Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE 1011 OUTSIDE FUNDED SVCS ‐ DONATION
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (23) (135) (181) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (23) (135) (181) ‐ ‐ ‐ 1012 HILLTOP LANDSCAPE MAINT DIST
PROPERTY TAXES (1,060,018) (1,091,844) (618,523) (1,124,594) (1,158,332) 3% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (1,304) (9,244) (4,822) ‐ ‐ ‐ OPER XFERS IN (215,963) (229,115) (176,990) (235,988) (243,068) 3% REVENUE (1,277,285) (1,330,203) (800,335) (1,360,582) (1,401,400) 3% SALARIES AND WAGES 433,683 500,418 443,866 587,668 599,218 2% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 376,876 457,929 331,677 466,983 400,281 ‐ 14% PROF & ADMIN 9,536 9,856 10,083 40,000 40,000 0% OTHER OPERATING 29,336 84,189 35,890 77,900 77,900 0% UTILITIES 80,105 73,617 72,374 88,000 101,000 15% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 46,720 53,843 21,620 65,000 75,000 15% COST POOL 145,433 230,455 347,401 463,200 116,115 ‐ 75% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY ‐ 216,855 23,000 23,000 ‐ ‐ 100% EXPENDITURE 1,121,689 1,627,163 1,285,910 1,811,751 1,409,514 ‐ 22% 1013 HAZMAT FUND
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (145) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ OPER XFERS IN ‐ (6,209) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (145) (6,209) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ OTHER OPERATING 3,966 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 3,966 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1015 MARINA BAY LNDSCP & LIGHT DIST
PROPERTY TAXES (671,141) (693,358) (393,065) (709,524) (730,810) 3% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (3,097) (14,573) (15,819) ‐ ‐ ‐ OPER XFERS IN (448,967) (473,966) (357,233) (476,309) (490,599) 3% REVENUE (1,123,205) (1,181,896) (766,117) (1,185,833) (1,221,409) 3%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE SALARIES AND WAGES 450,061 512,443 332,775 399,727 455,467 14% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 328,397 403,075 206,461 241,437 240,037 ‐ 1% PROF & ADMIN 34,007 38,179 21,950 53,503 63,503 19% OTHER OPERATING 60,510 56,044 38,391 80,000 80,000 0% UTILITIES 148,724 128,378 136,722 134,395 255,000 90% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 20,414 25,541 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ COST POOL 116,448 194,271 115,011 153,348 90,661 ‐ 41% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY ‐ ‐ ‐ 41,000 ‐ ‐ 100% EXPENDITURE 1,158,560 1,357,930 851,310 1,103,410 1,184,668 7% 1017 CHEVRON MODERNIZATN PROJ & CIA
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (54,117) (326,886) (455,814) ‐ ‐ ‐ OTHER REVENUE (417) (49,824) 42,075 ‐ ‐ ‐ INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (7,000,000) (6,000,000) (16,500) (4,000,000) ‐ ‐ 100% REVENUE (7,054,534) (6,376,710) (430,239) (4,000,000) ‐ ‐ 100% PROF & ADMIN 4,062,376 3,913,908 1,498,545 8,095,093 5,584,033 ‐ 31% OTHER OPERATING 48,818 ‐ 557 20,541 335,048 1531% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 532,101 337,534 303,629 1,501,829 1,118,000 ‐ 26% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,921,149 181,042 67,640 207,252 111,000 ‐ 46% GRANT EXPENDITURES 39,390 ‐ ‐ 50,000 50,000 0% EXPENDITURE 6,603,834 4,432,484 1,870,371 9,874,715 7,198,081 ‐ 27% 1018 RENT CONTROL
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (2,332,429) (2,553,651) (2,618,535) (3,004,698) (3,400,000) 13% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (6,803) (39,267) (52,599) (20,000) (20,000) 0% OTHER REVENUE (14,641) (40,078) (26,235) (50,000) (50,000) 0% INTERGOV OTHER GRANT ‐ (10,000) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ OPER XFERS IN ‐ ‐ (112,500) (150,000) (150,000) 0% REVENUE (2,353,873) (2,642,997) (2,809,869) (3,224,698) (3,620,000) 12% SALARIES AND WAGES 1,061,458 1,318,414 1,172,900 1,670,462 1,894,023 13% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 690,793 899,264 682,845 981,380 989,862 1% PROF & ADMIN 226,744 218,413 154,226 427,358 391,550 ‐ 8%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE OTHER OPERATING 36,214 22,949 17,989 51,780 49,000 ‐ 5% UTILITIES 481 ‐ ‐ 500 500 0% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 188 112 56 ‐ ‐ ‐ PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 8,991 9,163 9,195 9,300 9,500 2% COST POOL 182,704 184,632 247,856 330,473 208,776 ‐ 37% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 307 ‐ ‐ 5,000 ‐ ‐ 100% EXPENDITURE 2,207,880 2,652,947 2,285,067 3,476,253 3,543,212 2% 1019 ROAD MAINT & REHAB ACCT (RMRA)
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (10,625) (45,766) (69,565) ‐ ‐ ‐ INTERGOV STATE TAXES (2,229,436) (2,559,099) (1,914,761) (2,864,927) (2,966,001) 4% REVENUE (2,240,062) (2,604,866) (1,984,326) (2,864,927) (2,966,001) 4% PROF & ADMIN 160,112 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 21,778 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,501,079 3,621,946 34,685 3,577,828 5,871,845 64% EXPENDITURE 1,682,969 3,621,946 34,685 3,577,828 5,871,845 64% 1050 CR ‐PLANNING & BUILDING
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (7,984,105) (9,354,891) (6,151,482) (7,012,038) (7,227,283) 3% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (19,825) (230,778) (392,898) (32,307) (82,307) 155% CHARGES FOR SERVICES (600,726) (530,334) (203,606) (4,314,000) (2,754,000) ‐ 36% OTHER REVENUE (6,438) (20) ‐ (50) (50) 0% INTERGOV FED GRANT ‐ (25,000) ‐ (750,000) (750,000) 0% INTERGOV STATE GRANT (122,929) (2,797,300) (2,635,882) (3,861,030) (183,099) ‐ 95% INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (262,951) (52,093) ‐ (15,000) ‐ ‐ 100% OPER XFERS IN (660,693) (782,154) (511,357) (1,800,000) (1,800,000) 0% REVENUE (9,657,667) (13,772,569) (9,895,225) (17,784,426) (12,796,739) ‐ 28% SALARIES AND WAGES 2,125,137 2,217,535 2,009,378 3,083,766 3,599,561 17% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 1,395,375 1,497,382 1,168,555 1,803,443 1,843,691 2% PROF & ADMIN 3,208,376 5,644,600 4,522,149 12,794,348 6,916,755 ‐ 46% OTHER OPERATING 57,199 188,325 138,624 147,954 88,401 ‐ 40% UTILITIES 12,410 24,600 8,077 40,200 9,000 ‐ 78%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 11,472 13,949 1,198 76,876 11,409 ‐ 85% COST POOL 1,908,033 1,985,965 1,744,074 2,325,434 2,276,289 ‐ 2% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,797 1,884 8,626 108,770 1,500 ‐ 99% EXPENDITURE 8,720,801 11,574,240 9,600,680 20,380,791 14,746,606 ‐ 28% 1051 CR ‐ENGINEERING
OPER XFERS IN (3,489,599) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (3,489,599) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1054 ENGINEERING GRANTS
INTERGOV FED GRANT (4,819,644) (635,351) (1,939,489) (3,988,000) (3,983,300) 0% INTERGOV STATE GRANT (1,402,781) (1,968,756) (1,874,113) (16,144,425) (10,938,630) ‐ 32% INTERGOV OTHER GRANT ‐ (82,500) (500,000) (314,599) (80,400) ‐ 74% REVENUE (6,222,425) (2,686,607) (4,313,601) (20,447,024) (15,002,330) ‐ 27% PROF & ADMIN 176,437 169,526 4,800 55,000 ‐ ‐ 100% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 11,371 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 8,286,737 3,002,204 2,699,350 27,417,798 9,321,540 ‐ 66% EXPENDITURE 8,474,545 3,171,730 2,704,150 27,472,798 9,321,540 ‐ 66% 1055 ENCROACHMENT SVCS
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (932,819) (972,367) (739,983) (838,000) (890,000) 6% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (6,426) (51,110) (74,739) ‐ ‐ ‐ CHARGES FOR SERVICES (364,951) (324,226) (316,646) (227,000) (550,000) 142% REVENUE (1,304,196) (1,347,703) (1,131,368) (1,065,000) (1,440,000) 35% SALARIES AND WAGES 269,747 305,548 224,004 458,238 533,693 16% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 227,094 241,674 161,628 264,071 359,635 36% PROF & ADMIN ‐ ‐ ‐ 925 45,100 4776% OTHER OPERATING 33,902 1,461 279 3,775 17,040 351% UTILITIES 2,816 2,884 2,699 2,900 3,016 4% COST POOL 170,231 172,555 155,293 207,055 181,992 ‐ 12% EXPENDITURE 703,789 724,122 543,903 936,964 1,140,477 22%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE 1200 HOUSING ADMINISTRATION
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (9,550) (41,062) (14,970) (25,000) (25,000) 0% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (419) (16,243) (29,047) (3,741) (50,092) 1239% OTHER REVENUE (576,941) (584,892) (558,201) (618,299) (555,713) ‐ 10% OPER XFERS IN (553,512) (38,305) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (1,140,422) (680,503) (602,219) (647,039) (630,805) ‐ 3% SALARIES AND WAGES 48,212 35,091 5,501 249,418 371,675 49% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 41,148 27,488 42,595 93,990 161,174 71% PROF & ADMIN 41,714 23,076 6,260 168,903 54,248 ‐ 68% OTHER OPERATING 71 1,462 856 1,909 1,909 0% UTILITIES 1,054 485 (21) 801 801 0% COST POOL 207,649 123,459 91,008 121,347 122,799 1% OPER XFERS OUT 10,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 349,848 211,061 146,199 636,367 712,606 12% 1201 CDBG
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (6,444) (35,336) (80,205) (19,567) (80,475) 311% LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (140,736) (183,576) (191,591) (142,356) (230,873) 62% REVENUE (147,180) (218,912) (271,796) (161,923) (311,348) 92% SALARIES AND WAGES 5,174 ‐ ‐ ‐ 13,448 ‐ PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 3,573 ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,221 ‐ PROF & ADMIN 11,359 21,338 8,142 18,272 18,272 0% OTHER OPERATING 53 ‐ ‐ 51 51 1% COST POOL 25,641 26,923 20,194 26,923 26,923 0% CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ 346,569 166,798 ‐ 926,481 750,638 ‐ 19% EXPENDITURE 392,369 215,060 28,336 971,726 816,553 ‐ 16% 1202 HOME PROGRAM
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (5,664) (3,135) (6,170) (957) (5,184) 442% LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (8,575) (20,449) ‐ (2,538) ‐ ‐ 100% REVENUE (14,239) (23,584) (6,170) (3,494) (5,184) 48% PROF & ADMIN ‐ 374 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE OPER XFERS OUT 510,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 510,000 374 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1203 NEIGHBORHOOD STAB(NP)
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (2) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS ‐ ‐ ‐ (15,000) (15,000) 0% OPER XFERS IN (10,000) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (10,002) ‐ ‐ (15,000) (15,000) 0% SALARIES AND WAGES 23,794 2,373 ‐ ‐ 13,448 ‐ PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 13,422 1,320 ‐ ‐ 7,221 ‐ PROF & ADMIN 20,120 4,797 3,117 9,500 9,500 0% EXPENDITURE 57,335 8,489 3,117 9,500 30,169 218% 1205 EMPLOYMENT & TRAINING
OTHER REVENUE (942) (117) (185) ‐ ‐ ‐ INTERGOV FED GRANT (1,087,582) (2,949,691) (1,326,963) (3,779,035) (3,169,355) ‐ 16% INTERGOV STATE GRANT (470,210) (479,581) (908,596) (3,557,662) (2,500,000) ‐ 30% INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (55,654) (58,271) (20,000) (432,983) (110,000) ‐ 75% OPER XFERS IN (2,189,330) (2,624,137) (1,840,321) (2,852,907) (2,756,777) ‐ 3% REVENUE (3,803,719) (6,111,797) (4,096,065) (10,622,586) (8,536,132) ‐ 20% SALARIES AND WAGES 1,454,237 1,208,354 1,179,251 767,571 1,661,768 116% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 1,012,108 1,005,928 853,213 1,683,712 1,657,906 ‐ 2% PROF & ADMIN 228,535 160,620 42,997 167,639 54,000 ‐ 68% OTHER OPERATING 201,566 62,304 37,828 69,104 53,000 ‐ 23% UTILITIES 9,149 8,623 6,359 2,500 7,500 200% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 195,844 127,467 111,486 1,241,496 679,790 ‐ 45% COST POOL 543,408 518,079 421,270 561,697 701,777 25% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 154,412 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GRANT EXPENDITURES 1,363,483 2,843,541 2,517,014 5,910,556 4,715,554 ‐ 20% EMPLMT & TRNG ALLOC 757 (0) (0) (748,765) (995,163) 33% EXPENDITURE 5,163,499 5,934,917 5,169,417 9,655,510 8,536,132 ‐ 12%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE 1207 COR ‐NEIGHBORHOOD STAB(CITY)
PROC FR SLE PROP ‐ ‐ ‐ (133,664) (133,664) 0% REVENUE ‐ ‐ ‐ (133,664) (133,664) 0% OTHER OPERATING 3,458 3,365 2,338 6,753 6,753 0% EXPENDITURE 3,458 3,365 2,338 6,753 6,753 0% 1208 COR ‐SUCCESSOR HOUSING AGENCY
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (100,466) (180,974) (68,828) (23,752) (121,530) 412% OTHER REVENUE (80,889) (50,251) (36,702) ‐ (64,804) ‐ PROC FR SLE PROP (81,689) (18,943) (19,286) ‐ (34,053) ‐ LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (50,680) (16,468) ‐ (63,448) (15,680) ‐ 75% REVENUE (313,724) (266,635) (124,815) (87,200) (236,067) 171% SALARIES AND WAGES 88,209 114,672 98,024 130,698 117,336 ‐ 10% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 55,645 73,563 59,817 79,756 61,661 ‐ 23% PROF & ADMIN ‐ ‐ ‐ 200 200 0% CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,000,000 1,500,000 50% OPER XFERS OUT 43,512 38,305 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 187,365 226,540 157,841 1,210,655 1,679,197 39% 1209 CAL ‐HOME GRANT FUND
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (36,922) (40,082) (47,942) (9,931) (57,058) 475% LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS (156,365) (185,494) (112,020) (80,389) (134,530) 67% REVENUE (193,287) (225,576) (159,962) (90,321) (191,588) 112% SALARIES AND WAGES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 13,448 ‐ PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,221 ‐ PROF & ADMIN 633 5,671 1,322 1,200 1,200 0% CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ ‐ 164,000 ‐ 500,000 395,000 ‐ 21% EXPENDITURE 633 169,671 1,322 501,200 416,869 ‐ 17% 1302 HOUSNG IN LIEU FEE ‐ DEVELOPER
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (16,752) (542,464) (828,828) (495,269) (651,665) 32% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (9,567) (41,956) (47,090) (566) (81,757) 14353%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE REVENUE (26,319) (584,420) (875,918) (495,834) (733,422) 48% SALARIES AND WAGES 35,691 98,803 67,089 89,452 90,440 1% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 20,132 62,022 39,514 52,685 47,220 ‐ 10% PROF & ADMIN 279,643 ‐ ‐ 15,000 15,000 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,150,000 600,000 ‐ 48% CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ ‐ ‐ ‐ 850,000 500,000 ‐ 41% OPER XFERS OUT ‐ ‐ ‐ 480,000 480,000 0% EXPENDITURE 335,467 160,825 106,603 2,637,137 1,732,660 ‐ 34% 1303 KIDS FIRST INITIATIVE
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (3,443) (66,257) (128,094) ‐ ‐ ‐ OPER XFERS IN (1,929,172) (4,121,294) (4,839,817) (6,453,091) (7,462,513) 16% REVENUE (1,932,615) (4,187,551) (4,967,911) (6,453,091) (7,462,513) 16% SALARIES AND WAGES (2,582) 123,028 162,004 (59,593) 469,529 ‐ 888% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 915 78,269 86,951 64,548 152,911 137% PROF & ADMIN 620,858 1,492,707 611,722 6,103,579 631,000 ‐ 90% OTHER OPERATING 572 1,986 12,445 24,000 26,000 8% COST POOL ‐ ‐ 3,340 4,453 2,963 ‐ 33% EXPENDITURE 619,764 1,695,990 876,462 6,136,987 1,282,403 ‐ 79% 1304 EMERGENCY OPE & DISASTR RECVRY
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY ‐ (697) (6,491) ‐ ‐ ‐ INTERGOV FED GRANT (92,885) (1,058) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ INTERGOV STATE GRANT ‐ ‐ (18,463) ‐ ‐ ‐ OPER XFERS IN (167,633) (424,208) (75,000) (75,000) (75,000) 0% REVENUE (260,518) (425,963) (99,954) (75,000) (75,000) 0% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 42,844 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PROF & ADMIN ‐ 55,389 165,091 314,000 ‐ ‐ 100% OTHER OPERATING 7,738 59,655 1,590 ‐ ‐ ‐ ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 29 43 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 50,610 115,087 166,681 314,000 ‐ ‐ 100%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE 1305 PUBLIC ART
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (610,784) (1,528,674) (416,014) (400,000) (400,000) 0% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (2,670) (41,124) (63,393) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (613,454) (1,569,799) (479,407) (400,000) (400,000) 0% SALARIES AND WAGES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 37,000 ‐ PROF & ADMIN 137,378 96,446 45,102 1,150,496 1,316,063 14% OTHER OPERATING ‐ ‐ 2,591 3,005 11,046 268% EXPENDITURE 137,378 96,446 47,693 1,153,500 1,364,109 18% 1306 AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN ACT
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (41,790) (493,777) (626,607) ‐ ‐ ‐ INTERGOV FED GRANT (482,154) (4,130,024) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (523,944) (4,623,801) (626,607) ‐ ‐ ‐ PROF & ADMIN 446,879 789,227 124,471 7,505,473 6,657,546 ‐ 11% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 35,275 1,590,797 337,046 15,930,418 5,672,833 ‐ 64% GRANT EXPENDITURES ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 250,000 ‐ EXPENDITURE 482,154 2,380,024 461,516 23,435,891 12,580,379 ‐ 46% 1307 TRANSFORMATIVE CLIMATE GRANT
INTERGOV STATE GRANT ‐ ‐ ‐ (35,000,000) (10,095,957) ‐ 71% REVENUE ‐ ‐ ‐ (35,000,000) (10,095,957) ‐ 71% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT ‐ ‐ ‐ (0) ‐ ‐ 100% PROF & ADMIN ‐ ‐ 554,751 30,266,216 10,095,957 ‐ 67% OTHER OPERATING ‐ ‐ 18 29,640 ‐ ‐ 100% UTILITIES ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,500 ‐ ‐ 100% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY ‐ ‐ ‐ 5,095,358 ‐ ‐ 100% GRANT EXPENDITURES ‐ ‐ ‐ 80,000 ‐ ‐ 100% EXPENDITURE ‐ ‐ 554,768 35,472,714 10,095,957 ‐ 72% 1308 ENCAMPMENT RESOLUTION FUND
INTERGOV STATE GRANT ‐ ‐ ‐ (8,602,587) (4,301,294) ‐ 50% REVENUE ‐ ‐ ‐ (8,602,587) (4,301,294) ‐ 50%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE PROF & ADMIN ‐ ‐ ‐ 7,777,587 3,876,294 ‐ 50% OTHER OPERATING ‐ ‐ ‐ 800,000 400,000 ‐ 50% UTILITIES ‐ ‐ ‐ 25,000 25,000 0% EXPENDITURE ‐ ‐ ‐ 8,602,587 4,301,294 ‐ 50% 2001 GENERAL CAPITAL FUND
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (162) (3,303) (3,685) ‐ ‐ ‐ OTHER REVENUE (121,500) (237,300) (300,001) (300,000) ‐ ‐ 100% OPER XFERS IN (289,515) (21,666,976) (10,170,218) (13,764,218) ‐ ‐ 100% REVENUE (411,177) (21,907,579) (10,473,904) (14,064,218) ‐ ‐ 100% PROF & ADMIN ‐ ‐ 220,018 1,105,384 ‐ ‐ 100% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 106,088 ‐ 37,444 67,000 ‐ ‐ 100% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 636,757 957,960 1,442,464 37,227,280 12,496,391 ‐ 66% EXPENDITURE 742,845 957,960 1,699,926 38,399,664 12,496,391 ‐ 67% 2002 MEASURE J
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (2,063) (35,493) (41,108) ‐ ‐ ‐ INTERGOV OTHER GRANT (2,993,244) (979,937) (2,133,263) (3,128,821) (2,259,064) ‐ 28% REVENUE (2,995,307) (1,015,431) (2,174,371) (3,128,821) (2,259,064) ‐ 28% PROF & ADMIN 140,000 170,803 ‐ 200,000 200,000 0% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 27,244 ‐ ‐ ‐ 425,000 ‐ ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 1,976,354 1,369,641 634,052 2,920,389 2,268,853 ‐ 22% EXPENDITURE 2,143,597 1,540,444 634,052 3,120,389 2,893,853 ‐ 7% 2007 HARBOR FUND
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (158) (912) (1,222) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (158) (912) (1,222) ‐ ‐ ‐ 2110 IMPACT FEE ‐ PARKS
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (3,888) (12,780) (23,304) (15,096) ‐ ‐ 100% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (555) (3,028) (4,184) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (4,443) (15,808) (27,488) (15,096) ‐ ‐ 100%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE PROF & ADMIN 117 383 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 ‐ ‐ 100% EXPENDITURE 15,117 15,383 15,000 15,000 ‐ ‐ 100% 2111 IMPACT FEE ‐ TRAFFIC
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (274,409) (606,750) (106,720) (71,296) ‐ ‐ 100% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (3,779) (28,635) (40,768) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (278,188) (635,385) (147,488) (71,296) ‐ ‐ 100% PROF & ADMIN 8,232 18,203 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 60,520 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 381,560 7,168 ‐ 29,608 ‐ ‐ 100% OPER XFERS OUT ‐ 52,000 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 450,312 77,371 ‐ 29,608 ‐ ‐ 100% 2113 IMPACT FEE ‐ FIRE
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (31,547) (63,164) (23,740) (15,172) ‐ ‐ 100% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (605) (2,035) (1,972) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (32,152) (65,199) (25,712) (15,172) ‐ ‐ 100% PROF & ADMIN 946 1,895 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ OTHER OPERATING 99,436 84,259 48,175 117,000 65,000 ‐ 44% EXPENDITURE 100,383 86,154 48,175 117,000 65,000 ‐ 44% 2114 IMPACT FEE ‐ POLICE
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (156,379) (49,323) (20,126) (13,088) ‐ ‐ 100% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (1,872) (13,571) (17,081) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (158,251) (62,894) (37,207) (13,088) ‐ ‐ 100% PROF & ADMIN 4,691 1,480 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY ‐ ‐ 101,201 256,201 ‐ ‐ 100% EXPENDITURE 4,691 1,480 101,201 256,201 ‐ ‐ 100% 2115 IMPACT FEE ‐ COMM/AQUATC
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (16,867) (55,980) (90,764) (60,758) ‐ ‐ 100%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (1,781) (10,887) (15,607) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (18,648) (66,867) (106,371) (60,758) ‐ ‐ 100% PROF & ADMIN 506 1,679 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 9,900 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 10,406 1,679 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 2116 IMPACT FEE ‐ PARKS/OPEN
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (75,435) (233,456) (378,450) (253,350) ‐ ‐ 100% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (10,143) (58,431) (80,084) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (85,577) (291,887) (458,534) (253,350) ‐ ‐ 100% PROF & ADMIN 2,263 7,004 76,607 80,000 ‐ ‐ 100% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY ‐ 269,519 ‐ 373,264 500,000 34% EXPENDITURE 2,263 276,523 76,607 453,264 500,000 10% 2117 IMPACT FEE ‐ LIBRARY
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (45,467) (109,583) (106,000) (72,106) ‐ ‐ 100% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (5,731) (35,223) (47,722) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (51,198) (144,806) (153,722) (72,106) ‐ ‐ 100% PROF & ADMIN 1,364 4,356 ‐ ‐ 100,000 ‐ ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 5,263 4,690 65,123 1,204,188 1,698,062 41% EXPENDITURE 6,627 9,045 65,123 1,204,188 1,798,062 49% 2118 IMPACT FEE ‐ HILLTOP
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (110) (634) (848) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (110) (634) (848) ‐ ‐ ‐ 2119 IMPACT FEE ‐ STORM DRAINAGE
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (119,768) (218,407) (36,634) (23,854) ‐ ‐ 100% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (2,675) (19,671) (27,125) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (122,442) (238,077) (63,759) (23,854) ‐ ‐ 100% PROF & ADMIN 3,593 6,552 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 3,593 6,552 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE 2120 IMPACT FEE ‐ WASTEWATER
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (202,890) (395,593) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (8,453) (48,355) (63,843) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (211,343) (443,948) (63,843) ‐ ‐ ‐ PROF & ADMIN 6,087 11,868 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 351,940 164,470 ‐ 923,842 ‐ ‐ 100% EXPENDITURE 358,027 176,338 ‐ 923,842 ‐ ‐ 100% 2125 IRON TRIANGLE/EPA PROGRAM
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (995) (5,018) (6,796) (1,329) (10,088) 659% INTERGOV FED GRANT ‐ (83,046) (60,740) (275,967) (434,954) 58% REVENUE (995) (88,064) (67,537) (277,297) (445,041) 60% SALARIES AND WAGES 17,846 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 10,066 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ CDBG/HOME/HSG PROJ ‐ 83,046 60,740 275,967 434,954 58% EXPENDITURE 27,912 83,046 60,740 275,967 434,954 58% 2126 HOUSING CIP FUND
INTERGOV STATE GRANT ‐ (166,432) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE ‐ (166,432) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 3001 DS ‐ 2005 TAXABLE POB
PROPERTY TAXES (12,659,853) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (11,137) (31,913) (53,781) ‐ ‐ ‐ LOAN/BOND PROCEEDS ‐ (154,140,000) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ OPER XFERS IN (8,089) (4,944) (11,153,663) (11,403,165) (8,431,249) ‐ 26% REVENUE (12,679,079) (154,176,857) (11,207,445) (11,403,165) (8,431,249) ‐ 26% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 11,760,010 166,010,175 11,403,697 11,403,165 8,431,249 ‐ 26% OPER XFERS OUT ‐ 690,145 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 11,760,010 166,700,321 11,403,697 11,403,165 8,431,249 ‐ 26%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE 3002 DS ‐ 99A PENSION OBLIG BOND
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (576) (290) (1,750) ‐ ‐ ‐ OPER XFERS IN (940,700) (2,972,836) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (941,277) (2,973,127) (1,750) ‐ ‐ ‐ DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 949,961 2,892,808 5,133 ‐ 5,500 ‐ EXPENDITURE 949,961 2,892,808 5,133 ‐ 5,500 ‐ 3005 DS ‐ 07 REFNDING&CVC CTR
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (2,174) (8,993) (8,092) ‐ ‐ ‐ CHARGES FOR SERVICES (5,564,718) (5,470,630) (5,106,130) (6,684,183) (6,247,798) ‐ 7% OTHER REVENUE ‐ (3,603) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ OPER XFERS IN (2,406,458) (1,418,372) (1,097,901) (1,463,868) (1,482,453) 1% REVENUE (7,973,350) (6,901,599) (6,212,123) (8,148,051) (7,730,251) ‐ 5% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 7,734,097 7,764,706 5,872,170 7,771,713 7,825,088 1% EXPENDITURE 7,734,097 7,764,706 5,872,170 7,771,713 7,825,088 1% 4001 PORT OF RICHMOND
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES ‐ (44,462) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (663,112) (963,574) (467,469) ‐ (270,652) ‐ OTHER REVENUE (50,039) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ RENTAL INCOME (10,618,352) (10,843,217) (4,928,234) (10,501,891) (5,890,600) ‐ 44% INTERGOV OTHER GRANT ‐ ‐ ‐ (1,003,250) (1,003,250) 0% PROC FR SLE PROP ‐ (496,250) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (11,331,504) (12,347,503) (5,395,702) (11,505,141) (7,164,502) ‐ 38% SALARIES AND WAGES 229,320 144,527 289,186 459,994 539,538 17% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT (1,244,444) 1,995 178,988 268,361 249,500 ‐ 7% PROF & ADMIN 751,508 649,706 618,524 999,394 2,440,794 144% OTHER OPERATING 56,241 42,496 2,566 8,200 11,200 37% UTILITIES 377,241 433,177 340,367 487,100 487,100 0% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 11,160 87,635 70,644 197,400 68,000 ‐ 66% PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 38,080 41,765 43,967 45,000 45,000 0% COST POOL 453,488 476,163 361,394 481,859 511,288 6%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 4,059,828 3,627,415 1,530 5,575,000 6,201,500 11% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 168,873 (4,787) 106,213 4,267,000 ‐ ‐ 100% EXPENDITURE 4,901,295 5,500,092 2,013,379 12,789,308 10,553,920 ‐ 17% 4003 WASTEWATER
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (147,074) (135,306) (106,159) (36,000) (28,000) ‐ 22% FINES & FORFEITURES (750) ‐ ‐ (2,000) (2,000) 0% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (123,270) (844,349) (996,033) ‐ ‐ ‐ CHARGES FOR SERVICES (28,021,153) (30,177,220) (18,073,773) (28,250,000) (30,500,000) 8% REVENUE (28,292,248) (31,156,874) (19,175,965) (28,288,000) (30,530,000) 8% SALARIES AND WAGES 869,036 848,194 939,143 1,508,582 1,769,592 17% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT (642,537) (493,569) 549,093 796,804 795,775 0% PROF & ADMIN 7,043,615 9,370,332 6,337,834 14,522,269 13,218,462 ‐ 9% OTHER OPERATING 5,760 28,395 23,357 378,409 72,400 ‐ 81% UTILITIES 1,073,897 1,208,679 951,161 1,417,049 1,547,264 9% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 326,507 247,952 216,367 542,839 465,500 ‐ 14% COST POOL 774,869 955,041 497,545 663,397 1,082,109 63% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 3,862,298 3,900,551 7,679,460 57,714,702 27,828,000 ‐ 52% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 4,827,498 4,696,455 8,060,310 8,059,725 9,956,258 24% EXPENDITURE 18,140,943 20,762,030 25,254,269 85,603,777 56,735,359 ‐ 34% 4005 MARINA
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (116,926) (230,219) (131,319) ‐ ‐ ‐ RENTAL INCOME (524,651) (541,632) (420,193) (450,000) (450,000) 0% REVENUE (641,577) (771,851) (551,512) (450,000) (450,000) 0% PROF & ADMIN 59,641 36,864 5,312 924,842 ‐ ‐ 100% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 85,456 84,278 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 100,965 96,202 206,815 206,815 206,815 0% OPER XFERS OUT 86,778 86,778 65,082 86,778 86,778 0% EXPENDITURE 332,840 304,122 277,209 1,218,435 293,593 ‐ 76% 4006 STORMWATER
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (45,082) (19,791) (24,452) (75,000) (75,000) 0% FINES & FORFEITURES (7,053) (2,250) (500) ‐ ‐ ‐ USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (3,454) (31,960) (37,837) ‐ ‐ ‐ CHARGES FOR SERVICES (2,004,227) (2,024,622) (1,123,419) (1,930,300) (1,930,300) 0% RENTAL INCOME (5,453) (5,884) (3,900) (4,380) (4,380) 0% INTERGOV STATE GRANT ‐ (1,094,049) ‐ (1,341,278) (1,298,344) ‐ 3% OPER XFERS IN (2,654,027) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (4,719,296) (3,178,556) (1,190,109) (3,350,958) (3,308,024) ‐ 1% SALARIES AND WAGES 26,177 20,473 26,935 113,054 127,195 13% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT (262,087) (73,622) 15,594 70,192 59,249 ‐ 16% PROF & ADMIN 1,270,335 1,531,668 945,956 2,299,871 1,584,583 ‐ 31% OTHER OPERATING (248) 15,498 67,272 112,175 ‐ ‐ 100% UTILITIES 16,867 15,669 26,789 40,000 45,000 13% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS ‐ 499 113,011 226,451 10,000 ‐ 96% COST POOL 113,004 118,654 67,898 90,530 90,530 0% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 45,037 174,378 2,091,449 3,357,945 146,190 ‐ 96% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 73,491 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 1,282,576 1,803,217 3,354,904 6,310,219 2,062,747 ‐ 67% 4008 KCRT ‐ CABLE TELEVIS
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES (1,103,808) (1,037,515) (474,987) (1,250,000) (1,250,000) 0% USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (2,538) (12,905) (15,259) ‐ ‐ ‐ CHARGES FOR SERVICES (65) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (1,106,411) (1,050,420) (490,246) (1,250,000) (1,250,000) 0% SALARIES AND WAGES 469,208 520,728 438,662 505,455 587,896 16% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT (73,462) (124,351) 263,202 340,880 325,900 ‐ 4% PROF & ADMIN 28,152 15,809 17,366 53,800 53,800 0% OTHER OPERATING 34,454 41,155 36,813 37,721 37,721 0% UTILITIES 3,612 3,397 2,754 5,727 5,727 0% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS ‐ 12,627 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 604 ‐ ‐ 604 604 0% COST POOL 196,025 255,827 166,129 221,506 199,699 ‐ 10% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 6,063 9,889 ‐ ‐ 20,000 ‐
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE EXPENDITURE 664,656 735,082 924,926 1,165,693 1,231,347 6% 4101 RHA ‐HSNG CHOICE VOUCHER‐SEC 8
OPER XFERS IN (2,766,180) (1,004,491) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (2,766,180) (1,004,491) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT (2,768,880) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ OTHER OPERATING ‐ 969,225 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ GRANT EXPENDITURES (301,417) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE (3,070,297) 969,225 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4102 RHA ‐HOPE 6
OPER XFERS OUT ‐ 38,683 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE ‐ 38,683 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 4201 RHA ‐CAPITAL FUND
INTERGOV FED GRANT (233,733) (1,687,328) (927,055) (1,458,433) (1,463,024) 0% PROC FR SLE PROP ‐ (401,523) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (233,733) (2,088,851) (927,055) (1,458,433) (1,463,024) 0% PROF & ADMIN 148,560 223,950 76,643 279,250 288,966 3% OTHER OPERATING 3,155 31,727 68,018 170,000 180,000 6% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 54,256 ‐ 148,187 280,308 345,000 23% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY ‐ 47,725 ‐ 25,000 90,000 260% GRANT EXPENDITURES 27,761 46,229 22,429 238,480 47,000 ‐ 80% OPER XFERS OUT 189,976 373,344 390,712 465,395 512,058 10% EXPENDITURE 423,709 722,974 705,989 1,458,433 1,463,024 0% 4401 RHA ‐HACIENDA
OTHER REVENUE ‐ (40) ‐ ‐ (50,000) ‐ PROC FR SLE PROP ‐ ‐ ‐ (57,000) ‐ ‐ 100% OPER XFERS IN (14,882) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (14,882) (40) ‐ (57,000) (50,000) ‐ 12% SALARIES AND WAGES 9,416 11,491 6,653 10,000 ‐ ‐ 100%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT (10,448) 6,320 3,846 5,000 ‐ ‐ 100% OTHER OPERATING ‐ ‐ 72 5,000 5,000 0% UTILITIES ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,000 ‐ ‐ 100% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS ‐ ‐ ‐ 36,000 45,000 25% OPER XFERS OUT ‐ 74,647 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE (1,033) 92,457 10,571 57,000 50,000 ‐ 12% 4404 RHA ‐NEVIN PLAZA
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (285) (114) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ OTHER REVENUE (1,619) (293,252) (465) ‐ (1,050) ‐ RENTAL INCOME (338,334) (238,855) 11,157 ‐ ‐ ‐ INTERGOV FED GRANT (862,800) (630,623) (337,315) (555,995) (576,793) 4% OPER XFERS IN (827,907) (32,142) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (2,030,945) (1,194,987) (326,623) (555,995) (577,843) 4% SALARIES AND WAGES 214,702 237,053 59,804 26,410 ‐ ‐ 100% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT (517,900) 169,360 33,768 13,985 ‐ ‐ 100% PROF & ADMIN 673,354 451,488 40,608 56,670 47,050 ‐ 17% OTHER OPERATING 89,873 74,413 4,083 6,384 1,500 ‐ 77% UTILITIES 642,648 554,320 1,905 2,513 2,000 ‐ 20% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 62,235 36,050 3,682 3,683 ‐ ‐ 100% PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 34,779 32,998 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ COST POOL ‐ 66,677 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ OPER XFERS OUT 1,383,090 ‐ ‐ 429,887 ‐ ‐ 100% EXPENDITURE 2,582,781 1,622,360 143,850 539,532 50,550 ‐ 91% 4405 RHA ‐NYSTROM VILLAGE
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY ‐ (55) (31) ‐ ‐ ‐ OTHER REVENUE (1,046) (204,839) (24,890) (36,800) (15,000) ‐ 59% RENTAL INCOME (196,004) (205,813) (209,159) (277,868) (277,868) 0% INTERGOV FED GRANT (589,902) (473,198) (337,973) (507,132) (507,132) 0% OPER XFERS IN ‐ (461,937) (279,080) (915,101) (365,756) ‐ 60% REVENUE (786,952) (1,345,842) (851,133) (1,736,901) (1,165,756) ‐ 33%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE SALARIES AND WAGES 117,521 276,279 325,614 562,349 209,368 ‐ 63% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT (809,019) 156,501 215,637 433,916 123,604 ‐ 72% PROF & ADMIN 133,271 103,328 138,138 291,860 321,060 10% OTHER OPERATING 40,282 82,307 147,519 174,900 228,050 30% UTILITIES 175,598 169,475 141,868 187,600 224,500 20% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS 109,129 89,686 68,547 164,135 322,600 97% PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 23,186 22,005 35,081 35,860 52,160 45% COST POOL ‐ 30,841 46,809 62,409 74,262 19% OPER XFERS OUT 1,383,090 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 1,173,059 930,423 1,119,213 1,913,029 1,555,604 ‐ 19% 4406 RHA ‐RICHMOND VILLAGE ONE
INTERGOV FED GRANT (233,893) (213,023) (154,863) (237,830) (192,086) ‐ 19% OPER XFERS IN (10,807) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (244,700) (213,023) (154,863) (237,830) (192,086) ‐ 19% SALARIES AND WAGES 7,207 7,298 ‐ 7,473 ‐ ‐ 100% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 3,600 4,138 ‐ 3,496 ‐ ‐ 100% OTHER OPERATING ‐ ‐ 208 209 ‐ ‐ 100% GRANT EXPENDITURES 233,893 194,902 154,863 226,652 192,086 ‐ 15% EXPENDITURE 244,700 206,338 155,071 237,830 192,086 ‐ 19% 4407 RHA ‐RICHMOND VILLAGE TWO
INTERGOV FED GRANT (199,009) (147,525) (91,304) (151,403) (135,616) ‐ 10% REVENUE (199,009) (147,525) (91,304) (151,403) (135,616) ‐ 10% GRANT EXPENDITURES 199,009 139,751 91,304 151,403 135,616 ‐ 10% EXPENDITURE 199,009 139,751 91,304 151,403 135,616 ‐ 10% 4408 RHA ‐RICHMOND VILLAGE THREE
INTERGOV FED GRANT (92,374) (95,346) (82,044) (106,096) (61,959) ‐ 42% REVENUE (92,374) (95,346) (82,044) (106,096) (61,959) ‐ 42% GRANT EXPENDITURES 92,374 92,492 82,044 106,096 61,959 ‐ 42% EXPENDITURE 92,374 92,492 82,044 106,096 61,959 ‐ 42%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE 4501 RHA ‐CENTRAL OFFICE COST CNTR
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES ‐ ‐ (25,000) ‐ ‐ ‐ USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (12) (12) (9) ‐ ‐ ‐ OTHER REVENUE (245,948) (1) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ OPER XFERS IN (307,650) ‐ (111,632) (1,241,263) (146,302) ‐ 88% REVENUE (553,610) (13) (136,641) (1,241,263) (146,302) ‐ 88% SALARIES AND WAGES 105,082 120,193 126,531 22,075 382,044 1631% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT (562,466) 500,698 86,609 64,453 429,158 566% PROF & ADMIN 7,870 1,867 ‐ 1,138,820 ‐ ‐ 100% OTHER OPERATING 703 9,132 1,856 ‐ ‐ ‐ UTILITIES 9,865 10,439 6,507 ‐ ‐ ‐ EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS ‐ 286 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ COST POOL ‐ 15,915 45,581 60,788 597,400 883% OPER XFERS OUT 21,856 42,671 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE (417,089) 701,201 267,085 1,286,136 1,408,603 10% 4502 RHA ‐HOUSING CORPORATION
LICENSES,PRMITS&FEES ‐ ‐ (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) 0% OTHER REVENUE (73,531) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (73,531) ‐ (5,000) (5,000) (5,000) 0% PROF & ADMIN 20 17,239 7,010 14,050 14,050 0% EXPENDITURE 20 17,239 7,010 14,050 14,050 0% 5001 INSURANCE RESERVES
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (241,211) (1,027,666) (1,410,877) ‐ ‐ ‐ CHARGES FOR SERVICES (16,916,342) (17,783,599) (16,098,614) (22,227,589) (28,390,388) 28% OTHER REVENUE (196,864) (817,236) (280,380) ‐ ‐ ‐ INTERGOV FED GRANT ‐ (156,896) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ INTERGOV STATE GRANT (7,217,327) (1,091,739) (1,291,465) ‐ ‐ ‐ REVENUE (24,571,743) (20,877,136) (19,081,336) (22,227,589) (28,390,388) 28% SALARIES AND WAGES 608,246 475,241 425,694 506,482 726,757 43%
Attachment 3 ‐ Non‐General Fund Revenue and Expenditures by Fund FY2021‐22 FY2022 ‐23 FY2023 ‐24 FY2023 ‐24 FY2024 ‐25 PCT ACTUALS ACTUALS ACTUALS REV. BUDGET DRAFT BUDGET CHANGE PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT (2,486,721) (702,549) 197,003 317,505 294,656 ‐ 7% PROF & ADMIN 632,425 659,197 584,235 1,117,652 1,185,200 6% OTHER OPERATING 9,211 9,853 7,693 50,500 50,500 0% PROVISN FOR INS LOSS 21,145,703 12,302,386 12,099,040 21,850,182 25,260,675 16% COST POOL 510,267 533,987 464,412 619,218 563,594 ‐ 9% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 7,744,626 2,389,400 1,234,911 1,590,701 7,000 ‐ 100% OPER XFERS OUT ‐ ‐ ‐ 1,040,000 ‐ ‐ 100% EXPENDITURE 28,163,756 15,667,516 15,012,989 27,092,240 28,088,381 4% 5003 EQUIPMENT SERVICES
USE OF MONEY&PROPRTY (6,789) (116,615) (150,819) ‐ ‐ ‐ CHARGES FOR SERVICES (2,416,000) (3,605,000) (4,263,776) (5,665,733) (6,797,245) 20% PROC FR SLE PROP (101,003) (11,047) (137,020) ‐ (85,000) ‐ CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION (1,358,413) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ OPER XFERS IN (601,018) (478,018) (319,515) (426,018) (426,019) 0% REVENUE (4,483,223) (4,210,680) (4,871,130) (6,091,751) (7,308,264) 20% EQPT & CONTRACT SVCS ‐ 4,518 ‐ 155,000 ‐ ‐ 100% ASSET/CAPITAL OUTLAY 2,057,176 1,959,124 6,968,519 12,580,182 7,285,000 ‐ 42% DEBT SVC EXPENDITURE 72,836 62,791 244,514 326,018 326,018 0% CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION (1,358,413) ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 771,600 2,026,433 7,213,033 13,061,200 7,611,018 ‐ 42% 5008 COMPENSATED ABSENCES
OTHER REVENUE (2,600,000) (2,600,000) (1,950,001) (2,600,000) (3,000,000) 15% REVENUE (2,600,000) (2,600,000) (1,950,001) (2,600,000) (3,000,000) 15% SALARIES AND WAGES 2,397,133 2,403,859 1,481,138 2,600,000 3,000,000 15% PYRLL/FRINGE BENEFIT 34,482 34,585 22,861 ‐ ‐ ‐ EXPENDITURE 2,431,615 2,438,444 1,504,000 2,600,000 3,000,000 15% NON GF ‐ REVENUE (171,717,575.25) (354,746,248.42) (142,924,667.95) (304,721,348.29) (235,592,315.27) ‐ 23% NON GF ‐ EXPENDITURE 137,905,679.86 304,704,246.59 146,736,022.22 455,140,612.82 294,662,686.21 ‐ 35% NON GF ‐ GRANT TOTAL (33,811,895.39) (50,042,001.83) 3,811,354.27 150,419,264.53 59,070,370.94
Attachment 4 - Multi-Year Comparative Position Listing
Department Revised
FY22-23
Adopted
FY23-24
Revised
FY23-24
Draft
FY24-25
CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Admin Services Coordinator 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Assistant City Attorney 2.0 3.0 2.0 2.0
Chief Assistant City Attorney 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
City Attorney
(Currently Contract Position) 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
Office Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Paralegal 1.0 1.0
Law Office Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Assistant City Attorney 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
CITY CLERK'S OFFICE
City Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Deputy City Clerk 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
CITY COUNCIL
Councilmember 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Project Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Administrative Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
Deputy City Manager 2.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Admin Chief 1.0 1.0
Grants Manager 1.0 1.0
City Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Executive Assistant to the City Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Management Analyst/Associate Mgmt Analyst
(Communications Analyst) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Management Analyst/Associate Mgmt Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Sr. Admin Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 5.0 5.0 7.0 7.0
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (Building Services, Code Enforcement, Housing, & Planning) Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Associate Administrative Analyst (1 Term Position) 1.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Building Inspector 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0
Building Inspector Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Building Official 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Code Enforcement Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Code Enforcement Officer I/II 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Deputy Building Official 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Director of Community Development 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Housing Programs Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0
Housing Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Housing Services Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Industrial Building Inspector 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Permit Technician I/II 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Plan Checking Engineer 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Assistant/Associate Planner 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0
Planning Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Planning Technician I/II 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Principal Planner 1.0 1.0
Project Coordinator
(Term Position) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Attachment 4 - Multi-Year Comparative Position Listing
Department Revised
FY22-23
Adopted
FY23-24
Revised
FY23-24
Draft
FY24-25
Senior Accountant 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Senior Administrative Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Building Inspector 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Senior Planner 4.0 4.0 3.0 3.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 38.0 41.0 42.0 42.0
COMMUNITY POLICE REVIEW COMMISSION
Administrative Analyst 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
Total Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1
COMMUNITY SERVICES (Administration)
Deputy City Manager (Moved from City Manager Office) 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Finance Manager II 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
COMMUNITY SERVICES (Employment & Training)
Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Admin Trainee(3 Term Positions) 1.0 1.0 4.0 4.0
Administrative Analyst 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Administrative Services Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Deputy Director of Community Services 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Workforce Program Manager 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Workforce Specialist I/II 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
Director of Community Services 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Office Assistant 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Project Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Accountant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Workforce Program Specialist 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 27.0 27.0 29.0 29.0
COMMUNITY SERVICES (Library)
Library Services Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Circulation Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Deputy Director of Community Services - Library 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Executive Assistant I/II 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Family Literacy Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Head of Reference 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Learning Center Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Librarian I/II 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Library Assistant I/II 8.0 8.0 8.0 8.0
Library Associate 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Library Information Systems Support Technician 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Literacy Program Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Office Assistant 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Senior Library Assistant 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Senior Administrative Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Volunteer Tutor/Learner Coordinator 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Total Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) 34.7 35.7 35.7 35.7
COMMUNITY SERVICES
(Office of Neighborhood Safety)
Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Deputy Director of Community Services - ONS 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Management Analyst/ Associate Management Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Neighborhood Change Agents 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
ONS Field Coordinator 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Attachment 4 - Multi-Year Comparative Position Listing
Department Revised
FY22-23
Adopted
FY23-24
Revised
FY23-24
Draft
FY24-25
ONS Program Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0
COMMUNITY SERVICES (Recreation)
Accounting Asst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Administrative Assistant (1 Term Position) 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Administrative Services Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0
Admin Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Associate Admin Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Auditorium Aide 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
Deputy Director of Community Services - Recreation 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Development Project Manager II 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Executive Asssistant I/II 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Library Associate
(Tool Lending Library) 2.0 2.0 2.0
Lifeguard 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Registration Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Recreation Program Coordinator 8.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Recreation Program Specialist 4.2 3.2 3.2 3.2
Recreation Supervisor 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Senior Lifeguard 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 30.0 34.0 35.0 35.0
COMMUNITY SERVICES (Community Crisis Response Program CCRP) Administrative Analyst/Associate 1.0 1.0
Community Intervention Specialists 8.0 8.0
Mental Health Clinician 1.0 1.0
Project Manager II - CCRP Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 0.0 1.0 11.0 11.0
COMMUNITY SERVICES (Transportation)
Associate Administrative Analyst 1.0 0.0 0.0
R-transit Driver 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
R-transit Driver Leadworker 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Project Manager I/II 2.0 2.0 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 5.0 6.0 4.0 4.0
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND YOUTH
Community Services Technician I/II 1.0 1.0
Management Analyst / Associate Management Analyst 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Project Manager I/II 1.0 0.0 0.0
Senior Management Analyst 1.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 2.0 3.0 5.0 5.0
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (Arts & Culture,
Arts & Culture Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0
Development Project Manager II 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Director of Economic Development 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Sr. Admin Analyst 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Economic Development Coordinator 1.0 0.0 0.0
Environmental Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Executive Assistant I/II 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Management Analyst/Associate Management Analyst 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 Port Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Port Marketing/Operations Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Attachment 4 - Multi-Year Comparative Position Listing
Department Revised
FY22-23
Adopted
FY23-24
Revised
FY23-24
Draft
FY24-25
Project Manager I/II 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Sr. Business Assistance Officer 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Total Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) 12.0 11.0 13.0 13.0
FINANCE
Accountant I/II 7.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Accounting Assistant 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Accounting Manager 2.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Administrative Services Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Budget Administrator 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Budget Analyst l/II 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Business License Field Inspector 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Business License Specialist 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0
Buyer I/II 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Project Manager I
(Contract Compliance) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Chief Accountant 1.0 0.0 0.0
Deputy City Manager
(Moved from City Manager Office) 1.0 1.0 1.0
Deputy Director of Finance 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Director of Finance 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Payroll Coordinator 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Payroll Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Accountant 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0
Senior Budget Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Buyer 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 32.0 35.0 35.0 35.0
FIRE
SWORN
Fire Chief 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Battalion Chief 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Deputy Fire Chief 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Deputy Fire Marshal 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Fire Captain 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0
Fire Engineer 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0
Fire Fighter
(Temporary Increase of One FTE - Authorized 30) 30.0 30.0 31.0 31.0 Fire Inspector I/II (Temporary Increase of One FTE - Authorized 4) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Fire Marshal 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Sub-total Sworn 91.0 91.0 92.0 92.0
NON-SWORN
Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Administrative Services Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Associate Admin Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Emergency Services Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Emergency Services Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Sub-total Non-Sworn 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 96.0 96.0 97.0 97.0
HUMAN RESOURCES
Admin Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Employee Benefits Analyst I 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Human Resources Manager 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Director of Human Resourecs 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Human Resources Technician I/II/III 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Human Resources Analyst I/II 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0
Attachment 4 - Multi-Year Comparative Position Listing
Department Revised
FY22-23
Adopted
FY23-24
Revised
FY23-24
Draft
FY24-25
Human Resources Analyst Principal 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Human Resources Analyst Senior 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Total Full-Time Equivalents (FTEs) 15.0 15.0 15.0 15.0
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Business Systems Analyst I 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Cable TV Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Cable TV Programming Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Duplicating/Mail Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Information Technology Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Information Technology Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Information Technology Manager 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Information Technology Support Specialist I/II 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Network & Systems Security Officer 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Network & Systems Specialist I/II 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Cable TV Production Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Programmer Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Telecommunications Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 14.0 14.0 14.0 14.0
MAYOR'S OFFICE
Mayor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Administrative Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Associate Management Analyst 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Executive Assistant I 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0
POLICE
SWORN
Asst Police Chief 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Police Captain 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Police Chief 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Police Lieutenant 8.0 8.0 9.0 9.0
Police Officer 107.0 107.0 109.0 109.0
Police Officer Trainee 2.0 2.0 0.0 0.0
Police Sergeant 23.0 23.0 23.0 23.0
Sub-total Sworn 145.0 145.0 146.0 146.0
NON-SWORN
Administrative Assistant 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Assistant Police Property Technician 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Administrative Services Coordinator 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
CCTV Wireless & Systems Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Civilian Admin Manager 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Community Services Officer 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Communications Dispatcher I/II/III 17.0 17.0 17.0 17.0
Communications Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Communications Shift Supervisor 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Crime Analysis Technician 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Crime Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Crime Prevention Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Crime Prevention Specialist 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Crime Scene Technician 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Jailer 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0
Network and Systems Specialist I/II 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Attachment 4 - Multi-Year Comparative Position Listing
Department Revised
FY22-23
Adopted
FY23-24
Revised
FY23-24
Draft
FY24-25
Office Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Parking Enforcement Representative 5.0 5.0 6.0 6.0
Police Admin Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0
Police Property Technician 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Police Records & Property Mgr. 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Police Records Specialist 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0
Project Manager I/II 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Community Engagement Mgr 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Public Safety Technology Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Accountant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Admin Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Systems Administrator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Sub-total Non-Sworn 68.0 67.0 68.0 68.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 213.0 212.0 214.0 214.0
PUBLIC WORKS
Administrative Assistant 3.0 3.0 4.0 4.0
Associate Admin Analyst 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Associate Civil Engineer 1.0 1.0
Building Trades Worker I/II/Senior 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Capital Projects Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Carpenter 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Combo Equipment Mechanic 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
Streets Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Construction Inspector I/II 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Custodial Maintenance Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Deputy Public Works Director 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Development Project Manager I/II 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Electrical Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Electrician I/II 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Junior/Assistant Engineer 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0
Equipment Mechanic III/Senior 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Equipment Operator 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0
Equipment Parts Specialist 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Equipment Services Superintendent 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Equipment Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Executive Assistant I/II 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Gardener 3.0 3.0 2.0 2.0
Groundskeeper 13.0 13.0 14.0 14.0
Maintenance Leadworker 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Maintenance Worker I/II 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0
Office Aide 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Office Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Painter 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Parks & Landscaping Superintendent 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Parks Construction & Maintenance Worker 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Parks Supervisor 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Project Manager I/II 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Director of Public Works 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
PW Facilities Maint. Superintendent 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
PW Streets Maint. Superintendent 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Public Works Abatement Superintendent 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Civil Engineer 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0
Senior Electrician 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Stationary Engineer 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0
Attachment 4 - Multi-Year Comparative Position Listing
Department Revised
FY22-23
Adopted
FY23-24
Revised
FY23-24
Draft
FY24-25
Stationary Engineer Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Tree Leadworker 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Facilities Maintenance Worker I/II 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 132.2 131.2 135.2 135.2
PUBLIC WORKS (Water Resource Recovery)
Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Admin Services Coordinator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Deputy Director of Public Works - City Engineer 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Infrastructure Administrator 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Environmental Compliance Inspector 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Environmental Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Executive Assistant I/II 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Project Manager I/II 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Water Resources Division Manager 1.0 1.0
Project Coordinator 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Senior Accountant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Civil Engineer 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Environmental Inspector 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0
RENT CONTROL
Administrative Assistant 3.0 3.0 1.0 1.0
Compliance Specialist 2.0 2.0
Deputy Director Rent Program 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Executive Director Rent Program 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Hearing Examiner Rent Program 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
General Counsel Rent Program 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Office Assistant 2.0 2.0
Rent Program Analyst I/II 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0
Senior Admin Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Management Analyst 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Staff Attorney Rent Program 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents(FTEs) 12.0 12.0 14.0 14.0
RICHMOND HOUSING AUTHORITY
Administrative Assistant 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Building Maintenance Supervisor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Executive Director Housing Authority 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Resident Housing Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Development Project Manager 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Senior Property Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Senior Resident Housing Manager 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Total Full-Time E
quivalents (FTEs) 7.0 6.0 5.0 5.0
GRAND TOTAL ALL DEPARTMENTS 732.0 743.0 769.0 769.0
DRAFT Attachment 5 - Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Queued Planning Design Bid/Award Construction Closeout
Count
Project
ID Project Phase Project Name
City Project
Manager
Consultant Project
Management
03/05/24 CC Priority
Criteria Project Cost
$ Prior Year
Actuals (Start to
FY2022-23
Period 13)
$ FY2023-24
Actuals &
Encumbrance
Q1-Q3
FY2023-24
Projected
Encumbrances
Q4
$
FY2024-25
$
FY2025-26
$
FY2026-27
$
FY2027-28
$
FY2028-29
$
Out Year
Progress %
Complete
(Excluding
Closeout)
Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 1 29120 Design 13th Street Complete Street Josef Munoz NA Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 5,291,466.00 763,784.92 128,546.69 106,075.00 3,888,059.39 405,000.00 20% 2 23015 Planning
2560-2622 and 2566 Macdonald Ave
Building Improvements - Needs Assessment
Only
Wendy
Wellbrock NA Health & Safety 50,000.00 - - 50,000.00 2% 3 29105 Closeout 37th St Improvement - Closeout Only Robert Armijo Professional PM Services Needed Funding Obligation 50,000.00 - - 50, 000.00 0%
4 23047
Design 6th St and Macdonald Ave Traffic Signal Light
Improvement Ken Cheng NA Health & Safety 446,430.00 446,430.00 40% 5 23053 Construction Abatement, Fencing, Boulder, K-Rails, Other Tawfic N. Halaby NA Health & Safety 75,000.00 - 75,000.00 60% 6 01A04 Ongoing
Program
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA),
Sidewalk, Curbs Jose Valenzuela Professional PM
Services Needed
Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life, Health &
Safety
8,785,148.83 5,208,250.83 408,808.00 3,168,090.00 NA 7 23011 Design Area FM CAP Craig Murray NA Legal Compliance 924,842.00 21,313.04 11,911.68 891,617.28 25% 8 23G06 Construction ATP Quick Build Cutting/Hoffman Ken Cheng NA Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 1,205,252.68 340,763.77 422,699.15 441,789.76 70% 9 23G07 Construction ATP Quick Build Harbour Way S. Cycle Track Ken Cheng NA Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 325,000.00 320,876.15 4,123.85 70% 10 CSA20 Construction Auditorium Convention Center Upgrades Josef Munoz N A Quality of Life 1,500,000.00 699,110.34 305,020.52 495,869.14 85% 11 23042 Queued Barrett Ave Road Improvements Daniel Chavarria Professional PM Services Needed
Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 1,719,520.00 - - 315,000.00 1,404,520.00 0% 12 23040 Queued Bayview to BART Robert Armijo Professional PM Services Needed
Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 1,944,122.00 - - 270,000.00 1,674,122.00 0% 13 23045 Construction Booker T. Anderson Center Infrastructure Josef Munoz NA Quality of Life 1,000,000.00 - 81,000.00 516,491.46 402,508.54 60% 14 23008 Closeout Booker T. Anderson Community Center Fire Restoration Josef Munoz NA
Funding Obligation,
Health & Safety, Quality
of Life
3,867,228.41 2,670,582.75 1,196,645.66 - 90% 15 AR247 Construction Booker T. Anderson Community Center HVAC Renovation and Rebuild Josef Munoz NA Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 500,000.00 - - 410,120.46 89,879.54 60% 16 23006 Design Boorman Park Revitalization Jene Levine- Snipes mack5 Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 6,950,000.00 411,756.81 403,006.67 6,135,236.52 20% 17 23G02 Queued Bridge Preventive Maintenance Josef Munoz APM Funding Obligation, Health & Safety 2,312,679.00 34,480.10 19,000.00 77,370.50 50,000.00 2,131,828.40 17% 18 36028 Planning Cafeteria Building at Shipyard #3 Charles Gerard CSW Legal Compliance, Housing/Facility 141,894.00 - - 67,000.00 74,894.00 0% 19 23033 Design Carlson Crosstown Project Phase II Ken Cheng NA Quality of Life 4,134,927.00 - 61,955.00 300,000.00 3,772,972.00 5% 20 23051 Ongoing
Program
Civic Center Plaza Landscaping and Citywide
Plant & Median Materials Tawf
ic N. Halaby NA Quality of Life 200,000.00 - - 200,000.00 NA 21 01L10 Design Cogeneration - Design Only Mary Phelps NA Legal Compliance 4,548,016.00 874,174.08 673,841.92 3,000,000.00 20% 22 23034 Queued Corp Yard Bathroom Remodel Tawfic N. Halaby Professional PM Services Needed Health & Safety 175,000.00 - - 175,000.00 22% 23 23052 Planning Corp Yard Fence - Design Only Tawfic N. Halaby Professional PM Services Needed Health & Safety 37,500.00 - - 37,500.00 0% 24 23012 Queued Corp Yard Fuel Sites Upgrades Tawfic N. Halaby Professional PM Services Needed
Legal Compliance, Health
& Safety 1,680,000.00 122,729.66 - 1,557,270.34 25% 25 22103 Design Cutting Blvd. & Harbour Way S. Sewer Line Wet Weather Improvement Project Mary Phelps NA Health & Safety 2,000,000.00 - - 2,000,000.00 20% 26 23029 Construction Dirt World Bike Park Wendy
Wellbrock mack5 Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 1,170,000.00 131,612.38 888,568.00 149,819.62 60% 20292024 2025 2026 2027 2028
Last Revised: 4/24/2024 1 of 4915
DRAFT Attachment 5 - Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Queued Planning Design Bid/Award Construction Closeout
Count
Project
ID Project Phase Project Name
City Project
Manager
Consultant Project
Management
03/05/24 CC Priority
Criteria Project Cost
$ Prior Year
Actuals (Start to
FY2022-23
Period 13)
$ FY2023-24
Actuals &
Encumbrance
Q1-Q3
FY2023-24
Projected
Encumbrances
Q4
$
FY2024-25
$
FY2025-26
$
FY2026-27
$
FY2027-28
$
FY2028-29
$
Out Year
Progress %
Complete
(Excluding
Closeout)
Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 20292024 2025 2026 2027 2028
27 01Z10 Construction Dornan Drive Force Main Reha bilitation Jeff Barich NA Health & Safety 4,000,000.00 - 336,180.01 3,663,819.99 75% 28 23050 Design Dornan Tunnel Lighting - Design Only Josef Munoz Professional PM Services Needed Quality of Life 40,000.00 - - 15,000.00 25,000.00 15% 29 01U10 Construction Ferry Point Pump Station Jeff Barich NA Health & Safety 3,600,000.00 1,761,020.22 1,493,163.88 345,815.90 75% 30 05G01 Queued Fire Station 66 - Gender Specific Restrooms Josef Munoz Professional PM Services Needed
Funding Obligation,
Housing/Facility 1,279,645.00 499,592.61 - 780,052.39 5% 31 22A02 Construction Flood Risk Reduction - Rheem Creek Jeff Barich NA Funding Obligation, Health & Safety 2,248,844.00 94,048.70 1,964,409.95 190,385.35 45% 32 22A01 Construction Full Trash Ca pture Facilities Jeff Barich NA Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 8,178,133.33 5,730,977.10 2,426,372.49 20,783.74 80% 33 29125 Construction Greening the Yellow Brick Road Wendy Wellbrock APM Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 4,100,000.00 2,704,131.70 1,395,868.30 80% 34 23023 Construction Greenway Rehab and Bike Education Tawfic N. Halaby Professional PM Services Needed
Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 124,810.00 19,600.00 105,210.00 60% 35 01X10 Construction Grit and Aeration Replacement Jeff Barich NA Health & Safey 54,000,000.00 41,159,498.02 5,760,079.23 7,080,422.75 80% 36 23004 Construction Harbour 8 Park Extension Wendy
Wellbrock mack5 Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 9,150,000.00 3,279,231.61 5,870,768.39 40% 37 23022 Design Harbour Way & Wright Section 130 Ken Cheng NA Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 1,200,000.00 3,074.46 255,056.00 941,869.54 11% 38 23014 Queued Hilltop Fire Station Card Reader Josef Munoz NA Housing/Facility 70,000.00 - - 70,000.00 0% 39 29110 Design I-80 Central Interchange Phase II Ken Cheng NA Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 13,954,000.00 1,997,640.04 660,163.18 3,999,124.59 7,297,072.19 25% 40 23041 Bid/Award Lincoln Safe Routes to School Ken Cheng NA Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 761,880.00 - 28,747.50 600,000.00 133,132.50 40% 41 23043 Queued Macdonald Ave Pedestrian Crossing Daniel Chavarria Professional PM Services Needed
Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 274,560.00 - - 50,000.00 224,560.00 0% 42 23039 Queued McBryde Safe Routes to Parks Robert Armijo Professional PM Services Needed
Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 1,285,730.00 - - 260,000.00 1,025,730.00 0% 43 07001 Closeout Nevin Ave. from 19th to 27th St - Closeout Only Robert Armijo APM Funding Obligation 50,000.00 - - 50,000.00 0% 44 AR232 Queued Nevin Center HVAC - ARPA Josef Munoz Pr ofessional PM
Services Needed
Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 1,075,000.00 10,250.00 - 1,064,750.00 17% 45 PM902 Construction Point Molate Cottage Roof Stabilization Wendy Wellbrock NA Health & Safety 878,160.00 - 348,262.00 513,000.00 16,898.00 40% 46 36009 Planning Point Potrero Marine Terminal (PPMT)
Electrical And Watering Metering Charles Gerard CSW Housing/Facility 365,000.00 - - 365,000.00 10% 47 36011 Construction Point Potrero Marine Terminal (PPMT) Electrical Maintenance Charles Gerard CSW Housing/Facility 60,000.00 - - 60,000.00 30% 48 36012 Bid/Award Point Potrero Marine Terminal (PPMT) Pavement Maintenance Charles Gerard CSW Housing/Facility 150,000.00 - - 150,000.00 30% 49 36010 Construction Process Building Window Repair Charles Gerard CSW Housing/Facility, Health & Safety 350,000.00 - - 350,000.00 90% 50 36014 Bid/Award Processing Building Ventilation Charles Gerard CSW Housing/Facility, Health & Safety 55,000.00 - - 55,000.00 30% 51 AR233 Queued Recreation Center HVAC - ARPA Josef Munoz Professional PM Services Needed
Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 1,140,000.00 25,025.00 - 1,114,975.00 12% 52 AR231 Design Revitalizing the Historic Richmond Main Library
Wendy
Wellbrock NA Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 29,933,657.00 7,080.00 3,110,026.00 298,716.00 26,517,835.00 10% 53 23031 Design Richmond Art and Lighting Jene Levine-
Snipes CSW Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 4,000,000.00 - 485,526.00 3,514,474.00 10% Last Revised: 4/24/2024 2 of 4916
DRAFT Attachment 5 - Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Queued Planning Design Bid/Award Construction Closeout
Count
Project
ID Project Phase Project Name
City Project
Manager
Consultant Project
Management
03/05/24 CC Priority
Criteria Project Cost
$ Prior Year
Actuals (Start to
FY2022-23
Period 13)
$ FY2023-24
Actuals &
Encumbrance
Q1-Q3
FY2023-24
Projected
Encumbrances
Q4
$
FY2024-25
$
FY2025-26
$
FY2026-27
$
FY2027-28
$
FY2028-29
$
Out Year
Progress %
Complete
(Excluding
Closeout)
Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 20292024 2025 2026 2027 2028
54 23030 Design Richmond Communities Clean Collaborative - 7th St Ken Cheng NA Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 600,112.00 - - 600,112.00 30% 55 23030 Design Richmond Communities Clean Collaborative - Boorman Park Site Remediation
Jene Levine-
Snipes mack5 Funding Obligation,
Health & Safety 5,503,742.00 215,669.30 574,996.86 4,713,075.84 10% 56 36005 Bid/Award Riggers Loft Painting Charles Gerard CSW Housing/Facility 285,000.00 8,243.00 - 276,757.00 40% 57 22235 Ongoing
Program Sanitary Sewer Brick Manhole Repairs Mary Phelps NA Health & Safety 718,707.10 468,707.10 - 250,000.00 NA 58 22230 Ongoing
Program Sanitary Sewer Repairs Mary Phelps NA Health & Safety 7,949,330.54 5,214,261.82 877,357.91 1,857,710.81 - NA 59 23037 Construction Santa Rita Road Stabilization Project Ken Cheng NA Health & Safety 1,040,000.00 - 925,742.00 114,258.00 80% 60 01A14 Bid/Award SF Bay Trail - Pt. Molate Robert Armijo NA Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 7,688,264.00 6,663,137.64 11,475.72 1,013,650.64 30% 61 CSA27 Queued Shields-Reid Community Center HVAC
System Upgrade Josef Munoz Professional PM
Services Needed
Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 922,400.00 22,400.00 - 900,000.00 17% 62 23028 Bid/Award Shields-Reid Park Revitalization Jene Levine- Snipes mack5 Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 8,000,000.00 178,063.13 1,755,174.70 6,066,762.17 35% 63 23046 Planning Soccer Fields-Restrooms-Parks Daniel Chavarria NA Quality of Life 7,703,008.00 - - 120,000.00 7,583,008.00 10% 64 22104 Queued South 33rd Wet Weather Sewer Line
(Cancelled) Mary Phelps NA Health & Safety 2,000,000.00 - - 2,000,000.00 NA 65 05C01 Construction Station 63 - Maintenance & Assessment Tawfic N. Halaby NA Housing/Facility 300,000.00 16,980.81 - 283,019.19 66 22107 Construction Stormwater Infrastructure Mary Phelps NA Health & Safety 750,000.00 - - 750,000.00 NA 67 01A05 Ongoing Progra
mStreet Paving Tawfic N. Halaby NA Quality of Life 59,260,539.57 52,650,015.01 3,800,069.56 2,810,455.00 NA 68 SB115 Construction Street Paving - SB1 - Cutting Harbour Way S.
Bikeway Ken Cheng NA Quality of Life 1,160,253.32 626,300.69 454,235.63 79,717.00 70% 69 23048 Planning Street Sweeping Signs Tawfic N. Halaby NA Quality of Life 550,000.00 - - 100,000.00 450,000.00 NA 70 01C09 Ongoing Progra
mSurface Drainage Daniel Chavarria NA Quality of Life 997,487.79 743,187.79 45,700.00 208,600.00 NA 71 16G17 Design TCC/ADA Accessible Garden Beatriz Guerrero Urban Tilth Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 1,036,695.00 207,339.00 207,339.00 207,339.00 207,339.00 207,339.00 5% 72 16G16 Design TCC/E-Bike Lending Library Beatriz Guerrero Rich City Rides Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 3,248,719.49 649,743.90 649,743.90 649,743.90 649,743.90 649,743.90 5% 73 16G20 Design TCC/E-Bike Share Beatriz Guerrero Bike Today Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 1,126,717.19 225,343.44 225,343.44 225,343.44 225,343.44 225,343.44 20% 74 16G11 Design TCC/Neighborhood Complete Streets Josef Munoz NA Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 5,181,173.00 - 15,815.00 427,604.00 4,737,754.00 10% 75 16G12 Design TCC/Richmond Wellness Trail Phas e II Beatriz Guerrero Trust for Public Land Funding Obligation, Quality of Life 4,816,153.60 - 100,000.00 863,230.72 963,230.72 963,230.72 963, 230.72 963,230.72 10% 76 23021 Construction Terminal 4 Wharf Removal Robert Armijo NA Funding Obligation 9,612,605.00 451,506.07 7,688,847.91 1,472,251.02 75% 77 36020 Design Terminals 7 & 8 Dredging Charles Gerard CSW Housing/Facility 65,000.00 - - 65,000.00 10% 78 36007 Design Terminals 7 & 8 Electrification Charles Gerard CSW Legal Compliance 1,700,000.00 - - 1,700,000.00 15% 79 23035 Ongoing Progra
mTraffic Calming Program FY 23-24 Josef Munoz NA Health & Safety, Quality of Life 1,700,000.00 48,528.23 80,881.32 150,000.00 1,420,590.45 NA 80 23049 Design Via Verdi Mitigation - Design Only Jeff Barich NA Legal Compliance 400,000.00 - - 400,000.00 15% 81 01M10 Construction WWTP Sludge Thickener Jeff Barich NA Health & Safety 13,597,400.00 979,357.21 76,423.38 12,541,619.41 45% Last Revised: 4/24/2024 3 of 4917
DRAFT Attachment 5 - Five-Year Capital Improvement Plan Queued Planning Design Bid/Award Construction Closeout
Count
Project
ID Project Phase Project Name
City Project
Manager
Consultant Project
Management
03/05/24 CC Priority
Criteria Project Cost
$ Prior Year
Actuals (Start to
FY2022-23
Period 13)
$ FY2023-24
Actuals &
Encumbrance
Q1-Q3
FY2023-24
Projected
Encumbrances
Q4
$
FY2024-25
$
FY2025-26
$
FY2026-27
$
FY2027-28
$
FY2028-29
$
Out Year
Progress %
Complete
(Excluding
Closeout)
Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 Q
1 Q
2 Q
3 Q
4 20292024 2025 2026 2027 2028
82 36021 Design Yacht Entrance Harbour Dredging Charles Gerard CSW Legal Compliance 45,000.00 45,000.00 10% 83 29113 Construction Yellow Brick Road Wendy
Wellbrock APM Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 8,499,000.00 8,159,260.23 52,851.21 286,888.56 80% 84 23032 Bid/Award Yellow Brick Road Clean, Green and Beautiful Wendy Wellbrock mack5 Funding Obligation,
Quality of Life 4,999,955.00 83,595.00 3,526,600.00 1,389,760.00 50% Total 354,815,707.85 145,419,817.32 48,831,131.27 31,260,055.38 74,917,268.19 40,743,782.19 7,995,069.06 2,045,657.06 2,045,657.06 1,557,270.34 Last Revised: 4/24/2024 4 of 4918
May 7, 2024
Department
DATE: May 7, 2024
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM:
Mayor Martinez, Councilmember Robinson, and Vice
Mayor Jiménez
Subject:
Resolution in Support of the Implementation of Golden
State Energy, a Not-for-Profit Utility
FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A
PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:
N/A
STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:
Richmond residents and all Californians deserve access
to safe, clean, affordable and reliable energy. The
failures of California’s current utility model and regulatory infrastructure have caused grievous harm via
catastrophic wildfires, smoke, shutoffs, environmental
injustice, climate disruption and escalating rates. An
alternative to the investor owned utility model is needed.
Richmond residents and Californians more broadly would
benefit from ending PG&E’s monopoly control of the
energy transmission and distribution system and
transitioning to an energy system.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
RECEIVE a presentation from the organization Reclaim
Our Power coalition; ADOPT a resolution in support of
the implementation of Golden State Energy; and DIRECT
STAFF to send the attached letter of support to Senator Skinner, Assemblymember Wicks, and Governor
Newsom — Mayor Eduardo Martinez (510-620-6503),
Vice Mayor Claudia Jiménez (510-620-6565), and
Councilmember Doria Robinson (510-620-6568).
AGENDA
REPORT
919
May 7, 2024
DISCUSSION:
“Electrification” is now considered a cornerstone of the transition away from fossil fuels and toward renewable energy sources. In California, the largest sub-national economy in the world, its legislative body and multiple state agencies have put policies in place that encourage decarbonization via massive electrification infrastructure shifts in particular.
Pacific Gas And Electric Company (PG&E) is one of six investor-owned utility (IOU) companies in California and one of the biggest utility companies in the United States. Its coverage area, which includes most of Northern and Central California, covers 70,000 square miles and serves 16 million people across the state.
In California, IOU rates are approved by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), the state’s regulatory agency for these utility companies. In April 2024, with the blessing of the CPUC’s regulations, PG&E implemented massive rate hikes on its customers. This increase comes despite the corporation’s recent, well-documented history of power outages, wildfires, safety violations and financial mismanagement— all of which have posed significant threats to the safety and well-being of Californians.
Given the economic profile of its residents, the City of Richmond must be particularly proactive about energy affordability and accessibility, all of which impact the local economy, housing stability, resident health, and more.
Fundamentally, the investor-owned utility model disincentivizes grid updates and investments in safety measures. Electricity rates are regulated to allow these utility companies to earn a specific rate of return (profit). Under this business model, investments into large projects—particularly new transmission projects—bring in more profit than investing in safety upgrades to existing infrastructure. In other words, there is very little incentive for PG&E and other IOUs to prioritize public benefit and safety when building or upgrading their assets; the safety and reliability of energy service come second to ensuring shareholder profits are maximized.
920
May 7, 2024
There is potential for an alternative model. Following PG&E’s 2019 bankruptcy filing, California passed Senate Bill 350 in 2020. Also known as the Golden State Energy Act, SB 350 represented a critical first step in preparing for the potential failure of PG&E.
SB350 created a framework for establishing Golden State Energy (GSE) to receive PG&E’s assets and authorized GSE to take the basic actions necessary to ensure continuity of critical electrical and gas service in Northern California.
At this juncture, SB350’s design is extremely skeletal, and GSE remains unstaffed and unfunded, creating significant uncertainty in the state’s ability to act quickly in the event of PG&E’s unexpected failure. With the increasing severity and unpredictability of our climate crisis, it is critical that we prepare for that eventuality in a way that prepares GSE to meet Californians’ modern energy needs.
A statewide not-for-profit utility would address energy injustices and prioritize public benefits in the generation, distribution, and transmission grid-level investments. Across the country, municipal utilities, community choice aggregates, rural electric cooperatives, and tribal utilities already serve local electric loads without a profit motive.
Nonprofit utilities, including publicly owned utilities, are able to consider the long-term impacts of an investment and weigh the long-term benefit to customers against short- term costs, without needing to prioritize immediate profits for shareholders.
Significant legal and financial issues remain to be addressed for this transition to occur, from wildfire liabilities to asset price determination. Many sectors of California are directly impacted by PG&E’s failures to prioritize safety, reliability, affordability, health and climate. Transitioning power away from PG&E requires political will, and the movement must center frontline communities in order to meaningfully transform hundred-year-old institutions that are not able to shift with the urgency required for this moment. Cities, counties, schools, labor unions, and community-based organizations must call on California to enable Golden State Energy to become California’s people- serving utility.
In short, further legislative action is needed to flesh out Golden State Energy. Local jurisdictions are in a unique position to apply their influence on state-level decision- makers and advocate for
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
Attachment 1 – Presentation
Attachment 2 – Resolution in support of the Implementation of Golden State Energy
921
Golden State Energy:
A Frontline Vision for Utility
Transformation
05/07/2024
922
Reclaim Our Power: Utility Justice Campaign
Coalition of fire
survivors,
environmental justice
communities, people
with disabilities,
ratepayers, and
workers.
923
ROP Vision:
Communities where all
have the energy and
resources they need to
live and thrive.
Justice is the goal, energy
is the tool.
924
When you think of PG&E, what comes to mind?
925
We need a solution that removes the profit
motive of PG&E, provides pathways to local
resilience and democracy, but does not leave
lower income and rural communities footing
the bill!
926
SB-350 The Golden State Energy Act (2020)
Link to the bill text
● The bill authorized the CPUC to
petition a court to appoint a receiver
to assume possession of PG&E’s
property and to operate its electrical
and gas systems
● Nonprofit public benefit corporation
● Established a 9-member board of
directors, who will be required to
amend Golden State Energy’s bylaws
to transition to 6 board members who
are elected by Golden State Energy’s
customers and 3 board members who
are appointed
927
Golden State Energy as a Provider of Last Resort
● The barriers for cities to grow local resilience and ownership of energy resources are political - roadblocks at the CPUC and legislature, fueled by PG&E lobbying
● Golden State Energy can facilitate a just transition for local cities by guaranteeing reliable provision of electric service to communities across the utility’s territory, and by prioritizing local development ● Cities such as San Francisco and San Jose are looking to “defect” from the grid, leaving lower income and rural communities with the costs of PG&E’s failing grid, unless a not-for-profit alternative for the public benefit can step in to align incentives with community needs.
928
929
Publicly accountable financing
As a not-for-profit utility, Golden State Energy will gain access to lower interest rates and better financing terms through state, federal, and private lending. ● Transparent and publicly accountable financing of infrastructure investments replaces profit-driven incentives of IOU decision making. ● California’s Infrastructure Bank, a green bank, is currently legislated to offer special bond or loan rates to Golden State Energy as serving the public interest
● Municipal bonds could fund distribution system level infrastructure buildout across the state.
930
931
Public Control of the Transmission System
● Reducing incentive for
utilities to overbuild
transmission projects, which
bring in a 7-12% rate of return
for the utility
● Shift incentives from
expensive undergrounding
projects toward cheaper
wildfire mitigation
techniques, local resilience,
and grid maintenance
Transmission
Distribution
932
Mandate for a Just Transition
● Policies for a managed decommisioning of natural gas infrastructure ● Safeguarding existing workers’ jobs and pensions in a transition, and expanding and diversifying the utility workforce
● Addressing the Wildfire Victims Trust Fund - currently tied to PG&E stock price, reparations for fire survivors
● Ensuring equitable decarbonization, local resilience, and affordability 933
Questions for Further Research
● What conditions can incentivize investments by Golden State Energy into distributed energy resources, grid modernization, and upgrades and maintenance of the grid?
● How do we socialize the costs of a non-profit transmission system, and based on what criteria (i.e. region, income, through taxes or rates)?
● How can CCAs relate to distribution grid operators/owners in a way that facilitates local investments?
● What are democratic governance models that will lead to regulatory oversight that is not captured by IOU interests? 934
Request to Council:
ADOPT a resolution in support of the implementation of Golden State Energy, and DIRECT STAFF to send letter to Senator Skinner, Assemblymember Wicks and Governor Newsom
Questions?
[email protected]
935
DOCKETED
Docket Number: 17-MISC-01
Project Title: California Offshore Renewable Energy
TN #: 242750
Document Title: American Clean Power - California Comments on Port funding request from ACP-CA, OWC, CAPA, BNOW
Description: N/A
Filer: System
Organization: American Clean Power - California
Submitter Role: Public
Submission Date: 4/22/2022 11:59:42 AM
Docketed Date: 4/22/2022
936
Comment Received From: American Clean Pow er - California Submitted On: 4/22/2022
Docket Number: 17-MISC-01
Port funding request from ACP -CA, OWC, CAPA, BNOW
Additional submitted attachment is included below .
937
1 April 13, 2022
Honorable Nancy Skinner Honorable Bob Wieckowski
Chair, Senate Budget Committee Chair, Senate Budget Subcommittee #2 California State Capitol Swing Space California State Capitol Swing Space 1020 O Street, Room 8630 1020 O Street, Room 6530
Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814
Honorable Phil Ting Honorable Richard Bloom
Chair, Assembly Budget Committee Chair, Assembly Budget Subcommittee #3 California State Capitol Swing Space California State Capitol Swing Space 1020 O Street, Room 8230 1020 O Street, Room 8130
Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814
SUBJECT: Budget Augmentation of Offshore Wind Energy Deployment Facility Improvement Program Dear Senators Skinner and Wieckowski and Assembly Members Ting and Bloom:
The undersigned coalition, including organizations representing global and state offshore wind developers and supply chain leaders, renewable energy providers, and California’s port authorities all support the responsible development of future offshore wind projects in federal waters off California’s coasts. This coalition is committed to supporting legislation that increases port infrastructure upgrades at California’s ports to help expedite the transition to cleaner energy resources in our state and provide significant environmental and economic benefits. As such, we respectfully request that the Legislature increase funding to improve port infrastructure which will be critical to accommodate future offshore wind deployment in California. Specifically, we respectfully request that the Legislature augment Governor Newsom’s proposed $45 million with an additional $55 million for the 2022-23 budget, thereby allocating a total of $100 million for the reasons outlined below.
Redoubling State’s Climate Change Leadership by Supporting Offshore Wind Infrastructure
Last year the Legislature overwhelmingly supported California advancing the responsible development of offshore wind with the passage of Assembly Bill 525 (Chiu – Chapter 231, Statutes), which requires the state to develop, by June 1, 2022, offshore wind planning goals for 2030 and 2045, in addition to developing a five-part strategic plan for offshore wind developments by June 30, 2023, including an assessment of California’s waterfront facilities to help determine what infrastructure upgrades are needed to meet offshore wind deployment. We appreciate your collective leadership, and working with the Newsom Administration, you signaled the state’s desire through last year’s budget to provide initial planning and infrastructure resources for the North Coast that will help bring this reliable renewable energy resource online.
Examples include a $20 million appropriation in the 2021-22 budget for offshore wind planning, which included $11 million for early upgrades to accommodate offshore wind development in Humboldt County. We applaud the Port of Humboldt and the County’s early efforts as they are much further along
938
2 than the rest of the state in bringing future offshore wind projects to reality to help meet President Biden’s national goal of 30 gigawatt of offshore wind by 2030.
This session, the Legislature could lead again by focusing timely action on developing a multi-ports strategy to fund infrastructure necessary to support this new clean energy industry and to create good living wage jobs for our coastal communities. This is especially timely given the state’s significant 2022- 23 budget surplus, which provides an opportunity to dedicate more funding for needed infrastructure and one-time capital outlay projects in the face of an ongoing surplus that is likely to be in the tens of billions.
Offshore wind is a strong, consistent renewable resource that produces energy at a time of day when energy demand is high, complementing other renewable energy and increasing overall system reliability.
California’s SB 100 Joint Agency Report notes that deploying at least 10 gigawatts (GW) of offshore wind by 2045 will reduce overall portfolio costs by at least $2 billion per year. Creating adequate and timely port infrastructure to support offshore wind development, and ongoing operation and maintenance of floating offshore wind structures, is an essential component of realizing the potential of offshore wind supply chain and job creation.
California does not currently have port capacity necessary to support the construction of multiple commercial-scale offshore wind farms, especially on the Central Coast, where there is available sea space and transmission infrastructure necessary to build at least three GW of offshore wind capacity by 2030. The state must begin planning today to address issues of sea-space, environmental permitting, electric transmission, port improvements, supply chain, and workforce training. Without an urgent and focused effort, lack of port infrastructure could hinder development of this resource and a robust offshore wind supply chain, thereby reducing the economic and environmental benefits of offshore wind deployment. As such, it is critical to initiate a multi-ports strategy, backed with sufficient funding for port infrastructure upgrades, that identifies available port areas that can support offshore wind development.
Increase Infrastructure Port Funding, Expedite Feasibility Studies
The Governor’s proposed budget included an allocation of $45 million for port developments and feasibility studies. We support increasing this amount to a total of $100 million, which will create a fund available for port engineering, design, environmental planning, and construction activities. This fund would also support grants to ports and local governments to secure federal matching funds that are available under the recently enacted Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act.
We support the California Energy Commission (CEC) and the State Lands Commission (SLC) to complete the necessary port feasibility studies and to develop a plan for port infrastructure development in the State needed to support the final assembly and operation and maintenance of offshore wind projects.
To complete the work required under AB 525, and to provide state matching grants for port upgrades and, if necessary, new port construction in California, those agencies will need at least $5 million to complete the ports engineering and feasibility studies required under AB 525, and to develop a port development plan that:
1. Starts from a baseline of publicly available information, including existing port assessments and plans prepared to date by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the Schatz Energy Research Center, and Humboldt County;
2. Defines the port infrastructure requirements needed to assemble, operate, and maintain floating offshore wind structures on the Central Coast capable of producing more than three GW of electricity by 2030;
939
3 3. Analyzes available port infrastructure in California considering those needs and ranks existing ports based on their suitability to support floating offshore wind development at scale and in a timeframe consistent with the goal of at least 3 GW of installed capacity by 2030;
4. Considers alternative locations, especially on the Central Coast, for new or expanded port infrastructure suitable to assemble, operate and maintain floating offshore wind structures capable of producing more than three GW of electricity by 2030 (e.g., in the Morro Bay Wind Energy Area (WEA); and
5. Recommends a proposed solution, i.e., identifies one or more new or existing port facilities in Central or Southern California capable of supporting the timely development of at least three GW of floating offshore wind in the Morro Bay WEA by 2030 (and is forward looking enough to accommodate the state’s ultimate plan for full offshore wind build out beyond 2030).
The analysis and recommendations to the Legislature should consider all relevant factors, including costs and feasibility, relative economic, air quality, and other benefits to the State and affected communities, as well as distance to and from the Morro Bay WEA and associated tow duration, fuel consumption, air emissions, and other costs that will impact the levelized cost of energy produced from the windfarm installations off the coast of Morro Bay.
Once those studies and port development/redevelopment plans are complete, the State will need up to $95 million of available funds to support the design engineering studies, environmental review and permitting of new or expanded port infrastructure, and construction activities. That amount will support direct grants in addition to matching grants to leverage available federal funding for port redevelopment and port construction.
The Benefits
• Developing a comprehensive plan for port infrastructure development in California, as required by AB 525, will enable the timely development of at least 3 GW of offshore wind on the Central Coast by 2030.
• Port infrastructure development will create thousands of family wage job opportunities for Californians and enable the State to meet its clean energy and offshore wind goals.
Finally, we encourage the CEC, in its current effort to establish offshore wind goals, to take a bold approach and consider setting goals that would establish California as a leader in offshore wind. We support planning to reach 3 GW of offshore wind by 2030, and to create a steady supply chain and jobs by maintaining consistent growth each year until 2045. Therefore, we encourage the CEC to consider establishing goals 18 GW by 2045 and up to 20 GW by 2050.
Sincerely,
Varner Seaman Adam Stern
American Clean Power-CA Offshore Wind California
Nancy Kirshner-Rodriguez Martha Miller
Business Network for Offshore Wind California Association of Port Authorities
940
4 cc: Governor Gavin Newsom
Keely Bosler, Director of Department of Finance
Ana Matosantos, Cabinet Secretary, Governor’s Office
Karen Douglas, Senior Energy Advisor, Governor’s Office Commissioner David Hochschild, Chair of CEC
Commissioner Kourtney Vaccaro, CEC
Members of the Senate Budget Subcommittee #2 (Resources and Energy) Members of the Assembly Budget Subcommittee #3 (Climate Crisis, Resources, and Energy) Senator Toni Atkins, Senate President pro Tempore
Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon
Senate Republican Leader Scott Wilk
Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher
Kip Lipper, Chief Energy Advisor for Senate pro Tempore Toni Atkins Chase Hopkins, Energy Advisor for Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon James Hacker, Consultant for Senate Budget Subcommittee #2 Emilye Reeb, Senate Republican Budget Consultant
Shy Forbes, Consultant for Assembly Budget Subcommittee #3 Gregory Melkonian, Assembly Republican Policy and Budget Consultant
941
May 7, 2024
Police Department
DATE: May 7, 2024
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM:
Bisa French, Chief of Police
John Lopez, Captain
Subject:
AB 481 “Military Equipment Use” Annual Report
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no direct financial impact related to this report.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:
-First introduced on October 4, 2022
-Passed and adopted by Council on October 18, 2022
STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:
The Military Equipment policy and ordinance is subject to annual City Council review to determine whether, based
on an annual military equipment use report, the
standards set forth in the approving ordinance have been met.
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
ADOPT a resolution (1) accepting the 2023 Annual
Military Equipment Report, (2) determining that the Police Department’s use of military equipment in 2023 complied with the Department’s Military Equipment Policy No. 707 and state law, and (3) determining that Policy 707 will be continued without change - Police Department (Bisa
French 510-621-1802).
BACKGROUND:
Assembly Bill 481 was adopted by the California Legislature and approved by Governor Gavin Newsom in September 2021. It went into effect on January 1, 2022. AB 481 is designed to increase community awareness and oversight over the possession and use AGENDA
REPORT
942
May 7, 2024
by local police departments of certain types of equipment that AB 481 labels as “military equipment”. It requires the City Council to provide both authorization and oversight of the equipment used. The law, codified in California Government Code sections 7070 through 7075, requires law enforcement agencies to produce a military equipment use policy that identifies and describes: each type of military equipment; its authorized use; fiscal impact; rules/laws that govern use of such equipment; training required; and mechanisms to ensure compliance with the policy. (See Gov. Code section 7070(d)).
Per Government code 7072(a), the Police Department must submit to the City Council an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the council within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The annual report must also be made available to the public on the Police Department’s website and include a summary of the following:
1. How the military equipment was used and for the purpose of its use.
2. A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment.
3. The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response.
4. The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report.
5. The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment.
6. If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.
DISCUSSION:
Staff recommends that the City Council review the 2023 Military Equipment Annual Report and renew the authorizing ordinance “Military Equipment Use Policy” to ensure that the Richmond Police Department continue to have access to each of its existing pieces of qualifying equipment, and to affirm the corresponding policies and procedures applicable to maintenance and use of the equipment.
On April 11, 2022, the Police Department launched a new web page (viewable at https://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/4248/Assembly-Bill-AB-481---Military-Equipmen ) dedicated to AB 481. This web page includes our upcoming community engagement meetings, definitions, updated proposed policy, and an inventory report detailing the Police Department’s current equipment.
AB 481 defines the term “military equipment” to include many pieces of equipment that are designed exclusively for, and commonly used by, local law enforcement agencies 943
May 7, 2024
throughout the United States. While the Richmond Police Department possesses some equipment as defined by AB 481, the types of equipment possessed by the Richmond Police Department have been possessed for years (in some cases decades) and are all designed specifically for law enforcement (not military) applications.
Military Equipment is defined by Government Code section 7070(c)(1-15) as the following:
1. Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles.
2. Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. (Not applicable to RPD)
3. High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. (Not applicable to RPD)
4. Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. (Not applicable to RPD)
5. Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units.
6. Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. (Not applicable to RPD)
7. Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
8. Firearms and ammunition of.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition. (Not applicable to RPD)
9. Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.
10. Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. (Not applicable to RPD)
11. Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools.
12. Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
13. TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs). (Not applicable to RPD)
14. Kinetic energy weapons and munitions (e.g., 40MM launcher, beanbag shotgun, foam-tipped projectiles).
15. Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
For each type of qualifying equipment possessed by the Richmond Police Department, the possession and use of that equipment was already governed by applicable 944
May 7, 2024
Department policy, various statutes, and state and federal case law before the state enacted AB 481.
Training:
All personnel of the Richmond Police Department are trained in compliance with California Peace Officer Standards & Training (POST) requirements before using any of the equipment that falls within the categories listed. Some of the equipment is used exclusively by members of the specially trained RPD Special Response Team (which includes the Special Weapons & Tactics team, Mobile Field Force, Aerial Scout Team, and the Crisis Negotiation Team), who receive additional specialized training. In addition, much of the qualifying equipment possessed by the Richmond Police Department is specifically designed for the safe resolution of critical incidents, as opposed to everyday routine patrol deployment.
Military Equipment Use Policy:
The approved policy outlines all qualifying equipment possessed by the Department under the Military Equipment Inventory of the policy.
To safeguard the public’s welfare and safety, the qualified equipment already possessed by the Richmond Police department is considered essential and necessary because there is no reasonable alternative resources that can achieve the same objective. Examples include but are not limited to:
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) & Robot – A UAS (commonly referred to as a drone) is an unmanned aircraft of any type that is capable of sustaining directed flight (remote-control), and designed for gathering information through imaging, and/or recording. The UASs are deployed to gather information without jeopardizing the safety of officers, bystanders, and criminal suspects. The robot is a small-unmanned remote- controlled tracked robot that is capable of gathering information through imaging, and/or recording.
Mobile Command Center - The Mobile Command Center is a 2012 EVI Spartan 40- foot non-armored vehicle used as an Incident Command Post for preplanned events or unplanned critical incidents. It is a vital component to the police mission when major emergencies, natural disasters or special events in the community trigger the mobilization and coordination of significant resources in the field. Its primary use is to facilitate the management and coordination of personnel, communications, and equipment resources at complex incidents.
Breaching Shotgun & Projectiles – The breaching shotgun is a Remington 870 Police Magnum shotgun modified to breach (open) secured doorframes and disable deadbolt- locking devices. The associated projectiles (shotgun breaching rounds) are rounds specifically made to fragment (break up) on impact. The use of a breaching shotgun and breaching projectiles are an effective option for specifically trained units within the Richmond Police Department.
945
May 7, 2024
Patrol Rifles & Ammunition – Rifles are a shoulder fired long gun that fires a rifle caliber cartridge (bullet projectile). The Department approved AR-15 style platform weapon system is designed to fire a .223/5.56 caliber projectile bullet. In order to effectively and accurately address the increasing level of firepower and body armor utilized by criminal suspects, the Richmond Police Department provide patrol rifles available to qualified patrol officers as an additional and immediate tactical resource.
Examples of some general guidelines for deploying the Patrol Rifle include:
a) Situations where the officer reasonably anticipates an armed encounter b) When an officer is faced with a situation that may require the delivery of accurate and effective fire at long range
c) Situations where an officer reasonably expects the need to meet or exceed a suspect’s firepower
d) When an officer reasonably believes that there may be a need to deliver fire on a barricaded suspect or a suspect with a hostage
e) When an officer reasonably believes that a suspect may be wearing body armor f) When authorized or requested by a supervisor
g) When needed to euthanize an animal
Diversion Devices (Flashbangs) – Diversion Devices (flashbangs) are a non-lethal noise/flash device that emits an extremely loud sound and bright light as a distraction. It is ideal for distracting dangerous suspects during assaults, hostage rescue, room entry or other high-risk arrest situations. To produce atmospheric over-pressure and brilliant white light and, as a result, can cause short-term physiological/psychological sensory deprivation to give officers a tactical advantage.
Chemical Agents - Chemical agents are canisters or projectile rounds containing chemical agents that are released when deployed by specially trained officers.
Chemical agents are to be used exclusively by SRT team members. Generally, during high-risk tactical incidents chemical agents can be used to dislodge a suspect from a stronghold location with the least possible danger to citizens, police, and the suspect.
Chemical agents can also be used to prevent an armed suspect from accurately firing at citizens and/or officers. They can also be used in limited instances during civil unrest when objectively reasonable to defend against a threat to life or serious bodily injury to any individual, including the officer, or to bring an objectively dangerous and unlawful situation safely and effectively under control.
Less Lethal Impact Devices & Kinetic Energy Projectiles – Less lethal devices are tools specifically used to launch impact rounds. Kinetic energy projectiles, when used properly, are less likely to result in death or serious physical injury and can be used in an attempt to de-escalate a potentially deadly situation. Only department-approved kinetic energy munitions shall be carried and deployed. Approved munitions may be used to compel an individual to cease his/her actions when such munitions present a reasonable option. The safety of hostages, innocent persons and officers takes priority 946
May 7, 2024
over the safety of subjects engaged in criminal or suicidal behavior. Circumstances appropriate for deployment include, but are not limited to, situations in which:
a) The suspect is armed with a weapon and the tactical circumstances allow for the safe application of approved munitions,
b) The suspect has made credible threats to harm him/herself or others, c) The suspect is engaged in riotous behavior or is throwing rocks, bottles, or other dangerous projectiles at people and/or officers,
d) There is probable cause to believe that the suspect has already committed a crime of violence and is refusing to comply with lawful orders.
Stakeholder Engagement
The Richmond Police Department held the following Community Engagement meetings in compliance with AB 481:
1. January 25, 2023: Zoom meeting – Members of the Richmond Police Department held a community engagement meeting via Zoom. The Richmond Police Department provided the 2023 AB 481 Military Equipment Annual Report and an overview of the department’s military equipment inventory. The community engagement meeting was recorded and uploaded on the COR’s YouTube page.
2. The Richmond Police Department also re-introduced a new email for comments, concerns, or questions regarding our equipment policy
([email protected]).
3. February 5, 2024: Zoom meeting – Members of the Richmond Police Department held a community engagement meeting via zoom. A presentation was provided regarding the 2023 Annual Military Equipment Annual Report to community members and online attendees. Questions, concerns, and feedback were also collected.
4. March 18, 2024: Zoom meeting – Members of the Richmond Police Department held a community engagement meeting via zoom. A presentation was provided regarding the 2023 Annual Military Equipment Annual Report to community members and online attendees. Questions, concerns, and feedback were also collected.
5. The following supporting documents are easily accessible on the Richmond Police Department’s Military Equipment website:
https://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/4248/Assembly-Bill-AB-481---Military-Equipmen
a) 2023 Annual Report
b) RPD Military Equipment Policy – PM section 707
947
May 7, 2024
c) City Council Ordinance No. 12-22 N.S
d) RPD’s Military Equipment Inventory
e) First Amendment Assembly Policy
f) Monthly Military Equipment Use Statistics for 2024
Staff’s Recommendation
RPD staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution (1) accepting the 2023 Annual Military Equipment Report, (2) determining that the Police Department’s use of military equipment in 2023 complied with the Department’s Military Equipment Policy No. 707 and state law, and (3) determining that Policy 707 will be continued without change.
DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:
Attachment 1 – RPD Military Equipment Annual Report
Attachment 2 – RPD Policy 707
Attachment 3 – Resolution
Attachment 4 – PowerPoint Presentation
948
Annual Military
Equipment Report
Jan. 1, 2023 – Dec. 31, 2023
Richmond Police Department
949
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
2 CONTENTS
Mission Statement __________________________ 3
Equipment Overview ________________________ 4
Introduction _______________________________ 5
Executive Summary _________________________ 6
Definitions ________________________________ 8
Equipment Inventory by Type ________________ 10
Military Equipment Use Summary _____________ 13
Summary of Complaints / Concerns ___________ 15
Fiscal Impact _____________________________ 16
Conclusion _______________________________ 17
950
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
3 MISSION STATEMENT
The Mission of the Richmond Police Department is to prevent crime and maintain order.
We work in partnership with our diverse community to help solve neighborhood problems, address root causes of crime and improve the quality of life in Richmond.
We strive to perform in a manner that promotes public trust, confidence and a sense of safety and security.
951
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
4 EQUIPMENT OVERVIEW
The Richmond Police Department does not possess any tactical equipment that it has obtained from the military, nor does it possess any equipment that was designed for military use. RPD does not participate in the Law Enforcement Support Officer (LESO) 10-33 program. The Department does not currently receive or utilize surplus military equipment from the Federal government. It is the policy of the Richmond Police Department to acquire and use equipment designed to enhance municipal law enforcement’s ability to ensure public safety and welfare.
Items deemed to be “military equipment” by Government Code § 7070 are used as a component of overall best practices for law enforcement agencies throughout the country. These tools have been tested in the field and are used by law enforcement agencies to enhance public safety, and officer safety. The term "military equipment," as used in Government Code § 7070, in fact does not necessarily indicate equipment that has been used by the military.
It is the policy of the Richmond Police Department to acquire and use equipment designed to enhance law enforcement's ability to ensure public safety and welfare. It is the policy of RPD that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code § 7071 and Richmond Police Policy Manual 707 with respect to military equipment use. California Government Code § 7070 provides a list of equipment types that are considered to be "military equipment" for purposes of this report, and RPD Military Equipment Use Pol icy includes information for any such equipment types that are used by RPD.
The equipment listed in this report are essential tools that may be required on occasion to prevent, avoid, or stop imminent or threatened violent acts towards our community.
The mere possession of this equipment does not warrant its use in every circumstance. However, having this equipment available increases the Department’s ability to mitigate violent threats towards the public.
There is significant interest in ensuring that the Richmond Police Department continues to have access to equipment that will provide its officers as many options as possible to safeguard lives, ensure safety, and protect civil liberties. The use of the tools identified below are vital to R PD’s mission an d will continue to be strictly regulated through internal processes and oversight. 952
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
5 INTRODUCTION
The Richmond Police Department maintains and deploys a wide variety of military equipment to assist in safely achieving the furtherance of its mission statement to “prevent crime and maintain order. We work in partnership with our diverse community to help solve neighborhood problems, address root causes of crime and improve the quality of life in Richmond. We strive to perform in a manner that promotes public trust, confidence and a sense of safety and security.” While the inventory of military equipment is varied, the mere possession of the equipment does not warrant its use for every incident.
The Richmond Police Department recognizes that critical incidents are unpredictable and can be very dynamic in nature. A variety of military equipment options can greatly assist incident commanders, officers, and specific units in bringing those incidents to a swift resolution in a safe manner.
The use of military equipment is restricted for use only in certain instances and in some cases only by certain units. While the military equipment procedure is wide-ranging, it is not all inclusive. There may be instances wherein unpredictable critical incidents demand the need for incident commanders to authorize military equipment to be used in a manner not outlined within procedure. In scrutinizing those particular in stances, the judgment of the incident commander influenced by the totality of the circumstances, public safety, officer safety, civil rights, and information available at the time will be used.
It is incumbent upon incident commanders, supervisors, indivi dual officers, and specific units to recognize the particular circumstances wherein military equipment should be employed to enhance the safety of the public and officers, and to bring critical incident to a safe resolution.
This annual report outlines a summary of military equipment usage guidelines, inventory, fiscal impact, complaints, and reported concerns from Jan. 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023. 953
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
On September 30, 2021, the Governor of the State of California approved AB -481 requ iring law enforcement agencies to obtain approval of the applicable governing body (Mayor and City Council), by adoption of a military equipment use policy. The Department is required to seek City Council approval of their military equipment use procedure by ordinance at a regular open meeting prior to taking certain actions relating to the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment, as defined.
The bill allows the governing body to approve the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment within its jurisdiction only if it determines that the military equipment meets specified standards. The ordinance is subject to annual City Council review to determine whether, based on an annual military equipment report, the standards set forth in the approving ordinance have been met. The City Council may renew the authorizing ordinance, disapprove authorization for particular military equipment where standards have not been met, or require modifications to the military equipment use procedure to address any non-compliance with standards.
Finally, the bill requires publication of the military equipment use procedure and the annual military equipment report on the Department’s website. The military equipment use procedure must be posted on the website at least 30 days prior to the Council meeting.
AB-481, Section 7072 states the following:
(a) A law enforcement agency that receives approval for a military equipment use policy pursuant to Section 7071 shall submit to the governing body an annual military equipment report for each type of military equipment approved by the governing body within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The law enforcement agency shall also make each annual military equipment report required by this section publicly available on its internet website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The annual military equipment report shall, at a minimum, include the following information for the immediately preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment:
(1) A summary of how the military equipment was used and the purpose of its use.
(2) A summary of any complaints or concerns received concerning the military equipment.
(3) The results of any internal audits, any information about violations of the military equipment use policy, and any actions taken in response.
(4) The total annual cost for each type of military equipment, including acquisition, personnel, training, transportation, maintenance, storage, upgrade, and other ongoing costs, and from what source funds will be provided for the military equipment in the calendar year following submission of the annual military equipment report.
954
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
7 (5) The quantity possessed for each type of military equipment.
(6) If the law enforcement agency intends to acquire additional military equipment in the next year, the quantity sought for each type of military equipment.
(7) Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing an annual military equipment report pursuant to this section, the law enforcement agency shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the general public may discuss and ask questions regarding the annual military equipment report and the law enforcement agency’s funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.
In addition to maintaining the highest levels of public safety, the Richmond Police Department is committed to transparency, public trust, community partnerships, and compliance with the law.
955
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
8 DEFINITIONS
Pursuant to AB-481, the following definitions are applicable only to the Department’s current military equipment inventory and potential future military equipment acquisitions for operational needs. (For a more detailed list, refer to Government Code section 7070, for “military equipment” as defined within the Assembly Bill.)
“Governing body” means the Richmond City Council and Mayor. “Military equipment” means the following:
1. (UAS) Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. This definition applies to the Department’s inventory of small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) and SWAT robots.
2. Mine-resistant ambush -protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. (Not applicable to the Richmond Police Department)
3. High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), 2 ½, ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have breaching or entry apparatus attached. (Not applicable to the Richmond Police Department)
4. Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their oc cupants (Not applicable to the Richmond Police Department)
5. (Mobile Command Center) Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. (Mobile Command Vehicle)
6. Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind . (Not applicable to the Richmond Police Department)
7. (Breaching Shotguns) Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
8. Firearms and ammunition of .50 caliber or greater, excluding standard -issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition. (Not applicable to the Richmond Police Department)
9. (Patrol Rifles) Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than .50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code 30510 and Penal Code 30515, with exception of standard-issue firearms.
10. Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. (Not applicable to the Richmond Police Department)
11. (Flash-bangs) Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools.
12. (Chemical Agents) Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service- issued handheld pepper spray.
13. Taser Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long range acoustic devices also known as LRADs. (Not applicable to the Richmond Police Department)
14. Kinetic energy weapons and munitions to include 40mm launcher, bean bag shotgun, 956
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
9 foam-tipped projectiles.
15. Any other equipment as determined by a governing body (Richmond City Council) or a state agency to require additional oversight. (Not applicable to the Richmond Police Department)
“Military Equipment Use Policy” refers to the Richmond Police Department’s Military Equipment Use Policy (PM 707) and means a publicly released, written document governing the use of military equipment by the Department that addresses, at a minimum, all of the following:
1. A description of each type of military equipment, the quantity sought, its capabilities, expected lifespan, and product descriptions from the manufacturer of the military equipment.
2. The purposes and authorized uses for which the Department proposes to use each type of military equipment.
3. The fiscal impact of each type of military equipment, including the initial costs of obtaining the equipment and estimated annual costs of maintaining the equipment.
4. The legal and procedural rules that govern each authorized use.
5. The training, including any course required by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, that must be completed before any sworn member is allowed to use each specific type of military equipment to ensure the full protection of the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties and full adherence to the military equipment use policy.
6. The mechanisms to ensure compliance with the military equipment use policy, including which independent persons or entities have oversight authority, and, if applicable, what legally enforceable sanctions are put in place for violations of the policy.
7. The procedures by which members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of military equipment, and how the Department will ensure that each complaint, concern, or question receives a response in a timely manner.
957
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
10 EQUIPMENT INVENTORY BY TYPE
Note: The inventory of certain items of consumable military equipment (e.g. ammunition, diversionary devices, chemical agents, etc.) frequently fluctuates throughout the year due to operational usage, training, operational wear, or manufacturer recommended replacement guidelines. While the Richmond Police Department strives to provide accuracy in its inventory reporting, this report reflects approximations of certain consumable items of military equipment. Quantities listed are ending quantities from the reporting period of January 1, 2023 through December 31, 2023.
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS / Drones)
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
DJI Inspire 1
DJI Matrice 210 1
DJI Mini 2 2
DJI Mavic Enterprise DUAL 2
DJI Mavic 2 Enterprise Advanced 1
DJI Mavic Pro M1P 1
Tactical Robot
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
Recon Robotics 1
Mobile Command Center (MCC)
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
2013 EVI Spartan Mobile Command Center 1
Breaching Shotguns
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
Remington 870 Police Magnum Shotgun 2
958
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
11 Shotgun Breaching Munitions
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
TESAR-2 / Model FE183 100 Rounds
TESAR – 1 / Model FE182 100 Rounds
Rifles
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
COLT M4 Carbine .223 50
COLT M16 A2E .223 (SWAT Only) 13
COLT Commando .223 (SWAT Only) 2
DPMS M-160 (SWAT Only) 5
COLT M16 A2 (SWAT Only) 2
COLT AR-15 Match Target Competition Rifle 8
H&K MP5 (SWAT / Decommissioned) 17
The Richmond SWAT Team maintains in its inventory special weapons for the purpose of providing tactical flexibility and effectively operating in a variety of situations. SWAT Tea m members shall maintain an acceptable level of proficiency with assigned weapons employed by the team. The SWAT Team will provide training and testing for all team members to ensure familiarity and proficiency with such weapon systems.
Rifle Ammunition
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
Gold Dot Soft Point 62 grain .223 10,000 Rounds
Federal Tactical Tru 168 grain .308 200 Rounds
Federal Tactical Bonded Tip 168 grain .308 200 Rounds
Diversionary Devices (Flash Bangs)
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
Defense Technology Model #8933 120
Chemical Agents and Smoke Canisters
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
Defense Tech SPEDE-HEAT – Pyro Burning CS Gas #1072 10 Canisters 959
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
12 Defense Tech HAN-BALL – Pyro Burning CS Gas #1092 20 Canisters Defense Tech Flameless Tri-Chamber – Pyro Internal CS Gas #1032 10 Canisters CTS Indoor 5230 B – Pyro Indoor Safe CS Gas #5230B 25 Canisters Defense Tech Aerosol Vapor – Non-Pyro OC Gas #1056 25 Canister Defense Tech Maximum Smoke – Pyro High Volume #1083 10 Canisters CTS 40mm Liquid Ferret Rounds – Non-Pyro CS gas Launchable Munition #4330 100 Rounds Defense Tech 40mm Direct Impact OC – Direct Impact OC Gas #6320 100 Rounds Pepperball Live Projectiles .2% PAVA 375 Rounds
40mm Launchers and Munitions
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
Penn Arms 40mm, 6-cylnder Pump Multi-Launcher 3
Penn Arms 40mm, single-shot launcher 7
Defense Tech 40mm Exact Impact Sponge Round #6325 60
Defense Tech 40mm Exact Impact (Marking) #6325-A 50
Federal Laboratories 37mm (Decommissioned) 2
Less Lethal Shotguns and Rounds
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
Remington Model 870, 12-guage Shotgun 17
Defense Tech 12-guage Bean Bag Drag Stabilized 200 Rounds CTS 12-guage Bean Bag Super-sock 250 Rounds
Chemical Shotgun
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
Remington Model 870, 12-guage Shotgun 2
Less Lethal Launcher
Equipment Name and Model Quantity
FN 303 4
960
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
13 MILITARY EQUIPMENT USE SUMMARY
This section outlines the military equipment Usage for January 1, 2023 – December 31, 2023 by the Richmond Police Department. Certain items of military equipment, particularly consumables (ammunition, diversionary devices, chemical agents, etc.) are used throughout the year on a regular basis for training in order to maintain proficiency. Training usage is NOT captured in this section. This section ONLY provides data for the OPERATIONAL USE of military equipment listed within this annual report. The mere possession of the equipment does not warrant its use for every incident.
The following is the data for military equipment usage by category for this reporting period:
1. UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS / DRONES)
Unmanned Aerial Systems were utilized a total of 111 times during this reporting period.
Authorized usages:
Collect aerial photographic and video evidence in support of an investigation (e.g., crime scene documentation of shootings, homicides, officer-involved shootings). Support SWAT and patrol during high -risk, tactical, or other public safety life -preservation missions (e.g., interior visual assessments of structures or outdoor areas to gain intelligence prior to officers entering a dwelling or contacting a potentially armed, or resistive subject that may be hiding).
Conduct overwatch and intelligence gathering for investigative, specialty units, and SRT during critical incidents and investigations.
Assisting patrol with establishing overwatch during perimeter searches. Conduct aerial searches for at-risk and missing persons. Special events (e.g. outreach event)
2. TACTICAL ROBOT
The Tactical Robot was deployed/utilized 0 times during this reporting period.
3. ARMORED PERSONNEL CARRIER (RESCUE VEHICLE)
From January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023, the Richmond Police Department utilized East Bay Regional’s BATT 9 times.
Authorized Usages:
Support SWAT during critical incidents and pre -planned operations by providing greater safety to community members and officers.
Higher degree of ballistic protection during high-risk operations The use of a rescue vehicle is extremely vital to ensure the communities safety and ensure mission success.
4. MOBILE COMMAND CENTER
The Mobile Command Center (MCC) was used a total of 8 times during this reporting period.
Authorized usages:
Serves as a command post for critical incidents during complex events 961
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
14 Special Events (RPD Connect, Cinco De Mayo, Juneteenth) DUI Checkpoint command post
5. BREACHING SHOTGUN
The Breaching shotguns (Remington 870) were utilized 2 times in 2023.
Authorized usages:
SWAT Team operations for High Risk warrant services
6. LESS LETHAL SHOTGUNS AND MUNITIONS
Less Lethal Beanbag shotguns (Remington 870) was used 1 time during this reporting period.
Authorized usages:
Confront armed person and the tactical circumstances allow for the safe application of approved munitions.
7. DIVERSIONARY DEVICES
Diversionary Devices (flashbangs) were utilized 38 times during this reporting period.
Authorized usages:
To facilitate high -risk entries during warrant services, enabling arrest and reducing the risk of injury by disorientation of potentially dangerous suspects and/or animals. Used as a distraction device during all incidents
8. RIFLES AND AMMUNITION
Rifles were utilized 2 times during this reporting period.
Authorized usages:
There is an objectively reasonable anticipation of an armed encounter. Used in accordance with California Penal Code § 835 and RPD PM 300.3.2
9. CHEMICAL AGENTS AND SMOKE CANISTERS
Chemical Agents and Smoke Canisters were used 0 times during this reporting period.
10. 40mm LAUNCHERS AND MUNITIONS
40mm Launchers were used by the Richmond Police Department 4 times during this period. Impact rounds (9)
OC rounds (4)
CS rounds (0)
Authorized usages:
Encountering an armed person with a weapon and the tactical circumstances allow for the safe application
There is probable cause to believe that the person has already committed a crime of violence and is refusing to comply with lawful orders.
11. PEPPERBALL LAUNCHERS AND PROJECTILES
Pepper-ball launchers and projectiles were used 0 times during this reporting period.
962
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
15 SUMMARY OF COMPLAINTS / CONCERNS
The Richmond Police Department is committed to responding to complaints, concerns and/or questions received in a timely manner. During this reporting period, there were 0 formal complaints.
The Richmond Police Department did not have any policy violations with the deployment or use of military equipment.
Pursuant to California Government Code §7070(d)(7), members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of military equipment in this policy by any of the following means:
1. Via email to: [email protected]
2. Via phone call to: 510-620-6675
3. Via mail sent to: Richmond Police Department, 1701 Regatta Blvd, Richmond, CA, 94801
Officer-Involved Shootings (OIS) and Discharge of Military Equipment Firearm:
There was 1 OIS incident during this reporting period that involved the use of military equipment:
June 28, 2023: A search warrant was authorized and served at 1293 Sanderling Island in Richmond by members of the Richmond Tactical Response Team (TRT). The search warrant was the culmination of several firearm brandishing reports taken by patrol, and hours of surveillance by Richmond Police Intelligence officers. The person suspected of brandishing a firearm was located and arrested for the related firearm warrant charges. On June 28th, a search warrant was authorized for the search of 1293 Sanderling Island. A clear knock and notice was given at the front door by TRT members and again inside the residence after entry was made.
During the service, a male subject was contacted inside in an upstairs bedroom. The subject pointed a loaded AR-15 rifle at TRT members. Two officers immediately discharged their duty rifles striking the male subject. The subject was pronounced deceased at the scene.
Subsequent search of the residence yields:
53 firearms (20 Rifles, 23 Pistols, 8 Revolvers, 2 Shotguns) Live hand-grenade
Over a thousand rounds of ammunition
Firearm manufacturing equipment
963
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
16 FISCAL IMPACT
The Richmond Police Department is budgeted for 145 sworn officers and 65 professional staff members. The operating budget for the police department for the FY2022-23 was $73,102,610. The chart below reflects the Richmond Police Department’s cost for Military Equipment during this reporting period.
Equipment Quantity Additional
Acquisitions
Annual Maintenance /
Replacement Cost Total Cost
1. UAS 8 $ 3,602 $ 2,000 $ 5,602
2. Mobile Command Center 1 $ - $ 196 $ 196
3. Tactical Robot 1 $ - $ - $ -
4. Breaching Shotguns 2 $ - $ 100 $ 100
5. Breaching Rounds 300 $ 2,000 $ 2,000
6. Rifles 80 $ - $ 100 $ 100
7. Rifle Ammunition 10,000 $ 29,547 $ 30,000 $ 59,547
8. Diversion Devices 200 $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000
9. Chemical Agents $ - $ 2,000 $ 2,000
10. Beanbag Shotgun 17 $ - $ 100 $ 100
11. Direct Impact munitions 700 $ - $ 1,500 $ 1,500
12. Direct Impact Launchers 13 $ - $ 500 $ 500
The safe and proficient use of the equipment outlined by AB 481 requires countless hours of initial and on-going training as well as required certifications. Most training for department personnel is conducted internally by department personnel to ensure adherence to law and policy. There are times when department personnel are sent to external training courses to enhance and supplement internal trainings and to obtain train the trainer certifications.
Consumable and non-consumable equipment are used during training to ensure proficiency and competency during real-life emergencies. Funding sources for all internal and external training are reflected in the Richmond Police Department’s operations budget. https://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/183/Budget-Documents
964
Richmond Police Department
Annual Military Equipment Use Report
Jan.1, 2023 – December 31, 2023
17 CONCLUSION
This Military Equipment Report reaffirms the Richmond Police Department’s commitment to providing transparency and information to our communities and elected officials in addition to ensuring compliance with the law. The equipment, resources, and training outlined in this report allow Richmond Police Officers to better protect our communities, enhance the safety of the public and officers, and bring critical incidents to a safe resolution.
Public safety is and always has remained a shared responsibility. The strength of our Department is structured with the willingness of our communities to work in partnership with our officers to address crime in their neighborhoods. This shared partnership with the community and continued support has helped the COR be an example of community policing to not only the Bay Area, but to the entire Nation.
Since our founding in August of 1905, the Richmond Police Department has stood watch and protected our community with Pride & Purpose. Every day, first responders put their own lives on the line to ensure the community’s safety. It is vital that the City of Richmond ensures that our First Responders have the necessary tools, equipment, and training to protect the community they have sworn to serve.
Understanding law enforcement is a partnership between the police and community, we will continue to serve and do all we can to guard against harmful actions of a few individuals. The Richmond Police Department is proud to work in partnership with our diverse community to help solve problems, address root causes of crime and improve the quality of life in Richmond.
For more information on RPD Military Equipment visit:
https://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/4248/Assembly-Bill-AB-481---Military-Equipment
965
Policy
707
Richmond Police Department
Richmond PD CA Policy Manual
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/10/18, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Richmond Police Department ***DRAFT*** Military Equipment Use Policy - 1 Military Equipment Use Policy
707.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE
This policy is provided to fulfill the obligations set forth in Assembly Bill No. 481 and establish guidelines for the funding, acquisition, use, and reporting requirements of "military equipment" as the term is defined in Government Code §7070. These obligations include but are not limited to seeking approval on specific items deemed by statute to be military equipment and requirements related to compliance, annual reporting, and complaints regarding these items. 707.1.1 DEFINITIONS
Definitions related to this policy include (Government Code § 7070):
Governing Body – The Richmond City Council.
Military Equipment – Shall have the same meaning as defined by California Government Code §7070, which includes but is not limited to the following:
• Unmanned, remotely piloted, powered aerial or ground vehicles. • Mine-resistant ambush-protected (MRAP) vehicles or armored personnel carriers. • High mobility multipurpose wheeled vehicles (HMMWV), two-and-one-half-ton trucks, five-ton trucks, or wheeled vehicles that have a breaching or entry apparatus attached. • Tracked armored vehicles that provide ballistic protection to their occupants. • Command and control vehicles that are either built or modified to facilitate the operational control and direction of public safety units. • Weaponized aircraft, vessels, or vehicles of any kind. • Battering rams, slugs, and breaching apparatuses that are explosive in nature. This does not include a handheld, one-person ram.
• Firearms and ammunition of_.50 caliber or greater, excluding standard-issue shotguns and standard-issue shotgun ammunition.
• Specialized firearms and ammunition of less than_.50 caliber, including firearms and accessories identified as assault weapons in Penal Code § 30510 and Penal Code § 30515, with the exception of standard-issue firearms.
• Any firearm or firearm accessory that is designed to launch explosive projectiles. • Noise-flash diversionary devices and explosive breaching tools. • Munitions containing tear gas or OC, excluding standard, service-issued handheld pepper spray.
• TASER® Shockwave, microwave weapons, water cannons, and long-range acoustic devices (LRADs).
• Kinetic energy weapons and munitions (e.g., 40MM launcher, bean bag shotgun, foam-tipped projectiles).
966
Richmond Police Department
Richmond PD CA Policy Manual
Military Equipment Use Policy
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/10/18, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Richmond Police Department ***DRAFT*** Military Equipment Use Policy - 2 • Any other equipment as determined by a governing body or a state agency to require additional oversight.
707.2 POLICY
It is the policy of the Richmond Police Department that members of this department comply with the provisions of Government Code §7071 with respect to military equipment. Violations of this policy by member(s) of the Richmond Police Department will be investigated in accordance with the Department's Personnel Complaints policy.
707.3 MILITARY EQUIPMENT COORDINATOR
The Chief of Police shall designate a member of this department to act as the military equipment coordinator. The responsibilities of the military equipment coordinator include but are not limited to:
(a) Acting as a liaison to the City Council for matters related to the requirements of this policy.
(b) Identifying department equipment that qualifies as military equipment in the current possession of the Department, or the equipment the Department intends to acquire that requires approval by the City Council.
(c) Conducting an inventory of all military equipment at least annually. (d) Collaborating with any allied agency that may use military equipment within the jurisdiction of Richmond Police Department.
(e) Preparing for, scheduling, and coordinating the annual community engagement meeting to include:
1. Publicizing the details of the meeting.
2. Preparing for public questions regarding the department's funding, acquisition, and use of equipment.
(f) Preparing the annual military equipment report for submission to the Chief of Police (prior to submission to the City Council) and ensuring the report is made available on the departmentwebsite.
707.4 MILITARY EQUIPMENT INVENTORY
The following constitutes a list of qualifying equipment for the Richmond Police Department, as well as provides legal and procedural rules for use and training requirements.
Military Equipment Inventory
707.5 APPROVAL OF THIS POLICY
The Chief of Police or authorized designee shall obtain approval from the City Council by way of an ordinance approving the military equipment policy. As part of the approval process, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee shall ensure the proposed military equipment policy is submitted to the City Council, a public hearing is held, and the policy is available on the Department's website for at least 30 days prior to any public hearing concerning the military equipment at issue 967
Richmond Police Department
Richmond PD CA Policy Manual
Military Equipment Use Policy
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/10/18, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Richmond Police Department ***DRAFT*** Military Equipment Use Policy - 3 (Government Code §7071). The military equipment policy must be approved by the City Council prior to engaging in any of the following (Government Code §7071):
(a) Requesting military equipment made available pursuant to 10 USC § 2576a (b) Seeking funds for military equipment, including but not limited to applying for a grant, soliciting or accepting private, local, state, or federal funds, in-kind donations, or other donations or transfers.
(c) Acquiring military equipment either permanently or temporarily, including by borrowing or leasing.
(d) Collaborating with another law enforcement agency in the deployment or other use of military equipment within the jurisdiction of this department. (e) Using any new or existing military equipment for a purpose, in a manner, or by a person not previously approved by the City Council.
(f) Soliciting or responding to a proposal for, or entering into an agreement with, any other person or entity to seek funds for, apply to receive, acquire, use, or collaborate in the use of military equipment.
(g) Acquiring military equipment through any means not provided above.
The City Council must be able to make the following findings in approving the Military Equipment Use policy as required by Government Code §7071(d)(1) in order to use military equipment:
(a) The military equipment is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. (b) The proposed military equipment use policy will safeguard the public's welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties.
(c) If purchasing the equipment, the equipment is reasonably cost-effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety. (d) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment use policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment use policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance.
707.6 COORDINATION WITH OTHER JURISDICTIONS
Military equipment used by any member of this jurisdiction shall be approved for use and in accordance with this Department policy. Military equipment used by other jurisdictions that are providing mutual aid to this jurisdiction shall comply with their respective military equipment use policies in rendering mutual aid.
707.7 MILITARY EQUIPMENT ANNUAL REPORT
Upon approval of this military equipment policy, the Chief of Police or the authorized designee should submit a military equipment report to the City Council for each type of military equipment approved within one year of approval, and annually thereafter for as long as the military equipment 968
Richmond Police Department
Richmond PD CA Policy Manual
Military Equipment Use Policy
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/10/18, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Richmond Police Department ***DRAFT*** Military Equipment Use Policy - 4 is available for use (Government Code § 7072). In considering the annual report and ordinance annually, the City Council needs to consider whether it can continue to make the findings in California Government Code §7071(d)(1).
The Chief of Police or the authorized designee should also make each annual military equipment report publicly available on the department website for as long as the military equipment is available for use. The report shall include all information required by Government Code § 7072 for the preceding calendar year for each type of military equipment in department inventory. 707.8 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the annual report, the Department shall hold at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting, at which the Department should discuss the report and respond to public questions regarding the funding, acquisition, or use of military equipment.
707.9 COMMUNITY CONCERNS AND COMPLAINTS
Pursuant to Government Code §7070(d)(7), members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions by any of the following means:
1. Email: [email protected]
2. In-person or mail:
Richmond Police Department
Attn: AB481 Coordinator
1701 Regatta Boulevard, Richmond, CA 94804
The Department is committed to responding to complaints, concerns, and/or questions received and should respond within ten business days of receiving the correspondence. Any complaints shall be referred to the Community Police Review Commission as the independent oversight body.
All instances of non-compliance with the policy will also be reported to the City Council via the annual military equipment report.
707.10 MILITARY EQUIPMENT TRAINING
Military equipment shall only be used after applicable training, including any course required by the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (P.O.S.T.), has been completed unless exigent circumstances exist.
707.11 CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
Pursuant to California Government Code §7071, the City Council of Richmond approved this Policy pursuant to Ordinance ### on October 4, 2022. The City Attorney and City Council should be notified in writing of any changes to this policy. All amendments to the policy must be reviewed and approved by City Council.
969
Richmond Police Department
Richmond PD CA Policy Manual
Military Equipment Use Policy
Copyright Lexipol, LLC 2022/10/18, All Rights Reserved.
Published with permission by Richmond Police Department ***DRAFT*** Military Equipment Use Policy - 5 707.12 COMPLIANCE
The Department's AB481 Coordinator will ensure that Department members comply with this policy. The AB481 Coordinator will conduct an annual audit with assistance from members of the Office of Professional Accountability. Any violations will be referred to the Office of the Chief of Police and handled in accordance with the Department's Personnel Complaints policy. All instances of non-compliance will be reported to the City Council via the annual military equipment report.
970
DocID #15929v1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA ACCEPTING THE 2023 ANNUAL MILITARY EQUIPMENT REPORT , DETERMINING THAT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT’S USE OF MILITARY EQUIPMENT IN 2023 COMPLIED WITH THE DEPARTMENT’S MILITARY EQUIPMENT FUNDING, ACQUIS ITION, AND USE POLICY 707 AND APPLICABLE STATE LAW AND DETERMINING THAT POLICY 707 WILL BE CONTINUED
WITHOUT CHANGE
WHEREAS, on September 30, 2021, Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 481 ("AB 481") now codified in California Government Code Sections 7070 through 7075, relating to the use of military equipment by law enforcement in California; and
WHEREAS, requires the Richmond Police Department to have a military equipment use policy approved by the City Council prior to requesting, seeking funding, acquiring, collaborating with other jurisdiction about the deployment of military equipment, or using military equipment; and
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2022, the City Council adopted Ordinance 12-22 approving the Police Department’s Policy 707: Military Equipment Use Policy; and
WHEREAS Policy 707 adheres to the requirements of California Government Section 7070 et. seq. with respect to the funding, acquisition, and use of military equipment; and
WHEREAS, Policy 707, Ordinance 12-22, and Government Code Section 7072 requires the City to publish annually a military equipment report for the prior calendar year. This report summarizes the use of each type of military equipment approved by Policy 707, any complaints or concerns received about the military equipment, provides the results of any internal audits and information about violations of Policy 707, and any actions taken in response, provides the total annual cost for each type of approved military equipment and the source of funds for military equipment in the upcoming year, and inventories the quantity of each type of military equipment possessed and listing the quantity to be acquired in the upcoming year; and
WHEREAS, in addition, Policy 707, Ordinance 12-22, and Government Code section 7072 requires the Police Department to hold annually at least one well-publicized and conveniently located community engagement meeting within 30 days of submitting and publicly releasing the military equipment annual report; and
WHEREAS, under Government Code Section 7071(e)(1-2), the City Council must annually review Policy 707 and the military equipment annual report and determine 971
DocID #15929v1
whether each type of military equipment identified in the report has complied with all of the following standards: (1) The military equipment identified in the Policy is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; (2) Policy 707 will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties; (3) If purchasing equipment identified in the Policy, the equipment is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety; and (4) Prior military equipment use complied with the military equipment policy that was in effect at the time, or if prior uses did not comply with the accompanying military equipment policy, corrective action has been taken to remedy nonconforming uses and ensure future compliance; and
WHEREAS, after reviewing the military equipment annual report, and Policy 707, under Government Code Section 7071(e)(1), the City Council must vote annually whether to continue Policy 707 without change or direct staff to return at a future City Council meeting with a proposed ordinance for the City Council’s consideration to amend or repeal Policy 707 and Ordinance 12-22; and
WHEREAS, on February 2, 2024, the Police Department published its 2023 Annual Military Equipment Report to its website; and
WHEREAS, on February 5, 2024, the Police Department presented the 2023 Annual Military Equipment Report to the Richmond Police Department’s Community Engagement meeting via Zoom and notice of that meeting was publicized on the City’s and Police Department’s websites on January 24, 2024; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department retains and employs limited military equipment to safeguard the safety of the public and staff, and there are no tools or resources that are reasonable alternatives to achieve the same safety objectives than use of the military equipment listed in the Policy; and
WHEREAS, Policy 707 safeguards the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties; and
WHEREAS, the Police Department adheres to the City’s purchasing policies when purchasing military equipment; and
WHEREAS, an audit of the Police Department’s use of military equipment in 2023 concluded that the use fully complied with Policy 707.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the foregoing recitations are true and correct, and are included herein by reference as findings;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Richmond accepts the 2023 Annual Military Equipment Report.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that based on the 2023 Annual Military Equipment 972
DocID #15929v1
Report, Ordinance 12-22 N.S, and Policy 707, the City Council determines as follows:
1. Each type of military equipment identified in Policy 707 is necessary because there is no reasonable alternative that can achieve the same objective of officer and civilian safety;
2. Policy 707 will safeguard the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties;
3. The equipment described in Policy 707 is reasonably cost effective compared to available alternatives that can achieve the same objectives of officer and civilian safety; and
4. The Department’s use of military equipment has complied with Policy 707 and the projected acquisition request for 2024 are approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby determines that Richmond Police Department Policy 707: Military Equipment Use Policy – which was approved by City Council upon adoption of Ordinance 12-22 on October 18, 2022 – shall be continued without change.
*******
ADOPTED this 7th day of May, 2024, by the following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSTENTIONS:
ABSENT:
CLERK OF THE CITY OF
RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:
Mayor
Approved as to form:
City Attorney
973
DocID #15929v1
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. _____, finally passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on Mmmm dd, yyyy.
Clerk of the City of Richmond
974
AB 481: Military Equipment Annual
Report
Captain John Lopez
May 7, 2024
975
Agenda
• Introduction & Mission Statement
• Assembly Bill 481
• Definitions of Military Equipment
• Richmond Police Department’s Equipment Inventory
• Equipment Use Summary
• Projected Acquisitions for 2024
• Summary of Complaints / Concerns for 2023
• Fiscal Impact & Training Cost
• Final Thoughts
• Questions & Answers
976
Introduction & Mission
OUR MISSION
The mission of the Richmond Police
Department is to prevent crime and
maintain order.
We work in partnership with our
diverse community to help solve
neighborhood problems, address root
causes of crime and improve the
quality of life in Richmond.
We strive to perform in a manner that
promotes public trust, confidence and
a sense of safety and security.
977
What is Assembly Bill 481
978
“Military Equipment” means the
following:
1. U n m a n n e d a e r i a l o r g r o u n d v e h i c l e s
2. M R A P v e h i c l e s
3. H u m v e e s / V e h i c l e s w i t h b r e a c h i n g
4. T r a c k e d a r m o r e d v e h i c l e s
5. C o m m a n d a n d c o n t r o l v e h i c l e s
6. W e a p o n i z e d a i r c r a f t , v e s s e l s
7. B r e a c h i n g a p p a r a t u s e x p l o s i v e i n n a t u r e
8. F i r e a r m s & a m m o o f . 5 0 c a l i b e r o r g r e a t e r
9. A s s a u l t w e a p o n s l e s s t h a n . 5 0 c a l i b e r
10. A n y f i r e a r m o r a c c e s s o r y d e s i g n e d t o l a u n c h e x p l o s i v e p r o j e c t i l e s
11. D i v i s i o n a r y d e v i c e s & e x p l o s i v e b r e a c h i n g
12. M u n i t i o n s c o n t a i n i n g t e a r g a s o r O C
13. T a s e r S h o c k w a v e , m i c r o w a v e w e a p o n s , L R A D s
14. K i n e t i c e n e r g y w e a p o n s a n d m u n i t i o n s ( 4 0 m m l a u n c h e r , b e a n b a g s h o t g u n , f o a m t i p p e d p r o j e c t i l e s )
15. A n y o t h e r e q u i p m e n t a s d e t e r m i n e d b y a g o v e r n i n g b o d y t o r e q u i r e o v e r s i g h t 979
The Purpose of the
Equipment
While the Richmond Police Department’s inventory of “military equipment” is varied, the mere possession of the equipment does not warrant its use for every incident. The Richmond Police Department recognizes that critical incidents are unpredictable and can be very dynamic in nature.
A variety of military equipment options can greatly assist incident commanders, officers, and specific units in bringing those incidents to a swift resolution in a safe manner. The use of military equipment is restricted for use only in certain instances and in some cases only by certain units.
980
RPD’s Equipment Inventory
Category 1 – Robot & Unmanned Aircraft
Tactical Robot
Small Unmanned Tracked Robots: An unmanned tracked robot of any type that is capable of being remotely controlled as well as all of the supporting or attached systems designed for gathering information through imaging, recording or by any other means.
Capability: Small Unmanned Tracked Robots can support first responders in any hazardous incident which would benefit from a ground level perspective. These uses could include barricaded suspects or high-risk tactical operations, disaster response, and use in crawl spaces or confined isolated areas to assist in searches for suspects or evidence.
Usage: Small Unmanned Tracked Robots are to be used exclusively by the SWAT unit during high risk operations.
Quantity: 1
Unmanned Aircraft Systems
Description: An unmanned aircraft of any type that is capable of sustaining directed flight, whether pre-programmed or remotely controlled, and all of the supporting or attached systems designed for gathering information through imaging, recording or by any other means.
Capability: UAS can support first responders in any hazardous incident which would benefit from an aerial perspective. These uses could include search and rescue, barricaded suspects or high-risk tactical operations, disaster response, and video and photographic documentation of crime scenes.
Usage: Any use of a UAS will be in strict accordance with constitutional and privacy rights and FAA regulations. Only authorized operators who have completed the required training shall be permitted to operate the UAS.
Quantity: 8
981
RPD’s Equipment Inventory
Category 5 – Mobile Command Center
Mobile Command Vehicle
Mobile Command Vehicles: Completely self-contained command posts designed to provide the Incident Commander with a mobile base of operation. Some majo r incidents engender special management challenges and require an on-site incident command structure to assist senior personnel in addressing the circumstance presented by the inciden t. The Mobile Command Center is a vital component to the police mission when major emergencies, natural and man-made disasters or special events in the community trigger the mobilization and coordination of significant resources in the field. Its primary use is to facilitate the management and coordination of personnel, communications, and equipment resources at complex incidents.
Capability: As a mobile base of operation, these vehicles contain specialized command, control, and communications equipment to assist with this mission.
Usage: Mobile Command Vehicles are to be utilized as an Incident Command Post for planned or unplanned events.
Quantity: 1
982
RPD’s Equipment Inventory
Category 7 – Breaching Shotguns & Projectiles
Breaching Shotguns and Breaching Ammunition
Breaching Shotguns and Breaching Ammunition: During crisis situations, it may become necessary for a SWAT team to facilitate an entry in to a target location. It is critical the point of entry is breached quickly and as safely as possible. A quick and effective breach is one key to a successful tactical mission. In some instances, a breach initiated by a breaching shotgun loaded with specialized breaching rounds may be required to provide an added degree of safety and tactical advantage in order to accomplish a mission.
Specialized Breaching Rounds, are frangible and are designed break into a powder form upon impact with a solid object (i.e. dead bolt lock, door frame, etc.) The Richmond Police Department possesses a limited inventory of Breaching Shotguns and Breaching Shotgun Ammunition. Breaching Shotguns are to be used exclusively by trained members of t he Richmond SWAT Unit.
Capability: Breaching shotguns and breaching rounds can be an effective option to defeat fortified doors and locks. This ammunition provides tactical officers rapid entry to locked rooms while minimizing the risk to victims, officers, and suspects.
Usage: Breaching shotguns are to be exclusively used by the SWAT Unit. Breaching shotguns are used to breach doors expeditiously and can be used in response to barricaded suspects, hostage rescue incidents, and active shooters.
Training requirements: SWAT Officers that are trained in the use of breaching shotguns must successfully complete a SWAT Breaching course or in -house training from a breaching instructor. Furthermore, SWAT Officers must undergo live fire proficiency training in its application.
Quantity: 2 Remington 870 Police Magnum – modified 12 gauge breaching shotgun 983
RPD’s Equipment Inventory
Category 9 – Rifles, SMGs, and Bullets
Patrol Rifles
Description: A semi-automatic shoulder-fired long gun that fires a rifle caliber cartridge. The Department-approved AR-15 style (Colt M4) weapon system is designed to fire a .223/5.56 caliber projectile. As stated in RPD PM 432.1 – Purpose and Scope, “In order to more effectively and accurately address the increasing level of firepower and body armor utilized by criminal suspects, the Richmond Police Department will make Patrol Rifles available to qualified patrol officers as an additional and more immediate tactical resource.” Capability: The rifle caliber carbine provides officers the ability to engage hostile suspects at distances generally greater than the effective distance of their handguns. Additionally, patrol rifles offer advantages over handguns, such as increased accuracy potential and the ability to defeat soft body armor but are not appropriate for every situation.
Usage: Officers may use rifles in the following situations:
a) When there is an objectively reasonable anticipation of an armed encounter. b) When an officer is faced with a situation that may require the delivery of accurate and effective fire at long range. c) Situations where an officer reasonably expects the need to meet or exceed a suspect’s firepower. d) When an officer reasonably believes that there may be a need to deliver fire on a barricaded suspect or a suspect with a hostage. e) When an officer reasonably believes that a suspect may be wearing body armor. f) When authorized or requested by a supervisor
g) When needed to euthanize an animal
Quantity:
Colt M4 Carbine 5.56 Quantity: 50 Patrol
Colt M4 / M16 A2E 5.56 Quantity: 13 SWAT ONLY
Colt Commando 5.56 Quantity: 2 SWAT ONLY
DPMS M-160 5.56 Quantity: 5 SWAT ONLY
Colt M16 A2 5.56 Quantity: 2 SWAT ONLY
Colt AR15 Match Target .223 Quantity: 8 (Richmond Honor Guard Presentation) H&R Arms M14 7.62 Quantity: 1 (Weapon is decommissioned) H&K SMG 9mm Quantity: 17 SWAT ONLY
984
RPD’s Equipment Inventory
Category 11 – Diversionary Devices
Diversion Devices (Flash Bangs)
Description: Canisters that emit a loud noise and bright light.
Capability: Diversionary Devices are capable of releasing large amounts of stored energy in the form of heat, light, pressure, and noise. They are intended to temporarily distract, confuse, and disorient subjects. They can also be used as “attention-getting” devices.
Usage: Generally, flash/sound diversionary devices may be considered whenever the use of a less lethal diversion would help facilitate entry, enabling arrest and potentially reducing the risk of injury by disorientation of potentially dangerous suspects and/or animals. Diversion devices shall only be used for distraction purposes. Circumstances for the use of flash/sound diversionary devices include: 1. Barricaded suspect and/or hostage situations. 2. High-risk warrant services. 3. Disperse potentially violent animals. 4. When the SRT Commander or SWAT Commander deems their use necessary to safely resolve an incident.
Training Requirements: SWAT and TRT operators must successfully complete in-house training from a certified instructor and are subject to ongoing practical application training in the use of the Diversionary Devices.
Additionally, SWAT and TRT operators trainon safe device deployment in a variety of operational settings annually.
QUANTITY: 120
985
RPD’s Equipment Inventory
Category 12 – Chemical Agents & Impact Munitions
Chemical Agents and Chemical Agent Delivery Devices: Compounds, devices, and delivery systems utilized by trained officers. The deployment of chemical agents is a tactical option that may be selected with the goal of protecting life and property and/or restoration of order. It is considered a "use of force" option and consistent with the RPD use of force policy Capability: Depending on the delivery method, chemical agents are capable of being introduced in close proximity or from a distance. Depe nding on the type of delivery system and/or quantity, chemical agents can be used to saturate individual suspects, violent crowds, or areas of varied size.
Usage: Chemical agents are to be used specifically trained officers. Generally, during high risk tactical incidents chemical agents can be used to dislodge a suspect from a stronghold location with the least possible danger to citizens, police, and the suspect. Chemical agents can also be used to prevent an armed suspect from accurately firing at citizens and/or officers. They can also be used in limited instances during civil unrest when objectively reasonable to defend against a threat to life or serious bodily injury to any individual, including the officer, or to bring an objectively dangerous and unlawful situation safely and effectively under control. See Penal Code 13652.
Training Requirements: Only personnel trained and having shown proficiency in the use of any control device are authorized to carry the device. Proficiency training must be conducted and documented by a Department approved instructor; as set in RPD PM Section 308
986
RPD’s Equipment Inventory
Category 14 – Kinetic Energy / Less lethal platforms
Beanbag Shotguns
Description: This is a standard Remington Model 870, 12-gauge shotgun that has been modified with an orange stock and fore-end.
Capability: Beanbag shotguns are capable of firing a 12-gauge beanbag round with a maximum effective range of sixty (60) feet.
Usage: Beanbag shotguns utilized with beanbag rounds may be deployed to impact subjects demonstrating assaultive behavior or life-threatening behavior, as defined RPD Policy Manual Section 308.8.1
Training Requirements: Officers shall not carry or use any less-lethal device unless they have successfully completed Departmental training or approved external training. Officers shall be required to successfully complete annual training and qualification conducted by a certified instructor in order to maintain their authority to deploy less-lethal devices. Any officer who fails to qualify or who fails to successfully complete two or more department sanctioned training/qualification sessions within a calendar year will no longer be authorized to carry the shotgun or less-lethal device without successfully retaking the initial training and qualification.
Quantity: 1
40mm Launchers
Description: A single shot or multi-shot Extended Range Impact Weapon (ERIW) launcher capable for firing a variety of 40mm rounds. The Department also has a limited inventory of 37mm launchers that share the same characteristics as 40mm launchers but are chambered for 37mm munitions. (40mm launchers and 37mm launchers are considered “Projectile Launch Platforms” under AB-481).
Capability: 40mm launchers are capable of firing a variety of munitions with a maximum effective range of one hundred twenty (120) feet. 40mm launchers can deliver 40mm munitions in the form of chemical agents, sponge baton rounds, or combined use sponge baton OC chemical agent rounds.
Usage: 40mm launchers utilized with less lethal sponge baton rounds are may be deployed to impact subjects demonstrating assaultive behavior or life-threatening behavior. The Richmond Police Department is committed to reducing the potential for violent confrontations. Kinetic energy projectiles, when used properly, are less likely to result in death or serious physical injury and can be used in an attempt to de-escalate a potentially deadly situations, as defined in Policy Manual 308.9. Only department approved kinetic energy munitions shall be carried and deployed. Approved munitions may be used to compel an individual to cease his/her actions when such munitions present a reasonable option. 987
Equipment Use Summary
UNMANNED AERIAL SYSTEMS (UAS / DRONES)
Unmanned Aerial Systems were utilized a total of 120 times during this reporting period.
Authorized usages:
• Collect aerial photographic and video evidence in support of an investigation (e.g., crime scene documentation of shootings, homicides, officer-involved shootings). (6 uses) • Support SWAT and patrol during high-risk, tactical, or other public safety life-preservation missions (e.g., interior visual assessments of structures or outdoor areas to gain intelligence prior to officers entering a dwelling or contacting a potentially armed, or resistive subject that may be hiding). (42 uses) • Conduct overwatch and intelligence gathering for investigative, specialty units, and SRT during critical incidents and investigations. (6 uses)
• Assisting patrol with establishing overwatch during perimeter searches. (66) 988
Equipment Use Summary
TACTICAL ROBOT
The Tactical Robot was deployed/utilized 0 times during this reporting period.
ARMORED PERSONNEL CARRIER (RESCUE VEHICLE)
From January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023, the Richmond Police Department utilized East Bay Regional’s BATT 9 times.
Authorized Usages:
• Support SWAT during critical incidents and pre-planned operations by providing greater safety to community members and officers.
• Higher degree of ballistic protection during high-risk operations • The use of a rescue vehicle is extremely vital to ensure the communities safety and ensure mission success.
MOBILE COMMAND CENTER
The Mobile Command Center (MCC) was used a total of 8 times during this reporting period.
Authorized usages:
• Serves as a command post for critical incidents during complex events • Special Events (RPD Connect, Cinco De Mayo, Juneteenth) • DUI Checkpoint command post
989
Equipment Use Summary
BREACHING SHOTGUN
The Breaching shotguns (Remington 870) were utilized 2 times in 2023.
Authorized usages:
• SWAT Team operations for High Risk warrant services
LESS LETHAL SHOTGUNS AND MUNITIONS
Less Lethal Beanbag shotguns (Remington 870) was used 1 time during this reporting period.
Authorized usages:
• Confront armed person and the tactical circumstances allow for the safe application of approved munitions.
DIVERSIONARY DEVICES
Diversionary Devices (flashbangs) were utilized 38 times during this reporting period.
Authorized usages:
• To facilitate high-risk entries during warrant services, enabling arrest and reducing the risk of injury by disorientation of potentially dangerous suspects and/or animals.
• Used as a distraction device during all incidents
990
Equipment Use Summary
RIFLES AND AMMUNITION
Rifles were utilized 2 times during this reporting period.
Authorized usages:
• There is an objectively reasonable anticipation of an armed encounter. • Used in accordance with California Penal Code § 835 and RPD PM 300.3.2
CHEMICAL AGENTS AND SMOKE CANISTERS
Chemical Agents and Smoke Canisters were used 0 times during this reporting period. 40mm LAUNCHERS AND MUNITIONS
40mm Launchers were used by the Richmond Police Department 4 times during this period. • Impact rounds (9)
• OC rounds (4)
• CS rounds (0)
• Authorized usages:
Encountering an armed person with a weapon and the tactical circumstances allow for the safe application There is probable cause to believe that the person has already committed a crime of violence and is refusing to comply with lawful orders.
PEPPERBALL LAUNCHERS AND PROJECTILES
Pepper-ball launchers and projectiles were used 0 times during this reporting period. 991
Projected Acquisitions for
2024
Categories of consumables are as follows:
• Ammunition- all calibers
• Diversionary Devices
• Chemical Agents and Smoke Canisters
• Specialty Munitions (40mm and Less Lethal Munitions)
• Kinetic Energy Rounds
992
Projected Acquisitions for
2024
Non-consumable are as follows:
• Multipurpose Response & Rescue Vehicle
As the SWAT team is responsible for responding to all incidents that exceed the capability of patrol within our jurisdiction, including terrorist attacks, hostage situations, and mass shooting incidents, we hereby request permission to seek funding to purchase a tactical multipurpose Response and Rescue Vehicle. - Projected funding source: State/Federal Grants, Asset Seizure, General Fund • DJI Mavic 3E Drone
-Projected funding source: Budgeted for FY2023-24
• DJI Matrice 30T Drone
-Projected funding source: Budgeted for FY2023-24
• (2) DJI Mavic 3 Thermal Drone
-Projected funding source: Budged for FY2024-25
• Requests the borrowing of a Ballistic Armored Tactical Transport vehicle) from the Department of East Bay Regional Parks Police Department for use with the clear understanding that such equipment will be solely used by the Richmond SWAT team for high-risk tactical situations (high-risk warrant services or critical incidents such as hostage rescues, active shooters, barricaded shooters) to preserve life and protect the community members of Richmond. 993
Summary of Complaints /
Concerns from 2023
The Richmond Police Department is committed to responding to complaints, concerns and/or questions received in a timely manner. During this reporting period, there were 0 formal complaints. The Richmond Police Department did not have any policy violations with the deployment or use of military equipment.
Pursuant to California Government Code §7070(d)(7), members of the public may register complaints or concerns or submit questions about the use of each specific type of military equipment in this policy by any of the following means:
1. Via email to: [email protected]
2. Via phone call to: 510-620-6675
3. Via mail sent to: Richmond Police Department, 1701 Regatta Blvd, Richmond, CA, 94801 994
Summary of Complaints /
Concerns from 2023
Officer-Involved Shootings (OIS) and Discharge of Military Equipment Firearm:
There was 1 OIS incident during this reporting period that involved the use of military equipment:
→ June 28, 2023: A search warrant was authorized and served at 1293 Sanderling Island in Richmond by members of the Richmond Tactical Response Team (TRT). The search warrant was the culmination of several firearm brandishing reports taken by patrol, and hours of surveillance by Richmond Police Intelligence officers. The person suspected of brandishing a firearm was located and arrested for the related firearm warrant charges. On June 28th, a search warrant was authorized for the search of 1293 Sanderling Island. A clear knock and notice was given at the front door by TRT members and again inside the residence after entry was made. During the service, a male subject was contacted inside in an upstairs bedroom. The subject pointed a loaded AR-15 rifle at TRT members. Two officers immediately discharged their duty rifles striking the male subject. The subject was pronounced deceased at the scene. → Subsequent search of the residence yields:
▪ 53 firearms (20 Rifles, 23 Pistols, 8 Revolvers, 2 Shotguns) ▪ Live hand-grenade
▪ Over a thousand rounds of ammunition
▪ Firearm manufacturing equipment
995
Fiscal Impact
Equipment Quantity Acquisitions Annual Maintenance / Replacement Cost Total Cost
1. UAS 9 $ 1,888 $ 2,000 $ 3,888
2. Mobile Command Center 1 $ - $ 196 $ 196
3. Tactical Robot 1 $ - $ - $ -
4. Breaching Shotguns 2 $ - $ 100 $ 100
5. Breaching Rounds 300 $ - $ 1,500 $ 1,500
6. Rifles 80 $ - $ 1,000 $ 1,000
7. Rifle Ammunition 10,000 $ 29,281 $ 30,000 $ 59,281
8. Diversion Devices 200 $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000
9. Chemical Agents 199 $ 3,026 $ 2,000 $ 5,026
10. Beanbag Shotgun 17 $ - $ 100 $ 100
11. Direct Impact munitions 700 $ 5,802 $ 1,500 $ 7,302
12. Direct Impact Launchers 13 $ - $ 500 $ 500
996
Training Cost
40-Hour Chemical Agent Instructor Course
Objective: To gain skills and knowledge necessary to become an instructor and instruct Richmond Police Officer’s in the use of Chemical Agents.
Attendees: One (1) Sergeant
Course Location: San Diego, Ca.
Registration Cost: $2,110.00; Hotel Cost: $1,019.81; Travel Cost: $392.97; Rental Car: $545.65 Grand Total Cost: $4,068.43
16-Hour Chemical Agent Instructor Course
Objective: To gain skills and knowledge necessary to become an instructor and instruct Richmond Police Officer’s in the use of Chemical Agents.
Attendees: Two (2) Officers
Course Location: Elk Grove, Ca.
Registration Cost: $229.00; Mileage: $253.35
Grand Total Cost: $482.35
Less Lethal Weapon & Diversionary Devices Instructor Training Objective: To obtain training to become a proficient less lethal weapons instructor.
Attendees: Two (2) Officers
Course Location: Sacramento, Ca.
Registration Cost: $1,252; Mileage: $357.24
Grand Total Cost: $1,609.24
997
Training Cost
Unmanned Aircraft Systems Basic Pilots Course
Objective: To obtain FAA certification to be legally authorized to operate an Unmanned Aircraft Systems unit.
Attendees: Three (3) Officers
Course Location: San Leandro, Ca.
Registration Cost: $2,997; Lodging: $1,165.80; Mileage: $98.51 Grand Total Cost: $4,261.31
Penn Arms Armorer’s Course
Objective: To gain skills and knowledge necessary to maintain and repair Richmond Police Department’s firearms; including the 40mm launchers.
Attendees: One (1) Sergeant
Course Location: Burlingame, Ca.
Registration Cost: $325.00; Mileage: $84.10
Grand Total Cost: $409.10
Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) School
Objective: POST Certified basic SWAT course for all new SWAT Team members.
Attendees: Three (3) Officers
Course Location: Elk Grove, Ca.
Registration Cost: $3,909; Lodging: $4,779.07; Mileage: $1190.79 Grand Total Cost: $9,878.86
Rifle Marksmanship and Sniper Observer Course
Objective: Necessary course to achieve the minimum qualification to become a designated marksman.
Attendees: Three (3) Officers, One (1) Sergeant, One (1) Lieutenant Course Location: San Luis Obispo and Dublin, Ca.
Registration Cost: $4,088.00; Lodging: $4,292.48; Mileage: $617.01 Grand Total Cost: $8,997.49
Total AB481 Trainings: $29,706.78
998
Final Thoughts
999
Questions & Comments
Contact US:
Richmond Police Department
1701 Regatta Blvd
Richmond, CA 94804
Email: [email protected]
Non-Emergency Phone: 510-233-1214
Records Department: 510-620-6675
1000