement
WW-3512-01
Wastewater Rates $2,160,820 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $8,160,820 Total $2,160,820 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $8,160,820 Project Development $216,082 $816,082
Construction
Total
$100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $200,000
$1,944,738 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $900,000 $1,800,000 $7,344,738 $2,160,820 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $8,160,820 Lift Station Improvements
Description: Repair/Rehab Lift Stations
Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Collection System Improvement
WW-3525-01
Wastewater Rates $287,330 $295,350 $305,440 $315,880 $326,680 $337,840 $1,868,520 Total $287,330 $295,350 $305,440 $315,880 $326,680 $337,840 $1,868,520 Project Development $57,466 $373,704
Construction
Total
$59,070 $61,088 $63,176 $65,336 $67,568
$229,864 $236,280 $244,352 $252,704 $261,344 $270,272 $1,494,816 $287,330 $295,350 $305,440 $315,880 $326,680 $337,840 $1,868,520 Westside Interceptor - Phase III
Expansion of the main sewer serving the west region of the City to accommodate growth. Phase III will run from Girvan Road south to the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Girvan Road to the Clear Creek WWTP
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$559,579
$10,000,000
$10,559,579
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-4086-02
Wastewater Rates $0 $6,500,000 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 Total $0 $6,500,000 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000
Project Development $0 $2,000,000
Construction
Total
$1,300,000 $700,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $5,200,000 $2,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000
$0 $6,500,000 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000
C-45
Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Repair/Replace Sewer Lines
Description: Replace aging and damaged clay piping throughout the city.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Collection System Improvement
WW-4203-02
Wastewater Rates $1,649,500 $999,500 $1,256,857 $309,067 $721,667 $4,000,000 $8,936,591 Total $1,649,500 $999,500 $1,256,857 $309,067 $721,667 $4,000,000 $8,936,591 Project Development $164,950 $893,659
Construction
Total
$99,950 $125,686 $30,907 $72,167 $400,000
$1,484,550 $899,550 $1,131,171 $278,160 $649,500 $3,600,000 $8,042,932 $1,649,500 $999,500 $1,256,857 $309,067 $721,667 $4,000,000 $8,936,591 Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Description: Ongoing major maintenance
Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
WW-4703-01
Wastewater Rates $1,213,249 $668,140 $690,970 $714,580 $739,000 $764,250 $4,790,189 Total $1,213,249 $668,140 $690,970 $714,580 $739,000 $764,250 $4,790,189 Project Development $121,325 $479,019
Construction
Total
$66,814 $69,097 $71,458 $73,900 $76,425
$1,091,924 $601,326 $621,873 $643,122 $665,100 $687,825 $4,311,170 $1,213,249 $668,140 $690,970 $714,580 $739,000 $764,250 $4,790,189 Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant
Description: Ongoing major maintenance
Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6475 Airport Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
WW-4801-05
Wastewater Rates $892,489 $442,000 $457,100 $472,720 $488,870 $505,580 $3,258,759 Total $892,489 $442,000 $457,100 $472,720 $488,870 $505,580 $3,258,759 Project Development $89,249 $325,876
Construction
Total
$44,200 $45,710 $47,272 $48,887 $50,558
$803,240 $397,800 $411,390 $425,448 $439,983 $455,022 $2,932,883 $892,489 $442,000 $457,100 $472,720 $488,870 $505,580 $3,258,759 C-46
Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Biosolids Pyrolysis - Phase I/II
Description: Full scale build-out for Biosolids final processing.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$2,027,427
$12,797,271
$14,824,698
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-4801-10
Wastewater Rates $9,797,271 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,797,271 Total $9,797,271 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,797,271
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$9,797,271 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,797,271
$9,797,271 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,797,271
Biosolids Pyrolysis - Phase III/IV
Description: Future scale build-out for Biosolids final processing.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$9,000,000
$9,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-4801-11
Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $9,000,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $9,000,000
Project Development $0 $900,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $400,000 $500,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,600,000 $4,500,000 $0 $8,100,000
$0 $0 $0 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $9,000,000
Churn Creek Lift Station
Description: Churn Creek Lift Station rehabilitation project.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2300 Goodwater Avenue
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$774,600
$774,600
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-LS-CC-04
Wastewater Rates $774,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $774,600
Total $774,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $774,600
Project Development $77,460 $77,460
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$697,140 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $697,140
$774,600 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $774,600
C-47
Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Lake Redding Interceptor I
Construct approximately 790 feet of 27" pipe, 4,710 feet of 24" pipe, and 60 feet of 21" pipe from N Market Lift Station to Elk Drive.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Lake Redding Estates
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$120,000
$7,852,460
$7,972,460
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-01
Wastewater Rates $100,000 $0 $5,252,460 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $0 $7,852,460 Total $100,000 $0 $5,252,460 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $0 $7,852,460 Project Development $100,000 $875,246
Construction
Total
$0 $525,246 $125,000 $125,000 $0
$0 $0 $4,727,214 $1,125,000 $1,125,000 $0 $6,977,214
$100,000 $0 $5,252,460 $1,250,000 $1,250,000 $0 $7,852,460 Buenaventura Sewer
Description: Replacement of undersized sewer pipe ranging in size from 12- to 18-inches in diameter.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Buenaventura Blvd and Westside Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$3,950,000
$3,950,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-4
Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $450,000 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $3,950,000 Total $0 $0 $450,000 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $3,950,000
Project Development $0 $395,000
Construction
Total
$0 $45,000 $350,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $405,000 $3,150,000 $0 $0 $3,555,000
$0 $0 $450,000 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $3,950,000
Mercury Sewer
Description: Replace approximately 1,670 feet of existing 8-inch diameter AC pipe with 12-inch diameter pipe.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Mercury Drive Area
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$1,450,000
$1,450,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-5
Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $1,200,000 $1,450,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $1,200,000 $1,450,000
Project Development $0 $250,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $250,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $1,200,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $1,200,000 $1,450,000
C-48
Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Magnolia Sewer Repair Phase I
Description: Rehabilitation for sanitary sewer mains and lowers laterals. Includes manhole replacement and cover installation.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Magnolia Area
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$4,447,511
$1,805,459
$6,252,970
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-06
Wastewater Rates $1,805,459 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,805,459
Total $1,805,459 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,805,459
Project Development $180,546 $180,546
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,624,913 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,624,913
$1,805,459 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,805,459
Magnolia Sewer Repair Phase II
Description: Rehabilitation for sanitary sewer mains and lowers laterals. Includes manhole replacement and cover installation.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Magnolia Area
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$6,600,000
$6,600,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-07
Wastewater Rates $0 $520,000 $2,080,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $6,600,000 Total $0 $520,000 $2,080,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $6,600,000 Project Development $0 $1,128,000
Construction
Total
$520,000 $208,000 $400,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,872,000 $3,600,000 $0 $0 $5,472,000
$0 $520,000 $2,080,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $6,600,000
Magnums Area Sewer
Installation of 23,725 linear feet of sewer line in the Magnums Lane remote area. Includes rehabilitation of all existing manholes.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Lake Blvd E to Beltline Rd
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$3,257
$4,093,643
$4,096,900
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-08
Wastewater Rates $393,643 $3,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,093,643 Total $393,643 $3,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,093,643
Project Development $78,729 $818,729
Construction
Total
$740,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$314,914 $2,960,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,274,914
$393,643 $3,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,093,643
C-49
Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Center Sewer
Description: Increase 1500 feet of sewer line from 12-inches to 15-inches.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Center Area
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$1,150,000
$1,150,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-10
Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $250,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $1,150,000 Total $0 $0 $250,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $1,150,000
Project Development $0 $250,000
Construction
Total
$0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $900,000 $0 $0 $900,000
$0 $0 $250,000 $900,000 $0 $0 $1,150,000
Mary Lake Sewer
Description: Increase pipe diameter from 8-inches to 10-inches for approximately 5150 feet.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Mary Lake Area
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$2,150,000
$2,150,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-11
Wastewater Rates $0 $430,000 $1,720,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,150,000 Total $0 $430,000 $1,720,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,150,000
Project Development $0 $430,000
Construction
Total
$430,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,720,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,720,000
$0 $430,000 $1,720,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,150,000
Lake Keswick
Description: Increase pipe diameter from 12-inches to 15-inches for approximately 2010 feet.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Lake Keswick Area
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$3,550,000
$3,550,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-12
Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $710,000 $2,840,000 $3,550,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $710,000 $2,840,000 $3,550,000
Project Development $0 $355,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $355,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $355,000 $2,840,000 $3,195,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $710,000 $2,840,000 $3,550,000
C-50
Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Lakeside Sewer
Increase pipe diameter from 8-inch to 12-inch for 1200 feet, 10-inch to 18-inch for 750 feet and 12-inch to 18-inch for 700 feet.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Eureka Way & Buenaventura Blvd
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$1,750,000
$1,750,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-S-14
Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $1,500,000 $1,750,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $1,500,000 $1,750,000
Project Development $0 $400,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $250,000 $150,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,350,000 $1,350,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $1,500,000 $1,750,000
Clear Creek Pond Upgrades
Description: Lining of emergency retention ponds.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$3,631,930
$3,413,095
$7,045,025
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-C-03
Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $176,050 $677,224 $853,274 Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $528,150 $2,031,671 $2,559,821 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $704,200 $2,708,895 $3,413,095
Project Development $0 $704,200
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $704,200 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,708,895 $2,708,895
$0 $0 $0 $0 $704,200 $2,708,895 $3,413,095
Influent Screening
Description: Screening at influent pump station.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-C-06
Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Total $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Project Development $0 $400,000
Construction
Total
$0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,600,000
$0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
C-51
Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Co-Digestion & Bio-Gas Production
Description: Construction of food waste receiving and bio-gas production facility at Clear Creek WWTP.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$12,500,000
$12,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-C-08
CalRecycle Grant $0 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 Wastewater Rates $0 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000
Total $0 $12,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,500,000
Project Development $0 $500,000
Construction
Total
$500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $12,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000,000
$0 $12,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,500,000
Bisulfite Project
Description: Alternate de-chlorination chemical process for Clear Creek WWTP.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2220 Metz Road & 6475 Airport Rd
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$275,880
$275,880
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-P-13
Wastewater Rates $275,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,880
Total $275,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,880
Project Development $27,588 $27,588
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$248,292 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $248,292
$275,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,880
Sludge Lagoons & Drying Beds
Description: Construction of sludge lagoons at Stillwater Treatment Plant Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
6475 Airport Road
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$156,162
$8,556,830
$8,712,992
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-S-6
Wastewater Rates $8,556,830 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,556,830
Total $8,556,830 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,556,830
Project Development $855,683 $855,683
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$7,701,147 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,701,147
$8,556,830 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,556,830
C-52
Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Pump Station Improvements
Description: Rehab/repair pump stations Pump Stations 3 & 4 Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
W-3020-01-02
Water Rates $238,810 $245,470 $252,313 $266,577 $2,066,577 $274,009 $3,343,756 Total $238,810 $245,470 $252,313 $266,577 $2,066,577 $274,009 $3,343,756 Project Development $23,881 $334,376
Construction
Total
$24,547 $25,231 $26,658 $206,658 $27,401
$214,929 $220,923 $227,082 $239,919 $1,859,919 $246,608 $3,009,380 $238,810 $245,470 $252,313 $266,577 $2,066,577 $274,009 $3,343,756 Pump House 1 Replacement
Environmental review for replacing Pump House 1 on the Sacramento River. Alternatives include rehabbing at current location or constructing a new pump house at various upstream locations.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
2300 Riverside Drive
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$1,422,409
$45,477,603
$46,900,012
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-3020-04
Water Rates $6,477,603 $0 $0 $39,000,000 $0 $0 $45,477,603 Total $6,477,603 $0 $0 $39,000,000 $0 $0 $45,477,603
Project Development $6,477,603 $6,477,603
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $39,000,000 $0 $0 $39,000,000
$6,477,603 $0 $0 $39,000,000 $0 $0 $45,477,603
Replace Water Mains
Description: Replace cast-iron, steel, asbestos, galvanized and degraded water mains throughout the City.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Distribution System
W-4286-01
Water Rates $813,960 $2,300,000 $6,497,200 $8,796,640 $10,555,968 $12,667,162 $41,630,930 Total $813,960 $2,300,000 $6,497,200 $8,796,640 $10,555,968 $12,667,162 $41,630,930 Project Development $81,396 $4,163,093
Construction
Total
$230,000 $649,720 $879,664 $1,055,597 $1,266,716
$732,564 $2,070,000 $5,847,480 $7,916,976 $9,500,371 $11,400,445 $37,467,837 $813,960 $2,300,000 $6,497,200 $8,796,640 $10,555,968 $12,667,162 $41,630,930 C-53
Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Lake Boulevard 24" - Keswick to Masonic
Description: 24" Lake Boulevard - Oasis to Northpoint (9,090 feet) Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Lake Boulevard
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$434,599
$8,012,160
$8,446,759
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4286-19
Water Connection Fees $1,602,432 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,602,432 Water Rates $6,409,728 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,409,728
Total $8,012,160 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,012,160
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$8,012,160 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,012,160
$8,012,160 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,012,160
Well Rehabilitation
Description: Well 12 Rehabilition project
Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
W-4338-02
Water Rates $184,431 $211,660 $71,386 $215,586 $75,422 $219,734 $978,219 Total $184,431 $211,660 $71,386 $215,586 $75,422 $219,734 $978,219 Project Development $18,443 $97,822
Construction
Total
$21,166 $7,139 $21,559 $7,542 $21,973
$165,988 $190,494 $64,247 $194,027 $67,880 $197,761 $880,397 $184,431 $211,660 $71,386 $215,586 $75,422 $219,734 $978,219 Well Head Treatment System
Enterprise well water quality improvements. Study and implementation of sequestering agents distribution system flushing and loading to reduce iron, manganese and arsenic levels during the next five years. Other major well head treatment improvements postponed pending identification of funding.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Enterprise Wells
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$271,863
$7,726,347
$7,998,210
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4338-04
Water Rates $7,726,347 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,726,347
Total $7,726,347 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,726,347
Project Development $772,635 $772,635
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$6,953,712 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,953,712
$7,726,347 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,726,347
C-54
Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Install Oxidation/Filtration at EW-14
Description: Install oxidation/filtration treatment system to remove manganese.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
5550 Old Oregon Trail
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$4,035,690
$4,035,690
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4338-05
Water Rates $0 $0 $403,570 $3,632,120 $0 $0 $4,035,690
Total $0 $0 $403,570 $3,632,120 $0 $0 $4,035,690
Project Development $0 $403,570
Construction
Total
$0 $403,570 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,632,120 $0 $0 $3,632,120
$0 $0 $403,570 $3,632,120 $0 $0 $4,035,690
Foothill Water Treatment Plant Maintenance
Description: Upgrades at the Foothill Water Treatment Plant to accommodate growth and replace aging equipment.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
3100 Foothill Boulevard
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
W-4492-01
Water Rates $941,235 $4,780,000 $250,000 $258,540 $8,347,372 $8,356,506 $22,933,653 Total $941,235 $4,780,000 $250,000 $258,540 $8,347,372 $8,356,506 $22,933,653 Project Development $94,123 $2,293,365
Construction
Total
$478,000 $25,000 $25,854 $834,737 $835,651
$847,111 $4,302,000 $225,000 $232,686 $7,512,635 $7,520,855 $20,640,288 $941,235 $4,780,000 $250,000 $258,540 $8,347,372 $8,356,506 $22,933,653 Cypress Avenue Booster Pump Station
Construction of a 7 MGD pump station at the existing supervisory valve. This pump station will have the ability to pump in either direction between the Foothill and Enterprise pressure zones and greatly increase the flexibility of water delivery in the distribution system.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Cypress Avenue
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$488,850
$3,011,610
$3,500,460
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4600-02
Water Rates $3,011,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,011,610
Total $3,011,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,011,610
Project Development $301,161 $301,161
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,710,449 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,710,449
$3,011,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,011,610
C-55
Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Buckeye Water Treatment Plant Maintenance
Description: Various maintenance projects at the Buckeye Water Treatment Plant.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
11501 Benson Drive/3100 Foothill Boulevard
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
W-4606-01
Water Rates $984,100 $134,470 $139,064 $143,814 $148,727 $153,808 $1,703,983 Total $984,100 $134,470 $139,064 $143,814 $148,727 $153,808 $1,703,983 Project Development $98,410 $170,398
Construction
Total
$13,447 $13,906 $14,381 $14,873 $15,381
$885,690 $121,023 $125,157 $129,433 $133,854 $138,427 $1,533,584 $984,100 $134,470 $139,064 $143,814 $148,727 $153,808 $1,703,983 Hill 900 Reservoir
Description: Determine location and construct additional reservoir.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
West Side of Redding
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$6,205,150
$6,205,150
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-4795-03
Water Rates $205,150 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,205,150 Total $205,150 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,205,150 Project Development $205,150 $405,150
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $200,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000 $4,000,000 $5,800,000
$205,150 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $6,205,150
Reservoir Improvements
Description: Rehab/repair 1 MG Cascade tank and 3.5MG Enterprise tank.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
1987 Kenyon Drive
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Distribution System
W-4795-04-05
Water Rates $1,475,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $2,475,000 Total $1,475,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $2,475,000
Project Development $147,500 $247,500
Construction
Total
$0 $50,000 $0 $50,000 $0
$1,327,500 $0 $450,000 $0 $450,000 $0 $2,227,500
$1,475,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 $0 $2,475,000
C-56
Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Athens Area Water Main
Description: Replace 2", 6" and 8" water mains in the Athens Area with 8" PVC.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Athens Area
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$219,480
$5,000,000
$5,219,480
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23004
Water Rates $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
Total $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
$5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
Magnolia Area Improvements
Description: Replace water mains Magnolia Area
Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Magnolia Area
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$912,833
$867,750
$1,780,583
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23013
Water Rates $867,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $867,750
Total $867,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $867,750
Project Development $86,775 $86,775
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$780,975 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $780,975
$867,750 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $867,750
North Willis Area Water Line Replacement
Install approximately 15,000 linear feet of new 8” diameter PVC water main and over 2,000 linear feet of 12” diameter DIP water main.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
North Willis Area
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$255,280
$5,200,000
$5,455,280
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23016
Water Rates $200,000 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,200,000
Total $200,000 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,200,000
Project Development $200,000 $200,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
$200,000 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,200,000
C-57
Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Water Main Improvement 2023
Description: Install approximately 8,800 linear feet of 8" and 12" water mains at various locations througout the city.

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$230,373
$1,500,000
$1,730,373
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23018
Water Rates $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Total $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
$1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Cascade Racquet Club
Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Cascade Area
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$22,351
$861,700
$884,051
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23024
Water Rates $400,000 $461,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $861,700
Total $400,000 $461,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $861,700
Project Development $40,000 $86,170
Construction
Total
$46,170 $0 $0 $0 $0
$360,000 $415,530 $0 $0 $0 $0 $775,530
$400,000 $461,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $861,700
Country Oaks Water Main
Description: Replace water mains Country Oaks Area
Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Country Oaks Area
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$4,100,000
$4,100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23048
Water Rates $100,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,100,000
Total $100,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,100,000
Project Development $10,000 $410,000
Construction
Total
$400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$90,000 $3,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,690,000
$100,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,100,000
C-58
Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Hill 900 to Placer
Outlet from Hill 900 Reservoirs: Replace existing 12-inch with 2,400 linear feet (LF) of new 24-inch piping, realign from easements into streets.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Placer Street
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-01
Water Rates $0 $0 $270,000 $1,730,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Total $0 $0 $270,000 $1,730,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Project Development $0 $270,000
Construction
Total
$0 $270,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $1,730,000 $0 $0 $1,730,000
$0 $0 $270,000 $1,730,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Ranchettes 12" Water Main
Install approximately 4,100 LF of new 12-inch piping for a second supply and redundancy to the Ranchettes Area, at the southwest end of the Cascade Zone. Install the Clear Creek crossing during Westside Wastewater Interceptor construction, while the creek is bypassed.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Ranchettes Area
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-04
Water Rates $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Project Development $0 $150,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $1,350,000
$0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Buckeye Reservoir Booster Pump Station
Install a booster pump station and actuated valves at the existing 2 MG reservoir to regularly cycle water in the Buckeye 2 MG reservoir.

Description:

Location:
2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 Total
Buckeye
Proposed Funding: 2028-29
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-RS-07-01
Water Rates $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Total $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Project Development $0 $150,000
Construction
Total
$0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,350,000
$0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
C-59
Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Attachment A - CIP 2023-28 Final Draft (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Conduct a Public Hearing, and upon conclusion:
(1) Offer an Ordinance amending the following, all relating to clean-up and updating of the Zoning Code, for first reading by title only and waive the full reading:
(a) Section 7.12.160: Amend the type of permit required for dog kennels from a use permit to a site development permit to be consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, Title 18;
(b) Section 18.01.050: Correct a typo in the Base Zoning Districts table; (c) Section 18.15.040: Correct a typo in the required findings for zoning exceptions; (d) Section 18.26: Amend the Residential Density Bonus Chapter to comply with State law;
(e) Section 18.36.030: Add Golf Courses as a use allowed with a Use Permit in the “PF” Public Facilities Zoning District;
(f) Section 18.41.100: Reinsert standards requiring shade trees within parking lot areas which were inadvertently eliminated in a previous code clean up; (g) Sections 18.42.030: Reformat notes applicable to maximum sign area allowances. To further allow for larger temporary banners without a discretionary permit thereby increasing the size criteria from 24 square feet to 50 square feet; (h) Section 18.48.030: Correct the reference to the appropriate setback schedule for River/Creek Corridor Development Standards;
(2) Authorize the City Attorney to prepare and the City Clerk to publish the summary ordinance according to law; and
(3) Find the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration is adequate to comply with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact related to the proposed Redding Municipal Code amendments.

MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 6.2
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.2--Public Hearing to consider an Ordinance regarding Rezoning Application (RZ-2024-01015), by the City of Redding, for proposed amendments to the Redding Municipal Code.

Jeremy Pagan, Development
Services Director/Bldg
Official
Packet Pg. 504
Report to Redding City Council October 8, 2024
Re: 6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding Page 2 Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to adopt the ordinance as recommended by staff and provide staff direction to continue the public hearing at a future Council meeting.

Background/Analysis
Under consideration are minor “cleanup” amendments to the text of the Redding Zoning Code.

Similar minor text cleanup amendments are typically processed on an annual basis; the most recent amendments were adopted by the Council in April 2024. The proposed amendments are minor in nature and are primarily intended to clarify the intent of the existing regulations and comply with federal law.

On September 24, 2024, the Planning Commission recommended that the Council adopt the proposed amendments.

The proposed text amendments are summarized below:

Section 7.12.160: Amend the type of permit required for dog kennels from a use permit to a site development permit to be consistent with the Zoning Ordinance, Title 18; Section 18.01.050: Correct a typo in the Base Zoning Districts table; Section 18.15.040: Correct a typo in the required findings for zoning exceptions; Section 18.26: Amend the Residential Density Bonus Chapter to comply with state law; Section 18.36.030: Add Golf Courses as a use allowed with a Use Permit in the “PF” Public Facilities Zoning District;
Section 18.41.100: Reinsert standards requiring shade trees within parking lot areas which were inadvertently eliminated in a previous code clean up;
Sections 18.42.030: Reformat notes applicable to maximum sign area allowances. To further allow for larger temporary banners without a discretionary permit thereby increasing the size criteria from 24 square feet to 50 square feet; and
Section 18.48.030: Correct the reference to the appropriate setback schedule for River/Creek Corridor Development Standards.

Environmental Review
Staff has determined that the preparation of an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the Redding Zoning Code is appropriate under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for the proposed Redding Zoning Code amendments. The preparation of an addendum to a previously adopted environmental document is specifically provided for under CEQA to address minor technical changes to a previously approved project that do not alter the findings and determinations of the adopted environmental document.

Packet Pg. 505
Report to Redding City Council October 8, 2024
Re: 6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding Page 3 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Draft New Ordinance
^Draft Strikeout Ordinance
^Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration
Packet Pg. 506

DRAFT NEW ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 7
(ANIMALS), CHAPTER 7.12 (DOGS), BY AMENDING SECTION 7.12.160 (KENNEL LICENSE-APPROVAL OF BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE
REVIEW REQUIRED) AND AMENDING TITLE 18 (ZONING), CHAPTER

18.01 (TITLES, COMPONENTS, AND PURPOSES), BY AMENDING
SECTION 18.01.050 (APPLICABILITY OF LAND USE AND
DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 18.15 (ZONING
EXCEPTIONS), BY AMENDING SECTION 18.15.040 (REQUIRED
FINDINGS), CHAPTER 18.26 (RESIDENTIAL DENSITY BONUS, BY AMENDING SECTIONS 18.26.010 (PURPOSE), 18.26.020
(INCORPORATION OF STATE REGULATIONS), 18.26.030
(DEFINITIONS), 18.26.040 (ELIGIBILITY FOR DENSITY BONUS,

18.26.050 (APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS), 18.26.060 (DENSITY BONUS ALLOWANCE), 18.26.070 (INCENTIVES AND

WAIVER/MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS),

18.26.080 (CHILD CARE FACILITIES), 18.26.090 (DONATION OF LAND),

18.26.100 (GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA), 18.26.110
(REQUIRED FINDINGS), 18.26.120 (AFFORDABLE HOUSING
AGREEMENT REQUIRED), 18.26.130 (ADMINISTRATIVE FEE),

18.26.140 (VIOLATIONS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING COST
REQUIREMENTS), CHAPTER 18.36 (PUBLIC FACILITIES), BY
AMENDING SECTION 18.36.030 (LAND USE REGULATIONS),
CHAPTER 18.41 (OFF-STREET PARKING), BY AMENDING SECTION

18.41.100 (SCREENING AND LANDSCAPE); CHAPTER 18.42 (SIGNS), BY AMENDING SECTION 18.42.030 (GENERAL STANDARDS); CHAPTER

18.48 (RIVER/CREEK CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT), BY AMENDING
SECTION 18.48.030 (DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing pertaining to the attached amendments to Title 7, Animals, and Title 18, Zoning, on September 24, 2024, and recommended that the City Council adopt said amendments; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on October 15, 2024, prior to the first reading of this Ordinance;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Title 7 (Animals), Chapter 7.12 (Dogs), Section 17.12.160 (Kennel License-Approval of Board of Administrative Review Required) is hereby amended to read as follows:

7.12.160 Kennel License-Approval of Development Services Director required.

Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) A. Except as permitted by Title 18 of the Redding Municipal Code, it is unlawful for any person to maintain a kennel without obtaining a kennel license from the city. All permitted kennels are subject to business license requirements as set in Title 6 – Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations. No kennel license shall be issued without approval of a Site Development Permit by Director as prescribed in Chapter 18.13, Site Development Permits. The Director or his/her designee shall not issue such permit other than through the procedures as established in the Zoning Regulations of the City. The Director or his/her designee shall have the discretion to limit, condition or restrict any permit issued in any way the Director or his/her designee deems necessary under the circumstances with regard to location, neighborhood, noise, sanitation, proper planning and any other factor deemed relevant by the Director or his/her designee. Any such permit shall be revocable at any time by the Director or his/her designee at the discretion of the Director or his/her designee.

B. Any person owning, conducting, managing or operating any kennel within the city shall pay for the privilege of maintain or operating such kennel a license fee established by resolution of the City Council. The Site Development Permit by Director, together with satisfactory evidence of current rabies vaccinations, shall be presented to the city clerk prior to issuance of the kennel license.

C. Because of the need to adequately protect animals within kennels from unhealthy conditions and practices, and the interest of the public in preventing inhumane practices, reasonable inspections by the city shall be completed. As a condition of the issuance of a kennel license, each operator shall agree to allow such inspection. Such acknowledgment shall be made part of the application and file. Each kennel for which a kennel license has been issued shall be inspected at intervals determined by the city.

D. Any kennel which is found by the city to be unsanitary or a menace to animal or public health, safety or welfare is declared to be a public nuisance. In the event immediate action is necessary to preserve or protect animal or public health, safety or welfare, the city is authorized and empowered to summarily abate such nuisance by any reasonable means, including but not limited to, impoundment of the animal(s) or the immediate closure of the kennel, or both, for such time until the nuisance is abated.

Section 2. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.01 (Titles, Components, and Purposes), Section 18.01.050 (Applicability of Land Use and Development Regulations) is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.01.050 Applicability of Land Use and Development Regulations A. Establishment of Base Zoning Districts. Base zoning districts into which the city is divided are established as follows:

Residential Zoning Districts
"RL" Rural Lands
"RE" Residential Lands
"RS" Residential Single Family
"RM" Residential Multiple Housing Type
Office and Commercial Zoning Districts
Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) "LO" Limited Office
"GO" General Office
Office and Commercial Zoning Districts (cont.)
"NC" Neighborhood Commercial
"SC" Shopping Center
"RC" Regional Commercial
"GC" General Commercial
"HC" Heavy Commercial
Industrial Zoning Districts
"GI" General Industry
"HI" Heavy Industrial
Other Districts
"PF" Public Facility
"OS" Open Space
Section 3. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.15 (Zoning Exceptions), Section 18.15.040 (Required Findings) is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.15.040 Required Findings
The Director shall make the following findings when approving any zoning exception:

A. That the application for the adjustment is necessary due to special circumstances or conditions pertaining to the property or to the use thereon.

B. That the proposed adjustment is necessary in order that the owner may not be unreasonably deprived of the proper use or enjoyment of the owner's property.

C. That the proposed adjustment would not be detrimental to the neighborhood in which the property is located.

D. That the proposed adjustment is consistent with the General Plan and the zoning and development standards of this chapter that pertain to the subject property.

Section 4. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.26 (Residential Density) is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.26 Residential Density Bonus
Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Sections:

18.26.010 Purpose

18.26.020 Incorporation of State Regulation

18.26.030 Definitions

18.26.040 Eligibility for Density Bonus

18.26.050 Application Requirements

18.26.060 Density Bonus Allowance

18.26.070 Incentives and Waiver/Modification of Development Standards

18.26.080 General Development Criteria

18.26.090 Required Findings

18.26.100 Affordable Housing Agreement Required

18.26.110 Administrative Fee

18.26.120 Violation of Affordable Housing Cost Requirements

18.26.010 Purpose
The purpose of this chapter is to provide incentives, consistent with State law, for the construction of housing units that are affordable to very-low, low-, and moderate-income households. A density bonus is an increase over the otherwise maximum residential density allowable under the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan. It provides developers an opportunity to increase the number of units within a proposed residential development in exchange for including within the project a specified number of units that are affordable to very low-, low-, or moderate-income persons and families. The density bonus provides a private market incentive to encourage the development of affordable housing in Redding. State law also allows the City to provide incentives other than, or in addition to, an increase in density if requested by an applicant. Accordingly, the purposes of this chapter are to:

A. Establish procedures for allowing an increase in density above the maximum residential density allowed by the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.

B. Provide for flexibility in applying zoning regulations and development standards in order to facilitate the development of affordable housing.

C. Provide incentives to developers to encourage the inclusion of affordable housing within residential projects.

D. Implement the goals and policies of the General Plan relative to providing housing opportunities and meeting community housing needs.

18.26.020 Incorporation of State Regulations
The density bonus provisions of California Government Code (CGC) Sections 65915–65918 (State Density Bonus Law), as may be amended from time to time, are incorporated by reference into this chapter. In instances where the provisions of State Density Bonus Law are more restrictive than this chapter, the City reserves the right to review applications for a density bonus in accordance with the aforementioned CGC Sections. Pursuant to state law, the granting of a density bonus or the granting of a density bonus together with an incentive(s) (e.g. concessions, Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) waiver or modification of development standards) shall not be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a general plan amendment, specific plan amendment, or rezone.

18.26.030 Definitions
For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings and are in addition to the definitions contained in CGC 65915.

A. "Affordable Housing Agreement" is defined as a legally binding agreement between a developer and the City to ensure that the density bonus requirements of this Chapter are satisfied. The agreement establishes the number and type of affordable units, affordability tenure, and the terms and conditions of affordability.

B. "Density Bonus" is defined as an increase in density over the otherwise maximum allowable gross residential density under the applicable General Plan designation and/or zoning district as of the date of filing of a request for a density bonus with the City. If elected by the applicant, a density bonus also includes requests for a lesser percentage of density increase, including, but not limited to, no increase in density based on a request for approval only of development incentives or waiver/modification of development standards necessary to achieve project affordability for lower income individuals or families.

C. "Development Standard" is defined as the site, development, or construction standards and/or conditions of approval that apply to a residential development.

One or more incentives can be requested by the applicant in accordance with Section

18.26.070. The term "incentive" includes the term "concession" as that term is used in California Government Code Section 65915(k)(1).

E. "Waiver/Modification of Development Standards" is defined as eliminating or modifying a development standard that would have the effect of physically precluding the construction of a development at the density or with the incentive(s) permitted by this chapter.

18.26.040 Projects Eligible for a Density Bonus
A developer of a housing development may qualify for a density bonus and/or at least one other incentive as provided by this chapter and CGC Section 65915. Density bonuses may be granted in the following circumstances:

A. At least 5 percent of the units are restricted to very low-income households.

B. At least 10 percent of the units are restricted to low-income households.

C. At least 10 percent of the units in a for sale common interest development are restricted to moderate-income households, provided that all units in the development are offered to the public for purchase.

Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) D. One hundred percent of the housing units (other than the managers’ units) are restricted to very low, low, and moderate-income residents (with a maximum of 20 percent moderate units.)
E At least 10 percent of the housing units are for transitional foster youth, disabled veterans or homeless persons, with rents restricted at the very-low income level.

F. At least 20 percent of the units are for low income college students at housing dedicated for full-time students at accredited colleges.

G. The project donates at least one acre of land to the City for very-low income units, and the land has the appropriate general plan designation, zoning, permits and approvals, and access to public facilities needed for such housing.

H. The project is a senior housing development (no affordable units required.) I. The project is a mobile home park age-restricted to senior citizens (no affordable units required.)

18.26.050 Application Requirements
Each application for a density bonus and/or approval of incentives for the development of affordable housing units shall be accompanied by the following information, which is in addition to information required by an application for a building permit or discretionary permit required by the Zoning Code (i.e., site development permit, use permit, parcel map, tentative subdivision map).

If a project is exempt from a discretionary permit under Government Code Sections 65400 and 65582.1 (Senate Bill No. 35 approved by Governor September 29, 2017), a site development permit issued by the Director shall be required solely for the purpose of processing the density bonus request.

A. A site plan that includes the identification of all units in the project including the location and size of the affordable/bonus units.

B. A brief narrative describing the project including information on:

1. The number of units permitted under the General Plan and Zoning of the property.

2. The total number of units proposed in the project.

3. The number of affordable and/or senior units proposed and a breakdown of units proposed for very low-, low-, and moderate-income, senior citizen, and market rate units.

4. The number of bonus units, if any, requested.

5. A phasing plan (if applicable) that provides for the timely development of the affordable units proportionate to each proposed phase of development.

Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding)

6. Any requested incentive(s), concessions, or waiver/modification of development standards, including an explanation as to why the requested action is required for the development.

7. If a density bonus is requested for construction of a child-care facility pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(h), the application shall show the location and square footage of the proposed facility and provide evidence that the requirements of that Government Code Section have been met.

C. The specific financial information and data (i.e., pro forma) relied upon by the developer that establishes the monetary value of the incentives/waivers/modification of development standards requested by the developer and a concise statement of how such value was calculated. A clear statement of how the requested incentive(s) is necessary to make the proposed housing development economically feasible shall be provided. The information shall be sufficiently detailed to enable City staff to examine the conclusions reached by the developer.

1. Pro Forma Exceptions: Projects that are consistent with any of the items described in "a," "b," and/or “c” below are exempt from the requirement to provide a pro forma unless the Director determines that the nature of the proposed development warrants submittal of financial information sufficient to demonstrate that the requested incentives are required for the economic viability of providing affordable units in the project:
a. Projects with market rate units totaling 25 percent or less of proposed total residential units.
b. Projects that request deviations from a standard that does not exceed 25 percent of the following base zoning district requirements in recognition by the City that they may result in actual and financially sufficient cost reductions:
i. Yard setbacks, except where a skyplane or multistory setback is required.
ii. Lot coverage.
iii. Lot area, width, or depth.
iv. Distance between structures (shall not conflict with the Building Code).
v. Off-street parking reductions requested by the applicant that comply with the State Density Bonus Law and Section 18.26.070B.6. c. Financial participation in the project by the City.

D. Other pertinent information as the Director may require enabling the City to adequately analyze the economic feasibility of the proposed development with respect to the requested Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) incentives. The City may, at its sole discretion, retain a consultant to review the financial information. The cost of the consultant review shall be borne by the applicant.

E. The applicant notification and processing timelines of CGC Section 65915 shall apply.

18.26.060 Density Bonus Allowance
Density Bonus Allowance. Allowances shall be in accordance with CGC Section 65915 and any additional allowances provided by this chapter. subject to the City’s application and processing requirements contained in Section 18.26.050. A development that satisfies all pertinent provisions of this chapter shall be allowed the following applicable density bonuses of CGC Section 65915 by right, subject to the City’s application and processing requirements contained in Section

18.26.050. At the City’s sole discretion, and consistent with state law, nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the City from granting a density bonus greater than afforded by CGC 65915 or from granting a proportionately lower density bonus for developments that do not meet the requirements of this chapter. In calculating the number of units required for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households, the density bonus units shall not be included as illustrated in the following example.

18.26.070 Incentives and Waiver/Modification of Development Standards A. Eligibility for Incentives. Incentives are available to a housing developer as specified in CGC Section 65915. At its sole discretion, the City may grant incentives that exceed CGC Section 65915 requirements, including providing incentives in cases where bonus units are not being requested in order to facilitate development of affordable housing units.

B. Available Incentives. Incentives may include, but are not limited to:

1. A reduction in site development standards, such as:
a. Reduced minimum lot sizes and/or dimensions.
b. Reduced minimum building setbacks.
c. Reduced minimum common outdoor and/or private outdoor living area. d. Increased maximum lot coverage.
e. Increased maximum building height.
f. Reduced on-site parking requirements.

Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding)

2. A density bonus greater than the minimum required by CGC Section 65915.

3. Other regulatory incentives proposed by the developer or the City that result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions.

4. Approval of mixed-use zoning in conjunction with the housing development if:
(1) commercial, office, industrial, or other land uses will reduce the cost of the housing development; and (2) the commercial, office, industrial, or other land uses are compatible with the housing development and the existing or planned future development in the area where the proposed project will be located.

C. Waiver/Modification of Development Standards. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(e)(1), an applicant may request a waiver or reduction of a development standard that would otherwise physically preclude the construction of a development at the density or with the incentive(s) permitted by this chapter. Such standards, include, but are not necessarily limited to, those described in Section B (Available Incentives) above.

18.26.080 General Development Criteria
The following criteria shall apply to housing development projects that have received bonus density units in accordance with this chapter:

A. Affordable housing units shall be constructed concurrently with or prior to non-restricted units unless the City and applicant agree—within the required Affordable Housing Agreement (refer to Section 18.26.110)—to an alternate schedule of development.

B. Affordable housing units should be dispersed throughout the project site, whenever reasonably possible.

C. Affordable housing units should have the same bedroom mix as market rate units in the same development, except that the project sponsor may include a higher number of bedrooms in the affordable dwelling units.

D. The exterior design and appearance of the affordable dwelling units shall be visually indistinguishable from market rate units in the development in terms of overall design and use of materials.

18.26.090 Required Findings
The following findings shall be made prior to approving applications for a density bonus and requests for incentives, as provided in this chapter.

A. Density Bonus Approval (additional units only, no incentives requested).

Finding:

1. The density bonus request meets the requirements of this chapter.

Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) B. Density Bonus Approval with Incentive(s) or Waiver/Modification of Development Standards.

Findings:

1. The density bonus request meets the requirements of this chapter.

2. The incentive is required in order to provide affordable housing.

3. Approval of the incentive(s) will have no specific adverse impacts upon health, safety, or the physical environment or on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources and for which there is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact without rendering the development unaffordable to very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Specific adverse impact means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.

4. Approval of the incentives is not contrary to state or federal law.

18.26.100 Affordable Housing Agreement Required
A. Form and Content of Agreement. The applicant shall submit an Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) for City review. The form of the AHA will vary, depending on the manner in which the provisions of this chapter are satisfied for a particular development.

For example, an affordable housing development may utilize public funding sources that require long-term affordability, monitoring, and reporting consistent with this chapter. In such cases, the requirements of such program may be sufficient, and an AHA may not be required. The form and content of the AHA (or equivalent document) shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. The AHA shall be recorded as a restriction on the parcel or parcels on which the affordable housing units will be constructed. The approval and recordation of the AHA shall take place prior to any final map being recorded or, where a map is not being processed, prior to issuance of a building permit(s) for such parcel or units. The AHA shall be binding on all future owners and successors in interest.

An AHA must include, at a minimum, the following:

B. Continued Affordability. The AHA shall include the procedures and mechanisms proposed by the developer to maintain the continued affordability of all affordable housing units, whether rental or ownership units. An applicant shall agree to, and the City shall ensure, continued affordability of all very low-and low-income units that qualified the applicant for the award of the density bonus for 55 years, or a longer period of time if required by the construction or mortgage-financing assistance program, mortgageinsurance program, or rental-subsidy program. Rents for very-low and low-income units shall be set at an affordable rent as defined in CGC Section 65015. Owner-occupied units shall be available at an affordable housing cost as defined in CGC Section 65015.

Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding)

18.26.110 Administrative Fee
An administrative fee may be established by the City Council for City review of all materials submitted in accordance with this chapter and for ongoing enforcement of its provisions.

18.26.120 Violation of Affordable Housing Cost Requirements In the event it is determined that rents in excess of those allowed by operation of this chapter have been charged to a tenant residing in an affordable rental unit, the City may take the appropriate legal action to recover, and the rental unit owner shall be obligated to pay to the tenant (or to the City in the event the tenant cannot be located), any excess rent charges. In the event it is determined that a sales price in excess of that allowed by operation of this chapter has been charged to an income-eligible household purchasing an affordable ownership unit, the City may take the appropriate legal action to recover, and the affordable residential unit seller shall be obligated to pay to the purchaser (or to the City in the event the purchaser cannot be located), any sales proceeds determined to be in excess of the affordable price.

Section 5. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.36 (“PF” Public Facilities), Section 18.36.030 (Land Use Regulations) is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.36.030 Land Use Regulations
Schedule 18.36.030-A below prescribes the land use regulations for the "Public Facilities" District.

The regulations for this district are established by letter designation as follows:
"P" designates permitted use classifications.
"S" designates use classifications that are permitted after review and approval of a site development permit by the Board of Administrative Review. "U" designates use classifications that are permitted after review and approval of a use permit by the Planning Commission.

Use classifications are defined in Chapter 18.60, Use Classifications. In cases where a specific land use or activity is not defined, the Director shall assign the land use or activity to a classification that is substantially similar in character. Use classifications not listed or not substantially similar to the uses in the schedule below as determined by the Director are prohibited.

Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Schedule 18.36.030-A Land Use Regulations
Use Classifications "PF" Additional
Regulations
Public and Semi-Public Uses
Cemetery U
Clubs and Lodges S 1
Colleges and Trade Schools, Public or Private S 1
Commercial Support Services S 1
Community Social Service Facilities U
Cultural Institutions S 1
Day Care Center (14 or more) S 1
Golf Courses, Public or Private U
Government Offices S 1
Hospitals and Clinics (including emergency care) S 1
Offices of Philanthropic/Nonprofit Organizations S 1
Park & Recreation Facilities S 1
Parking, Public S 1
Public Maintenance and Service Facilities U
Public Safety Facilities S 1
Religious Facilities S 1
Residential, Public and Not for Profit S 1
Residential Care, General S 1
Residential Care, Senior S 1
Schools, Public or Private S 1
Supportive Housing Facilities S 1
Transitional Housing Facilities S 1
Transportation, Communication, and Utilities Uses
Airports and Heliports U
Communication Antennae and Transmission Towers U
Transportation Passenger Terminals U
Utilities, Major U
Utilities, Minor P
Residential Uses
Residential Cannabis Cultivation L19 P See Chapter 6.12 Commercial Uses
Commercial Cannabis Cultivation -- Not permitted
Retail Cannabis Sales -- Not permitted
Industrial Uses
Cannabis Microbusinesses, Distribution, Manufacturing, Processing, Testing, and Storage
-- Not permitted
Agriculture and Extractive Uses
Goat Grazing for fire fuel management Sd Sd
Accessory Uses and Structures See Section 18.43.020
Notes:

L19 Indoor cannabis cultivation permitted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter

6.12, Cannabis Activity.
1 Use permit required if facility exceeds 30,000 square feet or 50 dwelling units.

Section 6. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.41 (Off-Street Parking), Section 18.41.100 (Screening and Landscape) is hereby amended to read as follows:

Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding)

18.41.100 Screening and Landscape
A. Fencing. In order to reduce or eliminate headlight glare and loss of privacy, newly constructed outdoor off-street parking areas that cause vehicle headlights to be cast upon a neighboring residential window or a vacant lot in a residential district shall be screened with a masonry wall or a solid wooden fence not less than 4 feet in height. Said screening shall be maintained in good condition at all times, shall be kept free at all times of advertising signs, and shall be set back from any abutting public street a distance equal to the distance which such parking area must be set back from any abutting public street.

No wall shall be required where there exists a wall that complies with the requirements of this paragraph, either on the common property line or adjacent thereto, on either side of the common property line, provided, however, that if such wall is thereafter removed, a replacement wall shall be required forthwith from the owner of the parking facility.

Where a wood fence is substituted for a solid masonry wall, such fence shall be constructed so that the boards overlap or are otherwise designed such that a person cannot see through them as a result of subsequent shrinkage. The fence shall have fence posts of either wood treated to resist rot and termites or of iron, steel, or masonry; and in all cases, fence posts must be set in concrete. Under no circumstances shall walls, fences, or shrubbery be placed or maintained on the property in such a manner as to interfere with visibility so as to endanger safe ingress and egress. As an alternative to a fence, an earth berm, or earth berm and wall, can be substituted for the required fence.

B. Street-Side Planter. The required front and corner side-yard setbacks shall be landscaped.

Notwithstanding the setback requirements established by this ordinance, where a parking lot abuts a 2-lane public street, it shall be separated therefrom by a planter not less than ten (10) feet in width. Where a parking lot abuts a 4-lane-or-more public street or a street designated on the General Plan as a 4-lane-or-more arterial street, it shall be separated therefrom by a planter not less than 15 feet in width. In commercial districts, landscaped setbacks from
non-access State highways shall average no less than twenty (20) feet (15 feet minimum).

Planter-width requirements are as measured from the property line. Planter-width minimums can be met using variable widths and may encroach into setback areas provided that the average width meets the minimum-width requirements as determined by the Development Services Director. If the sidewalk on the street is not adjacent to the property line, the area between the back of the sidewalk and the property line shall also be landscaped in addition to the above requirements. Public sidewalks may be located within the on-site landscape areas. Wherever the Zoning Code or more restrictive requirement of the City requires a greater-width planter than the above minimum, the greater requirement shall prevail.

The landscape planter between the parking facility and the street shall include shrubs that will attain a minimum height of three (3) feet above parking lot grade within eighteen (18) months of installation. The plant materials and spacing shall be adequate to effectively screen the parking facility from the street. City-approved street trees shall be planted within the street-side planter on thirty (30) foot centers or in groupings approved by the Development Services Director.

Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) As an alternative to plants alone, the following other techniques may be used:

1. Grass-covered berm a minimum of three (3) feet in height with a slope not steeper than 3:1. A three (3) foot-high, open decorative fence in combination with climbing and nonclimbing plants.

3. A three (3) foot-high, minimum four (4) inch-thick, decorative solid masonry or concrete wall at the back of the planter with a ground cover and/or other plants between the wall and the street.

4. Vegetation or screening of any type
shall not exceed two (2) feet in height
within areas where adequate vehicle
sight distance would otherwise be
obstructed. Where such screening is
adjacent to a street corner or
driveway intersection, screening
shall not exceed two (2) feet in height
in the triangle formed by the corner
and points at the curb thirty (30) feet
from the intersection or similar
corner points within twenty (20) feet
of a driveway intersection.

C. Shade Trees. Shade trees shall be planted in the parking lot at a ratio of one tree for every four (4) spaces. Trees shall be dispersed on a generally equal basis throughout the parking lot to maximize the shading effect on the parking stalls. The landscape planter providing for any required tree shall have a minimum area of seventy-two (72) square feet and a minimum width of six (6) feet. To qualify as parking lot shade trees, the tree must be of a species and variety with an ultimate height and canopy that will provide a shading effect, and the trees must be within seven-and-one-half (7.5) feet of a parking space or driveway aisle and must not be located within the public right-of-way. A parking space shall not be more than fifty (50) feet from a shade tree. The planting plans shall be submitted with the building permit application and shall illustrate how the trees are to be irrigated and protected. The minimum size of each tree to be planted shall be a fifteen (15) gallon size.

In those instances where parking is proposed underground or within a building, the tree to parking space ratio shall be 1:10. Said trees shall be planted within street-frontage planters or within other landscaped areas in the development.

D. Parking Lot Interior Landscape. The interior of all parking lots is to be landscaped at a ratio of sixty (60) square feet of landscape for each required parking space. For each additional space provided that exceeds the minimum parking requirement by more than five (5) spaces, or ten percent (10%), whichever is greater, eighty (80) square feet of landscape shall be provided for each excess space. The total required interior landscape area shall be evenly distributed throughout the parking areas. This requirement does not apply to parking lots that are underground or within buildings. Landscape areas that may be applied towards the required parking lot interior landscape area must have a minimum dimension of four (4) feet, be surrounded by or within seven-and-one-half (7.5) feet of a parking space or the aisle or pedestrian walkway serving it, or be within the required Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) streetside landscape area adjacent to a parking space or aisle serving it. Landscape within a public right-of-way or in excess of the required streetside landscape addressed in Subsection B does not count toward meeting the minimum requirement. No more than twelve (12) parking spaces may be constructed in a row without separating the spaces with a landscape planter a minimum of eight (8) feet in width. Rows of parking spaces shall be separated from adjoining driveways with landscape end islands or peninsulas that are a minimum width of eight (8) feet. When calculating landscape area or width minimums, the area of the protective curbing shall not be included.

E. Pavement Edge and Planter Protection. Landscaped areas and pavement edges in all multiple-family, commercial, and industrial zones shall be protected from damage and deterioration by the placement of six (6) inch-high, securely anchored, continuous concrete curbs or equivalent materials which have a minimum width of six (6) inches.

F. Building Separators. Excepting single-family residences and second dwelling units, parking spaces directly abutting a building are prohibited. Parking areas shall be separated from a building by a raised walkway or landscape at least four (4) feet in width.

Section 7. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.42 (Signs), Section 18.42.030 (General Standards) is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.42.030 General Standards
A. Maximum Sign Area for Each Lot. Except in the "RL," "RE," "RS," "RM," and "PF" Districts, the maximum sign area for each lot shall be based on the scaled relationship between the lot's street frontage and area in accordance with the sign-area limitations of the lot's zoning district as established in Schedule 18.42.030-A. The most restrictive of the lot's frontage and area shall determine the maximum sign area for the entire lot. The mathematical expressions for determining this area shall be as follows: starting with a street frontage of fifty (50) feet and area of six-thousand-five-hundred (6,500) square feet, for each twenty (20) feet of additional street frontage (on the same street) together with each two-thousand (2,000) square feet of lot area, additional increments of sign area according to the zoning districts noted in the schedule shall be permitted to face any one adjacent street in any one direction provided that no sign or cluster of signs on the lot shall exceed the maximum sign area for any one sign as set forth in Schedule 18.42.030-B of this section. The incremental sign-area increases are uniform except for the "LO" and "GO" districts, where the increase ceases at a maximum sign area of two-hundred (200) square-feet for a lot with a frontage of six hundred and ten (610) feet or an area of sixtytwo-thousand-six-hundred (62,600) square feet; thereafter, regardless of the frontage and lot area, the maximum sign area shall be two-hundred (200) square feet. Ten percent (10%) of the allowable sign area per lot shall be reserved for temporary promotional advertising including banners and window-painted signs. Maximum sign area allowed in the residential and public facilities districts noted above shall be based on the allowable sign type/size as indicated in Schedule 18.42.030-B. The allowable type and size shall be established by administrative sign permit or, in the case of new development, by the site development permit or use permit required by Chapter 18.36.

1. "Street Frontage" does not include streets or State highways from which the property cannot take legal access. This includes Interstate 5 and its on-/off-ramps; Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) State Routes 299, 44, and 273; and local streets where access rights have been waived.

2. Multiple parcel shopping center and similar developments shall be considered a single parcel for the purpose of determining the maximum allowable sign area.

3. If the lot does not have street frontage, then the lot-area column of Schedule

18.42.030-A shall be used to determine the maximum sign area per lot.

Increments of Additional Sign Area According to Zoning
(See Schedule 18.42.040-A)
District Additional Sign Area Increment
LO 3 square feet
GO 5 square feet
NC and GI 5 square feet
HI and HC 15 square feet
SC, RC, and GC 20 square feet
Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Schedule 18.42.030-A Maximum Total Sign Area Per Lot Based on Lot Area and Street Frontage
Maximum Total Sign Area Per Lot Based on Lot Area and Street Frontage Area Determinants Zoning Districts/Maximum Sign Area (ft2) Street Frontage
(ft)
Lot Area
(ft2) LO GO NC
HC
GI
HI
SC
RC
GC
50 6,500 30 60 90 125 175
70 8,500 33 65 95 140 195
90 10,500 36 70 100 155 215
110 12,500 39 75 105 170 235
130 14,500 43 80 110 185 255
150 16,500 45 85 115 200 275
170 18,500 48 90 120 215 295
190 20,500 51 95 125 230 315
210 22,500 54 100 130 245 335
230 24,500 57 105 135 260 355
250 26,500 60 110 140 275 375
270 28,500 63 115 145 290 395
290 30,500 66 120 150 305 415
310 32,500 69 125 155 320 435
330 64,500 72 130 160 335 455
350 36,500 75 135 165 350 475
370 38,500 78 140 170 365 495
390 40,500 81 145 175 380 515
410 42,500 84 150 180 395 535
430 44,500 87 155 185 410 555
450 46,500 90 160 190 425 575
470 48,500 93 165 195 440 595
490 50,500 96 170 200 455 615
510 52,500 99 175 205 470 635
530 54,500 102 180 210 485 655
550 56,500 105 185 215 500 675
570 58,500 108 190 220 515 695
590 60,500 111 195 225 530 715
610 62,500 114 200 230 545 735
630 64,500 117 200 235 560 755
650 66,500 120 200 240 575 775
670 68,500 123 200 245 590 795
690 70,500 126 200 250 605 815
710 72,500 129 200 255 620 835
730 74,500 132 200 260 635 855
750 76,500 135 200 265 650 875
770 78,500 138 200 270 665 895
790 80,500 141 200 275 680 915
810 82,500 144 200 280 695 935
830 84,500 147 200 285 710 955
850 86,500 150 200 290 725 975
Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Area Determinants Zoning Districts/Maximum Sign Area (ft2) Street Frontage
(ft)
Lot Area
(ft2) LO GO NC
HC
GI
HI
SC
RC
GC
870 88,500 153 200 295 740 995
890 90,500 156 200 300 755 1,015
910 92,500 159 200 305 770 1,035
930 94,500 162 200 310 785 1,055
950 96,500 165 200 315 800 1,075
970 98,500 168 200 320 815 1,095
990 100,500 171 200 325 830 1,115
1,010 102,500 174 200 330 845 1,135
1,030 104,500 177 200 335 860 1,155
1,050 106,500 180 200 340 875 1,175
1,070 108,500 183 200 345 890 1,195
1,090 110,500 186 200 350 905 1,215
1,110 112,500 189 200 355 920 1,235
1,130 114,500 192 200 360 935 1,255
1,150 116,500 195 200 365 950 1,275
1,170 118,500 198 200 370 965 1,295
1,190 120,500 200 200 375 980 1,315
1,210 122,500 200 200 380 995 1,335
1,230 124,500 200 200 385 1,010 1,355
1,250 126,500 200 200 390 1,025 1,375
1,270 128,500 200 200 395 1,040 1,395
B. Maximum Sign Area and Illumination for Each Type of Sign by Zoning District.

The maximum sign area, per sign, for each type of sign shall be based upon Schedule

18.42.030-B. This schedule indicates whether or not a permit is required by letters "P," meaning an administrative sign permit is not required, and "ASP," meaning approval of an administrative sign permit is required. Refer to the following sections for regulations on each type of sign:

1. Definitions — Chapter 18.61;

2. Maximum number of pole, monument, and shopping center identifier signs per lot — Subsection E of this chapter;

3. Standards for certain types of signs — Section 18.42.040 of this chapter;

4. General sign construction standards — Section 18.42.060 of this chapter.

Note: The maximum area for each sign type in the "PF" District shall be determined by administrative sign permit or, in the case of new development, by the site development permit or use permit required of the proposed development.

Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Schedule 18.42.030-B: Maximum Sign Area and Illumination for Each Type of Sign by Zoning District
Sign Type
"RL"
"RE"
"RS"
"RM" "LO" "GO" "NC" "SC"
"RC"
"GC"
"HC"
“CBD-SP”
“UBD-SP”
SGD-SP”
"GI"
"HI"

P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP
Detached
Monument – / 32 1 32/– 20/– 32/– 35/90 2 35/150 2 35/90 2 35/90 2 Public and
semipublic signs 35/90 3 35/90 3 35/90 3 35/90 35/90 35/90 35/90 – Pole – – – – 60/90 90/150 90/150 90/125
Shopping Center
identifier – – – – – –/2004 –/2004 –
Accessory sign – – 6/– 6/– 6/20 6/20 6/20 6/–
Signs on Buildings or Canopies
Mural
(non-advertising) – – – – –
300/301 or
greater
300/301 or
greater –
Super graphic – – – – – 200/400 200/400 –
Canopy, attached or
freestanding
(including gas station
canopies)
– – 20/– 30/– 30/– 35/– 35/– 35/–
Wall signs 12/24 1 20/40 20/40 25/50 75/– 200/250 5 150/200 5 150/200 5 Projecting – – – – 20/– 30/– 30/– –
Roof or Mansard
mounted – – – – 60/– 60/90 60/90 –
Marquee – – – – – 60/125 60/125 –
Public and
semipublic signs 12/243 12/24 12/24 12/30 60/75 60/90 60/90 60/90– Off-Site Signs See Sec. 18.42.080(H)
Animated Signs
Time and
temperature – – – 20/– 20/– 30/60 30/60 –
Rotating – – – – – –/90 –/90 –
Alternating flashers – – – – – – – –
Temporary Promotional Signs
Banners (vinyl or
canvas) – – – 12/– 12/–
50/51 or
greater 6
50/51 or
greater 6
50/51 or
greater 6
Off-site signs and
displays for public
service promotions
12/32 12/32 12/32 12–/32 12/32
Off-site real estate
signs –/32 –/32 –
On-site real estate
signs and
construction signs
See Section

18.42.040(
O)
See Section

18.42.040(
O)
32/– 32/– 32/– 32/– 32/– 32/–
Balloons and
dirigibles – – – – –
See Sec.

18.42.040(B)
See Sec.

18.42.040(B) –
Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Sign Type
"RL"
"RE"
"RS"
"RM" "LO" "GO" "NC" "SC"
"RC"
"GC"
"HC"
“CBD-SP”
“UBD-SP”
SGD-SP”
"GI"
"HI"

P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP
Beacons and
searchlights – – – – – P P –
Political Signs 12/– 12/– 12/– 32/– 32/– 32/– 32/– 32/– Window-painted
signs – – –
100 up to
10% of
total sign
area/200
or 30%
75 up to
10% of
total sign
area /200
or 30%
100 up to
10% of
total sign
area /200
or 30%
100 up to
10% of
total sign
area /200
or 30%
100 up to
10% of
total sign
area /200
or 30%
Notes:
1 For religious, general and senior residential care, and commercial recreation facilities only. (If illuminated, signs may be externally illuminated only.)
2 A monument sign up to ninety (90) square feet may be erected in lieu of a pole sign subject to meeting the requirements of Section 18.42.040(E). Monument signs exceeding ninety square feet require approval of a site development permit.
3 An administrative sign permit is required if the sign was not approved in conjunction with tentative map or planned development approval.
4 A use permit is required for a shopping center identifier sign. 5 Cumulative wall signage on any one wall shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the wall area on which the signs are located.
6 Maximum sign area for temporary banners associated with an administrative sign permit will be limited to the maximum sign area allowed in that zoning district.

Section 8. Title 18 (Zoning), Chapter 18.48 (River/Creek Corridor Development), Section 18.48.030 (Development Standards) is hereby amended to read as follows:

18.48.030 Development Standards
The following requirements pertain to all new developments along the waterways identified in Schedule 18.48.020-A, except as specifically provided in Sections 18.48.020 and 18.48.040.

A. Setbacks, easements, or in-fee dedications are required for the stream corridor and buffer areas as follows:

1. Ministerial projects (building permit; zoning clearance): development setbacks only. At the request of the property owner, the City may accept an offer of dedication and accept fee title to the buffer area.

2. Discretionary land use entitlements (site development permits; use permits):
dedicated to the City as an open-space easement.

3. Subdivision maps: dedicated to the City as an open-space easement or dedicated "in fee" to the City.

Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) B. The average buffer widths depicted in Schedule 18.20.020-A may be increased by the approving authority if necessary to protect environmental resources as determined through the project environmental impact determination process.

C. Where Chapter 18.51, "FP" Floodplain Overlay District, requires greater setbacks or dedications than shown in Schedule 18.48.020-A, the greater setbacks or dedications shall prevail.

D. No structure, parking access, parking space, paved area, fence, swimming pool, structure, or other improvements shall be constructed within a buffer area except the installation of approved public facility infrastructure.

E. It is intended that buffer areas be maintained in a natural state and not be landscaped.

Removal of vegetation as may be required by the Fire Marshal or by authorized public improvements is acceptable subject to review of environmental impacts and identification of any necessary mitigation measures.

F. Where constructed drainage devices and improvements are required, they shall be placed in the least visible locations and naturalized through the use of river rock, earth-tone concrete and/or native plant materials.

Section 9. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of the ordinance. The City Council of the City of Redding hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that one or more sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases may be held invalid or unconstitutional.

Section 10. The passage of this ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act, and therefore is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Section 11. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption thereof and cause its publication according to law.

Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 15th day of October, 2024, and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the _____ day of ________, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________
TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
________________________________ ____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 528 Attachment: ^Draft New Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding)

STRIKEOUT ORDINANCE
OLD LANGUAGE: STRUCK OUT
NEW LANGUAGE: UNDERLINE
REORGANIZED SECTION: DOUBLE UNDERLINE/STRIKEOUT
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 7
(ANIMALS), CHAPTER 7.12 (DOGS), BY AMENDING SECTION 7.12.160 (KENNEL LICENSE-APPROVAL OF BOARD OF ADMINISTRATIVE
REVIEW REQUIRED) AND AMENDING TITLE 18 (ZONING), CHAPTER

18.26.050 (APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS), 18.26.060 (DENSITY BONUS ALLOWANCE), 18.26.070 (INCENTIVES AND

WAIVER/MODIFICATION OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS),

18.26.080 (CHILD CARE FACILITIES), 18.26.090 (DONATION OF LAND),

18.26.100 (GENERAL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA), 18.26.110
(REQUIRED FINDINGS), 18.26.120 (AFFORDABLE HOUSING
AGREEMENT REQUIRED), 18.26.130 (ADMINISTRATIVE FEE),

18.41.100 (SCREENING AND LANDSCAPE); CHAPTER 18.42 (SIGNS), BY AMENDING SECTION 18.42.030 (GENERAL STANDARDS); CHAPTER

18.48 (RIVER/CREEK CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT), BY AMENDING
SECTION 18.48.030 (DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS)

7.12.160 Kennel License-Approval of board of administrative review Development Services Director required.

A. Except as permitted by Title 18 of the Redding Municipal Code, it is unlawful for any person to maintain a kennel without obtaining a kennel license from the city. All permitted kennels are subject to business license requirements as set in Title 6 – Business Taxes, Licenses and Regulations. No kennel license shall be issued without approval of a use permit Site Development Permit by Director as prescribed in Chapter 18.13, Site Development Permits approved by the board of administrative review. The board of administrative review Director or his/her designee shall not issue such permit other than through the procedures as established in the zoning regulations Zoning Regulations of the city City. The board of administrative review Director or his/her designee shall have the discretion to limit, condition Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) or restrict any permit issued in any way the board Director or his/her designee deems necessary under the circumstances with regard to location, neighborhood, noise, sanitation, proper planning and any other factor deemed relevant by the board Director or his/her designee. Any such permit shall be revocable at any time by the board of administrative review Director or his/her designee at the discretion of the board Director or his/her designee.

B. Any person owning, conducting, managing or operating any kennel within the city shall pay for the privilege of maintain or operating such kennel a license fee established by resolution of the city council City Council. The use permit Site Development Permit by Director, together with satisfactory evidence of current rabies vaccinations, shall be presented to the city clerk prior to issuance of the kennel license.

18.01.050 Applicability of Land Use and Development Regulations A. Establishment of Base Zoning Districts. Base zoning districts into which the city is divided are established as follows:

Residential Zoning Districts
"RL" Rural Lands
"RE" Residential Lands
"RS" Residential Single Family
"RM" Residential Mixed Multiple Housing
Type
Office and Commercial Zoning Districts
"LO" Limited Office
"GO" General Office
Packet Pg. 530 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Office and Commercial Zoning Districts
(cont.)
"NC" Neighborhood Commercial
"SC" Shopping Center
"RC" Regional Commercial
"GC" General Commercial
"HC" Heavy Commercial
Industrial Zoning Districts
"GI" General Industry
"HI" Heavy Industrial
Other Districts
"PF" Public Facility
"OS" Open Space

18.15.040 Required Findings
The Director shall make the following findings when approving any zoning exception:

A. That the application for the adjustment is necessary due to special circumstances or conditions pertaining to the property or to the use thereon.

B. That the proposed adjustment is necessary in order that the owner may not be unreasonably deprived of the proper use or enjoyment of the owner's property.

C. That the proposed adjustment would not be detrimental to the neighborhood in which the property is located.

D. That the proposed adjustment is consistent with the General Plan and the zoning and development standards of this chapter that pertain to the subject property.

18.26 Residential Density Bonus
Sections:

18.26.010 Purpose

18.26.020 Incorporation of State Regulation

18.26.030 Definitions

18.26.040 Eligibility for Density Bonus

18.26.050 Application Requirements

18.26.060 Density Bonus Allowance

18.26.070 Incentives and Waiver/Modification of Development Standards

18.26.080 Child Care Facilities

18.26.090 Donation of Land
Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding)

18.26.100080 General Development Criteria

18.26.110090 Required Findings

18.26.120100 Affordable Housing Agreement Required

18.26.130110 Administrative Fee

18.26.140120 Violation of Affordable Housing Cost Requirements

1.A. Establish procedures for allowing an increase in density above the maximum residential density allowed by the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance.

2.B. Provide for flexibility in applying zoning regulations and development standards in order to facilitate the development of affordable housing.

3.C. Provide incentives to developers to encourage the inclusion of affordable housing within residential projects.

4.D. Implement the goals and policies of the General Plan relative to providing housing opportunities and meeting community housing needs.

Pursuant to state law, the granting of a density bonus or the granting of a density bonus together with an incentive(s) (e.g. concessions, waiver or modification of development standards) shall not be interpreted, in and of itself, to require a general plan amendment, specific plan amendment, or rezone.

18.26.030 Definitions
For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall have the following meanings: and are in addition to the definitions contained in CGC 65915.

A. "Affordable Housing Agreement" is defined as a legally binding agreement between a Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) developer and the City to ensure that the density bonus requirements of this Chapter are satisfied. The agreement establishes the number and type of affordable units, affordability tenure, and the terms and conditions of affordability.
"Affordable Housing Unit" is defined as a housing unit, whether for rent or purchase, that is reserved under the terms of this chapter for very low-, low-, or moderate-income individuals or families as defined in this section and whose total housing costs will be at an affordable rent or sales price as determined using the methodology contained in California Code of Regulations (25 CCR Sections 6918 and 6920, respectively). Total housing costs for rentals generally include rent, utilities, and any fees and service charges levied by the landlord. Total housing costs for ownership units include, but are not limited to, principal, interest, property taxes, insurance, utilities, homeowner association fees, and an allowance for maintenance costs. "Child Care Facility" is defined as a child day-care facility other than a family day-care home, including, but not limited to, infant centers, preschools, extended day-care facilities, and schoolage child care centers.

B. "Density Bonus" is defined as an increase in density over the otherwise maximum allowable gross residential density under the applicable General Plan designation and and/or zoning district as of the date of filing of a request for a density bonus with the City. If elected by the applicant, a density bonus also includes requests for a lesser percentage of density increase, including, but not limited to, no increase in density based on a request for approval only of development incentives or waiver/modification of development standards necessary to achieve project affordability for lower income individuals or families.

C. "Development Standard" is defined as the site, development, or construction standards and/or conditions of approval that apply to a residential development.

D. "Incentive" is defined as a reduction in any site development standard or a modification of Zoning Code requirements or architectural design requirements that exceed the minimum building standards approved by the California Building Standards Commission. One or more incentives can be requested by the applicant in accordance with Section 18.26.070. The term "incentive" includes the term "concession" as that term is used in California Government Code Section 65915(k)(1).
"Low-Income" is defined as less than 80 percent of the area median income as defined by Section 50079.5 of the California Health and Safety Code.
"Low-Income Unit" is defined as a unit with an affordable rent or payment that does not exceed 35 percent of 110 percent of area median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit as established by the State Department of Housing and Community Development. "Market-Rate Unit" is defined as a dwelling unit where the rental rate or sales price is not restricted either by this chapter or by requirements imposed through other local, state, or federal affordable housing programs.
"Moderate-Income" is defined as less than 120 percent of the area median income as defined in Section 50093 of the California Health and Safety Code.

Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) "Moderate-Income Unit" is defined as a unit with an affordable rent or payment that does not exceed 35 percent of 110 percent of area median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit as established by the State Department of Housing and Community Development. "Very Low-Income" is defined as less than 50 percent of the area median income as defined in Section 50105 of the California Health and Safety Code. "Very Low-Income Unit" is defined as a unit with an affordable rent or payment that does not exceed 30 percent of 50 percent of the area median income adjusted for family size appropriate for the unit as established by the State Department of Housing and Community Development. "Senior Citizen Housing Development" is defined as a housing project where residency is restricted to persons 62 years of age or older, or 55 years of age or older in a Senior Citizen Housing Development, in accordance with Sections 51.3 and 51.12 of the California Civil Code.

18.26.040 Eligibility Projects Eligible for a Density Bonus A developer of a housing development may qualify for a density bonus and/or at least one other incentive as provided by this chapter if the developer does one of the following and complies with the affordability requirements of this chapter and CGC Section 65915. Density bonuses may be granted in the following circumstances:

1.A. Agrees to construct and maintain at At least 5 percent of the units reserved for are restricted to very low-income households.

2.B. Agrees to construct and maintain at At least 10 percent of the units reserved for are restricted to low-income households.

3.C. Agrees to construct and maintain at At least 10 percent of the units in a for sale common interest development (as defined in Section 1351 of the California Civil Code) reserved for are restricted to moderate-income households, provided that all units in the development are offered to the public for purchase.

4.D. Agrees to construct and maintain a senior citizen housing development as defined in Section

18.26.030 of this chapter.One hundred percent of the housing units (other than the managers’ units) are restricted to very low, low, and moderate-income residents (with a maximum of 20 percent moderate units.)
Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding)

5.E Donates land to the City dedicated for the construction of very low-income units pursuant to Section 18.26.090 of this chapter.At least 10 percent of the housing units are for transitional foster youth, disabled veterans or homeless persons, with rents restricted at the very-low income level.

6.F. Includes a qualifying child care facility as described in Section 18.26.080 of this chapter, in addition to providing housing as described in Items 1 through 3 of this section.At least 20 percent of the units are for low income college students at housing dedicated for full-time students at accredited colleges.

H. The project is a senior housing development (no affordable units required.) I. The project is a mobile home park age-restricted to senior citizens (no affordable units required.)

If a project is exempt from a discretionary permit under Government Code Sections 65400 and 65582.1 (Senate Bill No. 35 approved by Governor September 29, 2017), a site development permit issued by director the Director shall be required solely for the purpose of processing the density bonus request.

1..A. A site plan that identifies includes the identification of all units in the project including the location and size of the affordable/bonus units.

2.B. A brief narrative describing the project including information on:

1. The number of units permitted under the General Plan and Zoning of the property.

2. The total number of units proposed in the project.

3. The number of affordable and/or senior units proposed and a breakdown of units proposed for very low-, low-, and moderate-income, senior citizen, and market rate units.

4. The number of bonus units, if any, requested based on the tables provided in Section

18.26.060 of this chapter.

5. A phasing plan (if applicable) that provides for the timely development of the affordable units proportionate to each proposed phase of development.

Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding)

6. Any requested incentive(s), concessions, or waiver/modification of development standards, including an explanation as to why the requested action is required for the development (see Section 18.26.070, Incentives and Waiver/Modification of Development Standards).

3.C. The specific financial information and data (i.e., pro forma) relied upon by the developer that establishes the monetary value of the incentives/waivers/modification of development standards requested by the developer and a concise statement of how such value was calculated. A clear statement of how the requested incentive(s) is necessary to make the proposed housing development economically feasible shall be provided. The information shall be sufficiently detailed to enable City staff to examine the conclusions reached by the developer.

1. Pro Forma Exceptions: Projects that are consistent with any of the items described in "a," and/or "b," and/or “c” below are exempt from the requirement to provide a pro forma unless the Director determines that the nature of the proposed development warrants submittal of financial information sufficient to demonstrate that the requested incentives are required for the economic viability of providing affordable units in the project:
a. Projects with market rate units totaling 25 percent or less of proposed total residential units.
b. Projects that request modification (deviations from a standard that does not exceed 25 percent) of the following base zoning district requirements in recognition by the City that they may result in actual and financially sufficient cost reductions:
i. Yard setbacks, except where a skyplane or multistory setback is required. ii. Lot coverage.
iii. Lot area, width, or depth.
iv. Distance between structures (shall not conflict with the Building Code). v. Off-street parking reductions requested by the applicant that comply with the State Density Bonus Law and Section 18.26.070B.6.
c. Financial participation in the project by the City.

4.C. Other pertinent information as the Director may require enabling the City to adequately analyze the economic feasibility of the proposed development with respect to the requested incentives. The City may, at its sole discretion, retain a consultant to review the financial information. The cost of the consultant review shall be borne by the applicant.

Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) D. The applicant notification and processing timelines of CGC Section 65915 shall apply.

18.26.060 Density Bonus Allowance
Density Bonus Allowance. In calculating the number of units required for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households, the density bonus units shall not be included as illustrated in the following example.Allowances shall be in accordance with CGC Section 65915 and any additional allowances provided by this chapter. subject to the City’s application and processing requirements contained in Section 18.26.050. A development that satisfies all pertinent provisions of this chapter shall be allowed the following applicable density bonuses of CGC Section 65915 by right, subject to the City’s application and processing requirements contained in Section 18.26.050. At the City’s sole discretion, and consistent with state law, nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the City from granting a density bonus greater than what is described in this section afforded by CGC 65915 or from granting a proportionately lower density bonus for developments that do not meet the requirements of this section chapter. In accordance with State Density Bonus Law, an applicant must choose a density bonus from only one affordability category shown below and may not combine categories with the exception of child care facilities or land donation, which may be combined with the available housing density bonus up to a maximum density bonus of 35 percent. In calculating the number of units required for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households, the density bonus units shall not be included as illustrated in the following example.

Example: Proposed construction of 100-unit apartment development. Developer requests a density bonus and agrees to reserve 5 percent of the units as very low-income units. 100 units x 5 percent very low-income = 5 very low-income units 100 units x 20 percent density bonus = 20 bonus units (of which 5 must be available as very low-income units)
A development that satisfies all pertinent provisions of this chapter shall be allowed the following applicable density bonuses by right. At the City’s sole discretion, and consistent with state law, nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit the City from granting a density bonus greater than what is described in this section or from granting a proportionately lower density bonus for developments that do not meet the requirements of this section. In accordance with State Density Bonus Law, an applicant must choose a density bonus from only one affordability category shown below and may not combine categories with the exception of child care facilities or land donation, which may be combined with the available housing density bonus up to a maximum density bonus of 35 percent.

1. Very Low-Income. The density bonus for very low-income units shall be calculated as follows:

Percentage of
Very LowIncome Units
Percentage
Density Bonus
Percentage of
Very LowIncome Units
Percentage
Density Bonus
5 20 9 30
6 22.5 10 32.5
Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) 7 25 11 35
8 27.5

2. Low-Income. The density bonus for low-income units shall be calculated as follows:

Percentage of
Low-Income
Units
Percentage
Density Bonus
Percentage of
Low-Income
Units
Percentage
Density Bonus
10 20 16 29
11 21.5 17 30.5
12 23 18 32
13 24.5 19 33.5
14 26 20 35
15 27.5

3. Moderate-Income. The density bonus for moderate-income ownership units shall be calculated as follows:

Percentage of
Moderate-Income
Units Percentage
Density Bonus
Percentage of
Moderate-Income
Units Percentage
Density Bonus
10 5 26 21
11 6 27 22
12 7 28 23
13 8 29 24
14 9 30 25
15 10 31 26
16 11 32 27
17 12 33 28
18 13 34 29
19 14 35 30
20 15 36 31
21 16 37 32
22 17 38 33
23 18 39 34
24 19 40 35
Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) 25 20

4. Senior Citizen Housing Development. The density bonus for a senior citizen housing development that provides housing for seniors consistent with Section 18.26.040 of this chapter shall be 20 percent.

5. Child Care Facility. A project (whether a housing, commercial, or industrial project) is eligible for a density bonus for a child care facility when in compliance with Section

18.26.080 of this chapter and California Government Code Section 65917.5.

6. Donation of Land. A project is eligible for the following density bonus for the donation of land for the construction of affordable housing units when in compliance with Section

18.26.090 of this chapter:

Percentage of
Very LowIncome Units
Percentage
Density Bonus
Percentage of
Very LowIncome Units
Percentage
Density Bonus
10 15 21 26
11 16 22 27
12 17 23 28
13 18 24 29
14 19 25 30
15 20 26 31
16 21 27 32
17 22 28 33
18 23 29 34
19 24 30 35
20 25

7. Conversion of Apartments to Condominiums. A project is eligible for a 25 percent density bonus for the conversion of apartments to condominiums when in compliance with California Government Code Section 65915.5.

18.26.070 Incentives and Waiver/Modification of Development Standards A. Eligibility for Incentives. Incentives are available to a housing developer as follows:
specified in CGC Section 65915. At its sole discretion, the City may grant incentives that exceed CGC Section 65915 requirements, including providing incentives in cases where bonus units are not being requested in order to facilitate development of affordable housing units.

Packet Pg. 539 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding)

1. One incentive for housing developments that: (1) restrict at least 10 percent of the total units to low-income households, at least 5 percent for very low-income households, or at least 10 percent for persons and families of moderate income in a common interest development or (2) are for Senior Housing.

2. Two incentives for housing developments that restrict at least 20 percent of the total units to low-income households, at least 10 percent for very low-income households, or at least 20 percent for persons and families of moderate income in a common interest development.

3. Three incentives for housing developments that restrict at least 30 percent of the total units for low-income households, at least 15 percent for very low-income households, or at least 30 percent for persons and families of moderate income in a common interest development.

At its sole discretion, the City may grant additional incentives and may approve one or more incentives in cases where bonus units are not being requested in order to facilitate development of affordable housing units.

B. Available Incentives. Incentives may include, but are not limited to:

2. A density bonus greater than the amount allowed by this chapterminimum required by CGC Section 65915.

3. Other regulatory incentives proposed by the developer or the City that result in identifiable, financially sufficient, and actual cost reductions.

5. If an applicant qualifies for a density bonus pursuant to this chapter, the applicant may request, in addition to any requested incentive(s), that the following parking requirement Packet Pg. 540 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) be applied to the project in place of the City’s current parking requirements. The parking requirement is inclusive of handicapped and guest parking for the entire housing development. On-street parking spaces shall not be utilized to satisfy the parking requirements of this section. Tandem parking arrangements may be requested.

Zero to one bedroom 1 on-site parking space
Two to three bedrooms 2 on-site parking spaces
Four or more bedrooms 2.5 on-site parking spaces
C. Waiver/Modification of Development Standards. Pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(e)(1), an applicant may request a waiver or reduction of a development standard that would otherwise physically preclude the construction of a development at the density or with the incentive(s) permitted by this chapter. Such standards, include, but are not necessarily limited to, those described in Section B (Available Incentives) above.

18.26.080 Child Care Facilities
Child Care Facility Density Bonus. If a density bonus is requested for construction of a childcare facility pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(h), the application shall show the location and square footage of the proposed facility and provide evidence that the requirements of that Government Code Section have been met.

18.26.090 Donation of Land
A. Donation of Land Density Bonus. If a density bonus is requested for the donation of land pursuant to Government Code Section 65915(g), the application shall show the location of the land to be dedicated and provide evidence that the requirements of that Government Code Section have been met.

18.26.100080 General Development Criteria
The following criteria shall apply to housing development projects that have received bonus density units in accordance with this chapter:

B. Affordable housing units should be dispersed throughout the project site, whenever reasonably possible.

D. The exterior design and appearance of the affordable dwelling units shall be visually indistinguishable from market rate units in the development in terms of overall design and use of materials.

Packet Pg. 541 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding)

18.26.110090 Required Findings
The following findings shall be made prior to approving applications for a density bonus and requests for incentives, as provided in this chapter.

A. Density Bonus Approval (additional units only, no incentives requested).

Finding:

1. The density bonus request meets the requirements of this chapter.

B. Density Bonus Approval with Incentive(s) or Waiver/Modification of Development Standards.

Findings:

1. The density bonus request meets the requirements of this chapter.

2. The incentive is required in order to provide affordable housing.

Specific adverse impact means a significant, quantifiable, direct, and unavoidable impact, based on objective, identified written public health or safety standards, policies, or conditions as they existed on the date the application was deemed complete.

4. Approval of the incentives is not contrary to state or federal law.

18.26.120100 Affordable Housing Agreement Required
A. Form and Content of Agreement. The applicant shall submit an Affordable Housing Agreement (AHA) for City review. The form of the AHA will vary, depending on the manner in which the provisions of this chapter are satisfied for a particular development. For example, an affordable housing development may utilize public funding sources that require long-term affordability, monitoring, and reporting consistent with this chapter. In such cases, the requirements of such program may be sufficient, and an AHA may not be required. The form and content of the AHA (or equivalent document) shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Attorney. The AHA shall be recorded as a restriction on the parcel or parcels on which the affordable housing units will be constructed. The approval and recordation of the AHA shall take place prior to any final map being recorded or, where a map is not being processed, prior to issuance of a building permit(s) for such parcel or units.

The AHA shall be binding on all future owners and successors in interest. An AHA must include, at a minimum, the following:

1.B. Continued Affordability. The AHA shall include the procedures and mechanisms proposed by the developer to maintain the continued affordability of all affordable housing units, whether rental or ownership units. An applicant shall agree to, and the City shall ensure, Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) continued affordability of all very low-and low-income units that qualified the applicant for the award of the density bonus for 3055 years, or a longer period of time if required by the construction or mortgage-financing assistance program, mortgage-insurance program, or rental-subsidy program. Rents for very-low and low-income units shall be set at an affordable rent as defined in Section 18.26.030 of this chapterCGC Section 65015. Owner-occupied units shall be available at an affordable housing cost as defined in Section 18.26.030 of this chapterCGC Section 65015. The following specific items shall be addressed in the AHA:

Ownership Units. State Density Bonus Law and this chapter require the following ownership housing options and requirements for affordable ownership units:
 Very Low-Income/Low-Income Units. Units shall be sold to very low- or low-income households who shall occupy the units as their principal residence. The purchaser of each affordable housing unit shall execute an instrument or agreement approved by the City and to be recorded against the property, restricting the sale of the affordable housing units to very low- and low- income households for a minimum of 30 years.  Moderate-Income Units (common-interest development). The initial sale of a unit within an affordable common interest development, as defined in Section 1351 of the California Civil Code, shall be restricted to moderate-income households. The owner shall occupy the unit and shall execute an instrument or agreement to be recorded against the property, which provides for equity-sharing as set forth in Government Code Section 65915 when and if the unit is sold.

Rental Units. The AHA shall contain procedures for establishing affordable rent, filling vacancies, maintaining the units for eligible tenants, verifying household incomes, and providing annual reports necessary to demonstrate compliance with this section.

18.26.130110 Administrative Fee
An administrative fee may be established by the City Council for City review of all materials submitted in accordance with this chapter and for ongoing enforcement of its provisions.

18.26.140120 Violation of Affordable Housing Cost Requirements In the event it is determined that rents in excess of those allowed by operation of this chapter have been charged to a tenant residing in an affordable rental unit, the City may take the appropriate legal action to recover, and the rental unit owner shall be obligated to pay to the tenant (or to the City in the event the tenant cannot be located), any excess rent charges. In the event it is determined that a sales price in excess of that allowed by operation of this chapter has been charged to an income-eligible household purchasing an affordable ownership unit, the City may take the appropriate legal action to recover, and the affordable residential unit seller shall be obligated to pay to the purchaser (or to the City in the event the purchaser cannot be located), any sales proceeds determined to be in excess of the affordable price.

18.36.030 Land Use Regulations
Schedule 18.36.030-A below prescribes the land use regulations for the "Public Facilities" District.

The regulations for this district are established by letter designation as follows:

Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) "P" designates permitted use classifications.
"S" designates use classifications that are permitted after review and approval of a site development permit by the Board of Administrative Review. "U" designates use classifications that are permitted after review and approval of a use permit by the Planning Commission.

Schedule 18.36.030-A Land Use Regulations
Use Classifications "PF" Additional
Regulations
Public and Semi-Public Uses
Cemetery U
Clubs and Lodges S 1
Colleges and Trade Schools, Public or Private S 1
Commercial Support Services S 1
Community Social Service Facilities U
Cultural Institutions S 1
Day Care Center (14 or more) S 1
Golf Courses, Public or Private U
Government Offices S 1
Hospitals and Clinics (including emergency care) S 1
Offices of Philanthropic/Nonprofit Organizations S 1
Park & Recreation Facilities S 1
Parking, Public S 1
Public Maintenance and Service Facilities U
Public Safety Facilities S 1
Religious Facilities S 1
Residential, Public and Not for Profit S 1
Residential Care, General S 1
Residential Care, Senior S 1
Schools, Public or Private S 1
Supportive Housing Facilities S 1
Transitional Housing Facilities S 1
Transportation, Communication, and Utilities Uses
Airports and Heliports U
Communication Antennae and Transmission Towers U
Transportation Passenger Terminals U
Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Use Classifications "PF" Additional
Regulations
Utilities, Major U
Utilities, Minor P
Residential Uses
Residential Cannabis Cultivation L19 P See Chapter

6.12 Commercial Uses
Commercial Cannabis Cultivation -- Not
permitted
Retail Cannabis Sales -- Not
permitted
Industrial Uses
Cannabis Microbusinesses, Distribution, Manufacturing,
Processing, Testing, and Storage
-- Not
permitted
Agriculture and Extractive Uses
Goat Grazing for fire fuel management Sd Sd
Accessory Uses and Structures See Section 18.43.020
Notes:

L19 Indoor cannabis cultivation permitted in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 6.12, Cannabis Activity.
1 Use permit required if facility exceeds 30,000 square feet or 50 dwelling units.

Where a wood fence is substituted for a solid masonry wall, such fence shall be constructed so that the boards overlap or are otherwise designed such that a person cannot see through them as a result of subsequent shrinkage. The fence shall have fence posts of either wood treated to resist rot and termites or of iron, steel, or masonry; and in all cases, fence posts must be set in concrete. Under no circumstances shall walls, fences, or shrubbery be placed or maintained on the property in such a manner as to interfere with visibility so as to endanger Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) safe ingress and egress. As an alternative to a fence, an earth berm, or earth berm and wall, can be substituted for the required fence.

B. Street-Side Planter. The required front and corner side-yard setbacks shall be landscaped.

Notwithstanding the setback requirements established by this ordinance, where a parking lot abuts a 2-lane public street, it shall be separated therefrom by a planter not less than ten (10) feet in width. Where a parking lot abuts a 4-lane-or-more public street or a street designated on the General Plan as a 4-lane-or-more arterial street, it shall be separated therefrom by a planter not less than 15 feet in width. In commercial districts, landscaped setbacks from non-access State highways shall average no less than twenty (20) feet (15 feet minimum).

As an alternative to plants alone, the following other techniques may be used:

1. Grass-covered berm a minimum of three (3) feet in height with a slope not steeper than 3:1. A three (3) foot-high, open decorative fence in combination with climbing and nonclimbing plants.

3. A three (3) foot-high, minimum four (4) inch-thick, decorative solid masonry or concrete wall at the back of the planter with a ground cover and/or other plants between the wall and the street.

4. Vegetation or screening of any type shall
not exceed two (2) feet in height within
areas where adequate vehicle sight
distance would otherwise be obstructed.

Where such screening is adjacent to a
street corner or driveway intersection,
screening shall not exceed two (2) feet in
height in the triangle formed by the corner
and points at the curb thirty (30) feet from
the intersection or similar corner points
within twenty (20) feet of a driveway
intersection.

Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) C. Shade Trees. Shade trees shall be planted in the parking lot at a ratio of one tree for every four (4) spaces. Trees shall be dispersed on a generally equal basis throughout the parking lot to maximize the shading effect on the parking stalls. The landscape planter providing for any required tree shall have a minimum area of seventy-two (72) square feet and a minimum width of six (6) feet. To qualify as parking lot shade trees, the tree must be of a species and variety with an ultimate height and canopy that will provide a shading effect, and the trees must be within seven-and-one-half (7.5) feet of a parking space or driveway aisle and must not be located within the public right-of-way. A parking space shall not be more than fifty (50) feet from a shade tree. The planting plans shall be submitted with the building permit application and shall illustrate how the trees are to be irrigated and protected. The minimum size of each tree to be planted shall be a fifteen (15) gallon size. In those instances where parking is proposed underground or within a building, the tree to parking space ratio shall be 1:10. Said trees shall be planted within street-frontage planters or within other landscaped areas in the development.

C.D. Parking Lot Interior Landscape. The interior of all parking lots is to be landscaped at a ratio of sixty (60) square feet of landscape for each required parking space. For each additional space provided that exceeds the minimum parking requirement by more than five (5) spaces, or ten percent (10%), whichever is greater, eighty (80) square feet of landscape shall be provided for each excess space. The total required interior landscape area shall be evenly distributed throughout the parking areas. This requirement does not apply to parking lots that are underground or within buildings. Landscape areas that may be applied towards the required parking lot interior landscape area must have a minimum dimension of four (4) feet, be surrounded by or within seven-and-one-half (7.5) feet of a parking space or the aisle or pedestrian walkway serving it, or be within the required streetside landscape area adjacent to a parking space or aisle serving it. Landscape within a public right-of-way or in excess of the required streetside landscape addressed in Subsection B does not count toward meeting the minimum requirement. No more than twelve (12) parking spaces may be constructed in a row without separating the spaces with a landscape planter a minimum of eight (8) feet in width. Rows of parking spaces shall be separated from adjoining driveways with landscape end islands or peninsulas that are a minimum width of eight (8) feet. When calculating landscape area or width minimums, the area of the protective curbing shall not be included.

D.E. Pavement Edge and Planter Protection. Landscaped areas and pavement edges in all multiple-family, commercial, and industrial zones shall be protected from damage and deterioration by the placement of six (6) inch-high, securely anchored, continuous concrete curbs or equivalent materials which have a minimum width of six (6) inches.

E.F. Building Separators. Excepting single-family residences and second dwelling units, parking spaces directly abutting a building are prohibited. Parking areas shall be separated from a building by a raised walkway or landscape at least four (4) feet in width.

18.42.030 General Standards
A. Maximum Sign Area for Each Lot. Except in the "RL," "RE," "RS," "RM," and "PF" Districts, the maximum sign area for each lot shall be based on the scaled relationship between the lot's street frontage and area in accordance with the sign-area limitations of the lot's zoning district as established in Schedule 18.42.030-A. The most restrictive of the lot's frontage and area shall determine the maximum sign area for the entire lot. The mathematical Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) expressions for determining this area shall be as follows: starting with a street frontage of fifty (50) feet and area of six-thousand-five-hundred (6,500) square feet, for each twenty (20) feet of additional street frontage (on the same street) together with each two-thousand (2,000) square feet of lot area, additional increments of sign area according to the zoning districts noted in the schedule shall be permitted to face any one adjacent street in any one direction provided that no sign or cluster of signs on the lot shall exceed the maximum sign area for any one sign as set forth in Schedule 18.42.030-B of this section. The incremental sign-area increases are uniform except for the "LO" and "GO" districts, where the increase ceases at a maximum sign area of two-hundred (200) square-feet for a lot with a frontage of six hundred and ten (610) feet or an area of sixty-two-thousand-six-hundred (62,600) square feet; thereafter, regardless of the frontage and lot area, the maximum sign area shall be two-hundred (200) square feet. Ten percent (10%) of the allowable sign area per lot shall be reserved for temporary promotional advertising including banners and window-painted signs.

Maximum sign area allowed in the residential and public facilities districts noted above shall be based on the allowable sign type/size as indicated in Schedule 18.42.030-B. The allowable type and size shall be established by administrative sign permit or, in the case of new development, by the site development permit or use permit required by Chapter 18.36.

1. "Street Frontage" does not include streets or State highways from which the property cannot take legal access. This includes Interstate 5 and its on-/off-ramps; State Routes 299, 44, and 273; and local streets where access rights have been waived.

2. Multiple parcel shopping center and similar developments shall be considered a single parcel for the purpose of determining the maximum allowable sign area.

3. If the lot does not have street frontage, then the lot-area column of Schedule

18.42.030-A shall be used to determine the maximum sign area per lot.

LO GO NC
HC
GI
HI
SC
RC
GC
50 6,500 30 60 90 125 175
70 8,500 33 65 95 140 195
90 10,500 36 70 100 155 215
110 12,500 39 75 105 170 235
130 14,500 43 80 110 185 255
150 16,500 45 85 115 200 275
170 18,500 48 90 120 215 295
190 20,500 51 95 125 230 315
210 22,500 54 100 130 245 335
230 24,500 57 105 135 260 355
250 26,500 60 110 140 275 375
270 28,500 63 115 145 290 395
290 30,500 66 120 150 305 415
310 32,500 69 125 155 320 435
330 64,500 72 130 160 335 455
350 36,500 75 135 165 350 475
370 38,500 78 140 170 365 495
390 40,500 81 145 175 380 515
410 42,500 84 150 180 395 535
430 44,500 87 155 185 410 555
450 46,500 90 160 190 425 575
470 48,500 93 165 195 440 595
490 50,500 96 170 200 455 615
510 52,500 99 175 205 470 635
530 54,500 102 180 210 485 655
550 56,500 105 185 215 500 675
570 58,500 108 190 220 515 695
590 60,500 111 195 225 530 715
610 62,500 114 200 230 545 735
630 64,500 117 200 235 560 755
650 66,500 120 200 240 575 775
670 68,500 123 200 245 590 795
Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Area Determinants Zoning Districts/Maximum Sign Area (ft2) Street
Frontage
(ft)
Lot
Area
(ft2)

LO GO NC
HC
GI
HI
SC
RC
GC
690 70,500 126 200 250 605 815
710 72,500 129 200 255 620 835
730 74,500 132 200 260 635 855
750 76,500 135 200 265 650 875
770 78,500 138 200 270 665 895
790 80,500 141 200 275 680 915
810 82,500 144 200 280 695 935
830 84,500 147 200 285 710 955
850 86,500 150 200 290 725 975
870 88,500 153 200 295 740 995
890 90,500 156 200 300 755 1,015
910 92,500 159 200 305 770 1,035
930 94,500 162 200 310 785 1,055
950 96,500 165 200 315 800 1,075
970 98,500 168 200 320 815 1,095
990 100,500 171 200 325 830 1,115
1,010 102,500 174 200 330 845 1,135
1,030 104,500 177 200 335 860 1,155
1,050 106,500 180 200 340 875 1,175
1,070 108,500 183 200 345 890 1,195
1,090 110,500 186 200 350 905 1,215
1,110 112,500 189 200 355 920 1,235
1,130 114,500 192 200 360 935 1,255
1,150 116,500 195 200 365 950 1,275
1,170 118,500 198 200 370 965 1,295
1,190 120,500 200 200 375 980 1,315
1,210 122,500 200 200 380 995 1,335
1,230 124,500 200 200 385 1,010 1,355
1,250 126,500 200 200 390 1,025 1,375
1,270 128,500 200 200 395 1,040 1,395
B. Maximum Sign Area and Illumination for Each Type of Sign by Zoning District.

The maximum sign area, per sign, for each type of sign shall be based upon Schedule

Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding)

1. Definitions — Chapter 18.61;

2. Maximum number of pole, monument, and shopping center identifier signs per lot — Subsection E of this chapter;

3. Standards for certain types of signs — Section 18.42.040 of this chapter;

4. General sign construction standards — Section 18.42.060 of this chapter.

Schedule 18.42.030-B: Maximum Sign Area and Illumination for Each Type of Sign by Zoning District
Sign Type
"RL"
"RE"
"RS"
"RM" "LO" "GO" "NC" "SC"
"RC"
"GC"
"HC"
“CBDSP”
“UBDSP”
SGD-SP”
"GI"
"HI"

P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP
Detached
Monument – / 32 1 32/– 20/– 32/– 35/90 2 35/150 2 35/90 2 35/90 2 Public and
semipublic signs 35/90 3 35/90 3 35/90
3 35/90 35/90 35/90 35/90 –
Pole – – – – 60/90 90/150 90/150 90/125
Shopping Center
identifier – – – – – –/2004
–/2004–
Accessory sign – – 6/– 6/– 6/20 6/20 6/20 6/–
Signs on Buildings or Canopies
Mural
(non-advertising) – – – – –
300/301 or
greater
300/301 or
greater –
Super graphic – – – – – 200/400 200/400 –
Canopy, attached
or freestanding
(including gas
station canopies)
– – 20/– 30/– 30/– 35/– 35/– 35/–
Wall signs 12/24 1 20/40 20/40 25/50 75/– 200/250 5 150/200 5 150/200 5 Projecting – – – – 20/– 30/– 30/– –
Roof or Mansard
mounted – – – – 60/– 60/90 60/90 –
Marquee – – – – – 60/125 60/125 –
Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Sign Type
"RL"
"RE"
"RS"
"RM" "LO" "GO" "NC" "SC"
"RC"
"GC"
"HC"
“CBDSP”
“UBDSP”
SGD-SP”
"GI"
"HI"

P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP P/ASP
Public and
semipublic signs 12/243 12/24 12/24 12/30 60/75 60/90 60/90 60/90– Off-Site Signs See Sec. 18.42.080(H)
Animated Signs
Time and
temperature – – – 20/– 20/– 30/60 30/60 –
Rotating – – – – – –/90 –/90 –
Alternating
flashers
– – – – – – – –
Temporary Promotional Signs
Banners (vinyl or
canvas) – – – 12/– 12/–
24/50/51 or
greater 6
24/50/51
or greater 6
24/50/51
or
greater 6
Off-site signs and
displays for
public service
promotions
12/32 12/32 12/32 12–/32 12/32
Off-site real
estate signs –/32 –/32 –
On-site real estate
signs and
construction signs
See
Section

18.42.04 0(O)
See
Section

18.42.04 0(O)
32/– 32/– 32/– 32/– 32/– 32/–
Balloons and
dirigibles – – – – –
See Sec.

18.42.040(
B)
See Sec.

18.42.040(
B)
–
Beacons and
searchlights – – – – – P P –
Political Signs 12/– 12/– 12/– 32/– 32/– 32/– 32/– 32/– Window-painted
signs – – –
100 up
to 10%
of total
sign
area/200
or 30%
75 up to
10% of
total
sign
area
/200 or
30%
100 up to
10% of
total sign
area /200
or 30%
100 up to
10% of
total sign
area /200
or 30%
100 up
to 10%
of total
sign area
/200 or
30%
Notes:

Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) 1 For religious, general and senior residential care, and commercial recreation facilities only. (If illuminated, signs may be externally illuminated only.) 2 A monument sign up to ninety (90) square feet may be erected in lieu of a pole sign subject to meeting the requirements of Section 18.42.040(E). Monument signs exceeding ninety square feet require approval of a site development permit.
3 An administrative sign permit is required if the sign was not approved in conjunction with tentative map or planned development approval.
4 A use permit is required for a shopping center identifier sign. 5 Cumulative wall signage on any one wall shall not exceed twenty percent (20%) of the wall area on which the signs are located.
6 Maximum sign area for temporary banners associated with an administrative sign permit will be limited to the maximum sign area allowed in that zoning district.

A. Setbacks, easements, or in-fee dedications are required for the stream corridor and buffer areas as follows:

1. Ministerial projects (building permit; zoning clearance): development setbacks only.

At the request of the property owner, the City may accept an offer of dedication and accept fee title to the buffer area.

2. Discretionary land use entitlements (site development permits; use permits): dedicated to the City as an open-space easement.

3. Subdivision maps: dedicated to the City as an open-space easement or dedicated "in fee" to the City.

B. The average buffer widths depicted in Schedule 18.20.020-A may be increased by the approving authority if necessary to protect environmental resources as determined through the project environmental impact determination process.

C. Where Chapter 18.51, "FP" Floodplain Overlay District, requires greater setbacks or dedications than shown in Schedule 18.2048.020-A, the greater setbacks or dedications shall prevail.

E. It is intended that buffer areas be maintained in a natural state and not be landscaped.

Packet Pg. 553 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) F. Where constructed drainage devices and improvements are required, they shall be placed in the least visible locations and naturalized through the use of river rock, earth-tone concrete and/or native plant materials.

Packet Pg. 554 Attachment: ^Draft Strikeout Ordinance (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration - RZ-2024-01015 Page 1

ADDENDUM TO A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Prepared for Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015
Zoning Ordinance Text Cleanup Amendments

SUBJECT
Text cleanup amendments to the City of Redding Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 18.01, Titles, Components, and Purposes, 18.15, Zoning Exceptions, Chapter 18.26, Residential Density Bonus, Chapter 18.36, Public Facilities, Chapter 18.41, Off-Street Parking, Chapter 18.42, Signs, and Chapter 18.48, River/Creek Corridor Development.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed text cleanup amendments to the City of Redding Zoning Ordinance (Ordinance) are summarized below:

1. Section 18.01.050 is the general provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed amendment corrects a typo in the Base Zoning Districts table.

2. Section 18.15.040 regulates zoning exceptions. The amendment corrects a typo in the required findings for zoning exceptions.

3. Chapter 18.26 regulates residential density bonus. The amendment will bring this chapter into compliance with State law.

4. Section 18.36.030 is the land use table regulated uses in the Public Facilities District. The amendment will add Golf Courses as a use allowed with a use permit in the “PF” Public Facilities Zoning District.

5. Section 18.41.100 regulates screening and landscaping in off-street parking areas. The amendment will reinsert standards requiring shade trees within parking lot areas which were inadvertently eliminated in a previous code clean up.

6. Sections 18.42.030 are the general standards of the sign regulations. The amendment will reformat notes applicable to maximum sign area allowances. Further allow for larger temporary banners without a discretionary permit, thereby increasing the size criteria from 24 square feet to 50 square feet.

7. Section 18.48.030 are the development standards relative to river/creek corridor development. The amendment will correct the reference to the appropriate setback schedule for River/Creek Corridor Development Standards.

Packet Pg. 555 Attachment: ^Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration - RZ-2024-01015 Page 2

SETTING
The ordinance amendment pertains to properties Citywide.

DETERMINATION
The City of Redding previously prepared an Initial Study, and Mitigated Negative Declaration, for the adoption of the Redding Zoning Code. These documents were adopted on October 1, 2002. Based upon a review of the current amendments to the project, it has been determined that an addendum is appropriate because the additions are minor, and none of the following conditions (pursuant to CEQA Section 15162) have occurred:

1. Substantial changes are proposed for the project that will require major revision of the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration due to new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

2. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that involve new, significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.

3. New information of substantial importance indicates that:
a. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration.
b. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration.
c. Mitigation measures previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt them.
d. Mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous Mitigated Negative Declaration would substantially reduce one or more significant effects, but the project proponents decline to adopt them.

FINDINGS

1. The City of Redding has determined that an addendum is warranted, finding that none of the above conditions are in evidence and that there is no substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before the City, that the amendment proposal will have a significant effect on the environment.

2. The Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration, with its supporting documentation (Initial Study), reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redding.

Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: ^Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding) Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration - RZ-2024-01015 Page 3

MITIGATION MEASURES
The mitigation measures reflected in the original Mitigation Monitoring Program need not be altered.

PUBLIC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Pursuant to Section 15164(c) of CEQA, an addendum does not require circulation for public review.

Copies of the Addendum, the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and related materials may be obtained at the Planning Division of the Development Services Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact Lily Toy, Planning Manager, at (530) 245-7231.

September 17, 2024 ___________________________
Date Lily Toy, Planning Manager
Development Services Department
Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: ^Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration (6.2--Rezoning Application RZ-2024-01015, by the City of Redding)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Conduct a Public Hearing and, upon conclusion, authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize staff to apply for a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Program grant in the amount of $7 million; (2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the grant and any other documents necessary to complete the application process; and
(3) Find that applying for, and accepting, grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act; and
(4) Find that applying for funding is exempt under the National Environmental Policy Act §58.34(a)(3) administrative and management activities. If awarded, an environmental review will be completed for any grant funded activities once known.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fee or match requirement to apply for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing (PRO Housing) Program funds. Staff’s application for the funds would be used to assist income-eligible homebuyers with the purchase of homes in The Peaks Subdivision, otherwise known as the Quartz Hill Project.

The application will have no impact on current Housing Division grant funds or the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to authorize the City Manager to apply for PRO Housing funds and staff would research other grant opportunities to assist homebuyers.

MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 6.3
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.3--Public Hearing to consider Pathways to Removing Obstacles to Housing Grant Application
Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 558
Report to Redding City Council October 9, 2024
Re: 6.3--Public Hearing for Federal PRO Housing Grant Application Page 2 Background/Analysis
PRO Housing is a competitive federal grant opportunity that provides grant funding to communities that have been actively taking steps in addressing local housing barriers to increase the production of income-eligible housing. Round 2, PRO Housing Program has appropriated $100 million for communities across the country. This grant is competitive and an estimated 30 projects will be awarded.

As a part of the public participation process to apply for these funds, HUD requires the applicant to conduct a public hearing regarding the application. Following the close of the hearing, Council may consider any testimony received during the hearing to make a final decision regarding the application for grant funds.

Environmental Review
Approving an application to apply for grant funding from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Approving an application to apply for funding is exempt under the National Environmental Policy Act §58.34(a)(3), administrative and management activities. If awarded, an environmental review will be completed for the activity itself once all of the details are known.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain and attract businesses, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 559

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Accept a presentation from United Way of Northern California on the Mark Street Emergency Housing Site located at 3211 Mark Street;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to execute the Third Amendment to the Sublease between the City of Redding (City) and United way of Northern California extending the term of the Property Sublease (C-9664) for up to two years, thereby terminating December 31, 2026 - conditioned upon the Redding Area Bus Authority (RABA) Board of Directors approving a Property Lease amendment between the City and RABA to extend the lease term to December 31, 2026;
(3) Find that receiving a presentation and providing direction to the City Manager on future sublease extensions is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required; and
(4) Find that receiving a presentation and providing direction to the City Manager on future sublease extensions is considered an exempt activity under National Environmental Policy Act, 24 CFR §58.34(a)(3) administrative activities.

Fiscal Impact
The extension of the Mark Street Emergency Housing Site (Mark Street EHS) will not impact the General Fund.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to extend the sublease at the Mark Street EHS and therefore United Way of Northern California’s operations at the site would cease on December 31, 2024 (the end date of the current sublease). Should Council wish to extend the lease with United Way of Northern California (United Way), the City of Redding (City) would present a Property Lease amendment to the Redding Area Bus Authority (RABA) Board of Directors to extend the lease to December 31, 2026.

MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.2(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(a)--Consider United Way's Mark Street Emergency Housing Site Presentation and Property Sublease Extension.

Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 560
Report to Redding City Council October 9, 2024
Re: 9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Housing Site Page 2
Background/Analysis
A Property Lease between the City and RABA was executed on July 22, 2022 that included a two-year term with two, one-year options for RABA property located at 3211 Mark Street (Site) Lease consideration for the site included the City’s oversight of the property and monitoring and maintaining the property throughout the lease term.

In turn, the City subleased the site to the United Way for the Mark Street EHS operation.

United Way’s original sublease with the City commenced on January 13, 2023, and was amended to expire on December 31, 2024. In exchange for the United Way to sublease, the United Way is providing the oversight and asset management of the site as well as providing services to the unsheltered population.

The United Way has expressed interest in extending its Mark Street EHS operations and has requested that the property sublease with the City be extended for up to two years, terminating on December 31, 2024. Presently, United Way is improving the Mark Street EHS site to include additional temporary buildings for laundry, kitchen clean-up and a shower/bathroom trailer upgrade.

Council’s approval of the Third Amendment to the Subleases would be conditioned on the RABA Board approving a property lease amendment with the City, extending the lease term to December 31, 2026.

Environmental Review
Receiving a presentation and providing direction to the City Manager on future lease extensions is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Receiving a presentation and giving direction to staff is considered an exempt activity under National Environmental Policy Act, 24 CFR §58.34(a)(3) administrative activities.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
● Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
● Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022)
First Amendment to Sublease (12-19-23)
Second Amendment to Sublease (6-18-24)
Third Amendment to Sublease
Packet Pg. 561
Packet Pg. 562
Attachment: Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 563
Attachment: Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 564
Attachment: Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 565
Attachment: Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 566
Attachment: Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 567
Attachment: Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 568
Attachment: Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 569
Attachment: Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 570
Attachment: Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 571
Attachment: Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 572
Attachment: Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 573
Attachment: Original Property Sublease (12-20-2022) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 574
Attachment: First Amendment to Sublease (12-19-23) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 575
Attachment: First Amendment to Sublease (12-19-23) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 576
Attachment: Second Amendment to Sublease (6-18-24) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Packet Pg. 577
Attachment: Second Amendment to Sublease (6-18-24) (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Third Amendment to Sublease C-9664

THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE SUBLEASE

BETWEEN THE CITY OF REDDING AND UNITED WAY
OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA (C-9664)
This Third Amendment (“Third Amendment”) is made and entered into by and between the City of Redding, a municipal corporation, (“Sublessor”) and United Way of Northern California, a California non-profit corporation (“Sublessee”) (collectively the “Parties” and individually a “Party”).

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Parties have previously entered into Property Sublease on January 13, 2023 (C9664) for the purpose to sublease the Microshelter Site at the property located at the 3211 Mark Street (APN 108-360-026) and amended this Property Sublease on December 19, 2023 (First Amendment”) and June 18, 2024 (“Second Amendment”) (collectively referred herein as the “Sublease”); and
WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Sublease to extend the initial term; NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby agree as follows:

I. Section 1.02 of the Sublease is hereby amended and replaced in its entirety to read as follows:

1.02. The term of this Sublease (the "Term") shall commence on the date this Sublease is executed by the Sublessor and shall expire on December 31, 2025 with a one-year extension option to be approved by the City of Redding Manager and RABA Executive Officer. Sublessee may terminate this Sublease without demonstration of cause being necessary upon ninety (90) calendar days written notice to Sublessor at the address set forth in Section 9.06. Sublessor may terminate this Sublease without demonstration of cause being necessary upon ninety (90) calendar days written notice to Sublessee at the address set forth in Section 9.06.

Sublease shall be terminated and the Mark Street Property transferred back to the Sublessor in the event that program funding is not secured or if the program is terminated for any reason prior to the one-year term.

II. The foregoing Recitals referenced therein are hereby incorporated by this reference.

III. Except as expressly set forth herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Sublease shall remain in full force and effect.

IV. The effective date of this Third Amendment shall be the date that it is signed by the Sublessor.
[Signature Page Follows.]
Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Third Amendment to Sublease (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Housing Third Amendment to Sublease C-9664
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Sublessor and Sublessee have executed this Third Amendment on the days and year set forth below:

CITY OF REDDING
A Municipal Corporation
Dated: ________________ __________________________________ By: BARRY TIPPIN, CITY MANAGER
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS
City Attorney
_________________________________ __________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk By: NATALIA K. EBERSOLE,

ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY

SUBLESSEE

UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN

CALIFORNIA
Dated: ___________, 20____ ___________________________________ By: LARRY OLMSTEAD,

PRESIDENT, CEO
Tax ID No: 94-1251675
Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Third Amendment to Sublease (9.2(a)--Presentation by United Way to provide an update on the Mark Street Emergency Housing

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Informational item only.

Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund by accepting Development Services’ oral report.

Alternative Action
City Council (Council) could choose not to accept the oral report and provide other direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
In May 2024, the Development Services Department hosted a Development Stakeholders Group Discussion. Attendees included engineers, architects, developers, contractors, and City of Redding (City) staff, and a range of topics were discussed. For this oral report, staff will provide a summary of the feedback received from the stakeholder group and outline steps the City is now taking to improve the development permitting process.

Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.4(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.4(a)--Oral report to consider City of Redding Development Services Department updates.

Jeremy Pagan, Development
Services Director/Bldg
Official
Packet Pg. 580

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Informational item only.

MEETING DATE: October 15, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.6(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.6(c)--Oral report regarding the 2024 Community Creek Clean-Up held on September 21, 2024, spread across three sites along Calaboose Creek, located at 2024 California Street, 1501 Oregon Street, and 1445 Almond Avenue.

Travis Menne, Director of
Community Services
Packet Pg. 581

Redding City CouncilOctober 15, 2024

Redding City Council
October 15, 2024