Agenda packet — Redlands City Council, April 7, 2026 (part 1 of 7)

CITY OF REDLANDS

CITY COUNCIL

A G E N D A
April 7, 2026

MARIO SAUCEDO
Mayor
District 3

MARC SHAW
Mayor Pro Tempore
District 4

PAUL BARICH
Council Member
District 5

EDDIE TEJEDA
Council Member
District 2

DENISE DAVIS
Council Member
District 1

JEANNE DONALDSON
City Clerk

PHILLIP DOOLITTLE
City Treasurer
CHARLES M. DUGGAN JR.

City Manager
YVETTE M. ABICH GARCIA
City Attorney
5:00 p.m. Open Public Meeting, Public Comment (Closed Session) 6:00 p.m. Open Session (Public Meeting)
* * *
City Council Chambers
Civic Center, 35 Cajon Street, Redlands, California

A G E N D A
The following information comprises the agenda for the regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redlands at the times noted below in the City Council Chambers, Civic Center, 35 Cajon Street, Redlands, California, on:

Tuesday, April 7, 2026
To join via Zoom on a computer, laptop, or smart device Please visit www.zoom.us, click on Join a Meeting
Enter the Meeting ID 896 2789 8341, then run the Zoom launcher To join via Zoom with audio only (cell phone or landline) Dial 1-877-853-5247
Enter the Meeting ID 896 2789 8341
Should the City lose connectivity on Zoom, we will halt the meeting until it can be restored. To check on the status of remote connectivity in the event of an outage, go to the City's website at www.cityofredlands.org or to the City's Facebook page at @CityofRedlands or the Instagram page at @CityofRedlands_CityHall.

In the event the City cannot reestablish Zoom connectivity in a reasonable amount of time, the Mayor will adjourn the meeting to a future date.

PLEASE NOTE: Anyone desiring to speak on an agendized item at this meeting may do so during the consideration of that time. Due to time constraints and the number of persons who may wish to give oral testimony, public comments will be limited to three (3) minutes.

To provide comment while participating from Council Chambers:

Although it is not required, speakers are encouraged to submit a "Speaker Sign Up Sheet" before the meeting is convened. Forms are available in the Office of the City Clerk or in Council Chambers.

After the meeting has convened, you may place the speaker form in the basket at the table along the north wall of the Chambers. Please do not disturb the City Clerk while the meeting is in progress.

To provide comment through Zoom (on a computer, laptop, or smart device) Click the "Raise Hand" button and the moderator will unmute you when it is your turn to speak To provide comment via audio only (cell phone or landline) Dial *9 to "Raise Hand". The moderator will identity you by your area code and last 3 numbers of your telephone number when it is your turn to speak.

PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES, PAGERS AND OTHER ELECTRONIC

COMMUNICATION DEVICES UPON ENTERING THE CHAMBERS
5:00 PM
A. Call City Council Meeting to Order
B. Public Comment
(Any person wishing to provide public comment on a closed session matter may do so at this time.) C. Recess City Council Meeting to a Closed Session

1. Conference with labor negotiator - Government Code §54957.6 (Assistant City Manager McConnell)
Agency Negotiators:

John Bakhit, Janice McConnell, Robert Meteau, Jorge Castillo Employee Organizations:

Redlands Association of Department Directors
Redlands Association of Management Employees
Redlands Association of Mid-Management Employees
Redlands Association of Safety Management Employees
Redlands Association of Fire Management Employees
Redlands Police Officers Association
Redlands Professional Firefighters Association
Redlands Civilian Safety Employees
Teamsters Local 1932 Redlands Chapter
D. Reconvene City Council Meeting at 6:00 p.m.

E. Invocation by Council Member Davis - Pledge of Allegiance by eAcademy Elementary School (In keeping with long-standing traditions of legislative invocations, this City Council meeting may include a brief invocation. Such invocations are not intended to proselytize or advance any one, or to disparage any other, faith or belief. Neither the City nor the City Council endorses any particular religious belief or form of invocation.) F. Closed Session Report
(No reportable action taken in closed session unless otherwise announced by the City Attorney at this time.) G. Presentations

1. Redlands Pet Adoption
(Redlands Animal Services)

2. Presentation of the Dolores Huerta Day Proclamation
(Mayor Saucedo)

3. Presentation of the National Crime Victims' Rights Week Proclamation presented to Rose Madsen, Families & Friends of Murder Victims
(Mayor Saucedo)

4. Presentation of the Earth Day Proclamation, presented to Linda Hamilton, Executive Director of ANCA, and Christy Cooper, Owner of Feel Good Market
(Mayor Saucedo)

5. Presentation of the National Autism Acceptance Month Proclamation presented to Val Noble, CEO of Unite 2 Live With Autism
(Mayor Saucedo)

6. Presentation of the Child Abuse Prevention Month Proclamation presented to Jeany Glasgow, Director of Children and Family Services
(Mayor Saucedo)

7. Presentation of the National Donate Life Month Proclamation presented to Kat Mantz, OneLegacy Ambassador
(Mayor Saucedo)
H. Public Comment - City Council
I. Consent Calendar
(The following routine items have been recommended for approval and will be acted upon simultaneously unless separate discussion and/or action is requested by a Councilmember or a member of the audience.)

1. Approve minutes of the regular meeting of March 17, 2026 (City Clerk Donaldson)

2. Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring April 10, 2026, as Dolores Huerta Day (Mayor Saucedo)

3. Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring the week of April 19-25, 2026 National Crime Victims' Rights Week
(Mayor Saucedo)

4. Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring April 22, 2026 as Earth Day (Mayor Saucedo)

5. Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of April 2026 National Autism Acceptance Month
(Mayor Saucedo)

6. Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of April 2026 as Child Abuse Prevention Month (Mayor Saucedo)

7. Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of April 2026 National Donate Life Month (Mayor Saucedo)

8. Direct Staff to Review the City of Redlands Conflict of Interest Code (City Clerk Donaldson)

9. Approve the three-year Professional Services Agreement with Policy Confluence, Inc. for the Annual Benchmark Community Survey for an amount not to exceed $73,650 (Assistant City Manager McConnell)

10. Approve the agreement between the City of Redlands and Church of Religious Science of Redlands in replacement of Steps 4 Life Community Services for transitional housing services in an amount not to exceed $30,000
(Assistant City Manager Boatman)

11. Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Architectural Resources Group, Inc. for preparation of a citywide Historical Reconnaissance Survey and subsequent Intensive-Level Historic Resource Surveys in an amount not to exceed $166,050.00; and determination that approval of the agreement is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act
(Development Services Director Reilly)

12. Adopt Ordinance No. 3001 amending Title 18 (Zoning Regulations) of the Redlands Municipal Code by revising the zoning map (Zone Change No. 482) to change the zoning designation of 8.5 gross acres located on the north side of west Lugonia Avenue, east of Tennessee Street (APN: 0167-171-16-0000, 0167-171-11-0000, and 0167-171-12-0000) to General Commercial (C-3) District (Development Services Director Reilly)
J. Public Hearings

1. Consideration of a request to approve: Amendment No. 8 to Concept Plan 1 and Planned Development No. 6 for a 983,000-square-foot, multistory medical center expansion project (general hospital and medical offices); certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project; and adoption of CEQA Findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program. The project site is located at 1301 California Street (APN: 0167-441-07-0000). Proposed Use:

Hospital and Medical Offices. Applicant: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (Development Services Director Reilly)
K. New Business

1. Consideration of Resolution No. 8766 authorizing the City's participation the San Bernardino Regional Housing Trust Fund Joint Powers Agreement (JPA)
(Assistant City Manager Boatman)

2. Consideration of Resolution No. 8768 approving Agreements for the Redlands Police Department Safety Hall Project (Phase 1) for a total amount not to exceed $3,494,000; an additional appropriation in the amount of $3,494,000 to the Safety/City Hall Replacement Fund; and determine that approval is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act
(Assistant City Manager Boatman)

3. Consideration of a Professional Services Agreement with Geocon West, Inc., for Special Inspection Services for the City's new Police Department Safety Hall Facility; an additional appropriation in the amount of $764,000 from the General Fund Reserve for Future Facilities; and determination that approval of the agreement is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines
(Assistant City Manager Boatman)

4. Consideration of a First Amendment to the Agreement with Western A/V, for the provision of Council Chambers Audio-Video System to increase the total agreement from $533,315.95 to an amount not to exceed $581,838.37
(Assistant City Manager Boatman)

5. Consideration of Approval of a Parking License Agreement with Town Square Development Group, LLC, for public parking at the Redlands Mall Property (Approximately $349,008 Annually) (Assistant City Manager Boatman)

6. Consideration of a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Eurofins Eaton Analytical, now Eurofins Drinking Water and Wastewater West, LLC to increase the compensation amount by $80,000 for the First Extended Term, increasing the total compensation to a not to exceed amount of $440,000, and authorize an additional appropriation in the amount of $40,000 from the Water Fund and $40,000 from the Wastewater Fund
(Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director Heredia)

7. Consideration of a Public Works Construction Contract with R&J Construction, LLC., for the Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Hillside Stabilization and Stairway Improvements Project for an amount not to exceed $449,236, and determination that the Project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15304 of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director Heredia)

8. Consideration of the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Hicks & Hartwick, Inc. to increase the Extended Term compensation to $197,000, increasing the total compensation to a not to exceed amount of $297,000, and authorize an additional appropriation of $97,000 from the Streets General Fund
(Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director Heredia)

9. Consideration of approval of the sole source purchase of the Dispatch Console Radio upgrade to Command Central AXS in the amount of $370,436.22 and authorization of an additional appropriation in the same amount
(Police Chief Tolber)

THIS ITEM WAS REMOVED FROM THE AGENDA AND NOT HEARD

10. Consideration of an intergovernmental purchase of networking equipment for the State Street City Hall building in the amount of $277,448 from GovConnection
(Management Services/Finance Director Garcia)
L. Individual Council Member Announcements and/or Reports on Activities (No collective discussion or action.)

1. Individual Council Member Report on Activities for March 2026 from Mayor Pro Tem Shaw (City Clerk Donaldson)
M. Adjournment
If you challenge any proposed development entitlement listed on this agenda in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to this public meeting.

In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact Goutam Dobey, of the Municipal Utilities and Engineering Department at (909) 798-7584 ext 2. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting.
(28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title II)
Any writings or documents distributed to a majority of the City Council Regarding an open session agenda item less than 72 hours before this meeting are available for public inspection at the City Clerk's Office or at the dais of the City Clerk once the open session begins.

Staff reports or other written documentation relating to items referred to on the agenda are available at the A. K. Smiley Public Library, 125 West Vine Street, Redlands, California, and on the City's Website referenced below.

Regular meetings are televised live on Redlands TV Channel 3 (Spectrum) and Channel 35 (Frontier) and re-broadcast at 7:00 P.M. The following Wednesday, Friday and Sunday; and at 9:00 A.M. Thursday, Saturday, and Monday. Meetings are also streamed live and archived for later viewing on demand on the City's website at www.cityofredlands.org. Agendas, staff reports and minutes of the City Council of the City of Redlands are available online at: www.cityofredlands.org Date Posted: April 2, 2026
City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I1.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve minutes of the regular meeting of March 17, 2026 (City Clerk Donaldson) MOTION:

I move to approve the regular meeting minutes of March 17, 2026.

Attachments
City Council-03-17-2026-minutesDraft.pdf

MINUTES
Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Redlands held in the Council Chambers, Civic Center, 35 Cajon Street, on Tuesday, March 17, 2026 at 5:00 P.M.

Present: Mario Saucedo, Mayor
Marc Shaw, Mayor Pro Tempore
Paul Barich, Council Member
Eddie Tejeda, Council Member
Denise Davis, Council Member
Staff:

Charles M. Duggan, Jr., City Manager; Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney; Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk; Phillip Doolittle, City Treasurer; Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager; Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager; Carl Baker, Public Information Officer; Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director; Rich Sessler, Fire Chief; Sean Flynn, Police Commander; Tabitha Crocker, Facilities and Community Services Director; Robert Meteau, HR/Risk Management Director; Ray Casey, Interim Municipal Utilities and Engineering Director; Sean Reilly, Development Services Director
A. Call City Council Meeting to Order
Mayor Saucedo called the meeting to order and explained that comments could be presented in-person, via Zoom, via cell phone or landline. He offered the public an opportunity to provide comment on any item on the agenda for the closed session.

B. Public Comment
There was no public comment.

C. Recess City Council Meeting to a Closed Session

1. Performance Evaluations of Public Employees – Government Code §54957(b)(1) Position: City Manager

2. Conference with labor negotiator - Government Code §54957.6 Staff requested Item C.2 be removed from the Closed Session agenda. Consideration of this matter will be scheduled for a future meeting.

3. Conference with legal counsel: Existing Litigation - Government Code §54956.9(d)(1) (City Attorney Garcia) D. Reconvene City Council Meeting at 6:00 p.m.

Mayor Saucedo reconvened the meeting at 6:00 P.M. He announced the City Council agreed to continue Closed Session discussion and to reconvene Closed Session following the conclusion of the City Council meeting.

E. Invocation by Mayor Pro Tem Shaw - Pledge of Allegiance by Kingsbury Elementary School F. Closed Session Report
See below.

G. Presentations
In honor of Cesar E. Chavez, Mayor Saucedo read aloud from the official proclamation declaring March 31, 2026 as Cesar E.

Chavez Day in Redlands.

H. Public Comment
Burro Attacks - Dorre Yamashiro raised attention to a series of mutilations in the wild burro population that live in San Timoteo and Reche Canyon areas. The injuries sustained have been catastrophic and there is a reward for information leading to the capture of those committing these crimes. She urged the City to partner with Donkeyland, a sanctuary for burros, to protect these animals.

I. Consent Calendar

1. Approve minutes of the regular meeting March 3, 2026 On motion of Council Member Tejeda, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Shaw, the City Council, by roll call vote, approved the regular meeting minutes of March 3, 2026.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed

2. Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring March 31, 2026, as Cesar E. Chavez Day On motion of Council Member Tejeda, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Shaw, the City Council, by roll call vote, authorized the issuance of a proclamation declaring March 31, 2026, as Cesar E. Chavez Day.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed

3. Approve the purchase of a 2014 Chevrolet Van Ambulance from the Big Bear Fire Authority in the amount of $20,000 and approve a supplemental appropriation for the same amount from the General Fund unassigned fund balance On motion of Council Member Tejeda, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Shaw, the City Council, by roll call vote, approved the purchase of the 2014 Chevrolet Van Ambulance from the Big Bear Fire Authority in the amount of $20,000, and authorize the City Manager to execute all necessary documents to complete the transaction; and approved an additional appropriation in the amount $20,000 from the unassigned fund balance in the General Fund to cover the cost of the purchase.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed

4. Adopt Resolution No. 8756 dissolving the Redlands Financing Authority and terminating the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated May 1, 1999
On motion of Council Member Tejeda, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Shaw, the City Council, by roll call vote, adopted Resolution No. 8756 dissolving the Redlands Financing Authority (RFA); and approved the termination of the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated May 1, 1999 creating the RFA.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed

5. Approve the Termination of License Agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental, LLC for the use of 30 parking spaces on City-owned property located at 1625 W. Redlands Blvd. and Authorize the City Manager or designee to sign the Letter of Termination of a License Agreement
On motion of Council Member Tejeda, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Shaw, the City Council, by roll call vote, terminated the License Agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental; and authorized the City Manager or designee to sign the Letter of Termination of a License Agreement with Avis Budget Car Rental.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed

6. Approve a $50,000 contribution for the 2026 Fourth of July Celebration to the Redlands 4th of July Committee and determine that the financial support serves a public benefit and approve the additional appropriation in the amount of $50,000
On motion of Council Member Tejeda, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Shaw, the City Council, by roll call vote, approved a contribution of $50,000 for the 2026 Fourth of July Celebration to the Redlands 4th of July Committee and determine that the financial support serves a public benefit; and approved the additional appropriation in the amount of $50,000.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
J. Communications

1. Discussion and possible action relating to the designation of Voting Delegates to represent the City at the 2026 Regional Conference of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and General Assembly Mayor Saucedo opened the discussion to consider designating a Voting Delegate to represent the City.

On motion of Mayor Saucedo, seconded by Council Member Barich, the City Council unanimously designated, by roll call vote, Mayor Pro Tem Shaw to serve as the voting delegate at the 2026 Regional Conference of the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG); and designated Council Member Davis to serve as the alternate voting delegate at the 2026 Regional Conference of SCAG.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed

2. Annual Report of the Cultural Arts Commission given by Chairman Daniel Gohman Chairman Daniel Gohman provided the Annual Report of the Cultural Arts Commission, identifying Commission members and the Commission's Mission and Initiatives. These include efforts to collaborate and promote public interest in the arts, recommend new art programs, and recommend policies to encourage, develop, and support the Arts in Redlands. Initiatives consist of the Art on Loan Program, Artlands REACH (Regional Eco-Arts Community Hub), Artist-In-Residency Program and the Community Garden at Sylvan Park. In collaboration with the City's consultant, the Commissioners dedicated significant time and effort to the development and approval of the Art and Culture Master Plan. He provided an overview of the plan's objectives and stated the plan has been proposed to the City Council for their final endorsement. Mayor Saucedo and Council Member Davis thanked Chair Gohman and expressed their appreciation of the Commission's work.

3. Receive and file the Annual Report from the Measure T Citizens' Oversight Committee for FY 2025 Chairwoman Ruth Cook and Committee Member Ed Millican presented the annual report of the Measure T Citizens' Oversight Committee for FY 2025. During FY 2025, the City collected $20,337,840 from Measure T sales tax, surpassing the budget estimate by about $194,840, which indicates a stable local economy. The Measure T Citizens' Oversight Committee reviewed the City Manager's Proposed Budget and confirmed that funds were spent according to budget plans. The review included updates on homelessness initiatives, infrastructure improvements, public safety staffing, and park enhancements. The Committee recognizes the importance of Measure T in supporting city services and infrastructure projects. Overall, the funds have been used as intended, with transparent information provided by City staff. The Committee appreciates the residents' support, which ensures stable funding for essential services and infrastructure improvements, and looks forward to continued progress.

Council Members thanked the Committee Members for their dedication and commitment to the City. The City Council agreed, without objection, to receive and file the annual report from the Measure T Citizens' Oversight Committee for FY 2025.

4. Receive and file FY 2026 Mid-Year General Fund Review Management Services/Finance Director Garcia gave a broad overview of the Mid-Year General Fund Budget for Fiscal Year 2026. She explained the review provided an opportunity to evaluate the City’s financial performance in the current fiscal year relative to the Adopted FY 2026 Budget, using actual results from the first seven months of FY 2026. She reviewed the recommendations, analyzed the financial outcomes from FY 2025, assessed the City’s current fiscal standing, and considered the broader economic conditions and other key factors that may influence the General Fund going forward. The City enters the second half of FY 2026 on solid financial footing. Through January 31, 2026, the City's revenues and expenditures are generally tracking consistent with historical seasonal patterns. No material year-end variances are currently anticipated.

Looking ahead, three significant commitments will define the City's near-term fiscal course. First, the City is entering into negotiations with all nine employee bargaining units, whose MOUs are approaching expiration. Combined with an ongoing Classification and Compensation Study, labor costs (the City's largest General Fund expenditure) will require careful and fiscally responsible deliberation. Second, construction of the long-awaited Safety Hall at 1625 W.

Redlands Boulevard, the former Kmart site, is scheduled to begin in July 2026, with completion anticipated in summer 2028. This investment marks a generational commitment to the Redlands Police Department and the community it serves. Third, formal deliberations and presentations to the City Council and public on the FY 2027 & 2028 Biennial Budget will begin in May and June 2026, providing the appropriate forum to address all emerging cost pressures in a structured and transparent manner.

Mayor Saucedo expressed his appreciation for the thorough presentation and report. The City Council agreed, without objection, to receive and file this report.

K. Public Hearings

1. Public Hearing to consider the following applications for an approximately 8.5-acre site located at the northeast corner of Lugonia Avenue and Tennessee Street within the Special Development (EV/SD) District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan (APNs: 0167-171-16-0000, 0167-171-11-0000, and 0167-171-12-0000), by applicant Regency Centers: a) Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program in accordance with Section 15074 of the California Environmental Quality Act b) Measure U Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study c) Amendment to the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan to remove the project site (8.5 acres) from the boundaries of Specific Plan 40 and remove the Special Development (EV/SD) District designation d) To change the zoning designation 8.5-acre project site from Special Development (EV/SD) District to General Commercial (C-3) District e) A site plan approval and architectural design review to construct a commercial shopping center with approximately 71,400 square feet of commercial space consisting of one major tenant grocery building (36,000 square feet), one drive-through restaurant building (3,900 square feet), four multitenant shop buildings (6,600 to 10,000 square feet) and related on-site and off-site improvements including a parking lot, driveways, landscaping, lighting, utilities and drainage improvements f) A Conditional Use Permit to establish a Type 21 (Off-Sale General) Alcoholic Beverage Control license for a proposed 36,000 square-foot grocery store and to construct and operate a 3,900 square foot drive-through restaurant g) A request to merge three parcels within the project site into one parcel totaling approximately 8.5 acres
Mayor Saucedo declared the meeting open as a public hearing and called on Development Services Director Sean Reilly, who detailed the applications for an approximately 8.5-acre site, located at the northeast corner of Lugonia Avenue and Tennessee Street, by applicant Regency Centers. On January 13, 2026, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project and voted 7 to 0 to adopt Resolution No. 1732, recommending the City Council approve the proposed entitlements for the project. Four conditions of approval were added to address the Commissioners' concerns related to vehicle circulation within the project, pedestrian access, and the proposed architecture of the drive-through facing Tennessee Street.

The proposal includes approximately 71,400 square feet of commercial space divided between six buildings, which includes a grocery store anchor tenant (36,000 sq. ft.), a drive-through building (3,900 sq. ft.) and four multi-tenant shops buildings ranging in size from 6,600 to 10,000 sq. ft. The project also includes related on-site and off-site improvements such as parking lot improvements, access driveways, landscaping, lighting, utilities and drainage improvements.

Mayor Saucedo expressed concerns regarding the traffic flow as vehicles would exit the development onto Tennessee Street, and recommended the Applicant explore the possibility of incorporating public art and include elements from the City's citrus heritage, to enhance the aesthetic appeal of the plain walls at the drive-through site. Mayor Pro Tem Shaw also offered his concerns related to traffic and wondered about adding a protected leftturn pocket.

Regency Centers Traffic Engineering Consultant Rawad Hani responded to Council Member questions and proposed the idea of prohibiting left turns when exiting onto Tennessee. Additionally, he suggested the implementation of traffic calming measures to improve safety and manage traffic flow effectively. Ray Kayacan, representing Regency Centers, mentioned that the project includes a comprehensive landscaping design intended to enhance the overall aesthetic appeal and break up the appearance of plain walls, and he expressed a willingness to incorporate public art into the design.

As public comment, John Malcolm wondered how the developer was addressing the limited electrical infrastructure capacity at this project location. Mr. Kayacan reported that the developer is actively engaged in discussions with Southern California Edison to address the issue of insufficient infrastructure capacity, and they are in the process of seeking an economically viable power source. With no further comments, Mayor Saucedo closed the public hearing.

On motion of Council Member Tejeda, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Shaw, the City Council, by roll call vote, adopted Resolution No. 8752 to approve entitlements for the Regency Centers Redlands Marketplace project; and introduced Ordinance No. 3001. It was noted the Applicant would work with staff to incorporate public art for certain areas of the project.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed

2. Public Hearing to Consider Resolution No. 8758 Overruling Objections and Proceeding with the Weed Abatement of Subject Properties
Mayor Saucedo declared the meeting open as a public hearing and called on Fire Chief Sessler for a report on Resolution No. 8758. Beginning in February, Community Risk Reduction staff conducted inspections of parcels throughout the City to identify fire hazards, finding approximately 130 parcels that required abatement. Notice was provided to each affected property owner, allowing 14 days to abate the nuisance. Property owners were advised that failure to comply would result in the City abating the property, with associated costs assessed against the property as a lien until paid. Resolution No. 8758 will authorize the City to proceed with abatement of the identified parcels found to be in violation. Continued abatement efforts mitigate the threat of wildland fires, which can overwhelm firefighting resources and contribute to the destruction of homes and property. With no further discussion, Mayor Saucedo closed the public hearing.

On motion of Mayor Pro Tem Shaw, seconded by Council Member Davis, the City Council, by roll call vote, adopted Resolution No. 8758, overruling objections and proceeding with the abatement of subject properties.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
L. New Business

1. Consideration of Resolution No. 8757 Updating the City's Fund Balance Policy and Rescission of Resolution No. 7346 Management Services/Finance Director Garcia presented Resolution No. 8757 adopting an updated Fund Balance Policy. Resolution No. 8757 adopts an updated Fund Balance Policy to clarify that certain General Fund surplus setasides are discretionary and subject to City Manager recommendation and City Council action. The proposed update is intended to clarify the policy framework and align the written language with the City’s established procedures, while maintaining consistency with GASB 54 fund balance classifications. Under the updated policy, year-end fund balance actions would continue to be implemented through City Council approval during the normal budget cycles.

On motion of Council Member Barich, seconded by Council Member Davis, the City Council, by roll call vote, approved Resolution No. 8757 adopting an updated Fund Balance Policy and rescinding Resolution No. 7346.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed

2. Consideration of the recommendation for appointment of three (3) Trustees to the Board of the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation
Management Services/Finance Director Garcia explained that the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation (RPIC) is a California nonprofit public benefit corporation formed in 1985 to support public improvement financing and related municipal purposes. Its Bylaws were adopted in August 1985 and remain in effect. The Board is required to consist of three trustees, and the powers of the Corporation are exercised by that Board.

The City is currently advancing the construction of a new Redlands Police Department Safety Hall facility. As part of that process, the City is evaluating financing structures commonly used for municipal capital projects of this scale, including lease revenue bond or certificate of participation structures. Because the Corporation has not met in many years, all trustee positions are currently vacant. Pursuant to Article IV of the Bylaws, the Board must consist of three (3) trustees designated by the City Council.

Appointment of three trustees will allow the Corporation to:

Convene and organize,
Review its current Bylaws and update, as necessary,
Take action, if directed, in support of the Safety Hall financing.

On motion of Mayor Saucedo, seconded by Council Member Tejeda, the City Council, by roll call vote, appointed Mayor Pro Tem Shaw, Council Member Barich and Council Member Davis to serve as Trustees on the Board of the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation pursuant to its Bylaws.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed

3. Consideration of Resolution No. 8767 Amending the Bylaws of the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation Management Services/Finance Director Garcia introduced Resolution No. 8767 Amending the Bylaws of the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation. The Redlands Public Improvement Corporation (RPIC) was originally established to assist the City in facilitating the financing of public capital improvements. As the City prepares to advance the Redlands Police Department Safety Hall (RPDSH) project, the RPIC may serve an important role in supporting a potential Certificates of Participation (COPs) financing structure. In order for the RPIC to function effectively in this capacity, certain updates to its governing bylaws are necessary to align its structure with the City’s current administrative framework and operational practices.

The most significant change relates to the composition of the Board of Trustees. Under the original bylaws adopted in 1985, the Corporation was governed by a three-member board appointed by the City Council for staggered threeyear terms. The amended bylaws instead provide that the members of the Redlands City Council shall serve ex officio as the members of the Board of Trustees, with each trustee’s term automatically tied to their service on the City Council. This change simplifies governance and ensures that the Corporation’s actions remain directly accountable to the City’s elected officials.

On motion of Mayor Pro Tem Shaw, seconded by Council Member Tejeda, the City Council, by roll call vote, adopted Resolution No. 8767.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed

4. Consideration of a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc., for Master Construction Management Services for State Street City Hall to increase the total agreement to an amount not to exceed $2,108,510, approval of an additional appropriation, and determination that this action is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act
Assistant City Manager Boatman explained the need for a First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc., for Master Construction Management Services for State Street City Hall to increase the total agreement to an amount not to exceed $2,108,510. In December 2024 City Council approved a Professional Services Agreement with Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc. for Master Construction Management Services for State Street City Hall. Since that time, Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc., has provided pre-construction evaluation of the designs as the development of the new City Hall Facility has progressed. The proposed First Amendment to the Agreement with Tilden-Coil Constructors reflects additional pre-construction services and associated cost adjustments resulting from an extended design period necessary to obtain fully biddable and approved construction documents.

On motion of Council Member Tejeda, seconded by Council Member Barich, the City Council, by roll call vote, determined that approval of the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc., is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act; approved the First Amendment to the Professional Services Agreement with Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc. for Master Construction Management Services for State Street City Hall to increase the total agreement to an amount not to exceed $2,108,510; and approved an additional appropriation of $745,152.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed

5. Consideration of a First Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Sartin Properties, LLC Assistant City Manager Boatman offered context surrounding the First Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Sartin Properties, LLC, stating that on March 3, 2026, the City Council approved a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Sartin Properties, LLC for the sale of the property. The buyer has indicated that the intended use of the property will be agricultural. The proposed First Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Agreement increases the purchase price from $250,000 to $300,000 so that the purchase price aligns with the appraised value of the property. The amendment also provides that the City will pay customary closing costs associated with the transaction. All other terms of the previously approved agreement remain unchanged.

On motion of Council Member Barich, seconded by Council Member Tejeda, the City Council, by roll call vote, approved the First Amendment to the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Sartin Properties, LLC.

Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
M. Individual Council Member Announcements and/or Reports on Activities Council Members expressed their deep gratitude for everyone involved with the Community Day of Service held on Saturday at Ford Park. There were close to 600 people working, shoveling, digging, and raking, making the park look beautiful. A big thanks went to Redlands Kiwanis Club for feeding the hungry workers.

N. Adjournment
The City Council meeting recessed to continue Closed Session discussion at 7:24 P.M.

The City Council reconvened at 8:00 P.M..

Closed Session Report: City Attorney Garcia announced the following actions: C.1 - No reportable action; C.2 - The item was removed from the agenda; C.3 - No reportable action.

There being no further action required, the meeting adjourned at 8:01 P.M. The next regular meeting of the City of Redlands City Council will be held on April 7, 2026.

O. Redlands Public Improvement Corporation

1. Call regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation Chair Saucedo opened the regular meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation (RPIC) and offered the public an opportunity to address them on any subject within its jurisdiction, which is not already scheduled on the agenda.

2. Public Comment - Redlands Public Improvement Corporation There was no public comment.

3. Consideration of Resolution No. 2026-01 Amending Bylaws of the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation City Manager Duggan briefly reviewed Resolution No. 2026-01 amending and restating the Bylaws for the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation. The Redlands Public Improvement Corporation (“RPIC” or “Corporation”) is a nonprofit public benefit corporation established by the City of Redlands to assist the City in financing, acquiring, and constructing public improvements that benefit the health, safety, and welfare of the City and its residents. The Corporation may participate with the City in financing structures such as leases or other arrangements that support the delivery of municipal capital projects.

In connection with the potential use of the Corporation to support future municipal financing activities, Amended and Restated Bylaws for the Corporation were prepared. The amendments modernize the governance structure of the Corporation while maintaining the original organizational framework established when the Corporation was formed. Key updates include aligning the membership of the Board of Trustees with the members of the Redlands City Council, who will serve as ex officio, and designating the officers of the Corporation to correspond with existing City leadership positions, including the Mayor as Chair of the Board, the City Manager as President, the City Clerk as Secretary, and the City Treasurer as Treasurer.

The amended bylaws also clarify meeting procedures and administrative provisions, including establishing that the Board will hold at least one regular meeting annually and that all meetings will comply with the requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act. These updates are intended to ensure that the Corporation can operate efficiently and transparently when needed to support City financing activities while maintaining alignment with the City’s governance structure. Adoption of the resolution will approve the Amended and Restated Bylaws and allow them to stand as the governing bylaws of the Corporation, subject to approval by the Redlands City Council as required by the bylaws.

On motion of Board Member Barich, seconded by Board Member Davis, the RPIC Board of Directors, by roll call vote, approved Resolution No. 2026-01 amending and restating the Bylaws for the Redlands Public Improvement Corporation.

Vote: 3 - 0 Passed

4. Adjourn Redlands Public Improvement Corporation
There being no further action required the meeting adjourned at 8:04 P.M.

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I2.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring April 10, 2026, as Dolores Huerta Day (Mayor Saucedo )
MOTION:

I move to authorize the issuance of a proclamation declaring April 10, 2026, as Dolores Huerta Day in the City of Redlands.

Attachments
Dolores Huerta Day 2026.pdf

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I3.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring the week of April 19-25, 2026 National Crime Victims' Rights Week (Mayor Saucedo )
MOTION:

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring the week of April 19-25, 2026 National Crime Victims' Rights Week.

Attachments
National Crime Victims’ Rights Week 2026.pdf

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I4.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring April 22, 2026 as Earth Day (Mayor Saucedo ) MOTION:

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to authorize the issuance of a Proclamation declaring April 22, 2026 as Earth Day in the City of Redlands.

Attachments
Earth Day 2026.pdf

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I5.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of April 2026 National Autism Acceptance Month (Mayor Saucedo )
MOTION:

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of April 2026 National Autism Acceptance Month.

Attachments
National Autism Month 2026.pdf

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I6.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of April 2026 as Child Abuse Prevention Month (Mayor Saucedo )
MOTION:

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of April 2026 as Child Abuse Prevention Month in the City of Redlands.

Attachments
Child Abuse Prevention 2026.pdf

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I7.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of April 2026 National Donate Life Month (Mayor Saucedo )
MOTION:

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to authorize issuance of a proclamation declaring the month of April 2026 National Donate Life Month.

Attachments
National Donate Life Month April 2026.pdf

City
Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I8.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Direct Staff to Review the City of Redlands Conflict of Interest Code (City Clerk Donaldson) MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to direct staff to review the Conflict of Interest Code for the City of Redlands.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council of the City of Redlands direct staff to review its Conflict of Interest Code in accordance with Section 87306.5 of the
California Government Code.

DISCUSSION:

No later than July 1st of each even-numbered year, Section 87306.5 of the California Government Code requires the City Council to direct the local agency to review its Conflict of Interest Code and submit a Biennial Report no later than October 1st.

ALTERNATIVES:

The Council may continue this matter to a future City Council Meeting held before July 1, 2026.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Not Applicable
SUBMITTED BY:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk

FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year: 2026/27
Discussion:

Approval to direct staff to review the Conflict of Interest Code will have no impact on the City of Redlands General Fund.

Attachments
Government_Code_5318.pdf
Resolution_No_8628_Conflict_of_Interest_Code.pdf
State of California

GOVERNMENT CODE
Section 87306.5
87306.5. (a) No later than July 1 of each even-numbered year, the code reviewing body shall direct every local agency which has adopted a Conflict of Interest Code in accordance with this title to review its Conflict of Interest Code and, if a change in its code is necessitated by changed circumstances, submit an amended Conflict of Interest Code in accordance with subdivision (a) of Section 87302 and Section 87303 to the code reviewing body.
(b) Upon review of its code, if no change in the code is required, the local agency head shall submit a written statement to that effect to the code reviewing body no later than October 1 of the same year.
(Added by Stats. 1990, Ch. 1075, Sec. 5.)

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

AUTHENTICATED

ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I9.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve the three-year Professional Services Agreement with Policy Confluence, Inc. for the Annual Benchmark Community Survey for an amount not to exceed $73,650 (City Manager Duggan)
MOTION:

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with Policy Confluence, Inc., for an amount not to exceed Seventy-Three Thousand Six Hundred Fifty dollars ($73,650).

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends the City Council approve a three-year Professional Services Agreement with Policy Confluence, Inc., for the Annual Community Benchmark Survey for an amount not to exceed Seventy-Three Thousand Six Hundred Fifty dollars ($73,650).

DISCUSSION:

In July, 2021, as part of a comprehensive approach toward the development of a strategic vision for the City of Redlands, the City Manager's Office contracted with Policy Confluence, Inc. (Polco), to conduct a community-wide survey. The survey instrument known as the National Community Survey (NCS), includes standard questions for measuring resident satisfaction levels and perceptions about the quality of local government services and four custom questions. The NCS is the only resident survey tool endorsed by the International City/County Management Association (ICMA) and the National League of Cities (NLC).

In February 2022, the City again contracted with Polco to conduct the NCS. The survey was distributed to a randomly selected sample of Redlands residents, representative of the City's demographics and spread equitably among each of the five City Council districts. The results of the NCS were presented to the City Council in January 2023. Recognizing the value of continuity in evaluating community satisfaction in a scientifically validated survey against a constant set of benchmarks, the City entered into a three-year agreement with Polco to continue the NCS.

In order to continue to gauge Redlands residents' satisfaction levels and perceptions of the quality of governmental services and quality of life in Redlands, staff is recommending the City continue its partnership with Polco as a single source provider for an additional three-year term. The City has contracted with Polco since 2021 and a continued partnership will result in more robust and comprehensive data collection spanning from 2021 through 2029. Council and staff will have comprehensive and comparative data to reference and inform decision making.

ALTERNATIVES:

City Council may elect not to enter into a three-year agreement with Policy Confluence, Inc., for the annual community benchmark survey.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Supports Priority C - Equity and Inclusion
SUBMITTED BY:

Carl Baker, Public Information Officer
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Christopher Boatman, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
Dana Abramovitz-Daniel, Procurement Manager
PREPARED BY:

Betsy Montiel , Administrative Analyst

FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year: FY 2026
Revenue Generating: No
Amount: $73,650
Budgeted Y/N:

Account No: 101121-6710
Additional Appropriation Required: No
Discussion:

Funding for the annual community benchmark survey is included in the FY 2026 Communications and Community Relations Budget.

Attachments
Polco_Renewal_Agreement.pdf
Polco_Professional_Services_ContractFY22.pdf
Polco_2026_NCS_Add-Ons.pdf
Polco_Proposal.pdf
Sole_Source_Form.pdf
1 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Renewal Agreement.bm.FY2526-144.03.24.2026.docx

AGREEMENT TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This agreement for the provision of community benchmark and engagement services (“Agreement”) is made and entered in this 7th day of April, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Policy Confluence, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as a “Party” and, together, as the “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Consultant agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1 – ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT

1.1 City hereby engages Consultant to provide community benchmark and engagement services for City (the “Services”).

1.2 The Services shall be performed by Consultant in a professional manner, and Consultant represents that it has the skill and the professional expertise necessary to provide the Services to City at a level of competency presently maintained by other practicing professional consultants in the industry providing like and similar types of Services.

ARTICLE 2 – SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

2.1 The Services that Consultant shall perform are more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” titled “Scope of Services,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

2.2 Consultant shall comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations in the performance of this Agreement including, but not limited to, any applicable State prevailing wage laws.

ARTICLE 3 – RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY

3.1 City designates Carl Baker, Public Information Officer, as City’s representative with respect to performance of the Services, and such person shall have the authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City’s policies and decisions with respect to performance of the Services.

ARTICLE 4 – PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES

4.1 Consultant shall perform and complete the Services in a prompt and diligent manner in accordance with the description set forth in Exhibit “A,” titled “Scope of Services,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

4.2 The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of three (3) years commencing as of June 5, 2026, unless terminated earlier as provided herein.
2 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Renewal Agreement.bm.FY2526-144.03.24.2026.docx

4.3 If Consultant’s Services include deliverable electronic visual presentation materials, such materials shall be delivered in a form, and made available to City, consistent with City Council-adopted policy for the same. It shall be the obligation of Consultant to obtain a copy of such policy from City staff.

ARTICLE 5 – PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT

5.1 Compensation: The total compensation for Consultant’s performance of the Services shall not exceed the amount of Seventy-Three Thousand Six Hundred Fifty dollars ($73,650).

City shall pay Consultant on a milestone basis up to the not-to-exceed amount in accordance with Exhibit “B,” titled (“Payment Schedule”) which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

5.2 Consultant shall submit invoices in accordance with Exhibit “B” and such invoices shall include a brief description of the Services provided. City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty (30) days after receipt and approval by City of Consultant’s invoice.

5.3 Any notice or other communication required, or which may be given, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in writing. Any such notice shall be deemed delivered (i) on the date of delivery in person; (ii) five (5) days after deposit in first class registered mail, with return receipt requested; (iii) on the actual delivery date if deposited with an overnight courier; or (iv) on the date sent by facsimile or electronic mail transmission (including PDF), if confirmed with a copy sent contemporaneously by first class, certified, registered or express mail; in each case properly posted and fully prepaid to the appropriate address set forth below, or such other address as a Party may provide notice in accordance with this section:

CITY: CONSULTANT:

City Clerk Alec Vice
City of Redlands Policy Confluence, Inc.
35 Cajon Street 1241 John Q Hammons Dr, Suite 203
P.O. Box 3005 (mailing) Madison, WI 53717
Redlands, CA 92373 [email protected]
[email protected] Phone: (608) 469-4467
Phone: (909) 798-7531
ARTICLE 6 – INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

Consultant shall provide City with certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing such insurance prior to commencement of the Services. Insurance policies shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation or modification of the policy except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City.
3 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Renewal Agreement.bm.FY2526-144.03.24.2026.docx A. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability insurance in the amount that meets statutory requirements with an insurance carrier acceptable to City, or certification to City that Consultant is self-insured or exempt from the workers’ compensation laws of the State of California. Consultant shall execute and provide City with Exhibit “C,” titled “Workers’ Compensation Insurance Certification,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, prior to performance of the Services.

B. Comprehensive General Liability insurance with carriers acceptable to City in the minimum amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate, for public liability, property damage and personal injury is required. City shall be named as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non-contributing to any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City.

C. Consultant shall secure and maintain professional liability insurance throughout the term of this Agreement in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim made.

D. Business Auto Liability coverage, with minimum limits of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence, combined single limit bodily injury liability and property damage liability. This coverage shall include all Consultant owned vehicles used in connection with Consultant’s provision of the Services, hired and non-owned vehicles, and employee non-ownership vehicles. City shall be named as an additional insured and such insurance shall be primary and non-contributing to any insurance or selfinsurance maintained by City.

E. Consultant is expressly prohibited from assigning or subcontracting any of the Services without the prior written consent of City. In the event of mutual agreement by the Parties to assign or subcontract a portion of the Services, Consultant shall add such assignee or subcontractor as an additional insured to the insurance policies required hereby and provide City with the insurance endorsements prior to any Services being performed by the assignee or subcontractor.

6.2 Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City and its elected and appointed officials, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, losses or liability, including attorneys’ fees, arising from injury or death to persons or damage to property occasioned by any negligent act or omission by, or the willful misconduct of, Consultant, or its officers, employees and agents in performing the Services.

ARTICLE 7 – CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

7.1 Consultant covenants and represents that it does not have any investment or interest in any real property that may be the subject of this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment that would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s Services. Consultant further covenants and represents that in the performance of its duties hereunder, no person having any such interest shall perform any Services under this Agreement.
4 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Renewal Agreement.bm.FY2526-144.03.24.2026.docx

7.2 Consultant agrees it is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:

A. Does not make a governmental decision whether to:
(i) approve a rate, rule or regulation, or adopt or enforce a City law; (ii) issue, deny, suspend or revoke any City permit, license, application, certification, approval, order or similar authorization or entitlement; (iii) authorize City to enter into, modify or renew a contract; (iv) grant City approval to a contract that requires City approval and to which City is a party, or to the specifications for such a contract; (v) grant City approval to a plan, design, report, study or similar item; (vi) adopt, or grant City approval of, policies, standards or guidelines for City or for any subdivision thereof.

B. Does not serve in a staff capacity with City and in that capacity, participate in making a governmental decision or otherwise perform the same or substantially the same duties for City that would otherwise be performed by an individual holding a position specified in City’s Conflict of Interest Code under Government Code section 87302.

7.3 In the event City determines that Consultant must disclose its financial interests, Consultant shall complete and file a Fair Political Practices Commission Form 700, Statement of Economic Interests, with the City Clerk’s office pursuant to the written instructions provided by the City Clerk.

ARTICLE 8 – GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

8.1 In the event any action is commenced to enforce or interpret any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement the prevailing Party shall, in addition to any costs and other relief, be entitled to the recovery of its reasonable attorneys’ fees, including fees for the use of inhouse counsel by a Party.

8.2 Consultant shall not assign any of the Services, except with the prior written approval of City and in strict compliance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. Any assignment or attempted assignment without such prior written consent may, in the sole discretion of City, result in City’s immediate termination of this Agreement.

8.3 Consultant is for all purposes under this Agreement an independent contractor and shall perform the Services as an independent contractor. Neither City nor any its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or Consultant’s employees, except as herein set forth. Consultant shall supply all necessary tools and instrumentalities required to perform the Services. Assigned personnel employed by Consultant are for its account only, and in no event shall Consultant or personnel retained by it be deemed to have been employed by City or engaged by City for the account of, or on behalf of City. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity 5 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Renewal Agreement.bm.FY2526-144.03.24.2026.docx whatsoever as an agent, nor shall Consultant have any authority, express or implied, to bind City to any obligation.

8.4 This Agreement may be terminated by City, in its sole discretion, by providing not less than five (5) days prior written notice to Consultant of City’s intent to terminate. If this Agreement is terminated by City, an adjustment to Consultant’s compensation shall be made, but (1) no amount shall be allowed for anticipated profit or unperformed Services, and (2) any payment due Consultant at the time of termination may be adjusted to the extent of any additional costs to City occasioned by any default by Consultant. Upon receipt of a termination notice, Consultant shall immediately discontinue its provision of the Services and, within five (5) days of the date of the termination notice, deliver or otherwise make available to City, copies (in both hard copy and electronic form, where applicable) of project related data, design calculations, drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries and such other information and materials as may have been accumulated by Consultant in performing the Services. Consultant shall be compensated on a pro-rata basis for Services completed up to the date of termination.

8.5 Consultant shall maintain books, ledgers, invoices, accounts and other records and documents evidencing costs and expenses related to the Services for a period of three (3) years, or for any longer period required by law, from the date of final payment to Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. Such books shall be available at reasonable times for examination by City at the office of Consultant.

8.6 This Agreement, including the Exhibits incorporated herein by reference, represents the entire agreement and understanding between the Parties as to the matters contained herein, and any prior negotiations, written proposals or verbal agreements relating to such matters are superseded by this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided for herein, any amendment to this Agreement shall be in writing, approved by City and signed by City and Consultant.

8.7 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to its conflicts of laws provisions. The Parties agree that all actions or proceedings arising in connection with this Agreement shall be tried and litigated only in the state courts located in San Bernardino County, California, and the federal courts located in Riverside County, California.

8.8 If one or more of the sentences, clauses, paragraphs or sections contained in this Agreement is declared invalid, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder of this Agreement and shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining sentences, clauses, paragraphs or sections contained herein, unless to do so would deprive a Party of a material benefit of its bargain under this Agreement.
6 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Renewal Agreement.bm.FY2526-144.03.24.2026.docx IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of City and Consultant have signed in confirmation of this Agreement.

CITY OF REDLANDS POLICY CONFLUENCE, INC.

By: __________________________ By: __________________________ Mario Saucedo, Mayor Alec Vice, Director of Account
Management
ATTEST:
__________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
7 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Renewal Agreement.bm.FY2526-144.03.24.2026.docx EXHIBIT “A”

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant Engage + Assess - The National Community Survey® All Consultant Engage features are available to City during City’s subscription term to engage with City’s target audiences. Respondents answer questions via Consultant's civic surveying and engagement platform which includes real time results and the option to have respondents verified against voter lists. As participants respond they become part of the City community's digital panel available for follow up questions, surveys, polls, and other engagement.

The Assess Module includes 1 benchmark survey per annual contract period. City’s online report will include comparisons to our National Benchmarks, and demographic and geographic comparisons (if response is sufficient by subgroup). Our customer success team will guide City’s benchmark survey process to ensure smooth implementation.

A representative sample of residents (or other appropriate stakeholders) will be invited to complete the survey to ensure statistically significant response and results. Consultant will use statistically appropriate methodologies to garner community-wide representativeness with approximately a 6% margin of error (4-6% is typical and meets best practices for performance measurement, about 250-450 responses) per local jurisdiction. The invitations will contain an introduction outlining the importance of the survey and instructions for completing it. To supplement this effort, City will be asked to participate in outreach efforts with guidance on best practices from Consultant. Responses will be statistically weighted to ensure the best representation of City’s community (or stakeholder group, if applicable):
• 3,500 Household Sample Size. 2 Part Outreach - 1 Postcard Invitation & 1 Mailed Survey Packet $18,750/Year for 3 Years
Half Page of Custom Questions
We recognize that while you are making this larger effort to get input from your residents you may want to add a few custom items.
$2,200/Year for 3 Years
Spanish Translation of Benchmark Survey
Consultant will provide a Spanish translation of your survey and publish it online. Survey invitations will provide a URL and Spanish language instructions for completing the survey online. $1,200/Year for 3 Years
8 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Renewal Agreement.bm.FY2526-144.03.24.2026.docx Remote Presentation of Results
A senior Consultant staff member will make one presentation of survey results to staff, Council, Boards, or other appropriate groups. This will be conducted on Zoom or another appropriate technology (that is feasible for both parties and suits the purpose). For this presentation, we use Microsoft® PowerPoint or Google Slides as a visual aid and a copy of the slideshow is shared with your staff for internal use. $2,400/Year for 3 Years
One Set of Custom Benchmark Comparisons
In addition to the national benchmarks (included with The NCS Online reporting), Custom Benchmarks can be purchased to compare your results to custom cohorts such as communities within a state or region, with similar population sizes, with similar median household incomes, or a combination of these. $1,500
Included
9 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Renewal Agreement.bm.FY2526-144.03.24.2026.docx EXHIBIT “B”

PAYMENT SCHEDULE
Invoice Date Due Date Amount
Upon Contract Execution 30 days following the Invoice Date $12,275 Draft of first survey report 30 days following the Invoice Date $12,275 Start of second survey process 30 days following the Invoice Date $12,275 Draft of second survey report 30 days following the Invoice Date $12,275 Start of third survey process 30 days following the Invoice Date $12,275 Draft of third survey report 30 days following the Invoice Date $12,275 Per Year Subtotal: $24,550.00
Total for 3-Year Term: $73,650

10 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Renewal Agreement.bm.FY2526-144.03.24.2026.docx EXHIBIT "C"
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION
Every employer, except the State, shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways:
(a) By being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this State. (b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations, a certificate of consent to self-insure, either as an individual employer, or as one employer in a group of employers, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self-insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees.

CHECK ONE
I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement. (Labor Code §1861).

I affirm that at all times, in performing the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California. However, at any time, if I employ any person such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California, immediately I shall provide the City with a certificate of consent to self-insure, or a certification of workers’ compensation insurance.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information and representations made in this certificate are true and correct.

POLICY CONFLUENCE, INC.

By: _____________________________ Date: _________________ Alec Vice, Director of Account Management
1 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Professional Services Contract FY22-0160.doc-la

AGREEMENT TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This agreement for the provision of community benchmark and engagement services (“Agreement”) is made and entered in this 6th day of June, 2023 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Policy Confluence, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Consultant”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as a “Party” and, together, as the “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Consultant agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1 – ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT

1.1 City hereby engages Consultant to provide community benchmark and engagement services for City (the “Services”).

ARTICLE 2 – SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

2.1 The Services that Consultant shall perform are more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” titled “Scope of Services,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

ARTICLE 3 – RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY

ARTICLE 4 – PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES

4.1 Consultant shall perform and complete the Services in a prompt and diligent manner in accordance with the description set forth in Exhibit “A,” titled “Products & Services,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

4.2 The term of this Agreement shall be for a period of three (3) years commencing as of the Effective Date unless terminated earlier as provided herein. 2 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Professional Services Contract FY22-0160.doc-la

ARTICLE 5 – PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT

5.1 The total compensation for Consultant’s performance of the Services shall not exceed the amount of [sixty-eight thousand, five-hundred, sixty-six dollars] ($68,566). City shall pay Consultant on a time and materials basis up to the not to exceed amount in accordance with Exhibit “A,” titled (“Products & Services”) which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

5.2 Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City describing the Services performed during the preceding month. Consultant’s invoices shall include a brief description of the Services performed, the dates the Services were performed, the number of hours spent and by whom, and a description of reimbursable expenses related to the Services. City shall pay Consultant no later than thirty (30) days after receipt and approval by City of Consultant’s invoice.

CITY: CONSULTANT:

City Clerk Meghan Ruble
City of Redlands Policy Confluence, Inc., dba Polco
35 Cajon Street 8001 Terrace Ave., Suite 201
P.O. Box 3005 (mailing) Middleton, WI. 53562
Redlands, CA 92373 [email protected]
[email protected] Phone: (858) 295-3872
Phone: (909) 798-7531 Fax: (303) 444-1145
ARTICLE 6 – INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

6.1 The following insurance coverage required by this Agreement shall be maintained by Consultant for the duration of its performance of the Services. Consultant shall not perform any Services unless and until the required insurance listed below is obtained by Consultant. Consultant shall provide City with certificates of insurance and endorsements 3 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Professional Services Contract FY22-0160.doc-la evidencing such insurance prior to commencement of the Services. Insurance policies shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation or modification of the policy except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City.

A. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability insurance in the amount that meets statutory requirements with an insurance carrier acceptable to City, or certification to City that Consultant is self-insured or exempt from the workers’ compensation laws of the State of California. Consultant shall execute and provide City with Exhibit “A,” titled “Workers’ Compensation Insurance Certification,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, prior to performance of the Services.

C. Consultant shall secure and maintain professional liability insurance throughout the term of this Agreement in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim made.

7.2 Consultant agrees it is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:

ARTICLE 8 – GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

8.3 Consultant is for all purposes under this Agreement an independent contractor and shall perform the Services as an independent contractor. Neither City nor any its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or Consultant’s employees, except as herein set forth. Consultant shall supply all necessary tools and instrumentalities required to perform the Services. Assigned personnel employed by Consultant are for its account only, and in no event shall Consultant or personnel retained by it be deemed to have been employed by City or engaged by City for the account of, or on behalf of City. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent, nor shall Consultant have any authority, express or implied, to bind City to any obligation.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of City and Consultant have signed in confirmation of this Agreement.

CITY OF REDLANDS POLICY CONFLUENCE, INC.

By: ___________________________ By: _________________________ Eddie Tejeda, Mayor Meghan Ruble, VP - Customer
Experience
ATTEST:
___________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
7 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Professional Services Contract FY22-0160.doc-la EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
8 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Professional Services Contract FY22-0160.doc-la 9 I:\cmo\Agreements\Polco Professional Services Contract FY22-0160.doc-la EXHIBIT "B"
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION
Every employer, except the State, shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways:
(a) By being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this State. (b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations, a certificate of consent to self-insure, either as an individual employer, or as one employer in a group of employers, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self-insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees.

CHECK ONE
_____I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake selfinsurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement. (Labor Code §1861).
_____I affirm that at all times, in performing the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California. However, at any time, if I employ any person such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California, immediately I shall provide the City with a certificate of consent to self-insure, or a certification of workers’ compensation insurance.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information and representations made in this certificate are true and correct.

VENDOR
By: Date: ___________________
Meghan Ruble, VP – Customer Experience
Optional Add Ons:

Expanded Outreach - 1k Additional Households
Two mailed components per household utilizing either. One initial postcard invitation and one full paper survey packet mailed to every household in the sample or a second postcard invitation. $3,000
Half Page of Custom Questions
We recognize that while you are making this larger effort to get input from your residents you may want to add a few custom items.
$2,200
Full Page of Custom Questions
We recognize that while you are making this larger effort to get input from your residents you may want to add a few custom items.
$4,200
Custom Benchmark Comparisons
In addition to the national benchmarks (included with The NCS Online reporting), Custom Benchmarks can be purchased to compare your results to custom cohorts such as communities within a state or region, with similar population sizes, with similar median household incomes, or a combination of these. $1,500
Remote Presentation of Results
A senior Polco staff member will make one presentation of survey results to staff, Council, Boards, or other appropriate groups. This will be conducted on Zoom or another appropriate technology (that is feasible for both parties and suits the purpose). For this presentation, we use Microsoft® PowerPoint or Google Slides as a visual aid and a copy of the slideshow is shared with your staff for internal use. $2,400
In Person Presentation of Results
A senior Polco staff member will make one presentation of survey results to staff, Council, Boards, or other appropriate groups. This will be conducted on Zoom or another appropriate technology (that is feasible for both parties and suits the purpose). For this presentation, we use Microsoft® PowerPoint or Google Slides as a visual aid and a copy of the slideshow is shared with your staff for internal use. $4,200
Next Steps Workshop(In-Person or Remote)
A senior Polco staff member will make one presentation of survey results to staff, Council, Boards, or other appropriate groups. This will be conducted on Zoom or another appropriate technology (that is feasible for both parties and suits the purpose). For this presentation, we use Microsoft® PowerPoint or Google Slides as a visual aid and a copy of the slideshow is shared with your staff for internal use. $4,500
Open Ended Question
Includes one open-ended question added to the survey. Up to 1,000 responses will be categorized and reported on a separate tab in your online report, accompanied by a complete list of verbatim responses.

We can provide verbatim responses to open ended questions at no additional cost. This cost is for coding responses for further analysis.
$2,400
Additional Language Translation
Survey invitations will include an in-language paragraph, giving instructions on how to complete the survey online in the selected language. The fee is for one additional language. If you have more than three non-English languages, there will be additional charges for outreach. $2,200
Total:

Contact:

Alec Vice, Director of Account Management
[email protected]
608.469.4467
Polco 2026-2029 Engage + Assess(NCS) Proposal | Redlands, CA Scope of Services Options:

Polco Engage + Assess - The National Community Survey®
All Polco Engage features are available to you during your subscription term to engage with your target audiences.

Respondents answer questions via Polco's civic surveying and engagement platform which includes real time results and the option to have respondents verified against voter lists. As participants respond they become part of your community's digital panel available for follow up questions, surveys, polls, and other engagement.

The Assess Module includes 1 benchmark survey per contract period. Your online report will include comparisons to our National Benchmarks, and demographic and geographic comparisons (if response is sufficient by subgroup). Our customer success team will guide your benchmark survey process to ensure smooth implementation.

A representative sample of residents (or other appropriate stakeholders) will be invited to complete the survey to ensure statistically significant response and results. We will use statistically appropriate methodologies to garner community-wide representativeness with approximately a 6% margin of error (4-6% is typical and meets best practices for performance measurement, about 250-450 responses) per local jurisdiction. The invitations will contain an introduction outlining the importance of the survey and instructions for completing it. To supplement this effort, the client will be asked to participate in outreach efforts with guidance on best practices from Polco. Responses will be statistically weighted to ensure the best representation of your community (or stakeholder group, if applicable) ● 3,500 Household Sample Size. 2 Part Outreach - 1 Postcard Invitation & 1 Mailed Survey Packet
$18,750/Year for 3 Years
Optional Add Ons:

Half Page of Custom Questions
We recognize that while you are making this larger effort to get input from your residents you may want to add a few custom items.
$2,200/Year for 3 Years
Spanish Translation of Benchmark Survey
Polco will provide a Spanish translation of your survey and publish it online. Survey invitations will provide a URL and Spanish language instructions for completing the survey online. $1,200/Year for 3 Years
Remote Presentation of Results
A senior Polco staff member will make one presentation of survey results to staff, Council, Boards, or other appropriate groups. This will be conducted on Zoom or another appropriate technology (that is feasible for both parties and suits the purpose). For this presentation, we use Microsoft® PowerPoint or Google Slides as a visual aid and a copy of the slideshow is shared with your staff for internal use. $2,400/Year for 3 Years
One Set of Custom Benchmark Comparisons
In addition to the national benchmarks (included with The NCS Online reporting), Custom Benchmarks can be purchased to compare your results to custom cohorts such as communities within a state or region, with similar population sizes, with similar median household incomes, or a combination of these. $1,500
Included
Per Year Subtotal
$24,550.00
Total: $73,650
Term:

This proposal covers the continuation of the City’s Polco subscription from June 5, 2026 to June 4, 2029.

Date Issued: December 3, 2025
Contact:

Alec Vice, Director of Account Management
[email protected]
608.469.4467

City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I10.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve the agreement between the City of Redlands and Church of Religious Science of Redlands in replacement of Steps 4 Life Community Services for transitional housing services in an amount not to exceed $30,000 (Assistant City Manager Boatman) MOTION:

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move that the City Council approve the agreement between the City of Redlands and Church of Religious Science of Redlands as a replacement for of Steps 4 Life Community Services for transitional housing services in an amount not to exceed $30,000, utilizing previously obligated American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF), under the City’s authorized “Services for Unhoused Persons” ARPA program.

RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the City Council approve the agreement between the City of Redlands and Church of Religious Science in replacement of Steps 4 Life Community Services for transitional housing services in an amount not to exceed $30,000.

DISCUSSION:

On March 11, 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) was signed into law, establishing the Coronavirus State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (SLFRF) program to assist state and local governments in responding to the public health and economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

On March 15, 2022, the City Council authorized the use of ARPA SLFRF funds for several program categories, including Services for Unhoused Persons, which included funding for transitional housing support services through the Steps 4 Life program.

On July 5, 2022, the City Council approved an agreement with Steps 4 Life Community Services to carry out transitional housing support services under this authorized program for the term of July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2026.

The agreement constituted a binding obligation of SLFRF funds and was properly obligated prior to the federal obligation deadline of December 31, 2024. The obligation was documented and reported in the City’s SLFRF quarterly report. Subsequent to the obligation of the agreement, Steps 4 Life Community Services dissolved as an organization and was unable to complete the contracted services. As a result, the agreement was terminated due to the contractor’s inability to perform.

Pursuant to the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Obligation Interim Final Rule, when an SLFRF-funded agreement has been properly obligated by the deadline but is later terminated due to contractor non-performance, the City is authorized to enter into a replacement contract with another qualified provider to carry out the same scope of services using the remaining obligated balance. This replacement contract does not constitute a new obligation of federal funds and is limited to the amount previously obligated under the authorized program.

The City proposes to enter into a replacement agreement with Church of Religious Science of Redlands to continue providing transitional housing support services to individuals experiencing homelessness who are referred by the City’s Homeless Solutions Team. Services under the replacement agreement will include the provision of temporary shelter through hotel and motel placements and supportive case management services to assist clients with housing stabilization and service connections. While the service delivery method may differ from the prior contractor’s model, the replacement agreement maintains the same programmatic purpose and scope of providing temporary housing and supportive services to unhoused individuals as authorized by City Council.

This agreement replaces a previously obligated contract for the same approved program and is limited to the remaining obligated balance. Staff determined that competitive procurement was not practicable in order to maintain continuity of homeless services and ensure timely use of federal funds. Church of Religious Science of Redlands has demonstrated the capacity to provide equivalent services and meets applicable City and federal contracting requirements.

The replacement agreement will be limited to the remaining obligated balance of $30,000, will maintain the same general scope and purpose as the original agreement under the City’s authorized “Services for Unhoused Persons” program, and will not extend beyond December 31, 2026, consistent with federal expenditure deadlines. Finance and Homeless Solutions staff have coordinated to ensure compliance with SLFRF requirements, documentation standards, and reporting obligations.

Approval of this replacement agreement will allow the City to fully utilize previously obligated ARPA funds for their intended purpose of addressing homelessness while remaining in compliance with federal and local requirements.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may elect not to approve the agreement between the City of Redlands and Church of Religious Science in replacement of Steps 4 Life Community Services for transitional housing services.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Not Applicable
SUBMITTED BY:

Christopher Boatman, Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Ashley Rosario, Management Analyst

FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year: 2025-26
Revenue Generating: No
Amount: $30,000
Budgeted Y/N: Y
Account No: 200120-F120002
Additional Appropriation Required: No
Discussion:

Funds are available within previously obligated ARPA SLFRF allocations for the Services for Unhoused Persons program; no additional appropriation is required.

Attachments
Agreement-_Church_of_Religious_Science.pdf
Steps_4_Life_Executed_Agreement.pdf
Steps_4_Life_Termination_Notice.pdf
1 I:\cmo\Agreements\REVISED Replacement Services Agreement w CRS.FY2526-136.bm.docx

AGREEMENT FOR TRANSITIONAL HOUSING SUPPORT SERVICES
This agreement for the provision of transitional housing support services (“Agreement”) is made and entered into as of April 7th, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation ("City") and Church of Religious Science of Redlands, a nonprofit organization (“Contractor”). City and Contractor are sometimes individually referred to herein as a “Party” and, together, as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
WHEREAS, the City previously entered into an agreement with Steps 4 Life Community Services that was funded with American Rescue Plan Act State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“SLFRF”), which agreement was properly obligated by December 31, 2024 and later terminated due to the contractor’s inability to perform; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Obligation Interim Final Rule, the City is authorized to replace the terminated agreement with another contractor to carry out the same scope of services using the remaining obligated SLFRF balance; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the City of Redlands and Church of Religious Science of Redlands, agree as follows:

AGREEMENT
Section 1. Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall end no later than October 31, 2026, unless terminated earlier as provided herein. This Agreement is entered into as a replacement of a previously obligated SLFRF-funded agreement and does not constitute a new obligation of federal funds.

Section 2. Non-Discrimination. Contractor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, creed, color, ethnicity, national origin, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender expression, age, height, weight, physical or mental ability, veteran status, military obligations and or marital status, with respect to Contractor’s performance of its obligations under this Agreement.

Section 3. Contractor’s Services. Contractor shall provide transitional housing support services to individuals experiencing homelessness who are referred by the City of Redlands Homeless Solutions team (the “Services”). The Services provided under this Agreement are intended to replace the services previously provided under the terminated SLFRF-funded agreement with Steps 4 Life Community Services and shall be limited to the same scope and purpose.

A. Contractor shall screen clients prior to placement to ensure the client is appropriate for the Services and to promote the safety and well-being of other clients and service locations.

Contractor reserves the right to reasonably deny or discontinue services for any client, provided such determinations are made in a consistent and non-discriminatory manner and subject to Section 2 of this Agreement.
2 I:\cmo\Agreements\REVISED Replacement Services Agreement w CRS.FY2526-136.bm.docx B. Contractor shall provide temporary shelter beds through the coordination and procurement of rooms at local hotels and/or motels for eligible clients referred by the City. Shelter services shall include, at a minimum, overnight occupancy in a safe and secure location with access to restroom facilities, bathing facilities, heating and cooling as appropriate, and access to food resources or meals, either directly or through referral.

C. Contractor shall provide case management and supportive services to clients receiving shelter, which may include housing navigation, service referrals, benefits coordination, and assistance with housing stabilization, as appropriate to the client’s needs.

D. Contractor shall maintain and retain all service, occupancy, and financial records related to the Services for a period of not less than five (5) years following the expiration or termination of this Agreement, or longer if required by applicable federal or state law, and shall make such records available to the City upon reasonable request.

E. Contractor shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations pertaining to privacy, confidentiality, and security of client information.

Section 4. Compensation and Payment. The total compensation for Contractor’s performance of the Services under this Agreement shall not exceed Thirty Thousand Dollars ($30,000), which represents the remaining balance of previously obligated American Rescue Plan Act State and Local Fiscal Recovery Funds (“SLFRF”) associated with the terminated agreement being replaced. This amount does not constitute a new obligation of federal funds. Contractor shall submit monthly invoices within thirty (30) days after month-end to the City describing the Services performed during the billing period. Invoices shall include a brief description of the Services performed, the individuals served in an anonymized manner as required by applicable privacy laws, and the dates the Services were provided. The City shall pay Contractor within thirty (30) days following receipt and approval of a complete and accurate invoice, subject to compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local requirements.

Section 5. Business License. Contractor shall obtain a City of Redlands business license as a pre-condition of performing the Services.

Section 6. Termination. City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, with or without cause, upon ten (10) days prior written notice to Contractor. City shall have no liability for any claims or damages resulting to Contractor as a result of any exercise by City of its right to terminate this Agreement. City’s termination notice may be issued by the City Manager of City or his authorized designee.

Section 7. Notices. Any notice or other communication required, or which may be given, pursuant to this Agreement, shall be in writing. Any such notice shall be deemed delivered (i) on the date of delivery in person; (ii) five (5) days after deposit in first class registered mail, with return receipt requested; (iii) on the actual delivery date if deposited with an overnight courier; or (iv) on the date sent by facsimile or electronic mail transmission (including PDF), if confirmed with a copy sent contemporaneously by first class, certified, registered or express mail; in each case properly posted and fully prepaid to the appropriate address set forth below, or such other address as a Party may provide notice in accordance with this section:
3 I:\cmo\Agreements\REVISED Replacement Services Agreement w CRS.FY2526-136.bm.docx CITY: CONTRACTOR:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk Edward Torres
City of Redlands Church of Religious Science of Redlands 35 Cajon Street 602 Church St
P.O. Box 3005 (mailing) Redlands, CA, 92374
Redlands, CA 92373 [email protected]
[email protected] Phone: (760) 567-3259
Phone: (909) 798-7531 Fax: (760) 359-0235
Section 8. Indemnity. Contractor shall defend, indemnify and hold City, and its elected officials, officers, employees and agents, harmless from and against any and all actions, damages, losses, causes of action, and liability imposed or claimed relating to the injury or death of any person or damage to any property, including attorneys’ fees and other legal expenses, arising directly or indirectly from any negligent act or omission of, or willful misconduct by, Contractor or its officers, employees, and agents in performing the Services.

Section 9. Entire Agreement/Amendment. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement of the Parties as to the matters contained herein. Any amendment of this Agreement shall be effective only if it is in writing and signed by the Parties.

Section 10. Assignment. This Agreement shall not be assigned without the prior written consent of City. Any assignment, or attempted assignment, without such prior consent, shall be null and void and, at the option of City, result in the immediate termination of this Agreement.

Section 11. Insurance. Contractor shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Agreement all insurance required by this Section and shall submit to City certificates of insurance and appropriate endorsements evidencing that the insurance is in force and effect. Evidence of such insurance shall be provided to City prior to commencing the Services. Acceptance of the certificates by City shall not relieve Contractor of any of the insurance requirements contained herein, nor decrease the liability of Contractor.

B. Comprehensive and general liability insurance with a carrier acceptable to City in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence and Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000) aggregate for public liability, property damage and personal injury. Such insurance shall not be cancelled unless thirty (30) days prior written notice is provided to City.

C. Except for workers’ compensation and employer’s liability insurance, City shall be named as an additional insured on all policies and such insurance shall be primary and non- 4 I:\cmo\Agreements\REVISED Replacement Services Agreement w CRS.FY2526-136.bm.docx contributing to any insurance or self-insurance maintained by City.

Section 12. Attorneys' Fees. In the event any action is commenced to enforce or interpret the terms or conditions of this Agreement the prevailing Party shall, in addition to any costs or other relief, be entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys' fees, including fees for use of in-house counsel by a Party.

CITY OF REDLANDS CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE OF

REDLANDS
By: ___________________________ By: ________________________________ Mario Saucedo, Mayor Edward Torres, President of the Board ATTEST:
___________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
5 I:\cmo\Agreements\REVISED Replacement Services Agreement w CRS.FY2526-136.bm.docx EXHIBIT "A"
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION
Every employer, except the State, shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways:
(a) By being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this State. (b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations, a certificate of consent to self-insure, either as an individual employer, or as one employer in a group of employers, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self-insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees.

CHECK ONE
_____I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement. (Labor Code §1861).
_____I affirm that at all times, in performing the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California. However, at any time, if I employ any person such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California, immediately I shall provide the City with a certificate of consent to self-insure, or a certification of workers’ compensation insurance.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information and representations made in this certificate are true and correct.

CHURCH OF RELIGIOUS SCIENCE OF REDLANDS
By: Date: ___________________
Edward Torres, President of the Board

City of

REDLANDS
300 E State Street, Redlands, CA 92373
Homeless Solutions Division
[email protected]
Date: 10/27/25
To: Cynthia McGuigan, Executive Director
Steps 4 Life Community Services
550 Orange Street
Redlands, CA 92374
[email protected]
Subject: Notice of Termination of Agreement for Transitional Housing Support Services Dear Ms. McGuigan,
Pursuant to Section 6 of the Agreement between the City of Redlands and Steps 4 Life Community Services, executed on July 5, 2022, this letter serves as formal written notice of the City’s intent to terminate the Agreement effective ten (10) calendar days from the date of this notice.

The termination is being issued [select one option below]:
 Without cause, in accordance with the City’s discretion under the Agreement All services rendered through the effective termination date will be honored for payment in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Any outstanding invoices for approved services should be submitted to the City within ten (10) days of the termination date for final processing.

We appreciate your past partnership and the services provided to the community. Please direct any questions to David Rabindranath, Homeless Solutions Manager, (909)761-5196, [email protected].

Sincerely,
David Rabindranath
Homeless Solutions Manager
City of Redlands
cc: City Manager | City Attorney | Purchasing Division | City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I11.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Approve the Professional Services Agreement with Architectural Resources Group, Inc. for preparation of a citywide Historical Reconnaissance Survey and subsequent Intensive-Level Historic Resource Surveys in an amount not to exceed $166,050.00; and determination that approval of the agreement is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State’s guidelines implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (Development Services Assistant City Manager Boatman)
MOTION(S):

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:
“I move that the City Council approve the Professional Services Agreement between the City of Redlands and Architectural Resources Group; and, find that the Agreement is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in accordance with Section 15061(b)(3) of the State's CEQA Guidelines.” RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends that the Council approve the proposed Professional Services Agreement with Architectural Resources Group, Inc., for the preparation of a reconnaissance survey and intensive-level survey.

DISCUSSION:

The Historical Reconnaissance Survey and subsequent Intensive-Level Surveys will be critical tools for implementing the City’s historic preservation program as a Certified Local Government. Completion of these surveys will provide updated documentation to support land use planning, project review, and compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Utilizing a consultant with historic architecture expertise will enable the City to more fully implement its duties as a Certified Local Government and preserve historic properties.

The 2035 General Plan identifies historic and cultural resources as a defining characteristic of the City under Theme 2, “Distinctive City.” Chapter 2 recognizes the importance of identifying, evaluating, and protecting historic resources as part of maintaining neighborhood character and the City’s unique sense of place. Implementation of these General Plan policies is supported by maintaining up-to-date historic resource surveys and documentation.

Policy 2-P.8: “Identify, maintain, protect, and enhance Redlands’ cultural, historic, social, economic, architectural, agricultural, archaeological, and scenic heritage. In so doing, Redlands will preserve its unique character and beauty, foster community pride, conserve the character and architecture of its neighborhoods and commercial and rural areas, enable citizens and visitors to enjoy and learn about local history, and provide a framework for making appropriate physical changes.” Action 2-A.24: “Undertake and maintain a comprehensive citywide inventory and assessment of historic resources. Establish and keep current a list of potential historic resources, historic districts, citrus groves, palm rows, and historic scenic areas. The inventory must identify the values of the resources’ contribution to the city’s historic context. Set up a priority system for designation and proceed with designation.” Action 2-A.52: “Encourage public participation in the process for evaluating and preserving historic and scenic resources.”
The Planning Division released Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 20251112 on November 12, 2025, requesting proposals from qualified firms to conduct a citywide historical reconnaissance survey and subsequent intensivelevel surveys. Proposals were due December 17, 2025, and the City received a total of two proposals. A selection committee comprised of Development Services Department staff convened in January 2026 to review the proposals.

Based on the stated consultant qualifications, experience with similar projects, and demonstrated ability to meet project timelines and budgets, the City has selected the firm Architectural Resources Group to perform the requested services. Architectural Resources Group, Inc., is familiar with the City of Redlands and is the same firm that previously completed the City’s first “Historic Context Statement,” in 2017, as well as the comprehensive “Historic Architectural Design Guidelines” document, in 2024.

Proposed Scope of Work
The proposed scope of work includes coordination with City staff and the Historic & Scenic Preservation Commission to confirm survey areas and inclusion criteria, public outreach to stakeholders and community members, completion of a citywide reconnaissance survey (Phase 1) and preparation of intensive-level surveys for eligible properties (Phase 2), completion of State Historic Resources Inventory forms, evaluation of resources under local, State, and National Register criteria, and preparation of final reports and presentations. The consultant may also be asked to present findings to the Historic & Scenic Preservation Commission and, if requested, the City Council.

Reconnaissance Survey (Phase 1):

Phase 1 consists of background research, community engagement, and a citywide reconnaissance survey of properties constructed prior to 1982. The consultant will review existing planning documents, prior historic surveys, and available records to inform survey methodology. Community outreach will include participation in Historic & Scenic Preservation Commission meetings, coordination with local historical organizations and publishing project information on the City’s website.

The reconnaissance survey will be conducted on a street-by-street basis from the public right-of-way and will exclude already-designated historic districts and individually designated landmarks. Phase 1 will identify properties and potential districts that appear eligible for further evaluation and will result in updated GIS-based maps and survey spreadsheets.

Intensive-Level Surveys (Phase 2):

Phase 2 involves intensive-level documentation of properties identified during Phase 1, as potentially eligible historic resources. This work includes detailed field documentation, property-specific research, evaluation under local, State, and National criteria, and preparation of Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms. The scope assumes documentation of up to 200 individually eligible properties and up to 400 properties within potential historic districts.

At the conclusion of the project, the consultant will prepare a comprehensive Historic Resources Survey Report summarizing the methodology, findings, and recommendations. All survey data will be provided in formats compatible with the City’s GIS system, to support future planning and environmental review efforts.

Proposed Schedule and Cost
The proposed Agreement (Attachment A) provides for the reconnaissance survey (Phase 1) and the intensive-level surveys (Phase 2) to be completed within twenty-four (24) months. The Agreement includes a not-to-exceed amount of $166,050.00 and is structured on a time-and-materials basis. A complete schedule will be refined in coordination with City staff following contract approval.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may wish to not approve the Agreement and provide alternative direction to staff.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

This project is consistent with Priority A (Quality of Life), which includes preserving the City’s architectural character, detailed historic buildings and historic districts.

Strategic Objective 3: Historic Preservation and Small Town Feel Expand historic surveys to include areas that were not previously surveyed and properties with historically eligible buildings built in the 1950s and 1960s.

SUBMITTED BY:

Chris Boatman, Assistant City Manager
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Rosemary Montoya, Planner

FISCAL IMPACT
Fiscal Year: 25-26, 26-27, 27-28
Revenue Generating: No
Amount: $166,050.00
Budgeted Y/N: Yes
Account No.: 101164-6106
Additional Appropriation Required: No
Discussion:

Though this is a carryover and will continue to be for the next budget cycle, the cost associated with the proposed Agreement is already included in the Development Services Department’s authorized budget. No additional appropriation is required.

Attachments
Agreement_w_ARG.pdf
1 I:\cmo\Agreements\Agreement w ARG.FY2526-138.bm.03.20.2026.docx

AGREEMENT TO PERFORM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
This agreement for the provision of historical reconnaissance and intensive-level surveys (“Agreement”) is made and entered in this 7th day of April, 2026 (“Effective Date”), by and between the City of Redlands, a municipal corporation (“City”) and Architectural Resources Group, Inc., a California corporation, (“Consultant” or “ARG”). City and Consultant are sometimes individually referred to herein as a “Party” and, together, as the “Parties.” In consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, City and Consultant agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1 – ENGAGEMENT OF CONSULTANT

1.1 City hereby engages Consultant to provide a citywide historical reconnaissance survey, selected intensive-level historical surveys, and related document preparation services for City (the “Services”).

ARTICLE 2 – SERVICES OF CONSULTANT

2.1 The Services that Consultant shall perform are more particularly described in Exhibit “A,” titled “Scope of Services,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.

ARTICLE 3 – RESPONSIBILITIES OF CITY

3.1 City designates the Development Services Director, as City’s representative with respect to performance of the Services, and such person shall have the authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City’s policies and decisions with respect to performance of the Services.

ARTICLE 4 – PERFORMANCE OF SERVICES

4.1 Consultant shall perform and complete the Services in a prompt and diligent manner.

4.2 Consultant shall complete the Services by March 31, 2028, unless the Services are terminated earlier as provided for herein.

4.3 If Consultant’s Services include deliverable electronic visual presentation materials, such materials shall be delivered in a form, and made available to City, consistent with City 2 I:\cmo\Agreements\Agreement w ARG.FY2526-138.bm.03.20.2026.docx Council-adopted policy for the same. It shall be the obligation of Consultant to obtain a copy of such policy from City staff.

ARTICLE 5 – PAYMENTS TO CONSULTANT

5.1 Compensation: Total Compensation for Consultant’s performance of the Services shall not exceed the amount of One Hundred Sixty-Six Thousand and Fifty dollars ($166,050.00).

City shall pay Consultant on a time and materials basis up to the not to exceed amount in accordance with Exhibit “B,” titled (“Fee Schedule”), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference.

CITY: CONSULTANT:

City Clerk Katie Horak, Principal
City of Redlands Architectural Resources Group, Inc.
35 Cajon Street 360 E. 2nd Street, Suite 225
P.O. Box 3005 (mailing) Los Angeles, CA 90012
Redlands, CA 92373 [email protected]
[email protected] Phone: (626) 583-1401 ext. 101 Phone: (909) 798-7531
ARTICLE 6 – INSURANCE AND INDEMNIFICATION

Consultant shall provide City with certificates of insurance and endorsements evidencing such insurance prior to commencement of the Services. Insurance policies shall include a provision prohibiting cancellation or modification of the policy except upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to City.
3 I:\cmo\Agreements\Agreement w ARG.FY2526-138.bm.03.20.2026.docx A. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability insurance in the amount that meets statutory requirements with an insurance carrier acceptable to City, or certification to City that Consultant is self-insured or exempt from the workers’ compensation laws of the State of California. Consultant shall execute and provide City with Exhibit “C,” titled “Workers’ Compensation Insurance Certification,” which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, prior to performance of the Services.

C. Consultant shall secure and maintain professional liability insurance throughout the term of this Agreement in the amount of One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim made.

ARTICLE 7 – CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

7.1 Consultant covenants and represents that it does not have any investment or interest in any real property that may be the subject of this Agreement or any other source of income, interest in real property or investment that would be affected in any manner or degree by the performance of Consultant’s Services. Consultant further covenants and represents that 4 I:\cmo\Agreements\Agreement w ARG.FY2526-138.bm.03.20.2026.docx in the performance of its duties hereunder, no person having any such interest shall perform any Services under this Agreement.

7.2 Consultant agrees it is not a designated employee within the meaning of the Political Reform Act because Consultant:

ARTICLE 8 – GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS

8.3 Consultant is for all purposes under this Agreement an independent contractor and shall perform the Services as an independent contractor. Neither City nor any its agents shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or Consultant’s employees, except as herein set forth. Consultant shall supply all necessary tools and instrumentalities required to perform the Services. Assigned personnel employed by Consultant are for its account only, 5 I:\cmo\Agreements\Agreement w ARG.FY2526-138.bm.03.20.2026.docx and in no event shall Consultant or personnel retained by it be deemed to have been employed by City or engaged by City for the account of, or on behalf of City. Consultant shall have no authority, express or implied, to act on behalf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an agent, nor shall Consultant have any authority, express or implied, to bind City to any obligation.

8.8 If one or more of the sentences, clauses, paragraphs or sections contained in this Agreement is declared invalid, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder of this Agreement and shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining sentences, clauses, paragraphs or sections contained herein, unless to do so would deprive a Party of a material benefit of its bargain under this Agreement.
6 I:\cmo\Agreements\Agreement w ARG.FY2526-138.bm.03.20.2026.docx IN WITNESS WHEREOF, duly authorized representatives of City and Consultant have signed in confirmation of this Agreement.

CITY OF REDLANDS ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC.

By: __________________________ By: ____________________________ Mario Saucedo, Mayor Katie Horak, Principal
ATTEST:
___________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
7 I:\cmo\Agreements\Agreement w ARG.FY2526-138.bm.03.20.2026.docx EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
8 I:\cmo\Agreements\Agreement w ARG.FY2526-138.bm.03.20.2026.docx EXHIBIT "A"

SCOPE OF SERVICES
9 I:\cmo\Agreements\Agreement w ARG.FY2526-138.bm.03.20.2026.docx EXHIBIT "B"

FEE SCHEDULE
Hourly Rates
Principal-in-Charge $ 275.00
Project Manager $ 200.00
Historical Architect 3 $ 175.00
Historical Architect 2
or GIS Specialist $ 155.00
Historical Architect 1 $ 145.00
Cost Estimate
Phase 1: Reconnaissance Survey 57,370.00
Phase 2: Intensive-Level Survey 108,680.00
Total Not-to-Exceed Fee: $166,050.00
10 I:\cmo\Agreements\Agreement w ARG.FY2526-138.bm.03.20.2026.docx EXHIBIT "C"
WORKERS’ COMPENSATION INSURANCE CERTIFICATION
Every employer, except the State, shall secure the payment of compensation in one or more of the following ways:
(a) By being insured against liability to pay compensation by one or more insurers duly authorized to write compensation insurance in this State. (b) By securing from the Director of Industrial Relations, a certificate of consent to self-insure, either as an individual employer, or as one employer in a group of employers, which may be given upon furnishing proof satisfactory to the Director of Industrial Relations of ability to self-insure and to pay any compensation that may become due to his or her employees.

CHECK ONE
_____I am aware of the provisions of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement. (Labor Code §1861).
_____I affirm that at all times, in performing the work and activities required or permitted under this Agreement, I shall not employ any person in any manner such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California. However, at any time, if I employ any person such that I become subject to the workers’ compensation laws of California, immediately I shall provide the City with a certificate of consent to self-insure, or a certification of workers’ compensation insurance.

I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the information and representations made in this certificate are true and correct.

ARCHITECTURAL RESOURCES GROUP, INC.

By: Date: ___________________
Katie Horak, Principal
City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. I12.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance No. 3001 amending Title 18 (Zoning Regulations) of the Redlands Municipal Code by revising the zoning map (Zone Change No. 482) to change the zoning designation of 8.5 gross acres located on the north side of west Lugonia Avenue, east of Tennessee Street (APN:
0167-171-16-0000, 0167-171-11-0000, and 0167-171-12-0000) to General Commercial (C-3) District (City Clerk Donaldson)
MOTION:

If the City Council determines that staff's recommendation is appropriate, the following motion is provided:

I move to adopt Ordinance No. 3001.

RECOMMENDATION:

It is recommended the City Council adopt Ordinance No. 3001, amending Title 18 (Zoning Regulations) of the Redlands Municipal Code by revising the zoning map (Zone Change No. 482).

DISCUSSION:

The proposed ordinance and the staff report prepared for the introduction of this ordinance are available in the City Clerk's office.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may continue this matter in order to allow additional time to review Ordinance No. 3001.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Not Applicable
SUBMITTED BY:

Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Megan Shea, PT Administrative Assistant

FISCAL IMPACT
Discussion:

Codification: $22 per page affected by the change
Legal Publication: $400

ATTACHMENTS
Ordinance 3001 Zone Change No. 482
Attachments
Ordinance_3001Zone_Changebm02262026.pdf
1 I:\cmo\Ordinances\Ordinance 3001.Zone Change.bm.02.26.2026.doc ORDINANCE NO. 3001

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AMENDING TITLE 18 (ZONING REGULATIONS) OF THE REDLANDS
MUNICIPAL CODE BY REVISING THE ZONING MAP (ZONE CHANGE NO. 482) TO CHANGE THE ZONING DESIGNATION OF 8.5 GROSS ACRES

LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF WEST LUGONIA AVENUE, EAST OF TENNESSEE STREET (APN: 0167-171-16-0000, 0167-171-11-0000, and 0167- 171-12-0000) TO GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-3) DISTRICT.

WHEREAS, Regency Centers (“Applicant”), has filed an application for Zone Change No. 482 to change the zoning designation of approximately 8.5 acres of land (APNs: 0167-171-16- 0000, 0167-171-11-0000, and 0167-171-12-0000) to C-3, General Commercial, as shown on Exhibit “A” attached hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has filed concurrent applications for Amendment No. 55 to Specific Plan No. 40 (East Valley Corridor Specific Plan), Commission Review and Approval No. 976, Conditional Use Permit No. 1207, Conditional Use Permit No. 1208 and Lot Merger No. 13 for a proposed 71,200 square-foot commercial development located on the north side of West Lugonia Avenue, East of Tennessee Street (APNs: 0167-171-16-0000, 0167-171-11-0000, and 0167-171-12- 0000) (the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, on January 13, 2026, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the staff report, oral report, the testimony and the written evidence submitted by staff; and
WHEREAS, on January 13, 2026, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the application materials, the testimony, and the written evidence submitted by the applicant and by members of the public; and
WHEREAS, following the public hearing on January 13, 2026, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed change to the City’s Zone Map for the subject properties would be in conformity with the proposed General Plan land use designation (upon approval of the proposed General Plan Amendment) for the subject properties; and WHEREAS, on January 13, 2026, the Planning Commission recommended to the City Council that the proposed Zone Change be approved; and
WHEREAS, the proposed project is subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared and adopted for the proposed project pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15074; and
WHEREAS, notice of the City Council’s public hearing for the proposed project was published in the Redlands Daily Facts by the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, on March 17, 2026, the City Council held a public hearing and considered the staff written and oral reports, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the testimony and written evidence submitted by and on behalf of the applicant, and testimony by 2 I:\cmo\Ordinances\Ordinance 3001.Zone Change.bm.02.26.2026.doc members of the public; and
WHEREAS, following the public hearing on March 17, 2026, the City Council determined that approval of the proposal is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDLANDS AS FOLLOWS:

Section 1. General Plan Consistency. The proposed Project site is currently designated as Commercial in the City’s 2035 General Plan. The General Plan designates the Commercial land use category for the development of a wide range of commercial uses, including neighborhood-serving stores and convenience centers, regional commercial centers, and commercial recreation. Sites with this designation may be developed with stand-alone commercial use, two or more commercial uses, or mixed uses. The proposal includes approximately 71,400 square feet of commercial space divided between six buildings, which include a grocery store anchor tenant, a drive through building, and four multi-tenant shops buildings on an 8.5-acre site. These uses are consistent with, and will implement what the General Plan’s Commercial designation envisions for this site. The proposed project is consistent with policies, goals or programs which promote the buffers and transitions between low- and high-intensity land uses, siting of high-density projects near regional shopping centers and commercial areas and provides for concentration of commercial uses in appropriate locations near transportation corridors.

Section 2. Approval. The Zone Change of 8.5 gross acres from Special Development (EV/SD) District of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan to General Commercial (C-3) District located on the north side of West Lugonia Avenue, east of Tennessee Street (APNs 0167-171-16- 0000, 0167-171-11-0000, and 0167-171-12-0000), as more particularly shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit “A,” is hereby approved.

Section 3. Effective Date. The Mayor shall sign this ordinance and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this ordinance and shall cause it, or a summary of it, to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation within the City, and thereafter, this ordinance shall take effect in accordance with law.

Mario Saucedo, Mayor
ATTEST:
______________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
3 I:\cmo\Ordinances\Ordinance 3001.Zone Change.bm.02.26.2026.doc I, Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk of the City of Redlands, hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting thereof held on the 7 th day of April, 2026.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:
______________________________
Jeanne Donaldson, City Clerk
4 I:\cmo\Ordinances\Ordinance 3001.Zone Change.bm.02.26.2026.doc EXHIBIT A-1
ZONE CHANGE NO. 482 (EXISTING ZONING)
5 I:\cmo\Ordinances\Ordinance 3001.Zone Change.bm.02.26.2026.doc EXHIBIT A-2
ZONE CHANGE NO. 482 (PROPOSED ZONING)
City Council AGENDA ITEM NO. J1.

DATE: April 7, 2026
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members
SUBJECT: Consideration of a request to approve: Amendment No. 8 to Concept Plan 1 and Planned Development No. 6 for a 983,000-square-foot, multistory medical center expansion project (general hospital and medical offices); certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report (EIR) prepared for the project; and adoption of CEQA Findings, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program. The project site is located at 1301 California Street (APN: 0167-441-07-0000). Proposed Use: Hospital and Medical Offices.

Applicant: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (Development Services Director Reilly) PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC HEARING:

1. Mayor declares the meeting open as a public hearing.

2. Mayor calls upon Department Director for report.

3. Mayor calls for questions/comments from members of the City Council.

4. Mayor calls upon applicant, or his/her representative, for comments and testimony.

5. Mayor calls for comments/questions/testimony from members of the public (3 minutes per speaker)

6. Mayor calls upon City Clerk to note any written comments received.

7. Mayor calls upon the applicant, or representative, for rebuttal comments (5 minutes).

8. Mayor closes the public hearing.

9. City Council considers the motion and votes.

MOTION:

If the City Council determines that the Planning Commission's recommendation is appropriate, the following motions are provided:

I move to adopt Resolution No. 8763 to certify the Final Program Environmental Impact Report and to adopt associated Findings of Fact, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations;
I move to adopt Resolution No. 8764 to approve Amendment No. 8 to Concept Plan No. 1; and, I move to adopt Resolution No. 8765 to approve Planned Development No. 6.

RECOMMENDATION:

On February 24, 2026, the Planning Commission held a noticed public hearing and, following deliberation, unanimously recommended that the City Council certify and adopt the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the project, approve the Amendment to Concept Plan No. 1, and approve Planned Development No. 6. No members of the public spoke at the hearing. Two written comments on the project were submitted: one from the Small Business Administration expressing support for the proposal, and one from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians requesting notification if cultural resources are found during project construction.

BACKGROUND:

The subject property encompasses approximately 36.5 acres located at 1301 California Street within the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan area and is partially developed with a medical office building. The property is onequarter mile north of the Interstate 10 ramps at California Street. The zoning designation for the subject property is Concept Plan No. 1, which was adopted in 1991, and specifically designates the property for a campus-like medical facility. The property is surrounded by existing industrial (warehouse) development on all sides, except for office and retail uses to the southeast including the San Bernardino County Museum.

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The request before the City Council represents the master entitlement for a phased, multi-story expansion of the health care facility in accordance with the Concept Plan No. 1 zoning framework. The proposed actions include:
certification of a Program Environmental Impact Report ("Program EIR") prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"); approval of a text amendment to Concept Plan No. 1 to clarify the entitlement procedures for Development Plan review and approval (consistent with the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan); and approval of a Development Plan (Planned Development No. 6), which would establish a comprehensive site plan and infrastructure program governing the future phased development of the medical center. If approved, the proposal would authorize site development over four phases as summarized below.

Phase Structure(s) Stories Beds Floor area (square
feet)
Existing Medical Office Three — 120,000
I Medical Office Four — 165,000
II Hospital, Central Utility Plant, Parking Structure Seven 213 435,000 III Medical Office Building Four — 83,000
IV Addition of Hospital Wing Five 108 180,000
Total: 321 983,000
To implement the project, the applicant is requesting approval of the following entitlements:

Amendment No. 8 to Concept Plan No. 1: The applicant requests to add the "Development Plan" (also known as Planned Development) application process to Concept Plan No. 1, which would allow the use of the Planned Development permit procedure that is already contained in the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan (EVCSP). In accordance with EVCSP Section EV1.0405(c)(5), the construction of each phase will require a subsequent development permit (e.g., Commission Review & Approval), and each phase must conform to the approved Development Plan/Planned Development entitlement. The proposed Amendment would also ensure consistency of Concept Plan No. 1's implementation process with those of the other adopted Concept Plans (CP No. 2 and CP No. 4), both of which incorporate Development Plan/Planned Development application procedures.

Planned Development No. 6: The Development Plan would serve as the master campus plan for the proposed medical center. Although the applicant has not determined the exact dates of construction, it is expected that the phases would be constructed at roughly ten-year intervals, with Phase 1 construction expected to be completed before 2030. As required by the EVCSP, the submitted development plan includes both a written portion and a mapped portion which: describe the project scope and phasing; provide a design narrative; and detail the location, scale, and intensity of the proposed development.

It should be noted that upon approval of this Development Plan, future individual phases and buildings would be subject to subsequent review and approval by the Planning Commission to ensure consistency with the approved Development Plan and certified EIR. The developer would need to obtain appropriate entitlements prior to issuance of city building permits and/or utility connections.

The hospital will be licensed by the State as an "acute care" facility, and is not planned to contain a trauma center.

Hospital construction will be subject to State permits by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, whereas the other structures would undergo City permitting.

Attachment F includes the Development Plan materials, including both a written portion and a mapped portion that comprise the phased site plan, construction phasing plan, and preliminary landscape plans.

ANALYSIS
The conceptual plans are consistent with the applicable General Plan land use designation as "Commercial/Industrial," as well as the zoning designation as Medical Facility District within Concept Plan No. 1.

For more detailed discussion of the conceptual site plan, site design, and parking requirements per phase, please refer to the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment A) that provides the technical basis for the Commission's recommendation and the Council's consideration. It should be noted that future phases and buildings will undergo detailed review of proposed architectural designs, landscape plans, grading plans, etc., during future development review of each phase.

MEASURE 'U'
The City Council may determine that the proposal is exempt from the Measure 'U' provisions requiring traffic and socio-economic studies. Section 2-B of Measure 'U' states, "Development projects that directly further the primary institutional purposes of churches, hospitals, schools (including private schools and universities), and organizations such as the YMCA and YWCA, on sites held by such entities as of March 1, 1997, are exempt from the traffic level of service requirements and the requirement for a socio-economic study established by this initiative measure so long as such development projects are either 1) non-residential in character, or 2) provide only dormitory, staff housing or senior congregate care facilities for those exempt entities."
The proposed project appears to meet all applicable criteria for this exemption as follows:
a) The proposal is a development project that directly furthers the primary institutional purposes of hospitals (Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Kaiser Permanente);
b) The project site was held by Kaiser Foundation Hospitals as of March 1, 1997; and c) The proposed development project is non-residential in character.

Therefore, the proposed project may qualify for the narrow exemption in the plain language of Measure U, and would not be subject to the standards for traffic level of service or the requirement to prepare a socio-economic cost/benefit study. However, City staff commissioned a traffic engineer to prepare a traffic study to evaluate the impact of the proposed development on traffic levels of service ("LOS") for surrounding intersections in the road network (see Attachment H). The study concludes that the development would not reduce LOS below acceptable thresholds with mitigating improvements, as discussed in the following section.

TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
The proposal involves various public roadway improvements, as recommended by the City-prepared traffic impact analysis and as reflected in the Development Plan. Presently, the project site currently has two full-access driveways on California Street and Lugonia Avenue. Ultimately, three additional two full-access driveways on California Street and Lugonia Avenue. Ultimately, three additional full-access driveways (two on Almond and one on Lugonia) will be constructed. While all driveways will be open to the public, it is expected that the westerly driveways on Almond and Lugonia will primarily serve ambulances and delivery trucks.

The proposed development is consistent with the EVCSP and General Plan road classifications for California Street and Lugonia Avenues as "Major Arterials" with a 126-foot width and a 104-foot width, respectively. Both streets are currently improved to their ultimate right-of-way standard. During Phase 1, the applicant will widen the southern half of Almond Avenue to 32 feet (measured from centerline) and construct new curb and gutter.

As recommended by the traffic study, prior to each phase the applicant will: (1) assess and optimize traffic signal timing at intersections of California Street/Lugonia Avenue, California Street/I-10 westbound ramps, and Mountain View Avenue/Interstate-10 eastbound ramps; and (2) repair and restore all frontage streets up to the centerline, as determined by the project engineer and the City's engineering staff. Specific off-site improvements are presently recommended in the traffic study, and each will be re-assessed and confirmed at the time of development review for future phases of the project. For more detailed discussion of the anticipated traffic improvements, please refer to the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment A).

FINDINGS
According to City Council Resolution No. 5116 (which interprets the entitlement procedures of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan), decisions on multi-stage Development Plans are quasi-judicial and utilize the findings under Chapter 18.192 of the Redlands Municipal Code. All required findings can be made and are provided in the attached Resolution (Attachment M).

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:

A Program EIR was prepared for the project (State Clearinghouse No. 2025010666) in accordance with CEQA. On February 24, 2026, the Planning Commission reviewed the Program EIR and recommended that the City Council certify the EIR and adopt CEQA Findings of Fact, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations.

An EIR is an informational document intended to provide decision-makers, public agencies, and the general public detailed information about the effects which a project is likely to have on the environment, list the ways in which significant effects might be minimized, and discuss potential alternatives to the project. Unlike a Project EIR, a Program EIR is utilized for long-range plans or phased development projects, and is designed to streamline environmental review of subsequent activities that are consistent with the overall program (such as the individual development phases of the current project under consideration).

The Draft Program EIR (Attachment I) concludes that the project has the potential to cause significant effects related to air quality, biological resources, cultural resources, geology and soils, greenhouse gas emissions (GHG), tribal cultural resources, and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). The Program EIR identifies mitigation measures that will reduce the impacts to a level that is Less Than Significant for all topics, except for those related to GHG and VMT.

Specifically, the GHG and VMT impacts are largely attributable to increased vehicle traffic associated with the development, and would remain significant and unavoidable even with implementation of mitigation measures. The Final EIR (Attachment J) includes the public comments received, the Responses to Comments, and the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program. For more detailed discussion of the environmental review process conducted for this project, please refer to the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment A).

Because the project may result in significant and unavoidable environmental impacts, CEQA requires the City to adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations that justifies approval of the project despite those impacts. Four local and regional benefits are identified: expanding access to health care services; enabling the development of a modern, sustainable health care facility; implementing local land use policy objectives; and providing sufficient capacity to meet future demand for health care services. The written CEQA Findings and justification for the proposed project are included in the attached Resolution.

ALTERNATIVES:

The City Council may choose to:

Request more information and continue the public hearing to a future date; Require revisions and recirculation of the EIR;
Add conditions of approval and/or request project modifications; or, Deny certification of the EIR and/or the project applications.

STRATEGIC PLAN:

Not Applicable.

SUBMITTED BY:

Sean Reilly, Development Services Director
RECOMMENDED BY:

Charles M. Duggan Jr., City Manager
REVIEWED BY:

Yvette M. Abich Garcia, City Attorney
Janice McConnell, Assistant City Manager
Christopher Boatman, Assistant City Manager
Danielle Garcia, Management Services/Finance Director
PREPARED BY:

Kevin Beery, Senior Planner
Attachments
A_Planning_Commission_Staff_Report.pdf
B_General_Plan_Land_Use_Map.pdf
C_Location_Map.pdf
D_Zoning_Map.pdf
E_Concept_Plan_One_Land_Use_Plan.pdf
F-1_Planned_Development_No_6_-_Written_Portion.pdf
F-2_Planned_Development_No_6_-_Site_Plan.pdf
F-3_Planned_Development_No_6_-_Construction_Phasing.pdf F-4_Planned_Development_No_6_-_Preliminary_Landscaping.pdf G_Conceptual_Elevations.pdf
H_Traffic_Study.pdf
I_Draft_Program_EIR.pdf
J_Final_Program_EIR.pdf
K-2_CEQA_Findings_SOC_MMRP.pdf
Reolution_No_8763.pdf
Resolution_8764_CP_1_Amendment.pdf
Resolution_8765_PD_6.pdf
City of Redlands

REQUEST FOR PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Planning Commission Agenda Item NO. 5.B.

Meeting Date:02/24/2026
APPLICANT:

KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS
(PROJECT PLANNER: KEVIN BEERY, SENIOR PLANNER)
PUBLIC HEARING to consider and make a recommendation to the City Council on the following matters concerning a proposed multistory medical center expansion project encompassing approximately 36.5 acres at 1301 California Street on the west side of California Street between Lugonia and Almond Avenues:

1. A recommendation to certify an Environmental Impact Report prepared for the proposed project and to adopt related Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act.

2. A recommendation to the City Council to approve Amendment No. 8 to Concept Plan No. 1 — A request for a text amendment to Concept Plan No. 1, subsection 'A' (Discretionary Actions) of section IV, to add an application procedure for review and approval of Development Plan entitlements.

3. A recommendation to the City Council to approve Planned Development No. 6 — A request for a Development Plan entitlement to construct a medical center, including two new medical office buildings (totaling approximately 248,000 square feet), a general hospital with up to 321 beds (totaling approximately 580,000 square feet), a parking structure and a central utility plant, to be constructed in four phases.

BACKGROUND
A) Site History
In the 1960s, the City annexed the subject area and designated it for industrial use (Ordinance Nos. 1227 and 1373). In 1989, the City adopted the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan ("EVCSP") which currently serves as the comprehensive land use plan for the southeastern portion of the San Bernardino Valley adjacent to Interstate 10 and 210 freeways within the City of Redlands, Loma Linda, and an island of unincorporated San Bernardino County (commonly referred to as the "donut hole" area of Redlands).

In 1991, the City Council approved Concept Plan No. 1 for an approximately 306-acre subarea of the EVCSP (including the current project site) bounded by Mountain View Avenue, California Street, San Bernardino Avenue, and Lugonia Avenue. The plan designates the Kaiser property (project site) for medical facility uses; other portions of the area are designated for commercial, industrial, and open space (Attachment C-2, Concept Plan Land Use Plan).

In September 1991, a Development Agreement between the City and Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (Ordinance No. 2171) was adopted concurrently with Concept Plan No. 1 allowing Kaiser to build a medical center with multiple phases on the project site over a 20-year period. At that time, the area was mostly farmland and was lacking the necessary public infrastructure to support a medical center (such as roads, lighting, utilities, and storm drains, etc.). Ultimately, Kaiser never constructed all phases of the prior project and the agreement expired after 20 years (in 2011).

In 2006, the Planning Commission approved Commission Review & Approval No. 827 for an approximately 120,000 square-foot medical office building, 3 stories high, parking lot and related improvements on an 11-acre portion in the southeast corner of the project site (the existing development). The medical office building is currently operational while the rest of the project site remains vacant.

B) East Valley Corridor Specific Plan
Noteworthy is that the EVCSP contains a two-step land use entitlement process, consisting of a "Concept Plan" stage followed by a more detailed "Development Plan" stage. The applicant is requesting to incorporate this existing permitting process into Concept Plan No.1 to accommodate their multi-phase project.

EVCSP Division 1 (General Provisions), Section EV1.0405 (Planned Development Applications), provides for a "Planned Development" entitlement process consisting of: Step 1 for approval of a general Concept Plan to authorize certain land uses within a defined sub-area; and Step 2 for subsequent approval of a Development Plan (i.e., a development permit) for a specific project on an individual property. While a Concept Plan establishes the authorized land uses within a defined area, a Development Plan approves new developments by providing the detailed plans for an actual project (including detailed site plan, infrastructure, access, circulation, landscape, etc.).

When using this two-step process, the decision on a Development Plan (or "Planned Development") is a quasi-judicial act by the City Council. Therefore, the Planned Development entitlement becomes the long-term master site development plan for a property, and has no expiration date.

SYNOPSIS

1. General Plan
Designation: Commercial / Industrial

2. Existing Zoning: Concept Plan No. 1, Medical Facilities district for the subject property

3. Surrounding Zoning:

North: Concept Plan No. 1 (CP 1), Commercial/Industrial district East: Planned Development No. 1 (PD 1)
South: Planned Development No. 3 (PD 3) and No. 7 (PD 7) West: Concept Plan No. 1 (CP 1), Commercial/Industrial district

4. Existing Land Use: One medical office building (Kaiser) with associated parking lot

5. Surrounding Land Use: Warehouse uses on all sides, and office buildings to the southeast; Interstate 10 freeway approximately 1,200 ft. to the south.

6. Area / Topography: Generally flat and surrounding parcels are fully developed and improved.

7. Environmental
Determination:

A Program Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been prepared for the project.

8. Socio-Economic
Cost / Benefit Study:

Proposed project qualifies for exemption from Measure "U" and a Socio-Economic Cost/Benefit Study is not required for the project.

9. Planning Commission
Submittal Dates:
(A) Date Submitted:
(B) Date Accepted As Complete:
(C) Planning Commission Meeting:

September 29, 2022
May 15, 2025
February 10, 2026

SUMMARY
A) Project Location and Setting
The project site comprises one parcel encompassing approximately 36.5 acres on the west side of California Street between Lugonia and Almond Avenues. (Attachment A, Location Map). The site is flat and has been partially developed with a Kaiser medical office building 3 stories high in the southeast portion of the property, while the remainder of the site is vacant and unimproved.

Uses in the vicinity include warehousing, business parks, and other commercial development. The site boundaries match those of the Medical Facilities District contained in Concept Plan 1.

Surrounding land uses and districts are summarized above in the Synopsis.

B) Project Description
The applicant has prepared project development plans to establish a medical center with a total of approximately 983,000 square feet, to be constructed in up to four phases, consisting of the following:

Existing medical office building #1 totaling 120,000 square feet; Ambulatory surgery center/medical office building #2 totaling 160,000 square feet; Hospital with 213 beds totaling 400,000 square feet, related central utility plant building, and parking structure;
Medical office building #3 totaling 83,000 square feet; Future hospital addition with up to 108 beds totaling 180,000 square feet; and Site improvements (including parking lots, landscaping, lighting, walkways, infrastructure, etc.) necessary to support each phase.

To implement the project, the applicant is requesting approval of the following entitlements:

Amendment No. 8 to Concept Plan 1: The applicant requests to add the "Development Plan" (also known as Planned Development) application process to Concept Plan No. 1, which would allow the use of the Planned Development permit procedure that is already contained in the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan. In accordance with EVCSP Section EV1.0405(c)(5), the construction of each phase will require a subsequent development permit (i.e., Commission Review & Approval), and each phase must conform to the approved Development Plan/Planned Development entitlement. The proposed Amendment would also ensure consistency of Concept Plan No. 1's implementation process with those of the other adopted Concept Plans (CP No. 2 and CP No. 4), both of which incorporate Development Plan/Planned Development application procedures.

Planned Development No. 6: The Development Plan would serve as the master campus plan for the proposed medical center. Although the applicant has not determined the exact dates of development phasing, it is expected that the phases would be constructed at roughly ten-year intervals, with Phase 1 construction expected to be completed before 2030. As required by the EVCSP, the submitted development plan includes both a written portion and a mapped portion which: describe the project scope and phasing; provide a design narrative; and, detail the location, scale, and intensity of the proposed development. The following table summarizes each phase of the development.

Table 1 - Project Description, by Phases
Phase
No. Description
I
- Construct an Ambulatory Surgery Center/Medical Office Building ("ASC/MOB 2") - Total of 160,000 sq. ft., four stories high, west of existing Medical Office Bldg ("MOB 1")
- Construct 825 surface parking spaces
II
- Construct a hospital with 213 beds
- Total of 400,000 sq. ft., seven stories high
- Construct a parking structure with 1,288 spaces, up to six stories high - Construct the Central Utility Plant
III
- Construct a Medical Office Building ("MOB 3")
- Total of 83,000 sq. ft., four stories high
- Construct an additional 335 surface parking spaces
IV
- Construct an addition to the hospital, with up to 108 additional beds - Total of approximately 180,000 sq. ft.
- Will utilize the parking structure and parking lots completed in Phases 2 and 3 The hospital will be licensed by the State as an "acute care" facility, and is not planned to contain a trauma center. Hospital construction will be subject to State permits by the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, whereas the other structures would undergo City permitting.

Attachment E includes the Development Plan materials, including both a written portion and a mapped portion that comprise the phased site plan, construction phasing plan, and preliminary grading/landscaping plans.

ANALYSIS
A) General Plan and Zoning
The proposed use is consistent with the site's General Plan land use designation as "Commercial/ Industrial" (see Attachment B), which reserves areas for commercial and light industrial uses, including flex commercial space (retail and services), business parks, auto services, and manufacturing. The proposal is consistent with various goals and policies of the General Plan, particularly those concerning land use in the East Valley Corridor, health care access and economic development.

Specifically, the proposal is consistent with Principles 4-P.27 and 4-P.18, which promote highquality development in the East Valley Corridor to provide opportunities for a range of commercial and office uses and the expansion of the local health care sector, respectively. The project implements policies 7-P.21 and 7-A.61, which call for the establishment of and improved access to medical facilities, and aligns with General Plan Action 4-A.48 which calls for the development of a wide range of commercial uses to serve the region, local industry, and residential neighborhoods, and the employment of local residents. Overall, construction and operation of the proposed facility will be a major employment center.

The proposal is consistent with the allowed uses and development standards under the Concept Plan No. 1 Medical Facilities District (see Attachments C & D) in which hospitals and medical uses are permitted by right. Table 2 summarizes how the proposed development adheres to the standards of the Medical Facilities District, measured at project buildout.

Table 2 — Medical Facilities District Development Standards Development Standard Requirement Proposed Complies?
Lot Size:

Lot Area (min.)
Lot Width (min.)
Lot depth (min.)
20,000 sq. ft.
100 ft.
150 ft.
1,588,709 sq. ft.
1,225 ft.
1,304 ft.

Yes
Yes
Yes
Building:

Height (max.)
Floor-Area Ratio (max.)
Setback (min.)
150 ft.

0.60 25 ft.
122 ft.

0.5971
over 25 ft.

Yes
Yes
Yes
Landscaping:

Landscape site coverage (min.)
Parking lot landscape coverage (min.)

20.0%

7.0%
35%

15.0%
Yes
Yes
Driveways:

Separation from intersections (min.)
Separation between driveways (min.)
75 ft.
100 ft.
over 75 ft.
over 100 ft.

Yes
Yes
1 Excludes central utility plant and parking structure floor area in accordance with Concept Plan code The proposed development supplies off-street parking spaces in excess of the minimum requirement. Table 3 summarizes the proposed parking space count relative to the requirement based on applicable ratios in the development code.

Table 3 — Parking Standards Compliance Summary
Phase Use Requirement Proposed
Additional
Spaces
Required
Total
Required
Total
Provided
Total
Surplus
Existing Medical
offices
1 space per 200 sq. ft.
of gross floor area
120,000
sq. ft. n/a 600 600 0
I Medical
offices
1 space per 200 sq. ft.
of gross floor area
165,000
sq. ft. 825 1,425 1,465 40
II Hospital
1 space per patient
bed, plus
1 space for every
employee and staff
member on largest
shift
213 beds
+ 501
staff
714 2,139 2,470 331
III Medical
offices
1 space per 200 sq. ft.
of gross floor area
83,000
sq. ft. 415 2,554 2,805 251
IV Hospital
addition
1 space per patient
bed, plus
1 space for every
employee and staff
member on largest
shift
108 beds
+ 49 staff 157 2,711 2,805 94
In the first two phases, project construction would involve removal of some surface parking areas, but additional parking facilities would be constructed in advance of the new buildings to ensure sufficient off-street parking supply for the buildings is continuously maintained (Attachment E-3, Construction Phasing Plan).

Based on the loading space requirements under section EV4.0210 of the EVCSP, the development would need to provide at least 10 loading spaces: five for the hospital, three each for MOBs 1 and 2, and two for MOB 3. Required loading spaces must be at least 10 feet wide by 20 feet long, be separate from parking areas, be situated to allow safe maneuvering, and be screened from public view. Five loading spaces would be located on the west side of the hospital at the basement level in a sunken service area enclosed by block walls. Five additional loading spaces would be located between MOBs 2 and 3 to serve both buildings. The existing loading area on the south side of MOB 1 would remain in place.

B) Site Design
The facility has been thoughtfully laid out, taking into account the developed surroundings of the project site. Buildings will be centrally sited and set back from perimeter streets and surrounded by landscaped surface parking areas. Service areas and high-traffic zones, such as the central utility plant, ambulance bays, and freight loading areas, will be positioned on the west side of the site, adjacent to the neighboring distribution facility and oriented away from open space and pedestrian areas. Generous landscaped courtyards between buildings will provide ample open space areas for employees and visitors, while tree-lined buffers along the site perimeter will contribute to a cohesive, campus-like environment. A one-way, U-shaped driveway would be provided on the easterly side of the hospital, which will also function as passenger loading area.

C) Measure 'U'
The project is exempt from the Measure 'U' provisions requiring traffic and socio-economic studies. Section 2-B of Measure 'U' states, "Development projects that directly further the primary institutional purposes of churches, hospitals, schools (including private schools and universities), and organizations such as the YMCA and YWCA, on sites held by such entities as of March 1, 1997, are exempt from the traffic level of service requirements and the requirement for a socio-economic study established by this initiative measure so long as such development projects are either 1) non-residential in character, or 2) provide only dormitory, staff housing or senior congregate care facilities for those exempt entities." The proposed project meets all applicable criteria of this exemption as summarized below:
a) The proposal is a development project that directly furthers the primary institutional purposes of hospitals (Kaiser Foundation Hospitals and Kaiser Permanente); b) The project site was held by Kaiser Foundation Hospitals as of March 1, 1997; and c) The proposed development project is non-residential in character Therefore, the proposed project qualifies for the narrow exemption in Measure "U" and is not subject to its standards for traffic level of service or the requirement to prepare a socio-economic cost/benefit study. However, City staff commissioned a traffic engineer to prepare a traffic study to evaluate the impact of the proposed development on traffic levels of service ("LOS") for surrounding intersections in the road network (see Attachment G). The study concludes that the development would not reduce LOS below acceptable thresholds with mitigating improvements, as discussed in the following section.

D) Traffic, Access, and Circulation
The proposal involves various public roadway improvements, as recommended by the Cityprepared traffic impact analysis and as reflected in the Development Plan. Presently, the project site currently has two full-access driveways on California Street and Lugonia Avenue. Ultimately, three additional full-access driveways (two on Almond and one on Lugonia) will be constructed.

While all driveways will be open to the public, it is expected that the westerly driveways on Almond and Lugonia will primarily serve ambulances and delivery trucks.

The proposed development is consistent with the EVCSP and General Plan road classifications for California Street and Lugonia Avenues as Major Arterials with a 126-foot width and a 104-foot width, respectively. Both streets are currently improved to their ultimate right-of-way standard.

During Phase I, the applicant will widen the southern half of Almond Avenue to 32 feet (measured from centerline) and construct new curb and gutter.

As recommended by the traffic study, prior to each phase the applicant will (1) assess and optimize traffic signal timing at the following intersections: California Street/Lugonia Avenue (morning timing), California Street/I-10 westbound ramps (afternoon timing) and Mountain View Avenue and I-10 eastbound ramps (afternoon timing), and (2) repair and restore all frontage streets up to the centerline, as determined by the project engineer and accepted by City public works.

Below is a summary of the major off-site improvements which the applicant will install in each phase. The applicant will be responsible for funding and constructing the public improvements as outlined in the written portion of the Development Plan (Attachment E-1, "Traffic Improvements" section).

Phase I:

Widen Almond Avenue to provide an additional eastbound lane, and construct a new curb and gutter along its frontage
Construct an easterly driveway on Almond Avenue
Phase II:

Install new traffic signals at the intersection of the existing driveway on California Street, prior to occupancy of the hospital
Construct two new westerly driveways on Lugonia and Almond Avenues.

Phases III and IV: No additional off-site roadway improvements were identified as necessary.

E) Architectural Design
This request for Planned Development approval does not include architectural review at this time (note that the submitted elevations are conceptual and not part of the development plan). The elevations depict a modern curtain-wall architectural design which incorporates metal panels.

Architectural design review would occur through the subsequent Commission Review & Approval process for each phase.

F) Findings for Development Plan Approval
According to City Council Resolution No. 5116, decisions on Development Plans are quasi-judicial and are processed as a Conditional Use Permit. The Planning Commission, in approving an application for a Planned Development, must make the findings listed under chapter 18.192 of the Redlands Municipal Code. The required findings for approval are listed below, each followed by a suggested determination.

1. The proposed development will not adversely affect the applicable land use plans of the city.

The Kaiser Redlands Medical Center will not adversely affect any applicable City land use plan because the project is fully consistent with the land use designations established in those plans.

The applicable land use plans, including the General Plan and Concept Plan No. 1 of the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan, expressly allow and encourage development of the project site for medical uses.

According to the General Plan Land Use Map, the site is designated “Commercial/Industrial,” a category that accommodates a wide range of nonresidential uses. In addition, the Concept Plan No. 1 Land Use District Map specifically identifies the site for medical facilities and, therefore, the proposed medical center directly implements the intended land use for the area. Therefore, the proposed development does not conflict with, and will not adversely affect, any applicable land use plan.

2. The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare.

The Kaiser Redlands Medical Center will not be detrimental to the health, safety and welfare of the public because it has been designed to fully conform to applicable development codes, and is fully compatible with surrounding land uses, which primarily consist of warehousing and commercial development. The project involves the phased construction of frontage and roadway improvements, including the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of California Street with the new project driveway, to ensure the orderly development of the surrounding area. In addition, the proposed use provides direct public benefits by expanding health care services in the region. Lastly, the proposed development does not introduce harmful operating conditions, such as excessive noise or vibration generation, hazardous material processing, or vehicle traffic generation, that would detriment the health, safety or welfare of the public.

3. The proposed development will comply to the maximum extent feasible with the regulations of the city's general plan, the applicable zoning district and the city's development standards.

The Kaiser Redlands Medical Center will comply with the city’s planning regulations because it adheres to the policies of the General Plan, particularly those concerning the East Valley Corridor area, and it fully conforms to the development standards of the Medical Facilities district of Concept Plan No. 1, including lot area, lot dimensions, building height, setbacks, floor area ratio, landscaping, access, parking and loading, and lighting.

4. The proposed development is appropriate at the proposed location.

The Kaiser Redlands Medical Center is appropriate at the proposed location because the site has been planned to accommodate medical uses, including a hospital and medical offices. The site is situated within an existing, long-standing employment area with commercial and industrial uses.

According to Concept Plan No. 1, the site has direct regional access via Interstate 10, and the surrounding roadways have been master planned with adequate right-of-way to handle the expected traffic generated from buildout of the area, including the proposed site development.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
A Program Environmental Impact Report ("Program EIR" or "PEIR") has been prepared for this project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"). An environmental impact report ("EIR") is an informational document which must be considered by public agencies prior to its approval or disapproval of a project, including discretionary and legislative land use approvals. The purpose of an EIR is to provide public agencies and the public in general with detailed information about the effects which a proposed project is likely to have on the environment; to list ways in which the significant effects of such a project might be minimized; and to indicate alternatives to such a project.

The basic steps of EIR preparation include: posting a Notice of Preparation; posting a Notice of Availability; preparing technical studies and an environmental analysis; circulating a Draft EIR for public review and comment; preparing a Final EIR with the responses to comments; and, finally, certification and adoption of the EIR (including the Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations).

A) Background
The Program EIR is a program-levle EIR that examines the potential effects resulting from the buildout of the proposed medical center. The impact assessment evaluates the project as a whole and identifies the broad, area-wide effects which may be caused by the project. Depending on the circumstances, future development proposals may be subject to individual, project-level environmental review.

Topics Analyzed: The Program EIR evaluates the following environmental topics deemed potentially affected by the project.

Aesthetics
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Energy
Geology and Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazard and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology and Water Quality
Noise
Public Services
Transportation
Tribal Cultural Resources
Utilities and Service Systems
Mandatory Findings of Significance
Determining Levels of Significance: The Program EIR utilizes a total of 35 criteria to assess the potential impacts of the project on the environment. The Program EIR states the level of significance of the impact for each criterion. The four impact levels are defined as follows.

Category Definition
"No Impact" The project would not have an effect on the environment. "Less Than
Significant"
Impact
The project would not cause any substantial, adverse changes to the environment. No mitigation measures are necessary.
"Less Than
Significant
with Mitigation
Incorporated"
A substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in the physical environment could occur that might exceed the threshold(s) of significance presented in the EIR; however, the impact can be avoided or reduced to a level that is less than significant through the application of feasible mitigation measure(s).
"Significant and
Unavoidable"
Impact
A substantial or potentially adverse change in the physical environment would occur that exceeds the threshold(s) of significance. Feasible and enforceable mitigation measure(s) that have a proportional nexus to the project's impact(s) are neither available nor would be fully effective in avoiding or reducing the impact to a level less than significant.

The results of the analysis are summarized in the Draft EIR section (Summary of Environmental Impacts) below.

B) Notice of Preparation
The first step of the EIR process is the circulation of a Notice of Preparation ("NOP"). An Initial Study was also prepared to accompany the NOP and to provide a preliminary analysis of the environmental topics to be included in the EIR. The NOP process involves a 30-day public comment period to allow the public and other agencies to provide input on the scope of the environmental analysis. During the comment period, a total of three comments were received from the Native American Heritage Commission, the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the San Bernardino County Public Works Department.

During the NOP process, several environmental topics including Agricultural & Forestry Resources, Mineral Resources, Population & Housing, Recreation & Wildfire were "scoped out" from the Program EIR's analysis because it could be seen with certainty that the project would not have effects concerning those environmental aspects. Therefore, the Program EIR does not further analyze these topics.

Public Scoping Meeting: A public scoping meeting was held on February 12, 2025, at 4:30 p.m. as a virtual meeting on Zoom. There were no attendees; however, immediately following the meeting, staff posted the project description and scoping meeting presentation materials on the city website at https://www.cityofredlands.org/post/environmental-review.

Project Description: To prepare the environmental studies and Draft PEIR, the total building square footage at buildout was assumed to be 983,000 (including the existing medical office building and new central utility plant). The hospital floor area would be 580,000 square feet. The remaining floor area is divided among the medical office buildings.

C) Notice of Availability
The Draft PEIR was completed in the fall of 2025, and the Notice of Availability was circulated for public review on November 17, 2025. The 45-day public review and comment period began on November 18, 2025, and ended January 5, 2026. Printed copies of the Draft PEIR were made available for public viewing at the A.K. Smiley Public Library and the Planning Division office. The Draft PEIR and appendices were also made available on the Planning Division's website at 'https://www.cityofredlands.org/post/environmental-documents' and on the State Clearinghouse website at 'https://ceqanet.lci.ca.gov/2025010666/2'.

D) Draft EIR
Summary of Environmental Impacts: Table 4 summarizes the environmental impacts under each topic area. The Draft PEIR finds that there was "No Impact" to one criterion; "Less than Significant Impacts" to 32 criteria (including those "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated"); and "Significant and Unavoidable Impacts" to two criteria. The following table summarizes the project's environmental impacts. The topics for which it was determined that a Significant and Unavoidable Impact would occur included Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Transportation (with respect to Vehicle Miles Traveled, or VMT).

Table 4 — Summary of Environmental Impacts
Environmental Factor
Number of
Criteria
Evaluated
No
Impact
Less than
Significant
Impact
Significant
and
Unavoidable
Aesthetics 2 -- 2 --
Air Quality 3 -- 3 --
Biological Resources 5 1 4 --
Cultural Resources 3 -- 3 --
Energy 2 -- 2 --
Geology and Soils 5 -- 5 --
Greenhouse Gas Emissions 2 -- 1 1
Hazards and Hazardous
Materials 3 -- 3 --
Hydrology and Water Quality 2 -- 2 --
Noise 2 -- 2 --
Public Services 2 -- 2 --
Transportation (Vehicle Miles
Traveled) 1 -- -- 1
Tribal Cultural Resources 1 -- 1 --
Utilities and Service Systems 2 -- 2 --
TOTALS: 35 1 32 2
Alternatives Analyzed: CEQA requires public agencies to consider and analyze alternatives to projects. According to CEQA Guidelines section 15126.6(d)(2), the range of alternatives "shall include those that could feasibly accomplish most of the basic purposes of the project and could avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant impacts." The discussion must also include an evaluation of the 'No Project Alternative' to allow decision-makers to compare the impacts of approving a project in relation to not approving it.

Chapter 5 of the Draft PEIR compares the environmental impacts among four alternatives as shown in the table below.

Table 5 — Summary of Alternatives
Scenarios Description of Alternative Scenario
No Project /
No Development
Alternative
This alternative would involve the continuation of existing conditions on the site (a single medical office building and remaining vacant land).

No Project /
General Plan
Buildout Alternative
This alternative would involve development of the 28.15-acre vacant portion of the site with approximately 552,000 square feet of commercial and/or industrial uses.

Reduced Intensity
Alternative
This alternative includes the development of a 213-bed hospital (400,000 square feet) in one phase; one 160,000 square-foot ambulatory surgery/ medical office building; a central utilities plant; and parking structure.

Dispersed Facilities
Alternative
This alternative consists of development of about six small facilities totaling approximately 650,000 square feet in the San Bernardino-Redlands region.

Furthermore, the Draft PEIR identified two other alternatives that were considered but rejected as infeasible. The first alternative would be to construct the development on a different project site within the region, but this was deemed infeasible because the applicant neither owns nor controls another site in the region with sufficient space or adequate access. The second alterative would be to provide care to patients remotely at their place of residence. However, this alternative was deemed infeasible due to logistical constraints and worsening the impact of increasing overall vehicle miles traveled.

E) Final EIR
The Final PEIR (Attachment H) comprises the Draft PEIR, comments received on the Draft PEIR, responses to those comments, and minor corrections (errata). The primary purpose of the Final PEIR is to respond to the comments received during the 45-day public review period for the Draft PEIR. As mentioned previously, the review period for the Draft PEIR (State Clearinghouse No. 2025010666) was November 18, 2025, through January 5, 2026. There were no significant revisions to the Draft PEIR as a result of the comments.

Public Comments Received: Two Native American tribes (Agua Caliente and the Gabrieleno Band of Mission Indians - Kizh nation) commented on the Draft PEIR. No other comments from public agencies or individuals were received on the Draft PEIR. Responses to the comments were prepared and included in the Final PEIR.

Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program: A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP"), which summarizes all mitigation measures and outlines the program for monitoring the implementation of each measure, has been prepared and is included in the Final EIR.

F) Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations Sections 15091 and 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines state that when an EIR identifies one or more significant environmental effects, a public agency must not approve a project unless it makes findings regarding each significant effect. These findings can show that significant environmental effects can be avoided or substantially lessened by changes required in the project, or by changes that are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency that can or should be adopted.

Findings can also be made concerning specific economic, legal, social, technological or other considerations that make the mitigation measures or project alternatives infeasible. In addition, findings are required if specific economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of a project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects. In such a situation, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable" and the project may be approved in spite of the adverse environmental effects. The proposed Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations are included in Attachment I-2 (the 'Significant and Unavoidable Impacts' relate to Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Transportation) as part of the draft resolution on recommending Final PEIR certification.

RECOMMENDATION
Based on the above analysis and findings, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution Nos. 1737 and 1738 recommending that the City Council:

Adopt the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and certify the Final Environmental Impact Report including the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program prepared for the Redlands Kaiser Medical Center Project; Adopt Amendment No. 8 to Concept Plan No. 1; and
Approve Planned Development No. 6 to entitle the project.

MOTION
If the Planning Commission concurs with staff's recommendation, the following motions are provided:

1. "I move that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1737 and recommend that the City Council adopt the Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and certify and adopt the Final Environmental Impact Report including the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program prepared for the Kaiser Redlands Medical Center Project"; and,

2. "I move that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 1738 to recommend that the City Council approve Amendment No. 8 to Concept Plan No. 1 and recommend that the City Council approve Planned Development No. 6."
Attachments
Attachment A: Location Map
Attachment B: General Plan Land Use Map
Attachment C: Zoning Map
Attachment D: CP1 Land Use Map
Attachment E-1: Development Plan - Written Description
Attachment E-2: Site Plans (by phase)
Attachment E-3: Construction Phasing Plan
Attachment E-4: Preliminary Grading Plan
Attachment E-5: Preliminary Landscape Plan
Attachment F: Architectural Elevations
Attachment G: Traffic Study
Attachment H-1: Draft Program EIR
Attachment H-2: Final Program EIR
Attachment I-1: Resolution No. 1737 (Recommendation for EIR Certification) Attachment I-2: Exhibit A (CEQA Findings of Fact, Statement of Overriding Considerations) Attachment J: Resolution No. 1738 (Recommendation for Approval) City of Redlands
Almond Ave
Research Dr
M
Hugo St
W San Bernardino Ave
California St
10 10
W Lugonia Ave
Business Center Dr
California St
Almond Ave
evada St
San Bernardino Ave
10 Orange Tree Ln
W Lugonia Ave
Plu

COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL

COMMERCIAL

COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL

AGRICULTURE
LIGHT

INDUSTRIAL
0 412.5 825 1,650 2,475 3,300
US Feet
³
Author: Redlands DSD Date: 2025-11-24
Legend
City Boundary
Parcels
General Plan 2035

DESCRIPTIO
Commercial
Commercial/Industrial
Light Industrial
Public/Institutional
Agriculture
Parks/Golf Courses
Exhibit B: General Plan Land Use Map

PROJECT
SITE

City of Redlands
Almond Ave
Research Dr
M
Hugo St
W San Bernardino Ave
California St
10 10
W Lugonia Ave
Business Center Dr
California St
Almond Ave
evada St
San Bernardino Ave
10 Orange Tree Ln
W Lugonia Ave
Plu
EV/PI
EV/CG
EV/SD
CP-2
PD3
EV/CG
CP-1
SP29
EV/CG
EV/SD
EV/OS
SP25
CP-1
EV/CG
CP-2
PD1
EV/TC
CP-1
EV/PI
SP25
EV/CG
EV/CG
SP25
EV/CG
EV/CG
SP25
SP42
EV/CG
M-2
SP25
EV/CG
PD4
0 412.5 825 1,650 2,475 3,300
US Feet
³
Author: Redlands DSD Date: 2025-11-24
Legend
City Boundary
Parcels
Zoning

CATEGORY
Commercial
Industrial
Public Institutional
Specific Plan
Open Space
Exhibit C: Zoning Map

PROJECT
SITE

Kaiser Permanente
Redlands Medical Center
Development Plan
Owner/Developer:

Kaiser Foundation Hospitals
393 E. Walnut Street, 5th Floor
Pasadena, CA 91188
Property Address:
1301 California Street
Redlands, CA 92374
APN 0167-441-07-0000
April 11, 2025
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
Plan Overview
Kaiser Permanente (“KP”) Redlands Medical Center Development Plan (“The Master Plan” or KPRMC) is a 983,000 square-foot state of the art medical campus located on the northwest corner of California Boulevard and Lugonia Avenue. The site is north of the interstate 10 (I-10) within the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan and the Medical Facilities district of Concept Plan No. 1 .

The Master Plan will be constructed in four (4) phases and ultimately include a 321-bed Hospital, Central Utility Plant (CUP), three (3) Medical Office Buildings (one of which is existing), one (1) Parking Structure and ancillary surface parking. Each phase will be developed as shown in the table below:

Table A
The project objectives are as follows:
• Provide high quality health care in seismically safe, state-of-the-art, and advanced-care medical center facilities for KP members throughout the Inland Empire region. • Supplement and support KP’s existing clinics and medical facilities in San Bernadino County region and provide needed advanced-care medical facilities to the community. • Design a new, 983,000-square-foot, medical center campus in a manner which allows the flexibility to respond to the varied and evolving health care demands of KP members and residents within the region, within the framework of a changing health care industry and KP’s obligation to serve as a responsible steward of its member dues. • Create a comprehensively planned, advanced-care medical center campus that provides community vitality, economic growth, and a wide range of employment opportunities in Redlands and the surrounding region.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
• Provide the long-range development capacity on the project site’s sizeable area which would accommodate the future growth of KP members requiring health care services, while also providing the flexibility for a range of shorter-term interim and conveniently sited, complementary uses.
• Implementing many green building features using the standards of the Green Guide for Healthcare, as such standards evolve over time, and Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Gold certification or equivalent, as well as KP’s existing sustainable building strategies.
• The multi-phased, state-of-the-art mastered planned medical center will include the development of approximately 983,000 square feet of advanced medical services facilities and associated ancillary uses. The medical uses may include, but not limited to, ambulatory care facilities, inpatient and outpatient medical office clinics and buildings, emergency services, urgent care facilities, radiation oncology services, a Central Utility Plant (CUP), and a 321-bed Hospital with surface and structured parking.

EXISTING CONDITIONS
The 36.5 acre project site is located on the northwest corner of California Street and Lugonia Avenue, with Almond Avenue bordering on the north. The site is surrounded by industrial warehouses to the north, south, east and west. To the south is a shuttered water park which will be redeveloped for industrial warehouse use.

Currently, there is a 120,000 square foot medical office building (MOB 1) on the project site that provides primary and specialty care services. It is surrounded by an ancillary parking lot containing 600 parking stalls. At the time of the writing of this Development Plan, construction of a solar canopy along Lugonia Avenue is ongoing. Main access to MOB 1 is provided from California Street with a secondary driveway on Lugonia Avenue. The remainder of the site is generally undeveloped but includes a detention basin that is shared with the western neighbor, located in the northwest corner of the property. There is also a storm drain facility to the north of the building and parking lot that serves the existing MOB 1.

PHASE I
Phase I will consist of a 4-story 160,000 square foot Ambulatory Surgery Center/Medical Office Building (ASC/MOB 2) directly west of the existing MOB 1. The building will contain operating rooms for outpatient (less than 24 hour stay) surgeries and clinical space. The Phase I ASC/MOB 2 will include a surface parking area which will allow for an additional 825 cars and expand and enhance the main entry off of California Street to include a passenger loading area which would take members directly to the front of the new ASC/MOB 2.

After completion of Phase I, the total parking count would be 1,465 which is 40 more stalls than required by the Redlands Municipal Code. The resulting floor-area-ratio (FAR) would be 0.18, and the total landscaped coverage area would be 34% and total Parking Lot landscaped areas would be 14% coverage as noted below.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
A new driveway off Almond Avenue is proposed and will connect to the expanded main entry roadway from California Street. Additionally the driveway off Lugonia Avenue will be widened and improved to allow for two-way ingress and egress.

PHASE II
Phase II would be located to the west and north of the existing MOB 1 and the Phase I ASC/MOB 2.

It includes a maximum 400,000 square foot, 213 bed hospital, which would be seven levels above grade with a basement level and 118 feet tall to the parapet. A mechanical equipment enclosure and elevator shaft will extend 15 feet above the 118 feet, which is consistent with the Redlands Municipal Code section 18.152.03.

An architectural canopy would be located at the drop-off area at the entrance of the Hospital and accessible from the main entry. The Hospital will contain a lower-level Service Yard which will serve as the hub for all waste for the campus. This will be located to the west (rear) of the Hospital tower and service vehicles can access the Service Yard at the Lugonia or Almond Avenue driveways.

After completion of Phase II, the resulting FAR would be 0.43, which excludes the Parking Structure and CUP. The total landscaped coverage area would be 40% and total Parking Lot landscaped coverage areas would be 15% as noted below.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
A 464,000 square foot Parking Structure containing 1,288 (1,218 regular plus 70 handicap accessible) parking stalls located on six levels above-ground plus a basement level. This would be an open-air structure that will be 70 feet as measured to the top of the elevator shaft. The Parking Structure will be detached from the Hospital due to differing seismic criteria and to maintain independence from the purview of the State of California Health Care Access and Information (HCAI) requirements. Supplementing the parking garage is the surface parking area which will contain 865 stalls.

A Central Utility Plant (CUP) will house the energy infrastructure for the hospital campus. This 35,000 square foot building will contain equipment for all campus mechanical, plumbing and electrical needs.

A stormwater bio-infiltration basin, a bioretention basin and underground infiltration basin are designed to be installed with this phase. These facilities are sized for the ultimate four phase buildout. Additionally, two underground fuel tanks, two underground emergency sewage tanks, two underground water tanks and two underground emergency fire water tanks are proposed. The sizing of all tanks will be determined at the time of construction.

PHASE III
Phase III will construct a four-story 83,000 square foot Medical Office Building (MOB 3) south of the Phase I ASC/MOB 2. Surface parking will be increased by 335 stalls on the northeast corner of the property and in front of MOB 3.

After completion of Phase III, the resulting FAR would be 0.48. The total landscaped coverage area would be 36% and total Parking Lot landscaped coverage areas would be 15% as noted below.

PHASE IV
The final phase contemplated for the KPRMC Campus is a 108 bed Hospital expansion to the north of the Hospital Phase II, west of the Parking Structure. The Hospital expansion will match the architectural style and color of the Phase II Hospital building PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
After completion of Phase IV, the resulting FAR would be 0.597. The total landscaped coverage area would be 35% and total Parking Lot landscaped coverage areas would be 15% as noted below.

PARKING:

Parking generated by each phase of development will be satisfied by a combination of surface parking and the Phase II Parking Structure. Upon completion of the full master plan build-out through Phase IV, the total number of parking stalls will be 2,805 stalls which is 94 stalls in excess of what is required pursuant to the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
Parking requirements for the hospital phases is based on a peak staff level of 501 employees for the Phase II Hospital and the 49 employees for the Phase IV Hospital addition.

Redlands Employment Numbers by Phase
Phase Size Peak Staff
Phase I- MOB I (Existing) 91,772 sf 175
Phase 2- ASC/MOB 2 164,800 sf 368
Phase 3- Hospital, CUP, Parking Structure 213 beds 501
Phase 4- MOB 3 83,000 sf 228
Phase 5- Hospital Addition 108 beds 49

VEHICLE ACCESS AND ONSITE CIRCULATION
At the ultimate four-phase build-out, the site will include five (5) points of vehicular access: two (2) on Almond Avenue, one (1) main entry on California Street and two (2) on Lugonia Avenue. A brief description and timing of each access point improvement is provided below:

Phase I – A new driveway on Almond Avenue will be installed with the first phase. The main entry on California will be extended to the new ASC/MOB 1 building and the existing Lugonia Avenue driveway will be widened to allow for two-way traffic. The extended driveway on California Street will be the main entry to the campus and will include a loop with drop off area for members. All driveways will allow for two-way traffic.

Additionally, the southern half of Almond Avenue will be widened to 32’ to the centerline including new curb and gutter. This widening will occur at the eastern half of the KP property that currently projects out into Almond Ave.

Phase II – With the Hospital phase, there will be two added driveways, one on Lugonia Avenue and another on Almond Avenue. Both driveways will be designated for the ambulance route and the Lugonia Avenue driveway will be designated for service vehicles. All driveways will allow for twoway traffic.

Phase III and IV- no new driveways are proposed for these phases.

All other public streets abutting the property are improved to its full future right-of-way standards.

There is a planned bus turnout lane on California Street with the Phase II Hospital in front of the PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
Existing MOB 1. Required sidewalk improvements will be completed for each phase of construction.

TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS
As recommended by the Traffic Impact Analysis Level of Service prepared by Fehr & Peers, KP will install the following traffic improvements:

Kaiser Permanente Redlands Phased Traffic Improvements
Phases Traffic Improvement
Phase 1- Ambulatory Surgery Center
(ASC) /MOB 2 Signal Optimization
Phase 2- Hospital/CUP/Parking Structure Traffic Light at new driveway A at California St Phase 3- MOB 3 Signal Optimization
Phase 4- Hospital Addition Signal Optimization

DESIGN ELEMENT
The proposed buildings will consist primarily of patterned curtain walls with a color palette largely consisting of earthy beiges as well as accented use of white, greens, and blues. Opening treatments will include the use of channel glass, spandrel glazing, clear heat reducing vision glazing, and frit patterned glazing. The unitized aluminum and glass exterior façade of the Hospital culminates with the Rotunda marking the entrance using a curtain wall system with select areas of aluminum and frit patterned glass, and light gauge framed penthouses with metal panels. The building and screen wall include articulation and roof line modulation to reduce massing. All roofmounted equipment will be screened from view as required by EV 4.0240.

The Parking Structure, although detached from the Hospital, is visually connected by way of the architectural metal canopy and the extensive landscaping. The landscaped area provides a welcoming route from the Parking Structure to the Hospital and medical office buildings. The Parking Structure has a glass and metal beacon element located on the north façade facing Almond Avenue, providing a high quality impactful architectural element which speaks the vernacular of the Master Plan Campus.

LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN AND OPEN SPACE
As intended by the Concept Plan 1 Amendment 2, the landscape concept will largely define the visual character and identity of the project site. The primary goal in developing the landscape concept for KPRMC is to create a variety of welcoming respite areas and promenades for visitors, members and staff. At full build out, Pedestrian walks of varying lengths circumambulate the site.

The community can exercise and take advantage of the walking gardens and promenades which will work as an artery that connects the individual buildings. The Landscape Master Plan recognizes and implements landscape requirements of the Concept Plan 1 and the East Valley Corridor Specific Plan.

The focal landscape feature for the Master Plan are two gardens that are proposed around the existing MOB 1 and the ASC/MOB 2. They will include a decorative stream bed, bridge and decomposed granite trails, seating/dining furniture, and decorative paving that will relate these PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
landscaped areas to the built structure. The main entry from California will be enhanced with landscaped medians and decorative paving to welcome visitors and create a sense of entry and place.

As each phase of development occurs, these gardens will evolve and continue to relate the new structures to the existing environment. With the Phase II, the garden north of the Hospital and west of the Parking structure will be enhanced with a decorative dry stream feature. The CUP and Service Yard area will be buffered by varietal trees and plantings, with generous landscaped marking the new Lugonia Avenue driveway.

In Phase III, a MOB 3 entrance will relate to decorative dry stream bed (that is located between the ASC/MOB 2 and MOB 1) and create an enclosed oasis that will act as a central gathering place for users of the three medical office buildings.

In the last phase of development of the Hospital Addition (Phase IV), the garden will be reduced but the seating and dining area will be redefined to include a pedestrian promenade.

In between the development of the phases, portions of the property will remain fallow, but will be routinely maintained and cleared.

Site Perimeter landscaping with a minimum width of 25’ on Almond Avenue, California Street and in excess of 25’ on Lugonia Avenue is designed to soften the parking area hardscape. The minimum setback for this property is 25 feet on all streets and 10 feet to the interior property line, which the project complies. A combination of continuous perimeter berms, ground cover and plantings will screen vehicles while welcoming visitors to the site. City of Redland’s approved street trees planted forty feet (40’) on center is intended to enhance the street scape.

Within the parking lot, landscape fingers every 20 stalls will be installed with a variety of trees per the Concept Plan 1 (Amendment 2). Pedestrian walkways meandering throughout the campus will be highlighted by a “Thrive Path” which will be signed and marked to encourage members and staff to participate in the landscaped amenities.

Water conservations methods will be utilized through all phases of development and in all areas of the campus by way of drought tolerant plantings, provision of water efficiency calculations and best management practices for reducing run-off. The project will use a water efficient subsurface drip irrigation and decomposed granite and decorative gravel with appropriate plant materials to conserve soil moisture. All trees will be watered with bubblers and limited turf areas with high efficiency, matched precipitation rate rotor heads. A smart irrigation controller will gather weather information from rain and weather sensors on site to determine watering times and rates

EXTERIOR SIGNS
All exterior building and wayfinding signage shall be approved via a comprehensive Master Plan Sign Plan approved by the City of Redlands. The campus-wide Master Plan Sign Plan will provide a cohesive and attractive framework to provide guidance on size, location, materials, and colors allowed by the Redlands Sign Regulations. Proposed signs may include wall, blade, pylon, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
monument, vehicular and pedestrian wayfinding, and kiosk signs. Sign features may include LEDs, LCDs, and programmable digital displays. Signs not expressly identified in the City of Redlands Sign Ordinance may be considered by the Development Services Director

CONSTRUCTION PHASING AND TEMPORARY PARKING
It is intended that the site will contain all required construction and temporary parking with no need for off-site parking during all four phases of construction.

Phase I- During Phase I, there will be two phases of temporary and construction parking, Phase IA and IB. Phase 1A is developed first to provide replacement of parking removed during Phase 1B construction.

Phase II- The Parking Structure will be developed first to provide excess parking for MOB 1, ASC/MOB 2 and contractor parking during construction. During construction of Phase 2B, there will be ample parking for all uses. Construction Laydown area is used as necessary for construction activity. The construction of the Parking Structure will provide parking for all future phases.

Phase III- Excess parking from Phase 2 provides for construction parking.

Phase IV- Excess parking from Phase 2 provides for construction parking.

NOISE
KPRMC will be surrounded by industrial warehouse use and general commercial uses. A Noise Study will be prepared by a Noise Analyst to analyze impacts to adjacent properties and sensitive receptors near the project site.

SITE WORK AND STORMWATER FACILITIES
The fully developed site will have a resulting gentle slope from east to west of about 6-7%. Each phase will result the following grading quantities:

Kaiser Permanente Redlands Medical Center Campus Phasing Phase Description
Grading
Quantities
Phase I Phase 1- ASC/MOB 2 Net 0
Phase II
Phase 2- Hospital, CUP, Parking
Structure 26,000 CY Fill
Phase III Phase 3- MOB 3 26,000 CY Fill
Phase IV Phase 4- Hospital Addition 26,000 CY Fill
The existing MOB 1 was designed with on-site stormwater facilities. There is a vegetative swale surrounding the developed portion of the site. There is an existing Detention Basin in the middle of the site and in the northwest corner that straddles the property line and is located on a portion of KP’s site and the adjacent site. It is intended that KP will obtain a quit claim to this shared Detention Basin, prior to the construction of Phase II Hospital. All phases will treat stormwater run-off on-site.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
Phase I will install a bio-infiltration basin on the north portion of the site and a bio-retention basin in between MOB 1 and ASC/MOB 2 and in the center of the drop off drive aisle in the main entry.

Phase II will add a system of bio-retention and underground infiltration facilities that will be sized for the full four phase build out of the campus.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
Appendix
Owner/Developer
Kaiser Permanente
Architect
CO Architects- Tom Chessum
Civil Engineer
Michael Baker International- Scott Davis
CEQA, Noise, Biological Resources, Cultural and Paleontological, Air Quality/Greenhouse Gas and Health Risk Assessment
Ultra Systems
Traffic Engineer
Fehr & Peers
Visual Impacts
Dudek

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
1140
1140
1135
1140
1135
1140
1145
1145
1145
1145
1135
1135
1135
1145
1140
1145
1140
1140
1135
1140
1135
1135
1140
1135
1135
1140
1135
1135
1130
1135
1150
1150
1150
1150
1150
1150
1150
1150
1145
1145
1140
1150
1150
1145
1140
1140
1140
1140
1135
1140
1145
1145
1140
1145
1150
1150
1155
1155
1155
1155
1155
1150
1145
1150
1150
1145
1150
1150
1150
1155
1150
1155
1160
1160
1160
1160
1160
1155
1155
1155
1155
1155
1155
1160
1160
1160
1160
1160
1160
1165
1145
1150
1155
1155
1160
1160
1160
1160
1155
1155
1145
1145
1 1141.36
2 1151.93
5 1148.97
6 1134.59
Pile
Pile
Pile
Pile
Pile
1134.4
1135.7
1136.6 1137.3 1138.6
1139.6 1140.4 1141.7 1142.5 1143.6
1144.7
1145.4
1146.5
1147.6
1148.4
1149.6
1150.6 1151.5
1152.5
1153.5
1154.6 1155.6 1156.5
1157.5
1158.6
1159.7 1160.6
1162.3
1162.3
1161.3
1160.4
1160.4
1159.8
1159.4
1158.6
1157.9
1158.4
1159.3
1158.6
1158.7
1160.6
1161.7
1162.5
1158.3 1159.7
1156.6
1157.5
1155.6
1154.4
1152.5
1153.7
1151.5 1150.7
1149.6 1148.6
1147.5
1146.5
1145.6 1144.5
1143.5
1142.5
1161.1
1139.5
1141.3
1135.3
1133.7
1134.7
1140.7
1142.6
1138.5
1136.3
1136.2
1136.1
1136.2
1136.7
1136.7
1136.5
1136.6
1136.4
1135.5
1136.9
1143.4
1143.5
1137.9
1136.7
1136.9
1136.8
1136.7
1142.6
1136.5
1134.2
1133.2
1132.5
1132.7
1142.5
1139.9
1138.7
1138.7
1138.6
1138.4
1143.4
1136.9
1133.5
1132.9
1133.1
1132.5
1139.3
1137.2
1145.4
1145.7
1145.6
1145.6
1145.6
1145.4
1144.3
1143.4
1133.5
1133.2
1132.8
1132.4
1141.8
1137.8
1146.7
1146.3
1146.3
1146.3
1146.2
1145.7
1144.7
1144.5
1142.3
1133.4
1133.3
1133.1
1142.5
1147.6
1147.2
1147.2
1147.5
1147.3
1146.5
1145.9
1145.7
1145.2
1139.7
1134.4
1134.3
1143.7
1146.3
1148.5
1147.6
1148.2
1148.3
1147.8
1147.3
1146.5
1146.3
1148.3
1147.3
1146.4
1145.5
1148.4
1148.9
1148.7
1148.7
1148.9
1148.6
1147.5
1147.4
1147.2
1148.4
1150.2
1150.3
1150.8
1150.2
1150.5
1149.8
1150.2
1150.3
1150.4
1149.8
1149.4
1149.4
1148.7
1149.4
1151.8
1152.5
1152.4
1151.5
1149.7
1155.3
1149.7
1150.5
1150.7
1150.5
1150.3
1150.1
1149.4
1149.7
1149.7
1152.5
1153.4
1153.7
1153.5
1152.7
1154.3
1155.6
1155.2
1153.2
1151.7
1151.8
1151.2
1153.7
1154.5
1154.7
1154.4
1150.3
1156.7
1149.1
1153.8
1155.4
1155.6
1152.3
1150.9
1154.1
1156.3
1156.2
1155.9
1149.9
1153.6
1155.2
1155.6
1152.4
1154.6
1156.9
1156.7
1155.9
1151.5
1158.3
1155.1
1154.5
1155.5
1156.5
1156.5
1157.2
1155.9
1153.7
1155.5
1157.5
1152.3
1159.7
1151.6
1154.2
1154.3
1154.6
1154.7
1154.5
1154.5
1155.7
1157.5
1158.5
1158.4
1158.2
1161.2
1157.2
1153.5
1152.5
1152.8
1152.7
1153.4
1158.3
1157.7
1159.4
1159.7
1159.4
1159.2
1154.7
1161.3
1159.7
1158.8
1158.8
1159.1
1158.8
1158.3
1158.5
1159.2
1159.7
1159.6
1160.9
1161.5
1162.2
1160.5
1158.4
1158.9
1160.6
1159.2
1159.2
1159.3
1160.5
1160.4
1160.3
1161.3
1161.7
1163.1
1161.6
1160.8
1163.9
1164.1
1155.5
1155.5
1137.4
1137.5
1141.9
1135.4
1135.5
1134.5
1133.5
1133.3
1132.7
1131.5
1132.9
1132.5
1132.9
1133.4
1144.4
1145.5
1147.8
1148.2
1149.5
1154.9
1152.6
1154.4
1155.5
1151.5
1150.8
1155.5
1155.5
1155.1
1153.4
1153.2
1153.5
1152.7
1152.9
1153.5
1153.5
1153.2
1152.6
1152.3
1152.1
1136.8
1132.3 1133.6
1134.7
1142.5
1143.7
1137.7
1144.9
1139.2
1144.6
1153.5
1157.3
1157.3
1158.3
1156.4
1155.5
1155.5
1153.3
1152.5
1154.2
1156.5
1157.5
1157.4
1153.4 1152.2
1155.8
1158.6
1158.4
1152.8
1153.5
1156.5
1155.5
1151.5
1140.4
1156.3
1158.9
1157.3
1157.9
1159.5
1150.5
1148.7
1146.6
1154.8
1155.7
1158.6
1163.7
1164.7
1163.4
1163.6
1161.4
1159.4
1158.6
1159.7
1160.5
1162.3
1138.4
1135.5
1145.2
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured Ground Obscured Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
FH
MH
MH
s
s
V

P P P P P P P
V FH
V
MH
V V

V V V V V
s
V
V
s
V
V
FH
V
s
V
s
V
P
P
V
s
V
V
FH
s
V
V
s s
FH
V
V
V
V
V
V
MH
V V

P P P P
s
s
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
MH
s
s
FH
s
V
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
s
FH
V
V
s
s
s
s
V
s
s
s
V
MH
s
s
s
s
V
V
V
P
P
s
s
P
MH
s
s
P
P
P
P
P
s
V
s
V
P
V
FH
P
s
s
s
s
MH
FH
s
s
s
s
V
FH
MH
s
MH
FH
s
MH
MH
MH
P
s
P
s
MH
MH
V
MH
MH
MH
MH MH
V
MH
MH
s
MH
MH
s
ss
V
FH FH
FH FH
V V
V
P
P
FH
V
s
s
FH FH
MH
FH
s
MH
MH
FH
s
MH
s s
V
MH
MH
V
V
FH
FH
MH
s
s
MH
FH
MH
FH
MH
FH
V
FH
s
s
MH
MH
P
P
FH
s
s
s
P
P
V
FH
P
s
MH
MH
MH
FH
P
P
V
V
FH
MH
FH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
FH
FH
V
MH
MH
V
FH
s
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
s
FH
MH
MH
s
MH
FH
s
MH
FH
s
FH
MH
FH
s
P
MH
V
V
s
FH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH MH
V
V
MH
MH
V
V
V
V
s
MH
FH
FH
V
s
s
s
s
s
s
FH
PPPP P
PPPP
MH
1140
1140
1135
1140
1135
1140
1145
1145
1145
1145
1135
1135
1135
1145
1140
1145
1140
1140
1135
1140
1135
1135
1140
1135
1135
1140
1135
1135
1130
1135
1150
1150
1150
1150
1150
1150
1150
1150
1145
1145
1140
1150
1150
1145
1140
1140
1140
1140
1135
1140
1145
1145
1140
1145
1150
1150
1155
1155
1155
1155
1155
1150
1145
1150
1150
1145
1150
1150
1150
1155
1150
1155
1160
1160
1160
1160
1160
1155
1155
1155
1155
1155
1155
1160
1160
1160
1160
1160
1160
1165
1145
1150
1155
1155
1160
1160
1160
1160
1155
1155
1145
1145
1 1141.36
2 1151.93
5 1148.97
6 1134.59
Pile
Pile
Pile
Pile
Pile
1134.4
1135.7
1136.6 1137.3 1138.6
1139.6 1140.4 1141.7 1142.5 1143.6
1144.7
1145.4
1146.5
1147.6
1148.4
1149.6
1150.6 1151.5
1152.5
1153.5
1154.6 1155.6 1156.5
1157.5
1158.6
1159.7 1160.6
1162.3
1162.3
1161.3
1160.4
1160.4
1159.8
1159.4
1158.6
1157.9
1158.4
1159.3
1158.6
1158.7
1160.6
1161.7
1162.5
1158.3 1159.7
1156.6
1157.5
1155.6
1154.4
1152.5
1153.7
1151.5 1150.7
1149.6 1148.6
1147.5
1146.5
1145.6 1144.5
1143.5
1142.5
1161.1
1139.5
1141.3
1135.3
1133.7
1134.7
1140.7
1142.6
1138.5
1136.3
1136.2
1136.1
1136.2
1136.7
1136.7
1136.5
1136.6
1136.4
1135.5
1136.9
1143.4
1143.5
1137.9
1136.7
1136.9
1136.8
1136.7
1142.6
1136.5
1134.2
1133.2
1132.5
1132.7
1142.5
1139.9
1138.7
1138.7
1138.6
1138.4
1143.4
1136.9
1133.5
1132.9
1133.1
1132.5
1139.3
1137.2
1145.4
1145.7
1145.6
1145.6
1145.6
1145.4
1144.3
1143.4
1133.5
1133.2
1132.8
1132.4
1141.8
1137.8
1146.7
1146.3
1146.3
1146.3
1146.2
1145.7
1144.7
1144.5
1142.3
1133.4
1133.3
1133.1
1142.5
1147.6
1147.2
1147.2
1147.5
1147.3
1146.5
1145.9
1145.7
1145.2
1139.7
1134.4
1134.3
1143.7
1146.3
1148.5
1147.6
1148.2
1148.3
1147.8
1147.3
1146.5
1146.3
1148.3
1147.3
1146.4
1145.5
1148.4
1148.9
1148.7
1148.7
1148.9
1148.6
1147.5
1147.4
1147.2
1148.4
1150.2
1150.3
1150.8
1150.2
1150.5
1149.8
1150.2
1150.3
1150.4
1149.8
1149.4
1149.4
1148.7
1149.4
1151.8
1152.5
1152.4
1151.5
1149.7
1155.3
1149.7
1150.5
1150.7
1150.5
1150.3
1150.1
1149.4
1149.7
1149.7
1152.5
1153.4
1153.7
1153.5
1152.7
1154.3
1155.6
1155.2
1153.2
1151.7
1151.8
1151.2
1153.7
1154.5
1154.7
1154.4
1150.3
1156.7
1149.1
1153.8
1155.4
1155.6
1152.3
1150.9
1154.1
1156.3
1156.2
1155.9
1149.9
1153.6
1155.2
1155.6
1152.4
1154.6
1156.9
1156.7
1155.9
1151.5
1158.3
1155.1
1154.5
1155.5
1156.5
1156.5
1157.2
1155.9
1153.7
1155.5
1157.5
1152.3
1159.7
1151.6
1154.2
1154.3
1154.6
1154.7
1154.5
1154.5
1155.7
1157.5
1158.5
1158.4
1158.2
1161.2
1157.2
1153.5
1152.5
1152.8
1152.7
1153.4
1158.3
1157.7
1159.4
1159.7
1159.4
1159.2
1154.7
1161.3
1159.7
1158.8
1158.8
1159.1
1158.8
1158.3
1158.5
1159.2
1159.7
1159.6
1160.9
1161.5
1162.2
1160.5
1158.4
1158.9
1160.6
1159.2
1159.2
1159.3
1160.5
1160.4
1160.3
1161.3
1161.7
1163.1
1161.6
1160.8
1163.9
1164.1
1155.5
1155.5
1137.4
1137.5
1141.9
1135.4
1135.5
1134.5
1133.5
1133.3
1132.7
1131.5
1132.9
1132.5
1132.9
1133.4
1144.4
1145.5
1147.8
1148.2
1149.5
1154.9
1152.6
1154.4
1155.5
1151.5
1150.8
1155.5
1155.5
1155.1
1153.4
1153.2
1153.5
1152.7
1152.9
1153.5
1153.5
1153.2
1152.6
1152.3
1152.1
1136.8
1132.3 1133.6
1134.7
1142.5
1143.7
1137.7
1144.9
1139.2
1144.6
1153.5
1157.3
1157.3
1158.3
1156.4
1155.5
1155.5
1153.3
1152.5
1154.2
1156.5
1157.5
1157.4
1153.4 1152.2
1155.8
1158.6
1158.4
1152.8
1153.5
1156.5
1155.5
1151.5
1140.4
1156.3
1158.9
1157.3
1157.9
1159.5
1150.5
1148.7
1146.6
1154.8
1155.7
1158.6
1163.7
1164.7
1163.4
1163.6
1161.4
1159.4
1158.6
1159.7
1160.5
1162.3
1138.4
1135.5
1145.2
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured Ground Obscured Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
Ground Obscured
FH
MH
MH
s
s
V

P P P P P P P
V FH
V
MH
V V

V V V V V
s
V
V
s
V
V
FH
V
s
V
s
V
P
P
V
s
V
V
FH
s
V
V
s s
FH
V
V
V
V
V
V
MH
V V

FS/ SNF
50002
1143. 79

FS/ SNF
50001
1143. 04

FS/ SNF
50002
1143. 79

FS/ SNF

EXISTING
MOB 1

LUGONIA AVENUE

ALMOND AVENUE

CALIFORNIA STREET
3-STORY
1303'
12 2
6'
1304'
12 2
5'
ROW
63'
ROW
77'
ROW
65'
4 4'
4 4'
63'
5 2'
01 03
04 04
04 01 02
02 02
01 01
01 05
06 06
07 09
10 12 11
08 07
07 07
Site Development Plan Number:

OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: 626.405.6333
Sheet:

JANUARY 31, 2025
ADDRESS: 393 E. Walnut Street, 4th Floor, Pasadena, CA 91188 ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, DESIGNER: CO Architects, Michael Baker Intl., Ridge Landscape Architects PHONE: 323.525.0500 (Architect) ADDRESS: 5750 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 550, Los Angeles CA 90036 (Architect) TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: XXXXX
LOCATION: 1301 California Street, Redlands, CA 92374
ZONE: CR ZONE ACCESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 0167-441-07

REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER

CITY OF REDLANDS
1" = 80'-0"
EXISTING SITE PLAN A 1.10
2 1" = 80'-0"

EXISTING SITE - OVERALL
EXISTING MOB 1 MATERIAL NOTES:
01 PAINTED PLASTER (45'-0")
02 PAINTED PLASTER (47'-0")
03 SCREEN WALL WITH METAL SIDING (7'-0")
04 SLATE TILE WALL SYSTEM (12'-5.5")
05 STOREFRONT / CURTAINWALL SYSTEM (44'-4")
06 METAL PANEL (54'-0")
CONCRETE BOLLARDS (24")
07 FREESTANDING COURT WALL (12'-6")
08 CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE SEATWALL (18")
09 CMU BLOCK WALL (10'-0")
10 11
12 IRON GATE (8'-0")
METAL PANEL (8'-0")
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
MH
MH
MH
V V

V V V V V
s
V
MH
V V

P P P P
s
s
P
P
P
P
P
P
V
MH
s
s
MH
s
s
P
P
P
P
P
s
V
s
V
FH
MH
FH
s
s
s
s
V
FH
MH
s
MH
FH
s
MH
MH
MH
P
s
P
s
MH
MH
V
MH
MH
MH MH
V
MH
MH
MH
s
ss
V
FH FH
FH FH
V V
V
P
P
FH
V
s
s
FH FH
MH
FH
s
MH
MH
FH
s
MH
s s
V
MH
MH
V
V
FH
FH
MH
s
s
MH
FH
MH
FH
MH
FH
V
FH
s
s
MH
MH
P
P
FH
s
s
s
P
P
V
MH
V
V
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
FH
V
MH
MH
V
FH
s
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH
s
FH
MH
MH
s
MH
FH
s
MH
FH
s
FH
MH
FH
s
P
MH
V
V
s
FH
MH
MH
MH
MH
MH MH
V
V
MH
MH
V
s
MH
V
s
s
s
s
s
FH
PPPP P
PPPP
1 1141.36
2 1151.93
5 1148.97
6 1134.59
50001
1143. 04

FS/ SNF
50002
1143. 79

FS/ SNF
50001
1143. 04

FS/ SNF
50002
1143. 79

FS/ SNF
44' 44'
52' 52'
44'
1'

21.75'
63'
65'
63'
77'
17'
74 0. 6' ROW
ROW
ROW
( )
C.O.C.
35'
233.23'
44' 44'
52' 52'
35'

41.25'
44'
17'
14'
6'
22'
1'

21.75'
63'

23.75'
65'
63'
77'

35.75'
17'
6'
5'
3'
3'
( )
C.O.C.
35'
233.23'
44' 44'
52' 52'
35'

41.25'
44'
17'
14'
6'
22'
1'

21.75'
63'

23.75'
65'
63'
77'

35.75'
17'
6'
5'
3'
3'

LUGONIA AVENUE

ALMOND AVENUE

CALIFORNIA STREET
26 STD + 28 HC
72 HC
490' - 0" 280' - 4" 13 STD + 9 HC
124' 157'
66' 200' 116' 90'
256' - 11"
171' - 5"
69' - 6"

PARKING SETBACK
30'
30'
2 5'
2 5'

LANDSCAPE

STREET FRONTAGE
25'
62' - 2"

PASSENGER LOADING
85' - 4"
67 STD
64 STD
64 STD
64 STD
64 STD
64 STD
64 STD
64 STD
64 STD
67 STD
67 STD
32 HC
52 STD
52 STD
58 STD
47 STD
50 STD
49 STD
14 STD 32 STD + 2 HC
39 STD
15 STD + 2 HC 13 STD + 9 HC
28 STD + 2 HC
32 STD
10 STD20 STD28 STD
18 STD
ASC / MOB 2
4-STORY

EXISTING
MOB 1
3-STORY
6' - 0"
64' - 0"
6' - 0" 64' - 0"
9' - 0" 126' - 0" 9' - 0" 72' - 0"
9' - 0" 144' - 0" 44' - 2"
66'
6' - 0"
64' - 0"
6' - 0" 64' - 0"
639' - 6"
349' - 8" 9' - 0" 171' - 0" 9' - 0" 117' - 2" 11' - 5"

PASSENGER DROP-OFF
30'
2 5'
35'
26' 5'
206' 374'
4 6'

VEHICLE ACCESS

AMBULANCE ROUTE

CIRCULATION LEGEND

PHASING LEGEND

PEDESTRIAN PATH

SERVICE ROUTE

COMPLETE/PROPOSED

EXISTING

SITE PLAN LEGEND

DEVELOPED SITE AREA

LANDSCAPED AREA

SURFACE PARKING

PERIMETER WALL
Site Development Plan Number:

OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: 626.405.6333
Sheet:

REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER

CITY OF REDLANDS
As indicated
PHASE 1 SITE PLAN A 1.11
1 1" = 80'-0"
SITE - PHASE 1
1,425 1,465 156 156
Excess 40 13 13
ASC/MOB 2 5 per 1,000 sf 165,000... 825 825 10% 83 83
Existing MOB 1 5 per 1,000 sf 120,000 SF 600 600 10% 60 60 BUILDING: REQUIREMENT: DEMAND: REQ: PROV: ADA %: ADA #: ADA PROV:

PARKING DESCRIPTION: PARKING TOTAL PROVIDED: ADA PORTION OF TOTAL:

Total Parking Area Landscape 85,000 SF 14%
Total Surface Parking Area 601,000 SF
Total Landscaped Area 411,000 SF 34%
Total Building Coverage 76,000 SF
Total Developed Site Area 1,194,000 SF
SITE COVERAGE: AREA: % COVERAGE
Total Building Area 285,000 SF
ASC/MOB 2 165,000 SF
Existing MOB 1 120,000 SF
BUILDING DESCRIPTION: AREA:

PHASE 1
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
MH
MH
MH
V V

V V V V V
s
V
MH
V V

FS/ SNF
50002
1143. 79

FS/ SNF
50001
1143. 04

FS/ SNF
50002
1143. 79

FS/ SNF
44' 44'
52' 52'
44'
1'

21.75'
63'
65'
63'
77'
17'
74 0. 6' ROW
ROW
ROW

LUGONIA AVENUE

ALMOND AVENUE

CALIFORNIA STREET

PARKING STRUCTURE
CUP
ASC / MOB 2

HOSPITAL
7-STORY
3-STORY
4-STORY
2-STORY
46 HC
57 STD + 15 HC
1,218 STD + 70 HC
6-LEVEL + BASEMENT
13 STD + 9 HC

PARKING SETBACK
30'
30'
2 5'
2 5'

LANDSCAPE

STREET FRONTAGE
25'
62' - 2"

PASSENGER LOADING
85' - 4"

EXISTING
MOB 1
3-STORY
17 STD
20 STD
20 STD
111 STD
81 STD
47 STD
50 STD
49 STD
14 STD 32 STD + 2 HC
39 STD
15 STD + 2 HC 13 STD + 9 HC
28 STD + 2 HC
32 STD
10 STD20 STD28 STD
18 STD
21 STD
29 STD
18 STD
9 STD + 13 HC
35 STD
40 STD
40 STD
18 HC
50 STD 37 STD 73 STD
380' - 0"
89' 90' 482' - 7"
128' - 8" 480' - 6"
01 PASSENGER DROP-OFF
2 5'

AIR-SOURCE

EQUIPMENT
YARD
118'
2 5'
2 5'
171' 9' 162' 9' 162' 9' 99' 9' 135' 9' 135' 9' 135'
5'
174' 200'
26'
170' 196'
23'

VEHICLE ACCESS

AMBULANCE ROUTE

CIRCULATION LEGEND

PHASING LEGEND

PEDESTRIAN PATH

SERVICE ROUTE

COMPLETE/PROPOSED

EXISTING

SITE PLAN LEGEND

DEVELOPED SITE AREA

LANDSCAPED AREA

SURFACE PARKING

PERIMETER WALL
Site Development Plan Number:

OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: 626.405.6333
Sheet:

REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER

CITY OF REDLANDS
As indicated
PHASE 2 SITE PLAN A 1.12
1 1" = 80'-0"
SITE - PHASE 2
MATERIAL NOTES:
01 CMU (6'-0")
2,139 2,470 186 186
Excess 331 27 27
Central Utility Plant NA NA 0 0 NA 0 0
1 per peak Staff 501 Staff 501 501 2% 11 11
Hospital - 213 Beds 1 per Bed 213 Beds 213 213 2% 5 5
ASC/MOB 2 5 per 1,000 sf 165,000... 825 825 10% 83 83
Existing MOB 1 5 per 1,000 sf 120,000 SF 600 600 10% 60 60 BUILDING: REQUIREMENT: DEMAND: REQ: PROV: ADA %: ADA #: ADA PROV:

PARKING DESCRIPTION: PARKING TOTAL PROVIDED: ADA PORTION OF TOTAL:

Total Parking Area Landscape 85,000 SF 15%
Total Surface Parking Area 557,000 SF
Total Landscaped Area 602,000 SF 40%
Total Building Coverage 213,000 SF
Total Developed Site Area 1,513,000 SF
SITE COVERAGE: AREA: % COVERAGE
Total Building Area 720,000 SF
Central Utility Plant 35,000 SF
Hospital 400,000 SF
ASC/MOB 2 165,000 SF
Existing MOB 1 120,000 SF
BUILDING DESCRIPTION: AREA:

PHASE 2
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
MH
MH
MH
V V

V V V V V
s
V
MH
V V

FS/ SNF
44' 44'
52' 52'
44'

21.75'
63'
65'
63'
77'
74 0. 6' ROW
ROW
ROW

LUGONIA AVENUE

ALMOND AVENUE

CALIFORNIA STREET
MOB 3
4-STORY

PARKING SETBACK
30'
30'
2 5'
2 5'

LANDSCAPE

STREET FRONTAGE
25'
62' - 2"

PASSENGER LOADING
85' - 4"
46 HC
57 STD + 15 HC
13 STD + 9 HC
17 STD
20 STD
20 STD
111 STD
20 HC
55 STD + 20 HC
47 STD
50 STD
49 STD
14 STD 32 STD + 2 HC
39 STD
15 STD + 2 HC 13 STD + 9 HC
28 STD + 2 HC
32 STD
10 STD20 STD28 STD
18 STD
21 STD
29 STD
18 STD
9 STD + 13 HC
35 STD
40 STD
40 STD
18 HC
50 STD 37 STD 73 STD
26 STD
54 STD
51 STD50 STD50 STD65 STD
25 STD
197'

PARKING STRUCTURE
CUP
ASC / MOB 2

HOSPITAL
7-STORY
3-STORY
4-STORY
2-STORY
1,218 STD + 70 HC
6-LEVEL + BASEMENT

EXISTING
MOB 1
3-STORY
01 PASSENGER DROP-OFF

AIR-SOURCE

EQUIPMENT
YARD
2 5'
5' 26'
185' 135'

VEHICLE ACCESS

AMBULANCE ROUTE

CIRCULATION LEGEND

PHASING LEGEND

PEDESTRIAN PATH

SERVICE ROUTE

COMPLETE/PROPOSED

EXISTING

SITE PLAN LEGEND

DEVELOPED SITE AREA

LANDSCAPED AREA

SURFACE PARKING

PERIMETER WALL
Site Development Plan Number:

OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: 626.405.6333
Sheet:

REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER

CITY OF REDLANDS
As indicated
PHASE 3 SITE PLAN A 1.13
1 1" = 80'-0"
SITE - PHASE 3
MATERIAL NOTES:
01 CMU (6'-0")
2,554 2,805 226 226
Excess 251 25 25
MOB 3 5 per 1,000 sf 83,000 SF 415 415 10% 42 42
Central Utility Plant NA NA 0 0 NA 0 0
1 per peak Staff 501 Staff 501 501 2% 11 11
Hospital - 213 Beds 1 per Bed 213 Beds 213 213 2% 5 5
ASC/MOB 2 5 per 1,000 sf 165,000... 825 825 10% 83 83
Existing MOB 1 5 per 1,000 sf 120,000 SF 600 600 10% 60 60 BUILDING: REQUIREMENT: DEMAND: REQ: PROV: ADA %: ADA #: ADA PROV:

PARKING DESCRIPTION: PARKING TOTAL PROVIDED: ADA PORTION OF TOTAL:

Total Parking Area Landscape 102,000 SF 15%
Total Surface Parking Area 685,000 SF
Total Landscaped Area 593,000 SF 36%
Total Building Coverage 233,000 SF
Total Developed Site Area 1,632,000 SF
SITE COVERAGE: AREA: % COVERAGE
Total Building Area 803,000 SF
MOB 3 83,000 SF
Central Utility Plant 35,000 SF
Hospital 400,000 SF
ASC/MOB 2 165,000 SF
Existing MOB 1 120,000 SF
BUILDING DESCRIPTION: AREA:

PHASE 3
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
MH
MH
MH
V V

V V V V V
s
V
MH
V V

41.25'
44'

21.75'
63'

23.75'
65'
63'
77'

35.75'
5'
EX.12" AC WATER
EX.12" STEEL WATER
EX 1. 6 W" ATER
EX 1. 6 W" ATER
EX.12" AC WATER
EX.12" STEEL WATER
EX.8" PVC CLASS 200
EX.8" PVC CLASS 200
EX.8" PVC CLASS 200
EX.6" PVC CLASS 200
EX.15" SEWER
EX 2. 4" HDPE SD
EX 3. 0" HDPE SD
EX.6" SEWER
EX.66" SD (DRY)
EX.TELECOM
EX. FIBER OPTIC CABLE
EX. FIBER OPTIC CABLE
EX.12" WATER
EX.18" IRR (ABAN)
EX 2. "GAS
EX 2. "GAS
EX 2. "GAS
EX.66" SD (DRY)
EX. 12" NON POTABLE WATER
EX 2. "GAS
EX.12" AC WATER EX.12" AC WATER EX.12" AC WATER
EX.12" AC WATER
EX 2. "WATER
10" WATER FIRE SERV CI E
EX 2. "WATER
10" WATER FIRE SERV CI E
EX 2. "WATER
10" WATER FIRE SERV CI E
10" WATER FIRE SERV CI E
EX.8" SEWER
EX.8" SEWER EX.8" SEWER
EX 1. 6 W" ATER
EX.42" RCP EX.24" RCP
EX 1. 8" RCP
EX. 18" RCP
EX. 8"

CONCRETE
SEAL
EX. 24" RCP
EX. 42" CMP RISER
EX 1. 6 W" ATER
EX. 6" REC. WATER

EX V. ERIZON L NI E

EX V. ERIZON L NI E
EX. 12" NON POTABLE WATER
RETA WELBAT OP NON" 21. XE
EX. 6" REC. WATER EX. 6" REC. WATER
( )
C.O.C.
35'
233.23'
44' 44'
52' 52'
35'

41.25'
44'

21.75'
63'

23.75'
65'
63'
77'

35.75'
5'
50001
1143. 04

FS/ SNF
44' 44'
52' 52'
44'

21.75'
63'
65'
63'
77'
74 0. 6' ROW
ROW
ROW

LUGONIA AVENUE

ALMOND AVENUE

CALIFORNIA STREET

PARKING SETBACK
30'
30'
2 5'
2 5'

LANDSCAPE

STREET FRONTAGE
25'
62' - 2"

PARKING STRUCTURE
CUP
ASC / MOB 2

HOSPITAL
7-STORY
3-STORY
4-STORY
2-STORY
1,218 STD + 70 HC
6-LEVEL + BASEMENT

EXISTING
MOB 1
3-STORY
01 PASSENGER DROP-OFF

AIR-SOURCE

EQUIPMENT
YARD
123'
336'
26' 5'
459'

VEHICLE ACCESS

AMBULANCE ROUTE

CIRCULATION LEGEND

PHASING LEGEND

PEDESTRIAN PATH

SERVICE ROUTE

COMPLETE/PROPOSED

EXISTING

SITE PLAN LEGEND

DEVELOPED SITE AREA

LANDSCAPED AREA

SURFACE PARKING

PERIMETER WALL
Site Development Plan Number:

OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: 626.405.6333
Sheet:

REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER

CITY OF REDLANDS
As indicated
PHASE 4 SITE PLAN A 1.14
1 1" = 80'-0"
SITE - PHASE 4
MATERIAL NOTES:
01 CMU (6'-0")
2,711 2,805 226 226
Excess 94 21 21
1 per peak Staff 49 Staff 49 49 2% 1 1
Hospital Addition - 108 Beds 1 per Bed 108 Beds 108 108 2% 3 3 MOB 3 5 per 1,000 sf 83,000 SF 415 415 10% 42 42
Central Utility Plant NA NA 0 0 NA 0 0
1 per peak Staff 501 Staff 501 501 2% 11 11
Hospital - 213 Beds 1 per Bed 213 Beds 213 213 2% 5 5
ASC/MOB 2 5 per 1,000 sf 165,000... 825 825 10% 83 83
Existing MOB 1 5 per 1,000 sf 120,000 SF 600 600 10% 60 60 BUILDING: REQUIREMENT: DEMAND: REQ: PROV: ADA %: ADA #: ADA PROV:

PARKING DESCRIPTION: PARKING TOTAL PROVIDED: ADA PORTION OF TOTAL:

Total Parking Area Landscape 102,000 SF 15%
Total Surface Parking Area 685,000 SF
Total Landscaped Area 563,000 SF 35%
Total Building Coverage 263,000 SF
Total Developed Site Area 1,593,942 SF
SITE COVERAGE: AREA: % COVERAGE
Total Building Area 983,000 SF
Hospital Addition 180,000 SF
MOB 3 83,000 SF
Central Utility Plant 35,000 SF
Hospital 400,000 SF
ASC/MOB 2 165,000 SF
Existing MOB 1 120,000 SF
BUILDING DESCRIPTION: AREA:

PHASE 4
PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6

LUGONIA AVENUE

ALMOND AVENUE

CALIFORNIA STREET
MOB 2 / ASC EXISTING
MOB 1
PHASE 1A
PHASE 1B

PARKING

STRUCTURE
CUP
MOB 2 / ASC

HOSPITAL

EXISTING
MOB 1

LUGONIA AVENUE

ALMOND AVENUE

CALIFORNIA STREET
PHASE 2B PHASE 2A
MOB 3

PARKING

STRUCTURE
CUP
MOB 2 / ASC

HOSPITAL

EXISTING
MOB 1

LUGONIA AVENUE

ALMOND AVENUE

CALIFORNIA STREET
MOB 3

PARKING

STRUCTURE
CUP
MOB 2 / ASC

HOSPITAL

EXISTING
MOB 1

LUGONIA AVENUE

ALMOND AVENUE

CALIFORNIA STREET
Site Development Plan Number:

OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: 626.405.6333
Sheet:

REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER

CITY OF REDLANDS
1" = 200'-0"
CONSTRUCTION PHASING DIAGRAMS A 1.20
1 1" = 200'-0"
CONSTRUCTION PHASING - PHASE 1 2 1" = 200'-0"CONSTRUCTION PHASING - PHASE 2 3 1" = 200'-0"
CONSTRUCTION PHASING - PHASE 3 4 1" = 200'-0"CONSTRUCTION PHASING - PHASE 4 Construction Phasing: Phase 1A is developed first to provide replacement of parking removed during Phase 1B construction.

Construction Laydown area is used as necessary for construction activity.

Construction Phasing: Phase 2A with Parking Structure developed first to provide excess parking for MOB 1, MOB 2 and contractor parking during construction. Construction Laydown area is used as necessary for construction activity.

Construction Phasing: Excess parking from Phase 2 provides for construction parking. Construction Phasing: Excess parking from Phase 2 provides for construction parking.

PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO. 6
(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) TREE CALCULATIONS EXISTING PARKING LOT - TOTAL TREES - 148 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 24 TREES (16.22%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 124 TREES (83.78%) PROPOSED PARKING LOT (PHASE 1) - TOTAL TREES - 285 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 285 TREES (100%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 0 TREES (0%) TOTAL PARKING AREA (PHASE 1) - TOTAL TREES - 433 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 309 TREES (71.36%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 124 TREES (28.64%) TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA (PHASE 1) - TOTAL TREES - 797 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 539 TREES (67.63%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 258 TREES (32.37%) PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE TREESSYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE / FORM CINNAMONUM CAMPHORA CAMPHOR 24" BOX STD. CUPANIOPSIS ANACARDIODES CARROTWOOD 24" BOX STD. ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'TRUE GREEN' - OR - TIPUANA TIPU TRUE GREEN CHINESE ELM - OR - TIPU TREE 36" BOX STD. LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA 'PURPLE TOWER' PURPLE TOWER CREPE MYRTLE 24" BOX STD. LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 24" BOX STD. OLEA EUROPEA 'WILSONII' WILSON FRUITLESS OLIVE 36" BOX MULTI PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 24" BOX LOW BRCH QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 24" BOX STD. RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC 24" BOX STD. WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 24' BTH PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE TREES CITY OF REDLANDS Site Development Plan Number: OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: - Sheet: JANUARY 15, 2025 ADDRESS: - ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, DESIGNER: CO Architects, - PHONE: 323.525.0500 (Architect) ADDRESS: 5750 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 550, Los Angeles CA 90036 (Architect) TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: XXXXX LOCATION: - ZONE: CR ZONE ACCESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 0167-441-07 REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER 1" = 80'-0" LEGENDEXISTING PARKING LOT AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE EXISTING BUILDING HARDSCAPE / LANDSCAPE PROPOSED PARKING LOT AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE EXISTING FALLOW LOT TEMPORARY DETENTION BASIN UPDATED ENTRY AND ENTRY LANDSCAPE DECORATIVE DRY STREAM BED WITH BOULDERS AND PLANTING FOR FUTURE DETENTION BASIN DROP OFF AREA WITH DECORATIVE VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN PAVING DEPRESSED PRAIRIE GRASS AREA FOR FUTURE DETENTION BASIN PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE WITH SEATING / DINING OPPORTUNITIES FOCAL BRIDGE ELEMENT OVER BASIN DECORATIVE SEATING / DINING AREA DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAILS WITH SEATING / DINING OPPORTUNITIES AND PRAIRIE GRASS FIELDS BUILDING ENTRY STREET / PERIMETER LANDSCAPE SERVICE AREA VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 1234567 1112 8 101314159 EXISTING MOB CALIFORNIA ST. LUGONIA AVE. ALMOND AVE. PROPOSED ASC 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 8 7 8 14 1414 14 14 14 14 9 9 16 1010 10 14 11 13 13 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 12 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN (PHASE 1) L1.01 16 *REFER TO SHEET L2.01 FOR FULL PLANT SCHEDULE 17 17 17 NOTE: 1. 1. ALL SITE GRADING NOT TO EXCEED 3:1 - RETAINING WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IF NECESSARY. EVCSP § EV4.0275 JANUARY 31, 2025 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO.
6 (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) TREE CALCULATIONS EXISTING PARKING LOT - TOTAL TREES - 148 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 24 TREES (16.22%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 124 TREES (83.78%) PROPOSED PARKING LOT (PHASE 2) - TOTAL TREES - 258 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 258 TREES (100%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 0 TREES (0%) TOTAL PARKING AREA (PHASE 2) - TOTAL TREES - 406 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 282 TREES (69.46%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 124 TREES (30.54%) TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA (PHASE 2) - TOTAL TREES - 962 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 663 TREES (68.92%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 299 TREES (31.08%) PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE TREESSYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE / FORM CINNAMONUM CAMPHORA CAMPHOR 24" BOX STD. CUPANIOPSIS ANACARDIODES CARROTWOOD 24" BOX STD. ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'TRUE GREEN' - OR - TIPUANA TIPU TRUE GREEN CHINESE ELM - OR - TIPU TREE 36" BOX STD. LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA 'PURPLE TOWER' PURPLE TOWER CREPE MYRTLE 24" BOX STD. LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 24" BOX STD. OLEA EUROPEA 'WILSONII' WILSON FRUITLESS OLIVE 36" BOX MULTI PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 24" BOX LOW BRCH QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 24" BOX STD. RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC 24" BOX STD. WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 24' BTH PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE TREES CITY OF REDLANDS Site Development Plan Number: OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: - Sheet: JANUARY 15, 2025 ADDRESS: - ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, DESIGNER: CO Architects, - PHONE: 323.525.0500 (Architect) ADDRESS: 5750 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 550, Los Angeles CA 90036 (Architect) TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: XXXXX LOCATION: - ZONE: CR ZONE ACCESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 0167-441-07 REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER 1" = 80'-0" EXISTING MOB CALIFORNIA ST. LUGONIA AVE. ALMOND AVE. PROPOSED ASC PROPOSED HOSPITAL

PROPOSED
CUP PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 6 6 6 8 7 8 14 1414 14 14 14 14 9 9 1010 10 14 11 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 14 14 14 4 1515 15 15 333 33 3 3 3 3 5 14 7 1010 10 8 8 12 16 LEGENDEXISTING PARKING LOT AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE EXISTING BUILDING HARDSCAPE / LANDSCAPE PROPOSED PARKING LOT AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE EXISTING FALLOW LOT AMBULANCE DROP OFF UPDATED ENTRY AND ENTRY LANDSCAPE DETENTION BASIN - DECORATIVE DRY STREAM BED WITH BOULDERS AND PLANTING DROP OFF AREA WITH DECORATIVE VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN PAVING DEPRESSED PRAIRIE GRASS AREA FOR FUTURE DETENTION BASIN PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE WITH SEATING / DINING OPPORTUNITIES FOCAL BRIDGE ELEMENT OVER BASIN DECORATIVE SEATING / DINING AREA DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAILS WITH SEATING / DINING OPPORTUNITIES AND PRAIRIE GRASS FIELDS BUILDING ENTRY STREET / PERIMETER LANDSCAPE LOADING DOCK / SERVICE AREA VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 1234567 1112 8 10131415169 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN (PHASE 2) L1.02 12 13 13 13 16 16 *REFER TO SHEET L2.01 FOR FULL PLANT SCHEDULE 17 17 17 NOTE: 1. 1. ALL SITE GRADING NOT TO EXCEED 3:1 - RETAINING WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IF NECESSARY. EVCSP § EV4.0275 JANUARY 31, 2025 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO.
6 (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) TREE CALCULATIONS EXISTING PARKING LOT - TOTAL TREES - 148 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 24 TREES (16.22%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 124 TREES (83.78%) PROPOSED PARKING LOT (PHASE 3) - TOTAL TREES - 369 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 343 TREES (92.95%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 26 TREES (7.05%) TOTAL PARKING AREA (PHASE 3) - TOTAL TREES - 517 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 367 TREES (70.99%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 150 TREES (29.01%) TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA (PHASE 3) - TOTAL TREES - 1,065 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 727 TREES (68.26%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 338 TREES (31.74%) PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE TREESSYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE / FORM CINNAMONUM CAMPHORA CAMPHOR 24" BOX STD. CUPANIOPSIS ANACARDIODES CARROTWOOD 24" BOX STD. ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'TRUE GREEN' - OR - TIPUANA TIPU TRUE GREEN CHINESE ELM - OR - TIPU TREE 36" BOX STD. LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA 'PURPLE TOWER' PURPLE TOWER CREPE MYRTLE 24" BOX STD. LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 24" BOX STD. OLEA EUROPEA 'WILSONII' WILSON FRUITLESS OLIVE 36" BOX MULTI PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 24" BOX LOW BRCH QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 24" BOX STD. RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC 24" BOX STD. WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 24' BTH PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE TREES CITY OF REDLANDS Site Development Plan Number: OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: - Sheet: JANUARY 15, 2025 ADDRESS: - ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, DESIGNER: CO Architects, - PHONE: 323.525.0500 (Architect) ADDRESS: 5750 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 550, Los Angeles CA 90036 (Architect) TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: XXXXX LOCATION: - ZONE: CR ZONE ACCESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 0167-441-07 REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER 1" = 80'-0" LEGENDEXISTING PARKING LOT AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE EXISTING BUILDING HARDSCAPE / LANDSCAPE PROPOSED PARKING LOT AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE EXISTING FALLOW LOT AMBULANCE DROP OFF UPDATED ENTRY AND ENTRY LANDSCAPE DETENTION BASIN - DECORATIVE DRY STREAM BED WITH BOULDERS AND PLANTING DROP OFF AREA WITH DECORATIVE VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN PAVING LOADING DOCK / SERVICE AREA PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE WITH SEATING / DINING OPPORTUNITIES FOCAL BRIDGE ELEMENT OVER BASIN DECORATIVE SEATING / DINING AREA DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAILS WITH SEATING / DINING OPPORTUNITIES AND PRAIRIE GRASS FIELDS BUILDING ENTRY STREET / PERIMETER LANDSCAPE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE 1234567 1112810131415 EXISTING MOB CALIFORNIA ST. LUGONIA AVE. ALMOND AVE. PROPOSED ASC PROPOSED HOSPITAL

PROPOSED
CUP PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE PROPOSED MOB 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 6 6 6 8 7 8 14 1414 14 14 14 14 7 7 1010 10 14 11 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 14 14 14 1515 15 15 333 33 3 3 3 3 5 14 7 12 1010 10 8 8 12 9 14 14 8 13 13 3 3 3 3 9 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN (PHASE 3) L1.03 13 13 13 9 9 *REFER TO SHEET L2.01 FOR FULL PLANT SCHEDULE 16 16 16 NOTE: 1. 1. ALL SITE GRADING NOT TO EXCEED 3:1 - RETAINING WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IF NECESSARY. EVCSP § EV4.0275 JANUARY 31, 2025 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO.
6 (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E)(E) (E) (E) (E) (E) PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE TREESSYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE / FORM CINNAMONUM CAMPHORA CAMPHOR 24" BOX STD. CUPANIOPSIS ANACARDIODES CARROTWOOD 24" BOX STD. ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'TRUE GREEN' - OR - TIPUANA TIPU TRUE GREEN CHINESE ELM - OR - TIPU TREE 36" BOX STD. LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA 'PURPLE TOWER' PURPLE TOWER CREPE MYRTLE 24" BOX STD. LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 24" BOX STD. OLEA EUROPEA 'WILSONII' WILSON FRUITLESS OLIVE 36" BOX MULTI PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 24" BOX LOW BRCH QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 24" BOX STD. RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC 24" BOX STD. WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 24' BTH PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE TREES TREE CALCULATIONS EXISTING PARKING LOT - TOTAL TREES - 148 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 24 TREES (16.22%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 124 TREES (83.78%) PROPOSED PARKING LOT (PHASE 4) - TOTAL TREES - 369 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 343 TREES (92.95%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 26 TREES (7.05%) TOTAL PARKING AREA (PHASE 4) - TOTAL TREES - 517 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 367 TREES (70.99%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 150 TREES (29.01%) TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA (PHASE 4) - TOTAL TREES - 1,037 TREES - EVERGREEN TREES - 710 TREES (68.47%) - DECIDUOUS TREES - 327 TREES (31.53%) CITY OF REDLANDS Site Development Plan Number: OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: - Sheet: JANUARY 15, 2025 ADDRESS: - ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, DESIGNER: CO Architects, - PHONE: 323.525.0500 (Architect) ADDRESS: 5750 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 550, Los Angeles CA 90036 (Architect) TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: XXXXX LOCATION: - ZONE: CR ZONE ACCESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 0167-441-07 REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER 1" = 80'-0" 12345678 EXISTING MOB CALIFORNIA ST. LUGONIA AVE. ALMOND AVE. PROPOSED ASC PROPOSED HOSPITAL

PROPOSED
CUP PROPOSED PARKING STRUCTURE PROPOSED MOB 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 6 6 6 8 7 8 14 1414 14 14 14 14 7 7 1010 10 14 11 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 14 14 14 1515 15 15 333 33 3 3 3 3 5 14 12 7 1010 10 8 8 12 9 14 14 8 13 13 3 3 3 3 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN (PHASE 4) L1.04 LEGENDEXISTING PARKING LOT AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE EXISTING BUILDING HARDSCAPE / LANDSCAPE PROPOSED PARKING LOT AND PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE EXISTING FALLOW LOT AMBULANCE DROP OFF UPDATED ENTRY AND ENTRY LANDSCAPE DETENTION BASIN - DECORATIVE DRY STREAM BED WITH BOULDERS AND PLANTING DROP OFF AREA WITH DECORATIVE VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN PAVING LOADING DOCK / SERVICE AREA PEDESTRIAN PROMENADE WITH SEATING / DINING OPPORTUNITIES FOCAL BRIDGE ELEMENT OVER BASIN DECORATIVE SEATING / DINING AREA DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAILS WITH SEATING / DINING OPPORTUNITIES AND PRAIRIE GRASS FIELDS BUILDING ENTRY STREET / PERIMETER LANDSCAPE VISIBILITY TRIANGLES 1112101314159 *REFER TO SHEET L2.01 FOR FULL PLANT SCHEDULE 9 9 16 16 16 NOTE: 1. 1. ALL SITE GRADING NOT TO EXCEED 3:1 - RETAINING WALLS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IF NECESSARY. EVCSP § EV4.0275 JANUARY 31, 2025 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO.
6 BACKGROUND SHRUBS SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING WATER USE DESCRIPTION FURCRAEA MACDOUGALLII MACDOUGALLS CENTURY PLANT 5 GAL. 60" O.C. L SUCCULENT ACCENT OLEA X MONTRA 'LITTLE OLLIE' LITTLE OLLIE 5 GAL. 36" O.C. L HEDGE LEUCOPHYLLUM F. 'GREEN CLOUD' TEXAS RANGER 5 GAL. 48" O.C. L LARGE FLOWERING WESTRINGIA FRUTICOSA 'WYNYABBIE GEM' WYNYABBIE GEM COAST ROSEMARY 5 GAL. 42" O.C. L HEDGE MIDGROUND SHRUBS SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING WATER USE DESCRIPTION AGAVE OVATIFOLIA WHALE'S TONGUE AGAVE 5 GAL. 48" O.C. L SUCCULENT ACCENT MUHLENBERGIA EMERSLEYI 'EL TORO' BULL GRASS 1 GAL. 36" O.C. L ORNAMENTAL GRASS RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA 'MINOR' DWARF YEDDO HAWTHORN 5 GAL. 36" O.C. M FLOWERING ACCENT CALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN' LITTLE JOHN DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH 5 GAL. 36" O.C. L FLOWERING ACCENT BACCHARIS PILULARIS 'TWIN PEAKS' TWIN PEAKS COYOTE BRUSH 5 GAL. 36" O.C. L CALIFORNIA NATIVE FOREGROUND SHRUBS SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING WATER USE DESCRIPTION DIANELLA 'LITTLE REV' LITTLE REV FLAX LILY 1 GAL. 24" O.C. L STRAPPY ACCENT CAREX DIVULSA BERKELEY SEDGE 1 GAL. 30" O.C. L ORNAMENTAL GRASS FESTUCA MAIREI ATLAS FESCUE 1 GAL. 30" O.C. L ORNAMENTAL GRASS HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA RED YUCCA 1 GAL. 36" O.C. L FLOWERING ACCENT LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'LOMLON' LOMLON MOOR GRASS 1 GAL. 36" O.C. M ORNAMENTAL GRASS GROUNDCOVERS SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING WATER USE DESCRIPTION ACACIA REDOLENS 'LOW BOY' PROSTRATE ACACIA 1 GAL. 8' O.C. VL EVERGREEN GROUNDCOVER BACCHARIS P. 'PIGEON POINT' DWARF COYOTE BRUSH 1 GAL. 48" O.C. L EVERGREEN GROUNDCOVER LANTANA 'NEW GOLD' NEW GOLD LANTANA 1 GAL. 36" O.C. L FLOWERING GROUNDCOVER SESLERIA AUTUMNALIS 'GREENLEE' GREENLEE MOOR GRASS 1 GAL. 18" O.C. M FLOWERING GROUNDCOVER ROSMARINUS O. 'PROSTRATUS' PROSTRATE ROSEMARY FLATS 12" O.C. L EVERGREEN GROUNDCOVER BIOSWALE GRASSES SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING WATER USE DESCRIPTION CAREX DIVULSA BERKELEY SEDGE 1 GAL. 24" O.C. L BIOSWALE GRASS CHONDROPETALUM TECTORUM CAPE RUSH 5 GAL. 36" O.C. M BIOSWALE GRASS JUNCUS PATENS CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH 1 GAL. 18" O.C. L BIOSWALE GRASS VINES SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING WATER USE DESCRIPTION DISTICTUS BUCCINATORIA BLOOD-RED TRUMPET VINE 1 GAL./ STAKED PER PLAN M FLOWERING VINE WATER USE KEY: VL = VERY LOW WATER USE, L = LOW WATER USE, M = MODERATE WATER USE, H = HIGH WATER USE. WATER USE STATED IS PER 'WATER USE CLASSIFICATION OF LANDSCAPE SPECIES' (ALSO REFERRED TO AS WUCOLS IV) FOR THE CITY OF REDLANDS PROPOSED PLANT PALETTE TREESSYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE / FORM INSTALL SIZE WATER USE DESCRIPTION MATURE SIZE (AT 15 YEARS) CINNAMONUM CAMPHORA CAMPHOR 24" BOX STD. 8'H X 4'W X 1-1/4"CAL. M CALIFORNIA STREET TREE 22'H X 20'W X 4"CAL. CUPANIOPSIS ANACARDIODES CARROTWOOD 24" BOX STD. 6'H X 3'W X 1-1/4"CAL. M LUGONIA STREET TREE 24'H X 20'W X 4"CAL. ULMUS PARVIFOLIA 'TRUE GREEN' - OR - TIPUANA TIPU TRUE GREEN CHINESE ELM - OR - TIPU TREE 36" BOX STD. 10'H X 5'W X 2"CAL. M CANOPY SHADE TREE 25'H X 25'W X 4"CAL. LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA 'PURPLE TOWER' PURPLE TOWER CREPE MYRTLE 24" BOX STD. 6'H X 3'W X 1-1/4"CAL. L SMALL DECIDUOUS ACCENT 14'H X 12'W X 3"CAL. LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS BRISBANE BOX 24" BOX STD. 8'H X 3'W X 1-1/4"CAL. M PERIMETER EDGE 25'H X 10'W X 4"CAL. OLEA EUROPEA 'WILSONII' WILSON FRUITLESS OLIVE 36" BOX MULTI 8'H X 5'W X (3) 1.5"CAL. VL EVERGREEN MULTI TRUNK FOCAL TREE 20'H X 24'W X (3) 3"CAL. PLATANUS RACEMOSA CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE 24" BOX LOW BRCH 8'H X 3'W X 1-1/4"CAL. M CONIFEROUS SCREEN 25'H X 18'W X 4"CAL. QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA COAST LIVE OAK 24" BOX STD. 6'H X 3'W X 1-1/4"CAL. L EVERGREEN CANOPY 24'H X 20'W X 4"CAL. RHUS LANCEA AFRICAN SUMAC 24" BOX STD. 6'H X 3'W X 1-1/4"CAL. L PARKING AREA SHADE CANOPY 20'H X 24'W X 4"CAL. WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 24' BTH 24'H X 8'W X 18" CAL. L CALIFORNIA STREET SKYLINE PALM 35'H X 8'W X 30"CAL. CITY OF REDLANDS Site Development Plan Number: OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: - Sheet: JANUARY 15, 2025 ADDRESS: - ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, DESIGNER: CO Architects, - PHONE: 323.525.0500 (Architect) ADDRESS: 5750 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 550, Los Angeles CA 90036 (Architect) TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: XXXXX LOCATION: - ZONE: CR ZONE ACCESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 0167-441-07 REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER 1" = 80'-0" CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE IMAGERY TREES CINNAMOMUM CAMPHORA / CAMPHOR BACKGROUND SHRUBS ..\..\..\..\Images\Plant Material\Trees\Olea\Olea E. Wilsonii\Olea%20Wilsonii%202.jpg CUPANIOPSIS ANACARDIOIDES / CARROTWOOD LAGERSTROEMIA I. 'PURPLE TOWER' / PURPLE TOWER CREPE MYRTLE LOPHOSTEMON CONFERTUS / BRISBANE BOX WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA / CALIFORNIA FAN PALM RHUS LANCEA / AFRICAN SUMAC QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA / COAST LIVE OAK PLATANUS RACEMOSA / CALIFORNIA SYCAMORE OLEA EUROPEA 'WILSONII' / WILSON FRUITLESS OLIVE WESTRINGIA 'WYNYABBIE GEM' / COAST ROSEMARY FURCRAEA MACDOUGALLII / MACDOUGALLS CENTURY PLANT OLEA E. 'MONTRA' / LITTLE OLLIE DWARF OLIVE LEUCOPHYLLUM F. 'GREEN CLOUD' / TEXAS RANGER MIDGROUND SHRUBS FOREGROUND SHRUBS GROUNDCOVERS BIOSWALE GRASSES VINES MUHLENBERGIA 'EL TORO' / BULL GRASS DIANELLA 'LITTLE REV' / LITTLE REV FLAX LILY ACACIA R. 'LOWBOY' / PROSTRATE ACACIA RHAPHIOLEPIS U. 'MINOR' / DWARF YEDDO HAWTHORN AGAVE OVATIFOLIA / WHALE'S TONGUE AGAVE CALLISTEMON 'LITTLE JOHN' / DWARF BOTTLE BRUSH BACCHARIS P. 'TWIN PEAKS' / TWIN PEAKS COYOTE BRUSH LOMONDRA L. 'LOMLON' / LOMLON MOOR GRASS HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA / RED YUCCA FESTUCA MAIREI / ATLAS FESCUE BACCHARIS P. 'PIGEON POINT' / DWARF COYOTE BRUSH LANTANA 'NEW GOLD' / NEW GOLD LANTANA SESLERIA A. 'GREENLEE' / GREENLEE MOOR GRASS ROSMARINUS O. 'PROSTRATUS' / PROSTRATE ROSEMARY DISTICTIS BUCCINATORIA / BLOOD-RED TRUMPET VINE JUNCUS PATENS / CALIFORNIA GRAY RUSH CAREX TUMICOLA / FOOTHILL SEDGE ULMUS P. 'TRUE GREEN' / TRUE GREEN CHINESE ELM TIPUANA TIPU / TIPU TREE CAREX DIVULSA / BERKELEY SEDGE CAREX DIVULSA / BERKELEY SEDGE L2.01 JANUARY 31, 2025 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT NO.
6 ASC/HOSPITAL
1150' - 3"
Level 2
1164' - 9"
Level 3
1179' - 3"
Level 4
1193' - 9"
280' - 2"
14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6"
62' - 0" 6' - 6"
68' - 6"

ASC ROOF
1208' - 3"

ASC/HOSPITAL
1150' - 3"
Level 2
1164' - 9"
Level 3
1179' - 3"
Level 4
1193' - 9"
280' - 2"
62' - 0" 6' - 6"
68' - 6"

ASC ROOF
1208' - 3"
14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6"

ASC/HOSPITAL
1150' - 3"
Level 2
1164' - 9"
Level 3
1179' - 3"
Level 4
1193' - 9"
226' - 2"
14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6"
6' - 6" 62' - 0"
68' - 6"

ASC ROOF
1208' - 3"
17' - 4"

METAL PANEL - PATTERNED

EXTERIOR MATERIAL TYPES

METAL PANEL - SMOOTH WITH INTEGRAL GLAZING

CURTAIN WALL

METAL PANEL - VERTICAL
Site Development Plan Number:

OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: 626.405.6333
Sheet:

MAY 12, 2023
ADDRESS: 393 E. Walnut Street, 4th Floor, Pasadena, CA 91188 ARCHITECT, ENGINEER, DESIGNER: CO Architects, Michael Baker Intl., Ridge Landscape Architects PHONE: 323.525.0500 (Architect) ADDRESS: 5750 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 550, Los Angeles CA 90036 (Architect) TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT: XXXXX
LOCATION: 1301 California Street, Redlands, CA 92374
ZONE: CR ZONE ACCESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 0167-441-07

REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER

CITY OF REDLANDS
1" = 20'-0"
ASC / MOB 2 ELEVATIONS A 3.10
1 1" = 20'-0"

NORTH ELEVATION
2 1" = 20'-0"

SOUTH ELEVATION
3 1" = 20'-0"

EAST ELEVATION
JANUARY 31, 2025

ASC/HOSPITAL
1150' - 3"
ASC / MOB 2
LEVEL 2
1165' - 3"
LEVEL 3
1180' - 9"
LEVEL 4
1195' - 3"
LEVEL 5
1209' - 9"
LEVEL 6
1224' - 3"
LEVEL 7
1238' - 9"

HOSPITAL BASEMENT
1135' - 3"

HOSPITAL ROOF
1253' - 3"
T.O. PARAPET
1268' - 3"
15' - 0" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 15' - 6" 15' - 0" 15' - 0" 118' - 0"
298' - 11" 97' - 11" 87' - 2"

ASC/HOSPITAL
1150' - 3"
ASC / MOB 2
LEVEL 2
1165' - 3"
LEVEL 3
1180' - 9"
LEVEL 4
1195' - 3"
LEVEL 5
1209' - 9"
LEVEL 6
1224' - 3"
LEVEL 7
1238' - 9"

HOSPITAL BASEMENT
1135' - 3"

HOSPITAL ROOF
1253' - 3"
T.O. PARAPET
1268' - 3"
15' - 0" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 15' - 6" 15' - 0" 15' - 0" 118' - 0"
374' - 6"

METAL PANEL- SMOOTH WITH INTEGRAL GLAZING

EXTERIOR MATERIAL TYPES

PAINTED METAL FRAME AND SUNSHADE

CURTAIN WALL
Site Development Plan Number:

OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: 626.405.6333
Sheet:

REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER

CITY OF REDLANDS
As indicated
HOSPITAL PHASE 2 ELEVATIONS A 3.11A
1 1" = 20'-0"
HOSPITAL PHASE 1 EAST ELEVATION
2 1" = 20'-0"
HOSPITAL PHASE 1 SOUTH ELEVATION
JANUARY 31, 2025

ASC/HOSPITAL
1150' - 3"
LEVEL 2
1165' - 3"
LEVEL 3
1180' - 9"
LEVEL 4
1195' - 3"
LEVEL 5
1209' - 9"
LEVEL 6
1224' - 3"
LEVEL 7
1238' - 9"

HOSPITAL BASEMENT
1135' - 3"

HOSPITAL ROOF
1253' - 3"
T.O. PARAPET
1268' - 3"
15' - 0" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 15' - 6" 15' - 0" 15' - 0" 118' - 0"
87' - 2" 97' - 11" 297' - 4"

ASC/HOSPITAL
1150' - 3"
LEVEL 2
1165' - 3"
LEVEL 3
1180' - 9"
LEVEL 4
1195' - 3"
LEVEL 5
1209' - 9"
LEVEL 6
1224' - 3"
LEVEL 7
1238' - 9"

HOSPITAL BASEMENT
1135' - 3"

HOSPITAL ROOF
1253' - 3"
T.O. PARAPET
1268' - 3"
15' - 0" 15' - 0" 15' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 15' - 0" 118' - 0"
374' - 6"

METAL PANEL- SMOOTH WITH INTEGRAL GLAZING

EXTERIOR MATERIAL TYPES

PAINTED METAL FRAME AND SUNSHADE

CURTAIN WALL
Site Development Plan Number:

OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: 626.405.6333
Sheet:

REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER

CITY OF REDLANDS
1" = 20'-0"
HOSPITAL PHASE 2 ELEVATIONS A 3.11B
1 1" = 20'-0"
HOSPITAL PHASE 1 WEST ELEVATION
2 1" = 20'-0"
HOSPITAL PHASE 1 NORTH ELEVATION
JANUARY 31, 2025
PARKING LEVEL 1
1149' - 0"
PARKING LEVEL 2
1160' - 4"
PARKING LEVEL 3
1170' - 6"
PARKING LEVEL 4
1180' - 8"
PARKING LEVEL 5
1190' - 10"
PARKING LEVEL 6
1201' - 0"
T. O. PARKING PARAPET
1219' - 0"
18' - 0" 10' - 2" 10' - 2" 10' - 2" 10' - 2" 11' - 4"
58' - 9"
70' - 0"
386' - 0"

SOLAR PANELS
PARKING LEVEL 1
1149' - 0"
PARKING LEVEL 2
1160' - 4"
PARKING LEVEL 3
1170' - 6"
PARKING LEVEL 4
1180' - 8"
PARKING LEVEL 5
1190' - 10"
PARKING LEVEL 6
1201' - 0"
T. O. PARKING PARAPET
1219' - 0"
18' - 0" 10' - 2" 10' - 2" 10' - 2" 10' - 2" 11' - 4"
386' - 3"
58' - 9"
70' - 0"

SOLAR PANELS

METAL PANEL

EXTERIOR MATERIAL TYPES

PAINTED CONCRETE

CMU ELEVATOR TOWER

CHANNEL GLASS

MESH SCREEN FOR FALL PROTECTION
Site Development Plan Number:

OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: 626.405.6333
Sheet:

REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER

CITY OF REDLANDS
1" = 20'-0"
PARKING STRUCTURE ELEVATIONS A 3.12
3 1" = 20'-0"

NORTH ELEVATION
4 1" = 20'-0"

SOUTH ELEVATION
1 1" = 20'-0"
EAST ELEVATION 2 1" = 20'-0"WEST ELEVATION
JANUARY 31, 2025
LEVEL 01
1150' - 0"
LEVEL 02
1164' - 6"
LEVEL 03
1179' - 0"
LEVEL 04
1193' - 6"
MOB 3 ROOF
1208' - 0" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6"
58' - 0"
196' - 7"
62' - 0" 6' - 0"
68' - 0"
LEVEL 01
1150' - 0"
LEVEL 02
1164' - 6"
LEVEL 03
1179' - 0"
LEVEL 04
1193' - 6"
MOB 3 ROOF
1208' - 0"
196' - 7"
62' - 0" 6' - 0"
68' - 0"
14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6"
58' - 0"
LEVEL 01
1150' - 0"
LEVEL 02
1164' - 6"
LEVEL 03
1179' - 0"
LEVEL 04
1193' - 6"
MOB 3 ROOF
1208' - 0"
14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6"
58' - 0"
135' - 5"
6' - 0" 62' - 0"
68' - 0"
LEVEL 01
1150' - 0"
LEVEL 02
1164' - 6"
LEVEL 03
1179' - 0"
LEVEL 04
1193' - 6"
MOB 3 ROOF
1208' - 0"
14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6"
58' - 0"
135' - 5"
6' - 0" 62' - 0"
68' - 0"

METAL PANEL - SMOOTH WITH INTEGRAL GLAZING

EXTERIOR MATERIAL TYPES

CURTAIN WALL

METAL PANEL - VERTICAL
Site Development Plan Number:

OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: 626.405.6333
Sheet:

REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER

CITY OF REDLANDS
1" = 20'-0"
MOB 3 ELEVATIONS A 3.13
1 1" = 20'-0"

NORTH ELEVATION
3 1" = 20'-0"

SOUTH ELEVATION
2 1" = 20'-0"

EAST ELEVATION
4 1" = 20'-0"

WEST ELEVATION
JANUARY 31, 2025

ASC/HOSPITAL
1150' - 3"
PHASE 2 HOSPITAL
LEVEL 2
1165' - 3"
LEVEL 3
1180' - 9"
LEVEL 4
1195' - 3"
LEVEL 5
1209' - 9"
LEVEL 6
1224' - 3"
LEVEL 7
1238' - 9"

HOSPITAL BASEMENT
1135' - 3"
T.O. PARAPET.
1238' - 9"
14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 15' - 6" 15' - 0" 15' - 0" 88' - 6"
326' - 7"
Original Level
-19' - 0"

ASC/HOSPITAL
1150' - 3"
LEVEL 2
1165' - 3"
LEVEL 3
1180' - 9"
LEVEL 4
1195' - 3"
LEVEL 5
1209' - 9"
LEVEL 6
1224' - 3"
LEVEL 7
1238' - 9"

HOSPITAL BASEMENT
1135' - 3"
T.O. PARAPET.
1238' - 9"
15' - 0" 15' - 0" 15' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 88' - 6"
98' - 1"

ASC/HOSPITAL
1150' - 3"
PHASE 2 HOSPITAL
LEVEL 2
1165' - 3"
LEVEL 3
1180' - 9"
LEVEL 4
1195' - 3"
LEVEL 5
1209' - 9"
LEVEL 6
1224' - 3"

HOSPITAL BASEMENT
1135' - 3"
T.O. PARAPET.
1238' - 9"
14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 14' - 6" 15' - 6" 15' - 0" 15' - 0" 88' - 6"
326' - 7"

METAL PANEL- SMOOTH WITH INTEGRAL GLAZING

EXTERIOR MATERIAL TYPES

PAINTED METAL FRAME AND SUNSHADE

CURTAIN WALL
Site Development Plan Number:

OWNER: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals PHONE: 626.405.6333
Sheet:

REDLANDS MEDICAL CENTER

CITY OF REDLANDS
1" = 20'-0"
HOSPITAL PHASE 4 ELEVATIONS A 3.14
3 1" = 20'-0"
HOSPITAL PHASE 4 EAST ELEVATION
2 1" = 20'-0"
HOSPITAL PHASE 4 NORTH ELEVATION 1 1" = 20'-0"HOSPITAL PHASE 4 WEST ELEVATION JANUARY 31, 2025
DRAFT Kaiser Redlands
Expansion
Transportation Study
Prepared for:

City of Redlands
February 2025
OC22-0875.01
Kaiser Redlands
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 7 Project Description .............................................................................................................................................................. 7 Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis ........................................................................................................................ 8 Mitigation Measures ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Level of Service (LOS) Analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 8

1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 10 Project Description ....................................................................................................................................................................10 Study Area .....................................................................................................................................................................................12 Analysis Scenarios ......................................................................................................................................................................14 LOS Intersection Analysis ...............................................................................................................................................14

2. Significance Criteria and Analysis Methodologies .............................................................. 15 VMT Analysis Methodology ...................................................................................................................................................15 Thresholds of Significance .............................................................................................................................................16 Level of Service (LOS) Analysis Methodology .................................................................................................................16

3. Existing Conditions ................................................................................................................. 18 Existing Roadway Facilities .....................................................................................................................................................18 Regional Access Facilities ...............................................................................................................................................18 Local Access Roads ...........................................................................................................................................................18 Bicycle Facilities ...........................................................................................................................................................................18 Pedestrian Facilities ...................................................................................................................................................................21 Existing Transit Service .............................................................................................................................................................21 Metrolink ...............................................................................................................................................................................21 Omnitrans .............................................................................................................................................................................22 Existing Year (2024) Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................................................................22 Data Collection ...................................................................................................................................................................22 Existing (2024) Intersection Operations ............................................................................................................................22

4. Project Characteristics ............................................................................................................ 25 Project Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................................................25 Project Trip Distribution ..........................................................................................................................................................26

5. Vehicle Miles Traveled ............................................................................................................ 29 Travel Demand Model ..............................................................................................................................................................29 Analysis Scenarios ......................................................................................................................................................................29 VMT Results ..................................................................................................................................................................................30 Project-Generated VMT ..................................................................................................................................................30 Additional Data ...........................................................................................................................................................................30

6. Existing (2024) Plus Project Conditions ................................................................................ 32 Existing (2024) Intersection Operations ............................................................................................................................32

7. Site Access and Parking .......................................................................................................... 35 Vehicle Access .............................................................................................................................................................................35 Emergency Vehicle Access .....................................................................................................................................................35 Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Access..............................................................................................................................35 Parking............................................................................................................................................................................................36

8. Mitigation and Improvements ............................................................................................... 38 VMT Mitigation ...........................................................................................................................................................................38 LOS Improvements ....................................................................................................................................................................40 Existing Year (2024) Plus Project Intersection Improvements ..................................................................................40 Appendices
Appendix A: Scoping Memorandum
Appendix B: Existing Traffic Counts
Appendix C: LOS Worksheets
Appendix D: Kaiser Provided Data
Appendix E: Signal Warrant
List of Figures
Figure 1: Project Site Plan .............................................................................................................................................................. 11 Figure 2: Project Study Area .......................................................................................................................................................... 13 Figure 3: Existing (2024) Turning Movements and Lane Configurations .................................................................... 24 Figure 4: Project Trip Distribution ............................................................................................................................................... 27 Figure 5: Project Trip Assignment ............................................................................................................................................... 28 Figure 6: Existing (2024) Plus Project Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations ..................................................... 34 List of Tables
Table 1: Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Grades ............................................................................................................. 16 Table 2: Existing (2024) Intersection Level of Service ......................................................................................................... 23 Table 3: Trip Generation Rates ..................................................................................................................................................... 25 Table 4: Project SED Information ................................................................................................................................................ 29 Table 5: Project-Generated PA VMT Estimates ...................................................................................................................... 30 Table 6: Existing (2024) Plus Project Intersection Level of Service ................................................................................ 33 Table 7: Required Parking .............................................................................................................................................................. 36 Table 8: VMT Mitigation Measures............................................................................................................................................. 38 Table 9: Existing Year (2024) Plus Project Intersection LOS with Improvements ..................................................... 41 Page | 7
Executive Summary
Fehr & Peers has completed a transportation analysis for the proposed expansion of the Kaiser campus (Project) in Redlands, California. The current Project site contains a 120,000 square foot Kaiser Medical Office Building (MOB). The Project will be an expansion of the remaining undeveloped land on the property site. The expansion consists of various medical facilities and land uses.

This study presents the Level of Service (LOS) analysis consistent with City of Redlands Measure U Growth Management Initiative. This study also presents Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) analysis for the Project and is consistent with requirements of Senate Bill 743 (SB 743), the Office of Planning and Research’s (OPR’s) Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December 2018), and the City of Redlands CEQA Assessment VMT Analysis Guidelines (2020) (City’s VMT Analysis Guidelines).

Project Description
The Project is located on the northwest corner of California Street and Lugonia Avenue bounded by California Street to the east, an existing Ashley Furniture Distribution Center to the west, Almond Avenue to the north, and Lugonia Avenue to the south. The expansion is proposed to occur in four phases:

Phase One
 165,000 sf maximum, 4-story Ambulatory Surgery Center/Medical Office Building 2 (ASC/MOB 2) (shown as MOB 2/ASC in the site plan)
Phase Two
 400,000 square feet of Hospital comprising of 213 beds  35,000 square foot Central Utility Plant (shown as CUP in the site plan).  464,000 square feet (6 level- 1218 parking stalls, 70 handicap stalls) Medical Center Parking Structure
Phase Three
 83,000 square feet of MOB (shown as MOB 3 in the site plan) Phase Four
 180,000 square foot expansion to the Phase Tow Hospital comprising of an additional 108 beds, 5 stories, and basement
Access to the Project will be provided by the two existing full access driveways located along California Street and Lugonia Avenue. The full buildout of the Project proposes three additional driveways, one on Lugonia Avenue (west of the existing Lugonia Avenue driveway) and two on Almond Avenue. All driveways will provide full access to the Project, but the two most west driveways on Almond Avenue and Lugonia Avenue will primarily service ambulances and delivery trucks.

Page | 8
Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis
A summary of the VMT assessment is provided below:
 The VMT assessment determined that the Project is forecasted to generate VMT at a rate higher than the City’s threshold.
 The Project has unique characteristics as a Kaiser facility – it only serves patients who are Kaiser members. The regional travel model may not fully capture this, and data provided by Kaiser shows that trip lengths for existing Kaiser members and employees would be reduced by providing an expanded campus in Redlands.

Mitigation Measures
Mitigation measures were identified to reduce project generated commute VMT below the City level of significance.
 Implement Commute Trip Reduction Marketing
 Provide Employer Sponsored Rideshare Program
 Provide End-of-Trip Bike Facilities for Commuters
 Provide Employer-Sponsored Vanpool Program
Even with the maximum VMT reduction provided by available mitigation measures, the Project would generate VMT greater than the City’s threshold of significance.

Level of Service (LOS) Analysis
The following scenarios were analyzed for the LOS analysis:
 Existing (2024) Baseline Conditions
 Existing (2024) Plus Project Conditions
Within the Existing (2024) Baseline Conditions scenario, the following intersections operate with acceptable conditions.

1. California Street and San Bernardino Avenue

2. California Street and Almond Avenue

3. California Street and Lugonia Avenue

4. California Street and Orange Tree Lane

5. California Street and I-10 Westbound Ramps

6. California Street and I-10 Eastbound Ramps

7. California Street and Redlands Boulevard

8. Mountain View Avenue and Almond Avenue
Page | 9
The LOS Analysis showed that during the Existing (2024) Conditions, two study intersections have deficient operations during the PM peak hour:

9. Mountain View Avenue and I-10 Westbound Ramps

10. Mountain View Avenue and I-10 Eastbound Ramps
In the Existing (2024) Plus Project Conditions scenario, the following intersections and Project driveways operate with acceptable conditions based on City guidelines:

1. California Street and San Bernardino Avenue

2. California Street and Almond Avenue

4. California Street and Orange Tree Lane

6. California Street and I-10 Eastbound Ramps

8. Mountain View Avenue and Almond Avenue

9. Mountain View Avenue and I-10 Westbound Ramps
B. Driveway B and Lugonia Avenue
C. Driveway C and Lugonia Avenue
D. Driveway D and Almond Avenue
E. Driveway E and Almond Avenue
The LOS Analysis showed that during the Existing (2024) Plus Project Conditions scenario, three study intersections and one project driveway operate below acceptable conditions. To address these issues, Fehr & Peers identified optimized signal timing at the study intersections and completed a signal warrant at the Project driveway. The deficient study intersections and Project driveway are listed below:

3. California Street and Lugonia Avenue

5. California Street and I-10 Westbound Ramps

10. Mountain View Avenue and I-10 Eastbound Ramps
A. California Street and Driveway A
With the identified signal timing improvements at intersections 3, 5, and 10, and with the installation of a new traffic signal at California Street and Driveway A, all deficient intersections operate acceptably.

Page | 10

1. Introduction
Fehr & Peers has completed a transportation analysis for the proposed expansion of the Kaiser campus (Project) in Redlands, California. The current Project site contains a 120,000 square foot Kaiser Medical Office Building (MOB). The Project will be an expansion on the remaining undeveloped land on the property site. The expansion consists of various medical facilities and land uses.

This chapter outlines the project description, geographic scope of the transportation impact analysis, and analysis scenarios.

Project Description
The Project is located on the northwest corner of California Street Lugonia Avenue bounded by California Street to the east, an existing Ashley Furniture Distribution Center to the west, Almond Avenue to the north, and Lugonia Avenue to the south. The expansion is proposed to occur in four phases:

Phase One
 165,000 sf maximum, 4-story Ambulatory Surgery Center/Medical Office Building 2 (ASC/MOB 2) (shown as MOB 2/ASC in the site plan)
Phase Two
 400,000 square feet of Hospital comprising of 213 beds  35,000 square foot Central Utility Plant (shown as CUP in the site plan).  464,000 square feet (6 level- 1218 parking stalls, 70 handicap stalls) Medical Center Parking Structure
Phase Three
 83,000 square feet of MOB (shown as MOB 3 in the site plan) Phase Four
 180,000 square foot expansion to the Phase Two Hospital comprising of an additional 108 beds, 5 stories, and basement
Access to the Project will be provided by the two existing full access driveways located along California Street and Lugonia Avenue. The full buildout of the Project proposes three additional driveways, one on Lugonia Avenue (west of the existing Lugonia Avenue driveway) and two on Almond Avenue. All driveways will provide full access to the Project, but the two most west driveways on Almond Avenue and Lugonia Avenue will primarily service ambulances and delivery trucks.

Figure 1
Project Site Plan
Page | 12
Study Area
The City of Redlands does not currently have traffic study guidelines that detail the requirements for LOS analysis. However, the City has adopted Measure U which includes the following policies:
 Maintain LOS C or better as the standard for all intersections presently at LOS C or better  Within the area identified in GP Figure 5-1, including that unincorporated County area identified on GP Figure 5-1 as the “donut hole”, maintain LOS C or better; however, accept a reduced LOS on a case by case basis upon approval by a four-fifths (4/5ths) vote of the total authorized membership of the City Council
 Exemptions from Traffic and Socio-Economic Study Requirements Only. Development projects that directly further the primary institutional purposes of churches, hospitals, schools (including private schools and universities), and organizations such as the YMCA and YWCA, on sites held by such entities as of March 1, 1997, are exempt from the traffic level of service requirements and the requirement for a socio-economic study established by this initiative measure so long as such development projects are either 1) non-residential in character, or 2) provide only dormitory, staff housing or senior congregate care facilities for those exempt entities.

As the Project proposes to construct hospital and supporting facilities, and has been owned by Kaiser since 1991, it has been determined that the Project is exempt from providing mitigation at local intersections through Measure U. However, the Project will be responsible for any improvements required at their Project driveways to ensure safe ingress and egress from the site.

The Project study intersections are listed below. In addition, the project driveways were also studied. Figure 2 shows the Project Study Area.

1. California Street and San Bernardino Avenue

2. California Street and Almond Avenue

3. California Street and Lugonia Avenue

4. California Street and Orange Tree Lane

5. California Street and I-10 Westbound Ramps

6. California Street and I-10 Eastbound Ramps

7. California Street and Redlands Boulevard

8. Mountain View Avenue and Almond Avenue

9. Mountain View Avenue and I-10 Westbound Ramps

10. Mountain View Avenue and I-10 Eastbound Ramps
No additional intersections were studied as part of this analysis. Although estimated traffic volumes assigned to the study intersections show that peak hour traffic volumes will be added to other nearby intersections, it is expected that volumes will only be added to major through movements, and will not degrade the overall intersection operations.

!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
1 2
3 5
6 4
7 9
10 8
"!10

ORANGE TR EE LN

ALMOND AVE

MOUNTAIN VIEW AVE

CALIFORNIA ST

REDLANDS BLVD

SAN BERNARDINO AVE

LUGONIA AVEMARIGOLD AVE
A
D E
C B
Study Area
Figure 2
! Study Intersections
Project Driveways
Project Site
Page | 14
Analysis Scenarios
LOS Intersection Analysis
Fehr & Peers studied peak hour intersection LOS at the previously identified study intersections for the following scenarios:
 Existing (2024) Baseline Conditions- Existing 2022 and 2024 traffic turning movement counts. 2022 counts were compared to 2024 volumes. No substantial difference in traffic volumes was observed, so no adjustments were made to 2022 counts.
 Existing (2024) Plus Project Conditions – Existing Without Project Conditions traffic volumes plus traffic generated by the Project Phases 1-4.

Page | 15

2. Significance Criteria and Analysis
Methodologies
The transportation study methodology includes a combination of quantitative and qualitative evaluations of the roadway, bicycle, pedestrian, and transit components of the transportation system.

VMT Analysis Methodology
According to the City’s VMT Analysis Guidelines, there are three types of screening that can be applied to effectively screen projects from project-level assessment.  Transit Priority Area (TPA Screening)
 Low VMT Area Screening
 Project Type Screening
Projects which are not eligible for any of the screening criteria are required to complete a VMT analysis using the San Bernardino County travel demand model to determine if they have a significant VMT impact.

The Project does not meet any criteria to be screened from a VMT Analysis, therefore a full VMT analysis was performed through the SBTAM+ model, in line with the City’s VMT Analysis Guidelines.

SBTAM+ was used to forecast intersection and roadway segment volumes, estimate existing and future VMT, and to perform an evacuation assessment. SBTAM+ is consistent with the 2024 Southern California Association of Governments Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCAG RTP/SCS); it has a base year of 2019 and a forecast year of 2050.

Since the existing land use within the site’s Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) does not accurately represent the employment of the full expansion, use of data from the existing TAZ was not appropriate for project analyses. Therefore, Fehr & Peers isolated the project into its own TAZ so that the project VMT could be estimated while accounting for socio-economic (SED) data that is consistent with the full buildout of the Kaiser expansion.

When calculating VMT for a project, the VMT methodology should match the methodology used to establish the Baseline VMT metrics and impact thresholds. For non-residential projects in the City of Redlands, Baseline VMT is defined as a measurement of Home-Based Work VMT per employee, which reflects all commute trips for places of employment within the San Bernardino County area. All HomeBased Work auto vehicle VMT attracted by the Project is divided by the total employment to get the efficiency metric of Home-Based Work VMT per employee. Following the VMT analysis, the Home-Based Page | 16
Work VMT per employee of the Project was then compared to the San Bernardino County Baseline VMT to determine if it exceeds the City’s impact threshold
Thresholds of Significance
The City’s VMT Analysis guidelines state the Project would result in a significant project-generated VMT impact if either of the following conditions are met:

1. The baseline project generated VMT per service population exceeds a level 15 percent below the San Bernardino County regional average VMT per service population, or

2. For projects that are inconsistent with the City’s General plan, the cumulative project generated VMT per service exceeds a level 15 percent below the San Bernardino County regional average VMT per service population.

Level of Service (LOS) Analysis Methodology
Fehr & Peers used the Synchro 11 software package to facilitate the HCM calculations.

Intersection operating conditions in the study area were evaluated using the Transportation Research Board (TRB) Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 7th Edition methodology, which is considered the state-ofthe-practice methodology for evaluating intersection operations.1 The HCM 7h Edition methodology for
signalized intersections estimates the average control delay for vehicles at the intersection. After the quantitative delay estimates are complete, the methodology assigns a qualitative letter grade that represents the operations of the intersection. These grades range from LOS A (minimal delay) to LOS F (excessive congestion). LOS E represents at-capacity operations. Descriptions of the LOS letter grades for signalized and unsignalized intersections are provided in Table 1.

Table 1: Intersection Level of Service (LOS) Grades
Level
of
Service
Description
Signalized
Delay
(Seconds)
Unsignalized
Delay
(Seconds)
A Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle length < 10.0 < 10.0
B Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths
> 10.0 to

20.0 > 10.0 to 15.0
C Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear > 20.0 to

35.0 > 15.0 to 25.0
D
Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable
> 35.0 to

55.0 > 25.0 to 35.0
1 Synchro 12 prepares delay estimates and reports referencing the HCM 7th Edition Methodology for isolated intersection analysis used in this study.

Page | 17
Level
of
Service
Description
Signalized
Delay
(Seconds)
Unsignalized
Delay
(Seconds)
E Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences > 55.0 to

80.0 > 35.0 to 50.0
F Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths > 80.0 > 50.0 Source: Highway Capacity Manual 7th Edition (Transportation Research Board, 2022).

Page | 18

3. Existing Conditions
This chapter describes transportation facilities in the Project study area, including the surrounding roadway network, transit, pedestrian, and bicycle facilities in the project site vicinity. Existing (2024) Project site conditions, traffic forecasts, and intersection operations are also described.

Existing Roadway Facilities
Regional access to the site is provided by Interstate 10 (I-10). Local access to the site is provided by California Street, Lugonia Avenue, Almond Avenue, and Mountain View Avenue. The section below discusses the roadways that would provide access to the site and are most likely to be affected by the proposed Project.

Regional Access Facilities
• Interstate 10 Freeway (I-10): I-10 is the main east-west facility through San Bernardino County. It extends the entire length of San Bernardino County, from its western border with Los Angeles County to its eastern border with Riverside County. I-10 is an eight- to ten-lane divided freeway near the Project and provides access to the Project at the Mountain View Avenue and California Street interchanges.
• SR-210: 210 provides regional north-south access in the Project vicinity. It is a six- to eight-lane divided freeway near the Project and provides access to the Project at the San Bernardino Avenue and Lugonia Avenue interchanges.

Local Access Roads
 California Street: California Street is a four-to-six lane north-south facility directly to the East of the Project site that provides access to I-10 and the areas south of the I-10.  Lugonia Avenue: Lugonia Avenue is a three- to four-lane east-west facility immediately South of the Project site.
 Almond Avenue: Almond Avenue is a four- to six-lane east-west facility directly North of the Project site.
 Mountain View Avenue: Mountain View Avenue is a four- to six-lane east-west facility to the South of the Project site that provides access to I-10 and the areas south of the I-10.

Bicycle Facilities
According to the Connected City chapter of General Plan 2035, the City’s existing bicycle network is comprised of over 36 miles of bicycle paths, made up of Class I, Class II, and Class III bicycle lanes. These facilities are described below.

Page | 19
Class I Bikeways (Bike Paths)
Class I bicycle facilities are completely separated facilities designed for the exclusive use of bicyclists and pedestrians.

Class II Bikeways (Bike Lanes)
Class II bicycle facilities are striped lanes that provide bike travel along a street or highway and can be either located next to a curb or parking lane.

Page | 20
Class III Bikeways (Bike Routes)
Class III Bikeways are routes designated by signs or pavement markings, like sharrows for bicyclists in a shared-use vehicular travel lane of a roadway. While bicyclists have no exclusive use or priority, signage by the side of the street and sometimes stenciled on the roadway surface alerts motorists to bicyclists sharing the roadway space and denotes that the street is an official bike route.

Class IV Bikeways (Cycle Tracks)
Class IV bicycle facilities, sometimes called cycle tracks or separated bikeways, are protected bike lanes that provide a right-of-way designated exclusively for bicycle travel within a roadway, protected from vehicular traffic by physical barriers (e.g., grade separation, flexible posts, inflexible physical barriers, onstreet parking). California Assembly Bill 1193 (AB 1193) legalized and established design standards for Class IV bikeways in 2015.

Page | 21
Currently, the nearest bicycle facility near the Project site is a Class I bicycle facility located on California Street north of San Bernardino Avenue. The Connected City chapter identifies proposed Multi-Use trails, one located at the Southeast corner of the Project site along California Street that would connect to the Orange Blossom Trail, an existing Class I Bicycle facility that is planned for improvements and completion to connect to more trails throughout the City.

Pedestrian Facilities
Within the study area, sidewalk facilities are provided along California Street, Lugonia Avenue, and sections of Almond Avenue. Sidewalks are not present along the section of Almond Avenue that is directly attached to the Project site.

At existing signalized intersections, adjacent to the Project, crosswalks and pedestrian push-button actuated signals are provided. Mid-block crosswalks and crosswalks at unsignalized intersections are not provided.

Existing Transit Service
Transit service in the area is offered by Metrolink and Omnitrans. The Project site is not adjacent to any existing public transit services. Detailed transit information is described below.

Metrolink
Commuter train service in the City of Redlands is provided by Metrolink, which operates six commuter rail lines throughout Southern California. Metrolink offers the Arrow train service, which provides passenger rail travel from Redlands to San Bernardino. Within the City, there are three Metrolink stations; the Redlands- Esri Station, Redlands- Downtown Station, and Redlands- University Station. The Arrow train service connects to the San Bernardino- Downtown Station which operates the San Bernardino Line, which links San Bernardino to Union Station in downtown Los Angeles.

Page | 22
Omnitrans
OmniTrans Transit Agency provides local transit service throughout San Bernardino County, including the City of Redlands. Bus transit services are available in the city through fixed-route and demand-response services. Bus routes that run through the city connect to the neighboring cities of San Bernardino, Colton, Highland, Mentone, Yucaipa, Fontana, Grand Terrace, Loma Linda, and Rialto.

The following transit routes operate within the study area:
 Route 8: Route 8 connects San Bernardino and Yucaipa via Loma Linda. This route operates every 60 minutes daily with Monday through Friday service between 5:00 AM and 10:30 PM, Saturdays between 7:00 AM and 7:30 PM, and Sundays between 7:30 AM and 7:00 PM. Route 8 runs along major City streets such as Orange Street and Lugonia Avenue.  Route 15: Route 15 serves Fontana and Redlands via Rialto and San Bernardino. This route operates every 60 minutes daily with Monday through Friday service between 4:00 AM and 10:30 PM, Saturdays between 5:30 AM and 7:30 PM, and Sundays between 5:30 AM and 7:30 PM. Route 15 runs along major City streets such as Orange Street, San Bernardino Avenue, Alabama Street, and Lugonia Avenue.
 Route 19: Route 19 serves Redlands and Fontana via Colton and Grand Terrace. This route operates with a frequency of 30 minutes and 60 minutes depending on the time of day during the weekdays and every 60 minutes on the weekends. Service during Monday through Friday occurs between 5:00 AM and 10:30 PM, on Saturdays between 5:00 AM and 10:00 PM, and on Sundays between 6:30 AM and 7:30 PM. Route 19 runs along City streets Brookside Avenue, Eureka Street, and Citrus Avenue.

No transit service is currently provided or planned for the roadways directly serving the project site.

Existing Year (2024) Traffic Volumes
Data Collection
Fehr & Peers collected peak hour (7:00 – 9:00 AM and 4:00 – 6:00 PM) multimodal traffic counts at intersections 1 through 6, under fair weather conditions, on Tuesday May 10th, 2022. Fehr & Peers collected traffic counts at intersections 7, 8, and 9 on Tuesday January 30th, 2024.

Existing (2024) Intersection Operations
The Existing (2024) volumes, shown in Figure 3, and existing lane configurations were used to evaluate operations at the study locations under peak hour conditions. Signal timing data was obtained from the appropriate jurisdictions for all signalized intersections.

The LOS results are summarized in Table 2 and detailed LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix C.

Page | 23
Table 2: Existing (2024) Intersection Level of Service
Intersection Jurisdiction Control Peak
Hour
Existing (2024)
Average Delay /
LOS

1. California Street and San
Bernardino Avenue City of Redlands Signalized
AM B / 18.8
PM B /17.6

2. California Street and Almond
Avenue City of Redlands Signalized
AM A / 8.9
PM A / 9.7

3. California Street and Lugonia
Avenue City of Redlands Signalized
AM B / 13.3
PM B / 12.7

4. California Street and Orange Tree
Lane
City of Redlands
Signalized
AM A / 7.2
PM B/ 11.5

5. California Street and I-10 WB
Ramps
City of Redlands
Signalized
AM B / 19.8
PM C / 22.1

6. California Street and I-10 EB
Ramps
City of Redlands
Signalized
AM C / 21.3
PM C / 21.4

7. California Street and Redlands
Boulevard
City of Redlands
Signalized
AM C / 21.7
PM C / 22.8

8. Mountain View Avenue and
Almond Avenue
City of Redlands
Signalized
AM A / 9.6
PM B / 10.7

9. Mountain View Avenue and I-10
WB Ramps
City of Redlands
Signalized
AM C / 22.0
PM D / 39.6

10. Mountain View Avenue and I-10
EB Ramps
City of Redlands
Signalized
AM C / 24.3
PM D / 48.2
Notes:

1. Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections.

Worst lane delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for side-street-stop-control intersections.

2. Delay operations were calculated using HCM 7th methodologies.

3. Bold represents a LOS deficiency.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.

Figure 3
Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations
Existing (2024) Conditions
166 (125)
100 (102)
29 (69) 26 (43) 212 (560) 112 (143)
18 (50)
83 (132)
7 (10) 5 (3) 302 (248)
79 (47)

1. California St/San Bernardino Ave
47 (39)
321 (270)
39 (50) 6 (18) 39 (120) 25 (55)
25 (19)
201 (298)
4 (10) 8 (11) 45 (65)
32 (40)

2. California St/Almond Ave
189 (72)
427 (325)
117 (154) 3 (9) 21 (63) 74 (164)
19 (8)
208 (443)
36 (55) 35 (39) 50 (37)
105 (152)

3. California St/Lugonia Ave
18 (10)
725 (495)
211 (108) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (1)
372 (727)
10 (21) 14 (33) 0 (0)
87 (264)

4. California St/Orange Tree Ln
298 (361)
594 (517)
293 (526)
184 (472) 360 (102) 7 (2)
320 (290)

5. California St/I-10 WB Ramps
458 (655)
276 (434) 407 (227) 2 (2) 458 (373)
483 (574)
71 (186)

6. California St/I-10 EB Ramps
137 (76)
424 (435)
49 (75) 110 (180) 240 (604) 203 (137)
137 (93)
412 (379)
213 (226) 154 (273) 318 (467)
66 (111)

7. California St/Redlands Blvd
11 (29)
346 (257)
77 (67) 10 (15) 52 (141) 40 (35)
12 (9)
228 (374)
44 (53) 61 (54) 82 (85)
54 (68)

8. Mountain View Ave/Almond Ave
San Bernardino Ave
California St
Lugonia Ave
California St
Orange Tree Ln
California St
I-10 WB Ramps
California St
I-10 EB Ramps
California St
Redlands Blvd
California St
Almond Ave
Mountain View Ave
369 (601)
386 (281)
200 (286)
309 (419) 230 (200) 9 (5)
460 (318)

9. Mountain View Ave/I-10 WB Ramps
I-10 WB Ramps
Mountain View Ave
529 (765)
302 (447) 248 (118) 2 (25) 832 (363)
627 (498)
149 (237)

10. Mountain View Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mountain View Ave
4 5
6 7
9 10
11 12
13 18
14 19
20 15 16
17 21
23 22
24 29
25 26
27 30
28 31
Almond Ave
California St
# Study Intersection
Lane Configuration
acf
AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volume
STOP Stop Sign
Signalized
LEGEND
acce ace
ace
acce
bf
aaccf
acce
d
bf
acf
accf
bcf
d
acce
accf
d
acc
cccf
bf
cccf
bf
acc
accf acef
ace
accf
ae
ace
ace
acf
abc
ce
adf
aef
ce
acc
Project DrivewaysProject Site
Page | 25

4. Project Characteristics
This chapter provides an overview of the proposed Project components and addresses the proposed Project’s trip generation, distribution, and assignment characteristics, allowing for an evaluation of the Project’s effect on the surrounding roadway network. The amount of traffic associated with the Project was estimated using a three-step process:

1. Trip Generation – The amount of vehicle traffic entering/exiting the project site was estimated.

2. Trip Distribution – The direction trips would use to approach and depart the site was projected.

Project Trip Generation
Trip generation refers to the process of estimating the amount of vehicular traffic a project would add to the surrounding roadway system. Estimates for the proposed Project were created for the daily condition and for the peak one-hour period during the morning (AM) and evening (PM) commute when traffic volumes on the adjacent streets are typically the highest.

The number of weekday morning and evening peak hour trips generated by the Project were estimated using methods published in Trip Generation, 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers [ITE], 2021).

A combination of Medical-Dental Office Building (ITE Code 720), Hospital (ITE Code 610), and Utility (ITE Code 170) trip generation rates were used to estimate daily and peak hour trips for the Project. Table 3 shows the trip generation rates for ITE Codes 720, 610, and 170.

Table 3: Trip Generation Rates
ITE Code Land Use Daily Rate
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
In Out Rate In Out Rate
720 Medical-Dental Office
Building 36.00 79% 21% 3.10 30% 70% 3.93
610 Hospital 22.32 72% 28% 1.79 33% 67% 1.69
170 Utility (Central Utility
Plant) 12.29 87% 13% 2.33 18% 82% 2.16
Source: Trip Generation Manual 11th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2021).

Trip generation is presented in Appendix A with the project scoping memorandum. The project is expected to generation 16,093 daily trips, 1,343 AM peak hour trips and 1,517 PM peak hours trips.

Page | 26
Project Trip Distribution
Trip distribution refers to the directions of approach and departure that vehicles use to travel to and from the Project site. Surrounding land uses, existing roadway network characteristics, local knowledge of the study area, and professional judgment were used to develop the trip distributions.

The trip distributions for the Project are shown in Figure 4.

Tennessee Street
SouthTippecanoeAvenue
Redlands Boulevard
California Street
East San Bernardino Avenue
Alabama Street
Mounta ni V ei wAvenue
Redlands Boulevard RedlandsBoulevard ColtonAvenue
SouthTippecanoe Avenue
Tennessee Street
San BernardinoAvenue
Redlands Boulevard
Anderson Street
Californai Street
West San BernardinoAvenue West San BernardinoAvenue
Citrus P al zaDr vi e
San BernardinoAvenue
West Lugonia Avenue
MissionRoad
California Street
Mounta ni V ei wAvenue
·
210
"!
10 !
Figure 4
Project Trip Distribution
West Lugonia Avenue West Lugonia Avenue
Almond Avenue Almond Avenue
Orange Tree Lane
4%
12%
8%
4%
4%
15%
2%
2%
8%
17%
12%
10%
2%
Legend
Project Site
Project Distribution
Figure 5
Project Trip Assignment
7 (23)
5 (17)
26 (84) 0 (0) 0 (0) 23 (10)
0 (0)
16 (7)
0 (0)0 (0) 0 (0)
82 (38)

1. California St/San Bernardino Ave
128 (112)
33 (107)
5 (17) 5 (17) 1 (4) 106 (130)
12 (6)
108 (50)
0 (0)0 (0) 4 (2)
16 (7)

2. California St/Almond Ave
155 (72)
500 (232)
0 (0) 8 (32) 3 (8) 29 (93)
27 (12)
173 (560)
10 (34) 33 (15) 8 (4)
0 (0)

3. California St/Lugonia Ave
0 (0)
614 (285)
0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (0)
189 (611)
13 (42) 41 (19) 0 (0)
0 (0)

4. California St/Orange Tree Ln
0 (0)
461 (214)
52 (164)
137 (447) 153 (71) 0 (0)
0 (0)

5. California St/I-10 WB Ramps
282 (131)
0 (0) 179 (83) 0 (0) 0 (0)
89 (290)
48 (157)

6. California St/I-10 EB Ramps
0 (0)
102 (47)
0 (0) 58 (27) 0 (0) 0 (0)
18 (59)
32 (105)
0 (0)122 (57) 0 (0)
0 (0)

7. California St/Redlands Blvd
0 (0)
0 (0)
78 (36) 0 (0) 82 (38) 0 (0)
0 (0)
0 (0)
22 (10) 7 (23) 26 (84)
31 (99)

9. Mountain View Ave/I-10 WB Ramps
I-10 WB Ramps
Mountain View Ave
26 (12)
58 (27) 52 (24) 0 (0) 0 (0)
27 (88)
0 (0)

10. Mountain View Ave/I-10 EB Ramps
I-10 EB Ramps
Mountain View Ave
422 (196)
118 (83)47 (153) 154 (500)
175 (81)
56 (106)
A. California St/Driveway A
10 (1)12 (7)
11 (42)
28 (126) 178 (79) 12 (9)
B. Driveway B/Lugonia Ave
10 (9)10 (1)
5 (4)
12 (7) 12 (9) 11 (42)
C. Driveway C/Lugonia Ave
6 (6)
6 (5)153 (62) 10 (13)
42 (154)10 (11)
D. Driveway D/Almond Ave
25 (93)
29 (110)83 (41) 76 (26)
27 (72)117 (47)
E. Driveway E/Almond Ave
Driveway A
California St
Lugonia Ave
Driveway C
Almond Ave
Driveway D
Almond Ave
Driveway E
4 5
6 7
9 10
11 12
13 18
14 19
20 15 16
17 21
23 22
24 29
25 26
27 30
28 31
Lugonia Ave
Driveway B
Almond Ave
California St
STOP

STOP P STO

STOP STOP
# Study Intersection
Project DrivewaysProject Site
Lane Configuration
acf
AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volume
STOP Stop Sign
Signalized
LEGEND
acce ace
ace
acce
bf
aaccf
acce
d
bf
acf
accf
bcf
d
acce
accf
d
acc
cccf
bf
cccf
bf
acc
accf acef
ace
accf
ae
ace
ace
acf
abc
ce
ade
aef
ce
acc
accc
af
cccf
ac
g
ce
b
g
ce
g
e
bc
g
e
bc
Page | 29

5. Vehicle Miles Traveled
Travel Demand Model
Consistent with the City’s VMT Analysis Guidelines, the latest version of the San Bernardino Transportation Analysis Model, SBTAM+, was utilized to estimate VMT in the study area. SBTAM+ is based off the SCAG regional travel demand model (which utilizes the 2024 SCAG RTP/SCS and forecasts traffic volumes on roadway segments for the entire six-county SCAG region). The SCAG model was refined to provide additional detail for San Bernardino County and was calibrated for use in San Bernardino County by ensuring that the model can replicate existing traffic volumes on County roadways after refinement. The SBTAM+ Base Year model is validated to 2019 with a Future Year model of 2050 and is considered the most appropriate tool for testing changes in land use and roadway network in San Bernardino County.

The Project was isolated into its own Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ). SBTAM+ land use inputs are referred to as Socioeconomic Data (SED). SED includes population demographics like numbers of residents, age of residents, vehicle ownership, and income, and employment categories like retail, manufacturing, public administration, and agriculture. The SED employment categories used in SBTAM+ are based on the employment descriptions documented in the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).

Since the existing land use within the site’s TAZ does not accurately represent the employment of the full expansion, use of data from the existing TAZ was not appropriate for project analyses. Therefore, Fehr & Peers isolated the project into its own TAZ so that the project VMT could be estimated while accounting for socio-economic (SED) data that is consistent with the full buildout of the Kaiser expansion.

Table 4 shows the SED that was utilized to represent the Project.

Table 4: Project SED Information
Project TAZ SED Health and Education Employment
Project TAZ (53836301) 1,321
Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.

Analysis Scenarios
As recommended in the City’s VMT Analysis guidelines, the VMT estimates were prepared under the following scenarios:
 Future Year (2050) No Project Conditions
 Future Year (2050) Plus Project Conditions
Page | 30
The No Project Conditions model runs were used to determine the project-generated thresholds of significance documented in the City’s VMT Analysis guidelines. The Plus Project Conditions model runs were used to determine VMT associated with the Project.

VMT Results
This section summarizes the results of the project-generated (PA method) VMT and project-effect on VMT (boundary method) modeling for the four study scenarios.

Project-Generated VMT
Project-generated VMT estimates were prepared using the Home-Based Work (HBW) method for the Base Year and Future Year Plus Project scenarios. HBW project-generated VMT estimates are presented in Table 5. For this analysis, HBW VMT represents VMT per employee (commute VMT). Under Base Year and future year scenarios the VMT per employee exceeds the City threshold.

Table 5: Project-Generated PA VMT Estimates
VMT Metrics for Non-Residential Projects Home-Based Work VMT per Employee
Project VMT Estimates (2050) 22.8
San Bernardino County Baseline VMT (2050) 23.8
Threshold: 15% Below San Bernardino County Baseline VMT 20.2 Percent Higher than VMT Threshold 12%
VMT Exceeds Threshold? Yes
Note: VMT per Employee = Commute (Attraction Home-Based-Work) VMT for Project.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024
Project-generated VMT estimates were prepared using the HBW method for the Base Year and Future Year Plus Project scenarios. HBW project-generated VMT estimates are presented in Table 5. For this analysis, HBW VMT represents VMT per employee (commute VMT). Under Base Year and future year scenarios the VMT per employee exceeds the City threshold.

Additional Data
In addition to the VMT analysis completed by Fehr & Peers using the SBTAM+ model, Kaiser has provided additional information to support how the expansion of the Kaiser facility in Redlands, California may still reduce the VMT of their employees and patients by showcasing how this new location would result in shorter trips compared to other Kaiser locations their employees and patients currently go to. Kaiser has provided the following additional information:
 Locations of other facilities currently used by Kaiser patients.  Locations of patients served by the current Kaiser facility in Redlands, California.

Page | 31
 Locations of employees and staff employed by this facility.

The data showed that for 164,156 Kaiser members, the distance to a facility in Redlands would be shorter than the current distance traveled to the Fontana Kaiser facility. For 69,788 members, the distance to Redlands would be an increase compared to the Fontana facility. For employees and physicians, the average miles traveled to the expanded Redlands Campus would be shorter than current distances traveled to Fontana and Ontario Kaiser facilities.

The data provided by Kaiser can be found within Appendix D.

Page | 32

6. Existing (2024) Plus Project
Conditions
Existing (2024) Intersection Operations
The lane configurations and traffic volumes presented on Figure 6 and existing signal timings were used to evaluate operations at the study intersections and Project Driveways under Existing (2024) Plus Project peak hour conditions. The results of each scenarios’ intersection operations are summarized in Table 6 and detailed LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix C.

Page | 33
Table 6: Existing (2024) Plus Project Intersection Level of Service Intersection Jurisdiction Control Peak Hour
Existing Year Plus
Project Conditions
Average Delay / LOS

1. California Street and
San Bernardino Avenue City of Redlands Signalized
AM C / 20.4
PM B / 19.0

2. California Street and
San Bernardino Avenue
City of Redlands Signalized
AM B / 10.2
PM B / 11.0

3. California Street and
Lugonia Avenue
City of Redlands Signalized
AM D / 40.1
PM B / 18.8

4. California Street and
Orange Tree Lane City of Redlands Signalized
AM A / 7.7
PM B / 15.3

5. California Street and I10 WB Ramps
City of Redlands Signalized
AM C / 23.6
PM D / 38.3

6. California Street and 1-
10 EB Ramps
City of Redlands Signalized
AM C / 26.2
PM C / 22.4

7. California Street and
Redlands Blvd City of Redlands Signalized
AM C / 25.1
PM C / 24.2

8. Mountain View Avenue
and Almond Avenue
City of Redlands Signalized
AM B / 11.4
PM B / 12.9

9. Mountain View Ave
and I-10 WB Ramps City of Redlands Signalized
AM C / 22.1
PM D / 39.1

10. Mountain View and I10 EB Ramps
City of Redlands Signalized
AM C / 28.0
PM D / 51.7

11. California St and
Driveway A
City of Redlands TWSC
AM F / >180
PM F / 153.1

12. Lugonia Ave and
Driveway B
City of Redlands TWSC
AM B / 12.7
PM B / 13.2

13. Lugonia Ave and
Driveway C
City of Redlands TWSC
AM B / 11.3
PM B / 10.7

14. Almond Ave and
Driveway D
City of Redlands TWSC
AM B / 10.7
PM B / 11.1

15. Almond Ave and
Driveway E
City of Redlands TWSC
AM B / 12.6
PM B / 14.2

1. Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections.

Worst lane delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for side-street-stop-control intersections.

2. Delay operations were calculated using HCM 7th methodologies.

Bold represents a LOS deficiency. Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.

Figure 6
Peak Hour Traffic Volumes and Lane Configurations
Existing (2024) Plus Project Conditions
173 (148)
105 (119)
55 (153) 26 (43) 212 (560) 135 (153)
18 (50)
99 (139)
7 (10) 5 (3) 302 (248)
161 (85)

1. California St/San Bernardino Ave
175 (151)
354 (377)
44 (67) 11 (35) 40 (124) 131 (185)
37 (25)
309 (348)
4 (10) 8 (11) 49 (67)
48 (47)

2. California St/Almond Ave
344 (144)
927 (557)
117 (154) 11 (41) 24 (71) 103 (257)
46 (20)
381 (1,003)
46 (89) 68 (54) 58 (41)
105 (152)

3. California St/Lugonia Ave
18 (10)
1,339 (780)
211 (108) 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
0 (1)
561 (1,338)
23 (63) 55 (52) 0 (0)
87 (264)

4. California St/Orange Tree Ln
298 (361)
1,055 (731)
345 (690)
321 (919) 513 (173) 7 (2)
320 (290)

5. California St/I-10 Westbound Ramps
740 (786)
276 (434) 586 (310) 2 (2) 458 (373)
572 (864)
119 (343)

6. California St/I-10 Eastbound Ramps
137 (76)
526 (482)
49 (75) 168 (207) 240 (604) 203 (137)
155 (152)
444 (484)
213 (226) 276 (330) 318 (467)
66 (111)

7. California St/Redlands Blvd
11 (29)
346 (257)
155 (103) 10 (15) 134 (179) 40 (35)
12 (9)
228 (374)
66 (63) 68 (77) 108 (169)
85 (167)

8. Mountain View Ave/Almond Ave
San Bernardino Ave
California St
Lugonia Ave
California St
Orange Tree Ln
California St
I-10 Westbound Ramps
California St
I-10 Eastbound Ramps
California St
Redlands Blvd
California St
Almond Ave
Mountain View Ave
369 (601)
464 (317)
222 (356)
318 (448) 230 (200) 9 (5)
478 (377)
I-10 Westbound Ramps
Mountain View Ave
555 (777)
360 (474) 300 (142) 2 (25) 832 (363)
654 (586)
149 (237)

9. Mountain View Ave/I-10 WB Ramps 10. Mountain View Ave/I-10 EB Ramps I-10 Eastbound Ramps
Mountain View Ave
422 (196)
584 (456)47 (153) 154 (500)
175 (81)
313 (499)
A. California St/Driveway A
10 (1)
110 (243)
11 (42)
28 (126) 178 (79) 270 (126)
B. Driveway B/Lugonia Ave
10 (9)
108 (237)
5 (4)
12 (7) 12 (9) 269 (159)
C. Driveway C/Lugonia Ave
6 (6)
6 (5)223 (255) 10 (13)
159 (278)10 (11)
D. Driveway D/Almond Ave
25 (93)
29 (110)153 (234) 76 (26)
144 (196)117 (47)
E. Driveway E/Almond Ave
Driveway A
California St
Lugonia Ave
Driveway C
Almond Ave Almond Ave
4 5
6 7
9 10
11 12
13 18
14 19
20 15 16
17 21
23 22
24 29
25 26
27 30
28 31
Lugonia Ave
Driveway B
Almond Ave
California St
STOP

P STO P STO

STOP STOP
# Study Intersection
Project DrivewaysProject Site
Lane Configuration
acf
AM (PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volume
STOP Stop Sign
Signalized
LEGEND
acce ace
ace
acce
bf
aaccf
acce
d
bf
acf
accf
bcf
d
acce
accf
d
acc
cccf
bf
cccf
bf
acc
accf acef
ace
accf
ae
ace
ace
acf
abc
ce
adf
aef
ce
acc
accc
af
cccf
ac
g
ce
b
g
ce
g
e
bc
g
e
bc
Page | 35

7. Site Access and Parking
Vehicle Access
Access to the Project will be provided by the two existing full access driveways located along California Street and Lugonia Avenue. The full buildout of the Project proposes three additional driveways, one on Lugonia Avenue (west of the existing Lugonia Avenue driveway) and two on Almond Avenue. All driveways will provide full access to the Project, but the two most west driveways on Almond Avenue and Lugonia Avenue will primarily service ambulances and delivery trucks.

As noted in Chapter 6, all Project driveways operate acceptably under Plus Project conditions and would facilitate acceptable ingress/egress to the site except for the driveway on California Street. Chapter 8 presented below presents recommend proposed improvements. As the driveway on California Street meets signal warrants and a signal would provide acceptable operations, new signalization of the driveway is recommended to facilitate vehicle access.

Emergency Vehicle Access
Several factors determine whether a project has sufficient access for emergency vehicles, including:

1. Number of access points (both public and emergency access only)

2. Width of access points

3. Width of internal roadways
The site plan provides five vehicle access points on Lugonia Avenue, Almond Avenue, and California Street. If one of these roadways was blocked obstructed, emergency vehicles would have an alternative route to access the site. Based on preliminary site plan information, project driveways and drive aisles provide a minimum of 24-feet clear travel area which is sufficient for emergency vehicle access and circulation.

Pedestrian, Bicycle, and Transit Access
There are insufficient details on the provided project site plan to fully evaluate pedestrian, bicycle and transit access and circulation to and within the site. It is expected that sidewalks would be constructed along the Almond Avenue project frontage where there are current sidewalk gaps. Sidewalks should be provided connecting building entrances to the public pedestrian system. There are no bike or transit facilities existing or planned on or adjacent to the Project site.

As noted, no transit service is currently provided or planned for the roadways directly serving the project site. However, if future transit service were provided Omnitrans has indicated bus service would most likely run along California Avenue. Any future potential bus stop would require a minimum area of 8’ by 5’ Page | 36
on the sidewalk, although a larger area of 10’ by 25’ would be preferred to allow for the installation of amenities such as a bus shelter. Final design of the project site and sidewalk on California Street should be done in coordination with the City of Redlands and Omnitrans staff and should take the requirements for bus stops into consideration.

Parking
The City of Redlands Parking Standards (Section EV4.0201) provide requirements for on-site parking in the City. These requirements are presented in Table 7.

Table 7: Required Parking
Use Parking Requirements
Hospitals
1 space/patient bed plus 1 space for every employee
and staff member on largest shift
Medical, dental offices
1 space/200 square feet of gross floor area; minimum
of 5 spaces per office
The project is being built out over four phases. The parking required for each phase is noted below.

Existing
 120,000 sf Medical Office Building: 600 spaces required Phase One
 165,000 sf Medical Office Building: 825 spaces required Phase Two
 400,000 square feet of Hospital comprising of 213 beds: 213 spaces required for patients, see below for employees
 35,000 square foot Central Utility Plant (shown as CUP in the site plan): no parking required Phase Three
 83,000 square feet of Medical Office Building: 415 spaces required Phase Four
 180,000 square foot expansion to the Phase Two Hospital comprising of an additional 108 beds:
108 spaces required for patients, see below for employees Data provided by Kaiser indicates that a total of 1,321 employees are expected to be on-site daily. It is expected that 550 employees would be part of the largest shift of the hospital. Therefore, the combined Page | 37
parking required by the existing MOB and buildout of all four phases, including an estimated 550 spaces for hospital employees under the largest shift, would be a combined 2,711 spaces.

The project proposes to include a total of 2,803 spaces. As the proposed parking supply is expected to exceed the required parking, sufficient parking is planned for the site.

Page | 38

8. Mitigation and Improvements
VMT Mitigation
Fehr & Peers reviewed potential mitigation strategies that can be adopted for this project, recognizing that the most effective strategies will target Project employees and commute VMT. Quantification of VMT mitigation measures is based on the methods described in the Handbook for Analyzing Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions, Assessing Climate Vulnerabilities, and Advancing Health and Equity published by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. Adjustments were made based on Project site context and Project features. Measures were analyzed together, and a multiplicative dampening reduction was applied to mitigation measures that address the same trip types.

Table 8 describes the mitigation measures that can be incorporated into the Project and the maximum VMT reduction available to this Project.

Table 8: VMT Mitigation Measures
Strategy Description
Maximum VMT
Reduction
Implement Commute Trip
Reduction Marketing
This measure will implement a marketing strategy to
promote the project site employer’s commute trip
reduction program. Information sharing and
marketing promote and educate employees about
their travel choices to the employment location
beyond driving such as carpooling, taking transit,
walking, and biking, thereby reducing VMT and GHG
emissions.
4% of HBW VMT
Provide Employee
Rideshare Program
This measure will implement a ridesharing program
for employees with similar commutes with funding
requirements for employers. Ridesharing encourages
carpooled vehicle trips in place of single-occupied
vehicle trips, thereby reducing the number of trips,
VMT, and GHG emissions. Existing programs including
IE Commuter can be leveraged for this measure.
4% of HBW VMT
Page | 39
Strategy Description
Maximum VMT
Reduction
Provide End-of-Trip Bicycle
Facilities
This measure will install and maintain end-of-trip
facilities for employee use. End-of-trip facilities
include bike parking, bike lockers, showers, and
personal lockers. The provision and maintenance of
secure bike parking and related facilities encourages
commuting by bicycle, thereby reducing VMT and
GHG emissions.

0.3% of HBW VMT
Provide EmployerSponsored Vanpool
This measure will implement an employer-sponsored
vanpool service. Vanpooling is a flexible form of
public transportation that provides groups of 5 to 15
people with a cost-effective and convenient rideshare
option for commuting. The mode shift from longdistance, single-occupied vehicles to shared vehicles reduces overall commute VMT, thereby reducing GHG
emissions. It was assumed that up to 2% of
employees would participate in the vanpool program.

1.6% of HBW VMT
Multiplicative Dampening
Adjustment to overall VMT reduction as measures
overlap and target the same type of trips.
-0.6%
TOTAL: 9.9% of HBW VMT
Source: California Air Pollution Control Officers Association, 2021. Fehr & Peers, 2024.

Implementation of these measures will be detailed and monitored in the Project’s Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP). The developer shall coordinate implementation of these measures and can leverage existing regional programs that provide employer services for commute trip reduction programs.

Additional mitigation measures exist to address VMT impacts, however the other options available were either deemed inappropriate or infeasible for this project. These include measures such as increasing the density of the project, which would be incompatible with the project description, or measures such as implementing a subsidized transit program, which is not appropriate with no nearby transit service provided. Other mitigation strategies like a school bus program or unbundling residential parking do not apply to this type of project. Furthermore, paying into a regional fee program or VMT bank could fund mitigation measures not applicable to this project type and location, but as this type of regional program does not currently exist, this was also deemed infeasible.

As noted above, Project HBW VMT is projected to be 12% higher than the City’s VMT threshold.

Therefore, even with the mitigation described the maximum VMT mitigation would not fully mitigate the Project’s VMT impact.

Page | 40
LOS Improvements
This section summarizes proposed improvements for Existing Year (2024) Plus Project Conditions.

Improvements were proposed at a study location if it is forecast to operate below the previous LOS standard (if the LOS Standard declined under LOS C) during either the AM or PM peak hour.

Existing Year (2024) Plus Project Intersection Improvements As seen Chapter 6, under Existing (2024) Plus Project conditions, three study locations operate below the City of Redland’s acceptable LOS standard. Consistent with the City’s guidelines, improvements were recommended that improved operations to acceptable conditions (below LOS C must remain the same or improve if decreased). Detailed LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix C.

The following improvements address deficiencies identified in the Existing Plus Project conditions analysis, which represents the build out of all four phases of the expansion. Improvements to intersections 3, 5, and 10 should be completed before the construction of Phase 4 of the expansion. The new traffic signal at Driveway A should be completed before the construction of Phase 2 of the expansion. As documented in Appendix E, the intersection meets peak hour signal warrants with Phase 2 of the expansion.

Intersection 3: California Street and Lugonia Avenue
This intersection is forecasted to operate at LOS D during the AM Peak Hour with Plus Project conditions.

The Project adds 26.7 seconds of average delay to the intersection.

The following improvements are recommended:
 The signal timing is uncoordinated so the AM signal timing should be optimized.

With improvements, the intersection is forecasted to operate at LOS C in the AM peak hour.

Intersection 5: California Street and I-10 WB Ramps
This intersection is forecasted to operate at LOS C during the PM Peak Hour with Plus Project conditions.

The Project adds 16.2 seconds of average delay to the intersection.

The following improvements are recommended:
 Optimize PM signal timing. The signal timing already operates coordinated so the split phases are advised to be optimized.

With improvements, the intersection is forecasted to operate at LOS C in the PM peak hour.

Intersection 10: Mountain View Avenue and I-10 EB Ramps This intersection is forecasted to still operate at LOS D during the PM Peak Hour with Plus Project conditions. The Project adds 3.5 seconds of average delay to the intersection.

Page | 41
The following improvements are recommended:
 Optimize PM signal timing. The signal timing already operates coordinated so the split phases are advised to be optimized.

With improvements, the intersection is forecasted to operate at LOS B in the PM peak hour.

Driveway A: California Street and Driveway A
This Project driveway is forecasted to operate at LOS F during both AM and PM Peak hour with Plus Project Conditions. As a result, a signal warrant analysis was completed to determine if the driveway and intersection would benefit from the addition of a traffic signal. The driveway and intersection meets the signal warrant requirements. The Signal Warrant can be found in Appendix E.

With improvements, the intersection is forecasted to operate at LOS A in the AM peak hour and LOS B in the PM peak hour.

Intersection LOS Comparison
Table 9 compares delay and LOS for Existing (2024) Plus Project with and without the proposed improvements described above.

Table 9: Existing Year (2024) Plus Project Intersection LOS with Improvements Intersection Control
Peak
Hour
Existing Plus Project
LOS / Average Delay
Existing Plus Project
with Improvements
LOS / Average Delay

3. California Street and Lugonia
Avenue
Signalized
AM D / 40.0 C / 30.7
PM B / 18.8 B /18.8

5. California Street and I-10 WB
Ramps
Signalized
AM C / 23.6 C / 23.6
PM D / 38.3 C / 29.9

10. Mountain View Avenue and
I-10 EB Ramps
Signalized
AM C / 28.0 C / 28.0
PM D / 51.7 B /18.4

11. California Street and
Driveway A
TWSC/
Signalized
AM F / >180 A / 7.5
PM F / 153.1 B / 16.0
Notes:

1. Whole intersection weighted average stopped delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for signalized intersections.

Worst lane delay expressed in seconds per vehicle for side-street-stop-control intersections.

2. Delay operations were calculated using HCM 7th methodologies.

3. Bold represents a LOS deficiency.

Source: Fehr & Peers, 2024.

Page | 42
Appendix A: Scoping Memorandum
3750 University Avenue | Suite 225 | Riverside, CA 92501 | (951) 274-4800 | Fax (951) 684-4324 www.fehrandpeers.com
Memorandum
Date: August 16, 2024
To: City of Redlands Planning Division
35 El Cajon Street, Suite 15A
Redlands, CA 92373
From: Delia Votcsch, P.E.

Subject: Kaiser Permanente Redlands Medical Office/Ambulatory Surgery Center Traffic Study Scoping Assessment
OC22-0875
Fehr & Peers is conducting a traffic study in support of the proposed 948,000 square foot multi-phased expansion of the Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) Redlands Medical Center (Project) in Redlands, California. This memorandum proposes the scoping information and parameters for the traffic study per the requirements set in the City of Redlands CEQA Assessment VMT Analysis Guidelines (2020) and the City of Redlands Measure U Growth Management Initiative.

This memo was previously submitted and has been revised per the comments provided by the City of Redlands on October 7, 2022 and subsequent communication with City staff since 2022.

The remainder of this memorandum is divided into the following sections: Project Description, VMT Screening Assessment, and Level of Service (LOS) Traffic Study.

Project Description
The Project is located on the northwest corner of the California Street and Lugonia Avenue bounded by California Street to the east, an existing Ashley Furniture HomeStore to the west, Almond Avenue to the north, and Lugonia Avenue to the south. The Project site is shown in Attachment 1 and is currently partially developed by a 120,000 square foot Kaiser Medical Office Building (MOB). The exiting development is shown as MOB1 in the site plan.

The expansion consists of various medical facilities/land uses and is proposed to occur in four phases. The Project will be analyzed by phase to determine which transportation improvements will be recommended at each phase of the Project.

City of Redlands
August 16, 2024

Page 2 of 8 ends

Redlands City CouncilApril 7, 2026

Redlands City Council
April 7, 2026