Redding City Council
January 20, 2026

Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 will be completely replaced and relocated upriver because it has reached the end of its service life, its current location is in a shallow portion of the river that significantly limits its capacity during low river levels, and its capacity will not meet expected future demands. For additional background and details concerning the project, please refer to the previous staff reports attached.

On September 19, 2023, and March 21, 2024, the Council approved the City as an applicant for four grants and two loans associated with the project, including grants administered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS), the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, as well as loans administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. A summary of the grant and loan applications Council has approved to date, including the subject FRGP grant, are provided in Table 1.

Table 1- Grant/Loan Project Funding Summary
Grant/Loan Program
Funding
Type
Council
Approval
Request
Limit
City Cost
Share1 Status
USFWS- National Fish
Passage Program Grant 9/19/23 $2 M $0.6 M Submitted Pre-App. Not Selected.

WCB - Stream Flow
Enhancement Program Grant 9/19/23 $5 M $1.5 M Submitted Pre-App. Awaiting response.

NMFS - Transformational
Habitat Restoration and
Coastal Resilience Program
Grant 9/19/23 $25 M $1.5 M Preparing
Application.

SWRCB - State Revolving
Fund Loan 9/19/23 $40 M
$0 or
Low
Interest
Submitted app.

Awaiting response.

Water Infrastructure Finance
&
Innovation Act
Loan 3/21/24 $25 M Low
Interest
Finalizing
application.

U.S. Department of
Transportation Federal
Highway Administration
Culvert Aquatic Organism
Passage
Grant 3/21/24 $6 M $1.2 M Submitted app.

Awaiting response.

Sub Total (Council Approved to Date): $103 M $4.8 M
CDFW - FRGP Grant Pending $6 M $0
Total: $109 M $4.8 M

1. City cost share shown does not include potential fees or interest associated with loans

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council March 25, 2025
Re: 4.11(e)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grant to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
All of the grant and loan programs listed above are competitive and it is unknown at this point which programs will award funds for the project or how much will be awarded. Given the uncertainty of funding that will be received, the long timelines often associated with the review and award process for grants, and to ensure that adequate funding is secured to construct the project on schedule, staff intends to continue to seek and apply for funding opportunities, that could benefit the project and reduce costs to the Utility.

The FRGP is a competitive grant program that has $17 million available this cycle for projects that restore, enhance, or protect anadromous salmonid habitat in watersheds of California. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project, further described in the May 13, 2024 staff report, meets the FRGP selection criteria and the project should be a good candidate for receiving funding through this grant program.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The design and technical studies will provide the information necessary to ensure environmental compliance as the project progresses.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report- 09-19-2023
Previous Staff Report- 05-21-2024

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 339
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Approve the City of Redding (City) as applicant for a Service National Fish Passage Program Base Funding Grant, administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, requesting up to $2 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (2) Approve the City as applicant for a Water Supply for Environmental Flows (Stream Flow Enhancement Program) Grant, administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board requesting up to $5 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (3) Approve the City as applicant for a Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant, under Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act, administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, requesting up to $25 million with up to a 30 percent local match;
(4) Approve the City as applicant for a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund grant, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting up to $40 million with no local match;
(5) Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application to the State Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Fund for the project and authorizing the Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director to sign and file necessary applications and amendments thereto on behalf of the City of Redding; and (6) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the above grants, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant(s) be awarded.

Fiscal Impact
The total Pump House 1 Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $40 million.

Project costs in excess of grant funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
with the grants will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The proposed grant programs do not require a local match, but applicants who offer some local match will typically be scored and ranked higher by the administering agencies and have a higher likelihood of receiving grant funding.

The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program and it has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and accumulated a balance of approximately $16.5 million.

City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under one or all of these grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.

PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component of the City’s water supply system.

PS01 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 29 million gallons-per-day. Staff plans to completely replace PS01 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its pumping capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District dam, which is downriver;
• The existing intake and screens may not meet long-term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species;
• Pumping capacity will need to be increased to meet the future demands of the FWTP; and • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during an earthquake.

On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized execution of a Consulting and Professional Services Contract (C-8541) with Jacobs to perform an evaluation of project alternatives and prepare a Preliminary Design Report for replacement of PS01. Based on recommendations in the Preliminary Design Report, the City has elected to proceed with a project alternative to replace and relocate PS01 at a new river trail location, approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing station.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
The new PS01 location is in a deeper area within the Sacramento River that will allow for better operations and reliability. The new location is also adjacent to Jenny Creek, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek in the area, a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will be required to perform, at some point. The creek restoration work will include removal of two existing culverts and restoration to an open channel. The culverts are currently preventing passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead into Jenny Creek. The restoration work will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the project.

On March 7, 2023, the Council authorized execution of an amendment to Jacobs’ contract for the second phase of professional consultant services associated with the project, including environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the selected project alternative. Under its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying these grant opportunities and will continue to assist the City with applications for the grants, if approved by the Council.

The National Fish Passage Program (NFPP) grant program provides direct technical and financial assistance to remove instream barriers and restore aquatic organism passage and aquatic connectivity for the benefit of Federal trust resources. It aims to maintain or increase fish populations to improve ecosystem resiliency, provide quality fishing experiences, support the modernization of infrastructure, and contribute to enhanced community resilience to the impacts from climate change and other public safety hazards. NFPP funds a variety of project types including, but not limited to, dam removals, culvert replacements, floodplain restoration, and the installation of fishways. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project makes it a good candidate to potentially receive grant funding from this program.

The Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) was created by statute in 1947 to conserve California’s wildlife resources and provide for public recreation. WCB awards grants for fish and wildlife habitat conservation, restoration, and for development of compatible public access facilities. Its Stream Flow Enhancement Grant Program also presents a funding opportunity for the project with the Jenny Creek restoration work included.

The Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant program aim is to support transformational habitat restoration projects that restore marine, estuarine, or coastal ecosystems, using approaches that enhance community and ecosystem resilience to climate hazards. It prioritizes funding for habitat restoration actions that demonstrate significant impacts, rebuild productive and sustainable fisheries, contribute to the recovery and conservation of threatened and endangered species, promote climate-resilient ecosystems, especially in tribal, indigenous, and/or underserved communities, and improve economic vitality. The project should be a good candidate for funding from this program because of the included Jenny Creek restoration work.

State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) provides drinking water State Revolving Fund (SRF) funds for a wide range of drinking water infrastructure projects, including projects for treatment, transmission, distribution, source, storage, consolidation, and creation of new systems.

City staff and Jacobs are confirming that the City will meet disadvantaged community requirements for loan forgiveness (grants) for this project. The City intends to apply for these grant funds to supplement design and construction costs associated with the Pump Station 1

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
replacement. Prior to any SRF application submittal, an authorizing resolution is required. Staff has prepared the attached resolution for the Council’s consideration. The application resolution also provides SWRCB staff with the assurance the City is committed to the project. The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The design and technical studies will provide the information necessary to ensure environmental compliance as the project progresses.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING DESIGNATED CITY OFFICIALS TO FILE AN

APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A FINANCIAL

AGREEMENT FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL

BOARD TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND THOSE FUNDS IF THE

APPLICATION IS GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City of Redding (the “City) desires to apply for grant funding for its Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the City intends to finance the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project with monies (the “Project Funds”) provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (the “State Water Board”); and WHEREAS, the State Water Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the sale of obligations, the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the “Obligations”); and
WHEREAS, prior to either the issuance of Obligations or the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds, the City desires to incur certain capital expenditures (the “Expenditures”) with respect to the Project from available monies of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that those monies to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the City for the Expenditures from the proceeds of the Obligations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

1. The Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director (the “Authorized Representative”), or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of, the City of Redding, a Financial Assistance Application for the financing agreement from the State Water Board for the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project.

2. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to provide the assurances, certifications, and commitments required for the financial assistance application, including executing a financial assistance agreement from the State Water resources Control Board and any amendments or changes thereto.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

3. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to represent the City of Redding in carrying out the City’s responsibilities under the financing agreement, including certifying disbursement requests on behalf of the City of Redding and compliance with applicable state and federal laws.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of September, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
__________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 346
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 5094, to provide engineering services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Award to Jacobs;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Consultant and Professional Services Contract with Jacobs for Phase 1 (preliminary design) of the project, including project management, data review, geotechnical investigations, survey/mapping, preliminary environmental review, construction financing evaluation, and preparation of a preliminary design report for replacement of Pump House 1 for a not-to-exceed fee of $488,829; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $150,000.

Fiscal Impact
The total project costs are expected to be roughly $30 million. Funding for this project will come from the Water Utility Fund and the project is included in the current Capital Improvement Program. The City of Redding (City) plans to obtain State or Federal loans and/or grants, with the design consultant’s assistance, to fund a portion of the construction costs for the project.

Should funding from loans or grants not materialize, the City may need to issue municipal bonds.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the contract for Phase 1 preliminary design services for the project. This alternative will delay or eliminate the construction of the Pump House 1 Replacement Project subjecting the City’s water system to significant vulnerabilities and potential regulatory action.

MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 2 Background
The City’s water system includes two water treatment plants, approximately 555 miles of conveyance and distribution pipelines, 17 groundwater wells, 10 pump stations, and 12 reservoirs providing a total of 33.5 million gallons of storage. The City’s Pump House 1 (PH1) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately 1/4 mile upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP), its largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands. PH1 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, making it a very critical component of the City’s water supply chain.

PH1 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (MGD).

In 2002, a feasibility study entitled “Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project” (Feasibility Study) was prepared for the City by CH2M Hill (now Jacobs). Available funding was insufficient at that time to construct a new pumping facility or even to complete many of the recommended modifications. Therefore, the City was directed by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries to pursue an interim retrofit solution for fish screening, which was installed at PH1 in 2006. However, the retrofitted screens depart from standard criteria under certain river and operating conditions and as such are not a long term solution.

City staff plans to completely replace PH1 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) dam downriver. • The existing intake and screens may not meet long term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species.
• Its capacity will need to be increased to meet the future capacity of the FWTP. • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during a design earthquake.

City staff will consider four project alternatives, or combinations thereof, for replacement of Pump House 1, including:
• Replacement at the existing Pump House 1 location;
• Replacement at a new river trail location, approximately 2,000 feet upriver; • Replacement at the Keswick Reservoir; and
• Replacement with a riverbank filtration collector well system.

Design services for the PH1 replacement will be broken into two phases. Phase 1 of the design is included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will include preliminary design services for evaluation of the project alternatives, and preparation of a preliminary design report to allow the City to determine the appropriate project alternative to pursue.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 3 Phase 2 of the design is not included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, preparation of contract documents, and design services during the bid and construction periods for the selected project alternative. If the City is satisfied with Jacobs’ services at the completion of Phase 1 (expected spring of 2021), then staff intends to recommend at that time that the Council authorize negotiation for an amendment with Jacobs to add Phase 2 design services to the Contract.

Otherwise, a separate RFP will be required for Phase 2 engineering services.

CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
A review and selection panel was formed with five members from the Public Works Water and Engineering Divisions. The panel’s evaluation was based on consultants’ ability and qualifications to perform all phases of the engineering services that will be required, including both Phases 1 and 2.

Four proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received on January 24, 2020.

The panel members evaluated and scored each proposal based on consultants’ understanding of the project/scope, project approach, experience with fish screens, experience with riverbank filtration collector wells, qualifications of the project team and manager, familiarity with City projects and required procedures, ability to complete projects on-time and within budget, and the proposed teams’ location. After reviewing the proposals, the panel elected to interview all four of the firms that proposed.

Oral interviews were held on March 12, 2020, at City Hall. Each consultant team was allowed 55 minutes to provide a presentation and answer the City’s questions. The questions asked were the same for all consultant teams and were not provided to any team until they arrived for the interview; at which time, each participant was provided the questions in writing. Review Panel members evaluated and scored each consultant team based on their presentation and responses to the questions.

After the oral interviews, the review panel:
• Combined scores from the consultants’ proposals and oral interview to determine their overall score;
• Ranked consultants based on their overall score; and
• After ranking, opened consultant’s sealed fee envelopes.

The panel ranked the firms as follows:

Rank Firm Fee
1 Jacobs $488,829
2 Black & Veatch $576,210
3 West Yost $997,956
4 Stantech $1,160,516
Applying the evaluation criteria to the proposals and oral interview scoring, it is the opinion of the selection panel that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required services. This opinion is in part based on Jacobs’:
• Excellent fish screen and riverbank collector well design experience and qualifications; • Environmental and compliance team has a proven track record with similar projects;

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 4 • Design experience in the Sacramento River near the project area; • Creative design approach and ideas presented in their oral interview; and • Local team.

Replacement of Pump House 1 has been included in the City’s Water Master Plan for several years and is a necessary and critical improvement for the City’s water supply chain. Staff believes that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required design services and recommends that the Council authorize recommendations listed herein, including award to Jacobs’ for an amount not-to-exceed $488,829.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Agreement (available online)
Location Map

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 1 Rev. 02/17

CITY OF REDDING

CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (“Consultant”) for the purpose of City of Redding Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1-Preliminary Design).

WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:

SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.

SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred TwentyNine Dollars ($488,829). This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be itemized to reflect the employees performing the requested tasks, the billing rate for each employee and the hours worked.

C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.

D. Pursuant to Section 1781 of the Labor Code, Consultant is advised that the work contemplated in Exhibit A, Task 2.2 and 2.3 of this contract is subject to the payment of prevailing wages and all other requirements of the Prevailing Wage Law. The prevailing wage of each job classification may be found by inquiry with the California Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall comply with all laws related to the performance of public work including, but not limited to, the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 2 Rev. 02/17
employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Section 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.

E. No Consultant or subconsultant may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. No Consultant or subconsultant may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. All Consultants and subconsultants must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. This requirement applies to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing. Consultant is further advised that the work contemplated herein is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about May 11, 2020, and complete said work no later than December 31, 2021. Time is of the essence.

B. If Consultant fails to perform its duties to the satisfaction of City, or if consultant fails to fulfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Contract, then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon City giving written notice thereof to Consultant.

C. Either Party may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the term set forth in Section 3.A. of this Contract exceeds ninety (90) calendar days in duration, Consultant’s sole right to terminate shall be limited to termination for cause.

D. Consultant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City’s funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the project and/or work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of its intention to terminate. In the event of a termination pursuant to this subdivision, Consultant shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 3 Rev. 02/17
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.

F. In the event that City terminates the Contract, City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Contract; provided, however, that City shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits which might have been made by Consultant had Consultant completed the services required by this Contract. Consultant shall, not later than ten (10) calendar days after termination of this Contract by City, furnish to City such financial information as in the judgment of the City’s representative is necessary to determine the reasonable value of the services rendered by Consultant.

G. In no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party’s failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.

SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT A. City shall make its facilities accessible to Consultant as required for Consultant’s performance of its services under this Contract, and, upon request of Consultant, provide labor and safety equipment as required by Consultant for such access.

B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.

C. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Contract any licenses, permits and approvals that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.

D. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Contract, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Contract is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/employee relationship, association, joint venture relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs under this Contract. Any and all taxes imposed on Consultant’s income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Contract or its performance, including but not limited to sales or use taxes, shall be paid by Consultant. Consultant shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Consultant is an employee of City. Consultant shall not

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 4 Rev. 02/17
be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.

E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.

F. No portion of the work or services to be performed under this Contract shall be assigned, transferred, conveyed or subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant may use the services of independent contractors and subcontractors to perform a portion of its obligations under this Contract with the prior written approval of City. Independent contractors and subcontractors shall be provided with a copy of this Contract and Consultant shall have an affirmative duty to assure that said independent contractors and subcontractors comply with the same and agree to be bound by its terms. Consultant shall be the responsible party with respect to all actions of its independent contractors and subcontractors, and shall obtain such insurance and indemnity provisions from its contractors and subcontractors as City’s Risk Manager shall determine to be necessary.

G. Consultant, at such times and in such form as City may require, shall furnish City with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Contract, the costs or obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Contract.

H. Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by City to assure proper accounting for all project funds. These records shall be made available for audit purposes to state and federal authorities, or any authorized representative of City.

Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.

I. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Contract in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of Consultant’s profession. All products of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Contract shall be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing the profession of Consultant and its agents, employees and subcontractors assigned to perform the services contemplated by this Contract.

J. All completed reports and other data or documents, or computer media including diskettes, and other materials provided or prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Contract are the property of City, and may be used by City. City shall have all intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, copyright and patent rights, in said documents, computer media, and other materials provided by Consultant. City shall release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, costs,

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 5 Rev. 02/17
expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.

K. Consultant, including its employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Contract. Consultant shall comply with all requirements of the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 8100 et seq.) and other laws relating to conflicts of interest, including the following: 1) Consultant shall not make or participate in a decision made by City if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision may have a material effect on Consultant’s economic interest, and 2) if required by the City Attorney, Consultant shall file financial disclosure forms with the City Clerk.

SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:

Coverage Required Not Required
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability X
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) X
(Place an “x” in the appropriate box)
B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office form number CG-0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;

2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;

3. Statutory Workers’ Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers’ Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 6 Rev. 02/17

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.

5. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording “but only in the event of a named insured’s sole negligence” or any other verbiage limiting the insured’s insurance responsibility.

C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant; premises owned, leased or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant.

The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

2. The insurance coverage of Consultant shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Consultant shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Consultant agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice has been given to City.

E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.

F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 7 Rev. 02/17
insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.

G. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant as required by Section 5 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Consultant pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.

H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a “claims made” policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945.6, Consultant shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination of this Contract.

I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall immediately notify City’s Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225-4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Consultant shall submit a written report to City’s Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Consultant’s insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.

SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2782.8, when the services to be provided under this Contract are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under Section 2782.8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 8 Rev. 02/17
B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

C. The Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s inability to evaluate liability. The Consultant shall respond within thirty (30) calendar days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City.

If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered to City within thirty (30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Consultant herein.

D. The obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.

E. City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Consultant pursuant to this Section to represent City’s interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.

SECTION 7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES A. This Contract shall be deemed to have been entered into in Redding, California. All questions regarding the validity, interpretation or performance of any of its terms or of any rights or obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be governed by California law. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 9 Rev. 02/17
parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.

C. No covenant or condition to be performed by Consultant under this Contract can be waived except by the written consent of City. Forbearance or indulgence by City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of the covenant or condition in question. Until performance by Consultant of said covenant or condition is complete, City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to City under this Contract or by law or in equity despite said forbearance or indulgence.

D. If any portion of this Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.

E. The headings in this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof. A waiver of any party of any provision or a breach of this Contract must be provided in writing, and shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provisions herein.

F. Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Contract, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares and represents that this Contract is made without reliance upon any statement or representation not contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Contract and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Contract is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code § 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.

G. Each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.

H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 10 Rev. 02/17
and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.

SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.

SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.

B. In the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.

SECTION 10. REPRESENTATIVES
A. City’s representative for this Contract is Kurt Maire, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 225-4081, fax number (530) 245-7024. All of Consultant’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person, or to the representative's designee.

B. Consultant’s representative for this Contract is Kim Hein, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 355-8488. All of City’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person.

C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.

SECTION 11. NOTICES
A. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be deemed given only if in writing signed by an authorized representative of the sender (may be other than the representatives referred to in Section 10) and delivered by facsimile,

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 11 Rev. 02/17
with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:

To City:

City of Redding – Engineering
Mr. Kurt Maire, P.E.
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Mrs. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
B. Either party may change its address for the purposes of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.

C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.

SECTION 12. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT
A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective parties to this Contract; that they have full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Contract; and that the execution, performance and delivery of this Contract by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Contract.

B. When the Mayor is signatory to this Contract, the City Manager and/or the Department Director having direct responsibility for managing the services provided herein shall have authority to execute any amendment to this Contract which does not increase the amount of compensation allowable to Consultant or otherwise substantially change the scope of the services provided herein.

SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) 2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
United States
T +1.530.243.5831
F +1.530.243.1654
www.jacobs.com
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

PPS0402201345RDD 1
Exhibit A
April 14, 2020
Attention: Josh Watkins, Water Manager
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1 – Preliminary Design)
Dear Mr. Watkins:

This letter presents Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.’s (JACOBS) proposed Scope of Engineering Services (Exhibit A) for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project - Phase 1 Preliminary Design (Project). We are proposing to perform the work under the City of Redding Consulting and Professional Services Agreement on a not-toexceed time and materials basis per the rate schedule (Exhibit B).

Per Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 5094, the effort associated with this Project will require two separate phases.

Phase 1 will involve preliminary design (alternatives evaluation) services and preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) with recommendations. Phase 2 will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, and preparation of contract documents, as well as design services during the bid and construction periods for replacement of Pump House 1 (PS1)and installation of a new raw water pipeline, as required. The City will issue a contract for Phase 1. If the City is satisfied with the PDR and the JACOBS services to that point, the City intends to provide JACOBS a contract amendment to work on Phase 2.

Project Introduction
The City of Redding (City) PS1 supplies approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (mgd) of Sacramento River water to the Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP) through two 30-inch-diameter pipelines. It is the primary delivery source and a critical component for the FWTP. PS1 is currently located on the right bank (looking downstream) of the Sacramento River along the Sacramento River Trail approximately 0.25 miles upstream of the Diestelhorst Bridge.

PS1 is scheduled for replacement based primarily on the following:
▪ Current location is within significant habitat for endangered winter-run salmon and the current screening is not optimal for species protection and does not meet state and federal fishery criteria. ▪ Limited intake capacity during low river stages due to shallow river depth during times when the AndersonCottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) diversion dam flashboards are not in place. This situation makes the City dependent on ACID operations at the diversion dam, which typically has flashboards installed only from April to November.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 2
▪ The City’s General Plan identified PS1 as being located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and recommended that the structure be evaluated for its ability to withstand damage during a design earthquake.
▪ Proposed FWTP expansion up to a capacity of 42 mgd per the City’s Water Master Plan. ▪ Limited workspace for maintenance around the pumping units and other equipment.

The objective of Phase 1 Preliminary Design is to provide review of alternatives, sufficient engineering, major design elements, economic information, and screening the alternatives so the City can decide how to proceed with implementation of the Project. Alternatives, including combinations thereof, will be selected in a collaborative process with the City to be evaluated during Phase 1 and include the following:
▪ Alternative 1 – Existing Pump Station 1 Location
▪ Alternative 2 – New River Trail Location
▪ Alternative 4 – Keswick Reservoir Location
▪ Alternative 5 – Riverbank Filtration Collector Well System Scope of Engineering Services
The scope of engineering services to provide for the Project definition phase are outlined by tasks below:

Task 1 – Project Management, Meetings, and Quality Control Subtask 1.1 – Project Management
The purpose of this subtask is to provide for the initiation and overall management of Project activities. An overall schedule and work plan will be developed and implemented so that work activities are completed in an integrated and timely manner. In addition, this task includes those elements necessary to manage, lead, and control the Project.

JACOBS will furnish project management services for the Project, as follows:
▪ Status Reporting – Monitor budget, progress, and schedule. Monitor work efforts and evaluate actual versus planned progress. Changes in scope will be communicated to the City. Provide verbal progress reports to the City’s project manager as necessary.
▪ Administration – Maintain Project records, manage and process Project communications, and coordinate Project administrative matters. Prepare monthly invoices and Project status reports. ▪ Coordination – Coordinate tasks/subtasks and staff, including coordination with the City, to complete authorized work on schedule and within budget.

JACOBS will manage the health, safety, and environmental activities of its staff. JACOBS will prepare a projectspecific Health and Safety Plan. JACOBS will address safety in the office and during site visits. JACOBS is not responsible for the health and safety of other project participants.

Deliverables: Monthly invoices with status reports.

Subtask 1.2 – Meetings
The purpose of this subtask is to provide coordination of Project activities.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 3
JACOBS will conduct meetings for the Project as follows:
▪ Kickoff meeting with City of Redding at City Hall to reinforce key project objectives, critical milestones, budget, critical success factors, and team roles and responsibilities (assume 4 hours with Project Manager, Design Manager, and four key design team members).
▪ Up to 12 monthly status conference calls or meetings at City Hall between City and JACOBS. JACOBS will prepare monthly agendas and summary minutes, including ongoing work, issues pending, action items, and status of open action items.
▪ One (1) Alternatives Analysis Workshop with the City (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting Leads).
▪ One (1) Preliminary Design Workshop with City and state/federal agencies (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting leads).

Deliverables: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.

Subtask 1.3 – Quality Control
The purpose of this subtask is to provide quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) for the Project. Upon completion of the Draft and Pre-Final PDR phases, senior members of the JACOBS team will review design and construction methodology, drawings, calculations, Project design report, and the overall integrity of the design.

Internal reviews by senior engineers using quality review forms (QRFs) will be performed on Draft and Pre-Final PDR deliverables.

Comments received from the quality control reviewers will be reviewed and adjudicated by the design team, with changes and additions incorporated into the design documents prior to delivery to the City.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Task 2 – Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Subtask 2.1 Data Review
JACOBS will review available data, reports, mapping, and geotechnical reports. The following information may include, but not limited to:
▪ CH2M HILL (now JACOBS) prepared the Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project in February 2002.
▪ Record Documents: JACOBS will review available record documents, including record drawings, technical specifications, design reports, and geotechnical data reports. ▪ Federal, State, and Local Requirements: JACOBS will determine, with assistance from the City, regulatory requirements applicable for the Project. JACOBS will research and document restrictions as they pertain to the proposed Project alternatives.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 4
Subtask 2.2 Geotechnical Investigations
JACOBS will perform geotechnical and geophysical investigations necessary to provide sufficient data for Phase 1.

Geophysical refraction surveys will be performed to provide profiles with well-contrasted changes in seismic velocity that facilitates interpretation of subsurface stratigraphy. The seismic velocity of the rock will evaluate the feasibility of excavation, or excavatability, of the rock and feasibility of driving sheet piles for scour protection and cofferdam construction.

One geophysical refraction survey line is proposed for each Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 (two lines total), but no survey lines will be provided for either Alternative 4 or Alternative 5. The survey reveals subsurface strata to the anticipated excavation depth. Following the completion of the geophysical survey, up to two soil borings will be drilled adjacent to the river trail at the location of the proposed pump station.

The potential for liquefaction will be evaluated from the borehole data, as liquefaction mitigation would significantly contribute to the cost of the alternative. Samples are tested in the laboratory to evaluate their consistency and properties.

Up to two soil borings total will first be drilled at two potential collector well sites. The sites are identified as Area 4 in the 1972 report to the City by Ranney, and an area on the south side of the river near the ACID Fish Screen.

If the soil borings find adequate sands and gravels are present for a potential collector well and the City approves the pumping well site, up to one 12-inch-diameter pumping well will be completed.

Three observation wells would be installed at approximate radial distances between 30 to 150 feet from the pumping/test well at a location approved by the City. These wells would be used to monitor how the water table responds to pumping from the test well. Following development of all the wells, the test well would be pumped for a minimum of 24 hours while observing the response in the monitoring wells. The results of the pumping test will be used to estimate the hydraulic capacity of the proposed collector well site.

Assumptions: The soil boring drilling and geophysical surveys are performed during the course of one working day at each location. The well installation development and testing would be completed during approximately 2 weeks at each location. It is assumed that site access is provided for the geophysical crew and drill rigs. It is assumed that no permits will be needed to perform the geophysical survey. Well permits will be obtained through Shasta County. The geophysical survey and drilling crews will work under the supervision of JACOBS.

Assume that City encroachment permits will be required for borings and City will waive the encroachment permit fees.

Deliverables: A geotechnical data report will be prepared to summarize the field investigation and testing results.

The geologic hazards associated with each alternative will be discussed and a determination will be made of the potential for a future collector well at up to two sites. A geotechnical data report will be incorporated in the PDR.

Subtask 2.3 Surveying and Mapping
Ground surface surveys, both on bank and on the river bottom, will be performed as necessary to complete the preliminary design for Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. Two cross-sections perpendicular to the river will be surveyed at both the Alternatives 1 and 2 sites to determine preliminary facility elevations. Assumes two people

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 5
for one day in the field for this task. No surveying and mapping are included herein for Alternatives 4 and 5 because this information is not required for Phase 1 evaluations.

JACOBS will perform a preliminary right-of-way assessment and identify potential right-of-way issues based on readily available GIS data. Right-of-way surveys will be performed in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Task 3 – Preliminary Environmental Review
The purpose of this task is to evaluate the environmental viability and issues related to each proposed alternative. JACOBS will perform a screening-level review of the biological and cultural impact potential for each site based upon readily available data and technical experience in the Project area. This includes for each site:
▪ One-day reconnaissance level site visit with California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and Biogeographic Information and Observation System Database (BIOS) data reviews for any potential endangered or listed species within each Project.
▪ Identification of the likely Area of Potential Effect (APE) and initial review by a JACOBS archaeologist and cultural resources specialist. California Historical Resource Information System (CHRIS) surveys will likely only be completed for the selected alternative in Phase 2. ▪ Review of water rights and evaluation for change in point-of-diversion. ▪ Preliminary delineation of the Ordinary High-Water Mark (OWHM) is performed for an engineering alternatives review. Detailed wetland delineation and permitting is completed in Phase 2 once the Project is defined.
▪ Coordination with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine the preliminary feasibility of each selected alternative.
▪ Gather information related to existing river bank collector well systems adjacent to anadromous waterways in northern California and analyze their permitting and regulatory challenges.

Assumptions:
▪ Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) document will not be completed in Phase

1. LEDPA analysis will be included in Phase 2 if individual permit cannot be avoided from USACE. ▪ California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance is considered for each alternative with assumptions. CEQA and NEPA documents are included in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 4 – Construction Funding Evaluation
The purpose of this task is to provide a list of viable funding alternatives like California State Revolving Fund (SRF) and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) for the project construction and rank them based on likelihood of successful application, associated interest rates, terms, design or construction related requirements, potential impacts to the project schedule, related reporting or monitoring requirements, and other important aspects associated with each funding alternative.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 6
Assumptions:
▪ Up to four funding mechanisms are reviewed and ranked in the PDR. ▪ Applications for funding submission are not included in Phase 1.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report
The purpose of this task is to provide the City of Redding with a PDR with the preferred alternative for the City to consider for Phase 2 Final Design.

JACOBS will follow a three-phase process for delivery of the preliminary design for the Project. This process includes producing preliminary deliverables at three phases of the design (Draft, Pre-Final, and Final Preliminary Design). At the Draft and Pre-Final phases, JACOBS will provide information for review and provide for resolution of key issues before proceeding to the next phase. The information collected, and the concepts defined in each consecutive phase, will form the basis for subsequent work.

Each phase will include specific deliverables, which are identified in the following subtasks. Design review workshops (at City Hall) with the City of Redding will be conducted at critical design milestones as identified in the following subtasks. The City of Redding will provide comments to JACOBS within 3 weeks of receiving the documents.

Project Design Criteria
The Project design criteria will be developed for evaluating the alternatives and will be included in the PDRs.

Engineering design criteria will address resource agency criteria, structural, civil, geotechnical, mechanical, electrical, conveyance pipeline, cost and financial analysis, and construction elements. Operations criteria will encompass diversion requirements and other operations to maintain water deliveries during construction.

Development and Evaluation of Alternatives and Components Alternatives will be developed in concert with the City. JACOBS anticipates up to four alternatives will be evaluated per the project design criteria. JACOBS will prepare information associated with each alternative to provide information for a project workshop with the City and agencies to ensure consensus of alternatives.

JACOBS will evaluate design criteria and prepare conceptual design documents for the alternatives and components. Conceptual design documents will include approximately three drawings per alternative: site plan, facility layout plan, cross sections, river and screen criteria, construction phasing approach, operations and maintenance (O&M), construction cost estimates, and life-cycle cost will be included in the PDRs.

JACOBS will provide a clearly defined ranking system and rank the four alternatives based on performance, capital and operating costs, environmental impacts, and other factors that should be considered.

Subtask 5.1 – Draft Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report to document the information prepared to select the preferred design alterative for the Project.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 7
The Draft PDR will include cost estimates for the remaining phases of the Project, including environmental and permitting, easement acquisition (City to provide land value assumptions), final engineering and design, services during construction (engineering support and construction management), construction, and O&M.

Construction cost estimates will be prepared to the level of accuracy based on the information available within normal industry standards. Estimates will be formatted in accordance with the Project design CSI specification format and segregated by facility. Where sufficient detailed information is lacking to obtain reasonably accurate prices of materials a contingency allowance may be applied. Escalation allowances will be used to provide an opinion of the estimated construction costs at the midpoint of construction.

This report is expected to be a working document at this stage of design.

JACOBS will facilitate a Preliminary Design Workshop with the City and agencies to review the preliminary design and receive input from the City and agencies.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Draft PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Subtask 5.2 – Pre-Final Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Pre-Final PDR for the Project. PDR review comments from the City and federal and state agencies will be incorporated. The Pre-Final submittal will include the concept drawings and preliminary construction costs. The PDR will include an estimate for annual operating costs, estimated service life for major components and equipment, and provide a life-cycle cost analysis for each alternative.

The Pre-Final PDR review submittal will recommend a project alternative and is intended to be essentially ready for City of Redding preferred alternative selection. The PDR will document the major design criteria used for the various project components.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Pre-Final PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Subtask 5.3 – Final Preliminary Design Report
This is the final phase of the PDR. Review comments from the Pre-Final PDR from the City of Redding review will be incorporated. JACOBS will prepare the Final PDR, which will be stamped by California Registered Professional Engineers. The Final PDR will include design criteria, to be used as the preliminary basis of design for Phase 2, for the City’s preferred alternative.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of P.E. stamped PDR documents.

Schedule
The Scope of Engineering Services and activities is anticipated to commence in May 2020 and will be completed no later than March 2021 assuming COVID-19 does not affect field work schedules. The Scope of Engineering Services and activities associated with this Project will be completed in accordance with the following approximate milestones:
▪ Project Authorized and Notice to Proceed by City of Redding– Mid-May 2020 ▪ Complete Draft Preliminary Design – September 2020

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 8
▪ Complete Pre-Final Preliminary Design – December 2020 ▪ Complete Final Preliminary Design – March 2021
The Scope of Engineering Services shall be considered complete when final deliverables are deemed acceptable by the City. Efforts will be made by the JACOBS to complete the work in a timely manner. However, it is agreed that the JACOBS cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond JACOBS control, or factors which would not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this Scope of Engineering Services was executed.

Budget
The budgetary amount for professional services and expenses are provided in Exhibit B. JACOBS will make reasonable efforts to complete the work within the budget. JACOBS is not obligated to incur costs beyond the indicated budget, as may be adjusted, and the City of Redding is not obligated to pay JACOBS beyond these limits.

The rates as shown in Exhibit B will be escalated for year 2021, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

In the event that a task or subtask is complete and the task or subtask budget is not fully spent, upon City approval, remaining funds may be transferred to other tasks which might require additional budget, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

Additional Services Not Included
The services described below are not included in this Scope of Engineering Services but can be performed if requested and approved by City and JACOBS. Time, scope, and fee have not been budgeted for the tasks listed hereunder. Authorization to proceed shall be in the form of an amendment to this Scope of Engineering Services specifying the work to be performed and the additional payment for such services rendered. ▪ Additional workshops not listed above
▪ Environmental permitting support exceeding those listed above ▪ Survey and mapping exceeding those listed above
▪ Final engineering and design services
▪ Construction management services
▪ Materials testing or special inspection services
▪ Additional items noted to be excluded within the Scope of Engineering Services If you have any questions or require further information do not hesitate to contact Kimberly Hein at 530.355.8488.

Sincerely,
Lisa Alliger, P.E. Kimberly Hein, P.E.

Manager of Projects Project Manager
cc: Kurt Maire, City of Redding Public Works Engineer

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Exhibit B
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding
Consultant Fee
Phase 1 Fee Summary
Task
No. Description Labor Fee
Subcontractor
Fee Expenses Fee
Task 1 Project Management
Task 1.1 Project Management $23,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,376.00 Task 1.2 Meetings $21,148.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $22,148.00 Task 1.3 Quality Control $17,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,664.00 Task 1 Subtotal $62,188.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $63,188.00
Task 2 Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Task 2.1 Data Review $14,892.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,892.00
Task 2.2 Geotechnical
Investigations
$41,016.00 $19,541.00 $2,000.00 $62,647.00
Task 2.2 Drilling/Pump Testing $0.00 $135,524.00 $0.00 $135,524.00 Task 2.3 Surveying and Mapping $4,080.00 $7,455.00 $800.00 $12,335.00 Task 2 Subtotal $59,988.00 $162,520.00 $2,800.00 $225,308.00 Task 3 Preliminary Environmental
Review
$44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 3 Subtotal $44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 4 Construction Funding
Evaluation
$19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 4 Subtotal $19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 5 Preliminary Design Report
(Preliminary, Pre-Final, and
Final PDR)
$136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
Task 5 Subtotal $136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $488,829.00

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PPS0402201345RDD 2
Consultant Rates
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding 2020 Hourly Billing Rates
Labor Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate
Office/Clerical/Accounting $108
Junior-Level Technician $80
Mid-level Technician $123
Senior-Level Technician $179
Staff Engineer 1 $122
Staff Engineer 2 $133
Associate Engineer $135
Project Engineer $187
Engineer Specialist/Associate Project Manager $204
Senior Technologist/Project Manager $255
Principal Technologist/Senior Project Manager $283
Includes engineering, consulting planner, and scientist disciplines.

Notes:
1) A markup of 5 percent will be applied to all Other Direct Costs and Expenses. 2) Direct expenses are those necessary costs and charges incurred for the PROJECT including, but not limited to:
a) The direct costs of transportation, meals and lodging, mail, subcontracts, outside services, and equipment and supplies.
b) Consultant’s current standard rate charges for direct use of Consultant’s vehicles, laboratory test and analysis, printing and reproduction services, and certain field equipment; and c) Consultant’s standard project charges for special health and safety requirements of Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3) Consultant’s current standard rates for direct expenses shall be used. These rates are subject to change following internal audits and reviews.
4) These rates are effective January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Rate schedule is subject to annual revision to reflect current rates and not to exceed 4 percent per year for subsequent years of the contract.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 373
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the City of Redding (City) Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Authorize the City Manager to submit a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act loan application in an amount not to exceed $25 million;
(2) Authorize the City Manager to submit U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration, National Culvert Removal, Replacement, and Restoration Grant Program (Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage Program) application in an amount not to exceed $6 million with a 20 percent local match of $1.2 million; and (3) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to complete the loan and grant submittal process and if awarded loan or grant funds, appropriate the funds, negotiate terms, if any and execute any agreements to implement either the loan or grant.

Fiscal Impact
The total Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $46 million. City of Redding (City) staff intends to obtain state and federal grants and potentially loans to fund the majority of the project costs. Project costs in excess of grant and loan funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated with the grants and interest or fees associated with the loans will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The Project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program. The Utility has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and has saved approximately $16.5 million for the Project to date.

City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.

MEETING DATE: May 21, 2024
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Low-Interest Loan to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project Michael Webb, Public Works
Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under the Water Infrastructure Finance & Innovation Act (WIFIA) loan program or the U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Culvert Aquatic Organism Passage (AOP) grant and provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.

PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component in the City’s water supply system.

PS01 was constructed in 1937 and has been in continual service since, with modifications and upgrades performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989. Staff plans to completely replace and relocate PS01 because it has reached the end of its service life, its current location is in a shallow portion of the river that significantly limits its capacity during low river levels, and its capacity will not meet expected future demands. The replacement station will be relocated approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing location to a deeper pool in the river. The new station will also have increased capacity to meet anticipated future demands, with proposed firm capacity of 42 million gallons per day (MGD) compared to its current capacity of 29 MGD. Project construction is anticipated to start in 2026 with completion expected in 2027 or 2028.

The new PS01 will be located adjacent to the confluence of Jenny Creek to the Sacramento River, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek during the construction of the Project. Jenny Creek is currently conveyed through two culverts beneath the Sacramento River Trail. The culverts are failing and their outlets are typically above the Sacramento River level preventing fish passage, so restoration of Jenny Creek is a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will need to perform at some point. The Jenny Creek restoration work will remove the culverts and restore the open channel, and provide two new bridges for trail access in the area. It will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead from the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the Project.

Jacobs was selected to provide professional consulting services for the Project, including a preliminary design report, environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the project. Within its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying grant and loan opportunities and applying for grants. If application for the WIFIA loan and Culvert AOP Program Grant are approved by the Council, then Jacobs will assist staff with the applications.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 375 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
On September 7, 2023, the Council approved the City as an applicant for three grants and one loan associated with the Project, including grants administered by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), the Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB), and the National Marine Fisheries Services (NMFS), and a loan administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). A summary of the grants and loans that Council has approved applications for to date, and those that are requested for Council approval herein are provided in Table 1.

Table 1- Grant/Loan Project Funding Summary
Grant/Loan Program
Funding
Type
Council
Approval
Request
Limit
City Cost
Share1 Status
USFWS- National Fish
Passage Program Grant 9/7/23 $2 M $0.6 M Submitted Pre-App. Not Selected.

WCB- Stream Flow
Enhancement Program Grant 9/7/23 $5 M $1.5 M Submitted Pre-App. Awaiting response.

NMFS- Transformational
Habitat Restoration and
Coastal Resilience Program
Grant 9/7/23 $25 M $1.5 M Awaiting next
application cycle.

SWRCB- State Revolving
Fund (SRF) Loan 9/7/23 $40 M
$0 or
Low
Interest
Submitted app.

Awaiting response.

Sub Total (Council Approved to Date): $72 M $3.6 M
WIFIA Loan Pending $25 M Low
Interest
FHWA- Culvert AOP Grant Pending $6 M $1.2 M
Total: $103 M $4.8 M

1. City cost share shown does not include potential fees or interest associated with loans.

Although the approved request total of $72 million and the total request of $103 million in the table above is much higher than the expected project cost of $46 million, it is unknown which of these funding sources will actually be awarded. The City was not selected for the USFWS National Fish Passage Program and there may be a high level of competition with the other programs. In addition, the eligible project costs through the NMFS grant are probably closer to $5 million (lower than the approved request limit of $25 million shown above), so the maximum funding that could come from the applications that Council has approved to date is likely closer to a maximum of $50 million.

Given the uncertainty of funding that will be received, the long timelines often associated with the review and award process for grants, and to ensure that adequate funding is secured to construct the Project on schedule, staff intends to continue to seek and apply for funding opportunities, if approved by the Council, that could benefit the Project and reduce costs to the Utility. If the City is fortunate and is awarded funding from grants or loans in excess of the project costs, then the Utility will utilize funding that will minimize its long-term costs. The Utility’s preferred funding sources are ranked from highest to lowest in the following Table 2.

Funding sources at the top would be utilized over sources at the bottom, as available.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
Table 2- Preferred Funding Source Ranking
Rank Grant/Loan Program Reasons for Ranking
1 SWRCB- State Revolving Fund
(Principal Forgiveness, 0% interest)
No local match or interest.
2 Grant Programs No interest, but local match will likely be needed. 3 Water Utility Funds Insufficient funds for Project costs, but avoids loan interests.
4 SWRCB- State Revolving Fund
(with low interest rate)
Very low interest rates.
5 WIFIA Loan Interest rates likely higher than State Revolving Fund.

The WIFIA loan, which staff is requesting approval for application, is ranked the lowest of the identified funding options, but it could still be a good option to fund the Project if the other funding sources will not cover all Project costs. Staff’s intent, if Council approves, is to proceed with the initial steps for the WIFIA loan as a contingency plan to avoid project delays in the event that the other funding options do not become available.

The WIFIA program does not provide grants, but it still has a number of features and flexibilities that make it preferable to municipal revenue bonds and other loan programs for water, wastewater, and stormwater capital projects. Benefits include repayment period flexibility, low interest rates, an opportunity for a one-time renegotiation of the rate to a lower rate during the project implementation period, and lower initial costs/fees than municipal bonds. The repayment period for a WIFIA loan can be up to 35 years and the WIFIA program allows for the opportunity to delay the start of the repayment period up to five years after substantial completion of construction. Interest rates for WIFIA loans are set on the date the loan is closed and based on the U.S. Treasury State & Local Government Series interest rate for a comparable maturity. Interest rates are typically lower than municipal bond rates and currently the rate for a long-term WIFIA loan is approximately 4.4 percent.

The WIFIA loan program includes a two-part application process. If authorized by the Council, staff will proceed with part one of the process, which involves submitting a Letter of Interest to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). If the EPA selects the Project, then the City would be invited to proceed to part two of the process and apply for the loan. EPA only selects projects that it expects will proceed to closing. If the City were to proceed to part two of the process and submit a full application, then the City would be required to pay EPA an initial application review fee of $100,000 at the time of the application to cover costs for EPA’s external contractors’ (legal, financial and technical) review costs. When the loan is finalized the City would be required to pay the actual costs for EPA’s outside contractors, which are expected to total $100,000 to $150,000, including the initial review fee. The Utility Fund would pay for the application review fees, if necessary, and these review costs could be included in the loan.

Staff intends to proceed with part one of the process, which does not require any fees, and then await responses from the State Revolving Fund and grant applications prior to proceeding with Phase 2 of the WIFIA process and paying any fees, if selected and necessary.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council May 13, 2024
Re: 4.11(c)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 5
The WIFIA program has a rolling selection process with funding available on an ongoing basis.

It announced in its Fiscal Year 2023 Notices of Funding Availability that up to $7.5 billion of financing will be available. The need for the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and the public benefits that it will provide should make it a good candidate for EPA selection for a loan through its WIFIA program.

FHWA’s Culvert AOP Program is a competitive grant program that awards approximately $200 million in grants annually for projects that replace, remove, and repair culverts or weirs and meaningfully improve or restore fish passage for anadromous fish. It provides grants up to $50 million and would require a 20 percent non-federal match. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the Project meets the selection criteria and makes the Project a good candidate for receiving funding through this grant program.

Environmental Review
Applying for a loan or grant funding is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required at this time. The design and environmental technical studies are currently under way for the Pump Station 1 Project. These studies will provide the information necessary to ensure CEQA compliance prior to construction.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 379
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following relative to the funding, design, permitting, and construction of the Pump Station 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Approve the City of Redding (City) as applicant for a Service National Fish Passage Program Base Funding Grant, administered by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, requesting up to $2 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (2) Approve the City as applicant for a Water Supply for Environmental Flows (Stream Flow Enhancement Program) Grant, administered by the Wildlife Conservation Board requesting up to $5 million with up to a 30 percent local match; (3) Approve the City as applicant for a Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant, under Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act, administered by the National Marine Fisheries Service, requesting up to $25 million with up to a 30 percent local match;
(4) Approve the City as applicant for a Drinking Water State Revolving Fund grant, administered by the State Water Resources Control Board, requesting up to $40 million with no local match;
(5) Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application to the State Water Resources Control Board’s State Revolving Fund for the project and authorizing the Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director to sign and file necessary applications and amendments thereto on behalf of the City of Redding; and (6) Authorize the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents necessary to apply for the above grants, and execute any agreements necessary to implement the project should the grant(s) be awarded.

Fiscal Impact
The total Pump House 1 Project (Project) costs are estimated to be approximately $40 million.

Project costs in excess of grant funds received, as well as costs for the local matches associated MEETING DATE: September 19, 2023
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Project and Adopt Resolution approving a financial assistance application Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 2
with the grants will come from the Water Utility (Utility) Fund. The proposed grant programs do not require a local match, but applicants who offer some local match will typically be scored and ranked higher by the administering agencies and have a higher likelihood of receiving grant funding.

The project is included in the Utility’s current Capital Improvement Program and it has been setting aside six percent of annual revenues for several years and accumulated a balance of approximately $16.5 million.

City staff may request approval from City Council (Council) for application of additional grants and/or loans for the project in the future, as opportunities are identified.

Alternative Action
The Council may choose not to apply for funds under one or all of these grant programs and provide staff with alternative direction.

Background/Analysis
The City’s Pump Station 1 (PS01) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately one-quarter mile west and upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP). The FWTP is the City’s largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands.

PS01 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, which makes it a critical component of the City’s water supply system.

PS01 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 29 million gallons-per-day. Staff plans to completely replace PS01 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its pumping capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District dam, which is downriver;
• The existing intake and screens may not meet long-term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species;
• Pumping capacity will need to be increased to meet the future demands of the FWTP; and • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during an earthquake.

On May 5, 2020, the Council authorized execution of a Consulting and Professional Services Contract (C-8541) with Jacobs to perform an evaluation of project alternatives and prepare a Preliminary Design Report for replacement of PS01. Based on recommendations in the Preliminary Design Report, the City has elected to proceed with a project alternative to replace and relocate PS01 at a new river trail location, approximately 1,600 feet west and upriver from the existing station.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 3
The new PS01 location is in a deeper area within the Sacramento River that will allow for better operations and reliability. The new location is also adjacent to Jenny Creek, which presents an opportunity for the City to restore Jenny Creek in the area, a need that state regulating agencies have indicated the City will be required to perform, at some point. The creek restoration work will include removal of two existing culverts and restoration to an open channel. The culverts are currently preventing passage of Chinook salmon and steelhead into Jenny Creek. The restoration work will reconnect spawning salmon and steelhead in the Sacramento River to Jenny Creek, improve the pedestrian experience along the river trail, as well as open grant opportunities for the project.

On March 7, 2023, the Council authorized execution of an amendment to Jacobs’ contract for the second phase of professional consultant services associated with the project, including environmental permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, final design, and engineering services during bidding and construction for the selected project alternative. Under its scope of services, Jacobs has assisted the City in identifying these grant opportunities and will continue to assist the City with applications for the grants, if approved by the Council.

The National Fish Passage Program (NFPP) grant program provides direct technical and financial assistance to remove instream barriers and restore aquatic organism passage and aquatic connectivity for the benefit of Federal trust resources. It aims to maintain or increase fish populations to improve ecosystem resiliency, provide quality fishing experiences, support the modernization of infrastructure, and contribute to enhanced community resilience to the impacts from climate change and other public safety hazards. NFPP funds a variety of project types including, but not limited to, dam removals, culvert replacements, floodplain restoration, and the installation of fishways. The Jenny Creek restoration portion of the project makes it a good candidate to potentially receive grant funding from this program.

The Wildlife Conservation Board (WCB) was created by statute in 1947 to conserve California’s wildlife resources and provide for public recreation. WCB awards grants for fish and wildlife habitat conservation, restoration, and for development of compatible public access facilities. Its Stream Flow Enhancement Grant Program also presents a funding opportunity for the project with the Jenny Creek restoration work included.

The Transformational Habitat Restoration and Coastal Resilience Grant program aim is to support transformational habitat restoration projects that restore marine, estuarine, or coastal ecosystems, using approaches that enhance community and ecosystem resilience to climate hazards. It prioritizes funding for habitat restoration actions that demonstrate significant impacts, rebuild productive and sustainable fisheries, contribute to the recovery and conservation of threatened and endangered species, promote climate-resilient ecosystems, especially in tribal, indigenous, and/or underserved communities, and improve economic vitality. The project should be a good candidate for funding from this program because of the included Jenny Creek restoration work.

State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) provides drinking water State Revolving Fund (SRF) funds for a wide range of drinking water infrastructure projects, including projects for treatment, transmission, distribution, source, storage, consolidation, and creation of new systems.

City staff and Jacobs are confirming that the City will meet disadvantaged community requirements for loan forgiveness (grants) for this project. The City intends to apply for these grant funds to supplement design and construction costs associated with the Pump Station 1

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council September 11, 2023
Re: 4.11(d)--Approve City of Redding as Applicant for Grants to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement Page 4
replacement. Prior to any SRF application submittal, an authorizing resolution is required. Staff has prepared the attached resolution for the Council’s consideration. The application resolution also provides SWRCB staff with the assurance the City is committed to the project. The resolution has been approved as to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required. The design and technical studies will provide the information necessary to ensure environmental compliance as the project progresses.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
^Resolution
^Location Map
Previous Staff Report

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) RESOLUTION NO. 2023-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING DESIGNATED CITY OFFICIALS TO FILE AN

APPLICATION FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A FINANCIAL

AGREEMENT FROM THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL

BOARD TO ACCEPT AND EXPEND THOSE FUNDS IF THE

APPLICATION IS GRANTED
WHEREAS, the City of Redding (the “City) desires to apply for grant funding for its Pump Station 1 Replacement Project (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, the City intends to finance the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project with monies (the “Project Funds”) provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (the “State Water Board”); and WHEREAS, the State Water Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the sale of obligations, the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the “Obligations”); and
WHEREAS, prior to either the issuance of Obligations or the approval by the State Water Board of the Project Funds, the City desires to incur certain capital expenditures (the “Expenditures”) with respect to the Project from available monies of the City; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that those monies to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the City for the Expenditures from the proceeds of the Obligations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

1. The Public Works Director or Assistant Public Works Director (the “Authorized Representative”), or his/her designee, is hereby authorized and directed to sign and file, for and on behalf of, the City of Redding, a Financial Assistance Application for the financing agreement from the State Water Board for the planning, design, construction, and associated fees of the Project.

2. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to provide the assurances, certifications, and commitments required for the financial assistance application, including executing a financial assistance agreement from the State Water resources Control Board and any amendments or changes thereto.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

3. The Authorized Representative, or his/her designee, is designated to represent the City of Redding in carrying out the City’s responsibilities under the financing agreement, including certifying disbursement requests on behalf of the City of Redding and compliance with applicable state and federal laws.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 19th day of September, 2023, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
__________________________________
MICHAEL DACQUISTO, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
_________________________________ ___________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk BARRY E. DeWALT, City Attorney

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 385 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 386
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize the following actions relative to Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 5094, to provide engineering services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project:
(1) Award to Jacobs;
(2) Authorize the Mayor to execute the Consultant and Professional Services Contract with Jacobs for Phase 1 (preliminary design) of the project, including project management, data review, geotechnical investigations, survey/mapping, preliminary environmental review, construction financing evaluation, and preparation of a preliminary design report for replacement of Pump House 1 for a not-to-exceed fee of $488,829; and (3) Authorize the City Manager to approve contract amendments not to exceed $150,000.

Fiscal Impact
The total project costs are expected to be roughly $30 million. Funding for this project will come from the Water Utility Fund and the project is included in the current Capital Improvement Program. The City of Redding (City) plans to obtain State or Federal loans and/or grants, with the design consultant’s assistance, to fund a portion of the construction costs for the project.

Should funding from loans or grants not materialize, the City may need to issue municipal bonds.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to award the contract for Phase 1 preliminary design services for the project. This alternative will delay or eliminate the construction of the Pump House 1 Replacement Project subjecting the City’s water system to significant vulnerabilities and potential regulatory action.

MEETING DATE: May 5, 2020
ITEM NO. 4.11(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 and Authorize Execution of Consulting and Professional Services Contract for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project Chuck Aukland, Public
Works Director

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 387 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 2 Background
The City’s water system includes two water treatment plants, approximately 555 miles of conveyance and distribution pipelines, 17 groundwater wells, 10 pump stations, and 12 reservoirs providing a total of 33.5 million gallons of storage. The City’s Pump House 1 (PH1) is located on the south bank of the Sacramento River, along the Sacramento River Trail and approximately 1/4 mile upriver from the Diestelhorst and Lake Redding Bridges. It pumps water from the Sacramento River to the City’s Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP), its largest and primary water supply, providing more than half of the City’s drinking water during average and peak demands. PH1 is the only source of raw water to the FWTP, making it a very critical component of the City’s water supply chain.

PH1 was constructed in 1937, and has been in continual service since that time. Major modifications were performed in 1968, 1981, and 1989, to replace aging pumps and add new pumps to increase the station’s capacity. It currently has five vertical turbine pumps and its firm capacity is approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (MGD).

In 2002, a feasibility study entitled “Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project” (Feasibility Study) was prepared for the City by CH2M Hill (now Jacobs). Available funding was insufficient at that time to construct a new pumping facility or even to complete many of the recommended modifications. Therefore, the City was directed by National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries to pursue an interim retrofit solution for fish screening, which was installed at PH1 in 2006. However, the retrofitted screens depart from standard criteria under certain river and operating conditions and as such are not a long term solution.

City staff plans to completely replace PH1 because of the following general deficiencies:
• Its intake is located in a shallow area of the river that impacts its capacity depending on the status of the Anderson Cottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) dam downriver. • The existing intake and screens may not meet long term state and federal criteria regarding protection of endangered fish species.
• Its capacity will need to be increased to meet the future capacity of the FWTP. • Based on the City’s General Plan seismic hazard map, it is located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and may not be adequate to withstand critical damage during a design earthquake.

City staff will consider four project alternatives, or combinations thereof, for replacement of Pump House 1, including:
• Replacement at the existing Pump House 1 location;
• Replacement at a new river trail location, approximately 2,000 feet upriver; • Replacement at the Keswick Reservoir; and
• Replacement with a riverbank filtration collector well system.

Design services for the PH1 replacement will be broken into two phases. Phase 1 of the design is included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will include preliminary design services for evaluation of the project alternatives, and preparation of a preliminary design report to allow the City to determine the appropriate project alternative to pursue.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 3 Phase 2 of the design is not included in the attached Consulting and Professional Services Contract. It will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, preparation of contract documents, and design services during the bid and construction periods for the selected project alternative. If the City is satisfied with Jacobs’ services at the completion of Phase 1 (expected spring of 2021), then staff intends to recommend at that time that the Council authorize negotiation for an amendment with Jacobs to add Phase 2 design services to the Contract.

Otherwise, a separate RFP will be required for Phase 2 engineering services.

CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS
A review and selection panel was formed with five members from the Public Works Water and Engineering Divisions. The panel’s evaluation was based on consultants’ ability and qualifications to perform all phases of the engineering services that will be required, including both Phases 1 and 2.

Four proposals, including design fees in sealed envelopes, were received on January 24, 2020.

The panel members evaluated and scored each proposal based on consultants’ understanding of the project/scope, project approach, experience with fish screens, experience with riverbank filtration collector wells, qualifications of the project team and manager, familiarity with City projects and required procedures, ability to complete projects on-time and within budget, and the proposed teams’ location. After reviewing the proposals, the panel elected to interview all four of the firms that proposed.

Oral interviews were held on March 12, 2020, at City Hall. Each consultant team was allowed 55 minutes to provide a presentation and answer the City’s questions. The questions asked were the same for all consultant teams and were not provided to any team until they arrived for the interview; at which time, each participant was provided the questions in writing. Review Panel members evaluated and scored each consultant team based on their presentation and responses to the questions.

After the oral interviews, the review panel:
• Combined scores from the consultants’ proposals and oral interview to determine their overall score;
• Ranked consultants based on their overall score; and
• After ranking, opened consultant’s sealed fee envelopes.

The panel ranked the firms as follows:

Rank Firm Fee
1 Jacobs $488,829
2 Black & Veatch $576,210
3 West Yost $997,956
4 Stantech $1,160,516
Applying the evaluation criteria to the proposals and oral interview scoring, it is the opinion of the selection panel that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required services. This opinion is in part based on Jacobs’:
• Excellent fish screen and riverbank collector well design experience and qualifications; • Environmental and compliance team has a proven track record with similar projects;

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Report to Redding City Council April 28, 2020
Re: 4.11(d)--Award Request for Proposals No. 5094 Page 4 • Design experience in the Sacramento River near the project area; • Creative design approach and ideas presented in their oral interview; and • Local team.

Replacement of Pump House 1 has been included in the City’s Water Master Plan for several years and is a necessary and critical improvement for the City’s water supply chain. Staff believes that Jacobs is the most qualified team to provide the required design services and recommends that the Council authorize recommendations listed herein, including award to Jacobs’ for an amount not-to-exceed $488,829.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• This agenda item is a routine operational item.

Attachments
Agreement (available online)
Location Map

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 1 Rev. 02/17

CITY OF REDDING

CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT
THIS CONTRACT is made at Redding, California, by and between the City of Redding (“City”), a municipal corporation, and Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. (“Consultant”) for the purpose of City of Redding Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1-Preliminary Design).

WHEREAS, City does not have sufficient personnel to perform the services required herein thereby necessitating this Contract for personal services.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties covenant and agree, for good consideration hereby acknowledged, as follows:

SECTION 1. CONSULTANT SERVICES
Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Contract, Consultant shall provide to City the services described in Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein. Consultant shall provide the services at the time, place and in the manner specified in Exhibit A.

SECTION 2. COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS
A. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract, at the times and in the manner set forth in Exhibit B, attached and incorporated herein, in a total amount not to exceed Four Hundred Eighty-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred TwentyNine Dollars ($488,829). This sum includes all out-of-pocket travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred by Consultant that are reasonably associated with the provision of services under this Contract. The payments specified herein shall be the only payments to be made to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Contract.

B. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for work completed to the date of the invoice. All invoices shall be itemized to reflect the employees performing the requested tasks, the billing rate for each employee and the hours worked.

C. All correct, complete and undisputed invoices sent by Consultant to City shall be paid within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt.

D. Pursuant to Section 1781 of the Labor Code, Consultant is advised that the work contemplated in Exhibit A, Task 2.2 and 2.3 of this contract is subject to the payment of prevailing wages and all other requirements of the Prevailing Wage Law. The prevailing wage of each job classification may be found by inquiry with the California Department of Industrial Relations. Consultant shall comply with all laws related to the performance of public work including, but not limited to, the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 2 Rev. 02/17
employment of apprentices pursuant to Section 1777.5 of the Labor Code, work day/week hours and overtime rates pursuant to Sections 1813 and 1815of the Labor Code and the obligation set forth in Section 1774-1776 of the Labor Code in regards to payment of prevailing wages and to provide the City of Redding and Department of Industrial Relations certified payrolls when required. A certified copy of all payroll records relative to this project shall be submitted to the City of Redding along with the related invoice. Receipt of certified payroll records is a prerequisite to receiving payment.

E. No Consultant or subconsultant may be listed on a bid proposal for a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. No Consultant or subconsultant may be awarded a contract for public work on a public works project unless registered with the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. All Consultants and subconsultants must furnish electronic certified payroll records to the Labor Commissioner. This requirement applies to all public works projects, whether new or ongoing. Consultant is further advised that the work contemplated herein is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations.

SECTION 3. TERM AND TERMINATION
A. Consultant shall commence work on or about May 11, 2020, and complete said work no later than December 31, 2021. Time is of the essence.

B. If Consultant fails to perform its duties to the satisfaction of City, or if consultant fails to fulfill in a timely and professional manner its obligations under this Contract, then City shall have the right to terminate this Contract effective immediately upon City giving written notice thereof to Consultant.

C. Either Party may terminate this Contract without cause on thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice. Notwithstanding the preceding, if the term set forth in Section 3.A. of this Contract exceeds ninety (90) calendar days in duration, Consultant’s sole right to terminate shall be limited to termination for cause.

D. Consultant hereby acknowledges and agrees that the obligation of City to pay under this Contract is contingent upon the availability of City’s funds which are appropriated or allocated by the City Council. Should the funding for the project and/or work set forth herein not be appropriated or allocated by the City Council, City may terminate this Agreement by furnishing at least thirty (30) calendar days’ written notice of its intention to terminate. In the event of a termination pursuant to this subdivision, Consultant shall not be entitled to a remedy of acceleration of payments due over the term of this Agreement. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the power to terminate described herein is required by Article 16, Section 18, of the California Constitution, and that constitutional provision supersedes any law, rule, regulation or statute which conflicts with the provisions of this Section.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 3 Rev. 02/17
E. In the event that City gives notice of termination, Consultant shall promptly provide to City any and all finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Contract. City shall have full ownership, including, but not limited to, intellectual property rights, and control of all such finished and unfinished reports, data, studies, photographs, charts or other work product.

F. In the event that City terminates the Contract, City shall pay Consultant the reasonable value of services rendered by Consultant pursuant to this Contract; provided, however, that City shall not in any manner be liable for lost profits which might have been made by Consultant had Consultant completed the services required by this Contract. Consultant shall, not later than ten (10) calendar days after termination of this Contract by City, furnish to City such financial information as in the judgment of the City’s representative is necessary to determine the reasonable value of the services rendered by Consultant.

G. In no event shall the termination or expiration of this Contract be construed as a waiver of any right to seek remedies in law, equity or otherwise for a Party’s failure to perform each obligation required by this Contract.

SECTION 4. MISCELLANEOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT A. City shall make its facilities accessible to Consultant as required for Consultant’s performance of its services under this Contract, and, upon request of Consultant, provide labor and safety equipment as required by Consultant for such access.

B. Pursuant to the City’s business license ordinance, Consultant shall obtain a City business license prior to commencing work.

C. Consultant represents and warrants to City that it has all licenses, permits, qualifications and approvals of any nature whatsoever that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, keep in effect or obtain at all times during the term of this Contract any licenses, permits and approvals that are legally required for Consultant to practice its profession.

D. Consultant shall, during the entire term of this Contract, be construed to be an independent contractor and nothing in this Contract is intended, nor shall it be construed, to create an employer/employee relationship, association, joint venture relationship, trust or partnership or to allow City to exercise discretion or control over the professional manner in which Consultant performs under this Contract. Any and all taxes imposed on Consultant’s income, imposed or assessed by reason of this Contract or its performance, including but not limited to sales or use taxes, shall be paid by Consultant. Consultant shall be responsible for any taxes or penalties assessed by reason of any claims that Consultant is an employee of City. Consultant shall not

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 4 Rev. 02/17
be eligible for coverage under City’s workers’ compensation insurance plan, benefits under the Public Employee Retirement System or be eligible for any other City benefit.

E. No provision of this Contract is intended to, or shall be for the benefit of, or construed to create rights in, or grant remedies to, any person or entity not a party hereto.

F. No portion of the work or services to be performed under this Contract shall be assigned, transferred, conveyed or subcontracted without the prior written approval of City. Consultant may use the services of independent contractors and subcontractors to perform a portion of its obligations under this Contract with the prior written approval of City. Independent contractors and subcontractors shall be provided with a copy of this Contract and Consultant shall have an affirmative duty to assure that said independent contractors and subcontractors comply with the same and agree to be bound by its terms. Consultant shall be the responsible party with respect to all actions of its independent contractors and subcontractors, and shall obtain such insurance and indemnity provisions from its contractors and subcontractors as City’s Risk Manager shall determine to be necessary.

G. Consultant, at such times and in such form as City may require, shall furnish City with such periodic reports as it may request pertaining to the work or services undertaken pursuant to this Contract, the costs or obligations incurred or to be incurred in connection therewith, and any other matters covered by this Contract.

H. Consultant shall maintain accounts and records, including personnel, property and financial records, adequate to identify and account for all costs pertaining to this Contract and such other records as may be deemed necessary by City to assure proper accounting for all project funds. These records shall be made available for audit purposes to state and federal authorities, or any authorized representative of City.

Consultant shall retain such records for three (3) years after the expiration of this Contract, unless prior permission to destroy them is granted by City.

I. Consultant shall perform all services required pursuant to this Contract in the manner and according to the standards observed by a competent practitioner of Consultant’s profession. All products of whatsoever nature which Consultant delivers to City pursuant to this Contract shall be prepared in a professional manner and conform to the standards of quality normally observed by a person practicing the profession of Consultant and its agents, employees and subcontractors assigned to perform the services contemplated by this Contract.

J. All completed reports and other data or documents, or computer media including diskettes, and other materials provided or prepared by Consultant in accordance with this Contract are the property of City, and may be used by City. City shall have all intellectual property rights including, but not limited to, copyright and patent rights, in said documents, computer media, and other materials provided by Consultant. City shall release, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant from all claims, costs,

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 5 Rev. 02/17
expenses, damage or liability arising out of or resulting from City’s use or modification of any reports, data, documents, drawings, specifications or other work product prepared by Consultant, except for use by City on those portions of the City’s project for which such items were prepared.

K. Consultant, including its employees, agents, and subconsultants, shall not maintain or acquire any direct or indirect interest that conflicts with the performance of this Contract. Consultant shall comply with all requirements of the Political Reform Act (Government Code § 8100 et seq.) and other laws relating to conflicts of interest, including the following: 1) Consultant shall not make or participate in a decision made by City if it is reasonably foreseeable that the decision may have a material effect on Consultant’s economic interest, and 2) if required by the City Attorney, Consultant shall file financial disclosure forms with the City Clerk.

SECTION 5. INSURANCE
A. Unless modified in writing by City’s Risk Manager, Consultant shall maintain the following noted insurance during the duration of the Contract:

Coverage Required Not Required
Commercial General Liability X
Comprehensive Vehicle Liability X
Workers’ Compensation and Employers’ Liability X
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) X
(Place an “x” in the appropriate box)
B. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:

1. Insurance Services Office form number CG-0001, Commercial General Liability Insurance, in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence and $2,000,000 general aggregate for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage;

2. Insurance Services Office form number CA-0001 (Ed. 1/87), Comprehensive Automobile Liability Insurance, which provides for total limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limits per accident applicable to all owned, non-owned and hired vehicles;

3. Statutory Workers’ Compensation required by the Labor Code of the State of California and Employers' Liability Insurance in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence. Both the Workers’ Compensation and Employers' Liability policies shall contain the insurer's waiver of subrogation in favor of City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers;

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 6 Rev. 02/17

4. Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions) Insurance, appropriate to Consultant’s profession, against loss due to error or omission or malpractice in an amount not less than $1,000,000.

5. The City does not accept insurance certificates or endorsements with the wording “but only in the event of a named insured’s sole negligence” or any other verbiage limiting the insured’s insurance responsibility.

C. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by City.

At the option of the City, either: the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.

D. The General Liability shall contain or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:

1. City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents are to be covered as additional insured as respects liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of Consultant; premises owned, leased or used by Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by Consultant.

The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers.

2. The insurance coverage of Consultant shall be primary insurance as respects City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City, its elected officials, officers, employees, agents and volunteers, shall be in excess of Consultant’s insurance and shall not contribute with it.

3. Coverage shall state that the insurance of Consultant shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability.

4. Each insurance policy required by this Contract shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be canceled except after thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice has been given to City. In addition, Consultant agrees that it shall not reduce its coverage or limits on any such policy except after thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice has been given to City.

E. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M.Best’s rating of no less than A-VII.

F. Consultant shall designate the City of Redding as a Certificate Holder of the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 7 Rev. 02/17
insurance. Consultant shall furnish City with certificates of insurance and original endorsements effecting the coverages required by this clause. Certificates and endorsements shall be furnished to: Risk Management Department, City of Redding, 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001. The certificates and endorsements for each insurance policy are to be signed by a person authorized by the insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City’s Risk Manager prior to the commencement of contracted services. City may withhold payments to Consultant if adequate certificates of insurance and endorsements required have not been provided, or not been provided in a timely manner.

G. The requirements as to the types and limits of insurance coverage to be maintained by Consultant as required by Section 5 of this Contract, and any approval of said insurance by City, are not intended to and will not in any manner limit or qualify the liabilities and obligations otherwise assumed by Consultant pursuant to this Contract, including, without limitation, provisions concerning indemnification.

H. If any policy of insurance required by this Section is a “claims made” policy, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure § 342 and Government Code § 945.6, Consultant shall keep said insurance in effect for a period of eighteen (18) months after the termination of this Contract.

I. If any damage, including death, personal injury or property damage, occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall immediately notify City’s Risk Manager by telephone at (530) 225-4068. No later than three (3) calendar days after the event, Consultant shall submit a written report to City’s Risk Manager containing the following information, as applicable: 1) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); 2) name and address of witnesses; 3) name and address of Consultant’s insurance company; and 4) a detailed description of the damage and whether any City property was involved.

SECTION 6. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS
A. Consistent with California Civil Code § 2782.8, when the services to be provided under this Contract are design professional services to be performed by a design professional, as that term is defined under Section 2782.8, Consultant shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of, or resulting from, directly or indirectly, the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant, its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 8 Rev. 02/17
B. Other than in the performance of professional services by a design professional, which is addressed solely by subdivision (A) of this Section, and to the fullest extent permitted by law, Consultant shall indemnify protect, defend and hold harmless, City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, costs, liability, claims, losses, penalties and expenses (including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees of the City Attorney or legal counsel retained by City, expert fees, litigation costs, and investigation costs) of every type and description to which any or all of them may be subjected by reason of the performance of the services required under this Contract by Consultant its officers, employees or agents in the performance of professional services under this Contract, except when liability arises due to the sole negligence, active negligence or misconduct of the City.

C. The Consultant’s obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless shall not be excused because of the Consultant’s inability to evaluate liability. The Consultant shall respond within thirty (30) calendar days to the tender of any claim for defense and indemnity by the City, unless this time has been extended in writing by the City.

If the Consultant fails to accept or reject a tender of defense and indemnity in writing delivered to City within thirty (30) calendar days, in addition to any other remedy authorized by law, the City may withhold such funds the City reasonably considers necessary for its defense and indemnity until disposition has been made of the claim or until the Consultant accepts or rejects the tender of defense in writing delivered to the City, whichever occurs first. This subdivision shall not be construed to excuse the prompt and continued performance of the duties required of Consultant herein.

D. The obligation to indemnify, protect, defend, and hold harmless set forth in this Section applies to all claims and liability regardless of whether any insurance policies are applicable. The policy limits of said insurance policies do not act as a limitation upon the amount of indemnification to be provided by Contractor.

E. City shall have the right to approve or disapprove the legal counsel retained by Consultant pursuant to this Section to represent City’s interests. City shall be reimbursed for all costs and attorney's fees incurred by City in enforcing the obligations set forth in this Section.

SECTION 7. CONTRACT INTERPRETATION, VENUE AND ATTORNEY FEES A. This Contract shall be deemed to have been entered into in Redding, California. All questions regarding the validity, interpretation or performance of any of its terms or of any rights or obligations of the parties to this Contract shall be governed by California law. If any claim, at law or otherwise, is made by either party to this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees.

B. This document, including all exhibits, contains the entire agreement between the

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 9 Rev. 02/17
parties and supersedes whatever oral or written understanding each may have had prior to the execution of this Contract. This Contract shall not be altered, amended or modified except by a writing signed by City and Consultant. No verbal agreement or conversation with any official, officer, agent or employee of City, either before, during or after the execution of this Contract, shall affect or modify any of the terms or conditions contained in this Contract, nor shall any such verbal agreement or conversation entitle Consultant to any additional payment whatsoever under the terms of this Contract.

C. No covenant or condition to be performed by Consultant under this Contract can be waived except by the written consent of City. Forbearance or indulgence by City in any regard whatsoever shall not constitute a waiver of the covenant or condition in question. Until performance by Consultant of said covenant or condition is complete, City shall be entitled to invoke any remedy available to City under this Contract or by law or in equity despite said forbearance or indulgence.

D. If any portion of this Contract or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be invalid or unenforceable to any extent, the remainder of this Contract shall not be affected thereby and shall be enforced to the greatest extent permitted by law.

E. The headings in this Contract are inserted for convenience only and shall not constitute a part hereof. A waiver of any party of any provision or a breach of this Contract must be provided in writing, and shall not be construed as a waiver of any other provision or any succeeding breach of the same or any other provisions herein.

F. Each Party hereto declares and represents that in entering into this Contract, it has relied and is relying solely upon its own judgment, belief and knowledge of the nature, extent, effect and consequence relating thereto. Each Party further declares and represents that this Contract is made without reliance upon any statement or representation not contained herein of any other Party or any representative, agent or attorney of the other Party. The Parties agree that they are aware that they have the right to be advised by counsel with respect to the negotiations, terms, and conditions of this Contract and that the decision of whether or not to seek the advice of counsel with respect to this Contract is a decision which is the sole responsibility of each of the Parties. Accordingly, no party shall be deemed to have been the drafter hereof, and the principle of law set forth in Civil Code § 1654 that contracts are construed against the drafter shall not apply.

G. Each of the Parties hereto hereby irrevocably waives any and all right to trial by jury in any action, proceeding, claim or counterclaim, whether in contract or tort, at law or in equity, arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby. Each Party further waives any right to consolidate any action which a jury trial has been waived with any other action in which a jury trial cannot be or has not been waived.

H. In the event of a conflict between the term and conditions of the body of this Contract

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 10 Rev. 02/17
and those of any exhibit or attachment hereto, the terms and conditions set forth in the body of this Contract proper shall prevail. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by Consultant.

SECTION 8. SURVIVAL
The provisions set forth in Sections 3 through 7, inclusive, of this Contract shall survive termination of the Contract.

SECTION 9. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS - NONDISCRIMINATION
A. Consultant shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances and codes of federal, state and local governments.

B. In the performance of this Contract, Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Consultant shall take affirmative action to ensure applicants are employed and that employees are treated during their employment without regard to their race, color, ancestry, national origin, religious creed, sex, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, political affiliation, or membership or nonmembership in any organization. Such actions shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of pay or other forms of compensation and selection for training.

SECTION 10. REPRESENTATIVES
A. City’s representative for this Contract is Kurt Maire, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 225-4081, fax number (530) 245-7024. All of Consultant’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person, or to the representative's designee.

B. Consultant’s representative for this Contract is Kim Hein, email [email protected], telephone number (530) 355-8488. All of City’s questions pertaining to this Contract shall be referred to the above-named person.

C. The representatives set forth herein shall have authority to give all notices required herein.

SECTION 11. NOTICES
A. All notices, requests, demands and other communications hereunder shall be deemed given only if in writing signed by an authorized representative of the sender (may be other than the representatives referred to in Section 10) and delivered by facsimile,

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PREVWAGE-Consulting and Professional Services Contract Page 11 Rev. 02/17
with a hard copy mailed first class, postage prepaid; or when sent by a courier or an express service guaranteeing overnight delivery to the receiving party, addressed to the respective parties as follows:

To City:

City of Redding – Engineering
Mr. Kurt Maire, P.E.
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
To Consultant:

Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

Mrs. Kimberly Hein, P.E.
2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
B. Either party may change its address for the purposes of this paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other party in the manner provided in this Section.

C. Notice shall be deemed effective upon: 1) personal service; 2) two calendar days after mailing or transmission by facsimile, whichever is earlier.

SECTION 12. AUTHORITY TO CONTRACT
A. Each of the undersigned signatories hereby represents and warrants that they are authorized to execute this Contract on behalf of the respective parties to this Contract; that they have full right, power and lawful authority to undertake all obligations as provided in this Contract; and that the execution, performance and delivery of this Contract by said signatories has been fully authorized by all requisite actions on the part of the respective parties to this Contract.

B. When the Mayor is signatory to this Contract, the City Manager and/or the Department Director having direct responsibility for managing the services provided herein shall have authority to execute any amendment to this Contract which does not increase the amount of compensation allowable to Consultant or otherwise substantially change the scope of the services provided herein.

SECTION 13. DATE OF CONTRACT
The date of this Contract shall be the date it is signed by City.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) 2525 Airpark Drive
Redding, CA 96001
United States
T +1.530.243.5831
F +1.530.243.1654
www.jacobs.com
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.

PPS0402201345RDD 1
Exhibit A
April 14, 2020
Attention: Josh Watkins, Water Manager
City of Redding
777 Cypress Avenue
Redding, CA 96001
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project (Phase 1 – Preliminary Design)
Dear Mr. Watkins:

This letter presents Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc.’s (JACOBS) proposed Scope of Engineering Services (Exhibit A) for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project - Phase 1 Preliminary Design (Project). We are proposing to perform the work under the City of Redding Consulting and Professional Services Agreement on a not-toexceed time and materials basis per the rate schedule (Exhibit B).

Per Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 5094, the effort associated with this Project will require two separate phases.

Phase 1 will involve preliminary design (alternatives evaluation) services and preparation of a Preliminary Design Report (PDR) with recommendations. Phase 2 will involve the detailed design, environmental compliance documentation, permitting, project funding assistance, right-of-way acquisition, and preparation of contract documents, as well as design services during the bid and construction periods for replacement of Pump House 1 (PS1)and installation of a new raw water pipeline, as required. The City will issue a contract for Phase 1. If the City is satisfied with the PDR and the JACOBS services to that point, the City intends to provide JACOBS a contract amendment to work on Phase 2.

Project Introduction
The City of Redding (City) PS1 supplies approximately 28.9 million gallons per day (mgd) of Sacramento River water to the Foothill Water Treatment Plant (FWTP) through two 30-inch-diameter pipelines. It is the primary delivery source and a critical component for the FWTP. PS1 is currently located on the right bank (looking downstream) of the Sacramento River along the Sacramento River Trail approximately 0.25 miles upstream of the Diestelhorst Bridge.

PS1 is scheduled for replacement based primarily on the following:
▪ Current location is within significant habitat for endangered winter-run salmon and the current screening is not optimal for species protection and does not meet state and federal fishery criteria. ▪ Limited intake capacity during low river stages due to shallow river depth during times when the AndersonCottonwood Irrigation District (ACID) diversion dam flashboards are not in place. This situation makes the City dependent on ACID operations at the diversion dam, which typically has flashboards installed only from April to November.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 2
▪ The City’s General Plan identified PS1 as being located in an area of high seismic liquefaction potential and recommended that the structure be evaluated for its ability to withstand damage during a design earthquake.
▪ Proposed FWTP expansion up to a capacity of 42 mgd per the City’s Water Master Plan. ▪ Limited workspace for maintenance around the pumping units and other equipment.

The objective of Phase 1 Preliminary Design is to provide review of alternatives, sufficient engineering, major design elements, economic information, and screening the alternatives so the City can decide how to proceed with implementation of the Project. Alternatives, including combinations thereof, will be selected in a collaborative process with the City to be evaluated during Phase 1 and include the following:
▪ Alternative 1 – Existing Pump Station 1 Location
▪ Alternative 2 – New River Trail Location
▪ Alternative 4 – Keswick Reservoir Location
▪ Alternative 5 – Riverbank Filtration Collector Well System Scope of Engineering Services
The scope of engineering services to provide for the Project definition phase are outlined by tasks below:

Task 1 – Project Management, Meetings, and Quality Control Subtask 1.1 – Project Management
The purpose of this subtask is to provide for the initiation and overall management of Project activities. An overall schedule and work plan will be developed and implemented so that work activities are completed in an integrated and timely manner. In addition, this task includes those elements necessary to manage, lead, and control the Project.

JACOBS will furnish project management services for the Project, as follows:
▪ Status Reporting – Monitor budget, progress, and schedule. Monitor work efforts and evaluate actual versus planned progress. Changes in scope will be communicated to the City. Provide verbal progress reports to the City’s project manager as necessary.
▪ Administration – Maintain Project records, manage and process Project communications, and coordinate Project administrative matters. Prepare monthly invoices and Project status reports. ▪ Coordination – Coordinate tasks/subtasks and staff, including coordination with the City, to complete authorized work on schedule and within budget.

JACOBS will manage the health, safety, and environmental activities of its staff. JACOBS will prepare a projectspecific Health and Safety Plan. JACOBS will address safety in the office and during site visits. JACOBS is not responsible for the health and safety of other project participants.

Deliverables: Monthly invoices with status reports.

Subtask 1.2 – Meetings
The purpose of this subtask is to provide coordination of Project activities.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 3
JACOBS will conduct meetings for the Project as follows:
▪ Kickoff meeting with City of Redding at City Hall to reinforce key project objectives, critical milestones, budget, critical success factors, and team roles and responsibilities (assume 4 hours with Project Manager, Design Manager, and four key design team members).
▪ Up to 12 monthly status conference calls or meetings at City Hall between City and JACOBS. JACOBS will prepare monthly agendas and summary minutes, including ongoing work, issues pending, action items, and status of open action items.
▪ One (1) Alternatives Analysis Workshop with the City (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting Leads).
▪ One (1) Preliminary Design Workshop with City and state/federal agencies (assume 4 hours; attended by Project Manager, Design Manager, Environmental, and Permitting leads).

Deliverables: Meeting agendas and meeting minutes.

Subtask 1.3 – Quality Control
The purpose of this subtask is to provide quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) for the Project. Upon completion of the Draft and Pre-Final PDR phases, senior members of the JACOBS team will review design and construction methodology, drawings, calculations, Project design report, and the overall integrity of the design.

Internal reviews by senior engineers using quality review forms (QRFs) will be performed on Draft and Pre-Final PDR deliverables.

Comments received from the quality control reviewers will be reviewed and adjudicated by the design team, with changes and additions incorporated into the design documents prior to delivery to the City.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Task 2 – Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Subtask 2.1 Data Review
JACOBS will review available data, reports, mapping, and geotechnical reports. The following information may include, but not limited to:
▪ CH2M HILL (now JACOBS) prepared the Draft Feasibility Study for the City of Redding Pump House No. 1 Fish Protection Project in February 2002.
▪ Record Documents: JACOBS will review available record documents, including record drawings, technical specifications, design reports, and geotechnical data reports. ▪ Federal, State, and Local Requirements: JACOBS will determine, with assistance from the City, regulatory requirements applicable for the Project. JACOBS will research and document restrictions as they pertain to the proposed Project alternatives.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 4
Subtask 2.2 Geotechnical Investigations
JACOBS will perform geotechnical and geophysical investigations necessary to provide sufficient data for Phase 1.

Geophysical refraction surveys will be performed to provide profiles with well-contrasted changes in seismic velocity that facilitates interpretation of subsurface stratigraphy. The seismic velocity of the rock will evaluate the feasibility of excavation, or excavatability, of the rock and feasibility of driving sheet piles for scour protection and cofferdam construction.

One geophysical refraction survey line is proposed for each Alternative 1 and Alternative 2 (two lines total), but no survey lines will be provided for either Alternative 4 or Alternative 5. The survey reveals subsurface strata to the anticipated excavation depth. Following the completion of the geophysical survey, up to two soil borings will be drilled adjacent to the river trail at the location of the proposed pump station.

The potential for liquefaction will be evaluated from the borehole data, as liquefaction mitigation would significantly contribute to the cost of the alternative. Samples are tested in the laboratory to evaluate their consistency and properties.

Up to two soil borings total will first be drilled at two potential collector well sites. The sites are identified as Area 4 in the 1972 report to the City by Ranney, and an area on the south side of the river near the ACID Fish Screen.

If the soil borings find adequate sands and gravels are present for a potential collector well and the City approves the pumping well site, up to one 12-inch-diameter pumping well will be completed.

Three observation wells would be installed at approximate radial distances between 30 to 150 feet from the pumping/test well at a location approved by the City. These wells would be used to monitor how the water table responds to pumping from the test well. Following development of all the wells, the test well would be pumped for a minimum of 24 hours while observing the response in the monitoring wells. The results of the pumping test will be used to estimate the hydraulic capacity of the proposed collector well site.

Assumptions: The soil boring drilling and geophysical surveys are performed during the course of one working day at each location. The well installation development and testing would be completed during approximately 2 weeks at each location. It is assumed that site access is provided for the geophysical crew and drill rigs. It is assumed that no permits will be needed to perform the geophysical survey. Well permits will be obtained through Shasta County. The geophysical survey and drilling crews will work under the supervision of JACOBS.

Assume that City encroachment permits will be required for borings and City will waive the encroachment permit fees.

Deliverables: A geotechnical data report will be prepared to summarize the field investigation and testing results.

The geologic hazards associated with each alternative will be discussed and a determination will be made of the potential for a future collector well at up to two sites. A geotechnical data report will be incorporated in the PDR.

Subtask 2.3 Surveying and Mapping
Ground surface surveys, both on bank and on the river bottom, will be performed as necessary to complete the preliminary design for Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. Two cross-sections perpendicular to the river will be surveyed at both the Alternatives 1 and 2 sites to determine preliminary facility elevations. Assumes two people

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 5
for one day in the field for this task. No surveying and mapping are included herein for Alternatives 4 and 5 because this information is not required for Phase 1 evaluations.

JACOBS will perform a preliminary right-of-way assessment and identify potential right-of-way issues based on readily available GIS data. Right-of-way surveys will be performed in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the PDR.

Task 3 – Preliminary Environmental Review
The purpose of this task is to evaluate the environmental viability and issues related to each proposed alternative. JACOBS will perform a screening-level review of the biological and cultural impact potential for each site based upon readily available data and technical experience in the Project area. This includes for each site:
▪ One-day reconnaissance level site visit with California Natural Diversity Data Base (CNDDB) and Biogeographic Information and Observation System Database (BIOS) data reviews for any potential endangered or listed species within each Project.
▪ Identification of the likely Area of Potential Effect (APE) and initial review by a JACOBS archaeologist and cultural resources specialist. California Historical Resource Information System (CHRIS) surveys will likely only be completed for the selected alternative in Phase 2. ▪ Review of water rights and evaluation for change in point-of-diversion. ▪ Preliminary delineation of the Ordinary High-Water Mark (OWHM) is performed for an engineering alternatives review. Detailed wetland delineation and permitting is completed in Phase 2 once the Project is defined.
▪ Coordination with National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), California Department of Fish & Wildlife (CDFW), and United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) to determine the preliminary feasibility of each selected alternative.
▪ Gather information related to existing river bank collector well systems adjacent to anadromous waterways in northern California and analyze their permitting and regulatory challenges.

Assumptions:
▪ Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) document will not be completed in Phase

1. LEDPA analysis will be included in Phase 2 if individual permit cannot be avoided from USACE. ▪ California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance is considered for each alternative with assumptions. CEQA and NEPA documents are included in Phase 2.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 4 – Construction Funding Evaluation
The purpose of this task is to provide a list of viable funding alternatives like California State Revolving Fund (SRF) and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (WIFIA) for the project construction and rank them based on likelihood of successful application, associated interest rates, terms, design or construction related requirements, potential impacts to the project schedule, related reporting or monitoring requirements, and other important aspects associated with each funding alternative.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 6
Assumptions:
▪ Up to four funding mechanisms are reviewed and ranked in the PDR. ▪ Applications for funding submission are not included in Phase 1.

Deliverables: No specific deliverables; work products to be incorporated in the Preliminary Design Report.

Task 5 – Preliminary Design Report
The purpose of this task is to provide the City of Redding with a PDR with the preferred alternative for the City to consider for Phase 2 Final Design.

JACOBS will follow a three-phase process for delivery of the preliminary design for the Project. This process includes producing preliminary deliverables at three phases of the design (Draft, Pre-Final, and Final Preliminary Design). At the Draft and Pre-Final phases, JACOBS will provide information for review and provide for resolution of key issues before proceeding to the next phase. The information collected, and the concepts defined in each consecutive phase, will form the basis for subsequent work.

Each phase will include specific deliverables, which are identified in the following subtasks. Design review workshops (at City Hall) with the City of Redding will be conducted at critical design milestones as identified in the following subtasks. The City of Redding will provide comments to JACOBS within 3 weeks of receiving the documents.

Project Design Criteria
The Project design criteria will be developed for evaluating the alternatives and will be included in the PDRs.

Engineering design criteria will address resource agency criteria, structural, civil, geotechnical, mechanical, electrical, conveyance pipeline, cost and financial analysis, and construction elements. Operations criteria will encompass diversion requirements and other operations to maintain water deliveries during construction.

Development and Evaluation of Alternatives and Components Alternatives will be developed in concert with the City. JACOBS anticipates up to four alternatives will be evaluated per the project design criteria. JACOBS will prepare information associated with each alternative to provide information for a project workshop with the City and agencies to ensure consensus of alternatives.

JACOBS will evaluate design criteria and prepare conceptual design documents for the alternatives and components. Conceptual design documents will include approximately three drawings per alternative: site plan, facility layout plan, cross sections, river and screen criteria, construction phasing approach, operations and maintenance (O&M), construction cost estimates, and life-cycle cost will be included in the PDRs.

JACOBS will provide a clearly defined ranking system and rank the four alternatives based on performance, capital and operating costs, environmental impacts, and other factors that should be considered.

Subtask 5.1 – Draft Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Draft Preliminary Design Report to document the information prepared to select the preferred design alterative for the Project.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 7
The Draft PDR will include cost estimates for the remaining phases of the Project, including environmental and permitting, easement acquisition (City to provide land value assumptions), final engineering and design, services during construction (engineering support and construction management), construction, and O&M.

Construction cost estimates will be prepared to the level of accuracy based on the information available within normal industry standards. Estimates will be formatted in accordance with the Project design CSI specification format and segregated by facility. Where sufficient detailed information is lacking to obtain reasonably accurate prices of materials a contingency allowance may be applied. Escalation allowances will be used to provide an opinion of the estimated construction costs at the midpoint of construction.

This report is expected to be a working document at this stage of design.

JACOBS will facilitate a Preliminary Design Workshop with the City and agencies to review the preliminary design and receive input from the City and agencies.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Draft PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Subtask 5.2 – Pre-Final Preliminary Design Report
JACOBS will prepare Pre-Final PDR for the Project. PDR review comments from the City and federal and state agencies will be incorporated. The Pre-Final submittal will include the concept drawings and preliminary construction costs. The PDR will include an estimate for annual operating costs, estimated service life for major components and equipment, and provide a life-cycle cost analysis for each alternative.

The Pre-Final PDR review submittal will recommend a project alternative and is intended to be essentially ready for City of Redding preferred alternative selection. The PDR will document the major design criteria used for the various project components.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of Pre-Final PDR documents and preliminary construction cost estimates.

Subtask 5.3 – Final Preliminary Design Report
This is the final phase of the PDR. Review comments from the Pre-Final PDR from the City of Redding review will be incorporated. JACOBS will prepare the Final PDR, which will be stamped by California Registered Professional Engineers. The Final PDR will include design criteria, to be used as the preliminary basis of design for Phase 2, for the City’s preferred alternative.

Deliverables: Electronic files (pdf format) and five (5) hard copy sets of P.E. stamped PDR documents.

Schedule
The Scope of Engineering Services and activities is anticipated to commence in May 2020 and will be completed no later than March 2021 assuming COVID-19 does not affect field work schedules. The Scope of Engineering Services and activities associated with this Project will be completed in accordance with the following approximate milestones:
▪ Project Authorized and Notice to Proceed by City of Redding– Mid-May 2020 ▪ Complete Draft Preliminary Design – September 2020

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) April 14, 2020
Subject: Scope of Engineering Services to City of Redding (COR) Pump House 1 Replacement Project PPS0402201345RDD 8
▪ Complete Pre-Final Preliminary Design – December 2020 ▪ Complete Final Preliminary Design – March 2021
The Scope of Engineering Services shall be considered complete when final deliverables are deemed acceptable by the City. Efforts will be made by the JACOBS to complete the work in a timely manner. However, it is agreed that the JACOBS cannot be responsible for delays occasioned by factors beyond JACOBS control, or factors which would not reasonably have been foreseen at the time this Scope of Engineering Services was executed.

Budget
The budgetary amount for professional services and expenses are provided in Exhibit B. JACOBS will make reasonable efforts to complete the work within the budget. JACOBS is not obligated to incur costs beyond the indicated budget, as may be adjusted, and the City of Redding is not obligated to pay JACOBS beyond these limits.

The rates as shown in Exhibit B will be escalated for year 2021, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

In the event that a task or subtask is complete and the task or subtask budget is not fully spent, upon City approval, remaining funds may be transferred to other tasks which might require additional budget, while not exceeding the authorized total amount.

Additional Services Not Included
The services described below are not included in this Scope of Engineering Services but can be performed if requested and approved by City and JACOBS. Time, scope, and fee have not been budgeted for the tasks listed hereunder. Authorization to proceed shall be in the form of an amendment to this Scope of Engineering Services specifying the work to be performed and the additional payment for such services rendered. ▪ Additional workshops not listed above
▪ Environmental permitting support exceeding those listed above ▪ Survey and mapping exceeding those listed above
▪ Final engineering and design services
▪ Construction management services
▪ Materials testing or special inspection services
▪ Additional items noted to be excluded within the Scope of Engineering Services If you have any questions or require further information do not hesitate to contact Kimberly Hein at 530.355.8488.

Sincerely,
Lisa Alliger, P.E. Kimberly Hein, P.E.

Manager of Projects Project Manager
cc: Kurt Maire, City of Redding Public Works Engineer

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) Exhibit B
PPS0402201345RDD 1
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding
Consultant Fee
Phase 1 Fee Summary
Task
No. Description Labor Fee
Subcontractor
Fee Expenses Fee
Task 1 Project Management
Task 1.1 Project Management $23,376.00 $0.00 $0.00 $23,376.00 Task 1.2 Meetings $21,148.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $22,148.00 Task 1.3 Quality Control $17,664.00 $0.00 $0.00 $17,664.00 Task 1 Subtotal $62,188.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $63,188.00
Task 2 Data Review, Geotechnical Investigations, and Survey/Mapping Task 2.1 Data Review $14,892.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,892.00
Task 2.2 Geotechnical
Investigations
$41,016.00 $19,541.00 $2,000.00 $62,647.00
Task 2.2 Drilling/Pump Testing $0.00 $135,524.00 $0.00 $135,524.00 Task 2.3 Surveying and Mapping $4,080.00 $7,455.00 $800.00 $12,335.00 Task 2 Subtotal $59,988.00 $162,520.00 $2,800.00 $225,308.00 Task 3 Preliminary Environmental
Review
$44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 3 Subtotal $44,288.00 $0.00 $0.00 $44,288.00
Task 4 Construction Funding
Evaluation
$19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 4 Subtotal $19,576.00 $0.00 $0.00 $19,576.00
Task 5 Preliminary Design Report
(Preliminary, Pre-Final, and
Final PDR)
$136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
Task 5 Subtotal $136,469.00 $0.00 $0.00 $136,469.00
TOTAL PHASE 1 $488,829.00

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement) PPS0402201345RDD 2
Consultant Rates
Engineering Services for the Pump House 1 Replacement Project for the City of Redding 2020 Hourly Billing Rates
Labor Classification
Hourly Billing
Rate
Office/Clerical/Accounting $108
Junior-Level Technician $80
Mid-level Technician $123
Senior-Level Technician $179
Staff Engineer 1 $122
Staff Engineer 2 $133
Associate Engineer $135
Project Engineer $187
Engineer Specialist/Associate Project Manager $204
Senior Technologist/Project Manager $255
Principal Technologist/Senior Project Manager $283
Includes engineering, consulting planner, and scientist disciplines.

Notes:
1) A markup of 5 percent will be applied to all Other Direct Costs and Expenses. 2) Direct expenses are those necessary costs and charges incurred for the PROJECT including, but not limited to:
a) The direct costs of transportation, meals and lodging, mail, subcontracts, outside services, and equipment and supplies.
b) Consultant’s current standard rate charges for direct use of Consultant’s vehicles, laboratory test and analysis, printing and reproduction services, and certain field equipment; and c) Consultant’s standard project charges for special health and safety requirements of Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
3) Consultant’s current standard rates for direct expenses shall be used. These rates are subject to change following internal audits and reviews.
4) These rates are effective January 1, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Rate schedule is subject to annual revision to reflect current rates and not to exceed 4 percent per year for subsequent years of the contract.

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

APPROVED
Packet Pg. 413
Attachment: Previous Staff Report-6/3/25 (4.11(b)--Adopt Resolution to Fund Pump Station 1 Replacement)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Adopt Resolution authorizing the Director of Public Works, or designee, to:
(1) Prepare and file a grant application for approximately $5,000,000 with the State of California Department of Water Resources, and take other actions necessary to obtain grant funding;
(2) Sign and execute all documentation, including a funding agreement and any future amendments; and
(3) Facilitate the grant should it be awarded; and authorize the Director of Public Works, or designee, to submit any required documents to obtain grant funding.

Fiscal Impact
There are no direct costs associated with the adoption of the resolution authorizing the application, acceptance, and execution of the State of California Department of Water Resources Riverine Stewardship Program. The grant does not require matching funds, and all potential costs are anticipated to be covered by grant funds. Costs incurred for work performed in implementing the project, including grant administration and overhead costs directly related to the project are reimbursable.

Alternative Action
The City Council may choose not to adopt the resolution and, therefore, not authorize an application to the Department of Water Resources (DWR). In this case, the City of Redding (City) would not receive state funding to assist in the project.

Background/Analysis
The Livingston Stone National Fish Hatchery (LSNFH) is located at the base of Shasta Dam and operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

MEETING DATE: January 20, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.11(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.11(c)--Adopt Resolution authorizing the Grant Application submittal, acceptance and execution for the State of California Department of Water Resources Riverine Stewardship Program.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager
Packet Pg. 414
Report to Redding City Council January 13, 2026
Re: 4.11(c)--Authorize Grant Application - DWR Riverine Stewardship Program Page 2 In recent years, especially during 2022, the need for permanent chillers and water treatment to provide adequate water temperature and quality for winter-run Chinook Salmon hatchery production has amplified. For purposes of this grant application, only funding for water treatment is being requested. The LSNFH Permanent Water Chillers have been funded through the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) through the BOR. The State of California has grant funding available through its Riverine Stewardship Program to fund the water treatment plant but needs a local government partner (i.e. City of Redding) to disburse the funds.

The LSNFH Permanent Water Chillers and Water Treatment Project (Project) will provide a modern, permanent chiller plant and water treatment plant, which is required to keep water temperatures and quality suitable for Endangered Species Act listed Sacramento River winterrun Chinook Salmon at LSNFH. The project will design, permit, and install two 500-ton chillers with cooling towers for chilling and Ultra Violet Sterilization with medium pressure and automatic backwashing strainer filters for water treatment, and all associated valving, piping and controls, plus site power redundancies.

The Project will be designed, permitted, and constructed as one project by the BOR with two different funding sources. A future agreement between the City and BOR will be developed to define various project elements, coordination, and cost sharing and will be brought before Council for approval before the DWR grant application is submitted.

The Project’s goals are to enhance and improve hatchery production of winter-run Chinook Salmon which in-turn will increase water supply reliability for the City’s Water Utility.

The resolution has been approved to form by the City Attorney.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. Should the City receive grant funding project specific environmental analysis will be conducted in compliance with CEQA and National Environmental Protection Agency.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Resolution
Packet Pg. 415
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-_____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

AUTHORIZING THE GRANT APPLICATION, ACCEPTANCE, AND

EXECUTION FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

WATER RESOURCES RIVERINE STEWARDSHIP PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of Redding proposes to implement the State of California Department of Water Resources Riverine Stewardship Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of Redding has the legal authority and is authorized to enter into a funding agreement with the State of California; and
WHEREAS, the City of Redding intends to apply for grant funding from the California Department of Water Resources for the Riverine Stewardship Program; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Redding as follows:

1. That pursuant and subject to all of the terms and provisions of the Costa-Machado Water Act of 2000 (Wat. Code, § 79000 et seq.), the City of Redding Public Works Director, or designee is hereby authorized and directed to prepare and file an application for funding with the Department of Water Resources, and take such other actions necessary or appropriate to obtain grant funding.

2. The City of Redding Public Works Director, or designee is hereby authorized and directed to execute the funding agreement with the Department of Water Resources and any amendments thereto.

3. The City of Redding Public Works Director, or designee is hereby authorized and directed to submit any required documents, invoices, and reports required to obtain grant funding.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 20th day of January, 2026, and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_______________________________
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM:
____________________________ _______________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: ^Resolution (4.11(c)--Authorize Grant Application - DWR Riverine Stewardship Program)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Approve updates to City of Redding (City) Personnel Policy No. 2021 (Nepotism Policy) to improve clarity and consistency, strengthen disclosure requirements, address romantic relationships, and prevent conflicts of interest, preferential treatment, and improper influence in City employment practices.

Fiscal Impact
There is no impact to the General Fund with the recommended action.

Alternative Action
The City Council could choose not to approve the recommended revisions to the Nepotism Policy and provide alternative direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
The City of Redding’s (City) Nepotism Policy was originally adopted in 1987 to ensure employment decisions are made based on merit and to prevent favoritism, conflicts of interest, or the appearance of improper influence resulting from familial relationships. While the policy has been amended over time, City staff has identified a need to further update and clarify the policy to reflect current organizational practices and evolving workplace standards.

The existing policy does not expressly address romantic relationships between employees, which may present risks related to supervision, influence, and conflicts of interest. Additionally, certain definitions, disclosure requirements, and enforcement provisions would benefit from further clarification to ensure consistent application across all departments.

MEETING DATE: January 20, 2026
ITEM NO. 4.15(a)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy
Leslie Saelee, Personnel
Manager
Packet Pg. 417
Report to Redding City Council January 12, 2026
Re: 4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy Page 2 The proposed revisions are intended to modernize the policy while maintaining the City’s commitment to nondiscrimination and compliance with Government Code section 12940. The revisions clarify key definitions to include registered domestic partners and romantic relationships, provide greater clarity regarding the scope of supervisory and conflicts of interest, and strengthen disclosure requirements for applicants, employees, and supervisors. The revised policy also establishes clear procedures for addressing situations where employees become relatives or enter into romantic relationships after hire. In addition, the revisions preserve existing department-specific exceptions for Police and Fire employees, while reinforcing prohibitions on supervisory relationships to reduce the potential for actual or perceived conflicts of interest.

Overall, the proposed changes are intended to provide clear guidance to staff, reduce ambiguity in enforcement, and protect the City from potential legal, operational, or reputational impacts.

The proposed revisions have been shared with each of the City’s Bargaining Units and no concerns were identified.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decision today.”
Attachments
^COR Nepotism Policy last updated 2021
^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update - REDLINE
^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update
Packet Pg. 418
Revised 5-1-05
Revised 4-1-06
Revised 7-7-20
Revised 2-23-21

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

NEPOTISM POLICY

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
5/1/87 1
Personnel Directo City Manager
Purpose
The purpose of the Nepotism Policy is to establish guidelines in dealing with the issue of employing or promoting persons who are related to City employees or officials. These guidelines shall ensure that hiring and supervision within the City are conducted in a manner which enhances public confidence in the City and prevents situations that have the potential for adverse impact on the City or give the appearance of preferential treatment, improper influence, or conflict of interest.

Definitions
A. For purposes of this Policy, "employee" means any regular full-time or part-time employee. Status "9", part-time temporary employees are exempt from this Policy to the extent that they can work in the same department/division as a relative providing the relative does not supervise them in any capacity.

B. For purposes of this Policy, "relative" means spouse, child, grandchild, brother, sister, parent, or grandparent whether by blood or by marriage.

C. For purposes of this Policy, "supervisor" means any employee, regardless of job description or title, having authority to hire, transfer, promote, discipline, evaluate or regularly assign work to employees or to recommend such action. This includes any person who is in the line of supervision above the employee up to the City Manager.

Policy
A. It is the intent of the City of Redding not to discriminate in its employment and personnel actions with respect to its employees, prospective employees, or applicants on the basis of familial or marital status. Pursuant to Government Code 12940, the City of Redding reserves the right to reasonably regulate for reasons of supervision, safety, security, or morale, the working of spouses and relatives in the same division.

Hiring employees related through familial or marital status is allowed, provided it is not in the same division within a City department. The following exceptions apply:

Redding Police Department
Sworn Police Officers and/or Community Service Officers that are relatives cannot be employed within the same department or division.

Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy last updated 2021 (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy) Revised 5-1-05
Revised 4-1-06
Revised 7-7-20
Revised 2-23-21

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

NEPOTISM POLICY

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
5/1/87 2
Employees hired prior to July 1, 2005, may continue to work in the same division/department as a relative, providing the working relationship is not in violation of other terms or conditions of this policy.

Redding Fire Department
The Redding Fire Department is authorized to allow up to 10 or 10 percent (10%) of its employees, whichever is greater, to be related by familial or marital status. However, department staff related by familial or marital status cannot be assigned as a supervisor of a relative.

B. The City of Redding shall not appoint a person to a position within the City who has a marital or familial relationship with the City Manager, City Attorney, or any member of the City Council.

C. No person shall be appointed, demoted, transferred, or promoted to a position in a department or division in which such person's relative already holds a position where such has the potential for creating a supervisor/subordinate relationship or adversely impacts, safety, security, internal control, morale, or involves a potential conflict of interest.

D. If two City employees become relatives and their respective employee positions involve a supervisory relationship as defined in Section 2. B of this policy or involve a potential for adverse impact or conflict with this policy, the employees' work situations shall not be permitted to continue.

E. The City will first attempt to transfer one employee to another department or division where a conflict with this policy does not exist. If the work situation cannot be rectified through a transfer the City shall take all necessary steps to ensure that those involved in the work situation do not make recommendations or in any way participate in decisions about any personnel matter which may directly affect the selection, appointment, retention, tenure, performance evaluation, compensation, promotion, discipline, termination, or other employment status of each other.

Procedure
A. Employees, who are responsible for making or influencing decisions to extend offers of employment for City employment or to promote employees shall be obligated, by this policy, to disclose the existence of a familial relationship to their supervisor prior to Packet Pg. 420 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy last updated 2021 (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy) Revised
5-1-05
Revised4-1-06
Revised7-7-20
Revised2-23-21

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

NEPOTISM POLICY

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
5/1/87
3 Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy last updated 2021 (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

NEPOTISM POLICY

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
5/1/87 1
Personnel Director ____________________________ City Manager ________________________________ Revised 5-1-05
Revised 4-1-06
Revised 7-7-20
Revised 2-23-21
Purpose
The purpose of the Nepotism Policy is to establish guidelines in dealing with the issue of employing or promoting persons who are related to City employees or officials. These guidelines shall ensure that hiring and supervision within the City are conducted in a manner which enhances public confidence in the City and prevents situations that have the potential for adverse impact on the City or give the appearance of preferential treatment, improper influence, or conflict of interest.

Scope
The Nepotism policy applies to all regular and part-time employees.

Status “9" part-time temporary employees are exempt from this Policy to the extent that they can work in the same department/division as a relative providing the relative does not supervise them in any capacity except as outlined in Section A of the Policy Statement Section B below.

Definitions
A. Relative: For the purpose of this policy, “relative” includes spouse, registered domestic partner, child, grandchild, brother, sister, parent, or grandparent whether by blood or by marriage.

B. Romantic Relationship: Any dating or intimate relationship, whether ongoing or intermittent, is considered a romantic relationship for the purpose of this policy.

C. Supervisory Authority/Supervisor: The authority to make or influence employment decisions regarding hiring, promotion, transfer, discipline, evaluation, scheduling, or other terms and conditions of employment. This includes any person who is in the line of supervision above the employee up to the City Manager.

D. Conflict of Interest: Any actual, perceived or potential conflict of interest in which it reasonably appears that a department employee’s action, inaction or decisions are or may be influenced by the employee’s personal or business relationship.

Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update - REDLINE (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

NEPOTISM POLICY

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
5/1/87 2
Revised 5-1-05
Revised 4-1-06
Revised 7-7-20
Revised 2-23-21
Revised 1-20-26
Policy Statement
It is the policy of the City that no employee or applicant shall be given preferential treatment in hiring, promotion, assignment, transfer, supervision, or any other condition of employment on the basis of a personal or familial relationship.

Definitions
A. For purposes of this Policy, “employee” means any regular full-time or part-time employee. Status “9", part-time temporary employees are exempt from this Policy to the extent that they can work in the same department/division as a relative providing the relative does not supervise them in any capacity.Relative: For the purpose of this policy, “relative” includes spouse, registered domestic partner, child, grandchild, brother, sister, parent, or grandparent whether by blood or by marriage.

B. For purposes of this Policy, “relative” means spouse, child, grandchild, brother, sister, parent, or grandparent whether by blood or by marriage.Romantic Relationship: Any dating or intimate relationship, whether ongoing or intermittent, is considered a romantic relationship for the purpose of this policy.

C. For purposes of this Policy, “supervisor” means any employee, regardless of job description or title, having authority to hire, transfer, promote, discipline, evaluate or regularly assign work to employees or to recommend such action. This includes any person who is in the line of supervision above the employee up to the City Manager.Supervisory Authority/Supervisor: The authority to make or influence employment decisions regarding hiring, promotion, transfer, discipline, evaluation, scheduling, or other terms and conditions of employment. This includes any person who is in the line of supervision above the employee up to the City Manager.

D. Conflict of Interest: Any actual, perceived or potential conflict of interest in which it reasonably appears that a department employee’s action, inaction or decisions are or may be influenced by the employee’s personal or business relationship.

Policy
ItIt is the intent of the City of Redding not to discriminate in its employment and personnel actions with respect to its employees, prospective employees, or applicants on the basis of familial or marital Packet Pg. 423 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update - REDLINE (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

NEPOTISM POLICY

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
5/1/87 3
Revised 5-1-05
Revised 4-1-06
Revised 7-7-20
Revised 2-23-21
Revised 1-20-26
status. Pursuant to Government Code 12940, the City of Redding reserves the right to reasonably regulate for reasons of supervision, safety, security, or morale, the working of spouses and relatives in the same division.

Hiring employees related through familial or marital status is allowed, provided it is not in the same division within a City department. The following exceptions apply:

Redding Police Department
Sworn Police Officers and/or Community Service Officers that are relatives cannot be employed within the same department or division.

Employees hired prior to July 1, 2005, may continue to work in the same division/department as a relative, providing the working relationship is not in violation of other terms or conditions of this policy.

Redding Fire Department
The Redding Fire Department is authorized to allow up to 10 or 10 percent (10%) of its employees, whichever is greater, to be related by familial or marital status. However, department staff related by familial or marital status cannot be assigned as a supervisor of a relative.
• A. B. The City of Redding shall not appoint a person to any position (regular, part time, or temporary) within the City who has a familial, marital, or romantic marital or familial relationship with the City Manager, City Attorney, or any member of the City Council.

B. The Mayor and/or the City Council shall not appoint any person to a board or committee for the City of Redding who has a familial, marital, or romantic relationship with any member of the City Council.

CC. No person shall be appointed, demoted, transferred, or promoted to a position in a department or division in which such person’s relative or romantic partner already holds a position. where such has the potential for creating a supervisor/subordinate relationship or adversely impacts, safety, security, internal control, morale, or involves a potential conflict of interest.

Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update - REDLINE (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

NEPOTISM POLICY

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
5/1/87 4
Revised 5-1-05
Revised 4-1-06
Revised 7-7-20
Revised 2-23-21
Revised 1-20-26
DD. If two City employees become relatives, or form a romantic relationship, and their respective employee positions involve a supervisory relationship as defined in Section

23. A or B of this policy or involve a potential for adverse impact or conflict with this policy, the employees’ work situations shall not be permitted to continue.

E. TThe City will first attempt to transfer one employee to another department or division where a conflict with this policy does not exist. If the work situation cannot be rectified through a transfer, the City shall take all necessary steps to ensure that those involved in the work situation do not in any way participate in decisions about any personnel matter which may directly affect the selection, appointment, retention, tenure, performance evaluation, compensation, promotion, discipline, termination, or other employment status of each other.

Exceptions for Police Department Employees
Sworn Police Officers and/or Community Service Officers that are relatives cannot be employed within the same department or division.

Employees hired prior to July 1, 2005, may continue to work in the same division/department as a relative, providing the working relationship is not in violation of other terms or conditions of this policy.

Exception for Fire Department Employees
The Redding Fire Department is authorized to allow up to 10 or 10 percent (10%) of its employees, whichever is greater, to be related by familial or marital status. However, department staff involved in a familial, martial, or romantic relationship cannot be assigned as a supervisor of the respective employee.
• If circumstances require that such a supervisor-subordinate relationship exist temporarily (e.g. emergency situations), the supervisor shall make every reasonable effort to defer matters pertaining to the involved employee to an uninvolved supervisor. • If a relative or romantic relationship exists within the department and/or division chain of command, the higher-ranking employee shall be recused from all personnel decisions involving the related employee. This includes, but not limited to, participating in, contributing to or recommending promotions, assignments, performance evaluations, transfers, discipline, or other personnel decisions.

Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update - REDLINE (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

NEPOTISM POLICY

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
5/1/87 5
Revised 5-1-05
Revised 4-1-06
Revised 7-7-20
Revised 2-23-21
Revised 1-20-26
• Employees hired prior to July 1, 2005, may continue to work in the same division/department as a relative, providing the working relationship is not in violation of other terms or conditions of this policy.

Procedure
A. Applicant Disclosure: Individuals applying for employment with the City, or current employees applying for a transfer or promotion, shall disclose any relative or romantic relationships at the time of such application.Employees, who are responsible for making or influencing decisions to extend offers of employment for City employment or to promote employees shall be obligated, by this policy, to disclose the existence of a familial relationship to their supervisor prior to taking or making any employment action which would constitute nepotism as defined by this policy. Failure to do so may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment.

B. Employee Disclosure: Employees who are responsible for making or influencing decisions related to hiring, promotion, or any other employment actions shall be obligated, by this policy, to disclose the existence of a familial relationship to their supervisor prior to taking or making any employment action which would constitute nepotism as defined by this policy. Persons who seek positions with the City or employees who seek transfers or promotions shall disclose any family or relative relationships at the time of such application.

C. Responsibility of Hiring Managers: Department Directors and other hiring managers shall be cognizant of and shall enforce the above restrictions in all hiring decisions.

D. Personnel Consultation: The Personnel Director shall be consulted on a case-by-case basis for advice on the implementation of this directive.

E. Inquiry: When a familial, marital, or romantic relationship is identified, the Department Director and Personnel shall determine whether the relationship constitutes a violation of this policy.
a) If no violation exists, no action will be taken beyond documentation. b) If a violation is found, the City will attempt to identify alternate work arrangements (transfer, reassignment, change in supervisory responsibilities, etc.) consistent with applicable labor agreements.

Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update - REDLINE (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy)

CITY OF REDDING, CALIFORNIA

PERSONNEL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SUBJECT

NEPOTISM POLICY

EFFECTIVE
DATE
PAGE
5/1/87 6
Revised 5-1-05
Revised 4-1-06
Revised 7-7-20
Revised 2-23-21
Revised 1-20-26
F. Resolution of Disputes: Disputes over interpretation or enactment of this policy shall be decided by the City Manager. The decision of the City Manager, based upon reviewing the recommendation of the Department Director and/or the Personnel Director and all pertinent information, shall be final and shall not be subject to the grievance procedure, unless the provisions of this policy have not been adhered to.

G. Failure to Disclose: Failure to disclose a known familial, martial, or romantic relationship in accordance with this policy may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. In cases involving a supervisor-subordinate relationship, the higher-level employee bears the primary responsibility to ensure disclosure and to request necessary adjustment to avoid conflicts of interest.

Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update - REDLINE (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy) Policy History: Effective 5.1.87. Revised 5.1.05; 4.1.06; 7.7.20; 2.23.21; and 1.20.26 Lead Department: Personnel
Cross Reference: N/A
1 of 5
Nepotism Policy
Policy #: N/A
Resolution #: TBD
Effective Date: 5.1.87
Type: Personnel
Purpose:

The purpose of the Nepotism Policy is to establish guidelines in dealing with the issue of employing or promoting persons who are related to City employees or officials. These guidelines shall ensure that hiring and supervision within the City are conducted in a manner which enhances public confidence in the City and prevents situations that have the potential for adverse impact on the City or give the appearance of preferential treatment, improper influence, or conflict of interest.

Scope:

The Nepotism policy applies to all regular and part-time employees.

Status “9" part-time temporary employees are exempt from this Policy to the extent that they can work in the same department/division as a relative providing the relative does not supervise them in any capacity except as outlined in Section A of the Policy Statement.

Definitions:

A. Relative: For the purpose of this policy, “relative” includes spouse, registered domestic partner, child, grandchild, brother, sister, parent, or grandparent whether by blood or by marriage.

B. Romantic Relationship: Any dating or intimate relationship, whether ongoing or intermittent, is considered a romantic relationship for the purpose of this policy.

C. Supervisory Authority/Supervisor: The authority to make or influence employment decisions regarding hiring, promotion, transfer, discipline, evaluation, scheduling, or other terms and conditions of employment. This includes any person who is in the line of supervision above the employee up to the City Manager.

D. Conflict of Interest: Any actual, perceived or potential conflict of interest in which it reasonably appears that a department employee’s action, inaction or decisions are or may be influenced by the employee’s personal or business relationship.

Policy Statement:

Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy) Policy History: Effective 5.1.87. Revised 5.1.05; 4.1.06; 7.7.20; 2.23.21; and 1.20.26 Lead Department: Personnel
Cross Reference: N/A
2 of 5
Nepotism Policy
Policy #: N/A
Resolution #: TBD
Effective Date: 5.1.87
Type: Personnel
It is the policy of the City that no employee or applicant shall be given preferential treatment in hiring, promotion, assignment, transfer, supervision, or any other condition of employment on the basis of a personal or familial relationship.

It is the intent of the City of Redding not to discriminate in its employment and personnel actions with respect to its employees, prospective employees, or applicants on the basis of familial or marital status. Pursuant to Government Code 12940, the City of Redding reserves the right to reasonably regulate for reasons of supervision, safety, security, or morale, the working of spouses and relatives in the same division.

Hiring employees related through familial or marital status is allowed, provided it is not in the same division within a City department. The following exceptions apply:

A. The City of Redding shall not appoint a person to any position (regular, part time, or temporary) within the City who has a familial, marital, or romantic relationship with the City Manager, City Attorney, or any member of the City Council.

B. The Mayor and/or the City Council shall not appoint any person to a board or committee for the City of Redding who has a familial, marital, or romantic relationship with any member of the City Council.

C. No person shall be appointed, demoted, transferred, or promoted to a position in a division in which such person’s relative or romantic partner already holds a position.

D. If two City employees become relatives, or form a romantic relationship, and their respective employee positions involve a supervisory relationship as defined in this policy or involve a potential for adverse impact or conflict with this policy, the employees’ work situations shall not be permitted to continue.

The City will first attempt to transfer one employee to another department or division where a conflict with this policy does not exist. If the work situation cannot be rectified through a transfer, the City shall take all necessary steps to ensure that those involved in the work situation do not in any way participate Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy) Policy History: Effective 5.1.87. Revised 5.1.05; 4.1.06; 7.7.20; 2.23.21; and 1.20.26 Lead Department: Personnel
Cross Reference: N/A
3 of 5
Nepotism Policy
Policy #: N/A
Resolution #: TBD
Effective Date: 5.1.87
Type: Personnel
in decisions about any personnel matter which may directly affect the selection, appointment, retention, tenure, performance evaluation, compensation, promotion, discipline, termination, or other employment status of each other.

Exceptions for Police Department Employees
Sworn Police Officers and/or Community Service Officers that are relatives cannot be employed within the same department or division.

Employees hired prior to July 1, 2005, may continue to work in the same division/department as a relative, providing the working relationship is not in violation of other terms or conditions of this policy.

Exception for Fire Department Employees
The Redding Fire Department is authorized to allow up to 10 or 10 percent (10%) of its employees, whichever is greater, to be related by familial or marital status. However, department staff involved in a familial, martial, or romantic relationship cannot be assigned as a supervisor of the respective employee.
• If circumstances require that such a supervisor-subordinate relationship exist temporarily (e.g. emergency situations), the supervisor shall make every reasonable effort to defer matters pertaining to the involved employee to an uninvolved supervisor.
• If a relative or romantic relationship exists within the department and/or division chain of command, the higher-ranking employee shall be recused from all personnel decisions involving the related employee. This includes, but not limited to, participating in, contributing to or recommending promotions, assignments, performance evaluations, transfers, discipline, or other personnel decisions. • Employees hired prior to July 1, 2005, may continue to work in the same division/department as a relative, providing the working relationship is not in violation of other terms or conditions of this policy.

Procedure
Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy) Policy History: Effective 5.1.87. Revised 5.1.05; 4.1.06; 7.7.20; 2.23.21; and 1.20.26 Lead Department: Personnel
Cross Reference: N/A
4 of 5
Nepotism Policy
Policy #: N/A
Resolution #: TBD
Effective Date: 5.1.87
Type: Personnel
A. Applicant Disclosure: Individuals applying for employment with the City, or current employees applying for a transfer or promotion, shall disclose any relative or romantic relationships at the time of such application.

B. Employee Disclosure: Employees who are responsible for making or influencing decisions related to hiring, promotion, or any other employment actions shall be obligated, by this policy, to disclose the existence of a familial relationship to their supervisor prior to taking or making any employment action which would constitute nepotism as defined by this policy.

C. Responsibility of Hiring Managers: Department Directors and hiring managers shall be cognizant of and shall enforce the above restrictions in all hiring decisions.

D. Personnel Consultation: The Personnel Director shall be consulted on a case-by-case basis for advice on the implementation of this directive.

E. Inquiry: When a familial, marital, or romantic relationship is identified, the Department Director and Personnel shall determine whether the relationship constitutes a violation of this policy.

1. If no violation exists, no action will be taken beyond documentation.

2. If a violation is found, the City will attempt to identify alternate work arrangements (transfer, reassignment, change in supervisory responsibilities, etc.) consistent with applicable labor agreements.

F. Resolution of Disputes: Disputes over interpretation or enactment of this policy shall be decided by the City Manager. The decision of the City Manager, based upon reviewing the recommendation of the Department Director and/or the Personnel Director and all pertinent information, shall be final and shall not be subject to the grievance procedure, unless the provisions of this policy have not been adhered to.

G. Failure to Disclose: Failure to disclose a known familial, martial, or romantic relationship in accordance with this policy may result in disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. In cases involving a supervisor-subordinate Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy) Policy History: Effective 5.1.87. Revised 5.1.05; 4.1.06; 7.7.20; 2.23.21; and 1.20.26 Lead Department: Personnel
Cross Reference: N/A
5 of 5
Nepotism Policy
Policy #: N/A
Resolution #: TBD
Effective Date: 5.1.87
Type: Personnel
relationship, the higher-level employee bears the primary responsibility to ensure disclosure and to request necessary adjustment to avoid conflicts of interest.

Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: ^COR Nepotism Policy 2026 Update (4.15(a)--Approval of Updated Nepotism Policy)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Conduct a Public Hearing and, upon conclusion, adopt Resolution approving the City of Redding’s Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2024−25 to 2029−30.

Fiscal Impact
The City of Redding’s (City) Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is not binding, nor is it a formal budget document; therefore, it, alone, does not have direct budget implications. However, the CIP functions as a major reference tool to help in future budgeting decisions.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) may choose not to adopt the CIP as proposed and provide alternative direction to staff. This will render the City out of compliance with the California Government Code and may impact the collection and use of certain funds designated for capital improvement projects.

Background/Analysis
Attached for public review and consideration by the Council is the draft CIP for Fiscal Years (FY) 2024-25 to 2029-30. The CIP is a multi-year schedule of public improvements planned by various City departments. It provides a general prioritization of capital improvements so that the City and the public will be able to determine with greater certainty when projects might move to construction subject to sufficient revenue collection. The draft CIP is representative of the City’s capital improvement needs based on the existing budget, the General Plan, and the individual department master plans. The CIP has several general benefits and functions that include:

MEETING DATE: January 20, 2026
ITEM NO. 6.1
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 6.1--Public Hearing to consider Resolution approving the City of Redding's Capital Improvement Plan for Fiscal Years 2024-25 to 2029-30.

Michael Webb, Public Works
Director/Interim Asst. City
Manager
Packet Pg. 433
Report to Redding City Council January 13, 2026
Re: 6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan Page 2 • Providing a comprehensive look at the City’s projected capital and infrastructure plan; • Assisting in forecasting workload and aiding in project coordination between departments (e.g., avoids paving a street one year and tearing it up the next year for a waterline);
• Assisting in scheduling improvements that require more than one year to construct; • Helping with long-term financial planning;
• Providing a tool for setting priorities and obtaining citizen participation in determining those priorities;
• Being an essential component in meeting the state legal requirements for public accounting of development impact fee funds; and
• Helping to ensure that plans for community facilities are carried out.

On June 10, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed the draft CIP and acted by adopting a finding of consistency with the General Plan pursuant to Sections 65103(c) and 65401 of the Government Code.

The main term for the draft CIP is for FY 2024−25 to FY 2029−30. Additional projects are also identified that are either currently unfunded or are scheduled beyond the FY 2029−30. These additional projects must be funded when needed to provide for anticipated growth based on the City’s General Plan.

The CIP contains projects from the following departments/divisions: Airports, Community Services, Redding Electric Utility, Redding Fire Department, Solid Waste, Storm Drain Utility, Streets, Wastewater Utility, and Water Utility. Combined, the main term of the CIP contains 164 projects, totaling over $718 million. The CIP includes a discussion of current facilities and services, a statement of consistency with the General Plan, and a list of projects with basic descriptions and anticipated funding sources.

Environmental Review
This action is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and no further action is required. As projects advance to the design phase, from the approved CIP, environmental review will be conducted to ensure compliance with CEQA.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality and quantity of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Resolution
Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30
Packet Pg. 434
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING

ADOPTING THE REDDING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR
2024-25 to 2029-30
WHEREAS, a Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) has been prepared which identifies the City’s long-term capital improvement project needs in a comprehensive and consistent format; and WHEREAS, the CIP was prepared in a format and with content that is consistent with the requirements of Government Code section 66002, which establishes requirements for the preparation of a CIP that includes projects subject to development impact fees; and WHEREAS, the CIP was reviewed by the Redding Planning Commission on June 10, 2025, and was approved as consistent with the General Plan pursuant to Government Code section 65103; and
WHEREAS, on January 20, 2026, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing to allow opportunity for public comment on the draft CIP; and
WHEREAS, having satisfied the requirements of law governing preparation, content, general plan consistency, and opportunity for public review, the City Council wishes to adopt said CIP to formalize the document so it can become available for consideration in budgeting, land use planning, and accounting, among other benefits;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Redding does hereby approve and adopt the Redding Capital Improvement Plan for 2024-25 to 2029-30 included herewith as Attachment "A."
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 20th day of January, 2026, and was adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
_______________________________________
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
___
SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: ^Resolution (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) CAPITAL IMPROVEMeNT
plan (cip)


DRAFT
Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT
PLAN
2024-25
TO
2029-30
DRAFT
Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

TABLE OF CONTENTS
A Introduction ......................................................................................................................... A-1 B General Overview
• Division Descriptions................................................................................................ B-1 • Project Summary...................................................................................................... B-6 • Funding Overview by Division ................................................................................ B-12 • Funding Overview by Source ................................................................................. B-17 C Detailed Program Summary
• Airports..................................................................................................................... C-1 • Community Services .............................................................................................. C-10 • Redding Electric Utility ........................................................................................... C-16 • Redding Fire Department……………………………………………………….…….....C-21 • Solid Waste............................................................................................................ C-24 • Storm Drain Utility .................................................................................................. C-28 • Streets.................................................................................................................... C-31 • Wastewater ............................................................................................................ C-41 • Water...................................................................................................................... C-48 • Future/Unfunded Projects....................................................................................... C-59 Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SECTION A

INTRODUCTION
Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

INTRODUCTION
The City of Redding’s 2024-25 to 2029-30 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) is a five-year outlook on anticipated capital projects in the City of Redding. The City is required by Government Code 66002 to prepare and adopt a CIP. This document is used as a tool to help ensure that the City’s short- and long-term capital investments are made in the context of careful consideration of the City’s needs as well as the resources available to fund the related capital projects.

THE CIP AND GOOD PLANNING
In general, all projects have their roots in the City’s General Plan and in a particular department’s master plan or other long-range planning document. For example, the General Plan includes goals and policies related to the City’s wastewater treatment and collection system while the Wastewater Master Plan incorporates this direction, accounts for expected growth and the condition of the existing infrastructure, anticipates revenue, and identifies resulting infrastructure needs. These needs are then rolled into projects, a project delivery schedule is developed and then the projects summarized in the CIP. Section 65103c of the Government Code requires planning agencies to review the CIP for consistency with the General Plan. The Planning Commission reviewed the CIP on June 10, 2025, and found it consistent with the General Plan.

THE CIP AND THE CITY’S 2-YEAR BUDGET AND 10-YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN The budgeting for the City’s
CIP starts with the
development of the City’s 2-
year budget and 10-year
financial plan. This biennial
process includes a
combination of detailed staff
analysis and broad public
involvement. It is during
this process that basic
municipal operational and
specific infrastructure needs
are identified and matched
with revenues generated
from various local, state and
federal funding sources.

This CIP is a projected $718
million plan with revenue
from 45 different sources
that can be grouped into 12
different funding source
categories. A detailed
breakdown of the CIP
funding by funding source
can be found beginning on
page B17 while a summary
by funding source category
is provided on the chart.

PROJECT FUNDING TOTALS

SOURCE FUNDING TOTALS
Airport Fund
10,597,356
General Fund
51,842,052
Grant
251,746,028
Impact Fees
13,782,423
Local Streets and
Roads Fund
34,063,982
PFC
19,783,698
Utility Rates
Park In-Lieu 358,678,000
2,141,503
Park Development
Fund
6,150,000
SRF Loan,
60,000,000
ARPA , 1,287,871
Park Development
Fund & Unknown
Grant, 3,400,000

FUNDING SOURCE

SUMMARY
A-1
Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

TEAM EFFORT IN BUILDING THE CIP
The document is prepared by the Engineering Division in the Public Works Department with input from all Departments in the City. As noted above, many other commissions, community groups and partners have ongoing input into the planning and budget documents that are the foundation of the CIP. The plan includes projects from all areas in the City including, but not limited to, projects that improve the City’s streets, sewer facilities, water facilities, storm drain facilities, airports, and park facilities. The major emphasis in this CIP is rehabilitation and replacement of aging infrastructure in the City’s five rate-funded utilities and streets program. This section contains two charts breaking out the CIP by program and each of the programs by their basic funding sources.

Airports
188,328,184
Community Services
75,606,966
REU
109,133,724
RFD
26,610,000
Solid Waste
13,010,380
Storm Drain
7,858,161
Streets
104,447,829
Wastewater
107,867,990
Water
170,063,551

DEPARTMENT FUNDING TOTALS
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Airports
Community Services
REU
RFD
Solid Waste
Storm Drain
Streets
Wastewater
Water

FUNDING TYPE BY DIVISION
Airport Fund
General Fund
Grant
Impact Fees
Local Streets and Roads Fund
PFC
Utility Rates
Park In-Lieu
Park Development Fund
A-2
Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CIP ORGANIZATION
The document includes a general overview followed by detailed program-by-program summaries of the entire plan.

Section B - General Overview
The general overview includes an overview of each City division contributing to the CIP, followed by a division by division summary of all projects with projected project costs (project development plus construction) and anticipated year of construction and concluding with a detailed overview of the various funding sources. The City’s CIP includes 164 projects with a projected funding need of $718 million. The funding for the five-year CIP consists of local, state and federal funding from 45 different funding sources.

Section C - Detailed Program Summaries
The detailed program summary includes an overview of the program including project by project summaries. These summaries include project descriptions, locations, funding sources, and anticipated schedule for when project development and construction funds will be needed.

Funding Legend
ATP – Active Transportation Program
CDBG – Community Development Block Grant
HBP – Local Highway Bridge Program
HSIP – Highway Safety Improvement Program
PFC – Passenger Facility Charge
SRTS – Safe Routes to School
STIP – State Transportation Improvement Program
PFC – Airport Passenger Facility Charge
RRA – City of Redding as Successor Agency for the Redding Redevelopment Agency A-3
Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SECTION B

GENERAL OVERVIEW
Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

AIRPORTS
The City of Redding owns and operates two airports within City limits: Redding Regional Airport (RDD) and Benton Field (O85). The Redding Regional Airport, located in the southeast portion of the City, is listed in the National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) as a non-hub primary airport based on the availability of scheduled commercial air service and passenger enplanement levels. Benton Field, located close to Downtown Redding at Placer Street and Airpark Drive, is included in NPIAS non-primary general aviation airport home to a variety of local aviation users, both private and commercial. Both facilities are primarily funded by the Airport Enterprise Fund and receive federal and state assistance in the form of capital improvement grants for infrastructure development and replacement. The availability of convenient air transportation for residents and businesses is an asset to the community and a significant force multiplier for the local economy; in 2021 the Airports Division commissioned an economic contribution assessment which determined that for each dollar invested in airport capital improvements the Airport generated $325 of economic output.

The City of Redding Airports Division is finalizing a new Airport Master Plan (AMP) for RDD to replace the existing master plan which was most recently updated in 2018. The new AMP will address changes to the 20-year outlook for RDD based on an inventory of current infrastructure, FAA-approved passenger enplanement forecasts, and proposed development alternatives. The City of Redding Airports Division annually prepares an Airport Capital Improvement Plan (ACIP) for submittal to the FAA which includes a 6-year outlook of capital improvement projects for which Airport Improvement Plan entitlement and discretionary, or other available federal funding sources, may be requested to assist in developing a given project. The Airport prepared its most recent ACIP for RDD on December 12, 2024 and the projects presented have been included with the same detail in this City of Redding Capital Improvement Plan.

Development and improvements at Benton Field are guided by the 2005 Benton Airpark AMP. The City of Redding Airports Division prepared the current Benton Field ACIP on October 21, 2024. In addition to FAA grants, Benton Field is also eligible to receive some forms of funding from State grants through the California Department of Transportation, these include annual credits, state AIP-matching grants, and airport loans.

In addition to submitting ACIP information to the FAA, the Airports Division includes all current and anticipated federally funded infrastructure projects in the California Department of Transportation Capital Improvement Plan. While projects at RDD are not eligible for state funding, inclusion in the Caltrans CIP ensures that the City of Redding meets its obligations as an airport sponsor and that projects at Benton Field remain eligible for financial assistance from state programs.

General Plan Consistency: The projects planned for both airports are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which promote the maintenance and enhancement of our airports to provide convenient airport service for the community and strive to minimize any adverse impacts resulting from aircraft operations or airport expansion. Reference: Goals CDD2, EJ6, PF11, and T9; Policies CDD2E, PF11B, PF11C, T9A.

COMMUNITY SERVICES
The Community Services Department oversees all the programming within the park system and the B-1
Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) development, expansion, and enhancement of the park, trail, and open-space amenities. Currently, the City of Redding owns and operates a complete range of park and recreation facilities that include 71 park sites on over 667 acres of land. The park system includes the smallest of neighborhood parks, large regional parks, state-of-the-art athletic facilities, and special-use facilities, e.g., boat ramps and a dog park. The Department maintains over 47 miles of trails throughout the city. The trail system has been recognized by federal and state agencies as a model. The core of the trail system is the Sacramento River Trail with many connecting trails and public open spaces.

Several large grant and Park Development-funded projects have been completed in the last few years. Attention to these two categories will continue to be the priority, with grants acting to supplement leveraged Park Development funds. The department has agreements to build phase two projects at Shastina Ranch and Salt Creek Heights parks, which are Park Development projects that will be constructed as homes are built and funding accumulates. There are several combination projects as well, including South City Park and Panorama Park, for which grants will fund the bulk of the effort with Park Development acting as a matching source.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed park and recreation projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies which promote the improvement of park and recreation facilities Citywide. Reference: Goals EJ6, R2, R5, and R9-R13; Policies (all policies listed under the noted goals).

PUBLIC SAFETY
Police Department. The Redding Police Department has the primary responsibility of providing police protection and emergency-service response within the City limits. A mutual aid agreement is in effect with agencies on a statewide basis. The Redding Police Department has three main divisions – Administrative Services, Field Operations, and Investigations. Officers are assigned to seven beats throughout the City and are dispatched to calls via radio and mobile data computer.

There are currently no planned 5-year capital improvements for the Police Department Fire Department. The Redding Fire Department has the primary responsibility of providing fire protection and emergency-service response within the City limits. A mutual aid agreement is in effect with California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CDF) during the wildland fire season for wildland and structure fires within a one-mile fringe area surrounding the City. An automatic aid agreement with the Shasta County Fire Department is also in effect for structure fires outside the wildland fire season. Under these agreements, the Redding Fire Department responds within a onemile fringe area surrounding the City and to county islands. Shasta County Fire Department responds to a small geographic area on the east side of the City. The Redding Fire Department has three main divisions: Administration, Operations, and Fire Prevention. It operates from eight stations and a Fire Headquarters at City Hall. There are currently no planned 5-year capital improvement needs for the Fire Department.

REDDING ELECTRIC UTILITY
As a municipal corporation in California, the City of Redding owns, operates, and maintains its own power generation, transmission, and distribution infrastructure within the City limits. In line with its investment in these facilities and its commitment to delivering electricity at the lowest possible cost, The City has historically maintained a policy of being the exclusive electric service provider within B-2
Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) the City limits. When new areas are annexed, electric service from the City is extended either by acquiring PG&E facilities or by logically expanding the City's existing electric distribution system.

Redding Electric Utility (REU) currently serves customers across 61-square miles, with approximately 72 miles of 115-kV transmission lines and 762 miles of overhead and underground 12-kV distribution lines. REU is proud of its record over the past five years of 99.9996 percent electric service reliability.

To address evolving state regulations related to wildfire prevention and the growth of distributed energy installations, the Electric Utility continues to adapt through the following measures:

Distribution System Hardening: Continue with implementation measures detailed in the 2024 REU Wildfire Mitigation Plan.

Operational Efficiency Enhancement: Utilizing an Outage Management System and workforce management tools to swiftly identify, track, and restore outages, ensuring minimal disruptions.

Technology Improvements: Continue to implement communication and system upgrades related to the communication network to provide real-time data to Operations & Engineering, including customer usage, circuit load, and system voltage information for identifying system bottlenecks.

The City of Redding filed its second comprehensive Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) with the California Energy Commission (CEC) in 2024 as required by state regulation, and will update the plan at least every five years as required. The IRP is a guidance document outlining the utility’s plan for meeting clean energy mandates and customer resource needs over the next 20 years, system upgrades needed to support load growth, managing load impacts from increased electrification adoption, and provides a framework for future resource procurements needed to support customer demands.

California Senate Bill 901, enacted in 2018, requires electric utilities with overhead infrastructure in high fire threat areas to implement wildfire mitigation plans (WMPs), as outlined in Public Utilities Code §8387(b)(2). REU launched its first WMP program in May 2019, followed by three more programs in December 2019. Annual Monitoring & Auditing Reports and WMP updates were approved in 2020, 2021, and 2022, with the 2023 WMP incorporating recommendations from the Wildfire Safety Advisory Board and an independent audit by Dudek. The 2024 WMP includes minor updates, completed capital projects, revised target dates, and enhanced system protection settings to reduce wildfire risk.

As California increases efforts to reduce carbon emissions through building and transportation electrification, the City has started implementing policies and procedures to support related infrastructure. To ensure reliable energy delivery, it will assess the need to expand its electric transmission and distribution systems through transmission assessments and distribution planning studies. In addition to securing a mix of short-and long-term power purchase contracts, the City also owns and operates 183 MW of gas-fired generation within the City limits.

General Plan Consistency. The projects planned for the Electric Utility are consistent with the General Plan’s goals, objectives, and policies, which promote programs that provide safe, reliable, and competitively priced electricity for existing and future City electric customers. Reference: REU’s 2021 Strategic Plan, 2024 Integrated Resource Plan, 2024 Wildfire Mitigation Plan; Goal CDD18, B-3
Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) EJ6 and PF6; Policies CDD18A, CDD18B, CDD18C, PF6A – PF6E, and PF6H.

SOLID WASTE
Solid waste generated in the City is disposed of at Shasta County's Richard W. Curry/West Central Sanitary Landfill. Under existing state permits, the landfill has sufficient capacity to accommodate the disposal of solid waste at least to the year 2030. Expansion of the facility also appears to be plausible at such time as increased capacity is warranted beyond the extent of existing permits.

Although Shasta County owns the Richard W. Curry Landfill, it has contracted with the City of Redding for the operation and management of the facility. This arrangement was formalized in 1988. All residential, commercial, and industrial refuse in Redding is collected by City personnel.

Since 1995, the City has operated its own Solid Waste Transfer Station for the transfer of Citycollected residential, commercial, and industrial refuse and the transfer of self-haul public refuse.

The facility also has the capability of processing materials collected by curbside recycling programs and contains a household hazardous waste drop-off/processing area and a composting area.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed solid waste projects are consistent with the Solid Waste Facility Master Plan and the City’s General Plan goals, objectives, and policies, which promote the efficient collection and disposal of solid waste, while maintaining an adequate waste-disposal capacity. Reference: Goals CDD2, EJ6 and PF7; Policies CDD2E, PF7A, PF7C, PF7G, and PF7H.

STORM DRAINS

The Redding Planning Area contains 15 watershed basins. Public storm-drainage facilities within the City limits are operated and maintained by the City. Surrounding unincorporated areas are the responsibility of the County of Shasta. As new areas are annexed, the City assumes responsibility for storm-water management.

The City currently has a range of public and private storm-drain facilities to provide safe and efficient capture and conveyance of storm-water runoff and minimize the risks of flooding. Storm-drain facilities include more than 200 miles of storm drain pipe, over 7,000 inlets, 1,300 outfalls and 200 miles of open channel. These systems typically outfall into natural ravines or tributaries and ultimately to the Sacramento River.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed storm-drainage projects are consistent with the General Plan’s goals, objectives, and policies, which promote efforts to reduce flooding and to properly manage storm-water runoff from development. Reference: Goals CDD2, CDD4, PF1, PF8, and PS2; Policies CDD2E, PF1I, PF8A, PF8B, PF8E, and PS2F.

STREETS
Redding is both defined and constrained by its network of highways, roads, trails, railroads, and transit services that move its residents and goods in, through, and out of the community. The City is responsible for ensuring the construction and maintenance of all public streets, sidewalks, bridges, bikeways, traffic signals, and street signage within the City limits. The City also maintains a variety of Caltrans facilities consistent with the terms of various cooperative agreements. Developers are either partially or totally responsible for new street construction depending on the type and location B-4
Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) of the project. The City uses public funds to build or improve major streets when the improvements were not constructed as part of a land development project.

General Plan Consistency: The projects planned for streets are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which promote the development and maintenance of a safe and efficient public-street and bicycle-route system. Reference: Goal T1, T2, T5, T6, T8, PF10; Policies T1A, T1B, T1D, T1E, T1H, T1I, T1J, T1K, T2A, T5A, T6B, T6D, T8A, T8B, PF10A, PF10B, PF10C.

BUILDING MAINTENANCE
The Building Maintenance Division is responsible for many internal City functions including the maintenance and repair of the City's facilities such as City Hall, the Corporation Yard and the multiple Redding Fire Stations to name a few. There are currently no planned 5-year capital improvements for the division.

WASTEWATER
The City of Redding is the sole provider of wastewater service within the City limits. The wastewater system has two major service areas, one served by the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant and the other served by the Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant. Facilities include: the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, initially constructed in 1966, which currently has a design capacity of 9.4 million gallons per day (mgd) average dry weather flow and 40 mgd peak wet weather flow; the Stillwater Treatment Plant, put into service in 1992, which has a design capacity of

3.4 mgd average dry weather flow and 14.4 mgd peak wet weather flow; and the wastewater collection system, which has approximately 445 miles of sewer mains, 18 lift stations, and over 8,250 manholes. The wastewater system serves nearly all developed property within the City, plus a few small developments in the surrounding unincorporated area. The City provides service to more than 43,000 household equivalents. One household equivalent is the average amount of wastewater produced by an average single-family residence, which is about 240 gallons per day.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed wastewater projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies which support efforts to achieve and maintain an adequate level of service in the City's sewage collection and treatment system as needed to meet existing and future needs. Reference: Goals CDD2, CDD18, EJ6, PF1, PF5, and NR9; Policies CDD2E, CDD18D, EJ6B, PF1I, PF1J, and PF5A – PF5D.

WATER
The City provides water for domestic and fire-suppression uses to most of the City and to small portions of the surrounding unincorporated area. The water system is supplied by two treatment plants and well fields. Facilities include: the Foothill Treatment Plant, which has a capacity of 28 million gallons per day (mgd); the Buckeye Treatment Plant, which has a capacity of 14.0 mgd; the Enterprise and Cascade well systems, which have a capacity of 19.1 mgd; and the City's water distribution system, which has approximately 560 miles of water mains. The water system serves about 83 percent of the current population of Redding and about 1,800 residents in the surrounding unincorporated area. The water utility provides service to approximately 30,000 households.

General Plan Consistency: The proposed water projects are consistent with the General Plan's goals, objectives, and policies, which support efforts to maintain an adequate level of service in the B-5
Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) City's water treatment and distribution system as needed to meet existing and future needs.

Reference: Goals CDD2, CDD18, EJ6, PF1, PF4, NR2 and NR9; Policies CDD2E, CDD18D, EJ6B, PF1I, PF1J, and PF4A - PF4C.

B-6
Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Airports
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
A-BEN-26-1 Eastside T-Hangar Taxilane Reconstruction 2026-27 $3,940,000 C-1 A-BEN-26-2 Benton Field Vehicle Gate Replacement 2026-27 $36,000 C-1 A-BEN-27-1 Underground Powerline RPZ 2027-28 $547,051 C-1 A-BEN-27-2 Security Fencing - North RPZ 2027-28 $357,001 C-2 A-BEN-27-3 Benton Field West Side Open Hangar Pavement Rehabilitation 2027-28 $100,000 C-2 A-BEN-28-1 Open Hangar Replacements 2028-29 $2,700,000 C-2 A-BEN-28-2 Sun Shade Hangar Replacement 2028-29 $1,800,000 C-3 A-BEN-28-3 New Hangar Development 2028-29 $3,500,000 C-3 A-BEN-28-4 FBO HVAC Replacement 2028-29 $40,000 C-3
A-BEN-28-5 CHP Hangar HVAC Replacement 2028-29 $18,000 C-4 A-BEN-28-6 Cardan Hangar Swamp Coolers 2028-29 $15,000 C-4 A-BEN-28-7 Cardan Hangar Row Roof Replacement 2028-29 $70,000 C-4 A-BEN-28-8 Cameras at Access Control Gates 2028-29 $50,100 C-5 A-BEN-29-1 Northeast Apron and Taxilanes Reconstruction 2029-30 $3,075,170 C-5 A-BEN-29-2 Airport Pavement Management Study 2029-30 $52,501 C-5 A-MUN-22-14 Sureveillance Cameras 2024-25 $51,789 C-6
A-MUN-22-2 Terminal Assessment Study 2024-25 $239,315 C-6 A-MUN-22-8 Master Plan Update 2024-25 $476,990 C-6
A-MUN-23-2 Passenger Terminal Public Parking Design/Construction 2025-26 $1,548,057 C-7 A-MUN-23-6 PHI Hangar Roof 2024-25 $135,000 C-7
A-MUN-24-1 Runway 16-34, 12-30 and Taxiway Connectors - Phase I, II, & III
2024-25 $30,218,805 C-7
A-MUN-26-2 Acquire Snow Removal Equipment Attachments 2026-27 $40,000 C-8 A-MUN-27-1 Runway 16-34 Safety Area Improvements 2028-29 $14,797,231 C-8 A-MUN-28-1 Taxiway Connector Reconstruction and Electrical Improvements
2029-30 $29,498,676 C-8
A-MUN-29-1 Wildlife Hazard Assessment 2029-30 $175,010 C-9 $93,481,697
B-7
Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Community Services
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
CS-2005-21 Shastina Ranch Park & Trail Development 2024-25 $1,800,000 C-10 CS-2011-01 Salt Creek Heights Park 2024-25 $1,620,000 C-10 CS-2019-01 California Soccer Park 2024-25 $20,000 C-10
CS-2021-01 Caldwell Park Expansion Project 2024-25 $4,936,000 C-11 CS-2022-01 Panorama Park 2025-26 $26,000,000 C-11
CS-2022-02 MLK JR. Center & Park 2027-28 $3,985,000 C-11 CS-2022-03 South City Park 2024-25 $7,000,000 C-12
CS-2024-01 Stress Ribbon Bridge Art Project 2024-25 $493,960 C-12 CS-2024-02 Turtle Bay Boat Ramp 2024-25 $4,198,268 C-12 CS-2024-04 Burney Library Infrastructure Grant 2024-25 $449,442 C-13 CS-2024-05 Redding Library Infrastructure Grant 2024-25 $1,562,876 C-13 CS-2024-06 Anderson Library Infrastructure Grant 2024-25 $415,993 C-13 CS-2024-07 Jenny Creek 2024-25 $2,125,427 C-14
CS-2024-12 Redding Aquatic Center Improvements 2024-25 $150,000 C-14 CS-2025-01 Overlook Project 2024-25 $1,250,000 C-14
CS-2025-02 Redding Sports Park 2024-25 $10,100,000 C-15 CS-2025-03 The Peaks Subdivision Park 2024-25 $3,400,000 C-15 CS-2025-04 Oregon Gulch Trails 2025-26 $6,100,000 C-17
$75,606,966
REU
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
REU-2017-15 Redding Power Substation Controls Modernization 2024-25 $99,360 C-16 REU-2019-02 Unit 5 Breaker Replacement 2024-25 $349,901 C-16 REU-2019-09 Energy Trading Modernization 2024-25 $78,980 C-16 REU-2021-01 General System Improvements Ongoing $50,435,182 C-17 REU-2021-04 Future Revenue Funded Capital Projects Ongoing $38,402,000 C-17 REU-2021-05 Fire Protection Monitoring System 2024-25 $62,827 C-17 REU-2022-01 Stillwater Substation 2024-25 $372,114 C-18 REU-2023-02 Workforce Management System 2024-25 $288,211 C-18 REU-2024-01 Power Plant Cathodic Protection System 2024-25 $120,000 C-18 REU-2024-02 Power Plant Administration Building 2024-25 $2,954,257 C-19 REU-2024-03 Overhead/Underground Replacement 2024-25 $12,440,949 C-19 REU-2024-04 Substation Security Upgrades 2024-25 $2,454,943 C-19 REU-2024-05 Substation Circuit Switcher Replacement 2024-25 $500,000 C-20 REU-2025-01 Whiskeytown Unit 9 FERC Relicensing 2024-25 $575,000 C-20 $109,133,724
B-8
Packet Pg. 451 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
RFD
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
RFD-2024-01 Fire Station 1 BC Quarters Plumbing 2025-26 $40,000 C-21 RFD-2024-02 SCBA Replacement 2025-26 $1,500,000 C-21
RFD-2025-02 Fire Station 2 Upgrades 2029-30 $6,000,000 C-21 RFD-2025-03 Fire Station 3 Rebuild 2027-28 $7,000,000 C-22 RFD-2025-04 Fire Station 4 Upgrades 2027-28 $6,000,000 C-22 RFD-2025-06 Fire Station 6 Upgrages 2028-29 $6,000,000 C-22 RFD-2026-09 Fire Station 2 & 4 Kitchen and Floor Replacement 2025-26 $70,000 C-23 $26,610,000
Solid Waste
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
SW-2026-01 West Side Hauling Yard 2026-27 $3,360,000 C-24 SW-2026-02 MRF Tipping Building Expansion 2026-27 $2,100,000 C-24 SW-2026-03 Pit Area Lift Station Retrofit 2026-27 $500,000 C-24 SW-2026-05 Transfer Station Gate Repair 2026-27 $100,000 C-25 SW-2029-01 Organics Pre-Processing Expansion 2026-27 $1,540,000 C-25 SW-4941-01 Transfer Station Tipping Floor 2025-26 $600,000 C-25 SW-4941-02 Transfer Facility Resurface Asphalt Ongoing $850,000 C-26 SW-4941-03 Slurry Seal 2024-25 $152,000 C-26
SW-4941-06 Crane Repairs 2024-25 $282,000 C-26
SW-4941-13 Materials Recovery Facility Expansion 2026-27 $3,200,000 C-27 SW-4941-14 Marshalling Room Remodel 2027-28 $250,000 C-27 $12,934,000
Storm Drain
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
FINANC23002 Emergency Repairs - Bonnyview 2024-25 $3,750,000 C-28 SD-2025-01 Storm Drain Replacement Ongoing $2,710,500 C-28 SDADM23001 ARPA - Strom Drain Upgrades 2024-25 $1,287,871 C-28 SDADM23005 Full Trash Capture Project Pilot 2024-25 $109,790 C-29 $7,858,161
B-9
Packet Pg. 452 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Streets
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
HCOMD23024 Liberty Street Sidewalk 2024-25 $794,575 C-30 PWENG23003 Canyon Road Bridge over ACID Canal 2025-26 $2,061,781 C-30 PWENG23004 Turtle Bay to Downtown 2025-26 $6,550,000 C-30 PWENG23005 Bridge Maintenance Program Ongoing $816,160 C-31 PWENG23006 Systemic Left Turns 2024-25 $1,187,113 C-31
PWENG23007 Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting 2024-25 $737,554 C-31 PWENG23009 Victor & Cypress ATP (VCAT) 2025-26 $8,983,000 C-32 PWENG23011 Old Oregon Trail Widening 2024-25 $2,733,178 C-32 PWENG23012 Old Alturas Road Bridge over Churn Creek 2024-25 $5,227,500 C-32 PWENG23013 Girvan Road Bridge over Olney Creek 2026-27 $2,455,000 C-33 PWENG23014 Westside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow 2025-26 $3,452,670 C-33 PWENG23015 Eastside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow 2026-27 $3,865,000 C-33 PWENG23016 Eastside Road Bridge over Olney Creek 2024-25 $4,655,676 C-34 PWENG23017 Sacramento Drive Bridge over Olney Creek 2027-28 $3,780,810 C-34 PWENG23020 Airport Corridor Phase II 2025-26 $1,918,350 C-34 PWENG23024 Churn Creek/Rancho/Victor Roundabout 2025-26 $4,550,000 C-35 PWENG23025 Stillwater Business Park - Phase II 2025-26 $9,542,052 C-35 PWENG23030 California St Bikeway Project 2024-25 $4,346,701 C-35 PWENG23032 Traffic Signal Modification 2024-25 $52,691 C-36 PWENG23034 Old Alturas Road Improvements 2024-25 $1,002,416 C-36 PWENG23035 Shasta View North 2025-26 $1,122,838 C-36
PWENG23036 Butte Street Boogie 2027-28 $6,380,958 C-37
PWENG23037 Victor Improvement Project 2027-28 $8,975,000 C-37 PWENG23039 Eastside RRX 2026-27 $110,000 C-37
PWENG23041 Oregon Street Sidewalk 2024-25 $1,395,219 C-38 PWENG23042 Calaboose Creek Core Revilatization 2026-27 $2,430,595 C-38 PWENG23044 RR Ave Corridor 2025-26 $58,645 C-38
ST-4226-08 Canby Road Widening 2026-27 $300,000 C-39
ST-4638-15 ADA Curb Ramps Ongoing $825,000 C-39
STADM23012 Traffic Calming Ongoing $1,500,000 C-39
STADM23014 Pavement Maintenance Ongoing $28,000,000 C-40 STADM23016 Sidewalk Replacement Ongoing $1,500,000 C-40 ST-NRTBD-01 Oasis Road Specific Plan Update 2026-27 $50,000 C-40 $121,360,480
B-10
Packet Pg. 453 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Wastewater
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
WSADM23002 Biosolids Pyrolysis - Phase III/IV 2025-26 $17,537,605 C-41 WSADM23006 Canter Court Siphon 2025-26 $896,053 C-41
WSADM23008 Clarifier Rehab 2025-26 $519,850 C-41
WSADM23015 Magnums Remote Lining 2026-27 $3,554,226 C-42 WSADM23017 Oasis Rd Replacement 2026-27 $1,050,000 C-42 WSADM23020 SWWTP Sludge Lagoons & Drying Beds 2024-25 $5,046,249 C-42 WSADM23021 Trinity Street Sewer 2024-25 $860,217 C-43
WSADM23023 Bisulfite Project 2024-25 $275,880 C-43
WSADM23024 Westside Interceptor - Phase III 2025-26 $15,313,444 C-43 WSADM23031 Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Ongoing $4,599,495 C-44 WSADM23032 Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant Ongoing $2,839,439 C-44 WSADM23035 Infiltration and Inflow Control Ongoing $10,907,556 C-44 WSADM23037 Lift Station Improvements Ongoing $1,777,848 C-45 WSADM23038 Lake Redding Interceptor I 2025-26 $5,331,026 C-45 WSADM23040 Co-Digestion & Bio-Gas Production 2025-26 $12,600,000 C-45 WSADM23045 Rancho Lift Station 2024-25 $494,622 C-46
WSADM23048 Magnolia Sewer Repair Phase II 2026-27 $13,100,000 C-46 WSADM23049 Parkview Sewer Siphon 2024-25 $1,164,480 C-46 WW-CS-26-01 Stillwater Business Park Sewer 2025-26 $3,000,000 C-47 WW-P-CC-01 Lake Redding Interceptor II 2027-28 $6,000,000 C-47 WW-TP-C-06 Influent Screening 2025-26 $1,000,000 C-47
$107,867,990
B-11
Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Project Summary
Water
Project Title
Anticipated
Construction
Date
Total Costs
During Current
Project No. CIP Timeframe
Project
Detail
Page
WAADM23004 Athens Area Water Main 2024-25 $1,239,098 C-48 WAADM23006 Cypress Booster Pump Station 2024-25 $3,501,829 C-48 WAADM23008 EW 12 Wellhead Treatment 2024-25 $5,649,918 C-48 WAADM23010 Forest Hills - Cascade Racquet Water Main 2024-25 $1,422,867 C-49 WAADM23011 Hill 900 Reservoir 2027-28 $6,205,150 C-49
WAADM23012 Lake Boulevard 24" - Keswick to Masonic 2024-25 $562,167 C-49 WAADM23016 North Willis Area Water Line Replacement 2025-26 $7,101,392 C-50 WAADM23018 Water Main Improvement 2024 2024-25 $3,851,967 C-50 WAADM23019 Foothill Water Treatment Plant Maintenance Ongoing $2,548,950 C-50 WAADM23022 Electrical Control System Upgrades Ongoing $870,815 C-51 WAADM23026 Buckeye Water Treatment Plant Maintenance Ongoing $1,713,044 C-51 WAADM23040 Old Alturas Road 2024-25 $54,438 C-51
WAADM23042 Pump Station Improvements Ongoing $1,714,953 C-52 WAADM23048 Country Oaks Water Main 2025-26 $3,173,836 C-52 WAADM23049 Buckeye Filter Repair 2024-25 $1,119,256 C-52 WAADM23050 Keswick Valve Upgrades 2027-28 $1,500,000 C-53 WAADM23051 Canyon Bridge Water Line Replacement 2025-26 $112,500 C-53 WAADM23053 South Street Water Line Replacement 2025-26 $1,365,886 C-53 WAADM23054 Foothill Control Building 2026-27 $5,000,000 C-54 W-CONV-01 Hill 900 to Placer 2026-27 $2,000,000 C-54
W-CONV-02 North Willis Area Water Line Replacement - Phase II 2026-27 $5,000,000 C-54 W-CONV-03 Pump House 1 Replacement 2026-27 $71,089,562 C-55 W-CONV-04 Ranchettes 12" Water Main 2026-27 $1,500,000 C-55 W-CONV-05 Foothill WTP Floc Basins & PH2 2029-30 $16,250,000 C-55 W-CONV-06 Fig Tree Well 2027-28 $4,300,000 C-56
W-CONV-07 Pump Station 3 Upgrades 2026-27 $1,000,000 C-56 W-CONV-08 Linden Pump Station 2028-29 $2,250,000 C-56
W-CONV-09 Railroad Booster Pump Station 2026-27 $500,000 C-57 W-CONV-10 S Bonnyview Pump Station Upgrades 2027-28 $1,300,000 C-57 W-CONV-11 Buckeye 2MG Reservoir 2028-29 $5,000,000 C-57 W-CONV-12 Stillwater Business Park Water Main 2025-26 $2,300,000 C-58 W-CONV-13 Cascade Slip Line 12" Water Main 2027-28 $1,400,000 C-58 W-CONV-14 Benton 16" Water Main 2027-28 $500,000 C-58
W-CONV-15 West/Court 12" Water Main 2028-29 $700,000 C-59 $163,797,628
B-12
Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
Airports
Potential Funding Sources 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Airport Fund $219,790 $1,834,251 $9,766 $8,360,581 $22,817 $150,150 $10,597,356 Federal FAA Grant $221,604 $29,230,479 $1,275,405 $5,841,375 $12,890,758 $27,388,500 $76,848,121 PFC $22,830 $1,569,568 $57,362 $186,676 $1,291,255 $2,568,500 $5,696,191 State Aviation Grant $0 $17,434 $0 $181,894 $17,851 $122,850 $340,029 $464,224 $32,651,733 $1,342,533 $14,570,526 $14,222,681 $30,230,000 $93,481,697 Total B-13
Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
Community Services
Potential Funding Sources 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total ARPA Grant $65,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000
CDFA Grant $0 $0 $5,000,000 $4,250,000 $0 $0 $9,250,000 Clean CA Grant $0 $50,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000 Community Foundation of the
North State
$493,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $493,960
EHCRP Grant $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000 General Fund $511,503 $650,000 $4,670,000 $6,500,000 $5,000,000 $0 $17,331,503 ORLP Grant $100,000 $200,000 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 ORLP Grant (Federal) $0 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Park Development Fund $200,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 $1,450,000 $0 $0 $2,750,000 Park Development Fund &
Unknown Grant
$0 $0 $400,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,400,000
Section 108 Loan, Park
Development
$100,000 $200,000 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000
State Library Grant $369,442 $2,058,869 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,428,311 State Park Grant $700,000 $2,936,000 $6,300,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $12,936,000 Unidentified Grant $0 $100,000 $600,000 $11,900,000 $0 $0 $12,600,000 WCB Public Access $82,192 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $82,192
$2,622,097 $6,314,869 $28,570,000 $33,100,000 $5,000,000 $0 $75,606,966 Total REU
Potential Funding Sources 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Electric Rates $1,371,393 $1,500,000 $1,320,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,191,393 System Financing $25,610,331 $17,452,000 $18,820,000 $15,160,000 $13,950,000 $13,950,000 $104,942,331 $26,981,724 $18,952,000 $20,140,000 $15,160,000 $13,950,000 $13,950,000 $109,133,724 Total B-14
Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
RFD
Potential Funding Sources 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total General Fund $0 $110,000 $0 $13,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $25,110,000 Grant $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
$0 $1,610,000 $0 $13,000,000 $6,000,000 $6,000,000 $26,610,000 Total Solid Waste
Potential Funding Sources 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Solid Waste Rates/Fees $449,000 $1,800,000 $1,090,000 $2,050,000 $2,095,000 $2,250,000 $9,734,000 State Grant $0 $0 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000
$449,000 $1,800,000 $4,290,000 $2,050,000 $2,095,000 $2,250,000 $12,934,000 Total Storm Drain
Potential Funding Sources 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Grant $1,287,871 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,287,871
Storm Drain Rates $320,290 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,820,290 Wastewater Rates $3,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,750,000
$5,358,161 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $7,858,161 Total B-15
Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
Streets
Potential Funding Sources 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total AHSC Grant $801,701 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $801,701
ARPA Grant $200,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
CDBG Grant $244,575 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $244,575
Clean CA Grant $450,000 $1,393,684 $1,980,595 $0 $0 $0 $3,824,278 CRRSSA State Grant $10,000 $48,645 $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,645
Federal CDBG Grant $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Federal EDA Grant / CA SHOPP $1,009,563 $1,860,437 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,870,000 Federal Grant $810,000 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,632,000 Federal HBP Grant $3,042,434 $11,329,889 $5,609,701 $3,700,810 $0 $0 $23,682,834 Federal HSIP Grant $57,060 $2,301,047 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,358,107 Federal Section 130 Grant $10,000 $70,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $110,000 General Fund $105,906 $5,000,000 $4,436,146 $0 $0 $0 $9,542,052 Local Streets and Roads Fund $1,622,547 $5,788,043 $3,491,296 $3,330,000 $3,330,000 $3,330,000 $20,891,886 North Redding Traffic Benefit
District Fees
$0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
RRA Successor $45,000 $255,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
SB1 RMRA $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 State ATP Grant $290,000 $6,700,000 $400,000 $5,540,958 $0 $0 $12,930,958 State Grant $454,000 $1,839,454 $500,000 $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $10,793,454 Traffic Impact Fees $2,333,587 $3,134,250 $1,333,503 $400,000 $3,918,650 $200,000 $11,319,990 $13,561,374 $49,917,449 $19,906,240 $21,046,768 $11,323,650 $5,605,000 $121,360,480 Total Wastewater
Potential Funding Sources 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total CalRecycle Grant $0 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 Wastewater Rates $16,288,320 $42,142,540 $16,612,300 $11,054,550 $8,107,670 $3,662,610 $97,867,990 $16,288,320 $52,142,540 $16,612,300 $11,054,550 $8,107,670 $3,662,610 $107,867,990 Total B-16
Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Division
Water
Potential Funding Sources 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Grant $961,167 $461,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,422,867
SRF Loan $0 $0 $60,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,000,000
Water Connection Fees $112,433 $2,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,412,433 Water Rates $22,421,169 $20,203,228 $15,750,390 $11,772,608 $12,745,585 $17,069,347 $99,962,328 $23,494,769 $22,964,928 $75,750,390 $11,772,608 $12,745,585 $17,069,347 $163,797,628 Total The above is an overview of potential funding sources for projects contained in the main term of the Capital Improvement Plan and each project is subject to Redding City Council budgetary approval.

Note:

Grand Total $89,219,668 $186,853,518 $167,111,464 $122,254,452 $73,944,586 $79,266,957 $718,650,645 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total
B-17
Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Source
Airport Fund
Funding Source 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Airport Fund $219,790 $219,790 $9,766 $8,360,581 $22,817 $150,150 $10,597,356 $219,790 $1,834,251 $9,766 $8,360,581 $22,817 $150,150 $10,597,356 Total ARPA
Funding Source 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Grant $1,287,871 $1,287,871 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,287,871
$1,287,871 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,287,871 Total
General Fund
Funding Source 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total General Fund $575,906 $575,906 $9,106,146 $19,500,000 $11,000,000 $6,000,000 $51,842,052 $575,906 $5,660,000 $9,106,146 $19,500,000 $11,000,000 $6,000,000 $51,842,052 Total B-18
Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Source
Grant
Funding Source 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total AHSC Grant $801,701 $801,701 $0 $0 $0 $0 $801,701
ARPA Grant $265,000 $265,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $585,000
CalRecycle Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000
CDBG Grant $244,575 $244,575 $0 $0 $0 $0 $244,575
CDFA Grant $0 $0 $5,000,000 $4,250,000 $0 $0 $9,250,000 Clean CA Grant $450,000 $450,000 $3,180,595 $0 $0 $0 $5,074,278 Community Foundation of the North
State
$493,960 $493,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $493,960
CRRSSA State Grant $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,645
EHCRP Grant $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000 Federal CDBG Grant $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Federal EDA Grant / CA SHOPP $1,009,563 $1,009,563 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,870,000 Federal FAA Grant $221,604 $221,604 $1,275,405 $5,841,375 $12,890,758 $27,388,500 $76,848,121 Federal Grant $810,000 $810,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,632,000
Federal HBP Grant $3,042,434 $3,042,434 $5,609,701 $3,700,810 $0 $0 $23,682,834 Federal HSIP Grant $57,060 $57,060 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,358,107 Federal Section 130 Grant $10,000 $10,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $110,000 Grant $961,167 $961,167 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,922,867
ORLP Grant $100,000 $100,000 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 ORLP Grant (Federal) $0 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $4,000,000 RRA Successor $45,000 $45,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Section 108 Loan, Park Development $100,000 $100,000 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 State ATP Grant $290,000 $290,000 $400,000 $5,540,958 $0 $0 $12,930,958 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $181,894 $17,851 $122,850 $340,029 State Grant $454,000 $454,000 $3,700,000 $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $13,993,454 State Library Grant $369,442 $369,442 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,428,311 State Park Grant $700,000 $700,000 $6,300,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $12,936,000 Unidentified Grant $0 $0 $600,000 $11,900,000 $0 $0 $12,600,000 WCB Public Access $82,192 $82,192 $0 $0 $0 $0 $82,192
$10,592,697 $80,769,638 $35,570,701 $43,490,037 $14,983,609 $27,586,350 $212,993,032 Total Impact Fees
Funding Source 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total North Redding Traffic Benefit District
Fees
$0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Traffic Impact Fees $2,333,587 $2,333,587 $1,333,503 $400,000 $3,918,650 $200,000 $11,319,990 Water Connection Fees $112,433 $112,433 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,412,433 $2,446,020 $5,434,250 $1,383,503 $400,000 $3,918,650 $200,000 $13,782,423 Total B-19
Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Source
Local Streets and Roads Fund
Funding Source 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Local Streets and Roads Fund $1,622,547 $1,622,547 $3,491,296 $3,330,000 $3,330,000 $3,330,000 $20,891,886 SB1 RMRA $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 $3,622,547 $7,788,043 $5,491,296 $5,330,000 $5,330,000 $5,330,000 $32,891,886 Total Park Development Fund
Funding Source 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Park Development Fund $200,000 $200,000 $1,000,000 $1,450,000 $0 $0 $2,750,000 $200,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 $1,450,000 $0 $0 $2,750,000 Total Park Development Fund & Unknown Grant
Funding Source 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Park Development Fund & Unknown
Grant
$0 $0 $400,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,400,000
$0 $0 $400,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,400,000 Total
Park In-Lieu
Funding Source 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total General Fund $41,503 $41,503 $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,503
$41,503 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $141,503 Total
PFC
Funding Source 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total PFC $22,830 $22,830 $57,362 $186,676 $1,291,255 $2,568,500 $5,696,191 $22,830 $1,569,568 $57,362 $186,676 $1,291,255 $2,568,500 $5,696,191 Total SRF Loan
Funding Source 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total SRF Loan $0 $0 $60,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,000,000
$0 $0 $60,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,000,000 Total
B-20
Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Funding Overview by Source
Utility Rates
Funding Source 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Electric Rates $1,371,393 $1,371,393 $1,320,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,191,393 Solid Waste Rates/Fees $449,000 $449,000 $1,090,000 $2,050,000 $2,095,000 $2,250,000 $9,734,000 Storm Drain Rates $320,290 $320,290 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,820,290 System Financing $25,610,331 $25,610,331 $18,820,000 $15,160,000 $13,950,000 $13,950,000 $104,942,331 Wastewater Rates $20,038,320 $20,038,320 $16,612,300 $11,054,550 $8,107,670 $3,662,610 $101,617,990 Water Rates $22,421,169 $22,421,169 $15,750,390 $11,772,608 $12,745,585 $17,069,347 $99,962,328 $70,210,503 $83,597,768 $54,092,690 $40,537,158 $37,398,255 $37,431,957 $323,268,331 Total The above is an overview of potential funding sources for projects contained in the main term of the Capital Improvement Plan and each project is subject to Redding City Council budgetary approval.

Note:

Grand Total $89,219,668 $186,853,518 $167,111,464 $122,254,452 $73,944,586 $79,266,957 $718,650,645 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total
B-21
Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

SECTION C

DETAILED PROGRAM

SUMMARIES
Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Eastside T-Hangar Taxilane Reconstruction
This project includes the reconstruction of 16,000 square yards of taxilanes on the eastside of Benton Airpark. These taxilanes are deteriorated and are needed to access City-owned t-hangars.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$3,940,000
$3,940,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-26-1
Airport Fund $2,962 $918 $0 $28,500 $0 $0 $32,380
Federal FAA Grant $0 $348,686 $0 $3,391,500 $0 $0 $3,740,186 State Aviation Grant $0 $17,434 $0 $150,000 $0 $0 $167,434 Total $2,962 $367,038 $0 $3,570,000 $0 $0 $3,940,000
Project Development $2,962 $370,000
Construction
Total
$367,038 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,570,000 $0 $0 $3,570,000
$2,962 $367,038 $0 $3,570,000 $0 $0 $3,940,000
Benton Field Vehicle Gate Replacement
Description: Replace Vehicle gate at Benton Field
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$36,000
$36,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-26-2
Airport Fund $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000
Total $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000
Project Development $0 $3,600
Construction
Total
$3,600 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $32,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,400
$0 $36,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $36,000
Underground Powerline RPZ
Description: Installing underground powerline under runway protection zone.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$547,051
$547,051
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-27-1
Airport Fund $0 $0 $6,353 $23,100 $0 $0 $29,453
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $120,698 $378,000 $0 $0 $498,698 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $18,900 $0 $0 $18,900
Total $0 $0 $127,051 $420,000 $0 $0 $547,051
Project Development $0 $127,051
Construction
Total
$0 $127,051 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $420,000 $0 $0 $420,000
$0 $0 $127,051 $420,000 $0 $0 $547,051
C-1
Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Security Fencing - North RPZ
Description: Installing security fencing around North Runway Protection Zone Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$357,001
$357,001
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-27-2
Airport Fund $0 $0 $3,413 $15,881 $0 $0 $19,294
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $64,838 $259,875 $0 $0 $324,713 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $12,994 $0 $0 $12,994
Total $0 $0 $68,251 $288,750 $0 $0 $357,001
Project Development $0 $68,251
Construction
Total
$0 $68,251 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $288,750 $0 $0 $288,750
$0 $0 $68,251 $288,750 $0 $0 $357,001
Benton Field West Side Open Hangar Pavement Rehabilitation Description: Pavement Rehabilitation for West Side Open Hanger Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$100,000
$100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-27-3
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Project Development $0 $10,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $10,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $90,000 $0 $0 $90,000
$0 $0 $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $100,000
Open Hangar Replacements
Description: Replace open Hangars
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$2,700,000
$2,700,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-28-1
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $2,700,000 $0 $0 $2,700,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $2,700,000 $0 $0 $2,700,000
Project Development $0 $270,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $270,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $2,430,000 $0 $0 $2,430,000
$0 $0 $0 $2,700,000 $0 $0 $2,700,000
C-2
Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Sun Shade Hangar Replacement
Description: Replace Sun Shade Hanger
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$1,800,000
$1,800,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-28-2
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $1,800,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $1,800,000
Project Development $0 $180,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $180,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $1,620,000 $0 $0 $1,620,000
$0 $0 $0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $1,800,000
New Hangar Development
Description: Development of new Hanger
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$3,500,000
$3,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-28-3
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $3,500,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $3,500,000
Project Development $0 $350,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $350,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,150,000 $0 $0 $3,150,000
$0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $0 $0 $3,500,000
FBO HVAC Replacement
Description: HVAC Replacement
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$40,000
$40,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-28-4
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000
Project Development $0 $4,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $4,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $36,000 $0 $0 $36,000
$0 $0 $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $40,000
C-3
Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
CHP Hangar HVAC Replacement
Description: HVAC Replacement
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$18,000
$18,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-28-5
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $18,000 $0 $0 $18,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $18,000 $0 $0 $18,000
Project Development $0 $1,800
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $1,800 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $16,200 $0 $0 $16,200
$0 $0 $0 $18,000 $0 $0 $18,000
Cardan Hangar Swamp Coolers
Description: Swamp Coolers Replacement for Cardan Hangar Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$15,000
$15,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-28-6
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $15,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $15,000
Project Development $0 $1,500
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $1,500 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $13,500 $0 $0 $13,500
$0 $0 $0 $15,000 $0 $0 $15,000
Cardan Hangar Row Roof Replacement
Description: Roof Replacement for Cardan Hanger Row
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$70,000
$70,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-28-7
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $70,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $70,000
Project Development $0 $7,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $7,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $63,000 $0 $0 $63,000
$0 $0 $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $70,000
C-4
Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Cameras at Access Control Gates
Description: Cameras at Access Control Gates
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$50,100
$50,100
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-28-8
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $50,100 $0 $0 $50,100
Total $0 $0 $0 $50,100 $0 $0 $50,100
Project Development $0 $5,010
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $5,010 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $45,090 $0 $0 $45,090
$0 $0 $0 $50,100 $0 $0 $50,100
Northeast Apron and Taxilanes Reconstruction
Description: To replace pavement rated as poor by the Airport Pavement Management Plan.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$3,075,170
$3,075,170
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-29-1
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,929 $150,150 $170,079
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $309,753 $2,457,000 $2,766,753 State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,488 $122,850 $138,338 Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $345,170 $2,730,000 $3,075,170
Project Development $0 $345,170
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $345,170 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,730,000 $2,730,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $345,170 $2,730,000 $3,075,170
Airport Pavement Management Study
Description: Create Pavement Management Plan for Benton Airpark Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$52,501
$52,501
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-BEN-29-2
Airport Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,888 $0 $2,888
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $47,250 $0 $47,250
State Aviation Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,363 $0 $2,363
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,501 $0 $52,501
Project Development $0 $52,501
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $52,501 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $52,501 $0 $52,501
C-5
Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Sureveillance Cameras
Description: Sureveillance Cameras
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$23,211
$51,789
$75,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-14
Airport Fund $0 $51,789 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,789
Total $0 $51,789 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,789
Project Development $0 $5,179
Construction
Total
$5,179 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $46,610 $0 $0 $0 $0 $46,610
$0 $51,789 $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,789
Terminal Assessment Study
Description: Assessment for new terminal.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$260,685
$239,315
$500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-2
Airport Fund $33,771 $205,544 $0 $0 $0 $0 $239,315
Total $33,771 $205,544 $0 $0 $0 $0 $239,315
Project Development $33,771 $239,315
Construction
Total
$205,544 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$33,771 $205,544 $0 $0 $0 $0 $239,315
Master Plan Update
Airport Layout Plan Update & Narrative Report, inlcuding an Aeronautical AGIS Survey, Terminal Expansion Study, Energy Audit Assessment, Environmental Surveys, and Land Use Analysis Study.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$576,348
$476,990
$1,053,338
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-22-8
Federal FAA Grant $193,989 $238,450 $0 $0 $0 $0 $432,439 PFC $19,985 $24,566 $0 $0 $0 $0 $44,551
Total $213,974 $263,016 $0 $0 $0 $0 $476,990
Project Development $213,974 $476,990
Construction
Total
$263,016 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$213,974 $263,016 $0 $0 $0 $0 $476,990
C-6
Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Passenger Terminal Public Parking Design/Construction
Description: Public Parking for Airport Passengers
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$37,023
$1,548,057
$1,585,080
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-2
Airport Fund $48,057 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,548,057
Total $48,057 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,548,057
Project Development $48,057 $198,057
Construction
Total
$150,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,350,000
$48,057 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,548,057
PHI Hangar Roof
Description: Landlord obligation to repair leaking roof of PHI Hangar Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2600 Gold Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Benton Airpark
$0
$135,000
$135,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-23-6
Airport Fund $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000
Total $135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000
Project Development $13,500 $13,500
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$121,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $121,500
$135,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $135,000
Runway 16-34, 12-30 and Taxiway Connectors - Phase I, II, & III Description: Construction phase for project including 4-inch mill and overlay, blast pad reconstruction and initial electrical.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$968,862
$30,218,805
$31,187,667
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-24-1
Federal FAA Grant $27,615 $28,643,343 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,670,958 PFC $2,845 $1,545,002 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,547,847
Total $30,460 $30,188,345 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,218,805
Project Development $0 $3,018,834
Construction
Total
$3,018,834 $0 $0 $0 $0
$30,460 $27,169,511 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,199,971
$30,460 $30,188,345 $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,218,805
C-7
Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Acquire Snow Removal Equipment Attachments
Description: Purchase of Snow Plow Attachments for Utility Vehicles Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$40,000
$40,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-26-2
Airport Fund $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
Total $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
$0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
Runway 16-34 Safety Area Improvements
Description: Design and Construction for 16-34 RSA Improvements Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$14,797,231
$14,797,231
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-27-1
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $1,089,869 $0 $12,375,090 $0 $13,464,959 PFC $0 $0 $57,362 $0 $1,274,910 $0 $1,332,272
Total $0 $0 $1,147,231 $0 $13,650,000 $0 $14,797,231
Project Development $0 $1,147,231
Construction
Total
$0 $1,147,231 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $13,650,000 $0 $13,650,000
$0 $0 $1,147,231 $0 $13,650,000 $0 $14,797,231
Taxiway Connector Reconstruction and Electrical Improvements Description: Design and Construction for Taxiway Connector Reconstuction and Electrical Improvements.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$29,498,676
$29,498,676
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-28-1
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $1,812,000 $0 $24,931,500 $26,743,500 PFC $0 $0 $0 $186,676 $0 $2,568,500 $2,755,176
Total $0 $0 $0 $1,998,676 $0 $27,500,000 $29,498,676
Project Development $0 $1,998,676
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $1,998,676 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,500,000 $27,500,000
$0 $0 $0 $1,998,676 $0 $27,500,000 $29,498,676
C-8
Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Airports
Wildlife Hazard Assessment
Description: Wildlife hazard assessment and wildlife hazard management plan development.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
6751 Woodrum Circle
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Redding Municipal Airport
$0
$175,010
$175,010
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

A-MUN-29-1
Federal FAA Grant $0 $0 $0 $0 $158,665 $0 $158,665
PFC $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,345 $0 $16,345
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,010 $0 $175,010
Project Development $0 $175,010
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $175,010 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $175,010 $0 $175,010
C-9
Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Shastina Ranch Park & Trail Development
Construct 7-acre park site on dedicated land in the SE quadrant located in a subdivision under development.

Includes a multi-purpose playing field, playgrounds, shaded picnic areas, and trail connections to adjacent public open-space areas.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
SE Quadrant, Rancho Road/Shasta View Drive
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$2,034,466
$1,800,000
$3,834,466
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2005-21
General Fund $300,000 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000 Total $300,000 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000
Project Development $0 $150,000
Construction
Total
$0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0
$300,000 $0 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,650,000
$300,000 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000
Salt Creek Heights Park
Design and construction of 8-acre park site on dedicated land in the SE quadrant located in Salt Creek Heights subdivision. The project will include a multi-purpose playing field, playgrounds, shaded picnic areas, trail connections, and a restroom.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
SW Quadrant, off Eureka Way
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$1,480,000
$1,620,000
$3,100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2011-01
General Fund $120,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $1,620,000 Total $120,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $1,620,000
Project Development $0 $150,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0
$120,000 $0 $0 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $1,470,000
$120,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $1,620,000
California Soccer Park
Replace four synthetic turf fields at the existing athletic facility and install additional shade structures. The artificial turf and the underlying drainage system installed during the Park's construction were defective.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
NE Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Park Improvement
$5,150,000
$20,000
$5,170,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2019-01
General Fund $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Total $0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
$0 $0 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $20,000
C-10
Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Caldwell Park Expansion Project
A grant funded expansion and improvement of Caldwell Park, featuring a new bike park, expanded skate park, lighting, and parking. Project also includes a new restroom, exercise equipment, shade structures and public art.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
NW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$4,000,000
$4,936,000
$8,936,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2021-01
State Park Grant $200,000 $2,736,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,936,000 Total $200,000 $2,736,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,936,000 Project Development $400,000 $400,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,336,000 $2,736,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,072,000
$2,736,000 $2,736,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,472,000
Panorama Park
Grant funded project on dedicated land and recreation facility. Includes construction of trails, landscaping, playground and parking.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Lake Boulevard
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$500,000
$26,000,000
$26,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2022-01
CDFA Grant $0 $0 $5,000,000 $4,250,000 $0 $0 $9,250,000 EHCRP Grant $0 $0 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000 ORLP Grant (Federal) $0 $0 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $4,000,000 Park Development Fund $200,000 $100,000 $1,000,000 $1,450,000 $0 $0 $2,750,000 State Park Grant $500,000 $200,000 $4,300,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $8,000,000 Total $700,000 $300,000 $13,300,000 $11,700,000 $0 $0 $26,000,000 Project Development $500,000 $800,000
Construction
Total
$300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$200,000 $0 $13,300,000 $11,700,000 $0 $0 $25,200,000
$700,000 $300,000 $13,300,000 $11,700,000 $0 $0 $26,000,000 MLK JR. Center & Park
Description: Remodel of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Building & Park.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
SW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$15,000
$3,985,000
$4,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2022-02
ARPA Grant $65,000 $20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $85,000
Unidentified Grant $0 $0 $0 $3,900,000 $0 $0 $3,900,000 Total $65,000 $20,000 $0 $3,900,000 $0 $0 $3,985,000
Project Development $65,000 $85,000
Construction
Total
$20,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,900,000 $0 $0 $3,900,000
$65,000 $20,000 $0 $3,900,000 $0 $0 $3,985,000
C-11
Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
South City Park
Description: Revilatization of South City Park with new design and construction.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
SW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$7,000,000
$7,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2022-03
ORLP Grant $100,000 $200,000 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 Section 108 Loan, Park $100,000 $200,000 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 Development
Total $200,000 $400,000 $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000
Project Development $200,000 $600,000
Construction
Total
$400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $6,400,000
$200,000 $400,000 $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000
Stress Ribbon Bridge Art Project
Phase I, painting a mural on the abutments of the Stress Ribbon Bridge (Complete), Phase II painting the bridge rails to match the mural (Will be complete 2023), Phase III completition and installation of a sculpture near the bridge.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
NW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Art installation, bridge, and
$245,670
$493,960
$739,630
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-01
Community Foundation of the $493,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $493,960 North State
Total $493,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $493,960
Project Development $113,750 $113,750
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$380,210 $0 $0 $0 $0 $380,210
$493,960 $0 $0 $0 $0 $493,960
Turtle Bay Boat Ramp
To complete planning, design, engineering, CEQA and permitting for enhancements to the Turtle Bay Boating Access.

Improvements to be designed include a widened, two-lane boat ramp and a boating beach/non-motorized launch, additional parking, ADA-compliant restroom, non-motorized capacity and access improvements, and interpretive signage.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
SW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Boat Ramp
$13,924
$4,198,268
$4,212,192
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-02
General Fund $16,076 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,076
Unidentified Grant $0 $0 $100,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $4,100,000 WCB Public Access $82,192 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $82,192
Total $98,268 $0 $100,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $4,198,268
Project Development $9,827 $109,827
Construction
Total
$0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0
$88,441 $0 $0 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $4,088,441
$98,268 $0 $100,000 $4,000,000 $0 $0 $4,198,268
C-12
Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Burney Library Infrastructure Grant
Description: Projects include a new backup generator, security and lighting, roof replacment, solar, and HVAC UV filtration system.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
37116 Main St. | Burney, CA 96013
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvement
$3,668
$449,442
$453,110
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-04
State Library Grant $149,442 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $449,442 Total $149,442 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $449,442
Project Development $44,944 $44,944
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$104,498 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $404,498
$149,442 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $449,442
Redding Library Infrastructure Grant
Projects include new generator housing, backup generator, new carpet/LVT, lighting control planels, batteries for ELESCO Emergency Lighting, New HVAC controls, and HVAC UV filtration Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
1100 Parkview Ave., Redding, CA 96001
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvement
$44,472
$1,562,876
$1,607,348
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-05
State Library Grant $120,000 $1,442,876 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,562,876 Total $120,000 $1,442,876 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,562,876
Project Development $120,000 $120,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,442,876 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,442,876
$120,000 $1,442,876 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,562,876
Anderson Library Infrastructure Grant
The City is working on security improvements, HVAC UV filtration system, new roof and solar, backup generator consultant and design, backup generator construction
Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
3200 W. Center St, Anderson, CA 96007
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvement
$13,229
$415,993
$429,222
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-06
State Library Grant $100,000 $315,993 $0 $0 $0 $0 $415,993 Total $100,000 $315,993 $0 $0 $0 $0 $415,993
Project Development $41,599 $41,599
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$58,401 $315,993 $0 $0 $0 $0 $374,394
$100,000 $315,993 $0 $0 $0 $0 $415,993
C-13
Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Jenny Creek
The Jenny Creek Trail project is located off Royal Oaks Drive, connecting T.R. Woods Memorial Park to the Overhill Drive connector to the Sacramento River Trail. The CCC will construct the first phase of the project, an approximately .8-mile trail corridor, by clearing, grading, and placing base rock in preparation for asphalt paving.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
SW Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Trail Development
$34,573
$2,125,427
$2,160,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-07
General Fund $25,427 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $125,427
Unidentified Grant $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,000,000 Total $25,427 $100,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,125,427
Project Development $2,543 $102,543
Construction
Total
$100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$22,884 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,022,884
$25,427 $100,000 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,125,427
Redding Aquatic Center Improvements
Description: Updating bathrooms and other improvement projects Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
44 Quartz Hill Road, Redding, CA
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$300,000
$150,000
$450,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2024-12
General Fund $50,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Total $50,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Project Development $5,000 $5,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$45,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $145,000
$50,000 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000
Overlook Project
Grant funding for the Redding Cultural Trail Overlook project will be used for the construction of an overlook plaza to serve as a vista point and rest stop along the new Diestelhorst to Downtown Trail. The theme of the design is a blend of native cultures and active transportation. The location provides scenic views of the Sacramento River, train trestle, and Caldwell Park. Funding will also address litter abatement and waste removal and include an educational component and physical infrastructure to beautify and encourage cleanliness and public safety along this important corridor.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Benton Rd Area
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Park & Trail Development
$0
$1,250,000
$1,250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2025-01
Clean CA Grant $0 $50,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000 Total $0 $50,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000
Project Development $0 $50,000
Construction
Total
$50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000
$0 $50,000 $1,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,250,000
C-14
Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Community Services
Redding Sports Park
Updates to infrastructure, modernization, and improvement of the Redding Sports Park to provide adequate playing fields and facilities for continued public use.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
NE Quadrant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvement
$0
$10,100,000
$10,100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2025-02
General Fund $0 $50,000 $50,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $10,100,000 Total $0 $50,000 $50,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $10,100,000 Project Development $0 $100,000
Construction
Total
$50,000 $50,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $10,000,000
$0 $50,000 $50,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $10,100,000 The Peaks Subdivision Park
Description: Design and construction of a new park to go into the future Peaks Subdivision Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Quartz Hill
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Park Development
$0
$3,400,000
$3,400,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2025-03
Park Development Fund & $0 $0 $400,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,400,000 Unknown Grant
Total $0 $0 $400,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,400,000
Project Development $0 $400,000
Construction
Total
$0 $400,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,000,000
$0 $0 $400,000 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $3,400,000
Civic Auditorium
Description: Maintenance to Facility
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Civic Auditorium
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Infrastructure Improvement
$0
$6,100,000
$6,100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

CS-2025-04
General Fund $0 $400,000 $3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 Unidentified Grant $0 $100,000 $500,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $2,600,000 Total $0 $500,000 $3,600,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $6,100,000 Project Development $0 $400,000
Construction
Total
$400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,100,000
$0 $400,000 $3,100,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000
C-15
Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Redding Power Substation Controls Modernization
The controls for this substation are part of a System wide substation control modernization project. Replacement of SCADA equipment manufactured by C3-Ilex and control panels that utilize obsolete mechanical protective relays.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Multiple Substations
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$38,640
$99,360
$138,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2017-15
Electric Rates $99,360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $99,360
Total $99,360 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $99,360
Unit 5 Breaker Replacement
Description: Replace generator breaker with better system.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$99
$349,901
$350,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-02
Electric Rates $349,901 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $349,901
Total $349,901 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $349,901
Energy Trading Modernization
Description: Ongoing internal costs to maintain software requested for energy trading modernization project.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
17120 Clear Creek Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$1,191,022
$78,980
$1,270,002
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2019-09
Electric Rates $78,980 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $78,980
Total $78,980 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $78,980
C-16
Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
General System Improvements
General system improvements including the installation of transformers, capacitor banks, poles, overhead and underground conductors and switches, splices/connectors, conduit, splice boxes and vaults.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing System Improvements
REU-2021-01
System Financing $6,685,182 $8,750,000 $8,750,000 $8,750,000 $8,750,000 $8,750,000 $50,435,182 Total $6,685,182 $8,750,000 $8,750,000 $8,750,000 $8,750,000 $8,750,000 $50,435,182 Future Revenue Funded Capital Projects
Description: Future Revenue Funded Capital Projects.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing System Improvements
REU-2021-04
Electric Rates $0 $1,500,000 $1,320,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,820,000 System Financing $0 $8,702,000 $10,070,000 $6,410,000 $5,200,000 $5,200,000 $35,582,000 Total $0 $10,202,000 $11,390,000 $6,410,000 $5,200,000 $5,200,000 $38,402,000 Fire Protection Monitoring System
Based on the recommendation identified during an evaluation, a fire monitoring system is being installed at the Power Plant.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Redding Power Plant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing System Improvements
REU-2021-05
Electric Rates $62,827 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,827
Total $62,827 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,827
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$62,827 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,827
$62,827 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $62,827
C-17
Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Stillwater Substation
Future development plans on the east side of Redding necessitate REU building a new substation. Addresses system capability and service reliability as Redding adds new load.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Venture Parkway
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$227,886
$372,114
$600,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2022-01
Electric Rates $372,114 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $372,114
Total $372,114 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $372,114
Workforce Management System
Deploying a Workforce Management Software Program (SSP Lifecycle-MIMS) to provide REU the ability to access a single system to show current and future work efforts and to automate tasks and business processes enabling data integration and universal access by staff.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$941,789
$288,211
$1,230,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2023-02
Electric Rates $288,211 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $288,211
Total $288,211 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $288,211
Project Development $288,211 $288,211
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$288,211 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $288,211
Power Plant Cathodic Protection System
Design and installation of a cathodic protection system for unprotected natural gas transmission piping within the Redding Power Plant.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Redding Power Plant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$120,000
$120,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2024-01
Electric Rates $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000
Total $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000
Project Development $12,000 $12,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$108,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $108,000
$120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000
C-18
Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Power Plant Administration Building
Description: Construction of a 4,500 square foot building at Redding Power Plant to replace existing office trailers.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Redding Power Plant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$45,743
$2,954,257
$3,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2024-02
System Financing $2,954,257 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,954,257
Total $2,954,257 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,954,257
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,954,257 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,954,257
$2,954,257 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,954,257
Overhead/Underground Replacement
Description: Recruitment of 2 contract line crews working 250 days per year to accelerate replacement of aging infrastructure Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$2,859,051
$12,440,949
$15,300,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2024-03
System Financing $12,440,949 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,440,949 Total $12,440,949 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,440,949
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$12,440,949 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,440,949
$12,440,949 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,440,949
Substation Security Upgrades
Description: Substation security upgrades project.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$135,057
$2,454,943
$2,590,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2024-04
System Financing $2,454,943 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,454,943
Total $2,454,943 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,454,943
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,454,943 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,454,943
$2,454,943 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,454,943
C-19
Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) REU
Substation Circuit Switcher Replacement
Description: Replacement of various substation circuit switchers to enhance the reliability of the system.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$500,000
$500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2024-05
System Financing $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Total $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
$500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Whiskeytown Unit 9 FERC Relicensing
Description: Relicenscing process for 50-year license for hydroelectric facility at Whiskeytown Lake Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Whiskeytown Lake
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$575,000
$575,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

REU-2025-01
System Financing $575,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $575,000
Total $575,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $575,000
Project Development $575,000 $575,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$575,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $575,000
C-20
Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 1 BC Quarters Plumbing
Description: Pumbing update to Battalion Chief Quarters of Fire Station 1 Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
1335 Shasta St
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Build
$0
$40,000
$40,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2024-01
General Fund $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
Total $0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
$0 $40,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000
SCBA Replacement
Description: New self contained breathing apparatus units for fire stations.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
All Fire Stations
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2024-02
Grant $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Total $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
$0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Fire Station 2 Upgrades
Description: Remodel and expansion of Fire Station #2, including adding 2,000 square feet, exterior paint and a generator.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
3491 Placer St
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$6,000,000
$6,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-02
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $6,000,000
C-21
Packet Pg. 486 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 3 Rebuild
Description: Rebuild of Fire Station #3.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
4255 Westside Rd
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$7,000,000
$7,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-03
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $7,000,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $7,000,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $7,000,000
$0 $0 $0 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $7,000,000
Fire Station 4 Upgrades
Description: Remodel and 2,000 sq. ft expansion of Fire Station #4.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2605 S Bonnyview Rd
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$6,000,000
$6,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-04
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $6,000,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $6,000,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $6,000,000
$0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $6,000,000
Fire Station 6 Upgrages
Description: Remodel and 2,000 sq. ft expansion of Fire Station #6.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
1695 Beltline Rd
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Improvements
$0
$6,000,000
$6,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2025-06
General Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $0 $6,000,000
C-22
Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) RFD
Fire Station 2 & 4 Kitchen and Floor Replacement
Description: Replace kitchen and floors of Fire Station 2 and Fire Station 4 Location:

Proposed Funding: 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Project #
Project Type: Fire Station Build
$0
$70,000
$70,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

RFD-2026-09
General Fund $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
Total $0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
$0 $70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $70,000
C-23
Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
West Side Hauling Yard
To expand the facility to the City owned property on the west side of Abernathy Lane, relocating driver and truck parking and marshalling room.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$3,360,000
$3,360,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-2026-01
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $0 $480,000 $960,000 $960,000 $960,000 $3,360,000 Total $0 $0 $480,000 $960,000 $960,000 $960,000 $3,360,000 Project Development $0 $336,000
Construction
Total
$0 $48,000 $96,000 $96,000 $96,000
$0 $0 $432,000 $864,000 $864,000 $864,000 $3,024,000
$0 $0 $480,000 $960,000 $960,000 $960,000 $3,360,000
MRF Tipping Building Expansion
Expand the MRF processing building for additional receiving, storing, and processing recyclables, inclusive of upgrades to sorting and screening equipment with innovative technology.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$2,100,000
$2,100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-2026-02
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $0 $300,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $2,100,000 Total $0 $0 $300,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $2,100,000 Project Development $0 $210,000
Construction
Total
$0 $30,000 $60,000 $60,000 $60,000
$0 $0 $270,000 $540,000 $540,000 $540,000 $1,890,000
$0 $0 $300,000 $600,000 $600,000 $600,000 $2,100,000
Pit Area Lift Station Retrofit
Description: To increase stormwater handling capacity in Pit area.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$500,000
$500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-2026-03
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000 Total $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Project Development $0 $50,000
Construction
Total
$50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $450,000
$0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
C-24
Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Transfer Station Gate Repair
Description: Repair and upgrade of entrance gate system for Transfer station Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$100,000
$100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-2026-05
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Total $0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Project Development $0 $10,000
Construction
Total
$10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $90,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000
$0 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000
Organics Pre-Processing Expansion
Installation of organics preprocessing equipment for food waste as part of a " Food Waste to Energy" project in collaboration with the City' s wastewater treatment plant.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$1,540,000
$1,540,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-2029-01
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $0 $220,000 $440,000 $440,000 $440,000 $1,540,000 Total $0 $0 $220,000 $440,000 $440,000 $440,000 $1,540,000 Project Development $0 $154,000
Construction
Total
$0 $22,000 $44,000 $44,000 $44,000
$0 $0 $198,000 $396,000 $396,000 $396,000 $1,386,000
$0 $0 $220,000 $440,000 $440,000 $440,000 $1,540,000
Transfer Station Tipping Floor
The tipping floor is subject to use by heavy equipment and garbage trucks and wears down over time, requiring periodic resurfacing.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-01
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000 Total $0 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000
Project Development $0 $60,000
Construction
Total
$60,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $540,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $540,000
$0 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $600,000
C-25
Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Transfer Facility Resurface Asphalt
The asphalt within the facility is over 18 years old and failing due to aging and daily use by heavy equipment and trucks.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-02
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $250,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $850,000 Total $250,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $850,000
Project Development $25,000 $85,000
Construction
Total
$35,000 $0 $0 $0 $25,000
$225,000 $315,000 $0 $0 $0 $225,000 $765,000
$250,000 $350,000 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 $850,000
Slurry Seal
Description: Slurry seal to seal and maintain the driveways within the Transfer and Recycling Facility.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-03
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $102,000 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $152,000 Total $102,000 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $152,000
Project Development $10,200 $15,200
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $5,000 $0 $0
$91,800 $0 $0 $45,000 $0 $0 $136,800
$102,000 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $152,000
Crane Repairs
The crane is used to adjust loads in the transfer trailers prior to hauling to the landfill. Crane repairs cover the cost of replacing parts due to daily wear and tear on the machine.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Facility Maintenance
SW-4941-06
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $97,000 $0 $90,000 $0 $95,000 $0 $282,000 Total $97,000 $0 $90,000 $0 $95,000 $0 $282,000
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$97,000 $0 $90,000 $0 $95,000 $0 $282,000
$97,000 $0 $90,000 $0 $95,000 $0 $282,000
C-26
Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Solid Waste
Materials Recovery Facility Expansion
Description: Replacement of sorting screens and conveyor belts to update machine and improve processing capacity.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$3,200,000
$3,200,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-13
State Grant $0 $0 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000
Total $0 $0 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000
Project Development $0 $320,000
Construction
Total
$0 $320,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $2,880,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,880,000
$0 $0 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000
Marshalling Room Remodel
Extensive remodel of both the men and women’s bathroom facilities increasing the size of the men’s restroom by removing walls and relocating plumbing and electrical.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2255 Abernathy Lane
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Facility Improvements
$0
$250,000
$250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SW-4941-14
Solid Waste Rates/Fees $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Total $0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
Project Development $0 $25,000
Construction
Total
$25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $225,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $225,000
$0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000
C-27
Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Storm Drain
Emergency Repairs - Bonnyview
Emergency Storm Drain reapir at Bonnyview Boat Ramp location. Project will be funded by Wastewater Rates and loan repaid to Wastewater Utility via Storm Drain Rates.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Bonnyview Boat Ramp
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$0
$3,750,000
$3,750,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

FINANC23002
Wastewater Rates $3,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,750,000
Total $3,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,750,000
Project Development $187,500 $187,500
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$3,562,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,562,500
$3,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,750,000
Storm Drain Replacement
Description: Critical pipe lining at various locations throughout the City.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing System Improvements
SD-2025-01
Storm Drain Rates $210,500 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,710,500 Total $210,500 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,710,500 Project Development $21,050 $271,050
Construction
Total
$50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
$189,450 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $450,000 $2,439,450 $210,500 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $2,710,500 ARPA - Strom Drain Upgrades
Description: Install new storm drain system in area with existing roadside swales and ditches.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$1,188,959
$1,287,871
$2,476,830
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SDADM23001
Grant $1,287,871 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,287,871
Total $1,287,871 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,287,871
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,287,871 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,287,871
$1,287,871 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,287,871
C-28
Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Storm Drain
Full Trash Capture Project Pilot
Description: Installation of full trash capture devices in storm drain system to comply with state mandates.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: System Improvements
$64,897
$109,790
$174,688
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

SDADM23005
Storm Drain Rates $109,790 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $109,790
Total $109,790 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $109,790
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$109,790 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $109,790
$109,790 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $109,790
C-29
Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Liberty Street Sidewalk
Description: Replacing damaged portions of sidewalk, curb, gutter, and asphalt concrete Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Liberty Street, Eureka Way, East Street, and Trinity
Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$794,575
$794,575
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

HCOMD23024
ARPA Grant $200,000 $300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
CDBG Grant $244,575 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $244,575
Local Streets and Roads Fund $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 Total $469,575 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $794,575
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$469,575 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $794,575
$469,575 $325,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $794,575
Canyon Road Bridge over ACID Canal
Description: Replace the bridge on Canyon Road over the ACID Canal.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Canyon Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$525,718
$2,061,781
$2,587,498
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23003
Federal HBP Grant $90,900 $1,735,542 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,826,442 Traffic Impact Fees $10,481 $224,858 $0 $0 $0 $0 $235,339 Total $101,381 $1,960,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,061,781
Project Development $5,069 $103,089
Construction
Total
$98,020 $0 $0 $0 $0
$96,312 $1,862,380 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,958,692
$101,381 $1,960,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,061,781
Turtle Bay to Downtown
Turtle Bay to Downtown Multi-use trail connecting Dana to Downtown and Turtle Bay boat ramp to Continental.

Includes a tunnel; shared use path; and pedestrian safety lighting.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
North of (parallel to) SR44
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening
$448,547
$6,550,000
$6,998,547
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23004
State ATP Grant $150,000 $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000 Total $150,000 $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000
Project Development $150,000 $197,500
Construction
Total
$47,500 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $6,352,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,352,500
$150,000 $6,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,550,000
C-30
Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Bridge Maintenance Program
Description: Bridge Maintenance Grant funding various repairs of 7 Bridges.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Bridges Improvements
$32,106
$816,160
$848,266
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23005
Federal HBP Grant $7,500 $127,065 $511,704 $0 $0 $0 $646,269 Local Streets and Roads Fund $860 $12,735 $66,296 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $169,891 Total $8,360 $139,800 $578,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $816,160 Project Development $8,360 $78,160
Construction
Total
$57,800 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 $3,000
$0 $82,000 $575,000 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $738,000
$8,360 $139,800 $578,000 $30,000 $30,000 $30,000 $816,160 Systemic Left Turns
Provide left turn lanes and left turn protected phasing where none exists at selected intersections. Includes striping between intersections to facilitate intersection modifications.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$20,023
$1,187,113
$1,207,136
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23006
Local Streets and Roads Fund $21,000 $85,213 $0 $0 $0 $0 $106,213 State Grant $189,000 $891,900 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,080,900
Total $210,000 $977,113 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,187,113
Project Development $210,000 $210,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $977,113 $0 $0 $0 $0 $977,113
$210,000 $977,113 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,187,113
Systemic Intersection Safety Lighting
Install new intersection safety lighting where none exists and correct deficient existing lighting at un-signalized intersections.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$112,978
$737,554
$850,532
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23007
State Grant $40,000 $697,554 $0 $0 $0 $0 $737,554
Total $40,000 $697,554 $0 $0 $0 $0 $737,554
Project Development $20,000 $20,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$20,000 $697,554 $0 $0 $0 $0 $717,554
$40,000 $697,554 $0 $0 $0 $0 $737,554
C-31
Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Victor & Cypress ATP (VCAT)
The project will complete sidewalk gaps, install ADA ramps, narrow travel lanes to provide standard bike lanes, and add street lighting along Churn Creek Road and Maraglia Street. An enhanced crosswalk will also be installed on Churn Creek Road with a refuge island and rectangular rapid flashing beacons.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Churn Creek Rd. between Hartnell and Cypress and
Maraglia St. between Churn Creek and Hilltop.

Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$895,459
$8,983,000
$9,878,459
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23009
Federal Grant $810,000 $7,822,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,632,000 Local Streets and Roads Fund $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Traffic Impact Fees $0 $351,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $351,000
Total $810,000 $8,173,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,983,000
Project Development $810,000 $1,627,300
Construction
Total
$817,300 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $7,355,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,355,700
$810,000 $8,173,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,983,000
Old Oregon Trail Widening
Description: Widen and realign Old Oregon Trail from Paso Robles to Bear Mountain Road.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Old Oregon Trail
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening/Extension
$1,020,267
$2,733,178
$3,753,445
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23011
Federal HSIP Grant $57,060 $2,301,047 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,358,107 Local Streets and Roads Fund $93,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $93,000 Traffic Impact Fees $20,000 $262,071 $0 $0 $0 $0 $282,071 Total $170,060 $2,563,118 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,733,178
Project Development $85,030 $85,030
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$85,030 $2,563,118 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,648,148
$170,060 $2,563,118 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,733,178
Old Alturas Road Bridge over Churn Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Old Alturas Road over Churn Creek.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Old Alturas Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$4,209,712
$5,227,500
$9,437,212
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23012
Federal HBP Grant $2,551,503 $1,708,407 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,259,910 Traffic Impact Fees $767,590 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $967,590 Total $3,319,093 $1,908,407 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,227,500
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$3,319,093 $1,908,407 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,227,500
$3,319,093 $1,908,407 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,227,500
C-32
Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Girvan Road Bridge over Olney Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Girvan Road over Olney Creek.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Girvan Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$489,378
$2,455,000
$2,944,378
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23013
Federal HBP Grant $44,265 $132,795 $1,996,352 $0 $0 $0 $2,173,412 Traffic Impact Fees $5,735 $17,205 $258,648 $0 $0 $0 $281,588 Total $50,000 $150,000 $2,255,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,455,000
Project Development $50,000 $245,500
Construction
Total
$150,000 $45,500 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $2,209,500 $0 $0 $0 $2,209,500
$50,000 $150,000 $2,255,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,455,000
Westside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow
Description: Replace the bridge on Railroad Avenue over Canyon Hollow Creek Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Westside Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$728,129
$3,452,670
$4,180,799
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23014
Federal HBP Grant $153,267 $3,299,403 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,452,670 Traffic Impact Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $153,267 $3,299,403 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,452,670
Project Development $153,267 $153,267
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $3,299,403 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,299,403
$153,267 $3,299,403 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,452,670
Eastside Road Bridge over Canyon Hollow
Description: Replace the bridge on Eastside Road over Canyon Hollow Creek Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Eastside Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$627,632
$3,865,000
$4,492,632
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23015
Federal HBP Grant $30,000 $300,000 $3,091,645 $0 $0 $0 $3,421,645 Traffic Impact Fees $3,500 $35,000 $404,855 $0 $0 $0 $443,355 Total $33,500 $335,000 $3,496,500 $0 $0 $0 $3,865,000
Project Development $33,500 $380,000
Construction
Total
$335,000 $11,500 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $3,485,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,485,000
$33,500 $335,000 $3,496,500 $0 $0 $0 $3,865,000
C-33
Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Eastside Road Bridge over Olney Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Eastside Road over Olney Creek.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Eastside Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$2,063,407
$4,655,676
$6,719,083
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23016
Federal HBP Grant $125,000 $3,996,676 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,121,676 Traffic Impact Fees $15,000 $519,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $534,000 Total $140,000 $4,515,676 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,655,676
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$140,000 $4,515,676 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,655,676
$140,000 $4,515,676 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,655,676
Sacramento Drive Bridge over Olney Creek
Description: Replace the bridge on Sacramento Drive over Olney Creek.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Sacramento Drive
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$1,020,259
$3,780,810
$4,801,069
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23017
Federal HBP Grant $40,000 $30,000 $10,000 $3,700,810 $0 $0 $3,780,810 Total $40,000 $30,000 $10,000 $3,700,810 $0 $0 $3,780,810 Project Development $40,000 $80,000
Construction
Total
$30,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $3,700,810 $0 $0 $3,700,810
$40,000 $30,000 $10,000 $3,700,810 $0 $0 $3,780,810
Airport Corridor Phase II
Description: Widen Airport Road for additional capacity and operational safety.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Airport Road Corridor
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening/Extension
$91,839
$1,918,350
$2,010,189
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23020
Local Streets and Roads Fund $0 $1,618,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,618,350 RRA Successor $45,000 $255,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Total $45,000 $1,873,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,918,350
Project Development $45,000 $232,335
Construction
Total
$187,335 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,686,015 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,686,015
$45,000 $1,873,350 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,918,350
C-34
Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Churn Creek/Rancho/Victor Roundabout
Description: Construct roundabout at convergence of Churn Creek Road with both Victor Avenue and Rancho Road.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Churn Creek/Ranch/Victor Intersection
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$3,460
$4,550,000
$4,553,460
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23024
Traffic Impact Fees $231,350 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $3,718,650 $0 $4,550,000 Total $231,350 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $3,718,650 $0 $4,550,000 Project Development $231,350 $455,000
Construction
Total
$183,650 $20,000 $20,000 $0 $0
$0 $16,350 $180,000 $180,000 $3,718,650 $0 $4,095,000
$231,350 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $3,718,650 $0 $4,550,000 Stillwater Business Park - Phase II
Description: Improvements to Stillwater Business Park.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Stillwater Business Park
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$457,948
$9,542,052
$10,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23025
General Fund $105,906 $5,000,000 $4,436,146 $0 $0 $0 $9,542,052 Total $105,906 $5,000,000 $4,436,146 $0 $0 $0 $9,542,052 Project Development $105,906 $1,049,521
Construction
Total
$500,000 $443,615 $0 $0 $0
$0 $4,500,000 $3,992,531 $0 $0 $0 $8,492,531
$105,906 $5,000,000 $4,436,146 $0 $0 $0 $9,542,052
California St Bikeway Project
Construction of a two-way Class IV bikeway along California Street between Yuba Street and Tehama Street.

Improvements of pedestrian access by rebuilding curb ramps, creating bulb-outs, and increasing crossing visability.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
California St between Yuba and Tehama
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$712,091
$4,346,701
$5,058,791
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23030
AHSC Grant $801,701 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $801,701
Federal EDA Grant / CA $1,009,563 $1,860,437 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,870,000 SHOPP
Local Streets and Roads Fund $53,255 $621,745 $0 $0 $0 $0 $675,000 Total $1,864,519 $2,482,182 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,346,701
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,864,519 $2,482,182 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,346,701
$1,864,519 $2,482,182 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,346,701
C-35
Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Traffic Signal Modification
Description: Modification of traffic signal at various corners to support widening.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Buenaventura Blvd at Sunset Avenue
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$7,400
$52,691
$60,091
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23032
Local Streets and Roads Fund $2,897 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,897 Traffic Impact Fees $49,794 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $49,794
Total $52,691 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,691
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$52,691 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,691
$52,691 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,691
Old Alturas Road Improvements
Description: Road surfacing and service enhancement of Old Alturas Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Approaches to Old Alturas Rd Bridge over Churn Creek
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Widening
$30,982
$1,002,416
$1,033,398
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23034
Traffic Impact Fees $1,002,416 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,002,416 Total $1,002,416 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,002,416
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,002,416 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,002,416
$1,002,416 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,002,416
Shasta View North
Widening to provide one travel lane in each direction, a center turn lane, five-foot bike lanes on both sides, a five-foot sidewalk, curb and gutter on both sides, ADA curb ramps and corner bulb outs at all cross streets, driveways, storm drain pipe and catch basin relocations, asphalt concrete resurfacing and tie-ins, pavement striping and markings, signage and relocation of overhead electrical lines to underground.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Shasta View Dr from Hartnell Ave to approx. 573ft
north of Kerry Ave
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$27,162
$1,122,838
$1,150,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23035
Traffic Impact Fees $22,721 $1,100,117 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,122,838 Total $22,721 $1,100,117 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,122,838
Project Development $22,721 $150,000
Construction
Total
$127,279 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $972,838 $0 $0 $0 $0 $972,838
$22,721 $1,100,117 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,122,838
C-36
Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Butte Street Boogie
Construction of low-stress bike/walk network to connect DACs to downtown services, schools, grocery stores, regional transit center, and Bike Depot/E-Bikeshare.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Placer Street, Butte Street, and downtown West Street
& Shasta Street.

Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$19,042
$6,380,958
$6,400,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23036
State ATP Grant $140,000 $300,000 $400,000 $5,540,958 $0 $0 $6,380,958 Total $140,000 $300,000 $400,000 $5,540,958 $0 $0 $6,380,958 Project Development $140,000 $840,000
Construction
Total
$300,000 $400,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $5,540,958 $0 $0 $5,540,958
$140,000 $300,000 $400,000 $5,540,958 $0 $0 $6,380,958
Victor Improvement Project
Construction of low-stress active transportation facilities on Victor Ave, Mistletoe Lane and adjacent neighborhood streets, and encourages people to walk and bike.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Victor Avenue, Mistletoe Lane, Derby Lane, Oxford
Road, Oakdale Lane, Penn Drive, Dusty Lane, and
Canby Road.

Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$14,487
$8,975,000
$8,989,487
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23037
State Grant $225,000 $250,000 $500,000 $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $8,975,000 Total $225,000 $250,000 $500,000 $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $8,975,000 Project Development $225,000 $975,000
Construction
Total
$250,000 $500,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $8,000,000
$225,000 $250,000 $500,000 $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $8,975,000 Eastside RRX
Description: Design of an improved at-grade railroad crossing Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Eastside Road at UPRR Railroad Crossing
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$110,000
$110,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23039
Federal Section 130 Grant $10,000 $70,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $110,000 Total $10,000 $70,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $110,000
Project Development $10,000 $80,000
Construction
Total
$70,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $30,000
$10,000 $70,000 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $110,000
C-37
Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Oregon Street Sidewalk
Extend concrete box culvert for Calaboose Creek along Oregon Street from Shasta Street to Yuba Street. Fill sidewalk gaps, tie in paving and install pedestrian lighting,
Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Oregon Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvements
$13,626
$1,395,219
$1,408,845
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23041
Clean CA Grant $100,000 $1,293,684 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,393,684 Local Streets and Roads Fund $1,535 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,535 Total $101,535 $1,293,684 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,395,219
Project Development $101,535 $101,535
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $1,293,684 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,293,684
$101,535 $1,293,684 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,395,219
Calaboose Creek Core Revilatization
Design and construct road and trail improvements including frontage improvements, landscaping and angled parking spaces along the frontage with a 10’ separated trail.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Placer Rd to Lincoln on Railroad Ave, Gold St, and
Waldon St.

Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$19,405
$2,430,595
$2,450,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23042
Clean CA Grant $350,000 $100,000 $1,980,595 $0 $0 $0 $2,430,595 Total $350,000 $100,000 $1,980,595 $0 $0 $0 $2,430,595
Project Development $350,000 $450,000
Construction
Total
$100,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,980,595 $0 $0 $0 $1,980,595
$350,000 $100,000 $1,980,595 $0 $0 $0 $2,430,595
RR Ave Corridor
Description: Design, and feasibility study, of an improved, Complete street along Railroad Avenue.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Railroad Avenue from Court St to Buenaventura
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$21,355
$58,645
$80,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

PWENG23044
CRRSSA State Grant $10,000 $48,645 $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,645
Total $10,000 $48,645 $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,645
Project Development $10,000 $58,645
Construction
Total
$48,645 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$10,000 $48,645 $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,645
C-38
Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Canby Road Widening
Description: Widen Canby Road north of Browning along the west side. Includes curb, gutter, and sidewalk.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Canby Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$61,558
$300,000
$361,558
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-4226-08
Traffic Impact Fees $5,000 $25,000 $270,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000 Total $5,000 $25,000 $270,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
Project Development $5,000 $30,000
Construction
Total
$25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $270,000 $0 $0 $0 $270,000
$5,000 $25,000 $270,000 $0 $0 $0 $300,000
ADA Curb Ramps
Description: Install ADA-accessible curb ramps at various intersections throughout the city.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Widening/Extension
ST-4638-15
Federal CDBG Grant $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $450,000 Local Streets and Roads Fund $125,000 $125,000 $125,000 $0 $0 $0 $375,000 Total $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $825,000 Project Development $20,000 $82,500
Construction
Total
$20,000 $20,000 $7,500 $7,500 $7,500
$180,000 $180,000 $180,000 $67,500 $67,500 $67,500 $742,500 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $75,000 $75,000 $75,000 $825,000 Traffic Calming
Description: Install devices to reduce speeds and cut-through traffic in residential neighborhoods.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
STADM23012
Local Streets and Roads Fund $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 Traffic Impact Fees $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $1,200,000 Total $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 Project Development $5,000 $30,000
Construction
Total
$5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
$45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $45,000 $270,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $300,000 C-39
Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Streets
Pavement Maintenance
Description: Roadway surface maintenance work conducted annually on various streets.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
STADM23014
Local Streets and Roads Fund $1,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $3,000,000 $16,000,000 SB1 RMRA $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $12,000,000 Total $3,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $28,000,000 Project Development $300,000 $2,900,000
Construction
Total
$600,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000 $500,000
$2,700,000 $4,400,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $4,500,000 $25,100,000 $3,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $5,000,000 $28,000,000 Sidewalk Replacement
Description: Annual project to replace worn and/or damaged sections of existing sidewalks.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Street Improvement
STADM23016
Local Streets and Roads Fund $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 Total $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 Project Development $25,000 $150,000
Construction
Total
$25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
$225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $225,000 $1,350,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 $1,500,000 Oasis Road Specific Plan Update
Description: Update the Oasis Road Specific Plan.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
North Redding Traffic Benefit District
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Street Improvement
$0
$50,000
$50,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

ST-NRTBD-01
North Redding Traffic Benefit $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 District Fees
Total $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
Project Development $0 $50,000
Construction
Total
$0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $50,000
C-40
Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Biosolids Pyrolysis - Phase III/IV
Description: Future scale build-out for Biosolids final processing.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$3,062,465
$17,537,605
$20,600,070
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23002
Wastewater Rates $1,537,605 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $17,537,605 Total $1,537,605 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $17,537,605 Project Development $76,880 $876,880
Construction
Total
$400,000 $300,000 $100,000 $0 $0
$1,460,725 $7,600,000 $5,700,000 $1,900,000 $0 $0 $16,660,725 $1,537,605 $8,000,000 $6,000,000 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $17,537,605 Canter Court Siphon
Description:

Location:

Proposed Funding: 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$47,206
$896,053
$943,260
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23006
Wastewater Rates $296,053 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $896,053 Total $296,053 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $896,053
Project Development $29,605 $59,605
Construction
Total
$30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$266,448 $570,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $836,448
$296,053 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $896,053
Clarifier Rehab
Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$519,850
$519,850
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23008
Wastewater Rates $19,850 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $519,850
Total $19,850 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $519,850
Project Development $19,850 $19,850
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
$19,850 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $519,850
C-41
Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Magnums Remote Lining
Installation of 23,725 linear feet of sewer line in the Magnums Lane remote area. Includes rehabilitation of all existing manholes.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Lake Blvd E to Beltline Rd
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$345,761
$3,554,226
$3,899,987
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23015
Wastewater Rates $154,226 $0 $3,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,554,226 Total $154,226 $0 $3,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,554,226
Project Development $15,423 $355,423
Construction
Total
$0 $340,000 $0 $0 $0
$138,804 $0 $3,060,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,198,804
$154,226 $0 $3,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $3,554,226
Oasis Rd Replacement
Replacement of approximately 1200 feet of 8-inch diameter ABS pipe constructed in the late 1980s from manhole NY9-2 to NZ9-10 with 10-inch diameter pipe.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Oasis Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$1,050,000
$1,050,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23017
Wastewater Rates $100,000 $0 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,050,000 Total $100,000 $0 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,050,000
Project Development $100,000 $100,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $950,000
$100,000 $0 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,050,000
SWWTP Sludge Lagoons & Drying Beds
Description: Construction of sludge lagoons at Stillwater Treatment Plant Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
6475 Airport Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$4,432,571
$5,046,249
$9,478,820
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23020
Wastewater Rates $5,046,249 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,046,249
Total $5,046,249 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,046,249
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,046,249 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,046,249
$5,046,249 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,046,249
C-42
Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Trinity Street Sewer
Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Trinity Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$2,539,783
$860,217
$3,400,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23021
Wastewater Rates $860,217 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $860,217
Total $860,217 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $860,217
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$860,217 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $860,217
$860,217 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $860,217
Bisulfite Project
Description: Alternate de-chlorination chemical process for Clear Creek WWTP.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2220 Metz Road & 6475 Airport Rd
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$275,880
$275,880
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23023
Wastewater Rates $275,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,880
Total $275,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,880
Project Development $27,588 $27,588
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$248,292 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $248,292
$275,880 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $275,880
Westside Interceptor - Phase III
Expansion of the main sewer serving the west region of the City to accommodate growth. Phase III will run from Girvan Road south to the Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Girvan Road to the Clear Creek WWTP
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$1,043,324
$15,313,444
$16,356,768
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23024
Wastewater Rates $0 $14,313,444 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,313,444 Total $0 $14,313,444 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,313,444
Project Development $0 $765,672
Construction
Total
$715,672 $50,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $13,597,772 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $14,547,772
$0 $14,313,444 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $15,313,444
C-43
Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Clear Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant
Description: Ongoing major maintenance
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
WSADM23031
Wastewater Rates $900,335 $690,970 $714,580 $739,000 $764,250 $790,360 $4,599,495 Total $900,335 $690,970 $714,580 $739,000 $764,250 $790,360 $4,599,495 Project Development $45,017 $229,975
Construction
Total
$34,549 $35,729 $36,950 $38,213 $39,518
$855,319 $656,422 $678,851 $702,050 $726,038 $750,842 $4,369,521 $900,335 $690,970 $714,580 $739,000 $764,250 $790,360 $4,599,495 Stillwater Wastewater Treatment Plant
Description: Ongoing major maintenance
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
6475 Airport Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
WSADM23032
Wastewater Rates $392,309 $457,100 $472,720 $488,870 $505,580 $522,860 $2,839,439 Total $392,309 $457,100 $472,720 $488,870 $505,580 $522,860 $2,839,439 Project Development $19,615 $141,972
Construction
Total
$22,855 $23,636 $24,444 $25,279 $26,143
$372,694 $434,245 $449,084 $464,427 $480,301 $496,717 $2,697,467 $392,309 $457,100 $472,720 $488,870 $505,580 $522,860 $2,839,439 Infiltration and Inflow Control
Repair and rehabilitation of various aging sewer mains throughout the City as needed to reduce rainwater intrusion into the sewer system.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Collection System Improvement
WSADM23035
Wastewater Rates $4,907,556 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $10,907,556 Total $4,907,556 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $10,907,556 Project Development $245,378 $545,378
Construction
Total
$50,000 $50,000 $25,000 $75,000 $100,000
$4,662,178 $950,000 $950,000 $475,000 $1,425,000 $1,900,000 $10,362,178 $4,907,556 $1,000,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $1,500,000 $2,000,000 $10,907,556 C-44
Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Lift Station Improvements
Description: Repair/Rehab Lift Stations
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Citywide
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Collection System Improvement
WSADM23037
Wastewater Rates $38,938 $350,000 $375,000 $326,680 $337,840 $349,390 $1,777,848 Total $38,938 $350,000 $375,000 $326,680 $337,840 $349,390 $1,777,848 Project Development $3,894 $177,785
Construction
Total
$35,000 $37,500 $32,668 $33,784 $34,939
$35,044 $315,000 $337,500 $294,012 $304,056 $314,451 $1,600,063 $38,938 $350,000 $375,000 $326,680 $337,840 $349,390 $1,777,848 Lake Redding Interceptor I
Construct approximately 790 feet of 27" pipe, 4,710 feet of 24" pipe, and 60 feet of 21" pipe from N Market Lift Station to Elk Drive.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Lake Redding Estates
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$21,434
$5,331,026
$5,352,460
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23038
Wastewater Rates $0 $5,231,026 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,331,026 Total $0 $5,231,026 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,331,026
Project Development $0 $266,551
Construction
Total
$261,551 $5,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $4,969,475 $95,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,064,475
$0 $5,231,026 $100,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,331,026
Co-Digestion & Bio-Gas Production
Description: Construction of food waste receiving and bio-gas production facility at Clear Creek WWTP.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$12,600,000
$12,600,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23040
CalRecycle Grant $0 $10,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $10,000,000 Wastewater Rates $0 $2,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,600,000
Total $0 $12,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,600,000
Project Development $0 $520,000
Construction
Total
$520,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $12,080,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,080,000
$0 $12,600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,600,000
C-45
Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Rancho Lift Station
Description:

Location:

Proposed Funding: 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$5,378
$494,622
$500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23045
Wastewater Rates $494,622 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $494,622
Total $494,622 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $494,622
Project Development $24,731 $24,731
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$469,891 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $469,891
$494,622 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $494,622
Magnolia Sewer Repair Phase II
Description: Rehabilitation for sanitary sewer mains and lowers laterals. Includes manhole replacement and cover installation.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Magnolia Area
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$13,100,000
$13,100,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23048
Wastewater Rates $100,000 $4,400,000 $2,600,000 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $13,100,000 Total $100,000 $4,400,000 $2,600,000 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $13,100,000 Project Development $100,000 $750,000
Construction
Total
$220,000 $130,000 $300,000 $0 $0
$0 $4,180,000 $2,470,000 $5,700,000 $0 $0 $12,350,000
$100,000 $4,400,000 $2,600,000 $6,000,000 $0 $0 $13,100,000 Parkview Sewer Siphon
Description:

Location:

Proposed Funding: 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$1,164,480
$1,164,480
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WSADM23049
Wastewater Rates $1,164,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,164,480
Total $1,164,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,164,480
Project Development $116,448 $116,448
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,048,032 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,048,032
$1,164,480 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,164,480
C-46
Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Wastewater
Stillwater Business Park Sewer
Description: Installation
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Stillwater Business Park
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: One-time Collection System Improvement $3,000,000 Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-CS-26-01
Wastewater Rates $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000
Total $0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000
Project Development $0 $300,000
Construction
Total
$300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,700,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,700,000
$0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000
Lake Redding Interceptor II
Construct approximately 790 feet of 27" pipe, 4,710 feet of 24" pipe, and 60 feet of 21" pipe from N Market Lift Station to Elk Drive.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Lake Redding Estates
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Collection System Improvement
$0
$6,000,000
$6,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-P-CC-01
Wastewater Rates $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $6,000,000 Total $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $6,000,000
Project Development $0 $300,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $50,000 $250,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $950,000 $4,750,000 $0 $5,700,000
$0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 $5,000,000 $0 $6,000,000
Influent Screening
Description: Screening at influent pump station.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2220 Metz Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WW-TP-C-06
Wastewater Rates $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Total $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Project Development $0 $50,000
Construction
Total
$50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $950,000
$0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
C-47
Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Athens Area Water Main
Description: Replace 2", 6" and 8" water mains in the Athens Area with 8" PVC.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Athens Area
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$5,116,178
$1,239,098
$6,355,276
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23004
Water Rates $1,239,098 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,239,098
Total $1,239,098 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,239,098
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,239,098 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,239,098
$1,239,098 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,239,098
Cypress Booster Pump Station
Construction of a 7 MGD pump station at the existing supervisory valve. This pump station will have the ability to pump in either direction between the Foothill and Enterprise pressure zones and greatly increase the flexibility of water delivery in the distribution system.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Cypress Avenue
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$684,814
$3,501,829
$4,186,643
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23006
Water Rates $2,901,829 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,501,829
Total $2,901,829 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,501,829
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$2,901,829 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,501,829
$2,901,829 $600,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,501,829
EW 12 Wellhead Treatment
Description: Rehabilition of Well 12.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
E-Well 12
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$1,950,082
$5,649,918
$7,600,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23008
Water Rates $5,649,918 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,649,918
Total $5,649,918 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,649,918
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$5,649,918 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,649,918
$5,649,918 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,649,918
C-48
Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Forest Hills - Cascade Racquet Water Main
Description: Installation of water main
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Cascade Area
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$24,634
$1,422,867
$1,447,501
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23010
Grant $961,167 $461,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,422,867
Total $961,167 $461,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,422,867
Project Development $48,058 $71,143
Construction
Total
$23,085 $0 $0 $0 $0
$913,108 $438,615 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,351,723
$961,167 $461,700 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,422,867
Hill 900 Reservoir
Description: Determine location and construct additional reservoir.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
West Side of Redding
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$6,570
$6,205,150
$6,211,720
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23011
Water Rates $205,150 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $6,205,150 Total $205,150 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $6,205,150 Project Development $205,150 $205,150
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $6,000,000
$205,150 $0 $0 $2,000,000 $4,000,000 $0 $6,205,150
Lake Boulevard 24" - Keswick to Masonic
Description: 24" Lake Boulevard - Oasis to Northpoint (9,090 feet) Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Lake Boulevard
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$7,872,421
$562,167
$8,434,588
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23012
Water Connection Fees $112,433 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $112,433
Water Rates $449,733 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $449,733
Total $562,167 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $562,167
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$562,167 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $562,167
$562,167 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $562,167
C-49
Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
North Willis Area Water Line Replacement
Install approximately 15,000 linear feet of new 8” diameter PVC water main and over 2,000 linear feet of 12” diameter DIP water main.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
North Willis Area
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$318,112
$7,101,392
$7,419,504
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23016
Water Rates $101,392 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,101,392
Total $101,392 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,101,392
Project Development $101,392 $101,392
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,000,000
$101,392 $7,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,101,392
Water Main Improvement 2024
Description: Install approximately 8,800 linear feet of 8" and 12" water mains at various locations througout the city.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$532,657
$3,851,967
$4,384,624
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23018
Water Rates $3,851,967 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,851,967
Total $3,851,967 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,851,967
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$3,851,967 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,851,967
$3,851,967 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,851,967
Foothill Water Treatment Plant Maintenance
Description: Upgrades at the Foothill Water Treatment Plant to accommodate growth and replace aging equipment.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
3100 Foothill Boulevard
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
WAADM23019
Water Rates $1,210,580 $250,000 $258,540 $267,372 $276,506 $285,952 $2,548,950 Total $1,210,580 $250,000 $258,540 $267,372 $276,506 $285,952 $2,548,950 Project Development $60,529 $127,447
Construction
Total
$12,500 $12,927 $13,369 $13,825 $14,298
$1,150,051 $237,500 $245,613 $254,004 $262,681 $271,654 $2,421,502 $1,210,580 $250,000 $258,540 $267,372 $276,506 $285,952 $2,548,950 C-50
Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Electrical Control System Upgrades
Description: Electrical control system updates at Foothill Water Treatment Plant Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Foothill Water Treatment Plant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
WAADM23022
Water Rates $370,815 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $870,815 Total $370,815 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $870,815 Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$370,815 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $870,815 $370,815 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $100,000 $870,815 Buckeye Water Treatment Plant Maintenance
Description: Various maintenance projects at the Buckeye Water Treatment Plant.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
11501 Benson Drive/3100 Foothill Boulevard
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
WAADM23026
Water Rates $968,570 $139,064 $143,814 $148,727 $153,808 $159,062 $1,713,044 Total $968,570 $139,064 $143,814 $148,727 $153,808 $159,062 $1,713,044 Project Development $48,429 $85,652
Construction
Total
$6,953 $7,191 $7,436 $7,690 $7,953
$920,142 $132,110 $136,623 $141,291 $146,117 $151,109 $1,627,392 $968,570 $139,064 $143,814 $148,727 $153,808 $159,062 $1,713,044 Old Alturas Road
Description: Installation of 8" and 12" water mains as part of Old Alturas Road improvements.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Old Alturas Road
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$321,412
$54,438
$375,850
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23040
Water Rates $54,438 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $54,438
Total $54,438 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $54,438
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$54,438 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $54,438
$54,438 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $54,438
C-51
Packet Pg. 516 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Pump Station Improvements
Description: Various rehab/repair to pump stations.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Various
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Ongoing Treatment System
WAADM23042
Water Rates $430,961 $239,843 $248,036 $256,509 $265,272 $274,334 $1,714,953 Total $430,961 $239,843 $248,036 $256,509 $265,272 $274,334 $1,714,953 Project Development $21,548 $85,748
Construction
Total
$11,992 $12,402 $12,825 $13,264 $13,717
$409,413 $227,850 $235,634 $243,684 $252,008 $260,617 $1,629,206 $430,961 $239,843 $248,036 $256,509 $265,272 $274,334 $1,714,953 Country Oaks Water Main
Description: Replace water mains Country Oaks Area
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Country Oaks Area
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$104,014
$3,173,836
$3,277,850
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23048
Water Rates $173,836 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,173,836
Total $173,836 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,173,836
Project Development $173,836 $173,836
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,000,000
$173,836 $3,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,173,836
Buckeye Filter Repair
Description: Repair Filter at Buckeye Water Treatment Plant Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Buckeye
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$9,244
$1,119,256
$1,128,500
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23049
Water Rates $1,119,256 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,119,256
Total $1,119,256 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,119,256
Project Development $111,926 $111,926
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,007,330 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,007,330
$1,119,256 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,119,256
C-52
Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Keswick Valve Upgrades
Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Buckeye Zone
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23050
Water Rates $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Project Development $0 $150,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $150,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $1,350,000
$0 $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Canyon Bridge Water Line Replacement
Description: Installation of water main surrounding Canyon Bridge.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Canyon Bridge
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$112,500
$112,500
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23051
Water Rates $112,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $112,500
Total $112,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $112,500
Project Development $0 $0
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$112,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $112,500
$112,500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $112,500
South Street Water Line Replacement
Description: Emergency repair of broken water main in South Street at UPRR crossing, Jack & Bore method.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
South Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$14,114
$1,365,886
$1,380,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23053
Water Rates $1,365,886 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,365,886
Total $1,365,886 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,365,886
Project Development $136,589 $136,589
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$1,229,297 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,229,297
$1,365,886 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,365,886
C-53
Packet Pg. 518 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Foothill Control Building
Description: Upgrades to the Foothill Water Treatment Plant.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Foothill Water Treatment Plant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$5,000,000
$5,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

WAADM23054
Water Rates $0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
Total $0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
Project Development $0 $250,000
Construction
Total
$0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $4,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,750,000
$0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
Hill 900 to Placer
Description: Outlet pipe installation from Hill 900 Reserviours to Placer Street.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Placer Street
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$2,000,000
$2,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-01
Water Rates $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Total $0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
Project Development $0 $200,000
Construction
Total
$0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,800,000
$0 $0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
North Willis Area Water Line Replacement - Phase II
Description: Continuation of NWA Water Line Replacement project.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
North Willis Area
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$5,000,000
$5,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-02
Water Rates $0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
Total $0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
Project Development $0 $250,000
Construction
Total
$0 $250,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $4,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $4,750,000
$0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000
C-54
Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Pump House 1 Replacement
Environmental review for replacing Pump House 1 on the Sacramento River. Alternatives include rehabbing at current location or constructing a new pump house at various upstream locations.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
2300 Riverside Drive
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$5,326,533
$71,089,562
$76,416,095
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-03
SRF Loan $0 $0 $60,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $60,000,000
Water Rates $2,215,240 $8,874,322 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,089,562 Total $2,215,240 $8,874,322 $60,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $71,089,562 Project Development $2,215,240 $6,652,401
Construction
Total
$4,437,161 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $4,437,161 $60,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $64,437,161
$2,215,240 $8,874,322 $60,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $71,089,562
Ranchettes 12" Water Main
Install approximately 4,100 LF of new 12-inch piping for a second supply and redundancy to the Ranchettes Area, at the southwest end of the Cascade Zone. Install the Clear Creek crossing during Westside Wastewater Interceptor construction, while the creek is bypassed.

Description:

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Ranchettes Area
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$1,500,000
$1,500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-04
Water Rates $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Total $0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Project Development $0 $150,000
Construction
Total
$0 $150,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $1,350,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,350,000
$0 $0 $1,500,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,500,000
Foothill WTP Floc Basins & PH2
Description: Construction of Floc Basins and Pump House 2 at Foothill Water Treatment Plant.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Foothill Water Treatment Plant
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$16,250,000
$16,250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-05
Water Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,250,000 $16,250,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,250,000 $16,250,000
Project Development $0 $325,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $0 $325,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,925,000 $15,925,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,250,000 $16,250,000
C-55
Packet Pg. 520 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Fig Tree Well
Description: Construction of new well
Location:

Proposed Funding: 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 2029-30 Total Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$4,300,000
$4,300,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-06
Water Rates $0 $0 $0 $4,300,000 $0 $0 $4,300,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $4,300,000 $0 $0 $4,300,000
Project Development $0 $215,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $215,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $4,085,000 $0 $0 $4,085,000
$0 $0 $0 $4,300,000 $0 $0 $4,300,000
Pump Station 3 Upgrades
Description: Rehab and repair project for Pump Station 3.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Pump Station 3
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-07
Water Rates $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Total $0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Project Development $0 $50,000
Construction
Total
$0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $950,000 $0 $0 $0 $950,000
$0 $0 $1,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000
Linden Pump Station
Description: Rehab and repair project for Linden Pump Station Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Linden Pump Station
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$2,250,000
$2,250,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-08
Water Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,250,000 $0 $2,250,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,250,000 $0 $2,250,000
Project Development $0 $112,500
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $112,500 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $2,137,500 $0 $2,137,500
$0 $0 $0 $0 $2,250,000 $0 $2,250,000
C-56
Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Railroad Booster Pump Station
Description: Upgrades to Railroad Booster Pump Station
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Railroad Ave
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$500,000
$500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-09
Water Rates $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Total $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
Project Development $0 $25,000
Construction
Total
$0 $25,000 $0 $0 $0
$0 $0 $475,000 $0 $0 $0 $475,000
$0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $0 $500,000
S Bonnyview Pump Station Upgrades
Description: Upgrades to S Bonnyview Pump Station.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
S Bonnyview
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$1,300,000
$1,300,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-10
Water Rates $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $1,300,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $1,300,000
Project Development $0 $65,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $65,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $1,235,000 $0 $0 $1,235,000
$0 $0 $0 $1,300,000 $0 $0 $1,300,000
Buckeye 2MG Reservoir
Description: Construction of a 2MG Reservoir located in the Buckeye Zone.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Buckeye Zone
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Treatment System
$0
$5,000,000
$5,000,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-11
Water Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $5,000,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $5,000,000
Project Development $0 $400,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $400,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $4,600,000 $0 $4,600,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $5,000,000 $0 $5,000,000
C-57
Packet Pg. 522 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
Stillwater Business Park Water Main
Description: Installation of water main at Stillwater Business Park Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Stillwater Business Park
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$2,300,000
$2,300,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-12
Water Connection Fees $0 $2,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300,000 Total $0 $2,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300,000
Project Development $0 $300,000
Construction
Total
$300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
$0 $2,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000,000
$0 $2,300,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,300,000
Cascade Slip Line 12" Water Main
Description: Installation of 12" water main
Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Cascade Area
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$1,400,000
$1,400,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-13
Water Rates $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $1,400,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $1,400,000
Project Development $0 $140,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $140,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $1,260,000 $0 $0 $1,260,000
$0 $0 $0 $1,400,000 $0 $0 $1,400,000
Benton 16" Water Main
Description: Installation of a 16" water main.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
Benton Rd Area
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$500,000
$500,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-14
Water Rates $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
Project Development $0 $50,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0
$0 $0 $0 $450,000 $0 $0 $450,000
$0 $0 $0 $500,000 $0 $0 $500,000
C-58
Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Water
West/Court 12" Water Main
Description: Installation of 12" water main at the intersection of West and Court.

Location:
2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 2027-28 2028-29 Total
West/Court
Proposed Funding: 2029-30
Project #
Project Type: Distribution System
$0
$700,000
$700,000
One-time
Project Cost: Prior Years/Future Costs:

CIP Costs(detailed below)
Total Project Cost:

W-CONV-15
Water Rates $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $700,000
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $700,000
Project Development $0 $70,000
Construction
Total
$0 $0 $0 $70,000 $0
$0 $0 $0 $0 $630,000 $0 $630,000
$0 $0 $0 $0 $700,000 $0 $700,000
The Engineering Division Cost Allocation section provides an approximation of costs for the project development and construction for projects requiring the involvement of the Engineering Division. Project development costs include preliminary engineering, environmental and permitting, right-of-way, design, consultant oversight, and bidding. Construction costs include the construction contract, contract administration, inspection, and consultant oversight.

Note:

C-59
Packet Pg. 524 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Future Projects
Airports
CIP No. Project Funding Source
A-BEN-31-1 T-Hanger Taxiline Construction
A-BEN-30-1 Westside T-Hanger Taxilane Reconstruction
A-BEN-30-2 Rehab Parallel Taxiway A
A-BEN-30-4 Runway 16 Approach Obstruction Removal
A-BEN-31-2 Hangar Row A Replacement
A-BEN-31-3 Airport Beacon
A-BEN-31-4 New Hangar Development
A-BEN-31-5 AWOS System Upgrades
A-BEN-31-6 Cameras at Access Control Gates
A-BEN-36-1 Hangar Row B Replacement
A-BEN-36-2 Hangar Row C Replacement
A-BEN-36-3 FBO Building Re-Design & Construction
A-BEN-36-4 Eletrical Vault Transformer
A-BEN-36-5 Cameras at Access Control Gates
A-BEN-30-3 East Apron Pavement Rehabilitation
RFD
CIP No. Project Funding Source
RFD-2030-05 Station 1 Rebuild
RFD-2030-04 Station 8 Remodel
RFD-2030-03 Station 7 Remodel
RFD-2030-06 Station 5 Remodel
RFD-2030-02 Training Center
RFD-2030-01 Fire Station 9 Build
C-60
Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Future Projects
Streets
CIP No. Project Funding Source
ST-F-SV Shasta View Drive/College View Drive DD651506
ST-2005-51 Traffic Control Device: Hartnell Avenue - Lawrence Road DD651460 ST-2005-50 Traffic Control Device: Lake Boulevard - Panorama Drive DD651422 ST-IN-HA Church Creek/Hartmeyer Intersection DD651511
ST-IN-AL Church Creek/Alrose Intersection DD651510
ST-2005-62 Traffic Control Device: Victor Avenue - El Vista Street DD651449 ST-2005-61 Traffic Control Device: Lake Boulevard - Santa Rosa Way DD651472 ST-2005-60 Canyon Creek Road Area Improvements CCRTIF/Fund 117 ST-2005-57 Traffic Control Device: Airport Road - Meadowview Drive DD651492 ST-F-104 Shasta View Drive Extension DD650722
Water
CIP No. Project Funding Source
W-4286-01 Twin View Waterline DD651440
W-EW-01 EW11 Rehab Water Rates
W-EWT-05 EW12 to EW14 Pipeline Water Rates
W-EWT-03 EW14 Filtration Water Rates
Note: The Future Projects list includes a variety of projects that are either beyond the 5-year window of the CIP and/or do not have all funding sources identified at this time. The identified Water, Wastewater, and Traffic impact fee program projects represent the basis of the relative Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code 66000) compliant programs. Reimbursement for construction of these impact fee projects may be considered in accordance with Section 16.20.090 of the Redding Municipal Code.

C-61
Packet Pg. 526 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan) Future Projects with Impact Fee Component
CIP No. Project
Anticipated
Construction
Date Funding Source
Storm Drain
SD-2030-01 Regional Detention Ponds 2030-31 Storm Drain Impact Fees CIP No. Project
Anticipated
Construction
Date Funding Source
Streets
ST-TIF-CIX Churn Creek Road/SR 299 Interchange 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees/DD651505
ST-4226-02-2 Placer Street Improvements - Airpark to Pleasant 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees ST-TIF-VC1,2,3 Victor Avenue Widening - Hartnell to Old Alturas 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees ST-TIF-HIL Hilltop Drive Widening - River Bend Road to Browning Street 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees ST-TIF-CC1 Churn Creek Road Widening - Browning to Bodenhamer 2028-29 Traffic Impact Fees ST-TIF-RA Railroad Avenue Widening - Grandview Ave. to Schley Ave. 2030-31 Traffic Impact Fees Old Alturas Road - ROW and Roundabouts at Victor Avenue, Lema Road, and Edgewood Drive
ST-TIF-OLD 2031-32 Traffic Impact Fees
The Future Projects list includes a variety of projects that are either beyond the 5-year window of the CIP and/or do not have all funding sources identified at this time. The identified Water, Wastewater, and Traffic impact fee program projects represent the basis of the relative Mitigation Fee Act (Government Code 66000) compliant programs. Reimbursement for construction of these impact fee projects may be considered in accordance with Section 16.20.090 of the Redding Municipal Code.

Note:

C-62
Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Draft Capital Improvement Plan 2024-25 through 2029-30 (6.1--Public Hearing Regarding Capital Improvement Plan)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Accept oral report from ad hoc committee members Mayor Pro Tempore Erin Resner, and Council Member Tenessa Audette, regarding funding for the City of Redding Civic Auditorium located at 700 Auditorium Drive; and provide direction to staff.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact resulting from the formation of an ad hoc committee and subsequent discussions.

Background/Analysis
At its December 16, 2025, City Council meeting, during discussion of Item 12, Mayor Pro Tempore ERiResner suggested forming an ad hoc committee, and the Council reached consensus to do so. The ad hoc committee’s purpose is to engage with entities that may benefit from and provide financial support to the Civic Auditorium while the City evaluates its ability to offer additional funding.

At its January 6, 2026, City Council meeting, an update from the Ad Hoc Committee and Community Services Director Travis Menne was provided to Council. The updates included estimated annual costs to shutter the Civic Auditorium.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environment Quality Act, and no further action is required.

MEETING DATE: January 20, 2026
ITEM NO. 9A
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected],
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9A--Consider oral report from Ad Hoc Committee regarding funding for the Civic Auditorium.

Erin D. Resner, Mayor Pro
Tempore, Tenessa Audette,
Council Member
Packet Pg. 528
Report to Redding City Council January 16, 2026
Re: 9A--Update on Civic Auditorium Ad Hoc Committee Page 2 City Manager Goals/Objectives
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Packet Pg. 529

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
This is an item put forth by Council Member Audette, recommending that Council be presented with information pertaining to the City of Redding Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion for Fiscal Years (FYs) 2026 and 2027. As this is an item put forth by an individual Council Member, staff have no recommendations regarding this item other than considering Agenda Item No. 9.1(b) in conjunction.

Fiscal Impact
Fiscal impact will be dependent upon the direction provided by Council.

Alternative Action
City Council (Council) could choose to move forward with Council Member Audette’s recommendation or provide an alternative direction to staff. Additionally, Council may request additional or modified information for future discussion regarding this item.

Background/Analysis
On November 18, 2025, Council requested a budget workshop to review revenue updates, revenue assumptions, and an analysis of expenditures rolled back to 2018 levels. In preparation for the workshop originally scheduled for December 18, 2025, staff developed dashboards for the requested information.

This agenda item focuses on a discussion of General Fund revenues to determine whether the assumptions used during the budget development process should be revised and, if so, to what extent.

MEETING DATE: January 20, 2026
ITEM NO. 9B
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9B--City of Redding Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion for FY 26 & FY 27.

Tenessa Audette, Council
Member
Packet Pg. 530
Report to Redding City Council January 16, 2026
Re: 9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27 Page 2 The attached information is intended to provide Council with sufficient detail to offer direction on any updates of revenue assumptions to be used to update the adopted budget.

The dashboards were grouped in a way to help facilitate conversation. The revenue grouping on the attached dashboards is as follows: Sales Tax, Property Tax, TOT, Cannabis Tax & Other Taxes, Internal Departments & Transfers, Public Safety Revenue, Development Services revenues, community services revenues, and miscellaneous & other revenues.

Below are the adopted budget revenues by category in the General Fund 10-Year Plan for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026 & 2027.

FY 2026 FY 2027
Revenues
Sales Tax 31,368 31,995
Property Tax 30,560 31,500
TOT 7,570 7,873
Cannabis Tax 1,939 2,016
Other Taxes 2,750 2,750
Licenses & Permits 2,695 2,823
Fines & Penalties 791 811
Other Government 3,494 2,307
Internal Departments
PILOT 5,998 6,894
Utility Street Impacts 1,510 1,560
Cost Allocation 4,463 4,597
NPDES Allocation 592 612
PW Admin Allocation 756 794
Service Charges 5,179 5,299
Other Revenues 2,332 2,338
Use of Money & Property 825 829
Transfers In
Gas Tax 10,086 10,151
Other Transfers In 523 523
Transfers Out
Visit Redding & Convention Center (750) (756)
Library (1,055) (1,086)
Parking (38)
Rolling Stock & Equipment (1,103) (1,079)
Internal Loan Payments (72) (72)
TOTAL REVENUES 110,413 112,679
While the attached revenue information is grouped differently it provides details into each of the revenues, how they are collected, how they were forecasted, how they are utilized, and other important context.

Packet Pg. 531
Report to Redding City Council January 16, 2026
Re: 9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27 Page 3 Many of these revenues are legally or operationally restricted to specific purposes and are not fully discretionary. If such a revenue source were reduced or eliminated, the Council would either need to increase General Fund support or reduce the associated expenditures, which would likely result in a lower level of service. Maintaining these revenues helps avoid additional General Fund impact.

Examples include Development Services and Recreation revenues, which function as partial cost-recovery mechanisms. For FY 2026, the Council previously set the General Fund subsidy for Development Services at approximately $1.3 million, recognizing that not all costs can be recovered through fees. Similarly, Recreation and the aquatic center collectively require an estimated $1.5 million General Fund subsidy.

It is important for Council to recognize that revenues and expenditures must be evaluated in context, as not all revenues have the same relationship to service costs or General Fund impact.

As part of the budget development process, the Council directed staff to increase several fee-forservice revenues. Due to the timing of these changes, first-quarter results may not accurately reflect expected revenue performance once the increases are fully implemented. This applies to revenues such as the Cannabis Tax, development services fees, and recreation fees.

When discussing revenues, it is important to distinguish between those that are restricted to specific uses and those that are fully discretionary. The revenues in the first chart with associated expenditures include licenses and permits, other government revenues, Utility Street Impacts, Cost Allocation Plan charges, NPDES allocation, Public Works administration allocation, service charges, and other revenues.

The remaining revenues, listed below, are discretionary and support Council’s broader budget decisions.

FY 2026 FY 2027
Discretionary Revenue Sources
Sales Tax 31,368 31,995
Property Tax 30,560 31,500
TOT 7,570 7,873
Cannabis Tax 1,939 2,016
Other Taxes 2,750 2,750
Fines & Penalties 791 811
PILOT 5,998 6,894
Late Fees 1,700 1,700
Use of Money & Property 825 829
TOTAL DISCRETIONARY REVENUE 83,501 86,368
Additionally, certain items are recorded as “transfer out” revenues for governmental accounting purposes but function more like expenditures from a budget and policy perspective. These items are listed below for Council’s reference.

Packet Pg. 532
Report to Redding City Council January 16, 2026
Re: 9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27 Page 4 Transfers Out FY 2026 FY 2027
Visit Redding & Convention Center (750) (756)
Library (1,055) (1,086)
Parking (38)
Rolling Stock & Equipment (1,103) (1,079)
Internal Loan Payments (72) (72)
TOTAL TRANSFER OUT (3,018) (2,993)
Interim Expenditure Controls
In light of current budgetary revenue shortfalls, staff are in the process of implementing interim expenditure controls potentially including (but not limited to) a hiring freeze and restrictions in overtime and expenditures across all City Departments as necessary to minimize impacts to the General Fund.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balance and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Attachments
^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26
Packet Pg. 533
Background & Information
Sales Tax is paid monthly from California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA). The first and third months of each quarter are paid using estimates, with minor previous period cleanups received as well. The second month following the close of each quarter is the true up for the quarter ending, which is August, November, February, and May.

Citizens within Redding pay 7.25% on taxable purchases, which is broadly applicable to retail sales unless there is a specific exemption for the item being purchased, a few examples are groceries, prescription medicines, and services. The City of Redding only receives a portion of the 7.25% known as the Bradley Burns Tax. Below is the regulatory breakdown of the 7.25%.
 3.6875% - Goes to State General Fund under Revenue & Taxation Code Sections 6051 & 6201  .25% - Goes to State General Fund under Revenue & Taxation Code Sections 6051.3 & 6201.3  .50% - Goes to Local Public Safety Fund to Support Local criminal justice activities (1993). Received by Shasta County, City of Redding has received approximately $272,520 since this was implemented in 1993. Applicable under Section 35, Aritcle XIII of the State Constitution.  .50% - Goes to Local Revenue Fund to support local health and social services programs (1991 Realignment). Received by Shasta County. Applicable under Revenue & Taxation Code Sections 6051.2 & 6201.2.
 1.0625% - Goes to Local Revenue Fund 2011. Received by Shasta County under Revenue & Taxation Code Section 6051.15 & 6201.15.
 .25% - Goes to County Transportation Funds.
 1.00% - Goes to City or county operations. This is the amount received by The City under Revenue & Taxation Code Sections 7202 & 7203.

The tax received by the City is collected on Point of Sale. Certain sales including online sales are placed into the County pool which is then divided amongst the jurisdictions within the county based on their percentage of the County Pool. The County Pool is weighted based on the volume of brick and mortar sales within each jurisdiction.

The City receives 70-75% of the County Pool most quarters.

Most online sales are placed in the County Pool. One major exception of online sales is related to fulfillment centers within California. In recent years sales tax related to online sales which are fulfilled from a fulfillment center are reported to the jurisdiction of the fulfillment center.

Sales Tax Revenue
Packet Pg. 534
1 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Actual Sales Tax Results Fiscal Year 2015 thru 2025
Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below. The Fiscal Year 2025 number was not known during the budget development process for FY 2026 & 2027.

Below is a chart showing the actual sales tax results in dollars year over year.

Below is a chart showing the change year over year as a percentage.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2015 21,957$
FY 2016 22,314$ 1.63%
FY 2017 22,854$ 2.42%
FY 2018 23,803$ 4.15%
FY 2019 25,319$ 6.37%
FY 2020 25,859$ 2.13%
FY 2021 30,189$ 16.74%
FY 2022 32,089$ 6.29%
FY 2023 30,258$ -5.71%
FY 2024 30,753$ 1.64%
FY 2025 30,253$ -1.63%
$-
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 Packet Pg. 535
2 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) This graph shows the volatility that has started from FY 2021 to FY 2025. Looking at the average Sales Tax growth from 2015 to 2020 returns an average of 3.34% and from 2021 to 2025 an average of 3.47%. However, where the story becomes more interesting to see the differences in standard deviation. Standard deviation is the measurement of the amount of variation of values relative to the mean. The standard deviation from 2015 to 2020 was 1.74% whereas the standard deviation from 2020 to 2025 is 7.72%. This illustrates the difficulty in forecasting that has been present since 2020. This is an important consideration for Council as we work on refining the updated forecast in light of the information received since the budget workshops and adoption.

Adopted Budget Fiscal Year 2026 & 2027
The chart and graph below show the budgeted sales tax forecast as adopted.

The below is a graphical representation of the sales tax forecast.

1.63%

2.42%

4.15%

6.37%

2.13%

16.74%

6.29%
-5.71%

1.64%
-1.63%
-10.00%
-5.00%

0.00%

5.00%

10.00%

15.00%

20.00%
FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 30,753$ 0.00%
FY 2026 31,368$ 2.00%
FY 2027 31,995$ 2.00%
FY 2028 32,795$ 2.50%
FY 2029 33,615$ 2.50%
FY 2030 34,456$ 2.50%
FY 2031 35,317$ 2.50%
Packet Pg. 536
3 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) FY 2026 & 2027 Forecast & Sensitivity
In order to accurately forecast the FY 2026, FY 2027, and thereafter it is important to forecast FY 2025 which was done in March of 2025 prior to the completion of the Fiscal Year. As a result of discussing the Revenue assumption it is important to measure the actual results of FY 2025 as part of this update process. During the Biennial Budget development process it was forecasted that Sales Tax would be flat from FY 2024 to FY 2025, which would have been $30,753 but the actual Sales Tax was $30,253.

Staff is presenting three potential scenarios as depicted below. It is important to remember the volatility that has been demonstrated in recent years from Sales Tax with volatility increasing exponentially, which is adding to the difficulty in forecasting the Sales Tax.
$28,000
$29,000
$30,000
$31,000
$32,000
$33,000
$34,000
$35,000
$36,000
FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 $20,000
$22,000
$24,000
$26,000
$28,000
$30,000
$32,000
$34,000
$36,000
FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 Actual Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
Packet Pg. 537
4 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Scenario 1 (Budget) –
Given the information received since the budget forecasts were created this scenario has likely become the top end of potential expectations. This would include truing up FY 2025 to the actual amount received as discussed above and then using the approved assumptions as part of the adopted budget, which included a 2% increase in FY 2026 & FY 2027, and 2.5% thereafter.

Below shows the projection, % Increase YoY, dollar value change from adopted, and the % change relative to the adopted budget.

This scenario would continue to use the same adopted assumption but updated the starting number for FY 2025 to the actual amount. This would result in approximately $500,000 per year growing to almost $1.25 million by year 6 without changing any of the future assumptions. This scenario still has high risk because through September Sales Tax was below the forecast by 10% and down year over year by approximately 7%. This was largely due to one-time adjustments and we were told that economically through June 2025 the City was flat. It is important to note that this is only 3 months of data for FY 2026.

Thru November Sales Tax is down 1.78% year over year, and approximately 8% to budget. Sales Tax received thru November was $12,430,975 compared to a forecast of $13,524,000, which is $1,093,025 below forecast and $224,687 down year over year thru November.

Scenario 2 (Middle) –
This scenario updates FY 2025 to $30,253 just the same as the scenario above but then projects that FY 2026 will be down two percent year over year from this amount. Given the recovery thru November as outlined above only being down 1.78% there is reason to believe it is trending the right direction and that the one-time adjustments were the reason for the first quarter results.

Additionally, this scenario uses a new lower growth rate assumption of 1.5% per year. This is due to a changing environment of sales tax largely impacted by the impacts of inflation and changing demographic information.

This is in line with the current forecasts received by MuniServices, who is the City’s Sales Tax consultant and provides Sales Tax forecasts.

Below shows the projection, % Increase YoY, dollar value change from adopted, and the % change relative to the adopted budget.

Fiscal Year Adopted Scenario 1 % Increase YoY $ Change % Change Budget FY 2025 $ 30,753 30,253$ (500)$
FY 2026 $ 31,368 30,858$ 2.00% (510)$ -1.63%
FY 2027 $ 31,995 31,475$ 2.00% (520)$ -1.63%
FY 2028 $ 32,795 32,105$ 2.50% (691)$ -2.11%
FY 2029 $ 33,615 32,747$ 2.50% (868)$ -2.58%
FY 2030 $ 34,456 33,402$ 2.50% (1,054) $ -3.06%
FY 2031 $ 35,317 34,070$ 2.50% (1,247) $ -3.53%
Packet Pg. 538
5 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Scenario 3 (Downside) –
This scenario shows the 7% down year over year relative to actual FY 2025 to FY 2026 and then returning to the adopted budget assumptions thereafter. Given the recovery thru November this would be an extremely conservative approach but would provide downside flexibility in the early years as the City attempts to find the bottom of the Sales Tax revenue. This scenario could protect against potential downside as a result of an economic recession.

Below shows the projection, % Increase YoY, dollar value change from adopted, and the % change relative to the adopted budget.

Additional Information –
Below is a table of a standard 5% up & down from Scenario 2. This gives Council a sense of the impact but this is importantly not compounded - it is 5% measured by each year individually. As noted earlier in the presentation the volatility on the range of outcomes of Sales Tax has increased in the past 5 years.

The value of a 1% miss in any given individual year is approximately $300K. As illustrated in the chart 5% is $1.5 million in the early years and $1.6 million by year 6. This is an important reminder to Council that inherently the risk of missing the sales tax projection by only 5%, which means the forecast would be 95% accurate could result in an additional or less revenue by $1.5 Million. Fiscal Year Adopted Scenario 2 % Increase YoY $ Change % Change Budget FY 2025 $ 30,753 30,253$ (500)$
FY 2026 $ 31,368 29,648$ -2.00% (1,720) $ -5.48%
FY 2027 $ 31,995 30,093$ 1.50% (1,903) $ -5.95%
FY 2028 $ 32,795 30,544$ 1.50% (2,251) $ -6.86%
FY 2029 $ 33,615 31,002$ 1.50% (2,613) $ -7.77%
FY 2030 $ 34,456 31,467$ 1.50% (2,988) $ -8.67%
FY 2031 $ 35,317 31,939$ 1.50% (3,378) $ -9.56%
Fiscal Year Adopted Scenario 3 % Increase YoY $ Change % Change Budget FY 2025 30,753$ 30,253$ (500)$
FY 2026 31,368$ 28,135$ -7.00% (3,233) $ -10.31%
FY 2027 31,995$ 28,698$ 2.00% (3,297) $ -10.31%
FY 2028 32,795$ 29,415$ 2.50% (3,380) $ -10.31%
FY 2029 33,615$ 30,151$ 2.50% (3,464) $ -10.31%
FY 2030 34,456$ 30,905$ 2.50% (3,551) $ -10.31%
FY 2031 35,317$ 31,677$ 2.50% (3,640) $ -10.31%
Fiscal Year 5% Down Baseline 5% Up
FY 2025 30,253$ 31,766 28,740
FY 2026 29,648$ 31,130 28,166
FY 2027 30,093$ 31,597 28,588
FY 2028 30,544$ 32,071 29,017
FY 2029 31,002$ 32,552 29,452
FY 2030 31,467$ 33,041 29,894
FY 2031 31,939$ 33,536 30,342
Packet Pg. 539
6 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27)

Background & Information
Property Tax is collected from citizens and distributed to the City of Redding (City) by Shasta County. These payments are made after collection from the County. Most of the property tax is received from the County in January and May. There are smaller amounts paid in other months for specific aspects of the property tax.

The base rate of property tax is set to a maximum of 1% of the property’s assessed value. There can be additional levies for bonds and special assessments that increase the effective tax rate. However, the portion of the tax rate paid and received by the general fund is 1% of the property’s assessed value.

Proposition 13 and AB 8 have set certain limitations on valuations and distribution schedules of Property Tax by the County. The historical allocation base was set through AB 8, which set the allocation to the local agencies based on their average property tax revenue in the three years preceding FY 1978-79, when proposition 13 was adopted. Each year thereafter, counties have allocated property tax according to this schedule from the prior year and modifying it for the proportionate share of growth in tax revenues resulting from increases in assessed value in the jurisdiction.

Actual Property Tax Results Fiscal Year 2015 thru 2025
Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below. The Fiscal Year 2025 number was not known during the budget development process for FY 2026 & 2027.

Below is a chart showing the actual property tax results in dollars year over year.

Fiscal Year Actual % Change
FY 2015 17,281$
FY 2016 18,192$ 5.27%
FY 2017 18,184$ -0.04%
FY 2018 19,260$ 5.92%
FY 2019 19,949$ 3.58%
FY 2020 21,328$ 6.91%
FY 2021 22,821$ 7.00%
FY 2022 24,285$ 6.42%
FY 2023 26,410$ 8.75%
FY 2024 28,392$ 7.50%
FY 2025 29,751$ 4.79%
Property Tax Revenue
Packet Pg. 540
7 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Below is a chart showing the change, year over year, as a percentage.

Property tax has increased by an average 5.61% since 2015. This revenue has seen one year where it effectively did not grow and all other years are between 3.58% and 8.75%. The standard deviation or range of potential outcomes is much smaller compared to sales tax. Meaning that the projections and confidence level are easier to achieve.
$-
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 -1.00%

0.00%

1.00%

2.00%

3.00%

4.00%

5.00%

6.00%

7.00%

8.00%

9.00%

10.00%
FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 Packet Pg. 541
8 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Adopted Budget Fiscal Year 2026 & 2027

The chart and graph below show the budgeted property tax forecast as adopted.

The below is a graphical representation of the property tax forecast.

Updated FY 2026 & 2027 Forecast & Sensitivity
As a part of updating the forecast the FY 2026, FY 2027, and thereafter it is important to remember FY 2025 was done in March of 2025 prior to the completion of the Fiscal Year. As a result of discussing the Revenue assumption it is important to measure the Actual results of FY 2025 as part of this update process. During the Biennial Budget development process it was forecasted that Property Tax would be up 4.5% from FY 2024 to FY 2025, which would have been $29,670 but the actual Property Tax was $29,751.

Fiscal Year Budget % Change
FY 2025 $ 29,670 4.50%
FY 2026 $ 30,560 3.00%
FY 2027 $ 31,477 3.00%
FY 2028 $ 32,421 3.00%
FY 2029 $ 33,393 3.00%
FY 2030 $ 34,395 3.00%
FY 2031 $ 35,427 3.00%
$26,000
$27,000
$28,000
$29,000
$30,000
$31,000
$32,000
$33,000
$34,000
$35,000
$36,000
FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 Packet Pg. 542
9 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Scenario 1 (Upside) –
This scenario relies on the historical averages and assumes that after the current year update to approximately 4% based on the Assessor Report released recently from Shasta County. The increase should be slightly above 4% based on the report. After this year this scenario would leverage 5% in line with the historical averages noted earlier in the write up. This scenario is in line with historical averages but has risk because it presents an option that could easily not be met causing future reductions to the budget and/or revenue assumptions as a result of missed forecasts. Given the current state of the General Fund it would not be prudent to have overly optimistic scenarios approved.

Below shows the projection, % Increase YoY, dollar value change from adopted, and the % change relative to the adopted budget.

Scenario 2 (Middle) –
This scenario updates FY 2025 to $29,751, the same as the scenario above but then says that FY 2026 will grow by 4% based on the information from the Assessor Report as above. However, after FY 2026 it returns to the budget assumption of 3% growth per year.

Given the historical tax growth in this revenue this scenario is far below the averages and presents mitigation of risk to City operations by assuming a more moderate rate of growth in the future.

Below shows the projection, % Increase YoY, dollar value change from adopted, and the % change relative to the adopted budget.
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
FY
2020
FY
2021
FY
2022
FY
2023
FY
2024
FY
2025
FY
2026
FY
2027
FY
2028
FY
2029
FY
2030
FY
2031
Actual Adopted Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3
Fiscal Year Adopted Scenario 1 % Increase YoY $ Change % Change Budget FY 2025 $ 29,670 $ 29,751 $ 81
FY 2026 $ 30,560 $ 30,941 4.00% 381 $ 1.25%
FY 2027 $ 31,477 $ 32,488 5.00% 1,012 $ 3.21%
FY 2028 $ 32,421 $ 34,112 5.00% 1,692 $ 5.22%
FY 2029 $ 33,393 $ 35,818 5.00% 2,425 $ 7.26%
FY 2030 $ 34,395 $ 37,609 5.00% 3,214 $ 9.34%
FY 2031 $ 35,427 $ 39,489 5.00% 4,062 $ 11.47%
Packet Pg. 543
10 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Scenario 3 (Downside) –
The final scenario presented shows a potential downside risk where Property Tax starts to grow and a much slower rate in the coming years. It utilizes the FY 2025 and FY 2026 information the same as Scenario 1 & 2 but instead moves the long-term growth rate to 2%. While this further mitigates the risk of projecting too high it presents a risk of artificially lowering revenue assumptions and having to make additional cuts despite a high likelihood revenue will exceed these projections. This scenario again could be used to mitigate against any downside risk present in the local economy and avoid future uncertainties regarding levels of service.

Below shows the projection, % Increase YoY, dollar value change from adopted, and the % change relative to the adopted budget.

Additional Information –
Below is a table of a standard 5% up & down from Scenario 2. This gives council a sense of the impact but this is importantly not compounded it is 5% measured by each year individually. As noted earlier this revenue is not as volatile and has a more predictable range of outcomes.

The value of a 1% miss in any given individual year is approximately $300K. As illustrated in the chart 5% is $1.5 million in the early years and $1.8 million by year 6. This is an important reminder to Council that inherently the risk of missing the property tax projection by only 5%, which means the forecast would be 95% accurate could result in an additional or less revenue by $1.5 Million.

Fiscal Year Adopted Scenario 2 % Increase YoY $ Change % Change Budget FY 2025 $ 29,670 $ 29,751 $ 81
FY 2026 $ 30,560 $ 30,941 4.00% 381 $ 1.25%
FY 2027 $ 31,477 $ 31,869 3.00% 393 $ 1.25%
FY 2028 $ 32,421 $ 32,825 3.00% 405 $ 1.25%
FY 2029 $ 33,393 $ 33,810 3.00% 417 $ 1.25%
FY 2030 $ 34,395 $ 34,824 3.00% 429 $ 1.25%
FY 2031 $ 35,427 $ 35,869 3.00% 442 $ 1.25%
Fiscal Year Adopted Scenario 3 % Increase YoY $ Change % Change Budget FY 2025 $ 29,670 $ 29,751 $ 81
FY 2026 $ 30,560 $ 30,941 4.00% 381 $ 1.25%
FY 2027 $ 31,477 $ 31,560 2.00% 83 $ 0.26%
FY 2028 $ 32,421 $ 32,191 2.00% (230) $ -0.71%
FY 2029 $ 33,393 $ 32,835 2.00% (559) $ -1.67%
FY 2030 $ 34,395 $ 33,492 2.00% (904) $ -2.63%
FY 2031 $ 35,427 $ 34,161 2.00% (1,266) $ -3.57%
Fiscal Year 5% Down Baseline 5% Up
FY 2025 28,263 $ 29,751 31,239
FY 2026 29,394 $ 30,941 32,488
FY 2027 30,276 $ 31,869 33,463
FY 2028 31,184 $ 32,825 34,467
FY 2029 32,120 $ 33,810 35,501
FY 2030 33,083 $ 34,824 36,566
FY 2031 34,076 $ 35,869 37,663
Packet Pg. 544
11 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27)

Background & Information
Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) is charged through Chapter 4.12 of the Redding Municipal code to charge anyone who is occupying lodging for 30 consecutive calendar days or less. This means that a person can be a transient if they stay in a house, hotel, motel, campground, or RV Park to name a few. There are special regulations regarding Short Term Rentals of personal residence that have been adopted by Council under Redding Municipal Code (RMC) Chapter 18.43.180, Short Term Rentals are responsible to pay TOT.

TOT is charged on the stays as outlined above at a rate of 10% based on the rent charged for the privilege of occupancy by a transient. There are select exemptions outlined in the RMC. Operators of the above are required to collect the tax from guests and remit it with the TOT tax form to the City’s Finance Department within 20 days of the close of each month.

Actual Property Tax Results Fiscal Year 2015 thru 2025
Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below. The Fiscal Year 2025 number was not known during the budget development process for FY 2026 & 2027.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2015 $ 4,358
FY 2016 $ 4,612 5.83%
FY 2017 $ 4,794 3.95%
FY 2018 $ 5,124 6.88%
FY 2019 $ 6,837 33.43%
FY 2020 $ 5,352 -21.72%
FY 2021 $ 5,916 10.54%
FY 2022 $ 8,262 39.66%
FY 2023 $ 7,243 -12.33%
FY 2024 $ 7,210 -0.46%
FY 2025 $ 7,190 -0.28%
Transient Occupancy Tax
Revenue
Packet Pg. 545
12 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Below is a chart showing the actual TOT results in dollars year over year.

Below is a chart showing the change year over year as a percentage.

TOT has increased by an average 6.55% since 2015. As can be noted in the chart above this revenue is extremely volatile in the recent years. Given the size of this revenue the impacts of a miss are not as substantive as Property Tax or Sales Tax because the revenue is only approximately $7.2 million per year. The range of potential outcomes or standard deviation on this revenue is extremely high. Meaning that the projections and confidence $-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
FY 2015 FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 -30.00%
-20.00%
-10.00%

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%
FY 2016 FY 2017 FY 2018 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 Packet Pg. 546
13 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) level are much lower and can have a wide range of results. While the City collects the revenue, it does not get data relative to the types of stays or why there can be such wild fluctuations but in 2018 & 2019 there was significant fire activity in the North State which drove significant increases to TOT. Followed by COVID in 2020 & 2021 and then the rebound after COVID.

Adopted Budget Fiscal Year 2026 & 2027

The chart and graph below show the budgeted property tax forecast as adopted.

The below is a graphical representation of the property tax forecast.

Updated FY 2026 & 2027 Forecast & Sensitivity
Thru November the actual revenue is $3,777,088 compared to a staff cash flow projection of $3,725,300. This shows that currently revenue is trending as anticipated. As outlined previously the long term growth assumption is 4%. This assumption has been used for over 15 years as part of the General Fund 10-Year Plan General Revenue growth assumption. Below are three potential scenarios for consideration.

Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 $ 7,279
FY 2026 $ 7,570 4.00%
FY 2027 $ 7,873 4.00%
FY 2028 $ 8,188 4.00%
FY 2029 $ 8,515 4.00%
FY 2030 $ 8,856 4.00%
FY 2031 $ 9,210 4.00%
$-
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
$5,000
$6,000
$7,000
$8,000
$9,000
$10,000
FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 Packet Pg. 547
14 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Scenario 1 (Upside) –
Scenario 1 presents an option of using the actual for FY 2025 and increasing it by 5% thereafter. This would be an upside scenario long term. This would increase risk while the historical average is 6.55% it is extremely volatile and has large swings up and down. Because of this wide swing it would be risky to use an assumption close to average for a long period of time. While the current year is exceeding forecast through November it does not mean that this will sustain for a long period of time.

Scenario 2 (Middle) –
Scenario 2 is the adopted budget amount. The actual results through November are in line with this activity.

This utilizes a 4% long-term assumption as has been used for a long time within the long-term financial plans of the City. There is some positive reasons to believe this assumption in the short and long term could be viable as the City has a planned half Iron Man event, which should boost TOT in future years. While there is risk to this scenario as outlined below the consequences of a miss on this revenue are much smaller. A 95% accuracy plus or minus only means $364K whereas with Sales and Property Tax the ramifications were over $1.5 Million.

Scenario 3 (Downside) –
Scenario 3 presents a flat from FY 2025 to FY 2026 and then lowers the long-term growth assumption to 3%.

The current trends through November would suggest that this is an extremely conservative assumption for FY 2026. The lowering of the long-term assumption would be more than half the historical growth rate but as previously discussed this growth rate while high is highly unreliable because of the large fluctuations.

Fiscal Year Adopted Scenario 1 % Increase YoY $ Change % Change Budget FY 2025 $ 7,279 $ 7,190 $ (89)
FY 2026 $ 7,570 $ 7,550 5.00% (21) $ -0.27%
FY 2027 $ 7,873 $ 7,927 5.00% 54 $ 0.69%
FY 2028 $ 8,188 $ 8,323 5.00% 135 $ 1.65%
FY 2029 $ 8,515 $ 8,739 5.00% 224 $ 2.63%
FY 2030 $ 8,856 $ 9,176 5.00% 320 $ 3.62%
FY 2031 $ 9,210 $ 9,635 5.00% 425 $ 4.61%
Fiscal Year Adopted Scenario 2 % Increase YoY $ Change % Change Budget FY 2025 $ 7,279 $ 7,279 $ -
FY 2026 $ 7,570 $ 7,570 4.00% $ - 0.00%
FY 2027 $ 7,873 $ 7,873 4.00% $ - 0.00%
FY 2028 $ 8,188 $ 8,188 4.00% $ - 0.00%
FY 2029 $ 8,515 $ 8,515 4.00% $ - 0.00%
FY 2030 $ 8,856 $ 8,856 4.00% $ - 0.00%
FY 2031 $ 9,210 $ 9,210 4.00% $ - 0.00%
Fiscal Year Adopted Scenario 3 % Increase YoY $ Change % Change Budget FY 2025 $ 7,279 $ 7,190 $ (89)
FY 2026 $ 7,570 $ 7,190 0.00% (380) $ -5.02%
FY 2027 $ 7,873 $ 7,406 3.00% (467) $ -5.94%
FY 2028 $ 8,188 $ 7,628 3.00% (560) $ -6.84%
FY 2029 $ 8,515 $ 7,857 3.00% (659) $ -7.74%
FY 2030 $ 8,856 $ 8,092 3.00% (764) $ -8.62%
FY 2031 $ 9,210 $ 8,335 3.00% (875) $ -9.50%
Packet Pg. 548
15 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Additional Information –
Below is a table of a standard 5% up & down from Scenario 2. This gives Council a sense of the impact but this is importantly not compounded it is 5% measured by each year individually. As noted earlier this revenue is not as volatile and has a more predictable range of outcomes.

The value of a 1% miss in any given individual year is approximately $75K. As illustrated in the chart 5% is $364,000 in the early years and $461,000 by year 6. This is an important reminder to Council that inherently the risk of missing the TOT projection by only 5%, which means the forecast would be 95% accurate could result in an additional or less revenue by $461,000. This is less impactful then the level of risk present in missing the Property Tax or Sales Tax projection.

Fiscal Year 5% Down Baseline 5% Up
FY 2025 6,915 $ 7,279 7,643
FY 2026 7,192 $ 7,570 7,949
FY 2027 7,479 $ 7,873 8,267
FY 2028 7,778 $ 8,188 8,597
FY 2029 8,090 $ 8,515 8,941
FY 2030 8,413 $ 8,856 9,299
FY 2031 8,750 $ 9,210 9,671
Packet Pg. 549
16 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27)

Background & Information
Cannabis Tax was approved by the voters in 2018. It is codified under Redding Municipal Code section 4.10. This sets the rates and ranges of rates for the different approved Cannabis uses within the City. This tax is collected by the City Finance Division in coordination with the Treasurer’s Division. In March of 2025 Council approved an increase to the Cannabis Tax rates on the different types of approved activities.

Other Taxes includes Business Licenses, Franchise Taxes, and Real Property Taxes. These are collected through a variety of different forms and currently the City receives approximately $2.5 Million per year from all of these sources.

Actual Cannabis Tax Results Fiscal Year 2015 thru 2025
Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below. The Fiscal Year 2025 number was not known during the budget development process for FY 2026 & 2027.

Below is a chart showing the actual Cannabis Tax & Other results in dollars year over year.

Fiscal Year Other Taxes % Change Cannabis Taxes % Change FY 2020 2,426 797
FY 2021 2,610 7.58% 1,961 146.05%
FY 2022 2,747 5.25% 2,197 12.03%
FY 2023 2,678 -2.51% 1,809 -17.66%
FY 2024 2,600 -2.91% 1,630 -9.89%
FY 2025 2,486 -4.38% 1,504 -7.73%
Cannabis & Other Tax Revenue
Packet Pg. 550
17 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Below is a chart showing the change year over year as a percentage.

Adopted Budget Fiscal Year 2026 & 2027

Cannabis was increased to reflect the increases to the Cannabis Tax rates approved by Council on March 4, 2025.

The new tax rates increased as follows:
• Square Footage on Cultivation - $3 per square foot -> $5 per square foot. Representing a 67% increase of cultivation revenue.
• Cannabis Retail – 5% of gross retail sales -> 6% of gross retail sales. Representing a 20% increase of retail revenue.
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Other Taxes Cannabis Taxes
-40.00%
-20.00%

0.00%

20.00%

40.00%

60.00%

80.00%
100.00%
120.00%
140.00%
160.00%
180.00%
FY 2021 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025
Other Taxes Cannabis Taxes
Packet Pg. 551
18 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) • Other Commercial – 3% of other commercial cannabis sales -> 4% of other commercial cannabis sales.

Representing a 25% increase of other commercial revenue.

Cultivation makes up 20.39% of the total cannabis tax revenue. Retail Cannabis tax revenue makes up 79.07% of the total cannabis tax revenue. Commercial makes up .54% of the total cannabis tax revenue.

Staff used these increases to estimate the impact to the tax revenues. It is important to note that this was based on historical averages of revenue performance and growing by this impact.

The chart and graph below show the budgeted cannabis and other tax forecast as adopted.

The below is a graphical representation of the cannabis and other tax forecast.

Updated FY 2026 & 2027 Forecast & Sensitivity
These revenue sources have underperformed relative to expectations thru the first five months but this is somewhat due to the implementation of the Cannabis Tax increase. While Cannabis Tax has seen steady decreases the increases to the tax rate were forecasted to increase revenue based on the prior year performance. Staff is presenting three scenarios for consideration.

Fiscal Year Other Taxes % Change Cannabis Taxes % Change FY 2025 $ 2,600 $ 1,504
FY 2026 $ 2,750 5.77% 1,939 $ 28.92%
FY 2027 $ 2,750 0.00% 2,016 $ 3.97%
FY 2028 $ 2,860 4.00% 2,097 $ 4.00%
FY 2029 $ 2,974 4.00% 2,181 $ 4.00%
FY 2030 $ 3,093 4.00% 2,268 $ 4.00%
FY 2031 $ 3,217 4.00% 2,358 $ 4.00%
$-
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 Other Taxes Cannabis Taxes
Packet Pg. 552
19 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Cannabis Tax thru November is $714,235 compared to a projection of $807,830 or 11.6% below projection. It is important to note that this only includes one quarter of the increased tax revenue.

Other Taxes thru November received is $708,483 compared to a projection of $1,145,835 or 38.17% below projection.

This is largely due to one of the Franchise fees that is not paid until the last quarter being spread evenly. This revenue still has some slight downward trends presented in the data thru November but some will be cleared up by fiscal year end.

Scenario 1 (Higher) -
This scenario shows the adopted budget amounts for FY 2026 and thereafter.

Scenario 2 (Middle) –
This scenario provides a more modest growth from FY 2025 to FY 2026. This would try to account for some of the downward trends present in Other Taxes, while acknowledging there is some growth potential present in Cannabis Taxes due to the increases in rates adopted by Council in March of 2025.

Scenario 3 (Lower) –
This scenario presented a downside where in FY 2026 there is no upside realized from the changes approved by Council, where Cannabis and Other Taxes come in at the same level of FY 2025.

Fiscal Year Adopted Scenario 1 % Increase YoY $ Change % Change Budget FY 2025 $ 4,104 $ 4,104 $ -
FY 2026 $ 4,689 $ 4,689 14.25% $ - 0.00%
FY 2027 $ 4,766 $ 4,766 1.64% $ - 0.00%
FY 2028 $ 4,957 $ 4,957 4.00% $ - 0.00%
FY 2029 $ 5,155 $ 5,155 4.00% $ - 0.00%
FY 2030 $ 5,361 $ 5,361 4.00% $ - 0.00%
FY 2031 $ 5,576 $ 5,576 4.00% $ - 0.00%
Fiscal Year Adopted Scenario 2 % Increase YoY $ Change % Change Budget FY 2025 $ 4,104 $ 4,104 $ -
FY 2026 $ 4,689 $ 4,254 3.66% (435) $ -9.27%
FY 2027 $ 4,766 $ 4,425 4.00% (341) $ -7.16%
FY 2028 $ 4,957 $ 4,602 4.00% (355) $ -7.16%
FY 2029 $ 5,155 $ 4,786 4.00% (369) $ -7.16%
FY 2030 $ 5,361 $ 4,977 4.00% (384) $ -7.16%
FY 2031 $ 5,576 $ 5,176 4.00% (399) $ -7.16%
Fiscal Year Adopted Scenario 3 % Increase YoY $ Change % Change Budget FY 2025 $ 4,104 $ 4,104 $ -
FY 2026 $ 4,689 $ 4,104 0.00% (585) $ -12.48%
FY 2027 $ 4,766 $ 4,268 4.00% (498) $ -10.45%
FY 2028 $ 4,957 $ 4,439 4.00% (518) $ -10.45%
FY 2029 $ 5,155 $ 4,616 4.00% (538) $ -10.45%
FY 2030 $ 5,361 $ 4,801 4.00% (560) $ -10.45%
FY 2031 $ 5,576 $ 4,993 4.00% (582) $ -10.45%
Packet Pg. 553
20 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Additional Information –
Below is a table of a standard 5% up & down from Scenario 1. This gives Council a sense of the impact but this is importantly not compounded it is 5% measured by each year individually. As noted earlier this revenue is not as volatile and has a more predictable range of outcomes.

The value of a 1% miss in any given individual year is approximately $41K. As illustrated in the chart 5% is $205,000 in the early years and $279,000 by year 6. This is an important reminder to Council that inherently the risk of missing the Cannabis & other tax projection. Doing so by only 5%, which means the forecast would be 95% accurate could result in an additional or less revenue by $205,000.

Fiscal Year 5% Down Baseline 5% Up
FY 2025 3,899 $ 4,104 4,309
FY 2026 4,455 $ 4,689 4,923
FY 2027 4,528 $ 4,766 5,004
FY 2028 4,709 $ 4,957 5,204
FY 2029 4,897 $ 5,155 5,413
FY 2030 5,093 $ 5,361 5,629
FY 2031 5,297 $ 5,576 5,854
Packet Pg. 554
21 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27)

Background & Information
The internal departments and transfers revenue includes a variety of different revenue sources. This includes:
• Cost Allocation Plan revenues
• National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) allocation revenues • Public Works Administration allocation revenues
• Payment In-Lieu of Taxes (PILOT) revenue
• Gas tax transfers
• Utility road impact transfers
• Transfer from Airport for partial Fire support reimbursement • Transfer for dedicated public safety funds
• Transfers out for Rolling Stock and equipment replacement • Transfer out for Library
• Transfer out for Visit Redding and Convention Center
• Transfer out for Parking
• Repayment of advances.

The amounts outlined in this dashboard are denoted in thousands.

Cost Allocation Plan
The cost allocation plan revenue is a revenue that is received in the general fund for services provided across the entire City operations for the general government operations which are housed within the General Fund.

The way the allocation process works is dependent by department and is similar to an internal service fund allocation, however, the charges that would impact the General Fund are not charged as to not create a circular cash movement within the General Fund. General Government is composed of City Manger, City Clerk, City Attorney, Finance, City Treasurer, Purchasing, and Personnel. Each of these departments has different measurements utilized to derive the cost allocation breakdown. Please see the individual department dashboard for more specifics on methodology and amounts measured. The cost allocation plan looks back in order to set the future allocation amounts for both expenditure level and allocation methodology. This revenue is derived through a complex detailed calculation done by the Financial Services Department. Below is a breakdown of the Cost Allocation Plan Revenues.

Internal Departments &
Transfers Revenue
Packet Pg. 555
22 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Actual Revenues:

Budgeted Revenues:

National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Allocation The NPDES revenue is collected to reimburse the Public Works’ Engineering Division for the impacts of the required monitoring across a variety of City departments. This is a permit and monitoring program that was created by the Clean Water Act to regulate pollutants into U.S. waters. The engineering department obtains the permits and performs the monitoring in a centralized place for all of thea ctivities that require the functionality.

This reimburses the Engineering department within the General Fund for the budgeted expenses.

Actual Revenues:

Budgeted Revenues:

Public Works Administration Allocation Revenues
The Public Works’ Engineering Division recieves revenue from the Enterprise Funds (Water, Waste Water, Solid Waste, Storm Drain, ET/USA) within Public Works as a whole and the Public Works – Streets and Fleet Departments. In general, the Public Works Administration allocation is intended to simplify management’s direct charges to the Enterprise Funds within Public Works that are overseen by the Director of Public Works/City Engineer.

Fiscal Year Actual
FY 2021 3,716
FY 2022 3,649
FY 2023 3,758
FY 2024 4,037
FY 2025 4,152
Fiscal Year Budget
FY 2026 4,463
FY 2027 4,597
Fiscal Year Actual
FY 2021 405
FY 2022 450
FY 2023 466
FY 2024 517
FY 2025 543
Fiscal Year Budget
FY 2026 592
FY 2027 612
Packet Pg. 556
23 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Actual Revenues:

Budgeted Revenues:

Payment In-Lieu of Taxes (PILOT)
The General Fund receives a PILOT payment from the Electric Utility Department. This revenue has been calculated by Finance for many years following effectively the same methodology updating for the assets held.

This methodology aligns closely with the calculation of property taxes.

Actual Revenues:

Budgeted Revenues:

Gas Tax Transfers
The City of Redding receives multiple sources of gas taxes that are held in two different funds until they are expended and then transferred to the General Fund. The General Fund incurs all expenses for Streets Maintenance and Capital and then is reimbursed to the allowable amount from the Gas Taxes as appropriate through and internal transfer. The budgeted transfer is based on the budgeted expenses. This offsets the allowable costs that are budgeted within the department. The actual revenues will vary based on completion of the projects and actual expenditures incurred. Carryovers will increase gas tax transfers after the budget has been adopted to the amount of carryovers and ultimately the amount incurred as actual expenses.

Fiscal Year Actual
FY 2021 766
FY 2022 891
FY 2023 833
FY 2024 1,009
FY 2025 904
Fiscal Year Budget
FY 2026 756
FY 2027 794
Fiscal Year Actual
FY 2021 6,098
FY 2022 5,464
FY 2023 6,247
FY 2024 7,271
FY 2025 6,614
Fiscal Year Budget
FY 2026 5,997
FY 2027 6,894
Packet Pg. 557
24 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Actual Revenues:

Budgeted Revenues:

Utility Road Impact Transfers
The Water, Waste Water, and Solid Waste funds reimburse the General Gund for the impacts on the roadway facilities of the vehicles used by the different departments. These have been in place since the early 2000’s and are updated during the development of every budget to reflect increases to costs realized.

Actual Revenues:

Budgeted Revenues:

Airport Transfer
The Airport Fund transfers money to the General Fund to offset the cost of the Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF). The General Fund employees three captains to serve as constant coverage for Redding Regional Airport to staff the ARFF capabilities for the Airport. This requires special training and equipment to perform the operations. The Airport transfer is analyzed during every budget to determine the amount that can be covered by the Airport Fund. The total cost of the captains incurred by the General Fund is approximately $864,400 Actual Revenues:

Fiscal Year Actual
FY 2021 4,635
FY 2022 8,281
FY 2023 9,689
FY 2024 9,737
FY 2025 8,028
Fiscal Year Budget
FY 2026 10,086
FY 2027 10,151
Fiscal Year Actual
FY 2021 1,199
FY 2022 1,282
FY 2023 1,303
FY 2024 1,414
FY 2025 1,462
Fiscal Year Budget
FY 2026 1,510
FY 2027 1,560
Packet Pg. 558
25 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Budgeted Revenues:

Dedicated Public Safety Tax
The City receives annually $272,520 from the County for the dedicated public safety tax that is paid to the County as part of the Sales Tax. This was approved in 1993 and the City has received the same amount since its inception. This money is received in a Special Revenue Fund and then transferred to the General Fund to cover the amount received within the General Fund Police and Fire expenses.

Actual Revenues:

Budgeted Revenues:

Rolling Stock & Equipment Replacement Transfers Out
The City maintains a rolling stock and equipment replacement fund to help save money to mitigate the long term planning for major vehicle and equipment purchases. The money is budgeted as a transfer out of the General Fund based on a Rolling Stock or Equipment Replacement plan. Then Council Policy 416 and 422 allow for the administrative use of these funds at the time when purchases are necessary. When the funds are used there will be an appropriation transfer done to recognize a transfer in from the Rolling Stock or Equipment Replacement fund as appropriate and allow for the budget authority to purchase the item.

Fiscal Year Actual
FY 2021 225
FY 2022 235
FY 2023 245
FY 2024 250
FY 2025 250
Fiscal Year Budget
FY 2026 250
FY 2027 250
Fiscal Year Actual
FY 2021 273
FY 2022 273
FY 2023 273
FY 2024 273
FY 2025 273
Fiscal Year Budget
FY 2026 273
FY 2027 273
Packet Pg. 559
26 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Actual Rolling Stock Revenues:

Budget Rolling Stock Revenues:

Actual Equipment Replacement Revenues:

Budget Equipment Replacement Revenues:

Library Transfers Out
The City entered into a joint agreement for funding for the Redding Library. As part of that agreement the City acts as the fiduciary for the accounting and administrative work for the Redding, Burney, and Anderson Library.

The Library Transfer Out is per the funding terms of the agreement with Shasta County for the Redding Library.

Actual Library Transfers Out:

Fiscal Year Police Fire Streets Parks Recreation Dev Svcs FY 2021 (450) (193) (34) (20) (1) (4)
FY 2022 (686) (700) (210) (20) (1) (16)
FY 2023 (500) (750) (250) (10) (1) (16)
FY 2024 (225) (225) (250) (250) (5) (50)
FY 2025 (300) (350) (250) (100) (5) (25)
Fiscal Year Police Fire Streets Parks Recreation Dev Svcs FY 2026 (200) (200) (425) (55) (5)
FY 2027 (200) (200) (425) (55) (5)
Fiscal Year Police Fire Parks Recreation
FY 2021 (22) (81) (15)
FY 2022 (22) (305) (10)
FY 2023 (22) (85) (5)
FY 2024 (147) (235) (100) (10)
FY 2025 (50) (235) (100) (10)
Fiscal Year Police Fire Parks Recreation
FY 2026 (50) (150) (55) (3)
FY 2027 (50) (150) (55) (3)
Fiscal Year Actual
FY 2021 (893)
FY 2022 (937)
FY 2023 (965)
FY 2024 (994)
FY 2025 (1,024)
Packet Pg. 560
27 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Budget Library Transfers Out:

Convention Center & Visit Redding Transfers Out
The City has routinely paid the Visit Redding contract from the Convention Center fund since it moved to a contract as opposed to City operations. This is because prior to this this fund is where the employees worked who did this work. The General Fund provides a transfer for the contract with Visit Redding and any Convention Center expenses that cannot be covered by the rents received from Advance Redding.

Actual Convention Center & Visit Redding Transfer Out:

Budgeted Convention Center & Visit Redding Transfer Out:

Parking Transfer Out
The City General Fund could have to cover any shortfalls for the Parking fund. This means that if expenses exceed revenues and there is no available cash balance at the end of the year there must be money transferred from the General Fund to cover the shortfall. From 2020 to 2025 there were no transfers necessary due to available cash. The budgeted transfer for Parking is $38,310.

Repayment of Advances
The City General Fund has two outstanding internal loans with Redding Electric Utility (REU). The first is the repayment of the Soccer Park Turf Loan. This loan was set to begin being repaid when Shasta Regional Soccer Association (SRSA) began making their monthly rent payments to the City. Those funds are now being received and have been repaid since FY 2024. The other loan is the radio loan from REU to Police. This loan has had one payment made and during the January 23, 2025 budget workshop it was decided to postpone loan repayments until FY 2028. The General Fund 10-Year Plan currently accounts for the repayments to begin in FY 2028.

Fiscal Year Budget
FY 2026 (1,055)
FY 2027 (1,086)
Fiscal Year Actual
FY 2021 (818)
FY 2022 (918)
FY 2023 (1,380)
FY 2024 (1,038)
FY 2025 (925)
Fiscal Year Budget
FY 2026 (750)
FY 2027 (756)
Packet Pg. 561
28 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Actual Repayments of Advances:

Budgeted Repayments of Advances:

Fiscal Year Actual FY 2021
FY 2022
FY 2023
FY 2024 (533)
FY 2025 (72)
Fiscal Year Budget
FY 2026 (72)
FY 2027 (72)
Packet Pg. 562
29 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27)

Background & Information
This dashboard presents Police and Fire revenues as a combined Public Safety category, while maintaining separation from other General Fund revenue sources. Public Safety revenues are derived from a variety of departmental activities, including fines and fees, permits, reimbursements, and miscellaneous sources. The categories outlined below provide additional detail on the primary sources and characteristics of Police and Fire revenues reflected in the dashboard.

Fines & Fees
Fines & Fees revenues are generated primarily from the Police department and include revenues related to fingerprinting fees, massage parlor fees, cardroom fees, pawn fees, concealed weapon fees, report fees, inspection fees, repossession release fees and proof of correction fees. Fines that can be assessed for the following: towing cost recovery, red light camera violations, vehicle code violtions, traffic violations and VCF violations. Red Light Camera fines directly fund the cost of one Officer that is dedicated to the program. The Fire department collects plan check fees, permit fees and inspection fees.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for safety fines & fees over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases. Budget for this category is lower than actuals particulary due to not budgeting for the Red Light Camera program at the time of budget. Other fines and fees in the fire department are also not budgeted at the time of budget.

Contributions & Reimbursements
Contributions & Reimbursements – Police and Fire have various contributions and reimbursements primarily including school contributions for School Resource Officers and DUI reimbursements.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 2,700,914.59
FY 2022 2,813,917.44 4.02%
FY 2023 1,775,994.00 -58.44%
FY 2024 1,209,848.00 -46.79%
FY 2025 1,456,386.06 16.93%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 738,600.00
FY 2026 758,520.00 2.63%
FY 2027 770,740.00 1.59%
Public Safety Revenue
Packet Pg. 563
30 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27)

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for all safety contribution/reimbursement revenue over the last 5 years. The increase from FY 2023 through FY 2025 is due to the reimbursement of Fire overtime from state agencies. This revenue is not budgeted, therefore budgeted revenue appears lower than acutal for this cateogry.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases. Budget increase between 2025 and 2026 is related to School Contribution revenue not being budgeted in 2025. This revenue is budgeted in 2026.

Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous Safety revenues include sale of property, loss & property damage, and miscellaneous revenue.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for miscellaneous safety revenue over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases. The budget below represents budget only for miscellaneous revenue, which presented a drop in actuals in previous years. The table above includes actuals from sale of property, loss & property damage, and sale of rolling stock – which are not budgeted revenues.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 672,091.96
FY 2022 863,062.24 28.41%
FY 2023 638,690.00 -26.00%
FY 2024 1,762,043.00 175.88%
FY 2025 3,600,405.03 104.33%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 410,530.00
FY 2026 1,327,760.00 223.43%
FY 2027 1,350,150.00 1.69%
Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 309,227.58
FY 2022 376,985.46 17.97%
FY 2023 442,836.00 14.87%
FY 2024 244,485.00 -81.13%
FY 2025 253,330.23 3.49%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 150,000.00
FY 2026 133,500.00 -12.36%
FY 2027 133,500.00 0.00%
Packet Pg. 564
31 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Bad Debt
Bad Debt – Some revenues are uncollectible and therefore written off as bad debt.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for safety bad-debt over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases.

Grant
Shown below is Safety related grants over the last five years. General Fund Grants are now recorded in a separate fund and not in the General Fund. The tables below represent the SAFER grant, which originated in the General fund, and therefore has been kept there since its inception. in the General Fund due to…. All other General Fund grants, are recored in the General Fund Grants Fund.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for safety bad-debt over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 (13,761.79)
FY 2022 (119,551.25) 88.49%
FY 2023 (99,480.00) -20.18%
FY 2024 (38,899.00) -155.74%
FY 2025 (99,629.43) 60.96%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 (55,000.00)
FY 2026 (55,000.00) 0.00%
FY 2027 (55,000.00) 0.00%
Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 -
FY 2022 51,800.00 #DIV/0!
FY 2023 5,687,998.00 10880.69%
FY 2024 341,395.00 -94.00%
FY 2025 6,684.00 -98.04%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025
FY 2026 2,066,720.00 #DIV/0!
FY 2027 860,330.00 -58.37%
Packet Pg. 565
32 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27)

Background & Information
The major revenues generated in the Development Services Department come primarily from permits, fees and fines across the Permit Center, Building, Planning and Code Enforcement Divisions. Development Services revenues, specifically permits, fees, cannabis-related revenues, and code enforcement fines, are directly tied to departmental expenditures. As service levels increase or decrease, departmental revenues are impacted accordingly.

Net Development Services Budgeted Subsidy with General Fund – Fiscal Year 2026 - $1,335,203 This is the amount of costs that are budgeted that are not being recovered through fee revenues. Not all this cost can be recovered because the Planning Division and Code Enforcement Division routinely do work for general government purposes that cannot be charged to a customer. This is explained in more detail in those division’s dashboards. Staff estimates that $200,000-$300,000 is not recoverable, meaning the maximum level of savings to the General Fund would likely be around $1,000,000. This level of savings to the General Fund could occur through decreases in expenses and/or increasing revenues through cost recovery. This amount has been analyzed with all four Development Services divisions combined due to the nature of revenues and expenditures recorded across divisions.

Permit Revenue
Permit revenue across all Development Services Divisions comprises fees generated from building, electrical, plumbing, mechanical, transportation, engineering encroachment, and planning permits, in addition to plan check fees.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for all permit revenue over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases. The increase from FY 2025 to 2026 is equivalent to a 10% increase in building permit fee structure based on Council direction at the March 13th budget workshop. Additional increase to this revenue catetory is $100,000 for Engingeering Encroachment Permits, which was budgeted at $0 in FY 2025.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 2,987,896.55
FY 2022 2,875,623.78 -3.90%
FY 2023 3,059,281.00 6.00%
FY 2024 2,639,734.00 -15.89%
FY 2025 3,126,189.89 15.56%
Development Services Revenue
Packet Pg. 566
33 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Fee Revenue
Fee revenue is received within both the Building and Planning Divisions. In the Building Division, fee revenue is derived from building plan-recording services. In the Planning Division, fee revenue is generated from land use and zoning activities, as well as short-term rental planning services.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for all cee revenue over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases. The increase from FY 2025 to 2026 is equivalent to a 10% increase in planning fee structure based on Council direction at the March 13th budget workshop. The revenues impacted by this 10% increase include Land Use & Zoning Fees and Building Plan Recording Fees. Additional revenue in this category includes Short Term Rental Planning fees, which was not increased in FY 2026 but rather decreased $100,000 from FY 2025 due to historical trends.

Cannabis Permit Fees
Cannabis permit revenue is recorded in the Code Enforcement Division and generated from the issuance of permits related to commercial and residential cannabis permits.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for all cannabis permit revenue over the last 5 years.

Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 3,022,850.00
FY 2026 3,425,130.00 11.74%
FY 2027 3,591,380.00 4.63%
Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 382,901.63
FY 2022 552,068.11 30.64%
FY 2023 625,538.00 11.75%
FY 2024 475,157.00 -31.65%
FY 2025 501,433.00 5.24%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 511,010.00
FY 2026 417,110.00 -22.51%
FY 2027 437,970.00 4.76%
Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 495,057.30
FY 2022 545,863.50 9.31%
FY 2023 770,570.00 29.16%
FY 2024 819,558.00 5.98%
FY 2025 859,250.50 4.62%
Packet Pg. 567
34 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases. Cannabis Permit revenue was increased to $800,000 based on prior year actuals as this revenue has surpassed $700,000 since FY 2023. Revenue was budgeted lower than FY 2025 to be conservative.

Code Enforcement Fines
Code Enforcement Fine revenue is recorded in the Code Enforcement Division and is generated from fines related to enforcement of Code violations across the city. Additionally, code enforcement fine revenue includes fines specifically related to cannabis code violations. Included in this category is bad-debt write offs, which reduce revenue if the fine is uncollectible.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for all code enforcement fine revenue over the last 5 years.

Budgeted amounts are listed below:

The FY 2026 Budget was set by analyzing the code enforcement fine revenue net of uncollectible and uncollected fines.

Miscellaneous/Other
Miscellaneous/other revenue includes sale of property, rolling stock or publications & maps. Additionally, this category includes a technology surcharge. Grant revenue is also included in here, which corresponds to a spike in historical revenue in FY 2024 and 2025, with no grant revenue budgeted in 2026 or 2027.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for all miscellaneous/other revenue over the last 5 years.

Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 458,600.00
FY 2026 800,000.00 42.68%
FY 2027 800,000.00 0.00%
Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 180,802.48
FY 2022 197,998.27 9.51%
FY 2023 407,150.00 105.63%
FY 2024 382,314.00 -6.10%
FY 2025 182,121.30 -52.36%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 124,000.00
FY 2026 145,600.00 17.42%
FY 2027 153,630.00 5.52%
Packet Pg. 568
35 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27)

The table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-overyear percentage increases.

Subdivisions – Planning Permits
Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for all miscellaneous/other revenue over the last 5 years.

The table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-overyear percentage increases.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 238,179.84
FY 2022 284,256.64 16.21%
FY 2023 283,331.00 -0.33%
FY 2024 796,823.00 64.44%
FY 2025 679,265.10 -17.31%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 216,760.00
FY 2026 275,360.00 21.28%
FY 2027 287,280.00 4.15%
Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 102,714.02
FY 2022 36,671.40 -64.30%
FY 2023 - -100.00%
FY 2024 (7,724.00) #DIV/0!
FY 2025 16,679.40 -315.94%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025
FY 2026 100,000.00 #DIV/0!
FY 2027 100,000.00 0.00%
Packet Pg. 569
36 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27)

Background & Information
The major revenues generated in the Community Service Department come from the Aquatic Center, Recreation Programs and the Redding Sports Park. Community Services revenues, specifically Aquatic Center revenues and Recreation fees, are directly tied to departmental expenditures. As service levels increase or decrease, departmental revenues are impacted accordingly.

Aquatic Center
Aquatic Center revenues include swim, admissions, concessions/sales and other miscellaneous revenues. Swim revenues are generated from fees related to swim lessons, swim teams, swim meets and lane rentals. Admission fees are for admission to the Aquatic Center. The cost of admission is between $5.00 and $7.00 based on age and weekday (Sun-Th) or weekend (F-S) admission. Concession/Sales revenues include merchandise and food concessions within the Aquatic Center. Miscellaneous revenues include other programs offered and aquatic facility rentals
Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for all Aquatic Center revenues over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases. FY 2025 budget shows Aquatic Center and Recreation combined as they were one department prior to FY 2026 budget cycle.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 161,321.72
FY 2022 194,168.14 16.92%
FY 2023 292,395.00 33.59%
FY 2024 306,604.00 4.63%
FY 2025 326,674.64 6.14%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 1,080,520.00
FY 2026 336,690.00 -220.92%
FY 2027 348,520.00 3.39%
Community Services Revenue
Packet Pg. 570
37 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) The Aquatic Center subsidy from the General Fund is shown below for FY2025 actuals, and FY 2026 and 2027 budget. This is the amount of costs that are not being recovered through fee revenues.

Actual
Budget

Recreation Programs

Recreation Program revenues include fees collected for youth programs, adult programs, other programs, and facility rentals. Youth program revenues include fees for youth and teen sports, day camps and after school care camps. These fees are imposed by Council Policy 806, which states that any youth class or program fee is set to target a 90% recovery of the direct costs associated with the program. Adult program revenues include fees for adult sports and fitness classes. Council Policy 806 states that adult fees are set to target a 105% recovery of the direct costs associated with the program. Direct costs are defined as materials, supplies, and part-time personnel costs required to conduct the specific class or program. Administration personnel, overhead costs and facilities are not included. Other program revenues include community event revenue, bridge lighting fee and Halloween event. The Recreation Division also receives revenue related to the rental of community facilities and parks, such as, Caldwell Recreation Center and Enterprise Park.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for all recreation program revenues over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases. FY 2025 budget shows Aquatic Center and Recreation combined as they were one department prior to FY 2026 budget cycle.

Fiscal Year Revenue Expense Subsidy
FY 2025 326,674.64 389,425.23 62,750.59
Fiscal Year Revenue Expense Subsidy
FY 2026 336,690.00 603,580.00 266,890.00
FY 2027 348,520.00 603,590.00 255,070.00
Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 273,998.87
FY 2022 477,515.58 42.62%
FY 2023 595,381.00 19.80%
FY 2024 701,029.00 15.07%
FY 2025 947,076.78 25.98%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 1,080,520.00
FY 2026 781,700.00 -38.23%
FY 2027 780,710.00 -0.13%
Packet Pg. 571
38 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) The Recreation subsidy from the General Fund is shown below for FY2025 actuals, and FY 2026 and 2027 budget. This is the amount of costs that are not being recovered through fee revenues.

Actual
Budget
Redding Sports Park
Redding Sports Park generated revenues include Park Use Fees and Gate Entry Fees. Staff is currently working to open the restaurant and snack bar at the Redding Sports Park, which generate additional revenue.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for Sports Park revenues over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases. Sports park revenues equal expenses and therefore there is no general fund subsidy of this deparment.

The Redding Sports Park subsidy from the General Fund is shown below for FY2025 actuals, and FY 2026 and 2027 budget. This is the amount of costs that are not being recovered through fee revenues.

Actual
Budget
Fiscal Year Revenue Expense Subsidy
FY 2025 944,237.88 2,393,303.15 1,449,065.27
Fiscal Year Revenue Expense Subsidy
FY 2026 781,700.00 2,230,560.00 1,448,860.00
FY 2027 780,710.00 2,377,480.00 1,596,770.00
Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 -
FY 2022 -
FY 2023 -
FY 2024 -
FY 2025 473,618.98 100.00%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 -
FY 2026 871,680.00 100.00%
FY 2027 888,980.00 1.95%
Fiscal Year Revenue Expense Subsidy
FY 2025 473,368.98 348,592.71 (124,776.27)
Fiscal Year Revenue Expense Subsidy
FY 2026 871,680.00 871,680.00 -
FY 2027 888,980.00 888,980.00 -
Packet Pg. 572
39 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Parks – Lease/Rentals
The Parks Division receives some revenue from leases of City property for use, specifically for placement of cell towers and for the California Soccer Park. Cell tower revenue is typically used for miscellaneous capital improvements, or unforeseen maintenance and repairs within the Parks Division.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for Parks lease/rental revenues over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 70,119.39
FY 2022 77,103.02 9.06%
FY 2023 99,144.00 22.23%
FY 2024 155,119.00 36.09%
FY 2025 175,741.11 11.73%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 107,520.00
FY 2026 176,270.00 39.00%
FY 2027 179,260.00 1.67%
Packet Pg. 573
40 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27)

Background & Information
The following revenues summarized below represent General Fund revenue sources that do not fall within the other major revenue dashboards presented: Sales Tax, Property Tax, Other Taxes, Development Services, Community Services, Public Safety and Transfers. These revenues are generated from a variety of activities including investment earnings, fees, leases and rentals and other miscellaneous sources. The following categories provide additional detail below.

Investment Income
Investment income relates to interest earnings generated from investments held by the City. Shown below is only the General Fund and General Fund grants portion of investment income – as the Grants portion is allocated to the General Fund. Investment income is allocated to each fund, relative to their cash balance at the end of each month.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for all investment revenue over the last 5 years.

Investment rate of return over the last 5 years has gone from 0.78% in 2021 to 2.72% in 2025 – with a peak in return during FY 2024.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases.

Lease/Rental Revenue

Lease and rental revenues include leases of the following: Rodeo Grounds, Carter House, Clover Creek, and the City Hall Coffee Kiosk. Rental revenue includes rental of the following: Council Chamber & Community Room, Property Rental, Diestelhorst, United Way building, CVB building and SHASCOM rent.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for all lease/rental revenue across all General Fund departments over the last 5 years. Decrease in revenue from FY 2024 to FY 2025 is attributable to the loss in revenue from SHASCOM and Big League Dreams.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 130,094.44
FY 2022 102,248.78 -27.23%
FY 2023 379,729.00 73.07%
FY 2024 670,514.00 43.37%
FY 2025 294,244.65 -127.88%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 125,210.00
FY 2026 100,000.00 -25.21%
FY 2027 100,000.00 0.00%
Miscellaneous/Other Revenue
Packet Pg. 574
41 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27)

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases. Increase to budget in FY 2026 is attributable to the addition of CalFire rent.

Fees
Miscellaneous fees, that are unrelated to recreation, development services and safety fees include late fees, return check fees, animal shelter fees, copy fees and charter PEG fees.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for all miscellaneous fee revenue across all General Fund departments over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases. FY 2026 revenues were forcasted relative to actuals at the time of budget as well as FY 2025 budget. This minor decrease accounts for a reduction to other fines & fees in the aniaml control division due to prior year actuals of zero revenue. Budgeted revenues are lower than actual revenues from FY 2025, which is attribuable to Charter PEG fees not being budgeted, as well as late fees and return check fees being higher than budgeted.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 354,776.32
FY 2022 361,564.13 1.88%
FY 2023 558,999.00 35.32%
FY 2024 614,872.00 9.09%
FY 2025 400,978.68 -53.34%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 501,080.00
FY 2026 548,400.00 8.63%
FY 2027 549,710.00 0.24%
Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 249,723.69
FY 2022 1,699,185.32 85.30%
FY 2023 1,895,231.00 10.34%
FY 2024 1,909,301.00 0.74%
FY 2025 1,967,207.05 2.94%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 1,756,000.00
FY 2026 1,742,000.00 -0.80%
FY 2027 1,742,000.00 0.00%
Packet Pg. 575
42 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Animal Licenses
Animal License revenue is collected for the issuance of animal licenses by the Haven Humane Society and remitted to the City of Redding.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for animal license revenue across all General Gund departments over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases.

Bad Debt
Bad Debt is related to any revenue that is written off and uncollectible Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for bad-debt across all General Fund departments over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 44,066.75
FY 2022 49,345.25 10.70%
FY 2023 59,261.00 16.73%
FY 2024 56,232.00 -5.39%
FY 2025 49,912.00 -12.66%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 50,000.00
FY 2026 50,000.00 0.00%
FY 2027 50,000.00 0.00%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 (2,825.85)
FY 2026 (31,773.97) 17.42%
FY 2027 (19,145.00) 5.52%
FY 2024 (23,116.00) 20.74%
FY 2025 (30,869.92) 33.54%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 (20,300.00)
FY 2026 (20,300.00) 0.00%
FY 2027 (20,300.00) 0.00%
Packet Pg. 576
43 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27) Public Works – Land Development
Engineering land development revenue is pursuant to the requirements of Redding Municipal Codes (RMC)

16.12.070 & 17.74.050, and the most recent adopted Resolution 2025-048, which establish a fee deposit schedule intended to cover the City’s costs incurred as a result of private land development projects.

Revenue in this division is budgeted to match the expenses associated with completing development projects.

As a result, the division has a net-zero impact on the General Fund. Budgeted revenue totals $630,000 for FY 2026 and $650,000 for FY 2025.

Other
Other Revenues include revenues related to business license reprints, animal citations, franchise revenue, court fines, state mandated programs, miscellaneous revenue, cal-card rebates, contributions and reimbursement for damages.

Actual results and % increase/(decrease) are listed below for other revenue across all General Fund departments over the last 5 years.

The following table presents the annual budget amounts for Fiscal Years 2025 through 2027, along with the year-over-year percentage increases.

Fiscal Year Actual % Increase
FY 2021 661,533.81
FY 2022 692,189.71 4.63%
FY 2023 1,098,618.00 58.72%
FY 2024 1,504,772.00 36.97%
FY 2025 1,008,184.42 -33.00%
Fiscal Year Budget % Increase
FY 2025 639,820.00
FY 2026 705,640.00 10.29%
FY 2027 708,230.00 0.37%
Packet Pg. 577
44 Attachment: ^Revenue Dashboards 1.15.26 (9B--Biennial Budget Revenue Discussion FY 26 & FY 27)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize staff to schedule a Special Meeting on January 26, 2026, at 5:15 p.m. to discuss budget revenue projections; or provide alternate direction to staff.

Fiscal Impact
There is no fiscal impact associated with scheduling a Special Meeting.

Alternative Action
The Council could choose not to schedule the Special Meeting on January 26, 2026, and/or provide alternate direction to staff.

Background/Analysis
During Item 12 at the January 6, 2026, City Council meeting, Council Member Audette requested staff move forward with re-scheduling the budget workshop on revenue projections which was originally scheduled as a Special Meeting for December 18, 2025. Council Member Audette requested a Special Meeting be scheduled as soon as possible within the next two weeks.

Council Member Resner suggested that the meeting be scheduled before the end of the month to allow staff flexibility in scheduling the meeting. Vice Mayor Dhanuka requested the meeting be rescheduled as soon as possible, but encouraged flexibility to accommodate everyone’s calendars. Mayor Littau concluded that staff should check calendars and circle around.

After the January 6, 2026, City Council meeting, several Council members expressed different views on the appropriate pathway forward.

MEETING DATE: January 20, 2026
ITEM NO. 9.1(b)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(b)--Consider scheduling a special meeting of the City Council to discuss City of Redding budget revenue projections.

Kari Kibler, Personnel
Director
Packet Pg. 578
Report to Redding City Council January 16, 2026
Re: 9.1(b)--Confirm Special Meeting to Discuss Revenue Projections Page 2 Staff has identified January 26, 2026, as a date which meets the criteria specified in the Item 12 discussion for a Special Meeting to discuss and potentially modify revenue projections for the City’s current biennial budget and is seeking confirmation from the Council to move forward with scheduling the Special Meeting on January 26 and/or alternate direction from Council on the preferred path forward.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
Packet Pg. 579

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Adopt Resolution establishing the City of Redding Audit Committee to provide structured oversight of internal and external audit activities; and (2) Adopt Resolution establishing a City of Redding Financial Advisory Committee to provide community-informed advisory input on budget development, financial priorities, and long-term sustainability.

Fiscal Impact
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with adoption of the attached resolutions. Committee members serve without compensation and meetings will be supported by existing staff resources within the City Manager’s Office and Finance Department.

Alternative Action
Council could provide alternative direction relative to the resolutions and approval of the two committees.

Background/Analysis
On December 2, 2025, the City Council considered Item 9.1(e), which focused on strengthening the City’s financial governance framework, improving transparency, and enhancing long-term fiscal planning and accountability. During that discussion, Council expressed interest in more formalized structures to support:
• Proactive financial oversight;
• Independent review of audit activities and findings; and • Increased community engagement and perspective in budget and financial policy discussions.

MEETING DATE: January 20, 2026
ITEM NO. 9.1(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(c)--Consider Resolutions for establishment of an Audit Committee and Financial Oversight Committee for the City of Redding.

Kari Kibler, Personnel
Director
Packet Pg. 580
Report to Redding City Council January 16, 2026
Re: 9.1(c)--Adopt Resolutions Re: Audit Committee & Financial Oversight Committee Page 2 Item 9.1(e) highlighted the increasing complexity of municipal finance, the importance of aligning financial decisions with long-term sustainability, and the value of structured advisory bodies to assist the City Council in meeting its fiduciary responsibilities. Council direction at that time emphasized the need for clearly defined roles, strong governance practices, and advisory committees that complement, rather than duplicate, existing staff and Council responsibilities.

In response, staff has prepared two companion resolutions for Council consideration: one establishing an Audit Committee and one establishing a Financial Advisory Committee.

Together, these committees are intended to strengthen the City’s overall financial governance framework.

Audit Committee Resolution
The City has maintained an Audit Committee since 2015 as a Brown Act committee; prior to 2015, the committee did not operate under Brown Act requirements. Currently, the Audit Committee meets at least annually to review and discuss the results of the City’s annual external audit. In addition, Council Policy 425 delegates responsibility for internal audits to the City’s Finance Department and requires that the results of those audits be presented to the Audit Committee.

The proposed Audit Committee resolution formalizes a focused, Council led advisory body dedicated to audit and accountability functions. It provides a mechanism to initiate and review internal audits with a dedicated reporting mechanism. Key elements include:
• Clear Authority and Role: The Audit Committee serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council, providing structured oversight of internal audit activities, external audit services, and audit findings, without directing staff or assuming operational authority.
• Council Leadership with Limited Membership: The Committee is composed of the Mayor and Vice Mayor as voting members, ensuring direct Council involvement and accountability. The resolution also allows for the optional inclusion of up to two nonvoting community members to provide additional expertise and continuity. • Continuity and Expertise: Staggered appointments and defined qualification criteria for community members are designed to preserve institutional knowledge and bring relevant audit, financial, or governance experience to the Committee’s work. • Regular, Transparent Meetings: Publicly noticed and open to public comment, provide a predictable forum for reviewing internal audit priorities and findings, external audit findings and performance, external audit contract considerations, and opportunities for process improvement.
• Alignment with Best Practices: The Audit Committee structure reflects best practices in municipal governance by separating audit oversight from operational management while enhancing transparency and accountability.

Packet Pg. 581
Report to Redding City Council January 16, 2026
Re: 9.1(c)--Adopt Resolutions Re: Audit Committee & Financial Oversight Committee Page 3 The Audit Committee resolution reflects the existing audit committee requirements and discussion council had under item 9.1(e) on December 2, 2025, by formalizing audit oversight regarding internal and external audit processes.

Financial Advisory Committee
The proposed Financial Advisory Committee (FAC) resolution establishes a broader, community-facing advisory body focused on fiscal policy, budget priorities, and economic trends. Key elements include:
• Advisory Role to Council: The FAC provides non-binding recommendations and perspectives to the City Council on budget development, financial priorities, and long-term sustainability, without decision-making authority or staff direction. • Balanced Composition: The Committee includes two Council Members appointed through the Mayor’s committee assignment process and five community members appointed by Council vote. This structure balances elected-official oversight with diverse community and industry perspectives.
• Industry-Based Expertise and Community Insight: Community member criteria emphasize representation from major employers, local industries, and professions that understand spending patterns, economic conditions, and the social and emotional pulse of the community. Restrictions on conflicts of interest and Council relationships preserve independence and credibility.
• Term Alignment and Continuity: Four-year staggered terms aligned with Council Member terms ensure continuity while maintaining accountability and periodic renewal of membership.
• Flexible, Budget-Aligned Meeting Cadence: The FAC is designed to meet strategically, often a limited number of times, to review materials staff intends to present to the Council, evaluate priorities, and provide feedback during budget development. Meeting frequency may increase during biennial budget cycles, with the FAC authorized to recommend cadence adjustments annually. • Sunset and Evaluation: A two-year sunset review requires the Council to evaluate the FAC’s effectiveness using data and outcomes, ensuring the FAC remains purposeful and aligned with Council priorities.

The FAC directly supports the objectives discussed in Item 9.1(e) by adding structured, community-informed financial insight while maintaining clear boundaries between advisory input, staff analysis, and Council decision-making.

Environmental Review
This is not a project defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Packet Pg. 582
Report to Redding City Council January 16, 2026
Re: 9.1(c)--Adopt Resolutions Re: Audit Committee & Financial Oversight Committee Page 4 Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Budget and Financial Management – “Achieve balanced and stable 10-year Financial Plans for all funds.”
• Communication and Transparency – “Improve the quality of communication with the public and City employees to enhance knowledge and increase transparency to improve public trust.”
• Government of the 21st Century – “Be relevant and proactive to the opportunities and challenges of today’s residents and workforce. Anticipate the future to make better decisions today.”
Attachments
^Draft Resolution - Audit Committee Information
^Draft Resolution - Financial Oversight Committee Information Packet Pg. 583
RESOLUTION NO. 2026- ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING CITY COUNCIL

ESTABLISHING AN AUDIT COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to strengthen financial oversight, transparency, accountability, and risk management through the establishment of an Audit Committee; and WHEREAS, an Audit Committee provides a forum to review internal and external audit activities, recommend improvements, and ensure appropriate follow-up on findings; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that an Audit Committee is hereby established with the following authority, purpose, composition, and operating provisions:

1. Authority
The Audit Committee is established by and derives its authority from the City Council. The Committee serves in an advisory capacity to the City Council and has no independent decision-making authority unless expressly delegated by Council action. The Committee may request information, presentations, and reports from City management, internal audit staff, and external auditors as necessary to fulfill its responsibilities.

2. Purpose
The purpose of the Audit Committee is to:
• Enhance the integrity, transparency, and effectiveness of the City’s financial reporting, internal controls, and audit processes;
• Provide direction and guidance regarding internal audit function topic considerations, review findings, and when necessary review and discuss process improvements; • Review external audit service contracts, including scope, vendor selection, performance, and results;
• Facilitate communication among the City Council, management, internal auditors, and external auditors; and
• Promote best practices in governance, risk management, and financial accountability.

3. Composition and Membership
A. Voting Members
• The Mayor and Vice Mayor shall serve as voting members of the Audit Committee.

B. Non-Voting Community Members (Optional/Advisory)
• The Committee may include up to two (2) community members who serve in a non-voting, advisory capacity.
• Community members shall be appointed jointly by the Mayor and Vice Mayor.

Packet Pg. 584 Attachment: ^Draft Resolution - Audit Committee Information (9.1(c)--Adopt Resolutions Re: Audit Committee & Financial Oversight • Appointments are intended to provide continuity and institutional knowledge over multiple years.
• Terms should be for two years with the first term appointed by the mayor being for 3 years to provide proper staggering thereafter to ensure every other year a new committee member may be considered.

C. Criteria for Community Members
Community members should, to the extent practicable, possess:
• Experience or education in accounting, auditing, finance, public administration, risk management, or a related field;
• An understanding of governmental or public-sector financial practices; • The ability to analyze complex financial and audit information; • A commitment to ethical standards, objectivity, and the public interest.

4. Terms of Service
• The Mayor and Vice Mayor shall serve on the Committee concurrent with their elected terms or Council designation.
• Community members shall serve terms of two (2) or for the first appointment one of a three (3) years, as determined at appointment, to facilitate staggered terms. • Community members may be reappointed, subject to Mayor and Vice Mayor discretion.

5. Notes and Requirements for Non-Council (Community) Members • Community members serve in an advisory, non-voting capacity only. • Members must comply with applicable ethics laws, conflict-of-interest requirements, and disclosure obligations.
• Members shall not have any financial or business relationship with the City that would impair independence.
• Members may be required to complete ethics, audit, or governance-related training as determined by the City.

6. Staff Participation
• The City Manager and Director of Finance, or their designees, shall attend Committee meetings and ensure staff availability to support Committee work. • Staff participation is necessary to provide information regarding audit results and financial information; staff shall not be directed by the Committee.

7. Meeting Schedule and Cadence
• The Audit Committee shall annually adopt a meeting schedule. • Meetings shall be publicly noticed, open to the public, and provide opportunity for public comment in accordance with applicable open meeting laws.

Packet Pg. 585 Attachment: ^Draft Resolution - Audit Committee Information (9.1(c)--Adopt Resolutions Re: Audit Committee & Financial Oversight Typical Agenda Topics May Include:
• Training and education related to auditing, financial oversight, and governance; • Review of internal audit plans, findings, recommendations, and process improvements; • Evaluation of modifications to internal audit practices or scope; • Review and evaluation of external audit contracts, including auditor selection, performance, feedback, and potential modifications;
• Review of third-party audit reports and external audit findings, including management responses and corrective actions.

8. Reporting
• The Audit Committee shall report its observations, recommendations, and activities to the City Council on a regular basis, or as otherwise requested by the Council. • Recommend to Council acceptance of Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) and external audit results.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 20th day of January, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
____________________________________ ____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: ^Draft Resolution - Audit Committee Information (9.1(c)--Adopt Resolutions Re: Audit Committee & Financial Oversight RESOLUTION NO. 2026- ____

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL ESTABLISHING A FINANCIAL

ADVISORY COMMITTEE
WHEREAS, The City Council desires to enhance fiscal transparency, community engagement, and long-term financial sustainability; and
WHEREAS, a Financial Advisory Committee provides informed, community-based perspectives on economic trends, budget priorities, and financial policy considerations; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council that a Financial Advisory Committee is hereby established with the following authority, purpose, composition, and operating provisions:

1. Authority
The Financial Advisory Committee (FAC) is established by and derives its authority from the City Council. The FAC serves solely in an advisory capacity and shall provide recommendations and observations to the City Council. The FAC shall have no independent decision-making authority and shall not direct City staff. The City Manager and Finance Director shall support the Committee by providing relevant financial information, analysis, and staff presentations.

2. Purpose
The purpose of the Financial Advisory Committee is to:
• Provide advisory input to the City Council on budget development, financial priorities, and long-term fiscal sustainability;
• Review major financial assumptions, economic conditions, and community trends that may impact City revenues and expenditures;
• Offer community-informed perspectives on spending priorities in relation to adopted Council goals and community needs;
• Review staff-prepared materials intended for City Council consideration and provide nonbinding feedback; and • Strengthen transparency and public trust in the City’s financial decision-making process.

3. Composition and Membership
All Members of the FAC shall have voting rights.

A. Council Members
• The Committee shall include two (2) members of the City Council, appointed by the Mayor through the Council committee assignment process.

B. Community Members
• The Committee shall include five (5) community members.

Packet Pg. 587 Attachment: ^Draft Resolution - Financial Oversight Committee Information (9.1(c)--Adopt Resolutions Re: Audit Committee & Financial • Each Council Member shall be encouraged to recommend qualified applicants. • Each Council Member shall provide one recommendation for inclusion on the Committee. • Community members shall be appointed by majority vote of the City Council following an open application and selection process.

C. Member Qualifications and Criteria
Community members should, to the extent practicable, reflect a broad cross-section of the local economy and community perspective. Appointments made by each Council Member should consider the following as potential experience, expertise, and/or background:
• Major employers or key local industries;
• Healthcare, retail, hospitality, construction, insurance, or financial services; • Financial expertise such as CPAs, CFOs, CEOs, or senior financial professionals; and • Roles that provide insight into purchasing behavior, spending trends, and the social and economic pulse of the community.

Community members must:
• Have no conflict of interest or opportunity for monetary gain related to City decisions; • Have no immediate family or household relationship with a sitting Council Member; • Be able to evaluate financial and policy issues objectively and in the public interest.

4. Terms of Service
A. Council Members
• Council Members shall serve on the Committee concurrent with their Council committee assignments or at the pleasure of the Mayor and City Council.

B. Community Members
• Community members shall serve four (4) year terms, staggered to align with Council Member terms for continuity and institutional knowledge. Terms of each appointed member will end one year after the end of the term of each council member. • Community members may be reappointed following expiration of their terms, subject to Council approval.

5. Notes and Requirements for Non-Council (Community) Members • Community members serve without compensation unless otherwise authorized by the City Council.
• Members must comply with all applicable ethics laws, conflict-of-interest requirements, and disclosure obligations.
• Members shall not have financial interests, contractual relationships, or other affiliations that could impair independence.
• Members are expected to attend meetings regularly and review materials in advance.

Packet Pg. 588 Attachment: ^Draft Resolution - Financial Oversight Committee Information (9.1(c)--Adopt Resolutions Re: Audit Committee & Financial

6. Staff Participation
• The City Manager and Finance Director, or their designees, shall attend Committee meetings and ensure staff availability to support Committee work. • Staff participation is intended to facilitate information sharing and discussion; staff shall not be directed by the Committee.

7. Meeting Schedule and Cadence
• The Financial Advisory Committee shall meet as needed, generally a limited number of times during each fiscal cycle.
• Meetings may include review of materials and presentations staff intends to bring forward to the City Council.
• The Committee shall review budget priorities, community conditions, and adopted Council goals to inform advisory recommendations regarding the budget. • Meeting cadence may increase during biennial budget development years, including additional meetings aligned with the budget preparation process.
• Annually, the Committee may recommend changes to its meeting cadence to the City Council for consideration.
• All meetings shall be publicly noticed, open to the public, and include an opportunity for public comment in accordance with applicable open meeting laws.

8. Sunset Clause
• The Financial Advisory Committee shall be reviewed by the City Council after two (2) years of operation.
• The review shall consider data, outcomes, and overall effectiveness in meeting the Committee’s purpose.
• Following review, the City Council may continue, modify, or dissolve the Committee by Council action.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 20th day of January, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
___________________________________
MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVED:
____________________________________ ____________________________________ SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 589 Attachment: ^Draft Resolution - Financial Oversight Committee Information (9.1(c)--Adopt Resolutions Re: Audit Committee & Financial

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the Mayor to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group, Inc., outlining the cooperating framework to support the Ironman 70.3 branded endurance triathlon to take place in the City of Redding on August 16, 2026, August 15, 2027, and August 13, 2028; and
(2) Adopt Resolution approving and adopting the 23rd Amendment to City Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 appropriating $95,000 for Fiscal Year 2025-26 & $128,000 for Fiscal Year 2026-27 to support the Ironman 70.3 event.

Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact of the City of Redding (City) entering into a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with Redding Tourism Marketing Group, Inc. (Choose Redding), is $95,000 for Fiscal Year (FY) 26, $128,000 for FY 27 and FY 28, and $73,000 for FY 29. Further breakdown of cost expenses is broken down below.

FY 26 FY 27 FY 28 FY29
Police $0 $17,000 $17,000 $17,000
Fire $0 $6,000 $6,000 $6,000
Community
Services
$40,000 $20,000 $20,000 $20,000
Public Works $55,000 $55,000 $55,000 $0
Shuttle Services $0 $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
Miscellaneous $0 $5,000 $5,000 $5,000
Total $95,000 $128,000 $128,000 $73,000
MEETING DATE: January 20, 2026
ITEM NO. 9.1(d)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected] [email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.1(d)--Consider Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marking Group, Inc.

Jason Gibilisco, Management
Assistant to the City Manager
Packet Pg. 590
Report to Redding City Council January 16, 2026
Re: 9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group Page 2 The City will be providing necessary measures to provide adequate public safety, trail maintenance and paving, road maintenance and paving, garbage collection, and transporting Ironman participants from the Civic Center to Whiskeytown on race day.

The City of Redding will see increases in Transient occupancy tax (TOT) and sales tax. Choose Redding anticipates the City to see an increase of TOT by $152,000 or more for race week. The total TOT Return for the week of the Ironman 70.3 race will be around $345,000.

TOT returns are based on room rates and it is typical for rates to start increasing the closer it gets to the race date. When rates are higher it means an increase in TOT return. This also makes it difficult to accurately project TOT return. It is expected that all Redding room rentals will be sold out during race weekend.

There will also be an increase in sales tax. Sales tax revenue for the week will not be a significant increase. The event operator World Triathlon Corporation (WTC) operates an Ironman 70.3 sales tent solely for race gear and merchandise, and it is common to sell $1,000,000 worth of merchandise during its operation over race weekend. Estimated sales tax revenue solely from the Ironman 70.3 sales tent is estimated to be $10,000.

Choose Redding has committed financial support to the World Triathlon Corporation for the Ironman 70.3 event for the three-year term beginning at $200,000 the first year, $210,000 the second year, and $220,500 the third year. This does not include other costs that Choose Redding will cover.

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to authorize the MOU and provide staff with alternate direction.

Background/Analysis
In September 2025, Choose Redding hosted a tour for representatives from WTC to gauge if the area surrounding the City would be a good location to host an Ironman 70.3 branded endurance triathlon. On September 18, 2025, Choose Redding contacted the City to announce that WTC chose the Redding area for a three-year term with the first event scheduled for August 2026, with subsequent events in August 2027, and August 2028.

On October 7, 2025, City staff brought forward the Host Venue Agreement from the WTC to the Council. After further review of the Host Venue Agreement with the City Attorney, signing on to be the host, was not in the best interest of the City. There were a number of tasks that fall outside of the City’s purview and jurisdiction. Choose Redding agreed to sign on with the WTC and operate as the host knowing that the City would be partnering with them and covering certain requirements.

The attached MOU splits the services required from the WTC to successfully run the Ironman

70.3 event. The City will be taking on roles such as:

Packet Pg. 591
Report to Redding City Council January 16, 2026
Re: 9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group Page 3

1. Expediating any necessary approvals and permits as required by the City;

2. Command post coordination, law enforcement services, and counterterrorism measures;

3. Coordination of an economic impact study, if necessary;

4. Race course exclusivity in coordinating necessary City street closures;

5. Sending notifications to impacted City residents;

6. Coordination of shuttle services; and

7. Street cleaning and waste management services.

Choose Redding will be operating as the host and agreed to take on a number of roles in the MOU. Some of those roles include providing complimentary hotel rooms; ambulance and medical services; concessions; infrastructure equipment for electricity, lighting, and internet; lavatories; volunteers; and a number of other roles.

The City and Choose Redding has already begun planning for the event. The Ironman 70.3 involves multiple agency coordination and approvals from Shasta County, the California Department of Transportation, California Highway Patrol, National Park Service, Redding Chamber of Commerce and Visit Redding. All groups are generally supportive of the event and working through any know obstacles that have been communicated.

Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Budget Resolution
^Memorandum of Understanding
10-7-25 Staff Report
Packet Pg. 592
RESOLUTION NO. 2026 - ____________
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF REDDING APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE 23rd AMENDMENT TO CITY BUDGET RESOLUTION NO. 2025-049 INCREASING APPROPRIATIONS BY $95,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025-26 AND $128,000 FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FOR IRONMAN 70.3 EVENT SUPPORT

BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDDING THAT Budget Resolution No. 2025-049 be and is hereby amended as follows:

Fiscal Year Ended 2026

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
101 1099 Non-Departmental $95,000 $0
Fiscal Year Ended 2027

FUND DIVISION DESCRIPTION INCREASE DECREASE
101 1099 Non-Departmental $128,000 $0
THAT account titles and numbers requiring adjustments by this Resolution are as follows:

Fiscal Year Ended 2026

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Decrease (Increase) Beginning Balance
101-0000-2910000 Fund Balance $ 95,000
Increase Expenditures
101-1099-5358010 Ironman $ 95,000
Total $ 95,000 $ 95,000
Fiscal Year Ended 2027

USE SOURCE

OF FUNDS OF FUNDS
Increase (Decrease) Beginning Balance
101-0000-2910000 Fund Balance 128,000
Increase Expenditures
101-1099-5358010 Ironman $ 128,000
Total $ 128,000 $ 128,000
Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: ^Budget Resolution (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) THAT the purpose is to increase appropriations by $95,000 for Fiscal Year 2026-27 and by $128,000 for Fiscal Year 2027-28 for Ironman 70.3 event support.

I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redding on the 20th day of January, 2026 and was duly adopted at said meeting by the following vote:

AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:

MIKE LITTAU, Mayor
ATTEST: FORM APPROVAL:

SHARLENE TIPTON, City Clerk CHRISTIAN M. CURTIS, City Attorney Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: ^Budget Resolution (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 595
Attachment: ^Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 596
Attachment: ^Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 597
Attachment: ^Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 598
Attachment: ^Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 599
Attachment: ^Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 600
Attachment: ^Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 601
Attachment: ^Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 602
Attachment: ^Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 603
Attachment: ^Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 604
Attachment: ^Memorandum of Understanding (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group)

CITY OF REDDING

REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL
Recommendation
Authorize and approve the following:
(1) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate a Host Venue Agreement (Agreement) with World Triathlon Corporation to hold an event in the City of Redding in August 2026, August 2027, and August 2028;
(2) Accept the Letter of Commitment of Financial Support for the duration of the Agreement from Choose Redding;
(3) Authorize the City Manager to negotiate a Partnership Agreement with Choose Redding and upon City Attorney approval, execute the Partnership Agreement; and (4) Conditioned upon City Attorney approval, authorize the Mayor to execute the Host Venue Agreement.

Fiscal Impact
The fiscal impact of the City of Redding (City) entering into a Host Venue Agreement (Agreement) with World Triathlon Corporation (WTC) for a three-year term is unknown.

However, pursuant to the agreement, the host city is tasked to provide a number of support services specifically identified in the Agreement’s Exhibit C. We plan to coordinate efforts to complete this additional work with Choose Redding through a Partnership Agreement and other local agencies.

As a number of City departments will be involved with the event, the City’s associated cost to host requires further detailed analysis by staff. A complete event analysis and the projected fiscal impact will be included with the mid-year budget amendments. It should be noted, based on similar events held in other communities, it is projected that the sales tax and transient oriented taxes generated from the event will exceed City staff costs associated with event operations.

MEETING DATE: October 7, 2025
ITEM NO. 9.2(c)
FROM:
***APPROVED BY***
[email protected]
[email protected]
SUBJECT: 9.2(c)--Consider agreement with World Triathlon Corporation to host triathlon events
Steve Bade, Interim City
Manager
Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Report to Redding City Council October 2, 2025
Re: 9.2(c)--Host Venue Agreement with World Triathlon Corporation Page 2 Choose Redding has committed financial support for the three-year term at a minimum of $200,000 annually (see Commitment Letter attached).

Alternative Action
The City Council (Council) could choose not to authorize the agreement and provide staff with alternate direction.

Background/Analysis
In September 2025, Choose Redding Lodging hosted a tour for representatives from World Triathlon Corporation to gauge if the area surrounding the City would be a good location to host an IRONMAN 70.3 branded endurance triathlon (Race). On September 18, 2025, Choose Redding contacted the City to announce that WTC chose the Redding area for a three-year term with the first event scheduled for August 2026 with subsequent events in August 2027 and August 2028.

A draft agreement is currently being reviewed by staff that sets forth the expectations for both parties – WTC and the City, which is identified as the host/lead entity. As stated above, the host is tasked with a number of obligations that include support services; personnel; security; facilities; event coordination; permitting assistance; communications; parking; and in-kind services. Pursuant to the agreement, there are a number of tasks that are out of the City’s services, such as complimentary hotel rooms; ambulance and medical services; concessions; infrastructure equipment for electricity and lighting; lavatories; shuttles; and volunteers. To address these other services, staff is proposing to negotiate a third-party partnership agreement with Choose Redding.

Beyond the City’s and Choose Redding’s commitments, staff has connected with Shasta County, the California Department of Transportation, National Park Service, Redding Chamber of Commerce and Visit Redding to introduce the event and gather initial support. To date, all groups are generally supportive; willing to assist; and starting to analyze the impacts and feasibility of the event.

Environmental Review
This is not a project as defined under the California Environmental Quality Act, and no further action is required.

Council Priority/City Manager Goals
• Economic Development – “Facilitate and become a catalyst for economic development in Redding to create jobs, retain current businesses and attract new ones, and encourage investment in the community.”
Attachments
^Choose Redding -Letter of Commitment to Financial Support for WTC DRAFT Host Venue Agreement WTC 2026-2028
Packet Pg. 606 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) Packet Pg. 607
Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group)

HOST VENUE AGREEMENT
IRONMAN® 70.3® NORTHERN CALIFORNIA (2026-2028)
Confidential Agreement
This Host Venue Agreement (this “Agreement”) is made as of ________________, 2025 (the “Effective Date”) by and between WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION, a Florida corporation (“WTC”) and the host party indicated below (“Host”). WTC and Host are sometimes referred to herein individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties.” HOST:

CITY OF REDDING
Address: 777 Cypress Avenue, Redding, CA 96001
Attn: Steve Bade, Assistant City Manager
Email: [email protected]
Legal Notices Email:[email protected]
Location(s): REDDING, CALIFORNIA (the “Venue”)
Race(s)/Event:

In each Race Year (defined below), WTC shall be responsible for operating, in and around the Venue, an IRONMAN® 70.3®-branded endurance triathlon (comprising, subject to cancellation of any part thereof due to weather conditions or other reasons, a 1.2-mile swim, 56-mile bicycle ride, and 13.1-mile run) (the “Race”) and performing certain administrative, operational, and sales and marketing functions related thereto (collectively, and together with the Race and any additional races added under Item B-1(d), an “Event”).

Official Name of
Event:

The official name of the Event will be IRONMAN® 70.3® NORTHERN CALIFORNIA. WTC may elect to add the name of a “title” sponsor and/or “presenting” sponsor to the official name of the Event (e.g., “[Title Sponsor] IRONMAN® 70.3® NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, presented by [Presenting Sponsor]”).

Race Date(s)
The Race each year of the Term will occur on the following applicable dates (each, a “Race Date”):
• 2026 Race Date: August 16, 2026
• 2027 Race Date: August 15, 2027
• 2028 Race Date: August 13, 2028
Term of
Agreement:

This Agreement is effective beginning on the Effective Date, and will continue in effect until the date that is thirty (30) days after the 2028 Event, unless this Agreement is sooner terminated in accordance with the terms of this Agreement (the “Term”).

Annual Payment: With respect to each Event, Host shall, under the terms of Exhibit A, pay WTC the amounts stated in Exhibit A (each, an “Annual Payment”).

Host Support
Services:

Host shall timely provide to WTC (or, as the case may be, shall timely provide for WTC’s benefit), the services, equipment, value in-kind, personnel, and other items set forth in Exhibit C (collectively, the “Host Support Services”) for each Event.

Sponsorship &
Expo Vendor
Referrals:

Host shall not grant or sell sponsorships, official designations, Expo space, or any other rights at or in connection with the Event to any third parties.

Sponsorship
Benefits:

WTC shall provide Host with a sponsorship benefits package (for use solely by Host) to include Expo booth space, signage (advertising only the Host) at certain locations along the Race course, placement of Host’s logo on all public Event-related printed material produced by WTC, and placement of Host’s logo and Host’s banner advertisements on the Event Website.

Hospitality
Package; Race
Entries:

Should the Event include VIP/Hospitality packages, WTC shall provide Host with a hospitality package (for use solely by Host) to include twenty-five (25) complimentary sponsor hospitality passes for the Event for use by Host’s employees and representatives, which passes grant access to certain selective benefits at the Event (not all Events may offer a full suite of hospitality benefits).

Packet Pg. 608 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 2 of 21
Confidential Agreement
Additionally, WTC shall provide Host with ten (10) complimentary race entries (i.e., to participate as an age-group athlete) for the Event for use by Host subject to the terms of this Agreement. Each race entry is only for the specific race and specific year, and cannot be used for, or deferred for, entry in any other race or the designated race in a later year.

WTC reserves the right to deny the use by any specific individual(s) of any race entries or hospitality passes.

Additional Terms: The following exhibits, attached hereto, contain additional terms of this Agreement: Exhibit D (regarding intellectual property rights); and Exhibit E (general terms).

The Parties have executed and delivered this Agreement as of the Effective Date.

WTC:

WORLD TRIATHLON CORPORATION
HOST:

CITY OF REDDING
By: ______________________________
Name: SHANE FACTEAU
Title: COO
By: _______________________________
Name: JACK MUNNS
Title: MAYOR
Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 3 of 21
Confidential Agreement

EXHIBIT A
Annual Payments;
Wire Transfer Instructions
Regarding the Event
for Race Year
Annual Payment to be paid
by Host to WTC
Annual Payment
Due Date
2026 $200,000.00 January 1, 2026
2027 $210,000.00 January 1, 2027
2028 $220,500.00 January 1, 2028
Time is of the essence with respect to each such payment. All payments to WTC that are required or contemplated under this Agreement must be made in immediately available U.S. dollars via the following wire transfer instructions:

Bank Name: Bank of America, NY NY
Routing Number: 026009593
Account Name: World Triathlon Corporation
Account Number: 898052297785
SWIFT Code: BOFAUS3N
[HOST TO INSERT] Host’s billing contact information:
• Contact Name: ____________________________
• Email address: _____________________________
• Telephone number: _________________________
WTC will not change payment instructions and/or banking details by e-mail communication. If Host receives an e-mail from WTC requesting that Host wire or otherwise transfer funds, Host must confirm the request and any corresponding instruction(s) by telephone with WTC before Host initiates any transfer. Please confirm the request by calling WTC’s Accounts Receivable Department at (813) 327- 5613. WTC will not be responsible for any funds wired to an incorrect account. * * * * * *
Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 4 of 21
Confidential Agreement

EXHIBIT B
Event Specifics
B-1. General.
a. Authorization; Ownership. Host authorizes WTC to prepare and conduct an Event in and around the Venue during each year of the Term (each, a “Race Year”). WTC is and will be the owner of each Event and nothing herein constitutes a license by WTC to Host or to any third party to establish or operate any Event or Race.
b. Name. When referring to any Event, Host shall (and shall use reasonable efforts to cause relevant third parties to) at all times use such official name of the Event (including mention of the official title sponsor, if any, and the official presenting sponsor, if any). c. Event Changes. WTC may in its reasonable discretion, in order to improve any Event, institute changes in the implementation or structure of such Event; provided, however, that no material change may be made to any previously confirmed location or venue(s) without the prior written consent of both Parties.
d. Additional Races. WTC shall have the option to conduct, as part of any or all Events, a WTCowned 5K Fun Run and/or a 5150TM, IRONKIDS® and/or IRON GIRL® triathlon, duathlon, or run contemporaneously (e.g., during the same weekend) with the Race. WTC may create additional, race-specific logos for any such additional races conducted, and such logos will be subject to the same restrictions applicable to the Event Logo (as defined in Exhibit D) under this Agreement. e. World Championship Entries. With respect to certain eligible top finishers of the Race, WTC will award non-transferable qualifying slots for entry in the applicable IRONMAN 70.3 World Championship (“Championship Slots”). The number of Championship Slots applicable to each Race will be determined by WTC in its sole discretion, and may change each year.

B-2. Certain Obligations of Host.
a. Host Support Services. Unless otherwise expressly agreed to in this Agreement, Host shall provide the Host Support Services at Host’s own cost. Host Support Services may be modified from time to time by WTC in its reasonable discretion, provided that no such change (i) results in any material additional cost or expense to Host or (ii) requires Host to do anything Host is not authorized, or does not have legal jurisdiction, to do or cause to be done. b. Compliance with Law. In connection with each Event and Host’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement, Host shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. c. Operational Aspects. In order to facilitate proper and timely planning, implementing, and conducting of each Event by WTC, Host shall, and shall cause each of its representatives, agents, and contractors to, follow instructions, solely regarding Event-related operational or technical issues, from WTC or any third party designated by WTC.
d. Intellectual Property of WTC. Except with respect to the Event Logo (the use of which by Host being subject to Exhibit D), Host shall not, without WTC’s prior written consent, use any intellectual property rights of WTC, including without limitation the Ironman®, 70.3®, Iron Girl®, IRONKIDS®, Velothon®, Cape Epic®, 5150®, and Rock ‘n’ Roll® marks and names, the “M-Dot” logo, and the “K-Dot” logo. Host shall promptly inform WTC of any possible misuse or infringement by any person or entity of the Event Logo or any other intellectual property of WTC.

Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 5 of 21
Confidential Agreement
e. Information Updates. Host shall, upon request from WTC, promptly inform WTC as to the status of the performance of Host’s obligations hereunder, including without limitation regarding the Host Support Services.
f. Representations. Host covenants that each of the representations and warranties made by Host in Item E-2 will be true and complete at all times during the Term. g. Unauthorized Drones. During the Event, Host shall make commercially reasonable efforts to prohibit the use of drones in and around the Race course by third parties that have not been approved by WTC.

B-3. Certain Obligations of WTC. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, and with respect to each Event:
a. Operations, Equipment, and Personnel. Except to the extent required to be provided or obtained by Host as part of the Host Support Services, or as may be otherwise required under this Agreement, WTC shall provide for (or cause to be provided) all Race-related equipment, supplies, personnel (including volunteers and a local Race Director), training of personnel (including volunteers), Race manuals/programs, Race course route determination and design, Race course set-up and tear-down, online and on-site athlete registration and check-in, welcome functions, award ceremonies, procurement of facilities, facility decoration, and all other technical and operational aspects of the Race. WTC may require that each Event use Race timing, registration, photography, or other services provided by WTC or any of its affiliates, designees, or service providers.
b. Expo. WTC shall provide for a multi-day vendor exposition at each Event (the “Expo”), which Expo may be referred to as the “IRONMAN Village” or other name chosen by WTC. At the Expo, WTC (or its designee) may sell official IRONMAN®-branded (or any other) merchandise and services, and, to the extent approved in writing by WTC, Event sponsors and other Expo vendors may sell or otherwise distribute other merchandise and services. Except as may otherwise be required by applicable law, Host shall not charge or assess any fee, tax, surcharge, or other cost to or on any vendor, contractor, or any other party in connection with the Expo, or any athlete entry fees, sponsorships, or any other aspect of the Event. c. Website; Media; Broadcasts. WTC shall provide and maintain the official website that markets the Event (the “Event Website”), including a live global streaming webcast of the Race. WTC shall retain the rights to all imagery and audiovisual works in connection with each Event, including but not limited to, television broadcast or cablecast (live or tape-delay), radio broadcast, Internet broadcast (audio or video), videotaping, filming, and photography, all of which, as between WTC and Host, is the sole property of WTC and will not be reproduced, remarketed, or otherwise distributed or publicly displayed by Host without the written permission of WTC. WTC may, in its sole discretion, grant or license any or all of these rights to third parties or to Host.

B-4. Official Announcements; Promotions by Host.
a. Host Website. Host, on its website, shall prominently advertise the Event and the fact that Host is hosting the Event, and at all times during the Term shall prominently display a link, on its website, to the Event Website.
b. Announcements. Host shall not make any public announcements of a marketing or promotional nature (whether in writing, orally, via the Internet, or otherwise) of any Event without the prior written consent of WTC in each instance (which consent will not be unreasonably withheld), except that no such consent will be required to the extent such announcements are required of Host as part of the Host Support Services (or otherwise required of Host under the terms of this Agreement), or that:
i. are entirely administrative in nature, such as announcements informing the public Packet Pg. 612 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 6 of 21
Confidential Agreement
regarding operational logistics or public safety matters (e.g., road closures, Event dates, Venue access);
ii. include only information in the public domain; and
iii. are not for purposes of marketing or promotion.
c. Other Matters. Host shall not use the Event, any marketing opportunity related thereto or arising out of the Event, or the like, for any purpose other than to promote the Venue in a positive and universally appealing manner. To the extent Host is not prohibited by law from doing so, Host shall not permit any political statements, political campaign propaganda, or the like to be made (or made available) at the Event, or otherwise to be associated (or purported to be associated), whether directly or indirectly, with the Event or the marketing thereof. * * * * * *
Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 7 of 21
Confidential Agreement

EXHIBIT C
Host Support Services
With respect to each Event, and at no cost to WTC, Host shall, as the case may be, do, obtain, or provide (or cause to be done, obtained, or provided) the following:

C-1. Approvals & Permits. Host shall ensure that, at no cost to WTC, WTC timely receives all governmental, regulatory, and third-party approvals, permits, access rights, business licenses, consents, ordinance exemptions, commitments, and licenses necessary or useful in connection with performance by Host or WTC of this Agreement, including without limitation the conducting of the Event, the Race, and the Expo, closures of roadways, use of amplified sound and music by WTC in connection with the Event, and Host’s provision of the Host Support Services (collectively, the “Approvals & Permits”). Host shall ensure that, 180 days prior to the Event, all Approvals & Permits with respect to the Event are obtained, and that all Approvals & Permits will remain in effect for and during the Event; in each case at no cost to WTC (e.g., no charges for site fees, access fees, rental fees, closure fees, licensee fees, application fees, environmental impact fees, permit fees, etc.).

C-2. Ambulance Services. Host shall secure value-in-kind providers for EMS transport services for each Event. Host shall ensure that ambulances will be distributed strategically at the Venue, transition area, celebration areas, along the Race route, and the Event medical area. Host shall ensure that dedicated EMS units will be on hand to respond to emergency transport needs and the general public on the day of the Event.

C-3. Coordination of Welcome Experience with Host Hotels. With respect to all official Event/Host hotels Host shall:
a. Coordinate all official Event/Host hotel partners & housing services for the Events b. Conduct pre-Event training with hotel staff to understand demographic of guests c. Coordinate welcome signage onsite
d. Coordinate Event-branded key cards with all hotel partners e. Be responsible for Event information inventory at each official Event/Host hotel f. Coordinate all accommodation partners & housing service for the Event C-4. Coordination of Auxiliary Work Space. Host will provide good and efficient locations for auxiliary work space. Host shall supply the necessary workspace for the following Event needs and functions:
a. VIP function space
b. Victory celebration area (Finish Area)
c. Press conference – media and business center
d. Meeting rooms
e. Executive board rooms
f. Paved area for operations, logistics, shipping, and receiving g. Secured warehouse and storage space
C-5. Concessions. If WTC requests, Host shall make arrangements to provide food and beverage concessions for the Event, in which case Host shall retain all revenue from such requested food and beverage concessions.

C-6. Command Post Coordination. Host, at no cost to WTC, shall ensure a special command post will be temporarily installed on the site or at a satellite location, bringing together all three emergency services (police, fire, and ambulance), private security, volunteer security personnel, and communications.

C-7. Complimentary Hotel Rooms. Host shall provide (or cause to be provided) to WTC 30 complimentary Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 8 of 21
Confidential Agreement
hotel room nights prior to each Event week and 150 complimentary hotel room nights during Event week at the official Event/Host hotel(s). All such hotels must be within a mutually agreed upon distance and proximity to Event venues. Host shall also assist WTC with the coordination of local hotels and other entities to facilitate arrangements for local accommodations, travel, and tourist activities.

C-8. Economic Impact Studies. To the extent the Parties agree that an economic impact study of the Event is necessary, Host shall be responsible for covering the cost of an economic impact study. As necessary to facilitate each study, WTC shall provide certain aggregate demographic and registration information (i.e., no personal data or contact information). WTC and Host will mutually agree upon the scope of each study and will work together to arrange for such study to be conducted. The report following such study shall be provided to WTC within sixty (60) days of each Event.

C-9. Electrical Services & Equipment. Host shall provide a special event electricity system (which shall meet the specific demands of each Event) and ultra-quiet generators for satellites and special Event sites including, but not limited to, all medical emergency areas and the finish line. Host shall cause power hookups to be provided by certified technicians under the applicable construction codes and regulations.

C-10. Event Lighting. To the extent lighting is already present at the Venue and available for use by Host, Host shall supply lighting for the Venue areas such as the transition area, swim, bike, and run courses, medical, and the finish area. To the extent such lighting is not already present at such sites or is not available for use by Host, any additional lighting required shall be supplied at the cost of Host.

C-11. Host Management Team. With respect to each Event, Host shall provide (and provide fair compensation to) a professional management team who will be responsible for: (a) working with WTC to organize and finalize the details of each Event, and (b) ensuring a high level quality Event for WTC’s operations and staff and to Event participants and their families, friends, and spectators.

C-12. Internet Service. Host shall provide high speed internet service to all WTC workspaces (including, without limitation, all VIP areas, media areas, Expo areas, merchandising tents, athlete village areas, the transition area, and the beach/ swim areas) and, upon WTC’s request, Host shall provide high speed internet for WTC’s television productions of the Event (the specifications of such internet shall be in accordance with the industry standards for televised world-class sporting events).

C-13. Lavatories. Host shall supply the necessary lavatories for the Event needs and functions.

C-14. Law Enforcement Services. Host shall be responsible for all costs associated with providing law enforcement personnel and services required for public safety and enforcement of traffic control plans throughout the Event. Host shall coordinate with local and regional police services (including without limitation, the Shasta County Sheriff’s Department, California State Troopers, Redding Park Rangers, and Redding City Police)to ensure adequate staffing and effective coverage of all Event areas, including roads, venues, and crowd zones.

C-15. Lead Agency. Host shall serve as the “lead agency” to support the operational activities of the Event, including but not limited to facility and venue acquisition, permitting, police and emergency services acquisition, parking acquisition, communications acquisition, local accommodations, travel, volunteer recruitment, media, public awareness, and advocacy.

C-16. Media Coverage. Host shall promote the Event in Host’s owned media including coverage using its website, printed materials, frequent social media posts, and emails to its subscribers.

C-17. Medical Professionals. WTC shall provide its official medical plan to Host and shall provide a reasonable opportunity for Host to review and comment on the official medical plan prior to execution of this Agreement. Host shall provide a team of medical professionals, including a Medical Director, who will coordinate and implement WTC’s official medical plan. Host acknowledges that an Event medical team of no less than 30 licensed medical professionals will be required for the Event.

Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 9 of 21
Confidential Agreement
C-18. No Construction. Host shall use its best efforts to ensure that no structural, engineering, beautification, or other works occur that could in any way interfere with the Race or any other aspect of the Event.

C-19. Operations Support Staff. Host shall arrange and/or subcontract for sufficient manpower to adequately assist WTC with operations for the Event (e.g., including but not limited to, the set up/take down of all Event venues, Race courses, finish line and celebration areas, banquet facilities, Expo space, and ancillary functions) (the “Operations Support Staff”). The Operations Support Staff shall report directly to WTC’s Race Director. Host shall cover all costs associated with locating and hiring the Operations Support Staff, including without limitation, all payments and benefits.

C-20. Parking. Host shall provide (or cause to be provided) satellite parking lots (with parking lot attendants) outside of the operations perimeter.

C-21. Participant and Spectator – Facing Venues. Host shall provide venues for the Event which shall consist of a large, centralized area for the transition area(s), swim bike and run routes, finish line, athlete recovery area, concessions, parking, VIP hospitality, merchandise sales, and spectator viewing. Host shall also provide adequate space to accommodate athlete check-in, consumer expo, merchandise sales, secured warehouse/storage space and parking. Host acknowledges that certain facilities will be required from the Tuesday before each Race until the Monday immediately following each Race.

C-22. Partnership Meeting Space. Host shall provide complimentary convention area space (or such other adequate meeting space) during Event week as required by WTC for WTC’s partnership meetings.

C-23. Public Grants and Support. Host shall use best efforts to raise public grants and support for the Event.

Host shall be entitled to keep any and all sponsorship fees, grants, financial support, or subventions of any nature whatsoever from or paid to Host by the federal government, any state government, any municipal government, government board, government institution, or government firm relative to the Event.

C-24. Race Course Exclusivity and Condition.Host shall ensure that all roads, waterways, and all other public spaces to be used for the Race are closed to the public (to the extent such closure(s) are possible, but at a minimum, Host shall restrict access to all roads, waterways, and other public spaces to the best of its ability) during the Race (and for a reasonable period before and after the Race) and are made exclusively available to WTC during such periods. Host shall ensure that all Race routes within Venue limits are in good condition during the Event.

C-25. Resident Notifications. Host shall create and disburse resident notifications (to be pre-approved by WTC). Such notifications shall be sent to residents and businesses in areas impacted by the Event and the Race route and shall communicate any/all applicable road closures, traffic advisories, and impacts during the Event week and on the Race Date.

C-26. Security Services. Host shall provide security services and a sufficient number of security guards for all Event areas from the time that Event operations start until Event operations are complete.

C-27. Shuttle Services. Host shall provide (or cause to be provided) dedicated Race day shuttle buses to transport athletes and spectators in and around the Venue.

C-28. Street Cleaning. Host shall be responsible for sweeping and cleaning up all streets and other areas prior to and after each Event.

C-29. Swim Course Ingress/Egress. Host shall ensure safe and adequate ingress and egress for the swim portion of the Race. This includes access points that accommodate athlete entry and exit, crowd control, and emergency response accessibility.

C-30. Swim Site Access Fees and Permitting. Host shall pay and/or waive all access fees in connection with the swim portion of the Event including, without limitation, all site fees, visitor fees, park rentals, and all other fees related to user or access to the swim area facilities and amenities within the Venue.

Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 10 of 21
Confidential Agreement
C-31. Terrorism and Counterterrorism Measures. To the extent such measures are required by law or to the extent such measures are deemed necessary by local law enforcement (e.g., for the safety of the Event participants and spectators), Host shall be responsible for any and all costs for counterterrorism measures required in connection with the Event, including, without limitation, anti-terrorism personnel, equipment (e.g., suppression vehicles, jersey barriers, surveillance, etc.), and services.

C-32. Traffic Control Services and Devices. Host shall provide all traffic control services and devices for each Event (including, without limitation, all personnel, devices, engineering diagrams, variable message boards, barricades, cones for traffic control, special event traffic signage, parking signs, temporary traffic light systems, traffic control vehicles equipped with yellow arrows, and plans to assure maximum road safety in partnership with local and regional police services).

C-33. Volunteer Director. Host shall designate an individual to serve as the volunteer director for each Event (the “Volunteer Director”), who will be responsible for managing volunteer operations, including recruitment, scheduling, and on-site coordination.

C-34. Volunteer Recruitment. Host shall be responsible for assisting WTC with the recruitment of approximately 1,000 experienced Event volunteers to support the Event. Volunteers shall participate in a range of roles throughout the duration of the Event, including but not limited to course operations, athlete services, venue setup, and general support functions.

C-35. Waste Management Service. Host shall maintain and ensure a clean environment at all times on its properties. Adjustments will be put in place by Host in accordance with the special needs of each Event.

Recycle containers, garbage units, large units for disposal, transportation, and manpower will be provided by Host. Host shall cause all trash bagged at participant aid stations within Venue limits to be removed by Host’s waste management service.

C-36. Water (Drinking) Supply. Host shall provide sufficient access to drinking water for the Event (as determined by WTC at WTC’s sole and absolute discretion).

C-37. Water Safety Personnel and Equipment. Host shall be responsible for any and all costs to provide all water safety personnel and equipment necessary for the safe operation of the swim course. This includes, without limitation, lifeguards, paddleboards, kayaks, personal watercraft (PWCs), motorized boats, and any required tents or staging areas. Host shall bear all costs associated with water safety staffing and assets.

C-38. Welcome Banquet Services. Host, in consultation with WTC, shall provide (or cause to be provided) all Welcome Banquet services for the Event’s Welcome Banquet (e.g., including, but not limited to, venues, entertainment, viewing areas and seating, equipment, food, drinks, etc.). Host shall use best efforts to ensure that all Event guests have a memorable Welcome Banquet experience (and that such experience shall be commensurate with the Welcome Banquet experience provided at other similar IRONMAN®- branded events.

C-39. Year-Round Warehouse Space. Host shall provide approximately 10ft x 20ft of warehouse space yearround as necessary to house Event equipment. * * * * * *
Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 11 of 21
Confidential Agreement

EXHIBIT D
Intellectual Property Rights
D-1. Grant of Limited Rights. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, WTC hereby grants to Host the limited, non-assignable, non-sublicensable, non-exclusive license to use, during the Term, the Event Logo (as defined in Exhibit D-1) in all reasonable forms of advertising and marketing, but only to the extent related to promotion of the Events, and subject in each instance to WTC’s prior written approval, which will not be unreasonably withheld. All uses of the Event Logo by Host must comply with the Trademark Standards & Usage Guidelines set forth in Exhibit D-1.

D-2. No Use on Products. Host shall not use, and shall not authorize, license, or permit any third party to use, the Event Logo on or in connection with any products, merchandise, souvenirs, or other goods or services, in each instance unless pre-approved by WTC in writing.

D-3. Ownership; Goodwill. Host acknowledges that WTC is the owner of the Event Logo and Host shall not register, or apply to register, the Event Logo, any service mark, trademark, or domain name that is similar in any manner to, or that incorporates, the Event Logo, any of WTC’s other trademarks or other intellectual property, or any mark with the word “IRON,” or any equivalent term or phrase in any language. All goodwill and rights accruing or arising under the Event Logo, or in any copyrights or other intellectual property of WTC used in connection with this Agreement or any Event, enures solely to the benefit of WTC. * * * * * *
Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 12 of 21
Confidential Agreement
EXHIBIT D-1
Trademark Standards & Usage Guidelines: Event – Specific Logo Sample Event Logo
Each Event will feature one or more IRONMAN 70.3®-branded logos customized by WTC for such Event (each, an “Event Logo”). WTC will design, create, and provide each Event Logo. The following is an example of an event logo from a different event:

WTC may elect to, from time to time, modify the Event Logo by adding the name of a “title” sponsor or “presenting” sponsor to such logo.

General
The Event Logo must be used consistently and not altered. Modifications, variations, and incorrect uses of any Event Logo dilute the IRONMAN® brand and create consumer confusion, and are therefore not permitted. You play a vital role in protecting the integrity of WTC’s intellectual property, such as the Event Logo. Please familiarize yourself with the following TRADEMARK STANDARDS &USAGE GUIDELINES, which you are required to follow when using any Event Logo in connection with any Event.

Pre-Approval Requirement
Without exception, all proposed uses of the Event Logo must be submitted to WTC for review PRIOR TO USAGE. All approval requests for use of any Event Logo must be submitted, along with a high resolution PDF image of the proposed use, to [email protected] for review by WTC. Please allow at least ten (10) business days for all approval requests to be answered. Any proposed use or item submitted that is not approved by WTC in writing within fifteen (15) days shall be deemed disapproved.

Trademark Ownership & Required Notice
Each Event Logo is, and shall remain, the property of WTC. Any and all rights to, in, and under the Event Logo, or any copyright or other intellectual property of WTC, shall enure solely to the benefit of WTC.

Notice must be given to the public that World Triathlon Corporation claims ownership of the Event Logo.

Therefore, the following legal notice must clearly appear, in no smaller than 6-point size typeface, on all of your printed materials, products, websites, and all other items on which any Event Logo is used:

IRONMAN® and 70.3® are registered trademarks of World Triathlon Corporation.

Used herein by permission.

Other Requirements
Each use by Host of the Event Logo must:
• Be solely and directly related to performing Host’s obligations, or exercising its rights, under this Agreement;
• Not be on any merchandise or services for sale or distribution (except to the extent expressly and specifically authorized by this Agreement or separate written agreement with WTC); • Not constitute or involve transfer or assignment of the License or sub-license of any Event Logo; and • Not have anything embedded in, added to, or superimposed on the Event Logo, or have any colors or color scheme different than that approved by WTC.

General
Do not use “iron” (or any foreign translation thereof) as a prefix for, or component of, any words – whether displayed as one word (e.g., “ironwoman”, “ironfamily”, or “ironmate”), as two separate words (e.g., “iron woman”, “iron family”, or “iron mate”), or as a hyphenated word (e.g., “iron-woman”, “iron-family”, or “iron-mate”). (Exceptions include IRONMAN®, IRONKIDS®, and IRON GIRL®, all of which are trademarks owned by WTC.) Please adhere to the following regarding use of the terms “IRONMAN®” and “IRONMAN® 70.3®”:
• IRONMAN® must be a single word, never hyphenated, and never capitalized as “IronMan”. • IRONMAN® and 70.3® must be two (2) separate words separated by no more and no less than one (1) Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 13 of 21
Confidential Agreement
character space.
• IRONMAN® is a brand name – an identifier of a specific source of goods and services. It is not an indicator of distance. “IRONMAN” must never be used as a standalone term or to denote distance. (e.g., never as “Ironman distance” or “Iron distance”).
• IRONMAN® 70.3® is a brand name – an identifier of a specific source of goods and services. It is not an indicator of distance. “IRONMAN” must never be used as a standalone term or to denote distance. (e.g., never as “half ironman”, “half ironman distance”, or “half iron distance”). • 70.3® is a brand name – an identifier of a specific source of goods and services. It is not an indicator of distance. “70.3” must never be used as a standalone term to denote distance. (e.g., never as “70.3 miles”) • IRONMAN® should never be abbreviated as “IM.”
• IRONMAN® 70.3® should never be abbreviated as “IM70.3.” • Stand-alone references to “an IRONMAN” or “a 70.3” are improper. Please add “triathlon” to such phrases (e.g., “an IRONMAN® 70.3® triathlon”).

Please adhere to the following regarding use of the terms “IRONKIDS®”:
• IRONKIDS® must be a single word, never hyphenated, and “IronKids” is always capital letter “I” and capital letter “K” when used in title case.
• IRONKIDS® is a brand name – an identifier of a specific source of goods and services. It is not an indicator of distance. “IRONKIDS” must never be used as a standalone term or to denote distance. (e.g., never as “IronKids distance”).
• IRONKIDS® should never be abbreviated as “IK.”
• Stand-alone references to “an IRONKIDS” are improper. Please add “dip ‘n’ dash” or “fun run” or other applicable word to such phrase (e.g., “an IRONKIDS® fun run”). * * * * * *
Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: 10-7-25 Staff Report (9.1(d)--Memorandum of Understanding with Redding Tourism Marketing Group) HOST VENUE AGREEMENT- Page 14 of 21
Confidential Agreement

EXHIBIT E
General Terms
E-1. Financial Matters.
a. Annual Payments. With respect to each Event, Host shall pay to WTC the Annual Payment under the terms of Exhibit A.
b. Sponsorship & Expo Vendor Referrals. Host shall comply with the Sponsorship & Expo Vendor Referrals terms outlined in the table on Page 1.
c. Taxes. The Annual Payment(s) set forth in Exhibit A are exclusive of taxes or fees, which are the responsibility of Host. All taxes and fees (including without limitations any foreign taxes and fees (e.g., sales tax, HST, VAT)) shall be borne by Host and shall be applied in accordance with the then applicable tax laws for each respective state, province, country, or otherwise. d. Entry Fees; Other Revenues. Except as may be otherwise expressly specified in this Agreement, WTC shall be entitled to receive and retain all Event/Race entry fees, and all other revenues and value in-kind in connection with the Events, including without limitation all revenues from merchandise sales, sponsorships, hospitality passes, VIP passes, exposition booth sales, product licenses, television licenses, and photograph sales.
e. Costs. To the extent Host does not timely provide any portion of the Host Support Services (as defined below), then, upon written request from WTC, Host shall, within thirty (30) days after delivery of such notice to Host, reimburse WTC to the extent WTC incurs, or will incur, any costs to obtain or provide any such Host Support Services not provided by Host. Such right of reimbursement does not limit WTC’s remedies with respect to Host failing to provide any of the Host Support Services.
f. Costs of Additional Security Measures. Should local and/or governmental authorities determine that enhanced security measures are necessary and must be implemented surrounding the Event, and should such measures have additional costs associated with them, the Parties will work together to discuss a reasonable and appropriate allocation of expenses to cover such costs.