Cities Index.
Agenda packet

Redding City Council
December 17, 2024

Document
Agenda packet
Meeting
December 17, 2024
Body
Redding City Council
Pages
7
Original file
195.6 MB
Text extracted from the city's file for reading and search. Open the original on reddingcityca.iqm2.com. That file is the official record.

Agenda
Regular Meeting
Redding City Council
Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA

December 17, 2024
6:00 PM

1. CALL TO ORDER - MAYOR JACK MUNNS
A. Pledge of Allegiance
B. Invocation - Rev. Patrick A. Blewett, D.Min., Ph.D. Simpson University C. Roll Call

3. PUBLIC COMMENT - for non-agendized matters within the city’s jurisdiction.

4. CONSENT CALENDAR
The Consent Calendar contains items considered routine and/or which have been individually scrutinized by City Council Members and are anticipated to require no further deliberation. If a member of the public wishes to address an item on the Consent Calend ar, please fill out a Speaker Request Form and submit it to the City Clerk before the Consent Calendar is considered . It shall be the prerogative of any Council Member, before the Consent Calendar is acted upon, to: (1) comment on an item; (2) respond to any public comment on an item; (3) request the record reflect an abstention or nay vote on an item; or (4) remove an item and place it on the Regular portion of the agenda for delivery of a staff report and/or an extended discussion or deliberation.

PURSUANT TO THE BROWN ACT, CITY COUNCIL CANNOT TAKE ACTION ON PUBLIC

COMMENT ITEMS

The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minute s per speaker for 30 minutes total, at the beginning of the meeting for Public Comment for non -agendized matters within the City’s jurisdiction.

The Mayor will determine the order of the speakers. If 30 minutes is not adequate to accommodate all of the individuals who have submitted a Speaker Request Form to the City Clerk, the Council will trail this item to the end of the open session agenda. The remaining speakers will address the City Council at that time.

If anyone wishes to address the City Council on any item considered at this meeting before or during Council’s consideration of that item, please fill out a blue Speaker Request Form, located in the lighted alcoves at the back of the Council Chambers, and submit it to the City Clerk. The City Council will allocate up to a maximum of three minutes per speaker for each agenda item. Staff reports are available on -line at the City’s web site at www.cityofredding.gov and in the Public View binder located on the podium at the north side of the Chambers.

PLEASE SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES. THANK YOU.

Redding City Council December 17, 2024

Page 2 ends

4(a). Approve City Council Minutes: Special Meeting of November 19, 2024; Regular Meeting of November 19, 2024; and Regular Meeting of December 3, 2024.

4(c). Adopt Ordinance No. 267 4, an ordinance of the City of Reddi ng amending Redding Municipal Code Title 11 (Vehicles and Traffic), Chapter 11.12 (Speed Limits) by amending Section 11.12.010 (Established on Certain Streets).

4.2(a). Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Approve the City of Redding’s 2024 Shelter Crisis Annual Report; (2) Authorize staff to submit the City of R edding’s 2024 Shelter Crisis Annual R eport to the State of California Senate and Assembly Committees by January 1, 2025; and
(3) Find that approving a Shelter Crisis Annual Report and submitting the report to the State of California is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act and no further action is required.

4.6(a). Adopt Resolution accepting a grant from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for funding through the Sport Fish Restoration - Boating Access Program in t he amount of $428,167; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute an agreement.

4.6(b). Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 66 th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2030 -060 increasing appropriations by $33,000 for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the reclassification of two positions within the City of Redding Recreation Division.

4.8(a). Authorize the City of Redding Fire Department (RFD) to submit an application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Assistance to Firefighters Gr ant Program in the amount of $1,000,000, with a 10 percent match requirement, for the replacement of RFD’s Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus.

4.11(a). Accept update regarding the Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project and, in accordance with Public Contrac t Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four-fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.

4.11(b). Accept an update regarding the City of Redding’s COVID -19 Economic Stimulus Package projects.

4.11(c). Approve and authorize the following actions relative to the Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2:
(1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program; and
(2) Approve the Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 as described, thereby satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines §15074.

Redding City Council December 17, 2024

Page 3 ends

4.11(d). Accept streetlight improvements in Shast ina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6 (S -7- 03/PD-5-04), as satisfactorily complete.

4.11(e). Accept the improvements in S hastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 8 (S-7-03/PD-5- 04), as satisfactorily complete; and adopt Resolution accepting the S hastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 8 (S-7-03/PD-5-04) streets for maintenance and operation.

4.11(f). Approve and authorize the following actions relative to the Victor and Cypress Avenues Active Transportation Project:
(1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Miti gation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program; and
(2) Approve the Victor and Cypress Avenues Active Transportation Project as described, thereby, satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines §15074.

4.11(g). Authorize and approve the following actions relative to the Summary Vacation of a Public Service Easement (A-2024-01427):
(1) Adopt Resolution summarily vacating a Public Service Easement located on Lot s 17 through 40 of the Salt Creek Heights Unit 2 Subdivision Map as described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B subject to the recordation of new Public Service Easements as depicted in Exhibit C;
(2) Find the action consistent with the General Plan; and (3) Find the action categorically exempt fro m environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15035 - Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations.

4.12(a). Approve the Local Appointments List consisting of Exhibits A and B relative to 2024-25 term expirations and vacancies for City of Redding Boards, Commissions, and Committees to fulfill the requirements of Government Code Section 54972 (Maddy Act).

4.15(a). Adopt Resolution, effective December 22, 2024, to:
(1) Amend the Unrepresented Non -Exempt Em ployee Schedule of Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates; and
(2) Amend the Non -Exempt Employee Schedule of Classifications and Hourly Wage Rates for Redding Independent Employees Association – Clerical, Technical and Professional Unit to increase salaries fo r positions impacted by the 2025 California Minimum Wage increase.

RECOMMENDATION: ACCEPT, ACKNOWLEDGE, ADOPT, APPROVE,
AND/OR AUTHORIZE ALL ITEMS ON THE CONSENT CALENDAR.

Redding City Council December 17, 2024

Page 4 ends

5. APPOINTMENTS

Mayor Munns

5.1. Consider Mayor's appointments and reappoin tments to the City of Redding Community Development Advisory Committee.

Recommendation:

Approve Mayor’s recommendation to make the following appointments and reappointments to the City of Redding Community Development Advisory Committee:
(1) Reappoint Aleta Carpenter to serve a full-term ending November 30, 2027; (2) Appoint Michael Van Tinte ren to fill an unscheduled vacancy with a term ending November 30, 2025;
(3) Appoint Bill Jostock to fill a scheduled vacancy with a full -term ending November 30, 2027; and
(4) Appoint Taff Harvey to fill a scheduled vacancy with a full -term ending November 30, 2027.

5.2. Consider Mayor's reappointments to the City of Redding Community Services Advisory Committee.

Recommendation:

Approve Mayor’s recommendation to reappoint T ony Lewis and Ericka Jones to the City of Redding’s Community Services Advisory Committee to serve full -terms ending December 31, 2028.

5.3. Consider appointment to the Shasta Mosquito Abatement and Vector Control District.

Recommendation:

Approve the Mayor’s recommendation to appoint John Albright to the Shasta Mosquito Abatement and Vector Control District Board to serve a four -year term beginning January 1, 2025, and ending December 31, 2028.

9. REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

City Manager

9.1(a). Consider appointing a replacement Ad Hoc Committee Member.

Recommendation:

Appoint replacement to the Redding Rodeo Ground Lease Ad Hoc Committee to fill the vacancy left by outgoing Council Member Joshua Johnson.

Redding City Council December 17, 2024

Page 5 ends

City Manager

9.1(b). Consider Air Service Agreement with United Airlines and Minimum Revenue Guarantee.

Recommendation:

Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate, and the Mayor to sign, an Air Service Agreement with United Airlines, Inc. for the purpose of operating scheduled passenger airline service to Denver from the Redding Regional Airport; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager , or designee, to appropriate up to $450,000 from the General Fund reserves for the purpose of closing the gap in funding for the required $2 million minimum revenue guarantee for the airline.

Personnel

9.15(b).

Consider Resolution affirming employee cost share increases for Classic Tier 1 and Classic Tier 2 Unrepresented Public Safety Police Management Employees.

Recommendation:

Adopt Resolution affirming additional employee pension cost share contributions as established in the Employment and Benefits Policies for Unrepresented Employees for Unrepr esented Public Safety Police Management Employees in the amount of

1.73 percent, for a total cost share employee contribution of 10.23 percent of the employers cost for Classic Tier 1 employees; and in the amount of 1.62 percent, for a total cost share emp loyee contribution of 10.12 percent of the employers cost for Classic Tier 2 employees, effective as soon as administratively feasible, but no earlier than January 5, 2025.

9.15(c).

Consider Resolution affirming employee cost share increases for Classi c Tier 1 Unrepresented Non-Safety Management Employees and Elected Officials.

Recommendation:

Adopt Resolution affirming additional employee pension cost share contributions as established in the Employment and Benefits Policies for Unrepresented Emplo yees for Classic Tier 1 Unrepresented Management employees and Elected Officials in the amount of .876%, for a total cost share employee contribution of 10.01% of the employers cost , effective as soon as administratively feasible, but no earlier than January 5, 2025.

11. COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORT(S)
City Council Member attendance at conference/meetings reimbursed at City expense. {Requirement of Assembly Bill 1234}
[A-050-060]

Information Only
Redding City Council December 17, 2024

Page 6 ends

12. SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS

FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS

13. ADJOURNMENT

Pursuant to the Brown Act, non -confidential materials related to an item on this agenda submitted to the City Council after distribution of the agenda packet are available for inspection during normal business hours at the Office of the City Clerk, 3 rd Floor, City Hall, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, California.

City Council Meetings will be televised live on Shasta Community Access Channels via Charter/Spectrum Cable channel 181 , a nd will be rerun on Thursday at 12:30 p.m. during the week in which the meeting is held. Additionally, the meeting can be viewed online at the following: https://www.shastaartscouncil.org/scactv. Video of the City Council meetings can also be viewed on the City’s web site at http://www.cityofredding.gov/. Open the Services tab, and select City Council Videos.

In compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act, the C ity of Redding will make available to persons with disabilities modifications or accommodations including auxiliary aids or services necessary to participate in public meetings. A person needing assistance should contact the Redding City Clerk by telephone at (530) 225-4447 or in person, or by mail at 777 Cypress Avenue, 3 rd Floor, Redding, California 96001 at least three (3) working days in advance.

The City of Redding will ensure that no person shall be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination under any of its projects, activities, services, or business opportunities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, sex, or disability, as afforded by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 an d related statutes as amended. All persons, regardless of their citizenship status, are covered under this regulation.

Questions, complaints, or requests for accommodations or additional information may be forwarded to the ADA & Title VI Coordinator at 77 7 Cypress Avenue, Attn: Personnel Dept., Redding, California 96001, Phone (530) 225-4065.

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve City Council Minutes: Special Meeting of November 19, 2024; Regular Meeting of November 19, 2024; and Regular Meeting of December 3, 2024.

Attachments
^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting - Closed Session of November 19, 2024 ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of November 19, 2024 ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 3, 2024 MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM NO. 4(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes.

Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 7
444
11/19/2024
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Special Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
November 19, 2024, 5:15 PM

The meeting was called to order by Mayor Tenessa Audette with the following Council Members present: Joshua Johnson, Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter.

Also present: City Attorney Christian M. Curtis, City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Clerk Sharlene Tipton, and Assistant City Clerk Anette Cates.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Mayor Audette determined that no one present wished to address the items agendized for Closed Session.

CLOSED SESSION

At the hour of 5 :15 p.m., Mayor Audette opened the Special Meeting and announced that the Council would adjourn to Closed Session.

At the hour of 6:04 p.m., Mayor Audette reconvened the Special Meeting to Open Session and reported that in reference to:

3A. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1):

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Warden v. Moore, et al.; U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California Case No. 2:19-CV-00431-MCE-AC

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

3B. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(1):

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION
Colburn v. City of Redding, et al.; Shasta County Superior Court Case No. 202762

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

3C. Closed Session pursuant to California Government Code Section 54956.8:

CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR
Property Location: 6950 Lockheed Drive; Assessor’s Parcel No. 056-610-004 Agency Negotiator: City Manager Tippin
Negotiating Parties: City of Redding and CAS Redding, LLC Under Negotiation: Price and Terms

Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.1(a), the City Council took no reportable action on this item.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at the hour of 6:05 p.m., Mayor Audette declared the m eeting adjourned.

APPROVED:

_______________________________
Tenessa Audette, Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 8
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Special Meeting - Closed Session of November 19, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 445

Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Regular Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
November 19, 2024, 6:00 PM

The meeting was called to order by Mayor Tenessa Audette with the following Council Members present: Joshua Johnson, Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter.

Also present: City Attorney Christian M. Curtis, City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Clerk Sharlene Tipton, and Assistant City Clerk Anette Cates.

Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Audette.

The Invocation was provided by Lynn Fritz, Native American Tradition as a Karuk Tribal Descendant/Shasta County Interfaith Forum Chair; and Joey Carroll, Native American Flute.

PRESENTATIONS

2A. PowerPoint p resentation provided by local Redding Neurologist Karen Gar naas, MD , incorporated herein by reference, providing information related to health issues associated with the overuse of Nitrous Oxide.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

The City Council took no formal action on this informational item.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Brenda opined that she is speaking on behalf of the homeless that lost their lives due to lack of services, and further opined that she and others had warned the City Council previously that the No Boundaries Transitional Housing Program did not have proper licensing, and opposed Christine Cage being blamed for its closure, and blamed the City Council for its demise.

Nick Gardner opposed giving the City Council a raise, and opined that the Council should follow tradition and not forget to appoint Mayor Pro Tempore Jack Munns as the next Mayor.

Ryan opined that the questioned why blame Christine Gage is blamed on the No Boundaries Transitional Housing Program, and not others, and further opined that the City Council should be careful in selecting programs that work and are successful in the future.

CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar and each Report to City Council (staff report) is incorporated herein by reference:

4(a). Approve City Council Minutes: Regular Meeting of October 15, 2024; Special Meeting – Closed Session of November 5, 2024; and Regular Meeting of November 5, 2024.

4(b). Accept and approve the following City of Redding Accounts Payable and Payroll Registers: (1) Accounts Payable Register No. 4 for the period October 1, 2024, through October 31, 2024, in the amount of $37,363,912.84; (2) Payroll Register No. 7 for the period September 15, 2024, through September 28, 2024, in the amount of $4,979,853.95; and (3) Payroll Register No. 8 for the period September 29, 2024, through October 12 , 2024, in the amount of $5,057,384.13; SUMMARY TOTAL: $47,401,150.92.

4(c). Adopt Ordinance No. 2672 , an ordinance of the City of Redding , a mending Title 11 (Vehicles and Traffic), Chapter 11.12 (Speed Limits) , by amending Section 11.12.010 to update Volume III, relative to speed limits on certain streets.

4.2(c). This item was moved to the Regular Calendar as item number 9.2(c) at the request of Mayor Audette.

Packet Pg. 9
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of November 19, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 446
11/19/2024

4.5(a). Authorize and approve the following actions regarding Bid Schedule No. 5513, Inspection and Overhaul of the Unit 9 Hydroelectric Turbine and Auxiliaries: (1) authorize additional funding for hydroelectric turbine repairs in the amount not to exceed $1,200,000; (2) authorize amendment to the Stephen’s Mechanical contract resulting from Bid Schedule No. 5513 for additional funding up to $1,200,00 0 ($725,000 for generator rewinding ; $300,000 for turbine and bearing repair; and $175,000 of contingency); (3) authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute change orders and /or amendment to the Stephen’s Mechanical contract up to the total amount of the project; (4) adopt Resolution No. 2024- 092, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 63rd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023 -060 appropriating $1,200,000 for the Unit 9 Hydroelectric Turbine Overhaul; and (5) find that this project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).

4.6(a). Authorize and approve the following: (1) approve and ratify submission of a grant application to the California State Library through the California Library Literacy Services for $120,380; (2) approve and ratify acceptance of grant funds awarded from the California State Library through the California Library Literacy Services Program to fund the Shasta Public Libraries’ English as a Second Language Services; (3) authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the Award Agreement and all subsequent documentation relative to the grant; and (4) adopt Resolution No. 2024-093, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 60th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating $60,190 for the California State Library award funds for English as a Second Language Services for fiscal year 2024-2025.

4.9(a). Approve the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with SHIELD Regional Training Consortium, Inc., a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to providing local training to the region’s law, fire, and emergency medical services entities ; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute the MOU.

4.10(a).Adopt Resolution No. 2024-094, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 67 th Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 re -appropriating available American Rescue Plan Act funding from various projects which are not expected to be expended or encumbered in the appro priate time frame and moved to fund City of Redding Police Department, Park Rangers through November 2026 for fiscal year 2024-25.

4.11(a).Accept update regarding the Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concret e Pavement on Placer Street Project and, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four-fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.

4.11(b).Authorize and approve the following relative to the purchase of a dump truck for the City of Redding Storm Drain Utility Division: (1) authorize staff to use Sourcewell contract pricing, with a net delivered cost of $219 ,590.05, including all applicable taxes and fees; and (2) authorize the City Manager , or designee, to approve future pricing adjustments, terms, and policy changes as needed up to an additional $10,000 for the purchase of the dump truck.
.

4.11(c).Approve an increase to the project construction contingency budget in the amount of $90,000, bringing the construction contingency total to $233,070, for the completion of Bid Negotiation No. 5452, Churn Creek Lift Station Rehabilitation Project.

4.11(d).Authorize and approve the following actions relative to Bid Negotiation No. 5531 (Job No. 2700), Liberty Street Sidewalk Improvement Project: (1) award to SnL Group, Inc. in the amount of $489,708; (2) approve $ 60,000 to cover the cost of administration and inspection fees; (3) approve $150,000 for project development costs; (4) approve $50,292 to provide construction contingency funding; (5) authorize the City Manager, or designee, to approve additional increases in either the construction management or construction contingency amounts up to a total of $44,575; and (6) find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15301 – Existing Facilities.

Packet Pg. 10
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of November 19, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 447
11/19/2024

4.11(e).Adopt Resolution No. 2024-095, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 62nd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No . 2023 -060 appropriating an additional $82,920 for environmental mitigation credits and balancing account budgets associated with three obligated Federal Emergency Management Agency projects for repairs along the Sacramento River trail for damages caused by the 2017 flooding event.

4.11(f).Authorize and approve the following: (1) partially accept the improvements in Shastina Ranch Subdivision–Unit 6 (S-7-03/PD-5-04) as satisfactorily complete, with the exception of the streetlights; and (2) adopt Resolution No. 2024-096, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, accepting the Shastina Ranch Subdivision–Unit 6 (S-7-03/PD-5- 04) streets for maintenance and operation.

4.11(g).Accept the improvements in Silverstone Subdivision Unit 3 (AMND-2020-01135/S-2019- 00280) as satisfactorily complete; and adopt Resolution No. 2024-097, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, accepting the Silverstone Subdivision Unit 3 (AMND- 2020-01135/S-2019-00280) streets for maintenance and operation.

4.11(h).Adopt Resolution No. 2024-098, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 64th Amendment to the City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 increasing appropriations by $24 ,000 for utility expense in Fiscal Year 2023 -24 and increasing appropriations by $1 0,000 for operating materials and supplies in Fiscal Year 2024-25, for the City of Redding-owned Benton Landfill.

4.12(a).Adopt Resolution No. 2024-099, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving an amended Appendix A (Designated Positions) to the City of Redding’s Conflict of Interest Code, Redding Municipal Code Chapter 2.90 (Conflict of Interest for designated positions of the City), in compliance with the California Fair Political Practices Commission biennial review requirements.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, seconded by Council Member Johnson, that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be ac cepted, acknowledged, adopted, approved, and/or authorized as recommended.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Johnson, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Audette NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None

Ordinance No. 2672 and Resolution Nos. 2024-092 through 2024-099 are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

6.1. Planned Development Application and Ordinance - approving a Rezoning Application by L&S Redding Development, LLC, to add the “PD” Planned Development Zoning Overlay Designation to the previously approved Riverstone Subdivision.

Planning Manager Lily Toy highlighted the Report to City Council (staff report) and presented a PowerPoint Presentation and a Memorandum to City Council dated November 19, 2024 (Memo), both incorporated herein by reference.

Ms. Toy noted that the Memo provided to Council and the public proposed revised conditions of approval by: (1) deleting condition number 7(f) - maintenance by the private home owner’s association (HOA) of all street lights interior to the subdivision and outside of the public right-of-way; and (2) adding condition no. 8: the covenants, conditions, and restrictions for the Riverstone Subdivision shall be amended to include ongoing payment by the HOA for all associated costs for Redding Electric Utility to maintain and operate all street lights interior to the subdivision located outside of the public right of way.

The hour of 6:38 p.m. having arrived, Mayor Audette opened the P ublic Hearing, and determined that no one present wished to address this matter and closed the Public Hearing.

The Affidavit of Publication – Notice of Public hearing is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Packet Pg. 11
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of November 19, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 446
11/19/2024
A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, and seconded by Council Member Munns, to: (1) offer uncodified Ordinance No. 2673 , approving Rezoning Application (RZ -2023-01709) consisting of rezoning of the Riverstone Subdivision to “RS-3.5-PD” Single Family Residential with Planned Development Overlay, for first reading by title only, and waive the full reading. The subject property consists of 10.5 acres located on property previously addressed as 2980 Wyndham Lane, generally located on the north side of Wyndham Lane at Lagoon Drive; (2) adopt the Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for Tentative Subdivision Map (S-2023-00582), Riverstone Subdivision, upon a determination that the necessary findings for approval are in evidence; (3) direct the City Attorney to prepare and the City Clerk to publish a summary ordinance according to law; and (4) approve Planned Development Application (PD -2023-01708) subject to the draft conditions of approval by deleting condition no. 7.f. to require the private maintenance of street lights , and adding condition no. 8 to amend the covenants, conditions, and restrictions for the Riverstone Subdivision to include ongoing payment by the Home Owner’s Association for all associated costs for Redding Electric Utility to maintain and operate all street lights interior to the subdivision located outside of the public right-of-way.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Johnson, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Audette NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None

City Attorney Curtis read Ordinance No. 2673 by title only and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

Mayor Audette stated that items 9.10(b) and 9.6(b) will be considered before item 9.1(a).

9.10(b).City of Redding General Fund Quarterly Financial Report.

Finance Director Greg Robinett highlighted the Report to City Council (staff report) and provided a PowerPoint Presentation, both incorporated herein.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, seconded by Council Member Mezzano, to accept the General Fund Quarterly Financial Report for the quarter ended September 30, 2024. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

9.6(b). Little League Field use fees and negotiati on of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Little League organizations.

Community Services Director Travis Menne provided the Report to City Council (staff report) and a PowerPoint Presentation, both incorporated herein by reference.

Lee lamp spoke in favor of an MOU and ask the Council to waive all fees for City of Redding Little Leagues.

Laura Hobbs, James Wilson, Jeff Hansen, and Steven Francis asked the Council not to raise the fees.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Winter, to: (1) accept the report; (2) direct staff to (a) negotiate and execute Memoranda of Understandings with East Redding and West Redding Little Leagues specific to ongoing use of the baseball fields; (b) waive field usage fees in Fiscal Year 2024-25 inclusive of all Little League Teams in the Redding area; and ( c) return to Council to discuss overall facility fees, including those of the field and nonprofits, in conjunction with the budget workshops in January 2025. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

Packet Pg. 12
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of November 19, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 447
11/19/2024

9.1(a). Approval of a Non -Binding Letter of Intent (LOI) regarding the R edding Rodeo Association Ground Lease negotiations.

City Manager Tippin provided a summary of the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

Mr. Tippin relayed that the LOI provides the framework for amending the lease agreement for the Redding Rodeo Grounds (C -141), and that a pproval of this LOI will allow both parties to proceed with formal negotiations, under a common understanding, to finalize a comprehensive lease amendment.

Ted Bambino thanked staff and City leaders for all the time and efforts they have invested in the process.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Munns, to approve the non-binding Letter of Intent with the Redding Rodeo Association.

The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

9.2(c). This item was moved from the Consent Calendar as item 4.2(c) at the request of Mayor Audette.

Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Disaster Rec overy Workforce Development Program grant application.

Community Development Manager Nicole Smith summarized the Report to City Council (staff report) and provided a PowerPoint Presentation , both incorporated herein by reference.

Ms. Smith noted that the Workforce Development Grant Program is likely one of the last CDBG Disaster Recovery Grant programs that the City can apply for that will help fund the recovery of Shasta County from the 2018 Carr Fire.

In response to Mayor Audette, Ms. Smith stated that approximately 200 kids/adults through the California Heritage YouthBuild Academy will benefit from this grant.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Munns, seconded by Council Member Winter, to : (1) authorize th e City Manager, or designee, to execute a City of Redding Partner Agreement with California Heritage YouthBuild Academy for an amount not to exceed $8,648,107; (2) find that executing the partner agreement and allocating grant funds is not considered a pro ject under the California Environmental Quality Act; and (3) find that executing the partner agreement and allocating grant funds is considered an exempt activity and no further action is required under the National Environmental Policy Act.

The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

9.5(b). Redding Electric Utility's Quarterly Financial Report, Industry Activities Update, and Power Content Label.

Assistant Director of Electric Utility – Distribution Joseph Bowers highlighted the Report to City Council (staff report) and provided a PowerPoint presentation, both incorporated herein by reference.

Mr. Bowers explained how rates are considered in response to Council Member Johnson’s questions.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, seconded by Council Member Munns, to accept the City of Redding Electric Utility’s Fiscal Year 2024 -25 First Quarter Financial Report, Industry Activities Update, and Power Content Label.

The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

Packet Pg. 13
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of November 19, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 446
11/19/2024

9.5(c). Authorize Transfer of Transmission Capacity Entitlement and Assignment of Rights.

Redding Electric Utility (REU) Director Nick Zettel summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), and provided a PowerPoint Presentation, both incorporated herein by reference.

Mr. Zettel noted that the intent is to mitigate wildfire liability and enhance financing for capital improvement projects by transferring REU’s 25 Megawatts (MW) of California- Oregon Transmission Project entitlement rights to the Transmission Agency of Northern California, a Joint Powers Agency (TANC).

City Attorney Curtis noted that the Joint Powers A uthority structure does provide some protection similar to a corporate entity, but is not quite as extensive. It primarily protects from liability for contractual obligations, and for potential tort liability, the public agency still remains proportionately liable.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, seconded by Council Member Munns, to authorize and approve the City Manager, or designee , to execute all necessary documents, including without limitation the agreements and amendments that: (1) transfer entitlement and assign Redding Electric Utility’s (REU) current 1.7496 percent ownership in the California -Oregon Transmission Project (COTP), as well as all associated rights, duties, liabilities, and oblig ations, from REU to the Transmission Agency of Northern California, a Joint Powers Agency (TANC); and (2) modify REU’s share, as well as all associated rights, duties, liabilities, and obligations, in the TANC project that allocates TANC’s ownership rights and duties in the COTP to the project participants, in the amount of the assigned (current) REU’s ownership of 1.7496 percent and duties in the COTP.

The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

9.11(i). This item, regarding Contractor's Control Termination with Abacus Construction, Inc. for the Eastside Road over Olney Creek Bridge Project, Bid Schedule 5180, (Job No. 2477) , was removed from the Agenda at the request of the City Manager.

9.14(a). Ordinance amending Redding Municipal Code Title 2 (Administration and Personnel) to increase City Council Member compensation pursuant to Senate Bill 329.

City Manager Tippin provided an overview of the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference. He noted that this item was amended to reflect an action item instead of an informational item, advised that revised agendas were available online and to the public in the audience, and apologized that this was not discussed in June as previously requested under item No. 12 at the May 21, 2024, Council Meeting.

Mayor Audette noted that after watching the meeting video on May 21, 2024, and researching Senate Bill 329, the Council compensation would only be for future City Council members.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

Steve Kohn and Nick Gardner opposed a raise for City Council.

The City Council unanimously declined to take any action on this item.

COUNCIL TRAVEL REPORTS

At Shasta Regional Transportation Agency’s expense, Mayor Audette stated that she attended the California Association of Councils of Governments board meeting in Sacramento, California, on November 15, 2024.

Packet Pg. 14
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of November 19, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 447
11/19/2024

SUGGESTIONS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS RELATIVE TO POTENTIAL TOPICS FOR

FUTURE CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS

At Council Member Julie Winter’s suggestion, a conse nsus of the Council directed staff to work with the Shasta County Health Department to find out more about the community wide issues associated with the overuse of Nitrous Oxide and return to Council for discussion at a future Council meeting.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at the hour of 9:02 p.m., Mayor Audette declared the m eeting adjourned.

APPROVED:

_______________________________
Tenessa Audette, Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk

Packet Pg. 15
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of November 19, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 452
Unofficial Minutes Redding City Council, Regular Meeting Civic Center Council Chambers
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
December 3, 2024, 6:00 PM

The meeting was called to order by Mayor Tenessa Audette with the following Council Members present: Joshua Johnson, Mark Mezzano, Jack Munns, and Julie Winter.

Also present: City Attorney Christian M. Curtis, City Manager Barry Tippin, Assistant City Manager Steve Bade, City Clerk Sharlene Tipton, and Executive Assistant Erin Barnhart.

Pledge of Allegiance was led by Mayor Audette.

The Invocation was provided by Redding Police and Fire Department Chaplain, Lori Moretti.

PUBLIC COMMENT

Nick Gardner opined the selection of Mayor should follow the historic process and that the homelessness issues in Redding need to be addressed.

**Due to the delay in certification results from the County of Shasta, t he Consent Calendar and Regular Calendar items were moved to the beginning of the meeting**

CONSENT CALENDAR
The following matters were considered inclusively under the Consent Calendar and each Report to City Council (staff report) is incorporated herein by reference:

4(a). Approve City Council Minutes: Special Meeting of November 5, 2024; and Regular Meeting of November 5, 2024.

4(c). Adopt Ordinance No. 2673 , an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, adopting an amendment to the City of Redding Zoning Map relating to the Rezoning of the Riverstone Subdivision (previously Assessor’s Parcel No. 048-500-048) consisting of 10.5 acres located on property previously addressed as 2980 Wyndham Lane in the City of Redding (RZ-2023-01709).

4.1(a). Authorize the Mayor to sign a Letter of Intent to sell City of Redding -owned surplus property located at 4455 Oasis Rd, (Assessor’s Parcel No. 114-310-019), to Renewed Life Medical Group for the sole intention of building a medical detox and short-term psychiatric center.

Jaclyn Tredway shared information about the Developing Diamonds community, incorporated herein by reference, that she thought was related to this item, however, it is related to a different development project on Oasis Road.

Council Member Johnson recused himself due to working with the applicant.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Audette NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – Johnson
ABSENT: Council Members – None

4.2(a). Authorize and approve the following: (1) adopt Resolution No. 2024-100, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, authorizing the City Manager , or designee, to execute all documents necessary to complete the application process for the California Department of Housin g and Community Development ’s Prohousing Incentive Program grant in an amount not to exceed $1 million; and (2) find that based on the facts in the record, applying for grant funding is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

Packet Pg. 16
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 3, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 453
12/3/2024

4.2(b). Authorize and approve the following: (1) authorize the City Manager , or designee, to execute the First Amendment to the Encampment Emergency Shelter Services Contract (C-10639) with the Shasta Community Health Center thereby increasing the contract amount from $60,000 to $165,000; and (2) find that amending a contract is considered an exempt activity under National Environmental Policy Act, 24 CFR §58.34(a)(3) administrative activities.

4.5(a). Authorize and approve the following: (1) award Bid Schedule No. 5534, Electric Line Clearance Services for Area 1 , as depicted in the attached map , to bidder Skyline Tree Enterprise Inc., for $750,000, plus a 25 percent contingency of $187,500, from issue date of the purchase order through December 31, 2025, with the option for two consecutive one- year contract extensions through December 31, 2027; (2) adopt Resolution No. 2024-100, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, approving and adopting the 61st Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 appropriating an additional $587,500 for electric line clearance and emergency operations services; (3) authorize the Purchasing Officer to amend and extend the purchase order(s) per the bid specifications, and to include an additional 25 percent (of the adjusted base contract amount) contingency allowance each additional year; and (4) find that this activity is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act, pursuant to Section 15301. Existing Facilities.

4.5(b). Authorize and approve the following actions regarding Bid Schedule No. 5520 for the installation of the Redding Power Plant Variable Frequency Drive (VFD) cooling systems:
(1) authorize an amount not to exceed $300,000 for the installation of the V FD cooling systems; (2) award Bid to Timberline Heating & Air Conditioning, in an amount not to exceed $300,000 including contingency ($235,38 0 for installation and $64,620 for contingency); (3) authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute change orders up to the total amount of the project contingency to address unforeseen work items discovered during the installation process; and (4) find that the project is categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act , pursuant t o Sections 15301 (Existing Facilities) and 15302 (Replacement or Reconstruction).

4.6(a). Accept the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection’s Wildfire Prevention Grants Program award in the amount of $1,546,413.20.

4.11(a).Accept update regarding the Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project and, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four-fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.

4.11(b).Award the lowest competitive bids for Bid Schedule No. 5538, Rock and Mineral Products to Tullis, Inc., J. F. Shea, Loucks Landscap e Supply, and Axner Excavating Inc., for the annual purchase of rock, asphalt, and mineral aggregates at an estimated cost of $350,000.

4.11(c).Authorize and approve the following: (1) authorize the Mayor to execute the F ifth Amendment to Consulting and Professional Services Contract (C -9021) with Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., in the amount of $ 48,327.01, for a total not -to-exceed fee of $272,791.41, for environmental services for the Stillwater Business Park Phase 2 Roadway Project; and (2) authorize the City Manager , or designee, to approve future contract amendments up to $30,000.

4.11(d).Authorize and approve the following: (1) authorize the Public Works Director to request a change of scope from CalRecycle for the Redding Organics Diversion to Energy Operation project (Project), eliminating the originally proposed bio gas pipeline injection station and constructing renewable energy generators at the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant; (2) direct staff to solicit request for proposals to select and pre -purchase equipment to construct this project; and (3) authorize the City Manager or designee to approve and sign all pre -purchased equipment agreements and contracts, not to exceed the previously authorized budget.

Packet Pg. 17
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 3, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 454
12/3/2024

4.11(e).Approve and adopt the following: (1) adopt Resolution No. 2024-102, a resolution of the City Coun cil of the City of Redding, authorizing the submission of all California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery grant application(s) for which the City of Redding is eligible for a five-year period from December 3, 2024, through December 3, 2029. This authorization includes applying for the Beverage Container Quality Infrastructure Grant program in the amount of $4,091,013 to upgrade and replace various sorting equipment in the City of Redding’s Material Recovery Facility on Abernathy Lane; and (2) authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all grant documents necessary to complete the application process.

4.15(a).Adopt a City of Redding (City) Personnel Policy - Password Policy providing guidance for administering passwords for the City as part of its efforts to maintain the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the City’s information, systems, and networks.

4.15(b) Authorize and approve the following: (1) adopt Resolution No. 2024-103, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, terminating the Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS) Defined Contribution Retirement Enhancement Plan for Redding Peace Officers Association; and (2) authorize the Personnel Director to complete the Notice of Termination informing PARS and U.S. Bank of the termination as Plan Administrator.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, seconded by Council Member Mezzano, that the foregoing items on the Consent Calendar be accepted, acknowledged, adopted, affirmed, approved, and/or authorized as recommended with the exception of those item(s) voted on separately above.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Johnson, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Audette NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None

Ordinance No. 2673 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

Resolution Nos. 2024-100 through 2024-103 are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

REGULAR CALENDAR: REPORTS & COMMUNICATIONS OF DEPARTMENTS,

BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES

9.2(c). Publish a Request for Proposals for Interim Shelter Services.

City Manager Barry Tippin provided an overview of the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Munns, seconded by Council Member Mezzano, to : (1) authorize staff to publish a Request for Proposals for interim shelter services for unsheltered persons associated with Linden/Mercy Canyon and Progress/Technology/Breslauer encampments in an amount not to exceed $1,463,960 utilizing grant funds from the City of Redding’s Encampment Resolution Funding Program Round 3 -Lookback funds; and (2) find that publishing a Request for Proposals is not considered a project under the California Environmental Quality Act.

The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

9.4(a). This item, Oral report - City of Redding Riverfront Specific Plan , was removed from the agenda at the request of staff to be considered at a future City Council Meeting.

9.11(f).Ordinance amending Redding Municipal Code Chapter 11.12, Speed Limits, in the City of Redding.

Public Works Director Michael Webb provided an overview of the Report to City Council (staff report) and a PowerPoint Presentation, both incorporated herein by reference.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

Packet Pg. 18
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 3, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 455
12/3/2024
A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Winter, seconded by Council Member Mezzano, to approve an authorized the following: (1) Ordinance No. 2 674, an ordinance of the City Council of the City of Redding, amending Redding Municipal Code Title 11 (Vehicles and Traffic), Chapter 11.12 (Speed Limits) by amending Section 11.12.010 (Established on Certain Streets) for first reading by title only and wai ve the full reading; (2) direct the City Attorney to prepare a summary ordinance, if needed, and authorize the City Clerk to publish the summary ordinance according to law; and (3) find that the action is categorically exempt from review under the Californi a Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) – Common Sense Exemption.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Johnson, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Audette NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None

City Attorney Curtis read the title of Ordinance No. 2674 and is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

PRESENTATIONS

The official Certification of County Clerk/Registration of Voters of the Results of the Canvass of the November 5, 2 024, General Election, was received electronically by the City Clerk at 6:25 p.m., therefore, the Council considered the following items:

2A. Adopt Resolution certifying the canvass of ballots as prepared by the Shasta County Clerk – Registrar of Voters; and declaring the results of the November 5, 2024, Consolidated General Municipal Election.

City Clerk Tipton highlighted the Report to the City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

Ms. Tipton stated that the candidates receiving the highest number of votes for two vacant offices of the City Council were Paul Dhanuka (23,636 votes/39.52 percent), Mike Littau (12,010 votes/20.08 percent); and the highest number of votes for one vacant short -term office was Erin Resner (17,974 votes/47.56 percent). Gregory Robinett received the highest number of votes (28,449 votes/100 percent) for the office of City Treasurer.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Mezzano, second by Council Member Munns, to adopt Resolution No. 2024-104, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, certifying the canvass of ballots as prepared by the Shasta County Clerk - Registrar of Voters; and declaring the results of the November 5, 2024, Consolidated General Municipal Election as follows: (a) Council Members-Elect Dr. Paul Dhanuka and Mike Littau received the highest number of votes for the two vacant City Council Member positions; (b) Council Member-Elect Erin Resner received the highest number of votes for the one vacant short -term City Council Member position; and (c) City Treasurer -Elect Gregory S. Robinett, as the only candidate, received the highest number of votes for the City Treasurer position.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Johnson, Mezzano, Munns, Winter, and Audette NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None

Resolution No. 2024-104 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

2B. City Clerk Tipton administered the Oath of Office to Gregory S. Robinette for a four-year term expiring December 2028.

2C. City Clerk Tipton administered the Oath of Office to City Council Members-Elect Dr. Paul Dhanuka and Mike Littau, who received the most votes at the time of certification by the County of Shasta Registrar of Voters on December 3, 2024, for a four-year term expiring December 2028.

Packet Pg. 19
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 3, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 456
12/3/2024
2D. City Clerk Tipton administered the Oath of Office to City Council Member-Elect Erin Resner for a two-year term, who received the most votes at the time of certification by the County of Shasta Registrar of Voters on December 3, 2024, expiring December 2026.

2E. Selection of the City of Redding Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Mayor Pro Tempore.

Mayor Audette summarized the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference, and made a motion as noted below.

Council Member Dhanuka noted that he preferred to have Council Member Resner’s seat be in the rotation for Mayor, and nominated Council Member Littau to be Vice Mayor instead of himself.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Audette, seconded by Council M ember Munns, to appoint Jack Munns to serve as the Mayor, Dr. Paul Dhanuka to serve as Vice Mayor, and Mike Littau to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore for a one -year term expiring December 2025.

This motion failed.

A SECOND MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Dhanuka, seconded by Council Member Resner, to appoint Jack Munns to serve as the Mayor, Mike Littau to serve as Vice Mayor and Erin Resner to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore for a one -year-term expiring December 2025. The Vote: Unanimous Ayes.

2F. Resolution honoring Julie Winter for her service on the Redding City Council.

Mayor Munns highlighted the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Audette, seconded by Council Member Resner, to adopt Resolution No. 2024-105, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, honoring Julie Winter for service on the Redding City Council from December 6, 2016, to December 3, 2024.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Dhanuka, Littau, Resner, and Munns NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None

Resolution No. 2024-105 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

2G. Presentations to Julie Winter in appreciation of her service as a member of the City Council for the City of Redding.

Mayor Munns and City Manager Tippin presented a City of Redding clock to Ms. Winter in honor of her time on the Redding City Council.

Mayor Munns presented Ms. Winter with a Certificate of Recognition from Senator Brian Dahle of the State of California Senate for her years of dedicated service to the community.

In honor of her dedication to public safety, Ms. Winter was presented with decorative challenge coins from the Redding Police and Fire Departments.

Ms. Winter wished the City Council her best for moving forward a nd thanked her family for their support.

Ms. Winter thanked the community, the City Council Members, and staff of the City of Redding.

Packet Pg. 20
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 3, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes) 457
12/3/2024

2H. Resolution honoring Mark Mezzano for his service on the Redding City Council.

Mayor Munns highlighted the Report to City Council (staff report), incorporated herein by reference.

A discussion amongst the Council ensued.

A MOTION WAS MADE by Council Member Audette, seconded by Council Member Resner, to adopt Resolution No. 2024-106, a resolution of the City Council of the City of Redding, honoring Mark Mezzano for service on the Redding City Council from December 1, 2020, to December 3, 2024.

The Vote:

AYES: Council Members – Audette, Dhanuka, Littau, Resner, and Munns NOES: Council Members – None
ABSTAIN: Council Members – None
ABSENT: Council Members – None

Resolution No. 2024-106 is on file in the Office of the City Clerk.

2I. Presentations to Mark Mezzano in appreciation of his service as a member of the City Council for the City of Redding.

Mayor Munns presented a City of Redding clock to Mr. Mezzano in honor of his time on the Redding City Council.

Mayor Munns presented Mr. Mezzano with a Certificate of Recognition from Senator Brian Dahle of the State of California Senate for his years of dedicated service to the community.

In honor of his dedication to public safety, Mr. Mezzano was presented with decorative challenge coins from the Redding Police and Fire Departments.

Mr. Mezzano thanked his wife, family, and friends for their support, and also thanked City staff and the community for their dedication.

2J. Mayor Munns presented an Appreciation Plaque to Joshua Johnson in honor of his service as a City Council Member-Appointee for the City of Redding from July 2024 to December 2024.

Mr. Johnson shared his appreciation for the opportunity to serve and noted he will continue to work for the Community.

2K. Mayor Munns presented a City of Redding Mayor's Appreciation Gavel to Mayor Emeritus Tenessa Audette in honor and appreciation of her service as the City of Redding’s Mayor from December 2023 to December 2024.

ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business at the hour of 7:41 p.m., Mayor Munns declared the m eeting adjourned.

APPROVED:

_______________________________
Jack Munns, Mayor

ATTEST:

_______________________________
Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk

Packet Pg. 21
Attachment: ^Unofficial Minutes - Regular Meeting of December 3, 2024 (4(a)--Approve City Council Minutes)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Ordinance No. 2674, an ordinance of the City of Redding amending Redding Municipal Code Title 11 (Vehicles and Traffic), Chapter 11.12 (Speed Limits) by amending Section

11.12.010 (Established on Certain Streets).

Attachments
^Ord. 2674 Title 11 Speed Limits Vol 1
MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM NO. 4(c)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4(c)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2674, amending Title 11 Vehicles and Traffic.

Sharlene Tipton, City Clerk
Packet Pg. 22
First Reading: 12/3/2024 MW (5-0)
Second Reading: 12/17/2024
Item No. 4(c)

ORDINANCE NO. 2674

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING TITLE 11
(VEHICLES AND TRAFFIC) CHAPTER 11.12 (SPEED LIMITS) BY
AMENDING SECTION 11.12.010 TO UPDATE VOLUME I, RELATIVE

TO SPEED LIMITS ON CERTAIN STREETS

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Title 11 (Vehicles and Traffic), Chapter 11.12 (Speed Limits), Volume I of Section 11.12.010 is hereby amended to read as follows:

11.12.010 - Established on certain streets.

SPEED LIMITS ON VARIOUS STREETS

VOLUME I

1 Airport Road
City Limits to Fig Tree Ln. 45 MPH
2 Bechelli Lane
S. Bonnyview Rd. to Cheryl Dr. (south) 45 MPH
Cheryl Dr. (south) to Third St. 40 MPH
Third St. to E. Cypress Ave. 35 MPH
3 Browning Street
Hilltop Dr. to Churn Creek Rd. 30 MPH
Churn Creek Rd. to Old Alturas Rd. 35 MPH
4 Canby Road
Dana Dr. to 170 ft. south of Jamieson Ct. 25 MPH
170 ft. south of Jamieson Ct. to 1,000 ft. south of Tanglewood Dr.
35 MPH
1,000 ft. south of Tanglewood Dr. to Churn Creek Rd. 30 MPH 5 Churn Creek Road
S. Bonnyview Rd. to Denton Wy. 45 MPH
Denton Wy. to Hartnell Ave. 40 MPH
Hartnell Ave. to E. Cypress Ave. 35 MPH
E. Cypress Ave. to Old Alturas Rd. 35 MPH
Old Alturas Rd. to Bodenhamer Blvd. 40 MPH
Bodenhamer Blvd. to SR 299 eastbound ramps 45 MPH
Packet Pg. 23
Attachment: ^Ord. 2674 Title 11 Speed Limits Vol 1 (4(c)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2674 amending Zoning Map for The Riverstone Subdivision.) First Reading: 12/3/2024 MW (5-0)
Second Reading: 12/17/2024
Item No. 4(c)

6 Cypress Avenue
Pine St. to Hartnell Ave. 40 MPH
Hartnell Ave. to Bechelli Ln. 35 MPH
Bechelli Ln. to Churn Creek Rd. 30 MPH
Churn Creek Rd. to Victor Ave. 35 MPH
7 Hilltop Drive
E. Cypress Ave. to Dana Dr. 35 MPH
Dana Dr. to Palisades Ave. 35 MPH
Palisades Ave. to Peppertree Ln. 40 MPH
Peppertree Ln. to Lake Blvd. 35 MPH
8 Keswick Dam Road
City Limits to Nash Rd. 40 MPH
100 ft. west of Lyons Rd. to Lake Blvd. 40 MPH
9 Knighton Road
City Limits to Lockheed Dr. 45 MPH
Lockheed Dr. to Airport Rd. 35 MPH
10 Mountain Lakes Boulevard
Beltline Rd. to George Dr. 40 MPH
11 Oasis Road
Lake Blvd. to City Limits 40 MPH
Woggon Ln. to Oak Leaf Ln. 50 MPH
Baier Rd. to Gold Hills Dr. 40 MPH
Gold Hills Dr. to Old Oregon Tr. 50 MPH
12 Old Oregon Trail
Airport Rd. to Harley Leighton Dr. 40 MPH
Oasis Rd. to Midland Dr. 50 MPH
Midland Dr. to City Limits 40 MPH
13 South Bonnyview Road
SR 273 to E. Bonnyview Rd. 40 MPH
E. Bonnyview Rd. to Bechelli Ln. 50 MPH
Bechelli Ln. to Churn Creek Rd. 30 MPH
14 Tarmac Road
Shasta View Dr. to Abernathy Ln. 35 MPH

Section 2. The passage of this ordinance is not a “project” according to the definition in the California Environmental Quality Act, and therefore is not subject to the provisions requiring environmental review.

Section 3. Severability. If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance and the application of such provision will remain in effect to the extent permitted by law.

Packet Pg. 24
Attachment: ^Ord. 2674 Title 11 Speed Limits Vol 1 (4(c)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2674 amending Zoning Map for The Riverstone Subdivision.) First Reading: 12/3/2024 MW (5-0)
Second Reading: 12/17/2024
Item No. 4(c)

Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of its adoption, and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption thereof and cause its publication according to law.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and read by the City Council of the City of Redding at a regular meeting on the 3rd day of December, 2024; and was duly read and adopted at a regular meeting on the 17th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

____________________________________
JACK MUNNS, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

________________________________ ____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

DATE ATTESTED: _______________, 2024

Packet Pg. 25
Attachment: ^Ord. 2674 Title 11 Speed Limits Vol 1 (4(c)--Adopt Ordinance No. 2674 amending Zoning Map for The Riverstone Subdivision.)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Approve the City of Redding’s 2024 Shelter Crisis Annual Report; (2) Authorize staff to submit the City of Redding’s 2024 Shelter Crisis Annual Report to the State of California Senate and Assembly Committees by January 1, 2025; and (3) Find that approving a Sh elter Crisis Annual Report and submitting the report to the State of California is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act and no further action is required.

Fiscal Impact

There is no fiscal impact related to the report.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could choose to not approve the City of Redding’s 202 4 Shelter Crisis Annual Report (Report), modify the report, or provide alternate direction to staff.

Background/Analysis

California Government Code Sect ion 8698 allows the governing body of a city to declare a Shelter Crisis when a significant number of persons are without the ability to obtain shelter, resulting in a threat to their health and safety. On June 15, 2021, the Council adopted a resolution declaring that the City of Redding (City) ha d a shelter crisis. Following this declaration, the Council approved two Ordinances (2637 and 2638), thereby amending Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Chapter 18.17.020 (Temporary Uses Exempt from Permits) , RMC Chapter 16.02.010 and Chapter 16.03.010 relating to establishing the criteria for the permitting and operation of emergency housing sites during a declared shelter crisis.

MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.2(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.2(a)--Shelter Crisis Annual Report
Steve Bade, Assistant City
Manager
Packet Pg. 26
Report to Redding City Council December 12, 2024
Re: 4.2(a)--Shelter Crisis Annual Report Page 2

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 8698 and RMC Chapter 18.17.020, subsection M., 14, the City Manager shall, not later than July 1st of the year following the declaration of a shelter crisis, develop a plan to address the shelter crisis . The plan includes the development of homeless shelters and permanent supportive housing as wel l as onsite supportive services. On June 21, 2022, the Council approved the City’s Shelter Crisis Action Plan (Action Plan).

Pursuant to California Government Code 8698.4 (a)(6), Action Plan results are to be reported to the State of California Senate Com mittee on Housing and the Assembly Committee on Housing and Community Development by January 1st of each year. This is the City’s third report to submit to the State of California.

Environmental Review

This is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”

Attachments
^2024 Shelter Crisis Annual Report to State 1-1-25
^Shelter Crisis Action Plan
^CA Code Section 8698.4
Packet Pg. 27
Packet Pg. 28
Attachment: ^2024 Shelter Crisis Annual Report to State 1-1-25 (4.2(a)--Shelter Crisis Annual Report) Packet Pg. 29
Attachment: ^2024 Shelter Crisis Annual Report to State 1-1-25 (4.2(a)--Shelter Crisis Annual Report) Packet Pg. 30
Attachment: ^2024 Shelter Crisis Annual Report to State 1-1-25 (4.2(a)--Shelter Crisis Annual Report) CITY OF REDDING
SHELTER CRISIS ACTION PLAN

California Government Code Section 8698, et seq., allows the governing body of a city to declare a Shelter Crisis when a significant number of persons are without the ability to obtain shelter, resulting in a threat to their health and safety.

The  2020  Shasta  County  Point‐in‐Time  Report  provided that  four  hundred  fifty‐four  (454)
individuals within the City of Redding “(“City”), including veterans, women, children, individuals with  disabilities,  senior  citizens,  and  other  vulnerable  groups,  are  experiencing  unsheltered homelessness within the City. Many of those unable to obtain shelter reside on the streets, in alleys  and  doorways,  along  the  Sacramento  River  and  its  tributaries,  and  in  unlawful encampments throughout the City. These individuals lack adequate sanitary facilities and are at risk from theft, crime, and extreme weather conditions, these conditions threaten the health and safety of the unsheltered population and likewise threaten the public health and safety of the public at large, contribute to a draw on public resources, and threaten the environmental health of the City’s waterways.

In  June  2021,  the  City  Council  adopted  a  resolution  declaring  that  the  City  of  Redding  has  a shelter crisis.  A shelter crisis proclaims that a significant number of people are without the ability to obtain shelter.   Following this declaration, the Council approved two Ordinances (2637 and 2638)  thereby  amending  Redding  Municipal  Code  (RMC)  Title  18  (Zoning),  Chapter  18.17, subsection 18.17.020 (Temporary Uses Exempt from Permits) and RMC Title 16, Chapter 16.02, subsection  16.02.010  and  Chapter  16.03,  subsection  16.03.010  relating  to  establishing  the criteria for permitting emergency housing sites and the operation of the same during a declared Shelter Crisis.

With  the  declaration  of  a  shelter  crisis  and  the  City  enacting  the  provisions  of  RMC  Section

18.17.020 and portions of Title 16, these actions allow organizations within the City to request permits issued by the City Council to set up and operate an Emergency Housing Site as defined in the RMC and in Appendix O of the California Building Code.   The Emergency Housing Sites will provide low barrier, sanitary shelter for up to 10 months, for those experiencing homelessness.

Wrap‐around supportive services will be provided to the occupants of the Emergency Housing Sites with the goal of moving those individuals into permanent housing.

Pursuant to California Government Code Section 8698 and RMC Chapter 18.17.020, subsection M., 14, the City Manager shall, not later than July 1st of the year following the declaration of any  shelter  crisis,  develop  a  plan  to  address  the  shelter  crisis  which  shall  include  the development  of  homeless  shelters  and  permanent  supportive  housing  as  well  as  onsite supportive services.

The implementation of Emergency Housing Sites within the City of Redding provides a resource to address the crisis of the unsheltered by
creating housing facilities offering short‐term shelter bridging the gap to transitional or permanent housing.   Considering Emergency Housing Sites Packet Pg. 31
Attachment: ^Shelter Crisis Action Plan (4.2(a)--Shelter Crisis Annual Report) will  play  an  important  role  in  addressing  unsheltered  needs  within  our  community,  staff developed the following Action Plan:

I. DEVELOP CITY INTERNAL PROCESS
a. City Manager’s Office – Program Administration
i. Application Process
ii. City Property Analysis
iii. Emergency Housing Site Permit Approval
iv. Communicate Progress to City Council and Community

b. Emergency Sleeping Cabin Approval
i. Building Official
ii. Fire Marshal
iii. Pallet
iv. CHYBA
c. Site Development
i. Permit Process Checklist
ii. Internal Team (Development Services, Fire, Public Works, REU, Housing and RPD)
d. Operations and Services Plan
i. Administrative Guidelines
ii. Guide, Advise and Monitor Operations and Services Plans iii. Collect Annual Report from each Emergency Housing Site

II. BUILD CAPACITY AND PARTNERSHIPS
a. Identify Funding Resources
b. Establish Partnerships
i. Non‐Profits (St. James, GNRM, United Way)
ii. CIRT
iii. Support Services
iv. Continuum of Care
c. Collect Data
d. Seek new capital and service funding opportunities

III. HOUSING RESOURCES
a. Emergency
i. City Property
ii. Private Property
b. Transitional
i. Participate with the Housing Inventory Count and identify available bed within our community.
ii. Facilitate partnerships that improve the number of beds available in our community.

Packet Pg. 32
Attachment: ^Shelter Crisis Action Plan (4.2(a)--Shelter Crisis Annual Report) c. Permanent
i. Tax Credit Developments
ii. CDBG‐DR‐MHP
iii. Pursue other federal and state funding sources.

IV.   REGULATORY/LEGISLATIVE
a. Annual Report
i. The  total  number  of  residents  in  homeless  shelters  within  the  city, county, or city and county.
ii. The total number of residents who have moved from a homeless shelter into permanent supportive housing within the city, county, or city and county.
iii. The estimated number of permanent supportive housing units. iv. The number of residents who have exited the system and are no longer in need of a homeless shelter or permanent supportive housing within the city, county, or city and county.
v. The number and bed capacity of new homeless shelters built pursuant to this section within the city, county, or city and county. The information regarding the bed capacity shall be included in reports due by January 1, 2022, and by January 1 of each year thereafter. Bed capacity shall not include the parking vehicle capacity of a homeless shelter on a parking lot  owned  or  leased  by  a  city,  county,  or  city  and  county  specifically identified  as  one  allowed  for  safe  parking  by  homeless  and  unstably housed individuals.
vi. New  actions  the  city,  county,  or  city  and  county  is  taking  under  the declared  shelter  crisis  to  better  serve  the  homeless  population  and  to reduce the number of people experiencing homelessness.
vii. The ordinance and any associated findings adopted by the city, county, or city and county pursuant to paragraph (2).
b. Monitor federal and state legislative actions, laws and resources.

Packet Pg. 33
Attachment: ^Shelter Crisis Action Plan (4.2(a)--Shelter Crisis Annual Report) Packet Pg. 34
Attachment: ^CA Code Section 8698.4 (4.2(a)--Shelter Crisis Annual Report) Packet Pg. 35
Attachment: ^CA Code Section 8698.4 (4.2(a)--Shelter Crisis Annual Report) Packet Pg. 36
Attachment: ^CA Code Section 8698.4 (4.2(a)--Shelter Crisis Annual Report) Packet Pg. 37
Attachment: ^CA Code Section 8698.4 (4.2(a)--Shelter Crisis Annual Report)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Resolution accepting a grant from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife for funding through the Sport Fish Restoration - Boating Access Program in the amount of $428,167; and authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute an agreement.

Fiscal Impact

The Sport Fish Restoration - Boating Access Grant Program (Boating Access Program) award of $428,167 will continue to fund four Community Services’ Parks Division staff positions (three Public Works Maintenance Workers and one Gardener position) specifically for river access facility maintenance during a one-year performance period of January 1, 2025 , through December 31, 2025 . A match of 25 percent ($142,722) of the total project cost ($ 570,889) is required and will be covered through in -kind services that are budgeted. The Boating Access Program grant is a reimbursement grant. Therefore, funds will be initially fronted by the General Fund and reimbursed on a quarterly basis.

If the grant is not renewed after 2025, the employees will work on maintenance efforts citywide.

There is no new fiscal impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could decline to adopt the Resolution for the Boating Access Program grant which would result in the General Fund, rather than grant funds , funding maintenance costs associated with multiple river access locations. Or, the Council could provide staff with alternate direction.

MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.6(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to Enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Grant Funds
Travis Menne, Director of
Community Services
Packet Pg. 38
Report to Redding City Council December 12, 2024
Re: 4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Grant Funds Page 2

Background/Analysis

For the second year in a row t he City has applied for a nd received funding from the Boating Access Program, a sub -program of the Sport Fish Restoration Act. This grant provides operations and maintenance funding, such as vegetation management, repairs, cleaning, and other routine tasks, for multiple river access facilities within the City. It does not fund any new capital improvement projects at the facilities.

The City Council accepted the grant award at their October 15, 2024 meeting. The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) has since notified staff that a resolution of the Council is required by their agency for participation in this program. If adopted by Council, staff will submit the resolution to CDFW which will initiate the issuance of a grant agreement. Adopting the resolution and the ma intenance projects w ill have no impact on the City’s lease with the Redding Rodeo Association, Advance Redding, or Turtle Bay Exploration Park.

A copy of the Notice of Award and Award Letter are attached and the agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney’s office.

Continuing these grant-funded efforts benefits the community and the City without using the General Fund to continue necessary upgrades and repairs to the City’s following facilities:

• Lake Redding Boat Ramp;
• John Reginato River Access;
• Turtle Bay Boat Ramp;
• Nur Pon Open Space and River Access;
• Turtle Bay East Open Space and River Access; and
• Kum Bay Xerel Open Space and River Access.

In the past year, notable projects funded by this program include:
• Upgrades to the Lake Redding Boat Ramp restrooms and land scaping. Staff r eplaced irrigation, plant ed shrubs, buil t a stone retention wall, and spread ground cover. As an area prone to vandalism, the upgrades have brought new life to the space and many of the regular users of the Sacramento River Trail have voiced their appreciation; and • John Reginato Boat Ramp improvements including a restroom remodel and enhanced vegetation management along the Anglers Trail. The extra maintenance efforts have improved the overall experience for hikers, fisherman, and nature enthusiasts.

Environmental Review

These are routine maintenance items, and the subsequent California Environmental Quality Act findings are included with the 2023 -2025 Biennial Budget consideration . N o further action is required.

Packet Pg. 39
Report to Redding City Council December 12, 2024
Re: 4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Grant Funds Page 3

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10 -year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”

Attachments
^Resolution
Previous Staff Report - November 7, 2023, item 4.6(c)
Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00
Location Map for Boating Access Grant
G2498104_Redding_CDFW-SFRA_Award_Letter
Packet Pg. 40
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING THE GRANT ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF A

GRANT AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

FISH AND WILDLIFE SPORT FISH RESTORATION ACT BOATING

ACCESS PROGRAM FOR THE CITY OF REDDING BOATING AND

FISHING ACCESS MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONS PROJECT

WHEREAS, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Sport Fish Restoration Act Boating Access Program has provided funds in the amount of $428,167 for the project shown above; and

WHEREAS, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife has been delegated the responsibility for the administration of this grant program, establishing necessary procedures; and

WHEREAS, said procedures established by t he California Department of Fish and Wildlife require a resolution certifying the approval by the potential grantee’s governing board before execution of the grant agreement; and

WHEREAS, the City of Redding will implement the Boating and Fishing Access Maintenance and Operations Project; and

WHEREAS, the City of Redding will accept the funds and enter into an agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife to carry out the project; and

WHEREAS, the City of Redding has the legal authority and is authorized to enter into a funding agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife; and

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

1. The City of Redding City accepts the $428,167 in Sport Fish Restoration Act Boating Access Program funds.

2. Pursuant and subject to all of the terms and provisions of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife , the City of Redding City Manager , or designee is hereby authori zed and directed to enter into an agreement with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and receive the grant funds, any amendments thereto , with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and take such other actions necessary or appropriate t o maintain grant funding.

3. The City of Redding City Manager, or designee is hereby authorized and directed to submit any required documents, funding requests, and reports required to maintain grant funding.

4. Certifies that the project will comply with any laws and regulations including, but not limited to, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), legal requirements for Packet Pg. 41
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Grant Funds) building codes, health and safety codes, the California Labor Code, disabled access laws, and, that prior to commencement of the project, all applicable permits will have been obtained.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 17th day of December, 2024, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

____________________________________
JACK MUNNS, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:

_________________________________ ____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 42
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Grant Funds)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve and authorize the following:
(1) Approve and ratify the City of Redding Community Services Department’s submittal of a Boating Access Program grant application in an amount not to exceed $600,000 to provide continued funding assistance for boat ramp and fishing facility operations and maintenance at multiple river access locations; and
(2) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the grant, appropriate funds should the grant be awarded, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project.

Fiscal Impact

If awarded, t he Boating Access Program grant will continue funding four Parks Division staff positions specifically for river access facility maintenance. The applica tion will request up to $600,000 to fund three Public Works Maintenance Workers, and one Gardener position. A match of 25 percent ($ 200,000) of the total project cost ($ 800,000) is required and will be covered through in-kind labor services already budgeted. If the grant is not renewed, the employees will be re-assigned to vacant positions or separated during the probationary period.

There is no new fiscal impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action

Due to timing constraints between the announcement and the grant program deadline, staff submitted the application on November 3, 2023. The City Council (Council) could decline to ratify staff’s submission of the Boating Access Program grant application and direct staff to withdraw the grant application. This action will result in a missed opportunity to continue to fund maintenance costs associated with multiple river access locations. Or, Council could provide staff with alternate direction.

MEETING DATE: November 7, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.6(c)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(c)--Ratification of Boating Access Program Grant Application for Sport Fish Restoration Grant Program
Travis Menne, Director of
Community Services
Packet Pg. 43
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - November 7, 2023, item 4.6(c) (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Report to Redding City Council October 30, 2023
Re: 4.6(c)--Authorize Grant Application for Sport Fish Restoration Grant Program Page 2

Background/Analysis

Grants within the Boating Access Program, a sub-program of the Sport Fish Restoration Grant Program, can fund a broad range of river access facilities and associated amenities that benefit recreational boaters. These grants are available to State Fish and Wildlife Agencies that sometimes partner with local governments, other state agencies, or non -governmental organizations to ensure public access to State -controlled waters. Though many development grants are available for parks, trails, and facilities, those that fund maintenance are rarely available.

In January 2023, the Redding office of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) partnered with the City of Redding (City) to apply for the funds, thereby recognizing the value of the facilities to the sport fishing community, as well a s the State’s previous investment in the development of these facilities, and the associated burden of maintenance costs. Staff recently executed a round one Boating Access Program grant contract with CDFW for $451,281 to fund three new Public Works Mainte nance Worker positions and one new Gardener position for additional maintenance efforts. This grant funds these positions for one year.

To continue the enhanced maintenance effort s, staff applied for round two of the program. If awarded, the Parks Divisi on’s additional funding will support further vegetation management, repairs, cleaning, and other routine tasks. Accepting the grant award will not fund capital improvement projects at any of the facilities, and the recommended actions have no impact on the City’s lease with the Redding Rodeo Association, Advance Redding, or Turtle Bay Exploration Park.

The application seeks funding for operations and maintenance at the following six facilities:

• Lake Redding Boat Ramp;
• John Reginato River Access;
• Turtle Bay Boat Ramp;
• Nur Pon Open Space and River Access;
• Turtle Bay East Open Space and River Access; and
• Kum Bay Xerel Open Space and River Access.

Environmental Review

These are routine maintenance items and are not considered a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act. No further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10 -year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspect s of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” • Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attr act new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 44
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - November 7, 2023, item 4.6(c) (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Report to Redding City Council October 30, 2023
Re: 4.6(c)--Authorize Grant Application for Sport Fish Restoration Grant Program Page 3

Attachments
^Location Map - River Access Facilities
Packet Pg. 45
Attachment: Previous Staff Report - November 7, 2023, item 4.6(c) (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and (Subject to the availability of funds and satisfactory progress of the project):
a. DEDUCTION
b. ADDITIONAL COSTS
c. MATCHING
d. OTHER RESEARCH (Add / Deduct Option)
e. OTHER (See REMARKS)
c. This award notice including terms and conditions, if any, noted below under REMARKS. d. Federal administrative requirements, cost principles and audit requirements applicable to this grant.

In the event there are conflicting or otherwise inconsistent policies applicable to the grant, the above order of precedence shall prevail. Acceptance of the grant terms and conditions is acknowledged by the grantee when funds are drawn or otherwise obtained from the grant payment system.

REMARKS (Other Terms and Conditions Attached - Yes No) d. AMOUNT OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE THIS ACTION
c. Less Cumulative Prior Award(s) This Budget Period
a. d.
b. e.
c. f.

13. Total Federal Funds Awarded to Date for Project Period

14. RECOMMENDED FUTURE SUPPORT
Salaries and Wages
Fringe Benefits ……………….................$

TOTAL DIRECT COSTS

INDIRECT COSTS

TOTAL APPROVED BUDGET
Federal Share
Non-Federal Share
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
l.

FINANCIAL ACCT

17. VENDOR CODE

AMT OF FIN ASST START DATE
18b. DUNS

END DATE

19. CONG. DIST.

TAS ACCT
.…...….…..$
…………………………...$
…………………………...$
…………………………...$
…………………………...$
…………………………...$
…………………….……..$
m.
n.
m)

YEAR TOTAL DIRECT COSTS YEAR TOTAL DIRECT COSTS

ALL AMOUNTS ARE SHOWN IN USD
II Total project costs including grant funds and all other financial participation b. Less Unobligated Balance From Prior Budget Periods

11. APPROVED BUDGET (Excludes Direct Assistance) 12. AWARD COMPUTATION I Financial Assistance from the Federal Awarding Agency Only a. Amount of Federal Financial Assistance (from item 11 ALTERNATIVES:

15. PROGRAM INCOME SHALL BE USED IN ACCORD WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING

ON THE ABOVE TITLED PROJECT AND IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS INCORPORATED EITHER DIRECTLY OR BY REFERENCE IN THE FOLLOWING:

16. THIS AWARD IS BASED ON AN APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO, AND AS APPROVED BY, THE FEDERAL AWARDING AGENCY a. The grant program legislation .
b. The grant program regulation s.
10b. FEDERAL PROJECT OFFICER10a. GRANTEE AUTHORIZING OFFICIAL

NOTICE OF AWARD
1a. SUPERSEDES AWARD NOTICE dated
Originating MCA #
AUTHORIZATION (Legislation/Regulations)

4. GRANT NO.
5a. ACTION TYPE

6. PROJECT PERIOD

7. BUDGET PERIOD
9a. GRANTEE NAME AND ADDRESS 9b. GRANTEE PROJECT DIRECTOR

MM/DD/YYYY

MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY

MM/DD/YYYY MM/DD/YYYY

1. DATE ISSUED

2. CFDA NO.

3. ASSISTANCE TYPE

8. From Through
From Through
4a. FAIN

5. TYPE OF AWARD
except that any additions or restrictions previously imposed remain in effect unless specifically rescinded
……………….................$
Total Personnel Costs
Equipment
Supplies
Travel
Construction
Other
Contractual

TITLE OF PROJECT (OR PROGRAM)
LINE# PO LINE DESCRIPTION
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
18a. UEI
Dingell-Johnson Sport Fish Restoration Act—Sport Fish Restoration (16 U.S.C. §777 et seq., except §§777e-1 and g-1)
07/16/2024
07/15/2024
01/01/2025
12/31/2025
01/01/2025
12/31/2025
Boating and Fishing Access Maintenance and Operations - Redding, CA(G2498104)

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00

0.00 0.00
570,889.00

0.00 570,889.00

0.00 570,889.00
142,722.00
428,167.00

0.00 428,167.00
2 3
4 b

ADMIN AMENDMENT - NOA REVISION - ADD PROJECT TITLE
II

15.605 - Sport Fish Restoration
Ms. Jennifer Wolfrom
1416 9TH STREET 12TH FLOOR
SACRAMENTO, CA, 95814-5515
Phone: 916.445.3694

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE
1416 9th St Fl 12
Sacramento, CA, 95814-5515
Erika Lee
715 P street
Sacramento, CA, 95814-5515
Phone: 916-207-3987
Mr. Shawn Milar
511 Gardners Road
Monterey, CA, 93940
Phone: 8316563639

0.00 06
808322358
0070057965
Formula Grant

0.00 428,167.00
6 7
Becky Miller, Regional Manager
2800 COTTAGE WAY, W-1916
SACRAMENTO, CA, 95825
Phone: 916-978-6185
GRANTS MANAGEMENT OFFICIAL:
5 428,167.00
F24AF02434-01
F24AF02434
Post Award Amendment
Other
1 0051051779-00010
$0.00
01/01/2025
12/31/2025
8151
Freshwater Boating Access
UVKGJ6U1SEG3
Packet Pg. 46
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Federal Financial Report Cycle
Reporting Period Start Date Reporting Period End Date Reporting Type Reporting Period Due Date 01/01/2025 12/31/2025 Final 04/30/2026
Performance Progress Report Cycle
Reporting Period Start Date Reporting Period End Date Reporting Type Reporting Period Due Date 01/01/2025 12/31/2025 Final 04/30/2026

SCOPE OF WORK
All conditions and provisions from the original grant award letter and any amendments remain in effect.

Project Description
The Service hereby incorporates the recipient’s application submitted to and approved by the Service into these award terms and conditions.

Your organization’s application for Federal financial assistance amendment titled “Boating and Fishing Access Maintenance and Operations - Redding, CA(G2498104)” submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is approved effective July 16, 2024.  This award is amended as follows: ADMIN

AMENDMENT - NOA REVISION - ADD PROJECT TITLE

1. Terms and Conditions
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
General Award Terms and Conditions
Recipients of U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) grant and cooperative agreement awards (hereafter referred to as ‘awards’) are subject to the terms and conditions incorporated into their Notice of Award either by direct citation or by reference to Federal regulations; program legislation or regulation; and special award terms and conditions. Award terms and conditions are applicable unless and until the USFWS removes or revises them in written notice to the recipient. The Service will make such changes by issuing a written notice that describes the change and provides the effective date.

Recipients indicate their acceptance of an award by starting work, drawing down funds, or accepting the award via electronic means. Recipient acceptance of an award carries with it the responsibility to be aware of and comply with all terms and conditions applicable to the award. Recipients are responsible for ensuring that their subrecipients and contractors are aware of and comply with applicable award statutes, regulations, and terms and conditions. Recipient failure to comply with award terms and conditions can result in the Service taking one or more of the remedies and actions described in Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) §§200.339—343.

A library of the Service's general award terms and conditions with embedded links to all regulations is available on the Service’s website at: https://www.fws.gov/library/collections/financial-assistance-general-award-terms-and-conditions. Refer to the general terms and conditions in this library in effect as of the signature date on your award. See also the Department of the Interior’s General Award Terms and Conditions on their website at: https://www.doi.gov/grants/doi-standard-terms-and-conditions.

Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements These requirements and cost principles are applicable to all awards except those to individuals receiving the award separate from

1. 2 of
07/16/2024
F24AF02434-01
2 PAGE DATE ISSUED
GRANT NO.

NOTICE OF AWARD (Continuation Sheet)
8 Packet Pg. 47
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive any business or organization they may own or operate. Foreign public entities and foreign organizations must comply with special considerations and requirements specific to their entity type, unless otherwise stated in this section. Foreign public entities must comply with those for states.
2 CFR Part 200, Subparts A—D, as supplemented by 2 CFR Part 1402 Foreign public entities must follow payment procedures in 2 CFR §200.305(b). For foreign public entities and foreign organizations, the requirements in 2 CFR §§200.321—323 do not apply.

Appendix XII to 2 CFR Part 200—Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters Applicable to awards with a total Federal share of more than $500,000 except for awards of any amount to foreign public entities. 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart E—Cost Principles
Applicable to all domestic and foreign non-Federal entities except non-profit organizations identified in Appendix VIII to 2 CFR Part 200. Non-Federal entities include for-profit organizations. 48 CFR Subpart 31.2—Contracts with Commercial Organizations Applicable to non-profit organizations identified in Appendix VIII to 2 CFR Part 200.

Indirect Cost Proposals
Requirements for development and submission of indirect cost rate proposals are contained in Appendix III (Institutions of Higher Education), Appendix IV (Nonprofit organizations), and Appendix VII (States, local government agencies, and Indian tribes) to 2 CFR Part 200. See also the DOI negotiated indirect cost rate deviation policies at 2 CFR §1402.414. For-profit entities should contact the DOI National Business Center, Office of Indirect Cost Rate Services at: https://ibc.doi.gov/ICS/indirect-cost. 2 CFR Part 200, Subpart F—Audit Requirements
Applicable to U.S. states, local governments, Indian tribes, institutions of higher education, and nonprofit organizations. Not applicable to foreign public entities, foreign organizations, or for-profit entities.

Statutory and National Policy Requirements
These requirements are applicable to all awards, including those to individuals, for-profits, foreign public entities, and foreign organizations, unless otherwise stated in this section.

Appendix A to 2 CFR Part 25—Universal Identifier and System for Award Management Not applicable to individuals or any entity exempted by the awarding bureau or office prior to award per 2 CFR §25.110(c)(2) and bureau or office policy.

Appendix A to 2 CFR Part 170—Award term for reporting subaward and executive compensation Not applicable to individuals. See 2 CFR 170 for other exceptions. 2 CFR §175.15—Award Term for Trafficking in Persons
Applicable to private entities as defined in 2 CFR §175.25(d), states, local governments, and Indian tribes. Applicable to foreign 3 of
07/16/2024
F24AF02434-01
3 PAGE DATE ISSUED
GRANT NO.

NOTICE OF AWARD (Continuation Sheet)
8 Packet Pg. 48
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive public entities if funding could be provided to a private entity as a subrecipient under the award. 2 CFR Part 184—Buy America Preference for Infrastructure Projects None of the funds under a Federal award may be obligated for an infrastructure project unless all the iron, steel, manufactured products, and construction materials used in the project are produced in the United States, unless subject to an approved waiver.

This part applies to an entire infrastructure project even if funded by Federal and non-Federal funds under one or more awards.

Recipients must include this preference in all subawards, contracts, and purchase orders related to infrastructure projects under Federal awards.  Service awards subject to this preference will include a Buy America Provision for Infrastructure. 2 CFR Part 1400—Nonprocurement Debarment and Suspension All recipients must ensure they do not enter into any covered transaction with an excluded or disqualified participant or principal.

See also 2 CFR Part 180—OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement). 2 CFR §180.215 defines nonprocurement transactions that are not covered transactions. 2 CFR Part 1401—Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance) Not applicable to foreign public entities or foreign organizations. 43 CFR Part 18—New Restrictions on Lobbying
Recipients are prohibited from using any federally appropriated funds (annually appropriated or continuing appropriations) or matching funds under a Federal award to pay any person for lobbying in connection with the award. Lobbying is influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any U.S. agency, a Member of the U.S. Congress, or an officer or employee of a Member of the U.S. Congress in connection with the award. 41 U.S.C. §4712—Whistleblower Protection for Contractor and Grantee Employees 41 U.S.C. §6306—Prohibition on Members of Congress Making contracts with Federal Government Mandatory Disclosures
Failure to make required disclosures may result in any of the remedies for noncompliance described in 2 CFR §200.339, including suspension or debarment (see also 2 CFR Part 180).

Conflicts of interest: Per 2 CFR §1402.112, non-Federal entities and their employees must take appropriate steps to avoid conflicts of interest in their responsibilities under or with respect to Federal financial assistance agreements. In the procurement of supplies, equipment, construction, and services by recipients and by subrecipients, the provisions in 2 CFR §200.318 apply. Non- Federal entities, including applicants for financial assistance awards, must disclose in writing any conflict of interest to the DOI awarding agency or pass-through entity in accordance with 2 CFR §200.112. Recipients must establish internal controls that include, at a minimum, procedures to identify, disclose, and mitigate or eliminate identified conflicts of interest. The recipient is responsible for notifying the Service Project Officer identified in their notice of award in writing of any conflicts of interest that may arise during the life of the award, including those that reported by subrecipients. The Service will examine each disclosure to determine whether a significant potential conflict exists and, if it does, work with the applicant or recipient to develop an appropriate resolution. Failure to resolve conflicts of interest in a manner that satisfies the government may be cause for termination of the award.

Lobbying: If the Federal share of the award is more than $100,000, recipients must disclose making or agreeing to make any payment using non-appropriated funds for lobbying in connection with the award. To make such disclosures, recipients must 4 of
07/16/2024
F24AF02434-01
4 PAGE DATE ISSUED
GRANT NO.

NOTICE OF AWARD (Continuation Sheet)
8 Packet Pg. 49
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive complete and submit the SF-LLL, “Disclosure of Lobbying Activities” form to the USFWS. This form is available at: https://www.grants.gov/forms/forms-repository/post-award-reporting-forms. For more information on when additional submission of this form is required, see 43 CFR, Subpart 18.100. These restrictions are not applicable to such expenditures by Indian tribe, tribal organization, or any other Indian organization that is specifically permitted by other Federal law.

Other Mandatory Disclosures: Recipients and subrecipients must disclose, in a timely manner, in writing to the Service Project Officer identified in their notice of award or pass-through entity all violations of Federal criminal law involving fraud, bribery, or gratuity violations potentially affecting the Federal award. Non-Federal entities subject to the 2 CFR 200, Appendix XII—Award Term and Condition for Recipient Integrity and Performance Matters are required to report certain civil, criminal, or administrative proceedings to SAM.

National Policy Encouragements
Executive Order 13043—Increasing Seat Belt Use in the United States Non-Federal entities are encouraged to adopt and enforce on-the-job seat belt policies and programs for their employees when operating company-owned, rented, or personally owned vehicles. Individuals are encouraged to use seat belts while driving in connection with award activities.

E. O. 13513—Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving Non-Federal entities are encouraged to adopt and enforce policies that ban text messaging while driving, including conducting initiatives of the type described in section 3(a) of the order. Individuals are encouraged to not text message while driving in connection with award activities.

AWARD CONDITIONS
Office of Conservation Investment Wildlife Restoration / Sport Fish Restoration Match The federal share of the total project costs cannot exceed 75%. The Grant Recipient is eligible to request Federal obligated funds up to but not in excess of an amount equal to 75% of the total project expenditures. See also 2 CFR §200.306.

1. Office of Conservation Investment Freshwater/Marine Split This grant is funded with 100% Freshwater Sport Fish Restoration funds and 0% Marine Sport Fish Restoration funds.

2. Indirect Cost Restrictions
The Service conditionally approves the proposed indirect costs on the final approved budget incorporated into this award. The Recipient is prohibited from charging indirect costs to this award until the Recipient provides a copy of their approved negotiated indirect cost rate agreement to the Service Project Officer identified on this notice of award.  The Recipient must submit their indirect cost rate proposal to their cognizant agency for indirect costs within 90 calendar days past the award period of performance start date.  In the event the recipient does not establish an approved rate by the award period of performance end date, the recipient must contact the Service Project Officer identified on this notice of award to discuss the situation and determine what budget revisions may be required.  If the recipient submitted their rate agreement in a timely manner but the cognizant agency delayed processing it, the recipient should provide relevant details to the Service Project Officer.

3. Office of Conservation Investment Cost Accounting 4. 5 of
07/16/2024
F24AF02434-01
5 PAGE DATE ISSUED
GRANT NO.

NOTICE OF AWARD (Continuation Sheet)
8 Packet Pg. 50
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Cost accounting is at the Grant/project/subaccount level.

Office of Conservation Investment TRACS Grant Entry
The recipient is responsible for entering grant and project statement information for this award into the Service’s electronic performance reporting system – TRACS (https://tracs.fws.gov). This information must be entered in TRACS within 60 calendar days of the latter: (a) period of performance start date; or (b) the date the award was approved. The grant and project statement information entered in TRACS must be consistent with the approved Project Statement (narrative) in GrantSolutions. If you need assistance, please contact the Office of Conservation Investment Federal Project Officer identified in this Notice of Award.

5. Other Program- or Project-Specific Terms and Conditions 2 CFR 200.407   Prior written approval (prior approval).

Under any given Federal award, the reasonableness and allocability of certain items of costs may be difficult to determine. In order to avoid subsequent disallowance or dispute based on unreasonableness or nonallocability, the non-Federal entity may seek the prior written approval of the cognizant agency for indirect costs or the Federal awarding agency in advance of the incurrence of special or unusual costs.

Prior written approval should include the timeframe or scope of the agreement. The absence of prior written approval on any element of cost will not, in itself, affect the reasonableness or allocability of that element, unless prior approval is specifically required for allowability as described under certain circumstances in the following sections of this part:
(a) §200.201 Use of grant agreements (including fixed amount awards), cooperative agreements, and contracts, paragraph (b)(5); Changes to principle investigator, project leader, project partner, or scope of efforts.
(b) §200.306 Cost sharing or matching; Unrecovered Indirect Cost used as match.

6. SPECIAL TERMS AND REQUIREMENTS
Individuals Hiring Contractors
The Recipient has an obligation to protect themselves from potential liability when hiring any contractor to perform work activities approved under this award on property owned by the Recipient by checking references and ensuring that any contractor hired is licensed, bonded, and has valid employee insurance coverage for events of injury or bodily harm.  In accordance with 2 CFR 180, for any contract expected to total $25,000 or more the Recipient must confirm that the contractor is not suspended or debarred from receiving Federal funds.  The Recipient does this by: 1) checking SAM Exclusions, 2) collecting a certification from the contractor; or 3) adding a clause or condition to the contract.  To check SAM Exclusions, go to www.SAM.gov.  Search for entities by their UEI number.  Search for principal participants by their names.  Search for contractors by their business names.  If an exclusion is found that prohibits the entity from receiving Federal award funds, the Recipient is prohibited from entering into a subaward with that entity.

1. Individuals Issuing Subawards
In accordance with 2 CFR 180, before issuing any subaward of any amount the Recipient must confirm that the subrecipient and principals or the contractor are/is not suspended or debarred from receiving Federal funds.  The Recipient does this by: 1) checking SAM Exclusions, 2) collecting a certification from the subrecipient; or 3) adding a clause or condition to the subaward.

To check SAM Exclusions, go to www.SAM.gov.  Search for entities by their UEI number.  Search for principal participants by

2. 6 of
07/16/2024
F24AF02434-01
6 PAGE DATE ISSUED
GRANT NO.

NOTICE OF AWARD (Continuation Sheet)
8 Packet Pg. 51
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive their names.  Search for contractors by their business names.  If an exclusion is found that prohibits the entity from receiving Federal award funds, the Recipient is prohibited from entering into a subaward with that entity. 2 CFR § 200.331 Subrecipient and contractor determinations. 2 CFR § 200.332 - Requirements for pass-through entities.

PAYMENTS
Domestic Recipients Enrolled in Treasury’s ASAP System
The recipient will request payments under this award in the U.S. Treasury’s Automated Standard Application for Payment (ASAP) system. When requesting payment in ASAP, your Payment Requestor will be required to enter an Account ID. The number assigned to this award is the partial Account ID in ASAP. When entering the Account ID in ASAP, the Payment Requestor should enter the award number identified in the notice of award, followed by a percent sign (%). Refer to the ASAP.gov Help menu for detailed instructions on requesting payments in ASAP.

1. BUDGET AND PROGRAM REVISIONS
Office of Conservation Investment Budget and Program Revisions The recipient is permitted to re-budget within the approved direct cost budget to meet unanticipated requirements and may make limited program changes to the approved project.  However, certain types of post-award changes in budgets and projects shall require the prior written approval of the Service.  Refer to 2 CFR 200.308 for additional information on the types of changes that require prior written approval.

1. REPORT
Final Reports
The recipient must liquidate all obligations incurred under the award and submit a final financial report in GrantSolutions no later than 120 calendar days after the award period of performance end date.  The GrantSolutions financial report data entry fields are the same as those on the SF-425, Federal Financial Report form,  https://www.grants.gov/web/grants/forms/post-award-reporting- forms.html . See also our instructional video on “Completing the Federal Financial Report (SF425) https://fawiki.fws.gov/display/VLSV#VirtualLearningSeriesVideosHome-CompletingtheFederalFinancialReport(SF- 425)
The recipient must submit a final performance report no later than 120 calendar days after the award period of performance end date.  Performance reports must contain: 1) a comparison of actual accomplishments with the goals and objectives of the award as detailed in the approved scope of work; 2) a description of reasons why established goals were not met, if appropriate; and 3) any other pertinent information relevant to the project results.  Please include the Service award number on all reports.

The recipient must follow the final Federal Financial Report and the final Performance Report reporting period end dates and due dates provided in GrantSolutions. The final reporting due dates are available by signing in to GrantSolutions and selecting the menu for Reports>Federal Financial Report or Reports>FPR.

1. 7 of
07/16/2024
F24AF02434-01
7 PAGE DATE ISSUED
GRANT NO.

NOTICE OF AWARD (Continuation Sheet)
8 Packet Pg. 52
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Reporting Due Date Extensions
Reporting due dates may be extended for an award upon request to the Service Project Officer identified in the notice of award.

The request should be sent by selecting the award in GrantSolutions and selecting send message. The message must include the type of report to be extended, the requested revised due date, and a justification for the extension.  The Service may approve an additional extension if justified by a catastrophe that significantly impairs the award Recipient’s operations.  The recipient must submit reporting due date extension requests through GrantSolutions to the Service Project Officer identified in their notice of award before the original due date. The Service Project Officer will respond to the recipient after approval or denial of the extension request.

2. Significant Developments Reports
See 2 CFR §200.329(e).  Events may occur between the scheduled performance reporting dates that have significant impact upon the supported activity. In such cases, recipients are required to notify the Service in writing as soon as the recipient becomes aware of any problems, delays, or adverse conditions that will materially impair the ability to meet the objective of the Federal award. This disclosure must include a statement of any corrective action(s) taken or contemplated, and any assistance needed to resolve the situation. The recipient should also notify the Service in writing of any favorable developments that enable meeting time schedules and objectives sooner or at less cost than anticipated or producing more or different beneficial results than originally planned.

3. Office of Conservation Investment TRACS Reporting
The recipient is responsible for entering interim (if required) and final performance report information for this award into the Service’s electronic performance reporting system – TRACS (https://tracs.fws.gov) and attaching those reports from TRACS into GrantSolutions by the report due date(s) as specified in GrantSolutions. Performance information entered in TRACS must provide quantitative outputs to the approved Standard Objectives and narrative responses to the following questions. If the award includes multiple project statements, the recipient must answer these questions for each project statement. If you need assistance, please contact the Office of Conservation Investment Federal Project Officer identified in this Notice of Award.

1. What progress has been made towards completing the objective(s) of the project?

2. Please describe and justify any changes in the implementation of your objective(s) or approach(es).

3. If applicable, please share if the project resulted in any unexpected benefits, promising practices, new understandings, cost efficiencies, management recommendations, or lessons learned.

4. For survey projects only: If applicable, does this project continue work from a previous award? If so, how do the current results compare to prior results? (Recipients may elect to add attachments such as tables, figures, or graphs to provide further detail when answering this question).

5. If applicable, identify and attach selected publications, photographs, screenshots of websites, or other documentation (including articles in popular literature, scientific literature, or other public information products) that have resulted from this project that highlight the accomplishments of the project.

6. Is this a project that you wish to highlight for communication purposes?

7. For CMS State fish and wildlife agencies only: If the grant is a CMS, has the agency submitted an update report every 3 years detailing the CMS components: (a) inventory and scanning; (b) strategic plan; (c) operational plan; and (d) evaluation and control have been reviewed and summaries included which provide detailed review results and recommendations?

4. 8 of
07/16/2024
F24AF02434-01
8 PAGE DATE ISSUED
GRANT NO.

NOTICE OF AWARD (Continuation Sheet)
8 Packet Pg. 53
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive

AWARD ATTACHMENTS
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH & WILDLIFE F24AF02434-01
SF 424 - AFA1.

Budget

2. Project Narr

3. Map

4. Match 1

5. Match 2

6. Packet Pg. 54
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive xxxxx 6/3/24
xxx 6400
BA CA BA Maint Ops
JFJ
Packet Pg. 55
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Packet Pg. 56
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Packet Pg. 57
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive NOTE: Cells highlighted in light blue are locked and cannot be edited. G2498104 2024-25 2025-26 TOTAL

PERSONAL SERVICES POSITION

NUMBER INCUMBENT AMOUNT AMOUNT AMOUNT
Permanent Staff
N/A $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
Permanent Intermittent Staff
N/A $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0
Temporary Help (Sci Aides) $0 $0 $0
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES $0 $0 $0

OPERATING EXPENSES
General Expenses $0 $0 $0
Facilties $0 $0 $0
Minor Equipment (Equipment under $5K per item) $0 $0 $0 Travel/Training $0 $0 $0
C&PS - Interdepartmental $0 $0 $0
C&PS - External $428,167 $0 $428,167
Task 1 $0 $0 $0
Task 2 $0 $0 $0
Task 3 $0 $0 $0
Task 4 $0 $0 $0
Waste Removal $0 $0 $0
Electricity $0 $0 $0
Water $0 $0 $0
Utilities $0 $0 $0
Major Equipment (Equipment over $5K per item & IT goods) $0 $0 $0 Capital Expenditures $0 $0 $0
Gas/Diesel Fuel $0 $0 $0
Vehicle/Equipment Maintenance & Repair $0 $0 $0
Vehicle/Equipment Parts & Supplies $0 $0 $0
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $428,167 $0 $428,167
TOTAL OE&E/PERSONAL SERVICES $428,167 $0 $428,167
*INDIRECT COST RATE (less overhead for Major Equipment, Contracts and P I) $0 $0 $0 *Approved FY 23/24 ICRP. The future FY(s) proposed ICRP will be submitted to the U.S 18.94% 18.94% 18.94% TOTAL FEDERAL SHARE $428,167 $0 $428,167
Federal Share (100%) $428,167 $0 $428,167
State Share
(Third Party) $142,722 $0 $142,722
TOTAL PROJECT COST $570,889 $0 $570,889
Boating and Fishing Access Maintenance and Operations - Redding, CA 100% Freshwater Benefit / % Marine Benefit
Packet Pg. 58
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive *NOTE: Cells highlighted in light blue are locked and cannot be edited. G2498104 2024-25

PERSONAL SERVICES POSITION

NUMBER PY INCUMBENT ANNUAL
SALARY
GRANT

SALARY BENEFITS MSA
Increase % AMOUNT
Permanent Staff
N/A N/A 0.0 N/A $0 $0 0.000% 0.00% $0

0.0 Total Permanent Staff Salaries $0
Permanent Intermittent Staff Hours $/Hr.

N/A N/A 0.0 N/A $0 $0 0.00% 0.00% $0
Total Permanent Intermittent Salaries $0
Temporary Help (Sci Aides) N/A #DIV/0! $0.00 $0 56.448% 0.00% $0 #REF!
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

OPERATING EXPENSES
General Expenses $0
Facilities $0
Minor Equipment Equipment under $5K per item $0
Travel/Training $0
C&PS - Interdepartmental $0
C&PS - External $428,167
Task 1 $0
Task 2 $0
Task 3 $0
Task 4 $0
Waste Removal $0
Electricity $0
Water $0
Utilities $0
Major Equipment Equipment over $5K per item $0
Capital Expenditures $0
Gas/Diesel Fuel $0
Vehicle/Equipment Maintenance & Repair $0
Vehicle/Equipment Parts & Supplies $0
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $428,167
TOTAL OE&E/PERSONAL SERVICES $428,167
*INDIRECT COST RATE (less overhead for Major Equipment, Contracts and P I) 18.94% $0 *Approved FY 23/24 ICRP. The future FY(s) proposed ICRP will be submitted to the U.S. Department of t he Interior and is subject to change.

TOTAL FEDERAL SHARE $428,167
Federal Share (100%) $428,167
State Share (Third Party) $142,722
TOTAL PROJECT COST $570,889
Boating and Fishing Access Maintenance and Operations - Redding, CA 100% Freshwater Benefit / % Marine Benefit
Packet Pg. 59
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive *NOTE: Cells highlighted in light blue are locked and cannot be edited. G2498104 2025-26

PERSONAL SERVICES POSITION

NUMBER PY INCUMBENT ANNUAL
SALARY
GRANT

SALARY BENEFITS MSA
Increase % AMOUNT
Permanent Staff
N/A N/A 0.0 N/A $0 $0 0.000% 0.00% $0

0.0 Total Permanent Staff Salaries $0
Permanent Intermittent Staff Hours $/Hr.

N/A N/A 0 N/A $0 $0 0.00% 0.00% $0
Total Permanent Intermittent Salaries $0
Temporary Help (Sci Aides) N/A #DIV/0! $0.00 $0 56.448% 0.00% $0 #REF!
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

OPERATING EXPENSES
General Expenses $0
Facilities $0
Minor Equipment Equipment under $5K per item $0
Travel/Training $0
C&PS - Interdepartmental $0
C&PS - External $0
Task 1 $0
Task 2 $0
Task 3 $0
Task 4 $0
Waste Removal $0
Electricity $0
Water $0
Utilities $0
Major Equipment Equipment over $5K per item $0
Capital Expenditures $0
Gas/Diesel Fuel $0
Vehicle/Equipment Maintenance & Repair $0
Vehicle/Equipment Parts & Supplies $0
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $0
TOTAL OE&E/PERSONAL SERVICES $0
*INDIRECT COST RATE (less overhead for Major Equipment, Contracts and PI) 18.94% $0 *Approved FY 23/24 ICRP. The future FY(s) proposed ICRP will be submitted to the U.S. Department of the Interior and is subject to change.

TOTAL FEDERAL SHARE $0
Federal Share (100%) $0
State Share (Third Party) $0
TOTAL PROJECT COST $0
Boating and Fishing Access Maintenance and Operations - Redding, CA 100% Freshwater Benefit / % Marine Benefit
Packet Pg. 60
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive G2498104
01/01/2025 – 12/31/2025

1 of 6
Boating and Fishing Access Maintenance and Operations - Redding, CA

INTRODUCTION: The City of Redding operates three motorized boat ramp facilities and three non-motorized facilities along the Sacramento River. The Sacramento Riv er through the City of Redding offers some of the most pristine fisheries in the State of California and the United States of America. Many residents use these access points regularly as do our many professional guides and their customers. The City o f Redding seeks to continue funding through the Sport Fish Restoration Act (SFRA) p rogram the maintenance and operations of six (6) City owned river access facilities. These facilities offer motorized and non-motorized launch locations, fishing areas, pa rking and other support amenities to access the Sacramento River, home to several runs of salmon , including the federal and state Environmental Species Act (ESA) listed Sacramento River winter-run Chinook salmon. The City was awarded an FY 23/24 SFRA grant (Boating and Fishing Access Maintenance and Operations – Redding, CA G2398053/ F23AF01256) to fund additional maintenance staff at these locations. To continue their successful efforts, the City is seeking additional funding to keep standards of care high and be gin to work on additional improvement projects. The project will improve the safety, fun ction, aesthetics, and improve the use of the river access facilities, encouraging sport fishin g activity, environmental stewardship, and healthy activity.

NEED: Proper maintenance of these facilities is necessary to ensure that waste does not flow into the river and the facilities remain usable and inviting. When visitors ha ve easy access to trash receptacles, restrooms, and clean facilities they will use them. This requires regular maintenance service to ensure that trash receptacles are emptied, restrooms are cleaned, and the overall cleanliness of the facility is attended to. When facilities are poorly maintained, visitors lack access to proper disposal, some find othe r places to visit, and sometimes illegal activity occurs. Additionally, a rise in van dalism contributes to these issues, placing additional strain on staff and resources to kee p facilities up to a high standard.

Additional maintenance activities at the City’s river access facilities will protect the environment along the Sacramento River, improving salmon habitat and redu cing pollution. The City also regularly focuses on fuel reduction and invasive species removal activities around its facilities. Project efforts will work to control the growth of invasive plant species by removing and treating them, reduce erosion through maintenance and repair efforts that help control runoff, and remove litter that would othe rwise enter the river. These efforts will allow native vegetation to thrive, supporting the natural systems along the waterway and bolstering fish habitat by improving shaded aquatic areas.

Overall, the project will improve the experience of the user and support a thriving riparian habitat by concentrating maintenance efforts and staff presence at river access facilities.

Fishing and enjoying the outdoors brings many physical and mental hea lth benefits as well. Fishing requires focus and awareness, taking your mind off internal conf lict and stress, similar to meditation. As a result, fishing and outdoor activity helps to redu ce anxiety, fight off depression, and promote relaxation. Studies have shown that fishing Packet Pg. 61
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive G2498104
01/01/2025 – 12/31/2025

2 of 6
lowers your cortisol levels (stress hormone). Fishing has even been used to help peop le who have experienced trauma or suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).

PURPOSE and OBJECTIVE(S):

The purpose of this project is to improve and maintain fishing and rive r access opportunities and facilities for the public in Redding, CA. This project’s main objective is to operate and maintain six facilities operated and/or owned by the City of Redding along the Sacramento River.

1. Facilities/Areas Operations and Maintenance (O&M).
a. Operate and maintain six boating and river access facilities in Redding, CA by December 2025.
b. Activity Tag 1: Recreational boating facilities
c. Number of facilities: 6
d. Activity Tag 2:
i. 3 Launch Ramps

1. Lake Redding Boat Ramp

2. John Reginato River Access

3. Turtle Bay Boat Ramp
ii. 3 Carry-down access

1. Nur Pon Open Space and River Access

2. Turtle Bay East Open Space and River Access

3. Kum Bay Xerel Open Space and River Access
e. R3 Related Activity: No

R3 Related Activities: None

APPROACH:

Objective 1 Approach:

1. Properly train assigned staff to perform the assigned tasks thoroughly, safely and professionally.

2. Complete the facility maintenance checklist tasks for each facility for the assigned day.

3. Properly dispose of garbage removed from the site and report any extraordinary issues to a supervisor.

Maintenance efforts include 3-5 visits per week to each site to clean fa cilities including on-site public restrooms, parking lots and walkways. Staff and contracted v endors will perform these services as well as open and close facilities, maintain vegetati on and reduce invasive species, and complete facility inspections.

Packet Pg. 62
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive G2498104
01/01/2025 – 12/31/2025

3 of 6
The objectives of the project are to offer clean and hospitable facilities to encourage boaters, fishers and paddlers to use the facilities and enjoy the beauty of the Sacramento River. We anticipate increased use of the facilities as a result. During the project, the City will conduct visitor counts at each location to track any changes in visitation stem ming from the project activities.

RESULTS or BENEFITS: The benefit of accomplishing these objectives is that the public will experience improved angling opportunities and fishing facilities wil l generate much less waste into the Sacramento River, improving the health of the fisheries and ri parian habitat. Visitors will find the amenities they seek in clean, good working condition.

GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION:

The sites to be maintained are (Attachment A Map):

1. Lake Redding Boat Ramp – 2225 Benton Road, Redding, CA

2. Turtle Bay Boat Ramp – 725 Auditorium Drive, Redding CA

3. Turtle Bay East Open Space and River Access – 1601 Bechelli Lane, Redding, CA

4. Nur Pon Open Space and River Access – 2502 Henderson Road, Redding, CA

5. John Reginato River Access – 3845 S. Bonnyview Rd., Redding, CA

6. Kum Bay Xerel Open Space and River Access – 7230 Riverland Drive, Redding, CA

PRINCIPLE INVESTIGATOR FOR RESEARCH PROJECTS: This project does not involve research.

BUDGET NARRATIVE: The attached Budget Detail demonstrates the connection between costs and the proposed project activities. Project personnel costs, including base-line salaries, estimated salary adjustments and benefits are directly cha rged.

Additionally:

General Expense ($0): N/A

Minor Equipment ($0): N/A

Travel/Training ($0): N/A

Internal Contracts ($0): N/A

External Contracts ($428,167): Items that are necessary and reasonable for the associated personnel services and project activities, which may include miscellaneous office costs and supplies, freight and drayage, facility costs for meetings and conferences, maintenance and repairs of office equipment, tags and tagging supplies, nets, sensitive non-IT goods, and other minor expenses as incurred.

Packet Pg. 63
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive G2498104
01/01/2025 – 12/31/2025

4 of 6
These funds are used for City of Redding labor to perform the ma intenance and improvement projects at the facilities. A crew of four employees will be hired by the City specifically for this project, dedicated to the tasks outlined in the projec t scope.

Funds are for hourly staff salaries and benefits.

Major Equipment ($0): Federally-funded equipment will not be acquired for use on this project.

Useful Life: This grant does not include any capital improvement projects.

Program Income: N/A. This project will not generate and program income.

Match Description: The City of Redding will provide match funding of 25% of the total project cost as outlined in the budget. Match will come from staff time directly spent on the maintenance of the facilities. The match funding will directly co ntribute to the delivery of the objectives outlined in this application.

INDIRECT COST STATEMENT: California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) is a U.S. State government entity receiving more than $35 million in direct Federal fund ing each year. The indirect cost rate proposals are submitted to the U.S. Department of the Interior. Currently, the approved FY23/24 rate is 18.94%. The FY24/25 rate proposal will be submitted for approval and is subject to change.

SINGLE AUDIT REPORTING STATEMENT: CDFW submitted a Single Audit Report to the California Department of Finance (DOF) for the most recently closed Fiscal Year.

DOF compiles and submits a single Audit Report on behalf of the State of California. The report is available on the DOF website, located here:
https://dof.ca.gov/programs/osae/california-single-audit-and-state-leadership- accountability-reports/

MULTI-PURPOSE FUNDING: None.

RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER GRANTS: The project is currently funded by a FY 23/24 SFRA grant (Boating and Fishing Access Maintenance and Operations – Redding, CA G2398053/ F23AF01256 (Q2396800) for which the contract was executed in Oct ober.

The FY23/24 grant is being extended to 12/31/2024, however, wi ll end before this FY24/25 grant starts. The proposed grant will be a continuation of the previous grant.

TIMELINE: All activities are intended to occur within the fiscal years 2024/25 and 2025/26 grant cycle. The anticipated timeline for the activities described in the approach is as follows:

Anticipated
Time Frame
Activity
Packet Pg. 64
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive G2498104
01/01/2025 – 12/31/2025

5 of 6
January- Dec
2025-
Facility maintenance

ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE:

See attached iPac report for the project area (Attachment D).

a. NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (NEPA):

The efforts described in this project are ongoing maintenance activities that do n ot alter or change the facility and should not be considered a “project” under the National Environmental Policy Act. There will be no or only minor change in use as a result of these efforts. Should it be required, the work is eligible for the NEPA cate gorical exclusion B(2): (Attachment B)

The operation, maintenance, and management of existing facilities and rou tine recurring management activities and improvements, including renovations and replacements which result in no or only minor changes in the use, and have no or negligible environmental effects on-site or in the vicinity of the site. (Table 1)

b. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (ESA):

See the attached ESA Evaluation Form. (Attachment C)

c. NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT (NHPA):

No historic or prehistoric facilities, structures, sites or other items of potential historic significance will be affected by the maintenance-level activities outlined in this project.

d. BALD AND GOLDEN EAGLE PROTECTION ACT (EAGLE ACT):

The City utilizes best practices, including tree and raptor surveys which are conducted during nesting season and activities that would cause harm or disturbance to habitat are avoided. Any work triggering a CDFW Lake and Streambed Alteration Program permit will also include protection measures.

e. OTHER PERMITS: List and provide the current status of any other required federal permits (e.g. Clean Water Act, Rivers & Harbors Act, etc.). Attached copies o f completed permits as appendices.

No other permits are required for this project. See the attached Notice of Exemption (Attachment E).

REFERENCES: N/A

KEY CONTACTS:

Grant Administrator: Jennifer Wohlfrom, Federal Assistance, (916) 445-3694; [email protected]

Packet Pg. 65
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive G2498104
01/01/2025 – 12/31/2025

6 of 6
Travis Menne, Director of Community Service City of Redding 777 Cypress Ave Redding, CA 96001 [email protected] 530-225-4085

Basil Ibewiro, CDFW Program Manager, 1 (916) 216-8481, [email protected]

Packet Pg. 66
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Packet Pg. 67
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Packet Pg. 68
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Packet Pg. 69
Attachment: Notice of Award - Grant No. F24AF02434-00 (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Packet Pg. 70
Attachment: Location Map for Boating Access Grant (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive Grant State of California – Natural Resources Agency GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE CHARLTON H. BONHAM, Director Director’s Office
P.O. Box 944209
Sacramento, CA 94244-2090
wildlife.ca.gov
Conserving California’s Wildlife Since 1870

September 26, 2024

Travis Menne
City of Redding
777 Cypress Ave
Redding, CA 96001

NOTICE OF AWARD
Boating and Fishing Access Maintenance and Operations - Redding, CA (2025)

Dear Travis Menne:

We are pleased to inform you that your proposal, Boating and Fishing Access Maintenance and Operations - Redding, CA (2025), has been selected by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) for funding through the Sport Fish Restoration – Boating Access Grant Program. This letter serves as CDFW’s award of up to $428,167 under the Fiscal Year 2023/24 Proposal Solicitation Notice. Your non-federal cost share for this project is $142,722.

U.S Fish and Wildlife Service Grant Number: G2498104
Project Period: 1/1/2025-12/31/2025

Please note:
1) You are eligible for reimbursement as of the project period start date listed in the attached Notice of Award from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2) Your organization must enter into a grant agreement with CDFW to be reimbursed for project costs – we anticipate grant agreements being executed no sooner than October 15, 2024.

Your CDFW Grant Manager, Evangelina Chavez, will soon contact you to discuss the grant agreement development process, next steps, and confirm the agreement term and deliverables.

To expedite the grant process, please also provide the following forms to CDFW as soon as possible.

1. Payee Data Record form (STD. 204) and/or Payee Data Record Supplement (STD. 205)
Packet Pg. 71
Attachment: G2498104_Redding_CDFW-SFRA_Award_Letter (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive

Page 2 ends

https://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dgs/fmc/pdf/std204.pdf https://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dgs/fmc/pdf/std205.pdf

2. 501(c)(3) Certification (for non-profit organizations)

3. Drug-Free Workplace Certification (STD. 21)
http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dgs/fmc/pdf/std021.pdf

4. A current (non-expired) federal Negotiated Indirect Cost Rate Agreement (NICRA) if not using the de minimis rate.

5. Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act 2006 Contractor Certification (DFW 868) and a Subrecipient Risk Assessment (DFW 870). Any project receiving federal funds as part of the grant award is required to complete these forms.

DFW 868 - https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=195539 DFW 870 - https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=195540

6. An authorizing resolution from your governing body that confirms its approval of the projects and grant monies (if applicable).

Completed forms should be submitted to [email protected].

Finally, attached is a copy of CDFW’s General Grant Provisions, which outlines our terms and conditions for entering into a grant agreement and will be attached to the final agreement.

Should you have questions regarding the process, you may contact Elizabeth Buttler at (916) 594-3879 and [email protected].

Sincerely,

Matt Wells, Branch Chief
Watershed Restoration Grants Branch
Attachments:

CDFW General Grant Provisions
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Notice of Award

Packet Pg. 72
Attachment: G2498104_Redding_CDFW-SFRA_Award_Letter (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive

Page 3 ends

CC:

Tina Bartlett, Regional Manager
Northern Region
[email protected]

Basil Ibewiro, Environmental Program Manager
Watershed Restoration Grants Branch
[email protected]

Treva Porter, Senior Environmental Scientist, Supervisor Watershed Restoration Grants Branch
[email protected]

Evangelina Chavez, Environmental Scientist
Watershed Restoration Grants Branch
[email protected]

Kelly Ramos, Grant Coordinator
Watershed Restoration Grants Branch
[email protected]

Jason Roeh, Environmental Scientist
Watershed Restoration Grants Branch
[email protected]

Packet Pg. 73
Attachment: G2498104_Redding_CDFW-SFRA_Award_Letter (4.6(a)--Adopt Resolution to enter into a Grant Agreement with CDFW and Receive

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 66 th Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2030-060 increasing appropriations by $33,000 for Fiscal Year 2024-25 for the reclassification of two positions within the City of Redding Recreation Division.

Fiscal Impact

The City of Redding’s Recreation Division is proposing the reclassification of two staff positions, one Recreation Coordinator - status 8B (limited to 1 ,560 hours) to a full -time employee, and one R ecreation Coordinator - status 8A (limited to 990 hours) to a status 8B (limited to 1 ,560 hours) . These positions are estimated to costs $33,000 – they will have no impact on the General Fund as s taff costs will be offset entirely by existing and increased program fee revenues, expanded program offerings, grants, and special event revenue.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) could choose not to approve the resolution. However, this decision will present operational challenges and a potential decrease in the quality or quantity of services provided by the Recreation Division.

Background/Analysis

The Recreation Division provides cost-effective recreation and enrichment programs for our community. In 2023, t he Recreation Division, led by the Recreation Superintendent , three full- time Recreation Supervis ors, and part-time staffing, served over 40,000 registrants through 700 unique programs across 50 plus recreation and park facilities. In 2024, programs are back to pre - pandemic customer volumes, and staff is working towards building capacity to meet the growing demand for recreation programs at parks, fields, and other facilities. Growth in demand is testing the workload capacity of the Recreation staff, thus creating the need for additional support.

MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.6(b)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.6(b)--Approve staffing changes for the Recreation Division Travis Menne, Director of
Community Services
Packet Pg. 74
Report to Redding City Council December 12, 2024
Re: 4.6(b)--Approve staffing changes for Recreation Division Page 2

To deliver these programs, the Recreation Supervisors employ and manage the Recreation Coordinators. Recreation Coordinators plan, manage and supervise the individual programs and events. Essentially, the Recreation Coordinator position is the front line to meet the market demands of the community. However, l imitations on annual hours placed upon part -time employees hamper Recreation's ability to meet the community’s growing needs. A strategy of adding coordinators could allow for temporary relief of this issue. However, a part -time position that does not offe r benefits or holiday pay poses significant long -term challenges in recruiting and retaining qualified candidates. Instead, s taff proposes to reclassify two of the Recreation Division’s coordinators, one to full-time status and the other to status 8B (1,560 hours).

The coordinator status changes will be targeted for two specific programs which include:

Redding Aquatic Center

Staff proposes to reclassify a Recreation Coordinator I – status 8B (limited to 1560 hours) to be reclassified to a full-time (Regular 3) employee. This position is the lead Aquatic Coordinator for the Redding Aquatic Center (Aquatic Center) programs, including lifeguard training, junior lifeguard, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and first aid training, swim lessons, public swim, swim meets, and special events, which serve thousands yearly. This position is also one of two interim coordinators for the Redding Sports Park.

This current coordinator is the only American Red Cross Lifeguard Instructor Trainer in the region. With the Aquatic Center serving as the regional hub for water safety certification in the North State, the coordinator’s current hour restriction does not allow the facility to meet the needs of the market and provide al l of the certification requests received each year from local aquatic organizations or park and recreation districts outside of the area . The certification programs are fully enrolled with waiting lists and a cost recovery rate of 100 percent. These programs are necessary for pools in surrounding area s to staff their facilities . Without the Aquatic Center’s programs, other pool operators in the region must import trainers or send staff to other areas for training and certification. The Aquatic Center can capitalize on this regional revenue, and combined with other funding sources, support the change to a full -time coordinator with no impact to the General Fund.

The additional position cost of $34,910 will be partially offset by the revenues of expanding the Red Cross certification programs, estimated at $16,200 annually. The change will also allow for a doubling of course offerings to bring in additional uncaptured revenue, protect current revenue streams, and expand the market share, cementing the Aquatic Center as the destination for North State aquat ics training . Furthermore, offering these certifications in -house allows the Aquatic Center to train its own employees, reducing costs for required certifications that can require travel and registration fees, saving thousands annually.

New and enhanced t raining programs that the full -time position will provide will include year - round CPR/First Aid/AED, Epi -pen and inhaler training, Lifeguard Instructor Training, Babysitters Training, Lifeguard Training, Wilderness First Aid, Basic Water Rescue, Junior Lifeguard Academy, and Aquatic Examiner Services. Additional revenue will be generated by reviving two popular school fieldtrip programs, Paddle Science & Trail Science, which serve 400 youth in partnership with local school districts and Whiskeytown National Recreation Ar ea.

These programs are funded through annual Department of Boating and Waterways grants for an additional $16,000 charged to existing grant revenues. The remaining $2,710 cost will be offset by modest scheduled program fee increase s of no mor e than 3 percent on Learn -to-Swim offerings.

Packet Pg. 75
Report to Redding City Council December 12, 2024
Re: 4.6(b)--Approve staffing changes for Recreation Division Page 3

In summary, the $34,910 cost for the position increase will be funded through $16,000 of existing grant appropriations, $16,200 of new Red Cross certification program revenues, and $2,710 of Learn-to-Swim program revenue increases.

Summer Camp Programs

Staff proposes to reclassify an existing Recreation Coordinator – status 8A (limited to 990 hours) to a Recreation Coordinator – status 8B (limited to 1 ,560 hours). This position is the lead coordinator for Su mmer Day Camp programs, which serve over 150 youth daily across four locations. The position also supports the Recreation Division with special events throughout the year and inter -session day camp programs during the fall, winter, and spring seasons. Meeting the growing demands within the 990 hours per year limit is challenging. To maintain quality , additional planning time is required in the critical months leading up to the summer season.

Reclassification will ensure that the position has adequate hours to plan and prepare before June 30th when camps begin.

For this change , the additional cost of $1 4,090 will be wholly offset by a new 4.3 percent increase to the cost of camp programs, which are already slated for an increase to absorb the rising minimum wage. In total, camp fees will increase in 2025 by 15 percent, still landing below the market rate when compared to other local organizations and meeting cost recovery targets set by Council Policy 806 (Recreation Classes and Program Fees).

Reclassifying both of these positions to expand yearly hours is necessary to attract and retain talent, lower turnover rates, and increase employee morale.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act and no furthe r action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”

Attachments
^Resolution
Packet Pg. 76
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 66th AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2023-060 APPROPRIATING $33,000 FOR THE RECLASSIFICATION OF T WO POSITIONS WITHIN THE

RECREATION DIVISION

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

THAT Budget Resolution No. 2023-060 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
101

1721 Recreation

$33,000

THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Fund Balance
101-1721-3871101-00000 Other Classes - RAC 16,300$
101-1721-3879143-00000 Youth Day Camp Revenue 14,090.00 101-0000-2910000-00000 Fund Balance 2,610.00
Increase Expenditures
101-1721-4900111-00000 Full Time Regular 5,960.00$
101-1721-4900171-00000 Worker's Compensation Insurance 200 101-1721-4900173-00000 Group Insurance Program 10,820
101-1721-4900175-00000 Retirement Program - PERS 1,990
101-1721-4900177-00000 Medicare Employer 100
101-1721-4900122-00000 Part Time Regular 13,930
Total 33,000$ 33,000$

PERSONNEL FY 2024-25

Recreation Coordinator (Part Time) (.5 FTE)
Recreation Coordinator (Full Time) 1 FTE
Recreation Coordinator (Part Time)-Status 8A (.5 FTE) Recreation Coordinator (Part Time)-Status 8B .5 FTE

Packet Pg. 77
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.6(b)--Approve staffing changes for Recreation Division)

THAT the purpose is to appropriate $33,000 for the reclassification of two positions within the recreation division.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeti ng of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 3rd day of December, 2024, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

JACK MUNNS, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 78
Attachment: ^Resolution (4.6(b)--Approve staffing changes for Recreation Division)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the City of Redding Fire Department (RFD) to submit an application to the F ederal Emergency Management Agency Assistance to Firefighters Grant Program in the amount of $1,000,000, with a 10 percent match requirement, for the replacement of RFD’s Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus.

Fiscal Impact

The City of Redding Fire Department (RFD) is proposing to apply for $1 million from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Assistance to Firefighters Grant (AFG) to purchase updated equipment to extend the useful lives of the Self -Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA). The grant requires a 10 percent match of $100,000. If awarded AFG funding, staff will return to the City Council (Council) for grant acceptance , award, allocation and identification of the 10 percent match source.

Alternative Action

The Council could choose not to authorize RFD to apply for grant funding to replace the SCBA; however, the SCBA would still need to be replaced.

Background/Analysis

The AFG is a federal program that aims to meet the needs of firefighting, emergency response, and nonaffiliated emergency medical service organizations by providing funding. The funding provided through the grant is focused on firefighter health and safety, as well as the safety of th e public the firefighters serve.

MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.8(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.8(a)--Authorize Application for Assistance for Firefighters Grant Jerrod Vanlandingham, Fire
Chief
Packet Pg. 79
Report to Redding City Council December 12, 2024
Re: 4.8(a)--Authorize Application for Assistance for Firefighters Grant Page 2

A SCBA is a device that typically consists of a facemask with a hose that connects to an air source and is worn to provide breathable air while the wearer is in an atmosphere that is immediately dangerous to life and he alth. These devices protect firefighters when they enter into spaces where the air is a danger to their survival.

RFD received funding from the AFG in 2013 to purchase its current SCBA . National Fire Prevention Association (NFPA) standards require SCBA ’s be replaced every 10 years or after two NFPA revision cycles. In this case, RFD will meet the 10 -year requirement . While the current SCBA’s we utilize have met our needs over th e last 10 years, ensuring we have reliable, clean, breathable air to carry out our mission for the next 10 years is critical.

Environmental Review

This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Public Safety – "Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding."

• Budget and Financial Management – "Achieve balanced and stable 10—year Financial Plans for all funds."
Packet Pg. 80

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Accept update regarding the Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project and, in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050(c)(1), make a determination by a four -fifths vote that there is a need to continue the emergency work.

Fiscal Impact

The Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Pla cer Street Project (Project) costs will be funded by Public Works’ Wastewater, Water , and Streets Divisions. The updated, total project construction cost of the repairs is $2,794,556.32.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to acc ept the project status report and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis

On May 7, 2024 , Council adopted an emergency resolution for the project and authorized the negotiation of an emergency public works contract. The project includes replacing substandard sewer pipe, associated infrastructure, failing asphalt concrete and other miscellaneous public health and safety work on Placer Street and within the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvement Phase I project limits.

MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Update Regarding Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 81
Report to Redding City Council December 12, 2024
Re: 4.11(a)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Page 2

Cox & Cox Construction (Contractor) completed all underground repairs at all locations by August 30, 2024 , and also completed repaving of Placer Street on September 9, 2024 .

Additionally, the contractor completed restriping of Placer Street on September 27, 2024 ; raising of manhole and valve lids along Placer Street on October 16, 2024; and completed the remaining work that included new sign installation s at various locations along Placer Street and minor punch list items completed on November 16, 2024. The final project closeout will be completed before the end of January 2025.

The table below provides further details of the contractor’s progress based on the number of locations that need to be addressed and their costs. Staff has received all c osts billed by the contractor through November 2024 and the total construction costs to date are $2,794,556.32.

The costs include paving, restriping, raising of manhole and valve lids, sign installation , and minor punch list items. The remaining project costs, not included in this report, are estimated to be $175,000 for staff and consultant costs to provide construction administration and inspection.

Staff will continue to update Council until staff is able to provide Council with a project acceptance report.

Original
Locations
Additional
Locations
Total
Locations
Completed
Locations
Costs to Date
96 0 96 96 $2,764,556.32

Environmental Review

This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and no further action is required. On Ma y 7 , 202 4, the Council determined that the project is categorically exempt from environmental review under the CEQA Guidelines, per Section 15269(b)-Emergency Projects.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”

Attachments
Previous Staff Report 5-7-24
Packet Pg. 82

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the following actions relative to the Emergency Repair and Replace ment of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project (Project):
(1) Adopt Resolution, by not less than four -fifths affirmative vote, authorizing the City Manager to negotiate and award an emergency public works contract for the Project in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000;
(3) Authorize the City Manager , or designee, to approve construction contingency amounts up to a total of $300,000;
(4) Authorize the City Manage r, or designee, to approve construction management and inspection amounts up to a total of $175,000; and
(5) Find that the Project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects.

Fiscal Impact

The estimated Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Project (Project) total cost is $ 2,475,000. These costs include construction, construction contingency and staff time for construction management and inspections. The project will be funded with remaining Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements Phase 1 funds. Including wit hheld retention, liquidated damages and uncompleted work items which is approximately $2,160,000. Supplemental funding of $315,000 will come from the Wastewater, Water and Streets Division’s Fiscal Year 202 3-24 budgets which have sufficient funds appropriated.

MEETING DATE: May 7, 2024
ITEM NO. 9.11(f)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.11(f)--Emergency Construction Contract to Repair and Replace Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Asphalt Concrete Pavement on Placer Street Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 83
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(a)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Report to Redding City Council May 2, 2024
Re: 9.11(f)--Emergency Repair and Replace Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Pavement on Placer St. Page 2

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose to not authorize the award of an emergency contract, and instead have staff prepare plans and specifications to award a contract to the low bidder in accordance with state and local contr acting procedures . Or, Council could provide alterative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis

On April 1, 2024, Council voted to enter into a Contract Amendment, Settlement Agreement and Release with the contractor for the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvem ents Phase 1 project. This settlement agreement was partially due to the contractor’s refusal to make required repairs to substandard work done on the project. This substandard work has the potential to create public health and safety issues.

Staff has considered repackaging the project plans and specifications for bidding ; however, this process would likely require a minimum of six months in order to obtain an executed contract and ultimately provide a contractor with a notice to proceed. This timeline is unacceptable given the condition of the installed sewer infrastructure and would jeopardize being able to complete all the repair work , including re -paving Placer Street, prior to the onset of winter . In addition, current Magnolia Area Sewer Improvement Phase 1 project site conditions present potential impacts to public health, property and safety. Therefore, staff proposes an emergency contract to replace the substandard sewer pipe and associated infrastructure , failing asphalt concrete and minor associated public health and safety work on Placer Street and within Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements Phase 1 project limits . Staff estimates the work will be complete within four months of commencement of construction activities.

It is noted that the Public C ontract Code (PCC) (Section 20168) provides that the local government’s legislative body may pass a resolution by a four -fifths vote of its members declaring that the public interest and necessity demand the immediate expenditure of public money to safeguard life, health and property. Further, the P CC (Section 22050) provides that “in case of emergency, a public agency, pursuant to a four -fifths vote of its governing body, may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate acti on required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts.”

It is in the public’s interest and necessity to repair the sewer system, pave Placer Street and repair or replace other associated minor items of work immediately to ensure protection of the public’s health, safety and personal property occurs.

The Resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review

Staff has determined that the project is exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, pursuant to Section 15269(b) – Emergency Projects. Section 15269(b) includes emergency repairs to publicly and privately -owned service facilities neces sary to maintain service essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. The emergency repair and replacement will occur in areas of previous disturbance, and the repairs are necessary to maintain service essential to public health.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 84
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(a)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Report to Redding City Council May 2, 2024
Re: 9.11(f)--Emergency Repair and Replace Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing Pavement on Placer St. Page 3

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
^Notice of Exemption

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 85
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(a)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING TO

AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO AWARD AN EMERGENCY

CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT TO REPAIR AND REPLACE SUB-

STANDARD SEWER PIPE AND FAILING ASHPHALT CONCRETE

PAVEMENT ON PLACER STREET

WHEREAS, Public Contract Code section 22050 and Redding Municipal Code 4.22.120(A) provide that, in the case of emergency, a public agency may repair or replace a public facility, take any directly related and immediate action required by that emergency, and procure the necessary equipment, services, and supplies for those purposes without giving notice for bids to let contracts; and

WHEREAS, on April 1, 2024, Council voted unanimously to enter into a Contract Amendment, Settlement Agreement and Release regarding the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements – Phase I project; and

WHEREAS, portions of the underground sewer improvements constructed as part of the Magnolia Area Sewer Improvements – Phase I project were not constructed in accordance with the contract documents; and

WHEREAS, proper sewer infrastructure is critical to public health; and

WHEREAS, if not repaired immediately, the improperly installed sewer infrastructure has a high potential for failure during high-flow periods, winter, potentially ultimately causing significant disruptions in service, failures and damage to associated public and adjacent private infrastructure; and

WHEREAS, Placer Street is a primary arterial with moderate traffic volumes and the asphalt concrete pavement is in a failing condition as a result of longitudinal and transverse sewer trench pavement patches within the roadway section presenting a public safety concern; and

WHEREAS, a competitive solicitation for bids is anticipated to require six (6) months and would further delay the needed repairs to prevent sewer blockages, sink holes and further damage to the public and private infrastructure until 2025; and

WHEREAS, continued pavement failure and blockage of the sewer conveyance system would threaten the safety and property of roadway users and persons nearby; and

WHEREAS, isolation of the impacted area so that the delay due to competitive bidding could be accommodated would not mitigate or eliminate the threat to persons and property;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:

1. The City Council of the City of Redding finds that the recitals set forth above are true and correct and are hereby adopted as findings of fact.

2. The public interest and necessity require the immediate expenditure of public money to restore the sewer conveyance system to full capacity, protect the public health, safety and welfare, and prevent further damage to the roadway.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 86
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(a)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing

3. The City Council of the City of Redding therefore authorizes the City Manager to award an emergency construction contract to repair the sewer system and roadway along Placer Street.

4. The action authorized herein shall be reviewed by the City Council at all regular meetings of the Council until such time as the City Council determines that the emergency is abated.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 7th day of May, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

____________________________________
TENESSA AUDETTE , Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:

_________________________________ _____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 87
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(a)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing

CITY OF REDDING

LOCATION MAP

MAGNOLIA AREA SEWER
IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE 1

EMERGENCY REPAIRS PUBLIC WORKS

DEPARTMENT

LOCATION

PROJECT

ORIGINAL

REPAIR AREA

EMERGENCY

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 88
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(a)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 89
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 5-7-24 (4.11(a)--Update of Emergency Repair and Replacement of Substandard Sewer Pipe and Failing

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Accept an update re garding the City of Redding’s COVID -19 Economic Stimulus Package projects.

Fiscal Impact

The City Council (Council) previously approved an allocation of $9.5 million in Greenhouse Gas Cap and Trade auction proceeds for projects that reap an energy savin gs benefit to the City of Redding (City). To date, the City Manager has authorized purchases and projects totaling approximately $3.9 million and a consulting services agreement for engineering and construction management support of more than $1.2 million. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

Alternative Action

The Council may choose not to accept the Project Status Report and provide further direction to staff.

Background/Analysis

On April 21, 2020, the Council unanimously approved the City’ s Economic Response Plan.

Included in the plan, is the allocation of $9 .5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for several projects associated with the Local Economic Stimulus Package that equates to a savings in energy costs for the City. On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized the City Manager to execute agreements, purchase orders, and contracts associated with the program to ensure an expedited delivery schedule. The Council also directed staff to provide regular status updates o f the program and ratify all City Manager awards.

MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(b)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(b)--COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 90
Report to Redding City Council December 12, 2024
Re: 4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update Page 2

As directed by the City Manager, staff has endeavored to break up most of the work into smaller contracts, with values lower than $500,000, with the idea that local contractors and vendors will compete better d ue to lack of mobilization costs and other local advantages. However, the City has limited control because these are Public Works contracts and must be awarded to the lowest responsible and responsive bidder in accordance with State of California law.

To date, staff has awarded 17 projects totaling roughly $3.9 million that include:

• Projects for lighting improvements at sport fields, the Library, Corporation Yard, City Hall, the Police Department, the Civic Auditorium, fire stations, and various other Ci ty buildings;
• Projects to install solar power generation systems, including roof replacements, at various fire stations;
• A project for pumping efficiency improvements at the Redding Aquatic Center; and • Purchase orders and on -call contract services for ligh ting, plumbing, mechanical work, window replacements, and equipment.

There have been 15 projects completed, and 10 of the 1 7 projects have been awarded to local contractors. Only two projects for heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) have yet to enter the construction phase, including HVAC upgrades at City Hall and the Corporation Yard.

The design package for HVAC upgrades at City Hall is currently advertis ing for bids and staff plans to advertise the HVAC upgrades at the Corporation Yard in early 2025. Due to extensive delays with the construction of the lighting project at the Civic Auditorium , staff is working to cancel this contract, as Building Maintenance staff has already replaced a majority of the existing lamps with new LED lamps and will continue to replace the few remaining lamps over time as they fail. The attached Project Status Report provides more detailed information on project status and costs. Staff will continue to return to the Council quarterly to provide progress updates, wi th the next update anticipated to be March 18, 2025.

Environmental Review

Accepting the Project Status Report is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. T he individual projects within this report may be subject to CEQA and are individually analyzed.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10 -year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and wo rkforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”

Packet Pg. 91
Report to Redding City Council December 12, 2024
Re: 4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update Page 3

Attachments
^Project Status Report
Previous Staff Report 04-21-20
Previous Staff Report 05-05-20
Packet Pg. 92
Project # Description Project Type Contract Method
Award/PO
Date
Ratification
Date Contractor
Local Contractor,
Sub, or Supplier? Cost Est Actual Cost
$ to Local
Contractors
Estimated
Completion
Date
Acceptance
Date Project Status

PROJECTS IN CONSTRUCTION
C19-L-06 LED Lighting Retrofit at Civic Auditorium Lighting Standard Bid 11/23/2021 12/21/2021 Fluoresco Services, LLC No 162,111$ 77,387$ -$ - Canceling contract due to delays. Building Maintenance staff will replace lights with LEDs as needed.

C19-P-03 Aquatic Center Pumping System Upgrade Plumbing Standard Bid 11/30/2023 12/19/2023 Tricon Construction, Inc No 250,356$ 246,323$ -$ 4/1/2025 Contractor ordering materials.

PROJECTS IN DESIGN
C19-M-03 Upgrade HVAC at City Hall & Police Department HVAC Standard Bid 888,430$ 6/1/2025 Advertised for construction bids.

C19-M-04 Upgrade HVAC at Caldwell Park Rec Center HVAC Standard Bid - TBD Design on hold until future of rec center and ownership is resolved.

C19-M-05 Upgrade HVAC at Corp Yard HVAC Standard Bid 195,000$ 7/1/2025 Jacobs finalizing bid package.

C19-S-03 Solar PV & Replace Roofs - Fire Stations 1 and 3 Solar Standard Bid 250,000$ TBD Design on hold until future plan for these fire stations is determined.

C19-W-04b Replace Windows at Fire Stations 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 Windows Standard Bid 153,000$ TBD Design on hold until future plan for the fire stations is determined.

C19-M-06 Replace HVAC at Civic Auditorium HVAC Standard Bid 3,500,000$ TBD Design on hold until City determines if budget will be available.

C19-S-04 Install Solar and Replace Roof at Civic Auditorium Solar Standard Bid 1,600,000$ TBD Design on hold until City determines if budget will be available.

PROJECTS COMPLETE
C19-L-01 LED Lighting Retrofit at three Non Profit Buildings at Diestelhorst Landing. Lighting On-Call Contract 6/9/2020 7/21/2020 B&C Yes 48,000$ 13,000$ 13,000$ 7/9/2020 7/31/2020 Construction completed.

C19-L-02 LED Lighting Retrofit at Library Lighting Standard Bid 11/19/2020 12/15/2020 Clear Blue Energy Corp. No 194,263$ 53,633$ -$ 3/1/2021 2/22/2021 Construction completed.

C19-L-03 LED Lighting Retrofit at Corp Yard Lighting Standard Bid 12/15/2020 1/19/2021 Fluoresco Services, LLC No 391,117$ 137,294$ -$ 6/22/2021 8/6/2021 Construction completed.

C19-L-04 LED Lighting Retrofit at City Hall and Police Station Lighting Standard Bid 8/2/2021 8/17/2021 Fluoresco Services, LLC No 519,000$ 189,367$ -$ 10/1/2022 9/20/2022 Construction completed.

C19-L-05
LED Lighting Retrofit at Various Locations (Aquatic Center, Caldwell Park, Fire Stations, MLK Jr Center, Enterprise Park, Old City Hall, Senior Citizens Hall, and California Soccer Park)
Lighting Standard Bid 6/2/2022 6/21/2022 Advanced Lighting Services, Inc. No 386,077$ 145,255$ -$ 1/31/2023 2/1/2023 Construction completed.

C19-PO-01 Sourcewell purchase order for stadium lighting (Equipment Only) at Alta Mesa Park, Softball Park, South City Park, Buckeye Park, and Caldwell Park Stadium Lighting Purchase Order (Equipment Only) 7/16/2020 7/21/2020 Musco No 1,227,941$ 1,227,941$ -$ 12/31/2022 2/8/2023 Purchase order with Musco for equipment. Projects complete.

C19-LS-01 Installation of City purchased stadium lighting equipment at Alta Mesa Park, Softball park, South City Park Kiwanis 1, and Tiger Field Stadium Lighting Standard Bid (Installation Only) 3/31/2021 4/20/2021 Builders Solutions, Inc. Yes 465,014$ 750,691$ 750,691$ 12/31/2022 2/8/2023 Construction completed.

C19-LS-02 Installation of City purchased stadium lighting equipment at Buckeye Park and Caldwell Park Stadium Lighting Standard Bid
(Installation Only) 2/17/2021 3/16/2021 Builders Solutions, Inc. Yes 341,500$ 319,647$ 319,647$ 4/25/2022 5/10/2022 Construction completed.

C19-P-01 Replace Water Heaters in Fire Stations 2, 3, 4, and 6 Plumbing On-Call Contract 6/30/2020 7/21/2020 American Leak Detection Yes 49,000$ 13,050$ 13,050$ 9/16/2020 10/2/2020 Construction completed.

C19-P-02 Replace Laundry Facilities in Fire Stations 2, 3, 5, 7, and 8 Plumbing On-Call Contract 6/25/2020 7/21/2020 American Leak Detection Yes 17,000$ 12,759$ 12,759$ 9/16/2020 10/2/2020 Construction completed.

C19-M-01 Replace HVAC Units in Fire Stations 1,2,4,6 HVAC On-Call Contract 6/9/2020 7/21/2020 ACCO Yes 92,109$ 95,278$ 95,278$ 12/1/2020 11/30/2020 Construction completed.

C19-M-02 Replace HVAC Units in Old City Hall HVAC On-Call Contract 6/15/2020 7/21/2020 ACCO Yes 135,755$ 97,985$ 97,985$ 1/20/2021 1/13/2021 Construction completed.

C19-S-01 Solar PV at Fire Stations 7 & 8 Solar Standard Bid 9/29/2021 10/19/2021 B & B Solar Inc. Yes 100,529$ 98,900$ 98,900$ 8/1/2023 9/22/2023 Construction completed.

C19-S-02 Solar PV & Replace Roofs at Various Fire Stations (Stations 2, 4, 5, and 6) Solar Standard Bid 11/23/2021 12/21/2021 Harbert Roofing, Inc. Yes 525,610$ 372,068$ 372,068$ 9/8/2023 12/18/2023 Construction Completed.

C19-W-04a Replace Windows at Fire Station 5 Windows On-Call Contract 3/1/2023 12/19/2023 Harbert Roofing, Inc. Yes 16,000$ 15,526$ 15,526$ 12/31/2023 12/22/2023 Construction Completed.

Sub Total: 11,507,812$ 3,866,103$ 1,788,904$

PROJECT MANAGEMENT/DESIGN/CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT SERVICES C-19-DC-01 Project Management, Design and Construction Services Engineering Consultant PSA 6/9/2020 7/21/2020 Jacobs Engineering Yes 1,240,816$ On-going design and construction management services Total 12,748,628$ 3,866,103$ 1,788,904$
Project Budget $9 M. Projects will be prioritized and delivered to fit within approved budget
Energy Efficiency Economic Response Plan (EEERP) Project Status Report Packet Pg. 93
Attachment: ^Project Status Report (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Accept the City of Redding Economic Response Plan and provide direction to staff as follows:

(1) Approve deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) hotels and motels. (2) Approve modification of existing Community Assistance for Redding Electric Services (CARES) guidelines.
(3) Approve modification of amortization policy for City of Redding utility bills. (4) Approve the refund of all City of Redding utility deposits. (5) Rescind approval of allocation of C ap and Trade funds for the Wildfire Mitigation and Building Electrification programs; approve Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be distributed to electric customers; and adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 32nd Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 to appropriate a total of $9 million in Greenhouse Gas allotment for utility rebates. (6) Approve adoption of a u tility grant program for small businesses utilizing $600,000 of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding.
(7) Economic Stimulus Package
a. Approve additional use of $5 million of Greenhouse Gas allo tment and adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 33rd Amendment to City of Redding Budget Resolution No. 2019 -050 allocating money for projects designated as providing energy savings for the general fund.
b. Provide direction on projects involving utilities funding and borrowing.

Fiscal Impact
The amount of impact of this proposal depends on the City Council’s (Council) direction for staff. The programs implemented thus far are e xpected to impact the General Fund due to approximately $500,000 in missed revenue projections. Programs such as modifying the Amortization Program guidelines and deferring Transient Occupancy Tax will reduce reserves in the short term by providing cash fl ow relief to businesses. Using restricted revenue funds to modify existing CARES program guidelines, and also refunding City of Redding utility deposits MEETING DATE: April 21, 2020
ITEM NO. 9.1(b)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(b)--Consider Economic Response Plan related to the Covid -19 pandemic's impact on the City and provide direction regarding mitigation measures.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 94
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Report to Redding City Council April 16, 2020
Re: 9.1(b)--Economic Response Plan Page 2

and creating a utility grant program for small business will not impact unrestricted reserves. If the a dditional utility credit is approved, $9 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds would need to be allocated, some of which would be reallocated from previously funded projects, to bring the total allocation to $11 million for utility rebates. To complete projects listed in the Local Economic Stimulus Package, $5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds would need to be allocated in addition to the $4 million already allocated . The Council could also, through approval of this report, provide direction and identify an amount of money to reserve to pay for any potential borrowing for projects that would be approved through the Local Economic Stimulus Package.

Alternative Action
The Council has multiple options with this report. If it chooses to not accept the report in its entirety, all currently implemented programs would cease and no additional community assistance programming would take place at this time . The Council could choose to accept the report, and therefore all of the currently implemented proje cts as well, and provide direction to staff regarding which new projects to move forward.

Background/Analysis
The Covid -19 global pandemic has been a health catastrophe causing significant disruption in individual, community and societal norms while devastating the economy. The City of Redding, as the local governmental entity, needs to take bold action in line with the State and Federal Government to not only protect the health and welfare of the individual but also of the economy.

The City of Redding City Council will be presented with a number of proposed initiatives and projects to help individuals and businesses through this difficult time. The attached City of Redding Economic Response Plan is a report detailing programming currently implemented, as well as programming that could be implemented to assist the community. These items are varied in cost and source of funding.

Currently implementing
 Maintain City services
 Suspend Return to Owner fees for impounded animals
 Suspend late fees and interest on payments due to the City of Redding  Suspend City of Redding utility shut-offs due to non-payment  Suspend City of Redding utility payment late fees
 Cap and Trade distribution of $50 to every Redding Electric Utility ( REU) account holder

Pending approval
 Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax payment from hotel and motel businesses  Modify existing –Community Assistance for Redding Electric Services ( CARES) program guidelines to provide opportunity for additional financial assistance to qualifying utility customers
 Modify Utilities Amortization program guidelines to extend the amortization period, and extend the program to commercial customers
 Refund City of Redding utility deposits to residential and commercial customers  Additional Cap and Trade distribution of $200 to every REU account holder  Utility grant program for small businesses
 Local Economic Stimulus Package containing multiple projects that will result in local contract work opportunities and energy savings to the City of Redding Packet Pg. 95
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Report to Redding City Council April 16, 2020
Re: 9.1(b)--Economic Response Plan Page 3

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
 Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10 -year Financial Plans for all funds.”
 Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspects of public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.”  Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
 Government of the 21 st Century – “Be relevant and p roactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
 Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain curr ent businesses and attract new ones, and encourag e investment in the community.”

Attachments
Resolution - GHG Customer Distribution
Resolution - Green House Gas Allotment
COR Economic Response Plan 2020
Packet Pg. 96
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Resolution No. 2020 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 32ND AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 20 19-050 RESCINDING

APPROVAL OF ALLOCATION OF CAP AND TRADE FUNDS FOR THE WILDFIRE MITIGATION AND BUILDING ELECT RIFICATION PROGRAMS; APPROVE THE APPROPRIATION OF $9,000,000 OF CAP AND TRADE AUCTION PROCEEDS TO BE DISTRIBUTED TO RATEPAYERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-20.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

THAT Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
142 854 GHG Customer Distribution $9,000,000

THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease in Beginning Balance
142-851-01-0001-01 Beginning Balance 1,077,910$
Decrease in Cap and Trade Revenues
142-851-01-4400-01 Environmental Attributes 2,022,090$
Elimination of Building Electrification Project
142-854-8908-98 Building Electrification 4,000,000$
Elimination of Wildfire Mitigation Project
142-854-8908-99 Wildfire Mitigation 1,900,000$
Increase in GHG Customer Distribution
142-854-8908-90 GHG Customer Distribution 9,000,000$
Total 9,000,000$ 9,000,000$

THAT the purpose is to rescind approval of allocation of Cap and Trade funds for the Wildfire Mitigation and Building Electrification programs; approve the appropriation of $9,000,000 of Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be distributed to ratepayers for fiscal year 2019-20.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the C ity of Redding on the 21 st day of April, 2020 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

Packet Pg. 97
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ADAM McELVAIN, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 98
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Resolution No. 2020 - ____________

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 33RD AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 20 19-050 APPROVE AND APPROPRIATE ADDITIONAL USE OF $5,000,000 OF GREENHOUSE GAS

ALLOTMENT FOR PROJECTS DESIGNED AS PROVIDING ENERGY SAVINGS FOR THE GENERAL FUND FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019-20.

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

THAT Budget Resolution No. 2019-050 be and is hereby amended as follows:

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
142 854 Energy Efficiency Measures $5,000,000

THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease in Beginning Balance
142-851-01-0001-01 Beginning Balance 5,000,000$
Increase in Energy Efficiency Measures
142-854-8908-96 Energy Efficiency Measures 5,000,000$
Total 5,000,000$ 5,000,000$

THAT the purpose is to approve and appropriate additional use of $5,000,000 of Gree nhouse Gas allotment allocating money for projects designed as providing energy savings for the General Fund for fiscal year 2019-20.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Red ding on the 21 st day of April, 2020 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ADAM McELVAIN, Mayor

ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

PAMELA MIZE, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

Packet Pg. 99
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Packet Pg. 100
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
1 Table of Contents
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Plan Elements ................................................................................................................................................ 2 Elements currently implemented ............................................................................................................. 2 Maintain City Services .......................................................................................................................... 2 Suspend Return to Owner fees ............................................................................................................ 3 Suspend Late Fees and Interest on City Payments ............................................................................. 3 Suspend Utility Shut-Off ...................................................................................................................... 4 Suspend Utility Late Fees ..................................................................................................................... 4 Distribution of $50 to REU Account Holders ....................................................................................... 4 Pending the City Council’s approval ......................................................................................................... 4 Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax ................................................................................................... 5 Modify Existing CARES Program Guidelines ........................................................................................ 5 Modify Utilities Amortization Program Guidelines ............................................................................. 5 Refund City of Redding Utilities Deposits............................................................................................ 6 Additional Cap and Trade Distribution ................................................................................................ 6 Utility Grant Program for Small Businesses ........................................................................................ 6 Local Economic Stimulus Package ........................................................................................................ 7 Packet Pg. 101
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
2 Executive Summary

The Covid -19 globa l pandemic is a health catastrophe causing significant disruption in individual, community and societal norms. While the direct human suffering owed to the disease itself is horrific , the damage to the economy due to necessary health precautions is equally devastating. The City of Redding (City), as the local governmental entity , needs to take bold action in line with the State and Federal Government to not only protect the health and welfare of the individual but also that of the local economy. The City of Redding City Council (Council) has directed that a plan be developed to assist the community in economic recovery to coincide with the cessation of the pandemic. This report provides detailed information on the various programs that have been developed to help foster the economy through this economic disaster.

Some programs have already been implemented while others still need final approval from the City Council. In brief, the programs are listed below.

Currently implement Plan Element Value
Suspend Return to Owner fees $200
Suspend late fees and interest on City of
Redding payments
$60,000
Suspend City of Redding utility shut-offs Increased Cash Flow Suspend City of Redding utility late fees $425,000
Distribution of $50 to REU account holders $2,200,000

Plan Element Pending approval
Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax $250,000 Est. deferred Modify existing CARES program guidelines $1,500,000
Modify existing Utilities amortization
program guidelines
Increased Cash Flow
Refund City of Redding utility deposits $3,400,000
Additional Cap and Trade distribution $9,000,000
Utility grant program for small businesses $600,000
Local Economic Stimulus Package $20,000,000
Total Value of City Response Plan Est @ $37,500,000

Plan Elements

Elements currently implemented

Maintain City Services

City services provided to the community are critical in nature and are unable to cease in functionality. A multitude of projects, already in the works, have to continue processing in spite of the pandemic that has affected the natio n. In order to keep projects moving forward, and to Packet Pg. 102
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
3 continue to serve the community in this critical capacity, City departments implemented immediate changes to comply with State and Federal directives. Personnel able to work from home were provided resources to do so. Meetings of large groups of staff and/or the public were eliminated, and preparations were made to provide access to public meetings without further endangering the community. As a result of the rapid response of staff, City services continue to function for the bulk of the community . In spite of the closure of City Hall and the dim inished personnel in the Avtech and Corp Yard buildings, and the Transfer Station, critical City services such as police, fire, electric, solid waste removal, water and wastewater maintenance, and parks services still operate to the benefit of the community. Each position, whether working from home or in the office, is a critical component of maintaining the support of these services. Department directors monitor work product and load to ensure the City continues to function efficiently. The City is providing increased availability of cleaning supplies and sanitizing materials to offices and meeting spaces to maintain worker health.

To provide additional relief to re sidents and business owners, several programming decisions were implemented. Taking into consideration the varied economic status of Redding residents and businesses, the following steps were taken to provide some help financially.

Suspend Return to Owner fees

Effective March 23, 2020, Haven Humane Society suspended the charging of return to owner fees for animals impounded for running at large. A small portion of the fee is typically returned to the City to recoup costs of providing animal regulation services for the community. The total cost is expected to be less than $200 for the City. This allows Haven to reduce the number of animals left in the shelter while it is being operated a t minimum capacity, and it is a benefit for community members who are unable to make the payment at this time.

Suspend Late Fees and Interest on City Payments

The City has initiated the suspension of late fees and penalties for payments and all General Accounts Receivable for items like hangar rents and imposed fines. This is made possible through individual review of accounts as payments are submitted and the reporting is analyzed. Both systems are housed in the legacy system so adjustments are applied manually to individual accounts. The $35 returned check and returned ACH payment fees have been suspended as well. Returned c heck and ACH fees are charged on an individual b asis, and returned items are reported from the City’s banking system daily. When applicable, the returned item amount with the additional fee are typically charged back to established accounts. The fee will be eliminated from these charge backs.

The current plan is to suspend penalties and interest for receivables due in March and Apri l 2020, which would include payments due in April and May. Based on last year’s activities , it is estimated that the loss of revenue to the general fund from the suspensions will be $ 55,000. The suspension of the returned check and ACH fees is estimated to be $5,000 for the same time period. If extended an additional month through the end of the fiscal year (June 30, 2020) , the savings to the community equates to an estimated $60,000 which will result in an equal amount of lost revenue for the City.

Packet Pg. 103
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
4 Suspend Utility Shut-Off

Effective March 18, 2020, the City of Redding Utilities Customer Service suspended the practice of utility shut-offs due to non-payment. Each month, under normal circumstances, approximately 220 utility accounts are disconnected after failure to pay for utility service received over the previous 60 days. Typically, 75 percent of these customers pay their past due amount and have their utilities reconnected within two weeks. With the Covid -19 pandemic and the anticipated increase in the number of utility customers having difficulty keeping up with all of their monthly expenses, it was decided that loss of utility service should not contribute to the stress and anxiety already experienced. Once the pandemic has passed, the Customer Services division will work with customers using various tools to bring the accounts into good standing. It is known that this effort will result in a temporary increase in accounts receivable and decreased cash flow for all utilities – resulting in an equal amount of temporary financial relief to residents of the City of Redding. This measure may result in an increase in bad debt expense, however, additional proposed measures , listed later in this report, could assist in reducing bad debt expense .

Furthermore, bad debt would be sent to a collection agency with a recovery rate of approximately 30 percent.

Suspend Utility Late Fees

Like shut-offs, late fees for utility payments have been suspended. Late fees, historically, amount to $1.7 million per year. While late fee collections are not always linear , it is a close approximation that the suspension will save customers in excess of $425,000 due to the high potential that there will be an increase in late payments. Late fees are an administrative penalty, and therefore, are deposited in the General Fund. If it is assumed that there will be no attempt to collect the past-due late fees, the General Fund will miss revenue projections in this category by at least $425,000.

Distribution of $50 to REU Account Holders

The City Council approved the distribution of excess reserves to be credited to every Redding Electric Utility customer in December 2019 in the amount of $50 per account . The funding source for the distribution is the Greenhouse Gas Allowance Auction Proceeds (also referred to as GHG or Cap and Trade) , in an amount equal to about $2.2 million, and will be accomplished via a bill credit.

Pending the City Council’s approval

The following programming ideas were developed to provide additional options to provide financial relief to residents and businesses. These plan elements vary in how they target a diverse set of community members. Reaching as much of the community as possible is crucial for Redding to solidify its eco nomic foundation. These proposals require the City Council’s approval to proceed. Some of the following items can be implemented immediately, while others will need to be further developed and brought back to the Council for further direction.

Packet Pg. 104
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
5 Deferral of Transient Occupancy Tax
Defer payment of TOT from hotel and motel business until August 1, 2020 (payment due August 19, 2020). This deferral would be interest free and full payback would be made by November 1, 2020. The TOT deferral program could provide for much need cash flow for the Hotel and Motel industry by allowing an estimated $250,000 to remain with the business for operating expense. This program would be limited to Hotels/Motels with Business Licenses of 65-40-1 or 65-50-1.

Modify Existing CARES Program Guidelines

Community Assistance for Redding Electric Services (CARES) provides up to $300 of emergency assistance for the electric portion of bills for City of Redding utility customers. The intent of the CARES program is to help customers who have suffered a temporary financial hardship and to bring their account to a current status. Customers are eligible for CARES assistance once every 12 months. This program is funded out of the Public Benefits char ges included in each ratepayers’ bill. Staff recommends applying a $300 CARES credit to all residential customers enrolled in the Residential Energy Discount Program (REU’s low income program). This would provide $1.2 million of immediate utility cost relief to our lowest -income customers with an additional $600,000 of additional relief available to those who may apply due to becoming eligible due to impacts from covid -19. These funds would be replenished with the new budget year beginning on July 1, 2020. Should the Council choose to do this, staff recommends providing the Electric Utility Director authority to repeat this process , should the Stay at Home order continue through the summer , and also suspend the once-per-year limitation for applicants. This would have no impact on the Electric Utility’s financial metrics as defined in Council Policy 1414, as Public Benefit Programs are restricted.

Modify Utilities Amortization Program Guidelines

The City of Redding Utilities Customer Service provides amortization for residential customer bills that are past due. This allows customers to “catch -up” on their bill for up to 12 months by amortizing the past -due balance. Staff recommends temporarily expanding this to commercial customers and temporarily ext ending the amortization for a period of up to 24 months, which would essentially provide a zero percent loan to customers that are past -due and having trouble paying their bill. In addition, this would allow commercial customers who receive Small Business Administration Loans to focus on other essential costs. This would have a temporary impact on City of Redding Utilities, as cash would not be received for up to two years. The risk to the utilities would be any eventual non -performance of these loans ; non-performance would mean not paying the full amortization over the 24 -month period. Therefore, staff recommends establishing an “eligibility criteria” that the customer must have not been disconnected for non - payment of utilities in the previous year to be a utomatically approved for the amortization .

Customers not eligible for automatic amortization may still request it and approval will be granted on a case by case basis. Should the Council choose to do this, Staff recommends providing the Electric Utility Director administrative authority to modify program elements as necessary. As this could affect water, wastewater, and solid waste utilities, the Public Works Packet Pg. 105
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
6 Director would collaborate in these decisions. This plan element will potentially provide millions of dollars in available cash flow for residents and businesses.

Refund City of Redding Utilities Deposits

Staff recommends returning all customer deposits held by Utilities Customer Service s. This would return approximately $3.4 million to customers , including approximately $600,000 to commercial customers. The City holds utility deposits on customer accounts that present a higher credit risk to the utilities . By returning deposits, the City is returning monies to customers most in need. This would have no immediate impact on the Electric Utility’s financial metrics as defined in Council Policy 1414 as customer deposits are not included in unrestricted reserves for the purpose of calculating days of cash on hand. The risk to the utilities would be future bad debt accruals of non-payment of utilities by customers who have demonstrated difficulty paying bills.

However, this bad debt would be sent to a collection agency with a recovery rate of approximately 30 percent. Should the Council choose to do this, Staff recommends providing the Electric Utility Director authority to modify administrative processes for billing future utility deposits as defined in City Council Policy 1404. The deposit requirement will be reinstated at an unknown time in the future.

Additional Cap and Trade Distribution

Staff recommends a $200 credit on Electric utility bills to all customers out of Cap and Trade auction proceeds, which is similar to the $50 refund recently approved by Council . This would provide an additional $9 million in rebates to electric utility customers, bringing the total rebate amount, including the Council’s action on March 26, 2020, to approximately $11 million. To fund this program, the Council would need to allocate the balance of current year Cap an d Trade revenues and cancel two Council-approved programs that have yet to launch: Wildfire Mitigation and Building Electrification. Wildfire Mitigation has yet to start due to the California Air Resources Board not providing a quantification methodology f or reduced greenhouse gasses achieved through fuels reduction, thus the Cap and Trade funds are not available for this purpose. Building Electrification has yet to start due to staffing limitations. This would have no impact on the Electric Utility’s financial metrics as defined in Council Policy 1414 as Cap and Trade revenues are restricted.

Utility Grant Program for Small Businesses

As an entitlement city for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) the City receives an annual all ocation of Community Development Block Grant funding which is used for public service and public improvements. Due to the Federal CARES act the City received an additional allocation of $ 447,450. This funding, combined with unused funding from past projec ts, for a total of $600,000 provides the City an opportunity to provide funding toward eligible small business utility payments for those in the most need or are unable to receive Federal assistance or grants. If approved, staff will present the program and the amount available as part of the required public hearing to approve the use of the funding.

Packet Pg. 106
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) City of Redding Economic Response Plan – April 2020
7 Local Economic Stimulus Package

The Local Economic Stimulus Package is composed of multi -departmental projects intended to result in a combination of benefits to the City. In its infancy, this was a mass project designed to create an energy savings with each completed project . The City, however, has multiple deferred maintenance projects that must be completed to maintain the infrastructure stability of its assets.

Staff developed the following plan in a response to a need to merge the energy savings needs of the City with its deferred maintenance needs and infuse much needed capital into the local economy.

The projects in this package were specificall y chosen as critical needs either in the realm of energy savings, which qualifies the project to be paid for through GHG auction proceeds, or for its contribution to eliminating the deferred maintenance needs of the City. A combination of GHG funding, utility reserves, municipal bond, and energy cost savings would be used to fund the package with little or no net budgetary impact to the General Fund. The total value of the economic stimulus package is estimated at approximately $20 million. Approximately $ 9.5 million of GHG money could be allocated for the completion of the projects that realize an energy savings for the City. The energy savings over time for the General Fund could be used to fund the deferred maintenance needs.

Several of the anticipated projects such as the work at various fire stations and lighting upgrades would be started immediately and put out to bid as soon as possible. Other projects, such as the replacement of the heating and air conditioning system at the Civic Auditorium will need to be analyzed further. The intent is to move quickly to infuse available GHG funds and provide economic benefit for the community.

The calculated energy savings from the energy savings projects could be used to secure bond funding to accelerate up to another $10 million in local projects includ ing improvements to the Redding Aquatic Center, park facilities, required building maintenance , and other amenities.

Staff will return to the City Council with a full project list and borrowing options should the City Council provide direction to do so.

Completion of projects totaling up to $20 million is quite a large endeavor. However , the plan would be to bid multiple smaller projects to provide the best opportunity for local contractors to participate in the process, and thereby providing the local economy a direct opportunity to see quick and significant economic benefit in jobs and business activity. According to multipliers provided by the Shasta County Economic Development Corporation, the City of Redding would see a direct benefit equal to 328 jobs and $30 million of economic impact.

Packet Pg. 107
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 04-21-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the City Manager to award any public works contract, purchaseorder, or agreements, of any value, associated with the $ 9.5 million GHG funding approved as part of the Local Economic Stimulus Package.

Fiscal Impact
The City Council has previously approved the allocation of $ 9.5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for projects that reap an energy savings benefit to the City of Redding. There is no further fiscal impact to granting authority to the City Manager to execute the agreements, purchase orders, and contracts associated with these projects. There may, however, be an addedbenefit of seeingthe money infused more rapidly into the local economy.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose to not authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements, purchase orders, or contracts associated with the Cap and Trade distribution funds to expedite delivery of the work. This would lengthen the processto usethe authorized funding.

Background/ Analysis
On Tuesday, April 21, 2020, the City Council unanimously approved the Economic Response Plan. Included in the plan is the allocation of $ 9.5 million in Cap and Trade auction proceeds to be used for projects associated with the Local Economic Stimulus Package that equate to a savings in energy costs for the City of Redding. By authorizing the City Manager to negotiate, execute, and direct the agreements, purchaseorders and contracts, staff can proceed with rapidly assigning the work and awarding bids. The benefit to this is being able to see the Cap and Trade action proceedsgo to work assoon aspossible in the community, and thereby providing the local MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 9.1(b)
FROM:

APPROVED BY***
btippin@cityofredding. org
btippin@cityofredding. org
SUBJECT: 9.1(b)-- Consider authorizing the City Manager to award energy savings contracts, purchase orders, and agreementsrelated to the Green House Gas (GHG) funding approved by the City Council as part of the Local Economic Stimulus.

Barry Tippin, City Manager
Packet Pg. 108
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 05-05-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 9.1(b)--Authorize City Manager to award energy savings contracts Page 2 economy a direct opportunity to see a quick positive impact to jobs and businessactivity. The projects within the packagemay include, , LED light replacementin City facilities, reroofing and some solar installation at Fire Stations, replacing largely older and heavy energy using equipment with newer more efficient equipment, and additional energy saving projects to be determined
Council Priority/ City Manager Goals
Budget and Financial Management – “ Achieve balanced and stable 10- year Financial Plans for all funds.”
Public Safety – “Work to improve all aspectsof public safety to help people feel secure and safe where they live, work, and play in the City of Redding.” Communication and Transparency – “ Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Government of the 21stCentury – “ Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Economic Development – “ Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businessesand attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 109
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 05-05-20 (4.11(b)---COVID-19 Economic Stimulus Package Projects Update)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Approve and au thorize the following actions relative to the Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2:
(1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and the Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program; and
(2) Approve the Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 as described, thereby satisfying the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines §15074.

Fiscal Impact

Approval of the Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 ( Project) along with adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and the Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) allows the project to move toward the final design and construction phases. There is no fiscal impact as a direct result of adopting the MND, MMP, and approving the project.

The project construction costs are estimated to be approximately $1.5 million and has been budgeted through the Public Works’ Streets Division.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to adopt the MND and the MMP, and not approve the project as described. Without approval, the project would not be able to proceed as a City of Redding (City) project, as it would not comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).

MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 110
Report to Redding City Council December 12, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project Page 2

Background/Analysis

The project will improve safety along the Airport Road corridor by providing paved shoulders for cyclists and pedestrians and turn lanes for motorists. The project would span approximately

0.75 mile along Airport Road, from 190 feet south of Billy Jean Lane to Har tnell Avenue. Phase I (successfully completed in 2019) made similar improvements along Airport Road from Electro Way to Billy Jean Lane.

This project will provide two 12-foot-wide travel lanes; 8 -foot-wide paved shoulders with 3 feet of shoulder backing. A northbound left -turn pocket will be added at the intersection with Billy Jean Lane and the existing southbound right -turn pockets at Preserve Boulevard and Argyle Road will be lengthened. R oad widening will be intermittent (based on current widths) and v ary from zero to 15-feet. Widening will alternate between the east and west sides of the road and, in some locations, the road w ill be widened along both sides. Utility relocation may include fire hydrants and utility poles with their associated electrical , cable, and telephone lines. Th e anticipated utility relocation work will require soil disturbances ranging from 2 -8 feet in depth.

Trenching for underground lines would require a depth of 2 -feet, fire hydrant relocation would require a depth of three to four-feet, and utility pole relocation would require a depth of six to 8- feet.

Drainage in the area consists primarily of roadside ditches, with only a few culverts. Relocation of the ditches would require a maximum vertical depth of two-feet. Approximat ely 125 -feet north of Billy Jean Lane, an existing 30 -inch diameter and 77 -foot long reinforced concrete culvert will be extended eight feet to the west and six-foot concrete flared end sections will be added to the inlet and the outlet.

An Initial Study (IS) was prepared to satisfy the requirements of the C EQA. It describes why the project is being proposed and the potential impacts to the existing environment. The IS shows that the proposed project could have a significant effect on biological resources , but with implementation of mitigation measures, those impacts will be reduced to a level considered less than significant. The mitigation and conservation measures to be implemented are common practices and include, but are not limited to, biological pre -construction surveys, impact minimization, compensatory mitigation, and erosion control.

Based on the conclusions made in the IS, a n MND was prepared. The MND describes the project, including mitigation measures, and makes the determination that there wi ll be no significant effect on the environment provided that the defined mitigation measures are implemented as part of the project. In addition, a n MMP has been written and incorporated into the MND (CEQA Section 21081.6). The MMP will be used by City sta ff, contractors, agencies, and monitoring personnel during and after the project to ensure effective implementation of the adopted mitigation measures outlined in the MND.

The IS/MND/MMP documents were sent to the State Clearinghouse for a 30 -day public review period and distribution to pertinent state agencies. They were sent to local resource agencies, the Shasta County Clerk, and posted on the Public Works Department website. A public notice was also sent to landowners in the vicinity of the project an d posted in the local newspaper. Two comment letters were received during the public review period.

Packet Pg. 111
Report to Redding City Council December 12, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project Page 3

Environmental Review

The City is the lead agency for the project pursuant to CEQA. As the lead CEQA agency, the Council is authorized to adopt the MN D per Redding Municipal Code Section §18.24.070.E and state law. Upon adoption of the MND and approval of the project by the Council, a Notice of Determination will be filed with the Shasta County Clerk’s Office and the State Clearinghouse, completing the environmental review process. The IS/MND is available in the Public Works Department and is currently available online at
https://www.cityofredding.gov/government/departments/public_works/environmental_managem ent/index.php.

Council Priority/City Manager Goal

This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Mitigated Negative Declaration
^Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program ^Location Map
^Comments Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2
Packet Pg. 112
Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Page 1
October 2024

MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
AIRPORT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT PHASE 2
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2024-101104)

SUBJECT
Airport Road Improvements Project

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The City of Redding (City) is proposing the Airport Road Improvements Project in the City of Redding, Shasta County, California. The purpose of the project is to improve travel safety along the Airport Road corridor by providing paved shoulders for cyclists and pedestrians and turn lanes for motorists. The project would require road widening, earthwork, culvert extension, drainage modification, vegetation removal, utility relocation, paving, guardrail replacement, sign installation, and striping.

The project would provide two 12‐foot wide travel lanes with 8‐foot paved shoulders including 3‐feet of shoulder backing. A north bound left turn pocket would be constructed at Billy Jean Lane and the southbound right turn pockets at Preserve Boulevard and Argyle Road would be lengthened. The road widening would be intermittent (based on current widths) and vary from 0– 15 feet. Widening would alternate between the east and west sides of the road, and in some locations the road would be widened along both sides. Drainage in the area consists primarily of roadside ditches, with only a few culverts. Relocation of existing ditches would be included with the project. Approximately 125 feet north of Billy Jean Lane an existing One 30-inch diameter and 77-foot long reinforced concrete culvert will be extended 8-feet to the west, and 6-foot concrete flared end sections will be added to the inlet and the outlet. Utility relocation may include fire hydrants and utility poles with their associated electrical, cable, and telephone lines.

This work would require a vertical disturbance ranging from 2–8 feet. The majority of work would occur within City and County right-of-ways; however, temporary use permits to enter and construct on adjacent private lands may be needed to conform driveways, relocate utilities, or modify drainage. Permanent right-of-way acquisition would not be required.

ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Airport Road in the project area is bordered by a mix of commercial, industrial, residential, retail, and undeveloped properties. Airport Road in the project area is bordered by a mix of commercial, industrial, residential, retail, and undeveloped properties.

FINDINGS AND DETERMINATION
The City of Redding conducted an Initial Study (attached) that determined that the proposed project could have significant environmental effects on biological resources. Implementation of specific mitigation measures identified below will avoid or mitigate the potentially significant environmental effects identified, and the preparation of an environmental impact report will not be required. If there are Packet Pg. 113
Attachment: ^Mitigated Negative Declaration [Revision 1] (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigated Negative Declaration

Page 2 ends

October 2024
substantial changes that alter the character or impacts of the proposed project, another environmental impact determination will be necessary.

Prior to approval of the project, the lead agency may conclude, at a public hearing, that certain mitigation measures identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration are infeasible or undesirable. In accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Section 15074.1, the lead agency may delete those mitigation measures and substitute other measures that it determines are equivalent or more effective. The lead agency would adopt written findings that the new measure(s) is(are) equivalent or more effective in mitigating or avoiding potential significant effects and that it would not cause any potentially significant effect on the environment.
1) Based on the whole record (including the Initial Study and any supporting documentation) and the mitigation measures incorporated into the project, the City of Redding has determined that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. 2) The Mitigated Negative Declaration, with its supporting documentation, reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the lead agency, which is the City of Redding.

DOCUMENTATION
The attached Initial Study documents the reasons to support the above determination.

MITIGATION MEASURES
The following mitigation measures will be incorporated into the project to minimize potential effects on biological resources:
• MM-1. All on-site construction personnel shall receive instruction regarding the presence of listed species and the importance of avoiding impacts to these species and their habitat. • MM-2. To compensate for direct impacts on potential habitat for vernal pool tadpole shrimp and vernal pool fairy shrimp, the City will purchase the appropriate mitigation credits from a U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS)-approved mitigation bank or another site to be approved by the USFWS. Permanent impacts will be mitigated at a minimum ratio of 3:1 (three acres preserved for each acre of potential habitat removed). Temporary impacts will be mitigated on-site at a 1:1 ratio.
• MM-3. If vegetation removal or construction activities will occur during the nesting season for birds (February 1 through August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey 7 days before construction activities begin. If nesting birds are found, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) will be notified and consulted. An appropriate buffer, as determined by CDFW and the qualified biologist, shall be placed around the nest until the young have fledged. If construction activities cease for a period greater than 7 days, additional preconstruction surveys shall be required.

PUBLIC REVIEW DISTRIBUTION
Draft copies or notice of this Mitigated Negative Declaration were distributed to:

Packet Pg. 114
Attachment: ^Mitigated Negative Declaration [Revision 1] (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) City of Redding
Mitigated Negative Declaration Public Works Department, Engineering Division Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Page 3
October 2024
▪ State Clearinghouse
▪ Shasta County Clerk
▪ California Department of Fish and Wildlife District 1 ▪ Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
▪ California Native Plant Society
▪ Native American Heritage Commission
▪ State Office of Historic Preservation
▪ All property owners within 300 feet of the property boundary

PUBLIC REVIEW
(X) Draft document referred for comments October 25, 2024 – November 25, 2024 Date
( ) No comments were received during the public review period. ( X ) Comments were received but did not address the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration findings or the accuracy/completeness of the Initial Study. No response is necessary. The letters are attached. ( ) Comments addressing the findings of the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration and/or accuracy or completeness of the Initial Study were received dur ing the public review period. The letters and responses follow (see Attachment D, Response to Comments).

Copies of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, the Initial Study, documentation materials, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program may be obtained at the Public Works Department, Engineering Division, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. Contact: Tiffany Lightle, Associate Environmental Specialist, (530) 225-4171 or [email protected].

Date of
Draft Report: October 24, 2024 By:

Name/ Title: Tiffany Lightle
Associate Environmental Specialist
Date of
Final Report:

Attachments:

A. Project Location Map
B. Initial Study
C. Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program D. Comments and Response to Comments (if any)
December 18, 2024
Packet Pg. 115
Attachment: ^Mitigated Negative Declaration [Revision 1] (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) Packet Pg. 116
Attachment: ^Mitigated Negative Declaration [Revision 1] (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project)

ATTACHMENT A
Project Location Map

Packet Pg. 117
Attachment: ^Mitigated Negative Declaration [Revision 1] (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) Argyle Rd
Airport Rd
Thomason Trl
Cro
ss
roa
ds Dr
Preserve Blvd
Inverness St
Gibson Ct
Pa
lm
S
pring
s Dr
Pickford Way
Carlsbad Ln
Indian
W
ell
s Ln
Incl ine Way
Mar lene
Ave
Argyle Rd
Federer Pkwy
Nadal Dr Sampras Dr
Goolagon Blvd
Colby Trl
Hartne
ll Ave
Old Oregon Trl
Billy Jean Ln
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

LOCATION MAPGIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED:
0 400200 Feet-
P:\Engineering\ProProjects\AirportRdPhase_LocationMap.aprx SEPTEMBER 18, 2024

AIRPORT ROAD IMPROVEMENT
) JOO JJJ□□□JJ □ □JJ J□□ JJ J□□□JJ □□□ JJJ □ JJ J□□ JJJ□□□J J J□ - -
-- -- ----

I ,---------
\ I
i----~ I I
L _______ _
J I]□□□ ] JO □ □ ]]] J□□ JJJOO
'--_L_-
Packet Pg. 118
Attachment: ^Mitigated Negative Declaration [Revision 1] (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 Page 1
October 2024

MITIGATION MONITORING AND

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM
AIRPORT ROAD IMPROVEMENT PROJECT PHASE 2
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2024-101104)

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM CONTENTS
This document is the Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (MMP/ECP) for the Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 (project). The MMP/ECP includes a brief discussion of the legal basis for, and the purpose of, the program, discussion, and direction regarding complaints about noncompliance; a key to understanding the monitoring matrix; and the monitoring matrix.

LEGAL BASIS OF AND PURPOSE FOR THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM California Public Resources Code Section 21081.6 requires public agencies to adopt mitigation monitoring or reporting programs whenever certifying an environmental impact report (EIR) or a mitigated negative declaration (MND). This requirement facilitates implementation of all mitigation measures adopted through the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) process.

The MMP contained herein is intended to satisfy the requirements of CEQA as they relate to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the project. It is intended to be used by City of Redding (City) staff, participating agencies, project contractors, and mitigation monitoring personnel during implementation of the project.

Mitigation is defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15370 as a measure that does any of the following:
▪ Avoids impacts altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action. ▪ Minimizes impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation. ▪ Rectifies impacts by repairing, rehabilitating, or restoring the impacted environment. ▪ Reduces or eliminates impacts over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the project.
▪ Compensates for impacts by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments.

The intent of the MMP is to ensure the effective implementation and enforcement of adopted mitigation measures and permit conditions. The MMP will provide for monitoring of construction activities as necessary, onsite identification and resolution of environmental problems, and proper reporting to City staff.

In addition to meeting the CEQA MMP requirements, this document incorporates environmental commitments, standard practices, conservation measures, and best management practices (BMPs). The environmental commitments may be part of the project design, standard contract specifications, City requirements, or conservation measures. These commitments are part of the project, but they do not constitute mitigation under CEQA as they have not been incorporated to reduce a potentially significant impact.

Packet Pg. 119
Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program

Page 2 ends

October 2024

MITIGATION MONITORING/ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM TABLE The MMP/ECP Table identifies the mitigation measures and commitments proposed for the project.

The tables have the following columns:
▪ Mitigation Measure: Lists the mitigation measures identified within the Initial Study for a specific potentially significant impact, along with the number for each measure as enumerated in the Initial Study.
▪ Environmental Commitment: Lists the commitments identified within the project that are not related to a potentially significant CEQA impact, but further ensure environmental resource protection.
▪ Timing: Identifies at what point in time, review process, or phase the mitigation measure will be completed.
▪ Agency/Department Consultation: References the City department or any other public agency with which coordination is required to satisfy the identified mitigation measure. ▪ Verification: Spaces to be initialed and dated by the individual designated to verify adherence to a specific mitigation measure.

NONCOMPLIANCE COMPLAINTS
Any person or agency may file a complaint asserting noncompliance with the mitigation measures and commitments associated with the project. The complaint shall be directed to the City in written form, providing specific information on the asserted violation. The City shall investigate and determine the validity of the complaint. If noncompliance with a mitigation measure has occurred, the City shall take appropriate action to remedy any violation. The compliant shall receive written confirmation indicating the results of the investigation or the final action corresponding to the particular noncompliance issue.

Packet Pg. 120
Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 Page 3
October 2024

MITIGATION MONITORING AND ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENT PROGRAM TABLE FOR THE AIRPORT ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT PHASE 2

MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
(STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2024-101104)

ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITMENTS
The following environmental commitments will be incorporated into the project to further protect environmental and biological resources:

Best Management Practices
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
Air Quality (AQ)
AQ-1. Nontoxic soil stabilizers shall be applied according to manufacturer’s specification to all inactive construction areas.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
AQ-2. All grading operations shall be suspended when winds (as instantaneous gusts) exceed 20 miles per hour.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
AQ-3. All stockpiles, access roads, and disturbed or exposed areas shall be watered, as necessary, to prevent airborne dust.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
AQ-4. Pursuant to the California Vehicle Code (Section 23114(e)(4)) (California Legislative Information 2016), all trucks hauling soil and other loose material to and from the construction site shall be covered or shall maintain at least 6 inches of freeboard (i.e., minimum vertical distance between top of load and the trailer).

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
AQ-5. All public roadways used by the project contractor shall be maintained free from dust, dirt, and debris caused by construction activities. Streets shall be swept at the end of the day if visible soil materials are carried onto adjacent public paved roads.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management
Packet Pg. 121
Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(c)--Airport Road City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 Page 4
October 2024
Best Management Practices
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
Biological Resources (BIO)
BIO-1. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), as required by the City of Redding Stormwater Quality Management and Discharge Control Ordinance, will be prepared to address BMPs that will be used to prevent erosion and sediment loss within the project site. BMPs such as silt fence, mulching and seeding, and straw wattles will be placed where needed to prevent sediment from leaving the site during and after construction.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management

BIO-2. Appropriate sediment control measures (e.g., silt fences, straw wattles) will be in place prior to the onset of construction activities near waters of the United States and in project areas where there is a potential for surface runoff to drain into jurisdictional waters. Sediment control measures will be monitored and maintained until construction activities have ceased.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management

BIO-3. High visibility fencing, flagging, or markers will be installed along the edges of the work zone near avoided waters and riparian areas. In addition, equipment entry and exit points; and staging, storage, and stockpile areas must be clearly marked prior to the entry of mechanized equipment or vehicles into the construction area.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management

Cultural Resources (CR)
CR-1. If previously unidentified cultural materials are unearthed during construction, it is the City’s policy that work be halted in that area until a qualified archaeologist can assess the significance of the find. Additional archaeological surveys will be needed if the proposed project undertaking limits are extended beyond the present survey area of potential effect limits.

Construction City/
Construction
Management

CR-2. If human remains are discovered during project activities, all activities near the find will be stopped, and the Shasta County Sheriff-Coroner’s Office will be notified. If the coroner determines that the remains may be those of a Native American, the coroner will contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). Treatment of the remains will be conducted in accordance with further direction of the County Coroner or NAHC, as appropriate.

Construction City/NAHC/
County Coroner

Hazards and Hazardous Materials (HAZ)
HAZ-1. Hazardous materials, including fuels, oils, cement, and solvents will be stored and contained in an area protected from direct runoff and away from areas where they could enter waters of the United States.

Construction City/
Construction
Management

HAZ-2. Construction equipment will be inspected daily for leaks. Leaking fluids will be contained upon detection, and equipment repairs will be made as soon as practicable, or the leaking equipment will be moved offsite.

Construction City/
Construction
Management

Packet Pg. 122
Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(c)--Airport Road City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 Page 5
October 2024
Best Management Practices
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
HAZ-3. Secondary containment such as drip pans or absorbent materials will be used to catch spills or leaks when removing or changing fluids. Secondary containment will be used for storage of all hazardous materials.

Construction City/
Construction
Management

HAZ-4. Spill containment and clean-up materials will be kept onsite at all times for use in the event of an accidental spill.

Construction City/
Construction
Management

HAZ-5. Absorbent materials will be used on small spills rather than hosing down or burying the spill. The absorbent material will be promptly removed and disposed of properly.

Construction City/
Construction
Management

Hydrology and Water Quality (WQ)
WQ-1. All construction work and stockpiling of materials will be confined to the project disturbance area.

Construction City/
Construction
Management

WQ-2. Temporary stockpiling of excavated or imported material will be placed in upland areas. Construction City/ Construction
Management

WQ-3. Excess soil will be used onsite or disposed of at a regional landfill or other appropriate facility.

Construction City/
Construction
Management

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT MITIGATION MEASURES Resource-specific mitigation measures that will be used during project implementation include the following:

Mitigation Measure (MM)
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
Biological Resources (BIO)
MM-1. All on-site construction personnel shall receive instruction regarding the presence of listed species and the importance of avoiding impacts to these species and their habitat.

Preconstruction/
Construction
City/
Construction
Management

Packet Pg. 123
Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(c)--Airport Road City of Redding
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Mitigation Monitoring Program Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 Page 6
October 2024
Mitigation Measure (MM)
Timing/
Implementation
Enforcement/
Monitoring
Verification
(Date and Initials)
MM-2. To compensate for direct impacts on potential habitat for vernal pool tadpole shrimp and vernal pool fairy shrimp, the City will purchase the appropriate mitigation credits from a U.S. Fish and Wildlife (USFWS)-approved mitigation bank or another site to be approved by the USFWS. Permanent impacts will be mitigated at a minimum ratio of 3:1 (three acres preserved for each acre of potential habitat removed). Temporary impacts will be mitigated onsite at a 1:1 ratio.

Construction City/
Construction
Management

MM-3. If vegetation removal or construction activities will occur during the nesting season for birds (February 1 through August 31), a qualified biologist shall conduct a preconstruction survey 7 days before construction activities begin. If nesting birds are found, California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) shall be notified and consulted. An appropriate buffer, as determined by CDFW and the qualified biologist, shall be placed around the nest until the young have fledged. If construction activities cease for a period greater than 7 days, additional preconstruction surveys shall be required.

Construction City/
Construction
Management

Packet Pg. 124
Attachment: ^Mitigation Monitoring and Environmental Commitment Program (4.11(c)--Airport Road Argyle Rd
Airport Rd
Thomason Trl
Cro
ss
roa
ds Dr
Preserve Blvd
Inverness
St
Gibson Ct
Pa
lm
S
pring
s Dr
Pickford Way
Carlsb ad Ln
Indian
W
ell
s L
n
Incl ine Wa
y
Mar lene
Ave
Argyle Rd
Federer Pkwy
Nadal Dr Sa
mp
ras
Dr
Goolagon Blvd
Colby Trl
Hartne
ll A
ve
Old Oregon Trl
Billy Jean Ln
MTG. DATE:

ITEM:

ATTACHMENT:

LOCATION MAPGIS DIVISION

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DEPARTMENT
DATE PRODUCED:
0 400200 Feet-
P:\Engineering\ProProjects\AirportRdPhase_LocationMap.aprx SEPTEMBER 18, 2024

AIRPORT ROAD IMPROVEMENT
) JOO JJJ□□□JJ □ □JJ J□□ JJ J□□□JJ □□□ JJJ □ JJ J□□ JJJ□□□J J J□ - -
-- -- ----

I ,---------
\ I
i----~ I I
L _______ _
J I]□□□ ] JO □ □ ]]] J□□ JJJOO
'--_L_-
Packet Pg. 125
Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2
Response to Public Comments Received on CEQA Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, State Clearinghouse #2024101104

In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) for the Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 was made available to the public and interested agencies for a minimum 30-day review period. The agency review period was managed by the State Clearinghouse (SCH) and closed on November 25, 2024.

The public review period was managed by staff and closed on November 25, 2024.

Two comment letters were received during the public and agency review period . N one of the comments received address the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration findings or the accuracy/completeness of the Initial Study and therefore do not require written responses . In addition, comments received on the public draft IS/MND do not identify new significant impacts or significant new information that wou ld require recirculation of the draft IS/MND pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5.

Comments that are unrelated to the CEQA document h ave been routed to the appropriate department or division, and the commenter has been contacted directly by staff.

Packet Pg. 126
Attachment: ^Comments Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) Letter 1
Packet Pg. 127
Attachment: ^Comments Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) Packet Pg. 128
Attachment: ^Comments Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) Packet Pg. 129
Attachment: ^Comments Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) Packet Pg. 130
Attachment: ^Comments Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) Packet Pg. 131
Attachment: ^Comments Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) Packet Pg. 132
Attachment: ^Comments Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) Letter 2
Packet Pg. 133
Attachment: ^Comments Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project) 530.232.6160 ext. 110
www.frontierce.com
2727 Bechelli Lane
Redding, CA 96002
Image
Ben Abrahamsen, PE
Mechanical Engineer
From: Ben Abrahamsen <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 6:12 PM
To: Lightle, Tiffany <[email protected]>
Subject: Airport Road Phase 2 Project Inquiry

CAUTION: This email originated from outside the City of Redding; please be careful with links or attachments.

Hi Tiffany,

I live on Billy Jean Lane, and I read your mitigated negative declaration statement regarding Airport Road Phase 2 project. Are the plans developed yet for this project? We're thrilled to hear the improvements. Turning left onto Billy Jean lane when travelling northbound on Airport Road has always

been hazardous. Will the new left-turn pocket provide

for safe
turning onto Billy Jean Lane from Airport? Will there be a southbound right turn pocket for Billy Jean Lane as well?

I understand

that you are not the designer, so you may not be able to answer these questions. But, if you're able to pass them along to the responsible party, I would

appreciate it.

Thank you!

- I g
Packet Pg. 134
Attachment: ^Comments Airport Road Improvements Project Phase 2 (4.11(c)--Airport Road Improvement Project Phase 2 Project)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Accept streetlight improvements in Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6 (S -7-03/PD-5-04), as satisfactorily complete.

Fiscal Impact

There will be an incremental increase in the City of Redding ’s (City) utility costs due to t he additional infrastructure . Generally, except for the Storm Drain Utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any increase in annual maintenance costs. The Storm- Drain Utility is pressed with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the improvements. Under this alternative, the City would be inconsistent with a long -standing policy of maintaining streets and infrastructure following the completion of the improvements in accordance with City standards.

Background/Analysis

The developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company , has satisfactorily completed the installation of the streetlights at the Shastina Ranch Subdivision - Unit 6 (S-7-03/PD-5-04). The subdivision is located south of Rancho Road and north of Shasta View Drive . A map showing the location of the subdivision is attached.

The Shastina Ranch Subdivision – Unit 6, (S-7-03/PD-5-04) was approved by the Planning Commission on July 16, 2005, and all conditions of the map have been fulfilled . The final map for the subdivision was approved by the Council on July 16, 2024. Partial acceptance, with the exception of the streetlights, and Resolution No. 2024-097 were both approved by the Council on November 19, 2024. The decorative streetlights were delivered to the developer in the wrong MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Accept Streetlight Improvements in the Shastina Ranch Subdivision - Unit 6 (S-7-03/PD-5-04)
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 135
Report to Redding City Council December 9, 2024
Re: 4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights Page 2

color; the developer sent the streetlights to a powder -coating facility to have the color corrected and have now installed the corrected equipment.

The developer has now completed all the conditioned improvements , for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision – Unit 6 (S-7-03/PD-5-04). It is prudent to accept the streetlight improvements completed to date.

Environmental Review

On June 15, 2005, the Council h eld a public hearing and adopted a resolution approv ing the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S -7-03) and Planned Development Application (PD -5- 04) for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project after adopting a resolution certifying the completeness and adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report, EIR -1-03, on April 15, 2005.

On March 11, 2008, after a public hearing was held, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S -9- 05).

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Site Location Map
Previous Staff Report 071624
Previous Staff Report 111924
Packet Pg. 136
Packet Pg. 137
Attachment: ^Site Location Map (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the Mayor to execute a Subdivision Agreement with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, and approve the final map for Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6 (S-7-03/PD-5-04), thereby, instructing the City Clerk to file the map with the Shasta County Recorder.

Fiscal Impact

There will be cumulative impacts to the Public Works Department due to the increase in public street infrastructure requiring annual maintenance, especially the asphal t pavement. The project will generate an incremental increase in State of California gas -tax funds based on population and point-of-origin sales; however, the increase in these revenues falls short of the anticipated annualized maintenance cost.

In addition, there will be an incremental increase in the City of Redding (City) utility costs due to the additional infrastructure. Generally, except for the Storm-Drain Utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any increase in annual maintenance costs. The Storm- Drain Utility is pressed with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the improvements. Under this alternative, the City would be in consistent with a long -standing policy of maintaining streets and infrastructure following the completion of the improvements in accordance with City Construction Standards.

MEETING DATE: July 16, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Approve Final Map and Execute Subdivision Agreement for Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6 (S-7-03)/Planned Development PD-5-04 Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 138
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Report to Redding City Council July 9, 2024
Re: 4.11(e)--Final Map-Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6 Page 2

Background/Analysis

The Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6 (S-7-03/PD-5-04) was approved by the Planning Commission on July 16, 20 05. Attached is a map showing the subdivision, which is located south of Rancho Road and Shasta View Drive.

The developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company , has submitted the final map and all other required data which has been checked and approved by various City Departments. Relevant subdivision map conditions of approval have been met with the exception of some portions of roadway conditions (placing asphalt concrete, striping, pouring curb/gut ter/sidewalk, centerline monument survey, street name signs, utility manholes, street lights and valve grade adjustments).

The developer has agreed to the execution of a subdivision agreement, has committed to completing these conditions, and has submitte d a related security in the amount of $1,853,864 for the remaining work. The developer has been informed that no occupancy permits will be granted for residences constructed on lots until all related subdivision agreement conditions have been met.

Environmental Review

On June 15, 20 05, the Council held a public hearing and adopted a resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S -7-03) and Planned Development Application (PD -5- 04) for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project after adopti ng a resolution certifying the completeness and adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report, EIR -1-03, on April 15, 2005.

On March 11, 2008, after a public hearing was held, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S -9- 05).

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Subdivision Agreement
Final Map
Performancee Bond

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 139
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 140
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF REDDING, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called Cit y, and Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company , hereinafter called Subdivider, both of whom understand and agree as follows:

RECITALS:

A. Subdivider has presented to City for approval a final subdivision map, hereinafter called Map, entitled:

Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6

B. The Map has been filed with the City Clerk of City for presentation to the City Council of the City for its approval, which Map is hereby referred to and incorporated herein;

C. Subdivider has requested approval of the Map prior to the construction and/or completion of improvements , including all streets, highways, or public ways and public utility facilities which are a part of, or appurtenant to, the subdivision, hereinafter called Subdivision, designated on the Map, all in accordance with, and as requ ired by, the plans and specifications for all or any of said improvements in, appurtenant to, or outside the limits of Subdivision, which plans and specifications are now on file in t he office of the City Engineer:

D. This agreement is executed pursuant to t he provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California.

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the approval of the Map and of the acceptance of the dedications or same thereof, therein offered, and in order to insure satisfactory performance by Subdivider of Subdivider's obligations under said Subdivision Map Act, the parties agree as follows:

1. Performance of Work
Subdivider will do and perform, or cause to be done and performed, at Subdivider's own expense, in a good and workmanlike manner and furnish all required materials, all under the direction and to the satisfaction of City Engineer all of the following work and improvements within, and/or without, the Subdivision, to wit:

Tentative Subdivision Map S-7-03/Planned Development PD-5-04 Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6
See Conditions of Approval

Streets and Circulation
17 thru 38

Sewer, water, and Electric Utilities
39 thru 52

Fire Protection
70 thru 74

APPROVED Packet Pg. 141
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 2
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY

THIS REFERENCE

Subdivider shall also do all work and furnish all materials necessary in the opinion of the City Engineer and on his order to complete the improvements in accordance with the plans and specifications on file as hereinbefore specified, or with any changes required or ordered by City Engineer which in his opinion are necessary or required to complete the work. The funding amount set forth in Exhibit “A” shall not be construed as a limitation on the subdivider’s obligation to fully construct the improvements.

2. Places and Grades to be Fixed by City Engineer
All of said work is to be done at the places, of the materials, in the manner and at the grades, all as shown upon the plans and specifications therefor heretofore approved by City Engineer and which are now on file in his office, and to the satisfaction of said City Engineer.

3. Time and Commencement and Performance
City hereby fixes the time for the commencement of said work on the 16th day of July, 2024, and for its completion to be within 360 calendar days of the date of commencement. Prior to the commencement of work hereunder Subdivider shall notify City Engineer in writing of the date fixed by Subdivider for commencement thereof, so that City Enginee r shall be able to provide services of inspection.

4. Occupancy
Pursuant to Section 17.26.010 of the Redding Municipal Code, occupancy of structures shall not be permitted until all public improvements associated with the subdivision have been duly accepted by City Council.

5. Time of Essence - Extension
Time is of the essence of this agreement; provided, that in the event good cause is shown therefor, the City Council may extend the time for completion of the improvements hereunder. Any such extension may be granted without notice to the Subdivider's surety, and extensions so granted shall not relieve the surety's liability on the bond to secure the faithful performance of this agreement. The City Council shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle Subdivider to an extension.

6. Repairs and Replacements
Subdivider shall replace, or have replaced, or repair or have repaired, as the case may be, all pipes and monuments shown on the Map which have been destroyed or dam aged, and Subdivider shall replace or have replaced, repair or have repaired, as the case may be, or pay to the owner the entire cost of replacement or repairs, of any and all property damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done hereunder whether such property be owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the State of California, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, or by the City or by any public or private corporation, or by any person whomsoever or by any combination of such owne rs. Any such repair or replacement shall be to the satisfaction, and subject to the approval, of City Engineer.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 142
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 3

7. Utility Deposits - Statement
Subdivider shall file with the City Clerk, prior to the commencement of any work to be performed within the area delineated on the Map, a written statement signed by each public utility corporation involved, to the effect that Subdivider has made all deposits legally required by such public utility corporation for the connection of any and all public utilities to be supplied by such public utility corporation within the Subdivision.

8. Permits; Compliance with Law
Subdivider shall obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction of such improvements, give all necessary notices, and pay all fees and taxes required by law.

9. Superintendence by Subdivider
Subdivider shall give personal superintendence to the work of said improvement, or have a competent foreman or superintendent, satisfactory to City Engineer on the work at all times during progress, with authority to act for Subdivider.

10. Inspection by City
Subdivider shall at all times maintain proper facilities, and provide safe access for inspection by City Engineer to all parts of the work, and to the shops wherein the work is in preparation.

Subdivider shall be liable for the payment of all inspection fees and other fees required by the City of Redding within thirty (30) days of invoice.

11. Contract Security
Concurrently with the execution hereof, Subdivider shall furnish one of the following: (1) A bond or bonds in the sum of at least 100 percent of the estimated cost of the improvements remaining to be constructed, plus a contingency cost not to exceed 10 percent of the improvement costs, plus an estimated inflation factor based on the change in the Construction Cost Index over the averaged previous three years’ changes as published in the Engineering News Record, plus an additional amount of 50 percent of the estimated cost of improvements securing payment to the contractor, or (2) and instrument of credi t from an approved financial institution in the same amount, or (3) cash deposit in the same amount.

As to (1) or (2), both the issuer and the form shall be satisfactory to City Attorney.

12. Hold Harmless Agreement
Subdivider hereby agrees to, volunteers and shall, hold City, its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents, and employees, harmless from any liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury, including death, as well as from claims for property damage which may aris e from Subdivider's or Subdivider's contractors; sub - contractors; agents; or employees' operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by Subdivider or by any of Subdivider's contractors, subcontractors, or by any one or more persons directly or indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for Subdivider or any of Subdivider's contractors or subcontractors. Subdivider agrees to, and shall, defend City and its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents, and employ ees from any suits or actions at law or in equity for damages caused, or alleged to have been caused, by reason of any of the aforesaid operations; provided as follows:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 143
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 4
a. That City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Subdivider which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Subdivider of any of the insurance policies described in paragraph 12 hereof.

b. That the aforesaid hold harmless agreement by Subdivider shall apply to all damages, fines, penalties, and claims for damages of every kind suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operations referred to in this paragraph, regardless of whether or not City has prepared, supplied, or approved of, plans and/or specifica tions for the subdivision, or regardless of whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

13. Subdivider's Insurance
Subdivider shall not commence work under this agreement until Subdivider shall have obtained all insurance required under this paragraph and such insurance shall have been approved by Risk Manager as to form, amount, and carrier nor shall Subdivider allow any contractor or subcontractor to commence work on his contract or subcontract until all similar insurance required of the contractor or subcontractor shall have been so obtained and approved. All requirements herein provided shall appear either in the body of the insurance policies or as endorsements and shall specifically bind the insurance carrier. Subdivider shall procure and maintain for the duration of the agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of this agreement by the subdivider, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.

Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance

Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

a. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001), with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.

b. Insurance Services Offices form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, owned, non-owned, and hired, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

c. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of Cali fornia, with statutory limits, and Employers’ Liability insurance, with limi ts no less than $1,000,000 per bodily injury or disease.

Deductibles and Self-Insurance Retentions

Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall be declared to and approved by the City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 144
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 5
Other Insurance Provisions

The general liability and automobile policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

a. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of or in connection with the performance of this agreement by or on behalf of the subdivider; premises owned, occupied or used by the subdivider; and automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the subdivider. The coverage shall contain no special limitations of the scope of protecti on afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.

b. The S ubdivider’s insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers shall be excess of the insurance of the subdivider and shall not contribute with it.

c. The subdivider’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, e xcept with respect to the lim its of the insurer’s liability.

d. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled, except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice has been given to the City.

The Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability insurance shall contain the Insurer’s waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.

Approval of the subdivider’s insurance by the City shall not decrease the extent to which the subdivider may be held responsible for payment of any and all damages resulting from subdivider’s performance under this agreement.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers licensed to do business in the State of California and with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A-:VII.

Verification of Coverage
The Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endor sements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before approval of the agreement and work commences. The City reserves the right to request a certified copy of any or all policies at any time. The subdivider shall provide such

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 145
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 6
policies within thirty (30) days of such a request.

14. Title to Improvements
Title to, and ownership of, all improvements constructed hereunder by Subdivider shall vest absolutely in City, upon completion and acceptance of such improvements by City.

15. Repair or Reconstruction of Defective Work
If, within a period of one year after final acceptance of the work performed under this agreement, any structure or part of any structure furnished and/or installed or constructed, or caused to be installed or constructed by Sub divider or any of the work done under this agreement, fails to fulfill any of the requirements of this agreement or the specifications referred to her ein, Subdivider shall without delay and without any cost to City, repair or replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the work or structure. Should Subdivider fail to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement, or should the exigencies of the case require repairs or replacements to be made before Subdivider can be notified, City may, at its option, make the necessary repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work and Subdivider shall pay to City the actual cost of such repairs plus fifteen (15) percent.

16. Subdivider Not Agent of City
Neither Subdivider nor any of Subdivider's agents or contractors are, or shall be considered to be, agents of City in connection with the performance of Subdivider's obligat ions under this agreement.

17. Cost of Engineering and Inspection
Subdivider shall pay to City the actual cost for all engineering, inspection, and other services furnished by City in connection with the Subdivision, plus the applicable overhead charge in effect at the time. City will furnish a statement of all charges for services performed by City upon request, and Subdivider shall complete payment of such charges within ten (10) days after receipt thereof. Said costs shall be paid in full by the Subdivider prior to acceptance by the City of the Map or improvements.

18. Notice of Breach and Default
If Subdivider refuses or fails to obtain prosecution of the work, or any severable part thereof, with such diligence as will insure its completion within the time specified, or any extensions thereof, or fails to obtain completion of said work within such time, or if the Subdivider should be adjudged a bankrupt, or Subdivider should make a general assignment for the benefit of Subdivider's creditors, or if a receive r should be appointed in the event of Subdivider's insolvency, or if Subdivider or any of Subdivider's contractors, subcontractors, agents, or employees should violate any of the provisions of this agreement, City Engineer or City Council may serve written notice upon Subdivider and Subdivider's surety of breach of this agreement, or of any portion thereof, and default of Subdivider.

19. Breach of Agreement; Performance by Surety or City
In the event of any such notice, Subdivider's surety shall have the duty to take over and complete the work and the improvement herein specified; provided, however that if the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 146
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 7
surety, within five (5) days after the serving upon it of such notice of breach, does not give City written notice of its intention to take over the performance of the contract, and does not commence performance thereof within five (5) days after notice to City of such election, City may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or by any other method City may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of Subdivider and Subdivider's surety shall be liable to City for any excess cost or damages occasioned City thereby; and, in such event, City, without liability for so doing, may take possession of and utilize in completing the work, such materials, appliances, plant, and other property belonging to Subdivider as may be on the site of the work and necessary thereof.

20. Notices
All notices herein required shall be in writing, and delivered in person or sent by registered mail, postage prepaid.

Notices required to be given to: City of Redding
shall be addressed as follows: 777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, California 96001

Notices required to be given to: M D Emmerson
shall be addressed as follows: 19794 Riverside Drive
Redding, CA 96007

Notices of breach or default required to be given to: Marsh USA, Inc. shall be addressed as follows: 1301 Fifth Ave., Ste 1900 Seattle, WA 98101

Provided that any party or the surety may change such address by notice in writing to the other party and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address.

21. Interpretation
The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation of and the resolution of disputes under this Agreement. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party all reasonable costs, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney(s) fees. “Prevailing party” shall include, wi thout limitation, a party who dismisses an action for specific performance or for damages in exchange for sums allegedly due, performance for covenants allegedly breached for consideration substantially equal to the relief sought in the action, or which re ceives from the other party, in connection with any dispute, performance substantially equivalent to any of these.

22. Amendment of Agreement
This document, including any exhibits, contains the entire Agreement between the parties and supersedes whatever ora l or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be altered, amended, or modified except by a writing signed by City and Subdivider.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 147
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 8

23. Enforcement of Agreement
If any portion of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.

24. Disputes
In the event of a dispute between the parties hereto over the meaning of this Agreement, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.

25. Effective Date
The effective date of this agreement shall be the date it is signed by the City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 148
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have executed this Agreement on the days and year set forth below:

CITY OF REDDING,
A Municipal Corporation
Dated: , 2024
By
:

TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor
Attest: Form Approved:

CHRISTIAN CURTIS
City Attorney

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk By: CHRISTIAN CURTIS, City Attorney

M D Emmerson, Si erra Pacific Land and Timber
Company

Dated: , 2024
By
:

M D Emmerson,
Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company
(Subdivider)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 149
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Estimated Amount of Final Map Security
FOR
Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6

ENGINEERING DIVISION
P.O. Box 496071
REDDING, CA 96049-6071
(530) 225-4170
Date: 6/3/2024
Original Construction Estimate: 7-14-22 $6,099,750
Performance Security: Remaining work (provided by engineer) 1,093,725$ (work remaining to be completed) 10% CONTINGENCY 109,373$

3.0% INFLATION 32,812$
Performance Security 1,235,909$
Payment Security: Payment Security 617,955$
(50% of Perf. Security)
TOTAL SECURITY 1,853,864$
Calc'd By: Kyle A. Jones
Construction Manager
(530) 225-4181
[email protected]
Calculated using Prelim. Engineer's
Estimate from SDS, dated 6-3-24
Shastina U6 Security Calcs Page 1
EXHIBIT "A"

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 150
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) EXHIBIT "A"

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 151
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) EXHIBIT "A"

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 152
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 153
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 154
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 155
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 156
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 157
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 158
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 159
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 160
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 161
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 071624 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Partially accept the improvements in S hastina Ranch Subdivision–Unit 6 (S-7-03/PD-5- 04) as satisfactorily complete, with the exception of the streetlights; and (2) Adopt Resolution accepting the S hastina Ranch Subdivision–Unit 6 (S-7-03/PD-5-04) streets for maintenance and operation.

Fiscal Impact

There will be cumulative impacts to the Public Works Department due to the increase in public street infrastructure requiring annual maintenance, especially the asphalt pavement . The project will generate an incremental increase in State of California gas -tax funds based on population and point-of-origin sales; however, the increase in these revenues falls short of the anticipated annualized maintenance cost.

In addition, there will be an incremental increase in the City of Redding (City) utility costs due to the additional infrastructure. Generally, except for the Storm Drain Utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any increase in annual maintenance costs. The Storm- Drain Utility is pressed with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the improvements. Under this alternative, the City would be inconsistent with a long -standing policy of maintaining streets and infrastructure following the completion of the improvements in accordance with City standards.

MEETING DATE: November 19, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(f)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(f)--Accept Improvements and Adopt Resolution Accepting the Streets in the Shastina Ranch Subdivision - Unit 6 (S--03/PD-5-04)
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 162
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Report to Redding City Council November 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(f)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Page 2

Background/Analysis

The developer, Sie rra Pacific Land and Timber Company , has satisfactorily completed the installation of all improvements , with the exception of the streetlights, in Unit 6 of the Shastina Ranch Subdivision, (S-7-03/PD-5-04). The subdivision is located south of Rancho Road and Shasta View Drive. A map showing the location of the subdivision is attached.

The Shastina Ranch Subdivision – Unit 6, (S-7-03/PD-5-04) was approved by the Planning Commission on July 16, 2005, and all conditions of the map have been fulfilled . The final map for the subdivision was approved by the Council on July 16, 2024. All improvements have been satisfactorily completed, with the exception of the streetlights, and all required fees have been paid. The decorative streetlights were delivered to the d eveloper in the wrong color; the developer has already sent the streetlights to a powder -coating facility to have the color corrected. The powder -coating process is lengthy and has been initiated and the streetlights are expected to be delivered and installed within weeks. This subdivision was also required to form a landscape maintenance district, which has been formed.

The developer has completed all the conditioned improvements , with the exception of those listed herein, for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision – Unit 6, ( S-7-03/PD-5-04). It is prudent to accept the improvements completed to date and adoption of a resolution accepting streets for maintenance and operation. Partial acceptance is recommended at this time in order to support and facilitate future stages of subdivision development activities such as the commencement of home construction, as installation of the streetlights is anticipated to be completed shortly and is not required until time of occupancy. A separate acceptance and resolution will be prepared once the streetlights are properly installed.

The resolution has been approved to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review

On June 15, 2005, the Council held a public hearing and adopted a resolution approve the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S -7-03) and Planned Development Application (PD -5- 04) for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project after adopting a resolution certifying the completeness and adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report, EIR -1-03, on April 15, 2005.

On Marc h 11, 2008, after a public hearing was held, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S -9- 05).

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution - Streets and Maintenance
^Site Location Map
Staff Report 071624

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 163
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

ACCEPTING F OR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION THE STREETS
IN SHASTINA RANCH SUBDIVISION, UNIT 6, S-7-03/PD-5-04

WHEREAS, improvements have been satisfactorily completed in Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6, S-7-03/PD-5-04; and

WHEREAS, the City Council ha s considered the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the stree ts in Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6 , S-7-03/PD-5-04, be accepted into the City street system for maintenance and operation by the City;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the City Council that, pursuant to the authority provided in Section 1806 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the streets i n Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 3, S-7-03/PD-5-04 as shown on the map attached and incorporated herein – are accepted into the City street system for maintenance and operation by the City.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution w as introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of November, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 164
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 165
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the Mayor to execute a Subdivision Agreement with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company, and approve the final map for Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6 (S-7-03/PD-5-04), thereby, instructing the City Clerk to file the map with the Shasta County Recorder.

Fiscal Impact

There will be cumulative impacts to the Public Works Department due to the increase in public street infrastructure requiring annual maintenance, especially the asphal t pavement. The project will generate an incremental increase in State of California gas -tax funds based on population and point-of-origin sales; however, the increase in these revenues falls short of the anticipated annualized maintenance cost.

In addition, there will be an incremental increase in the City of Redding (City) utility costs due to the additional infrastructure. Generally, except for the Storm-Drain Utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any increase in annual maintenance costs. The Storm- Drain Utility is pressed with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the improvements. Under this alternative, the City would be in consistent with a long -standing policy of maintaining streets and infrastructure following the completion of the improvements in accordance with City Construction Standards.

MEETING DATE: July 16, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Approve Final Map and Execute Subdivision Agreement for Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6 (S-7-03)/Planned Development PD-5-04 Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 166
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Report to Redding City Council July 9, 2024
Re: 4.11(e)--Final Map-Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6 Page 2

Background/Analysis

The Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6 (S-7-03/PD-5-04) was approved by the Planning Commission on July 16, 20 05. Attached is a map showing the subdivision, which is located south of Rancho Road and Shasta View Drive.

The developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company , has submitted the final map and all other required data which has been checked and approved by various City Departments. Relevant subdivision map conditions of approval have been met with the exception of some portions of roadway conditions (placing asphalt concrete, striping, pouring curb/gut ter/sidewalk, centerline monument survey, street name signs, utility manholes, street lights and valve grade adjustments).

The developer has agreed to the execution of a subdivision agreement, has committed to completing these conditions, and has submitte d a related security in the amount of $1,853,864 for the remaining work. The developer has been informed that no occupancy permits will be granted for residences constructed on lots until all related subdivision agreement conditions have been met.

Environmental Review

On June 15, 20 05, the Council held a public hearing and adopted a resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S -7-03) and Planned Development Application (PD -5- 04) for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project after adopti ng a resolution certifying the completeness and adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report, EIR -1-03, on April 15, 2005.

On March 11, 2008, after a public hearing was held, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S -9- 05).

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Subdivision Agreement
Final Map
Performancee Bond

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 167
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 168
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT

THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF REDDING, a Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called Cit y, and Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company , hereinafter called Subdivider, both of whom understand and agree as follows:

RECITALS:

A. Subdivider has presented to City for approval a final subdivision map, hereinafter called Map, entitled:

Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6

B. The Map has been filed with the City Clerk of City for presentation to the City Council of the City for its approval, which Map is hereby referred to and incorporated herein;

C. Subdivider has requested approval of the Map prior to the construction and/or completion of improvements , including all streets, highways, or public ways and public utility facilities which are a part of, or appurtenant to, the subdivision, hereinafter called Subdivision, designated on the Map, all in accordance with, and as requ ired by, the plans and specifications for all or any of said improvements in, appurtenant to, or outside the limits of Subdivision, which plans and specifications are now on file in t he office of the City Engineer:

D. This agreement is executed pursuant to t he provisions of the Subdivision Map Act of the State of California.

NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the approval of the Map and of the acceptance of the dedications or same thereof, therein offered, and in order to insure satisfactory performance by Subdivider of Subdivider's obligations under said Subdivision Map Act, the parties agree as follows:

1. Performance of Work
Subdivider will do and perform, or cause to be done and performed, at Subdivider's own expense, in a good and workmanlike manner and furnish all required materials, all under the direction and to the satisfaction of City Engineer all of the following work and improvements within, and/or without, the Subdivision, to wit:

Tentative Subdivision Map S-7-03/Planned Development PD-5-04 Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6
See Conditions of Approval

Streets and Circulation
17 thru 38

Sewer, water, and Electric Utilities
39 thru 52

Fire Protection
70 thru 74

APPROVED Packet Pg. 169
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 2
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY

THIS REFERENCE

Subdivider shall also do all work and furnish all materials necessary in the opinion of the City Engineer and on his order to complete the improvements in accordance with the plans and specifications on file as hereinbefore specified, or with any changes required or ordered by City Engineer which in his opinion are necessary or required to complete the work. The funding amount set forth in Exhibit “A” shall not be construed as a limitation on the subdivider’s obligation to fully construct the improvements.

2. Places and Grades to be Fixed by City Engineer
All of said work is to be done at the places, of the materials, in the manner and at the grades, all as shown upon the plans and specifications therefor heretofore approved by City Engineer and which are now on file in his office, and to the satisfaction of said City Engineer.

3. Time and Commencement and Performance
City hereby fixes the time for the commencement of said work on the 16th day of July, 2024, and for its completion to be within 360 calendar days of the date of commencement. Prior to the commencement of work hereunder Subdivider shall notify City Engineer in writing of the date fixed by Subdivider for commencement thereof, so that City Enginee r shall be able to provide services of inspection.

4. Occupancy
Pursuant to Section 17.26.010 of the Redding Municipal Code, occupancy of structures shall not be permitted until all public improvements associated with the subdivision have been duly accepted by City Council.

5. Time of Essence - Extension
Time is of the essence of this agreement; provided, that in the event good cause is shown therefor, the City Council may extend the time for completion of the improvements hereunder. Any such extension may be granted without notice to the Subdivider's surety, and extensions so granted shall not relieve the surety's liability on the bond to secure the faithful performance of this agreement. The City Council shall be the sole and final judge as to whether or not good cause has been shown to entitle Subdivider to an extension.

6. Repairs and Replacements
Subdivider shall replace, or have replaced, or repair or have repaired, as the case may be, all pipes and monuments shown on the Map which have been destroyed or dam aged, and Subdivider shall replace or have replaced, repair or have repaired, as the case may be, or pay to the owner the entire cost of replacement or repairs, of any and all property damaged or destroyed by reason of any work done hereunder whether such property be owned by the United States or any agency thereof, or the State of California, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, or by the City or by any public or private corporation, or by any person whomsoever or by any combination of such owne rs. Any such repair or replacement shall be to the satisfaction, and subject to the approval, of City Engineer.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 170
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 3

7. Utility Deposits - Statement
Subdivider shall file with the City Clerk, prior to the commencement of any work to be performed within the area delineated on the Map, a written statement signed by each public utility corporation involved, to the effect that Subdivider has made all deposits legally required by such public utility corporation for the connection of any and all public utilities to be supplied by such public utility corporation within the Subdivision.

8. Permits; Compliance with Law
Subdivider shall obtain all necessary permits and licenses for the construction of such improvements, give all necessary notices, and pay all fees and taxes required by law.

9. Superintendence by Subdivider
Subdivider shall give personal superintendence to the work of said improvement, or have a competent foreman or superintendent, satisfactory to City Engineer on the work at all times during progress, with authority to act for Subdivider.

10. Inspection by City
Subdivider shall at all times maintain proper facilities, and provide safe access for inspection by City Engineer to all parts of the work, and to the shops wherein the work is in preparation.

Subdivider shall be liable for the payment of all inspection fees and other fees required by the City of Redding within thirty (30) days of invoice.

11. Contract Security
Concurrently with the execution hereof, Subdivider shall furnish one of the following: (1) A bond or bonds in the sum of at least 100 percent of the estimated cost of the improvements remaining to be constructed, plus a contingency cost not to exceed 10 percent of the improvement costs, plus an estimated inflation factor based on the change in the Construction Cost Index over the averaged previous three years’ changes as published in the Engineering News Record, plus an additional amount of 50 percent of the estimated cost of improvements securing payment to the contractor, or (2) and instrument of credi t from an approved financial institution in the same amount, or (3) cash deposit in the same amount.

As to (1) or (2), both the issuer and the form shall be satisfactory to City Attorney.

12. Hold Harmless Agreement
Subdivider hereby agrees to, volunteers and shall, hold City, its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents, and employees, harmless from any liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury, including death, as well as from claims for property damage which may aris e from Subdivider's or Subdivider's contractors; sub - contractors; agents; or employees' operations under this agreement, whether such operations be by Subdivider or by any of Subdivider's contractors, subcontractors, or by any one or more persons directly or indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for Subdivider or any of Subdivider's contractors or subcontractors. Subdivider agrees to, and shall, defend City and its elective and appointive boards, commissions, officers, agents, and employ ees from any suits or actions at law or in equity for damages caused, or alleged to have been caused, by reason of any of the aforesaid operations; provided as follows:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 171
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 4
a. That City does not, and shall not, waive any rights against Subdivider which it may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreement, because of the acceptance by City, or the deposit with City by Subdivider of any of the insurance policies described in paragraph 12 hereof.

b. That the aforesaid hold harmless agreement by Subdivider shall apply to all damages, fines, penalties, and claims for damages of every kind suffered, or alleged to have been suffered, by reason of any of the aforesaid operations referred to in this paragraph, regardless of whether or not City has prepared, supplied, or approved of, plans and/or specifica tions for the subdivision, or regardless of whether or not such insurance policies shall have been determined to be applicable to any of such damages or claims for damages.

13. Subdivider's Insurance
Subdivider shall not commence work under this agreement until Subdivider shall have obtained all insurance required under this paragraph and such insurance shall have been approved by Risk Manager as to form, amount, and carrier nor shall Subdivider allow any contractor or subcontractor to commence work on his contract or subcontract until all similar insurance required of the contractor or subcontractor shall have been so obtained and approved. All requirements herein provided shall appear either in the body of the insurance policies or as endorsements and shall specifically bind the insurance carrier. Subdivider shall procure and maintain for the duration of the agreement insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of this agreement by the subdivider, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors.

Minimum Scope and Limits of Insurance

Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

a. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001), with limits no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage.

b. Insurance Services Offices form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, owned, non-owned, and hired, with limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.

c. Workers’ Compensation insurance as required by the State of Cali fornia, with statutory limits, and Employers’ Liability insurance, with limi ts no less than $1,000,000 per bodily injury or disease.

Deductibles and Self-Insurance Retentions

Any deductibles or self-insured retentions shall be declared to and approved by the City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 172
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 5
Other Insurance Provisions

The general liability and automobile policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

a. The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as additional insureds as respects: liability arising out of or in connection with the performance of this agreement by or on behalf of the subdivider; premises owned, occupied or used by the subdivider; and automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the subdivider. The coverage shall contain no special limitations of the scope of protecti on afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.

b. The S ubdivider’s insurance shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers shall be excess of the insurance of the subdivider and shall not contribute with it.

c. The subdivider’s insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, e xcept with respect to the lim its of the insurer’s liability.

d. Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled, except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice has been given to the City.

The Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability insurance shall contain the Insurer’s waiver of subrogation in favor of the City, its officers, officials, employees, and volunteers.

Approval of the subdivider’s insurance by the City shall not decrease the extent to which the subdivider may be held responsible for payment of any and all damages resulting from subdivider’s performance under this agreement.

Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with insurers licensed to do business in the State of California and with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A-:VII.

Verification of Coverage
The Consultant shall furnish the City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endor sements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before approval of the agreement and work commences. The City reserves the right to request a certified copy of any or all policies at any time. The subdivider shall provide such

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 173
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 6
policies within thirty (30) days of such a request.

14. Title to Improvements
Title to, and ownership of, all improvements constructed hereunder by Subdivider shall vest absolutely in City, upon completion and acceptance of such improvements by City.

15. Repair or Reconstruction of Defective Work
If, within a period of one year after final acceptance of the work performed under this agreement, any structure or part of any structure furnished and/or installed or constructed, or caused to be installed or constructed by Sub divider or any of the work done under this agreement, fails to fulfill any of the requirements of this agreement or the specifications referred to her ein, Subdivider shall without delay and without any cost to City, repair or replace or reconstruct any defective or otherwise unsatisfactory part or parts of the work or structure. Should Subdivider fail to act promptly or in accordance with this requirement, or should the exigencies of the case require repairs or replacements to be made before Subdivider can be notified, City may, at its option, make the necessary repairs or replacements or perform the necessary work and Subdivider shall pay to City the actual cost of such repairs plus fifteen (15) percent.

16. Subdivider Not Agent of City
Neither Subdivider nor any of Subdivider's agents or contractors are, or shall be considered to be, agents of City in connection with the performance of Subdivider's obligat ions under this agreement.

17. Cost of Engineering and Inspection
Subdivider shall pay to City the actual cost for all engineering, inspection, and other services furnished by City in connection with the Subdivision, plus the applicable overhead charge in effect at the time. City will furnish a statement of all charges for services performed by City upon request, and Subdivider shall complete payment of such charges within ten (10) days after receipt thereof. Said costs shall be paid in full by the Subdivider prior to acceptance by the City of the Map or improvements.

18. Notice of Breach and Default
If Subdivider refuses or fails to obtain prosecution of the work, or any severable part thereof, with such diligence as will insure its completion within the time specified, or any extensions thereof, or fails to obtain completion of said work within such time, or if the Subdivider should be adjudged a bankrupt, or Subdivider should make a general assignment for the benefit of Subdivider's creditors, or if a receive r should be appointed in the event of Subdivider's insolvency, or if Subdivider or any of Subdivider's contractors, subcontractors, agents, or employees should violate any of the provisions of this agreement, City Engineer or City Council may serve written notice upon Subdivider and Subdivider's surety of breach of this agreement, or of any portion thereof, and default of Subdivider.

19. Breach of Agreement; Performance by Surety or City
In the event of any such notice, Subdivider's surety shall have the duty to take over and complete the work and the improvement herein specified; provided, however that if the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 174
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 7
surety, within five (5) days after the serving upon it of such notice of breach, does not give City written notice of its intention to take over the performance of the contract, and does not commence performance thereof within five (5) days after notice to City of such election, City may take over the work and prosecute the same to completion, by contract or by any other method City may deem advisable, for the account and at the expense of Subdivider and Subdivider's surety shall be liable to City for any excess cost or damages occasioned City thereby; and, in such event, City, without liability for so doing, may take possession of and utilize in completing the work, such materials, appliances, plant, and other property belonging to Subdivider as may be on the site of the work and necessary thereof.

20. Notices
All notices herein required shall be in writing, and delivered in person or sent by registered mail, postage prepaid.

Notices required to be given to: City of Redding
shall be addressed as follows: 777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, California 96001

Notices required to be given to: M D Emmerson
shall be addressed as follows: 19794 Riverside Drive
Redding, CA 96007

Notices of breach or default required to be given to: Marsh USA, Inc. shall be addressed as follows: 1301 Fifth Ave., Ste 1900 Seattle, WA 98101

Provided that any party or the surety may change such address by notice in writing to the other party and thereafter notices shall be addressed and transmitted to the new address.

21. Interpretation
The laws of the State of California shall govern the interpretation of and the resolution of disputes under this Agreement. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party all reasonable costs, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney(s) fees. “Prevailing party” shall include, wi thout limitation, a party who dismisses an action for specific performance or for damages in exchange for sums allegedly due, performance for covenants allegedly breached for consideration substantially equal to the relief sought in the action, or which re ceives from the other party, in connection with any dispute, performance substantially equivalent to any of these.

22. Amendment of Agreement
This document, including any exhibits, contains the entire Agreement between the parties and supersedes whatever ora l or written understanding they may have had prior to the execution of this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be altered, amended, or modified except by a writing signed by City and Subdivider.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 175
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 8

23. Enforcement of Agreement
If any portion of this Agreement or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.

24. Disputes
In the event of a dispute between the parties hereto over the meaning of this Agreement, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.

25. Effective Date
The effective date of this agreement shall be the date it is signed by the City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 176
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Subdivision Agreement: Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 9
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Developer have executed this Agreement on the days and year set forth below:

CITY OF REDDING,
A Municipal Corporation
Dated: , 2024
By
:

TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor
Attest: Form Approved:

CHRISTIAN CURTIS
City Attorney

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk By: CHRISTIAN CURTIS, City Attorney

M D Emmerson, Si erra Pacific Land and Timber
Company

Dated: , 2024
By
:

M D Emmerson,
Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company
(Subdivider)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 177
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) Estimated Amount of Final Map Security
FOR
Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 6

ENGINEERING DIVISION
P.O. Box 496071
REDDING, CA 96049-6071
(530) 225-4170
Date: 6/3/2024
Original Construction Estimate: 7-14-22 $6,099,750
Performance Security: Remaining work (provided by engineer) 1,093,725$ (work remaining to be completed) 10% CONTINGENCY 109,373$

3.0% INFLATION 32,812$
Performance Security 1,235,909$
Payment Security: Payment Security 617,955$
(50% of Perf. Security)
TOTAL SECURITY 1,853,864$
Calc'd By: Kyle A. Jones
Construction Manager
(530) 225-4181
[email protected]
Calculated using Prelim. Engineer's
Estimate from SDS, dated 6-3-24
Shastina U6 Security Calcs Page 1
EXHIBIT "A"

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 178
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) EXHIBIT "A"

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 179
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights) EXHIBIT "A"

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 180
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 181
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 182
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 183
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 184
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 185
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 186
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 187
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 188
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 189
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 111924 (4.11(d)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 6 Streetlights)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Accept the improvements in S hastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 8 (S-7-03/PD-5-04), as satisfactorily complete; and adopt Resolution accepting the Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 8 (S-7-03/PD-5-04) streets for maintenance and operation.

Fiscal Impact

There will be cumulative impacts to the Public Works Department due to the increase in public street infrastructure requiring annual maintenance, especially the asphalt pavement . The project will generate an incremental increase in State of California gas -tax funds based on population and point-of-origin sales; however, the increase in these revenues falls short of the anticipated annualized maintenance cost.

In addition, there will be an incremental increase in the City of Redding ’s (City) utility costs due to the additional infrastructure . Generally, except for the Storm Drain Utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any increase in annual maintenance costs . The Storm-Drain Utility is pressed with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the improvements. Under this alternative, the City would be inconsistent with a long -standing policy of maintaining streets and infrastructure following the completion of the improvements in accordance with City standards.

MEETING DATE: December 17, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(e)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(e)--Accept Improvements and Adopt Resolution Accepting the Streets in the Shastina Ranch Subdivision - Unit 8 (S-7-03/PD-5-04)
Michael Webb, Public Works
Director
Packet Pg. 190
Report to Redding City Council December 12, 2024
Re: 4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8 Page 2

Background/Analysis

The developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company , has satisfactorily completed the installation of all improvements at Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 8 (S-7-03/PD-5-04). The subdivision is located south of Rancho Road and west of Shasta View Drive. A map showing the location of the subdivision is attached.

The Shastina Ranch Subdivision – Unit 8, (S-7-03/PD-5-04) was approved by the Planning Commission on July 16, 2005, and all conditions of the map have been fulfilled . The final map for the subdivision was approved by the Council on August 20, 2024. All improvements have been satisfactorily com pleted, and all required fees have been paid . This subdivision was also required to form a landscape maintenance district, which has been formed.

The developer has completed all the conditioned improvements for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision – Unit 8 (S-7-03/PD-5-04). It is prudent to accept the improvements and adopt a resolution accepting streets for maintenance and operation.

The resolution has been approved to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review

On June 15, 2005, the Council held a pub lic hearing and adopted a resolution approv ing the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S -7-03) and Planned Development Application (PD -5- 04) for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project after adopting a resolution certifying the completeness and adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report, EIR -1-03, on April 15, 2005.

On March 11, 2008, after a public hearing was held, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S -9- 05).

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution - Streets and Maintenance
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report 082024
Packet Pg. 191
RESOLUTION NO. 2024-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

ACCEPTING F OR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION THE STREETS
IN SHASTINA RANCH SUBDIVISION, UNIT 8, S-7-03/PD-5-04

WHEREAS, improvements have been satisfactorily completed in Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 8, S-7-03/PD-5-04; and

WHEREAS, the City Council ha s considered the recommendation of the Public Works Department that the stree ts in Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 8 , S-7-03/PD-5-04, be accepted into the City street system for maintenance and operation by the City;

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVED by the City Council, pursuant to the authority provided in Section 1806 of the California Streets and Highways Code, that the streets in Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 8, S-7-03/PD-5-04 as shown on the map attached and incorporated herein – are accepted into the City street system for maintenance and operation by the City.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 17th day of December, 2024, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

TENESSA AUDETTE, Mayor

ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 192
Attachment: ^Resolution - Streets and Maintenance (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) Packet Pg. 193
Attachment: ^Location Map (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL

Recommendation

Authorize the Mayor to execute a Subdivision Agreement with Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company; and approve the final map for Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 8 (S-7-03/PD-5-04), thereby, instructing the City Clerk to file the map with the Shasta County Recorder.

Fiscal Impact

There will be cumulative impacts to the City of Redding’s (City) Public Works Department due to the increase in public street infrastructure requiring annual mai ntenance, especially the asphalt pavement. The project will generate an incremental increase in State of California gas -tax funds based on population and point-of-origin sales; however, the increase in these revenues falls short of the anticipated annualized maintenance cost.

In addition, there will be an incremental increase in the City utility costs due to the additional infrastructure. Generally, except for the Storm-Drain Utility, sufficient revenue is generated by monthly use charges to offset any in crease in annual maintenance costs. The Storm-Drain Utility is pressed with increasing requirements that current rates do not cover.

Alternative Action

The City Council (Council) may choose not to accept the improvements. Under this alternative, the Cit y would be inconsistent with a long -standing policy of maintaining streets and infrastructure following the completion of the improvements in accordance with City Construction Standards.

MEETING DATE: August 20, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(a)
FROM:

***APPROVED BY***

[email protected]

[email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(a)--Approve the Final Map and Execute Subdivision Agreement for Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 8 (S-7-03) Planned Development PD-5-04 Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 194
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) Report to Redding City Council August 14, 2024
Re: 4.11(a)--Final Map-Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 8 Page 2

Background/Analysis

The Shastina Ranch Subdivision, Unit 8 (S-7-03/PD-5-04) was approved by the Planning Commission on July 16, 20 05. Attached is a map showing the subdivision, which is located south of Rancho Road and west of Shasta View Drive.

The developer, Sierra Pacific Land and Timber Company , has submitted th e final map and all other required data which has been checked and approved by various City Departments. Relevant subdivision map conditions of approval have been met with the exception of some portions of roadway conditions (placing asphalt concrete, stri ping, pouring curb/gutter/sidewalk, centerline monument survey, street name signs, utility manholes, street lights and valve grade adjustments).

The developer has agreed to the execution of a subdivision agreement, has committed to completing these conditions, and has submitted a related security in the amount of $354,509 for the remaining work. The developer has been informed that no occupancy permits will be granted for residences constructed on lots until all related subdivision agreement conditions hav e been met.

The agreement has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review

On July 5, 20 05, the Council held a public hearing and adopted a resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S -7-03) and Planned Deve lopment Application (PD -5- 04) for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision Project after adopting a resolution certifying the completeness and adequacy of the Environmental Impact Report, EIR -1-03, on April 5, 2005.

On March 11, 2008, after a public hearing was hel d, the Planning Commission adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approved the Tentative Subdivision Map Application (S -9- 05). No further action is necessary.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals

This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Subdivision Agreement
Final Map
Performance Bond
Previous Staff Report

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 195
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 196
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 197
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 198
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 199
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 200
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 201
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 202
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 203
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 204
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 205
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 206
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 207
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 208
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 209
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 210
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 211
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 212
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 213
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 214
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 215
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 216
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 217
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 218
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 219
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) ITEM NO. 6 -]MEETING
DATE ' 7- 5-
05 APPROVED
BY ~C . Y MANA
ER
DATE:

CODE:

FROM:

SUBJECT:CITY OF

REDDING REPORTTO CITY
COUNCILJune15,
2005S-
101- 057/ G-
030- 010/ L- 010- 211- 012/
L- 010- 230 DevelopmentServices
Department--Planning Public Hearingre Shastina
RanchSubdivisionand DevelopmentAgreement;
Adopt Resolution for Tentative SubdivisionMap
Application S- 7- 03 and
PlannedDevelopmentApplicationPD- 5- 04;
AdoptResolutionfor GeneralPlan AmendmentApplicationGPA- 4- 03; Offer
Ordinance
for First Reading for RezoningApplicationRZ- 8- 03;and Offer Ordinancefor First Reading for ShastinaRanchDevelopmentAgreementRECOMMENDATIONAt the conclusion of the publicheating, it is the recommendation of thePlanningCommissionthat the CityCounciladopt the two attached resolutionsand accept the two attached
ordinances
for first readingby title only for approval of the applicationsconstituting the Shastina RanchSubdivision Projectand development.agreement. BACKGROUNDOn February8, 2005, the Planning Commission consideredthe ShastinaRanch SubdivisionProjectProject) and recommendedthat the City Council determinethat the necessary findings are in evidenceand that the Council approve the applicationsconstitutingthe ShastinaRanch SubdivisionProject, and approvethe associatedDevelopment Agreement between the City and the Projectapplicant. On April 15, the CityCounciladopted a resolution and findingsfor certificationof EIR- 1- 03 and deferredaction on the Projectapplication pendinga heating by the ShastaCountyAirportsLand Use Commission ( ALUC). This heatingwas necessarysince theProjectalso necessitatesan amendmentto the ReddingAirport ComprehensiveLand Use Plan ( CLUP)
to' ensureconsistencybetweenthat plan and the City's General Plan. On May 26, 2005, the ALUC unanimouslyapproved the CLUP amendment.PROJECTDESCRIPTIONThe Pro. ject proponentshave requestedapprovalof a proposalto subdivideapproximately224 acres to create 446 single- familyresidential homes; a 7. 6- acre public park;61 acres of open space; and20 acres of industrialland. The openspace will encompassthe Clover Creek floodplain corridor, steepslopes along the west Project boundary, and areas of wetlands. The Project will also include the extensionof Shasta View Drive betweenRancho Road and Airport Road. The subdivisionproposal requiresan amendmentof the Redding General Plan and rezoning
actions to achieve General Plan
consistencyand establisharchitectural
and site- development guidelines.

APPROVED Packet Pg. 220
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) Report to City Council 2 June 15, 2005
A Development Agreement between the City of Redding and the Shastina Ranch Development Company, Inc.

Generally, the proposal is for a 446- 1ot subdivisionwith lot sizes ranging between6, 600 and14, 000 square feet. The planned developmentplan describesfive neighborhoodsdistinguished by lot and home size. Four neighborhoodsare for model homes between1, 200 and2, 800 square feetin size; one neighborhoodis for custom homes. The Projectis illustratedby the attached Shastina Ranch tentative subdivisionmap and planned developmentplan. Distinctive features include varying model home architecture, including two- story and side- entry garage models; six- foot landscapeparkwayswith extensivetree planting along all streets; decorativepaving and landscape at strategicstreet intersectionsto provide traffic calming; decorativestreetlightsand integrated designin streetscape, monumentation, and bridge features.DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENTThe Projectapplicationsare accompaniedby a developmentagreementbetweenthe applicantand the City. The main focusof the agreement is the developer's constructionof the 7. 6- acre public park concurrentwith the Projectdevelopmentin exchangefor parkfee credit and use of Cityproperty for constructionof a section of ShastaView Drive. Theagreementalso provides that a landscapemaintenancedistrict willbe formedfor maintenanceof the park; a small portionof the park may be usedfor storm- water detention, andthe developerwill construct1. 3 miles of publictrail along Clover Creek.

Attachment "B" providesfurther detailson the agreement points. Attachment "F" provides the implementing
developmentagreementordinance. GENERALPLAN AMENDMENT/REZONING The Project necessitatesa GeneralPlan amendment to changethe land use classificationof 101. 5 acres on that portion of the Project site on the east sideof Clover Creekfrom " GeneralIndustry" (82.6 acres) and "Residential, 1 to 2 dwellingunits peracre" (18.9 acres) to " Residential,2 to 3. 5 units per acre." All of the Project area on the west sideof CloverCreekis currentlyResidential, 2 to 3. 5 units peracre." Theproposed446lots representa densityof 2. 6 units peracre.Along the east Project boundary, 20. 8 acres wouldremain classified "General Industry"; this area lies betweenan existingoverhead115 kV PG& E power line and industrial propertyadjacent to AirportRoad. The CloverCreek floodplainand steep slopes alongthe west Project boundary would remainin the " Greenway" classification. Attachments " K" and " L" illustratethe existing and proposedGeneral
Plan land use classificationson the property. The Projectincludes rezoningactions to coincidewith the GeneralPlan amendment and to applythe PD" PlannedDevelopmentOverlay Districtto the entire Projectsite. Essentially, this consistsof rezoningthe property on the east side of Clover Creekto " RS- 3" Residential SingleFamily District.The "PD" District will serve to establishsite and architecturalguidelinesas contained in the planned developmentplan. The " PD" Districtis alsonecessary to permitminordeviationsto thelot width 70 feet) and lot area ( 7, 000 squarefeet) of the " RS- 3" District for about200 of the lots on the east side of the creek. For the most part, thesedeviations are for width or area reductionsof 10 percentof less. The existing and proposed zoning of the
Project
site are illustratedon Attachments "M" and "N." ISSUES Theunderlyingobjective of the applicant is to createa plannedcommunity of five neighborhoodsdistinguishedby lot size and

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 221
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) Report to City Council 3 June 15, 2005
to foster cohesiveness among the neighborhoods. The Planning Commission did not identify any major issues of conformance with the General Plan or standard development policies. The main Project issues were previously considered by the Council in conjunction with certification of the Project EIR. A discussion of these issues is presentedin Attachment " A." They are:

Conformance with General Plan Goals.

Transportation and Circulation.

Eminent Domain for Shasta View Drive.

Consistency with Airport Land Use Plan.

Loss of Industrial Land.

Drainage/ Anderson CottonwoodIrrigation District (
ACID). Public Park/ Landscape
Maintenance District. TRAFFICIMPROVEMENT/FINANCING A primaryconsiderationof the project is financing of improvementsnecessaryto mitigatethe project' s trafficimpacts at the intersection of Chmrt Creek Road/ Victor Avenue/Rancho Road. Thisintersectionis presentlyoperating at a level of service on the verge of warrantingsignalization. The Project trafficstudy concludes that some an~ ount of developmentmay occur without significantlydegradingthe existing servicelevel of the intersection,but that beforeProject buildout, signalizationwill be necessary. Dueto the close spacing of Victor Avenueand RanchoRoad, reconstruction and signalization of
the intersectionare major undertakings. TheProject wouldcontributeapproximately17 percentof the traffic at the Chum Creek Road/ VictorAvenue/Rancho Road. The potential deficiency of the intersectionis substantiallycausedby existingcitywide traffic. Theservice level of theintersectionwould be potentiallyfurtherdegradedby anticipateddevelopmentof other large parcels in the Rancho Road/ShastaView Drivearea. The necessary improvementof the intersectionis a majorconstructionproject and beyond the financialscopeof any individual residentialdevelopmentanticipated in the area. To ensurethat a fundingmechanismwill be in place thatwillsatisfy the fair- share or " proportionality" standardof a project requirementand provide some suretyof the timelyconstructionof the intersection improvements,thefollowingcondition is includedin the recommendedconditions of projectapproval. It is
based upon requiredmitigation identifiedin the Project EIR: 38. a. The developer shall pay the CitywideTransportationDevelopmentImpactFee in accordance with Chapter16. 20 of the ReddingMunicipalCode. Prior to filing of a final map for residentialdevelopmentor issuanceof entitle: ment or building permit for development of the industrialland, the applicant, owner, or successorin interest shallagreeto participate with the City of Reddingin a fundingmechanismto ensure the
constructionof improvementsat the Chum Creek Road/ Victor Avenue/ Rancho Road intersectionsas : necessaryto maintainacceptablelevel-of- serviceoperations. The applicant, owner, or successorin interestshallagreeto participatein this fundingmechanismat a level equivalentto the project's pro ratashareof the improvements.Co Notwithstanding (b) above, up to a maximumof 120 lots may be recordedonthe east side of Clover Creek with soleaccessfrom AirportRoad (i. e., no crossingof CloverCreek)prior to final establishment of a funding mechanismfor the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 222
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) Report to City Council 4 June 15, 2005
facility fee, established by the City Council or its designeeequal to the project's pro rata share of the intersection improvements, shall be made at the time of issuance ofa' building permit.

This condition requires that the project will contribute its fair share to finance the intersection improvements. The final funding mechanism will take the form of an assessment district, benefit fee district, reimbursement agreement, or some combination thereof. In essence, what will be created is a "localized" traffic impact fee program. Such a district(s) may also include the signal at Rancho Road/ Alta Mesa
Drive.The City has already initiateda contactwitha traffic consultantfor preliminarydesign work on the necessary intersection improvements. Attachment 'T' providesa map illustratinglarge undevelopedparcelsin the areaof the Projectsite that maybe includedin a future assessmentor benefit fee district based upon their developmentpotentialthat would generatetrafficat the intersection. At a minimum, staff anticipatesthoselarge undevelopedparcels southof RanchoRoadand westof the Shasta View Drive extensionin the vicinityof Shastina Ranchto be included. Other potential properties include undeveloped residentialparcelsanda commercialsite northof Rancho Road, industrialland along Airport Road, and commercialparcelsat the I- 5/ South BonnyviewRoad interchange. In accordancewith State and City regulations, property- owner notificationand publicheatingswouldbe a part of any iprocessestablishinga benefit fee or assessmentdistrict. In regardto Condition38c, an analysis by the Project trafficconsultantof allowing up to 120 lotsto develop east of Clover Creek with soleaccessoffAirportRoad ( i. e., no extensionof ShastaView Drive) concludesthat this level of developmentwould havenegligible impact on the operationof the Chum Creek Road/ VictorAvenue/RanchoRoadintersection.

Developmentof theselots as theinitial phaseof the project is projectedto increasethe average peak-hour delayattheintersection by a maximumof 4. 8 seconds. TheProjectEIR identifiesan additional delayof less than 5. 0 seconds as belowthe thresholdof significantimpact. Thesole AirportRoad access results in a distributionof trafficmore reliant upon Airport Road than the RanchoRoad/ Chum CreekRoad corridor. The traffic
consultant's analysisis providedin Attachment " J." The requirementsof Condition38 are consistent with General Plan policies in regardto financingnecessarycitywidetraffic improvements, both in terms of timingand fair- shareallocation. General Plan policyacknowledgesthat temporaryreductionsin the desiredlevel- of- service goalswill occurwhile financing is developed to construct traffic improvementsof area or regional benefit. It is generally understood that with a fee- based program, some improvementswill lag behinddevelopment, sincefees are typicallycollectedfromdevelopmentat the timeof issuanceof buildingpermits. During this lag time, the levelsof
service may
decrease until enough funds
are accumulatedto accomplishthe improvement.REQUIREDFINDINGS ENVIRONMENTALIMPACTREPORTEIR- 1- 03 As noted, the ProjectEIR was previouslycertified by the City Council. The followingfindings are incorporated into the resolution for approval of the tentative map and planneddevelopmentplanapplicationand the ordinancefor approvalof the developmentagreement: 1. The project is withinthe scope of the Projectdefinedin Final EnvironmentalImpact Report APPROVED Packet Pg. 223
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) Report to City Council 5 June 15, 2005
o
Changes or alterations have been required in or incorporated into the Project which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effects identified in Final Environmental Impact Report EIR-
1- 03. The City Counciladopts the MitigationMonitoringand Reporting Programincluded in Final EnvironmentalImpactReport
EIR- 1- 03. SHASTINA
RANCHSUBDIVISIONPROJECTA GeneralPlan amendmentand rezoningare legislative acts and, therefore, specific findingsfor approvalare not requiredother than the above environmentalfindings.Certainfindings mustbe foundto be in evidenceto supportapproval of a tentativemap as set forth in the StateGovernmentCode, a PlannedDevelopmentas set forthin Chapter18. 53 of the City ZoningOrdinance, and a DevelopmentAgreementas set forthin Chapter18. 20 of the City Zoning Ordinance. These findingsof approvalare delineated in the resolutionand ordinance ofl~ red for approvalof the Project and developmentagreementand attachedto the report (Attachments "
E" and " F"). AL TERNA TIVESAND IMPLtCATIONSOF THE
AL TERNATIVES At the conclusionof the publichearing, the City Council has the following altematives: SHASTINA
RANCH SUBDIVISIONPROJECTDetermine that the ShastinaRanchSubdivision Project and Development Agreetnentas describedin this report andthe recordis withinthe scope of the Projectas defined in Final EIR-
1- 03. ( Planning CommissionRecommendation)Approve the ShastinaRanchSubdivisionProject, consisting of the followingelements, by adoptionof the necessaryresolutions and ordinancesprovided as Attachments "C," " D," " E,"
and " F." ( PlanningCommissionRecommendation)
Tentative SubdivisionMap Application S-
7- 03. General
Plan Amendment ApplicationGPA-
4- 03. Rezoning Application
RZ- 8- 03. Planned DevelopmentPlan PD- 5- 04. Shastina Ranch Development
Agreement.Thetentative map conditions of approval are providedas Attachment "G." o Approve in concept the ShastinaRanch SubdivisionProjectwith modificationsto the tentative map, planneddevelopmentplan, or other element of the Projectapplications.

Staff wouldreturn with revised resolutionsand/ or ordinancenecessary to supportthe modifications.Deny the ShastinaRanch SubdivisionProject basedupon a determinationthat the tentativemap, planneddevelopmentplan, GeneralPlan amendment, andrezoning are not consistentwith the General Planor that the Project would be detrimentalto the health, safety, or welfare of the public. The Council should be specific in the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 224
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) Report to City Council 6 June 15, 2005

CONCLUSION
It is the opinion of staffthat the Project demonstrates conformance with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance as outlined in this staff report and attachments. Further, it is staffs opi~fion that with the application of the attached conditions which incorporate the Project EIR mitigations, all necessary findings for approval can be made. While residential expansion within the vicinity of an airport is a land use planning concern, the Project would be in conformance with all applicable policies of the Airport Plan. The loss of a larger industrial site is a concern, but will be offset by the pending creation of the Stillwater Business Park. When completed, the Shastina Ranch park and trail will assist the City in achieving the General Plan goal of 10 acres of improved park per 1, 000population. When the Planning Commission recommended the project to the Council, it unanimously praisedthe Shastina Ranch representatives and staff for working together to ensure that this area reflects the best of Redding-- its character, its quality, andits visionfor the future. Staffrecommendsthat the City Counciladoptthe attached resolutionsfor approvalof General Plan AmendmentApplication GPA- 4- 03, Tentative SubdivisionMap Application S- 7- 03, and Planned DevelopmentPlan PD- 5- 04; and accept the attached ordinancesfor approval of Rezoning Application RZ-8- 03 andthe Shastina RanchDevelopmentAgreement
for first reading
by title only. A TTA
CHMENTSA. Issues Discussion
B. Main DevelopmentAgreement
Points C. Resolution approvingGPA-4-
03 D. Ordinanceapproving RZ-
8- 03 E. Resolution approvingS-
7- 03 and PD- 5- 04
F. Ordinance approvingDevelopmentAgreementG.

Tentativemap conditionsof approval H.

Policy 1703, Eminent Domain,
findings.I. Potential traffic
benefitdistrict map
J. Traffic analysis
120 lots/ Airport Road
K. Existing General Plan
L. Proposed GeneralPlan
M. Existing zoning N.

Proposedzoning O. Existing
AirportCLUP P. ProposedAirport CLUP Q. Tentativemap ( 4) R. Planned DevelopmentPlan S. EIR- 1- 03 ( previouslyforwarded)* A copyof Final EnvironmentalImpactReportEIR- 1- 03 for the Shastina RanchProject was previously provided to the Council for its meetingon April 5, 2005, at which timethe
Council certified
the EIR. Ifa Council Member would like
anothercopy of the EIR, please
contact the City Clerk. DD:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 225
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) ATTACHMENT " A"

SHASTINA RANCH SUBDIVISION

EXPANDED ISSUES DISCUSSION
CONFORMANCE WITH GENERAL PLAN GOALS The Project includes several characteristics of sound residential growth practices and furtherance of General Plan goals as follows:

The Project will provide an aesthetic master plannedcommunity of five " villages" distinguished by lot and home size, but also sharing certain common neighborhood site and architectural design elements and a neighborhood park, fostering neighborhood cohesiveness. Features include quality architecture, project entrance features, streetscape landscape, integration of open space, and distinctive streetlighting. (General Plan Goals CDDg, CDD10, CDD12) The project provides a range of lot sizes and well- designed housing products, including neighborhoodunits with homes specificallydesignedfor smalllots, fostering efficientuse of land. ( GeneralPlan Goals CDD10,
CDD11) o The developmentwill preserve approximately61 acres, or 27 percent, of the total project land areain publicand private open space. This land encompassesareasfor active recreation ( public park), passive recreation (public trail), preservationof sensitive habitat (vernal pools), and public protection ( floodplain). (GeneralPlan Goals CDD3, CDDS, CDD10, NR3, NR5 through NR10, HS2,
R2) Immediate recreation opportunitieswill be providedto residentsthrough dedicationof land and constructionof a public neighborhoodpark and public trail systemin conjunction with subdivision development. (GeneralPlan GoalsT8, R4, R5, RI0, RI 1, PF15) o The project design transfers residentialdensityrights withinthe project boundariesto avoid sensitive wetland habitat ( approximately24 acres). ( GeneralPlan Goals NR3, NR5th_ rough
NRIO) 6. The subdivisiondesign promotes pedestrianismthrough: (GeneralPlan Goals CDD10, CDD16, CDD17, T5, T6,
T8) Provisionof a ten- foot- wide pedestrian/ bicycle
path within 35- foot- wide
landscapedparkways alongShasta View Drive. b. Provision of sidewalksseparatedfrom the vehicle lanesby a
landscaped parkwayalong all internal streets. Provision of landscapedsidewalk connections between
internalstreets and Shasta View Drive.do Provision of connectionsbetweenthe internal street systemand the
open- space
trail system. II£ M ( o4 ATTACHMENTL% APPROVEDPacket Pg. 226
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) The project will enhance the aesthetics of the public- street systemby incorporationof a landscapedtraffic circle, landscapemedian, and widened landscapedparkwaysin Shasta View Drive. ( GeneralPlan Goals CDD16, CDD17,
T3) o Subdivision improvementspromotethe useof public transit through incorporationof bus stop improvementson Shasta View Driveand pedestrian connectionsbetween internal streets and Shasta View Drive. ( GeneralPlan Goals CDD10, T3,
T9) The subdivisionis locatedin proximityto existing employmentcentersalong Airport Road and the future Stillwater BusinessPark. ( GeneralPlan Goal CDD 10) 10. The subdivisionis in an areaof existingand plannedpublic infrastructure. The siteis withinthe Clover Creek Sewer Trunk Line Assessment District. The projectwill resultin the dedicationof land for a public well site and constructionof a 24- inch water main betweenRanchoRoad and AirportRoad as specifiedby the City' s Master Water Plan. ( General Plan Goals
CDD2, PF1) TRANSPORTATION
AND CIRCULATIONThe traffic analysisconcludesthat the Project will actually generatesubstantiallyfewer vehicletrips than whatwould be expected from developmentunder the existing " Industrial" General Plan classificationson the Projectsite. This is due to the proposedamendmentwhich wouldreclassify82. 6 acres from " GeneralIndustry" to "Residential, 2 to 3. 5 units per acre." " General Industry" has a much higher per- acre trip- generation factorthan residentialdevelopment.

TheProject is estimatedto generate7, 106 averagedaily trips (ADT) as comparedto 14, 988 ADTs resultingfrom buildout under
the existingGeneral Plan. The EIR trafficstudy also assesses the impactsadditionalproject-related vehicletrips will have on the streetsegmentsandintersectionsin the vicinityof the Project. TheEIR contains mitigationmeasuresto offset impacts to the street system. Wherethe Project generates25percentor moreof the traffic at an impactedintersectionor street segment, the Project is responsiblefor full impact mitigation. Wherethe Projectgeneratesless than25percentof the traffic at an intersectionor street section, the Projectis responsiblefor its pro rata share of the impact mitigation. The 25 percent thresholdis establishedto meetthe "proportionality" test required of a mitigation. Essentially, an individualproject cannotbear the entire responsibilityfor eliminating a traffic deficiency thatis caused substantiallymore by existingcitywidetraffic volumes than by the project itself. The EIRtrafficmitigations are reflected in the tentativemapConditions21, 22, 23, 37, and 38. Approvalof theproject will also establish a right- of- way width for Shasta View Drive. General Plan TransportationPolicy T3A and Community Development and Design Goal CDD16 and PolicyCDD16Bpromoteimprovingthe visual attractivenessof the City's arterialand collectorstreet systemsin part by creating wider rights- of- way to allowincorporationof landscapedmediansand parkways. Toward this end, Shasta View Drivethrough the Shastina RanchSubdivisionis designedwitha 142- foot-wideright-of- way, whereas, the typical standardused in the past is 96 to 110 feet. The Shastina Ranch projectprovides an idealopportunityto implement thenew General Plan policies, since the area south of RanchoRoad
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 227
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) by existing road segments developed on the basis of old standards. The widened right- of- way willafford a 16- foot- wide landscapedmedian and 35-foot-wide landscaped parkwayswith a 1 O- foot-wide pedestrian/bicycle path separatedfrom the curb. It should be noted that the parkwaywidthis basedupon twovehicletravel lanes. At the point in time in the future that the third and fourthvehicletravel lanesbecome necessary, the parkway width will be reduced to accommodatethe additionallanes. The design also includes a largetraffic circle at the main projectintersectionon the west side of Clover Creek. This will avoid the need for future signalizationat the intersection.EMINENTDOMAINFOR SltASTAVIEW DRIVE The Project site doesnot currentlyhave public- streetaccess. Such access must be provided by off- site constructionof Shasta ViewDrive frombothRancho Road and Airport Road :
to accommodatefull buildout. At the present time, the applicanthas not acquiredthe necessaryright-of- way to constructShastaView Drive off- site to either RanchoRoad or Airport Road, althoughstaffis aware thatnegotiations havebeen initiated. To reach Airport Road, 500 feet ( 0. 1 mile) of right-of-way is necessary acrossa single parcel. ToreachRanchoRoad, 2, 950 feet ( 0. 5 mile) is necessary. Of thisamount, approximately1, 800 feet is on a parcel for which the Cityhasreceiveda subdivisionapplicationthat would necessitatededicationof this right- of- way for approval. Another1, 000 feetis on City propertyadjacentto the Project site.One hundredfifty feet would be necessaryfi' om an interveningparcel.Aninabilityby the applicant to acquirethe necessaryright- of- way createsa potential for requestinguse of the City' s powerof eminentdomainto acquirethe property. The decision to utilizeeminentdomainrests with the City Council and is basedupon a finding of publicinterestand necessityestablishedin the StateCode. City Policy 1703 establishescertainfindings that must be fbund to be in evidencein order to support a tentative map conditionwhich requires an
off-sitestreetimprovementthatcouldlead to the need for use of eminentdomain. These findings are in Attachment "I." It is the opinion of the PlanningCommissionand staffthat the necessary findingsare in evidence.Shasta View Drive has beenidentified on the GeneralPlan as a majorlinkbetweenRancho Roadand Airport Roadsince1985. Thisstreetlink is necessaryto provide for the logical development of a large expanseof land anticipatedto be developedby the GeneralPlanin a manner that does not overburdenexisting streets andto provide safe and adequateaccess to the public.It is important to notethat staff is notrecommending, nor is the Councilobligated to make, a decisionon the use of eminentdomain at this time. It is the applicant's desireand expectation that an agreementwill be reachedwith the affectedlandownersto acquire the necessary street easement. The purposeof the discussionhereis to establishthat in the opinion of the City Council, shouldeminentdomainbecome necessary, the required findingscan be made. Althougha decisionto use eminent domainis not a part of this hearing, if the Council doesnot feel that thepotential
use of eminentdomain for the project is appropriate, the Council couldrequire a modification to the project conditions of approval.AIRPORTLANDUSE PLANThe Shasta County Airports LandUseCommission has approved an amendmentto the Redding MunicipalAirport CLUP upon a determinationthat the ShastinaRanchSubdivisionis in conformancewith applicable CLUP noise and safety
policies, an FAA approved amendment to the
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 228
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) NOISE
The Project site is approximately 1, 200feet outside of the estimated 60dB CNEL noise contour associated with projected ~firport operations. The City's General Plan establishes 60dB CNEL as the acceptableexterior sound level threshold in a residential area. The airport CLUP utilizes a lower standard of 65dB CNEL based upon State airport standards. ( CLUP Policy 2b) The tentative map conditions require that an avigation easement be granted to the City of Redding for flight operations associated with the airport prior to recordation of a final subdivision map. ( CLUP Policy 2f)
SAFETY
A portion of the Project site is located within the Outer Approach Zone of crosswind Runway

12. The safety zones for Runway 12 shown on the Airport Plan are based upon a previously planned northwest extension of the runway. Due to the lack of current or planned use of this runway, the Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA) has approvedan amendment of the Airport Facilities Plan to eliminate the planned extension of this runway. Elimination of the runway extension significantly reduces the area of the Project site within the Outer Approach Zone as depicted on the Airport Plan. Based upon the existing terminus of Runway 12 and safety zone configuration standards, approximately 30.5 acres of the Project site are located within the Outer Approach Zone.

The Airport Plan establishes a maximum residential density of 3 units per acre in an Outer Approach Zone. Shastina Ranch proposes 44 lots within the Outer Approach Zone, which is an overall density of 1. 4 units per acre. ( CLUP Policy 3a) The dwelling units within the Outer Approach Zone are concentrated at the far end, creating an undeveloped expanse of 22. acres within the Outer Approach Zone, as opposed to disjointed open areas between houses dispersedthrough the safety zone. This creates a greater expanse of open space for flight emergencies. ( CLUP Policy 3b) Clustering of homes within, safety zones and in general around airports to create more open areas is encouraged by the State Division of Aeronautics. In responding to the Project EIR, the State did not object to the Project design.

LOSS OF INDUSTRIAL LAND The Project will cause the loss of a large industrial site near the Airport Road industrial corridor as a result in the General Plan amendment and subdivision. The City's General Plan more than accommodates the projected demand for industrial acreage. The General Plan EIR identifies 3, 282 acres of land designated "General Industry." Of this amount, approximately 500 acres were in use as of 1999, with a projected demand of 361 additional acres by 2020. However, there are very few large industrial sites, such as the subject property, with ready access to roads and utilities that could accommodate larger industrial and manufacturing uses. That market need is now planned to be accommodated by the 678- acre Stillwater BusinessPark plannedon propertyeastof the Redding MunicipalAirport. Phase1 of the businessparkis expectedto be completein
2007. ExpandedIssues Discussion, Attachment " A" Page APPROVEDPacket Pg. 229
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) Staffbelieves that the developmentof the Stillwater Business Park will satisfy the community's need for large industrial sites. On a related issue, reclassification of the property to allow development of Shastina Ranch could serve to facilitate development of the Stillwater Business Park by providing opportunities for nearby housing to satisfy the demand created by employment within the park.

DRAINAGE/ ANDERSON COTrONWOOD IRRIGATION DISTRICT (ACID) A segmentof the Anderson CottonwoodIrrigation District (ACID) canal systemlies alongthe west boundaryof the Project site betweenthe proposed subdivisionand Chum Creek. When constructedin the early 1900s, this canal began interceptingrunoff from that portionof the Shastina Ranchsite withinthe Chum Creek watershed. The EIR estimatesthat approximatelyone-third of thesite is within this watershed. A subsequentmore refinedestimateby the Project engineerconcludes thatapproximately23. 5 acres,or 10 percent, is actually draining toward
ChumCreek. The upperreach of this canal segment presently receives storm- waterrunoff from the substantialdevelopmentthat hasoccurred north of RanchoRoad. In his commentson the Project EIR, the GeneralManagerof the ACID has statedthat this City drainagehas contributedto damageof the canal andthat ACIDis opposed to any additionaldevelopmentthat will increase runoff into the canal. To addressthis comment, the EIR mitigationsand subdivision map conditionsprecludedevelopmentof the 23. 5 acres of the subdivisionin the Chum Creekwatershed until an appropriate method of conveyingwater to Chum Creekis approvedby the City Engineer in consultationwith the ACID. The EIR offers two potential solutions. This restrictionwillaffect40 of the westernmostlots shown on
the subdivision map. The ShastinaRanchsite has a comparativelyminimalimpact on the canalin relation to the aforementionedexistingdevelopmentand the potentialfuturedevelopmentof the large vacantparcels northwest of ShastinaRanch. Staff has initiateddiscussionswith the ACID GeneralManager and the engineersrepresentingShastinaRanch andthe owners of these vacant lands toward an overall solutionin which all
parties may participate. PUBLIC PARK/LANDSCAPEMAINTENANCEDISTRICTAn integral element of the subdivisiondesignis a 7. 6- acrepublic park located adjacentto CloverCreeknear the centerof thenew neighborhood.This parkis the main emphasis of the Project development agreement. The agreementprovidesthat in addition to the parklanddedication required by the City SubdivisionOrdinance, the developershall designand constructthe actualpark improvements and forma landscapemaintenancedistrictto maintainthe park. In exchange, the developerwill receivecredit toward the Project' s parksand recreationdevelopmentimpactfee obligationand willbe allowedto utilizea portion of
the park for storm-waterdetention.The parkamenitieswill be basedupon a LargeNeighborhoodPark, as definedin the Parks, Trails and Open SpaceMaster Plan (Parks MasterPlan) and includea multi- purposeturf field, basketballcourt( s), horseshoe and bocce ball courts, picnic area, playground, and trails. The parkimprovementswill be constructedin phases by the developeras the subdivisionbuilds out, beginningwith the 80th home. This would be the first neighborhoodpark with maintenancefunded througha landscapemaintenancedistrict (LMD). Funding park maintenancethrough an LMDis identifiedin the ImplementationStrategy of theParks MasterPlan. Staff believesthis is appropriatein this case, sincealthoughthe parkwill beavailableto the public in general, it. is a directamenityto the Shastina RanchSubdivision, and its residents will derive the greatest direct benefit.

APPROVEDPacket Pg. 230
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) A portion of the park site will also be designed to accommodate storm- water detention.

Such project- specific detentionfacilities are commonlymaintainedby LMDs. The agreementidentifiesless active park areas where short- term inundationwill occur. The Community ServicesAdvisory Commissionhas endorsedthe park site location and concept of the developmentimpact fee creditagreement. Uponits review, the Commissionalso " encouragedthe developersto enlargethe park size to ten acres." The City GeneralPlan contains a standard of 10 acres of improvedparklandper 1, 000 population; the projectedpopulation of thesubdivisionis 1, 088 people. The GeneralPlan standardis basedupon total parkfacilities available to all residentson a citywide basis. This includescommunityparks ( e. g., Caldwell Park/ Enterprise Park), neighborhood parks, communitycenters, open-space trail systems, etc. The developersfeel the7. 6- acre park site is appropriatefor the Projectfor the followingreasons: The 7. 6- acre park will exceed the maximumland- area dedicationsupportedby State law Quinby Act) andthe City Subdivision Ordinance. Under theseregulations, a 5. 43- acre park site may be required. The collocation of the storm-water facilitymay reduce
the functionalrecreationarea of the park, but not significantly. Aspartof the Project, the developerwill also construct1. 3 miles of public trail in the open space along both sides of Clover Creek. TheParks Master Plan allows that provisionof publictrailsbe creditedtowardpark-acreage goals.

Public trailof 1. 3
miles in length is equivalentto approximately6 acres of parkland.3. The developerhas agreed to widenthe sidewalkin theparkwaysalong Shasta
View Driveto 10 feet to create a joint pedestrian/bicyclepath.The City' s GeneralPlan and Parks MasterPlan call for a future neighborhoodpark on thewest side of ShastaView Drive.

The General Plan also identifies a futureschool site in this area.

Preliminarydiscussions have alreadyoccurredwiththePachecoSchool Districtregarding a joint school/ park site. This would be a largerneighborhoodpark, providing moreextensiveball fields and other recreationopportunitiesserving the
ShastinaRanchSubdivisionand the largerundeveloped area west of Shasta View Drive.

5. The developer'
s
willingness toconstruct
and maintain park improvements with developmentof
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 231
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) ATTACHMENT " B"

SHASTINA RANCH SUBDIVISION

DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT POINTS
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT The Project is accompaniedby a development agreement between the City and the applicant, ensuring that the expectations of both parties for the Project will be realized ( Attachment " H"). The applicants and the City's obligations under the agreement are outlined by Sections 6 and 7 and Exhibit " D," which provides details for the park construction and fee credit. The main focus of the agreement is as follows.

The applicant will:

Dedicate land for, design, engineer, obtain necessary permits, and construct a 7. 6- acre public neighborhoodpark. Constructionof the park will be phasedas developmentof the subdivision occurs. The park will be maintainedthrough formationof a landscape maintenance district. Dedicateland for, design, engineer, obtain necessarypermits, and construct approximately1. 3 milesof public trail systemalong Clover Creek (of which approximately0. 37 mile is located outsidethe Project boundaryon City-
ownedland). 3. Dedicatelandfor a
City well. The
City will: 1. Allowuse of City propertyto satisfy Projectrequirements for constructionof a portion of Shasta View Drive and public
trail improvements.2. Allowuseof a portionof the publicpark to satisfy Project storm- water detention requirementsthrough
appropriatepark design. Utilize existing and/or futuremechanismsin placeat the time of developmentto reimburse and/ or credit the developerfor costs above the Project' s pro ratashareassociatedwith constructionof the public park, utility oversizing, and off- site traffic- circulationimprovements.The subdivisioncould generateover $ 1, 600, 000 in parks fees based on the currentfee structure.Staff anticipatesthat most of thesefeeswill be credited.

Once the parkis complete, any unused
creditwill be paidto the City.A development agreementis subjectto a CEQAdetermination; the
Project
EIR is
adequate
for
This purpose. 6- 17- 05 STAF\S703-

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 232
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) RESOLUTION NO. 2005-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

REDDING AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN DIAGRAM OF

THE CITY BY ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
GPA-
4- 03 WHEREAS, following the required publichearing, the CityCouncilof theCity of Reddingdeterminedthat the General PlanDiagram be amended by incorporatingtherein the changescontained in General Plan AmendmentGPA- 4- 03, involving5370 RanchoVista Way and 5490 Rancho Vista Way as followsand as shown on the map attachedhereto:5370 Rancho VistaWayfrom "Residential, 1 to 2 dwellingunits peracre" to "Residential,2 to 3. 5
dwellingunits per acre." That portion of 5490 RanchoVista Way east of Clover Creek from " GeneralIndustry" toResidential, 2 to 3. 5 dwellingunits per acre" and "GeneralIndustry."WHEREAS, on May 26, 2005, the ShastaCounty Airport Land Use CommissionadoptedResolution2005- 002, finding that the proposed land use designationsare consistentwiththe objectivesand policies of the ReddingMunicipalAirport ComprehensiveLand Use Plan; and WHEREAS, following the requirednoticein accordancewith law, the City Councilheld a publichearing andcarefullyconsidered the evidence at the hearing; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVEDthat the City Council, having reviewedEnvironmentalImpactReport EIR-1- 03, statingthat with mitigationthe project has no significantimpact upon the environment, herebyamendsthe General Plan Diagram of the City of Reddingby incorporatingtherein the changescontainedin General Plan AmendmentGPA-4- 03 as shown,
on the maps attached andmadea part hereof.BE IT FURTHERRESOLVED, by the City Councilof the City of Reddingthat thisresolutionshall not have the force and effectof law and shall not become effective unlessand until OrdinanceNo. __., approvingthe DevelopmentAgreement by and between the City of Redding and ShastinaRanch DevelopmentCompany, Inc., shall be introduced, adopted, and thereafterbecomeslegallyeffective pursuant to the terms
provided
for
in thatordinance.Rancho

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 233
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced, read, and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council on the__th day of__ 2005, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

JOHN R. MATHENA, Mayor
Attest: Form Approved:

CONNIE STROHMAYER, City Clerk RICHARD A. DUVERNAY, City Attorney 6-
6- 05 RESO\ CC\ G
PA403- RanchoVista-DD- CC. wpd RanchoVistaWay,

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 234
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) SHASTNA ~ NC" SUBD~ION-( ,,/'' / i souRc,: GIS

DIVISION
PROPOSEDGENE~ L PLAN .~. OAT*: I
I
I ~
SHASTiNA RANCH SUBDIVISIONXP~ N~.~
N JANUARY24, 2005 [IR-~-05, S- 7- 05, 6PA- 4-03 ~ RZ-

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 235
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) ORDINANCE NO.

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING AMENDING

THE ZONING MAP OF THE REDDING MUNICIPAL CODE

RELATING TO THE REZONING OF CERTAIN REAL

PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF REDDING ( RZ-
8- 03) The CityCouncilof the City of Redding doesordain as follows:SECTION1. That the boundariesof the districtsreferredto in Section18. 01. 050 of the ReddingMunicipalCode, as designatedon a map entitled "ZoningMap of theCity of Redding, California,"datedJanuary7, 2003, are herebyalteredas set forth on the map attachedhereto andmade a part
hereof
by:

REZONING:

FROM: TO:Propertyat 5370 Rancho
Vista Way RS- 2" Residential
Single Family DistrictRS- 3- PD" Residential Single
Family District
with
Planned
Development
Overlay DistrictREZONING:FROM: TO: Property
at 5490 RanchoVista Way RS- 3" Residential Single
Family
District and " GI" GeneralIndustrial DistrictRS- 3-
PD" ResidentialSingle Family District with PlannedDevelopmentOverlayDistrict, " GI"
General Industrial
District,
and "
OS" OpenSpace District e REZONING:

FROM: TO: Propertyat 2961
Rancho Vista Way RS- 3" ResidentialSingle Family
District RS-
3- PD" ResidentialSingleFamily Districtwith Planned Development OverlayDistrict SECTION2. On the basisof the informationcontainedin EnvironmentalImpactReport E[ R- 1- 03, the City Council finds that, with
mitigation, the subjectrezoning will not have a significanteffect on the environment.SECTION3. This ordinance shall not take effect untilsuch timethat the City Attorney certifies to the City Clerk that: ( 1) City of ReddingResolutionNo. 2005-__, pertaining to GeneralPlan AmendmentGPA- 4- 03, becomeslegallyeffective
and ( 2) that a
minimumof30days

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 236
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) I HEREBY CERTIFY that this ordinance was introduced and read at a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of ., 2005, and was read and adoptedat a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of , 2005, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Attest:.

JOHN R. MATHENA, Mayor
Form Approved:

CONNIE STROHMAYER, City Clerk RICHARD A. DUVERNAY, City Attorney 2-
1- 05PRO~ ORD\
RZ704- Lowes- TA. wpd ShastinaRanch. RZ-
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 237
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) II
sou.
c~:

GISDIVISIONPROPOSED ZONING MAP D~LOPMENTSER~ CES D~ ENT I I ','. SHASTiNA RANCH SUBDIVISION0 ~ I~ 1~ 0 AND FACIU~ P~ N AREADWG. NO: DATE PRODUCED:XP~
NN' NOXJANUARY 24, 2005 EIR. I- 05, S- 7- 03, GPA- 4-

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 238
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) s.,.~ ~.
c.
su.~,~s,~-~....~: ~'.~ ~ I1: x..._
CHURNCFEEK ............ , ~,~
rr '- ~ ]~ o~.~:

O~
S
DIVISlO~
PROPOSEDZONINGMAP ~' ~:

DE~ LOPMENT SER~CESDEP~ EHT I I ,'. SHASTiNA RANCH SUBDIVISION ~:0 ~ 10~ I~0 AND FACIM~ P~ N AREA A~ACHUENT:DWG. NO: DATEPRODUCED:XP~ NINGX JANUARY 24, 2005 EIR. I- 05, S- 7- 03, GPA- 4- 03 & RZ- 8.-

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 239
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) iRESOLUTION NO. 2005-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

ADOPTING FINDINGS TO APPROVE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION
MAP APPLICATION S- 7- 03 AND
PLANNED DEVELOPMENTAPPLICATIONPD- 5- 04 FOR
THE
SHASTINA RANCH SUBDIVISIONPROJECTWHEREAS, on ., 2005, the City Council consideredEnvironmentalImpact ReportEIR- 1- 03 and its supportingdocumentationand thestaffreportand otherinformation in the record for TentativeSubdivisionMap Application S- 7- 03 and Planned Development ApplicationPD- 5- 04 for the Shastina Ranch Subdivision project, andconsideredall testimonialand written evidencesubmitted priorto and duringthe pUblichearing; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS RESOLVEDby the City Council of the City of Retiringthat the followingfindingsare appropriate and proper to supportthe approval of Tentative
Subdivision Map Application S- 7- 03
and PlannedDevelopmentApplicationPD- 5- 04. CALIFORNIAENVIRONMENTALQUALITY ACT (CEQA) FINDINGS The project is within thescopeof the project definedin FinalEnvironmentalImpactReport EIR- 1- 03, certified by the Redding City Councilon April 5, 2005, by Resolution2005-

48. Changes or alternations have been required in or incorporated into the project which
avoid or substantiallylessen the significant environmentaleffectsidentified in Final EnvironmentalImpact Report EIR- 1- 03.

The City Council
adopts the Mitigation Monitoring
and Reporting Programincluded in Final EnvironmentalImpactReport iEIR- 1- 03. TENTATIVEMAP FINDINGSGovernment Code Section66474)To approvea tentative subdivisionmapapplication, the approvingbody must find thatnone of the circumstancesas
set forthin the GovernmentCode of the State of CalifomiaChapter66474.61( a) through g) exists, specifically:That the proposedmap is not consistent withapplicablegeneraland specific plans as specifiedin Section65451. Theprojectdensity falls withinthe rangeanticipatedby the property' s General Plan designationof " Residential, 2 to 3. 5 dwelling units per acre." The projectdesignfurthersGeneralPlanGoals CDD2, CDD3, CDD5, CDD9, CDD10, CDD11, CDD12, CDD16, CDD16; NR3, NR5 through NR10; T3,
T5, T6, T8, T9; HS2; R4, R5, R10, R11; PF1, PF2, PF15 as follows:ShastinaRanch, $-7- 03 and PD- 5- 04 The project will providean aesthetic master plannedcommunityof five " villages" distinguished by lot and home size, but also sharing certain common neighborhoodsite and architecturaldesign elements and a neighborhoodpark, fosteringneighborhoodcohesiveness.

Features
include qualityarchitecture, projectentrance

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 240
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) bo
Co
ho
The project provides a range of lot sizes and well- designedhousing products, including neighborhoodunits with homes specificallydesignedfor smalllots, fostering efficientuseof land. GeneralPlan Goals CDD10,
CDD11)The developmentwill preserve approximately61 acres, or 27 percent, of the total projectland areain publicand private open. space. This land encompassesareasfor active recreation (public park), passive recreation (public trail), preservationof sensitive habitat (vernal pools), and public protection ( floodplain). (GeneralPlan Goals CDD3, CDD5, CDD10, NR3, NR5 through NR10,HS2,
R2) Immediate recreation opportunitieswill be providedto residentsthrough dedicationof land and constructionof a public neighborhoodpark and publictrail systemin conjunctionwith subdivision development. (GeneralPlan GoalsT8, R4, R5, R10, R11, PF15) The project design transfers residentialdensityrights withinthe project boundariesto avoid sensitive wetland habitat ( approximately24 acres). ( GeneralPlan Goals NR3, NR5 through
NRIO)The subdivisiondesign promotes pedesthanismthrough: ( GeneralPlan Goals CDD10, CDD 16, CDD17, T5, T6,
T8) Provisionof a ten- foot- wide pedestrian/ bicycle
path within 35- foot- wide
landscapedparkways alongShasta View Drive. ii. Provision of sidewalksseparatedfrom the vehiclelanes by a
landscapedparkway alongall internal streets. iii. Provision of landscapedsidewalk connections between
internal streets andShasta View Drive.iv. Provisionof connectionsbetweenthe internalstreet systemand the open- spacetrail system.The project will enhancethe aestheticsof the public- street system by incorporationof a landscapedtrafficCircle, landscapemedian, and widenedlandscapedparkwaysin Shasta '
View Drive. General Plan Goals CDD16, CDD17, T3) Subdivisionimprovementspromotethe use of public transit through incorporationof bus stop improvementson Shasta. View Drive and pedestrianconnectionsbetweeninternal streets and Shasta View Drive. ( GeneralPlan GoalsCDD10, T3, T9) The subdivision is located in proximity to existing employment centers along Airport Road and the future StillwaterBusiness Park. (GeneralPlan Goal CDD10) The subdivisionis in an area of invested and planned public infrastructure. The site is within the Clover CreekSewer TrunkLine Assessment District, in which the propertyis invested. The projectwillresult in the dedicationof landfor a public well site and constructionof a 24- inch water mainbetweenRanchoRoadand Airport Road as specifiedby the City's
Master Water Plan. GeneralPlan GoalsCDD2, PF1)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 241
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) That the [ tesign or improvement of the proposed subdivision is not consistent with applicable general and specificplans. The project's street and lot designconform to the standards of the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. All utility and service infrastructures are immediately available to the site.

That the site is not physically :~uitable for the type of development. The property will accommodate creation of the proposed lots and residential structures without the need for any unusual grading or construction practices.

That the site is not physically suitable for the proposed density of development. The site is readily accessible by a planned street network and serviceable by City utility infrastructure. The terrain is level and does not contain any geologic hazards. Areas of steep slope and floodplain are being avoided and placed in open space. Areas of jurisdictional waters are being avoided to the extent practicable. The project density is at the low end of the density range allowed by the General Plan. Adequate street- and utility- service capacityis availableto accommodatethe
project. o That the designof the subdivisionor the proposed improvementsis likely to cause substantial environmentaldamageor substantiallyand avoidablyinjurefish or wildlifeor their habitat.

An environmentalimpact report, EIR- 1- 03, has beenprepared for the project. The EIR identifiesfeasiblemitigationsthatwill reduce all potentialeffects on the environment, including fish and wildlifehabitat to a level of
less than significant.Thatthe design of the subdivisionor typeof improvementsis likely to cause serious publichealth problems. The project does not: present anyadverseimpacts to publichealth subject to compliance with all recommended
conditionsof approval.Thatthe design of the subdivisionor the type of improvementswill conflict with easements' acquiredby the publicat large for access through, or use of property within the proposed subdivision. In this connection, the governing bodymay approvea map if it finds that alternate easementsfor access or for use will be providedand thatthese will be substantiallyequivalent to onespreviously acquiredby the public. This subsectionshallapply onlyto easementsof record or to easements establishedby judgment of a court of competentjurisdiction, andno authorityis herebygranted to a legislative body to determinethat the publicat large has acquired easementsfor access throughor use of property within the proposedsubdivision. There are no public-access easements through the property.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENTPLAN FINDINGSReddingZoningOrdinance
Chapter18. 53. 060) To approvean application for a PlannedDevelopmentPlan, Chapter18. 53. 060 of the ReddingMunicipalCode stipulatesthat the approvingbody must makethe following findings:Theproposed developmentis c. onsistent with the goals, objectives, policies, standards, and programsof this code and of the General Plan and any applicablespecificplan, including densityand intensitylimitationsthat apply. The projectdensity falls withinthe rangeanticipatedby the property' s General Plandesignationof "Residential, 2 to 3. 5 dwellingunits per acre." The project design furthers General Plan Goals CDD2, CDD3, CDD5, CDD9, CDD10, CDD11, CDD12, CDD16, CDD16; NR3, NR5throughNR10; T3, T5, T6, T8, T9; HS2; R4, R5, R10, R11; PF1, PF2, PF15, as further describedunder the
Tentative Map Findings above:Shastina Ranch, S-7- 03

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 242
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) The site for the proposed developmentis adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use and all yards, open spaces, setbacks, walls and fences, parking area, loading areas, landscape, and other features required. The project design satisfies all site standards and residential feature requirementsof the City Zoning Ordinance within the guidelines and purpose of the " PD" District. o The site for the proposed developmenthas adequateaccess considering the limitations of existing and planned streets and highways. The project includes and access will be provided by an extension of Shasta View Drive between Rancho Road and Airport Road. This street link has been identified on the City's General Plan as a future necessary street link since 1985.

Adequatepublic services exist or will be provided in accordance with the conditions of development plan approval, to serve the proposed development; and the approval of the proposed developmentwill not result in a reduction of such public services to properties so as to be a detriment to public health, safety, or welfare. Adequate public- serviceand utility capacityis availableto accommodatethe project without adverselyaffecting overall service
levels.The proposed development, as conditioned, will not havea substantial adverseeffect on surroundingpropertyor the permitteduse thereofand will be compatiblewith the existingand plannedland use characterof the surrounding area. The projectsiteis surroundedby other developedand ' undeveloped residential neighborhoodsand properties. The projectis consistentwith applicablenoise and safety policiesof the Redding MunicipalAirport ComprehensiveLand Use Plan ( CLUP).The improvementsrequiredand the mannerof developmentadequately addressall natural and manmade hazards associatedwith the proposed developmentand the projectsite, including, but not limitedto, flood, fire, and slope, hazards. The project completelyavoids developmenton steep slopesand withinthe Clover Creek floodplain, which are to be placedin open space. The project conditionsof approvalapply accessand GeneralPlan fire-
safetyguidelines.The proposed developmentcarriesout theintentof the Planned Developmentprovisions by providing a more efficientuse of the land and anexcellence of architectureand site designgreaterthan that whichcould be achievedthrough theapplicationof the base districtregulations. The projectprovides a more efficientuse of land throughprovisionof a rangeof lot sizes, minordeviationsto lot width, area, and setbackstandardsto allow for greater streetscapeenhancementsandprovisionof open space and model homesdesignedto fit small lots, while maintaining quality architecturalfeatures.BE IT FURTHERRESOLVED, the CityCouncilof theCity of Reddingherebyfinds and declares that the above Findingsare in evidence and approves TentativeSubdivisionMaP S- 7- 03 subject to the conditions of approvaland
PlannedDevelopmentPlan PD- 5- 04. BE IT FURTHERRESOLVED, by the City Councilof the City of Reddingthat this resolutionshall not have the force and effect of law and shall not become effective unlessand until OrdinanceNo. approving the DevelopmentAgreementby and between the City of Reddingand ShastaRanCh DevelopmentCompany, Inc., shall be introduced, adopted, andthereafterbecomes legally effectivepursuantto the
terms provided for in that ordinance.ShastinaRanch, S-

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 243
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced, read, and adoptedat a regular meeting of the City Council on the __ day of ., 2005, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

Attest:

JOHN R. MATHENA, Mayor
Form Approved:

CONNIE STROHMAYER, City Clerk
6-
17- 05RESO\ CC\
S703- PD504-ShastinaRanch- DD. wpd
RICHARD A. DUVERNAY, City AttorneyShastina Ranch, S-7- 03 APPROVEDPacket Pg. 244
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) ORDINANCE NO.

AN UNCODIFIED ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING

THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF

REDDING AND SHASTINA RANCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

RELATIVE TO THE DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS THE SHASTINA

RANCH SUBDIVISION
The City Council of the City of iRedding does ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Government Code section 65867.5(a) states that a " development agreement is a legislative act that shall be approved by ordinance and is subject to referendum." SECTION 2. Government Code Section 65867.5(b) states that a "development agreement shall not be approvedunless the legislative body finds that the provisions of the agreement are consistent with the general plan and any applicable specific plan."
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby approves the development agreement in the form marked as Attachment " A" to this ordinance, titled Shastina Ranch Development Agreement and on file with the City Clerk subject to such minor and clarifying changesconsistent with the terms thereof as may be approved by the City Attorney prior to execution thereof (" Development Agreement").

SECTION 4. The City Council adoptsthe following findings in conjunction with its approval of the Development Agreement:
a) Public hearings haw~ been held by the Planning Commission and the City Council as required by California Government Code Section 65867 et seq. and Redding Municipal Code Section 18. 20.030.
b) Notice of the public ihearingsin the form of a notice of intention to consider approval of a development agreement has been given in compliance with State law, California Government Code Section 65867 and Redding Municipal Code Section 18. 20.030. c) The Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the City's General Plan and all applicable specific plans. d) The Development Agreement is in the best interest of the City. e) The Development Agreement promotes the public interest and welfare of the City. f) The Development Agreement is consistent with and conforms to the requirements of California Government Code Sections 65864- 65869.

5. g) The DevelopmentAgreementis withinthe scopeof the project definedin EnvironmentalImpact Report
EIR-
1- 03. ATTACHMENTShastina RanchDevelopmentAgreementPage

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 245
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) SECTION 5. The Mayor is authorized and directed to execute the Development Agreement on behalf of the City of Redding.

SECTION 6. This ordinance was introduced and the title thereof read at the specialmeeting of the City Council on , 2005.

This ordinance shall not take effect until such time that the City Attorney certifies to the City Clerk that: ( 1) City of Redding Resolution No. 2005-__, pertaining to General Plan Amendment GPA- 4- 03, became legallyeffectiveand (2) a minimumof 30 days has passed sinceadoption of
theordinance. I HEREBYCERTIFYthat the foregoingordinance was introducedandreadat a regularmeetingof the CityCouncilof theCity of Redding on the__ day of ., 2005, and was duly read andadoptedat a regularmeetingof the City Council on the __ day of ., 2005, by the
following
vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT: ABSTAIN:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMBERS:

COUNCIL MEMiBERS:

COUNCIL
MEMiBERS:Attest:JOHN R.

MATHENA, Mayor
Form Approved: CONNIESTROHMAYER, City ClerkRICHARD A. DUVERNAY, City
Attorney 6-6- 05
PROJ\ ORD\ DevAgr- ShastinaRanch- DD. wpdShastinaRanch

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 246
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

RECORDING REQUESTED BY

CITY OF REDDING
Exempt fi. om Recording Fees
Pursuant to Government Code
Section 27383 -
Benefits
City) AND
WHEN RECORDEDMAIL TO: CITY

CLERK CITY
OF REDDING777

CYPRESSAVENUE REDDING,
CALIFORNIA96001 SPACE

ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE DEVELOPMENT

AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEENTHE CITY
OF REDDINGAND Shastina
Ranch DevelopmentCompany Inc. RELATIVE
TO THE DEVELOPMENTKNOWN AS Shastina
Ranch TentativeSubdivision Map S- 7- 03 and Planned Development PD- 5- 04 THISDEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT (the " Agreement") is enteredinto this __ day of 2005 ( the " Effi~ctive Date"), by and between Shastina RanchDevelopmentCompany Inc., a CaliforniaCorporation ("Developer"), andthe Cityof Redding, a municipal corporation, ("City"), pursuant: to the authority of Sections65864 through65869. 5 of the GovernmentCode of the
State
of California.RECITALS: A. To strengthenthe public planningprocess, encourage private participationin comprehensiveplanningand reducetheeconomic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of CaliforniaadoptedSection65; 864et seq. of the CaliforniaGovernment Code ( the "
DevelopmentAgreementStatute"). B. The Development AgreementStatuteauthorizesthe City to enter into a propertydevelopmentagreementwith anypersonhavinga legal or equitableinterest in real property for the developmentof suchreal propertyin order to establishcertaindevelopmentrights in
the real property. C. This Agreementis voluntarilyentered intoin considerationof the benefitsto and the rightsand obligationsof the parties on the basis of the facts cited herein, understanding and intentionsof the parties and in reliance upon the various representationsand warranties containedherein. Shastina
Ranch Development .
4greementATTAllHMENT"A"
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 247
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) D. Developer is a Corporation organized under the laws of the State of California and is in good standing thereunder.

E. Developer Owns in fee that certain parcel(s) of land ( the " Project Site")as more specifically described in Exhibits " B" and " C" attached hereto.

F. Developer intends to develop the Project Site as Tentative Subdivision Map S- 7- 03 and Planned DevelopmentPD- 5- 04, Shastina
RanchSubdivision/ Planned Development, creating446 single-family residential homes. The project also includes General Plan Amendment
GPA- 4- 03 and RezoningRZ- 8- 03 ( the "Project").G. TheProjectSite is located in the Cityand
consistsof a total of approximately224 acres of land. H. The ProjectSite is generally located one-half mile
south of RanchoRoad, lying on both sides of Clover Creek. I. The Projectwould result in General Plan landusedesignationson which the Projectis located of" Residential, 2 to

3. 5 dwellingunits per acre"; "GeneralIndustry"; and " Greenway" and zoning districts of " RS- 3- PD'" ResidentialSingle Family District with Planned DevelopmentOverlay District, "OS" Open Space District, and " GI" GeneralIndustry District. These GeneralPlan and Zoning land useclassificationsprovide for the single-familyresidential homesand accessoryuses thereto proposedby the Project. The
Projectdoes not includea proposalfor developmentof the lands classified "GeneralIndustry." J. Developer seeks to complywith conditionsof approvaland developtheSubjectPropertyin accordancewith the land use policies and goals set forth in
the City' s General Plan andwith the terms and conditionsof this Agreement.

K. Developerpresently contemplates not to apply for density increasesfor the Project, and the Citypresentlycontemplates not to revisethe maximumdensityand dwellingunit totals establishedby the DevelopmentPlan for the Projectfor the term
of this Agreement, thus ensuring thatappropriatefacilities and services areplannedand implemented.

L. Pursuantto Section65865of the Development Agreement Statute, a City may establishproceduresand requirementstbr the considerationof developmentagreements. The City, by adopting ReddingMunicipal Code Chapter18. 20, et seq. (City EnactingOrdinance) adoptedsuch procedures and requirements,
and the parties heretodesireto enter into sucha developmentagreementpursuantthereto.M. The Applicationfor thisAgreement was consideredby the City at ( a) duly noticed public heating( s) in accordance with the DevelopmentAgreement

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 248
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) N. For the reasons recited herein, the City has determined that the Project is a development for which this Agreement is appropriate under the Development Agreement Statute and City Enacting Ordinance.

O. This Agreement will eliminate uncertainty in planning for and securing orderly development of the Project Site, assure progressiveinstallation of necessary improvements, provide public services appropriateto each stage of developmentof the Project Site, ensure attainment of the maximum effective utilization of resources within the City at the least economic cost to its citizens, and otherwise achieve the goals', and purposes for which the Development Agreement Statue was enacted.

P. In exchange for the benefits to the City, contained herein, the City has taken or will take all actions required so that Developer may begin and consummate development of the Project, including the approval, adoption or issuance of necessary development permits, and the future ministerial approval of building plans and ministerial issuance of final maps, appropriate building permits, lot line adjustments, and other necessary or desired approvals and entitlements which are consistent with the development of the Project (collectively, the " Ministerial Approvals").

Q. In exchangefor the benefits to City, Developer desires to receive the assurance that it may proceed with the Project in accordance with the existing land use ordinances, subject to the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement and to secure the benefits afforded Developer by Government Code Section 65865.3.

R. It is the intent of the parties that all acts referred to in this Agreement shall be accomplished in such a way as ' to fully comply with CEQA, the Development Agreement Statute, the City Enacting Ordinance and the New Development Permits.

S. The terms of this Agreement support the vital and best interests of the City by ensuring the development of the Project which will support the planned development of the City in an efficient and logical manner.

T. The City has an expressedinterest in ensuringthe provisions of regional and community level infrastructure and in pursuing the use of developmentagreements as a method whereby a level of assurance can be achieved concerning the service demands within planned communities so that long- rangeplansfor needed infi' astrucmrecanbe developedand implemented.U. This Agreementis re. adc and enteredintoin considerationof the mutual covenants and in reliance upon the various representationsand warranties contained herein. The parties acknowledgethat, in relianceo: n the agreements, representationsand warranties contained herein, Developerwill take certain actions, includingmaking substantial investmentsand expenditures of monies, relativeto the ProjectSite and the development thereof. Shastina Ranch Development Agreement 3 June23, APPROVEDPacket Pg. 249
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority contained in the Development Agreement Legislation, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises of the parties herein contained, the parties agree as follows:

AGREEMENT:

SECTION 1. GENERAL ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.

The parties acknowledge that: ( a) the City, which has adopted a valid General Plan, has entered into this Agreement pursuant to the Development Agreement Legislation and its police power in order to address public health and safety and general welfare concerns including those relating to the amount, density, intensity and timing of developmentwithin the Subject Property and the need for public facilities and infrastructure in connection with the Subject Property and other property in the area; ( b) there is a certain authority under the police power to address public health and safety concerns that cannot be legally relinquished or restricted by this Agreement and that such authority intended to be reserved and hereby is reserved to City hereunder, provided that to the extent possible it shall be construed as to provide Developer with the assurances intended by this Agreement; and ( c) nothing herein shall be construed to limit or restrict the exercise by the City of its power of eminent domain.

SECTION 2. DEFINITIONS.

Reference in this Agreement to any of the following terms shall have the meaning set forth below for each such term.

2. 01 Approvals. Any anti all permits or approvals ofanykind or character required under the terms of this Agreement to dew,lop the Subject Property in the manner as described herein.

2. 02 Building Ordinances. Those building standards, of generalapplication and not imposed solely with respect to the Subject Property, in effect from time to time that govern building and construction standards, including, without limitation, the City's building, plumbing, electrical, mechanical, grading, swimming, pool, sign, and fire codes.

2. 03 CEQA. CEQA means the California Environmental Quality Act, California Public Resources Code section 21000, et seq., and the State CEQA Guidelines, ( California Code of Regulations, title 14, section 15; 000, et seq.), as each is amended from time to time.

2. 04 City. City of Redding, State of California.

2. 05 Development. The subdivision or improvement of the SubjectProperty for purposes of constructing the structures, improvements and facilities comprising the Project including, without limitation: grading, the construction and installation of infrastructure and public facilities related to the Project whether located within or outside the Subject Property; the construction of structures and Shastina Ranch Development Agreement 4 June 23, 2005
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 250
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) building; and the installation of landscaping; but not including the maintenance, repair, reconstruction or redevelopmentof any structures, improvements or facilities after the construction and completion thereof.

2. 06 Development Agreement Legislation. Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code as it exists on the Effective Date.

2. 07 Development Approval(s). Site- specific permitsand other entitlementsto useof every kind and nature approvedor gra~ntedby the Cityin connectionwith the Developmentincluding, but not limitedto: subdivisionapprovals (including tentativemaps, vesting tentativemaps, final maps, parcel mapsand map waivers), developmentpermits, conditionaluse permits, variances, oak tree permits, grading permits, building permitsand occupancy permits.2. 08 DevelopmentFees. All City adoptedfees and monetary exactionsthat are designed to pay for new or expandedpublic facilities neededto serve, or to mitigatethe adverse effectsof, a given developmentprojectand that are imposedby the City as a conditionof approval of discretionaryor ministerialpermitsfor, or in connectionwith the implementationof, that developmentproject. The term " DevelopmentFees" does not include processingfees and chargesas describedin this Agreement. The term " DevelopmentFees" also does not include requirementsthat developmentbe servedby a public utility evenif that public utility imposesa capital improvementfee or similar chargeas a conditionof providing service. All developmentfees shallbe depositedin a separatecapital facilities accountor fundin a mannerto avoidany comminglingof the fees with other revenuesand fundsof the local agency, and expend those fees solelyfor the purposefor whichthe fee was collected, pursuantto California GovernmentCode Section 66006.2. 09 Director. DevelopmentServices DepartmentDirectorof the Cityof Redding.2. 10 Enacting Ordinance. Ordinance
No. __2005, approvingthis
Agreement.enactedby the City Council
on2. 11 Exactions. All exactions, in- lieu fees or payments, dedication or reservation requirements, obligationsfor on- site or off- siteimprovements, construction requirements fi) r public improvements, facilities, or servicescalledin connectionwith the developmentof or constructionon the Subject Property, whether such requirements constitute subdivisionimprovements, mitigationmeasures in connectionwith environmentalreviewof any project, or impositionsmade underanyapplicableordinanceor in order to make a projectapprovalconsistentwith the land usepoliciesof the
City's General Plan. 2. 12 ExistingLand Use ' Ordinances. TheLand Use Ordinancesin effect as of the Effective
Dateof this Agreement.2. 13 GeneralPlan. The City of ReddingGeneralPlanas duly adopted by the City Council. Shastina Ranch DevelopmentAgreement APPROVEDPacket Pg. 251
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

2. 14 Land Use Ordinances. The ordinances, resolutions, codes, rules, regulationsand official policies of City, governing the developmentof the SubjectProperty, including but not limited to, the permitted uses of land, the density and intensity of use of land, exactions, and the timing of development, all as applicable to the developmentof the SubjectProperty. Specifically, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Land Use Ordinances shall include the City's General Plan, the Development Plan, the City'.,; Zoning Code and the City's Subdivision Code. The term Land Use Ordinances does not include Regulations relating to the following: the conduct of business, professions and occupations generally; taxes and assessments; the control and abatement of nuisances; encroachment and other permits and the conveyances of rights and interests that provide for the use of or entry upon public property; and any exercise of fhe power of eminent domain.

2. 15 Persons. As used herein, any reference to or use of the word " person" shall mean, in addition to a natural person, any governmentalentity and any partnership, corporation, joint venture or any other form of business entity.

2. 16 Project. The Shastina Ranch Subdivision and Planned Development as described bythe City Council approvaland accompanyingexhibits of Tentative Subdivision Map Application S- 7- 03 and PlannedDevelopmentPlan PD- 5- 04, associatedamenities, and on- siteand off- site improvements, contemplatedby or embodiedwithin the approval of S- 7- 03 and PD- 5- 04, as the samemay hereafter be further refined,
enhanced, or modified pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.2. 17 Regulations. Constitutions, statutes, City ordinances,
andcodes, City resolutions and officialpolicies of theCity. 2. 18 Subject Property. Thatreal propertydescribedin
Exhibit "C" attached hereto a~ nd made a part hereof.2. 19 CertainOther Terms. Certain other termsshall have
the meaningsset forth
forsuchterms in this Agreement.SECTION 3. GENERALPROVISIONS.3. 01 Property Description.

The legal descriptionof the Subject Propertyis specificallyset forth on Exhibit "B" attachedhereto and made a part hereof. 3. 02 Locationof Subject Property. The SubjectProperty, consisting of a total of approximately230 acres, is located approximatelyone-half mile south of Rancho Road, lying on both sides of Clover Creek, and is identifiedas Assessor's
ParcelNumbers054- 170- 002, 054- 170- 003, and 054- 510-02 in the Cityof Redding.3. 03 EffectiveDate. This Agreementhasbeen enteredintoby the parties as of the date and year first above-written, and shall be effectiveas of such date ("EffectiveDate"); provided, however, that ifa referendum election is duly APPROVEDPacket Pg. 252
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) is disapproved, this Agreement shall be null and void as of the date of the final declaration by the City Council of the disapproval by the referendum election of the Enacting Ordinance.

3. 04 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence upon the Effective Date and shall extend six years thereafter, unless said term is otherwise terminated, modified or extended by circumstances set forth in this Agreement or by mutual consent of the parties. Subject to the approval of the City Council, the term of this Agreement may be extended in one- year incrementsup to the build-out of the Projectto a total Agreementperiodoften ( 10) years. Extensions of the term of this Agreementbeyondthe sixth yearmay be grantedupon the mutualagreementof the City and the Developerand subjectto the writtenrequest of either party. This Agreement may be amended by mutualconsentof the City and the Developerto extend the term of the Agreementbeyond ten years to coincidewith the term of TentativeSubdivisionMap S- 7- 03, as determinedby Chapter17. 24 of the Redding MunicipalCode and/or Section66452. 6 of the StateSubdivisionMap Act. The City and the Developeragreethat theterm of this Agreement is necessaryin orderto permit the orderlyand
planneddevelopmentof the Project. 3. 05 Expiration of Term. Followingthe expiration of said term, this Agreementshallbe deemed terminatedand of no furtherforce and effect without theneed of furtheraction (i. e.,
documentation) of the partieshereto.3. 06 Time is of the essence. Timeis of the essenceof this Agreement and of each and
everytermand conditionhereof. 3. 07 Enforceabilityof Agreement. City and Developer agree that unlessthis Agreement is amendedor terminatedpursuantto the provisions of this Agreement, thisAgreementshall be enforceable by and party heretonotwithstandingany changehereafter in any applicablegeneral plan, specific plan, zoning ordinance, subdivisionordinance, the ExistingRules or any other land use ordinancesor buildingordinances, resolutions or ordinancesor other regulationsadopted by the City whichchanges, alters or amends, the Existing Rulesapplicableto the developmentof the ProjectSite at the time of the approval of this Agreementas provided by GovernmentCode Sections65866 and 65867.5. This Agreementshallnot prevent the Cityin subsequent actionspertainingto the ProjectSite from applyingnew rules, regulations, and policieswhich do not conflictwith those rules, regulations, and policies presentlyapplicableto the Project Site.

This Agreementalso shall not prevent City from denying or conditionally approving anysubsequentdevelopmentprojectapplicationby a third party not a successor-in- interest heretoon the basis of such
existingor new rules, regulationsand policies.3. 08 Further Assurances. Eachparty shallexecuteand deliver to the other all such otherfurther instruments anddocumentsas may be reasonably necessaryto carry out this Agreementin order to provideand secureto the otherpartythe full and complete
enjoyment of its rights and privilegeshereunder.Shastina APPROVEDPacket Pg. 253
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

3. 09 Singular and Plural; Gender. As used herein, and except where the context requires otherwise, the singular of any word includes the plural and vice versa, and pronouns inferring the masculine gender shall include the feminine genderand vice versa.

3. 10 Covenants Run With The Land. All of the terms, provisions, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties and their respectiveheirs, successors, and assigns, and all , other persons or entities acquiring all or any portion of the Subject Property, or any interest therein, whether by operation of law or in any manner whatsoever, and the rights thereof shall inure to the benefit of such parties and their respective heirs, successors and assigns.

3. 11 Enforcement of Covenants. All of the provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land pursuant to applicable law, including but not limited to, Section 1468 of the Civil Code of the State of California.

3. 12 Constructive Notice. Every person who now or hereafter owns or acquires any right, title or interest in or to any portion of the Project or the SubjectProperty is and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to every provision contained herein, whether or not any reference to this Agreement is contained in the instrument by which such person acquired an interest in the Project or the Subject Property.

SECTION 4. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY.

4. 01 Project. The Project is defined and described in the City Council approval of Tentative Subdivision Map Application S- 7- 03 and PlannedDevelopmentPlan PD- 5- 04, Shastina Ranch Subdivision/PlannedDevelopment, which specifiesall the followingaspects of the Project:i) proposed usesof the SubjectProperty, ( ii) provision of public servicesand infrastructuresupportingdevelopmentof the Project, (iii) densityand intensity of use of the property, (iv) provisionof Projectdesignfeatures and amenities , and ( v) requirementsfor reservationor dedicationof portionsof the SuhjectPropertyfor public purposes.4. 02 GeneralDevelopment. Any developmentof the Projecton the ProjectSite shall be conductedin accordance withthe terms andconditionsof this Agreement.4. 03 PermittedUses. The permittedusesof the Project Site, the densityand intensityof use, themaximumheight and size of proposedbuildings, provisionsfor reservationor dedication of land for public purposes and location of public improvements, and other terms and conditionsof developmentapplicableto the ProjectSite shallbe those set forth in the approvedTentative Subdivision Map S- 7- 03 and Planned DevelopmentPlanPD- 5-
04, Shastina RanchSubdivision/PlannedDevelopment, subject to the following: 1) Conditions of Approvalfor approved TentativeSubdivision Map S- 7-
03 and Planned Development Plan PD- 5- 04,
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 254
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) 2) Mitigation Requirements as set forth in Environmental Impact Report EIR- 1- 03 for TentativeSubdivision map Application S- 7-
03, ShastinaRanchSubdivision.3) As set forth in this Agreementor as otherwise set forth in applicablelaws,
ordinances,rulesor regulations. 4. 04 Future Approvals. The City hereby agreesthat landuses set forth in the New DevelopmentPermitsare approved or will be approvedpursuantto the terms of this Agreement, provided that Developersatisfactorilycomplies with all preliminaryprocedures, actions, paymentsandcriteriaapplicable as of the effective date of this Agreementand generallyrequiredof developersby the City for processingapplicationsfor developmentsat suchtime. City agrees to grant and implementthe necessaryland use, zoning, site plan or subdivisionapprovals and to grant other approvalsand permits, includingthe Ministerial Approvals, that will accomplishor facilitatedevelopmentof the Project Site for the uses and to thedensity or intensityof developmentdescribedand shown in the New DevelopmentPermits and/or this Agreementpursuantto those rules,regulationpoliciesand conditions in forceon the effectivedate of this Agreement. 4. 05 Applicable Rules, Regulationsand Official Policies.

Exceptas otherwiseprovidedin this Agreement, the rules, regulations, official policies, and conditions of approvalgoverningthe permitteduses of the Project Site, the densityor intensityof use, and the design, improvement,construction, building and occupancystandardsand specificationsapplicable to the Projectandthe ProjectSite shall be those in force on the effective date this Agreement ("Existing Rules"). The City shall have the rightto impose reasonableconditions in connectionwith such subsequentdiscretionarypermit actions which are not deemed Ministerial Approvals, but such conditionsand actionsshall not preventdevelopment of the Project as contemplated by this Agreementand the DevelopmentPermits, or place burdensomeor restrictive measures on Developer in connectionwith
thedevelopmentof the Project. 4. 06 Amendmentto ApplicableOrdinances. In the eventthe CityZoningCodeis amendedby the City in a mannerwhich ,. provides more favorablesite developmentstandardsthanthosein effect as of the EffectiveDate, Developershall havetheright to notifyCity in writingof its desireto be subjectto the new standardsfor the remainingterm of this Agreement. If City agrees, by resolutionof the CityCouncilor by action of a City officialwhom the City Council may designate, such newstandardsshall become applicableto the Subject property. Should City thereafteramendsuch new standards, upon the effectivedate of such amendment, the originalnew standards shallhaveno further applicationto t] he SubjectProperty, but Developermay notify Cityand Citymay agree by resolution to applysuchamended newstandardsto theProperty.4. 07 Applicationof New Rules, Regulationsand Policies.

This Agreementshall not prevent Cityin subsequentactions applicableto the SubjectProperty from applyingnew rules, regulationsand policieswhich do not conflictwith those rules, regulations, and policies applicableto the Subject Propertyand set forth herein; nor shall this Agreementprevent City from denying or conditionallyapproving any subsequentdevelopmentprojectapplicationon the basis of such existingor
new rules, regulations, and policies. ShastinaRanchDevelopment APPROVEDPacket Pg. 255
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

4. 09 Approval of Subsequent Tentative and Final Maps. Although the Existing Land Use Ordinances shall determine the standards for granting or withholding approval of Tentative, Vesting Tentative and Final Tract Maps and Vesting Tentative and Tentative Final Parcel Maps, the procedures for processing approval of all such Maps shall be governed by such ordinances and regulations as may then be applicable.

4. 10 Changes in State and Federal Rules and Regulations. Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the application to the development of the Subject Property of changes in the City's laws, regulations, plans or policies, the terms of which are specifically mandated and required by changes in state or federal laws or regulations as provided in Government Code Section 65869.5.

4. 11 Processing Fees. This Agreement shall not be construed to limit the authority of the City to charge processing fees for l[ and use approvals, building permits or other similar permits or entitlements which are in force and effect on a citywide basis at the time application is made for such permits or entitlements.

4. 12 Development Fees. This Agreement shall not be construed to limit the authority of the City to charge development impact fees in effect at the time of application for land use approvals, building permits, or other similar permits or entitlements which are in force and effect on a citywide basis at the time application is made for such permits or entitlements.

SECTION 5. PERIODIC REVIEW.

City shall conduct a review of this Agreement as set forth in the following subsections.

5. 01 Annual Review. City shall review the extent of good faith compliance by Developer with the terms of this Agreement at least once every 12- month period fromthe EffectiveDateof this
Agreement.5. 02 Procedure. Such manual review shallbe conductedin accordancewith theCity's duly adopted DevelopmentAgreement
Procedures.5.03 Notice. City shall notify Developerin writingof the dateof reviewat least thirty ( 30) days prior
thereto.5. 04 Good- Faith Compliance. During each annual review, Developeris required to demonstrategood faith compliancewith the termsof thisAgreement.5. 05 Production of Documentsand Other Evidence. Developeragrees to furnish such reasonableevidence and adequatedocumentationof good faith complianceas the City, in the exerciseof its reasonablediscretion,
mayrequire.5. 06 Cost of AnnualReview. The costsincurredby City in connectionwith the annual reviewshall be borne
by Developer.Shastina Ranch Development Agreement10 June APPROVEDPacket Pg. 256
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) SECTION 6. OBLIGATIONS OF AND CONTRIBUTIONS BY DEVELOPER.

6. 01 Contributions. In consideration of City entering into this Agreement, Developer has agreedto comply with the applicableprovisions of approvedTentative Subdivision Map S- 7- 03 and PlannedDevelopmentPlan PD- 5- 04, Shastina
Ranch SubdivisionfPlannedDevelopment, in developingthe Project and to perform certain obligations and provide certain contributionsset forth therein, which City acknowledgeswill haVean overall benefitto the public and surroundingarea, including
but not limited to: 1) Complywith all conditions of approvalof Tentative SubdivisionMap S- 7- 03 and Planned DevelopmentPD-
5- 04, ShastinaRanch Subdivision/PlannedDevelopment ( Exhibit "D"). 2) Prior to issuance of an entitlement for furtherdivision, development, or use of the industrialParcel "A," as identifiedby the approved tentative map of the Shastina RanchSubdivision,the applicant, owner, or successor in interest shall, in consultationwith the City, preparea projectstudy report to determine preliminaryconstructiondesignand the appropriateShastina Ranch project shareof the cost of the followingimprovements:Determinationof an alignment andwidening to a four- lane arterial standardthe section of Chum Creek RoadbetweenSouth BonnyviewRoad and Rancho
Road, includingreconstructionof theChum Creek bridgeas necessary.

Realignment/reconstructionof the intersectionsof Victor Avenue and RanchoRoad with Chum CreekRoadto provideadequatetrafficcontrol andturn lanes. Placementof a traffic signal at the intersectionof RanchoRoad andAlta Mesa Drive.The Shastina Ranch pro rata shareshall be paid, or a funding mechanismapproved by the City, prior to issuance of an
entitlementfor furtherdivision, development, or use of industrial Parcel "A." 3) Dedicateland, design, engineer, obtain permits, and constructa publicpark. 4) Dedicateland, design, engineer, obtain permits, and construct a publictrail system within the Clover Creek open space, encompassedby the Shastina Ranchprojectand City- owned land adjacentto the north Trail improvementson the City property
shall include a drinkingfountain,benches, picnic tables, trash receptacles, and signage.5) Public park and trail improvementsshall be constructedand maintained in substantial conformancewith the exhibitsand
schedule containedin Exhibit " A." 6) Dedicateland
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 257
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

6. 02 Nexus/ Reasonable iRelationship Challenges. The Developer consentsto, and waivesany rightsit may have now or in the futureto challengethc legal validityof, the conditions, requirements, policiesor programsrequiredby the ExistingLand Use Regulationsor this Agreement including, without limitation, any claim that they constitutean abuseof thc police power, violate substantivedue process, deny equal protectionof the laws, effecta takingof property without paymentof just compensation,, or imposean unlawful tax. In the event any other party may challengethc legal validityof such conditions, requirements, policiesor programsrequiredby the ExistingLand Usc Regulationsand/ or this Agreement, Developerspecificallywaivesany right it mayhave to modificationof anytermsof this Agreementbasedon the resultsof any suchchallengeby any
otherparty.6. 03 Cooperation By Developer. Developerwill, in a timely manner, provideCity with all documents, applications, plans and other informationnecessaryfor City to carryout its obligationshereunder, and causeDeveloper's planners, engineers, and all otherconsultantsto submitin a timelymanner all requiredmaterials and
documentstherefore.6. 04 Other GovernmentalPermits. Developershallapplyfor andsecurein a timely mannersuch other permits and approvalsfrom othergovernmental or quasi- governmentalagencies havingjurisdictionover the SubjectProperty or any off- siteproperty as maybe requiredfor the developmentof, or provisionof
servicesto, the Project.6. 05 Reimbursementfor City' s Efforts on Behalfof Developer. To the extent thatCity, on behalfof Developer, attemptsto enter into binding agreementswith other entities in order to ensure the availabilityof certainpermits and approvalsor servicesnecessary for developmentof the Projectas described in this Agreement, DevelopershallreimburseCity for all costsand expensesincurredin connectionwith seekingand entering into any such agreement. Any fees, assessmentsor otheramounts payableby City pursuant to any such agreementdescribed hereinshall bc borne by Developerexcept whereDeveloperhas notifiedCityin writing, prior to City enteringintosuch agreement, that it does not desire for City to executesuchagreement.6. 06 City' s Efforts to Defend and/or Enforce Multi AgencyAgreements. Developershall defendCity in anychallengeby any personto any suchagreement, and shall reimburseCity for anycostsandexpenses incurredby City in enforcingany such agreement.

SECTION7. OBLIGATIONSOF CITY. In considerationof Developerenteringinto this Agreement, City has agreed to the following withrespectto the
developmentof the Project
Site: 7. 01 City Obligations. 1) Approve GeneralPlan Amendment Application
GPA- 4- 03 and Rezoning ApplicationRZ- 8-
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 258
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) 2) Credit the Developer for the costs associated with the designand construction of a public park through credits to the City in- lieu park fee and park developmentfee obligation. (No credit shallbe grantedfor environmentalanalysis, securingof permitsfrom any agencyother thanthe City, or for any portionof the Clover Creektrail located outsidethe park.) Fee credit shallbe processedin accordancewith Exhibit "A," Park Developmentand Park FacilitiesImpactFee Credit Agreement.3) Allow useof City- owned land identifiedas Assessor's Parcel No. 054- 510- 026 to satisfy the project' s requirementsfor constructingShastaView Drive and publictrail improvements.4) If deemedappropriateby the City' s DevelopmentServicesDirector, allow use of City-ownedland identifiedas Assessor' s ParcelNo. 054-510-026 for the end of a cul- de- sac street (Street P") to achieveefficientlot configuration and enhance public accessto the publictrail. 5) Allowuse of a portionof the public park forthe project's storm-waterdetentionrequirementsupon a demonstrationof conformanceto the designstandardscontainedin Exhibit " A" and as approved by
the City' DevelopmentServices Departmentand CommunityServices Department.6) Reimburse and/or creditthe Developer' s costs expendedin excess of the project' s calculated pro rata sharefor costs associatedwith off- site trafficcirculationimprovementsconstructedas a requirementof Projectdevelopmentunder any of the followingthree scenarios:The City' s Capital ImprovementPlanis amended to includesaid improvements, or any elementthereof, as beingfunded by the Citywide Transportation DevelopmentImpact Fee. Reimbursementshall be administeredin substantialconformancewith, and subject to, the provisionsof Section16. 20. 150, Credit
and Reimbursementfor Constructionof Facilities, of the ReddingMunicipal Code.

The City adopts, a " Reimbursement
Ordinance" underwhich the off-site traffic- circulation improvementswould be eligible.The City establis, hes a specificTraffic
BenefitZone under which the off- site traffic-circulationimprovementswould be eligible.7) Reimburse and/ or credit the Developer above the project's calculatedpro rata sharefor the costs associatedwith oversiizingwater and utilitylines to allow extensionof service to other propertiesand in accordancewith the CityMaster WaterPlan and MasterSewerPlan. Actuallaborcosts of
improvementsto be eligiblefor reimbursement/creditshall be as determinedby the City Engineer. 7. 02 Processing. Upon satisfactorycompletionby Developerof all required preliminaryactions andpayments of appropriateprocessingfees, if any, City shallpromptlycommence and diligentlyproceed to complete all requiredsteps
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 259
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) and the development by Devek)per of the Project Site in accordance with, but not limited to, the following:
1) The holding of all required public hearings; and
2) The processingand approvalof all Ministerial Approvals and related matters as necessary for the completion of the development of the Project. In this regard, Developer will, in a timely manner, provide City with all documents, applications, plans and other information necessary for City to carry out its obligations hereund, er as required by the Existing Rules and shall cause Developer's planners, engineersand all other consultants to submit in a timely manner all required materials and documents therefore as required by the Existing Rules.

7. 03 Standard of Review. The rules, regulations and policies that apply to any Ministerial Approvals which must be secured prior to the construction of any portion of the Project shall be the Existing Rules. Any Ministerial Approval, including without limitation a building permit, shall be approved by the City within a reasonable period of time after application is made therefore.

7. 04 Contract Services. If requestedby Developer, at Developer's expense, City shall obtain outside contractual services as necessary to ensure prompt processingof all developmentapprovals.

SECTION 8. AMENDMENTS.

8. 01 Amendment by Mutual Consent. This Agreement may be amended from time to time by mutual consent of the original parties or their successors in interest, with City's costs payableby amendment applicants, in accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 65867 and 65868 and provided that the amendment of this Agreement shall follow the City's adopted procedures and requirements for the consideration of development agreements.

8. 02 Amendment Exemptions. Any amendment of the City's land use regulations that, pursuant to this Agreement, is applicable to the property, including, but not limited to, an amendment to the General Plan and zoning ordinances, shall not require an amendment to this Agreement.

Instead, any such amendment shall be deemed to be incorporated into this Agreement at the time that such amendment is approved.

8. 03 Amendment of Development Permits. Upon the written request of Developer, the Shastina Ranch tentative map approval (S~ 7- 03) and Planned DevelopmentPlan ( PD- 5- 04) mayfrom timeto time be amendedor modified in the mannerset forth in this Agreement and applicableState
and City laws. SECTION9.

TRANSFERSANDASSIGNMENTS.9. 01 City' s Intent. Developerhas demonstrated, and the City finds that Developer possesses,the experience, reputation andfinancialresourcesto developand maintain the SubjectProperty in themannercontemplated by thisAgreement. It is because of such qualifications, which ensure the Shastina Ranch DevelopmentAgreement14
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 260
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) developmentof the Subject Property to a high quality standard contemplatedby the General Plan that the Cityis entering into this Agreement. Accordingly, restrictions on the right of Developer to assign or transfer the rights and privileges contained in this Agreement are necessary in order to ensure the achievement of the objectives of the City's General Plan and this Agreement.

9. 02 Developer's Right to Assign or Transfer. Developer may assignor transfer any of its rights or interests under this Agreement subject to consent of City.

9. 03 Restriction on Assignment Does Not Constitute an Unreasonable Restraint on Alienation. Developer agrees that the restriction on its right to transfer any of its rights or interests under this Agreement is not repugnant or unreasonable in that such a restriction is a material inducement to the City to enter into this Agreement since the restriction reserves for the City the power to prevent the transfer of any of the rights and obligations hereunder to an unreliable developer.

9. 04 Restriction on Assignment Shall Not Prevent Developer From Conveying the Subject Property. The parties agree that the restriction on assignment without consent is limited solely to those certain vested rights created under this Agreement and such restriction shall not affect Developer's right to convey the Subject Property itself.

9. 05 Request Procedure. City shall administer the provisions of this Section through its Development Services Department Director. Developer shall notify the Director and the City Manager in writing of its request for City's consent to an assignment or transfer under this Section, together with a statement that if the Director does not notify Developer within forty- five (45) daysof receiptof the request, the requestwill be deemed approved.9. 06 45- DayPeriod. If within such 45-day period the Directordoes not so notify Developer,the requestfor consentshall automaticallybe deemedapproved and no further actionby Developeror the City shallbe necessary. If within such45- day period the Director notifies Developerthat' the requestwill be consideredand acted upon by City, Developer shall furnishsuchadditional informationas the Directormay reasonablyrequestat the time of such notice, and City shall proceedto considerand act upon the Developer's request for City' s consent to the proposed assignmentor transfer. Failureby the City to . act withinthirty ( 30) days of givingsuch notice or of receiving the additional requestedinformationshall automaticallybe deemedan approvalof the request. 9. 07 City Council Approval. In the event the Director determines that the assignmentor transfershouldbe actedupon by the City Council, and the Director so notifiesDeveloperwithinfifteen (15) days of giving the notice or receivingthe informationdescribed herein, the mattershall be referred to the City Council. The City Councilshall have forty-five ( 45) days from the date of such noticeto approve or deny the requestedtransferor assignment. Failure of City to act within the forty- five (45) day period shallautomaticallybe deemedan approval of the request. 9. 08 Assignment. The managementcontroland responsibility of Developer and the expertise, competence, and financial strengthof Developer are integral componentsof the consideration for ShastinaRanch APPROVEDPacket Pg. 261
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) City entering into this Agreement. In order to preserve such consideration for City and for City to receive full value, the parties ihereto agree that the occurrence of any of the following events constitute, for purposes of this provision, an assignment:
1) A change in the composition of ownership interests in and control of Developer, the result of which diminishes Developer's ownership interest to less than twenty percent ( 20%). 2) A changein the composition of ownership interests in and control of the Subject Property such that Developer's equity in the Subject Property is reduced to less than fifty- one percent ( 51%).9. 09 Minor Assignments. The following transfersshallbe consideredminor assignunentswhich shall not be subjectto this Section:
none.9. 10 Noticeof Proposed , Assignment. Developermust provideCity with adequate evidencethat the proposed assignee, buyer or transfereeis qualifiedusingthe standardsand conditions describedin this Section, and abilityto complywith these standardsand conditionswill be the testof
reasonableness.9. 11 Conditionsand Standards. The conditionsand standards referredto above are as
follows:1) Such assigneeor transferee possessesthe experience, reputationand financial resourcesto causethe Subject Propertyto be developedand maintainedin the manner contemplatedby theCity's GeneralPlan and this
Agreement;2) Such assigneeor transferee enters intoa written assumption agreement, in form and content satisfactoryto the City Attorney, expressly assumingand agreeingto be boundby the provisionsof this
Agreement;3) Such assignmentor transferwill not impairthe abilityof Cityto achievethe objectivesof its generalPlan and this
Agreement;4) Good cause existsfor Developerto make such assignmentor transfer. For purposes of this subsection, good cause shall includebut is not limitedto such causesas business reorganizations, financing arrangementsfor the developmentof the Subject Property, and exigent circumstances.creatingthe needto generatecapitalto offset material business losses.9. 12 Financing Exemption. Mortgages, deedsof trust, salesand lease-backs, or otherforms of conveyancerequiredfor any reasonablemethod of financingrequiringa security arrangementwithrespectto the SubjectProperty are permittedwithout the consentof the City, provided the City receives priornotice of such fimmcing (including the name andaddressof the lenderand the person or entitiesacquiringany such securedinterest) and Developerretainsthe legal and equitable interest Shastina Ranch Development Agreement16 June APPROVEDPacket Pg. 262
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) in the Subject Property and remains fully responsiblehereunder. The words " mortgage" and " deed of trust," as used herein, include all other appropriate modes of financing real estate acquisition, construction and land development.

9. 13 Notice of Assignment. Upon receiving approval of an assignment, Developer shall provide City with written notice of such assignment and as part of such notice the assigneemust execute and deliver to City an assumption agreement in which the name and address of the assignee is set forth and the assigneeexpressly and unconditionally assumes the obligations of all the provisions set forth in the Agreement.

9. 14 Unapproved Assignments. If City reasonablymakes the determination not to consent to the assignment or transfer of the rights and privileges contained in this Agreement, and Developer conveys the Subject Property to a third party, in whole or in part, Developer shall remain liable and responsible for all of the duties and obligations of this Agreement.

9. 15 Notice of Sale of Subject Property. Developer shall give written notice to the city, within ten ( 10) days after close of escrow, of any sale or transfer of any portion of the Subject Property, specifying the name or names of the purchaser, the purchaser's mailing address, the amount and location of the land sold or transferred, and the name and address of a single person or entity to whom any notice relating to this Agreement shall be given.

SECTION 10. DELAY'S IN PERFORMANCE.

10. 01 Permitted Delays. In addition to any other provisions of this Agreement with respect to delay, Developer and City shall be excused for performanceof their obligations hereunder during any period of delay caused by acts of God or civil commotion, riots, strikes, picketing, or other labor disputes, shortageof materials or supplies, or damageto or prevention of work in process by reason of fire, floods, earthquake, or other casualties, litigation, acts or neglect of the other party, or restrictions imposed or mandated by governmental or quasi- governmentalentities, enactment of conflicting provisionsof the Constitutionor lawsof the United Statesof Americaor the State of Californiaor any codes, statutes, regulationsor executive mandates promulgated thereunder.10. 02 Third Party Actions. Any court actionor proceedingbroughtby any third partyto challengethis Agreement, or any other permitor approval requiredfrom City or any other governmentalentityfor developmentor constructionof all or any portionof the Project, whether or not Developeris a partyto or real partyin interestin such actionor proceeding, shall constitute a PermittedDelay underthis
Section.10. 03 Noticeof PermittedDelays. If written noticeof such delayis givento either party within (30) daysof the commencementof such delay, an extensionof time for such cause shall be grantedin writingfor the periodof the enforceddelay, or longeras maybe mutuallyagreed upon. ShastinaRanch Development Agreement 17 dune23,
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 263
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) SECTION 11. DEFAULT.

11. 01 Events of Default. Subject to any extensions of time by mutual consent in writing, and subject to the provisions of the Section regarding Permitted Delays, the failure or unreasonable delay by either party to perform any material term or provision of this Agreement for a period of thirty (30) days aRer the dispatch of a written notice of default from the other party shall constitute a default under this Agreement. If the nature of the alleged default is such that it cannot reasonably be cured within such 30- day period, the commencementof the cure within such time periodand the diligent prosecutionto completionof the cure shallbe deemeda cure within such period.11. 02 Noticeof Default. Any Noticeof Defaultgiven hereundershall specifyin detail the natureof the alleged Eventof Defaultand the mannerin which such Eventof Defaultmay be satisfactorily.curedin accordancewith the termsand conditionsof this Agreement.11. 03 Cure Period. Duringthe time periods herein specifiedfor cureof an Event of Default, the party charged therewithshall not be consideredto be in defaultfor purposes of terminationof this Agreement, institutionof legal proceedingswith respect thereto, or issuance of any buildingpermit with respectto the
Project.11. 04 General Default Remedies. After noticeand expirationof the 30- day period withoutcure, the non- defaultingparty shall have such rights and remedies againstthe defaultingparty as it may have at law or in equity, including, but not limitedto, the right to terminate thisAgreement pursuantto GoverrmaentCodeSection65868 or seek mandamus, specificperformance,injunctive
or declaratoryrelief. 11. 05 RemediesCumulative. Any rights or remedies available to non- defaulting party underthis Agreementand any other rights or remediesthat suchparty may haveat law or in equityupona defaultby the other party underthis Agreementshall be distinct, separateand cumulative rightsand remedies availableto such non-defaultingparty and none of suchrights or remedies,whetheror not exercisedby the non-defaulting party, shall be deemed to exclude any otherrights or remediesavailable to the non-defaultingparty.

The non- defaultingpartymay, in its discretion,exercise anyand all of its rightsand remedies, at once or in succession, at such time
or times as the non- defaultingparty considersappropriate.11. 06 Legal Action. Eitherparty may, in addition to any other rightsor remedies, institute legal actionto cure, correct or remedy a default, enforceany covenant or agreementherein, enjoinany threatened or attempted violation hereof, or enforceby specific
performancethe obligationsand rights of the partieshereto. 11. 07 No DamagesRelief AgainstCity. The partiesacknowledgethat Citywould not haveentered into this Agreementhad it been exposed to damageclaimsfrom Developerfor anybreachthereof. As such, the parties agreethat in no eventshallDeveloperbe entitledto
recover damagesagainst City for breach of this
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 264
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

11. 08 Developer Default. No building permit shall be issued or building permit application acceptedfor any structure on the SubjectProperty after Developer is determined by City, to be in default of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and until such default thereafter is cured by the Developer or is waived by City.

11. 09 Waiver. All waivers must be in writing to be effective or binding upon the waiving party, and no waiver shall be implied fi. om any omission by a party to take any action with respect to such Event of Default. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party shall not constitute waiver of such party's right to demand strict compliance by such other party in the future.

11. 10 Scope of Waiver. No express written waiver of any Event of Default shall affect any other Event of Default, or cover any other period of time specified in such express waiver.

11. 11 Attorneys' Fees. Should legal action be brought by the City for breach of this Agreement or to enforce any provision herein, the City if it is the prevailing party of such action shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys fees, court costs and such other costs as may be fixed by the court.

Reasonable attorneys' fees of the City Attorney's Office shall be based on comparablefees or private attorneys practicing in Shasta County.

11. 12 Venue. In the event that suit shall be brought by either party to this contract, the parties agree that venue shall be exclusively vested in the State courts of the County of Shasta or where appropriate, in the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, Sacramento, California.

SECTION 12. TERMINATION.

12. 01 Effect of Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement, the rights, duties and obligations of the parties hereunder shall, subject to the following provisions, cease as of the date of such termination.

12. 02 Termination by City. If City terminates this Agreement because of Developer's default, then City shall retain any and all benefits, including money or land received by City hereunder.

SECTION 13. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES.

13. 01 Project as a Priivate Undertaking. It is specifically understood and agreedby and between the parties hereto that the developmentof the Project Site is a separatelyundertaken private development.

13. 02 Independent Contractors. The parties agree that the Project is a private development and that neither party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder.

Shastina Ranch Development Agreement 19 dune 23, 2005
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 265
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

13. 03 No Joint Venture or Partnership. City and Developer hereby renounce the existence of any form ofjoint venture or partnershipbetween them, and agree that nothing contained herein or in any document executed in connection herewith shall be construed as making City and Developer joint venturers or partners.

13. 04 No Third Party Beneficiaries. The only parties to this Agreement are Developer and City. There are no third par~y beneficiaries and this Agreement is not intended, and shall not be construed, to benefit, or be enforceable by any other person whatsoever.

13. 05 Ambiguities or Uncertainties. The parties hereto have mutually negotiated the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement and this has resulted in a product of the joint drafting efforts of both parties. Neither party is solely or independently responsible for the preparation or form of this agreement. Therefore, any ambiguities or uncertainties are not to be construed against or in favor of either party.

SECTION 14. APPLICABLE LAW.

This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Califomia.

SECTION 15. SUPERSEDURE OF SUBSEQUENT LAWS OF JUDICIAL ACTION.

The provisions of this Agreement shall, to the extent feasible, be modified or suspendedas may be necessary to comply with any new law or decision issued by a court of competent jurisdiction, enacted or made after the effective date which prevents or precludescompliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement. Itnmediately after enactment of any such new law, or issuance of such decision, the parties shall meet and confer in good faith to determine the feasibility of any such modification or suspension based on the effect such modification or suspensionwould have on the purposes and intent of this Agreement.

SECTION 16. COOPERATION IN THE EVENT OF LEGAL CHALLENGE.

In the event of any legal or equitable action or other proceeding instituted by any third party including a governmental entity or official) challenging the validity of any provision of this Agreement or the Potential Subsequent Development Approvals, should any be obtained, the parties hereby agree to cooperate in defending said action or proceeding.

SECTION 17. HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT.

Developer hereby agrees to, and shall defend, save and hold City and its elected and appointed boards, commissions, officers, agents, and employeesharmless from, any and all claims, costs and liability for any damages, personal injury or death, which may arise, directly or indirectly, from Developer's or Developer's contractors', subcontractors', agents or employees' operations under this Shastina Ranch Development Agreement 20 June 23, 2005
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 266
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) Agreement, whether such negligent operationsbe by Developer or by any of Developer's contractors, subcontractors, agents or employees.

SECTION 18. INDEMNIFICATION.

Developer shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its agents, officers and employees against and from any and all liabilities, demands, claims, actions or proceedingsand costs and expenses incidental thereto ( including costs of defense, settlement and reasonable attorneys' fees), which any or all of them may suffer, incur, be responsible for or pay out as a result of or in connection with any challenge to the legality, validity or adequacyof any of the following: (i) this Agreement; ( ii) the environmental impact report preparedin connection with the adoption of the Project; and ( iii) the proceedingsundertaken in connection with the adoption or approval of any of the above.

SECTION 19. NOTICES.

Any notice or communication required hereunder between City or Developer shall be in writing, and may be given either personally or by registeredmail, return- receipt requested.

Notice, whethergivenby registeredmail or personal delivery, shallbe deemedto have been given and receivedon the actual receiptby anyof the addresses designatedbelowas the partyto whom noticesare to be sent. Any party hereto mayat any time, upon written noticeto the other party hereto, designateany other addressin substitutionof the addressto which such noticeor communicationshallbe given. Such noticesor communicationsshallbe givento the partiesat their addresses set forth
below:To
City: City
ManagerCityof
Redding777 Cypress
Avenue Redding, Califomia
96001To
Developer: Shastina Ranch DeveloprnentCompany
Inc. 2970 Innsbruck
Drive Redding, California
96003 SECTION20.

EXHIBITS.20. 01 Designationof Exhibits. The referenceto a specified Exhibitin this Agreementis a referenceto a certain oneof the exhibitslisted below, as determinedby the accompanying letter
designation.ShastinaRanch Development Agreement 21 June23, APPROVEDPacket Pg. 267
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) Exhibit
Designation Description
Exhibit " A"
Exhibit " B"
Exhibit " C"
Exhibit " D"
Park Development and Park Facilities Impact Fee Credit Agreement Project location map
Project legal description
Shastina Ranch tentative map conditions

20. 02 Incorporation by Reference. All exhibits are deemed incorporatedby reference into this Agreement.

SECTION 21. SEVERABILITY.

If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement is held by a court of competent, jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect, unless enforcement of this Agreement as so invalidated would be unreasonable or grossly inequitable under all the circumstances or would frustrate the purposes of this Agreement.

SECTION 22. RECORDATION.

In order to comply with Section 65868.5 of the Development Agreement Statute and Section of the City Enacting Ordinance, the parties do herebydirect the City Manager to cause a copy of this Agreement to be recorded with the County Recorder of the County, within ten ( 10) days after passage by the City of the ordinance approving this Agreement.

SECTION 23. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.

This Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto contain all the representationsand the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof. Except as otherwise specified in this Agreement and the Exhibits hereto,' any prior correspondence, memoranda, agreements, warranties or representationsare supersededin total by this Agreement and Exhibits hereto.

SECTION 24. INTERPRETATION OF AGREEMENT.

Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Agreement, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief, and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect, and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares and represents that this Agreement is made without reliance upon any statement or representationnot contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent, or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by cottnsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Agreement and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Agreement is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party Shastina Ranch Development Agreement 22 June 23, 2005
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 268
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) shall be deemed to have been tlae drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.

SECTION 25. COUNTERPARTS.

This Agreement may be executed in duplicate counterpart originals, each of which is deemed to be an original, and all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

Executed at Redding, California on
IN WITNESS WItEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executed as of the dates written above.

CiTY OF REDDING DEVELOPER * see notes below
By By
John R. Mathena, Mayor Jeb Allen, Vice President
Shastina Ranch DevelopmentCompany, Inc.

DEVELOPER
By
Brent Day, Treasurer
Shasfina Ranch DevelopmentCompany, Inc.

FORM APPROVED: ATTEST:

Richard A. Duvemay, City Attorney Connie Strohmayer, City Clerk Notes: If the Developer is a Corporation, then this document must be executed by the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer, President or Vice- President, on the one hand, and the Corporations' Chief FinancialOfficer, Treasurer, Assistant Treasureror Secretaryon the other hand. Developer's signatUremustbe notarized.
6- 23- 05 PROJ\Shastina
Ranch/ ShastinaRanchDevAgnnnt-Final- 6.. 23- 05. wpd ShastinaRanch

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 269
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) EXHIBIT " A"

PARK DEVELOPMENT
AND

PARK FACILITIES IMPACT FEE CREDIT AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF REDDING
AND SHASTINA RANCH DEVELOPMENT COMPANY INC.

This agreement, dated , 2005, is an attachment to the Development Agreement by and between Shastina Ranch Development Company Inc., a California Corporation (DEVELOPER), and the City of Redding, a Municipal Corporation (CITY), pursuant to the authority of State of California Government Code §§65864 through 65869.5.

RECITALS
This Agreement is entered into in recognition of both DEVELOPER's and CITY's obligations under the Shastina Ranch DevelopmentAgreement ("Development Agreement"), which this Exhibit is an attachment to.

Specifically, this Exhibit Agreement implements DEVELOPER's obligations under Section 6. 01 (d) and CITY's obligations under Section 7. 01 (b) of the Development Agreement. This Exhibit Agreement also implements DEVELOPER's obligations under Condition 76 of the approved tentative subdivision map for Shastina Ranch Subdivision Map S- 7- 03 and Planned
DevelopmentPD- 5- 04. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority contained in the DevelopmentAgreement Legislation, and in consideration of the mutualcovenantsand promises of the parties herein contained, the
parties
agree as follows: AGREEMENTSECTION1 OBLIGATIONSOF
ANDCONTRIBUTIONSBY DEVELOPER 1. 01 Contributions. DEVELOPERagreesto performall the necessarytasks to complete a - acre park within the ShastinaRanch Subdivision, in the location shown on the approvedtentativemap. Said tasksshall include, as
a minimum, the following: A. Providean irrevocableofferof dedicationfor the park sitewith the recording of
the final subdivisionmap. B. Provide all design andengineeringservicesnecessaryto meet CITY' s design criteriaand
to construct the park. C. Obtain all environmentalclearances under the Califomia EnvironmentalQualityAct and obtain all required permitsnecessary to construct the park. Park Developmentand Park Facilities Impact Fee Agreement, APPROVEDPacket Pg. 270
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) D. Construct all park improvements as detailed in Section 3 of this Exhibit Agreement. Park Improvements may be completed in up to four ( 4) phases, based on an approved final design, as follows: The approvedfinal plan shall delineate the project phasingand list and quantify the detailed components to be included in each phase. The level of detail shall be adequate to establish accurate cost estimating and account for i[ nflation. The phasingplan shall include estimated time fi. amesfor each phase. Adjustments to the phasingplan may be made to address changes in the phasing of the subdivision that occur after the phasingplan is approved. These adjustmentsin the phasingplan are to be negotiated between DEVELOPER and staff and approved by the City Manager as an Addendum to this Agreement.

PHASE 1 The minimum improvements for Phase 1 shall consist of the following park elements, consistent with the approved final plan. Construction shall begin no later than the completion of the 80th home and be completed within 12 months:

1. Extend all utilities to the site to serve full buildout. Utility stubs will be extended to the approximate location of future- use areas basedon the approvedfinal plan. 2. Completefinal gradingof the entire storm- draindetention/parksite, including all
park surface- drainage elements 3. Hydroseedingdisturbedareas for erosion control, exceptthose areas describedin the itemsbelow, which willbe provided with a permanentsurfacesolution. 4. Irrigate and hydroseed the baseballand socceractiveplay fields using
the followingminimum standards:Install a new irrigationsystem (usingschedule40 plastic pipe and Rainbird70- 05 rotor irrigationheads and tripleswing joint assembles, embedded
in sand backfill or equal]).bo The new playingfield surface shall meetthe followingminimumstandards:6 inches of topsoil, rocks greaterthan 2 inchesshall be removedfi. om the top 6 inchesof the playingsurface. Thehydroseed mix shall be a Bermudahybrid mix and rye artd include mulch, fertilizer, and seed inoculate. The hydroseedmix shallbe appliedduring July or August to ensure properseedmaturityand growth prior
to the falldormant season. 5. Install2 ADA- accessibledrinking fountains in locationsapprovedby CITY.Constructthe Clow:r Creek AC Trail on the detention dike and one concrete connectorwalkwayfrom the park entrance to the dike trail. The connectorwalkwayshall be 6 feet wide andalso provide a direct connection to the playingfields.7. Complete 20 percentof the site landscape outside the playing fields as
illustratedon theapproved final plan. 8. Construct6 concretepicnic table pads and provide6 eight-
foot concrete picnictables with game boards.Park Developmentand Park Facilities

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 271
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

9. Provide 3 concrete pads for trash containers and provide 3 concrete containers.

10. Provide and install the park entry sign.

11. Provide park security lighting.

The baseball field shall have 60- foot baselinesand 250- foot center field post, and the soccer field shallhave a minimum70- x
100- yarddimension.PHASE 2 The minimumimprovementsfor Phase 2 shall consist of the following park elements, consistentwith the approved final plan. Constructionshall begin no later thanthe completionof the 160thhome and be complete within 12 months. Constructa group, picnicshelter witha minimum of 5 concrete-table capacity. The picnicshelter shall havea concreteslab, a slab for a barbeque and trashcontainer,nightlighting, hose bib, and 4 electricaloutlets. Theshelter shall have a 6- foot-wide concrete accessible routefrom the park entrance.

Provide 5 concrete picnictables, a concrete
trash container, and a concretebarbeque.Construct the playgroundelementswith a 4- foot- high securityfence, 2 points of access, securitylighting, and a 6- foot-wide concreteaccessible routefrom the parkentrance. Provide 10 shadetrees ( connectedto irrigationsystem) for the playgroundarea. 3. Construct25 percent of the site landscape, not including
the playing fields, as illustratedon the approvedfinal plan. 4. Replace all dyintg or dead plants or trees
and reseedand/ or refurbish all landscape/grassareas damaged by construction.PHASE 3 The minimum improvementsfor Phase3 shall consistof the followingpark elements, consistent wi[ th the approvedfinalplan.

Construction
shall beginno later than the completion
of the 2; 40~ h homeand be complete within 12 months.1.

Construct the restroomand
a 6- foot- wide concreteaccessibleroute from the park entranceto the restroom.

2. Construct25 percent of the
site landscape, not includingthe playing fields, as illustratedon the approved final plan.

3. Replace all dyingor
dead plantsor trees and reseed and/ or refurbishall landscape/grassareasdamaged by construction.PHASE 4 The minimu: m improvementsfor Phase 4 shall consistof the following parkelements, consistentwith the approvedfinal plan. Constructionshall begin no later than the completionof the 320th home and be

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 272
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8)

1. Complete all remaining elements of the park, not yet built, as required under the approved final plan.

2. Replace all dying or dead plants or trees and reseed and/ or refurbish all landscape/grass areasdamaged
by construction.E. Subsequentto CITYacceptanceof the park improvements, provide complete landscapemaintenancefor 120 days for' eachphase of development. All elementsof the landscape maintenancescheduleshall be approved in advance by CITY.F. At least30 daysprior to incurring any expenses, CITYshall be providedwith and approve as reasonablean engineer' s estimateof all projectcosts. At least 30 daysprior to start of construction, CITYshall be providedwith and approvethe final projectcoststo be used for calculatingthe level of Park and RecreationFacilitiesImpactFee (Park Fee) credit. Within 45 daysat~ er completionof park improvements, provide a financialaccountingof all expenses related to developmentof the park. Said accountingshall be used to confirmany park fees still owed by DEVELOPER. Shouldadditionalfeesstill be owed, the balanceof fees owedshall be spread evenlyover the remainingnumberof lc, ts in the development. Oncecalculated, the remaining per- lot fee shallbe collectedat the time a buildingpermiton each lot is issued. 1. 02 Obligations. DEVELOPER
is obligated to: A. Complete all park improvementswith out any public contributionother than the approvedcredit
towardPark Fees.B. Incorporatethe maintenanceof the park intotheformation of a LandscapeMaintenanceDistrict for the other publicamenities within the subdivision.C. DEVELOPERis obligatedto provide security for deferredand/ or credited park fees
in the followingmanner:Before recordationof each subdivisionphase, a bondshall be establishedfor Park DevelopmentFees otherwise due for the construction of parkimprovementsasoutlinedin Section1. 01 ( d) of this Agreement. The bond shallbe basedon the value of the ParkDevelopmentFees dueat the time of recordationof each phase of the subdivision map. The ParkDevelopmentFee shall be basedon the rate in effecton the dateof the recordation
of the subdivision phase. D. Should remainingfees be applied to lots, as outlinedin Section

1. Ol( f) above,DEVELOPERshallnotify all existing lot ownerswho now owe the fee and include notificationof that responsibility in any escrowinstructions for futurelot sales.SECTION
2 OBLIGATIONS OF CITY In considerationof DEVELOPERentering into this Agreement, CITY has agreedto the followingwith respectto the development of the park site. A. Review and approve/ rejectall submittalsfrom DEVELOPERin a timely manner. Park Developmentand Park Facilities ImpactFee

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 273
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) B. Provide DEVELOPER with a credit toward Park Fees up to the total of expenses submitted by DEVELOPER and approvedby CITY or the total amount of Park Fees due by DEVELOPER for Shastina Ranch Subdivision, wlxichever amount is less.

C. The total dollar amount available for credit toward expenses and the calculation to determine if there will be residual fees owed by DEVELOPER, shall be based on:

1. The Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fees in effect at the time lot recordation of each phase.

2. The total number of residential lots approvedby CITY.

As of January 15, 2005, the base Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee is $2, 820, plus 194 per bedroom. By City Ordinance, this fee is adjustedannually based on the Construction Cost Index ( CCI).

SECTION 3 REQUIRED PARK ELEMENTS AND DESIGN CRITERIA

3. 01 Required Park Elements. All park elements described in Section 3. 03 below shall be provided.

3. 02 Design Esthetics. The design elements and aesthetic treatments found throughout the Shastina Ranch subdivision shall also be carded into the park site, including decorative lighting fixtures; building materials and colors; landscape materials and planting palettes; paving patterns; materials and colors; site furnishings; and signage styles and colors. The City of Redding reserves the right to modify design elements if maintenance costs are deemed to be excessive.

3. 03 Design Criteria for the Collocation of Flood Detention Basin and Park Amenities. The collocation of a local flood- detentionfacilitywith this park site has been proposedby the developersas a cost- effectivemeans of consolidatingthe functions of runoffstorage and recreation within a singlesite. To be effective, a combined detentionbasin/ park layout creates different internalelevationvariations, or tiers, that have differingfrequenciesand depthsof inundationsand differing flood risk. Passiverecreationelements willbe locatedin portions of storm-water- detentionfacilitieshaving the greatestpotentialfor temporary inundation, while activerecreationelementsare located in areas having
lesser degreesof inundationrisk. A. The primaryuseat theShastinaRanch park site is active recreation areas for athletic games. Combinedwith the many acres of nearbyopen spacealreadyacquiredby CITY, the park will assist in providinglocalresidentswith accessto a full range of recreationactivities. The final configurationof the park site, as well as the nameof thepark, shall be approved by
the CommunityServices Department Director.B. The followingneighborhoodpark elements ( including noted quantities, materials, and dimensions) shall be consideredminimum base levels in a collocateddetentionbasin/ park facility:1. Require parkelements that can be located in areas designatedfor 5- year- flood events: Park Development and Park

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 274
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) a. Soccer field-- one required, 70- x 100- yard minimumdimensions, one permanentgoal post, sUbsurfacedrainagewill
be required. b. Softball fieh: l-- one required, outfield may be overlapped with soccer field, 250- foot outfield dimension, backstop, subsurface drainage will be required.c. Individualpicnic tableareas-- minimum five tables, set upon concrete pads, at leastoneavailable from the
park' s designated
accessibleroute. d. Drinking fountain.2. Requirepark elementsthat can be located in
areas designated for 25- year- flood events:a. Horseshoearidbocce ball courts-- 2 each ( total of 4), standard courtdimensions,at least one of each accessibleto peoplewith physicaldisabilities 3. Require park elementsthat can
be located in areas designated for 50- year-floodevents:ao Basketballcourt-- 2 required, full- court dimensions (84' long by 50' wide); 2 goal posts with blackboards, rims, and nets;
concretepaving painted
with standardcourt layoutmarkings; connectedto accessibleroute.b. Drinking fountain. 4. Park elementsthat must be located outsidethe flood- detentionbasin. a. Restroombuilding one required with two unisex stalls, ADA accessible.Group picnic shelter--one required, centrallylocated within park site, 5- table
minimum capacity, barbequestand, concretefloor, quick- couplerhose bib for cleaning, connectedto accessibleroute. Co Children' s playground--separate3, 000- square- foot minimumsize requiredfor each age group (2- 5 years and 5- 12 years), with wood fiber safety surfacing material. Imaginativedesign, layout, andthemesare encouragedto make the playgrounddistinctivefor the community. Each play area must includecomponents that provide each of the followingplay experiences, including, but not limited to:, sliding, rocking, swinging, climbing, and spinning. All equipment shall conform with the specificationsand
recommendationsof the Consumer ProductSafety Commission (CPSC); the American Society for Testing and Materials ( ASTM), F- 1487- 01 " StandardConsumer Safety PerformanceSpecification for Playground Equipmentfor Public Use"; the Americans with Disabilities Act (
ADA); and supplementalplay area guidelinesprovidedby the Architectural and Transportation

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 275
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) Low flow must be accommodated in a way that avoids the athletic fields and play areas and confines inundations to areas that require infrequent maintenance.

There must ' be a minimum 50- foot buffer betweenthe low- flow line and the
playingfields. b. Drainagewithin the facility shouldprovide for positive flow across elevatedtiersand to the basinfloor to prevent residual standing water within recreationareas. Co Undergrounddrainagesystemsshall be used to improve drainage efficiencywithin and : from recreationelementsto the basin floor.

Captured runoff dischargedinto the detention facility travelingthroughthe park site will be accomplishedthrough undergroundstorm drains ratherthan via open, overland valley channels, exceptfor the designated low- flow channel.d. Minimumgrade utilizedin activeand passiveturf areasshallbe

1. 5 percent.Maximumside slopes for turf areasshallbe 4: 1 to facilitate mowing and maintenance. Non-turfareascan be 3: 1. Side slopes adjacentto streets shouldbeno greaterthan 6: 1 to facilitatesecurity visibilityby law enforcement,
fire, and emergencypersonnel.Internalpark trailsshould be constructedof concretewith a minimumxvidth of 6 feet. These, paths shouldconnectthe neighborhood with the major recreation elementsand activityareas. Trails will not be located within the basin floor
whereinundationsare frequent. go Inflow and outflow structuresshall include provisionsto prevent accessby small children. This willincludethe installationof trash racksor rebar acrossthe open areas of thesestructures. This requirementis not applicable to
weirs or culverts that: i. Are greaterthan
42 inchesin diameter.ii. Are lessthan
200 feet in length. iii. Intersectground
levels on both ends. iv. Are structurallyresistant
to collapseor settlement.ho An emergencyspillwayshall be providedto allow excess flows to safely passdownstream. The design of the spillway shall be the
500- year return period event. Where appropriate, an energydissipatershallbe constructed at the point( s) of inflow dischargeinto the detention
facilityto help control erosion.jo The basinfloormay be designedto be regularly maintained as anearthenclearzone or it may be establishedas a " wetland" areawith prior approvalof a habitatmanagementplan by the U. S. ArmyCorpsof Engineers, the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the CaliforniaDePartmentof Fish and Gameto ensure Park Developmentand Park Facilities ImpactFee

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 276
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) Wildlife Service, and the California Department. of Fish and Game to ensure conformance with § 404 of the Clean Water Act. If such a plan cannot be concurred upon in advance, maintenance activities must be performed at a sufficient rate to preclude any establishment of wetlands that might provide a regulatory roadblock to effective removal of accumulated sediments and/ or pollutantsdepositedby
floodwaters.ko A maintenanceaccess roadwayshallbe providedfromthe topof the storm- water- detentionfacilityto the basin floor. Minimumroad widthshallbe 16 feet, with a maximumgradientof 12 percent, and providedwith a turnaround or
egress point.Executed at Redding,
Californiaon IN WITNESSWHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this AGREEMENT to be executedas of the dates
written above.CITY OF REDDINGDEVELOPER * see
notes below
By By John R. Mathena, Mayor Jeb Allen,
Vice PresidentShastina Ranch Development
Company,
Inc.

DEVELOPERBy Brent
Day, TreasurerShastina Ranch Development
Company, Inc. FORM
APPROVED:ATTEST:Richard A. Duvernay, City Attorney ConnieStrohmayer, City ClerkNotes:If theDeveloperis a Corporation, then this documentmust be executedby the Corporation's Chief Executive Officer, President or Vice-President, on the one hand, and the Corporations' Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer,Assistant Treasureror Secretaryon the other hand. Developer's signature must
be notarized. 6- 20-
05 PROJXShastinaRanch~Exh A- ParkDev- FacilitieslmpactFeeCredit-DD. wpd Park Development and Park APPROVEDPacket Pg. 277
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) EXItlBI:[' *~ B~¥

FACI PLAN
I

SHAST NA RANCH
SOU. CE:

GIS DIVISION

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
I I
0 5~ . 1000 1500

LOCATION MAP

SHASTINA RANCH SUBDIVISION

AND FACILITY PLAN AREA
DR. 1- OS, S- 7-
05, GPA-
4-
03 & RZ- 8- O$ MTG.

DATE: ITEM: ATTACHMENT:DWG. NO:

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 278
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) EXHIBIT " C"

LEGAL DESCRIPTION

SHASTINA RANCH SUBDIVISION
All that certain real property sita~ate in the City of Redding, County of Shasta, State of California, more particularly described as fi) llows:

PARCEL 1
The Southwest one- quarterof Section22, Township31, North, Range4 West, MDM. PARCEL
2 That portionof the South one-half of the Southeastone- quarterof Section21, Township31North, Range 4 West, MDM, whichlies Northeasterly of the Anderson-CottonwoodIrrigation DistrictCanalas describedin the Deed from WesleyW. Harris, recordedin the office of theCountyRecorderMarch 9, 1938, in Book 132of OfficialRecords at page 431, Shasta
CountyRecords.PARCEL3 Thatportionof Parcel C as shown on the survey entitledRecord of Survey for Vern Caseyand Ned Hissem in the Northwestone- quarterof Section22, Township31 North, Range4 West, MDM,filed for record November19, 1971, in volume36 of Land Surveys at
page 89, ShastaCountyRecords.EXCEPTINGTHEREFROMall that portionthereofconveyedto the City of Reddingby deed recordedDecember
27,
1999, InstrumentNo. 1999- 0048938.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 279
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) June23,
2005 Douglas
DeMallieEXItlBIT "
D" Tentative
Subdivision Map ApplicationSr7- 03
Planned' DevelopmentApplication PD-
5- 04 Shastina
Ranch Subdivision DraftConditions
of APproval
General RequirementsConditionsmarkedwith an asteriskare also envirtnmental mitigation measures. Conditionsmarkedwith' a doubleasteriskare to be indicatedon the final map as notes.Approvalis granted to develop the 446- home
Shastina RanchSubdivision/iPlannedDevelopment. Thefinal map shall be preparedand developmentcommencedin accordancewith the tentative map and relatedplanned developmentplan as approved by the City Councilon The requirementsof theseconditions shall prevailin theeventthat there is any inconsistencybetween a conditionand informationor data presentedon thetentativemap or in the planneddevelopmentplan.

Implementationof theseconditionsshall also be in conformance with the project Development Agreement.The standard conditionsfor subdivisionsdelineatedin Resolution92- 18 shall be met as
marked on the attachedtbrm. o The developershall notethat Section 711. 4 of the State Fish and GameCode requirespaymentof a fee to the County Clerkfor filing a Notice of Determinationfor an environmentaldocument:; paymentof thisfee is the responsibilityof the project proponent.Inaccordance with Chapter18. 40. 040 of the Zoning Code (Compliance With MapRequirements), all conditionsapplicable to postsubdivision construction (as markedwith a doubleasterisk **) shall be noted en the finalmap under a " Statement of Conditions" to provide notificationto furore propertyownersof buildinglimitationsand
other requirementsfor the subdivision.Acquisitionof all off- site interestsin tire or easementsnecessaryto satisfy the requirementsof the subdivisionapprovalshall be the responsibilityof the developer. In the event the developeris unable to. acquire suchinterests, the developer may petitiontheCity Council for adoption of a resolutioninitiatingeminent domainproceedings over the lands needed for the off- site improvements. ~e developershall bea/- all" 6osts for such proceedings, including
attorneyfees, court costs:, andland- valuecosts. Prior to issuance Of a grading or building permit, the developershall secure approvalof improvementplans for all public- street, utility, and drainageinfi' astructureand public park and trail facilitiesfrom Se City Engineer. Unless otherwisenotedherein, all public- street, storm- drain, and utility improvements required of the subdivision shall comply withCity Public Works ConstructionStandardsor equivalent
standardsas approvedby the City Engineeror affected private- Utility company.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 280
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
2 June 23, 2005 10. Thefollowingnotation :shallbe placedon the final mapwithinstructions thatit be disclosedin the title reportissuedupon conveyanceof any lot/ home withinthe subdivision: "This subdivisionis located withinthe airport influence area of the Redding MunicipalAirport.Aircraft and helicopterflights will occurover the subdivision, and the numberof flights will increaseas aircraft
activityat the airportincreases."* ** At thetime of recordationof a final map( s), the propertyowner shall grant the City of Reddingan avigationeasementfor flight operationsof the ReddingMunicipal Airport. The form and contentof theeasementshall be approvedby the CityAttorney.* This conditionshall be recordedon the final map and noted in the title report. The escrowinstructionsfor the sale of eachlot shall require that thepurchaser and sellersign a statementthat they have readand[ understandthis conditionof sale.

The propertyowner(s) shallconsentto the formationof and participationin a landscape maintenancedistrict for all:** ao lxrigation, landscape, and arterial fencingwithinthe public right-
of way of ShastaView Drive. bo Irrigationand lm~dscapewithin the public fight- of- way of all internallocal
streets, including parkwaysbetween the curb and gutter. Co Irrigation and landscapeassociatedwith pedestrian
connectionsbetweeninternalstreetsand ShastaViewDrive. Irrigationand lan, dscape associated with the pedestrian
path betweenthe project and RanchoVista Way. eo All subdivision entrancefeatures
and monumentidentificationlocated
within the public right- of- way. Park and' trail facilities.

Storm- water detentionfacilities, includingthose located within the publicipark. Storm-
water trea'~ nent facilitiesand erosion-control measures.Vegetationmanagement for fire-fuel reduction.Saiddistrict shall be formed in accordancewith the following:Prior to recordationof a final map, theproperty owner( s)
shall submita landscape maintenancedistrictpetitionand consent form, a landscape maintenanceagreementform, and applicableapplicationfees to the DevelopmentServicesDepartment. The district shall be fbrmed and the landscape installed prior to issuance of a buildingpermitfor any structurewithin the subdivision. Formationof the district will obligate each lot owner withinthe subdivision to participatein the district.

A cost- escalationclausewill
APPROVED Packet Pg. 281
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- T03 and
PD- 5- 04 Draft
Conditionsof
ApprovalPage3
June 23, 2005 The landscapeand associatedirrigationsystem for the district shall be designedin accordance with the specificationsavailable from the DevelopmentServices Departmentand installedin accordancewith the final plansas approved by the City. The landscapeand irrigationplans shallbe submitted to the DevelopmentServicesDepartmentat l~ he time the subdivisionimprovement plansare submitted to the EngineeringDivisionandare subjectto approval prior to recordation ora final map. The. irrigationsystem shall be installedand acceptedby the City in conjunctionwith the publicimprovementswithin the subdivision; landscape improvementsshall be installedand acceptedby the City priorto issuanceof a building permit
within the subdivision.The developer shall be responsiblefor all costs and fees associated with the formation, installation, and connectionto City of Redding Electric and water utilities. Such fees include, but are not necessarily limited to, formation costs, meter fees, connectioncharges, benefitfees, inspection fees, and developmentfees. The developershall also be responsiblefor maintenanceof the landscapeand irrigationsystemuntil suchtime as the districtis formed and fees are levied. The minimummaintenanceresponsibilityshall be 90 days for plantmaterialand 1 year for the irrigationsystemfrom the date improvementsare accepted by the City. PlannedDevelopmentand
Site Design Requirements11. Developmentof the lots and projectfeatures/ amenitiesshall be consistent withthe exhibits containedin the ShastinaRanch PlannedDevelopment Plan approvedin conjunction with
the tentativesubdivision map.**12. Lot configurationand developmentshall complywith the requirements of the zoningdistrict appliedto the property in accordancewith Chapter18 ( Zoning Ordinance) of the ReddingMunicipal Code
with the: followingexceptions:**The minimumlot width and size of certainlots on the east side of Clover Creekmay be below the "RS-3" Districtstandardof 70 feet and 7, 000 squarefeet, respectively,as
shown on the tentativemap. ' 'b. All comer lots shallhavea minimumwidthof 65 feet at the street.The minimumfront- yardsetback for homes on Streets " J" through " T" maybe13 feetexcept garages, whichwill have a minimumsetbackof 20 feet).13. Lots 1, 42, 43, 44, and 46 shall be adjusted, or additional landacquired, as
necessaryto conform to project boundaries.14. The developmentof industrial Parcel "A" shall meetthe requirementsof Section18. 40. 020, Buffer

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 282
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
4 June
23, 200515. 16. Priorto recordationof a final map for the firstphase of development, a comprehensivefinal projectdevelopmentplanshallbe approved by the Development ServiceDirector. This
plan shall consist of: a. Anymodificationsor updates of the Planned DevelopmentPlan exhibits.b. Landscapeplan :for all street and project-amenity landscaping.c.

Project- entrance and
identification sign features.d. Decorativestreetlights. e. ShastaView Drive wall
design.f. Park and trailfacilities.The developershall constructa public trail on both sides of CloverCreekgenerally located as shownon the Planned[ DevelopmentPlan and tentativemap exhibits, includingsectionson the City propertyto the north. The sectionof trail on the east side of CloverCreek shallbe constructedprior to or in conjunctionwith construction of the adjacentpublic park improvements. The sectionof trail on the westside of CloverCreek shall be constructed withthe first phase of developmentof that area located between ShastaView Drive and CloverCreek. The structural sectionfor the trail and connectionsto the subdivisionshall comply with Cityof. Red. dingConstructionStandard 111.
0 and be as follows:Co On the east side of Clover Creek, an 8- foot- wide asphalt section with 2- foot- wide compactedbaseshouldersbetween ShastaView Driveto the south
and the west end of Street " P"
to the north. On the west side of Clover Creek:
1) An 8- foot- wideasphaltsection with 2- foot- wide compactedbaseshoulders betweenShasta View Driveto the south and the
north projectboundaryat a point convergingwith the sidewalkalongShasta View Drive.2) A 10- foot.-wide asphaltsection with2- foot- wide compacted base should. ers on the City property to the north.

This sectionof trail shall incorporate
a drinkingfbuntain, benches, picnictables, trashreceptacles, and signageas specifiedby theCommunity ServicesDirector. All trailsectionswill be
designed to avoidremovalof, yet alsomeander in proximityto, significanttreesto the extent feasible.Internalconnectionsto the trail shallbe constructed at the west end of

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 283
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
5 June 23, 2005The developerslhall be responsiblefor securing of permits from agenciesother than the City necessm~y to constructthe trail improvements.

The City recognizes that some scheduling, alignment, or design modificationsmay be necessary
to securethesepermits. The landand constructioncosts of the trail will not be credited towardthe project' s Park and Recreation FacilitiesImpactFee obligation, except for that sectionlocated
within the public
park. Streetsand Circulation17. A maximumof 49 lots may be recordedon each side of Clover Creek with a singleaccess providedby an extensionof ShastaView Drive fi. om either Rancho Road or AirportRoad, generally on the alignment delineatedon the tentativemap. Upon recordation of the 50th lot on either side of Clover Creek, ShastaView Driveshall be constructedto connectRanchoRoad and Airport Road, : includingthe necessarycrossingat Clover Creek. As an alternativeto the 49- 1ot limiton tire east side of CloverCreek, additional lots beyond 49 may be
recorded traderthe following requirements: ao A temporary secondeastboundlane is constructed in Shasta View Drive betweenAirportRoad ancl Street "Q"; the secondlane shall be convertedto the landscape medianrequiredby other conditionsof the tentativemap approval at the time the Shasta View Drive connection between Airport Road
and Rancho Road is completed.*No morethan 49 lots may be recordedpriorto constructionof Street " I," providinga secondaccessto the subdivision fi. om ShastaViewDrive. c. None of the additionallotsmay be recorded
north
of Street " T." 18. 19. Shasta View Drive shallbe designedbased upon a 35 mile - per- hourdesignspeed, minimum centerlineradius of 800 feet, minimumtangentbetweenreverse curves of 100 f~ et, and meeting
sight distance standardsat all intersections.On- site, ShastaView Drive shall be constructedto thefollowingstandard:a. Whereproject developmentis adjacent to both of sidesShasta View
Drive: 1) Dedication of a 142- foot right- of- way.
2) A 16- foot- wide landscapemedian, two 12- foot- wide travel

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 284
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
6 June 23, 200520. 3) A 1 O- foot-
wide, 4- inch- thick meanderingconcretepedestrian/bicycle path and landscapeparkwaybetweenthe curbandright- of- way boundary. The path shall be constructedat a location and elevationbased upon the ultimate widening; of Shasta ViewDrive to 4 lanes and be
separateda minimumof 10 feet from the ultimatecurb line. 4) Turn lanes at all intersectionsas definedin the Traffic Impact Study and as
specifiedby the City Engineer in conformancewithstandardengineering practice. 5) Arterial
wall and landscapeimprovementsrequired by other conditionsof this entitlement.bo Where Shasta View Driveis adjacentto designatedopen space, the right- of- way widthmay be red'. uced to
127 feetand the parkwaywidthadjacent to the open space reducedaccordingly.Co A traffic circle at the intersectionof ShastaView Drive andStreet "D" with
necessaryright- of- way and improvements in accordancewiththe specificationsof the City Engineer.do Additionalright- of- way will be dedicatedas specifiedby the City
Engineer to accommodatea future trafficcircle at the
intersectionof Shasta View Drive and Street " H." Off- site, ShastaView Drive shall
be improved as follows:On Assessors's Parcel
No. 054-510-27 ( property immediatelywest of Lots 102 through 112): 1) Dedication of 100 feet of right- of way. 2)
A 16- foot--wide landscapemedian, two 12-
foot- widetravellanes, 6- foot- wide paved shoulders
symmetricalto the ultimate centerline, and verticalcurb and'~. gutter on ' the projectside of thestreet. 3) A 1 O- foot- wide, 4- inch-thick meanderingconcretepedestrian/bicyclepath and landscapeparkway betweenthe curb and right-of- way boundary. The path shall
be constructedat a location and elevationbasedupon the ultimatewideningof Shasta View Driveto 4
lanes and be separateda mini: mum of 10

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 285
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
7 June 23, 2005 Co 1) The developershall enter into a developmentagreement with the City or otherwisesecureapprovalfor use of Cityproperty for constructionof this section
of ShastaView Drive. 2) A 16- foot- wide landscape
median, two 12- foot-widetravel lanes, 6- foot- wide paved shoulderssymmetricalto the ultimate
centerline, andverticalcurb and gutter on the east side. 3) A 1 O- foot- wide asphalt pedesthan/bicycle path with 2- foot- wide compactedbase shoulderson the east side designedto meanderwithin open space betweenthecurb and Clover Creek. The structuralsection of the trail shallcomplywith City of Redding ConstructionStandard111. 0. ( Thissection of trail
will ' be a substitute for a sidewalk
along the eastside of ShastaView Drive.) Remaining
off- si~ te sectionto Rancho
Road: Dedicationof a 60- foot- wide right- of- way and
anyadditionalright-of-way necessaryto transitioninto RanchoRoad. 2) Two 12- foot- widetravel lanesand 6- foot- wide paved shouldersseparated by 16 feet for a future landscapemediansymmetrical'to the ultimate centerline.The designfor a
median at the intersectionwith Rancho Road may be adjusted fbr or eliminatedas necessaryto align with existingShasta ViewDrive norLhof Ranch Road. 3) Trafficcontrol, stripingand signage, mm lanes, and accelerationand deceleration lanes, tie- in paving, and AC overlay to providefor conformanceto the existingroadwayat the intersection of Rancho
Road and Shasta
View Drive. Ultimate intersection geometricas defined in the Traffic
Impact Study, Figure 6- 6, and including 6-
foot bike
lanes, shall be constructed as follows:a) Rancho
Road:

One 370- foot eastboundleft-mm lane ( including90- fbot

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 286
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
8 June 23, 2005
do b) Shasta View: Two 360- footnorthbound
left- mm
lanes and 1 northboundthrulane. The northboundright mm
is shared with the thru lane. One315- foot
southbound
left- mm lane and 1
southbound thru lane. One280- foot
southboundfight- mm lane. Remaining off- site sectionto Airport Road: 1) Dedication of a 60-
foot right- of- way and any additional right- of- way necessary to transitioninto AirportRoad. 2) Two 12- tbot-widetravel lanes and 6- foot- widepaved shouldersseparatedby 16 feet for a future landscapemediansymmetricalto the ultimate centerline.The designfor a median at the intersectionwith AirportRoad may
be adjusted :[' or or eliminatedas necessaryto align with the planned street on the oppositeside of AirportRoad. 3) Traffic control, stripingand signage, mm lanes, and accelerationand decelerationlanes, tie- in paving, and AC overlay to provide for conformanceto the existingroadwayat the intersectionof AirportRoad and the New Connection.

Ultimate
intersectiongeometricas
definedin the Traffic Impact
Study, Figure6- 6, and including 6- foot bikelanes,
shall
be constructed
as follows: a) New Connection:

One 300- foot eastboundleft- mm lane. The 1 eastbound
travellane
becomesright- turn only
at the intersection.Airport Road:One 340- foot northboundleft-

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 287
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03 and
PD~ 5- 04 Draft
Conditionsof
ApprovalPage9
June;
23,
2005

21. 22.

23. 24.

25. 26. 27. 28. Priorto recordationof the 120th lot, the developershall install a traffic signal at the intersectionof Rancho. Road and ShastaView Drive and the intersection modifiedas necessaryto achieve a fully activatedsystem for both vehicles and pedestrians.Improvementsshall include all necessary wiringand installation of hardware ( video detection, indicatorheads, buttons) and streetstriping for the traffic signal to respondto pedestrianor vehicle- phase request. Intersectionimprovements shall includeany necessarymodificationsto the existingShastaView Drive northof Rancho Road
to accommodatethe signal.*Prior to recordationof the 200th lot, the developershall installa traffic signalat the intersectionof Airport Road and ShastaView Drive and the intersectionmodified as necessaryto achieve a fully activated systemfor both vehicles and pedestrians.Improvements .shall includeall necessarywiring and installation of hardware (video detection, indicator heads, buttons) and street stripingfor the traffic signal to respond to
pedestrianor vehicle-phase request.* Bus-stop turnoutsand passengershelters for ReddingAreaBus Authority (RABA) service shall be incorporatedinto the on- site improvementof Shasta View Drive in locationsspecified by RABA. Improvementsshall be in accordancewith
City of ReddingConstructionStandard120.00.* The ShastaViewDrive crossingof Clover Creek shallbedesignedto accommodatefuture wideningto 4 lanes, pass flows from a 100- year- storm event, and incorporatedesign and materialfeaturesconsistentwith the ShastinaRanchPlanned DevelopmentPlan to the
extentfeasible andas allowed by the City Engineer.No portionof the ultimatealignment of ShastaView Drive shallencroachinto the 100- year floodplainof CloverCree. k, exceptthe actualcreek crossing, unlessapprovalis granted under the provisionsof Chapter 18. 51 of the Redding MunicipalCode: The ultimatealignment, 'width, and constructionof Shasta View Drive shall be designed to locate the existing ReddingElectric Utility (REU) l15/ 12kV powerpoles within the parkways a minimum of 3 feet from the ultimatecurbline. Whereno alternative is feasibleas determinedby REU a~ ad the City Engineer, an' existingpole(s) may be located within a landscape median or traffic circle withprovisionof adequatevehicular protectionand maintenanceaccess. The costof any necessarypole relocation
to meetthis requirementshallbe the responsibilityof the developer.Individuallot accessrights to and from ShastaView Driveshall be waived.A minimum6- foot- high masonrysound wall shallbe constructed at the boundaryof the Shasta View Drivefight- of- way adjacentto all residentiallots; the wall is not requiredadjacentto any open-spaceareas. The wall shall be constructedof decorativemasonry materials that havea density of 4 pounds persquare foot.

Thewall design shall incorporatematerialsproviding2 distinctsurfacereliefs, columns/ pilastersarticulateda minimumof 2 inches fromthe face of the
APPROVED Packet Pg. 288
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
10 June
23, 2005 29. 30. The structuraldesignof the wall along Shasta View Drive shall meetapplicable loadingpressuresas defined by
the UniformBuilding Code. Internallocal streets shallbe improved generally as follows: a. Streets "A" through "G," " M," "
Q," and " V": Co 1) Right- of- way encompassing
the full street-improvementsectionfrom backof
sidewalkto back of sidewalk ( 61 feet).
2). 40- foot- wide curb- face to curb- face streetsection. 3)
Vertical curb, gutter, 6- foot- wideparkway, and 4- foot-wide sidewalk on both sides.4) The developershall acquirethe necessaryoff- site right-of- way for Street "B" as shown, on the tentativemap without theuse of
eminent domain, or the
subdivisiondesign shall be modifiedso that the full
streetright- of- way is on- site.Streets "
H" and '" I": 1) Right- of- way
encompassingthe full street- improvement section from back of sidewalk to backof sidewalk (57 feet).2) 40- foot-
wide curb- face to curb- face street section. 3) Verticalcurb, gutter, 6- foot-
wide parkway, and 4- foot- wide
sidewalkadjacent to the residentiallots and the public
parksite. 4) Verticalcurb, gutter, and 6- foot-
wide parkway adjacent to the Clover Creek
open space. Streets "J" through " R" ( except "M"): 1) Right-of- way

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 289
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
11 June
23,
2005 31. 32.

33. d. Street "T": 1) Right-of' way encompassingthe full street section from backof sidewalkto
back of sidewalk ( 60 feet).
2)
30-
foot- wide curb- face-to- curb- face street section. 3) 4) Vertical
curb, gutter, 1 O- foot-
wide parkway and 4- foot- wide sidewalkon both sides.Low- pro: file " No Parking" signage.Pedestrianconnectionsbetweeninternalstreets "G," "R," and "V" and ShastaView Drive andStreet " P" and RanchoVista Way shallbe providedas indicatedon the tentative map. A minimum 32- foot- wide public easement(s) shall be provided to ShastaView Drive and a 20- foot- widepubliceasement to
RanchoVistaRoad. The easements shall be improved with an 8- foot- wide concretesidewalk and the remainderof the easement landscaped.A 1 O- foot- wide public-serviceeasement shallbe provided adjacentto the outside edge of theseparated sidewalkon all internal streets. On those
sectionsof Streets " H" and ' T' adjacent to the CloverCreek open space where no sidewalk is required, a 5- foot- widepublic-service easement shall be provided. All
landscape features within an on- site
street right- of- wayshallbe landscaper! andan irrigationsystem providedat the time of constructionof the street improvements. These features consist of:
a. Medians withinShasta View Drive. b. Traffic circle at t~ he intersectionof ShastaView Driveand Street "D." Parkways between thecurb and right- of- way boundarywithin ShastaView Drive.

Where adjacent to designatedopen space, the landscapebetweensidewalk and right- of- way boundary shall be designed to blend into the natural featuresof the open space with emphasis on preservationof existingtrees. d. Parkwaysbetween the curb and sidewalkof all internalstreets.eo Additionalstreetscapeenhancementsalong internalstreetsas presentedon the tentativemap andthe Shastina Ranch Planned DevelopmentPlan ( e. g., length of Street " T"; intersections of Streets "

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 290
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
12 June
23,
2005

34. 35. 36. 37. 38. The right- of- way for Street " P" may encroachinto the City- ownedland (Assessor's Parcel No. 054- 510- 026), only if it is demonstratedto the satisfaction of the Development ServicesDirector that the encroaclhmentaccommodatesefficient lot configuration and enhancespublic access to the CloverCreekTrail. City-standarddecoratiw~- streetlights (ConstructionStandards557. 00 through 574.01) shall be providedalongthe on- site section of ShastaView Drive and all internalstreets.Constructionaccess to the site shall be identifiedon the projectimprovement plans. Temporary or permanenttraffic- controland accessimprovementsor measuresshall be provided as required by ' the City Engineer. Use of SylviaLane, Belinda Way, RanchoVista Drive, andPalo VerdeI, ane for constructionaccess is prohibited.Prior to issuanceof an entitlementfor furtherdivision, development, or use of the industrialParcel "A," the applican't, owner, or successorin interest shall in consultation with the City prepare a project study report to determinepreliminaryConstructiondesignand the appropriate Shastina Ranch projectshareof the cost of thefollowing improvements:* **ao Determinationof an alignmentand wideningto a 4- lane arterialstandard the section of ChumCreekRoad betweenSouth BonnyviewRoad
and RanchoRoad, including reconstructionof the ChumCreek bridge as necessary.Realigxunent/reconstmctionof the intersectionsof Victor Avenueand Rancho Road with ChumCreekRoad to provideadequatetraffic controland mm lanes.c. Placementof a traffic signal at the intersectionof RanchoRoadandAlta Mesa Drive. TheShastina Ranchpro- ratashare shallbe paid, or a funding mechanism approvedby the City, prior to
issuance
of
an entitlement for furtherdivision, development, or use of industrialParcel " A." ao bo Thedevelopershallpay the Citywide Transportation DevelopmentImpactFee in accordancewith Chapter16. 20 of the Redding MunicipalCode.* Prior to filing of a finalmap for residentialdevelopmentor issuance of entitlement or building permiit for developmentof the industrialland, the applicant, owner, or successor in interestshall agreeto participatewith the City of Redding in a. funding mechanism to ensure the construction of
improvements at the Chum Creek Road/Victor Avenue/Rancho Road intersections as necessary to maintainacceptablelevel- of- serviceoperations. The applicant, owner, or successorin interest shall agreeto participate

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 291
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
13 June
23,
2005
Sewer,

39. 40.

41. 42.43. 44. Notwithstanding (b) above, up to a maximumof 120 lots maybe recordedon the east side of Clover Creek with sole accessfromAirportRoad ( i. e., no crossingof Clover Creek) priorto final establishment of a funding mechanism for the improvementof the Chum Creek Road/ VictorAvenue/ Rancho Road intersection. Payment of a project-specific facilityfee, establishedby the City Councilor its designeeequal to the project' s pro rata share of the intersectionimprovements, shall be madeat the
time of issuance of
a buildingpermit.Water, andElectricUtilities No unit or phase of thesubdivision shallbe recorded unless it is contiguous to an improvedpublic street and sewer, water, electrical, and drainagefacilitiesadequate to servethe propertyhave been extended to the unit or phaseboundary. Sanitarysewer, water, electric, natural gas, communication, and cable- distributionlines,including main lines andservice laterals, shallbe extended and sizedto serve each lot in the subdivisionto providelogical extensions of serviceto adjacentproperties and accommodateimprovementsconstructedwith the trail sectionon the City- ownedparcel to the north Assessor's ParcelNo. 0, 54510026).

These utilities shall be installed in accordancewith the capacity, construction, ~ad testingstandards of the City or other responsibleagencyor utility.Sewer lineswithin the subdivision shallbe sized as
necessaryto accommodateupstreamdevelopmentin an orderlyfashion. A 24- inch waterline shall be extended in the Shasta ViewDrive right- of- way, providinga loop connecting to existingwaterlinesin Rancho Road and AirportRoad in accordancewiththe City of ReddingMasterWaterPlan. The waterlineshall includea lateral for connectionto the City well site as shownon the tentativemap and water service to the City- owned parcel to the north (Assessor's Parcel No. 054- 510-026). The developer may seek reimbursementfor cost of line oversizingbeyond the requirementsof the subdivisionin accordance withChapter14. 08 of the ReddingMunicipalCode. Theactuallaborcosts of improvementsto be eligiblefor reimbursementshall
be as determinedby the City Engineerand as allowedby the ReddingMunicipal Code.Thedevelopershall grantto the CityofReddinga well site with a minimumsizeof 200 feet by 200 feet ( 40, 000 square feet) on the west side of ShastaViewDrivegenerallyas shownon the approvedtentative map. The City agrees to pay for a testwell to determine waterqualityanalysis to determineifa productionwell can be developed. If water qualityanalysis is not satisfactory, the City may requirethat an alternatesite be tested and developed.Water servicewithinthe subdivision and fire hydrantsshall be providedin accordance with the specificationsof the EngineeringDivisionand in a manner satisfying the CaliforniaFireCode.

All fire hydrantsmusthave a minimum fire flow meetingAppendixIII " A" of the CaliforniaFire Code, plus meetthe maximum daily demandfor the area. Fire- hydrant locationsshall be approvedby

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 292
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
14 June 23, 2005 45. All on- site and off- site sewer,
water, electrical, storm-drain andotherpublic- utility infrastructureshall be pllacedin a public- streetright-of- way or public- service easementin a location approvedby the EngineeringDivision. The developer shall be responsiblefor acquisitionof all necessaryoff- siteright-of- waysor easements. 46. A note shall be placed on the final map(s) that no buildings, mechanical
equipment, decks or patios, or similar permanentimprovementmay be placedwithin a public- serviceeasement.**47. Vehicularaccessfor maintenance purposesshall be providedto all utilityinfrastructure outsidea
public right- of' wayas determinednecessary by andin a manner approvedby the City Engineer. 48. Beforeapproval of the finalimprovementplansby the Engineering Division for plan check, the
applicant shall also incorporate1 copy of the Cityof ReddingElectricDepartmentplans for providing electric service. 49. Electric-supply facilitiesshall be furnishedand installedin accordance with theElectricUtilityServicePolicy
Resolutioncurrentlyin effect at the timethe developer's plans are approved by the Cityof Redding. 50. Thedevelopershall be responsible for all costsassociated withthe relocationor modificationof utility facilitiesnecessitatedby the constructionof improvementsrequired as a condition of approval of this project, including reimbursementto City of ReddingElectricUtility. Other utilities may require reimbursementfor project- related costs as well. 51. The final subdivision map( s) shall indicate minimumbuilding setbacklinesnecessary to complywith ReddingElectric Utility ( REU) standards for structureclearancefrom pad- mountedtransformers; the setbackshall be indicated only on those lots where the setback requirement of tlhe City Zoning Ordinancewill not satisfythe REU standard. 52. The existing ReddingElectricUtility ( REU) 115/ 12kV transmission-lineeasementshallbe identifiedon the final map(s). An all- weather- access road and easement to the sectionof
this line south of Lots
39 and 40 shallbe providedin a manner that avoids impacts upon sensitive enviromnental featuresin this area. Grading, Drainage, and Water Quality An applicationshallbe submittedto the City Engineerfor clearing and/ or grading permit. Improvementplansfor clearing, grading, drainage, utilities, and other requiredimprovementsshall be approvedby the EngineeringDivision andother concerned City of Reddingdepartmentsprior to the beginning of any clearing orgradingactivities or site improvementactivities and will be in conformanceto ReddingMunicipalCode ( RMC) Title 16. 12. An InterimErosionand Sediment ControlPlan ( Interim Plan) shall be includedas part of all clearingand gradingpermit applications and will be approved by the City Engineerbefore APPROVED Packet Pg. 293
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
15 June
23,
2005

54. 55.

56. 57. 58. 59. Priorto issuanceof a gradingpermit, thedevelopershall prepare a Storm WaterPollution PreventionPlan and secure a ConstructionActivity StormWater Permit from the Regional Water QualityControl Board (RWQCB) if requiredby law. Additionally, all applicableprovisionsof the City of Redding Grading Ordinance (ReddingMunicipalCode Chapter16. 12) shall be met. This will requirein part that an Interim ErosionandSedimentControlPlan be prepared that establishesspecific measures andBest ManagementPractices to minimizesoil erosion during and after construction activities. Approval and installationof interim erosion- and sediment- control measuresshall be coordinatedwith the sequenceof gradinganddevelopmentso as to bein placeby September1 of any year. The detailsof the InterimErosionand Sediment Control Plan and any applicablewaterquality mitigationrequirementsof the RWQCBshall be incorporated into the finalprojectimprovement plansand be fully implementedby the developeras approvedby the City Engineer.Prior to improvement-plan approval, the applicant shall obtainapproval for storm-water peak flow in accordancewith CityCouncilPolicy 1806 and the specificationsof the EngineeringDivision. Suchmeasuresshall address impacts from the 10-, 25-, and 100- year- storm events. Projectsshall address peak flowsto maintain predevelopmentlevels at all locationsdownstreamof the project. A hydrologicaldrainagereport shall be preparedby a qualified engineerand will be provided to
the Engineering Division with submittal of site improvementplans. Storm- drain detentionfacilities shall conformto the design intent ofCity General Plan GoalCDD6for functionand aestheticvalue. Uponagreementwith the City and design approval by the City Engineerand CommunityServices
Director, storm- water detention may be incorporatedinto the public park.

Any storm- water detentiionfacilities constructedwithinthe electric-utility easement(s) on industrial Parcel "A" as shown
on the tentativemap shall require the writtenconsent of the utility provider. A final map for any portionof the project withinthe Chum Creek watershedshall not be recordeduntil a final methodof conveyingstorm water to ChumCreek, eitheras describedin the project EIR- 1- 03 or other functional alternative, is approved by the City Engineer. Any storm- drainconveyanceutilizing oi~ otherwise
affectingAndersonCottonwoodIrrigationDistrict ( ACID) easementsor facilitiesshall necessitatethe writtenapprovalof ACID.* All drainage outlets into Clover Creek or any other natural drainagefeatureareto incorporatewater- velocity-attenuationand sedimentationdevices . to minimize erosionor shall be extendedso as to dischargewithout eroding the natural channel. The storm- drain outletsare to be extended so as to discharge into a defined channel; the developershallcausethe dedication of any off- site easements necessary to accommodatethe extensionandprovide maintenance access as required by the Engineering Division. Theoutlet shall includea concreteheadwallwith wingwalls, a smooth concrete apron, and water-velocity-attenuation devices to minimizeerosion.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 294
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
16 June 23, 2005 60. Drainage systemsshall be designedand installed so that runoff collectedfrom roof drains and other improvementsare conveyeddirectlyto the street or other acceptabledrainage system with no lot- to- lot drainageallowed, unless approved by the CityEngineer. The minimum gradeof all lots, either toward the streetor open space, shall be 2 percent. 61. Project developmentshall incorporatestorm-waterquality prov/ sions set forth in the City' s Storm Water Quality Improvement Plan and the statewidegeneral permit ( Water Quality OrderNo. 2003- 0005- DWQ). Best Management Practices (BMPs) tailored to the project to maximizethe reduction of pollutant loading in
storm- waterrunoff shall be implemented to the maximumextent practicable.* 62. In compliancewith the requirementsof the State General ConstructionActivitySto~ xn Water Permit, the project developershall preparea site and construction- phase- specific Storm Water Pollution PreventJion Plan ( SWPPP) in conformancewith the CaliforniaStorm WaterQualityAssociationCortstructionHandbook. The SWPPPshall be subjectto the approvalof the CentralValleyRegionalWater Quality Control Board and incorporatedinto the projectimprovementplans. Bes't Management Practices ( BMPs) incorporatedinto the SWPPP shall be utilizedin all project-site developmentactivities. Waterquality controls will ensure no increasein turbidity, sediment, or other pollutant loads intoClover Creek or Chum Creek overpredevelopmentconditions and that storm- water discharges are in compliancewith all currentrequirementsof the Central ValleyRegional Water Quality Control Board. The developershall retaina licensed or certifiedengineeringor erosion-control professionalto prepare the SWPPP. A copy of the SWPPP shallbe providedto the City.*63. Storm-drain facilitieswithin both the on- site and off- site sectionsof ShastaView Driveshall be designed and constructedto accommodate the ultimate 4- lane street section. These facilitiesmay be a combination of surface and subsurfaceconveyancesystems as appropriateto meet City Standards. The
storm- drain system shall incorporatebiofiltration, utilizing the parkwaybetween the curb and right- of- way boundaryof ShastaViewDrive.BiologicalResources64. Thedeveloper shallacquire all necessary letters of approval and/ or permits from the DepartmentofFish and Game and the U. S. ArmyCorpsof Engineersfor altering or working withinany natural drainagecourse, jurisdictional waters of the United States, wetland, or riparian habitat prior to the commencementof gradingactivitiesand/ or constructionof any on- or off- site improvements, includingthe City-owned parcelto the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 295
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
17 June
23,
2005 65. 66. 67. Priorto issuanceof a gradingpermit, thedevelopershall prepare a Spill PreventionControland CountermeasurePlan to the City that includesstricton- site handlingrulesto prevent accidentalspills of hazardous materialsduring subdivisionimprovementconstruction (i. e., does not apply to house construction) into any water courses or other sensitive biologicalhabitatson- site. The objectiveof the plan will be to prevent concrete, paint, coating materials, petroleumproducts, or any othersubstancethat could be hazardousto aquatic life from contaminatingsoil or enteringa watercourseandidentifymeasures for
immediatecleanupof any accidentalspills.*Prior to the issuance of a grading permitor approvalof project improvementplans by the CityEngineer, the developershall securea U.

S. Army Corpsof Engineers (ACOE) 404 Permit for mitigationof developmentimpacts resultingin the loss of on- and off- site jurisdictionalwaters of the United States and federally protected species. The ipotentialimpactupon jurisdictionalwatersis estimatedto be approximately2. 809 acres. It is anticipatedthat the ACOE 404 Permitmay include any ( not necessarily all) of the followingelements and mitigationswith the objective of determining
the least environmentallydamaging practicableprojectalternative:*ao Section7 consultationwith the United States Fishand Wildlife Service (USFWS) in regard to the presence of federally protectedinvertebratespecies (vernal-
pool tadpoleshrimp) within an on- site vernal pool.Consultationwith the National MarineFisheries Service (NMFS) in regard to potentialdisturbanceof waters that may provide habitat
for a federallyprotectedfishspecies (Central ' Valley steelhead).Co Avoidanceof the 2 major vernal- pool featuresnear the south boundary of the project withinParcels " C" and " D" with appropriatesetbacksand maintenance of hydrology.do Purchase of creation credits in an ACOE-approvedmitigationbank. TheStillwater Plains mitigationbank is a local example of sucha facility.eo If mitigation- bank credits are
not available, payment of in- lieu fees to the ACOE.In- kind replacement/creation on-site. Purchaseof property containing wetlandswith transfer of ownershipto an- appropriateagency approved by ACOE (e. g., preservation credits). A raptor-nestingsurveyshall be conductedby a qualifiedbiologistprior to cleatingor earth- disturbanceactivitiesproposedto take place between March1 andJuly 31 of any year.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 296
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
18 June 23, 2005 68. Prior to gradingor constructionactivitiesin Clover Creek (e. g., constructionof ShastaView Drive, connectionto sewer trunk line), a Foothill Yellow-legged Frog nesting survey by a qualifiedbiologistshall be conducted in the area of disturbance. If frogsare observedor egg mass( es) found, appropriaterelocationmeasuresas recommended by
the biologistshall be implemented.*69. A minimum100-foot n. ondisturbancebuffershallbe established around any or all of the identifiedelderberrybusheslocatednear the west boundary of the projectsite Milchhave stemsmeasuring1 inch or more at groundlevel. The exact location of the bushes shall be identifiedon the projectgradingplan, and temporary fencingon the buffer boundaryshall be in placeduring consla:uction activities in the area. If constructionactivitiesareproposedwithin the buffer area, a ValleyElderberry LonghornBeetle survey shall be conducted by a qualifiedbiologistin accordance with U. S.

Fish and Wildlife Service ( USFWS) protocolsand the survey submittedto the USFWSfor. determination of necessarymitigation prior
to commencement
of the constructionactivity.* Fire Protection70. Residentialfire sprinklersystems, as approvedby the CityFireMarshal, shall be installedin all habitablestructuresin the subdivisionunlessanduntilCity Fire Station No. 7 is staffedwith additional personneland apparatusto adequatelyserve the projectas determinedby the Redding FireChief. Even with theupgrade of Fire Station No. 7, homeson the following lots
shall be providedwiith sprinklersystems:* ** ao Lotson cul- de-sacs or dead- end streets as a result of phasing which are more than 600feet from the street intersection; such lots shall be identifiedon the final map(s). boLots north of Street "M" unless and until a secondpublic-street access is providedto the developmentarea east of
Clover Creekfrom a point other than ShastaView Drive.71. A Vegetation Management/Fire Fuel ReductionPlan (Plan) shall be submittedin conjunctionwithproject improvement plans for each developmentphase and be subjectto approval by the City . Fire- MarshalandDevelopmentServicesDirector. The buildout objective of the Plan shall be to provide an adequatefire-safety bufferbetweenhomes and certain open-space areasthrough selective removal of 90 percent of
the brush and trees lessthan 3 inches in diameterin thefollowingareas:ao Within100 feet of the anticipatedhousesites on Lots 1 through31; Lots 38 through41; Lots 112 through117; Lots 332,
337, and 338; Lot 376; Lots 420 through 442; and

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 297
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
19 June
23,
2005

72. 73.

74. Parks,

75. 76. 77. 78. 79. The requiredfuel- reductionworkwill be accomplishedwiththe Clearing and gradingof the overallproject. The City recognizesthatthe Plan may haveto be modifiedfrom the above standard to meetother resource agency requirements for ground
disturbancenear sensitivebiological ' habitats. Priorto any vertical construction, a 20- foot- wide all- weather-surfaceroad shall be constructedand remain, serviceable to all developinglots and fire hydrants
installed withadequate fire flowsavailable
for fire- suppressionpurposes.Burning of constructiondebrisis prohibited.Brushpiles createdby projectdevelopmentshall be abated
prior to the fireseason.Open Space, and Tree PreservationWithrecordation of a final map for the first unitof development, the developershallmakean irrevocable offer of dedicationto the City in fee simpleabsolutefor a public parksite generallyas shownon the tentative map ( pursuantto Chapter17. 42 of the Redding MunicipalCode). The parksite shall be completelylocatedoutside the 100- yearfloodplainof CloverCreek. Thefinal sizeconfigurationand nameof the park siteshall be approvedby the CommunityServ:
ices Director
and in accordancewith the requirementsof the projectDevelopmentAgreement.The developer shallentcr into an agreementwith the City requiring the developer to fully improve the public park site and receive credittoward the subdivision's CityPark and RecreationFacilities Impact Feeobligation. The developershallbe responsible for the park design in coordinationwith the City' s CommunityServicesDepartment and securing of permits from agenciesother thanthe City necessaryfor construction. Park improvementsshall be completedin acc, ordance
with the requirementsandschedulecontainedin the project DevelopmentAgreement. Withrecordationof a final map( s), the developer shall dedicate to the City in fee simple absolutethe open- spacearea identified as Parcel " B" on the tentativemap. This area as a minimum- shall encompass- the 100- year floodplain, of Clover Creek as determinedby the.~CloverCreek Preserve FEMALetter of Map Revision. The land grant shallbe for the purposeof maintainingopenspaceandfloodplainsafety and for public trails and otheruses allowedby the City' s " OS" Open Spacezoning district. However, the dedication shall be in fee simple
absolute and no reversionaryinterest or condition subsequentshall be vested in permittee.Individual property lines shall extendthroughParcel "E"
and the areaidentifiedas privateopen-space easementson the final map( s). With recordationof a final map( s), Parcel "C" and Parcel "D" shall be either be placed in a private open- space easement(s) in a manner approved by the City, or protectionandpreservationotherwiseachievedin a mannerestablished APPROVED Packet Pg. 298
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
20 June23, 2005 0o All subdivisionlots and streets shallbe located outsideof and abovethe 100- year floodplainof Clover Creek and : meet the setback andeasement requirements of Chapter 18. 48 River/ CreekCorridor Developmentastheypertain to Clover Creek ( e. g., 25- foot setbackfrom riparianzone or 50-foot setback from top of bank, whicheveris greater). Adequateinformationto determinecompliancewith this condition
shall be provided with the projectimprovementplans.*81. The finishedfloor elewitionof all lots shall be a minimum of 1 foot above the 100- year floodplainelevationof Clover Creek. Compliancewith this requirementshall be determinedwith reviewof projectimprovement plans, exceptingLots 112 through117, 332, 337, and 338. For theselots, an as- built grading plan shall be submitted to the PlanningDivision after constructiondemonstratingcompliance, or elevation
certificatesshall be required with applicationfor a buildingpermit.**82. Preservationof existingtreeswitha diameter of 6 inches or more at 4. 5 feet abovethe ground (unless otherwisespecified) shall be incorporatedinto the projectin order to satisfythe purposes of Chapter 18. 45 Tree Preservationof the Redding
Municipal Code: a. Treeswithin Parcels " C," " D," and " E." bo Trees within the parkways
between the curb and right-of- way boundaryalongShasta ViewDrive.Co Selected trees
within the public parksite as determinedby the CommunityServices Department.d° Trees witha diameter of 12 inchesor greater withinthe rear- yardsetback of anylot where grading
is not necessaryto achieve the lot drainage requirements of the City Engineer.Grey pines meetingthe abovesize and location standardsfor preservationmay be removedupon a demonstration that they may currentlyor in the futurethreatena private or
public
improvement. Thetree- preservationplan shall be incorporatedinto the project improvement plans. · ........... ~ .....................................Archaeology83. If any archaeologyresottrces ( human skeletal remains, culturallymodifiedlithic materials,structuralfeatures, or historicartifacts) are encounteredduringground- disturbingactivities,all such activitiesshallbe haltedwithin a 55- yardradiusof the discovery, and a qualifiedarchaeologist shall be contacted
to
determinethe nature of the find, evaluate its significanceand, if necessary, recorranendappropriatemitigation.*Noise

84. APPROVED
Packet Pg. 299
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
21 June23, 200585. All homeson lots next to ShastaView Drive shall be providedwith air- conditioningsystemsto allow occupancy with doors
and windowsclosed. Air Quality 86. The followingStandardMitigation Measures (SMM) shall be implementedduringgrading and constructionactivitiesto control dust and PMl0 emissions:*a. Nontoxicsoil stabilizersshall be applied accordingto manufacturer's specificationto all inactive constructionareas (previouslygradedareas inactive
for 10 days or more).bo Reestablishgroumd cover on gradedand exposed portionsof the construction
site throughhydroseedingand mulching.Co All grading operationsshallbe suspended when winds (as instantaneousgusts)
exceed 20 miles per hour. Temporarytrafficcontrolas directedby the City Engineer shall be providedas appropriate duringall phases of constructionto improve traffic
flow ( e. g., flag person).eo Co. nstmctionactivitiesthat couldaffect traffic flow shall
be scheduled during off- peak hours.Active constructionareas, haulroads, etc., shall be watered at least twicedaily or
more as neededto limit dust. Exposed stockpiles of soil and other backfill materialshall eitherbe covered, watered, or have soil binders added to inhibitdust and wind erosion.ho All trucks haulingsoil and other loose material shallbe coveredor shouldmaintain at least2 feet of freeboard ( i. e., minimumvertical distancebetweentop of the load and the trailer) in. accordancewith the requirementsof CVC Section23114. Thisprovisionis enforced . bY l° c. a! ! aw enforcementagencies.All public roadwaysusedby the project contractorshall be maintainedfree fromdust, dirt, and debris causedby constructionactivities.

Streetsshallbe swelptat the end of the day if visible soil materialsare carried onto adjacentpublicpaved roads. Wheel washersshall be used where vehiclesenter and exit unpavedroadsonto paved roads, or trucks, and any equipmentshall be washed off
leavingthe sitewitheach trip. Open burningof c, leared vegetationshall be prohibited. Clearedvegetation shall be treatedby legal meansother than open burning, suchas chippingor grinding on- site, or transport to an appropriatereceiving facility. Such methodsshall be noted on improvementplans. At no timeshall open burning of materials generated

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 300
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
22 June
23, 2005 87. 88. The followingmitigation measuresshall be implemented during constructionof the subdivisionto reducetemporary Noxemissionsas recommendedby the Shasta County Air
Quality ManagementDistrict ( SCAQMD):*ao Theapplicantshallprovide a plan for approval by the SCAQMD, demonstratingthat off- road vehiclesand equipment with 50 or more horsepower to be used in constructionoft]he projectwill achievea project- wide fleet average20 percent Nox reduction and45 percent particulatereduction comparedto the most recent CaliforniaAir ResourcesBoardfleet average at the time of construction.bo The applicantshall submit to the SCAQMD a comprehensiveinventoryof all off- road constructionequipmentwith 50 or more horsepowerthat will be used an aggregateof 40 or more hours during any portionof the constructionproject. The inventoryshall include the horsepowerrating, engine-productionyear, and projectedhoursof use or fuel for each piece of equipment. The inventoryshall be updatedand submittedmonthlythroughoutthe durationof the project, exceptthat an inventoryshallnot be required for any 30- day period in which no constructionactivity occurs.c.

All construction equipmentshallbe properlytuned and maintained.Equipmentoperators shallbe
instructed to minimize equipment idling timeto 10 minutes. eo Existingpower sources instead
of temporarypower generatorsshall be utilized wheneverpossible. ThefollowingStandardLevel "A" MitigationMeasuresas identifiedin the City of ReddingAir QualityElement of the Genera! Plan shall be implementedto minimize overallair quality impacts as a result of buildout of the subdivision:*a° All homes shall be equippedwith
energy- efficientprocess systems for heatingequipment andwaterheaters.bo An electrical outletshallbe installed in the front
yard and backyardof all homes for electricalyard equipment.Co Any wood- bumin, g stoves
installedin a homeshall be EnvironmentalProtection Agency-Phase II certified.In addition to the above, the following
built- in projectelementsserve as mitigations
to minimize overallair qualityimpacts:d. Bus
stops along ShastaViewDrive. e. Provisionof bike

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 301
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
23 June 23, 2005 Miscellaneous89. A uniform6- foot- high, solid- woodfence or equivalent shall be constructedin conjunctionwith subdivisionimprovementsalong the rear property lines of Lots 338through376. Constructionanddesign detailsof the fence shall
be approved by the DevelopmentServices Director.90. Neighborhoodidentificationshall notduplicatethe nameof existingsubdivisionsin the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 302
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) June 23, 2005
Douglas DeMallie
Tentative Subdivision Map Application S-
7- 03 Planned Development
Application PD- 5-
04 Shastina RanchSubdivision
Draft Conditions
of APproval GeneralRequirementsConditions markedwith an asterisk are also environmentalmitigationmeasures.Conditionsmarked with a doubleasterisk are to be indicatedon the final mapas notes.Approvalis granted to develop . the
446- home ShastinaRanchSubdivision/PlannedDevelopment. The final map shallbe preparedand developmentcommencedin accordancewith the tentativemap and relatedplanneddevelopment plan as approvedby the City Council on The requirementsof these conditionsshall prevailin the eventthat there is anyinconsistencybetweena conditionand information or datapresentedon the tentative map or in the planned developmentplan. Implementationof these conditionsshallalso be in conformancewith the projectDevelopment Agreement. Thestandard conditionsfor subdivisionsdelineatedin Resolution 92- 18 shall be
met as markedon the attached fbrm.The developershall note that Section711. 4 of the StateFish and GameCode requires payment of a fee to the County Clerk for filing a Notice of. Determinationfor an environmentaldocument; paymentof this fee is the responsibilityof the projectproponent. In accordancewith Chapter 18. 40. 040 of the Zoning Code ( ComplianceWith Map Requirements), all conditionsapplicable to postsubdivision construction (as marked with a doubleasterisk **) shall be noted on the final map under a " Statementof Conditions" to provide notification to future property ownersof building
limitations andotherrequirementsfor thesubdivision.Acquisitionof all off- site : interestsin title or easements necessaryto satisfythe requirements of the subdivision approvalshall be the responsibilityof the developer. In the event the developeris unableto acq~uire such interests, the developermaypetition the City Council for adoptionof a resolution initiatingeminent domain proceedingsover the lands neededfor the off- site improvement's? The developer shall bear all costs for such
proceedings, includingattorneyfees, courtcosts, and land-value costs. o Prior to issuance of a grading or buildingpermit, the developershall secure approval of improvementplans for all public- street, utility, and drainage infrastructureand public park andtrail facilities from the City Engineer. Unlessotherwisenoted herein, all public- street, storm- drain, and utility improvementsrequired of the subdivisionshallcomplywith City PublicWorks Construction Standards
or
equivalentstandardsas approved
APPROVEDPacket Pg. 303
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
2 June
23, 2005 o 10. Thefollowingnotationshallbe placedon the final mapwithinstructions thatit be disclosedin the title reportissuedupon conveyanceof any lot/ home withinthe subdivision: "This subdivisionis located withinthe airport influence area of the Redding MunicipalAirport.Aircraft and helicopterflights will occurover the subdivision, and the numberof flights will increaseas aircraft
activityat the airportincreases."* ** At the time of recordationof a final map( s), the propertyowner shall grantthe City of Reddingan avigationeasementfor flight operationsof the ReddingMunicipal Airport. The form and contentof theeasementshall be approvedby the CityAttorney.* This conditionshall be recordedon the final map and noted in the title report. The escrowinstructionsfor the sale of eachlot shall require that thepurchaser and sellersign a statementthat they have readand understandthis conditionof sale.

The propertyowner(s) shallconsentto the formationof and participationin a landscape maintenancedistricttbr all:** Irrigation, landscape, and arterial fencingwithinthe public right-
of way of Shasta ViewDrive. Irrigation andlandscapewithin the public right- of- way of all internallocal
streets, includingparkways between the curb and gutter. Irrigation and landscapeassociatedwith pedestrian
connectionsbetween internalstreets and ShastaViewDrive. do Irrigation and landscapeassociated with the pedestrian
path betweenthe project and RanchoVista Way. eo All subdivision entrancefeatures
and monumentidentificationlocated
within the public right- of- way. f. Parkandtrailfacilities.

Storm- water detention facilities, including those
located within the public park.

Storm-water treatmentfacilitiesand erosion-control measures.Vegetationmanagement for fire- fuel reduction. Saiddistrictshall be formedin accordancewith the following: ao Prior to recordationof a final map, theproperty owner( s)
shall submita landscape maintenancedistrictpetitionand consent form, a landscape maintenanceagreementform, and applicableapplicationfees to the DevelopmentServicesDepartment. The district shall be formed and the landscape installed prior to issuance of a buildingpermitfor any structurewithin the subdivision. Formationof the district will obligate each lot owner withinthe subdivision to participatein the district.

A cost- escalationclausewill
APPROVED Packet Pg. 304
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
3 June 23, 2005 bo The landscapeand associatedirrigation systemfor the district shall be designedin accordance withthe specificationsavailable fi. om the DevelopmentServicesDepartment and installedin accordancewith the finalplansas approvedby the City. The landscapeand irrigation plansshall be submitted to the DevelopmentServicesDepartmentat the time the subdivision improvementplans are submitted to the EngineeringDivisionand are subjectto approvalpriorto recordation of a final map. Co Theirrigation systemshall be installedand acceptedby the City in conjunction with the public improvementswithin the subdivision; landscape improvementsshall be installedand acceptedby the Citypriorto issuanceof a building
permit within the subdivision.do The developershall be responsiblefor all costs and fees associated with the formation, installlation, andconnectionto City of Redding Electric and water utilities.Such fees include, but are not necessarilylimited to, formation costs, meter fees, connection charges, benefitfees, inspectionfees, and developmentfees. Thedeveloper shallalso be responsiblefor maintenanceof the landscapeand irrigationsystemuntil such timeas the districtis formed and fees are levied. The minimummaintenanceresponsibilityshallbe 90 days forplant materialand 1 year for the irrigationsystem from the dateimprovementsare accepted by the City. PlannedDevelopment
and Site DesignRequirements11. Developmentof the lots and project features/amenitiesshall be consistentwith the exhibits contained in the Shastina RanchPlanned Development Plan approved in conjunction
with the tentative subdivisionmap.** 12. Lot configurationand development shallcomplywith the requirementsof the zoning districtapplied to the propertyin. accordance withChapter18 ( Zoning Ordinance) of the Redding Municipal
Code with the followingexceptions:**ao The minimumlot width and size of certainlotson the east sideof CloverCreekmay be below the "RS-.3" Districtstandardof 70 feet and 7, 000 squarefeet, respectively,as
shown
on the tentative map. -"b. All comerlots shall havea minimumwidthof 65 feet at the street. The minimum front-yard setbackfor homeson Streets "J" through " T" may be 13 feet exceptgarages, which will havea
minimum setbackof 20 feet).13. Lots 1, 42, 43, 44, and 46 shall be adjusted, or additional land acquired, as necessary
to conformto project boundaries.14. The developmentofindusltrialParcel " A" shall meet therequirements of Section 18. 40. 020, Buffer Yards,

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 305
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
4 June
23, 200515. 16. Priorto recordationof a final map for the firstphase of development, a comprehensivefinal projectdevelopmentplanshallbe approved by the Development ServiceDirector. This
plan shall consist of: a. Anymodificationsor updates of the Planned DevelopmentPlan exhibits.b. Landscapeplan for all street and project-amenity landscaping.c.

Project- entrance and
identification sign features.d. Decorativestreetlights. e. ShastaView Drive wall
design.f. Park and trailfacilities.The developershall constructa public trail on both sidesof CloverCreekgenerally located as shownon the Planned DevelopmentPlan and tentativemap exhibits, includingsectionson the City propertyto the north. The sectionof trail on the east side of CloverCreekshallbe constructedprior to or in conjunctionwith construction of the adjacentpublic park improvements. The sectionof trail on the westside of CloverCreek shall be constructed withthe first phase of developmentof that area located between ShastaView Drive and CloverCreek. The structural sectionfor the trail and connectionsto the subdivisionshall comply with Cityof Red. dingConstructionStandard 111. 0 and be as follows: On the east side of Clover Creek, an 8- foot- wide asphalt section with 2- foot- wide compactedbaseslaouldersbetween ShastaView Driveto the south
and the west end of Street "P" to
the north. b. On the west side of Clover Creek:

An 8- foot-~ wide asphaltsectionwith 2- foot- wide compactedbase shouldersbetween ShastaView Drive to the south and the north
project boundaryata point convergingwith the sidewalk along ShastaView Drive.2) A 1 O- foot- wide asphaltsection with2- foot- wide compacted base shot~ lders on the Ci~' property to the north.

This sectionof trail shall incorporate
a drinkingfountain, benches, picnictables, trashreceptacles, and signageas specifiedby theCommunity ServicesDirector. All trail sectionswill be
designed to avoidremovalof, yet alsomeander in proximityto, significanttreesto the extent feasible.Internalconnectionsto the trail shallbe constructed at the west end of

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 306
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
5 June
23,
2005 Streets 17. 18. The developershall be responsiblefor securing of permits from agenciesother thanthe City necessaryto constructthe trail improvements.

The City recognizesthat some schedulin.g, alignment, or design modificationsmay be necessary
to securethese permits.f. The landand constructioncosts of the trail will not be credited towardthe project' s Park and RecreationFacilitiesImpactFee obligation, except for that sectionlocated
within the
publicpark. andCirculationA maximumof 49 lots tnay be recordedon each side of CloverCreek with a singleaccess providedby an extensionof Shasta View Drive fromeither Rancho Road or AirportRoad, generally on the alignment delineatedon the tentativemap. Upon recordation of the 50th lot on either side of Clover Creek, ShastaView Driveshall be constructedto connectRanchoRoad and Airport Road, : includingthe necessarycrossingat Clover Creek. As an alternativeto the 49- 1ot limiton the east side of CloverCreek, additional lots beyond 49 may be
recorded underthe following requirements: ao A temporary secondeastboundlane is constructed in Shasta View Drive betweenAirportRoad and Street "Q"; the secondlane shall be convertedto the landscape medianrequiredby other conditionsof the tentativemap approval at the time the Shasta View Drive connection between Airport Road
and RanchoRoad is completed.*bo No morethan 49 lots may be recordedpriorto constructionof Street " I," providinga secondaccess to the subdivision from ShastaViewDrive. c. None of the additionallots may be recorded north of Street "T." Shasta View Drive shallbe designedbased upon a 35 mile - per- hourdesignspeed, minimum centerlineradius of 800 feet, minimumtangentbetween reverse curvesof 100 feet, and meeting
sight distance standardsat all intersections.On- site, ShastaView Drive shall be constructedto thefollowingstandard:a. Whereproject developmentis adjacent to both of sidesShasta View
Drive: 1) Dedication of a 142- foot right- of- way.
2) A 16- foot- wide landscapemedian, two 12- foot- wide travel

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 307
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of ApprovalPage
6 June
23, 200520. Co 3) A 10- foot-
wide, 4- inch- thick meanderingconcretepedestrian/bicycle path and landscapeparkwaybetweenthe. curbandright- of- way boundary. The path shall be constructedat a location and elevationbased upon the ultimate wideningof Shasta ViewDrive to 4 lanes and be
separateda minimumof 10 feet fromthe ultimatecurb line. 4) Turn lanes at all intersectionsas definedin the Traffic Impact Study and as
specifiedby the City Engineer in conformancewithstandardengineering practice. 5) Arterial wall
and landscapeimprovementsrequired by other conditionsof this entit][ ement.Where Shasta View Driveis adjacentto designatedopen space, the right- of- waywidthmay be reduced to
127
feetand the parkwaywidthadjacent to the open space reducedaccordintgly.do A traffic circle at the intersectionof ShastaView Drive andStreet "D" with
necessary right- of- way and improvementsin accordancewith the specificationsof the CityEngineer.Additionalright- of- way will be dedicatedas specifiedby the City
Engineer to accommodatea future trafficcircle at the
intersectionof Shasta View Drive and Street " H." Off- site, ShastaView Drive shall
be improved as follows:On Assessors's Parcel
No. 054-510- 27 ( property immediatelywest of Lots 102
through112): 1) Dedicationof 100 feet of right- of way. 2) A 16- foot- wide landscapemedian, two
12- foot-widetravel lanes, 6- foot- wide paved
shoulderssymmetricalto the ultimatecenterline, and vertical curb and gutteron the project sideof the street.3) A 1 O- foot-
wide, 4- inch- thick meanderingconcretepedestrian/bicycle path and landscapeparkwaybetween the curband right- of- way boundary. The
path shall be constructedat a locationand elevationbaseduponthe ultimate wideningof ShastaView Drive
to 4 lanes and be separateda minimumof

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 308
Attachment: Previous Staff Report 082024 (4.11(e)--Project Acceptance, Shastina Ranch, Unit 8) S- 7- 03
and PD- 5- 04
Draft Conditions
of Approval

Page 7 ends
← All documents from this meeting