Richmond City Council
August 26, 2025

Request for Proposals
Engineering & Design Services
Parchester Village – Giant Highway Infrastructure
Master Plan
Release Date:

April 24, 2025
Deadline for Submittal:

May 22, 2025
Contact: Janney Lockman, Associate Planner
Email: [email protected]
Phone Number: 510-307-8097
City of Richmond
Public Works – Engineering Department
1205

1. INTRODUCTION
The City of Richmond, California is seeking to develop a comprehensive infrastructure plan for the Parchester Village neighborhood and the segment of Giant Highway and Collins Avenue adjacent to Parchester Village (See Exhibit 1:

Parchester Village Infrastructure Study Area Map) with recommendations for transportation and infrastructure improvements to support safety, access, placemaking, and resilience for the neighborhood. The plan will evaluate and develop recommendations to improve storm drainage conditions to address flooding issues; improve pedestrian, transit, and bicycle safety and access; and improve pavement conditions.

This Request for Proposal (RFP) describes the project, the required scope of services, the consultant selection process, and the required information that must be included in the proposal. Failure to submit information in accordance with the RFP requirements and procedures may be cause for disqualification. The anticipated term of this contract will be for a period of up to two (2) years.

This RFP is for Phase I of the project only; a second phase to design 30% plans for select improvements will be funded and procured separately.

2. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Scope of Work
All work products shall become the property of the City and be submitted to the City for review.

Task 0: Project Management
• Consultant shall manage and coordinate a kick-off meeting with City Staff within 10 days after contract execution to discuss the project goals, scope, schedule, introduction of the project team, and request any required existing conditions information that the City may have.
• Consultant shall manage, coordinate monthly meetings with City Staff. Consultant shall set monthly ongoing meetings and distribute agendas, lead monthly meetings, prepare, and distribute meeting minutes, and responsibility matrix after each meeting to all project team members.
• Consultant shall coordinate with City staff, other applicable regulatory agencies, and other entities as required to complete the scope of work described herein. • Consultant shall prepare and update a project schedule with tasks and milestones that corresponds with anticipated project timeline laid out in the RFP. Project schedule should be updated with each milestone, or any changes that would result in a change of schedule of more than two weeks. Consultant shall break down the schedule by logistical tasks consistent with the scope of work and with enough detail to track project progress. The schedule must reflect realistic estimates of review periods by City staff for tasks, such as reports, plans, and 1206

coordination.
• Consultant shall prepare monthly progress reports that shall provide current information regarding the project schedule complete/ upcoming deliverables, problems encountered that may affect the schedule, budget of work products and anticipated work items, and identify activities for the following month. • Consultant shall ensure compliance with current with applicable state and federal laws and regulations, and with any requirements from funding agencies.

Estimated Project Timeline:
• April - May 2025 - Request for Proposals and Consultant Selection • June 2025 – City Council Approval, issuance of notice to proceed • July 2025 - Phase I Project Kick-Off
• July 2025 – November 2025 - Data Collection, Outreach, Studies, and Analysis
• December 2025 – February 2026 – Compile Recommendations and Draft Plan
• Early 2026 - Return to Community and City Council for Plan Adoption and direction for prioritization and next steps
• 2026 – 2027 - 30% Design of Priority Improvements TO BE COMPLETED THROUGH A SEPARATE PROJECT PHASE.

Deliverables for Task 0:
• Project Schedule and regular schedule updates
• Monthly progress reports
Task 1: Data Collection and Site Analysis
This task will include the necessary data collection, surveying, geotechnical investigations, and analysis to inform future tasks.
• The Consultant shall research and review existing topographic mapping, right-ofway maps, “as-built” plans, record maps, surveys, assessor maps, improvement plans, and other characteristics for the project area.
• Consultant shall conduct field reconnaissance within the project limits to assess existing conditions for:
o Pedestrian access and walkways (sidewalk width and condition, crosswalks, ADA-compliant curb ramps, lighting, signage, etc.)
o Approximate location of underground and above-ground utilities o Storm drainage systems and evidence of ponding issues (catch basins, storm drain inlets, etc.)
o Pavement conditions (surface distress, cracking, potholes, etc.) 1207

o Locations and conditions of existing trees, landscaping, and any green infrastructure
• Consultant shall conduct field surveys that include collecting topographic information and locating and referencing existing City survey monumentation and adopting City basis of horizontal and vertical control. • Consultant shall pothole existing utilities to verify their locations/elevations working in coordination with the City.
• Consultant shall conduct a traffic study and obtain existing traffic, bicycle, pedestrian, and parking data for the area as necessary for design. • Consultant shall be responsible for obtaining utility as-built plans from various agencies. Consultant will prepare and transmit project notification to utilities with a request to identify existing and proposed facilities. • Consultant shall identify required permits, prepare all permit applications, and assist the City with negotiations relative to permit conditions, if required. Permit fees will be paid by the City.
• Consultant shall review and comply with existing City’s documents, including but not limited to: General Plan, Bicycle and Pedestrian Action Plan, Local Road Safety Plan, Bicycle Master Plan, and Pedestrian Master Plan. • Consultant shall review existing floodplain, watershed, tidal, and other waterrelated mapping sources for the study area to determine current and anticipated impacts.

Deliverables for Task 1:
• Data collection and site analysis summary.
• Traffic study and results.
• Field reconnaissance results.
• Survey of utilities in the study area.

Task 2: Stakeholder and Community Engagement
This project will include a robust public outreach and stakeholder engagement phase to understand key issues and community concerns in order to inform development, design, and prioritization of recommendations.

Stakeholders for this project include (but are not limited to): Parchester Village residents, transit riders, pedestrians, cyclists, businesses along the Giant Highway, AC Transit, the Richmond Fire and Police Departments, and BNSF.

The selected consultant team will partner with the City of Richmond to conduct outreach.

Outreach will include in-person and virtual community meetings, a survey and resident interviews about specific needs related to transportation, access, and drainage issues, and development of any collateral materials (flyers, emails) for spreading the word about the meetings, survey, interviews and project. An anticipated three (3) community meetings are expected for this project: two (2) to gather input from residents, businesses, and key stakeholders on concerns 1208

and desired improvements for Parchester Village and the Giant Highway, and one (1) after initial plan recommendations have been developed, to conduct a prioritization exercise to determine which improvements should be designed and completed first.

The selected consultant will also engage relevant City of Richmond departments, public agencies, and organizations involved in transportation, stormwater management, or public safety, including but not limited to: Public Works Department, Planning Department, Police Department, Fire Department, California Public Utilities Commission, AC Transit, and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway.

The proposer may include additional services suggesting additional components that may or may not include attending community events, corridor site walks or virtual workshops to engage community members in potential changes. All outreach materials should be available in Spanish and English.

Deliverables for Task 2:
• Community engagement summary report that summarizes engagement activities, feedback, and recommendations from community members and plan stakeholders.
• Results of prioritization exercise and recommendations for which areas and improvements to focus future design and construction funds.

Task 3: Transportation Infrastructure Assessment & Recommendations Using the data collected and outreach completed in Tasks 1 & 2 the selected consultant shall complete a transportation infrastructure assessment and develop recommendations that enhance multimodal safety and mobility.

3.1 Pedestrian Assessment & Recommendations
• Identify areas where pedestrian improvements are needed (e.g., new sidewalks, sidewalk repair, crosswalks, etc.).
• Evaluate the existing sidewalks for safety, connectivity, and ADA accessibility. • Develop recommendations to enhance pedestrian infrastructure to support safety and access by closing sidewalk gaps, improving pedestrian crossings, and installing ADA-compliant curb ramps.
• Evaluate options for improving street lighting alongside Giant Highway.

3.2 Bicycle Assessment & Recommendations:
• The Richmond Bicycle and Pedestrian Action Plan recommends a Class IV bikeway on this portion of Giant Highway. The selected consultant will consider alignment, placement, and facility width.
1209

3.3Transit Stop Assessment & Recommendations:
• Parchester Village is currently served by AC Transit Line 71, which travels from the Richmond Parkway Transit Center to the El Cerrito Plaza BART Station. Review existing bus stop conditions and make recommendations for improving passenger access and comfort at the Griffin Dr. & McGlothen Way and Phanor Dr. & McGlothen Way stops.

3.4 Multimodal Assessment & Recommendations:
• Assess options for improvements to the railroad crossing and intersection at Giant Highway/Collins Avenue/Griffin Drive
• Consider emergency access improvements and evacuation routes. • Consider opportunities for placemaking, such street trees, and public art.

Deliverables for Task 3:
• Transportation Infrastructure Assessment Report
• Recommendations and conceptual design for pedestrian, bicycle, transit, and multimodal improvements.
• Rough order of magnitude (ROM) cost estimates for recommended improvements.

Task 4: Utility and Storm Drainage System Assessment & Recommendations Using the data collected and outreach completed in Tasks 1 & 2 the selected consultant shall complete a Utility and Storm Drainage System Assessment and develop recommendations to address existing drainage issues, and options for the PG&E poles on the western side of Giant Highway.

4.1 Storm Drainage System Assessment & Recommendations
• Evaluate existing location and condition of storm drainage infrastructure. • Assess storm drainage infrastructure throughout the study area, identify drainage issues contributing to current flooding and ponding. • Analyze the capacity and functionality of the storm drain system in the project area.
• Recommend improvements that could be made to address and prevent flooding and drainage issues. (e.g., drainage upgrades, additional stormwater treatment, repairs).
• Consider opportunities for green infrastructure to alleviate flooding and drainage issues.
• Evaluate potential impacts of sea level rise on existing drainage infrastructure and consider community resilience in recommendations.

4.2 PG&E Pole Assessment & Recommendations
1210

• Assess options for undergrounding or relocating PG&E poles on the western side of Giant Highway.
• Develop recommendations for undergrounding or relocation.

Deliverables for Task 4:
• Utility and Storm Drainage Infrastructure Assessment Report. • Recommendations for stormwater management and drainage improvements to address current drainage issues.
• Recommendations for undergrounding or relocating PG&E poles. • Rough order of magnitude (ROM) cost estimates for recommended improvements.

Task 5 Pavement Condition Assessment & Recommendations
• Conduct a pavement condition survey to assess current surface distress, cracks, potholes, and overall pavement quality.
• Identify areas of significant deterioration and prioritize repair needs. • Recommend pavement rehabilitation, repair, or replacement strategies.

Deliverables for Task 5:
• Pavement Condition Assessment report.
• Pavement improvement recommendations.
• Rough order of magnitude (ROM) cost estimates for recommended improvements.

Task 6: Infrastructure Master Plan Development
This task will combine findings from Tasks 3, 4, and 5 to create a comprehensive infrastructure master plan for Parchester Village.
• Include ROM cost estimates and approximate timelines for each recommended improvement.
• Using results of prioritization exercise in Task 2, recommend a phased implementation strategy for infrastructure upgrades.

Deliverables for Task 6:
• Draft Infrastructure Plan document with concept designs, cost estimates, and implementation strategy.
• Executive summary of the plan.

Task 7: City Council Support
The selected consultant will prepare a presentation, staff report, resolution, and other documents needed to provide updates to City Council on the status of the Infrastructure Plan development and present the draft infrastructure plan to the Richmond City Council for adoption.

The selected consultant should plan to attend two Richmond City Council meetings:
1211

one after initial data analysis and outreach has been completed to provide an update on plan development progress, and one to present the draft infrastructure plan for adoption.

Deliverables for Task 7:
• Draft Staff Reports (2)
• Draft Resolutions (1 – only needed for Infrastructure Plan adoption) • Presentations for City Council (2)
• Consultant attendance at 2 Richmond City Council Meetings • Final adopted infrastructure plan

RFP SCHEDULE
Date Activity
April 24, 2025 Release RFP
May 9, 2025 Final Day to Submit Questions (5:00 PM)
May 15, 2025 Responses to Questions posted on
BidsOnline
May 22, 2025 Proposal Due Date (12:00 PM)
Week of May 27, 2025 Interviews, Final Selection and Contract Negotiations
June 24, 2025 Anticipated Award of Contract at City
Council
July 1, 2025 Anticipated Notice to Proceed
4 Proposal format guidelines
The proposal should be concise, well organized, and demonstrate the proposer’s qualifications and experience applicable to the Project. The proposal shall be limited to 20 one-sided pages (8.5 inches x 11 inches), inclusive of graphics, forms, pictures, photographs, dividers, etcetera, but not of cost proposal, resumes, required forms, certifications, front and back covers, or letters of commitment from sub-consultants.

The required font size is 12 point, with minimum left and right margins of one inch, and top and bottom margins of 0.7 inches.

Each proposal will adhere to the following order and content of sections. Proposal should be straightforward, concise and provide “layman” explanations of technical terms that are used. Emphasis should be concentrated on conforming to the RFP instructions, responding to the RFP requirements, and on providing a complete and clear description of the offer. Proposals, which appear unrealistic in the terms of technical commitments, lack of technical competence or are indicative of failure to comprehend the complexity and risk of this contract, may be rejected. The following proposal sections are to be included in the Vendor’s response:
1212

A. Consultant Cover Letter
A cover letter, not to exceed two pages in length, should summarize key elements of the proposal and shall:
• Confirm that all elements of this RFP have been reviewed and understood; • Include a statement of intent to perform the services as outlined; • Express company’s willingness to enter into an agreement under the terms and conditions prescribed by this RFP, and insurance requirements • Include a description and brief history of the company’s experiences, qualifications, and successes in providing Engineering & Design services described herein. Please indicate the number of employees, client base and location of offices.
• Indicate the address and telephone number of the Consultant’s office located nearest to Richmond, California, and the office from which the project will be managed.
• Confirm that Consultant has a minimum of three (3) years Engineering and Design experience.
• Stipulate that the proposal price will be valid for a period of at least 180 days.
• Identify a single person for contact during the RFP review process; and • Cover letter shall be signed by an authorized official of the company.

B. Background and Project Summary Section
The Background and Project Summary Section should describe the Consultant’s understanding of the City, the work to be done, and the objectives to be accomplished. Refer to description of services for this RFP.

C. Methodology Section
Provide a detailed description of the approach and methodology to be used to accomplish the Scope of Services of this RFP. The Methodology Section should include:
1) An implementation plan that describes in detail (i) the methods, including controls by which your firm manages projects of the type sought by this RFP; (ii) methodology for soliciting and documenting views of internal and external stakeholders; (iii) and any other project management or implementation strategies or techniques that the respondent intends to employ in carrying out the work.
2) Detailed description of efforts your firm will undertake to achieve client satisfaction and to satisfy the requirements of the "Scope of Services" section.
3) Detailed project schedule, identifying all tasks and deliverables to be performed, durations for each task, and overall time of completion. 4) Detailed description of specific tasks you will require from City staff.

Explain what the respective roles of City staff and your staff would be to complete the tasks specified in the Scope of Services.
1213

D. Staffing
Describe proposed Project team organization, including identification and responsibilities of key personnel. Indicate role and responsibility of prime consultants and all sub-consultants. If applicable, indicate how local firms are being utilized to ensure a strong understanding of state and local laws, ordinances, regulations, policies, requirements, and permitting. Indicate the extent of the commitment of key personnel for the duration of the Project and furnish resumes of key personnel. Provide an indication of the staffing level for the Project. The City of Richmond’s evaluation of the proposal will consider the proposer’s entire team; therefore, no changes in the team composition will be allowed without prior written approval of the City of Richmond. Sub-consultant letters of commitment are required and must be submitted with the proposal.

Describe the experience of the proposer’s Project team in detail, including the team’s Project Manager, and other key staff members, on projects of similar size, capacity, and dollar value. For each similar project, include the client’s name and correct telephone number. It is the City of Richmond’s policy to interview proposers’ references as well as references identified by the City of Richmond.

E. Qualifications
The information requested in this section should describe the qualifications of the firm, key staff and sub‐contractors performing projects within the past five years that are similar in size and scope to demonstrate competence to perform these services. Information shall include:
1) Names of key staff that participated on named projects and their specific responsibilities with respect to this scope of service. 2) A summary of your firm’s demonstrated capability, including length of time that your firm has provided the services being requested in this Request for Proposal.
3) Provide at least three (3) references that received similar services from your firm. The City of Richmond reserves the right to contact any of the organizations or individuals listed. Information provided shall include:
a) Client Name and contact info
• Telephone & e-mail address
• Address
b) Description of services provided including contract amount c) Project start and end dates
F. Cost Information
Provide the total direct and indirect costs to complete all tasks identified in the scope of services. Even if the method of payment to proposer will be fixed fee, a detailed cost breakdown shall be provided identifying: (1) the number of staff hours and hourly rates for each professional and administrative staff person who will be committed to this Project; (2) all other direct costs, such as materials and reproduction costs; and (3) sub-consultant services, if needed. These rates will also be used to negotiate rates for other projects (including optional tasks) 1214

that may be assigned. No additional funds will be paid above and beyond the original quote given by the selected Vendor.

Proposers will be paid at the same rates set forth in their cost proposal unless further negotiated in writing and agreed to by the City of Richmond.

G. Value Added Services
Please provide any additional services of benefit not specifically required herein, which the Proposer offers to provide.

H. Contractor Assignment of Sub-Contract
The resulting contract shall not be assigned, transferred, or sublet, in whole or in part, without the prior written approval of the City of Richmond. If Proposers intend to subcontract any portion of the resulting contract, they must describe their process for selecting such subcontractor(s) and the quality control measures that the Proposer will employ to ensure that any subcontractor complies with the provisions of Proposer’s contract with the City.

I. Previous Contracts with the City of Richmond
The proposer shall submit a list which indicates all prime contracts and/or amendments awarded to the Proposer by the City of Richmond for the last three (3) years. The list shall include a short description of the Project, the Project scope of work, award date, completion date, name of City of Richmond’s assigned Project Manager, and contract value.

J. Exceptions to this Request for Proposals
The proposer shall state whether it takes exception(s) to this RFP, including but not limited to the City of Richmond’s Standard Services Agreement – RFP (Attachment A). If the proposer does take exception(s) to any portion of the RFP or contract, the specific portion to which exception(s) is taken must be identified by section number and explained. Requests for changes or additions to sections of City of Richmond’s Standard Services Agreement must be shown by requesting deletion of specific words and/or by providing new requested contract language. Requests for complete replacement of the City of Richmond’s Standard Services Agreement for another contract will not be granted. Failure to make exceptions to the RFP or Standard Services Agreement within the proposal will be deemed a waiver of any objection.

Exceptions will be considered during the proposal evaluation process.

K. Statement of Impartiality and Disclosure
The nature of this Project requires an impartial unbiased approach on the part of the proposer’s team. This proposal shall include a statement declaring that the proposer’s and sub-consultants are not currently, and will not, during the performance of these services, participate in any other similar work involving a third-party with interests currently in conflict or likely to be in conflict with City of Richmond’s interests. Additionally, proposer is required to disclose any pending or active investigations or litigation that may affect the reputation or ability of the proposer to carry out the Project.
1215

4. PROCESS FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSALS
Questions Concerning Request for Proposals
All questions must be submitted via the electronic BidsOnline system on the Q&A tab by 5:00pm PST, on May 9, 2025. If the City finds it necessary to issue an addendum, prospective Offerors will receive e-mail notification of addendum.

Otherwise, answers to questions received will be provided on the Q&A tab and notification will be sent by May 15, 2025. It is the proposer’s responsibility to periodically check the BidsOnline website www.ci.richmond.ca.us/bids for any possible Addenda to the RFP that may have been posted.

Any party submitting a proposal shall not contact or lobby any City Council member, City official, employee (except those specified for contact) or agent regarding the RFP. Any party attempting to influence or circumvent the RFP, bid submittal, and review process may have their proposal rejected for violating this provision of the RFP.

Interested parties may download copies of the above-mentioned proposal by visiting the City's web site, www.ci.richmond.ca.us/bids. To download RFP, new vendors will be required to register. Once the vendor downloads any documents relative to a solicitation, that vendor's name will appear on the Prospective Bidders list for that project and will receive any addenda or notifications relating to the RFP.

Submission of Proposals
The proposal and any required certifications shall be signed by an individual or individuals authorized to execute legal documents on behalf of the proposer.

Electronic Proposals shall be submitted via the City’s secure online bidding system.

All required sections of the proposal must be submitted via the website. Contractor is solely responsible for “on time” submission of their electronic proposal. The Bid Management System will not accept late proposals and no exceptions shall be made. Contractors will receive an e-bid confirmation number with a time stamp from the Bid Management System indicating that their bid was submitted successfully.

The City will only receive those proposals that were transmitted successfully.

The proposal must be received no later than 12:00 p.m., local time, on May 22, 2025.

The City of Richmond reserves the right to waive inconsequential irregularities.

GENERAL GUIDELINES
This RFP does not commit the City of Richmond to award a contract, to defray any costs incurred in the preparation of a proposal pursuant to this RFP, or to procure or contract for work. The City of Richmond may reject a proposal without providing the reason(s) underlying the declination. A failure to award a contract to the proposer with the lowest cost proposal shall not constitute a valid cause of action against the City of Richmond. The City shall not be responsible for work done, even in good 1216

faith, prior to final approval of the proposed contract. The City may investigate the qualifications of any respondent under consideration, require confirmation of information furnished by the respondent, and require additional evidence or qualifications to perform the Services described in this RFP.

The City reserves the right to:

1. Reject any or all proposals.

2. Issue subsequent Requests for Proposal.

3. Postpone opening for its own convenience.

4. Remedy technical errors in the Request for Proposal process.

5. Negotiate with any, all, or none of the Respondents.

6. Solicit best and final offers from all or some of the Respondents.

7. Select one or more Respondents.

8. Accept other than the lowest proposed fees.

9. Waive informalities and irregularities in proposals.

Public Records
All proposals submitted in response to this RFP will become the property of the City of Richmond and public records and, as such, may be subject to public review.

Documents protected by law from public disclosure will not be disclosed by the City of Richmond if clearly marked with the word "confidential" on each applicable page.

Trade secrets may be marked as confidential only to the extent they meet the requirements of California Government Code section 6254.7. Only information claimed to be a trade secret at the time of submittal to the City of Richmond and marked as "confidential" will be treated as a trade secret.

Insurance Requirements
The City of Richmond requires consultants doing business with it to obtain insurance, as shown in RFP Attachment B. The required insurance certificates must comply with all requirements of the standards as shown and must be provided within fifteen (15) days of issuance of the Notice of Intent to Award and prior to the commencement of any work on the Project.

Business Licenses
The successful Contractor and all subcontractors used in the work will be required to hold or to obtain a City of Richmond business license for which the fee will not be waived.

Compliance with City Ordinances
The Contractor and all subcontractors shall comply with the City of Richmond Nondiscrimination Clauses in City Contracts Ordinance (Richmond Municipal Code (RMC) Chapter 2.28), Business Opportunity Ordinance, Local Employment Program Ordinance, Living Wage Ordinance and Ordinance Banning the Requirement to Provide Information of Prior Criminal Convictions on all Employment Applications (“Ban the Box”), which are incorporated into the Contract Documents by this reference.
1217

Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance (SCCO)
The Richmond Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance No. 12-18 prohibits the City from granting and or retaining contracts with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”).

Proposers must submit the attached Sanctuary City Compliance Statement with their Proposal.

Limited Liability Company Disclosure Statement (LLCS)
Resolution No. 86-21, approved by City Council on July 6, 2021, requires disclosure of the identities of beneficial & responsible owners of Limited Liability Corporations (LLC). Proposers must submit the attached Disclosure Statement of Limited Liability Companies Form with their Proposal
Collusion
By submitting a proposal, each respondent represents and warrants that its proposal is genuine and not false or collusive or made in the interest of, or on behalf of any person not named therein; that the respondent has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other person to submit a false proposal, or any other person to refrain from submitting a proposal; and that the respondent has not, in any manner, sought collusion to secure any improper advantage over any other person submitting a proposal.

Withdrawal of Proposals
A respondent may withdraw their proposal before the expiration of the time for submission of proposals by delivering to the Finance Department a written request for withdrawal signed by, or on behalf of, the respondent.

Ownership of Documents
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems, and any other materials produced for the Project shall be the sole and exclusive property of the City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part for the Project shall be subject to private use, copyrights, or patent rights by Respondent in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of the City. The City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced for this project.

5. PROPOSAL EVALUATION AND SELECTION PROCESS
All proposals shall be reviewed to verify that the Respondent has met the minimum requirements. Proposals that have not complied with requirements, do not meet minimum content and quality standards, or take unacceptable exceptions to the General Terms and Conditions of the Standard Service Agreement, will be eliminated from further consideration. Proposals will be reviewed and evaluated by an evaluation committee comprised of City of Richmond personnel. 1218

The City reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, or to make no award. The City also reserves the right to require modifications follow‐up with requests for additional information, including, but not limited to, follow‐up interviews. The City may request Best and Final offers based upon improved understanding of the offers or changed scope of service. The City will negotiate with that vendor to determine final pricing and contract form. Because this proposal is negotiable, all pricing data will remain confidential until after award is made, and there will be no public opening and reading of Proposals. Overall responsiveness to the RFP is an important factor in the evaluation process. The criteria upon which the evaluation of the proposals will be based include, but are not limited to, the following:

Proposal/Methodology and Approach to Work 25%
Experience/Past Performance/References 25%
Project Team 25%
Proposer Qualifications 25%
Proposal/Methodology and Approach to Work – 25%
The proposer’s responsiveness to the RFP including completeness and thoroughness of proposal; all required information must be provided in the format specified. This category will also evaluate:
• Ability to provide services as outlined in the RFP.
• Approach and proposed methodology to project scope.
• Demonstrated knowledge of the work required.
• Explanation of the Project or services required.
• Innovative approaches and internal measures for timely completion of Project.

Experience/Past Performance/References – 25%
Consideration will be given based upon the firm’s experience, years in business, past and current client references; technical expertise and professional competence in areas directly related to this RFP; number of years of experience in performing similar work.

Project Team – 25%
Respondent should demonstrate that all key personnel have been successfully involved with projects of similar scope and magnitude. This category will evaluate the firm’s:
• Qualifications and relevant individual experience
• Unique qualification of key personnel
• Staff Availability / Time commitment of key members
• Organization chart
1219

Proposer Qualifications – 25%
This category will evaluate the respondent’s ability to take upon itself the responsibilities set forth in the Scope of Services and produce the required outcome in a timely manner. Consideration will be given for the overall quality of the proposal, including a demonstrated understanding of the purpose, scope and objective of the services to be performed. It is the intention of the City of Richmond to award a contract to the Respondent who furnishes satisfactory evidence that the Respondent has the requisite experience and ability to enable the Respondent to execute the work successfully and properly, and to complete services in a timely manner. To determine the degree of responsibility to be credited to the Respondent, the City of Richmond will weigh the evidence that the Respondent has performed satisfactorily other contracts of like nature, magnitude and comparable difficulty and comparable rates of progress.

Pre-Award Negotiations
After the proposals are opened, but prior to award, the City may elect to conduct negotiations with the highest ranked respondent for purposes of:
• Resolving minor differences and information
• Clarifying necessary details and responsibilities
• Emphasizing important issues and points
• Receiving assurances from respondents
• Cost/budget clarifications
If the City cannot successfully negotiate a contract with the highest ranked respondent, the City may begin negotiations with the second highest ranked respondent.

Selection may be made without further discussion, negotiations or presentations; therefore, respondents shall offer the most favorable terms in response to this RFP.

Respondent must demonstrate an understanding of the scope of service to be provided and the ability to accomplish the tasks set forth. Respondent shall include information that will enable the City to determine the Respondent’s overall qualifications. The City reserves the right to request additional information or clarification on any matter included in the proposal response, to enable the City to arrive at the final award decision.

Award - When the evaluation committee has completed its work, City staff will then make a recommendation to City Council to award a contract for Engineering & Design Services for the Downtown Point Richmond Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Project. The services provided by the successful Proposer shall be governed by a Standard Services Agreement (Attachment A).

Exhibits and Attachments
• Exhibit 1: Parchester Village Infrastructure Study Area Map • Exhibit 2: Presentation from Richmond City Council Study Session • Attachment A: City of Richmond Standard Services Agreement 1220

• Attachment B: City of Richmond Insurance Requirements • Attachment C: Sanctuary City Compliance Statement
• Attachment D: Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance 12-18 • Attachment E: Approved Resolution 86-21-LLC Compliance • Attachment F: Disclosure Statement for LLC
1221

August 26, 2025
DocID #36035v1
Public Works
DATE: August 26, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, PE, Director of Public Works
Robert Armijo, PE, Deputy Director of Public Works / City Engineer
Dan Santos, Assistant Engineer
Subject: Adopt a Resolution Approving a Construction Agreement with A. Teichert & Son Inc. for the 2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The proposed $5,083,970.10 expenditure is included within the approved fiscal year 2025-2026 budget (the
construction agreement award is $4,621,791.00 and a 10
percent contingency amount up to $462,179.10).

Funding for this project is available from the California Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) Fund, State Gas Tax Fund, Measure J
Fund and General Capital Fund for a total project budget of $7,557,249. The City also secured a $182,000
Rubberized Pavement Grant from CalRecycle to partially
offset eligible project costs.

Account Strings: 10234431-400645-23077, 11931031-
400645-23077, 20136031-400645-23077, 20236031-
400645-23077 and 10636031-400645-23077

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

N/A
AGENDA
REPORT
1222

August 26, 2025
DocID #36035v1

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The City of Richmond is responsible for maintaining
public infrastructure in a manner that ensures safety,
accessibility, and long-term serviceability. Preventive maintenance, including rubberized cape sealing, is a
cost-effective strategy that extends pavement life,
improves ride quality, and reduces future rehabilitation costs. To implement this year’s pavement preservation
strategy, the City must award a construction contract for the 2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution approving a construction agreement with A. Teichert & Son Inc. for the 2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal in an amount not to exceed
$4,621,791; and AUTHORIZE the director of public works
to approve change orders, if necessary, for a contingency amount up to $462,179.10, for a total construction phase cost not to exceed $5,083,970.10 – Public Works
Department (Dan Santos 510-620-6645/Robert Armijo
510-620-5477).

DISCUSSION:

The 2025 Cape Seal Pavement Preservation Project is part of the City of Richmond’s ongoing effort to preserve and extend the life of its roadway network through preventive maintenance. The scope of work includes asphalt rubber chip sealing, slurry sealing, crack sealing, and the reapplication of pavement striping and markings on various residential and arterial streets throughout the City. This project also includes necessary concrete and utility adjustments to ensure Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance and surface uniformity. These improvements support the City’s Pavement Management Program objectives and contribute to long-term PCI improvements across targeted corridors. Road segments identified for treatment are distributed city-wide and include locations in the Hilltop, Iron Triangle, Marina Bay, and East Richmond neighborhoods.

To fund the project, the City is utilizing revenue from the state’s Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA) program. This is a restricteduse fund specifically designated for transportation infrastructure improvements. In addition, the project is supported by a $182,000 Rubberized Pavement Grant from CalRecycle, awarded in April 2025.
1223

August 26, 2025
DocID #36035v1
On June 16, 2025, the City publicly advertised the construction contract through BidsOnline, its procurement portal. On July 15, 2025, the City received three (3) bids.

Below is the final canvass of bids in order of increasing bid amount:

Lowest Bidders Contractor Bid ($)
1 Gloria Washington Trucking $120,000.00
2 A Teichert & Son Inc. $4,621,791.00
3 Pavement Coatings Co. $5,457,357.79
City staff reviewed the bid submitted by Gloria Washington Trucking. Upon evaluation, it was determined that the proposal did not meet the minimum requirements outlined in the bid documents. Specifically, the bid indicated the firm intended to provide only trucking support as a subcontractor and not perform the full scope of construction work required under the contract. As a result, the bid was disqualified from further consideration.

A. Teichert & Son Inc. was the next lowest, responsive and responsible bidder. The contractor met all project specifications and demonstrated the necessary qualifications, experience, and capacity to execute the required work. A. Teichert & Son Inc. is currently registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations and holds a valid license with the Contractors State License Board.

Following a comprehensive review and evaluation of all bid submissions, City staff recommends that the City Council approve a resolution to award a construction agreement to A. Teichert & Son Inc. in an amount not to exceed $4,621,791.00. City staff further recommends authorizing the Director of Public Works to approve contract change orders, if necessary, for a contingency amount up to $462,179.10 (10%), bringing the total not-to-exceed construction phase cost to $5,083,970.10.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Proposed Construction Agreement
Attachment 3 – 2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal Locations Attachment 4 – Bid Summary
Attachment 5 – Bid Tabulation
Attachment 6 – Grant Award Notice to Proceed
Attachment 7 – Bid Disqualification Letter – Gloria Washington Trucking, Inc. 1224
Reso. No. xx-25

DocID #51078v1DocID #51078v1
Formatte
RESOLUTION NO. xx-25

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT WITH A.

TEICHERT & SON INC. FOR THE 2025 PAVING PROJECT – RUBBERIZED CAPE SEAL
WHEREAS, the 2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal is located at various locations in Richmond; and
WHEREAS, this project is part of the City’s pavement preservation strategy and includes asphalt rubber chip sealing, slurry sealing, crack sealing, and the reapplication of pavement striping and markings; and
WHEREAS, the project is funded by the state through Senate Bill 1 (SB1) Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account program; and
WHEREAS, an invitation for bids was duly advertised on June 16, 2025, which were opened on July 15, 2025; and
WHEREAS, the City received three (3) bid submissions, with the following results:

Lowest Bidders Contractor Bid ($)
1 Gloria Washington Trucking $120,000.00
2 A Teichert & Son Inc. $4,621,791.00
3 Pavement Coatings Co. $5,457,357.79
WHEREAS, upon review of the bids, it was determined A. Teichert & Son, Inc., submitted a complete and compliant bid and was found to be the lowest responsive and responsible bidder for the project; and
WHEREAS, following a comprehensive review and analysis of all submissions, A.

Teichert & Son Inc. was deemed the best fit for the project.

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Richmond, as follows:

Section 1: The foregoing recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2: The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or their designee, to execute a construction agreement with A. Teichert & Son Inc. for the 2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, in an amount not to exceed $4,621,791.00.

Section 3: The City Council hereby authorizes the Director of Public Works to approve change orders, if necessary, in a contingency amount of up to $462,179.10 (10%), for a total construction phase cost not to exceed $5,083,970.10.

Section 4: This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. **********************
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution of the City Council of the City of Richmond was duly passed and adopted at a meeting thereof held August 26, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:
1225
Reso. No. xx-25

DocID #51078v1DocID #51078v1
Formatte
ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney
1226
1 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT
This Construction Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this 28th day of August , 2025, by and between the City of Richmond, a municipal corporation and charter city (“City”) and A. Teichert & Son Inc. (“Contractor”), with reference to the following facts. The parties may be referred to in this Agreement individually as “Party” and collectively as the “Parties.”

RECITALS
A. On June 16, 2025, the City circulated an Invitation for Bids seeking contractors willing to undertake the construction of the 2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, located at various locations throughout the City (the “Project”).

B. Contractor submitted the lowest responsive bid and has been determined to be responsible.

C. City now desires to contract with Contractor to furnish construction and related services for the Project.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and agreements hereinafter set forth, and intending to be bound hereby, the Parties agree as follows:

ARTICLE I

CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT
Section 1.1 Contract Documents.

Project Specifications – including the Notice to Prospective Bidders, Invitation for Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Special Provisions, Description of Work, Construction Details (including all plans and specifications), and Proposal Package, along with any Requests for Information (RFI), responses to RFI, and addenda issued prior to the deadline for submitting bids [THIS

LIST MAY BE MODIFIED TO PROVIDE A MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DOCUMENTS FOR YOUR PROJECT – FOR EXAMPLE, YOU MAY SPECIFY THE NUMBER OF RFI/RESPONSES TO RFI THAT RE INCLUDED] – Contractor’s Proposal attached as Exhibit A, and this Agreement, constitute the “Contract Documents.” Section 1.2 Construction.

Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, methods, processes, implements, tools and machinery, within the time frames set, and do all the things necessary for the proper completion of the work shown and described in Contract Documents.
1227
2 Section 1.3 Payments.

Contractor agrees to receive and accept the sums set forth in the Bid Schedule attached as part of the Proposal, as full compensation for furnishing all materials and doing all the work contemplated and required by this Agreement, and for all loss or damage arising out of the nature of the undertaking of the construction of the Project, or from the acts of the elements, or from any unforeseen difficulties or obstructions which may arise or be encountered in the prosecution of the construction of the Project until its completion and acceptance by the City, and for all expenses incurred by or in consequence of the suspension or discontinuance of the construction of the Project, and for well and faithfully performing the construction of the Project and the whole thereof, in the manner and according to the Contract Documents.

Section 1.4 Discovery of Hazardous Waste or Unusual Conditions. (a) Promptly and before the following conditions are disturbed, the Contractor shall notify the City in writing of any:
(1) Material that the Contractor believes may be hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code, that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class III disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law.
(2) Subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site differing from those indicated by information about the site made available to bidders prior to the deadline for submitting bids.
(3) Unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in this Agreement. (b) The City shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if it finds that the conditions do materially so differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and cause a decrease or increase in the Contractor's cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work shall issue a Change Order under the procedures described in this Agreement. (c) In the event that a dispute arises between the City and the Contractor whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or increase in the Contractor's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, the Contractor shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date provided for by this Agreement, but shall proceed with all work to be performed under this Agreement. The Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided either by contract or by law which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the Parties.

Section 1.5 Laws and Regulations.
(a) The Project work shall proceed only after procurement of each permit, license, or other authorization that may be required by any governmental agency having jurisdiction, and Contractor shall be responsible to the City for the procurement and maintenance thereof. 1228
3 (b) Contractor shall cause all work performed in connection with construction of the Project to be performed in compliance with (i) all applicable laws, ordinances, rules and regulations now in force or that may be enacted hereafter; (ii) all conditions of Project approval and mitigation measures included in any adopted or certified environmental document prepared for the Project; and (iii) all directions, rules and regulations of any fire marshal, health officer, building inspector, or other officer of every governmental agency now having or hereafter acquiring jurisdiction, provided that such direction given during construction does not conflict with conditions of Project approval or mitigation measures. (c) Contractor shall and shall cause its subcontractors to pay prevailing wages in the construction of the Project as those wages are determined pursuant to Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq., and implementing regulations of the Department of Industrial Relations, and to comply with all other applicable federal, State and local laws, regulations and ordinances pertaining to labor standards insofar as those laws, regulations and ordinances apply to the performance of this Agreement, including any applicable City of Richmond employment requirements, including but not limited to the City's Living Wage Ordinance (Richmond Municipal Code Chapter 2.60), the City's Business Opportunity Ordinance (Richmond Municipal Code Chapter 2.50), and the City's Local Employment Program Ordinance (Richmond Municipal Code Chapter 2.56). During the construction of the Project, Contractor shall post at the construction site the applicable prevailing rates of per diem wages. Contractor shall indemnify, hold harmless and defend, (with counsel reasonably acceptable to the City) the City against any claims for damages, compensation, fines, penalties or other amounts arising out of failure or alleged failure of any person or entity (including Contractor and its subcontractors) to pay prevailing wages in connection with construction of the Project. This Section 1.5(c) shall survive the termination of this Agreement. (d) Contractor and all subcontractors shall maintain accurate payroll records showing the name, address, social security number, work classification, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and week, and the actual per diem wages paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker and others employed on the Project. Each payroll record shall contain or be verified by a written declaration made under penalty of perjury, stating both of the following: (1) the information contained in the payroll record is true and correct, and (2) the employer has complied with the requirements of Labor Code Section 1771 (prevailing wage provisions), Section 1811 (eight-hour day, forty-hour week provisions), and Section 1815 (overtime compensation) for any work performed by his or her employees on the Project. The Contractor shall provide certified payroll records to the City each week, no later than ten (10) days after the end of a weekly pay period. Pay records shall be maintained and made available in accordance with Labor Code Section 1776. In addition, Contractor shall and shall cause its subcontractors promptly to deliver to the City, upon request, documents verifying compliance with the Living Wage Ordinance, which include documents which evidence that each affected employee has been notified regarding the wages required to be paid pursuant to the Living Wage Ordinance.

Such wages shall also be posted at the construction site. This Section 1.5(d) shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
1229
4 Section 1.6 Inspections.

Contractor shall permit and facilitate, and shall require its subcontractors to permit and facilitate, observation and inspection of the Project by the City and by public authorities at all times for the purposes of determining compliance with this Agreement and permits issued to perform the Project work. In so doing, Contractor shall provide access for testing and inspections. Contractor shall coordinate and schedule all testing and inspections required on the Project with the required advance notice as defined in the Project Specifications.

Section 1.7 Equal Opportunity.
(a) During the construction of the Project there shall be no discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, age, sex, sexual orientation, marital status, national origin, ancestry, or disability in the hiring, firing, promoting, or demoting of any person engaged in the construction work.
(b) In addition, Contractor agrees to observe the provisions of Section 2.28.030 of the Richmond Municipal Code, obligating Contractor and its subcontractors to refrain from discriminatory employment or subcontracting practices on the basis of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religion, creed, national origin or ancestry of any employee, any applicant for employment or any potential subcontractor.

Section 1.8 Working Hours.

Eight hours of labor is a legal day’s work. Any worker’s time of service is restricted to eight hours during any calendar day, and 40 hours during a calendar week, unless overtime compensation is paid at not less than one and one-half times the basic rate of pay. The Contractor shall be assessed a penalty of twenty-five dollars ($25) for each day a worker is employed in violation of these requirements.

Section 1.9 Insurance and Bond Requirements.
(a) In accordance with California Labor Code Section 3700, Contractor must secure Workers’ Compensation coverage for its employees. Prior to performing any work, Contractor must execute a certification in the form set out at California Labor Code Section 1861. (b) Contractor shall submit to the City evidence of the insurance and payment and performance bond coverage meeting the requirements set forth in the Project Specifications. Proof of insurance and bonding related to the construction of the Project shall be provided to the City not more than (10) days after award of the contract. The City shall review and approve or disapprove of the evidence of insurance within twenty (20) days after submittal of complete information in the form required by the City. If the City disapproves the evidence of insurance, it shall specify in writing the reasons for such disapproval. Contractor shall resubmit the information required within ten (10) days. The review and submittal periods for resubmittals shall be reduced to a ten (10) day review period for the City and a five (5) day period for resubmittal by Contractor and shall continue to apply until the City approves the evidence of insurance coverage, but in no event shall the 1230
5 submittal and review period continue for more than forty-five (45) days. If, after forty-five (45) days the Contractor has not provided evidence of insurance and bond coverage meeting the requirements of the City, the City shall terminate the contract and may either award the work to the next lowest responsive responsible bidder or issue a new request for bids. (If the City issues a new request for bids, the Contractor shall be disqualified from re-bidding the work because of the failure to provide timely proof of insurance and/or bond coverage.) No work shall be initiated on the Project prior to Contractor's receipt of the City's approval of evidence of insurance coverage related to the construction of the Project.
(c) Contractor shall have furnished the City with evidence of the insurance coverage meeting the insurance requirements set forth in Project Specifications for each subcontractor prior to initiating any work on the Project, including Builder's Risk insurance with appropriate coverage for the cost of construction. The periods for submittal, review and approval shall apply as stated in subparagraph (b) above.
(d) The Parties agree that notwithstanding the time requirements set forth in this subsection for submittal and resubmittal to the City by the Contractor of the evidence of insurance and review and approval of the evidence of insurance by the City, Contractor is responsible for ensuring that the evidence of insurance in approvable form is submitted to the City in a timely manner.

Section 1.10 Security In Lieu of Retention.
(a) The City shall retain five percent (5%) of the sum requested in each progress payment unless the Contractor elects to invoke the procedures set forth at California Public Contract Code 22300 to substitute securities to ensure performance under the contract.

1. At the request and the expense of the Contractor, securities equivalent to the amount withheld shall be deposited with the City, or with a state or federally chartered bank in the state as escrow agent, who shall then pay the retained funds to the Contractor. Upon satisfactory completion of the contract, the securities shall be returned to the Contractor.

2. Alternatively, the Contractor may request and the City shall make payment of retentions earned directly to the escrow agent at the expense of the Contractor. At the expense of the Contractor, the Contractor may direct the investment of the payments into securities and the Contractor shall receive the interest earned on the investments upon the same terms provided for in Public Contract Code 22300 for securities deposited by the Contractor. Upon satisfactory completion of this Agreement, the Contractor shall receive from the escrow agent all securities, interest, and payments received by the escrow agent from the owner, pursuant to the terms of this section.
(b) If the Contractor chooses to place securities in escrow, the escrow agreement to be used shall be substantially similar to the following form:
1231
6 ESCROW AGREEMENT FOR SECURITY DEPOSITS IN LIEU OF RETENTION This Escrow Agreement is made and entered into by and between _________________________________________________ whose address is ________________________________ hereinafter called "Owner," ___________ whose address is ________________________________ hereinafter called "Contractor" and ___________ whose address is ________________________________ hereinafter called "Escrow Agent."
For the consideration hereinafter set forth, the Owner, Contractor, and Escrow Agent agree as follows:
(1) Pursuant to Section 22300 of the Public Contract Code of the State of California, Contractor has the option to deposit securities with Escrow Agent as a substitute for retention earnings required to be withheld by Owner pursuant to the Construction Contract entered into between the Owner and Contractor for ____ in the amount of ____ dated ____ (hereinafter referred to as the "Contract"). Alternatively, on written request of the Contractor, the Owner shall make payments of the retention earnings directly to the Escrow Agent. When the Contractor deposits the securities as a substitute for Contract earnings, the Escrow Agent shall notify the Owner within 10 days of the deposit. The market value of the securities at the time of the substitution shall be at least equal to the cash amount then required to be withheld as retention under the terms of the Contract between the Owner and Contractor. Securities shall be held in the name of ____, and shall designate the Contractor as the beneficial owner. (2) The Owner shall make progress payments to the Contractor for those funds which otherwise would be withheld from progress payments pursuant to the Contract provisions, provided that the Escrow Agent holds securities in the form and amount specified above. (3) When the Owner makes payment of retentions earned directly to the Escrow Agent, the Escrow Agent shall hold them for the benefit of the Contractor until the time that the escrow created under this contract is terminated. The Contractor may direct the investment of the payments into securities. All terms and conditions of this agreement and the rights and responsibilities of the parties shall be equally applicable and binding when the Owner pays the Escrow Agent directly.
(4) Contractor shall be responsible for paying all fees for the expenses incurred by Escrow Agent in administering the Escrow Account and all expenses of the Owner. These expenses and payment terms shall be determined by the Owner, Contractor, and Escrow Agent. (5) The interest earned on the securities or the money market accounts held in escrow and all interest earned on that interest shall be for the sole account of Contractor and shall be subject to withdrawal by Contractor at any time and from time to time without notice to the Owner. (6) Contractor shall have the right to withdraw all or any part of the principal in the Escrow Account only by written notice to Escrow Agent accompanied by written authorization from the Owner to the Escrow Agent that Owner consents to the withdrawal of the amount sought to be withdrawn by Contractor.
(7) The Owner shall have a right to draw upon the securities in the event of default by the Contractor. Upon seven days' written notice to the Escrow Agent from the Owner of the default, the Escrow Agent shall immediately convert the securities to cash and shall distribute the cash as instructed by the Owner.
(8) Upon receipt of written notification from the Owner certifying that the Contract is final and complete, and that the Contractor has complied with all requirements and procedures applicable to the Contract, Escrow Agent shall release to Contractor all securities and interest on deposit 1232
7 less escrow fees and charges of the Escrow Account. The escrow shall be closed immediately upon disbursement of all moneys and securities on deposit and payments of fees and charges. (9) Escrow Agent shall rely on the written notifications from the Owner and the Contractor pursuant to Sections (5) to (8), inclusive, of this Agreement and the Owner and Contractor shall hold Escrow Agent harmless from Escrow Agent's release and disbursement of the securities and interest as set forth above.
(10) The names of the persons who are authorized to give written notice or to receive written notice on behalf of the Owner and on behalf of Contractor in connection with the foregoing, and exemplars of their respective signatures are as follows:

On behalf of Owner: On behalf of Contractor:
_______________________ _________________________
Title Title
_______________________ _________________________
Name Name
_____________________ _________________________
Signature Signature
_______________________ _________________________
Address Address
On behalf of Escrow Agent:
_______________________
Title
_______________________
Name
_______________________
Signature
_______________________
Address
At the time the Escrow Account is opened, the Owner and Contractor shall deliver to the Escrow Agent a fully executed counterpart of this Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement by their proper officers on the date first set forth above.

Owner Contractor
________________________ _________________________
Title Title
________________________ _________________________
Name Name
________________________ _________________________
Signature Signature
1233
8 ARTICLE II

DEFAULT AND REMEDIES

2.1 Events of Default.

In addition the remedies set forth in Section 2.2, below, in the event of default the Department Head reserves the right to stop work immediately if any action or inaction by the Contractor or any subcontractor creates a risk of imminent harm to the public or property.

Each of the following shall constitute a "Default" by Contractor under this Agreement:
(a) Breach of Covenants. Failure by Contractor or any subcontractor to duly perform, comply with, or observe any of the conditions, terms, or covenants of any of the Contract Documents. The City shall give Contractor written notice of the breach and specify a time in which to cure the breach. If the Contractor cures the breach within the time specified in the notice or, if the breach cannot be cured in the time specified but the Contractor has diligently pursued measures to cure the breach and to keep the City informed of its progress, then the breach shall not constitute a default provided that the breach is cured within thirty (30) days from the date of the City’s last notice and demand to cure.
(b) Disregard of Laws. Disregard of laws, rules, regulations, directions or instructions of City by Contractor or any subcontractor with respect to the performance of work. (c) Insolvency. A court having jurisdiction shall have made or entered any decree or order (i) adjudging Contractor to be bankrupt or insolvent, (ii) approving as properly filed a petition seeking reorganization of Contractor or seeking any arrangement for Contractor under the bankruptcy law or any other applicable debtor's relief law or statute of the United States or any state or other jurisdiction, (iii) appointing a receiver, trustee, liquidator, or assignee of Contractor in bankruptcy or insolvency or for any of their properties, (iv) directing the winding up or liquidation of Contractor if any such decree or order described in clauses (i) to (iv), inclusive, shall have continued unstayed or undischarged for a period of ninety (90) days; or (v) Contractor shall have admitted in writing its inability to pay its debts as they fall due or shall have voluntarily submitted to or filed a petition seeking any decree or order of the nature described in clauses (i) to (iv), inclusive.
(d) Suspension; Termination. Contractor shall have voluntarily suspended its business, or shall have voluntarily or involuntarily lost or terminated one or more of the licenses required to perform the work.
(e) Liens on Property and the Development. There shall be filed any claim of lien (other than liens approved in writing by the City) against the Project or the construction site or any part thereof, or any interest or right made appurtenant thereto and the continued maintenance of said claim of lien for a period of twenty (20) days without discharge or satisfaction thereof or provision therefore (including, without limitation, the posting of bonds) satisfactory to the City. 1234
9 2.2 Remedies.

The occurrence of any Default hereunder following the expiration of all applicable notice and cure periods will, either at the option of the City or automatically where so specified, relieve the City of any obligation to make or continue payments and shall give the City the right to proceed with any and all remedies set forth in the Contract Documents, including but not limited to the following:
(a) Specific Performance. The City shall have the right to mandamus or other suit, action or proceeding at law or in equity to require Contractor to perform its obligations and covenants under this Agreement or to enjoin acts on things which may be unlawful or in violation of the provisions of this Agreement.
(b) Right of Contest. Contractor shall have the right to contest in good faith any claim, demand, levy, or assessment the assertion of which would constitute a Default hereunder.

Any such contest shall be prosecuted diligently and in a manner unprejudicial to the City or the rights of the City hereunder.
(c) Remedies Cumulative. No right, power, or remedy given to the City by the terms of the Contract Documents is intended to be exclusive of any other right, power, or remedy; and each and every such right, power, or remedy shall be cumulative and in addition to every other right, power, or remedy given to the City by the terms of any such instrument, or by any statute or otherwise against Contractor and any other person. Neither the failure nor any delay on the part of the City to exercise any such rights and remedies shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise by the City of any such right or remedy preclude any other or further exercise of such right or remedy, or any other right or remedy.

2.3 Waiver of Damages.

Contractor, in having tendered the Proposal, shall be deemed to have waived any and all claims for damages because of termination of this Agreement for any reason. Contractor shall not be entitled to any lost profit in the event of termination.

ARTICLE III

GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 3.1 Relationship of Parties.

Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be interpreted or understood by any of the Parties, or by any third persons, as creating the relationship of employer and employee, principal and agent, limited or general partnership, or joint venture between the City and Contractor or its agents, employees or subcontractors, and Contractor shall at all times be deemed an independent contractor and shall be wholly responsible for the manner in which it or its agents, or both, perform the services required of it by the terms of this Agreement. Contractor has and retains the right to exercise full control of employment, direction, compensation, and discharge of all 1235
10 persons assisting in the performance of services under the Agreement. In regards to the construction of the Project, Contractor shall be solely responsible for all matters relating to payment of its employees, including compliance with Social Security, withholding, and all other laws and regulations governing such matters, and shall include requirements in each contract that subcontractors shall be solely responsible for similar matters relating to their employees.

Contractor shall be solely responsible for its own acts and those of its agents and employees.

Section 3.2 Change Orders.
(a) Changes affecting the time of performance, unit pricing, or total contract price shall be set forth in a written Change Order that shall specify:

1. The work performed in connection with the change to be made;

2. The amount of the adjustment to the Payment Limit, if any, and the basis for compensation for the work ordered; which adjustment may be a negotiated lump sum amount, agreed unit price, or paid under Section 9-1.04 “Force Account” of the 2010 State of California Department of Transportation Standard Specifications; and

3. The amount of time to be adjusted in the schedule for performance, if any. (b) A Change Order will become effective when signed by the Department Head, or his or her representative, notwithstanding that Contractor has not signed it. A Change Order will become effective without Contractor’s signature, provided the Department Head or his or her representative so indicates by noting thereon “unilateral change order.” (c) All changes in any plans and specification approved by any authority with jurisdiction over the Project may also require addenda or change orders approved by that authority.
(d) Where the City requests, a performance bond rider covering the changed work must be executed and delivered to the City before proceeding with the changed work, or shortly in time thereafter.
(e) The Department Head or his or her representative has the authority to approve Change Orders with a cumulative dollar value of up to ten percent (10%) of the contract price.

Section 3.3 Claims By Contractor.
(a) No Third-Party Claims. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall create or justify any claim against the City by any person that Contractor may have employed or with whom Contractor may have contracted relative to the purchase of materials, supplies or equipment, or the furnishing or the performance of any work or services with respect to the construction of the Project, and Contractor shall include similar requirements in any contracts entered into for the construction of the Project.
(b) Obligation to File Claims for Disputed Work. Should it appear to the Contractor that the work to be performed or any of the matters relative to the Contract 1236
11 Documents are not satisfactorily detailed or explained therein, or should any questions arise as to the meaning or intent of the Contract Documents, or should any dispute arise regarding the true value of any work performed, work omitted, extra work that the Contractor may be required to perform, time extensions, payment to the Contractor during performance of the work, construction of the Project, and/or compliance with procedures or standards set forth in the Contract Documents, or should Contractor otherwise seek extra time or compensation FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER, then Contractor shall first follow the procedures set forth in this Agreement, including but not limited to Section 3.2, “Change Orders.” If a dispute remains, then Contractor shall give written notice to the City that expressly invokes this Section 3.3 and requests a determination of the issue. City shall decide the issue in writing within 15 days; City’s decision shall be final and the limitations period for the filing of a claim shall commence upon the City’s issuance of its decision. If Contractor disagrees with City’s decision, or if Contractor contends that City failed to provide a timely decision, then Contractor’s SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE REMEDY is to file a written claim setting forth Contractor’s position as required herein.
(c) Form and Contents of Claim. The Claim shall be submitted to the City within thirty (30) days of receiving the City’s written decision regarding the dispute, or the date the Contractor contends such decision was due, and in no event later than the date of final payment.

Contractor’s written claim must identify itself as a “Claim” under this Section 3.3 and must include the following: (1) a narrative of pertinent events; (2) citation to contract provisions; (3) theory of entitlement; (4) complete pricing of all cost impacts; (5) a time impact analysis of all time delays that shows actual time impact on the critical path; (6) documentation supporting items 1 – 5; and (7) verification under penalty of perjury of the claim’s accuracy. The Claim shall be priced like a Change Order, and must be updated every thirty (30) days as to cost and entitlement if it remains a continuing Claim. Routine contract materials, for example, correspondence, RFI, Change Order requests, or payment requests shall not constitute a Claim.

Contractor shall bear all costs incurred in preparation, submittal, and administration of a Claim. (d) Administration After Claim Submittal.

1. City may render a final decision based solely on the materials submitted in support of the Claim or may in its sole discretion conduct an administrative hearing on the Claim, in which case Contractor shall appear, participate, answer inquiries, and present any further evidence or analysis requested by City. Should City take no action on the Claim within forty-five (45) days (if the Claim is for less than $50,000) or within sixty (60) days (if the Claim is for $50,000 or more) of submittal, it shall be deemed denied.

2. Notwithstanding and pending the resolution of any Claim or dispute, Contractor shall diligently perform the disputed work to final completion in accordance with the City’s direction.

3. After their submittal, claims less than $375,000 shall also be subject to Section 20104 of the Local Agency Public Construction Act.
1237
12 (e) Compliance

1. The provisions of this Section 3.3 constitute a non-judicial claim settlement procedure that, pursuant to California Government Code Section 930.2, shall constitute a condition precedent to the submittal of a valid claim under the California Government Code. Any Government Code claims alleging disputed work must affirmatively indicate prior compliance with this Section 3.3. In accordance with Richmond Municipal Code Section 1.10.010(b), all Government Code claims must be presented no later than the 100th day after the earlier of (i) the date the City actively or passively denied the Claim, or (ii) substantial completion or termination of the contract.

2. Failure to submit and administer Claims as required in Section 3.3 shall waive Contractor’s right to compensation for any disputed work not included in a timely Claim. Disputes not raised in a timely protest and timely Claim submitted under this Section 3.3 may not be asserted in any subsequent Government Code claim, administrative hearing, or civil action.

3. City shall not be deemed to waive any provision under this Section 3.3 if, at City’s sole discretion, a Claim is administered in a manner not in accord with this Section 3.3. Waivers or modifications of this Section 3.3 may only be made by signed Change Order approved as to form by legal counsel for both City and Contractor. Oral or implied modifications shall be of no force or effect.

Section 3.4 Indemnification.
(a) To the fullest extent permissible by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless, and require its subcontractors to defend, indemnify and hold harmless, the City, its elected and appointed officials, and all of its employees, volunteers and agents (the "Indemnified Parties"), from all liability, penalties, costs, losses, damages, expenses, causes of action, claims or judgments, including attorney's fees and other defense costs (collectively, "Claims"), resulting from injury to or death sustained by any person (including Contractor’s or any subcontractors' employees), or damage to property of any kind, or any other injury or damage whatsoever, which Claims arise out of or are in any way connected with the construction of the Project, regardless of Contractor's fault or negligence; provided, however, that Contractor's, and Contractor's subcontractors' indemnity obligations hereunder shall not apply to the extent any Claims are caused by the active negligence or willful act or omission of an Indemnified Party. The indemnification obligations of Contractor and its subcontractors shall extend to Claims asserted after termination of this Agreement for whatever reason. (b) In Claims against any person or entity indemnified under Section 3.4(a) above by an employee of Contractor or its subcontractors, anyone directly or indirectly employed by any one of them or anyone for whose acts one of them may be liable, the indemnification obligation under Section 3.4(a) above shall not be limited by a limitation on amount or type of damages, compensation of benefits payable under workers' compensation acts, disability benefit acts or other employee benefit acts.
1238
13 Section 3.5 Non-Liability of City Officials, Employees and Agents.

No member, official, employee or agent of the City shall be personally liable to Contractor in the event of any default or breach by the City or for any amount which may become due to Contractor or its successor or on any obligation under the terms of this Agreement.

Section 3.6 No Third Party Beneficiaries.

There shall be no third party beneficiaries to this Agreement.

Section 3.7 Conflict of Interest.
(a) Except for approved eligible administrative or personnel costs, no person described in Section 3.7(b) below who exercises or has exercised any functions or responsibilities with respect to the activities funded pursuant to this Agreement or who is in a position to participate in a decision-making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities, may obtain a personal or financial interest or benefit from the activity, or have an interest in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect thereto, or the proceeds thereunder, either for themselves or those with whom they have family or business ties, during, or at any time after, such person's tenure. Contractor shall exercise due diligence to ensure that the prohibition in this Section 3.7(a) is followed.
(b) The conflict of interest provisions of Section 3.7(a) above apply to any person who is an employee, agent, consultant, officer, or elected or appointed official of the City of Richmond, and any immediate family member or dependent of such person.

Section 3.8 Notices, Demands and Communications.

If at any time after the execution of this Agreement it shall become necessary or convenient for one of the Parties hereto to serve any notice, demand or communication upon the other Party, such notice, demand or communication shall be in writing and shall be served personally or by depositing the same in the registered United States mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid or delivered by express delivery service, return receipt requested and (1) if intended for the City shall be addressed to:

City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, California 94804
Attention: Dan Santos
1239
14 With copy to:

City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Attention: City Attorney
(2) if intended for Contractor shall be addressed to:

A. Teichert & Son Inc.

P.O. Box 15002
Sacramento, CA 95851
Attn: Jason Theriault
Any notice, demand or communication shall be deemed given, received, made or communicated on the date personal delivery is affected or, if mailed in the manner herein specified, on the delivery date or date delivery is refused by the addressee, as shown on the return receipt. Any Party may change its address at any time by giving written notice of such change at least ten (10) days prior to the date such change is desired to be effective.

Section 3.9 Applicable Law.

This Agreement shall be governed by California law. This Agreement is made in Contra Costa County, California, and any action relating to this Agreement shall be instituted and prosecuted in the courts of Contra Costa County, California.

Section 3.10 Parties Bound.

Except as otherwise limited herein, the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, successors, and assigns. Any reference in this Agreement to a specifically named Party shall be deemed to apply to any successor, heir, administrator, executor, successor, or assign of such Party who has acquired an interest in compliance with the terms of this Agreement or under law. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, administrators, executors, successors in interest, and assigns of each of the Parties.

Section 3.11 Severability.

If any term of this Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of the provisions shall continue in full force and effect unless the rights and obligations of the Parties have been materially altered or abridged by such invalidation, voiding or unenforceability.

Section 3.12 Force Majeure.

Performance by either Party shall not be deemed to be in default when delays in performance are due to war, insurrection, strikes, lock-outs, riots, floods, earthquakes, fires, 1240
15 quarantine restrictions, freight embargoes, or court order, or any other similar causes (other than lack of funds of Contractor) beyond the control or without the fault of the Party claiming an extension of time to perform (“Force-Majeure Delays”). In no event shall any extension of any period of time be deemed to have occurred unless the Party claiming the Force-Majeure Delay gives written notice to the other Party within ten (10) days following the commencement of any such delay, setting forth the facts giving rise to the Force-Majeure Delay request, the expected duration of the delay, and the steps the Party intends to take to minimize the Delay. During the Force-Majeure Delay, the Party whose performance is delayed shall keep the other Party reasonably informed of the situation and the steps taken by such Party to continue performance and minimize delay. After the Force-Majeure Delay is over, the Parties shall in good faith jointly prepare an accurate written record of the circumstances giving rise to delay, specifying the commencement date and duration of the Force-Majeure Delay and the cause thereof, which record shall be signed by each Party to confirm agreement with respect to its content. In no event shall the City be required to agree to cumulative Force-Majeure Delays in excess of sixty (60) days unless the City is the cause of such delay. In the event that the parties cannot agree upon a record of the circumstances giving rise to the Force-Majeure Delay, the procedures set forth in Section 3.3 of this Agreement shall apply.

Section 3.13 Waivers.

Any waiver by the City of any obligation or condition in this Agreement must be in writing. No waiver will be implied from any delay or failure by the City to take action on any breach or default of Contractor or to pursue any remedy allowed under this Agreement or applicable law. Any extension of time granted to Contractor to perform any obligation under this Agreement shall not operate as a waiver or release from any of its obligations under this Agreement. Consent by the City to any act or omission by Contractor shall not be construed to be consent to any other or subsequent act or omission or to waive the requirement for the City's written consent to future waivers.

Section 3.14 Title of Parts and Sections.

Any titles of the sections or subsections of this Agreement are inserted for convenience of reference only and shall be disregarded in interpreting any part of the Agreement's provisions.

Section 3.15 Entire Understanding of the Parties.

The Contract Documents – along with any written change orders and dispute determinations that may be issued by the City in the course of performance – shall constitute the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties with respect to construction of the Project.

The Contract Documents, written change orders (if any), and dispute determinations (if any) are deemed complementary and should be interpreted together.

Section 3.16 Multiple Originals; Counterpart.

This Agreement may be executed in multiple originals, each of which is deemed to be an original, and may be signed in counterparts. A facsimile or electronic signature to this Agreement shall be as valid as an ink signed original.
1241
16 WHEREAS, this Agreement has been entered into by the undersigned as of the date first above written.

Reviewed By:
_______________________
City Attorney
ATTEST:
_______________________________
City Clerk
CITY:

CITY OF RICHMOND, a municipal corporation and
charter city
By: _________________________________
Name: _________________________________
Its: __________________________________
CONTRACTOR:

A. Teichert & Son, Inc.

By: _________________________________
Name: _________________________________
Its: _________________________________
1242
17 Exhibit A
Proposal
1243
18 1244
19 1245
20 1246
21 1247
22 1248
23 1249
24 1250
25 1251
26 1252
27 1253
28 1254
29 1255
30 1256
31 1257
32 1258
33 1259
34 1260
35 1261
36 1262
37 1263
38 1264
39 1265
40 1266
41 1267
42 1268
43 1269
44 1270
45 1271
46 1272
47 1273
48 1274
49 1275
50 1276
51 1277
52 1278
0 DATE: ISSUED
FOR BIDS 05/09/2025
1279
580

WINE STREET CREST AVENUE

MARTINA AVENUE
EDDY STREET GOLDEN GATE AVENUE W. RICHMOND AVENUE

A STREET
5TH STREET COLLINS STREET
S 7TH STREET LIVINGSTON LANE
20TH STREET CUTTING BOULEVARD CHANSLOR AVENUE BISSELL AVENUE OHIO AVENUE VIRGINA AVENUE BARRETT AVENUE CARLSON BLVD TEWKSBURY AVENUE WASHINGTON AVENUE E. RICHMOND AVENUE COTTAGE AVENUE PIEDMONT PLACE MACDONALD AVENUE BARRETT AVENUE NEVIN AVENUE CURRY STREET W BISSEL AVENUE 16TH STREET
18TH STREET CHANSLOR AVENUE 580 S 24TH STREET
MARINA BAY PARKWAY CUTTING BOULEVARD FOOTHILL AVENUE BUTTE STREET VAN FLEET AVENUE CARLSON BOULEVARD SAN MATEO STREET SANTA CLARA STREET 1 DATE: ISSUED FOR BIDS 05/09/2025 1280

CARLSON BLVD
10TH STREET
24TH STREET

CIVIL CENTER STREET
24TH STREET 25TH STREET
28TH STREET
33RD STREET
32ND STREET

DUNN AVENUE
30TH STREET

AMADOR STREET CLINTON AVENUE
25TH STREET
OHIO AVENUE 80
23TH STREET

BARRETT AVENUE
13TH STREET

ROOSEVELT AVENUE

MACDONALD AVENUE

GRANT AVENUE

MCBRYDE AVENUE

ESMOND AVENUE

RHEEM AVENUE

SOLANO AVENUE
18TH STREET

BISSELL AVENUE

BARRETT AVENUE

NEVIN AVENUE

DOWNER AVENUE
25TH STREET

MARKET AVENUE
2 DATE: ISSUED
FOR BIDS 05/09/2025
1281

STEWARTON DRIVE MAY DRIVE MAYWOOD DRIVE MAY DRIVE

MORNINGSIDE DRIVE

PAINTED PONY ROAD NIGHTOWL COURT CLEAR WATER COURT FULL MOON DRIVE HEAVENLY RIDGE LANE HARRISON COURT PONDEROSA COURT VIA GIARAMITA VALLEY VIEW ROAD MEADOWBROOK DRIVE SETTING SUN DRIVE MORNINGSIDE DRIVE FASCINATION CIRCLE SAN PABLO DAM ROAD AMEND ROAD FAIRMEDE DRIVE ALTA MIRA DRIVE HENDERSON DRIVE MOYERS ROAD 80 HILLTOP DRIVE GROOM DRIVE 3 DATE: ISSUED FOR BIDS 05/09/2025 1282

CONTRY VIEW DRIVE

GLENWOOD DRIVE

SADDLEBACK COURT

CHARIOT COURT

VICTORIA

LANE RENO LANE

BUCKBOARD WAY

BUCKBOARD WAY

BUCKBOARD WAY

COACH DRIVE

CONESTOGA WAY CARRIAGE DRIVE

CABRILLO NORTE

CASTRO RANCH ROAD

CASTRO RANCH ROAD

WOODVIEW

DRIVE TRI LANE

SAN PABLO DAM ROAD
4 DATE: ISSUED
FOR BIDS 05/09/2025
1283
5 DATE: ISSUED
FOR BIDS 05/09/2025
1284
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1285
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1286
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1287
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1288
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1289
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1290
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1291
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1292
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1293
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1294
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1295
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1296
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1297
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1298
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1299
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1300
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1301
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1302
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1303
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1304
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1305
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1306
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1307
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1308
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1309
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1310
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1311
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1312
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1313
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1314
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1315
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1316
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1317
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1318
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1319
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1320
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1321
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1322
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1323
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1324
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1325
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1326
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1327
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1328
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1329
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1330
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1331
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1332
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1333
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1334
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1335
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1336
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1337
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1338
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1339
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1340
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1341
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1342
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1343
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1344
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1345
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1346
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1347
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1348
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1349
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1350
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1351
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1352
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1353
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1354
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1355
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1356
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1357
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1358
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1359
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1360
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1361
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1362
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1363
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1364
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1365
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1366
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1367
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1368
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1369
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1370
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1371
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1372
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1373
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1374
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1375
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1376
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1377
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1378
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1379
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1380
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1381
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1382
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1383
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1384
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1385
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1386
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1387
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1388
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1389
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1390
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1391
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1392
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1393
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1394
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1395
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1396
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1397
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1398
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1399
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1400
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1401
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1402
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1403
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1404
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1405
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1406
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1407
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1408
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1409
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1410
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1411
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1412
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1413
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1414
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1415
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1416
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1417
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1418
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1419
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1420
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1421
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1422
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1423
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1424
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1425
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1426
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1427
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1428
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1429
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1430
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1431
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1432
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1433
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1434
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1435
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1436
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1437
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1438
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1439
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1440
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1441
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1442
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1443
City of Richmond
2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal, bidding on 07/15/2025 3:00 PM (PDT)

Printed 06/16/2025
PlanetBids
1444
PROJECT NAME 2025 Paving Project - Rubberized Cape Seal LOCATION Various Locations across Richmond
BID DATE July 15, 2025
PROJECT NO. 23077
REF NO. BID ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT AMOUNT BID UNIT AMOUNT BID UNIT AMOUNT BID 1 1 Mobilization 1 LS $225,000.00 225,000.00 $ $0.00 - $ $200,000.00 200,000.00 $ 2 2 Clearing, Grubbing, and Environmental Protection 1 LS $115,000.00 115,000.00 $ $0.00 - $ $150,000.00 150,000.00 $ 3 3 Traffic Control 1 SF $726,888.20 726,888.20 $ $0.00 - $ $376,500.00 376,500.00 $ 4 4 Construction Area Signs 1 SF $80,000.00 80,000.00 $ $0.00 - $ $30,000.00 30,000.00 $ 5 5 Changeable Message Boards 4 SF $7,000.00 28,000.00 $ $0.00 - $ $6,000.00 24,000.00 $ 6 6 Adjust Water Valve Box to Grade 70 SF $800.00 56,000.00 $ $0.00 - $ $1,000.00 70,000.00 $ 7 7 Adjust Survey Monument Box to Grade 30 EA $800.00 24,000.00 $ $0.00 - $ $1,000.00 30,000.00 $ 88 Adjust Storm Drain Manhole Frame and Cover to Grade 2 EA $1,000.00 2,000.00 $ $0.00 - $ $1,100.00 2,200.00 $ 99 Adjust Sanitary Sewer Manhole Frame and Cover to Grade 13 EA $1,000.00 13,000.00 $ $0.00 - $ $1,100.00 14,300.00 $ 10 10 Adjust Unknown Manhole Frame and Cover to Grade 11 EA $1,100.00 12,100.00 $ $0.00 - $ $1,100.00 12,100.00 $ 11 11 Full Depth Base Repair (6-inch Depth) 152909 EA $8.00 1,223,272.00 $ $0.00 - $ $13.25 2,026,044.25 $ 12 12 Base Repair Over-excavation (Revocable Bid Item) 283 SF $260.00 73,580.00 $ $0.00 - $ $126.00 35,658.00 $ 13 13 Crack Sealing 1 LF $125,000.00 125,000.00 $ $0.00 - $ $130,500.00 130,500.00 $ 14 14 Rubberized Chip Seal 201442 SF $5.75 1,158,291.50 $ $0.00 - $ $5.50 1,107,931.00 $ 15 15 Polymer Modified Type II Slurry Seal 201442 EA $2.65 533,821.30 $ $0.00 - $ $2.55 513,677.10 $ 16 16 AB Shoulder Backing 36 LF $230.00 8,280.00 $ $0.00 - $ $280.00 10,080.00 $ 17 17 Thermoplastic Traffic Striping Caltrans Detail 6 9309 LF $1.25 11,636.25 $ $0.00 - $ $1.25 11,636.25 $ 18 18 Thermoplastic Traffic Striping Caltrans Detail 9 60 LF $1.20 72.00 $ $0.00 - $ $1.25 75.00 $ 19 19 Thermoplastic Traffic Striping Caltrans Detail 21 50 EA $2.30 115.00 $ $0.00 - $ $2.45 122.50 $ 20 20 Thermoplastic Traffic Striping Caltrans Detail 22 8873 $2.50 22,182.50 $ $0.00 $2.65 23,513.45 $ 21 21 Thermoplastic Traffic Striping Caltrans Detail 28 93 $5.00 465.00 $ $0.00 $5.00 465.00 $ 22 22 Thermoplastic Traffic Striping Caltrans Detail 38 174 $2.00 348.00 $ $0.00 $2.10 365.40 $ 23 23 Thermoplastic Traffic Striping Caltrans Detail 38A 148 $1.75 259.00 $ $0.00 $1.85 273.80 $ 24 24 Thermoplastic Traffic Striping Caltrans Detail 39 3441 $1.25 4,301.25 $ $0.00 $1.30 4,473.30 $ 25 25 Thermoplastic Traffic Striping Caltrans Detail 39A 512 $1.25 640.00 $ $0.00 $1.30 665.60 $ 26 26 Thermoplastic White or Yellow Line 123 $3.00 369.00 $ $0.00 $3.00 369.00 $ 27 27 Thermoplastic Pavement Markings 3798 $10.00 37,980.00 $ $0.00 $10.55 40,068.90 $ 28 28 Thermoplastic Limit Line (White) 1589 $9.00 14,301.00 $ $0.00 $9.50 15,095.50 $ 29 29 Thermoplastic White Basic Crosswalk 1080 $9.00 9,720.00 $ $0.00 $9.50 10,260.00 $ 30 30 Thermoplastic Yellow Basic Crosswalk 459 $9.00 4,131.00 $ $0.00 $9.50 4,360.50 $ 31 31 Thermoplastic Yellow Ladder Crosswalk 899 $62.00 55,738.00 $ $0.00 $64.75 58,210.25 $ 32 32 Thermoplastic Advanced Speed Hump Marking 2600 $9.00 23,400.00 $ $0.00 $9.50 24,700.00 $ 33 33 Thermoplastic Chevron Marking 26 $135.00 3,510.00 $ $0.00 $142.75 3,711.50 $ 34 34 Thermoplastic Parking T's 38 $45.00 1,710.00 $ $0.00 $47.60 1,808.80 $ 35 35 Custom Nonreflective Marker Rumble Strips 270 $14.00 3,780.00 $ $0.00 $14.80 3,996.00 $ 36 36 Blue Fire Hydrant Pavement Markers 64 $25.00 1,600.00 $ $0.00 $26.45 1,692.80 $ 37 37 Sign and Post 3 $700.00 2,100.00 $ $0.00 $740.15 2,220.45 $ 38 38 Painted Curb (Revocable Bid Item) 6400 $3.00 19,200.00 $ $0.00 $3.15 20,160.00 $

TOTAL AMOUNT BID
10% Contingency 462,179.10 $ $ 496,123.44
TOTAL BID AMOUNT (including 10% contingency)

BID TABULATION
$ 4,961,234.35
$ - 5,083,970.10 $ 5,457,357.79 $
BID QUANTITIES A. Teichert & Son Gloria Washington Trucking Pavement Coatings Co. $ - 4,621,791.00 $
1445
1446
1447
1448
450 Civic Center Plaza, 2nd Fl - Engineering  Richmond, CA 94804  Phone: (510) 232-2201 1 MEMORANDUM

PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
August 5, 2025
Gloria Washington Trucking, Inc.

P.O. Box 2884
Richmond, CA 94802-2884
SUBJECT: Bid Disqualification - 2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal To Whom it May Concern,
Thank you for participating in the bidding process for the 2025 Paving Project – Rubberized Cape Seal.

Following a comprehensive review of your submitted bid, it has been determined that the proposal does not meet the requirements set forth in the project’s bid documents. Specifically, your bid indicates an intent to provide trucking support services as a subcontractor, rather than to assume responsibility for the full scope of construction work required under the contract.

Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 1101, a bid is deemed non-responsive if it fails to conform to the essential requirements of the invitation for bids. Because performance of the full construction scope is a material requirement of this project, your bid has been classified as non-responsive and is therefore disqualified from further consideration.

We appreciate your interest in doing business with the City of Richmond and encourage you to submit bids for future projects that align more closely with your service offerings.

If you have any questions or require further clarification, please feel free to contact me at (510) 620-6645 or via email at [email protected].

Thank you again for your time and understanding.

Respectfully,
Dan Santos, Assistant Engineer
Public Works Department, Engineering Division
510-620-6645
[email protected]
1449

GLORIA WASHINGTON
TRUCKING, INC.

P.O. Box 2884
Richmond, CA 94802-2884
Phone: 415-298-9431 Fax: 510-215-2232
Email: [email protected]
PUC# 130-992 CA# 8791
_________________________________________________________________________________________________ MEMBER OF TEAMSTER LOCAL 853

UNION HOURLY TRUCKING RATES
Rates are for Prevailing wage jobs.

Material & job specific quotes available upon request.
3 Axle 10 Wheeler
Weekdays……………..128.00
Daily OT/Saturday…………………………..134.00
5-Axle Semi-End
Weekdays……………..137.00
Daily OT/Saturday…………………………..150.00
Super 10 & Flat Beds
Weekdays……………..150.00
Daily OT/Saturday…………………………..156.00
Highsides and Low-beds
Weekdays……………..162.00
Daily OT/Saturday………………………….168.00
Bridge tolls will be charged per crossing per job

PLEASE NOTE
* 4 hour minimum showup time.
* A minimum of 6 hours will be charged at the appropriate rate for trucks ordered to work that work less than 6 hours, except if work is canceled due to weather. Trucking performed in excess of 6 hours will be charged at the appropriate rate times the actual hours worked, plus travel time (back to the loading site).
* Trucking supply based on availability at time of dispatch. * For projects requiring Certified Payroll reporting add $15 per truck per day worked. * Rates subject to fuel increases.
1450

August 26, 2025
Public Works
DATE: August 26, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, PE, Director of Public Works
Robert Armijo, PE, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Janney Lockman, AICP, Associate Transportation
Planner
Subject: A resolution to accept and appropriate the Housing Incentive Pool grant for the Bayview to BART and
McBryde Avenue Safe Routes to Parks Projects.

FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City of Richmond has been awarded Housing Incentive Pool (HIP) grant funding in the amount of
$450,000 for the Bayview to BART Project, and $922,000
for the McBryde Safe Routes to Parks Project.

Required match funding is available through the Measure J Fund. There is no fiscal impact to the General Fund.

Funds will be appropriated to the Engineering Grant Fund (Fund 1054) as follows:
 Bayview to BART ($450,000) – Account Strings:
20236031-400733-23040 & 20236031-40078-
23040
 McBryde Safe Routes to Parks ($922,000) –
Account Strings: 20236031-40073-23039 &
20236031-400708-23039

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

March 25, 2025
AGENDA
REPORT
1451

August 26, 2025

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

City staff recommends City Council approval to accept
and appropriate Housing Incentive Pool (HIP) grant funds for the Bayview to BART Project and the McBryde Safe
Routes to Parks Projects.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution to ACCEPT and APPROPRIATE Housing Incentive Pool (HIP) grant funding in the amount of $450,000 for the Bayview to BART Project and
$922,000 for the McBryde Safe Routes to Parks Project – Public Works (Janney Lockman 510-307-8097 / Robert
Armijo 510-620-5477).

DISCUSSION:

On March 25, 2025, Richmond City Council adopted Resolution 28-25 to apply for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s (MTC) Housing Incentive Pool Grant (HIP) to support the Bayview to BART Project and McBryde Safe Routes to Parks Project. The City was awarded $450,000 for the Bayview to BART Project, and $922,000 for the McBryde Safe Routes to Parks Projects. City staff now recommend that the City Council accept and appropriate these funds for the design and construction of both projects.

The MTC HIP grant allocated $71 million on a per-unit basis to the 15 Bay Area jurisdictions that issued the greatest number of Certificates of Occupancy for housing units affordable to low-, very low-, and moderate-incomes from 2018-2022. Funding is restricted to transportation projects that support new housing production. Richmond ranked 5th in the Bay Area for total Certificates of Occupancy issued and as a result, was eligible for up to $2,450,000 in HIP funding. The remaining $1,078,000 was awarded to the Downtown Point Richmond Bicycle and Pedestrian Connectivity Project, which is being accepted and appropriated through a separate resolution. As part of the HIP funding request, staff also requested funding to construct bus shelters on Carlson Boulevard, however, this project was not awarded funding.

The Bayview to BART Project aims to create a safer and more accessible walking and biking connection between the El Cerrito Del Norte BART station to the San Francisco Bay Trail. It will connect existing multi-use trails, improve conditions around parks and schools, and tie into an existing bicycle and pedestrian project in the City of El Cerrito.

The McBryde Safe Routes to Parks Project will make improvements on McBryde Avenue from 37th Street to Wildcat Canyon Regional Park, enhancing pedestrian and bicycle comfort and safety. When completed, this project will connect to the existing 1452

August 26, 2025
bicycle route on 37th Street and across I-80 to Wildcat Canyon Regional Park, creating a continuous active transportation route.

City staff recommends City Council adopt the accompanying resolution to accept and appropriate HIP grant funds to the Engineering Grant Fund (Fund 1054) for both projects.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-1 - OBAG 2 Regional Programs Project List
1453
Reso. No. XX-25

RESOLUTION NO. XX-25

RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,

CALIFORNIA, TO ACCEPT AND APPROPRIATE THE HOUSING INCENTIVE POOL

GRANT FUNDS FOR THE BAYVIEW TO BART AND MCBRYDE SAFE ROUTES TO

PARKS PROJECTS
WHEREAS, the Richmond City Council adopted Resolution 28-25 on March 25, 2025 to apply for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission’s Housing Incentive Pool Grant (HIP) for the Bayview to BART Project in the amount of $450,000 and the McBryde Safe Routes to Parks Project in the amount of $922,000; and
WHEREAS the City of Richmond has appropriated the required matching funds in the Fiscal Year 2025-26 annual budget in the amount of $58,303 for the Bayview to BART Project and $119,455 for the McBryde Safe Routes to Parks Project using the Measure J Fund; and WHEREAS, the Bayview to BART Project seeks to enhance safety, accessibility, and sustainability by creating a multimodal transportation corridor with protected bike lanes, buffered zones, upgraded pedestrian infrastructure; and WHEREAS, the McBryde Safe Routes to Parks Project seeks to enhance safety, accessibility, and sustainability by creating a multimodal transportation corridor with protected bike lanes, buffered zones, upgraded pedestrian infrastructure, and a traffic circle to improve pedestrian pathways; and includes new street trees to enhance aesthetics and environmental sustainability; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the City Council accept and appropriate the HIP Grant award in the amount of $450,000 for the Bayview to BART Project, and $922,000 for the McBryde Safe Routes to Parks Project into the Engineering Grant Fund (Fund 1054).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:

Section 1. The City Council finds that the above recitals are true and correct and have served, together with the accompanying Agenda Report, as the basis for the findings and actions adopted in this Resolution. These materials are incorporated herein by reference.

Section 2. The City Council hereby accepts and appropriates Housing Incentive Pool (HIP) grant funding in the amount of $450,000 for the Bayview to BART Project and $922,000 for the McBryde Safe Routes to Parks Project into the Engineering Grant Fund (Fund 1054).

Section 3. The City Council designates the City Clerk as the custodian of the documents and other materials which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the decision herein is based. These documents shall be maintained at the Office of the City Clerk, Richmond City Hall, 450 Civic Center Plaza, Richmond, California 94804.

Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. *********************
I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held August X, 2025 by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

PAMELA CHRISTIAN
1454
Reso. No. XX-25

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney
State of California }
County of Contra Costa : ss.

City of Richmond }
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. XX-25, finally passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on August X, 2025.

Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond
1455
Attachment B-1
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 Regional Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
April 2025
OBAG 2 Regional Programs Project List
PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE SPONSOR Total STP/CMAQ Other OBAG 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS $696,968,187 $132,976,260

1. REGIONAL PLANNING ACTIVITIES
Regional Planning MTC $9,555,000

1. REGIONAL PLANNING ACTIVITIES $9,555,000

2. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
Pavement Management Program MTC $1,500,000
Pavement Technical Advisory Program (PTAP) MTC $7,500,000 Statewide Local Streets and Roads (LSR) Needs Assessment MTC/Caltrans $250,000

2. PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PROGRAM $9,250,000

3. PDA PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION
PDA Planning and Implementation
PDA Implementation MTC $1,755,000
PDA Planning
Berkeley: San Pablo Avenue PDA Plan MTC $750,000
Oakland: MacArthur Transit Village PDA; North Oakland/Golden Gate PDA Plan MTC $800,000 Oakland: Eastmont Town Center/International Blvd; Fruitvale & Dimond; MacArthur Blvd Corridor; San Antonio MTC $800,000 Union City: Decoto Industrial Parkway Study Area Specific Plan 2.0 MTC $800,000 El Cerrito: San Pablo Avenue Specific Plan and EIR Update/Amendments MTC $308,000 Moraga: Moraga Center Specific Plan Implementation Project MTC $140,000 Richmond: Hilltop PDA Plan MTC $750,000
San Pablo: Rumrill Blvd PDA Plan MTC $250,000
Marin County: Urbanized Corridor/Marin City PDA Plan MTC $300,000 San Rafael: Downtown Precise Plan MTC $500,000
San Francisco: HUB Area EIR MTC $265,000
San Francisco: Transit Corridors Study MTC $316,000
Burlingame: Broadway Planning Area PDA Plan MTC $400,000 South San Francisco: Downtown Station Area PDA Plan MTC $500,000 Campbell: Hamilton Avenue Precise Plan MTC $400,000
Milpitas: Midtown PDA Plan MTC $275,000
Palo Alto: University Ave/Downtown PDA Plan MTC $800,000 San Jose/VTA: Diridon Integrated Station Area Concept Plan MTC $800,000 San Jose: SW Expressway/Race Street Light Rail Urban Village Plans MTC $22,000 Santa Clara: Downtown PDA Plan MTC $400,000
Santa Clara: El Camino Precise Plan EIR MTC $166,000
Vacaville: Downtown Specific Plan MTC $350,000
Vallejo: Waterfront Amendment MTC $1,200,000
Santa Rosa: Downtown Station Area Specific Plan Update/Amendment MTC $800,000 Staffing Assistance
MTC $162,000
Fremont: SB743 Implementation MTC $56,000
Hayward: SB743 Implementation MTC $66,000
Concord: VMT-based Transportation Impact Standards MTC $51,000 Concord: Galindo Street Corridor Plan MTC $154,000
Lafayette: Updated Parking Ordinance and Strategies MTC $124,000 San Jose: PDA/Citywide Design Guidelines MTC $7,000
Windsor: Parking Management and Pricing MTC $67,000
Technical Assistance
Emeryville: Developing the Highest and Best Use of the Public Curb MTC $55,000 Hayward: Micro Mobility/Safety Program MTC $75,000
Oakland: General Plan Framework - PDA Community Engagement Program MTC $41,000 San Leandro: BayFair TOD Infrastructure Design/Finance MTC $150,000 San Francisco: PDA Density Bonus Program MTC $55,000
Belmont: Transportation Demand Management Program MTC $57,000 San Mateo: TDM Ordinance MTC $150,000
San Jose: Urban Villages District Parking & Rezoning MTC $120,000 Sunnyvale: Downtown Sunnyvale Block 15 Sale/Land Exchange MTC $4,000 Santa Rosa/Sonoma County: Renewal Enterprise District MTC $150,000 BART AB2923 Implementation BART $1,000,000
Emeryville: Mitigate Regulation-Induced Displacement, Streamlined Asset Mgmt MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-1
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 10/26/16-C 12/21/16-C 03/22/17-C 05/24/17-C 06/28/17-C 07/26/17-C 09/27/17-C 10/25/17-C 12/20/17-C 01/24/18-C 02/28/18-C 03/28/18-C 04/25/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 07/25/18-C 09/26/18-C 11/28/18-C 12/19/18-C 02/27/19-C 03/27/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 10/23/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 05/27/20-C 07/22/20-C 11/20/20-C 01/27/21-C 02/24/21-C 04/28/21-C 05/26/21-C 06/23/21-C 07/28/21-C 09/22/21-C 01/26/22-C 03/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 06/22/22-C 09/28/22-C 10/26/22-C 03/22/23-C 04/26/23-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C 03/27/24-C 04/24/24-C 05/22/24-C 11/20/24-C 12/18/24-C 01/22/25-C 02/26/25-C 03/26/25-C 04/23/25-C
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 1456 1 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-1 Attachment B-1
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 Regional Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
April 2025
OBAG 2 Regional Programs Project List
PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE SPONSOR Total STP/CMAQ Other OBAG 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS $696,968,187 $132,976,260
MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-1
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 10/26/16-C 12/21/16-C 03/22/17-C 05/24/17-C 06/28/17-C 07/26/17-C 09/27/17-C 10/25/17-C 12/20/17-C 01/24/18-C 02/28/18-C 03/28/18-C 04/25/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 07/25/18-C 09/26/18-C 11/28/18-C 12/19/18-C 02/27/19-C 03/27/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 10/23/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 05/27/20-C 07/22/20-C 11/20/20-C 01/27/21-C 02/24/21-C 04/28/21-C 05/26/21-C 06/23/21-C 07/28/21-C 09/22/21-C 01/26/22-C 03/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 06/22/22-C 09/28/22-C 10/26/22-C 03/22/23-C 04/26/23-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C 03/27/24-C 04/24/24-C 05/22/24-C 11/20/24-C 12/18/24-C 01/22/25-C 02/26/25-C 03/26/25-C 04/23/25-C
Marin/Sonoma VMT Implementation Group MTC $178,000
Napa/Solano VMT Implementation Group MTC $178,000
Various Jurisdictions: VMT Implementation Group MTC $132,000 Priority Sites Technical Assistance
Alameda County: District Finance MTC $250,000
Alameda County: Bay Fair BART Parking Lot MTC $250,000
American Canyon: Adobe Lumber MTC $150,000
Berkeley: Ashby BART Station Area MTC $250,000
VTA: Great Mall Station (Milpitas) MTC $40,000
Orinda: St John the Evangelist Orthodox Church MTC $150,000 Pleasanton: Dublin/Pleasanton BART MTC $250,000
Richmond: 12th and MacDonald MTC $100,000
VTA: River Oaks Campus (San Jose) MTC $40,000
Regionwide Priority Sites Technical Assistance MTC $141,000 Community-Based Transportation Plan (CBTP) Updates MTC
ACTC: CMA Planning (for Community-Based Transportation Plans) MTC $300,000 CCTA: Community-Based Transportation Plans MTC $215,000 TAM: Community-Based Transportation Plans MTC $75,000
NVTA: Community-Based Transportation Plans MTC $75,000
SFCTA: Community-Based Transportation Plans MTC $175,000 C/CAG: Community-Based Transportation Plans MTC $120,000 VTA: Community-Based Transportation Plans MTC $300,000
STA: Community-Based Transportation Plans MTC $95,000
SCTA: Community-Based Transportation Plans MTC $110,000 CBTP Program Evaluation MTC $35,000

3. PDA PLANNING & IMPLEMENTATION $20,000,000

4. CLIMATE INITIATIVES
Climate Initiatives
Spare the Air & EV Program Outreach (for Electric Vehicle Programs) BAAQMD $10,000,000 Parking Management Program
BART Variable Parking Pricing Project BART $1,147,000
Demand-Based Parking Pricing/Curb Mgmt in Business Districts/Ferry Terminals Alameda $742,000 OakPark+ Oakland $1,500,000
Parking Meter Program Update Martinez $1,269,000
Pay or Permit Parking Program Expansion SFMTA $1,494,000 Port of San Francisco-SFMTA Parking Management Pilot Port of SF $200,000 Parking Management Planning - Transit-Oriented Communities (TOC) Alameda County CDA: TOC Parking Management Planning MTC $300,000 Hayward: TOC Parking Management Planning MTC $300,000
Oakland: TOC Parking Management Planning MTC $300,000
Pleasanton: TOC Parking Management Planning MTC $150,000 Antioch: TOC Parking Management Planning MTC $100,000
Concord: TOC Parking Management Planning MTC $300,000
Orinda: TOC Parking Management Planning MTC $300,000
Larkspur: TOC Parking Management Planning MTC $175,000
Menlo Park: TOC Parking Management Planning MTC $200,000 Millbrae: TOC Parking Management Planning MTC $300,000
San Bruno: TOC Parking Management Planning MTC $100,000 Morgan Hill: TOC Parking Management Planning MTC $125,000 Parking Management Unprogrammed Balance TBD $10,406
Mobility Hubs Pilot Program
Mobility Hubs Technical Assistance MTC $150,000
BART: MacArthur BART Station BART $539,084
Hayward: TOC Station Access and Circulation Planning MTC $300,000 Burlingame: Caltrain Station - Burlingame Square Transit Hub Burlingame $896,000 Millbrae: BART and Caltrain Station - Millbrae Transit Center Millbrae $345,150 Mountain View: Mountain View Mobility Hub Pilot Mountain View $200,000 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 1457 2 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-1 Attachment B-1
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 Regional Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
April 2025
OBAG 2 Regional Programs Project List
PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE SPONSOR Total STP/CMAQ Other OBAG 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS $696,968,187 $132,976,260
MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-1
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 10/26/16-C 12/21/16-C 03/22/17-C 05/24/17-C 06/28/17-C 07/26/17-C 09/27/17-C 10/25/17-C 12/20/17-C 01/24/18-C 02/28/18-C 03/28/18-C 04/25/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 07/25/18-C 09/26/18-C 11/28/18-C 12/19/18-C 02/27/19-C 03/27/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 10/23/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 05/27/20-C 07/22/20-C 11/20/20-C 01/27/21-C 02/24/21-C 04/28/21-C 05/26/21-C 06/23/21-C 07/28/21-C 09/22/21-C 01/26/22-C 03/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 06/22/22-C 09/28/22-C 10/26/22-C 03/22/23-C 04/26/23-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C 03/27/24-C 04/24/24-C 05/22/24-C 11/20/24-C 12/18/24-C 01/22/25-C 02/26/25-C 03/26/25-C 04/23/25-C
Vallejo: Vallejo Ferry Terminal Vallejo $200,000
Mobility Hubs unprogrammed balance TBD $32,360
Targeted Transportation Alternatives MTC $325,000
Spare the Air Youth Program - 2 MTC $1,417,000

4. CLIMATE INITIATIVES $23,417,000

5. REGIONAL ACTIVE OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT
Active Operational Management
AOM Implementation MTC $23,737,000
Bay Area 511 Traveler Information
511 Next Gen MTC $26,148,000
511 Implementation MTC $7,450,000
Rideshare
Rideshare Implementation MTC $720,000
Carpool Program MTC $7,280,000
Vanpool Program MTC $2,000,000
Commuter Benefits Implementation MTC $674,000
Commuter Benefits Program MTC $1,111,000
Napa Valley Transportation Demand Strategies (Fund Exchange) MTC/NVTA $1,100,000 Bay Bridge Forward 2018
Transbay Higher Capacity Bus Fleet/Increased Service Frequencies AC Transit $1,200,000 Pilot Transbay Express Bus Routes AC Transit $800,000
Eastbay Commuter Parking MTC $855,000
Transbay Higher Capacity Bus Fleet/Increased Service Frequencies WestCat $2,000,000 Bay Bridge Forward 2020
MTC $13,645,000
Dumbarton Forward
MTC $4,375,000
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Forward
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Bikeway Access (Fund Exchange) Richmond $500,000 Richmond-San Rafael Bridge Forward (Fund Exchange) MTC $1,160,000 Freeway Performance Program
FPP: I-880 (I-80 to I-280) MTC $3,000,000
FPP: I-880 Optimized Corridor Operations MTC $2,240,000 FPP: I-580 WB HOV Lane Extension (SR 24 to I-80/SFOBB approach) PL & ENV Only MTC $625,000 FPP: I-80 (Carquinez Bridge to Fremont St., SF) PL only MTC $3,000,000 FPP: CC I-680 NB HOV/Express Lanes (Ala Co. to Sol Co.) MTC $10,000,000 FPP: I-80 Central Ave Interchange Improvements Richmond $2,000,000 FPP: SR 37 (US 101 to I-80) PL only MTC $1,000,000
FPP: Napa Valley Forward Traffic Calming & Multimodal Imps. MTC $1,000,000 FPP: US 101 (SR 85 to San Francisco Co. Line) MTC $3,000,000 FPP: SCTA US 101/Marin Sonoma Narrows (MSN) B2 Phase 2 SCTA $1,000,000 Program for Arterial System Synchronization (PASS) MTC $5,000,000 Innovative Deployments for Enhanced Arterials (IDEA) Category 1 AC Transit: Dumbarton Express Route (SR84) MTC $1,410,000 Hayward: Various Locations MTC $263,000
Pleasanton: Various Locations MTC $234,000
Union City: Union City Blvd & Decoto Rd MTC $619,000
San Ramon: Bollinger Canyon Rd & Crow Canyon Rd MTC $517,000 San Rafael: Downtown San Rafael MTC $776,000
South San Francisco: Various Locations MTC $120,000
San Jose: Citywide MTC $910,000
Innovative Deployments for Enhanced Arterials (IDEA) Category 2 LAVTA/Dublin: Citywide MTC $161,000
Emeryville: Powell, Shellmound, Christie & 40th St MTC $661,000 Concord: Concord Blvd, Clayton Rd & Willow Pass Rd (Fund Exchange) MTC $589,000 MTC Concord Blvd, Clayton Rd & Willow Pass Rd (Fund Exchange) MTC $30,000 Walnut Creek: Various locations (Fund Exchange) MTC $621,000 Los Gatos: Los Gatos Blvd MTC $644,000
Preliminary Engineering
SR 84 (US 101 to I-880) Dumbarton Forward
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 1458 3 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-1 Attachment B-1
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 Regional Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
April 2025
OBAG 2 Regional Programs Project List
PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE SPONSOR Total STP/CMAQ Other OBAG 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS $696,968,187 $132,976,260
MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-1
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 10/26/16-C 12/21/16-C 03/22/17-C 05/24/17-C 06/28/17-C 07/26/17-C 09/27/17-C 10/25/17-C 12/20/17-C 01/24/18-C 02/28/18-C 03/28/18-C 04/25/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 07/25/18-C 09/26/18-C 11/28/18-C 12/19/18-C 02/27/19-C 03/27/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 10/23/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 05/27/20-C 07/22/20-C 11/20/20-C 01/27/21-C 02/24/21-C 04/28/21-C 05/26/21-C 06/23/21-C 07/28/21-C 09/22/21-C 01/26/22-C 03/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 06/22/22-C 09/28/22-C 10/26/22-C 03/22/23-C 04/26/23-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C 03/27/24-C 04/24/24-C 05/22/24-C 11/20/24-C 12/18/24-C 01/22/25-C 02/26/25-C 03/26/25-C 04/23/25-C
VTA: Veterans Admin. Palo Alto Medical Center VTA $845,000 Connected Vehicles/Automated Vehicles (CAV) MTC $178,000 VTA: Palo Alto Advanced Transit Passenger Management VTA $976,000 SFCTA/TIMMA: Treasure Island Automated Shuttle Pilot MTC $828,000 Technical Advisory Services MTC $268,000
Project Evaluations MTC $250,000
Shared Use Mobility MTC $2,500,000
Regional Communications Infrastructure Upgrade
TMS Implementation MTC $2,910,000
MTC/Caltrans $16,090,000
Incident Management
Incident Management Implementation MTC $4,160,000
I-880 ICM Northern MTC $6,200,000
I-880 ICM Central MTC/San Leandro $2,640,000

5. REGIONAL ACTIVE OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT $168,020,000 $4,000,000

6. TRANSIT PRIORITIES
BART Car Replacement/Expansion BART $99,800,000
GGB Suicide Deterrent (for BART Car Replacement/Expansion) GGBH&TD $9,760,668 $30,239,332 Clipper MTC $34,200,000
Transit Performance Initiative
Foothill Corridor Planning Study AC Transit $1,500,000
MacDonald Avenue Transit Signal Priority - Phase 1 AC Transit $2,237,000 Transit Corridors Study CCCTA $400,000
Marin County Hwy 101 Part-Time Transit Lane MCTD/TAM $1,107,000 Napa Valley Transit Safety and Efficiency Improvements NVTA $1,060,000 29 Sunset Improvements - Phase 2 SFMTA $2,959,000
Muni Forward Five-Minute Network Corridor Planning Program SFMTA $3,038,000 Third Street Dynamic Traffic Signal Optimization SFMTA $2,000,000 El Camino Real Mid-County Transit and Multimodal Corridor Plan SMCTA $407,000 Monterey Road Transit Lane VTA $575,000

6. TRANSIT PRIORITIES $159,043,668 $30,239,332

7. PRIORITY CONSERVATION AREA (PCA)
Regional Peninsula, Southern and Eastern Counties PCA Grant Program Bay Area GreenPrint: PCA Functionality Imps MTC/GreenInfo Network $30,000 PCA Grant Implementation MTC/Coastal Conservancy $525,000 $500,000 Alameda County: Niles Canyon Trail, Phase 1 Alameda County $321,000 Livermore: Arroyo Road Trail Livermore $400,000
WOEIP/Urban Biofilter: Adapt Oakland Urban Greening in West Oakland WOEIP/Urban Biofilter $300,000 EBRPD: Bay Trail at Point Molate (RSR Bridge to Point Molate Beach Park) EBRPD $1,000,000 JMLT: Pacheco Marsh/Lower Walnut Creek Restoration and Public Access John Muir Land Trust $950,000 SFCTA: Yerba Buena Island Multi-Use Pathway (PE/ENV) SFCTA $1,000,000 San Francisco: McLaren Park and Neighborhood Connections Plan SF Recreation and Parks $194,000 San Francisco/Coastal Conservancy: Twin Peaks Trail Improvement SF Rec and Park/Conservancy $74,000 GGNPC/NPS: Rancho Corral de Tierra Unit Management Plan Engagement National Parks Service $200,000 SMCHD: Pillar Point Public Access Improvements San Mateo Co. Harbor District $298,000 Menlo Park: Bedwell Bayfront Park Access Improvements Menlo Park $520,000 San Mateo Co.: Colma Creek Adaptation Study (Colma Creek Connector) San Mateo Co. $110,000 San Mateo Co.: San Bruno Mtn. Habitat Conservation Plan Grazing Pilot San Mateo Co. $137,900 South San Francisco: Sign Hill Conservation and Trail Master Plan South San Francisco $135,100 Point Blue: Pajaro River Watershed: Habitat Restoration and Climate Resilient Imps. Point Blue Conservation Science $379,000 SCVOSA: Coyote Ridge Open Space Preserve Public Access, Phase 1 Point Blue Conservation Science $400,000 SCVOSA: Tilton Ranch Acquisition Santa Clara Valley Open Space Auth. $1,000,000 VTA $251,000
North Bay PCA Grant Program
Marin County $312,000
Marin Co: Wilson Hill Road Rehab Marin County $869,000
Marin Co: Wilson Hill Road Rehab. (for Corte Madera: Paradise Dr MUP) Regional Communications Infrastructure Upgrade
VTA: SR17 Bicycle/Ped Trail & Wildlife Overcrossing (Fund Exchange) Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 1459 4 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-1 Attachment B-1
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 Regional Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
April 2025
OBAG 2 Regional Programs Project List
PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE SPONSOR Total STP/CMAQ Other OBAG 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS $696,968,187 $132,976,260
MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-1
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 10/26/16-C 12/21/16-C 03/22/17-C 05/24/17-C 06/28/17-C 07/26/17-C 09/27/17-C 10/25/17-C 12/20/17-C 01/24/18-C 02/28/18-C 03/28/18-C 04/25/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 07/25/18-C 09/26/18-C 11/28/18-C 12/19/18-C 02/27/19-C 03/27/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 10/23/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 05/27/20-C 07/22/20-C 11/20/20-C 01/27/21-C 02/24/21-C 04/28/21-C 05/26/21-C 06/23/21-C 07/28/21-C 09/22/21-C 01/26/22-C 03/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 06/22/22-C 09/28/22-C 10/26/22-C 03/22/23-C 04/26/23-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C 03/27/24-C 04/24/24-C 05/22/24-C 11/20/24-C 12/18/24-C 01/22/25-C 02/26/25-C 03/26/25-C 04/23/25-C
Novato: Nave Dr/Bell Marin Keys Rehabilitation (for Hill Recreation Area Imps.) Novato $104,000 Novato: Vineyard Rd Improvements (for Hill Recreation Area Imps.) Novato $265,000 SMART Pathway: Great Redwood Trail – Novato SMART $500,000 NVTA: Vine Trail - St. Helena to Calistoga NVTA $711,000 Napa: Vine Trail - Soscol Ave Corridor Napa $650,000
Napa County: Silverado Trail Rehabilitation - Phase L Napa County $689,000 Solano County: Suisun Valley Farm-to-Market - Phase 3 Bike Imps Solano County $2,050,000 Sonoma County: Crocker Bridge Bike/Pedestrian Bridge Sonoma County $1,280,000 Sonoma County: Joe Rodota Trail Bridge Replacement Sonoma County $770,000

7. PRIORITY CONSERVATION AREA (PCA) $9,976,000 $6,949,000

8. BAY AREA HOUSING INITIATIVES
Bay Area Preservation Pilot (BAPP) MTC $10,000,000
Housing Incentive Pool (HIP)
HIP Rank 1 - San Francisco TBD $14,270,000
Folsom Streetscape SFMTA $4,000,000
Powell Street Improvement SFMTA $4,000,000
Lincoln Way Traffic Signals SFMTA $3,400,000
West Side Bridges Seismic Retrofit (for YBI MUP) SFCTA $5,500,000 New Flyer Bus Midlife Overhaul Phase I SFMTA $4,663,000 HIP Rank 2 - Oakland (Revised)
Laurel Access to Mills, Maxwell Park & Seminary (LAMMPS) (Added) Oakland $10,033,000 HIP Rank 3 - Fremont
Fremont Boulevard Multimodal Corridor Fremont $4,098,000 HIP Rank 4 - San Jose
Better Bikeway San Jose - San Fernando St San Jose $2,233,000 San Jose Downtown Bikeways - Quick Strike San Jose $1,421,000 HIP Rank 5 - Richmond (Revised)
Bayview to BART (Added) Richmond $450,000
Downtown Point Richmond Bicycle Connectivity (Added) Richmond $1,078,000 McBryde Ave Safe Routes to Parks (Added) Richmond $922,000 HIP Rank 6 - San Leandro (Revised)
MacArthur Superior Roundabout (Added) San Leandro $1,859,000 HIP Rank 7 - Sunnyvale (Revised)
Poplar Ave Sidewalk (Added) Sunnyvale $1,000,000
Sunnyvale Ave/California Ave Traffic Signal Upgrades (Added) Sunnyvale $836,000 HIP Rank 8 - Mountain View (Revised)
Middlefield Rd Complete Streets (Added) Mountain View $1,766,000 HIP Rank 9 - Santa Clara (Revised)
Santa Clara Uncontrolled Crosswalks Phase 2 (Added) Santa Clara $1,754,000 HIP Rank 10 - Berkeley (Revised)
San Pablo Ave and Ashby Ave Intersection Improvements (Added) Berkeley $1,508,000 HIP Rank 11 - American Canyon
Pavement Rehab (Poco Wy, Melvin Rd, James Rd) American Canyon $1,333,000 HIP Rank 12 - Redwood City
Jefferson Avenue Safety Improvements Redwood City $1,011,000 Page Street Bike Boulevard Redwood City $310,000
HIP Rank 13 - Daly City (Revised)
John Daly Blvd Pedestrian and Bicycle Facility Improvements (Added) Daly City $1,304,000 HIP Rank 14 - Santa Rosa
Santa Rosa US 101 Bicycle and Pedestrian Overcrossing Santa Rosa $1,292,000 HIP Rank 15 - San Mateo (Revised)
El Camino Real/Humbolt St/Hillsdale Blvd Intersection Safety (Added) San Mateo $959,000 Sub-HIP Pilot Program
Fairfield: Pavement Preservation/Rehabilitation (for One Lake Apts. Linear Park Trail) Fairfield $2,100,000 Vacaville: Pavement Preservation/Rehabilitation (for Allison PDA Affordable Housing) Vacaville $1,900,000 Marin County: Marin City Pedestrian Crossing Imps. Marin County $300,000 NVTA: Imola Park and Ride NVTA $300,000
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 1460 5 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-1 Attachment B-1
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 Regional Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
April 2025
OBAG 2 Regional Programs Project List
PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE SPONSOR Total STP/CMAQ Other OBAG 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS $696,968,187 $132,976,260
MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-1
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 10/26/16-C 12/21/16-C 03/22/17-C 05/24/17-C 06/28/17-C 07/26/17-C 09/27/17-C 10/25/17-C 12/20/17-C 01/24/18-C 02/28/18-C 03/28/18-C 04/25/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 07/25/18-C 09/26/18-C 11/28/18-C 12/19/18-C 02/27/19-C 03/27/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 10/23/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 05/27/20-C 07/22/20-C 11/20/20-C 01/27/21-C 02/24/21-C 04/28/21-C 05/26/21-C 06/23/21-C 07/28/21-C 09/22/21-C 01/26/22-C 03/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 06/22/22-C 09/28/22-C 10/26/22-C 03/22/23-C 04/26/23-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C 03/27/24-C 04/24/24-C 05/22/24-C 11/20/24-C 12/18/24-C 01/22/25-C 02/26/25-C 03/26/25-C 04/23/25-C
Santa Rosa: Downtown Multi-modal and Fiber Improvements Santa Rosa $400,000

8. BAY AREA HOUSING INITIATIVES $57,730,000 $28,270,000

9. SAFE & SEAMLESS MOBILITY QUICK-STRIKE
County & Local
Alameda
CTA planning & programming (for Youth and Adult Bicycle Promotion & Education) ACTC $160,000 Alameda County Safe Routes to Schools ACTC $1,500,000
CTA planning & programming ACTC $354,000
AC Transit Tempo Quick Build Transit Lane Delineation AC Transit $300,000 AC Transit Quick Builds Transit Lanes AC Transit $954,000 Anita Avenue Safe and Accessible Route to School and Transit Alameda County $2,000,000 BART Fare Collection Equipment (for Oakland East Bay Greenway Segment II) BART/Oakland $1,000,000 Fremont Boulevard/Walnut Avenue Protected Intersection Fremont $1,271,000 Fremont Boulevard/Grimmer Boulevard Protected Intersection Fremont $1,415,000 LAVTA Passenger Facilities Enhancements LAVTA $2,000,000 Oakland 14th Street Complete Streets Oakland $1,000,000 Contra Costa
CTA planning & programming CCTA $242,000
BART Fare Collection Equipment (for Lafayette Town Center Pathway and BART Bike Station Project) BART / Lafayette $1,825,000 BART Fare Collection Equipment (for Bicycle, Pedestrian, and ADA Imps. at Pittsburg/Bay Point BART) BART $1,510,000 East Downtown Concord PDA Access & Safe Routes to Transit Concord $2,164,000 Richmond 13th Street Complete Streets Richmond $2,821,000 Marin
CTA planning & programming TAM $141,000
Marin County Bus Stop Improvements Marin Transit $1,200,000 SMART Pathway - San Rafael McInnis Pkwy to Smith Ranch Road SMART $1,858,000 Napa
CTA planning & programming NVTA $162,000
Napa Valley Safe Routes to School NVTA $100,000
Napa Valley Forward: SR 29/Rutherford & Oakville Roundabouts MTC $1,000,000 San Francisco
CTA planning & programming SFCTA $180,000
Downtown San Francisco Congestion Pricing Study SFCTA $200,000 Embarcadero Station Platform Elevator Capacity & Redundancy BART $3,144,302 San Francisco Folsom Streetscape SFMTA $5,000,000
Safe Routes to School Non-Infrastructure Program SFMTA $2,100,000 San Mateo
CTA planning & programming C/CAG $183,000
Planning and Programming of safe and seamless mobility C/CAG $200,000 Burlingame City-Wide Pedestrian Safe Routes and Mobility Imps Burlingame $200,000 San Bruno Transit Corridor Pedestrian Connection Phase 4 San Bruno $385,000 Broadmoor SRTS Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Imps San Mateo County $1,419,000 El Camino Real Grand Boulevard Initiative Phase III South San Francisco $2,120,000 East of 101 Transit Expansion Project South San Francisco $49,924 $430,076 Santa Clara
CTA planning & programming VTA $419,000
Evaluating on-demand shuttle strategies for improved transit access VTA $200,000 VTA Electronic Locker Upgrade and Replacement VTA $1,987,000 Mountain View Stierlin Road Bicycle and Pedestrian Improvements Mountain View $4,007,000 San Jose Julian Street & McKee Road Vision Zero Complete Streets San Jose $705,000 San Jose Bascom Avenue Protected Bike Lanes & Complete Street San Jose $690,000 En Movimiento Quick Build Network for East San Jose San Jose $1,325,000 San Jose - Downtown Bikeways San Jose $4,025,000
Saratoga Blue Hills Elementary Pedestrian Crossing at UPRR Saratoga $1,800,000 Sunnyvale Bicycle, Pedestrian and SRTS Safety Improvements Sunnyvale $1,900,000 Solano
CTA planning & programming STA $110,000
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 1461 6 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-1 Attachment B-1
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 Regional Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
April 2025
OBAG 2 Regional Programs Project List
PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE SPONSOR Total STP/CMAQ Other OBAG 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS $696,968,187 $132,976,260
MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-1
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 10/26/16-C 12/21/16-C 03/22/17-C 05/24/17-C 06/28/17-C 07/26/17-C 09/27/17-C 10/25/17-C 12/20/17-C 01/24/18-C 02/28/18-C 03/28/18-C 04/25/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 07/25/18-C 09/26/18-C 11/28/18-C 12/19/18-C 02/27/19-C 03/27/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 10/23/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 05/27/20-C 07/22/20-C 11/20/20-C 01/27/21-C 02/24/21-C 04/28/21-C 05/26/21-C 06/23/21-C 07/28/21-C 09/22/21-C 01/26/22-C 03/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 06/22/22-C 09/28/22-C 10/26/22-C 03/22/23-C 04/26/23-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C 03/27/24-C 04/24/24-C 05/22/24-C 11/20/24-C 12/18/24-C 01/22/25-C 02/26/25-C 03/26/25-C 04/23/25-C
STA Mobility Planning STA $200,000
Solano Safe Routes to School Non-Infrastructure Program STA $600,000 Fairfield/Vacaville Hannigan Station Capacity Improvements Fairfield $1,900,000 Vallejo Springs Rd Pavement Preservation Vallejo $1,800,000 Sonoma
CTA planning & programming SCTA $135,000
Countywide Active Transportation Plan SCTA $200,000
Cotati Downtown- Civic Center Connectivity and Safety Improvements Cotati $242,000 $1,008,000 Healdsburg Bike Share Healdsburg $250,000
Rohnert Park Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Improvements Rohnert Park $522,000 Santa Rosa Transit Mall Roadbed Rehabilitation Santa Rosa $868,000 Sebastopol SR 116 and Bodega Ave Pedestrian Access and Mobility Enhancements Sebastopol $476,000 SMART Pathway - Petaluma Payran to Lakeville SMART $806,000 Regional & Corridor
Regional Planning
FasTrak START Pilot Evaluation Study MTC $900,000
Diridon Station Planning & Studies MTC $1,000,000
Regional and Corridor
Bay Bridge Forward: I-580 WB HOV Lane Extension MTC/ACTC $7,000,000 Napa Valley Forward: SR 29/Rutherford & Oakville Roundabouts MTC $6,000,000 Redwood City Roosevelt Avenue Quick-Build Redwood City $755,000 Transit Recovery Blue Ribbon Task Force
East Bay Integration and Coordination Implementation Planning CCTA $500,000 Solano Integration and Coordination Implementation Planning STA $500,000 Accessibility: Clipper for Centralized Program Eligibility Verification MTC $900,000 Bay Bridge Forward: Preliminary Engineering MTC $1,250,000 Customer Information: Mapping & Wayfinding MTC $7,391,538 Unprogrammed Balance TBD $700,000

9. SAFE & SEAMLESS MOBILITY QUICK-STRIKE $75,793,764 $17,866,076

10. REGIONAL STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS (RSI)
AC Transit Bus Purchase (for Solano I-80 Express Lanes) AC Transit $4,667,000 SR 84 Ardenwood Intermodal Bus Facility PA&ED (Fund Exchange) CCJPA $100,000 CC I-680 NB HOV/Express Lanes Ala Co to Sol Co (Fund Exchange) CCTA/MTC $4,000,000 GGB Suicide Deterrent System GGBHTD $7,910,000
Pavement Rehab (for Downtown Novato SMART Station) Novato $617,000 Old Redwood Highway Multi-Use Pathway Larkspur $1,120,000 Grand Ave Bridge San Rafael $763,000
Grand Ave Bike/Ped Imps (for SMART 2nd to Andersen Pathway) San Rafael $1,000,000 US 101 Marin-Sonoma Narrows TAM $2,000,000
US 101 Marin-Sonoma Narrows (MSN) B7 (Loan for RM3) TAM $61,708,245 $13,942,852 Diridon Station Planning & Studies MTC $1,000,000
VTA $249,000
Broadmoor SRTS Pedestrian Safety & Mobility Imps San Mateo County $184,000 I-80 Express Lanes in Solano County (Loan for RM3) STA $63,464,510 $3,255,000 I-80 Express Lanes in Solano County (Toll System) BAIFA $28,454,000 US 101/Marin Sonoma Narrows (MSN) B2 Phase 2 (Fund Exchange) SCTA $15,400,000

10. REGIONAL STRATEGIC INVESTMENTS (RSI) $164,182,755 $45,651,852 OBAG 2 REGIONAL PROGRAMS TOTAL: $696,968,187 $132,976,260 VTA: Highway 17 Bicycle/Pedestrian Trail and Wildlife Overcrossing (Fund Exch.) Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 1462 7 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-1 Attachment B-2
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 County Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
February 2024
OBAG 2 County Programs Project List
SPONSOR STP/CMAQ Other
OBAG 2 COUNTY PROGRAMS $376,562,000

ALAMEDA COUNTY
CMA Planning Activities
Planning Activities Base ACTC $5,489,000
Planning Activities - Supplemental ACTC $2,800,000
Federal Aid Secondary (FAS)
Alameda County: Various Streets & Roads Preservation Alameda County $1,779,000 Safe Routes To School (SRTS)
ACTC: Alameda County SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program ACTC $5,340,000 County Program
ACTC: SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program - Supplemental ACTC $2,579,000 ACTC: SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program - OBAG 3 ACTC $1,267,000 Alameda: Central Ave Complete Street Alameda $3,487,000 Alameda: Grand St Pavement Resurfacing & Safety Improvements Alameda $827,000 Alameda: Clement Ave Complete Street Alameda $5,018,000 Alameda County: Meekland Ave Corridor Improvement, Phase II (Revised) Alameda County $9,300,000 Alameda County: Various Streets and Roads Preservation Alameda County $2,171,000 Albany: San Pablo Ave and Buchanan St Pedestrian Improvements Albany $340,000 Berkeley: Southside Complete Streets & Transit Improvements Berkeley $8,335,000 Dublin: Dublin Blvd Rehabilitation Dublin $661,000
Fremont: Complete Streets Upgrade of Relinquished SR 84 in Centerville PDA Fremont $7,695,000 Fremont: Various Streets and Roads Rehabilitation Fremont $2,760,000 Hayward: Main St Complete Street Hayward $1,675,000
Hayward: Winton Ave Complete Street Hayward $88,000
Livermore: Annual Pavement Preservation Livermore $1,382,000 MTC: I-580 Corridor Study MTC $200,000
Newark: Thornton Ave Pavement Rehabilitation Newark $592,000 Oakland: Lakeside Family Streets Oakland $4,792,000
Oakland: Citywide Various Streets and Roads Rehabilitation Oakland $4,895,000 Piedmont: Oakland Ave Improvements Piedmont $168,000
Pleasanton: Hacienda Business Park Pavement Rehabilitation Pleasanton $1,095,000 San Leandro: Washington Ave Rehabilitation San Leandro $1,048,000 Union City: Dyer Rd Pavement Rehabilitation Union City $872,000 ALAMEDA COUNTY TOTAL: $67,355,000 $9,300,000

CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
CMA Planning Activities
Planning Activities Base CCTA $4,342,000
Federal Aid Secondary (FAS)
Contra Costa County: Kirker Pass Rd Overlay Contra Costa County $1,343,000 Safe Routes To School (SRTS)
Antioch: L Street Pathway to Transit Antioch $1,469,000 Concord: Willow Pass Road Rehab and SRTS Concord $1,012,000 Contra Costa County: West County Walk & Bike Non-Infrastructure Prog. Contra Costa County $561,000 Moraga: Moraga Way and Canyon Rd/Camino Pablo Improvements Moraga $91,000 Pleasant Hill: Pleasant Hill Rd Improvements Pleasant Hill $67,000 Richmond: Lincoln Elementary Pedestrian Enhancements Richmond $497,000 San Ramon: San Ramon Valley Street Smarts Non-Infrastructure Program San Ramon $391,000 County Program
Antioch: Pavement Rehabilitation Antioch $2,474,000
Brentwood: Various Streets and Roads Preservation Brentwood $628,000 Clayton: Neighborhood Streets Rehabilitation Clayton $308,000 MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-2
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 12/21/16-C 04/26/17-C 06/28/17-C 11/15/17-C 12/20/17-C 02/28/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 09/26/18-C 12/19/18-C 01/23/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 09/23/20-C 07/28/21-C 11/17/21-C 12/15/21-C 02/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 05/25/22-C 10/28/22-C 11/16/22-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 09/27/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C

PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 1 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-2 1463
Attachment B-2
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 County Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
February 2024
OBAG 2 County Programs Project List
SPONSOR STP/CMAQ Other
OBAG 2 COUNTY PROGRAMS $376,562,000
MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-2
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 12/21/16-C 04/26/17-C 06/28/17-C 11/15/17-C 12/20/17-C 02/28/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 09/26/18-C 12/19/18-C 01/23/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 09/23/20-C 07/28/21-C 11/17/21-C 12/15/21-C 02/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 05/25/22-C 10/28/22-C 11/16/22-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 09/27/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C

PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE
Concord: Monument Blvd Class I Path Concord $4,368,000
Concord: Willow Pass Road Rehab and SRTS Concord $4,183,000 Contra Costa County: Local Streets and Roads Preservation Contra Costa County $3,847,000 Danville: Camino Ramon Improvements Danville $1,357,000 Danville: San Ramon Valley Blvd. Imps. (for: Diablo Road Trail) San Ramon $130,000 El Cerrito: Carlson Blvd and Central Ave Pavement Rehabilitation El Cerrito $424,000 El Cerrito: El Cerrito del Norte TOD Complete Streets Imps El Cerrito $4,960,000 Hercules: Sycamore/Willow Pavement Rehabilitation Hercules $492,000 Lafayette: Pleasant Hill Rd Pavement Rehabilitation Lafayette $579,000 Martinez: Downtown Streets Rehabilitation Martinez $846,000 Moraga: Moraga Way and Canyon Rd/Camino Pablo Improvements Moraga $596,000 Oakley: Street Repair and Resurfacing Oakley $969,000
Orinda: Orinda Way Pavement Rehabilitation Orinda $620,000 Pinole: San Pablo Ave Rehabilitation Pinole $586,000
Pinole: Safety Improvements at Appian Way and Marlesta Rd Pinole $350,000 Pinole: Safety Improvements at Appian Way and Marlesta Rd Pinole $350,000 Pittsburg: BART Pedestrian and Bicycle Connectivity Improvements Pittsburg $3,870,000 Pittsburg: Pavement Improvements Pittsburg $2,410,000
Pleasant Hill: Pleasant Hill Rd Improvements Pleasant Hill $920,000 Richmond: ADA Improvements on 7th, Central, Cutting, Giant Hwy Richmond $2,205,000 San Pablo: Giant Rd Pavement Rehabilitation San Pablo $618,000 San Ramon: Alcosta Blvd Pavement Rehabilitation San Ramon $1,175,000 San Ramon: Iron Horse Bike and Pedestrian Overcrossings San Ramon $4,840,000 Walnut Creek: Ygnacio Valley Rd Rehabilitation Walnut Creek $2,608,000 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TOTAL: $56,486,000

MARIN COUNTY
CMA Planning Activities
Planning Activities Base TAM $3,822,000
Federal Aid Secondary (FAS)
County of Marin receives FAS funding directly from Caltrans Safe Routes To School (SRTS)
Corte Madera: Paradise Dr Multi-Use Path (San Clement Dr to Seawolf Passage) Corte Madera $595,000 San Anselmo: San Anselmo Bike Spine San Anselmo $269,000 County Program
GGBHTD: San Rafael Bettini Transit Center GGBHTD $1,250,000 Novato: Nave Dr and Bel Marin Keys Blvd Preservation (for Novato Downtown SM Novato $1,450,000 San Anselmo: Sir Francis Drake Blvd Pavement Rehab and Crossing Imps San Anselmo $1,134,000 San Rafael: Francisco Blvd East Sidewalk Improvements San Rafael $2,100,000 Sausalito: US 101/Bridgeway/Gate 6 Bicycle Improvements Sausalito $250,000 MARIN COUNTY TOTAL: $10,870,000

NAPA COUNTY
CMA Planning Activities
Planning Activities Base NVTA $3,822,000
Federal Aid Secondary (FAS)
County of Napa receives FAS funding directly from Caltrans Safe Routes To School (SRTS)
NVTA: Napa County SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program NVTA $122,000 NVTA: Vine Trail Calistoga to St. Helena NVTA $393,000
County Program
NVTA: Vine Transit Bus Maintenance Facility NVTA $2,000,000 NVTA: Vine Trail Calistoga to St. Helena NVTA $1,813,000 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 2 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-2 1464
Attachment B-2
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 County Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
February 2024
OBAG 2 County Programs Project List
SPONSOR STP/CMAQ Other
OBAG 2 COUNTY PROGRAMS $376,562,000
MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-2
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 12/21/16-C 04/26/17-C 06/28/17-C 11/15/17-C 12/20/17-C 02/28/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 09/26/18-C 12/19/18-C 01/23/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 09/23/20-C 07/28/21-C 11/17/21-C 12/15/21-C 02/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 05/25/22-C 10/28/22-C 11/16/22-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 09/27/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C

PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE
NAPA COUNTY TOTAL: $8,150,000

SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY
CMA Planning Activities
Planning Activities Base SFCTA $3,997,000
Planning Activities - Supplemental SFCTA $1,900,000
Federal Aid Secondary (FAS)
County of San Francisco is entirely urban and therefore does not receive FAS funding Safe Routes To School (SRTS)
SFMTA: San Francisco SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program SFMTA $1,797,000 County Program
BART: Embarcadero Station New Northside Platform Elevator and Faregates BART $2,000,000 Caltrain: Peninsula Corridor Electrification Caltrain $11,188,000 SFMTA: Geary Bus Rapid Transit Phase 1 SFMTA $6,939,000 SFMTA: San Fransisco SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program - Supplemental SFMTA $1,016,000 SFMTA: Central Subway SFMTA $15,980,000
SFDPW: Better Market Street SFDPW $3,366,000
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TOTAL: $48,183,000

SAN MATEO COUNTY
CMA Planning Activities
Planning Activities Base C/CAG $3,822,000
Planning Activities - Supplemental C/CAG $1,512,000
Federal Aid Secondary (FAS)
County of San Mateo receives FAS funding directly from Caltrans Safe Routes To School (SRTS)
C/CAG: San Mateo SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program CCAG/COE $2,394,000 County Program
Atherton: James Ave Rehabilitation Atherton $251,000
Belmont: Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Belmont $467,000 Belmont: Ralston Ave Corridor Bike/Ped Improvements Belmont $1,000,000 Brisbane: Crocker Trail Commuter Connectivity Upgrades Brisbane $885,000 Brisbane: Tunnel Ave Rehabilitation Brisbane $137,000
Burlingame: Various Streets Resurfacing Burlingame $571,000 Burlingame: Broadway PDA Lighting Improvements Burlingame $720,000 Burlingame: Hoover School Area Sidewalk Improvements Burlingame $700,000 C/CAG: San Mateo SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program - Supplemental CCAG/COE $223,000 Colma: Mission Rd Bike/Ped Improvements Colma $625,000
Daly City: Various Streets Pavement Resurfacing and Slurry Seal Daly City $1,310,000 Daly City: Southgate Ave and School Street Safety Imps. Daly City $450,000 East Palo Alto: Various Streets Resurfacing East Palo Alto $416,000 Foster City: Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Foster City $441,000 Half Moon Bay: Poplar Street Complete Streets Half Moon Bay $1,202,000 Hillborough: Various Streets Resurfacing Hillsborough $408,000 Menlo Park: Santa Cruz and Middle Avenues Rehabilitation Menlo Park $647,000 Millbrae: Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Millbrae $387,000 Millbrae: Park Blvd, San Anselmo Ave, & Santa Teresa Way Imps. Millbrae $347,000 Pacifica: Citywide Curb Ramp Replacements Pacifica $400,000 Pacifica: Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Pacifica $671,000 Pacifica: Palmetto Sidewalk Improvements Pacifica $330,000 Pacifica: Sharp Park Priority Development Area Pedestrian Imps Pacifica $1,000,000 Portola Valley: Various Streets Resurfacing Portola Valley $201,000 Redwood City: Twin Dolphin Parkway Overlay Redwood City $1,266,000 San Bruno: Huntington Transit Corridor Bicycle/Pedestrian and Related Imps San Bruno $914,000 San Bruno: Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation San Bruno $673,000 San Carlos: Cedar and Brittan Ave Pavement Rehabilitation San Carlos $575,000 San Carlos: Ped Enhancements Arroyo/Cedar and Hemlock/Orange San Carlos $500,000 San Mateo: Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation San Mateo $1,593,000 San Mateo: Laurie Meadows Ped/Bike Safety Improvements San Mateo $987,000 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 3 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-2 1465
Attachment B-2
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 County Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
February 2024
OBAG 2 County Programs Project List
SPONSOR STP/CMAQ Other
OBAG 2 COUNTY PROGRAMS $376,562,000
MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-2
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 12/21/16-C 04/26/17-C 06/28/17-C 11/15/17-C 12/20/17-C 02/28/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 09/26/18-C 12/19/18-C 01/23/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 09/23/20-C 07/28/21-C 11/17/21-C 12/15/21-C 02/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 05/25/22-C 10/28/22-C 11/16/22-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 09/27/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C

PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE
San Mateo County: Canada Rd and Edgewood Rd Resurfacing San Mateo County $892,000 San Mateo County: Countywide Pavement Maintenance San Mateo County $1,072,000 South San Francisco: Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation South San Francisco $1,027,000 South San Francisco: Grand Boulevard Initiative Complete Street Imps South San Francisco $1,000,000 Woodside: Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation Woodside $242,000 Woodside: Woodside Pathway Phase 3 Woodside $136,000
Unprogrammed balance TBD $151,000
SAN MATEO COUNTY TOTAL: $32,545,000

SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CMA Planning Activities
Planning Activities Base VTA $6,078,000
Planning Activities - Supplemental VTA $4,822,000
Federal Aid Secondary (FAS)
Santa Clara County: Uvas Rd Rehabilitation Santa Clara County $1,701,000 Safe Routes To School (SRTS)
Campbell: Eden Ave Sidewalk Improvements Campbell $555,000 Cupertino: McClellan Rd Separated Bike Lane Cupertino $1,000,000 Los Gatos: Los Gatos Creek Trail to Highway 9 Trailhead Connection Los Gatos $1,258,000 San Jose: Mount Pleasant Schools Area Pedestrian & Bicycle Safety Imps. San Jose $1,000,000 Santa Clara: Santa Clara Schools Access Improvements Santa Clara $1,146,000 Sunnyvale: Homestead Rd at Homestead High School Ped & Bike Imps. Sunnyvale $1,000,000 Sunnyvale: Pedestrian and Bicyclist Infrastructure Improvements Sunnyvale $919,000 County Program
Campbell: Campbell PDA Enhancements Campbell $550,000
Campbell: Winchester Boulevard Overlay Campbell $554,000 Campbell: Harriet Ave Sidewalk Project Campbell $447,328 Cupertino: Pavement Management Program Cupertino $769,000 Cupertino: Stevens Creek Boulevard Class IV Bike Lanes Cupertino $807,000 Gilroy: Downtown Monterey St Rehabilitation Gilroy $1,028,000 Los Altos: Fremont Ave Asphalt Concrete Overlay Los Altos $336,000 Los Gatos: Los Gatos Creek Trail to Highway 9 Trailhead Connection Los Gatos $5,278,000 Los Gatos: Shannon Rd Complete Streets Los Gatos $940,100 Milpitas: Various Streets Resurfacing Milpitas $1,609,000 Morgan Hill: East Dunne Ave Pavement Rehabilitation Morgan Hill $857,000 Mountain View: Shoreline Boulevard Pathway Improvements Mountain View $1,996,000 Mountain View: West Middlefield Road Improvements Mountain View $1,136,000 Palo Alto: Adobe Creek/Highway 101 Bicycle Pedestrian Bridge Palo Alto $4,350,000 Palo Alto: North Ventura Coordinated Area Plan Palo Alto $638,000 Palo Alto: Various Streets Resurfacing Palo Alto $1,009,000 San Jose: Downtown San Jose Mobility, Streetscape, and Public Life Plan San Jose $813,000 San Jose: East Side Alum Rock (east of 680) Urban Village Plan San Jose $400,000 San Jose: Julian & St. James Livable Streets Couplet Conversion San Jose $2,067,572 San Jose: McKee Road Vision Zero Priority Safety Corridor Improvements San Jose $8,623,000 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 4 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-2 1466
Attachment B-2
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 County Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
February 2024
OBAG 2 County Programs Project List
SPONSOR STP/CMAQ Other
OBAG 2 COUNTY PROGRAMS $376,562,000
MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-2
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 12/21/16-C 04/26/17-C 06/28/17-C 11/15/17-C 12/20/17-C 02/28/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 09/26/18-C 12/19/18-C 01/23/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 09/23/20-C 07/28/21-C 11/17/21-C 12/15/21-C 02/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 05/25/22-C 10/28/22-C 11/16/22-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 09/27/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C

PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE
San Jose: Various Streets Pavement Rehabilitation San Jose $14,597,000 San Jose: Tully Road Vision Zero Priority Safety Corridor Improvements San Jose $8,599,000 San Jose: West San Carlos Urban Village Streetscape Improvements San Jose $3,582,000 Santa Clara: Streets & Roads Preservation Santa Clara $2,356,000 Santa Clara County: Capitol Expressway Rehabilitation Santa Clara County $5,000,000 Santa Clara County: Circulation and Mobility Element Santa Clara County $450,000 Santa Clara County: McKean Rd Pavement Rehabilitiation Santa Clara County $1,151,000 Saratoga: Citywide Master Plan for Bicycle and Sidewalks Saratoga $443,000 Saratoga: Prospect Rd Complete Streets Saratoga $1,075,000 Saratoga: Saratoga Village Crosswalks & Sidewalks Rehabilitation Saratoga $338,000 Sunnyvale: Bernardo Avenue Bicycle Underpass - EIR Sunnyvale $500,000 Sunnyvale: East Sunnyvale Area Sense of Place Improvements Sunnyvale $1,701,000 Sunnyvale: Fair Oaks Avenue Bikeway - Phase 2 Sunnyvale $782,000 Sunnyvale: Java Drive Road Diet & Bike Lanes Sunnyvale $500,000 Sunnyvale: Lawrence Station Area Sidewalks & Bike Facilities Sunnyvale $500,000 Sunnyvale: Peery Park Sense of Place Improvements Sunnyvale $2,686,000 Sunnyvale: Traffic Signal Upgrades Sunnyvale $2,566,000 VTA/Milpitas: Montague Exwy Pedestrian Overcrossing at Milpitas BART VTA/Milpitas $3,560,000 SANTA CLARA COUNTY TOTAL: $104,073,000

SOLANO COUNTY
CMA Planning Activities
Planning Activities Base STA $3,822,000
Planning Activities - Supplemental STA $3,039,000
Federal Aid Secondary (FAS)
Solano County: County Roads Paving Solano County $506,000 Solano County: Farm to Market Phase 2 Imps Solano County $1,000,000 Safe Routes To School (SRTS)
Fairfield: Grange Middle School SRTS Imps Fairfield $260,000 STA: Countywide SRTS Non-Infrastructure Program STA $1,209,000 County Program
Fairfield: East Tabor Tolenas SR2S Sidewalk Gap Closure Fairfield $2,731,000 Fairfield: Cadenasso Dr Repaving Fairfield $1,394,000
Suisun City: Railroad Ave Repaving Suisun City $491,000 STA: Vacaville Jepson Parkway Phase 1B Bike Path STA $3,064,000 STA: Solano Mobility Call Center STA $1,537,000
Vacaville: Local Streets Overlay Vacaville $1,193,000
Vacaville: Bike/Ped Trail Imps at Fruitvale Rd, Briarwood Dr, Arlene Dr Vacaville $250,000 Vallejo: Sacramento St Rehabilitation Vallejo $681,000
SOLANO COUNTY TOTAL: $21,177,000

SONOMA COUNTY
CMA Planning Activities
Planning Activities Base SCTA $3,822,000
Planning Activities - Supplemental SCTA $1,178,000
Federal Aid Secondary (FAS)
Sonoma County: River Road Pavement Rehabilitation Sonoma County $3,264,000 Safe Routes To School (SRTS)
SCTA: Sonoma County Safe Routes To School (SRTS) SCTA $1,655,000 County Program
Cotati: E. Cotati Avenue Street Rehabilitation Cotati $675,000 Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 5 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-2 1467
Attachment B-2
MTC Resolution No. 4202
OBAG 2 County Programs
FY 2017-18 through FY 2021-22
February 2024
OBAG 2 County Programs Project List
SPONSOR STP/CMAQ Other
OBAG 2 COUNTY PROGRAMS $376,562,000
MTC Res. No. 4202 Attachment B-2
Adopted: 11/18/15-C
Revised: 07/27/16-C 12/21/16-C 04/26/17-C 06/28/17-C 11/15/17-C 12/20/17-C 02/28/18-C 05/23/18-C 06/27/18-C 09/26/18-C 12/19/18-C 01/23/19-C 06/26/19-C 09/25/19-C 11/20/19-C 02/26/20-C 09/23/20-C 07/28/21-C 11/17/21-C 12/15/21-C 02/23/22-C 04/27/22-C 05/25/22-C 10/28/22-C 11/16/22-C 05/24/23-C 06/28/23-C 07/26/23-C 09/27/23-C 12/20/23-C 02/28/24-C

PROJECT CATEGORY AND TITLE
Healdsburg: Healdsburg Avenue Road Diet Healdsburg $600,000 Petaluma: Petaluma Boulevard South Road Diet Petaluma $2,916,000 SMART: Petaluma SMART Pathway SMART $400,000
Rohnert Park: Various Streets Rehabilitation Rohnert Park $1,035,000 Santa Rosa: US 101 Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge Overcrossing Santa Rosa $1,418,000 Santa Rosa: Various Streets Rehabilitation Santa Rosa $1,655,000 Sebastopol: Bodega Avenue Bike Lanes and Pavement Rehabilitation Sebastopol $1,195,000 Sonoma (City) : New Fryer Creek Bicycle and Pedestrian Bridge Sonoma (City) $501,000 Sonoma County: Various County Roads Rehabilitation Sonoma County $2,600,000 Sonoma County: New Crocker Bridge Bike and Pedestrian Passage Sonoma County $1,809,000 Windsor: Windsor River Road at Windsor Road Intersection Imps Windsor $3,000,000 SONOMA COUNTY TOTAL: $27,723,000
OBAG 2 COUNTY PROGRAMS TOTAL: $376,562,000 $9,300,000
Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) 6 MTC Resolution No. 4202 Attachment B-2 1468

August 26, 2025
DocID #51258v1
Public Works
DATE: August 26, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria, PE, Public Works Director
Robert Armijo, PE, Deputy Public Works Director / City
Engineer
Hillal Hamdan, PE, Senior Civil Engineer
Subject: Resolution Authorizing Continued Participation in the StreetLight Data Program for Fiscal Year 2025–26
FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City of Richmond’s cost share for participation in the StreetLight Data subscription for fiscal year 2025–2026 is $35,472. This amount will be funded from the
appropriation of City’s allocation of Measure J
Transportation Sales Tax funds (Account String:
20236031-400263).

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) is
renewing its regional subscription to StreetLight Data
services for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025–26 and has prepared
Amendment No. 5 to Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) No. 80.09.02 to memorialize the updated costsharing commitments with participating jurisdictions. The City of Richmond has participated in the program since
FY 2022–23 and must execute the amendment to
continue accessing the service. City staff seeks City
Council approval of a resolution to appropriate funds in the Measure J Fund and authorizing the City Manager to
sign the MOU on behalf of the City.

AGENDA
REPORT
1469

August 26, 2025
DocID #51258v1
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution to APPROPRIATE funds in the amount of $35,472 in the Measure J Fund 2002; and
AUTHORIZE the City Manager or her designee to
execute Amendment No. 5 to Memorandum of
Understanding No. 80.09.02 with the Contra Costa
Transportation Authority for continued participation in the regional StreetLight Data subscription program for Fiscal Year 2025–26 – Public Works (Robert Armijo 510-620-
5477/Hillal Hamdan 510-621-1612).

DISCUSSION:

The City of Richmond has participated in a regional, multi-jurisdictional cost-sharing agreement for StreetLight Data subscription services since Fiscal Year (FY) 2022–23.

This effort, led by the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA), enables participating jurisdictions to access a countywide mobility analytics platform to support transportation planning, project evaluation, and funding pursuits.

StreetLight Data provides a powerful suite of tools that use location-based data from mobile devices and connected vehicles to analyze travel behavior across multiple modes and corridors. The data can be used to study traffic volumes, speeds, travel times, and origin-destination patterns—offering insights into how people and goods move throughout Contra Costa County. All data is anonymized and cannot be traced to individual users.

Amendment No. 5 to Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) No. 80.09.02 outlines updated cost shares for FY 2025–26 and renews access to the StreetLight Data platform for one additional year, consistent with the terms of Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 569 between CCTA and StreetLight Data, Inc.

For FY 2025–26, the City of Richmond’s share is $35,472, based on population. This amount will be funded through the City’s Measure J Transportation Sales Tax program, which supports congestion management and transportation planning initiatives.

StreetLight Data allows City staff to perform advanced traffic analysis and access large volumes of data across time periods, road segments, and geographies without needing to deploy pneumatic tube counters for each new inquiry. This has significantly reduced both the lead time and labor costs associated with traditional traffic data collection and has enabled more responsive evaluations of public requests, safety concerns, and capital project performance. It has also supported competitive applications for grant funding from programs such as the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) and Active Transportation Program (ATP).

The platform offers a cost-effective means to support Richmond’s Local Road Safety Plan, Bicycle and Pedestrian Action Plan, and other multimodal planning efforts. The 1470

August 26, 2025
DocID #51258v1
ability to conduct on-demand before-and-after studies also enhances the City’s ability to quantify project benefits.

Participation in the regional subscription is coordinated by CCTA, which provides procurement, contract management, and technical support. The terms of the MOU allow the City to withdraw from the MOU with 30 days written notice prior to the subscription’s renewal.

City staff recommends that the City Council approve the proposed resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 5 to MOU No. 80.09.02, thereby continuing Richmond’s participation in the countywide StreetLight Data subscription for Fiscal Year 2025–26. The City’s cost share of $35,472 will be funded through Measure J and will support efficient, data-informed decision-making for transportation planning and project delivery.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Amendment # 5 to the memorandum of understanding (MOU) 1471
AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO THE
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) 80.09.02

BETWEEN

CITY OF BRENTWOOD, CITY OF EL CERRITO, CITY OF LAFAYETTE, TOWN OF MORAGA, CITY OF OAKLEY,

CITY OF ORINDA, CITY OF PINOLE, CITY OF RICHMOND, CITY OF SAN PABLO, CITY OF WALNUT CREEK,

AND THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA,
AND

CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
FOR

THE STREETLIGHT DATA AND SERVICES SUBSCRIPTION AND COST-SHARING COMMITMENT This Amendment to MOU 80.09.02 commences on July 27, 2025, by and among the cities, town, and county listed immediately below, referred to herein individually as a “Jurisdiction” or collectively as a “Jurisdiction” or collectively as “Jurisdictions,” and the Contra Costa Transportation Authority, a transportation authority established under Public Utilities Code Sections 180000 et seq. (CCTA).

RECITALS
A. WHEREAS, this Amendment includes the Jurisdictions as shown below:

City of Brentwood
City of El Cerrito
City of Lafayette
Town of Moraga
City of Oakley
City of Orinda
City of Pinole
City of Richmond
City of San Pablo
City of Walnut Creek
County of Contra Costa
The Jurisdictions and CCTA are referred to herein collectively as the “Parties” or individually as a “Party.”
B. WHEREAS, CCTA entered into the contract with StreetLight Data, Inc. (StreetLight Data) for a one-year period, effective July 27, 2025, through July 26, 2026 (Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26) at a cost of $450,000; and
C. WHEREAS, on July 27, 2025, CCTA will exercise an option to renew the Subscription Order Form (Project Costs in the form of Services) for the first additional available one-year optional term (FY 2025-2026 included as Attachment A to this MOU), of two potential additional one-year terms both allowed in Amendment No. 1 with StreetLight Data entered into on July 27, 2024 at a collective cost-sharing total amount up to an annual cost of $452,428; and D. WHEREAS, on July 27, 2024, CCTA entered into Amendment No. 1 with StreetLight Data to renew the Subscription Order Form Project Costs (Services referred to as “the Project”) for an additional one-year term with an option to renew up to two additional one-year terms included 1472
as Attachment A to this MOU, governing access to and use of StreetLight Data products; and E. WHEREAS, as part of the Master Agreement and Subscription Order Project Costs, CCTA extended the ongoing customer services and technical support from StreetLight Data, as described in Exhibit A to Attachment A; and
F. WHEREAS, if additional jurisdictions desire to join the StreetLight Data subscription, the cost share for each current participating agencies will be adjusted accordingly to reflect the additional jurisdiction’s contributions.

Now, therefore, based on the recitals set forth above which are included as part of this Amendment, the Parties do hereby agree as follows:

Section 1, Project Costs is amended as follows:

The Parties have agreed to a cost-sharing model to cover the expense of the StreetLight Data services to be obtained by CCTA pursuant to the Subscription Order and Master Agreement (Attachment A) between StreetLight Data and CCTA. The total Projects cost for the fifth one-year of services is $450,000.

The Parties each agree to contribute the following updated amounts for the Project.

Agency Proportional
Share – Year 1
(2021-22)
Proportional
Share – Year 2
(2022-23)
Proportional
Share – Year 3
(2023-24)
Proportional
Share – Year 4
(2024-25)
Proportional
Share – Year 5
(2025-26)
CCTA $360,000 $335,000 $327,000 $261,328
(57%)
$259,926
(57%)
City of
Brentwood
n/a n/a n/a $16,700 $20,531
City of
Richmond
n/a n/a $47,500 $29,000 $35,472
City of
Walnut
Creek
n/a $40,000 $38,000 $17,900 $21,836
City of
Oakley
n/a n/a $19,000 $11,800 $14,622
City of El
Cerrito
n/a n/a $9,500 $6,600 $8,076
City of San
Pablo
$15,000 $15,000 $14,200 $8,000 $9,839
City of
Lafayette
$10,000 $10,000 $9,500 $6,400 $7,824
Town of
Moraga
$5,000 $5,000 $4,700 $4,400 $5,195
1473
City of
Pinole
$5,000 $5,000 $4,700 $4,700 $5,702
City of
Orinda
$2,500 $2,500 $2,400 $3,000 $6,043
County of
Contra
Costa
n/a n/a $26,000 $44,700 $54,934
TOTAL $502,500 $502,500 $550,000 $452,428 $450,000
Source of (January 2025) Population Served by Subscription Services for FY 2025-26 cost-sharing:
https://dof.ca.gov/forecasting/demographics/estimates-e1/ Section 2, Continuing Participation and Cost-Sharing is amended as follows:

The services from StreetLight Data are renewed for one year (Option Year 1 of 2 Option Years Possible), from July 27, 2025, through June 26, 2026. This year is the second year of the subscription commitments as part of Amendment No. 1. Any extension of services and associated financial commitment beyond the initial term shall be memorialized in the form of a written amendment to this MOU.

Section 6, Term and Termination, is amended as follows:

The Parties understand and agree that the one-year renewal of the StreetLight Data subscription will begin July 27, 2025, and will terminate July 27, 2026, unless further extended through an amendment to this MOU. Jurisdictions may opt out of this MOU with 30 days written notice by mutual written agreement of the Parties wishing to move forward prior to the Project subscription termination date.

All other provisions of the MOU shall remain in effect. 1474
Contra Costa Transportation Authority:

By: __________________________
Title: Aaron Meadows, Chair
Date: __________________________
Attest By: __________________________
Title: Tarienne Grover, Clerk of the Board
Contra Costa Transportation Authority (as to Form and Legality):

By: __________________________
Title: Fennemore LLP, Authority Counsel
Date: __________________________
All notices shall be made to the following address and point of contact:

To: Contra Costa Transportation Authority
2999 Oak Road, Suite 100
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Attention: Colin Clarke, Senior Transportation Planner
Email: [email protected]
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 1475
5 City of Brentwood:

By: __________________________
Title: Tim Ogden, City Manager
Date: _______________
All notices shall be made to the following address and point of contact:

To: City of Brentwood
150 City Park Way
Brentwood, CA 94513
Attention: Anjul Pillai
Email: [email protected]
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 1476
6 City of San Pablo:

By: __________________________
Title: Matt Rodriguez, City Manager
Date: _______________
All notices shall be made to the following address and point of contact:

To: City of San Pablo
1000 Gateway Ave.

San Pablo, CA 94806
Attention: Allan Panganiban, Public Works Director & City Engineer Email: [email protected]
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 1477
7 City of Lafayette:

By: __________________________
Title: Niroop Srivatsa, City Manager
Date: _______________
All notices shall be made to the following address and point of contact:

To: City of Lafayette
3675 Mt. Diablo Blvd., Suite 210
Lafayette, CA 94549
Attention: Mike Moran, Director of Engineering and Public Works Email: [email protected]
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 1478
8 Town of Moraga:

By: __________________________
Title: Scott Mitnick, Town Manager
Date: _______________
All notices shall be made to the following address and point of contact:

To: Town of Moraga
329 Rheem Blvd.

Moraga, CA 94556
Attention: Brian Horn, Principal Planner
Email: [email protected]
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 1479
9 City of Orinda:

By: __________________________
Title: David Biggs, City Manager
Date: _______________
All notices shall be made to the following address and point of contact:

To: City of Orinda
22 Orinda Way
Orinda, CA 94563
Attention: Scott Christie
Email: [email protected]
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 1480
10 City of Pinole:

By: __________________________
Title: Andrew Murray, City Manager
Date: _______________
All notices shall be made to the following address and point of contact:

To: City of Pinole
2131 Pear Street
Pinole, CA 94564
Attention: Heba El-Guindy, Public Works Director
Email: [email protected]
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 1481
11 City of Walnut Creek:

By: __________________________
Title: Dan Buckshi, City Manager
Date: _______________
All notices shall be made to the following address and point of contact:

To: City of Walnut Creek
1666 N. Main Street
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Attention: Briana Byrne, Associate Traffic Engineer
Email: [email protected]
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 1482
12 City of Richmond:

By: __________________________
Title: Sasha Curl, City Manager
Date: _______________
All notices shall be made to the following address and point of contact:

To: City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Attention: Robert Armijo, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer Email: [email protected]
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 1483
13 City of Oakley:

By: __________________________
Title: Joshua McMurray, City Manager
Date: _______________
All notices shall be made to the following address and point of contact:

To: City of Oakley
3231 Main Street
Oakley, CA 94561
Attention: Billilee Saengchalern
Email: [email protected]
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 1484
14 City of El Cerrito:

By: __________________________
Title: Yvetteh Ortiz, City Engineer/Public Works Director Date: _______________
All notices shall be made to the following address and point of contact:

To: City of El Cerrito
10890 San Pablo Avenue
El Cerrito, CA 94530
Attention: Jarrett Mullen, Sustainable Transportation Program Manager Email: [email protected]
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 1485
15 County of Contra Costa:

By: __________________________
Title: Warren Lai, Public Works Director
Date: _______________
All notices shall be made to the following address and point of contact:

To: County of Contra Costa
255 Glacier Drive
Martinez, CA 94553
Attention: Monish Sen, Senior Civil Engineer
Email: [email protected]
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE HAS BEEN INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.] 1486
Amendment #1 to StreetLight InSight® Subscription Order Form THIS AMENDMENT #1 is entered into as of the date of last signature below (the, “Effective Date”), Between:

StreetLight Data, Inc. a Delaware
corporation, located at 4 Embarcadero
Center, #3800, San Francisco, CA 94105
and Contra Costa Transportation Authority,
located at 2999 Oak Road Suite 100, Walnut
Creek, California 94597
(hereinafter referred to as “StreetLight”) (hereinafter referred to as “Customer”) of the First Part of the Second Part
WHEREAS the parties hereto entered into a StreetLight InSight® Subscription Order Form, and corresponding Master Data Access Agreement, Effective July 27, 2021, which together with any duly executed amendments shall hereinafter be referred to as the “Agreement”; AND WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement as set out below.

NOW THEREFORE in consideration of the mutual covenants herein contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

1. The Term Section of the Master Data Access Agreement is extended through July 26, 2025, and shall automatically renew for up to two additional one-year terms, unless either party delivers to the other, not less than sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of the then current term, written notice of such party’s intent to not renew the Agreement.

2. The Agreement is amended to include the Subscription Order attached hereto, Subscription Order 2024-2025.

3. Except as otherwise provided for above, all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.

StreetLight Data, Inc. Contra Costa Transportation Authority SIGNATURE: SIGNATURE:

NAME: NAME:

TITLE: TITLE:

DATE: DATE:

ATTEST
Tarienne Grover, Clerk of the Board

APPROVED AS TO FORM
Fennemore Wendel, Authority Counsel
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 569
Newell Arnerich
Chair
Aaron Moser
Vice President
E-SIGNED by Amara Morrison
on 2024-07-29 19:02:57 GMT
July 29, 2024
E-SIGNED by Newell Arnerich
on 2024-07-29 17:59:35 GMT
July 26, 2024
E-SIGNED by Aaron Moser
on 2024-07-26 18:49:27 GMT
E-SIGNED by Tarienne Grover
on 2024-07-29 18:14:32 GMT
1487
StreetLight InSight® Subscription Order 2024-2025
This StreetLight InSight® Subscription Order Document (the “Subscription Order” or “Order”) and the corresponding StreetLight Data Master Data Access Agreement (the “Agreement”) between StreetLight Data, Inc. (“StreetLight”) and Customer (as defined below) is entered into as of the date of last signature below (“Effective Date”) and governs Customer’s access to and use of the Data Products. Undefined capitalized terms used in this Subscription Order will have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

Customer Legal Name: Billing Contact Name:

Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) John Hoang Entity Type: Billing Email:

Public Agency [email protected]
State of Incorporation Billing Address
California 2999 Oak Road, Suite 100
Walnut Creek, California 94597
United States
Under the terms of the Master Data Access Agreement, Effective July 27, 2021, of which this Subscription Order is a part, Customer agrees to license and StreetLight agrees to provide access to the following Data Products in the indicated quantity and at the indicated pricing in U.S. Dollars:

Subscription Services
Enterprise Subscription Package # of Units Product Price Tax TOTAL Solution Package – Enterprise
(Formerly MultiMode)
632 TAZs $452,428.00 $0.00 $664,000.00
Optional Service Credits TBD Credits $100,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 Onsight Training 2 Sessions $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
StreetLight Insight® API Access $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
DISCOUNT $-211,572.00
USD $452,428.00 $0.00 $452,428.00
Product Special Terms
Users of Customer, Users of Customer’s participating local cities and agencies, and up to thirty (50) Users of Customer’s Named Consultants, may create an unlimited number of Zones within Contra Costa County, California, and may include pass-through Zones to capture trips originating or ending outside of the authorized geographic area for governmental transportation planning and operational analysis.

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, Customer represents and warrants: a) it has the full power, capacity and authority to enter into and perform this Agreement; and b) its performance of this Agreement does not violate or conflict in any material way with any agreement to which Customer is a party.

StreetLight Data acknowledges that Customer will be providing access to the Data Products and Subscribed Output to its member agencies. Customer will be responsible for ensuring that each member agency agrees, in writing, to the restrictions on use and access set forth in Section 2 of the Agreement.

Customer may request additional application support services via email. StreetLight will respond with the number of service credits and price of the additional services. StreetLight will begin work and invoice Customer on Customer’s email approval.

Customer Input Files
Customer will provide input Zones containing the boundaries of the Zones and directionality designation (if necessary) either via spatial files or via the StreetLight InSight® Web Application. A Zone can be a road segment, a TAZ or any other geospatial shape as defined by Customer. StreetLight may modify Zones to improve Metric results.
1488
Delivery
Delivery via StreetLight InSight® Web Application, and API.

Term
As of the July 27, 2024 for a period of one (1) year, and shall automatically renew for up to two additional one-year terms, unless either party delivers to the other, not less than sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of the then current term, written notice of such party’s intent to not renew the Agreement.

Payment Terms
Payment due within thirty (30) days of the Effective Date. Payment is accepted by check or ACH/EFT.

StreetLight Data Preferred Payment Method: ACH/EFT
Bank of America
901 Main Street, Dallas, TX 75202
Bank Routing Number (ACH): 111000012
Bank Routing Number (wires): 026009593
Bank Account Name: Streetlight Data, Inc.

Bank Account Number: 4451744791
Remittance Notification Email: [email protected]
Please remit payment, if by check to:

StreetLight Data Inc
P.O. Box 744733
Los Angeles, CA 90074-4733
Notices
Any notices under this Agreement will be directed, if to Customer, to the Contact listed above, and if to StreetLight, at:

ATTN: Legal Department,
StreetLight Data, Inc.
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3800,
San Francisco, CA 94105
Email: [email protected]

CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT HAS READ THIS SUBSCRIPTION ORDER DOCUMENT AND

THE CORRESPONDING AGREEMENT, AND UNDERSTANDS AND AGREES TO BE LEGALLY BOUND BY THEIR TERMS.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Subscription Order has been executed by the parties through their duly authorized officers.
1489
Planning Committee STAFF REPORT
Meeting Date: July 10, 2025
Subject StreetLight Data Subscription Cost-Share – Authorization to Renew Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 569 with
StreetLight Data, Inc. (StreetLight Data) and to Execute Amendment No. 5 to Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
No. 80.09.02 with the Cities/Town Participating in the CostShare for the StreetLight Data Subscription for Fiscal Year (FY) 2025-26
Summary of Issues This proposal will enter into Amendment No. 5 to MOU No.

80.09.02 between the Authority and each jurisdiction
participating in the cost-share for the StreetLight Data services license for FY 2025-26 (summarized in a table in Attachment A).

Recommendations Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to renew Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 569 with StreetLight Data for a
Countywide Multimodal Regional License (Multi-Domain
License) for an additional one-year term (FY 2025-26), execute Amendment No. 5 to MOU No. 80.09.02 between the
Authority and each jurisdiction participating in the cost-share for the StreetLight Data Multi-Domain License for FY 2025-26 and allow the Executive Director or designee to make any nonsubstantive changes to the language.

Staff Contact Colin Clarke
Financial Implications The Authority's estimated share is included in the FY 2025-26 Congestion Management Agency (CMA) Budget with the
proportional share to be provided by each participating 1490
Planning Committee STAFF REPORT
July 10, 2025

jurisdiction during Quarter 1 of FY 2025-26.

Options 1. The Authority Board may choose to approve staff's recommendation.

2. The Authority Board may choose to not approve staff's recommendation.

Attachments (Attachment A
is Revised. See PC Packet
dated 7/10/25 for
Attachment B)
A. Amendment No. 5 to MOU No. 80.09.02 – Revised
B. Executed Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 569
Changes from Committee None
Background
In July 2021, the Authority initiated a multi-jurisdiction subscription to the StreetLight MultiDomain License for one year (FY 2021-22), through execution of Agreement No. 569, with an option to renew for up to two additional one-year terms for a maximum total of three years.

The StreetLight platform is a Location-Based Big Data (geospatial data) and provides services that can be used to inform transportation planning and an analysis tool to support projects such as: core transportation behavior, traffic analysis, traffic count, before-and-after analysis, operations and congestion management, and other transportation analyses. The Authority Board subsequently approved renewal of the subscription services for Year 2 (FY 2022-23) and Year 3 (FY 2023-24). In July 2024, the Authority Board approved the continuation of the StreetLight subscription by entering into Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 569 for a period of one year (FY 2024-25) in the amount of $452,428 with the option to renew for up to two additional one-year terms (FYs 2025-26 and 2026-27).

In July 2025, the Authority Board will consider whether to exercise an option to renew the Subscription Order Form (Project Costs in the form of Services) for the first additional available one-year optional term at a collective annual cost-sharing total amount of $450,000.

In parallel with the StreetLight subscription, the Authority entered into MOU No. 80.09.02 with each jurisdiction opting in to participate in the cost-share arrangement from FY 2021-22 1491
Planning Committee STAFF REPORT
July 10, 2025

through FY 2023-24, which were included as part of subsequent Amendment Nos. 1-3, accounting for each year of cost-share as well as adjustments to the number of participating jurisdictions. For FY 2025-26, the agencies participating in the cost-sharing agreement will include the cities of Brentwood, El Cerrito, Lafayette, Oakley, Orinda, Pinole, Richmond, San Pablo and Walnut Creek, Town of Moraga, and Contra Costa County, totaling 11 jurisdictions in addition to the Authority.

The proposed cost-share breakdown is based on population (January 2025) and the costshare summary for FY 2025-26, including the Authority and each participating jurisdiction is included in the table in Attachment A.

Upon approval from the Authority Board, each of the participating jurisdictions will enter into Amendment No. 5 to MOU No. 80.09.02 with the Authority (Attachment A), which will identify the cost-share as shown in Attachment A. This will be the fifth year of cost-sharing in a multi-jurisdiction subscription.

Staff seeks authorization for the Chair to renew Amendment No. 1 to Agreement No. 569 with StreetLight Data for a Countywide Multi-Domain License for an additional one-year term (FY 2025-26), execute Amendment No. 5 to MOU No. 80.09.02 between the Authority and each jurisdiction participating in the cost-share for the StreetLight Data Multi-Domain License for FY 2025-26 and allow the Executive Director or designee to make any non-substantive changes to the language.
1492
DocID #51259v1
RESOLUTION NO. __25

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,

CALIFORNIA, TO APPROPRIATE FUNDS AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AMENDMENT NO. 5 TO MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING NO. 80.09.02 WITH THE CONTRA COSTA TRANSPORTATION

AUTHORITY FOR CONTINUED PARTICIPATION IN THE STREETLIGHT DATA SUBSCRIPTION PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025–26
WHEREAS, the Contra Costa Transportation Authority (CCTA) administers a countywide subscription to StreetLight Data services to support local and regional transportation planning and analysis using anonymized location-based mobility data; and WHEREAS, the City of Richmond has participated in the StreetLight Data cost-sharing agreement since Fiscal Year 2022–23 through a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU No.

80.09.02) with CCTA and other participating jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, StreetLight Data enables staff to conduct advanced traffic analysis, evaluate travel behavior across time and geography, and access large volumes of data to support capital planning, grant applications, and public engagement efforts; and WHEREAS, the platform reduces the City’s reliance on traditional pneumatic tube counters by enabling staff to perform on-demand analysis without requiring field deployment; and
WHEREAS, all data provided by StreetLight is anonymized and aggregated to protect individual privacy while still offering valuable insights into traffic patterns and multimodal travel behavior; and
WHEREAS, CCTA intends to renew its agreement with StreetLight Data, Inc. for Fiscal Year 2025–26, and has prepared Amendment No. 5 to MOU No. 80.09.02 to reflect updated jurisdictional cost shares and continued program participation; and WHEREAS, the City’s share of the StreetLight Data subscription cost for Fiscal Year 2025–26 is $35,472, which is to be funded by the City’s allocation of Measure J Transportation Sales Tax funds; and
WHEREAS, City staff recommends the City Council appropriate funds by the City’s allocation of Measure J Transportation Sales Tax funds; and WHEREAS, sufficient appropriations are available in the City’s FY 2025–26 budget to fund the City's participation without requiring any additional budget authorization; and

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, AS FOLLOWS:
1493
DocID #51259v1
SECTION 1. The recitals above are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference.

SECTION 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute Amendment No. 5 to Memorandum of Understanding No. 80.09.02 with the Contra Costa Transportation Authority for continued participation in the StreetLight Data subscription program for Fiscal Year 2025–26.

SECTION 3. The City’s share of $35,472 shall be paid from Measure J – Transportation Planning funds, Account String: 220236031-400263.

SECTION 4. The City Council finds that participation in the regional StreetLight Data subscription program enhances the City’s ability to conduct data-driven planning, efficiently monitor transportation conditions, and support high-quality infrastructure investment decisions.

SECTION 5. This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption.
**********************
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution of the Council of the City of Richmond was duly passed and adopted at a meeting thereof held August 26, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSENT:

ABSTENTION:
__________________________________________

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney
1494

August 26, 2025
DocID #50934v1
Public Works
DATE: August 26, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Daniel Chavarria PE, Director of Public Works
Robert Armijo, PE, Deputy Director of Public Works / City Engineer
Dan Santos, Assistant Engineer
Subject: Piggyback Contract with Precision Emprise LLC dba Precision Concrete Cutting for On-Call Concrete Repair Services
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funding for concrete repairs is available through various programmed Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects,
including the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Sidewalk Improvements and Paving Programs. Additional funding
sources include grant funds, Gas Tax, and Measure J
revenues. The initial three-year contract amount of $2,000,000 is supported by existing budgeted funds and does not require additional appropriation. Optional extensions may be
approved by the City Manager, subject to funding availability at the time of extension.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

None

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The City of Richmond must maintain public infrastructure to ensure safety, accessibility, and compliance with ADA and other regulations. On-call concrete repair services are needed to perform “make-safe” repairs that address trip hazards, noncompliant curb ramps, and damage from tree roots in a timely and efficient manner.

AGENDA
REPORT
1495

August 26, 2025
DocID #50934v1

RECOMMENDED
ACTION:

ADOPT a resolution awarding a three-year contract to
Precision Emprise LLC, dba Precision Concrete Cutting, for on-call concrete repair services in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 through August 28, 2028. The City Manager may approve up to two optional one-year extensions at a not-toexceed amount of $200,000 per year, subject to budget availability - Public Works (Robert Armijo 510-620-5477 / Dan Santos 510-620-6645).

DISCUSSION:

The City of Richmond requires on-call concrete repair services to eliminate trip hazards caused by tree root uplift, support facilities maintenance, and install accessible curb ramps at selected locations in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). These services often involve urgent “make-safe” repairs to address conditions that present immediate risks to public safety.

The City’s current agreement for on-call concrete repair services expired on June 30, 2025. Due to the unpredictable nature and scattered locations of repairs needed, an oncall contract remains the most efficient method for delivering this work. The contract scope may also support Capital Improvement Projects (CIPs), including the ADA Sidewalk and Curbs Project and Pavement Management 2025.

Precision Emprise LLC, dba Precision Concrete Cutting (PCC), specializes in removing sidewalk trip hazards and repairing concrete infrastructure in the public right-of-way.

City staff evaluates damaged locations and determines whether conditions warrant “make-safe” treatment—such as targeted shaving—or full removal and replacement.

These repairs are often coordinated with adjacent CIP work and prioritized accordingly.

The Richmond Municipal Code section 2.52.330 allows the City to procure supplies or services without formal bidding when the purchase is made pursuant to a contract awarded by another public agency through a competitive process (commonly referred to as a “piggyback” procurement), provided that the contract complies with City purchasing procedures. On April 15, 2025, the Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit (CSIU), operating as the Keystone Purchasing Network (KPN), entered into a competitively bid national contract with Precision Emprise LLC (KPN Contract #KPN-202201-04), valid through June 30, 2026. KPN is a national purchasing cooperative that awards contracts through competitive bidding procedures that satisfy the City of Richmond’s Purchasing Ordinance. The City proposes to utilize this agreement to retain Precision Emprise LLC at the rates and terms established by KPN.

If approved, work is anticipated to begin in Fiscal Year 2025–26. 1496

August 26, 2025
DocID #50934v1
City staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution awarding a three-year contract to Precision Emprise LLC, dba Precision Concrete Cutting, for on-call concrete repair services in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 through August 28, 2028, and authorizing two optional one-year extensions at $200,000 per year, which may be exercised by the City Manager, provided funding is available and appropriated in future budgets.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED
Attachment 1 – Resolution
Attachment 2 – Construction Agreement with Precision Emprise LLC 1497
DocID #50933v1
RESOLUTION NO. XX-25

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND,

CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN

AGREEMENT WITH PRECISION EMPRISE LLC, DBA PRECISION

CONCRETE CUTTING, FOR ON-CALL CONCRETE REPAIR SERVICES

THROUGH A PIGGYBACK PROCUREMENT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $2,000,000 THROUGH AUGUST 28, 2028, AND TO APPROVE UP TO

TWO OPTIONAL ONE-YEAR EXTENSIONS IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO
EXCEED $200,000 PER YEAR, SUBJECT TO FUNDING AVAILABILITY WHEREAS, the City of Richmond is responsible for maintaining public infrastructure in a safe, accessible, and compliant condition, including sidewalks, curbs, gutters, and curb ramps;
WHEREAS, the City has an ongoing need to perform on-call concrete repairs to address trip hazards, sidewalk uplift from tree roots, non-compliant curb ramps, and other hazards in the public right-of-way;
WHEREAS, Precision Emprise LLC, dba Precision Concrete Cutting, specializes in “make-safe” concrete repairs including sidewalk shaving and trip hazard removal; WHEREAS, the City’s current agreement for on-call concrete repair services expired on June 30, 2025, and a new contract is needed to ensure continuity of services; WHEREAS, the City desires to utilize a competitively bid cooperative purchasing contract awarded by the Keystone Purchasing Network (KPN Contract #KPN-202201-04) to enter into an agreement with Precision Emprise LLC.

WHEREAS, the Richmond Municipal Code section 2.52.330 allows the City to procure supplies or services without formal bidding when the purchase is made pursuant to a contract awarded by another public agency through a competitive process (commonly referred to as a “piggyback” procurement), provided that the contract complies with City purchasing procedures;
WHEREAS, the Keystone Purchasing Network contract meets the competitive bidding requirements, and the City’s intended use of that contract complies with the Richmond Municipal Code 2.52.330;
WHEREAS, staff recommends entering into an agreement with Precision Emprise LLC for an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 through August 28, 2028, and authorizing the City Manager to approve up to two optional one-year extensions, each in an amount not to exceed $200,000, subject to funding availability; 1498
DocID #50933v1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richmond, as follows:

Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and this City Council hereby so finds and determines.

Section 2. The City Manager is authorized to execute an agreement with Precision Emprise LLC, dba Precision Concrete Cutting, for on-call concrete repair services in an amount not to exceed $2,000,000 through August 28, 2028, and to approve up to two optional one-year extensions, each in an amount not to exceed $200,000, subject to availability of funds, the terms and pricing in the KPN cooperative contract, and approval as to form by the City Attorney.

Section 3. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. **********************
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution of the Council of the City of Richmond was duly passed and adopted at a meeting thereof held August 26, 2025, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:

ABSTENTION:

ABSENT:
__________________________________________

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney
1499

CITY OF RICHMOND

STANDARD CONTRACT
Department: City Project Manager:

City Project Manager E-mail: City Project Manager Phone No:

Vendor No: Contract No:

Description of Services:

The parties to this STANDARD CONTRACT do mutually agree and promise as follows:

1. Parties. The parties to this Contract are the City of Richmond, a municipal corporation (“the City”), and the following named Contractor:

Contractor Name:

Street Address:

City, State, Zip Code:

Contact Person:

Telephone: Email:

Business License No:
☐ A California corporation, ☐ limited liability corporation ☐ general partnership, ☐ limited partnership, ☐ individual, ☐ non-profit corporation, ☐ individual dba as [specify:] ____________________ ☐ other [specify:] _______________________________

2. Term. The effective date of this Contract is _______________________ and terminates _________________ unless terminated earlier as set forth herein.

3. Payment Limit. City’s total payments to Contractor under this Contract shall not exceed $______________ (“Contract Payment Limit”) unless a Contract Amendment has been approved by the City Council or City Manager. If this amount includes a contingency, Contractor acknowledges that any use of such contingency shall be for work beyond the original scope of services and requires prior written authorization by the City. If noted below, Compensation for work done under this Contract, shall not exceed as follows:

FY _________ total compensation shall not exceed $_________________ FY _________ total compensation shall not exceed $_________________ FY _________ total compensation shall not exceed $_________________

4. Contractor’s Obligations. Contractor agrees to perform all work at its own cost and expense, to furnish all labor, tools, equipment, materials, except as otherwise specified, in accordance with the Service Plan set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

5. City Obligations. City shall make payments to the Contractor in accordance with the Payment Provisions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein.

Public Works Dan Santos [email protected] (510) 620-6645 9104 On-call concrete shaving of concrete slabs using precision cutting equipment to remove vertical displacements from ¼ inch to 2 inches, achieving a flush, safe walking surface. Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete Cutting 335 Beach Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Joseph Ortega (650) 576-4303 [email protected] 10232474 August 28, 2025 August 28, 2028 2,000,000.00 1500

6. Authorized Representatives and Notices. This Contract is subject to the Authorized Representatives and Notices Provisions (Exhibit C), attached hereto and incorporated herein.

7. General Conditions. This Contract is subject to the General Conditions (Exhibit D), which are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

8. Special Conditions. This Contract is subject to the Special Conditions (Exhibit E) (if any), which are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

9. Insurance Provisions. This Contract is subject to the Insurance Provisions (Exhibit F), which are attached hereto and incorporated herein.

10. Sanctuary City Compliance Statement. This Contract is subject to the Sanctuary City Compliance Statement (Exhibit G), which is attached hereto and incorporated herein.

11. Signatures. These signatures attest the parties' agreement hereto:

CITY OF RICHMOND,
a municipal corporation [BUSINESS NAME]
(* The Corporation Chairperson of the Board, President, or Vice President should sign below)
By: _________________________ By: ___________________________ Title: ________________________ Title: __________________________ Date Signed: _________________ Date Signed: ___________________ I hereby certify that this Contract (* The Corporation Chief Financial Officer or Assistant has been approved by City Council Treasurer, or Secretary or Assistant Secretary should or the City Manager. sign below)
By: _________________________ By: ___________________________ City Clerk Title: __________________________
Date Signed: ____________________
Approved as to form:
(NOTE: Pursuant to California Corporations Code Section By: _________________________ 313, if Contractor is a corporation or nonprofit organization, City Attorney this Contract (1) must be signed by (a) the Chairperson of the Board, President, or Vice-President and (b) the
Chief Financial Officer or Assistant Treasurer, or
Secretary or Assistant Secretary)
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS:

Service Plan Exhibit A
Payment Provisions Exhibit B
Authorized Representatives and Notices Exhibit C
General Conditions Exhibit D
Special Conditions Exhibit E
Insurance Provisions Exhibit F
Sanctuary City Compliance Statement Exhibit G
Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete Cutting
1501
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT A

SERVICE PLAN
Contractor shall, to the satisfaction of the Project Manager (set forth in Exhibit B), perform the following services and be compensated as outlined below [or attach service plan if necessary]:

Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete
Duties and responsibilities of the contractor include, but are not limited to:
• The Contractor must repair all sidewalk trip hazards from ¼" and up to 2" in designated work areas.
• The Contractor must be able to initiate work within ten (10) days of contract award from the customer, and must provide data from current and previous projects (as well as customer contact information for those projects) to demonstrate capability. • The Contractor must remove hazards completely—from one end of the raised sidewalk joint to the other, if applicable—leaving an absolute zero point of differential between slabs. • The Contractor may not use any type of "fill" material that deteriorates or breaks apart over time. • The Contractor must not cause any damage to landscaping, retaining walls, curbs, sprinkler heads, utility covers, or other objects adjacent to sidewalks. If the contractor and/or the contractor’s equipment causes any damage to the above, the contractor must be notified immediately and damages must be repaired at the contractor’s expense within 24 hours of the time the damage occurred.
• The footprint of the equipment must fit within a 3- to 4-foot-wide sidewalk panel. • The Contractor must completely and immediately clean up all debris after each hazard is repaired. All costs incurred for disposal of waste material shall be included in the unit cost and not paid for separately.
• The Contractor must provide proof that all concrete and debris is recycled in a proper, environmentally safe manner.
• The Contractor is not allowed to cut the concrete deeper than the opposing slab. If any cutting goes deeper than the opposing slab, the Contractor is required to remove and replace the entire concrete panel.
• No water-cooling is allowed if it creates slurry, contaminates storm drains, or causes excessive environmental impact.
• The Contractor must use a dust abatement system, which limits the dust emitted from the equipment.
• The Contractor must submit an itemized summary of all repaired hazards, which includes:
• The specific hazard height—both high side and low side measurement—in ⅛-inch increments • The calculated unit for measurement, defined as the average depth of the trip hazard multiplied by the width, resulting in an "inch-foot" total
• The total width of actual repair, rounded to the nearest ½ foot • The physical location (address) of each repair
• The Contractor shall submit a detailed monthly invoice setting forth the services performed, in accordance with the formula for saw-cutting calculations. Inch-feet shall be calculated by multiplying the average depth of the cut by the width of the cut. 1502
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and Precision Emprise
LLC dba Precision Concrete Cutting
1503
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and Precision
Emprise LLC dba Precision
Concrete Cutting
1504
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT B

PAYMENT PROVISIONS

1. COMPENSATION TO CONTRACTOR:
a. Provided Contractor is not in default under this Contract, Contractor shall be compensated in the manner set forth herein.
b. All payments made pursuant to this Contract shall be subject to the Contract Payment Limit. The Payment Limit includes expenses (phones, photocopying, meals and travel, etc.). Invoices shall be adequately detailed, based on accurate records, and be in a form reasonably satisfactory to the City. Contractor may be required to provide back-up material upon request. c. All City vendors receiving new contracts shall sign up to receive electronic payments through the City’s Automated Clearinghouse (ACH) payments service/provider.

2. SUBMISSION OF INVOICES:

Contractor shall submit timely invoices by email to
[email protected] and/or to the following address:

Attention: City of Richmond Finance/Account Payable
Project Manager: _______________________
P.O. Box 4046
Richmond, CA 94804

3. All invoices that are submitted by Contractor shall be subject to the approval of the City Project Manager, _______________________, before payments shall be authorized.
a. The City will pay invoice(s) within 45 days after completion of services to the City’s satisfaction. The City shall not pay late fees or interest.
b. All appropriate permits, certificates, and licenses, including a City business license shall be obtained and maintained for the duration of this Contract before any payment is authorized.

4. All insurance coverage required by this Contract shall be provided by the Contractor before this Contract is executed by the City. The insurance coverage required by this Contract shall be maintained by Contractor for the duration of this Contract and must be in place before any payment is authorized.

Dan Santos Dan Santos Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete 1505
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT C

AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVES AND NOTICES

1. All required written notices shall be delivered: (i) by hand; or (ii) sent by registered, express, or certified mail, with return receipt requested or with delivery confirmation requested from the U.S. postal service; or (iii) sent by overnight or same day courier service at the party’s respective address listed in this Section.

2. Each notice shall be deemed to have been received on the earlier to occur of:
actual delivery or the date on which delivery is refused; or three (3) days after notice is deposited in the U.S. mail or with a courier service in the manner described above (Sundays and City holidays excepted).

3. Either party may, at any time, change its notice address (other than to a post office box address) by giving the other party three (3) days prior written notice of the new address.

4. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from Contractor to the City shall be addressed to the City at:

City of Richmond
450 Civic Center Plaza
Richmond, CA 94804
Email: ________________________________________________

5. All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from the City to Contractor shall be addressed to Contractor at:

Attn:

Email: ________________________________________________ Dan Santos [email protected] Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete Cutting 335 Beach Road Burlingame, CA 94010 [email protected] Joseph Ortega 1506
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT D

GENERAL CONDITIONS

1. INDEPENDENT PARTIES:

Contractor hereby declares that Contractor is engaged as an independent business and Contractor agrees to perform the services as an independent contractor.

The manner and means of conducting the services and tasks are under the control of Contractor except to the extent they are limited by statute, rule or regulation and the express terms of this Contract. No civil service status or other right of employment will be acquired by virtue of Contractor’s services. None of the benefits provided by the City to its employees, including but not limited to unemployment insurance, workers’ compensation plans, vacation and sick leave, are available from the City to Contractor, its employees or agents. Deductions shall not be made for any state or federal taxes, FICA payments, PERS payments, or other purposes normally associated with an employer-employee relationship from any compensation due to Contractor. Payments of the above items, if required, are the responsibility of Contractor.

2. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE:

Contractor and the City agree that time is of the essence regarding the performance of this Contract.

3. STANDARD OF CARE:

Contractor agrees to perform all services hereunder in a manner commensurate with the prevailing standards of like professionals or service Contractors, as applicable, in the San Francisco Bay Area and agrees that all services shall be performed by qualified and experienced personnel who are not employed by the City.

4. IMMIGRATION REFORM AND CONTROL ACT (IRCA):

Contractor assumes all responsibility for verifying the identity and employment authorization of all of its employees performing work hereunder, pursuant to all applicable IRCA or other federal, or state rules and regulations. Contractor shall indemnify, defend, and hold the City harmless from and against any loss, damage, liability, costs or expenses arising from any noncompliance of this provision by Contractor.

5. NON-DISCRIMINATION:

Consistent with the City’s policy and state and federal law that harassment and discrimination are unacceptable conduct, Contractor and its employees, contractors, and agents shall not harass or discriminate against any job applicant, City employee, or any other person on the basis of any kind of any statutorily (federal, state or local) protected class, including but not limited to: race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete
1507
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
disability (both mental and physical) including HIV and AIDS, medical condition (e.g. cancer), genetic information, marital status, sex, gender, gender identity, gender expression, age, sexual orientation, pregnancy, political affiliation, military and veteran status or legitimate union activities. Contractor agrees that any violation of this provision shall constitute a material breach of this Contract.

6. CITY PROPERTY:
a. Each and every report, draft, work product, map, record, applicable plans, drawings, calculation, data, specification, video, graphic, or any other material or document produced, prepared or caused to be prepared by Contractor pursuant to or in connection with this Contract shall be the exclusive property of the City. b. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Contractor shall not be obligated to provide to City proprietary software or data which Contractor has developed or had developed for Contractor's own use; provided, however, that Contractor shall, pursuant to Section 11 below, indemnify, defend and hold the City harmless from and against any discovery or Public Records Act request seeking the disclosure of such proprietary software or data. c. No report, information or other data given to or prepared or assembled by Contractor pursuant to this Contract shall be made available to any individual or organization by Contractor without prior approval of the City Manager or their designee. d. Contractor shall, at such time and in such form as City Manager or their designee may require, furnish reports concerning the status of services and tasks required under this Contract.

7. RECORDS:
a. Contractor shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to the services, tasks, work, documents and data in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of Contractor’s performance under the Contract, as well as maintain books and records related to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by the City that relate to the performance of the services and tasks under this Contract (collectively the “Records”).
b. All Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Contractor shall provide free access to the Records to the representatives of the City or its designees during regular business hours upon reasonable prior notice. The City has the right to examine and audit the Records, and to make copies or transcripts therefrom as necessary, and to allow inspection of all proceedings and activities related to this Contract. Such Records, together with supporting documents, shall be kept separate from other documents and records and shall be maintained by Contractor for a period of five (5) years after receipt of final payment.

Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete
1508
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
c. If supplemental examination or audit of the Records is necessary due to concerns raised by the City’s preliminary examination or audit of records, and the City’s supplemental examination or audit of the records discloses a failure to adhere to appropriate internal financial controls, or other breach of this Contract or failure to act in good faith, then Contractor shall reimburse the City for all reasonable costs and expenses associated with the supplemental examination or audit.

8. PERMITS AND LICENSES:

Contractor, at its sole expense, shall obtain and maintain during the term of this Contract, all appropriate permits, certificates and licenses, including a City business license, required in connection with the performance of the services and tasks hereunder.

The failure to obtain such permits and licenses shall be a material breach of this Contract and grounds for immediate termination by City; provided, however, that City may waive the business license requirement in writing under unusual or extraordinary circumstances without necessitating any modification of this Contract to reflect such waiver.

9. TERMINATION:
a. Termination Without Default. Notwithstanding any provision herein to the contrary, the City may, in its sole and absolute discretion and without cause, terminate this Contract at any time prior to completion by Contractor of the project or services hereunder immediately upon transmission of written notice to Contractor as provided in Exhibit C “Authorized Representatives and Notices”.
b. Termination in the Event of Default. Should Contractor fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, within the time and in the manner provided or otherwise violate any of the terms of this Contract, City may immediately terminate this Contract by giving written notice of such termination, stating the reasons for such termination. Contractor shall be compensated as provided in Exhibit B; provided, however, there shall be deducted from such amount the amount of damage, including attorney's fees, expert witness fees and costs, if any, sustained by City by virtue of Contractor's breach of this Contract. Additionally, in the event of such termination, the City may proceed with the work in any reasonable manner it chooses.

10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

Contractor acknowledges, represents and warrants that Contractor shall avoid all conflicts of interest (as defined under any federal, state or local statute, rule or regulation, or at common law) with respect to this Contract. Contractor further acknowledges, represents and warrants that no City official or employee has any economic interest, as defined in Title 2, California Code of Regulations §§ 18703.1 through 18703.5, with Contractor that would invalidate this Contract. Contractor acknowledges that in the event that Contractor shall be found by any judicial or administrative body to have any conflict of interest (as defined above) with respect to this Contract, all consideration received under Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete
1509
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
this Contract shall be forfeited and returned to City forthwith. This provision shall survive the termination of this Contract for one (1) year.

11. HOLD HARMLESS:
a. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contractor shall indemnify, defend (with counsel acceptable to the City) and hold harmless the City, its City Council, boards, commissions, officials, employees, agents and volunteers (“Indemnitees”) from and against any and all loss, damages, liability, obligations, claims, suits, judgments, costs and expenses whatsoever, including attorney’s fees and costs of litigation (“Claims”), arising from or in any manner connected to Contractor’s performance of its obligations under this Contract or failure to comply with any of its obligations under this Contract or out of the operations conducted by Contractor even if the City is found to have been negligent. If the Claims filed against Indemnitees allege negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct on the part of Contractor, Contractor shall have no right of reimbursement against Indemnitees for the costs of defense even if negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct is not found on the part of Contractor. Contractor shall not have any obligations to indemnify Indemnitees if the loss or damage is found to have resulted solely from the negligence or the willful misconduct of the City. The defense and indemnification obligations of this Contract are undertaken in addition to, and shall not in any way be limited by, the insurance obligations contained in this Contract. b. This indemnification obligation shall survive this Contract and shall not be limited by any term of any insurance policy required under this Contract; provided however, that if this Contract is for design professional services, this indemnity provision is limited to claims that arise out of, pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of the design professional (as defined in California Civil Code section 2782.8).

12. LIMITATIONS UPON SUBCONTRACTING AND ASSIGNMENT:
a. This Contract binds the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of Contractor. The Contractor shall not enter into subcontracts for any work contemplated under this Contract and shall not assign this Contract, nor any portion hereof or monies due or to become due, without the prior written consent of the City Council or its designee.
b. Contractor shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate, or transfer this Contract, or any interest therein, directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise, without prior written consent of the City Manager. Contractor shall submit a written request for consent to transfer to the City Manager at least thirty (30) days in advance of the desired transfer.

The City Manager or their designee may consent or reject such request in their sole and absolute discretion. Any attempt to do so without said consent shall be null and void, and any assignee, sublessee, hypothecate or transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer. However, claims for Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete
1510
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
money against the City under this Contract may be assigned by Contractor to a bank, trust company or other financial institution without prior written consent. c. The sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Contractor (if applicable), or of the interest of any general partner or joint venturer or syndicate member if Contractor is a partnership or jointventure or syndicate, which shall result in a change of control of Contractor, shall be deemed an assignment. For this purpose, control shall mean fifty percent or more of the voting power or twenty-five percent or more of the assets of the corporation, partnership or joint-venture.
d. Only those persons and/or businesses whose names and resumés are attached to this Contract shall be used in the performance of this Contract. However, if after the start of this Contract, Contractor wishes to use sub-contractors, at no additional costs to the City, then Contractor shall submit a written request for consent to add subcontractors including the names of the sub-contractors and the reasons for the request to the City Manager at least five (5) days in advance. The City Manager may consent or reject such requests in their sole and absolute discretion. e. Each sub-contractor shall be required to furnish proof of workers’ compensation insurance and shall also be required to carry general, automobile and professional liability insurance (as applicable) in reasonable conformity to the insurance carried by Contractor.
f. In addition, any tasks or services performed by sub-contractors shall be subject to each provision of this Contract. Contractor shall include the following language in their Contract with any sub-contractor: “Sub-Contractors hired by Contractor agree to be bound to Contractor and the City in the same manner and to the same extent as Contractor is bound to the City.”
g. The requirements in this Section 12 shall not apply to persons who are merely providing materials, supplies, data or information that Contractor then analyzes and incorporates into its work product.

13. SAFETY:
a. Contractor acknowledges that the City is committed to the highest standards of workplace safety. Contractor will be solely and completely responsible for conditions of all vehicles owned or operated by Contractor, including the safety of all persons and property during performance of the services and tasks under this Contract.

Contractor shall assume sole and complete responsibility for the safety of Contractor's employees and any of subcontractor's employees This requirement will apply continuously and not be limited to normal working hours. In addition, Contractor will comply with all safety provisions in conformance with U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Act, any equivalent state law, and all other applicable Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete
1511
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
federal, state, county and local laws, ordinances, codes, and any regulations that may be detailed in other parts of the Contract. Where any of these are in conflict, the more stringent requirements will be followed. Contractor’s failure to thoroughly familiarize itself with the aforementioned safety provisions will not relieve it from compliance with the obligations and penalties set forth herein.
b. Contractor will immediately notify the City (in no event less than 24 hours) of any incident of death, serious personal injury or substantial property damage that occurs in connection with the performance of this Contract. Contractor will promptly submit to the City a written report of all incidents that occur in connection with this Contract. This report must include the following information: (i) name and address of injured or deceased person(s); (ii) name and address of Contractor’s employee(s) involved in the incident; (iii) name and address of Contractor’s liability insurance carrier; (iv) a detailed description of the incident; and (v) a police report.
c. Contractor acknowledges that the City shall have the right to impose, at the City’s sole discretion, requirements that it deems are necessary to protect the health and safety of the City employees, residents, and visitors. Contractor agrees to comply with all such requirements, including, but not limited to, mandatory vaccinations, the use of personal protective equipment (e.g. masks), physical distancing, and health screenings.

Contractor also agrees to make available to the City, at the City’s request, records to demonstrate Contractor’s compliance with this Section.

14. INSURANCE:

Insurance requirements are set forth in Exhibit F to this Contract. Contractor shall abide by the insurance requirements set forth in said Exhibit F.

15. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE LAWS:
a. During the term of this Contract, Contractor shall keep fully informed of all existing and future state and federal laws and all municipal ordinances and regulations of the City of Richmond which affect the manner in which the services or tasks are to be performed by Contractor, as well as all such orders and decrees of bodies or tribunals having any jurisdiction or authority over the same. Contractor shall comply with all applicable laws, state and federal and all ordinances, rules and regulations enacted or issued by the City. Compliance under this provision includes compliance with all provisions of the Richmond Municipal Code ("Municipal Code"), including Chapters 2.50,

2.52, 2.56, and 2.60, if applicable.
b. Contractor acknowledges that under § 2.60.070 of the Municipal Code ("Living Wage Ordinance"), Contractor is required to provide the City with documents and information verifying its compliance with the Living Wage Ordinance. Contractor shall notify each of its affected employees with regards to the wages that are required to be paid pursuant to the Living Wage Ordinance as prescribed in § 2.60.070 of the Municipal Code.

Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete
1512
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
c. Contractor shall comply with § 2.28.030 of the Municipal Code, obligating every Contractor or sub-Contractor under an agreement or sub-agreement with the City for public works, goods or services to refrain from discriminatory employment or practices on the basis of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, religious creed, national origin or ancestry of any employee, any applicant for employment or any potential sub-contractor. d. Contractor acknowledges that the City’s Drug Free Workplace Policy, Violence in the Workplace Policy and the Policy Against Workplace Harassment, are available on the City’s website at http://www.ci.richmond.ca.us/workplacepolicies.

Contractor agrees to abide by the terms and conditions of said policies.

16. INTEGRATED CONTRACT:

The Recitals and exhibits are a material part of this Contract and are expressly incorporated herein. This Contract represents the full and complete understanding of every kind or nature whatsoever between the parties hereto, and all preliminary negotiations and agreements of whatsoever kind or nature are merged herein. No verbal agreement or implied covenant shall be held to vary the provisions hereof. Any modification of this Contract will be effective only by written execution signed by both the City and Contractor.

17. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS:

In the event of a conflict between these General Conditions and those of any Exhibit or attachment hereto, these General Conditions shall prevail; provided, however, that any Special Condition as set forth in Exhibit E shall prevail over these General Conditions. In the event of a conflict between the terms and conditions of any two or more Exhibits or attachments hereto, those prepared by City shall prevail over those prepared by the Contractor, and the terms and conditions preferred by the City shall prevail over those preferred by the Contractor.

18. FORCE MAJEURE:

Neither party hereto shall be considered in default in the performance of its obligations hereunder to the extent that the performance of such an obligation is prevented or delayed by reason of acts of God, strikes, boycotts, lock-outs, inability to procure materials not related to the price thereof, failure of power, restrictive governmental laws and regulations enacted after the date of this Contract, riots, civil unrest, acts of terrorism, insurrection, war, declaration of a state or national emergency or other reasons of a like nature not within the reasonable control of such party.

19. CONFLICT OF LAW:

This Contract shall be interpreted under, and enforced by the laws of the State of Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete
1513
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
California without regard to any choice of law rules which may direct the application of laws of another jurisdiction. The Contract and obligations of the parties are subject to all valid laws, orders, rules, and regulations of the authorities having jurisdiction over this Contract (or the successors of those authorities). Any suits brought pursuant to this Contract shall be filed with the courts of the County of Contra Costa, State of California.

20. CLAIMS:

Any claim by Contractor against City hereunder shall be subject to Government Code §§ 800 et seq. The claims presentation provisions of said Act are hereby modified such that the presentation of all claims hereunder to the City shall be waived if not made within six months after accrual of the cause of action.

21. INTERPRETATION:

This Contract shall be interpreted as if drafted by both parties.

22. WARRANTY:

If any product is be provided to the City as part of this Contract, Contractor warrants as follows: Contractor possesses good title to the product and the right to transfer the product to City; the product shall be delivered to the City free from any security interest or other lien; the product meets any specifications contained herein; the product shall be free from material defects in materials and workmanship under normal use for a period of one (1) year from the date of delivery; and the product shall be fit for its intended purpose(s). Notwithstanding the foregoing, consumable and maintenance items (such as light bulbs and batteries) shall be warranted for a period of one hundred and eighty (180) days from the date of delivery. All repairs during the warranty period shall be promptly performed by Contractor, at Contractor's expense, including shipping.

23. SEVERABILITY:

In the event that any of the provisions or portions or applications thereof of this Contract are held to be unenforceable or invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction, City and Contractor shall negotiate an equitable adjustment in the provisions of the Contract with a view toward effecting the purpose of this Contract, and the validity and enforceability of the remaining provisions or portions or applications thereof, shall not be affected thereby.

24. AUTHORITY:

City warrants and represents that the signatory hereto (the Mayor of the City of Richmond or the City Manager) is duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of City. The party signing on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that they are duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of Contractor, Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete
1514
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
and shall be personally liable to City if they are not duly authorized to enter into and execute this Contract on behalf of Contractor.

25. WAIVER:

The waiver by City of any breach of any term or provision of this Contract shall not be construed as a waiver of any subsequent breach. Inspections or approvals, or statements by any officer, agent or employee of the City relating to the Contractor’s performance, or payment therefore, or any combination of these acts, shall not relieve the Contractor’s obligation to fulfill this Contract as prescribed; nor shall the City be thereby stopped from bringing any action for damages or enforcement arising from any failure to comply with any of the terms and conditions of this Contract.

26. COUNTERPARTS:

This Contract may be executed in any number of counterparts (including by fax, PDF, DocuSign, or other electronic means), each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.

27. SANCTUARY CITY CONTRACTING ORDINANCE (SCCO):

The Richmond Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance No. 12-18 prohibits the City from granting and or retaining contracts with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Contractor must submit the Sanctuary City Compliance Statement, attached hereto as Exhibit G.

Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete
1515
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT E

SPECIAL CONDITIONS
The General Conditions are hereby amended to include the following modifications and/or provisions (if applicable, otherwise please state “NONE”):

Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete Cutti
NONE.
1516
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT F

INSURANCE PROVISIONS
☐ CHECK HERE IF RISK MANAGEMENT HAS APPROVED WAIVING INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS CONTRACT.

1. CERTIFICATES: Before the commencement of the terms of this Contract, and during the entire term of this Contract and any extension or modification thereof, Contractor shall furnish the City’s Risk Manager with certificates showing the type, amount, class of operations covered, effective dates and dates of expiration of insurance coverage in compliance with coverage requirements set forth by the City and incorporated herein.

Such certificates, which do not limit Contractor’s indemnification, shall also contain substantially the following statement:
“Should any of the above insurance covered by this certificate be canceled or coverage reduced before the expiration date thereof, the insurer affording coverage shall provide thirty (30) days’ advance written notice to the City of Richmond.

Attention: Risk Manager.”
Contractor shall maintain in force at all times during the performance of this Contract all appropriate coverage of insurance required by this Contract with an insurance company licensed to offer insurance business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best’s rating of no less than A:VII or Standard & Poor’s Rating (if rated) of at least BBB unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Contractor shall deliver updated insurance certificates to the City at the address set forth in Exhibit C prior to the expiration of the existing insurance certificate for the duration of the term of Contract.

Endorsements naming the City, its City Council, boards, commissions, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers as additional insured shall be submitted with the insurance certificates.

2. COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS: The City’s insurance requirements depend upon the type of service being provided and/or the provider. The City’s insurance requirements will fall into one of the following categories (unless otherwise provided by the City):

Consultants and Contractors – Type 1
Professional Services – Type 2
Environmental Risk/Hazardous Waste Material – Type 3
Lease of City Property – Type 4
Vendors, Suppliers, Small Grant Recipients & Nonprofit Organizations – Type 5 Transportation Providers – Type 6
Professional Services Pyrotechnics – Type 7
Cyber and I.T. Risks – Type 8
Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete Cutti
1517
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________
The insurance requirements classification applicable to this Contract shall be attached to this Exhibit F and made a part hereof.

3. FAILURE TO SECURE: If Contractor at any time during the term hereof should fail to secure or maintain the foregoing insurance, the City shall be permitted to obtain such insurance in Contractor’s name or as an agent of Contractor and shall be compensated by Contractor for the costs of the insurance premiums at the maximum rate permitted by law and computed from the date written notice is received that the premiums have not been paid.

4. SUFFICIENCY OF INSURANCE: The insurance limits required by the City are not represented as being sufficient to protect Contractor. Contractor is advised to consult Contractor’s insurance broker to determine adequate coverage for Contractor. The coverage and limits shall be (1) the minimum coverage and limits specified in this Contract; or (2) the broader coverage and maximum limits of the coverage carried by or available to Contractor; whichever is greater.

INSERT INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS CLASSIFICATION APPLICABLE TO THIS CONTRACT: (IF NECESSARY, CONFIRM WITH RISK MANAGER)
Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete Cutti
1518
20 Exhibit B
Insurance Requirements
1519
21 1520
22 1521
23 1522
Contract No: ________ For the Contract between the City of Richmond and
_____________________________

EXHIBIT G

SANCTUARY CITY COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
The undersigned, (hereafter "Contractor"), has had an opportunity to review the requirements of City of Richmond Ordinance 12-18 (hereafter "Sanctuary City Contracting Ordinance" or “SCCO”).

Contractor understands and agrees that the City may choose with whom it will maintain business relations and may refrain from contracting with any person or entity that provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Division of the United States Department of Homeland Security (“ICE”). Contractor understands the meaning of the following terms used in the SCCO:
a. "Data Broker” means either of the following:
i. The collection of information, including personal information about consumers, from a wide variety of sources for the purposes of reselling such information to their customers, which include both private-sector business and government agencies;
ii. The aggregation of data that was collected for another purpose from that for which it is ultimately used.
b. “Extreme Vetting” means data mining, threat modeling, predictive risk analysis, or other similar services."
Contractor understands that it is not eligible to receive or retain a City contract if at the time the Contract is executed, or at any time during the term of the Contract, it provides Data Broker or Extreme Vetting services to ICE.

Contractor further understands and agrees that Contractor's failure to comply with the SCCO shall constitute a material default of the Contract and the City Manager may terminate the Contract and bar Contractor from bidding on future contracts with the City for five (5) years from the effective date of the contract termination.

By executing this statement, Contractor certifies that it complies with the requirements of the SCCO and that if at any time during the term of the Contract it ceases to comply, Contractor will promptly notify the City Manager in writing. Any person or entity who knowingly or willingly supplies false information in violation of the SCCO shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a $1,000 fine.

Based on the foregoing, the undersigned declares under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct.

Printed Name: Title:

Signed: Date:

Business Entity:

Precision Emprise LLC Dba Precision Concrete Cutt
1523

August 26, 2025
City Council
DATE: August 26, 2025
TO: Mayor Martinez and Members of the City Council
FROM: Councilmember Soheila Bana
Mayor Eduardo Martinez (co-sponsor)
Subject: Presentation to Ban Land Grabs in Richmond - Protect Housing, Communities, and the Future
FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for receiving this item.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

This item was withdrawn from the June 17, 2025, meeting to come back at a later date as a new item.

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

The City of Richmond faces rising housing costs,
displacement, and reduced community stability due to the increasing acquisition of residential properties by for-profit corporations and investors. Housing is a fundamental
human need and there is a need to address these
challenges through progressive housing policies. Banning land grab practices aims to prohibit such acquisitions to preserve housing accessibility, affordability, prioritize community-based ownership models, and recognize
housing as a public good.

RECOMMENDED ACTION: RECEIVE a presentation to Ban Land Grabs in Richmond:

Protect Housing, Communities, and the Future from the
Sustainable Economies Law Center - Councilmember
Soheila Bana (510-672-5242) and Mayor Eduardo
Martinez (510-620-6503).

AGENDA
REPORT
1524

August 26, 2025
DISCUSSION:

The City of Richmond faces rising housing costs, displacement, and reduced community stability due to the increasing acquisition of residential properties by for-profit corporations and investors. Housing is a fundamental human need and there is a need to address these challenges through progressive housing policies. Banning land grab practices aims to prohibit such acquisitions to preserve housing accessibility, affordability, prioritize community-based ownership models, and recognize housing as a public good.

The Sustainable Economies Law Center will present on the growing commodification of housing by for-profit entities and its significant impact on housing affordability and community stability in Richmond and how for-profit corporations and investor(s) ownership has driven displacement and hindered resident-centered housing models.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 – Presentation to Ban Land Grabs in Richmond- Protect Housing, Communities, and the Future PowerPoint
1525
Ban Land Grabs in Richmond
Presented by: Sustainable Economies Law Center
Date: August 26, 2025
1526
Purpose of Presentation
• Share key data on corporate speculation in housing
• Introduce our Ban Land Grabs policy
• Highlight why Richmond should study this policy
1527
The Crisis of Land Grabs
• Nationwide, housing is increasingly
treated as a financial asset—like
the land grabs after the LA fires
• Corporate entities and investors
are speculating on our homes and
communities
• Driving up housing costs and
displacing long-time residents
1528
Rise of Corporate Ownership
Institutional ownership of housing
crowds out first-time homebuyers:
• Investors bought 26% of the
country’s most affordable homes in
late 2023
• Wall Street landlords increase rents
by almost twice the rate of other
landlords
• Meanwhile, only 15 percent of
California households can afford to
purchase a median-priced home
Source: Government Accountability Office, 2023
1529
Housing Costs
Skyrocketing housing costs
drive displacement in
Richmond.

Since 2000, median rents have
increased from $800 to $1900.
1530
Additional Context for Richmond
• In the city, absentee ownership has surged:
10% (2006) → 40% (2012)
• Nearly 50% of households in Richmond are
cost-burdened.
1531
The City Can Buck These Trends.
1532
Corporate Ownership Bans Gaining Momentum
• CA SB-1212 (2024): Blocks investment firms from buying single-family homes
• U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna’s Act (2022): Taxes institutional homebuyers
• CA AB-1240 (Lee, 2025): Limits mega-investors from buying more homes
• Many states already ban corporate or foreign ownership of farmland
1533
Our Ban Land Grabs Proposal
Prohibit for-profit, non-cooperative corporations from
purchasing homes unless they are building affordable housing.

Proactively shape the housing market to only allow the
following entities to purchase housing:
• Nonprofits
• Public Agencies
• Limited Equity Cooperatives
• Individuals (who do not already own multiple properties) 1534
What This Ordinance Will Do
• Stabilize neighborhoods
• Curb profit-seeking speculation
• Support community-based housing
• Block corporate home hoarding
• Create a fairer housing market
1535
The Time is Now
We urge Richmond City Council to adopt a
strong and enforceable policy:
• We must stand up to corporate real estate interests
• On August 19, Council will consider studying and
developing a Ban Land Grabs policy.

Let’s make Richmond a leader in housing justice 1536
Questions for ACCE
What questions do you have about the policy?
How would you shape the policy:
• Would you limit the corporate ownership ban to single family homes or apartment buildings too?
• How many properties or housing units is too much for a single individual to own? 1537

August 26, 2025
Mayor's Office
DATE: August 26, 2025
TO: Members of the City Council
FROM: Mayor Eduardo Martinez, Councilmember Claudia
Jimenez, Councilmember Soheila Bana
Subject: Establishing a Sister City Program Between Richmond and the City of Sebastia, Palestine
FINANCIAL IMPACT: Immediate financial impact is expected to be minimal, primarily limited to staff support. Additional costs, if any, will be identified and reported to Council as the
commission develops.

PREVIOUS COUNCIL
ACTION:

July 1, 2008 (Resolution No. 74-08 establishing the
Zhoushan Sister City Commission)
Sept. 14, 1999 (Resolution No. 147-99 establishing a
Sister City relationship with Regla, Cuba)
February 8, 1993 (Resolution No. 22-93 establishing a
Sister City relationship with Zhoushan, China)
February 10, 1964 (Resolution 8337 establishing the
Richmond-Shimada Friendship Commission)
Oct. 16, 1961 (Council Vote establishing a Sister City
relationship with Shimada, Japan)

STATEMENT OF THE
ISSUE:

Richmond’s tradition of international solidarity through sister city relationships can be strengthened by
establishing a new partnership with Sebastia, Palestine.

AGENDA
REPORT
1538

August 26, 2025
RECOMMENDED ACTION: ADOPT a resolution establishing a Sister City relationship between the City of Richmond, California,
and Sebastia, Palestine —Mayor Eduardo Martinez (510-
620-6502); Councilmember Claudia Jimenez (510-620-
6565); and Councilmember Soheila Bana (510-620-
6743).

DISCUSSION:

The Sister Cities International program was founded in 1956 to promote peace and mutual understanding through community-level diplomacy. Richmond has participated in this program for over six decades, beginning with its 1961 council vote to establish a sister city relationship with Shimada, Japan. Subsequent relationships were established with Zhoushan, China, in 1993 (Resolution No. 22-93) and Regla, Cuba, in 1999 (Resolution No. 147-99). These partnerships have facilitated cultural, educational, and economic exchanges that enrich Richmond residents and strengthen global ties.

Sebastia is an ancient town located north of Nablus in the West Bank of Palestine.

Situated on a hilltop, Sebastia is one of the most historically significant archaeological sites in the region, with continuous habitation from the Canaanite era through the Roman, Byzantine, Islamic, and Ottoman periods to the present day. Its residents maintain a vibrant cultural identity rooted in resilience, community, and historic preservation.

As of early 2025, 147 of the 193 United Nations member states recognize the State of Palestine, representing over 75 percent of the international community. The United States, however, does not. By establishing a sister city relationship with Sebastia, Richmond would demonstrate local leadership in diplomacy, solidarity, and cultural exchange at a time when such connections are needed globally.

DOCUMENTS ATTACHED:

Attachment 1 –Resolution of the Council of the City of Richmond, California in Support of Establishing a Sister City Program With the City of Sebastia, Palestine 1539
Reso. No. _____

RESOLUTION NO. ______

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA

ESTABLISHING A SISTER CITY RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CITY OF

SEBASTIA, PALESTINE
WHEREAS, the City of Richmond has a long and proud history of international solidarity, expressed through the establishment of sister city relationships with Shimada, Japan (1961), Zhoushan, China (1993), and Regla, Cuba (1999); and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Sister Cities Program is to foster friendship, cultural exchange, mutual understanding, and cooperation across international borders, reflecting the values of peace, dignity, and community that the City of Richmond upholds; and
WHEREAS, Sebastia is an ancient town located north of Nablus in the West Bank of Palestine, situated on a hill approximately 440 meters above sea level, and is recognized as one of the most historically significant archaeological sites in the region, with continuous habitation from the Canaanite era through Roman, Byzantine, Islamic, and Ottoman periods to the present day; and WHEREAS, Sebastia’s historical and cultural heritage, including its role as a regional capital in antiquity and its deep ties to Palestinian identity and resilience, provide a strong basis for cultural and educational exchange; and
WHEREAS, As of early 2025, 147 of the 193 United Nations member states recognize the State of Palestine, representing over 75 percent of the international community. The United States, however, does not; and
WHEREAS By establishing a sister city relationship with Sebastia, Richmond would demonstrate local leadership in diplomacy, solidarity, and cultural exchange at a time when such connections are needed globally; and
WHEREAS, the residents and leadership of Sebastia have expressed interest in forming a sister city relationship with Richmond, recognizing shared values of community, cultural preservation, and resilience in the face of adversity; and
WHEREAS, the establishment of a sister city relationship between Richmond and Sebastia will encourage cultural, educational, and economic exchanges, create opportunities for people-to-people diplomacy, and provide a framework for mutual support between our two communities; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Richmond, California, does hereby establish a Sister City relationship with the City of Sebastia, Palestine; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council authorizes the creation of a Richmond–Sebastia Sister City Committee to coordinate exchanges, projects, and communications between the two cities; and BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the City Council reaffirms Richmond’s commitment to peace, justice, and solidarity with people worldwide, recognizing the establishment of this sister city relationship as a continuation of Richmond’s legacy of international friendship and progressive leadership. ******************
***THE CLERK’S OFFICE WILL COMPLETE THE INFORMATION BELOW**** I certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting thereof held on Mmmm dd, yyyy, by the following vote:

AYES:

NOES:
1540
Reso. No. _____

ABSTENTIONS:

ABSENT:

CLERK OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
(SEAL)
Approved:

Mayor
Approved as to form:

City Attorney
State of California }
County of Contra Costa : ss.

City of Richmond }
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of Resolution No. _____, finally passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Richmond at a regular meeting held on Mmmm dd, yyyy.
_______________________________________
Pamela Christian, Clerk of the City of Richmond
1541