Richmond City Council
February 15, 2022

Badawi & Associates
Audit of the
City of Richmond
1Page 639 of 846
Agenda
Engagement Team
Deliverables and Scope of the Audit
Areas of Primary Emphasis
Auditors Report and Financial Statements
Required Communications
New Accounting Standards
Conclusion & Discussion/Questions
2Page 640 of 846
Engagement T eam
3

Engagement T eam
Engagement
Partner
Ahmed Badawi,
CPA
Engagement
Partner
Ahmed Badawi,
CPA
4 Audit Senior
Wenwei Zhao,
CPA
Audit Senior
Wenwei Zhao,
CPA
Professional
Audit Staff
Professional
Audit Staff
Professional
Audit Staff
Professional
Audit Staff
Professional
Audit Staff
Professional
Audit Staff
Independent
Quality Control
Reviewer
Mitesh Desai,
CPA
Independent
Quality Control
Reviewer
Mitesh Desai,
CPA

Deliverables and Scope of the Audit
Report of Independent Auditors on City of Richmond Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR)
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters
Independent Auditor’s Report on Compliance with Requirements Applicable to Each Major Program and Internal Control over Compliance in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance (City and Housing Authority)
Report on Compliance with TDA
Report of Independent Auditors on the Joint Powers Financing Authority Basic Financial Statements
Report of Independent Auditors on the Housing Authority Basic Financial Statements Annual Report of Financial Transactions to the State Controller (City, Sewer District, JPFA and 3 non-CalPERS pension plans)
Agreed Upon Procedures
– Appropriations Limit
Communications With Those Charged With Governance
Letter used to summarize communication of various significant matters to those charged with governance.
5Page 643 of 846
Areas of Primary Audit Emphasis
The risk of management override of controls is addressed by the following procedures:

Assignment of audit staff based on consideration of audit risk.

Procedures to incorporate an element of unpredictability in the audit.

Consideration of the selection and application of significant accounting principles.

Examination of journal entries.

Review of accounting estimates for bias.

Evaluation of business rationale for unusual transactions.

Evaluation of the appropriateness of fraud
-related inquiries performed
Impact of the Shelter in place and remote work on the control environment Revenues & Receivables (Tax, Grants, Notes,
etc): Improper revenue recognitions
Governmental
Funds: Confirm/validate property taxes, sales taxes, franchise taxes & other significant revenues/receivables.

Proprietary
Funds: Substantive analytical procedures
Pension
and OPEB: Complex accounting treatment
Reviewed
management’s journal entries for implementing GASB 68 and GASB 75 Reconciled
amounts recorded to reports provided by CalPERS and their auditors 6Page 644 of 846
7Page 645 of 846
Auditors Report
Unmodified opinion except for RHA; Business
-Type
Activities; RHA RAD, LLC; RHA Properties; and RHA
Housing Corporation for which we disclaimed the opinion Audit performed in accordance with Generally Accepted
Auditing Standards, and Government Auditing Standards
Financial statements are fairly presented in all material respects
Significant accounting policies have been consistently
applied
Estimates are reasonable
Disclosures are properly reflected in the financial
statements
8Page 646 of 846
9Page 647 of 846
Government-Wide Financial Statements
10 Cash &
Investments Receivables Capital
Assets Other Assets
Deferred
Outflow of
Resources
2019 $170,968,330 $81,645,497 $489,051,276 $703,579 $62,541,674 2020 $176,433,577 $86,516,460 $487,201,965 $519,440 $97,099,816 2021 $217,722,975 $84,855,461 $487,930,997 $5,156,602 $88,738,534 $-
$100,000,000
$200,000,000
$300,000,000
$400,000,000
$500,000,000
Assets and Deferred Outflow of Resources

Government-Wide Financial Statements
Accounts
Payable and
Accrued
Expenses
Unearned
Revenues
Compensated
Absences Claims Liability Long-Term
Liabilities
Net Pension
Liability
Net OPEB
Liability
Deferred
Inflows of
Resources
2019 $16,161,809 $9,021,062 $13,288,238 $44,577,999 $475,149,404 $330,400,118 $193,782,442 $9,037,850 2020 $23,791,044 $8,521,940 $13,499,712 $43,240,367 $468,877,637 $340,483,031 $119,252,808 $63,554,454 2021 $30,606,689 $9,478,571 $13,317,044 $44,392,339 $441,820,728 $352,373,675 $103,801,398 $59,177,608 $-
$100,000,000
$200,000,000
$300,000,000
$400,000,000
$500,000,000
Liabilities and Deferred Inflows of Resources
11Page 649 of 846
Government-Wide Financial Statements
Net Investment in
Capital Assets Restricted Unrestricted
2019 $263,879,056 $102,598,887 $(652,986,509)
2020 $269,644,952 $95,221,061 $(598,315,748)
2021 $282,158,031 $117,261,612 $(569,983,126)
$(600,000,000)
$(500,000,000)
$(400,000,000)
$(300,000,000)
$(200,000,000)
$(100,000,000)
$-
$100,000,000
$200,000,000
$300,000,000
Net Position
12Page 650 of 846
Government-Wide Financial Statements
$(18,581,887)
$19,490,920
$65,193,656
$(30,000,000)
$(20,000,000)
$(10,000,000)
$-
$10,000,000
$20,000,000
$30,000,000
$40,000,000
$50,000,000
$60,000,000
$70,000,000
2019 2020 2021
Changes in Net Position
13Page 651 of 846
Government-Wide Financial Statements
2019 2020 2021
Net Cost of Service $191,223,098 $169,809,025 $144,815,928 Tax Revenue $168,396,325 $168,929,560 $186,596,334
$-
$20,000,000
$40,000,000
$60,000,000
$80,000,000
$100,000,000
$120,000,000
$140,000,000
$160,000,000
$180,000,000
$200,000,000
Net Cost of Service to Tax Revenue
14Page 652 of 846
GeneralFund
Expenditure Coverage
15 2019 2020 2021
Committed Fund Balance -$ 1,500,000$ 9,800,000$ Assigned Fund Balance 63,180 113,349 2,436,475 Unassigned Fund Balance 19,534,660 20,326,889 22,477,829 Total Unrestricted Fund Balance 19,597,840$ 21,940,238$ 34,714,304$ Total Expenditures 162,941,088$ 162,447,955$ 161,619,763$ Unrestricted Fund Balance as
a % of Total Expenditures 12.03% 13.51% 21.48%
Number of months 1 2 3
GFOA recommendation
Measure of City's ability to operate with no revenues using available fund balance.

No less than 2 monthsPage 653 of 846
Pension Plan
City’s Annual Pension Contributions
16 2019 2020 2021
Annual Pension
Contributions $30,699,619 $34,579,723 $37,010,104
$-
$5,000,000
$10,000,000
$15,000,000
$20,000,000
$25,000,000
$30,000,000
$35,000,000
$40,000,000

Pension Plan
17 CalPERS -
Miscellaneous
(7.15%)
CalPERS - Safety
(7.15%)
Police and
Firemen's
(3.50%)
General Pension
(1.00%)
Garfield Pension
(1.00%)
-1% $196,355,201 $305,868,453 $(3,942,720) $795,669 $86,811 % $134,637,439 $216,949,281 $(4,441,073) $715,046 $71,909 +1 $83,177,322 $143,617,664 $(4,891,344) $640,963 $58,184 $(50,000,000)
$-
$50,000,000
$100,000,000
$150,000,000
$200,000,000
$250,000,000
$300,000,000
$350,000,000
City’s Pension Plans Sensitivity to Discount Rate

Other Postemployment Benefits
City’s Annual OPEB Contributions
18 2019 2020 2021
Annual OPEB Contributions $6,797,458 $14,572,049 $10,544,567 $-
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000

OPEB Plans
19 City Plan (5.75%) RPOA Plan (5.50%)
-1% $105,088,635 $15,893,234
% $90,804,849 $12,996,549
+1 $78,834,871 $10,610,378
$-
$20,000,000
$40,000,000
$60,000,000
$80,000,000
$100,000,000
$120,000,000
City’s OPEB Plans Sensitivity to Discount Rate

OPEB Plans
20 City Plan RPOA Plan
-1% $79,021,375 $11,122,153
% $90,804,849 $12,996,549
+1 $104,891,041 $15,503,624
$-
$20,000,000
$40,000,000
$60,000,000
$80,000,000
$100,000,000
$120,000,000
City’s OPEB Plans Sensitivity to Healthcare Trend Rate

21Page 659 of 846
Required Communications
Our Responsibility Under
U.S GAAS
• Opinion on whether financial
statements are fairly stated in
accordance with U.S GAAP
• Evaluate internal control over
financial reporting including tone
at the top
• Evaluate compliance with laws,
contract and grants
• Ensure financial statements are
clear and transparent
• Communicate with the governing
body
22 Management Responsibility
• Management is responsible for the
financial statements
• Establish and maintain internal control
over financial reporting
• Making all financial records available to
us
• Establish internal control to prevent
and detect fraud
• Inform us of all known and suspected
fraud
• Comply with laws and regulations
• Take corrective action on audit findings

Required Communications
Independence
Timing of the Audit
• It is our responsibility to maintain
independence
• We will maintain our independence by strict
adherence to the AICPA and the Board of
Accountancy rule
• Other than compiling the financial
statements, no other services performed that
could affect our independence
• Within the time frame communicated to the
City in our engagement letters
23 • GASB Statement No. 84
• GASB Statement No. 90
• GASB Statement No. 93
• GASB Statement No. 98
Significant Accounting
Policies and Unusual
Transactions

Required Communications
Management Judgment and
Accounting Estimates
Significant management estimates
impacting the financial statements
include the following:
• Useful lives of Capital Assets
• Investment valuations
• Pension Liability
• OPEB Liability
• Claim Liability
24 Sensitive Disclosures
• Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
• Cash and Investments
• Capital Assets
• Pension Plan
• OPEB Plan
• COVID 19 Pandemic

Required Communications
Difficulties Encountered in
Performing the Audit None.
25 Significant Audit Adjustments and
Unadjusted Differences Considered
by Management to be Immaterial
Potential Effect on the Financial
Statements of Any Significant Risks
and Exposures
None.

No significant risks or exposures were
identified. Legal matters and potential
liabilities are disclosed in the financial
statements.

Disagreement with Management
None.

Required Communications
26 Deficiencies in Internal Control over
Financial Reporting
• City’s financial condition
• Large volume of unprocessed
invoices
• Delays in PAF submission and
approvals
• Segregation of duties in AP and
Payroll
• Grant Management

Required Communications
Representations Requested of
Management
Management Consultation with
Other Accountants
We obtained representations from management prior
to issuance of our reports.

We are not aware of any significant accounting or
auditing matters for which management consulted
with other accountants
27 Other Material Written
Communications
Material Uncertainties Related
to Events and Conditions
Fraud and Illegal Acts
Other than the engagement letters and
management representation letters, there have
been no other significant communications
There were no material uncertainties related to
events and conditions.

We have not become aware of any instances of
fraud or illegal acts, which was not disclosed by
the City

28 New Accounting Standards
2022
• GASB Statement No. 87 – Leases
• GASB Statement No. 89 – Construction-period interest
• GASB Statement No. 92– Omnibus (multiple effective date) • GASB Statement No. 93 – LIBOR removal and lease modifications • GASB Statement No. 97 - Certain Component Unit Criteria, and Accounting and Financial Reporting for Internal Revenue Code Section 457 Deferred Compensation Plans • GASB Statement No. 98 – The Annual Comprehensive Financial Report • Statement 91 – Conduit Debt Obligations
• Statement 94 – Public-private partnerships
• Statement 96 – Subscription-Based Information Technology Arrangements2023

Questions
Ahmed M. Badawi
[email protected]
29Page 667 of 846
Thank You
For Allowing Us to Provide Audit Services
to the City of Richmond
30Page 668 of 846

Community Development

DATE: February 1, 2022
TO: Mayor Butt and Members of the City Council
FROM:
(List all relevant/responsive staff
persons)
Lina Velasco, Director of Community Development
Hector Lopez, Senior Planner
Subject:
(This will appear on the agenda)
Appeal of Planning Commission’s approval of a
conditional use permit and design review (PLN20-043)
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There are no costs to the general fund associated with these actions.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:
(List all dates items were heard or
council action took place)
December 2, 2021 , January 11, 2022 , and January 18,
2022

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

On October 18, 2021, an appeal was filed by Claire
Arbour, Simon Winer, and Ron Elson, property owners of
360 Western Drive, objecting to the Planning
Commission’s conditional approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review (PLN20 -043) to construct a
two-story, single-family residence on a va cant parcel , within the RL1 zoning district and -S, Shoreline overlay district, at 357 Western Drive.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:
(This will appear on the agenda)
ADOPT a Resolution Denying the Appeal and Affirming
the Planning Commission’s conditional approval of a
Conditional Use Permit and Design Review, to construct a single-family residence on a vacant parcel located within the RL1 zoning district and -S, Shoreline overlay district at 357 Western Drive – Community Development
Department (Lina Velasco 510-620-6706). This item was
continued from the December 7 , 2021 , January 11 ,
2022, January 18, 2022 , and February 1, 2022,
AGENDA
REPORT

meetings. The public hearing is closed on this item;
for council discussion and resolution only.

DISCUSSION:

On October 18, 2021, an appeal (see Attachment 4) was filed by Claire Arbour, Simon Winer, and Ron Elson, property owners of 360 Western Drive, objecting to the Planning Commission’s conditional approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review (PLN20-043) to construct a two-story, single-family residence on a vacant parcel, within the RL1 Zoning district and -S, Shoreline overlay district, at 357 Western Drive.

Project Description:

The subject property (“project site”) is a 6,000 square foot parcel located on Western Drive, between Santa Fe Avenue and Casey Drive in the Point Richmond neighborhood.

The L-shaped parcel was created through a subdivision with the abutting parcel to the north approved by the City Council in 2009. The Planning Commission and City Council on appeal approved a parcel map, with conditions requiring the future residence on the subject lot be visually compatible with surrounding buildings. In addition, the parcel map was conditioned to provide two visual corridors to maintain views of the San Francisco Bay and restricting building heights and window placement (see Resolution No.128-09)

The proposed project is a 2, 340 square foot, two -story structure, consisting of three bedrooms, three bathrooms, and a 440 square foot, two-car garage to be constructed on a vacant 6,000 square foot parcel (see Project Plans in Attachment 2).

Zoning Analysis:

The proposed residential use requires a conditional use permit since the project site is located within the -S, Shoreline Overlay zone. In addition, a two -story structure requires major Design Review by the Design Review Board (DRB). When multiple applicat ions that require public hearings are filed for the same projects, all issues are to be heard together by the review authority with the most authority, and other review bodies shall provide recommendations to that review authority unless more specific proc edures for a specific application or procedure are prescribed. Therefore, the DRB’s review was in the form of a recommendation to the Planning Commission.

Design Review Board Recommendation: On November 18, 2020, the DRB held a public hearing to conside r a recommendation on the project design to the Planning Commission. The DRB and staff recommended that the applicant make additional changes and return to the DRB for a recommendation at a future meeting. During the DRB’s deliberation, the applicant state d that they did not want to make any additional changes to the design and instead requested that a vote be taken. Given that the Board wanted additional changes to be incorporated into the design to make the proposed design more compatible with surrounding structures, the DRB unanimously voted 7 -0 to recommend denial of the proposed design to the Planning Commission based on the applicant’s desire to not make additional design changes and provide additional exhibits.

Planning Commission Review: On February 4, April 1, September 16, and October 7, 2021, the Planning Commission held public hearings to consider the Conditional Use Permit and Design Review for the proposed project. During the hearing, several neighbors expressed their opposition to the proposed design. The neighbors expressed that modifying the butterfly roof to be a flat roof would reduce the height and massing of the structure.

The Planning Commission suggested the applicant work with staff and consult with members of the Design Review Board. It was recommended that the applicant return to a future meeting with additional exhibits, demonstrating the potential Bay views from the street. The applicant met with two Design Review Board members for input and subsequently revised the ir project plans and provided the additional exhibits requested by the Planning Commission.

At the September 16, 2021 meeting, the applicant stated that the project design had already been modified to reduce the height and address the comments originally expressed by the DRB, including removal of a roof deck proposed at the rear of the structure.

During its deliberations, the Planning Commission expressed that a compromise between the desires of the applicant and the neighbors was appropriate. The Planning Commission directed staff come back at a future meeting with d raft findings and conditions fo r approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Design Review with the following modifications:

1. The design of the roof be modified to decrease the slope of the butterfly roof and/or ceiling height to reduce the overall height.

2. The metal roofing material be coated to ensure it is non-reflective.

3. A green wall or landscaping be incorporated on the north elevation to reduce the massing and bulk of the building.

During the October 7, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, the applicant presented a n alternative design of the proposed butterfly roof. The Planning Commission found that the alternative design met the intent of a modified roof design that resulted in an overall height reduction. The Planning Commission ultimately determined there was sufficient grounds to make the required findings and approve the project.

APPEAL ACTION:

Pursuant to Section 15.04.803.140.E of the Zoning Ordinance, t he City Council determines whether an underlying decision is supported by substantial evidence and/or constitutes an abuse of discretion. The same standards and evaluation criteria, including the findings required, apply as they were for the original application. The appellate body's review is limited to the issue(s) raised in the petition for the appeal.

The City Council may affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. When a decision is modified or reversed, the City Council must state the specific reasons for modification or reversal. The City Council may also choose to refer a matter back to the Planning Commission or Design Review Board for further consideration and a decision if significant new evidence is presented in conjunction with the appeal, which may include substantial changes to the original proposal.

BASIS OF APPEAL:

The appeal letter (see Attachment 4) submitted by Claire Arbour, Simon Winer, and Ron Elson (“Appellants”) asserts the Planning Commission decision was in error because the process lacked information presented to the Design Review Board and Planning Commission to make an informed decision.

Staff’s Response to Issues Raised in the Appeal:

Pursuant to Section 15.04.803.050 of the Zoning Ordinance, when multiple applications that require a public hearing are filed for the same project, all issues shall be heard together by the review authori ty with the most authority, and other review bodies shall provide recommendations to that review authority. If a project requires design review, and a conditional use permit, the Design Review Board shall make a recommendation to the Planning Commission. I n this case, the DRB unanimously voted 7 -0 to recommend denial of the proposed design to the Planning Commission based on the applicant’s desire to not make additional design changes requested by the DRB to enable the DRB to make certain required Design Review findings. Following the DRB meeting, the applicant agreed to make additional design changes requested by the Planning Commission to address concerns and comments raised to support making the required design review findings to approve the project.

With respect to the Planning Commission direction to the applicant to work with staff and consult with members of the Design Review Board, it is not a violation of due process.

The DRB members asked to work with the applicant were primarily focused on making sure the applicant provided accurate and complete exhibits for Planning Commission review.

The applicant made some modifications to the project and provided additional exhibits demonstrating the impact of proposed project on Bay views from Western Drive. Based on the new information provided at or prior to the meeting held on October 7, 2021, the Planning Commission conditionally approved the project. With respect to the question of whether it was a late submission, the Planning Commission considered that it was a minor change meeting the intent for a modified roof with a lower slope. All exhibits provided during the meeting were adequate to determine the impact of Bay views from the street as required by the Shoreline Overlay District. Given the to pography of the site and the surrounding, the street intersection of Casey Drive and Western Drive will be partially affected. This is the main view down the street to the north. Portion of this view from this angle will be preserved due to the neighboring buildings being located at a much lower elevation. In front of the property, the new building will block the left side view, but the view of the Bay will be retained on the right side since the abutting buildings are located at a lower elevation.

It appears that existing Bay views from the home located across the street at 360 Western Drive will be partially blocked and the nearby homes across the street may not be affected since they are at higher elevations.

With respect to the issue that the property is not adequately served by public facilities and services, such as water, sewer, and other public facilities, it is uncertain at this time. There is a moratorium for parcels located within the tributary of the Keller Beach line; this issue is discussed later in this report.

In staff’s opinion, there were no abuse of discretion by the Planning Commission since the Design Review Board decision was only a recommendation and ultimately many of the design comments requested by the DRB were eventually integrated into the final project design.

City Council Public Hearing on Appeal

On December 7, 2021, the City Council held a public hearing regarding the appeal.

Several comments were raised regarding sewer service to the proposed project given concerns were raised about the ability of the project to connect to the Keller Beach Sewer System (KBSS) due to the degraded condition of the line. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Council directed staff to return to the meeting on January 11, 2022 on ce issues related to the potential moratorium on connections to the KBSS were considered.

The item was continued to January 18, and again to February 1 awaiting consideration of an urgency moratorium related to the KBSS.

On January 18, 2022, the City Council adopted an urgency ordinance imposing a 45-day moratorium on the issuance of building permits for projects that would require new sewer connections to the KBSS. The moratorium is also anticipated to be extended beyond the original 45-day period, possibly up to 2 years, should the Public Works Department and City Council find that the imminent threat to the health and safety has not been abated.

The moratorium adopted by the City Council does allow projects to be approved that require new connection s; however, building permits cannot be issued until options for connecting to the City sewer system are identified that do no further impact the KBSS.

The capacity to serve the property exists at the City’s water treatment plant, and therefore, the requir ed use permit finding regarding there being adequate utilities and public services to serve the site of the proposed use can be made. However, building permits requiring sewer connections to KBSS cannot be issued until the moratorium is lifted or an alternative design for the extension of a sewer main to an alternative segment is approved pursuant to Section 5(b) of the moratorium. Further, under Section 6 of the moratorium, any City entitlement approvals that are impacted by the moratorium will be tolled for the period that the moratorium is in place.

CONCLUSION:

Staff recommends the Council deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission’s conditional approval of the project. The project complies with the RL-1, Single-family Very Low Density Residential District regulations and is consistent with the Hillside Residential land use designation under the General Plan. The revised design represents a significant improvement and rel ates well to the surrounding buildings in the neighborhood. The revised design approved by the Planning Commission addressed many of the concerns raised by the public comments, including reducing the overall building height and slope of the butterfly roof.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1: Resolution Denying the Appeal and Upholding the Planning Commission’s conditional approval
Attachment 2: PC Resolution No.21-17 and Project Plan
Attachment 3: PC Resolution No.128-09
Attachment 4: Appeal letter from neighbor at 360 Western Drive Attachment 5: Supplemental Letter Submitted by Appellant on January 10, 2022

1 RESOLUTION NO. 21-X

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMON D DENYING THE APPEAL AND UPHOLDING T HE PLANNING COMMISSIO N’S CONDITIONAL APPROVAL

OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DESIGN REVIEW TO CONSTRUC T A SINGLE-

FAMILY RESIDENCE ON A VAC ANT PARCEL WITHIN THE -S, SHORELINE OVERLAY ZONE, AT 357 WESTERN DRIVE (PLN20-043).

WHEREAS, Rudi Garbelmann ( the “applicant”) requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review for th e construct ion of a single-family residence (“Project”) at 357 Western Drive (APN: 558-185-006) (“subject site”) within the -S, Shoreline Overlay Zone; and WHEREAS, on October 7, 2021, at a publ ic hearing the Planning Commission reviewed the Project and voted to approve the Conditional Use Permit and D esign Review, subject to conditions to be incorporated in the attached plans (Exhibit A) ; and

WHEREAS, on October 18, 2021, an appeal was filed by Claire Arbour, Simon Winer, and Ron Elson , property owner s surrounding the project site, objecting to the Planning Commission approval of the Conditional Use Permit and Design Review (PLN20-043).

WHEREAS , on December 7 , 2021 , the City C ouncil conducted a prop erly noticed public hearing pursuant to California Government Code S ection 65090 and has duly considered all written and verbal testimony presented before or during th e hearing, including the staff report ; and

WHEREAS, the proposed projects is categorically exempt under Section 153 03(a) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA ): In urbanized areas, up to three single -family residences may be constructed under this exemption.

WHEREAS, on the basis of the application , plans, materials and te stimony received at or befor e the p ublic hearing, the City Council makes the following findings, with supportin g statements of fact, regarding the a pplication consistency, as required by Section 15.04.805.050 of the Richmond Zoning Ordinance, for approval of the Major Design Review:

A. The General Plan and any applicable specific plans;
Statement of Fact: Criteria Satisfied. The General Plan land use designation of the Project site is Hillside Residential, and the zoning designation is RL1 with an –S, Shoreline Overlay District (which i s the area within the 100-foot shoreli ne band) . The proposed project complies with General Plan Policy LU4.I, which encourages protecting, conserving, and enhancing the Richmond shoreline, including being harmonious with the site’s surrounding.

B. Any applicable design guidelines;
Statement of Fact: Criteria Not Applicable. There are no applicable design guidelines in this neighborhood.

C. Any approved Tentative Map, Use Permit, Variance, or other planning or zoning approval that the project required; and
Statement of Fact: Criteria Satisfied. Pursuant to Section 15.04.306.030, a conditional use permit is required for new uses or development with the –S, Shoreline Overlay district. A

2 Conditional Use Permit must be approved by the Planning Commission fo r the prop osed residence. The project also observes the view corridor conditions on the parcel map.

D. The design review criteria in Section 15.04.805040.

The project must satisfy these criteria to the extent they apply. Criteria Met? A. The overall design of the pro ject, including its sc ale, massing, site plan, exterior design, and landscaping, reflects design integrity and the relationship of form and function in a coherent manner.

Yes No

B. The project design evide nces a sense of place; does not overwhelm or adversely impact adjoining properties; and respects prevailing setbacks and the scale and heights of neighboring buildings and how they relate to the street.

Yes No

C. The project’s design elements, materials, signage, and landscaping are internally consistent, fully integrated with one another, and applied in a manner that is visually consistent with the proposed architectural design.

Yes No

D. Lighting and lighting fixtures are designed to complement buildings, be of appropriate scale, provide adequate light over walkways and parking areas to create a sense of pedestrian safety, and avoid creating glare.

Yes No
E. The proposed building design and landscaping supports public safety and security by allowing for surveillance of the street by people inside buildings and elsewhere on the site. Yes No F. Landscaping is designed to be compatible with and enhance the architectural character of the buildings on site. Proposed planting materials avoid conflicts with views, lighting, and signage. Yes No

Statement of Fact (A-F): Criteria Satisfied. The project will incorporate c onditions of approvals that will modify the roof, ensure the roofing material is non -reflective, and landscape is provided along the north elevation to reduce the mass and bulk. T hese additional change s will help to enhance the design of the new residence with the p revailing pattern of homes in this neighborhood.

WHEREAS, on the basis of the application, plans, materials, and testimony received at or before the public hearing, t he City Council makes the following findings with supporting statements of fact required by Sections 15.04.806.040 and 15.04.306.030 of the Richmond Zoning Ordinance for approval of Conditional Use Permit for uses and development within an – S, Shoreline Overlay District:

A. The location of the proposed conditional use is in accordance with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan and the land use designations for the project site; Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Satisfied. The General Plan land use designation of the Project site is Hillside Residential and the zon ing designation is RL1 and –S, Shoreline Overlay District (which is the area within 100 -feet of the shoreline) . The proposed project complies with General Plan Policy LU4.I, wh ich encourages protect ing, conserving, and enhancing the Richmond shoreline. Thi s includes protecting to the maximum extent feasible views of the Bay from the street for the benefit and welfare of the public. The project design is conditioned to modify massing and bulk.

3 B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect the livability or appropriate development of abutting properties and the surrounding neighborhood;
Supporting Statement of Fac ts: Criterion Satisfied. Given that conditions of approv al will be incorporated, the design of the proposed residence will be harmonious and compatible with the surrounding buildings, and the design will appropriately consider the s ensitive nature of the coastal zone.

C. The proposed use will not create any nu isances arising from the emission of odor, dust, gas, noise, vibration, smoke, heat or glare at a level exceeding ambient conditions; Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Satisfied. The propo sed residential use is not anticipated to generate emissio ns or off -site impacts that will affect the residential character of the coastal zone of the area. have atypical emissions since it will be designed to meet the City energy reach code and current CalGreen Building Standards.

D. The proposed use complies with all applicable provisions of Article XV; and Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Not Satisfied. The project complies with the applicable provisions of the RL1 Zonin g District, such as se tbacks, parking requirements , lot coverage, and the –S, Shoreline Overlay District for the reason stated in Findings A and B above, as well as specified in the agenda reports.

E. The site of the proposed use is adequately served by highways, streets, water, sewer, and other public facilities and services.

Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Satisfied. The site is accessible and adequately served by public facilities and services, including water, sewer, and streets.

WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the underlying decision by the Plan ning Commission approving the project is supported by substantial evidence and does not constitute an abuse of discretion.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , on the b asis of the written appeal, plans, materials, agenda report, and testimony received at or before the public hearing, the City Council does hereby denies the appeal and affirms the Planning Commission’s conditional use permit and design review for the Project.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I CERTIFY, that t he foregoing resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond, California, at a regular meeting held on February 1, 2022.

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

4 ABSENT:

__________________________

CITY CLERK

_____________________
Tom Butt
MAYOR

Approved as to form:

_____________________________

CITY ATTORNEY

Attachment 2
RESOLUTION NO. 21-17

A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND

APPROVING THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DESIGN REVIEW WITH MODIFICATIONS (PLN20-043) TO CONSTRUCT A TWO-STORY, SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING ON A VACANT PARCEL AT 357 WESTERN DRIVE, SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS.

WHEREAS, Rudi Garbelmann (the "applicant") filed Planning Application PLN20-043 with the City of Richmond requesting a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review to construct a two-story, single-family dwelling on a vacant parcel (the "proposed project" or "project") at 357 Western Drive (Assessor's Parcel No. 558-185-006) (the "subject site" or "premises"); and WHEREAS, the Conditional Use Permit and Design Review are subject to the provisions of Articles 15.04.306, 15.04.805 and 15.04.806 of the Richmond Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines Section 15303(a), up to three single-family residences may be constructed under this exemption; and
WHEREAS, on November 18, 2020, the Design Review Board held a public hearing and voted to recommend denial to the Planning Commission of the design review citing their inability to make certain required Design Review findings pursuant to Section 15.04.805.050, specifically findings A, C, and D; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed project for conformance with the provisions of Sections 15.04.806 and 15.04.805 of the Richmond Zoning Ordinance related to Conditional Use Permits and Design Review, respectively, as well as all other applicable regulations, including but not limited to Sections 15.04.306 and 15.04.201.030 of the Richmond Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, on February 4, April 1, September 16, and October 7, 2021, the Planning Commission conducted properly noticed public hearings pursuant to California Government Code Section 65090 and has duly considered all written and verbal testimony presented before or during the hearing, including the agenda reports; and WHEREAS, on the basis of the application, plans, materials, and testimony received at or before the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following findings, with supporting statements of fact, regarding the applications consistency, as required by Section

15.04.805.050 of the Richmond Zoning Ordinance, for approval of the Major Design Review:

A. The General Plan and any applicable specific plans;
Statement of Fact: Criteria Satisfied. The General Plan land use designation of the Project site is Hillside Residential, and the zoning designation is RL1 with an -S, Shoreline Overlay District (which is the area within the 100-foot shoreline band). The proposed project complies October 7, 2021 1 of6 Resolution No. 21-17

with General Plan Policy LU4.1, which encourages protecting, conserving, and enhancing the Richmond shoreline, including being harmonious with the site's surrounding.

B. Any applicable design guidelines;
Statement of Fact: Criteria Not Applicable. There are no applicable design guidelines in this neighborhood.

C. Any approved Tentative Map, Use Permit, Variance, or other planning or zoning approval that the project required; and
Statement of Fact: Criteria Satisfied. Pursuant to Section 15.04.306.030, a conditional use permit is required for new uses or development with the -S, Shoreline Overlay district. A Conditional Use Permit must be approved by the Planning Commission for the proposed residence. The project also observes the view corridor conditions on the parcel map.

D. The design review criteria in Section 15.04.805040.

The project must satisfy these criteria to the extent they apply.Criteria Met? A. The overall design of the project, including its scale, massing, site plan, exterior design, and landscaping, reflects design integrity and the relationship of form and function in a coherent manner.

YesNo D
B. The project design evidences a sense of place; does not overwhelm or adversely impact adjoining properties; and respects prevailing setbacks and the scale and heights of neighboring buildings and how they relate to the street.

YesNo D
C. The project's design elements, materials, signage, and landscaping are internally consistent, fully integrated with one another, and applied in a manner that is visually consistent with the proposed architectural design.

YesNo D
Lighting and lighting fixtures are designed to complement buildings, be of appropriate scale, provide adequate light over walkways and parking areas to create a sense of pedestrian safety, and avoid creating glare.

YesNo
E. The proposed building design and landscaping supports public safety and security by allowing for surveillance of the street by people inside buildings and elsewhere on the site.YesNo F. Landscaping is designed to be compatible with and enhance the architectural character of the buildings on site. Proposed planting materials avoid conflicts with views, lighting, and signage.YesNo D Statement of Fact (A-F): Criteria Satisfied. The project will incorporate conditions of approvals that will modify the roof, ensure the roofing material is non-reflective, and landscape is provided along the north elevation to reduce the mass and bulk. These additional changes will help to enhance the design of the new residence with the prevailing pattern of homes in this neighborhood.

WHEREAS, on the basis of the application, plans, materials, and testimony received at or before the public hearing, the Planning Commission makes the following findings with supporting statements of fact required by Sections 15.04.806.040 and 15.04.306.030 of the October 7, 20212 of 6Resolution No. 21-17

Richmond Zoning Ordinance for approval of Conditional Use Permit for uses and development within an -S, Shoreline Overlay District:

A. The location of the proposed conditional use is in accordance with the General Plan and any applicable specific plan and the land use designations for the project site; Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Satisfied. The General Plan land use designation of the Project site is Hillside Residential and the zoning designation is RL1 and -S, Shoreline Overlay District (which is the area within 100-feet of the shoreline). The proposed project complies with General Plan Policy LU4.1, which encourages protecting, conserving, and enhancing the Richmond shoreline. This includes protecting to the maximum extent feasible views of the Bay from the street for the benefit and welfare of the public. The project design is conditioned to modify massing and bulk.

B. The location, size, design, and operating characteristics of the proposed use will be compatible with and will not adversely affect the livability or appropriate development of abutting properties and the surrounding neighborhood;
Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Satisfied. Given that conditions of approval will be incorporated, the design of the proposed residence will be harmonious and compatible with the surrounding buildings, and the design will appropriately consider the sensitive nature of the coastal zone.

C. The proposed use will not create any nuisances arising from the emission of odor, dust, gas, noise, vibration, smoke, heat or glare at a level exceeding ambient conditions; Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Satisfied. The proposed residential use is not anticipated to generate emissions or off-site impacts that will affect the residential character of the coastal zone of the area. have atypical emissions since it will be designed to meet the City energy reach code and current CalGreen Building Standards.

D. The proposed use complies with all applicable provisions of Article XV; and Supportina Statement of Facts: Criterion Not Satisfied. The project complies with the applicable provisions of the RL1 Zoning District, such as setbacks, parking requirements, lot coverage, and the-S, Shoreline Overlay District for the reason stated in Findings A and B above, as well as specified in the agenda reports.

E. The site of the proposed use is adequately served by highways, streets, water, sewer, and other public facilities and services.

Supporting Statement of Facts: Criterion Satisfied. The site is accessible and adequately served by public facilities and services, including water, sewer, and streets.

NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review set forth in Exhibit A (PLN20-043), subject to the following conditions of approval:

1. Development is to be constructed in compliance with the Project Plans in Exhibit A, October 7, 2021 3of6 Resolution No. 21-17

attached, submitted to and dated August 9, 2021, by the Planning Department. Any modifications shall be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator who shall determine whether the modification requires additional approval.

2. The design of the roof shall be modified to decrease the slope of the butterfly roof and/or ceiling heights per the revised elevation submitted on September 28, 2021 (see Attachment 1).

3. Material samples for the proposed metal roof shall be provided to ensure it is a non- reflective finish, subject to the review and approval by the Community Development Director. If the coating of the roofing material is found to be reflective, substitute roofing material shall be required.

4. The north elevation shall integrate design features or landscaping to reduce the mass and bulk of the building.

5. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant shall demonstrate that all exterior lighting has been designed and located so that all direct light is confined to the property and is satisfactory to the Community Development Director or his/her designee. Lighting shall be indirect (up or down with alabaster lens or with alabaster color lens) with a maximum 3000K if LED.

6. Failure to abide and faithfully comply with any and all conditions attached to this approving action shall constitute grounds for the revocation of said action by the Richmond Planning Commission.

7. Illuminated building street address numbers, as required by the Fire Department, shall be provided.

8. During construction activities, the applicant shall reduce or prevent to the maximum extent practicable the direct or indirect discharge of any dust or pollutant into the storm drain system utilizing best management practices contained in the California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook for Construction Activities. Construction activities include but are not limited to: watering operations; roadwork and paving operations; concrete and painting; structure construction and painting; construction material storage and handling; construction waste/debris storage and disposal; and, construction equipment/vehicle cleaning, maintenance and fueling operations. The project sponsor is also responsible for training all contractors and subcontractors on the best management practices identified in the California Storm Water Best Management Practices Handbook for Construction Activities which shall be made available by the project sponsor at the pre- construct meeting of the project.

9. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Richmond Public Services/Engineering Department for all work within the Public right-of-way. All curb, gutter, and sidewalk replacement shall conform to City of Richmond standards. Should any infrastructure be damaged or destroyed as a result of the construction of the project, the applicant shall be responsible for returning the infrastructure to an acceptable condition as determined by the City of Richmond Public Works Director.

October 7, 2021 4of6 Resolution No. 21-17

10. The applicant shall repair all damaged sidewalk, pavement, existing curb and gutter along the project frontage to the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Services Director and City Engineer prior to occupancy. The applicant shall replace any damaged landscaping, improvements, or street improvements caused by the installation of utility services and construction of the project to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning and Building Services Director.

11. All new electrical lines and connections to the site shall be under grounded to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Planning and Building Services Director.

12. Any relocation of existing improvements or public utilities shall be accomplished under the direction of the City or impacted utility company's requirement at no expense to the City or utility company

13. The applicant agrees, on behalf of himself, his successor in interest and assigns, to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its Council, Planning Commission, advisory boards, officers, employees, consultants and agents (hereinafter "City") from any claim, action or proceeding (hereinafter "Proceeding") brought against the City to attack, set aside, void or annul the City's actions regarding any development or land use permit, application, license, denial, approval or authorization, including, but not limited to, variances, use permits, developments plans, specific plans, general plan amendments, zoning amendments, approvals and certifications pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, and/or any mitigation monitoring program, or brought against the City due to acts or omissions in any way connected to the applicant's project, but excluding any approvals governed by California Government Code Section 66474.9. This indemnification shall include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against the City, if any, and costs of suit, attorney's fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether incurred by applicant or City. If applicant is required to defend the City as set forth above, the City shall retain the right to select the counsel who shall defend the City.

I CERTIFY, that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Richmond, California, at a regular meeting held on October 7,2021.

AYES: Commissioners Agarwal, Harrison, Huang, and Soofani NOES:

ABSTENTIONS: Commissioner Brubaker
ABSENT: Chair Tucker and Vice Chair Loy
October 7, 2021 5 of 6 Resolution No. 21-17

'Tuc^i^

DAVID TUCKER

CHAIR, RICHMOND PLANNING COMMISSION
Approved as to form:

JAI^S ATENCIO

SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
Exhibit A: Project Plans
Attachment 1: Building Elevation Dated September 28, 2021.

October 7, 2021 6 of 6 Resolution No. 21-17

PROJECT TEAM
OWNER

RUDI GARBELMANN
P.O. BOX 70371
RICHMOND. UM607
[email protected]
(415)636.1786

ARCHFTECT

GUNKEL ARCHTTECTURE
22?5 SAN PABLO AVENUE
BERKELET, CA. 94702
[51D.)9B4-)])Z

NEW SINGLE FAMILY
HOME
357 WESTERN DRIVE, RICHMOND, CA 94801

DESCRIPTION OF WORK
lUaiON OF NEW SINGLE-FAMUT DWELUNG P^TOIUES) 0

SYMBOLS
©
[NmUOR ELEVATION

DEMDUTION NOTE

IMPHOVEMENTNOTE

RNISH NOTE
®
0 m

PROJECT INFORMATION
LOTSE£ 6,000 SF
MAX ALLOWABLE HEIGHT; 3?-C"
ACTUAL HEIGHT; IB'-) I'ATHIGH POINT ONLY, RECT OF HOUSE IS LCWEft MAX FLOOR AREA, AU.OWED: 2.BOO SF
TOTAL HJOOK AREfc U40 SF 1?TAND 2ND R.OOn + -WO EF GARAGE ^JBO SF TOTAL MAX COVERAGE Z700,-<5X
PROFOS® COVEBASE: l.»M SF, 32-;
SPRINKLERS: YES

CODE COMPLIANCE
201T CAUFORNIA BUILDING CODEtlNCOftPOStATES B'TADOPTK

CODE COUNCIL ICQ
20t? CALIFORNIA KESID&HIU.CODE-APFUES TO ONEANDTWO?M1LT HOUSE ANOTOWNHONES L£SS THAN I STOIUB IN HBGHT. (INCORPORATES BY ADOPTION AND REPRINTC THE 2019 .CODE)
'CAUFO?
CODE'
AGENCY. NFPA) • •
PLUMBING CODE WITtiCUjroRNIA AMENDMENTS. PUBUSHEDBTTHElMTERNATIONAL/iSSOOATION :1M&WMO)
2019 CALGREEN CODE -APPUES TO CEflTAIN NEW BU1LD1NC3 ONLY . AU. NEW RESIDEtfflAL BUILDINGS 3 ENERGY REPOKT.

ASSESSOR'S MAP
r- m?M&«
"'-""•ill-""™

VICINITY MAP
*>»<„

SHEET INDEX

ARCHITECTURAL

BUILSABLE AREA DIAGRAM

STTE PLAN DIAGRAM
CONDmONS OF APPROVAL
•LANDSCAPE PLAN
:STTE FLAW ROOF PLAN

UNE ELEVATIONS
UNEBBWT10NS
^^
.S3-
^.0-
^<«
rt.
>

DESIGN REVIEW UPDATE
TO. I

Neighborhood Outreach & Design Review Timeline
11 meetincis over 22 months
Project Kick-off
Met with neighbors
Second Neighborhood
Council Meeting -
Project ADDroval
DRB Subcommittee
Meeting
Planning
Commission
Meeting #1
Feb Oct Nov April
DRB Subcommittee
Review Meeting
for PC
Planning
Commission
Meeting
Continued #4
2020 2020 2021 2021
First Neighborhood
Council Meeting
DRB Study Session DRB Final
Meeting-Staff
Recommended
Approval
Planning
Commission
Meeting
Continued #2
Planning
Commission
Meeting
Continued #3
Improvements made along the way include:

1. Reduction in the height of the house facing neighbors during neighborhood council

2. Narrowed the foyer in front of the house facing the neighbors during DRB review

3. Reduced the pitch of the roof to make it less stark and changed reflective building materials for DRB

4. Provided additional view studies requested by the Design Review Board

5. Met with DRB subcommittee again & provided additional view studies requested by the Planning Commission

6. Removed the rooftop deck to preserve the privacy of the neighbors during PC

7. Further reduced the pitch of the roof and added a flat roof section for the PC BCDC Shoreline Overlay District Restrictions
The BCDC issued a permitto build in 2012 (permit #M1986.015.02B) with the following restrictions to accommodate neighbors' privacy and protect public views, which was subsequently approved by the Planning Commission:

1. Maximum height limited to 28ft for the first 29ft of the street-side property line

2. No windows for the first 29ft of the street-side property line

3. No rooftop deck for the first 29ft of the street-side property line

4. A larger rear setback to maintain a distance of 17ft from the cliff's edge

5. An established view corridor 5ft wide, along the southern property line

6. An established view corridor 10ft wide, along the northern property line We have followed all BCDC restrictions, and have actually lowered the house by over 6ft under the maximum allowable height to further protect neighbors' views, in addition to narrowing the footprint of the home by 6ft to provide a more expansive water view for neighbor Simon Winor across the street.

Project Revisions:

Since project kick-off in late 2019, we have met with neighbors multiple times and made numerous revisions. The home is much shorter and narrower than current standards allow and lower than previously established BCDC restrictions. We installed story poles and worked closely with our neighbors through the Point Richmond Neighborhood Council and after revisions, received unanimous approval from the Council. Compared to other homes in the neighborhood, this project is quite modest in size and celebrates the diversity of home designs that define the unique character of the Point. We then made additional changes for the DRB but unfortunately the members could not reach a consensus to provide a recommendation to the Commission.

Oct
2021
u
a:
3 u
UI
I
u
D:
<
J
Ill
^
z
3 0
UJ
3 z
UJ
><
0 J
m
2:
z
<in
in
0-
rM
Sb
m ^ n
I!8
[U '
a:
? ^h co< U 5.

U UI
I 0
D S
IT v
s ^ri y ^
S Z 0
iu 5 I
m 0 n-
.^r]*l
%-l
^yj'
LU 0
> °°
gs
Q<
zu
a: .
iu Q
:fcz; So
^1
^5
"5

REVIEWS AND

REVISIONS
1 AT
TI.O

357 Western D r,
Richmond, CA 94801
5®^jSB^
^z

VIEW ANGLE

STUDY-KEY
iTl.la

3AI ANGLE 3 BUTTERFLY ROOF
2AI ANGLE 2 BUTTERFLY ROOF

IAI ANGLE I BUTTERFLY ROOF
u
D:
3 D
HI
I
u
n:
<
-I
3 d
s
E<E
th
u
u
z
w
sua
^
lu n
QNz ^
UJ 0
><
3 <5i u
<c
a.
iyui [j
s i
?1 US m
lh<
s
0 u
u
fr
3 hu
u
I-
I
u
n
<i
Ill
^
z
3 0
,2.'
s^?1
u
0 I
LU
>
a;
Q
z
a.

LU
I-
wLU
^
[s^
mm
m
^
CO
0^
0 in
u
z
0 I
u.
/S9
0 co
'T
CT<
<
u
Q
z
0 2:

I
u
a:

VIEW ANGLE
STUDY
DESIGN FtEVtE^
•••••

"M I '
"y^A;^.-' /
N78°36'10"E 43.82'..^--'' .'^•bv--SK \. /
..^\\y ^ i .-•'.
>
s?> c
°s
> >
n oa
1^
_2

HEW SINGLE FAMILY
HOME
357 WESTERN DRIVE
RICHMOND, CA 94801

GUNKEL ARCHITECTURE
2295 SAN PABLO AVENUE
BERKELEY CA 94702
GUNKELARCHITECTURE.COM
PHONE: (510) 984 - 1112

N 78°36' 10" E 43.82'^ - ' /^;,
•\\.i-
^•Wlh
57vifwc^RRIDVOR^ 4 A^^\Y)t/f-f^^^EV^bRRl5o^J:
^.^
•I
•
w
0 z
<
3 c
-I
a S2
> ^
s?^3 Z

NEW SINGLE FAMILY
HOME
357 WESTERN DRIVE
RICHMOND, CA 94801

GUNKEL ARCHITECTURE
2295 SAN PABLO AVENUE
BERKELEY CA 94702
GUNKELARCHITECTURE.COM
PHONE; (510) 984 " 1112

3 I SOUTH EAST ELEVATION
LEGEND
OMGINALLYSUBMm-ED

TO NEIGHBORHOOD

COUNCIL
ORIGINALLY SUBMm-ED

TO DESIGN REVIEW
BOARD

PORTIONS OF HOUSE TO

BE BELOW CURRENT
GRADE

EXISTING GRADE UNE

NORTH EAST ELEVATION
ya
^u
I
u
D:
<
_1
HI
2 z
b
>-
E
<c
Ui
u
u
x
a
s
LL) n
3 9
z '»
u d.
5<
0 <
n 0
^
Q.
z >< UI
'" ^.
sllS 3
0 u
u
E.

D
u
h
I
D
D:
<JHI
^
z
3 0
^K?
u
0 B
LU
>
c:
z
a:

LU
I-
C/t
LU
5:

LH
m
HEIGHT
n
•^
§
0 m
IU
0 D.
0 00
•^"
V-
<
u
Q
z
0 z
I
u
0;

DIAGRAMS
1 ATE 9i:
.TE
T1.4

WEST ELEVATION W/ 2 HOUSES ON LEFT ADJUSTED TO COMPARE HIEGHT UI
a
HI
E
I
u
tt,
<
J
u
z
z
0 >
-I
E
2,
u
u
x
w
sux
ill n0NTiu d'
><
8 <
m "
<
a.

I ^'"' i
s Ii i
s g0 ::
u
HI •
Q:

D ^
^ §LJ
h
I °
D m
[E *-"

5...:u u
x z
I!o i
s
u
0 a
UJ 0
> c°
53;
Q<
zu
u: -
LU Q
fcz
LU 0
^1
1^1
!^u
m ~i

BAY VIEW
STUDY
o/
Tl
IATE ?/:

UPDATE

1.5

s"£";=3°;3*ia»;
'S3U'S""3S
;SwSSv!-£
'S35?S£E£S
•Ka
^r5!!Sr
£3S
OmSnSS^L"ssssa"
SS5S
""r.
••-
^^^'sSiiiS's^l
'V^S:H.!a£l"^
k KA^I 5?£w -^?S
• K.gzSaS
'ICa-ss?2
lis?.:S2Ka
S;3S'| .saa,
^(ril S'^^T
SSSKSK^
""'ssss.^'
•SS3,'
-[g^^;g3,| _,„^ |.,S..|.3sass
gBS.sSS
^^"^"ss^^
- tt»H
' ngzs.a^
'""—"
m
^2£7^
ssssas
BBS;
WSi
ts S.5 ^t; S ? EAS *Ss ^ S^?ii 5S ^ 5?'
uuiin'iiiniii
y§t lili
ffiijjliiii111s 11 III IiliiUlilili
ilSBPII! tliilii ii
Illp
illliUI
ill? IHis IffillII IIill! il ^
MIll
Sja
ft0
&

CONDITIONS

OF APPROVAL

NEW SIHCLE FAMILY
HOME
357 WESTERN DRIVE
RICHMOND, CA 94801

OUNKEL ARCHITECTURE
2295 SAN PABLO AVENUE
BERKELEY CA 94702
GUNKELARCHITECTURE.COM
PHONE; (510) 984 - m2

SURVETOR'S NOTB
DATE OF SURVEY: MAY 2021.

2. UTILITIES FOUND ARE BASED UPON SURFACE EVIDENT RNDINGS,RECORDS OF UTILITIES WERE NOT UTIUZED FOR THIS SURVEY LEGEND

BOUNDARY (SMALL LOT)
TREES SHOWN ARE THOSE OF SIZE S1GN1F1 CANCEL TOE SITE CONTAINS OTHER TREES UNDER G" AND ARE NOT SHOWN FOR MAP CLARlpr, TBEE CLASS1HCA710N5 ARE TO THE BEST KNOWLEDGE OF THE SURVEYOR. AN ARBORIST MUST SPECIFY ACTUAL -TREE TfPE. TREE TRUNK LOCA-nONS ARE APPROXIMATE. TREES THAT CROSS A PROPERTY UNE AT GROUND LEVEL SHOULD BE CONSIDERED TO BE JOINTLY OWNED BY THE RESPECTIVE PROPERPr OWNERS. CONSULT AN AR80R15T FOR DETAILS.

5. PHYSiCAL 1TD-IS SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY ARE LIMITED TO THOSE SURFACE ITEMS VISIBLE AS OF THE DATE OF TOIS SURVEY AND FROM AVAILABLE RECORD DATA. SUBSURFACE OBJECTS, IF ANY, MAY NOT BE SHOWN. SAID SUBSURFACE 03JECTS MAY INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT UMITCD TO, UNDERGROUND UTILITY UNES, UTIUTC VAULTS. CONCRETC FOOTINGS, SLABS, SHORING, STRUCTURAL PILES. PIPING, UNDERGROUND TANKS, AND ANY OTHER SUSSURFACE STRUCTURES NOT REVEALED BY A SURFACE ]NSPECT10N.

6. DlMENStDMS SHOWN HEREON ARE GROUND DISTANCES IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF.

BASIS OF BEARINGS

BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE

FOUND REBAR AND CAPS

MARKING -THE NORTHERN

UNE OF WESTERN DRIVE

FLOW LINE OF THE SANITARY

SEWER MANHOLE AT THE

INTERSECTION OF WESTERN

AND SANTA FE
INVERT ELEV.= 36.82 FEET
8ASED ON NGVD1929 DA-TUM

GREENHILL/SCHWIMMER
D.N. 2019-900857
PARCEL MAP MS 756-08
BOOK 213 OF PARCEL MAPS 18
-SARBERMAW]
ZOIS<008G577
GIN]
APN 558-030-003
SURVEYORS STATaiElffi
THIS MAP CORRECTLY REPRESENTS^

I CONFORMANCE
TtiE REQUIREMEtiTTS OF THE LAND SURVEYORACT IN W\\

PARCEL WAS ESTABLISHED BY FOUND MONUMENTATION

LOCATING THE SUBJECT PARCEL
H.OWL1NE

TOP OF CUF
EDGEOFPAVEMEN1

CONCRETE

LIP OF GUTTER
GROUND
ASPHALT COr

TOP OF CURB

FINISH FLOOR
SETBACK UN Page 695 of 846
aueoniMis
_vyAj.-^&Z??/.

PLANTING SUGGESTIONS
DEdDUOUS TREES
Japanese Maple
Be+ula

DECIDUOUS SHRUBS
Rosa 'Iceberg'

EVERGREEN SHRUBS
Euonymous 'Green Spire'
Junipers
Laurel nobilis
Pittosporum 'Golf Ball'
Nandina 'Monum'
Thuga 'Emergald Green'
or "Daniellow'
Thuga Green Giant'
Podocarpus

PERENNIALS
Salvia species Penstemon
species Phormium 'Tom
Thumb'

GRASSES & SEDGES
Carex species'
Chondropetalum
tec+orum

SUCCULENTS
Agave species
Dudleya species

GROUNDCOVERS
Ceanothus
Junipers
Manzanita

CLIMBERS
Clematis species Lonicera
species
ve-tisvJAf
C^M^f
^^'^_\^e?[?£N&!£!^;. -
Wit veuc-c
^ Al-i-Tj-WnHtri-HPeyerMApa?
viwl &Oizp-rDse=i^'6e ^-s' HT".
t^KAyet..

P.ff^'SFFJ-evs.
t^,'
".Wffl//w^/A~.
^D: .^...MS^^v\w3-
-Tor o^.'u.ors-

CHRISTINE KRAUSE DESIGN STUDIO
CHRISTINEKRAUSEDESIGN.COM
[email protected]
CHRISTINEKRAUSEDESIGN.COM

GARBELMAN RESIDENCE
157 WESTERN DRIVE
RICHMOND, CA 94801
DRAWING: PLANTING. DESIGN PLAN
•SCALE: 1/8"=1-0" '
DATE: 6 JAN 2020
REVISED: 27 MAY 2020
DRAWN BY: Christine Krause

DRAINAGE
!. SITE RETAINING WALLS & FOUNDATIONS TO
HAVE FRENCH DRAINS AT BASE TTP. HARD PIPE

TO DISSIPATORS OR LANDSCAJ'JNG
Z. ALL ROOF DRAINS ROUTED TO DISSIPATOR IN

HARD PIPE

OUTFAU, DISSIPATOR
SII°23'50"E 0.60'
377 WESTERN DRIVE
(E) SINGLE FAMILY
HOME
\
NOTE: ALL ROOF DRAINAGE TO BE COLLECTED TO DOWNSPOUTS TO BE CONNECTED TO (N) TIGHTLINE DRAIN SYSTEM -S--_^
Nw

SITE PLAN
5 o
z ^
Ill O*
><
8 m
<
Q.

S 3
Q B
u
tU '
Q:
? s
< U fr
U UI
\_
I °
U 5
a: '-"
u I
u u
^ z
5 0
31 s
K
iu o
> co
'^
Q<i*u.Q<
UEiu
LU Q
0 ^
wX B LU 0
y»
u
^5
m5

SITE PLAN/

ROOF PLAN

VIEW UPDATE
AO.I

AWN FX AWN
(S'.fi-AJ.F,) (5'-6"AJ.F.) (S'.6"A.F.F.}
4>
N
HI
ec.
3 u.
[U
i<
_I
Ill
2 z
3 0
5 E
<Eu;
u
0 a
tfl
Iua
m n
0Nz ^
LU 0'
><
3 <^ u
<
a.
z >< m'"' i
£ ^?; 5
N ffl
»(
6 u
1U
u:
3hu
u
I-
I
D
or
3 LU
^
z
3 0
/z-
s^*
u
0 z
UI
>
OL
z
a:

LU
h-
(/)
UJ
^
in
m
m
^r
a
0 0
m
u
z
0 I
a.
/5l
000
^-
0 <
u
Q
z
0 s
I
D
Q^

FIRST FLOOR
DES1GI
PLAN
REV ^
<TE ?/21
Al
UPDATE
•o0FIRST FLOOR. PLAN

3'-0nx3'-0" 3'.0"x3'^"
t-i'-O" ABOVE (I W ABOVE
2ND[€OORTF.1— — —FO~rER FLOORT — ~T — — ^i
N
Ul
a.
3 u
1U
h
u
a
<
_1
Ill
g
z
3 0
5 E
<E
Ui
u
•I
u
x
w
I
<?1
U fN0
Nz ^
U 0
^
0 <
^ u
<
Q.
z >
< ^
" iii
^m g
K uK m
na<
0 D
UJ
a.
3 I-
D
1U
h
I
D
IT
<J
UI
^
z
3 0
^
u
0 Ill
>
c^
z
aL
LU
I-
wLU
^
N
U1
m
N
s
0-
0 ^
LU
z
0 I
D.
w
0 co
^0^
<
D
Q
z
0 s
z
u
0;
SECOND
FLOOR.

REV1E
DATE 9/2E
Al
PLAN
•
IATE

ISECOND FLOOR PLAN

r ^
;0
0 0
>
2 NEW SINGLE FAMILY
HOME
357 WESTERN DRIVE
RICHMOND, CA 94801

GUNKEL ARCHITECTURE
2295 SAN PABLO AVENUE
BERKELEY CA 94702
GUNKELARCHITECTURE.COM
PHONE: (510) 984 - 1112

SOUTH ELEVATION
g [p

WEST ELEVATION

MATERIALS
[T] NATURAL WOOD
SIDING
[2] MEDIUM GREY
INTEGRAL COLOR.

CEMENT PLANTER.
[3] NATURAL WOOD,
TRELUS
[4] MEDIUM WHITE

INTEGRAL COLOR

CEMENT PLASTER
Fs1 CLEAR ANODIZED
ALUMINUM FASOA.

WINDOWS & DOORS
[|j OBSCURED GIASS
[7] STANDING SEAM

METAL ROOF W/

KYNAR MEDIUM GRAY
FINISH
s:. —=;a
PS] miNLESS STEEL
RAILS. POSTS &
CABLES
u
a
s
I
u
^
u
2 3
0 5
E
KUi
u
0 x
w
Iid
a
U t
IIIll (
s
q .
~i (
£
Il
" i
!P i°< i
P! i
»1
e
B
0 u
u
D:
3huUl
h
I
D
D:
<
-J
u
^
z
3 0
X-5
UJ
>
a:
z
Q;
LU
I-
t/1
LU
^
[^
wm
n
•q-
co
0'
0 in
u
z
0 I
a.
0 co
•^-
<r
<
u
Q
z
0 2:
x
u
(^

ELEVATIONS
DESK
D/SATE < ZB/21
Al.l
'DATE
I

>
»
®
w
^ij z
0 m
z

NEW SINGLE FAMILY
HOME
357 WESTERN DRIVE
RICHMOND, CA 94801

OUNKEL ARCHITECTURE
2295 SAN PABLO AVENUE
BERKELEY CA 94702
GUNKELARCHITECTURE.COM
PHONE: (510) 9B4 - 1112Page 703 of 846
m
1^1
m
Ill0
l1

1.1 si
B
S3
B
Q
E B B
I
B B
&
w
9 w
<>
-f
0 z

NEW SINGLE FAMILY
HOME
357 WESTERN DRIVE
RICHMOND, CA 94801

GUNKEL ARCHITECTURE
2295 SAN PABLO AVENUE
BERKELEY CA 94702
GUNKELARCHITECTURE.COM
PHONE: (S10) 984 - 1112Page 704 of 846
-^.|3| SECTION
I
JJ_

REAR OF HOUSE
u
St
?
u
u
i
u
Ct
<
-1
s
z
3 0
5 c
Ct
Uh
u
0 a
(8
I
'y
llj m
QNz y
u ^
i
3 <^ 0
<
a.
i yU1 ui
s i?; i?N m
^
="
u
ii
0 u
u
a.

D
I-
u
UJ
h
I
u
(t
<
1U
X
z
3 u
'z-'
?$
LU
>
aL
z
a.

LU
I-
LO
UJ
^
^
in
m
m
t
co
t>
0 in
u
z
0 I
Q.
0 co
^-
0^
<
u
Q
z
0 z
I
u
tt.

BUILDING

SECTIONS
UP
A3.®

STAIR SECTION
^SSs^
GARAGE
HIGHE?rEX]SI'NS.G«?E---
LOWEST EXISTING GRADE"

RETAINING WALL IN FRONT OF SECTION
^
1R11EWAK
-<&_-—
_ _ _ — -T.STSf

SECTION

uu o
> co
SI
zu
a: -
LU Q

eiK. - -1706 (01.9) :3NOHd
W03'3anj.33-LIH3aV-]3XNnO
COZtr6 V3 A3~13>ia3a
3nN3AV 0-ISVd NVS S6ZZ
aynj-osjLiHsuv ^^>^Nno
108fr6 V3 'QNONH
3AI-aa N~a3J.S3AA ;
3MOH
jniuwd aiDNis
Attachment 1

EI a E]

SOUTH ELEVATION
M
St
?
u
1U
I
u
a
<
J
u
2 z
3 0
5 E
a,
u
ia
w
Iux
fc^
uj n01\z ^
u as
><
s <
ffl "
<
D.
z >
< ^
" i
£ IS uF! 3
•ai
="
u
0 3;
0 u
UJ
0:
3 I-
uUJ
I-
I
u
D:
<
-1
HI
^
z
3 0
/z.l
N
^co
ok
0 in
u
z
0 I
Q.
^
UJ
>
a:

Q
z
aL
LU
I-
LO
LU
^:

N
wm
0 00
^0^
<
u
Q
z
0 z
I
u
a:

ELEVATIONS
DESIG1 REV I E^
1ATE ?/3
Al<
UPDATE
• 3

MATERIALS
T [P Q] NATURAL WOOD SIDING
[2] MEDIUM GREY INTEGRAL
COLOR CEMENT PLASTER.
[3] NATURAL WOOD. TRELUS
[4] MEDIUM WHITE INTEGRAL
COLOR. CEMENT PLASTER.
[5} CLEAR ANOD1ZED ALUMINUM
FASC1A, WINDOWS & DOORS
[6] OBSCURED GLASS
0 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
W/ KYNAR. MEDIUM GRAY FlNISHl
[8] STAINLESS STEEL RAILS. POSTS 8
CABLES

WEST ELEVATION

Attachment 3
RESOLUTION NO. 128-09
A RESOLUTION OF THE CTt-V COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND

ADOPTING A MFTIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND APPROVING PARCEL MAP MS 756-08 TO CREATE ONE LOT AT 367 WESTERN DRIVE CKOWALSKI, APN 558-185-003)
WHEREAS, Stephen & Patti Kowalski (the "appUcmt"), filed an application wifh the City of Richmond for approval of proposed parcel map MS 756-08 (title "Parcel Map") to subdivide the existing parcel (the "subdivision." or "project') at 367 Western Drive (APN: 558- 185-003) (the "project site" or "subject site") into two standard residential parcels of 10,806 Square Feet and 6,002 Square Feet, respectively; and
WHEREAS, fhe Parcel Map is subject to the provisions of California Government Code Sections 66410-66499.58, known as the Subdivision Map Act, and Chapter .15.08 of fhe Richmond Municipal Code known as the Richmond Subdivision Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Parcel Map is not categorically exempt from fhe California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) by way of CEQA Guidelmes Section 15315, Class 15, Minor Land Divisions, due to the fact fhat the slope is greater than 20 percent. Therefore, staff conducted an Initial Study; determined that the project could have potentially significant impacts infhe areas ofAesflietics, Geology and Soils, and Hydrology and Water Quality; and WHEREAS, staff prepared a Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration which includes a Preliminary Soils Investigation and Initial Geology and Soils Analysis. Based on such investigation and analysis, staff determined that implementation of specific mitigation measures will reduce environmental impacts to less-fhan-significaat; and WHEREAS the Draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for public comment in accordaace wifh fhe California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and a response to comments was prepared; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning District at -fhe subject property is zoned SFR-2, Single Family Very Low Density Residential District, which permits residential dwellings on lot sizes of 6,000 SP or greater, and fhe General Plan designation of the site is 942, Very Low Density Residential (0 to 5 DU/Acre), which allows single family residential dwellings in areas typified by relatively large lots greater than 6,000 SF; and
WHEREAS, fhe City Council has reviewed fhe Parcel Map for conformance with the Subdivision Map Act, Subdivision Ordinance, 'Zoning Ordiaance and all other applicable regulations offhe Richmond Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a properly noticed public hearmg pursuant to California Government Code Section 65090 and has duly considered all written and verbal testimony presented during the hearing; and
WHEREAS, on fhe basis of the application, plans, materials, and testimony submitted at or prior to the public hearing, the City Council makes the foUowmg findings with statements of fact to support fhe findings as required by California Government Code Section 66474 for fhe approval of Parcel Map:

Findrng 1. The proposed Map is consistent with the applicable General a&d Specific Plans.

Statement in Support of Findine: Criterion Satisfied. The Richmond General Plan designation for the project site is 942, Very Low Residential. The subdivision meets all . the applicable provisions of the Richmond General Plan by creating a buildable lot which is equal to or greater than 6,000 SF. The proposed Lot 2 would meet the development standards for the minimum lot size in the SPR-2 Zoning District, v?ith a. proposed area of 6,002 SP. The proposed Lot 2 will also meet the development standards for the miiumum lot width of 60 Feet in the SFR-2 Zoning District; the proposed lot width will be 69 ft.
128-09
Page I

Findme 2, The design of lots, streets, open space, draiaage, sewers, water and other improvements are consistent with fhe Zoning Ordinance.

Statement in Support ofFindmg: Criterion Satisfied. The subdivision wiU result in a lot configuration fcat is common in fhis neighborhood. The project site is adjacent to existing residential buildiags, wifti landscaping and drainage, sewer, water and ofher utility improvements fhat are consistent with fhe Richmond Zoning Ordmmce. If any new utilities are desired, tiiey would be required to comply with. fce Riclunond Zonmg Ordinance and fhe requirements of the Public Works Department and respective utility company.

FindmeS. The site is physically suitable for the type of development.

Statement in Support ofFmding: Criterion Condifionally Satisfied. The subdivision is for fhe purpose of subdividing the existing lot into two lots for an additional residential dwelling unit. The newly created Lot I would be physically suitable for development with fhe implementation of fhe laiti.gati.ons indicated m fhe Mitigating Monitormg and Reporting Program (Attacbnent 2). New off-street parldng would be required for Lot 1 as a result offhis subdivision in order to meet fhe parking requirements offhe Richmond Zoning Ordmanoe.

Pindme; 4. The site is physically suitable for fhe proposed density of development.

Statement in Support ofPinding: Criterion Satisfied. The subject site is presently served by a31 requisite public facilities and services such as gas, water md eleotncity, and fhe lot size of 6,002 SP is larger fhan tie imnimnm required lot size in Ifae 942 General Plan designated district, and fhe SER.-2 Zoning Distnct.

Fiadmg 5. The design oftiae subdivision or fhe proposed improvements is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or fheir habitat
Statement in Support of Fmdine: Criterion Satisfied. The subdivision will not cause substantial environmental damage because fhe existing lot is currently part of an exiting residential property. Future improvements of fhe lot would be typical of ofher improvements in this neighborhood and -would have to conform to fee Development Standards offhe SFR-2 Zonmg Distnct.

Finding 6. The design of fhe subdivision or fte type of improvements is not Ekely to cause serious public healfli problems.

Statement in Support ofFmdiag: Criterion Satisfied. The design offhe subdivision is not likely to cause serious public health problems as it proposes to subdivide an exiting lot istotwo residential lots.

Fmdmg 7. The design of the subdivision or fhe type of improvements wiU not conflict -with easements, acquired by fhe public at large, for access fhrough or use of, property -witlun the proposed subdivision.

Statement m Support of Pinding: Criterion Satisfied. Tentative Subdivision Map MS 756-08 does not conflict wifh any fccio-wrL existing public easements as shown in. Exhibit A.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT KESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Richmond, does hereby grant approval of Parcel Map 756-08 subject to the following conditions of approval:

1. Conformaace to Parcel Map: The Parcel Map shall be in substantial conformance with flie Parcel Map in Exhibit A, prepared by Bay Area Land Surveying Inc., submitted to and date-stamped received by &e Richmond Plamiiag and Buildmg Services Department on April 24, 2009. Prior to finalizing the Parcel Map, it shall be submitted to fhe Engineeriag Depailment for review and approvalPage 710 of 846 accompanied by the requisite review fee. The Parcel Map must be prepared, wet sigaed and sealed by a civil engineer or land surveyor, registered and licensed in the State of California.

2. Implementation of the Mitigation Monitorme and Reporting Proei-ami The applicant shall implement Mitigation Measures I-A, VI-A, and VHI-A, as indicated in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ra fhe Mitigated Negative Declaration (Exhibit C).

3. lademrdfication; To the fullest extent permitted by law, the subdivide!- shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City ofRicbnond, its Council, Boards, Commissions, agents, officers, employees, consultants, successors and assigns from and against any and all claims, demands, obligations, proceedings, actions, causes of action, suits, losses, judgments, fines, penalties, damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including, without Itmitation, attorney's fees, disbursements, and all other professional or expert fees and costs) (individually a "Claim," collectively "Claims") which may arise to attack, set aside, void, or aimul the - project approvals, or any project condition imposed by the City or any of its agencies. Departments, Commissions, Boards, agents, officers, employees, or Council concerning said project, which Claim, is brought iu accordance with all applicable laws related thereto aad within the time period provided by law, moluding but not limited to, aay claitn for private attorney general fees olaimed by or awarded to any party fi-om City. The City of Richmond shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in fhe defense.

4. Utilities: Any new utilities are required to comply with the Zomng Ordinance, fhe requirements of the Public Works Department, and respective utility company.

5. Easements: All existing easements related to this property shall be carried fonvard onto the Final Parcel Map mcludiag fhose required by ofher agencies.

6. Off-Steeet Parking: The applicant shall provide proper off-street parking for Lot I by constructing a two-car, tandem, parking strip wifh a one-car carport 'with a mmimum mtenor dimension of 10 feet wide and 20 foot length. This carport shall be constructed prior to the recording of the Parcel Map and conform, to fhe City's Development Standards and Building Code. Future residential development of Lot 2 will be required to include at least two covered off-street parking spaces.

7. Fencmg: In. the event a new fence is constructed on fhe property line of the newly created lot, the applicant shall construct a "good neighbor" fence.

8. Sag Francisco Bay Conservation Development Commission CBCDQ Permit:

The applicant shall apply and receive a development permit from the San Francisco Bay Conservation Development Commission (BCDC) for the proposed Parcel Map and potential easements or view corridors. A copy of the valid permit shall be forwarded to fhe Plamiing Division and the City Engineer.

9. Windows: There shall be no 2nd story windows, oiher than skylights or clerestones, built wittiin 29 feet of the street side property boundary line along the south side of any home erected on the property.

10. Deck: There shall be no roof deck built wifhin 29 feet of the street side property bouadary line on any home erected on the property.
11 .Height: Wifhin 29 feet of the street side property line, the maximum height for any home erected on the property shall be 28 feet from existing grade.

Mitigation Measures from the Mitigation Moniformg and Reporting Program:
128-09

12. The proj ect applicant for futaie development of Lot 2 shall reduce the severity of ttie project's effect on aesthetics by implementing fhe following fhe following mitigatioTi measures:
a. The future project shall be landscaped to soften the view of the development from off-site locations.
b. Landscaping shall be desigaed to be compatible with existing vegetation on site aad ia surroundmg areas.
c. The new building shall be designed to be visually compatible with fhe existing buildings.
d. The applicant shall contact the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) and apply for aU required permits prior to construction.

13. The project applicant for future development shall reduce tile severity of project effect on Geology and Soils by following the followiag mitigation measures:
a. The future project shall be designed in accordance with the 2007 California Building Code (CBC), -whiclihas been adopted by the City of Richmond. b. The rear setback for fature development of a. building shall be approximately seventeen feet (17°) &om fhe top of slope.
c. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for seditnent and erosion control shall be followed duriag construction.
d. An erosion control plan sbaU be prepared prior to issuance of a Building Permit and implemented dunng construction activities.
e. A building project shall molude measures such as selective removal of expansive soils and weathered rock in foTmdation aad concrete slab areas and replacement -with non-expaasive select fiU to mimimze 1iie potenfial daraage to site improvements.
£ AH preliminary design recommendations indicated ia fhe Preliminary Soils Investigation and Initial Geology and Soils Analysis (Appendix B) shaU be followed.

14. The proj.ect applicant for future development shall reduce the severity of project effect on Hydrology and Water Quality by followmg mitigation measures:
a. The future project will be required to provide positive runoflf. b. The future project wiU be required to incorporate pervious coverage in hardscape and landscape plans for absorption;
c. The rear setback for future development of a building shall be approximately seventeen (17) feet from fhe top of slope.
d. Best Management Practices (BMPs) for sediment and erosion control shall be followed during constmction.
****AftA****ft****A*A****ft
128-09

I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof, held on November 3, 2009, by the follov?ing vote:

AYES:

Approved:

GAYLE MCLAUGHLIN
Mayor
Approved as to form:

Councilmembers Bates, Butt, Rogers, Ritterman, Viramontes, Vice Mayor Lopez, and Mayor McLaughlin.

NOES: None.

ABSTENTIONS: None.

ABSENT: None.

DIANEHOLMES
Clerk of the City of Richmond
[SEAL]

RANDY RIDDLE
City Attorney
State of California }
County of Contra Costa
City of Richmond }
:ss.

I certify that the foregoing is a tme copy of Resolution No. 128-09, finally passed and adopted by fhe City Council offhe City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on November 3, 2009.
128-09

Attachment 4
KSehjmittwU
THIS SECTION TO BE CQnPl.ETED BY THE CITY CLERK'S OFFICE ST^P^F^Ey-T^ y
cn'Ycu^som^^O^mOHD'
ZQ210CT18 PH l:^

FEE PAID
DATE:
,<-tTD°^CUe%
TO THE RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL:

The undersigned hereby appeals decision: By the Historic Preservation Commission By the Planning Commission
of: Approval "' of: Denial
Variance (V)
*^ Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
• Design Review Permit (DRP)
Other
Tent Subd. Or Parcel Map (TM)
Rezoning (RZ)
EIR Decision (Em)
DESCRIBE ITEM AS PRINTED ON THE PLAWONG COMMISSION or
HISTORIC PRESERVATION AGENDA:

PLN20-043 Garbelman Residence: PUBLIC HEARING to consider a Conditional Use Permit and Design Review toconstruct a two-story, single-family dwelling on a vacant parcel located within the - S,Shoreline Overlay District at 357 Western Dr. (APN: 558-185-006).

STATE REASONS FOR APPEAL:

There has been inadequate process in the consideration of the applicant's plans, and violation and deprivation of the neighbor's due process in the course of the applicant's proposals to the city.

There has been consistent lack of information and unreliability of information presented to the Design Review Board and the Planning Commission. The P.C. lacked correct and reliable information to support necessary findings and to make an informed decision about the applicant's plans.

Please see the attached form for further reasons and explanations.

DELIVER OR MAIL TO:

City Clerk
450 Civic Center Plaza, 3rd Floor
Richmond, CA 94804
NAME Claire Arbour, Simon Winer and Ron Elson
,360 Western Drive, Ridunond, CA 94801
360 Western Drive, Richmond, CA 94801
TELEPHONE (HOME) (617) 699-2766
(WORK) (510)610-1166

We are appealing the decision of the PC at its October meeting of a proposal to construct a new dwelling at 357 Western Drive, item PLN20-043 Garbelman Residence.

1. We believe that substantive design issues raised both by Design Review Board and the City Staff have not been adequately addressed and that required findings have not been met. The three conditions that the Planning Commission laid out for their conditional approval were not thoroughly or clearly met.

The DRB unanimously recommended denial when the proposal was first submitted. Since then they have not reviewed any plans or revisions submitted by the applicant. Even with the minor modifications proposed since by the applicant, the project does not meet major criteria for approval. The Commissioners relied heavily on a verbal presentation by the applicant's architect at their October meeting - without their nor city staff having the chance to review the latest written revisions submitted by the applicant.

2. We question the appropriateness or legal authority for the Planning Commission to refer back to a subcommittee of the DRB rather than to the full DRB for review.

No transparency was shown in the selection of which members would be chosen; nor how they would proceed with their review. Their meetings with the applicant/ architect were not public and the public had no chance for input into the subcommittee's review. We aren't aware that their ideas or recommendations were then reviewed by the full DRB. 3, The applicant and his architect have not held discussions with community members and neighbors, despite their claim that they have.

While such discussions aren't required, they are a vital way of showing respect for the community. Balancing Individual wishes with community well-being is a major issue these days in our country and our community. It would be reasonable to propose such meetings in an effort to arrive at compromise.

4. A requirement for approval (as per Item E of Resolution 21-17, A resolution of the planning commission of the city of Richmond approving the conditional use permit and design review with modification (PLN20-043) to construct a two-story, single family dwelling on a vacant parcel at 357 Western Drive, subject to conditions) is the demonstration that the proposed development is "adequately serred by highways, streets, water, sewer, and other public facilities and services" (emphasis ours).

The present sewer system is known to be inadequate and to pose significant public health and welfare issues to the citizens of Point Richmond should it fail more than it has. A moratorium on any new connections, other than in the case of remodels of buildings that already are connected to the sewer system, appears to be de facto in place. Comments by the city council and consultants to the city have supported this moratorium. No new construction should be approved until the complex health and welfare issues are resolved.

Attachment 5
January 10,2022
In regards to our appeal, I do understand that we cannot introduce new topics at this point, and I appreciate the reminder about how the process works. I will include (below) the grounds for our appeal so that it is part of your records.

The basis of our appeal included four main points:
(1) Substantive design issues were not addressed due to the late submission of the applicant's plans and inadequate interpretation of the Shoreline Overlay District. We named the design issues as: mass of the proposed development, non-reflective surfaces and acceptable vegetation. We also specifically outlined the Shoreline Overlay District language that includes that the "development shall be sited, designed and undertaken so that it is harmonious with the character of the site and the surroundinR environmental setting to the maximum extent feasible....Buildings and landscaping in shoreline areas shall be oriented and located such that they preserve public views of the Bay from public rights-of-wav....Visual access to the Bay and scenic_vistas^fwateLand district shorelines shall be protected, and the Planning Commission may impose reasonable conditions of approval to ensure that this object is met." The Planning Commission is responsible for enforcing the Shoreline Overlay District, but it appears that there isn't a thorough understanding of the Ordinance by the City Commissioners. Due to the confusion about how to enforce the Ordinance, the Commissioners discussed it as though it is a subjective requirement and therefore difficult, if not impossible, to enforce. As residents of the neighborhood, the idea of building a house that is "harmonious with the character of the site and the surrounding environmental setting to the maximum extent feasible" does not feel confusing. It requires development that follows the contour and the slope of the land, and visual public access to the Bay for the hundreds of walkers who use our neighborhood to escape the density of the city.

The proposed development affects views from the street directly in front of the house, but also from the street above (Casey Drive) that leads to Western Drive. Public views will be impacted from several vantage points in the area.

The requirements of the City's Shoreline Overlay District Ordinance were not met because the development is not harmonious with the site, does not follow the contour of the land, and does not protect public visual access to the Bay and shoreline. The late submission of the applicant's plans did not allow the Commissioners and City Staff to effectively evaluate the proposal at the October 7th Planning Commission meeting. As a result, the Commissioners relied heavily on a verbal presentation and a drawing shared by the applicant via zoom/ without the Commissioners or City Staff having the chance to review the written revisions submitted by the applicant. Approval without reviewable plans is unacceptable.

(2) The Planning Commission approval is invalid due to violations of both the Brown Act and due process. A subcommittee of the DRB was formed, without any transparency with the public, without noticing or reporting of those meetings, and without a return to the full DRB for a vote on the applicant's plans.

According to our attorney, the Planning Commission and Design Review Board are separate deliberative bodies under the City of Richmond Municipal Code. The Planning Commission cannot set up a sub-committee of the DRB; they do not have this authority. All deliberations of the DRB must be properly noticed and conducted in public per the Brown Act. In seeking to approve the project, the Planning Commission overstepped their authority and called upon a subset of the DRB to work with the applicant, at the applicant's request (!). Any business conducted in such a meeting is invalid and cannot be used to approve of a project. The subset of the DRB provided an "active and significant" role in advising the Planning Commission and on September 16th, the applicant reported that the DRB supported his plans and approved of the changes. This is not true and is a procedural due process violation as the DRB had already acted on November 18th, 2020 with seven architects recommending denial of the applicant's project. Case law in Nightlife Partners v. the City of Beverly Hills (2003) finds that due process requires a fair and unbiased decision be made and this cannot be achieved via a subset of the DRB. The hierarchy of the Planning Commission relative to the DRB was muddled in this application, in violation of procedural due process precedent. As a result, the Planning Commission decision is invalid, and we ask that the approval be overturned. The remedy is for the applicant to be directed to return to the full Design Review Board. (3) There is a de facto moratorium on sewer hookups on Western Drive that includes this property.

The present sewer system is known to be inadequate and to pose significant public health and welfare issues to the citizens of Richmond. The City Council met on this issue on September 28, 2021 and it was stated in that meeting that despite there being several undeveloped properties along the shoreline in Point Richmond that could offer tax revenue to the city, no further sewer hookups should be permitted in the area of 357 Western Drive. Both Mayor Butt and PUblic Works Director Joe Leach said that there is a de facto moratorium on new sewer hook-ups along Western Drive.

THe approval by the Planning Commission includes the following statement: A requirement for approval is the demonstration that the proposed development is "adequately served by....sewer....and other public facilities and services".

The PC is required to make a finding that the property is served by all necessary utilities. It cannot currently make that finding about 357 Western Drive because the property is not served by a sanitary sewer system with adequate capacity for additional discharge from new construction.

I am an avid swimmer and I often swim parallel to that very sewer line. I also know that, on warm days, Keller beach and the local parks are packed with Richmond residents who seek relief from the heat of the city at our shared shoreline beaches. The sewer line is risking the health of our local community, making the shoreline unsafe for public recreation. Allowing further sewer hook-ups under the current conditions is short-sighted and, from a health perspective, unconscionable. Until this situation is remedied, no new sewer connections can be sanctioned.
(4) The applicant and his architect have not held discussions with community members and neighbors, despite their claim that they have.

While such discussions aren't required, they are a vital way of showing respect for the community. Balancing individual wishes with community well-being is a major issue these days in our country and our community. It would be reasonable to propose such meetings in an effort to arrive at compromise.

The applicant also states that the Neighborhood Council approved his plans and is in favor of his proposed development. While he did gain the approval of the Neighborhood Council, the truth is that the "plans" that were presented to the Neighborhood Council could be characterized more as pictures than as architectural plans. There were no metrics or dimensions associated with his presentation to the Neighborhood Council, and it was there that the idea of a "green wall" was introduced as a way to mitigate the enormous mass of the proposed design - a blank wall that towers over the down-hill neighbor. Instead of recommending a structure with less mass and more elegant and harmonious design, the Neighborhood Council introduced impractical ideas that were not based on reliable dimensions or metrics. The Neighborhood Council was unaware of, and so did not evaluate, the Shoreline Overlay District Ordinance.

We have offered before and will continue to suggest that City Councilmembers (and anyone else!) come to the building site. Don't take our word for it... Please come see the property and our neighborhood.

Thank you again for your time and consideration. I really appreciate all of the work that you are doing to maintain the city's integrity throughout this process.

Sincerely,
Claire

February 15, 2022

Finance Department

DATE: February 15, 2022
TO: Mayor Butt and Members of the City Council
FROM:

Anil Comelo, Interim Deputy City Manager
Belinda Brown, Director of Finance
Antonio Banuelos, Accounting Manager
LaShonda White, Interim Director of Library and
Community Services
Lina Velasco, Director of Community Development
Joe Leach, Director of Public Works

Subject:

Approval of New Fees for the Revised Master Fee
Schedule
FINANCIAL IMPACT: This update of the Master Fee Schedule adjusts User Fees by the Employment Cost Index (ECI). The ECI
adjusts for wage rate inflation in local governments. For those fees adjusted in 2020, the inflation factor is 2.3 percent. For fees previously adjusted in 2019, the ECI
adjustment is 5.2 percent.

Fees for services provided by the Finance, Information
Technology, Police, Parking Management Services, and
Community Development City departments have been
analyzed to determine the cost of providing service by
reviewing the number of hours and related expenses it
takes to complete the service. In some cases, this
resulted in a fee increase; In others, the fees were
reduced.

Based on the level of activity in the prior year, the
proposed fee adjustments would generate additional
annual revenue totaling $509,000 for the City of
Richmond across various funds.

AGENDA
REPORT

February 15, 2022

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

November 16, 2021

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

Sections 2.34.040 (Schedule of Fees and Charges) and

13.45.020 (Approval of adjustments by City Council) of
the Richmond Municipal Code authorize periodic
adjustments to all City levied fees and charges, subject to approval by the City Council. Staff is requesting adoption of an ordinance to establish new fees and charges as
outlined in the proposed Master Fee Schedule.

RECOMMENDED ACTION:

INTRODUCE an ordinance (first reading) establishing
certain fees for the proposed Master Fee Schedule -
Finance Department (Belinda Brown 510-620-
6740/Antonio Banuelos 510-620- 6741).

DISCUSSION:

Section 2.34.040 of the Richmond Municipal Code (RMC) (Schedule of fees and service charges) provides that, “The City Manager shall review the fees and charges based upon the review schedule set forth (herein) and shall set and adjust the fees or charges so as to recover up to the … costs reasonably necessary to provide the listed regulations, products or services.”

Section 13.45.020 of the RMC (Approval of adjustments by City Council) further provides that, “Each quarter, the Finance Director shall submit to the City Council a report listing all proposed adjustments for approval. No proposed adjustment shall take effect until it is approved by the City Council. The City Council may reject, but may not modify, any one or more of the proposed adjustments in any report before approving the adjustments.”

At the November 16, 2021, City Council meeting, the proposed action on the Master Fee Schedule Update was not approved. City Council requested the item be brought back after expressing concerns regarding rates for the Library Community Room and Recreation facilities. To address this request, the Master Fee Schedule maintains the original fees for the Library Community Room and includes existing fee reductions for City facilities. At a subsequent meeting, Staff will bring forth additional information regarding possible fee reductions/waivers and program partnerships for Council consideration.

February 15, 2022
To allow for the City to establish new fees and charges and therefore, collect increased revenue, it was imperative that the proposed Master Fee Schedule be brought back before City Council for approval. The Finance Department has worked with Willdan Financial Services to process the City of Richmond’s Impact Fee and User Fee reports.

The scope of services provided under this program are designed to produce reports used in the updating of the Master Fee Schedule to help better capture city costs in providing city services and to offset the impacts of new development. The Master Fee Schedule proposed for adoption by the City Council includes the following changes and/or adjustments:

 The fee schedule is adjusted to reflect the change in the Employment Cost Index (ECI), as provided in Section 13.45.010 of the RMC. To conform to legal requirements, the effective date for fees adjusted by the ECI is 30 days after City Council final approval of the ordinance amendment and adoption of the resolution.

 Impact fees are adjusted based on changes in the ECI, as provided in Section

13.45.010 of the RMC. To conform to legal requirements, the effective date for fees adjusted by the ECI is 60 days after City Council final approval of the ordinance amendment and adoption of the Master Fee Schedule resolution.

 The Community Development Department worked with NBS to process the Fee Analysis for the Housing Administration Division. Staff performed initial research to compile a list of fees charged for similar services by other agencies. This list served as a baseline for establishing a comprehensive list of fees for evaluation.

NBS and Division staff prioritized an analysis of fees for the most routine services provided by the Division. Once these fees are implemented, the Division plans to continue with analysis of additional fees that could be added during the next Master Fee Schedule Update. These new fees are listed in the Ordinance (Attachment 1).

 The fees for Commercial Solar Energy Systems are being adjusted to match the fees as listed in Assembly Bill Number 1414. This bill revised and reduced the maximum permit fees, as specified, for photovoltaic and thermal systems.

 Library staff is proposing eliminating daily overdue fines and processing fees as an important step forward in promoting equity and removing barriers for all residents. The charging of daily overdue fines and processing fees were initially intended to act as an incentive to return materials on time; however, the imposition of fines and fees on overdue materials has created an unintended barrier for library use, especially for lower income community members (Attachment 3). Additionally, no change to the current rental rate of the Library Community Room (Madeline F. Whittlesey Room) is being recommended. The current rental rate will remain at $12.50 per hour.

February 15, 2022
 The Recreation facility rental fees for the various sites have been updated to more clearly display the current discounts given to both rentals to other City departments (discount of 50 percent) and non-profit rentals (discount of 25 percent). City Council will have the opportunity at upcoming meetings to discuss and provide direction to staff regarding potential fee waiver and fee reduction policies for use of City facilities and parks. These policies will provide a formal process for specific organizations to request the use of City facilities and parks at no cost (fee waiver) or reduced costs (fee reductions) based on the Master Fee Schedule approved rates. City staff is also researching the development and implementation of program partnership agreements between the City and outside entities which would facilitate the provision of important services and/or resources to the Richmond community.

 RMC Chapter 7.04.300 Certificates, as adopted through the approval of Measure U, includes a New Business Registration Fee. Staff is submitting a new fee to be charged to every person applying for a first business tax certificate for a newly established business.

 Per RMC Chapter 14.46 Parking Regulations, the transportation fees submitted reflect slight increases to the existing parking programs and new curb management permitting fees for emerging mobility services to improve program management cost recovery. The new mobility services that require transportation issued permits include curbside electric vehicle charging, car share, shuttle, bike share, and other micro mobility operations. These fees are an integral part of transportation demand management for parking and traffic congestion control.

 Staff is currently working with Willdan Financial in updating both Impact Fees and User Fees for various departments The scope of services provided under this program is designed to produce reports used in the updating of the Master Fee Schedule to help better capture city costs in providing city services and to offset the impacts of new development. The main departments to thoroughly review and update are Fire and Public Works.

NEXT STEPS:

City Staff will return on March 1, 2022, for the second and final reading of the ordinance adopting the new fees and adoption of the resolution amending the current fees.

Finance Staff will return in the next few months with updated fees that are currently being developed that will more accurately capture the cost of City services for the departments not included in this round. Additionally, staff will propose a Fee Waiver policy.

In addition, City Council will have the opportunity at upcoming meetings to discuss and provide direction to staff regarding program partnership agreements and potential fee waiver/ reduction policies for use of City facilities and parks.

February 15, 2022
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Ordinance
Attachment 2 – Revised Proposed Master Fee Schedule
Attachment 3 – Housing Fee Memo
Attachment 4 – Resolution

1 ORDINANCE NO. _____ - 22

AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND ESTABLISHING FEES IN

THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR SPECIFIED SERVICES RENDERED BY CITY DEPARTMENTS. THIS ORDINANCE AMENDS THE FEE SCHEDULE

WHICH WILL IMPLEMENT COST RECOVERY AND WILL SERVE AS THE BASIS FOR FUTURE FEE ADJUSTMENTS.

The City Council of the City of Richmond do ordain as follows:

SECTION 1. Section 2.34.040 of the City of Richmond Municipal Code is hereby amended to include the following fees within the various categories:

Description Percentage
of Costs
Proposed
Fees
RMC 6.38.110 Section 5 allows the City to collect fees solely to defray actual cost.

RMC 6.02.180

Richmond Community Development Department
Housing Division Fees/Portfolio Management
Subordination Processing Fee
Single Family/Condo/Townhouse 100% As Needed
Multi-Family (Developer) Property less than 10 years old 100% As Needed Multi-Family (Developer) Property 10+ years old 100% As Needed Redraw Fee (Revisions) Single Family/Condo/Townhouse 100% As Needed Redraw Fee (revisions) Multi-Family (Developer) 100% As Needed Demand Statement
Demand Statement 100% As Needed
Re-conveyance Fee
Property less than 10 years old 100% As Needed
Property 10+ years old 100% As Needed
Recording Fee
Recording Fee per property 100% As Needed
Notary Fee
Notary Fee per property 100% As Needed
Marina Shores Property Management
Subordination Processing Fee
Single Family/Condo/Townhouse 100% As Needed
Redraw Fee (Revisions) Single Family/Condo/Townhouse 100% As Needed Demand Statement
Demand Statement 100% As Needed
Re-conveyance Fee
Property less than 10 years old 100% As Needed

2 Property 10+ years old 100% As Needed
Other Fees
Fees by external department/agencies 100% As Needed
Legal Review Fees 100% As Needed
Fees by external department/agencies 100% As Needed
Legal Review Fees 100% As Needed
Richmond Finance Department
Business Tax Division
New Business Registration Fee 100% As Needed
Transportation - Parking Management Services
Shared Mobility Services
Dedicated Public Parking Stalls - Mobility Operators
Gas vehicles with dedicated parking public parking stalls 100% As Needed ZEV (zero emission vehicles) with dedicated public parking 100% As Needed Free Floating Car Share Vehicle Permits
Gas Vehicles (1 to 10 vehicles) 100% As Needed
Gas Vehicles (More than 10 vehicles) 100% As Needed
ZEV (1 to 10 vehicles) 100% As Needed
ZEV (More than 10 vehicles) 100% As Needed
Dedicated Car Share Vehicle Permits
Gas Vehicles - Operating from private property (1 to 10 vehicles) 100% As Needed
Gas Vehicles - Operating from private property (More than 10 vehicles) 100% As Needed
Gas vehicles - Parked/stored on public streets 100% As Needed ZEV (1 to 10 vehicles) 100% As Needed
ZEV (More than 10 vehicles) 100% As Needed
Bike Share/Scooter Providers (non grant funded)
Permit Application Fee (staff costs to review permit) 100% As Needed Annual Permit Fee 100% As Needed
Public Property Repair and Maintenance Endowment fee 100% As Needed Private Shuttle Providers
Permit to Operate
Gas Vehicles 100% As Needed
ZEV 100% As Needed
Special Event transportation 100% As Needed
Dedicated Right of Way loading zones 100% As Needed
On Street Metered (Paid) Parking
Public parking stalls 100% As Needed

3 SECTION 2. Commencing with the effective date of this or dinance, the fees established in Section 1, above shall be as follows, subject to adjustment in accordance with Richmond Municipal Code Section 13.45:

Description New Proposed
Fees
RMC 6.38.110 Section 5 allows the City to collect fees solely to defray actual cost.

Richmond Community Development Department
Housing Division Fees/Portfolio Management
Subordination Processing Fee
Single Family/Condo/Townhouse New 500.00
Multi-Family (Developer) Property less than 10 years old New 960.00 Multi-Family (Developer) Property 10+ years old New 1,260.00 Redraw Fee (Revisions) Single Family/Condo/Townhouse New 75.00 Redraw Fee (revisions) Multi-Family (Developer) New 225.00 Demand Statement
Demand Statement New 155.00
Re-conveyance Fee
Property less than 10 years old New 155.00
Property 10+ years old New 235.00
Recording Fee
Recording Fee per property
New
Per County
Recorder
Schedule
Notary Fee
Notary Fee per property New Fees set by
State
Marina Shores Property Management
Subordination Processing Fee
Single Family/Condo/Townhouse New 500.00
Redraw Fee (Revisions) Single Family/Condo/Townhouse New 75.00 Demand Statement
Demand Statement New 155.00
Re-conveyance Fee
Property less than 10 years old New 155.00
Property 10+ years old New 235.00
Other Fees
Fees by external department/agencies
New
Actual cost
as set by
external

4 dept/agency
Legal Review Fees

New
Actual cost
as set by
external
dept/agency
Richmond Finance Department
Business Tax Division
New Business Registration Fee New 25.00
Transportation - Parking Management Services
Shared Mobility Services
Dedicated Public Parking Stalls - Mobility Operators
Gas vehicles with dedicated parking public parking stalls New Determined
upon
application
based on
Actual Cost
ZEV (zero emission vehicles) with dedicated public parking New Determined
upon
application
based on
Actual Cost
Free Floating Car Share Vehicle Permits
Gas Vehicles (1 to 10 vehicles) New $174.00
Gas Vehicles (More than 10 vehicles) New $204.00
ZEV (1 to 10 vehicles) New $130.50
ZEV (More than 10 vehicles) New $153.00
Dedicated Car Share Vehicle Permits
Gas Vehicles - Operating from private property (1 to 10 vehicles) New $325.00 Gas Vehicles - Operating from private property (More than 10 vehicles) New $425.00
Gas vehicles - Parked/stored on public streets New
Parking Stall
Revenue
Calculations
applied
minus 25%
clean air
discount

5 ZEV (1 to 10 vehicles) New
Based on
calculations
related to
annual
revenue loss
from the
identified
space(s)
minus 25%
clean air
discount
ZEV (More than 10 vehicles) New
Based on
calculations
related to
annual
revenue loss
from the
identified
space(s)
minus 25%
clean air
discount
Bike Share/Scooter Providers (non grant funded)
Permit Application Fee (staff costs to review permit) New $1,536.00 Annual Permit Fee New $102.00
Public Property Repair and Maintenance Endowment fee New $2,500.00 Private Shuttle Providers
Permit to Operate
Gas Vehicles New $204.00
ZEV New $153.00
Special Event transportation New $102.00
Dedicated Right of Way loading zones New
Determined
upon
application
based on
Actual Cost
On Street Metered (Paid) Parking

6 Public parking stalls New
Determined
upon
application
based on
Actual Cost

SECTION 3. Pursuant to Section 2.34.040 of the Municipal Code of the City of Richmond which provides for the establishment of a Master Fee S chedule for the fee s to be charged by the various City departments for City services , City Council of the City of Richmond hereby enacts a Master Fee Schedule that updates the fees assessed by the City departments to reflect the actual cost associated with providing the serv ice. The Master Fee Schedule can be utilized as the basis for the future fee adjustments based on the Employment Cost Index.

SECTION 4. Severability. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is f or any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. The Cit y Council hereby declares th at it would have passed each and every section, subsection, phrase or clause of this ordinance irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections , phrases or clauses be declared invalid or unconstitutional, whether on its face or as applied.

SECTION 5. This ordinance shall be effective 30 days after pass age and adoption with the exception of A.B. 1600 Developer impact fees which will become effective sixty days after the adoption of this ordinance.

*****************************
First introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Richmond held on February 15. 2022, and finally passed and adopted at a re gular meeting held on March 1, 2022, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

_____________________________________
Clerk of the City of Richmond

7 (SEAL)

Approved:

_______________________________
Mayor

Approved as to form:

____________________________
City Attorney

Building Regulatns, Impact Fees
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Developer Impact Fees
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

Residential, single-family development, per
dwelling unit (DU), allocated as follows: 16,804.00 17,670.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 15.08.400-2, RMC

15.08.400-8, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
- Park/open space 6,609.00 1.052 6,950.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Sewer 3,447.00 1.052 3,625.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Traffic 1,872.00 1.052 1,968.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Community/aquatic centers 1,585.00 1.052 1,667.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Storm Drainage 675.00 1.052 710.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Library 1,791.00 1.052 1,883.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Police facilities 372.00 1.052 391.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Fire facilities 453.00 1.052 476.00 Residential, multi-family development, per
dwelling unit (DU), allocated as follows:
13,540.00 14,238.00
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Park/open space 5,427.00 1.052 5,707.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Sewer 2,790.00 1.052 2,934.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Traffic 1,496.00 1.052 1,573.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Community/aquatic centers 1,301.00 1.052 1,368.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Storm Drainage 367.00 1.052 386.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Library 1,791.00 1.052 1,883.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Police facilities 198.00 1.052 208.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Fire facilities 170.00 1.052 179.00 Commercial development, per 1,000 square
feet, allocated as follows:
9,507.00 9,997.00
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Park/open space - 1.052 - 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Sewer 3,143.00 1.052 3,305.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Traffic 4,648.00 1.052 4,888.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Community/aquatic centers - 1.052 - 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Storm Drainage 940.00 1.052 988.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Library 239.00 1.052 251.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Police facilities 286.00 1.052 301.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Fire facilities 251.00 1.052 264.00 ECI
Factor
ECI Index for
proposed
increase

DEVELOPER FEES
RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 Description
Public Facility Impact Fees (The fees pay for major infrastructure improvements in each area required as a result of new development, for example off-site roads, traffic signals, fire and police facilities and park and recreation facilities.) Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
ECI Index for
last increase
Master Fee Schedule
1

Building Regulatns, Impact Fees
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Developer Impact Fees
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

ECI
Factor
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 Description
Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
ECI Index for
last increase
Office development, per 1,000 square feet,
allocated as follows: 7,946.00 8,355.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Park/open space - 1.052 - 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Sewer 2,205.00 1.052 2,319.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Traffic 4,101.00 1.052 4,312.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Community/aquatic centers - 1.052 - 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Storm Drainage 706.00 1.052 742.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Library 397.00 1.052 417.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Police facilities 286.00 1.052 301.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Fire facilities 251.00 1.052 264.00 Industrial development, per 1,000 square feet,
allocated as follows: 3,788.00 3,984.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Park/open space - 1.052 - 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Sewer 1,086.00 1.052 1,142.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Traffic 1,498.00 1.052 1,575.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Community/aquatic centers - 1.052 - 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Storm Drainage 749.00 1.052 788.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Library 169.00 1.052 178.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Police facilities 108.00 1.052 114.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Fire facilities 178.00 1.052 187.00 Warehousing space, per 1,000 square feet,
allocated as follows: 3,670.00 3,860.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Park/open space - 1.052 - 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Sewer 1,086.00 1.052 1,142.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Traffic 1,498.00 1.052 1,575.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Community/aquatic centers - 1.052 - 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Storm Drainage 749.00 1.052 788.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Library 51.00 1.052 54.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Police facilities 108.00 1.052 114.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 - Fire facilities 178.00 1.052 187.00 Mitigation Administrative Fee
Not applicable N/A Not applicable N/A N/A
Section 66000 CA Govt Code;
Reso. 6-04; RMC 2.34.040, Ord.
3-04
Mitigation Administrative Fee -- 3% of the total
project impact fees (for Building Regulations
included in Impact Fees administered by Finance) 3.0% N/A 3.0%

INCLUSIONARY HOUSING IN-LIEU FEES
Inclusionary Housing Fees
Master Fee Schedule
2

Building Regulatns, Impact Fees
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Developer Impact Fees
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

ECI
Factor
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 Description
Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
ECI Index for
last increase

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 In Lieu Fees -- per non-inclusionary unit (unit is a dwelling, live/work or multi-family unit)
7% of cost of construction of
habitable space N/A
7% of cost of construction of
habitable space
Type of Project

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Rental Residential Development N/A N/A $12 per square foot

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Ownership Residential Development N/A N/A May not pay in-lieu fee

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 0 - 370 N/A N/A -

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 371 - 74 N/A N/A 3.00

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 742 - 1,111 N/A N/A 6.00

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 1,112 - 1,482 N/A N/A 9.00

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 More than 1,482 N/A N/A 12.00 Park Land Dedication Fees Calculated on a Per Unit Basis

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040,
Ord. 3-04 Single Family dwelling unit, detached or
townhouse, fee per unit 432.00 N/A 432.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040,
Ord. 3-04 Duplex, medium low 372.00 N/A 372.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040,
Ord. 3-04 Condominiums and Clusters 300.00 N/A 300.00 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040,
Ord. 3-04 Apartments (7 units or more) 216.00 N/A 216.00 Other Mandated Building Permit Fees
STMP, CBSC and SMIP FEES are collected by,
but not set by the City
Subregional Transportation Mitigation Program (STMP) Fees 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Single family residential, fee per dwelling unit 5,744.00 1.023 5,881.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Multi-family Residential, fee per dwelling unit 2,829.00 1.023 2,897.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Senior Housing, fee per dwelling unit 1,551.00 1.023 1,588.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Commercial hotel per room 3,676.00 1.023 3,764.00 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS PROPOSED SOUTH OF I-580 AND ON THE POINT SAN

PABLO PENINSULA

OTHER RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS
Building Permits for Number of Residential Units Issued after the Resolution's Effective Date
Applicable Fee per Square Foot of Net
New Residential Floor Area
Master Fee Schedule
3

Building Regulatns, Impact Fees
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Developer Impact Fees
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

ECI
Factor
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 Description
Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
ECI Index for
last increase
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Commercial Retail, fee per square feet 6.96 1.023 7.13 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Office, fee per square feet 9.21 1.023 9.43 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Industrial, fee per square feet 5.87 1.023 6.01 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Mini Storage Space, fee per square fee 0.80 1.023 0.82 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Other Fee per dwelling unit (Per AM pk hr trip) 7,762.00 1.023 x` California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) Fees

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 $1 - 25,000 Permit Valuation 1.00 N/A 1.00

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 $25,001 - 50,000 2.00 N/A 2.00

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 $50,000 - 75,000 3.00 N/A 3.00

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 $75,000 - 100 000 4.00 N/A 4.00

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Every $25,000 or fraction thereof above $100,000 Add $1 N/A Add $1 Strong-Motion Instrumentation & Seismic Hazard Mapping Fees

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 1 to 3 story Residential .00013 * Project Valuation Min Fee $.50 N/A .00013 * Project Valuation
Min Fee $.50

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Commercial and over 3 story Residential .00028 * Project Valuation Min Fee $.50 N/A .00028 * Project Valuation
Min Fee $.50
Public Art Fee

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 All new commercial structures; all new industrial structures; all new residential projects of ten or
more dwelling units; and all construction of
building additions, and/or renovations and/or
tenant improvements exceeding $500,000.00 in
building development costs shall contribute an
amount equal to one percent of the total
development cost to be set aside for public art.
1% of Building
Development Cost N/A 1% of Building
Development Cost

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.12.050, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 All City capital improvement projects, including all City bond measure projects and all other City
capital projects funded from outside granting
authorities, shall contribute an amount equal to
one and one-half percent of the total development
costs of the City capital improvement project, to
be set aside for public art.

1.5% of Building
D
evelopment Cost N/A 1.5% of Building
Development Cost
Master Fee Schedule
4

Building Regulatns, Impact Fees
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Developer Impact Fees
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

ECI
Factor
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 Description
Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
ECI Index for
last increase
Note: for detail Building Development Cost - Refer to Chapter 6.50 PUBLIC ART PROGRAM Master Fee Schedule
5

Building Regulatns, Misc. Fees
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Miscellaneous Fees

1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-1, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Registration Fee 87.00 1.023 89.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-2, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Initial Inspection Fee -- Per Unit 174.00 1.023 178.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-2, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
RRIP/Re-Inspection 74.00 1.023 76.00 Contra Costa County Drainage Area No. 73
Uknown N/A Not applicable N/A N/A
RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040,
Ord. 3-04 County’s Drainage Area No. 73 (El Sobrante
Valley) -- Varies based on lot size Varies N/A Varies Point Richmond Parking District Fee
Uknown N/A Not applicable N/A N/A
RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040,
Ord. 3-04 Applies to the Point Richmond downtown
commercial area (Public Works)--Varies based on
numerous factors
Varies N/A Varies
Code Compliance Inspection Fees
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 This fee is the same as the "Inspection and Notice" fee in the Code Enforcement portion of
the Master Fee Schedule
294.00 1.023 301.00
Uknown N/A Not applicable N/A N/A
RMC 12.52.060; RMC

2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Alquist Priolo Geological Study Filing Fee -- Cost (staff time billed at approximately $80 - $100/hour
and consultant time charged at actual cost) Cost N/A Cost UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220

MISCELLANEOUS
Buidling Regulations uses the Uniform Building Code (UBC) valuation schedules.

Refer to attached "Schedule of Fees for Permits" for a complete valuataion schedule.

Residential Rental Dwelling Unit Inspection and Maintenance Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
ECI Index for
last increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
ECI
Factor
Master Fee Schedule
6

Bldng Regulatns, Permits
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Permit Fees

BUILDING PERMIT FEES
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Filing 132.00 1.023 135.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Filing - Two or more permits - Minor Res.

Remodel / Improvement
185.00 1.023 189.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Filing - Two or more permits - Residential Additions and All Other
317.00 1.023 324.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Dupicate Permit Card 79.00 1.023 81.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
2nd time Permit Extension 158.00 1.023 162.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Change of Contractor 336.00 1.023 344.00 N/A 139.7 N/A 139.7 1.027
Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Permit Transfer
10%*Original Permt
including Plan Check N/A 10%*Original Permt
including Plan Check
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Certificate of Occupancy (requested separate from orig. permit)
108.00 1.023 110.00 N/A 139.7 N/A 139.7 1.028
Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Occupancy Program Fee
10%*Building Permit
Fees N/A 10%*Building Permit Fees
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Third Plan Checking Submittal(Response to Plan Check Comments)
368.00 1.023 376.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Change of Address-Min 2hrs 423.00 1.023 433.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Release of Record 167.00 1.023 171.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Expedited Plan Review Fee - Min 2hrs 1,105.00 1.023 1,130.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Property File/Plan Retrieval per Address 264.00 1.023 270.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Fax Permit per Address 148.00 1.023 151.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Technology Fee .1875* Project Valuation N/A .1875* Project Valuation 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Re-Inspection Fee Per Address 167.00 1.023 171.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Over-Time Inspection Min 2 hrs 915.00 1.023 936.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 3 plan check engineer hours on an approved fabricator application
1,105.00 1.023 1,130.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Fabricator application renewal Min 2hrs
737.00 1.023 754.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 3 hours on a new special inspection agency application
914.00 1.023 935.00 Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
ECI Index for
last increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
ECI
Factor
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 Master Fee Schedule
7

Bldng Regulatns, Permits
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Permit Fees
Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
ECI Index for
last increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
ECI
Factor
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 2 hours on a special inspection agency application renewal
610.00 1.023 624.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Sewer Connection Fee
2,950.00 1.023 3,018.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Plan check consultation fee-30 minutes
minimum (Non-refundable/non-transferable)
185.00 1.023 189.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
BP - $0 - $3000 154.00 1.023 158.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
BP - $3001 - $25,000 288.00 1.023 295.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
BP - $25,001 - $50,000 942.00 1.023 964.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
BP - $50,001 - $100,000 1,443.00 1.023 1,476.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
BP - $100,001 - $500,000 2,854.00 1.023 2,920.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
BP - $500,000 - $1,000,000 7,592.00 1.023 7,767.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
BP - >$1,000,001
$11,353 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $5.00 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.

1.023
$11,614 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $5.00 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Business License Inspection 109.00 1.023 112.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Code Compliance Permit and Inspection 505.00 1.023 517.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Investigation Fee for Work Done Without Permits (in addition to the permit fee)
3 times the permit
fee New 3 times the permit fee
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Solar Structure - Residential System 450.00 1.023 450.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Solar Structure - Commercial System 2,057.00 1.023 Deleted 1-Jul-20 143.6 1-Jul-21 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Photovoltaic systems up to 50kW 1,000.00 NA 1,000.00 1-Jul-20 143.6 1-Jul-21 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
1,000.00 NA 1,000.00
1-Jul-20 143.6 1-Jul-21 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
7 NA 7
Photovoltaic systems between 51 kW and 250 kW:
1000.00 for first 50kW +$7per kW for each kW
between 51 kW and 250 kW
Commercial Solar Energy System
Master Fee Schedule
8

Bldng Regulatns, Permits
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Permit Fees
Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
ECI Index for
last increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
ECI
Factor
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 1-Jul-20 143.6 1-Jul-21 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Photovoltaic systems above 250 kW: 1,000.00 NA 1,000.00 1-Jul-20 143.6 1-Jul-21 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
1,000.00 for first 50kW +$7 per kW for each kW
between 51 kW and 250 kW and +$5 per kW for each
kW above 250 kW

7.00 5.00 NA 7.00

5.00 1-Jul-20 143.6 1-Jul-21 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Thermal systems up to 30kWth 1,000.00 NA 1,000.00
1-Jul-20 143.6 1-Jul-21 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Thermal systems between 31 kWth and 260 kWth: 1,000.00 NA 1,000.00 1-Jul-20 143.6 1-Jul-21 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
1,000.00 for first 30kWth +$7 per kWth for each kWth
between 31kWth and 260 kWth 7 NA 7
1-Jul-20 143.6 1-Jul-21 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Thermal systems above 260 kWth: 1,000.00 NA 1,000.00
1-Jul-20 143.6 1-Jul-21 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
1,000.00 for first 30kWth +$7 per kWth for each kWth
between 31 kWth and 260 kWth and +$5 per kWth for
each kWth above 260 kWth

7.00 5.00 NA

7.00 5.00
Application Surcharges

NA NA NA NA NA
RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d Comprehensive Planning Fee (Surcharge on all Building Permit Applications)

0.1875 x Project
Valuation NA 0.1875 x Project Valuation

PLAN CHECKING FEES
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC 1&2 FAM - $0 - $3000 281.00 1.023 287.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC 1&2 FAM - $3001 - $25,000 633.00 1.023 648.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC 1&2 FAM - $25,001 - $50,000 1,030.00 1.023 1,054.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC 1&2 FAM - $50,001 - $100,000 1,553.00 1.023 1,589.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC 1&2 FAM - $100,001 - $500,000 2,683.00 1.023 2,745.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC 1&2 FAM - $500,000 - $1,000,000 4,127.00 1.023 4,222.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC 1&2 FAM - >$1,000,001
$7,374 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $5.00 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.

1.023
$7,543 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $5.00 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC ALL OTHER - $0 - $3000 292.00 1.023 299.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC ALL OTHER - $3001 - $25,000 426.00 1.023 436.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC ALL OTHER - $25,001 - $50,000 773.00 1.023 791.00 Master Fee Schedule
9

Bldng Regulatns, Permits
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Permit Fees
Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
ECI Index for
last increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
ECI
Factor
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC ALL OTHER - $50,001 - $100,000 1,306.00 1.023 1,336.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC ALL OTHER - $100,001 - $500,000 2,753.00 1.023 2,816.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC ALL OTHER - $500,000 - $1,000,000 4,898.00 1.023 5,011.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
PC ALL OTHER - >$1,000,001
$8,699 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $5.00 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.

1.023
$8,899 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $5.00 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 OTC Plan Check Revision per 30 minutes / Deferred Submittals
185.00 1.023 189.00 Grading Permit Plan Review Fee
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Complex Grading/Changes to Apprd Plans

COST N/A COST
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Grading Plan Review 0 to 50 CY 477.00 1.023 488.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Grading Plan Review 51 to 1000 CY 960.00 1.023 982.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Grading Plan Review 1001 to 10k CY 1,440.00 1.023 1,473.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Grading Plan Review 10,001 CY and Above
$2,397 for the first
10,001 CY plus $5.00 for
each additional 1000 CY
or fraction thereof.

1.023
$2,452 for the first 10,001 CY
plus $5.00 for each additional
1000 CY or fraction thereof.

Grading Inspection/Permit Fee
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Grading Inspection fee, fixed portion, $200 448.00 1.023 458.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Grading Inspection <= 50 cubic yards 503.00 1.023 515.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Grading Inspection >51 cubic yards < 100 cubic yards 517.00 1.023 529.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 500.00 1.023 512.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 19.00 1.023 19.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 670.00 1.023 685.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 15.00 1.023 15.00 Grading Insp >1001 cubic yards < 10,000 cubic
yards, + $15.00 per 1,000 cubic yards
Grading Insp >101 cubic yards < 1,000 cubic yards,
+$19.00 per 100 cubic yards above the
Master Fee Schedule
10

Bldng Regulatns, Permits
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Permit Fees
Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
ECI Index for
last increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
ECI
Factor
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 872.00 1.023 892.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 74.00 1.023 76.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Encroachment Agreement -- Private right of way fee (see Engineering section for "Encroachment
Agreement -- Public right of way fee")
915.00 1.023 936.00 N/A 139.7 N/A 139.7 1.028
Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Quarterly Fees (C.I.P.) VARIES N/A VARIES

ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - NEW CONST - $0 - $3000 33.00 1.023 34.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - NEW CONST - $3001 - $25,000 41.00 1.023 42.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - NEW CONST - $25,001 - $50,000 109.00 1.023 112.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - NEW CONST - $50,001 - $100,000 230.00 1.023 235.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - NEW CONST - $100,001 - $500,000 369.00 1.023 377.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - NEW CONST - $500,000 - $1,000,000 1,895.00 1.023 1,939.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - NEW CONST - >$1,000,001
$3,007 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.

1.023
$3,076 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - ALL OTHER - $0 - $3000 186.00 1.023 190.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - ALL OTHER - $3001 - $25,000 210.00 1.023 215.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - ALL OTHER - $25,001 - $50,000 344.00 1.023 352.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - ALL OTHER - $50,001 - $100,000 571.00 1.023 584.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - ALL OTHER - $100,001 - $500,000 786.00 1.023 804.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - ALL OTHER - $500,000 - $1,000,000 1,895.00 1.023 1,939.00 Grading Insp >10,001 cubic yards yards, + $76.00 per
10,000 cubic yards
Master Fee Schedule
11

Bldng Regulatns, Permits
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Permit Fees
Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
ECI Index for
last increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
ECI
Factor
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
E - ALL OTHER - >$1,000,001
$2,474 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.

1.023
$2,530 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.

PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - NEW CONST - $0 - $3000 33.00 1.023 34.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - NEW CONST - $3001 - $25,000 35.00 1.023 36.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - NEW CONST - $25,001 - $50,000 94.00 1.023 96.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - NEW CONST - $50,001 - $100,000 184.00 1.023 188.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - NEW CONST - $100,001 - $500,000 309.00 1.023 316.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - NEW CONST - $500,000 - $1,000,000 2,816.00 1.023 2,881.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - NEW CONST - >$1,000,001
$3,674 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.

1.023
$3,758 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - ALL OTHER - $0 - $3000 180.00 1.023 184.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - ALL OTHER - $3001 - $25,000 188.00 1.023 192.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - ALL OTHER - $25,001 - $50,000 276.00 1.023 282.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - ALL OTHER - $50,001 - $100,000 436.00 1.023 446.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - ALL OTHER - $100,001 - $500,000 600.00 1.023 614.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - ALL OTHER - $500,000 - $1,000,000 3,078.00 1.023 3,149.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
P - ALL OTHER - >$1,000,001
$4,010 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.

1.023
$4,102 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.

MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES
Master Fee Schedule
12

Bldng Regulatns, Permits
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Permit Fees
Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
ECI Index for
last increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
ECI
Factor
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - NEW CONST - $0 - $3000 15.00 1.023 15.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - NEW CONST - $3001 - $25,000 35.00 1.023 36.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - NEW CONST - $25,001 - $50,000 64.00 1.023 65.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - NEW CONST - $50,001 - $100,000 171.00 1.023 175.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - NEW CONST - $100,001 - $500,000 236.00 1.023 241.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - NEW CONST - $500,000 - $1,000,000
1,383.00 1.023 1,415.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - NEW CONST - >$1,000,001
$2,083 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.

1.023
$2,131 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - ALL OTHER - $0 - $3000 180.00 1.023 184.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - ALL OTHER - $3001 - $25,000 188.00 1.023 192.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - ALL OTHER - $25,001 - $50,000 257.00 1.023 263.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - ALL OTHER - $50,001 - $100,000 436.00 1.023 446.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - ALL OTHER - $100,001 - $500,000 639.00 1.023 654.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - ALL OTHER - $500,000 - $1,000,000 3,078.00 1.023 3,149.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
M - ALL OTHER - >$1,000,001
$4,792 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.

1.023
$4,902 for the first
$1,000,000 plus $2.50 for
each additional $1000 or
fraction thereof.

FULL COST RECOVERY HOURLY RATES
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Building Inspector 305.00 1.023 312.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Plan Check 368.00 1.023 376.00 Master Fee Schedule
13

Bldng Regulatns, Permits
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
BUILDING REGULATIONS -- Permit Fees
Last increase
implemented
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
ECI Index for
last increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
ECI
Factor
UBC Regulations used to factor fee amounts.

RMC 5.12.050, 5.12.070, 6.02.180, 6.36.080 and 12.44.220 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Permit Technician 205.00 1.023 210.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 Reso. 142-86, RMC 6.02.180;
RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Admin / Clerical 192.00 1.023 196.00 Refunds
Cancelled permits are eligible for an 80% refund, upon approval by the Building Official. 20% of the fee is retained to recover the estimated average costs of the City’s administrative and technical efforts required to initiate and facilitate the permitting process.

Plan Check Review fees are non-refundable.

Master Fee Schedule
14

Planning
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
PLANNING (Fee Legend: (D) = Deposit fee, (F) = Flat fee Hourly Rates
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Planning Division Hourly Rate 231.00 1.023 236.00 Environmental (CEQA) Review
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Preliminary CEQA Review (F) 206.00 1.023 211.00

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Negative Declaration/Mitigated Negative Declaration (City Administration of Contractor) (F) 30% of total contract cost N/A 30% of total contract cost

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Environmental Impact Report (City Administration of Contractor) (F) 30% of total contract cost N/A 30% of total contract cost

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Consultant Environmental Work (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $11,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$11,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Consultant Technical Studies (City Administration of Contractor) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $2,700 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$2,700

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Mitigation Monitoring - First year (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $13,700 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$13,700

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Mitigation Monitoring - each subsq year (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $11,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$11,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Mitigation Monitoring - Large Projects (City administration of Contractor) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $20,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$20,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Notice of Determination (Neg Dec & MND) (F) As Set by State N/A As Set by State

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Notice of Determination EIR (F) As Set by State N/A As Set by State

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d County Documentation Handling Fee (F) As Set by County N/A As Set by County Legislative Actions

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d General Plan Amendment or Zoning Amendment (each) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $13,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$13,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Specific Plan Amendment (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $13,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$13,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Development Agreements (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $14,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$14,000
Variance Review

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Variance - Residential (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $3,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$3,500

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Variance - Non-Residential (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $5,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$5,500
Letters
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Zoning Verification/Rebuild Letters (F) 464.00 1.023 475.00 Waiver Review

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d
Waiver Review (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $3,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$3,500
Subdivision Review
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for
last increase
Index Effective date for
proposed increase
ECI Index for
proposed increase
ECI
Factor
Municipal Code or Other
Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
Master Fee Schedule
15

Planning
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for
last increase
Index Effective date for
proposed increase
ECI Index for
proposed increase
ECI
Factor
Municipal Code or Other
Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Lot Line Adjustment or Parcel Merger (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $5,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$5,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Tentative Parcel Map (0 to 4 lots) (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $6,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$6,500

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Tentative Subdivision Map (5 to 25 lots) (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $7,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$7,500

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Tentative Subdivision Map (26 to 100 lots) (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $9,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$9,500

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Tentative Subdivision Map (101 to 200 lots) (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $14,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$14,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Tentative Subdivision Map (201+ lots) (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $18,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$18,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Preliminary Plan (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $4,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$4,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Certificate of Compliance (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $4,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$4,000
Zoning Compliance Review
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d
Accessory Dwelling Unit (attached/detached) (F) 1,159.00 1.023 1,186.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Accessory Dwelling Unit (conversion) (F) 926.00 1.023 947.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (F) 695.00 1.023 711.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Fence (F) 231.00 1.023 236.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Residential Fence (4 feet or less - Front) (F) 58.00 1.023 59.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Business License -Zoning Clearance (F)/HOP 58.00 1.023 59.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Sign-Change of Copy (F) 58.00 1.023 59.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d
Business License/Home Occupation Permit (F) 58.00 1.023 59.00 Historic Resource Review

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d
Certificate of Appropriateness - Minor (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $2,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$2,500

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d
Certificate of Appropriateness - Major (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $3,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$3,500

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d
Mills Act Contract (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $5,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$5,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d
Landmark Designation(D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $2,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$2,500
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Demolition Permit Review (F) 370.00 1.023 379.00 Use Permit Review
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Administrative Use Permit (F) 2,112.00 1.023 2,161.00

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Temporary Use Permit (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $1,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$1,500
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Conditional Use Permit - Wireless Facility (CUP Renewal & Minor modifications) (F) 5,789.00 1.023 5,922.00 Master Fee Schedule
16

Planning
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for
last increase
Index Effective date for
proposed increase
ECI Index for
proposed increase
ECI
Factor
Municipal Code or Other
Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Conditional Use Permit - Wireless Facility (New) (F) 8,105.00 1.023 8,291.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Conditional Use Permit - Small Cell Site Node (F) 5,789.00 N/A 4,948.75 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Conditional Use Permit - Eating Establishment w/ ABC License (Beer & Wine Only) (F) 2,112.00 1.023 2,161.00

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Conditional Use Permit - Eating Establishment w/ ABC License (Beer, Wine & Spirits) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $3,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$3,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Conditional Use Permit - All Other Uses (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $5,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$5,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Conditional Use Permit - Amendment (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $3,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$3,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Conditional Use Permit - Compliance Review (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $5,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$5,000
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Conditional Use Permit - Commercial Cannabis Activity (F) 6,335.00 1.023 6,481.00

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Revocation Review (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $5,000 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$5,000

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Note: additional fees, see Police - Cannabis Design Review (Residential Projects) - Over the Counter 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Design Review - Over the Counter - Accessory Structure (250 sf or less) (F) 347.00 1.023 355.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Design Review - Over the Counter - Small Addition (500 sf or less, under 15 ft height) (F) 579.00 1.023 592.00 Design Review (Residential Projects) - Minor/Administrative 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Residential Design Review - Administrative - Fence (over basic height) (F) 396.00 1.023 405.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Residential Design Review - Administrative - Medium Addition (501 - 1200 sf, under 15 ft
height) (F)
1,266.00 1.023 1,295.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Residential Design Review - Administrative - Single Family/Duplex (501 - 1200 sf, under 15 ft
height) (F)
2,376.00 1.023 2,431.00 Design Review (Residential Projects) - Major Design Review (Design Review Board)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Residential Design Review - Design Review Board - Accessory Structure (251 sf or more) (D) Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of $1,250 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$1,250

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Residential Design Review - Design Review Board - Medium Addition (501 - 1200 sf, over 15
ft height) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $1,650 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$1,650

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Residential Design Review - Design Review Board - Large addition (1200 sf or more) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $2,350 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$2,350

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Residential Design Review - Design Review Board - Single-family/Duplex (1200 sf or more)
(D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $4,400 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$4,400
Master Fee Schedule
17

Planning
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for
last increase
Index Effective date for
proposed increase
ECI Index for
proposed increase
ECI
Factor
Municipal Code or Other
Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Residential Design Review - Design Review Board - Multifamily (3-10 units) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $8,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$8,500

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Residential Design Review - Design Review Board - Multifamily (10-25 units) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $10,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$10,500

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Residential Design Review - Design Review Board - Multifamily (26-100 units) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $12,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$12,500

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Residential Design Review - Design Review Board - Multifamily (100+ units) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $15,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$15,500
Design Review (Commercial/Industrial Projects) - Over the Counter 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Over the Counter - Solar Panel Install (F) 464.00 1.023 475.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Over the Counter - Small Addition or Improvement (1000 sf
or less) (F)
926.00 1.023 947.00 Design Review (Commercial/Industrial Projects) - Minor Design Review (Administrative) 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Alteration or addition (<30% of existing floor area) (F) 2,779.00 1.023 2,843.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Small New Construction (2000 sf or less) (F) 3,705.00 1.023 3,790.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Temporary Structure(s) (F) 4,631.00 1.023 4,738.00 Design Review (Commercial/Industrial Projects) - Major Design Review (Design Review Board)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Design Review Board - Medium Addition or improvement (2,001
sf -4,999 sf) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $6,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$6,500

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Design Review Board - Large Addition or Improvement (5,000 sf
or more) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $8,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$8,500

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Design Review Board - Large New Construction (5,001 sf or
more) (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $10,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$10,500
Sign Permits

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Administrative - Master Sign Program (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $3,500 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$3,500

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Design Review Board-Sign Variance (D)
Actual Cost - Initial Deposit
of $1,650 N/A Actual Cost - Initial Deposit of
$1,650
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Administrative - Window, Blade or Awning Sign (F) 369.00 1.023 377.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Administrative - Wall Sign (F) 369.00 1.023 377.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Administrative - Free Standing Sign (F) 2,376.00 1.023 2,431.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Non-residential Design Review - Administrative - Multiple Temporary Sign (F) 264.00 1.023 270.00 Appeals
Master Fee Schedule
18

Planning
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for
last increase
Index Effective date for
proposed increase
ECI Index for
proposed increase
ECI
Factor
Municipal Code or Other
Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Appeals - ZA (F)
$350 or $150 if appealed by
the corresponding
Neighborhood Council
N/A
$350 or $150 if appealed by the
corresponding Neighborhood
Council

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Appeals - DRB (F)
$350 or $150 if appealed by
the corresponding
Neighborhood Council
N/A
$350 or $150 if appealed by the
corresponding Neighborhood
Council

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Appeals - PC (F)
$500 or $150 if appealed by
the corresponding
Neighborhood Council
N/A
$500 or $150 if appealed by the
corresponding Neighborhood
Council
Other Requests
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Off site Plan / File Retrieval (F) 54.00 1.023 55.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Administrative Permit Time Extension (F) 1,157.00 1.023 1,184.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Photocopying, per page (F) 0.10 1.023 0.10 Planning Documents, documents denoted by an asterisk are also available online, free of charge,
on the Planning Department's website
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d * Zoning Ordinance (F) 52.00 1.023 53.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d * General Plan 2030 105.00 1.023 107.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d * Pedestrian Master Plan 30.00 1.023 31.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d * Bicycle Master Plan 30.00 1.023 31.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d * City Center Specific Plan (F) 30.00 1.023 31.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d * Richmond Bay Specific Plan (F) 40.00 1.023 41.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d * Tiscornia Estates Specific Plan (F) 30.00 1.023 31.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d * North Shoreline Specific Plan (F) 30.00 1.023 31.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Form-based Code 30.00 1.023 31.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Other Requests - Zoning Map 28.00 1.023 29.00 Engineering Improvement Plan Review - City Planning Administrative Fee 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $0 - $3,000 (F) 464.00 1.023 475.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $3,001 - $25,000 (F) 926.00 1.023 947.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $25,001 - $50,000 (F) 1,852.00 1.023 1,895.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $50,001 - $100,000 (F) 2,547.00 1.023 2,606.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $100,001 - $500,000 (F) 3,474.00 1.023 3,554.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $500,001 - $1,000,000 (F) 5,326.00 1.023 5,448.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $1,000,001 - $5,000,000 (F) 6,947.00 1.023 7,107.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $5,000,001 - $10,000,000 (F) 8,336.00 1.023 8,528.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $10,000,001 - $20,000,000 (F) 10,421.00 1.023 10,661.00 Note: Fee is for Planning's facilitation of non-
structural Engineering projects. Fee is based on
the value of non-structural engineering
improvements. Contractor expenses will be
passed through on top of the administrative fee.

Landscape Plan Check - City Planning Administrative Fee 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $0 - $3,000 (F) 464.00 1.023 475.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $3,001 - $25,000 (F) 926.00 1.023 947.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $25,001 - $50,000 (F) 1,390.00 1.023 1,422.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $50,001 - $100,000 (F) 1,852.00 1.023 1,895.00 Master Fee Schedule
19

Planning
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for
last increase
Index Effective date for
proposed increase
ECI Index for
proposed increase
ECI
Factor
Municipal Code or Other
Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $100,001 - $500,000 (F) 2,779.00 1.023 2,843.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $500,001 - $1,000,000 (F) 3,705.00 1.023 3,790.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $1,000,001 - $5,000,000 (F) 4,631.00 1.023 4,738.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $5,000,001 - $10,000,000 (F) 5,789.00 1.023 5,922.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d $10,000,001 - $20,000,000 (F) 6,947.00 1.023 7,107.00 Note: Fee is for Planning's facilitation of
Landscape Plan Check. Fee is based on value of
landscape improvements. Contractor expenses
will be passed through on top of the
administrative fee.

Subdivisions - Parcel and Tentative Maps
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Engineering Review - Parcel Map (0-5 lots) (F) 1,852.00 1.023 1,895.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Engineering Review - Final Map (6-25 lots) (F) 4,169.00 1.023 4,265.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Engineering Review - Final Map (26-100 lots) (F) 5,789.00 1.023 5,922.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC 2.34.040.32d Engineering Review - Final Map (101+ lots) (F) 9,263.00 1.023 9,476.00

FINAL MAP & IMPROVEMENT PLAN REVIEW & INSPECTION
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A RMC 2.34.040-39, RMC 15.08.480-5,
RMC 6.02.180, EO 90-039
- Per Major Subdivision Review, 5 or more
parcels, (Deposit)

2.5% of construction cost or $8,000, whichever is
greater

2.5% of bond est. for imp,
$8485 min
N/A 2.5% of bond est. for imp,
$8485 min
N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A RMC 2.34.040-39, RMC 15.08.480-5,
RMC 6.02.180, EO 90-039
- Per Minor Subdivision Review, 4 or fewer
parcels, (Deposit)

2.5% of construction cost or $6,000, whichever is
greater

2.5% of bond est. for imp,
$6498 min
N/A 2.5% of bond est. for imp,
$6498 min
New lot fee

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
New lot fee, actual cost of County fee ($50 as of 1
July 2007) 50.00 N/A 50.00 Final Subdivision Inspection Fee (Deposit)

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.08.420-2e - Per Major Subdivision Review, 5 or more parcels, (Deposit)
3% of construction cost or $7,000, whichever is
greater
3% of bond est. for imp,
$7580 min
N/A 3% of bond est. for imp, $7580
min

N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
RMC 15.08.420-2e - Per Minor Subdivision Review, 4 or fewer parcels, (Deposit)
3% of construction cost or $3,000, whichever is
greater
3% of bond est. for imp,
$3249 min
N/A 3% of bond est. for imp, $3249
min
Final Subdivision Map and Improvement Plan Review Fee (Deposit) Plan review services are provided on an actual cost basis. Refund of balance will be made after project acceptance; additional charges may also apply.

Master Fee Schedule
20

Housing Division
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE
Richmond Community Development Department

1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-1, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Single Family/Condo/Townhouse N/A New 500.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-2, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Multi-Family (Developer) Property less than 10
years old N/A New 960.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-2, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Multi-Family (Developer) Property 10+ years old N/A New 1,260.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-2, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Redraw Fee (Revisions) Single
Family/Condo/Townhouse N/A New 75.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-2, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Redraw Fee (revisions) Multi-Family (Developer) N/A New 225.00 Demand Statement
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-2, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Demand Statement N/A New 155.00 Re-conveyance Fee
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-2, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Property less than 10 years old N/A New 155.00 Uknown N/A Not applicable N/A N/A RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Property 10+ years old N/A New 235.00 Recording Fee
Uknown N/A Not applicable N/A N/A RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Recording Fee per property N/A New Per County Recorder Schedule Notary Fee
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Notary Fee per property N/A New Fees set by State Subordination Processing Fee
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-1, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Single Family/Condo/Townhouse N/A New 500.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-2, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Redraw Fee (Revisions) Single
Family/Condo/Townhouse N/A New 75.00 Demand Statement
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-2, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Demand Statement N/A New 155.00 Re-conveyance Fee
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.40.170-2, RMC

2.34.040-42c, RMC 6.02.180,
Reso. 142-86
Property less than 10 years old N/A New 155.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 6.02.180; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04
Property 10+ years old N/A New 235.00 Other Fees
Fees by external department/agencies N/A actual
cost
Actual cost as set by external
dept/agency
Legal Review Fees N/A actual
cost
Actual cost as set by external
dept/agency
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for
last increase
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
ECI
Factor
Municipal Code or
Other Code
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
Housing Division Fees/Portfolio Management
Subordination Processing Fee
Marina Shores Property Management
Master Fee Schedule
21

Cannabis Fees
CURRENT FEE Factor PROPOSED FEE

CANNABIS FEES
1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d Conditional Use Permit - Commercial Cannabis Activity (F) 6,335.00 1.023 6,481.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11
Application Completeness Review - Per Application 831.00 1.023 850.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Complete Application Review -Per Application 15,138.00 1.023 15,486.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Cannabis Business Permit - (Annually) 2,553.00 1.023 2,612.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Competitive Selection Process - Per Application 4,706.00 1.023 4,814.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Annual Regulation and Inspection/Per Quarter See Fee Below N/A See Fee Below 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Retail (Storefront & Non-Storefront) - Per Permit Annually, See Note 2 below 21,127.00 1.023 21,613.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11
Distribution - Per Permit Annually, See Note 2 below 21,127.00 1.023 21,613.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Manufacturing - Per Permit Annually, See Note 2 below 24,309.00 1.023 24,868.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Cultivation (up to 5,000 sqft) - Per Permit Annually, See Note 2 below 24,309.00 1.023 24,868.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Cultivation (5,001 to 10,000 sqft) - Per Permit Annually, See Note 2 below 25,900.00 1.023 26,496.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Cultivation (10,001 to 22,000 sqft) - Per Permit Annually, See Note 2 below 27,490.00 1.023 28,122.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Cultivation (22,001 sqft and up) - Per Permit Annually, See Note 2 below 30,672.00 1.023 31,377.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Nursery - Per Permit Annually - Per Permit Annually, See Note 2 below 22,718.00 1.023 23,241.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Testing - Per Permit Annually, See Note 2 below 24,309.00 1.023 24,868.00 1-Jul-2020 143.6 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.023 RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 09-11 Reinspection Fee - Per Inspection 1,193.00 1.023 1,220.00 Notes:
1 - Proposed fees are rounded to the nearest dollar
2 - Each additional permit for the same business at the same location shall be charged 50% of the applicable fee. The highest activity use fee shall be the first base fee.

Cost Index (Bureau of Labor Statistics)
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for
last increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase ECI Factor
Municipal Code or
Other Code
Master Fee Schedule
22

City Clerk_Attorney_Manager
Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE

CITY ATTORNEY
Not applicable N/A Not applicable N/A N/A
COR1/40907, RMC 2.40.110,
RMC 2.34.040.32d Photocopying, per page (8-1/2" x 11") 0.10 N/A 0.10

CITY CLERK
1-Oct-2006 N/A Not applicable N/A N/A RMC 2.34.040.32a, Ord. 2-03, E.O. 03-03 Appeal Filing Fees -- appeal a decision to a City Board 150.00 N/A 150.00 Not applicable N/A Not applicable N/A N/A RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d Photocopying, per page (8-1/2" x 11") 0.10 N/A 0.10 1-Oct-2006 N/A Not applicable N/A N/A RMC 1.04.070, Reso. 6-04; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Richmond Municipal Code Full Copy 250.00 N/A 250.00 1-Oct-2006 N/A Not applicable N/A N/A RMC 1.04.070, Reso. 6-04; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Richmond Municipal Code Supplements 40.00 N/A 40.00

CITY MANAGER
Not applicable N/A Not applicable N/A N/A
COR1/40907, RMC 2.40.110,
RMC 2.34.040.32d Photocopying, per page (8-1/2" x 11") 0.10 N/A 0.10 ECI Index for
last increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
ECI
Factor
Last increase
implemented
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Municipal Code or
Other Code
Master Fee Schedule
23

Code Enforcement
Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE

INFRASTRUCTURE & MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS

CODE ENFORCEMENT
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.34.040.43a, Ord. 2-03,
RMC 6.40.170, 9.48.080,

9.50, 11.76, 11.78, E.O. 03-04
Inspection and Notice
286.00 1.052 301.00
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.34.040.43c, Ord. 2-03, E.O. 03-04 Inspection Warrant 417.00 1.052 439.00 Not applicable N/A Not applicable N/A N/A
RMC 2.34.040.43d, Ord. 2-03,
E.O. 03-04 Appeal to Hearing Officer COST OF

CITATION N/A COST OF CITATION
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 Appeal to Public Safety Committee or Council 534.00 1.052 562.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.34.040.43f, Ord. 2-03,
E.O. 03-04, RMC 11.76.060 Administrative fee for site clean-up 195.00 1.052 205.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.34.040.43f, Ord. 2-03,
E.O. 03-04, RMC 11.76.060 Administrative fee for board up 195.00 1.052 205.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.34.040.43e, Ord. 2-03, E.O. 03-04 Re-Inspection 91.00 1.052 96.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.34.040.43g, Ord. 2-03, E.O. 03-04 Abatement Warrant 187.00 1.052 197.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 E.O. 03-04; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Lien and Special Assessment 239.00 1.052 251.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 E.O. 03-04; RMC 2.34.040, Ord. 3-04 Release of Recordation Processing Fee 166.00 1.052 175.00 Vacant Dwellings or Buildings
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.38.115 Vacant Property Registration 166.00 1.052 175.00 Not applicable N/A Not applicable N/A N/A
RMC 2.34.040.43i, Ord. 2-03,
RMC 6.38.100-E, E.O. 03-04 Permit to secure the building, calculated based on building valuation and square footage Calculate based
on valuation
N/A Calculate based on
valuation
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 6.38.115 Per month fee to cover the staff time and cost to monitor our chronically vacant property inventory 81.00 1.052 85.00 City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for
last increase
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
ECI
Factor
Municipal Code or
Other Code
Master Fee Schedule
24

Employment & Training
Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE

EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING
Not applicable N/A Not applicable N/A N/A
Reso. 6-04; RMC 2.34.040,
Ord. 3-04 1700 EZ Hiring Tax Credit Voucher--Per
voucher/verification ($15 goes to the State) 90.00 N/A 90.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 Reso. 6-04; RMC 2.34.040,
Ord. 3-04 1700 EZ Hiring Tax Credit Voucher Expediting
Fee 24.00 1.052 25.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 Reso. 6-04; RMC 2.34.040,
Ord. 3-04 1700 EZ Hiring Tax Credit Voucher Look-Up Fee 28.00 1.052 29.00

VOUCHER PROGRAM
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Description
ECI
Factor
Index Effective
date for
proposed
increase
Last increase
implemented
Municipal Code or
Other Code
ECI Index for
last increase
ECI Index for
proposed
increase
Master Fee Schedule
25

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
MVI

PREVENTION SERVICES DIVISION
SECTION I – OCCUPANCY

GROUP AERIAL PRE-PLAN FEES FOR SPECIFIC OCCUPANCIES
A one (1) time fee is based on size of occupancy.

Aerial Pre-Plan:
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 APP – 1 Small (elementary school size or smaller) 714.00 1.052 751.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
APP – 2 Medium (middle school size or smaller) 825.00 1.052 868.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
APP – 3 Larger (high school size or smaller) 935.00 1.052 983.00 APP - 4 Extra Large (cost will vary depending on overall size) General Aerial preplans shall comply with the following requirements:

Please review section RMC 8.16.040 Fire Prevention Code & Section 404 of CFC (California Fire Code) for complete requirements.

Where Required Occupancies:

1. Group A (Assembly) - An aerial pre-plan is required for assembly occupancies having an occupant load of 300 or more and larger than 5,000 square feet. If occupancy is attached to commercial complex larger than 10,000 square feet than an aerial pre-plan is required.

Exception: Other than Group A occupancy used exclusively for the purpose of religious worship having an occupant load less than 2,000

1. Group B (Business) – Occupant load of 500 or more persons

2. Group E (Educational) – Schools

3. Group F (Factory) – Occupant load of 500 or more persons

4. Group H (High Hazards) – Including any facility in the Contra Costa Health Services Hazardous Material Program

5. Group I (Institutional) – Hospitals, nursing homes, Jails, etc…)

6. Group R – 1, Hotels & motels (transient) – 20 or more sleeping units

7. Group R – 2, Apartments, hotels & motels (non-transient), Live/work units

8. Group R – 4, Licensed Care Facilities (referrer to

9. High-rise buildings

10. Group M (mercantile) buildings i.e. Department stores, markets, retail or wholesales stores having an occupant load of 500 or more person

11. Covered malls exceeding 50,000 square feet

12. Open malls exceeding 50,000 square feet

13. Underground buildings

14. Buildings with atrium and having an occupancy in Group A, E or M Aerial pre-plans shall include but not be limited to the following:

1. Knox Box location

2. Fire Alarm Control Panel (FACP)

3. Emergency vehicle access

4. Post Indicator Valve (PIV)

5. OS&Y valve

6. Location of hazardous Materials

7. Sprinkler riser

8. Gas Valve

9. Electrical main valve

10. Fire Department Connection (FDC)
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Master Fee Schedule
26

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule

11. Hydrant location

12. Elevator equipment room
SECTION I – OCCUPANCY
GROUP LICENSED CARE FACILITIES – 24 HOUR
***Occupant Load Greater than six (6) - up to six (6) Nonambulatory*** ***Occupant Load less than seven (7)***
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 LCF – 1 Base Fee: 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
LCF – 2 Plus each additional unit/occupant 5.00 1.052 5.00 Infant-care facility for children 2 ½ years of age and younger 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
LCF – 3 Base Fee: 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
LCF – 4 Plus each additional unit/occupant 5.00 1.052 5.00 (a) Permit to operate a licensed care facility such as: Rehabilitation facility, Assisted Living, Halfway Houses, Community Correction Centers, Re-entry Centers, Treatment Programs, Work Furlough, Alcoholism or Drug Abuse Recover and/or Treatment Facility, Congregate Living Health Facility, Group Homes, Immediate Care Facility, Infant Care Facilities, Residential Care Facilities (RCF’s), and Residential Care Facility for the Elderly (RCFE’s).

GROUP LICENSED CARE FACILITIES – LESS 24 HOUR
***OCCUPANT LOAD GREATER THAN SIX (6) OR MORE ***
Adult or Day Care Facility (Nonambulatory Person)
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 LCF – 5 Base Fee: 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
LCF – 6 Plus per unit/occupant 5.00 1.052 5.00 Adult or Child Large Family Day Care
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
LCF – 7 Base Fee: 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
LCF – 8 Plus per unit/occupant 5.00 1.052 5.00 Adult or Child Day Care Center
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
LCF – 9 Base Fee: 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
LCF – 10 Plus per unit/occupant 5.00 1.052 5.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
LCF – 11 Licensed Clinic 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
LCF – 12 Pre – Inspection Fees – 850 Form 251.00 1.052 264.00 (a) Permit to operate a licensed care facility such as: Adult Day Care, Adult Day Support Center, Child Day Care, Infant Day Care, and Large Family Day Care Home.

Non-ambulatory Persons – Persons unable to leave a building unassisted under emergency conditions. It includes, but is not limited to, persons who depend on mechanical aids such as crutches, walkers and wheelchairs and any person who is unable to physically and mentally respond to a sensory signal approved by the State Fire Marshall or an oral instruction relating to fire danger.

Master Fee Schedule
27

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
The determination of ambulatory or non-ambulatory status of persons with developmental disabilities shall be made by the Director of Social Services or his or her designated representative, in consultation with the Director of Developmental Services or his or her designated representative. The determination of ambulatory or non-ambulatory status of all other disabled persons placed after January 1, 1984, who are not developmentally disabled, shall be made by the Director of Social Services or his or her designated representative.

SECTION I – OCCUPANCY

GROUP EDUCATIONAL (PRIVATE SCHOOL) OCCUPANCY
To operate and maintain a school
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 EDU – 1 Occupant load less than 50 312.00 1.052 328.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
EDU – 2 Occupant load 50-149 438.00 1.052 461.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
EDU – 3 Occupant load 150-499 519.00 1.052 546.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
EDU – 4 Occupant load 500 or more 624.00 1.052 656.00

GROUP INSTITUTIONAL OCCUPANCIES
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
INS – 1 HOSPITAL (medical, surgical & psychiatric) and Nursing Homes 501.00 1.052 527.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
INS – 1.1 Plus $5.00 per patient/bed 5.00 1.052 5.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
INS – 2 Out Patient Clinics greater than 5 patients 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
INS – 2.1 Plus $5.00 per patient/bed 5.00 1.052 5.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
Inspection of Police Services facilities (holding cells) & DOJ Review 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
INS – 3 (Includes the approval of Evacuation & Life Safety Procedures). 250.00 1.052 263.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
INS – 4 Inspection of adult and/or juvenile detention facilities 937.00 1.052 985.00

GROUP RESIDENTIAL OCCUPANCIES
HOTEL/MOTEL OR APARTMENT/CONDOMINIUM HOUSE:
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
RES – 1 *250 or more units 880.00 1.052 925.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
RES – 2 *100 249 units 529.00 1.052 556.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
RES – 3 *15 99 units 264.00 1.052 278.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
RES – 4 *6 14 units 216.00 1.052 227.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
RES – 5 *5 or Less units 118.00 1.052 124.00 *Fees applied per building
Residential Occupancies with 20 or more complexes will have the following:

1. An annual inspection

2. A mid-year review inspection

3. *One (1) fire safety training session (12:00 p.m. – 4: p.m. on a scheduled Saturday) i.e.
a. Fire extinguisher training
b. Smoke alarm & carbon monoxide education
Master Fee Schedule
28

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
c. Cooking in the home safety
d. E.D.I.T.H. (Exit Drills In The Home) Training
*Appointments for fire safety training session need to be made 30 days in advance.

SECTION I – OCCUPANCY

GROUP BUSINESS OCCUPANCIES
MULTI-BUSINESS OCCUPANCIES :
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 BUS – 1 35 or more Suites 433.00 1.052 455.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
BUS – 2 25 34 Suites 372.00 1.052 391.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
BUS – 3 15 24 Suites 310.00 1.052 326.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
BUS – 4 6 14 Suites 248.00 1.052 261.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
BUS – 5 5 or Less Suites 186.00 1.052 196.00

GROUP HIGH RISE
High Rise
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
HR – 1 To inspect a Hi-Rise building (State certification inspection) - Pre 1974 2,132.00 1.052 2,242.00 High Rise - - - 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
HR – 2 To inspect a Hi-Rise building (State certification inspection) - Post 1974 546.00 1.052 574.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
HR - 2.1 - ($ .005 per square foot) $ .005 sq. ft. $ .005 sq. ft.

Mid-Rise
To inspect and test life safety systems (i.e. smoke management) and where such systems are installed in lieu of fire department access or when required for the mitigation of other life safety issues or requirements.
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
HR – 3 Life safety system test 546.00 1.052 574.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
HR - 3.1 ($ .05 per square foot) $ .05 sq. ft. n/a $ .05 sq. ft.

Low-Rise – One to Two Floors(s)
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
MLB-3 To Inspect and test life safety systems (i.e. fire alarm, sprinkler, smoke control) with a minimum 4 hours inspection time (includes re-inspection) 979.00 1.052 1,029.00 GROUP REFINERY/BULK PLANT or TERMINAL/BULK TRANSFER/PROCESS TRANSFER REF/BULK Bulk Plant/Terminal Rate (Section III plan review, Section IV Permit to Operate 21.10 & 21 11) Permit to Operate a Bulk Plant or Terminal facility where flammable or combustible liquids are received by tank vessel, pipelines, tank car or tank vehicle and are stored or blended in bulk for the purpose of distributing such liquids by tank vessel, pipeline, tank car, tank vehicle, portable tank or container.

Bulk Transfer Rate (Section III Plan Review, Section IV Permit to Operate 21.12 & 21.13) Permit to Operate a Bulk Transfer facility where loading or unloading of flammable or combustible liquids from or between tank vehicles, tank cards or storage tanks.

Process Transfer Rate (Section III Plan Review, Section IV Permit to Operate 21.14 & 21.15) Permit to Operate a Process Transfer facility where the transfer of flammable or combustible liquids between tank vehicles or tank cars and process operations. Process operations may include containers, tanks, piping and equipment.

SECTION II –SPECIAL SERVICES
Master Fee Schedule
29

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule

GROUP SPECIAL SERVICE TASK
Callback, Third, and/or Additional Inspection:
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 SST - 1 Callback or Third (3rd) follow-up or subsequent inspection. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 1.1 Additional inspection time during normal business hours - $125.00 per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 1.2 Additional inspection time after normal business hours - $ 251.00 per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 1.3 Overtime and weekend inspections: Three-hour $ 753.00 minimum fee. 753.00 1.052 792.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 1.4 Fire Company Mercantile Inspection 123.00 1.052 129.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST - 1.5 Annual Commercial Warehouse Fire Inspection – Greater than 3,000 square feet. 244.00 1.052 257.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 2 Consultation: 1/2 hour minimum 125.00 1.052 131.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 3 Per hour 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 4 Copying: Per Page 0.20 1.052 0.20 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
False Alarms: Initial notice to correct any malfunctions with alarm system No Charge 1.052 No Charge 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 5 For 1st (within six-month period – Jan 1st – Jun 30th or Jul 1st – Dec 31st) 280.00 1.052 294.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 6 2nd – (within six-month period - Jan 1st – Jun 30th or Jul 1st – Dec 31st) 562.00 1.052 591.00 3rd – and/or each occurrence thereafter (within six-month period – 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 7 Jan 1st – Jun 30th or Jul 1st – Dec 31st) 1,124.00 1.052 1,182.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 8 Fire Hydrant Flow Test 501.00 1.052 527.00 Fire Protection System Signaling Service
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 9 Registration and 1st Year service fee 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 9.1 Annual Service Fee 44.00 1.052 46.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 10 High Rise Certification 3,258.00 1.052 3,426.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 11 Halon Concentration Test 501.00 1.052 527.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 12 Knox Box Service 42.00 1.052 44.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 13 Standby: Single person per hour 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST-13.1 Fire Engine Company per hour 753.00 1.052 792.00 Training/Instructional Services
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 14 Minimum instructional fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 Fees include two (2) hours of training/instruction during normal working hours.

Master Fee Schedule
30

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 SST - 14.1 Each additional hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 Fire File Review
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST – 15
To Gain access to any fire file to review including but not limited to the following; incident reports including California Fire Incident Report System, property history, inspection history, and facility system history.

29.00 1.052 30.00
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 SST – 16 Business License Inspection 125.00 1.052 131.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST - 17 Failure to obtain operational permit 548.00 1.052 576.00 Extended Period of Use
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
SST - 18 Permit to extend the use of a permit for an additional 180 days 251.00 1.052 264.00 SECTION III – PLAN REVIEW
GROUP PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW – CONSULTATIONS/MEETING
In office design review/preliminary plan consultation meetings. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 1 Per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Out of office design and/or consultation meetings.
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 1.2 ($ 251.00 Per hour two hour minimum) 501.00 1.052 527.00 Review of fire & life safety measures for building(s)
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR - 1.3 Fees include (1) hours plan review and one (1) site inspection. 501.00 1.052 527.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR - 21 Additional plan review time or inspection, per half hour 128.00 1.052 135.00 GROUP SUBDIVISION – PLAN REVIEW
Major Subdivision Plan Review (5 or More Lots/Parcels) (See PR 11.1) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 2 Review of subdivision for access, hydrant placement. 753.00 1.052 792.00 Fees include two (2) hours plan review and one (1) visual inspection. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 2.1 Each additional site inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Minor Subdivision Plan Review (1 to 4 Lots/Parcels) (See PR 11.1) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 2.2 Review of subdivision for access, hydrant placement. 376.00 1.052 395.00 Fees include ½ hour plan review and one (1) visual inspection. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 2.2.1 Each additional inspection. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Single Family Home Review – access & water supply
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 2.3 Review of plans for access and water supply. 376.00 1.052 395.00 Master Fee Schedule
31

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 PR – 2.3.1 Single Family Home Review –Tenant Improvement for additions and Modifications 251.00 1.052 264.00 Fees include ½ hour plan review and one (1) visual inspection. (Does not include review of fire sprinkler systems – see Sec PR 5.4) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 2.4 Each additional inspection. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 GROUP BUILDING CONSTRUCTION – NEW BUILDINGS & TENANT IMPROVEMENTS New Construction or Building Additions Plan Review (See PR 11.1) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 PR – 3 Minimum plan review base fee. 753.00 1.052 792.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 3.1 Plus $.08 per square foot in excess of 2,000 sq. ft. $ .08 sq. ft. $ .08 sq. ft.

Fee includes two (2) hours of plan review and one (1) field inspection. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 3.1.2 Additional inspections per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Tenant Improvement Plan Review (for building additions see PR 3.1) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 3.2 Minimum plan review base fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 3.2.1 Plus $.08 per square foot in excess of 2,000 sq. ft. $ .08 sq. ft. $ .08 sq. ft.

Fee includes one (1) hour plan review and one (1) field inspection. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 3.2.2 Additional inspections per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour 125.00 1.052 131.00 SECTION III – PLAN REVIEW
GROUP WATER SUPPLY – FIRE SERVICE MAINS – FIRE HYDRANTS Fire Service – Emergency Repair
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 4 Review of underground piping, placement, and size. 501.00 1.052 527.00 Fees include one (1) hour plan review and one (1) visual inspection. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 4.1 Each additional inspection. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 17 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Install, Repair Private Fire Service Hydrants and/or Piping to Firewater Lines 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 4.2 Minimum plan review base fee of system. 501.00 1.052 527.00 Fees include one (1) hour plan review and one (1) visual inspection.

Master Fee Schedule
32

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 PR – 4.2.1 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Fire service main installation also requires hydro and flush. See 4.3 & 4.4 Flush - Private Fire Service System
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 4.3 Minimum inspection base fee. 251.00 1.052 264.00 Fee includes one (1) hour onsite inspection time.
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 4.3.1 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 Hydrostatic Test - Private Fire Service System
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 4.4 Minimum inspection/test base fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 Fee includes one (1) hour onsite test time.
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 4.4.1 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 Water Flow Information Field Test
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 4.5 Minimum field test base fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 (Fee includes field testing for available fire flow for Hydrant and Fire Sprinkler Systems) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 4.5.1 Additional or multiple flow tests per ½ hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 SECTION III – PLAN REVIEW

GROUP FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
Tenant Improvement Fire Sprinklers (without calculations) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5 Minimum plan review base fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.1.1 Plus $1.00 per head in excess of 10 heads. 1.00 1.052 1.00 Fee includes one (1) hour of plan review and one (1) field inspection. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.1.2 Additional inspections per hour (i.e. weld-o-let, hydro, visual, etc…) 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Tenant Improvement Fire Sprinklers (with calculations)
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.2 Minimum plan review base fee. 624.00 1.052 656.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.2.1 Plus $1.00 per head in excess of 10 heads. 1.00 1.052 1.00 Fee includes 1.5 hours of plan review and one (1) field inspection. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.2.2 Each additional inspection per hour (i.e. weld-o-let, hydro, visual, etc…) 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 New Commercial Fire Sprinkler System (13, 13R, & 15 systems) Master Fee Schedule
33

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 PR – 5.3 Minimum plan review base fee per riser. 1,002.00 1.052 1,054.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.3.1 Plus $1.00 per sprinkler head. 1.00 1.052 1.00 Fee includes two (2) hours plan review and two (2) field inspections. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.3.2 Each additional inspection per hour (i.e. weld-o-let, hydro, visual, etc…) 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Residential Fire Sprinkler System (single family home)
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.4 Minimum plan review base fee. 564.00 1.052 593.00 Fee includes one (1) hour of plan review and 1 water service flush, 1 overhead hydro & 1 final.
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.4.1 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Residential Fire Sprinkler System (multiple homes)
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.5 Minimum plan review base fee per model. 624.00 1.052 656.00 For model only - fee includes one (1) hour of plan review and 1 water service flush, 1 overhead hydro & 1 final.
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.5.1 Each additional lot (flush, hydrostatic test and final) 376.00 1.052 395.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.5.2 Each Additional inspection per hour (i.e. models, individual homes) 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 SECTION III – PLAN REVIEW

GROUP FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
Standpipe System
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.6 Minimum plan review base fee. 753.00 1.052 792.00 Fee includes plan review and one (1) field inspection.
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.6.1 Each additional inspection per hour (i.e. hydro, flush, flow test, etc…) 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Spray Booth (includes booth and fire extinguishing system) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.7 Minimum plan review base fee. 753.00 1.052 792.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
Fee includes two (2) hours plan review and one (1) field inspection. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.7.1 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 Master Fee Schedule
34

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Pre-Action Fire Suppression System
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.8 Minimum plan review base fee. 753.00 1.052 792.00 Fee includes one (1) hours plan review and two (2) field inspection. *(Fire alarm review (6.1) not included)
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.8.1 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Fixed Fire Suppression System – (wet/dry chem., water mist, etc…) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.9 Minimum plan review base fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.9.1 Each additional separate system at same location. 251.00 1.052 264.00 Fee Includes plan review and one (1) field inspection.
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.9.2 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 SECTION III – PLAN REVIEW

GROUP FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
Clean Agent Fire Suppression System
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.10 Minimum plan review base fee. 1,002.00 1.052 1,054.00 Fee includes one (1) hour plan review and up to 3 hours of inspection time. *(does not include fire alarm plan review – see Sec. PR 6.1) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.10.1 Each Additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Fire Pump Installation
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.11 Minimum plan review base fee. 1,754.00 1.052 1,844.00 Fee includes two (2) hours plan review and up to five (5) hours field inspection time. *(does not include review of generator or separate fuel storage tank) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.11.1 Each Additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Master Fee Schedule
35

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Commercial Cooking (Hood and Duct) Fire Suppression System 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 PR – 5.12 Minimum plan review base fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.12.1 Each additional system review $251.00 each. 251.00 1.052 264.00 Fee includes one (1) hour plan review and one (1) hour of inspection time. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.12.2 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Smoke & Heat Vents
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.13 Minimum plan review base fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 Fee includes one (1) hour plan review and one (1) hour of inspection time. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR –5.13.1 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Smoke Management/Control System
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.14 Minimum plan review base fee. 1,754.00 1.052 1,844.00 Fee includes two (3) hours plan review and up to four (4) hours field inspection time. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.14.1 Each Additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Explosion Control (includes: vents, dust collection, etc…) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 5.15 Minimum plan review base fee. 1,002.00 1.052 1,054.00 Fee includes two (2) hours plan review & up to two (2) hours field inspection time. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–5.15.1 Each Additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 SECTION III – PLAN REVIEW

GROUP FIRE ALARM SYSTEM
Fire Alarm System
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 6 Minimum plan review base fee. 624.00 1.052 656.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 6.1 Plus $ 11.00 per initiating & notification device. 11.00 1.052 12.00 Master Fee Schedule
36

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
Fee includes two (2) hours plan review and up to one (1) hour field inspection time. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 PR – 6.1.1 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 6.1.2 Pre-wire inspections assessed at $ 251.00 per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 Dedicated Function Fire Alarm System (i.e. sprinkler monitoring, elevator recall, etc…) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 6.2 Minimum plan review base fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 Fee includes one (1) hour plan review and one (1) hour of field inspection time. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR–6.2.1 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Fire Alarm Panel Replacement Only
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 6.3 Minimum plan review base fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 Fee includes one (1) hour plan review and up to one (1) hour field inspection time. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 6.3.1 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 High-Rise Fire Alarm (new and/or system upgrade)
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR - 6.4 Minimum plan review base fee. 2,005.00 1.052 2,108.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR - 6.4.1 Plus $ 11.00 per initiating device & notification device. 11.00 1.052 12.00 Fee includes four (4) hours plan review and
up to four (4) hours field inspection time.
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR - 6.4.2 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 6.4.3 Each per-wire inspection where required. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour 125.00 1.052 131.00 SECTION III – PLAN REVIEW

GROUP FLAMMABLE & COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS (TANKS- PIPING & DISPENSING) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 Install Underground Tanks
Master Fee Schedule
37

Fire
Last increase
implemented
ECI Index for last
increase
Index Effective
date for proposed
ECI Index for
proposed ECI Factor
Municipal Code
or Other Code
Description Old Fee Factor CURRENT FEE
City of Richmond
Master Fee Schedule
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 PR – 7 Minimum plan review base fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 Fee includes one (1) hour of plan review of tank location and One (1) hour of site inspection time.
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Remove (Repair, Modify, Extend Piping) Underground Tank 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 7.1 Minimum plan review base fee. 753.00 1.052 792.00 Fee includes one (1) hour plan review and two (2) hours of inspection/site time. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-7.1.1 Each additional inspection/stand-by time per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 Install (Repair, Modify, Extend Piping) Aboveground Tank 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 7.2 Minimum plan review base fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 7.2.1 Each additional tank. 251.00 1.052 264.00 Fee includes one (1) hour plan review and one (1) hour of inspection/site time. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 7.2.2 Each additional inspection. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Abandon Underground Tank in Place
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 7.3 Minimum plan review base fee. 753.00 1.052 792.00 Fee includes one (1) hour plan review and two (2) hours of inspection/site time. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 7.3.1 Each additional inspection/stand-by time per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 Environmental Upgrade (vapor recovery and processing systems, spill control, secondary containment and environmental agency requirements) 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15 PR – 7.4 Minimum plan review base fee. 501.00 1.052 527.00 Fee includes one (1) hour plan review and one (1) hour of inspection time. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 7.4.1 Each additional inspection per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-20 Re-submittals or revisions. 251.00 1.052 264.00 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR-21 Additional plan review time, per half hour. 125.00 1.052 131.00 Apply Interior Coating to Flammable Liquid Tanks
1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 7.5 Minimum plan review base fee. 753.00 1.052 792.00 Fee includes one (1) hour plan review and two (2) hours of inspection/site time. 1-Jul-2019 139.7 1-Jul-2021 146.9 1.052 RMC 2.40.110, RMC

2.34.040.32d, Ord. No.
15-14 & Reso No. 75-15
PR – 7.5.1 Each additional inspection/stand-by time per hour. 251.00 1.052 264.00 Master Fee Schedule
38