Agenda packet, regular meeting — Redlands City Council, November 15, 2022 (part 2 of 5)

the south.

II. COST BENEFIT FACTORS:

The cost benefit factors are evaluated independently using the cost benefit model. A positive or negative cost/benefit ratio will be derived by evaluating projects. A complete model used to evaluate the project is available in the Development Services Department.

A summary of that analysis is provided here:

According to the Cost/Benefit Model used by the City, this project will provide the City approximately $30,965 in annual revenue and annual costs of $5,289, resulting in a positive balance of $25,675 (a positive Cost/Benefit Ratio of +5.85) over the period between 2022-2031.

III. PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND EFFECT ON THE CITY OF REDLANDS:

Identify the public infrastructure required for development of this project and identify the source(s) of funding for these improvements. Identify the effects of such development upon the City of Redlands.

List of public infrastructure required for the project:

The applicant will provide the on-site infrastructure as required by the Municipal Utilities & Engineering Department. As the project site is surrounded by existing public improvements and utility lines, the project is able to connect to existing utilities. The project site is an infill site as all surrounding sites have been developed and the subject site is surrounded by roadways on the north, east and west. Those roadways will be improved along the project’s frontage as a result of the proposed project. In addition, the project proposes storm drains, sewer and water mains as well as fire related improvements on-site that will connect to existing infrastructure in the adjacent roadways.

The effect of the project upon the City of Redlands relative to public infrastructure:

The proposed project will not significantly impact existing public infrastructure systems. The proposed improvements will connect to existing infrastructure surrounding the project site (public streets, domestic water, sewer, storm drain, etc.). The project will construct public sidewalks adjacent to the project site. Any other impacts would be offset by the payment of applicable permit and inspection fees and development impact fees (sewer, water, and transportation impact fees), etc.

The effect of the project upon the City of Redlands relative to public infrastructure:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 260 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 3 of 21 ends

Proposed Project: This project will not significantly impact existing public infrastructure systems. As the project site is located- in a developed area, the proposed improvements will connect to existing infrastructure surrounding the project site (public streets, domestic water, sewer, storm drain, etc.). The project will also improve the project frontages along Naples Avenue, Wabash Avenue and Jasper Avenue. Any other impacts would be offset by the payment of applicable permit and inspection fees, development impact fees.

IV. BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT TO THE CITY OF REDLANDS
The following is a list of benefits that can be attributed to the proposed project. The benefits may fall into the categories identified or a miscellaneous category. Each benefit identified will be described in detail with supporting reasons as to how the item benefits the community.

A. Citrus Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project preserve citrus? The following are accepted ways to enhance or preserve citrus which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provide conservation easement(s) on citrus groves the City hopes to preserve.

2. Acquire citrus grove(s) and donate all or a portion of the grove to the City.

3. Enhance viability and productivity of existing groves by enhancing irrigation or adding frost water.

4. Maintain a viable buffer of citrus around the project (at least 3 rows).

5. Other ways to preserve citrus.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to citrus enhancement or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project will not affect citrus or agriculture, either directly or indirectly. The proposed project site is currently vacant and a new storage operation would be built on-site. The site is located in a heavily developed portion of the City and has a General Plan land use designation of Commercial.

B. Cultural Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve cultural aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve cultural aspects of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Contributes to “art in public places” concept to a minimum of 1% of total Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 261 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 4 of 21 ends

project value.

2. Contributes to the alleviation of problems at cultural sites.

3. Provides an electronic library available to the public.

4. Enhances or contributes to current services or cultural resources.

5. Contribute to performing arts venues.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to cultural enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project will pay the normal development impact fees that contribute towards capital improvements to enhance facilities such as the library and parks. The project will also provide additional revenue from sales tax, increased property tax assessment, business license tax, and other revenue sources that will indirectly provide funding which will contribute to enhancing and/or maintaining some of the cultural facilities within the City.

C. Heritage Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve heritage aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve heritage aspects of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Renovates existing historic homes.

2. The project has design features which include garage doors do not face street; 50% wrap around porch on 1-1/2 sides; broad overhangs on roof; driveway located on the side of house or a circular drive; decorative wood, masonry or wrought iron fence.

3. Adaptive reuse of historic structures in appropriate zones.

4. Forming a new or annexing to an existing historic district.

5. Designation of a structure as an individual historic resource.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to heritage enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project site is a vacant site that is surrounded by development in all directions and does not contain any historic resources. The project does not provide for any heritage enhancements or preservation.

D. Architectural Enhancements. Does the project enhance architectural aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance architectural aspects of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provide architectural or decorative enhancements to the Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 262 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 5 of 21 ends

project which exceed normal architectural standards.

2. Trees or other landscaping amenities that exceed minimum requirements.

3. Contribution of off-site enhancements in the public right-of-way, such as sidewalk installation and street tree replacement.

4. Assisting in undergrounding of utility lines.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to architectural enhancements, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project proposes a self-storage facility that will include eleven buildings and a leasing office building. The buildings will be designed with attractive architecture which will incorporate stucco, metal, stone veneer, and glass in the design. The project will also include perimeter landscaping with enhanced perimeter landscaping along the Wabash Avenue and Jasper Avenue frontages. Additionally, screening trees and shrubs will be provided along the proposed storage buildings at the northern and southern end of the site in an effort to further screen the project from Naples Avenue to the north and the adjacent, developed site to the south.

E. Historic Downtown Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve the historic downtown of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve the historic downtown of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Contributes financially to viability of core downtown within expanded downtown.

2. Renovate old buildings.

3. Within an expanded downtown extends DRBA streetscape enhancements.

4. Contributing to the restoration of original building facades of existing structures

5. Re-establishing historical “pedestrian oriented” street frontages where original buildings have been removed.

6. Provides unique adaptive use of historic building.

7. Contributes to alternative means of transportation.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to historic downtown enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The subject property is not located within the City’s Historic Downtown. However, the project will pay City established Development Impact Fees and provide additional revenue from sales tax, increased property tax assessment, business license tax, and other revenue sources that will indirectly provide funding that could be utilized to enhance and/or maintain the downtown Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 263 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 6 of 21 ends

district.

F. Job Enhancements. Does the project enhance jobs for the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance jobs for the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provides jobs for the community.

2. Brings in revenue from outside the city.

3. Internship opportunities for students at universities, high school and colleges.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to job enhancements, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project will construct a self-storage facility with a 700 square foot leasing office. At most, the project is anticipated to require two employees which represents 0.01% of the City’s anticipated employment growth between 2016 and 2035 as determined by the City’s General Plan update.

Therefore, the project does not substantially enhance jobs for the community.

G. Open Space Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve open space aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve open space within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Hardscape feature that enhances wildlife-water/food/ shelter.

2. Enhanced landscape on commercial project which conceals infrastructure.

3. Waterscaping which increases illusion of open space.

4. Provides open space in addition to zoning requirement.

5. Provides a Planned Residential Development

6. Provides a usable conservation easement across open space in perpetuity.

7. Preserves access for wildlife migration corridor.

8. Provides undisturbed refuge area for wildlife.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to open space enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project will not detrimentally impact any open space features or amenities of the City of Redlands, nor affect wildlife.

H. Park Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve parks of Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 264 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 7 of 21 ends

the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve parks within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Adds improved parkland.

2. Adds parkland beyond requirements.

3. Provides pedestrian and/or bike trails to parks or provides extension of existing pedestrian and/or bike trails from the project site.

4. Adds meeting rooms accessible to local groups on a frequent basis.

5. Improves or adds to existing landscape and/or streetscape at or near the project site.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to park enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project proposes a self-storage facility with a leasing office.

This type of development and location does not enable opportunities for the project to provide park enhancement or preservation. However, the applicant will pay the required Development Impact Fees which will benefit the City’s Park and Recreation Program. Additionally, the project will provide additional revenue to the City from sales tax, increased property tax assessment, business license tax, and other revenue sources that will indirectly provide funding that may be used to benefit City parks
I. Public Safety Enhancements. Does the project enhance public safety aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance public safety within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Security infrastructure is provided in an architecturally acceptable manner.

2. Exterior television monitoring on commercial project.

3. Provide a building site or fully equipped fire station or contributes to dedicated City account for future construction.

4. Provides significant additional fire equipment as determined by the Fire Department.

5. Provides for a police substation (subject to City approval).

6. Provides for a building site for a new facility.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to public safety enhancements, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The proposed project can be readily served by existing public safety personnel, equipment, and facilities. The City will require the developer to pay any applicable Development Impact Fees which have been established by the City to fund public facilities, including police and public safety services. The project Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 265 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 8 of 21 ends

will also provide additional revenue (from increased property tax assessments, sales tax revenues, business license revenue, utilities revenue, etc.), which will assist in funding police and public safety operations.

J. School Enhancements. Does the project enhance schools or their operations within the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance schools within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Senior citizen development adds revenue but no impact.

2. Provides day care and after school program(s).

3. Project is close to schools serving the project.

4. Contributes equipment or other enhancements to existing day care and after school programs.

5. Assist schools with land or financing (such as Mello Roos).

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to schools, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project is not a residential development and is not considered growth inducing in nature. The project will pay School Fees based on a commercial land use prior to building permit issuance.

K. Traffic. Does the project reduce traffic, enhance systems to improve traffic conditions or otherwise improve traffic within the community? The following are accepted ways to improve traffic within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provide financial mitigation which helps alleviate parking problems in town i.e. by contributing to the parking district.

2. Incorporate “traffic calming” elements into the design of the circulation system.

3. Support for alternative forms of public transportation or public transportation facilities.

4. Add biking and pedestrian access to off campus intellectual or entertainment resources.

5. Have a unique method of product/inventory delivery.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to traffic, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project will contribute toward the construction of necessary traffic improvements by improving the project’s frontage along Naples Avenue, Wabash Avenue and Jasper Avenue along with the payment of development impact fees established by the City of Redlands and paid at the time of permit issuance.The Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 266 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 9 of 21 ends

project and its future customers will also provide additional revenue to the City (resulting from increased property tax assessment, sales tax revenues, business license revenue, utilities revenue, etc.) which will indirectly benefit the City’s general fund (which contributes to roadway maintenance and improvements).

L. Wastewater System Enhancements. Does the project enhance the wastewater system within the community? The following are accepted ways to improve the wastewater system within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provide a dual system to use potable and non-potable water.

2. Provide financial contributions to tertiary facilities at the Wastewater Treatment Plant.

3. Improve water quality.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to the wastewater system, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project is not anticipated to have any potentially significant impacts to wastewater or sewer utilities within the City of Redlands. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation and the Highway Commercial (C-4) zoning and would be required to meet the requisites of the City of Redlands and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board regarding wastewater quality. The project would not require or result in the need to construct new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities in the City of Redlands, and will not exceed wastewater treatment capacities. The developer will also pay any applicable Development Impact Fees established by the City.

M. Miscellaneous Preservation or Enhancements. Does the project enhance or preserve elements within the community?
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to enhancement or preservation of elements that are important to the City, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project does not provide any additional or miscellaneous enhancements or preservation of elements within the community other than those previously identified.

SOCIAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:

This project may create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services for those social factors checked below within the "Potentially Significant" or “Potentially Significant Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 267 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 10 of 21 ends

Unless Mitigation” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

Agricultural/Citrus Removal
Wildlife/Habitat
Traffic
Fire Services
Paramedic Services
Police Services
Downtown Impacts
Residential Design
Cultural Facilities
Park Facilities
Recreational Programs
Land Use Compatibility
Schools
V. DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

X I find that the proposed project will not create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, and no additional information or evaluation is needed.

I find that although the proposed project could create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project by the applicant.

I find that the proposed project may create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, and additional information or evaluation is needed in the following areas:

I find that the proposed project has already been evaluated for socio-economic impacts and the prior evaluation adequately evaluated this project.

Signed:

Tamara Harrison,
Contract Planner
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 268 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 11 of 21 ends

VI. EVALUATION OF SOCIAL FACTORS
Explanations of all "Potentially Significant," "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated," "Less Than Significant Impact," and "No Impact" answers are provided on the attached pages.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

1. AGRICULTURAL/CITRUS REMOVAL.

Would the proposal:
a) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g.
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)? 
b) Remove active citrus groves from production? 
Agricultural/Citrus Removal – Discussion
a, b) The project site is located in the northeast portion of the City of Redlands. The project site is identified in the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency as “Grazing land.” The Project Site is not identified to as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Historical aerial photographs show the property ceased agricultural uses sometime on or before 1980 and is not currently part of a larger farmland, orchard, or other agricultural purpose. Therefore, no impacts to farmland would result, and no mitigation measures are warranted.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 269 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 12 of 21 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

2. WILDLIFE/HABITAT/OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION.

Would the proposal:
a) Eliminate or have negative impact upon wildlife
corridors?
b) Tend to urbanize open space
impacting preservation and
conservation of natural resources?



c) Interfere with use of recognized trails
used by joggers, hikers, equestrians
or bicyclists?
d) Eliminate, reduce, or have any negative
impact upon wildlife habitat areas to include
the protection of fringe or buffer areas?



Wildlife/Habitat/Open Space Preservation – Discussion
a) The project site is located in a commercial area of the City of Redlands. The project site’s proximity to urbanized areas and the commercial development of the surrounding area, along with the lack of vegetation preclude the potential for wildlife corridors to occur on the project vicinity. There will be no impacts. b) The project site is in an area designated by the General Plan for commercial use.

The project site is currently vacant but is highly disturbed and contains no natural resources. The project would not urbanize open space areas that could impact preservation and conservation of natural resources. There will be no impacts.

c) The project will not interfere with the use of any recognized trails, and there are no impacts.
d) The Project Site consists of disturbed land and is largely devoid of native vegetation.

Vegetation communities onsite consisted primarily of disturbed ruderal grassland.

Disturbances observed on the site were mainly associated with non-native species, vehicle tracks. Of the 49 special-status wildlife species identified in the literature review and database searches, one was found to have a low potential to occur onsite: burrowing owls. Although no burrowing owls or signs of burrowing owl Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 270 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 13 of 21 ends

inhabitation were observed on the site, standard mitigation measures are included to ensure there will be no impacts if they move onto the site prior to construction occurring. Impacts will be less than significant with the proposed mitigation.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

3. TRAFFIC.

Would the proposal:
a.) Result in increased vehicle trips or
congestion?
b.) Create additional traffic so as to be in
conflict with the policies of the General Plan?
c.) Does traffic impact livability of a residential
neighborhood on streets which, due to design
or terrain features, street side development or
other factors, have greater than usual
sensitivity to increased traffic?





d.) Create additional traffic so as to increase the level of service on roadways that are adjacent to or in the
vicinity of the project? 
Traffic – Discussion
a, b, c, d) The project involves the construction of a self-storage facility consisting of eleven buildings totaling 123,456 square feet with 835 storage units a 700 square foot leasing office and related site improvements to include the necessary driveways, sidewalks, and perimeter improvements, on the south side of Naples Avenue between Wabash Avenue and Jasper Avenue. Wabash is a north-south road with two lanes and a scramble lane, and Jasper Avenue is a two-lane road collector that also travels north and south. The Traffic Impact & VMT Assessment Letter provided during review of the application indicates that the significance threshold of 50 peak hour trips to is not exceeded, and due to the small number of trips forecast to be generated, traffic impacts are deemed less than significant. The developer will also pay any applicable development impact fees, such as sewer, water, and transportation impact fees. All impacts are anticipated to be less than significant.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 271 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 14 of 21 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

4. FIRE & PARAMEDIC SERVICES.

Will the proposal result in:
a) Requiring fire and paramedic services that are
beyond the current capabilities of the Fire
Department?

b) An increase in response time for essential fire or
paramedic services to the remainder of the
community? 
c) The need for additional fire or paramedic facilities or equipment?

Fire & Paramedic Services – Discussion
a) The project proposes the construction of a new self-storage facility. All buildings will be required to be constructed according to current California Building Code and California Fire Code standards. Existing fire and paramedic service capabilities provided by the City of Redlands are adequate to serve the project. No impacts are anticipated, and no mitigation is required.
b) The City of Redlands Fire Department provides fire and emergency medical services to the project site and vicinity. At this time, the Fire Department consists of approximately 55 total sworn personnel, including 18 firefighter/ paramedics and 37 firefighter/EMTs and covers an area of 37 square miles. At this present time, citywide level of service is expected to be 0.76 firefighters per 1,000 residents. Fire Department services are typically financed through the General Fund. The City would be able to provide adequate Fire Department services in a timely manner.

Therefore, the project is not expected to have any potentially significant impacts in terms of response times. No impacts are anticipated, and no mitigation is required. c) Present capabilities of the Fire Department will not be impacted with development of the project. There will be no need for additional fire or paramedic facilities or equipment. Future revenue from the project (e.g., increased property tax assessment, sales tax revenue, etc.) will assist in funding fire facilities, equipment, and operations for the City. No impacts are anticipated, and no mitigation is required.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 272 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 15 of 21 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

5. POLICE SERVICES.

Would the proposal result in:
a) Requiring police services that are beyond the
current capabilities of the Police Department? 
b) An increase in response time for essential police
services to the remainder of the community? 
c) The need for additional police facilities or
equipment?
d) Increase in crime as a result of the
type of business?




Police Services – Discussion
a-c) The City of Redlands Police Department currently provides services to the project site and vicinity. The Redlands Police Department personnel is made up of approximately 100 volunteers, 80 sworn officers and 58 full and part-time civilians, resulting in a service level of 1.12 officers per 1,000 residents. The Police Department contains an Operations Division and an Investigations and Support Services Division. In addition to sworn patrol officers, the Department has several sub-units, including Investigations, the Multiple Enforcement Team, Narcotics, and volunteers. The project is not expected to have any potentially significant impacts in terms of response times. There will be no need for additional police facilities or equipment. Police services are typically financed through the General Fund. Future revenue from the project (e.g., increased property tax assessment, sales tax revenue, etc.) will assist in funding police facilities, equipment, and operations for the City. No impacts are anticipated, and no mitigation is required. d) The project is not expected to result in any significant increase in crime. The proposed storage facility would be used at a low intensity by the local community, with a corresponding low rate of calls that can be expected for police service. Therefore, any impacts are considered to be less than significant.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 273 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 16 of 21 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

6. DOWNTOWN IMPACTS.

Would the proposal result in:
a) A reduction of the number or types of businesses
located in the downtown? 
b) An unfair or unreasonable competitive disadvantage
to existing businesses downtown?

c) Creation of vacant buildings and the potential for
blight?
d) Cause an unreasonable increase in
traffic downtown?
e) Economic and social effects of
businesses competing with downtown
businesses?




Downtown Impacts – Discussion
a-e) The project involves the construction of a self-storage facility approximately two miles from the downtown area. In addition, as a self-storage facility, there is no impact to the existing businesses in the downtown area. The project would not conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including but not limited to Level of Service (LOS) standards and travel demand measures within the City of Redlands, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways. In terms of the General Plan, the proposed project would not create any traffic or transportation system issues not already accounted for in the General Plan EIR. There will be no conflicts with the General Plan land use map or any policies, and no impacts are anticipated.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 274 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 17 of 21 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

7. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN.

Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with existing codes and or standards?

b) Meet minimum point standards of the Residential
Development Allocation process? 
Residential Design – Discussion
a) Not applicable. The proposal for the construction of a self-storage facility is not subject to the City’s design requirements for residential projects and is not subject to the Residential Development Allocation process outlined in the Redlands Municipal Code.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 275 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 18 of 21 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

8. CULTURAL FACILITIES.

Would the proposal result in:
a) Impacts to an historic residential structure,
neighborhood, or district?

b) Impacts to an historic commercial structure or
district?

c) Impacts to cultural facilities such as the Smiley
Library, Redlands Bowl, Lincoln Shrine, Joslyn
Center, Community Center, etc.?

d) Have the potential to cause a physical change which
would affect unique ethnic cultural values?

e) Potential to disturb existing religious facilities.
f) Impact or restrict religious or sacred uses.



Cultural Facilities – Discussion
a-d) The project site does not contain any historic residential structures and is not located in any historic neighborhoods or districts, so there are no known impacts to such resources. Furthermore, the project will not have any adverse impact to local cultural facilities or values as there are no applicable facilities or values associated with the site. There will be no impacts.
e, f) No part of this project has the potential to disturb existing religious facilities nor impact or restrict any religious uses. No impacts are anticipated.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
,
No
Impact

9. PARK FACILITIES & RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS.

Will the proposal result in:
a) Increases in use or demand for park facilities or
programs to include manpower, facilities or
equipment?

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 276 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 19 of 21 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
,
No
Impact
b) A ratio of parkland to population which exceeds
standards and or goals established by the General
Plan?

Park Facilities & Recreational Programs – Discussion
a, b) No Impacts. The proposed project will involve the construction of a self-storage facility. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to adversely affect existing or planned recreational facilities, nor create a significant new demand for additional recreational facilities. The project would also generate additional revenue to the City with increased property tax assessment and sales taxes, which will assist in funding park facilities and services. No detrimental impacts are anticipated.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 277 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 20 of 21 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

10. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY. Would the proposal result in:
a) Land uses that are not compatible or consistent with the General Plan?

b) Economic impacts on businesses and
small property owners from a project
c) Physical separation or division of an
existing community
d) Loss of jobs for the community?
e) Overcrowding of housing?





Land Use Compatibility – Discussion
a) No detrimental impacts are anticipated in terms of the General Plan. The land use designation is ‘Commercial’ for the subject property and vicinity, and upon adoption, the project will comply with all applicable policies of the General Plan. b) The project will not result in any detrimental impacts to businesses or small property owners. The project will develop a vacant lot and provide self-storage space for use by the local community. No detrimental economic impacts on businesses or small property owners are anticipated.
c) The project site is designed to be compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial developments. This project will in no way physically divides or separates the existing community. No impacts are anticipated.
d) The project will ultimately create several full-time and part-time jobs. The construction of the project will also create jobs, and not result in the loss of jobs to the community. No detrimental impacts are anticipated.
e) No part of this project has the potential to result in overcrowding of the current housing stock within the City. No impacts are anticipated.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 278 of 1131 Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
CUP 1168 – Go Stor-It Mini Storage

Page 21 of 21 ends

Issues and Supporting Information Sources: Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact

11. SCHOOLS. Would the proposal result in:
a) Creating an overcapacity in schools? 
b) The need for additional school facilities or
equipment?
c) Land uses not consistent with or
compatible with existing educational
facilities in community?
d) Social or academic impacts on
students resulting from school
closures.




Schools – Discussion
a-d) The project does not have the potential to adversely impact schools. School services within the City of Redlands are provided by the Redlands Unified School District.

The project will involve the construction of a new self-storage facility. It is anticipated that patrons of the business will be members of the local community and no impacts to schools would result in the above categories.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 279 of 1131 TABLE 1
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL
LAND USE SUMMARY:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 LAND USE 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 TOTAL

RESIDENTIAL UNITS
RURAL LIVING (0.2 - 0.4 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VERY-LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 2.7 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 6.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOW-MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 8.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 15.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HIGH DENSITY (0 - 27.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL, RESIDENTIAL UNITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CUMULATIVE, RESIDENTIAL UNITS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
PROJECT RESIDENTS /1
RURAL LIVING (0.4 - 0.2 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
VERY-LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 2.7 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 6.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LOW-MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 8.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 15.0 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HIGH DENSITY (0 - 27 du/acre) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TOTAL, PROJECT RESIDENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
CUMULATIVE, PROJECT RESIDENTS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
CUMULATIVE PROJECT ACREAGE /2
RURAL LIVING (0.4 - 0.2 du/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA VERY-LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 2.7 du/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 6.0 du/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA LOW-MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 8.0 du/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (0 - 15.0 du/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA HIGH DENSITY (0 - 27 du/acre) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA CUMULATIVE, PROJECT ACREAGE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 NA LAND NON-RESIDENTIAL ACRES, ANNUAL /3
RETAIL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
INDUSTRIAL 6.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6.3 DEVELOPER
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
ANNUAL TOTAL, NON-RESIDENTIAL 6.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3

LAND NON-RESIDENTIAL ACRES, CUMULATIVE
RETAIL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA
INDUSTRIAL 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 NA
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA CUMULATIVE TOTAL, NON-RESIDENTIAL 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 6.3 NA LAND NON-RESIDENTIAL EDU'S, CUMULATIVE /4
RETAIL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA
INDUSTRIAL 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 NA OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 NA CUMULATIVE TOTAL, NON-RESIDENTIAL EDU'S 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 NA BUILDING NON-RESIDENTIAL SQ.FT., ANNUAL
RETAIL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
INDUSTRIAL 122,756 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 122,756
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL 700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 700 DEVELOPER ANNUAL TOTAL, NON-RESIDENTIAL 123,456 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 123,456 BUILDING NON-RESIDENTIAL SQ.FT., CUMULATIVE
RETAIL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA
INDUSTRIAL 122,756 122,756 122,756 122,756 122,756 122,756 122,756 122,756 122,756 122,756 NA OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 700 NA CUMULATIVE TOTAL, NON-RESIDENTIAL 123,456 123,456 123,456 123,456 123,456 123,456 123,456 123,456 123,456 123,456 NA SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT.

NOTES:

1. Average number of residents per Dwelling Unit ("DU") provided by the California Department of Finance. 3. Assumes average non-residential site coverage of the following (based on the General Plan):

Residents per DU = 2.801 OTHER Retail 0.0%
Industrial 44.7%

2. Assumes residential acreage per unit of the following: Other Non-Residential 0.0% Lot Coverage Rural Living (less than 0.2 - 0.4 du/acre) NA
Very-Low-Density Residential (0 - 2.7 du/acre) NA
Low-Density Residential (0 - 6.0 du/acre) NA 4. Assumes non-residential equivalent dwelling units of the following:

Low-Medium-Density Residential (0 - 8.0 du/acre) NA EDUs per acre = 6.0 OTHER Medium-Density Residential (0 - 15.0 du/acre) NA
High Density (0 - 27.0 du/acre) NA GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUTPROJ. Sq. Ft.* F.A.R.* Projected Acreage RETAIL 8,646,200 0.30 661.63
INDUSTRIAL 10,048,400 0.40 576.70 OTHER
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL 21,641,990 0.45 1,104.07
40,336,590 2,342.40
*As disclosed in the General Plan
Typical Home Size: 2,835 OTHER
Estimated Equivalency: 6.07
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 280 of 1131 TABLE 2
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL
LAND USE SUMMARY:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

ASSESSED VALUATION ASSUMPTIONS SECURED PROPERTY TAX ASSUMPTIONS RESIDENTIAL NET APPORTIONMENT FACTORS AS A FRACTION OF 1.0% TAX RATE RURAL LIVING ASSESSED VALUE $0
VERY-LOW-DENSITY ASSESSED VALUE $0 PROPERTY TAXES PASSED THROUGH TO CITY /1 20.00% CITY LOW-DENSITY ASSESSED VALUE $0
LOW-MEDIUM-DENSITY ASSESSED VALUE $0 1. Based on amount disclosed in the adopted 1998-99 budget.

MEDIUM-DENSITY ASSESSED VALUE $0
HIGH DENSITY ASSESSED VALUE $0

NON-RESIDENTIAL UNSECURED PROPERTY TAX ASSUMPTIONS
RETAIL ASSESSED VALUE $0.00
INDUSTRIAL ASSESSED VALUE $104.50 DEVELOPER RESIDENTIAL:

OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL ASSESSED VALUE $0.00 UNSECURED TAXES AS A % OF SECURED 2.75% CITY NON-RESIDENTIAL:

UNSECURED TAXES AS A % OF SECURED 10.00%
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 SECURED ASSESSED VALUE CALCULATION:

ANNUAL ASSESSED VALUES (YEARLY INCREASE)

RESIDENTIAL
RURAL LIVING $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
VERY-LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
LOW-MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

NON-RESIDENTIAL
RETAIL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
INDUSTRIAL $12,828 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL $12,828 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL YEARLY VALUATION INCREASE: $12,828 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

CUMULATIVE ASSESSED VALUES

NON-RESIDENTIAL
RETAIL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
INDUSTRIAL $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 TOTAL CUMULATIVE ASSESSED VALUE $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 $12,828 SECURED PROPERTY TAX REVENUE CALCULATION:

CITY OF REDLANDS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 TOTAL SECURED TAX REVENUES TO CITY $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 UNSECURED PROPERTY TAX REVENUE CALCULATION:

CITY OF REDLANDS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3
TOTAL UNSECURED TAX REVENUES TO CITY $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 TOTAL PROPERTY TAXES TO CITY $28 $28 $28 $28 $28 $28 $28 $28 $28 $28 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 281 of 1131 TABLE 3
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL
LAND USE SUMMARY:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

RESIDENTIAL INDIRECT SALES TAX GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS BUSINESS DIRECT SALES & USE TAX GENERATION ASSUMPTIONS PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX ASSUMPTIONS AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD INCOME ASSUMPTIONS: SALES TAXES PASSED THROUGH TO CITY, APPLIED TO COSTS: /1 1.00% CITY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TURNOVER RATE 10.00% CITY MEASURE 'I' TAXES PASSED THROUGH TO TRANSIT AUTHORITY 0.00% BUS & COM PROPERTY TURNOVER RATE 5.00% WEIGHTED AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL PRICE $0 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAXES 0.00% TRANSFER TAX AS A % OF RESALE DOLLAR 0.11% AVERAGE RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGE (20% DOWN) $0 DISPLACED EXISTING CITY SALES TAX 33.33% PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX PASSED THROUGH TO CITY 50.00% ANNUAL MORTGAGE PAYMENTS @ 6.50% & 30 YEARS $0 CITY PROJECT RETAIL TAXABLE SALES PER SQ. FT:

AVG. HOUSEHOLD INCOME (3:1 INCOME/PAYMENT RATIO): $0 RETAIL $0.00 RETAIL TAXABLE EXPENDITURE (% OF INCOME): 25.0% INDUSTRIAL $0.00 PROJECT RESIDENTS' PURCHASES OUTSIDE PROJECT 50.0% OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL $0.00 DEVELOPER AND WITHIN INCORPORATED CITY:

1. Based on amount passed through to city in the adopted 1997-98 budget.

YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 SALES & USE TAX REVENUE CALCULATION (CUMULATIVE):

INDIRECT SALES TAX GENERATION
RESIDENTIAL TAXABLE EXPENDITURES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL TAXABLE PURCHASES WITHIN CITY $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 RESIDENTIAL SALES TAX GENERATION $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

DIRECT SALES TAX GENERATION
RETAIL TAXABLE SALES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
INDUSTRIAL TAXABLE SALES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL TAXABLE SALES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SUB-TOTAL DIRECT TAXABLE SALES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LESS: DISPLACED EXISTING CITY SALES TAX $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL DIRECT TAXABLE SALES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL DIRECT SALES TAX GENERATION $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PROJECT SALES & USE TAX REVENUES, APPLIED TO COSTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 RESIDENTIAL MEASURE 'I' SALES TAXES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NON-RESIDENTIAL MEASURE 'I' SALES TAXES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 RESIDENTIAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAXES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NON-RESIDENTIAL LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAXES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL PROJECT SALES & USE TAX REVENUES, FOR TRANSPORTATION $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX CALCULATION (CUMULATIVE):

RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAXES $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NON-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY TRANSFER T AXES $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 $0.35 TOTAL ANNUAL PROPERTY TRANSFER TAXES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 282 of 1131 TABLE 4
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL
LAND USE SUMMARY:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

BUSINESS LICENSE FEE REVENUE FRANCHISE FEES (PER CAPITA) TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX

RESIDENTIAL NA RESIDENTIAL NON-RESIDENTIAL NUMBER OF AVAILABLE HOTEL ROOMS NON-RESIDENTIAL TOTAL FRANCHISE $16.71 $16.71 OCCUPANCY RATE

BUSINESS LICENSE FEES ARE CHARGED AT A RATE EQUAL AVERAGE BILLING RATE PER ROOM TO $12 FOR THE FIRST $5,000 IN GROSS SALES, PLUS $3 % PASSED THROUGH TO CITY FOR EACH ADDITIONAL $5,000 INCREMENT IN GROSS SALES. AVERAGE YEARLY OCCUPANCY REVENUES TO CITY YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031

BUSINESS LICENSE FEE REVENUE

RESIDENTIAL

RURAL LIVING NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

VERY-LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

LOW-MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

MEDIUM-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

TOTAL RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA

NON-RESIDENTIAL
RETAIL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
INDUSTRIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, BUSINESS LICENSE FEE REVENUE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

FRANCHISE FEE REVENUE
RESIDENTIAL FRANCHISE FEES $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL FRANCHISE FEES $0.636 $0.636 $0.636 $0.636 $0.636 $0.636 $0.636 $0.636 $0.636 $0.636 TOTAL, FRANCHISE FEE REVENUE $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1

TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE
TOTAL, TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX REVENUE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 283 of 1131 TABLE 5
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL

OTHER REVENUE AND REVENUE SUMMARY

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
OTHER GENERAL REVENUES (PER CAPITA METHOD) /1 INCOME FROM INVESTMENTS OTHER TAXES /2 $10.86 EFFECTIVE INTEREST 2.50% OTHER
OTHER REVENUES $6.96

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NA

LIBRARY NA

POLICE DEPARTMENT NA

POLICE - ANIMAL CONTROL NA

POLICE - RECREATION NA

POLICE - SENIOR SERVICES NA

FIRE NA

PUBLIC WORKS NA
SUBTOTAL, OTHER REVENUES PER CAPITA: $17.83

1. See Appendix for calculation of per capita multipliers. For items without values, a net cost technique is being employed.

2. Other Taxes includes Public Safety Sales Tax.

YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031

PER CAPITA REVENUES

OTHER TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, OTHER TAXES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

OTHER REVENUES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1
TOTAL, OTHER LICENSES, PERMITS & FINES $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, STATE REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

LIBRARY
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, FEDERAL REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

POLICE DEPARTMENT
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, CITY ATTORNEY $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

POLICE - ANIMAL CONTROL
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, ENGINEERING SERVICES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

POLICE - RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, FIRE DEPARTMENT $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

POLICE - SENIOR SERVICES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, JOSLYN CENTER $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
FIRE
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, LIBRARY $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

PUBLIC WORKS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL, PARKS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL PER CAPITA REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL PER CAPITA REVENUES $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 TOTAL PER CAPITA REVENUES $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL CASE STUDY REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL CASE STUDY REVENUES $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 TOTAL CASE STUDY REVENUES $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 $29 RESIDENTIAL REV AVAILABLE FOR INV. INCOME $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NON-RESIDENTIAL REV AVAILABLE FOR INV. INCOME $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 TOTAL REVENUES AVAILABLE FOR INVESTMENT INCOME $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 $30 RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENT INCOME $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 NON-RESIDENTIAL INVESTMENT INCOME $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 TOTAL INVESTMENT INCOME $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1
SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 284 of 1131 TABLE 6
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL

POLICE DEPARTMENT, FIRE DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC WORKS & PER CAPITA COSTS

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS

POLICE DEPARTMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL CALLS 16,562 CITY
COST PER DWELLING UNIT $295
NON-RESIDENTIAL RETAIL CALLS 8,987
COST PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT $0.47
NON-RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL CALLS 344
COST PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT $0.02
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL CALLS 7,948
COST PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT $0.42
MISCELLANEOUS CALLS /2 17,628
TOTAL CALLS 51,469

1. Based on Net Cost and number of calls to residential or non-residential properties.

2. Based on conversations with the Police Chief, these incidences are not related to residences or businesses in the City.

EXISTING DWELLING UNITS 25,984 CITY
EXISTING NON-RESIDENTIAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 8,824,690
RESIDENTIAL FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS [1]
RESIDENTIAL CALLS 3,579 CITY
COST PER DWELLING UNIT $168
NON-RESIDENTIAL RETAIL CALLS 446
COST PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT $0.06
NON-RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL CALLS 155
COST PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT $0.02
OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL CALLS 1,459
COST PER BUILDING SQUARE FOOT $0.20
MISCELLANEOUS CALLS /2 1,988
TOTAL CALLS 7,627

1. Based on Net Cost and number of calls to residential or non-residential properties.

2. Based on information from Fire Chief, these incidences are not related to residences or businesses in the City.

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS /1 PUBLIC WORKS MAINTENANCE COSTS ROADS (LANE MILES) 0.0 DEVELOPER PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE PER LANE MILE /1 $5,000 CITY TRAFFIC INTERSECTIONS REQUIRING SIGNALS 0.0 STREET SWEEPING PER CURB MILE - ALL STREETS /1 $9 AGGREGATE LANDSCAPING (ACRES) 0.0 TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE PER INTERSECTION /1 $5,560 PARK ACREAGE (GROSS) 0.0 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE PER ACRE /1 $12,500 STREET LIGHTS 0.0 PARK MAINTENANCE PER ACRE /1 $7,000
OPEN SPACE (ACRES) 0.0 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE COST PER LIGHT /1 $125 TRAILS (LINEAL MILE) 0.0 OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE PER ACRE /2 $125 STORM DRAINS (MILES) 0.0 TRAIL MAINTENANCE PER LINEAL MILE /2 $500 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE PER MILE /2 $750

1. Infrastructure should exclude privately maintained facilities.

1. Based on consultations with the City of Redlands Public Works Department.

2. Based on consultant's experience.

CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS* CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS CONTINUED CITY COUNCIL $174,090 TOTAL CITY OPERATING BUDGET* ########## CITY CLERK $285,939
CITY MANAGER $314,819 *Excludes Debt Service, Utilities and Capital Improvements.

FINANCE $605,155
CITY TREASURER $2,875,064 OVERHEAD AS A % OF OPERATING BUDGET 11.04% CITY ATTORNEY $1,159,167
TOTAL, CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS $5,414,234 OVERHEAD AS A % OF DIRECT COSTS 12.41% *Costs have been reduced to reflect department specific revenues. OVERHEAD BY DEFINITION CAUSING NO COST 0.00% OVERHEAD AS % OF DIRECT, AVERAGE 6.20%
OTHER NET COSTS (PER CAPITA METHOD) /1
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $29.49
LIBRARY $28.43

1. See Appendix for calculation of per capita multipliers.

YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029

CITY DIRECT COSTS

POLICE DEPARTMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL RETAIL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL $2.215 $2.215 $2.215 $2.215 $2.215 $2.215 $2.215 $2.215 $2.215 $2.215 OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL $0.292 $0.292 $0.292 $0.292 $0.292 $0.292 $0.292 $0.292 $0.292 $0.292 TOTAL, POLICE DEPARTMENT COSTS $2.507 $2.507 $2.507 $2.507 $2.507 $2.507 $2.507 $2.507 $2.507 $2.507

FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL RETAIL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL INDUSTRIAL $2.633 $2.633 $2.633 $2.633 $2.633 $2.633 $2.633 $2.633 $2.633 $2.633 OTHER NON-RESIDENTIAL $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 TOTAL, FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS $2.774 $2.774 $2.774 $2.774 $2.774 $2.774 $2.774 $2.774 $2.774 $2.774

PUBLIC WORKS COSTS
PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 STREET SWEEPING $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 TRAFFIC SIGNAL OPERATION $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 PARK MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 STREET LIGHT MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 TRAIL MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 STORM DRAIN MAINTENANCE $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 TOTAL, PUBLIC WORKS COSTS $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 TOTAL, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000

LIBRARY
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 TOTAL, LIBRARY $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000

CITY DIRECT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 TOTAL, CITY DIRECT COSTS $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141 $0.141

CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 $0.000 NON-RESIDENTIAL $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 TOTAL, CITY GENERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 $0.009 SHADED CELLS ARE VARIABLE ASSUMPTIONS OR INPUTS UNIQUE TO THE PROJECT.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 285 of 1131 TABLE 7
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS DETAILED SUMMARY
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 % FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 OF TOTAL

ONGOING REVENUES

SECURED PROPERTY TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 82.85%

UNSECURED PROPERTY TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 8.29%

TRANSFER PROPERTY TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 1.14%

SALES TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

MEASURE 'I' SALES TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION SALES TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

FRANCHISE FEE REVENUES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 2.05%

BUSINESS LICENSE REVENUES
RESIDENTIAL NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

OTHER TAXES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

OTHER REVENUES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 3.23%

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

LIBRARY
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

POLICE DEPARTMENT
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

POLICE - ANIMAL CONTROL
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

POLICE - RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

POLICE - SENIOR SERVICES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
FIRE
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

PUBLIC WORKS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

INVESTMENT INCOME REVENUES
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 $1 2.44%
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $31 $31 $31 $31 $31 $31 $31 $31 $31 $31 100.00% TOTAL ON-GOING REVENUES $31 $31 $31 $31 $31 $31 $31 $31 $31 $31

ONGOING COSTS

POLICE DEPARTMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 47.39%

FIRE DEPARTMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 $3 52.45%

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT COST
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

GENERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.17%

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%

LIBRARY COSTS
RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
NON-RESIDENTIAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00%
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL COSTS $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0.00% TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL COSTS $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 100.00% TOTAL ON-GOING COSTS $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5 $5
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 ANNUAL NON-RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 TOTAL ANNUAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 $26 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ANNUAL NON-RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 TOTAL ANNUAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 286 of 1131 TABLE 8a
LAND USE SUMMARY:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY (Residential Only))
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029

ONGOING REVENUES
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000

ONGOING COSTS
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL COSTS $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 287 of 1131 TABLE 8b
LAND USE SUMMARY:

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY (Commercial Only)
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031

ONGOING REVENUES
TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653

ONGOING COSTS
TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL COSTS $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 ANNUAL NON-RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 ANNUAL NON-RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 288 of 1131 TABLE 8c
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SUMMARY (MIXED)
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 % FISCAL YEAR ($s x1,000) end of: 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 OF TOTAL

ONGOING REVENUES
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 0.00% TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL REVENUES $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 100.00% TOTAL ON-GOING REVENUES $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653 $30.9653

ONGOING COSTS
TOTAL RESIDENTIAL COSTS $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 0.00% TOTAL NON-RESIDENTIAL COSTS $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 100.00% TOTAL ON-GOING COSTS $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 $5.2894 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 $0.0000 ANNUAL NON-RESIDENTIAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 TOTAL ANNUAL ONGOING SURPLUS/(DEFICIT) $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 $25.6759 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ANNUAL NON-RESIDENTIAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 TOTAL ANNUAL REVENUE/COST RATIO 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 289 of 1131 TABLE 9
CITY OF REDLANDS : MODEL
SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION (SB 50)

FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Capacity Acreage SBE 50 fees
SFD 0.2260 SCHOOL DIST Elementary 600 10 $5,200
MFA 0.1362 Middle School 1000 20 $5,500
DEVELOPER FEE REVENUE PER SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED UNIT /1 $3,113 Mobile Home 0.1068 High School 2200 50 $7,200 DEVELOPER FEE REVENUE PER MULTI-FAMILY ATTACHED UNIT /2 $1,431 MIDDLE SCHOOL DEVELOPER FEE REVENUE PER MOBILE HOME /3 $1,212 SFD 0.1310 MFA 0.0574
Mobile Home 0.0548

HIGH SCHOOL
SFD 0.1690
MFA 0.0565
Mobile Home 0.0493
YEAR 1 YEAR 2 YEAR 3 YEAR 4 YEAR 5 YEAR 6 YEAR 7 YEAR 8 YEAR 9 YEAR 10 TOTAL FISCAL YEAR ($s ×1,000) end of: 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031

CITY OF REDLANDS

ANNUAL PROJECTED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
SFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MFA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mobile Home 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

STUDENT PROJECTIONS

ELEMENTARY
SFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MFA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mobile Home 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

MIDDLE SCHOOL
SFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MFA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mobile Home 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

HIGH SCHOOL
SFD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
MFA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mobile Home 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

ANNUAL SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION

ELEMENTARY
SFD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MFA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Mobile Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $0

MIDDLE SCHOOL
SFD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MFA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Mobile Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $0

HIGH SCHOOL
SFD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MFA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Mobile Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Total $0

TOTAL SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION
SFD $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
MFA $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Mobile Home $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTAL $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0

STUDENT GENERATION FACTORS

RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL FEE MITIGATION
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 290 of 1131 i

CITY OFREDLANDS

ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM

AND INITIAL STUDY

1. Project Title: GO-Store-It Self Storage (Conditional Use Permit No. 1168, Lot Merger No.0003, Ordinance Text Amendment No. 363, and Street Vacation No. 186)

2. Lead Agency Name and Address:

City of Redlands
Development Services Department
35 Cajon Street, Suite 20
Redlands, CA 92373

3. Contact Person and Phone Number:

Emily Elliott
Senior Associate, Contract Planner
(909) 798-7555

4. Project Location: The Project Site is located in the City of Redlands, San Bernardino County. The 6.34-acre property is located between Wabash and Jasper avenues on the south side of Naples Avenue. The Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) is 0298-051-07. The Project Site is in the eastern portion of the City of Redlands (see Figure 1 - Regional Location and Figure 2 - Project Vicinity).

5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address:

Madison Capital Group
450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 250
Newport Beach, CA 92660

6. General Plan Designation: Commercial

7. Zoning: C-4 (Highway Commercial)

8. Project Description: Madison Capital Group (Project Applicant) is requesting approval from the City of Redlands for a Conditional Use Permit, Lot Merger, Ordinance Text Amendment, and Street Vacation to develop a 6.34-acre parcel, into a self-storage facility with a 700-square-foot leasing office and 11 buildings to include 835 units (see Figure 3 – Site Plan). The Proposed Project is known as GO-Store-It.

The Project Site is generally flat, gently sloping from east to west with an elevation of approximately 1,630 feet above mean sea level (amsl) in the western portion to 1,614 feet amsl in the eastern portion. The Project Site is vacant and contains ruderal vegetation.

Disturbance of the site has occurred from vehicles, discing, and trash dumping.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 291 of 1131 ii
The Project Site is currently zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial) and designated in the City of Redlands 2035 General Plan (General Plan) for Commercial uses. The Project Application includes an Ordinance Text Amendment to add "Self-storage with a minimum of 5 acres or more" as a use that requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the C-4 District. The Proposed Project includes a Street vacation to vacate 3 feet on Jasper Avenue. The Lot Merger is required to merge the four lots comprising the Project Site into one.

Access to the Project Site would be provided by two proposed driveways; one from Jasper Avenue and one from Wabash Avenue; entries to the storage units would be gated.

9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The Project Site is located in a developed area of the city with residential, commercial, and light industrial uses. Adjacent property uses and land use designations are shown below in the table below.

Existing Land Use and General Plan Designation
Location
Existing
Land Use General Plan Designation Zoning
Project Site Vacant &
Undeveloped
Commercial C-4 (Highway Commercial)
North Commercial
(restaurant);
Residential
Commercial; Commercial
(County)
C-4 (Highway Commercial);
General Commercial-Sign
Control Primary (CG-SCp)
(County)
South RV Storage
Facility
Light Industrial M-1 (Light Industrial)
East RV Storage
Facility
Light Industrial; Commercial
(County)
M-1 (Light Industrial);
General Commercial-Sign
Control Primary (CG-SCp)
(County)
West Residential and
Commercial
Shopping Center
Low Density Residential and
Commercial
R-1 (Single-Family
Residential) and C-4
(Highway Commercial)
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 292 of 1131

REGIONAL LOCATION

LILBURN
C O R P O R A T I O N FIGURE 1
Source: Lilburn Corp., August, 2022.

Mile
0 0.5

PROJECT SITE
GOStoreIt Self Storage
City of Redlands, California
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 293 of 1131

LILBURN

C O R P O R A T I O N
Source: Lilburn Corp., August, 2022.

Feet
0 275 PROJECT VICINITY
FIGURE 2
GOStoreIt Self Storage
City of Redlands, California
PROJECT SITE Naples Avenue
Wabash Avenue
Jasper Avenue
Nice Avenue
Mentone Blvd
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 294 of 1131

LILBURN

C O R P O R A T I O N

SITE PLAN
FIGURE 3
GOStoreIt Self Storage
City of Redlands, California
5 10x20
10x20
10x17
26'-0"
26'-0"
26'-0" 26'-0"
26'-0"
30'-0"

ENTRY GATE
30'-0"

NAPLES AVENUE

WABASH AVENUEJASPER AVENUE
63'-10"

SETBACK
16'-1"

OVERSIZE UNITS OVERSIZE UNITS

OVERSIZE UNITS OVERSIZE UNITS
BLDG. A
BLDG. B
BLDG. J
BLDG. K

LEASING
OFFICE
700 S.F.
6,000 SF
20,736 SF
6,600 SF
4,980 SF
22,335 SF BLDG. H
3,350 SF
10x17
10x10 10x15
10x10 10x15 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5
10x20 10x2010x20 10x2010x20 10x2010x20 10x2010x20 10x20 BLDG. C
10,680 SF
BLDG. D
14,025 SF
BLDG. E
9,345 SF
BLDG. F
14,025 SF
BLDG. G
10,680 SF
BLDG. I
26'-2" 25'-2" 25'-2" 25'-2" 25'-2" 25'-2"
25'-2"
26'-2"
30'-0"
20'-0"
35'-0" 9'-0"18'-0"
8' HIGH FENCE
TYP.
8' HIGH FENCE
TYP.
8' HIGH FENCE
TYP.
10x20
10x30
12x20
10x30
10x30
10x30
10x30
10x30
10x30
10x30
10x30
10x30
10x30
10x30
12x30
12x30
12x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20
10x30
12x2012x2012x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20
10x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x15
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x2012x20
10x30
10x30
10x30
10x30
12x20
12x30
10x1510x15
10x15 10x10
10x15 10x1010x15 10x1010x15 10x1010x15 10x1010x15 10x1010x15 10x10 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5
10x20
10x20
5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5
10x20
10x20
10x20
10x10 10x10 10x10 10x10 10x10
10x2510x2510x2510x2510x25
10x2510x2510x2510x25
10x15
5x5 5x5 10x10 10x10
12x2510x2510x2510x25
10x25
10x25
10x25
10x25
10x25
5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5
10x2010x20
10x2010x2010x2010x2010x20 10x15 10x10
10x15 10x10
10x15 10x10
10x20
12x20
10x15 10x1010x15 10x10
10x15 10x10
12x20
10x20
5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 10x20 10x20
15x20
10x20
15x20
10x20
10x15 10x1010x15 10x10
10x510x510x510x5
10x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x510x5
5x5
5x5
5x5
5x5
5x5
5x5
5x5
5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 10x15
10x10
10x15
10x10
10x3010x3010x3010x3010x30
10x30
10x15
10x10
10x15
10x10
10x10 10x1010x10 10x10 10x20
10x20
10x20
10x20
5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5
10x20
10x20
10x20
10x20
5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5
10x20
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x1510x15
12x2512x25
5x5
5x5
5x5
5x5
5x5
12x25
12x25
12x25
10x25
10x2510x25
5x15
5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 10x20
5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 10x12
10x12
10x12
5x7 5x7 5x7 5x7
5x5
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x5 10x5 10x5 10x5 10x5
10x25
10x25
10x25
10x25
10x25
10x5 10x5 10x5 10x5 10x5
10x15 10x15
10x15 10x15
10x15 10x15
10x15 10x15
10x5
10x15
10x5
10x15
10x5
10x15
10x5
10x15
10x25
10x25
10x25
10x5 10x5 10x5
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x5 10x5 10x5
5x5
5x55x55x55x55x55x55x55x55x5
10x20 10x10
10x20 10x10
10x20 10x10
10x20 10x10
10x20 10x10
10x10 10x10
10x10 10x10
10x10 10x10
10x10 10x10 5x5 5x5
10x15
5x5 5x5
10x15
5x5 5x5
10x15
10x5
10x5 10x20
10x5
10x5 10x20
10x5
10x5 10x20
10x5
10x5 10x20
10x20 10x10
10x20 10x10
10x20 10x10
10x10 10x10
10x10 10x10
10x10 10x10 5x5 5x5
10x15
5x5 5x5
10x15
5x5
5x55x55x55x55x55x55x55x55x5
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x7 10x7 10x7 10x7
10x20
10x20
10x20
10x20
10x20
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x30
5x5 5x5
10x30
5x5 5x5
10x30
5x5 5x5
10x30
5x5 5x5
10x30
5x5 5x5
10x30
5x5 5x5
10x20
10x20
10x20
10x20
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x20
10x20
10x20
10x20
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x20
10x20
10x20
10x20
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x20
10x20
10x15
10x15
10x20 10x15
10x7 10x7 7x15
10x15 10x10 10x10 10x15 5x5
10x20
5x5 5x5
10x20
5x5 5x5
10x20
5x5 5x5
10x20
5x5 5x5
10x20
5x5
10x10 10x15
10x10 10x15
10x10 10x15
10x10 10x15
10x10 10x15
5x55x55x55x55x55x55x55x55x55x5
10x20
5x5 5x5
10x20
5x5 5x5
10x20
5x5 5x5
10x15 10x10 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 10x5
10x20
10x5
10x20
10x5
10x20
10x5
10x20
10x10 10x15
10x10 10x15
10x10 10x15
10x10 10x15
10x10 10x15 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 5x5 10x5
10x20
10x5
10x20
10x5
10x20
10x5
10x20
10x15 10x10 10x10 10x15
10x15 10x10 10x10 10x15
10x15 10x10 10x10 10x15
10x15 10x10 10x10 10x15 10x5
10x20
10x5
10x20
10x5
10x20
10x5
10x20
10x15 10x10
10x15 10x10
10x15 10x10
10x15 10x10
10x20
5x5 5x5
5x55x55x55x55x55x55x55x55x55x5
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x20 10x20
10x7 10x7 10x7 10x7
10x15 10x10 10x2010x15 10x10 10x2010x15 10x10 10x2010x15 10x10 10x2010x15 10x10 10x20 10x2510x2510x2510x25
10x15 10x10 10x15 10x1010x15 10x10 10x15 10x1010x15 10x10 10x15 10x1010x15 10x10 10x15 10x10 10x2510x15 10x10 10x15 10x10 10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
10x15
44'-0"
30'-0"
15'

SETBACK
30'-0"
33'-2"

SETBACK
30'-0"
10x20 10x20
10x20
10x20
26'-11
1 4"
31'-11"
19'-11"
45'-21
2"
50'-21
2"
45'-2"
65'-21
4"
EXIST. P.L.

PROP. P.L.

EXIST. P.L.

PROP. P.L.

EXIST. P.L.

NEW SIDEWALK

NEW CURB/GUTTER

NEW CURB/GUTTER
BIKE RACK (MIN.
3 CAPACITY)
NEW HYDRANT (TYP.)
NEW

HYDRANT
(TYP.)
(E) HYDRANT
7' HIGH ENTRY GATE

OVERSIZE UNITS
12x2012x2012x20

KNOX BOX
TRASH ENCL.
10x2010x20
XFMR

FIRE BACKFLOW
6'
(E) HYDRANT
(E) HYDRANT (E) HYDRANT
(E) HYDRANT

RETAINING WALL
- 2'-0" HIGH MAX.
26'-11"
NOTE: This information is conceptual in nature and is subject to adjustments pending further verication and Client, Tenant, and Governmental Agency approvals. No warranties or guaranties of any kind are given or implied by the Architect.

DATE:

MCG JOB #:

DATE REVISIONS

REDLANDS, CA
N
21627.01
03-28-2022
C MCG ARCHITECTURE 2021 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
0 SITE PLAN
Scheme A
Scale : 1" = 40'
20' 40' 80'

BUILDING SF

BUILDING A

BUILDING B

BUILDING C

BUILDING D

BUILDING E
22,335 SF

SF PER BUIDLING UNIT COUNT

SIZE QTY RENTABLE TYPE
TOTAL
5 X 5 170 4,250 SF
835
#
1 2
3 4
X 4 CC
CC
6,600 SF
10,680 SF
14,025 SF
9,345 SF

AVERAGE UNIT SIZE
TOTAL
5 #UNITS
5 7
5 6
7 10 X 15 25 3,750 SF CC
114,780 SF 835

RENTABLE SF
137
9 5

REGULAR PARKING
10 140 SF
8 11
12 10 X 10 87 8,700 SF CC
TOTAL 123,456 SF

BUILDING F

BUILDING G
14,025 SF
10,680 SF

LOCATION MAP
N
BUILDING H 3,350 SF
BUILDING I 4,980 SF
BUILDING J 6,000 SF
13 14
15 16
5 X 15 1 75 SF CC
17 114,780 SF
10 X 10
10 X 15 DU
DU
10 X 20 DU
10 X 25 DU
10 X 30 8,700 SF DU
52,600 SF
8,250 SF
10 X 5 DU
5 X 5 DU
10 X 17 DU
12 X 20 2,880 SF DU
12 X 25 1,800 SF DU
12 X 30 1,080 SF DU
15 X 20 600 SF DU
10 X 12 3 360 SF CC
10 X 5 40 2,000 SF CC
SUB TOTAL: 330
18 19,275 SF CC
12 13
7 300 SF
650 SF
700 SF
112 16,800 SF
19 2
263
33 29
12 6
3 2
340 SF
SUB TOTAL: 505 95,505 SF DU
CC/DU
BUILDING K 20,736 SF
20 21
7 X 10 10 700 SF DU
7 X 15 1 105 SF DU

SITE SUMMARY
TOTAL SITE AREA:

PARKING PROVIDED : 5 STALLS
BUILDING COVERAGE: 123,456 SF - 44.7%
BUILDING: 123,456 SF
PAVED AREA:

ZONING C-4 (COMMERCIAL)
95,396 SF - 34.7%
LANDSCAPE AREA: 56,982 SF - 20.6%

OWNER - MADISON CAPITAL GROUP
Contact: Dave Bird, Senior VP Construction and Development 450 Newport Center Drive, Suite 250
Newport Beach, CA 92660
c 909.215.4650

CLEVELAND
DENVER

GLENDORA
IRVINE

ORLANDO

PHOENIX

SAN FRANCISCO
LEASING OFFICE 700 SF
PARKING REQUIRED : 700 SF OFFICE/250 = 3 (4 MIN. REQ'D.) OFFICE AREA (INCL. IN BLDG./COVERAGE AREA) 700 SF

3.14.22 REV. PER INITIAL CITY COMMENTS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: 0298-051-07
SITE FAR: ± .45/1
NET +/- 276,228 SF ± 6.34 AC 7.54 AC GROSS

05.05.22 REVISED PER CITY COMMENTS
1 1
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 295 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Project Description
6 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required:

Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region

11. Related Technical Reports (incorporated by reference): The technical studies/reports referenced herein and listed in the References section at the end of this Initial Study have been used to analyze the project. All reports are available for review at City of Redlands Development Services Department.

12. Evaluation Format: This Initial Study is prepared in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. This format of the study is presented as follows. The project is evaluated based upon its effect on twenty (20) major categories of environmental factors. Each factor is reviewed by responding to a series of questions regarding the impact of the project on each element of the overall factor. The Initial Study Checklist provides a formatted analysis that provides a determination of the effect of the project on the factor and its elements. The effect of the project is categorized into one of the following four categories of possible determinations.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than Significant
with Mitigation
Less than Significant No Impact
Substantiation is then provided to justify each determination. One of the four following conclusions is then provided as a summary of the analysis for each of the major environmental factors.

1. Therefore, no impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

2. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

3. Possible significant adverse impacts have been identified or anticipated and the following mitigation measures are required as a condition of project approval to reduce these impacts to a level below significant. The required mitigation measures are: (List mitigation measures).

4. Significant adverse impacts have been identified or anticipated. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is required to evaluate these impacts, which are: (List the impacts requiring analysis within the EIR).

At the end of the analysis the required mitigation measures are restated and categorized as being either self- monitoring or as requiring a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 296 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 297 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 8 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
I. AESTHETICS – Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are
experienced from publicly accessible vantage point). If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing
scenic quality?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? a) Less Than Significant. Scenic vistas in the General Plan Planning Area consist of the scenic corridors and views to and from the open spaces, canyonlands, hillsides, groves, and the San Bernardino Mountains.1 The general area provides views of the San Bernardino mountains. The Project Site is located in a developed area of the city with residential, commercial, and light industrial uses. The proposed structures would range from 12 feet to 14 feet. Therefore, the Proposed Project is not anticipated to affect a scenic vista. No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
b) No Impact. The Project Site is heavily disturbed and contains ruderal vegetation.2 No scenic resources are located at the Project Site. The nearest State Scenic highway is Lugonia Avenue/SR-38,3located approximately 500 feet north of the Project Site. The land between the Project Site and Lugonia Avenue is completely developed with residential and commercial uses. Therefore, implementation of the Proposed Project would not substantially degrade scenic resources within a state scenic highway. No impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. c) Less than Significant. As stated above, the Project Site is heavily disturbed and contains ruderal vegetation. The Proposed Project proposes to develop the Project Site as a self1 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. 2 Site Visit conducted on July 16, 2022.
3 San Bernardino County. Policy Plan web maps. NR-3 “Scenic Routes & Highways.” Accessed March 29, 2022.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 298 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 9 storage facility. It would provide approximately 56,982 SF of landscaping (20.6% of the property). Therefore, the general aesthetics of the site would change, however, the proposed changes would be beneficial. Moreover, it is located in a developed area that consists of residential, commercial, and light industrial uses. The Project Site is currently zoned C-4 (Highway Commercial) and designated in the General Plan for Commercial uses. The Proposed Project requires an Ordinance Text Amendment but would comply with the development standards required for the C-4 zone. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. d) Less than Significant. The Proposed Project would not generate a significant amount of light and glare when compared to the surrounding area, which includes streetlights and existing land uses. The Project Site is surrounded on all sides by development: residential and commercial uses to the north, RV storage facility to the south, an RV storage facility to the east, and residences and commercial shopping center to the west. The design and placement of light fixtures for the Proposed Project would be reviewed for consistency with City standards and subject to City approval. City Standards require shielding, diffusing, or indirect lighting to avoid glare. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or
Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural
use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract?
c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 299 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 10 section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public
Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned
Timberland Production (as defined by Government
Code section 51104 (g))?
d) Result in loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
e) Involve other changes in the existing environment
which, due to their location or nature, could result
in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use
or conversion of forest land to non-forest use?
a) No Impact. The Project Site is identified as “Grazing Land.”4 Grazing Land is land which the existing vegetation is suited to the grazing of livestock. It is not identified as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Furthermore, the Project Site is surrounded by lands classified as Urban and Built-Up land.5 Therefore, no impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. b) No Impact. The Project Site is currently zoned Highway Commercial (C-4). It is not zoned for agricultural uses. In addition, the Project Site is not enrolled in a Williamson Act contract.6Implementation of the Proposed Project would not interfere with such a contract.

Therefore, no impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
c) No Impact. The Project Site has a land use designation of Commercial and is currently zoned C-4. The Proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g), timberland.

The Project Site does not contain forestland Therefore, no impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
d) No impact. The Project Site does not support, nor is it near any forest land. Therefore, implementation of the Proposed Project would not convert forest land to non-forest use.

No impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. e) No Impact. The Project Site does not support agricultural or forest land uses that would be lost as a result of the Proposed Project implementation. There are no such land uses in the vicinity. Therefore, no impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
4 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.2- 1: Farmland Classifications.
5 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.2- 1: Farmland Classifications.
6 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.2- 1: Farmland Classifications.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 300 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 11 III. AIR QUALITY
Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation.

Less than
Significant
No
Impact
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
applicable air quality plan?
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase
of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is non-attainment under an applicable
federal or state ambient air quality standard?
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to
odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of
people?
a) Less than Significant. The Project Site is located in the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB).

The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has jurisdiction over air quality issues and regulations within the SCAB. The Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the SCAB establishes a program of rules and regulations administered by the SCAQMD to obtain attainment of the state and federal ambient air quality standards. The most recent AQMP (AQMP 2016) was adopted by the SCAQMD on March 3, 2017. The 2016 AQMP incorporates the latest scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including transportation control measures developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) from the 2016 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, and updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories. Consistency with the AQMP 2016 for general development projects is determined by demonstrating compliance with local land use plans and/or employment projections.

The Proposed Project is consistent with the City of Redlands 2035 General Plan designation of Commercial and would therefore be consistent with the land uses assumed in the adopted General Plan growth forecasts which are used in development of the AQMP.

The emissions associated with the Proposed Project would not result in a conflict or obstruction to the implementation of the AQMP. Therefore, project emissions are within the amounts already accounted for in the AQMP and no significant inconsistency with the Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 301 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 12 AQMP would occur. The impact would be less than significant, and no mitigation measures are required.
b) Less than Significant. The California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) recommended by the SCAQMD for all general development projects within the South Coast Air Basin. Therefore, the Proposed Project’s construction and operational emissions were estimated using CalEEMod version 2022.1 (Appendix A). The criteria pollutants estimated for include: reactive organic gases (ROG), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and fugitive particulates (PM10 and PM2.5). Two of the analyzed pollutants, ROG and NOx, are ozone precursors. Both summer and winter season emission levels were estimated.

Construction Emissions
Construction emissions are considered short-term, temporary emissions and were modeled with the following construction parameters: demolition (no buildings on-site, site preparation, site grading (fine and mass grading), building construction, paving, and architectural coating. Construction is anticipated to begin in the beginning of 2023 and be completed in 2024. The resulting emissions generated by construction of the Proposed Project are shown in Table 1 and Table 2, which represent summer and winter construction emissions, respectively.

Table 1
Maximum Summer Construction Emissions
(Pounds per Day)
Source/Phase ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
2023 2.1 20.1 22.4 0.0 3.9 2.3
2024 60.0 0.9 1.2 0.0 0.3 0.1
SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Significant No No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod.2022.1 Summer Emissions.

Phases do not overlap and represent the highest concentration.

Table 2
Maximum Winter Construction Emissions
(Pounds per Day)
Source/Phase ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
2023 4.0 40.0 36.7 0.1 9.7 5.7
2024 1.2 11.2 13.1 0.0 1.9 0.8
SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
Significant No No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod.2022.1 Winter Emissions.

Phases do not overlap and represent the highest concentration.

As shown in Table 1 and Table 2, construction emissions during either summer or winter seasonal conditions would not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds. Although the Proposed Project does not exceed SCAQMD thresholds for construction emissions, the Project Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 302 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 13 Proponent would be required to comply with all applicable SCAQMD rules and regulations as the SCAB is in non-attainment status for ozone and suspended particulates (PM10 and PM2.5). The estimated emissions incorporate Rule 403 by default as required during construction.

Operational Emissions
The operational mobile emissions were calculated using CalEEMod with the vehicle trip generation estimates from the Traffic Circulation & VMT Impact Assessment, dated August 9, 2022, prepared for the Proposed Project by Linscott Law & Greenspan. It was determined that the Proposed Project would generate approximately 189 total daily trips.

The Proposed Project’s long-term operational emissions have been calculated and are summarized below in Table 3 and Table 4.

Table 3
Summer Operational Emissions Summary
(Pounds per Day)
Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Mobile 0.9 0.9 8.7 0.0 0.7 0.1
Area 4.5 0.1 9.5 0.0 0.0 0.0
Energy 0.1 0.9 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.1
Totals 5.4 1.9 19.0 0.0 0.8 0.2
SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Significant No No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod.2022.1 Summer Emissions.

Emissions represent the daily maximum emissions.

Table 4
Winter Operational Emissions Summary
(Pounds per Day)
Source ROG NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5
Mobile 0.8 1.0 7.2 0.0 0.7 0.1
Area 3.0 -- -- -- -- --
Energy 0.1 0.9 0.8 0.0 0.1 0.1
Totals 3.8 1.9 7.9 0.0 0.8 0.2
SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55
Significant No No No No No No
Source: CalEEMod.2022.1 Winter Emissions.

Emissions represent the daily maximum emissions.

As shown, both summer and winter season operational emissions are below SCAQMD thresholds. The Proposed Project does not exceed applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds either during construction or operational activities. The Proposed Project would not violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 303 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 14 c) Less than Significant. For the purposes of a CEQA analysis, the SCAQMD considers a sensitive receptor to be a receptor such as a residence, hospital, convalescent facility or anywhere that it is possible for an individual to remain for 24 hours. Additionally, schools, playgrounds, childcare centers, and athletic facilities can also be considered as sensitive receptors. The use of LSTs is voluntary, to be implemented at the discretion of local public agencies acting as a lead agency pursuant to CEQA. According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply if the Proposed Project includes stationary sources or attracts mobile sources (such as heavy-duty trucks) that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site; such as industrial warehouse/transfer facilities. The LSTs were developed to analyze the significance of potential air quality impacts of Proposed Projects to sensitive receptors (i.e. schools, single family residences, etc.) and provide screening tables for small projects (one, two, or five acres). Projects are evaluated based on geographic location and distance from the sensitive receptor (25, 50, 100, 200, or 500 meters from the site).

The Project Site is approximately 6.34 acres and therefore the “five-acre” LSTs were utilized for the analysis and represents a worst-case scenario as the larger the site, the larger the screening threshold. The nearest sensitive receptor is the residential development located 26 feet (~8 meters) north of the Project Site; therefore, LSTs are based on a 25-meter distance.

Table 5
Localized Significance Thresholds
(Pounds Per Day)
Source NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Construction Emissions
(Max. from Table 1 and Table 2) 40.0 36.7 9.7 5.7
Operational Emissions
(Max. total from Table 3 and Table 4) 1.9 19.0 0.8 0.2
Highest Value (lbs/day) 40.0 36.7 9.7 0.8 5.7 0.2
LST 270 2,075 14*4
†
9 *
3 †
Greater Than Threshold No No No No No No
Note: PM10 and PM2.5 emissions are separated into construction and operational thresholds in accordance with the SCAQMD Mass Rate LST Look-up Tables.
* Construction emissions LST
† Operational emissions LST
Source: CalEEMod.2022.1 Summer & Winter Emissions; SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology; SCAQMD Mass Rate Look-up Tables for five-acre site in Source Receptor Area No. 35, distance of 25 meters.

As shown in Table 5, the Proposed Project’s emissions are not anticipated to exceed the thresholds for LSTs. Therefore, the Proposed Project is not anticipated to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no additional mitigation measures are required. d) Less than Significant. The Proposed Project does not contain land uses typically associated with the emission of objectionable odors. Potential odor sources associated with Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 304 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 15 the Proposed Project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts resulting from construction activity. It should be noted that any construction odor emissions generated would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction activity. Project-generated refuse would be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City of Redlands’s solid waste regulations. The Project would be also required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Have substantial adverse effects, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive or special
status species in local or regional plans, policies,
or regulations, or by the California Department of
Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified in local or regional plans, policies, and
regulations or by the California Department of
Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on state or
federally protected wetlands (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interruption, or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife
species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of
native wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 305 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 16 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional or state habitat conservation plan?
a) Less than Significant with Mitigation. A Biological Technical report was prepared in June 2022 for the Proposed Project by ECORP Consulting, Inc. (ECORP) and is summarized herein (Appendix B for report). The survey was conducted to identify any potential biological resources that could be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to CEQA, and to identify any biological constraints that would affect the Proposed Project.

Prior to conducting the biological reconnaissance survey, ECORP biologists performed a literature review using the CDFW’s California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; CDFW 2022a) and the California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS) Electronic Inventory (CNPSEI; CNPS 2022) to determine the special-status plant and wildlife species that have been documented near the Project Site. ECORP searched CNDDB and CNPSEI records within the Project Site boundaries as depicted on USGS 7.5-minute Redlands topographic quadrangle, plus the surrounding eight topographic quadrangles. The CNDDB and CNPSEI contain records of reported occurrences of federally and/or state-listed endangered, threatened, proposed endangered or threatened species, California Species of Special Concern (SSC), or other special status species or habitat that may occur within or near the Project Site.

The Project Site consists of disturbed land and is largely devoid of native vegetation.

Vegetation communities onsite consisted primarily of disturbed ruderal grassland.

Disturbances observed on the site were mainly associated with non-native species, vehicle tracks, and scattered trash. The literature review and database searches identified 32 special-status plant species that have been documented in the vicinity of the Project Site.

All 32 special-status plant species were presumed to be absent due to the lack of suitable habitat. The removal of vegetation on the Project Site will not contribute to the overall decline of any of the special-status plant species. No significant impacts to special-status plant species are anticipated to result from the development of this Project.

Of the 49 special-status wildlife species identified in the literature review and database searches, one was found to have a low potential to occur onsite: burrowing owl. Burrowing owls are a CDFW SSC and are also protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game Code. During the field survey, no suitable burrows or burrow-like structures were observed on or adjacent to the Project Site. The site contained marginally suitable burrowing owl habitat consisting of low-growing ruderal grassland habitat and friable, sandy loam soils. The literature review and database search identified one historical record from 1983 within 5 miles of the Project Site. The Project Site did not appear to have been currently or recently used by burrowing owl at the time of the survey; however, the species is mobile and if the conditions were to change on the Project Site, such as if burrows or burrow-like structures are incidentally created or formed, burrowing owl could take up residence on the Project Site. In addition, due to the mobile nature of the Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 306 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 17 species, it is possible that burrowing owl could use the site prior to the start of project activities, especially if burrows or burrow-like structures are incidentally created or formed prior to the start of construction. If burrowing owl are found to be using or nesting on the Project Site prior to the start of construction, direct impacts may occur in the form of mortality or injury in the form of ground disturbance, entombment, and vegetation removal.

Indirect impacts from construction noise, increased human and vehicular activity, dust, habitat loss, and ground vibrations may occur. To avoid potentially significant impacts to burrowing owl, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 shall be implemented.

The remaining 48 special-status wildlife species are presumed to be absent from the property and adjacent land due to the lack of suitable habitat; proximity to the surrounding residential, commercial, and industrial development; and the presence of anthropogenic disturbances associated with the commercial and industrial development surrounding the site. No significant impacts to the 48 special-status wildlife species are anticipated to result from the development of the Proposed Project. The Peruvian pepper tree observed on the Project Site as well as the trees immediately adjacent to the Project Site could provide nesting habitat for nesting birds and raptors protected by the MBTA and California Fish and Game Code. Furthermore, the Project Site could provide nesting habitat for groundnesting bird species. If construction of the Proposed Project occurs during the bird breeding season (typically February 1 through August 31), ground-disturbing construction activities could directly affect birds protected by the MBTA and their nests through the removal of habitat on the Project Site, and indirectly through increased noise, vibrations, and increased human activity. Therefore, Mitigation Measure BIO-2 shall be implemented to avoid any significant impacts to nesting birds.

Mitigation Measure BIO-1:

Preconstruction Burrowing Owl Surveys - Preconstruction surveys for burrowing owl shall be conducted. The surveys shall follow the methods described in the CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG] 2012). Two surveys shall be conducted, with the first survey being scheduled between 30 and 14 days before initial ground disturbance (grading, grubbing, and construction), and the second survey being conducted no more than 24 hours prior to initial ground disturbance. If burrowing owls and/or suitable burrowing owl burrows are identified on the Project Site during the survey, the Project Proponent shall consult with CDFW and follow the methods listed in the CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012) for avoidance and/or passive relocation. If burrowing owls or suitable burrowing owl burrows with sign (e.g., whitewash, pellets, feathers, prey remains) are identified on the Project Site during the survey, these features must be completely avoided. If impacts to those features are unavoidable, then the Project Proponent must also develop an owl mitigation plan in consultation with CDFW.

Mitigation methods may include passive relocation conducted outside of the owl breeding season (between September 1 and February 28). If an active owl burrow is identified, and construction is to proceed, then a qualified biologist (with two or more years of burrowing owl experience) can establish an appropriate disturbance-limit buffer around the burrow using flagging or staking. Construction activities shall not Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 307 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 18 occur within any buffer zones until the burrow is deemed inactive by the qualified biologist.

Mitigation Measure BIO-2:

Preconstruction Nesting Bird Survey - If construction or other Project activities are scheduled to occur during the nesting bird season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified avian biologist to ensure that active bird nests will not be disturbed or destroyed. The survey shall be completed no more than three days prior to initial ground disturbance. The nesting bird survey shall include the Project Site and adjacent areas where Project activities have the potential to affect active nests, either directly or indirectly, due to construction activity, noise, human activity, or ground disturbance. If an active nest is identified, a qualified avian biologist shall establish an appropriately sized non-disturbance buffer around the nest using flagging or staking. Construction activities shall not occur within any non-disturbance buffer zones until the nest is deemed inactive by the qualified avian biologist. If initial ground-disturbing activities are scheduled to occur during the nesting bird season, then a biological monitor shall be present during all vegetation removal activities to ensure no impacts to nesting birds occur.

Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2 would ensure that potential impacts to candidate, sensitive or special status species are avoided by the project. b) No Impact. The Project Site consists of disturbed land that supports mostly non-native ruderal vegetation species. As stated in Biological Technical Report, the Project Site does not contain any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities that would need to be preserved. No impacts to sensitive natural communities are anticipated to result from the development of Proposed Project. No impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
c) No Impact. Jurisdictional waters and wetlands include waters of the U.S., including wetlands regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) pursuant to the Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404; waters of the State regulated by the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) pursuant to Section 401 of the CWA and State Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act; and/or streambed and riparian habitat regulated by the CDFW pursuant to Sections 1600 et seq. of the CFG Code. The desktop review of the NRCS identified one hydric soil type on the site: Tujunga Gravelly Loamy Sand, 0 to 9 percent slopes. However, the National Wetland Inventory, National Hydrography Products, and USGS desktop map review did not identify any aquatic features within the Project Site.

According to the results of the preliminary aquatic resources delineation, no state or federally protected wetlands or Waters of the U.S. were identified on the Project Site.

Potential waters of the U.S., waters of the State, and CDFW jurisdictional habitat are not present within the Project Site. Therefore, no impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 308 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 19 d) Less than Significant. Wildlife movement and the fragmentation of wildlife habitat are recognized as critical issues that must be considered in assessing impacts to wildlife.

Habitat fragmentation is the division or breaking up of larger habitat areas into smaller areas that may or may not be capable of independently sustaining wildlife and plant populations. Habitat linkages provide connections between larger habitat areas that are separated by development. Wildlife corridors are similar to linkages but provide specific opportunities for animals to disperse or migrate between areas.

The Project Site is located within and adjacent to areas containing existing disturbances (e.g., paved roads and residential, commercial, and industrial development). The Project Site is disturbed and contains insufficient vegetative cover to facilitate wildlife movement and it is isolated from large, contiguous blocks of native habitat. No migratory wildlife corridors or native wildlife nursery sites were identified within the Project site. No impacts to these resources are expected to occur during the development of the Proposed Project.

No significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
e) Less than Significant. Measure U is an adopted ballot measure that has been incorporated into the General Plan. In accordance with Measure U, the General Plan limits development potential in the Resource Preservation land use category in the eastern and southern canyon portions of the General Plan Planning Area.7 The Project Site is not designated for Resource Conservation and the Project Site is not located in the canyons. The General Plan requires that new development take actions to protect biological resources. As summarized above, the Proposed Project would not result in any significant impacts to biological resources with implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2.

In addition, as a regulatory requirement, the project construction contractor would be required to prepare and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that would include standard construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) and other measures to ensure appropriate site protections are in place during construction to prevent potential adverse effects on water quality and related resources. Implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and BIO-2, the project’s SWPPP, and construction and operation BMPs would ensure that the Proposed Project would not conflict with the General Plan policies for biological resources. No significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no additional mitigation measures are required. f) No Impact. The Project Site is not located within the boundaries of any adopted conservation plan. Therefore, no impact on any adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved habitat conservation plan would occur.

No impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 7 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 309 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 20 V. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of a historical resource pursuant to
§15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the
significance of an archaeological resource
pursuant to §15064.5?
c) Disturb any human remains, including those
interred outside of formal cemeteries?
a) Less than Significant with Mitigation. A Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report was prepared for the Project Site in June 2022 by ECORP (see Appendix C for report). ECORP requested a records search for the property at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) of the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) at California State University, Fullerton. ECORP received the results of the records search of the CHRIS from the SCCIC on February 4, 2022. Twenty-six previous cultural resource investigations have been conducted within 1 mile of the property, covering approximately 10 percent of the total area surrounding the property within the record search radius. The previous studies were conducted between 1976 and 2010. The results of the records search indicate that none of the property has been previously surveyed for cultural resources. The records search determined that a total of 54 cultural resources were previously recorded within 1 mile of the Project Site: 51 historic-period cultural resources and three pre-contact cultural resources. One of the historic-period resources overlaps the Project Site.

As a result of the field survey, ECORP updated one previously recorded resource (P-36- 012351) within the Project Site and identified and recorded one new cultural resource (MW-001). These resources comprise an irrigation feature and a concrete pad, respectively.

These resources were likely constructed and used when the Project Site was an active agricultural field. Significant cultural resources must meet at least one criteria that define eligibility for listing on either the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) or the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). ECORP archaeologists have evaluated these resources as not eligible using NRHP and CRHR eligibility criteria, and not eligible for listing in the NRHP or CRHR under any criteria. Therefore, these finds are not considered Historical Resources under CEQA.

The Built Environment Resources Directory for San Bernardino County lists three properties within 1 mile of the Project Site that were determined to be ineligible for the NRHP.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 310 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 21 There always remains the potential for ground-disturbing activities to expose previously unrecorded cultural resources. Therefore, the Mitigation Measure CR-1 shall be implemented to avoid potential significant impacts to historical resources:

Mitigation Measure CR-1:

If subsurface deposits believed to be cultural or human in origin are discovered during construction, all work must halt within a 100-foot radius of the discovery. A qualified professional archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for precontact and historic archaeologist, shall be retained to evaluate the significance of the find, and shall have the authority to modify the no-work radius as appropriate, using professional judgment. The following notifications shall apply, depending on the nature of the find:
• If the professional archaeologist determines that the find does not represent a cultural resource, work may resume immediately, and no agency notifications are required.
• If the professional archaeologist determines that the find does represent a cultural resource from any time period or cultural affiliation, the archaeologist shall immediately notify the lead federal agency, the lead CEQA agency, and applicable landowner. The agencies shall consult on a finding of eligibility and implement appropriate treatment measures, if the find is determined to be a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines or a Historic Property under Section 106 NHPA, if applicable. Work may not resume within the no-work radius until the lead agencies, through consultation as appropriate, determine that the site either: 1) is not a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines or a Historic Property under Section 106; or 2) that the treatment measures have been completed to their satisfaction. • The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within TCR-1 below, regarding any pre-contact and/or historic-era finds and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. • If significant pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within TCR-1. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly.
b) Less than Significant with Mitigation. The Project Site contains Holocene alluvial deposits contemporaneous with human occupation of the region. Although ECORP archaeologists did not identify pre-contact resources during the field survey; however, there exists a moderate potential for buried pre-contact archaeological sites within the Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 311 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 22 Project Site due to the presence of Holocene alluvial deposits within the Project Site, the proximity of the Project Site to the Santa Ana River, and the presence of previously recorded pre-contact cultural resources within 1 mile of the Project Site. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CR-1 as described above, the Proposed Project would not result in potentially significant impacts to archaeological resources. c) Less than Significant with Mitigation. The discovery of human remains is always a possibility during ground-disturbing activities. Therefore, possible significant adverse impacts have been identified or anticipated and Mitigation Measure CR-2 is required as a condition of project approval to reduce these impacts to a less than significant level.

Mitigation Measure CR-2:

If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease. The archaeologist shall notify the San Bernardino County Coroner (per § 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code). The provisions of § 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, § 5097.98 of the California PRC, and AB 2641 will be implemented. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American and not the result of a crime scene, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which then will designate a Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD) (§ 5097.98 of the PRC). The designated MLD will have 48 hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning treatment of the remains. If the landowner does not agree with the recommendations of the MLD, the NAHC can mediate (§ 5097.94 of the PRC). If no agreement is reached, the landowner must rebury the remains where they will not be further disturbed (§ 5097.98 of the PRC). This will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center; using an open space or conservation zoning designation or easement; or recording a reinternment document with the county in which the property is located (AB 2641). Work may not resume within the no-work radius until the lead agencies, through consultation as appropriate, determine that the treatment measures have been completed to their satisfaction.

VI. ENERGY
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Result in a potentially significant
environmental impact due to wasteful,
inefficient, or unnecessary consumption
of energy, or wasteful use of energy
resources, during project construction or
operation?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 312 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 23 a) Less than Significant.

Electricity
Southern California Edison (SCE) provides electricity to the area of Project Site. Currently, the existing Project Site is vacant and undeveloped. Therefore, development of the Proposed Project would cause a permanent increase in demand for electricity when compared to existing conditions. The CalEEMod model projected that the Proposed Project would consume 0.917 GWh annually. According to the California Energy Commission, the commercial sector of the Southern California Edison planning area consumed 34,3738.76 GWh of electricity in 2020.8 The increase in electricity demand from the project would represent a 0.003 percent of the overall 2020 SCE commercial consumption.

Therefore, projected electrical demand would not significantly impact SCE’s level of service.

Natural Gas
The Project Site is located within the service area of Southern California Gas (SoCal Gas).

As CalEEMod does not include a “self-storage” as a defined land use sub-type, the “nonrefrigerated warehouse no-rail” land use sub-type was applied to the model. Contrary to the CalEEMod-estimated natural gas demand for the Proposed Project, the Project Applicant has indicated that the Proposed Project would not require a connection to natural gas lines. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not significantly impact SoCal Gas’s level of service.

No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
b) Less than Significant. As concluded above, the Proposed Project’s total impact on regional energy supplies would be minor. The proposed leasing office would be required to comply with the California Building Code (CBC) and California Green Building Standards Code (CALGreen Code) pertaining to energy and water conservation standards in effect at the time of construction. The Proposed Project includes the development of 835 storage units and a 700-SF leasing office, neither of which would have significant demand for electricity. In addition, the Proposed Project would not require connection to natural gas lines. The Proposed Project would not conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency and therefore no significant impacts are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are recommended.
8California Energy Commission. https://ecdms.energy.ca.gov/Default.aspx. Accessed April 15, 2022.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
b) Conflict with or obstruct a state or local
plan for renewable energy or energy
efficiency?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 313 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 24 VII. GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury,
or death involving:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the
State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer
to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii. Strong seismic ground shaking?
iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including
liquefaction?
iv. Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentially result in on or
off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
181-B of the California Building Code (1994),
creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life
or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the
use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of wastewater?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 314 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 25 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
f) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique
paleontological resource or site or unique
geologic feature?
a)
i. Less Than Significant. The Project Site does not occur within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone or San Bernardino County designated fault zone.9 The nearest fault zone is the San Andreas Fault Zone, which is approximately 2 miles north of the Project Site. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with the California Building Code (CBC) requirements and all applicable statutes, codes, ordinances, and standards of the San Bernardino County Fire Department. Compliance with these codes and standards would address potential impacts resulting from an earthquake event. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. ii. Less Than Significant. As is the case for most areas of Southern California, ground shaking resulting from earthquakes associated with nearby and more distant faults may occur at the Project Site. The design of any structures on-site would incorporate measures to accommodate projected seismic ground shaking in accordance with the CBC and local building regulations. The CBC is designed to preclude significant adverse effects associated with strong seismic ground shaking. Compliance can ensure that the Proposed Project would not expose people or structures to substantial adverse effects, including loss, injury or death, involving seismic ground shaking. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. iii. Less Than Significant. Liquefaction is a process whereby strong earthquake shaking causes sediment layers that are saturated with groundwater to lose strength and behave as a fluid. Ground failure associated with liquefaction can result in severe damage to structures. The Project Site is not located in an area susceptible to liquefaction.10 Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
iv. No Impact. The Project Site is not located within an area susceptible to landslides. 11 The
property and its immediate surroundings are relatively flat and level. Therefore, no impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. b) Less than Significant. Construction activities could result in soil erosion if the Project Site is not properly designed. The potential impacts of soil erosion would be minimized through 9 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.6-2:

Faults.
10Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.6- 4: Liquefaction Susceptibility.
11 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.6- 3: Landslide Potential.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 315 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 26 the preparation and implementation of a Storm Water Pollution and Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would prescribe temporary Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control wind and water erosion during and shortly after the construction of the proposed Project. Under proposed conditions, the Project Site would be developed with impervious surface and landscaping, thereby reducing the potential for soil erosion. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
c) Less than Significant. The Project Site is relatively flat with no prominent geologic features. The Project Site is not within an area susceptible to landslides.12 As stated above, the potential for liquefaction at the Project Site is very low. Because of the site’s relatively flat topography and low liquefaction potential, it would not be susceptible to lateral spreading. In addition, the Proposed Project would be required to comply with the CBC.

Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
d) Less than Significant. Expansive soils (shrink-swell) are fine grained clay soils generally found in historical floodplains and lakes. Expansive soils are subject to swelling and shrinkage in relation to the amount of moisture present in the soil. Soil types within the Project Site consists of Hanford coarse sandy loam (HaC) and Tujinga gravelly loamy sand (TvC).13 Loamy soils are usually a very stable soil that shows little change with the increase or decrease of moisture temperature.14 Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. e) No Impact. The Proposed Project would connect to the City’s existing sewer line along Wabash Avenue. No septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal are proposed. No impacts are identified or are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. f) Less Than Significant with Mitigation. Paleontological resources, including fossils, have been found in the Redlands area, and there is potential for paleontological finds to occur in remaining, unexcavated open space areas within and adjacent to the City.15 These resources are found in geologic strata conducive to their preservation, typically sedimentary formations. Paleontological resources have been identified in San Timoteo Canyon area in the past. The Project Site is located approximately 5 miles northeast of San Timoteo Canyon. The general area of the Project Site is developed and consists of residential, commercial, and light industrial uses. In the event that paleontological resources are discovered, the following mitigation measure shall be implemented:
12Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.6- 3: Landslide Potential.
13 ECORP Consulting, Inc. Biological Technical Report. January, 2022. 14 https://www.foundationrepairofca.com/foundation-repair/foundation-problems/settlement-sinking/foundationsoils.html 15 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 316 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 27 Mitigation Measure GEO-1:

Establish a procedure for the management of paleontological materials found on-site during a development, including the following provisions:
• If materials are found on-site during grading, require that work be halted until a qualified professional evaluates the find to determine if it represents a significant paleontological resource.
• If the resource is determined to be significant, the paleontologist shall supervise removal of the material and determine the most appropriate archival storage of the material.
• Appropriate materials shall be prepared, catalogued, and archived at the applicant’s expense and shall be retained within San Bernardino County if feasible.

VIII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly
or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on
the environment.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purposes of reducing the
emissions of greenhouse gases.
a) Less than Significant. Emissions were estimated using CalEEMod version 2022.1 with construction anticipated to begin in 2023 and be completed in 2024. The CalEEMod defaults were used for other parameters which are used to estimate construction emissions, such as the worker and vendor trips and trip lengths. The operational mobile emissions were calculated using CalEEMod with the vehicle trip generation estimates from the Traffic Circulation & VMT Impact Assessment, dated August 9, 2022, prepared for the Proposed Project by Linscott Law & Greenspan. It was determined that the Proposed Project will generate approximately 189 total daily trips.

Many gases make up the group of pollutants which contribute to global climate change.

However, three gases are currently evaluated and represent the highest concentration of GHG: Carbon dioxide (CO2), Methane (CH4), and Nitrous oxide (N2O). On December 5, 2017, the City of Redlands adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP), to focus on adaptive GHG measures that reduce emissions through standard practice measures and help prepare the City for the impacts of climate change. The CAP does not itself establish a numeric threshold of significance for determining impacts with respect to GHG emissions, however the City has utilized a screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 317 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 28 (MTCO2e) per year to determine if a potential GHG related impact would occur from a project. The Proposed Project’s emissions were compared to SCAQMD draft screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons CO2e. A summary of the results is shown below in Table 6 and Table 7.

Table 6
Greenhouse Gas Construction Emissions
(Metric Tons per Year)
Source/Phase CO2 CH4 N20 R1
2023 459 0.0 0.0 0.3
2024 63.1 0.0 0.0 --
Total (MTCO2e) 529.3
Construction Amortized 30 Years 17.6
Source: CalEEMod.2022.1 Annual Emissions.
1) Common refrigerant GHGs used in air conditioning and refrigeration equipment.

Table 7
Greenhouse Gas Operational Emissions
(Metric Tons per Year)
Source/Phase CO2 CH4 N20 R1
Mobile 328 0.0 0.0 0.6
Area 4.4 0.0 0.0 --
Energy 327 0.0 0.0 --
Water 58.9 1.4 0.0 --
Waste 15.1 1.5 0.0 --
Refrigeration -- -- -- 545
Construction Amortized 30 Years 17.6
Total (MTCO2e) 1,384.6
SCAQMD Threshold 3,000
Significant No
Source: CalEEMod.2022.1 Annual Emissions.
1) Common refrigerant GHGs used in air conditioning and refrigeration equipment.

As shown in Table 6 and Table 7, the Proposed Project’s emissions would not exceed SCAQMD’s draft screening threshold and the City’s threshold of significance. b) Less than Significant. The SCAQMD’s thresholds used the California Governor Executive Order S-3-05 goals as the basis for deriving the screening level. The Proposed Project’s emissions meet the threshold for compliance with Executive Order S-3-05, the Proposed Project’s emissions also comply with the goals of AB 32. Additionally, as the Proposed Project meets the current interim emissions targets/thresholds established by the SCAQMD (as described in Section III. Air Quality of this Initial Study), the Proposed Project would also be on track to meet the reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 as mandated by SB 32. Furthermore, all of the post-2020 reductions in GHG emissions are addressed via regulatory requirements at the State level and the Proposed Project will be required to comply with these regulations as they come into effect. As Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 318 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 29 discussed, the Proposed Project’s GHG emissions fall below the Tier 3 SCAQMD draft screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of CO2 equivalent per year and the Proposed Project is in compliance with the reduction goals AB 32 and SB 32. Furthermore, all of the post-2020 reductions in GHG emissions are addressed via regulatory requirements at the State level and the Proposed Project will be required to comply with these regulations as they come into effect.

The CAP quantifies existing and projected GHG emissions in the General Plan Planning Area through horizon year 2035 resulting from activities within the General Plan Planning Area and the region, and it includes GHG emissions reduction targets for the year 2035.

The CAP did not identify any required measure to achieve the emission targets. The Draft EIR for the Redlands General Plan and CAP determined that the General Plan would meet all State-mandated emissions targets through 2035. As the Proposed Project would be consistent with the Project Site’s land use designation of Commercial, it would not conflict with the CAP. Therefore, construction and operation of the Proposed Project will not conflict with any applicable plan, local or regional greenhouse gas plans. No significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

IX. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
Environment through the routine transport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset
and accident conditions involving the release of
hazardous materials into the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste
within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed
school?
d) Be located on a site, which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a
result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public airport or public use
airport, would the project result in a safety hazard
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 319 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 30 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
or excessive noise for people residing or working
in the project area?
f) Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
g) Expose people or structures, either directly or
indirectly to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires?
a, b) Less Than Significant. The Proposed Project includes the construction and operation of a self-storage facility and would not require the routine transport, use, storage, and disposal of limited quantities of common hazardous materials such as gasoline, diesel fuel, oils, solvents, paint, fertilizers, pesticides, and other similar materials. Operations would include standard maintenance (i.e., landscape upkeep, exterior painting and similar activities) involving the use of commercially available products (e.g., pesticides, herbicides, gas, oil, paint, etc.) the use of which would not create a significant hazard to the public. All materials required during construction would be kept in compliance with State and local regulations and BMPs. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
c) No Impact. The nearest school to Project Site is Redlands East Valley High School, approximately 0.3-mile southeast of the Project Site. No schools exist within 1/4-mile of the Project Site. Therefore, no impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
d) No Impact. The Project Site is not included on a list of hazardous material sites as compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and reported in the EnviroStor database.16 Therefore, no impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
e) No Impact. The nearest airport to the Project Site is the Redlands Municipal Airport, which is located approximately 0.8-mile north of the Project Site. The Project Site is not located within any Airport Compatibility Zone.
17 Therefore, no impact is identified or anticipated,
and no mitigation measures are required.
16 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.7- 1: Hazardous Material Site.
17 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.7- 2: Airport Hazards.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 320 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 31 f) Less than Significant. The Project Site does not contain any critical facilities.18 It is adjacent to Naples Avenue, Jasper Avenue, and Wabash Avenue, which are not evacuation routes.
19 Access to the Project Site would be provided by two proposed driveways: one from Jasper Avenue and one from Wabash Avenue. Entries to the storage units would be gated. Additionally, the California Emergency Services Act requires the City to manage and coordinate the overall emergency and recovery activities within its jurisdictional boundaries. The City's Emergency Operations Plan includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City in the event of a disaster. During disasters, the City of Redlands is required to coordinate emergency operations with the County of San Bernardino. Policies within the City’s General Plan and updates to the City’s Emergency Plan, as required by State law, would ensure the Proposed Project would not interfere with adopted policies and procedures. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
g) Less than Significant. The Project Site is located in an area with moderate threat to fire hazards.20 It is not located within a High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The property is located in a developed area with residential, commercial, and industrial uses.

The Project Site is not located adjacent to or near wildlands. The proposed development would replace the existing vegetation onsite with impervious surface, buildings with fire safety and fire suppression design elements, and proper landscaping, thereby reducing the risk of wildfire. Development of the Proposed Project shall comply with the California Fire Code. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. No significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

X. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or ground water quality?
b) Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the
project may impede substantial groundwater management
of the basin?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a 18 San Bernardino County. Countywide Policy Plan web maps: PP-1 “Critical Facilities.” Accessed June 20, 2022. 19 San Bernardino County. Countywide Policy Plan web maps: PP-2 “Evacuation Routes.” Accessed June 20, 2022. 20 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.7- 3: Fire Hazards and Fire Safety Services.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 321 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 32 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
stream or river or through the addition of impervious
surfaces, in a manner which would:
i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site;
iii) create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff; or
iv) impede or redirect flood flows?
d) In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation?
e) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water
quality control plan or substantial groundwater
management plan?
a) Less than Significant. The Proposed Project would disturb an approximate 6.34-acre site and would therefore be subject to the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. The State of California is authorized to administer various aspects of the NPDES. Construction activities covered under the State’s General Construction permit include the removal of vegetation, grading, excavating, or any other activity that causes the disturbance of one acre or more. The General Construction permit requires recipients to reduce or eliminate non-storm water discharges into stormwater systems, and to develop and implement a SWPPP. The SWPPP is based on the principles of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control and abate pollutants. The SWPPP must include BMPs to prevent project-related pollutants from impacting surface waters. The purpose of a SWPPP is to: 1) identify pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges of storm water associated with construction activities; and 2) identify, construct and implement storm water pollution control measures to reduce pollutants in storm water discharges from the construction site during and after construction.

The NPDES also requires a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), which is subject to review and approval by the City. A Preliminary WQMP was prepared for the Proposed Project by Hicks & Hartwick, Inc. (see Appendix D for report). The WQMP includes mandatory compliance of BMPs as well as compliance with NPDES Permit requirements.

Review and approval of the WQMP by the City would ensure that all potential pollutants of concern are minimized or otherwise appropriately treated prior to being discharged from the Project Site. No significant adverse impacts are identified or are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 322 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 33 b) Less Than Significant. The Project Site is located within the City of Redlands water service area. Redlands’ water supply is comprised primarily of surface water from the Santa Ana River (SAR) and Mill Creek and supplemented by groundwater extracted from the Bunker Hill Basin (part of the San Bernardino Basin) and Yucaipa Basin and a small amount of imported water when needed.21
The Urban Water Management Plan for City of Redlands is based on projected growth included in General Plans for areas within their service area. The Project Application includes an Ordinance Text Amendment to add "Self-storage with a minimum of 5 acres or more" as a use that requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the C-4 District.

Although the Proposed Project requires an Ordinance Text Amendment, the proposed selfstorage facility includes less water-intensive uses than the current C-4 district permitted uses, such as motels, retail stores, commercial greenhouses, etc. Therefore, the Proposed Project water demand is already anticipated in buildout projections of the General Plan Planning Area and incorporated into the Urban Water Management Plan.

Moreover, implementation of the project Best Management Practices (BMPs) would ensure that stormwater discharge does not substantially alter the existing drainage pattern and water quality, thereby allowing runoff from the Project Site to be utilized as a resource that can eventually be used for groundwater recharge. Therefore, the Proposed Project is not anticipated to have a substantial impact on groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge. No significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
c)
i) Less than Significant. Erosion is the wearing away of the ground surface as a result of the movement of wind or water, and siltation is the process by which water is affected by fine mineral particles in the water. Soil erosion could occur due to a storm event. The Construction General Permit requires the development and implementation of a SWPPP.

The SWPPP must list BMPs to avoid and minimize soil erosion. Adherence to BMPs would prevent substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil. Therefore, less than significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. ii, iii, iv)
Less than Significant. As stated in the WQMP, project flows from off‐site areas and perimeter landscape areas within the drainage area are collected in drainage swales around the site perimeter and are conveyed through a storm drain system to two infiltration basins.

The proposed buildings (storage units and leasing office) and parking lot/drive aisles would drain to a series of trench drain and catch basin inlets that all outlet through a storm drain system into the infiltrations basins for treatment. The outlet from the infiltration basins is a concrete curb drain spillway that drains to Wabash Avenue adjacent to the Project Site.

A Hydrology and Hydraulics preliminary report, prepared in January 2022 and updated in July 2022, was prepared for the Proposed Project by Hicks & Hartwick, Inc. (see 21 Water Systems Consulting, Inc. and Woodard & Curran. 2020 Upper Santa Ana River Watershed Integrated Regional Urban Water Management Plan.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 323 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 34 Appendix E for report). The report covers both the existing and proposed drainage conditions. The study watershed includes the Project Site, the RV storage facility to the east and a portion of the RV storage facility to the south.

The Proposed Project would convey the runoff through a basin and discharge into Wabash Avenue. The Proposed Project would cover the Project Site with impervious surface, thereby increasing the peak runoff flowrate and reducing the time of concentration. However, the Proposed Project basin will mitigate increases in peak run‐off generated from the project development to less than or equal to 90% of the pre‐ development peak flow rate from the site. The Proposed Project would decrease total discharge from the Project Site from 47.4 cubic-feet-per second (CFS) to 45.4 CFS.

Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in impacts to downstream street capacities, properties, and facilities.

No significant adverse impacts are identified or are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
d) Less Than Significant. Due to the inland distance from the Pacific Ocean and any other significant body of water, tsunamis and seiches are not potential hazards at the site. The Project Site is neither located within a 100-year floodplain nor a 500-year floodplain.22 Therefore, the risk of release of pollutants due to project inundation is low. No significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. e) Less than Significant. Requirements of a NPDES permit to be issued for the Proposed Project would include development and implementation of a SWPPP and is subject to RWQCB review and approval. The purpose of an SWPPP is to: 1) identify pollutant sources that may affect the quality of discharges of stormwater associated with construction activities; and 2) identify, construct and implement stormwater pollution control measures to reduce pollutants in stormwater discharges from the construction site during and after construction. The SWPPP would include BMPs to control and abate pollutants, and treat runoff that can be used for groundwater recharge. The Proposed Project would not otherwise substantially degrade water quality as appropriate measures relating to water quality protection would be implemented. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

XI. LAND USE AND PLANNING
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
22 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.9- 2 “Flood Hazards.”
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 324 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 35 b) Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or
regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
a) No Impact. The physical division of an established community is typically associated with construction of a linear feature, such as a major highway or railroad tracks, or removal of a means of access, such as a local road or bridge, which would impair mobility in an existing community or between a community and an outlying area. The Proposed Project does not include the construction of a linear feature and is not within a defined neighborhood area, and the Project Site is currently vacant. Therefore, the Proposed Project would neither physically divide an established community nor cause a significant environmental impact due to conflict with any land use plans or policies. No impacts would occur, and no mitigation measures are required.
b) Less Than Significant. The Project Site is currently undeveloped. It is designated Commercial and has a zoning of Highway Commercial (C-4). The purpose of the C-4 zone is to provide for the development of commercial enterprises adjacent to the major thoroughfares of the community. The Proposed Project is development of a self-storage facility with 11 buildings to include 835 units and a leasing office. The Project Application includes an Ordinance Text Amendment to add "Self-storage with a minimum of 5 acres or more" as a use that requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the C-4 District. The Proposed Project would be subject to the development standards required for uses within the C-4 District. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect. No significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

XII. MINERAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known
mineral resource that would be of value to the
region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally
important mineral resource recovery site
delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or
other land use plan?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 325 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 36 a, b) Less than Significant. The Project Site is located within a Mineral Resource Zone-2 (MRZ-2).
23 MRZ-2 are areas where geologic data indicate that significant PCC-Grade aggregate resources are present. The Project Site is located in a developed area of the city with residential, commercial, and light industrial uses. The Project Site is surrounded by development on all sides: residential and commercial uses to the north, an RV storage facility to the south, an RV storage facility to the east, and residential development and commercial shopping center to the west. The surrounding uses make the site unsuitable for mineral resources extraction. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

XIII. NOISE
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project result in:
a) Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent
increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of
the project in excess of standards established in the
local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable
standards of other agencies?
b) Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or
groundborne noise levels?
c) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing or
working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
a) Less than Significant. The unit of measurement used to describe a noise level is the decibel (dB). The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies within the sound spectrum.

Therefore, the “A-weighted” noise scale, which weights the frequencies to which humans are sensitive, is used for measurements. Noise levels using A-weighted measurements are written dB(A) or dBA.

Construction
The City’s Municipal Code Sections 8.06.120 (G) and 8.06.090 limit the hours of construction to between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM, including Saturdays, with no 23 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure

3.11-1: Mineral Resources.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 326 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 37 activities taking place at any time on Sundays or federal holidays. Per the EIR prepared for the City of Redlands General Plan (2019), a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels from construction noise would be considered less than significant if construction activities comply with the City’s Noise Control Ordinance in the Municipal Code, Section 8.06.090. Project construction will not occur outside of the hours outlined as “exempt” in City’s Municipal Code Sections 8.06.120 (G) and 8.06.090; and therefore, will not result in a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance. Impacts would be less than significant.

Operation
The Proposed Project is the development of a self-storage facility to include a leasing office. The proposed office space is not anticipated to generate any significant noise. The primary source of noise generated by the Proposed Project is on-site traffic. Noise levels associated with the operation of the Proposed Project are not expected to be significant as the Proposed Project is anticipated to generate approximately 189 trips per day with 12 AM peak hour trips and 20 PM peak hour trips. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. b) Less than Significant. Groundborne vibration and groundborne noise could originate from earth movement activities during the construction phase of the Proposed Project. Groundborne vibration levels resulting from construction activities occurring at the Project Site would be temporary and construction activities would generate low levels of ground-borne vibration within the Project Site include grading. The City’s Municipal Code Sections

8.06.120 (G) and 8.06.090 limit the hours of construction to between the hours of 7:00 AM and 6:00 PM, including Saturdays, with no activities taking place at any time on Sundays or federal holidays. Therefore, the vibration impacts due to Project construction are anticipated to result in less than significant impacts regarding exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. c) Less Than Significant. The nearest airport to the Project Site is the Redlands Municipal Airport, which is located approximately 0.8-mile north of the Project Site. The Project Site is not located within any Airport Compatibility Zone. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels.

No significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 327 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 38 XIV. POPULATION AND HOUSING
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Induce substantial unplanned population growth in
an area, either directly (for example, by proposing
new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing people or
housing, necessitating the construction of
replacement housing elsewhere?
a) Less Than Significant. Construction of the Proposed Project would not be expected to attract a substantial number of new employees to the area since there is an existing pool of construction labor in Redlands and surrounding cities. In 2019, the City was estimated to have 1,662 construction laborers and San Bernardino County was estimated to have 68,852 construction laborers.24 Construction activities would be temporary and would not attract new employees to the area.

The Project Application includes an Ordinance Text Amendment to add "Self-storage with a minimum of 5 acres or more" as a use that requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the C-4 District. The Proposed Project includes 123,456 square-feet (SF) of building coverage, of which 700 SF is proposed as office space. The Proposed Project would require at most two employees, based on one employee per 697 SF of office area.25 In contrast, a retail development with the same building coverage would require approximately 122 employees.26 Employment in the City is anticipated to increase by approximately 15,521 jobs between 2016 and 2035.27 The Proposed Project would represent approximately 0.01% of the City’s projected employment growth between 2016 and 2035.

Therefore, it would not induce substantial unplanned population growth within the City.

No significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
b) No Impact. The Project Site is currently undeveloped. Implementation of the Proposed Project would neither displace existing housing nor require construction of replacement housing elsewhere. Therefore, no impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
24 U.S. Census Bureau. 2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Profiles. 25 The Natelson Company, Inc. Employment Density Study. October 31, 2001. For San Bernardino County, the average square-feet per employee is 1,009.
26 The Natelson Company, Inc.. Employment Density Study. October 31, 2001. 27 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 328 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 39 XV. PUBLIC SERVICES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
a) Would the project result in substantial adverse
physical impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered governmental
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times
or other performance objectives for any of the
public services:

Fire Protection?
Police Protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other Public Facilities?
a)
Fire Protection
Less than Significant. Fire protection at the Project Site would be provided by the City of Redlands Fire Department (emergency operations, fire prevention services, and emergency medical services). The City of Redlands is served by four Redlands Fire Stations and responds as an all-risk fire and EMS agency. The Redlands Fire Department responded to 11,386 calls for service in 2021 and experiences a 6.65 percent increase on average annually. The Redlands Fire Department is staffed with 52 sworn personnel, of which 41 personnel are Paramedics and 16 are Emergency Medical Technicians. The Redlands Fire Department strives to meet the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards, which recommend that the first arriving unit arrive within four minutes 90 percent of the time. A more lenient goal of arriving eight minutes and 30 seconds 90 percent of the time, per the June 25, 2020 Fire Department Assessment and Deployment Study for the Redlands Fire Department, is a more realistic objective given the analysis within the study.

Currently, only 34 percent of the city is within an Effective Response Force (ERF) during congested periods. The Fire Department will be able to improve service levels with the addition of two new fire stations and the relocation of a third. This will increase the four‐ minute service response time by 60 percent, providing an improvement in the ability of first responders to reach areas within the community that are currently outside of a four‐ Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 329 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 40 minute response time window. San Bernardino County Fire Station 9, located at 1300 Crafton Avenue, is located approximately 0.8-mile east of the Project Site. Average travel time between County Fire Station 9 and the Project Site is approximately two minutes.28 Automatic aid provided by Station 9 to the City of Redlands is a contractual arrangement that ensures the best outcome for the patient and/or reduced property loss. This agreement is designed to have reciprocity and cooperation among fire agencies and can be rescinded if reciprocity is not achieved. Redlands Fire Department responds to multiple calls at one time (2 or more) 13.83 percent of the time. This is a significant percentage of calls that continues to rise based on the current fire and EMS defense system in the City.

Development of the Proposed Project may insignificantly increase the demand for fire protection services as it could increase the local area’s employee population by approximately two people. The Proposed Project is required to meet minimum fire safety requirements of Title 24 which helps to support fire suppression activities, including building construction, automatic fire sprinklersystems, fire hydrants, and paved fire access.

The City’s Fire Department and the Building Division enforce fire safety standards during review of building plans and inspections. Development impact fees (DIF) are collected at the time of building permit issuance and would increase funding to assist in reducing impacts to fire protection services. Therefore, less than significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation are required.

Police Protection
Less than Significant. The City of Redlands Police Department (RPD) provides police protection for the Project Site and vicinity. The service ratio for the City is 1.1 officers per 1,000 residents. Though the City does not have a service ratio standard, the City recognizes that its ratio falls below the national average of 2.1, and that hiring additional officers would be optimal.29 In 2015, the RPD had an average response time of 6.5 minutes for police services. Although there are no industry standards for response time to emergency calls, according to the City of Redlands, a response time of 4.5 minutes is desirable in a city of Redlands’ size. Development of the Proposed Project may incrementally increase the demand for police protection services due to the increased local employee population.

In its review of new development plans, the RPD evaluates project plans on its ability to provide proper police protection to the development. Additionally, the proponent of the Proposed Project would be required to pay service fees and DIF to the RPD. The DIF would be used to fund capital costs associated with acquiring land for new police stations, constructing new police stations, purchasing crime-fighting equipment for new police stations, and providing for additional staff as needed and as identified by the City.

Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
28 Timing is based on passenger-car travel and is therefore conservative. 29 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 330 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 41 Schools
Less than Significant. The Redlands Unified School District (RUSD) provides public schools in the General Plan Planning Area, which includes the Project Site. Construction and operation of new school facilities would be funded through school impact fees assessed on new developments that occur within the school district. The Proposed Project is not anticipated to substantially increase population growth within the area, as the future employees would likely come from the local area (see XIV-a above), and therefore would not generate new students. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

Parks
Less than Significant. The Redlands Parks Division currently operates 18 parks.30 Implementation of the Proposed Project would not induce residential development and would not significantly increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of any facilities would result. Additionally, collection of DIF would ensure no significant impacts to parks would occur. The Redlands Municipal Code provides for open space and park fees (i.e. DIF) to be imposed as a condition of approval of new residential, commercial, and office and industrial development (Chapter 3.32). The DIF are intended to ensure that open space lands and active and passive parks are made available to the public concurrent with the need for such lands and parks caused by new development. They may be used to pay for costs incurred by the City for acquiring, developing, improving, and expanding open space areas, scenic drives, parks, playgrounds, and recreational facilities to meet the increased needs for those facilities resulting from the effects of new development.

Collection of the DIF would ensure no significant impacts to parks would occur. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

Other Public Facilities
Less than Significant. DIF are charged by local governments to defray all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to development projects. The requirements for enactment of a development impact fee program are set forth in Government Code Sections 66000- 66025 (the “Mitigation Fee Act”). In Redlands, DIF are collected at the time a building permit is issued for the purpose of mitigating the impacts caused by new development on the City’s infrastructure. Fees are used to finance the acquisition, construction, and improvement of public facilities needed as a result of a new development. A separate funding structure has been established to account for the impact of new development on each of the following types of public facilities: Open Space, Parks, Public Facilities (including public safety, library and general government facilities), Transportation, Water, Solid Waste, and Sewer. Collection of DIF would ensure no significant impacts to other 30 City of Redlands. City-Owned and Operated Parks. https://www.cityofredlands.org/parks. Accessed August 9, 2022.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 331 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 42 public facilities would occur. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

XVI. RECREATION
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
a) Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other
recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur
or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or
require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities, which might have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
a) Less than Significant. The Redlands Parks Division currently operates 18 parks.

Implementation of the Proposed Project would not induce residential development and would not significantly increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of any facilities would result.

The Redlands Municipal Code provides for open space and park fees to be imposed as a condition of approval of new residential, commercial, and office and industrial development (Chapter 3.32). The fees are intended to ensure that open space lands and active and passive parks are made available to the public concurrent with the need for such lands and parks caused by new development. They may be used to pay for costs incurred by the City for acquiring, developing, improving, and expanding open space areas, scenic drives, parks, playgrounds, and recreational facilities to meet the increased needs for those facilities resulting from the effects of new development. Collection of DIF would ensure no significant impacts to parks would occur. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. b) No Impact. The Proposed Project does not include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities. Therefore, no impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 332 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 43 XVII. TRANSPORTATION
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Conflict with a program, plan, ordinance or policy
addressing the circulation system, including
transit, roadways, bicycle lanes and pedestrian
facilities?
b) Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with
CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision
(b)?
c) Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric
design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous
intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm
equipment)?
d) Result in inadequate emergency access?
a) Less Than Significant. A Traffic Circulation & VMT Impact Assessment, dated August 9, 2022, was prepared for the Proposed Project by Linscott, Law & Greenspan (see Appendix F for report). The Proposed Project is forecast to generate 189 daily trips, with 12 trips (6 inbound, 6 outbound) produced in the AM peak hour and 20 trips (10 inbound, 10 outbound) produced in the PM peak hour on a “typical” weekday. The Connected City theme of the General Plan promotes an efficient and integrated circulation system by enhancing the vehicular, biking, walking, and transit networks. The following analysis details project consistency with the applicable Connected City proposed actions:
5-A.14: Close the gaps in the sidewalk network where streets are built out but sidewalks are not complete.

Consistency: The segments of Wabash Avenue, Naples Avenue, and Jasper Avenue adjacent to the Project Site are currently missing sidewalks. The Proposed Project would provide landscaped sidewalks along the sections.
5-A.15: Maintain access for emergency vehicles and services by providing two means of ingress/egress into new communities, limitations on the length of cul-de-sacs, proper roadway widths and road grades, adequate turning radius, and other requirements per the California Fire Code.

Consistency: Access for the Proposed Project will be provided via one (1) 30-foot driveway located along Wabash Avenue and 1 30-foot driveway located along Jasper Avenue. Recreational vehicles and small moving vans (i.e. U-Haul, etc.) will be able to adequately circulate throughout the site. The driveway width has been confirmed and are generally adequate for large pick-up trucks and small moving vans.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 333 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 44 5-A.24: Use the City’s Bicycle Master Plan as the primary resource for planning and implementing bikeway improvements.
5-A.26: Implement bicycle and trail improvements that provide strong north-south connections, especially with major eastwest trails, including routes on Mountain View Avenue, California Street, Nevada Street, Alabama Street, Texas Street, New York Street, Orange Street, Church Street, Dearborn Street, and Wabash Avenue.

Consistency: The portion of Wabash Avenue adjacent to the Project Site is a proposed future bike route.31 The Proposed Project would dedicate 4 feet to the right-of-way along Wabash Avenue, which would allow for future bicycle and trail improvements along that street.

5.A.47: Maximize the carrying capacity of arterials and boulevards by controlling the number of driveways and intersections, limiting residential access where applicable, and requiring sufficient on-site parking to meet the needs of proposed projects.

Consistency: Access to the Proposed Project would be provided by two gated driveways, one along Wabash Avenue and the other along Jasper Avenue. The Proposed Project is required to provide a minimum of 4 parking stalls. The Project Applicant would provide 5 parking stalls.
5-A.53: Allow the City Engineer to require additional right-of-way and pavement width for local and collector roads in the Commercial, Commercial/Industrial, Light Industrial, and Public/Institutional land use designations based on existing street sections, traffic volumes, and truck traffic.

Consistency: The Project Site is designated Commercial. Wabash Avenue adjacent to the Project Site is identified as a minor arterial road. Jasper Avenue adjacent to the Project Site is identified as a local road.
32 The Proposed Project includes a Street
vacation to vacate 3 feet on Jasper Avenue. With this street vacation, the Jasper Avenue right-of-way would be 63 feet wide. Local streets are two-lane roads with 60 feet dedicated to the right-of-way.33 Therefore, the requested street vacation would neither conflict with Jasper Avenue’s street classification.
5-A.68: Provide for direct pedestrian paths and access from new developments to the nearest public transportation stop.

Consistency: OmniTrans Bus Route #8 includes a bus stop on the intersection of Lugonia Avenue and Wabash Avenue, approximately 500 feet north of the Project Site. 31 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan 2035. Adopted December 5, 2017. Figure 5-3: “Bicycle Facilities.”
32 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan 2035. Adopted December 5, 2017. Figure 5-5: “Roadway Classification.”
33 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan 2035. Adopted December 5, 2017. Figure 5-6: “Illustrative Street Sections.”
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 334 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 45 The Proposed Project would provide sidewalks along Project Site frontage on Wabash Avenue, Naples Avenue, and Jasper Avenue.

As summarized above, the Proposed Project would not conflict with the Connected City theme of the General Plan. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
b) Less than Significant. The approach and methodology outlined in the VMT Assessment is based on the City of Redlands CEQA Assessment VMT Analysis Guidelines and is generally consistent with the Technical Advisory for Evaluating Transportation Impacts In CEQA, published by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR). The City of Redlands has developed SB 743 VMT Impact Screening Criteria to serve as a screening tool for potential VMT impacts associated with select land use projects in the city.

Small project screening applies to projects with low trip generation per CEQA exemptions or results in a 3,000 Metric Tons of Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (MTCO2e) per year screening level threshold, based on the County of San Bernardino’s Climate Action Plan and South Coast Air Quality Management District’s draft interim guidance for assessing project-level greenhouse gas impacts. Since the Proposed Project consists of miniwarehousing of 123,456 SF, which is less than the “Small Projects” (< 3,000 MT CO2e) threshold of 463,600 square feet, this project could be screened from a VMT analysis and would not have a significant transportation related CEQA impact. No significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. c) Less than Significant. The Project Site is not adjacent to windy roads or dangerous intersections. The Proposed Project is development of a self-storage facility. It does not include a geometric design or incompatible uses that would substantially increase hazards.

The Proposed Project would be compatible with the surrounding commercial and light industrial uses, and does not include uses that would be obtrusive to the nearby residential uses. The Proposed Project is required to provide a minimum of four parking stalls; the Proposed Project would provide five. The on-site circulation layout of the Proposed Project would provide adequate spacing for reciprocal access. Recreational vehicles and small moving vans (i.e. U-Haul, etc.) will be able to adequately circulate throughout the site, thereby ensuring that project vehicles do not park off-site and interfere with external traffic.

Roadway frontage improvements would be designed and constructed to satisfy all City requirements for street widths, corner radii, and intersection control, as well as incorporate design standards tailored specifically to site access requirements. The Site Plan is subject to approval by the City of Redlands Fire Department. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. d) Less than Significant. Access for the Proposed Project will be provided via 1 30-foot driveway located along Wabash Avenue and 1 30-foot driveway located along Jasper Avenue. Recreational vehicles and small moving vans (i.e. U-Haul, etc.) will be able to adequately circulate throughout the site. The driveway width has been confirmed and are generally adequate for large pick-up trucks and small moving vans. The proposed internal driveways would be at least 26-feet throughout the Project Site. The on-site circulation Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 335 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 46 layout of the Proposed Project would provide adequate spacing for reciprocal access. The Proposed Project includes a Street vacation to vacate 3-feet on Jasper Avenue. With this street vacation, the Jasper Avenue right-of-way would be 63-feet wide. As stated previously, the segment of Jasper Avenue adjacent to the Project Site is identified as a local road. Local streets are two-lane roads with 60-feet dedicated to the right-of-way.34 Therefore, the requested street vacation would neither conflict with Jasper Avenue’s street classification nor interfere with circulation along that road. During construction, the contractor would be required to maintain adequate emergency access for emergency vehicles. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

XVIII.TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse
change in the significance of a tribal cultural
resource, defined in Public Resources Code
section 21074 as either a site, feature, place,
cultural landscape that is geographically defined
in terms of the size and scope of the landscape,
sacred place, or object with cultural value to a
California Native American tribe, and that is?
i) Listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register of Historical Resources, or in a local
register of historical resources as defined in Public
Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or?
ii) A resource determined by the lead agency, in
its discretion and supported by substantial
evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set
forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code
Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in
subdivision (c) of Public Resource Code Section
5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the
significance of the resource to a California Native
American tribe?
a)
i) Less Than Significant with Mitigation. A Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report was prepared for the Project Site in June 2022 by ECORP. A records search of the California Historical Resources Information System at the South Central Coastal Information Center indicated that no previous cultural resource studies have been 34 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan 2035. Adopted December 5, 2017. Figure 5-6: “Illustrative Street Sections.”
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 336 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 47 conducted within the Project Site. Twenty-six studies have been conducted within 1 mile of the Project Site. Fifty-four cultural resources were previously recorded within 1 mile of the Project Site. One previously recorded resource, P-36-012351, Wingate Ranch, extends into the Project Site. A search of the Sacred Lands File was completed by the California Native American Heritage Commission and resulted in a positive finding, indicating that Native American Sacred Lands have been recorded in the Project Site. As a result of the field survey, one historic-period cultural resource was recorded inside the Project Site:

MW-001, a concrete pad associated with agriculture. Resource P-36-012351 and newly identified resource MW-001 have both been evaluated as not eligible for the NRHP or the CRHR under any criteria. Due to the presence of Holocene sediments within the Project Site, there is a moderate potential for the discovery of subsurface deposits or eligible sites within the Project Area. With implementation of Mitigation Measure CR-1, potential impacts to tribal cultural resources are anticipated to be less than significant. ii) Less Than Significant with Mitigation. California Assembly Bill 52 (AB52) was approved by Governor Brown on September 25, 2014. AB52 specifies that CEQA projects with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource may have a significant effect on the environment. As such, the bill requires lead agency consultation with California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of a proposed project, if the tribe requested to the lead agency, in writing, to be informed of proposed projects in that geographic area.

The legislation further requires that the tribe-requested consultation be completed prior to determining whether a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration, or environmental impact report is required for a project.

On April 11, 2022, the City provided notification to the following tribes in accordance with AB52: the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians – Kizh Nation (Gabrieleno), Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians (Soboba), Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation (SMBMI), Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, and Morongo Band of Mission Indians.

In an email dated May 9, 2022, SMBMI indicated that the Project Site exists within Serrano ancestral territory and is therefore of interest to the Tribe. However, SMBMI did not have any concerns with the project’s implementation, at the time of writing the email. The Tribe requested that the following mitigation measures be incorporated:

Mitigation Measure TCR-1:

The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in CR-1, of any pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBMI, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 337 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 48 represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site.

Mitigation Measure TCR-2:

Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project.

XIX. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
Would the project:
a) Require or result in the relocation or construction
of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment
or storm water drainage, electric power, natural
gas, or telecommunications, the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve
the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and multiple dry
years?
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment
of solid waste reduction goals?
e) Comply with federal, state, and local management
and reduction statutes and regulations related to
solid waste?
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 338 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 49 a) Less Than Significant. The Project Site is located within the City of Redlands water and sewer service areas. The Proposed Project would connect to the existing 20-inch water lines along Wabash Avenue and to the existing 18-inch sewer line along Wabash Avenue.

The Proposed Project would be serviced by Southern California Edison (SCE), which provides electrical service to the general area. There is an existing electric and telephone pole at the intersection of Naples Avenue and Chrysolite Avenue that the Proposed Project will connect to.

There are existing Southern California Gas (SoCal) gas lines along Wabash Avenue.

However, the Project Applicant has indicated that no connection is necessary for the Proposed Project.

The Proposed Project would convey the project runoff to a proposed infiltration basin before discharging to the existing drainage facilities along Wabash Avenue.

The Proposed Project is not anticipated to require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electrical power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities that would cause significant environmental effects. No significant adverse impacts are identified or are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
b) Less than Significant. The Project Site is located within the City of Redlands water service area. Redlands’s water supply is comprised primarily of surface water from the Santa Ana River and Mill Creek and supplemented by groundwater extracted from the Bunker Hill Basin (part of the San Bernardino Basin) and Yucaipa Basin and a small amount of imported water when needed.35 The Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP) for City of Redlands is based on projected growth included in General Plans for areas within their service area.

Per UWMP requirements, Redlands has evaluated reliability for an average year, single dry year, and a 5 consecutive dry year period. Redlands’s demands in single dry years are assumed to increase by 10% above normal year demands. The local groundwater basins Redlands produces water from have storage for use in dry years so Redlands’s supplies are 100% reliable during normal and single dry years.36 Moreover, Redlands can produce the volume of water needed to meet 100% of demands in multiple dry years.37 The Project Application includes an Ordinance Text Amendment to add "Self-storage with a minimum of 5 acres or more" as a use that requires a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the C-4 District. Although the Proposed Project requires an Ordinance Text Amendment, the proposed self-storage facility includes less water-intensive uses than the current C-4 35 Water Systems Consulting, Inc. and Woodard & Curran. 2020 Upper Santa Ana River Watershed Integrated Regional Urban Water Management Plan.
36 Water Systems Consulting, Inc. and Woodard & Curran. 2020 Upper Santa Ana River Watershed Integrated Regional Urban Water Management Plan.
37 Water Systems Consulting, Inc. and Woodard & Curran. 2020 Upper Santa Ana River Watershed Integrated Regional Urban Water Management Plan.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 339 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 50 district permitted uses, such as motels, retail stores, commercial greenhouses, etc.

Therefore, the Proposed Project water demand is already anticipated from buildout of the General Plan Planning Area. Since the City has sufficient water supplies to meet current and future development consistent with its General Plan through the year 2035, additional water storage and treatment facilities are not anticipated to be required through build out of the General Plan in 2035.

No significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
c) Less Than Significant. Sewer service in the General Plan Planning Area is provided by the City of Redlands. The Redlands Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) has a secondary treatment capacity of 9.5 million gallons per day (mgd). 38 Approximately 6 million gallons
of that capacity is in a membrane bioreactor system, the remaining 3.5 million gallons is in a conventional activated sludge process. The WWTP meets all current regional, State, and federal requirements for secondary treatment. The City regularly samples the WWTP’s influent and effluent to ensure compliance with State regulations. Current regulations require compliance with water quality standards and these measures would preclude development lacking adequate utility capacity, including wastewater treatment capacity.

The Proposed Project would be reviewed by the City and the applicable wastewater providers to determine that sufficient sewer capacity exists to serve the additional population that would be generated by project. The City would continue to coordinate with the wastewater service providers to ensure that new development would not exceed the capacity of wastewater conveyance and treatment facilities. The Proposed Project would be required to pay development impact fees based on the volume of wastewater generated.

However, the proposed 700-SF leasing office would be the only wastewater-generating use and flows would be minimal as the office does not include living space. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
d) Less than Significant. Solid waste from Redlands is primarily disposed of at the California Street Landfill operated by the Quality of Life Department and the San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill operated by the County, both within the city limits. The California Street Landfill is located at 2151 Nevada Street and encompasses 115 acres. Its design capacity is

11.4 million cubic yards, and its maximum permitted capacity is 10 million cubic yards. It has a maximum permitted throughput of 829 tons per day. As of July 25, 2018, it has a remaining capacity of 5,168,162 cubic yards.
39 The San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill is
located on San Timoteo Canyon Road and is 366 acres in size. It has a permitted capacity of 20,400,000 cubic yards and a maximum permitted daily throughput of 2,000 tons. As of April 30, 2019, the remaining capacity was 12,360,396 cubic yards.40 The California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle) provides unofficial estimates of solid waste generation and disposal rates for five different land use 38 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. 39 CalRecycle. Solid Waste Information System database. 40 CalRecycle. Solid Waste Information System database.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 340 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 51 or business types: commercial, industrial, institutional, residential, and service. Given that the proposed development project is a self-storage facility, the only daily generation of waste would come from the proposed 700-SF leasing office. Based on these uses, the Proposed Project is estimated to generate a total of 4.2 pounds of solid waste per day, or approximately 0.002 tons per day (0.006 pounds per square-feet of office space per day).41 It is anticipated that patrons of the storage facility would contribute minimally to the generation of solid waste on a daily basis through clean out of units.

Therefore, the Proposed Project solid waste generation contribution to these landfills would be nominal and would not exceed the daily permitted capacities of these facilities. No significant adverse impacts are identified or are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
e) Less than Significant. The Proposed Project would be required to comply with City of Redlands Municipal Chapter 13.66 (Recycling Requirements for Specified Developmental Activity). Chapter 13.66 establishes requirements for recycling by specified development activities to facilitate the City's compliance with state recycling mandates, remove architectural barriers to recycling and ensure the recycling of construction and demolition.

The Project Applicant is required to coordinate with a waste hauler to collect solid waste on a common schedule as established in applicable local, regional, and State programs. The Proposed Project shall adhere the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB 939), AB 1327, Chapter 18 (California Solid Waste Reuse and Recycling Access Act of 1991), and any other applicable local, State, and federal solid waste management regulations. Therefore, no significant adverse impacts are identified or are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

XX. WILDFIRE
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project:
a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose
project occupants to, pollutant concentrations
from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a
wildfire?
c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel
breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or
41 CalRecycle. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Accessed June 23, 2022.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 341 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 52 Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant with
Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that
may result in temporary ongoing impacts to the
environment?
d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?
a) Less than Significant. The Project Site does not contain any critical facilities. It is adjacent to Naples Avenue, Jasper Avenue, and Wabash Avenue, which are not evacuation routes.42 Access to the Project Site would be provided by two proposed driveways: one from Jasper Avenue and one from Wabash Avenue. Entries to the storage units would be gated. Additionally, the California Emergency Services Act requires the City to manage and coordinate the overall emergency and recovery activities within its jurisdictional boundaries. The City's Emergency Operations Plan includes policies and procedures to be administered by the City in the event of a disaster. During disasters, the City of Redlands is required to coordinate emergency operations with the County of San Bernardino. Policies within the City’s General Plan and updates to the City’s Emergency Plan, as required by State law, would ensure the Proposed Project would not interfere with adopted policies and procedures. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
b) Less than Significant. The Project Site is located in an area with moderate threat to fire hazards.43 It is not located within a High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The property is located in a developed area with residential, commercial, and light industrial uses. The Project Site is not located adjacent to or near wildlands. Development of the Proposed Project shall comply with the California Fire Code. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. No significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.
c) Less than Significant. The Proposed Project may include the installation of utilities; however, installation, operation and maintenance of utilities would be in compliance with fire safety regulations. The Project Site is not located within a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone.44 The proposed self-storage facility would replace the existing vegetation onsite with impervious surface, buildings with fire safety and fire suppression design elements, and proper landscaping, thereby reducing the risk of wildfire. Therefore, no significant impacts are identified or anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required. 42 San Bernardino County. Countywide Policy Plan web maps: PP-2 “Evacuation Routes.” Accessed June 21, 2022 43 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.7- 3: Fire Hazards and Fire Safety Services.
44 Placeworks. San Bernardino Countywide Policy Plan Draft EIR. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. Figure 5.8-6 ”Fire Severity and Growth Areas in the East Desert Regions.” Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 342 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 53 d) Less than Significant. The Project Site is neither located within a 100-year floodplain nor a 500-year floodplain.45 Furthermore, it is not located within a High or Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. The property is located in a relatively flat and developed area. The Project Site is not located adjacent to or near wildlands. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not expose persons or structures to post-fire slope instability or post-fire drainage.

No significant impacts are identified or are anticipated, and no mitigation measures are required.

XXI. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
with Mitigation
Less than
Significant
No
Impact
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the
quality of the environment, substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
a) Less than Significant with Mitigation. A Biological Technical report was prepared in June 2022 for the Proposed Project by ECORP. The literature review and database searches identified 32 special-status plant species that have been documented in the vicinity of the Project Site. The 32 special-status plant species were presumed to be absent due to the lack of suitable habitat onsite. Of the 49 special-status wildlife species identified in the literature review and database searches, one was found to have a low potential to occur: burrowing owl. During the survey, no suitable burrows or burrow-like structures were observed on or adjacent to the Project Site. The site contained marginally suitable burrowing owl habitat consisting of low-growing ruderal grassland habitat and friable, sandy loam soils. To avoid potentially significant impacts to burrowing owl, Mitigation Measure BIO-1 shall be 45 Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017. Figure 3.9- 2 “Flood Hazards.”
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 343 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 54 implemented. The remaining 48 special-status wildlife species are presumed absent from occurring on or adjacent to the site due to the lack of suitable habitat; proximity to the surrounding residential, commercial, and industrial development; and the presence of anthropogenic disturbances associated with the commercial and industrial development surrounding the site. The Peruvian pepper tree observed on the Project Site and the trees immediately adjacent to the Project Site could provide nesting habitat for nesting birds and ground nesting bird species. If construction of the Proposed Project occurs during the bird breeding season (typically February 1 through August 31), ground-disturbing construction activities could directly affect birds protected by the MBTA and their nests through the removal of habitat on the Project Site, and indirectly through increased noise, vibrations, and increased human activity. Impacts to nesting birds would be less than significant with the implementation of Mitigation Measure BIO-2
A Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report was prepared for the Project Site in June 2022 by ECORP. The inventory included a records search, literature review, and field survey. A records search of the California Historical Resources Information System at the South Central Coastal Information Center indicated that no previous cultural resource studies have been conducted within the Project Site. Twenty-six studies have been conducted within 1 mile of the Project Site. Fifty-four cultural resources were previously recorded within 1 mile of the Project Site. One previously recorded resource, P-36-012351, extends into the Project Site. A search of the Sacred Lands File was completed by the California Native American Heritage Commission and resulted in a positive finding, indicating that Native American Sacred Lands have been recorded in the Project Site. As a result of the field survey, one historic-period cultural resource was recorded inside the Project Site: MW-001, a concrete pad associated with agriculture. Resource P-36-012351 and newly identified resource MW-001 have both been evaluated as not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources under any criteria. Due to the presence of Holocene sediments within the Project Site, there is a moderate potential for the discovery of subsurface deposits or eligible sites within the Project Site. Therefore, Mitigation Measures CR-1, CR-2, TCR-1, and TCR-2 shall be implemented to address potential impacts to cultural resources. b) Less than Significant. Cumulative impacts are defined as two or more individual affects that, when considered together, are considerable or that compound or increase other environmental impacts. The cumulative impact from several projects is the change in the environment that results from the incremental impact of the development when added to the impacts of other closely related past, present, and reasonably foreseeable or probable future developments. Cumulative impacts can result from individually minor, but collectively significant, developments taking place over a period. The CEQA Guidelines, Section 15130 (a) and (b), states:
(a) Cumulative impacts shall be discussed when the project’s incremental effect is cumulatively considerable.
(b) The discussion of cumulative impacts shall reflect the severity of the impacts and their likelihood of occurrence, but the discussion need not provide as great detail as Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 344 of 1131 Initial Study for GO-Store-It
City of Redlands, California Environmental Checklist Form 55 is provided of the effects attributable to the project. The discussion should be guided by the standards of practicality and reasonableness.

Air Quality
Development of the Proposed Project will be conditioned to comply with current SCAQMD rules and regulations to minimize impacts to air quality as discussed. Approval of the project does not require a zone change nor a general plan amendment and is consistent with the City General Plan land use designation. Therefore, cumulative impacts are anticipated to be less than significant.

Greenhouse Gas
Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are cumulative in nature, in that, no one single project can measurably contribute to climate change and its affects (global average change in temperature, rising sea levels etc.). The direct or indirect GHG impacts are therefore not evaluated on a local level, but whether or not the GHG emissions resulting from the project are cumulative; that is, they add considerably to an increase in GHGs as compared to the existing environmental setting based on: 1) an established significance threshold(s); or 2) the extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions.

As summarized previously, the Proposed Project’s GHG emissions fall below the Tier 3 SCAQMD draft screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of CO2 equivalent per year and the Proposed Project is in compliance with the reduction goals AB 32 and SB 32.

Furthermore, all of the post-2020 reductions in GHG emissions are addressed via regulatory requirements at the State level and the Proposed Project will be required to comply with these regulations as they come into effect. Moreover, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the Project Site’s land use designation of Commercial, therefore it would not conflict with the CAP. As such, the Proposed Project’s incremental contribution to greenhouse gas emissions and their effects on climate change would not be cumulatively considerable.

Although cumulative impacts are always possible, the Proposed Project, by incorporating all mitigation measures outlined herein, would reduce its contribution to any such cumulative impacts to less than cumulatively considerable. Therefore, with the incorporation of mitigation measured identified in this document, the Proposed Project would result in individually limited, but not cumulatively considerable, impacts. c) Less the Significant. The development of the Proposed Project would not cause adverse impacts on humans, either directly or indirectly. As is most case for most areas in southern California, the Project Site is susceptible to seismic hazards. As summarized in Section VII, the Proposed Project is not susceptible to geologic hazards. Good planning and design of the project can limit the impact of these constraints. With adherence to the City of Redlands Development Code and California Building Code, the Proposed Project is not anticipated to result in a safety hazard for people residing or working at the Project Site.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 345 of 1131 Initial Study for GOStoreIt
City of Redlands, California References
56 SECTION 4

REFERENCES
CalRecycle. Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Accessed June 23, 2022.

CalRecycle. Solid Waste Information System database.

California Energy Commission. https://ecdms.energy.ca.gov/Default.aspx. Accessed April 15, 2022.

City of Redlands. City-Owned and Operated Parks. https://www.cityofredlands.org/parks ‘ Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan 2035. Adopted December 5, 2017.

Dyett and Bhatia. City of Redlands General Plan Update and Climate Action Plan EIR. July 21, 2017.

The Natelson Company, Inc. Employment Density Study. October 31, 2001.

Placeworks. San Bernardino Countywide Policy Plan Draft EIR. July 21, 2017.

San Bernardino County. Policy Plan web maps. Accessed periodically.

U.S. Census Bureau. 2019: ACS 5-Year Estimates Data Profiles.

Water Systems Consulting, Inc. and Woodard & Curran. 2020 Upper Santa Ana River Watershed Integrated Regional Urban Water Management Plan.

Project-Specific References
ECORP Consulting, Inc. Biological Technical Report – Mentone Wabash and Naples Project. June 2022.

ECORP Consulting, Inc. Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation Report for the Redlands Self Storage Project. June 2022.

Hicks & Hartwick, Inc. Hydrology and Hydraulics Preliminary Report. Prepared January 2022 and Updated July 2022.

Hicks & Hartwick, Inc. Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan Report. Approved: tbd.

Linscott Law & Greenspan, Engineers. Updated Traffic Circulation & VMT Impact Assessment for the Proposed Madison Capital Self Storage Project. August 9, 2022.

Lilburn Corporation. CalEEMod Outputs for GOStoreIt. July 21, 2022.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 346 of 1131 August 25, 2022 Transmitted Via Email
File: 10(ENV)-4.01

CITY OF REDLANDS
Planning Division,
35 Cajon St., Suite 20
Redlands, CA 92373
ATTN: Brian Foote, -City Planner/Planning Mgr.
[email protected]
RE: CITY OF REDLANDS- GO-Store-It Self Storage Project (Conditional Use Permit No. 1168, Lot Merger No. 003, Ordinance Text Amendment No. 363, and Street Vacation No. 186) Dear Mr. Foote:

Thank you for allowing the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works the opportunity to comment on the above-referenced project. We received this request on August 23, 2022 and pursuant to our review, we have the following comments for considerations and inclusion into public record:

Traffic Division (Shawn Johnson, Engineering Technician IV, 909-387-1869):

1. The proposed Project is located adjacent to San Bernardino County Maintained Road (Naples Ave.

Road Number 586100). Any encroachments including, but not limited to access for grading, installing single residential driveway approach, adding sidewalk to existing curb & gutter, installing commercial driveway approach, installing a traffic sign, mountain area parking deck structures and any type of above ground structure that encroaches onto County Maintained Roads or right-of-way will require a permit from the Department of Public Works prior to start of construction. The necessity for permits, and any impacts associated with them, should be addressed in the IS/MND prior to adoption and certification.

We respectfully request to be included on the circulation list for all project notices, public reviews, or public hearings. In closing, I would like to thank you again for allowing the San Bernardino County Department of Public Works the opportunity to comment on the above-referenced project. Should you have any questions or need additional clarification, please contact the individuals who provided the specific comment, as listed above.

Sincerely,
Anthony Pham, P.E.

Chief,
Environmental Management
Department of Public Works • Flood Control • Special Districts • Operations • Surveyor
• Solid Waste Management • Transportation
Main Office - 825 East Third Street, San Bernardino, CA 92415-0835 | Phone: 909.387.7910 Fax: 909.387.7911 Brendon Biggs, M.S., P.E.

Director
Trevor Leja
Assistant Director
Noel Castillo, P.E.

Assistant Director
on behalf of
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 347 of 1131

MITIGATION MONITORING REPORTING PROGRAM
Project: GO-Store-It Self-Storage Project_______ Applicant: Madison Capital Group, LLC Lead Agency: City of Redlands Date: August 2022
Mitigation Measures No. /
Implementing Action
Implementation
Timing
Party Responsible
for Implementation
Party Responsible for
Monitoring Date of Completion/Notes
Biological Resources
BIO-1: Preconstruction surveys for burrowing owl
shall be conducted. The surveys shall follow the
methods described in the California Department of
Fish & Wildlife’s (CDFW) Staff Report on Burrowing
Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and
Game [CDFG] 2012). Two surveys shall be
conducted, with the first survey being scheduled
between 30 and 14 days before initial ground
disturbance (grading, grubbing, and construction),
and the second survey being conducted no more than
24 hours prior to initial ground disturbance. If
burrowing owls and/or suitable burrowing owl burrows
are identified on the Project Site during the survey,
the Project Proponent shall consult with CDFW and
follow the methods listed in the CDFW’s Staff Report
on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012) for
avoidance and/or passive relocation. If burrowing
owls or suitable burrowing owl burrows with sign (e.g., whitewash, pellets, feathers, prey remains) are
identified on the Project Site during the survey, these features must be completely avoided. If impacts to
those features are unavoidable, then the Project
Proponent must also develop an owl mitigation plan in
consultation with CDFW. Mitigation methods may
include passive relocation conducted outside of the
owl breeding season (between September 1 and
February 28). If an active owl burrow is identified, and construction is to proceed, then a qualified biologist
(with two or more years of burrowing owl experience)
can establish an appropriate disturbance-limit buffer
around the burrow using flagging or staking.

Construction activities shall not occur within any
buffer zones until the burrow is deemed inactive by
the qualified biologist.

First survey
between 30 and 14
days before initial
ground
disturbance, and
second survey no
more than 24 hours
prior to initial
ground disturbance
Project Proponent;
Biologist
City of Redlands
BIO-2: If construction or other Project activities are
scheduled to occur during the nesting bird season
No more than 3
days prior to initial Project Proponent;
Avian Biologist
City of Redlands
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 348 of 1131 Mitigation Measures No. /
Implementing Action
Implementation
Timing
Party Responsible
for Implementation
Party Responsible for
Monitoring Date of Completion/Notes
(February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction
nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified
avian biologist to ensure that active bird nests will not be disturbed or destroyed. The survey shall be
completed no more than three days prior to initial
ground disturbance. The nesting bird survey shall
include the Project Site and adjacent areas where
Project activities have the potential to affect active
nests, either directly or indirectly, due to construction activity, noise, human activity, or ground disturbance.

If an active nest is identified, a qualified avian
biologist shall establish an appropriately sized nondisturbance buffer around the nest using flagging or staking. Construction activities shall not occur within any non-disturbance buffer zones until the nest is
deemed inactive by the qualified avian biologist. If
initial ground-disturbing activities are scheduled to
occur during the nesting bird season, then a biological monitor shall be present during all vegetation removal
activities to ensure no impacts to nesting birds occur. ground disturbance
if during nesting
bird season.

Cultural Resources
CR-1: If subsurface deposits believed to be cultural or human in origin are discovered during construction, all work must halt within a 100-foot radius of the discovery.

A qualified professional archaeologist, meeting the
Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification
Standards for precontact and historic archaeologist,
shall be retained to evaluate the significance of the find, and shall have the authority to modify the no-work
radius as appropriate, using professional judgment. The following notifications shall apply, depending on the
nature of the find:

If the professional archaeologist determines that the
find does not represent a cultural resource, work may
resume immediately, and no agency notifications are
required.
•If the professional archaeologist determines that the
find does represent a cultural resource from any time
period or cultural affiliation, the archaeologist shall immediately notify the lead federal agency, the lead
CEQA agency, and applicable landowner. The
Upon discovery of
cultural resources
Project Proponent;
Archaeological
Monitor
City of Redlands
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 349 of 1131 Mitigation Measures No. /
Implementing Action
Implementation
Timing
Party Responsible
for Implementation
Party Responsible for
Monitoring Date of Completion/Notes
agencies shall consult on a finding of eligibility and
implement appropriate treatment measures, if the find
is determined to be a Historical Resource under
CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA
Guidelines or a Historic Property under Section 106
NHPA, if applicable. Work may not resume within the
no-work radius until the lead agencies, through
consultation as appropriate, determine that the site
either: 1) is not a Historical Resource under CEQA, as
defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines
or a Historic Property under Section 106; or 2) that
the treatment measures have been completed to their
satisfaction.
•The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural
Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted,
as detailed within TCR-1 below, regarding any precontact and/or historic-era finds and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her
initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to
provide Tribal input with regards to significance and
treatment.
•If significant pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015),
are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the
archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment
Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within TCR-1. The
archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly.

CR-2: If human remains or funerary objects are
encountered during any activities associated with the
project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease. The archaeologist shall notify the San Bernardino County Coroner (per § 7050.5
of the Health and Safety Code). The provisions of §
7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, §
5097.98 of the California PRC, and AB 2641 will be
implemented. If the Coroner determines the remains are
Native American and not the result of a crime scene, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC), which then will designate a Native
American Most Likely Descendant (MLD) (§ 5097.98 of
Upon discovery of
human remains or
funerary objects
Archaeological
Monitor
City of Redlands
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 350 of 1131 Mitigation Measures No. /
Implementing Action
Implementation
Timing
Party Responsible
for Implementation
Party Responsible for
Monitoring Date of Completion/Notes
the PRC). The designated MLD will have 48 hours from
the time access to the property is granted to make
recommendations concerning treatment of the remains.

If the landowner does not agree with the
recommendations of the MLD, the NAHC can mediate
(§ 5097.94 of the PRC). If no agreement is reached, the landowner must rebury the remains where they will not
be further disturbed (§ 5097.98 of the PRC). This will
also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center; using an open
space or conservation zoning designation or easement;
or recording a reinternment document with the county in which the property is located (AB 2641). Work may not
resume within the no-work radius until the lead
agencies, through consultation as appropriate,
determine that the treatment measures have been
completed to their satisfaction.

Geology and Soils
GEO-1: Establish a procedure for the management of
paleontological materials found on-site during a
development, including the following provisions:
•If materials are found on-site during grading, require that work be halted until a qualified professional
evaluates the find to determine if it represents a
significant paleontological resource.
•If the resource is determined to be significant, the
paleontologist shall supervise removal of the material
and determine the most appropriate archival storage of
the material.
•Appropriate materials shall be prepared, catalogued,
and archived at the applicant’s expense and shall be
retained within San Bernardino County if feasible.

Upon discovery of
paleontological
resources
Project Proponent;
Paleontological
Monitor
City of Redlands
Tribal Cultural Resources
TCR-1: The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians
Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be
contacted, as detailed in CR-1, of any pre-contact
and/or historic-era cultural resources discovered
during project implementation, and be provided
Upon discovery of
cultural resources
Project Proponent;
Archeological
Monitor represented
by SMBMI
City of Redlands
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 351 of 1131 Mitigation Measures No. /
Implementing Action
Implementation
Timing
Party Responsible
for Implementation
Party Responsible for
Monitoring Date of Completion/Notes
information regarding the nature of the find, so as to
provide Tribal input with regards to significance and
treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as
defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural
resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be
created by the archaeologist, in coordination with
SMBMI, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to
this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be
present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of
the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor
on-site.

TCR-2: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents
created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for
dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or
applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI
throughout the life of the project.

Upon completion of
archaeological/cult
ural documents
Project Proponent;
Archeological
Monitor represented
by SMBMI
City of Redlands
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 352 of 1131 -1-
I:\cmo\Resolutions\8402_MND Self Storage.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 8402

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS

ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND THE

RELATED MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PROGRAM FOR
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1168 (SELF-STORAGE PROJECT) AND STREET VACATION NO. 186 FOR A PROJECT SITE LOCATED ON THE

SOUTH SIDE OF NAPLES AVENUE BETWEEN WABASH AND JASPER
AVENUES, AND ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT NO. 363 TO AMEND
CHAPTER 18.96 OF THE REDLANDS MUNICIPAL CODE.

WHEREAS, Madison Capital Group (“Applicant”), has filed an application for Ordinance Text Amendment No. 363 to add “Self-Storage or mini-storage facilities on a project site a minimum size of five (5) acres” as a use that requires a Conditional Use Permit in the C-4 district, Street Vacation No. 186 proposing to vacate three (3) feet of roadway on Jasper Avenue, and Conditional Use Permit No. 1168 to construct a 123,456 square-foot self-storage facility consisting of 11 detached buildings that will contain 835 storage units and a 700 square foot leasing office with related site improvements including parking lot, walls and fences, landscape, and lighting on a 6.34-acre parcel. The project site is located on the south side of Naples Avenue between Wabash Avenue and Jasper Avenue in the Highway Commercial (C-4) District (APN:
0298-051-07-0000); and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared for the Project and circulated for public review for a period of thirty days beginning on August 18, 2022, through September 19, 2022; and WHEREAS on September 23, 2022, notice of the Planning Commission’s public hearing for the Project and the related Project Entitlements was published in the Redlands Daily Facts; and
WHEREAS, on October 5, 2022, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or in opposition to, the Project, and at which the Planning Commission considered the Project; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted; and WHEREAS, the Mitigated Negative Declaration and related materials for the Project that were reviewed by the City of Redlands Planning Commission in making its recommendation for approval have been forwarded to the City Council; and
WHEREAS on October 21, 2022, notice of the City Council’s public hearing for the proposed Project was published in the Redlands Daily Facts by the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on November 15, 2022, at which interested persons had the opportunity to provide verbal and written testimony on the Project and proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 353 of 1131 -2-
I:\cmo\Resolutions\8402_MND Self Storage.doc

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. CEQA Compliance. As the decision-making body for the Project, the City has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Initial Study, related technical studies and analyses, public comments received, the Response to Comments, and supporting documentation. The City determines that the Initial Study and related documents contain a complete and accurate reporting of the environmental impacts and mitigation measures associated with the Project. The City finds that the Initial Study was prepared in compliance with CEQA, and that the City complied with CEQA’s procedural and substantive requirements.

SECTION 2. Independent Judgment of Lead Agency. The Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project, prepared by the City’s environmental consultant, reflects the City’s independent judgment and analysis. The City has exercised independent judgment and analysis in accordance with Public Resources Code section 21082.1(c)(3) in managing as appropriate the environmental consultant, and directing the consultant in the preparation of the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City has independently reviewed and analyzed the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and accompanying technical studies/reports, and finds that the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City of Redlands.

SECTION 3. Adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration. The City Council of the City of Redlands finds on the basis of the whole record that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment, including mitigation measures and any project design features, and hereby adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Project.

SECTION 4. Adoption of Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program. Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21081.6, the City of Redlands as the Lead Agency hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program attached to the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and all mitigation measures are included as Conditions of Approval on the Project.

SECTION 5. Custodian of Records. The custodian of documents and other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based is the Development Services Director or designee, and all records are located in the City of Redlands Development Services Department.

SECTION 6. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon adoption.

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 15
th day of November, 2022.
______________________________
Paul T. Barich, Mayor
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 354 of 1131 -3-
I:\cmo\Resolutions\8402_MND Self Storage.doc
ATTEST:
______________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15 th
day of November, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 355 of 1131 1 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8403_Intent_to_Vacate_Self Storage.docx RESOLUTION NO.
8403

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS

DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE THE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY

LOCATED AT JASPER AVENUE (CITY OF REDLANDS STREET
VACATION NO. 186)
WHEREAS, Madison Capital Group (“Applicant”), has filed an application for Ordinance Text Amendment No. 363 to add “Self-Storage or mini-storage facilities on a project site a minimum size of five (5) acres” as a use that requires a Conditional Use Permit in the C4 district, Street Vacation No. 186 proposing to vacate roadway along Jasper Avenue approximately four hundred and four (404) feet in length by three (3) feet in width, and Conditional Use Permit No. 1168 to construct a 123,456 square foot storage facility consisting of 11 detached buildings that will contain 835 storage units and a 700 square foot leasing office with related site improvements including parking lot, walls and fences, landscape, and lighting on a 6.34-acre parcel. The project site is located on the south side of Naples Avenue between Wabash Avenue and Jasper Avenue in the Highway Commercial (C-4) District (APN: 0298- 051-07-0000); and
WHEREAS, the City is authorized to vacate all or part of a public street pursuant to California Streets and Highway Code section 8300 et seq.; and WHEREAS, pursuant to section 8340 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the City may, for public convenience and necessity, reserve and except public service easements from a street vacation; and
WHEREAS, at its meeting on October 5, 2022, the City’s Planning Commission made its report to the City Council that the proposed street vacation will conform to the City’s General Plan; and
WHEREAS, The City Council adopted Resolution No. 8402 on November 15, 2022 for the proposed project and determined a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental determination for the project; and
WHEREAS, the City Council intends to vacate the excess right-of-way, as more particularly described in Exhibits “A” and “B” to this resolution;

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. The City Council hereby declares its intention to vacate the right-of way roadway along Jasper Avenue approximately four hundred and four (404) feet in length by three (3) feet in width adjacent to APN 0298-051-07-0000, and as described in Exhibits “A” and “B,” Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 356 of 1131 2 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8403_Intent_to_Vacate_Self Storage.docx which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 8402 on November 15, 2022 for the proposed project and determined a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental determination for the project.

Section 3. The City Council will conduct a public hearing on the proposed street vacation at a regularly scheduled public meeting of the City Council on December 20, 2022, beginning at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to be held in the City Council Chambers located at 35 Cajon Street, Suite 2, Redlands, California 92373.

Section 4. The City Clark shall give notice of the public hearing on the public hearing on the proposed vacation by:

A. Publishing notice in a newspaper of general circulation, for two successive weeks prior to the hearing; and
B. Posting notices of the proposed street vacation conspicuously at Jasper Avenue at least two weeks prior to the date set for the public hearing. The notices shall be posted no more than 300 feet apart, and at least three such notices shall be posted.

The notices shall reference the adoption of this Resolution of Intention and shallstate the date, time, and place of the street vacation hearing.

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 15th day of November, 2022.

Paul T. Barich, Mayor
ATTEST:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 357 of 1131 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8403_Intent_to_Vacate_Self Storage.docx3 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8403_Intent_to_Vacate_Self Storage.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of November, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 358 of 1131 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8403_Intent_to_Vacate_Self Storage.docx4 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8403_Intent_to_Vacate_Self Storage.docx Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 359 of 1131 5 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8403_Intent_to_Vacate_Self Storage.docx Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 360 of 1131 1 I:\cmo\Ordinances\2951 Ordinance Amending Chap 18.96.docx ORDINANCE NO. 2951

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AMENDING CHAPTER

18.96 OF THE REDLANDS MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 18.96.070,

RELATING TO THE LIST OF CONDITIONAL USES ALLOWED IN THE HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT.

WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2951 (Ordinance Text Amendment No. 363) would amend Chapter 18.96 of Title 18 (the City’s “Zoning Ordinance”) of the Redlands Municipal Code to permit self-storage facilities as a conditional use subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit if located within the C-4, Highway Commercial district and located on a project site a minimum of five acres in size; and
WHEREAS, on October 5, 2022, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to, Ordinance Text Amendment No. 363 and at which the Planning Commission considered Ordinance Text Amendment No. 363; and
WHEREAS, approval of Ordinance No. 2951 underwent environmental review in accordance with the State Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act, an Initial Study was circulated for public review and comment, there is no evidence of any potentially significant impacts, and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the recommended environmental determination; and
WHEREAS, following the public hearing on October 5, 2022, the Planning Commission determined that Ordinance Text Amendment No. 363 would be in conformity with the 2035 General Plan, and would be consistent with goals of the General Plan for retail/commercial land use districts; and,
WHEREAS, on October 5, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that proposed Ordinance No. 2951 be approved; and WHEREAS, in accordance with Government Code section 65090, on or about October 21, 2022, the City Clerk gave notice by publication in a newspaper of general circulation of the holding of a public hearing at which Ordinance No. 2951 would be considered by City Council; and WHEREAS, on November 15, 2022, the City Council held a noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to, Ordinance No. 2951.

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Approval of Ordinance Text Amendment No. 363. Redlands Municipal Code Section 18.96.070, entitled “Conditional Uses,” is hereby amended to read as follows:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 361 of 1131 2 I:\cmo\Ordinances\2951 Ordinance Amending Chap 18.96.docx “18.96.070: CONDITIONAL USES:

The following uses may be permitted in the C-4 zone subject to approval of a conditional use permit:

Uses permitted with a conditional use permit in the C-3 zone.

Uses listed in chapter 18.192 of this title.

Ambulance service.

Animal hospitals.

Drive-in stores, such as milk and food, with alcohol beverage sales.

Massage establishment in accordance with title 5, chapter 5.28 of this code.

Personal services in accordance with title 5, chapter 5.28 of this code.

Self-storage or mini-storage facilities on a project site with a minimum size of five acres.

Service stations with alcohol beverage sales; all merchandise must be displayed within the building or under canopy cover.

Tire recapping in conjunction with sales (not more than 3 molds).” Section 2. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, and thereafter, this ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.
_________________________________
Paul T. Barich, Mayor
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 362 of 1131 3 I:\cmo\Ordinances\2951 Ordinance Amending Chap 18.96.docx ATTEST:
____________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council at the regular meeting thereof, held on the ______ day of __________________, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 363 of 1131 1 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx
RESOLUTION NO. 8404

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1168 FOR THE

DEVELOPMENT OF A SELF-STORAGE FACILITY INCLUDING ELEVEN

STORAGE BUILDINGS, LEASING OFFICE, PARKING LOT, LANDSCAPE,

LIGHTING, AND RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS, LOCATED ON THE

SOUTH SIDE OF NAPLES AVENUE BETWEEN WABASH AVENUE AND
JASPER AVENUE.

WHEREAS, Madison Capital Group (“Applicant”), has filed an application for Ordinance Text Amendment No. 363 to add “Self-Storage or mini-storage facilities on a project site a minimum size of five (5) acres” as a use that requires a Conditional Use Permit in the C-4 district, Street Vacation No. 186 proposing to vacate a portion of Jasper Avenue approximately four hundred and four (404) feet in length and three (3) feet in width, and Conditional Use Permit No. 1168 to construct a 123,456 square foot storage facility consisting of 11 detached buildings that will contain 835 storage units and a 700 square foot leasing office with related site improvements including parking lot, walls and fences, landscape, and lighting on a 6.34-acre parcel. The project site is located on the south side of Naples Avenue between Wabash Avenue and Jasper Avenue in the Highway Commercial (C-4) District (APN: 0298-051-07-0000); and WHEREAS on September 23, 2022, notice of the Planning Commission’s public hearing for the Project and the related Project Entitlements was published in the Redlands Daily Facts; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2022, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or in opposition to, the Project, and at which the Planning Commission considered the Project; and WHEREAS, on October 5, 2022, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that Conditional Use Permit No. 1168 be approved for the Project; and WHEREAS on October 21, 2022, notice of the City Council’s public hearing for the proposed Project was published in the Redlands Daily Facts by the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on November 15, 2022, at which interested persons had the opportunity to provide verbal and written testimony on the Project and Commission Review & Approval No. 1168.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATON. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 8402 on November 15, 2022, for the proposed project and a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental determination for the project.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 364 of 1131 2 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx
SECTION 2. FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1168. The City Council hereby approves Conditional Use Permit No. 1168 based upon the following findings, and subject to the Conditions of Approval from the Development Services Department (Exhibit “A”) and the Land Use Engineering Division (Exhibit “B”) attached hereto.

1. That the proposed development will not adversely affect the applicable land use plans of the city.

The proposed self-storage facility will not adversely affect the applicable land use plans of the City. The proposed buildings were designed in compliance with the City’s General Plan land use policies as well as the development standards of the Highway Commercial District. As such, the operation of the proposed self-storage facility with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit will be in conformance with the land use plans of the City.

2. That the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare.

The proposed self-storage facility will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare. Conditions of Approval have been attached to Conditional Use Permit No. 1168 to ensure that there will be no detrimental effects to public health, safety, and welfare. The self-storage facility will operate within a zoning district developed to accommodate a variety of commercial uses. The site will provide sufficient on-site parking for customers and employees. Therefore, the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare.

3. That the proposed development will comply to the maximum extent feasible with the regulations of the city's general plan, the applicable zoning district and the city's development standards.

The proposed self-storage facility complies with the regulations of the City’s General Plan.

With the adoption of Ordinance Text Amendment No. 363, the proposed project will be in compliance with the Highway Commercial Zoning District, in that the proposed amended language of the zoning district would allow “Self-Storage or mini-storage facilities on a project site a minimum size of five (5) acres” as a use that requires a Conditional Use Permit in the district. In addition, the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use.

4. That the proposed development is appropriate at the proposed location.

The proposed self-storage facility is appropriate for the subject location, as the site is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use. The proposed use will provide a needed service to local residents and is conveniently located on a major commercial corridor. The project has been reviewed for compliance with the applicable development standards of the Highway Commercial Zoning District and the buildings were designed with an architectural theme that is consistent with the City’s Architectural Review Criteria. On-site parking will also be sufficient to accommodate the proposed use.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 365 of 1131 3 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption.

ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this 15th day of November, 2022.

______________________________
Paul T. Barich, Mayor
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 366 of 1131 4 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx
ATTEST:
______________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of November, 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:
______________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 367 of 1131 5 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx

EXHIBIT A

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Development Services Department
Conditional Use Permit No. 1168

1. This approval is for Conditional Use Permit No. 1168 to construct a self-storage facility consisting of eleven buildings totaling 123,456 square feet with 835 storage units a 700 square foot leasing office and related site improvements including parking lot, driveways, walls and fences, landscape, basins and lighting on a 6.34-acre parcel. The project site is located south of Naples Avenue, east of Wabash Avenue and west of Jasper Avenue in the Highway Commercial (C-4) Zoning District (APN: 0298-051-07).

2. The issuance of any permits shall comply with all provisions of the Redlands Municipal Code.

3. Unless construction has commenced pursuant to the issuance of a building permit, or a time extension is granted in accordance with the Redlands Municipal Code, this approval shall expire two (2) years from the date of Planning Commission approval.

4. The issuance of any permits shall comply with all provisions of the Redlands California Fire Code currently in effect.

5. All plans submitted to the City shall reflect the Planning Commission approval and any other changes required by the Commission and/or staff. This condition applies to the site plan, landscape plans, building elevations and materials, and all other illustrations, text, or plans submitted to the City in connection with this project.

6. The applicant shall not make any modifications or changes during construction that are in conflict or contrary to the project’s approved site design, grading plan, landscaping plan, or building elevations without first consulting with the Development Services Director or designee.

7. A copy of the approved Conditions of Approval shall be included on the cover page of the construction plans submitted to the Building Division.

8. No Certificate of Occupancy shall be granted until all conditions of approval have been satisfied.

9. Prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, Street Vacation No. 186 must be approved by the City Council.

10. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d), certain fees, dedications, reservations or exactions imposed by the City as a condition of approval of this project are subject to a statutory ninety (90) day protest period. Please be advised that the ninety (90) day protest period for those fees, dedications, reservations and exactions which are subject to Government Code Section 66020(a) has commenced to run on the date this project was Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 368 of 1131 6 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx
approved by the City.

11. The property owner and applicant and their successors and assigns, shall defend, by paying for the defense costs of the City of Redlands (for counsel retained by 7 the City), indemnify and hold harmless the City of Redlands, and its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, from and against any and all claims, actions, and proceedings (collectively “Claims”) to attack, set aside, void or annul the approval of this Conditional Use Permit by the City, or Claims brought against the City due to acts or omissions in any way connected to the applicant’s project that is the subject of this permit. This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages, fees, costs, liabilities, and expenses incurred in such actions or proceedings, including damages for the injury to property or persons, including death of a person, and any award of costs or attorneys’ fees. In the event any such action is commenced to attack, set aside, void or annul all, or any, provisions of this permit, or is commenced for any other reason against the City for acts or omissions relating to the applicant’s project, within fourteen (14) City business days following notice of such action from the City, the applicant shall file with the City a performance bond or irrevocable letter of credit, or other form of security satisfactory to the City (the “Security”) in a form satisfactory to the City, and in the amount of $300,000, to ensure applicant’s performance of its defense and indemnity obligations under this condition. The Security amount shall not limit the total indemnity obligation of the applicant pursuant to this condition. The failure of the applicant to provide the Security shall be deemed an express acknowledgement and agreement by the applicant that the City shall have the authority and right, without objection by the applicant, to revoke all entitlements granted for the project pursuant to this permit. The City shall have no liability to the applicant for the exercise of City’s right to revoke this permit.

12. Plans submitted by Developer with building permit applications shall show on the building elevation sheets all exterior building materials and colors, including product and finish manufacturer name, color name and number, and surface finish type (such as: stucco with sand finish, plaster with smooth finish) to be used in construction.

13. All on-site utilities shall be placed underground except power poles for lines over 66 KV.

Plans shall be submitted that detail the undergrounding of all on-site utilities, subject to review and approval by the Development Services Director, prior to issuance of building permits.

14. Transformer cabinets and commercial gas meters shall not be located within required setbacks and shall be screened from public view either by architectural treatment or with landscaping. Multiple electrical meters and panels shall be fully enclosed and incorporated into the overall architectural design of the building(s). Backflow preventers shall be enclosed with landscaping that will provide complete screening upon maturity. The location and method of enclosure or screening of this equipment shall be shown on the construction plans and landscape plans prior to building permit issuance. Location of said equipment shall be coordinated with appropriate utility company (e.g., Southern California Gas Company or Southern California Edison Company). The applicant shall submit plans showing details of screening subject to review and approval by the Development Services Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 369 of 1131 7 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx
Director, prior to issuance of building permits.

15. Ground mounted equipment shall be screened from public view on all sides subject to review and approval by the Development Services Director, prior to issuance of building permits.

16. During the plan check review process, the Developer shall provide a lighting plan that provides design details (light standards, bollards, wall mounted packs, etc.) and illumination site information within pathways, streetscapes, and open spaces proposed throughout the development. An electrical engineer shall prepare the site lighting and/or photometric plan demonstrating that adequate lighting ranges will be provided throughout the development without creating light spillover, light pollution, or conflicts with surrounding factors such as tree locations, off-site or adjacent lighting. The illumination within the parking lot shall be a minimum of 0.5-foot candle and illumination along all property lines of the project site shall not exceed 0.5-foot candle. Walkway lighting shall have a maximum height of 12 feet and all parking lot lighting shall have a maximum height of 30 feet.

17. Plans submitted for plan check shall include an exterior lighting plan, including fixture and pole designs, for review and approval by the Development Services Director or designee.

18. All lighting shall be shielded, and no light or glare shall impact the surrounding properties.

19. Prior to issuance of building permits, Developer shall demonstrate that light standards will not conflict with tree locations. Developer shall submit a plan showing both the lighting and landscape on the same sheet.

20. All landscaped areas noted on the site plan shall be permanently maintained with healthy planting material, and whenever necessary shall be replanted with suitable vegetation.

21. Landscape and Irrigation Plans shall provide water use calculations on the submitted plans, and Developer shall demonstrate compliance with the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance prior to permit issuance. The plans shall be prepared by a California-licensed landscape architect.

22. The Final Landscape Plans shall incorporate the following:
a. The landscape plan shall comply with all requirements for landscaping in pursuant to the Redlands Municipal Code.
b. The landscape plans shall be detailed and show the specific distribution, size, and amount of each species of trees, shrubs, and groundcover; c. All plant material shall be sized so that the landscaping has an attractive appearance at the time of installation and a mature appearance within three (3) years; Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 370 of 1131 8 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx
d. An automatic irrigation system shall be utilized to irrigate the site’s approved landscape design;
e. Landscaped berms, or a combination of berms, landscaping and/or wall treatments of sufficient height to substantially screen parking areas shall be provided between parking areas and right of way.

23. The landscape architect responsible for the design of the project’s landscape plan shall review and certify, prior to a request by the applicant for a final occupancy inspection, that the installed landscaping meets the specifications of the approved landscape plan, except
as modified in the conditions of approval.

24. Before placing or constructing any signs on the project property, Developer shall obtain a sign permit from the City. Sign locations and illumination are subject to review and approval
by the Planning Division under separate permit.

25. Glazing or image reflective surfaces (specular reflectance), such as the glazing on windows,
shall be limited to a maximum reflectance value of twenty five percent (25%). “Specular reflectance” means any mirror like reflection, as contrasted to diffused reflection from such surfaces as concrete or vegetation.

26. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit plans detailing that roof screening is of adequate height to screen any roof-top equipment from public view on all sides, subject to review and approval by the Development Services Director. Screening of air
conditioning units and other equipment on the buildings shall be incorporated into or compatible with the architectural design of the buildings. All equipment shall be screened from public view of adjacent roadways and freeways.

27. Ground mounted equipment shall be screened from public view on all sides subject to review
and approval by the Development Services Director, prior to issuance of building permits.

28. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall be required to obtain approval of a construction site safety plan by the Redlands Police Department providing adequate security measures such as lights, video cameras, vehicle transponders, locks, alarms, trained security personnel, fencing etc. The nature of the measures will depend on the specific requirements of the site and may vary with the different stages of construction.

The applicant shall be responsible for the compliance of all sub-contractors working on the site.

29. The project site shall be kept in a weed and dust free condition throughout all periods of Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 371 of 1131 9 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx
development.

CEQA Mitigation Measures

30. BIO-1: Preconstruction surveys for burrowing owl shall be conducted. The surveys shall follow the methods described in the California Department of Fish & Wildlife’s (CDFW) Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Game [CDFG] 2012). Two surveys shall be conducted, with the first survey being scheduled between 30 and 14 days before initial ground disturbance (grading, grubbing, and construction), and the second survey being conducted no more than 24 hours prior to initial ground disturbance. If burrowing owls and/or suitable burrowing owl burrows are identified on the Project Site during the survey, the Project Proponent shall consult with CDFW and follow the methods listed in the CDFW’s Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (CDFG 2012) for avoidance and/or passive relocation. If burrowing owls or suitable burrowing owl burrows with sign (e.g., whitewash, pellets, feathers, prey remains) are identified on the Project Site during the survey, these features must be completely avoided. If impacts to those features are unavoidable, then the Project Proponent must also develop an owl mitigation plan in consultation with CDFW. Mitigation methods may include passive relocation conducted outside of the owl breeding season (between September 1 and February 28). If an active owl burrow is identified, and construction is to proceed, then a qualified biologist (with two or more years of burrowing owl experience) can establish an appropriate disturbance-limit buffer around the burrow using flagging or staking. Construction activities shall not occur within any buffer zones until the burrow is deemed inactive by the qualified biologist.

31. BIO-2: If construction or other Project activities are scheduled to occur during the nesting bird season (February 1 through August 31), a preconstruction nesting bird survey shall be conducted by a qualified avian biologist to ensure that active bird nests will not be disturbed or destroyed. The survey shall be completed no more than three days prior to initial ground disturbance. The nesting bird survey shall include the Project Site and adjacent areas where Project activities have the potential to affect active nests, either directly or indirectly, due to construction activity, noise, human activity, or ground disturbance. If an active nest is identified, a qualified avian biologist shall establish an appropriately sized non-disturbance buffer around the nest using flagging or staking. Construction activities shall not occur within any non-disturbance buffer zones until the nest is deemed inactive by the qualified avian biologist. If initial ground-disturbing activities are scheduled to occur during the nesting bird season, then a biological monitor shall be present during all vegetation removal activities to ensure no impacts to nesting birds occur.

32. CR-1: If subsurface deposits believed to be cultural or human in origin are discovered during construction, all work must halt within a 100-foot radius of the discovery. A qualified professional archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for precontact and historic archaeologist, shall be retained to evaluate the significance of the find, and shall have the authority to modify the no-work radius as appropriate, using professional judgment. The following notifications shall apply, depending on the nature of the find:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 372 of 1131 10 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx
a. If the professional archaeologist determines that the find does not represent a cultural resource, work may resume immediately, and no agency notifications are required.
b. If the professional archaeologist determines that the find does represent a cultural resource from any time period or cultural affiliation, the archaeologist shall immediately notify the lead federal agency, the lead CEQA agency, and applicable landowner. The agencies shall consult on a finding of eligibility and implement appropriate treatment measures, if the find is determined to be a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines or a Historic Property under Section 106 NHPA, if applicable. Work may not resume within the no-work radius until the lead agencies, through consultation as appropriate, determine that the site either: 1) is not a Historical Resource under CEQA, as defined in Section 15064.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines or a Historic Property under Section 106; or 2) that the treatment measures have been completed to their satisfaction.
c. The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed within TCR-1 below, regarding any precontact and/or historic-era finds and be provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment.
d. If significant pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the archaeologist shall develop a Monitoring and Treatment Plan, the drafts of which shall be provided to SMBMI for review and comment, as detailed within TCR-1.

The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the project and implement the Plan accordingly.

33. CR-2: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease. The archaeologist shall notify the San Bernardino County Coroner (per § 7050.5 of the Health and Safety Code). The provisions of § 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, § 5097.98 of the California PRC, and AB 2641 will be implemented. If the Coroner determines the remains are Native American and not the result of a crime scene, the Coroner will notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), which then will designate a Native American Most Likely Descendant (MLD) (§ 5097.98 of the PRC). The designated MLD will have 48 hours from the time access to the property is granted to make recommendations concerning treatment of the remains. If the landowner does not agree with the recommendations of the MLD, the NAHC can mediate (§ 5097.94 of the PRC). If no agreement is reached, the landowner must rebury the remains where they will not be further disturbed (§ 5097.98 of the PRC). This will also include either recording the site with the NAHC or the appropriate Information Center; using an open space or conservation zoning designation or easement; or recording a reinternment document with the county in which the property is located (AB 2641). Work may not resume within the no-work radius until the lead agencies, through consultation as appropriate, determine that the treatment measures have been completed to their Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 373 of 1131 11 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx
satisfaction.

34. GEO-1: Establish a procedure for the management of paleontological materials found onsite during a development, including the following provisions:
a. If materials are found on-site during grading, require that work be halted until a qualified professional evaluates the find to determine if it represents a significant paleontological resource.
b. If the resource is determined to be significant, the paleontologist shall supervise removal of the material and determine the most appropriate archival storage of the material.
c. Appropriate materials shall be prepared, catalogued, and archived at the applicant’s expense and shall be retained within San Bernardino County if feasible.

34. TCR-1: The San Manuel Band of Mission Indians Cultural Resources Department (SMBMI) shall be contacted, as detailed in CR-1, of any pre-contact and/or historic-era cultural resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a cultural resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with SMBMI, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents SMBMI for the remainder of the project, should SMBMI elect to place a monitor on-site.

35. TCR-2: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to SMBMI. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with SMBMI throughout the life of the project.

Police Department

35. Provide a Safety and Security Program including cameras.

Facilities & Community Services

36. A recycling plan may be required if demolition and construction activity is occurring, pursuant to RMC 13.66.020.

37. Street trees may be required. If street trees are required, the City maintains a list of acceptable trees by species, by street name, and by tree district, pursuant to RMC 12.52.050.

38. A commercial recycle bin may be required, the City maintains a standard drawing for placement and dimensions, pursuant to RMC 13.64.150.

39. Automated containers will be required in lieu of solid waste dumpster containers for office use. Automated containers shall be placed at curbside for service on scheduled day and stored on property, pursuant to RMC 13.64.220.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 374 of 1131 12 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx
Building and Safety

40. Proposed project shall comply with all current building codes Title 24 Parts 1-12.

Other Departments

41. Conditions of Approval from the following City Departments/Divisions are applicable to the project, and are hereby incorporated by reference:
a. Land Use Engineering Division (Exhibit B)
End of Conditions of Approval
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 375 of 1131 13 I:\cmo\Resolutions\8404 Self Storage CUP_1168.docx

EXHIBIT B

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Land Use Engineering Division
[ Attached ]
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 376 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 377 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 378 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 379 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 380 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 381 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 382 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 383 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 384 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 385 of 1131 City Council Meeting K. 3.

DATE: 11/15/2022
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to consider Ordinance No. 2946 amending Chapter

10.24 of the Redlands Municipal Code relating to the establishment of prima facie speed limits on various streets throughout the City of Redlands and determination that adoption of the ordinance is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director Harris)
(Mayor to declare the meeting open as a public hearing) PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC HEARING:

1. Mayor declares the meeting open as a public hearing.

2. Mayor calls upon Department Director for report.

3. Mayor calls for questions/comments from members of the City Council.

Mayor calls for comments/questions/testimony from members of the public (3 minutes per speaker).

4. 5. Mayor calls upon City Clerk to note any written comments received.

6. Mayor closes the public hearing.

7. City Council considers the motion and votes.

MOTION(S):

If City Council determines the staff recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

Mayor requests the City Clerk to read the title of Ordinance No. 2946; I move to waive further reading of Ordinance No. 2946 and to introduce Ordinance No. 2946, and further find that the Ordinance is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Sections 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 386 of 1131 RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that City Council adopt Ordinance No. 2946 to amend Chapter 10.24 of the Redlands Municipal Code and determine that adoption of the Ordinance is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act.

DISCUSSION:

The Municipal Utilities and Engineering Department (MUED) staff periodically prepares engineering and traffic surveys in accordance with California Vehicle Code (CVC) and California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD) standards. The surveys are completed at seven to fourteen (7-14) year intervals and are necessary for Redlands Police Department(RPD) Officers to issue citations for speed limit violations when electronic speed measuring equipment is used. The surveys determine the 85th percentile speed of free-flowing using actual measured vehicle speeds within a street corridor. The transportation engineering industry recognizes the 85th percentile methodology for establishing speed limits as an accurate indicator of a reasonable and safe vehicle speed. This methodology is founded on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of vehicle operators within a street corridor. Speed limits that are established based on this methodology reduce the variance in vehicle speeds. The CAMUTCD allows the City Engineer discretion to adjust the 85 th percentile speed up or down by five (5) miles per hour in consideration of physical or environmental conditions that may impact vehicle operator behavior.

In accordance with the CVC, MUED staff contracted with RK Engineering Group, Inc (RK) to perform traffic surveys on various street segments throughout the City of Redlands. The recommended speed limits identified in the RK summary report titled "2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey" (2021 E&TS) was approved by the Traffic and Parking Commission on March 2, 2022 and was accepted by City Council on June 7, 2022 with adoption of Resolution No. 8348. Similar Reports were created in 2009 and 2015. Although the 2009 report recommended increasing the speed limit on Alta Vista Drive between Florida Street and Sunset Drive from 35 mph to 40 mph, City Council directed staff to retain the lower speed limit with adoption of Resolution 6914. In order to prevent legal conflicts for RPD Officers, the posted speed limit within this corridor has not been enforced since then.

The 2021 E&TS identified an 85th percentile speed of 47 mph within this segment of Alta Vista Drive, which was initially rounded down to 45 mph in accordance with the CAMUTCD. In consideration of the horizontal and vertical street geometry and after speaking with concerned residents living near the corridor, the City Engineer elected to reduce the recommended speed limit by 5 mph to 40 mph. City Council adoption of Ordinance 2946 will result in a 40 mph Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 387 of 1131 mph to 40 mph. City Council adoption of Ordinance 2946 will result in a 40 mph posted speed limit within this corridor. The City Engineer evaluated all recommendations in the 2021 E&TS and recommends two (2) additional speed limit reductions. The first of these is the segment of Barton Road between Alabama Street and Lakeside Avenue which the City Engineer recommends posting at 40 mph rather than 45 mph as recommended by the 2021 E&TS. This provides a more gradual speed limit reduction for motor vehicle operators entering Redlands from the City of Loma Linda. The City Engineer also recommends posting a 35 mph speed limit along the segment of Colton Avenue between Church Street and Grove Street due to the presence of Franklin Elementary School and the University of Redlands within the corridor. A school speed reduction zone is located near Church Street and several pedestrian crosswalks are located in and around the University of Redlands campus. In each case, the City Engineer's recommendation complies with CAMUTCD and CVC standards. The 2021 E&TS has been updated to reflect these recommendations.

Adoption of Ordinance 2946 is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State’s Guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act as there is no possibility that this action will result in an impact on the environment.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may deny the staff recommendation and provide alternate direction.

SUBMITTED BY:

John R. Harris, Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Christopher R. Catren, Chief of Police
Rich Sessler, Fire Chief
Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
Goutam K. Dobey, City Engineer
PREPARED BY:

Johana Silva, Assistant Engineer
Fiscal Impact
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 388 of 1131 Fiscal Year: FY 22/23
Appropriation Required Y/N: No
Budgeted Y/N: Yes
Account No.: 101401
Discussion:

There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. Funding for street sign replacements is included in the MUED FY 22/23 approved budget.

Attachments
A. Ordinance 2946 (Clean)
B. Ordinance 2946 (Legislative)
C. Public Notice
D. Reso 8348 (Reference only)
E. 2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 389 of 1131 1 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits - Clean.docx ORDINANCE NO. 2946

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AMENDING CHAPTER

10.24 OF THE REDLANDS MUNICIPAL CODE CONFIRMING PRIMA

FACIA SPEED LIMITS FOR SPECIFIED CITY STREETS
WHEREAS, an Engineering and Traffic Survey, as defined by California Vehicle Code section 627, is a survey of highway and traffic conditions conducted in accordance with methods defined in the California Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices; and WHEREAS, California Vehicle Code section 40802 requires an Engineering and Traffic Survey be prepared for each City street segment, every seven to fourteen years, for the use of radar or other electronic devices to enforce speed limits; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 2022, the City Council of the City of Redlands adopted Resolution No. 8348 approving the 2021 Engineering and Traffic Survey report prepared by RK Engineering Group for various streets within the City to update speed limits.

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Section 10.24.030 of the Redlands Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
“10.24.030: PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS:

It is determined upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the orderly movement of vehicular traffic would be facilitated in a reasonable and safe manner by establishing enforceable speed limits under the conditions found to exist upon the following streets. It is declared that the prima facie speed limits shall be as herein set forth on these streets or parts of streets herein designated when signs are erected giving notice thereof. This section does not apply to any twenty five (25) mile per hour prima facie limit which is applicable when passing a school building or the grounds thereof or when passing a senior center or other facility primarily used by senior citizens.

Street Segment
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Alabama Street Barton Road to Park Avenue 45
Alabama Street Park Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 35
Alabama Street Between City limit line south of Santa Ana River and City limit line north of Santa Ana River
55 Alessandro Road Crescent Avenue to Sunset Drive 40
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 390 of 1131 2 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits - Clean.docx Alessandro Road Sunset Drive to Creekside Drive 40
Alessandro Road Creekside Drive to San Timoteo Canyon Road 35 Alta Vista Drive Florida Street to Sunset Drive 40
Barton Road West City Limit to Terracina Boulevard 45
Barton Road Terracina Boulevard to Alabama Street 45
Barton Road Alabama Street to Lakeside Avenue 40
Brockton Avenue New York Street to Texas Street 30
Brockton Avenue Texas Street to Church Street 35
Brockton Avenue Church Street to Judson Street 35
Brockton Avenue Judson Street to Wabash Avenue 35
Brookside Avenue Lakeside Avenue to Center Street 35
Brookside Avenue Center Street to Eureka Street 35
Cajon Street Vine Street to Fern Avenue 30
Cajon Street Fern Avenue to Garden Street 35
California Street Palmetto Avenue to Almond Avenue (southbound) 45 California Street Almond Avenue to Redlands Boulevard 40 Center Street State Street to Brookside Avenue 35
Center Street Brookside Avenue to Cypress Avenue 35
Center Street Cypress Avenue to Crescent Avenue 35
Center Street Crescent Avenue to Ridge Street 35
Central Avenue University Street to Judson Street 30
Church Street Pioneer Avenue to Redlands Boulevard 35
Citrus Avenue Eureka Street to Orange Street 30
Citrus Avenue Redlands Boulevard to University Street 30 Citrus Avenue University Street to Wabash Avenue 40
Colton Avenue Redlands Boulevard to Church Street 40
Colton Avenue Church Street to Grove Street 35
Colton Avenue Grove Street to Lincoln Street 40
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 391 of 1131 3 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits - Clean.docx Colton Avenue Dearborn Street to Wabash Avenue 45
Crescent Avenue Ramona Drive to Serpentine Drive 35
Crestview Road Ford Street to Buckingham Drive 30
Cypress Avenue Terracina Boulevard to Center Street 40
Cypress Avenue Center Street to Redlands Boulevard 40
Cypress Avenue Redlands Boulevard to Citrus Avenue 40
Dearborn Street 5th Avenue to Colton Avenue 40
Dearborn Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 35
Dearborn Street Lugonia Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue 45 Dearborn Street San Bernardino Avenue to Sessums Drive 40 Elizabeth Street Garden Street to Crescent Avenue 45
Fern Avenue Redlands Boulevard to Cajon Street 35
Fern Avenue Cajon Street to Center Street 35
Fern Avenue Center Street to San Mateo Street 40
Fern Avenue San Mateo Street to Terracina Boulevard 35
Fifth Avenue Ford Street to Dearborn Street 45
Fifth Avenue Dearborn Street to Wabash Avenue 45
Ford Street Citrus Avenue to Fifth Avenue 40
Ford Street Fifth Avenue to Reservoir Road 40
Ford Street Reservoir Road to Sunset Drive 45
Ford Street Sunset Drive to Garden Hill Drive 40
Franklin Avenue Eucalyptus Drive to Oak Street 35
Franklin Avenue Oak Street to Garden Street 35
Garden Street Mariposa Drive to Cajon Street 40
Grove Street Highland Avenue to Citrus Avenue 35
Grove Street Citrus Avenue to Brockton Avenue 35
Highland Avenue Ford Street to Cajon Street 45
Highland Avenue Cajon Street to San Mateo Street 35
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 392 of 1131 4 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits - Clean.docx Highland Avenue San Mateo Street to Serpentine Drive 30 Judson Street Citrus Avenue to Colton Avenue 40
Judson Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 35
Judson Street Lugonia Avenue to Pioneer Avenue 35
Live Oak Canyon Road San Timoteo Canyon Road to Easterly City Boundary
45 Lugonia Avenue 1,500 feet w/o Research Avenue to California Street
50 Lugonia Avenue California Street to Alabama Street (eastbound) 40 Lugonia Avenue Alabama Street to Tennessee Street (eastbound) 40 Lugonia Avenue Tennessee Street to Texas Street 40
Lugonia Avenue Texas Street to Orange Street 40
Mariposa Drive Wabash Avenue to Country Club Drive 35
Mariposa Drive Country Club Drive to Garden Street 35
Mariposa Drive Halsey Street to Dwight Street 25
Mountain View Avenue I-10 Freeway to Central Avenue (northbound) 50 New York Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 40
Olive Avenue Citrus Avenue to San Mateo Street 35
Olive Avenue San Mateo Street to Terracina Boulevard 35 Orange Street Lugonia Avenue to Pioneer Avenue 40
Orange Street Pioneer Avenue to Hubbard Court 45
Orange Street Hubbard Court to City limits 50
Orange Tree Lane California Street to Nevada Street 35
Orange Tree Lane Nevada Street to Alabama Street 40
Pacific Street Crescent Avenue to Carob Street 25
Pacific Street Carob Street to Ridge Street 25
Palm Avenue Serpentine Drive to San Mateo Street 30
Palm Avenue San Mateo Street to Ford Street 40
Palmetto Avenue Nevada Street to California Street (westbound) 40 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 393 of 1131 5 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits - Clean.docx Palmetto Avenue California Street to Marigold Avenue 40 Palo Alto Drive Country Club Drive to Mirasol Drive 35
Palo Alto Drive Mirasol Drive to Sunset Drive 30
Pennsylvania Avenue Texas Street to Orange Street 35
Pennsylvania Avenue Orange Street to Church Street 35
Pennsylvania Avenue Church Street to University Avenue 35 Pennsylvania Avenue University Avenue to Judson Street 35 Pioneer Avenue Texas Street to Orange Street 35
Pioneer Avenue Orange Street to Occidental Drive 35
Pioneer Avenue Occidental Drive to Dearborn Street 45
Pioneer Avenue Texas Street to I-210 Freeway 40
Redlands Boulevard California Street to Texas Street 40 Redlands Boulevard Texas Street to Eureka Street 35
Redlands Boulevard Eureka Street to Citrus Avenue 30
Redlands Boulevard Citrus Avenue to Highland Avenue 35
Redlands Boulevard Highland Avenue to Ford Street 50
Reservoir Road Ford Street to Wabash Avenue 50
Rossmont Drive Garden Street to Sunset Drive 25
San Bernardino Avenue Tennessee Street to Orange Street 45 San Bernardino Avenue Orange Street to University Street 40 San Bernardino Avenue University Street to Wabash Avenue 45 San Bernardino Avenue Mountain View Avenue to California Street 50 San Mateo Street Brookside Avenue to Fern Avenue 35
San Mateo Street Fern Avenue to Highland Avenue 35
San Timoteo Canyon
Road
Fern Avenue to Barton Road 40
Sunset Drive Vinton Way to Alta Vista Drive 40
Sunset Drive Alta Vista Drive to Panorama Point 30
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 394 of 1131 6 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits - Clean.docx Sunset Drive Serpentine Road to Vinton Way 25
Sunset Drive Panorama Point to Franklin Avenue 35
Sunnyside Avenue Fern Avenue to Cypress Avenue 25
Sunnyside Avenue Cypress Avenue to Smiley Heights Drive 25 Tennessee Street and
San Mateo Street
Colton Avenue to Brookside Avenue 40
Terracina Boulevard Barton Road to Olive Avenue 45
Terracina Boulevard Olive Avenue to Cypress Avenue 35
Texas Street Redlands Boulevard to Lugonia Avenue 35
Texas Street Lugonia Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue 35 Texas Street San Bernardino Avenue to Domestic Avenue 35 University Street Cypress Avenue to Colton Avenue 35
University Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 35
University Street Lugonia Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue 25 Via Vista Drive Country Club Drive to Helena Lane 30
Wabash Avenue Fifth Avenue to Citrus Avenue 45
Wabash Avenue Citrus Avenue to Colton Avenue 40
Wabash Avenue Colton Avenue to Sessums Drive 40
Wabash Avenue Fifth Avenue to Panorama Drive 40
Wabash Avenue Reservoir Road to Palo Alto 35
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 395 of 1131 7 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits - Clean.docx Section 2. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, and thereafter, this ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.
_________________________________
Paul T. Barich, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 396 of 1131 8 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits - Clean.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of November 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 397 of 1131 1 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits-Legislative.docx ORDINANCE NO. 2946

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AMENDING CHAPTER

10.24 OF THE REDLANDS MUNICIPAL CODE CONFIRMING PRIMA

THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. Section 10.24.030 of the Redlands Municipal Code is hereby amended as follows:
“10.24.030: PRIMA FACIE SPEED LIMITS:

Street Segment
Speed
Limit
(mph)
Alabama Street Barton Road to Park Avenue 45
Alabama Street Park Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 35
Alabama Street Between City limit line south of Santa Ana River and City limit line north of Santa Ana River
55 Alessandro Road Crescent Avenue to Sunset Drive 40
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 398 of 1131 2 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits-Legislative.docx Alessandro Road Sunset Drive to Creekside Drive 40
Alessandro Road Creekside Drive to San Timoteo Canyon Road 35 Alta Vista Drive Florida Street to Sunset Drive 35 40
Barton Road West City Limit to Terracina Boulevard 45
Barton Road Terracina Boulevard to Alabama Street 45
Barton Road Alabama Street to Lakeside Avenue 40
Brockton Avenue New York Street to Texas Street 35 30
Brockton Avenue Texas Street to Church Street 35
Brockton Avenue Church Street to Judson Street 35
Brockton Avenue Judson Street to Wabash Avenue 35
Brookside Avenue Lakeside Avenue to Center Street 35
Brookside Avenue Center Street to Eureka Street 35
Cajon Street Vine Street to Fern Avenue 30
Cajon Street Fern Avenue to Garden Street 35
California Street Palmetto Avenue to Almond Avenue (southbound) 40 45 California Street Almond Avenue to Redlands Boulevard 40 Center Street State Street to Brookside Avenue 35
Center Street Brookside Avenue to Cypress Avenue 35
Center Street Cypress Avenue to Crescent Avenue 35
Center Street Crescent Avenue to Ridge Street 30 35
Central Avenue University Street to Judson Street 35 30 Church Street Pioneer Avenue to Redlands Boulevard 35
Citrus Avenue Eureka Street to Orange Street 30
Citrus Avenue Redlands Boulevard to University Street 30 Citrus Avenue University Street to Wabash Avenue 40
Colton Avenue Redlands Boulevard to Church Street 40
Colton Avenue Church Street to Grove Street 35
Colton Avenue Grove Street to Lincoln Street 40
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 399 of 1131 3 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits-Legislative.docx Colton Avenue Dearborn Street to Wabash Avenue 45
Crescent Avenue Ramona Drive to Serpentine Drive 35
Crestview Road Ford Street to Buckingham Drive 30
Cypress Avenue Terracina Boulevard to Center Street 40
Cypress Avenue Center Street to Redlands Boulevard 40
Cypress Avenue Redlands Boulevard to Citrus Avenue 40
Dearborn Street 5th Avenue to Colton Avenue 430
Dearborn Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 30 35
Dearborn Street Lugonia Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue 450 Dearborn Street San Bernardino Avenue to Sessums Drive 40 Elizabeth Street Garden Street to Crescent Avenue 450
Fern Avenue Redlands Boulevard to Cajon Street 35
Fern Avenue Cajon Street to Center Street 35
Fern Avenue Center Street to San Mateo Street 4035
Fern Avenue San Mateo Street to Terracina Boulevard 35
Fifth Avenue Ford Street to Dearborn Street 45
Fifth Avenue Dearborn Street to Wabash Avenue 45
Ford Street Citrus Avenue to Fifth Avenue 40
Ford Street Fifth Avenue to Reservoir Road 40
Ford Street Reservoir Road to Sunset Drive 450
Ford Street Sunset Drive to Garden Hill Drive 4035
Franklin Avenue Eucalyptus Drive to Oak Street 35
Franklin Avenue Oak Street to Garden Street 35
Garden Street Mariposa Drive to Cajon Street 40
Grove Street Highland Avenue to Citrus Avenue 35
Grove Street Citrus Avenue to Brockton Avenue 30 35
Highland Avenue Ford Street to Cajon Street 40 45
Highland Avenue Cajon Street to San Mateo Street 35
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 400 of 1131 4 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits-Legislative.docx Highland Avenue San Mateo Street to Serpentine Drive 30 Judson Street Citrus Avenue to Colton Avenue 40
Judson Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 35
Judson Street Lugonia Avenue to Pioneer Avenue 35
Live Oak Canyon Road San Timoteo Canyon Road to Easterly City Boundary
45 Lugonia Avenue 1,500 feet w/o Research Avenue to California Street
50 Lugonia Avenue California Street to Alabama Street (eastbound) 35 40 Lugonia Avenue Alabama Street to Tennessee Street (eastbound) 35 40 Lugonia Avenue Tennessee Street to Texas Street 35 40
Lugonia Avenue Texas Street to Orange Street 40
Mariposa Drive Wabash Avenue to Country Club Drive 35
Mariposa Drive Country Club Drive to Garden Street 35
Mariposa Drive Halsey Street to Dwight Street 30 25
Mountain View Avenue I-10 Freeway to Central Avenue (northbound) 45 50 New York Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 40
Olive Avenue Citrus Avenue to San Mateo Street 35
Olive Avenue San Mateo Street to Terracina Boulevard 40 35 Orange Street Lugonia Avenue to Pioneer Avenue 40
Orange Street Pioneer Avenue to Hubbard Court 45
Orange Street Hubbard Court to City limits 55 50
Orange Tree Lane California Street to Nevada Street 40 35 Orange Tree Lane Nevada Street to Alabama Street 35 40
Pacific Street Crescent Avenue to Carob Street 25
Pacific Street Carob Street to Ridge Street 25
Palm Avenue Serpentine Drive to San Mateo Street 30
Palm Avenue San Mateo Street to Ford Street 35 40
Palmetto Avenue Nevada Street to California Street (westbound) 40 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 401 of 1131 5 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits-Legislative.docx Palmetto Avenue California Street to Marigold Avenue 35 40 Palo Alto Drive Country Club Drive to Mirasol Drive 35
Palo Alto Drive Mirasol Drive to Sunset Drive 25 30
Pennsylvania Avenue Texas Street to Orange Street 35
Pennsylvania Avenue Orange Street to Church Street 30 35 Pennsylvania Avenue Church Street to University Avenue 35 Pennsylvania Avenue University Avenue to Judson Street 35 Pioneer Avenue Texas Street to Orange Street 35
Pioneer Avenue Orange Street to Occidental Drive 35
Pioneer Avenue Occidental Drive to Dearborn Street 45
Pioneer Avenue Texas Street to I-210 Freeway 35 40
Redlands Boulevard California Street to Texas Street 40 Redlands Boulevard Texas Street to Eureka Street 35
Redlands Boulevard Eureka Street to Citrus Avenue 30
Redlands Boulevard Citrus Avenue to Highland Avenue 40 35 Redlands Boulevard Highland Avenue to Ford Street 50
Reservoir Road Ford Street to Wabash Avenue 45 50
Rossmont Drive Garden Street to Sunset Drive 25
San Bernardino Avenue Tennessee Street to Orange Street 50 45 San Bernardino Avenue Orange Street to University Street 45 40 San Bernardino Avenue University Street to Wabash Avenue 45 San Bernardino Avenue Mountain View Avenue to California Street 45 50 San Mateo Street Brookside Avenue to Fern Avenue 35
San Mateo Street Fern Avenue to Highland Avenue 35
San Timoteo Canyon
Road
Fern Avenue to Barton Road 45 40
Sunset Drive Vinton Way to Alta Vista Drive 30 40
Sunset Drive Alta Vista Drive to Panorama Point 30
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 402 of 1131 6 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits-Legislative.docx Sunset Drive Serpentine Road to Vinton Way 30 25
Sunset Drive Panorama Point to Franklin Avenue 35
Sunnyside Avenue Fern Avenue to Cypress Avenue 25
Sunnyside Avenue Cypress Avenue to Smiley Heights Drive 25 Tennessee Street and
San Mateo Street
Colton Avenue to Brookside Avenue 40
Terracina Boulevard Barton Road to Olive Avenue 45
Terracina Boulevard Olive Avenue to Cypress Avenue 35
Texas Street Redlands Boulevard to Lugonia Avenue 40 35 Texas Street Lugonia Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue 40 35 Texas Street San Bernardino Avenue to Domestic Avenue 35 University Street Cypress Avenue to Colton Avenue 35
University Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 35
University Street Lugonia Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue 30 25 Via Vista Drive Country Club Drive to Helena Lane 30
Wabash Avenue Fifth Avenue to Citrus Avenue 45
Wabash Avenue Citrus Avenue to Colton Avenue 40
Wabash Avenue Colton Avenue to Sessums Drive 35 40
Wabash Avenue Fifth Avenue to Panorama Drive 35 40
Wabash Avenue Reservoir Road to Palo Alto 30 35
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 403 of 1131 7 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits-Legislative.docx Section 2. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, and thereafter, this ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.
_________________________________
Paul T. Barich, Mayor
ATTEST:
____________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 404 of 1131 8 L:\Ord\2946 Amending Chapter 10.24 Prima Facie Speed Limits-Legislative.docx I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 15th day of November 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:
__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 405 of 1131

CITY OF REDLANDS

CITY COUNCIL

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Redlands, County of San Bernardino, State of California, will hold a public hearing to consider the following:

1. PUBLIC HEARING to consider Ordinance No. 2946 amending Title 10 (Vehicles and Traffic) of the Redlands Municipal Code (RMC) and consider the adoption of the ordinance is exempt pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. The proposed revisions to “Chapter 10.24 (Speed Limits)” include the following: amend RMC Section 10.24.030 – Prima Facie Speed Limits.

City of Redlands, Applicant
The general public and all persons affected by these proceedings may appear and be heard at the time of the Public Hearing. The full text of the proposed Ordinance and all materials relevant to this hearing are available for public inspection in the Municipal Utilities and Engineering Department, located at 35 Cajon Street, Ste. 15A, Redlands, California. Phone number is (909) 798-7698. Website: www.cityofredlands.org Said public hearing will be held in the Council Chambers, Civic Center, 35 Cajon Street, Ste. 2, Redlands, California, at 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as may be heard, on Tuesday, November 15, 2022.

Due to time constraints and the number of persons wishing to give oral testimony, time restrictions may be placed on oral testimony at any hearing about this project. You may wish to make your comments in writing to assure that you are able to express yourself adequately. Submit written comments to [email protected].

If you challenge the ordinance described in this notice in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to the public hearing. ________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
City of Redlands, California
Display ad to be published no later than November 5, 2022.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 406 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 407 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 408 of 1131 rk17066.doc
JN:2531-2021-01
2021 ENGINEERING & TRAFFIC SURVEY
City of Redlands, California
Prepared for:

CITY OF REDLANDS
35 Cajon Street, Suite 15A
Redlands, California
Prepared by:

RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
4000 Westerly Place, Suite 280
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Alex Tabrizi, P.E., T.E.

Michael Torres, E.I.T.

Elias Bandek, E.I.T.

Nhi Ly, E.I.T.

Darshan Shivaiah, MS
January 18, 2022
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 409 of 1131 Table of Contents
Section Page

1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................... 1-1

2.0 Summary of Findings ............................................................................ 2-1

2.1 Survey Methodology 2-1

2.2 Speed Zone Recommendations 2-1

3.0 Speed Limits .......................................................................................... 3-1

4.0 Data Collection ...................................................................................... 4-1

4.1 Roadway Characteristics 4-1

4.2 Travel Speed Survey Data 4-1

4.3 Statistical Analysis 4-2

4.4 Collision History 4-3

5.0 Speed Limit Recommendations & Conclusions ..................................... 5-1 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 410 of 1131 List of Attachments
Exhibits
Study Roadway Segment Location Map .................................................................... A Recommended Speed Zones .................................................................................... B Tables
Engineering & Traffic Survey Speed Survey Summary ................................................. 1 Engineering & Traffic Survey Three-Year Collision Rates for Study Area Roadway Segments

Appendices
California MUTCD Sections ....................................................................................... A Speed Survey Statistical Summary Sheets ................................................................... B Existing ADT Traffic Volume Count Sheets ................................................................. C Speed Study Traffic Condition Summary Forms.......................................................... D Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 411 of 1131 1-1

1.0 Introduction
This report contains the engineering and traffic speed survey for the one hundred and thirty-two (132) roadway segments in the City of Redlands (see Exhibit A). The roadway segments identified for speed zone evaluation are listed in Table 1.

For each roadway segment, information was collected on existing roadway characteristics, speed characteristics, traffic volumes, and traffic collisions. Statistical analysis of travel speeds and collisions were performed as part of this study.

Speed limits for each roadway section are recommended consistent with applicable procedures and sections in the California Vehicle Code, the California MUTCD (Manual on Traffic Control Devices). Applicable sections of the California MUTCD are contained in Appendix A.

This report contains an introduction to speed survey requirements and procedures, analysis of existing roadway conditions, speed characteristics, collision history and analysis, and recommended speed limits at each location.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 412 of 1131 2-1

2.0 Summary of Findings

2.1 Survey Methodology

1. As described in the California Vehicle Code and the California MUTCD, regarding how to set speed limits, data was collected on the existing characteristics of roadway segments.

2. All roadways were surveyed to determine existing roadway characteristics and surrounding land uses.

3. Existing travel speeds were obtained with the radar speed survey. A minimum of 100 speed observations were recorded at each survey location using calibrated and certified radar equipment. Existing speed survey statistical summary sheets are contained in Appendix B.

4. Speed observation data was statistically calculated to determine average speed, 85th percentile speed, and 10-mile per hour percentile speed.

5. Collision data was researched and tabulated for each roadway segment for consideration in the speed limit recommendations.

6. To calculate and derive collision rates, existing average daily traffic (ADT) data was collected at each study roadway segment. Detailed 2021 ADT traffic count data for the study segments are contained in Appendix C.

2.2 Speed Zone Recommendations

1. Based on a review of roadway segment survey data, speed zone recommendations were made on each of the roadway segments and are illustrated in Exhibit B. The speed zone survey information and recommended speed limits are also summarized in Table 1.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 413 of 1131 3-1

3.0 Speed Limits
This engineering and traffic survey analysis includes: (a) results of field inventories including radar samplings of speeds, (b) data analysis, and (c) recommended applicable speed limits.

Under State law, speed surveys must be conducted every five years to use radar enforcement.

The California Vehicle Code is specific in its mandate for the performance of engineering and traffic surveys in regard to speed limits. In particular, Chapter 7 of the State Vehicle Code provides that “prima facie” speed limits established under Sections 22352, 22354, 22354.5, 22357, 22358, 22358.3 may not be enforced by radar unless the speed limit has been justified by an engineering and traffic survey within the last five years. All local agencies must conduct engineering and traffic surveys to provide the following:

1. Raise State dictated “prima facie” limits above 25 miles per hour;

2. Lower the otherwise permitted maximum speed of 65 miles per hour; and

3. Enforce speed limits by the use of radar equipment.

Section 22350 is the basis of all speed zone legislation in that it states, “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent…” considering external conditions such as road conditions, weather, and other traffic.

Secondly, the Vehicle Code has established certain “prima facie” speed limits (Section 22352), which may not be exceeded unless the operator of a motor vehicle can prove that it is safe to do so under the Basic Speed Law.

The recommended posted speed limits are based on CA MUTCD Section 2B.13 which states:
“When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two options below:

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 414 of 1131 3-2

1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.3.

2. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used.”
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 415 of 1131 4-1

4.0 Data Collection
This section discusses the survey methodology for the collection of data on existing roadway characteristics, travel speed surveys, and collision experiences. Exhibit A illustrates the roadway locations inventoried. Speed study traffic conditions forms have been prepared for each survey location and are included in Appendix D.

4.1 Roadway Characteristics
Visual inspection of each roadway survey location was performed. Based on the visual survey, speed study traffic conditions forms were completed for data entries such as the number of travel lanes, type of median, existing posted speed limit, and the types of surrounding land uses. Other special conditions inventoried include notations on horizontal and vertical curves, school crosswalks, and school speed zones.

Total curb-to-curb width was also measured and recorded at each speed survey location.

The predominant land use adjacent to the roadway by travel direction was identified. The surrounding uses were identified by the predominant or significant types of uses defining the character and intensity of development along the roadway. Adjacent land uses have direct access if driveways serving the use intersect with the roadway and the land use directly fronts onto the roadway. Land uses not having direct access include those uses with rear or side yards facing the roadway with access from secondary or from parallel roadways. The number of driveways intersecting the roadway is defined as an approximate average distance between driveways along the road segment.

4.2 Travel Speed Survey Data
Radar speed surveys were conducted within the City. Principles for survey methods utilized in this engineering survey followed the procedures set out by the California MUTCD (Appendix A).

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 416 of 1131 4-2
The California MUTCD sets forth the basic procedural steps in conducting an “engineering and traffic survey”. This method is designed for use on all City and County through-highways, arterials, and collector streets.

Surveys were conducted during off-peak hours so that free-flow conditions would allow motorists to drive at a self-determined “safe speed”. An unmarked vehicle was employed as the survey vehicle, with the radar device situated inconspicuously.

The vehicle was located along a straight roadway segment, far enough away from signals, stop signs, major intersections, or roadway obstruction so that motorists were traveling at a free-flow velocity before passing the sampling vehicle.

The samples were recorded in one mile per hour increments. On two-way streets, samples in both directions were obtained. Care was also taken to include a representative proportion of trucks and buses. Speed zone statistical summary sheets for each location are provided in Appendix B of this report.

4.3 Statistical Analysis
Statistical calculations included the 85th percentile (or critical) speed, 10-mile per pace speed, percentage of vehicles in the 10-mile per hour speed and 50th percentile speed. These terms are defined as follows:

Average Speed
The average or arithmetic mean speed characteristics of the speed observations which is calculated by dividing the summation of all observed speeds by the number of observations.
85th Percentile Speed
The 85th percentile speed is the speed at or below which 85 percent of the vehicles traveled. It is the single most important measure used to determine posted speed limits.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 417 of 1131 4-3
10-Mile Per Hour Pace Speed
The 10-mile per hour pace speed is the 10-mile per hour range within which the largest number of observations fall. Typically, 70 percent of the vehicles are contained in this range, with 15% above and 15% below. A properly set speed limit will maximize the percent of vehicles in the 10-mile per hour pace speed.

4.4 Collision History
Collision data for each of the survey segments were reviewed. Collisions that occurred in the intersections were proportionally allocated to each approach leg segment of the intersection. The total number of collisions was then divided by existing traffic volumes to determine a collision rate per million vehicle miles of travel for the (MVMT) roadway segment.

The collision rates were calculated for each roadway segment. Table 2 summarizes the results of the collision history and analysis.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 418 of 1131 5-1

5.0 Speed Limit Recommendations & Conclusions
When a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th percentile speed of free flowing traffic. In accordance with the California MUTCD:

Experience has shown that speed limits should be established at or below the 85th percentile speed. The speed chosen for speed zoning should be in 5-mile per hour increments and should normally be selected at a value nearest below the 85th percentile speed.

In general, the 85th percentile speed will dictate the speed limit to be established pursuant to the reasoning that most drivers are “reasonable and prudent”. Speed limit selections resulting from this survey and analysis thus follow the above guideline. Recommended speed limits are for both directions of travel.

The primary selected speed limits were then considered in relation to roadway characteristics, collision experience, and nearby development on each respective roadway segment. Some of these characteristics may warrant a deviation from the 85th percentile speed. These characteristics include:

1. Higher than average collision histories;

2. Other physical features of the roadway, which are not readily apparent to the driver. These hazards include cross gutters, poor sight distance, and close spacing of controlled intersections; and

3. Compatibility and continuity with speed zones of adjacent cities and/or adjacent reaches of the same street within the City.

The recommended speed limits and results of the analysis are summarized in Table 1 and graphically shown in Exhibit B.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 419 of 1131 Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 420 of 1131 engineering
group, inc.

N
Recommended Speed Zones
Exhibit B
RFP Engineering Traffic Surveys on Various Streets to Update Speed Limits, City of Redlands, CA 2531-2021-01
Legend:
133 = Street Segment Number
= 35 MPH
= 20 MPH
= 40 MPH
= 25 MPH
= 45 MPH
= 50 MPH
= 55 MPH
= Same Speed Limit as Existing
= Increase in Existing Speed Limit
= Decrease in Existing Speed Limit
= 30 MPH
CAJON

ALTA VISTA DR

NEW YORK ST

PENNSYLVANIA AVE

REDLANDS BLVD

PACIFIC ST

CRESCENT AVE

ALESSANDRO RD

ROSSMONT

CRESTVIEW RD
5TH AVE

GROVE ST

CHURCH ST

HIGHLAND AVE

TERRACINA BLVD

SAN TIMOTEO CANYON RD

CITRUS AVE

CENTRAL AVE

SUNSET DR

ORANGE TREE LN

UNIVERSITY ST

VIA VISTA DR

FERN AVE

GARDEN ST

FRANKLIN AVE

RESERVOIR RD

PALM AVE
SAN

CYPRESS AVE

OLIVE AVE

BROOKSIDE AVE

REDLANDS BLVD

TEXAS ST

CENTER ST

ORANGE ST

BROCKTON AVE

JUDSON ST

DEARBORN ST

SUNSET DR S

PALO ALTO DR

ELIZABETH ST

FORD ST

SAN BERNARDINO AVE

PIONEER AVE

COLTON AVE

CALIFORNIA ST

MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE

PALMETTO AVE

SUNNYSIDE AVE

BARTON RD

MARIPOSA DR

LUGONIA AVE

ALABAMA ST ALABAMA ST
CENTER

SAN BERNARDINO AVE

SUNSET DR S WABASH AVE

WABASH AVE

TENNESSEE ST

MARIPOSA DR
1 2
3 4
5 6

MATEO ST
ST
ST
7 8
9 10
11 12 13 14
15 16
17 18
19 20
21 22
23 24
25 26
28 29
30 31 32 33
34 35 36
109
37 38
40 41
42 43
47 44
46 45
48 49
50 39
51 52
53 54
55 56
57 58
59 60
61 62
63 64
65 66 67
78 69
70 71 72
74 73
75 76
77 79
80 81
82 83
84 85
87 86
88 89
90 91 92 93
97 94 95 96
98 99 100
101
102
103
104 DR
108 105 106 107
110
111
112
113
115
114
116
117
118
119
120
123
122
121 124
126
125
127
128
129
130
131
132
68 27
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 421 of 1131 Loc.

No. Roadway Segment
Existing
Posted
Speed
Limit
Recommended
Speed Limit
(MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
50th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
10 mph
Pace
Speed
(MPH)
Percent
Within 10
MPH Pace
Reason for
Adjustment from
85th Percentile
Speed*
1 Alabama Street Barton Road to Park Avenue 45 45 47.0 41.0 35 - 44 72% 2 Alabama Street Park Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 35 35 42.0 38.0 33 - 42 84% 1 3 Alabama Street Between city limit line south of Santa Ana River and city limit line north of Santa Ana River 50 55 58.0 51.0 47 - 56 64% 5, 14 4 Alessandro Road Crescent Avenue to Sunset Drive 40 40 45.0 43.0 38 - 47 89% 5, 8 5 Alessandro Road Sunset Drive to Creekside Drive 40 40 47.0 44.0 39 - 48 82% 8, 10 6 Alessandro Road Creekside Drive to San Timoteo Canyon Road 35 35 41.0 36.0 32 - 41 77% 5, 8, 10 7 Alta Vista Drive Florida Street to Sunset Drive 35 40 47.0 42.0 37 - 46 73% 5, 8, 10 8 Barton Road West City Limit to Terracina Boulevard 45 45 47.0 43.0 38 - 47 75% 9 Barton Road Terracina Boulevard to Alabama Street 45 45 46.0 42.0 37 - 46 77% 10 Barton Road Alabama Street to Lakeside Avenue 40 40 46.0 41.0 38 - 47 65% 2, 5 11 Brockton Avenue New York Street to Texas Street 35 30 37.0 30.0 23 - 32 62% 1 12 Brockton Avenue Texas Street to Church Street 35 35 42.0 37.0 33 - 42 64% 1 13 Brockton Avenue Church Street to Judson Street 35 35 41.0 36.0 32 - 41 82% 1, 5, 12 14 Brockton Avenue Judson Street to Wabash Avenue 35 35 39.0 36.0 30 - 39 73% 2, 5, 14 15 Brookside Avenue Lakeside Avenue to Center Street 35 35 42.0 37.0 33 - 42 80% 3, 6 16 Brookside Avenue Center Street to Eureka Street 35 35 38.0 34.0 29 - 38 78% 3, 6, 14 17 Cajon Street Vine Street to Fern Avenue 25 30 37.0 32.0 29 - 38 73% 2, 3, 6 18 Cajon Street Fern Avenue to Garden Street 30 - 35 35 39.0 35.0 30 - 39 71% 1, 2, 3, 6 19 California Street Palmetto Avenue to Almond Avenue (southbound) 40 45 48.0 41.0 34 - 43 58% 14 20 California Street Almond Avenue to Redlands Boulevard 40 40 45.0 41.0 37 - 46 86% 5 21 Center Street State Street to Brookside Avenue 35 35 39.0 35.0 31 - 40 72% 5, 8, 14 22 Center Street Brookside Avenue to Cypress Avenue 35 35 37.0 33.0 29 - 38 80% 23 Center Street Cypress Avenue to Crescent Avenue 35 35 40.0 35.0 31 - 40 69% 2, 5 24 Center Street Crescent Avenue to Ridge Street 30 35 39.0 35.0 32 - 41 72% 2, 3, 5, 8, 14 25 Central Avenue University Street to Judson Street 35 30 37.0 30.0 24 - 33 65% 1, 2, 5, 6 26 Church Street Pioneer Avenue to Redlands Boulevard 35 35 40.0 37.0 33 - 42 95% 2, 3, 6 27 Citrus Avenue Eureka Street to Orange Street 25 30 34.0 31.0 27-36 90% 6, 14 28 Citrus Avenue Redlands Boulevard to University Street 25 30 34.0 30.0 25-34 80% 1, 6, 14 29 Citrus Avenue University Street to Wabash Avenue 40 40 42.0 38.0 32 - 41 78% 30 Colton Avenue Redlands Boulevard to Church Street 35 40 43.0 37.0 33 - 42 73% 1, 5, 6, 14 31 Colton Avenue Church Street to Grove Street 30 35 41.0 36.0 33 - 42 83% 2, 3, 5, 9, 12 32 Colton Avenue Grove Street to Lincoln Street 35 40 47.0 42.0 36 - 45 79% 2, 3, 5, 7 33 Colton Avenue Dearborn Street to Wabash Avenue 40 45 48.0 42.0 39 - 48 67% 5, 14 34 Crescent Avenue Ramona Drive to Serpentine Drive 30 35 40.0 36.0 31 - 40 78% 2, 3, 5, 6 35 Crestview Road Ford Street to Buckingham Drive 30 30 37.0 32.0 28 - 37 58% 2, 3 36 Cypress Avenue Terracina Boulevard to Center Street 40 40 43.0 38.0 35 - 44 80% 5, 12, 14 37 Cypress Avenue Center Street to Redlands Boulevard 45 40 44.0 39.0 34 - 43 76% 1, 3, 5, 14 38 Cypress Avenue Redlands Boulevard to Citrus Avenue 40 40 43.0 38.0 32 - 41 69% 1, 3, 5, 12, 14 39 Dearborn Street 5th Avenue to Colton Avenue 30 40 43.0 38.0 34 - 43 71% 3, 5, 14 40 Dearborn Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 30 35 36.0 32.0 27 - 36 78% 41 Dearborn Street Lugonia Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue 40 45 48.0 41.0 37 - 46 64% 5, 14 42 Dearborn Street San Bernardino Avenue to Sessums Drive 40 40 40.0 35.0 31 - 40 63% 43 Elizabeth Street Garden Street to Crescent Avenue 40 45 49.0 43.0 39 - 48 67% 3, 5, 14 44 Fern Avenue Redlands Boulevard to Cajon Street 35 35 41.0 36.0 32 - 41 79% 3, 5 *Reason for Adjustment from 85th Percentile Speed:

1. High accident rate conditions 9. Vicinity to activity area such as park, community center, or hospital

2. Direct residential access with pedestrian activity 10. Lack of sidewalks

3. Residential area with pedestrian/bicycle activity 11. Open drainage channel

4. Commercial area with pedestrian activity and access 12. Vicinity to school

5. 10 mph pace speed 13. Change due to existing measured 85th percentile travel speeds

6. On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts

15. Local Residential Roadway - Set at 25 MPH per CVC

16. Narrow Roadway less than 25 feet wide per CVC.

X Recommended speed limit higher than existing speed limit X Recommended speed limit lower than existing speed limit

8. Roadway geometrics such as alignment changes, horizontal curves, railroad crossings, and potential obstructions limiting visibility

14. For cases in which the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed would require a rounding up, then the speed limit may be rounded down to the nearest 5 mph increment below the 85th percentile speed, if no further reduction is used. Refer to CVC Section 21400(b).

Table 1
City of Redlands 2021 Engineering & Traffic Survey
Speed Survey Summary
Recommended speed is determined in accordance with methodologies, procedures and guidelines contained in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Caltrans, 2014 Edition) and California Vehicle Code (CVC).

7. Consistency with the adjacent roadway segment speed limit j:rktables/RK17066.1TB.xls
JN:2531-2021-01 Page 1 of 3
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 422 of 1131 Loc.

No. Roadway Segment
Existing
Posted
Speed
Limit
Recommended
Speed Limit
(MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
50th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
10 mph
Pace
Speed
(MPH)
Percent
Within 10
MPH Pace
Reason for
Adjustment from
85th Percentile
Speed*
Table 1
City of Redlands 2021 Engineering & Traffic Survey
Speed Survey Summary
45 Fern Avenue Cajon Street to Center Street 35 35 38.0 34.0 30 - 39 78% 3, 5, 14 46 Fern Avenue Center Street to San Mateo Street 35 40 44.0 39.0 35 - 44 66% 3, 5, 12, 14 47 Fern Avenue San Mateo Street to Terracina Boulevard 35 35 39.0 34.0 29 - 38 78% 1, 3, 5, 12, 14 48 Fifth Avenue Ford Street to Dearborn Street 45 45 50.0 44.0 39 - 48 71% 5, 10 49 Fifth Avenue Dearborn Street to Wabash Avenue 45 45 49.0 44.0 39 - 48 74% 3, 5, 14 50 Ford Street Citrus Avenue to Fifth Avenue 40 40 47.0 41.0 36 - 45 78% 3, 5 51 Ford Street Fifth Avenue to Reservoir Road 40 40 45.0 40.0 37 - 46 74% 5, 9 52 Ford Street Reservoir Road to Sunset Drive 40 45 48.0 40.0 35 - 44 63% 1, 5, 14 53 Ford Street Sunset Drive to Garden Hill Drive 35 40 44.0 40.0 35 - 44 74% 5, 14 54 Franklin Avenue Eucalyptus Drive to Oak Street 30 35 36.0 30.0 23 - 32 66% 55 Franklin Avenue Oak Street to Garden Street 25 35 39.0 34.0 30 - 39 74% 5 56 Garden Street Mariposa Drive to Cajon Street 35 40 45.0 41.0 37 - 46 81% 3, 5, 10 57 Grove Street Highland Avenue to Citrus Avenue 35 35 38.0 32.0 28 - 37 72% 1, 2, 3, 5, 14 58 Grove Street Citrus Avenue to Brockton Avenue 30 35 41.0 34.0 28 - 37 63% 1, 3, 5, 10, 12 59 Highland Avenue Ford Street to Cajon Street 40 45 49.0 43.0 40 - 49 71% 1, 3, 5, 14 60 Highland Avenue Cajon Street to San Mateo Street 35 35 41.0 37.0 32 - 41 75% 2, 3, 5, 10 61 Highland Avenue San Mateo Street to Serpentine Drive 30 30 31.0 27.0 23 - 32 88% 62 Judson Street Citrus Avenue to Colton Avenue 40 40 45.0 40.0 35 - 44 80% 3, 5, 10 63 Judson Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 35 35 42.0 38.0 34 - 43 89% 2, 3 64 Judson Street Lugonia Avenue to Pioneer Avenue 35 35 40.0 34.0 30 - 39 77% 10 65 Lugonia Avenue 1500' w/o Research Avenue to California Street 50 50 54.0 47.0 43 - 52 63% 1, 5, 6, 14 66 Lugonia Avenue California Street to Alabama Street (eastbound) 45 40 47.0 42.0 37 - 46 72% 5, 10 67 Lugonia Avenue Alabama Street to Tennessee Street (eastbound) 40 40 44.0 41.0 37 - 46 86% 5, 14 68 Lugonia Avenue Tennessee Street to Texas Street 35 40 43.0 39.0 34 - 43 80% 5, 10, 14 69 Lugonia Avenue Texas Street to Orange Street 40 40 45.0 41.0 36 - 45 80% 2, 3, 5, 10, 14 70 Mariposa Drive Wabash Avenue to Country Club Drive 35 35 38.0 32.0 29 - 38 63% 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 14 71 Mariposa Drive Country Club Drive to Garden Street 35 35 40.0 37.0 32 - 41 82% 2, 3, 5, 6, 10 72 Mariposa Drive Halsey Street to Dwight Street 30 25 26.0 20.0 15 - 24 61% 13 73 Mountain View Avenue I-10 Freeway to Central Avenue (northbound) 45 50 54.0 49.0 45 - 54 74% 5, 10, 14 74 New York Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 40 40 45.0 40.0 35 - 44 74% 5, 10 75 Olive Avenue Citrus Avenue to San Mateo Street 35 35 35.0 31.0 27 - 36 91% 76 Olive Avenue San Mateo Street to Terracina Boulevard 35 35 42.0 37.0 34 - 43 74% 1, 2, 3 77 Orange Street Lugonia Avenue to Pioneer Avenue 40 40 43.0 40.0 36 - 45 88% 1, 5, 10, 14 78 Orange Street Pioneer Avenue to Hubbard Court 45 45 45.0 40.0 36 - 45 82% 5, 13 79 Orange Street Hubbard Court to City Limits 50 50 54.0 51.0 46 - 55 87% 10, 14 80 Orange Tree Lane California Street to Nevada Street 30 35 39.0 34.0 30 - 39 76% 5, 9, 14 81 Orange Tree Lane Nevada Street to Alabama Street 30 40 44.0 39.0 34 - 43 65% 5, 10, 14 82 Pacific Street Crescent Avenue to Carob Street 25 25 34.0 28.0 27 - 36 68% 15 83 Pacific Street Carob Street to Ridge Street 20 25 30.0 24.0 20 - 29 70% 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 16 84 Palm Avenue Serpentine Drive to San Mateo Street 30 30 37.0 33.0 28 - 37 73% 1, 2, 3, 5 85 Palm Avenue San Mateo Street to Ford Street 40 40 43.0 38.0 34 - 43 75% 1, 2, 3, 5, 14 86 Palmetto Avenue Nevada Street to California Street (westbound) 30 40 45.0 39.0 34 - 43 61% 5 87 Palmetto Avenue California Street to Marigold Avenue Not Posted 40 44.0 37.0 35 - 44 53% 5 88 Palo Alto Drive Country Club Drive to Mirasol Drive 35 35 40.0 34.0 31 - 40 59% 2, 3, 5 *Reason for Adjustment from 85th Percentile Speed:

1. High accident rate conditions 9. Vicinity to activity area such as park, community center, or hospital

2. Direct residential access with pedestrian activity 10. Lack of sidewalks

3. Residential area with pedestrian/bicycle activity 11. Open drainage channel

4. Commercial area with pedestrian activity and access 12. Vicinity to school

5. 10 mph pace speed 13. Change due to existing measured 85th percentile travel speeds

6. On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts

15. Local Residential Roadway - Set at 25 MPH per CVC

16. Narrow Roadway less than 25 feet wide per CVC.

X Recommended speed limit higher than existing speed limit X Recommended speed limit lower than existing speed limit

7. Consistency with the adjacent roadway segment speed limit

8. Roadway geometrics such as alignment changes, horizontal curves, railroad crossings, and potential obstructions limiting visibility
Recommended speed is determined in accordance with methodologies, procedures and guidelines contained in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Caltrans, 2014 Edition) and California Vehicle Code (CVC).
j:rktables/RK17066TB.xls
JN:2531-2021-01 Page 2 of 3
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 423 of 1131 Loc.

No. Roadway Segment
Existing
Posted
Speed
Limit
Recommended
Speed Limit
(MPH)
85th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
50th
Percentile
Speed
(MPH)
10 mph
Pace
Speed
(MPH)
Percent
Within 10
MPH Pace
Reason for
Adjustment from
85th Percentile
Speed*
Table 1
City of Redlands 2021 Engineering & Traffic Survey
Speed Survey Summary
89 Palo Alto Drive Mirasol Drive to Sunset Drive 25 30 36.0 32.0 26 - 35 74% 2, 3, 5 90 Pennsylvania Avenue Texas Street to Orange Street 30 35 41.0 35.0 29 - 38 63% 1, 3, 5, 6 91 Pennsylvania Avenue Orange Street to Church Street 30 35 39.0 33.0 29 - 38 71% 1, 3, 5, 6, 12, 14 92 Pennsylvania Avenue Church Street to University Street 35 35 39.0 33.0 27 - 36 69% 2, 3, 5, 14 93 Pennsylvania Avenue University Street to Judson Street 35 35 42.0 36.0 31 - 40 67% 2, 3, 5, 14 94 Pioneer Avenue Texas Street to Orange Street 35 35 42.0 37.0 32 - 41 72% 3, 5 95 Pioneer Avenue Orange Street to Occidental Drive 35 35 42.0 38.0 32 - 41 65% 2, 3, 5 96 Pioneer Avenue Occidental Drive to Dearborn Street 35 45 48.0 42.0 37 - 46 58% 5, 10, 14 97 Pioneer Avenue Texas Street to I-210 Freeway Not Posted 40 47.0 41.0 36 - 45 63% 1, 5, 10, 12 98 Redlands Boulevard California Street to Texas Street 40 40 46.0 41.0 38 - 47 71% 1 99 Redlands Boulevard Texas Street to Eureka Street 35 35 41.0 36.0 33 - 42 74% 4, 5 100 Redlands Boulevard Eureka Street to Citrus Avenue 30 30 32.0 29.0 24 - 33 86% 101 Redlands Boulevard Citrus Avenue to Highland Avenue 35 35 42.0 37.0 33 - 42 73% 10 102 Redlands Boulevard Highland Avenue to Ford Street 50 50 55.0 50.0 45 - 54 69% 1, 5, 10 103 Reservoir Road Ford Street to Wabash Avenue 45 50 53.0 47.0 43 - 52 65% 1, 5, 6, 14 104 Rossmont Drive Garden Street to Sunset Drive 25 25 42.0 36.0 29 - 38 62% 5, 3, 10, 15, 16 105 San Bernardino Avenue Tennessee Street to Orange Street 45 45 48.0 43.0 38 - 47 74% 5, 10, 14 106 San Bernardino Avenue Orange Street to University Street 35 40 44.0 40.0 34 - 43 73% 3, 5, 14 107 San Bernardino Avenue University Street to Wabash Avenue 45 45 46.0 42.0 37 - 46 74% 108 San Bernardino Avenue Mountain View Avenue to California Street 45 50 53.0 47.0 45 - 54 61% 5, 14 109 San Mateo Street Brookside Avenue to Fern Avenue 35 35 40.0 36.0 32 - 41 82% 2, 3, 5 110 San Mateo Street Fern Avenue to Highland Avenue 30 35 39.0 36.0 33 - 42 85% 2, 3, 5 111 San Timoteo Canyon Road Fern Avenue to Barton Road 30 -45 40 47.0 42.0 38 - 47 70% 1, 2, 5, 10 112 Sunset Drive Vinton Way to Alta Vista Drive 30 40 44.0 38.0 34 - 43 55% 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 14 113 Sunset Drive Alta Vista Drive to Panorama Point 25 - 30 30 37.0 31.0 26 - 35 66% 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 114 Sunset Drive Serpentine Road to Vinton Way 25 25 31.0 27.0 24 - 33 78% 2, 3, 8, 10 115 Sunset Drive Panorama Point to Franklin Avenue 25 35 39.0 33.0 30 - 39 65% 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 14 116 Sunnyside Avenue Fern Avenue to Cypress Avenue 20 25 29.0 24.0 20 - 29 81% 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 14 117 Sunnyside Avenue Cypress Avenue to Smiley Heights Drive 25 25 30.0 26.0 22 - 31 84% 1, 2, 3, 5, 14 118 Tennessee Street and San Mateo Street Colton Avenue to Brookside Avenue 40 40 43.0 40.0 35 - 44 88% 1, 14 119 Terracina Boulevard Barton Road to Olive Avenue 45 45 50.0 45.0 41 -50 72% 2, 3, 5 120 Terracina Boulevard Olive Avenue to Cypress Avenue 35 35 41.0 35.0 30 - 39 69% 5, 6 121 Texas Street Redlands Boulevard to Lugonia Avenue 40 35 42.0 38.0 33 - 42 75% 1 122 Texas Street Lugonia Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue 40 35 40.0 35.0 29 - 38 75% 1 123 Texas Street San Bernardino Avenue to Domestic Avenue 30 35 41.0 35.0 32 - 41 66% 1, 5, 12 124 University Street Cypress Avenue to Colton Avenue 30 35 40.0 36.0 31 - 40 78% 1, 5, 12 125 University Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 35 35 40.0 36.0 31 - 40 82% 1, 5, 12 126 University Street Lugonia Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue 25 25 34.0 29.0 20 - 32 68% 2, 3, 5, 14, 15 127 Via Vista Drive Country Club Drive to Helena Lane 25 30 34.0 28.0 23 - 32 59% 2, 3, 5, 14 128 Wabash Avenue Fifth Avenue to Citrus Avenue 45 45 51.0 44.0 42 - 51 61% 1 129 Wabash Avenue Citrus Avenue to Colton Avenue 35 40 47.0 41.0 36 - 45 65% 5, 12 130 Wabash Avenue Colton Avenue to Sessums Drive 35 - 40 40 45.0 41.0 36 - 45 71% 2, 5, 10 131 Wabash Avenue Fifth Avenue to Panorama Drive Not Posted 40 43.0 38.0 34 - 43 61% 1, 5, 10, 14 132 Wabash Avenue Reservoir Road to Palo Alto Drive Not Posted 35 38.0 35.0 31 - 40 85% 1, 2, 3, 5, 14 *Reason for Adjustment from 85th Percentile Speed:

1. High accident rate conditions 9. Vicinity to activity area such as park, community center, or hospital

2. Direct residential access with pedestrian activity 10. Lack of sidewalks

3. Residential area with pedestrian/bicycle activity 11. Open drainage channel

4. Commercial area with pedestrian activity and access 12. Vicinity to school

5. 10 mph pace speed 13. Change due to existing measured 85th percentile travel speeds

6. On-street parking with potential traffic conflicts

15. Local Residential Roadway - Set at 25 MPH per CVC

16. Narrow Roadway less than 25 feet wide per CVC.

X Recommended speed limit higher than existing speed limit X Recommended speed limit lower than existing speed limit X Recommended speed limit lower than existing speed limit Recommended speed is determined in accordance with methodologies, procedures and guidelines contained in the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Caltrans, 2014 Edition) and California Vehicle Code (CVC).

7. Consistency with the adjacent roadway segment speed limit

8. Roadway geometrics such as alignment changes, horizontal curves, railroad crossings, and potential obstructions limiting visibility
j:rktables/RK17066TB.xls
JN:2531-2021-01 Page 3 of 3
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 424 of 1131 Loc.

No. Roadway Segment Roadway Limit Segments Number of Collisions Number of
Months
Link Length
(Miles) 2021 ADT1 Collision
Rate2
1 Alabama Street Barton Road to Park Avenue 9 36 0.73 14,656 0.86 2 Alabama Street Park Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 33 36 0.67 25,408 1.99 3 Alabama Street Between city limit line south of Santa Ana River and city limit line north of Santa Ana River 1 36 0.87 21,183 0.05
4 Alessandro Road Crescent Avenue to Sunset Drive 0 36 0.49 6,071 0.00 5 Alessandro Road Sunset Drive to Creekside Drive 2 36 0.71 5,671 0.51 6 Alessandro Road Creekside Drive to San Timoteo Canyon Road 0 36 0.22 4,662 0.00 7 Alta Vista Drive Florida Street to Sunset Drive 0 36 0.55 2,583 0.00 8 Barton Road West City Limit to Terracina Boulevard 3 36 0.16 23,545 1.41 9 Barton Road Terracina Boulevard to Alabama Street 1 36 0.24 16,681 0.33 10 Barton Road Alabama Street to Lakeside Avenue 6 36 0.31 12,049 1.97 11 Brockton Avenue New York Street to Texas Street 1 36 0.20 1,288 5.73 12 Brockton Avenue Texas Street to Church Street 31 36 0.90 5,161 6.65 13 Brockton Avenue Church Street to Judson Street 9 36 0.91 3,426 2.89 14 Brockton Avenue Judson Street to Wabash Avenue 2 36 0.90 2,444 0.90 15 Brookside Avenue Lakeside Avenue to Center Street 10 36 0.65 17,581 0.90 16 Brookside Avenue Center Street to Eureka Street 3 36 0.28 11,844 1.13 17 Cajon Street Vine Street to Fern Avenue 3 36 0.26 9,345 1.60 18 Cajon Street Fern Avenue to Garden Street 15 36 0.90 5,581 2.98 19 California Street Palmetto Avenue to Almond Avenue (southbound) 3 36 0.66 6,556 0.72 20 California Street Almond Avenue to Redlands Boulevard 14 36 0.66 21,194 1.04 21 Center Street State Street to Brookside Avenue 2 36 0.28 7,812 1.12 22 Center Street Brookside Avenue to Cypress Avenue 6 36 0.66 6,106 1.55 23 Center Street Cypress Avenue to Crescent Avenue 6 36 0.62 6,967 1.45 24 Center Street Crescent Avenue to Ridge Street 1 36 0.75 964 1.41 25 Central Avenue University Street to Judson Street 4 36 0.60 1,221 5.73 26 Church Street Pioneer Avenue to Redlands Boulevard 24 36 1.83 8,579 1.46 27 Citrus Avenue Eureka Street to Orange Street 0 36 0.15 9,557 0.00 28 Citrus Avenue Redlands Boulevard to University Street 12 36 0.50 9,078 2.85 29 Citrus Avenue University Street to Wabash Avenue 13 36 1.50 10,491 0.80 30 Colton Avenue Redlands Boulevard to Church Street 70 36 1.80 10,159 3.64 31 Colton Avenue Church Street to Grove Street 4 36 0.67 7,506 0.82 32 Colton Avenue Grove Street to Lincoln Street 3 36 0.39 7,942 1.10 33 Colton Avenue Dearborn Street to Wabash Avenue 1 36 0.40 6,725 0.42 34 Crescent Avenue Ramona Drive to Serpentine Drive 2 36 1.01 1,618 1.21 35 Crestview Road Ford Street to Buckingham Drive 0 36 0.81 394 0.00 36 Cypress Avenue Terracina Boulevard to Center Street 7 36 1.14 5,521 1.09 37 Cypress Avenue Center Street to Redlands Boulevard 11 36 0.77 7,497 1.93 38 Cypress Avenue Redlands Boulevard to Citrus Avenue 8 36 0.57 7,574 1.95 39 Dearborn Street 5th Avenue to Colton Avenue 0 36 0.90 4,498 0.00 40 Dearborn Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 0 36 0.42 3,088 0.00 41 Dearborn Street Lugonia Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue 0 36 0.42 1,656 0.00 42 Dearborn Street San Bernardino Avenue to Sessums Drive 1 36 0.27 1,305 3.61 43 Elizabeth Street Garden Street to Crescent Avenue 1 36 0.87 1,427 0.81 44 Fern Avenue Redlands Boulevard to Cajon Street 0 36 0.87 4,663 0.00 1 ADT = Average Daily Traffic
2 Collisions per million vehicle miles traveled
Source for number of collisions: California Highway Patrol (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database.

Table 2
City of Redlands 2021 Engineering & Traffic Survey
Collision Rates for Study Area Roadway Segments
j:rktables/RK17066TB.xls
JN:2531-2021-01 1 of 3
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 425 of 1131 Loc.

No. Roadway Segment Roadway Limit Segments Number of Collisions Number of
Months
Link Length
(Miles) 2021 ADT1 Collision
Rate2
Table 2
City of Redlands 2021 Engineering & Traffic Survey
Collision Rates for Study Area Roadway Segments
45 Fern Avenue Cajon Street to Center Street 1 36 0.41 4,021 0.68 46 Fern Avenue Center Street to San Mateo Street 0 36 0.41 3,844 0.00 47 Fern Avenue San Mateo Street to Terracina Boulevard 4 36 0.62 3,622 1.85 48 Fifth Avenue Ford Street to Dearborn Street 2 36 0.43 8,435 0.61 49 Fifth Avenue Dearborn Street to Wabash Avenue 2 36 0.40 6,622 0.85 50 Ford Street Citrus Avenue to Fifth Avenue 2 36 0.32 5,207 1.44 51 Ford Street Fifth Avenue to Reservoir Road 5 36 0.45 7,687 1.59 52 Ford Street Reservoir Road to Sunset Drive 21 36 0.36 8,954 7.54 53 Ford Street Sunset Drive to Garden Hill Drive 0 36 0.45 2,882 0.00 54 Franklin Avenue Eucalyptus Drive to Oak Street 0 36 0.38 677 0.00 55 Franklin Avenue Oak Street to Garden Street 1 36 0.40 757 3.72 56 Garden Street Mariposa Drive to Cajon Street 2 36 1.24 2,964 0.53 57 Grove Street Highland Avenue to Citrus Avenue 1 36 0.39 1,132 2.57 58 Grove Street Citrus Avenue to Brockton Avenue 3 36 0.65 2,619 1.82 59 Highland Avenue Ford Street to Cajon Street 9 36 0.95 5,125 1.83 60 Highland Avenue Cajon Street to San Mateo Street 10 36 0.93 6,740 1.59 61 Highland Avenue San Mateo Street to Serpentine Drive 0 36 0.19 1,655 0.00 62 Judson Street Citrus Avenue to Colton Avenue 1 36 0.40 6,745 0.42 63 Judson Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 1 36 0.41 5,714 0.48 64 Judson Street Lugonia Avenue to Pioneer Avenue 2 36 0.66 2,968 1.05 65 Lugonia Avenue 1500' w/o Research Avenue to California Street 1 36 0.78 786 1.65 66 Lugonia Avenue California Street to Alabama Street (eastbound) 8 36 0.90 5,655 1.57 67 Lugonia Avenue Alabama Street to Tennessee Street (eastbound) 10 36 0.46 15,112 1.57 68 Lugonia Avenue Tennessee Street to Texas Street 10 36 0.36 17,580 1.83 69 Lugonia Avenue Texas Street to Orange Street 5 36 0.41 16,227 0.84 70 Mariposa Drive Wabash Avenue to Country Club Drive 0 36 0.28 531 0.00 71 Mariposa Drive Country Club Drive to Garden Street 1 36 0.56 2,933 0.64 72 Mariposa Drive Halsey Street to Dwight Street 0 36 0.24 130 0.00 73 Mountain View Avenue I-10 Freeway to Central Avenue (northbound) 8 36 1.21 11,197 0.58 74 New York Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 1 36 0.40 4,327 0.65 75 Olive Avenue Citrus Avenue to San Mateo Street 5 36 1.16 3,787 1.11 76 Olive Avenue San Mateo Street to Terracina Boulevard 2 36 0.70 4,343 0.67 77 Orange Street Lugonia Avenue to Pioneer Avenue 21 36 0.66 12,289 2.67 78 Orange Street Pioneer Avenue to Hubbard Court 0 36 0.18 17,212 0.00 79 Orange Street Hubbard Court to City Limits 3 36 0.25 17,324 0.91 80 Orange Tree Lane California Street to Nevada Street 0 36 0.43 4,079 0.00 81 Orange Tree Lane Nevada Street to Alabama Street 1 36 0.42 3,298 0.80 82 Pacific Street Crescent Avenue to Carob Street 0 36 0.26 332 0.00 83 Pacific Street Carob Street to Ridge Street 2 36 0.41 217 25.20 84 Palm Avenue Serpentine Drive to San Mateo Street 1 36 0.15 1,103 11.19 85 Palm Avenue San Mateo Street to Ford Street 21 36 2.12 4,445 2.11 86 Palmetto Avenue Nevada Street to California Street (westbound) 0 36 0.40 2,475 0.00 87 Palmetto Avenue California Street to Marigold Avenue 0 36 0.30 1,484 0.00 88 Palo Alto Drive Country Club Drive to Mirasol Drive 0 36 0.18 1,164 0.00 1 ADT = Average Daily Traffic
2 Collisions per million vehicle miles traveled
Source for number of collisions: California Highway Patrol (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database. j:rktables/RK17066TB.xls
JN:2531-2021-01 2 of 3
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 426 of 1131 Loc.

No. Roadway Segment Roadway Limit Segments Number of Collisions Number of
Months
Link Length
(Miles) 2021 ADT1 Collision
Rate2
Table 2
City of Redlands 2021 Engineering & Traffic Survey
Collision Rates for Study Area Roadway Segments
89 Palo Alto Drive Mirasol Drive to Sunset Drive 0 36 0.58 807 0.00 90 Pennsylvania Avenue Texas Street to Orange Street 3 36 0.28 2,987 4.50 91 Pennsylvania Avenue Orange Street to Church Street 4 36 0.40 2,702 4.17 92 Pennsylvania Avenue Church Street to University Street 0 36 0.28 1,732 0.00 93 Pennsylvania Avenue University Street to Judson Street 1 36 0.53 1,524 1.32 94 Pioneer Avenue Texas Street to Orange Street 2 36 0.41 5,599 0.98 95 Pioneer Avenue Orange Street to Occidental Drive 4 36 0.65 5,344 1.19 96 Pioneer Avenue Occidental Drive to Dearborn Street 2 36 1.02 3,105 0.62 97 Pioneer Avenue Texas Street to I-210 Freeway 3 36 0.45 4,109 1.78 98 Redlands Boulevard California Street to Texas Street 59 36 1.97 9,160 3.11 99 Redlands Boulevard Texas Street to Eureka Street 2 36 0.23 12,597 0.94 100 Redlands Boulevard Eureka Street to Citrus Avenue 18 36 0.63 15,875 1.87 101 Redlands Boulevard Citrus Avenue to Highland Avenue 18 36 0.95 15,253 1.23 102 Redlands Boulevard Highland Avenue to Ford Street 1 36 0.52 13,024 0.16 103 Reservoir Road Ford Street to Wabash Avenue 2 36 0.34 2,660 2.60 104 Rossmont Drive Garden Street to Sunset Drive 0 36 0.36 921 0.00 105 San Bernardino Avenue Tennessee Street to Orange Street 10 36 0.88 12,899 0.88 106 San Bernardino Avenue Orange Street to University Street 8 36 0.78 10,147 1.02 107 San Bernardino Avenue University Street to Wabash Avenue 6 36 1.53 7,117 0.53 108 San Bernardino Avenue Mountain View Avenue to California Street 3 36 0.90 13,197 0.25 109 San Mateo Street Brookside Avenue to Fern Avenue 3 36 0.40 9,701 0.87 110 San Mateo Street Fern Avenue to Highland Avenue 5 36 0.66 7,405 1.06 111 San Timoteo Canyon Road Fern Avenue to Barton Road 15 36 1.22 8,612 1.39 112 Sunset Drive Vinton Way to Alta Vista Drive 3 36 0.93 867 3.70 113 Sunset Drive Alta Vista Drive to Panorama Point 1 36 0.47 517 4.48 114 Sunset Drive Serpentine Road to Vinton Way 2 36 3.09 725 0.84 115 Sunset Drive Panorama Point to Franklin Avenue 13 36 1.94 1,102 5.78 116 Sunnyside Avenue Fern Avenue to Cypress Avenue 0 36 0.16 485 0.00 117 Sunnyside Avenue Cypress Avenue to Smiley Heights Drive 0 36 0.28 402 0.00 118 Tennessee Street and San Mateo Street Colton Avenue to Brookside Avenue 17 36 0.93 11,194 1.62 119 Terracina Boulevard Barton Road to Olive Avenue 3 36 0.68 9,075 0.50 120 Terracina Boulevard Olive Avenue to Cypress Avenue 7 36 0.40 8,379 2.35 121 Texas Street Redlands Boulevard to Lugonia Avenue 27 36 0.76 8,781 4.11 122 Texas Street Lugonia Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue 3 36 0.40 4,724 1.79 123 Texas Street San Bernardino Avenue to Domestic Avenue 3 36 0.41 4,134 2.00 124 University Street Cypress Avenue to Colton Avenue 29 36 0.64 17,046 2.75 125 University Street Colton Avenue to Lugonia Avenue 9 36 0.40 11,122 2.25 126 University Street Lugonia Avenue to San Bernardino Avenue 1 36 0.46 1,519 1.58 127 Via Vista Drive Country Club Drive to Helena Lane 0 36 0.64 274 0.00 128 Wabash Avenue Fifth Avenue to Citrus Avenue 0 36 0.39 4,167 0.00 129 Wabash Avenue Citrus Avenue to Colton Avenue 1 36 0.41 5,805 0.47 130 Wabash Avenue Colton Avenue to Sessums Drive 2 36 1.30 8,942 0.17 131 Wabash Avenue Fifth Avenue to Panorama Drive 1 36 0.70 672 2.18 132 Wabash Avenue Reservoir Road to Palo Alto Drive 4 36 0.88 1,362 3.34 1 ADT = Average Daily Traffic
2 Collisions per million vehicle miles traveled
Source for number of collisions: California Highway Patrol (CHP) Statewide Integrated Traffic Records System (SWITRS) database. j:rktables/RK17066TB.xls
JN:2531-2021-01 3 of 3
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 427 of 1131 Appendix A

California MUTCD Sections
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 428 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 132
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
Section 2B.11 Yield Here To Pedestrians Signs and Stop Here For Pedestrians Signs (R1-5 Series) Standard:
01 Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians (R1-5, R1-5a, R1-5b, or R1-5c) signs (see Figure 2B-2) shall be used if yield (stop) lines are used in advance of a marked crosswalk that crosses an uncontrolled multilane approach. The Stop Here for Pedestrians signs shall only be used where the law specifically requires that a driver must stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk. The legend STATE LAW may be displayed at the top of the R1-5, R1-5a, R1-5b, and R1-5c signs, if applicable.

Support:
01a The Stop Here for Pedestrian signs (R1-5b and R1-5c) are deleted as a stop is not required in California per CVC 21950.

Guidance:
02 If yield (stop) lines and Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs are used in advance of a crosswalk that crosses an uncontrolled multi-lane approach, they should be placed 20 to 50 feet in advance of the nearest crosswalk line (see Section 3B.16 and Figure 3B-17), and parking should be prohibited in the area between the yield (stop) line and the crosswalk.
03 Yield (stop) lines and Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs should not be used in advance of crosswalks that cross an approach to or departure from a roundabout.

Option:
04 Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs may be used in advance of a crosswalk that crosses an uncontrolled multi-lane approach to indicate to road users where to yield (stop) even if yield (stop) lines are not used.
05 A Pedestrian Crossing (W11-2) warning sign may be placed overhead or may be post-mounted with a diagonal downward pointing arrow (W16-7P) plaque at the crosswalk location where Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs have been installed in advance of the crosswalk.

Standard:
06 If a W11-2 sign has been post-mounted at the crosswalk location where a Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians sign is used on the approach, the Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians sign shall not be placed on the same post as or block the road user’s view of the W11-2 sign.

Option:
07 An advance Pedestrian Crossing (W11-2) warning sign with an AHEAD or a distance supplemental plaque may be used in conjunction with a Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians sign on the approach to the same crosswalk.
08 In-Street Pedestrian Crossing signs and Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs may be used together at the same crosswalk.

Section 2B.12 In-Street and Overhead Pedestrian Crossing Signs (R1-6, R1-6a, R1-9, and R1-9a) Option:
01 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing (R1-6 or R1-6a) sign (see Figure 2B-2) or the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing (R1-9 or R1-9a) sign (see Figure 2B-2) may be used to remind road users of laws regarding right-of-way at an unsignalized pedestrian crosswalk. The legend STATE LAW may be displayed at the top of the R1-6, R1-6a, R1- 9, and R1-9a signs, if applicable. On the R1-6 and R1-6a signs, the legends STOP or YIELD may be used instead of the appropriate STOP sign or YIELD sign symbol.
02 Highway agencies may develop and apply criteria for determining the applicability of In-Street Pedestrian Crossing signs.

Support:
02a The In-Street Pedestrian crossing (R1-6a) and Overhead Pedestrian Crossing (R1-9a) signs are deleted as a stop is not required in California per CVC 21950.

Standard:
03 If used, the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be placed in the roadway at the crosswalk location on the center line, on a lane line, or on a median island. The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be post-mounted on the left-hand or right-hand side of the roadway.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 429 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 133
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
04 If used, the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be placed over the roadway at the crosswalk location.
05 An In-Street or Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be placed in advance of the crosswalk to educate road users about the State law prior to reaching the crosswalk, nor shall it be installed as an educational display that is not near any crosswalk.

Guidance:
06 If an island (see Chapter 3I) is available, the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign, if used, should be placed on the island.

Option:
07 If a Pedestrian Crossing (W11-2) warning sign is used in combination with an In-Street or an Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign, the W11-2 sign with a diagonal downward pointing arrow (W16-7P) plaque may be postmounted on the right-hand side of the roadway at the crosswalk location.

Standard:
08 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign and the Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall not be used at signalized locations.
09 The STOP FOR legend shall only be used in States where the State law specifically requires that a driver must stop for a pedestrian in a crosswalk.
10 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall have a black legend (except for the red STOP or YIELD sign symbols) and border on a white background, surrounded by an outer yellow or fluorescent yellowgreen background area (see Figure 2B-2). The Overhead Pedestrian Crossing sign shall have a black legend and border on a yellow or fluorescent yellow-green background at the top of the sign and a black legend and border on a white background at the bottom of the sign (see Figure 2B-2). 11 Unless the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign is placed on a physical island, the sign support shall be designed to bend over and then bounce back to its normal vertical position when struck by a vehicle.

Support:
12 The Provisions of Section 2A.18 concerning mounting height are not applicable for the In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign.

Standard:
13 The top of an In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign shall be a maximum of 4 feet above the pavement surface. The top of an In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign placed in an island shall be a maximum of 4 feet above the island surface.

Option:
14 The In-Street Pedestrian Crossing sign may be used seasonably seasonally to prevent damage in winter because of plowing operations, and may be removed at night if the pedestrian activity at night is minimal. 15 In-Street Pedestrian Crossing signs, Overhead Pedestrian Crossing signs, and Yield Here To (Stop Here For) Pedestrians signs may be used together at the same crosswalk.

Section 2B.13 Speed Limit Sign (R2-1)
Support:
00 The setting of speed limits can be controversial and requires a rational and defensible determination to maintain public confidence. Speed limits are normally set near the 85th-percentile speed that statistically represents one standard deviation above the average speed and establishes the upper limit of what is considered reasonable and prudent. As with most laws, speed limits need to depend on the voluntary compliance of the greater majority of motorists. Speed limits cannot be set arbitrarily low, as this would create violators of the majority of drivers and would not command the respect of the public.

Standard:
01 Speed zones (other than statutory speed limits) shall only be established on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) study that has been performed in accordance with traffic engineering practices. The engineering study shall include an analysis of the current speed distribution of free-flowing vehicles. 02 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall display the limit established by law, ordinance, regulation, or as adopted by the authorized agency based on the engineering study. The speed limits displayed shall be in multiples of 5 mph.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 430 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 134
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
03 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs, indicating speed limits for which posting is required by law, shall be located at the points of change from one speed limit to another.
04 At the downstream end of the section to which a speed limit applies, a Speed Limit sign showing the next speed limit shall be installed. Additional Speed Limit signs shall be installed beyond major intersections and at other locations where it is necessary to remind road users of the speed limit that is applicable. 05 Speed Limit signs indicating the statutory speed limits shall be installed at entrances to the State and, where appropriate, at jurisdictional boundaries in urban areas.

Support:
06 In general, the maximum speed limits applicable to rural and urban roads are established:

A. Statutorily – a maximum speed limit applicable to a particular class of road, such as freeways or city streets, that is established by State law; or
B. As altered speed zones – based on engineering studies. 07 State statutory limits might restrict the maximum speed limit that can be established on a particular road, notwithstanding what an engineering study might indicate.

Option:
08 If a jurisdiction has a policy of installing Speed Limit signs in accordance with statutory requirements only on the streets that enter a city, neighborhood, or residential area to indicate the speed limit that is applicable to the entire city, neighborhood, or residential area unless otherwise posted, a CITYWIDE (R2-5aP), NEIGHBORHOOD (R2-5bP), or RESIDENTIAL (R2-5cP) plaque may be mounted above the Speed Limit sign and an UNLESS OTHERWISE POSTED (R2-5P) plaque may be mounted below the Speed Limit sign (see Figure 2B-3).

Guidance:
09 A Reduced Speed Limit Ahead (W3-5 or W3-5a) sign (see Section 2C.38) should be used to inform road users of a reduced speed zone where the speed limit is being reduced by more than 10 mph, or where engineering judgment indicates the need for advance notice to comply with the posted speed limit ahead. 10 States and local agencies should conduct engineering studies at least once every 5, 7 or 10 years, in compliance with CVC Section 40802 to reevaluate non-statutory speed limits on segments of their roadways that have undergone significant changes since the last review, such as the addition or elimination of parking or driveways, changes in the number of travel lanes, changes in the configuration of bicycle lanes, changes in traffic control signal coordination, or significant changes in traffic volumes. 11 No more than three speed limits should be displayed on any one Speed Limit sign or assembly. 12 When a speed limit within a speed zone is posted, it should be within 5 mph of the 85th-percentile speed of freeflowing traffic.

Standard:
12aWhen a speed limit is to be posted, it shall be established at the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed of free-flowing traffic, except as shown in the two Options below.

Option:

1. The posted speed may be reduced by 5 mph from the nearest 5 mph increment of the 85th-percentile speed, in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5. See Standard below for documentation requirements.

Standard:
12b If the speed limit to be posted has had the 5 mph reduction applied, then an E&TS shall document in writing the conditions and justification for the lower speed limit and be approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer. The reasons for the lower speed limit shall be in compliance with CVC Sections 627 and 22358.5.

Support:
12c The following examples are provided to explain the application of these speed limit criteria:

Example 1. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round down: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 37 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 37 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph established speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 431 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 135
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 2. Using Option 1 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, then the speed limit would be established at 35 mph since it is the closest 5 mph increment to the 33 mph speed. As indicated by the option, this 35 mph speed limit could be reduced by 5 mph to 30 mph if the conditions and justification for using this lower speed limit are documented in the E&TS and approved by a registered Civil or Traffic Engineer.

Example 3. Using Option 2 above and first step is to round up: If the 85th percentile speed in a speed survey for a location was 33 mph, instead of rounding up to 35mph, the speed limit can be established at 30mph, but no further reductions can be applied (which is allowed in the two examples above).

Standard:
12d Examples 1 and 2 for establishing posted speed limits shall apply to engineering and traffic surveys (E&TS) performed on or after July 1, 2009 in accordance with Caltrans’ Traffic Operations Policy Directive Number 09-04 dated June 29, 2009.

Option:
12e After January 1, 2012, Example 3 may be used to establish speed limits. Refer to CVC 21400(b).

Support:
12f Any existing E&TS that was performed before July 1, 2009 in accordance with previous traffic control device standards is not required to comply with the new criteria until it is due for reevaluation per the 5, 7 or 10 year criteria. 13 Speed studies for signalized intersection approaches should be taken outside the influence area of the traffic control signal, which is generally considered to be approximately 1/2 mile, to avoid obtaining skewed results for the 85th-percentile speed.

Support:
14 Advance warning signs and other traffic control devices to attract the motorist’s attention to a signalized intersection are usually more effective than a reduced speed limit zone.

Guidance:
15 An advisory speed plaque (see Section 2C.08) mounted below a warning sign should be used to warn road users of an advisory speed for a roadway condition. A Speed Limit sign should not be used for this situation.

Option:
16 Other factors that may be considered when establishing or reevaluating speed limits are the following:

A. Road characteristics, shoulder condition, grade, alignment, and sight distance; B. The pace;
C. Roadside development and environment;
D. Parking practices and pedestrian activity; and
E. Reported crash experience for at least a 12-month period. 17 Two types of Speed Limit signs may be used: one to designate passenger car speeds, including any nighttime information or minimum speed limit that might apply; and the other to show any special speed limits for trucks and other vehicles.
18 A changeable message sign that changes the speed limit for traffic and ambient conditions may be installed provided that the appropriate speed limit is displayed at the proper times. 19 A changeable message sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit sign.

Guidance:
20 If a changeable message sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend YOUR SPEED XX MPH or such similar legend should be displayed. The color of the changeable message legend should be a yellow legend on a black background or the reverse of these colors.

Support:
21 Advisory Speed signs and plaques are discussed in Sections 2C.08 and 2C.14. Temporary Traffic Control Zone Speed signs are discussed in Part 6. The WORK ZONE (G20-5aP) plaque intended for installation above a Speed Limit sign is discussed in Section 6F.12. School Speed Limit signs are discussed in Section 7B.15.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 432 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 136
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
22 Speed limits in California are governed by the California Vehicle Code (CVC), Sections 22348 through 22413; also, pertinent sections are found in Sections 627 and 40802 and others referenced in this section. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.
23 Refer to Part 6, Section 6C.01 for speed limit signs in temporary traffic control zones. Refer to Part 7 for speed limit signs in school areas.

Engineering and Traffic Survey (E&TS)
Support:
24 CVC Section 627 defines the term “Engineering and traffic survey” and lists its requirements.

Standard:
25 An engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) shall include, among other requirements deemed necessary by Caltrans, consideration of all of the following:

A. Prevailing speeds as determined by traffic engineering measurements.

B. Collision records.

C. Highway, traffic, and roadside conditions not readily apparent to the driver.

Guidance:
26 The E&TS should contain sufficient information to document that the required three items of CVC Section 627 are provided and that other conditions not readily apparent to a driver are properly identified. 27 Prevailing speeds are determined by a speed zone survey. A speed zone survey should include:

A. The intent of the speed measurements is to determine the actual speed of unimpeded traffic. The speed of traffic should not be altered by concentrated law enforcement, or other means, just prior to, or while taking the speed measurements.

B. Only one person is required for the field work. Speeds should be read directly from a radar or other electronic speed measuring devices; or,
C. Devices, other than radar, capable of accurately distinguishing and measuring the unimpeded speed of free flowing vehicles may be used.

D. A location should be selected where prevailing speeds are representative of the entire speed zone section. If speeds vary on a given route, more than one speed zone section may be required, with separate measurements for each section. Locations for measurements should be chosen so as to minimize the effects of traffic signals or stop signs.

E. Speed measurements should be taken during off-peak hours between peak traffic periods on weekdays. If there is difficulty in obtaining the desired quantity, speed measurements may be taken during any period with free flowing traffic.

F. The weather should be fair (dry pavement) with no unusual conditions prevailing.

G. The surveyor and equipment should not affect the traffic speeds. For this reason, an unmarked car is recommended, and the radar speed meter located as inconspicuously as possible.

H. In order for the sample to be representative of the actual traffic flow, the minimum sample should be 100 vehicles in each survey. In no case should the sample contain less than 50 vehicles.

I. Short speed zones of less than 0.5 miles should be avoided, except in transition areas.

J. Speed zone changes should be coordinated with changes in roadway conditions or roadside development.

K. Speed zoning should be in 10 mph increments except in urban areas where 5 mph increments are preferable.

L. Speed zoning should be coordinated with adjacent jurisdictions.

Support:
28 Physical conditions such as width, curvature, grade and surface conditions, or any other condition readily apparent to the driver, in the absence of other factors, would not require special downward speed zoning. Refer to CVC 22358.5.

Option:
29 When qualifying an appropriate speed limit, local authorities may also consider all of the following findings:

A. Residential density, if any of the following conditions exist on the particular portion of highway and the property contiguous thereto, other than a business district:

1. Upon one side of the highway, within 0.25 miles, the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 13 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

2. Upon both sides of the highway, collectively, within a distance of 0.25 miles the contiguous property fronting thereon is occupied by 16 or more separate dwelling houses or business structures.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 433 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 137
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs

3. The portion of highway is larger than 0.25 miles but has the ratio of separate dwelling houses or business structures to the length of the highway described in either subparagraph 1 or 2 above.

B. Pedestrian and bicyclist safety.
30 The following two methods of conducting E&TS may be used to establish speed limits:

1. State Highways - The E&TS for State highways is made under the direction of the Caltrans District Traffic Engineer. The data includes:
a. One copy of the Example of Speed Zone Survey Sheet (See Figure 2B-101(CA)) showing:
 A north arrow
 Engineer's station or post mileage
 Limits of the proposed zones
 Appropriate notations showing type of roadside development, such as “scattered business,” “solid residential,” etc. Schools adjacent to the highway are shown, but other buildings need not be plotted unless they are a factor in the speed recommendation or the point of termination of a speed zone.  Collision rates for the zones involved
 Average daily traffic volume
 Location of traffic signals, signs and markings
 If the highway is divided, the limits of zones for each direction of travel  Plotted 85th percentile and pace speeds at location taken showing speed profile b. A report to the District Director that includes:
 The reason for the initiation of speed zone survey.
 Recommendations and supporting reasons.
 The enforcement jurisdictions involved and the recommendations and opinions of those officials.  The stationing or reference post in mileage at the beginning and ending of each proposed zone and any intermediate equations. Location ties must be given to readily identifiable physical features.

2. City and County Through Highways, Arterials, Collector Roads and Local Streets. a. The short method of speed zoning is based on the premise that a reasonable speed limit is one that conforms to the actual behavior of the majority of motorists, and that by measuring motorists' speeds, one will be able to select a speed limit that is both reasonable and effective. Other factors that need to be considered include but are not limited to: the most recent two-year collision record, roadway design speed, safe stopping sight distance, superelevation, shoulder conditions, profile conditions, intersection spacing and offsets, commercial driveway characteristics, and pedestrian traffic in the roadway without sidewalks.
b. Determination of Existing Speed Limits - Figures 2B-103(CA) & 2B-104(CA) show examples of data sheets which may be used to record speed observations. Specific types of vehicles may be tallied by use of letter symbols in appropriate squares.
31 In most situations, the short form for local streets and roads will be adequate; however, the procedure used on State highways may be used at the option of the local agency.

Guidance:
32 The factors justifying a reduction below the 85th percentile speed for the posted speed limit are the same factors mentioned above. Whenever such factors are considered to establish the speed limit, they should be documented on the speed zone survey or the accompanying engineering report.
33 The establishment of a speed limit of more than 5 mph below the 85th percentile speed should be done with great care as studies have shown that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile generally results in an increase in collision rates; in addition, this may make violators of a disproportionate number of the reasonable majority of drivers.

Support:
34 Generally, the most decisive evidence of conditions not readily apparent to the driver surfaces in collision histories. 35 Speed limits are established at or near the 85th percentile speed, which is defined as that speed at or below which 85th percent of the traffic is moving. The 85th percentile speed is often referred to as the critical speed. Pace speed is defined as the 10 mph increment of speed containing the largest number of vehicles (See Figure 2B-102(CA)). The lower limit of the pace is plotted on the Speed Zone Survey Sheets as an aid in determining the proper zone limits. Speed limits higher than the 85th percentile are not generally considered reasonable and prudent. Speed limits below the 85th percentile do not ordinarily Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 434 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 138
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
facilitate the orderly movement of traffic and require constant enforcement to maintain compliance. Speed limits established on the basis of the 85th percentile conform to the consensus of those who drive highways as to what speed is reasonable and prudent, and are not dependent on the judgment of one or a few individuals. 36 The majority of drivers comply with the basic speed law. Speed limits set at or near the 85th percentile speed provide law enforcement officers with a limit to cite drivers who will not conform to what the majority considers reasonable and prudent.

Further studies show that establishing a speed limit at less than the 85th percentile (Critical Speed) generally results in an increase in collision rates.

Option:
37 When roadside development results in traffic conflicts and unusual conditions which are not readily apparent to drivers, as indicated in collision records, speed limits somewhat below the 85th percentile may be justified. Concurrence and support of enforcement officials are necessary for the successful operation of a restricted speed zone.

Guidance:
38 Speed zones of less than 0.5 miles and short transition zones should be avoided.

Signs
Standard:
39 The Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used to give notice of a prima facie or maximum speed limit except as provided under Prima Facie Speed Limits in CVC 22352.
40 When used, the TRUCKS, 3 AXLES OR MORE 55 MAXIMUM (R6-3(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign.
41 The ALL VEHICLES WHEN TOWING 55 MAXIMUM (R6-4(CA)) sign shall be installed approximately 750 feet following the R6-3(CA) sign.

Guidance:
42 The R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed on highway segments where speeds in excess of 55 mph are permitted.

Option:
43 The existing AUTOS WITH TRAILERS, TRUCKS 55 MAXIMUM (R6-1(CA)) sign may remain in place until it is knocked down, damaged, stolen, vandalized, or otherwise reaches the end of its useful life. 44 The local California Highway Patrol office may be consulted to identify highway segments where enforcement is an issue.

On these segments early replacement of existing R6-1(CA) signs may be necessary.

Support:
45 Refer to CVC Section 22406 for types of vehicles subject to the 55 mph maximum speed limit.

Option:
46 The Speed Zone Ahead (R2-4(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used to inform the motorist of a reduced speed zone.

Standard:
47 The R2-4(CA) sign shall always be followed by a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign installed at the beginning of the zone where the reduced speed limit applies.
48 The End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign shall only be used to mark the end of a speed zone. 49 The R3(CA) sign shall not be used at a transition into a change in speed limits within a reduced zone.

Option:
50 The R3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used with the TRUCK (M4-4) plaque to mark the end of truck speed zones on descending grades.

Standard:
51 Speed limit signs shall be placed at the beginning of all restricted speed zones.

Option:
52 Where speed zones are longer than 1 mile, intermediate signs may be placed at approximate 1 mile intervals. For three or more lanes in each direction, dual installation may be used.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 435 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 139
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
Standard:
53 The Speed Limit (R2-1) and End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) signs, as appropriate shall be placed at the end of all restricted speed zones.
54 Freeways with 65 mph and those segments where a speed limit of 70 mph has been approved by Caltrans, with approval by the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
 At the segment entrance, R2-1 signs shall be installed right of traffic off of the right shoulder.  R2-1 signs shall also be installed off of the right shoulder only, throughout the segment, at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
 The R6-3(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R2-1 sign, both at the beginning and throughout each 60, 65 or 70 mph segment.  The R6-4(CA) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be installed approximately 750 feet following each R6-3(CA) sign.

Option:
 The SLOWER TRAFFIC KEEP RIGHT (R4-3) signs may be installed at locations where there is a tendency of the motorists to drive in the left-hand lane(s) below the normal speed of traffic.

Standard:
 Signs shall be placed in protected locations.
 At the end of the 70/65 mph segment, R2-1 signs shall be installed off of the right shoulder. 55 Freeway segments where a 55 mph speed limit has been approved by Caltrans, with the approval of the California Highway Patrol, shall be posted as follows:
 The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder and left shoulder where the median is of sufficient width to permit sign maintenance without lane closures.

Guidance:
 Subsequent signs should then be posted on the right shoulder, on approximate 3 mile intervals, with no more than 3 interchanges between signs.
 At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.
56 Conventional highways with 55 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:

Standard:
 The beginning of the segment shall be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.

Guidance:
 Subsequent signs should then be posted on approximate 5 to 10 mile intervals and immediately after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
 At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Conventional highways with 65 mph speed limits should be posted as follows:
 The beginning of the segment should be posted with an R2-1 sign installed on the right shoulder.  Subsequent signs should then be posted at 5 to 10 mile intervals and after locations where significant volumes of traffic enter the segment.
 At the end of the segment, an R2-1 sign with the appropriate number for the next speed limit should be posted on the right shoulder.

Option:
57 Pavement markings with appropriate numerals (see Section 3B.21) may be used to supplement speed limit signs.

Standard:
58 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs giving maximum statewide speed limits for various types of vehicles shall be installed on all State highways near the points of entrance into California.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 436 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 140
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
Guidance:
59 The R2-1 and R6-3(CA) and R6-4(CA) signs should be placed in a location to be most effectively viewed by the approaching motorists.

Standard:
60 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with posted speed limits of 65 mph or 70 mph at a maximum of 25 mile intervals.

Option:
61 The 25 mile interval may be modified to include locations following entrance ramps.

Standard:
62 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 65 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.
63 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of freeway with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at approximately 3 mile intervals with no more than 3 interchanges between signs. 64 Speed Limit (R2-1) signs shall be installed throughout segments of conventional highways with a posted speed limit of 55 mph at 5 mile to 10 mile intervals.

Speed Enforced Signs
Option:
65 The SPEED ENFORCED BY RADAR (R48(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used where the California Highway Patrol has received authority to use radar and requests such signs.

Guidance:
66 One sign should be used in each direction at the beginning of the segment of roadway, and at intervening major route intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Support:
67 The R48(CA) sign is a stand-alone sign intended to alert motorists that speed is enforced by radar on a particular segment of roadway.

Option:
68 The RADAR ENFORCED (R48-1(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be used in combination with the Speed Limit (R2- 1) sign on any roadway where law enforcement has the authority to use radar.

Guidance:
69 When used, the R48-1(CA) sign should be placed below the R2-1 sign, at the beginning of the segment of roadway and at intervening major intersections, where radar enforcement is in effect.

Option:
70 The SPEED ENFORCED BY AIRCRAFT (R48-2(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) may be placed, when requested by the California Highway Patrol, on sections of highway regularly patrolled by aircraft.

Standard:
71 The R48-2(CA) sign shall be used for both directions of travel.

Guidance:
72 The R48-2(CA) sign should be placed at the beginning of the section and spaced at 25 mile intervals. See Figure 3B105(CA).

Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs
Option:
73 A Vehicle Speed Feedback sign that displays to approaching drivers the speed at which they are traveling may be installed in conjunction with a Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Standard:
74 If a Vehicle Speed Feedback sign displaying approach speeds is installed, the legend shall be YOUR SPEED XX.

The numerals displaying the speed shall be white, yellow, yellow-green or amber color on black background. When activated, lights shall be steady-burn conforming to the provisions of CVC Sections 21466 and 21466.5. Vehicle Speed Feedback signs shall not alternatively be operated as variable speed limit signs.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 437 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 141
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
Guidance:
75 To the degree practical, numerals for displaying approach speeds should be similar font and size as numerals on the corresponding Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Option:
76 When used, the Vehicle Speed Feedback sign may be mounted on either a separate support or on the same support as the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
77 In lieu of lights, legend may be retroreflective film for flip-disk systems. 78 The legend YOUR SPEED may be white on black plaque located above the changeable speed display.

Support:
79 Driver comprehension may improve when the Vehicle Speed Feedback Sign is mounted on the same support below the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.
80 Vehicle Speed Feedback Signs are appropriate for use with advisory speed signs and with temporary signs in temporary traffic control zones.

Basic Speed Law and Prima Facie Speed Limits – See CVC 22350 & 22352 Support:
81 The basic speed law states “No person shall drive a vehicle upon a highway at a speed greater than is reasonable or prudent having due regard for weather, visibility, the traffic on, and the surface and width of, the highway, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property.” Standard:
82 Prima facie speed limits are specific limits and shall apply unless changed based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) and signs are posted that display the new speed limit.

Option:
83 Prima facie speed limits may be preempted by the basic speed law, when roadway, traffic or weather conditions warrant a lower speed.

Use of Metric System Designations – See CVC 21351.3
Option:
84 Dual units for speed limits on signs may be placed on local streets and roads in both Metric and English units.

Guidance:
85 If used, dual unit speed limits should be rounded to the nearest 10 km/h for Metric and 5 mph for English units for posting on signs on local streets and roads.

Support:
86 Refer to AASHTO’s Traffic Engineering Metric Conversion Factors. See Section 1A.11 for information regarding this publication.

Standard:
87 Metric speed limits shall not be placed on State highways. For use in this California MUTCD, 70 mph shall be shown as a metric equivalent of 110 km/h, neither of which shall be used on any local street or road.

Legal Authority for Establishing Speed Limits
Support:
88 Delegation of legal authority to set speed limits on State highways is given to Caltrans District Directors. The District Director of each transportation district is authorized to issue orders regulating the speed of traffic, up to 65 mph on State highways. The Director of Caltrans retains the authority to approve variable, minimum, and maximum speeds up to 70 mph on State freeways.

Standard:
89 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-101(CA) shall apply, unless changed upon the basis of an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS).

Option:
90 The speed limits shown in Table 2B-102(CA) may apply, unless changed upon E&TS.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 438 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 142
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
Variable Speed Limits on Freeways - See CVC 22355
Option:
91 The following speed limits may apply:
 Whenever Caltrans determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that the safe and orderly movement of traffic upon any freeway segment will be facilitated by the establishment of variable speed limits.  Caltrans may erect, regulate, and control signs upon the state highway which is a freeway, or any portion thereof, which, if used, signs shall be designed to permit display of different speeds at various times of the day or night.  Such signs need not conform to the standards & specifications per CVC 21400, but if used, shall be of sufficient size and clarity to give adequate notice of the applicable speed limit.

Minimum Speed Limits on State Highways - See CVC 22400
Option:
92 The following speed limits may apply:
 Whenever Caltrans determines based upon an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) that slow speeds on any part of a state highway consistently impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, Caltrans may determine and declare a minimum speed limit. Appropriate signs giving notice shall then be installed on that segment.  A motorist can be cited for stopping or impeding the normal and reasonable movement of traffic unless the stop is necessary for safe operation and in compliance with the law.

Speed Traps
Support:
93 Refer to CVC 40802 for Speed Traps.

Standard:
94 A speed trap shall not apply to a local street, road, or school zone. 95 A section of highway shall be defined as a speed trap if the prima facie speed limit is not justified by an engineering and traffic survey (E&TS) within five years, and the enforcement of the speed limit involves the use of radar or any other electronic device that measures the speed of moving objects. 96 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using radar and all of the following criteria are met:
 The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
 The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation. 97 This time provision shall be extended to seven years when using laser or other electronic device (other than radar) and all of the following criteria are met:
 The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 24 hours of certified radar operator course training.
 The arresting officer has successfully completed a minimum of 2 hours of additional approved certified training.  The radar used to measure the speed meets or exceeds the minimal operational standards of the National Traffic Highway Safety Administration, and has been calibrated within three years of the alleged violation.

Option:
98 This time provision for an E&TS may be extended to ten years when all of the above conditions are met and no significant changes in roadway or traffic conditions have occurred, including changes in adjoining property or land use, roadway width, or traffic volume as determined by a registered engineer.

Truck Speed Zone on Descending Grades
Guidance:
99 Highway descending grades, if used for posting TRUCK Speed Limit signs (R2-1 and M4-4) for trucks travelling downhill, should have recorded incident history of runaway commercial vehicles. Descending grades shorter than 1 mile should be avoided for posting signs because deceleration of vehicles due to braking action can generally provide sufficient control on descending grades of less than 1 mile.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 439 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 143
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
Support:
100 To establish a downhill truck speed limit, a physical profile showing length and gradient and a downhill speed profile for three or more axle commercial vehicles with a gross rating of 10,000 lbs. or more will be provided.

Standard:
101 Speed profiles for truck speed limits shall be prepared on the same form as other speed surveys. An analysis of collisions involving trucks shall be prepared.

Guidance:
102 Posted speeds should be on the low side of the scale, generally within the pace of loaded commercial vehicles.

Standard:
103 If warranted, the Caltrans District Director shall issue a standard speed zone order.

Support:
104 Posting of the regulation will be by placement of a standard 36 x 45 inch Speed Limit (R2-1) sign with a TRUCK (M4-4) plate above.

Standard:
105 A standard End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign with TRUCK (M4-4) plate shall be posted at the end of the truck zone when appropriate.

Speed Zones in Temporary Traffic Control Areas
Support:
106 For signing and establishing speed zones in temporary traffic control areas, refer to Section 6C.01 in Part 6.

Section 2B.14 Truck Speed Limit Plaque (R2-2P)
Standard:
01 Where a special speed limit applies to trucks or other vehicles, the legend TRUCKS XX or such similar legend shall be displayed below the legend Speed Limit XX on the same sign or on a separate R2-2P plaque (see Figure 2B-3) below the standard legend.
02 The Truck Speed Limit (R2-2) sign shall not be used in California. The TRUCK (M4-4) plaque placed above the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign shall be used instead.
03 The TRUCK (M4-4) plaque shall be placed above the Speed Limit (R2-1) sign to indicate the truck speed limit. It shall also be placed above the End Speed Limit (R3(CA)) sign to mark the end of truck speed limits.

Support:
04 Refer to Section 2B.13 for more details.

Section 2B.15 Night Speed Limit Plaque (R2-3P)
Standard:
01 Where different speed limits are prescribed for day and night, both limits shall be posted.

Guidance:
02 A Night Speed Limit (R2-3P) plaque (see Figure 2B-3) should be reversed using a white retroreflectorized legend and border on a black background.

Option:
03 A Night Speed Limit plaque may be combined with or installed below the standard Speed Limit (R2-1) sign.

Support:
04 Refer to CVC 22355.

Section 2B.16 Minimum Speed Limit Plaque (R2-4P)
Standard:
01 A Minimum Speed Limit (R2-4P) plaque (see Figure 2B-3) shall be displayed only in combination with a Speed Limit sign.

Option:
02 Where engineering judgment determines that slow speeds on a highway might impede the normal and reasonable movement of traffic, the Minimum Speed Limit plaque may be installed below a Speed Limit (R2-1) Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 440 of 1131 California MUTCD 2014 Edition Page 144
(FHWA’s MUTCD 2009 Edition, including Revisions 1 & 2, as amended for use in California) Chapter 2B – Regulatory Signs, Barricades, and Gates November 7, 2014 Part 2 – Signs
sign to indicate the minimum legal speed. If desired, the Speed Limit sign and the Minimum Speed Limit plaque may be combined on the R2-4a sign (see Figure 2B-3).

Support:
03 Refer to CVC 22400.

Section 2B.17 Higher Fines Signs and Plaque (R2-6P, R2-10, and R2-11) Standard:
01 If increased fines are imposed for traffic violations within a designated zone of a roadway, a BEGIN HIGHER DOUBLE FINES ZONE (R2-10) sign (see Figure 2B-3) or a FINES HIGHER DOUBLE (R2-6P) plaque (see Figure 2B-3) shall be used to provide notice to road users. If used, the FINES HIGHER DOUBLE plaque shall be mounted below an applicable regulatory or warning sign in a temporary traffic control zone, a school zone, or other applicable designated zone.
02 If an R2-10 sign or an R2-6P plaque is posted to provide notice of increased fines for traffic violations, an END HIGHER DOUBLE FINES ZONE (R2-11) sign (see Figure 2B-3) shall be installed at the downstream end of the zone to provide notice to road users of the termination of the increased fines zone.

Guidance:
03 If used, the BEGIN HIGHER DOUBLE FINES ZONE sign or FINES HIGHER DOUBLE plaque should be located at the beginning of the temporary traffic control zone, school zone, or other applicable designated zone and just beyond any interchanges, major intersections, or other major traffic generators.

Standard:
04 The Higher Double Fines signs and plaque shall have a black legend and border on a white rectangular background. All supplemental plaques mounted below the Higher Double Fines signs and plaque shall have a black legend and border on a white rectangular background.

Guidance:
05 Agencies should limit the use of the Higher Double Fines signs and plaque to locations where work is actually underway, or to locations where the roadway, shoulder, or other conditions, including the presence of a school zone and/or a reduced school speed limit zone, require a speed reduction or extra caution on the part of the road user.

Option:
06 Alternate legends such as BEGIN (or END) DOUBLE FINES ZONE may also be used for the R2-10 and R2- 11 signs.
07 The legend FINES HIGHER on the R2-6P plaque may be replaced by FINES DOUBLE (R2-6aP), $XX FINE (R2-6bP), or another legend appropriate to the specific regulation (see Figure 2B-3). 08 The following may be mounted below an R2-10 sign or R2-6P plaque:

A. A supplemental plaque specifying the times that the higher fines are in effect (similar to the S4-1P plaque shown in Figure 7B-1), or
B. A supplemental plaque WHEN CHILDREN (WORKERS) ARE PRESENT, or C. A supplemental plaque WHEN FLASHING (similar to the S4-4P plaque shown in Figure 7B-1) if used in conjunction with a yellow flashing beacon.

Support:
09 Section 6F.12 contains information regarding other signs and plaques associated with increased fines for traffic violations in temporary traffic control zones. Section 7B.10 contains information regarding other signs and plaques associated with increased fines for traffic violations in designated school zones. 10 In California, as per CVC only doubling of the fines is allowed, not higher fines of other denominations. Refer to Section 6F.12 and CVC 42009 for fines for offenses committed in highway construction or maintenance area.

Standard:
11 The SPECIAL DRIVING ZONE BEGINS HERE – DOUBLE FINE ZONE (SR53(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be placed at the beginning of those portions of highways designated and identified as Safety Enhancement – Double Fine Zones per CVC 42010.
12 The SPECIAL DRIVING ZONE ENDS HERE (SR55(CA)) sign (see Figure 2B-3(CA)) shall be placed at the end of those portions of highways designated and identified as Safety Enhancement – Double Fine Zones per CVC 42010.

Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 441 of 1131 Appendix B

Speed Survey Statistical Summary Sheets
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 442 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Alabama Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Barton Road - Park Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 2 0 54 X X 2 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 11:25
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:45
49 1 3 49 X X X X 4
48 2 2 48 X X X X 4 Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 6 0 45 X X X X X X 6
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 *
43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 5 5 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 1 2 40 X X X 3 A % Over Pace: 18% 20% 25%
39 7 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
38 4 4 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 78% 76% 72%
37 4 5 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
36 2 1 36 X X X 3 * % Under Pace: 4% 4% 3%
35 1 6 35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 1 1 34 X X 2 Average Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 42 MPH
33 0 1 33 X 1
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 35 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 40 MPH 41 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/25/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 443 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Alabama Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Park Avenue - Lugonia Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 3 1 45 X X X X 4
44 1 1 44 X X 2 Time
43 0 4 43 X X X X 4 From: 11:05
42 1 6 42 X X X X X X X 7 *
41 3 5 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time
40 1 3 40 X X X X 4 * To: 11:25
39 8 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P
38 6 6 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A Existing
37 4 5 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 C Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
35 5 4 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
34 5 0 34 X X X X X 5 *
33 3 2 33 X X X X X 5 *
32 3 2 32 X X X X X 5
31 0 0 31 0 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics
30 0 0 30 0 % Over Pace: 10% 4% 11%
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 90% 88% 84%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 0% 8% 5%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 32 - 41 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/25/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 444 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Alabama Street
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: City limit line south of Santa Ana River - City limit line north of Santa Ana River 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 3 65 X X X 3
64 0 1 64 X 1 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 10:45
62 0 0 62 0
61 1 1 61 X X 2 Time
60 1 0 60 X 1 To: 11:05
59 1 2 59 X X X 3
58 3 3 58 X X X X X X 6 Existing
57 1 4 57 X X X X X 5 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 1 3 56 X X X X 4 *
55 3 2 55 X X X X X 5 *
54 1 3 54 X X X X 4 *
53 3 0 53 X X X 3 P
52 3 4 52 X X X X X X X 7 A
51 3 5 51 X X X X X X X X 8 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 2 3 50 X X X X X 5 E % Over Pace: 14% 14% 21%
49 9 5 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *
48 6 1 48 X X X X X X X 7 * % In Pace: 68% 64% 64%
47 3 4 47 X X X X X X X 7 *
46 0 2 46 X X 2 % Under Pace: 18% 22% 15%
45 2 1 45 X X X 3
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 50 MPH 53 MPH 52 MPH
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4
42 1 0 42 X 1 Pace Speed: 47 - 56 MPH 49 - 58 MPH 47 - 56 MPH 41 1 0 41 X 1
40 1 0 40 X 1
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 47 MPH 46 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 52 MPH 51 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 56 MPH 58 MPH 58 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/25/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 445 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Alessandro Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Crescent Avenue - Sunset Drive
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 11:30
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 11:50
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 0 48 X 1 Existing
47 4 2 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 3 2 46 X X X X X 5 *
45 6 8 45 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *
44 8 4 44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
43 8 7 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A
42 3 7 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
41 7 7 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 2% 0% 1%
39 1 3 39 X X X X 4 *
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 * % In Pace: 90% 88% 89%
37 1 0 37 X 1
36 0 3 36 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 8% 12% 10%
35 2 1 35 X X X 3
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 446 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Alessandro Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sunset Drive - Creekside Drive
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:10
52 0 0 52 0
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 9:30
49 1 1 49 X X 2
48 8 0 48 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
47 6 2 47 X X X X X X X X 8 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 8 6 46 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *
45 6 3 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 C
42 3 6 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
41 2 5 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 3 4 40 X X X X X X X 7 * % Over Pace: 4% 2% 4%
39 0 3 39 X X X 3 *
38 0 3 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 90% 82% 82%
37 2 1 37 X X X 3
36 0 1 36 X 1 % Under Pace: 6% 16% 14%
35 1 5 35 X X X X X X 6
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 45 MPH 42 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 40 - 49 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 37 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 42 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 46 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/9/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 447 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Alessandro Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Creekside Drive - San Timoteo Canyon Road 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 1 0 44 X 1 Time
43 2 0 43 X X 2 From: 9:30
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4
41 7 3 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Time
40 4 2 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 9:50
39 4 3 39 X X X X X X X 7 *
38 6 2 38 X X X X X X X X 8 P Existing
37 3 3 37 X X X X X X 6 A Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 5 36 X X X X X X X 7 C
35 6 6 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
34 5 4 34 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
33 2 5 33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 1 4 32 X X X X X 5 *
31 2 3 31 X X X X X 5 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 3 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 2% 14% 7%
29 2 2 29 X X X X 4
28 0 2 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 82% 76% 77%
27 0 1 27 X 1
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 10% 16%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 35 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 30 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 35 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 41 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/9/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 448 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Alta Vista Drive
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Florida Street - Sunset Drive
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:00
52 0 1 52 X 1
51 1 2 51 X X X 3 Time
50 3 2 50 X X X X X 5 To: 9:50
49 0 0 49 0
48 3 3 48 X X X X X X 6 Existing
47 2 0 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 2 3 46 X X X X X 5 *
45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 7 3 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
43 4 3 43 X X X X X X X 7 P
42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
41 2 5 41 X X X X X X X 7 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 5 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 E % Over Pace: 14% 16% 17% 39 1 1 39 X X 2 *
38 8 6 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 * % In Pace: 74% 74% 73% 37 1 2 37 X X X 3 *
36 3 1 36 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 12% 10% 10%
35 0 0 35 0
34 1 2 34 X X X 3 Average Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 1 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 449 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Barton Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: West City Limit - Terracina Boulevard 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:20
52 0 3 52 X X X 3
51 0 2 51 X X 2 Time
50 1 2 50 X X X 3 To: 12:40
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 3 48 X X X X 4 Existing
47 4 3 47 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 3 46 X X X X X 5 *
45 7 4 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 4 4 44 X X X X X X X X 8 P
43 4 5 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
42 4 5 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
41 7 1 41 X X X X X X X X 8 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 4% 14% 12%
39 5 3 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 3 3 38 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 84% 66% 75%
37 3 2 37 X X X X X 5
36 0 2 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 12% 20% 13%
35 1 1 35 X X 2
34 2 0 34 X X 2 Average Speed: 42 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 2 33 X X 2
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/25/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 450 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Barton Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Terracina Boulevard - Alabama Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:40
52 2 0 52 X X 2
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 1 2 50 X X X 3 To: 1:00
49 2 3 49 X X X X X 5
48 0 0 48 0 Existing
47 0 1 47 X 1 Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 5 2 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 4 4 44 X X X X X X X X 8 *
43 4 7 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
42 1 8 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
41 3 5 41 X X X X X X X X 8 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 3 40 X X X X X X X X 8 E % Over Pace: 10% 12% 11%
39 6 4 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
38 3 1 38 X X X X 4 * % In Pace: 76% 78% 77%
37 3 2 37 X X X X X 5 *
36 2 1 36 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 14% 10% 12%
35 1 1 35 X X 2
34 1 1 34 X X 2 Average Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 2 0 30 X X 2
29 0 1 29 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/25/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 451 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Barton Road
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Alabama Street - Lakeside Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:00
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 2 0 50 X X 2 To: 1:20
49 2 0 49 X X 2
48 2 3 48 X X X X X 5 Existing
47 2 4 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4 *
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 P
43 1 6 43 X X X X X X X 7 A
42 1 3 42 X X X X 4 C
41 6 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 7 2 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 12% 6% 9%
39 3 0 39 X X X 3 *
38 4 5 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 64% 66% 65%
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6
36 3 1 36 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 24% 28% 26%
35 1 1 35 X X 2
34 4 4 34 X X X X X X X X 8 Average Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 33 0 3 33 X X X 3
32 1 1 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 31 1 0 31 X 1
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 46 MPH 46 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/25/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 452 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Brockton Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: New York Street - Texas Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 1 0 43 X 1 From: 9:05
42 0 1 42 X 1
41 2 3 41 X X X X X 5 Time
40 2 1 40 X X X 3 To: 10:00
39 1 0 39 X 1
38 2 0 38 X X 2 Existing
37 1 4 37 X X X X X 5 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 0 36 X X 2
35 2 9 35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11
34 0 2 34 X X 2
33 1 2 33 X X X 3
32 1 4 32 X X X X X 5 *
31 5 4 31 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 28% 10% 36%
29 4 3 29 X X X X X X X 7 P
28 2 4 28 X X X X X X 6 A % In Pace: 70% 68% 62%
27 2 1 27 X X X 3 C
26 2 1 26 X X X 3 E % Under Pace: 2% 22% 2%
25 4 3 25 X X X X X X X 7 *
24 8 3 24 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * Average Speed: 30 MPH 32 MPH 31 MPH 23 5 2 23 X X X X X X X 7 *
22 1 1 22 X X 2 Pace Speed: 23 - 32 MPH 28 - 37 MPH 23 - 32 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 24 MPH 25 MPH 24 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 32 MPH 30 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/1/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 453 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Brockton Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Texas Street - Church Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 1 1 47 X X 2 Date:
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 3 2 45 X X X X X 5
44 2 0 44 X X 2 Time
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4 From: 10:00
42 2 5 42 X X X X X X X 7 *
41 2 3 41 X X X X X 5 * Time
40 3 3 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 10:45
39 1 4 39 X X X X X 5 P
38 3 0 38 X X X 3 A Existing
37 5 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 1 6 36 X X X X X X X 7 E
35 2 4 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 6 2 34 X X X X X X X X 8 *
33 2 4 33 X X X X X X 6 *
32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6
31 3 1 31 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 0 30 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 26% 10% 14%
29 0 0 29 0
28 1 1 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 58% 74% 64%
27 3 3 27 X X X X X X 6
26 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 16% 16% 22%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 32 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/1/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 454 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Brockton Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Church Street - Judson Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 1 1 43 X X 2 From: 1:05
42 2 1 42 X X X 3
41 2 7 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Time
40 2 5 40 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 1:40
39 5 3 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 3 6 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Existing
37 6 4 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 6 7 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C
35 4 2 35 X X X X X X 6 E
34 4 3 34 X X X X X X X 7 *
33 4 3 33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 4 2 32 X X X X X X 6 *
31 2 3 31 X X X X X 5 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 3 30 X X X X X X 6 % Over Pace: 16% 4% 6%
29 0 0 29 0
28 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 82% 84% 82%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 2% 12% 12%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 37 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 30 - 39 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 37 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/2/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 455 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Brockton Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Judson Street - Wabash Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 1 0 44 X 1 Time
43 1 1 43 X X 2 From: 10:05
42 2 3 42 X X X X X 5
41 1 2 41 X X X 3 Time
40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 10:50
39 2 6 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 4 3 38 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
37 6 5 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
35 6 3 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
34 1 6 34 X X X X X X X 7 C
33 3 0 33 X X X 3 E
32 3 4 32 X X X X X X X 7 *
31 1 2 31 X X X 3 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 4 30 X X X X X X X 7 * % Over Pace: 16% 18% 15%
29 4 3 29 X X X X X X X 7
28 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 76% 74% 73%
27 0 1 27 X 1
26 3 0 26 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 8% 8% 12%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 456 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Brookside Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Lakeside Avenue - Center Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 1 47 X 1 Date:
46 2 2 46 X X X X 4
45 1 3 45 X X X X 4
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 Time
43 1 0 43 X 1 From: 9:00
42 2 4 42 X X X X X X 6 *
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 * Time
40 4 0 40 X X X X 4 * To: 9:20
39 3 4 39 X X X X X X X 7 P
38 5 7 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A Existing
37 8 4 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 6 2 36 X X X X X X X X 8 E
35 1 4 35 X X X X X 5 *
34 4 6 34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
33 5 5 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
32 2 0 32 X X 2
31 0 1 31 X 1 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics
30 0 2 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 14% 16% 15%
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 82% 78% 80%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 4% 6% 5%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 33 - 42 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 44 MPH 42 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/24/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 457 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Brookside Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Center Street - Eureka Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 1 44 X 1 Time
43 0 1 43 X 1 From: 9:20
42 0 2 42 X X 2
41 2 0 41 X X 2 Time
40 0 1 40 X 1 To: 9:40
39 1 4 39 X X X X X 5
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * Existing
37 1 4 37 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 9 5 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 *
35 4 5 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
34 7 3 34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
33 4 5 33 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
32 3 0 32 X X X 3 E
31 4 1 31 X X X X X 5 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 6 5 30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % Over Pace: 6% 18% 12% 29 2 5 29 X X X X X X X 7 *
28 2 2 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 84% 72% 78%
27 1 3 27 X X X X 4
26 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 10% 10% 10%
25 0 0 25 0
24 1 0 24 X 1 Average Speed: 33 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/24/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 458 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Cajon Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Vine Street - Fern Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 12:55
42 0 0 42 0
41 0 1 41 X 1 Time
40 0 2 40 X X 2 To: 1:20
39 2 2 39 X X X X 4
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * Existing
37 4 1 37 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 25 MPH
36 2 3 36 X X X X X 5 *
35 7 3 35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
34 1 4 34 X X X X X 5 A
33 3 3 33 X X X X X X 6 C
32 6 3 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
31 4 4 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 5 5 30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 8% 10% 7% 29 3 7 29 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
28 3 1 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 72% 73%
27 3 1 27 X X X X 4
26 2 2 26 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 16% 18% 20%
25 1 3 25 X X X X 4
24 1 2 24 X X X 3 Average Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 1 0 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 28 - 37 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 31 MPH 32 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 459 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Cajon Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Fern Avenue - Garden Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 1 43 X 1 From: 1:25
42 2 3 42 X X X X X 5
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 4 2 40 X X X X X X 6 To: 1:45
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * Existing
37 1 5 37 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 8 2 36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
35 3 6 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
34 3 6 34 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
33 4 5 33 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
32 4 3 32 X X X X X X X 7 *
31 0 3 31 X X X 3 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 5 2 30 X X X X X X X 7 * % Over Pace: 4% 10% 15%
29 1 2 29 X X X 3
28 3 2 28 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 70% 74% 71%
27 2 1 27 X X X 3
26 2 0 26 X X 2 % Under Pace: 26% 16% 14%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 1 24 X 1 Average Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 32 - 41 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 460 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: California Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Palmetto Avenue - Almond Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 9:05
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 3 0 51 X X X 3 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 10:00
49 5 2 49 X X X X X X X 7
48 3 1 48 X X X X 4 Existing
47 0 3 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 1 5 46 X X X X X X 6
45 3 2 45 X X X X X 5
44 1 1 44 X X 2
43 3 1 43 X X X X 4 *
42 3 4 42 X X X X X X X 7 *
41 5 3 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 P % Over Pace: 34% 12% 34%
39 3 6 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
38 1 4 38 X X X X X 5 C % In Pace: 60% 62% 58%
37 5 2 37 X X X X X X X 7 E
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 * % Under Pace: 6% 26% 8%
35 1 1 35 X X 2 *
34 5 3 34 X X X X X X X X 8 * Average Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 33 0 1 33 X 1
32 2 2 32 X X X X 4 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 31 0 2 31 X X 2
30 1 0 30 X 1
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 40 MPH 41 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 461 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: California Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Almond Avenue - Redlands Boulevard 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 11:00
52 0 0 52 0
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 1 2 50 X X X 3 To: 11:20
49 1 0 49 X 1
48 2 0 48 X X 2 Existing
47 3 0 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 2 2 46 X X X X 4 *
45 4 2 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 4 2 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 4 5 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
42 8 4 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
41 6 8 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 4 7 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E % Over Pace: 10% 4% 10% 39 1 9 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
38 5 4 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 82% 92% 86%
37 2 3 37 X X X X X 5 *
36 2 0 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 8% 4% 4%
35 0 1 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 42 MPH
33 0 1 33 X 1
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 38 - 47 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 40 MPH 41 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 44 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 462 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Center Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: State Street - Brookside Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 10:50
42 0 0 42 0
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 3 1 40 X X X X 4 * To: 11:15
39 5 3 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 7 1 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
37 5 1 37 X X X X X X 6 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 5 10 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A
35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 C
34 2 6 34 X X X X X X X X 8 E
33 2 9 33 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
32 1 2 32 X X X 3 *
31 2 2 31 X X X X 4 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 3 1 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 8% 14% 8%
29 2 3 29 X X X X X 5
28 2 5 28 X X X X X X X 7 % In Pace: 70% 82% 72%
27 2 0 27 X X 2
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 22% 4% 20%
25 0 2 25 X X 2
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 32 - 41 MPH 28 - 37 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 37 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/24/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 463 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Center Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Brookside Avenue - Cypress Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 1 44 X 1 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 10:20
42 0 0 42 0
41 2 1 41 X X X 3 Time
40 0 2 40 X X 2 To: 10:45
39 1 1 39 X X 2
38 4 3 38 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
37 5 4 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 3 36 X X X X X 5 *
35 6 2 35 X X X X X X X X 8 P
34 6 6 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
33 6 6 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
32 3 5 32 X X X X X X X X 8 E
31 3 5 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 2 2 30 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 6% 10% 8%
29 2 5 29 X X X X X X X 7 *
28 4 1 28 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 78% 82% 80%
27 2 2 27 X X X X 4
26 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 16% 8% 12%
25 0 1 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 33 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 1 0 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/24/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 464 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Center Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Cypress Avenue - Crescent Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 2 0 46 X X 2
45 0 0 45 0
44 1 2 44 X X X 3 Time
43 2 0 43 X X 2 From: 9:55
42 6 0 42 X X X X X X 6
41 2 0 41 X X 2 Time
40 1 6 40 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 10:15
39 1 3 39 X X X X 4 *
38 4 5 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Existing
37 3 2 37 X X X X X 5 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 3 4 36 X X X X X X X 7 A
35 6 5 35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
34 2 5 34 X X X X X X X 7 E
33 5 3 33 X X X X X X X X 8 *
32 3 4 32 X X X X X X X 7 *
31 3 1 31 X X X X 4 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 4 30 X X X X X 5 % Over Pace: 30% 4% 15%
29 4 2 29 X X X X X X 6
28 1 3 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 68% 76% 69%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 2% 20% 16%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 1 24 X 1 Average Speed: 36 MPH 35 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/24/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 465 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Center Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Crescent Avenue - Ridge Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 0 0 45 0
44 1 0 44 X 1 Time
43 2 0 43 X X 2 From: 9:00
42 1 0 42 X 1
41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 * Time
40 2 2 40 X X X X 4 * To: 11:00
39 7 3 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
38 4 1 38 X X X X X 5 P Existing
37 2 7 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 A Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
35 1 4 35 X X X X X 5 E
34 1 4 34 X X X X X 5 *
33 4 6 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
32 4 5 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
31 2 1 31 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 4 30 X X X X X 5 % Over Pace: 10% 6% 5%
29 3 3 29 X X X X X X 6
28 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 70% 78% 72%
27 1 1 27 X X 2
26 2 2 26 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 20% 16% 23%
25 0 1 25 X 1
24 0 1 24 X 1 Average Speed: 36 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 32 - 41 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 37 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/26/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 466 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Central Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: University Street - Judson Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 1 44 X 1 Time
43 0 1 43 X 1 From: 12:05
42 0 2 42 X X 2
41 1 1 41 X X 2 Time
40 0 1 40 X 1 To: 1:05
39 0 0 39 0
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 Existing
37 2 3 37 X X X X X 5 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 1 1 36 X X 2
35 2 5 35 X X X X X X X 7
34 2 1 34 X X X 3
33 2 2 33 X X X X 4 *
32 5 7 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
31 3 3 31 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 2 3 30 X X X X X 5 P % Over Pace: 20% 24% 28%
29 5 0 29 X X X X X 5 A
28 5 2 28 X X X X X X X 7 C % In Pace: 70% 60% 65%
27 5 4 27 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
26 1 3 26 X X X X 4 * % Under Pace: 10% 16% 7%
25 3 4 25 X X X X X X X 7 *
24 4 2 24 X X X X X X 6 * Average Speed: 29 MPH 32 MPH 31 MPH 23 2 1 23 X X X 3
22 3 1 22 X X X X 4 Pace Speed: 24 - 33 MPH 26 - 35 MPH 24 - 33 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 24 MPH 25 MPH 25 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 32 MPH 30 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 467 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Church Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Pioneer Avenue - Redlands Boulevard 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 1 43 X 1 From: 11:40
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time
40 4 2 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 12:00
39 5 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
38 7 7 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A Existing
37 6 12 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 6 6 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
35 4 3 35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 5 1 34 X X X X X X 6 *
33 5 3 33 X X X X X X X X 8 *
32 0 2 32 X X 2
31 0 1 31 X 1 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 0 0 30 0 % Over Pace: 2% 2% 2%
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 98% 92% 95%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 0% 6% 3%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 33 - 42 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 468 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Eureka Street - Orange Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 9:25
42 0 0 42 0
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 0 0 40 0 To: 9:45
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 Existing
37 1 0 37 X 1 Speed Limit: 25 MPH
36 4 1 36 X X X X X 5 *
35 1 2 35 X X X 3 *
34 3 5 34 X X X X X X X X 8 *
33 3 5 33 X X X X X X X X 8 P
32 3 6 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 A
31 7 12 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 19 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 7 8 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E % Over Pace: 12% 0% 1% 29 6 4 29 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
28 4 6 28 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % In Pace: 86% 98% 90% 27 3 0 27 X X X 3 *
26 4 0 26 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 2% 2% 9%
25 3 1 25 X X X X 4
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH
23 1 0 23 X 1
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 25 - 34 MPH 28 - 37 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 26 MPH 29 MPH 28 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
1/11/22
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 469 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Redlands Boulevard - University Street 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 9:45
42 0 0 42 0
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 1 0 40 X 1 To: 10:05
39 0 1 39 X 1
38 0 0 38 0 Existing
37 1 0 37 X 1 Speed Limit: 25 MPH
36 3 3 36 X X X X X X 6
35 4 2 35 X X X X X X 6
34 3 0 34 X X X 3 *
33 0 2 33 X X 2 *
32 7 9 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 *
31 8 5 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 1 5 30 X X X X X X 6 A % Over Pace: 10% 12% 15%
29 3 4 29 X X X X X X X 7 C
28 4 4 28 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 78% 84% 80%
27 5 3 27 X X X X X X X X 8 *
26 4 6 26 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Under Pace: 12% 4% 5% 25 4 3 25 X X X X X X X 7 *
24 2 1 24 X X X 3 Average Speed: 30 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH
23 0 1 23 X 1
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 26 - 35 MPH 24 - 33 MPH 25 - 34 MPH 21 0 1 21 X 1
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 26 MPH 26 MPH 26 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
1/11/22
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 470 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Citrus Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: University Street - Wabash Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:35
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 12:55
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 1 48 X X 2 Existing
47 2 1 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 2 0 44 X X 2
43 2 1 43 X X X 3
42 2 4 42 X X X X X X 6
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 6 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 24% 4% 19% 39 3 4 39 X X X X X X X 7 *
38 4 9 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P % In Pace: 72% 90% 78% 37 4 2 37 X X X X X X 6 A
36 3 6 36 X X X X X X X X X 9 C % Under Pace: 4% 6% 3%
35 2 6 35 X X X X X X X X 8 E
34 6 4 34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Average Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 33 3 0 33 X X X 3 *
32 5 2 32 X X X X X X X 7 * Pace Speed: 32 - 41 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 31 2 1 31 X X X 3
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 41 MPH 42 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 471 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Colton Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Redlands Boulevard - Church Street 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 1 48 X 1
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 1 4 45 X X X X X 5
44 4 1 44 X X X X X 5 Time
43 4 1 43 X X X X X 5 From: 10:30
42 2 2 42 X X X X 4 *
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 * Time
40 2 6 40 X X X X X X X X 8 * To: 10:50
39 4 3 39 X X X X X X X 7 P
38 4 3 38 X X X X X X X 7 A Existing
37 2 7 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 C Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 E
35 2 4 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 8 4 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
33 4 3 33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 1 3 32 X X X X 4
31 2 1 31 X X X 3 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 0 0 30 0 % Over Pace: 10% 20% 17%
29 3 0 29 X X X 3
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 70% 78% 73%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 20% 2% 10%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 34 MPH 33 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 472 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Colton Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Church Street - Grove Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 2 0 45 X X 2
44 0 2 44 X X 2 Time
43 1 0 43 X 1 From: 2:00
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 *
41 2 3 41 X X X X X 5 * Time
40 3 4 40 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 2:20
39 4 6 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
38 2 4 38 X X X X X X 6 A Existing
37 6 3 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 C Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 8 5 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E
35 5 7 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
34 4 5 34 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
33 4 3 33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 2 0 32 X X 2
31 3 2 31 X X X X X 5 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 0 2 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 6% 4% 5%
29 1 1 29 X X 2
28 0 1 28 X 1 % In Pace: 82% 84% 83%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 12% 12% 12%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 33 - 42 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 40 MPH 41 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/2/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 473 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Colton Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Grove Street - Lincoln Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 10:05
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 1 3 50 X X X X 4 To: 10:30
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 3 5 48 X X X X X X X X 8 Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 5 4 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 7 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
43 0 4 43 X X X X 4 *
42 9 5 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 P
41 3 8 41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 1 40 X X X X X X 6 C % Over Pace: 10% 0% 17%
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 E
38 8 4 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * % In Pace: 86% 76% 79% 37 0 2 37 X X 2 *
36 2 1 36 X X X 3 * % Under Pace: 4% 24% 4%
35 1 1 35 X X 2
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 42 MPH 43 MPH 42 MPH
33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 41 - 50 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 45 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 474 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Colton Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Dearborn Street - Wabash Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 11:25
52 0 1 52 X 1
51 2 3 51 X X X X X 5 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:50
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 3 3 48 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
47 2 3 47 X X X X X 5 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 2 1 46 X X X 3 *
45 3 2 45 X X X X X 5 P
44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 A
43 5 4 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
42 3 5 42 X X X X X X X X 8 E
41 4 4 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 6 40 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Over Pace: 6% 16% 11%
39 4 3 39 X X X X X X X 7 *
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 % In Pace: 62% 72% 67%
37 3 1 37 X X X X 4
36 1 2 36 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 32% 12% 22%
35 4 1 35 X X X X X 5
34 3 0 34 X X X 3 Average Speed: 41 MPH 43 MPH 42 MPH
33 2 0 33 X X 2
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 1 0 30 X 1
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 39 MPH 36 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 43 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 47 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 475 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Crescent Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Ramona Drive - Serpentine Drive
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 1 47 X 1 Date:
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 1 43 X 1 From: 10:50
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5
41 1 2 41 X X X 3 Time
40 3 5 40 X X X X X X X X 8 * To: 11:10
39 1 4 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 2 4 38 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
37 7 9 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 P Speed Limit: 30 MPH 36 1 4 36 X X X X X 5 A
35 6 3 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
34 9 5 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E
33 1 1 33 X X 2 *
32 5 3 32 X X X X X X X X 8 *
31 3 2 31 X X X X X 5 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 2 1 30 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 10% 8% 11%
29 1 2 29 X X X 3
28 3 1 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 76% 80% 78%
27 1 0 27 X 1
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 14% 12% 11%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 32 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 37 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/9/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 476 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Crestview Road
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Ford Street - Buckingham Drive
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 1 0 43 X 1 From: 9:00
42 0 0 42 0
41 1 0 41 X 1 Time
40 1 1 40 X X 2 To: 2:10
39 1 4 39 X X X X X 5
38 2 0 38 X X 2 Existing
37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 2 3 36 X X X X X 5 *
35 2 2 35 X X X X 4 *
34 3 6 34 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
33 3 4 33 X X X X X X X 7 A
32 6 3 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
31 3 2 31 X X X X X 5 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 0 2 30 X X 2 * % Over Pace: 12% 2% 11%
29 3 1 29 X X X X 4 *
28 3 3 28 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 56% 60% 58%
27 1 4 27 X X X X X 5
26 2 0 26 X X 2 % Under Pace: 32% 38% 31%
25 2 4 25 X X X X X X 6
24 5 0 24 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 23 1 1 23 X X 2
22 2 0 22 X X 2 Pace Speed: 28 - 37 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 28 - 37 MPH 21 1 0 21 X 1
20 0 2 20 X X 2
19 1 0 19 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 24 MPH 25 MPH 24 MPH 18 1 1 18 X X 2
17 0 2 17 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 16 0 1 16 X 1
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 477 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Cypress Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Terracina Boulevard - Center Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:00
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 12:40
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 1 48 X 1 Existing
47 0 1 47 X 1 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 2 0 46 X X 2
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 1 4 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 5 2 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 2 1 42 X X X 3 *
41 6 6 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 A % Over Pace: 4% 6% 5%
39 7 2 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
38 2 8 38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E % In Pace: 86% 74% 80% 37 7 5 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 10% 20% 15%
35 6 4 35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
34 1 1 34 X X 2 Average Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH
33 4 4 33 X X X X X X X X 8
32 0 2 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 0 1 31 X 1
30 0 2 30 X X 2
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/24/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 478 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Cypress Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Center Street - Redlands Boulevard 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:45
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 1 51 X 1 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 1:05
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 0 48 X 1 Existing
47 1 5 47 X X X X X X 6 Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 0 0 46 0
45 5 0 45 X X X X X 5
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4
43 1 2 43 X X X 3 *
42 4 2 42 X X X X X X 6 *
41 2 5 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 6 4 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P % Over Pace: 18% 20% 18% 39 3 4 39 X X X X X X X 7 A
38 6 6 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C % In Pace: 74% 80% 76% 37 3 6 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
36 5 4 36 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Under Pace: 8% 0% 6%
35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 3 4 34 X X X X X X X 7 * Average Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 33 2 0 33 X X 2
32 3 0 32 X X X 3 Pace Speed: 33 - 42 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 31 1 0 31 X 1
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/24/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 479 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Cypress Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Redlands Boulevard - Citrus Avenue 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:05
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 1:25
49 1 0 49 X 1
48 0 1 48 X 1 Existing
47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 2 1 46 X X X 3
45 2 3 45 X X X X X 5
44 1 1 44 X X 2
43 3 2 43 X X X X X 5
42 2 0 42 X X 2
41 8 4 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 4 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 16% 18% 22%
39 3 6 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
38 1 2 38 X X X 3 P % In Pace: 66% 76% 69%
37 6 4 37 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
36 3 4 36 X X X X X X X 7 C % Under Pace: 18% 6% 9%
35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 E
34 2 1 34 X X X 3 * Average Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 33 1 6 33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 * Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 31 3 1 31 X X X X 4
30 0 0 30 0
29 1 1 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH 28 2 1 28 X X X 3
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/24/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 480 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Dearborn Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Fifth Avenue - Colton Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 0 0 48 0
47 2 1 47 X X X 3 Date:
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6
45 0 2 45 X X 2
44 1 1 44 X X 2 Time
43 1 3 43 X X X X 4 * From: 11:55
42 3 3 42 X X X X X X 6 *
41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 * Time
40 5 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P To: 12:30
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 A
38 1 4 38 X X X X X 5 C Existing
37 4 4 37 X X X X X X X X 8 E Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 5 3 36 X X X X X X X X 8 *
35 7 2 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
34 3 5 34 X X X X X X X X 8 *
33 2 1 33 X X X 3
32 2 1 32 X X X 3
31 3 1 31 X X X X 4 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 1 1 30 X X 2 % Over Pace: 12% 18% 14%
29 2 1 29 X X X 3
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 72% 72% 71%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 16% 10% 15%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 33 - 42 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 34 MPH 33 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 45 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 481 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Dearborn Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Colton Avenue - Lugonia Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 1 43 X 1 From: 10:50
42 0 1 42 X 1
41 0 1 41 X 1 Time
40 1 2 40 X X X 3 To: 11:20
39 1 1 39 X X 2
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 Existing
37 1 2 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 3 1 36 X X X X 4 *
35 1 7 35 X X X X X X X X 8 *
34 4 5 34 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
33 3 5 33 X X X X X X X X 8 P
32 8 6 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A
31 7 7 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 4 1 30 X X X X X 5 E % Over Pace: 8% 6% 15%
29 5 2 29 X X X X X X X 7 *
28 5 0 28 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 84% 78% 78%
27 2 2 27 X X X X 4 *
26 1 2 26 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 8% 16% 7%
25 1 0 25 X 1
24 2 1 24 X X X 3 Average Speed: 31 MPH 34 MPH 32 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 30 MPH 28 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 33 MPH 32 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 38 MPH 36 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 482 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Dearborn Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Lugonia Avenue - San Bernardino Avenue 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 2:40
52 1 0 52 X 1
51 1 2 51 X X X 3 Time
50 2 1 50 X X X 3 To: 3:45
49 0 2 49 X X 2
48 5 2 48 X X X X X X X 7 Existing
47 1 0 47 X 1 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 2 4 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 3 1 45 X X X X 4 *
44 0 5 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 P
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 A
41 3 5 41 X X X X X X X X 8 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 6 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E % Over Pace: 10% 18% 20% 39 5 1 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 2 4 38 X X X X X X 6 * % In Pace: 60% 68% 64%
37 4 3 37 X X X X X X X 7 *
36 0 2 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 30% 14% 16%
35 2 1 35 X X X 3
34 1 1 34 X X 2 Average Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH
33 0 1 33 X 1
32 3 1 32 X X X X 4 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 31 1 0 31 X 1
30 2 1 30 X X X 3
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 37 MPH 36 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/2/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 483 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Dearborn Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: San Bernardino Avenue - Sessums Drive 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 2:30
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 3:45
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 1 48 X 1 Existing
47 1 0 47 X 1 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0
43 1 2 43 X X X 3
42 1 2 42 X X X 3
41 2 2 41 X X X X 4 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 4 2 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 8% 20% 14%
39 2 4 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 66% 62% 63%
37 6 2 37 X X X X X X X X 8 P
36 2 4 36 X X X X X X 6 A % Under Pace: 26% 18% 23%
35 5 3 35 X X X X X X X X 8 C
34 2 4 34 X X X X X X 6 E Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 33 3 1 33 X X X X 4 *
32 5 3 32 X X X X X X X X 8 * Pace Speed: 32 - 41 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 31 2 4 31 X X X X X X 6 *
30 3 3 30 X X X X X X 6
29 2 1 29 X X X 3 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 28 MPH 29 MPH 28 2 3 28 X X X X X 5
27 1 1 27 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 26 1 0 26 X 1
25 0 2 25 X X 2 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 24 1 2 24 X X X 3
23 1 0 23 X 1
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 484 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Elizabeth Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Garden Street - Crescent Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 2 0 55 X X 2
54 0 1 54 X 1 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 2:30
52 1 2 52 X X X 3
51 1 0 51 X 1 Time
50 2 2 50 X X X X 4 To: 3:30
49 1 1 49 X X 2
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 * Existing
47 3 3 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 P
44 5 6 44 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
43 6 3 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
42 2 6 42 X X X X X X X X 8 E
41 2 3 41 X X X X X 5 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 0 40 X X X 3 * % Over Pace: 16% 15% 15%
39 4 4 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 1 0 38 X 1 % In Pace: 66% 69% 67%
37 0 2 37 X X 2
36 3 0 36 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 18% 17% 17%
35 2 2 35 X X X X 4
34 2 2 34 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 33 0 0 33 0
32 1 1 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 1 31 X 1
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 48 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 48 GRAND TOTALS 98
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 485 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fern Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Redlands Boulevard - Cajon Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 0 48 X 1
47 2 0 47 X X 2 Date:
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 0 0 45 0
44 1 0 44 X 1 Time
43 1 2 43 X X X 3 From: 3:15
42 0 4 42 X X X X 4
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 * Time
40 3 3 40 X X X X X X 6 * To: 3:40
39 1 3 39 X X X X 4 *
38 7 3 38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P Existing
37 4 7 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 4 5 36 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
35 7 5 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E
34 2 6 34 X X X X X X X X 8 *
33 3 4 33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6 *
31 3 1 31 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 0 0 30 0 % Over Pace: 12% 4% 12%
29 1 0 29 X 1
28 2 1 28 X X X 3 % In Pace: 74% 86% 79%
27 0 0 27 0
26 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 14% 10% 9%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 32 - 41 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 33 MPH 32 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/24/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 486 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fern Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Cajon Street - Center Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 1 1 43 X X 2 From: 2:55
42 1 0 42 X 1
41 0 1 41 X 1 Time
40 1 1 40 X X 2 To: 3:15
39 4 3 39 X X X X X X X 7 *
38 6 2 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
37 2 1 37 X X X 3 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 5 6 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
35 5 8 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A
34 3 4 34 X X X X X X X 7 C
33 5 6 33 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E
32 6 4 32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
31 2 3 31 X X X X X 5 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 1 2 30 X X X 3 * % Over Pace: 4% 6% 6%
29 1 3 29 X X X X 4
28 2 2 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 78% 78%
27 2 1 27 X X X 3
26 0 2 26 X X 2 % Under Pace: 18% 16% 16%
25 0 0 25 0
24 1 0 24 X 1 Average Speed: 34 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH
23 2 0 23 X X 2
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/24/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 487 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fern Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Center Street - San Mateo Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:35
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 2:05
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 3 0 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 1 4 46 X X X X X 5
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 3 3 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 *
41 3 4 41 X X X X X X X 7 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 5 40 X X X X X 5 A % Over Pace: 22% 16% 14%
39 2 5 39 X X X X X X X 7 C
38 6 0 38 X X X X X X 6 E % In Pace: 66% 70% 66%
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6 *
36 2 5 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 12% 14% 20%
35 7 2 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
34 3 2 34 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 38 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 33 4 1 33 X X X X X 5
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 33 - 42 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 2 0 31 X X 2
30 1 2 30 X X X 3
29 1 1 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 35 MPH 33 MPH 28 1 1 28 X X 2
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 45 MPH 44 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/24/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 488 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fern Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: San Mateo Street - Terracina Boulevard 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 2 0 44 X X 2 Time
43 2 0 43 X X 2 From: 2:05
42 1 1 42 X X 2
41 1 1 41 X X 2 Time
40 2 1 40 X X X 3 To: 2:55
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 0 6 38 X X X X X X 6 * Existing
37 3 3 37 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 7 3 36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
35 3 7 35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
34 8 3 34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
33 2 4 33 X X X X X X 6 C
32 3 2 32 X X X X X 5 E
31 3 4 31 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 4 5 30 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Over Pace: 18% 10% 16% 29 6 2 29 X X X X X X X X 8 *
28 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 80% 78% 78%
27 1 3 27 X X X X 4
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 2% 12% 6%
25 0 1 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 28 - 37 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 30 MPH 30 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/24/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 489 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fifth Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Ford Street - Dearborn Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 1 0 56 X 1
55 0 0 55 0
54 2 0 54 X X 2 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 3:20
52 0 2 52 X X 2
51 2 3 51 X X X X X 5 Time
50 1 4 50 X X X X X 5 To: 4:00
49 0 2 49 X X 2
48 4 4 48 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
47 4 2 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 2 5 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 P
44 5 5 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
43 7 1 43 X X X X X X X X 8 C
42 4 6 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
41 3 3 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 * % Over Pace: 14% 6% 19%
39 1 3 39 X X X X 4 *
38 4 2 38 X X X X X X 6 % In Pace: 74% 70% 71%
37 2 0 37 X X 2
36 0 1 36 X 1 % Under Pace: 12% 24% 10%
35 0 1 35 X 1
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 44 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 42 - 51 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 45 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 50 MPH 50 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/26/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 490 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Fifth Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Dearborn Street - Wabash Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 1 55 X 1
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 12:20
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 0 4 51 X X X X 4 Time
50 0 2 50 X X 2 To: 12:45
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 4 1 48 X X X X X 5 * Existing
47 5 1 47 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 3 7 45 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
44 3 5 44 X X X X X X X X 8 A
43 8 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 E
41 2 5 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 1 40 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 10% 26% 16%
39 3 3 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 80% 72% 74%
37 1 2 37 X X X 3
36 0 0 36 0 % Under Pace: 10% 2% 10%
35 0 0 35 0
34 2 1 34 X X X 3 Average Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 39 - 48 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 50 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 491 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Ford Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Citrus Avenue - Fifth Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 3 53 X X X 3 From: 11:00
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 11:25
49 1 1 49 X X 2
48 2 1 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 2 2 47 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 2 0 46 X X 2
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 3 4 43 X X X X X X X 7 *
42 3 7 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
41 3 8 41 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 1 4 40 X X X X X 5 C % Over Pace: 18% 20% 19%
39 7 3 39 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E
38 5 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % In Pace: 76% 80% 78% 37 6 1 37 X X X X X X X 7 *
36 3 3 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 6% 0% 3%
35 3 0 35 X X X 3
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 41 MPH 43 MPH 42 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 42 MPH 41 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/26/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 492 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Ford Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Fifth Avenue - Reservoir Road
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 11:30
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 11:50
49 2 1 49 X X X 3
48 1 0 48 X 1 Existing
47 0 4 47 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 0 4 46 X X X X 4 *
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4 *
44 1 2 44 X X X 3 *
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 P
42 6 2 42 X X X X X X X X 8 A
41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 5 9 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E % Over Pace: 12% 2% 9% 39 12 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 17 *
38 4 3 38 X X X X X X X 7 * % In Pace: 78% 76% 74%
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6 *
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 10% 22% 17%
35 3 1 35 X X X X 4
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH
33 2 1 33 X X X 3
32 2 0 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 31 1 1 31 X X 2
30 0 1 30 X 1
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 37 MPH 36 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/26/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 493 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Ford Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Reservoir Road - Sunset Drive
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 11:50
52 2 2 52 X X X X 4
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 4 0 50 X X X X 4 To: 12:10
49 2 2 49 X X X X 4
48 2 0 48 X X 2 Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 3 1 46 X X X X 4
45 1 2 45 X X X 3
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 4 2 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 1 6 42 X X X X X X X 7 *
41 1 2 41 X X X 3 P Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 5 4 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 A % Over Pace: 40% 20% 27% 39 1 5 39 X X X X X X 6 C
38 4 4 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 56% 72% 63%
37 2 4 37 X X X X X X 6 *
36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 4% 8% 10%
35 2 4 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 4 1 34 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 42 MPH 40 MPH 41 MPH 33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 1 1 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 1 30 X 1
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 50 MPH 46 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/26/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 494 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Ford Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Sunset Drive - Garden Hill Drive
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:10
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 1 0 50 X 1 To: 1:05
49 2 0 49 X X 2
48 0 2 48 X X 2 Existing
47 1 1 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 0 3 46 X X X 3
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 6 4 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
43 3 1 43 X X X X 4 *
42 6 5 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
41 5 3 41 X X X X X X X X 8 P Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 8 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A % Over Pace: 8% 20% 11% 39 1 4 39 X X X X X 5 C
38 5 3 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 82% 70% 74%
37 2 1 37 X X X 3 *
36 4 4 36 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Under Pace: 10% 10% 15% 35 1 2 35 X X X 3 *
34 2 6 34 X X X X X X X X 8 Average Speed: 41 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH 33 1 0 33 X 1
32 1 3 32 X X X X 4 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 0 2 31 X X 2
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 39 MPH 40 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 44 MPH 44 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/26/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 495 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Franklin Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Eucalyptus Drive - Oak Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 2:05
42 3 0 42 X X X 3
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 0 1 40 X 1 To: 3:40
39 1 0 39 X 1
38 0 3 38 X X X 3 Existing
37 3 1 37 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 3 1 36 X X X X 4
35 4 4 35 X X X X X X X X 8
34 2 1 34 X X X 3
33 3 0 33 X X X 3
32 4 3 32 X X X X X X X 7 *
31 7 3 31 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 2 5 30 X X X X X X X 7 * % Over Pace: 14% 22% 30%
29 3 3 29 X X X X X X 6 P
28 1 2 28 X X X 3 A % In Pace: 66% 70% 66%
27 4 6 27 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
26 2 2 26 X X X X 4 E % Under Pace: 20% 8% 4%
25 3 4 25 X X X X X X X 7 *
24 3 4 24 X X X X X X X 7 * Average Speed: 31 MPH 29 MPH 30 MPH 23 2 3 23 X X X X X 5 *
22 0 2 22 X X 2 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 23 - 32 MPH 23 - 32 MPH 21 0 1 21 X 1
20 0 1 20 X 1
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 25 MPH 24 MPH 24 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 28 MPH 30 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 35 MPH 36 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 496 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Franklin Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Oak Street - Garden Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 1 1 44 X X 2 Time
43 1 0 43 X 1 From: 1:05
42 1 1 42 X X 2
41 1 4 41 X X X X X 5 Time
40 3 0 40 X X X 3 To: 2:00
39 2 2 39 X X X X 4 *
38 4 3 38 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
37 4 3 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 25 MPH
36 3 1 36 X X X X 4 P
35 6 5 35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
34 3 5 34 X X X X X X X X 8 C
33 3 4 33 X X X X X X X 7 E
32 5 7 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
31 4 6 31 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 1 3 30 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 8% 14% 14%
29 1 1 29 X X 2
28 4 0 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 74% 78% 74%
27 0 1 27 X 1
26 1 1 26 X X 2 % Under Pace: 18% 8% 12%
25 1 1 25 X X 2
24 1 0 24 X 1 Average Speed: 34 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 31 MPH 30 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 497 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Garden Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Mariposa Drive - Cajon Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:30
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 3 51 X X X 3 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 10:00
49 1 1 49 X X 2
48 1 1 48 X X 2 Existing
47 2 1 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 0 3 46 X X X 3 *
45 1 8 45 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
44 2 4 44 X X X X X X 6 *
43 4 5 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
42 8 2 42 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
41 6 2 41 X X X X X X X X 8 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 8 3 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E % Over Pace: 10% 12% 10% 39 4 7 39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
38 8 2 38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % In Pace: 90% 78% 81% 37 1 3 37 X X X X 4 *
36 2 1 36 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 0% 10% 9%
35 2 3 35 X X X X X 5
34 0 1 34 X 1 Average Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 41 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 43 MPH 41 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 46 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 498 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Grove Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Highland Avenue - Citrus Avenue
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 1 1 43 X X 2 From: 2:05
42 0 1 42 X 1
41 1 3 41 X X X X 4 Time
40 3 2 40 X X X X X 5 To: 4:00
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 0 1 38 X 1 Existing
37 3 1 37 X X X X 4 * Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 0 5 36 X X X X X 5 *
35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 5 0 34 X X X X X 5 P
33 3 4 33 X X X X X X X 7 A
32 6 4 32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C
31 8 5 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 E Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 4 2 30 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 12% 18% 16%
29 5 8 29 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 *
28 1 1 28 X X 2 * % In Pace: 76% 68% 72%
27 1 0 27 X 1
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 12% 14% 12%
25 4 4 25 X X X X X X X X 8
24 1 1 24 X X 2 Average Speed: 32 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 28 - 37 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 28 - 37 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 499 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Grove Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Citrus Avenue - Brockton Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:50
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 1:30
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 0 1 48 X 1 Existing
47 0 1 47 X 1 Speed Limit: N / P MPH
46 1 2 46 X X X 3
45 3 0 45 X X X 3
44 0 0 44 0
43 3 1 43 X X X X 4
42 1 1 42 X X 2
41 1 2 41 X X X 3 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 1 1 40 X X 2 % Over Pace: 20% 26% 27%
39 3 3 39 X X X X X X 6
38 1 0 38 X 1 % In Pace: 62% 64% 63%
37 5 3 37 X X X X X X X X 8 *
36 5 4 36 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % Under Pace: 18% 10% 10% 35 2 4 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 5 4 34 X X X X X X X X X 9 P Average Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 33 3 4 33 X X X X X X X 7 A
32 1 3 32 X X X X 4 C Pace Speed: 30 - 39 MPH 28 - 37 MPH 28 - 37 MPH 31 1 2 31 X X X 3 E
30 5 4 30 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
29 3 3 29 X X X X X X 6 * 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH 28 1 1 28 X X 2 *
27 4 2 27 X X X X X X 6 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 26 0 1 26 X 1
25 1 2 25 X X X 3 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 500 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Highland Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Ford Street - Cajon Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 11:40
52 1 4 52 X X X X X 5
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 1 2 50 X X X 3 To: 12:05
49 4 2 49 X X X X X X 6 *
48 2 6 48 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
47 0 1 47 X 1 * Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 P
45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6 A
44 2 2 44 X X X X 4 C
43 5 10 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E
42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
41 6 0 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 5 5 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 18% 14% 10% 39 3 0 39 X X X 3
38 3 2 38 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 76% 70% 71%
37 2 1 37 X X X 3
36 0 2 36 X X 2 % Under Pace: 6% 16% 19%
35 2 0 35 X X 2
34 1 2 34 X X X 3 Average Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 1 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 40 - 49 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/2/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 501 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Highland Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Cajon Street - San Mateo Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 11:05
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 11:40
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0 Existing
47 1 0 47 X 1 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 2 0 46 X X 2
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 3 1 44 X X X X 4
43 0 3 43 X X X 3
42 0 2 42 X X 2
41 5 2 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 6 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 14% 2% 13% 39 1 4 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 7 1 38 X X X X X X X X 8 P % In Pace: 72% 78% 75%
37 4 7 37 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
36 4 6 36 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C % Under Pace: 14% 20% 12% 35 2 4 35 X X X X X X 6 E
34 1 4 34 X X X X X 5 * Average Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 33 4 1 33 X X X X X 5 *
32 4 4 32 X X X X X X X X 8 * Pace Speed: 32 - 41 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 31 2 1 31 X X X 3
30 3 1 30 X X X X 4
29 2 0 29 X X 2 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 28 0 1 28 X 1
27 0 2 27 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/2/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 502 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Highland Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: San Mateo Street - Serpentine Drive 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 10:10
42 0 0 42 0
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 0 0 40 0 To: 11:05
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 Existing
37 1 0 37 X 1 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 0 0 36 0
35 1 1 35 X X 2
34 1 2 34 X X X 3
33 2 1 33 X X X 3
32 2 2 32 X X X X 4 *
31 4 3 31 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 1 6 30 X X X X X X X 7 * % Over Pace: 10% 6% 9%
29 5 3 29 X X X X X X X X 8 P
28 9 4 28 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A % In Pace: 90% 86% 88% 27 5 9 27 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 C
26 3 8 26 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 E % Under Pace: 0% 8% 3% 25 8 4 25 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
24 5 3 24 X X X X X X X X 8 * Average Speed: 28 MPH 28 MPH 28 MPH 23 3 1 23 X X X X 4 *
22 0 2 22 X X 2 Pace Speed: 23 - 32 MPH 24 - 33 MPH 23 - 32 MPH 21 0 1 21 X 1
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 24 MPH 25 MPH 24 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/2/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 503 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Judson Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Citrus Avenue - Colton Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:10
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 1 51 X 1 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 12:30
49 2 1 49 X X X 3
48 2 1 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 2 2 46 X X X X 4
45 1 3 45 X X X X 4
44 5 4 44 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
43 4 2 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 4 7 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
41 2 5 41 X X X X X X X 7 P Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 5 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A % Over Pace: 14% 8% 16% 39 5 3 39 X X X X X X X X 8 C
38 3 5 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 84% 82% 80%
37 6 2 37 X X X X X X X X 8 *
36 5 0 36 X X X X X 5 * % Under Pace: 2% 10% 4%
35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 *
34 0 2 34 X X 2 Average Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 35 - 44 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 1 1 31 X X 2
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/2/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 504 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Judson Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Colton Avenue - Lugonia Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 12:30
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 1:00
49 0 0 49 0
48 1 0 48 X 1 Existing
47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 3 0 46 X X X 3
45 2 1 45 X X X 3
44 0 1 44 X 1
43 4 1 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 6 3 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
41 4 5 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 5 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P % Over Pace: 12% 4% 8% 39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 A
38 2 5 38 X X X X X X X 7 C % In Pace: 86% 92% 89%
37 9 9 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 E
36 3 4 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 2% 4% 3%
35 6 5 35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
34 2 3 34 X X X X X 5 * Average Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 33 1 0 33 X 1
32 0 1 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 31 0 1 31 X 1
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 41 MPH 42 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/2/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 505 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Judson Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Lugonia Avenue - Pioneer Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 3:15
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 3:55
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0 Existing
47 1 0 47 X 1 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 0 0 46 0
45 3 0 45 X X X 3
44 1 0 44 X 1
43 3 1 43 X X X X 4
42 3 1 42 X X X X 4
41 1 1 41 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 3 1 40 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 24% 8% 19%
39 3 3 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 3 2 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 68% 86% 77%
37 1 4 37 X X X X X 5 *
36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 P % Under Pace: 8% 6% 4%
35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 A
34 5 10 34 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 C Average Speed: 37 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH 33 5 4 33 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
32 2 7 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 31 5 3 31 X X X X X X X X 8 *
30 3 4 30 X X X X X X X 7 *
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 28 1 2 28 X X X 3
27 0 1 27 X 1 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 38 MPH 40 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/1/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 506 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Lugonia Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: 1500' W/ Research Avenue - California Street 72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 9:00
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 9:25
59 0 2 59 X X 2
58 0 1 58 X 1 Existing
57 2 2 57 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 2 2 56 X X X X 4
55 1 3 55 X X X X 4
54 1 2 54 X X X 3
53 1 2 53 X X X 3
52 2 2 52 X X X X 4 *
51 3 4 51 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 50 3 1 50 X X X X 4 * % Over Pace: 18% 28% 21%
49 0 3 49 X X X 3 P
48 2 2 48 X X X X 4 A % In Pace: 64% 64% 63%
47 5 6 47 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5 E % Under Pace: 18% 8% 16%
45 5 6 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 1 4 44 X X X X X 5 * Average Speed: 46 MPH 49 MPH 48 MPH 43 6 3 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
42 3 1 42 X X X X 4 Pace Speed: 42 - 51 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 43 - 52 MPH 41 1 0 41 X 1
40 1 1 40 X X 2
39 2 1 39 X X X 3 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 44 MPH 42 MPH 38 2 1 38 X X X 3
37 2 0 37 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 36 1 0 36 X 1
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 52 MPH 55 MPH 54 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 507 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Lugonia Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: California Street - Alabama Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 1 0 54 X 1 Time
53 1 1 53 X X 2 From: 9:00
52 2 2 52 X X X X 4
51 0 1 51 X 1 Time
50 3 1 50 X X X X 4 To: 9:25
49 1 1 49 X X 2
48 0 1 48 X 1 Existing
47 1 2 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 1 3 46 X X X X 4 *
45 3 8 45 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
44 0 3 44 X X X 3 *
43 8 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
42 4 3 42 X X X X X X X 7 A
41 6 3 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 3 40 X X X X X X X 7 E % Over Pace: 20% 14% 18%
39 3 3 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 3 6 38 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 72% 76% 72%
37 3 1 37 X X X X 4 *
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 % Under Pace: 8% 10% 10%
35 2 2 35 X X X X 4
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 42 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 38 - 47 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 38 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 43 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 47 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 508 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Lugonia Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Alabama Street - Tennessee Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:30
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 9:50
49 1 0 49 X 1
48 0 0 48 0 Existing
47 3 0 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 6 1 46 X X X X X X X 7 *
45 1 0 45 X 1 *
44 3 1 44 X X X X 4 *
43 3 6 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 P
42 7 4 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 A
41 6 10 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 16 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 9 40 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E % Over Pace: 8% 2% 4% 39 2 4 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 3 10 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 * % In Pace: 76% 98% 86% 37 4 3 37 X X X X X X X 7 *
36 3 0 36 X X X 3 % Under Pace: 16% 0% 10%
35 2 2 35 X X X X 4
34 3 0 34 X X X 3 Average Speed: 41 MPH 40 MPH 41 MPH
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 40 MPH 41 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 43 MPH 44 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 509 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Lugonia Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Tennessee Street - Texas Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 1 48 X 1
47 2 1 47 X X X 3 Date:
46 1 3 46 X X X X 4
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 Time
43 5 5 43 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * From: 9:50
42 5 1 42 X X X X X X 6 *
41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time
40 1 5 40 X X X X X X 6 P To: 10:15
39 3 5 39 X X X X X X X X 8 A
38 1 5 38 X X X X X X 6 C Existing
37 6 3 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 E Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 7 4 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
35 6 5 35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
34 4 1 34 X X X X X 5 *
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 3 1 32 X X X X 4
31 0 1 31 X 1 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics
30 1 0 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 10% 10% 13%
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0 % In Pace: 80% 84% 80%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 10% 6% 7%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 38 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 35 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 510 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Lugonia Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Texas Street - Orange Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 10:20
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 10:40
49 1 2 49 X X X 3
48 2 2 48 X X X X 4 Existing
47 3 0 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 2 1 46 X X X 3
45 3 5 45 X X X X X X X X 8 *
44 3 2 44 X X X X X 5 *
43 7 4 43 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 *
42 4 9 42 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 P
41 7 5 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 3 40 X X X X X X X 7 C % Over Pace: 16% 8% 13%
39 0 5 39 X X X X X 5 E
38 4 7 38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % In Pace: 76% 84% 80% 37 3 1 37 X X X X 4 *
36 3 1 36 X X X X 4 * % Under Pace: 8% 8% 7%
35 2 1 35 X X X 3
34 0 0 34 0 Average Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH
33 1 2 33 X X X 3
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 511 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Mariposa Drive
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Wabash Avenue - Country Club Drive 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:00
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 1:10
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0 Existing
47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0
43 0 0 43 0
42 5 0 42 X X X X X 5
41 1 1 41 X X 2 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 0 1 40 X 1 % Over Pace: 14% 8% 12%
39 1 2 39 X X X 3
38 5 3 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 64% 62% 63%
37 4 5 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
36 1 2 36 X X X 3 * % Under Pace: 22% 30% 25%
35 1 4 35 X X X X X 5 P
34 5 0 34 X X X X X 5 A Average Speed: 34 MPH 31 MPH 33 MPH 33 6 1 33 X X X X X X X 7 C
32 3 7 32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 E Pace Speed: 30 - 39 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 31 3 2 31 X X X X X 5 *
30 3 4 30 X X X X X X X 7 *
29 1 3 29 X X X X 4 * 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 26 MPH 26 MPH 26 MPH 28 1 2 28 X X X 3
27 1 2 27 X X X 3 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 26 3 4 26 X X X X X X X 7
25 5 2 25 X X X X X X X 7 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 24 0 1 24 X 1
23 0 1 23 X 1
22 0 1 22 X 1
21 0 2 21 X X 2
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/2/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 512 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Mariposa Drive
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Country Club Drive - Garden Street 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 1 0 44 X 1 Time
43 2 0 43 X X 2 From: 12:00
42 1 2 42 X X X 3
41 2 6 41 X X X X X X X X 8 * Time
40 0 1 40 X 1 * To: 12:25
39 6 2 39 X X X X X X X X 8 *
38 7 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P Existing
37 9 6 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 A Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 C
35 4 10 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E
34 1 2 34 X X X 3 *
33 3 1 33 X X X X 4 *
32 5 5 32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
31 3 1 31 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 1 3 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 12% 6% 7%
29 1 1 29 X X 2
28 0 1 28 X 1 % In Pace: 86% 82% 82%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 2% 12% 11%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 30 - 39 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 36 MPH 37 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 513 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Mariposa Drive
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Halsey Street - Dwight Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 9:00
42 0 0 42 0
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 0 0 40 0 To: 4:00
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 Existing
37 0 0 37 0 Speed Limit: N / P MPH
36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0
34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 3 32 X X X 3
31 0 1 31 X 1 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics
30 0 0 30 0 % Over Pace: 26% 16% 23%
29 0 1 29 X 1
28 1 3 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 72% 68% 61%
27 1 5 27 X X X X X X 6
26 2 3 26 X X X X X 5 % Under Pace: 2% 16% 16%
25 1 2 25 X X X 3
24 5 4 24 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Average Speed: 18 MPH 23 MPH 20 MPH 23 2 5 23 X X X X X X X 7 *
22 1 3 22 X X X X 4 * Pace Speed: 12 - 21 MPH 18 - 27 MPH 15 - 24 MPH 21 1 3 21 X X X X 4 P
20 2 2 20 X X X X 4 A
19 8 3 19 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 13 MPH 16 MPH 14 MPH 18 3 4 18 X X X X X X X 7 E
17 2 0 17 X X 2 * 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 18 MPH 23 MPH 20 MPH 16 5 3 16 X X X X X X X X 8 *
15 3 2 15 X X X X X 5 * 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 24 MPH 28 MPH 26 MPH 14 4 2 14 X X X X X X 6
13 3 1 13 X X X X 4
12 5 0 12 X X X X X 5
11 0 0 11 0
10 1 0 10 X 1
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/1/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 514 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Mountain View Avenue
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Interstate 10 - Central Avenue
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 2:15
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 0 60 0 To: 2:35
59 0 1 59 X 1
58 0 1 58 X 1 Existing
57 0 2 57 X X 2 Speed Limit: 45 MPH
56 3 2 56 X X X X X 5
55 0 3 55 X X X 3
54 3 2 54 X X X X X 5 *
53 4 6 53 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
52 5 0 52 X X X X X 5 *
51 2 4 51 X X X X X X 6 P Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 2 4 50 X X X X X X 6 A % Over Pace: 6% 18% 12%
49 7 5 49 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
48 5 3 48 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 76% 72% 74%
47 2 1 47 X X X 3 *
46 4 7 46 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % Under Pace: 18% 10% 14% 45 4 4 45 X X X X X X X X 8 *
44 1 2 44 X X X 3 Average Speed: 48 MPH 50 MPH 49 MPH
43 2 2 43 X X X X 4
42 2 0 42 X X 2 Pace Speed: 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 45 - 54 MPH 41 2 1 41 X X X 3
40 2 0 40 X X 2
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 49 MPH 49 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 53 MPH 55 MPH 54 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/9/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 515 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: New York Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Colton Avenue - Lugonia Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 9:00
52 0 3 52 X X X 3
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 9:30
49 0 2 49 X X 2
48 0 2 48 X X 2 Existing
47 1 0 47 X 1 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 4 1 46 X X X X X 5
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 4 0 44 X X X X 4 *
43 1 3 43 X X X X 4 *
42 3 6 42 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
41 3 9 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 6 3 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 A % Over Pace: 2% 20% 16% 39 6 5 39 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
38 5 3 38 X X X X X X X X 8 E % In Pace: 72% 80% 74%
37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 7 *
36 1 4 36 X X X X X 5 * % Under Pace: 26% 0% 10%
35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 *
34 1 1 34 X X 2 Average Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH
33 3 0 33 X X X 3
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 1 0 31 X 1
30 3 0 30 X X X 3
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 37 MPH 35 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 48 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/9/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 516 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Olive Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Citrus Avenue - San Mateo Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 9:15
42 0 0 42 0
41 1 0 41 X 1 Time
40 0 0 40 0 To: 9:35
39 0 2 39 X X 2
38 1 0 38 X 1 Existing
37 1 2 37 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 3 5 36 X X X X X X X X 8 *
35 2 5 35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 3 0 34 X X X 3 *
33 10 2 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
32 2 10 32 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
31 12 6 31 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 18 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 6 9 30 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E % Over Pace: 6% 8% 7% 29 3 3 29 X X X X X X 6 *
28 1 3 28 X X X X 4 * % In Pace: 90% 92% 91%
27 3 3 27 X X X X X X 6 *
26 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 4% 0% 2%
25 1 0 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 32 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 32 MPH 31 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/2/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 517 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Olive Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: San Mateo Street - Terracina Boulevard 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 2 0 46 X X 2
45 0 1 45 X 1
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 2 5 43 X X X X X X X 7 * From: 9:35
42 2 4 42 X X X X X X 6 *
41 2 2 41 X X X X 4 * Time
40 2 5 40 X X X X X X X 7 P To: 10:05
39 2 4 39 X X X X X X 6 A
38 6 1 38 X X X X X X X 7 C Existing
37 4 8 37 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 E Speed Limit: 35 MPH 36 5 4 36 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
35 3 7 35 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
34 3 3 34 X X X X X X 6 *
33 5 1 33 X X X X X X 6
32 3 3 32 X X X X X X 6
31 3 1 31 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 4 1 30 X X X X X 5 % Over Pace: 20% 2% 3%
29 1 0 29 X 1
28 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 76% 86% 74%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 4% 12% 23%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 30 - 39 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 34 MPH 32 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/2/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 518 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Orange Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Lugonia Avenue - Pioneer Avenue
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 10:40
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 11:00
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0 Existing
47 2 0 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 0 0 46 0
45 2 4 45 X X X X X X 6 *
44 2 5 44 X X X X X X X 7 *
43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 4 7 42 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
41 6 7 41 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 6 5 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C % Over Pace: 4% 0% 2% 39 11 4 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 15 E
38 5 2 38 X X X X X X X 7 * % In Pace: 88% 88% 88%
37 1 4 37 X X X X X 5 *
36 4 3 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 8% 12% 10%
35 2 2 35 X X X X 4
34 0 2 34 X X 2 Average Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH
33 2 0 33 X X 2
32 0 2 32 X X 2 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 41 MPH 40 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 44 MPH 43 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 519 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Orange Street
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Pioneer Avenue - Hubbard Court
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 11:00
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 11:20
49 1 1 49 X X 2
48 1 1 48 X X 2 Existing
47 3 1 47 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: 45 MPH
46 3 2 46 X X X X X 5
45 3 5 45 X X X X X X X X 8 *
44 3 1 44 X X X X 4 *
43 5 4 43 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
42 3 3 42 X X X X X X 6 P
41 3 5 41 X X X X X X X X 8 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 40 3 6 40 X X X X X X X X X 9 C % Over Pace: 10% 10% 13% 39 6 8 39 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 E
38 6 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * % In Pace: 78% 86% 82% 37 4 2 37 X X X X X X 6 *
36 3 4 36 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 12% 4% 5%
35 0 1 35 X 1
34 1 0 34 X 1 Average Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 1 0 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 37 - 46 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 31 0 1 31 X 1
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 45 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 520 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Orange Street
75 0 0 75 0
74 0 0 74 0
73 0 0 73 0 Between: Hubbard Court - City Limits
72 0 0 72 0
71 0 0 71 0
70 0 0 70 0 Weather: Clear
69 0 0 69 0
68 0 0 68 0
67 0 0 67 0 Date:
66 0 0 66 0
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0 Time
63 0 0 63 0 From: 11:25
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0 Time
60 0 1 60 X 1 To: 11:45
59 0 0 59 0
58 1 0 58 X 1 Existing
57 0 2 57 X X 2 Speed Limit: 50 MPH
56 2 2 56 X X X X 4
55 3 3 55 X X X X X X 6 *
54 2 4 54 X X X X X X 6 *
53 4 6 53 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
52 2 6 52 X X X X X X X X 8 P
51 5 9 51 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 14 A Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 50 6 7 50 X X X X X X X X X X X X X 13 C % Over Pace: 6% 2% 8% 49 6 2 49 X X X X X X X X 8 E
48 6 4 48 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % In Pace: 86% 90% 87% 47 5 0 47 X X X X X 5 *
46 4 3 46 X X X X X X X 7 * % Under Pace: 8% 8% 5%
45 3 1 45 X X X X 4
44 0 0 44 0 Average Speed: 50 MPH 52 MPH 51 MPH
43 1 0 43 X 1
42 0 0 42 0 Pace Speed: 46 - 55 MPH 48 - 57 MPH 46 - 55 MPH 41 0 0 41 0
40 0 0 40 0
39 0 0 39 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 38 0 0 38 0
37 0 0 37 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 49 MPH 51 MPH 51 MPH 36 0 0 36 0
35 0 0 35 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 54 MPH 55 MPH 54 MPH 34 0 0 34 0
33 0 0 33 0
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 0 31 0
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 0 29 0
28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 521 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Orange Tree Lane
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: California Street - Nevada Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 2 46 X X 2
45 1 0 45 X 1
44 0 1 44 X 1 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 2:40
42 1 1 42 X X 2
41 1 2 41 X X X 3 Time
40 3 3 40 X X X X X X 6 To: 3:00
39 3 3 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 * Existing
37 3 4 37 X X X X X X X 7 * Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 3 8 36 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
35 1 2 35 X X X 3 A
34 5 6 34 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
33 4 2 33 X X X X X X 6 E
32 6 4 32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
31 6 2 31 X X X X X X X X 8 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 7 3 30 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * % Over Pace: 12% 8% 15% 29 2 1 29 X X X 3
28 2 2 28 X X X X 4 % In Pace: 78% 74% 76%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 10% 18% 9%
25 1 1 25 X X 2
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 30 - 39 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 30 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 36 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/9/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 522 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Orange Tree Lane
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Nevada Street - Alabama Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 1:50
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 2:40
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 5 4 48 X X X X X X X X X 9 Existing
47 0 0 47 0 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
46 1 1 46 X X 2
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 1 2 44 X X X 3
43 5 3 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 4 2 42 X X X X X X 6 *
41 4 3 41 X X X X X X X 7 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 4 40 X X X X X X X 7 P % Over Pace: 16% 14% 18%
39 3 2 39 X X X X X 5 A
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 C % In Pace: 72% 58% 65%
37 4 5 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
36 4 4 36 X X X X X X X X 8 * % Under Pace: 12% 28% 17% 35 3 1 35 X X X X 4 *
34 4 2 34 X X X X X X 6 * Average Speed: 39 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 33 1 2 33 X X X 3
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 31 2 3 31 X X X X X 5
30 1 1 30 X X 2
29 0 1 29 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 32 MPH 33 MPH 28 0 1 28 X 1
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 44 MPH 45 MPH 44 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/9/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 523 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Pacific Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Crescent Avenue - Carob Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 9:00
42 0 0 42 0
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 0 0 40 0 To: 12:15
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 Existing
37 0 0 37 0 Speed Limit: 25 MPH
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 *
35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 *
34 3 0 34 X X X 3 *
33 2 1 33 X X X 3 P
32 4 1 32 X X X X X 5 A
31 3 1 31 X X X X 4 C Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 0 3 30 X X X 3 E % Over Pace: 0% 18% 0%
29 2 3 29 X X X X X 5 *
28 6 3 28 X X X X X X X X X 9 * % In Pace: 78% 66% 68%
27 3 5 27 X X X X X X X X 8 *
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 22% 16% 32%
25 1 2 25 X X X 3
24 2 3 24 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 29 MPH 27 MPH 28 MPH 23 1 1 23 X X 2
22 3 3 22 X X X X X X 6 Pace Speed: 27 - 36 MPH 22 - 31 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 1 1 21 X X 2
20 0 1 20 X 1
19 0 1 19 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 24 MPH 21 MPH 22 MPH 18 0 1 18 X 1
17 0 1 17 X 1 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 27 MPH 28 MPH 16 0 1 16 X 1
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 36 38 GRAND TOTALS 74
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/1/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 524 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed NB SB VEH. Location: Pacific Street
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Carob Street - Ridge Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 12:15
42 0 0 42 0
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 0 0 40 0 To: 3:30
39 0 0 39 0
38 0 0 38 0 Existing
37 0 0 37 0 Speed Limit: 20 MPH
36 0 0 36 0
35 3 0 35 X X X 3
34 1 2 34 X X X 3
33 1 0 33 X 1
32 0 0 32 0
31 0 2 31 X X 2 Northbound Southbound Combined Statistics 30 2 1 30 X X X 3 % Over Pace: 13% 15% 16%
29 4 0 29 X X X X 4 *
28 2 2 28 X X X X 4 * % In Pace: 65% 82% 70%
27 1 4 27 X X X X X 5 *
26 1 4 26 X X X X X 5 P % Under Pace: 23% 3% 14%
25 3 3 25 X X X X X X 6 A
24 5 4 24 X X X X X X X X X 9 C Average Speed: 25 MPH 25 MPH 25 MPH 23 4 4 23 X X X X X X X X 8 E
22 3 0 22 X X X 3 * Pace Speed: 21 - 30 MPH 19 - 28 MPH 20 - 29 MPH 21 1 3 21 X X X X 4 *
20 2 2 20 X X X X 4 *
19 2 2 19 X X X X 4 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 19 MPH 21 MPH 20 MPH 18 3 0 18 X X X 3
17 2 1 17 X X X 3 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 24 MPH 25 MPH 24 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 28 MPH 30 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 40 34 GRAND TOTALS 74
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Northbound Southbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/1/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 525 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Palm Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Serpentine Drive - San Mateo Street 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 1 0 44 X 1 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 12:20
42 3 0 42 X X X 3
41 1 2 41 X X X 3 Time
40 1 0 40 X 1 To: 1:45
39 1 0 39 X 1
38 0 2 38 X X 2 Existing
37 5 1 37 X X X X X X 6 * Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 6 6 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
35 1 2 35 X X X 3 *
34 3 7 34 X X X X X X X X X X 10 P
33 5 5 33 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
32 4 5 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
31 1 3 31 X X X X 4 E Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 2 4 30 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 14% 10% 11%
29 2 3 29 X X X X X 5 *
28 5 3 28 X X X X X X X X 8 * % In Pace: 68% 80% 73%
27 3 2 27 X X X X X 5
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 18% 10% 16%
25 3 2 25 X X X X X 5
24 1 2 24 X X X 3 Average Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 32 MPH
23 1 0 23 X 1
22 1 0 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 28 - 37 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 28 - 37 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 28 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 33 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 36 MPH 37 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/9/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 526 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Palm Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: San Mateo Street - Ford Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 11:50
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 0 50 0 To: 12:20
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 2 48 X X 2 Existing
47 0 1 47 X 1 Speed Limit: 40 MPH
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 2 2 45 X X X X 4
44 2 1 44 X X X 3
43 4 2 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 3 5 42 X X X X X X X X 8 *
41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 3 8 40 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P % Over Pace: 8% 14% 11% 39 5 3 39 X X X X X X X X 8 A
38 5 5 38 X X X X X X X X X X 10 C % In Pace: 74% 76% 75% 37 2 2 37 X X X X 4 E
36 4 2 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 18% 10% 14%
35 6 3 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
34 3 4 34 X X X X X X X 7 * Average Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH 33 4 1 33 X X X X X 5
32 3 2 32 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 31 1 0 31 X 1
30 0 2 30 X X 2
29 1 0 29 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 40 MPH 38 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 43 MPH 43 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/9/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 527 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Palmetto Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Nevada Street - California Street
62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 3:05
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0 Time
50 0 1 50 X 1 To: 3:45
49 2 3 49 X X X X X 5
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 0 2 47 X X 2 Speed Limit: 30 MPH
46 1 0 46 X 1
45 3 3 45 X X X X X X 6
44 0 1 44 X 1
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 *
42 5 3 42 X X X X X X X X 8 *
41 4 6 41 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 4 1 40 X X X X X 5 P % Over Pace: 14% 22% 19%
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 A
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 C % In Pace: 68% 54% 61%
37 4 2 37 X X X X X X 6 E
36 3 2 36 X X X X X 5 * % Under Pace: 18% 24% 20%
35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 3 1 34 X X X X 4 * Average Speed: 38 MPH 39 MPH 39 MPH 33 0 1 33 X 1
32 3 2 32 X X X X X 5 Pace Speed: 34 - 43 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 34 - 43 MPH 31 2 2 31 X X X X 4
30 2 0 30 X X 2
29 2 2 29 X X X X 4 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 31 MPH 32 MPH 28 0 1 28 X 1
27 0 2 27 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 39 MPH 40 MPH 39 MPH 26 0 1 26 X 1
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 47 MPH 45 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/9/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 528 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Palmetto Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: California Street - Marigold Avenue 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 0 53 0 From: 10:10
52 1 1 52 X X 2
51 2 0 51 X X 2 Time
50 0 2 50 X X 2 To: 11:25
49 0 1 49 X 1
48 0 1 48 X 1 Existing
47 2 1 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: N / P MPH
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 1 1 45 X X 2
44 1 2 44 X X X 3 *
43 3 3 43 X X X X X X 6 *
42 4 4 42 X X X X X X X X 8 *
41 1 5 41 X X X X X X 6 P Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 1 2 40 X X X 3 A % Over Pace: 32% 16% 14%
39 4 1 39 X X X X X 5 C
38 2 1 38 X X X 3 E % In Pace: 56% 56% 53%
37 4 5 37 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
36 1 2 36 X X X 3 * % Under Pace: 12% 28% 33%
35 4 3 35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 1 2 34 X X X 3 Average Speed: 37 MPH 39 MPH 38 MPH
33 2 0 33 X X 2
32 3 4 32 X X X X X X X 7 Pace Speed: 30 - 39 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 31 2 4 31 X X X X X X 6
30 5 1 30 X X X X X X 6
29 2 1 29 X X X 3 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 31 MPH 30 MPH 28 1 2 28 X X X 3
27 2 0 27 X X 2 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 1 0 25 X 1 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 43 MPH 45 MPH 44 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/8/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 529 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Palo Alto Drive
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Country Club Drive - Mirasol Drive 52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 3 0 45 X X X 3
44 0 1 44 X 1 Time
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 From: 9:00
42 1 2 42 X X X 3
41 0 2 41 X X 2 Time
40 5 2 40 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 11:00
39 2 3 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 * Existing
37 1 3 37 X X X X 4 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 3 36 X X X X X 5 A
35 2 9 35 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C
34 6 1 34 X X X X X X X 7 E
33 5 2 33 X X X X X X X 7 *
32 1 2 32 X X X 3 *
31 2 4 31 X X X X X X 6 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 2 4 30 X X X X X X 6 % Over Pace: 12% 18% 13%
29 3 1 29 X X X X 4
28 2 0 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 56% 66% 59%
27 3 0 27 X X X 3
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 32% 16% 28%
25 0 1 25 X 1
24 2 2 24 X X X X 4 Average Speed: 34 MPH 34 MPH 34 MPH 23 2 1 23 X X X 3
22 1 0 22 X 1 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 30 - 39 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 1 1 21 X X 2
20 0 1 20 X 1
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 27 MPH 29 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 34 MPH 35 MPH 34 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 40 MPH 40 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/9/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 530 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Palo Alto Drive
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Mirasol Drive - Sunset Drive
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 0 0 43 0 From: 11:00
42 0 0 42 0
41 0 0 41 0 Time
40 0 0 40 0 To: 1:15
39 3 1 39 X X X X 4
38 2 3 38 X X X X X 5 Existing
37 4 1 37 X X X X X 5 Speed Limit: 25 MPH
36 2 3 36 X X X X X 5
35 1 2 35 X X X 3 *
34 1 5 34 X X X X X X 6 *
33 9 3 33 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 *
32 5 6 32 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 P
31 3 5 31 X X X X X X X X 8 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 6 5 30 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 C % Over Pace: 6% 10% 19% 29 5 1 29 X X X X X X 6 E
28 2 3 28 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 76% 76% 74%
27 1 5 27 X X X X X X 6 *
26 3 3 26 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 18% 14% 7%
25 1 1 25 X X 2
24 2 1 24 X X X 3 Average Speed: 32 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH
23 0 1 23 X 1
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 26 - 35 MPH 21 0 1 21 X 1
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 28 MPH 27 MPH 27 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 31 MPH 32 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 37 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/9/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 531 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Pennsylvania Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Texas Street - Orange Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 2 48 X X 2
47 0 2 47 X X 2 Date:
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 3 44 X X X 3 Time
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 From: 10:50
42 0 4 42 X X X X 4
41 0 2 41 X X 2 Time
40 3 3 40 X X X X X X 6 To: 11:30
39 0 2 39 X X 2
38 5 2 38 X X X X X X X 7 * Existing
37 2 2 37 X X X X 4 * Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 *
35 7 5 35 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 P
34 3 3 34 X X X X X X 6 A
33 3 1 33 X X X X 4 C
32 2 3 32 X X X X X 5 E
31 6 3 31 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 5 2 30 X X X X X X X 7 * % Over Pace: 10% 10% 25%
29 3 2 29 X X X X X 5 *
28 1 2 28 X X X 3 % In Pace: 76% 52% 63%
27 1 2 27 X X X 3
26 1 0 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 14% 38% 12%
25 2 0 25 X X 2
24 2 1 24 X X X 3 Average Speed: 33 MPH 37 MPH 35 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 35 - 44 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 30 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 36 MPH 35 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 44 MPH 41 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/1/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 532 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Pennsylvania Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Orange Street - Church Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 2 0 44 X X 2 Time
43 2 1 43 X X X 3 From: 11:30
42 2 1 42 X X X 3
41 1 1 41 X X 2 Time
40 2 1 40 X X X 3 To: 12:30
39 3 2 39 X X X X X 5
38 5 3 38 X X X X X X X X 8 * Existing
37 1 3 37 X X X X 4 * Speed Limit: 30 MPH
36 4 2 36 X X X X X X 6 *
35 3 2 35 X X X X X 5 P
34 2 5 34 X X X X X X X 7 A
33 3 4 33 X X X X X X X 7 C
32 3 6 32 X X X X X X X X X 9 E
31 5 6 31 X X X X X X X X X X X 11 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 3 30 X X X X X X 6 * % Over Pace: 24% 12% 18%
29 4 4 29 X X X X X X X X 8 *
28 3 2 28 X X X X X 5 % In Pace: 66% 76% 71%
27 0 1 27 X 1
26 0 2 26 X X 2 % Under Pace: 10% 12% 11%
25 2 1 25 X X X 3
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 35 MPH 33 MPH 34 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 29 - 38 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 29 - 38 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 29 MPH 29 MPH 29 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 32 MPH 33 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/1/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 533 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Pennsylvania Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Church Street - University Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 0 46 0
45 0 0 45 0
44 0 0 44 0 Time
43 4 0 43 X X X X 4 From: 12:30
42 3 0 42 X X X 3
41 0 1 41 X 1 Time
40 3 4 40 X X X X X X X 7 To: 1:35
39 3 2 39 X X X X X 5
38 1 3 38 X X X X 4 Existing
37 2 0 37 X X 2 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 1 3 36 X X X X 4 *
35 3 4 35 X X X X X X X 7 *
34 4 5 34 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
33 4 3 33 X X X X X X X 7 P
32 4 6 32 X X X X X X X X X X 10 A
31 6 3 31 X X X X X X X X X 9 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 5 2 30 X X X X X X X 7 E % Over Pace: 20% 20% 26%
29 1 4 29 X X X X X 5 *
28 1 3 28 X X X X 4 * % In Pace: 66% 74% 69%
27 3 4 27 X X X X X X X 7 *
26 0 1 26 X 1 % Under Pace: 14% 6% 5%
25 2 2 25 X X X X 4
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 34 MPH 33 MPH 33 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 30 - 39 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 27 - 36 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 30 MPH 28 MPH 28 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 32 MPH 33 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 38 MPH 39 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/1/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 534 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Pennsylvania Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: University Street - Judson Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 1 50 X 1 Weather: Clear
49 0 2 49 X X 2
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 0 0 45 0
44 2 1 44 X X X 3 Time
43 1 2 43 X X X 3 From: 2:20
42 4 2 42 X X X X X X 6
41 2 4 41 X X X X X X 6 Time
40 4 1 40 X X X X X 5 * To: 3:10
39 1 3 39 X X X X 4 *
38 4 1 38 X X X X X 5 * Existing
37 3 2 37 X X X X X 5 P Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 4 8 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 A
35 3 6 35 X X X X X X X X X 9 C
34 3 2 34 X X X X X 5 E
33 4 5 33 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
32 4 0 32 X X X X 4 *
31 4 5 31 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 4 1 30 X X X X X 5 % Over Pace: 18% 14% 22%
29 1 1 29 X X 2
28 1 1 28 X X 2 % In Pace: 68% 68% 67%
27 0 1 27 X 1
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 14% 18% 11%
25 1 0 25 X 1
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 36 MPH 37 MPH 36 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 31 - 40 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 31 - 40 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 31 MPH 31 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 35 MPH 36 MPH 36 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
9/1/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 535 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Pioneer Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Texas Street - Orange Street
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 0 50 0 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 0 48 0
47 0 0 47 0 Date:
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 0 3 45 X X X 3
44 4 0 44 X X X X 4 Time
43 2 3 43 X X X X X 5 From: 12:30
42 3 4 42 X X X X X X X 7
41 3 2 41 X X X X X 5 * Time
40 2 5 40 X X X X X X X 7 * To: 1:10
39 3 2 39 X X X X X 5 *
38 3 5 38 X X X X X X X X 8 P Existing
37 5 2 37 X X X X X X X 7 A Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 4 8 36 X X X X X X X X X X X X 12 C
35 3 3 35 X X X X X X 6 E
34 4 5 34 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
33 1 4 33 X X X X X 5 *
32 7 1 32 X X X X X X X X 8 *
31 2 1 31 X X X 3 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 3 1 30 X X X X 4 % Over Pace: 18% 14% 20%
29 0 0 29 0
28 1 0 28 X 1 % In Pace: 70% 80% 72%
27 0 0 27 0
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 12% 6% 8%
25 0 0 25 0
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 37 MPH 38 MPH 37 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 32 - 41 MPH 33 - 42 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 32 MPH 34 MPH 32 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 536 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Pioneer Avenue
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0
53 0 0 53 0 Between: Orange Street - Occidental Drive
52 0 0 52 0
51 0 0 51 0
50 0 1 50 X 1 Weather: Clear
49 0 0 49 0
48 0 1 48 X 1
47 0 2 47 X X 2 Date:
46 0 1 46 X 1
45 2 1 45 X X X 3
44 1 3 44 X X X X 4 Time
43 2 0 43 X X 2 From: 1:10
42 2 4 42 X X X X X X 6
41 5 4 41 X X X X X X X X X 9 * Time
40 7 3 40 X X X X X X X X X X 10 * To: 1:40
39 5 4 39 X X X X X X X X X 9 *
38 5 1 38 X X X X X X 6 P Existing
37 4 4 37 X X X X X X X X 8 A Speed Limit: 35 MPH
36 2 2 36 X X X X 4 C
35 2 1 35 X X X 3 E
34 3 2 34 X X X X X 5 *
33 3 1 33 X X X X 4 *
32 3 4 32 X X X X X X X 7 *
31 2 2 31 X X X X 4 Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 30 0 1 30 X 1 % Over Pace: 14% 10% 20%
29 2 4 29 X X X X X X 6
28 0 1 28 X 1 % In Pace: 78% 52% 65%
27 0 1 27 X 1
26 0 0 26 0 % Under Pace: 8% 38% 15%
25 0 2 25 X X 2
24 0 0 24 0 Average Speed: 38 MPH 37 MPH 37 MPH
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0 Pace Speed: 32 - 41 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 32 - 41 MPH 21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 33 MPH 29 MPH 31 MPH 18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 38 MPH 37 MPH 38 MPH 16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 41 MPH 44 MPH 42 MPH 14 0 0 14 0
13 0 0 13 0
12 0 0 12 0
11 0 0 11 0
10 0 0 10 0
9 0 0 9 0
8 0 0 8 0
7 0 0 7 0
6 0 0 6 0
5 0 0 5 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 537 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Pioneer Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Occidental Drive - Dearborn Street 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 1 0 55 X 1
54 1 2 54 X X X 3 Time
53 1 0 53 X 1 From: 1:40
52 0 1 52 X 1
51 0 2 51 X X 2 Time
50 1 2 50 X X X 3 To: 2:20
49 2 0 49 X X 2
48 4 1 48 X X X X X 5 Existing
47 3 0 47 X X X 3 Speed Limit: 35 MPH
46 3 3 46 X X X X X X 6 *
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 3 1 44 X X X X 4 *
43 1 6 43 X X X X X X X 7 P
42 3 4 42 X X X X X X X 7 A
41 2 3 41 X X X X X 5 C Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 2 3 40 X X X X X 5 E % Over Pace: 32% 16% 21%
39 4 2 39 X X X X X X 6 *
38 2 2 38 X X X X 4 * % In Pace: 60% 60% 58%
37 4 3 37 X X X X X X X 7 *
36 5 1 36 X X X X X X 6 % Under Pace: 8% 24% 21%
35 1 2 35 X X X 3
34 1 4 34 X X X X X 5 Average Speed: 42 MPH 41 MPH 42 MPH 33 1 1 33 X X 2
32 0 1 32 X 1 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 37 - 46 MPH 31 0 2 31 X X 2
30 1 1 30 X X 2
29 0 0 29 0 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 42 MPH 42 MPH 42 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 48 MPH 48 MPH 48 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Counts Unlimited, Inc.

PO Box 1178
8/31/21
Redlands Regular Meeting of 11-15-2022 Page 538 of 1131 MPH Vehicles Surveyed TOT.

Speed EB WB VEH. Location: Pioneer Avenue
65 0 0 65 0
64 0 0 64 0
63 0 0 63 0 Between: Texas Street - Interstate 210 Freeway 62 0 0 62 0
61 0 0 61 0
60 0 0 60 0 Weather: Clear
59 0 0 59 0
58 0 0 58 0
57 0 0 57 0 Date:
56 0 0 56 0
55 0 0 55 0
54 0 0 54 0 Time
53 0 1 53 X 1 From: 11:50
52 0 1 52 X 1
51 1 1 51 X X 2 Time
50 1 1 50 X X 2 To: 12:30
49 1 3 49 X X X X 4
48 1 2 48 X X X 3 Existing
47 2 2 47 X X X X 4 Speed Limit: N / P MPH
46 2 1 46 X X X 3
45 4 3 45 X X X X X X X 7 *
44 3 7 44 X X X X X X X X X X 10 *
43 4 4 43 X X X X X X X X 8 *
42 3 2 42 X X X X X 5 P
41 3 1 41 X X X X 4 A Eastbound Westbound Combined Statistics 40 6 1 40 X X X X X X X 7 C % Over Pace: 16% 14% 20%
39 3 5 39 X X X X X X X X 8 E
38 4 1 38 X X X X X 5 * % In Pace: 70% 56% 63%
37 2 1 37 X X X 3 *
36 3 3 36 X X X X X X 6 * % Under Pace: 14% 30% 17%
35 4 1 35 X X X X X 5
34 1 2 34 X X X 3 Average Speed: 41 MPH 41 MPH 41 MPH
33 0 3 33 X X X 3
32 1 2 32 X X X 3 Pace Speed: 36 - 45 MPH 39 - 48 MPH 36 - 45 MPH 31 1 1 31 X X 2
30 0 0 30 0
29 0 1 29 X 1 15th Percentile / Critical Speed: 36 MPH 34 MPH 35 MPH 28 0 0 28 0
27 0 0 27 0 50th Percentile / Critical Speed: 40 MPH 43 MPH 41 MPH 26 0 0 26 0
25 0 0 25 0 85th Percentile / Critical Speed: 46 MPH 48 MPH 47 MPH 24 0 0 24 0
23 0 0 23 0
22 0 0 22 0
21 0 0 21 0
20 0 0 20 0
19 0 0 19 0
18 0 0 18 0
17 0 0 17 0
16 0 0 16 0
15 0 0 15 0
Total 50 50 GRAND TOTALS 100
Corona, CA 92880
T 951-268-6268 F 951-268-6267
Eastbound Westbound
City of Redlands
Radar Speed Survey
Radar Survey Conducted By:

Redlands City CouncilNovember 15, 2022

Redlands City Council
November 15, 2022