Agenda packet — Redlands City Council, November 18, 2025 (part 2 of 4)

In addition, the Morongo Band of Mission Indians requested consultation and provided their mitigation measures to be incorporated into the Proposed Project (MM TCR-3 through MM TCR-8).

Based on consultation with the tribes, the Project area has the potential for discovery of buried cultural resources. Therefore, the following mitigation measure provided by the tribe(s) shall be implemented, thus the Project would have less than significant impacts with mitigations incorporated.

MM TCR-1 The Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation Cultural Resources Management Department (YSMN) shall be contacted, as detailed in CUL -1, of any pre-contact cultural resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a Cultural Resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with YSMN, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents YSMN for the remainder of the project, should YSMN elect to place a monitor on-site.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
285 of 932
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
City of Redlands, CA
Chambers Group, Inc. 56
21532
MM TCR-2 Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the Project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to YSMN. The Lead Agency and/or applicant shall, in good faith, consult with YSMN throughout the life of the Project.

MM TCR-3 Native American Treatment Agreement. Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall enter into a Tribal Monitoring Agreement with the Morongo Band of Mission Indians for the Project. The Tribal Monitor(s) shall be on -site during all ground -disturbing activities (including, but not limited to, clearing, grubbing, tree and bush removal, grading, trenching, fence post placement and removal, construction excavation, excavation for all utility and irrigation lines, and landscaping phases of any kind). The Tribal Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert, redirect, or halt the ground -disturbing activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources and/or tribal cultural resources.

MM TCR-4 Cultural Resource Management Plan . Prior to any ground -disturbing activities the project archaeologist shall develop a Cultural Resource Management Plan (CRMP) and/or Archaeological Monitoring and Treatment Plan (AMTP) to address the details, timing, and responsibilities of all archaeological and cultural resource activities that occur on the project site. This Plan shall be written in consultation with the Consulting Tribe[s] and at minimum, shall include the following: (1) the approved Mitigation Measures (MM)/Conditions of Approval (COA), (2) procedures for each MM/COA, (3) the contact information for all pertinent parties, (4) parties’ responsibilities, and (5) an overview of the project schedule.

MM TCR-5 Pre-Grade Meeting. The retained qualified archeologist and Consulting Tribe[s] representative shall attend the pre -grade meeting with the grading contractors to explain and coordinate the requirements of the monitoring plan.

MM TCR-6 Inadvertent Discovery of Cultural Resources . In the event that previously unidentified cultural resources are discovered /unearthed during construction, the qualified archaeologist and the Tribal Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert and/or temporarily halt ground -disturbance activities in the area of discovery to allow for the evaluation of potentially significant cultural resources. Isolates and clearly non -significant deposits shall be minimally documented in the field and co llected so the monitored ground -disturbing activity can proceed.

If a potentially significant cultural resource(s) is discovered, work shall stop within a 60-foot perimeter of the discovery and an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) physical demarcation/barrier constructed. All work shall be diverted away from the vici nity of the find(s), so that it/they can be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal Monitor[s]. The archaeologist shall notify the Lead Agency and Consulting Tribe[s] of said discovery. The qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the Lead Agency, the Consulting Tribe[s], and the Tribal monitor, shall determine the significance of the discovered resource. A Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
286 of 932
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
City of Redlands, CA
Chambers Group, Inc. 57
21532
recommendation for the treatment and disposition of the Tribal Cultural Resource shall be made by the qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Tribe[s] and the Tribal monitor[s] and be submitted to the Lead Agency for review and approval.

Below are the possible treatments and dispositions of significant cultural resources in order of CEQA preference:

A. Full avoidance.

B. If avoidance is not feasible, Preservation in place.

If Preservation in place is not feasible, all items shall be reburied in an area away from any future impacts and reside in a permanent conservation easement or Deed Restriction.

C. If all other options are proven to be infeasible, data recovery through excavation and then curation in a Curation Facility that meets the Federal Curation Standards (36 CFR 79).

Unless otherwise agreed upon by all parties, all removed items from the Project shall be temporarily curated on -site in a secure and locked location (i.e., Conex box, a lockable office or drawer with restricted access to it, etc.). A periodic inventory must be maintained and provided to Consulting Tribe[s].

MM TCR-7 Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains. The Morongo Band of Mission Indians requests the following specific conditions to be imposed in order to protect Native American human remains and/or cremations. No photographs are to be taken except by the coroner, with written approval by the Consulting Tribe[s].

The area shall be protected by the esta blishment of an ESA with a marked boundary. Project personnel/observers will be restricted from entry into the ESA.

The County Coroner is to be contacted within 24 hours of discovery. The County Coroner has 48 hours to make his/her determination pursuant to State and Safety Code §7050.5. and Public Resources Code (PRC) § 5097.98.

B. In the event that the human remains and/or cremations are identified as Native American, the Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours of determination pursuant to subdivision (c) of HSC §7050.5.

C. The NAHC shall immediately notify the person or persons it believes to be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD has 48 hours, upon being granted access Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
287 of 932
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
City of Redlands, CA
Chambers Group, Inc. 58
21532
to the Project site, to inspect the site of discovery and make his/her recommendation for final treatment and disposition, with appropriate dignity, of the remains and all associated grave goods pursuant to PRC §5097.98 D. If the Morongo Band of Mission Indians has been named the MLD or Co-MLD, the Tribe may wish to rebury the human remains and/or cremation and sacred items in their place of discovery with no further disturbance where they will reside in perpetuity. The place(s) of reburial will not be disclosed by any party and is exempt from the California Public Records Act (California Government Code § 6254[r]). Reburial location of human remains and/or cremations will be determined by the Tribe’s MLD, the landowner, a nd the City Planning Department.

MM TCR-8 FINAL REPORT: The final report[s] created as a part of the project (CRMP/AMTP, isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be submitted to the Lead Agency and Consulting Tribe[s] for review and comment.

After approval of all parties, th e final reports are to be submitted to the appropriate Information Center (IC), and the Consulting Tribe[s].

4.19 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS

19. UTILITIES/SERVICE SYSTEMS.

Would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or
storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or
telecommunications facilities , the construction or
relocation of which could cause significant
environmental effects?

(b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future
development during normal, dry and multiple dry
years?

(c) Result in a determination by the wastewater
treatment provider which serves or may serve the
project that it has adequate capacity to serve the
project’s projected demand in addition to the
provider’s existing commitments?

(d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local
standards, or in excess of the capacity of local
infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of
solid waste reduction goals?

(e) Comply with federal, state, and local management
and reduction statutes and regulations related to
solid wastes?

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
288 of 932
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
City of Redlands, CA
Chambers Group, Inc. 59
21532

4.19.1 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or stormwater drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunication s facilities, the construction or expansion of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact . There are existing utility infrastructures within the Project area for telecommunications, electric, natural gas, and wastewater treatment. The Proposed Project will connect to existing utility services during operations. No off-site expansions are proposed.

The Proposed Project will install a new water tank on City property to increase water storage in the City. The intent of the Proposed Project is to provide recycled water for City use; it would not be used to meet demand due to population growth. meet the critical public drinking recycled water demands as the City continues to be impacted by a multi -decade drought . The City’s Municipal Utilities Department operates and maintains a water distribution system with an approximately 54.5-million- gallon maximum s torage capacity (City 2025 a). The Proposed Project would increase the existing capacity by 2.75 MG and will utilize existing infrastructure for water distribution.

The Proposed Project would result in an increase of impervious surfaces to the area causing additional runoff. As previously discussed, the Proposed Project will comply with the NDPES Program by implementing SWPPP BMPs to address additional runoff. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal dry and multiple dry years? Less than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project would not result in requiring a significant increase in water supplies as there is no increase in personnel expected at the Project site. There is existing landscaping on the Project site that already requires irrigation. Any additional landscaping for the Proposed Project would involve a minimal increase in water usage for irrigation. In fact, the Proposed Project would install an additional water tank to increase the City’s water storage. No additional expansions or new entitlements are required for the Proposed Project. Impacts would be less than significant.
c) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments?
Less than Significant Impact . The City’s existing WWTP will have adequate capacity to serve the Proposed Project because the proposed activities are not introducing additional water demand in the area. The Proposed Project intends to increase the City’s water storage to address existing demands of the public. As previously discussed, there are no proposed personnel increases or need for irrigation that would increase the need for wastewater treatment facilities. Impacts would be less than significant.
d) Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? Less Than Significant Impact. The City’s Sustainable Community Element identifies waste reduction and recycling goals within the City. Waste reduction goals include the reduction of generation of solid waste. These would meet the State’s policy goal that not less than 75 percent of solid waste generated be source-reduced, recycled, or composted.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
289 of 932
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
City of Redlands, CA
Chambers Group, Inc. 60
21532
The Proposed Project will be operating a new recycled water reservoir water tank to be serviced by the existing employees maintaining the existing water facility tank adjacent to the Project site. The Project site would not result in a significant increase in employees that would create an increase of solid wastes generated.

Construction of the Proposed Project would result in generation of construction wastes. The construction activities will comply with the City’s requirements for Construction and Demolition Recycling Requirements (Section 13.66.040 of the Municipal Code) wh ich outlines the requirements for loading and collection areas, targeted materials for recycling, separation of materials, and compliance with the General Plan. There is no increase in long-term waste generation given that the Project site is not introducing new populations and will be serviced by existing employees of the City.

Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in the generation of solid wastes in excess of state or local standards and would not result in impairing solid waste reduction goals. Impacts , therefore, would be less than significant.
e) Would the project c omply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste?
Less than Significant Impact . As discussed above, the generation of solid waste would be limited during construction and will comply with the Federal, State, and local requirements , including the City’s Construction and Demolition Requirements for managing solid waste, CalGreen Code, and the Chapter 13.64 Integrated Solid Waste Management ordinance. Impacts would be less than significant.

4.20 WILDFIRE

20. WILDFIRE.

If located in or near state responsibility areas or
lands classified as very high fire hazard severity
zones, would the project:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Substantially impair an adopted emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan?
(b) Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors,
exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project
occupants to pollutant concentrations from a
wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?

(c) Require the installation or maintenance of
associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks,
emergency water sources, power lines or other
utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may
result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the
environment?

(d) Expose people or structures to significant risks,
including downslope or downstream flooding or
landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope
instability, or drainage changes?

4.20.1 Impact Analysis
a) Would the project impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Less than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project would not interfere with an evacuation or emergency plan as discussed in Section 4.9 Hazards and Hazardous Materials. In addition, CALFIRE has Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
290 of 932
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
City of Redlands, CA
Chambers Group, Inc. 61
21532
prepared Fire Hazard Severity Zone Maps for the State, and the Project site is in a Non-Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (CALFIRE 2023). The nearest Ver y High Fire Hazard Severity Zone is located approximately 3 miles south from the Project site in an open space area adjacent to the San Timoteo Wash (CALFIRE 2023). While the Project site is not located within a fire hazard zone, the open spaces to the north of the Project site could create an environment where wildland fires could occur especially during dry and high wind seasons. The Proposed Project will conform to City guidelines and regulations for new development to minimize fire hazard as outlined in the General Plan (Fire Hazards Policies) (City 2017). These requirements include but are not limited to, using appropriate building material and design features, siting and designing development to avoid hazardous locations, incorporate fuel modification and brush clearances, and coordination with the Redlands Fire Department and other fire prevention ag encies to review all applications for development.

Conformance with these guidelines would result in less than significant impacts. b) Would the project, due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire?
Less than Significant Impact. As discussed above, the Proposed Project site is not located within, nor adjacent to, a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone of state or local responsibility (CALFIRE 2023). In addition, the Project site is in a flat, developed area with no slopes that would exacerbate fire risks.

While the Project site is not located within a fire hazard zone, the open spaces to the north of the Project Site could create an environment where wildland fires could occur especially during dry and high wind seasons. The Proposed Project will conform to City guidelines and regulations for new development to minimize fire hazard as outlined in the General Plan (Fire Hazards Principles and Actions). These requirements include, but are not limited to, using appropriate building material and design features, siting and designing development to avoid hazardous locations, incorporating fuel modification and brush clearances, and coordination with the Redlands Fire Department and other fire prevention agencies to review all applications for development. Conforma nce with these guidelines would result in less than significant impacts. c) Would the project require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines, or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? No Impact. As noted in Section a) and b), the Proposed Project is not located in an area deemed at a risk of wildfire. However, open spaces could create an environment where wildland fires could occur.

The existing and proposed water infrastructure tanks at the WWTP would serve as emergency water sources, thus installation of additional infrastructure that would exacerbate fire risks would not be necessary under the Proposed Project. No impact would occur. d) Would the project expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability or drainage changes? Less than Significant Impact. The Proposed Project site is not in an area prone to wildfire or near any water bodies that could cause slope instability or drainage changes. However, as discussed in Section a) and b), the open space north of the Project site could create an environment where wildfires could occur especially during dry and high wind seasons. The Proposed Project shall comply with City guidelines and regulations for new developments to minimize fire hazards (General Plan, Fire Hazards Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
291 of 932
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
City of Redlands, CA
Chambers Group, Inc. 62
21532
Principles and Actions). Conformance with these guidelines would result in a less than significant impact.

4.21 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE

21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
(a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, substantially reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or prehistory?

(b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable?
(“Cumulatively considerable” means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effec ts of other current projects, and
the effects of probable future projects?)

(c) Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?

4.21.1 Impact Analysis
a) Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Less than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated. As discussed in Section 4.4, the Proposed Project does not have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment or adversely impact sensitive biological resources. The Project site is a disturbed, vacant lot with minimal vegetation, and no suitable habitat is present. It has been previously used as a worksite for the WWTP, with aerial imagery confirming signs of disturbance such as tire marks, grading, and a flat surface.

While the Riversidean Alluvial Fan Sage Scrub habitat - which supports special -status species like Slender-horned spineflower, Santa Ana River woollystar, and California gnatcatcher - is located between the Santa Ana River and the Project site, the Project itself does not directly impact this habitat. Additionally, an existing water facility reservoir provides a buffer between the Project site and the sensitive habitat, eliminating the need for additional protective measures.

The Project will not impact riparian habitat, wetlands, or wildlife corridors. It is located 0.20 miles from the Santa Ana River, a state -protected wetland, but no direct encroachment, hydrological alteration, or pollutant discharge is anticipated. BMPs wi ll be implemented during construction to Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
292 of 932
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
City of Redlands, CA
Chambers Group, Inc. 63
21532
prevent sediment transport and water quality degradation, ensuring compliance with local and state water quality regulations.

The Project site is outside of any designated critical habitats and does not conflict with any local, regional, or state conservation plans. Additionally, no tree removal is required, and the Project aligns with the City’s General Plan policies on habitat conservation and biological resource protection.

As discussed in Section 4.7, the Project site contains soils that are considered highly paleontologically sensitive. Regarding historical resources, as discussed in Section 4.5, the CHRIS data system search results indicated the Project site does not contain important examples of major periods in California’s history, thus no mitigation measures for this issue are necessary. Regarding archeological resources, the analysis in Section 4.5 determined that the Project site is in an archeologically sensitive area, thus there is a likelihood of discovery of an archeological resource during grading and excavation of the Project site.

Based on Tribal Consultation discussed in Section 4.18, mitigation measures have been incorporated to address potential impacts to tribal cultural resources.

Thus, implementation of mitigation measures MM PAL-1, MM PAL-2, CUL-1, CUL-2, CUL-3, CUL-4, and TCR-1 through TCR-8 would reduce impacts to less than significant. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effec ts of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects?)
Less than Significant Impacts . Impacts associated with the Proposed Project would generally be associated with short-term construction activities as operations of the new water reservoir would be passive and not require an increase in staff. According to the City’s Planning Division Major Project List 2025, updated in September 2023, the only listed project near the Proposed Project is the Marriott Springhill Suites located on Lugonia Ave. between Nevada St. and Alabama St (City 2025b). However, this project has already been completed, thus there will be no cumulatively considerable impacts associated with construction.

Besides the Marriot Springhill Suites project, t here are no listed projects that are occurring on or adjacent to the Project site on Nevada Street, Palmetto Avenue, Pioneer Avenue, San Bernardino Avenue, Alabama Street, or California Street . Cumulative impacts would be considered less than significant.
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Less than Significant Impact . Substantial adverse effects on human beings directly or indirectly are primarily resulting from impacts on air quality, geology and soil s, greenhouse gas emissions, hazardous materials, land use, noise, and wildfire. Out of these impact categories, there is one impact associated with geology and soils that would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated (MM PAL-1 and MM PAL-2), due to the Project site’s high paleontological sensitivity (see Section 4.7).

In addition, impacts regarding paleontological resources do not result in substantial adverse effects on human beings. As analyzed in this document, all other impacts relating to substantial adverse effects on human beings have been determined to be less than significant as the Proposed Project’s Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
293 of 932
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
City of Redlands, CA
Chambers Group, Inc. 64
21532
construction and operations will comply with the City’s General Plan policies and Municipal Code.

Impacts will be less than significant with mitigation incorporated.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
294 of 932
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
City of Redlands, CA
Chambers Group, Inc. 65
21532
SECTION 5.0 – REFERENCES
California Department of Conservation (DOC)
1995 Mineral Land Classification of a Part of Southwestern San Bernadino County: The San Bernadino Valley Area, California (East).
2022 California Important Farmland Finder. Available online at:
https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/

California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CALFIRE) 2023 San Bernadino County State Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones. Available at:
https://34c031f8-c9fd-4018-8c5a-4159cdff6b0d-cdn-endpoint.azureedge.net/- /media/osfm-website/what-we-do/community-wildfire-preparedness-and- mitigation/fire-hazard-severity-zones/fire-hazard-severity-zones-map-2022/fire-hazard- severity-zones-maps-2022-
files/fhsz_county_sra_11x17_2022_sanbernardino_3.pdf?rev=208ee27d5010412185a0 ae9d6767251b&hash=71286B8B3138D0FE369A4B7AE763C183
California Department of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources (CalGEM) 2025 Well Finder. Available at: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doggr/wellfinder/ California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
2023 State Scenic Highway System Map. Available at:
https://caltrans.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=465dfd3d807c46c c8e8057116f1aacaa
California Department of Water Resources (DWR)
2025 Groundwater Level Report Station 340886N1172175W001. Available at:
https://wdl.water.ca.gov/WaterDataLibrary/GroundwaterBrowseData.aspx?LocalWellN umber=&StationId=25824&StateWellNumber=01S03W17C005S&SelectedCounties=&Sit eCode=340886N1172175W001&SelectedGWBasins=
California State Legislature (California)
2014 Senate Bill No. 1390. Available at:
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201320140SB1390 California Water Boards (CWB)
2008 Water Quality Control Plan Santa Ana River Basin. Available at:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/water_issues/programs/basin_plan/#:~:text =The%20Basin%20Plan%20establishes%20water,maintain%20the%20water%20quality% 20standards.

City of Redlands (City)
2017 General Plan 2035. https://www.cityofredlands.org/post/planning-division-general-plan 2022 Zoning Map. Available at: https://www.cityofredlands.org/sites/main/files/file- attachments/zoning.pdf?1670528707
2025a Water System. Water System - City of Redlands
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
295 of 932
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
City of Redlands, CA
Chambers Group, Inc. 66
21532
2025b City of Redlands Planning Division Major Projects List 2025. Available at:
https://www.cityofredlands.org/sites/main/files/file-
attachments/major_projects_list_1q_2025_-_1.09.2025.pdf County of San Bernardino (County)
2007a General Plan Open Space Element. Available at:
http://www.sbcounty.gov/Uploads/lus/GeneralPlan/OpenSpaceCountywide.pdf 2007b 2006 General Plan Program. Final Environmental Impact Report and Appendices.

Available at: https://lus.sbcounty.gov/wp-
content/uploads/sites/48/GeneralPlan/FinalEIR2007.pdf
2020 General Plan Geologic Hazard Overlays. Available at: FH31C-20100309.pdf Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC)
2025a RCRA Large Quantity Generators of Hazardous Waste . Available at:
https://dtsc.ca.gov/large-quantity-generator-of-hazardous-waste-definition/ 2025b Envirostor Database. Available at: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
2024 FEMA’s National Flood Hazard Layer Viewer. Available at: https://hazards- fema.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=8b0adb51996444d4879338 b5529aa9cd
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)
2006 Construction Noise Handbook.

Federal Transit Administration (FTA)
2018 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual.

Google
2025 Google Earth Pro. Available at: https://earth.google.com/web/.

Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA)
2023 Web Soil Survey. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from https://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB)
2010 NPDES Permit and WDR for San Bernardino County Flood Control District. Available at:
https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/santaana/board_decisions/adopted_orders/orders/2 010/10_036_sbc_ms4_permit_01_29_10.pdf
San Bernadino Valley Water Conservation District (SBVWCD) 2020 Upper Santa Ana River Integrated Regional Water Management Plan. Available at:
https://www.cityofredlands.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/part_1- _regional_context.pdf?1622162746
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
296 of 932
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
City of Redlands, CA
Chambers Group, Inc. 67
21532
2025 Engineering Investigation of the Bunker Hill Basin. Available at:
https://www.sbvwcd.org/reports-and-data/engineering-investigation/final-2025- engineering-investigation-report/?layout=file
State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB)
2025 GeoTracker Database. Available at: https://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service & San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District (USFW) 2019 Final Environmental Impact Statement/Supplemental Environmental Impact Report:

Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan and Section 10 Permit for the Upper Santa Ana River Wash Plan. Available at:
https://www.sbvwcd.org/~documents/route%3A/download/6227/ Vista Environmental
2023 Noise Impact Analysis. Available at:
https://www.cityofredlands.org/sites/main/files/file-
attachments/appendix_h_noise_study.pdf
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
297 of 932

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
298 of 932

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project

CITY OF REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA
Prepared for:

CITY OF REDLANDS
Municipal Utilities and Engineering Department
35 Cajon Street, Suite 15A
Redlands, CA 92373
Prepared by:

CHAMBERS GROUP, INC.
3151 Airway Avenue, Suite F208
Costa Mesa, California 92626
(949) 261-5414
October 2025
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
299 of 932
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
Chambers Group, Inc. 2
21532

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
Public Resources Code, Section 21081.6 (Assembly Bill 3180) requires that mitigation measures identified in environmental review documents prepared in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are implemented after a project is approved. Therefore, this Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) has been prepared to ensure compliance with the adopted mitigation measures during the demolition and construction phases of the WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project (Proposed Project).

The City of Redlands is the agency responsible for implementation of the mitigation measures identified in the MND. This MMRP provides the City of Redlands with a convenient mechanism for quickly reviewing all the mitigation measures including the ability to focus on select information such as timing. The MMRP includes the following information for each mitigation measure:
▪ The phase of the project during which the required mitigation measure must be implemented; ▪ The phase of the project during which the required mitigation measure must be monitored; and ▪ The enforcement agency.

The MMRP includes a checklist to be used during the mitigation monitoring period. The checklist will verify the name of the monitor, the date of the monitoring activity, and any related remarks for each mitigation measure.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
300 of 932

Chambers Group, Inc. 3
21532

MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
WWTP Recycled Water Reservoir CEQA Project
Mitigation Measure Implementation Phase Monitoring
Phase
Enforcement
Agency
Level of Significance
After Mitigation
Less than Significant (LTS)
Verification of Compliance
Initial Date Remarks
Cultural Resources
CUL-1: The City shall retain the services of a Qualified Archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior Standards, or County requirements, whichever is the greater. The Qualified Archaeologist shall remain on -call throughout the Project. Upon approval or re quest by the City, a cultural resources mitigation plan (CRMP) outlining procedures for cultural resources monitoring, mitigation, treatment, and data recovery of any unanticipated discovery shall be prepared for the Project and submitted to the City for review and approval. The development and implementation of the CRMP shall include consultations with the City, as well as a requirement that the curation of any significant cultural resources recovered under any scenario shall be through an appropriate repository agreed upon by the City. If the City accepts ownership, the curation location may be revised.

If significant pre -contact cultural resources, as defined by CEQA, are discovered and avoidance cannot be ensured, the drafts of the CRMP shall be provided to YSMN for review and comment. The archaeologist shall monitor the remainder of the Project and implement the CRMP accordingly.

Pre-Construction Construction City of Redlands LTS
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
301 of 932

Chambers Group, Inc. 4
21532

Except in the case of cultural items that fall within the scope of the California Health and Safety Code 7050.5, CEQA Section 15064.5, or California PRC Section 5097.98, the discovery of any cultural resource within the Project site shall not be grounds for a project-wide “stop work” notice or otherwise interfere with the Project’s continuation except as outlined in this mitigation measure.

In the event of an unanticipated discovery of cultural resources during construction, the City -retained Qualified Archaeologist, who must meet the Secretary of the Interior standards, shall be contacted to evaluate the significance of the materials prior to resuming any construction -related activities in the vicinity of the find. If a CRMP is prepared for the Project, the protocols for the mitigation or treatment of cultural resources will be implemented. If the Qualified Archaeologist determines that the discovery constitutes a significant resource under CEQA and it cannot be avoided, the City shall implement an archaeological data recovery program.

Additionally, any consulting Native American Tribal groups that requested notification of any unanticipated discovery of cultural resources on the Project shall be notified and included in subsequent consultation appropriately. Specifically, the YSMN shall be contacted regarding any pre- contact finds and provided information after the archaeologist makes his/her initial assessment of the nature of the find, to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment.

Construction Construction City of Redlands LTS
CUL-3: If cultural resources are encountered during the Project, the Qualified Archaeologist shall prepare a report summarizing any and all prehistoric or historic archaeological finds as well as providing follow -up reports of any finds to the SCCIC, as required.

Post-Construction Construction City of Redlands LTS
CUL-4: If human remains or funerary objects are encountered during any activities associated with the project, work in the immediate vicinity (within a 100-foot buffer of the find) shall cease and the County Coroner shall be contacted pursuant to State Health and Safety Code §7050.5 and that code enforced for the duration of the project.

Construction Construction

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
302 of 932

Chambers Group, Inc. 5
21532
Mitigation Measure Implementation Phase Monitoring
Phase
Enforcement
Agency
Level of Significance
After Mitigation
Verification of Compliance
Initial Date Remarks
Geology and Soils
PAL-1: Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the City shall be required to obtain the services of a Qualified Project Paleontologist to remain on call for the duration of the proposed ground disturbing construction activity.

The paleontologist selected must be approved by the City. Upon approval or request by the City, a paleontological mitigation plan (PMP) outlining procedures for paleontological data recovery shall be prepared for the Project and submitted to the City for review and approval. The development and implementation of the PMP shall include consultations with the District’s Engineering Geologist, as well as a requirement that the curation of all specimens recovered under any scenario shall be through an appropriate repository agreed upon by the City. If the District accepts ownership, the curation location may be revised. The PMP shall include developing a multilevel ranking system, or Potential Fossil Yield Classification (PFYC), as a tool to demonstrate the potential yield of fossils within a given stratigraphic unit. The PMP shall outline the monitoring and salvage protocols to address paleontological resources encountered during Project -related ground -disturbing activities, as well as the appropriate recording, collection, and processing protocols to appropriately address any resources discovered.

Pre-Construction/Construction Construction City of Redlands LTS PAL-2: At the completion of all ground -disturbing activities, the Project Paleontologist shall prepare a final paleontological mitigation report summarizing all monitoring efforts and observations, as performed in line with the PMP, and all paleontological resour ces encountered, if any, as well as providing follow-up reports of any specific discovery, if necessary.

Post-Construction Construction City of Redlands LTS
Tribal Cultural Resources
TCR-1: The Yuhaaviatam of San Manuel Nation Cultural Resources Management Department (YSMN) shall be contacted, as detailed in CUL- 1, of any pre -contact cultural resources discovered during project implementation, and be provided information regarding the nature of the find, so as to provide Tribal input with regards to significance and treatment. Should the find be deemed significant, as defined by CEQA (as amended, 2015), a Cultural Resources Monitoring and Treatment Plan shall be created by the archaeologist, in coordination with YSMN, and all subsequent finds shall be subject to this Plan. This Plan shall allow for a monitor to be present that represents YSMN for the remainder of the project, should YSMN elect to place a monitor on-site.

Pre-Construction/Construction Construction City of Redlands LTS

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
303 of 932

Chambers Group, Inc. 6
21532
Mitigation Measure Implementation Phase Monitoring
Phase
Enforcement
Agency
Level of Significance
After Mitigation
Less than Significant (LTS)
Verification of Compliance
Initial Date Remarks
TCR-2: Any and all archaeological/cultural documents created as a part of the Project (isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be supplied to the applicant and Lead Agency for dissemination to YSMN. The Lead Agency and/or appli cant shall, in good faith, consult with YSMN throughout the life of the Project.

Pre-Construction/Construction Construction City of Redlands LTS TCR-3: Native American Treatment Agreement . Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the applicant shall enter into a Tribal Monitoring Agreement with the Morongo Band of Mission Indians for the Project. The Tribal Monitor(s) shall be on -site during all ground -disturbing activities (including, but not limited to, clearing, grubbing, tree and bush removal, grading, trenching, fence post placement and removal, construction excavation, excavation for all utility and irrigation lines, and landscaping phases of any kind). The Tribal Monitor(s) shall ha ve the authority to temporarily divert, redirect, or halt the ground -disturbing activities to allow identification, evaluation, and potential recovery of cultural resources and/or tribal cultural resources.

Pre-Construction Construction City of Redlands LTS
TCR-4: Cultural Resource Management Plan. Prior to any ground - disturbing activities the project archaeologist shall develop a Cultural Resource Management Plan (CRMP) and/or Archaeological Monitoring and Treatment Plan (AMTP) to address the details, timing, and responsibilities of all archaeologi cal and cultural resource activities that occur on the project site. This Plan shall be written in consultation with the Consulting Tribe[s] and at minimum, shall include the following: (1) the approved Mitigation Measures (MM)/Conditions of Approval (COA) , (2) procedures for each MM/COA, (3) the contact information for all pertinent parties, (4) parties’ responsibilities, and (5) an overview of the project schedule.

Pre-Construction Pre-Construction City of Redlands LTS
TCR-5: Pre-Grade Meeting . The retained qualified archeologist and Consulting Tribe[s] representative shall attend the pre-grade meeting with the grading contractors to explain and coordinate the requirements of the monitoring plan.

Pre-Construction Construction City of Redlands LTS

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
304 of 932

Chambers Group, Inc. 7
21532
Mitigation Measure Implementation Phase Monitoring
Phase
Enforcement
Agency
Level of Significance
After Mitigation
Less than Significant (LTS)
Verification of Compliance
Initial Date Remarks
TCR-6: Inadvertent Discovery of Cultural Resources . In the event that previously unidentified cultural resources are discovered /unearthed during construction, the qualified archaeologist and the Tribal Monitor(s) shall have the authority to temporarily divert and/or temporarily halt ground-disturbance ac tivities in the area of discovery to allow for the evaluation of potentially significant cultural resources. Isolates and clearly non-significant deposits shall be minimally documented in the field and collected so the monitored ground-disturbing activity can proceed.

If a potentially significant cultural resource(s) is discovered, work shall stop within a 60 -foot perimeter of the discovery and an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) physical demarcation/barrier constructed. All work shall be diverted away from the vici nity of the find(s), so that it/they can be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal Monitor[s]. The archaeologist shall notify the Lead Agency and Consulting Tribe[s] of said discovery. The qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the Lead Agency, the Consulting Tribe[s], and the Tribal monitor, shall determine the significance of the discovered resource. A recommendation for the treatment and disposition of the Tribal Cultural Resource shall be made by the qualified archaeologist in consultation with the Tribe[s] and the Tribal monitor[s] and be submitted to the Lead Agency for review and approval.

Below are the possible treatments and dispositions of significant cultural resources in order of CEQA preference:

A. Full avoidance.

B. If avoidance is not feasible, Preservation in place.

If Preservation in place is not feasible, all items shall be reburied in an area away from any future impacts and reside in a permanent conservation easement or Deed Restriction.

C. If all other options are proven to be infeasible, data recovery through excavation and then curation in a Curation Facility that meets the Federal Curation Standards (36 CFR 79).

Unless otherwise agreed upon by all parties, all removed items from the Project shall be temporarily curated on-site in a secure and locked location (i.e., Conex box, a lockable office or drawer with restricted access to it, etc.). A periodic inventory must be maintained and provided to Consulting Tribe[s].

Construction Construction City of Redlands LTS

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
305 of 932

Chambers Group, Inc. 8
21532
Mitigation Measure Implementation Phase Monitoring
Phase
Enforcement
Agency
Level of Significance
After Mitigation
Less than Significant (LTS)
Verification of Compliance
Initial Date Remarks
TCR-7: Inadvertent Discovery of Human Remains . The Morongo Band of Mission Indians requests the following specific conditions to be imposed in order to protect Native American human remains and/or cremations. No photographs are to be taken except by the coroner, with written approval by the Consulting Tribe[s].

A. Should human remains and/or cremations be encountered on the surface or during any and all ground -disturbing activities (i.e., clearing, grubbing, tree and bush removal, grading, trenching, fence post placement and removal, construction excavation, exca vation for all water supply, electrical, and irrigation lines, and landscaping phases of any kind), work in the immediate vicinity of the discovery shall immediately stop within a 100- foot perimeter of the discovery. The area shall be protected by the establishment of an ESA with a marked boundary. Project personnel/observers will be restricted from entry into the ESA. The County Coroner is to be contacted within 24 hours of discovery. The County Coroner has 48 hours to make his/her determination pursuant to State and Safety Code §7050.5. and Public Resources Code (PRC) § 5097.98.

C. The NAHC shall immediately notify the person or persons it believes to be the Most Likely Descendant (MLD). The MLD has 48 hours, upon being granted access to the Project site, to inspect the site of discovery and make his/her recommendation for final t reatment and disposition, with appropriate dignity, of the remains and all associated grave goods pursuant to PRC §5097.98

D. If the Morongo Band of Mission Indians has been named the MLD or Co- MLD, the Tribe may wish to rebury the human remains and/or cremation and sacred items in their place of discovery with no further disturbance where they will reside in perpetuity. The place(s) of reburial will not be disclosed by any party and is exempt from the California Public Records Act (California Government Code § 6254[r]). Reburial location of human remains and/or cremations will be determined by the Tribe’s MLD, the landowner, and the City Planning Department
Construction Construction City of Redlands LTS
TCR-8: FINAL REPORT: The final report[s] created as a part of the project (CRMP/AMTP, isolate records, site records, survey reports, testing reports, etc.) shall be submitted to the Lead Agency and Consulting Tribe[s] for review and comment. After approval of all parties, the final reports are to be submitted to the appropriate Information Center (IC), and the Consulting Tribe[s]
Post-Construction Construction City of Redlands LTS
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
306 of 932
City Council Meeting I. 6.

DATE: 11/18/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve First Amendment to the Agreement with Coffman Associates, Inc. extending the agreement term for the Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan at Redlands Municipal Airport (Facilities and Community Services Director Crocker)
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Coffman Associates, Inc. to extend the term of the agreement to August 30, 2026.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Agreement with Coffman Associates, Inc. to extend the term of the existing professional services agreement for the Wildlife Hazard Assessment and Wildlife Hazard Management Plan at the Redlands Municipal Airport.

DISCUSSION:

On January 17, 2023, the City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement and Single Source Purchase Order with Coffman Associates, Inc. in the amount of $98,650 to conduct a Wildlife Hazard Assessment and prepare a Wildlife Hazard Management Plan for the Redlands Municipal Airport. The project is funded through a grant from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and is essential to ensuring safe airport operations by addressing the growing presence of wildlife near the airfield. Coffman Associates possesses extensive knowledge of Redlands Municipal Airport operations and previously developed the City’s Airport Land Use Plan, making them uniquely qualified for this work.

The Wildlife Hazard Assessment portion of the project has now been completed Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
307 of 932
in coordination with airport staff and FAA representatives. The next phase involves the development of the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan, which will outline strategies, policies, and procedures to mitigate identified risks and maintain compliance with FAA safety standards. The proposed First Amendment seeks to extend the term of the agreement to August 30, 2026, providing sufficient time to finalize the management plan, conduct additional stakeholder coordination, and secure FAA approval. This revised timeline also aligns the completion of the consultant’s work with the term of the FAA grant, ensuring all project activities and reimbursements remain eligible and in full compliance with federal funding requirements. Furthermore, this amendment does not add any cost to the agreement and serves solely to extend the project duration to complete the remaining deliverables consistent with the FAA grant schedule and reporting deadlines.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may choose not to approve the First Amendment and provide staff with alternative direction.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Not applicable.

SUBMITTED BY:

Tabitha Crocker, Facilities and Community Services Department Director RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Christopher Boatman, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Salomon Abdel-Aziz, Management Analyst
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2025/26
Revenue Generating: N
Appropriation Required Y/N: N
Amount: $0.00
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
308 of 932
Budgeted Y/N: N/A
Account No.: N/A
Discussion:

No additional cost associated with this amendment.

Attachments

1. Original Grant Agreement

2. Original Agreement

3. First Amendment
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
309 of 932

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
Airports Division
Western-Pacific Region
California
Los Angeles Airports District
Office:
777 S Aviation Blvd, Ste 150
El Segundo, CA 90245
{{DateTime_es_:signer1:calc(now()):format(date," mmmm d, yyyy")}} Honorable Mr. Barich
City of Redlands
35 Cajon Street
Suite 222
Redlands, CA 92373
Dear Mr. Barich:

The Grant Offer for Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Project No. 3-06-0195-021-2022 at Redlands Municipal Airport is attached for execution. This letter outlines the steps you must take to properly enter into this agreement and provides other useful information. Please read the conditions, special conditions, and assurances that comprise the grant offer carefully.

You may not make any modification to the text, terms or conditions of the grant offer.

Steps You Must Take to Enter Into Agreement.

To properly enter into this agreement, you must do the following:

1. The governing body must give authority to execute the grant to the individual(s) signing the grant, i.e., the person signing the document must be the sponsor’s authorized representative(s) (hereinafter “authorized representative”).

2. The authorized representative must execute the grant by adding their electronic signature to the appropriate certificate at the end of the agreement.

3. Once the authorized representative has electronically signed the grant, the sponsor‘s attorney(s) will automatically receive an email notification.

4. On
the same day or after the authorized representative has signed the grant, the sponsor‘s attorney(s) will add their electronic signature to the appropriate certificate at the end of the agreement.

5. If there are co-
sponsors, the authorized representative(s) and sponsor‘s attorney(s) must follow the above procedures to fully execute the grant and finalize the process. Signatures must be obtained and finalized no later than August 31, 2022.

6. T he fully executed grant will then be automatically sent to all parties as an email attachment.

Payment. Subject to the requirements in 2 CFR § 200.305 (Federal Payment), each payment request for reimbursement under this grant must be made electronically via the Delphi eInvoicing System. Please see the attached Grant Agreement for more information regarding the use of this System.

Project Timing. The terms and conditions of this agreement require you to complete the project without undue delay and no later than the Period of Performance end date (1,460 days from the grant execution July 26, 2022
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
310 of 932
date). We will be monitoring your progress to ensure proper stewardship of these Federal funds. We expect you to submit payment requests for reimbursement of allowable incurred project expenses consistent with project progress. Your grant may be placed in “inactive” status if you do not make draws on a regular basis, which will affect your ability to receive future grant offers. Costs incurred after the Period of Performance ends are generally not allowable and will be rejected unless authorized by the FAA in advance.

Reporting. U
ntil the grant is completed and closed, you are responsible for submitting formal reports as follows:
• For all grants, you must submit by December 31st of each year this grant is open:

1. A signed/dated SF-270 (Request for Advance or Reimbursement for non-construction projects) or SF-271 or equivalent (Outlay Report and Request for Reimbursement for Construction Programs), and

2. An SF-425 (Federal Financial Report).
• For non-construction projects, you must submit FAA Form 5100-140, Performance Report within 30 days of the end of the Federal fiscal year.
• For construction projects, you must submit FAA Form 5370-1, Construction Progress and Inspection Report, within 30 days of the end of each Federal fiscal quarter.

Audit Requirements. As a condition of receiving Federal assistance under this award, you must comply with audit requirements as established under 2 CFR part 200. Subpart F requires non-Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in Federal awards to conduct a single or program specific audit for that year. Note that this includes Federal expenditures made under other Federal-assistance programs.

Please take appropriate and necessary action to ensure your organization will comply with applicable audit requirements and standards.

Closeout. On
ce the project(s) is completed and all costs are determined, we ask that you work with your FAA contact indicated below to close the project without delay and submit the necessary final closeout documentation as required by your Region/Airports District Office.

FAA Contact Information. Gail Campos, (424) 405-7269, [email protected] is the assigned program manager for this grant and is readily available to assist you and your designated representative with the requirements stated herein.

We sincerely value your cooperation in these efforts and look forward to working with you to complete th
is important project.

Sincerely,
{{Sig_es_:signer1: signature}}
Cathryn Cason
Manager
[ADO has discretion to delegate signature authority to Program Manager] Cathryn G. Cason (Jul 26, 2022 09:48 PDT)
Cathryn G. Cason
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
311 of 932

U.S. Department
of Transportation
Federal Aviation
Administration
FAA Airport Improvement Program (AIP)

GRANT AGREEMENT
Part I - Offer

Federal Award Offer Date {{DateTime_es_:signer1:calc(now()):format(date," mmmm d, yyyy")}}

Airport/Planning Area Redlands Municipal Airport

FY2022 AIP Grant Number 3-06-0195-021-2022

Unique Entity Identifier VCE6UFMK6PL5

TO: City of Redlands
(herein called the "Sponsor")

FROM: The United States of America (acting through the Federal Aviation Administration, herein called the "FAA")

WHEREAS, the Sponsor has submitted to the FAA a Project Application dated July 15, 2022, for a grant of Federal funds for a project at or associated with the Redlands Municipal Airport, which is included as part of this Grant Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the FAA has approved a project for the Redlands Municipal Airport (herein called the “Project”) consisting of the following:

Airport Wildlife Hazard Assessment/Management Plan
which is more fully described in the Project Application.

N
OW THEREFORE, Pursuant to and for the purpose of carrying out the Title 49, United States Code (U.S.C.), Chapters 471 and 475; 49 U.S.C. §§ 40101 et seq., and 48103; FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (Public Law Number 115-254); the Department of Transportation Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116-260, Division L); the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (Public Law 117-103); and the representations contained in the Project Application; and in consideration of: (a) the Sponsor’s adoption and ratification of the Grant Assurances attached hereto; (b) the Sponsor’s acceptance of this Offer; and (c) the benefits to accrue to the United States and the public from the accomplishment of the Project and compliance with the Grant Assurance and conditions as herein provided; July 26, 2022
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
312 of 932

THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES, HEREBY OFFERS AND AGREES to pay ninety (90) percent of the allowable costs incurred accomplishing the Project as the United States share of the Project.

Assistance Listings Number (Formerly CFDA Number): 20.106 This Offer is made on and SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS:

CONDITIONS

1. Maximum Obligation. The maximum obligation of the United States payable under this Offer is $98,650.

The following amounts represent a breakdown of the maximum obligation for the purpose of es
tablishing allowable amounts for any future grant amendment, which may increase the foregoing maximum obligation of the United States under the provisions of 49 U.S.C. § 47108(b):
$ 98,650 for planning
$ 0 airport development or noise program implementation; and, $ 0 for land acquisition.

2. Grant Performance. Thi s Grant Agreement is subject to the following Federal award requirements:
a. Period of Performance:

1. Shall start on the date the Sponsor formally accepts this Agreement and is the date signed by the last Sponsor signatory to the Agreement. The end date of the Period of Performance is 4 years (1,460 calendar days) from the date of acceptance. The Period of Performance end date shall not affect, relieve, or reduce Sponsor obligations and assurances that extend beyond the closeout of this Grant Agreement.

2. Means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date, which may include one or more funded portions or budget periods. (2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 200.1).
b. Budget Period:

1. For this Grant is 4 years (1,460 calendar days) and follows the same start and end date as the period of performance provided in paragraph (2)(a)(1). Pursuant to 2 CFR § 200.403(h), the Sponsor may charge to the Grant only allowable costs incurred during the Budget Period.

2. Means the time interval from the start date of a funded portion of an award to the end date of that funded portion during which the Sponsor is authorized to expend the funds awarded, including any funds carried forward or other revisions pursuant to 2 CFR § 200.308.
c. Close Out and Termination

1. Unless the FAA authorizes a written extension, the Sponsor must submit all Grant closeout documentation and liquidate (pay-off) all obligations incurred under this award no later than 120 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance. If the Sponsor does not submit all required closeout documentation within this time period, the FAA will proceed to close out the grant within one year of the period of performance end date with the information available at the end of 120 days. (2 CFR § 200.344).

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
313 of 932

2. The FAA may terminate this Grant, in whole or in part, in accordance with the conditions set forth in 2 CFR § 200.340, or other Federal regulatory or statutory authorities as applicable.

3. I
neligible or Unallowable Costs. The Sponsor must not include any costs in the project that the FAA has determined to be ineligible or unallowable.

4. Indirect Costs - S ponsor. The Sponsor may charge indirect costs under this award by applying the indirect cost rate identified in the project application as accepted by the FAA, to allowable costs for Sponsor direct salaries and wages.

5. Determining the Final Federal Share of Costs. T
he United States’ share of allowable project costs
will be made in accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 47109, the regulations, policies, and procedures of the Secretary of Transportation (“Secretary”), and any superseding legislation. Final determination of the United States’ share will be based upon the final audit of the total amount of allowable project costs and settlement will be made for any upward or downward adjustments to the Federal share of costs.

6. Completing t
he Project Without Delay and in Conformance with Requirements. The Sponsor must carry out and complete the project without undue delays and in accordance with this Agreement, 49 U.S.C. Chapters 471 and 475, and the regulations, and the Secretary’s policies and procedures.

Per 2 CFR § 200.308, the Sponsor agrees to report and request prior FAA approval for any disengagement from performing the project that exceeds three months or a 25 percent reduction in time devoted to the project. The report must include a reason for the project stoppage. The Sponsor also agrees to comply with the grant assurances, which are part of this Agreement.

7. Amendments or Withdrawals before Grant Acceptance. T he FAA reserves the right to amend or
withdraw this offer at any time prior to its acceptance by the Sponsor.

8. Offer Expiration Date. T his offer will expire and the United States will not be obligated to pay any part of the costs of the project unless this offer has been accepted by the Sponsor on or before August 31, 2022, or such subsequent date as may be prescribed in writing by the FAA.

9. Improper Use of Federal Funds. Th e Sponsor must take all steps, including litigation if necessary, to recover Federal funds spent fraudulently, wastefully, or in violation of Federal antitrust statutes, or misused in any other manner for any project upon which Federal funds have been expended. For the purposes of this Grant Agreement, the term “Federal funds” means funds however used or dispersed by the Sponsor, that were originally paid pursuant to this or any other Federal grant agreement. The Sponsor must obtain the approval of the Secretary as to any determination of the amount of the Federal share of such funds. The Sponsor must return the recovered Federal share, including funds recovered by settlement, order, or judgment, to the Secretary. The Sponsor must furnish to the Secretary, upon request, all documents and records pertaining to the determination of the amount of the Federal share or to any settlement, litigation, negotiation, or other efforts taken to recover such funds. All settlements or other final positions of the Sponsor, in court or otherwise, involving the recovery of such Federal share require advance approval by the Secretary.

10. United States Not Liable for Damage or Injury
. The United States is not responsible or liable for
damage to property or injury to persons which may arise from, or be incident to, compliance with this Grant Agreement.

11. System for Award Management (SAM) Registration and Unique Entity Identifier (UEI).

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
314 of 932
a. Requirement for System for Award Management (SAM): Unless the Sponsor is exempted from this requirement under 2 CFR § 25.110, the Sponsor must maintain the currency of its information in the SAM until the Sponsor submits the final financial report required under this Grant, or receives the final payment, whichever is later. This requires that the Sponsor review and update the information at least annually after the initial registration and more frequently if required by changes in information or another award term. Additional information about registration procedures may be found at the SAM website (currently at http://www.sam.gov). b. Unique entity identifier (UEI) means a 12-character alpha-numeric value used to identify a specific commercial, nonprofit or governmental entity. A UEI may be obtained from SAM.gov at https://sam.gov/content/entity-registration.

12. Electronic Grant Payment(s). Unless otherwise directed by the FAA, the Sponsor must make each payment request under this Agreement electronically via the Delphi eInvoicing System for Department of Transportation (DOT) Financial Assistance Awardees.

13. Informal Letter Amendment of AIP Projects. I
f, during the life of the project, the FAA determines
that the maximum grant obligation of the United States exceeds the expected needs of the Sponsor by $25,000 or five percent (5%), whichever is greater, the FAA can issue a letter amendment to the Sponsor unilaterally reducing the maximum obligation.

The FAA can also issue a letter to the Sponsor increasing the maximum obligation if there is an o
verrun in the total actual eligible and allowable project costs to cover the amount of the overrun provided it will not exceed the statutory limitations for grant amendments. The FAA’s authority to increase the maximum obligation does not apply to the “planning” component of Condition No. 1, Maximum Obligation.

The FAA can also issue an informal letter amendment that modifies the grant description to correct administrative errors or to delete work items if the FAA finds it advantageous and in the best interests of the United States.

An informal letter amendment has the same force and effect as a formal grant amendment.

14. A
ir and Water Quality . The Sponsor is required to comply with all applicable air and water quality standards for all projects in this grant. If the Sponsor fails to comply with this requirement, the FAA may suspend, cancel, or terminate this Grant Agreement.

15. Financial Reporting and Payment Requirements. T he Sponsor will comply with all Federal financial reporting requirements and payment requirements, including submittal of timely and accurate reports.

16. Buy American. U
nless otherwise approved in advance by the FAA, in accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 50101, the Sponsor will not acquire or permit any contractor or subcontractor to acquire any steel or manufactured products produced outside the United States to be used for any project for which funds are provided under this grant. The Sponsor will include a provision implementing Buy American in every contract and subcontract awarded under this Grant.

17. Build America, Buy America. The
sponsor must comply with the requirements under the Build America, Buy America Act (Public Law 117-58).

18. Maximum Obligation Increase. In accordance with 49 U.S.C. § 47108(b)(3), as amended, the maximum obligation of the United States, as stated in Condition No. 1, Maximum Obligation, of this Grant Offer:

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
315 of 932
a. May not be increased for a planning project;
b. May be increased by not more than 15 percent for development projects if funds are available; c. May be increased by not more than the greater of the following for a land project, if funds are available:

1. 15 percent; or

2. 25 percent of the total increase in allowable project costs attributable to acquiring an interest in the land.

If the sponsor requests an increase, any eligible increase in funding will be subject to the United States Government share as provided in 49 U.S.C. § 47110, or other superseding legislation if applicable, for the fiscal year appropriation with which the increase is funded. The FAA is not responsible for the same Federal share provided herein for any amount increased over the initial grant amount. The FAA may adjust the Federal share as applicable through an informal letter of amendment.

19. A
udits for Sponsors.

PUBLIC SPONSORS. The Sponsor must provide for a Single Audit or program-specific audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200. The Sponsor must submit the audit reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse on the Federal Audit Clearinghouse’s Internet Data Entry System at http://harvester.census.gov/facweb/. Upon request of the FAA, the Sponsor shall provide one copy of the completed audit to the FAA. Sponsors that expend less than $750,000 in Federal awards and are exempt from Federal audit requirements must make records available for review or audit by the appropriate Federal agency officials, State, and Government Accountability Office. The FAA and other appropriate Federal agencies may request additional information to meet all Federal audit requirements.

20. Suspension or Debarment. W
hen entering into a “covered transaction” as defined by 2 CFR § 180.200, the Sponsor must:
a. Ve rify the non -Federal entity is eligible to participate in this Federal program by:

1. Checking the excluded parties list system (EPLS) as maintained within the System for Award Management (SAM) to determine if the non-Federal entity is excluded or disqualified; or

2. Collecting a certification statement from the non-Federal entity attesting they are not excluded or disqualified from participating; or

3. Adding a clause or condition to covered transactions attesting the individual or firm are not excluded or disqualified from participating.
b. Require prime contractors to comply with 2 CFR § 180.330 when entering into lower-tier transactions (e.g., Sub-contracts).
c. Immediately disclose in writing to the FAA whenever (1) the Sponsor learns they have entered into a covered transaction with an ineligible entity or (2) the Public Sponsor suspends or debars a contractor, person, or entity.

21. B
an on Texting While Driving .

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
316 of 932
a. In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, October 1, 2009, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, December 30, 2009, the Sponsor is encouraged to:

1. Adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted drivers including policies to ban text messaging while driving when performing any work for, or on behalf of, the Federal government, including work relating to a grant or subgrant.

2. Conduct workplace safety initiatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as:
a. Establishment of new rules and programs or re-evaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving; and
b. Education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving.
b. The Sponsor must insert the substance of this clause on banning texting while driving in all subgrants, contracts, and subcontracts funded with this Grant.

22. T
rafficking in Persons.
a. You as the recipient, your employees, subrecipients under this Grant, and subrecipients’ employees may not:

1. Engage in severe forms of trafficking in persons during the period of time that the Grant and applicable conditions are in effect;

2. Procure a commercial sex act during the period of time that the Grant and applicable conditions are in effect; or

3. Use forced labor in the performance of the Grant or any subgrants under this Grant. b. We as the Federal awarding agency, may unilaterally terminate this Grant, without penalty, if you or a subrecipient that is a private entity:

1. Is determined to have violated a prohibition in paragraph (a) of this condition; or

2. Has an employee who is determined by the agency official authorized to terminate the Grant to have violated a prohibition in paragraph (a) of this Condition through conduct that is either –
a. Associated with performance under this Grant; or
b. Imputed to the subrecipient using the standards and due process for imputing the conduct of an individual to an organization that are provided in 2 CFR Part 180, OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government-wide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement), as implemented by our agency at 2 CFR Part 1200. c. You must inform us immediately of any information you receive from any source alleging a violation of a prohibition in paragraph (a) of this Condition. d. Our right to terminate unilaterally that is described in paragraph (a) of this Condition:

1. Implements section 106(g) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA), as amended (22 U.S.C. § 7104(g)), and
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
317 of 932

2. Is in addition to all other remedies for noncompliance that are available to us under this Grant Agreement.

23. A IP Funded Work Included in a PFC Application. Within 90 days of acceptance of this Grant Agreement, the Sponsor must submit to the FAA an amendment to any approved Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) application that contains an approved PFC project also covered under this Grant Agreement as described in the project application. The airport sponsor may not make any expenditure under this Grant Agreement until project work addressed under this Grant Agreement is removed from an approved PFC application by amendment.

24. Exhibit “A” Property Map. The Exhibit “A” Property Map dated [Enter Date], is incorporated herein by reference or is submitted with the project application and made part of this Grant Agreement.

25. Employee Protection from Reprisal.
a. Prohibition of Reprisals

1. In accordance with 41 U.S.C. § 4712, an employee of a Sponsor, grantee, subgrantee, contractor, or subcontractor may not be discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for disclosing to a person or body described in sub-paragraph (a)(2) below, information that the employee reasonably believes is evidence of:
i. Gross mismanagement of a Federal grant;
ii. Gross waste of Federal funds;
iii. An abuse of authority relating to implementation or use of Federal funds; iv. A substantial and specific danger to public health or safety; or v. A violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a Federal grant.

2. Persons and bodies covered. The persons and bodies to which a disclosure by an employee is covered are as follows:
i. A member of Congress or a representative of a committee of Congress; ii. An Inspector General;
iii. The Government Accountability Office;
iv. A Federal employee responsible for contract or grant oversight or management at the relevant agency;
v. A court or grand jury;
vi. A management official or other employee of the Sponsor, contractor, or subcontractor who has the responsibility to investigate, discover, or address misconduct; or vii. An authorized official of the Department of Justice or other law enforcement agency.

3. Submission of Complaint. A person who believes that they have been subjected to a reprisal prohibited by paragraph (a) of this Condition may submit a complaint regarding the reprisal to the Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the U.S. Department of Transportation.

4. Time Limitation for Submittal of a Complaint. A complaint may not be brought under this subsection more than three years after the date on which the alleged reprisal took place.

5. Required Actions of the Inspector General. Actions, limitations, and exceptions of the Inspector General’s office are established under 41 U.S.C. § 4712(b).

6. Assumption of Rights to Civil Remedy. Upon receipt of an explanation of a decision not to conduct or continue an investigation by the OIG, the person submitting a complaint assumes the right to a civil remedy under 41 U.S.C. § 4712(c)(2).

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
318 of 932

SPECIAL CONDITIONS

26. Buy American Executive Orders. The Sponsor agrees to abide by applicable Executive Orders in effect at the time this Grant Agreement is executed, including Executive Order 14005, Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of America’s Workers.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
319 of 932
The Sponsor’s acceptance of this Offer and ratification and adoption of the Project Application incorporated herein shall be evidenced by execution of this instrument by the Sponsor, as hereinafter provided, and this Offer and Acceptance shall comprise a Grant Agreement, constituting the contractual obligations and rights of the United States and the Sponsor with respect to the accomplishment of the Project and compliance with the Grant Assurances, terms, and conditions as provided herein. Such Grant Agreement shall become effective upon the Sponsor’s acceptance of this Offer.

Please read the following information: By signing this document, you are agreeing that you have reviewed the following consumer disclosure information and consent to transact business using electronic communications, to receive notices and disclosures electronically, and to utilize electronic signatures in lieu of using paper documents. You are not required to receive notices and disclosures or sign documents electronically. If you prefer not to do so, you may request to receive paper copies and withdraw your consent at any time.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION
{{Sig_es_:signer1:signature:dimension(height=12mm, width=70mm}} (Signature)
{{N_es_:signer1:fullname }}
(Typed Name)
{{*Ttl_es_:signer1:title }} (Title of FAA Official)

1 Knowingly and willfully providing false information to the Federal government is a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements) and could subject you to fines, imprisonment, or both.

Cathryn G. Cason (Jul 26, 2022 09:48 PDT)
Cathryn G. Cason
Cathryn G. Cason
Manager, Los Angeles Airports District Office
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
320 of 932

Part II - Acceptance
The Sponsor does hereby ratify and adopt all assurances, statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the Project Application and incorporated materials referred to in the foregoing Offer, and does hereby accept this Offer and by such acceptance agrees to comply with all of the Grant Assurances, terms, and conditions in this Offer and in the Project Application.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 2 Dated {{DateTime_es_:signer2:calc(now()):format(date," mmmm d, yyyy")}}

City of Redlands
(Name of Sponsor)

{{Sig_es_:signer2:signature:dimension(height=12mm, width=70mm}} (Signature of Sponsor’s Authorized Official)
By: {{N_es_:signer2:fullname }} (Typed Name of Sponsor’s Authorized Official)
Title: {{*Ttl_es_:signer2:title }} (Title of Sponsor’s Authorized Official)

2 Knowingly and willfully providing false information to the Federal government is a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements) and could subject you to fines, imprisonment, or both.

Paul T Barich (Jul 26, 2022 10:01 PDT)
Paul T Barich
July 26, 2022
Paul T Barich
Mayor of Redlands
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
321 of 932
CERTIFICATE OF SPONSOR’S ATTORNEY
I, {{N_es_:signer3: fullname}}, acting as Attorney for the Sponsor do hereby certify:

That in my opinion the Sponsor is empowered to enter into the foregoing Grant Agreement under the laws of the State of __California__. Further, I have examined the foregoing Grant Agreement and the actions taken by said Sponsor and Sponsor’s official representative, who has been duly authorized to execute this Grant Agreement, which is in all respects due and proper and in accordance with the laws of the said State; and Title 49, United States Code (U.S.C.), Chapters 471 and 475; 49 U.S.C. §§ 40101 et seq., and 48103; FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (Public Law Number 115-254); the Department of Transportation Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116-260, Division L); the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022 (Public Law 117-103); and the representations contained in the Project Application. In addition, for grants involving projects to be carried out on property not owned by the Sponsor, there are no legal impediments that will prevent full performance by the Sponsor. Further, it is my opinion that the said Grant Agreement constitutes a legal and binding obligation of the Sponsor in accordance with the terms thereof.

Please read the following informat
ion: By signing this document, you are agreeing that you have reviewed the following consumer disclosure information and consent to transact business using electronic communications, to receive notices and disclosures electronically, and to utilize electronic signatures in lieu of using paper documents. You are not required to receive notices and disclosures or sign documents electronically. If you prefer not to do so, you may request to receive paper copies and withdraw your consent at any time.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 3 Dated at {{DateTime_es_:signer3:calc(now()):format(date," mmmm d, yyyy")}} By: {{Sig_es_:signer3:signature:dimension(height=12mm, width=70mm}} (Signature of Sponsor’s Attorney)

3 Knowingly and willfully providing false information to the Federal government is a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (False Statements) and could subject you to fines, imprisonment, or both.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
322 of 932

ASSURANCES

AIRPORT SPONSORS
A. General.

1. These assurances shall be complied with in the performance of grant agreements for airport development, airport planning, and noise compatibility program grants for airport sponsors.

2. These assurances are required to be submitted as part of the project application by sponsors requesting funds under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C., subtitle VII, as amended. As used herein, the term "public agency sponsor" means a public agency with control of a public-use airport; the term "private sponsor" means a private owner of a public-use airport; and the term "sponsor" includes both public agency sponsors and private sponsors.

3. Upon acceptance of this grant offer by the sponsor, these assurances are incorporated in and become part of this Grant Agreement.

B. Duration and Applicability.

1. Airport development or Noise Compatibility Program Projects Undertaken by a Public Agency Sponsor.

The terms, conditions and assurances of this Grant Agreement shall remain in full force and effect throughout the useful life of the facilities developed or equipment acquired for an airport development or noise compatibility program project, or throughout the useful life of the project items installed within a facility under a noise compatibility program project, but in any event not to exceed twenty (20) years from the date of acceptance of a grant offer of Federal funds for the project. However, there shall be no limit on the duration of the assurances regarding Exclusive Rights and Airport Revenue so long as the airport is used as an airport. There shall be no limit on the duration of the terms, conditions, and assurances with respect to real property acquired with federal funds. Furthermore, the duration of the Civil Rights assurance shall be specified in the assurances.

2. Airport Development or Noise Compatibility Projects Undertaken by a Private Sponsor.

The preceding paragraph (1) also applies to a private sponsor except that the useful life of project items installed within a facility or the useful life of the facilities developed or equipment acquired under an airport development or noise compatibility program project shall be no less than ten (10) years from the date of acceptance of Federal aid for the project.

3. Airport Planning Undertaken by a Sponsor.

Unless otherwise specified in this Grant Agreement, only Assurances 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 13, 18, 23, 25, 30, 32, 33, 34, and 37 in Section C apply to planning projects. The terms, conditions, and assurances of this Grant Agreement shall remain in full force and effect during the life of the project; there shall be no limit on the duration of the assurances regarding Exclusive Rights and Airport Revenue so long as the airport is used as an airport.

C. Sponsor Certification.

The sponsor hereby assures and certifies, with respect to this grant that:

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
323 of 932

1. General Federal Requirements
It will comply with all applicable Federal laws, regulations, executive orders, policies, guidelines, and requirements as they relate to the application, acceptance, and use of Federal funds for this Grant including but not limited to the following:

FEDERAL LEGISLATION
a. 49, U.S.C., subtitle VII, as amended.
b. Davis-Bacon Act, as amended — 40 U.S.C. §§ 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147, et seq.1 c. Federal Fair Labor Standards Act - 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. d. Hatch Act – 5 U.S.C. § 1501, et seq.2
e. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 U.S.C. § 4601, et seq.1, 2
f. National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 – Section 106 - 54 U.S.C. § 306108.1.1 g. Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 - 54 U.S.C. § 312501, et seq.1 h. Native Americans Grave Repatriation Act - 25 U.S.C. Section § 3001, et seq. i. Clean Air Act, P.L. 90-148, as amended - 42 U.S.C. § 7401, et seq. j. Coastal Zone Management Act, P.L. 92-583, as amended - 16 U.S.C. § 1451, et seq. k. Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 – Section 102(a) - 42 U.S.C. § 4012a.1 l. 49 U.S.C. § 303, (formerly known as Section 4(f)).
m. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 - 29 U.S.C. § 794.
n. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin). o. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability).
p. Age Discrimination Act of 1975 - 42 U.S.C. § 6101, et seq. q. American Indian Religious Freedom Act, P.L. 95-341, as amended. r. Architectural Barriers Act of 1968, as amended - 42 U.S.C. § 4151, et seq. 1 s. Powerplant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 – Section 403 - 42 U.S.C. § 8373.1 t. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act - 40 U.S.C. § 3701, et seq.1 u. Copeland Anti-kickback Act - 18 U.S.C. § 874.1
v. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 - 42 U.S.C. § 4321, et seq.1 w. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, P.L. 90-542, as amended – 16 U.S.C. § 1271, et seq. x. Single Audit Act of 1984 - 31 U.S.C. § 7501, et seq.2 y. Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 - 41 U.S.C. §§ 8101 through 8105. z. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, as amended (P.L. 109-282, as amended by section 6202 of P.L. 110-252).

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
324 of 932
aa. Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987, P.L. 100-259. bb. Build America, Buy America Act, P.L. 117-58, Title IX.

EXECUTIVE ORDERS
a. Executive Order 11246 – Equal Employment Opportunity1 b. Executive Order 11990 – Protection of Wetlands
c. Executive Order 11998 – Flood Plain Management
d. Executive Order 12372 – Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs e. Executive Order 12699 – Seismic Safety of Federal and Federally Assisted New Building Construction1
f. Executive Order 12898 – Environmental Justice
g. Executive Order 13166 – Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency
h. Executive Order 13985 – Executive Order on Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government
i. Executive Order 13988 – Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation
j. Executive Order 14005 – Ensuring the Future is Made in all of America by All of America’s Workers
k. Executive Order 14008 – Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad

FEDERAL REGULATIONS
a. 2 CFR Part 180 – OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement).
b. 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.4, 5
c. 2 CFR Part 1200 – Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment. d. 14 CFR Part 13 – Investigative and Enforcement Procedures. e. 14 CFR Part 16 – Rules of Practice For Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings. f. 14 CFR Part 150 – Airport Noise Compatibility Planning. g. 28 CFR Part 35 – Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services.
h. 28 CFR § 50.3 – U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for the Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
i. 29 CFR Part 1 – Procedures for Predetermination of Wage Rates.1 j. 29 CFR Part 3 – Contractors and Subcontractors on Public Building or Public Work Financed in Whole or in Part by Loans or Grants from the United States.1 Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
325 of 932
k. 29 CFR Part 5 – Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Contracts Covering Federally Financed and Assisted Construction (Also Labor Standards Provisions Applicable to Nonconstruction Contracts Subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act).1 l. 41 CFR Part 60 – Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor (Federal and Federally-assisted contracting requirements).1 m. 49 CFR Part 20 – New Restrictions on Lobbying.
n. 49 CFR Part 21 – Nondiscrimination in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation - Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. o. 49 CFR Part 23 – Participation by Disadvantage Business Enterprise in Airport Concessions. p. 49 CFR Part 24 – Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition for Federal and Federally-Assisted Programs.1 2
q. 49 CFR Part 26 – Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs.
r. 49 CFR Part 27 – Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in Programs or Activities Receiving Federal Financial Assistance.1
s. 49 CFR Part 28 – Enforcement of Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs or Activities Conducted by the Department of Transportation. t. 49 CFR Part 30 – Denial of Public Works Contracts to Suppliers of Goods and Services of Countries That Deny Procurement Market Access to U.S. Contractors. u. 49 CFR Part 32 – Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance).
v. 49 CFR Part 37 – Transportation Services for Individuals with Disabilities (ADA). w. 49 CFR Part 38 – Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Specifications for Transportation Vehicles.
x. 49 CFR Part 41 – Seismic Safety.

FOOTNOTES TO ASSURANCE (C)(1)
1 These laws do not apply to airport planning sponsors. 2 These laws do not apply to private sponsors.
3 2 CFR Part 200 contains requirements for State and Local Governments receiving Federal assistance. Any requirement levied upon State and Local Governments by this regulation shall apply where applicable to private sponsors receiving Federal assistance under Title 49, United States Code.
4 Cost principles established in 2 CFR part 200 subpart E must be used as guidelines for determining the eligibility of specific types of expenses. 5 Audit requirements established in 2 CFR part 200 subpart F are the guidelines for audits.

SPECIFIC ASSURANCES
Specific assurances required to be included in grant agreements by any of the above laws, regulations or circulars are incorporated by reference in this grant agreement.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
326 of 932

2. Responsibility and Authority of the Sponsor.
a. Public Agency Sponsor:

It has legal authority to apply for this Grant, and to finance and carry out the proposed project; that a resolution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the applicant's governing body authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional information as may be required. b. Private Sponsor:

It has legal authority to apply for this Grant and to finance and carry out the proposed project and comply with all terms, conditions, and assurances of this Grant Agreement. It shall designate an official representative and shall in writing direct and authorize that person to file this application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein; to act in connection with this application; and to provide such additional information as may be required.

3. Sponsor Fund Availability.

It has sufficient funds available for that portion of the project costs which are not to be paid by the United States. It has sufficient funds available to assure operation and maintenance of items funded under this Grant Agreement which it will own or control.

4. Good Title.
a. It, a public agency or the Federal government, holds good title, satisfactory to the Secretary, to the landing area of the airport or site thereof, or will give assurance satisfactory to the Secretary that good title will be acquired.
b. For noise compatibility program projects to be carried out on the property of the sponsor, it holds good title satisfactory to the Secretary to that portion of the property upon which Federal funds will be expended or will give assurance to the Secretary that good title will be obtained.

5. Preserving Rights and Powers.
a. It will not take or permit any action which would operate to deprive it of any of the rights and powers necessary to perform any or all of the terms, conditions, and assurances in this Grant Agreement without the written approval of the Secretary, and will act promptly to acquire, extinguish or modify any outstanding rights or claims of right of others which would interfere with such performance by the sponsor. This shall be done in a manner acceptable to the Secretary.
b. Subject to the FAA Act of 2018, Public Law 115-254, Section 163, it will not sell, lease, encumber, or otherwise transfer or dispose of any part of its title or other interests in the property shown on Exhibit A to this application or, for a noise compatibility program project, that portion of the property upon which Federal funds have been expended, for the duration of the terms, conditions, and assurances in this Grant Agreement without approval by the Secretary. If the transferee is found by the Secretary to be eligible under Title 49, United States Code, to assume the obligations of this Grant Agreement and to have the power, authority, and financial resources to carry out all such obligations, the sponsor shall insert in the contract or Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
327 of 932
document transferring or disposing of the sponsor's interest, and make binding upon the transferee all of the terms, conditions, and assurances contained in this Grant Agreement. c. For all noise compatibility program projects which are to be carried out by another unit of local government or are on property owned by a unit of local government other than the sponsor, it will enter into an agreement with that government. Except as otherwise specified by the Secretary, that agreement shall obligate that government to the same terms, conditions, and assurances that would be applicable to it if it applied directly to the FAA for a grant to undertake the noise compatibility program project. That agreement and changes thereto must be satisfactory to the Secretary. It will take steps to enforce this agreement against the local government if there is substantial non-compliance with the terms of the agreement. d. For noise compatibility program projects to be carried out on privately owned property, it will enter into an agreement with the owner of that property which includes provisions specified by the Secretary. It will take steps to enforce this agreement against the property owner whenever there is substantial non-compliance with the terms of the agreement. e. If the sponsor is a private sponsor, it will take steps satisfactory to the Secretary to ensure that the airport will continue to function as a public-use airport in accordance with these assurances for the duration of these assurances.
f. If an arrangement is made for management and operation of the airport by any agency or person other than the sponsor or an employee of the sponsor, the sponsor will reserve sufficient rights and authority to ensure that the airport will be operated and maintained in accordance with Title 49, United States Code, the regulations and the terms, conditions and assurances in this Grant Agreement and shall ensure that such arrangement also requires compliance therewith.
g. Sponsors of commercial service airports will not permit or enter into any arrangement that results in permission for the owner or tenant of a property used as a residence, or zoned for residential use, to taxi an aircraft between that property and any location on airport. Sponsors of general aviation airports entering into any arrangement that results in permission for the owner of residential real property adjacent to or near the airport must comply with the requirements of Sec. 136 of Public Law 112-95 and the sponsor assurances.

6. Consistency with Local Plans.

The project is reasonably consistent with plans (existing at the time of submission of this application) of public agencies that are authorized by the State in which the project is located to plan for the development of the area surrounding the airport.

7. Consideration of Local Interest.

It has given fair consideration to the interest of communities in or near where the project may be located.

8. Consultation with Users.

In making a decision to undertake any airport development project under Title 49, United States Code, it has undertaken reasonable consultations with affected parties using the airport at which project is proposed.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
328 of 932

9. Public Hearings.

In projects involving the location of an airport, an airport runway, or a major runway extension, it has afforded the opportunity for public hearings for the purpose of considering the economic, social, and environmental effects of the airport or runway location and its consistency with goals and objectives of such planning as has been carried out by the community and it shall, when requested by the Secretary, submit a copy of the transcript of such hearings to the Secretary.

Further, for such projects, it has on its management board either voting representation from the communities where the project is located or has advised the communities that they have the right to petition the Secretary concerning a proposed project.

10. Metropolitan Planning Organization.

In projects involving the location of an airport, an airport runway, or a major runway extension at a medium or large hub airport, the sponsor has made available to and has provided upon request to the metropolitan planning organization in the area in which the airport is located, if any, a copy of the proposed amendment to the airport layout plan to depict the project and a copy of any airport master plan in which the project is described or depicted.

11. Pavement Preventive Maintenance-Management.

With respect to a project approved after January 1, 1995, for the replacement or reconstruction of pavement at the airport, it assures or certifies that it has implemented an effective airport pavement maintenance-management program and it assures that it will use such program for the useful life of any pavement constructed, reconstructed or repaired with Federal financial assistance at the airport. It will provide such reports on pavement condition and pavement management programs as the Secretary determines may be useful.

12. Terminal Development Prerequisites.

For projects which include terminal development at a public use airport, as defined in Title 49, it has, on the date of submittal of the project grant application, all the safety equipment required for certification of such airport under 49 U.S.C. § 44706, and all the security equipment required by rule or regulation, and has provided for access to the passenger enplaning and deplaning area of such airport to passengers enplaning and deplaning from aircraft other than air carrier aircraft.

13. Accounting System, Audit, and Record Keeping Requirements. a. It shall keep all project accounts and records which fully disclose the amount and disposition by the recipient of the proceeds of this Grant, the total cost of the project in connection with which this Grant is given or used, and the amount or nature of that portion of the cost of the project supplied by other sources, and such other financial records pertinent to the project. The accounts and records shall be kept in accordance with an accounting system that will facilitate an effective audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984. b. It shall make available to the Secretary and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, for the purpose of audit and examination, any books, documents, papers, and records of the recipient that are pertinent to this Grant. The Secretary may require that an appropriate audit be conducted by a recipient. In any case in which an independent audit is made of the accounts of a sponsor relating to the disposition of the proceeds of a Grant or relating to the project in connection with which this Grant was given or used, it shall file a certified copy of such audit with the Comptroller General of the United Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
329 of 932
States not later than six (6) months following the close of the fiscal year for which the audit was made.

14. Minimum Wage Rates.

It shall include, in all contracts in excess of $2,000 for work on any projects funded under this Grant Agreement which involve labor, provisions establishing minimum rates of wages, to be predetermined by the Secretary of Labor under 40 U.S.C. §§ 3141-3144, 3146, and 3147, Public Building, Property, and Works), which contractors shall pay to skilled and unskilled labor, and such minimum rates shall be stated in the invitation for bids and shall be included in proposals or bids for the work.

15. Veteran's Preference.

It shall include in all contracts for work on any project funded under this Grant Agreement which involve labor, such provisions as are necessary to insure that, in the employment of labor (except in executive, administrative, and supervisory positions), preference shall be given to Vietnam era veterans, Persian Gulf veterans, Afghanistan-Iraq war veterans, disabled veterans, and small business concerns owned and controlled by disabled veterans as defined in 49 U.S.C. § 47112.

However, this preference shall apply only where the individuals are available and qualified to perform the work to which the employment relates.

16. Conformity to Plans and Specifications.

It will execute the project subject to plans, specifications, and schedules approved by the Secretary.

Such plans, specifications, and schedules shall be submitted to the Secretary prior to commencement of site preparation, construction, or other performance under this Grant Agreement, and, upon approval of the Secretary, shall be incorporated into this Grant Agreement.

Any modification to the approved plans, specifications, and schedules shall also be subject to approval of the Secretary, and incorporated into this Grant Agreement.

17. Construction Inspection and Approval.

It will provide and maintain competent technical supervision at the construction site throughout the project to assure that the work conforms to the plans, specifications, and schedules approved by the Secretary for the project. It shall subject the construction work on any project contained in an approved project application to inspection and approval by the Secretary and such work shall be in accordance with regulations and procedures prescribed by the Secretary. Such regulations and procedures shall require such cost and progress reporting by the sponsor or sponsors of such project as the Secretary shall deem necessary.

18. Planning Projects.

In carrying out planning projects:
a. It will execute the project in accordance with the approved program narrative contained in the project application or with the modifications similarly approved. b. It will furnish the Secretary with such periodic reports as required pertaining to the planning project and planning work activities.
c. It will include in all published material prepared in connection with the planning project a notice that the material was prepared under a grant provided by the United States.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
330 of 932
d. It will make such material available for examination by the public, and agrees that no material prepared with funds under this project shall be subject to copyright in the United States or any other country.
e. It will give the Secretary unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use any of the material prepared in connection with this grant. f. It will grant the Secretary the right to disapprove the sponsor's employment of specific consultants and their subcontractors to do all or any part of this project as well as the right to disapprove the proposed scope and cost of professional services. g. It will grant the Secretary the right to disapprove the use of the sponsor's employees to do all or any part of the project.
h. It understands and agrees that the Secretary's approval of this project grant or the Secretary's approval of any planning material developed as part of this grant does not constitute or imply any assurance or commitment on the part of the Secretary to approve any pending or future application for a Federal airport grant.

19. Operation and Maintenance.
a. The airport and all facilities which are necessary to serve the aeronautical users of the airport, other than facilities owned or controlled by the United States, shall be operated at all times in a safe and serviceable condition and in accordance with the minimum standards as may be required or prescribed by applicable Federal, State and local agencies for maintenance and operation. It will not cause or permit any activity or action thereon which would interfere with its use for airport purposes. It will suitably operate and maintain the airport and all facilities thereon or connected therewith, with due regard to climatic and flood conditions. Any proposal to temporarily close the airport for non-aeronautical purposes must first be approved by the Secretary. In furtherance of this assurance, the sponsor will have in effect arrangements for:

1. Operating the airport's aeronautical facilities whenever required;

2. Promptly marking and lighting hazards resulting from airport conditions, including temporary conditions; and

3. Promptly notifying pilots of any condition affecting aeronautical use of the airport. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to require that the airport be operated for aeronautical use during temporary periods when snow, flood, or other climatic conditions interfere with such operation and maintenance. Further, nothing herein shall be construed as requiring the maintenance, repair, restoration, or replacement of any structure or facility which is substantially damaged or destroyed due to an act of God or other condition or circumstance beyond the control of the sponsor. b. It will suitably operate and maintain noise compatibility program items that it owns or controls upon which Federal funds have been expended.

20. Hazard Removal and Mitigation.

It will take appropriate action to assure that such terminal airspace as is required to protect instrument and visual operations to the airport (including established minimum flight altitudes) will be adequately cleared and protected by removing, lowering, relocating, marking, or lighting or otherwise mitigating existing airport hazards and by preventing the establishment or creation of future airport hazards.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
331 of 932

21. Compatible Land Use.

It will take appropriate action, to the extent reasonable, including the adoption of zoning laws, to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations, including landing and takeoff of aircraft. In addition, if the project is for noise compatibility program implementation, it will not cause or permit any change in land use, within its jurisdiction, that will reduce its compatibility, with respect to the airport, of the noise compatibility program measures upon which Federal funds have been expended.

22. Economic Nondiscrimination.
a. It will make the airport available as an airport for public use on reasonable terms and without unjust discrimination to all types, kinds and classes of aeronautical activities, including commercial aeronautical activities offering services to the public at the airport. b. In any agreement, contract, lease, or other arrangement under which a right or privilege at the airport is granted to any person, firm, or corporation to conduct or to engage in any aeronautical activity for furnishing services to the public at the airport, the sponsor will insert and enforce provisions requiring the contractor to:

1. Furnish said services on a reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory, basis to all users thereof, and

2. Charge reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory, prices for each unit or service, provided that the contractor may be allowed to make reasonable and nondiscriminatory discounts, rebates, or other similar types of price reductions to volume purchasers. c. Each fixed-based operator at the airport shall be subject to the same rates, fees, rentals, and other charges as are uniformly applicable to all other fixed-based operators making the same or similar uses of such airport and utilizing the same or similar facilities. d. Each air carrier using such airport shall have the right to service itself or to use any fixed-based operator that is authorized or permitted by the airport to serve any air carrier at such airport. e. Each air carrier using such airport (whether as a tenant, non-tenant, or subtenant of another air carrier tenant) shall be subject to such nondiscriminatory and substantially comparable rules, regulations, conditions, rates, fees, rentals, and other charges with respect to facilities directly and substantially related to providing air transportation as are applicable to all such air carriers which make similar use of such airport and utilize similar facilities, subject to reasonable classifications such as tenants or non-tenants and signatory carriers and non-signatory carriers.

Classification or status as tenant or signatory shall not be unreasonably withheld by any airport provided an air carrier assumes obligations substantially similar to those already imposed on air carriers in such classification or status.
f. It will not exercise or grant any right or privilege which operates to prevent any person, firm, or corporation operating aircraft on the airport from performing any services on its own aircraft with its own employees (including, but not limited to maintenance, repair, and fueling) that it may choose to perform.
g. In the event the sponsor itself exercises any of the rights and privileges referred to in this assurance, the services involved will be provided on the same conditions as would apply to the furnishing of such services by commercial aeronautical service providers authorized by the sponsor under these provisions.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
332 of 932
h. The sponsor may establish such reasonable, and not unjustly discriminatory, conditions to be met by all users of the airport as may be necessary for the safe and efficient operation of the airport.
i. The sponsor may prohibit or limit any given type, kind or class of aeronautical use of the airport if such action is necessary for the safe operation of the airport or necessary to serve the civil aviation needs of the public.

23. Exclusive Rights.

It will permit no exclusive right for the use of the airport by any person providing, or intending to provide, aeronautical services to the public. For purposes of this paragraph, the providing of the services at an airport by a single fixed-based operator shall not be construed as an exclusive right if both of the following apply:
a. It would be unreasonably costly, burdensome, or impractical for more than one fixed-based operator to provide such services, and
b. If allowing more than one fixed-based operator to provide such services would require the reduction of space leased pursuant to an existing agreement between such single fixed-based operator and such airport. It further agrees that it will not, either directly or indirectly, grant or permit any person, firm, or corporation, the exclusive right at the airport to conduct any aeronautical activities, including, but not limited to charter flights, pilot training, aircraft rental and sightseeing, aerial photography, crop dusting, aerial advertising and surveying, air carrier operations, aircraft sales and services, sale of aviation petroleum products whether or not conducted in conjunction with other aeronautical activity, repair and maintenance of aircraft, sale of aircraft parts, and any other activities which because of their direct relationship to the operation of aircraft can be regarded as an aeronautical activity, and that it will terminate any exclusive right to conduct an aeronautical activity now existing at such an airport before the grant of any assistance under Title 49, United States Code.

24. Fee and Rental Structure.

It will maintain a fee and rental structure for the facilities and services at the airport which will make the airport as self-sustaining as possible under the circumstances existing at the particular airport, taking into account such factors as the volume of traffic and economy of collection. No part of the Federal share of an airport development, airport planning or noise compatibility project for which a Grant is made under Title 49, United States Code, the Airport and Airway Improvement Act of 1982, the Federal Airport Act or the Airport and Airway Development Act of 1970 shall be included in the rate basis in establishing fees, rates, and charges for users of that airport.

25. Airport Revenues.
a. All revenues generated by the airport and any local taxes on aviation fuel established after December 30, 1987, will be expended by it for the capital or operating costs of the airport; the local airport system; or other local facilities which are owned or operated by the owner or operator of the airport and which are directly and substantially related to the actual air transportation of passengers or property; or for noise mitigation purposes on or off the airport.

The following exceptions apply to this paragraph:

1. If covenants or assurances in debt obligations issued before September 3, 1982, by the owner or operator of the airport, or provisions enacted before September 3, 1982, in governing statutes controlling the owner or operator's financing, provide for the use of the Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
333 of 932
revenues from any of the airport owner or operator's facilities, including the airport, to support not only the airport but also the airport owner or operator's general debt obligations or other facilities, then this limitation on the use of all revenues generated by the airport (and, in the case of a public airport, local taxes on aviation fuel) shall not apply.

2. If the Secretary approves the sale of a privately owned airport to a public sponsor and provides funding for any portion of the public sponsor’s acquisition of land, this limitation on the use of all revenues generated by the sale shall not apply to certain proceeds from the sale. This is conditioned on repayment to the Secretary by the private owner of an amount equal to the remaining unamortized portion (amortized over a 20-year period) of any airport improvement grant made to the private owner for any purpose other than land acquisition on or after October 1, 1996, plus an amount equal to the federal share of the current fair market value of any land acquired with an airport improvement grant made to that airport on or after October 1, 1996.

3. Certain revenue derived from or generated by mineral extraction, production, lease, or other means at a general aviation airport (as defined at 49 U.S.C. § 47102), if the FAA determines the airport sponsor meets the requirements set forth in Section 813 of Public Law 112-95
b. As part of the annual audit required under the Single Audit Act of 1984, the sponsor will direct that the audit will review, and the resulting audit report will provide an opinion concerning, the use of airport revenue and taxes in paragraph (a), and indicating whether funds paid or transferred to the owner or operator are paid or transferred in a manner consistent with Title 49, United States Code and any other applicable provision of law, including any regulation promulgated by the Secretary or Administrator.
c. Any civil penalties or other sanctions will be imposed for violation of this assurance in accordance with the provisions of 49 U.S.C. § 47107.

26. Reports and Inspections.

It will:
a. submit to the Secretary such annual or special financial and operations reports as the Secretary may reasonably request and make such reports available to the public; make available to the public at reasonable times and places a report of the airport budget in a format prescribed by the Secretary;
b. for airport development projects, make the airport and all airport records and documents affecting the airport, including deeds, leases, operation and use agreements, regulations and other instruments, available for inspection by any duly authorized agent of the Secretary upon reasonable request;
c. for noise compatibility program projects, make records and documents relating to the project and continued compliance with the terms, conditions, and assurances of this Grant Agreement including deeds, leases, agreements, regulations, and other instruments, available for inspection by any duly authorized agent of the Secretary upon reasonable request; and d. in a format and time prescribed by the Secretary, provide to the Secretary and make available to the public following each of its fiscal years, an annual report listing in detail:

1. all amounts paid by the airport to any other unit of government and the purposes for which each such payment was made; and
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
334 of 932

2. all services and property provided by the airport to other units of government and the amount of compensation received for provision of each such service and property.

27. Use by Government Aircraft.

It will make available all of the facilities of the airport developed with Federal financial assistance and all those usable for landing and takeoff of aircraft to the United States for use by Government aircraft in common with other aircraft at all times without charge, except, if the use by Government aircraft is substantial, charge may be made for a reasonable share, proportional to such use, for the cost of operating and maintaining the facilities used. Unless otherwise determined by the Secretary, or otherwise agreed to by the sponsor and the using agency, substantial use of an airport by Government aircraft will be considered to exist when operations of such aircraft are in excess of those which, in the opinion of the Secretary, would unduly interfere with use of the landing areas by other authorized aircraft, or during any calendar month that:
a. Five (5) or more Government aircraft are regularly based at the airport or on land adjacent thereto; or
b. The total number of movements (counting each landing as a movement) of Government aircraft is 300 or more, or the gross accumulative weight of Government aircraft using the airport (the total movement of Government aircraft multiplied by gross weights of such aircraft) is in excess of five million pounds.

28. Land for Federal Facilities.

It will furnish without cost to the Federal Government for use in connection with any air traffic control or air navigation activities, or weather-reporting and communication activities related to air traffic control, any areas of land or water, or estate therein as the Secretary considers necessary or desirable for construction, operation, and maintenance at Federal expense of space or facilities for such purposes. Such areas or any portion thereof will be made available as provided herein within four months after receipt of a written request from the Secretary.

29. Airport Layout Plan.
a. Subject to the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, Public Law 115-254, Section 163, it will keep up to date at all times an airport layout plan of the airport showing:

1. boundaries of the airport and all proposed additions thereto, together with the boundaries of all offsite areas owned or controlled by the sponsor for airport purposes and proposed additions thereto;

2. the location and nature of all existing and proposed airport facilities and structures (such as runways, taxiways, aprons, terminal buildings, hangars and roads), including all proposed extensions and reductions of existing airport facilities;

3. the location of all existing and proposed non-aviation areas and of all existing improvements thereon; and

4. all proposed and existing access points used to taxi aircraft across the airport’s property boundary.

Such airport layout plans and each amendment, revision, or modification thereof, shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary which approval shall be evidenced by the signature of a duly authorized representative of the Secretary on the face of the airport layout plan. The Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
335 of 932
sponsor will not make or permit any changes or alterations in the airport or any of its facilities which are not in conformity with the airport layout plan as approved by the Secretary and which might, in the opinion of the Secretary, adversely affect the safety, utility or efficiency of the airport.
b. Subject to the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, Public Law 115-254, Section 163, if a change or alteration in the airport or the facilities is made which the Secretary determines adversely affects the safety, utility, or efficiency of any federally owned, leased, or funded property on or off the airport and which is not in conformity with the airport layout plan as approved by the Secretary, the owner or operator will, if requested, by the Secretary:

1. eliminate such adverse effect in a manner approved by the Secretary; or

2. bear all costs of relocating such property (or replacement thereof) to a site acceptable to the Secretary and all costs of restoring such property (or replacement thereof) to the level of safety, utility, efficiency, and cost of operation existing before the unapproved change in the airport or its facilities except in the case of a relocation or replacement of an existing airport facility due to a change in the Secretary’s design standards beyond the control of the airport sponsor.

30. Civil Rights.

It will promptly take any measures necessary to ensure that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, color, and national origin (including limited English proficiency) in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-4); creed and sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity) per 49 U.S.C. § 47123 and related requirements; age per the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and related requirements; or disability per the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and related requirements, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in any program and activity conducted with, or benefiting from, funds received from this Grant. a. Using the definitions of activity, facility, and program as found and defined in 49 CFR §§

21.23(b) and 21.23(e), the sponsor will facilitate all programs, operate all facilities, or conduct all programs in compliance with all non-discrimination requirements imposed by or pursuant to these assurances.
b. Applicability

1. Programs and Activities. If the sponsor has received a grant (or other federal assistance) for any of the sponsor’s program or activities, these requirements extend to all of the sponsor’s programs and activities.

2. Facilities. Where it receives a grant or other federal financial assistance to construct, expand, renovate, remodel, alter, or acquire a facility, or part of a facility, the assurance extends to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith.

3. Real Property. Where the sponsor receives a grant or other Federal financial assistance in the form of, or for the acquisition of real property or an interest in real property, the assurance will extend to rights to space on, over, or under such property. c. Duration.

The sponsor agrees that it is obligated to this assurance for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
336 of 932
to provide, or is in the form of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the assurance obligates the sponsor, or any transferee for the longer of the following periods:

1. So long as the airport is used as an airport, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or

2. So long as the sponsor retains ownership or possession of the property. d. Required Solicitation Language. It will include the following notification in all solicitations for bids, Requests For Proposals for work, or material under this Grant Agreement and in all proposals for agreements, including airport concessions, regardless of funding source:
“The (City of Redlands), in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders or offerors that it will affirmatively ensure that for any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, [select businesses, or disadvantaged business enterprises or airport concession disadvantaged business enterprises] will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and no businesses will be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency), creed, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), age, or disability in consideration for an award.”
e. R
equired Contract Provisions.

1. It will insert the non-discrimination contract clauses requiring compliance with the acts and regulations relative to non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the Department of Transportation (DOT), and incorporating the acts and regulations into the contracts by reference in every contract or agreement subject to the non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the DOT acts and regulations.

2. It will include a list of the pertinent non-discrimination authorities in every contract that is subject to the non-discrimination acts and regulations.

3. It will insert non-discrimination contract clauses as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property, structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a sponsor.

4. It will insert non-discrimination contract clauses prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency), creed, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), age, or disability as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, license, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the sponsor with other parties:
a. For the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program; and
b. For the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program. f. It will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interest, and other Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
337 of 932
participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the acts, the regulations, and this assurance. g. It agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the acts, the regulations, and this assurance.

31. Disposal of Land.
a. For land purchased under a grant for airport noise compatibility purposes, including land serving as a noise buffer, it will dispose of the land, when the land is no longer needed for such purposes, at fair market value, at the earliest practicable time. That portion of the proceeds of such disposition which is proportionate to the United States' share of acquisition of such land will be, at the discretion of the Secretary, (1) reinvested in another project at the airport, or (2) transferred to another eligible airport as prescribed by the Secretary. The Secretary shall give preference to the following, in descending order:

1. Reinvestment in an approved noise compatibility project;

2. Reinvestment in an approved project that is eligible for grant funding under 49 U.S.C. § 47117(e);

3. Reinvestment in an approved airport development project that is eligible for grant funding under 49 U.S.C. §§ 47114, 47115, or 47117

4. Transfer to an eligible sponsor of another public airport to be reinvested in an approved noise compatibility project at that airport; or

5. Payment to the Secretary for deposit in the Airport and Airway Trust Fund.

If land acquired under a grant for noise compatibility purposes is leased at fair market value and consistent with noise buffering purposes, the lease will not be considered a disposal of the land. Revenues derived from such a lease may be used for an approved airport development project that would otherwise be eligible for grant funding or any permitted use of airport revenue.
b. For land purchased under a grant for airport development purposes (other than noise compatibility), it will, when the land is no longer needed for airport purposes, dispose of such land at fair market value or make available to the Secretary an amount equal to the United States' proportionate share of the fair market value of the land. That portion of the proceeds of such disposition which is proportionate to the United States' share of the cost of acquisition of such land will, upon application to the Secretary, be reinvested or transferred to another eligible airport as prescribed by the Secretary. The Secretary shall give preference to the following, in descending order:

1. Reinvestment in an approved noise compatibility project;

2. Reinvestment in an approved project that is eligible for grant funding under 49 U.S.C. § 47117(e);

3. Reinvestment in an approved airport development project that is eligible for grant funding under 49 U.S.C. §§ 47114, 47115, or 47117

4. Transfer to an eligible sponsor of another public airport to be reinvested in an approved noise compatibility project at that airport; or

5. Payment to the Secretary for deposit in the Airport and Airway Trust Fund.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
338 of 932
c. Land shall be considered to be needed for airport purposes under this assurance if (1) it may be needed for aeronautical purposes (including runway protection zones) or serve as noise buffer land, and (2) the revenue from interim uses of such land contributes to the financial self- sufficiency of the airport. Further, land purchased with a grant received by an airport operator or owner before December 31, 1987, will be considered to be needed for airport purposes if the Secretary or Federal agency making such grant before December 31, 1987, was notified by the operator or owner of the uses of such land, did not object to such use, and the land continues to be used for that purpose, such use having commenced no later than December 15, 1989.
d. Disposition of such land under (a), (b), or (c) will be subject to the retention or reservation of any interest or right therein necessary to ensure that such land will only be used for purposes which are compatible with noise levels associated with operation of the airport.

32. Engineering and Design Services.

If any phase of such project has received Federal funds under Chapter 471 subchapter 1 of Title 49 U.S.C., it will award each contract, or sub-contract for program management, construction management, planning studies, feasibility studies, architectural services, preliminary engineering, design, engineering, surveying, mapping or related services in the same manner as a contract for architectural and engineering services is negotiated under Chapter 11 of Title 40 U.S.C., or an equivalent qualifications-based requirement prescribed for or by the sponsor of the airport.

33. Foreign Market Restrictions.

It will not allow funds provided under this Grant to be used to fund any project which uses any product or service of a foreign country during the period in which such foreign country is listed by the United States Trade Representative as denying fair and equitable market opportunities for products and suppliers of the United States in procurement and construction.

34. Policies, Standards, and Specifications.

It will carry out any project funded under an Airport Improvement Program Grant in accordance with policies, standards, and specifications approved by the Secretary including, but not limited to, current FAA Advisory Circulars (https://www.faa.gov/airports/aip/media/aip-pfc-checklist.pdf) for AIP projects as of July 15, 2022.

35. R elocation and Real Property Acquisition.
a. It will be guided in acquiring real property, to the greatest extent practicable under State law, by the land acquisition policies in Subpart B of 49 CFR Part 24 and will pay or reimburse property owners for necessary expenses as specified in Subpart B. b. It will provide a relocation assistance program offering the services described in Subpart C of 49 CFR Part 24 and fair and reasonable relocation payments and assistance to displaced persons as required in Subpart D and E of 49 CFR Part 24.
c. It will make available within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement, comparable replacement dwellings to displaced persons in accordance with Subpart E of 49 CFR Part 24.

36. Access By Intercity Buses.

The airport owner or operator will permit, to the maximum extent practicable, intercity buses or other modes of transportation to have access to the airport; however, it has no obligation to fund special facilities for intercity buses or for other modes of transportation.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
339 of 932

37. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises.

The sponsor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex, in the award and performance of any DOT-assisted contract covered by 49 CFR Part 26, or in the award and performance of any concession activity contract covered by 49 CFR Part 23. In addition, the sponsor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the administration of its Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concessions Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) programs or the requirements of 49 CFR Parts 23 and 26. The sponsor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Parts 23 and 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts, and/or concession contracts. The sponsor’s DBE and ACDBE programs, as required by 49 CFR Parts 26 and 23, and as approved by DOT, are incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of these programs is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the sponsor of its failure to carry out its approved program, the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under Parts 26 and 23 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. §§ 3801-3809, 3812).

38. Hangar Construction.

If the airport owner or operator and a person who owns an aircraft agree that a hangar is to be constructed at the airport for the aircraft at the aircraft owner’s expense, the airport owner or operator will grant to the aircraft owner for the hangar a long term lease that is subject to such terms and conditions on the hangar as the airport owner or operator may impose.

39. Competitive Access.
a. If the airport owner or operator of a medium or large hub airport (as defined in 49 U.S.C. § 47102) has been unable to accommodate one or more requests by an air carrier for access to gates or other facilities at that airport in order to allow the air carrier to provide service to the airport or to expand service at the airport, the airport owner or operator shall transmit a report to the Secretary that:

1. Describes the requests;

2. Provides an explanation as to why the requests could not be accommodated; and

3. Provides a time frame within which, if any, the airport will be able to accommodate the requests.
b. Such report shall be due on either February 1 or August 1 of each year if the airport has been unable to accommodate the request(s) in the six month period prior to the applicable due date.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
340 of 932

ASSURANCES

PLANNING AGENCY SPONSORS
A. General.

1. These assurances shall be complied with in the performance of grant agreements for airport development, airport planning, and noise compatibility program grants for airport sponsors.

3. Upon acceptance of this grant offer by the sponsor, these assurances are incorporated in and become part of this Grant Agreement.

B. Duration and Applicability.

The terms, conditions and assurances of this Grant Agreement shall remain in full force and effect during the life of the project.

C. Sponsor Certification.

The sponsor hereby assures and certifies, with respect to this grant that:

1. General Federal Requirements
It will comply with all applicable Federal laws, regulations, executive orders, policies, guidelines, and requirements as they relate to the application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this project including but not limited to the following:

FEDERAL LEGISLATION
a. 49, U.S.C., subtitle VII, as amended.
b. Federal Fair Labor Standards Act - 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. c. Hatch Act – 5 U.S.C. § 1501, et seq.1
d. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 – 29 U.S.C. § 794
e. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin). f. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability).
g. Age Discrimination Act of 1975 - 42 U.S.C. § 6101, et seq. h. Single Audit Act of 1984 - 31 U.S.C. § 7501, et seq. 1 i. Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 - 41 U.S.C. § 8101 through 8105. j. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, as amended (Pub. L. 109-282, as amended by section 6202 of Public Law 110-252).
k. Build America, Buy America Act, P.L. 117-58, Title IX.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
341 of 932

EXECUTIVE ORDERS
a. Executive Order 12372 - Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs b. Executive Order 13166 – Improving Access to Services for Persons with Limited English Proficiency
c. Executive Order 13985 – Executive Order on Advancing Racial Equity and Support for Underserved Communities Through the Federal Government
d. Executive Order 13988 – Preventing and Combating Discrimination on the Basis of Gender Identity or Sexual Orientation
e. Executive Order 14005 – Ensuring the Future is Made in all of America by All of America’s Workers
f. Executive Order 14008 - Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad

FEDERAL REGULATIONS
a. 2 CFR Part 180 – OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement).
b. 2 CFR Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.3, 4
c. 2 CFR Part 1200 – Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment. d. 14 CFR Part 13 – Investigative and Enforcement Procedures. e. 14 CFR Part 16 – Rules of Practice for Federally-Assisted Airport Enforcement Proceedings. f. 28 CFR Part 35 – Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services.
g. 28 CFR § 50.3 – U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for the Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
h. 49 CFR Part 20 – New Restrictions on Lobbying.
i. 49 CFR Part 21 – Nondiscrimination in Federally-Assisted Programs of the Department of Transportation – Effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. j. 49 CFR Part 26 – Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Financial Assistance Programs.
k. 49 CFR Part 28 – Enforcement of Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs or Activities Conducted by the Department of Transportation. l. 49 CFR Part 30 – Denial of Public Works Contracts to Suppliers of Goods and Services of Countries That Deny Procurement Market Access to U.S. Contractors. m. 49 CFR Part 32 – Governmentwide Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance) FOOTNOTES TO ASSURANCE C.1.
1 These laws do not apply to private sponsors.
2 2 CFR Part 200 contain requirements for State and Local Governments receiving Federal assistance. Any requirement levied upon State and Local Governments by this regulation shall Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
342 of 932
apply where applicable to private sponsors receiving Federal assistance under Title 49, United States Code.
3 Cost principles established in 2 CFR part 200 subpart E must be used as guidelines for determining the eligibility of specific types of expenses. 4 Audit requirements established in 2 CFR part 200 subpart F are the guidelines for audits.

SPECIFIC ASSURANCES
Specific assurances required to be included in grant agreements by any of the above laws, regulations or circulars are incorporated by reference in this Grant Agreement.

2. Responsibility and Authority of the Sponsor.

It has legal authority to apply for this grant, and to finance and carry out the proposed project; that a resolution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the applicant’s governing body authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional information as may be required.

3. Sponsor Fund Availability.

It has sufficient funds available for that portion of the project costs which are not to be paid by the United States.

4. Preserving Rights and Powers
It will not take or permit any action which would operate to deprive it of any of the rights and powers necessary to perform any or all of the terms, conditions, and assurances in this Grant Agreement without the written approval of the Secretary

5. Consistency with Local Plans.

The project is reasonably consistent with plans (existing at the time of submission of this application) of public agencies in the planning area.

6. Accounting System, Audit, and Record Keeping Requirements a. It shall keep all project accounts and records which fully disclose the amount and disposition by the recipient of the proceeds of this Grant, the total cost of the project in connection with which this Grant is given or used, and the amount or nature of that portion of the cost of the project supplied by other sources, and such other financial records pertinent to the project. The accounts and records shall be kept in accordance with an accounting system that will facilitate an effective audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984. b. It shall make available to the Secretary and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, for the purpose of audit and examination, any books, documents, papers, and records of the recipient that are pertinent to this Grant. The Secretary may require that an appropriate audit be conducted by a recipient. In any case in which an independent audit is made of the accounts of a sponsor relating to the disposition of the proceeds of a grant or relating to the project in connection with which this Grant was given or used, it shall file a certified copy of such audit with the Comptroller General of the United States not later than six (6) months following the close of the fiscal year for which the audit was made.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
343 of 932

7. Planning Projects
In carrying out planning projects:
a. It will execute the project in accordance with the approved program narrative contained in the project application or with modifications similarly approved. b. It will furnish the Secretary with such periodic reports as required pertaining to the planning project and planning work activities.
c. It will include in all published material prepared in connection with the planning project a notice that the material was prepared under a grant provided by the United States. d. It will make such material available for examination by the public, and agrees that no material prepared with funds under this project shall be subject to copyright in the United States or any other country.
e. It will give the Secretary unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use any of the material prepared in connection with this grant. f. It will grant the Secretary the right to disapprove the Sponsor’s employment of specific consultants and their subcontractors to do all or any part of this project as well as the right to disapprove the proposed scope and cost of professional services. g. It will grant the Secretary the right to disapprove the use of the Sponsor’s employees to do all or any part of the project.
h. It understands and agrees that the Secretary’s approval of this project grant or the Secretary’s approval of any planning material developed as part of this grant does not mean constitute or imply any assurance or commitment on the part of the Secretary to approve any pending or future application for a Federal airport grant.

8. Reports and Inspections.

It will submit to the Secretary such annual or special financial and operations reports as the Secretary may reasonably request.

9. Civil Rights.

It will promptly take any measures necessary to ensure that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, and national origin (including limited English proficiency) in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-4; creed and sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity) per 49 U.S.C. § 47123 and related requirements; age per the Age Discrimination Act of 1975 and related requirements; or disability per the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and related requirements, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in any program and activity conducted with, or benefiting from, funds received from this grant.
a. Using the definitions of activity, facility, and program as found and defined in 49 CFR §§

The sponsor agrees that it is obligated to this assurance for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the form of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the assurance obligates the sponsor, or any transferee for the longer of the following periods:

1. So long as the airport is used as an airport, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or

2. So long as the sponsor retains ownership or possession of the property. d. Required Solicitation Language.

It will include the following notification in all solicitations for bids, Requests For Proposals for work, or material under this grant agreement and in all proposals for agreements, including airport concessions, regardless of funding source:
“The (City of Redlands), in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders or offerors that it will affirmatively ensure that for any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, [select businesses, or disadvantaged business enterprises or airport concession disadvantaged business enterprises] will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and no businesses will be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency), creed, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), age, or disability in consideration for an award.”
e. R
equired Contract Provisions.

1. It will insert the non-discrimination contract clauses requiring compliance with the acts and regulations relative to non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the DOT, and incorporating the acts and regulations into the contracts by reference in every contract or agreement subject to the non-discrimination in Federally-assisted programs of the DOT acts and regulations.

2. It will include a list of the pertinent non-discrimination authorities in every contract that is subject to the non-discrimination acts and regulations.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
345 of 932

4. It will insert non-discrimination contract clauses prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin (including limited English proficiency), creed, sex (including sexual orientation and gender identity), age, or disability as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, license, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the sponsor with other parties:
a. For the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program; and
b. For the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, project, or program. f. It will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub-recipients, sub-grantees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the acts, the regulations, and this assurance. g. It agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the acts, the regulations, and this assurance.

10. Engineering and Design Services.

If any phase of such project has received Federal funds under Chapter 471 subchapter 1 of Title 49 U.S.C., it will award each contract, or sub-contract for program management, construction management, planning studies, feasibility studies, architectural services, preliminary engineering, design, engineering, surveying, mapping or related services in the same manner as a contract for architectural and engineering services is negotiated under Chapter 11 of Title 40 U S.C., or an equivalent qualifications-based requirement prescribed for or by the sponsor of the airport.

11. Foreign Market Restrictions.

12. Policies, Standards, and Specifications.

It will carry out the project in accordance with policies, standards, and specifications approved by the Secretary.

13. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises.

The recipient shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, or sex in the award and performance of any DOT-assisted contract covered by 49 CFR Part 26. The recipient shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Part 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT-assisted contracts. The recipient’s DBE program, as required by 49 CFR Part 26, and as approved by DOT, is incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of these programs is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the recipient of its failure to carry out its approved program, the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under Part 26 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 (31 U.S.C. §§ 3801-3809, 3812).

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
346 of 932

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
347 of 932
1 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm

AGREEMENT TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

This agreement for the provision of airport planning services (“Agreement”) is made and entered in this 17th day of January 2023 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Redlands, a mun icipal corporation (“City”) and Coffman Associates, Inc. , a Missouri corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as a “Party” and, together, as the “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Consultant agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1 – ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT

1.1 City hereby engages Consultant to provide professional airport planning services for City (the “Services”).

1.2 The Services shall be performed by Consultant in a professional manner, an d Consultant represents that it h as the skill and the professional expertise necessary to provide the Services to City at a level of competency presently maintained by other practicing professional consultants in the industry providing like and similar types of Services.

ARTICLE 2 – SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

2.1 The Servi ces that Consultant shall perform are more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” titled “Scope of Servi ces,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

2.2 Consultant shall comply with applicable federal , state and local laws and regulati ons in the performance of this A greement including, but not limited to , any applicable State prevailing wage laws.

ARTICLE 3 – RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY

3.1 City designates Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager , as City’s rep resentative with respect to performance of the Services, and such person shall have the authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City’s policies and decisions with respect to performance of the Services.

ARTICLE 4 – PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES

4.1 Consultant shall perform and complete the Services in a prompt and diligent manner

The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of [ two] (2) years commencing as of the Effective Date, unless terminated earlier as provided herein. .

4.2 If Consultant’s Services include deliverable electronic visual presentation materials, such materials shall be delivered in a form, and made available to Cit y, consistent with City Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
348 of 932
2 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm Council-adopted policy for the same . It shall be the obligation of Consultant t o obtain a copy of such policy from City staff.

ARTICLE 5 – PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT

Compensation: Total compensation for Consultant’s performance of the Services shall be in the amount of [Ninety Eight Thousand Six Hundred Fifty dollars] ($98,650). City shall pay Consultant in accordance with Exhibit “C ,” titled “Fee Schedule Title” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference..

5.1 Consultant s hall submit mont hly invoices to C ity describ ing the Services performed during the preceding month. Consultant’s invoices shall include a brief description of the Services performed, the dates the Services were performed, the number of hours spent and by wh om, and a descri ption of reimburs able expenses related to the Services. City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty (30) days after receipt and approval by City of Consultant’s invoice.

5.3 Any n otice or other communication required, or which may be gi ven, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in writing. Any such notice shall be deemed delivered (i) on the date of delivery in person; (ii) five (5) days after deposit in first class registered mail, with return receipt requested; (iii) on the actual deliv ery date if depo sited with an ove rnight courier; or (iv) on the date sent by facsimile or electronic mail transmission (including PDF), if confirmed with a copy sent contemporaneously by first class, certified, registered or express mail; in each case prop erly posted and fully prepaid to the appropriate address set forth below, or such other address as a Party may provide notice in accordance with this section:

CITY: CONSULTANT:

City Clerk Dave Fitz, Chief Executive Officer
City of Redlands Coffman Associates, Inc.
35 Cajon Street 12920 Metcalf Avenue, Suite 200
P.O. Box 3005 (mailing) Overland Park, KS 66213
Redlands, CA 92373 [email protected]
[email protected] Phone: (816) 524-3500
Phone: (909) 798-7531 Fax: (816) 524-2575

ARTICLE 6 – INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

6.1 The following insurance coverage required by this Agreement shall b e maintained by Consultant for the duration of its performance of the Services. Consultant shall not perform any Services unless and until the required insurance li sted below is obtained by Consultant. Consultant shall provide City with certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing such insurance prior to commencement of the Services. Insurance policies shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation or mo dification of t he policy except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
349 of 932
3 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm A. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability insurance in the amount that meets statutory requirements with an insurance carrier acceptable to City, or certification to City that C onsultant is self -insured or exempt from the workers’ compensation laws of the State of California. Consultant shall execute and provide City with Exhibit “ C ,” titled “Workers’ Compensation Insurance Certification,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, prior to performance of the Services.

B. Comprehensive General L iability insurance with carriers acceptable to City in the minimum amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,0 00,000) agg regate, for public liability, property damage and personal injury is required. Ci ty shall be name d as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non -contributing to any insurance or self -insurance maintained by City.

C. Consultant shall s ecure and maintain professional liability insurance throughout the term of this A greement in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim made.

D. Business Auto L iability coverage, with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occur rence, combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liabilit y. This coverage shall include all Consultant owned vehicles used in connection with Consultant’s provision of the Services, hired and non -owned vehicles, and employee non-ownership vehicles. City shall be named as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non-contributing to any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City.

E. Consultant is expressly prohibited from assigning or subcontracting a ny of the Services without the prior written consent of City. In the event of mutual agreem ent by the Parties to assign or subcontract a portion of the Services, Consultant shall add such assignee or subcontractor as an additional insured to the insuranc e policies required hereby and provide City with the insurance endorsements prior to any Services being performed by the assignee or subcontractor.

6.2 Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officials, employees and age nts from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, including attorneys’ fees, arising from injury or death to persons or damage to property occasioned by any negligent act or omission by, or the willful misconduct of, Consultant, or its officers, employees and agents in performing the Services.

ARTICLE 7 – CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

7.1 Consultant covenants and represents that it does not have any investment or interest in any real property that may be the subject of this Agreement or any ot her source of income, interest in real property or investment that would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s Services. Consultant further covenants and Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
350 of 932
4 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder, no person having any such interest shall perform any Services under this Agreement.

7.2 Consultant agree s it is not a de signated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:

A. Does not make a governmental decision whether to:

(i) approve a rate, rule or regulation, or adopt or enforce a City law; (ii) issue, deny, suspend or revoke a ny City permit, license, application, certification, approval, order or similar authorization or entitlement; (iii) authorize City to enter into, modify or renew a contract; (iv) grant City approval to a contract that requires City approval and to which City is a party, or to the specifications for such a contract; (v) grant City approval to a plan, design, report, study or similar item; (vi) adopt, or grant City approval of, policies, standards or guidelines for City or for any subdivision thereof.

B. Does not serve in a staff capacity with City and in that capacity, participate in making a governmental decision or otherwise perform the same or s ubstantially the same duties for City that would otherwise be performed by an individual holding a position specified in City’s Conflict of Interest Code under Government Code section 87302.

7.3 In the event City determines that Consultant must disclose its f inancial in terests, Consultant shall complete and file a Fair Political Practices Commission Form 700, Statement of Economic Interests , with the City Clerk’s office pursuant to the written instructions provided by the City Clerk.

ARTICLE 8 – GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

8.1 In t he event any action is commenced to enforce or interpret any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement the prevailing Party shall, in addition to any costs and other relief, be entitled to the recovery of its reasonable attorneys’ fees, i ncluding fees for the use of in-house counsel by a Party.

8.2 Consultant shall not assign any o f the Services, except with the prior written approval of City and in s trict compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Any assignment or attempted assignment without such prior written consent may, in the sole discretion of City, result in City’s immediate termination of this Agreement.

8.3 Consultant is for all purposes under this Agreement an independent contractor and shall perform the Services as a n independent contractor. Neither City nor any its agents shall have control over the conduc t of Consultant or Consultant’s employees, except as herein set forth. Consultant shall supply all necessary tools and instrumentalities required to perform the Ser vices. Assi gned personnel employed by Consultant are for its account Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
351 of 932
5 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm only, and in no event shall Consultant or personnel retained by it be deemed to have been employed by City or engaged by City for the account of, or on behalf of City. Consultant shall ha ve no autho rity, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent, nor sh all Consultant have any authority, express or implied, to bind City to any obligation.

8.4 This Agreement may be terminated by City, in its sole discre tion, by pr oviding not less than five (5) days prior written notice to Consultant of City’s intent to terminate. If this Agreement is terminated by City, an adjustment to Consultant’s compensation shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anti cipated profit or unperformed Services, and (2) any payment du e Consultant at the time of te rmination may be adjusted to the extent of any additional costs to City occasioned by any default by Consultant. Upon receipt of a termination notice, Consultant shall immediately discontinue its provision of the Services and, within five (5) days of the date of the term ination notice, deliver or otherwise make available to City, copies (in both hard copy and electronic form, where applicable) of project related dat a, design c alculations, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such oth er information a nd materials as may have been accumulated by Consultant in performing the Services. Consultant shall be compensated on a pro-rata basis for Services completed up to the date of termination.

8.5 Consultant shall maintain books, ledgers, invoices, accounts and other records and documents evidencing costs and expenses related to the Services for a period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, fr om t he date of final payment to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Such books shall be available at reasonable times for examination by City at the office of Consultant.

8.6 This Agreement, including the Exhibits incorporated herein by referenc e, represents the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties as to the matters c ontained herein, and any prior negotiations, written proposals or verbal agreements relating to such matters are superseded by this Agreement. Except as otherwise p rovided for herein, any amendment to this Agreement shall be in writing, approved by City an d signed by City and Consultant.

8.7 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California , without regard to its co nflicts of laws provisions. The Parties agree that all actions or proceedings arising in con nection with thi s Agreement shall be tried and litigated only in the state courts located in San Bernardino County, California, and the federal courts located in Riverside County, California.

8.8 If one or more of the sentences, clauses, paragraphs or section s contained in t his Agreement is declared invalid, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder of this Ag reement and shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining sentences, claus es, paragraphs o r sections contained herein, unless to do so would deprive a Party of a material benefit of its bargain under this Agreement.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
352 of 932
6 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of City and Consultant have signed in confirmation of this Agreement.

CITY OF REDLANDS Coffman Associates, Inc.

By: ___________________________ By: _________________________ Eddie Tejeda, Mayor Dave Fitz, Chief Executive Officer

ATTEST:

___________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
353 of 932
7 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm EXHI
BIT A

SCOPE OF

SERVICES

GENERAL PROJECT DESCRIPTION
In order to reduce the potential of wildlife strikes with aircraft, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5200‐38, Protocol for the Conduct and Revie w of Wildlife Hazard Site Visits, Wildlife Hazard Assessments, and Wildlife Hazard Management Plans , which provides guidance to public use airports about certain land uses that potentially attract hazardous wildlife.

The purpose of this scope of work is t o develop a plan to minimize the potential of wildlife strikes with aircraft at Redlands Municipal Airport (the Airport). This Scope of Services is presented in two phases, or steps. The first step in addressing wildlife concerns is to conduct a Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA) for the Airport. The WHA, conducted by a Qualified Airport Wildlife Biologist (QAWB), provides the scientific basis for the development, implementation, and refinement of the second step, which is the preparation of the Wildlife Hazard Management Plan (WHMP). The preparation of a WHA is presented in Element 1, and the preparation of the WHMP is presented in Element 2.

ELEMENT 1 ‐ PREPARATION OF A WILDLIFE HAZARD ASSESSMENT Task 1.1 ‐ Kick‐Off Meeting and Initial Site Assessment

An Initial Assessment meeting is to be conducted with airport staff immediately following execution of a contract. The focus of the meeting will be to discuss airp ort management activities, and past wildlife incursions. After the meeting, biologists will tour the airport and surrounding areas to evaluate wildlife attractants on the airport and a five‐mile buffer around the approach/departure airspace. High‐ resoluti on aerial pho tography will be utilized to facilitate the attractant review. During the site assessment, WHA survey points will be established based on the locations of identified attractants and airport operations. Once the survey points are identified, the first round of wildlife surveys, will be completed and finalize the methods specific to the WHA.

The WHA QAWB may need to obtain an Airport Operations Area (AOA) Access Badge to attain driving clearance on the AOA. As part of the initial site visit, it is assumed th at arrangements will be made for airport access, driving clearance on airport property, and escorts for any movement areas until the airport wildlife biologist has received the necessary security authorization and airfield driving/familiarity training at the Airport.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
354 of 932
8 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm

If Covid‐19 safety protocols preclude airport staff from meeting in‐person to conduct the initial assessment meeting, the meeting will be conducted remotely over Zoom. Conducting the meeting remotely will not eliminate the need to tour the airport and conduct the initial survey. The biologist will conduct the initial site survey following the meeting as discussed above. Provided the biologist is granted permission to drive in the AOA, all surveys can be conducted in absence of airport staff.

Responsibilities:

Consultant: The project team will review existing information on wildlife hazard issues, attend the kick‐off meeting, take necessary secur ity training, conduct a site visit, collect necessary data, and select survey points.

Sponsor: Provide Consultant with necessary security training, airport tour, airport access, data, and provide kick‐off meeting location.

Product: Initial Assessment and kick‐off meeting.

Task 1.2 ‐ Identification of Attractants

Wildlife are attracted to areas that provide food, water, and shelte r. This task will use high‐resolution aerial photography to help identify wildlife attractants, identify attractants within the AOA, and within a five‐mile buffer around the approach/departure airspace, as recommended by the FAA. Furthermore, this task will identify existing land uses or proposed land uses that are incompatible with safe airport operations, a s stated in AC 150/5200‐33C, within 10,000 feet of the airport and within the five‐mile buffer.

Responsibilities:

Consultant: Identify wildlife attra ctants on the Airport, within 10,000 feet of the Airport, and within the five‐mile buffer using aerial photography and investigating hazardous attractants and incompatible land uses to explain wildlife movements.

Sponsor: Review.

Product: Wildlife attractants analysis.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
355 of 932
9 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm

Task 1.3 ‐ Wildlife Hazard Assessment Methods

A QAWB will implement survey methods pursuant to 14 CFR 139.337(c) and AC 150/5200‐38. The QAWB will collect data to address the following components in the WHA:
1) analysis of events or circumstances prompting the WHA; 2) identification of attractants; 3) wildlife surveys; 4) description of hazards to air carrier operations; and 5) recommend actions for reducing identified wildlife hazards.

To analyze the events that triggered the WHA, data from the FAA Wildlife Strike Data Base, the previous WHA, the current WHMP, and other airport records (if available) will be reviewed. The records review will focus on identifying trends in incident circumstances, past observations, and current management actions. Utilizing field surveys, aerial ima gery, and AC 150/5200‐33C as guides, wildlife attractants will be identified on and around the airport.

Existing land uses in perimeters A, B, and C that are incompatible with safe airport operations will be ide ntified. Identification of wildlife attractan ts will begin during the initial site visit and will continue throughout the survey period.

As recommended by the FAA, wildlife surveys will be conducted at the airport at least two times a month for 12 consecutive months. Each survey will consist of observing all on‐airport points at varying times of day. Off‐airport points will be surveyed at least quarterly. The survey schedule will focus on capturing wildlife movements in the morning, afternoon, and evening hours. This will allow the surveyor to assess the potential wildlife hazards in varying conditions throughout the seasons. As recommended by FAA, modified point‐counts for all wildlife, but especially birds, will be conducted during each survey. The biologist will survey each of the predetermined survey points for three to five minutes to identify wildlife use within the area. Modified point‐count data forms will be completed with an emphasis on observed activity (e.g., flight height above ground level, direction from observer, number of runway crossings, relation to aircraft movement areas, etc.). The biologist will also collect data on general observations as they travel between survey points. General observations may include large mammal tracking surveys, small mammal burrow surveys, notable avi an or large mammal movements, or facilities inspections.

In addition to the point‐count surveys, spotlight surveys will be conducted and camera stations will be established periodically throughout the year to determine nocturnal animal activity on the air port property. If evidence of small mammal use of the airfield is observed, small mammal trapping (up to 100 adjusted trap nights) will be conducted to evaluate the prey base for larger birds and mammals on the airport property. The small mammal trapping surveys will utilize Sherman live traps. Our proposed survey methodology will allow us to identify wildlife species, numbers, location, movements, and daily and seasonal occurrences at the Airport. All survey data will be processed in a digital database for easy query and analysis. If requested, the database can be provided to the airport for future use.

Responsibilities:

Consultant: Conduct monthly wildlife and bird surveys for 12 consecutive months to Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
356 of 932
10 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm include nighttime spotlight surveys and appropriate small mammal trapping.

Sponsor: Provide Consultant with airport access as needed.

Product: Appropriate wildlife and bird surveys.

Task 1.4 ‐ Wildlife Hazard Assessment Reporting

An Initial Assessment Report, three Quarterly Survey Updates, and a WHA Report will be provided. It is assumed that the Initial Assessment will be subject to two rounds of review and the WHA report will be subject to three rounds of review. The quarterly reports will consist of brief memos. All reports will be emailed for review. Comments will be addressed immediately following receipt of the comments.

An Initial Assessment Report will be written after the in itial site assessment meeting and survey; the report will include the reason for the WHA, a brief description of the preliminary observations at the airport, and established survey methods and schedule.

Three quarterly reports with be prepared during the s urvey period. Each quarterly report will update airport staff on the survey efforts and findings conducted during the previous three months.

Once all surveys are complete, the data analyzed and prepare a WHA report. The report will evaluate the events that triggered the WHA by describing the airport and summarizing the strike data. The results of the surveys will include an identification of wildlife species observed by their numbers, locations, local movements, and daily and seasonal occurrences in the study area. Attractants on and near the airport will be identified. The WHA Report will describe the identified wildlife hazards to air carrier operations and recommend actions for reducing these wildlife hazards. If federally listed wildlife species are obse rved, the potential ramifications associated with managing the Federal Endangered Species Act listed species will be assessed.

The draft WHA Report will be prepared and disseminated to airport staff for review and comment. Comments on the draft WHA Report will be incorporated and a final WHA will be prepared, which will be ready for the airport’s submittal to the FAA for approval.

Responsibilities:

Consultant: Prepare Draft and Final WHA Reports.

Sponsor: Review and provide comments.

Product: One (1) hard copy and one (1) electronic copy of the Initial Assessment Report; electronic copies of three quarterly survey reports; and a WHA Report one (1) electronic copy of the Draft WHA Report, and three (3) hard copies and two Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
357 of 932
11 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm (2) CDs or USB flash drives of the Final WHA Report.

ELEMENT 2 ‐ PREPARATION OF A WILDLIFE HAZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN

The following tasks will result in the preparation of a plan to address the hazardous wildlife situations described within the Wildlife Hazard Assessment (WHA) for the Airp ort. For the purposes of this scope of work, preparation of a full Wildlife Hazard M anagement Plan (WHMP), in accordance with the requirements of 14 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) 139.337, was assumed. Should a lesser effort be required, a revision to th is scope of work will be needed.

Task 2.1 ‐ Overview of Wildlife Hazards

Using the WHA, an overview of wildlife hazards at the Airport will be prepared. The history of wildlife strikes at the Airport will be documented as well as the locations of specific wildlife hazards.

Responsibilities:

Consultant: Prepare Overview of Wildlife Hazards.

Sponsor: Review and provide comments.

Product: Overview of Wildlife Hazards.

Task 2.2 ‐ Overview of Wildlife Management Techniques

A primer regarding airport wildlife management will be prepared w ith the purpose of informing users, readers, and reviewers regarding possible techniques that could be implemented at the airport. A sum mary of non‐lethal and lethal techniques will be included.

Descriptions of communication techniques and potential patrols will also be included.

Responsibilities:

Consultant: Prepare Overview of Wildlife Management Techniques.

Sponsor: Review and provide comments.

Product: Overview of Wildlife Management Techniques.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
358 of 932
12 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm Task 2.3 ‐ Wildlife Management Techniques to be Implemented at the Airport

A series of wildlife management techniques will be planned for implementation at the airport.

A system for field monitoring and reporting will be formulated, best management practices will be used, and an annual work plan will be fo rmulated and documented. Due to the unforeseen nature of specific agency requirements, the pursuit of local, state, and federal wildlife control permits is not included in the Scope of Services.

Responsibilities:

Consultant: Prepare Wildlife Management Techniques to be implemented.

Sponsor: Review and provide comments.

Product: Wildlife Management Techniques to be implemented.

Task 2.4 ‐ Implementation and Evaluation

The manner in which the WHMP will be implemented and evaluated will be documented. A list of supplies and required training will also be outlined.

Responsibilities:

Consultant: Prepare a list of supplies and required training.

Sponsor: Review and provide comments.

Product: A list of supplies and required training.

Task 2.5 ‐ Draft WHMP Document Preparation

Materials prepared during Tasks 2.1 through 2.4 will be utilized to compile the Draft WHMP document. The document will be compiled in a manner which will allow it to be a living document that is regularly used an d implemented by as signed staff. Checklists, which can easily be duplicated, will be included in the document to allow for document review, implementation, and supply logs. The following sections will be provided in the document:
• A list of the individuals having authority and responsibility for implementing each Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
359 of 932
13 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm aspect of the plan.
• A list prioritizing the following actions identified in the wildlife hazard assessment and target dates for their initiation and completion.
• Requirements for and, where applicable, copies of local, State, and Federal wildlife control permits.
• Identification of resources that the certificate holder will provide to implement the plan.
• Procedures to be followed during air carrier operations. • Procedures to review and evaluate the wildlife hazard management plan every 12 months.
• A training program conducted by a QAWB.

One (1) electronic copy of the draft WHMP in PDF format will be prepared for review by the Sponsor and FAA.

Responsibilities:

Consultant: Prepare Draft WHMP document.

Sponsor: Review and provide comments.

Product: A Draft WHMP document in PDF format.

Task 2.6 ‐ Final WHMP Document Preparation

Following review of the Draft WHMP by the FAA and Sponsor, the final WHMP documen t will be prepared. After incorporating comments, three (3) hard copies and two (2) CDs or USB flash drives of the document will be prepared for the Sponsor and FAA.

Responsibilities:

Consultant: Prepare Final
WHMP document. Sponsor:

Review and provide
comments. Product: A Final
WHMP document.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
360 of 932
14 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm Task 2.7 ‐ Coordination Meetings/Conference Calls

It is anticipated that coordination me etings will be required during the preparation of the WHMP to coordinate with the Sponsor and FAA. These meetings could occur in‐person or via conference call and/or video conference. These meetings/coordination calls are tentatively planned during the pre paration of Task 2.3 and after Task 2.5 to review the Draft WHMP Document. It is assumed that one
(1) in‐person meeting will occur as part of this task.

Responsibilities:

Consultant: Prepare meeting materials and attend meetings (one [1] in‐person meeting).

Sponsor: Provide meeting location and attend meetings.

Product: Coordination meetings held at key decision intervals. One (1) in‐person meeting is assumed.

Task 2.8 (Optional) ‐ Wildlife Hazard Management Training

Upon completion of the WHMP, t he project team can support the Airport in the implementation of the WHMP by conducting an initial wildlife hazard management training course for applicable personnel. The QAWB can develop and implement a one‐day training program. Development includes preparation, review, and inclusion of the WHA and WHMP into the core curriculum and implementing a student‐ focused training program based on adult learning theory and ins tructional systems. The training curriculum will be based on and meet the FAA standar ds p rovided in AC 150/5200‐36B. The WHMP training would be conducted via Zoom or a similar remote conferencing platform.

Responsibilities:

Consultant: An initial training program will be made available to satisfy the training requirements for the FAA.

Sponsor: Attend training program.

Product: An FAA‐approved training program.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
361 of 932
15 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm EXHIBIT "B"
Fee Schedule – Coffman and Associates

January 2022
Coffman Associates ‐ Person Hours

ELEMENT/TASK
TOTAL

Principal
$290
Senior
Professional
$256

Technical
$112

Total
Labor

Expenses
Coffman Associates
ELEMENT 1 ‐ PREPARATION OF A WILDLIFE HAZARD ASSESSMENT Task 1.1 Kick‐Off Meeting and Initial Site Assessment 0 4 0 $1,024 $0 $1,024 Task 1.2 Identification of Attractants 0 8 8 $2,944 $0 $2,944 Task 1.3 Wildlife Hazard Assessment Methods 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 Task 1.4 Wildlife Hazard Assessment Reporting 2 4 0 $1,604 $0 $1,604 ELEMENT 2 ‐ PREPARATION OF A WILDLIFE HAZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN Task 2.1 Overview of Wildlife Hazards 0 4 0 $1,024 $0 $1,024 Task 2.2 Overview of Wildlife Management Techniques 0 4 0 $1,024 $0 $1,024 Task 2.3 Wildlife Management Techniques to be Implemented at Airport 0 16 0 $4,096 $0 $4,096 Task 2.4 Implementation and Evaluation 0 4 0 $1,024 $0 $1,024 Task 2.5 Draft WHMP Document Preparation (Electronic Copy) 2 12 4 $4,100 $0 $4,100 Task 2.6 Final WHMP Document Preparation (3 Hard Copies and 2 Flash Drives) 2 4 4 $2,052 $0 $2,052 Task 2.7 Coordination Meetings/Conference Calls (1 In‐Person Meeting) 8 8 0 $4,368 $1,500 $5,868 Task 2.8 Wildlife Hazard Management Training (Optional) 0 0 0 $0 $0 $0 COFFMAN ASSOCIATES PROJECT TOTAL 14 68 16 $23,260 $1,500 $24,760 SWCA Environmental Consultants
ELEMENT 1 ‐ PREPARATION OF A WILDLIFE HAZARD ASSESSMENT Task 1.1 Kick‐Off Meeting and Initial Site Assessment $0 Task 1.2 Identification of Attractants $0
Task 1.3 Wildlife Hazard Assessment Methods (Includes Kick‐Off Meeting and Initial Site Assessment ) $53,441 Task 1.4 Wildlife Hazard Assessment Reporting (Up to 5 Hard Copies and 3 Flash Drives) $15,735 ELEMENT 2 ‐ PREPARATION OF A WILDLIFE HAZARD MANAGEMENT PLAN Task 2.1 Overview of Wildlife Hazards $0
Task 2.2 Overview of Wildlife Management Techniques $0
Task 2.3 Wildlife Management Techniques to be Implemented at Airport $0 Task 2.4 Implementation and Evaluation $0
Task 2.5 Draft WHMP Document Preparation $1,368
Task 2.6 Final WHMP Document Preparation $0
Task 2.7 Coordination Meetings/Conference Calls $0
Task 2.8 Wildlife Hazard Management Training (Optional) $3,346 SWCA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT TOTAL $73,890
PROJECT TOTAL $98,650
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
362 of 932
16 I:\cmo\Agreements\Coffman Wildlife Hazard Assesment-FY22-0098.doc-jm EXHIBIT "C "

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION

Every employer, except the State, shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways:

(a) By being insur ed against liabi lity to pay compensation by one or more insurer s duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this State. (b) By securing from the Director o f Industrial Relations, a certificate of consent to self-insure, either as an individual employe r, or as one emp loyer in a group of employers, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self -insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees.

CHECK ONE

_____I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability fo r Workers’ Compensation or to u ndertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with s uch provisions before commencing the performance of the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement. (Labor Code §1861).

_____I affirm that at all times, in performing the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement, I shall not emp loy any person in any manner such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California. However, at any time, if I employ any p erson such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California, immediately I shall provide th e City with a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certification of workers’ compensation insurance.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information and representations made in this certificate are true and correct.

VENDOR

By: Date: ___________________
Name, Title

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
363 of 932

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO AGREEMENT TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

This first amendment (“First Amendment”) to the A greement To Perform Professional Services – Provision of Airport Planning Services (“Agreement”), dated January 17th, 2023, by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation and a general law city ( “City”), and Coffman Associates, Inc. (“Consultant”), is made and entered into this 18th day of November 2025.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and Consultant to amend their existing Agreement, specifically to extend the term of the agreement to align with the FAA grant which is funding the project.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration in the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged City and Consultant agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

Section 1. Section 4.2 of Article 4 (“Performance of Services”) of the Agreement, entitled is hereby amended to read as follows:

“4.1 The Consultant shall perform and complete the s ervices in a prompt and diligent manner commencing as of the Effective Date of this Agreement and expiring on August 30, 2026, concurrent with the FAA Grant to which the project relates, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions set forth therein.”

Section 2. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged by this First Amendment and in effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment, to be effective as of November 18, 2025.

CITY OF REDLANDS

________________________________ By: ________________________________ Mario Saucedo, Mayor Dave Fitz, Chief Executive Officer

ATTEST:

__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
364 of 932
City Council Meeting I. 7.

DATE: 11/18/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve Second Amendment to the Agreement with Community Works Design Group, LLC extending the agreement to December 31, 2026, to complete the design of a BMX Pump Track (Facilities and Community Services Director Crocker)
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Community Works Design Group, LLC.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with Community Works Design Group, LLC for the provision of design services of a BMX Pump Track.

DISCUSSION:

On January 6, 2024, the City entered into an agreement with Community Works Design Group, LLC (CWDG) to provide design services for a BMX Pump Track at Sylvan Park. This project, recommended and supported by the Parks and Recreation Commission, aims to supplement and enhance the existing skate park facilities at Sylvan Park. The proposed second amendment seeks to extend the term of the design agreement to December 31, 2026, allowing CWDG to finalize the project and prepare plans and specifications for bidding. Importantly, this extension does not include any additional costs. The additional time added to the project will ensure that both the City and CWDG can work diligently to ensure ADA path of travel from the parking lot and restrooms to the pump track.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
365 of 932
ALTERNATIVES:

City Council may choose not to approve the amendment and provide staff alternative direction.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

N/A
SUBMITTED BY:

Tabitha Crocker, Facilities and Community Services Department Director RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Christopher Boatman, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Salomon Abdel-Aziz, Management Analyst
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2025/26
Revenue Generating: N
Appropriation Required Y/N: N
Amount: $0.00
Budgeted Y/N: N/A
Account No.: N/A
Discussion:

No additional cost associated with this amendment.

Attachments

1. Original Agreement

2. First Amendment

3. Second Amendment
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
366 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
367 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
368 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
369 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
370 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
371 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
372 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
373 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
374 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
375 of 932
1 I:\cmo\Agreements\First Amendment Community Works Design Group, LLC FY24-0052.docx-ms

FIRST AMENDMENT

TO AGREEMENT TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

This first amendment (“First Amendment”) to the agreement for the provision of design services (“Agreement”), dated February 6 , 202 4, by and between the City of Redl ands, a municipal corporation and a general law city (“City”), and Community Works Design Group, LLC a California limited liability company (“Consultant”) , is made and entered into this 19th day of November, 2024.

RECITALS

WHEREAS, it is the desire of the City and Consultant to amend their existing Agreement, specifically to add additional time to the agreement to allow for the completion of the project as the project has progressed at a slower pace than initially anticipated at not fault of either party.

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration in the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged City and Contractor agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

Section 1. Section 4.2 of Article 4 (“Performance of Services”) of the Agreement, entitled is hereby amended to read as follows:

“4.2 Consultant shall complete the Services by June 30, 2025, unless the Services are terminated earlier as provided for herein.

Section 2. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged by this First Amendment and in effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment, to be effective as of November 19, 2024.

CITY OF REDLANDS COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN GROUP, LLC

By: _________________________ By: _______________________ Eddie Tejeda, Mayor Scott Rice, President

ATTEST:

__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
376 of 932
I:\cmo\Agreements\Community Works Design Group-FY2526-074.docx-jl

SECOND AMENDMENT

TO AGREEMENT TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

This second amendment (“ Second Amendment”) to the agreement for the provision of design services (“Agreement”), dated February 6, 2024, by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation and a general law city (“City”), and Community Works Design Group, LLC a California limit ed liability company (“Consultant”), is made and entered into this 18th day of November, 2025.

RECITALS

NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration in the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged City and Contractor agree as follows:

AGREEMENT

Section 1. Section 4.2 of Article 4 (“Performance of Services”) of the Agreement, entitled is hereby amended to read as follows:

“4.2 Consultant shall complete the Services by December 31, 2026, unless the Services are terminated earlier as provided for herein.”

Section 2. All other provisions of the Agreement shall remain unchanged by this First Amendment and in effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment, to be effective as of November 18, 2025.

CITY OF REDLANDS COMMUNITY WORKS DESIGN GROUP, LLC

By: By:

Mario Saucedo, Mayor Scott Rice, President

ATTEST:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
377 of 932
City Council Meeting I. 8.

DATE: 11/18/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve a Professional Services Agreement with Geo-Logic Associates, Inc. for Landfill Hydrogeologic Support at the California Street Landfill for a total amount not-to-exceed $150,000 and determine that approval of this agreement is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Facilities and Community Services Director Crocker)
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

I move that City Council determine that approval of this agreement is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; and

1. I move to approve a Professional Services Agreement with Geo-Logic Associates, Inc., for Landfill Hydrogeologic Support at the California Street Landfill for an amount not-to-exceed $150,000 for a period of three years.

2. RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends City Council approve a Professional Services Agreement with Geo-Logic Associates, Inc., for Landfill Hydrogeologic Support at the California Street Landfill in an amount not-to-exceed $150,000 for a period of three years.

In addition, staff recommends that approval of this agreement is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
378 of 932
DISCUSSION:

The Facilities and Community Services Department, Solid Waste Division, operates a landfill located on Nevada Street, adjacent to the Santa Ana River wash. The landfill is utilized exclusively for refuse collected within the city limits and is not open to the public. The landfill is regulated by a variety of state entities that permit and monitor the daily operations of the site. The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) requires annual water quality monitoring and reporting, which is facilitated by outside contractual service. The proposed consultant will play a lead role in assuring compliance with all water quality regulations pertaining to the City’s operation and operating permit for the landfill.

City staff issued a request for proposal (RFP) in accordance with the City’s procurement policy. A total of one firm responded.

Firm Name Responsive
Proposer
Responsible
Proposer
Geo-Logic
Associates, Inc.

X X
Geo-Logic Associates, Inc., is deemed to be the most qualified firm based on their demonstrated competence and qualifications necessary for the satisfactory performance of the services required, and the cost of such services. Geo-Logic Associates, Inc., will provide professional consulting services for sampling, data validations, database management, performance monitoring, hydrogeologic support, technical and statistical analysis, and reporting services. Additional tasks may also include more technical services for the City's California Street Landfill for the next three years.

Staff rated the proposal and is recommending that City Council approve the agreement with Geo-Logic Associates, Inc., in a total amount not-to-exceed one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) for a total of three years.

The proposed action is exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act’s (CEQA) guidelines pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) as the approval of the agreement would be covered by the general rule common sense exemption that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment, where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment and there is negligible expansion of existing facilities.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
379 of 932
ALTERNATIVES:

City Council may elect not to approve the agreement and provide alternative direction to staff.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Supports Priority D - Sustainability.

SUBMITTED BY:

Tabitha Crocker, Facilities and Community Services Department Director RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Christopher Boatman, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
Dana Abramovitz-Daniel, Procurement Manager
PREPARED BY:

Nathalie Ayala, Senior Administrative Assistant
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2025-26
Revenue Generating: No
Appropriation Required Y/N: N
Amount: $ 150,000
Budgeted Y/N: Y
Account No.: 511900
Discussion:

Sufficient funding for the purchase order is included in the Solid Waste Division’s (511900) budget for Fiscal Year 2025-26 as approved by City Council.

Attachments
A. Agreement with Geo-Logic Associates
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
380 of 932

AGREEMENT TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

This agreement for the provision of hydrogeologic consulting services associated with the California Street Landfill (“Agreement”) is mad e and entered in this 18 th day of November, 2025 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation (“City ”) and Geo-Logic Associates, Inc. , a California corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as a “Party” and, together, as the “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Consultant agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1 – ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT

1.1 City hereby engages Consultant to provide regulatory reporting and hydrogeologic support for the California Street Landfill services for City (the “Services”).

1.2 The Services shall be performed by Consultant in a professional manner, and Consultant represents that it has the skill and the professional expertise necessary to provide the Services to City at a level of competency presently maintained by other practicing professional consultants in the industry providing like and similar types of Services.

ARTICLE 2 – SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

2.2 Consultant shall comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulati ons in the performance of this A greement including, but not limited to, any applicable State prevailing wage laws.

ARTICLE 3 – RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY

3.1 City designates Tabitha Crocker , Facilities and Community Services Director, as City’s representative with respect to performance of the Services, and such person shall have the authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City’s policies and decisions with respect to performance of the Services.

ARTICLE 4 – PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES

4.1 Consultant shall perform and complete the Services in a prompt and diligent manner in accordance with the schedule set forth in Exhibit “B,” titled “Project Schedule,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

4.2 The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of three (3) years commencing as of January 21, 2026, unless terminated earlier as provided herein. The City or the consultant may terminate this Agreement without cause by providing the other party with at least thirty (30) days’ prior written notice.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
381 of 932

4.3 If Consultant’s Services include deliverable electronic visual presentation materials, such materials shall be delivered in a form, and made available to City, consistent with City Council-adopted policy for the same. It shall be the obligation of Consultant to obtain a copy of such policy from City staff.

ARTICLE 5 – PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT

5.1 Total compensation for Consultant ’s performance of the Services shall not exceed the amount of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000). City shall pay Consultant on a time and materials basis up to the not to exceed amount in accordance with the rates specified in Exhibit “B,” titled “Project and Fee Schedule” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

5.2 Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City describing the Services performed during the preceding month. Consultant’s invoices shall include a brief description of the Services performed, the dates the Services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of reimbursable expenses related to the Services. City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty (30) days after receipt and approval by City of Consultant’s invoice.

5.3 Any notice or other communication required, or which may be given, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in writing. Any such notice shall be deemed delivered (i) on the date of delivery in person; (ii) five (5) days after deposit in first class registered mail, with return receipt requested; (iii) on the actual delivery date if deposited with an overnight courier; or (iv) on the date sent by facsimile or electronic mail transmission (including PDF), if confirmed with a copy sent contemporaneously by first class, certified, registered or express mail; in each case properly posted and fully prepaid to the appropriate address set forth below, or such other address as a Party may provide notice in accordance with this section:

CITY: CONSULTANT:

City Clerk Michael D. Reason, Vice President
City of Redlands Geo-Logic Associates, Inc.
35 Cajon Street 2777 East Guasti Road, Suite 1
P.O. Box 3005 (mailing) Ontario, CA 91761
Redlands, CA 92373 [email protected]
[email protected] (909) 626-2282
Phone: (909) 798-7531

ARTICLE 6 – INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

6.1 The following insurance coverage required by this Agreement shall be maintained by Consultant for the duration of its performance of the Services. Consultant shall not Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
382 of 932
perform any Services unless and until the required insurance listed below is obtained by Consultant. Consultant shall provide City with certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing such insurance prior to commencement of the Services. Insurance policies shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation or modification of the policy except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City.

A. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability insurance in the amount that meets statutory requirements with an insurance carrier acceptable to City, or certification to City that Consultant is self -insured or exempt from the workers’ compensation laws of the State of California. Consultant shall execute and provide City with Exhibit “C,” titled “Workers’ Compensation Insurance Certification,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, prior to performance of the Services.

B. Comprehensive General L iability insurance with carriers acceptable to City in the minimum amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate , for public liability, property damage and personal injury is required. City shall be named as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non- contributing to any insurance or self -insurance maintained by City.

C. Consultant shall secure and maintain professional liability insurance throughout the term of this Agreement in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim made.

D. Business Auto L iability coverage, with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability. This coverage shall include all Consultant owned vehicles used in connection with Consultant’s provision of the Services, hired and non-owned vehicles, and employee non-ownership vehicles. City shall be named as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non- contributing to any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City.

E. Consultant is expressly prohibited from assigning or subcontracting any of the Services without the prior written consent of City. In the event of mutual agreement by the Parties to assign or subcontract a portion of the Services, Consultant shall add such assignee or subcontractor as an additional insured to the insurance policies required hereby and provide City with the insurance endorsements prior to any Services being performed by the assignee or subcontractor.

6.2 Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, including attorneys’ fees, arising from injury or death to persons or damage to property occasioned by any negligent act or omission by, or the willful misconduct of, Consultant, or its officers, employees and agents in performing the Services.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
383 of 932

ARTICLE 7 – CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

7.1 Consultant covenants and represents that it does not have any investment or interest in any real property that may be the subject of this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment that would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s Services. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder, no person having any such interest shall perform any Services under this Agreement.

7.2 Consultant agrees it is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:

A. Does not make a governmental decision whether to:

(i) approve a rate, rule or regulation, or adopt or enforce a City law; (ii) issue, deny, suspend or revoke any City permit, license, application, certification, approval, order or similar authorization or entitlement; (iii) authorize City to enter into, modify or renew a contract; (iv) grant City approval to a contract that requires City approval and to which City is a party, or to the specifications for such a contract; (v) grant City approval to a plan, design, report, study or similar item; (vi) adopt, or grant City approval of, policies, standards or guidelines for City or for any subdivision thereof.

B. Does not serve in a staff capacity with City and in that capacity, participate in making a governmental decision or otherwise perform the same or substantially the same duties for City that would otherwise be performed by an individual holding a position specified in City’s Conflict of I nterest Code under Government Code section 87302.

7.3 In the event City determines that Consultant must disclose its financial interests, Consultant shall complete and file a Fair Political Practices Commission Form 700, Statement of Economic Interests , with the City Clerk’s office pursuant to the written instructions provided by the City Clerk.

ARTICLE 8 – GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

8.1 In the event any action is commenced to enforce or interpret any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement the prevailing Party shall, in addition to any costs and other relief, be entitled to the recovery of its reasonable attorneys’ fees, including fees for the use of in-house counsel by a Party.

8.2 Consultant shall not assign any of the Services, except with the prior written approval of City and in s trict compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Any Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
384 of 932
assignment or attempted assignment without such prior written consent may, in the sole discretion of City, result in City’s immediate termination of this Agreement.

8.3 Consultant is for all purposes under this Agreement an independent contractor and shall perform the Services as an independent contractor . Neither City nor any its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or Consultant’s employees, except as herein set forth. Consultant shall supply all necessary tools and instrumentalities required to perform the Services. Assigned personnel employed by Consultant are for its account only, and in no event shall Consultant or personnel retained by it be deemed to have been employed by City or engaged by City for the account of, or on behalf of City. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent, nor shall Consultant have any authority, express or implied, to bind City to any obligation.

8.4 This Agreement may be terminated by City, in its sole discretion, by providing not less than five (5) days prior written notice to Consultant of City’s intent to terminate. If this Agreement is terminated by City, an adjustment to Consultant’s compensation shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit or unperformed S ervices, and (2) any payment du e Consultant at the time of termination may be adjusted to the extent of any additional costs to City occasioned by any default by Consultant. Upon receipt of a termination notice , Consultant shall immediately discontinue its provision of the Services and, within five (5) days of the date of the termination notice, deliver or otherwise make available to City, copies (in both hard copy and electronic form, where applicable) of project related data, design calculations, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by Consultant in performing the Services. Consultant shall be compensated on a pro-rata basis for Services completed up to the date of termination.

8.5 Consultant shall maintain books, ledgers, invoices , accounts and other records and documents evidencing costs and expenses related to the Services for a period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Such books shall be available at reasonable times for examination by City at the office of Consultant.

8.6 This Agreement, including the Exhibits incorporated herein by reference, represents the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties as to the matters contained herein, and any prior negotiations, written proposals or verbal agreements relating to such matters are superseded by this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided for herein, any amendment to this Agreement shall be in writing, approved by City and signed by City and Consultant.

8.7 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California , without regard to its conflicts of laws provisions. The Parties agree that all actions or proceedings arising in connection with this Agreement shall be tried and litigated only in the state courts located in San Bernardino County, California, and the federal courts located in Riverside County, California.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
385 of 932

8.8 If one or more of the sentences, clauses, paragraphs or sections contained in this Agreement is declared invalid, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder of this Agreement and shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining sentences, clauses, paragraphs or sections contained herein, unless to do so would deprive a Party of a material benefit of its bargain under this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of City and Consultant have signed in confirmation of this Agreement.

CITY OF REDLANDS GEO-LOGIC ASSOCIATES, INC.

By: ___________________________ By: _________________________ Mario Saucedo, Mayor Michael D. Reason, Vice President

ATTEST:

___________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
386 of 932
EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES

Monitoring Support. Consultant will collect the required samples from the designated sampling locations and submit samples to the City -selected, State certified laboratory for analysis.

Leachate samples will be collected and delivered to the laboratory by staff or consultant.

Task 1: Quarterly Groundwater Monitoring Reports. Consultant will perform all water quality sampling as required. During all monitoring reporting periods, consultant will review field notes and laboratory data in a timely fashion so that data review is completed quickly and any required RWQCB notification meets the deadlines established in Order No. R8-2004-0008 including amendments stipulated in Order No. R8-2008-0094. The data review will include:
• Providing technical and regulatory expertise to City staff. • Review of all field notes to verify that proper sampling techniques were utilized. • A thorough data quality check to verify that holding times, required analyses, reporting limits and laboratory precision requirements have been met. • Updating water level and groundwater quality databases. • Performance of a thorough quality control check on all data to verify that only correct information is input into the databases.

All sample analyses will be checked against sample collection dates to verify that holding times were met. Analytical results will also be checked to verify that all required analyses have been performed and that laboratory quality assurance results were within acceptable limits. Any identified problems will be detailed in the quarterly reports.

The procedure for laboratory data entry includes manual transfer of data into the existing database. Water level information and field data will also be manually input. All data entered into the database will be checked to ensure that the database is accurate. Laboratory reporting limits, BPO’s, and maximum concentration levels will be highlighted with bold font so that the reader can easily discern potential problems.

Statistical analysis of the water quality data will be performed by Consultant. In addition to the statistical analysis of metals surrogates and selected general minerals, selected volatile organic compounds detected at the landfill since September 1998, will be statistically analyzed to establish concentration limits equal to background concentrations during this portion of an extended evaluation monitoring period. VOC statistical analyses will be performed as data quantity and quality permit for each compound of concern, on a per -well basis, using intra -well methods as well as background- to-compliance comparisons. Charts and tables will be used to illustrate VOC statistical findings.

The quarterly groundwater monitoring reports will include the following information:
• A transmittal letter containing an abbreviated summary, including discussions on violations and any actions taken or planned.
• An executive summary of current monitoring results.
• A discussion of groundwater occurrence and movement, including hydrographs for each well, a groundwater elevation contour map, and groundwater gradient calculation.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
387 of 932
• A discussion of groundwater quality, including field and laboratory methods, statistical methodology and results, tabulated analytical results, copies of laboratory reports and chain of custody forms, copies of field forms, and graphs of constituents detected at concentrations exceeding intra-well statistical variances. • Sludge chemical analyses.
• Conclusions, and as needed, recommendations.
• All data entered into the database will be checked to ensure that the database is accurate.

Consultants shall provide the City with an executive summary of the quarterly reports before the 15 th day of each month following a quarterly reporting period for inclusion into the City’s quarterly report to the LEA as required by permit.

Task 2: Annual Groundwater Monitoring Reports. The annual groundwater monitoring reports will be prepared in combination with the yearly first quarter reports (January- March; report due April 30). In addition to the requirements listed in Task 1, the following items will be included in the annual reports:
• Groundwater monitoring well data summaries. Including tabular and graphical summaries of groundwater levels and sampling results for all annual data, graphical presentation of groundwater constituents that equaled or exceeded BPOs or maximum concentration levels during any quarter if the monitoring period, and summary table of vadose zone sample results.
• An annual summary, discussion and recommendations regarding the detection of VOCs, and any statistical background concentration limits for VOCs which were analyzed within the constraints of available data quality and quantity. • A discussion of groundwater quality at the CSL, a discussion of vadose zone quality and potential impacts to groundwater quality, and updated information relating to the groundwater monitoring systems and hydro-geology of the CSL.

Task 3: Leachate Sampling and Reporting. A sample of the leachate will be collected and analyzed for all EPA Appendix II constituents in October of each year. If compounds are detected in the October leachate sample, a retest sample will be collected the following April.

The retest sample will be tested only for the compounds that were detected for the first time in the October sample. The results of these analyses will be submitted in the appropriate quarterly report (fourth quarter for the October sample, second quarter for the April sample).

Task 4: Leachate (LCRS) Phase Two Annual Performance Monitoring System Testing.

The Phase Two performance monitoring system will be tested annually in accordance with the CSL Leachate Management Plan, Title 27 and the CSL Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs).

The annual test shall be performed no later than October 31 of each year or a date agreed upon by the RWQCB. A LCRS annual performance monitoring system test report form is required and is provided in the CSL’s Leachate Management Plan for the Consultant. A copy of the performance monitoring test report shall be provided to the RWQCB in accordance with the WDR monitoring and reporting program for the CSL reference in Section 3.6 of the Leachate Management Plan.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
388 of 932
Task 5: Leachate (LCRS) Regulatory Compliance Dye Test. To meet regulatory compliance at the California Street Landfill, California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 27, Section 20340 (d), and the CSL WDRs require that a landfill LCRS dye test be performed annually to demonstrate that the LCRS functions properly. Per the CSL Leachate Management Plan (LMP), annual testing of the Phase II LCRS is required by October 31 of each year to verify that liquid in the system drains to the collection sump, that liquid head over the primary line is less than 12 inches, and that the transducers are functioning properly. Consultant will perform all activities needed to perform the annual LCRS sump dye test including, but not limited to, ordering and installing leachate level transducers and flow meters, troubleshooting equipment, several trips to the field to confirm operation of equipment, communication with City staff, and project logistical support.

Task 6: Condensate (CCRS) Annual Sampling and Report Preparation. In accordance with the Condensate Management Plan, condensate from all condensate and collection recovery system (CCRS) will be sampled and analyzed no later than October 31 of each year. The samples will be analyzed for constituents listed in Appendix A. The analytical results of the condensate sampling and analysis performed in item 2 above will be reported to the RWQCB in the fourth quarter report due no later than January 31 of the following calendar year.

Task 7: Database Management. Each quarter, the existing database will be reviewed and edited such that only data relevant to the current groundwater movement, quality and hydrogeologic character is included for statistical analysis. A separate data base will also be maintained and updated as needed for historical trends.

Task 8: Landfill Expansion Support. Consultant will provide continued technical support for landfill related to cell construction and expansion in the event that additional phases are added during this agreement period. This task also includes project management, field support and all required witnessing, supervision, documentation, and reporting for the decommissioning or relocation of water quality monitoring wells, as needed.

Task 9: Other Tasks. Consultant will provide the City with general consulting services including all miscellaneous requests and technical support for all unforeseeable events related to groundwater and surface water quality and protection at the CSL.

In order to meet the City’s needs, and at the City’s request, Consultant will answer any questions or issues the City, regulators, or general public may have regarding groundwater and vadose zone quality at the landfill.

Deliverables. Deliverables will consist of formal memorandums, letter reports, and faxed information to be provided to City staff on a time and materials basis upon request. One draft copy of each technical report will be submitted to the City’s Facilities and Community services Department Director for review. After incorporation of the City’s comments, two bound copies of the final reports and one digital report will be submitted for the City’s use and distribution. In the case of quarterly and annual groundwater monitoring reports, two bound complete hard copies will be provided to the City. One hard bound copy of the final report and digital file will be submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board’s database for each Quarterly and Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
389 of 932
Annual Reports. All field work will be personally attended and witnessed firsthand by a geologist currently registered in the State of California, who will then certify all technical reports resulting from the work performed.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
390 of 932
EXHIBIT "B"
Project and Fee Schedule

Work Task
Principal
Professional
II

328
Senior
Professional
I

252
Project
Professional
II

226
Staff
Professional
II

173
Field
Tech
IV(PW)

170
GLA
Subtotal

($)
Vehicle
&
Sampling
Equip. /
Supplies

34 Expenses
(3% GLA
labor)

(3%)
Total
Quarterly

($)
2026 Cost

Based on
Fee
Schedule
Attached
2027 Cost

Includes
CPI
adjustment
of 3.1%
2028 Cost

Includes CPI
adjustment
of 3.1%
Tasks 1-7 Sampling and Reporting of Groundwater, Gas, Leachate, Condensate, and Other Materials, LCRS Performance, and Database Management First Quarter

$ 5,560

$ 5,733

$ 5,911
Sampling 0 .5 1 1 24 $ 4,605 24 $ 139 $ 5,560
Reporting 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 0 $ 0 $ 0
Totals: 0 0.5 1 1 24 $ 4,605 $ 816 $ 139 $ 5,560
Second Quarter

$ 9,705

$ 10,006

$ 10,317
Sampling 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 0 $ 0 $ 0
April Leachate Retesting 0 0 2 1 6 $ 1,645 6 $ 50 $ 1,899 Reporting 1 1 8 30 0 $ 7,578 0 $ 228 $ 7,806
Totals: 1 1 10 31 6 $ 9,223 $ 204 $ 278 $ 9,705
Third Quarter

$ 5,560

$ 5,733

$ 5,911
Sampling 0 0.5 1 1 24 $ 4,605 24 $ 139 $ 5,560
Reporting 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 0 $ 0 $ 0
Totals: 0 0.5 1 1 24 $ 4,605 $ 816 $ 139 $ 5,560
Fourth Quarter

$ 21,495

$ 22,162

$ 22,850
Sampling 0 0 0 0 0 $ 0 0 $ 0 $ 0
October Leachate Sampling 0 0 2 1 6 $ 1,645 6 $ 50 $ 1,899 Phase II LCRS Testing 1 1 4 0 40 $ 8,284 40 $ 249 $ 9,893 Reporting (includes annual report) 1 8 16 20 0 $ 9,420 0 $ 283 $ 9,703 Totals: 2 9 22 21 46 $ 19,349 $ 1,564 $ 582 $ 21,495
Annual Total (Tasks 1-7) $ 42,320 $ 43,634 $ 44,989
Task 8 – Landfill Expansion Support

as needed

as needed Labor and incidental costs for expansion support, as directed by City Task 9 – Other Tasks
as needed

as needed

as needed Labor and incidental costs for other tasks, as directed by City

TOTAL ESTIMATED COST FOR THREE YEARS OF SERVICES (TASKS 1-7): $ 130,943

Notes:

1. Monitoring costs include coordination with City- selected lab to obtain sample containers, sampling of groundwater monitoring wells, lysimeters, soil-pore gas probes, leachate, and condensate.

2. Reporting costs include database management, data validation, statistical analyses, preparation of groundwater elevation contour maps, preparation of text describing the monitoring event and results, and distribution of reports to appropriate agencies, including the State’s Geotracker Database.

3. Annual reports will be combined with the First Semiannual Monitoring Report, due April 30 of each year.

4. Each report will include results for all samples collected during the monitoring period.

5. Vehicle Equip./Supplies include equipment, vehicle, and miscellaneous costs (ice, coolers) associated with sampling.

6. Analytical costs are not included based on the RFP indicating that samples will be submitted to the City- selected laboratory.

7. Tasks 7 and 8 will be performed at the City’s request at the unit rates determined at the time of the request.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
391 of 932

Professional Staff
Staff Professional I .................................................................................................... $150.00/Hour Staff Professional II ...................................................................................................... 170.00/Hour Staff Professional III .................................................................................................... 186.00/Hour Project Professional 1 ................................................................................................... 199.00/Hour Project Professional II .................................................................................................. 222.00/Hour Project Professional III ................................................................................................ 240.00/Hour Senior Professional I .................................................................................................... 247.00/Hour Senior Professional II ................................................................................................... 266.00/Hour Senior Professional III ................................................................................................. 283.00/Hour Principal Professional I ................................................................................................ 296.00/Hour Principal Professional II ............................................................................................... 321.00/Hour Principal Professional III ............................................................................................. 350.00/Hour Court Appearance (Expert Witness, Deposition, etc..; four-hour minimum) ........... 2 x HourlyRate

Field Laboratory Staff
Technician I ................................................................................................................. 108.00/Hour Technician II ................................................................................................................ 130.00/Hour Technician III (or Minimum Prevailing Wage) ............................................................ 147.00/Hour Technician IV ............................................................................................................... 163.00/Hour Prevailing Wage Technician ........................................................................................ 170.00/Hour Laboratory Manager ..................................................................................................... 196.00/Hour Principal Technician .................................................................................................... 219.00/Hour Managing Technician ................................................................................................... 196.00/Hour

CAAD/GIS
CAAD/GIS/Database Manager 1 .................................................................................. 130.00/Hour CAAD/GIS/Database Manager II ................................................................................ 153.00/Hour CADD Designer ........................................................................................................... 170.00/Hour GIS Specialist ............................................................................................................... 170.00/Hour

Support Staff
Administrative Assistant I............................................................................................... 96.00/Hour Administrative Assistant II .......................................................................................... 116.00/Hour Administrative Assistant III ......................................................................................... 138.00/Hour Technical Editor ........................................................................................................... 123.00/Hour Senior Technical Editor ............................................................................................... 170.00/Hour *Overtime Premium is 35% of PERSONNEL CHARGE

Equipment Charges
BAT Permeameter ......................................................................................................... 200.00/Day Compaction Testing Equipment & Supplies..................................................................... 50.00/Day Peel & Shear Strength Apparatus (FML Seams) ....................................................... 900.00/Month Portable Laboratory (8’ x 32’ trailer) with equipment ................................................. 1,200/Month Portable Laboratory (mobilization /demobilization) ...........................................................1,500.00 Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
392 of 932
ReMi/Refraction Seismograph ....................................................................................... 600.00/Day Sealed Single Ring Infiltrometer (SSRI) ........................................... 200.00/Day or 750.00/Month Sealed Double Ring Infiltrometer (SDRI) ................................................................. Call for quote Slope Inclinometer ......................................................................................................... 250.00/Day Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drone) Reconnaissance ..................................................... 250.00/Day

Expenses
Vehicle use for Field Services ............................................................ 17.00/Hour or 500.00/Week Soil Sampling Equipment & Drilling Supplies ................................................................ 7.00/Hour Groundwater Sampling Equipment & Drilling Supplies ............................................... 17.00/Hour Per Diem .................................................................. Lesser of (Cost) of (Local Government Rate) Outside Services (Consultants, Surveys, Chemical lab Tests, etc.) ........................................... Cost Reimbursables (Maps, Photos, Permits, Expendable Supplies, etc.) ......................................... Cost Outside Equipment (Drill Rig, Backhoe, Monitoring Equipment, etc.) .................................... Cost

Permits, Fees and Bonds
The cost of all permits, fees, and performance bonds required by government agencies are to be paid by the Client, unless stated otherwise in an accompanying proposal.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
393 of 932
Test Name Test Method Unit Rate Geotechnical / Physical Properties
Moisture Content, gravimetric…………………………………………... D2216/D4643….….. $25/Test Moisture Content (volumetric and gravimetric) and Bulk Density………D2216/D4643….….. $40/Test Porosity……………………………………………………………………..…………….…….. $250/Test Particle Size Analyses
Standard Sieves and Hydrometer……………………………………..D422………….…….$250/Test Particle Size Analysis – Dry Sieve………………………………….. D421………………..$140/Test Particle Size Analysis- Aggregate, no hydrometer.………………..…D422/C136/CT202....$180/Test Particle Size Analysis with Gravel with hydrometer.…………….…..D422…………….….$300/Test Percent Passing #200 Sieve.…………….…………………………….D1140/C117.……….$110/Test Atterberg Limits
Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, Plasticity Index (LL, PL, and PI)………D4318………………$190/Test Liquid Limit………………………………………………………… D4318………………$105/Test Plastic Limit………………………………………………………….D4318/CTM 204…... $105/Test Specific Gravity,Fine (<4.75mm diameter materials)……………….D854……………….. $150/Test Specific Gravity,Coarse (>4.75mm diameter materials)…………….C127………………. .$130/Test Proctor Compaction Test
Method A or B (<25% retained on a 3/8” sieve)………………...D698/D1557………...$240/Test Method C (>25% retained on a 3/8” sieve)………………............D698/D1557………...$290/Test Moisture Density Single Point, std/mod (Proctor check point)………D698/D1557………...$90/Point Moisture Density Curve…………………………………………………..CTM 216 …………...$260/Test Percent Organic Matter by Muffle Furnace………………………………D2974… ……………$115/Test

Permeability / Conductivity Testing
Hydraulic Conductivity, Fixed Wall, up to 6” Diameter Cell ....................Modified…………….$315/Test Flexible Wall Method, 1” to 4” Diameter Sample…………….………….D5084……..………..$370/Test

Strength and Consolidation Testing

Consolidation Testing
Consolidation Test (single point) ……………………………………D2435………………$105/Test Consolidation Test (without rate data)……………………………….D2435………………$190/Test Test rate data per load increment……………………………………..D2435…………$80/Test-Load Expansion/Collapse Testing
Expansion Index of Soils…………………………………………….D4829………………$180/Test Expansion Index Test w/Cement or Lime treated soils……………...D4829………………$230/Test Strength Testing
Unconfined Compressive Strength(UC), 2-3”………………………D2166………………$125/Test Triaxial Compression
Unconsol.-Undrained Triax. Compression (UU), 2-3”,1-pt test……..D2850………………$215/Test Consolidated Undrained Triax. Compressions (CU),2-3”(per point)..D4767………………$500/Point Consolidated Drained Triax. Compressions (CD),2-3”(per point)…..D7181………………$745/Point Direct Shear
Direct Shear Test (saturated)…………………………………………D3080………………$90/Point Direct Shear Test (saturated, recycled- strain rate 0.0042”/min).……D3080…………...…$180/Point Direct Shear Test (consolidated drained).……………………………D3080……………...$205/Point Direct Shear Test (consolidated drained, residual)…………………..D3080……..…….…$350/Point Direct Shear Test (at natural moisture)………………………………D3080…………….…$80/Point Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
394 of 932
Test Name Test Method Unit Rate

R-Value …………………………………………………………………..D2844/CTM301…….$280/Test

Aggregate Testing
Sand Equivalent……………………………………………………….D2419/CMT 217………..$100/Test Durability Index (coarse)…………………………………….………..D3744/CMT 229………..$200/Test Durability Index (fine)……………………………………….………..D3744/CMT 229………..$180/Test

Soil with Amendments and Slurry Testing

R-Value (lime- or cement -treated soils)……………………………....D2844/CTM301………...$330/Test Compressive Strength, Soil Cement………………………………….. D1633/D1632………… $205/Point Pocket Penetrometer………………………………………………………………………………..$20/Test

Soil Chemistry

pH of Soil…………………………………………………………………………………………...$25/Test Chloride Content (subcontracted)………………………………………CTM 422………………..$65/Test Sulfate Content (subcontracted)………………………………………...CTM 417………………..$65/Test Soil Resistivity (subcontracted)………………………………………...G57/CTM 643………….$150/Test Corrosion Series (Min. resistivity, pH, SO
4, CI; subcontracted)………………………………….$240/Test

All test methods are ASTM unless otherwise noted.

Special sample preparation and laboratory testing not listed above will be charged at applicable personnel rates.

All laboratory test rates are for standard turn-around time and normal reporting procedures. Rush orders will be subject to a 25 percent premium. Manpower requirements or test protocol may preclude the granting of a rush request.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
395 of 932
EXHIBIT " C "

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION

Every employer, except the State, shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways:

(a) By being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurer s duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this State. (b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations, a certificate of consent to self-insure, either as an individual employer , or as one employer in a group of employers, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self -insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees.

CHECK ONE

_____I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self - insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement. (Labor Code §1861).

_____I affirm that at all times, in performing the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California. However, at any time, if I employ any person such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California, immediately I shall provide the City with a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certification of workers’ compensation insurance.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information and representations made in this certificate are true and correct.

GEO-LOGIC ASSOCIATES, INC

By: Date: ___________________
Michael D. Reason, Vice President

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
396 of 932
City Council Meeting I. 9.

DATE: 11/18/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve a Facility Use Agreement with the Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside for the use of the gymnasium at the Joe R Gonzales Community Center to provide day camp programs and determine that approval of the agreement is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (Facilities and Community Services Director Crocker).

MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

I move that the City Council determine that approval of the Facility Use Agreement with the Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside is exempt from environmental review in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3); and

1. Approve the Facility Use Agreement with the Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside for use of the Joe R Gonzales Community Center.

2. RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the Facility Use Agreement with the Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside. In addition, staff recommends that the City Council determine that the approval of the Agreement is exempt from environmental review in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3).

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
397 of 932
DISCUSSION:

In November 2019, the City Council approved a Facility Use Agreement (“Agreement”) with the Boys and Girls Club of Redlands (“BGCR”) for use of the Joe R Gonzales Community Center Gymnasium (“Gym”) located at 111 W.

Lugonia Avenue. BGCR has now requested to enter into a new Facility Use Agreement for continued use of the Gym for its day camp programs, along with a waiver of associated fees to support the program’s goals. The requested use does not conflict with any existing scheduled classes or programs. With approval of the Agreement, the City and BGCR will continue their partnership to provide recreational programming for youth participating in BGCR’s day camps.

The Agreement aligns with the City's Recreation Division’s goals of providing positive opportunities for youth ages 4 through 11 by promoting healthy physical activity and access to nutritional meals. This proposed Agreement represents a new term between the City and the Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside. A copy of the Agreement is attached for the City Council’s consideration. The terms of the agreement are for three years and will allow for the use of the gym during day camp operations (typically from 2pm–4pm during non-school periods such as summer, spring break, etc.) when not in use for other programs or classes.

Additionally, the approval of this Facility Use Agreement is categorically exempt from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3), which applies to the leasing of existing City facilities. The Agreement authorizes use of an existing facility and does not involve an expansion of the facility’s current or previous use.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may deny the approval of the Agreement.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Supports Objective E-8: Enhance recreational program services SUBMITTED BY:

Tabitha Crocker, Facilities and Community Services Director RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
398 of 932
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Joe Bierma, Administrative Analyst
Fiscal Impact
Fiscal Year: FY 2024-26
Revenue Generating: No
Appropriation Required Y/N: No
Discussion:

Should the agreement be approved, the per-hour room use fee which covers staff time will be waived.

Attachments
Facility Use Agreement - Boys and Girls Club
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
399 of 932

FACILITY USE AGREEMENT
This Facility Use Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into this 18th day of November, 2025 (“Effective Date"), by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation ("City"), and the Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Redlands-Riverside, a non-profit public benefit corporation (“BGCR"). City and BGCR are sometimes individually referred to herein as a "Party" and, together, as the "Parties."

RECITALS

WHEREAS, City’s Facilities and Community Services Department’s Recreation and Senior Services Division (“Division”) focuses on fostering community integration while preserving individuals' dignity and well-being; and

WHEREAS, the Division offers various programs aimed at enriching the lives of Redlands residents, which include programs and community partnerships, promoting nutrition and healthy eating habits, encouraging active living, and providing essential informational services; and

WHEREAS, the Division partners with BGCR to ensure youth have access to affordable and nutritious meals and recreational programs; and

WHEREAS, City and BGCR wish to enter into this Agreement to formalize the partnership between the City and BGCR regarding the use of the City’s Joe R. Gonzales Community Center Gymnasium (the “Premises”) for the operation of BGCR’s day camp programs.

ARTICLE 1. PREMISES

1.1 City grants BGCR a non-exclusive right to use the Premises as described and in Exhibit “A” below pursuant to the terms and conditions in this Agreement:

Joe R Gonzales Community Center - Gymnasium Only
Located at 111 West Lugonia Avenue, Redlands, California

ARTICLE 2. TERM

2.1 This Agreement shall be for a term of three (3) years commencing on its Effective Date, unless earlier terminated as provided for herein.

2.2 Either Party may terminate this Agreement, without cause, by providing at least ninety (90) days prior written notice to the other Party specifying the date for termination of this Agreement.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
400 of 932
ARTICLE 3. RENTAL FEE

3.1 Based on the public purpose set forth in the Recitals herein, the rental fee will be One Dollar ($1) per year for the use of the Premises during the term of this Agreement.

ARTICLE 4. USE OF PREMISES

4.1 The Premises shall be used for the exclusive purpose of operating the BGCR’s summer day camp program (“Program”) as described in Section 4.2. BGCR shall not use or permit the Premises to be used for any other purpose without the prior written consent of the City.

4.2 The Program is open to children between the ages of 4 – 11 years old beginning June 1 through July 31. The Program will operate five (5) days a week (Monday through Friday) starting at 7:00 a.m. and ending at 6:00 p.m.

4.3 City will provide BGCR access to the Premises for the Program. During the term of this Agreement, BGCR shall conduct the Program only on the Premises in accordance with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, and in ensuring the safety of participants of the Program and BGCR employees, agents and volunteers . BGCR shall assume full responsibility for its and its employees’ personal property used on the Premises and shall indemnify and hold City harmless for any theft or damage relating to BGCR’s or BGCR’s employees’ personal property. BGCR shall, at its own cost and expense, maintain insurance for all personal property on the Premises as set forth in Section 7 of this Agreement.

4.4 BGCR shall be solely responsible for any set up and cleaning associated with its use of the Premises and shall maintain the Premises in a clean and litter-free manner. BGCR shall be responsible for ensuring all of its employees, agents and volunteers staff meet all applicable County Health Department requirements for food preparation and handling.

BGCR shall not place any locks on the interior or exterior of the Premises without the prior written permission of City’s Facilities and Community Services Director.

4.5 BGCR shall not commit, or permit the commission of, any acts on the Premises, or use or permit the use of the Premises, in any manner that will increase the existing rates for, or cause the cancellation of, any fire, liability, or other insurance policy insuring the Premises or the improvements on the Premises.

4.6 BGCR shall not commit, or permit the commission by others, of any waste on the Premises. BGCR shall not maintain, commit, or permit the maintenance or commission of any nuisance on the Premises, and BGCR shall not use or permit the use of the Premises for any unlawful purpose.

4.7 BGCR shall operate Program with its own employees, contractors , agents and volunteers, and shall not utilize city officials, employees or volunteers to operate Program. BGCR employees, agents and volunteers shall be background checked as required under law.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
401 of 932

5. ARTICLE 5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR

5.1 It is the express intention of the Parties that BGCR is, and shall remain during the term of this Agreement, an independent contractor and not be an agent or employee of City.

BGCR represents to City that it is free from the control of City as to how BGCR’s Program is provided to the public; the Program provided by BGCR is not part of City’s business operations; BGCR is providing the same or similar Program to other persons and entities through BGCR’s business operation, or through other businesses; and that BGCR agrees that the Program conducted within the Premises is not BGCR ‘s sole source of business. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted or construed as creating or establishing the relationship of employer and employee, joint venturer or partnership between BGCR and City. The Parties acknowledge that BGCR’s employees are not employees of City for State tax, Federal tax, or any other purpose.

ARTICLE 6. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS

6.1 BGCR shall, at BGCRs sole cost and expense, comply with all statutes, ordinances, regulations, and requirements of all governmental entities, federal, state and county or municipal, relating to BGCRs use and occupancy of the Premises for BGCR’s Program whether those statutes, ordinances, regulations, and requirements are now in force or are subsequently enacted. The judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, or the admission by BGCR in a proceeding brought against BGCR by any government entity that BGCR has violated any such statute, ordinance, regulation, or requirement shall be conclusive as between City and BGCR and shall constitute grounds for termination of this Agreement by City.

ARTICLE 7. INDEMNITY AND INSURANCE

7.1 BGCR shall maintain the following insurance for the duration of BGCR ‘s occupation and use of the Premises during the term of this Agreement. This section shall survive any termination or expiration of this Agreement:

A. Comprehensive general liability insurance, with carriers acceptable to City, with minimum coverage of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate for public liability, property damage and personal injury. City shall be names as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non-contributing to any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City. A certificate of insurance with endorsements evidencing such coverage shall be provided to City prior to BGCR ‘s occupancy of the Premises.

B. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability insurance in the amount that meets statutory requirements with an insurance carrier acceptable to City, or certification to City that BGCR is self-insured or exempt from the worker’s compensation laws of the State of California. BGCR shall provide City with Exhibit “B,” titled “Workers’ Compensation Insurance Certification,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference prior to occupancy of the Premises.

C. Sexual Abuse or Molestation (SAM) Liability: If the comprehensive general liability insurance policy referenced above is not endorsed to include affirmative Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
402 of 932
coverage for sexual abuse or molestation, BGCR shall obtain and maintain a policy covering Sexual Abuse and Molestation with a limit no less than $1,000,000 per occurrence or claim.

7.2 BGCR shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, and its elected officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers, from any and all damages, costs, suits, claims, losses and liability for injury to persons including death, and damage to
property, arising out of, or in connection with the Program, this Agreement, and any act or omission of BGCR or its officers, employees, agents or volunteers, in connection with operation of BGCR’s business operations or the Program conducted at the Premises.

ARTICLE 8. TAXES AND UTILITIES

8.1 City shall pay, and hold BGCR free and harmless from, all charges for the furnishing of gas, water, sewer, electricity, solid waste disposal and other public utilities provided to the Premises during the term of this Agreement. BGCR shall pay, and hold City free and harmless from, all charges for telephone usage by BGCR at the Premises.

ARTICLE 9. ATTORNEYS’ FEES

9.1 In the event any action is commenced to enforce or interpret the ter ms or conditions of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall, in addition to any costs and other relief, be entitled to the recovery of its reasonable attorneys’ fees, including fees for use of in-house counsel by a Party.

ARTICLE 10. NOTICES

10.1 Any notice or other communication required, or which may be given, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in writing. Any such notice shall be deemed delivered (i) on the date of delivery in person; (ii) five (5) days after deposit in first class registered mail, with return receipt requested; (iii) on the actual delivery date if deposited with an overnight courier; or (iv) on the date sent by facsimile, if confirmed with a copy sent contemporaneously by first class, certified, registered or express mail; in each case properly posted and fully prepaid to the appropriate address set forth below, or such other address as a party may provide notice in accordance with this section:

CITY: BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS of
GREATER REDLANDS-RIVERSIDE:

City Clerk Montrice Shabete
City of Redlands BGCR – Chief Operating Officer 35 Cajon Street 1251 Clay Street
P.O. Box 3005 (mailing) Redlands, CA 92374
Redlands, CA 92373 [email protected]
[email protected] (909) 798-4599
(909) 798-7531
ARTICLE 11. MISCELLANEOUS

11.1 BGCR shall not encumber, assign, or otherwise transfer this Agreement, any right or Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
403 of 932
interest in this Agreement, or any right or interest in the Premises or any improvements that may now or hereafter be constructed or installed on the Premises. Any encumbrance, assignment, transfer or subletting by BGCR without the prior written consent of City, whether voluntary or involuntary, by operation of law or otherwise, is void and shall, at the option of the City, result in immediate termination of this Agreement.

11.2 This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between City and BGCR respecting BGCR ‘s use of the Premises and sets forth the obligations of City and BGCR to each other as of its Effective Date. Any agreements or representations between the Parties respecting the Premises not expressly set forth in this Agreement are null and void. Any modifications
to this Agreement shall be in writing and executed by both Parties.

Executed as of the 18th day of November 2025, at Redlands, California.

CITY OF REDLANDS BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS of

GREATER REDLANDS-RIVERSIDE

Mario Saucedo, Mayor Montrice Shabete, Chief Operations Officer

ATTEST

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
404 of 932

EXHIBIT A

PREMISES

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
405 of 932

EXHIBIT “B”

WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION

Every employer, except the State, shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways:

(a) By being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this State. (b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations, a certificate of consent to self-insure, either as an individual employer, or as one employer in a group of employers, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self -insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees.

CHECK ONE

I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement. (Labor Code §1861).

I affirm that at all times, in performing the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California. However, at any time, if I employ any person such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California, immediately I shall provide the City with a certificate of consent to self -insure, or a certification of workers’ compensation insurance.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information and representations made in this certificate are true and correct.

BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS of

GREATER REDLANDS-RIVERSIDE

By:

Montrice Shabete, Chief Operating Officer
Date:

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
406 of 932
City Council Meeting J. 1.

DATE: 11/18/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Presentation of the 2025 National Community Survey (NCS) Results (Assistant City Manager McConnell)
MOTION:

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to receive and file the presentation on the results of the 2025 National Community Survey (NCS) conducted by Policy Confluence, Inc. dba Polco.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council receive and file a presentation on the results of the 2025 National Community Survey (NCS) conducted by Policy Confluence, Inc. dba Polco.

DISCUSSION:

In July 2021, as part of a multifaceted approach towards the development of a strategic vision for Redlands, the City Manager's Office contracted with Policy Confluence, Inc. dba Polco to conduct a community-wide survey. The survey instrument, known as the National Community Survey (NCS), includes standard questions for measuring resident satisfaction levels and perceptions about the quality of local government services and a half page of customized questions regarding specific local issues. The standardized portions of the NCS allow Polco to provide benchmark comparisons to any of the hundreds of communities that have conducted the survey. The NCS is the only resident survey tool endorsed by the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) and the National League of Cities. The results of the 2021 NCS were presented to the City Council in November 2021. Each year since then, the NCS instrument has been distributed to a randomly selected sample of Redlands residents reflective of the City's population and demographics. The results have been Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
407 of 932
reflective of the City's population and demographics. The results have been presented to the City Council and made available to the public following each survey period.

In order to effectively gauge Redlands residents' continued satisfaction with City services, in August 2025, the City released the 2025 NCS. During the months of August, September and early October, Polco collected and compiled the results into the report which will be presented to the City Council and the public this evening. The report will highlight historical trends since 2021, noting areas where the City receives positive feedback from Redlands residents, while also identifying areas where City services can improve.

SUBMITTED BY:

Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Charles M. Duggan, Jr., City Manager
PREPARED BY:

Carl Baker, Public Information Officer
Fiscal Impact
Discussion:

There is no fiscal impact associated with the receipt and filing of the 2025 National Community Survey.

Attachments
2025 NCS Report
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
408 of 932
Redlands,CA
The National Community Survey
Report of Results
2025
Visit us online!
www.polco.us
National Research Center at Polco
is a charter member of the AAPOR
Transparency Initiative, providing
clear disclosure of our sound and
ethical survey research practices.

Report by:

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
409 of 932
Table of Contents

About The NCS™ ............................................................................. 1 - Purpose of the Survey
- How Results Are Reported
- Comparisons to Benchmarks
- Trends Over Time
Methods ............................................................................................ 3 - Selecting the Survey Recipients
- Conducting the Survey
- Analyzing the Data
- Contact Information
- Study Limitations
- Survey Validity
Key Findings ..................................................................................... 6 - Community Strengths
- Focus Areas
- Other Notable Results
- Areas of Greatest Change
Facets of Livability............................................................................. 8 - Overview and Gap Analysis
- Quality and Importance Ratings
Quality of Life .................................................................................... 9 Governance ..................................................................................... 10 Economy .......................................................................................... 12 Mobility ............................................................................................. 14 Community Design ........................................................................... 16 Utilities ............................................................................................. 18 Safety ............................................................................................... 19 Natural Environment ........................................................................ 21 Parks and Recreation ....................................................................... 22 Health and Wellness ........................................................................ 23 Education, Arts, and Culture ............................................................ 25 Inclusivity and Engagement ............................................................. 27 Custom Questions............................................................................ 29 Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
410 of 932
About The NCS™
The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™) report is about the “livability” of Redlands. A livable community is a place that is not simply habitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where people do live, but where they want to live. The survey was developed by the experts from National Research Center at Polco.

Great communities are partnerships of the government, private sector, community-based organizations and residents, all geographically connected. The NCS captures residents’ opinions considering ten central facets of a community:
• Economy
• Mobility
• Community Design
• Utilities
• Safety
• Natural Environment
• Parks and Recreation
• Health and Wellness
• Education, Arts, and Culture
• Inclusivity and Engagement
How the results are reported
For the most part, the percentages presented in the following tabs represent the “percent positive.” Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, etc.). On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data.” However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in most of the tabs. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item.

Comparisonstobenchmarks
NRC’s database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 500 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Community Survey.

The comparison evaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community in the last five years.

NRC adds the latest results quickly upon survey completion, keeping the benchmark data fresh and relevant. The communities in the database represent a wide geographic and population range. In each tab, Redlands's results are noted as being “higher” than the benchmark, “lower” than the benchmark, or “similar” to the benchmark, meaning that the average rating given by Redlands residents is statistically similar to or different (greater or lesser) than the benchmark. Being rated as “higher” or “lower” than the benchmark means that Redlands's average rating for a particular item was more than 10 points different than the benchmark. If a rating was “much higher” or “much lower,” then Redlands's average rating was more than 20 points different when compared to the benchmark.

Trendsovertime
Trend data for Redlands represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or declines.¹ Deviations from stable trends over time represent opportunities for understanding how local policies, programs, or public information may have affected residents' opinions. Changes between survey years have been noted with an arrow and the percent difference. If the difference is greater than 8.3 percentage points between the 2025 and 2024 surveys, the change is statistically significant.

1. In 2020, The NCS survey was updated to include new and refreshed items. Consequently, some of the trends may be impacted due to wording modifications that could have potentially altered the meaning of the item for the respondent.

The report provides the opinions of a representative sample of 308 residents of the City of Redlands collected from August 4th, 2025 to September 16th, 2025. The margin of error around any reported percentage is 5.6% for all respondents and the response rate for the 2024 survey was 11%. Survey results were weighted so that the demographic profile of respondents was representative of the demographic profile of adults in Redlands.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
411 of 932
AboutTheNCS™
The National Community Survey™ (The NCS™) report is about the “livability” of Redlands. A livable community is a place that is not simply habitable, but that is desirable. It is not only where people do live, but where they want to live. The survey was developed by the experts from National Research Center at Polco.

Great communities are partnerships of the government, private sector, community-based organizations and residents, all geographically connected. The NCS captures residents’ opinions considering ten central facets of a community:
• Economy
• Mobility
• Community Design
• Utilities
• Safety
• Natural Environment
• Parks and Recreation
• Health and Wellness
• Education, Arts, and Culture
• Inclusivity and Engagement
Howtheresultsarereported
For the most part, the percentages presented in the following tabs represent the “percent positive.” Most commonly, the percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, etc.). On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data.” However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in most of the tabs. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item.

Comparisons to benchmarks
NRC’s database of comparative resident opinion is comprised of resident perspectives gathered in surveys from over 500 communities whose residents evaluated the same kinds of topics on The National Community Survey.

The comparison evaluations are from the most recent survey completed in each community in the last five years.

Trends over time
Trend data for Redlands represent important comparison data and should be examined for improvements or declines.¹ Deviations from stable trends over time represent opportunities for understanding how local policies, programs, or public information may have affected residents' opinions. Changes between survey years have been noted with an arrow and the percent difference. If the difference is greater than 8.3 percentage points between the 2025 and 2024 surveys, the change is statistically significant.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
412 of 932
The survey dat
asets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month.

On many of the questions in the survey respondents may answer “don’t know.” The proportion of respondents giving this reply is shown in the full set of responses included in the tab “Complete data”. However, these responses have been removed from the analyses presented in the reports. In other words, the tables and graphs display the responses from respondents who had an opinion about a specific item.

Contact
The City of Redlands funded this research. Please contact Carl Baker of the City of Redlands at [email protected] if you have any questions about the survey.

StudyLimitations
All public opinion research is subject to unmeasured error. While the methodologies employed for this survey were designed to minimize this error as much as possible, these other sources of potential error should be acknowledged.Non-responseerror arises when those who were selected to participate in the survey did not do so, and may have different opinions or experiences than those who did respond.Coverageerror refers to the possibility that some respondents that should have been included in the surveyed population were not (e.g., for a general resident survey, USPS mailing lists may exclude certain types of housing units, such as multi-family buildings where mail is delivered to a common area rather than to a specific unit (though this is rare), or where mail is received at a PO box instead of the at household's physical location. Finally,recallbias occurs when respondents may not perfectly remember their experiences in the past year (such as participation in social or civic events), andsocialdesirabilitybias may cause respondents to answer in ways they think cast their responses in a more favorable light.

SurveyValidity
See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity athttps://blog.polco.us/polco-knowledgebase/margin-of- error-and-confidence-level-in-survey-results

2. See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information athttps://aapor.org/standards-and-ethics/standard-definitions/

3. Pasek, J. (2014). ANES Weighting Algorithm. Retrieved fromhttps://surveyinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Full-anesrake-paper.pdf

NRC aligns demographic labels with those used by the U.S. Census for reporting purposes, when possible. Some categories (e.g., age, race/Hispanic origin, housing type, and length of residency) are combined into smaller subgroups.

Methods
Selecting survey recipients
All households within the City of Redlands were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codes serving Redlands was purchased from Polco's mailing vendor, Go-Dog Direct, based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip codes that serve the City of Redlands households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file. Addresses located outside of the City of Redlands boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey.

Each address identified as being within city boundaries was further identified as being within one of the 5 areas.

Conducting the survey
The 3000 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on August 4th, 2025 and data collection for the survey remained open for 6 weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained a cover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online, as well as QR codes to further encourage participation. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed the survey to do so, and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again.

The survey was available in English and Spanish. All mailings contained paragraphs in both languages instructing participants on how to complete the survey in their preferred language.

About 2% of the 3,000 mailed invitations or surveys were returned because the household address was vacant or the postal service was unable to deliver the survey as addressed. Of the remaining 2,930 households that received the invitations to participate, 308 completed the survey, providing an overall response rate of 11%. Of the 308 responses, 303 were completed in English and 5 were completed in Spanish.The response rate was calculated using AAPOR’s response rate #2 for mailed surveys of unnamed persons.² It is customary to describe the precision of estimates made from surveys by a “level of confidence” and accompanying “confidence interval” (or margin of error). A traditional level of confidence, and the one used here, is 95%. The 95% confidence interval can be any size and quantifies the sampling error or imprecision of the survey results because some residents’ opinions are relied on to estimate all residents’ opinions. The margin of error for the City of Redlands survey is no greater than plus or minus 5.6 percentage points around any given percent reported for all respondents (308 completed surveys).

In addition to the randomly selected “probability sample” of households, a link to an online open-participation survey was publicized by the City of Redlands. The open-participation survey was identical to the random sample survey, with two small updates; it asked a question to confirm the respondent was a resident of Redlands and also a question about where they heard about the survey. The open-participation survey was open to all city residents and became available on September 1st, 2025. The survey remained open for 2 weeks. The data presented in the following tabs exclude the open participation survey data, but a tab at the end provides the complete frequency of responses to questions by the open-participation respondents.

Analyzing the data
Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses.

The demographics of the survey respondents were compared to those found in the 2020 Census and 2023 American Community Survey estimates for adults in the City of Redlands. The primary objective of weighting survey data is to make the survey respondents reflective of the larger population of the community. The characteristics used for weighting were age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, housing type, housing tenure, and area. No adjustments were made for design effects. Weights were calculated using an iterative, multiplicative raking model known as the ANES Weighting Algorithm.³
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
413 of 932
Conductingthesurvey
The 3000 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on August 4th, 2025 and data collection for the survey remained open for 6 weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained a cover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online, as well as QR codes to further encourage participation. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed the survey to do so, and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again.

The survey was available in English and Spanish. All mailings contained paragraphs in both languages instructing participants on how to complete the survey in their preferred language.

The survey datasets were analyzed using all or some of a combination of the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS), R, Python and Tableau. For the most part, the percentages presented in the reports represent the “percent positive.” The percent positive is the combination of the top two most positive response options (i.e., excellent/good, very safe/somewhat safe, essential/very important, etc.), or, in the case of resident behaviors/participation, the percent positive represents the proportion of respondents indicating “yes” or participating in an activity at least once a month.

Contact
The City of Redlands funded this research. Please contact Carl Baker of the City of Redlands at [email protected] if you have any questions about the survey.

SurveyValidity
See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://blog.polco.us/polco-knowledgebase/margin-of- error-and-confidence-level-in-survey-results

2. See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://aapor.org/standards-and-ethics/standard-definitions/

3. Pasek, J. (2014). ANES Weighting Algorithm. Retrieved from https://surveyinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Full-anesrake-paper.pdf

4. Targets come from the 2020 Census and 2023 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target ⁴
Age 18-34
35-54
55+
Area Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Hispanic
origin
No, not of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin
Yes, I consider myself to be of Hispanic,
Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin
Housing
tenure
Own
Rent
Housing type Attached
Detached
Race &
Hispanic
origin
Not white alone
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino
Sex Man
Woman
Sex/age Man 18-34
Man 35-54
Man 55+
Woman 18-34
Woman 35-54
Woman 55+
34%
32%
34%
38%
35%
26%
71%
24%
6%
20%
19%
15%
17%
28%
22%
19%
14%
16%
29%
30%
20%
24%
9%
16%
33%
67%
33%
67%
17%
83%
43%
57%
43%
57%
18%
82%
64%
36%
64%
36%
79%
21%
48%
52%
47%
53%
72%
28%
53%
47%
59%
41%
56%
44%
19%
16%
18%
15%
15%
16%
21%
18%
20%
17%
17%
7%
37%
14%
4%
33%
10%
1%
Analyzingthedata
Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses.

Methods
Selectingsurveyrecipients
All households within the City of Redlands were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codes serving Redlands was purchased from Polco's mailing vendor, Go-Dog Direct, based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip codes that serve the City of Redlands households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file. Addresses located outside of the City of Redlands boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey.

Each address identified as being within city boundaries was further identified as being within one of the 5 areas.

From that list, addresses were randomly selected as survey recipients, with multi-family housing units (defined as those with a unit number) sampled at a rate of 5:3 compared to single family housing units. 4 Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
414 of 932
Conductingthesurvey
The 3000 randomly selected households received mailings beginning on August 4th, 2025 and data collection for the survey remained open for 6 weeks. The first mailing was a postcard inviting the household to participate in the survey. The next mailing contained a cover letter with instructions, the survey questionnaire, and a postage-paid return envelope. All mailings included a web link to give residents the opportunity to respond to the survey online, as well as QR codes to further encourage participation. All follow-up mailings asked those who had not completed the survey to do so, and those who had already done so to refrain from completing the survey again.

The survey was available in English and Spanish. All mailings contained paragraphs in both languages instructing participants on how to complete the survey in their preferred language.

Contact
The City of Redlands funded this research. Please contact Carl Baker of the City of Redlands at [email protected] if you have any questions about the survey.

Study Limitations
All public opinion research is subject to unmeasured error. While the methodologies employed for this survey were designed to minimize this error as much as possible, these other sources of potential error should be acknowledged. Non-response error arises when those who were selected to participate in the survey did not do so, and may have different opinions or experiences than those who did respond. Coverage error refers to the possibility that some respondents that should have been included in the surveyed population were not (e.g., for a general resident survey, USPS mailing lists may exclude certain types of housing units, such as multi-family buildings where mail is delivered to a common area rather than to a specific unit (though this is rare), or where mail is received at a PO box instead of the at household's physical location. Finally, recall bias occurs when respondents may not perfectly remember their experiences in the past year (such as participation in social or civic events), and social desirability bias may cause respondents to answer in ways they think cast their responses in a more favorable light.

Survey Validity
See the Polco Knowledge Base article on survey validity at https://blog.polco.us/polco-knowledgebase/margin-of- error-and-confidence-level-in-survey-results

2. See AAPOR's Standard Definitions for more information at https://aapor.org/standards-and-ethics/standard-definitions/

3. Pasek, J. (2014). ANES Weighting Algorithm. Retrieved from https://surveyinsights.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Full-anesrake-paper.pdf

4. Targets come from the 2020 Census and 2023 American Community Survey Unweighted Weighted Target ⁴
Age 18-34
35-54
55+
Area Area 1
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Area 5
Hispanic
origin
No, not of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin
Yes, I consider myself to be of Hispanic,
Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin
Housing
tenure
Own
Rent
Housingtype Attached
Detached
Race&
Hispanic
origin
Not white alone
White alone, not Hispanic or Latino
Sex Man
Woman
Sex/age Man 18-34
Man 35-54
Man 55+
Woman 18-34
Woman 35-54
Woman 55+
Analyzingthedata
Responses from mailed surveys were entered into an electronic dataset using a “key and verify” method, where all responses are entered twice and compared to each other. Any discrepancies were resolved in comparison to the original survey form. Range checks as well as other forms of quality control were also performed. Responses from surveys completed on Polco were downloaded and merged with the mailed survey responses.

Methods
Selectingsurveyrecipients
All households within the City of Redlands were eligible to participate in the survey. A list of all households within the zip codes serving Redlands was purchased from Polco's mailing vendor, Go-Dog Direct, based on updated listings from the United States Postal Service. Since some of the zip codes that serve the City of Redlands households may also serve addresses that lie outside of the community, the exact geographic location of each housing unit was compared to community boundaries using the most current municipal boundary file. Addresses located outside of the City of Redlands boundaries were removed from the list of potential households to survey.

Each address identified as being within city boundaries was further identified as being within one of the 5 areas.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
415 of 932
Key Findings
Community Strengths:

Residents express strong satisfaction with their overall quality of life. ●Most residents rated Redland’s overall image or reputation as excellent or good (85%), a figure that remained higher than national benchmark.
●Redlands as a place to raise children was positively rated by about 9 in 10 participants. ●About 9 in 10 community members would recommend living in Redlands, higher than the national benchmark. A similar proportion of residents stated that they planned to remain in the community for the next five years. ●Many community members appreciated Redlands’ availability of preventative health services and affordable quality mental health care, both of which increased significantly since 2024.

Perceptions of local government have improved since 2024. ●The City of Redlands received a 17 percentage point increase for the quality of services provided to residents, improving from 58% in 2024 to 75% in 2025.
●Confidence in City government increased since 2024, with about 5 in 10 residents offering a positive rating compared to 4 in 10 in 2024.
●Ratings for the overall direction the City is taking also increased, with over half of respondents (58%) responding positively.
●Many measures related to governance—such as being open and transparent, and treating all residents fairly—experienced significant increases, with about 5 in 10 community members expressing satisfaction.

Compared to national sentiments, community members appreciate the local economy. ●About 7 in 10 residents rated Redlands as an excellent or good place to work and to visit, both higher than the national benchmark with the rating for Redlands as a place to work increasing significantly since 2024. ●The vibrancy of the downtown/commercial area was rated positively by 81% of respondents, landing much higher than benchmark.

Focus Areas:

Aspects of the natural environment indicate room for growth. ●Air quality was rated positively by about 4 in 10 residents, much lower than the national benchmark. ●Only 34% of respondents rated water resources positively, a rating also much lower than the comparison communities.
●Though 5 in 10 community members rated open space as positive, reviews dropped significantly since 2024 (10 percentage points).

Affordability and community development continue to be challenges. ●About 4 in 10 community members rated the availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool as positive, though similar to national ratings.
●Only about half of residents positively rated employment opportunities (47%) as positive. ●Affordable quality housing received positive reviews from about 2 in 10 respondents, although similar to the national average.
●Well-planned residential and commercial growth also show room for improvement with only 47% of residents rating them positively.

Other notable results:
●Most respondents stated that they hadnot heard about any work by the City of Redlands to help people experiencing homelessness in the last two years.
●Of those who had heard about reduction efforts towards homelessness, 5 in 10 believed that the City’s efforts to support people experiencing homelessness have been successful. ●Residents rated enforcing “no camping” ordinances in public parks and rights of way as the most important solution to help address homelessness, followed by providing access to healthcare and substance abuse treatment. ●Community members identified homelessness and public safety (police and fire) as top priorities for the future.

Areas of greatest change since 2024:

Of the evaluative questions included on both the 2024 and 2025 iterations, 93 were statistically similar to previous results. Upward trends were seen in 25 items, while 3 ratings decreased since 2024. The most significant of those trends are listed below.

Residentsexpressstrongsatisfactionwiththeiroverallqualityoflife. ●Most residents rated Redland’s overall image or reputation as excellent or good (85%), a figure that remained higher than national benchmark.
●Redlands as a place to raise children was positively rated by about 9 in 10 participants. ●About 9 in 10 community members would recommend living in Redlands, higher than the national benchmark. A similar proportion of residents stated that they planned to remain in the community for the next five years. ●Many community members appreciated Redlands’ availability of preventative health services and affordable quality mental health care, both of which increased significantly since 2024.

Perceptionsoflocalgovernmenthaveimprovedsince2024.
●The City of Redlands received a 17 percentage point increase for the quality of services provided to residents, improving from 58% in 2024 to 75% in 2025.
●Confidence in City government increased since 2024, with about 5 in 10 residents offering a positive rating compared to 4 in 10 in 2024.
●Ratings for the overall direction the City is taking also increased, with over half of respondents (58%) responding positively.
●Many measures related to governance—such as being open and transparent, and treating all residents fairly—experienced significant increases, with about 5 in 10 community members expressing satisfaction.

Comparedtonationalsentiments,communitymembersappreciatethelocaleconomy. ●About 7 in 10 residents rated Redlands as an excellent or good place to work and to visit, both higher than the national benchmark with the rating for Redlands as a place to work increasing significantly since 2024. ●The vibrancy of the downtown/commercial area was rated positively by 81% of respondents, landing much higher than benchmark.

Focus Areas:

Aspectsofthenaturalenvironmentindicateroomforgrowth.
●Air quality was rated positively by about 4 in 10 residents, much lower than the national benchmark. ●Only 34% of respondents rated water resources positively, a rating also much lower than the comparison communities.
●Though 5 in 10 community members rated open space as positive, reviews dropped significantly since 2024 (10 percentage points).

Affordabilityandcommunitydevelopmentcontinuetobechallenges. ●About 4 in 10 community members rated the availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool as positive, though similar to national ratings.
●Only about half of residents positively rated employment opportunities (47%) as positive. ●Affordable quality housing received positive reviews from about 2 in 10 respondents, although similar to the national average.

Other notable results:
●Most respondents stated that they had not heard about any work by the City of Redlands to help people experiencing homelessness in the last two years.
●Of those who had heard about reduction efforts towards homelessness, 5 in 10 believed that the City’s efforts to support people experiencing homelessness have been successful. ●Residents rated enforcing “no camping” ordinances in public parks and rights of way as the most important solution to help address homelessness, followed by providing access to healthcare and substance abuse treatment. ●Community members identified homelessness and public safety (police and fire) as top priorities for the future.

Areas of greatest change since 2024:

Increases
●Quality of City of Redlands services (+17%)
●Overall confidence in Redlands government (+15%)
●City of Redlands being open and transparent to the public (+14%) ●Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations; +14%)
Decreases
●Yard waste pick-up (-17%)
●Ambulance or emergency medical services (-10%)
●Redlands open space (-10%)
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
417 of 932
Facets of livability
Every jurisdiction must balance limited resources while meeting resident needs and striving to optimize community livability. To this end, it is helpful to know what aspects of the community are most important to residents and which they perceive as being of higher or lower quality. It is especially helpful to know when a facet of livability is considered of high importance but rated as lower quality, as this should be a top priority to address.

Mobility
Economy
Community Design
Education, Arts, and Culture
Inclusivity and Engagement
Health and Wellness
Utilities
Parks and Recreation
Natural Environment
Safety
57%
69%
70%
75%
77%
78%
78%
79%
71%
73%
69%
88%
78%
77%
76%
68%
85%
82%
88%
91%
Quality and Importance by the Numbers
The table below shows the proportion of residents who rated the community facets positively for quality and the priority (importance) placed on each. Also displayed is whether local quality ratings were lower, similar, or higher than communities across the country (the national benchmark).

Quality
% excellent or good
Importance
% essential or very important
Facet of
Livability
Safety Quality
Importance
Economy Quality
Importance
Natural Environment Quality
Importance
Utilities Quality
Importance
Parks and Recreation Quality
Importance
Community Design Quality
Importance
Education, Arts, and C.. Quality
Importance
Inclusivity and Engage.. Quality
Importance
Mobility Quality
Importance
Health and Wellness Quality
Importance
79%
91%
69%
88%
78%
88%
77%
85%
78%
82%
70%
78%
71%
77%
73%
76%
57%
69%
75%
68%
Quality/Importance Gap Analysis
The gap analysis chart below shows the same data as above; however, this chart more clearly illustrates the comparative differences in quality and importance ratings for each facet, as well as the absolute ratings for each.

Quality Importance
vs. national benchmark
Similar
vs. national benchmark
Higher Similar
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
418 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
39%
51%
9%
1%
The overall quality of life in Redlands, 2025
Quality of Life
Measuring community livability starts with
assessing the quality of life of those who live there,
and ensuring that the community is attractive,
accessible, and welcoming to all.
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Redlands as a place to live
The overall quality of life
Similar
Similar
89%85%
78% 91% 94%
79% 83%64%
88%
90%
Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Recommend living in Redlands to someone
who asks
Remain in Redlands for the next five years
Higher
Similar
85%
88%
72% 90% 93%
85%84% 86%77%
92%
Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following. (% very or somewhat likely)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Overall image or reputation Higher75%
61%
81% 83% 85%
Please rate each of the following in the Redlands community. (% excellent or good)

8. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. national
benchmark⁸
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
419 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
14%
40%
28%
18%
Overall confidence in Redlands government,
2025
Governance
Strong local governments produce results that
meet the needs of residents while making the best
use of available resources, and are responsive to
the present and future needs of the community as
a whole.

9. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 20212022 20232024 2025
The value of services for the taxes paid to
Redlands
The overall direction that Redlands is taking
The job Redlands government does at
welcoming resident involvement
Overall confidence in Redlands government
Generally acting in the best interest of the
community
Being honest
Being open and transparent to the public
Informing residents about issues facing the
community
Treating all residents fairly
Treating residents with respect
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
49%48%
41% 56%
58%
50%
49% 47%45%
58%
↗
45%
42%
33%
49% 52%
43%
40% 39%36%
54%
↗
45% 45%41%38%
51%
46%
42%
35%
49% 53%
42% 40%
38%36%
52%
↗
43%
40% 34%
48% 45%
↗
47% 55%
↗
Please rate the following categories of Redlands government performance. (% excellent or good)
20212022202320242025
-1 0 1 2
Public information services
Overall customer service by Redlands
employees
Similar
Similar
59%
61%
56% 55%
64%
↗
76%
74% 80%70%
83%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
The City of Redlands
The Federal Government
Overall,howwouldyouratethequalityoftheservicesprovidedbyeachofthefollowing? (%excellentorgood)
Attended a local public meeting
Contacted Redlands elected officials to
express your opinion
Contacted the City of Redlands for help or
information
Watched a local public meeting
Pleaseindicatewhetherornotyouhavedoneeachofthefollowinginthelast12months. (%yes)
vs. national
benchmark⁹
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
420 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
OverallconfidenceinRedlandsgovernment,
2025
Governance
Strong local governments produce results that
meet the needs of residents while making the best
use of available resources, and are responsive to
the present and future needs of the community as
a whole.

9. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. -1 0 1 2
The value of services for the taxes paid to
Redlands
The overall direction that Redlands is taking
The job Redlands government does at
welcoming resident involvement
Overall confidence in Redlands government
Generally acting in the best interest of the
community
Being honest
Being open and transparent to the public
Informing residents about issues facing the
community
Treating all residents fairly
Treating residents with respect
Similar
Similar
47%
46%45% 44%
55%
↗
56% 56% 57%48%
63%
PleaseratethefollowingcategoriesofRedlandsgovernmentperformance. (%excellentorgood)
Public information services
Overall customer service by Redlands
employees
PleaseratethequalityofeachofthefollowingservicesinRedlands. (%excellentorgood)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
The City of Redlands
The Federal Government
Similar
Similar
65%
66%
63% 58%
75%
↗
32%
39%
31% 30% 31%
Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? (% excellent or good)
20212022202320242025
-1 0 1 2
Attended a local public meeting
Contacted Redlands elected officials to
express your opinion
Contacted the City of Redlands for help or
information
Watched a local public meeting
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
21%
20%
18%
23% 22%
18%13%19%19% 18%
53%52% 60%50%
47%
↘
31% 31%
26%
33% 34%
Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes)
vs.national
benchmark⁹
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
421 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
10%
59%
25%
5%
Overall economic health of Redlands, 2025
Economy
Local governments work together with private and
nonprofit businesses, and with the community at large, to foster sustainable growth, create jobs, and promote a
thriving local economy.
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Redlands as a place to work
Redlands as a place to visit
Higher
Higher
70%70% 72%53%
78%
↗
75%65%68% 80% 79%
Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Overall quality of business and service
establishments
Variety of business and service
establishments
Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area
Employment opportunities
Shopping opportunities
Cost of living
Higher
Higher
81%70%
84% 85% 83%
70%61%
72%
72%
72%
Please rate each of the following in the Redlands community. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Economic development
Similar52%53% 51% 51%
55%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
What impact, if any, do you think the
economy will have on your family
income in the next 6 months? Do you
think the impact will be:

What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:
(% very or somewhat positive)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Overall economic health
Similar64%64% 53% 68% 69%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Redlands as a whole. (% excellent or good)

11. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. national
benchmark¹⁰
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
422 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
OveralleconomichealthofRedlands,2025
Economy
Local governments work together with private and
nonprofit businesses, and with the community at large, to foster sustainable growth, create jobs, and promote a
thriving local economy.

Redlands as a place to work
Redlands as a place to visit
PleaserateeachofthefollowingaspectsofqualityoflifeinRedlands. (%excellentorgood)
-1 0 1 2
Overall quality of business and service
establishments
Variety of business and service
establishments
Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area
Employment opportunities
Shopping opportunities
Cost of living
Much higher
Similar
Much higher
Similar
74% 75%59%
77%
81%
38% 41%
51%52% 47%
72% 72%57%
76%
76%
27%28% 28%
20%
32%
PleaserateeachofthefollowingintheRedlandscommunity.
(%excellentorgood)
Economic development
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
What impact, if any, do you think the
economy will have on your family
income in the next 6 months? Do you
think the impact will be:

Similar18%
22%
26%
15%
19%
What impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:
(% very or somewhat positive)
Overall economic health
PleaserateeachofthefollowingcharacteristicsastheyrelatetoRedlandsasawhole. (%excellentorgood)

11. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs.national
benchmark¹⁰
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
423 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
20%
38%
34%
9%
Overall quality of the transportation system in
Redlands, 2025
Mobility
The ease with which residents can move about
their communities, whether for commuting,
leisure, or recreation, plays a major role in the
quality of life for all who live, work, and play in
the community.

11. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. .
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Traffic flow on major streets
Ease of public parking
Ease of travel by car
Ease of travel by public transportation
Ease of travel by bicycle
Ease of walking
Similar
Similar
Similar
Higher
Much higher
Higher
53%52%
54%
47% 59%
43%
41%
36%
54% 56%
71% 78%70%68% 83%
36%
32%
27%
25%
50%
↗
71% 81%64%63%
78%
69%
68%59%
78%
75%
Please also rate each of the following in the Redlands community. (% excellent or good)
Used public transportation instead of
driving
Carpooled with other adults or children
instead of driving alone
Walked or biked instead of driving
Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes)
Traffic enforcement
Traffic signal timing
Street repair
Street cleaning
Street lighting
Sidewalk maintenance
Bus or transit services
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Overall quality of the transportation
system
Similar54%43%48% 58% 57%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Redlands as a whole. (% excellent or good)
vs. national
benchmark¹¹
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
424 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Overallqualityofthetransportationsystemin
Redlands,2025
Mobility
The ease with which residents can move about
their communities, whether for commuting,
leisure, or recreation, plays a major role in the
quality of life for all who live, work, and play in
the community.

11. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. .

Traffic flow on major streets
Ease of public parking
Ease of travel by car
Ease of travel by public transportation
Ease of travel by bicycle
Ease of walking
PleasealsorateeachofthefollowingintheRedlandscommunity. (%excellentorgood)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Used public transportation instead of
driving
Carpooled with other adults or children
instead of driving alone
Walked or biked instead of driving
Similar
Similar
Similar
24%17%
13%
29%
23%
60%48%
50% 61% 56%
61% 61% 58%65%
63%
Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Traffic enforcement
Traffic signal timing
Street repair
Street cleaning
Street lighting
Sidewalk maintenance
Bus or transit services
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Higher
52%
48%
52%53% 49%
51%
55%
49%49% 53%
51%
52%
41% 45%
55%
64%
64%
61%
54%
72%
↗
60% 60%
58%55%
62%
46%
45% 50%
40% 53%
46%
42%
36%
51% 53%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
Overall quality of the transportation
system
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Redlands as a whole. (% excellent or good)
vs.national
benchmark¹¹
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
425 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
15%
56%
22%
8%
Overall design or layout of Redlands's residential
and commercial areas, 2025
Community Design
A well-designed community enhances the
quality of life for its residents by
encouraging smart land use and zoning,
ensuring that affordable housing is
accessible to all, and providing access to
parks and other green spaces.

12. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Well-planned residential growth
Well-planned commercial growth
Well-designed neighborhoods
Preservation of the historical or cultural
character of the community
Public places where people want to spend
time
Variety of housing options
Availability of affordable quality housing
Overall quality of new development
Overall appearance
Similar
Similar
Similar
Much higher
41%
31%
45%
45% 47%
41%
41% 39%
34%
47%
54%
44%
59%
61%
59%
76%61%
81% 81%
87%
69%
Please also rate each of the following in the Redlands community. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Your neighborhood as a place to live
Similar81%67%
87%88% 85%
Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
Land use, planning and zoning
Code enforcement
PleaseratethequalityofeachofthefollowingservicesinRedlands. (%excellentorgood)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Overall design or layout of residential and
commercial areas
Similar60%59% 71%58%
70%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Redlands as a whole. (% excellent or good)
vs. national
benchmark¹²
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
426 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall design or layout of Redlands's residential
and commercial areas, 2025
Community Design
A well-designed community enhances the
quality of life for its residents by
encouraging smart land use and zoning,
ensuring that affordable housing is
accessible to all, and providing access to
parks and other green spaces.

12. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. -1 0 1 2
Well-planned residential growth
Well-planned commercial growth
Well-designed neighborhoods
Preservation of the historical or cultural
character of the community
Public places where people want to spend
time
Variety of housing options
Availability of affordable quality housing
Overall quality of new development
Overall appearance
Higher
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
54%
69%70% 72% 69%
38%
37%
36%
34%
48%
↗
19% 17%17% 23%
50%
44%
53%
42% 47%
61%
77% 77% 79% 78%
Please alsorate eachofthe followinginthe Redlands community. (% excellentor good)
Your neighborhood as a place to live
Please rate eachofthe followingaspects ofquality oflife inRedlands. (% excellentor good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Land use, planning and zoning
Code enforcement
Similar
Similar
39%
40%
37%34% 46%
↗
33%
32% 39%30%
41%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
Overall design or layout of residential and
commercial areas
Please rate eachofthe followingcharacteristics as they relate toRedlands as a whole. (% excellentor good)
vs.national
benchmark¹²
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
427 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
26%
51%
18%
5%
Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in
Redlands, 2025
Utilities
Services such as water, gas, electricity, and
internet access play a vital role in ensuring the
physical and economic health and well-being
of the communities they serve.

13. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Affordable high-speed internet access
Garbage collection
Drinking water
Sewer services
Storm water management
Power (electric and/or gas) utility
Utility billing
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
51%
52%46%
43%
63%
↗
81%
80%84% 77%
81%
63% 62%
60%60%
76%
↗
80% 81% 79%78%
83%
73%67%66%66% 79%
68% 69%
65% 60%
76%
↗
57%
54%
60%
50%
64%
↗
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Overall quality of the utility infrastructure
Similar66%64%62%
61%
77%
↗
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Redlands as a whole. (% excellent or good) vs. national
benchmark¹³
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
428 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
31%
48%
19%
1%
Overall feeling of safety in Redlands, 2025
Safety
Public safety is often the most important task
facing local governments. All residents should feel
safe and secure in their neighborhoods and in the
greater community, and providing robust
safety-related services is essential to residents'
quality of life.
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Overall feeling of safety Similar
65% 67%
43%
74%
79%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Redlands as a whole. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
In your neighborhood during the
day
In Redlands's
downtown/commercial area during
the day
From property crime
From violent crime
From fire, flood, or other natural
disaster
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
91%91%
93%85%
98%
82%
69%
85%86% 90%
62%63%
45%
69%
68%
72%77% 78%
57%
88%
↗
62%
76% 77%78% 69%
Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel:
(% very or somewhat safe)
Police services
Crime prevention
Animal control
Ambulance or emergency medical
services
Fire services
Fire prevention and education
Emergency preparedness
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)

14. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. national
benchmark¹⁴
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
429 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
OverallfeelingofsafetyinRedlands,2025
Safety
Public safety is often the most important task
facing local governments. All residents should feel
safe and secure in their neighborhoods and in the
greater community, and providing robust
safety-related services is essential to residents'
quality of life.

Overall feeling of safety
PleaserateeachofthefollowingcharacteristicsastheyrelatetoRedlandsasawhole. (%excellentorgood)
In your neighborhood during the
day
In Redlands's
downtown/commercial area during
the day
From property crime
From violent crime
From fire, flood, or other natural
disaster
Pleaseratehowsafeorunsafeyoufeel:
(%veryorsomewhatsafe)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Police services
Crime prevention
Animal control
Ambulance or emergency medical
services
Fire services
Fire prevention and education
Emergency preparedness
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
72%
63% 67%
74% 76%
58%
40%
61%
62% 67%
62%
76%
59%59%
68%
82%
91%77%77%
81%
↘
94%
91%
87%87%
87%
72%73%
62%
78%
76%
53%
53% 43%
58%
57%
↗
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)

14. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs.national
benchmark¹⁴
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
430 of 932
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
30%
48%
20%
2%
Overall quality of natural environment in
Redlands, 2024
Natural Environment
The natural environment plays a vital role in the health and well-being of residents. The natural spaces in which residents live and experience their communities has a
direct and profound effect on quality of life. 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 -1 0 1 2
Cleanliness
Water resources
Air quality
Similar
Much lower
Much lower
64%
67%
50% 67% 72%
34%
41%
43%
40%40% 41%
Please also rate each of the following in the Redlands community. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Preservation of natural areas
Redlands open space
Recycling
Yard waste pick-up
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
57%
55%49%
61%
59%
54% 62%
51%
50%
52%
↘
61%
56%
47% 69%
71%
73% 72%
78%
81% 6
↘
5%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands.(% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Overall quality of natural environment
Similar72% 72%62% 76% 78%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Redlands as a whole. (% excellent or good)

15. Com
parison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. national
ben
chmark¹⁵

15. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
431 of 932
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
33%
44%
18%
5%
Overall quality of parks and recreation
opportunities, 2025
Parks and Recreation
"There are no communities that pride themselves on
their quality of life, promote themselves as a
desirable location for businesses to relocate, or
maintain that they are environmental stewards of
their natural resources, without such communities
having a robust, active system of parks and
recreation programs for public use and enjoyment."
- National Recreation and Park Association
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Availability of paths and walking trails
Fitness opportunities
Recreational opportunities
Similar
Similar
Similar
72% 77%
63%
61%
70%
70% 70%77%68% 81%
64%64%60% 70%
69%
Please also rate each of the following in the Redlands community. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
City parks
Recreation programs or classes
Recreation centers or facilities
Similar
Similar
Similar
70%65%
58% 74% 75%
67%66%
59% 72% 71%
64%
54% 68% 71% 71%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Overall quality of parks and recreation
opportunities
Similar68%65%58% 74% 78%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Redlands as a whole. (% excellent or good)

16. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. national
benchmark¹⁶
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
432 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
30%
46%
21%
4%
Overall health and wellness opportunities in
Redlands, 2025
Health and Wellness
The characteristics of and amenities available
in the communities in which people live has a
direct impact on the health and wellness of
residents, and thus, on their quality of life
overall.
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Availability of affordable quality food
Availability of affordable quality health
care
Availability of preventive health
services
Availability of affordable quality
mental health care
Similar
Similar
Similar
Higher
57%
68%
55% 55%
59%
55% 57%47%
60% 60%
52% 50% 49%
61% 63%
↗
44%
46% 40%
31%
57%
↗
Please also rate each of the following in the Redlands community. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Health services Similar
53% 62%
70% 71% 72%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
Please rate your overall health.

Please rate your overallhealth.
(% excellentor very good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Overall health and wellness
opportunities
Similar69%
68%57% 74% 75%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Redlands as a whole. (% excellent or good)

17. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. national
benchmark¹⁷
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
433 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Overall health and wellness opportunities in
Redlands, 2025
Health and Wellness
The characteristics of and amenities available
in the communities in which people live has a
direct impact on the health and wellness of
residents, and thus, on their quality of life
overall.

Availability of affordable quality food
Availability of affordable quality health
care
Availability of preventive health
services
Availability of affordable quality
mental health care
Please alsorate eachofthe followinginthe Redlands community. (% excellentor good)
Health services
Please rate the quality ofeachofthe followingservices inRedlands. (% excellentor good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Please rate your overall health.

Similar69% 68% 67%67%
76%
↗
Please rate your overall health.
(% excellent or very good)
Overall health and wellness
opportunities
Please rate eachofthe followingcharacteristics as they relate toRedlands as a whole. (% excellentor good)

17. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs.national
benchmark¹⁷
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
434 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
39%
33%
24%
5%
Overall opportunities for education,
culture and the arts, 2025
Education, Arts, and Culture
Participation in the arts, in educational opportunities, and in cultural activities is linked to increased civic
engagement, greater social tolerance, and enhanced
enjoyment of the local community. 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 -1 0 1 2
Opportunities to attend
cultural/arts/music activities
Community support for the arts
Availability of affordable quality
childcare/preschool
K-12 education
Adult educational opportunities
Opportunities to attend special
events and festivals
Much higher
Higher
Similar
Similar
Higher
Similar
75%71% 78%
62%
83%
76%
59%
77% 79%
81%
47%
36%
48%50% 44%
69%
75%
73%68% 69%
58%
57%46%
66% 69%
↗
71% 73%61% 79%
74%
Please also rate each of the following in the Redlands community. (% excellent or good)
Public library services
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Overall opportunities for education,
culture, and the arts
Higher70%
58%
72% 74%
71%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Redlands as a whole. (% excellent or good)

18. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. national
benchmark¹⁸
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
435 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Overallopportunitiesforeducation,
cultureandthearts,2025
Education,Arts,andCulture
Participation in the arts, in educational opportunities, and in cultural activities is linked to increased civic
engagement, greater social tolerance, and enhanced
enjoyment of the local community.

Opportunities to attend
cultural/arts/music activities
Community support for the arts
Availability of affordable quality
childcare/preschool
K-12 education
Adult educational opportunities
Opportunities to attend special
events and festivals
PleasealsorateeachofthefollowingintheRedlandscommunity. (%excellentorgood)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Public library services Similar81%
87%
70% 93% 88%
Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
Overall opportunities for education,
culture, and the arts
PleaserateeachofthefollowingcharacteristicsastheyrelatetoRedlandsasawhole. (%excellentorgood)

18. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs.national
benchmark¹⁸
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
436 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
26%
47%
18%
9%
Residents' connection and engagement with
their community, 2025
Inclusivity and Engagement
Inclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental
feeling of belonging; residents who feel invited to
participate within their communities feel more
included, involved, and engaged than those who do
not.
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Redlands as a place to raise
children
Redlands as a place to retire
Sense of community
Similar
Similar
Higher
83%
69% 88% 88% 92%
67%62%
55%
71% 74%
70%53%
61% 74%
77%
Please rate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Redlands. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Residents' connection and engagement
with their community
Higher63%58%
50% 70% 73%
Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Redlands as a whole. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Making all residents feel welcome
Attracting people from diverse
backgrounds
Valuing/respecting residents from
diverse backgrounds
Taking care of vulnerable residents
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
66%58% 68%
60% 69%
54%58%53%51% 63%
↗
58%61%52%
52%
65%
45%
49%
44%
42%
55%
↗
Please rate the job you feel the Redlands community does at each of the following. (% excellent or good)
Sense of civic/community pride
Neighborliness of residents
Opportunities to participate in social
events and activities
Opportunities to volunteer
Opportunities to participate in
community matters
Openness and acceptance of the
community toward people of diverse
backgrounds
Please also rate each of the following in the Redlands community. (% excellent or good)
Campaigned or advocated for a local
issue, cause, or candidate
Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes)

19. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs. national
benchmark¹⁹
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
437 of 932
Excellent
Good
Fair
Poor
Residents' connection and engagement with
their community, 2025
Inclusivity and Engagement
Inclusivity refers to a cultural and environmental
feeling of belonging; residents who feel invited to
participate within their communities feel more
included, involved, and engaged than those who do
not.

Redlands as a place to raise
children
Redlands as a place to retire
Sense of community
Please rate eachofthe followingaspects ofquality oflife inRedlands. (% excellentor good)
Residents' connection and engagement
with their community
Please rate eachofthe followingcharacteristics as they relate toRedlands as a whole. (% excellentor good)
-1 0 1 2
Making all residents feel welcome
Attracting people from diverse
backgrounds
Valuing/respecting residents from
diverse backgrounds
Taking care of vulnerable residents
Please rate the jobyoufeelthe Redlands community does ateachofthe following. (% excellentor good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Sense of civic/community pride
Neighborliness of residents
Opportunities to participate in social
events and activities
Opportunities to volunteer
Opportunities to participate in
community matters
Openness and acceptance of the
community toward people of diverse
backgrounds
Higher
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
Similar
69%64%
55%
74%
79%
61%
59%51%
68% 66%
69% 71% 71%60%
77%
74% 75%66%
68% 77%
62%
63% 61%
55%
69%
54%
51%47%
62%
59%
Please also rate each of the following in the Redlands community. (% excellent or good)
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
-1 0 1 2
Campaigned or advocated for a local
issue, cause, or candidate SimilarSimilar
22%
22%
12% 16%
24% 22%
22%
12% 16%
24%
Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months. (% yes)

19. Comparison to the national benchmark is shown. If no comparison is available, this is left blank. vs.national
benchmark¹⁹
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
438 of 932
Before today, had you heard about any work by
the City of Redlands to help people experiencing
homelessness in the last two years?
No
Yes
To what extent do you think the City's efforts to
support people experiencing homelessness have
been successful?
Very successful
Somewhat successful
Somewhat unsuccessful
Very unsuccessful
Don't Know
Please rate how
important, if at all,
you think it is for
the City of
Redlands to
implement each of
the following to
help address
homelessness.

Providing emergency shelter Essential
Very important
Somewhat important
Not at all important
Providing transitional housing, which is available
for a limited period, and offers structure,
supervision, addiction and mental health support,
life skills, and in some cases, education and
training
Essential
Very important
Somewhat important
Not at all important
Creating affordable, permanent housing Essential
Very important
Somewhat important
Not at all important
Enforcing "no camping" ordinances in public parks
and rights of way
Essential
Very important
Somewhat important
Not at all important
Providing access to healthcare and substance
abuse treatment
Essential
Very important
Somewhat important
Not at all important
Continuing to help fund organizations that provide
services to people experiencing homelessness in
the Redlands Community
Essential
Very important
Somewhat important
Not at all important
IftheCitywereto
commitadditional
resources,please
indicatehowmuch
ofapriority,ifatall,
eachofthe
followingwouldbe.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion Major priority
Minor priority
Not a priority
Downtown parking Major priority
Minor priority
Not a priority
Homelessness Major priority
Minor priority
Not a priority
Public safety (police & fire) Major priority
Minor priority
Not a priority
Quality of life (parks, recreation, library & cultural
amenities)
Major priority
Minor priority
Not a priority
Sustainability and climate change Major priority
Minor priority
Not a priority
Please indicate which one of the following should
be the top priority for the City.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion
Downtown parking
Homelessness
Public safety (police & fire)
Quality of life (parks, recreation,
library & cultural amenities)
Sustainability and climate
change
35%
65%
15%
17%
14%
47%
7%
1%
24%
33%
41%
3%
23%
36%
37%
8%
18%
31%
43%
4%
8%
26%
62%
1%
15%
34%
50%
4%
26%
27%
43%
Custom questions
Below are the complete set of responses to each custom question on the survey. By default, “don’t know” responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter below.

Include "don't know"
No
27%
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
439 of 932
Before today, had you heard about any work by
the City of Redlands to help people experiencing
homelessness in the last two years?
No
Yes
To what extent do you think the City's efforts to
support people experiencing homelessness have
been successful?
Very successful
Somewhat successful
Somewhat unsuccessful
Very unsuccessful
Don't Know
Pleaseratehow
important,ifatall,
youthinkitisfor
theCityof
Redlandsto
implementeachof
thefollowingto
helpaddress
homelessness.

Providing emergency shelter Essential
Very important
Somewhat important
Not at all important
Providing transitional housing, which is available
for a limited period, and offers structure,
supervision, addiction and mental health support,
life skills, and in some cases, education and
training
Essential
Very important
Somewhat important
Not at all important
Creating affordable, permanent housing Essential
Very important
Somewhat important
Not at all important
Enforcing "no camping" ordinances in public parks
and rights of way
Essential
Very important
Somewhat important
Not at all important
Providing access to healthcare and substance
abuse treatment
Essential
Very important
Somewhat important
Not at all important
Continuing to help fund organizations that provide
Essential
Very important
Somewhat important
Not at all important
If the City were to
commit additional
resources, please
indicate how much
of a priority, if at all,
each of the
following would be.

Diversity, equity, and inclusion
Downtown parking
Homelessness
Public safety (police & fire)
Quality of life (parks, recreation,
library & cultural amenities)
Sustainability and climate
change
4%
26%
43%
26%
38%
36%
21%
41%
38%
3%
28%
70%
3%
26%
71%
6%
39%
55%
18%
46%
36%
4%
19%
29%
36%
3%
9%
Customquestions
Below are the complete set of responses to each custom question on the survey. By default, “don’t know” responses are excluded, but may be added to the table using the response filter below.

Include "don't know"
No
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
440 of 932
Please complete this survey if you are an adult (age 18 or older) in the household. Your responses are confidential and no identifying information will be shared.

1. P lease r ate each of the following aspects of quality of life in Redlands.

Ex cellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know
q1a Redlands as a place to live ................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q1b Your neighborhood as a place to live .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q1c Redlands as a place to raise children .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q1d Redlands as a place to work ................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q1e Redlands as a place to visit .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q1f Redlands as a place to retire ............................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q1g The overall quality of life in Redlands ............................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q1h Sense of community ................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5

2. Please rate each of the following characteristics as they relate to Redlands a s a whole.

Ex cellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know
q2a Overall economic health of Redlands .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q2b Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in R edlands ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q2c Overall design or layout of Redlands’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, buildings, streets, parks, etc.) ............................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q2d Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Redlands ........................................... (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) ..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q2e Overall feeling of safety in Redlands ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q2f Overall quality of natural environment in Redlands ................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q2g Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q2h Overall health and wellness opportunities in Redlands ......................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q2i Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q2j Residents’ connection and engagement with their community .......................... 1 2 3 4 5

3. Please indicate how likely or unlikely you are to do each of the following.

Ve ry Somewhat Somewhat Very Don’t
likely likely unlikely unlikely know
q3a Recommend living in Redlands to someone who asks ......................1 2 3 4 5 q3b Remain in Redlands for the next five years ............................................1 2 3 4 5

4. Please rate how safe or unsafe you feel:

Ve ry Somewhat Neither safe Somewhat Very Don’t
safe safe nor unsafe unsafe unsafe know
q4a In your neighborhood during the day ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 q4b In Redlands’s downtown/commercial area
dur ing the day .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 6 q4c From property crime ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 q4d From violent crime ........................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 6 q4e From fire, flood, or other natural disaster ............................. 1 2 3 4 5 6

5. Please rate the job you feel the Redlands c ommunity does at each of the following.

Ex cellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know
q5a Making all residents feel welcome ................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q5b Attracting people from diverse backgrounds .............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q5c Valuing/respecting residents from diverse backgrounds ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q5d Taking care of vulnerable residents (elderly, disabled, homeless, etc.) ........... 1 2 3 4 5

6. Please rate each of the following i n the Redlands community.

Ex cellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know
q6a Overall quality of business and service establishments in Redlands ................ 1 2 3 4 5 q6b Variety of business and service establishments in Redlands ............................... 1 2 3 4 5 q6c Vibrancy of downtown/commercial area ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q6d Employment opportunities ................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q6e Shopping opportunities ........................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q6f Cost of living in Redlands ..................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q6g Overall image or reputation of Redlands ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
441 of 932

7. Please also rate each of the following in the Redlands community.

Ex cellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know
q7a Traffic flow on major streets ............................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7b Ease of public parking ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7c Ease of travel by car in Redlands ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7d Ease of travel by public transportation in Redlands ................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7e Ease of travel by bicycle in Redlands .............................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q7f Ease of walking in Redlands ................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7g Well-planned residential growth ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7h Well-planned commercial growth .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7i Well-designed neighborhoods ........................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7j Preservation of the historical or cultural character of the community ............ 1 2 3 4 5 q7k Public places where people want to spend time ........................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7l Variety of housing options ................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7m Availability of affordable quality housing ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7n Overall quality of new development in Redlands ...................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7o Overall appearance of Redlands ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7p Cleanliness of Redlands ......................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7q Water resources (beaches, lakes, ponds, riverways, etc.) ..................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7r Air quality .................................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7s Availability of paths and walking trails .......................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7t Fitness opportunities (including exercise classes and paths or trails, etc.) ... 1 2 3 4 5 q7u Recreational opportunities .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q7v Availability of affordable quality food ............................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7w Availability of affordable quality health care ............................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7x Availability of preventive health services ..................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7y Availability of affordable quality mental health care ............................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7z Opportunities to attend cultural/arts/music activities .......................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7aa Community support for the arts ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7bb Availability of affordable quality childcare/preschool ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7cc K-12 education .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7dd Adult educational opportunities ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7ee Sense of civic/community pride ........................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7ff Neighborliness of residents in Redlands ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7gg Opportunities to participate in social events and activities .................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q7hh Opportunities to attend special events and festivals ............................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q7ii Opportunities to volunteer .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q7jj Opportunities to participate in community matters ................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q7kk Openness and acceptance of the community toward people of diverse backgrounds ................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5

8. Please indicate whether or not you have done each of the following in the last 12 months.

No Yes
q8a Contacted the City of Redlands (in-person, phone, email, or web) for help or information ............................ 1 2 q8b Contacted Redlands elected officials (in-person, phone, email, or web) to express your opinion ................ 1 2 q8c Attended a local public meeting (of local elected officials like City Council or County Supervisors, advisory boards, town halls, HOA, neighborhood watch, etc.) .................................................... 1 2 q8d Watched (online or on television) a local public meeting ............................................................................................... 1 2 q8e Volunteered your time to some group/activity in Redlands ......................................................................................... 1 2 q8f Campaigned or advocated for a local issue, cause, or candidate .................................................................................. 1 2 q8g Voted in your most recent local election ................................................................................................................................ 1 2 q8h Used bus, rail, or other public transportation instead of driving ................................................................................. 1 2 q8i Carpooled with other adults or children instead of driving alone .............................................................................. 1 2 q8j Walked or biked instead of driving ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
442 of 932

9. Please rate the quality of each of the following services in Redlands.

Ex cellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know
q9a Public information services ............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9b Economic development ..................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9c Traffic enforcement ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q9d Traffic signal timing ............................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q9e Street repair ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9f Street cleaning ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9g Street lighting ........................................................................................................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q9i Sidewalk maintenance ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9j Bus or transit services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9k Land use, planning, and zoning ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9l Code enforcement (weeds, abandoned buildings, etc.) ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9m Affordable high-speed internet access ....................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9n Garbage collection ............................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9o Drinking water ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9p Sewer services ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9q Storm water management (storm drainage, dams, levees, etc.) .................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9r Power (electric and/or gas) utility ............................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9s Utility billing .......................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9t Police services ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9u Crime prevention ................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9v Animal control ....................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9w Ambulance or emergency medical services ............................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9x Fire services ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9y Fire prevention and education ....................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9z Emergency preparedness (services that prepare the community for natural disasters or other emergency situations) ................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9aa Preservation of natural areas (open space, farmlands, and greenbelts) ..... 1 2 3 4 5 q9bb Redlands open space .......................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9cc Recycling .................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9dd Yard waste pick-up.............................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9ee City parks................................................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q9ff Recreation programs or classes .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9gg Recreation centers or facilities ...................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9hh Health services ...................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9ii Public library services ....................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q9jj Overall customer service by Redlands employees
(police, receptionists, planners, etc.) ................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5

10. Please rate the following categories of Redlands go vernment performance.

Ex cellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know
q10a The value of services for the taxes paid to Redlands ............................................ 1 2 3 4 5 q10b The overall direction that Redlands is taking .......................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q10c The job Redlands government does at welcoming resident involvement ........ 1 2 3 4 5 q10d Overall confidence in Redlands government ........................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q10e Generally acting in the best interest of the community ...................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q10f Being honest ........................................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q10g Being open and transparent to the public ................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q10h Informing residents about issues facing the community ................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q10i Treating all residents fairly ............................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 q10j Treating residents with respect .................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5

11. Overall, how would you rate the quality of the services provided by each of the following? Ex cellent Good Fair Poor Don’t know
q11a The City of Redlands ........................................................................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 q11b The Federal Government .................................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
443 of 932

12. Please rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the Redlands community to focus on each of the following in the coming two years.

Ve ry Somewhat Not at all
Essential important important important
q12a Overall economic health of Redlands .................................................................................1 2 3 4 q12b Overall quality of the transportation system (auto, bicycle, foot, bus) in R edlands ..............................................................................................................................1 2 3 4 q12c Overall design or layout of Redlands’s residential and commercial areas (e.g., homes, bu ildings, streets, parks, etc.) ..................................................1 2 3 4 q12d Overall quality of the utility infrastructure in Redlands (water, sewer, storm water, electric/gas, broadband) .......................................1 2 3 4 q12e Overall feeling of safety in Redlands ..................................................................................1 2 3 4 q12f Overall quality of natural environment in Redlands ...................................................1 2 3 4 q12g Overall quality of parks and recreation opportunities ...............................................1 2 3 4 q12h Overall health and wellness opportunities in Redlands ............................................1 2 3 4 q12i Overall opportunities for education, culture, and the arts........................................1 2 3 4 q12j Residents’ connection and engagement with their community .............................1 2 3 4

13. B
efore today, had you heard about any work by the City of Redlands to help people experiencing homelessness in the last two years?
 No  skip to 15
 Yes  continue to 14

14. To w
hat extent do you think the City’s efforts to support people experiencing homelessness have been successful?
 Very successful
 Somewhat successful
 Somewhat unsuccessful
 Very unsuccessful
 Don’t know

15. Ple
ase rate how important, if at all, you think it is for the City of Redlands to implement each of the following to help address homelessness.

Very Somewhat Not at all Don’t
Essential important important important know
Providing emergency shelter .................................................................................. 1 2 3 4 5 Providing transitional housing, which is available for a limited period, and offers structure, supervision, addiction and mental health support, life skills, and in some cases, education and training ............... 1 2 3 4 5 Creating affordable, permanent housing .. ......................................................... 1 2 3 4 5 Enforcing “no camping” ordinances in public parks and rights of way ... 1 2 3 4 5 Providing access to healthcare and substance abuse treatment .. ........... 1 2 3 4 5 Continuing to help fund organizations that provide services to people experiencing homelessness in the Redlands Community ....... 1 2 3 4 5

16. First, if the City were to commit additional resources, please indicate how much of a priority, if at all, each of th
e following would be. Then, please indicate which ONE of the following should be the top priority for the City.

Maj or Minor Not a Don’t Top
prio rity priority priority know priority
Diversity, equity, and inclusion.. ...................................................1 2 3 4  Downtown parking ............................................................................1 2 3 4  Homelessness .......................................................................................1 2 3 4  Public safety (police & fire) ............................................................1 2 3 4  Quality of life (parks, recreation, library & cultural
a menities) .........................................................................................1 2 3 4  Sustainability and climate change ...............................................1 2 3 4  Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
444 of 932
Our last questions are about you and your household.

Again, all of your responses to this survey are confidential and no identifying information will be shared.

D1. I n general, how many times do you: Several Once A few times Every Less often Don’t times a day a day a week few weeks or never know
d1a Access the internet from your home using
a computer, laptop, or tablet computer ....................1 2 3 4 5 6 d1b Access the internet from your cell phone .......................1 2 3 4 5 6 d1c Visit social media sites such as Facebook,
X (formerly Twitter), Nextdoor, etc. ..........................1 2 3 4 5 6 d1d Use or check email ....................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 d1e Share your opinions online ...................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 d1f Shop online ..................................................................................1 2 3 4 5 6 D2. P lease rate your overall health.
1  Excellent 2  Very good 3  Good 4  Fair 5  Poor D3. W hat impact, if any, do you think the economy will have on your family income in the next 6 months? Do you think the impact will be:
1  Very positive 2  Somewhat positive 3  Neutral 4  Somewhat negative 5  Very negative D4. H ow many years have you lived in
Redlands?
1  Less than 2 years
2  2-5 years
3  6-10 years
4  11-20 years
5  More than 20 years
D5. W hich best describes the building you live
in?
1  Single-family detached home
2  Townhouse or duplex (may share walls but
no units above or below you)
3  Condominium or apartment (have units
above or below you)
4  Mobile home
5  Other
D6. D o you rent or own your home?
1  Rent
2  Own
D7. A bout how much is your monthly housing
cost for the place you live (including rent,
mortgage payment, property tax, property
insurance, and homeowners’ association
(HOA) fees)?
1  Less than $300 6  $2,500 to $3,999
2  $300 to $599 7  $4,000 to $6,999
3  $600 to $999 8  $7,000 to $9,999
4  $1,000 to $1,499 9  $10,000 or more
5  $1,500 to $2,499
D8. D o any children 17 or under live in your
household?
1  No 2  Yes
D9. A re you or any other members of your
household aged 65 or older?
1  No 2  Yes

D10. How much do you anticipate your household’s total
income before taxes will be for the current year?
(Please include in your total income money from all
sources for all persons living in your household.)
1  Less than $25,000 5  $100,000 to $149,999
2  $25,000 to $49,999 6  $150,000 to $199,999
3  $50,000 to $74,999 7  $200,000 to $299,999
4  $75,000 to $99,999 8  $300,000 or more
D11. Are you of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or Spanish origin? 1  No 2  Yes
D12. W hat is your race? (Mark one or more races to
indicate what race you consider yourself to be.)
d12a  American Indian or Alaskan Native
d12b  Asian
d12c  Black or African American
d12d  Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
d12e  White
d12f  A race not listed
D13. I n which category is your age?
1  18-24 years 5  55-64 years
2  25-34 years 6  65-74 years
3  35-44 years 7  75 years or older
4  45-54 years
D14. What is your gender?
1  Woman
2  Man
3  Identify in another way  go to D14a
D14a. I f you identify in another way, how would you
describe your gender?
1  Agender/I don’t identify with any gender
2  Genderqueer/gender fluid
3  Non-binary
4  Transgender man
5  Transgender woman
6  Two-spirit
7  Identify in another way
Thank you! Please return the completed survey in the postage-paid envelope to:

National Research Center, Inc., PO Box 14050, Houston, TX 77221-9904 Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
445 of 932
City Council Meeting J. 2.

DATE: 11/18/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Discussion and possible action relating to the formation of, and appointments to, an Ad Hoc Committee of the City Council to review all applications for the Planning Commission and to interview Planning Commission candidates (Mayor Saucedo) MOTION:

If the City Council concurs with Mayor Saucedo's recommendation, the following motions are provided.

I move to approve the formation of an Ad Hoc Committee of the City Council to review all applications for the Planning Commission and to interview Planning Commission candidates.

1. I further move to appoint _______________________________ and ___________________________ to the Ad Hoc Committee.

2. RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended by Mayor Saucedo that the City Council form an Ad Hoc Committee of the City Council to review all applications for the Planning Commission and to interview Planning Commission candidates, and appoint two Council members to the committee.

DISCUSSION:

In accordance with Resolution No. 8674, the Mayor shall appoint an ad-hoc subcommittee at a regularly scheduled City Council meeting, and said committee shall consist of two (2) Council members, with approval of a majority of Council members present. The ad-hoc subcommittee shall review all complete applications that are received prior to the published date and time deadline for a commission vacancy. Applicants may not submit additional information after the filing deadline, nor may members of the ad-hoc Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
446 of 932
subcommittee or City staff request additional information or materials after the filing deadline. Furthermore, the ad-hoc subcommittee shall report its findings and recommendations to the City Council in a regular public City Council meeting. Consensus by the ad- hoc subcommittee is not required for consideration of an applicant by the full City Council.

The Ad Hoc Committee will not be subject to the Brown Act as it will be limited in scope and duration. Once the City Council reviews the work of the committee and the matter is finalized, the Ad Hoc Committee will automatically dissolve.

SUBMITTED BY:

Mayor Saucedo

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
447 of 932
City Council Meeting K. 1.

DATE: 11/18/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to consider Ordinance No. 2993- Ordinance Text Amendment No. 370 to update the development standards and design regulations contained in Redlands Municipal Code Chapter

18.156, Article VII, pertaining to the construction of accessory dwelling units. This proposal qualifies for exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15282(h) of the CEQA Guidelines.
(Development Services Director Desatnik)
(Mayor to declare meeting open as a public hearing)
PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC HEARING:

Mayor declares the meeting open as a public hearing.1.

Mayor calls upon Department Director for report.2.

Mayor calls for questions/comments from members of the City Council.

3. Mayor calls for comments/questions/testimony from members of the public
(3 minutes per speaker).

4. Mayor calls upon City Clerk to note any written comments received.

5. Mayor closes the public hearing.6.

City Council considers the motion and votes.7.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
448 of 932
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff’s recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

“I move to introduce Ordinance No. 2993.”
RECOMMENDATION:

The Planning Commission reviewed the draft ordinance in a public hearing held on October 14, 2025, and unanimously recommended that the City Council approve the proposed ordinance. The Commission discussed various aspects of the development standards, and recommended maintaining the current maximum allowable size of 1,200 square feet for an accessory dwelling unit in the city's Zoning Regulations.

BACKGROUND:

The adoption of an ordinance updating the City's zoning regulation to align with current State law will implement Program No. 1.6-3 of the City’s certified 2021-2029 Housing Element. The revised regulations are intended to help facilitate more Accessory Dwelling Unit ("ADU") production by making the permitting process easier, faster, and more affordable for developers or homeowners who wish to build an ADU.

In recent years, the State Legislature has adopted numerous bills updating the land use regulations pertaining to the construction of new housing, and particularly affordable housing, in an effort to make it easier for developers to construct new housing units. State regulations pertaining to the construction of Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) have been updated to facilitate and expedite the construction of more housing. For example, Assembly Bill (AB) 68, AB 587, AB 671, AB 881, and Senate Bill (SB) 13 further incentivize the development of ADUs through streamlined permits, reduced setback requirements, increased allowable square footage, reduced parking requirements, and reduced fees.

State law is now very explicit about certain development standards such as structure height, required yard areas and setbacks, parking requirements, and various other development standards. State law supersedes local ordinances, therefore, when a city’s ordinance is not consistent with State law, then State law simply supersedes the local municipal codes and developers may invoke current State law. The California Department of Housing & Community Development (HCD) has been actively monitoring local agencies and have sent letters encouraging those agencies to update their municipal codes accordingly.

State law is also very clear about the wording of any architectural design Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
449 of 932
standards. State law does not permit vague terms such as “guidelines” or subjective methods of analysis and judgment. Terminology such as "be compatible with," "neighborhood character," or "materials matching or similar to" are no longer accepted by HCD. State law now requires the architectural design standards to be “objective standards,” defined as,

“Standards that involve no personal or subjective judgment by a public official and are uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal.” (Gov. Code § 66313, subdivision (i))

Furthermore, ADUs must be reviewed and approved (or denied) ministerially, without discretionary review or a public hearing (Gov. Code § 66317(a)).

Development standards must be objective to allow for ministerial review (Gov.

Code § 66314(b)(1)). Appeals of a ministerial permit may only be filed by the applicant or property owner (in the case of a denial), and not by the general public or any neighbors (in the case of an approval).

The Planning Division maintains a webpage to summarize current State requirements and development standards, including the ADU Handbook published by the Department of Housing & Community Development (HCD), available at: ‘https://www.cityofredlands.org/post/accessory-dwelling-units-adu ’.

SUMMARY:

Staff has prepared a draft ordinance that will update Redlands Municipal Code Chapter 18.156, Article VII (Second Residential Dwelling Units), which is a part of the City’s Zoning Regulations. The overarching goal of the ordinance is to align the City’s zoning code with current State ADU law, while also incorporating local municipal requirements that are permissible under State law.

Accessory units must now be allowed in all residential zoning districts that permit single-family and multifamily dwellings, as well as mixed use districts that permit residential uses. This also includes similar districts within Specific Plans that permit residential uses and mixed uses. Government Code section 66319 states that ADUs “shall be deemed to be an accessory use or an accessory building and shall not be considered to exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which it is located, and shall be deemed to be a residential use that is consistent with the existing general plan and zoning designations for the lot. The accessory dwelling unit shall not be considered in the application of any local ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential growth.”

Similarly, recent updates to State law include Gov. Code § 66318 that states, “(a) A local agency may amend its zoning ordinance or general plan to incorporate the policies, procedures, or other provisions applicable to the creation of an accessory dwelling unit if these provisions are consistent with the Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
450 of 932
limitations of this article.
(b) An accessory dwelling unit ordinance shall not be considered in the application of any local ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential growth.”

A legislative draft of the ordinance is attached that highlights proposed changes.

Updated sections and topics include:

1. Numbers of ADUs per lot: State law currently addresses the number(s) of ADUs that may be allowable per residential lot, based on the type of zoning (e.g., single-family lots and multifamily lots). These may include one detached ADU, one attached ADU, and one Junior ADU. Those provisions are incorporated by reference, and it is not necessary to reiterate in the ordinance.

2. Maximum floor area (Detached ADU): No change is proposed to the current maximum size of 1,200 square feet for a detached ADU (which aligns with current state law). The conversion of an existing accessory structure, such as a detached garage to an ADU, is not subject to unit size requirements (Gov. Code § 66323(a)(1)). Also, in the case of an existing garage proposed to be converted to an ADU, State law does not allow local agencies to require replacement parking for the structure being converted.

The California Department of Housing & Community Development has previously disallowed local ordinances that have attempted to limit ADU size based on parcel size. State law also overrules other local development standards that could limit the construction of ADUs, such as those pertaining to Lot Coverage, Floor-Area Ratio, building separation requirements (that exceed the Building Code’s standards), on-site landscaping or open space requirements, and any other local zoning standard that has the effect of precluding the development of an ADU.

3. Maximum floor area (Attached ADU): For an attached ADU, meaning created within the primary dwelling unit, the maximum will be 50% of the existing primary unit’s living area or 1,200 square feet, whichever is smaller. Junior ADU are limited to 500 square feet per State law and must be created within the existing walls of the primary unit. The ordinance will allow a de minimus addition of up to 150 square feet beyond the existing dimensions of the primary unit to provide for ingress/egress only, such as a staircase or landing (consistent with State law).

4. Development Standards: The proposed ordinance includes a table that clearly summarizes the development standards (height, floor area, and setbacks) for easy reference. Where State law provides for any exceptions or alternative standards (such as Gov. Code § 66323 units), State law is incorporated by reference.

5. High Fire Hazard Areas: The State will not allow local jurisdictions to prohibit the construction of new ADUs in high fire hazard severity zones. New Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
451 of 932
development in a High Fire Hazard area must comply with the new State codes including the 2025 Wildland-Urban Interface Code, which includes construction materials and design (e.g., requires Class A fire-resistant materials). The Fire Department’s review will address issues such as adequate water supply, landscape fuel modification, and vegetation management.

6. Parking requirements: The proposed ordinance aligns with current State law regarding the on-site parking requirements, or waivers and exemptions from the parking requirements, depending on the criteria in State law. A detached ADU generally will require one (1) parking space, unless an exemption applies, and must be on a paved surface which may be a driveway. An attached ADU or Junior ADU does not require any additional parking spaces.

7. Architectural design standards: The proposed ordinance includes objective architectural design standards for exterior materials, roof style, roof pitch, door and window openings and trim, light fixtures, ornamentation, accessory equipment, etc. The design standards must be written in such a way to preclude subjective judgment that might be exercised by staff or a Commission. Objective standards must be “uniformly verifiable by reference to an external and uniform benchmark or criterion available and knowable by both the applicant or proponent and the public official prior to submittal.”

Note that the architectural design standards would also be applicable in the City’s historic districts and locally designated historic properties. The Historic & Scenic Preservation Commission (HSPC) reviewed the draft ordinance on April 3, 2025, and June 5, 2025. The Commission’s suggestions and clarifications have been incorporated in the final draft. Building permits for an ADU must be processed and approved ministerially (without discretionary review), and therefore, the City cannot require a Certificate of Appropriateness or any review by the HSPC as that would involve a discretionary decision.

While State law does allow for a local agency to impose standards that prevent adverse impacts on any real property that is listed in the California Register of Historical Resources (Gov. Code § 66314(b)(1), there are very few properties in Redlands that are listed on the State’s Register. In other words, that provision does not include properties that are listed only on a local historic register (which includes the eight local historic districts in Redlands plus several individually designated historic properties).

8. Rental requirements: State law currently requires a rental period of 30 days or longer, and the draft ordinance reiterates that provision of State law.

9. Substantive requirements for local ordinances: The additional requirements for the content of local ordinances adopted pursuant to Gov. Code Section 66314 is contained in the draft ordinance (including sections pertaining to changes of occupancy, utility connections, exemptions from fire sprinkler requirements, and demolition of a detached garage, among other provisions).

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
452 of 932
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

The proposed code amendment is exempt from environmental review in accordance with Section 15282 (Other Statutory Exemptions) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Section 15282(h) states, “The adoption of an ordinance regarding second units in a single-family or multifamily residential zone by a city or county to implement the provisions" of State law is exempt from environmental review. The proposed ordinance meets the intent and purpose of that exemption. Accordingly, no further environmental review is necessary.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. City Council may suggest changes to the proposed draft ordinance;

2. City Council can continue the proposal and direct staff to address any further issues.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

The proposed ordinance will help implement Priority A (Quality of Life) contained in the Redlands Strategic Plan.

Strategic Objective 2 (Economic Vitality):
• Implement policies and programs to expand the City’s affordable housing opportunities.

SUBMITTED BY:

Brian Desatnik, Development Services Director
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Christopher Boatman, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Brian Foote, City Planner/Planning Manager
Attachments
Attachment A-1: Ordinance No. 2993 (Legislative)
Attachment A-2: Ordinance No. 2993 (Clean)
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
453 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
454 of 932
ORDINANCE NO. 2993
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AMENDING TITLE 18
(ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE REDLANDS MUNICIPAL CODE ,
CHAPTER 18. 156, ARTICLE VII ( SECOND R ESIDENTIAL DWELLING

UNITS), UPDATING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO ALIGN WITH
CURRENT STATE LAW.

WHEREAS, the City has initiated Ordinance Text Amendment No. 370 in accordance with Chapter 18.204 of the Redlands Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the City of Redlands faces a serious housing problem and the lack of access to affordable housing has a direct impact upon the health, safety, and welfare of the residents of the City; and

WHEREAS, the California Legislature has consistently recognized the continuing need for affordable housing in California, stating in Government Code § 65580, that "the availability of
housing is of vital statewide importance, and the early attainment of decent housing… is a priority of the highest order" and, further, that, "local… governments have a responsibility to use the powers vested in them to facilitate the improvement and development of housing to make adequate provision for the housing needs of all economic segments of the community"; and

WHEREAS, affordable housing is regulated by a variety of state and local laws, ordinances, and policies, and the Regional Housing Needs A llocation (RHNA) requires the City to provide for the development of a specified number of housing units. The City’s Housing Production allocation for the 2021- 2029 allocation cycle calls for the development of 2,234 new affordable housing units as follows: 652 uni ts are needed for moderate- income households, 615 units are needed for low-income households and 967 units are needed for very low and extremely low-income households; and

WHEREAS, a lack of new units affordable to very- low, low and moderate -income households within the City will have a substantially negative impact because: (1) housing will have to be built far from employment centers, which will increase commuting and nega tively impact traffic, air and noise pollution, and (2) the City and employers within the City will find it difficult to recruit and retain employees; and

WHEREAS, the State of California requires each city to develop a general plan establishing policies for future development. As specified in the California Government Code, the general plan must: ( i) encourage the development of a variety of housing types for all income levels; and ( ii) assist in the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of low and moderate-income households; and

WHEREAS, the City has authority under its police power to protect the public health, safety, and welfare, by imposing land use regulations that that will provide additional housing that is affordable to all income levels that is dispersed throughout the City; and

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
455 of 932
WHEREAS, the implementation of th is ordinance will aid the City in achieving the goal of making housing availability more diverse, dispersed, and affordable; and

WHEREAS, the City of Redlands is required to update Article VII of Chapter 18.156 of the Zoning Regulations to implement Program No. 1.6-3 contained in the certified and adopted 2021-2029 Housing Element; and

WHEREAS, California Government Code
§ 66318 states: (a) a local agency may amend
its zoning ordinance or general plan to incorporate the policies, procedures, or other provisions applicable to the creation of an accessory dwelling unit if these provisions are consistent with the limitations of State law; and, (b) an accessory dwelling unit ordinance shall not be considered in the application of any local ordinance, policy, or program to limit residential growth; and

WHEREAS on or about October 3, 2025, notice of the Planning Commission’s public hearing for this proposal was caused to be published in a newspaper of general circulation by the Secretary to the Planning Commission; and
WHEREAS, on October 14, 2025, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to, Ordinance Text Amendment No. 370; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has determined that the proposed Ordinance Text Amendment would be consistent with, and will implement , Program No. 1.6-3 contained in the certified and adopted 2021-2029 Housing Element; and

WHEREAS, the proposed Ordinance Text Amendment No. 370 is exempt from environmental review in accordance with Section 15282 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines; and

WHEREAS, on October 14, 2025, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that proposed Ordinance Text Amendment No. 370 be approved; and

WHEREAS, in accordance with California Government Code § 65090, on or about
November 7, 2025, the City Clerk gave notice by publication in a newspaper of general circulation of the holding of a public hearing at which Ordinance No. 2993 would be considered by City Council; and

WHEREAS, on November 18, 2025, the City Council held a noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to, Ordinance No. 2993.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
456 of 932

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. Environmental Determination. The City Council has reviewed the matter and, based upon the facts and information contained in the staff report, administrative record, and written and oral testimony, hereby finds that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15282 (Other Statutory Exemptions) of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15282(h) states, “The adoption of an ordinance regarding second units in a single -family or multifamily residential zone by a city or county to implement the provisions” of State law is exempt from environmental review. Therefore, no further environmental review is necessary.

SECTION 2. Chapter 18.156 (Development Provisions for Specific Uses), Article VII entitled, “Second Residential Dwelling Units,” is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“Article VII. Second Residential Accessory Dwelling Units

18.156.430: PURPOSE:

The purpose of this article is to establish the procedure for permitting an accessory second residential dwelling unit on lots zoned for residential uses. If this chapter is silent regarding a development standard or other applicable provision, then State law pertaining to an ADU is incorporated herein by reference (California Government Code § 66310, et seq). If any provisions contained in this Article conflict with applicable State law, as amended, then State law shall prevail.

18.156.440: SECOND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT DEFINED:

A. "Second Accessory dwelling unit (ADU)" means a detached or attached residential dwelling unit which provides complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons, inclusive of, but not limited to, permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same lot as a single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling is situated or proposed for development. An accessory dwelling second unit also includes an efficiency unit as defined in California Health and Safety Code § 17958.1, and a manufactured home as defined in California Health and Safety Code § 18007.

An accessory dwelling unit does not exceed the allowable density for the lot upon which it is located, and an accessory dwelling unit is a residential use that is consistent with the existing general plan and zoning designation for the subject property.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
457 of 932

18.156.450: APPROVAL REQUIRED:

A. Application for construction of an accessory dwelling second unit shall be made in the form of a site plan, floor plan, and building elevations (including labels, dimensions, materials and colors), building permit application form(s), and required Plan Check submittal items (roof plan, foundation plan, framing plan, structural calculations (where required), and Title 24 (California Energy Code, current edition) Energy Compliance Documents, and reviewed for completeness pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act (California Government Code § 65940, et seq), and shall be granted by the city's Community Development Director provided the application meets the provisions of this article.

B. The City shall approve or deny an application ministerially, without discretionary review or a public hearing, within sixty (60) days from the date the City received a complete application.

1. If the application is denied within sixty (60) days of receiving a completed application, then the City shall (within the time period described in California Government Code § 66317(a)) return a full set of comments to the applicant with a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied by the applicant. The applicant may revise and resubmit application materials or project plans prior to any final ministerial decision to deny the project.

2. If a detached garage is proposed to be replaced with an ADU, the demolition permit shall be reviewed ministerially with the application for the ADU and issued at the same time. The applicant shall not be otherwise required to provide written notice or post a placard for the demolition of a detached garage that is to be replaced with an ADU, unless the property is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district.

3. The provisions of this chapter shall not be implemented in conjunction with Chapter

18.06 (Fair Housing Reasonable Accommodations for Persons with Disabilities) of this title, or Chapter 18.156, Article XV (Single Room Occupancy Facilities) of this title. The provisions of this chapter shall not be implemented in conjunction with Chapter 17.12 (Urban Lot Splits into Two Residential Parcels) of Title 17 of the Redlands Municipal Code for projects involving an urban lot split pursuant to Senate Bill 9 (Chapter 162, Statutes of 2021).

4. Only the permit applicant or the property owner of the subject property may appeal the Director’s final decision denying a building permit to the planning commission within ten (10) days of the Director’s decision, in accordance with section 18.12.110 of this title, on forms provided by the city and upon payment of the fees established by resolution of the city council. The decision of the commission shall be final, unless an appeal therefrom is taken to the city council as provided for in section 18.12.110 of Chapter 18.12 of this title.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
458 of 932
Prior to approval, T the application must demonstrate compliance with the following criteria:

C. A. The accessory dwelling second unit is located on property zoned for single-family or multi-family use, or a mixed-use zone that allows residential uses (or an equivalent district of a specific plan). The number(s) and type(s) of ADU allowed to be constructed per property shall comply with current State law.

D. B. The lot contains an existing single-family dwelling (or has a permit for a proposed single-family dwelling) or contains an existing multi-family dwelling (or has a permit for a proposed multi-family dwelling. The ADU is either attached to, or located within, the existing or proposed primary dwelling (including attached garages, storage areas or similar uses) or an accessory structure, or detached from the existing or proposed primary dwelling and located on the same lot as the primary dwelling (including detached garages).

E. C. The square footage for the accessory dwelling second unit does not exceed the following standards:

1. The total area of floor space for a detached accessory dwelling second unit shall not exceed one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet. The minimum allowable size shall be not less than eight hundred (800) square feet.

2. The increased floor area for an attached accessory dwelling second unit shall not exceed fifty thirty percent (50% 30%) of the existing living area of the primary single-family dwelling unit, or one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet, whichever is smaller. The minimum allowable size shall be not less than eight hundred (800) square feet due to the size of the primary dwelling. An attached ADU may add up to 150 square feet beyond the physical dimensions of the existing primary unit to provide for ingress/egress only.

3. The total living space for a Junior ADU shall not exceed five hundred (500) square feet and must be created within an existing single-family residence or attached garage. A Junior ADU may add up to 150 square feet beyond the existing dimensions of the primary unit to provide for ingress/egress only. A Junior ADU shall comply with sub-paragraph (I) of this section.

4. Nothing in this article prohibits or otherwise restricts the creation of an efficiency unit (California Government Code § 66313) or an ADU pursuant to subdivision (a) of California Government Code § 66323.

F. D. The accessory dwelling second unit is either attached to the existing dwelling and located within the living area of that dwelling (which means the interior habitable area of a dwelling unit including basements and attics, but not including a garage or an accessory structure) or is a detached unit located on the same lot as the existing dwelling, and the number of ADU(s) on the subject property complies with State law.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
459 of 932
G. E. The ADU(s) second unit is not intended for sale and may be rented. Rental or lease terms shall not be less than thirty (30) days. Except as provided in State law (commencing with California Government Code § 66340), the accessory dwelling unit may be rented separate from the primary residence, but shall not be sold or otherwise conveyed separate from the primary residence.

H. F. Development Standards for ADUs.

1. The ADU second unit complies with city or applicable State requirements relating to height, setback, lot coverage, architectural review and maximum size of the unit. a. Refer to Table 18.156.450(H) for a summary of standards applicable in zones that allow single-family residential uses and single-family districts of adopted Specific Plans.
b. Refer to current State law (California Government Code § 66323(a)(4)) for applicable developments standards within multifamily residential zones (R-2, R- 2-2000, and R-3 zones of Redlands Municipal Code Title 18) and multifamily districts of adopted Specific Plans. Detached ADU(s) on multifamily lots do not have a floor area restriction.

Table 18.156.450(H): Development Standards for ADUs in Single-Family Residential Zones Development
Standard
Detached ADU
(new construction)
Detached ADU
(conversion)
Attached
ADU
Junior ADU
Floor Area Up to 1,200 sq. ft. *

Up to the existing
structure size
(limited to the
same location and
same dimensions
of the original
structure).

Not more than 50%
of the living area of
the existing primary
dwelling unit *
or 1,200 sq. ft.,
whichever is
smaller.

Up to 500 sq.
ft.,
(within the
existing walls
of the primary
unit only).

Height of
ADU

Up to 16 feet. **

Up to18 feet for a
detached ADU on
a lot that is within
one-half of one
mile walking
distance of a major
transit stop. **
Up to the existing
structure height
(limited to the
same dimension of
the original
structure).

Up to 25 ft.,
or 2 stories.

Not to exceed
the height of the
existing
primary
dwelling unit.

Front yard Same as for the primary unit *
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
460 of 932
Street side
yard Same as for the primary unit *
Interior side
yard
See current State law (varies by type of ADU) *
Rear yard See current State law (varies by type of ADU) * Building
Separation
Per applicable California Building Standards Code
and/or California Residential Code
n/a

* For any exceptions, refer to current State law. A detached or attached ADU of eight hundred (800) square feet with four-foot side and rear yard setbacks must be allowed to be constructed if in compliance with all other local development standards (California Government Code §§ 66321(b)(3), 66323(a)).
** A maximum height of 18 feet is allowable for a detached ADU on a lot that is within one-half of one mile (or 2,640 ft.) walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Public Resources Code § 21155. An additional two feet in height (up to 20 feet) shall also be allowed to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit (California Government Code § 66321(b)(4)).

2. Local development standards such as yard setbacks, lot coverage, floor area, building separation, open space or landscaping requirements shall not limit or prevent the development of an ADU consisting of at least eight hundred (800) square feet with minimum four foot (4’0”) side and rear setbacks.

3. Utility Connections
a. For an attached ADU or Junior ADU (described in California Government Code § 66323(a)(1)), a local agency, special district, or water corporation shall not require the applicant to install a new or separate utility connection directly between the ADU and the utility or impose a related connection fee or capacity charge, unless the ADU was constructed with a new single-family dwelling, or upon separate conveyance of the ADU(s) pursuant to California Government Code § 66342.
b. For an ADU that is not described in California Government Code § 66323(a)(1), a local agency, special district, or water corporation may require a new or separate utility connection directly between the ADU and the utility. An applicant or developer may request a separate utility connection(s). c. An attached ADU or Junior ADU may share utility connections with the primary dwelling unit.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
461 of 932
d. Properties served by an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System shall comply with the Local Agency Management Plan (LAMP).

4. An ADU may be issued a separate street address for purposes of utility connections, mail delivery, and/or emergency services.

I. Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit

1. One Junior ADU shall be permitted per residential lot zoned for single-family residences with a single-family residence built, or proposed to be built, on the lot.

2. The Junior ADU shall be constructed within the walls of the existing or proposed single-family residence, which may include enclosed uses within the residence such as attached garages.

3. The Junior ADU shall include a separate entrance from the main entrance to the existing or proposed single-family residence, and may add up to 150 square feet beyond the existing dimensions of the primary unit to provide for ingress/egress only.

4. If a permitted Junior ADU does not include a separate bathroom, the permitted Junior ADU shall include a separate entrance from the main entrance to the structure, with an interior entry to the main living area.

5. The Junior ADU shall include an efficiency kitchen, which shall include all of the following: a cooking facility with appliances; and, a food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the size of the Junior ADU.

6. A Junior ADU shall not require additional parking as a condition to grant a permit.

7. Owner-occupancy shall not be required as a condition to grant a permit.

18.156.460: PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

A. The lot upon which the accessory dwelling second unit is proposed shall have been legally created. conform to the minimum area and dimension standards of the zoning district in which the lot is located. Applicants for an ADU shall not, as a condition for ministerial approval, be required to correct any nonconforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures unless those conditions: present a threat to public health and safety; and, are affected by the construction of the ADU or Junior ADU (California Government Code §§ 66322(b), 66336).

B. Parking requirements for ADUs.

1. One parking space shall be provided on the same lot as the a new detached ADU, second unit, in addition to the required parking spaces serving the primary unit, unless exempt pursuant to this section or applicable State law. No parking space shall be required where the ADU is part of the existing or proposed primary dwelling unit or an existing accessory structure.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
462 of 932

2. Tandem parking is permissible to satisfy the parking provided for an ADU, requirement for the second unit, which, if parking is required, shall be provided on a paved driveway.

3. Guest parking shall not be required for an ADU.

4. On-site parking shall not be required for any properties meeting the criteria of applicable State law that exempts such development projects (California Government Code § 66322(a)):
a. Where the ADU is located within one-half mile walking distance of a public transit stop;
b. Where the ADU is part of the existing or proposed primary residence or an accessory structure;
c. When there is a car share vehicle located within one block of the ADU; d. When on-street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the ADU;
e. Where the ADU is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district; and,
f. When a permit application for an ADU is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family dwelling or a new multifamily dwelling on the same lot, provided that the ADU or the parcel satisfies any other criteria listed above.

5. When a garage, carport, covered parking structure, or uncovered parking space is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an ADU or converted to an ADU, the local agency shall not require that those off-street parking spaces be replaced.

6. Off-street parking shall be permitted in setback areas in locations determined by the local agency or through tandem parking, unless specific findings are made that parking in setback areas or tandem parking is not feasible based upon specific site or regional topographical or fire and life safety conditions (this subparagraph shall not apply to an ADU that is described in California Government Code § 66322).

C. The ADU(s)second units shall be provided with independent exterior access a separate outside entrance not visible from the street, with adequate pedestrian access from a public street to the entrance.

D. All ADU(s)second units shall comply with the standards of the current edition of the California Building Standards Code, Residential Code, Fire Code, and applicable engineering design standards of the City of Redlands or other regulatory agency for which the city exercises jurisdiction. an efficiency dwelling unit as defined by the uniform building code.

E. The A detached ADU second unit shall be located to the rear of the primary unit, if feasible. A new detached ADU should be located on the property so that it is minimally visible from a public street (not including alleys), if feasible.

F. If Development Impact Fees (DIF) are applicable to an ADU development project, then all applicable fees shall be paid prior to building permit issuance.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
463 of 932
G. New detached ADU(s) or attached ADU to an existing dwelling unit that was permitted and built to comply with ignition resistant construction, proposed to be located on a property that is identified as being within a High Fire Hazard Zone (defined as High Threat, Very High Threat, or Extreme Threat areas as identified in the General Plan or State maps) shall satisfy all the following criteria, and shall be shown on the project plans prior to approval of any building or engineering permits for the ADU. The applicant shall include sufficient exhibits, labels, and information on the construction plans to preclude subjective judgment by the reviewing official.

1. The proposed ADU complies with all applicable regulations of the California Fire Code.

2. The proposed ADU complies with all applicable regulations of the California Building Standards Code (including current edition of the Wildland-Urban Interface Code).

3. The subject property will comply with all applicable landscape design, materials, fuel modification, and vegetation management requirements of Redlands Municipal Code Chapter 15.30 (Wildland-Urban Interface Code) and/or applicable State law (including but not limited to Public Resource Code § 4291, 14 California Code of Regulations § 1299.03, California Fire Code § 505.1, and California Building Code Chapter 7A) for requirements pertaining to landscape fuel modification zones and vegetation management for properties in a high fire hazard severity zone. Such information shall be shown on a Site Plan (or the applicant may choose to submit a Landscape Plan) to demonstrate compliance prior to permit issuance.

4. If required by the applicable provisions of the California Fire Code or California Building Standards Code, that an adequate water supply is provided on-site, or the property is connected to a public water line to serve any fire sprinkler system.

H. Changes in occupancy. Local building code requirements shall apply to detached dwellings, except that the construction of an ADU shall not constitute a Group R occupancy change under the local building code, as described in Section 310 of the California Building Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), unless the City’s building official makes a written finding based on substantial evidence in the record that the construction of the ADU could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety. Nothing in this paragraph shall be interpreted to prevent a local agency from changing the occupancy code of a space that was unhabitable space or was only permitted for nonresidential use and was subsequently converted for residential use pursuant to this article or applicable State law.

I. The application for the proposed ADU and related improvements shall demonstrate compliance with the City’s Local Agency Management Plan (LAMP) for Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems, if applicable. If required, the applicant shall obtain approval by the local health officer where a private sewage disposal system is being used.

J. Accessory dwelling units shall not be required to provide fire sprinklers if they are not required for the primary residence. The construction of an ADU shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling (California Government Code § Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
464 of 932
66314).

18.156.470: ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS:

A. Applicants may utilize one of the pre-approved ADU construction plans offered by the City (also referred to as pre-approved ADU Standard Plans) to submit to Plan Check for a building permit(s). The pre-approved ADU Standard Plans shall be presumed to be consistent with the objective design standards of this section. Applicants may also choose to prepare and submit custom designs, subject to the following provisions.

B. Architectural Design Elements.

1. For new ADU construction, all required or recommended exterior design features as listed below should be shown on the construction plans prior to permit issuance. The applicant shall include sufficient exhibits, labels, and information on the construction plans to preclude subjective judgment by the reviewing official. a. Exterior Primary Material
i. For properties not located within a High Fire Hazard Area, exterior wall cladding material shall be wood, stucco, plaster, brick, stone, or a combination thereof.

ii. Reflective or metallic siding materials are prohibited. iii. When feasible, the applicant shall identify the architectural style, design elements, and material(s) and color(s) of the primary dwelling unit, and the applicant may choose to implement the recommended design elements appropriate for the stated architectural style in accordance with Table

18.156.470(B)(1).

iv. For properties located within a High Fire Hazard Area, the proposed design shall use Class A rated exterior walls (e.g., brick, stone, fiber cement, stucco, aluminum treated with decorative finish, or an equivalent Class A material, or a combination thereof).

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
465 of 932

Table 18.156.470(B)(1): Objective Design Standards for Specific Architectural Styles Architectural Style of
Primary Dwelling Unit
Recommended Design Elements
of Proposed ADU
Craftsman
or
Bungalow
Exterior siding: wood
Roof style: gable
Roof pitch: not less than 2:12 (9 degrees) and not more than 5:12 (23 degrees)
Windows: double-hung, casement
Window & Door trim: wood, not less than 1 inch in width, and not more than 6 inches in width.

Mission
or
Mediterranean
Exterior siding: stucco
Roof style: hip
Roof material: clay tile
Roof pitch: not less than 3:12 (14 degrees) and not more than 5:12 (23 degrees)
Window & Doors openings: rounded or arched openings
Window & Door trim: stucco, not less than 1 inch in width, and not more than 3 inches in width.

American Foursquare
or
Classic Box

Exterior siding: wood
Roof style: hip
Roof pitch: not less than 3:12 (14 degrees) and not more than 5:12 (23 degrees)
Windows: double-hung
Window & Door trim: wood, not less than 1 inch in width, and not more than 6 inches in width.

American Colonial
Revival
Exterior siding: wood, or brick
Roof style: hip or gable
Roof pitch: not less than 3:12 (14 degrees) and not more than 7:12 (30 degrees)
Windows: multi-pane sash
Window & Door trim: wood, not less than 1 inch in width, and not more than 3 inches in width (exception: may
include shutters)
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
466 of 932
Spanish Colonial
Revival
Exterior siding: stucco
Roof style: hip or gable
Roof material: clay tile
Roof pitch: not less than 3:12 (14 degrees) and not more than 5:12 (23 degrees)
Window & Doors openings: arched or rounded openings
Windows: single and paired multi-pane windows
Window & Door trim: stucco, not less than 1 inch in width, and not more than 6 inches in width.

Victorian-era
(Second Empire,
Eastlake/Stick,
or Queen Anne)
Materials: wood
Roof style: gable or mansard
Roof pitch: not less than 8:12 (33 degrees) and
not more than 15:12 (51 degrees)
Windows: double-hung
Window & Door trim: wood, not less than 1 inch in width, and not more than 3 inches in width.

Modern
(1945 – 1975)
Exterior siding: wood, brick, stucco, or stone
Roof style: gable, or flat
Roof pitch: not less than 1:12 (5 degrees) and not more than 7:12 (31 degrees)
Window & Door frames: metal or wood framing
Window & Door trim: not less than 1 inch in width, and
not more than 6 inches in width (exception: may include shutters)
Ranch Exterior siding: wood, wainscot, brick, or stone Roof style: gable
Roof pitch: not less than 3:12 (14 degrees) and not more than 8:12 (34 degrees)
Window & Door trim: wood, not less than 1 inch in width, and not more than 6 inches in width.

Other (not specified)
or
None of the above
Exterior siding: wood, stucco, plaster, or brick
Roof style: hip or gable
Roof pitch: not less than 3:12 (14 degrees) and not more than 10:12 (40 degrees)
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
467 of 932
Window & Door trim or framing: not less than one-half
(0.5) inch in width, and not more than 6 inches in width.

b. Historic Properties:
i. For new structures on a designated historic property, including properties within a local historic or scenic district, it is recommended that the exterior design is sufficiently differentiated from the historic building so that the ADU is clearly distinguishable from the historic structure. This may be achieved through use of simplified exterior materials and treatments (for example, omit ornamentation, or use of plain roof fascia rather than an eave cornice, or use of undivided window panes rather than divided windows, etc.).
ii. A new accessory dwelling unit should be located on the property so that it is minimally visible (if at all) from the public right-of-way, if feasible, so that the new ADU is subordinate to the primary historic dwelling on the property. The ADU should have a lower height that the primary historic dwelling as well as a simple exterior design, omit ornamentation, and avoid decorative details. iii. Applicants may also refer to the City’s adopted Historic Architectural Design Guidelines for guidance.
c. Roof Pitch and Design:
i. Roof style and construction shall be hipped or gable (the exception is for California Government Code § 66323 units which includes all converted units, all Junior ADUs, 800 square-foot new construction detached units with four-foot setbacks, and detached units with multifamily primary dwelling structures). The applicant may choose another style if the proposal complies with Table

18.156.470(B)(1) above.

ii. Roof pitch shall be not less than 3:12 and not more than 10:12, when feasible (the exception is for California Government Code § 66323 units which includes all converted units, all Junior ADUs, 800 square-foot new construction detached units with four-foot setbacks, and detached units with multifamily primary dwelling structures). The applicant may choose another style if the proposal Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
468 of 932
complies with Table 18.156.470(B)(1) above. It is recommended that roof pitch of the ADU should be equal to or less than (within 20% or 5 degrees, whichever is larger) the roof pitch of the primary unit, when feasible.

iii. Dormers, cupolas, turrets, towers, domes, or other projections (including chimneys) are prohibited.

iv. For properties located within a High Fire Hazard Area, the proposal uses Class A rated roofing materials and Class A rated siding materials (e.g., eaves, rooflines, fascia, rafter tails, shutters, etc.). Roof vents, gable vents, soffit vents, and other openings, if any, shall be ember resistant.
d. Ornamentation: The exterior design of the ADU shall not include unnecessary ornamentation and the following architectural details shall be prohibited, such as wrought iron features, arcades, porticos, balconets, brackets, columns, corbels, cornice, quoins, rafter tails, dormers, cupolas, finials, etc. e. For new two-story ADUs or additions, the front and street-facing side elevations shall be articulated and recessed (e.g., vertically and horizontally offset) a minimum of five feet (5’) from the first-story building façade, when feasible (the exception is for California Government Code § 66323 units which includes all converted units, all Junior ADUs, 800 square-foot new construction detached units with four-foot setbacks, and detached units with multifamily primary dwelling structures). f. Exterior light fixtures shall be a design, or shall include shielding (for the length of the bulb or light source), to prevent light trespass onto adjacent properties. Glare shall be contained within the subject property, and the fixture design or shielding must prevent light trespass onto adjacent properties that exceeds one foot-candle as measured at the property line.
g. Ground-mounted ductless condensers and heat pumps shall be permitted at ground level. Heating and cooling air handlers or ductwork shall be installed within the building envelope. “Building envelope” is defined as the outer shell of a building that separates the interior from the exterior environment. h. Visibility of HVAC Equipment: Window and roof-mounted HVAC equipment shall not be visible from a public street (not including alleys), when feasible. i. A new exterior stairway to a second floor ADU shall not be visible from a public street (not including alleys), when feasible.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
469 of 932

2. Required Design Elements for Conversion of an Existing Structure to an ADU. a. Existing building elements may remain if in compliance with the applicable provisions of the California Building Standards Code, Residential Code, and Fire Code.
b. Installation or construction of new exterior design elements, features, or treatments shall conform to the requirements of subsection (B)(1) above, when feasible.”

SECTION 3. General Plan Consistency. The City Council finds that the amendment to Title 18 (Zoning Regulations) of the Redlands Municipal Code described herein is consistent with the adopted and certified 2021-2029 (6th Cycle) Housing Element of the City of Redlands 2035 General Plan, and will comply with the applicable provisions of State law.

SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance for any reason is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance, and each section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared invalid or unconstitutional.

SECTION 5. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once in the Redlands Daily Facts, a newspaper of general circulation within the City, and there after, this ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.

_________________________________
Mario Saucedo, Mayor

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
470 of 932
I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of November, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
471 of 932
ORDINANCE NO. 2993
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AMENDING TITLE 18
(ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE REDLANDS MUNICIPAL CODE ,
CHAPTER 18. 156, ARTICLE VII ( SECOND R ESIDENTIAL DWELLING

UNITS), UPDATING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TO ALIGN WITH
CURRENT STATE LAW.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
472 of 932
WHEREAS, the implementation of th is ordinance will aid the City in achieving the goal of making housing availability more diverse, dispersed, and affordable; and

WHEREAS, the proposed Ordinance Text Amendment No. 370 is exempt from environmental review in accordance with Section 15282 of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines; and

WHEREAS, on October 14, 2025, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that proposed Ordinance Text Amendment No. 370 be approved; and

WHEREAS, on November 18, 2025, the City Council held a noticed public hearing at which interested persons had an opportunity to testify in support of, or opposition to, Ordinance No. 2993.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
473 of 932

NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 2. Chapter 18.156 (Development Provisions for Specific Uses), Article VII entitled, “Second Residential Dwelling Units,” is amended in its entirety to read as follows:

“Article VII. Accessory Dwelling Units

18.156.430: PURPOSE:

The purpose of this article is to establish the procedure for permitting an accessory dwelling unit on lots zoned for residential uses. If this chapter is silent regarding a development standard or other applicable provision, then State law pertaining to an ADU is incorporated herein by reference (California Government Code § 66310, et seq). If any provisions contained in this Article conflict with applicable State law, as amended, then State law shall prevail.

18.156.440: ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT DEFINED:

A. "Accessory dwelling unit (ADU)" means a detached or attached residential dwelling unit which provides complete, independent living facilities for one or more persons, inclusive of, but not limited to, permanent provisions for living, sleeping, eating, cooking, and sanitation on the same lot as a single-family dwelling or multifamily dwelling is situated or proposed for development. An accessory dwelling unit also includes an efficiency unit as defined in California Health and Safety Code § 17958.1, and a manufactured home as defined in California Health and Safety Code § 18007.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
474 of 932

18.156.450: APPROVAL REQUIRED:

A. Application for construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall be made in the form of a site plan, floor plan, building elevations (including labels, dimensions, materials and colors), building permit application form(s), and required Plan Check submittal items (roof plan, foundation plan, framing plan, structural calculations (where required), and Title 24 (California Energy Code, current edition) Energy Compliance Documents, and reviewed for completeness pursuant to the Permit Streamlining Act (California Government Code § 65940, et seq), and shall be granted by the city's Community Development Director provided the application meets the provisions of this article.

B. The City shall approve or deny an application ministerially, without discretionary review or a public hearing, within sixty (60) days from the date the City received a complete application.

3. The provisions of this chapter shall not be implemented in conjunction with Chapter

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
475 of 932
Prior to approval, the application must demonstrate compliance with the following criteria:

C. The accessory dwelling unit is located on property zoned for single-family or multi-family use, or a mixed-use zone that allows residential uses (or an equivalent district of a specific plan).

The number(s) and type(s) of ADU allowed to be constructed per property shall comply with current State law.

D. The lot contains an existing single-family dwelling (or has a permit for a proposed single- family dwelling) or contains an existing multi-family dwelling (or has a permit for a proposed multi-family dwelling. The ADU is either attached to, or located within, the existing or proposed primary dwelling (including attached garages, storage areas or similar uses) or an accessory structure, or detached from the existing or proposed primary dwelling and located on the same lot as the primary dwelling (including detached garages).

E. C. The square footage for the accessory dwelling unit does not exceed the following standards:

1. The total area of floor space for a detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet. The minimum allowable size shall be not less than eight hundred (800) square feet.

2. The increased floor area for an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the existing living area of the primary single-family dwelling unit, or one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet, whichever is smaller. The minimum allowable size shall be not less than eight hundred (800) square feet due to the size of the primary dwelling. An attached ADU may add up to 150 square feet beyond the physical dimensions of the existing primary unit to provide for ingress/egress only.

F. The accessory dwelling unit is either attached to the existing dwelling or is a detached unit located on the same lot as the existing dwelling, and the number of ADU(s) on the subject property complies with State law.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
476 of 932
G. The ADU(s) may be rented. Rental or lease terms shall not be less than thirty (30) days.

Except as provided in State law (commencing with California Government Code § 66340), the accessory dwelling unit may be rented separate from the primary residence but shall not be sold or otherwise conveyed separate from the primary residence.

H. Development Standards for ADUs.

1. The ADU complies with city or applicable State requirements relating to height, setback, architectural review and maximum size of the unit. a. Refer to Table 18.156.450(H) for a summary of standards applicable in zones that allow single-family residential uses and single-family districts of adopted Specific Plans.
b. Refer to current State law (California Government Code § 66323(a)(4)) for applicable developments standards within multifamily residential zones (R-2, R- 2-2000, and R-3 zones of Redlands Municipal Code Title 18) and multifamily districts of adopted Specific Plans. Detached ADU(s) on multifamily lots do not have a floor area restriction.

Up to the existing
structure size
(limited to the
same location and
same dimensions
of the original
structure).

Not more than 50%
of the living area of
the existing primary
dwelling unit *
or 1,200 sq. ft.,
whichever is
smaller.

Up to 500 sq.
ft.,
(within the
existing walls
of the primary
unit only).

Height of
ADU

Up to 16 feet. **

Up to 25 ft.,
or 2 stories.

Not to exceed
the height of the
existing
primary
dwelling unit.

Front yard Same as for the primary unit *
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
477 of 932
Street side
yard Same as for the primary unit *
Interior side
yard
See current State law (varies by type of ADU) *
Rear yard See current State law (varies by type of ADU) * Building
Separation
Per applicable California Building Standards Code
and/or California Residential Code
n/a

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
478 of 932
d. Properties served by an Onsite Wastewater Treatment System shall comply with the Local Agency Management Plan (LAMP).

4. An ADU may be issued a separate street address for purposes of utility connections, mail delivery, and/or emergency services.

I. Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit

1. One Junior ADU shall be permitted per residential lot zoned for single-family residences with a single-family residence built, or proposed to be built, on the lot.

2. The Junior ADU shall be constructed within the walls of the existing or proposed single-family residence, which may include enclosed uses within the residence such as attached garages.

6. A Junior ADU shall not require additional parking as a condition to grant a permit.

7. Owner-occupancy shall not be required as a condition to grant a permit.

18.156.460: PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS:

A. The lot upon which the accessory dwelling unit is proposed shall have been legally created. Applicants for an ADU shall not, as a condition for ministerial approval, be required to correct any nonconforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures unless those conditions: present a threat to public health and safety; and, are affected by the construction of the ADU or Junior ADU (California Government Code §§ 66322(b), 66336).

B. Parking requirements for ADUs.

1. One parking space shall be provided on the same lot as a new detached ADU, in addition to the required parking spaces serving the primary unit, unless exempt pursuant to this section or applicable State law. No parking space shall be required where the ADU is part of the existing or proposed primary dwelling unit or an existing accessory structure.

2. Tandem parking is permissible to satisfy the parking provided for an ADU, which, if parking is required, shall be provided on a paved driveway.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
479 of 932

3. Guest parking shall not be required for an ADU.

C. The ADU(s) shall be provided with independent exterior access, with adequate pedestrian access from a public street to the entrance.

D. All ADU(s) shall comply with the standards of the current edition of the California Building Standards Code, Residential Code, Fire Code, and applicable engineering design standards of the City of Redlands or other regulatory agency for which the city exercises jurisdiction.

E. A detached ADU shall be located to the rear of the primary unit, if feasible. A new detached ADU should be located on the property so that it is minimally visible from a public street (not including alleys), if feasible.

F. If Development Impact Fees (DIF) are applicable to an ADU development project, then all applicable fees shall be paid prior to building permit issuance.

G. New detached ADU(s) or attached ADU to an existing dwelling unit that was permitted and built to comply with ignition resistant construction, proposed to be located on a property that is identified as being within a High Fire Hazard Zone (defined as High Threat, Very High Threat, or Extreme Threat areas as identified in the General Plan or State maps) shall satisfy all the following criteria, and shall be shown on the project plans prior to approval of any building or Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
480 of 932
engineering permits for the ADU. The applicant shall include sufficient exhibits, labels, and information on the construction plans to preclude subjective judgment by the reviewing official.

1. The proposed ADU complies with all applicable regulations of the California Fire Code.

2. The proposed ADU complies with all applicable regulations of the California Building Standards Code (including current edition of the Wildland-Urban Interface Code).

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
481 of 932

18.156.470: ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN STANDARDS:

B. Architectural Design Elements.

18.156.470(B)(1).

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
482 of 932
Table 18.156.470(B)(1): Objective Design Standards for Specific Architectural Styles Architectural Style of
Primary Dwelling Unit
Recommended Design Elements
of Proposed ADU
Craftsman
or
Bungalow
Exterior siding: wood
Roof style: gable
Roof pitch: not less than 2:12 (9 degrees) and not more than 5:12 (23 degrees)
Windows: double-hung, casement
Window & Door trim: wood, not less than 1 inch in width, and not more than 6 inches in width.

American Foursquare
or
Classic Box

American Colonial
Revival
Exterior siding: wood, or brick
Roof style: hip or gable
Roof pitch: not less than 3:12 (14 degrees) and not more than 7:12 (30 degrees)
Windows: multi-pane sash
Window & Door trim: wood, not less than 1 inch in width, and not more than 3 inches in width (exception: may
include shutters)
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
483 of 932
Spanish Colonial
Revival
Exterior siding: stucco
Roof style: hip or gable
Roof material: clay tile
Roof pitch: not less than 3:12 (14 degrees) and not more than 5:12 (23 degrees)
Window & Doors openings: arched or rounded openings
Windows: single and paired multi-pane windows
Window & Door trim: stucco, not less than 1 inch in width, and not more than 6 inches in width.

Other (not specified)
or
None of the above
Exterior siding: wood, stucco, plaster, or brick
Roof style: hip or gable
Roof pitch: not less than 3:12 (14 degrees) and not more than 10:12 (40 degrees)
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
484 of 932
Window & Door trim or framing: not less than one-half
(0.5) inch in width, and not more than 6 inches in width.

18.156.470(B)(1) above.

ii. Roof pitch shall be not less than 3:12 and not more than 10:12, when feasible (the exception is for California Government Code § 66323 units which includes all converted units, all Junior ADUs, 800 square-foot new construction detached units with four-foot setbacks, and detached units with multifamily primary dwelling structures). The applicant may choose another style if the proposal Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
485 of 932
complies with Table 18.156.470(B)(1) above. It is recommended that roof pitch of the ADU should be equal to or less than (within 20% or 5 degrees, whichever is larger) the roof pitch of the primary unit, when feasible.

iii. Dormers, cupolas, turrets, towers, domes, or other projections (including chimneys) are prohibited.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
486 of 932

SECTION 5. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once in the Redlands Daily Facts, a newspaper of general circulation within the City, and thereafter, this ordinance shall take effect as provided by law.

_________________________________
Mario Saucedo, Mayor

ATTEST:

____________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
487 of 932
I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk, City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of November, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

__________________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
488 of 932
City Council Meeting K. 2.

DATE: 11/18/2025
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Public Hearing to consider Resolution No. 8731 for approval of the following land use entitlements for the development of two vacant parcels located at 516 Cajon Street (APNs: 0173-043-15-0000 and 0173-043-16-0000) in the Administrative & Professional Office (A-P) District, and determine that adoption of Resolution No. 8731 is not subject to environmental review pursuant to Sections 15315 and 15332 of the California Environmental Quality Act
(Development Services Director Desatnik)
(Mayor to declare meeting open as a public hearing)
a. Tentative Tract Map No. 20792 – A request to merge two parcels for development purposes and create eight residential condominium airspace units plus one common lot.
b. Conditional Use Permit No. 1201 – A request to construct and operate a condominium development in accordance with Chapter 18.156, Article IV, of the Redlands Municipal Code. c. Commission Review and Approval No. 972 – A request for site plan approval to construct four detached two-story residences (with two condominium dwelling units per building) for a total of eight condominiums and related site
improvements, parking, landscape, lighting, recreational amenities, and utility connections.
d. Adoption of a Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study prepared for the proposed project as required by Measure "U."
PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC HEARING:

Mayor declares the meeting open as a public hearing.1.

Mayor calls upon Department Director for report.2.

Mayor calls for questions/comments from members of the City Council.

3. Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
489 of 932
Mayor calls upon applicant, or his/her representative, for comments and testimony.

4. Mayor calls for comments/questions/testimony from members of the public
(3 minutes per speaker).

5. Mayor calls upon City Clerk to note any written comments received.

6. Mayor calls upon the applicant, or representative, for rebuttal comments (5 minutes).

7. Mayor closes the public hearing.8.

City Council considers the motion and votes.9.

MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that the Planning Commission's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:
"I move that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 8731 and approve the residential development located at 516 Cajon Street."
RECOMMENDATION:

On October 14, 2025, the Planning Commission reviewed the project and voted 6 - 0 to adopt Resolution No. 1725 recommending approval of the project.

BACKGROUND:

The project site consists of two parcels and is currently vacant. Two single-family dwellings previously existed on the site (one house on each lot).

The homes appear on Sanborn maps between 1900 and 1908. City building permit records show that the homes at 516 and 522 Cajon Street were demolished in 1974 and 1975. City records show that the original homes were a version of the Craftsman architectural style.

The project site is within Historic District No. 3, the "Early Redlands Historic and Scenic District" (see Attachment A - Location Map). New development on vacant sites within any of the City’s Historic and Scenic Preservation districts also require approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (which is included in the Conditions of Approval for this project). Prior to scheduling the Planning Commission meeting, the proposed design was presented to the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission for design review feedback, and the project architect significantly revised the design. The current design proposal (now a Craftsman architectural style) was reviewed by the Planning Commission and recommended for approval.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
490 of 932
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:

The applicant proposes to construct four detached residential buildings, two stories high, with a total of eight (8) condominium dwelling units on a vacant

0.5-acre property. The total floor area is approximately 11,200 square-feet and features an enclosed tuck-under 2-car garage for each unit, four uncovered guest parking spaces, common and private open space areas, perimeter landscaping, and related site improvements. Each dwelling unit will provide three bedrooms plus individually designated private outdoor space. Vehicular access will be provided from the alley at the rear of the property (similar to the other residences on the block).

The required entitlements for the project include:
• Commission Review & Approval No. 972 for site plan and architectural design review;
• Tentative Tract Map No. 20792 for a condominium subdivision; and, • Conditional Use Permit No. 1201 for a condominium project.

Note that the zoning code requires the City Council to approve a Conditional Use Permit for a condominium project in conjunction with the Tentative Tract Map for condominium purposes (RMC Section 18.156.300). Therefore, the City Council will be the decision-making body for the project.

ANALYSIS
A) General Plan Policies
The subject property is within the "Office (O)" land use designation (see Attachment B – General Plan Land Use Map), which permits residential uses consistent with the underlying zoning district (A-P zone and including R-3 residential uses). The intent of the Office land use designation is to encourage the concentration and high visibility of office uses and professional activities mixed in with residential uses.The project proposes a medium density attached residential development, which is consistent with the intent of the Office land use designation, as well as consistent with the surrounding residential developments.

In addition, the proposed use is consistent with the applicable policies and actions of the General Plan, including the following:

Policy 4-P.16: Promote a variety of housing types to serve the diverse needs of the community.

Policy 4-P.6: Provide for a balance among a variety of different land uses and their distribution among the city’s neighborhoods.

Policy 4-P.9: Locate medium- and high-density development near regional Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
491 of 932
access routes, transit stations, employment centers, shopping areas, and public services.

Action 4-A.8: Promote the development of a greater variety of housing types, including single-family homes on small lots, accessory dwelling units, townhomes, lofts, live-work spaces, and senior and student housing to meet the needs of future demographics and changing family sizes.

Principle 4-P.3: Focus new development in infill areas in order to preserve open space, agriculture, and citrus groves, particularly around the edges of the city.

B) Zoning Standards
The Administrative & Professional Office (A-P) District allows for business and professional offices along with residential uses consistent with the Multiple Family Residential (R-3) District. Condominium dwellings are also conditionally permitted in the R-3 district. The project will comply with all applicable development standards for the A-P and R-3 zones, as summarized in Table 1.

Table 1: Summary of applicable development standards.

Development
Standards
Requirement Proposal Complies?
Lot Coverage 60% (max.) of the total
lot area
51% Yes
Density 1,450 sq. ft. (max.) per
unit
2,170 sq ft per
unit
Yes
Building Height 4 stories max. 2 stories Yes
Front Yard 20 ft. min. 22 ft. Yes
Side Yard 7.5 ft. min. for
two-story bldg.

7.5 ft. min.
each side
Yes
Rear Yard
(minimum)
20 ft. min. 26 ft Yes
Common Open
Space
1,100 sq. ft minimum
for the entire site
1,292 sq. ft Yes
Private Open
Space
100 sq. ft. minimum
per unit
100 sq. ft. or
more per unit
Yes
C) Commission Review and Approval
Site Design: The site consists of two large parcels (approximately 136’ wide and 160’ deep) consistent with other residential lots along that segment of Cajon Street. Vehicular access to the site will be from the rear alleyway on the west side of the site (see Attachment C-1, Site Plan). The alleyway can be accessed Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
492 of 932
from both West Home Place and West Cypress Avenue. The overall site layout is four detached buildings, with each containing two attached condo units sharing a common wall. A new driveway from the alley will provide access to the garages and on-site parking. The dwelling unit front entrances are on the first floor and will face either Cajon Street, or across from the abutting attached unit, or face the common open spaces. The primary common open space area is placed at the rear of the property (southwest corner adjacent to the alley), and the remainder of the site has decorative landscape and hardscape throughout.

Architectural Design: The proposed two-story buildings will have the form, massing, and appearance as detached single-family residences. Each detached building is to contain only two units, which will limit the bulk and massing of each structure and achieves better compatibility with the surrounding residential homes along both sides of Cajon Street as well as behind the subject property along South 4th Street. The buildings will include materials, details, and features that are consistent with the Craftsman architectural style (see Attachments C-2 and C-3, Architectural Elevations). The buildings will be two stories high (or up to 26 feet) which is equal to or less than the nearby existing 2-1/2 story houses that were historically developed along Cajon Street. Each residence includes horizontal articulation or projections around the second floor, and each unit has approximately the same number of windows, doors, and a patio or balcony.

Outdoor Living Space: The applicable Multiple Family Residential (R-3) District standards require Common Open Space as well as Private Open Space. Overall, 2,800 square feet of outdoor living space is required. The project is providing 1,688 square feet of private space between all the units, and a common open space at 1,292 square feet. This combination results in a total of 2,980 square feet being provided to residents of the project.

The single Common Open Space area provides a total of 1,292 square feet (minimum of 1,000 sq. ft. required) and is designed as a recreational space located at the southwest rear corner of the lot. This area must also have a minimum dimension of 20 feet, which is provided. Amenities include playground equipment, barbecue pits, tables, and rubbish receptacles. Note that this area does not include the private patio area in front of the condominium unit that faces the west (rear) side of the lot.

Each dwelling unit must have Private Open Space. For ground floor units, the space must be a minimum size of 100 square-feet and with a minimum dimension of 8 feet. Each unit will be provided a patio or balcony that meets the design requirements (see Attachment C-2 with floor plans).

Site Landscape: The remainder of the site has other landscaping features such as planters and lawns. These spaces have a number of different trees, shrubs, perennials, and groundcover such as Brisbane Box, Crape Myrtle, Foxtail Agave, Texas Privet, Small Cape Rush, Little Rev Flax Lilly, and others. Within the front yard area, two 6” tall planter curbs sit against the majority the eastern Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
493 of 932
property line (facing Cajon Street), the landscape palette includes trees, shrubs, and groundcover.

Walls and Fencing: The project site will have perimeter concrete block wall approximately 5’0” high along the west (rear), north and south (side) property lines. Within the front yard area facing Cajon Street, a fence 3’0” high will be installed, and will include 6” high planters with trees, shrubs, and perennials. The low planter will be a physical barrier to help delineate the semi-private front yards from the public sidewalk. The rear vehicle access from the alleyway will be open, with no proposal for a gate.

Parking: A total of 20 parking spaces are required, and 20 will be provided. This consists of 16 garage spaces (a two-car garage per unit) plus four unenclosed guest spaces. This satisfies the number of parking spaces required in the R-3 district, which is two (2) spaces for every three-bedroom unit. In addition, one guest parking space for each two units (or 0.5 guest space per unit) is required for a minimum of four spaces, and four will be provided between the buildings.

Traffic: The proposed project is forecast to generate fewer than 50 vehicle trips during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours. The surrounding neighborhoods and corridor along Cajon Street have been otherwise fully developed for many decades. Therefore, the project will not significantly impact intersection level of service (“LOS”) in the vicinity, and will not conflict with any Measure ‘U’ traffic requirements.

Inclusionary Housing Requirement: The project has fewer than ten (10) dwelling units, and therefore, is exempt from the City’s inclusionary housing regulations (RMC 18.230.120(A)). The project is not required to provide any affordable units within the development nor pay an in-lieu fee.

D) Condominium Subdivision
The proposed Tentative Tract Map (Attachment D) will subdivide the existing two acres, totaling one-half (0.5) acre into 8 residential condominium units plus Lot No. 1 for the common areas. The A-P district requires a minimum lot size of 10,000 square-feet and the proposed Lot No. 1 is 21,760 square-feet, as well as exceeding the minimum lot dimensions requirements for the A-P zone (RMC Chapter 18.64). The common lot includes the on-site private parking, open space, pedestrian walkways, and landscaped buffer areas. The tentative map complies with the condominium development standards contained in RMC Chapter 18.156, Article IV (Condominiums and Condominium Conversions).

Access and Improvements: The proposed project will have vehicular access only from the alley at the rear of the property (accessible from Home Place and Cypress Avenue). The front of the property provides pedestrian access from Cajon Street. The standard Engineering conditions of approval (Attachment G) will require on-site improvements, perimeter improvements (along the Cajon Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
494 of 932
Street frontage as well as the alley), and payment of typical development impact fees. No dedications of additional street or alley right-of-way are necessary.

E) Architectural Review Criteria
RMC Section 18.12.170 provides that the Planning Commission shall review the aspects of the design based on the criteria listed in the code, and whether approval of the plan is in the best interest of the public health, safety, and general welfare. It is intended that design submittals be compatible with the character of adjacent and surrounding developments, and that they be of comparable composition, materials, textures, and colors. The proposed design meets all criteria and the Planning Commission has recommended approval, subject to additional Conditions of Approval specifying the use of only natural materials (such as wood and stone) and not faux stone, plastic, or other imitation materials on the exterior facades.

As mentioned in the Background section, the subject property is located within the Early Redlands Historic and Scenic District (Historic District No. 3).

Therefore, the final design will require subsequent approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness (by the Historic & Scenic Preservation Commission) for consideration of the final architectural design and consistency with the City’s Historic Architectural Design Guidelines. Condition of Approval No. 22 is included that will require the approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness prior to building permit issuance (although the HSPC has previously reviewed the proposed design and the applicant has made substantial revisions in response to prior feedback). Staff believes the proposal will be acceptable to the Commission.

F) Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study
Measure ‘U’ requires that a Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study be prepared for projects involving new structures larger than 5,000 square feet, and a Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study has been prepared (see Attachment F).

According to the cost/benefit model used by the City, the proposed project will result in an annual revenue totaling $11,445 and annual costs totaling $5,909.

Therefore, the annual net revenue expected from the project is anticipated to be approximately $5,537 and results in a positive cost/benefit ratio of +1.94.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
495 of 932
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

In accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), the project qualifies for a categorical exemption from environmental review pursuant to Sections 15315 (Minor Land Divisions) and 15332 (Infill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15332 pertains to infill development projects on sites that are less than five acres in size and consists of projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the following conditions:
a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations.
b) The proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. c) The project site has no value, as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.
d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality.
e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The proposed project meets all applicable criteria, will not have any potentially significant impacts on the environment, and is eligible for exemption from environmental review.

ALTERNATIVES:

1. The City Council may continue the public hearing and direct staff to address any issues or bring back additional information.

2. The City Council may continue the public hearing and direct staff to prepare findings for denial of this request.

SUBMITTED BY:

Brian Desatnik, Development Services Director
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Nylsen Escajeda, Assistant Planner

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
496 of 932
Attachments
Attachment A: Location Map and Aerial Photograph
Attachment B-1: General Plan Land Use Map
Attachment B-2: Zoning Map
Attachment C-1: Site Plan
Attachment C-2: Architectural Elevations
Attachment C-3: Color Renderings
Attachment D: Tentative Tract Map No. 20792
Attachment E: Landscape Plan
Attachment F: Socio-Economic Cost Benefit Study
Attachment G: City Council Resolution No. 8731
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
497 of 932
W Home P
l
S 4
th
St
Ca
jon St
Cajon St
Cajon St
017305404
017304311
017305407
017304314
017303411
017305403
017304308
017304307
017304309
017304317
017304319
017305406
017304310
017304312
017304212
017304313
017304318
017305402
017305415
017304315
017305405
017304316
0 30 60 90 12015
US Feet
City of Redlands
Attachment A - Location Map and Aerial Photograph
Author: Redlands GIS Date: 9/29/2025
Project Location
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
498 of 932
W Home P
l
S 4
th
St
Ca
jon St
Cajon St
Cajon St
017305404
017304311
017305407
017304314
017303411
017305403
017304308
017304307
017304309
017304317
017304319
017305406
017304310
017304312
017304212
017304313
017304318
017305402
017305415
017304315
017305405
017304316
0 30 60 90 12015
US Feet
City of Redlands
Attachment A - Location Map and Aerial Photograph
Author: Redlands GIS Date: 9/29/2025
Project Location
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
499 of 932
S 4t
h
St
S 4th St
S 4th St
W Home Pl
S Eureka St
S Eureka St
W Home Pl
W Home Pl
Cajon St
S
4th St
W Home Pl
W Home Pl
E Ho
me Pl
Cajon St
Cajon St
S 4th St
S 4th St
La Ve
rne St
E Home
Pl
Carrie Ln
La Verne St
E Hom
e Pl
Cajon St
W Cypress Ave
E Cypress Ave
Cajon St
Cajon
St
Carrie Ln
Carrie Ln
La Verne St
La Verne St
Cypress Cir
E Cypress
Ave
017303417
017303318
017303312
017304317
017304211
017304311
017304313
017305408
017304113
017303310
017303323
017304215
017303418
017304323
017304217
017303416
017304204
017304206
017303315
017305404
017305413
017304312
017304318
017305414
017303411
017305403
017304112
017303311
017317147
017304212
017304302
017304301
017304214
017304209
017303413
017303412
017304305
017303414
017304213
017304207
017304208
017305409
017305415
017305407
017304308
017303319
017304309
017317140
017305401
017304316
017305405
017303409
017304319
017304321
017303406
017304314
017303415
017304307
017317117
017304210
017317119
017304216
017303408
017303305
017303407
017304306
017305101
017304315
017303314
017305402
017304205
017303306
017303317
017304310
017305122
017303316
017317148
017303313
017305102
017340125
LDR
O
HDR
PI
MDR
0 80 160 240 32040
US Feet
Author: Redlands GIS Date: 9/29/2025
Legend
City Boundary
Parcels
Gener
al Plan 2035

DESCRIPTIO
Hillside Conservation
Rural Living
Resource Preservation
Very Low Density Residential
Low Density Residential
Low Medium Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Office
Commercial
Commercial/Industrial
Light Industrial
Public/Institutional
Agriculture
Parks/Golf Courses
Open Space

DESCRIPTION
Transit Village
APN
City of Redlands
Attachment B: General Plan Land Use Map
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
500 of 932
S 4th St
S 4th St
S 4th St
W Home Pl
S Eureka St
S Eureka St
W Home Pl
W Home Pl
Cajon St
S
4th St
W Home Pl
W Home Pl
E Ho
me Pl
Cajon St
Cajon St
S 4th St
S 4th St
La Ve
rne St
E Home
Pl
Carrie Ln
La Verne St
E Hom
e Pl
Cajon St
W Cypress Ave
E Cypress Ave
Cajon St
Cajon
St
Carrie Ln
Carrie Ln
La Verne St
La Verne St
Cypress Cir
E Cypress
Ave
R-2
A-P
R-2-2000
R-S
R-2
R-S
A-P
R-2-2000
E
R-S
A-P
R-S
R-2
P
R-2
R-S
T
R-2
A-P
017304320
017303309
017304111
017303419
017304304
017303417
017303304
017305406
017303318
017303312
017304317
017304211
017304311
017304313
017305408
017304113
017303310
017303323
017304215
017303418
017304323
017304217
017303416
017304204
017304206
017303315
017305410
017305404
017305230
017305413
017304312
017304318
017305414
017303411
017305403
017304112
017317118
017303311
017317147
017304212
017304302
017304301
017304214
017304209
017303413
017303412
017317139
017304305
017303414
017304213
017304207
017304208
017305409
017306128
017305415
017305407
017304308
017303319
017304309
017317140
017316140
017305401
017304316
017305405
017303409
017304319
017304321
017303406
017304314
017303415
017304307
017317117
017304210
017317119
017304216
017303408
017303305
017303407
017304306
017305101
017304315
017303314
017305402
017304205
017303306
017303317
017304310
017305122
017303316
017317148
017303313
017305102
017340125
0 80 160 240 32040
US Feet
Author: Redlands GIS Date: 9/29/2025
Legend
City Boundary
Parcels
Zoning
CA
TEGORY
Administrative
Agricultural
Single Family Residential
Multi-Family Residential
Commercial
Medical
Industrial
Transitional
Public Institutional
Airport
Specific Plan
Flood Plain
Open Space
APN
City of Redlands
Attachment C: Zoning Map
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
501 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
502 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
503 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
504 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
505 of 932
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
506 of 932

Front façade (view from Cajon Street)

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
507 of 932

Front and north side façade (view from Cajon Street)

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
508 of 932
JUDSON

SAN BNDO

UNIVERSITY
CITRUS
CHURCH
ORANGE
TEXAS
COLTON

LUGONIA

ALABAMA
CITRUS

CALIFORNIA
SUNSET
FORD

ALESSANDRO

CYPRESS CENTER

SAN TIMOTEO SAN MATEOCANYON

HIGHLAND

TERRACINA
GARDEN

LIVE OAK CANYON

REDLANDS

TENNESSEEBROOKSIDE
CAJON
I-10

CITY OF REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA

FOR RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 20792
INC.

SITETECH
SHEET 1 OF 2
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
509 of 932
LOT 7
LOT 6
LOT 8
LOT 9
LOT 5

PARK VILLA TRACT
M.B. 5/56
LOT 1
LOT 11
LOT 14
LOT 15
SHEET 2 OF 2 CITY OF REDLANDS, CALIFORNIA

FOR RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 20792
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
510 of 932
516 CAJON ST CONCRETE DRIVWAY
ALLEY
1 2
4 3

REVISIONSBY
p L
E
R
TS
AT
i
STER
i l
Eh D
GE
P
I
T
OF
DATE
05-31-2027

RENEWAL DATE
C
F
A
O
IL
NI A
R 13 EP
C
DN
S
a
.

S
M
A
y A

SIGNATURE
0 A
HCI
R
CE
4 T
07-14-2025
R.S.

R.S.

CHECKED
DATE
DRAWN
24057
JOB NO.

OF3SHEETS
8-UNITS RESIDENTIAL
516 CAJON ST.,

REDLANDS, CA
07-14-2025

NORTHNORTH

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
8-UNITS MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
516 CAJON ST., REDLANDS, CA

CERTIFICATION OF LANDSCAPE DESIGN
I hereby certify that:
(1) I am a professional appropriately licensed in the State of California to provide professional landscape design services.

The landscape design a 516 CAJON ST.
(provide street address or parcel number(s)) were prepared by me or under my supervision.
(2) The landscape design and water use calculations for the identified property comply with the requirements of the City of Redlands Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter 13.18) and the City of Redlands Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines.
(3) The information I have provided in this Certificate of Landscape Design is true and correct and is hereby submitted in compliance with the City of Redlands Water Efficient Landscape Guidelines.

Print NameDate
SignatureLicense Number
Address
TelephoneE-mail Address
Landscape Design Professional's Stamp
p L
E
R
TS
AT
i
STER
i l
Eh D
GE
P
I
T
OF
DATE
05-31-2027

RENEWAL DATE
C
F
A
O
I
L
NI A
R 13 EP
C DN
S
a
.

S
M
A
y A

SIGNATURE
0 A
HCI
R
CE
4 T
07-14-2025
05'10' 20'
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"

PHIL MAY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
2532 WALLACE AVE.

FULLERTON, CA 92831
TEL: (909)-373-1959

LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT

CONSULTANTS

FAHIM TANIOS
516 CAJON ST.,

REDLANDS, CA
TEL: (909)-228-2921

OWNER / DEVELOPER

GB ARCHITECTS
400 N. MOUNTAIN AV. # 208
UPLAND, CA 91786
TEL: (310)-562-5382

ARCHITECT

SHEET INDEX
TITLE SHEETL-1
L-2PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN
VICINITY MAP N.T.S
NEW LANDSCAPE AREA = 3,986 SQ. FT.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
511 of 932
516 CAJON ST CONCRETE DRIVWAY
ALLEY
1 2
4 3
SHRUBS
TREES

PERENNIALS

GROUNDCOVER

TREE CONTAINER SIZE QUANTITY
36" box 6 (27 %)
24" box 16 (73 %)
15 gal. 0 (0 %)
Total: 22

PROPOSED TREE SIZE CALCULATIONS
Total Proposed Trees= 22
NOTE: A QUANTITY OF 13 TREES
(69%) WILL BE EVERGREEN

REVISIONSBY
p L
E
R
TS
AT
i
STER
i l
Eh D
GE
P
I
T
OF
DATE
05-31-2027

RENEWAL DATE
C
F
A
O
IL
NI A
R 13 EP
C
DN
S
a
.

S
M
A
y A

SIGNATURE
0 A
HCI
R
CE
4 T
07-14-2025
R.S.

R.S.

CHECKED
DATE
DRAWN
24057
JOB NO.

OF3SHEETS
8-UNITS RESIDENTIAL
516 CAJON ST.,

REDLANDS, CA
07-14-2025

NORTHNORTH
05'10'20'
SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"
ALL LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MAINTAINED.

ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL RECEIVE AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM.

ALL LANDSCAPE PLANS AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL ADHERE TO CITY OF REDLANDS DESIGN GUIDELINES, CODES AND REGULATIONS.

COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

I AM FAMILIAR WITH THE REQUIREMENTS FOR

LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS CONTAINED

IN THE WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE
REGULATIONS OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS. I HAVE

PREPARED THIS PLAN IN COMPLIANCE WITH

THOSE REGULATIONS, I CERTIFY THAT THE PLAN

IMPLEMENTS THOSE REGULATIONS TO PROVIDE
EFFICIENT USE OF WATER.
p L
E
R
TS
AT
i
STER
i l
Eh D
GE
P
I
T
OF
DATE

RENEWAL DATE
C
F
A
O
IL
NIA
R 13 EP
C
DN
S
a
.

S
M
A
y A

SIGNATURE
0 A
HCI
R
CE
4 T
05-31-2027
07-14-2025
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
512 of 932

REVISIONSBY
p L
E
R
TS
AT
i
STER
i l
Eh D
GE
P
I
T
OF
DATE
05-31-2027

RENEWAL DATE
C
F
A
O
IL
NI A
R 13 EP
C
DN
S
a
.

S
M
A
y A

SIGNATURE
0 A
HCI
R
CE
4 T
07-14-2025
R.S.

R.S.

CHECKED
DATE
DRAWN
24057
JOB NO.

OF3SHEETS
8-UNITS RESIDENTIAL
516 CAJON ST.,

REDLANDS, CA
07-14-2025
ULTRACOAT COLLECTION: HEAVY-DUTY RECTANGULAR TABLE

PICNIC TABLES

ULTRASITE
1675 LOCUST ST.

RED BUD, IL 62278
TOLL FREE: 1-800-458-5872
www.ultra-site.com

PLAN VIEW

FRONT VIEW
SPECIFICATIONS:

FINISH: THERMOPLASTIC FINISH WITH POWDER COATED FRAME
FRAME MATERIAL: 1 5/8" O.D. ALL MIG WELDED FRAME
HARDWARE MATERIAL: ALL STAINLESS STEEL HARDWARE

SIDE VIEW

ISOMETRIC
SELECT DESIRED LENGTH:
6'
8'
SELECT DESIRED MOUNT:

PORTABLE

SURFACE MOUNT
SELECT DESIRED PATTERN:

DIAMOND

PERFORATED (SHOWN)
SELECT DESIRED FRAME COLOR:

ULTRA BLUE
BLUE

BURGUNDY
RED
GREEN
BROWN
BEIGE
BLACK

ROYAL PURPLE

DARK GREY

MATTE BLACK
WHITE

SKY BLUE
ORANGE

SPRING GREEN

CHAMPAGNE
YELLOW
4' (SHOWN)
SELECT DESIRED SEAT COLOR:

ULTRA BLUE
BLUE

BURGUNDY
RED
GREEN
BROWN
BEIGE
BLACK
48"
30 5/16'
18 1/4"
12"
30"
64 3/4"
1 ULTRACOAT COLLECTION: METAL RECEPTACLE, 55 GALLON

RECEPTACLES

ULTRASITE
1675 LOCUST ST.

RED BUD, IL 62278
TOLL FREE: 1-800-458-5872
www.ultra-site.com
SPECIFICATIONS:

FINISH: THERMOPLASTIC
MATERIAL: 3/4" #9 STEEL EXPANDED METAL. 11 GAUGE X 1 1/2" FLAT STRIP BORDER ON TOP AND BOTTOM *LIDS AND LINERS SOLD SEPARATELY.

SELECT DESIRED FRAME COLOR:

ULTRA BLUE
BLUE

BURGUNDY
RED
GREEN
BROWN
BEIGE
BLACK
SELECT DESIRED LID OPTION*:

RAIN BONNET

ASH URN

FLAT TOP
SELECT DESIRED LID COLOR:

ULTRA BLUE
BLUE

BURGUNDY
RED
GREEN
BROWN
BEIGE
BLACK
SELECT DESIRED PATTERN:

DIAMOND

PERFORATED
FIESTA

SLAT (SHOWN)
WAVE
36 1/2"
SELECT DESIRED INSIDE DIAMETER:
8" (SHOWN)
14"
36 1/2"
26 3/16"
26 3/16"

PLAN VIEW

FLAT TOP

FRONT VIEW

FLAT TOP

ISOMETRIC

FLAT TOP

PLAN VIEW

ASH URN

FRONT VIEW

ASH URN

ISOMETRIC

ASH URN

PLAN VIEW

RAIN BONNET

FRONT VIEW

RAIN BONNET

ISOMETRIC

RAIN BONNET
36 1/2" 26 3/16"
3 2

PLAYGROUND
4 Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
513 of 932

SOCIO-ECONOMIC EVALUATION CHECKLIST FORM

BACKGROUND

1. Project Title: Commission Review & Approval No. 972, CUP 1201, TTM 20792

2. Lead Agency Name and Address: Mailing Address:

City of Redlands City of Redlands
Development Services Department Development Services – Planning 35 Cajon Street, Suite 20 P.O. Box 3005
Redlands, CA 92373 Redlands, CA 92373

3. Contact Person and Phone Number: Nylsen Escajeda, Assistant Planner, (909) 798 – 7555 extension 2.

4. Project Location: The project site is proposed on an existing 17,038 square-foot parking lot located at 211 East Olive Avenue (APN: 0171-281-30-0000).

5. Project Sponsor's Name and Address: David Greenberger; represented by Fahim Tanios and George Botros of GB Architects, 275 Canterberry Court, Upland, CA 91784. George Botros, telephone: 909-781-1659.

6. General Plan Designation: Administrative and Professional Office (A-P) District

7. Zoning Designation: The subject property is within the Administrative and Professional Office (A- P) District. The A-P District permits residential uses subject to the Multiple-Family Residential (R- 3) District standards; therefore, the R -3 development standards will be applied to the proposed project accordingly.

8. Description of Project: The project will construct a residential condominium project consisting of eight dwelling units, with four two-story buildings totaling 11,200 square feet. The project site consists of two vacant parcels located at 516 and 532 Cajon Street. The proposal includes 16 in-unit parking spaces, four guest parking spaces, communal open space for residents, and landscape improvements.

9. Existing On-Site Land Use and Settings: The subject property is flat in topography, vacant, and unimproved.

10. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: The surrounding properties to the north, east, south, west have various single-family residential and office uses. The subject site is also located within the “Early Redlands Historic and Scenic (HD No. 3) District.

11. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement): None.

COST / BENEFIT FACTORS:

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
514 of 932
The cost benefit factors are evaluated independently using the cost benefit model. A positive or negative cost/benefit ratio will be derived by evaluating projects. A complete model used to evaluate the project is available in the Development Services Department. A summary of that analysis is provided here:

According to the Cost Benefit Model used by the City, the project is projected to result in annual residential revenues of approximately $11,445 to the City upon project implementation, and annual ongoing costs of approximately $5,909. The surplus revenue is $5,537 for a positive cost/benefit ratio of 1.94.

The complete Cost/Benefit Model results are attached herein.

PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE AND EFFECT ON THE CITY OF REDLANDS:

Identify the public infrastructure required for development of this project and identify the source(s) of funding for these improvements. Identify the effects of such development upon the City of Redlands.

a) List of public infrastructure required for the project:

The applicant will provide the infrastructure as required by the Land Use Engineering Division and the Municipal Utilities & Engineering Department. The developer will be installing all required project site frontage and any related off -site improvements. The proposed development will provide rear alley improvements.

b) Sources of funding for these improvements to include developer installed payment of impact fees, assessment districts, etc.:

The developer will be required to pay applicable Development Impact Fees and permit fees as required by the Redlands Municipal Code.

c) The effect of the project upon the City of Redlands relative to public infrastructure is as follows:

This project will utilize the existing public infrastructure systems within the City that surround the project site. This utilization of city infrastructure is offset by the payment of Development Impact Fees and the construction of infrastructure improvements to accommodate the new use on the subject property.

BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT TO THE CITY OF REDLANDS

The following is a list of benefits that can be attributed to the proposed project. The benefits may fall into the categories identified or a miscellaneous category. Each benefit identified will be described in detail with supporting reasons as to how the item benefits the community.

A. Citrus Enhancements or Preservation . Does the project preserve citrus? The following are accepted ways to enhance or preserve citrus which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provide conservation easement(s) on citrus groves the City hopes to Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
515 of 932
preserve.

2. Acquire citrus grove(s) and donate all or a portion of the grove to the City.

3. Enhance viability and productivity of existing groves by enhancing irrigation or adding frost water.

4. Maintain a viable buffer of citrus around the project (at least 3 rows).

5. Other ways to preserve citrus.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to citrus enhancement or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: No citrus currently exists on the site, as the site is entirely vacant besides a single palm tree and other smaller growth. Historic aerials and Sanborne maps don’t show any history of the site being used for orchards, this includes the surrounding area. The site is currently located within an urbanized area and is surrounded by several residential and office uses. There is no citrus or agriculture use existing on the property.

B. Cultural Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve cultural aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve cultural aspects of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Contributes to “art in public places” concept to a minimum of 1% of total project value.

2. Contributes to the alleviation of problems at cultural sites.

3. Provides an electronic library available to the public.

4. Enhances or contributes to current services or cultural resources.

5. Contribute to performing arts venues.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to cultural enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project does not propose contributions or enhancements to cult ural aspects of the community. The project will pay City established Development Impact Fees and provide additional revenue from increased property tax assessment, sales tax revenue from future residents of the 8 new dwelling units, and other revenue sources that will indirectly provide funding that would contribute to enhancing and/or maintaining some of the cultural facilities within the City.

C. Heritage Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve heritage aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve heritage aspects of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Renovates existing historic homes.

2. The project has design features which include garage doors do not face street; 50% wrap around porch on 1-1/2 sides; broad overhangs on roof; driveway located on the side of house or a circular drive; decorative wood, masonry or wrought iron fence.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
516 of 932

3. Adaptive reuse of historic structures in appropriate zones.

4. Forming a new or annexing to an existing historic district.

5. Designation of a structure as an individual historic resource.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to heritage enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project site, while vacant, does existing within the Early Redlands Historic and Scenic (HD No. 3) District. As a result, the proposal has been designed and guided by the standards set within the Historic Architectural Design Guidelines. The two primary standards were those for new constructions within a Historic District , along with the design standards of “Craftsman” style homes, which is the intended architectural style of this project. The project also followed standards set by the Secretary of the Interior’s National Park Service, or the “Standards and Guidelines for Preservation, Rehabilitation, Restoration & Reconstruction”. Additionally, because of the site’s location within a Historic District, the project was required to get a Certificate of Appropriateness. This permit requires the project to receive approval from the Historic and Scenic Preservation Commission for its architectural design. As of this study, the proposal has been reviewed twice during two separate Design Reviews that were held during the regular HSPC meeting items. These reviews had HSPC Commissioners review the submittal item for compliance with our Historic Architectural Design Guidelines and the design standards established by the NPS. After substantial comments from the first review, the applicant revised the site and architecture to address those concerns. During the second round of review, the revised design addressed most of the concerns mentioned by the HSPC Commissioners and those in public comment.

Therefore, the review process and the architectural input from the commissioners and staff will provide heritage enhancements and preservation to the site and surrounding areas because of its conformity with the Historic Architectural Design Guidelines established by the city and the design standards established by the NPS.

D. Architectural Enhancements. Does the project enhance architectural aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance architectural aspects of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provide architectural or decorative enhancements to the project which exceed normal architectural standards.

2. Trees or other landscaping amenities that exceed minimum requirements.

3. Contribution of off -site enhancements in the public right -of-way, such as sidewalk installation and street tree replacement.

4. Assisting in undergrounding of utility lines.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to architectural enhancements, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The applicant proposes to construct 8 market-rate condos with associated parking, lighting, open space area, and landscaping. The proposed residential buildings will be two stories high and are designed to resemble high-quality residential structures. The project will include on-site landscaping, trees, private and common open space, and ground-floor and Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
517 of 932
garage parking. The project will construct its required frontage improvements. The Historic Design review gives the proposal site and architectural features that compliment the neighboring areas.

E. Historic Downtown Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve the historic downtown of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve the historic downtown of the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Contributes financially to viability of core downtown within expanded downtown.

2. Renovate old buildings.

3. Within an expanded downtown extends DRBA streetscape enhancements.

4. Contributing to the restoration of original building facades of existing structures

5. Re-establishing historical “pedestrian oriented” street frontages where original buildings have been removed.

6. Provides unique adaptive use of historic building.

7. Contributes to alternative means of transportation.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to historic downtown enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: While the project is not located within the Downtown Redlands H istoric District; it is within the adjacent Early Redlands Historic and Scenic (HD No. 3) District. As a result, the proposal has undergone significant design review for compliance with this district.

This architectural cohesiveness between the two districts enhances the historic qualities of the downtown district. Additionally, the site keeps the pedestrian-oriented layout by not providing a curb cut of Cajon Street, along with forward-facing and street -engaging front facades. The proximity of the units to the downtown is a walkable and bikeable distance to commerce and activities. Additionally, the project will pay City established Development Impact Fees and provide additional revenue from increased property tax assessment, sales taxes from the future residents, and other revenue sources that will indirectly provide funding that could be utilized to enhance and/or maintain the downtown district.

F. Job Enhancements. Does the project enhance jobs for the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance jobs for the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provides jobs for the community.

2. Brings in revenue from outside the city.

3. Internship opportunities for students at universities, high school and colleges.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
518 of 932
If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to job enhancements, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project : The project would provide construction employment and the related commerce into the city.

G. Open Space Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve open space aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve open space within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Hardscape feature that enhances wildlife- water/food/ shelter.

2. Enhanced landscape on commercial project which conceals infrastructure.

3. Waterscaping which increases illusion of open space.

4. Provides open space in addition to zoning requirement.

5. Provides a Planned Residential Development

6. Provides a usable conservation easement across open space in perpetuity.

7. Preserves access for wildlife migration corridor.

8. Provides undisturbed refuge area for wildlife.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to open space enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project will provide on-site landscaping improvements and open space areas for the residents. The project site is in an urbanized area and vacant lot, with no wildlife corridors or refuge areas are located on the site. Therefore, the project does not involve the preservation of any wildlife migration corridor or other refuge area. The site was designed with the standards established by the A -P zoning district and the historic design standards set by both the city and NPS, the site will have onsite landscaping, trees, hardscape and other aesthetic features.

H. Park Enhancements or Preservation. Does the project enhance or preserve parks of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance and/or preserve parks within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Adds improved parkland.

2. Adds parkland beyond requirements.

3. Provides pedestrian and/or bike trails to parks or provides extension of existing pedestrian and/or bike trails from the project site.

4. Adds meeting rooms accessible to local groups on a frequent basis.

5. Improves or adds to existing landscape and/or street scape at or near the project site.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to park enhancements or preservation, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
519 of 932

Proposed Project: The project site proposes a 22’ front-yard with landscaping, trees, and hardscape that is adjacent to the public right -of way and the existing street scape.

Additionally, the project will pay City established Development Impact Fees and provide significant additional revenue from increased property tax assessment, sales taxes from future resident consumer activity, and other revenue sources that will directly and indirectly provide funding that may be used to benefit City parks.

I. Public Safety Enhancements. Does the project enhance public safety aspects of the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance public safety within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Security infrastructure is provided in an architecturally acceptable manner.

2. Exterior television monitoring on commercial project.

3. Provide a building site or fully equipped fire station or contributes to dedicated City account for future construction.

4. Provides significant additional fire equipment as determined by the Fire Department.

5. Provides for a police substation (subject to City approval).

6. Provides for a building site for a new facility.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to public safety enhancements, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project will include fences and a landscaping/hardscaping buffer for the public right of way. Because of the street-facing orientation of the homes, it also provides an “eyes-on-the-street” level of security, where residents are better able to see security issues for both themselves and their neighbors. It will also pay applicable Development Impact Fees which have been established by the City to fund public facilities including police. The project will also provide significant additional revenue from increased property tax assessment, sales taxes, and other revenue sources that may assist in funding police services.

J. School Enhancements. Does the project enhance schools or their operations within the community? The following are accepted ways to enhance schools within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Senior citizen development adds revenue but no impact.

2. Provides day care and after school program(s).

3. Project is close to schools serving the project.

4. Contributes equipment or other enhancements to existing day care and after school programs.

5. Assist schools with land or financing (such as Mello Roos).

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to schools, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Project Site: The project is a multi-family style condo development with a total of 8 market- Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
520 of 932
rate units. The project will contribute revenue but will not result in any significant impacts to schools. The project is on an infill lot and is not considered growth inducing in nature, either directly or indirectly. Additionally, the project will pay applicable school fees that will assist in the future funding of school facilities.

K. Traffic. Does the project reduce traffic, enhance systems to improve traffic conditions or otherwise improve traffic within the community? The following are accepted ways to improve traffic within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provide financial mitigation which helps alleviate parking problems in town, i.e., by contributing to the parking district.

2. Incorporate “traffic calming” elements into the design of the circulation system.

3. Support for alternative forms of public transportation or public transportation facilities.

4. Add biking and pedestrian access to off campus intellectual or entertainment resources.

5. Have a unique method of product/inventory delivery.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to traffic, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Project Site: The project is located on an infill lot with existing streets that provide access and off-site parking for the neighborhood. Off-site improvements have been or will be installed in accordance with the Redlands Municipal Code and the Redlands General Plan Circulation Element. The site is in walking and biking proximity to transit, the downtown, area and other significant education and employment entities in the city such as the University of Redlands and the ESRI campus. The project will also pay Development Impact Fees established by the City as a fair share contribution toward the development’s impact on the local street system.

L. Wastewater System Enhancements. Does the project enhance the wastewater system within the community? The following are accepted ways to improve the wastewater system within the community which may be determined to be a benefit to the City of Redlands.

1. Provide a dual system to use potable and non-potable water.

2. Provide financial contributions to tertiary facilities at the Wastewater Treatment Plant.

3. Improve water quality.

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to the wastewater system, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project will comply with requirements of the City of Redlands. The Applicant has not proposed any special features related to water system enhancements. The proposed project w ill be served by the City of Redlands sewer collection system. The proposed project would generate wastewater that can be discharged to a municipal system that has sufficient capacity.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
521 of 932
M. Miscellaneous Preservation or Enhancements. Does the project enhance or preserve elements within the community?

If this project provides benefit(s) that apply to enhancement or preservation of elements that are important to the City, describe in detail the benefit(s) with supporting reasons as to how the item(s) benefits the community.

Proposed Project: The project does not provide any additional enhancements or preservation of elements within the community than previously identified.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
522 of 932
S
OCIAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:

This project may create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services for those social factors checked below within the "Potentially Significant," “Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation” or "Less Than Significant" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.

___ Agricultural/Citrus Removal
___ Wildlife/Habitat
___ Traffic
___ Fire Services
___ Paramedic Services
___ Police Services
___ Downtown Impacts
___ Residential Design
___ Cultural Facilities
___ Park Facilities
___ Recreational Programs
___ Land Use Compatibility
___ Schools

DETERMINATION
On the basis of this initial evaluation:

_X_ I find that the proposed project will not create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, and no additional information or evaluation is needed.

___ I find that although the proposed project could create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project by the applicant.

___ I find that the proposed project may create unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, and additional information or evaluation is needed in the following areas:

___ I find that the proposed project has already been evaluated for socio- economic impacts and the prior evaluation adequately evaluated this project.

Signed:

_____________
Nylsen Escajeda
Assistant Planner
City of Redlands
April 2, 2024

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
523 of 932
E

VALUATION OF SOCIAL FACTORS
Explanations of all "Potentially Significant," "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated," "Less Than Significant Impact," and "No Impact" answers are provided on the attached sheets.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact

1. AGRICULTURAL/CITRUS REMOVAL.

Would the proposal:
a) Affect agricultural resources or
operations (e.g. impacts to soils or
farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
___ ___ ___ __
b) Remove active citrus groves from
production? ___ ___ ___ __

Agricultural/Citrus Removal

1. a,b) Based on historic aerial photographs and Sanborn map information, the project site was established as a residential neighborhood around 1908 and was turned into a vacant lot prior to 1980. There is no photographic evidence that orchards were ever planted on the subject property. The property is not being used for agricultural purposes and the proposed project will not remove any orchards or impact agricultural resources.

The site is currently vacant, and the surrounding neighborhood consists of commercial structures, and a majority of single-family residences.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact

2. WILDLIFE/HABITAT/OPEN SPACE
PRESERVATION. Would the proposal:
a) Eliminate or have negative impact
upon wildlife corridors? ___ ___ ___ __
b) Tend to urbanize open space
impacting preservation and ___ ___ ___ __
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
524 of 932
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
conservation of natural resources?
c) Interfere with use of recognized
trails used by joggers, hikers,
equestrians or bicyclists?
___ ___ ___ __
d) Eliminate, reduce, or have any
negative impact upon wildlife
habitat areas to include the
protection of fringe or buffer areas?
___ ___ ___ __

Wildlife/Habitat/Open Space Preservation

2.a) The project site is within an urbanized area and is not known as an area that contains biological resources or wildlife corridors. The site has been developed since at least 1908 and the surrounding parcels have been developed over the decades with a majority of single-family residential homes, commercial structures, and offices. The project site does not contain wildlife travel routes and does not affect wildlife movement as the site is largely surrounded by development.

2.b) The subject property is surrounded by residential and commercial developments to the north, east, south, and west. The site is vested in the applicable General Plan designation of Office and the proposed use is permitted within the applicable zoning district, subject to review and approv al by the Planning Commission. The project will not impact open space preservation and conservation of natural resources.

2.c) The project will not interfere with the use of recognized trails used by joggers, hikers, equestrians or bicyclists, as no trails traverse the site.

2.d) The project will not eliminate, reduce, or have any negative impact upon wildlife habitat areas to include the protection of fringe or buffer areas. The project site is currently a parking lot , located within an urbanized area, and is surrounded by commercial development of various types. Overall, the site is not a significant habitat area for any species.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
525 of 932

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact

3. TRAFFIC. Would the proposal:
a) Result in increased vehicle trips or
congestion? ___ ___ ___ ____
b) Create additional traffic so as to be
in conflict with the policies of the
General Plan?
___ ___ ___ ____
c) Does traffic impact livability of a
residential neighborhood on
streets which, due to design or
terrain features, street side
development or other factors, have
greater than usual sensitivity to
increased traffic?
___ ___ ___ ___
d) Create additional traffic so as to
increase the level of service on
roadways that are adjacent to or in
the vicinity of the project?
___ ___ ___ ___

Traffic Impacts

3.a,b,d) The proposed project will not result in any significant effects from trip generation or traffic as a result of constructing 8 market-rate condominiums. Local roads have sufficient capacity and can provide sufficient vehicle access to the project site.

Immediate access is taken off the western alleyway, which is itself accessed from either Home Court or Cypress Avenue. Regional access to the pr oject site is provided by State Route 38, Interstate 10 f reeway, and the 210 freeway. The proposed project will not create additional traffic that will increase the level of service on roadways that are within the vicinity of the project.

3.c) The project site is within an area designated for office uses. Access to the overall area and site is mainly accessed from the minor arterial Cajon Street. Traffic generated by the project will have a minimal impact on the livability of the surrounding homes or streets. On -site parking is provided and is in accordance with applicable code requirements.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
526 of 932
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact

4. FIRE AND PARAMEDIC SERVICES.

Will the proposal result in:
a) Requiring fire and paramedic services
that are beyond the current
capabilities of the Fire Department?
___ ___ __ __
b) An increase in response time for
essential fire or paramedic services to
the remainder of the community?
___ ___ __ __
c) The need for additional fire or
paramedic facilities or equipment? ___ ___ __ __

Fire and paramedic services

4.a) The proposed residential project will not require fire and paramedic services that are beyond the current capabilities of the Fire Department. According to the 2035 General Plan, the site is not within any area that is subject to a high fire hazard threat. The proposed buildings will be constructed in accordance with all Fire Code and Building Code regulations and will incorporate fixed fire protection systems which will mitigate any impacts.

4.b) The project involves the construction of 8 market-rate condominiums. The Fire Department consists of approximately 55 total sworn personnel, including eighteen 18 firefighter/paramedics and 37 firefighter/EMTs, and covers an area of 37 square miles. The existing City facilities, services, and equipment required to serve this project would be supported by the City of Redlands Fire Department . The project will not have a significant impact on fire or paramedic services to the remainder of the community. The project would be served by Fire Station No. 261 located at 525 E. Citrus Avenue (approximately 1.0 miles from the project site) and is within a minimum response time of five minutes.

4.c) Present capabilities of the Fire Department will not require additional fire or paramedic facilities or equipment as a result of this project. The project will pay Development Impact Fees which have been established by the City to fund public facilities, including fire and paramedic services. Also, the project will provide additional revenue from increased property tax assessment, sales tax revenue (which goes to the General Fund), and other revenue sources that will assist in funding fire service operations.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
527 of 932

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact

5. POLICE SERVICES. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Requiring police services that are
beyond the current capabilities of the
Police Department?
___ ___ __ __
b) An increase in response time for
essential police services to the
remainder of the community?
___ ___ __ __
c) The need for additional police facilities
or equipment? ___ ___ __ __
d) Increase in crime as a result of the
type of business? ___ ___ __ __

Police Services

5.a-d) Present capabilities of the Redlands Police Department would not be adversely impacted with the development of a multi-family residential project with 8 condominiums. Additionally, the project will pay Development Impact Fees which have been established by the City to fund public facilities, including police services, facilities, and vehicles . The project will also provide additional revenue from increased property tax assessment, sales tax revenue (which goes to the General Fund), and other revenue sources that will assist in funding police services and operations.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact

6. DOWNTOWN IMPACTS. Would the
proposal result in:
a) A reduction of the number or types of
businesses located in the downtown? ___ ___ ___ __
b) An unfair or unreasonable competitive
disadvantage to existing businesses
downtown?
___ ___ ___ __
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
528 of 932
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
c) Creation of vacant buildings and the
potential for blight? ___ ___ ___ __
d) Cause an unreasonable increase in
traffic downtown? ___ ___ ___ __
e) Economic and social effects of
businesses competing with downtown
businesses?
___ ___ ___ __

Downtown Impacts

6.a-e) The proposed development consists o f a multi-family housing project with 8 condominiums, which is located south of the City’s downtown area. The proposed project will not negatively affect the businesses located within the Downtown Business District as the proposed project is a residential project that would place residents close to the walkable downtown, in proximity of retail and commerce.

Additionally, the project proposes sufficient parking for its residents and therefore, will not impact the traffic and parking of the Downtown Business District. The proposal does not include any competing businesses and is likely to positively increase economic and social interactions within the area.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact

7. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with existing codes and or
standards? ___ ___ ___ __
b) Meet minimum point standards of the
Residential Development Allocation
process?
___ ___ ___ _N/A_

Residential Design

7.a,b) The proposed project will comply with all appliable zoning regulations, engineering and construction design standards, and California Building Code and Fire Code requirements. Verification of compliance will be done prior to building permit issuance. The provisions of the Redlands Municipal Code (Title 19) pertaining to Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
529 of 932
t
he Residential Development Allocation process are not applicable under current State law (and City Council Resolution No. 8082 adopted on May 19, 2020). No further additional information or evaluation is needed.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact

8. CULTURAL FACILITIES. Would the
proposal result in:
a) Impacts to an historic residential
structure, neighborhood, or district? ___ ___ ___ __
b) Impacts to an historic commercial
structure or district? ___ ___ ___ __
c) Impacts to cultural facilities such as
the Smiley Library, Redlands Bowl,
Lincoln Shrine, Joslyn Center,
Community Center, etc.?
___ ___ ___ __
d) Have the potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
___ ___ ___ __
e) Potential to disturb existing
religious facilities ___ ___ ___ __
f) Impact or restrict religious or
sacred uses. ___ ___ ___ __

Cultural Facilities

8.a,b) The site is within the Early Redlands Historic and Scenic (HD No. 3) District. The proposal was designed to the standards of our Historic Architectural Design Guidelines and design standards established by the NPS, along with reviewed by HSPC Commissioners for architectural compatibility. As a result, the proposal will not have signi ficant impacts to the historic district, residential structure, neighborhood, or district.

8.c) The project will not detrimentally affect any civic or c ultural facilities such as the Smiley Library, Redlands Bowl, Lincoln Shrine, Joslyn Center, Community Center, etc. The project will pay Development Impact Fees and provide an increase in revenue to the City from increased property tax assessment, sales tax, and other revenue sources that may assist in providing funding for existing cultural facilities.

Thus, the project will not have an adverse impact on cultural facilities.

8.d) No part of this project has the potential to affect unique ethnic cultural values.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
530 of 932

8 .e,f) There are no religious facilities located within or adjacent to the project site.

Therefore, no part of this project will result in impacts to existing religious facilities or restrict religious or sacred uses.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact

9. PARK FACILITIES AND
RECREATIONAL PROGRAMS. Will the
proposal result in:

a) Increases in use or demand for park
facilities or programs to include
manpower, facilities or equipment?
___ ___ __ ___
b) A ratio of parkland to population which
exceeds standards and or goals
established by the General Plan?
___ ___ __ __

Park Facilities and Recreational Programs

9.a,b) The proposed project is for 8 units and no impacts to public parks are expected for this number of units. Therefore, the project will not substantially or adversely affect existing or planned park facilities or recreational programs within the City nor create a significant new demand for additional recreational facilities. The project will pay development impact fees and provide an increase in revenue to the City from increased property tax assessment, sales taxes (which will go into the General Fund), and other revenue sources that will assist in providing funding that is used to benefit public park facilities and recreational programs.

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact

10. LAND USE COMPATIBILITY. Would
the proposal result in:
a) Land uses that are not compatible or
consistent with the General Plan? ___ ___ ___ __
b) Economic impacts on businesses and
small property owners from a project? ___ ___ ___ __
c) Physical separation or division of an
existing community? ___ ___ ___ __
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
531 of 932
Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact
d) Loss of jobs for the community? ___ ___ ___ __
e) Overcrowding of housing? ___ ___ ___ __

Land Use Compatibility

10.a) The project site has a n applicable General Plan land use designation of Office which allows residential consistent with the underlying zoning district, and the proposed project for multi-family apartments is consistent. The project utilizes the Multiple Family Residential (R-3) District. The project will not result in land uses that are incompatible or inconsistent with the General Plan.

10.b) The proposed project is residential in character and will not detrimentally affect any businesses. The project does not pose an economic impact on businesses or small property owners. The proposal is for the development of a multi-family residential project with 8 market-rate condominiums.

10.c) The proposed project has been designed to be compatible with the surrounding residential development and neighborhood and will not physically divide or separate an existing community.

10.d) The proposed project is residential in character and will not detrimentally affect any businesses. No part of this project has the potential to create a loss of jobs to the community.

10.e) The project site applies the General Plan land use designation of Office as allowed, and the proposed project for multi-family residential condominiums is consistent.

No part of this project has the potential to result in overcrowding of the current housing stock either within the project itself or within the City of Redlands.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
532 of 932

Issues and Supporting Information Sources:

Potentially
Significant
Impact
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact No Impact

11. SCHOOLS. Would the proposal result
in:
a) Creating an overcapacity in schools? ___ ___ __ __
b) The need for additional school
facilities or equipment? ___ ___ __ __
c) Land uses not consistent with or
compatible with existing educational
facilities in community?
___ ___ __ __
d) Social or academic impacts on
students resulting from school
closures.
___ ___ __ __

Schools

11.a-d) The proposed project is an 8-unit market rate multi-family residential development and any impacts to local schools would be less than significant. The project will not manifest a growth-inducing impact, as the project does not have a large potential to adversely impact schools. Additionally, t he developer will pay all applicable school impact fees as required by the local school district and will be assessed at the time of building permit issuance.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
533 of 932
RESOLUTION NO. 8731

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS APPROVING COMMISSION REVIEW & APPROVAL NO. 972, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1201, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 20792 FOR A RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM PROJECT LOCATED AT 516 CAJON
STREET (APNs: 0173-043-15-0000 AND 0173-043-16-0000).

WHEREAS, the Applicant has submitted development applications for the construction of a residential condominium project consisting of eight (8) dwelling units, within four 2-story buildings, on two vacant parcels located at 516 Cajon Street (APNs: 0173-043-15-0000 & 0173-043-16-0000) in the Administrative & Professional Office (A-P) District (the “Project” or “Project Entitlements”); and

WHEREAS, the proposed condominium development is a conditionally permitted use in the Administrative & Professional Office (A-P) zoning district (subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit) wherein the project site is located; and

WHEREAS, on October 14, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the staff report, oral report, the testimony and evidence submitted by staff and by members of the public; and

WHEREAS, on October 14, 2025, the Planning Commission recommended approval to the City Council; and

WHEREAS on or about November 3, 2025, notice of the City Council’s public hearing for the Project and the related Project Entitlements was sent by U.S. Mail to property owners within a 300- foot radius of the project site; and

WHEREAS on or about November 7, 2025, notice of the City Council’s public hearing for the Project and the related Project Entitlements was published in a newspaper of general circulation; and

WHEREAS, following the public hearing on November 18, 2025, the City Council determined that approval of the proposal is in the best interests of the public health, safety and general welfare.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

SECTION 1. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. The proposed project is exempt from environmental review in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines. There is no information or evidence that the proposed project may result in any potentially significant environmental effects, and the proposal satisfies all applicable criteria for exemption in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15332.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
534 of 932
SECTION 2. ADOPTION OF SOCIO-ECONOMIC COST/BENEFIT STUDY. The Socio- Economic Cost/Benefit Study found that the estimated net new revenues to be generated for the City can be expected to total $11,445 annually (for a positive cost/benefit ratio of 1.94) after development of the Project. The Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study found that the proposed Project would not create any significant unmitigable physical blight or overburden public services in the community, and therefore, is hereby adopted.

SECTION 3. GENERAL PLAN CONSISTENCY. The proposed Project is consistent with the existing General Plan land use designation as ‘Office’ and applicable policies.

SECTION 4. APPROVAL OF COMMISSION REVIEW & APPROVAL NO . 972.

Commission Review & Approval No. 972 is hereby approved based upon the following findings, and subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” Exhibit “B,” and Exhibit “C.”

1. The site for the intended use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the use, and all of the required yards, setbacks, walls or fences, landscaping and other features will adjust the use to those existing or permitted future uses of land in the neighborhood.

The subject property is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the proposed use, including setbacks, landscaping, private and common open space, driveways, on-site parking, lighting, utilities, and other required improvements necessary to serve the proposed use and structures. The proposed project complies with the applicable development standards for the Multiple Family Residential (R-3) District, which is applied for residential projects within the Administrative & Professional Office (A-P) District. The proposed project will be compatible with the adjacent commercial and residential uses that surround the project site.

2. The site for the proposed use relates to streets and highways which are properly designed and improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic generated or to be generated by the proposed use.

The site for the proposed use relates to streets that are properly designed and improved to carry the type and quantity of traffic that will be generated by the proposed residential structure. The existing roadways are designed to carry the type and quantity of residential traffic to be generated by the proposed use, including existing traffic from the existing commercial offices along East Olive Avenue. The subject property will be accessed from an existing alleyway on the west side of the property, which is accessed by both West Home Place and West Cypress Avenue. Additionally, the new driveway will have improvements constructed as part of the conditions of approval. The existing alleyway can accommodate the expected type and quantity of motor vehicle traffic to and from the proposed project.

3. The conditions set forth in the approval and those shown on the approved site plan are deemed necessary to protect the public health, safety and general welfare.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
535 of 932
The conditions of approval for the project will protect public health, safety, and the general welfare. Conditions of Approval are provided by the Planning Division, Building & Safety Division, and Land Use Engineering Division. The project has been designed to comply with the applicable provisions of the Redlands Municipal Code as well as the applicable California Building Code, California Fire Code, and any other applicable regulations.

SECTION 5. APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1201. Conditional Use Permit No. 1 201 is hereby approved based upon the following findings, and subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” Exhibit “B,” and Exhibit “C.”

1. That the proposed development will not adversely affect the applicable land use plans of the city.

The project site is within the Administrative and Professional Office (A-P) land use district which permits residential uses, including medium density and condominium developments. The site will comply with the development standards for the Administrative and Professional Office (A-P) District, which specify that residential land uses are permitted and conditionally permitted according to the development standards listed within Multiple Family Residential (R-3) zone and other applicable development standards contained in the Redlands Municipal Code. The Conditional Use Permit allows for conditions to be placed on the project to mitigate any potential impact to surrounding land uses.

2. That the proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare.

The proposed residential development project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare. The proposed project will be constructed in compliance with all applicable design and engineering requirements, including the California Building Code, California Fire Code, applicable provisions of the Redlands Municipal Code, and all applicable site design and engineering standards. The site and design of the project has also undergone additional design review for applicable historic design standards.

3. That the proposed development will comply to the maximum extent feasible with the regulations of the city's general plan, the applicable zoning district and the city's development standards.

The proposed development will comply to the maximum extent feasible with the regulations of the City's 2035 General Plan, the applicable zoning district, and the City's development standards. The General Plan designation for the project site is Office (O).

The Office land use category also permits residential uses consistent with the underlying zoning district, which in this case is Multiple Family Residential (R-3). The proposed development will be in conformance with the applicable development standards of the R- 3, Multiple Family Residential zone and applicable design and development standards.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
536 of 932

4. That the proposed development is appropriate at the proposed location.

The project location for the proposed residential development is within a historical neighborhood (Historic District No. 3) and along the Cajon Street corridor. This core neighborhood in Redlands has been fully developed for several decades and includes a variety of residential uses in the surrounding neighborhoods as well as professional office uses along Cajon Street.

SECTION 6. APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 20792. Tentative Tract Map No. 20792 (for condominium purposes) is hereby approved based upon the following findings, and subject to the Conditions of Approval attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” Exhibit “B,” and Exhibit “C.”

1. That the proposed map is consistent with the general plan or any applicable specific plan, or other applicable provisions of this code.

The proposed project site is designated for Office land uses on the General Plan Land Use Map. The Office land use designation includes residential uses in conformance with definition of the Office land use designation. The existing zoning designation for all subject properties is currently Administrative and Professional Office (A-P) and the General Plan land use designation as “Office (O),” and therefore, the proposed land use will be consistent with the applicable provisions of this code.

2. That the site is physically suitable for the type of development.

The project site is physically suitable for the type of development, which consists of multiple residential buildings. The site has a flat and level topography, has been previously graded and developed for urban development, and is suitable to be developed in accordance with requirements of the applicable R-3, Multiple Family Residential Zone. All on-site improvements and off-site improvements proposed as part of the project’s design will meet all applicable City standards.

3. That the site is physically suitable for the density of development.

The proposed Tentative Tract Map will combine a total of two lots and subdivide into nine new parcels for development purposes and create condominium dwelling units. The density standards for R-3 zoning allow for a maximum density of one unit for every 1,450 square feet of lot area. With a lot area of 21,760 square feet, up to 15 units are permitted on this site; however, the applicant is proposing eight condominium units. The site is large enough to accommodate the proposed perimeter improvements, open space areas, landscape areas, driveways, walkways, open space and amenities, and other site design features.

4. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
537 of 932
There are no environmental effects or impacts that will result from the project, and there is no information or evidence of any potentially significant environmental impacts. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.

5. That the design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems.

The proposed residential subdivision and is not likely to cause any serious public health problems, as the project is designed with improvements that meet all City and State building and fire codes, no objectionable emissions or odors will be associated with the development, and the project will be developed and operated in accordance with the City’s noise ordinance.

6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

The project will not conflict with any easements for the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. Existing alley right-of-way and Cajon Street right-of-way will not be affected by the proposed project or improvements.

7. Subject to Section 66474.4 of the Subdivision Map Act, that the land is not subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California land conservation act of 1965 (commencing with section 51200 of the Government Code) and that the resulting parcels following a subdivision of the land would be too small to sustain their agricultural use.

The project site and all properties are not subject to a Williamson Act Contract.

SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall become effective upon adoption.

ADOPTED, SIGNED, AND APPROVED this 18th day of November, 2025.

Mario Saucedo, Mayor

ATTEST:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
538 of 932

I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 18th day of November, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Jeanne Donaldson,
City Clerk
Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
539 of 932

EXHIBIT A

CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL

DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT

Planning Division

1. This permit/approval for the construction of a residential condominium project consisting of eight (8) dwelling units, within four 2-story buildings totaling approximately 11,200 square feet, on two vacant parcels located at 516 Cajon Street (APNs: 0173-043-15-0000 & 0173- 043-16-0000) in the Administrative & Professional Office (A-P) District and the Early Redlands Historic and Scenic Preservation District (Historic District No. 3).

2. This permit/approval shall automatically expire 24 months after the approval date (will expire on November 18, 2027) unless Developer has diligently developed the proposed project, as shown by the issuance for a grading, foundation, engineering, or building permit(s). An extension of time may be granted in accordance with Sections 18.12.140 and

18.92.090 of the Redlands Municipal Code, and Sections 17.07.110 and 17.07.120 (Subdivision Regulations) of the Redlands Municipal Code.

3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d), certain fees, dedications, reservations or exactions imposed by the City as a condition of approval of this project are subject to a statutory ninety (90) day protest period. Please be advised that the ninety (90) day protest period for those fees, dedications, reservations and exactions which are subject to Government Code Section 66020(a) has commenced to run on the date this project was approved by the City.

4. The applicant for this permit, and its successors and assigns, shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Redlands, and its elected officials, officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all claims, actions, and proceedings to attack, set aside, void or annul the approval of this permit by the City, or brought against the City due to acts or omissions in any way connected to the applicant’s project that is the subject of this permit.

This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages, fees, costs, liabilities, and expenses incurred in such actions or proceedings, including damages for the injury to property or persons, including death of a person, and any award of attorneys’ fees. In the event any such action is commenced to attack, set aside, void or annul all, or any, provisions of this permit, or is commenced for any other reason against the City for acts or omissions relating to the applicant’s project, within fourteen (14) City business days of the same, the applicant shall file with the City a performance bond or irrevocable letter of credit (together, the “Security”) in a form satisfactory to the City and in the amount of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000), to ensure applicant’s performance of its defense and indemnity obligations under this condition. The failure of the applicant to provide the Security shall be deemed an express acknowledgement and agreement by the applicant that the City shall have the authority and right, without objection by the applicant, to revoke all entitlements granted for the project pursuant to this permit. The City shall have no liability to the applicant for the exercise of City’s right to revoke this permit.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
540 of 932

5. By signing and/or using this permit, the permittee acknowledges all of the conditions imposed and accepts this permit subject to those conditions and with full awareness of the applicable provisions of the Redlands Municipal Code including Title 15 (Buildings and Construction), Title 16 (General Plan), Title 17 (Subdivision Regulations), and Title 18 (Zoning Regulations). Failure of the permittee to sign these conditions does not affect their enforceability by the City or other responsible entity. These conditions are binding upon all future property owners of the subject property.

6. This permit/approval is granted for the project plans dated August 15, 2025 (“the plans”) on file with the Planning Division. The project shall conform to the plans, except as otherwise specified in these conditions.

7. The issuance of any permits shall comply with all applicable provisions of the Redlands Municipal Code.

8. All plans submitted to the City shall reflect all Planning Commission and/or City Council approvals and any other changes required by the Commission, Council and/or staff. This condition applies to site plans, landscape plans, elevations, grading, and all other illustrations, text, or plans submitted to the City in connection with the project.

Added by Planning Commission 10/14/2025:

Outdoor lighting shall be downward facing and shall include shielding to contain glare within the subject property. Prior to issuance of a building permit(s) for each building or site improvements, the applicant shall prepare and submit a photometric plan for Plan Check.

9. No Certificate of Occupancy shall be granted for a building or phase, or building permit shall receive final approval and signature, until all applicable Conditions of Approval have been satisfied for that building or phase.

10. The applicant shall not make any modifications or changes during construction that are in conflict or contrary to the project’s approved site design, grading plan, landscape plan, or building elevations without first consulting with the Development Services Director or designee.

Added by Planning Commission 10/14/2025:

The developer shall utilize natural materials (such as wood or stone) for all exterior architectural materials, consistent with the architectural theme (Craftsman), subject to subsequent review by the Historic & Scenic Preservation Commission. No plastic or artificial materials may be used to substitute for natural materials on the exterior.

11. A copy of the approved Conditions of Approval shall be included on the cover page of the construction plans submitted to the Building Division.

12. The applicant shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws. Violations or convictions of any of those laws in connection with the use may be cause for revocation of this permit.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
541 of 932

13. Prior to issuance of a building permit, Developer shall submit final exterior building material(s) and color scheme for review and approval by the City Planner or designee.

Plans submitted by Developer with building permit applications shall show on the building elevation sheets: all exterior building materials and colors, including product and finish manufacturer name, color name and number, and surface finish type (such as: stucco with sand finish, plaster with smooth finish, etc.); trim features and dimensions around doors, windows, and other openings; exterior lighting, including all fixtures, models and numbers, and light cut sheets or manufacturer sheets; and rooftop equipment screening.

14. All landscaped areas noted on the site plan shall be permanently maintained with healthy planting material, and whenever necessary shall be replanted with suitable vegetation.

Shrubs, hedges, groundcovers, screening landscape, etc., shall be required to be maintained and/or replaced on the subject properties in substantial conformance with the approved landscape planting plan. A qualified arborist or horticulturist may be consulted.

15. Trees shall be allowed to grow to the full genetic height and habit (trees shall not be topped or overly trimmed). Trees shall be maintained using standard arboriculture practices. Trees shall be required to be maintained and/or replaced on the subject properties in substantial conformance with the approved tree planting plan. A qualified arborist or horticulturist may be consulted.

16. Plans submitted for plan check shall include an exterior lighting plan, including fixture and pole designs, for review and approval by the Development Services Director or designee.

Prior to building permit issuance, a lighting and photometric plan shall be submitted demonstrating that adequate lighting ranges will be provided throughout the development without creating light spillover, light pollution, or conflicts with surrounding factors such as tree locations, off-site or adjacent lighting.

17. Any gutters, downspouts, pipes, and other drainage appurtenances shall be designed and shall be placed (e.g., internal to the building or inside the exterior walls) so that they will not be visible from the front of the property (i.e., from public right-of-way) or other major public vantage points.

18. Utility meters shall be fully screened and incorporated into the overall architectural design of the building (e.g., interior room, cabinet with wing wall, or equivalent complete screening). Any enclosures or screening shall be architecturally treated to match the exterior of the attached structure.

19. The project site shall be kept in a weed and dust free condition throughout all periods of construction.

20. Developer shall arrange for materials collection during construction, demolition, and occupancy with the City's Solid Waste Division, or Developer shall arrange for self-hauling to an authorized facility.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
542 of 932

21. Before placing or constructing any signs on the project property, Developer shall obtain a sign permit from the City. Sign locations and illumination are subject to review and approval by the Planning Division under separate permit.

22. Prior to issuance of building permits, the Developer will need to get the approval of Major Certificate of Appropriateness No. 706, which is a permit for the approval the architectural style, design, and site layout of the proposal and it’s conformity with the Historic Architectural Design Guidelines established by the city.

Subdivision Conditions

23. This Tentative Subdivision Map shall automatically expire 36 months after the approval date for the project, unless Developer has diligently developed the proposed project, as shown by the recordation of a Final Map with the San Bernardino County Recorder’s Office. This Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map is approved for phases, and filing of multiple Final Maps may extend the expiration in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Subdivision Map Act.

24. This permit/approval is granted for the plans dated August 15, 2024 (“the plans”) on file with the Planning Division. The project shall conform to the plans, except as otherwise specified in these conditions.

25. The Final Tract Map(s) shall comply with the Subdivision Map Act and the Redlands Municipal Code (RMC).

26. The Final Tract Map(s) shall be in substantial conformance with the Vesting Tentative Tract Map and plans submitted by the applicant and placed on file in the office of the Planning Division.

27. Residential condominium construction or future condominium conversions shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 18.156, Article IV (Condominiums and Condominium Conversions), of the Redlands Municipal Code. Such requirements include but are not limited to:

a. Wall and floor-ceiling assemblies shall conform to the sound insulation performance criteria promulgated in title 25, California Administrative Code, section 1092, or its successor.
b. The consumption of gas and electricity within each dwelling unit shall be separately metered so that the unit owner can be separately billed for each utility. A water shutoff valve shall be provided for each unit.
c. All permanent mechanical equipment, including domestic appliances, which is determined by the building official to be a source or potential source of vibration or noise, shall be shock mounted, isolated from the floor and ceiling, or otherwise installed in a manner approved by the building official to lessen the transmission of vibration and noise.

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
543 of 932
d. The anchorages of the permanent mechanical equipment are to be designed to resist the lateral seismic forces, as required by the current edition of the uniform building code. Failure of the city to identify potential sources of vibration on the approval of a specific vibration system does not prevent the city from subsequently requiring additional modification to the mechanical equipment to prevent vibration or noise from being detected in other condominium dwelling units. e. The proposed condominium project shall comply with all requirements of building, fire and housing codes, zoning provisions, and other applicable regulations in effect at the time of the application (or as otherwise specified in the approved Development Agreement for the project).

28. Any application(s) for an extension of time of the above expiration date shall be filed with the Planning Division not less than 90 days prior to the expiration date and shall comply with Title 17 (Subdivision Regulations) of the Redlands Municipal Code. Upon application by the subdivider prior to the expiration of the approved or conditionally approved tentative map, the tentative map shall be automatically extended in accordance with the Subdivision Map Act.

29. Prior to Final Tract Map clearance, the applicant shall submit one (1) copy of each of the final Articles of Incorporation, Bylaws of the Homeowners’ Association, and Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) to the Planning Division for review and approval. After recordation of the final CC&Rs, two (2) copies of said recorded CC&Rs shall be submitted to the Planning Division.

30. The applicant shall include the following within the CC&Rs:

a. The CC&Rs shall identify that all sewer lines connecting each unit to the existing public sewers are privately owned, maintained, and operated by the Homeowners’ Association.

b. The CC&Rs shall designate that it is the responsibility of the Homeowners’ Association to obtain appropriate waste containers to facilitate recycling and to instruct tenants and owners on how to participate in the City’s recycling program.

c. The establishment of reserves for common area maintenance and repairs shall be provided.

d. Each condominium dwelling unit shall be provided a minimum of one (1) parking space for units up to 999 square-feet, one and one-half (1.5) parking spaces for units between 1,000 to 1,499 square-feet, and two (2) parking spaces for each unit of 1,500 square-feet or greater. Each parking space shall be located in a fully enclosed garage or parking structure. These residential tenant parking spaces shall be permanently and irrevocably assigned to particular units within the project. In addition, one -half (0.5) open guest parking spaces for each condominium dwelling unit shall be provided (and shall be located either on -site in the parking garage for the same building within which the dwelling unit is located, or within the Building 2 parking structure at the southwest corner of Redlands Boulevard and Orange Street).

Redlands Regular Meeting 11-18-25
544 of 932

e. The CC&Rs shall prohibit the storage or parking of trailers, boats, mobile homes, recreational vehicles, and inoperable vehicles.

Redlands City CouncilNovember 18, 2025

Redlands City Council
November 18, 2025