school aged youth. Many jurisdictions in California and across the U.S. are grappling with how to integrate them into existing traffic systems while maintaining safety. Statewide data suggests a clear and upward trend in e-conveyance-related incidents:
• According to UC San Francisco researchers, e-bicycle injuries doubled every year between 2017 and 2022, reflecting a steep rise in risk exposure. • Over that same period, e-bike riders presenting with head trauma increased nearly 49- fold (despite modest declines in helmet usage).
• In California, the number of reported accidents involving e-bikes rose from 184 in 2018 to 3,429 in 2023, a nearly 18-fold increase in five years. • Between 2018 and 2022, there were an estimated 104 fatalities nationwide linked toebike crashes.
Under the California Vehicle Code, e-bikes are subject to certain classifications (Class 1, 2, 3) and operational rules (e.g., speed limits, helmet requirements for minors). However, many operational behaviors such as reckless riding, sidewalk use, trail speeding, equipment safety, and age restrictions beyond state minimums should be addressed at the local level. Several California cities have already adopted or proposed local econveyance ordinances (e.g. Santa Barbara; Laguna Beach; Lathrop) to fill these gaps.
In conjunction with the implementation of this proposed ordinance, the City will enact a speed limit of 15 miles per hour along the Rail to Trail, in its entirety. Safety concerns for pedestrians, bicyclists and e-conveyance operators sharing the trail space suggest the implementation of a speed limit. The City has the authority to enact speed limits on public trails and spaces to reduce safety concerns.
KEY AREAS AND PROVISIONS
Below is a summary of recommended components for the ordinance.
Topic Suggested Provision
Define "e-conveyance," "e-bike (Class
Definitions 1/2/3)," "motorized scooter," "operator,"
"unsafe operation," etc.
Potentially prohibit operation of certain
Age restrictions classes (e.g. throttle-equipped Class 2) by riders under a specified age (e.g. 16)
Rationale / Notes
Clear definitions avoid
ambiguity and aid
enforcement.
Youth are disproportionately
represented in injury data.
Helmet
requirement
Bridges gap between state law
Require minor operators of e-conveyances and stricter local safety to wear properly secured helmets standards.
Cap speeds on bike paths, sidewalks,
Speed limits & multiuse trails to 15 mph, and prohibit
zones operation above certain speeds in
designated areas
Sidewalk access Prohibit operation of e-conveyances on
prohibition public sidewalks
Helps protect pedestrians and
reduce high-speed collisions.
Pedestrian safety concern;
many collisions occur due to
Topic Suggested Provision Rationale / Notes
sidewalk riding.
Right-of-way & Explicit rules for yielding to pedestrians, Reinforces safe interaction yielding signals, passing, safe distances among users.
Lighting & Require front and rear lights, reflectors, Ensures visibility and safe equipment brakes, operation in low light.
Authorize law enforcement to impound e- Provides enforcement teeth; lmpoundment / conveyances used dangerously or by progressive consequences for confiscation minors; release upon conditions (e.g. repeat offenders parental retrieval, education) Fines & Establish administrative fines, warnings, Enables proportional penalties and progressive penalties enforcement.
This ordinance is necessary to try to reduce the number and severity of collisions by curbing unsafe behaviors, controlling speeds, and improving rider awareness. Particularly vulnerable populations such as pedestrians, children and the elderly may benefit from stricter restrictions on sidewalk or trail riding, and speed control. Education and infrastructure support like signage, signage enforcement and increasing bike lanes will amplify safety benefits designed in this ordinance.
If approved, the roll out of this ordinance will establish a 30-day education period prior to enforcement for stakeholders. During this education period, the Police Department will generate education materials including rules, regulations, safety tips, and new signage recognition. The education will be administered through social media, local media, and educational information for schools to provide to their students.
FISCAL IMPACT
Infrastructure signage will incur one-time cost for production and installation along the Rail to Trail. The signage will enact a 15-mph speed limit across the length of the Trail.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Ordinance No. 2025-005, An Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Reedley adding Chapter 5 of Title 6 of the Reedley Municipal Code concerning the use of EConveyances.
ORDINANCE NO. 2025-005
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY ADDING CHAPTER 5 TO TITLE 6 OF THE REEDLEY MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING THE
USE OF ELECTRIC BICYCLES AND MOTORIZED SCOOTERS WITHIN CITY LIMITS BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of Reedley as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 5 of Title 6 of the Reedley Municipal Code is added to read as follows:
Sections:
6-5-1: Purpose and Intent
6-5-2: Definitions
6-5-3: Operation of E-Conveyances
6-5-4: E-Conveyance Sales/Rentals
6-5-5: Enforcement
6-5-6: Exemptions
6-5-1: Purpose and Intent
Chapter 5
E-CONVEYANCES
A. The purpose of this chapter is to regulate £-Conveyances within the city limits of Reedley.
B. The City supports the usage of Electric Bicycles, Electric Scooters, and other £-Conveyances as an alternative mode of transportation. The City also recognizes the increased usage has created safety concerns among operator interactions with other motorists and pedestrians, warranting a higher level of regulation.
6-5-2: Definitions
A. £-CONVEYANCE: any electric bicycle, electric scooter, e\ectric skateboard, or other device propelled by an electric motor, and designed to convey one (1) or more people.
B. ELECTRIC BICYCLE: an electric bicycle, or "e-bike", which is a bicycle equipped with fully operable pedals and an electric motor of 750 watts or less, and is categorized by the following:
Class I - an electric bicycle equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling, and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches a speed of 20 miles per hour.
Class 2 - an electric bicycle equipped with a motor that may be used exclusively to propel the bicycle, and that is not capable of providing assistance when the bicycle reaches a speed of 20 miles per hour.
1 Class 3 - an electric bicycle equipped with a motor that provides assistance only when the rider is pedaling, and that ceases to provide assistance when the bicycle reaches a speed of 28 miles per hour and is equipped with a speedometer.
C. ELECTRIC SCOOTER or £-SCOOTER: a two or three-wheeled device that has handlebars, has a floorboard that is designed to be stood upon when riding, and is powered by an electric motor. This device may also have a driver seat that does not interfere with the ability of the rider to stand and ride and may also be designed to be powered by human propulsion.
D. ELECTRIC SKATEBOARD or £-SKATEBOARD: a four-wheeled device that has a floorboard that is designed to be stood upon when riding, and is powered by an electric motor. 6-5-3: Operation of E-Conveyances
A. Prohibition of £-Conveyances Where Posted.
No person shall operate or ride on an £-Conveyance in public areas where bicycles are prohibited, as set forth in Sections 6-3-2 of this Code.
B. No Operating or Riding £-Conveyances on Sidewalks and Public Facilities.
No person shall operate or ride an £-Conveyance upon any sidewalk, in any public drainage facility, culvert, ditch, channel, or any other public athletic field, athletic/sports court, or gymnasium in the city, except for persons with mobility disabilities utilizing a wheelchair or other power-driven mobility device in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act ( 42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et seq.) and Section 36.311 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
C. Riders must be 16 years or older to ride a Class 2 Electric Bicycle or Class 3 Electric Bicycle.
D. Parking of £-Conveyances.
No person shall leave an £-Conveyance lying on its side on any sidewalk, nor shall park an £-Conveyance upon the public right-of-way or the sidewalk rack to support the £- Conveyance or against a building or at a curb, except in such a manner as to afford the least obstruction to pedestrian traffic.
E. Duty to Operate £-Conveyances With Due Care and Speed.
1. The operator of an £-Conveyance shall exercise all due care and shall reduce the speed of the device, obey all traffic control devices, and take all other actions relating to the operation of the device as necessary to safeguard the safety of the operator, passengers, and any persons or other vehicles or devices in the immediate area. 2 a. Any person operating an £-Conveyance upon a roadway at a speed less than the normal speed of traffic moving in the same direction at such time shall ride as close as practicable to the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway, except under any of the following situations:
1. When overtaking and passing another £-Conveyance, bicycle or vehicle proceeding in the same direction.
11. When preparing for a left tum at an intersection or into a private road or driveway.
111. When reasonably necessary to avoid conditions (including, but not limited to, fixed or moving objects, vehicles, bicycles, pedestrians, animals, surface hazards, or substandard width lanes) that make it unsafe to continue along the right-hand curb or edge. "Substandard width lane" is a lane that is too narrow for an £-Conveyance and a vehicle to travel safely side-by-side within the lane.
2. Any person operating an £-Conveyance upon a roadway or a highway, which highway carries traffic in one direction only and has two or more marked traffic lanes, may ride as near the left-hand curb or edge of such roadway as practicable.
3. Persons riding an £-Conveyance upon a roadway or bike lane shall not ride more than two abreast.
4. No person shall operate an £-Conveyance at a speed greater than is reasonable and prudent under the conditions than existing, and in no event at a speed which endangers the safety of persons or property. No £-Conveyance operator shall travel over 28 miles per hour on a public roadway. No £-conveyance operator shall travel over 15 miles per hour on any trail, designated path, park, or other public property within the City.
5. No person shall operate an £-Conveyance in an unsafe manner. An unsafe manner means in a manner that constitutes a danger to the operator, a passenger, other motorists, other riders, pedestrians, or property. Examples of riding in an unsafe manner may include, but are not limited to:
a. Not yielding to vehicles or pedestrians when required. b. Operating an e-conveyance in a manner it was not designed for, including carrying passengers when not designed for carrying passengers. c. Engaging in racing or speed contests.
d. Carrying any package, bundle, item or article which prohibits the operator from having full control and forward visibility at all times. e. Performing any acrobatics, tricks, wheelies, or stunts when pedestrians or moving vehicles are in close proximity.
3 6. A person under the age of 18 must wear a properly fitted and fastened bicycle helmet when riding an E-Conveyance on a public roadway, bikeway, bicycle path, bicycle trail, or bicycle route regardless of E-bike class.
7. All persons operating or riding as a passenger upon a Class 3 electric bicycle shall comply with Section 21213 of the California Vehicle Code regarding the wearing of a properly fitted and fastened bicycle helmet.
8. No person shall operate an E-Conveyance after sunset without a front facing white light.
All E-Conveyances shall have reflectors on both wheels and on the rear of the EConveyance.
9. It shall be unlawful to transport a passenger on an E-Conveyance designed for a single person, or cling to or attach oneself to an E-Conveyance with an operator or rider on board, to any moving vehicle or motorized or non-motorized wheeled device.
10. Operators must obey all applicable California Vehicle Code requirements.
11. Operators shall allow the inspection of E-Conveyances upon lawful contact with police officers to determine if the rider is legally allowed to operate said E-Conveyance. 6-5-4: E-Conveyance Sales/Rentals
Businesses within the City of Reedley that sell, rent, or service E-Conveyances shall provide safety information and the legal use of such devices within the State of California and the City of Reedley.
This information shall be provided at the time of sale, time of rental, or upon request of an individual. 6-5-5: Enforcement
A. A violation of any section in this chapter or any of the instructions or prohibitions contained in any signage posted pursuant to this section, shall be guilty of an infraction. This chapter does not prohibit any officer from issuing a citation to the Courts for any offense based on his or her discretion. In the event an observed violation is not already codified in the California Vehicle Code and falls under the scope of this chapter, an administrative citation may be issued pursuant to title 1, chapter 12 of this Code. The amount of any fines levied for violations of this chapter shall comply with section 1-12-8 of this Code.
1. After the first 30 days following adoption of this chapter, a violation of any section in this chapter shall be punishable by a fine established in the Administrative Citation Chapter; 1-12-8.
2. A fee shall not be imposed upon a citation of this infraction if the person who violated the requirement, or, if that person is an unemancipated minor, their parent or guardian, delivers proof to the issuing agency within 120 days after the citation was issued that the person has a helmet meeting the requirements specified in California Vehicle Code section 21212( a) and the person has completed a safety course established pursuant to California Streets and Highways Code section 894, or an electrical bicycle safety course offered by any local jurisdiction, if one is available. 4 3. No record of any violation of the regulations specified in section 10.30.070 of this chapter shall be transmitted to any Superior Court of the State of California.
B. An E-Conveyance shall meet the following criteria
1. Comply with the equipment and manufacturing requirements for bicycles adopted by the United States Consumer Product Safety Commission (16 C.F.R. 1512.1 , et seq.).
2. Operate in a manner so that the electric motor is disengaged or ceases to function when the brakes are applied, or operate in a manner such that the motor is engaged through a switch or mechanism that, when released or activated, will cause the electric motor to disengage or cease to function.
3. A person shall not tamper with or modify an E-Conveyance to change the speed capability of the device, unless he or she appropriately replaces the label indicating the classification. It shall be unlawful to operate an E-Conveyance which has been modified to exceed 28 miles per hour upon any public roadway.
C. In lieu of a fine or administrative citation as authorized by this Code, and in lieu of filing charges in any court having jurisdiction over a violation, the police chief or designee may allow a violator and parents of the violator of this chapter to complete a police department diversion safety program, at their expense, as assigned by the police department designee.
D. This chapter does not prohibit any officer from issuing a citation to the courts for any offense based on his or her discretion. In the event an observed violation is not already codified in the California Vehicle Code and falls under the scope of this chapter, an administrative citation may be issued pursuant to title 1, chapter 12 of this Code. The amount of any fines levied for violations of this chapter shall comply with Section 1-12-8 of this Code.
E. In the event the operator of the E-Conveyance is a juvenile, officers will make every effort to contact the parent(s) or responsible guardian(s) of the said operator and advise them of the nature of the violation. This shall occur at the time of the stop or as soon as practical. 6-5-6: Impoundment
A. The chief of police or their designee may impound and retain possession of any econveyance operated in violation of any of the provisions of this chapter or the California Vehicle Code. The impoundment period shall not exceed 30 days. If the rider in violation of this chapter is a minor, the e-conveyance conveyance shall be released to the minor's parent, guardian, or other responsible adult upon payment of the impound fee B. The fee for release of an e-conveyance from impoundment under this chapter shall be set at $100. The on-duty Police Department Supervisor shall be responsible for determining the length of impoundment and the subsequent release.
6-5-7: Exemptions
5 A. Public Agency Personnel. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter or any other section of this Code, City and public agency personnel may operate £-Conveyance s or other vehicles at any place in the City to perform their duties.
B. Disability. This chapter does not apply to or otherwise restrict persons with mobility disabilities utilizing a wheelchair or other power-driven mobility device in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (42 U.S.C. Section 12101 et seq.) and Section 36.311 of Title 28 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
SECTION 2. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, provision, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, sentence, clause, provision, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional without regard to whether any portion of the Ordinance would be subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
SECTION 3. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption.
SECTION 4. The City Clerk is directed to cause this ordinance or a summary of this Ordinance to be published once in a newspaper of general circulation published and circulated within the City of Reedley, within fifteen (15) days after its adoption. If a summary of the Ordinance is published, the City Clerk shall cause a certified copy of the full text of the proposed Ordinance to be posted in the office of the City Clerk at least five (5) days prior to the Council meeting at which the Ordinance is adopted and again after the meeting at which the Ordinance is adopted. The summary shall be approved by the City Attorney.
ATTEST:
The foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Reedley on the_ day of ____ , 2025 and passed, adopted, and approved by the City Council of the City of Reedley on this_ day of ___ , 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST:
Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
City of Reedley
Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
City of Reedley
19 10\06\POL\49 19-3588-7208 v.2. docx
6 DATE:
TITLE:
October 28, 2025
REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent Calendar
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
~ Public Hearing
ITEM NO: \4 ----
HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2025-077 - A
RESOLUTION TO CONFIRM THE AMOUNT OF UNPAID NUISANCE
ABATEMENT COSTS TO BE RECORDED AS A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
SUBMITTED: Rodney Horton, Community Development Director ~ APPROVED: Nicole Zieba, City Manager ~
RECOMMENDATIONS
Staff recommends that the City Council of the City of Reedley ("City") hold a public hearing and adopt Resolution No. 2025-077 - a resolution confirming the amount of a special assessment to be recorded for unpaid nuisance abatement costs related to 1451 9th Street, Reedley, CA 93654 ("Property") in the amount of Thirty-One Thousand Ninety-Three Dollars and Seventeen Cents ($31,093.17).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On or about July 13, 2022, a fire at the Property was fueled due to overgrown vegetation and debris. Code Enforcement met with the Property owners regarding their efforts to clear out the burnt property. The Property was uninhabitable due to fire damage. City code enforcement ("Code Enforcement") also noted trash and debris through the front yard and dry, overgrown vegetation . The Property owners informed Code Enforcement that the Property did not have homeowners' insurance, and the owners were personally cleaning up and paying for repairs to the Property.
After receiving complaints from multiple parties, Code Enforcement returned to the Property on November 30, 2023, reinspecting and finding the Property dilapidated, uninhabitable, and structurally unsound. The Property lacked adequate fencing to secure it from vagrants and still contained junk and debris. Code Enforcement filed a report of their findings. Municipal Code violations included violations to Municipal Code Title 4, section 4-2-3 Health and Sanitation; Title 9, section 9-4-4 Real Property Maintenance Standards and Unlawful Conditions; and Title 9, section 9-4-5 Standards for Vacant Real Property.
On January 1, 2024, Code Enforcement issued a final notice of violation to the Property owners when, after an inspection, the Property remained unchanged from the November 30, 2023, inspection.
On February 21, 2025, Code Enforcement again reinspected the Property, and when the inspection revealed there was no change from subsequent inspections, Code Enforcement issued a Notice and Order to Demolish and Abate Public Nuisance to the owners of the Property, citing violations of Municipal Code sections 4-2-3, 9-4-4, and 9-4-5. This Notice provided the Property owners thirty (30) days to abate the nuisance conditions on the Property.
The owners made no attempt to abate any of the nuisance conditions. Code Enforcement reinspected the property weekly and found the Property became a site for illegal dumping.
On June 6, 2025, the City filed in California Superior Court in Fresno County for and received an "Abatement Warrant and Order Authorizing Entry onto the Proposed Property to Abate Public Nuisance." This order authorized Code Enforcement to enter the Property, demolish the dwelling, remove all trash, debris, and abandoned material, and secure the premises with fencing and a no trespassing sign.
The City now seeks to recover nuisance abatement costs amounting to Thirty-One Thousand Ninety-Three Dollars and Seventeen Cents ($31,093.17). This resolution confirms a special assessment to be recorded for unpaid nuisance abatement costs against the Property.
Special Assessment
Pursuant to Reedley Municipal Code section 4-2-13, the City may impose a special assessment against real property that is the subject of unpaid nuisance abatement costs. The City may assess late fees and administrative charges in addition to the citations, including recording fees charged. It is anticipated that the cost of recording an assessment lien is Thirty-One Thousand Ninety-Three Dollars and Seventeen Cents ($31,093.17.)
To authorize the special assessment, the City Council must confirm the amount of the assessment at a regularly scheduled or special meeting. Following confirmation of the assessment amount, a special assessment will be recorded for placement on the Property for inclusion in the 2026-27 tax roll. On October 1, 2025, the City mailed a notice about the upcoming Public Hearing to the Property owner, pursuant to Reedley Municipal Code Sections 1-12-9 and 1-12-6.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution 2025-077 Confirming the amount of a special assessment to be recorded for unpaid nuisance abatement costs related to 1451 Ninth Street, Reedley, CA 93654 in the amount of Thirty-One Thousand Ninety-Three Dollars and Seventeen Cents ($31,093.17).
2. Notice to Property owner of hearing
3. August 5, 2025, Invoice
RESOLUTION NO. 2025-077
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY
CONFIRMING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR UNPAID NUISANCE ABATEMENT COSTS FOR 1451 NINTH STREET, REEDLEY, CALIFORNIA 93654
WHEREAS, on or about July 13, 2022, a fire at the property located at 1451 Ninth Street, Reedley, California 93645 ("Property") was fueled by overgrown vegetation and debris; and
WHEREAS, the Property was uninhabitable due to fire damage and the Property contained trash, debris, and dry and overgrown vegetation; and WHEREAS, on or about July 12, 2023 , City of Reedley Code Enforcement ("Code Enforcement") met with the Property owners, Joseph and Jerrod Pefia, regarding their efforts to clear the Property; and
WHEREAS, after receiving numerous complaints, Code Enforcement returned to the property on November 30, 2023, and after reinspecting, found the Property to be dilapidated, uninhabitable, and structurally unsound. The Property also lacked adequate fencing to secure it from vagrants and still contained trash and debris; and WHEREAS, on January 1, 2024, Code Enforcement issued a final notice of violation to the Property owners.; and
WHEREAS, on February 21 , 2025, Code Enforcement issued a "Notice and Order to Demolish and Abate Public Nuisance" to the Property owners. The Property owners were given thirty (30) days to abate the nuisance on the Property; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2025, the City filed in California Superior Court in Fresno County for and received an "Abatement Warrant and Order Authorizing Entry onto the Proposed Property to Abate Public Nuisance" ("Court Order"). The Court Order authorized Code Enforcement to enter the Property, demolish the dwelling, remove all trash, debris, and abandoned material, and secure the premises with fencing and a no trespassing sign. The City complied with the Court Order; and
WHEREAS, the City seeks to recover the cost to abate the nuisance on the Property; and WHEREAS, the unpaid balance for unpaid nuisance abatement costs related to the Property total Thirty-One Thousand Ninety-Three Dollars and Seventeen Cents ($31 ,093.17); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Municipal Code section 4-2-13, the City may impose a special assessment against real property that is the subj ect of unpaid nuisance abatement costs; and WHEREAS, to authorize a special assessment to be placed on the Property for inclusion in the 2026-27 tax roll, the City Council must confirm the amount of the assessment at a regularly scheduled or special meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council, having reviewed the staff report and attachments for this matter, including Code Enforcement's itemization of outstanding nuisance abatement costs, which are incorporated herein by reference, and after receiving, reviewing, and considering any comments, arguments, and materials presented at the duly noticed hearing, hereby resolves as follows:
1. The total amount of the special assessment in the amount of Thirty-One Thousand Ninety-Three Dollars and Seventeen Cents ($31,093.17) for the Property is confirmed.
2. The City Manager is instructed to record a Notice of Lien in the Office of the Fresno County ("County") Recorder and tum over the recorded lien to the tax collector for the County.
This Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Reedley on October 28, 2025, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
ATTEST:
Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
2 October 1 , 2025
By First-Class U.S. Mail
Joseph Anthony Pena
Jerrod Andrew Pena
3026 W. Country Court
Visalia, CA 93277
City of Reedley
Community Development Department
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93654
(559) 637-4200
https://reedley.ca.gov
Re: Notice to Property Owner of Hearing Confirming Special Assessment for Nuisance Abatement Dear Property Owners:
Pursuant to City of Reedley ("City") Municipal Code section 1-12-9, this letter serves as notice that the City will conduct a hearing at Reedley City Hall, at 845 "G" Street, Reedley, California 93654, on October 28, 2025, at 7:00 p.m. ("Hearing"), to determine whether to place a special assessment on your real property located at 1451 9th Street, Reedley, California 93654 ("Property") for unpaid nuisance abatement costs.
You were mailed the enclosed invoice on August 5, 2025, in the amount of Thirty-One Thousand NinetyThree Dollars and Seventeen Cents ($31,093.17), which details the cost to the City to abate the nuisance on the Property. At the Hearing, the City Council will confirm the amount, including late fees, administrative charges, and recording fees, and determine whether a special assessment should be placed on the Property for inclusion in the 2026-27 tax roll.
At the Hearing, the City Council will adopt a resolution confirming the amount of the assessment.
Following the adoption of a resolution by the City Council, the City Clerk will file a notice of lien in the Office of the Fresno County Recorder and will place a property tax assessment with the Office of the Fresno County Tax Collector. You may protest the special assessment orally (in-person) at the Hearing.
The Property may, in some cases, be sold after three (3) years by the Fresno County Tax Collector pursuant to Revenue and Tax Code section 3691 for unpaid delinquent assessments or be subject to judicial foreclosure before the three (3) years.
If you have any questions regarding the Hearing, please contact Rodney Horton, Community Development Director, by phone at 559-637-4200 or by e-mail at: Rodney [email protected].
Sincerely,
{
1 if(J:2 Di_gitally signed by
. · Rodney Horton
. , Date: 10/01/25
Rodney Horton, Director
Enclosures: Invoice
City of Reedley
Fire Department
To:
Joseph Anthony Pena, Jerrod Andrew Pena
3026 W Country Ct. Visalia, CA 93277
Job
- -- - - - ---------- ' 1451 Ninth Street Abatement
Invoice
Date: August 5, 2025
Invoice#:
Customer ID:
Qty Description Account Number Unit Price Line Total
4.00 24.00
1.00 33.70
4.35 2.50
9.30 4.25
Community Development Director - Rodney Horton
Code Enforcement Officer - Jesalyn Harper
102.87 : $ 411.48 - - r -- - --- --
48.69 I $ 1,168.56 ,_ ~- ,_ - -·-- -------·- Efrain Yanez Construction, Inc .
Attorney Fees
Billing and Accounting
Breakdown of Billing S Accounting Fees
Assistant City Manager
Finance Manager
Senior Accountant
Accountant
Make all checks payable to City of Reedley
Thank you for your business!
21 ,000.00 $ 21,000.00
$ 7,032.50
5% $ 1,480.63
136.44 $ 593.51
__9 3.88 l!. _____ 2_3_4_.1_0
51.05 1 $ 473.61
43. 11 ! $ 183.22
Subtotal $ 31,093.17 -----------t
Sales Tax
Total S 31 ,093.17
-----------
845 G. St, Reedley, CA 93618, 559-637-4200, [email protected]
INVOICE
Efrain Yanez Construction, Inc
42931 Road 52
Reedley, CA 93654-9117
billi [email protected]
+1 (559) 638-6644
ya nezconstructi on. com
City of Reedley - Customer:25012 - City of Reedley - Residential Demo Bill to Ship to
Rodney Horton
City of Reedley- Customer
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Invoice details
Invoice no.: 25012-0001
Terms: Net 30
Invoice date: 07/07/2025
Due date: 08/06/2025
# Product or service
1. 4000 Demolition
Description
City of Reedley- Customer
1451 9th Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Demolition and proper disposal of home located at
1451 9th St Reedley CA 93654. Yanez Construction will
get the clearance from San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution .
All permitting from City Of Reedley is customer's
responsibility . After demolition of home, Yanez
Construction w ill grade empty lot.
Total
Thank you for your business. We accept credit cards, ACH payments, and checks can be sent to 42931 Road 52, Reedley, CA 93654.
Amount
$21,000.00
$21,000.00
Fee Transaction Listing
Listing Order: Transaction Date. Cl ient-Matter Code
Client: City of Reedley
Matter: Code Enforcement
Date: 4/1/2025 through 12/30/1899
1 Record Date Prsn Staf ·
Client: 001910 - City of Reedley
Descri tion
Entry by: All
Person : All
Service: All
Fee State : (Incomplete) (UnReleased) (Released)
Fee Status : (Selected) (Deferred) (Invoiced )
Time Amount
Matter: 000030 - Code Enforcement
Lozano Smith 07/ 21/2025 04 :46pni
Fee Transaction Listing
Listing Order: Transaction Date, Client-Matter Code
Client: City of Reedley
Entry by: All
Person: All
Service: All
Matter: Code Enforcement
Date: 4/1/2025 through 12/30/1899
Fee State : (Incomplete) (UnReleased) (Released)
Fee Status : (Selected) (Deferred) (Invoiced)
Record Date Prsn Stat Descri tion Time Amount
Client: 001910 - City of Reedley Matter: 000030 - Code Enforcement - --l ----------• - l
2529800 4/18/2025 MML P Review and analyze code enforcement records relating to City's request for abatement warrant; legal strategy and analysis regarding same. (1451 9th Street)
2535271 4/18/2025 MGP P Legal analysis and review of documents provided to support application for abatement warrant regarding 1451 9th Street; Office conference regarding same.
2521025 4/21/2025 MGP P Draft application for abatement warrant and proposed abatement warrant and order regarding 1451 9th Street.
2521104 4/22/2025 MGP P Further draft application for abatement warrant; draft supporting declarations regarding 1451 9th St. --- - -
0.90 1.50
0,40
$202.50
$337.50
$247.50
$90.00
-------- - --~---- ~-
2530158 4/24/2025 MML P Legal strategy and discussion regarding documents required for 0.20 $45.00 • •
--------- -----~----------- - -------
2546870 5/2/2025 MGP P Further draft and revi$e ?PPlication for abatement warrant, supporting declaration, and proposed order regarding 1451 9th St.
1.30 -----·-
-
2554310 5/13/2025 MML P Legal strategy regarding application for abatement warrant.(1451 9th 0.20 Street)
2557368 5/20/2025 MML P Review and revise abatement warrant application and supporting 2.00 documents; legal strategy and discussion regarding same. (1451 9th Street)
2548988 5/21/2025 MGP P Further legal analysis and revision of application for abatement warrant 0.30 and supporting documents based updated information.
25567 41 5/21/2025 MML P Review and revise documents in support of abatement warrant. ( 1451 1.00 9th Street)
$292.50
$45.00
$450.00
$67.50
$225.00
.... - - 07/ 21 / 202 5 04 .l 6µrn
Fee Transaction Listing
Listing Order: Transaction Date, Client-Matter Code
Client: City of Reed ley
Entry by: All
Person : All
Service: All
Matter: Code Enforcement
Date: 4/ 1/2025 through 12/30/1899
Fee State: (Incomplete) (UnReleased) (Released)
Fee Status : (Selected) (Deferred) (Invoiced)
Record Date Prsn Staf , · Descri tion Time I Amount
Client: 001910 - City of Reedley Matter: 000030 - Code Enforcement ----~
- . . .
2581207 6/4/2025 MML p Review and revise documents in support of abatement warrant; review 0.30 $67.50 and respond to correspondence from J. Harper regarding declaration in support of same. (1451 9th Street)
2582150 6/5/2025 MML p Prepare documents in support of the issuance of an abatement 0.30 $67.50 warrant for filing and service. (1451 9th St.)
2582333 6/6/2025 MML p Transmit correspondence to J. Harper regarding filing of abatement 0.10 $22.50 warrant for 1451 9th Street.
2582448 6/10/2025 MML p Check status of filing for abatement warrant at 1451 Ninth Street. 0.20 $45.00 - -- - ~ ---- - --~- ----------- -----
2584275 6/19/2025 MML p Check status on abatement warrant filing. (1451 9th Street) 0,10 $22.50 2577731 6/23/2025 MGP p Legal analysis and review of abatement warrant and order from court 0.60 $135.00 regarding 1451 9th Street.
2585479 6/23/2025 MML p Review and analyze signed abatement warrant; legal strategy and 0.50 $112.50 discussion regarding execution of warrant. (1451 9th Street) 2577491 6/24/2025 MGP p Further legal analysis of abatement warrant and order; legal research 0.60 $135.00 regarding same.
2585157 6/24/2025 MML p Legal strategy and discussion regarding obtaining an extension on 0.20 $45.00 abatement warrant and follow-up with City staff. (1451 Ninth Street) ~ ~ - --- -- - - -
2585983 6/25/2025 MML P Review and respond to correspondence from J. Harper regarding potential extension on abatement warrant; legal strategy and discussion regarding same. (1451 Ninth Street) -----
2586608 6/27/2025 MML p Legal strategy and discussion regarding drafting request for extension on abatement warrant. (1451 Ninth Street)
2586898 6/30/2025 MML p Legal strategy and discussion regarding preparing extension of abatement warrant. (1451 9th Street}
Matter Total
Fee Transaction Listing Total
0.20 $45.00
0.30 $67.50
0.20 $45.00
33.70 $7,032.50
33.70 $7,032.50
07/2 1/ 2025 O<lA6p11 1
Fee Transaction Listing
Timekeeper Summary
Timekeeper Time Amount
LAF - Avedisian-Favini, Laurie 1.00 $225.00
ALB - Bernal, Alexandra R. 4.70 $540.50
MML - Lear, Matthew M. 17.90 $4,027.50
MXO - Olmos, Matthew X. 0.30 $34.50
MGP - Prentice, Michael G. 6.10 $1,372.50
JPT - Thompson, Jennifer P. 3.70 $832 .50
33.70 $7,032.50
07 / 21/20.25 0'1 -llipm
DATE: October 28, 2025
REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
~ Receive/Review
ITEM NO: \(o ----
TITLE: RECEIVE, REVIEW, AND FILE THE 2024-25 FISCAL YEAR ANNUAL
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE REPORT
SUBMITTED: Paul A. Melikian, Assistant City Manage
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council receive, review, and file the attached FY 2024-25 Annual Developer Impact Fee Report, in compliance with Government Code Section 66006(a) and (b). No action is required other than to receive, review, and file the report, which will also be uploaded to the Financial Information page of the City's website.
BACKGROUND
A Development Impact Fee is a monetary exaction other than a tax or special assessment that is charged by a local governmental agency to an applicant in connection with approval of a development project for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of public facilities related to the development project. (Gov't Code§ 66000(b).) Agencies that collect and utilize Developer Impact Fees are required to provide information on each fund or account established for the collection of impact fees.
Within 180 days after the last day of each fiscal year, this information must be made available to the public for the period covered by that fiscal year. The information must provide the following:
1. A brief description of the type of fee in the fund.
2. The amount of the fee.
3. The beginning and ending balances of the fund.
4. The amount of fees collected and the interest earned.
5. An identification of each public improvement on which fees were expended and the amount of expenditures on each improvement, including the total percentage of the improvement that was funded with Impact fees.
6. An identification of an approximate date by which the construction of the public improvement will commence if the City determines that sufficient funds have been collected to complete financing on an incomplete public improvement.
7. A description of each inter-fund transfer or loan made from the fund, including the public improvement on which the transferred or loaned fees were expended; and in the case of an interfund loan, the date on which the loan will be repaid and the rate of interest that will be received on the loan.
8. The amount of refunds made per Government Code Section 66001 (e).
Once the information is made available to the public, but not less than 15 days from the date it is made available, the City Council must review the information at its next regularly scheduled meeting. The 2024-25 Impact Fee Report provides information on the following infrastructure service types (funds):
• Fund 100 - Transportation Facilities • Fund 105 - Wastewater Facilities • Fund 102 - Law Enforcement Facilities • Fund 109 - Park & Recreation Facilities • Fund 103 - Fire Facilities • Fund 110 - General Govt Facilities • Fund 104 - Storm Drainage Facilities • Fund 111 - Water Facilities The attached report includes a summary for all funds and individual pages that provide detail of activity by infrastructure service type. Current Development Impact Fees are published in the Citywide Master Fee Schedule, and were comprehensively updated this year.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact as a result of filing this annual report.
ATTACHMENTS
2024-25 Development Impact Fee Report
2024-25 Citywide Master Fee Schedule
City of Reedley
Development Impact Fee
Annual Report
Fiscal Year 2024-25
Table of Contents
Impact Fee Summary ......................................................... ... .. ....... ..... ... ..... ... .................. ....... . 1 Transportation Facilities ... ... ......... ... ............. ......... .... ......... ... .... .... ......... ... ... ....... ... ..... .. ..... ..... . 2 Law Enforcement Facilities ... ......... ............................ ........ .... .... ... .. ....... ...... ............................ 3 Fire Facilities ......... ... ....... .. .. ............. .. ............... ... .... ... ... ... .......... .... ..... .......... .... ... ... .. ..... ........ . 4 Storm Drain Facilities ........... .................. .. .......... ... .. ... ... ...................................................... ... .. 5 Wastewater Facilities .. ........ .......................................................... ... ..... ................ ........ ... .. .. ... . 6 Park & Recreation Facilities ..... ...... ........................ ............ ... ... .... .. .......................................... 7 General Government Facilities ....... ................... ..... ......... ... ... ........... ... ......... ..... ... .... .......... .. .... 8 Water Facilities ..... ................................................................... ... ... .......... .... ......... .... .. .... ..... .. .. 9 Schedule of Development Impact Fees (Excerpt from Citywide Master Fee Schedule) .......... 10 Fund 100 - Transportation Facilities $
Fund 102 - Law Enforcement Facilities $
Fund 103 - Fire Facilities $
Fund 104 - Storm Drain Facilities $
Fund 105 - Wastewater Facilities $
Fund 109 - Parks & Recreation Facilities $
Fund 110 - General Government Facilitie $
Fund 111 - Water Facilities $
Total $
Summary Annual Development Impact Fee Report for FY 2024-25 Fund Balance
June 30, 2024
2,742,671
27,649
400,435
2,065,096
853,991
1,090,443
41,998
1,006,611
8,228,893
2024-25 Revenue
$ 444,087 $
$ 9,028 $
$ 86,671 $
$ 336,588 $
$ 192,677 $
$ 158,151 $
$ 6,614 $
$ 238,661 $
$ 1,472,477 $
2024-25
Expenditures
527,726
6,127
12,157
63,570
25,904
1,084,298
32,934
15,893
1,768,609
1 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Fund Balance
June 30, 2025
2,659,032
30,550
474,949
2,338,114
1,020,764
164,296
15,678
1,229,379
7,932,761
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2025-26
Estimated
Revenue
465,000
11,000
115,500
385,000
235,700
202,500
10,200
245,200
1,670,100
2025-26 Adopted
Budget
$ 1,403,107
$ 37,630
$ 202,574
$ 396,721
$ 468,121
$ 198,500
$ 40,368
$ 1,232,858
$ 3,979,879
Projected Ending
Resources
Available June 30,
2026
$ 1,720,925
$ 3,920
$ 387,875
$ 2,326,393
$ 788,343
$ 168,296
$ (14,490}
$ 241,721
$ 5,622,982
Annual Development Impact Fee Report 2024-25
Fund 100 - Transportation facilities
Beginning Fund Balance $ 2,142,61:1! 1
Revenue 2024-25
Development Impact Fees $ 275,134
Investment Interest $ 147,964
Miscellanous $ 20,989
$ 444,087
Expenditures 2024-25
DIF Administration Services $ 41,629
Development Improvement $ 40,729
Hollywood & Acacia $ 52
Developer Reimbursement $ 385,316
Citywide ADT $ 20,000
Speed Survey $ 40,000
$ 527,726
Ending Fund Balance $ 2,659,032
Revenue 2025-26
Development Impact Fees $ 350,000
Investment Interest $ 115,000
$ 465,000
Appropriations 2025-26
DIF Administration Services $ 31,834
Hollywood & Acacia $ 1,150,000
Reed Ave Signal $ 183,773
General Plan $ 37,500
$ 1,403,107
Projected Ending Resources Available $ 1,720,925
2 Fund 102 - Law Enforcement Facilities
Beginning Fund Balance $ 27,649
Revenue 2024-25
Development Impact Fees $ 7,554
Investment Interest $ 1,474
$ 9,028
Expenditures 2024-25
Prior Yr PO's $ 6,127
$ 6,127
Ending Fund Balance $ 30,550
Revenue 2025-26
Development Impact Fees $ 10,000
Investment Interest $ 1,000
$ 11,000
Appropriations 2025-26
DIF Administration Services $ 130
General Plan $ 37,500
$ 37,630
Projected Ending Resources Available $ 3,920
3 _.J,i,i!Eil@§M•l,,i§,iii,,idliU@·HiiMJH~
Fund 103 - Fire Facilities
Beginning Fund Balance
Revenue 2024-25
Development Impact Fees
Investment Interest
Expenditures 2024-25
DIF Administration Services
Prior Year Purchase Orders
Ending Fund Balance
Revenue 2025-26
Development Impact Fees
Investment Interest
Appropriations 2025-26
DIF Administration Services
Cricket Hollow Storage
General Plan
Firefighter Turnout Room
CalOES Upgrade
Projected Ending Resources Available
4 $
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
400,435
64,103
22,568
86,671
6,030
6,127
12,157
474,949 !
100,000
15,500
115,500
9,468
70,000
37,500
55,000
30,606
202,574
387,875 !
;i-.- • ,. • 1 :t"::t.; ... .,~ \~~ 'l!!:.f!''Jl,[f'.r.11,11iulli'~ "'~t"l!l': ~,tt,;,: .... n .. ·,,rnmt:i-t•>:h~i•l,oi:Jf<,, ,, ,. 1 ... ~ • 1 ' Annual'Development Impact Fee Report'2024-25
Fund 104 - Storm Drain Facilities
Beginning Fund Balance $ 2,065,096 I
Revenue 2024-25
Development Impact Fees $ 224,729
Investment Interest $ 111,859
$ 336,588
Expenditures 2024-25
DIF Administration Services $ 29,529
Prior Year PO's $ 34,041
$ 63,570
Ending Fund Balance $ 2,338,114 I
Revenue 2025-26
Development Impact Fees $ 300,000
Investment Interest $ 85,000
$ 385,000
Appropriations 2025-26
DIF Administration Services $ 50,631
General Plan $ 37,500
Shoemake Enn SD $ 125,000
Master Plan $ 183,590
$ 396,721
Projected Ending Resources Available $ 2,326,393 I
5 Beginning Fund Balance $ s53,991 I
Revenue 2024-25
Development Impact Fees $ 143,195
Investment Interest $ 49,482
$ 192,677
Expenditures 2024-25
DIF Administration Services $ 12,359
Developer Reimbursement $ 13,545
$ 25,904
Ending Fund Balance $ l ,020,764 j
Revenue 2025-26
Development Impact Fees $ 200,000
Investment Interest $ 35,700
$ 235,700
Appropriations 2025-26
DIF Administration Services $ 22,683
Hollywood Acacia $ 224,348
General Plan $ 183,590
Master Plan $ 37,500
$ 468,121
Projected Ending Resources Available $ 788,343 j
6 Fund 109 - Parks & Recreation Facilities
Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,090,443
Revenue 2024-25
Development Impact Fees $ 131,682
Investment Interest $ 26,469
$ 158,151
Expenditures 2024-25
Prior Yr PO's $ 1,078,252
Sports Park Construction $ 6,046
$ 1,084,298
Ending Fund Balance $ 164,296 I
Revenue 2025-26
Development Impact Fees $ 180,000
Investment Interest $ 22,500
$ 202,500
Appropriations 2025-26
Sports Park Construction $ 86,000
Community Center Expansion $ 75,000
General Plan $ 37,500
$ 198,500
Projected Ending Resources Available $ 16s,296 1
7 ftll!.Y!l'-"lflf~•',.,"'"~,j ,,J,, 1"1' .. ~ a,.'f..,...,~ \'!f-:"1~:1.,""r.-h~Ptfk'_l~Kl'\!;~~:'f! ' , Annual Development Impact Fee Report 2024-25
Fund 110 - General Government Facilities
Beginning Fund Balance $ 41,998 I
Revenue 2024-25
Development Impact Fees $ 5,714
Investment Interest $ 900
$ 6,614
Expenditures 2024-25
Prior Year PO's $ 7,648
City Hall Remodel $ 25,286
$ 32,934
Ending Fund Balance $ 15,678 I
Revenue 2025-26
Development Impact Fees $ 10,000
Investment Interest $ 200
$ 10,200
Appropriations 2025-26
Prior Year POs $ 2,868
General Plan $ 37,500
$ 40,368
Projected Ending Resources Available $ (14,490) 1
8 Fund 111 - Wateri facilities
Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,006,611! I
Revenue 2024-25
Development Impact Fees $ 180,261
Investment Interest $ 58,400
$ 238,661
Expenditures 2024-25
DIF Administration Services $ 15,893
$ 15,893
Ending Fund Balance $ 1,229,379 I
Revenue 2025-26
Development Impact Fees $ 200,000
Investment Interest $ 45,200
$ 245,200
Appropriations 2025-26
DIF Administration Services $ 26,768
Hollywood Acacia $ 985,000
General Plan $ 37,500
Master Plan $ 183,590
$ 1,232,858
Projected Ending Resources Available $ 241,121 I
9 City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:
Transportation
Expansion Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
City Center
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
In-fill Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:
Law Enforcement
Expansion Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
City Center
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
In-fill Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
$
$
10 Fees Resolution No.
6,080.47 2024-036
3,316.62 2024-036
1,520.12 2024-036
2,653 .29 2024-036
1,580.92 2024-036
1,547.75 2024-036
3,040.24 2024-036
1,658.31 2024-036
762.83 2024-036
1,326.65 2024-036
790.47 2024-036
773.88 2024-036
4,560.36 2024-036
2,487.47 2024-036
1,140.09 2024-036
1,989.98 2024-036
1,185.69 2024-036
1,160.82 2024-036
134.70 2024-036
129.38 2024-036
33.67 2024-036
30.97 2024-036
8.51 2024-036
4.76 2024-036
67 .37 2024-036
64.71 2024-036
16.84 2024-036
15.51 2024-036
4.26 2024-036
2.39 2024-036
101.03 2024-036
97.05 2024-036
25.26 2024-036
23.24 2024-036
6.38 2024-036
3.57 2024-036
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:
Fire Protection
Expansion Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
City Center
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
In-fill Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:
General Government
Expansion Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
City Center
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
In-fill Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
$
$
11 Fees Resolution No.
1,1 81 .13 2024-036
1,134.51 2024-036
295.29 2024-036
271 .53 2024-036
74.60 2024-036
41 .78 2024-036
590.57 2024-036
567.26 2024-036
147.64 2024-036
135.77 2024-036
37.30 2024-036
20.88 2024-036
885.85 2024-036
850.88 2024-036
221.47 2024-036
203.65 2024-036
55.95 2024-036
31.33 2024-036
77.52 2024-036
74.46 2024-036
19.38 2024-036
17.82 2024-036
4.89 2024-036
2.74 2024-036
38.74 2024-036
37.21 2024-036
9.68 2024-036
8.92 2024-036
2.45 2024-036
1.37 2024-036
58.14 2024-036
55 .84 2024-036
14.53 2024-036
13.36 2024-036
3.67 2024-036
2.06 2024-036
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:
Storm Drainage
Expansion Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
City Center
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
In-fill Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:
Wastewater
Expansion Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
City Center
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
In-fill Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq. ft. )
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
$
$
12 Fees Resolution No.
3,772.25 2024-036
2,414.24 2024-036
943.07 2024-036
1,851.83 2024-036
1,479.88 2024-036
377.23 2024-036
1,886.13 2024-036
1,207.12 2024-036
471 .53 2024-036
925.92 2024-036
739.94 2024-036
188.62 2024-036
2,829.18 2024-036
1,810.68 2024-036
707.30 2024-036
1,388.87 2024-036
1,109.91 2024-036
282.92 2024-036
2,620.74 2024-036
2,515.91 2024-036
655.18 2024-036
1,520.03 2024-036
1,205.54 2024-036
995.88 2024-036
1,310 .37 2024-036
1,257.95 2024-036
327.59 2024-036
760.01 2024-036
602.77 2024-036
497.94 2024-036
1,965.56 2024-036
1,886.93 2024-036
491 .39 2024-036
1,140.02 2024-036
904.16 2024-036
746 .92 2024-036
City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule
Community Development Department
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:
Water
Expansion Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
City Center
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
In-fill Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Developer Impact Fee Detail by Infrastructure Service Type:
Parks and Recreation
Expansion Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
City Center
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/Institutional (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
In-fill Area
Single Family (per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family (per dwelling unit)
Accessory Unit (per dwelling unit)
Commercial/Retail (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Industrial/Warehouse (per 1,000 sq . ft.)
Public/I nstitutional (per 1,000 sq. ft.)
$
$
13 Fees Resolution No.
2,746.69 2024-036
2,636.82 2024-036
686.68 2024-036
2,472.02 2024-036
851.47 2024-036
219.74 2024-036
1,373 .34 2024-036
1,318.41 2024-036
343.34 2024-036
1,236.01 2024-036
425.74 2024-036
109.87 2024-036
2,060.02 2024-036
1,977 .61 2024-036
515.00 2024-036
1,854.01 2024-036
638.60 2024-036
164.80 2024-036
7,306.07 2024-036
7,017.67 2024-036
1,826.51 2024-036
1,679.63 2024-036
461.44 2024-036
258.40 2024-036
3,653.06 2024-036
3,508.86 2024-036
913.27 2024-036
839.82 2024-036
230.72 2024-036
129.21 2024-036
5,479.57 2024-036
5,263.27 2024-036
1,369.89 2024-036
1,259 .72 2024-036
346.08 2024-036
193.81 2024-036