Reedley City Council
July 28, 2026

ALL CELL PHONES AND ELECTRONIC DEVICES MUST BE

TURNED OFF IN THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS
AGENDA

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING
7:00 P.M.

TUESDAY, JULY 28, 2026
Meeting Held in the Council Chambers
845 "G" Street, Reedley, California
www .reedley.ca.gov
Peticiones para servicios de traducci6n deben ser sometidas 48 horas antes a la Secretaria Municipal al numero 637-4200 ext. 212
The Council Chambers are accessible to the physically disabled. Requests for additional accommodations for the disabled, including auxiliary aids or to request translation services, should be made 48 hours prior to the meeting by contacting the City Clerk at 637-4200 ext. 212.

Any document that is a public record and provided to a majority of the City Council regarding an open session item on the agenda will be made available for public inspection at City Hall, in the City Clerk's office, during normal business hours. In addition, such documents may be posted on the City's website.

Unless otherwise required by law to be accepted by the City at or prior to a Council meeting or hearing, no documents shall be accepted for Council review unless they are first submitted to the City Clerk by the close of business one day prior to said Council meeting/hearing at which the Council will consider the item to which the documents relate, pursuant to the adopted City Council Protocols.

The meeting will be held in person and may be observed remotely via Zoom or at:
http://www.reedley.com/livestream.php.

The City of Reedley offers members of the public an opportunity to remotely observe City Council Meetings through Zoom. Members of the public wishing to provide public comment may call (559) 500-0810 during the public comment period. Public comment may also be submitted in writing. Members of the public who wish to provide written comments are encouraged to submit their comments to the City Clerk at [email protected] by the close of business one day prior to the start of the meeting to ensure that the comments will be available to the City Council. Please indicate the agenda item number to which the comment pertains. Written comments that do not specify a particular agenda item will be marked for the general public comment portion of the meeting. A copy of any written comment will be provided to the City Council at the meeting. Please note that written comments received will not be read aloud during the meeting, but will be included with the meeting minutes.

Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
Mary Fast, Mayor Pro Tern
Christopher Arriaga, Council Member

MEETING CALLED TO ORDER
Michael Crutchfield, Council Member
Scott Friesen, Council Member
INVOCATION- Pastor Ron Robertson, Full Gospel Tabernacle

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

ROLL CALL

AGENDA APPROVAL - ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS

PRESENTATION

1. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PRESENTATION ON COMPREHENSIVE

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
PUBLIC COMMENT - Provides an opportunity for members of the public to address the City Council on items of interest to the public within the Council's jurisdiction and which are not already on the agenda this evening. It is the policy of the Council not to answer questions impromptu. Concerns or complaints will be referred to the City Manager's office. Speakers should limit their comments to not more than three (3) minutes. No more than ten (10) minutes per issue will be allowed. For items which are on the agenda this evening, members of the public will be provided an opportunity to address the Council as each item is brought up for discussion.

NOTICE TO PUBLIC
CONSENT AGENDA items are considered routine and a recommended action for each item is included, and will be voted upon as one item. If a Councilmember has questions, requests additional information, or wishes to comment on an item, the vote should not be taken until after questions have been addressed or comments made, and the public has had an opportunity to comment on the Consent Agenda items. If a Councilmember wishes to have an item considered individually or change the recommended action, then the item should be removed and acted upon as a separate item. A Councilmember's vote in favor of the Consent Agenda is considered and recorded as a separate affirmative vote in favor of each action listed. For adoption of ordinances, only those that have received a unanimous vote upon introduction are considered Consent items.

CONSENT AGENDA (Item 2-8)

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 23, 2026 - (City Clerk)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

3. RATIFY THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF REEDLEY AND ADVENTIST

HEAL TH REEDLEY, TO CONDUCT SPECIMEN COLLECTIONS FOR LEGAL DRUG SCREENING RELATED TO LAW ENFORCEMENT INVESTIGATIONS - (Police Department)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

4. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AN AMENDMENT TO THE

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH INTERWEST CONSUL TING GROUP

TO CONTINUALLY PERFORM ADDITIONAL ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT - (Community Development) Staff Recommendation: Approve

5. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-047 APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 CLAIMS FOR MEASURE C LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS FROM THE FRESNO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY - (Engineering) Staff Recommendation: Approve
2 6. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-048 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 ADOPTED BUDGET APPROPRIATING AN ADDITIONAL $58,700 IN ARTICLE 8 LOCAL

TRANSPORTATION FUNDS FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF A BUCKET TRUCK WITH MATERIAL HANDLER ATTACHMENT AND STABILIZING OUTRIGGERS - (Public Works)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

7. CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING ITEMS (A) AND (B) FOR THE REEDLEY WATER

EXTENSION/CONNECTIONS PROJECT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A WATER MAIN

ON PARLIER AVENUE AND COLUMBIA AVENUE
A. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-050 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE

PROJECT
B. ADOPT BUDGET AMENDMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-051 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE AVAILABLE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $86,000 FOR THE PROJECT
(Engineering)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

8. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-053 AMENDING THE 2026-27 ADOPTED BUDGET IN THE GENERAL FUND AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF $20,000 TO BE USED FOR FIRE STATION UPGRADES- (Fire Department)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

PUBLIC HEARING

9. CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ITEMS ASSOCIATED WITH A PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATED AT 1533 EAST MYRTLE AVENUE (APN 370-345-06):

A. INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 2026-002, AN

ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY
APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2026-05, A "COMMON SENSE" EXEMPTION; AND APPROVING REZONE APPLICATION NO. 2026- 01 AND AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT OF THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP

OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY
B. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2026-052, APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2026-06, A CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION DATED JULY 16, 2026, AND APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICATION NO. 2026- 01 Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate - (Community Development)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS

10.ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-049 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

REEDLEY DECLARING INTENTION TO REIMBURSE EXPENDITURES RELATING TO 3 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FROM THE PROCEEDS OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS AND HIRING FINANCING TEAM -- Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate - (Administration)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

11.ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-052 AWARDING A PROGRESSIVE DESIGN-BUILD

CONTRACT FOR THE REEDLEY CIVIC CENTER PROJECT TO HARRIS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AND DARDEN ARCHITECTS, INC. FOR THE REEDLEY CIVIC CENTER PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $574,250 AND FINDING

THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT - Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate - (Administration)
Staff Recommendation: Approve

12.CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS PERTAINING TO THE DESIGN AND PLACEMENT OF ART WORK WITHIN CAMACHO PARK, LOCATED AT 1000 E. NORTH AVENUE (APN:
370-030-28T & 370-030-19T):

A. ADOPT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2026-03 MAKING A FINDING

OF NO POSSIBILITY OF A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT, AND DECLARING THE

ACTIVITY IS NOT SUBJECT TO CEQA
B. APPROVE SIGN PERMIT APPLICATION NO. 2026-07 FOR THE DESIGN AND PLACEMENT OF ARTWORK WITHIN CAMACHO PARK, LOCATED AT 1000 E.

NORTH AVENUE (APN: 370-030-28T & 370-030-19T)
Report, discussion and/or other Council action to approve, modify, and/or take other action as appropriate - (Community Development/Community Services) Staff Recommendation: Approve

RECEIVE INFORMATION & REPORTS
These items are formal transmittals of information to the Reedley City Council. They are not voted upon by the Reedley City Council. Members of the public who have questions on these items are suggested to call City staff members during regular business hours.

13. REEDLEY AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MAY 14, 2026 - Community Services

14. REEDLEY COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF APRIL 23, 2026 - Community Services

15. REEDLEY TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF MARCH 12, 2026 - Engineering

16. REEDLEY'S RIVER CITY THEATRE COMPANY, PROFIT & LOSS STATEMENT FOR THE PERIOD OF NOVEMBER 1 - JUNE 30, 2026- Community Services

17.QUARTERLY EXPENSE & TRAVEL REPORT FOR ELECTED AND APPOINTED OFFICIALS - APRIL 1, 2026 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2026 - Administrative Services 4 COUNCIL REPORTS

18. BRIEF REPORT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON CITY RELATED ACTIVITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE BROWN ACT AND REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS.

STAFF REPORTS

19.UPDATES AND/OR REPORTS BY CITY MANAGER AND/OR STAFF MEMBERS

CLOSED SESSION

20. Government Code Section 54956.9

CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL-ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
Initiation of Litigation Pursuant to Paragraph (4) of Subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9 (Deciding Whether to Initiate Litigation):

One case

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

ADJOURNMENT
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury, under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing agenda was posted in accordance with the applicable legal requirements. Dated this 23rd day of July 2026.

Dates to Remember:

August 11, 2026 - Dark
August 25, 2026 - Regular meeting 7pm
5 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - June 23, 2026
A complete audio record of the minutes is available at www.reedley.ca.gov The meeting of Reedley City Council was called to order by Mayor Tuttle at 7:01 p.m. on June 23, 2026 in the City Hall Council Chambers, 845 "G" Street, Reedley, California.

INVOCATION - Pastor Jeremy Manning, Awaken Church

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Crutchfield.

ROLL CALL
Council Members

Present:

Absent:

Christopher Arriaga, Michael Crutchfield, Mary Fast, Scott Friesen and Matthew Tuttle None.

AGENDA APPROVAL - ADDITIONS AND/OR DELETIONS
Council Member Friesen motioned, Council Member Crutchfield seconded to accept and approve agenda.

Motion unanimously carried.

PRESENTATION
I. JULY IS PARKS & RECREATION MONTH PROCLAMATION

PUBLIC COMMENT
Dr. Eimear O'Brien shared she is a candidate for Fresno County Superintendent and will be on the November ballot.

CONSENT AGENDA (Item 2-7)
Council Member Fast requested to discuss item 4 and 6 prior to the vote. City Manager Nicole Zieba and Community Services Director Sarah Reid answered questions about the items.

Council Member Fast moved, Council Member Friesen seconded to accept, approve and adopt all items listed under the CONSENT AGENDA.

2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE REGULAR COUNCIL MEETING OF JUNE 9, 2026 -Approved

3. RECOMMENDATION OF REJECTION OF CLAIM -ARIANN EAST, ET AL -Approved Claim Rejection

4. APPROVAL OF EXPENSE REIMBURSEMENT FOR COUNCIL MEMBER FAST -Approved

5. ADOPT RESOLUTION 2026-042 DECLARING LISTED VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT AS SURPLUS - Approved

6. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-044 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO APPROVE, SIGN AND

SUBMIT A GRANT APPLICATION AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS TO THE FRESNO COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS (FCOG) FOR THE MEASURE C NEW TECHNOLOGY RESERVE GRANT PROGRAMApproved

7. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-045 APPROVING PARTICIPATION AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO SIGN A THREE-YEAR JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR FRESNO COUNTY'S

URBAN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM FOR PROGRAM YEAR 2027-28, 2028-29 AND 2029-30 - Approved
REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - June 23, 2026

ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS

8. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-040 ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FUNDED BY SBl; THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017 Council Member Mary Fast stated due to she owns property in the area she needed to recuse herself from this item.

Council Member Scott Friesen stated due to he also owns property in the area he also needed to recuse himself from this item.

Mayor Tuttle motioned to approve and Council Member Crutchfield seconded to accept and ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-040 ADOPTING A LIST OF PROJECTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FUNDED BY SB 1; THE ROAD REPAIR AND ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 2017
Motion unanimously carried.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Tuttle, Crutchfield, Arriaga.

None.

Fast, Friesen.

None.

9. APPROVAL OF ITEMS PERTAINING TO A SUCCESSOR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

WITH THE REEDLEY POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
A. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A TWO-YEAR

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING IN SUBSTANTIAL FORM BETWEEN THE CITY

OF REEDLEY AND THE REEDLEY POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-046 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY

ADOPTING MASTER SALARY TABLES FOR ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF

REEDLEY
Assistant City Manager Paul Melikian stated that staff is recommending that the City Council approve a 2 year Memorandum of Understanding with the Reedley Police Officers Association.

Council Member Friesen motioned to approve and Council Member Crutchfield seconded to accept and APPROVAL

OF ITEMS PERTAINING TO A SUCCESSOR MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE REEDLEY

POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
A. APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A TWO-YEAR

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING IN SUBSTANTIAL FORM BETWEEN THE CITY

OF REEDLEY AND THE REEDLEY POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION
B. ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-046 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY

ADOPTING MASTER SALARY TABLES FOR ALL EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF

REEDLEY
Motion unanimously carried.

WORKSHOP

10. CIVIC CENTER PROJECT FINANCING WORKSHOP
Assistant City Manager, Paul Melikian shared the vision and future time line of the new Reedley Civic Center.

11. PRESENTATION AND INFORMATION PERTAINING TO POLICE DEPARTMENT UPDATE Chief Ediger provided an in depth presentation on the Police Department and statistics of calls for service in the community.
2 REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL MEETING - June 23, 2026

COUNCIL REPORTS

12. BRIEF REPORT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS ON CITY RELATED ACTIVITIES AS AUTHORIZED BY THE

BROWN ACT AND REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS
Council Member Friesen
• Discussed the Employee Appreciation Luncheon he attended Council Member Arriaga
• Also discussed the Employee Appreciation Luncheon he attended Council Member Fast
• Shared about the Employee Appreciation Luncheon
• Discussed the Upper Kings River Water Authority meeting she attended • Mentioned the Good Morning Reedley she attended
Mayor Tuttle
• Also attended the Employee Appreciation Luncheon
• Discussed the Zoom meeting he attended with the Governor's Office • Mentioned the California Conservation Corps event

STAFF REPORTS

13. UPDATES AND/OR REPORTS BY CITY MANAGER AND/OR STAFF MEMBERS.

City Manager Nicole Zieba
• Discussed the upcoming Pickleball Courts Ribbon Cutting event City Engineer, Marilu Morales
• Provided an update on the road construction occurring on North Avenue

CLOSED SESSION

14. Government Code Section 54957
THREAT TO PUBLIC SERVICES OR FACILITIES; CONSIDERATION OF TACTICAL RESPONSE PLAN Consultation with: Marc A. Ediger, Chief of Police

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION
City Attorney Scott Cross reported that no action was taken in closed session.

ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Tuttle adjourned the regular meeting at 9:43 p.m.

ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
Mayor Matthew Tuttle
3 DATE:

TITLE:

SUBMITTED:

APPROVED:

RECOMMENDATION
July 28, 2026

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
~ Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: 3 ----

RATIFY THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF REEDLEY AND

ADVENTIST HEAL TH REEDLEY, TO CONDUCT SPECIMEN

COLLECTION FOR LEGAL DRUG SCREENING RELATED TO LAW

ENFORCMENT INVESTIGATIONS
Marc A Ediger, Chief of Police ~
Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager
Ratify the agreement between the City of Reedley and Adventist Health Reedley, to conduct specimen collection for legal drug screening related to law enforcement investigations.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The proposed agreement establishes a local, hospital-based process for the collection of specimens needed for legal drug screening in connection with Police Department investigations. Adventist Health Reedley would collect specimens at its Reedley facility for a fee of $45 per collection. The agreement is limited to collection services; the Police Department would remain responsible for transporting the individual to the hospital and delivering each collected specimen to the City's contracted toxicology laboratory for analysis.

BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION
Reedley Adventist Health notified the Police Department in late May 2026 of the closure of their existing toxicology and specimen laboratory services. Timely and properly documented specimen collection is crucial to criminal investigations in which toxicology evidence may be necessary. Adventist Health proposed an agreement, in which they would continue to conduct specimen collections, but not conduct lab services.

Under the proposed agreement, Adventist Health Reedley will provide specimen collection at their hospital, located at 372 W. Cypress Avenue in Reedley. The Police Department must transport the person to the hospital, either through the outpatient setting or the emergency department after hours.

The hospital will not provide mobile collection services.

Following collection, Police Department personnel must take custody of the specimen and transport it to the Department's contracted toxicology laboratory. Laboratory testing and analysis are not included in this agreement. Currently the toxicology specimens are being accepted for testing from the Police Department at Central Valley Toxicology (CVT) in Clovis, and the Department of Justice lab in Fresno, both of which have been used previously by the Police Department.

FISCAL IMPACT
The cost is usage-based at $45 per collection. No minimum volume or fixed annual payment is stated in the agreement. Total annual expense will depend on the number of collections requested. Costs will be paid from the Police Department's adopted operating budget. Ratification is requested of the attached services agreement due to expiration of available specimen collection options that was set to expire on June 30, 2026.

ATTACHMENT

1. Specimen Collection Agreement

SPECIMEN COLLECTION AGREEMENT
This SPECIMEN COLLECTION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into effective as of the date provided in Section (E) below ("Effective Date"), by and between Reedley Community Hospital dba Adventist Health Reedley having a principal place of business at 372 W Cypress Ave, Reedley, CA. 93654 and the entity identified below in Section (A). This Agreement may refer to Hospital and City of Reedley Police Department individually as a "Party" or collectively as the "Parties." This Agreement includes this cover page, the attached Recitals and General Terms and Conditions, and the attached exhibits identified below.
(A) Legal Name: City of Reedley ("City")
Address for notices: City of Reedley-Police Department
843 G Street
Reedley, CA. 93654
Notices shall comply with Section 34.
(B) Hospital's address for notices: ("Hospital")
Reedley Community Hospital dba
Adventist Health Reedley
3 72 W. Cypress Ave
Reedley, CA. 93654
Attention: Director of Laboratory
With a copy to: Adventist Health System/West
One Adventist Health Way
Roseville, California 95661
Attention: Office of General Counsel
Notices shall comply with Section 34.
(C) Services beirnr Purchased: See Exhibit 1.1 ("Services") (D) Term Length: IZl l year 02 years 03 years D Other: See Section 4 (E) Effective Date: date of last signature ("Effective Date") (F) The following attached exhibits are an integral part of this Agreement:

Exhibit 1.1: Description of Services and Compensation
[signature page follows]
The Parties, through their duly authorized representatives, have executed this Agreement effective as of the Effective Date.

Adventist Health Reedley
By:
' Heu/c~ T~OliclcuWO-n
Name: Heidar Thordarson
Title: Treasurer
Date0? /16/2026
City of Reedley
Name: Paul A. Melikian
Title: Assistant City Manager
Dat07/20/2026

SPECIMEN COLLCTION AGREEMENT

RECITALS
A. Hospital owns and operates a general acute care hospital located at 372 W. Cypress Ave, Reedley, CA. 93654.

B. City of Reedley Police Department wishes to engage Hospital to provide specimen collection only for legal drug screens as described in this Agreement and Hospital wishes to perform such services for compensation in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

In consideration of these recitals and the terms and conditions below, the Parties agree as follows:

AGREEMENT
IN CONSIDERATION of the foregoing recitals and the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the Parties agree as follows:

1. Services. City hereby engages Hospital to perform the services described in Exhibit 1.1 (the "Services"). Services shall be performed in the time and manner, and by employees and agents of Hospital ("Hospital Personnel") as described in Exhibit 1.1 and as otherwise mutually agreed by the Parties, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

2. Compensation. As consideration for the Services furnished by Hospital hereunder, City agrees to pay Hospital as set forth in Exhibit 1.1. Hospital shall seek and obtain compensation for the performance of the Services hereunder only from City of Reedley Police Department, and Hospital shall not bill, assess, or charge any fee, assessment, or charge of any type against any other person or entity for such services.

3. Timing of Payment. City shall pay any amounts due and payable to Hospital under this Agreement within thirty (30) days after the date of each Monthly Report.

4. Term. This Agreement shall begin on the Effective Date and continue for the term identified in Section D of the Cover Page. The Term of this Agreement may be renewed or extended upon the written agreement of the Parties.

5. Termination With Cause. This Agreement may be terminated by either Party, upon ten ( 10) days' prior written notice, if the other Party commits a material breach of this Agreement and fails to remedy such breach within such ten (10) day period.

6. Termination Without Cause. Either Party may terminate this Agreement without cause, expense, or penalty, effective thirty (30) days after written notice of termination is given to the other Party.

7. Rights Upon Termination. Upon any termination or expiration of this Agreement, all rights and obligations of the Parties shall cease except those rights and obligations that have accrued or expressly survive such termination or expiration. Within thirty (30) days from the expiration or te1mination for any reason of this Agreement, City of Reedley Police Department shall pay Hospital for all Services furnished by Hospital prior to the date of such expiration or termination and not yet paid for.

This Section shall survive the expiration or termination for any reason of this Agreement.

8. Hospital's Insurance. Hospital shall, at its sole cost and expense, procure and maintain such policies of general liability, professional liability and other insurance or programs of self-insurance deemed necessary by Hospital, or cause its agents to maintain such coverage, to insure Hospital or Hospital's employees and agents (collectively, "Hospital Parties") against claims for damages arising by reason of personal injuries or death caused by the performance of Services by Hospital Parties and the activities performed by Hospital Parties in connection with this Agreement.

9. Hold Harmless. Each Party shall be responsible for its own acts and omissions and the acts and omissions of its employees and agents; neither Party shall be responsible for the acts and omissions of the other Party or the other Party's employees and agents in carrying out this Agreement.

Neither Party shall be liable for any judgment, settlement, award, fine or otherwise, which arises out of the acts and omissions of such other Party, or its employees and agents, under this Agreement. To the extent either Party utilizes its own equipment, products, or other personal property in the performance of its obligations under this Agreement, such Party shall ensure that such equipment, product, or other personal property is suitable and fit for the purpose intended by such Party, free from defects which may damage the other Party, and otherwise operates in accordance with applicable government standards and safety regulations.

10. Code of Conduct. City hereby acknowledges receipt of Hospital's Code of Conduct which can be found at https://www.adventisthealth.org/pages/code-of-conduct.aspx (the "Code"). With respect to the business dealings of City and City's employees, independent contractors and agents with Hospital, and their respective performance of services in connection with the Services, neither City nor any of City's' employees, independent contractors or agents shall act in any manner which conflicts with or violates the Code, nor cause another person to act in any manner which conflicts with or violates the Code. City and each of City's' employees, independent contractors and agents shall comply with the Code as it relates to their business relationship with Hospital or any Adventist Health affiliates, subsidiaries, employees, agents, servants, officers, directors, contractors, and suppliers of every kind.

11. Independent Contractor. Hospital is and shall at all times be an independent contractor with respect to City in meeting its responsibilities under this Agreement. Nothing in this Agreement is intended nor shall be construed to create a partnership, employer-employee or joint venture relationship between Hospital and City.

12. No Benefit Contributions. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, neither Party shall have any obligation under this Agreement to compensate or pay applicable taxes for or provide employee benefits of any kind (including contributions to government mandated, employment-related insurance and similar programs) to or on behalf of the other Party or any other person employed or retained by the other Party.

13. Limitation on Control. Hospital shall neither have nor exercise any control or direction over City's' professional medical judgment or the methods by which City performs professional medical services; provided, however, that Parties shall be subject to and shall at all times comply with the protocols and the bylaws, guidelines, policies and rules applicable to other members of the Medical Staff.

14. Practice of Medicine. City and Hospital acknowledge that Hospital is neither authorized nor qualified to engage in any activity which may be construed or deemed to constitute the practice of medicine. To the extent that any act or service required of, or reserved to, Hospital in this Agreement is construed or deemed to constitute the practice of medicine, the performance of such act or service by Hospital shall be deemed waived or unenforceable, unless this Agreement can be amended to comply with the law, in which case the Parties shall make such amendment. 2 15. Referrals shall be entitled to refer patients to any hospital or other health care facility or provider deemed by Party best qualified to deliver medical services to any particular patient. Nothing in this Agreement or in any other written or oral agreement between Hospital and Party, nor any consideration offered or paid in connection with this Agreement, contemplates or requires the admission or referral of any patients or business to Hospital or any Affiliate. In the event that any governmental agency, any court or any other judicial body of competent jurisdiction, as applicable, issues an opinion, ruling or decision that any payment, fee or consideration provided for hereunder is made or given in return for patient referrals, either Party may at its option terminate this Agreement with three (3) days' notice to the other Party. Parties' rights under this Agreement shall not be dependent in any way on the referral of patients or business to Hospital or any Affiliate by Party or any person employed or retained by Party.

16. Amendment. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by mutual written agreement of the Parties. Any such modification or amendment must be in writing, dated, signed by the Parties and explicitly indicate that such writing modifies or amends this Agreement.

17. Assignment. City may not assign any of City's rights, interests, duties, or obligations under this Agreement without Hospital's prior written consent, which consent may be given or withheld in Hospital's sole discretion. Any attempted or purported assignment by Party in violation of this Section shall be null and void. Hospital may, in its sole discretion, assign any or all of its rights, interests, duties, or obligations hereunder to any person or entity without the prior written consent of Party. Subject to the foregoing, this Agreement shall be binding on and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective heirs, successors, assigns and representatives.

18. Attorneys' Fees. If either Party brings an action or proceeding, arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the non-prevailing Party shall pay to the prevailing Party reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in bringing such action, including, without limitation, fees incurred in post judgment motions, contempt proceedings, garnishment, levy, debtor and third party examinations, discovery, bankruptcy litigation, arbitration, trial, and any appeal or review, all of which shall be deemed to have accrued upon the commencement of such action and shall be paid whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. Any judgment or order entered shall contain a provision providing for the recovery of attorneys' fees and costs incurred in enforcing such judgment. The prevailing Party shall be the Party who is identified in any judgment or order entered as the Party entitled to recover its costs of suit, whether or not the action or proceeding proceeds to final judgment or award.

19. Choice of Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of California, without giving effect to any choice of law or conflict of law rnles or provisions that would cause the application of the laws of any other jurisdiction.

20. Compliance with Laws. The Parties shall comply with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes and regulations of federal, state and local governments, including without limitation laws that require Party to disclose any economic interest or relationship with Hospital, and shall assist Hospital, as reasonably requested by Hospital, in Hospital's compliance with applicable laws and the standards, requirements, guidelines and recommendations of such nationally recognized accrediting organization as Hospital designates from time to time.

21. Compliance with HIPAA. The Parties acknowledge that each are a separate "Covered Entity" as such term is defined under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ( 42 U.S.C. § 1320d et. seq.), as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, and all rules and regulations promulgated thereunder ( collectively, "HIPAA"). As a Covered Entity separate from Hospital, Party shall implement all necessary policies, procedures, and 3 training to comply with HIPAA and other laws applicable to the use, maintenance, and disclosure of patient-related information. If requested by Hospital during the term of this Agreement, Party shall participate in an Organized Health Care Arrangement ("OHCA"), as such term is defined under HIP AA, and comply with Hospital's OH CA-related policies, procedures, and notice of privacy practices.

22. Compliance with Medicare Rules. To the extent required by law or regulation, each Party shall make available, upon written request from the other Party, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Comptroller General of the United States, or any other duly authorized agent or representative, this Agreement and such Party's books, documents and records. Each Party shall preserve and make available such books, documents, and records for a period of ten (10) years after the end of the term of this Agreement, or the length of time required by state or federal law. If a Party is requested to disclose books, documents or records pursuant to this Section for any purpose, the requesting Party shall notify the responsive Party of the nature and scope of such request, and responsive Party shall make available, upon written request of the requesting Party, all such books, documents or records.

23. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

24. Disclosure of Agreement. Party shall not disclose any of the provisions of this Agreement to any person or entity, other than Parties respective attorneys or accountants, without the prior written consent of Hospital, unless and only to the extent such disclosure is required by law, subpoena, or legal process. Party may disclose the provisions of this Agreement to any person or entity without the prior written consent of Hospital to the extent such disclosure is requested or required by (a) Parties' respective contracts existing as of the date of this Agreement; or (b) fiscal intermediaries, public agencies or commissions with governmental powers and duties related to disclosure of information which have the right to compel disclosure of such information.

25. Disclosure of Interests. Party shall provide to Hospital, as requested from time to time, information sufficient to disclose any ownership, investment or compensation interest or arrangement of Party, or of any Party Physician or Party Physician's immediate family members, in any entity providing "designated health services" (as such term is defined in the Stark Law (42 U.S.C. Section 1395nn) and its regulations) or any other health care services. This Section shall not impose on Hospital any disclosure or reporting requirements or obligations imposed on Party or Parties' Physicians under any governmental program or create an assumption of such disclosure obligations by Hospital. Party and Party Physicians shall have the sole responsibility to fulfill any such federal and/or state reporting requirements or obligations.

26. Dispute Resolution. If there is any dispute, claim, or controversy ("dispute") arising out of or relating to this Agreement, the parties shall meet and confer through their duly authorized representatives in good faith to resolve the dispute. If the dispute is not resolved to the mutual satisfaction of the parties within thirty (30) days of written notice of the dispute, the dispute shall be determined by binding arbitration in Fresno County, CA before one arbitrator. The Parties intend that the arbitrator shall decide all questions of arbitrability, not the courts. The arbitration shall be administered by JAMS pursuant to its Comprehensive Arbitration Rules and Procedures and in accordance with the Expediated Procedures in those rules. The arbitrator shall provide a written Award accompanying the reasons for the decision and arbitrator costs and fees shall be equally split between the parties. The Federal Arbitration Act shall apply if any part of this Agreement directly or indirectly affects or involves interstate commerce. Judgement on the Award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction and this Section shall not preclude the parties from seeking provisional remedies in aid of arbitration from a court of appropriate jurisdiction. The parties (a) acknowledge that the courts in Fresno County, CA have 4 appropriate jurisdiction and venue for such purposes; (b) consent to the jurisdiction to Fresno County, CA courts; and (c) waive all objections based on jurisdiction, venue, and forum non conveniens of such courts. This section shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

27. Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties regarding its subject matter, and supersedes any prior oral or written agreements, representations, understandings, or discussions between the Parties with respect to such subject matter. No other understanding between the Parties shall be binding on them unless set forth in writing, signed and attached to this Agreement.

28. Exhibits and Attachments. The attached exhibits and attachments, together with all documents incorporated by reference in the exhibits and attachments, form an integral part of this Agreement and are incorporated by reference into this Agreement.

29. Force Majeure. Neither Party shall be liable for nonperformance or defective or late performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement to the extent and for such periods of time as such nonperformance, defective performance or late performance is due to reasons outside such Party's control, including acts of God, war ( declared or undeclared), terrorism, action of any governmental authority, civil disturbances, riots, revolutions, vandalism, accidents, fire, floods, explosions, sabotage, nuclear incidents, lightning, weather, earthquakes, storms, sinkholes, epidemics, failure of transportation infrastructure, disruption of public utilities, supply chain interruptions, information systems interruptions or failures, breakdown of machinery or strikes ( or similar nonperformance, defective performance or late performance of employees, suppliers or subcontractors); provided, however, that in any such event, each Party shall use its good faith efforts to perform its duties and obligations under this Agreement.

30. Headings. The headings in this Agreement are intended solely for convenience of reference and shall be given no effect in the construction or interpretation of this Agreement.

31. Meaning of Certain Words. Wherever the context may require, any pronouns used in this Agreement shall include the corresponding masculine, feminine, or neuter forms, and the singular form of nouns shall include the plural and vice versa. Unless otherwise specified, "days" shall be considered "calendar days" and "months" shall be considered "calendar months" in this Agreement and its exhibits and attachments.

32. No Third-Party Beneficiary Rights. This Agreement shall not confer or be construed to confer any rights or benefits to any person or entity other than the Parties.

33. Notices. All notices or communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be given in writing and shall be delivered to the Party to whom notice is to be given either: (a) by personal delivery (in which case such notice shall be deemed given on the date of delivery); (b) by next business day courier service (e.g., Federal Express, UPS or other similar service) (in which case such notice shall be deemed given on the business day following date of deposit with the courier service); or ( c) by United States mail, first class, postage prepaid, registered or certified, return receipt requested (in which case such notice shall be deemed given on the third (3 rd) day following the date of deposit with the United States Postal Coverage Service). In each case, notice shall be delivered or sent to the address 5 indicated on the signature page, or such other address as provided by a Party, from time to time, pursuant to this Section.

34. Participation in Federal Health Care Programs. Each Party hereby represents that it is not debarred, suspended, excluded or otherwise ineligible to participate in any federal health care program (e.g. , Medicare, Medicaid, Tricare, etc.).

35. Representations. Each Party represents with respect to itself that: (a) no representation or promise not expressly contained in this Agreement has been made by any other Party or by any Parties' agents, employees, representatives or attorneys; (b) this Agreement is not being entered into on the basis of, or in reliance on, any promise or representation, expressed or implied, other than such as are set forth expressly in this Agreement; and (c) Party has been represented by legal counsel of Party's own choice or has elected not to be represented by legal counsel in this matter.

36. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement, in whole or in part, or the application of any provision, in whole or in part, is determined to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction and such provision can be severed without substantially changing the bargain reached by the Parties, such provision or part of such provision shall be severed from this Agreement, and such severance shall have no effect upon the enforceability, performance or obligations of the remainder of this Agreement, including the remainder of such provision not determined to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable.

37. Waiver. No delay or failure to require performance of any provision of this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of that provision as to that or any other instance. Any waiver granted by a Party must be in writing to be effective and shall apply solely to the specific instance expressly stated.

38. Waiver oflnjunctive or Similar Relief. Upon any breach or termination of this Agreement by Hospital that is determined to be improper by a court or by an arbitrator, Party shall accept monetary damages, if any, as full and complete relief, to the exclusion of any specific performance, or injunctive or similar equitable relief.
6 EXHIBIT 1.1
Description of Services and Compensation
Services provided shall be reimbursed by Company at listed below.

TEST DESCRIPTION CPTCODE Fee Schedule
Specimen Collection 36415 $45.00

1. Hospital will submit to Party a monthly itemized statement and corresponding copies of the completed test requisitions for Services rendered to City of Reedley Police Department by Hospital for the prior month and City of Reedley Police Department agrees to remit payment to Hospital within thirty (30) days after receipt of said statement and test requisitions. The statement must include the following information: patient name, patient identification number, patient address, patient date of birth, date of service, test name, CPT code(s) and fee.

2. This contract only covers agreement between Hospital and City of Reedley Police Department for specimen collection. Any sample collected must be taken by the City of Reedley Police Department to their contracted Toxicology laboratory for analysis.

3. The City of Reedley Police Department is responsible for bringing the patient to the Hospital either as outpatient or in the emergency room after hours. Hospitals do not provide mobile specimen collection services. 7 DATE:

TITLE:

July 28, 2026

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
C8J Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: 4 ----

APPROVE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AN

AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH

INTERWEST CONSUL TING GROUP TO CONTINUALLY PERFORM

ADDITIONAL ON-CALL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR THE

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SUBMITTED: Rodney L. Horton n I I /
Community Development Director ~ ~
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba L /
City Manager YY

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council approve and authorize the City Manager to make non-substantive changes to the attached amendment, and sign final amendment to the professional services agreement with lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc. (lnterwest) to perform on-call professional services for the Community Development Department.

BACKGROUND
The Community Development Department consists of the Planning and Building Divisions.

Each division is responsible for highly technical and complex assignments associated with the approval and development of structures and buildings proposed to be brought into the built environment. The Building Division is responsible for processing building permit applications in a timely manner, conducting building inspections, and ensuring new construction is compliant with the Reedley Municipal Code and the California Building Code.

Currently, as part of a longstanding professional services agreement, lnterwest provides plan review and inspection support to the department. Staff is proposing to extend the professional services agreement to November 1, 2027. The amendment includes a provision allowing for the ability to automatically extend for successive 12-month periods unless either party provides notice of termination. This agreement includes a wholesale replacement of Exhibit B, which reflects an inflationary adjustment in hourly rates for services performed by lnterwest.

The new fees will begin November 1, 2026.

On August 28, 2018, City Council approved the original on-call contract with lnterwest Consulting Group to provide Building Division support services. Currently, staff anticipates utilizing support services due to the consistently strong development activity.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no negative fiscal impact to the City given that the costs of service are determined per-project on an as-needed basis. Additionally, cost for services will be defrayed by fees paid by permit applicants.

PRIOR COUNCIL ACTIONS
City Council approved the original on-call contract with lnterwest Consulting Group on August 28, 2018, with the fifth amendment to the original contract being approved at the October 14, 2025 City Council meeting.

ATTACHMENTS

1. lnterwest Consulting Group - Draft Amendment No. 6 to Professional Services Agreement

2. Professional Services Agreement - Approved on August 28, 2018

AMENDMENT NO. SIX TO

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT

BETWEEN THE CITY OF REEDLEY AND
INTERWEST CONSULTING GROUP, INC.

This Amendment is entered into to amend the Professional Services Agreement previously entered into on September 4, 2018, by and between the City of Reedley, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City" and lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc., a California Corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Consultant". City and Consultant shall be jointly referred to as the "Parties".

Amendment Effective Date: This Amendment shall be effective on the latest date fully executed by both parties.

RECITALS
Parties entered into a Professional Service Agreement (Agreement), by which both Parties established the terms and conditions for service delivery on September 4, 2018; and
On February 24, 2021, Parties instituted Amendment No. One to the Agreement to update Exhibits A and B, extend terms of the Agreement to June 30, 2022; on May 25, 2022, Parties instituted Amendment Two to the Agreement to replace Exhibits A and B, extend terms of the Agreement to June 30, 2024; May 16, 2023, Parties instituted Amendment Three to the Agreement to add remote on-call building official services; November 1, 2024, Parties instituted Amendment No. Four to the Agreement to update Exhibit B; and on October 1, 2025, Parties extended terms of the Agreement to November 1, 2026 and to update Exhibits B.

Parties hereto now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth herein; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, Consultant and the City do hereby mutually agree as follows:

1. The End Date notated in Section 1.1 of the Agreement dated September 4, 2018, is amended to This Agreement to be effective as of the date first written above, and shall remain in effect for an initial term running through November 1, 2027, and will automatically extend for successive 12-month periods unless one party provides notice of termination.

Upon completion of the initial term and annually thereafter, the rates listed in Exhibit B (Fees for Services) shall be increased based upon the annual increase in the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics or successor thereof, Consumer Price Index (United States City Average, All Items (CPI-U), Not Seasonally adjusted, All Urban Consumers, referred to herein as the "CPI") for the Municipality or, if not reported for the Municipality the CPI for cities of a similar size within the applicable region from the previous calendar year, such increase, however, not to exceed 4% per annum. The increase will become effective upon publication of the applicable CPI data. If the index decreases, the rates listed shall remain unchanged.

Either party may at any time terminate this Agreement (i) without cause at the party's convenience by giving not less than 30 days prior written notice to the other party, or (ii) with cause upon written notice to the other party following the other party's failure to reasonably cure an event of non-performance hereunder following 30 days written notice thereof. Termination shall be effective as of the date specified in said notice of termination. Upon such termination, all rights and obligations of each party under this Agreement shall cease as of the Effective Date of Termination, except for those specific obligations that shall survive termination as set forth herein.

2. Exhibit B (Fees for Services) shall remain the same except as noted above. This Agreement may be modified and subject to mutual consent by execution of an addendum by authorized representatives of both parties , setting forth the additional scope of services to be performed, the performance time schedule and the compensation for such services.

3. In all other regards, the Agreement dated September 4, 2018, shall remain in full force and effect.

Matthew K.

Causley
Digitally signed by
Matthew K. Causley
Date: 2026.07.08
14:28:48 -04'00'
Matthew K. Causley, Chief Operating Officer
lnterwest Consulting Group, Inc.

Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager
City of Reedley
July 8, 2026
Date
Date

EXHIBIT- B

FEES FOR SERVICES
. Return to TOC: =
July 8, 2026
Rodney Horton - Community Development Director
City of Reedley
845 G Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Re: CPI Rate Increase for Building Department Services Agreement Dear Mr. Horton,

INTERWEST
A SAFEbui lt COMPANY
We appreciate the opportunity to continue supporting the City of Reedley with Building Department Services.

Per our professional services agreement, our hourly rates listed below shall be automatically increased annually based upon the annual increase in the Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics or successor thereof, Consumer Price Index (CPI) unless a mutually agreed upon rate increase is established. Such an increase shall not exceed 4% per year. This letter is to inform the city that current rates in the contract will be escalated using the current 3.5% CPI and will become effective on November p t 2026. The new rates for the amendment are as follows:

CLASSIFICATION HOURLY BILLING RATE
Bui lding Safety Services
Senior Plan Review Engineer ............ ..................... ...... .................................... ................................... ............... $161 Senior Plans Examiner ................................................... ..................................................................................... $122 CASp ............................................. .......................................................................................................................... $134 Fire Prevention Engineer ............................................................ ........................... ............ ...... ............ ... ........... $161 Fire Plans Examiner/ Fire Inspector .................. ............... ........................... ...... ............................................. $122 Building Inspector ............................................................ ......... ......................................................................... $106 Administrative Support ............... ... ............................................................................................. ............ ... .......... $83 Certified Building Official .................................................................................................................................. $176 Licensed Plan Review Engineer (structural, civil, electrical, mechanical)/ Architect .......................... $171 Su p e rv i s i n g St r u ct u r a I E n g i n e e r ......... ............................................................................................................... $ 213 Senior Structural Engineer .......................................... ... ......... .......................................................................... $198 Permit Technician ................................................................................................................................................. $86 Senior Fire Plans Examiner ......... .................................................................................................................. ...... $144 Fire Marshall ...................................................................................................... .............................................. ..... $132 ICC Building Plans Examiner .................. ...... ...... .................. ...... ............... ............ ............ .................................. $134 Senior Code Enforcement Officer ........................ ............... ...... ..................... ... .................. ... ........................ .. $149 Code Enforcement Officer ... ............ ...................................................... ......... ... ...... .......................................... $139 Please contact Devin Locke at [email protected] or 949-889-5270 should you have any questions. Or feel free to contact me directly at whayes@interwestgrp .com or 909-568-9749 Sincerely,
Bill Hayes, Director of Building Department Services - Southern CA

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ':i ~ day of ~~- , 2018 (the effective date) by and between _The City of Reedley, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and lnterwest Consulting Group Inc., hereafter referred to as "INTERWEST", IN CONSIDERATION of the covenants to hereinafter set forth, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows:

ARTICLE 1

SCOPE OF SERVICES

1.1 Description of Services
The term of this agreement shall begin on the effective date, and shall end on June 30, 2020. INTERWEST shall perform general building department services including plan review, building inspection and other related services as directed by the and on behalf of the CITY as identified in the attached EXHIBIT "A" Scope of Services.

1.2 Schedule of Work
Upon receipt of written Notice to Proceed from CITY, I NTERWEST shall perform with due diligence the services requested by the CITY and agreed to by INTERWEST.

Fees .

2.1 Payment Address
ARTICLE 2

COMPENSATION
All payments due INTERWEST shall be paid to :
lnterwest Consulting Group Inc.
1171 W. Shaw Avenue, Suite 102
Fresno, CA 93711

2.2 Terms of Compensation
Terms of compensation are as stipulated in the attached EXHIBIT "B" Project INTERWEST will submit invoices monthly for the work completed in the previous month. INTERWEST shall perform such services and be paid for such services in accordance with the fees for services identified in the Proposal for Professional Building Official, Plan Check and Building Inspection Services on an As-Needed Basis.

All invoices for services are considered to be due and payable upon receipt unless otherwise set forth in this Agreement. It is mutually agreed that payment to INTERWEST shall not be delayed for any reason during the execution of the scope of services . This would also include final payment upon completion of the scope of services by INTERWEST. Withholding of payment shall only be for cause and shall be as set forth in writing by the client within 10 calendar days of receipt of the invoice. Invoices not

contested within 10 calendar days are assumed to be accurate and acceptable to all parties, and all rights to withhold payment shall be forfeited after that time.

Each invoice will represent services completed during the prior month unless otherwise noted on the invoice. Payment not received within 30 days of the invoice date will be considered past due. All past due invoices will be subject to a 1.5 % per month late charge. If the invoice, including late charges due, is not paid in full within 60 days of the invoice date, INTERWEST may cease all services on the project and may commence the exercising of its legal remedies. These include, but are not limited to, mechanics' lien rights under applicable law.

ARTICLE 3

INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE

3.1 Indemnification
INTERWEST will indemnify and hold harmless CITY, Its Boards and its officers and employees (collectively "CITY"), against any claim , loss or liability that CITY incurs to the extent caused by the negligent acts , errors or omissions of INTERWEST, its agents, officers, directors and employees, in performing any of the services under this Agreement.

In recognition of the relative risks and benefits of the services provided to both the CITY and INTERWEST, these risks have been allocated such that the CITY agrees , to the fullest extent permitted by law, to specific limits of liability. The aggregate limits of liability of INTERWEST, its agents, officers, directors and employees in performing any of the services under this Agreement arising from any and all cause or causes shall not exceed $50,000. It is intended that this limitation apply to any and all liability or cause of action however alleged or arising, unless prohibited by law.

3.2 GaneraLU abilitv
INTERWEST shall at all times during term of the Agreement carry, maintain, and keep in full force and effect, a policy or policies of Comprehensive General Liability Insurance, with minimum limits of One Million ($1,000,000.00) Dollars for each occurrence and in the aggregate , combined single limit, against any personal injury, death, loss or damage resulting from the wrongful or negligent acts by INTERWEST.

Said policy or policies shall be issued by an insurer admitted to do business in the State of California and rated in Best's Insurance Guide with a rating of B++ or better.

3.3 Professional Liability
INTERWEST shall at all times during the term of this Agreement, carry , maintain, and keep in full force and effect a policy or policies of professional liability insurance with a minimum limit of one million ($1,000,000.00) dollars. Said policy or policies shall be issued by an insurer admitted to do business in the State of California and rated in Best's Insurance Guide with a rating of B++ or better.

3.4 Worker's Compensation
INTERWEST agrees to maintain in force at all times during the performance of work under this Agreement worker's compensation insurance as required by the law.

INTERWEST shall require any subcontractor similarly to provide such compensation insurance for their respective employees.

3.5 Certificate of Insurance
Upon execution of this Agreement, INTERWEST shall send the CITY a certificate of insurance showing that the aforesaid policies are in effect in the required amount. At all times during the term of this agreement, lnterwest shall maintain on file with the CITY Clerk a certificate of insurance showing that the aforesaid policies are in effect in the required amounts. The comprehensive general liability policy shall include the CITY, its officers, and employees as additional insured.

ARTICLE 4

TERMINATION

4.1 Termination of Agreement
(a) This Agreement may be terminated at any time, with or without cause, by either party upon sixty (60) days prior written notice. (b) In the event of termination or cancellation of this Agreement by INTERWEST or CITY, due to no fault or failure of performance by INTERWEST, INTERWEST shall be paid compensation for all services performed by INTERWEST, in an amount to be determined as follows; for work done in accordance with all of the terms and provisions of this Agreement, INTERWEST shall be paid an amount equal to the percentage of services performed prior to the effective date of termination or cancellation in accordance with the work items; provided in no event shall the amount which would have been paid to INTERWEST for the full performance of the services.

ARTICLE 5

OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS

5.1 OwnershiQ of Documents and Work Product
All plans, specifications , reports and other design documents prepared by INTERWEST pursuant to this Agreement are instruments of service, which shall be deemed the property of the CITY. CITY acknowledges and agrees that all plans , specifications, reports and other design documents prepared by INTERWEST pursuant to this Agreement shall be used exclusively on this Project and shall not be used for any other work without the written consent of INTERWEST. In the event CITY and INTERWEST permit the reuse or other use of the plans , specifications , reports or other design documents, CITY shall require the party using them to indemnify and hold harmless INTERWEST regarding any and all references to INTERWEST from the plans , specifications, reports and other design documents .

ARTICLE 6

GENERAL PROVISIONS

6.1 Fair Employment Practices/Equal Opportunity Acts
In the performance of this Agreement, INTERWEST shall comply with all applicable provisions of the California Fair Employment Practices Act (California Government Code Sections 12940-48) and the applicable equal employment provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 200e-217), and the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. § 11200, et seq.).

6.2 Legal Action
(a) Should either party to this Agreement bring legal action against the other, the case shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in Orange County, California, and the party prevailing in such action shall be entitled to recover its costs of litigation, including reasonable attorneys' fee which shall be fixed by the judge hearing the case and such fee shall be included in the judgment. (b) Should any legal action about the Project between CITY and a party other than INTERWEST require the testimony of INTERWEST when there is no allegation that INTERWEST was negligent, CITY shall compensate INTERWEST for its testimony and preparation to testify at the hourly rates in effect at the time of such testimony.

6.3 Assignment
This Agreement shall not be assignable by either party without the prior written consent of the other party.

Notwithstanding the above, INTERWEST may use the services of persons and entities not in INTERWEST'S direct employ , when it is appropriate and customary to do so. Such persons and entities include, but are not necessarily limited to specialized consultants.

6.8 Hazardous Materials
Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, INTERWEST and its subconsultants and/or contractors shall have no responsibility for the discovery, presence, handling, removal or disposal of, or exposure of persons to hazardous materials in any form at the site of the Project.

6.9 Titles
The titles used in this Agreement are for general reference only and are not part of the Agreement.

6.10 Extent of Agreement
This Agreement represents the entire and integrated Agreement between CITY and INTERWEST and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations or agreements , either written or oral. This Agreement may be modified or amended only by a subsequent written agreement signed by both parties.

6.11 Notices
All notice pertaining to this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed as follows :

If to INTERWEST:

Mr. Ron Beehler
lnterwest Consulting Group Inc.
11613 Santa Clara Drive, Suite 100
Roseville, CA 95661
If to CITY:

Mr. Gary Higginbotham
Building Official
City of Reedley
1733 9th Street
Reedley, CA 93654
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement of the date and year first above written.
lnterwes·t. ,~_;; ~1ulting .. .fo.(_~olfp,--l;yb. City of ·R~. ed-ley /1 ! / -/ ~\ - •' J ' / 1/
By. / t~ i:/ .J ) ~--- sv- . ~ I l . · d ft';' .,1_ --~ - - - ~, ~ i. l\ .J >· __.,,,. ~ on Beehl~ ----• .·J~ - 1i • ( J 11·~c' (, I Title: Director Title: ./'· f,,1 { LV '-~c Dated. cJ · --z --. - ..,,....... Dated·. ( I ~/ '.f : ~ f / . r. ) ' } U / ;:'_; J I -I}__ 1 • '

Plan Processing Requirements

EXHIBIT- A

SCOPE OF SERVICES
Upon receipt of plans and docurnents for review and approval including OSHPD3 plan review projects, lnterwest will develop and furnish the Building Official with a complete and legible correction list for each plan review. When plans are deemed complete and in full code compliance, 2 sets of plans and corresponding documents will be stamped with lnterwest Consulting Group's approval stamp and signed by our plans examiners. Both sets of completed documents will be returned to the county for final approval and distribution to the applicant.

All construction plans and other related documents will be reviewed for compliance with the following codes:
✓ Architectural - Latest City Adopted Building and Residential Codes ✓ Structural - Latest City Adopted Building and Residential Codes ✓ Electrical - Latest City Adopted Electrical Code
✓ Plumbing - Latest City Adopted Plumbing Code
✓ Mechanical - Latest City Adopted Mechanical Code
✓ Fire - Latest City Adopted Fire Code
✓ Energy- Latest County Adopted Title 24 Energy Code
✓ Accessibility- Latest City Adopted Title 24 Accessibility Codes (State and Federal) ✓ Green Building - Latest City Adopted Green Building Code ✓ Other City Ordinances, Policies, Procedures
Time of Performance
lnterwest Consulting Group understands the need for prompt and timely services and works hard to accommodate any turn around schedule desired by our clients. Our typical turn-around is ten {10) working days for first reviews and five (5) working days for subsequent reviews. We propose plan review turn-around times for large and/or complex projects be within 15 working days for the first review and 10 working days for subsequent reviews as agreed to1 based on the complexity of the project.

The turn-around time for plan reviews will begin the day the documents are received in our office. lnterwest Consulting Group will also accommodate special project plan review needs1 such as fast-track or expedited reviews and phased plan reviews as agreed to, based on the complexity of the project and availability of staff.

Building Inspection Services
lnterwest Consulting Group's staff of ICC certified inspectors has performed inspection services on a wide variety of construction projects including many large custom homes, new residential developments1 commercial buildings1 essential service buildings and industrial projects such as power plants and electrical wind turbines. When necessary for large or fast-track projects, multiple inspectors are available .

All inspection personnel provided for services will be ICC and/or CASp certified as required. Our inspectors are able to read , understand and interpret co nstruction documents, truss drawings and calculations, prepare and maintain accurate records and reports, communicate effectively orally and in writing and work effectively with contractors, th e public and county staff. Inspectors will possess knowledge of modern methods of construction, materials, tools and safety procedures utilized fo r building inspection .

Inspections performed by lnterwest Consulting Group' s inspectors will be performed in accordance with the City's adopted version of the California Building Code, California Residential Code, California Green Building Code, California Mechanical Code, California Plumbing Cod e and the California Electrical Code.

Projects will also be inspected for conformance with the accessibility, noise and energy conservation requirements as mandated by State of California Title 24 and all applicable ordinances. lnterwest Consulting Group's inspectors will inspect projects for conformance with approved drawings and specifications which will include review of the permit documents to verify that onsite conditions are consistent with the approved documents for square footage, setbacks, heights and any other applicable conditions. At the completion of inspections, lnterwest Consulting Group's inspectors will complete all necessary City forms and documentation as required to provide seamless service. lnterwest's inspection staff will report directly to the Building Official or other City designated person .

Fees for Services

EXHIBIT- B

FEES FOR SERVICES
lnterwest Consulting Group proposes the following fees for the various plan review and building inspection services:
✓ Complete plan review services - 75% of the plan review fee per the current fee schedule adopted by the City
✓ Structural only plan review services -50% of the plan review fee per the current fee schedule adopted by the City
✓ OSHPD3 plan review services - Hourly fee using the Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates below ✓ CASp plan review services - Hourly fee using the Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates below ✓ CASp inspection services - Hourly fee using the Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates below ✓ Fire plan review services - Hourly fee using the Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates Below ✓ Partial Reviews1 preliminary reviews, foundation only, revisions to approved drawings, deferred submittals1 etc. - Hourly fee using the Schedule of Hourly Rates Below ✓ Special Projects - Fees for special projects such as expedited projects1 very large projects or city owned projects can be negotiated on a project by project basis. ✓ There is no charge for courier or shipping services
✓ Building inspection services - Hourly fee using the Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates below Schedule of Hourly Billing Rates

CLASSIFICATION HOURLY BILLING RATE
Senior Plan Review Engineer, .... ,, .. . ,,.,,,,,,., ... .,,. .. "'.,.,, ,,,,, .. ,.,,. ... ,, .... .. ...... ............... ,.,,, .. ,, . $135 Senior Plans Examiner, . .,, ... ,.,., .. ,,,,,,,.,..,,,.,,.,., . .,,,,. ... ,, ... , ... ., ....... ,,,,, . .,,,., ... ,, ...... ,., . ., ... ,.,, ... 95 CASp Plans Examiner/ Inspector .,, . ..,,. ................. ,., .... , .............. ,, ...... ... -..•....................... 95 Fire Prevention Engineer ....... , ........ ,. ... , ...... ,, .... , ........... ,-.................. , ... ..... ..... ~ ........ ....... 135 Fire Plans Examiner .. .... .,., .. ,, .. , .. ., .. , .. .. , .... .......... , ...... .. .. .......... , ... , ......... ,, ..... .......... ,, .. ... ,, ....... 95 Building Inspections , .. ........................ .. ......................... a , , . .......... . ..... .. ... .c .......... .. . ... m • . •• , 88 Aministrative Support , .... .. .. , ...... ,., ..... ,., ........................ ,_ ........................ .................. .. , ....... 60 Miscellaneous charges will include:

Mileage While Performing City Services ..... """"''""" ..... , Current I RS Vehicle Mileage Rate Invoices for plan review projects are typically generated upon the conclusion of the first review. Hourly services are invoiced monthly. Mileage for personal vehicle use within the City will be charged at the current IRS vehicle mileage rate . lnterwest Consulting Group will work with the City to supply all necessary billing information.

DATE:

TITLE:

SUBMITTED:

APPROVED:

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
~ Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEMNO: b
July 28, 2026
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-047 APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 CLAIMS FOR MEASURE C LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS

FROM THE FRESNO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
Marilu S. Morales, P.E. \. ~ }A
City Engineer ._)"'
Nicole R. Zieba
City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-047 approving and accepting the City of Reedley annual claims for Measure C Extension Local Agency Pass-Through Transportation Funds for Fiscal Year (FY) 2026-2027 and authorizing the City Engineer to sign and submit each subprogram claim to the Fresno County Transportation Authority.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At its June 10, 2026, board meeting the Fresno County Transportation Authority (FCTA) approved the City of Reedley apportionment for the FY 2026-2027 Measure C Extension anticipated revenues as shown in the attached certification and claim forms for each of the eligible subprograms under the Measure C Extension.

The City of Reedley's apportionment for FY 2026-2027 is $955,463 based upon a formula calculation using the City's 2026 population estimates per the California Department of Finance and the 2024 road miles per Caltrans Maintained Public Road Data Report. Distributions of the FY 2026-2027 Measure C Extension funds collected by FCTA will be made to the City in monthly payments based on the percentage set forth on the form for each subprogram. The City will use funds from the street maintenance, ADA compliance, flexible funding, pedestrian/trail and bicycle facility programs as matching funds for various projects. The street maintenance funds will also be used by the City to perform various maintenance projects including slurry seals, overlays, etc.

Also, in accordance with this claim, the City is certifying that these funds will not be used to substitute for property tax funds and that generally acceptable accounting principles will be followed to manage and spend these funds on eligible transportation projects and programs. Furthermore, with the acceptance of this claim, the City commits to submit the prior fiscal years Measure C Extension expenditures, FY 2025- 2026, to the Fresno County Transportation Authority no later than November 15, 2026.

FISCAL IMPACT
The City's allocation for FY 2026-2027 is an estimated $955,463. These funds will be allocated to the City of Reedley per the following listed subprograms:

Street Maintenance
ADA Compliance
Flexible Funding
Pedestrian/Trail Rural
Bicycle Facilities
$419,829
$ 14,694
$405,135
$ 92,996
$ 22,810
All values shown above were taken directly from the documents provided by the FCT A.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2026-04 7

2. Local Transportation Program Certifications and Claim Forms a. Street Maintenance Subprogram
b. ADA Compliance Subprogram
c. Flexible Funding Subprogram
d. Pedestrian/Trail Rural Subprogram
e. Bicycle Facilities Subprogram

3. FCTA Resolution and Apportionment Calculations

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-047

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY APPROVING AND ACCEPTING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 CLAIMS

FOR MEASURE C LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS FROM THE

FRESNO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Reedley has received information and a staff report from the City Engineer regarding the Measure C Extension Local Transportation Program Funds; and
WHEREAS, The Fresno County Transportation Authority is the administrator of the Retail Transactions and Use Tax (1 /2 percent) Funds collected pursuant to the Fresno County Transportation Improvement Act as provided by Part 1.6 (commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code and Public Utilities Code Sections 142000, et seq.; and
WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code Section 142257 provides that the 2006 Measure C Extension Expenditure Plan, which was approved prior to and provided the basis for the ballot measure considered by the voters at the November 7, 2006 election, shall specify the amount and the formula by which the retail transactions and use tax shall be allocated to each city and the County for Local Transportation Purposes determined to be priority projects by local governments to which funds are allocated; and WHEREAS, the 2006 Measure C Extension Expenditure Plan creates a number of transportation programs to be funded by participating jurisdictions with Measure C funds passed-through from the Authority to the City of Reedley when submitting eligible project claims; and
WHEREAS, the City of Reedley's 2026 population was determined at 26,845 per the California Department of Finance; and
WHEREAS, the City of Reedley is not exempt from restricting a portion of its FY 2026-2027 allocation for the use of Pedestrian/Trail and Bicycle Facilities Subprograms based on the 25,000 population threshold; and
WHEREAS, the City of Reedley intends to complete and submit the reporting requirements for the prior fiscal years Measure C Extension expenditures no later than November 15, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City of Reedley certifies that these funds will not be used to substitute for property tax funds and that generally accepted accounting principles will be followed to assure this and to identify the projects for which the funds are spent; and WHEREAS, the City of Reedley's allocation based on population and road miles is represented as $955,463 or 2.24% of the expected Measure C sales tax revenues for FY 2026-2027; and
WHEREAS, the City of Reedley has been apportioned the amounts indicated for each of the subprograms below:

1. Street Maintenance

2. ADA Compliance

3. Flexible Funding

4. Pedestrian/Trail Rural

5. Bicycle Facilities
$419,829
$ 14,694
$405,135
$ 92,996
$ 22,81 O; and
WHEREAS, the City of Reedley anticipates receipt of said subprogram amounts upon proper submittal of the certification and claims forms; and WHEREAS, the City Council on July 28, 2026 at a public meeting received a written staff report, invited public comment, and independently deliberated; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Reedley, using their independent judgment, hereby approves and accepts the apportionments for each of the five subprograms listed above based on the following:

1. The above recitals are true and correct.

2. The City Council finds that the Measure C allocations will provide a benefit to the surface transportation system of the City.

3. The City Council authorizes the City Engineer to sign the claim forms on behalf of the City.

4. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption.

This foregoing resolution is hereby approved and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Reedley held on 28th day of July, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

ATTEST: Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
Resolution No. 2026-047

MEASURE C EXTENSION

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PASS THROUGH REVENUES
CERTIFICATION AND CLAIM FOR FY2026-2027
TO: Fresno County Transportation Authority
FROM: City of Reedley
Local Agency Name
Address:845 G Street Reedley, CA 93654 Contact: Marilu Morales Telephone: (559) 637-4200 FAX: (559) 637-2257 Email Address: [email protected]

1. Applicable Funding Program: (Check One)
Regional Public Transit Program Local Transportation Program • Fresno Area Express rgi Street Maintenance
• Clovis Transit • ADA Compliance
• FCRTA • Flexible Funding
• PTIS/Transit Consolidation • Pedestrian/Trails Urban
• ADA/Seniors/Paratransit • Pedestrian/Trails Rural
• Farmworker Van Pools • Bicycle Facilities
• Car/Van Pools Regional Transportation Program
• New Technology Reserve • Fresno Airports
Alternative Transportation Program
• Rail Consolidation Subprogram
Environmental Enhancement Program
• School Bus Replacement
• Transit Oriented Infrastructure for
In-Fill
Administrative/Planning Program
• Fresno COG

2. The City of Reedley ("claimant") is an eligible claimant of funds for local transportation purposes pursuant to Local Agency Name
California Public Utilities Code Section 142257.

3. The Fresno County Transportation Authority has adopted a Resolution of Apportionment for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 setting 2.43% of $17,292,782 (or $419,829) for the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above and available to the claimant. On behalf of claimant, I hereby request release of the funds to claimant in accordance with:
(a) Monthly payments consistent with adopted percentage, based on actual receipts (b) Compliance with Steps A and B of the Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) - Local Agency Pass-Through Funding programs and Other Revenue Program Funding

4. On behalf of claimant, I hereby certify as follows:
(a) That the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above are not being used to substitute for property tax funds which claimant had previously used for local transportation purposes. Such substitution of property tax funds is prohibited by California Public Utilities Code Section 142257. (b) That claimant has segregated property tax revenues from claimant's other general fund revenues used to support the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above so that verification of non-substitution can be proved through audit Qr that the non-substitution of funds shall apply to claimant's entire general fund. (c) That claimant shall account for Subprogram or Category of funds checked above and received pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 142257. Claimant shall maintain current records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall separately record expenditures for each type of eligible purpose.

Claimant shall make such records available to the Authority for inspection or audit at any time.

5. Claimant understands that should financial or compliance audit exceptions be found, the Fresno County Transportation Authority will take immediate steps to resolve the exceptions in accordance with its adopted procedures. The Authority shall immediately notify the Fresno County Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector to withhold allocation of funds to claimants until the exceptions are resolved or the outstanding financial or compliance audits are submitted and resolved.

Authorized Signature:

Title: City Engineer
Date:

ATTACHMENT: Evidence of Formal Action for Approval and Submittal Approved by: Fresno County Transportation Authority Board on: ________ _ Measure C Extension Strategic Implementation Plan - Appendix D

MEASURE C EXTENSION

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PASS THROUGH REVENUES
CERTIFICATION AND CLAIM FOR FY2026-2027
TO:

FROM:

Fresno County Transportation Authority
City of Reedley
Local Agency Name
Address:845 G Street, Reedley, CA 93654 Contact: Marilu Morales Telephone: (559) 637-4200 FAX: (559) 637-2257 Email Address: [email protected]

1. Applicable Funding Program: (Check One)
Regional Public Transit Program Local Transportation Program • Fresno Area Express • Street Maintenance
• Clovis Transit rgi ADA Compliance
• FCRTA • Flexible Funding
• PTIS/Transit Consolidation • Pedestrian/Trails Urban
• ADA/Seniors/Paratransit • Pedestrian/Trails Rural
• Farmworker Van Pools • Bicycle Facilities
• Car/Van Pools Regional Transportation Program
• New Technology Reserve • Fresno Airports
Alternative Transportation Program
• Rail Consolidation Subprogram
Environmental Enhancement Program
• School Bus Replacement
• Transit Oriented Infrastructure for
In-Fill
Administrative/Planning Program
• Fresno COG

2. The City of Reedley ("claimant'1) is an eligible claimant of funds for local transportation purposes pursuant to Local Agency Name
California Public Utilities Code Section 142257.

3. The Fresno County Transportation Authority has adopted a Resolution of Apportionment for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 setting 2.43% of $605249 ( or $14,694) for the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above and available to the claimant. On behalf of claimant, I hereby request release of the funds to claimant in accordance with:
(a) Monthly payments consistent with adopted percentage, based on actual receipts (b) Compliance with Steps A and B of the Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) - Local Agency Pass-Through Funding programs and Other Revenue Program Funding

4. On behalf of claimant, I hereby certify as follows:
(a) That the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above are not being used to substitute for property tax funds which claimant had previously used for local transportation purposes. Such substitution of property tax funds is prohibited by California Public Utilities Code Section 142257. (b) That claimant has segregated property tax revenues from claimant's other general fund revenues used to support the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above so that verification of non-substitution can be proved through audit QI that the non-substitution of funds shall apply to claimant's entire general fund. (c) That claimant shall account for Subprogram or Category of funds checked above and received pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 142257. Claimant shall maintain current records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall separately record expenditures for each type of eligible purpose.

Claimant shall make such records available to the Authority for inspection or audit at any time.

5. Claimant understands that should financial or compliance audit exceptions be found, the Fresno County Transportation Authority will take immediate steps to resolve the exceptions in accordance with its adopted procedures. The Authority shall immediately notify the Fresno County Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector to withhold allocation of funds to claimants until the exceptions are resolved or the outstanding financial or compliance audits are submitted and resolved .

Authorized Signature:

Title: City Engineer
Date:

ATTACHMENT: Evidence of Formal Action for Approval and Submittal Approved by: Fresno County Transportation Authority Board on: _________ _ Measure C Extension Strategic Implementation Plan - Appendix D

MEASURE C EXTENSION

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PASS THROUGH REVENUES
CERTIFICATION AND CLAIM FOR FY2026-2027
TO: Fresno County Transportation Authority
FROM: City of Reedley
Local Agency Name
Address:845 G Street, Reedley, CA 93654 Contact: Marilu Morales Telephone: (559} 637-4200 FAX: (559} 637-2257 Email Address: marilu [email protected]

1. Applicable Funding Program: (Check One)
Regional Public Transit Program Local Transportation Program • Fresno Area Express • Street Maintenance
• Clovis Transit • ADA Compliance
• FCRTA ~ Flexible Funding
• PTIS/Transit Consolidation • Pedestrian/Trails Urban
• ADA/Seniors/Paratransit • Pedestrian/Trails Rural
• Farmworker Van Pools • Bicycle Facilities
• Car/Van Pools Regional Transportation Program
• New Technology Reserve • Fresno Airports
Alternative Transportation Program
• Rail Consolidation Subprogram
Environmental Enhancement Program
• School Bus Replacement
• Transit Oriented Infrastructure for
In-Fill
Administrative/Planning Program
• Fresno COG

2. The City of Reedley ("claimant") is an eligible claimant of funds for local transportation purposes pursuant to Local Agency Name
California Public Utilities Code Section 142257.

3. The Fresno County Transportation Authority has adopted a Resolution of Apportionment for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 setting 2.34% of $17,281,604 (or $405,135) for the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above and available to the claimant. On behalf of claimant, I hereby request release of the funds to claimant in accordance with:
(a) Monthly payments consistent with adopted percentage, based on actual receipts (b) Compliance with Steps A and B of the Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) - Local Agency Pass-Through Funding programs and Other Revenue Program Funding

4. On behalf of claimant, I hereby certify as follows:
(a) That the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above are not being used to substitute for property tax funds which claimant had previously used for local transportation purposes. Such substitution of property tax funds is prohibited by California Public Utilities Code Section 142257. (b) That claimant has segregated property tax revenues from claimant's other general fund revenues used to support the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above so that verification of non-substitution can be proved through audit QI that the non-substitution of funds shall apply to claimant1s entire general fund. (c) That claimant shall account for Subprogram or Category of funds checked above and received pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 142257. Claimant shall maintain current records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall separately record expenditures for each type of eligible purpose.

Claimant shall make such records available to the Authority for inspection or audit at any time.

5. Claimant understands that should financial or compliance audit exceptions be found, the Fresno County Transportation Authority will take immediate steps to resolve the exceptions in accordance with its adopted procedures. The Authority shall immediately notify the Fresno County Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector to withhold allocation of funds to claimants until the exceptions are resolved or the outstanding financial or compliance audits are submitted and resolved .

Authorized Signature:

Title: City Engineer
Date:

ATTACHMENT: Evidence of Formal Action for Approval and Submittal Approved by: Fresno County Transportation Authority Board on: ________ _ Measure C Extension Strategic Implementation Plan - Appendix D

MEASURE C EXTENSION

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PASS THROUGH REVENUES
CERTIFICATION AND CLAIM FOR FY2026-2027
TO:

FROM:

Fresno County Transportation Authority
City of Reedley
Local Agency Name
Address:845 G Street, Reedley, CA 93654 Contact: Marilu Morales Telephone: (559) 637-4200 FAX: (559) 637-2257 Email Address: [email protected]

1. Applicable Funding Program: (Check One)
Regional Public Transit Program Local Transportation Program • Fresno Area Express • Street Maintenance
• Clovis Transit • ADA Compliance
• FCRTA • Flexible Funding
• PTIS/Transit Consolidation • Pedestrian/Trails Urban
• ADA/Seniors/Paratransit rgJ Pedestrian/Trails Rural
• Farmworker Van Pools • Bicycle Facilities
• Car/Van Pools Regional Transportation Program
• New Technology Reserve • Fresno Airports
Alternative Transportation Program
• Rail Consolidation Subprogram
Environmental Enhancement Program
• School Bus Replacement
• Transit Oriented Infrastructure for
In-Fill
Administrative/Planning Program
• Fresno COG

2. The City of Reedley ("claimant'1) is an eligible claimant of funds for local transportation purposes pursuant to Local Agency Name
California Public Utilities Code Section 142257.

3. The Fresno County Transportation Authority has adopted a Resolution of Apportionment for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 setting 15.57% of $597,410 (or $92,996) for the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above and available to the claimant. On behalf of claimant, I hereby request release of the funds to claimant in accordance with :
(a) Monthly payments consistent with adopted percentage, based on actual receipts (b) Compliance with Steps A and B of the Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) - Local Agency Pass-Through Funding programs and Other Revenue Program Funding

4. On behalf of claimant, I hereby certify as follows:
(a) That the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above are not being used to substitute for property tax funds which claimant had previously used for local transportation purposes. Such substitution of property tax funds is prohibited by California Public Utilities Code Section 142257. (b) That claimant has segregated property tax revenues from claimant's other general fund revenues used to support the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above so that verification of non-substitution can be proved through audit QI that the non-substitution of funds shall apply to claimant's entire general fund. (c) That claimant shall account for Subprogram or Category of funds checked above and received pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 142257. Claimant shall maintain current records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall separately record expenditures for each type of eligible purpose.

Claimant shall make such records available to the Authority for inspection or audit at any time.

5. Claimant understands that should financial or compliance audit exceptions be found, the Fresno County Transportation Authority will take immediate steps to resolve the exceptions in accordance with its adopted procedures. The Authority shall immediately notify the Fresno County Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector to withhold allocation of funds to claimants until the exceptions are resolved or the outstanding financial or compliance audits are submitted and resolved.

Authorized Signature:

Title: City Engineer
Date:

ATTACHMENT: Evidence of Formal Action for Approval and Submittal Approved by: Fresno County Transportation Authority Board on: _______ _ _ Measure C Extension Strategic Implementation Plan - Appendix D

MEASURE C EXTENSION

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION PASS THROUGH REVENUES
CERTIFICATION AND CLAIM FOR FY2026-2027
TO: Fresno County Transportation Authority
FROM: City of Reedley
Local Agency Name
Address:845 G Street, Reedley 1 CA 93654 Contact: Marilu Morales Telephone: (559) 637-4200 FAX: (559) 637-2257 Email Address: [email protected]

1. Applicable Funding Program: (Check One)
Regional Public Transit Program Local Transportation Program • Fresno Area Express • Street Maintenance
• Clovis Transit • ADA Compliance
• FCRT A • Flexible Funding
• PTIS/Transit Consolidation • Pedestrian/Trails Urban
• ADA/Seniors/Paratransit • Pedestrian/Trails Rural
• Farmworker Van Pools r8l Bicycle Facilities
• Car/Van Pools Regional Transportation Program
• New Technology Reserve • Fresno Airports
Alternative Transportation Program
• Rail Consolidation Subprogram
Environmental Enhancement Program
• School Bus Replacement
• Transit Oriented Infrastructure for
In-Fill
Administrative/Planning Program
• Fresno COG

2. The City of Reedley ("claimant") is an eligible claimant of funds for local transportation purposes pursuant to Local Agency Name
California Public Utilities Code Section 142257.

3. The Fresno County Transportation Authority has adopted a Resolution of Apportionment for Fiscal Year 2026-2027 setting 2.54% of $899.4 76 ( or $22,810) for the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above and available to the claimant. On behalf of claimant, I hereby request release of the funds to claimant in accordance with:
(a) Monthly payments consistent with adopted percentage, based on actual receipts (b) Compliance with Steps A and B of the Strategic Implementation Plan (SIP) - Local Agency Pass-Through Funding programs and Other Revenue Program Funding

4. On behalf of claimant, I hereby certify as follows:
(a) That the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above are not being used to substitute for property tax funds which claimant had previously used for local transportation purposes. Such substitution of property tax funds is prohibited by California Public Utilities Code Section 142257. (b) That claimant has segregated property tax revenues from claimant's other general fund revenues used to support the Subprogram or Category of funds checked above so that verification of non-substitution can be proved through audit QI that the non-substitution of funds shall apply to claimant's entire general fund. (c) That claimant shall account for Subprogram or Category of funds checked above and received pursuant to Public Utilities Code Section 142257. Claimant shall maintain current records in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall separately record expenditures for each type of eligible purpose.

Claimant shall make such records available to the Authority for inspection or audit at any time.

5. Claimant understands that should financial or compliance audit exceptions be found, the Fresno County Transportation Authority will take immediate steps to resolve the exceptions in accordance with its adopted procedures. The Authority shall immediately notify the Fresno County Auditor-Controller/Treasurer-Tax Collector to withhold allocation of funds to claimants until the exceptions are resolved or the outstanding financial or compliance audits are submitted and resolved.

Authorized Signature:

Title: City Engineer
Date:

ATTACHMENT: Evidence of Formal Action for Approval and Submittal Approved by: Fresno County Transportation Authority Board on: _____ ___ _ Measure C Extension Strategic Implementation Plan - Appendix D

BEFORE THE

FRESNO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD
RESOLUTION NO 2026-01
In the Matter of: )

FRESNO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION )

IMPROVEMENT ACT )

CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES )
CODE SECTION 142257 )
)
)

RETAIL TRANSACTIONS AND USE

TAX FUNDS FOR EXTENSION

LOCAL TRANSPORTATION

PURPOSES PASS-THROUGH

PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS FOR
FY 2026-27
WHEREAS, the Fresno County Transportation Authority is the administrator of the Retail Transactions and Use Tax (1/2 cent) Funds collected pursuant to the Fresno County Transportation Improvement Act as provided by Part 1.6 ( commencing with Section 7251) of Division 2 of the Revenue and Taxation Code and Public Utilities Code Sections 142000, et seq.,
WHEREAS, California Public Utilities Code Section 142257 provides that the 2006 Measure C Extension Expenditure Plan, which was approved prior to and provided the basis for the ballot measure considered by the voters at the November 7, 2006, election, shall specify the amount and the formula by which the retail transactions and use tax shall be allocated to each participating jurisdiction for Measure C Extension Program and Project Funds Local Transportation Purposes determined to be priority projects by local governments to which funds are allocated, and
WHEREAS, the 2006 Measure C Extension Expenditure Plan creates a number of transportation programs to be funded by participating jurisdictions with Measure C funds passed through from the Authority to the jurisdiction submitting eligible project claims, and WHEREAS, these various programs have differing requirements, exemptions, and formulas for calculating pass-through funding levels, and WHEREAS, the programs and subprograms identified below are eligible for passthrough funding, Regional Public Transit Program
Public Transit Agencies
Public Transportation Infrastructure Study (PTIS)
ADA/Seniors/Paratransit
Ag-worker/Car/Van Pools
Local Transportation Program
Local Allocation
Pedestrian/Trails
Bicycle Facilities

and
Regional Transportation Program
Fresno Airports
Administration/Planning Program
Council of Fresno County Governments
WHEREAS, the program requirements and exemptions for these programs may change from time to time as local jurisdiction population changes or mandated programs are satisfied, and
WHEREAS, in an effort to fully explain the various program provisions, the Authority, together with the Fresno Council of Governments, created and will update as needed the Measure C Extension Strategic Implementation Plan which among other things discusses each pass-through program in detail and provides the basis for calculating passthrough funding levels for each program in the 2026-27 fiscal year, and WHEREAS, the Authority procedures for administration of funds for local transportation purposes as identified in the Measure C Extension Administrative Code calls for an annual Resolution of Apportionment to determine the percentage and amount of funds to be available within the forthcoming fiscal year, and
WHEREAS, the attached schedule of apportionment for FY 2026-27 is based upon the Measure C Extension Strategic Implementation Plan.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Fresno County Transportation Authority hereby approves the attached schedule of apportionment for FY 2026-27 as indicated in the Measure C Extension Strategic Implementation Plan, which schedule is hereby made a part of this resolution, and approves the allocations, to be distributed as they are received and in accordance with claims submitted by eligible claimants.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Fresno County Auditor-Controller/TreasurerTax Collector cause the revised Resolution of Apportionment to be paid in the manner and time directed by the Executive Director of the Fresno County Transportation Authority.

THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was passed and adopted by the Fresno County Transportation Authority Board the 10th day of June 2026.

A YES: Ashbeck, Beltran, Karbassi , Martinez, Mendes, Sihota, Westerlund NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT: Bredefeld, Dyer
VACANT:

ATTEST:

I hereby certify that the foregoing is a true
copy of a resolution of the Fresno County
Transportation Authority duly adopted at a
regular meeting thereof held on June 10, 2026.

SIGNED: L-~cK.lt?<J ~ ---
Moses Stites, Executive rnrector
SIGNED:

Fresno County Transportation Authority
/dd/reso/PassThru-Allocation-2026-01

Lynne
~~- Ashbeck, Chairperson
Fresno County Transp01iation Authority
Table 1
Measure C Sales Tax Revenue
2026/27
Approved by the FCT A Board 06/10/26
Sales Tax Estimate
Program Services and Supplies
Net Distributed Sales Tax Estimate
Funding Allocation Programs
Regional Public Transit Program
Public Transit Agencies
Fresno Area Express (FAX)
Clovis Transit
Fresno County Rural Transit Agency (FCRTA)
Publi~ Transportation lnfrastruct_ure Study (PTIS)
ADA I Seniors / Paratransit
Farmworker/ Car I Van Pools
Farmworker Van Pools
CarNan Pools
New Technology Reserve
Local Transportation Program
Local Allocation
Pedestrian/Trai Is
Urban (Fresno/Clovis)
Rural
Bicycle Facilities
Regional Transportation Program
Urban
Rural
Airports
Alternative Transportation Program
Grade Separation
Environmental Enhancement
School Bus Replacement
Transit Oriented Infrastructure for In-Fill
Administration/Planning Program
Fresno County Transportation Authority (FCTA)
Fresno Council of Governments (FCOG)
Total

Percent

13.70%

1.97%

3.99%

0.29%

0.79%

0.58%

0.58%

2.10%

30.60%

2.15%

0.95%

0.90%

14.70%

14.70%

1.00%

6.00%

2.30%

1.20%

1.00%

0.50%
100.00%
$113,956,920
$932,200
$113,024,720
Allocation
15,484,387
2,226,587
4,509,687
327,772
892,895
655,543
655,543
2,373,519
34,585,564
2,430,031
1,073,735
1,017,222
16,614,634
16,614,634
1,130,247
6,781,483
2,599,569
1,356,297
1,130,247
565,124
113,024,720
Table 2

FRESNO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

MEASURE C FUND APPORTIONMENT
Local Allocation Sub Program
FY2026/27
6/10/2026 Approved by the FCTA Board
Street ADA Flexible Ped/Trails Ped/Trails Bicycle
Maintenance Compliance Funding Urban Rural Facilities Total Clovis 1,858,408 10.75% 65,044 10.75% 1,793,364 10 .38% 431 ,357 17.75% 0 0.00% 111,537 12.40% 4,259,709 Coalinga 299,692 1.73% 10,489 1.73% 365,891 2.12% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 676,071 Firebaugh 171 ,927 0.99% 6,017 0.99% 204,154 1.18% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 382,097 Fowler 166,507 0.96% 5,828 0.96% 195,388 1.13% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 367,722 Fresno 7,808,890 45.16% 273 ,311 45.16% 7,535,579 43.60% 1,862,892 76.66% 0 0.00% 478 ,542 53.20% 17,959,213 Huron 140,709 0.81% 4,925 0.81% 165,240 0.96% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 310,874 Kerman 288,948 1.67% 10,113 1.67% 354,189 2.05% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 653,249 Kingsburg 242,313 1.40% 8,481 1.40% 291 ,930 1.69% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 542,723 Mendota 218,593 1.26% 7,651 1.26% 265,699 1.54% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 491,942 Orange Cove 182,505 1.06% 6,388 1.06% 217,815 1.26% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 406,707 Parlier 245,190 1.42% 8,582 1.42% 299,425 1.73% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 553,197 Reedley 419,829 2.43% 14,694 2.43% 405,135 2.34% 0 0.00% 92,996 15.57% 22,810 2.54% 955,463 San Joaquin 101,273 0.59% 3,545 0.59% 113,486 0.66% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 218,304 Sanger 433,930 2.51% 15,188 2.51% 418,742 2.42% 0 0.00% 94 ,930 15.89% 23,680 2.63% 986,470 Selma 401,423 2.32% 14,050 2.32% 493 ,865 2.86% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 0 0.00% 909,337 County of Fresno 4,312,651 24.94% 150,943 24.94% 4,161 ,708 24.08% 135,782 5.59% 409,484 68.54% 262,907 29.23% 9,433,474 17,292,782 605,249 17,281,604 2,430,031 597,410 899,476 39,106,552 39,106,552

Table 3

FRESNO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

MEASUR E C FUND APPORTIONMENT CALCULATIONS
Local Allocation S u b Program
FY2026/27 6/10/2026 Approved by the FCT A Board
2026 2024
Population Road
Miles
75% 25% Percent Percent
Clovis 129,889 4(;2.5 0.093519242 O.Q16129 175
Coalinga 17 ,692 59.9 0.01 2738126 0.002,.01322
Firebaugh 8,369 25.1 0.005385623 0 .001007097
Fowler 7.9 45 33.S 0.005720349 0.001343731
Fresno 560,948 1,650.9 0.4 03878941 0.066562551
Huron 6.888 13.5 0.004959316 0 .000540618
Kerman 17.498 472 0.01259844 7 0.001889558
Kingsburg 13 ,347 51 .2 0.0096097 54 0.002050662
Mendota 12.805 25 0 0.009219517 0.001002688
Orange Cove 9,578 26 .6 0.006968098 0.001 066008
Perre ~ 4/"'Si ~- Q Q Ql Q66,665 Q QQ)~Sl2'•
Reedley 26,845 77 .2 0.019328227 0 .003095429
San Joaquin .'.l,536 12.3 0.002517897 0.000490925
Sanger 27,403 88 ,6 0.019729983 0.003548683
Selma 24 ,484 91.8 0.017628322 0.003579329
County of Fresno 159,091 3,591 .0 0.114544494 0 .143911013 TOTAL 1,041 ,676 6,238.2 0.750000 0.250000
Urban Rural
Population Popuia1ion
Clovis 129,8 89
Coalinga 17.692
Firebaugh 8.869
Fowler 7 ,945
Fresno 560,948
Huron 6,888
Kerman 17,498
Kingsburg 13 ,347
Mendota 12,805
Orange Cove 9,678
Parlier 14 ,658
Reedley 26,845
San Joaquin 3,636
Sanger 27,403
Selma 24,484
County of Fresno 4 0,886 118,205
TOTAL 731,723 309,953
1,041 ,676

10.96%

1.51%

0.74%
0 .71%

47.04%

0.55%

1.45%

1.17%

1.02%

0.80%
~ ~ so, 2.24%

0.31¾

2.33%

2.13%

25.85%
100.00%
Formula Above
Minimum
$100,000
Min
100,000 3,616,815
100,000 499,383
100,000 243,853
100,000 233,013
100,000 15,517,779
100,000 181,418
100,000 477,895
100,000 384 ,625
100,000 337,185
100,000 265 ,009
lCC COO 3go :Jeo
100,000 739,657
100,000 102,548
100,000 767,860
100,000 702,845
100,000 8,525,301
1,600,000 32,985,564
32,985,564
Pedestrian/Trials
Urban Rural
431,357
1,862,692
135,782
2,430,031
2,430,031
61,288
30,724
27,523
0 23,861
60,616
46,237
44 ,359
33,526
50,778
92 ,996
12,596
94,930

84.617
409.484
1,073,735
1,073,735
3,503,766

1.75% of Local Allee
Local 48 .25% of Local
P.. llocation Street Maint. Tota l Redistribute Redistribute Allee Prog ram 50% of Allocable to Ped/Trails Bic.Fac. ADA Flexible Ped/Trails Ped/Trails Bicycle Local
Allocation Program Compliance Funding Urban Rural Facilities Total 3,716,815 1,858,408 4,259,709 0 0 65,044 1,793,364 431,357 0 111,537 4,259,709 599,383 299,692 676,071 61.288 15,400 10,489 365,891 0 0 0 676,071 343,853 171 ,927 362,097 30,724 7,520 6,017 204 ,1 54 0 0 0 382,097 333 ,013 166,507 367,722 27,523 7,186 5,828 195,388 0 0 0 367,722 15,617,779 7.808,890 17 ,959,213 0 0 273,311 7,535 ,579 1,862,892 0 478,542 17,959,213 281,418 140,709 310,874 23,861 5,595 4,925 165,240 0 0 0 310,874 577 ,895 288,948 653,249 60,616 14,738 10,1 13 354 ,189 0 0 0 653,249 484,625 242,313 542,723 46,237 11 ,861 8,481 · 291 ,930 0 0 0 542,723 437,185 218,593 491,942 44.359 10,398 7,65 1 265,699 0 0 a 491,942 365,009 182 ,505 406,707 33,526 8,172 6 ,388 217,815 0 0 o 406,707 ds.10 380 2d5 lo•_ 551 J 9:Z sa zz:a J2 03° B 5~2 2S2 ~,~ Q 0 0 553 197 839,657 419,829 955,463 0 0 14,694 405, 135 0 92,996 22,810 955,463 202.546 IO 1,213 2 18,304 12,596 3,162 3 ,545 I iJ,4QQ 0 0 e 2 16,984 867,660 433,930 986,470 0 0 15,1 88 418,742 0 94,930 23,680 986,470 802,845 401,423 909,337 84,8 17 21,675 14,050 493,865 0 0 0 909,337 8,625,301 4,312,651 9, 433.474 0 0 150,943 4,161,708 135,782 409,484 262,90 7 9,433,474 34,565,564 17,292,782 39,106,552 476,325 117,746 605,249 17,281,604 2,430,031 597,41 a 899, 476 39, 106,552 FY25 L TP Allocation
3,503,766
Redistribute to Bicycle Fae. Redistribute to
Flexible Fundni Sub Program Flexible Fundng
0 11 1,537
61, 288 15,400 15, 400
30,724 7 ,520 7,520
27,523 7,186 7,186
0 478,542 0
23,861 5,595 5,595
60,616 14,738 14,738
46,237 11 ,861 11,861
44,359 10,398 10,398
33,526 8,1 72 B, 172
50,778 12,039 12,039
0 22,810 0
12,596 3,162 3, 162
0 23,680 0
84,817 21,675 21,675
0 262,907 0
597 ,410 899,476
476,325 1,017,222 117,746 1,017,222
1,017,222

DATE:

TITLE:

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
~ Consent Calendar
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: _ (o __ July 28, 2026
ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-048 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026- 2027 ADOPTED BUDGET APPROPRIATING AN ADDITIONAL $58,700 IN ARTICLE 8 LOCAL TRANSPORTATION FUNDS FOR THE PROCUREMENT OF

A BUCKET TRUCK WITH A MATERIAL HANDLER ATTACHMENT AND
STABILIZING OUTRIGGERS.

SUBMITTED: Russ Robertson, Public Works Directo~
APPROVED: Nicole Zieba, City Manager ~

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-048 appropriating an additional $58,700 from Article 8 fund balance for the acquisition of a bucket truck equipped with a Material Handler attachment and stabilizing outriggers.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
During preparation of the FY 2026-2027 budget in February, staff conducted a market review of bucket trucks that would meet the operational needs of the City's Public Works Department.

Based on pricing available at that time, $170,000 was appropriated for the purchase of a new bucket truck.

Since adoption of the budget, manufacturers have increased pricing due to market conditions and equipment demand. Additionally, to safely lift and set light poles, utility poles, and similar vertical infrastructure, staff is recommending the inclusion of a Material Handler attachment and outriggers, to stabilize the vehicle during lifting operations. This capability is not available on the City's existing bucket trucks, which are primarily used by the City's Electricians and were not designed for pole-setting or pole-lifting tasks.

Given the increased project workload and the safety improvements associated with the Material Handler, staff believes the enhanced configuration is necessary to support current and future operations.

The updated cost of a bucket truck meeting the City's specifications is priced at $199,396.

When taxes and destination charges are added the total cost of the truck is $228,700, which exceeds the original appropriation by $58,700. The cost of the truck is based on Sourcewell

Contract Pricing which means that the purchase price has been competitively solicited and set by a publicly awarded cooperative purchasing agreement. The current Article 8 fund balance is approximately 1.2 million dollars.

The requested bucket truck configuration will improve operational efficiency, enhance staff safety, and support multiple upcoming capital and maintenance projects.

FISCAL IMPACT
The Article 8 fund balance would be reduced by $58,700.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution 2026-048

BUDGET AMENDMENT
RESOLUTION 2026-048
The City Council of the City of Reedley does hereby amend the 2026-27 Budget as follows:

SECTION I - ADDITIONS
Account Number Account Description Amount
011-4440.5996 Article 8 • Bucket Truck $ 58,700
Total $ 58,700
Purpose: Amends the FY 2026-27 Adopted Budget appropriating sufficient funds for the procurement of a bucket truck with a material handler attachment and stabilizing outriggers.

SECTION II - SOURCE OF FUNDING
Account Number Account Description Amount
011 -2710 L TF Article 8 Streets & Roads - $ 58,700
Unallocated Fund Balance
Total $ 58,700
Impact: Reduction of Article 8 unallocated fund balance.

REVIEWED: RECOMMENDED:
&~
Assistant City Manager
tuAL\
City Manager
The foregoi ng resolution was approved by the City Council of the City of Reedley on July 28, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN : APPROVED:

Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
Outriggers for stability when lifting
Material handler for raising poles, etc.

DATE:

TITLE:

SUBMITTED:

APPROVED:

July 28, 2026

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
~ Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: _7 __

CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING ITEMS (A) AND (B) FOR THE REEDLEY WATER

EXTENSION/CONNECTIONS PROJECT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A WATER

MAIN ON PARLIER AVENUE AND COLUMBIA AVENUE
(A) ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-050 AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND DOCUMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE

PROJECT
(B) ADOPT BUDGET AMENDMENT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-051 AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2026-2027 BUDGET TO APPROPRIATE AVAILABLE FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $86,000 FOR THE PROJECT
Marilu S. Morales, P.E. \ \ ri \
City Engineer ~
Nicole R. Zieba , • - /
City Manager VW

RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:
(A) Adopt Resolution No. 2026-050, authorizing the City Manager, or designee, to execute all agreements and documents associated with the Reedley Water Extensions/Connections Project (Project) for the installation of a water main on Parlier Avenue and Columbia Avenue for private residents (City and County).
(B) Adopt Budget Amendment Resolution No. 2026-051 amending the fiscal year 2026-2027 budget to appropriate available funds in the amount of $86,000 for the Project.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City was contacted by multiple residents along Columbia Avenue and Parlier Avenue who receive water from wells and the wells have gone dry. Those residents were directed by staff to contact Self Help Enterprises (SHE) to receive temporary water tanks and water bottles. Due to so many residents being affected, SHE contacted the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) to inquire about funding for installing a water main to serve all of the residents. The State asked that the City submit a letter of intent stating the City was onboard with the project and willing to connect the residents to the City's water system prior to proceeding with the project.

On September 13, 2022, Council authorized the submittal of a letter of intent to the SWRCB regarding the installation of a water main on Parlier Avenue and Columbia Avenue to service approximately 34 rural residential lots. After the submission of the letter of intent staff worked closely with SHE and the SWRCB regarding this Project. SHE retained Yamabe & Horn Engineering, Inc. (Y&H) to prepare a preliminary engineering report for Project. In order for the work to continue on the Project the City had to submit a financial assistance application to the SWRCB. On November 14, 2023, Council authorized the submittal of a financial assistance application to the SWRCB and authorized the City Manager to execute any agreements with the SWRCB regarding the Project. Staff worked with SHE and the SWRCB to prepare the financial assistance application and submitted it in December of 2023. Staff continued to submit additional items as requested by the SWRCB. In addition, SHE requested that Y&H prepare a plan set for the project, which was designed to 90%.

In September of 2025 the City received a preliminary funding award notification for the Project from the SWRCB via Expedited Drinking Water Grant (EDWG) funding. Upon receipt of the letter staff worked with SWRCB, SHE and the City's Legal Counsel to review the grant funding agreement, update the construction costs and finalize items necessary for the final agreement. In May 2026, the City received the final grant agreement with a project funding amount of $3,389,000 which will cover all expenses for the Project including finalizing the project plans and specification, support from SHE, construction costs, construction contingency, construction management, permit and connection fees and conditional costs associated with the Project. In order to continue receiving support from SHE the City must enter into an agreement with SHE since the Project has now received funding. In addition, the City must enter into an agreement with Y&H to finalize the plans from 90% to 100%. The funding for these items has been accounted for in the grant amount. Staff is requesting that City Council adopt Resolution No. 2026-050 authorizing the City Manager to execute all agreements and documents associated with the Project.

In conjunction with the request for authorization for the City Manager, staff is requesting that City Council adopt Budget Amendment Resolution No. 2026-051 amending the fiscal year 2026-2027 budget to appropriate available funds in the amount of $86,000 for the Project. These funds will be used to finalize the Project plans, receive support from SHE and reimburse staff time associated with the Project.

Construction for the Project is anticipated to begin in July of 2027 and the construction costs will be allocated in the fiscal year 2027-2028 budget.

FISCAL IMPACT
The budget to finalize the Project prior to construction is $86,000, which is fully reimbursable through the Project grant. The construction costs for the project are $3,303,000 and will be included in the fiscal year 2027-2028 budget.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution No. 2026-050

2. Budget Amendment Resolution No. 2026-051

3. Map of project location and potential parcels to be connected to City water services.

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-050

A RESOLUTION TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE ALL AGREEMENTS AND DOCUMENTS FOR

THE REEDLEY WATER EXTENSION/CONNECTIONS PROJECT ALONG PARLIER

AVENUE AND COLUMBIA AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Reedley ("the Entity") is eligible to receive State Funding for certain water related projects through the State Water Resources Control Board; and WHEREAS, the City of Reedley wishes to delegate authorization to execute all documents, agreements and any amendments to the City Manager, or designee, for the planning, design and construction of the Reedley Water Extensions/Connections Project for the installation of water main and services along Parlier Avenue and Columbia Avenue; and WHEREAS, Authorized Representative, or designee, is designated to represent the Entity in carrying out the Entity's responsibilities under the grant agreement and in compliance with applicable state laws.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Reedley using their independent judgment hereby resolves as follows:

1. The above recitals are true and correct; and

2. The City Council authorizes the City Manager, or designee, to execute all documents, agreements and any amendments thereto associated with the Reedley Water Extensions/Connections Project.

3. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption.

This foregoing resolution is hereby approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Reedley this 28th day of July 2026 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN:

ABSENT:

Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk

BUDGET AMENDMENT
RESOLUTION 2026-051
The City Council of the City of Reedley does hereby amend the 2026-2027 Budget as follows:

SECTION I - ADDITIONS
Account Number Account Description Amount
049-4501.6039 Reedley Water Extension/Connections $ 86,000 Total $ 86,000
Purpose: Preconstruction costs associated with the Reedley Water Extensions/Connections Project for the installation of water main and services on Parlier Avneue and Columbia Avenue

SECTION II - SOURCE OF FUNDING
Account Number Account Description Amount
049-3890 SWRCB Reedley Water Extension/Connections $ 86,000 Total $ 86,000
Impact: Sufficient funds in SWRCB grant funding for the preconstruction costs associated with the Reedley Water Extensions/Connections Project
REVIEWED:

City Manager
The foregoing resolution was approved by the City Council of the City of Reedley on July 28, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN: APPROVED:

Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
&

PARLIER AVE
363, 110-04
363-110:03
363-110;29
!
~
' 363!110-28
36~110-07,
363;110-31
D Connected to Reedley Water
System (10)
0 400
Feet
Not Connected to Reedley
Water System (32)
800
Vacant Lot (4) Lots Not In
-
cluded on Tracking
Sheet (2)
363;o9~0-23 ~
0 I
Map 2 - Parlier-Columbia Service Area
rm7 Yamabe &. Horn LI.'!~ Engineering, Inc.

U\1/L t:NC:!_Nffl<S~D SUR_Y.El'ORS
DATE: July 28, 2026

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
~ Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: ______ B
___ _
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-053 AMENDING THE 2026-27 ADOPTED BUDGET IN THE GENERAL FUND AUTHORIZING THE ALLOCATION OF $20,000

TO BE USED FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT UPGRADES
SUBMITTED: Michael Canales, Fire Chief
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager ~

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt Resolution No. 2026-053 amending the FY 2026-27 Adopted Budget in the General Fund to authorize the allocation of $20,000 for the Fire Station Remodel Project.

BACKGROUND
In October 2025, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2025-026 accepting a generous $45,000 donation from the Elizabeth Vines Estate to support the Reedley Fire Department. A portion of the donation was used to purchase the Department's water rescue boat, leaving a remaining balance of $20,000.

Staff recommends using the remaining donation funds to renovate the fire station bunkroom and common living areas. The proposed improvements include the purchase of new furniture, interior painting, replacement of kitchen flooring, installation of new appliances, replacement of countertops and sink, and other minor upgrades necessary to modernize the space.

The Reedley Fire Station was constructed in 1978 and has not undergone any significant renovation since its original construction. These improvements will provide a safer, more functional, and more comfortable living environment for firefighters who spend extended periods at the station. The remodel is also expected to improve employee morale while extending the useful life of the facility.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund. The entire project will be funded through the remaining $20,000 balance of the Elizabeth Vines Estate donation that was previously accepted by the City Council. No additional City funds are being requested.

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution 2026-053

BUDGET AMENDMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-053
The City Council of the City of Reedley does hereby amend the 2026-27 Budget as follows:

SECTION I - ADDITIONS
Account Number Account Description Amount
001-4300.6813 Fire Station Remodel $ 20,000
Total $ 20,000
Donation funds from the estate of Elizabeth Vines will be used to renovate the bunkroom and common living areas at the fire station.

SECTION II - SOURCE OF FUNDING
Account Number Account Description Amount
001-3770 General Fund Donations $ 20,000
Total $ 20,000
Impact: No impact to the General Fund. Source of funds is a donation from the estate of Elizabeth Vines, a former City employee, in support of the Reedley Fire Department.

REVIEWED:
'11-R~
Assistant City Manager City Manager
The foregoing resolution was approved by the City Council of the City of Reedley on July 28, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN : APPROVED:

Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
DATE:

TITLE:

July 28, 2026

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent
D Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
~ Public Hearing
ITEM NO: ____ q'---_

CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER ITEMS ASSOCIATED
WITH A PROPOSED PROJECT LOCATED AT 1533 EAST MYRTLE AVENUE (APN 370-345-06):

A) INTRODUCTION AND FIRST READING OF ORDINANCE NO. 2026-002,

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2026-05, A
"COMMON SENSE" EXEMPTION; AND APPROVING REZONE
APPLICATION NO. 2026-01 AND AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT OF

THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY
B) ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 2026-052, APPROVING
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2026-06, A CATEGORICAL
EXEMPTION DATED JULY 16, 2026, AND APPROVING TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP APPLICATION NO. 2026-01
SUBMITTED: Ellen Moore, City Planner ~ Community Development Department REVIEWED: Rodney L. Horton, Director
Community Development Department
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba "" ✓ City Manager l Q

RECOMMENDATION
Staff and the Reedley Planning Commission recommends that the City Council of the City of Reedley conduct a public hearing and take the following actions:

A) Introduce Ordinance No. 2026-002, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City Of Reedley adopting Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05, a "common sense" exemption; and approving Rezone Application No. 2026-01 and authorizing the Amendment of the Official Zoning Map of the City of Reedley B) Adopt Resolution No. 2026-052, Adopting Environmental Assessment No. 2026- 06, a Categorical Exemption dated July 16, 2026 and approving Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The following entitlement applications have been submitted for a 1.11 -acre parcel (APN 370-345-06) located at 1533 East Myrtle Avenue, at the southwest corner of East Myrtle Avenue and North Cedar Avenue:

Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002) pertains to the rezoning and reclassification of one 1.11-acre parcel (APN 370-345-06), located at 1533 East Myrtle Avenue, from the MOR (Medium Density Residential) Zone District with a PUD Overlay to the R-1-6 (Low Density Residential) Zone District. The proposed rezone would achieve consistency with the parcel's existing Low Density Residential General Plan Land Use Designation. Staff has determined that a "common sense" exemption is appropriate for the rezone, through Environmental Assessment 2026-05.

Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 pertains to the subdivision of land from one 1.11-acre residentially zoned parcel (APN 370-345-06) located at 1533 East Myrtle Avenue into four parcels for low density residential development purposes. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan goals and policies and the Reedley Municipal Code. The Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66400 et. seq.) findings can be made to approve Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01. Staff has determined that a Categorical Exemption is appropriate for Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 , through Environmental Assessment 2026-06.

Staff presented Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05, Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002), Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06, and Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 to the Planning Commission for their consideration , to receive public comment, and to make a recommendation to the City Council. The Reedley Planning Commission recommended approval of the entitlement applications and accompanying environmental assessments. See Attachments 6 and 7.

Rezone Application No. 2026-01 is being introduced to the City Council for first reading as Ordinance No. 2026-002. Any action taken by the City Council on Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 shall be final.

BORDERING PROPERTY INFORMATION
1011 Planned Land Use Existing Zoning Existing Land Use North Low Density Residential R-1 -7 (Low Density Residential) Single unit residential East Low Density Residential R-1 -6 (Low Density Residential) Single unit residential South Low Density Residential MOR (Medium Density Single unit residential Residential) w/ PUD Overlay West Low Density Residential MOR (Medium Density Single unit residential Residential) w/ PUD Overlay

PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The following entitlement applications have been submitted for a 1.11-acre parcel (APN 370-345-06) located at 1533 East Myrtle Avenue, at the southwest corner of East Myrtle Avenue and North Cedar Avenue:

Rezone Application No. 2026-01 pertains to the rezoning and reclassification of APN 370-345-06 from the MOR (Medium Density Residential) Zone District with a PUD Overlay to the R-1-6 (Low Density Residential) Zone District to achieve consistency with the parcel's existing Low Density Residential General Plan Land Use Designation.

The proposed rezoning is included as Attachment 1 a (Exhibit A) showing the existing zoning and proposed zoning of the subject parcel, as well as surrounding parcels.

Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 pertains to the subdivision of land from one residentially zoned parcel (APN 370-345-06) into four parcels for low density residential development purposes, including the installation of public improvements. Proposed Parcel 'A' would be approximately 12,291 net square feet in size and contains the existing residence and accessory structures , with two structures proposed to be removed. Proposed Parcel 'B' would be approximately 10,729 net square feet in size and contains existing residential structures that would be removed. Proposed Parcel 'C' would be approximately 11,039 net square feet in size and is currently vacant. Proposed Parcel 'D' would be approximately 9,635 net square feet in size and is currently vacant. No new development is being proposed at the time of this application submittal.

The proposed parcel map is included as Attachment 3b (TPM 2026-01 Exhibit A), showing the lot configurations. Conditions specific to the development may be found within Attachment 3a (Draft Conditions of Approval dated July 16, 2026 attached to City Council Resolution No. 2026-052), which details general, department-specific and miscellaneous requirements the development must meet and/or perform, if approved.

PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
The subject parcel is classified with a Low Density Residential General Plan Planned Land Use Designation, which is intended for single unit detached residential development, attached single unit residential development, and low density multi-unit residential uses. The Low Density Residential designation is the predominant residential designation in the City of Reedley. This land use category accommodates the typical residential subdivision in Reedley.

The subject parcel is classified with a MOR (Medium Density Residential) Zone District with a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Overlay. This is inconsistent with the existing General Plan Land Use Designation, which is Low Density Residential.

Rezone Application No. 2026-01 proposes to rezone the subject parcel to the R-1-6 (Low Density Residential) Zone District in order to achieve consistency with the existing General Plan Land Use Designation for the property. The Low Density Residential Zone Districts are designed to allow a mixture of housing types and densities in newly developing and predominantly low-density residential areas of the City. These Zone Districts allow one-unit dwellings and encourage missing middle housing types (i.e. two-unit and three-unit dwellings), as well as complimentary human services land uses on a variety of parcel sizes. In accordance with Reedley Municipal Code Section 10.10.030 (Development Standards), the R-1-6 Zone District requires a minimum parcel size of 5,000 square feet for each proposed parcel being created. All proposed parcels are consistent with the minimum 5,000 square feet requirement.

As discussed above, the intent of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2026-01 is to subdivide the property into four parcels for low density residential development. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan Designation and implements General Plan Land Use Policy LU 2.7.5 to encourage and support within existing neighborhoods in-fill development. Additionally, the subdivision of land would allow the opportunity for more units to be built on the project site, which would help the City of Reedley achieve its Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) identified in the City of Reedley's 6th Cycle Housing Element. The proposed project is consistent with the proposed Zone District of the subject property, and development of the land is consistent with the Reedley Municipal Code.

Approval of Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06 and Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026- 01 is contingent upon approval of Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05 and Rezone Application No. 2026-01 through adoption of Ordinance No. 2026-002 because Rezone Application No. 2026-01 achieves consistency with the General Plan, which is a finding that needs to be made in order to approve subsequent entitlement applications.

TENTATIVE MAP FINDINGS (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICATION NO. 2026-01) Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and Reedley Municipal Code (RMC) Section 11.08.080, a tentative map shall be approved if the following findings can be made:

1. That the proposed tentative map is consistent with the general plan or any applicable specific plan as specified in Government Code section 65451.

As noted in the General Plan Consistency discussion above, the proposed parcel map is consistent with the 2030 General Plan. Further, pursuant to Title 11 (Subdivision Ordinance) of the RMC, the parcel map design meets the zoning ordinance criteria for development in the existing zone district classifications.

2. That the design or improvement of the proposed subdivision of land is consistent with the general plan or any applicable specific plan.

The proposed parcel map, with its design and improvements, is consistent with the Reedley General Plan Update 2030 because its design helps achieve many of the General Plan's adopted goals and policies, including encouraging in-fill development.

3. That the site of the proposed subdivision of land is physically suitable for the type of development.

This site is physically suitable for the proposed type and density of development, because the conditions of approval prepared would ensure adequate access within and around the site, and that development shall occur in accordance with adopted standards, goals, objectives, and policies for development in the City of Reedley.

4. That the site of the proposed subdivision of land is physically suitable for the proposed density of development.

The site is physically suitable for the ultimate proposed average density of development set forth in the Reedley General Plan.

5. That the design of the proposed subdivision of land or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause significant and unavoidable impacts to fish , wildlife or their habitat.

The proposed parcel map design and improvements are not likely to cause substantial and considerable damage to the natural environment, including fish , wildlife or their habitat, because the site is located adjacent to an area that has developed with urban uses.

6. That the design of the proposed subdivision of land or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems.

The proposed parcel map design and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health and safety problems because the conditions of approval have shown and would ensure that the subdivision of land conforms to City health and safety standards, specifications, and policies.

7. That the design of the proposed subdivision of land or the type of improvements will not conflict

with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision.

The proposed parcel map design will not conflict with public easements within or through the site, because the project design and conditions of approval will assure noninterference with any existing or proposed easements on the subject property.

8. That the tentative parcel map meets or performs any of the requirements or conditions imposed by the Subdivision Map Act or the Reedley Municipal Code.

The tentative parcel map is subject to conditions of approval imposed by the parcel map and the Reedley Municipal Code, therefore the development of the tentative parcel map is required to comply with all conditions, standards, and policies.

9. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.1, the design of a subdivision of land for which a tentative map is required pursuant to Section 66426 shall provide, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision .

The design of the associated subdivision provides, to the extent feasible, for future passive and natural heating or cooling opportunities due to the required compliance with the California Energy Code and property development standards as required by the RMC.

The tentative parcel map, subject to the recommended conditions of approval, complies with the design and property development standards of the Zoning Ordinance, the Subdivision Map Act, and local Subdivision Ordinance. Based upon the plans and information submitted by the applicant and the recommended conditions of project approval, staff has determined that these findings can be made.

Therefore, the appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its consistency with guiding land use principles, goals and policies of the Reedley General Plan and regulatory standards set forth in the RMC and its compatibility with surrounding existing or proposed uses. These factors have been evaluated as described above. Upon consideration of this evaluation, it can be concluded that Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 is appropriate for the subject property.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05 determined that Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002) is Categorically Exempt under Section 15061 (b)(3) (the "common sense" exemption) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. See Attachment 2.

Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06 determined that Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026- 01 is Categorically Exempt under Section 15332 (Class 32/ln-fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. See Attachment 4.

Approval of Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06 is contingent upon approval of Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05 and Rezone Application No. 2026-01 through adoption of Ordinance No. 2026-002.

PUBLIC NOTICING
Pursuant to the Government Code Section 65091 (Planning and Zoning Law) and Reedley Municipal Code, Section 11.08.070, it is required that a notice be published in a newspaper of general circulation and be sent to surrounding property owners. Such notices were appropriately disseminated to surrounding property owners on June 25, 2026; additionally, a notice was published in the June 18, 2026 publication of the Mid-Valley Times. See Attachment 5 for the proof of Public Noticing .

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The project applicant has paid all applicable entitlement application fees.

ATTACHMENTS & EXHIBITS

1. Ordinance No. 2026-002, an Ordinance of the City Council of the City of Reedley Approving Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05 and Approving Rezone Application No. 2026-01 and Authorizing the Amendment of the Official Zoning Map of the City of Reedley a. Exhibit A: Map of affected parcel(s) related to Rezone Application No. 2026-01

2. Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05 prepared for Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002)

3. Resolution No. 2026-052, a Resolution of the City Council of the City of Reedley Approving Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 and Related Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06
a. Draft Conditions of Approval for Tentative Parcel Map (TPM) Application No. 2026-01 , dated July 16, 2026
b. Exhibit A: TPM 2026-01 dated April 14, 2026

4. Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06 prepared for Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
· 5. Public Noticing: Proof of Publication and Mailing

6. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2026-09

7. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2026-10

ORDINANCE NO. 2026-002

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY APPROVING ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2026-05 AND REZONE APPLICATION NO. 2026-01 AND AUTHORIZING THE AMENDMENT OF THE

OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY
WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002) pertains to the rezoning and reclassification of one 1.11-acre parcel (APN 370-345-06), located at 1533 East Myrtle Avenue, from the MOR (Medium Density Residential) Zone District with a PUD Overlay to the R-1-6 (Low Density Residential) Zone District to achieve consistency with the parcel's existing Low Density Residential General Plan Land Use Designation; and
WHEREAS, the appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its consistency with the goals and policies of the Reedley General Plan and regulatory standards set forth in the Reedley Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the rezoning for the parcel identified in Rezone Application No. 2026-01 is consistent with the GPU Planned Land Use and Zoning District Consistency Matrix; and WHEREAS, specific Land Use Element goals and policies, which when applied, would further support the zone district reclassification; and
WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. 2026-01 is consistent with the Reedley Municipal Code, Title 10, Zoning Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the project was evaluated and processed in accordance with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05 determined that this project is categorically exempt under the "common sense" exemption under Section 15061 (b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the City of Reedley Planning Commission, at the regular meeting on July 16, 2026, after receiving a written staff report, holding a public hearing, inviting public comment, and independently deliberating, recommended that the City Council approve Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05 and Rezone Application No. 2026-01; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 65090 and 65091 (Planning and Zoning Law) of the Government Code and the procedures of Title 10 of the Reedley Municipal Code, a Notice of Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation on July 2, 2026, and was mailed to surrounding property owners on July 2, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Reedley, at a regular meeting on July 28, 2026, held a public hearing, received a written staff report, invited public comment, and independently deliberated .

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Reedley does hereby ordain as follows:

Section 1.
and
Section 2.

Ordinance 2026-002

The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference; The City Council of the City of Reedley APPROVES Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05, a "common sense" exemption under Section 15061 (b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and
Section 3. The City Council Fl NOS that Rezone Application No. 2026-01 is consistent with the Reedley General Plan Update 2030; and
Section 4. The City Council FINDS that Rezone Application No. 2026-01 is consistent with the Reedley Municipal Code, Title 10, Zoning Regulations, Chapter 10.06 (Zoning Districts and Map) and Chapter 10.110 (Amendments); and
Section 5. The City Council hereby APPROVES Rezone Application No. 2026-01 and incorporates into the zoning law and map of the City of Reedley, as reflected on Map A; and Section 6. The City Council hereby APPROVES the amendment to the City's Official Zoning Map to include the above changes and ADOPTS said updated map as the City's Official Zoning Map; and
Section 7. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a summary of this ordinance to be published by one insertion in a newspaper of general circulation in the community at least five (5) days prior to adoption and again within fifteen (15) days after its adoption; and Section 8. This Ordinance does not have to be codified in the Reedley Municipal Code because it is solely authorizing the update of the City's Official Zoning Map; and Section 9. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage and adoption, as certified by the City Clerk.

ATTEST:

I hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2026-002 was introduced and given first reading by title only at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Reedley held on July 28, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
Attachment:

Map A: Map of affected parcel(s) related to Rezone Application No. 2026-01 Ordinance 2026-002

Project Information
APN(s): 370-356-06
City of Reedley
Ordinance No. 2026-002
Rezone Application No. 2026-01
Exhibit A
ADDRESS: 1533 East Myrtle Ave, Reedley, CA
Existing Zoning Designation:

MDR
E- '"\___.J. _ _j
,-.,.--,--,--,--,---,---,--.,..---,---.,--,---... £fEffl .

Location Map
Proposed Zoning Designation:

R-1-6
0 200 400 800 Feet
Legend
':. "': Subject Property City of Reedley Zone Districts 'f:.','J Reedley City Limits c::J Residential Estate (RE) c::J Low Density Residential SP (R-l(SP))
c::J Low Density Residential (R-1-6)
c::J Low Density Residential (R-1-7)
c::J Low Density Residential (R-1-9)
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
High Density Residential (HDR)
c::J Neighborhood Commercial (CN)
- Central and Community Commercial (CC)
- Service Commercial (CS)
Professional Office (PO)
c::J Light Industrial (ML)
Heavy Industrial (MH)
- Resource Conservation and Open Space (RCO)
C:J Urban Reserve (UR)
E22J P (Planned Unit Development) Overlay

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
To: County Clerk
County of Fresno
2220 Tulare Street, 1st Floor
Fresno, CA 93721

THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN IS DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 19 OF THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES.

LEAD AGENCY:

APPLICANT:

PROJECT TITLE:

PROJECT LOCATION:

City of Reedley
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Phone: (559) 637-4200 x 222
E-mail: [email protected]
JJI Investments LLC
2319 Webster St.

Sanger CA 93657
559-903-8463
Jji. [email protected]
Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05 for Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002)
1533 East Myrtle Avenue, Reedley CA 93654 (APN 370-345-06) EXEMPT STATUS: Categorical Exemption
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002) pertains to the reclassification of one 1.11-acre parcel (APN 370-345-06) from MOR (Medium Density Residential) with a PUD Overlay to R-1-6 (Low Density Residential) to achieve consistency with the parcel's existing Low Density Residential General Plan Land Use Designation.

This project is exempt under the Common Sense Exemption, Section 15061(b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

EXPLANATION: There is no possibility that the adoption of Rezone Application No. 2026-01, in and of itself, may result in a significant effect on the environment. The Rezone corrects an inconsistency between the existing General Plan Land Use Designation and zone district of the subject property and does not approve or authorize physical development or construction activities. Future development proposals would remain subject to separate discretionary review and environmental review pursuant to CEQA, as applicable.

The project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3) (Common Sense Exemption) because it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility the proposed Rezone may have a significant effect on the environment.

Date: July 16, 2026 Submitted by:

Ellen Moore, AICP, City Planner
City of Reedley
Community Development Department
(559) 637-4200 ext. 222
ellen. [email protected]
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-052

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICATION NO. 2026-01 AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2026-06
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 pertains to the division of land of one legal lot of record into four legal lots of record for future low density residential development; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located at 1533 East Myrtle Avenue (APN 370-345- 06); and
WHEREAS, the property is approximately 1.11 acres in size and has a zoning designation of R-1-6 (Low Density ResidentiaD; and
WHEREAS, the appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its consistency with the goals and policies of the Reedley General Plan and regulatory standards set forth in the Reedley Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01, subject to the recommended conditions of approval, complies with the design and property development standards of the Reedley General Plan, Reedley Municipal Code, and the Subdivision Map Act; and
WHEREAS, the project was evaluated and processed in accordance with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06 determined that this project is categorically exempt under Section 15332 (Class 32/ln-fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and WHEREAS, at a duly noticed public hearing on July 16, 2026, the City of Reedley Planning Commission, using their independent judgment, recommended to the City Council approval of Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 and Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06; and
CC Resolution No. 2026-052
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 Page I of 3 WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 65090 and 65091 (Planning and Zoning Law) of the Government Code and the procedures of Title 10 of the Reedley Municipal Code, a Notice of Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation on July 2, 2026, and was mailed to surrounding property owners on July 2, 2026; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Reedley, at the regular meeting on July 28, 2026, held a public hearing to review the tentative parcel map application and environmental assessment; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Reedley received public testimony, oral and written staff report, and deliberated; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Reedley determined that the proposed project is consistent with the Reedley General Plan, Reedley Municipal Code, and the Subdivision Map Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Reedley approve Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 and Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06 based on the following:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference; and

2. The City Council of the City of Reedley finds that Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 is consistent with the goals and polices of the Reedley General Plan; and

4. The City Council of the City of Reedley finds that the design or improvements of the proposed parcel map are consistent with the Reedley General Plan; and

5. The City Council of the City of Reedley finds that the site of the proposed subdivision of land is physically suitable for the type of development; and

6. The City Council of the City of Reedley finds that the site of the proposed subdivision of land is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; and

7. The City Council of the City of Reedley finds that the design of the proposed subdivision of land or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause significant and unavoidable impacts to fish, wildlife or their habitat; and

8. The City Council of the City of Reedley finds that the proposed parcel map design is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and

9. The City Council of the City of Reedley finds that the design of the proposed subdivision CC Resolution No. 2026-052
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 Page 2 of 3 or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and

10. The City Council of the City of Reedley finds that the tentative map meets or performs any of the requirements or conditions imposed by the subdivision map act or this title ; and

11. The City Council of the City of Reedley finds that pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.1, the design of the proposed subdivision will provide, to the extent feasible, for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision; and

12. The City Council of the City of Reedley approves the attached conditions of approval for Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01, dated July 16, 2026; and

13. The City Council of the City of Reedley approves Environmental Assessment No. 2026- 06, dated July 16, 2026, a Categorical Exemption under Section 15332 (Class 32/ln-fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

14. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption.

This foregoing resolution is hereby approved and adopted this 28th day of July, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN :

ABSENT:

ATTEST: Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
Ruthie Greenwood , City Clerk
Attachment: Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 Conditions of Approval CC Resolution No. 2026-052
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 Page 3 of 3 Attachment to Resolution No. 2026-052

CITY OF REEDLEY

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICATION NO. 2026-01
AND RELATED REZONE APPLICATION NO. 2026-01

DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
JULY 16, 2026

NOTICE TO PROJECT APPLICANT
In accordance with the provisions of Government Code Section 66020(d)(1 ), the imposition of fees, dedication, reservations or exactions for this project are subject to protest by the project applicant at the time of approval or conditional approval of the development or within 90 days after the date of imposition of fees, dedications, reservation, or exactions imposed on the development project.

This notice does not apply to those fees, dedications, reservations, or exactions which were previously imposed and duly noticed; or, where no notice was previously required under the provisions of Government Code Section 66020(d)(1) in effect before January 1, 1997.

PROJECT INFORMATION
Assessor's Parcel No.:

Project Address:

Project Location:

Existing Planned Land Use:

Existing Zoning:

Proposed Zoning:

Project Description:
370-345-06
1533 East Myrtle Avenue, Reedley CA 93654
Located on the southwestern corner of East Myrtle Avenue and North Cedar Avenue
Low Density Residential
MOR (Medium Density Residential)
R-1-6 (Low Density Residential)
Rezone Application No. 2026-01 pertains to the
reclassification of one 1.11-acre parcel (APN 370-345-06) from MOR (Medium Density Residential) with a PUD
Overlay to R-1-6 (Low Density Residential) to achieve
consistency with the parcel's existing Low Density
Residential General Plan Land Use Designation.

Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026

Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 pertains to the subdivision of land from one 1.11-acre residentially zoned parcel (APN 370-345-06) into four parcels for low density residential development purposes.

GENERAL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

1. Please note that this project is subject to a variety of discretionary conditions of approval.

These include conditions based on adopted City plans and policies, those determined through site plan review and environmental assessments essential to mitigate adverse effects on the environment including the health, safety, and welfare of the community, and recommended conditions for development that are essential to health, safety, and welfare, but would, on the whole, enhance the project and its relationship to the neighborhood and environment.

2. All discretionary conditions of approval will ultimately be deemed mandatory unless appealed verbally or in writing to the City of Reedley Community Development Department.

3. Approval of this special permit shall be considered null and void in the event of failure by the applicant and/or the authorized representative, architect, engineer, or designer to disclose and delineate all facts and information relating to the subject property and the proposed development including, but not limited to, the following :
a. All existing and proposed improvements including but not limited to buildings and structures, signs and their uses, trees, walls, driveways, outdoor storage, and open land use areas on the subject property and all of the preceding which are located on adjoining property and may encroach on the subject property; and b. All public and private easements, rights-of-way and any actual or potential prescriptive easements or uses of the subject property; and c. Existing and proposed grade differentials between the subject property and adjoining property zoned or planned for commercial use.

4. Approval of this special permit may become null and void in the event that development is not completed in accordance with all the conditions and requirements imposed on this special permit, the Zoning Ordinance, and all Public Works Standards and Specifications.

The Community Development Department shall not assume responsibility for any deletions or omissions resulting from the special permit review process or for additions or alterations to construction plans not specifically submitted and reviewed and approved pursuant to this special permit or subsequent amendments or revisions.

5. The applicant shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City of Reedley and each of its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from any and all loss, liability, fines , penalties, forfeitures, damages and costs arising from , resulting from , or in connection with a challenge or contest of the entitlement application and/or the project approvals; or Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026

claims or allegations of a violation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) or any another law, rule or regulations in connection with the granting issuance or approval by the City of any or all rights or benefits granted to the applicant under this entitlement.

The City will promptly notify the Applicant of any such claim, action, or proceedings against the City and the Applicant will either undertake the defense of the matter or abandon the matter and pay the City's associated legal costs or will advance funds to pay for defense of the matter by the City Attorney.

By a separate instrument, the parties will mutually address the defense of the matter, including but not limited to selection of attorney, attorney's fees, litigation expenses and administrative record preparation costs and deposits.

6. Development shall take place in accordance with all city, county, state and federal laws and regulations.

7. No uses of land, buildings, or structures shall be permitted other than those specifically approved pursuant to Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01, the Low Density Residential General Plan Land Use Designation, and the requirements and standards of the proposed R-1-6 (Single-Unit Residential) Zone District.

8. The applicant shall comply with the conditions, policies and standards set forth in the City of Reedley Municipal Code (RMC), Title 11, "Subdivision Regulations," and City of Reedley, Standard Specifications, and any amendments thereto.

9. Upon conditional approval of Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01, the applicant may prepare a Final Map, in substantial conformance with the approved tentative parcel map.

10. The applicant shall pay applicable fees for, but not limited to, plan checks for street improvements and other grading and construction, street signs, water and sewer service, and inspections in accordance with the City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule and any amendments, modifications, or additions thereto.

11. At the time of Final Map submittal, the applicant shall submit engineered construction plans to the City of Reedley, Engineering Department for a master grading, public sanitary sewer system, public water system, street lighting system, public streets, and storm drainage, including other technical reports and engineered plans as necessary to construct the required public improvements and work and applicable processing fees.

12. Engineered construction plans shall be approved by the City prior to the approval of the Final Map. If, at the time of Final Map approval, such plans have not been approved, the applicant shall provide performance security in an amount established by the City to guarantee the completion of plans.

13. Public utilities easements, as necessary, shall be shown on the Final Map and dedicated to the City of Reedley. Public utility easements beyond the limits of the Final Map, but required as a condition of development, shall be acquired at the applicant's cost and shall be dedicated by separate instrument at the time of Final Map approval. The relocation of Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026
Page4
existing utilities necessitated by the required public improvements shall be paid for by the applicant. The applicant is responsible to contact the appropriate utility company for information.

14. The applicant shall furnish to the City acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Reedley Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act. The applicant shall complete all the public improvements prior to the approval of the Final Map by the City. If, at the time of Final Map approval, any public improvements have not been completed and accepted in accordance with the standards of the City, the applicant may elect to enter into an agreement with the City to thereafter guarantee the completion of the improvements.

15. Developer shall contact the United States Postal Service for the location and type of mailboxes to be installed on this property.
a) It is recommended that at least 6 months prior to the first occupancy, the Developer shall contact the local United States Postal Service representative to execute a Mode of Delivery Agreement for New Construction. In addition to executing the Agreement, the Developer shall provide a final site plan (with address details) to the local USPS representative. The developer shall, at their own expense, procure, construct and install all mail receptacle facilities for each location as specified and approved by the USPS.

16. Approval of Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 shall be contingent upon approval of Rezone Application No. 2026-01 through the adoption of Ordinance No. 2026- 002. See RZ 2026-01 Exhibit A.

17. The exercise of rights granted by this special permit shall commence on the day of City Council approval.

18. Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 shall expire two years from approval, pursuant to Reedley Municipal Code Section 11.08.110.
a. Time limits for development may be extended pursuant to Reedley Municipal Code Section 11.08.110.

CITY OF REEDLEY DEPARTMENTAL REQUIREMENTS
Community Development Department:

Planning Division

19. Development shall take place in accordance with the Low Density Residential Planned Land Use Designation, as defined in the Reedley 2030 General Plan.

20. Development shall take place in accordance with the proposed R-1-6 (Low Density Residential) Zone District, as defined in Title 10, Chapter 10.10 of the Reedley Municipal Code.

Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026

21. Development shall take place in substantial conformance with Tentative Parcel Map Application (TPM) No. 2026-01 Exhibit A, dated April 14, 2026.

22. Future development or redevelopment of proposed parcels shall be reviewed by the Community Development Department, Planning Division, in accordance with the Reedley Zoning Code, prior to the submittal of building permits.

23. If new dwelling units are proposed within the boundary of this tentative parcel map, City of Reedley Development Impact Fees (DIF) in accordance with the City of Reedley Master Fee Schedule in place at the time of building permit issuance shall be paid prior to building permit issuance.
a. Development Impact Fees are determined based on proposed use and location. For current fiscal year fee estimates, contact Ellen Moore, City Planner, at (559) 637-4200 x 222 or via e-mail at [email protected].

Applicant shall identify the proposed use (e.g. single family residential, multifamily residential, etc.). b. The developer/property owner may elect to defer a portion of the payment of Development Impact Fees for any lot or parcel until the developer/owner makes a request for final inspection for a building(s) or structure(s) within a residential, commercial, industrial, professional, or institutional development by entering into an agreement with the City. For program details, contact Ellen Moore, City Planner, for more information prior to building permit application submittal.

24. Prior to final map recordation, Developer shall petition and request that the City annex Proposed Parcels B, C, & D of TPM 2026-01 into the City's Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 ("CFO") for the maintenance and operation of public services and facilities.

See Attachment 1 for more information, including a Sample Petition and Written Consent document to be signed by the property owner and a City Council Resolution identifying the current Fiscal Year's assessments. Annexation of the property into the City's CFO is a condition precedent to the City's obligation to issue final map recordation for development or improvement of the parcel within the scope of TPM 2026-01 , and the Developer acknowledges and agrees that if this property were not part of the CFO, the City might lack the financial resources to operate facilities and provide adequate public services to the property.
a. Willdan Financial Services (WFS) will serve as the primary contact and liaison between the City of Reedley and the developer and coordinate the CFO annexation process from start to finish. A representative from Willdan can be reached at (951) 972-8106 or via e-mail at [email protected] . b. The special tax per net developable acres assessment for these public services is currently $898.86 per acre pursuant to City of Reedley, Resolution No. 2026-013. Said special tax shall be levied when final map recordation is approved prior to July 1 of the Fiscal Year and may increase each Fiscal Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026

Year thereafter by an inflation factor determined by the City Council of the City of Reedley and adopted by resolution.
c. The single family residential assessment for these public services is currently $1,106.91 per dwelling unit pursuant to City of Reedley, Resolution No. 2026- 013. Said special tax shall be levied when a building permit has been issued prior to July 1 of the Fiscal Year and may increase each Fiscal Year thereafter by an inflation factor determined by the City Council of the City of Reedley and adopted by resolution.
d. The multi-family residential assessment for these public services is currently $824.15 per dwelling unit pursuant to City of Reedley, Resolution No. 2026- 013. Said special tax shall be levied when a building permit has been issued prior to July 1 of the Fiscal Year and may increase each Fiscal Year thereafter by an inflation factor determined by the City Council of the City of Reedley and adopted by resolution.

Building Division

25. All on-site construction shall comply with all applicable codes and standards as adopted by the City of Reedley, including, but not limited to, fire and building codes. All phases of construction shall be inspected and passed by the City Building Official, and the structure shall not be occupied until a "Certificate of Occupancy" has been issued by the Building Official and the Community Development Director and City Engineer have certified that site conditions have been complied with .

26. Construction area shall be securely fenced to prevent pedestrian travel and separate the area of construction from the public way.

27. Construction hours shall occur in accordance with the Construction Work Hours Handout.

See Attachment 2.

Fire Department:

28. The development shall comply with Chapter 33, Fire Safety During Construction and Demolition, California Fire Code Title 24, Part 9, and as required by the local fire authority.

Public Works:

29. Per city Ordinance 4-1-12: TEMPORARY SERVICES: Effective May 6, 2026, the City's solid waste franchisee, Mid Valley Disposal, shall have exclusive rights to provide temporary trash services, including bin and roll-off services within the City limits at rates approved by the City Council.

Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026

Engineering Department:

General Conditions

30. All public improvements shall comply with the Reedley Municipal Code, the Standard Plans and Specifications of the City of Reedley and any addendums thereto . Public improvement plans shall be prepared by the Developer's engineer, for review and approval by the City Engineer.

31. Developer's engineer shall establish his vertical control for this project to City (NAV88) Datum. Vertical control for this project shall be from City of Reedley Bench Mark No. 26F01, TM = 351.52 (NAV88) [TM =350.71, Bates - for reference only], chiseled square top of curb on the northerly return on the northwesterly corner of Buttonwillow Avenue and Myrtle Avenue. For the basis of bearings see Fresno County Record of Survey Book 57, pgs. 41 -47. All control points shall be approved by the City's contract City Surveyor.

32. An improvement plan check fee of $2,205.00, or current fee at time of submittal according to the City Master Fee Schedule, shall be submitted to the City Engineer with the first submittal of improvement plans. Improvement plans will not be reviewed until the plan check fee is submitted to and processed by the City. Four (4) bond sets of the project improvement plans including civil improvements, grading and drainage, public utilities, and dry utilities, two hard copies of project documentation and a digital copy of all submitted items shall be submitted with the first submittal.

33. With the first submittal to the City, the developer shall prepare and submit an estimated cost of the offsite improvements, based on prevailing wages per California requirements, within the street rights-of-way and/or City easements

34. The Developer's contractor shall apply for an Encroachment Permit with the City of Reedley for all work within the right-of-way and easements. No work within the City right of way will begin until the inspection fees are received/processed and the City Engineer approves the encroachment permit. The inspection fee for the construction of public improvements for streets, water, sewer, storm drain and similar public improvement requirements shall be paid with the issuance of an encroachment permit. Inspection charge shall be 4% of the approved engineer's cost estimate, or current fee at time of submittal according to the City Master Fee Schedule.

35. Any and all work performed in the City of Reedley Rights of Way shall be warranted for a period of 12 months from the date of acceptance.

36. The Developer shall abandon (removal of a portion of the casing and proper capping as per City Standard Plan W-11) any existing water wells within the boundary of the development according to standards and regulations as specified in Section 4-4-1 through 4-4-15 of the Reedley Municipal Code and Section 14.081160 of the Fresno County Code. The Public Works Department must verify either the nonexistence of such wells or the appropriate abandonment of an existing well prior to the issuance of building permits.

Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026

If required to abandon an onsite well , a demolition permit shall be obtained from the Building Official prior to the removal of any existing structures. All septic tanks, dry wells or seepage pits shall be pumped and filled. Inspection shall be made by the City Building Official prior to covering. Relative compaction of ninety percent (90%) is required for fill areas outside of existing or proposed City rights-of-way. All areas within existing and/or proposed City rights-of-way, relative compaction of ninety-five percent (95%) is required.

Water supply wells shall be destroyed by a State Licensed C-57 Contractor in accordance with the requirements herein. A permit must be obtained from the Building Division before destroying any well. These above requirements shall be noted on the subdivision construction improvement plans.

37. The Developer shall remove any and all underground storage tank(s) existing on the property in accordance with the requirements of the County of Fresno Health Department and other applicable agencies. The Building Official must verify either the nonexistence of such tanks or the appropriate abandonment and/or removal, and provided with the copies of the Health Department certification prior to the issuance of building permits.

38. The Developer shall abandon any existing water service and sewer service laterals to the parcel(s) if the laterals will not be used for the new development. Abandoned water services shall be capped at the mains and abandoned sewer services shall be capped at the property line in accordance with City of Reedley standards and policies. All proposed service abandonments are to be verified and completed in the presence of the City's Engineering or Public Works staff.

39. The Developer shall file a preliminary soil analysis and report, as required by Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code, with the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall have the authority to require Developer to take such corrective action or make such improvements as the City Engineer may determine necessary to prevent structural defects. The soil classification report must be submitted to the Building Official for approval for the building pads prior to the issuance of a building permit(s). Such report shall address soil bearing capacity, effects of moisture variation on soil bearing capacity, compressibility and expansiveness. No grading shall commence until a soil engineering report is submitted and approved by the City and a grading permit is obtained from the City of Reedley Building Official. All grades and property stakes (corners) shall be in place prior to obtaining building permits.

40. If applicable, the Developer shall also comply with the Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region Order No. 5-00-175 construction activity requirements for all water discharges into the City's storm drain collection system, resulting from , but not limited to, pressure testing, leakage testing and disinfecting .

41. If applicable, Developer shall file a Notice of Intent to comply with the terms of the general discharge of storm water associated with construction activity (SWRCB Order No. 2022-0057-DWQ NPDES No. CAS000002) consistent with the requirements of the federal Clean Water Act. Developer shall also have a qualified professional prepare a site-specific Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for this project and submit to the City Engineer, along with the Notice of Intent, for review of compliance before any Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026

construction begins. A copy of the SWPPP shall be made available at the construction site at all times.

42. The Developer shall incorporate dust and erosion control measures into the construction phase of the project according to the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District requirements. The City Engineer shall review and approve said measures prior to the issuance of building permits. Developer's contractor shall take all reasonable precautions to prevent silt and other sedimentation from entering the City of Reedley's storm drainage and sewer systems. Such precautions should generally conform to "California Storm Water Best Management Practice Handbooks" prepared by California Stormwater Quality Association (CASQA). Such precautions shall be noted or shown on the off-site and on-site construction improvements plans and are subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The Developer shall make all reasonable efforts to incorporate post-construction storm water control measures into the final design of the project.

43. The number and locations of proposed residential driveway approaches within this development, including entrance and exit, shall be approved by the City Engineer. All proposed concrete driveway approaches shall conform to the standard residential type approach, City of Reedley Standard Plan ST-18, and shall be ADA compliant.

Pedestrian easements shall be required at driveway locations that extend the sidewalk outside of dedicated rights of way.

44. With the final submittal of construction improvement plans for this project, the Developer's engineer shall deliver to the City Engineer two (2) bond sets of the project civil improvement construction plans, and shall include a digital copy of the complete project plans, to include civil improvement construction and grading & drainage plans which shall include public utilities improvement plans.

45. All buildings and structures shall be located outside of existing or proposed easements.

46. Prior to issuance a Notice of Completion or Certificate of Occupancy, the Developer's engineer shall provide a certified statement stating that all grades shown on the approved construction improvement plans have been constructed to grade. Any discrepancies in grade shall be noted and corrections made on "AS BUil T" plans for review and approval by the City Engineer. In addition, the Developer's engineer shall deliver a digital file (in Civil 30 format) of the project's civil plans drawn to the City's Horizontal datum, NAD83(2007NSRS), to the City Engineer.

47. The location and type of mailboxes to be installed with this development shall be shown on the improvement plans. Developer shall contact the United States Postal Service (USPS) for approval of location and type of mailboxes prior to installation. The Developer shall, at their own expense, procure, construction and install all mail receptacle facilities for each location as specified and approved by the USPS. It is recommended that the Developer contact the local USPS representative at least 6 months prior to the first occupancy to execute a Mode of Delivery Agreement for New Construction
Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026

48. The Subdivider/Developer shall furnish to the City acceptable security to guarantee the construction of the off-site street improvements in accordance with all applicable provisions of the Reedley Municipal Code and the Subdivision Map Act. The Subdivider/Developer shall complete all the public improvements prior to the approval of the Parcel Map by the City. If, at the time of Parcel Map approval, any public improvements have not been completed and accepted in accordance with the standards of the City, the Subdivider/Developer may elect to enter into an agreement with the City to thereafter guarantee the completion of the improvements.

49. All of the conditions of approval must be completed prior to the final inspection and/or the issuance of a "Certificate of Occupancy" by the Building Official.

Mapping

50. All block corners, lot corners and street centerlines shall be monumented as per Subdivision Map Act, City of Reedley Standard Plans ST-41 and ST-42 and City Specifications dated October 2019. At project completion a monument inspection fee of $200.00, or current fee at time of completion, shall be paid and the monuments shall be inspected for the map.
51 . Tentative Parcel Map No. 2026-01 must be recorded with the County of Fresno prior to the issuance of building permit(s).

52. An estimate deposit for final parcel map checking in the amount of $1,395.00, or current fee at time of submittal according to the City Master Fee Schedule, shall be required with the submittal of the final parcel map to the City of Reedley. The total payment for final parcel map checking and all pertinent fees in accordance with City resolutions, ordinances and policies must be paid in full prior to the final parcel map being taken before the City Council for approval. Three (3) bond copies of the final parcel map, one (1) hard copy of closure calculations, one (1) hard copy of a preliminary title report dated within sixty (60) days of submittal and a digital copy of all hard copy items shall be submitted with the first submittal.

53. Public utilities easements (PUE's), as necessary, shall be dedicated to the City of Reedley. All PUE's shall be shown and noted for dedication on the Parcel map at the locations and widths as required by the Reedley Municipal Code. The relocation of existing utilities necessitated by the required public improvements shall be paid for by the Developer. The Developer is responsible to contact the appropriate utility companies for information.

54. Developer shall dedicate sufficient right of way to the City of Reedley along North Cedar Avenue within the limits of the project for an ultimate width of twenty-five feet (25.0') west of the center line along the easterly limits of the project site.

55. Developer shall dedicate sufficient right of way to the City of Reedley along East Myrtle Avenue within the limits of the project for an ultimate width of thirty feet (30.0') south of the section line along the northerly limits of the project site.

Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026

56. Streets

57. 58.

59. 60.
61 .

62. Developer shall dedicate street right of way or pedestrian easements to the City of Reedley at driveway locations that extend the sidewalk outside of the existing dedicated right of way.

Construction within street rights-of-way shall be done with proper signing for construction and maintenance work zones in accordance with the California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, most recent edition, and Work Area Traffic Control Handbook requirements. All work shall be in conformance with OSHA and other safety hazard prevention requirements.

Construction within off-site City streets, easements, alleys, and other City rights-of-way shall be subject to encroachment permit issued by the Engineering Department. All paving, repaving, and patching shall be done to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The travel-way surface shall be restored to provide a safe travel-way within the City streets.

A slurry seal shall be required to provide continuity for re-paved areas with original street cross-section. The travel-way surface shall be restored to provide a safe travel-way within the City street area. All proposed trench patches within East Myrtle Avenue and East Elm Avenue shall be patched as per City Standard Plan ST-46, Section "A" Detail.

All streets within the limits of the development shall be fully constructed to current City & ADA standards including curb ramp, sidewalk, curb, gutter, driveway approaches, permanent asphalt concrete paving, and street name, advisory and regulatory signs and streetlights as directed by the City Engineer. Existing broken or not to grade (ADA noncompliant) curb ramp, sidewalk, curb, gutters, and driveway approaches within the limits of this project shall be removed by the Developer and reconstructed to City Standards.

The travel-way surface shall be restored to provide a safe travel-way within the City street area.

North Cedar Avenue shall be reconstructed as a local residential street within the limits of the project as follows: eighteen feet (18') west of the center line to the face of curb with an additional seven feet (7') west of the face of curb for sidewalk and landscaping per City Standard ST-3. Curb ramps shall be installed at the southwest corner of East Myrtle Avenue and North Cedar Avenue and at the northwest corner of East Elm Avenue and North Cedar Avenue per City Standard ST-13. The existing storm drain inlet and storm _drain piping at the northwest corner of East Elm Avenue and North Cedar Avenue will need to be relocated to accommodate the required improvements.

East Elm Avenue shall have five foot (5') sidewalks installed within the limits of the project per City Standard ST-8 and ST-11 .

A drainage water test shall be performed under the supervision of the City's Engineering Inspector on all curb and gutter lengths installed within the limits of the proposed project prior to the acceptance of public improvements by the City of Reedley.

General Utilities

63. All Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) transformers shall be installed in accordance with the Reedley Municipal Code. In addition, the Developer shall coordinate with PG&E to Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026

64. 65.

Water

66. 67.

68. 69.

70. ensure that all utility boxes and other facilities are installed in accordance with City policies and standards. No new power poles shall be installed to service the development.

Public utility plans and common trench utility plans for gas, electric, telephone and cable TV shall be prepared by the Developer's public utility engineer and submitted with the subdivision improvement plans for review and comment by the City Engineer.

Ingress/egress rights shall be provided to the City for its employees and equipment to enter upon the property for the purpose of inspections related to water and sewer system maintenance.

In accordance with City ordinances and resolutions, install water service assemblies with water meter and box within the City right-of-way per City of Reedley Water Standard Plan Drawings and Specifications and any amendments thereto as directed by the City Engineer. Water service(s) shall be installed at the time of issuance of building permit(s).

The size and location of proposed water service(s) shall be noted on the construction improvement plans. The water services for this development shall connect to the existing 8-inch water mains located in East Myrtle Avenue and East Elm Avenue. Any trench patches in the existing roadway shall be patched as per City Standard Plan ST-46, Section "A" Detail.

In accordance with City ordinances and resolutions, the Developer shall install water service assemblies with water meter, box and reduced pressure backflow preventer within the City right-of-way per City Water Standard Plan Drawings and Specifications of the City of Reedley.

All connections to the existing City of Reedley water system must be made in the presence of a City employee authorized by the Public Works Department to inspect water connections. All connections must be cleaned and disinfected to the satisfaction of the City of Reedley. In the event a City employee is not present to witness the connection, all connection operations must be terminated and the contractor or Developer will be required to show proof that the proper cleaning and disinfection procedures were taken to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Otherwise, remedial action such as flushing, cleaning of lines by polyurethane pigs, or other actions may be required by the City Engineer.

The standard location for water service laterals shall be located horizontally ten feet (1 O') from sewer service lateral. All water service lateral locations shall be shown and stationed on the construction improvement plans. Said services shall not be located within driveway approaches.

Water service(s) shall be installed at the time of issuance of building permit(s). The size and location of proposed water service(s) shall be noted on the construction improvement plans.

Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026

71. Backflow preventers shall be tested and certified prior to the utilization of water. The owner shall have the proposed backflow preventer tested (repaired if required) by a certified backflow plumber on a yearly basis at their expense and the results submitted to City of Reedley Public Works Department.

72. On-site water system shall be sized and designed so as to meet development demands as approved by the City of Reedley Fire Chief and City Engineer.

73. Upon building permit issuance, the necessary water meter(s) for the project shall be purchased and ordered from the City of Reedley. Larger sized water meters may require an extended lead time. The water meter(s) and anti-siphon device must be installed on each service line prior to utilization of water for any reason from the water service lines.

An anti-siphon device is not necessary where a backflow preventer is required.

74. The Developer's contractor must apply for an Encroachment Permit Application and hydrant meter from the Public Works Department prior to any usage of water. Water trucks or water wagons must have appropriate air gap or Reduced Pressure Backflow prevention devices.

75. Any existing water service lateral that will not be used for the new development that extends to the parcel shall be abandoned at the water main.

Sewer

76. Sanitary sewer facilities and services shall be installed in accordance with the Standard Plans and Specifications of the City of Reedley and any amendments thereto as directed by the City Engineer. The size and location of proposed sewer services shall be noted on the construction improvement plans. The services for this development shall connect to the existing 8-inch sewer mains in East Myrtle Avenue and East Elm Avenue. Any trench patches in the existing roadway shall be patched as per City Standard Plan ST46, Section "A" Detail.

77. Sanitary sewer facilities and services shall be installed in accordance with the Standard Plans and Specifications of the City of Reedley. The size and location of proposed sewer service shall be noted on the construction improvement plans.

78. The standard location for sewer service lateral shall be located horizontally ten feet (1 O') from water service lateral. All sewer service lateral locations shall be shown and stationed on the construction improvement plans. Said services shall not be located within driveway approaches.

79. Any private sewer facilities located within the subject property(s) shall be removed.

80. Any existing sewer service lateral that will not be used for the new development that extends to the parcel shall be abandoned at the property line.

Conditions of Approval
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
July 16, 2026

Grading & Drainage
81 . Developer shall submit to the City Engineer for review and approval a grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer employed by the Developer for site drainage grades in accordance with applicable standards.

82. No on-site surface drainage shall be allowed to drain over sidewalk, driveways or onto adjacent property.

OUTSIDE AGENCY REQUIREMENTS

83. Kings Canyon Unified School District: Developer shall provide to the City written certification of payment of Kings Canyon Unified School District facilities fees prior to the issuance of building permits. New development on the subject property will be subject to the fee in place at the time school facilities are paid. See Attachment 3.

84. County of Fresno Regional Transportation Mitigation Fees (RTMF): Acknowledgment of RTMF fees shall be signed prior to issuance of building permits. Regional traffic impact fees shall be paid (if required) prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. See Attachment 4.

85. Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E): Development shall take place in accordance with the comment letter provided by Pacific Gas and Electric Company dated April 27, 2026 and April 20, 2026. See Attachment 5.

86. If archaeological and/or animal fossil material is encountered during project surveying, grading, excavating, or construction, work shall stop immediately. If there are suspected human remains, the Fresno County Coroner Division shall be immediately contacted at (559) 600-3400. If remains or other archaeological material is possibly Native American in origin, the Native American Heritage Commission (phone number (916) 653-4082) shall be immediately contacted, and the California Archaeological Inventory/Southern San Joaquin Valley Information Center (phone number (805) 644-2289) shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized archaeologists.

If animal fossils are uncovered, the Museum of Paleontology at the University of California, Berkeley shall be contacted to obtain a referral list of recognized paleontologists. An assessment shall be conducted by a paleontologist; if the paleontologist determines the material to be significant, a recommendation shall be made to the City as to any further site investigation or preservation measures.

Enclosures: RZ 2026-01 Exhibit A
TPM 2026-01 Exhibit A, dated April 14, 2026
Attachment 1: CFO Resolution and Sample Petition
Attachment 2: Construction Hours Handout
Attachment 3: Kings Canyon Unified School District Developer Fee Certification Form
Attachment 4: RTMF Fee Acknowledgment and Fee Information Attachment 5: PG&E Comment Letters dated April 27, 2026 and April 20, 2026 Project Information
APN(s): 370-356-06
City of Reedley
Ordinance No. 2026-002
Rezone Application No. 2026-01
Exhibit A
ADDRESS: 1533 East Myrtle Ave, Reedley, CA
Existing Zoning Designation:

MDR
Location Map
Proposed Zoning Designation:

R-1-6
0 200 400 800 Feet
Legend
':.-:. Subject Property City of Reedley Zone Districts
r.::J Reedley City Limits c=J Residential Estate (RE)
c=) Low Density Residential SP (R-l(SP))
c=J Low Density Residential (R-1-6)
c=J Low Density Residential (R-1-7)
c=J Low Density Residential (R-1-9)
Medium Density Residential (MDR)
High Density Residential (HDR)
C:J Neighborhood Commercial (CN)
- Central and Community Commercial (CC)
- Service Commercial (CS)
Professional Office (PO)
C=:J Light Industrial (ML)
Heavy Industrial (MH)
- Resource Conservation and Open Space (RCO)
[=:J Urban Reserve (UR)
tS2S2I P (Planned Unit Development) Overlay

NOR THEAST CORNER OF SECTTON
26, T. 15S., R.2JE., MO.B.kM
7 FOUND FRESNO COUNTY BRASS
CAP MONUMENT, STAMPfO PLS
7027, FLUS~
663~ ---t- ~ \ - -
~~~ / 1-~
l
~ ;!; 11 ;,;
~~'!;
-------+
S0"24'06"W l.316.92'
--- - - +- - -- - - --- - - --- - - --- - - --- - - --- - - ~OF ~£~IN_GS __ EXHIBIT: A
APP#: TPM 2026-01 -------------
DATE: 04/14/2026
APPROVED:

RI E C E V E
APR 14 2026 ID

CITY OF REEDLEY

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT
_ _____ --~-----/'- __ s_o·2•~s-~ 1316.ao· - .,
J PDSrTION FOR NORTHEAST EAS

OF T SE
QU
CTION ARTER 25, CORNER T. 1!5S., J CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST R. 2JE., MD.8.&::M.

OUART[R or f.'·ff FOUND SCR/9£ ON NOR THE AS T QUAR fER OF MANHOLE WITH TICS SECTION 26, T. 15£., R.23E., MA TCHING CORN[R
VICINITY MAP:

M. D.B.&M. RECORD BOBO
i "·
MANNl 'l G A V[NU[

SITE LOCA T/ON
£. N YRTl.[ AVENU[
[ ELM AVENUE
E'. NORTI--' AV[NU[
SITE INFORMATION:

EXISTING ZONING
MEDIUM OfNSt f Y RESIDENTIAL (MOR)

EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE

LOW DENSITY RESIOEN TIAL

PROPOSED ZONING
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (R-1-6)

EXISTING LAND USE
Rf.SJDEN flAL

PROPOSED LAND USE
RESIDENflAL
ASSESSOR"S PARCEL NUMBER
370- .345-06

SITE ADDRESS
U I ACRES ± (GROSS)

1.0 ACR[S ± (NET)

SITE ADDRESS
l 53J EAST MYRTl[ AVENUE
REEDLEY. CA 93654
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: TI-IE \'/[ST l / 2 OF LOT iO OF ORANG[ SUBDIVISION, IN THE C!fY OF REEDLEY,
COUNTY or FRESN O, SfAT"E OF CALIFORNIA,
ACCORDING ro TH[ MAP Tl--fEREOf RECORO[D
IN BOOK 7 PAG£ 1 i OF RECORD OF SURVEYS.

FRESNO COUNTY RECORDS.

LOT INFO:

TOiAL MAX AREA MIN. /\Rf.A /,VG. AREA
4 iJ,079 SF r; , 04-Q SF 12,059. 5 S"
PREPARED BY:

YAMABE &: HORN ENGINE[R/NG, INC.
2985 N. BURL AV£, SUITE 101
rR[SNO, CALIFORNIA t;iJ72 7
PH. (559) 21.4 - 3123
OWNER:

ISMAH VALD(Z, A S!NGL[ MAN
2J r9 Wf.SST[ R S TRffT
SANGER, CA 93657
PH.(559)903- 846J
NT
I
S

TENTATIVE PARCEL
MAP NO. 2026-01 THE WES T HALF LOT 10 OF MAP OF ORANGE SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN VOLUME 7
OF RECORD OF SURVEYS AT PAGE 11 , FRESNO COUNTY
RECORDS. SITUATED IN TI-IE NORTHEAST QUAR TER OF THE
NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 15 SOUTH,
RANGE 2.3 EAST, MOUNT DIABLO BASE AND MERIDIAN.

LEGEND:
•
•
-i;t•,- -
SHEET 1 OF 1

FOUND MONUUENTADON AS NOTED
GRANTED JN EASCM~N T FOR

RIGHT- OF- WAY PURPOSES PER
DOCW.l[ NT RECORDED JJN[ 28, 2002,
AS DOC. NO. 2002- 0i078.; 7, O.P..r .c
CRANT[ O !N EAS[i,,4£"/H FOR SiORM
DRAIN PURPOSES P£R DOCUM[NT
R[ COROCD AUGus r 18, 1934, AS DOC.

NO 94- 129270. O.R.F.C.
';;!~~~~ i~.OJ~:~oRrc~~~:ARK 800K 5 7 AT PAC£ 7.!. F C.R 0[OICA rro Pf:R MAP OF TRAC T t:0. 526J
MONjf VISTA ESTA T[S AS R[COROCO !N
BOOK 79 AT PA('.[ 85-86 Qr' PLATS
r.c.R.
0[0/CA rro P£R MAP OF ORANG£
SUBDIVISION AS Rt:"CORD=D IN BOOK 7
or REC ORD or SVRVCYS Ai PAGE r 1.

F.C. R.

UM/TS or SUBJEC r PROPERTY
£X/Sf/NG S(CnCN UN(
[XISflNG PRO=>(RTY / RIGHT-OF-WAY
LINE
EXIST/NG C[N if.R LINE
£XISTING [AS(MEN T
EXISTING CUR3 & GUTT[!=<
PROPOS£0 PARCH LINE

EXISTING STORM DRAIN U NE

EXISDNG SEWER UNE
- EX/STTNG WATER UN£
EX/STTNG IRRIGA nON UN£
[XISTTNG CAS U N£
-·- EXIS TING CO,..,-tMUN /CA TION LINE
£XIS TTNG FENCE (CHAIN UNKJ
£XISDNG CONCRETE
[XISnNG STRE(r LICH T
[XISnNG TREE
() [X/Sf/NG SANl rAAY SEWER MANHOLE
Q) £XISDNG STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
P [XISflNG STORM DRAlN INLET
[XISftNG FlRE HYDRANT
EX/Sf/NG WA ER HOS£ 918
[X/Sf/NG UNDERGROUND MARKER
EX/S nNG CA rv SOX
EX/SnNC ELECTRIC SOX
Ex:snNG STR[£r LfGHf SOX
7 EX/STING WATER METER
CONO ELECTRI C COf,,'DUIT
5D01 STOf?M DRAIN INLET
50""1H STO.-?M DRAIN MAN.'·fC;_f
SS'.iH SANITAR Y SEVlfR M AN~ O:.f
SSCO SANITARY S[W[R Cl.£AN OUT
WV WATER VAL vE
$NF SEARCHED F'OR. NOTHING r OUND
O.R.F.C OFFICIAL RfCOROS FRES"-l O cou,-.;ry
F.C.R. rRESNO COUN TY RECORDS
BASIS OF BEARINGS:

GPS (GCOBAL POSITION SYSTEM) BASED WGS 84 (WORLD G£00[TIC S"S:CM CF 1984) G[OOEnc, THE EAST UN£ OF THE NORTH YIEST QUARTER OF iHE NORTl""l'WE:ST OUAt;!TER CW S£CTIOJ\' 26 TOVrNSHIP 15 SOU T!-1, RANC£ 23 EAST AS SHOWN ON CITY or REEDLEY RECORD OF SURVEY RECORDED JN SOOK 57 or RECORDS OF SURVEY AT PAGES 4 1 THROUGH <t7, FRESNO COUNTY RECORDS.

TAKEN AS SOUTH 00'24'06• WEST.

FLOOD HAZARD NOTE:

AS DEUNEA TEO ON fH( FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT'S AGENCY FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NO. 0 60 19C25SSH FOR COMMUNITY NO 060053 COUN TY Of FRESNO, STA iE Of CAUfOR.N!A. ~\HH AN ErFECnVE DATE or ffSRUARY iS, 2009. THE PROP[RTY SHOI\IN ON THIS MAP U[ S WTHIN ZONE X (U HA OEDJ VIHICH ARE ARE'AS OCitRMIN[O TO BC OJTSIDE 1H£ 0.2% ANNU AL CH ANC[ FLOODPLAIN.

Ref. & Rev.
c·
.. u
Cl.5
::c ..
~~ Ill ·-.. .cl Ill
m!
e·-
m=
>!
Cl.
~
ijj
u
ll::
~
~
i=::
~
:c:
~
~
2 ~:,;;
!:;: ~~ ci,: L.>"'
:::i ~ V) ~ J::
a UJ Q <>:>:
:?: .....
-"' :s ~ LU ... ... >--i); . ~i
~ ~~
~7
~ ~~
~~
~ ~
_, ;~ ~ :;::

CJ
LU
:::::,
~ ;,; ~ (,C)
<"')
-:c 0)
~~ 1-- >-~ ~ LU ~...J
. frl
LU LU
~ a= IO
....
z
0 ti:
a'.
~ 0
,-
w
w
I
<f)
Or. By: __ J_P _ _
Ch. By: __ A_B _ _
Scale As Noted
YH Job No. 25-328
Sheet No. __ 1 _
of _ _ 1 _ Sheets
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-013

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY DETERMINING SPECIAL TAX RATES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026-27 FOR THE CITY OF REEDLEY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 2005-1 (PUBLIC

SERVICES)
WHEREAS, in proceedings heretofore conducted by this Council pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the "Law"), this Council on November 8, 2005, adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Reedley Declaring Results of Special Election and Directing Recording of Notice of Special Tax Lien" finalizing the formation of the City of Reedley Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) (the "District") pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, California Government Code Section 53311 et seq. (the "Law"); WHEREAS, the City Clerk executed and caused to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Fresno a notice of special tax lien in the form required by the Law.

WHEREAS, Maximum Special Tax Rates were established as follows:

Category I includes each Developed Parcel within the District for which a building permit has been issued prior to July 1 of the current Fiscal Year. Said Maximum Special Tax shall increase each Fiscal Year thereafter by an inflation factor which is the Annual All Urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward area.

The Maximum Special Tax that may be levied annually on Taxable Property in Category I beginning with the Fiscal Year starting July 1, 2026 ending June 30, 2027 is as set forth in Table 1 below.

TABLE 1
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATES FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

CATEGORY I

DEVELOPMENT TYPE MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE
Single Fami ly Residential $1,299.67
(per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family Residential $ 965.97
(per dwelling unit)
Non-Residential $ 0.35
(per gross building square foot)
Affordable Housing $ 649.84
(per dwelling unit)
Infill Non-Residential $ 0.18
(per building square foot)
Category II includes each Parcel within the District that is not included in Category I.

The Maximum Special Tax that may be levied annually on Taxable Property in Category II beginning with the Fiscal Year starting July 1, 2026 ending June 30, 2027 is as set forth in Table 2 below per Net Developable Acre (said amount to be levied prorata for any portion of an acre). Said special tax shall increase each Fiscal Year thereafter by an inflation factor which is the Annual All Urban Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward area.

TABLE 2
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

CATEGORY II
Special Tax Per Net Developable Acre
$ 1,053.79 per acre
2 ]

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY AS FOLLOWS:

1. The following Special Tax Rates shall be levied for the ensuing 2026-27 fiscal year on all eligible properties in the District per the Rate and Method of Special Tax.

ADOPTED SPECIAL TAX RATES FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

CATEGORY I

DEVELOPMENT TYPE SPECIAL TAX RATE
Single Family Residential $1,106.91
(per dwelling unit)
Multi-Family Residential $ 824.15
(per dwellinQ unit)
Non-Residential $ 0.30
(per gross building square foot)
Affordable Housing $ 558.63
(per dwellinQ unit)
Infill Non-Residential $ 0.15
(per building square foot)
ADOPTED SPECIAL TAX RATE FISCAL YEAR 2026-27

CATEGORY II
Special Tax Per Net Developable Acre
$ 898.86 per acre

2. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.

This Resolution was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council of the City of Reedley this 10th day of March 2026 by the following vote:

AYES: Fast, Crutchfield, Arriaga, Friesen, Tuttle.

NOES: None.

ABSENT: None.

ABSTAIN: None.

Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
3 PETITION AND WAIVER

REGARDING PROCEEDINGS FOR ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO A

COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT
To the Honorable City Council
City of Reedley
1733 9th Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Re: Community Fac-·li ies District No. 2005-1 (Public Services) Annexation No.

Members of the City Council:

1. To pr:oceec as quickly as possible with the annexation to the CFO, the ..._._,,, levy of sai special tax, and it being further understood that, there being fewer than twelve registered voters residing within the area to be annexed to the CFO, the undersigned being the only expected qualified elector(s) for the annexation, hereby waives all otherwise applicable time periods for the election and notices of the conduct by you of the election under the Act, including all ballot arguments and analysis under the Act.

3. In furtherance of this waiver, the election may be conducted by mailed or hand delivered ballot to be returned as quickly as possible to the City Clerk of the City and that the results of said election be canvassed and reported to you as soon as possible.

Respectfully submitted as of this
The properties that are the subject of this
Petition are Fresno County Assessor Parcel
No(s):
and the propett£.£2ntains a total of
approximately-acres
ayof 2023 by:

The address of the above owner for
purposes of Receiving all notices and
ballots is:

Indicate if different:

Proposed Boundary
The parcel map below shows and to be
annexed into Community Facilities District No. 2005-1 (Public Services).

Tnnil} p3ck1ng 9
acJac
9 IJ)
. .,
'" :?-
,.

LI
u
LL
' "'
, . .,,
1h
E :··uC:3 .!. ~
Construction Work Hours
City of Reedley
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93654
(559) 637-4200
http://www. reed ley. com
Excavation, demolition, alteration or repair of any building or structure at any time other than during the following hours, except by special permit granted by the Community Development Director or City Engineer:
• Monday - Friday 7:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
• Saturday 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
• Sunday Not Allowed
• Holidays (as listed below) 8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
o New Year's Day (January 1 );
o Memorial Day (the last Monday in May);
o Labor Day (the first Monday in September);
o Thanksgiving Day (the fourth Thursday in November);
o Christmas Day (December 25);
o Monday, when New Year's Day or Christmas Day Falls on the preceding Sunday; and
o Friday, when New Year's Day or Christmas Day Falls on the succeeding Saturday.

To apply for a special permit to operate outside of the hours listed above, contact:

City of Reedley Building Division - (559)637-4200 ext. 225 OR
City of Reedley Engineering Department- (559)637-4200 ext. 295 Fees payable to:

DEVELOPER FEE CERTIFICATION

KINGS CANYON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT

BUSINESS OFFICE
1801 10th St, Reedley CA 93654
Mailing address: 1502 I St, Reedley CA 93654
(559) 305-7010 FAX: (559) 637-1186
Date: SUBDIVISION NO. __________ _ LOT NO _______ _
OWNER/ DEVELOPER:

TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT:

Name:
0SFR ODuplex OTriplex QPUD
Address
Contact Person:

Telephone:
0 Apartment Complex [number of units]
0 Mobile Home
0 Other
0 Addition to SFR
DEVELOPMENT FEE APPLICABLE TO THE PROJECT: [check one]
(!)Government Code Section 65995(b)(1 ): Residential Development:
0 Government Code Section 65995(b)(2): Commercial or Industrial:
______ square feet@ $5.17 sq. ft.= ________ _
square feet @ $0.84 sq. ft. = ------ ----------
Mini storage square feet@ $0.15 sq. ft.=
Development Address:
-----------------------------------------
Kings Canyon Unified School District certifies that the above fees have been PAID IN FULL Kings Canyon Unified School District certifies that the above project is EXEMPT from the above fees because
NOTICE: Pursuant to Assembly Bill 3081 (CHAP 549, STATS. 1996), this will serve to notify you that the 90-day period in which you may protest the fee or other payment identified above will begin to run from the date the fee is paid to the District, unless the fee was imposed by a City or County as a condition of your projects approval, in which case, the 90 day protest period began at the time your project was approved. You have 180 days from the k:lelivery of the notice to file an action.

KCUSD Contact Persons: Linda Doi (559) 305-7097, Carolyn Foster (559) 305-7035 or Janet Salinas (559) 305-7032 O City ofReedley
Community Dev Dep't
1733 9th Street
Reedley, CA 93654
(559) 637-4200
O City of Orange Cove
Building Dept
633 Sixth Street
Orange Cove, CA 93646
(559) 626-4488
0 Fresno County
Dev Services Division
2220 Tulare, 6th Floor
Fresno, CA 93721
(559) 600-4560
0 Tulare County
Resource Management Agency
5961 S. Mooney Blvd.

Visalia, CA 93277
(559) 624-7000
Unless an even shorter time is specified herein, this certificate is valid only if the permit to which it applies is actually issued no more than 180 days after its date.

District Signature KCUSD
Cc: City/County Owner/Developer KCUSD
Revised 7-29-2024
The information given below is intended to provide general guidance related to the RTMF and is not intended to be, nor is, legal advice. Applicants for developments that might be subject to the RTMF should submit the details of their project to the RTMF Joint Powers Agency for determination of the amount due, if any.

INFORMATIONAL SUMMARY

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE
Background: Measure "C" Extension, passed by the voters of Fresno County in November 2006, included a provision for the establishment of a Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee (RTMF). The purpose of the fee is to create a mechanism for new development to pay its fair share of the cost of road improvements based on the expected traffic impacts generated by the development.

Date of Effectiveness: The RTMF is effective for all developments approved on or after January -1, 2010, unless the development is exempt for of one of the reasons described below.

Developments Subiect to the Fee: Generally, all new developments occurring in Fresno County are required to pay the RTMF, with amounts varying based on the expected traffic impact of the development, less the development falls into one or more of the following exempt categories:
a) The development is to be used for public or non-profit education b) The development is for use by a government agency for a governmental function (government-owned commercial developments are not exempt) c) The development is the subject of an unexpired tentative map, vested tentative map, or subdivision map approved prior to January 1, 2010. d) Renovations or improvements to existing residential buildings are exempt if the number of dwelling units is not increased. Renovations or improvements to existing non-residential buildings are exempt if the floor space is not increased.

Payment of the Fee: The RTMF must be paid to the RTMF Joint Powers Agency, located at 2035 Tulare Street, Suite 201, Fresno, CA. Please call ahead to (559) 233- 4148, extension 200, to ensure that staff will be on hand to process your payment. The amount to be paid is based on the number and type of dwelling unit(s) if any, and the square footage of floorspace and type of non-residential building(s) if any. The rate to be paid is the rate in effect at the time of payment.

Payment may be made at any time prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy. A Record of Payment will be issued as proof that the RTMF obligations, if any, have been met. Developments exempt under points A, B, or C above require a Record of Payment , from the RTMF Joint Powers Agency, even though the amount paid will be zero. A service fee may be charged for issuance of a Record of Payment.

I acknowledge that I have read and understand this information, and am aware that the City or County will not issue a certificate of occupancy until I have fulfilled my obligations, if any, regarding the RTMF.

Representative of the Applicant Date

RECORD OF PAYMENT OF REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE

REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION MITIGATION FEE JOINT POWERS AGENCY 2035 Tulare Street, Suite 201, Fresno, CA 93721
(559) 233-4148, ext. 200 www.fresnocog.org

APPLICANT PROJECT
Name: ___ ____ _ ___ __ _ Job Site Address _ ____ __ _
Contact Person: _ _ _____ ___ _ Tract Number _ _______ _ Address: ______ _ _____ _ Lot/Parcel Number _ _____ _
Building Permit Number _ _ __ _
Telephone Number: _ ____ ____ _ Building Permit Issued ___ __ _ DATE Final Map Recorde _ _____ _ DATE
Parcel Map, Tentative Map filed, Deemed Complete by Agency _____ _ DATE Rezone Approval ( attach relevant documents if applicable) ~~---- DATE
Government
Commercial/Retail
Commercial/Office/Service
Industrial
Other Non-Residential
25 .00
Check# Total Amount Due - ---- ---
Applicant Date
Representative of Permit Issuing Agency Date Issuing Agency

DISPOSITION OF RTMF
___ RTMF Joint Powers Agency certifies that the above fees have been PAID IN FULL _ __ RTMF Joint Powers Agency certifies that the above project is EXEMPT from the requirement to pay the RTMF because _ _______________ _ Representative of the RTMF JPA Date
Note: The fees shown are those in effect as of March 1, 2020. Fees are subject to change. The amounts due will be based on the fees in effect on the day the fee is paid.

This form must be validated by the Fresno County Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee Joint Powers Agency and returned to the Permit Issuing Agency prior to final inspection or certificate of occupancy.

NOTICE OF THE RIGHT TO APPEAL
You have the right to appeal the application of the RTMF to the Board of the RTMF Joint Powers Agency if you feel that the RTMF is being applied incorrectly. The procedure to file an appeal is:
1) The Applicant must first tender any required payment in full or provide satisfactory evidence of arrangements to pay the fee when due or ensure performance of the conditions necessary to meet the requirements of the imposition (Gov. Code§ 66020(a)(1 )). The JPA shall determine if the requirement under Gov. Code§ 66020(a)(1)) has been satisfied. 2) The applicant then submits a letter to the JPA stating that payment was tendered or shall be tendered under protest along with the reasons they believe that the fee as calculated by JPA staff is not justified, and the amount of fee the applicant believes to be correct. This letter must be accompanied by a copy of the Record of Payment. The appeal must be filed within 90 days after the imposition of the fee (Gov. Code § 66020 (d)(1 )). Failure to file a timely appeal will preclude a subsequent lawsuit.
3) . If the appeal is based on some document other than the Record of Payment, such as a document issued by a local jurisdiction indicating the starting date of vesting rights or a document showing earlier payments for which the applicant wants credit, then copies of this document must be included in the ad,ditional documentation mentioned in the previous bullet point. The Applicant has the option to submit additional documentation to support their appeal.

The Applicant must submit at their own expense twenty-two copies of each supporting document they want considered. The copies are for the use of the JPA and will not be returned to the applicant.
4) If the appeal is based on a technical issue related to traffic or trip generation then . the Applicant must submit a technical analysis for consideration by the JPA. The Applicant is responsible for the cost of this analysis. 5) The RTMF-JPA will act on appeals during the open portion of a Board meeting within 180 days of receipt of the written appeal. The Applicant will have a chance to speak on behalf of their request and to answer questions. Based on its consideration of the appeal, the Board may choose to set the RTMF for the Applicant's project at the amount stated in the appeal, the amount recommended by Staff based on the RTMF as generally applied, or some other amount deemed appropriate based on the information presented in the Appeal.

If you challenge the applicability or amount of the RTMF in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described above or in written correspondence delivered to the JPA at, or prior to, the public hearing.

Pacific Gas and
Electric Company
April 27, 2026
Laura Friesen
City of Reedley - Community Development Department
1733 Ninth St
Reedley, CA 93654
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Morgan Bunone
Land Management
300 Lakeside Dr.

Oakland, CA 94612
Re: Rezone Application No. 2026-01 , Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 1533 E Myrtle Ave, Reedley, CA
Dear Laura:

Thank you for providing PG&E with the opportunity to review TPM No. 2026-01 dated 4/9/2026. Our review indicates the design and/or improvements identified on the map(s) does not appear to directly interfere with any of PG&E's existing facilities or land rights.

Please note, this is our preliminary review and PG&E may provide additional comments in the future as the project progresses or if additional information is provided. If there are subsequent modifications made to your design, we ask that the map be resubmitted for review to the email address listed below.

For any requests to modify or relocate PG&E existing facilities, or to request gas and/or electric service, please submit an application to PG&E's Service Planning department through PG&E's Your Project Portal: Sign In (yourprojects-pge.com).

As a reminder, before any digging or excavation occurs, please contact Underground Service Alert (USA) by dialing 811 a minimum of two (2) working days prior to commencing any work.

This free and independent service will ensure that all existing underground utilities are identified and marked on-site.

If you have any questions regarding this response, please contact me at (925) 459-4787 or [email protected].

Sincerely,
~an, rfj/J)uncwie
Morgan B unone
Land Management
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company
April 20, 2026
Laura Friesen
Assistant Planner
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93654
Ref: Gas and Electric Transmission and Distribution
Dear Laura Friesen,
Plan Review Team
Land Management
PGEPlanReview@pge .com
Thank you for submitting the RZ 2026-01 and TPM 2026-01 project plans for our review. PG&E will review the submitted plans in relationship to any existing Gas and Electric facilities within the project area. If the proposed project is adjacent/or within PG&E owned property and/or easements, we will be working with you to ensure compatible uses and activities near our facilities.

Attached you will find information and requirements as it relates to Gas facilities (Attachment 1) and Electric facilities (Attachment 2). Please review these in detail, as it is critical to ensure your safety and to protect PG&E's facilities and its existing rights.

Below is additional information for your review:

1. This plan review process does not replace the application process for PG&E gas or electric service your project may require. For these requests, please continue to work with PG&E Service Planning: https://www.pge.com/en/account/servicerequests/building-and-renovation.html.

2. If the project being submitted is part of a larger project, please include the entire scope of your project, and not just a portion of it. PG&E's facilities are to be incorporated within any CEQA document. PG&E needs to verify that the CEQA document will identify any required future PG&E services.

3. An engineering deposit may be required to review plans for a project depending on the size, scope, and location of the project and as it relates to any rearrangement or new installation of PG&E facilities.

Any proposed uses within the PG&E fee strip and/or easement, may include a California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) Section 851 filing . This requires the CPUC to render approval for a conveyance of rights for specific uses on PG&E's fee strip or easement. PG&E will advise if the necessity to incorporate a CPUC Section 851filing is required.

This letter does not constitute PG&E's consent to use any portion of its easement for any purpose not previously conveyed . PG&E will provide a project specific response as required.

Sincerely,
Plan Review Team
Land Management
PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 1
Internal
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company
Attachment 1 - Gas Facilities
There could be gas transmission pipelines in this area which would be considered critical facilities for PG&E and a high priority subsurface installation under California law. Care must be taken to ensure safety and accessibility. So, please ensure that if PG&E approves work near gas transmission pipelines it is done in adherence with the below stipulations. Additionally, the following link provides additional information regarding legal requirements under California excavation laws: https://www.usanorth811.org/images/pdfs/CA-LAW-2018.pdf

1. Standby Inspection: A PG&E Gas Transmission Standby Inspector must be present during any demolition or construction activity that comes within 10 feet of the gas pipeline. This includes all grading, trenching, substructure depth verifications (potholes), asphalt or concrete demolition/removal, removal of trees, signs, light poles, etc. This inspection can be coordinated through the Underground Service Alert (USA) service at 811. A minimum notice of 48 hours is required. Ensure the USA markings and notifications are maintained throughout the duration of your work.

2. Access: At any time, PG&E may need to access, excavate, and perform work on the gas pipeline. Any construction equipment, materials, or spoils may need to be removed upon notice.

Any temporary construction fencing installed within PG&E's easement would also need to be capable of being removed at any time upon notice. Any plans to cut temporary slopes exceeding a 1 :4 grade within 10 feet of a gas transmission pipeline need to be approved by PG&E Pipeline Services in writing PRIOR to performing the work.

3. Wheel Loads: To prevent damage to the buried gas pipeline, there are weight limits that must be enforced whenever any equipment gets within 10 feet of traversing the pipe.

Ensure a list of the axle weights of all equipment being used is available for PG&E's Standby Inspector. To confirm the depth of cover, the pipeline may need to be potholed by hand in a few areas.

Due to the complex variability of tracked equipment, vibratory compaction equipment, and cranes, PG&E must evaluate those items on a case-by-case basis prior to use over the gas pipeline (provide a list of any proposed equipment of this type noting model numbers and specific attachments).

No equipment may be set up over the gas pipeline while operating. Ensure crane outriggers are at least 10 feet from the centerline of the gas pipeline. Transport trucks must not be parked over the gas pipeline while being loaded or unloaded.

4. Grading: PG&E requires a minimum of 36 inches of cover over gas pipelines (or existing grade if less) and a maximum of 7 feet of cover at all locations. The graded surface cannot exceed a cross slope of 1 :4.

5. Excavating: Any digging within 2 feet of a gas pipeline must be dug by hand. Note that while the minimum clearance is only 24 inches, any excavation work within 24 inches of the edge of a pipeline must be done with hand tools. So to avoid having to dig a trench entirely with hand tools, the edge of the trench must be over 24 inches away. (Doing the math for a 24 inch PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 2
Interna l
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company
wide trench being dug along a 36 inch pipeline, the centerline of the trench would need to be at least 54 inches [24/2 + 24 + 36/2 = 54] away, or be entirely dug by hand.) Water jetting to assist vacuum excavating must be limited to 1000 psig and directed at a 40° angle to the pipe. All pile driving must be kept a minimum of 3 feet away.

Any plans to expose and support a PG&E gas transmission pipeline across an open excavation need to be approved by PG&E Pipeline Services in writing PRIOR to performing the work.

6. Boring/Trenchless Installations: PG&E Pipeline Services must review and approve all plans to bore across or parallel to (within 10 feet) a gas transmission pipeline. There are stringent criteria to pothole the gas transmission facility at regular intervals for all parallel bore installations.

For bore paths that cross gas transmission pipelines perpendicularly, the pipeline must be potholed a minimum of 2 feet in the horizontal direction of the bore path and a minimum of 24 inches in the vertical direction from the bottom of the pipe with minimum clearances measured from the edge of the pipe in both directions. Standby personnel must watch the locator trace (and every ream pass) the path of the bore as it approaches the pipeline and visually monitor the pothole (with the exposed transmission pipe) as the bore traverses the pipeline to ensure adequate clearance with the pipeline. The pothole width must account for the inaccuracy of the locating equipment.

7. Substructures: All utility crossings of a gas pipeline should be made as close to perpendicular as feasible (90° +/- 15°). All utility lines crossing the gas pipeline must have a minimum of 24 inches of separation from the gas pipeline. Parallel utilities, pole bases, water line 'kicker blocks', storm drain inlets, water meters, valves, back pressure devices or other utility substructures are not allowed in the PG&E gas pipeline easement.

If previously retired PG&E facilities are in conflict with proposed substructures, PG&E must verify they are safe prior to removal. This includes verification testing of the contents of the facilities, as well as environmental testing of the coating and internal surfaces. Timelines for PG&E completion of this verification will vary depending on the type and location of facilities in conflict.

8. Structures: No structures are to be built within the PG&E gas pipeline easement. This includes buildings, retaining walls, fences, decks, patios, carports, septic tanks, storage sheds , tanks, loading ramps, or any structure that could limit PG&E's ability to access its facilities.

9. Fencing: Permanent fencing is not allowed within PG&E easements except for perpendicular crossings which must include a 16 foot wide gate for vehicular access. Gates will be secured with PG&E corporation locks.

10. Landscaping: Landscaping must be designed to allow PG&E to access the pipeline for maintenance and not interfere with pipeline coatings or other cathodic protection systems. No trees, shrubs, brush, vines, and other vegetation may be planted within the easement area.

Only those plants, ground covers, grasses, flowers , and low-growing plants that grow unsupported to a maximum of four feet (4') in height at maturity may be planted within the easement area.

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 3
Internal
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company

11. Cathodic Protection: PG&E pipelines are protected from corrosion with an "Impressed Current" cathodic protection system. Any proposed facilities , such as metal conduit, pipes, service lines, ground rods, anodes, wires, etc. that might affect the pipeline cathodic protection system must be reviewed and approved by PG&E Corrosion Engineering.

12. Pipeline Marker Signs: PG&E needs to maintain pipeline marker signs for gas transmission pipelines in order to ensure public awareness of the presence of the pipelines.

With prior written approval from PG&E Pipeline Services, an existing PG&E pipeline marker sign that is in direct conflict with proposed developments may be temporarily relocated to accommodate construction work. The pipeline marker must be moved back once construction is complete.

13. PG&E is also the provider of distribution facilities throughout many of the areas within the state of California. Therefore, any plans that impact PG&E's facilities must be reviewed and approved by PG&E to ensure that no impact occurs which may endanger the safe operation of its facilities.

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 4
Intern al
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company
Attachment 2 - Electric Facilities
It is PG&E's policy to permit certain uses on a case by case basis within its electric transmission fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) provided such uses and manner in which they are exercised, will not interfere with PG&E's rights or endanger its facilities. Some examples/restrictions are as follows:

1. Buildings and Other Structures: No buildings or other structures including the foot print and eave of any buildings, swimming pools, wells or similar structures will be permitted within fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) areas. PG&E's transmission easement shall be designated on subdivision/parcel maps as "RESTRICTED USE AREA - NO BUILDING."

2. Grading: Cuts, trenches or excavations may not be made within 25 feet of our towers.

Developers must submit grading plans and site development plans (including geotechnical reports if applicable), signed and dated, for PG&E's review. PG&E engineers must review grade changes in the vicinity of our towers. No fills will be allowed which would impair ground-toconductor clearances. Towers shall not be left on mounds without adequate road access to base of tower or structure.

3. Fences: Walls, fences, and other structures must be installed at locations that do not affect the safe operation of PG&'s facilities. Heavy equipment access to our facilities must be maintained at all times. Metal fences are to be grounded to PG&E specifications. No wall, fence or other like structure is to be installed within 10 feet of tower footings and unrestricted access must be maintained from a tower structure to the nearest street. Walls, fences and other structures proposed along or within the fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) will require PG&E review; submit plans to PG&E Centralized Review Team for review and comment.

4. Landscaping: Vegetation may be allowed; subject to review of plans. On overhead electric transmission fee strip(s) and/or easement(s), plant only low-growing shrubs under the wire zone and only grasses within the area directly below the tower. Along the border of the transmission line right-of-way, plant only small trees no taller than 10 feet in height at maturity. PG&E must have access to its facilities at all times, including access by heavy equipment. No planting is to occur within the footprint of the tower legs. Greenbelts are encouraged.

5. Reservoirs, Sumps, Drainage Basins, and Ponds: Prohibited within PG&E's fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) for electric transmission lines.

6. Automobile Parking: Short term parking of movable passenger vehicles and light trucks (pickups, vans, etc.) is allowed. The lighting within these parking areas will need to be reviewed by PG&E; approval will be on a case by case basis. Heavy equipment access to PG&E facilities is to be maintained at all times. Parking is to clear PG&E structures by at least 10 feet.

Protection of PG&E facilities from vehicular traffic is to be provided at developer's expense AND to PG&E specifications. Blocked-up vehicles are not allowed. Carports, canopies, or awnings are not allowed.

7. Storage of Flammable, Explosive or Corrosive Materials: There shall be no storage of fuel or combustibles and no fueling of vehicles within PG&E's easement. No trash bins or incinerators are allowed.

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 5
Internal
Pacific Gas and
Electric Company

8. Streets and Roads: Access to facilities must be maintained at all times. Street lights may be allowed in the fee strip(s) and/or easement(s) but in all cases must be reviewed by PG&E for proper clearance. Roads and utilities should cross the transmission easement as nearly at right angles as possible. Road intersections will not be allowed within the transmission easement.

9. Pipelines: Pipelines may be allowed provided crossings are held to a minimum and to be as nearly perpendicular as possible. Pipelines within 25 feet of PG&E structures require review by PG&E. Sprinklers systems may be allowed; subject to review. Leach fields and septic tanks are not allowed. Construction plans must be submitted to PG&E for review and approval prior to the commencement of any construction .

10. Signs: Signs are not allowed except in rare cases subject to individual review by PG&E.

11. Recreation Areas: Playgrounds, parks, tennis courts, basketball courts, barbecue and light trucks (pickups, vans, etc.) may be allowed; subject to review of plans. Heavy equipment access to PG&E facilities is to be maintained at all times. Parking is to clear PG&E structures by at least 10 feet. Protection of PG&E facilities from vehicular traffic is to be provided at developer's expense AND to PG&E specifications.

12. Construction Activity: Since construction activity will take place near PG&E's overhead electric lines, please be advised it is the contractor's responsibility to be aware of, and observe the minimum clearances for both workers and equipment operating near high voltage electric lines set out in the High-Voltage Electrical Safety Orders of the California Division of Industrial Safety (https://www.dir.ca.gov/Title8/sb5g2.html), as well as any other safety regulations.

Contractors shall comply with California Public Utilities Commission General Order 95 (http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/gos/G095/go 95 startup page.html) and all other safety rules. No construction may occur within 25 feet of PG&E's towers. All excavation activities may only commence after 811 protocols has been followed.

Contractor shall ensure the protection of PG&E's towers and poles from vehicular damage by (installing protective barriers) Plans for protection barriers must be approved by PG&E prior to construction .

13. PG&E is also the owner of distribution facilities throughout many of the areas within the state of California. Therefore, any plans that impact PG&E's facilities must be reviewed and approved by PG&E to ensure that no impact occurs that may endanger the safe and reliable operation of its facilities .

PG&E Gas and Electric Facilities Page 6
Int ern al
PG&E Preliminary Document
and Plan Review
Step-by-Step Guide
When planning a development project, it is important that any new buildings or landscaping are located a safe distance from ove rhead and underground utility lines. Pacific Gas and Electric Company {PG&E) has developed t he following 3-step guide to assist cities/counties, builders, and developers with ensuring preliminary plans are compatible with any PG&E electric or gas facilities in the area.

STEP 1
SUBMIT
STEP 2
REVIEW
STEP 3

RESPONSE
Please send all preliminary planning documents to
[email protected]. Planning documents include (but may not be limited to) : Engineer drawings, subdivision/tract maps, surveys.

This plan review process does not replace the application process for PG&E gas or electric service. For these requests, please submit requests on PG&E's Your Proiects.

PG&E will review the planning documents to confirm:

Plans accurately depict the location(s) of PG&E's facilities. Contact [email protected] to obtain maps delineating PG&E's existing gas facilities. Sign up for PG&E's Joint Use Map Portal (Jump) to obtain maps delineating PG&E's existing electric facilities .

Plans are compatible with any existing or proposed gas or electric facilities.

Compli ance with existing easements, if applicable.

Within 45-days* of submission, PG&E will issue a response letter.

If no impacts are identified, PG&E will provide a no impact letter, along with any requirements that must be followed when working near PG&E's facilities. If impacts are identified, PG&E will provide comments to the submitter to update and re-submit the plans.
*High volume of requests may extend the expected response to the submitted plans.

NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
To: County Clerk
County of Fresno
2220 Tulare Street, 1st Floor
Fresno, CA 93721

THE PROJECT DESCRIBED HEREIN IS DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT FROM THE PREPARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS PURSUANT TO ARTICLE 19 OF THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES.

LEAD AGENCY: City of Reedley
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93654
APPLICANT:

Phone: (559) 637-4200 x 222
E-mail: [email protected]
JJI Investments LLC
2319 Webster St.

Sanger CA 93657
559-903-8463
Jji. [email protected]
PROJECT TITLE: Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06 for Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
PROJECT LOCATION: 1533 East Myrtle Avenue, Reedley CA 93654 (APN 370-345-06) EXEMPT STATUS: Categorical Exemption
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 pertains to the subdivision of land from one 1.11-acre residentially zoned parcel (APN 370-345-06) into four parcels for low density residential development purposes, including the installation of public improvements. The project is consistent with the 2030 General Plan Low Density Residential Planned Land Use Designation and the proposed Reedley Municipal Code R-1-6 (Low Density Residential) Zone District.

This project is exempt under 15332 (Class 32/lnfill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

EXPLANATION: Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) of the CEQA Guidelines exempts projects that are consistent with the General Plan and zoning; occur within the city limits on a site less than five acres; contain no habitat for endangered species; would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality; and can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services.

The project site has a Low Density Residential Planned Land Use Designation, the purpose of which is to provide single-family detached residential development, attached single family, and low density multi-family uses. The project occurs in the city limits of Reedley and is on an affected area that is approximately 1.11 acres. Because the project site is in an urban area surrounded by existing residential development, there is no habitat for endangered species on the site. The project would be required to comply with general plan policies and mitigation measures addressed in the Reedley General Plan 2030 Program EIR (SCH# 2010031106), which would determine that the project City of Reedley
Categorical Exemption
Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06
Date:
would not result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality. The site can be adequately served by 8" water lines in East Myrtle Avenue and East Elm Avenue, 8" sewer mains in East Myrtle Avenue and East Elm Avenue, and an on-site storm drain line connected to an 18" storm drain facility in North Cedar Avenue.

The proposed project will involve the subdivision of land and installation of public improvements to accommodate for low density residential development on an approximately 1.11 -acre site, which is an exemption characterized under Section 15332 (Class 32/lnfill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.

July 16, 2026 Submitted by:

Ellen Moore, AICP, City Planner
City of Reedley
Community Development Department
(559) 637-4200 ext. 222
[email protected]

MID-VALLEY TIMES
1059 G STREET, REEDLEY, CA 93654
TELEPHONE (559) 638-2244

CITY OF REEDLEY
1717 9TH STREET
REEDLEY, CA 93654

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF

CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF FRESNO

PUBLIC HEARING
BAN 2026-05
Case Number --------------
DEC LARA T 1O N OF PUBLICATION
(2015.5 C.C.P)
Declaration of Publication

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
County of Fresno
Declarant says:

That at times herein mentioned is and was a citizen of
the United States, over the age of twenty-one years,
and not a party to nor interested in the within matter; that declarant is, now and was at all times herein mentioned, the Principal Clerk of the Printer of MID-VALLEY TIMES, a newspaper of general circulation (under Government Code Section 6024) by the Superior Court of the County of Fresno, State of California, under the date of June 19, 2019, by said Superior Court Case Number
19CEG01981; that the instrument of which the annexed
is a printed copy; has been published in each regular
and like issue of said newspaper (and not any supplement thereof on the following dates, to wit:

I declare under penalty of purjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
7/2/26
EXECUTED ON _ __ JU_ L_Y_0_2 __ , 2026 at
Reedley, California.
~~Ll Q004 Declarant

CITY OF REEDLEY

COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT

DEPARTMENT

NOTICE OF PUBLIC

HEARING
Environmental
Assessment No.
2026-05
Rezone Application
No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002)
Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06
Tentative Parcel
Map Application No.
2026-01

NOTICE IS HEREBY
GIVEN that in accordance with Sections
65090 and 65091 (Planning and Zoning Law) of
the Government Code;
and, pursuant to the
procedures ofTitle 1 O of
the Reedley Municipal
Code, the City Council
of the City of Reedley
will conduct a public
hearing and consider
the recommendation of
the Reedley Planning
Commission pertaining
to the following :

1. Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05
pertains to the consideration of a "common
sense" exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b) (3), prepared for Rezone Application No.
2026-01 (Ordinance
No. 2026-002).

2. Rezone Application
No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002)
pertains to the reclassification of one 1.11-acre
parcel (APN 370-345-
06) located at 1533 East
Myrtle Avenue from
MDR (Medium Density
Residential) with a PUD
Overlay to R-1 -6 (Low
Density Residential) to
achieve consistency
with the parcel's existing Low Density Residential General Plan Land Use Designation.

3. Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06
pertains to the consideration of an exemption from the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA), pursuant
to Section 15332 (Class
32/ln-fill Development
Projects) of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines, prepared
for Tentative Parcel
Map Application No.
2026-01 .

4. Tentative Parcel
Map Application No.
2026-01 pertains to the
subdivision of land from
one 1.11-acre residentially zoned parcel (APN
370-345-06) located at
1533 East Myrtle Avenue into four parcels for
low density residential
development purposes.

REEDLEY CITY

COUNCIL
Date: Tuesday, July 28,
2026
Time: 5:00 p.m., or
thereafter
Place: City Hall Council
Chamber
845 "G" Street, Reedley, CA 93654
The City Council Meeting Agenda will be
available for review on
the City of Reedley's
website at http://www.
reedley.ca.gov/ at least
72 hours in advance of
the meeting .

Any interested person
may appear at the public hearing and present written testimony, or speak in favor or
against the project proposal. If you challenge
the above applications
in court, you may be
limited to raising only
those issues , you, or
someone else, raised
at the public hearing
described in this notice,
or in written correspondence delivered to the
City Council of the City
of Reedley at, or prior
to, the public hearing.

NOTE: Government
Code Section 65091
(Planning and Zoning
Law) requires that this
notice be sent to owners of property within
300 feet of the subject
property. The City of
Reedley, Community
Development Department has mailed this
notice to the property
owners within 350 feet
of the project.

Additional information on the proposed
application, including
the environmental assessment, is available
for public review and
may be obtained from
the Community Development Department,
1733 9th Street, Reedley, California 93654.

Please contact the
Planning Department,
at (559) 637-4200, ext.
222, or by email at plann in g@ree d I ey. ca .gov
for more information.

Requests for accommodations for the disabled,
including auxiliary aids
or to request translation services, should be
made 48 hours prior to
the meeting by contacting the City Clerk at
(559) 637-4200 ext. 212
or via e-mail at ruthie.
g reenwood@reed ley.
ca.gov. Any document
that is a public record
and provided to a majority of the City Council
regarding an open session item on the agenda
will be made available
for public inspection at
1733 9th Street, Reedley CA 93654 , during
normal business hours.

In addition, such documents may be posted
on the City's website.

Unless otherwise required by law to be accepted by the City at or prior to a City Council
meeting or hearing , no
documents shall be accepted for Council review
unless they are first submitted to the City Clerk
via e-mail at ruthie.green[email protected] .gov
by the close of business
one day prior to said City
Council meeting/hearing at
which the City Council will
consider the item to which
the documents relate.

The meeting will be held
in person and may be
observed remotely via
Zoom or at: https://reedley.
ca .gov/city-council/citycouncil-live-stream/
Members of the public
who wish to provide written comments are encouraged to submit their comments to the City Clerk at ruthie .greenwood@reedley.ca.gov by the close of
business one day prior to
the start of the meeting to
ensure that the comments
will be available to the City
Council. Please indicate
the agenda item number
to which the comment pertains. Written comments
that do not specify a particular agenda item will
be marked for the general
public comment portion of
the meeting. A copy of any
written comment will be
provided to the City Council at the meeting. Please
note that written comments
received will not be read
aloud during the meeting,
but will be included with the
meeting minutes.

Assessor's Parcel Number: 370-345-06
Published Date: July 2,
2026
MVT 712/26
564-27
City of Reedley
Community Development Department
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, CA 93654
(559) 637-4200
https ://reed ley. ca . gov

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Proof of Service by Mail
(required as per Reedley Municipal Code
SUBJECT: Notice of Public Hearing (City Council): for Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05, Rezone Application 2026-01 , Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06, and Tentative Parcel Map 2026-01

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF FRESNO

CITY OF REEDLEY
I am an employee of the City of Reedley.

On July 2, 2026, I served the attached notice pursuant to Reedley Municipal Code on the persons named thereon or attached thereto by placing a true copy thereof with postage thereon fully prepaid in the United States mail.

I declare, under penalty or perjury, that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on July 2. 2026, at City of Reedley
Community Development Department
1733 Ninth Street
Reedley, California 93654.

Attachments: 1. Notice of Public Hearing

2. List of Addresses

3. Vicinity Map
Signature

CITY OF REEDLEY

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05
Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002) Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that in accordance with Sections 65090 and 65091 (Planning and Zoning Law) of the Government Code; and, pursuant to the procedures of Title 10 of the Reedley Municipal Code, the City Council of the City of Reedley will conduct a public hearing and consider the recommendation of the Reedley Planning Commission pertaining to the following :

1. Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05 pertains to the consideration of a "common sense" exemption under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3), prepared for Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002).

2. Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002) pertains to the reclassification of one 1.11-acre parcel (APN 370-345-06) located at 1533 East Myrtle Avenue from MOR (Medium Density Residential) with a PUD Overlay to R-1-6 (Low Density Residential) to achieve consistency with the parcel's existing Low Density Residential General Plan Land Use Designation.

3. Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06 pertains to the consideration of an exemption from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32/ln-fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, prepared for Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 .

4. Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 pertains to the subdivision of land from one 1.11-acre residentially zoned parcel (APN 370-345-06) located at 1533 East Myrtle Avenue into four parcels for low density residential development purposes.

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
Date: Tuesday, July 28, 2026
Time: 5:00 p.m., or thereafter
Place: City Hall Council Chamber
845 "G" Street, Reedley, CA 93654
The City Council Meeting Agenda will be available for review on the City of Reedley's website at http://www.reedley.ca.gov/ at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting.

Any interested person may appear at the public hearing and present written testimony, or speak in favor or against the project proposal. If you challenge the above applications in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues, you, or someone else, raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council of the City of Reedley at, or prior to, the public hearing.

NOTE: Government Code Section 65091 (Planning and Zoning Law) requires that this notice be sent to owners of property within 300 feet of the subject property. The City of Reedley, Community Development Department has mailed this notice to the property owners within 350 feet of the project.

Additional information on the proposed application , including the environmental assessment, is available for public review and may be obtained from the Community Development Department, 1733 9th Street, Reedley, California 93654. Please contact the Planning Department, at (559) 637- 4200, ext. 222, or by email at [email protected] for more information.

Requests for accommodations for the disabled, including auxiliary aids or to request translation services, should be made 48 hours prior to the meeting by contacting the City Clerk at (559) 637- 4200 ext. 212 or via e-mail at [email protected]. Any document that is a public record and provided to a majority of the City Council regarding an open session item on the agenda will be made available for public inspection at 1733 9th Street, Reedley CA 93654, during normal business hours. In addition, such documents may be posted on the City's website.

Unless otherwise required by law to be accepted by the City at or prior to a City Council meeting or hearing, no documents shall be accepted for Council review unless they are first submitted to the City Clerk via e-mail at [email protected] by the close of business one day prior to said City Council meeting/hearing at which the City Council will consider the item to which the documents relate.

The meeting will be held in person and may be obs~rved remotely via Zoom or at:
https://reedley.ca.gov/city-council/city-council-live-stream/ Members of the public who wish to provide written comments are encouraged to submit their comments to the City Clerk at [email protected] by the close of business one day prior to the start of the meeting to ensure that the comments will be available to the City Council.

Please indicate the agenda item number to which the comment pertains. Written comments that do not specify a particular agenda item will be marked for the general public comment portion of the meeting. A copy of any written comment will be provided to the City Council at the meeting . Please note that written comments received will not be read aloud during the meeting, but will be included with the meeting minutes.

Assessor's Parcel Number: 370-345-06
Published Date: July 2, 2026

PENA ARTHUR G & MARIA E

FAMILY TRUST
13010 AVE422
OROSI CA 93647

ORLANDO C & CLOTILDA J
MORA
1458 E MYRTLE
REEDLEY CA 93654

ARNULFO & ANGELICA

AGUILAR
770NKADY
REEDLEY CA 93654

ISAAC VENTURES LP
933 G ST
REEDLEY CA 93654

URSULO BRA VO HERNANDEZ
1532 E MYRTLE
REEDLEY CA 93654

VANESSA HERRERA
38111 SQUAW VALLEY RD
SQUAW VALLEY CA 93675

RUTH PIMENTEL
593 N KADY
REEDLEY CA 93654

ADELAIDO & ACELA VASQUEZ
234 S SUNSET
REEDLEY CA 93654

SALVADOR TENORIO
16561 E MANNING
REEDLEY CA 93654

CAROLINA RIVERA
628 N SUNRISE
REEDLEY CA 93654

ORLANDO C & CLOTILDA MORA
1478 E MYRTLE
REEDLEY CA 93654

CINTHIA VALENCIA MAGANA
750 KADY
REEDLEY CA 93654

ISAAC VENTURES LP
933 G ST
REEDLEY CA 93654

DANIEL & MARIA FERMAN
1582 E MYRTLE
REEDLEY CA 93654

ANDRES CANTOR RAMIREZ
1426 E MYRTLE
REEDLEY CA 93654

RONALD A & KIM T NGUYEN
LEA
PO BOX 1230
SELMA CA 93662

JUAN M & ROSA E RAMOS
577 NKADY
REEDLEY CA 93654

MAGANA J ANDREW
2933 W 560 SOUTH
LEHI UT 84043

RAUL & FRANCISCA SERNA
590 N SUNRISE
REEDLEY CA 93654

ENRIQUE SALDANA & AVELINA

BANALES
646 N SUNRISE
REEDLEY CA 93654
I RZ 2026-01 TPM 2026-01 I

ORLANDO C & CLOTILDA J
MORA
1478 E MYRTLE
REEDLEY CA 93654

JANET KAREN KASSOUF
4023 OAK MANOR CT
HAYWARD CA 94542

ISAAC VENTURES LP
933 G ST
REEDLEY CA 93654

JOSEPH SARSOUR
1564 E MYRTLE
REEDLEY CA 93654

MILLER BILL & TANYA FAM

LTD PARTNERSHIP
PO BOX 6398
VISALIA CA 93290

BILL & TANYA MILLER FAM

LTD PARTNERSHIP
PO BOX 6398
VISALIA CA 93290

RAUL & OLIVIA GUTIERREZ
555 NKADY
REEDLEY CA 93654

BERTHA S ALCALA
546 N SUNRISE
REEDLEY CA 93654

JUANA BARAJAS JAIME
610 N SUNRISE
REEDLEY CA 93654

ELVA CHAVEZ
662 N SUNRISE
REEDLEY CA 93654

RICARDO SANCHEZ &

GUADALUPE S DIAZ
661 N KADY
REEDLEY CA 93654

ARMANDO & ANA LILIA

MENDOZA
611 NKADY
REEDLEY CA 93654

JOSE & MARIA P GARCIA
1495 E ELM
REEDLEY CA 93654

CANDELARIO & MARIA

BECERRA
1544 E NORTH
REEDLEY CA 93654

JUAN & VERONICA LOY A
RIVERA
1476 E NORTH A VE
REEDLEY CA 93654

VICTOR HERNANDEZ
552 N CEDAR
REEDLEY CA 93654

AMADO VAZQUEZ & VAZQUEZ

ARACELY S PENA
596 N CEDAR
REEDLEY CA 93654

ADACMONROY
654 N CEDAR
REEDLEY CA 93654

MARIO L MARTINEZ
689 N VALENCIA
REEDLEY CA 93654

RIGOBERTO HERREJON CHAVEZ
653 NV ALENCIA
REEDLEY CA 93654

JOHN & ROSA RODRIGUEZ
645 NKADY
REEDLEY CA 93654

DANIEL & GLORIA VILLARREAL
1406 MERRILL A VE
DINUBA CA 93618

VICTOR PEREZ
1519 E ELM
REEDLEY CA 93654

FRANCISCO & EL VIA C AGUILAR
1516 E NORTH
REEDLEY CA 93654

FERNANDO & MARIA D

FERREYRA
PO BOX 1444
REEDLEY CA 93654

MARIO & JUANA L A COST A
536 N CEDAR
REEDLEY CA 93654

CRISTIAN DE JESUS &

ALEJANDRA DIAZ
632 N CEDAR
REEDLEY CA 93654

CARMELO ANTONIO GOMEZ
676 N CEDAR
REEDLEY CA 93654

RUIZ J ASCENCION CHAVEZ
677 N VALEN CIA
REEDLEY CA 93654

JESUS ANTONIO TORRES

MARQUEZ
641 N VALEN CIA
REEDLEY CA 93654
IRZ 2026-01 TPM 2026-01 I

DA YID JAUREGUI & HILDA V

PRECIADO
627NKADY
REEDLEY CA 93654

FRANCISCO R & IRMA A MA TA
1473 E ELM
REEDLEY CA 93654

GILBERTO & MARIA LUISA

VILLASANA
567 N CEDAR
REEDLEY CA 93654

JOSE LUIS & NORMA P ALEMAN
1492 E NORTH A VE
REEDLEY CA 93654

CARMEN BARBOSA
578 N CEDAR
REEDLEY CA 93654

ESTEBAN & MARIA RODRIGUEZ
518 N CEDAR
REEDLEY CA 93654

JOANNA DOLORES LEMUS
648 N CEDAR
REEDLEY CA 93654

TRITON REAL ESTA TE LLC
21283 E PARLIER
REEDLEY CA 93654

GENEL A FERREYRA CEDENO
665 N VALENCIA
REEDLEY CA 93654

MARTIN & ANGELICAS AGUA YO
629 N VALENCIA
REEDLEY CA 93654

YESENIA ARREZ
692 N VALENCIA
REEDLEY CA 93654

JORGE VILLARREAL MACIAS
656 N VALENCIA
REEDLEY CA 93654

JOSE RICARDO LOPEZ
589 N BUTTONWILLOW
REEDLEY CA 93654

GLORIA HURTADO
1470 E ELM
REEDLEY CA 93654

JUAN & GRACIELA V

ALDENEGROSALAZAR
664NKADY
REEDLEY CA 93654

RIGOBERTO LOPEZ MEDINA
680 N VALENCIA
REEDLEY CA 93654

JOSE CEDENO & MARIA CORTEZ
RUIZ
644 N VALEN CIA
REEDLEY CA 93654

VICTORIA CRUTCHFIELD
523 N BUTTONWILLOW
REEDLEY CA 93654

IGNACIO & MARISOL PEREZ
630 NKADY
REEDLEY CA 93654

MARIA G LOPEZ PRECIADO
1477 E MYRTLE
REEDLEY CA 93654
IRZ 2026-01 TPM 2026-01 I

EDUARDO PICHARDO
668 N VALENCIA
REEDLEY CA 93654

GUST A VO ROSAS & SIL VIA

RODRIGUEZ LEON
618 N VALENCIA
REEDLEY CA 93654

JOSE VICTOR ECHEVESTE
3041 E VARTIKIAN
FRESNO CA 93710

JOSE A & SIL VIA GONZALEZ
648NKADY
REEDLEY CA 93654

ISMAEL VALDEZ
1533 E MYRTLE
REEDLEY CA 93654
7/2/26, 10:00 AM
('t PARCEL QUEST
I t::::j t:::J D :L I ~ ... .. .. ---------.-... ,
et it ess Q, .. .,_,,,
E Myrtle Ave
~
~ I I I I I © 20 15 ParcelQuest www.parcelquest.com (888) 217-8999 https://pqweb.parcelquestcom/#home
Search I ParcelQuest
II @t I @ J l r,
L .I
1vtanmrig A.ve _
·u
- -- - I
I
I
l
I
'
" I I
I
I
I
Map pata @_2026 Google 50 m
1/5
7/2/26, 10:00 AM Search I ParcelQuest
~ PARCEL OU EST
LIST 0
DETAIL
r.i ' APN"'- Lot Acres Lot SqFt Owner S Street Address Year Built Census Tract r.i 1 370-345-06 1110 48,351 VALDEZ ISMAEL 1533 E MYRTLE AVE 1940 66 06/3 ~ PARCELOUEST
LIST 0
DETAIL
' Lot Lot Year Census
r.i APN A Acres Sq Ft Owner S Street Address Built Tract r.i 1 370-100- 0.550 23,975 PENA ARTHUR G & MARIA E FAMILY TRUST 1567 E MANNING AVE 66.06/ 3 09 r.i J. 370-100- 0.431 18,810 MORA ORLANDO C & CLOTILDA 1478 E MYRTLE AVE 1910 6606/ 3 18 r.i 1 370-100- 0.288 12,573 MORA ORLANDO C & CLOTILDA J 66.06/ 3 19 r.i 2 370-100- 0.146 6,400 MORA ORLANDO C & CLOTILDA J 1458 E MYRTLE AVE 1918 66 06/ 3 20 r.i § 370-100- 0.215 9,398 MAGANA CINTHIA VALENCIA 750 N KADY AVE 1920 66 06/ 3 23 r.i z 370-100- 0.072 3,175 KASSOUF JANET KAREN TRUSTEE SIR CAROL KASSOUF 66.06/ 3 24 r.i ~ 370-100- 0.215 9,398 AGUILAR ARNULFO & ANGELICA 770 N KADY AVE 1951 66 06/ 3 25 r.i 2 370-100- 0.440 19,166 ISAAC VENTURES LP 1626 E MYRTLE AVE APT 21- 1988 66.06/ 3 54 28
r.i lQ 370-100- 0.446 19,437 ISAAC VENTURES LP 1612 E MYRTLE AVE APT 29- 1988 66 06/ 3 55 32
r.i 11 370-100- 0.480 20,908 ISAAC VENTURES LP 1650 E MYRTLE AVE APT 11- 1988 66.06/ 3 56 14
r.i J1. 370-100- 0.890 38,768 FERMAN DANIEL & MARIA 1582 E MYRTLE AVE 1940 66 06/ 3 58 r.i li 370-100- 0.179 7,800 SARSOUR JOSEPH 1564 E MYRTLE AVE 1925 66 06/ 3 59 r.i H 370-100- 1070 46,609 HERNANDEZ URSULO BRAVO 1532 E MYRTLE AVE 1925 66.06/ 3 60 r.i 12 370-100- 0.176 7,680 RAMIREZ ANDRES CANTOR HERRERA VANESSA 1426 E MYRTLE AVE 1922 66.06/ 3 61 r.i 1§ 370-100- 1.930 84,070 MILLER BILL & TANYA FAM LTD PARTNERSHIP 776 N HANEY AVE 1992 66.06/ 2 62 r.i 1Z 370-100- 0.179 7,808 HERRERA VANESSA HERRERA ROSEMARY 1438 E MYRTLE AVE 1940 66.06/ 3 63 r.i ~ 370-100- 0.003 141 LEA RONALD A & KIM T NGUYEN-LEA 66 06/ 3 64 r.i 12 370-100- 0.699 30,456 BILL & TANYA MILLER FAM LTD PARTNERSHIP 1475 E MANNING AVE 1981 66.06/ 3 75 https ://pqweb. parcelq uest. com/#home 2/5
7/2/26, 10:00 AM Search I ParcelQuest
' Lot Lot Year Census
APNA Acres Sq Ft Owner S Street Address Built Tract
rJ £Q 370-341 - 0.151 6,600 PIMENTEL RUTH BARRAGAN RUTH 593 N KADY 1999 66 06/ 3 01 rJ 21 370-341- 0.148 6,480 RAMOS JUAN M & ROSA E TRUSTEES 577 N KADY 1999 6606/ 3 02 rJ ll 370-341- 0.148 6,480 GUTIERREZ RAUL & OLIVIA 555 N KADY 1999 66 06/ 3 03 rJ n 370-341- 0.148 6,480 VASQU EZ ADELAIDO & ACELA 539 N KADY 1999 6606/ 3 04 rJ ~ 370-341 - 0.148 6,480 MAGANA J ANDREW 517 N KADY 1999 6606/ 3 05 rJ £2. 370-341- 0.139 6,068 ALCALA BERTHA S 546 N SUNRISE AVE 2004 66 06/ 3 07 rJ .?.§ 370-341- 0.141 6,142 TENORIO SALVADOR 568 N SUNRISE AVE 2004 66 06/ 3 08 rJ ll 370-341- 0.141 6,142 SERNA RAUL & FRANCISCA 590 N SUNRISE AVE 2004 6606/ 3 09 rJ z.a 370-341- 0.119 5,200 JAIME JUANA BARAJAS 610 N SUNRISE AVE 2004 66.06/ 3 10 rJ .?.2 370-341- 0.129 5,650 RIVERA CAROLINA 628 N SUNRISE AVE 2003 66 06/ 3 11 rJ lQ 370-341- 0.129 5,650 BANALES ENRIQUE SALDANA & AVELINA 646 N SUNRISE AVE 2003 6606/ 3 12 rJ .11. 370-341- 0.129 5,650 CHAVEZ ELVA 662 N SUNRISE AVE 2003 66.06/ 3 13 rJ TI 370-341- 0.129 5,650 DIAZ RICARDO SANCHEZ & GUADALUPE S 661 N KADY 2003 66.06/ 3 15 rJ J1 370-341- 0.129 5,650 RODRIGUEZ JOHN & ROSA 645 N KADY 2003 66 06/ 3 16 rJ ~ 370-341- 0.120 5,253 PRECIADO DAVID JAUREGUI & HILDA V 627 N KADY 2003 6606/ 3 17 rJ 2.2 370-341 - 0.120 5,250 MENDOZA ARMANDO & ANA LILIA 611 N KADY 2003 66 06/ 3 18 rJ TI 370-342- 0.176 7,670 VILLARREAL DANIEL & GLORIA 570 N KADY AVE 1999 66 06/ 3 01 rJ la 370-342- 0.135 5,900 MATA FRANCISCO R & IRMA A 1473 E ELM AVE 1999 66.06/ 3 02 rJ 12 370-342- 0.162 7,080 GARCIA JOSE & MARIA P 1495 E ELM AVE 1999 66 06/ 3 03 rJ 1Q 370-342- 0.135 5,900 PEREZ VICTOR PEREZ IGNACIO 1519EELMAVE 1999 66 06/ 3 04 rJ 11 370-342- 0.176 7,670 VILLASANA GILBERTO JR & M ARIA LUISA 1547 E ELM AVE 1999 6606/ 3 05 rJ ~ 370-342- 0.176 7,670 BECERRA CANDELARIO & MARIA 1544 E NORTH AVE 1995 66 06/ 3 06 https://pqweb.parcelquest.com/#home 3/5
7/2/26, 10:00 AM Search I ParcelQuest
' Lot Lot Year Census
APNA Acres SqFt Owner S Street Address Built Tract
rJ il 370-342- 0.135 5,900 AGU ILAR FRANCISCO & ELVIA C 1516 E NORTH AVE 1995 6606/ 3 07 rJ ~ 370-342- 0.162 7,080 ALEMAN JOSE LUIS & NORMA P 1492 E NORTH AVE 1995 66 06/ 3 08 rJ 12. 370-342- 0.135 5,900 RIVERA JUAN & VERON ICA LOYA 1476 E NORTH AVE 1995 66 06/ 3 09 rJ 1§ 370-342- 0.176 7,670 FERREYRA FERNANDO & MARIA D 1452 E NORTH AVE 1995 66 06/ 3 10 rJ 1Z 370-343- 0.136 5,940 BARBOSA CARMEN TRS 578 N CEDAR AVE 1995 66 06/ 3 02 rJ :'.ill 370-343- 0.148 6,480 HERNANDEZ VICTOR HERNANDEZ MARIA G 552 N CEDAR AVE 1995 66 06/ 3 03 rJ 12 370-343- 0.136 5,940 ACOSTA MARIO & JUANA L 536 N CEDAR AVE 1995 6606/ 3 04 rJ 2Q 370-343- 0.161 7,020 RODRIGUEZ ESTEBAN & MARIA 518 N CEDAR AVE 1995 66 06/ 3 05 rJ 2.1 370-343- 0.148 6,480 PENA AMADO VAZQUEZ & VAZQUEZ ARACELY S 596 N CEDAR AVE 1995 66.06/ 3 06 rJ 2 370-343- 0.127 5,562 DIAZ CRISTIAN DE JESUS & ALEJANDRA CANTARENO 632 N CEDAR 2021 07 MARIA D CRUZ
rJ 21. 370-343- 0.132 5,768 LEMUS JOANNA DOLORES 648 N CEDAR 2021 08 rJ 2-4 370-343- 0.132 5,768 MONROY ADA C CISNEROS ALEJANDRO BON ILLA 654 N CEDAR AVE 2021 66 06/ 3 09 rJ 22 370-343- 0.132 5,768 GOMEZ CARMELO ANTONIO ANTONIO INOCENCIA 676 N CEDAR 2021 10 rJ 2Q 370-343- 0.141 6,180 TRITON REAL ESTATE LLC 1589 E MYRTLE AVE 1927 66 06/ 3 11 rJ iZ 370-343- 0.133 5,800 MARTINEZ MARIO L VENTURA MELIDA L FERMAN 689 N VALENCIA AVE 2021 6606/ 3 12 rJ ~ 370-343- 0.126 5,500 RU IZ J ASCENCION CHAVEZ GAONA GUADALUPE 677 N VALENCIA AVE 2021 66 06/ 3 13 SANTOYO
rJ 22 370-343- 0.126 5,500 CEDENO GEN EL A FERREYRA FERREYRA MARIA D 665 N VALENCIA AVE 2021 66 06/ 3 14 HERREJON DE
rJ §_Q 370-343- 0.126 5,500 CHAVEZ RIGOBERTO HERREJON LOPEZ LORENA YASM IN 653 N VALENCIA AVE 2021 66 06/ 3 15 FERREYRA
rJ fil. 370-343- 0.126 5,500 MARQUEZ JESUS ANTON IO TORRES 641 N VALENCIA AVE 2021 66 06/ 3 16 rJ ~ 370-343- 0.128 5,616 AGUAYO MARTIN JR & ANGELICAS 629 N VALENCIA AVE 2021 66 06/ 3 17 rJ §l 370-343- 0.151 6,600 ARREZ YESENIA MIRELEZ FRANCISCO Ill 692 N VALENCIA AVE 2021 66 06/ 3 18 rJ §.1 370-343- 0.126 5,500 MEDINA RIGOBERTO LOPEZ MACIAS IZAMAR SALDANA 680 N VALENCIA AVE 2021 66 06/ 3 19 https :/ /pqweb. parcelq uest. com/#ho me 4/5
7/2/26, 10:00AM Search I ParcelQuest
' Lot Lot Year Census
APNA Acres Sq Ft Owner S Street Address Bui lt Tract
~ 22. 370-343- 0.126 S,500 PICHARDO EDUARDO 668 N VALE NCIA AVE 202 1 6606/ 3 20 ~ §§ 370-343 - 0.126 5,500 MACIAS JORGE VILLARREAL M ENDEZ EDITH GONZALEZ 656 N VALENCIA AVE 2021 66 06/ 3 21 ~ §1 370-343 - 0.126 5,500 RU IZ JOSE CEDENO & MARIA CORTEZ 644 N VALE NCIA AVE 202 1 66 06/ 3 22 ~ fili 370-343- 0.128 5,610 LEON GUSTAVO ROSAS & SILVIA RODRIGUEZ 618 N VALENCIA AVE 2021 66 06/ 3 23 ~ §2 370-343- 0.837 36,480 LOPEZ JOSE RICARDO LOPEZ ANGELA 589 N BUTTONWILLOW AVE 1924 66 06/ 3 24 ~ lil 370-343- 0.651 28,386 CRUTCHFIELD VICTORIA 523 N BUTTONWILLOW AVE 1915 66 06/ 3 25 ~ l1 370-343- 0.544 23,738 ECHEVESTE JOSE VICTOR ALCALA JU LIA 1624 E NORTH AVE 66 06/ 2 26 ~ 11. 370-345- 0.186 8,118 HURTADO GLORIA 1470 E ELM AVE 2003 66 06/ 3 01 ~ TI 370-345 - 0. 147 6,435 PEREZ IGNACIO & MARISOL 630 N KADY 2003 6606/ 3 02 ~ 11 370-345- 0.145 6,318 GONZALEZ JOSE A & SILVIA 648 N KADY 2003 66 06/ 3 03 ~ 72 370-345- 0.147 6,435 SALAZAR JUAN & GRACIELA VALD ENEGRO 664 N KADY 2003 6606/ 3 04 ~ ~ 370-345- 0.182 7,956 PRECIADO MARIA G LOPEZ 1477 E MYRTLE AVE 2003 66 06/ 3 05 ~ ll 370-345- 11 10 48,35 1 VALDEZ ISMAEL 1533 E MYRTLE AVE 1940 66.06/ 3 06 https://pqweb.parcelquest.com/#home 5/5
RESOLUTION NO. 2026-09

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY

RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY APPROVE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2026-05 AND APPROVE REZONE APPLICATION NO. 2026-01 THROUGH THE ADOPTION OF ORDINANCE NO. 2026-002 WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002) pertains to the rezoning and reclassification of one 1.11-acre parcel (APN 370-345-06), located at 1533 East Myrtle Avenue, from the MOR (Medium Density Residential) Zone District with a PUD Overlay to the R-1-6 (Low Density Residential) Zone District to achieve consistency with the parcel's existing Low Density Residential General Plan Land Use Designation; and WHEREAS, the appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its consistency with the goals and policies of the Reedley General Plan and regulatory standards set forth in the Reedley Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the rezoning for the parcel identified in Rezone Application No. 2026-01 is consistent with the GPU Planned Land Use and Zoning District Consistency Matrix; and WHEREAS, specific Land Use Element goals and policies, which when applied, would further support the zone district reclassification; and WHEREAS, Rezone Application No. 2026-01 is consistent with the Reedley Municipal Code, Title 10, Zoning Regulations; and
WHEREAS, the project was evaluated and processed in accordance with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, Environmental Assessment No. 2026-05 determined that this project is categorically exempt under the "common sense" exemption under Section 15061 (b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 65090 and 65091 (Planning and Zoning Law) of the Government Code and the procedures of Title 10 of the Reedley Municipal Code, a Notice of Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation on June 18, 2026, and was mailed to surrounding property owners on June 25, 2026; and WHEREAS, the City of Reedley Planning Commission, at the regular meeting on July 16, 2026, held a public hearing to review the rezone application and environmental assessment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received public testimony, oral and written staff report, and deliberated; and
PC Resolution No. 2026-09
Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No. 2026-002) Page 1 o/2 WHEREAS, the City of Reedley Planning Commission determined that the proposed project is consistent with the Reedley General Plan , and the Reedley Municipal Code .

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Reedley Planning Commission using their independent judgment hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Reedley approve Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06 and Rezone Application No. 2026- 01 through the adoption of Ordinance No. 2026-002 based on the following :

1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference; and

2. The Reedley Planning Commission recommends that the City Council of the City of Reedley finds that Rezone Application No. 2026-01 is consistent with the General Plan and the purposes and intended application of the Zoning Code change proposed; and

3. The Reedley Planning Commission recommends that the City Council of the City of Reedley finds that Rezone Application No. 2026-01 is consistent with the Reedley Municipal Code, Title 10, Zoning Regulations , Chapter 10.06 (Zoning Districts and Map) and Chapter 10.110 (Amendments); and

4. The Planning Commissions recommends that the City Council of the City of Reedley amend the Official Zoning Map of the City of Reedley consistent with Exhibit A; and

5. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption.

This foregoing resolution is hereby approved and adopted this 16th day of July, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES: Turner , Ledington, Bracamontes, Valencia, Luzania.

NOES: None.

ABSTAIN : None.

ABSENT: None.

City of Reedley Planning Commission
Exhibit A: Map of affected parcel(s) related to Rezone Application No. 2026-01 PC Resolution No. 2026-09
Rezone Application No. 2026-01 (Ordinance No . 2026-002) Page 2 of2 RESOLUTION NO. 2026-10

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF

REEDLEY RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP APPLICATION NO. 2026-01 AND RELATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 2026-06
WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 pertains to the division of land of one legal lot of record into four legal lots of record for future low density residential development; and
WHEREAS, the subject property is located at 1533 East Myrtle Avenue (APN 370-345- 06); and
WHEREAS, the property is approximately 1.11 acres in size and has a zoning designation of R-1-6 (Low Density Residential); and
WHEREAS, the appropriateness of the proposed project has been examined with respect to its consistency with the goals and policies of the Reedley General Plan and regulatory standards set forth in the Reedley Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01, subject to the recommended conditions of approval, complies with the design and property development standards of the Reedley General Plan, Reedley Municipal Code, and the Subdivision Map Act; and
WHEREAS, the project was evaluated and processed in accordance with provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); and
WHEREAS, Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06 determined that this project is categorically exempt under Section 15332 (Class 32/ln-fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 65090 and 65091 (Planning and Zoning Law) of the Government Code and the procedures of Title 10 of the Reedley Municipal Code, a Notice of Public Hearing was published in a newspaper of general circulation on June 18, 2026, and was mailed to surrounding property owners on June 25, 2026; and PC Resolution No. 2026-10
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 Page 1 of 3 WHEREAS, the City of Reedley Planning Commission, at the regular meeting on July 16, 2026, held a public hearing to review the tentative parcel map application and environmental assessment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received public testimony, oral and written staff report, and deliberated; and
WHEREAS, the City of Reedley Planning Commission determined that the proposed project is consistent with the Reedley General Plan, Reedley Municipal Code, and the Subdivision Map Act.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Reedley Planning Commission using their independent judgment hereby recommend that the City Council of the City of Reedley approve Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 and Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06 based on the following:

1. The above recitals are true and correct and incorporated herein by reference; and

2. The Planning Commission finds that Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 is consistent with the goals and polices of the Reedley General Plan; and

4. The Planning Commission finds that the design or improvements of the proposed parcel map are consistent with the Reedley General Plan; and

5. The Planning Commission finds that the site of the proposed subdivision of land is physically suitable for the type of development; and

6. The Planning Commission finds that the site of the proposed subdivision of land is physically suitable for the proposed density of development; and

7. The Planning Commission finds that the design of the proposed subdivision of land or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause significant and unavoidable impacts to fish, wildlife or their habitat; and

8. The Planning Commission finds that the proposed parcel map design is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and

9. The Planning Commission finds that the design of the proposed subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision; and

10. The Planning Commission finds that the tentative map meets or performs any of the requirements or conditions imposed by the subdivision map act or this title; and PC Resolution No. 2026-10
Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01 Page 2 of 3

11. The Planning Commission finds that pursuant to Government Code Section 664 73.1 , the design of the proposed subdivision will provide, to the extent feasible , for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision ; and

12. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council of the City of Reedley approve the attached conditions of approval for Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-01, dated July 16, 2026; and

13. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council of the City of Reedley approve Environmental Assessment No. 2026-06, dated July 16, 2026, a Categorical Exemption under Section 15332 (Class 32/ln-fill Development Projects) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines; and

14. This resolution is effective immediately upon adoption .

This foregoing resolution is hereby approved and adopted this 16th day of July, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTAIN :

ABSENT:

Ledington, Bracamontes, Turner, Valencia, Luzania.

None.

None.

None.

Rosemary Luzania , air
City of Reedley Planning Commission
Rodney L. Horton , Secretary
Attachment: Tentative Parcel Map Application No. 2026-0 '1 Conditions of Approval PC Resolulion No. 2026-1 0
Tentative Parcel 1vfap Application No. 2026-01 Page 3 q/3 DATE: July 28, 2026

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
D Consent
~ Regular Item
D Workshop
D Closed Session
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: /0
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-049 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF

REEDLEY DECLARING INTENTION TO REIMBURSE EXPENDITURES RELATING

TO CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FROM THE PROCEEDS OF TAX-EXEMPT

OBLIGATIONS AND HIRING FINANCING TEAM
SUBMITTED: Paul A. Melikian, Assistant City Manager
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council of the City of Reedley adopt Resolution No. 2026-049 declaring intention to reimburse expenditures relating to capital improvement projects from the proceeds of tax-exempt obligations, and hiring a financing team.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City is planning to finance a portion of the costs of the new Civic Center project through the issuance of tax-exempt bonds. This ensures the cost of a long-lived asset is spread out over the estimated useful life of the asset.

To comply with Internal Revenue Code (Code) requirements related to tax-exempt financing, the City must declare its intent to reimburse itself for eligible project expenditures incurred prior to the issuance of the bonds. A reimbursement resolution serves as this formal declaration of intent. Adoption of the resolution allows the City to use future bond proceeds to reimburse itself for certain prior expenditures, subject to applicable federal limitations. Generally, reimbursement must occur no later than 18 months after the later of (i) the date on which the expenditure is paid, or (ii) the date on which the project is placed in service, and in no event more than three years after the expenditure is incurred.

In addition, the City requires the support of financial services professionals to successfully issue the bonds. Staff recommends appointing Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. as bond underwriter and Jones Hall LLP as bond counsel and disclosure counsel , as both firms have excellent reputations in the municipal bond industry and the professionals at these firms have worked on similar financings for the City and other neighboring communities in the past.

Adoption of the resolution does not obligate the City to issue bonds, nor does it commit the City to reimburse specific expenditures. Rather, it allows the financing team to start preparing documents necessary for the bond issuance and preserves the City's ability to reimbursement itself from bond proceeds, should they become available in the future, for prior hard cost expenditures.

BACKGROUND
The City previously purchased a former bank building across the street from its existing City Hall using cash from its General Fund. The City anticipates using the proceeds of an issuance of tax-exempt bonds by the Reedley Public Financing Authority to finance the design and redevelopment of the purchased building into a new, modern Civic Center, with a total project cost of approximately $7 million. Staff held a workshop in connection with the project on June 23rd. The next step is hiring a financing team and adopting a "reimbursement resolution" preserving the City's ability to reimbursement itself from taxexempt bond proceeds, should they become available in the future, for prior hard cost expenditures.

The City expects that it will begin incurring costs related to the design and pre-construction portion of the project this fall, prior to the issuance of the tax-exempt bonds.

FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the reimbursement resolution will not result in any immediate financial impact. If bonds are issued in the future, eligible prior expenditures may be reimbursed from bond proceeds. Any such reimbursement will be limited to available bond proceeds and will not constitute a general obligation of the City.

Similarly, hiring the financing team will not result in any immediate financial impact. Both Oppenheimer and Jones Hall work on contingency, meaning they are only paid should the bond issuance successfully close and, even then, both firms will be paid from proceeds of the bonds, not other General Fund sources.

ATTACHMENTS
Resolution No. 2026-049

RESOLUTION NO. 2026-049

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REEDLEY DECLARING

INTENTION TO REIMBURSE EXPENDITURES RELATING TO CAPITAL

IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FROM THE PROCEEDS OF TAX-EXEMPT

OBLIGATIONS AND HIRING FINANCING TEAM
WHEREAS, the City of Reedley (the "City") anticipates using the proceeds of taxexempt bonds issued by the Reedley Public Financing Authority in the future to finance the design and construction of a new, modern Civic Center (the "Project") via the issuance of tax-exempt bonds (the "Bonds"); and
WHEREAS, United States Income Tax Regulations section 1.150-2 provides generally that proceeds of tax-exempt debt are not deemed to be expended when such proceeds are used for reimbursement of expenditures made prior to the date of issuance of such debt unless certain procedures are followed, one of which is a requirement that prior to the payment of any such expenditures, the issuer declares an intention to reimburse such expenditure; and
WHEREAS, it is in the public interest and for the public benefit that the City declares its official intent to reimburse the expenditures referenced herein.

NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Reedley hereby finds, determines, orders and resolves:

Section 1. Declaration of Intent. The City Council hereby declares that it reasonably expects to use a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse expenditures made by the City for the Project before the date of issuance of the Bonds, and not more than 60 days before the date of adoption of this Resolution. The City anticipates that the Bonds will be issued in an aggregate principal amount which is sufficient to raise funds for the Project in the approximate amount of $7,000,000.

Section 2. No Obligation to Issue Bonds. The adoption of this resolution is intended to comply with United States Income Tax Regulations section 1.150-2 by evidencing the intention of this City Council to reimburse itself from the proceeds of the Bonds, if and when issued, and shall not be deemed a final approval of all or any part of the Project or a final commitment on the part of the City to issue any or all of the Bonds.

Section 3. Professional Services. In connection with the issuance and sale of the Bonds, Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. is hereby appointed as bond underwriter, and Jones Hall LLP is hereby appointed as bond counsel and disclosure counsel. The City Manager and Assistant City Manager are hereby authorized to execute professional services agreements with each such firm to accomplish the issuance and sale of the Bonds. The costs and expenses of each such firm shall be paid from the proceeds of the Bonds, contingent on the successful issuance of the Bonds.

Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption.
-1-
The foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Reedley at a regular meeting held on the 28th day of July, 2026, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTAIN:

Matthew Tuttle, Mayor
ATTEST:

Ruthie Greenwood, City Clerk
-2-

REEDLEY CITY COUNCIL
DATE: July 28, 2026
D Consent
C8J Regular Item
D Workshop
D ClosedSession
D Public Hearing
ITEM NO: ----
TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2026-052 AWARDING A PROGRESSIVE DESIGNBUILD CONTRACT FOR THE REEDLEY CIVIC CENTER PROJECT TO HARRIS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. AND DARDEN ARCHITECTS, INC. FOR THE

REEDLEY CIVIC CENTER PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $574,250 AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
SUBMITTED: Paul A. Melikian, Assistant City Manager~
APPROVED: Nicole R. Zieba, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a Resolution No. 2026-052 approving and authorizing the City Manager to execute the Standard Agreement between the City and Harris Construction Co., Inc. and Darden Architects, Inc. for Progressive Design-Build Services for the Reedley Civic Center Project in an amount not to exceed $574,250, finding the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act, and to authorize the City Manager to make minor modifications as necessary to carry out the intent of the agreement.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The City of Reedley issued a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) on March 12, 2026, seeking qualified Progressive Design-Build Entities (PDBEs) to design and construct the Reedley Civic Center Project.

The key component of the project is a comprehensive renovation of the former Bank of America building at 936 G Street into a Civic Center. The new Civic Center will serve to replace Reedley's existing City Hall, which is at capacity, and free up space for the Police Department to expand its headquarters facility, also at capacity.

The City utilized a two-part qualifications-based selection process pursuant to California Government Code Section 1332.19 and Public Contract Code Section 10198, consistent with Progressive DesignBuild (PDB) procurement.

The City received a strong response of six Statements of Qualifications (SOQs) in response to the RFQ by the April 14, 2026 deadline. An evaluation panel consisting of five City staff members reviewed and scored the SOQs. The evaluation criteria included:
• Organizational structure and proposed Progressive Design-Build Team ; • Key personnel qualifications and experience;
• Demonstrated experience with Progressive Design-Build delivery; • Record of completing projects of similar size, scope, and complexity ; • Project management and communication approach;
• Safety record and compliance history;
• Capacity to meet project budget and schedule requirements; and • Demonstrated understanding of the City's project vision and critical success factors.

The evaluation panel objectively reviewed and scored the SOQs according to these criteria. The total scores were compiled, and the top three ranked design teams were invited to participate in confidential interviews on June 17, 2026, with the evaluation panel. During these interviews, the construction & design teams presented their project approach, design philosophy, collaboration strategies, and understanding of the City's goals for functionality, budget control, and architectural identity.

Based on scoring from the SOQs, confidential interviews, and project understanding recaps, Harris Construction Co., Inc. and Darden Architects, Inc. were recommended by the evaluation panel as the most qualified Progressive Design-Build Entity. Their proposal demonstrated a comprehensive understanding of the project's challenges, a collaborative design process, and extensive experience in delivering civic and adaptive reuse projects under the Progressive Design-Build model.

The attached Standard Agreement will allow the City to proceed with hiring the Harris-Darden team to complete total design and pre-construction work for a not to exceed cost of $574,250, to include the following elements:
• Architectural/Structural/Interior Design
• Civil Design (Underground Locating, Topographical Survey) • Electrical & Low Voltage Design
• HVAC Design
• Plumbing Design
• Fire Sprinkler Design
• Landscape Design
During this phase, Vanir will work with City staff and the Harris-Darden team to negotiate a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) that staff anticipates bringing to the City Council in November/December 2026 for the 'Go/No-Go' decision. If approved to proceed, the City would approve a second and final contract with Harris Construction Co., Inc. for construction, and Vanir, for construction management services.

The current project timeline estimates that the City can begin moving into the new Civic Center by March 2028.

BACKGROUND
Progressive Design-Build Delivery Method
The Progressive Design-Build method integrates both design and construction services under one contract and entity, allowing the City to collaborate with the design-builder early in the process to refine scope, manage costs, and establish a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) prior to construction.

This method provides several advantages:
•
•
•
•
Collaboration and Flexibility: Early coordination between the City, architect, and builder during design reduces change orders and delays.

Cost Control: The project budget is established up front, with Harris Construction Co., Inc. and Darden Architects, Inc. responsible for developing a GMP that cannot be exceeded without City approval.

Schedule Efficiency: Design and construction phases can overlap, allowing the project to move forward more efficiently.

Accountability: A single point of responsibility ensures design integrity, cost containment, and schedule adherence.