General Conditions/EJ/TE 01-19-11 11 of 13
29. Third Parties. Nothing herein shall be interpreted as creating any rights or benefits in any third parties. For purposes hereof, transferees or assignees as permitted under this Contract shall not be considered "third parties."
30. Governing Law. This Contract shall be construed in accordance with the law of the State of California without regard to principles of conflicts of law.
This Contract is made in Contra Costa County, California, and any action relating to this Contract shall be instituted and prosecuted in the courts of Contra Costa County, California.
31. Nonrenewal. Contractor understands and agrees that there is no representation, implication, or understanding that the services provided by Contractor under this Contract will be purchased or renewed by the City under a new contract following expiration or termination of this Contract, and waives all rights or claims to notice or hearing respecting any failure by City to continue the purchase of all or any failure to continue purchase of all or any such services from Contractor.
32. Claims. Any claim by Contractor against City hereunder shall be subject to Government Code §§ 800 et seq. The claims presentation provisions of said Act are hereby modified such that the presentation of all claims hereunder to the City shall be waived if not made within six months after accrual of the cause of action.
33. Interpretation. This Contract shall be interpreted as if drafted by both parties.
34. Warranty. In the event that any product shall be provided to the City as part of this Contract, Contractor warrants as follows: Contractor possesses good title to the product and the right to transfer the product to City; the product shall be delivered to the City free from any security interest or other lien; the product meets any specifications contained herein; the product shall be free from material defects in materials and workmanship under normal use for a period of one (1) year from the date of delivery; and the product shall be fit for its intended purpose(s). Notwithstanding the foregoing, consumable and maintenance items (such as light bulbs and batteries) shall be warranted for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days from the date of delivery. All repairs during the warranty period shall be promptly performed by Contractor, at Contractor's expense, including shipping.
35. Severability. In the event that any of the provisions or portions or applications thereof of this Contract are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, City and Contractor shall negotiate an equitable adjustment in the provisions of the Contract with a view
General Conditions/EJ/TE 01-19-11 12 of 13
toward effecting the purpose of this Contract, and the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions or portions or applications thereof, shall not be affected thereby.
36. Authority. City warrants and represents that the signatory hereto (the Mayor of the City of Richmond or the City Manager) is duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of City. The party signing on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she is duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of Contractor, and shall be personally liable to City if he or she is not duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of Contractor.
37. Waiver. The waiver by City of any breach of any term or provision of this Contract shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach.
Inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the City relating to the Contractor’s performance, or payments therefore, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor’s obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the City be thereby stopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions of this Contract.
38. Possessory Interest. If this Contract results in the Contractor having possession of, claim to or right to the possession of land or improvements, but does not vest ownership of the land or improvements in the same person, or if this Contract results in the placement of taxable improvements on tax exempt land (Revenue and Taxation Code 107), such interest or improvements may represent a possessory interest subject to property tax, and Contractor may be subject to the payment of property taxes levied on such interest.
39. Performance and Final Acceptance.
Contractor represents that it is experienced, qualified, registered, licensed, equipped, organized and financed to perform the services under this Contract.
Contractor shall perform the services under this Contract with that degree of skill and judgment normally exercised by professional firms performing services of a similar nature in the State of California, and shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of the services it performs under this Contract. In addition to the other rights and remedies which City may have, Contractor shall, at its own expense, correct any services which fail to meet the above standard.
General Conditions/EJ/TE 01-19-11 13 of 13
City shall provide Contractor an opportunity to cure errors and omission which may be disclosed during the review of submittals, with no increase in the authorized Contract Payment Limit. Should Contractor fail to make necessary corrections in a timely manner, such corrections shall be made by the City and the cost thereof shall be charged to Contractor.
If warranted, City shall determine, and Contractor may request such determination, that Contractor has satisfactorily completed performance of this Contract. Upon such determination, City shall issue to Contractor a written Notice of Final Acceptance, after which Contractor shall not incur further costs under this Contract. Contractor shall respond to such Notice of Final Acceptance by executing and submitting to City a Release and Certificate of Final Payment.
40. Survival. The rights and obligations of the parties which by their nature survive termination or completion of the services covered by this Contract shall remain in full force and effect after termination or completion.
For the Contract between the City of
Richmond and
EXHIBIT E
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The General Conditions are hereby amended to include the following modifications and/or provisions (if applicable):
For the Contract between the City of
Richmond and
EXHIBIT F
INSURANCE PROVISIONS
During the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, the CONTRACTOR shall keep in effect insurance policies meeting the insurance requirements specified in the insurance provisions which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements - Type 2:
Professional Services
Type 2 – Page 1 of 3
Revised: September 2011
In all instances where CONTRACTOR or its representatives will provide professional services (architects, engineers, construction management, counselors, medical professionals, hospitals, clinics, attorneys, consultants, accountants, etc.) to the City of Richmond (City), the City requires the following MINIMUM insurance requirements and limits.
CONTRACTOR shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract, agreement, or other order for work, services or supplies, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder and the results of that work by the CONTRACTOR, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors. Maintenance of proper insurance coverage is a material element of the contract. Failure to maintain or renew coverage or to provide evidence of renewal may be treated by the City as a material breach of contract.
CONTRACTOR agrees that in the event of loss due to any of the perils for which it has agreed to provide Commercial General Liability insurance, CONTRACTOR shall look solely to its insurance for recovery.
CONTRACTOR hereby grants to CITY, on behalf of any insurer providing Commercial General Liability insurance to either CONTRACTOR or CITY with respect to the services of CONSULTANT herein, a waiver of any right to subrogation which any such insurer of said CONTRACTOR may acquire against the CITY by virtue of the payment of any loss under such insurance.
Original, signed certificates and original, separate policy endorsements, naming the City as an additional insured for general liability coverage, as well as a waiver of subrogation for Workers’ Compensation insurance, shall be received and approved by the City before any work may begin. However, failure to do so shall not operate as a waiver of these insurance requirements.
City reserves the right to modify or require additional coverages for specific risk exposures depending on scope of CONTRACTORS work.
Minimum coverage is detailed below. The policy limits of coverage shall be made available to the full limits of the policy. The minimum limits stated herein shall not serve to reduce the policy limits of coverage of CONTRACTOR.
Minimum Scope of Insurance – the following forms shall be provided and coverage shall be at least as broad as the following:
1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (ISO Occurrence Form CG 0001), and including coverage for bodily and personal injury, property damage, and products and completed operations (if applicable).
2. Insurance Services Office Automobile Liability coverage (ISO Form CA 0001, Code 1, Any Auto).
3. Original and Separate Additional Insured Endorsement for General Liability (ISO Form CG 20 10 11/85 or its equivalent) with primary and non-contributory language.
4. Workers’ Compensation Insurance as required by the State of California including Employer’s Liability coverage.
5. Original and Separate Waiver of Subrogation for Workers’ Compensation insurance.
6. Professional Liability or Errors & Omissions Liability Insurance appropriate to the CONTRACTOR’s profession (if required.)
Required Coverage Minimum Limits
Workers’ Compensation and
Employers’ Liability
Statutory limits as required by the State of California including $1 million Employers’ Liability per accident, per employee for bodily injury or disease.
If CONTRACTOR is self-insured, provide a certificate of Permission to SelfInsure, signed by the California Department of Industrial Relations and SelfInsurance. If contractor is a sole proprietor (has no employees) than contractor must sign “Contractor Release of Liability” found at:
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.
General Liability
(primary and excess limits
combined)
$2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If the policy includes a general aggregate, either the general aggregate shall apply separately to this project, service or location or the minimum required aggregate limit shall be twice the per occurrence limit ($4 million aggregate limit).
Policy shall be endorsed to name the City of Richmond as an additional insured per the conditions detailed below.
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements - Type 2:
Professional Services
Type 2 – Page 2 of 3
Revised: September 2011
Automobile Liability $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and property damage.
PROJECT COST REQUIRED LIMIT
$0 - $1 million $1 million p/o
$1 million - $5 million $2 million p/o
Over $5 million $5 million p/o
Professional Liability or Errors &
Omissions Liability –
Required for all professionals
including architects, engineers,
consultants, construction
management, counselors, medical
professionals, hospitals, clinics,
attorneys and accountants, & other
consultants as may be required by
the City.
Required Policy Conditions
Additional Insured Endorsement Applicable to General Liability coverage.
The City of Richmond, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers are to be named as additional insureds for all liability arising out of the operations by or on behalf of the named insured including bodily injury, deaths and property damage or destruction arising in any respect directly or indirectly in the performance of this contract.
ISO form CG 20 10 (11/85) or its equivalent is required. If the Contractor is supplying their product or providing a service then the endorsement must not exclude products and completed operations coverage. If it does, then CG 20 37 (10/01) is also required.
SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.
Primary and Noncontributory The contractor’s insurance coverage must be primary coverage as it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers. Any insurance or self insurance maintained by the City is wholly separate from the insurance of the contractor and in no way relieves the contractor from its responsibility to provide insurance.
Waiver of Subrogation
Endorsement Form
Contractor’s insurer will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for Workers’ Compensation Insurance during the life of this contract.
SAMPLE Endorsements can be found at
http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/index.aspx?nid=61.
Deductibles and Self-Insured
Retentions
Any deductible or self-insured retention must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retention as respects the City or the CONTRACTOR shall procure a financial guarantee in an amount equal to the deductible or self-insured retention guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration and defense expenses.
Contractor is responsible for satisfaction of the deductible and/or self-insured retention for each loss.
A. M. Best Rating A:VII or Better. If the A.M. Best Rating falls below the required rating, CONTRACTOR must replace coverage immediately and provide notice to City.
Umbrella/Excess Liability Policies
If an Umbrella or Excess Liability Policy is used to meet the liability limits, coverage shall be as broad as specified for underlying coverage’s and cover those insured in the underlying policies.
___ Exhibit F
___ Section 8
City of Richmond - Insurance Requirements - Type 2:
Professional Services
Type 2 – Page 3 of 3
Revised: September 2011
Claims-Made Policies
If any insurance policy is written on a claims-made form: 1) the retroactive date must be shown, and must be before the date of the contract or the beginning of contract work. 2) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5) years after completion of the contract of work. 3) If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made policy form with a retroactive date prior to the contract effective date, the Contractor must purchase an extended period coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after completion of contract work.
Subcontractors
CONTRACTOR shall include all subcontractors as insured under its policies or shall furnish to the City for review and approval, separate certificates and endorsements for each subcontractor. All coverage for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the requirements stated herein.
CONTRACTOR agrees to defend and indemnify the City of Richmond for any damage resulting to it from failure of either CONTRACTOR or any subcontractor to take out or maintain the required insurance policies. The fact that insurance is obtained by CONTRACTOR, and/or CONTRACTOR’s subcontractors, will not be deemed to release or diminish the liability of CONTRACTOR, including, without limitation, liability under the indemnity provisions of this contract. Damages recoverable by CITY from CONTRACTOR or any third party will not be limited by the amount of the required insurance coverage.
Verification of Coverage
All original certificates and endorsements shall be received and approved by the City before work may begin.
The City of Richmond reserves the right to require complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies including endorsements affecting the coverage at any time.
Original insurance certificates and required policy endorsements shall be mailed or delivered to the Designated Project Manager for the City of Richmond.
Insurance certificates and endorsements may be faxed to the Designated Project Manger. However, CONTRACTOR must mail the original certificates and endorsements to Designated Project Manager once faxed.
Continuous Coverage
CONTRACTOR shall maintain the required insurance for the life of the contract. Should the CONTRACTOR cease to have insurance as required during this time, all work by the CONTRACTOR pursuant to this agreement shall cease until insurance acceptable to the City is provided. In the event that CONTRACTOR fails to comply with the City’s insurance requirements, the City may take such action as it deems necessary to protect the City’s interests. Such action may include but is not limited to termination of the contract, withholding of payments, or other actions as the City deems appropriate.
If services or the scope of work extend beyond the expiration dates of the required insurance policies initially approved by the City, CONTRACTOR must provide updated certificates and endorsements indicating that the required coverage, terms and conditions are still in place. Renewal certificates and updated endorsements shall be mailed to the Designated Project Manager.
Cancellation
CONTRACTOR shall ensure that coverage shall not be cancelled, reduced or otherwise materially changed except after thirty (30) days’ prior written notice has been given to the City.
Reporting Requirements
Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
Consistent with Public Policy
The insuring provisions, insofar as they may be judged to be against public policy shall be void and unenforceable only to the minimum extent necessary so that the remaining terms and provisions herein may be consistent with public policy and thus enforceable.
Richmond PD Agreement 12/12/2022 1 of 7
Public Safety Family Counseling Group, INC. (Consultant) Scope of Services
SCOPE OF SERVICES
The primary purpose of this service contract is the ongoing support, training, and oversight of the Richmond Police Department (Police) peer support team, Critical Incident Stress Management (CISM) programs, and facilitation of the emotional wellness of Police personnel while providing 24/7/365 response and support services to Police employees. All services listed herein are limited to the Richmond Police Department and Richmond Police Department employees except as listed in sections 3.3 and 3.4.
SERVICES
1. 24/7 On-Call/Standby Availability
1.1. Consultant will be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for Crisis Response and Stabilization Services for Police Department personnel.
2. Unlimited Crisis Response and Stabilization services. Such services may include, but are not limited to critical incident stress debriefings, crisis management briefings, on-site response, crisis intervention, and in person consultation as necessary following extraordinary events encountered by Police’s personnel or impacting the performance of Police personnel’s duties. Crisis Response and Stabilization services also include Consultant’s expert response to and intervention with personnel experiencing a suicidal crisis.
2.1. Crisis Response and Stabilization Services may be rendered at Police’s offices, in the field, at Consultant’s offices, virtually, or any other location as deemed necessary, approved by, and agreed upon by Consultant and Police.
2.2. In the event that Consultant is requested to respond to an active scene or incident, Police personnel shall accompany Consultant when requested.
2.3. In the event of a catastrophic incident, loss of life, significant injury to personnel, or other major incident, Critical Incident Stress Management services will be extended to spouses and significant others of Police personnel.
3. Individual Crisis Stabilization and Counseling Services
3.1. Consultant will provide Individual Crisis Stabilization and Counseling Services as requested for Police personnel, including 24/7 availability as needed.
3.2. Consultant will provide first responder specialized support and individual crisis intervention and, as necessary, appropriate professional referrals to Police’s employee assistance program or other suitable venue as necessary subject to the terms below.
3.2.1. Individual crisis intervention is defined as up to twenty (20) one-hour, one-on-one crisis intervention sessions per year without the need for referral or authorization from Police.
Such sessions may be provided either in-person at Consultant’s offices or virtually as determined by the treating clinician and individual seeking services.
EXHIBIT G
Richmond PD Agreement 12/12/2022 2 of 7
3.2.2.In the event that employee self-refers, or is directed or referred by Police, because of a suicidal crisis, services shall be rendered without regard to session or time limits until one of the following occurs. The suicidal crisis is stabilized, abated, or the affected employee is referred to a higher level or other suitable care.
3.2.3. Referrals to third party services such as employee assistance programs, outside wellness training, or recovery/treatment retreats are not covered under this Agreement and are subject to other agreements between Police and the third-party provider.
3.3. Consultant will provide up to five (5) individual transition specialized sessions for retired Police personnel or Police personnel approaching retirement in order to help with the adjustment from active to retired status.
3.4. Consultant will provide up to five (5) individual sessions for Police employees placed on administrative leave in order to facilitate healthy coping and transition through any related process. Sessions will specifically focus on preparing personnel to return to duty following administrative leave or, where warranted, their transition out of the Department. These sessions may be used post separation for personnel leaving the Department for reasons other than retirement.
3.5. Consultant will provide one (1) session for any new Police hire and their spouse or significant other in preparation to attend a POST Basic Academy in order to facilitate resiliency and successful completion of their training. This session should occur either just prior to or within the first two weeks of starting the academy. One (1) additional session may be offered to the new Police employee when entering the Field Training Program.
4. Workers Compensation
4.1. While Consultant does not accept Workers Compensation cases, Consultant will provide up to five (5) individual sessions for injured personnel with the goal of transitioning to the Workers’ Compensation process, if requested. The Consultant shall not treat, diagnose, or otherwise engage or interfere in any part of the formal Workers Compensation process, treatment, or legal process. Consultant shall not provide reports of these sessions to the Police or any other party without a properly executed release, legal mandate, or court order.
5. Telephone, email, and virtual Consultations
5.1. Expert collaboration with Police Personnel regarding issues related to Critical Incident Stress, crisis intervention, education needs, organizational matters, disciplinary matters, terminations, or separation from service, and other psychological services as requested.
5.2. Provide on-going consultation to the Police’s Peer Support Team on topics including, but not limited to, program development, team selection, and team operations.
5.3. Consult with Police Personnel regarding critical incident stress management support education services for line, supervisory, and management staff as requested.
5.4. Unlimited telephone, email, and virtual consultations are provided as “Base Services” under this agreement.
Richmond PD Agreement 12/12/2022 3 of 7
6. Peer Support Team Member Services
6.1. Consultant will provide four (4), one-on-one check-in appointments per year for each Police peer support team member, coordinator, and liaisons for the purpose of fostering professional wellness in their assigned role and to support positive wellness habits.
7. Training Services
7.1. Introductory Program Presentations
7.1.1. Consultant will conduct up to eight (8), introductory Police patrol briefing presentations for the purpose of introducing Consultant’s firm, services, and program goals. Consultant will solicit and compile peer support team member nominations following a blind nomination process as requested by Police.
7.1.2. Police agrees to make arrangements for professional, non-sworn, and other administrative personnel to attend one of the aforementioned trainings.
7.2. Command Presentation and Training
7.2.1. Consultant will conduct one 1-hour presentation for Police Command Staff as requested in order to familiarize them with CISM and peer support team program goals and operations.
7.3. Supervisory Presentation and Training
7.3.1. Consultant will conduct one 2-hour presentation for Police first line supervisory staff as requested in order to familiarize them with identifying employees in crisis, CISM, and peer support team program goals and operations.
7.4. Line Personnel Training
7.4.1. Consultant will provide up to four (4), four-hour training blocks per year covering CISM, wellness, and resiliency for Police line level personnel.
7.4.2. Training will be presented at Police facilities, or other suitable facilities arranged and paid for by Police, and may be open to outside agencies upon Police’s request with Consultant approval.
7.5. Spouses Program Training and Consultation
7.5.1.Consultant may provide up to two (2) four-hour training blocks during a Police Spouse’s Academy or Family Day event. Such training will be custom tailored to issues facing spouses or families and may include specialized topics as requested by Police.
7.6. Regional Peer Support Continuing Education Training
7.6.1. Participation in Regional Peer Support Continuing Education Training for all Police designated liaisons, coordinators, and peers is included as a Base Service.
Richmond PD Agreement 12/12/2022 4 of 7
7.6.2. Participating agencies share a rotating responsibility for hosting Regional Peer Support and Coordinator Meetings. Responsibility for hosting said trainings and meetings is split among participating agencies on a rotating basis.
7.6.3. Regional training may be offered in person or via a virtual electronic platform.
7.7. Peer Led Trainings
7.7.1. Upon request, Consultant shall design and supply two (2) 15-minute training programs designed to be presented by Police peer support team members during briefing or other short format gatherings. These training programs shall be designed to enhance resiliency, increase mental wellness, and/or address specific problems within the agency or industry as a whole (i.e., healthy alcohol consumption, dealing with personal crisis, available CISM resources). Consultant will train designated personnel in the delivery of this training program.
7.7.2. Upon request, Consultant shall design and supply one (1) Police new hire training and orientation program designed to be presented by peer support team members during the first few weeks of a new employee’s orientation to the Police. These training programs shall be designed to increase stress awareness, understand the negative impacts of longterm stressors, enhance resiliency, increase mental wellness, orient new employees to peer support and other wellness resources within and outside of the agency, and/or address specific topics as requested by Police. Consultant will train designated Police personnel in the delivery of this training program.
7.8. Consultant will provide up to two (2) “Blue Sky” Strategic Planning Sessions per fiscal year.
Blue Sky sessions may be utilized by any work group within the Police Department; however, they are highly recommended for Peer Support Team program planning and development.
7.9. All training requests must be submitted at least 90 days in advance.
8. Meetings
8.1. Consultant will help facilitate and attend regular peer support team meetings exclusively for Police’s peer support team members. Said meetings shall be set up by a Peer Support Team Coordinator or Liaison and should occur once per quarter. These meetings may be held/attended in-person or virtually.
8.2. Consultant will help facilitate and attend Police peer support team coordinator and liaison meeting as requested. Said meetings shall be set up by a peer support team coordinator or liaison.
These meetings may be held/attended in-person or virtually.
8.3. Consultant shall attend Police Command Staff meetings as requested for the purpose of discussing and making recommendations as to CISM, wellness, and peer support needs within the Department.
8.4. Consultant shall attend Police Supervisory Staff meetings as requested for the purpose of discussing and making recommendations as to CISM, wellness, and peer support needs within the Department.
Richmond PD Agreement 12/12/2022 5 of 7
8.5. Consultant may provide or attend additional Police meetings or other gatherings beyond those outlined above as requested by Police.
8.6. Consultant may prepare and provide presentations on topics of concern, within Consultant’s specialty, as requested at any of the aforementioned meetings.
8.7. Having Consultant periodically attend Police Command and Supervisory meetings provides the opportunity to embed wellness and mental health resources within the culture of the Department thereby enhancing the acceptance and delivery of Consultant’s resources. It also allows for the discussion of sensitive or challenging issues facing the Department, as well as the identification of future challenges. Clinical presence at the command level helps serve as a reminder of the importance of wellness and resiliency that can then be modeled to the rest of the Department in order to enhance and promote a culture of resiliency and wellness. Additionally, it allows for the presentation of current research, industry trends, and other pertinent information in a timely manner allowing for rapid implementation and response to emerging issues.
9. Policy Development and Review
9.1. Consultant will supply Police with a Sample Peer Support Policy and assist Police personnel with review and recommendations for creating a comprehensive Peer Support Team and CISM Policy.
9.2. Police shall have their own City Attorney and/or risk manager review any recommended policy prior to implementation. Police is responsible for ensuring that any proposed policy is compliant with city, state, and federal law.
10. When Police requests services to be rendered onsite, Police shall make suitable space available to Consultant. When suitable space is not available, Police shall make other location arrangements appropriate for the services to be rendered.
11. When Consultant is unavailable or unable to render services as indicated above, Consultant shall make necessary arrangements for referral to appropriate mental health professionals for coverage and make contact information available to Police personnel.
12. Consultant shall not be responsible for computer, video, audio, or other technological needs for Police or Police’s personnel to attend training or access services.
1. ADDITIONAL SERVICE TERMS Services may be rendered in-person, via telephone, email, or virtual platform based on the specific circumstances, nature, and needs of the service, Police, and Consultant. Response services shall be provided in-person except under extraordinary circumstances.
2. Regional Peer Support Continuing Education Training may be provided in person or virtually and may be rescheduled, postponed, or cancelled for extraordinary events.
3. In the extraordinary circumstance that Consultant is unavailable or unable to provide 24/7 standby/oncall availability, Consultant shall make necessary arrangements with appropriate mental health professionals for coverage and any expense incurred by Consultant in doing so shall be the sole responsibility of Consultant.
4. Copyright and Right of Use
Richmond PD Agreement 12/12/2022 6 of 7
4.1. Any and all work, artwork, copy, posters, billboards, photographs, videotapes, audiotapes, systems designs, software, reports, designs, specifications, drawings, diagrams, surveys, source codes or any original works of authorship created by Consultant or its subcontractors or subconsultants in connection with services performed under this Agreement shall be deemed the exclusive intellectual or otherwise licensed property of Consultant and Consultant shall retain all rights therein except where provided by a separate agreement.
5. Third Party Insurance Verification
5.1. Consultant shall not be required to comply with third-party insurance verification or compliance services. Consultant shall supply copies of required insurance to City prior to payment for City’s review and acceptance. Specialized terms, clauses, language, or coverages are not available under this Agreement.
6. HIPAA Requirements
6.1. Confidentiality of Consultant’s services and records are governed by State and Federal statues, court decisions, ethical standards, and generally accepted business practices for their profession.
Notwithstanding any other section of this Agreement, no record or other identifying information, including but not limited to HIPAA protected information shall be released without a valid court order, written authorization from the individual(s) affected by the information release, or other legal authority compelling release of such information. Additionally, compliance with any audit or inspection requirement contained herein necessitates an investment of Consultant’s time, efforts, and resources in order to maintain the required confidentially of records subject to audit or inspection and as such, shall be considered billable hours and compensated according to this Agreement. This section shall supersede all other sections and shall survive termination, cancellation, or expiration and remain in effect indefinitely.
7. Confidentiality of Consultant’s Information
7.1. The terms of this Agreement are considered public information pursuant to the California Public Records Act (Government Code section 6250 et seq.). The Parties agree to exercise at least the same care, legal and professional standards, security, and confidentiality for any confidential information received from the other party as they would for their own confidential and protected information.
8. All services are subject to suitability for any given circumstance based on the professional clinical judgement of Consultant, in compliance with the Standard of Care, Professional Ethics, and legal standards of the Consultant’s profession. Services may be adjusted, altered, or declined when/where deemed necessary based on the presenting circumstances and the servicing clinician’s judgement.
Alternative resources may be provided where appropriate.
8.1. Referrals to third party services such as employee assistance programs, outside wellness training, or recovery/treatment retreats are not covered under this Agreement and are subject to other agreements between Police and the third-party provider.
9. Billing and Invoices
9.1. Consultant shall endeavor to provide a monthly utilization statement to the Police no later than the 10th day of each month following the month in which services are provided. The utilization will include a description of services rendered and the date on which such services were
Richmond PD Agreement 12/12/2022 7 of 7
provided. Due to HIPAA restrictions individual client information will at no time be included in accounting information. Utilization statements shall be combined with monthly invoices for convenience.
9.2. Police shall ensure timely requests for and utilization of Consultant’s services. Any services not utilized within any Calendar Year while this Agreement in effect are non- refundable and will be lost as of December 31st of each year this Agreement remains in effect. Failure of Police to utilize Consultant’s services in a timely manner shall not be cause for a refund or extension of time.
The undersigned, an authorized agent of (hereafter
"Contractor"), has had an opportunity to review the requirements of City of Richmond Ordinance 12-18 (hereafter "Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance" or “SCCO”). Contractor understands and agrees that the City may choose with whom it will maintain business relations and may refrain from contracting with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Contractor understands the meaning of the following terms used in the SCCO:
a. "Data Broker” means either of the following:
i. The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling such information to their customers, which include both private-sector business and government agencies; ii. The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose from that for which it is ultimately used.
b. “Extreme Vetting” means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar services."
Contractor understands that it is not eligible to receive or retain a City contract if at the time the Contract is executed, or at any time during the term of the Contract, it provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE.
Contractor further understands and agrees that Contractor's failure to comply with the SCCO shall constitute a material default of the Contract and the City Manager may terminate the Contract and bar Contractor from bidding on future contracts with the City for five (5) years from the effective date of the contract termination.
By executing this Statement, Contractor certifies that it complies with the requirements of the SCCO and that if at any time during the term of the Contract it ceases to comply, Contractor will promptly notify the City Manager in writing. Any person or entity who knowingly or willingly supplies false information in violation of the SCCO shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a $1,000 fine.
Based on the foregoing, the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed this day of , 20 , at , California.
Printed Name: Title:
Signed: Date:
Business Entity:
Vendor SCCO Compliance Statement (Augt2020)
EXHIBIT H
CITY OF RICHMOND
Sanctuary City Compliance Statement
December 20, 2022
Police Department
DATE: December 20, 2022
TO: Mayor Butt and Members of the City Council
FROM: Bisa French, Chief of Police
Subject: Proposed Purchase of Sleeper Trailer from Midway Trailers, Inc.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: American Rescue Plan Act funds will be utilized for the purchase of the trailer in an amount not to exceed
$184,000. This purchase will most likely fall within the “Replacing Lost Public Sector Revenue” category.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:
n/a
STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:
The Police Department currently has 38 sworn vacancies
and regularly needs to hold over officers for mandatory overtime shifts in order to maintain minimum staffing
levels. The Department seeks to purchase a bunkhouse
trailer for temporary housing to enable officers to rest between their work shifts and other job responsibilities.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVE and APPROPRIATE the use of American Rescue Plan Act Funds, in the amount of $184,000
(including tax), for the purchase of a Bunk House Trailer from Midway Trailers, Inc. – Police Department (Chief
Bisa French 510-621-1802).
DISCUSSION:
The Richmond Police Department maintains minimum staffing levels of a lieutenant, watch commander, two patrol sergeants, and nine patrol officers per shift in order to provide basic police services in a City that is 52 square miles and is populated by over 116,000 residents. Due to 38 sworn vacancies in the Department, officers are frequently AGENDA
REPORT
December 20, 2022
required to work on their days off or work extended shifts to meet minimum staffing requirements. Since July 1, 2022, officers have worked over 1,172 mandatory shifts and over 168 extended shifts.
A police officer’s job responsibilities do not end after their 10-hour or 12.5-hour shift because they often have to appear in court, attend meetings, or participate in mandatory training sessions after their shift. These additional responsibilities often result in officers working 18-hour shifts and having minimal rest between their next shifts or driving home.
Since July 1, 2022, the Department has hired two officers while losing twelve officers to retirements and resignations. In numerous exit interviews of officers who have resigned to work at other agencies, an overwhelming critique of the Department is the need to work mandatory shifts and the impact these shifts have on officers and their families.
City staff believes a bunkhouse trailer would help alleviate some of these stressors, assist with providing effective police services, and support our recruiting and retention efforts.
The around-the-clock nature of the policing profession has always necessitated temporary housing for police officers, but the current staffing crisis has exacerbated the problem. Oftentimes, officers sleep in their personal cars in the Department’s parking lot or find an empty office in the building to rest. Earlier this year, an officer was involved in a car accident after he fell asleep while driving home and there are countless stories of officers needing to pull off the freeway in order to not fall asleep while driving home. In a recent poll of the Department, 77 percent of respondents (72 officers) stated they would use a bunkhouse trailer if made available.
The Police Department seeks to purchase the bunkhouse sleep trailer through a piggyback procurement. Richmond Municipal Code §2.52.330 Piggyback Procurement authorizes the City’s Purchasing Manager to purchase equipment when the pricing and terms have been previously established by another public agency. The U.S. General Services Administration (USGSA) assists other government agencies in buying goods and services by pre-negotiating contracts. On July 28, 2022, the USGSA issued a solicitation for two bunkhouse trailers on behalf of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
On August 10, 2022, the USGSA awarded the contract to Midway Trailers, Inc. as the most responsive bidder. Midway Trailers, Inc. has offered to extend the discounted pricing to the City of Richmond.
Midway Trailer’s, Inc. did not include sales tax on the attached quote; however, the City of Richmond is required to pay tax on any tangible item purchased for its own use. The following breakdown reflects the grand total, including sales tax, as shown below:
December 20, 2022
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
Attachment 1 – U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Contract Attachment 2 – Midway Trailers, Inc. Quote
Attachment 3 – RMC 2.52.330 Piggyback Procurement
Attachment 4 – Piggyback Justification
Price: $ 149,900.00
Mattresses: $ 7,979.00
Shipping (est.): $ 9,900.00
Tax: $ 15,393.20
+/-: $ 827.80
Grand Total: $ 184,000.00
2023 Diamond Cargo
Sleeper Bunkhouse Trailer
!" #$ %%& #'())*!*)'+,'+*-!*,'-./- $'- '00/-)!( -'.1*# !+. '00/-)!( #/-2)/# """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" !" -)/,'#* #3/.1(/ """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" )*/0 )+$'-0!*)'+ """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" !'1+*)+4 !+. !-'-)!*)'+ .!*! """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" !" ./()2/-5 #3/.1(/ """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
66
7 8
796
:;
<8
6
6
=
!"% ">% '+*-!* */-0# !+. '+.)*)'+#?'00/-)!( -'.1*# !+. '00/-)!( #/-2)/# @+'2 A """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" % !" "> '+*-!* */-0# !+. '+.)*)'+# -/B1)-/. *' )0(/0/+* #*!*1*/# '- /C/1*)2/ '-./-#?'00/-)!( -'.1*# !+.
'00/-)!( #/-2)/# @0!5 A @D1( A @./2)!*)'+A """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""" !" +'*)/ ()#*)+4 (!1#/# )+'-'-!*/. E5 -/$/-/+/ """""""""""""""""""""""" F !"F 2!!- G">F -'2)#)'+# !+. (!1#/# !()!E(/ *' 2! !B1)#)*)'+ '$ '00/-)!( )*/0# @!- A """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" G !"G 2!!- G"&>F% ()0)*!*)'+# '+ #1E'+*-!*)+4?0'+)*'-)+4 !+. '0()!+/ @D1( GA """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" & !"& 2!!- G"%>F !.0)+)#*-!*)2/ '+*-!*)+4 '$$)/- @'* A """" !" 2!!- G"%F>F ./()2/-5 ('!*)'+ @'* GA """"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" !" 2!!- G"%F>F !H)+4 $'- .'0/#*) #3)0/+* @'* GA """"""""""""
! "#!
"
! " !$
" #
% & "
' "
"
! "
( ) *+ ,-.) ,//.)
012 34567 897: ;6953 <=3>?@ABC D4@?A34 E?BF G3H5 @7H 43I4?J34@B645 =34 K96B3L 2*M
N"
OPPQ
"
"N "
"
"
"
&
"
" !$ ! "
( /RMMRRMS TII?>3 6I
BF3 FMS U67M03H?>@A 67B4@>B
VDV +JM/
/RMMMRRM
WX
,//.)
%'
! " !$ & "
'
%'
(
) SM E33:5
!
""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
# $#%&
!
!
'
!
!
!
!(
)( %*
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
+- \=G>A= ,?E CLQC@,?@I,D B<,?P= >BBLAC I? @<= B>?FI@I>? >G @<= I@=JU L?D=CC @<= B<,?P= IC FL= @> @<= F=G=B@ I? @<= I@=JM
+Q- 8005]/^2/4: ;<= >?@A,B@>A >A I@C ,CCIP?== J,E ,CCIP? I@C AIP<@C @> A=B=IO= H,EJ=?@ FL= ,C , A=CLD@ >G H=AG>AJ,?B= >G @<IC B>?@A,B@ @> , Q,?VU @ALC@ B>JH,?EU >A >@<=A GI?,?BI?P I?C@I@L@I>?U I?BDLFI?P ,?E _=F=A,D D=?FI?P ,P=?BE I? ,BB>AF,?B= TI@< @<= `CCIP?J=?@ >G D,IJC `B@ + aMbMM cc-M d>T=O=AU T<=? , @<IAF H,A@E J,V=C H,EJ=?@ +=MPMU LC= >G @<= N>O=A?J=?@TIF= B>JJ=ABI,D HLAB<,C= B,AF-U @<= >?@A,B@>A J,E ?>@ ,CCIP? I@C AIP<@C @> A=B=IO= H,EJ=?@ L?F=A @<IC B>?@A,B@M
+B- ef9/]20: <,?P=C I? @<= @=AJC ,?F B>?FI@I>?C >G @<IC B>?@A,B@ J,E Q= J,F= >?DE QE TAI@@=? ,PA==J=?@ >G @<= H,A@I=CM
+F- gICHL@=CM ;<IC B>?@A,B@ IC CLQh=B@ @> i aMbMM B<,H@=A cU >?@A,B@ gICHL@=CM _,IDLA= >G @<= H,A@I=C @> @<IC B>?@A,B@ @> A=,B< ,PA==J=?@ >? ,?E A=KL=C@ G>A =KLI@,QD= ,FhLC@J=?@U BD,IJU ,HH=,D >A ,B@I>? ,AICI?P L?F=A >A A=D,@I?P @> @<IC B>?@A,B@ C<,DD Q= , FICHL@= @> Q= A=C>DO=F I? ,BB>AF,?B= TI@< @<= BD,LC= ,@ _=F=A,D `BKLICI@I>? j=PLD,@I>? +_`j- MXU gICHL@=CU T<IB< IC I?B>AH>A,@=F <=A=I? QE A=G=A=?B=M ;<= >?@A,B@>A C<,DD HA>B==F FIDIP=?@DE TI@< H=AG>AJ,?B= >G @<IC B>?@A,B@U H=?FI?P GI?,D A=C>DL@I>? >G ,?E FICHL@= ,AICI?P L?F=A @<= B>?@A,B@M +=- k2l5/5456/0: ;<= BD,LC= ,@ _`j MXU g=GI?I@I>?CU IC I?B>AH>A,@=F <=A=I? QE A=G=A=?B=M +G- mn3o09pq2 r2q9s0: ;<= >?@A,B@>A C<,DD Q= DI,QD= G>A F=G,LD@ L?D=CC ?>?H=AG>AJ,?B= IC B,LC=F QE ,? >BBLAA=?B= Q=E>?F @<= A=,C>?,QD= B>?@A>D >G @<= >?@A,B@>A ,?F TI@<>L@ I@C G,LD@ >A ?=PDIP=?B= CLB< ,CU ,B@C >G N>F >A @<= HLQDIB =?=JEU ,B@C >G @<= N>O=A?J=?@ I? =I@<=A I@C C>O=A=IP? >A B>?@A,B@L,D B,H,BI@EU GIA=CU GD>>FCU =HIF=JIBCU KL,A,?@I?= A=C@AIB@I>?CU C@AIV=CU L?LCL,DDE C=O=A= T=,@<=AU ,?F F=D,EC >G B>JJ>? B,AAI=ACM ;<= >?@A,B@>A C<,DD ?>@IGE @<= >?@A,B@I?P tGGIB=A I? TAI@I?P ,C C>>? ,C I@ IC A=,C>?,QDE H>CCIQD= ,G@=A @<= B>JJ=?B=J=?@ >G
! "#$ % % "
&$
$ # # %$' %
%
$(
%
#$$ ' %
$#
& %
%
&$#(&
! ) '$ # # %
# $ ! *"" $ #" % # #" % #$$+ ,!- .)# /
,- 0% # $ #$ %
( #$ !
)#
%$ #& ,#$
$# )#
"
%#$ 1
- # %
$
!
% # $ # $ ) )# + 2 )# (
3
, - 4(
$ #" % # $ #$5
, - .)#
($5
, - # $ ($
( ($
" &&
% #$
$ ($5
, )- 6$ & #
7
#" ($
&$
&$ #" % (
)$
5 ,)- 8% && ! ($
#" % &(
! %
#"
! ($
' !% #"
% &( " % &&
# 9#)$(
#"
!5
,) - 0$( #"
# "#$ &$#(& &( #""$
5 ,) - 4(
$ #" #""
# '%#( &( # 5
,) - 4(
&%# ($ #" &$# # # " ) #"
" ) )# 5
, - 0&$ .
" # 4($ ,0.4-+ 0% # $ #$ %
0.4 # % )#
#
" $7 $
'%$ % # $ +
,- :
$# "
$"$ ,:;0- < ! "#$( #+
,2- 0% # $ #$ %
:;0 < ! "#$( # # % )# #
" $7 $
'%$ % # $ +
,=- ." :;0 < ! "#$( # # $7 $
# # % )#
#$
$ "#$ % )#
# &$#&$ )#
% # $ #$ %
%) (
#$$ :;0 < ! "#$( #
#$
' % % &&
#
# &$#) #
# $
,+!+
+>
(
:
$# ;
0$"$38 ( "#$ 2'$
?!(
#$ +>@
(
:
$# ;
0$"$3* %$ 0% 8 ( "#$ 2'$
?!( -
#$ &&
!
&$#
$+
,- :;0 < ! "#$( # # $7 $
" % 9#)$( ' )
% $7 $( #
& :;0+
,- .)# '
%
#$
' % % $#(& ( 2 , A+8++ B-
*"" #" ?!(
=
! ,*?=- &$#(& &( $!
# ;C &$ +
,%- DEFGHF IHJGKHIFL/ 0% # $ #$ %
( " % 9#)$(
#"" $
(&
#
! !
! #
"#$
#$
!
$ #$
# $ #$ "$ !( #"
#$
( # "$ !
A
8 #$ "#$ ! &
!
"
# $ %
%# %
" #!
&
#
" "#'(
#
%
% "$ (
" #
# ")
*
+
#), *+ -./01 233/4./56
# " (( ' %
"
'
7&## &
'# (
& (
&
"
#
#" " %
#
" #)
*+ 89:04. 42;0/<.6 = 7&## >
((
#
# # >
# ? * @)A)) B+ #
# $(
#" CD
)
*+ EF/3.9:<G3 HI<51 J92<1K/9 LEHJM6 N% 7&## "
# '
OC=! " )P
*'+ %
OC= ($")
*Q+ RG13:I<.6 N# ##
# >
#
"$# %% % (
#!
" (( '
$ % %
#&
) C
$
" %
$
#
"$# #!
# " (( ' #"
& '# # >
" #
#
"
%
#
% # (#
%$#" #"%
#
" )
*+ ST/942;0/<.16 N% # '" > % $ (
# %
##
#
#&
# 7&## " >
" &
# # %
##
#
#&
#! # " ((, *
+ D
&
# $#
# %%
# # (# >
"
# % &
#
#($
# , *?+
$"#" % &
# *) )! $
(
#! #$"
#!
(
U$
# "! *"+ % &
#+V
*W+ ?%% # #$' # (
&
#$'!
%
(
'(V
*+ ?%% (
#
"$'(
#
!
%
(
'(V #
*X+ #
# % #)
*
+ &
%
# # "$
# $#
# #
#
Y%%
)
*+ -<./9/1.6
*
+ ?(( $#" '
'( '
# 7&## $#
"
# " (( ' "
(
#" % $ $#
(
$#(""
>
#
" %
'
# $) =
#" " (( '
#" "'(
" '
A
%
="$
"
&
# Q @)A)) ZB! >
"
(
'(
# >
$#
'" $! "
&
# *
+*+*&+ %
" ($"! # #
(
'( % "
[P
#
" %
[ '
A
$#
( $#
"
)
*
+ = 7&##
""$ # %
# # $
# %
#
# '
" $ $# #)
*
+ HG<2F 5/3G1G:<16 = #
# Y%%
>
((
""$ %
#(
"
# " U$
'
)
%, Page 1374 of 2052
!""
#
$
%&
'
( )
'$ "
#% * #
+),
-
"
&) & .$ #
#% /
0 $)&+ #'
## %+
!""
* '& )/
" # #'
# "
/
+' $&))
'$) *
/
#
%
$)
)
.$)#
)
&&' /
+'
',
.$))
#"
' "
&&
#% /
0 $)&+ #'
## %+
!""
) 1231
0 4"
#'
# "
/
+' *
) /
0 $)&+ ))$# "
#%5 #'
# "
/
+'
&$## "
& #
) )
&& # "+ )
' #$ #
)
& #'
# "
/
+'1
0 '$) )
&& % #$
& ) " "&&* #
)6
#
" (# $#
)
1
- #
" "
) *
#'
# "
/
+'5
&$#
+ #'
# "
/
+'
)$& "
'
#"
$&
'
1
0
)
)
&& %
'/$# "
$
& $'%
"
&#
#
+) 0&0#
% #$ #
# # 7 #
*
#)
# ""
0) /
+' "
'
,
- #
" ))$
"
80
'
9
"
' *
'$
* ) /
+
%&
) % * &#
)
#
)
#%,
#
*
'$ * &#
#
//& #
#% *$&#
* )
0 %
' /
+
%&
1 0
)
'
# $#
)
&
$) '
+ %
#$
# $#
/
#$
)
/
)
%# :; 1<3 ""
#
" )
1
= >?@A BC DB@@E F&))
)/
"
&&+ /
0 #)
* )5
)9 " &))
#
'
)$//& ) /
0 ## $#
)
)
&&
'
*
$ &5
# )
&& /
))
80
' $/6
G& 0
+ " )$//& )
5 "
)/
) "11%1
,
G& 0
+ " )$//& ) 80
'
#)
)/
" #
5 "
)/
) "11%1 #)
1
9 HIJK@E
/
&$#)
&&
//&
%& :#
&5 L
5
# &
&
()
# #$ )1
& HKMN?OIP?BO CBM PQK RBSKMONKOPT@ UBOSKO?KOUKE 80 '
)
0)
'
)
5
+ /
"5 "
) )&
0
1 4 0 " )$
'
5
)
&& ''#
&+ )/
&& *
9
$#
# )
&& ''#
&+
$)
+
#
&& " ) )$//&
)
# )$%
)
) *
91 L$%=
') " )
5
)
&& % /
#
/
"
/
"&
/
" *
9 /
"
'# /
"
'
5 /&$)
)
%&
)
! "
#
$%
#
&
'
!
"(
) *
(( + ,"
%(& -
"
#
%
%(
%"%
) *
%#%
#
!
! &
#
"
.
) *
(( + %
& -$ %
" -
+(& "(
! + !
)
/0 12345678596 :93 ;7<=2> *
! &
' & %
'
"
! & "( +&
'
(
%(& -
&
'
(
%!
!' "% ,"
' -
,"
"
"" % ) ?
!
"
'
!
((
+ (
+(
& "
"%%(
!
%'
(( + (
+(
! & ((
#
%!
+&
(-) ?
!
%%(&
"('
"
(( +
!
)
/0 158@2> A(
%
(
-
'
(
"
"
(( %
! "% %' #(
-
-
!
$
%
&
( %
)
/0 B733768C> *
-
%(
(
!
"
+(
"
%
"( %"%
+
)
/%0 D545878596 9: @57E5@58C> FG%
-
%!
+& G%
-&'
-
(( + (
+(
!
,"
( #
"(
# &
%
)
/,0 H8I23 ;94J@576;2=> *
(( %(& -
(( %%(
+( K(' L ((
(-
' G"
!
' "(
#"(
%%(
+(
% "
)
/0 M94J@576;2 N58I @7N= <65O<2 89 P9Q2364268 ;96837;8=> * #
%(&
-
A)L)) (
# (
"
%%%
"
("
K(
R S A)L)) T (
#
(
+
R T A)L))
% U'
V$ W"
L & L
R T A)L))
% SU' X
$+$
R T A)L)) TU
A)L)) TY (
# -
(+(- %
R TY A)L)) TS' K(& Z
R
T A)L))
% (
# %"
#
&)
/
0 H3[23 9: J32;2[26;2> Z&
(
(( +
(! +&
#
!
# %
((-
# \
/0 *
"(
"%%(
]
!
)
/0 *
Z
#
' ^
%"
' &
' ?!
' _
%(
' %(
-
`-
A
," !
' A"
a _+(
#
%#%
("
R
/0 *
("
)b)
/T0 Z
(
'
("
# & (
#
%"
-)
! "
#
$"%
&
" ! " ' %#
( )"%
*
* +
, --.#
/ $"%
*',%
0 %1"2 0
* ",%
. )"%
%!
#
34% %
%*5
' 6789:;<=>?@A BCD>E8:><7F#
G1%
%*
&
" ' ! " ' %0 H"%
I '
I
%
% J'
%*
'
*%
"
'2K%
I G
* L %
M%
% N&
%%,%
GLMN0 )%
, ! %
%
)$0
,
%&
',%
&
%%,%
0 "
'*%
I ' %
%J'
& "%
O %
,%
*%,
!I "%
I
%
%
I !
*,&% 0 0 !%% 0
I
"%
2I " H'*
%%
N
PQ%!%
I N
L### -0 "%
!H
& " & %
R
N
I '" ' % '
%
!
%2% &
"% O %
,%
#
S%"%
"% O %
,%
I O %
,%
'"
T%* %
* ' %
" 2% *%%,%*
" % &
%%* '" ' % 2I
'% !
%
&
"% GLMN0 )$0
,
%&
',%
&
%%,%
# U! "% GLMN0 )$0
,
%&
',%
&
%%,%
V%*
WXYZ[\X ]^ _` ]\Yaab cdecf gZh ZY ZWXaY cZij]Y]gda iacX]^eki lam\mn _cdecfPoY]jb ZY _gYZokaP oY]jb &
%%,%
0 %1%'
*%
2
* "% O %
,%
I O %
,%
'"
T%*
%
* ' %
'" ' %#
N
I '" ' % *%%,%* 2%
V%
!
, "% GLMN0 )$0
,
%&
',%
&
%%,%
#
&
" ' ! " ' % *%
I
*%,
!
2I "% O %
,%
"
%1
% I '"
T%* 2I '%
*
%!I '"
T%* '
*%
2% &%
I
%&'
*
%*'
% #
p7q<=r<=8:><7 Cs =@t@=@7q@m uXa vZ^WY]cWZYwk YajYaka^W]WeZ
* %
!
0
'*
&
" % ,
%%* %%
I "% I %, !
NH
* x
&%,%
Nx0
%
%*
2I
%!%
%
%
"%
#
G
* ! ' %
NQQGSQLx +N4 #P- $S)4N) )G4x NSQ $SQU)U$Sy$xxG4UNM 4$QL) NSQ $xxG4UNM G4zUG
' % "
%
%* 2I
%!%
%
% 2I
S',2%
0 )%0
* Q%0 " % "%
,% !
%
* %!!% ! "%I H%
% & %
!' %1# L
%J'% 0 "%
& $!!%
H
,V% "%
!' %1 2%#
)"% !H
& ' %
%
%*
#P-
**%
*', "
R
!"
#
"
$
" %
&
#
"
#
%
'
( ) '*"# )
'
% )
+,- ./0 1234,5314 6/,77 51897: ;<3/ 3/0 =1771;<2> ?0@04,7 A5BC<6<3<12 D0>C7,3<12 +?AD- 57,C606E ;/<5/ ,40 <2514914,30@ <2 3/<6 51234,53 F: 40=040250E 31 <89708023 941G<6<126 1= 7,; 14 HI05C3<G0 14@046 ,997<5,F70 31 ,5BC<6<3<126 1= 5188045<,7 941@C536 ,2@ 5188045<,7 604G<506J +- KLME 41/<F<3<12 12 D0BC<4<2> 043,<2 N23042,7 12=<@023<,7<3: A>40080236 14 O3,3080236 +PAQ R- +6053<12 RS 1= T<G<6<12 HE .<370 UNNE 1= 3/0 12617<@,30@ ,2@ ?C43/04 123<2C<2> A994194<,3<126 A53E +CFK VK L- ,2@ <36 6C5506614 941G<6<126 <2 6CF60BC023 ,994194<,3<126 ,536 +,2@ ,6 0I302@0@ <2 5123<2C<2> 40617C3<126--K +- KSWE 41/<F<3<12 12 1234,53<2> =14 X,4@;,40E O1=3;,40E ,2@ O04G<506 T0G07190@ 14 41G<@0@ F: Y,69046Z: V,F ,2@ [3/04 1G040@ H23<3<06 +Q[U - +O053<12 S 1= CFK VK WM-K
+- KSWE 41/<F<3<12 12 1234,53<2> =14 043,<2 .0705188C2<5,3<126 ,2@ U<@01 OC4G0<77,250 O04G<506 14 HBC<98023K +Q[U - +O053<12 \\M+,-+-+A- 1= CFK VK W-K +S- KMLE 41/<F<3<12 12 1234,53<2> ;<3/ N2G0430@ T18063<5 14914,3<126 +Q[U -K +- KLE 413063 A=304 A;,4@ +AC> MM- + ]KOKK -K +- KLSE A997<5,F70 V,; =14 ^40,5/ 1= 1234,53 7,<8 +[53 S- +CF7<5 V,;6 \LRR ,2@ \LR\ +M ]KOKK \ 2130--K
+F- ./0 1234,5314 6/,77 51897: ;<3/ 3/0 ?AD 57,C606 <2 3/<6 9,4,>4,9/ +F- 3/,3 3/0 1234,53<2> [==<504 /,6 <2@<5,30@ ,6 F0<2> <2514914,30@ <2 3/<6 51234,53 F: 40=040250 31 <89708023 941G<6<126 1= 7,; 14 HI05C3<G0 14@046 ,997<5,F70 31 ,5BC<6<3<126 1= 5188045<,7 941@C536 ,2@ 5188045<,7 604G<506J
_`a +- KWE D0634<53<126 12 OCF51234,5314 O,706 31 3/0 b1G0428023 +P]Q -E ;<3/ A73042,30 N +Q[U - +S ]KOKK SRS ,2@ ]KOKK S-K _a +- KWE 1234,5314 1@0 1= ^C6<2066 H3/<56 ,2@ 12@C53 +Q[U - +S ]KOKK M-K
_a +- KWE c/<6370F71;04 413053<126 C2@04 3/0 A804<5,2 D051G04: ,2@ D0<2G0638023 A53 1= M +P]Q - +O053<12 1= CFK VK L-K +A997<06 31 51234,536 =C2@0@ F: 3/0 A804<5,2 D051G04: ,2@ D0<2G0638023 A53 1= MK-
_`a +S- KSWE D09143<2> HI05C3<G0 189026,3<12 ,2@ ?<463L.<04 OCF51234,53 A;,4@6 +P]Q - +CFK VK MW\- + ]KOKK 2130-K
_a +- _D0604G0@a
_a +- KSWSE O04G<50 1234,53 D09143<2> D0BC<4080236 +[. - +CFK VK WRE 6053<12 RS 1= T<GK -K
!
"#$
%!$ &
'"
$ #( &
)*
+
#$, -"
.#/
- # $
01 2
3 "#$
%!$,
45 *6 7 ,
!$ "# "- 1
8 9 :;< =>?@AB@CDE @FA G?HA>DIAD@JK .#$
,$ LM
#
*6!"#$
%!$ #( N $M
"#$
%!$"
, 1
6%
/
*,'
#/
/ "
"'",
/ -"
1 6%
+
#$ O4P Q
#"$
: :0: Q'/%$
, "- *62 !23 R % 2%62
.#-"
+%$ "# &
(%
/ #( &
,'"#, 6 2 $3 S%$$
,
4!$ 9 Q
&
,
/
: O"$ !
"- TQUV"#
$0R, /
"
"2
0 "*
!
RN%
/
W
Q
%
: O"$ !
"-
!
W %2*%$ "#
-
#!
-"
TQUV"#
+%22 U*, #
,,
"#!
#,
W - $M
"--
"
2 !$, $" N%
$M
'
-
#!
$ ,M%22 ," #/ !%$
# $,
"--
Q
%
&
,
/
8 :0 O"$ !
"- 5"$%2
+%22 U*, #
,,
$0R, /
O4P Q
R2$
#%$
. SR& "- :0
:0 O"$ !
"- %
$ %2
+%22 U*, #
,,
$0R, /
O4P Q
R2$
#%$
. SR& "- :0
:09 Q$ 2 X%$ "# "-
+%22 U*, #
,, "#!
#, 4!$ 9 Q
/ %#/
::
+%22 U*, #
,,
*6!"#$
%!$ #( 2%# O4P Q
/
R2$
#%$
. O4P "- :0:
R2$
#%$
.. O4P "- :0:
R2$
#%$
... YQO "- ::
R2$
#%$
.P
W "- ::
9 :0 O"$ !
"-
$0R, /
"- 4
/
, SR& Q
R2$
#%$
. SR& "- :0
8 : : 7 + $%$ "#, "#
*6!"#$
%!$ #(
W Q
,
:0 7 )* /%$
/ 1%+%(
,Z
*6!"#$
%!$ #( 2%#
W Q
/[
: O"$ !
"-
!
01 ,%62
/ P
$
%#04N#
/
+%22 U*, #
,,
$0R, /
W Q
-
!"#$%& '($)) *+ ,- %
.%$( /-%-0%- -, $
, '1
2' $
") -%,$ - 3 4"/
5
6 7-
5 '- !" &- 5
%
% '
)-!'
+%7- "#$%&
17 ,
(7$))8
9 $&:$, $.-& ;
(-,!<#,-& '($)) *+ ,-
,7-%, '1 2' =(
>
6 7-
5 '- !" &- 5
%
% '
)-!'
+%7- "#$%&
;
(-,!<#,-& '($))
*+ ,-
,7-%, 1).?)- 2,&-% @- ;
(-,!<#,-& '($)) *+ ,- %
.%$( '1
2' =(
!
<%&-% 3 +-& 9%-7 )8 2,&-% '($)) *+ ,- /- -%:- 4"/ 2' >>%
)
6 ,($,+5$7 +%-% /+)- '1 2' =
= !
,:7 A$?
% B+,- 1< =
@)& A$?
%C
0-%$
, # @ "+ @
% - $,& /-(-&- B2A
91D3"E3<6 1<
!
%
@?
,
5 '-.%-.$ -& F$7) - "/
1G+$) <00
% +, 8 '1 1< >
") -%,$ - 3 F1*
5 !
1G+$) <00
% +, 8 5
% D- -%$, B26
2' >
") -%,$ - 3 B2AH >
5 !
1G+$) <00
% +, 8 5
% ;
%I-% # @ 9 $?) - B26 2'
=
") -%,$ - 3 B2AH >
5 !
=
1(0)
8(-, /-0
%
, D- -%$, B26
2' >
> !>
6 57$
,
5 1(0)
8-- /.@ 2,&-% @- 6$
,$) A$?
% /-)$
, "7
91 1< >
!
(?$ ,. E%$557I,. , -%
, 6<D 2' 7@$0 -% =
$,& 1< =
") -%,$ - 3 4"/
5 ! 2' 7@$0 -% =
$,& 1< =
!>
1(0)
8(-, 1).?) 8 D-%57$
, 4"H 1 <
6
$00)7$?)-
@- $7G+
,
5 7
((-%7$))8 $:$)$?)-
55! @-! @-)5 -(
% 7-% $,
@-% 80-
5 7
((-%7$) 0%
&+7
% 7
((-%7$) -%:7- $ 0%- 7%?-& , F"/
!" # $% #&'#( ")# $% *#'$+#&#, -" #&". $( #( %$&
/
0# )(" #, 1 #! -"2 3 4 56
'/ 7$ "88.'"9.# $ :# "';< $( $%
'$!!#&'"..2 "+"."9.# $%% :# :#.% #!
/. #&(" # 1 -/= 3 $%
4 56
7$ "88.'"9.# $ :#
"';< $( $% '$!!#&'"..2 "+"."9.# $%% :# :#.% #! 3
>?$(#0#8.# () 6<9 "('# "(, @): A.$9". B"&!() $ #( ". @2,&$%.<$&$'"&9$( C57
>
-"( #("('#
6#&+'#
*#8"&
$& 0 8$ ". $% *#%&)#&" $(
;<8!#( "(,
/& $(, $(#& C57
>
4
/';< $( $%
/DE*#) #&#, 1!")()
;<8!#( C57 4
> 4 "(, 4
/. #&(" # 1 >D $%
4 4
/';< $( $%
/DE*#) #&#, D#.#+ $( C57 4
> 4
"(, 4
/. #&(" # 1 C57 4 $% 4
4
(#&)2
%%'#('2 (
(#&)2$( <!() &$,<' -/= 4 56
3
9
4
/';< $( $%
/DE*#) #&#, #& $(". $!8< #& &$,<' >D
> 4 "(, 4
/. #&(" # 1 C57 4 $%
F 44 G3
('$<&")() $( &"' $& $.'# $ H"( D#I -# ")() B:.# 0&+() C57
>
4
/#&$ $. C57
>
4
J$"! C57
>
4 4
&+"'2 D&"(() C/7 56 "
/. #&(" # 1 C/7 $% 4
F 43
H<2 /!#&'"(K6<88.# 7>L 4 56 ':"8 #& 3 4
H<2 /!#&'"(KJ&## D&",# /)&##!#( K1 &"#. D&",# /' C5M 0
L1/D1>7
56 ($ #
56 ($ #
56 3 ($ #
56 4
($ #
56 ':"8 #&
#' $( 44
<9 M 3
3
33
33
3
3
3
4
4
"(, 4
/. #&(" # 11 C5M 0
L1/D1>7 $%
/. #&(" # 111 C5M 0
L1/D1>7 $%
!
" #$% &'( )*+, ,-. / '0 $ % 1 / '0 #2$
3 4 5 %$
67$62#% 2#
$
6# 82
6!# 9
7:
% % 8*; *-<%
=
27>
"
$62#%
#
%$
$9$ %
"6#6%$
?@ $: -AA67 2A 82
6!# %% $% 2#$
2> 2A $:
) =
$" #$ 2A $:
%9
@
2#$
7$2
%
A2
"6#!
6B
$ 0 79
6$@ 89#7$62#% -9$%6
$: '#6$
0$
$ % - 0 7$62# C
%
" #
2A $: .
$62#
> ) A #% 9$:2
6D
$62# 7$ A2
86%7
> E
CF '0 .2$
4G .2$67 2A )6%
%$
2 *"
! #7@
0 $4 %6
.2B H G '0
G 4 5 %$
67$62#% 2# 09?72#$
7$6#! -9$%6
)6%
%$
2 *"
! #7@
.2B
H G '0
/
I 2#
$
6# 82
6!#
279
" #$% 8*;
4/
"% A2
86#
#76#! 2A 9
7:
% % 2A 2""
76 >
2 97$%
#
2""
76 > 0
B67 % .-+ G '0 G '0 HA
H 4 ,#%$
>>" #$
@" #$% A2
2""
76 >
2 97$%
#
2""
76 > 0
B67 %
.-+ G '0 G '0 HA
3 C 4
@" #$ ?@ *> 7$
2#67 89#
%
#%A
J0@%$ " A2
K
L
#
! " #$
-7$ C '0
/ 4G
@" #$ ?@ *> 7$
2#67 89#
%
#%A
J-$:
$:
# 0@%$ " A2
K
L
#
! " #$ &9> '0
4G
2B6
6#! 77 >
$
@" #$% $2 0"
>> ;9%6# %% 09?72#$
7$2
% )*
)*+, ,-. 'M '0 /
#
'0 H
/4
6B
7@ 2
0 79
6$@ 0
A !9
% 'M // '0
G4
@" #$% $2 0"
>> ;9%6# %% 09?72#$
7$2
% & . H '0
H
6 GH4G
A
#7 A2
6B
$ >@ -K#
'048>
! 2""
76 > + %% >% .-+
G '0
#
'0
66 >$
#
$ , =
2A GH4G
666 >$
#
$ ,, .-+ 2A GH4G
7 : 2#$
7$2
%:
>> 72"=>@ K6$: $: 8 5 7>
9% % 6# $:6% =
!
=: 7
==>67
?> $2
72""
76 > %
B67 % $:
$ $: 2#$
7$6#! -AA67
:
% 6#
67 $
% ? 6#! 6#72
=2
$
6# $:6%
72#$
7$ ?@
A
#7 $2 6"=> " #$ =
2B6%62#% 2A >
K 2
*I 79$6B 2
%
==>67
?> $2
7196%6$62#% 2A 72""
76 > =
2 97$%
#
72""
76 > %
B67 %N
4G 0
B67 2#$
7$ (
?2
0$
#
% 'M C G '0 7:
=$
H
!
"# $%&'(
) !
*
+ #", - . ,
) /', + 012 3 4
!. 4
56
7 , 8
-
', 9
:",
!.
,.+ 15
!.
,('5 "!
,
5 9
:",
!.
,.+;,'5
1.<&+
!
0&)
'7) 2
,
!. =7
'"! "!
,
5 + 14> ? 3 4
!. 4
56 7
, 8
-
', 9
:",
!.
,.+ 15
!.
,('5 "!
,
5 9
:",
!.
,.+;,'5
1.<&+
!
012 3 4
!. 4
56
7 , 8
$@ 7
'"! #," 177)'5
'"! "#
6 ,('5 "!
,
5 9
:",
!.
,.+
"
"!
,
5 + #", 0
'!
!
!5
)':,
'"! ", * 7
', "# ,
'! $%&'7 !
;* %&', !
+ 012
4
56
7 , 8
$@ 7
'"! #," 177)'5
'"! "#
6 ,('5 "!
,
5 9
:",
!.
,.+
"
"!
,
5 + #", ,
'!
,('5 +;* %&', !
+ 012 4
56
7 , 8
8 0'!' & A
B + #", "!
,
5 ", A",C ,+ 4!. , $@ 5&
'( =,. ,
D1E
?
'.
'5C 9
( 4!. , $@ 5&
'( =,. , 8 D1E $= 8
3 F ," "
'!B $@5 ++ -"". G"!
'"!
" E"!7,"#'
=,B
!'H
'"!+ D4E
4
83
. " 7
,")) , > ! ,
) $@
'!
'"! "# * 5",. I6 "!
,
5 ", +6
)) 5" 7)J K'
6 6
7,"('+'"!+ "#
6'+ 7
,
B,
76 . '#
6'+ 5"!
,
5 K
+
K
,. . &+'!B "
6 ,
6 ! +
) . :'. '+ '!
@5 ++ "#
6 +' 7)'#' .
5%&'+'
'"!
6, +6").
+ . #'! . '! -1* "!
6 .
"#
K
,. "#
6'+ 5"!
,
5
!. ." + !"
5"!
'!
6 5)
&+
1&.'
!. * 5",.+;E B"
'
'"!
I6 " 7
,")) , > ! ,
) "#
6 4!'
.
+ ",
!
&
6",'H . , 7, + !
'( "#
6 " 7
,")) , > ! ,
) +6
)) 6
(
55 ++
"
!. ,'B6
" @
'!
!J "#
6 "!
,
5 ",L+ .', 5
)J
7 ,
'! !
, 5",.+ '!(")('!B
,
!+
5 '"!+ , )
.
"
6'+ 5"!
,
5
I6 "!
,
5 ", +6
))
C
(
')
:)
'
+ "##'5 +
)) ,
+"!
:)
' +
6 , 5",.+
,'
)+
!. "
6 , ('. !5 #", @
'!
'"!
&.'
", , 7,".&5
'"! &!
') J
,+
#
, #'!
)
7 J !
&!. ,
6'+ 5"!
,
5 ", #",
!J +6",
, 7 ,'". +7 5'#' . '! -1*
&:7
,
8 "!
,
5 ",
* 5",.+ *
!
'"! "#
6 "
6 , 5)
&+ + "#
6'+ 5"!
,
5 M#
6'+ 5"!
,
5 '+ 5" 7)
)J ", 7
,
'
))J
, '!
.
6 , 5",.+ , )
'!B
"
6 K",C
, '!
. +6
)) :
.
(
')
:) #", J
,+
#
,
!J , +&)
'!B #'!
)
, '!
'"! +
) !
* 5",.+ , )
'!B
"
77 )+ &!. ,
6 .'+7&
+ 5)
&+
",
" )'
'B
'"! ",
6 +
) !
"# 5)
' +
,'+'!B &!. , ", , )
'!B
"
6'+ 5"!
,
5 +6
)) :
.
(
')
:) &!
') +&56
77 )+ )'
'B
'"! ", 5)
' +
, #'!
))J , +")( .
1+ &+ . '!
6'+ 5)
&+ , 5",.+ '!5)&. :""C+ ."5& !
+
55"&!
'!B 7,"5 .&, +
!.
7,
5 '5 +
!. "
6 , .
, B
,.) ++ "#
J7
!. , B
,.) ++ "# #", I6'+ ." + !"
, %&',
6 "!
,
5 ",
" 5,
",
'!
'!
!J , 5",.
6 6 "!
,
5 ", ." + !"
'!
'! '!
6 ",.'!
,J
5"&,+ "# :&+'! ++ ", 7&,+&
!
"
7,"('+'"! "# )
K
!
"#$"%
&
'(
$
)
"
!"
)
* +* '*
&
'(
$
*
"
'"
"#$" &(
, -./ '(
$
*
"
)
"
!"
)
$+' "
' &" '%%"'
( )" $'
" '%%"'
(
"0'
1 2 (
"
'
+(*
3 &
&(
(( +
"#$" +,
'(
$
4 15* "
'" & 6$
7
'
$' 89 : 21;11
<1
1=<* "
+ /#$" ! "
> "
( &
(, .!"%
"
;
%
?. @
' @: & A0
7* B( 9>>* &
(
-$"
"
$ ! .))")"
.'* $+1 C1 =
$''
" )"0
$+
#$
))")"
'
3 ' $ ! "
($
1
1:5* "
+ "
' ! &" D
"
"* ;&
"*
;"0'
A0()
" "0 +, E
)"
F, C
+
8
" 0" 7
89 ;' : & $+1 C1
5<1
0 1:5* "
+ "
' ! &" "
B('%%$ '
9
;$"0((
' ;"0'
" 7#$)% 1 89 ;' GG<
. & $+1 C1 51
0 1<5G* 2(H
& ;%
(( 6$
'"
8' G 21;11 @
*
((
$+' "
'
&&" &$"
"
$+' "
' ! ))"$
1 >&
$+' "
' 3')
$+' "
'
%
(( +$
' '"
3'
))('
+(
"
(
)'& -./
<1@
&
$+' "
'
" *
$+' "
'" %$
'($ 1<5G ("
"
$+' "
'
&&"
$+' "
' ! ))"$
1 0 1=* "
+ & ;!"!
-
'(
./ 1
0 15* 7#$
( 8))"$ , ;7 7181 :1
0 15* 7#$
( 8))"$ , &" 9"
?2 G 21;11 :1
3 15* 7#$
( 8))"$ , &" I"F"
A
+(
?2 < 21;11 @<1
3 15@* 7%)(,% /)"
9"
?2 G 21;11 :1
3 1=:* &'
& 7%)(, /!
2 "
( C
+" /(
.'
A7 7181 :<1 -( "#$"
''"
'
)
"
!"
)
& & -./ '(
$
1=:1
3 1=:* ;"0' "
' C
+" ;
"
.2J G : 21;11 '
)" @1
3. 1=* %+
! B"
&&'F ! "
89 21;11 '
)" @G
7181 @1
6 .("
> K./ & 1= 21;11 '
)" @G
7181 @1
30 1=* 73%) &"% .))('
&
;"0' "
' C
+" ;
"
"
'
&" K
'*
(+"
* " /)
" & "
7#$)% 4/#$"%
K.L
: : 21;11 '
)" @1
!" #$!
%
& '( !" !# )
*
$ '
!" $(' +(,!$ * ("-($-. !
!" $(' . #!$
$ ( " *
$ '
./0
12 $
" . 3%4 5 5 6* ')(
$ 7
5
&!8
" & 9 , & 8 :
$ # '( !" 3%4 ; <=<
3 "
2 >(9
. #!$ !" $(' !$ >!$?
$. 6"-
$
'2
;$-
$ 5
@%A
( - * '? +
(
6"-
$
'2
;$-
$ 7 @%A ; 7
% 5 $ ('8 B$( " "9 @%A 7 6* ( C %&
$"(
D @%A 7 !# 5
E !" $(' !$.
$#!$
"9 $ (
*
'2$ 8 F2"' !". ;2 . -
)
6"
-
* (
. ;B *
' !" = (. (
"-
- !# )
A( !"(& G
#
".
%2 )!$ H( !" %' #!$
F .'(& 4
($ =I 6* A!
E $!
! "9 '
.. F!!- G!"( !" ! A!"
$!# ;$9(" H( !". @6A 5
6* 7< F&!J -!J" $
12 $
- " (''!$-("'
J )
($(9$(
)
!# F%0 '&(2.
575 $
#
$
"'
#!$ $ (
&8 ;J"
- 6*F&(9 !
$' (& :
..
&. A;:
5 6* ("- 6* F&!J -!J" $
12 $
- " (''!$-("'
J )
($(9$(
) - !#
F%0 '&(2.
575
>) &
"! $
12 $
- )
!" $(' !$
(8 "'&2-
" . .2,'!" $(' . #!$ '!
$' (&
$!-2' .
("- '!
$' (& .
$ '
. (
"
(& "2
,
$ !# (-- !"(& '&(2.
. "
'
..($8 ! .( .#8 .
'!" $(' 2(& !,& 9( !".
"- !# &(2.
KLM NOPQRS TQUPQNV RTKWUSU QNROX
OXKPSY Z[ XS\SXSNRS
B)
#!&&!J "9 '&(2.
. ($
)
$
,8 "'!$
!$(
- ,8 $
#
$
"'
,8 ( !" A2
,
$ B &
("-
G(
" (''!$-("'
J ) )
'&(2.
( F%0 ] +%6** DA;0;0%BG C4
0F0A] '!" ( "
- " ) . -!'2
" *
F%0 #!$ (" "
$"
(--$
.. #
.
' #
- #!$
&
' $!" ' (''
.. ! )
#2&&
!# ( '&(2.
FG0%+ %^6D*DBD;A 0_6+%BD;A 5= F0 )(
$
\KX
N`ab
c
Pdef
Y
e
5 *4*B3 F;0 %>%0G 3%A%_3AB 3%DABA%A ;B = 5= ;330D%+ %AG _;:0A3AB ABDB4 ;G
3%DABA%A
%6_
5 0;:DGDA_ %+0%BG %43AB* B; *3%++
C6*DA** *6C;AB0%B;0*
A;:
< 0;BBD;A ;F gD*BDA_ :_B%BD;A
*B06B60* ^6D3AB 6BD+DBD* %AG
D30;:3AB*
%0 <=5
;0%BD;A* %AG *B;0%_ %0%* %0 <=5
!"
#
!
$!# %
&"
%
' ((#
!
%#(
)
*
+,- ./0 1234,5314 ,64007 31 5189:; <=3/ ,2; 941>=7=12 14 5:,?70 3/,3 =7 =2514914,30@ /040=2 A; 40B040250 31 =89:08023 ,6025; 91:=5; ,99:=5,A:0 31 ,5C?=7=3=12 1B 5188045=,: =3087 14 5189120237D ./0 B1::1<=26 941>=7=127 ,2@ 5:,?707 3/,3 /,>0 A002 5/05E0@ A; 3/0 1234,53=26 FBB=504 ,40 =2514914,30@ A; 40B040250D
GHI JDKLM 188045=,: N@>043=7=26D
GI JDOKLM F46,2=P,3=12,: 12B:=537 1B Q2304073D
GHI JDKLM RC?=98023 F904,3=12 ,2@ S,=2302,250 S,2?,:7D GI JDTKLM U0734=53=127 12 N:3042,30 Q308+7-D
GI JDTKLM N:3042,30 Q308+7-D GV130W 3/=7 =7 , B=::,A:0 5:,?70DI GI JDTKLM N:3042,30 ,5E,6=26 ,2@ ,5E=26D
GI JDTKLTM S,4E=26 1B X=@ Y,89:07D
GI JDKLM Y04>=50Z[=7,A:0@ \0304,2ZF<20@ ,2@ \0304,2ZF<20@ Y8,:: X?7=2077 R>,:?,3=12 ],53147D
GI JDKLM R>,:?,3=12 ],5314 188=380237D
GI JDKLM R51218=5 4=50 N@^?738023 1B 1234,53 4=50+7- X,70@ 12 , 4=50 Q2@0_D GI JDKLM 419143=12,: R51218=5 4=50 N@^?738023 1B 1234,53 4=50+7- X,70@ 12 , 4=50 Q2@0_D
GI JDKLM R51218=5 4=50 N@^?738023`Y3,30 V?47=26 a180 ,40 B14 \0304,27D GI JDKLTM R51218=5 4=50 N@^?738023`S0@=5,=@ b,A14 U,307D GI JDKLM R51218=5 4=50 N@^?738023`]?0: Y?45/,460D GI JDOKOM \N Y8,:: X?7=2077 Y?A51234,53=26 :,2 S=2=8?8 U0C?=4080237D GI JDOKM \N V13=50 1B .13,: Y04>=50Z[=7,A:0@ \0304,2ZF<20@ Y8,:: X?7=2077 Y03ZN7=@0D GI JDOKM \N V13=50 1B .13,: \0304,2ZF<20@ Y8,:: X?7=2077 Y03ZN7=@0D GI JDKLM 1234,53 c14E a1?47 ,2@ Y,B03; Y3,2@,4@7`V?47=26 a180 ,40 B14 \0304,27D GI JDJKLM X12@ 408=?8 N@^?738023D
GI JDJKLM Q2@082=B=5,3=12 ,2@ Q27?4,250D
GI JDJKLM N77=73=26 Y04>=50Z[=7,A:0@ \0304,2ZF<20@ ,2@ \0304,2ZF<20@ Y8,::
X?7=207707 =2 FA3,=2=26 X12@7D
GHI JDKLM R:053412=5 Y?A8=77=12 1B ,;8023 U0C?0737D
!"#
$
%&
'% ()
*
#)
%
"#
$
+
,)
- ,
. %/%+$
%
$ , 0
,%+$# 1%$2%#%
3 - )$ +
4 5 *
6 +
, 7
,
5 8
9
+
, 8
,
5 :
+
.(#%$ +
;%
< $+=$>% > $+=% > $ ,!
0$=% > *
?)%
.
*
(
$
%&
/
$+
% > @//%+
A%.
B(
23
)
#
%
)
#% >
+
C
$ , )2#%+$
%
/
)
#% > *
)#
5 - (
+
%
DE
%
/
$+
%
,
1$
@//
"#
$
%&
:
>
%$
%
A
+< %?)
"#
$
%&
D&$#)$
%
D&$#)$
%
FG
$#
<H$
*
)+
5 ";$, ;%
<
)
DE+<$ >
I2J "##
?)
/
?)
$
%
#%+%
$
%
$ , +
$+
/
+
..
+%$# %
.
&%+
2 (
&%,
,
2 /%+%$%
.)
% +#),
<
/
##
;% > +#$)
K
5 :
,% +%.% $
%
% B
&%+
'
#%&
3
LMNO PQ RSTUVWX
YZ[ \YY] [^Z_`a bcdceYecfgh fg hijkfge]Ykecglm dfgcef]cgl Ygn kfd bcYgko pqib [r
I$J A<%
#%+%
$
%
% +#),
8"* sH5 1%.%
$
%
B)2+
$+
% >
I2J "++
,% >#3 $ 3 +
$+
)#
% > /
.
<%
#%+%
$
%
% )26
+
<
#%.%
$
%
)2+
$+
% >
?)%
.
% 8*
<
#%.%
$
%
)2+
$+
% >
?)%
.
%
<
8"* +#$)
$ $((#%+$2#
A<
$+
% $,&%
,
<$
% (
/
.% > +
$+
$,.% %
$
%
/) +
%
<
$+
% > @//%+
.$3 )
<
&%+
/ $ )((
+
$+
I J
$%
, 23 t"
$ %
% $
% >
<
$+
u +
.(#%$ +
;%
<
<
#%.%
$
%
)2+
$+
% >
(
+
$>
/ ;
= (
/
.$ +
?)%
.
(
+%/%
, %
<
+#$)
A
<$
,
<
)((
+
$+
I J .$3
?)%
$++
$+
u
//%+
;<
<
$+
u
2) %
+
,
<
(
(%
$3 ,$
$ $
$%
, $ ,
&%
; )+< 2) %
+
,
>$,% >
<
$+
u +
.(#%$ +
;%
<
<%
?)%
.
!
" #$ #%
&#"
' ' ( % &# #) #
!
*+,-./0123., 4/.25623., 1,7 8.,9:3;6<.;=/5 1,7 :3;6<.;=/5 .- >.,-<362; .- +,25/5;2 ?@/5505,2A
#
#
"#
B &
# #
"# #
C
#$ #%# &
#
"# # '
!
"#
! D'' #
#
!
"#
' E
#
#
#
#
#
#
'E
E#C #
"# E #
C F
G
"#E#H ' ( #
#E
#
C #$ #
"#
% #'E
#
! E
#
#
$ C
# #$ #
#'
#
GI FH
J#'
H
"#
E
#
#
!##E#
%
"
"#
#
#
C
'E
#) # &C GI KF9LH D&
!
#
#
C
'E
H
!
" &F M"#
#) #
#
# 'C
E
N#
$
&#
C
#
E
C &# #) #
#
&#
"#
! D'' #
#
"#
B
E
# %
"
"# E
&
! ##
!# ' %N #'E
#
#) #E#
F
O
'
#
PQR SPPT UVQWXYZ P[\]^]_`TP`]Sa bc^`TPb`]^d cee]baT fcb` g
M"#
! D'' # ##$#
"# !"
# !
#
E
$#
! D'' #
D '
"# # ' #'E
! #
Nh
#
"#
E
'
"#
F
i" # !
% &#
%
!
"!"
D j#
# ' J##!
% #
'C
"#
#
&
#
E
'
"# DF C '
"# D j#
# ' J##!
% &#
'
"#
"#
F
O
'
#
PQZ SPPT UVQWYXYZ [ak]SaTl kcbP`]c^ fcb` ZUg
i" E#
' # $#
&#
#EH
"#
"
#
H "
&#
m
J#
E#
' (#
#
''
MMnm o
G
I
J $#
j
# IN
I p
O
'
#
PQZZ SPPT UVQWYXYq
Pbr]^d ecT [c\a_`]b _s]
\a^` fcb` ZUg
t
#
"
&#
N# ' " E#
"
E
#
"
%
#
#
# &C EE
#
'# # $#C
#
F
#
# "
EC %
" #!
'
#
&#
"# E # '
F
O
'
#
General Service Administration
Federal Supply Service
Authorized Federal Supply Schedule Price List
On-line access to contract ordering information, terms, and conditions, up to date pricing, and the option to create an electronic delivery order are available through GSA Advantage!, a menu driven database system. The Internet address for GSA Advantage! Is www.GSAadvantage.gov Schedule FSC Group: 32V
Contract: GS-30F-014DA
Contract Period: To April 6, 2026
For more information on ordering from Federal Supply Schedules click FSS Schedules button at http://www.fss.gsa.gov
MIDWAY TRAILERS, INC.
2650 County Hwy 401 / PO Box 275
Benton, MO 63736
www.MOGreatDane.com
Jason Jones 573-545-3065
[email protected]
Business Size: Small Business
1a. Awarded Sin’s: 023-101, 190-05
2. Maximum Order: 023-101 - $1,000,000
3. Minimum Order: $100
4. Geographic Coverage: Domestic (48 States and DC). No delivery option for Alaska, Hawaii, or Puerto Rico.
5. Points of production: Nappanee, Indiana 46550
6. Discount from list prices: Prices shown are net government awarded discount.
7. Quantity Discounts: None
8. Prompt Payment Terms: 0% Net30
9a. Midway Trailers, Inc. will accept government purchase cards for orders below the micro-purchase threshold
9b. Midway Trailers, Inc. will accept government purchase cards for orders above the micropurchase threshold.
10. Foreign Items: N/A
11a. Time of Delivery: 60 to 120 days
11b. Expedited Delivery: Contact Midway Trailers, Inc.
11c. Overnight and 2 Day Delivery: Not Available
12. FOB Points: SIN 336212 (Old SIN # 023-101) = FOB Destination (48 States and DC) No delivery option for Alaska, Hawaii, or Puerto Rico. SIN 3361V = FOB Origin. 13a. Ordering Address: Midway Trailers, Inc. 2650 County Hwy 401/PO Box 275 Benton, MO 63736 13b. Ordering Procedures: For supplies and services, the ordering procedures, information on blanket purchase agreements (BPA’s) and a sample BPA can be found at the GSA/FSS schedule homepage
(www.fss.gsa.gov/schedules).
14. Payment Address: Midway Trailers, Inc. 2650 County Hwy 401/PO Box 275 Benton, MO 63736
15. Warranty Provisions: Standard Commercial Warranty
16. Export Packaging Charges: N/A
17. Terms and conditions of Government purchase card acceptance: $15,000 Maximum
18. Terms and conditions of rental, maintenance and repair: N/A
19. Terms and conditions of installation: N/A
20. Terms and conditions of repair parts indicating date of parts price list and any discounts from list prices: N/A
21. List of service and distribution points: N/A
22. List of participating dealers: N/A
23. Preventative Maintenance: N/A
24a. Special attributes such as environmental attributes: N/A 24b. Section 508 Compliance: N/A
25. Data Universal Number System (DUNS) number: 019652072
26. Notification regarding registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) database Vendor is registered and info is up to date.
BUYERS ORDER
REV 12/15
SIGNATURE
DEAL #:
DATE:
SALESMAN:
ALL USED TRAILERS ARE SOLD IN “AS IS” CONDITION, AND NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED IS MADE.
THE EXPRESS WARRANTY OF GREAT DANE TRAILERS, INC., IN RESPECT TO THE GOODS DESCRIBED HEREIN IS IN LIEU OF ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. NO IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY IS MADE AND THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES WHICH EXTEND BEYOND THE DESCRIPTION ON THE FACE HEREOF.
Stock#: ORDER-1 VIN: 2023 DIAMOND CARGO Price: $149,900.00 Pinnacle Hygienic Series Standard Premium Mattress x 10 $7,979.00 SHIPPING TO RICHMOND, CA $9,900.00
Per Unit: $167,779.00
Net Total $167,779.00
BUYERS ORDER
REV 12/15
SIGNATURE
DEAL #:
DATE:
SALESMAN:
ALL USED TRAILERS ARE SOLD IN “AS IS” CONDITION, AND NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED IS MADE.
THE EXPRESS WARRANTY OF GREAT DANE TRAILERS, INC., IN RESPECT TO THE GOODS DESCRIBED HEREIN IS IN LIEU OF ANY AND ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. NO IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY IS MADE AND THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES WHICH EXTEND BEYOND THE DESCRIPTION ON THE FACE HEREOF.
NEW TRAILER ORDER - 12-16 WEEKS
P.O REQURED BY 12/1/22 TO SECURE TIMELINE
2023 MGD 10 Person Bunk House Specialty Trailer
100"W
90" Ceiling
Aluminum Construction walls/floor/roof wall studs
8" 7 Gauge Steel E-Coated Chassis
(4) 30" Manual Stabilizer Jacks
(3) 7k torsion axles
R7 Wall & Floor Insulation
R14 Floor Insulation
Seamless Gelcoat exterior
All weather roof coating
(10) 30"W x 78" T Entry doors w/windows
Group 27 12V battery
Converter
LED Exterior Lights
Porch lights each door
LED lights per bunk room
Receptacles each room including usb recept by beds
Coin rubber floor
White fiberglass walls & ceiling
Each room has flip down countertop, 2 coat hooks, folding chairs, individual A/C unit, individual heater, smoke detector, fire ext. floor drains
TERMS AND CONDITIONS
IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED:
This purchase and the performance of the parƟes thereunder shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Missouri.
Buyer acknowledges receipt of the customer’s copy of this order fully completed at the Ɵme of its execuƟon by customer.
If Buyer pays the balance due Seller with a check and the check subsequently is dishonored due to insufficient funds or by stop‐payment of Buyer, then Buyer agrees that Seller has immediate right to possession of equipment upon demand and shall make such equipment available to Seller at Seller’s place of business or another locaƟon agreed upon by Buyer and Seller.
1. CANCELLATION— If Buyer refuses to accept and promptly pay for equipment in full as provided in this order, or if Buyer cancels this order prior to delivery, Buyer agrees that Seller would suffer financial loss and damage thereby; in such case Buyer agrees that Seller has opƟon to claim as his damages either: (a) ten (10) percent of the contract price of the equipment as liquidated damages or; (b) the actual damages (including loss of profit on the enƟre transacƟon) in lieu of liquidated damages; (c) the Buyer is enƟtled to a credit against damages computed by either method a or b above, the credit to include the cash deposit, if any, and credit for the value of any trade‐in equipment. If the credit given to Buyer exceeds the damages computed under a or b above, a refund would be due Buyer.
2. That the purchaser, before or at Ɵme of delivery to him of the vehicle covered by Purchase contract, will execute such other forms of agreements or documents as may reasonably be required by the Dealer.
3. If the Manufacturer makes any changes in the model or design of any accessories and/or parts of any new vehicles at any Ɵme, it does not create any obligaƟon on the part of the Dealer to make corresponding changes in the vehicle covered by this order either before or subsequent to the delivery of such vehicle to the Purchaser.
4. TRADE‐INS—The Buyer warrants that the equipment, if any, to be transferred to Seller (the “trade‐ins”) in part payment of the purchase price for the equipment to be purchased from Seller hereunder is free from all liens, claims and encumbrances and that Buyer has good marketable Ɵtle thereto and full right to transfer same, except as noted on the face of the order and that descripƟon of same given in this order is true and accurate in all respects including but not limited to make, year, model and serial number. Buyer shall deliver such trades to Seller as specified on the face of the order — the trade‐ins to be transferred on or before delivery of the equipment purchased hereunder in the same condiƟon or appearance as at the Ɵme of inspecƟon by Seller. Seller may refuse delivery of the trade‐in if, in its discreƟon, the condiƟon or appearance of the trade‐in has deteriorated or has changed since the original inspecƟon and Seller may require Buyer to make immediate payment, in cash, of the amount otherwise specified on the face of this order as trade‐in allowance. If the trade‐in is not delivered to Seller as set forth above on or before delivery of equipment purchased hereunder, Seller may charge Buyer rental fee which would be at a rate normally used and customary for such equipment. Trade‐ins not available at Ɵme of delivery shall be delivered to Seller at Customer’s expense.
5. Any increase in price, to a retail customer, aŌer having accepted an order of purchase or a contract from a buyer, is prohibited except that (a) a trade‐in vehicle may be reappraised if it subsequently suffered damage, or parts and/or accessories have been removed or replaced, or (b) as provided in (6) following.
6. The Purchaser hereby agrees to accept delivery of the ordered vehicle prior to the specified delivery date if the vehicle is available for delivery by the Dealer prior to the specified delivery date.
7. The dealer shall not be liable to the Buyer for any consequenƟal damages, damages to property, damages for loss of use, lost of Ɵme, loss of profits, or income, or any other incidental damages arising out of the sale or use of purchased vehicle.
8. Except for any manufacturer’s or other express warranty which exists on this vehicle, the enƟre risk as to the quality and performance of the vehicle is with the buyer, and should the vehicle prove defecƟve following the purchase, the Buyer will assume the enƟre cost of all servicing and repair, specifically but not limited to Ɵres and refrigeraƟon unit.
9. The dealer is not a party to any manufacturer’s or other third party warranty applicable to the vehicle but may be a representaƟve for the purposes of services or repairs under such warranty.
10. No oral representaƟons are binding unless wriƩen on this form and all terms of the agreement are printed or wriƩen herein.
Buyer’s RepresentaƟons: I agree to the terms and condiƟons the same is if it were printed above my signature. In consideraƟon of the mutual agreements of the parƟes herein I represent and warrant, “(a) that I am 18 years of age or older, (b) that I have full power, right and lawful authority to dispose of the vehicle to be traded in, (c) that I will defend same against all claims and that it is free from all liens and encumbrances except
11. THE REFRIGERATION UNIT DESCRIBED ON THIS CONTRACT MAY NOT BE THE SAME AGE AS THE TRAILER.
12. The Dealer’s obligaƟon to deliver the ordered vehicle to the purchaser is expressly condiƟoned upon the manufacturer delivering the vehicle to the dealer.
BUYER SIGNATURE DATE
Pinnacle Hygienic Series Premium Mattress
No inner springs - 2 solid foam
core options
Fire retardant - tested to stringent
standards
Derby’s cover fabric acts as a virus
barrier- anti-odor
Cover will not crack - warranty
against cracking
Free patch kits available for
accidental punctures
Optional integrated
memory foam topper
provides added comfort
Standard single
density foam core
24350 State Road 23 South South Bend, Indiana 46614 email: [email protected] fax: 1.574.288.4550 Call today
toll free
www.derbyindustries.com
from Derby Industries
1.866.233.4500
Proudly Made in the USA
Derby Industries
The ideal solution
for your firehouse
Pinnacle Hygienic Series
Premium Mattress
100%
Sealed Seams
Comfortable, durable mattresses
Perfect for hot bunking situations
Easily cleaned and sanitized
with a bleach solution
Unlike many sewn mattresses,
the Derby Pinnacle won’t give bedbugs
a place to hide!
Zero stitching
RF Welded seams
combined with Derby’s
high performance cover
material create a fluid
resistant mattress that
will not crack
2.52.330 - Piggyback procurement.
(a) Scope. The Purchasing Manager may arrange for the City to enter purchase contracts with a supplier or contractor for the purchase of supplies and services, including but not limited to, materials, equipment, vehicles, and apparatus, the pricing and terms of which have been previously established by another public agency (city, state, federal, school district, or other public entity, League of California Cities, California Communities Program, or other nonprofit association or group consisting of governmental entities), provided that:
(1) The Purchasing Manager determines that a "piggyback" purchase is in the City's best interest because an unusual or unique situation exists that makes the application of the City's requirements of competitive sealed bidding and competitive sealed proposals contrary to the public interest;
(2) The purchase request has been reviewed by the Purchasing Manager and it has been determined that there are no local suppliers or contractors who could provide the product or service at competitive rates;
(3) A copy of the solicitation has been obtained from the originating agency and reviewed for compliance with the City's purchasing ordinance;
(4) A written documentation has been made of a thorough investigation of the current market and determination that the originating agency's' solicitation is the most advantageous; (5) The specifications of the item or service required by the City are not materially different from those originally specified in the originating agency's solicitation; (6) The price of the purchase is lower than that estimated for the purchase if made directly by the City pursuant to this chapter;
(7) The price of the purchase is within fifteen percent (15%) or $2,500 of the originating agency's solicitation;
(8) The contract resulting from the original solicitation is current or the solicitation is within thirty-six (36) months from the date of the City's order, or written justification is provided justifying use of an older solicitation; and
(9) The City enters a separate contract with the vendor selected by the originating agency, and incorporates by reference, the original solicitation, terms, conditions, and prices. (b) Contract Approval. The City Council shall approve contracts in excess of $10,000, and the City Manager shall approve contracts of $10,000 or less.
December 20, 2022
Public Works
DATE: December 20, 2022
TO: Mayor Butt and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, Director of Public Works
Patrick Phelan, Infrastructure Administrator
Subject: One Bay Area Grant 3 (OBAG 3) Applications for Bayview-to-BART and McBryde Ave Safe Routes to
Parks Projects
FINANCIAL IMPACT: No impact to the General Fund. A local match of at least
11.47 percent is required. The Bayview project match is $229,419 and McBryde is $140,899. Local match will
come from Measure J funds and the Public Works paving
program.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:
None
STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:
City staff submitted two applications to the One Bay Area Grant 3 (OBAG 3) grant fund in the Active Transportation and Safety category. Proposed projects are “Bayview-toBART” and “McBryde Ave Complete Streets.” RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT resolutions authorizing the filing of applications for funding assigned to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), committing any necessary matching
funds, and stating assurance to complete the project –
Public Works (Daniel Chavarria/Patrick Phelan 510-307-
8111).
AGENDA
REPORT
December 20, 2022
DISCUSSION:
The One Bay Area Grant (OBAG), now in its third iteration, guides how the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) distributes federal transportation funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) to projects and programs that improve safety, spur economic development, and help the Bay Area meet climate change and air quality improvement goals. The third round of OBAG was adopted by the MTC in January 2022 and includes more than $750 million in federal funding for projects from Fiscal Year 2022-2023 to Fiscal Year 2025-2026. The OBAG 3 County and Local Program is managed by MTC in partnership with the nine Bay Area Country Transportation Agencies.
Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) is responsible for developing and submitting a prioritized countywide project nomination list to MTC. Contra Costa County is estimated to receive $47.3 million in OBAG 3 funding between 2023-2026. Contra Costa is focusing efforts around encouraging active transportation like bicycling and walking, supporting safe routes to schools, implementing complete streets, and upgrading our countywide traffic signal system to ‘smarter’ signals that can prioritize transit and emergency vehicles and help improve safety for people walking/biking at intersections.
City staff worked with neighborhood groups and the Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee to develop two projects that fit the metrics and scoring criteria of the grant while also capitalizing on existing and planned roadway improvements. The applications included Letters of Support from Caltrans, East Bay Regional Park District, Groundwork Richmond, Rich City Rides, East Richmond Neighborhood Council, County Supervisor John Gioia, City of El Cerrito, City of San Pablo, Trails for Richmond Action Committee, AC Transit, and Bike East Bay. Both Richmond projects were nominated by CCTA for funding.
The Bayview-to-BART project will create a safe and comfortable walking and biking route connecting the Del Norte BART station to the San Francisco Bay Trail. It capitalizes on existing multi-use paths, ties into El Cerrito’s Transit Oriented Development Complete Streets Project and will improve conditions around parks and schools. The project will build Class II bike lanes on Potrero Avenue (using designs drafted by City staff for a previous unfunded project) as well as build Class IV protected bike lanes on the Bayview Avenue overpass over I-580 (using a design funded by MTC). ADA-compliant curb ramps, sidewalk repairs, pavement rehabilitation, and street trees will be included throughout the project.
The McBryde Ave Safe Routes to Parks project will create a safe and comfortable walking and biking route from an existing bike route on 37th Street, through the San Pablo Ave Planned Development Area (PDA), and across I-80 to Wildcat Canyon Regional Park. Improvements include resurfacing, a road diet from four (4) to two (2) vehicle lanes with a center turn lane and bike lanes, traffic signal modifications, curb
December 20, 2022
ramps, curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks, sidewalk gap closures, traffic calming, and street trees. Scheduled paving of McBryde Avenue will make up part of the local match.
A resolution of local support, using a pre-established template, is a requirement of the grant application process and needs to be completed by the end of 2022.
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
Attachment 1 – Resolution for Bayview
Attachment 2 – Resolution for McBryde
Attachment 3 – Bayview-to-BART project documents
Attachment 4 – McBryde Ave Safe Routes to Parks project documents
Reso. No. xx-21
RESOLUTION NO. xx-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING
ASSIGNED TO MTC AND COMMITTING ANY NECESSARY MATCHING FUNDS
AND STATING ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Richmond(herein referred to as APPLICANT) is submitting an application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for $1,674,702.81 in funding assigned to MTC for programming discretion, which includes federal funding administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and federal or state funding administered by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) such as Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STP) funding, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) funding, Transportation Alternatives (TA) set-aside/Active Transportation Program (ATP) funding, and Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) funding (herein collectively referred to as REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING) for the Bayview-to-BART Project (herein referred to as PROJECT) for the One Bay Area Grant County & Local Program (herein referred to as PROGRAM); and
WHEREAS, the United States Congress from time to time enacts and amends legislation to provide funding for various transportation needs and programs, (collectively, the FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT) including, but not limited to the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STP) (23 U.S.C. § 133), the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) (23 U.S.C. § 149) and the Transportation Alternatives (TA) setaside (23 U.S.C. § 133); and WHEREAS, state statutes, including California Streets and Highways Code §182.6, §182.7, and §2381(a)(1), and California Government Code §14527, provide various funding programs for the programming discretion of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT, and any regulations promulgated thereunder, eligible project sponsors wishing to receive federal or state funds for a regionally-significant project shall submit an application first with the appropriate MPO, or RTPA, as applicable, for review and inclusion in the federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and
WHEREAS, MTC is the MPO and RTPA for the nine counties of the San Francisco Bay region; and
WHEREAS, MTC has adopted a Regional Project Funding Delivery Policy (MTC Resolution No. 3606, revised) that sets out procedures governing the application and use of REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and
WHEREAS, APPLICANT is an eligible sponsor for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and
WHEREAS, as part of the application for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING, MTC requires a resolution adopted by the responsible implementing agency stating the following:
the commitment of any required matching funds; and
that the sponsor understands that the REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING is fixed at the programmed amount, and therefore any cost increase cannot be expected to be funded with additional REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and that the PROJECT will comply with the procedures, delivery milestones and funding deadlines specified in the Regional Project Funding Delivery Policy (MTC Resolution No. 3606, revised); and
the assurance of the sponsor to complete the PROJECT as described in the application, subject to environmental clearance, and if approved, as included in MTC's federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and
Reso. No. xx-21
that the PROJECT will have adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the PROJECT within the schedule submitted with the project application; and that the PROJECT will comply with all project-specific requirements as set forth in the PROGRAM; and
that APPLICANT has assigned, and will maintain a single point of contact for all FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation projects to coordinate within the agency and with the respective Congestion Management Agency (CMA), MTC, Caltrans, FHWA, and CTC on all communications, inquires or issues that may arise during the federal programming and delivery process for all FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation and transit projects implemented by APPLICANT; and
WHEREAS, that APPLICANT is authorized to submit an application for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, there is no legal impediment to APPLICANT making applications for the funds; and
WHEREAS, there is no pending or threatened litigation that might in any way adversely affect the proposed PROJECT, or the ability of APPLICANT to deliver such PROJECT; and WHEREAS, APPLICANT authorizes its Executive Director, General Manager, or designee to execute and file an application with MTC for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT as referenced in this resolution; and WHEREAS, MTC requires that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the MTC in conjunction with the filing of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the APPLICANT is authorized to execute and file an application for funding for the PROJECT for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING under the FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT or continued funding; and be it further
RESOLVED that APPLICANT will provide any required matching funds; and be it further
RESOLVED that APPLICANT understands that the REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the project is fixed at the MTC approved programmed amount, and that any cost increases must be funded by the APPLICANT from other funds, and that APPLICANT does not expect any cost increases to be funded with additional REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and be it further
RESOLVED that APPLICANT understands the funding deadlines associated with these funds and will comply with the provisions and requirements of the Regional Project Funding Delivery Policy (MTC Resolution No. 3606, revised) and APPLICANT has, and will retain the expertise, knowledge and resources necessary to deliver federally-funded transportation and transit projects, and has assigned, and will maintain a single point of contact for all FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation projects to coordinate within the agency and with the respective Congestion Management Agency (CMA), MTC, Caltrans, FHWA, and CTC on all communications, inquires or issues that may arise during the federal programming and delivery process for all FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation and transit projects implemented by APPLICANT; and be it further
RESOLVED that PROJECT will be implemented as described in the complete application and in this resolution, subject to environmental clearance, and, if approved, for the amount approved by MTC and programmed in the federal TIP; and be it further RESOLVED that APPLICANT has reviewed the PROJECT and has adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the PROJECT within the schedule submitted with the project application; and be it further
RESOLVED that PROJECT will comply with the requirements as set forth in MTC programming guidelines and project selection procedures for the PROGRAM; and be it further
Reso. No. xx-21
RESOLVED that, in the case of a transit project, APPLICANT agrees to comply with the requirements of MTC’s Transit Coordination Implementation Plan as set forth in MTC Resolution No. 3866, revised; and be it further
RESOLVED that, in the case of a highway project, APPLICANT agrees to comply with the requirements of MTC’s Traffic Operations System (TOS) Policy as set forth in MTC Resolution No. 4104; and be it further
RESOLVED that, in the case of an RTIP project, PROJECT is included in a local congestion management plan, or is consistent with the capital improvement program adopted pursuant to MTC’s funding agreement with the countywide transportation agency; and be it further
RESOLVED that APPLICANT is an eligible sponsor of REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING funded projects; and be it further RESOLVED that APPLICANT is authorized to submit an application for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT; and be it further RESOLVED that there is no legal impediment to APPLICANT making applications for the funds; and be it further
RESOLVED that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might in any way adversely affect the proposed PROJECT, or the ability of APPLICANT to deliver such PROJECT; and be it further
RESOLVED that APPLICANT authorizes its Executive Director, General Manager, City Manager, or designee to execute and file an application with MTC for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT as referenced in this resolution; and be it further
RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution will be transmitted to the MTC in conjunction with the filing of the application; and be it further
RESOLVED that the MTC is requested to support the application for the PROJECT described in the resolution, and if approved, to include the PROJECT in MTC's federal TIP upon submittal by the project sponsor for TIP programming.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council finds the above recitals are true and correct and have served, together with the Agenda Report, as the basis for the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council designates the City Clerk as the custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision herein is based. These documents may be found at the office of the City Clerk at the Richmond City Hall, 450 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, California 94804. *************************
I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held December 20, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
Reso. No. xx-21
ABSENT:
CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:
Mayor
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
Reso. No. xx-22
RESOLUTION NO. xx-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING
ASSIGNED TO MTC AND COMMITTING ANY NECESSARY MATCHING FUNDS
AND STATING ASSURANCE TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Richmond(herein referred to as APPLICANT) is submitting an application to the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for $1,027,947 in funding assigned to MTC for programming discretion, which includes federal funding administered by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and federal or state funding administered by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) such as Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STP) funding, Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) funding, Transportation Alternatives (TA) set-aside/Active Transportation Program (ATP) funding, and Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) funding (herein collectively referred to as REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING) for the McBryde Ave Safe Routes to Parks Project (herein referred to as PROJECT) for the One Bay Area Grant County & Local Program (herein referred to as PROGRAM); and
WHEREAS, the United States Congress from time to time enacts and amends legislation to provide funding for various transportation needs and programs, (collectively, the FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT) including, but not limited to the Surface Transportation Block Grant Program (STP) (23 U.S.C. § 133), the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program (CMAQ) (23 U.S.C. § 149) and the Transportation Alternatives (TA) setaside (23 U.S.C. § 133); and WHEREAS, state statutes, including California Streets and Highways Code §182.6, §182.7, and §2381(a)(1), and California Government Code §14527, provide various funding programs for the programming discretion of the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) and the Regional Transportation Planning Agency (RTPA); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT, and any regulations promulgated thereunder, eligible project sponsors wishing to receive federal or state funds for a regionally-significant project shall submit an application first with the appropriate MPO, or RTPA, as applicable, for review and inclusion in the federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and
WHEREAS, MTC is the MPO and RTPA for the nine counties of the San Francisco Bay region; and
WHEREAS, MTC has adopted a Regional Project Funding Delivery Policy (MTC Resolution No. 3606, revised) that sets out procedures governing the application and use of REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and
WHEREAS, APPLICANT is an eligible sponsor for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and
WHEREAS, as part of the application for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING, MTC requires a resolution adopted by the responsible implementing agency stating the following:
the commitment of any required matching funds; and
that the sponsor understands that the REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING is fixed at the programmed amount, and therefore any cost increase cannot be expected to be funded with additional REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and that the PROJECT will comply with the procedures, delivery milestones and funding deadlines specified in the Regional Project Funding Delivery Policy (MTC Resolution No. 3606, revised); and
the assurance of the sponsor to complete the PROJECT as described in the application, subject to environmental clearance, and if approved, as included in MTC's federal Transportation Improvement Program (TIP); and
Reso. No. xx-22
that the PROJECT will have adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the PROJECT within the schedule submitted with the project application; and that the PROJECT will comply with all project-specific requirements as set forth in the PROGRAM; and
that APPLICANT has assigned, and will maintain a single point of contact for all FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation projects to coordinate within the agency and with the respective Congestion Management Agency (CMA), MTC, Caltrans, FHWA, and CTC on all communications, inquires or issues that may arise during the federal programming and delivery process for all FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation and transit projects implemented by APPLICANT; and
WHEREAS, that APPLICANT is authorized to submit an application for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT; and
WHEREAS, there is no legal impediment to APPLICANT making applications for the funds; and
WHEREAS, there is no pending or threatened litigation that might in any way adversely affect the proposed PROJECT, or the ability of APPLICANT to deliver such PROJECT; and WHEREAS, APPLICANT authorizes its Executive Director, General Manager, or designee to execute and file an application with MTC for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT as referenced in this resolution; and WHEREAS, MTC requires that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the MTC in conjunction with the filing of the application.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the APPLICANT is authorized to execute and file an application for funding for the PROJECT for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING under the FEDERAL TRANSPORTATION ACT or continued funding; and be it further
RESOLVED that APPLICANT will provide any required matching funds; and be it further
RESOLVED that APPLICANT understands that the REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the project is fixed at the MTC approved programmed amount, and that any cost increases must be funded by the APPLICANT from other funds, and that APPLICANT does not expect any cost increases to be funded with additional REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING; and be it further
RESOLVED that APPLICANT understands the funding deadlines associated with these funds and will comply with the provisions and requirements of the Regional Project Funding Delivery Policy (MTC Resolution No. 3606, revised) and APPLICANT has, and will retain the expertise, knowledge and resources necessary to deliver federally-funded transportation and transit projects, and has assigned, and will maintain a single point of contact for all FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation projects to coordinate within the agency and with the respective Congestion Management Agency (CMA), MTC, Caltrans, FHWA, and CTC on all communications, inquires or issues that may arise during the federal programming and delivery process for all FHWA- and CTC-funded transportation and transit projects implemented by APPLICANT; and be it further
RESOLVED that PROJECT will be implemented as described in the complete application and in this resolution, subject to environmental clearance, and, if approved, for the amount approved by MTC and programmed in the federal TIP; and be it further RESOLVED that APPLICANT has reviewed the PROJECT and has adequate staffing resources to deliver and complete the PROJECT within the schedule submitted with the project application; and be it further
RESOLVED that PROJECT will comply with the requirements as set forth in MTC programming guidelines and project selection procedures for the PROGRAM; and be it further
Reso. No. xx-22
RESOLVED that, in the case of a transit project, APPLICANT agrees to comply with the requirements of MTC’s Transit Coordination Implementation Plan as set forth in MTC Resolution No. 3866, revised; and be it further
RESOLVED that, in the case of a highway project, APPLICANT agrees to comply with the requirements of MTC’s Traffic Operations System (TOS) Policy as set forth in MTC Resolution No. 4104; and be it further
RESOLVED that, in the case of an RTIP project, PROJECT is included in a local congestion management plan, or is consistent with the capital improvement program adopted pursuant to MTC’s funding agreement with the countywide transportation agency; and be it further
RESOLVED that APPLICANT is an eligible sponsor of REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING funded projects; and be it further RESOLVED that APPLICANT is authorized to submit an application for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT; and be it further RESOLVED that there is no legal impediment to APPLICANT making applications for the funds; and be it further
RESOLVED that there is no pending or threatened litigation that might in any way adversely affect the proposed PROJECT, or the ability of APPLICANT to deliver such PROJECT; and be it further
RESOLVED that APPLICANT authorizes its Executive Director, General Manager, City Manager, or designee to execute and file an application with MTC for REGIONAL DISCRETIONARY FUNDING for the PROJECT as referenced in this resolution; and be it further
RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution will be transmitted to the MTC in conjunction with the filing of the application; and be it further
RESOLVED that the MTC is requested to support the application for the PROJECT described in the resolution, and if approved, to include the PROJECT in MTC's federal TIP upon submittal by the project sponsor for TIP programming.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council finds the above recitals are true and correct and have served, together with the Agenda Report, as the basis for the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council designates the City Clerk as the custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision herein is based. These documents may be found at the office of the City Clerk at the Richmond City Hall, 450 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, California 94804. *************************
I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held December 20, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
Reso. No. xx-22
ABSENT:
CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:
Mayor
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
MEASURE J PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Project Information Form
Project Name: Bayview to BART
Project Number: Enter Measure J Project No.
Proponent Name: City of Richmond
Please provide the following information:
1. Project Purpose and Need
Define the problem to be solved by the project, and how the proposed project will solve it.
Because the Bayview Ave overpass over I-580 has no bicycle facilities and substandard sidewalks, the freeway presents a barrier to non-vehicular mobility and makes accessing the Bay Trail and shoreline difficult for residents of southeast Richmond and adjacent parts of El Cerrito. The South Richmond Transportation Connectivity Plan, along with the Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan, highlight Bayview Ave, Ells St, Ells Lane path, and Cypress Path as the best route through the area to reach Potrero Ave to continue to San Pablo Ave and the El Cerrito Del Norte BART Station. Bicycle infrastructure is lacking, the existing bike/ped paths are in disrepair, and many curb ramps are missing.
The entire area is an equity priority community and the corridor runs along parks and schools.
2. Project Description
Clearly define the proposed project, including how the needs of bicyclists, pedestrians and transit users are met, consistent with agency policies.
Measure J Peer Review Process
Project Information Form
Project Name: McBryde Ave Safe Routes to Parks
The project corridor starts at the Bay Trail access point at the south end of S 51st St. S 51st St will receive Bicycle Boulevard treatment with pavement markings, signage, and traffic calming. From there, the Bayview Ave overpass crosses I-580 and carries two 12 ft vehicle lanes in each direction with an 8 to 9 ft shoulder. The shoulder will be converted to a 6 ft bike lane with 2-3 ft buffer with soft hit bollards and curb stops/armadillos. The physical protection of the bike lane will add to the safety of the existing sidewalk on the south side of the overpass, and two locations of significant sidewalk damage will be repaired. On the east side of the freeway, Bayview crosses Carlson Blvd which will receive quick-build protected intersection treatments and the protected or buffered bike lanes will continue on Bayview to Ells St. Ells St will be another bike blvd with stormwater planter bulb-outs at the intersection with Gately Ave. At the north end of Ells St, an existing bike/ped path continues north to Cypress Ave, this path will be repaired and resurfaced. Portions of Cypress Ave, S 47th St, and S 49th St will receive bike blvd treatments. Cypress Path will be widened from 5 ft to 8-10 ft. The City of Richmond has a completed bike lane striping plan for Potrero Ave which this grant will implement. East of S 52nd St is the city limit with El Cerrito, where bike lanes have already been striped. Continuing under I-80 brings you to Eastshore Blvd, where El Cerrito’s Del Norte TOD Complete Streets project will build protected bike lanes that will take you to the Del Norte BART station. Throughout the project all curb ramps will be built or upgraded and over 100 street trees installed in vacant tree wells and in sidewalk planter strips.
3. Project Schedule
Provide Beginning and completion dates for the following activities:
Item Beginning Date Completion Date
Environmental Document 1/2023 12/2023
Final Design stages
Phase 1 (65% Design) 4/2024 9/2024
Measure J Peer Review Process
Project Information Form
Project Name: McBryde Ave Safe Routes to Parks
Phase 2 (90% Design) 10/2024 4/2025
Final Design
Right‐of‐way Engineering and Acquisition 5/2025 4/2026
Utility Relocation 5/2025 4/2026
Construction 5/2026 10/2026
4. Financial Plan
Please attach financial plan that lists proposed funding sources and amounts, including any shortfalls and potential revenue sources to address anticipated shortfalls.
5. Summary Responses
Provide responses to issues raised by Authority representatives or the CCEAC peers in previous reviews (if applicable).
Enter text here
450 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, CA 94804-1630
Telephone: (510) 307-8091 Fax: (510) 307-8116 www.ci.richmond.ca.us
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
July 15, 2022
Colin B. Clarke, AICP
Associate Transportation Planner, Planning Department
Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA)
2999 Oak Road, Suite 100, Walnut Creek, CA 94597
City of Richmond’s OBAG3 grant application for the Bayview to BART Project Dear Mr. Clarke,
Please find the attachments to our application which includes project maps, budget, plan references, and letters of support.
The project will create a safe and comfortable walking and biking route connecting the Del Norte BART station to the San Francisco Bay Trail. It capitalizes on existing multi-use paths, ties into El Cerrito’s Transit Oriented Development Complete Streets Project, and will improve conditions around parks and schools. The project will build Class 2 bike lanes on Potrero Ave as well as build Class 4 protected bike lanes on the Bayview Ave overpass over I-580. Other improvements include resurfacing, ADA-compliant curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, sidewalk and path repairs, traffic calming, street trees, and stormwater planters. The project serves an Equity Priority Community and is supported by a number of organizations and agencies.
The total project cost is $1,904,121.54 of which we are requesting $1,674,702.81 in OBAG3 funds.
Several of the Letters of Support have just a signature on a second page, so we hope you will accept over 20 pages of attachments in a good faith effort.
Sincerely,
Patrick Phelan
Infrastructure Administrator
City of Richmond Public Works
510-307-8111
[email protected]
El Cerrito Del Norte TOD
Complete Streets Project
Resurface Potrero Ave
Replace Sharrows
with Bike Lanes
Build Bicycle Boulevards
With Traffic Calming
Install ADA-Compliant Curb Ramps
Throughout Project
Repair & Improve
Existing Paths
Build Bicycle Boulevard
With Traffic Calming
Install Buffered
or Protected
Bike Lanes
Install Protected Bike Lanes
on I-580 Overpass
Bay Trail Access
SOUTH RICHMOND PDA
SAN PABLO
AVENUE
CORRIDOR
PDA
580
80 BOOKER T
ANDERSON
JR PARK
CRESCENT
PARK
BAYVIEW
BRANCH
El C
errito
Ric
h
m
o
n
d
KENNEDY
HIGH
SCHOOL
STEGE
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
EL CERRITO
DEL NORTE
SOUTHWEST
RICHMOND
ANNEX
PARKVIEW
EASTSHORE
RICHMOND
ANNEX
PANHANDLE
ANNEX
LAUREL PARK
PARK
PLAZA
CORTEZ/STEGE
MARINA
BAY
B
N
S
F
UNION PACIFIC
BNSF
AT & SF
SPT CO
S
51ST
ST
BAYVIEW AVE
S 47TH ST
POTRERO AVE
CYPRESS AVE
E
L
L
S
S
T
E
L
L
S
L
N
CARLSON BLVD
SAN
PABLO AVE
CUTTING BLVD
S
48TH
ST
MEADE ST
HARTNETT
AVE
S 55T
H
S
T
S 45TH ST
S 56T
H
S
T
E MONTGOMERY AVE
SEAPORT AVE
BERK AVE
EGRET WAY
FLEMING AVE
EA
S
T
S
H
O
RE BLV
D
BERK PL
SANTA CLARA ST
FALL AVE
S 46TH ST
CASTILLA AVE
NUNNST
CARL AVE
SAN JOAQUIN ST
S 41S
T
S
T
C
A
MPBELL S
T
HILL ST
FALLON AVE
JAYWAY
ROBIN DR
MONTEREY ST
STATE CT
REID CT
ARNO CT
S
50TH
ST
S
49TH
ST
FRAY AVE
CREELY AVE
GATELY AVE
MARIPOSA ST
EXIT 15
STATE AVE
EXIT
11 0 0.06 0.12
Miles
1 Inch = 600 Feet
New Trees
City Limits
Existing Bikeways
Class 1 Path
Class 2 Lane
Class 3 Sharrow
ADA Compliant
Needs Detectable Warning Surface
Build Curb Ramp
Rebuild Non-Compliant Ramp
Potential Stormwater Planter
Priority Development Area
BAYVIEW TO BART PROJECT
This project idea envisions a safe
and comfortable walking and
biking route connecting the Del
Norte BART station to the Bay
Trail. It capitalizes on existing
multi-use paths, ties into El
Cerrito's Transit Oriented
Development Complete Streets
Project, improves conditions
around parks and schools, and
implements elements of the
South Richmond Transportation
Connectivity Plan.
PROJECT LOCATION
R I C H M O N D
EL CERRITO
80 580
EL CERRITO
DEL NORTE
BOOKER T
ANDERSON
JR PARK
CUTTING BLVD
S 37TH ST
BLAKE ST
HUNTINGTON AVE
S 48TH
ST
MEADE ST
KNOTT AVE
CARLSON BLVD
GATTO AVE
S 47TH ST
S 49TH ST
HILL ST
S 35TH ST
HARTNETT AVE
S 43RD ST
S 55TH ST
S 36TH ST
S 45TH ST
S 41ST ST BERK AVE
S 39TH ST
VICTOR AVE
E MONTGOMERY AVE
SOUTH ST
SEAPORT AVE
ROBIN DR
POINT ISABEL REGIONAL SHORELINE TRL
JULIGA WOODS ST
ELM
ST
FLEMING AVE
S 34THST
LARK DR
EASTSHORE BLVD
KEY BLV
O
D
HLONE
TRL
S 59TH ST
SAN
MATEO ST
AVOCETWAY
JEFFERSON AVE
EGRET
WAY
GLEN MAWR AVE
SNOWDON AVE
HIGHLAND AVE
TEHAMA AVE
CYPRESS AVE
P L AZA C RI
SAN JOAQUIN ST
MONTEREY ST
HERONDR
OSCAR ST
ALAMEDAAVE
MERCED ST
S 52ND ST
HAGEN BLVD
MADISON AVE
S 56TH ST
WALNUT ST
WALLAVE
S 42ND ST
CARLOS AVE
BURLINGAME AVE
SANTA CRUZ AVE
SANTA CLARAST
SAN LUIS
ST
KEARNEY
ST
S 46TH ST
S 51ST ST
S 33RD ST
NUNN ST
CARLAVE
S 53RD ST
BERK PL
IMPERIAL AVE
JUNCTION AVE
TAPSCOTTAVE
FLORIDA AVE
MENDOCINO ST
OVEREND AVE
S 57TH ST
ELLS ST
CAMPBELL ST
HARPER ST
SUTTER AVE
FALLON AVE
SCH O OL
REID CT
AR NO CT
OWL WAY
POINT ISABEL CT
S 50TH
ST
REGATTA BLVD
LIBERTY ST
CENTER AVE
WREN DR
DOWNEY PL
WALLER AVE
FRAYAVE
ELLS LN
CREELY AVE
CROW DR
SPRING ST
GATELYAVE
MARIPOSA ST
WENK AVE
BUTTE
ST
PLACER ST
SHASTA ST
EXIT 15
STATEAVE
LEXINGTON AVE
ORCHARD AVE
S 38TH ST
S 58TH ST
BELLAVE
STARLING WAY
STEGE AVE
EXIT 11
EXIT 10B
TAFTAVE
MANOR CIR
SAN
PABLO AV
POTRERO AVE
E
BAYVIEW
AVE
0 0.1 0.2
Miles
1 Inch = 1,000 Feet
BAYVIEW TO BART CONTEXT
Equity Priority Community
Priority Development Area
Transit-Rich Outside HRA
Parks/Public Areas
City Limits
AC Transit Bus Line
Proposed Bikeways
Existing Bikeways
Class 1 Path
Class 2 Lane
Class 3 Sharrow
City of Richmond
OBAG3 Grant Application
Bayview to BART Project Estimate
Item Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total Grant Ask Local Match Paving ‐ Ells St SF 5.00 $ 11000 55,000.00 $ 27,500.00 $ 27,500.00 $ Paving ‐ Bayview Ave SF 5.00 $ 22500 112,500.00 $ 56,250.00 $ 56,250.00 $ Paving ‐ Bayview Overpass LS 89,000.00 $ 44,500.00 $ 44,500.00 $ Slurry ‐ Potrero SF 0.50 $ 164000 82,000.00 $ 41,000.00 $ 41,000.00 $ Pavement Asphalt Concrete Repair SF 12.00 $ 235 2,820.00 $ 1,410.00 $ 1,410.00 $ Crack Seal (10% of slurry area) SF 0.15 $ 16400 2,460.00 $ 1,230.00 $ 1,230.00 $ Curb Ramp EA 7,000.00 $ 41 287,000.00 $ 287,000.00 $ ‐ $ Stormwater Planter EA 30.00 $ 675 20,250.00 $ 20,250.00 $ ‐ $ Street Tree EA 200.00 $ 118 23,600.00 $ 23,600.00 $ ‐ $ Sidewalk Repair SF 30.00 $ 1000 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ ‐ $ Bike/Ped Path Repair SF 25.00 $ 3000 75,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ ‐ $ Signage & Striping LS 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ ‐ $ Signal Improvements LS 100,000.00 $ 100,000.00 $ ‐ $ Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon LS 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ ‐ $ Subtotal 1,139,630.00 $ 967,740.00 $ 171,890.00 $ Construction Contingency LS 15% 170,944.50 $ 170,944.50 $ Construction Total 1,310,574.50 $ 1,138,684.50 $ 171,890.00 $ Environmental Documents LS 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 $ Staff Time LS 5% 65,528.73 $ 38,000.00 $ 27,528.73 $ Design LS 10% 131,057.45 $ 131,057.45 $ ‐ $ Mobilization LS 10% 131,057.45 $ 131,057.45 $ ‐ $ Construction Management LS 18% 235,903.41 $ 235,903.41 $ ‐ $ Grant Total $ 1,904,121.54 $ 1,674,702.81 $ 229,418.73 Local Share % 12.05%
* R3-8a
WAIT HERE
STOP STOP
STOP
STOP STOP
COVER SHEET OF DRAFT STRIPING PLAN
Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. | 10-51
BAYVIEW AVENUE
CORRIDOR OVERVIEW
Bayview Avenue is currently the primary multimodal connection to the South Shoreline Area (including the future site of the Richmond Bay Campus) from El Cerrito, including El Cerrito Del Norte BART and El Cerrito Plaza BART, and Richmond neighborhoods located east of I-580, including Eastshore, Park View, Richmond Annex, Southwest Annex, and the Panhandle Annex. To the west, Bayview Avenue originates immediately west of I-580 at the intersection of Seaport Avenue, South 51st Street and on/off-ramps
to/from eastbound I-580. A direct connection to the
Bay Trail can be made from a path extension of South
51st Street, starting one block south of Bayview. On the northeast side of the Bayview interchange, the primary
auto, truck, and transit connections to El Cerrito and
regional destinations to the south and east of South
Richmond can be made via Carlson Boulevard (These
connections are discussed further in the associated
Carlson Boulevard Corridor Profile). The focus of this
corridor profile is on the Bayview overpass of I-580,
and existing and potential pedestrian, bicycle and
transit connections to the El Cerrito Del Norte BART
Station.
EXISTING CONDITION
Bayview Overpass
From South 51st Street and Seaport Avenue, Bayview
Avenue rises to the south, then loops back to the
northeast, as it crosses I-580 and the UPRR tracks to an intersection with Carlson Boulevard. The center of the
overpass includes a signalized intersection with on and off-ramps from westbound I-580. The width of usable space on the overpass is approximately 85.’ This space is currently allocated – in typical cross-section – to two general purpose travel lanes in each direction, a center left turn lane in advance of the intersections with I-580 exit/entrance ramps (away from intersections, the center left turn lane is replaced by an unplanted median), wide shoulders (striped), and a narrow (~4’) sidewalk on the southeast side. New ADA accessible curb ramps have been installed at selected corners.
BAYVIEW AVENUE
Bay Trail,
Richmond Bay
Campus to
El Cerrito Del
Norte BART
Cutting
Potrero
Del Norte
BART
EXCERPT FROM SOUTH RICHMOND TRANSPORTATION CONNECTIVITY PLAN
Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. | 10-52
BAYVIEW AVENUE
At the southwestern approach to the intersection of
Bayview Avenue and Carlson Boulevard, Bayview
has a wider profile, with two southbound lanes and
three northbound lanes, including dedicated right
turn and left turn lanes, on either side of a lane
marked with straight and left turn arrows.
Challenges with the Bayview overpass and its
intersection with Carlson Boulevard include:
Wide lanes and wide corner turning radii
encourage high speed through travel and
turning movements in this corridor (Note:
the wide angle of the southwest corner of
Carlson Boulevard and Bayview Avenue
encourages high speed turns causing
potential conflicts with the through
movements of bicyclists and pedestrians
along Carlson Boulevard).
Sidewalks are only present on the
southeast side of the Bayview overpass and
are in a state of disrepair.
There are no dedicated bicycle facilities on
the Bayview overpass or on Bayview
Avenue east of Carlson Boulevard.
The design of the on-ramp to westbound I580 from south/west bound Bayview Avenue facilitates free right turns at high
speeds. This puts motor vehicles in
potential high speed conflict with
pedestrians and cyclists who may be
encouraged to use the wide shoulder
present on that side of the overpass,
despite the lack of a sidewalk or dedicated bike lane.
The location of a fire station on the northwest corner of the intersection of Bayview Avenue and Carlson Boulevard (with driveway access via Bayview Avenue) necessitates wider clearance and careful design of any intersection modifications.
Transit
Transit and shuttle services using segments of Bayview Avenue in this corridor include:
AC Transit Line 71, which deviates from the Carlson Blvd corridor, traveling on Bayview Ave for one block east to Hartnett Ave. From there, Line 71 follows Hartnett north and west to another intersection with Carlson Boulevard.
Bayview Avenue and Carlson Boulevard:
Curb ramps with tactile warning strip
Bayview Avenue and Carlson Boulevard:
Wide turning radius and sidewalk in disrepair
Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc. | 10-53
BAYVIEW AVENUE
The UC Berkeley Richmond Field Station Shuttle uses the Bayview Ave overpass to connect the Field Station to the main campus of UC Berkeley (via the I-580 on/off-ramps at Bayview), and to El Cerrito Plaza BART Station, via Bayview Ave, Carlson Boulevard, and Central Avenue.
Auto connections to El Cerrito
The primary alternative routes from the Bayview interchange to El Cerrito Del Norte BART are:
Carlson Boulevard to South 47th Street to Potrero Avenue (existing conditions and potential improvements for this corridor are covered in separate corridor profile sheets for Carlson, and South 47thPotrero Ave), and Bayview Avenue to South 55th Street (running north-south directly adjacent to I-80), to Potrero Avenue.
No transit or shuttle service currently makes this connection between the South Shoreline area and El Cerrito Del Norte BART Station.
Walking and bicycling via Ellis Lane and the Cypress Path From Bayview Avenue and Carlson, the most
direct, low-stress option for walking or cycling to
San Pablo Avenue and the El Cerrito Del Norte
BART Station is to proceed two blocks northeast on
Bayview Avenue, turn left on Ellis Lane, proceeding
for two blocks north to Fleming Avenue. Across
Fleming Ellis Lane continues as an off-street path,
for 950 ft. north along the east side of Booker T.
Anderson Park to Cypress Ave. The Cypress Path
begins just 60 ft. to the east on the north side of
Cypress Avenue and proceeds another 130 ft north
to Potrero Avenue, along the east side of the Stege
Elementary School campus. From there, bicyclists
and pedestrians can reach El Cerrito Del Norte
BART by following Potrero Avenue to the east,
under I-80, to Eastshore Boulevard, then turning
left to travel one block north to reach the station.
The Ellis Lane and Cypress Paths are good shortcuts within the neighborhood, presenting opportunities for low-stress bicycle and pedestrian
access to Stege Elementary School, Booker T.
Anderson Park and the Shoreline area, via Bayview.
However, these paths are narrow in places (6’-8’),
and do not meet standards for ADA access or class I
path status. The route also lacks wayfinding
signage or pavement markings that might
encourage its use for through transportation, rather
than exclusively for internal neighborhood
circulation.
Entrance to Ellis Lane Path from Ellis and Fleming
Missing curb ramps and wide corner turning radii,
Bayview and Ellis
Where sidewalks are present, these facilities are in
disrepair in selected locations and are not in all cases designed, built, or maintained in accordance with the
Public Right of Way Access Guidelines (PROWAG).
Most existing sidewalks within the Plan Area are located directly adjacent to the curb, with no sidewalk buffer
zone to cushion pedestrians from fast moving traffic.
Marked crosswalks are provided at a limited number
of intersections or crossings of higher volume arterial and connector streets within the Plan Area, including:
Marina Way South; Regatta Boulevard; Marina Bay
Parkway; South 51st Street.
With the exception of one mid-block crossing of Seaver
Avenue within the Richmond Bay Campus, all marked
crossings in the Plan Area are typical crosswalks with
lateral stripes, which can be hard for drivers to see.
Barriers to Connectivity
Discontinuity of the street and pedestrian network within the Plan Area is also the result of major travel barriers formed by the many railroads and arterial roadways that traverse and bound the district. Figure 2.3 highlights the most significant travel barriers within and adjacent to the Plan Area, along with key routes across such barriers for bicyclists, pedestrians and users of other modes of travel.
The following is a list of notable barriers.
• I-580, which forms the northern and eastern
boundaries of the Plan Area, is a barrier to connectivity with adjacent neighborhoods in the City of Richmond.
Pedestrian accessible overpasses exist only at Marina
Way South, Marina Bay Parkway and Bayview Avenue,
spaced 0.5 to 0.8 miles apart.
• An operational at-grade railroad line and a series of railyards traverse the northern half of the Plan Area
from east to west, limiting north-south travel for all
modes of transportation.
• With limited crossings, wide lanes and high travel
speeds, segments of major arterial and collector
roadways create barriers that effectively limit
pedestrian, bicycle and accessible circulation within
and to the Plan Area.
Figures 2.4-2.6 highlight the impacts of the barriers in and around the Plan Area on connectivity to commercial
areas, schools, and community amenities. The diagrams
show ¼ mile (5 minute) and ½ mile (10 minute) walking
radii.
Figure 2.3: Barriers to Connectivity Figure 2.4: Connectivity to Commercial Uses Figure 2.5: Connectivity to Community Facilities Figure 2.6: Connectivity to Schools Connectivity and Barriers/Edges
Findings:
Cutting Boulevard
Carlson Boulevard
Harbour Way South
Marina Way South
Interstate 580
Regatta Boulevard
Interstate 80
Marina Bay Pkwy
0 615 1230 ft
0 1/4 1/2 mile
July 2013
Opticos Design, Inc. 1 © 2013 Opticos Design, Inc.South Shoreline Specific Plan City of Richmond, California
Project Site Analysis
Connectivity and Barriers/Edges
Walkability to Community Destinations
Findings:
Booker T. Anderson
Community Center
Bayview Branch
Library
MLK Community
Center
Richmond Clinic
BAART/CDP
Shimada
Peace Park
Barb + Jay
Vincent Park
Sheridan Observation
Point Park
Lucretia
Edwards Park
Rosie the Riveter
Memorial Park
Boat House
Future WETA
Ferry Terminal
Craneway
Pavilion
Cutting Boulevard
Carlson Boulevard
Harbour Way South
Marina Way South
Interstate 580
Regatta Boulevard
Interstate 80
Marina Bay Pkwy
0 615 1230 ft
0 1/4 1/2 mile
July 2013
Opticos Design, Inc. 3 © 2013 Opticos Design, Inc.South Shoreline Specific Plan City of Richmond, California
Project Site Analysis
Walkability to Community Destinations
Walkability to Commercial Areas
Findings:
Cutting Boulevard
Carlson Boulevard
Harbour Way South
Marina Way South
Interstate 580
Regatta Boulevard
Interstate 80
Marina Bay Pkwy
0 615 1230 ft
0 1/4 1/2 mile
Opticos Design, Inc.
© 2013 Opticos Design, Inc.
South Shoreline Specific Plan
City of Richmond, California
Project Site Analysis
Walkability to Commercial Areas
ES
ES
ES
HS
ES
ES
ES
MS
ES
ES
ES
ES
HS
ES
ES
ES
ES
MS
ES
HS
ES
HS
ES
Walkability to Schools
Findings:
Cutting Boulevard
Carlson Boulevard
Harbour Way South
Marina Way South
Interstate 580
Regatta Boulevard
Interstate 80
Marina Bay Pkwy
0 615 1230 ft
0 1/4 1/2 mile
Opticos Design, Inc.
© 2013 Opticos Design, Inc.
South Shoreline Specific Plan
City of Richmond, California
Project Site Analysis
Walkability to Schools
Chapter 2: Background and Setting
Richmond Bay Specific Plan | 2-5
c. Provision for wide sidewalks on many corridors
so as to allow maximum space for necessary street
furniture and landscaping, both of which can serve
to buffer pedestrians from on-street traffic and
thereby enhance pedestrian comfort and safety.
5. Networks: Well connected street networks, with a
high density of intersections (such as the well defined street grid in Central Richmond) enhance multimodal
access, mobility and connectivity by providing
direct connections and choices. A high density of
intersections is also strongly related to lower rates of traffic and vehicle miles traveled (VMT). In a grid,
there is always more than one way to get somewhere,
reducing congestion and conflicts between modes.
This Plan’s focus on networks is reflected in the
Thoroughfare Regulating Plan (page 4-72), which
aligns new streets with the original street grid serving the current site of the Richmond Field Station, and
the adjacent Seaport neighborhood. These new streets
will bisect existing super-blocks in the Plan Area, and provide new multimodal connections across major
barriers to access, including I-580 and the Union
Pacific Railroad.
6. Prioritized Vulnerable, Low-Impact Road Users:
Since the risk of injury or fatality is highest for
collisions involving pedestrians, bicyclists, and
wheelchair users, and because travelers have the lowest environmental and climate impact and are cheapest
to accommodate when using these modes, this Plan
prioritizes safe and direct ways of access for these
modes.
7. Multimodal Gateways: The limited crossings of
I-580 at Marina Way South, Marina Bay Parkway,
Regatta Boulevard, Bayview Avenue and Central
Avenue serve as gateways to the Richmond Bay area
for people arriving by all modes of transportation
from the regional highway system, adjacent Richmond
neighborhoods, and nearby BART Stations. While
these streets legally accommodate all modes of
travel, most of the available right-of-way is dedicated to vehicular traffic. Sidewalks are narrow and
unbuffered from vehicle traffic and in some cases
provided on only one side of the street (e.g. Bayview
Avenue), while bicyclists are expected to share general purpose travel lanes, with no special accommodation.
Moreover, the design of these roadways increases
conflicts between pedestrians, bicyclists and motor
vehicles – particularly those taking so-called “free
right turns” at highway speeds, when using these
arterials to enter or exit I-580.
Fortunately, there is ample space within existing
public right-of-ways, including existing highway
overpass structures, to significantly improve safety
and mobility for all users, without substantially
impacting auto or freight mobility in these corridors.
A key focus of this Plan in the near-term is the costeffective re-design of these key gateway corridors, rebalancing the allocation of street space to better
accommodate bicycle and pedestrian travelers of all
ages and abilities, reduce speeding by motor vehicles,
and to reduce conflicts between users of all modes
of travel where highway exit and entrance ramps
intersect with these multimodal streets. Additional
separation between modes can be provided by
reducing the number of vehicle travel lanes, where
feasible.
8. Flexible Design: A key principle of this Specific
Plan is to design for flexibility of use. As the RBC
and nearby neighborhoods in the Plan Area begin
to develop, demand for access by all modes of travel
will increase substantially. In the long-term, vehicle
traffic can be expected to increase substantially on
each of the travel corridors accessing or providing
connections across I-580. For the most part, the
improvements recommended in the Plan are intended
to be flexible, low-cost measures that can achieve
desired objectives in the near-term, while maintaining
flexibility to return streets to their current vehicle
capacity, or to further refine the use of street space
in the future. Such measures include striping,
installation of temporary or movable curbs and
barriers and use of planter boxes and other temporary
measures to re-purpose street space and provide for
separation between modes. In addition to being costeffective in the near term, such temporary measures are quicker and easier to implement, and offer the
opportunity to test the impacts and effectiveness of
new street designs and channelization patterns, with
allowance for changes and upgrades as necessary.
9. Local Connectivity: Rather than expanding highway
interchanges, this plan calls for investment in existing and new multimodal corridors that cross I-580,
including:
a. Marina Way South, a key transit, bicycle and
pedestrian gateway to the Plan Area, and a primary
route from Central Richmond to the new Ferry
Terminal.
b. A multimodal bridge over I-580, Meade Street,
Carlson Boulevard, and the Union Pacific Railway,
providing a new, direct connection from the RBC
to the Eastshore and Park View neighborhoods
(and El Cerrito Del Norte BART beyond).
These projects provide local connections and
greater redundancy of route options in the area’s
transportation networks, while avoiding conflicts
Chapter 3: Plan Area Vision
Richmond Bay Specific Plan | 3-33
Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan 67
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
Figure 5-1 High Need + High Potential Active Transportation Recommendations ADA Upgrade Area
Pedestrian Facility or
Upgrade
Bicycle Facility or
Upgrade
Richmond Pkwy
Rumrill Blvd 22nd St
Nicholl Park Carloson Blvd
Pedestrian-safe commercial truck calming
Jade Housing Bicycle, Pedestrian and
ADA Accessibility Plan
KENNEDY HIGH
STEGE
ELEMENTARY
KING
ELEMENTARY
JFK
PARK
STATE
COURT
PARK
BOOKER T.
ANDERSON
PARK
MIRAFLORES
HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT
§¨¦580
§¨¦80
BART
EL CERRITOCYPRESS PATH
S 37TH ST
CUTTING BLVD
OND GREENWAY
KEY BLVD
FAY PL
CAROL PATH
THERESA PATH
ELLS LN
OHLONE TRL
S 49TH ST
BAYVIEW AVE
S 47TH ST
POTRERO AVE
CARLSON BLVD
MEADE ST
JULIGA WOODS ST
S 45TH ST
SEAVER AVE
WALL AVE
CENTER AVE
ELLS ST
ROBIN DR
S 41ST ST
BERK AVE
PARK
VIEW
EASTSHORE
LAUREL
PARK
PARK
PLAZA
EAST RICHMOND
CORTEZ/STEGE
& EAST
0 Miles 0.2
PANHANDLE
ANNEX
37TH
Bicycle Facility or Upgrade
John F. Kennedy High School
70 Richmond Area Community-Based Transportation Plan
Contra Costa Transportation Authority
5.4.1 High Need + High Potential Recommendations
As noted in Section 5.3, High Need + High Potential Recommendations are those projects and programs most consistent with community priorities. They have the highest potential to reduce access gaps that currently challenge community members. In addition, they are financially feasible and would face minimal implementation challenges. They received scores of 3.5 or above for both Area Need and Project Potential.
The following tables summarize recommendations across project type. Each table includes recommendations, Area Need score, Project Potential score, and estimated cost.
5.4.1.1 Active Transportation Projects and Programs
Active Transportation Projects, including bicycle and pedestrian programs and related capital improvements, comprise the majority of the High Need + High Potential Recommendations. Not only were such projects identified by the community, in current studies and during CBTP advisor coordination, but funding for active transportation and multi-modal safety remains available in the wake of COVID-19 mobility changes.
Table 5-1 High Need + High Potential Active Transportation Projects and Programs
Recommendation Area Need Score
(3.5+)
Project Potential
Score (3.5 +)
Estimated
Cost
Fill bicycle gaps surrounding Nicholl Park/DeJean Middle School by installing a Class III Bike Boulevard Route on Harry Ells Place from the Richmond Greenway to Nevin Avenue. 3.5 4.25 $105,000 Connect Booker T. Anderson Park, Stege Elementary, John F. Kennedy High School, JFK Park and King Elementary with a “Southside Parkway” Bike Boulevard that includes new and improved bike infrastructure. The route follows Ells Street from Bayview Avenue to Cypress Avenue; Cypress Avenue to South 47th Street; South 47th Street to Berk Avenue and through State Court Park to Fall Avenue; Fall Avenue to South 45th Street; South 45th Street to Overend Avenue; Overend Avenue to JFK Park, and through JFK Park to King Elementary. 4 4 $2 million
Extend the existing Nevin Avenue bike boulevard from 27th Street to Key Boulevard. 3.75 3.75 $300,000 to $400,000 Use the San Pablo Avenue Corridor Project to prioritize crosswalks, signals and lighting improvements to increase pedestrian safety along San Pablo Avenue from Cutting Boulevard to Rumrill Boulevard. Coordinate improvements with future transit services planned by WCCTAC and AC Transit. 5 3.5 $3.5 million to $5
million
Increase local pedestrian and cyclist safety and redirect semi-trucks to the nearby Richmond Parkway by installing bulbouts and other commercial truck traffic calming measures in residential areas of North Richmond. 4 3.65 Up to $2 million Close sidewalk gaps, improve existing sidewalk conditions and improve access to bus stops along the west side of San Pablo Avenue between Tara Hills Drive and Murphy Drive. 4.5 4 $750,000 to $1.25 million
Implement a “road diet” along MacDonald Avenue from Harbour Way to Richmond Parkway to accommodate Class II bike lanes andcrosswalks, signals and lighting improvements. Coordinate improvements with future transit services planned by WCCTAC and AC Transit.
4.5 3.5 $10 million
Table 5-1 High Need + High Potential Active Transportation Projects and Programs
July 8, 2022
Joe Leach, PE
Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
SUBJECT: City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant application Dear Mr. Leach,
We are writing to offer our support for the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the Bayview to BART project.
This project idea originated with a quick-build design for protected bike lanes on the Bayview Avenue overpass at I-580, funded by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The overpass already has wide shoulders which can easily be modified to include a bike lane buffer with vertical elements to protect bicyclists. The overpass provides a connection from the Equity Priority Communities in the south side of Richmond to the San Francisco Bay Trail access point at South 51st Street. To create a longer and more useful bike/ped corridor, the project includes concepts from the South Richmond Transportation Connectivity Plan, which identifies Ells Lane, Ells Path, and Cypress Path as the most direct, low-stress option for walking or cycling to San Pablo Avenue and the El Cerrito Del Norte BART station, using Potrero Avenue and Eastshore Boulevard. An already-designed striping plan for Potrero Avenue is included in the project.
The Bayview to BART project fulfills many of the goals of the grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non-vehicular travel. The project is entirely within an Equity Priority Community, is adjacent to parks and schools, and connects El Cerrito’s San Pablo Avenue Priority Development Area (PDA) to the South Richmond PDA. The project will improve and maintain local streets to meet the needs of all users while improving safety, promoting walking, biking, and other micro-mobility, and sustainable infrastructure.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact either of us at [email protected] or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Sean Dougan, Trails Program Manager Katy Hornbeck, Grants Manager East Bay Regional Park District East Bay Regional Park District
John Gioia (say “Joy-a”)
District One
Board of Supervisors
Contra
Costa
County
11780 San Pablo Avenue, Suite D
El Cerrito, CA 94530
Phone: (510) 231-8686
Fax: (510) 374-3429
Email: [email protected] ● Website: www.cocobos.org/gioia EAST RICHMOND HEIGHTS ◊ EL CERRITO ◊ EL SOBRANTE ◊ KENSINGTON ◊ MONTALVIN MANOR NORTH RICHMOND ◊ PINOLE ◊ RICHMOND ◊ ROLLINGWOOD ◊ SAN PABLO ◊ TARA HILLS July 8, 2022
Joe Leach, PE
Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Dear Mr. Leach,
I am writing in support of the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the Bayview to BART project. This project idea originated with a quick-build design for protected bike lanes on the Bayview Avenue overpass at I-580, funded by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The overpass already has wide shoulders which can easily be modified to include a bike lane buffer with vertical elements to protect bicyclists. The overpass provides a connection from the Equity Priority Communities in the south side of Richmond to the San Francisco Bay Trail access point at South 51st Street. To create a longer and safer bike/ped corridor, the project includes concepts from the South Richmond Transportation Connectivity Plan, which identifies Ells Lane, Ells Path, and Cypress Path as the most direct, low-stress option for walking or cycling to San Pablo Avenue and the El Cerrito Del Norte BART station, using Potrero Avenue and Eastshore Boulevard. An already-designed striping plan for Potrero Avenue is included in the project.
The Bayview to BART project fulfills many of the goals of the grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non-vehicular travel. The project is entirely within an Equity Priority Community, is adjacent to parks and schools, and connects El Cerrito’s San Pablo Avenue Priority Development Area (PDA) to the South Richmond PDA.
The project will improve and maintain local streets to meet the needs of all users while improving safety, promoting walking, biking, and other micro-mobility, and sustainable infrastructure. Thank you for considering this project.
Sincerely,
John Gioia
District One
Board of Supervisors
CITY HALL 10890 SAN PABLO AVENUE EL CERRITO, CA 94530 www.el-cerrito.org
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
(510) 215-4382
July 13, 2022
Joe Leach, PE, Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Dear Mr. Leach,
On behalf of the City of El Cerrito, I am writing to offer my support for the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the Bayview to BART project.
This project idea originated with a quick-build design for protected bike lanes on the Bayview Avenue overpass at I-580, funded by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The overpass already has wide shoulders which can easily be modified to include a bike lane buffer with vertical elements to protect bicyclists. The overpass provides a connection from the Equity Priority Communities in the south side of Richmond to the San Francisco Bay Trail access point at South 51st Street. To create a longer and more useful bike/ped corridor, the project includes concepts from the South Richmond Transportation Connectivity Plan, which identifies Ells Lane, Ells Path, and Cypress Path as the most direct, low-stress option for walking or cycling to San Pablo Avenue and the El Cerrito Del Norte BART station, using Potrero Avenue and Eastshore Boulevard. An already-designed striping plan for Potrero Avenue is included in the project.
The Bayview to BART project fulfills many of the goals of the grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non-vehicular travel. The project is entirely within an Equity Priority Community, is adjacent to parks and schools, and connects El Cerrito’s San Pablo Avenue Priority Development Area (PDA) to the South Richmond PDA. The project will improve and maintain local streets to meet the needs of all users while improving safety, promoting walking, biking, and other micro-mobility, and sustainable infrastructure.
We look forward to continuing to work with Richmond on projects that improve walking and biking connections between our two cities.
Sincerely,
Yvetteh Ortiz
Public Works Director/City Engineer
Joe Leach, PE
Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Dear Mr. Leach,
Rich City Rides supports the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the Bayview to BART project.
Founded in 2012, Rich City Rides was founded to create opportunities for the most vulnerable members of society to use cycling to improve health, economic stability, and individual and collective capacity while increasing the use of bikes for all community members as a sustainable social green mode of transportation. Rich City Rides aims to be the hub, nest, and incubator for community bicycling for sustainable transportation, physical and mental health, and human-to-human connections. We envision Richmond as a world-renowned bicycling community known for its bike-friendly neighborhoods and its worker-run businesses which are owned and operated by historically marginalized residents and families.
We support this project in its efforts to help bring this vision forward.
This project idea originated with a quick-build design for protected bike lanes on the Bayview Avenue overpass at I-580, funded by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The overpass already has wide shoulders which can easily be modified to include a bike lane buffer with vertical elements to protect bicyclists. The overpass provides a connection from the Equity Priority Communities in the south side of Richmond to the San Francisco Bay Trail access point at South 51 st Street. To create a longer and
more useful bike/ped corridor, the project includes concepts from the South Richmond Transportation Connectivity Plan, which identifies Ells Lane, Ells Path, and Cypress Path as the most direct, low-stress option for walking or cycling to San Pablo Avenue and the El Cerrito Del Norte BART station, using Potrero Avenue and Eastshore Boulevard. An already-designed striping plan for Potrero Avenue is included in the project.
The Bayview to BART project fulfills many of the goals of the grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non-vehicular travel. The project is entirely within an Equity Priority Community, is adjacent to parks and schools, and connects El Cerrito’s San Pablo Avenue Priority Development Area (PDA) to the South Richmond PDA. The project will improve and maintain local streets to meet the needs of all users while improving safety, promoting walking, biking, and other micro-mobility, and sustainable infrastructure.
Sincerely,
www.richcityrides.org | Rich City Rides | 1500 MacDonald Ave Unit C, Richmond, CA 94801| 510.255.0625 | [email protected]
Najari Smith
Executive Director
Rich City Rides
www.richcityrides.org | Rich City Rides | 1500 MacDonald Ave Unit C, Richmond, CA 94801| 510.255.0625 | [email protected]
July 13, 2022
Joe Leach, PE
Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
RE: OBAG3 Application for Bayview to BART Project
Dear Mr. Leach,
The Richmond Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee offers enthusiastic support for the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the Bayview to BART project. The Richmond BPAC is a resident-led advisory group that considers topics related to bicycling and walking in Richmond and makes recommendations to Richmond City staff and elected officials, among other activities to promote walking and bicycling in and around Richmond.
This project idea originated with a quick-build design for protected bike lanes on the Bayview Avenue overpass at I-580, funded by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The overpass already has wide shoulders which can easily be modified to include a bike lane buffer with vertical elements to protect bicyclists. The overpass provides a connection from the Equity Priority Communities in the southside of Richmond to the San Francisco Bay Trail access point at South 51
st Street.
In addition to the important protected lanes on the overpass, this project includes a long bike/ped corridor, providing safe connectivity to parks, schools, a library, and a transportation hub. The South Richmond Transportation Connectivity Plan identifies Ells Lane, Ells Path, and Cypress Path as the most direct, low-stress option for walking or cycling to San Pablo Avenue and the El Cerrito Del Norte BART station, using Potrero Avenue and Eastshore Boulevard. An already-designed striping plan for Potrero Avenue is included in the project.
The Bayview to BART project fulfills many of the goals of the grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non-vehicular travel.
The project is entirely within an Equity Priority Community, is adjacent to parks and schools, and connects El Cerrito’s San Pablo Avenue Priority Development Area (PDA) to the South Richmond PDA. The project will improve and maintain local streets to meet the needs of all
users while improving safety, promoting walking, biking, and other micro-mobility, and sustainable infrastructure. We, at RBPAC, fully support this proposed project.
In community,
Catalin Kaser, Chair
Richmond Bicycle / Pedestrian Advisory Committee
[email protected]
www.rbpac.org
Trails for Richmond Action Committee
TRAC
73 Belvedere Avenue
Richmond, CA 94801
Phone/Fax 510-235-2835
[email protected]
July 11, 2022
Mr. Joe Leach, Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Dear Mr. Leach,
TRAC, the Trails for Richmond Action Committee, strongly supports the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the Bayview to BART project.
Referring to the attached Bay Trail map, this project will make it much safer and more attractive for bicyclists from throughout the Bay Area to ride between the the El Cerrito del Norte BART station and San Francisco Bay Trail spur at S. 51st Street. This is important because the Bay Trail provides convenient access to the Richmond San Francisco Ferry Terminal, the Richmond San Rafael Bridge Trail and the necklace of 12 national, state, regional and City parks located along Richmond’s shoreline, including the Rosie The Riveter WWII Home Front National Historical Park. The project also will promote micro mobility for residents of Equity Priority Communities in the south side of Richmond by making it much more attractive and safer to bicycle to BART and the many destinations accessible via the Bay Trail.
The Bayview to BART project fulfills the goals of the OBAG3 grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non-vehicular travel. The project is entirely within an Equity Priority Community, is adjacent to parks and schools, and connects El Cerrito’s San Pablo Avenue Priority Development Area (PDA) to the South Richmond PDA.
Please award this project the requested OBAG3 grant.
Sincerely,
Bruce Beyaert, TRAC Chair
Attachment: Bay Trail Map for Richmond
Groundwork Richmond│ 249 Tewksbury Avenue; Suite “A” │ Richmond, CA 94801 T: (510) 847‐5031 │ Tax I.D. 45‐4966437│ www.groundworkrichmond.org July 14, 2022
Joe Leach, PE
Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Dear Mr. Leach,
We are writing to offer our support for the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the Bayview to BART project.
This project idea originated with a quick‐build design for protected bike lanes on the Bayview Avenue overpass at I‐580, funded by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The overpass already has wide shoulders which can easily be modified to include a bike lane buffer with vertical elements to protect bicyclists. The overpass provides a connection from the Equity Priority Communities in the south side of Richmond to the San Francisco Bay Trail access point at South 51 st Street. To create a longer and more useful bike/ped corridor, the project includes concepts from the South Richmond Transportation Connectivity Plan, which identifies Ells Lane, Ells Path, and Cypress Path as the most direct, low‐stress option for walking or cycling to San Pablo Avenue and the El Cerrito Del Norte BART station, using Potrero Avenue and Eastshore Boulevard. An already‐designed striping plan for Potrero Avenue is included in the project.
The Bayview to BART project fulfills many of the goals of the grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non‐vehicular travel. The project is entirely within an Equity Priority Community, is adjacent to parks and schools, and connects El Cerrito’s San Pablo Avenue Priority Development Area (PDA) to the South Richmond PDA. The project will improve and maintain local streets to meet the needs of all users while improving safety, promoting walking, biking, and other micro‐mobility, and sustainable infrastructure, and the addition of more trees along local streets assist in developing the urban canopy to combat air and noise pollution, strengthening watersheds, and providing more readily accessible green space for residents with Equity Priority Community’s.
In Community,
Megan Lamb
Co‐Executive Director
[email protected]
Groundwork Richmond
July 14, 2022
Joe Leach, PE
Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Re: City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the Bayview to BART project.
Dear Mr. Leach:
I am writing to offer my support for the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the Bayview to BART project.
This project idea originated with a quick-build design for protected bike lanes on the Bayview Avenue overpass at I-580, funded by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC). The overpass already has wide shoulders which can easily be modified to include a bike lane buffer with vertical elements to protect bicyclists. The overpass provides a connection from the Equity Priority Communities in the south side of Richmond to the San Francisco Bay Trail access point at South 51st Street. To create a longer and more useful bike/ped corridor, the project includes concepts from the South Richmond Transportation Connectivity Plan, which identifies Ells Lane, Ells Path, and Cypress Path as the most direct, low-stress option for walking or cycling to San Pablo Avenue and the El Cerrito Del Norte BART station, using Potrero Avenue and Eastshore Boulevard. An already-designed striping plan for Potrero Avenue is included in the project.
The Bayview to BART project fulfills many of the goals of the grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non-vehicular travel.
The project is entirely within an Equity Priority Community, is adjacent to parks and schools, and connects El Cerrito’s San Pablo Avenue Priority Development Area (PDA) to the South Richmond PDA. The project will improve and maintain local streets to meet the needs of all PO Box 1736, Oakland, CA 94604
510 845 RIDE (7433) • [email protected]
users while improving safety, promoting walking, biking, and other micro-mobility, and sustainable infrastructure.
Sincerely,
Dave Campbell
Advocacy Director
Bike East Bay
(510) 701-5971
[email protected]
PO Box 1736, Oakland, CA 94604
510 845 RIDE (7433) • [email protected]
MEASURE J PEER REVIEW PROCESS
Project Information Form
Project Name: McBryde Ave Safe Routes to Parks
Project Number: Enter Measure J Project No.
Proponent Name: City of Richmond
Please provide the following information:
1. Project Purpose and Need
Define the problem to be solved by the project, and how the proposed project will solve it.
McBryde Ave connects the San Pablo Ave Corridor PDA to Wildcat Regional Park but is overly wide with no bicycling infrastructure and poor pedestrian path of travel. Project will create a safe and comfortable walking and biking route from an existing bike route on 37th Street to the entrance to the park.
2. Project Description
Clearly define the proposed project, including how the needs of bicyclists, pedestrians and transit users are met, consistent with agency policies.
The west edge of the project starts at the existing bikeway on 37th Street. Here McBryde Ave is a two lane road but approaching San Pablo Avenue, eastbound traffic has two 11 ft lanes, a straight-and-left, and a straight-and-right. The straight-and-right lane will be converted to a right-only, and a 5 ft through-bike lane added in between vehicle lanes. Vehicle lanes reduced to 10 ft. Westbound 6 ft bike lane added against curb as no parking is currently allowed. From San Pablo Ave to Humboldt St, existing four-lane road (13 ft wide lanes) will be converted to two 11 ft lanes and a 11 ft center turn median with 5 ft bike lanes with 2.5 ft
Measure J Peer Review Process
Project Information Form
Project Name: McBryde Ave Safe Routes to Parks
buffers. Between Humboldt St and Amador St, on the I-80 overpass, parking restrictions make room for a 6 ft bike lane against the curb with a 6 ft buffer including vertical protective elements, flex hit posts and curb stops/armadillos. Two westbound vehicle lanes will be reduced to one, eastbound two vehicle lanes will remain, however at Amador, the straight-and-left lane will change to left-only. From Amador St to Park Ave, similarly the existing 4 lane road (12 ft lanes) will be converted to two 11 ft lanes with 11 ft center turn lane and 5 ft bike lanes with 2.5 ft buffers. Curb ramps will be built along the entire corridor.
Three intersections need redesign to provide a comfortable and safe path of travel for pedestrians. At Glenn Ave, project proposes to close off stub of Glenn Ave and build continuous sidewalk along northwest side of McBryde so that pedestrians do not have to cross over Yuba Ave and Glenn Ave. At Sonoma St, curve in McBryde creates a very wide roadway and confusing/dangerous crossings for pedestrians. Sidewalk will be built out into McBryde Ave to create a more typical intersection geometry. At Park Ave, atypical intersection will be rebuilt with a traffic circle and/or bulb-outs, sidewalk gap will be closed along north side, and curb ramps and high-visibility crosswalks will be built so that pedestrians have a clear and safe path of travel to the adjacent entrance to Alvarado Park.
Approximately 25 street trees will be planted in vacant tree wells and in unused sidewalk planter strips. Stormwater treatment is omitted due to lack of storm drains along the corridor.
3. Project Schedule
Provide Beginning and completion dates for the following activities:
Item Beginning Date Completion Date
Environmental Document 1/2023 12/2023
Final Design stages
Phase 1 (65% Design) 4/2024 9/2024
Phase 2 (90% Design) 10/2024 4/2025
Measure J Peer Review Process
Project Information Form
Project Name: McBryde Ave Safe Routes to Parks
Final Design
Right‐of‐way Engineering and Acquisition 5/2025 9/2025
Utility Relocation 10/2025 4/2026
Construction 5/2026 10/2026
4. Financial Plan
Please attach financial plan that lists proposed funding sources and amounts, including any shortfalls and potential revenue sources to address anticipated shortfalls.
5. Summary Responses
Provide responses to issues raised by Authority representatives or the CCEAC peers in previous reviews (if applicable).
Enter text here
450 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, CA 94804-1630
Telephone: (510) 307-8091 Fax: (510) 307-8116 www.ci.richmond.ca.us
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
July 15, 2022
Colin B. Clarke, AICP
Associate Transportation Planner, Planning Department
Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA)
2999 Oak Road, Suite 100, Walnut Creek, CA 94597
City of Richmond’s OBAG3 grant application for the McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Project
Dear Mr. Clarke,
Please find the attachments to our application which includes project maps, detailed budget, striping plan, letters of support, and findings from a walk audit conducted by the Richmond Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee.
The project will create a safe and comfortable walking and biking route from an existing bike route on 37th Street, through the San Pablo Ave PDA, and across I-80 to Wildcat Canyon Regional Park.
Improvements include resurfacing, a road diet from 4 to 2 vehicle lanes with a center tun lane and buffered bike lanes, curb ramps, curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks, sidewalk gap closures, traffic calming, and street trees. The project serves an Equity Priority Community and is supported by a number of organizations and agencies.
The total project cost is $1,168,845 of which we are requesting $1,027,947 in OBAG3 funds.
Sincerely,
Patrick Phelan
Infrastructure Administrator
City of Richmond Public Works
510-307-8111
[email protected]
Install Bike Lanes
Reduce 4 Lanes to 2
Add Center Turn Lane
or Medians
Install Bike Lanes
Reduce 4 Lanes to 2
Add Center Turn Lane
or Medians
Install Bike Lanes
Reduce 4 Lanes to 2
Add Center Turn Lane
or Medians
Install Protected Bike Lanes
Build Curb Extensions
to Shorten Crosswalks
at Skewed Intersections
Close Gap in Sidewalk
Install Crosswalks
And Traffic Calming
Install ADA-Compliant Curb Ramps
On Entire Corridor
EAST
RICHMOND
HEIGHTS
80 SAN PABLO AVENUE
PRIORITY DEVELOPMENT AREA
SAN PABLO
R I C H M O N D
WILDCAT CANYON
REGIONAL PARK
AMADOR ST
ANDRADE AVE
NATALIE CT
CASINO AVE
MCBRYDE AVE
SAN PABLO AVE
BERNHARD AVE
HUMBOLDT ST
GLENN AVE
MONTOYA AVE
PARK AVE
ARLINGTON BLVD
YUBA AVE
KIRK LN
VENTURA ST
RAMP
RALSTON AVE
ESMOND AVE
MARIN AVE
MCLAUGHLIN ST
SONOMA ST
LASSEN ST
SHASTA AVE
37TH ST
WILSON AVE
BROOKSIDE AVE
JOEL CT
KERN ST
YUBA
ST
GERALD AVE
RIVERSIDE
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
SAINT DAVIDS
ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL
WILDCAT CREEK
WILDCAT CREEK
RICHMOND WILDCAT
CANYON
McBryde Ave Safe-Routes-To-Parks Project Concept
1 Inch = 325 Feet
0 200 400
Feet
Proposed Curb Extension
Proposed Traffic Circle
Existing Speed Hump
ADA Compliant
Needs Detectable Warning Surface
Build Curb Ramp
Rebuild Non-Compliant Ramp
New Trees
Traffic Signal
City Boundaries
Watercourse
PDA
Parcel Owner
EBRPD
WCCUSD
Existing Bikeways
Class 2 Lane
Class 3 Sharrow
The goal of this project is to provide a safe and comfortable walking and biking route from Wildcat Canyon Regional Park to the amenities and bus service along San Pablo Ave and an existing crosstown bike route on 37th St. Project will improving pavement condition, calm traffic, add audible pedestrian signals, restripe the roadway with bike lanes, and build curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, and other pedestrian improvements. If funded, design will be finalized with community input, and additional protected bike lanes are possible.
PROJECT LOCATION
WILDCAT
CANYON
REGIONAL PARK
RICHMOND
CITY HALL
CENTER
R I C H M O N D
EL CERRITO
SAN PABLO
80 LINCOLN AVE
PINE AVE
HELLINGS AVE
ALFREDA BLVD
ANDRADE AVE
ALLEY
ESMOND AVE
ARLINGTON BLVD
EMERIC AVE
BUSH AVE
MARKET AVE
SUTTER AVE
BONITA RD
RHEEM AVE
LOWELL AVE
BARRETT AVE
SAN PABLOTOWNE CTR
GARVIN AVE
MACDONALDAVE
HAZEL AVE
COSTA AVE
GLENN AVE
38TH ST
23RD ST
MARINA WAY
MORAN AVE
PENNSYLVANIA AVE
RUMRILL BLVD
SOLANO AVE
ZARA AVE
PARK AVE
EDWARDS AVE
35TH ST
22ND ST
POST AVE
MESAWAY
BERNHARD AVE
SILVA AVE
N ARLINGTON BLVD
GRANT AVE
RALSTON AVE
HIGHLAND AVE
CARQUINEZ AVE
PLYMOUTHAVE
BEAU RIVAGE
ALPINE RD
MONTE CRES TA AVE
BURBECK AVE
KERN ST
YUBA ST
WILDCAT CANYON PKWY
ROOSEVELT AVE
VILLA DR
YALE AVE
37TH ST
DOREMUS AVE
W ILLOW RD
HAYES ST
MOUNT ST
DOWNER AVE
KIRK LN
PORTOLA AVE
AP TTERSO N CIR
33RD ST
ZINN ST
34TH ST
CERRITO AVE
24TH ST
SANFORD AVE
28TH ST
30TH ST
YUBA AVE
SIERRA AVE
DIMM
ST
13TH ST
26TH ST
CALIFORNIA AVE
20TH ST
MARIN AVE
WILSON AVE
36TH ST
19TH ST
CLINTON AVE
V ALE RD
AMADOR
ST
NEVIN AVE
CHURCH LN
HOWARD ST
SONOMA ST
MARICOPA AVE
TULARE AVE
MIRA VISTA DR
15TH ST
17TH ST
14TH ST
18TH ST
KEY
BLVD
MONTEREY
AVE
CASINO AVE
25TH ST
RF ANCI SCO WAY
VILLAGE
W YA
32ND ST
43RD ST
31ST ST
42ND ST
16TH ST
21ST ST
ROSE ARBOR AVE
27TH ST
JOEL CT
29TH ST
41ST ST
HUMPHREY AVE
DUNN AVE
COALINGA AVE
GAYNOR AVE
40TH ST
44TH ST
CALIFORN IABLVD
39TH ST
MCLAUGHLIN ST
VISALIA AVE
WILCOX AVE
CIVIC CENTER ST
TISBURY LN
WENDELL AVE
DIMM WAY
VENTURA ST
LASSEN ST
TULLER AVE
HUMBOLDT ST
VENTURA AVE
CARLSTON ST
FELIX AVE
BAYO
VSI TA
AVE
H LI LCREST RD
WILDC AT C REEK TRL
M CBRYD E AVE
SAN PABLO AVE
SAN PABLO DAM
RD
RICHMOND
WILDCAT CREEK
EAST RICHMOND
HEIGHTS
RICHMOND WILDCAT
CANYON
McBryde Ave Safe-Routes-To-Parks Project Context
1 Inch = 1,250 Feet
0 0.15 0.3
Miles
Equity Priority Community
Priority Development Area
Transit-Rich Outside HRA
Parks/Public Areas
City Boundaries
Watercourse
BART Track
AC Transit Bus Line
Proposed Bikeways
Existing Bikeways
Class 1 Path
Class 2 Lane
Class 3 Sharrow
Class 3 Boulevard Page 1477 of 2052
City of Richmond
OBAG3 Grant Application
McBryde Avenue Project Estimate
Item Unit Unit Cost Quantity Total Grant Ask Local Match Paving SF 1.90 $ 100,100 $ 190,190 $ 95,095 $ 95,095 Slurry SF 0.50 $ 76,790 $ 38,395 $ 19,198 $ 19,198 Pavement Asphalt Concrete Repair SF 12.00 $ 535 $ 6,420 $ 6,420 Crack Seal (10% of slurry area) SF 0.15 $ 7,679 $ 1,152 $ 1,152 Curb Ramp EA 7,000.00 $ 30 210,000 $ $ 210,000 Street Tree EA 200.00 $ 25 $ 5,000 $ 5,000 Curb Extension EA 25,000.00 $ 2 50,000 $ $ 50,000 Sidewalk SF 25.00 $ 350 $ 8,750 $ 8,750 Sidewalk Repair SF 30.00 $ 300 $ 9,000 $ 9,000 Traffic Circle EA 25,000.00 $ 1 25,000 $ $ 25,000 D11‐1 sign + pole EA 900.00 $ 8 7,200 $ $ 7,200 Wayfinding Sign EA 500.00 $ 8 4,000 $ $ 4,000 Traffic Study EA 30,000.00 $ 1 30,000 $ $ 30,000 RPM Detail 10 LF 2.00 $ 100 $ 200 $ 200 RPM Detail 30 LF 2.00 $ 1,174 $ 2,348 $ 2,348 RPM (Detail 33) LF 2.00 $ 3,093 $ 6,186 $ 6,186 Thermo ‐ 6" Stripe (Detail 39) LF 1.50 $ 10,689 $ 16,034 $ 16,034 Thermo ‐ 6" Stripe (Detail 39A) LF 1.50 $ 1,400 $ 2,100 $ 2,100 Thermo ‐ 8" Stripe (Detail 38) LF 2.00 $ 161 $ 322 $ 322 Thermo ‐ 8" Stripe (Detail 38A) LF 2.00 $ 327 $ 654 $ 654 Thermo ‐ 12" Stripe (W/Y) LF 3.00 $ 1,310 $ 3,930 $ 3,930 Thermo ‐ Pavement Markings SF 8.00 $ 1,560 $ 12,480 $ 12,480 D2‐1 (Direction Sign ‐ 1 Line) EA 900.00 $ 1 $ 900 $ 900 Surface Mounted Channelizer EA 300.00 $ 11 $ 3,300 $ 3,300 Rubber Lane Separator EA 200.00 $ 11 $ 2,200 $ 2,200 Traffic Control LS 75,000.00 $ 1 75,000 $ $ 75,000 Subtotal $ 710,760 $ 596,468
Construction Contingency LS 15% 1 106,614 $ $ 106,614 Construction Total $ 817,374 $ 703,082 Staff Time LS 5.0% 1 40,869 $ $ 26,000 $ 14,869 Design LS 10.0% 1 81,737 $ $ 70,000 $ 11,737 Mobilization LS 10.0% 1 81,737 $ $ 81,737 ‐$ Construction Management LS 18.0% 1 147,127 $ $ 147,127 ‐$ Grant Total $ 1,168,845 $ 1,027,947 $ 140,899 Local Share % 12.05%
P:\Dept\PS-Eng-WasteWater\Engineering - Staff\Keelan Jones\XR_STRIPING MCBRYDE ALT II CALTRANS_rev 1.dwg 14 Jul 2022 1:56:46pm bustamJ
July 8, 2022
Joe Leach, PE
Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
SUBJECT: City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant application Dear Mr. Leach,
I am writing to offer my support for the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Project.
McBryde Avenue is a proposed bike route in the city’s Bicycle Master Plan and provides direct access to Wildcat Canyon Regional Park. Currently the road has no bicycle facilities, insufficient pedestrian accommodation, and four vehicle lanes, creating an environment solely suited to car travel. This project will transform the corridor by reducing the four vehicle lanes to two while adding a center turn lane, bike lanes, and pedestrian improvements such as ADA-compliant curb ramps, curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks, and sidewalk gap closures. Bike lanes will have buffers and physical protection where possible without removing existing parking. Vehicle traffic flow will be maintained by making modifications to the three traffic signals along the route.
The McBryde Avenue project fulfills many of the goals of the grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non-vehicular travel. The project corridor is in or adjacent to Equity Priority Communities and crosses the San Pablo Avenue Corridor Priority Development Area (PDA). The project will improve and maintain local streets to meet the needs of all users while improving safety, promoting walking, biking, and other micro-mobility, and sustainable infrastructure.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact either of us at [email protected] or [email protected].
Sincerely,
Sean Dougan, Trails Program Manager Katy Hornbeck, Grants Manager East Bay Regional Park District East Bay Regional Park District
John Gioia (say “Joy-a”)
District One
Board of Supervisors
Contra
Costa
County
11780 San Pablo Avenue, Suite D
El Cerrito, CA 94530
Phone: (510) 231-8686
Fax: (510) 374-3429
Email: [email protected] ● Website: www.cocobos.org/gioia EAST RICHMOND HEIGHTS ◊ EL CERRITO ◊ EL SOBRANTE ◊ KENSINGTON ◊ MONTALVIN MANOR NORTH RICHMOND ◊ PINOLE ◊ RICHMOND ◊ ROLLINGWOOD ◊ SAN PABLO ◊ TARA HILLS July 8, 2022
Joe Leach, PE
Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Dear Mr. Leach,
I am writing in support of the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Project.
McBryde Avenue is a proposed bike route in the city’s Bicycle Master Plan and provides direct access to Wildcat Canyon Regional Park. Currently the road has no bicycle facilities, insufficient pedestrian accommodation, and four vehicle lanes, creating an environment solely suited to car travel. This project will transform the corridor by reducing the four vehicle lanes to two while adding a center turn lane, bike lanes, and pedestrian improvements such as ADA-compliant curb ramps, curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks, and sidewalk gap closures. Bike lanes will have buffers and physical protection where possible without removing existing parking. Vehicle traffic flow will be maintained by making modifications to the three traffic signals along the route.
The McBryde Avenue project fulfills many of the goals of the grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non-vehicular travel. The project corridor is in or adjacent to Equity Priority Communities and crosses the San Pablo Avenue Corridor Priority Development Area (PDA). The project will improve and maintain local streets to meet the needs of all users while improving safety, promoting walking, biking, and other micro-mobility, and sustainable infrastructure. Thank you for considering this project.
Sincerely,
John Gioia
District One
Board of Supervisors
CITY OF SAN PABLO
Public Works Department
1000 Gateway Avenue ● San Pablo, CA 94806
Main: 510-215-3060 ● Fax: 510-215-3013
www.SanPabloCA.gov
July 13, 2022
Joe Leach, PE
Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Re: Support for the City of Richmond’s McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Project Dear Mr. Leach,
I am writing to offer my support for the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant Cycle 3 application for the McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Project.
McBryde Avenue borders the City of San Pablo between Kern Street and Wildcat Canyon Regional Park. Currently the road has no bicycle facilities, insufficient pedestrian accommodation, and four vehicle lanes, creating an environment solely suited to car travel. To my understanding, this project will transform the corridor by reducing the four vehicle lanes to two while adding a center turn lane, bike lanes, and pedestrian improvements such as ADAcompliant curb ramps, curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks, and sidewalk gap closures.
Bike lanes will have buffers and physical protection where possible without removing existing parking. Vehicle traffic flow will be maintained by making modifications to the three traffic signals along the route.
This McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Project will support safe bicycle and pedestrian travel to Wildcat Canyon Regional Park for residents of both the cities of San Pablo and Richmond. Additionally, these improvements along McBryde Avenue connect with the bicycle boulevard recommended on Marin Avenue in the San Pablo Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan (2017). The City of San Pablo appreciates the efforts by the City of Richmond to collaborate and engage with San Pablo neighbors in the effort to create safer streets for all.
Best regards,
ALLAN A. PANGANIBAN, P.E.
Public Works Director / City Engineer
July 14, 2022
Joe Leach, PE
Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Re: City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Project
Dear Mr. Leach:
I am writing to offer my support for the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Project.
McBryde Avenue is a proposed bike route in the city’s Bicycle Master Plan and provides direct access to Wildcat Canyon Regional Park. Currently the road has no bicycle facilities, insufficient pedestrian accommodation, and four vehicle lanes, creating an environment solely suited to car travel. This project will transform the corridor by reducing the four vehicle lanes to two while adding a center turn lane, bike lanes, and pedestrian improvements such as ADA-compliant curb ramps, curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks, and sidewalk gap closures. Bike lanes will have buffers and physical protection where possible without removing existing parking. Vehicle traffic flow will be maintained by making modifications to the three traffic signals along the route.
The McBryde Avenue project fulfills many of the goals of the grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non-vehicular travel.
The project corridor is in or adjacent to Equity Priority Communities and crosses the San Pablo Avenue Corridor Priority Development Area (PDA). The project will improve and maintain local streets to meet the needs of all users while improving safety, promoting walking, biking, and other micro-mobility, and sustainable infrastructure.
PO Box 1736, Oakland, CA 94604
510 845 RIDE (7433) • [email protected]
Sincerely,
Dave Campbell
Advocacy Director
Bike East Bay
(510) 701-5971
[email protected]
PO Box 1736, Oakland, CA 94604
510 845 RIDE (7433) • [email protected]
July 13, 2022
Joe Leach, PE
Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
RE: OBAG3 Application for McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Project Dear Mr. Leach,
I am writing on behalf of the Richmond Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee to offer our enthusiastic support for the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Project.
McBryde Avenue is a proposed bike route in the city’s Bicycle Master Plan and provides direct access to Wildcat Canyon Regional Park, which includes Alvarado Park, with its popular playground and picnic areas. The city’s Pedestrian Plan identifies McBryde Avenue east of San Pablo Avenue as a good candidate for a road diet (p. 21), and lists it as a priority project. McBryde Avenue currently has no bicycle facilities, insufficient pedestrian accommodation, and four vehicle lanes, creating an environment solely suited to car travel.
This project will transform the corridor by reducing the four vehicle lanes to two while adding a center turn lane, bike lanes, and pedestrian improvements such as ADA-compliant curb ramps, curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks, and sidewalk gap closures. Bike lanes will have buffers and physical protection where possible without removing existing parking. Vehicle traffic flow will be maintained by making modifications to the three traffic signals along the route.
The McBryde Avenue project fulfills many of the goals of the grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non-vehicular travel. The project corridor is in or adjacent to Equity Priority Communities and crosses the San Pablo Avenue Corridor Priority Development Area (PDA). The project will improve and maintain local streets to meet the needs of all users while improving safety and will promote walking, biking, and other micro-mobility, with sustainable infrastructure.
The Richmond BPAC is a resident-led advisory group that considers topics related to bicycling and walking in Richmond and makes recommendations to Richmond City staff and elected officials, among other activities to promote walking and bicycling in and around Richmond. Our members conducted walk and bike audits for this project and are enthusiastic to help make this a reality.
In service to community,
Catalin Kaser, Chair
Richmond Bicycle / Pedestrian Advisory Committee
[email protected]
www.rbpac.org
Joe Leach, PE
Public Works Director
City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Dear Mr. Leach,
Rich City Rides supports the City of Richmond’s One Bay Area Grant (OBAG3) application for the McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Project.
Founded in 2012, Rich City Rides was founded to create opportunities for the most vulnerable members of society to use cycling to improve health, economic stability, and individual and collective capacity while increasing the use of bikes for all community members as a sustainable social green mode of transportation. Rich City Rides aims to be the hub, nest, and incubator for community bicycling for sustainable transportation, physical and mental health, and human-to-human connections. We envision Richmond as a world-renowned bicycling community known for its bike-friendly neighborhoods and its worker-run businesses which are owned and operated by historically marginalized residents and families.
We support this project in it's efforts to help bring this vision forward.
McBryde Avenue is a proposed bike route in the city’s Bicycle Master Plan and provides direct access to Wildcat Canyon Regional Park. Currently the road has no bicycle facilities, insufficient pedestrian accommodation, and four vehicle lanes, creating an environment solely suited to car travel. This project will transform the corridor by reducing the four vehicle lanes to two while adding a center turn lane, bike lanes, and pedestrian improvements such as ADA-compliant curb ramps, curb extensions, high visibility crosswalks, and sidewalk gap closures. Bike lanes will have buffers and physical protection where possible without removing existing parking. Vehicle traffic flow will be maintained by making modifications to the three traffic signals along the route.
The McBryde Avenue project fulfills many of the goals of the grant program and responds to the public’s safety concerns and requests for better infrastructure for non-vehicular travel. The project corridor is in or adjacent to Equity Priority Communities and crosses the San Pablo Avenue Corridor Priority Development Area (PDA). The project will improve and maintain local streets to meet the needs of all users while improving safety, promoting walking, biking, and other micro-mobility, and sustainable infrastructure.
In conclusion, we believe this project is very advantageous and beneficial to the city and its citizens. The McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Project is a tremendous resource for the whole community. We know that these funds will be spent effectively and judiciously. Rich City Rides will help and support this grant in any way we can.
www.richcityrides.org | Rich City Rides | 1500 MacDonald Ave Unit C, Richmond, CA 94801| 510.255.0625 | [email protected]
Sincerely,
Najari Smith
Executive Director
Rich City Rides
www.richcityrides.org | Rich City Rides | 1500 MacDonald Ave Unit C, Richmond, CA 94801| 510.255.0625 | [email protected]
EAST RICHMOND NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL
July 15, 2022
City of Richmond
Engineering & Capital Improvement Projects
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Via Email: [email protected]
Re: Support for McBryde Safe-Routes-To-Parks
Dear Mr. Phelan,
We enthusiastically support the McBryde Safe-Routes-To-Parks proposal and hope that the City’s grant application is successful.
While passing out flyers describing the project to neighbors on McBryde, a neighbor with a small child came out of the house to talk to me about the need for walking, bicycling, and traffic improvements along this wide and busy avenue. As you know, other neighbors have written in support of funding for this project.
The project’s objectives to improve the pavement condition, calm traffic, modify traffic signals, add audible pedestrian signals, restripe the roadway with bike lanes, and build curb ramps, high visibility crosswalks, and other pedestrian improvements are just what are needed to provide a safe route on McBryde Avenue to Wildcat Canyon Park. Families and people of all ages visit the park regularly. This plan will increase safety in general on McBryde Avenue and make it safer and more attractive to bike and walk to the park. If the project is successfully funded, we also appreciate that the City will provide opportunities for further community input.
Thank you for developing this project proposal and let us know if there is anything else we can do to to assist the McBryde Safe Routes project to become a reality.
Sincerely,
Jim Hanson
President, East Richmond Neighborhood Council
Walk Audit for Alvarado Park from West of San Pablo Ave Date: 6-24-22
In attendance (in case this is useful for the grant-writing):
● Art Peterson, retired, age 77, completely blind for over a decade, life-long resident of the area, member of RBPAC
● Ann Killebrew, retired, member of RBPAC
● Catalin Kaser, 54, school teacher, chair of RBPAC
Summary of route:
We walked from the SW corner of 31st Street and Esmond, across Esmond, north on the west side of 31st up to McBryde, then along the south side of McBryde.
We walked up the south (which becomes the west, as it turns) side of McBryde all the way to Park Ave to Alvarado Park. We returned on the north side of the street all the way to 31st Street.
Approximate distance: 1.1 mile each way
Rationale: The North&East neighborhood is highly residential, and the route along McBryde is the likely route for many families with children, and people of all ages and abilities, to get to the park. Additionally, families from the Belding Woods Neighborhood might also choose McBryde as their main point of crossing San Pablo to get to Alvarado Park. Finally, our blind member, Art, lives near 31st and Esmond, so we started from there.
Focus: Sidewalks and Intersections
We looked at the route with special attention to its accessibility to (a) blind or sight-impaired people, (b) people using mobility devices including wheelchairs and walkers, (c) children who would be using the sidewalk, whether in strollers pushed by parents, or small ride-on devices like bikes and trikes, or walking.
On this walk, we did not consider the needs of adult or children bicyclists who would be using the streets.
GENERAL COMMENTS
McBryde seems subjectively much wider than it needs to be for traffic volume. It would be good to get some data to confirm this. It’s important to note that many drivers take McBryde east over the freeway, then left (north) on Amador to reach San Pablo Dam Road into El Sobrante or to get on I-80 heading north. McBryde east of Amador is particularly overbuilt (wider than it needs to be for existing traffic).
Another noticeable aspect of McBryde iis that the intersections from Amador up to the Alvarado Park are all designed to keep cars flowing without stopping or particularly slowing down, which makes all the intersections particularly perilous for sidewalk users.
AREAS OF GREATEST CONCERN
1. McBryde/Park/Marin area, near the entrance to the park (See Map 2)
First: We walked on the south/southwest side of McBryde toward the park. Where the forward direction becomes Park Ave and McBryde veers off to the southwest, there is no way from the sidewalk to cross the street to get to the park. Cars continuing forward onto Park have a stop sign, but the curve of McBryde to the east is really blind curve. Traffic does not stop in either direction between the two sections of McBryde. The sidewalk here along the curve is also very narrow.
See photo and video of Art Peterson, with his cane, standing on the sidewalk. A wheel user would be as much at a loss.
Second, there is a crosswalk across Park Ave to the park entrance. Unfortunately, the park entrance, beautifully redone, with stone/slate, is not at all wheel-friendly. The curb is not ramped, and the entrance has only stairs leading down. A wheel user would need to travel out into the street, then squeeze around the gate that closes the driveway into the park that is used by park vehicles. It would be great if EBRPD could add a welcoming entrance for wheeled users.
Third, the northwest side of Park/McBryde is not pedestrian friendly. The park office and the next residence create essentially a long stretch of street with no sidewalk. When the sidewalk does start, it does not have a ramp. There are usually personal vehicles parked on the street here too, which makes it difficult to even see when the sidewalk begins. This sidewalk seemed narrow, particularly where there was a lot of tall vegetation along the fenceline.
Further, that sidewalk curves around to the Marin intersection, with no stop sign or controlled stop for cars. Because of the “cars should be flowing” type of street design, the crossing of Marin is extremely long. So, no curb ramps, no stop for cars turning right onto Marin from McBryde, and the distance to cross is long.
Heading into the park from this side of McBryde would pose problems crossing here as well.
Note: the border of San Pablo is partway down this block, so this is very definitely an inter-city cooperation zone.
2. McBryde/Glenn/Yuba/Sonoma (this is where McBryde curves significantly (See Map 3) Sonoma/McBryde (south side of McBryde):
Designed for high car volume and speed. No clear indication for blind pedestrian about where to cross. **Note from Art: These long crossings and irregular geometry make it really difficult for blind pedestrians to aim accurately to the other side. On normal rectangular-grid streets, a blind walker can be guided accurately by the sounds of parallel traffic on even a long crossing, but a lot of the street geometry near the park is, unfortunately, a little whacky. **
Glenn/Yuba/McBryde triangle:
We walked southwest along the northwest side of McBryde. There is no safe way to cross Glenn at all, though that would be the most direct way to stay on McBryde. Instead, we walked along the curved sidewalk onto Glenn until we got to the Glenn/Yuba intersection. Our aim was to get back on McBryde.
In order to do this using curb ramps, we had to cross Yuba on the north side of Glenn, then cross Glenn on the west side of Yuba, then curve around a small section of sidewalk on Yuba to reach McBryde. The curb ramp on Glenn at Yuba is behind the stop line for traffic, so essentially pedestrian are directed into unstopped traffic to access the ramp.
Note: the border of San Pablo is on Glenn before Yuba, so we technically had to enter and exit San Pablo in order to continue on our way down McBryde. A definite opportunity/need to collaborate with the City of San Pablo on improving this route.
Crossing McBryde Ave at Yuba:
Yuba continues on to the south of McBryde, and this would be a route that neighbors in that part of Richmond would want to take. There is an existing crosswalk on the west side of Yuba, just two simple white stripes across an incredibly wide street. I personally have sometimes run across that intersection (while out for a run), but I would not be comfortable walking children across it, and I didn’t suggest walking Art across it.
3. McBryde/San Pablo Ave intersection (See Map 4)
Crossing San Pablo Ave on south
On this walk, we crossed San Pablo from west to east on the south side of the intersection, from the La Loma market to the gas station. Art was used to listening for the traffic patterns, which he has to rely on because there are no audible signals. When we got across the street, we had to walk across the gas station driveway, which felt uncomfortable, like a car could whip into us from either San Pablo or McBryde.
**Note from Art: The traffic pattern here is: 2-way through traffic on SPA, 1-way east-bound McBryde, 1- way west-bound McBryde, then back to 2-way through traffic on SPA. Worthy of note is that not only are the two traffic directions of McBryde offset, but the intersection itself is physically offset! Of course, there is no way to fix the latter. **
Gas stations on corners are designed in a particular way that allows cars to enter from all directions, but this design also leaves pedestrians very vulnerable. In this case, it feels extra so.
Crossing San Pablo Ave on north
On this walk, we crossed San Pablo on the north from east to west, on our return home from the park.
There are photos of Art and me crossing this street. There is a car in the outside southbound lane that is stopped partially in the intersection as we cross with the light. That highlights the tendency of cars turning right (west) onto McBryde from San Pablo to do so without properly stopping. Again, this intersection’s safety would be improved with audible signals.
Additionally, the crosswalk buttons are set a far distance from the crosswalk curb.
Crossing McBryde on west
We did not make this crossing on this walk, but it is an unnecessarily wide crossing (as is evidenced in the aerial view) and made more dangerous by cars turning from SPA onto McBryde at a high speed.
Crossing McBryde on east
We did not make this crossing on this walk, but it is worth noting that perhaps the lovely tree-filled median in the block of McBryde immediately to the east of San Pablo could be extended to provide a refuge island for pedestrians but is not currently designed that way.
4. McBryde/Amador crossings and bridge over freeway
Sidewalks over the freeway felt narrow, and in some cases there were signage poles making them even more narrow. Offset crossings across Amador are not signed in a way that someone unfamiliar with the route would know that there were crosswalks ahead. The audible signal for crossing the freeway off ramp was not very audible over the freeway traffic.
OTHER NOTES:
From Art Peterson:
Next time you are at the intersection of San Pablo Avenue and 23rd Street in San Pablo, please note that there is a cane-detectable raised guide strip across SPA because there is NO traffic that runs parallel to the crosswalk. Near Walter Helms there is some kind of a blind facility. A small, inexpensive detail that makes a huge difference; I commend the city for thinking of this. I noticed the strip when I still had vision, and I quickly figured out why it was there. Perhaps it could have application at Alvarado Park? From Catalin:
At the entrance to Alvarado Park, we talked to a couple who were leaving. They said they were retired and that they live just a little bit too far to walk to the park, but enjoy coming to the park regularly. The feedback they had was that the park itself needs more benches to make it more accessible to elderly people. They said it applies to all the parks in Richmond, and specifically brought up the Bay Trail as not having enough benches to stop and rest at. They talked about a friend of theirs who takes “bench walks” around Lake Merritt.
December 20, 2022
Public Works
DATE: December 20, 2022
TO: Mayor Butt and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, Director of Public Works Director Patrick Phelan, Infrastructure Administrator
Subject: Resolution Amending the Construction Agreement with W.R. Forde Associates, Inc.
FINANCIAL IMPACT: No impact to the General Fund. An additional $88,738.99 is needed to complete the project with funds coming from the ATP Quick Build Grant account #15436431-400708-
23G06.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:
City Council awarded the construction contract to W.R.
Forde Associates, Inc., in an amount not to exceed
$1,783,969 at the July 6, 2021 meeting.
STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:
The Cutting Boulevard and Harbour Way South Bikeways
Project is building a protected bikeway along Cutting
Boulevard, Hoffman Boulevard, and Harbour Way South.
Due to unforeseen conditions encountered during the
progress of construction, extra work is needed to
complete the project.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution authorizing a first amendment to the construction agreement with W.R. Forde Associates, Inc. to increase the amount by $88,738.99, for a new total
contract limit not to exceed $1,872,707.99, to complete the Cutting Boulevard and Harbour Way South Bikeways
Project and additional required work – Public Works
(Daniel Chavarria/Patrick Phelan 510-307-8111).
AGENDA
REPORT
December 20, 2022
DISCUSSION:
The Cutting Boulevard and Harbour Way South Bikeways Project was awarded to W.R.
Forde Associates, Inc. at the July 6, 2021 City Council meeting. The original construction contract is in an amount not to exceed $1,783,969, including a 10 percent contingency ($162,179).
Though there have been many delays, mainly due to railroad and Caltrans permits, most of the work on Cutting Boulevard and Harbour Way South is complete except the connecting section on Hoffman Boulevard remains.
The project implements concept designs outlined in the Ferry to Bridge to Greenway Plan, most of which consists of a two-way cycle track, where both directions of bicycle traffic are on one side of the street, separated from vehicles by a striped buffer with flexible bollards and curb stops (“armadillos”). The railroad operator (BNSF) and the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) would not allow the construction of a two-way cycle track across a railroad without significant, costly modifications to the crossing infrastructure. The design was modified to create single-direction cycle tracks on Cutting Boulevard, which avoided most problems with rail crossings, but added additional striping, bollards, and curb stops.
Other changes to the project include:
pavement repair along West Cutting Boulevard, where considerable uplift of the asphalt adjacent to the concrete gutter created dangerous conditions modifications to the striping at the railroad crossing on South Garrard Boulevard modifications to the striping at the railroad crossing on Harbour Way South unit price increases due to the delay in securing approval from BNSF, the PUC, and Caltrans
Approximately, $250,000 of changes are necessary to complete the project and comply with railroad crossing regulations. The original contract of $1,783,969 includes a contingency in the amount of $162,179. Public Works staff is requesting an additional $88,738.99, for a new total contract amount not to exceed $1,872,707.99.
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
Attachment 1 – Original Contract
Attachment 2 – Amendment to the Contract
Attachment 3 – Resolution
Contract #5744
6th
July
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E Tom Butt
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
DocuSign Envelope ID: 9F77FD92-335A-4867-B96C-47C9E315138E
W.R. Forde Associates Initial Contract Amount w/Contingency: $1,783,969.00 Contract #5744 1st Amendment: $88,738.99
Vendor #13547 Total Contract: $1,872,707.99
1 FIRST AMENDMENT TO
CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RICHMOND AND WR FORDE ASSOCIATES, INC._
This First Amendment to the Construction Agreement (the “First Amendment”) is entered into as of December 20, 2022, by and between the City of Richmond, a municipal corporation and charter city (“City”) and WR Forde Associates, Inc., a Corporation (“Contractor”), with reference to the following facts.
RECITALS
A. City and Contractor entered into that certain Construction Agreement dated July 6, 2021 (the “Agreement”) to furnish construction of Cutting & Harbour Way South Bikeway (the “Project”).
B. The Parties now desire to enter into this First Amendment in order to increase the expenditures under the Construction Agreement by an additional not-to-exceed sum of $88,738.99 (the “Additional Expenditures”), for a total amended not-to exceed amount of $1,872,707.99 as set forth on Attachment 1 attached and incorporated hereto (the “First Amended Amount”).
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals hereof, and other mutual covenants and promises contained herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:
Section 1 Amendment to Payments.
The Construction Agreement is hereby amended by this First Amendment in order to increase the Original Amount by the Additional Expenditures to reflect a new total of authorized expenditures under the Construction Agreement, equal to the First Amended Amount.
Section 2. Amendment to Scope of Work.
The Construction Agreement is hereby amended by this First Amendment in order to add extra work due to unforeseen circumstances as outlined in change orders 1 and 2 to the Project as set forth in Attachment 1.
Section 3. Miscellaneous.
(a) Except as amended by this First Amendment, the Construction Agreement has not been modified and is in full force and effect.
W.R. Forde Associates Initial Contract Amount w/Contingency: $1,783,969.00 Contract #5744 1st Amendment: $88,738.99
Vendor #13547 Total Contract: $1,872,707.99
2 (b) Each of the individuals executing this First Amendment on behalf of the Contractor and City individually represents and warrants that he or she has been authorized to do so and has the power to bind the party for whom they are signing. (c) This First Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as it the signatures to each counterpart were upon a single instrument, and is intended to be binding when all parties have delivered their signatures to the other parties.
Signatures may be delivered by facsimile or electronic transmission. All counterparts shall be deemed an original of this First Amendment.
(d) WHEREFORE, the Parties have executed this First Amendment on or as of the date first above written.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Contractor have executed this First Amendment duly authorized representatives, all on the date first written above.
Reviewed By:
_______________________
City Attorney
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk
CITY:
CITY OF RICHMOND, a municipal corporation and
charter city
By: _________________________________
Name: Shasa Curl
Its: City Manager
CONTRACTOR:
WR Forde Associates, Inc., a Corporation
By: _________________________________
Name:
Its:
1322 Canal Boulevard Richmond, CA 94801
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 1
Project: Cutting Boulevard and Harbour Way South Bikeways Location: Cutting, Hoffman, and Harbour Way South Date: November 2022 Vendor Number: Purchase Order: N/A
Contractor: WR Forde Sheet: 1 of 1
The following changes are hereby made to the Contract Documents:
The Engineer hereby directs the Contractor to complete Extra Work based on unforeseen conditions encountered during the progress of construction. The Contractor shall complete the following:
1. Unit Price Increase. Based upon the delay of securing approval from BNSF, Caltrans, and the California Public Utilities Commission, the project was delayed, and unit prices increased with inflation. These include the following:
a. Bid Schedule B items 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, and 18 to 23 increase ranging from less than 1% to almost 25%. The California Construction Cost Index from 2021 to 2022 increased by 25%. This shall be a lump sum value of $40,935.46.
b. Bid Schedule C items 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 12 to 17, 20, and 22 to 24 increase ranging from less than 1% to almost 25%. The California Construction Cost Index from 2021 to 2022 increased by 25%. This shall be a lump sum value of $88,412.21.
2. Quantity Balance. Due to the modifications of a two-way to one-way cycletrack required by the BNSF and the California Public Utilities Commission, the contractor completed additional striping work. This increased or decreased certain bid items as follows:
a. Bid Schedule B:
i. Item 14B increased by 1,232 SF for a value of $14,784. ii. Item 17B increased by 242 SF for a value of $968.
iii. The total value associated with this item is $15,752 and shall be paid as a lump sum balancing item.
b. Bid Schedule C:
i. Item 7C increased by 250 LF for a value of $120,000
ii. Item 9C increased by 1383 SF for a value of $5,532
iii. Item 13C increased by 13174 LF for a value of $19,761 iv. Item 17C increased by 668 LF for a value of $1,002
v. Item 21C increased by 73 EA for a value of $21,900
vi. Item 22C increased by 181 EA for a value of $36,200 vii. Item 11C decreased by 10 LF for a value of (-)$60
viii. Item 14C decreased by 267 LF for a value of (-)$534 ix. Item 15C decreased by 1953 LF for a value of (-)$1,953
x. Item 16C decreased by 3910 LF for a value of (-)$3,910 xi. Item 18C decreased by 2 EA for a value of (-)$1,002 xii. Item 19C decreased by 16 EA for a value of (-)$50
xiii. Item 29C decreased by 1 EA for a value of (-)$120,000 xiv. The total value associated with this item is $13,298 and shall be paid as a lump sum balancing item.
This is within the $1,783,969.00 approval from City Council Change to Contract Price:
Original Contract Price: $ 1,621,790
Current Contract Price, as adjusted by previous Change Orders: $ 1,621,790 The Contract Price due to this Change Order will be increased by: $ 158,397.67 The new Contract Price due to this Change Order will be: $ 1,780.187.67 Change to Contract Time:
The Contract time will be increased by sixty (60) working days.
Approvals:
To be effective, this order must be approved by the Owner if it changes the scope or objective of the project, or as may otherwise be required under the terms of the Contract.
Approved By 11/1/2022
Resident Engineer Date
Accepted By
Contractor Date
Authorized By 12/1/2022
Project Manager Date
1322 Canal Boulevard Richmond, CA 94801
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 2
Project: Cutting Boulevard and Harbour Way South Bikeways Location: Cutting, Hoffman, and Harbour Way South Date: December 2022 Vendor Number: Purchase Order: N/A
Contractor: WR Forde Sheet: 1 of 1
The following changes are hereby made to the Contract Documents:
The Engineer hereby directs the Contractor to complete Extra Work based on unforeseen conditions encountered during the progress of construction. The Contractor shall complete the following:
1. West Cutting Pavement Repair. As directed in the field, the contractor shall complete pavement repair within the future Class IV cycletrack. These repairs shall include milling and paving of up to 2 inches with asphalt. The work shall be completed on a Saturday to minimize disturbance to commercial properties. This shall be a lump sum value of $9,148.73.
2. Garrard Boulevard Modifications. The contractor shall complete striping modifications as shown in the exhibit to modify the two-way cycletrack crossing the BNSF tracks. This work shall include striping removal and replacement consistent with the contract special provisions. This shall be a lump sum value of $40,400.99.
3. Harbour Way South Modifications. The contractor shall complete striping modifications as shown in the exhibit to modify the two-way cycletrack crossing the BNSF tracks. This work shall include striping removal and replacement consistent with the contract special provisions. This shall be a lump sum value of $32,970.60.
4. Allowance. Allow an additional $10,000 to account for final close-out of the contract. This will be paid under the force account provisions of the special provisions.
This requires $88,738.99 approval from City Council
Change to Contract Price:
Original Contract Price: $ 1,621,790
Current Contract Price, as adjusted by previous Change Orders: $ 1,780.187.67 The Contract Price due to this Change Order will be increased by: $ 92,520.32 The new Contract Price due to this Change Order will be: $ 1,872,707.99
Change to Contract Time:
The Contract time will be increased by fifteen (15) working days.
Approvals:
To be effective, this order must be approved by the Owner if it changes the scope or objective of the project, or as may otherwise be required under the terms of the Contract.
Approved By 11/30/2022
Resident Engineer Date
Accepted By
Contractor Date
Authorized By 12/1/2022
Project Manager Date
Reso. No. xx-21
RESOLUTION NO. xx-22
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH W. R. FORDE ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE CUTTING
BOULEVARD AND HARBOUR WAY SOUTH BIKEWAYS PROJECT IN AN
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $1,872,707.99
WHEREAS, the City of Richmond is implementing bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements outlined in the Ferry to Bridge to Greenway Plan; and WHEREAS, the Cutting Boulevard and Harbour Way South Bikeways project was designed to close a large gap in bicycle facilities between the Richmond Ferry Terminal and the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge; and
WHEREAS, the City advertised the Cutting Boulevard and Harbour Way South Bikeways construction contract in conformance to applicable California Public Contracting Code, and on June 17, 2021, following the public bid process for construction, W. R. Forde Associates, Inc., was the lowest responsive, responsible bidder for the Project; and WHEREAS, on July 6, 2021, City Council awarded a construction contract to W. R.
Forde Associates, Inc., for the Project in an amount not-to-exceed $1,783,969.00, including construction contingencies; and
WHEREAS, delays have created price increases and unforeseen circumstances have required additional work outside of the original contract scope; and WHEREAS, the estimated cost for work in addition to the contingency is $88,738.99; and
WHEREAS, the total cost for the Cutting Blvd & Harbour Way South Bikeways project and additional change orders shall not exceed $1,872,707.99 ($1,783,969 original contract amount including $162,179 contingency plus $88,738.99); and WHEREAS, by the agenda report (“Agenda Report”) accompanying this resolution, the City Council has been provided with additional information upon which the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution are based.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council finds the above recitals are true and correct and have served, together with the Agenda Report, as the basis for the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes an amendment to the construction contract with W. R. Forde Associates, Inc., for the construction of the Cutting Boulevard and Harbour Way South Bikeways Project in an amount not-to-exceed $1,872,707.99.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to execute and make amendments to the construction contract as needed to facilitate the completion of the Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council designates the City Clerk as the custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision herein is based. These documents may be found at the office of the City Clerk at the Richmond City Hall, 450 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, California 94804. *************************
Reso. No. xx-21
I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held December 20, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:
Mayor
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
December 20, 2022
Public Works
DATE: December 20, 2022
TO: Mayor Butt and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, Director of Public Works
Dee Karnes, Equipment Services Superintendent
Subject: Approve the Purchase of a Replacement Altec Bucket Truck
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The funds for this expenditure are available in the Public Works Fleet Maintenance Capital Improvement Fiscal
Year 2022-2023 budget – 50336031-400705-03C04
PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:
Click or tap here to enter text.
STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:
The Department of Public Works is requesting City
Council approval for the purchase of a replacement Altec aerial boom truck.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: APPROVE the purchase of an Altec AT41M aerial boom truck from Altec Industries, in an amount not to exceed $279,400, based on Sourcewell Contract 110421-ALT –
Public Works (Daniel Chavarria 620-5478/Dee Karnes
510-231-3044).
AGENDA
REPORT
December 20, 2022
DISCUSSION:
The Fleet Maintenance division must replace a 2009 model year aerial boom truck that has met and exceeded its useful lifecycle of ten years. The new truck will meet updated air emission standards and will be used by the Electrical division of the Public Works department.
Public Works staff is requesting to purchase the boom truck by utilizing the piggyback procurement process, which is outlined in Richmond Municipal Code section 2.52.330.
Under this process, the Finance Director may arrange for the City to enter into a purchase contract for the purchase of a vehicle if specific requirements under section
2.52.330(a)(1-9) are met, including that the piggyback purchase using another agency’s purchase contract is in the best interests of the City of Richmond.
Based on the Sourcewell Contract 110421-ALT pricing, Public Works staff is recommending the purchase of the truck from Altec Industries, Inc. Pricing for Contract 110421-ALT offers Sourcewell participating agencies up to a 5% discount off the purchase list price. The price quoted for this truck is $253,958. A 10% contingency ($25,395) has been added to the quoted price for this vehicle in case of any needed change orders. After a thorough review, the Finance Director approved the utilization of the piggyback procurement (Attachment 3).
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
Attachment 1 – Quote 1298585
Attachment 2 – Sourcewell Contract 110421-ALT
Attachment 3 – Finance approval for Piggyback procurement
ATTACHMENT 1
110421-ALT
Rev. 3/2021 1
Solicitation Number: RFP #110421
CONTRACT
This Contract is between Sourcewell, 202 12th Street Northeast, P.O. Box 219, Staples, MN 56479 (Sourcewell) and Altec Industries, Inc., 210 Inverness Center Drive, Birmingham, AL 35242 (Supplier).
Sourcewell is a State of Minnesota local government unit and service cooperative created under the laws of the State of Minnesota (Minnesota Statutes Section 123A.21) that offers cooperative procurement solutions to government entities. Participation is open to eligible federal, state/province, and municipal governmental entities, higher education, K-12 education, nonprofit, tribal government, and other public entities located in the United States and Canada.
Sourcewell issued a public solicitation for Public Utility Equipment with Related Accessories and Supplies from which Supplier was awarded a contract.
Supplier desires to contract with Sourcewell to provide equipment, products, or services to Sourcewell and the entities that access Sourcewell’s cooperative purchasing contracts (Participating Entities).
1. TERM OF CONTRACT
A. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Contract is effective upon the date of the final signature below.
B. EXPIRATION DATE AND EXTENSION. This Contract expires December 27, 2025, unless it is cancelled sooner pursuant to Article 22. This Contract may be extended one additional year upon the request of Sourcewell and written agreement by Supplier.
C. SURVIVAL OF TERMS. Notwithstanding any expiration or termination of this Contract, all payment obligations incurred prior to expiration or termination will survive, as will the following: Articles 11 through 14 survive the expiration or cancellation of this Contract. All other rights will cease upon expiration or termination of this Contract.
2. EQUIPMENT, PRODUCTS, OR SERVICES
A. EQUIPMENT, PRODUCTS, OR SERVICES. Supplier will provide the Equipment, Products, or Services as stated in its Proposal submitted under the Solicitation Number listed above.
ATTACHMENT 2
110421-ALT
Rev. 3/2021 2
Supplier’s Equipment, Products, or Services Proposal (Proposal) is attached and incorporated into this Contract.
Except as expressly agreed in the participating addendum or transaction document with the participating entity, all Equipment and Products provided under this Contract must be new and the current model. Supplier may offer close-out or refurbished Equipment or Products if they are clearly indicated in Supplier’s product and pricing list. Unless agreed to by the Participating Entities in advance, Equipment or Products must be delivered as operational to the Participating Entity’s site.
This Contract offers an indefinite quantity of sales, and while substantial volume is anticipated, sales and sales volume are not guaranteed.
B. WARRANTY. Supplier warrants that all new Equipment, Products, and Services furnished (which does not include equipment or products that are solely financed) are free from liens and encumbrances, and are free from defects in design, materials, and workmanship. In addition, Supplier warrants the Equipment, Products, and Services are suitable for and will perform in accordance with the ordinary use for which they are intended. Supplier’s dealers and distributors must agree to assist the Participating Entity in reaching a resolution in any dispute over warranty terms with the manufacturer. Any manufacturer’s warranty that extends beyond the expiration of the Supplier’s warranty will be passed on to the Participating Entity.
C. DEALERS, DISTRIBUTORS, AND/OR RESELLERS. Upon Contract execution and throughout the Contract term, Supplier must provide to Sourcewell a current means to validate or authenticate Supplier’s authorized dealers, distributors, or resellers relative to the Equipment, Products, and Services offered under this Contract, which will be incorporated into this Contract by reference. It is the Supplier’s responsibility to ensure Sourcewell receives the most current information.
3. PRICING
All Equipment, Products, or Services under this Contract will be priced at or below the price stated in Supplier’s Proposal.
When providing pricing quotes to Participating Entities, all pricing quoted must reflect a Participating Entity’s total cost of acquisition. This means that the quoted cost is for delivered Equipment, Products, and Services that are operational for their intended purpose, and includes all costs to the Participating Entity’s requested delivery location.
Regardless of the payment method chosen by the Participating Entity, the total cost associated with any purchase option of the Equipment, Products, or Services must always be disclosed in the pricing quote to the applicable Participating Entity at the time of purchase.
110421-ALT
Rev. 3/2021 3
A. SHIPPING AND SHIPPING COSTS. All delivered Equipment and Products must be properly packaged. Damaged Equipment and Products may be rejected. If the damage is not readily apparent at the time of delivery, Supplier must permit the Equipment and Products to be returned within a reasonable time at no cost to Sourcewell or its Participating Entities.
Participating Entities reserve the right to inspect the Equipment and Products at a reasonable time after delivery where circumstances or conditions prevent effective inspection of the Equipment and Products at the time of delivery. In the event of the delivery of nonconforming Equipment and Products, the Participating Entity will notify the Supplier as soon as possible and the Supplier will replace nonconforming Equipment and Products with conforming Equipment and Products that are acceptable to the Participating Entity.
Supplier must arrange for and pay for the return shipment on Equipment and Products that arrive in a defective or inoperable condition.
Sourcewell may declare the Supplier in breach of this Contract if the Supplier intentionally delivers substandard or inferior Equipment or Products.
B. SALES TAX. Each Participating Entity is responsible for supplying the Supplier with valid taxexemption certification(s). When ordering, a Participating Entity must indicate if it is a taxexempt entity.
C. HOT LIST PRICING. At any time during this Contract, Supplier may offer a specific selection of Equipment, Products, or Services at discounts greater than those listed in the Contract.
When Supplier determines it will offer Hot List Pricing, it must be submitted electronically to Sourcewell in a line-item format. Equipment, Products, or Services may be added or removed from the Hot List at any time through a Sourcewell Price and Product Change Form as defined in Article 4 below.
Hot List program and pricing may also be used to discount and liquidate close-out and discontinued Equipment and Products as long as those close-out and discontinued items are clearly identified as such. Current ordering process and administrative fees apply. Hot List Pricing must be published and made available to all Participating Entities.
4. PRODUCT AND PRICING CHANGE REQUESTS
Supplier may request Equipment, Product, or Service changes, additions, or deletions at any time. All requests must be made in writing by submitting a signed Sourcewell Price and Product Change Request Form to the assigned Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator. This approved form is available from the assigned Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator.
At a minimum, the request must:
x Identify the applicable Sourcewell contract number;
110421-ALT
Rev. 3/2021 4
x Clearly specify the requested change;
x Provide sufficient detail to justify the requested change; x Individually list all Equipment, Products, or Services affected by the requested change, along with the requested change (e.g., addition, deletion, price change); and x Include a complete restatement of pricing documentation in Microsoft Excel with the effective date of the modified pricing, or product addition or deletion. The new pricing restatement must include all Equipment, Products, and Services offered, even for those items where pricing remains unchanged.
A fully executed Sourcewell Price and Product Change Request Form will become an amendment to this Contract and will be incorporated by reference.
5. PARTICIPATION, CONTRACT ACCESS, AND PARTICIPATING ENTITY REQUIREMENTS
A. PARTICIPATION. Sourcewell’s cooperative contracts are available and open to public and nonprofit entities across the United States and Canada; such as federal, state/province, municipal, K-12 and higher education, tribal government, and other public entities.
The benefits of this Contract should be available to all Participating Entities that can legally access the Equipment, Products, or Services under this Contract. A Participating Entity’s authority to access this Contract is determined through its cooperative purchasing, interlocal, or joint powers laws. Any entity accessing benefits of this Contract will be considered a Service Member of Sourcewell during such time of access. Supplier understands that a Participating Entity’s use of this Contract is at the Participating Entity’s sole convenience and Participating Entities reserve the right to obtain like Equipment, Products, or Services from any other source.
Supplier is responsible for familiarizing its sales and service forces with Sourcewell contract use eligibility requirements and documentation and will encourage potential participating entities to join Sourcewell. Sourcewell reserves the right to add and remove Participating Entities to its roster during the term of this Contract.
B. PUBLIC FACILITIES. Supplier’s employees may be required to perform work at governmentowned facilities, including schools. Supplier’s employees and agents must conduct themselves in a professional manner while on the premises, and in accordance with Participating Entity policies and procedures, and all applicable laws.
6. PARTICIPATING ENTITY USE AND PURCHASING
A. ORDERS AND PAYMENT. To access the contracted Equipment, Products, or Services under this Contract, a Participating Entity must clearly indicate to Supplier that it intends to access this Contract; however, order flow and procedure will be developed jointly between Sourcewell and Supplier. Typically, a Participating Entity will issue an order directly to Supplier or its authorized
110421-ALT
Rev. 3/2021 5
subsidiary, distributor, dealer, or reseller. If a Participating Entity issues a purchase order, it may use its own forms, but the purchase order should clearly note the applicable Sourcewell contract number. All Participating Entity orders under this Contract must be issued prior to expiration or cancellation of this Contract; however, Supplier performance, Participating Entity payment obligations, and any applicable warranty periods or other Supplier or Participating Entity obligations may extend beyond the term of this Contract.
Supplier’s acceptable forms of payment are included in its attached Proposal. Participating Entities will be solely responsible for payment and Sourcewell will have no liability for any unpaid invoice of any Participating Entity.
B. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS/PARTICIPATING ADDENDUM. Additional terms and conditions to a purchase order, or other required transaction documentation, may be negotiated between a Participating Entity and Supplier, such as job or industry-specific requirements, legal requirements (e.g., affirmative action or immigration status requirements), or specific local policy requirements. Some Participating Entities may require the use of a Participating Addendum; the terms of which will be negotiated directly between the Participating Entity and the Supplier. Any negotiated additional terms and conditions for the direct purchase of new equipment or products must never be less favorable to the Participating Entity than what is contained in this Contract.
C. SPECIALIZED SERVICE REQUIREMENTS. In the event that the Participating Entity requires service or specialized performance requirements not addressed in this Contract (such as ecommerce specifications, specialized delivery requirements, or other specifications and requirements), the Participating Entity and the Supplier may enter into a separate, standalone agreement, apart from this Contract. Sourcewell, including its agents and employees, will not be made a party to a claim for breach of such agreement.
D. TERMINATION OF ORDERS. Participating Entities may terminate an order, in whole or in part, immediately upon notice to Supplier in the event of any of the following events:
1. The Participating Entity fails to receive funding or appropriation from its governing body at levels sufficient to pay for the equipment, products, or services to be purchased; or
2. Federal, state, or provincial laws or regulations prohibit the purchase or change the Participating Entity’s requirements.
E. GOVERNING LAW AND VENUE. The governing law and venue for any action related to a Participating Entity’s order will be determined by the Participating Entity making the purchase.
110421-ALT
Rev. 3/2021 6
7. CUSTOMER SERVICE
A. PRIMARY ACCOUNT REPRESENTATIVE. Supplier will assign an Account Representative to Sourcewell for this Contract and must provide prompt notice to Sourcewell if that person is changed. The Account Representative will be responsible for:
x Maintenance and management of this Contract;
x Timely response to all Sourcewell and Participating Entity inquiries; and x Business reviews to Sourcewell and Participating Entities, if applicable.
B. BUSINESS REVIEWS. Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.
8. REPORT ON CONTRACT SALES ACTIVITY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FEE PAYMENT A. CONTRACT SALES ACTIVITY REPORT. Each calendar quarter, Supplier must provide a contract sales activity report (Report) to the Sourcewell Supplier Development Administrator assigned to this Contract. Reports are due no later than 45 days after the end of each calendar quarter. A Report must be provided regardless of the number or amount of sales during that quarter (i.e., if there are no sales, Supplier must submit a report indicating no sales were made).
The Report must contain the following fields:
x Participating Entity Name (e.g., City of Staples Highway Department); x Participating Entity Physical Street Address;
x Participating Entity City;
x Participating Entity State/Province;
x Participating Entity Zip/Postal Code;
x Participating Entity Contact Name;
x Participating Entity Contact Email Address;
x Participating Entity Contact Telephone Number;
x Sourcewell Assigned Entity/Participating Entity Number; x Item Purchased Description;
x Item Purchased Price;
x Sourcewell Administrative Fee Applied; and
x Date Purchase was invoiced/sale was recognized as revenue by Supplier.
B. ADMINISTRATIVE FEE. In consideration for the support and services provided by Sourcewell, the Supplier will pay an administrative fee to Sourcewell on all Equipment, Products, and
110421-ALT
Rev. 3/2021 7
Services provided to Participating Entities. The Administrative Fee must be included in, and not added to, the pricing. Supplier may not charge Participating Entities more than the contracted price to offset the Administrative Fee.
The Supplier will submit payment to Sourcewell for the percentage of administrative fee stated in the Proposal multiplied by the total sales of all Equipment, Products, and Services purchased by Participating Entities under this Contract during each calendar quarter. Payments should note the Supplier’s name and Sourcewell-assigned contract number in the memo; and must be mailed to the address above “Attn: Accounts Receivable” or remitted electronically to Sourcewell’s banking institution per Sourcewell’s Finance department instructions. Payments must be received no later than 45 calendar days after the end of each calendar quarter.
Supplier agrees to cooperate with Sourcewell in auditing transactions under this Contract to ensure that the administrative fee is paid on all items purchased under this Contract.
In the event the Supplier is delinquent in any undisputed administrative fees, Sourcewell reserves the right to cancel this Contract and reject any proposal submitted by the Supplier in any subsequent solicitation. In the event this Contract is cancelled by either party prior to the Contract’s expiration date, the administrative fee payment will be due no more than 30 days from the cancellation date.
9. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Sourcewell's Authorized Representative is its Chief Procurement Officer.
Supplier’s Authorized Representative is the person named in the Supplier’s Proposal. If Supplier’s Authorized Representative changes at any time during this Contract, Supplier must promptly notify Sourcewell in writing.
10. AUDIT, ASSIGNMENT, AMENDMENTS, WAIVER, AND CONTRACT COMPLETE A. AUDIT. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 16C.05, subdivision 5, the books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by Sourcewell or the Minnesota State Auditor for a minimum of six years from the end of this Contract. This clause extends to Participating Entities as it relates to business conducted by that Participating Entity under this Contract.
B. ASSIGNMENT. Neither party may assign or otherwise transfer its rights or obligations under this Contract without the prior written consent of the other party and a fully executed assignment agreement. Such consent will not be unreasonably withheld. Any prohibited assignment will be invalid.