City Council / Local Redevelopment Authority / Public Financing Authority
June 9, 2026

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 6 of 23 PART II — METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
A. BENEFIT ANALYSIS
The 1982 Benefit Act permits the establishment of assessment districts by agencies for the purpose of providing for the maintenance, servicing and operation of drainage improvements and appurtenant facilities. The 1982 Benefit Act further requires that the cost of these improvements and activities and the corresponding assessments shall be related to the benefit derived and the annual aggregate amount of the assessment shall not exceed the estimated annual cost of providing such improvements and the service.

The method of apportionment described in this Report for allocation of special benefit assessments utilizes commonly accepted engineering practices and have been established pursuant to the 1982 Benefit Act and the provisions of the California Constitution. The formula used for calculating assessments for the District reflects the composition of the parcels and the improvements provided to fairly apportion the costs based on special benefits to each parcel. Furthermore, pursuant to the Constitution Article XIII D, Section 4, a parcel’s assessment may not exceed the reasonable cost of the proportional special benefit conferred on that parcel and a parcel may only be assessed for special benefits received.

All improvements and services associated with the District have been identified as necessary, required and/or desired for the orderly development of the properties within the District to their full potential and consistent with the proposed development plans and the City’s General Plan. As such, these improvements would be necessary and required of individual property owners for the development of such properties and the ongoing operation, servicing and maintenance of the improvements and facilities would be the financial obligation of those properties. Therefore, the storm drain facilities and infrastructure, and the annual costs of ensuring the maintenance and operation of these improvements provide special benefits to the properties within the District. However, it is also recognized that a portion of the District improvements and services provides some benefits to properties outside the District boundaries or to the public at large and are therefore considered general benefit. Specifically, the drainage basin and related facilities including the drainage basin landscaping, fencing and pumps benefit developments in the area. All District costs have been identified as special benefit and shall be allocated to each property in proportion to the special benefits received.

B. ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY
The method of apportionment for the District calculates the receipt of special benefit from the respective improvements based on the actual or proposed land use of the parcels within the District. The special benefit received by each lot or parcel is equated to the overall land use of parcels within the District based on the parcel’s actual land use or proposed development.

It has been determined that each of the residential parcels within the District receives special benefits from all the improvements to be funded by annual assessments and, based on the planned property development, a single zone of benefit is appropriate for the

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 7 of 23 allocation of the assessments and proportional benefit. At the writing of this Report, the parcels within the District had not been fully subdivided, based on available parcel information from the County Assessor’s Office. Therefore, the parcels within the District may be identified by one of the following land use classifications and is assigned a weighting factor known as an Equivalent Benefit Unit (EBU) that best reflects both the current and proposed use of each parcel. The EBUs calculated for a specific parcel defines that parcel’s proportional special benefits from the proposed District improvements, facilities and services.

Equivalent Benefit Units
To assess benefits equitably it is necessary to relate each property’s proportional special benefits to the special benefits of all other properties within the District. The EBU method of apportioning assessments uses the single-family home site as the basic unit of assessment. A single-family home site equals one EBU. All other land uses are converted to EBUs based on an assessment formula that equates the property’s specific development status, type of development (land use), and size of the property, as compared to a singlefamily home site.

The EBU method of apportioning special benefits is typically seen as the most appropriate and equitable assessment methodology for districts formed under the 1982 Benefit Act, as the benefits to each parcel from the improvements are apportioned as a function of land use type, size, and development. Although the EBU method of apportioning special benefit is commonly used and applied to districts that have a wide range of land use classifications (residential and non-residential use), this District is comprised of only residential properties and the following apportionment analysis of special benefit addresses only residential land uses. Not all land use types described in the following are necessarily applicable to the development of properties within this District, but are presented for comparison purposes to support the proportional special benefit applied to those land use types within the District:

EBU Application by Land Use:

Single-Family Residential — This land use is defined as a fully subdivided residential home site with or without a structure. This land use is assessed 1.00 EBU per lot or parcel.

This EBU is the base value that all other properties are compared and weighted against.

Multi-Family Residential — This land use is defined as a fully subdivided residential parcel that has more than one residential unit developed on the property. This land use typically includes apartments, duplexes, triplex etc. It does not typically include condominiums, town-homes or mobile home parks. Based on average population densities and size of the structure as compared to a typical single-family residential unit, multi-family residential parcels shall be proportionately assessed for the parcel’s total number of residential units utilizing a sliding benefit scale. Although multi-family properties typically receive similar benefits to that of a single-family residential property, it would not be reasonable to conclude that on a per unit basis, the benefits are equal. Studies have consistently shown that the average multi-family unit impacts infrastructure approximately 75% as much as a single-family residence (Sample Sources: Institute of Transportation Engineers Informational Report Trip Generation, Fifth Edition; Metcalf and Eddy, Wastewater

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 8 of 23 Engineering Treatment, Disposal, Reuse, Third Edition). These various studies indicate that most public improvements and infrastructure are utilized and impacted at reduced levels by multi-family residential units and a similar reduction in proportional benefit is appropriate. Furthermore, it is also reasonable to conclude that as the density (number of units) increases; the proportional benefit per unit tends to decline because the unit size and people per unit usually decreases. Based on these considerations and the improvements provided by this District, it has been determined that an appropriate allocation of special benefit for multi-family residential properties is best represented by the following special benefit assignment: 0.75 EBU per unit for the first 5 units; 0.50 EBU per unit for units 6 through 50; and 0.25 EBU per unit for all remaining units.

Condominium/Town-home Units — Condominiums and town-homes tend to share attributes of both single-family residential and multi-family residential properties and for this reason are identified as a separate land use classification. Like most single-family residential properties, these properties are not usually considered rental property and generally the County assigns each unit a separate APN or assessment number. However, condominiums and town-homes often have similarities to multi-family residential properties - they are generally zoned medium to high density and in some cases may involve multiple units on a single APN. In consideration of these factors it has been determined that an appropriate allocation of special benefit for condominiums, town-homes and similar residential properties is best represented by an assignment of 0.75 EBU per unit regardless of whether each unit is assigned an individual APN or there are multiple units assigned to an APN. There is no adjustment for parcels with more than five units.

Planned-Residential Development — This land use is defined as any property for which a tentative or final tract map has been filed and approved (a specific number of residential lots and units has been identified) and the property is expected to be subdivided within the fiscal year or is part of the overall improvement and development plan for the District. This land use classification oftentimes involves more than a single parcel (e.g. the approved tract map encompasses more than a single APN). Each parcel that is part of the approved tract map shall be assessed proportionately for the proposed or estimated residential type and units to be developed on that parcel as part of the approved tract map. Accordingly, each parcel is assigned an appropriate number of benefit units that reflects the development of that property at build-out. The EBU assigned to each parcel shall represent the combination of single-family, condominium, multi-family units to be developed.

Vacant Residential — This land use is defined as property currently zoned for residential development, but a tentative or final tract map for the property has not yet been approved.

Based upon the opinions of professional appraisers who appraise market property values for real estate in Southern California, the land value portion of a property typically ranges from 20 to 30 percent of the total value of a developed residential property (the average is about 25 percent). Therefore, it has been determined that a reasonable allocation of special benefit for this type of property would parallel the twenty-five percent (25%) apportionment of property value and the number of single-family residential units typically developed per acre (an average of 4 units per acre). Based on these factors this land use shall be assigned

1.0 EBU per acre (4 units per acre x 25%). Parcels less than one acre shall be assigned a minimum of 1.0 EBU (similar to a vacant lot within a residential tract). Recognizing that the

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 9 of 23 full and timely utilization of vacant property is reduced as the size of the property increases, it has been determined that the maximum EBU assigned to a vacant residential parcel shall not exceed 25.0 EBU (parcels in excess of 25 acres are assigned 25.0 EBU).

Exempt Parcels — This land use identifies properties that are not assessed and are assigned 0.00 EBU. This land use classification may include but is not limited to:
 Lots or parcels identified as public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County);
 Dedicated public easements including open space areas, utility rights-of-way, greenbelts, parkways, parks or other publicly owned properties that are part of the District improvements or that have little or no improvement value;  Private properties that cannot be developed independently from an adjacent property, such as common areas, sliver parcels, or bifurcated lots or properties with very restrictive development use.

These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempted from assessment.

Special Cases — In many districts where multiple land use classifications are involved, there is usually one or more properties that the standard land use classifications or usual calculation of benefit will not accurately identify the special benefits received from the improvements. For example, a parcel may be identified as a Vacant Residential property, however only a small percentage of the parcel’s total acreage can actually be developed.

In this case, an appropriate calculation would be based on the net acreage that can be utilized rather than the gross acreage of the parcel. The following table provides a summary of land use types and the Equivalent Benefit Unit factors used to calculate each parcel’s individual EBU as outlined above.

Land Uses and Equivalent Benefit Units
Property Type
Equivalent
Benefit Units Multiplier
Single-family Residential 1.00 Per Unit/Lot/Parcel
Multi-family Residential

0.75 Per Unit for the First 5 Units

0.50 Per Unit for Units 6-50

0.25 Per Unit for all remaining units
Condominium/Town-home 0.75 Per Unit
Planned-Residential Development

1.00 Per Planned SF Residential Lot

0.75 Per Planned Condominium

0.25 Per Unit for all remaining units
Vacant 1.00 Per Acre
Exempt Parcels 0.00 Per Parcel
The following formula is used to calculate each parcel’s EBU (proportional benefit):

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 10 of 23 Parcel Type EBU x Acres or Units = Parcel EBU
The total number of EBUs is the sum of all individual EBUs applied to parcels that receive special benefit from the improvements. An assessment amount per EBU (Assessment Rate) for the improvements is established by taking the total cost of the improvements and dividing that amount by the total EBUs of all the parcels benefiting from the improvements. This Rate is then applied back to each parcel’s individual EBU to determine the parcel’s proportionate benefit and assessment obligation for the improvements.

Total Balance to Levy / Total EBU = Levy per EBU
Levy per EBU x Parcel EBU = Parcel Levy Amount
C. ASSESSMENT RANGE FORMULA
Any new or increased assessment requires certain noticing and meeting requirements by law. Prior to the passage of Proposition 218 (California Constitution Articles XIIIC and XIII D), legislative changes in the Brown Act defined a "new or increased assessment" to exclude certain conditions. These conditions included "any assessment that does not exceed an assessment formula or range of assessments previously adopted by the agency or approved by the voters in the area where the assessment is imposed." This definition and conditions were later confirmed through Senate Bill 919 (Proposition 218 implementing legislation).

The purpose of establishing an assessment range formula is to provide for reasonable increases and inflationary adjustment to annual assessments without requiring costly noticing and mailing procedures, which could add to the District costs and assessments.

As part of the District formation, balloting of property owners was required pursuant to the California Constitution, Article XIII D, Section 4.

The assessment range formula for this District shall be applied to all future assessments and is generally defined as: if the proposed annual assessment (levy per EBU) for the upcoming fiscal year is less than or equal to the adjusted Maximum Assessment, then the proposed annual assessment is not considered an increased assessment. The Maximum Assessment is equal to the (Initial) Maximum Assessment established for Fiscal Year 2005/2006 adjusted annually by the annual percentage change in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward Area for All Urban Consumers. The Maximum Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2025/2026 was $238.52 per EBU, the CPI increase for February 2026 is 2.48%. The adjusted Maximum Assessment Rate for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 is $244.43 per EBU.

Beginning in the second fiscal year (Fiscal Year 2006/2007) and each fiscal year thereafter, the Maximum Assessment is recalculated and a new Maximum Assessment established for that fiscal year. The Maximum Assessment shall be adjusted annually and is calculated independent of the District’s annual budget and proposed annual assessment. Any proposed annual assessment (rate per EBU) less than or equal to this Maximum Assessment is not considered an increased assessment, even if the proposed assessment is much greater than the assessment applied in the prior fiscal year.

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 11 of 23 PART III — DISTRICT BUDGET
Storm Drain District No. 05-01 (Sterling Ridge) Total Budget

DIRECT COSTS
Annual Maintenance
Inspection & Abatement: Drainage Basins $1,335
Landscape Maint: Drainage Basins (incl utilities) 2,000 Annual Maint: Drainage Basins/Channelway fencing 513
Annual Inspc/Docs:Inlets, Manholes, Outlets, Etc 988
Annual Maint & Cleaning: Inlets, Manholes, Outlets, Etc 1,500 Annual Inspection & Maint: Storm Drain pipes 2,200
Annual pump operation (include electricity) 500
Annual Maintenance Expenses: Storm Drains $9,036
Total Annual Direct Costs $9,036

ADMINISTRATION COSTS
City Administration & Overhead $23,000
District Administration 2,217
County Administration Fee 97
Miscellaneous/Other Admin Fees 0
Total Annual Administration Costs $25,314
TOTAL DIRECT AND ADMIN COSTS $34,350

COLLECTIONS/(CREDITS) APPLIED TO LEVY
Reserve Collection/(Transfers) $10,226
Capital Improvement Fund Collection/(Transfers) 0
Other Revenues/General Fund Contribution 0
TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS $10,226
BALANCE TO LEVY $44,576

DISTRICT STATISTICS
Total Parcels 361
Parcels Levied 361
Total EBU 361.00
Levy per EBU $123.48
Maximum Levy per EBU $244.43

FUND BALANCE INFORMATION
Beginning Reserve Fund Balance $38,637
Reserve Fund Activity 10,226
Ending Reserve Fund Balance $48,863

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 12 of 23 PART IV — DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAPS
The parcels within the Riverbank Storm Drain District No. 05-01 (Sterling Ridge) consist of all lots, parcels and subdivisions of land located in the planned residential development known as Sterling Ridge. The District covers approximately forty-six (46) acres.

The following District Diagram is based on the Stanislaus County Assessor’s Maps and the Stanislaus County Assessor’s Secured Roll (as of July 2004) and identifies all the parcels of land within the proposed District. The combination of this map and the Assessment Roll contained in this Report constitute the District Assessment Diagram.

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 13 of 23

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 14 of 23

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 15 of 23 PART V — 2026/2027 ASSESSMENT ROLL
Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the Stanislaus County Secured Roll for the year in which the Engineer’s Report is prepared and reflective of the Assessor’s Parcel Maps. A listing of the proposed lots and parcels to be assessed within this District along with the assessment amounts is provided herein.

Non-assessable lots or parcels may include but are not limited to public streets and other roadways (typically not assigned an APN by the County); dedicated public easements, open space areas, right-of-ways, common areas; landlocked parcels, small parcels vacated by the County, bifurcated lots, and any other property that cannot be developed or has little or no value. These types of parcels are considered to receive little or no benefit from the improvements and are therefore exempted from assessment.

If any parcel submitted for collection is identified by the County Auditor/Controller to be an invalid parcel number for the fiscal year, a corrected parcel number and/or new parcel numbers will be identified and resubmitted to the County Auditor/Controller. The assessment amount to be levied and collected for the resubmitted parcel or parcels shall be based on the method of apportionment and assessment rate described in this Report and approved by the City Council. Therefore, if a single parcel has changed to multiple parcels, the assessment amount applied to each of the new parcels shall be recalculated and applied according to the approved method of apportionment and assessment rate rather than a proportionate share of the original assessment.

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 16 of 23 APN EBU Charge
075-049-001-000 1.0 $123.48
075-049-002-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-003-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-004-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-005-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-006-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-007-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-008-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-009-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-010-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-011-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-012-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-013-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-014-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-015-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-016-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-017-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-018-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-019-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-020-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-021-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-022-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-023-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-024-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-025-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-026-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-027-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-028-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-029-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-030-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-031-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-032-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-033-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-034-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-035-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-036-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-037-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-038-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-039-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-040-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-041-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-042-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-043-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-044-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-045-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-046-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-047-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-048-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-049-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-050-000 1.0 123.48

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 17 of 23 APN EBU Charge
075-049-051-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-052-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-053-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-054-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-055-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-056-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-057-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-058-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-059-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-060-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-061-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-062-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-063-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-064-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-065-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-066-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-067-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-068-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-069-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-070-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-071-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-072-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-073-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-074-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-075-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-076-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-077-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-078-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-079-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-080-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-081-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-082-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-083-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-084-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-085-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-086-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-087-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-088-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-089-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-090-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-091-000 1.0 123.48
075-049-092-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-001-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-002-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-003-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-004-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-005-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-006-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-007-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-008-000 1.0 123.48

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 18 of 23 APN EBU Charge
075-088-009-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-010-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-011-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-012-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-013-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-014-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-015-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-016-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-017-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-018-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-019-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-020-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-021-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-022-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-023-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-024-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-025-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-026-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-027-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-028-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-029-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-030-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-031-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-032-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-033-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-034-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-035-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-036-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-037-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-038-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-039-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-040-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-041-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-042-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-043-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-044-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-045-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-046-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-047-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-048-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-049-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-050-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-051-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-052-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-053-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-054-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-055-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-056-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-057-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-058-000 1.0 123.48

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 19 of 23 APN EBU Charge
075-088-059-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-060-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-061-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-062-000 1.0 123.48
075-088-063-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-001-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-002-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-003-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-004-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-005-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-006-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-007-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-008-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-009-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-010-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-011-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-012-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-013-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-014-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-015-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-016-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-017-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-018-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-019-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-020-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-021-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-022-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-023-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-024-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-025-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-026-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-027-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-028-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-029-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-030-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-031-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-032-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-033-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-034-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-035-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-036-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-037-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-038-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-039-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-040-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-041-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-042-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-043-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-044-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-045-000 1.0 123.48

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 20 of 23 APN EBU Charge
075-089-046-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-047-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-048-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-049-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-050-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-051-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-052-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-053-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-054-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-055-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-056-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-057-000 1.0 123.48
075-089-058-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-001-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-002-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-003-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-004-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-005-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-006-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-007-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-008-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-009-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-010-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-011-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-012-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-013-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-014-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-015-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-016-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-017-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-018-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-019-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-020-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-021-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-022-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-023-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-024-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-025-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-026-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-027-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-028-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-029-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-030-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-031-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-032-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-033-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-034-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-035-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-036-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-037-000 1.0 123.48

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 21 of 23 APN EBU Charge
075-090-038-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-039-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-040-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-041-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-042-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-043-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-044-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-045-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-046-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-047-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-048-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-049-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-050-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-051-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-052-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-053-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-054-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-055-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-056-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-057-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-058-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-059-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-060-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-061-000 1.0 123.48
075-090-063-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-001-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-002-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-003-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-004-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-005-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-006-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-007-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-008-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-009-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-010-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-011-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-012-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-013-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-014-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-015-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-016-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-017-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-018-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-019-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-020-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-021-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-022-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-023-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-024-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-025-000 1.0 123.48

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 22 of 23 APN EBU Charge
075-095-026-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-027-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-028-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-029-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-030-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-031-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-032-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-033-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-034-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-035-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-036-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-037-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-038-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-039-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-040-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-041-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-042-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-043-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-044-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-045-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-046-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-047-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-048-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-049-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-050-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-051-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-052-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-053-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-054-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-055-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-056-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-057-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-058-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-059-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-060-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-061-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-062-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-063-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-064-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-065-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-066-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-067-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-068-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-069-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-070-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-071-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-072-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-073-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-074-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-075-000 1.0 123.48

City of Riverbank
2026/2027 Storm Drain District No. 05-1 Sterling Ridge Page 23 of 23 APN EBU Charge
075-095-076-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-077-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-078-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-079-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-080-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-081-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-082-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-083-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-084-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-085-000 1.0 123.48
075-095-086-000 1.0 123.48
Total 361.0 $44,576.28
*Total may differ from budget due to rounding.

Item 10.1. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LRA BOARD
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.1.

SECTION : NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: 6/9/2026
Subject: Workshop - Fiscal Year 2026-27 Major Fund Budget From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Tammy Alcantor, Assistant City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council receive a presentation on the Fiscal Year 2026-27 Major Fund Proposed Budgets and provide feedback in anticipation of the adoption of the Final Budget on June 23, 2026.

SUMMARY
An overview of the proposed Fiscal Year 2026-27 Major Fund budget will be presented to the City Council in anticipation of the adoption of the preliminary budget. This is an opportunity for the City Council to review ongoing annual expenditures (also referred to as the Base Budget) as well as review capital requests from each of the departments. Major funds include: General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, Sewer Operating Fund, Water Operating Fund, Recreation Fund, and Public Benefit Fund.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This item supports the Strategic Plan goal of Prioritizing Financial Stability by facilitating discussion and policy direction regarding budgetary challenges, reserve adequacy, expenditure controls, and revenue enhancement opportunities necessary to improve the City's long-term fiscal sustainability.

BACKGROUND
With support from various City departments, the Proposed Major Fund Budgets for Fiscal Year 2026- 27 were developed. Revenue projections were prepared by the Assistant City Manager, utilizing a combination of data from the California Department of Finance, input from consultants, and historical trends and experiences specific to the City. Department Heads and Managers were responsible for preparing base budget projections for ongoing revenues and expenditures.

Some notable increases affecting the Major Funds. The City’s PERS Unfunded Accrued Liability Costs have risen this fiscal year.
• In the upcoming fiscal year, we will experience a 10.06% increase in costs, resulting in the City contributing approximately $970,291 this fiscal year, with nearly half of that being paid directly by the General Fund.
• In the upcoming fiscal year, we will experience a 2.5% increase, $33,553 in costs, for Workers' Compensation, Vehicle and Property Insurance, and Liability coverage.

GENERAL FUND RESERVE PROJECTIONS

Item 10.1. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
The General Fund is anticipated to end the current 2025-26 Fiscal Year with a 46.1% Reserve.

Projections for the Proposed 2026-27 Fiscal Year are as follows:

GENERAL FUND REVENUE PROJECTIONS
Overall, General Fund Revenues, when compared to FY 2025-26 budgeted revenues, will experience an increase of 12.55%.

Property Tax
Revenue sources such as Property Tax will continue to increase as the market continues to be steady, particularly as new properties are added to the city's tax roll. The Property Tax Department of the State Board of Equalization has notified the County Assessor’s office that they may prepare their 2026 assessment roll with an inflationary factor of 2.02%. The revenues are based on Assessed Values that are set by the County Assessor as of January 1, 2026, along with an increase for new home construction.

With the new commercial and housing developments both completed and currently underway, Assessed Valuations will increase, resulting in higher revenues for the City. Current developments underway are Crossroads West Commercial, Crossroads West 2 – KB Homes, River’s Edge, Elmwood Estates, and Heritage II. For FY 26-27, revenues have been estimated to increase 4%.

Construction-related fees typically accompany new development. Over the past several years, increased activity in new construction for both commercial and housing, along with ongoing issuance of solar permits, has driven growth in Building Permit Revenue. Building permit revenue has been proposed with a 3% increase.

FY 2025-26
Budget
FY 2026-27
Proposed Budget
Difference % Change
Revenues $14,257,388 $16,046,743 $1,789,355 12.55%

Item 10.1. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
Sales Tax
Sales Tax revenue has generally increased over the past several fiscal years. In the current fiscal year, the City has experienced a continued increase in Sales Tax collections, driven in part by continued growth within the local retail sector and the opening of new commercial businesses.

For the upcoming fiscal year, the City anticipates continued growth in Sales Tax revenue as retail activity expands and commercial development matures. Historically, the Finance Department has taken a conservative approach when forecasting Sales Tax revenue. The City's sales tax consultant, MuniServices/Avenu, provides revenue projections under Conservative, Most-Likely, and Optimistic scenarios. Consistent with past practice, the City develops its budget using projections that generally fall between the Conservative and Most-Likely scenarios to ensure fiscal stability and avoid reliance on revenues that may not materialize.

While Sales Tax remains one of the City's most significant revenue sources, it is also one of the most sensitive to economic conditions and consumer spending trends. Based on current economic indicators, local retail activity, and consultant projections, the City estimates Sales Tax revenue will increase by approximately 25% during the upcoming fiscal year.

A portion of the additional Sales Tax generated within the Crossroads West Commercial Center is subject to a Sales Tax Sharing and Reimbursement Agreement with the developer. Under this agreement, eligible infrastructure and public improvement costs associated with the development are reimbursed through a share of the Sales Tax generated within the project area. As a result, not all growth in Sales Tax revenue will be available for general governmental purposes.

GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURE PROJECTIONS
Overall, for the upcoming fiscal year, expenditures are anticipated to increase by 11.10%.

FY 2025-26 Budget FY 2026-27
Proposed Budget
Difference % Change
$16,848,902 $18,719,682 $1,870,780 11.10%
Salary & Benefit Projections
The City currently has two labor agreements in place: one with the LIUNA Miscellaneous Bargaining

Item 10.1. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
Unit and one with the Mid-Management Employee Unit.

The LIUNA agreement, approved in September 2025, included a 4% Cost-of-Living Adjustment (COLA) effective September 19, 2025, and a 3% COLA effective July 2026. The July 2026 COLA has been incorporated into the proposed budget. The agreement is scheduled to expire on June 30, 2027.

The Mid-Management Employee Unit agreement, approved in January 2026, included a 4% COLA effective January 2026, as well as a one-time, non-PERSable lump-sum payment of $1,000 per employee effective the first full pay period in January 2026 and July 2026. Effective the first full pay period in January 2027, employees will receive an additional 4% COLA, which has been incorporated into the proposed budget. This agreement is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2028.

In addition, the City completed a Classification and Compensation Study conducted by Evergreen Solutions, LLC. On April 28, 2026, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-028 accepting and implementing the study's recommendations. The estimated financial impact of implementation was approximately $211,264.

The City's CalPERS Unfunded Accrued Liability (UAL) contribution increased by 10.06% for the current fiscal year, resulting in a total contribution of $970,291, with nearly half of the cost being paid by the General Fund. Pension costs continue to place significant pressure on the City's operating budget and are expected to remain a key financial consideration in future years.

Health insurance costs are projected to increase by approximately 10% in the upcoming fiscal year based on historical trends and current market conditions. Under existing labor agreements, employees contribute 15% toward their monthly health insurance premiums, helping to offset a portion of the annual cost increases.

Personnel
The proposed budget includes the promotion of an existing staff member to the following positions:
• Construction Inspector II
This promotion reflects the employees' demonstrated competencies, successful completion of relevant training programs, and continued dedication to professional growth. Recognizing and advancing staff based on their skills and development efforts supports both employee retention and the operational efficiency of the department.

No new positions have been included in the proposed budget. As the City continues to grow and service demands increase, several departments have identified staffing needs to assist with increased workloads and to maintain service levels. In addition, the City's operations are spread across multiple facilities, creating challenges in providing consistent customer service coverage and administrative support.

Several requests for additional staffing were submitted during the budget development process and were carefully evaluated. However, due to competing budget priorities and the City's commitment to maintaining long-term fiscal stability. The following positions were requested but are not included in the proposed budget:
• Deputy City Clerk (Administration) ($189,000 annual cost with benefits)

Item 10.1. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
• Engineering Technician II (Development Services Administration) ($168,000 annual cost with benefits)
• Administrative Clerk (Finance, Planning, Building & Code Enforcement) ($144,500 annual cost with benefits)
• Recreation and Event Coordinator (Recreation) ($158,760 annual cost with benefits) While these positions would provide valuable support for City operations, customer service, project management, and program delivery, current fiscal constraints and resource limitations do not support their inclusion in the FY 2026–27 budget. Staff recognizes the operational needs identified by departments and will continue to assess staffing requirements as the City grows and service demands evolve. These positions may be reconsidered in future budget cycles as financial conditions and facility resources allow.

The proposed budget balances current service demands with the City's commitment to maintaining long-term financial stability and preserving reserve levels.

Police Services
Cost increases for the Law Enforcement Contract with the Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Department include:
• Salary & Benefits: 4.5% Increase
• Vehicle & Replacement Costs: 3% increase
• SR 911 Dispatch: 8.65% increase
Overall, the police services budget has increased 3.74%.

Not included in the proposed budget is an additional deputy position for patrol, which was part of the plan presented by Chief Ridenour in January 2026.

For an additional Deputy, the cost would be $285,084 and is broken down as follows:
• $160,350 - Annual salary expense
• $113,734 - Vehicle purchase
• $11,000 - One-time costs (radio, vest, etc.)
Capital Expenditures
Staff is proposing funding from General Fund Reserves for the following projects:

Project Amount
City Hall North & South FOB Access $12,200
HR Analyst New Workstation $5,000
Carpet Cleaner $4,800
Playground Maintenance/Part Replacements $21,100
ADA Improvements $50,000
Staff is proposing funding from the Facility Improvement Fund:

Item 10.1. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
Project Amount
Community Center Camera & Security System $6,540
Scout Hall Camera & Security System $4,285
Scout Hall Reflooring $15,900
Several other capital expenditures were requested but not included in the proposed budget. Here are a few of those items:
• Backhoe (Parks) $77,200
• Repainting of City Hall North $30,250
• Repainting of Community Center Gazebo $20,790
• City Hall North & South Security System Upgrades $12,750 One-Time Expenditures
The proposed budget includes the following one-time expenditures:
• City Council Governance Training – $18,500
The training will provide guidance on governance best practices, roles and responsibilities, ethics, and effective collaboration between elected officials and staff. This investment supports informed decision-making and effective leadership.
• Executive Management Team Building - $15,500
This initiative is intended to strengthen communication, collaboration, and coordination among executive staff, supporting effective leadership and efficient delivery of City services. • Muni Permits System Improvements - $25,000
Funding is included for a core upgrade to the City's permitting system. The current Microsoft Access-based platform is aging and requires modernization to improve functionality, workflow efficiency, and system reliability. Regular upgrades are recommended to maintain compatibility with evolving Microsoft technologies and support ongoing operations. • Muni Permits Web Portal - $50,000
Funding is included for the implementation of a public-facing web portal that will allow residents and developers to submit applications, upload documents, request inspections, and track permit status online. The portal will improve customer service, increase accessibility, streamline permit processing, and reduce administrative workload. • Caselle Community Connect Payment Portal - $3,200
Staff is proposing a transition from Xpress Bill Pay (XBP) to Caselle Community Connect, Caselle's integrated payment platform. The proposed cost represents the additional annual expense above the City's current XBP service. Caselle has notified the City that it will be transitioning away from its partnership with XBP, resulting in the gradual elimination of automated payment processing functions. Migrating to Community Connect will maintain

Item 10.1. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
system integration, reduce manual processing, improve operational efficiency, and enhance the customer payment experience.
• Open Gov Disclosure Studio - $15,000
Staff is requesting the addition of OpenGov's Disclosure Studio module to enhance the City's financial reporting capabilities. The platform will assist with the preparation of the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR), quarterly financial reports, and other recurring financial reporting requirements by creating a single, integrated source for financial statements, notes, and narrative disclosures. This will improve reporting accuracy, streamline report preparation, reduce staff workload, and support the City's goal of providing more timely and transparent financial information to the City Council and the public. The requested $15,000 represents a one-time implementation cost, with an ongoing annual software subscription and maintenance cost of $25,996.

General Fund Subsidies
The General Fund has historically provided subsidies to support a variety of City services and activities. Over the past several fiscal years, General Fund support has increased as programs have experienced funding reductions, rising operating costs, growing service demands, and increased maintenance needs. The table below summarizes General Fund subsidies by activity and illustrates how funding levels have changed over time.

Fund/Activity FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025
Budgeted
FYE 2026
Budget
FYE 2027
Proposed Budget
Difference FYE 2026 vs
FYE 2027 $ %
Recreation 544,190 640,628 837,669 934,336 869,445 (64,891) -7% Neighborhood
Improvement 8,662 120,000 120,677 157,124 200,000 42,876 27% Community Center 26,850 22,500 46,325 35,000 15,000 (20,000) -57% Gas Tax - Streets 177,011 213,789 340,036 441,731 448,108 6,377 2% Sierra House (new) - - - 366,005 361,508 (4,497) -1%
LRA (new) - - - 232,239 235,000 2,761 1%
Total Subsidy 756,713 996,917 1,344,707 2,166,435 2,129,061 (37,374) -2.78% While General Fund subsidies have increased significantly over the long term—from approximately $757,000 in FY 2022–23 to a proposed $2.13 million in FY 2026–27—the proposed FY 2026–27 budget reflects a decrease of approximately 2.78% compared to FY 2025–26.

Recreation Fund
The Recreation Fund is primarily supported through a General Fund subsidy. The FY 2026–27 budget includes several maintenance and facility improvement projects related to the Community Gymnasium. Under the Joint Use Agreement with the School District, the City is responsible for 50%

Item 10.1. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
of the eligible maintenance and repair costs associated with the facility.

Project Amount
Gymnasium Restroom Drain $3,250
Gymnasium Exterior Light
Replacement
$1,089
Gymnasium Wall Seal/Paint $7,750
Gymnasium Door Crash Bar
Replacement
$5,767
Crowd Control Barricades $11,528
In addition to the planned maintenance projects, the School District has advised the City that the gymnasium HVAC system is nearing the end of its useful life. Although the system remains operational, the District has indicated that replacement may be necessary in the near future if the unit experiences a significant failure. The City has received an informal replacement estimate ranging from $68,000 to $72,000, with the City's anticipated share estimated at approximately $34,000 to $36,000. While no funding has been included in the FY 2026–27 budget for this project, staff will continue to monitor the condition of the system and evaluate funding options should replacement become necessary.

Gas Tax
The State of California imposes per-gallon excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel, sales taxes on these fuels, and vehicle registration fees, with portions of the resulting revenue dedicated to transportation purposes. Local (city and county) allocations from these sources are distributed primarily through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA)—a longstanding source of gas tax revenue—and the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), which was established by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (SB1 - Beall).

The State provides annual projections for these revenue sources. For the current fiscal year, the City is projected to receive a slight increase of 1.6% in Gas Tax revenues. These funds support street and road maintenance and operations, as well as major infrastructure projects funded through SB1.

FY 2025-26
Budget
FY 2026-27
Proposed Budget
Difference % Change
Revenues
(w/o transfers In)
$1,894,774 $1,952,907 $58,133 +3.07%
Expenditures
(w/o Capital Projects $1,184,322 $1,240,888 $56,558 +4.78% Personnel
The proposed budget includes the promotion of an existing staff member to the following position:
• Maintenance Worker II (position is split between Streets & Sewer) This promotion reflects the employees' demonstrated competencies, successful completion of relevant training programs, and continued dedication to professional growth. Recognizing and

Item 10.1. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
advancing staff based on their skills and development efforts supports both employee retention and the operational efficiency of the department. This position is allocated between the Streets and Sewer divisions. No new positions are proposed in the FY 2026–27 budget.

Gas Tax Maintenance Budget Deficit
Over the past four fiscal years, the Gas Tax Fund has consistently experienced a deficit within its Maintenance budget. This ongoing structural imbalance is primarily attributable to rising costs for supplies, materials, and maintenance activities, which have outpaced available Gas Tax revenues.

For FY 2026–27, staff estimates a Maintenance budget shortfall of approximately $448,108. To maintain current service levels and roadway maintenance activities, a transfer from the General Fund is anticipated. The proposed FY 2026–27 budget includes a General Fund subsidy that is approximately 2% higher than the FY 2025–26 budgeted contribution.

Sewer Operating Fund
The Sewer Fund receives approximately 99% of its revenue from user fees charged to residential, commercial, and industrial customers. Based on current trends and the fee schedule adopted in January 2023, which includes annual rate adjustments, Sewer Fund revenues are projected to increase by 4.10% in FY 2026–27. Operating expenditures, excluding transfers and capital projects, are anticipated to increase by 10.61%.

Personnel
The proposed budget includes the promotion of an existing staff member to the following position:
• Maintenance Worker II (position is split between Streets & Sewer) This promotion reflects the employees' demonstrated competencies, successful completion of relevant training programs, and continued dedication to professional growth. Recognizing and advancing staff based on their skills and development efforts supports both employee retention and the operational efficiency of the department. This position is allocated between the Streets and Sewer divisions. No new positions are proposed in the FY 2026–27 budget.

Capital Projects/Equipment
The Sewer Fund will support several projects and equipment purchases aimed at maintaining and improving the reliability of the City's wastewater collection and treatment systems. These investments are intended to address ongoing maintenance needs, improve operational efficiency, and protect critical infrastructure.

FY 2025-26
Budget
FY 2026-27
Proposed
Budget
Difference % Change
Revenues $8,387,870 $8,732,189 $344,319 +4.10%
Expenditures
(w/o transfers out & Capital
projects) $3,821,495 $4,226,798 $405,303 +10.61%

Item 10.1. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
Included in the FY 2026–27 proposed budget are:
• Replacement UTV - $27,000
• SCADA/Radio Upgrades - $100,000
• System repairs and upgrades - $45,000
• Sewer Line Replacement (Alley between Sierra Avenue and Patterson Road, First Street to Eighth Street) – $875,000 (carryover from FY 2025–26) Several additional capital needs were identified during the budget process but are not included in the proposed budget at this time due to funding constraints and competing priorities. These projects will continue to be evaluated as part of future budget discussions and long-term capital planning efforts. • Aerial Truck (Boom Truck) - $60,000 deposit, 2,800 monthly Lease (split between Sewer and Water Funds)
• Aeration Basin Sludge Removal – $300,000
• Replacement of 2003 Ag Tractor (STX) – $950,000 (currently experiencing ongoing maintenance issues)
• Equipment and Vehicle Storage Covering – $65,000 (split between the Sewer and Water Fund
Water Operating Fund
The Water Fund derives approximately 98% of its revenue from user fees charged to customers. For FY 2026–27, the City anticipates an overall revenue increase of 6.47%, primarily driven by growth in the customer base. Water rates have not been adjusted since 2019. To evaluate the long-term financial sustainability of the utility and identify future funding needs, staff completed a Request for Proposals process and selected a consultant to conduct a comprehensive Water Rate Study during FY 2026–27.

On the expenditure side, operating costs are projected to increase by 2.69%, primarily due to increases in personnel costs, services, and supplies.

FY 2025-26
Budget
FY 2026-27
Proposed
Budget
Difference % Change
Revenues
(w/o transfer In) $3,599,500 $3,832,500 +$233,000 +6.47% Expenditures
(w/o transfers out & capital
projects) $4,131,183 $4,242,383 +$111,200 +2.69%
Personnel
The proposed budget includes the promotion of existing staff members to the following positions:
• Senior Water Distribution Operator

Item 10.1. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
This promotion reflects the employees' demonstrated competencies, successful completion of relevant training programs, and continued dedication to professional growth. Recognizing and advancing staff based on their skills and development efforts supports both employee retention and the operational efficiency of the department.

No new positions are included in the proposed budget. During the budget development process, staff evaluated a request for an additional position; however, due to competing budget priorities and the City's commitment to maintaining long-term fiscal stability, the following position is not recommended for FY 2026–27:
• Water Meter Technician ($157,000 annual cost with benefits) While this position would provide additional support for water system operations and maintenance, current resource limitations do not support its inclusion in the proposed budget. Staff recognizes the operational need and will continue to evaluate this position as part of future budget discussions and workforce planning efforts.

Capital Projects/Equipment
The Water Fund will support several projects focused on maintaining the reliability, safety, and efficiency of the City's water system infrastructure.

Included in the FY 2026–27 proposed budget are:
• SCADA Software Upgrades – $12,000
• Chlorine Equipment for Multiple Well Sites – $10,000
• Tree Removal at Two Well Sites (Safety Concerns) – $10,000 • Interior Inspection and Cleaning of Two Water Storage Tanks – $12,000 • Second Street Water Storage Tank Exterior Painting – $15,000 • Annual Well Rehab: $85,000
Several additional capital needs were identified during the budget process but are not included in the proposed budget at this time due to funding constraints and competing priorities. These projects will continue to be evaluated through future budget discussions and long-term capital planning efforts. • Aerial Truck (Boom Truck) - $60,000 deposit, 2,800 monthly Lease (split between Sewer and Water Funds)
• Well 7 Vault (4 x 7) access chlorine lines – $28,000
• Second Street Water Storage Tank Iron Fencing - $50,000 • Equipment and Vehicle Storage Covering – $65,000 (shared between the Sewer and Water Funds)

PUBLIC BENEFIT FUND
In June 2018, the City Council authorized the creation of the Public Benefit Fund. The fund intended to ensure that all cannabis-related revenues were segregated and easily accounted for in a specific fund. In addition to establishing the fund, the City Council developed an expenditure policy that was

Item 10.1. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
focused on allocating the funds received for public safety (including police and code enforcement) and other projects that would provide a public benefit.

The City is currently collecting revenues from three cannabis facilities; Flavors, Canna+Rise and Off the Charts (previously Perfect Union, Riverbank Cannabis Collective). The current agreements are up for negotiation. For the new fiscal year, we are estimating a slight increase in both revenues and expenditures.

FY 2025-26
Budget
FY 2026-27
Proposed
Budget
Difference % Change
Revenues $446,000 $484,000 +$38,000 +8.52%
Expenditures $644,250 $660,000 +$15,750 +2.44%
The upcoming fiscal year includes only those ongoing expenses of the fund, including offsets for the Sheriff’s Law Enforcement Contract, Code Enforcement, and annual lease payments for the City’s Camera System.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact anticipated with this report. Staff will incorporate any final feedback from the City Council and present a final budget at the June 23, 2026, meeting.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Fiscal Year 2026-27 General Fund Proposed Budget

2. Fiscal Year 2026-27 Gas Tax Fund Proposed Budget

3. Fiscal Year 2026-27 Sewer Funds Proposed Budget

4. Fiscal Year 2026-27 Water Funds Proposed Budget

5. Fiscal Year 2026-27 Public Benefit Fund Proposed Budget

General Fund
The General Fund is the primary operating fund of the City and supports the majority of basic municipal services.

It accounts for resources that are not legally restricted to specific uses and provides funding for essential services such as public safety, parks and recreation, public works, planning, and general government operations.

The primary sources of revenue for the General Fund include property tax, sales tax, franchise fees, business license fees, and other general revenues. Because these revenues are not designated for specific purposes, they may be allocated at the discretion of the City Council to meet the community’s most critical needs and priorities.

The General Fund reflects the City’s fiscal health and its ability to provide core services that enhance the quality of life for residents and businesses.

General Fund Comprehensive Fund Summary
The 2026 Actual is the year-to-date amount as of June 1, 2026.

Comprehensive Fund Summary
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
Beginning Fund Balance $11,452,119.00 $10,708,952.00 $9,807,950.00 $9,807,950.00 $7,766,412.00 Revenues
Taxes $9,293,421.97 $10,491,090.80 $9,635,434.77 $10,621,981.75 $12,199,419.00 Licenses & Permits $840,054.84 $522,062.22 $643,119.43 $606,953.00 $624,478.50 Grants $186,158.96 $145,480.52 $201,536.61 $187,500.00 $180,000.00 Charges for Services $1,821,436.18 $2,094,479.11 $1,698,136.53 $1,448,837.52 $1,521,905.00 Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $57,063.54 $58,840.13 $53,984.48 $53,553.00 $53,553.00 Interest Income $199,557.15 $339,576.28 $223,105.36 $225,000.00 $240,000.00 Transfers In $2,598,543.73 $998,829.32 - $1,113,563.00 $1,227,387.00 Total Revenues $14,996,236.37 $14,650,358.38 $12,455,317.18 $14,257,388.27 $16,046,742.50 Expenditures
Payroll Benefits $1,783,164.84 $1,401,451.22 $1,310,107.02 $1,986,386.64 $2,090,514.35 Salary $2,785,757.88 $2,054,802.24 $2,101,428.79 $2,618,294.50 $2,953,709.41 Professional Services $8,139,723.00 $8,330,113.13 $6,575,718.26 $8,992,340.21 $9,433,961.04 Services/ Supplies $1,093,763.09 $477,505.89 $369,401.41 $523,976.81 $564,758.84 Utilities $201,569.09 $197,928.86 $139,135.41 $219,929.63 $184,491.00 Capital Expenses/ Projects $249,436.13 $953,157.83 $227,651.02 $274,503.01 $119,254.00 Prior Year Adjustments $650.00 -$25,897.72 -$12,626.38 - - Transfers Out $1,485,339.63 $1,410,781.29 $44,248.04 $2,233,471.04 $3,372,993.00 Total Expenditures $15,739,403.66 $14,799,842.74 $10,755,063.57 $16,848,901.85 $18,719,681.64 Total Revenues Less Expenditures -$743,167.29 -$149,484.36 $1,700,253.61 -$2,591,513.58 -$2,672,939.14 Ending Fund Balance $10,708,951.71 $10,559,467.64 $11,508,203.61 $7,216,436.42 $5,093,472.86 General Fund 101
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 7

General Fund Summary
Revenues vs Expenditures Summary
Revenues by Revenue Source
Historical Revenue by Revenue Source
Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties Grants Interest Income
Licenses & Permits Transfers In Charges for Services
Taxes
Revenue Actual Revenue Surplus Revenue Budgeted
Expenditures Actual Expenditures Over Budget Expenditures Budgeted 2025 2026 2027
0 $5M
$10M
$15M
$20M
$15M
$12M
$16M
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $5M
$10M
$15M
$20M
General Fund 101
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 8

FY27 Revenues by Revenue Source
Taxes $12,199,419 76.02%
Charges for Services $1,521,905 9.48%
Transfers In $1,227,387 7.65%
Licenses & Permits $624,479 3.89%
Interest Income $240,000 1.50%
Grants $180,000 1.12%
Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $53,553 0.33%
For the General Fund 101, the fiscal year revenue by revenue source is primarily composed of Taxes, which account for $12.2 million or 76.02% of the total revenue. Charges for Services contribute $1.5 million, representing 9.48%. Transfers In provide $1.2 million, making up 7.65% of the revenue. Licenses & Permits add $624,479, which is 3.89%. Interest Income amounts to $240,000 or 1.5%, while Grants contribute $180,000, equating to 1.12%. Lastly, Fines, Forfeitures, and Penalties total $53,553, comprising 0.33% of the revenue.

Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid Year
Final Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Taxes $9,293,421.97 $10,491,090.80 $9,635,434.77 $10,621,981.75 $12,199,419.00 14.85% Licenses & Permits $840,054.84 $522,062.22 $643,119.43 $606,953.00 $624,478.50 2.89% Grants $186,158.96 $145,480.52 $201,536.61 $187,500.00 $180,000.00 -4.00% Charges for Services $1,821,436.18 $2,094,479.11 $1,698,136.53 $1,448,837.52 $1,521,905.00 5.04% Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $57,063.54 $58,840.13 $53,984.48 $53,553.00 $53,553.00 - Interest Income $199,557.15 $339,576.28 $223,105.36 $225,000.00 $240,000.00 6.67% Transfers In $2,598,543.73 $998,829.32 - $1,113,563.00 $1,227,387.00 10.22% Total Revenues $14,996,236.37 $14,650,358.38 $12,455,317.18 $14,257,388.27 $16,046,742.50 12.55% 16M
Revenues by Revenue Source
General Fund 101
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 9

Expenditures by Department
Historical Expenditures by Department
Economic Development Legal Department Building Maintenance City Manager Building Department Animal & Code Control
Storm Water Administration Recreation Finance Department Planning Department City Council Development Services Admin Admin Services Parks Police Department
FY27 Expenditures by Department
Police Department $7,512,467 40.13%
City Council $2,035,726 10.87%
Parks $1,419,774 7.58%
Admin Services $1,333,558 7.12%
Recreation $906,411 4.84%
Development Services Admin $906,131 4.84%
Planning Department $897,046 4.79%
Finance Department $778,254 4.16%
City Manager $589,341 3.15%
Storm Water Administration $582,131 3.11%
Animal & Code Control $566,966 3.03%
Building Department $559,550 2.99%
Building Maintenance $357,326 1.91%
Legal Department $250,000 1.34%
Economic Development $25,000 0.13%
$15M
$11M
$19M
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $5M
$10M
$15M
$20M

18.7M
General Fund 101
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 10

Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid Year
Final Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Finance Department $1,100,466.59 $618,656.31 $550,039.65 $747,031.53 $778,253.71 4.18% Parks $1,217,291.18 $1,311,104.61 $1,058,349.13 $1,439,137.46 $1,419,774.28 -1.35% Recreation $640,627.53 $811,768.00 $22,124.04 $1,036,372.04 $906,411.00 -12.54% Planning Department $610,910.30 $619,467.23 $624,088.42 $768,445.57 $897,045.91 16.74% Animal & Code Control $385,806.77 $546,344.88 $262,338.35 $489,489.00 $566,966.00 15.83% Economic Development $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 - City Council $607,410.60 $180,057.73 $214,956.42 $803,391.38 $2,035,726.14 153.39% City Manager $340,864.09 $281,634.10 $305,679.00 $474,575.63 $589,341.38 24.18% Legal Department $2,064,796.79 $113,097.87 $140,132.39 $250,000.00 $250,000.00 - Building Department $647,215.26 $418,291.25 $371,521.46 $489,772.79 $559,549.89 14.25% Building Maintenance $334,329.38 $288,413.20 $244,790.58 $366,938.59 $357,326.18 -2.62% Admin Services $977,106.90 $882,109.01 $875,052.80 $1,221,388.53 $1,333,558.10 9.18% Police Department $5,261,134.57 $6,828,951.19 $5,133,264.34 $7,241,452.00 $7,512,467.00 3.74% Development Services Admin $1,150,778.38 $1,013,241.15 $805,538.24 $902,785.21 $906,131.05 0.37% Storm Water Administration $375,665.32 $861,706.21 $122,188.75 $593,122.11 $582,131.00 -1.85% Total Expenditures $15,739,403.66 $14,799,842.74 $10,755,063.57 $16,848,901.85 $18,719,681.64 11.10% Expenditures by Department
General Fund 101
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 11

General Fund Subsidy to other Funds/Activities
Fund/Activity FYE 2023 FYE 2024 FYE 2025
Budgeted
FYE 2026
Budget
FYE 2027
Proposed Budget
Recreation 544,190 640,628 837,669 934,336 869,445 (64,891) -7% Neighborhood
Improvement 120,000 8,662 120,677 157,124 200,000 (42,876) -27% Community Center 22,500 26,850 46,325 35,000 15,000 (20,000) -57% Gas Tax - Streets 177,011 213,789 340,036 441,731 448,108 6,377 2% Sierra House (new) - - - 366,005 361,508 (4,497) -1%
LRA (new) - - - 232,239 235,000 2,761 1%
Total Subsidy 756,713 996,917 1,344,707 2,166,435 2,129,061 (123,126) -9.16% General Fund Transfer Outs
To:

Fund/Activity
FYE 2027
Proposed Budget
Neighborhood
Improvement 43,932
Sys Development Sales Tax Cost Sharing Agreement Crossroads West 1,200,000 $ 1,243,932
Total Subsidy and Transfer Out General Fund $ 3,372,993 General Fund Transfers In
From:

Fund/Activity
FYE 2027
Proposed Budget
Sewer Operating 218,813.00
Water Operating 218,813.00
Sys Development 47,642
Public Safety
Augmentation 150,000
Lighting & Landscape
Districts 44,370
CFD 60,000
Sys Development 137,750
Public Benefit Fund 300,000
Crossroads
Landscape/Lighting
District 50,000
Total Transfer In $ 1,227,388
Total Transfer Out
Adminstration Fees for management of Districts
Cover cost of Parks & Staff personnel for maintenance of district.

Management Fee for Community Development Specialist
II
Cover cost of 2 positions in Public Safety
Cover cost of Parks & Staff personnel for maintenance of district.

Description
Management fee for: City Manager, Assistant City
Manager, City Clerk and Executive Assistant. 25% of
Annual Salary & Benefits
Management fee for: City Manager, Assistant City
Manager, City Clerk and Executive Assistant. 25% of
Annual Salary & Benefits
Management fee for: Assistant Finance Director 20% of
Annual Salary & Benefits
Supplement Public Safety Cost
Difference FYE 2026 vs FYE
2027
$ %
Fleet for Services
Description

Gas Tax Fund 102
The State of California levies per-gallon excise taxes on gasoline and diesel fuel, as well as sales taxes on these fuels and registration fees on motor vehicles. Revenue from these taxes is designated for transportation-related purposes. The local city and county shares are distributed through the Highway Users Tax Account (HUTA) and the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), which manages a significant portion of the funds generated by the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (commonly known as SB1).

Gas Tax Fund Comprehensive Fund Summary
Comprehensive Fund Summary
Category
FY 2024
Actual
FY 2025
Actual
FY 2026
Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
Beginning Fund Balance $504,474.00 $408,837.00 $515,630.00 $515,630.00 $1,226,080.00 Revenues
Taxes $677,568.30 $702,527.19 $591,941.70 $750,352.00 $762,551.00 Charges for Services $634,229.17 $798,126.98 $542,703.85 $694,691.00 $736,248.00 Interest Income $8,311.87 $5,985.93 $7,700.97 $8,000.00 $6,000.00 Transfers In $597,624.82 $370,529.00 - $441,731.00 $448,108.00 Total Revenues $1,917,734.16 $1,877,169.10 $1,142,346.52 $1,894,774.00 $1,952,907.00 Expenditures
Payroll Benefits $257,401.48 $231,395.73 $222,174.18 $328,565.64 $323,778.23 Salary $376,449.05 $293,905.51 $295,538.71 $425,796.51 $433,998.66 Professional Services $298,761.27 $296,471.99 $208,799.04 $194,810.10 $216,325.50 Services/ Supplies $62,204.93 $81,827.95 $105,189.22 $83,650.00 $115,050.00 Utilities $135,051.84 $141,048.22 $113,497.92 $151,500.00 $151,728.00 Capital Expenses/ Projects $781,572.17 $691,860.83 $22,627.68 $1,071,406.00 $1,880,445.00 Transfers Out $101,931.18 $33,866.00 - - -
Total Expenditures $2,013,371.92 $1,770,376.23 $967,826.75 $2,255,728.25 $3,121,325.39 Total Revenues Less Expenditures -$95,637.76 $106,792.87 $174,519.77 -$360,954.25 -$1,168,418.39 Ending Fund Balance $408,836.24 $515,629.87 $690,149.77 $154,675.75 $57,661.61 Gas Tax 102
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 13

Gas Tax Fund Summary
Revenues vs Expenditures Summary
Revenues by Revenue Source
Historical Revenue by Revenue Source
Interest Income Transfers In Taxes
Charges for Services
Revenue Actual Revenue Surplus Revenue Budgeted
Expenditures Actual Expenditures Budgeted
2025 2026 2027
0 $1M
$2M
$3M
$4M
$2M
$1M
$2M
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $1M
$2M
$3M
Gas Tax 102
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 14

FY27 Revenues by Revenue Source
Taxes $762,551 39.05%
Charges for Services $736,248 37.70%
Transfers In $448,108 22.95%
Interest Income $6,000 0.31%
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Taxes $677,568.30 $702,527.19 $591,941.70 $750,352.00 $762,551.00 1.63% Charges for Services $634,229.17 $798,126.98 $542,703.85 $694,691.00 $736,248.00 5.98% Interest Income $8,311.87 $5,985.93 $7,700.97 $8,000.00 $6,000.00 -25.00% Transfers In $597,624.82 $370,529.00 - $441,731.00 $448,108.00 1.44% Total Revenues $1,917,734.16 $1,877,169.10 $1,142,346.52 $1,894,774.00 $1,952,907.00 3.07% Expenditures by Department
Historical Expenditures by Department
Gas Tax

1.95M
Revenues by Revenue Source
$2M
$1M
$3M
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $1M
$2M
$3M
$4M
Gas Tax 102
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 15

FY27 Expenditures by Department
Gas Tax $3,121,325 100.00%
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual
FY 2026
Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Gas Tax $2,013,371.92 $1,770,376.23 $967,826.75 $2,255,728.25 $3,121,325.39 38.37% Total Expenditures $2,013,371.92 $1,770,376.23 $967,826.75 $2,255,728.25 $3,121,325.39 38.37%

3.12M
Expenditures by Department
Gas Tax 102
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 16

Sewer Enterprise Funds
The Sewer Funds support the operation, maintenance, and long-term sustainability of the City’s wastewater system. These funds ensure the safe collection, treatment, and disposal of wastewater in compliance with state and federal environmental regulations. The Sewer Funds are divided into the following key components:

Operations and Maintenance (O&M): This portion of the fund covers the day-to-day costs of running the City’s sewer system, including staffing, equipment, utilities, routine maintenance, inspections, and emergency repairs.

Debt Service: This fund is used to repay outstanding debt issued for major sewer infrastructure improvements, such as treatment plant upgrades or system expansions. Payments include both principal and interest and are scheduled according to bond or loan agreements.

Capital Outlay: This fund supports the planning, design, and construction of significant capital projects, such as replacing aging pipelines, upgrading pump stations, or expanding treatment capacity. Capital investments ensure the reliability, efficiency, and regulatory compliance of the wastewater system.

Sewer Connection Fee Fund: This fund accounts for fees paid by new customers to connect to the City’s water system. These fees help cover the cost of physical connections, meters, inspections, and other onetime services required to bring a property online.

System Development Fees (Sewer Impact Fees): These fees are collected from new development to fund infrastructure improvements required to accommodate system growth. These restricted funds help ensure that growth pays its fair share of system expansion costs, rather than burdening existing ratepayers.

Together, these funds enable the City to provide reliable wastewater services, protect public health and the environment, and plan for future capacity needs as the community grows.

Sewer Enterprise Funds Comprehensive Fund Summary
Comprehensive Fund Summary
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
Beginning Fund Balance $9,974,707.00 $11,238,764.70 $15,034,012.00 $15,034,012.00 $16,483,394.00 Revenues
Charges for Services $6,476,304.03 $8,637,741.81 $8,176,618.29 $8,277,870.00 $8,722,188.50 Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $160,605.78 $120,846.10 $1,468,924.09 $100,000.00 $95,000.00 Interest Income $52,877.96 $338,163.83 $261,164.22 $220,500.00 $187,500.00 Transfers In $1,801,000.33 $854,090.23 $1,616,405.63 $1,424,277.00 $1,422,250.00 Total Revenues $8,490,788.10 $9,950,841.97 $11,523,112.23 $10,022,647.00 $10,426,938.50 Expenditures
Payroll Benefits $383,283.84 $824,161.86 $698,828.26 $942,962.29 $1,125,574.73 Salary $536,337.67 $1,113,176.52 $1,072,852.41 $1,347,816.44 $1,550,539.98 Professional Services $606,440.03 $1,112,498.28 $851,266.52 $986,700.17 $1,002,528.00 Services/ Supplies $939,672.63 $1,269,029.71 $250,910.39 $878,926.00 $1,031,247.00 Utilities $289,687.10 $356,464.17 $227,240.61 $306,107.00 $312,571.00 Capital Expenses/ Projects -$79,898.75 $28,939.07 $5,481,974.97 $3,817,785.00 $1,545,000.00 Transfers Out $2,462,554.17 $921,985.88 $1,616,405.63 $1,724,846.50 $1,641,063.00 Total Expenditures $5,138,076.69 $5,626,255.49 $10,199,478.79 $10,005,143.40 $8,208,523.72 Total Revenues Less Expenditures $3,352,711.41 $4,324,586.48 $1,323,633.44 $17,503.60 $2,218,414.78 Ending Fund Balance $13,327,418.41 $15,563,351.18 $16,357,645.44 $15,051,515.60 $18,701,808.78 Sewer Enterprise Funds
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 7

Sewer Enterprise Funds Summary
Revenues vs Expenditures Summary
Revenues by Revenue Source
Historical Revenue by Revenue Source
Interest Income Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties Transfers In Charges for Services
Revenue Actual Revenue Surplus Revenue Budgeted
Expenditures Actual Expenditures Budgeted
2025 2026 2027
0 $3M
$5M
$8M
$10M
$13M
$10M
$12M
$10M
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $5M
$10M
$15M
Sewer Enterprise Funds
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 8

FY27 Revenues by Revenue Source
Charges for Services $8,722,189 83.65%
Transfers In $1,422,250 13.64%
Interest Income $187,500 1.80%
Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $95,000 0.91%
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid Year
Final Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Charges for Services $6,476,304.03 $8,637,741.81 $8,176,618.29 $8,277,870.00 $8,722,188.50 5.37% Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $160,605.78 $120,846.10 $1,468,924.09 $100,000.00 $95,000.00 -5.00% Interest Income $52,877.96 $338,163.83 $261,164.22 $220,500.00 $187,500.00 -14.97% Transfers In $1,801,000.33 $854,090.23 $1,616,405.63 $1,424,277.00 $1,422,250.00 -0.14% Total Revenues $8,490,788.10 $9,950,841.97 $11,523,112.23 $10,022,647.00 $10,426,938.50 4.03% Expenditures by Department
Historical Expenditures by Department
Sewer Capital Improvement Sewer Debt Service Sys Dev Wastewater Sewer Treatment (Wwtp) Sewer Collection

10.4M
Revenues by Revenue Source
$6M
$10M
$8M
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $5M
$10M
$15M
Sewer Enterprise Funds
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 9

FY27 Expenditures by Department
Sewer Collection $4,931,578 60.08%
Sewer Treatment (Wwtp) $2,431,283 29.62%
Sewer Debt Service $795,663 9.69%
Sewer Capital Improvement $50,000 0.61%
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid Year
Final Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Sewer Debt Service $237,961.46 $253,568.44 $165,670.01 $641,017.00 $795,663.00 24.13% Sewer Capital Improvement $6,192.70 $168,473.16 $696,849.00 $925,000.00 $50,000.00 -94.59% Sys Dev Wastewater - - $2,468,640.64 - - -
Sewer Collection $3,496,271.10 $3,057,743.56 $2,841,073.38 $5,661,572.18 $4,931,577.77 -12.89% Sewer Treatment (Wwtp) $1,397,651.43 $2,146,470.33 $4,027,245.76 $2,777,554.23 $2,431,282.95 -12.47% Total Expenditures $5,138,076.69 $5,626,255.49 $10,199,478.79 $10,005,143.40 $8,208,523.72 -17.96%

8.21M
Expenditures by Department
Sewer Enterprise Funds
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 10

Sewer Operating Fund 106
The General Fund serves as the City’s primary operating fund. It is used to account for all financial resources that are not specifically required to be recorded in a separate fund.

Sewer Operating Fund Comprehensive Fund Summary
Comprehensive Fund Summary
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
Beginning Fund Balance $8,883,444.00 $9,654,422.00 $11,536,220.00 $11,536,220.00 $5,199,115.00 Revenues
Charges for Services $6,151,285.59 $8,345,232.63 $7,972,013.58 $8,127,870.00 $8,522,188.50 Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $60,185.78 $70,886.10 $1,404,774.09 $60,000.00 $50,000.00 Interest Income $21,237.80 $274,551.80 $198,963.69 $200,000.00 $160,000.00 Transfers In $538,212.05 $104,561.00 - - -
Total Revenues $6,770,921.22 $8,795,231.53 $9,575,751.36 $8,387,870.00 $8,732,188.50 Expenditures
Payroll Benefits $383,283.84 $824,161.86 $698,828.26 $942,962.29 $1,125,574.73 Salary $536,337.67 $1,113,176.52 $1,072,852.41 $1,347,816.44 $1,550,539.98 Professional Services $606,440.03 $944,025.12 $791,266.52 $986,700.17 $1,002,528.00 Services/ Supplies $701,711.17 $1,015,461.27 $85,240.38 $237,909.00 $235,584.00 Utilities $289,687.10 $356,464.17 $227,240.61 $306,107.00 $312,571.00 Capital Expenses/ Projects -$86,091.45 $28,939.07 $3,013,334.33 $2,892,785.00 $1,495,000.00 Transfers Out $2,462,554.17 $921,985.88 $979,556.63 $1,724,846.50 $1,641,063.00 Total Expenditures $4,893,922.53 $5,204,213.89 $6,868,319.14 $8,439,126.40 $7,362,860.72 Total Revenues Less Expenditures $1,876,998.69 $3,591,017.64 $2,707,432.22 -$51,256.40 $1,369,327.78 Ending Fund Balance $10,760,442.69 $13,245,439.64 $14,243,652.22 $11,484,963.60 $6,568,442.78 Sewer Operating Fund 106
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 11

Sewer Operating Fund Summary
Revenues vs Expenditures Summary
Revenues by Revenue Source
Historical Revenue by Revenue Source
Transfers In Interest Income Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties Charges for Services
Revenue Actual Revenue Surplus Revenue Budgeted
Expenditures Actual Expenditures Over Budget Expenditures Budgeted 2025 2026 2027
0 $3M
$5M
$8M
$10M
$13M
$9M
$10M
$9M
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $3M
$5M
$8M
$10M
$13M
Sewer Operating Fund 106
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 12

FY27 Revenues by Revenue Source
Charges for Services $8,522,189 97.60%
Interest Income $160,000 1.83%
Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $50,000 0.57%
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Charges for Services $6,151,285.59 $8,345,232.63 $7,972,013.58 $8,127,870.00 $8,522,188.50 4.85% Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $60,185.78 $70,886.10 $1,404,774.09 $60,000.00 $50,000.00 -16.67% Interest Income $21,237.80 $274,551.80 $198,963.69 $200,000.00 $160,000.00 -20.00% Transfers In $538,212.05 $104,561.00 - - - -
Total Revenues $6,770,921.22 $8,795,231.53 $9,575,751.36 $8,387,870.00 $8,732,188.50 4.10% Expenditures by Department
Historical Expenditures by Department
Sewer Treatment (Wwtp) Sewer Collection

8.73M
Revenues by Revenue Source
$5M
$7M
$7M
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $3M
$5M
$8M
$10M
Sewer Operating Fund 106
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 13

FY27 Expenditures by Department
Sewer Collection $4,931,578 66.98%
Sewer Treatment (Wwtp) $2,431,283 33.02%
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Sewer Collection $3,496,271.10 $3,057,743.56 $2,841,073.38 $5,661,572.18 $4,931,577.77 -12.89% Sewer Treatment (Wwtp) $1,397,651.43 $2,146,470.33 $4,027,245.76 $2,777,554.23 $2,431,282.95 -12.47% Total Expenditures $4,893,922.53 $5,204,213.89 $6,868,319.14 $8,439,126.40 $7,362,860.72 -12.75%

7.36M
Expenditures by Department
Sewer Operating Fund 106
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 14

Water Enterprise Funds
The City’s Water Funds are used to manage and support the delivery of safe, reliable drinking water to residents and businesses. These funds are divided into specific categories to ensure accountability and long-term sustainability of the water system:

Water Operations Fund: This fund supports the daily operation and maintenance of the City’s water supply and distribution systems. Expenses include staffing, utilities, water treatment, system repairs, testing, regulatory compliance, and customer service functions.

Water Capital Improvement Fund: This fund is used to finance major infrastructure upgrades, replacements, and system expansions. Projects may include well development, water main replacements, storage facilities, and upgrades to ensure water quality and reliability. These projects are typically identified in the City’s capital improvement plan.

Water Connection Fee Fund: This fund accounts for fees paid by new customers to connect to the City’s water system. These fees help cover the cost of physical connections, meters, inspections, and other onetime services required to bring a property online.

Water System Development Fee Fund: This fund receives development impact fees collected from new construction to offset the costs of expanding the City’s water system. These fees are restricted in use and must be spent on infrastructure improvements that increase system capacity and ensure adequate service for future growth.

Together, these funds ensure the City's water system remains safe, efficient, and capable of supporting both current demands and future development.

Water Enterprise Funds Comprehensive Fund Summary
Comprehensive Fund Summary
Category
FY 2024
Actual
FY 2025
Actual
FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
Beginning Fund Balance $6,072,360.00 $7,080,596.00 $6,320,845.00 $6,320,845.00 $2,471,930.00 Revenues
Charges for Services $4,265,742.95 $4,090,181.51 $3,860,427.43 $3,940,500.00 $4,249,500.00 Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $62,215.87 $63,066.63 $68,122.51 $80,000.00 $68,000.00 Interest Income $72,689.91 $192,162.52 $130,018.89 $59,500.00 $70,500.00 Transfers In $520,236.06 $1,008,102.47 $416,666.65 $430,600.00 $250,000.00 Total Revenues $4,920,884.79 $5,353,513.13 $4,475,235.48 $4,510,600.00 $4,638,000.00 Expenditures
Payroll Benefits $355,745.82 $826,825.00 $685,321.84 $928,049.95 $1,012,619.98 Salary $545,043.96 $1,156,049.01 $1,132,996.71 $1,377,220.12 $1,389,822.41 Professional Services $437,309.28 $714,439.58 $574,639.23 $719,123.21 $740,875.00 Services/ Supplies $738,107.62 $753,861.62 $137,352.03 $629,463.50 $620,355.00 Utilities $414,090.46 $524,364.19 $375,813.49 $477,326.00 $478,711.00 Capital Expenses/ Projects $144,463.76 $45,467.76 $2,478,985.63 $1,518,853.00 $861,700.00 Transfers Out $1,509,669.05 $1,285,120.11 $416,666.65 $544,652.50 $468,813.00 Total Expenditures $4,144,429.95 $5,306,127.27 $5,801,775.58 $6,194,688.28 $5,572,896.40 Total Revenues Less Expenditures $776,454.84 $47,385.86 -$1,326,540.10 -$1,684,088.28 -$934,896.40 Ending Fund Balance $6,848,814.84 $7,127,981.86 $4,994,304.90 $4,636,756.72 $1,537,033.60 Water Enterprise Funds
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 7

Water Enterprise Funds Summary
Revenues vs Expenditures Summary
Revenues by Revenue Source
Historical Revenue by Revenue Source
Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties Interest Income Transfers In Charges for Services
Revenue Actual Revenue Surplus Revenue Budgeted
Expenditures Actual Expenditures Budgeted
2025 2026 2027
0 $2M
$4M
$6M
$8M
$5M
$4M $5M
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $2M
$4M
$6M
Water Enterprise Funds
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 8

FY27 Revenues by Revenue Source
Charges for Services $4,249,500 91.62%
Transfers In $250,000 5.39%
Interest Income $70,500 1.52%
Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $68,000 1.47%
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Charges for Services $4,265,742.95 $4,090,181.51 $3,860,427.43 $3,940,500.00 $4,249,500.00 7.84% Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $62,215.87 $63,066.63 $68,122.51 $80,000.00 $68,000.00 -15.00% Interest Income $72,689.91 $192,162.52 $130,018.89 $59,500.00 $70,500.00 18.49% Transfers In $520,236.06 $1,008,102.47 $416,666.65 $430,600.00 $250,000.00 -41.94% Total Revenues $4,920,884.79 $5,353,513.13 $4,475,235.48 $4,510,600.00 $4,638,000.00 2.82% Expenditures by Department
Historical Expenditures by Department
Water Connection Water Capital Improvements Sys Dev Water Imprv Water Collection

4.64M
Revenues by Revenue Source
$5M
$6M $6M
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $2M
$4M
$6M
$8M
Water Enterprise Funds
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 9

FY27 Expenditures by Department
Water Collection $4,831,196 86.69%
Water Capital Improvements $741,700 13.31%
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Water Connection $648.38 $3,978.38 - $300,000.00 - -100.00% Water Capital Improvements $67,565.95 $303,685.78 $57,629.41 $1,170,000.00 $741,700.00 -36.61% Sys Dev Water Imprv $235,347.21 $691,864.26 $2,317,334.14 $118,853.00 - -100.00% Water Collection $3,840,868.41 $4,306,598.85 $3,426,812.03 $4,605,835.28 $4,831,196.40 4.89% Total Expenditures $4,144,429.95 $5,306,127.27 $5,801,775.58 $6,194,688.28 $5,572,896.40 -10.04%

5.57M
Expenditures by Department
Water Enterprise Funds
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 10

Water Operating Fund 114
The General Fund serves as the City’s primary operating fund. It is used to account for all financial resources that are not specifically required to be recorded in a separate fund.

Water Operating Fund Comprehensive Fund Summary
Comprehensive Fund Summary
Category
FY 2024
Actual
FY 2025
Actual
FY 2026
Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
Beginning Fund Balance $1,122,194.00 $1,124,329.00 $377,082.00 $377,082.00 -$333,871.00 Revenues
Charges for Services $3,217,388.35 $3,406,499.36 $2,805,668.55 $3,490,500.00 $3,749,500.00 Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $62,215.87 $63,066.63 $68,122.51 $80,000.00 $68,000.00 Interest Income $29,351.50 $38,115.40 $17,678.43 $29,000.00 $15,000.00 Transfers In $302,913.16 $914,239.14 - $75,000.00 -
Total Revenues $3,611,868.88 $4,421,920.53 $2,891,469.49 $3,674,500.00 $3,832,500.00 Expenditures
Payroll Benefits $355,745.82 $826,825.00 $685,321.84 $928,049.95 $1,012,619.98 Salary $545,043.96 $1,156,049.01 $1,132,996.71 $1,377,220.12 $1,389,822.41 Professional Services $437,309.28 $714,439.58 $574,639.23 $719,123.21 $740,875.00 Services/ Supplies $738,107.62 $753,861.62 $137,352.03 $629,463.50 $620,355.00 Utilities $414,090.46 $524,364.19 $375,813.49 $477,326.00 $478,711.00 Capital Expenses/ Projects $144,463.76 -$39,173.14 $104,022.08 $230,000.00 $120,000.00 Transfers Out $1,206,755.89 $370,880.97 $416,666.65 $244,652.50 $468,813.00 Total Expenditures $3,841,516.79 $4,307,247.23 $3,426,812.03 $4,605,835.28 $4,831,196.40 Total Revenues Less Expenditures -$229,647.91 $114,673.30 -$535,342.54 -$931,335.28 -$998,696.40 Ending Fund Balance $892,546.09 $1,239,002.30 -$158,260.54 -$554,253.28 -$1,332,567.40 Water Operating Fund 114
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 11

Water Operating Fund Summary
Revenues vs Expenditures Summary
Revenues by Revenue Source
Historical Revenue by Revenue Source
Interest Income Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties Transfers In Charges for Services
Revenue Actual Revenue Surplus Revenue Budgeted
Expenditures Actual Expenditures Over Budget Expenditures Budgeted 2025 2026 2027
0 $1M
$2M
$3M
$4M
$5M
$6M
$4M
$3M
$4M
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $2M
$4M
$6M
Water Operating Fund 114
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 12

FY27 Revenues by Revenue Source
Charges for Services $3,749,500 97.83%
Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $68,000 1.77%
Interest Income $15,000 0.39%
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Charges for Services $3,217,388.35 $3,406,499.36 $2,805,668.55 $3,490,500.00 $3,749,500.00 7.42% Fines, Forfeitures, Penalties $62,215.87 $63,066.63 $68,122.51 $80,000.00 $68,000.00 -15.00% Interest Income $29,351.50 $38,115.40 $17,678.43 $29,000.00 $15,000.00 -48.28% Transfers In $302,913.16 $914,239.14 - $75,000.00 - -100.00% Total Revenues $3,611,868.88 $4,421,920.53 $2,891,469.49 $3,674,500.00 $3,832,500.00 4.30% Expenditures by Department
Historical Expenditures by Department
Water Connection Water Collection

3.83M
Revenues by Revenue Source
$4M
$3M
$5M
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $2M
$4M
$6M
Water Operating Fund 114
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 13

FY27 Expenditures by Department
Water Collection $4,831,196 100.00%
Category FY 2024 Actual FY 2025 Actual FY 2026 Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Water Connection $648.38 $648.38 - - - -
Water Collection $3,840,868.41 $4,306,598.85 $3,426,812.03 $4,605,835.28 $4,831,196.40 4.89% Total Expenditures $3,841,516.79 $4,307,247.23 $3,426,812.03 $4,605,835.28 $4,831,196.40 4.89%

4.83M
Expenditures by Department
Water Operating Fund 114
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 14

Public Benefit Fund 230
In Riverbank, commercial cannabis businesses—including cultivation, manufacturing, distribution, and retail— are permitted under specific conditions. Prospective operators must obtain a Conditional Use Permit and enter into a Development Agreement with the City. These agreements outline operational standards, community benefit provisions, and financial obligations. The Fund is to account for revenues received from Cannabis Development Agreements.

Public Benefit Fund Comprehensive Fund Summary
Comprehensive Fund Summary
Category
FY 2024
Actual
FY 2025
Actual
FY 2026
Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
Beginning Fund Balance $1,326,554.00 $1,121,052.00 $1,009,806.00 $1,009,806.00 $744,820.00 Revenues
Charges for Services $405,335.34 $445,179.54 $364,332.90 $446,000.00 $469,000.00 Interest Income - $30,423.23 $23,441.71 - $15,000.00
Total Revenues $405,335.34 $475,602.77 $387,774.61 $446,000.00 $484,000.00 Expenditures
Professional Services $190,836.78 $162,489.84 $151,469.63 $206,000.00 $210,000.00 Transfers Out $420,000.00 $424,360.00 - $438,250.00 $450,000.00 Total Expenditures $610,836.78 $586,849.84 $151,469.63 $644,250.00 $660,000.00 Total Revenues Less Expenditures -$205,501.44 -$111,247.07 $236,304.98 -$198,250.00 -$176,000.00 Ending Fund Balance $1,121,052.56 $1,009,804.93 $1,246,110.98 $811,556.00 $568,820.00 Public Benefit Fund 230
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 13

Public Benefit Fund Summary
Revenues vs Expenditures Summary
Revenues by Revenue Source
Historical Revenue by Revenue Source
Interest Income Charges for Services
Revenue Actual Revenue Surplus Revenue Budgeted
Expenditures Actual Expenditures Budgeted
2025 2026 2027
0 $200K
$400K
$600K
$800K
$$447766KK
$$338888KK
$$448844KK
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $200K
$400K
$600K
Public Benefit Fund 230
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 14

FY27 Revenues by Revenue Source
Charges for Services $469,000 96.90%
Interest Income $15,000 3.10%
Category
FY 2024
Actual
FY 2025
Actual
FY 2026
Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Charges for Services $405,335.34 $445,179.54 $364,332.90 $446,000.00 $469,000.00 5.16% Interest Income - $30,423.23 $23,441.71 - $15,000.00 -
Total Revenues $405,335.34 $475,602.77 $387,774.61 $446,000.00 $484,000.00 8.52% Expenditures by Department
Historical Expenditures by Department
Animal Control
484K
Revenues by Revenue Source
$$558877KK
$$115511KK
$$666600KK
FY2025 FY2026 FY2027
0 $250K
$500K
$750K
Public Benefit Fund 230
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 15

FY27 Expenditures by Department
Animal Control $660,000 100.00%
Category
FY 2024
Actual
FY 2025
Actual
FY 2026
Actual
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed
FY 2027
Budgeted
FY 2026 Mid
Year Final
Proposed vs.

FY 2027
Budgeted (%
Change)
Animal Control $610,836.78 $586,849.84 $151,469.63 $644,250.00 $660,000.00 2.44% Total Expenditures $610,836.78 $586,849.84 $151,469.63 $644,250.00 $660,000.00 2.44% 660K
Expenditures by Department
Public Benefit Fund 230
Proposed Budget FY 2026-27 | Riverbank Page 16

Item 10.2. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LRA BOARD
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.2.

SECTION : NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: 6/9/2026
Subject: Resolution to Appoint Kelly Velasco to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee
From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Michael Patton, Director of Parks & Recreation

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City of Riverbank appoint Kelly Velasco to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee.

SUMMARY
On April 28, 2026, the City Council directed staff to begin recruitment efforts to fill a vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. Following public recruitment, application review, and interviews conducted by Parks and Recreation staff, Kelly Velasco received the highest overall score and is being recommended for appointment to a three-year term ending April 30, 2029.

STRATEGIC PLAN
The item directly addresses the city-adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan to “Engage volunteers in the delivery of programs and services to build advocacy and support for the park and recreation systems.” Appointing community members to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee will provide an opportunity for residents to be involved with the municipality and contribute to the formation of parks and recreation in Riverbank.

BACKGROUND
On April 28, 2026, the City Council approved a resolution directing staff to begin recruitment efforts to fill a vacancy on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee. Recruitment for the open position was publicized by the Parks and Recreation Department beginning April 29, 2026, inviting interested community members to apply.

On May 13, 2026, the Parks and Recreation Department conducted an initial review of applications received. A total of six applications were submitted for consideration. Following the review, the Director of Parks and Recreation scheduled interviews with five of the six applicants, as one applicant resided outside the city. Interviews were conducted by the Director of Parks and Recreation and the Parks and Recreation Administrative Clerk. Of the five applicants invited to interview, four participated.

Item 10.2. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
Following the interviews, the Director of Parks and Recreation and the Parks and Recreation Administrative Clerk independently evaluated and scored candidates based on their interview responses. Based on the evaluation process, Kelly Velasco received the highest overall score.

Based on the results of the recruitment and interview process, the Director of Parks and Recreation recommends that the City Council appoint Kelly Velasco to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee for a three-year term beginning June 9, 2026, and ending April 30, 2029.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact on this item.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. PRAC Application- Eric Grubeck

3. PRAC Application- Kelly Velasco

4. PRAC Application- Kimberlly Lainez

5. PRAC Application- Martha Gonzalez

6. PRAC Application- Melissa Medina

7. PRAC Application- Michael Meade

CC/LRA – 06/09/2026
CC Resolution 2026-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK

APPOINTING KELLY VELASCO TO THE PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY

COMMITTEE

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CITY COUNCIL”) DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Riverbank previously established the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee to provide input and recommendations related to parks, recreation programs, facilities, and services; and WHEREAS, a vacancy existed on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee requiring appointment by the City Council; and
WHEREAS, on April 28, 2026, the City Council approved a resolution directing staff to initiate recruitment efforts to fill the vacancy; and WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department publicized the recruitment beginning April 29, 2026, and accepted applications from interested community members; and
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation staff reviewed submitted applications, conducted interviews with eligible candidates, and evaluated applicants based on the established recruitment and interview process; and
WHEREAS, following completion of the recruitment process, staff recommends the appointment of Kelly Velasco to fill the vacant position on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank as follows:

1. The City Council hereby appoints Kelly Velasco to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee.

2. The term of appointment shall begin June 9, 2026, and expire on April 30, 2029.

CC/LRA – 06/09/2026
CC Resolution 2026-

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of June, 2026; motioned by Councilmember __________, seconded by Councilmember __________, and upon roll call was carried by the following City Council vote of ______:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
________________________________ __________________________ Gabriela Hernandez,CMC Rachel Hernandez
City Clerk Mayor

Item 10.3. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LRA BOARD
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.3.

SECTION : NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: 6/9/2026
Subject: Resolution Adopting the “Disruption of Remote Participation During City Council /Board Meetings Policy” as Required by Senate Bill 707 From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Gabriela Hernandez, City Clerk

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended City Council adopt the “Disruption of Remote Participation During City Council/ Board Meetings Policy” (Policy) to incorporate new Brown Act amendments regarding Council meeting disruption procedures for two-way remote access pursuant to Senate Bill 707.

SUMMARY
On October 3, 2025, Governor Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 707 (SB 707), which amends the Brown Act with the intent to diversify and increase public engagement during local government meetings of legislative bodies. Among the various new requirements under SB 707, all qualified legislative bodies must now offer hybrid meetings (through a two-way phone or video platform). The Riverbank City Council and Planning Commission meetings are already, and will continue to be, conducted in a hybrid format via Zoom. Boards and Commissions subject to the Brown Act (such as the Budget Advisory Committee and the Parks & Recreation Advisory Committee) will also be required to comply.

In addition, SB 707 requires the City of Riverbank to formally adopt a policy, on or before July 1, 2026, that outlines the procedures for recessing and reconvening a meeting in the event of disruption and the efforts that the City Council, Planning Commission, all participating boards and staff shall make to attempt to restore the service.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This item is directly related to one of the Strategic Plan goals to "Improve Public Communications" by developing process to address public comments and concerns.

BACKGROUND
Staff prepared the attached Policy to satisfy the new SB 707 requirements. The Policy mirrors the meeting disruption guidelines that are outlined in SB 707, which require the legislative body to take a recess and attempt to restore service for at least one hour. If service cannot be restored within

Item 10.3. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
one hour, the legislative body must conduct a roll-call vote confirming that good-faith efforts were made and that the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the need for remote access.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no financial impact associated with this report.

ATTACHMENTS

1. CC Resolution 2026-XXX_Disruption of Remote Participation Policy

2. Policy_Disruption of Remote Participation

CC/LRA – 06/09/2026
CC Resolution 2026-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK ADOPTING THE "DISRUPTION OF REMOTE PARTICIPATION DURING CITY COUNCIL AND BOARD/COMMITEE MEETINGS POLICY" AS REQUIRED BY SENATE BILL 707

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CITY COUNCIL”) DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, on October 3, 2025, Governor Newsom signed into law Senate Bill 707 (SB 707) ;
WHEREAS, the Riverbank City Council and Planning Commission currently hold their meetings in a hybrid format and will continue to do so; WHEREAS, SB 707 requires the City to formally adopt a policy establishing procedures for disruption of remote participation;
WHEREAS, this policy will apply to City Council, Planning Commission and all legislative Bodies under the Brown Act,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank hereby adopts the attached policy;
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank at a regular meeting held on the 9th day June 2026; motioned by Councilmember ____________, seconded by Councilmember___________, and upon roll call was carried by the following City Council vote of 5/0:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
________________________________ __________________________ Gabriela Hernandez, CMC Rachel Hernandez
City Clerk Mayor
Attachment: Disruption of Remote Participation during meetings policy

City of Riverbank
Disruption of Remote Participation Policy
Disruption of Remote Participation During Council and
Boards/Committee Meetings Policy
The City of Riverbank provides an internet-based two-way audiovisual platform (“Remote Participation Service”) that enables members of the public to remotely attend and participate in meetings of the Riverbank City Council and Boards/Committees. The following procedures shall apply in the event of a disruption to the Remote Participation Service during a meetings:

1. Background
Senate Bill 707 (2025) amended the Brown Act to require eligible legislative bodies to adopt, on or before July 1, 2026, a policy addressing how the agency will respond to disruptions in telephonic or internet service that prevent members of the public from attending or observing a meeting remotely. This policy is adopted to comply with that requirement and to ensure continuity of public participation during technical disruptions.

2. Purpose
This policy establishes procedures for responding to a disruption in the telephonic or internet services that provide two-way remote public access to meetings of the Riverbank City Council, as required by the Brown Act (Gov. Code§ 54953.4). The policy ensures transparency, public participation, and continuity of government during technology disruptions.

3. Definitions
For purposes of this policy:
"Disruption" means any failure, outage, or other interruption that prevents members of the public from attending or observing the meeting via these remote access services. • An interruption affecting only the visual component of the Remote Participation Services shall not constitute a disruption so long as remote participants are still able to listen to and participate in the meeting through the audio component. "Remote access services" means the two-way telephonic service and/or two-way audiovisual platforms used to provide real-time remote public attendance and observation of meetings.

City of Riverbank
Disruption of Remote Participation Policy
Disruption of Remote Participation During Council and
Boards/Committee Meetings Policy

4. Applicability
This policy applies to all open and public meetings of the Riverbank City Council, Boards and Committees at which remote public participation is offered or required under the Brown Act.

5. Procedures in the Event of a Service Disruption

5.1. Response to Service Disruption
If the Presiding Officer or Clerk becomes aware of a disruption to the agency's remote access services that prevents members of the public from attending or observing the meeting remotely:

1. The Presiding Officer or Clerk shall immediately announce the disruption to the public and suspend all agenda discussion and action, and receive an evaluation from staff regarding the disruption and estimated restoration time.

2. The Presiding Officer may then call for a recess of the open session or the Council may, by roll call vote, adjourn to closed session, consistent with the Brown Act.

3. The meeting shall remain in recess for at least one hour or until service is restored, whichever is sooner.

4. If the Council adjourns to closed session, it may continue in closed session until services are restored, closed session business is completed, or one hour has passed since the disruption began, whichever occurs first. If closed session concludes before restoration and less than one hour has elapsed, the Council shall remain in recess until one-hour has passed since the disruption began.

5. During recess and/or closed session, staff shall begin efforts to diagnose and restore the disrupted service.

6. The recess period may be extended if restoration efforts are ongoing.

City of Riverbank
Disruption of Remote Participation Policy
Disruption of Remote Participation During Council and
Boards/Committee Meetings Policy

5.2. Efforts to Restore Service
The city shall make good faith efforts to restore remote access services, which may include:
∙ Troubleshooting platform or teleconferencing software ∙ Resetting or replacing audiovisual equipment
∙ Attempting alternative connection methods.
∙ Contacting necessary support staff or service providers ∙ Switching to back up equipment or platforms, if available.

Information Technology staff shall report to the City Clerk the restoration efforts undertaken.

6. Reconvening the Open Session

6.1 Timing
The open session may be reconvened after at least one hour has elapsed from the time of disruption or as soon as service is restored, whichever occurs earlier.

6.2 If Service is Restored
If the remote access service is restored before or at the time the meeting reconvenes, the meeting shall continue as normal.

6.3 If Service is NOT Restored

1. Adjourn the meeting; or

2. Continue the meeting in open session by adopting, by roll call vote, the following, or a substantially similar finding;
“The City of Riverbank has made good faith efforts to restore telephonic and/or internet service in accordance with its adopted policy, and the public interest in continuing the meeting outweighs the public interest in remote public access” Upon adoption of the finding, the legislative body may continue the open session despite the fact that remote access services have not been restored.

City of Riverbank
Disruption of Remote Participation Policy
Disruption of Remote Participation During Council and
Boards/Committee Meetings Policy

7. Recordkeeping
The Clerk shall enter a brief statement into the meeting minutes, including the following:
• The nature and time of disruption
• The restoration efforts undertaken
• The time the meeting was reconvened (if applicable)
• Any finding adopted pursuant to Section 6.3 (of this policy)

8. Review and Updates
This policy may be amended by the Riverbank City Council at a noticed public meeting in open session, not in consent calendar.

Item 10.4. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LRA BOARD
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.4.

SECTION : NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: 6/9/2026
Subject:

Resolution to Consider Approving Park System Development Fee (SDF) Credits for LGI Homes for Construction of a Dog Park on Lot A within the River’s Edge 36-Lot Residential Subdivision.

From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Joshua Mann, Director of Community Development

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving Park System Development Fee credits for LGI Homes for the construction of a new dog park on Lot A within its 36-lot residential subdivision, subject to completion, inspection and acceptance of the park improvements by the City.

SUMMARY
LGI Homes is in the beginning stages of constructing a new 36-lot residential subdivision in the City of Riverbank. As part of the project, LGI Homes will construct a new dog park on Lot A, which consists of approximately 21,471 square feet.

The City’s current Park System Development Fee (for Low Density Residential) is $5,617 per residential lot. LGI Homes has requested a Park System Development Fee credit equal to $5,617 for each of the 36 residential lots, for a total requested credit of $202,212.

LGI Homes has provided cost information showing that the estimated cost to construct the dog park is $480,529. This amount exceeds the total requested Park System Development Fee credit. No additional reimbursement, cash payment, assignment of credits or credit above the Park System Development Fee obligation is proposed.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve and memorialize Park System Development Fee credits in the total amount of $202,212 for the LGI Homes subdivision. The credits would be limited to the 36 residential lots within the subdivision and would be applied on a per-lot basis as each building permit is issued. Each lot would receive a Park System Development Fee credit in the amount of $5,617, which is equal to the City’s current Park System Development Fee for one residential lot. The credits would not be paid as a cash reimbursement and would not exceed the Park System Development Fee due for each lot.

The City Council action would authorize staff to administer the credits at building permit issuance. As part of the credit approval, LGI Homes remains responsible for completing the dog park improvements on Lot A. Once construction is complete, the dog park improvements

Item 10.4. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

STRATEGIC PLAN
This item supports the City’s Strategic Plan by expanding public recreation amenities, improving neighborhood quality of life and supporting well-planned residential growth. The proposed dog park will provide a new public amenity within a residential subdivision and will respond to community interest in additional park facilities.

BACKGROUND
LGI Homes is developing a new 36-lot residential subdivision in the City of Riverbank. The subdivision includes Lot A, which contains approximately 21,471 square feet.

Lot A was originally intended to serve as a potential expansion area for the adjacent Diamond Bar East/Bruin Park drainage basin. After review of the basin’s performance, the City Engineer determined that the additional expansion area was not needed. The existing basin has proven to function well and provides adequate drainage capacity without the need to use Lot A for future basin expansion.

Following that determination, LGI Homes offered to construct a dog park on Lot A. A dog park has been identified as one of the top requested park amenities from local residents through a Parks Department survey. The proposed dog park will create a new public recreation amenity while making productive use of property that is no longer needed for drainage basin expansion.

The dog park is proposed to include separate areas for small dogs and large dogs. Planned amenities include an obstacle course, watering station, drinking fountain, waste station, gated secured entrance and seating. The improvements are intended to provide a safe, accessible and attractive public amenity for residents and dog owners.

The City currently collects System Development Fees at building permit issuance to defray the impact of new development as authorized by Government Code sections 66000 through 66025. The City’s System Development Fee program is codified in Riverbank Municipal Code section 150.30, titled “System Development Fees,” which establishes the authority for imposing and charging these fees.

System Development Fees are collected to:

1. Provide an adequate and constant method for financing the unfunded portion of needed system development costs throughout the City that are reasonably related to projected community growth.

2. Promote the orderly and efficient expansion of public improvements to adequately meet the domestic and economic needs of the community and minimize adverse fiscal and environmental impacts of new development.

3. Ensure the continuation of necessary services, including police and general administrative services.

4. Establish equitable methods for minimizing public facility and service costs to the City associated with new development.

As defined within Riverbank’s Municipal Code, System Development Fees are charged to new construction to mitigate the unfunded portion of the determined impact of the development.

For this subdivision, the applicable Park System Development Fee is $5,617 per residential lot. For

Item 10.4. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
36 residential lots, the total Park System Development Fee obligation is $202,212.

LGI Homes has requested a credit against the Park System Development Fee because it will construct the dog park improvements at its own cost. The submitted estimated cost for the dog park improvements is $480,529, which exceeds the requested credit amount. The requested credit is limited to the Park System Development Fee obligation for the 36 residential lots and does not include any additional reimbursement, cash payment or credit

ANALYSIS
The proposed dog park provides a direct park and recreation benefit to the City and its residents. The improvement will convert Lot A from a no-longer-needed drainage expansion area into a public recreation amenity that responds to community demand for dog park facilities.

The requested Park System Development Fee credit is proportional and limited. The City’s current Park System Development Fee is $5,617 per residential lot. For 36 lots, the total Park System Development Fee obligation is $202,212. LGI Homes has provided dog park construction cost information totaling $480,529, which exceeds the full amount of the requested Park System Development Fee credit.

The proposed credit does not result in a cash reimbursement. It also does not authorize any credit above the Park System Development Fee obligation for the 36 residential lots. The credit would only offset Park System Development Fees that would otherwise be collected from the LGI Homes subdivision at building permit issuance.

The proposed City Council action would memorialize the total approved Park System Development Fee credit amount and authorize staff to apply the credits on a per-lot basis as building permits are issued. Each of the 36 residential lots would be eligible for one Park System Development Fee credit in the amount of $5,617. The credits would be applied only to the Park System Development Fee and would not apply to other System Development Fees, permit fees, plan check fees, inspection fees or fees imposed by other agencies.

LGI Homes remains responsible for completing the dog park improvements on Lot A. After construction is complete, the dog park improvements must be inspected by the City and accepted in accordance with City requirements. The approval of credits does not waive the requirement to complete the dog park improvements and does not waive any applicable inspection, acceptance, warranty, bonding or improvement requirements.

The proposed credit is not an assignment of credits to another developer or project. The credit is limited to the 36 residential lots within the LGI Homes subdivision. Any unused credit, if any, would not be paid as cash and would not be transferred unless separately approved by the City Council.

Staff finds that the proposed Park System Development Fee credit is appropriate because:

1. LGI Homes will construct a public park amenity that benefits the City and its residents.

2. The dog park responds to community interest identified through a Parks Department survey.

3. Lot A is no longer needed for drainage basin expansion, based on the City Engineer’s determination.

4. The estimated dog park construction cost of $480,529 exceeds the total requested Park System Development Fee credit of $202,212.

Item 10.4. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

5. The credit is limited to the Park System Development Fee obligation for the 36 residential lots.

6. The credit will be applied on a per-lot basis as each building permit is issued.

7. No additional reimbursement, cash payment or credit above the Park System Development Fee obligation is proposed.

8. LGI Homes remains responsible for completing the dog park improvements, which must be inspected and accepted by the City.

Based on this analysis, staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the requested Park System Development Fee credits.

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The current Park System Development Fee is $5,617 per residential lot. The LGI Homes subdivision includes 36 residential lots. The total Park System Development Fee obligation is $202,212.

LGI Homes has provided cost information showing that the estimated cost to construct the dog park is $480,529. The proposed Park System Development Fee credit is capped at $202,212 and is limited to the Park System Development Fee obligation for the 36 residential lots.

An SDF fee table (shown below) is included with this report to show the estimated System Development Fee totals for the project. The table identifies the applicable per-unit fees and the estimated total fees for all 36 residential lots. The Parks & Recreation line item is shown as $0.00 in the table because the scenario assumes City Council approval of the requested Park System Development Fee credit in the amount of $5,617 per lot, for a total credit of $202,212.

With approval of the credit, the estimated total System Development Fees for the project would be $32,553 per unit and $1,171,908 for the 36-lot subdivision. Without the Park System Development Fee credit, the project would be subject to an additional $5,617 per lot, or $202,212 total, for Parks & Recreation System Development Fees.

The credits would be applied on a per-lot basis as each building permit is issued. Each residential lot would receive a Park System Development Fee credit in the amount of $5,617. No cash reimbursement is proposed. No credit above the Park System Development Fee obligation is proposed. Any unused credit would not be paid to LGI Homes unless separately approved by the City Council.

Item 10.4. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
The financial impact to the Park System Development Fee fund is the application of $202,212 in Park System Development Fee credits in exchange for construction of a public dog park with an estimated construction cost of $480,529.

ATTACHMENTS

1. LGI SDF Request Letter

2. Dog Park Cost Estimate

3. Approved Dog Park Plans

4. Resolution 2026-

CENTRAL STREET

B STREET SANTA FE STREET SIERRA STREET
PLOTTED: 9/29/2025 10:28 AM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L0.1 RIVERS EDGE - COVER.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8 L I C ENS ED L ANDS CA P E A RC H I T E C T S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS GENERAL NOTES: PLANS CREATED REFERENCING 2022 CBC, 2022 CEC, 2022 CMC, 2022 CPC, 2022 CALIFORNIA GREEN STANDARDS CODE, RIVERBANK MUNICIPAL CODE SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR AND SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE FOLLOWED PER THE REPORT. PHYSICAL COPIES OF THE SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO CLIENT, PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND LOCAL AGENCY AS REQUIRED. SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT SHALL CONFORM TO STATE AB1881 WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE (WELO) OR AGENCY ADOPTED WELO AS FOLLOWS: (1) SUBMIT SOIL SAMPLES TO A LABORATORY FOR ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. (A) SOIL SAMPLING SHALL BE CONDUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LABORATORY PROTOCOL, INCLUDING PROTOCOLS REGARDING ADEQUATE SAMPLING DEPTH FOR THE INTENDED PLANTS. (B) THE SOIL ANALYSIS MAY INCLUDE: SOIL TEXTURE, INFILTRATION RATE DETERMINED BY LABORATORY TEST OR SOIL TEXTURE INFILTRATION RATE TABLE, PH, TOTAL SOLUBLE SALTS, SODIUM, PERCENT ORGANIC MATTER, AND RECOMMENDATIONS. (2) THE PROJECT APPLICANT, OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE, SHALL COMPLY WITH ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: (A) IF SIGNIFICANT MASS GRADING IS NOT PLANNED, THE SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LOCAL AGENCY AS PART OF THE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE; OR (B) IF SIGNIFICANT MASS GRADING IS PLANNED, THE SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE LOCAL AGENCY AS PART OF THE CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION (3) THE SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT SHALL BE MADE AVAILABLE, IN A TIMELY MANNER, TO THE PROFESSIONALS PREPARING THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN PLANS AND IRRIGATION DESIGN PLANS TO MAKE ANY NECESSARY ADJUSTMENT TO THE DESIGN PLANS. (4) THE PROJECT APPLICANT, OR HIS/HER DESIGNEE, SHALL SUBMIT DOCUMENTATION VERIFYING IMPLEMENTATION OF SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE LOCAL AGENCY WITH CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING THAT THE WORK IS COMPLETE AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE MOST CURRENT CODES, ORDINANCES AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE GOVERNING AGENCY. SITE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR CHANGES WHICH OCCUR TO THE CODES, ORDINANCES OR REQUIREMENTS AFTER THE GOVERNING AGENCY'S APPROVAL OR DURING INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES OR PROCEDURES, OR FOR SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS IN CONNECTION WITH THE WORK. SITE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTRACTOR'S FAILURE TO CARRY OUT THE WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT DOCUMENTS, NOR RESPONSIBLE FOR ACTS OR OMISSIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR, SUBCONTRACTORS, OR THEIR AGENTS OR EMPLOYEES, OR OF ANY OTHER PERSONS PERFORMING PORTIONS OF THE WORK. AS REQUESTED BY THE OWNER, SITE WILL VISIT THE SITE AT INTERVALS APPROPRIATE TO THE STAGE OF CONSTRUCTION TO REVIEW THE PROGRESS AND QUALITY OF WORK AND TO DETERMINE IN GENERAL IF THE WORK IS BEING PERFORMED IN A MANNER INDICATING THAT THE WORK, WHEN COMPLETED, WILL BE SUBSTANTIAL CONFORMANCE WITH THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. HOWEVER, SITE WILL NOT MAKE EXHAUSTIVE OR CONTINUOUS ON-SITE INSPECTION TO CHECK QUALITY OF THE WORK. THERE IS NO WARRANTY OR GUARANTEE EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SITE FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE WORK OR THE QUALITY OF PERFORMANCE OF THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR(S). CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPERVISE AND DIRECT THE WORK, USING THE CONTRACTOR'S BEST SKILL AND ATTENTION. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR AND HAVE CONTROL OVER CONSTRUCTION MEANS, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, SEQUENCES, AND PROCEDURES AND FOR COORDINATING ALL PORTIONS OF THE WORK. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO THE OWNER FOR ACTS AND OMISSIONS OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES, SUBCONTRACTORS AND THEIR AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES, AND OTHER PERSONS PERFORMING PORTIONS OF THE WORK UNDER A CONTRACT WITH CONTRACTOR. IN THE EVENT OWNER CONSENTS TO, ALLOWS, AUTHORIZES OR APPROVES OF CHANGES TO ANY PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, OR OTHER CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS, AND THESE ALTERATIONS ARE NOT APPROVED IN WRITING BY SITE, OWNER RECOGNIZES THAT SUCH ALTERATION AND THE RESULTS THEREOF ARE NOT THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SITE. IN ADDITION, OWNER AGREES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD SITE HARMLESS FROM ANY DAMAGE, LIABILITY OR COST (INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS OF DEFENSE) ARISING FROM SUCH ALTERATIONS. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS WERE OBTAINED FROM AVAILABLE RECORDS AT THE TIME THE PLANS WERE DRAFTED AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE A REPRESENTATION AS TO THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THE LOCATION OR THE EXISTENCE OR NON-EXISTENCE OF SUCH UTILITIES. IN NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT UNDERGROUND SERVICES ALERT AT 1-800-642-2444 PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY CONSTRUCTION WORK. IN OTHER AREAS, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT A SIMILAR AGENCY/ORGANIZATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PROPER PROJECT MAINTENANCE AFTER THE PROJECT IS COMPLETE, AS NEGOTIATED BETWEEN CONTRACTOR AND OWNER. ANY LACK OF OR IMPROPER MAINTENANCE MAY RESULT IN DAMAGE TO PROPERTY OR PERSONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE RESULTS OF ANY LACK OF OR IMPROPER MAINTENANCE. LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT PLANS RIVER'S EDGE RIVERBANK, CALIFORNIA VICINITY MAP COVER SHEET DRAWING INDEX L0.1 COVER SHEET L1.1 CONSTRUCTION PLAN L1.2 DOG AGILITY EQUIPMENT PLAN L2.1-L2.3 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS L2.4-L2.5 DOG AGILITY EQUIPMENT DETAILS L3.1 IRRIGATION PLAN L3.2 IRRIGATION LEGEND & NOTES L3.3-3.4 IRRIGATION DETAILS L3.5 MWELO WATER USE CALCULATIONS L4.1 PLANTING PLAN L4.2 PLANTING LEGEND & NOTES L4.3 PLANTING DETAILS CLIENT/PROPERTY OWNER LGI HOMES 2251 DOUGLAS BLVD., SUITE 100 ROSEVILLE, CA 95661 GOVERNING AGENCY CITY OF RIVERBANK 6707 3RD STREET RIVERBANK, CA 95367 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT siTe LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 4216 KIERNAN AVE. SUITE 201 MODESTO, CA 95356 CIVIL ENGINEER BENCHMARK ENGINEERING 4265 SPYRES WAY, SUITE A MODESTO, CA 95356 SITE MAP SITE PROPOSED DOG PARK PROPOSED STREETSCAPE

SIERRA STREET
AeccDbAlignment (AeccLand130) B STREET
7 6
5 4
8 3
2 1
10'-4" 20'-8" 4'-0" 4'-0"
2'-0"
4'-0"
11"
12'-0" 16'-0" 8'-0"
4'-0"
11" 5'-0" MIN. LANDING
2'-0"
PLOTTED: 9/30/2025 4:00 PM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L1.1 RIVERS EDGE - CONST.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8

L I C ENS ED
L AN
DS CA
P
E

A RC H I T E C T

S T A T E
O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS CONSTRUCTION PLAN SCALE:
1 4" = 1'-0"
0 20' 40' EXISTING CONCRETE SIDEWALK TO REMAIN AND TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE NATURAL GRAY CONCRETE PAVING WITH A MEDIUM BROOM FINISH. PROVIDE TOOLED SCORE JOINTS AS SHOWN ON PLANS. LONGITUDINAL SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 1:20 (5%); CROSS-SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 1:48 (2%). 5' HIGH BLACK VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK DOG PARK FENCE NO DETAIL 6' HIGH WOOD FENCING PER PRODUCTION PLANS 8" WIDE NATURAL GRAY CONCRETE MOWSTRIP WITH A MEDIUM BROOM FINISH. PROVIDE TOOLED SCORE JOINTS AT 8' O.C. 'PET PLATINUM' SYNTHETIC TURF BY SYNLAWN. SYNTHETIC TURF TO BE EDGED WITH 316"x4" BLACK 'DURA-EDGE' STEEL EDGING BY JD RUSSELL CO. 3" THICK LAYER OF TAN STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE. STABILIZER PRODUCT TO BE 'STABILIZER' BY STABILIZER SOLUTIONS OR APPROVED EQUAL. D.G. TO BE EDGED WITH 316"x4" BLACK POWDER COATED 'DURA-EDGE' STEEL EDGING BY JD RUSSELL CO. AROUND ENTIRE PERIMETER, INCLUDING ALONG FENCE LINES. LAWN AREA - SEE PLANTING PLANS SHRUB/GROUNDCOVER AREA - SEE PLANTING PLANS CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE SEATING POD 48"Wx5'H VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK GATE PET DRINKING FOUNTAIN, MODEL 300SM BY MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAINS, INC. COLOR TO BE GREEN. SEE IRRIGATION PLAN FOR WATER SERVICE. PRECAST CONCRETE FLUSH MOUNT 'DOG BONE' BENCH BY UPC PARKS. BENCH AVAILABLE FROM PARK PLANET (877.473.7619). EXISTING LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION TO REMAIN AND TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE EXISTING EXERCISE STATION TO REMAIN AND TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE EXISTING BENCH TO REMAIN AND TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE CONCRETE STREET SIDEWALK PER CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS EXISTING CMU BLOCK RETAINING WALL WITH WOOD FENCE TO REMAIN AND TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE PRECAST CONCRETE STANDARD ROUND TRASH RECEPTACLE, MODEL 3426, BY UPC PARKS. TRASH RECEPTACLE
AVAILABLE FROM PARK PLANET (877.473.7619). COLOR TO BE 'SANDSTONE'. 6' HIGH BLACK VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK FENCE ALONG NORTH AND WEST PROPERTY LINES WITH HDPE TUBULAR PRIVACY SLATS 12' DUAL SWING BLACK VINYL-COATED CHAIN LINK MAINTENANCE GATE 12 A-B L2.13
CL2.1
45 EL2.26
BL2.2
7 CL2.2
8910 D-F L2.1 11
AL2.2 12DL2.2 13GL2.1 141516171819 FL2.2 20AL2.3 21BL2.3 NO. DETAIL DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION LEGEND NOTES: 1. SEE SHEET L1.2 FOR DOG AGILITY EQUIPMENT PLAN. 2. SEE SHEET L2.1-L2.3 FOR CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. 3. SEE SHEET L2.3 FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTES. SYM. QUAN. 2 1
1 1
3 3
3 4
4 4
5 3
6 6 10 11 11
8 2
8 8
7 7
7 7
7 12 13
6 14 14 15 15 16 EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN 14
4 181818 171717
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9
9 9 20 20 20 6'H CHAIN LINK FENCE TO BE PLACED 8" OFF OF WEST PROPERTY LINE TO ACCOMMODATE FOR WOOD PRODUCTION FENCING 20 4 19
3 20 DOG PARK VESTIBULE ENLARGEMENT 13 19 12 11 11 11 11 3 3
3 3
3 3 6'H CHAIN LINK FENCE TO BE PLACED 8" OFF OF SOUTH PROPERTY LINE TO ACCOMMODATE FOR FUTURE WOOD FENCING 2 21 21 REMOVE EXISTING PLANTING IN THIS AREA TO ACCOMMODATE FOR NEW SIDEWALK AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS REMOVE EXISTING PLANTING IN THIS AREA TO ACCOMMODATE FOR NEW MAINTENANCE ACCESS PAD

PLOTTED: 9/30/2025 4:01 PM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L1.2 RIVERS EDGE - CONST.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8

L I C ENS ED
L AN
DS CA
P
E

A RC H I T E C T

S T A T E
O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS 0 10' 20' DOG AGILITY EQUIPMENT PLAN
A RECYCLED CRAWL TUNNEL W/ DOG HOUSE RP DOGGIE FENCE RUN MINI PUP CLUBHOUSE SIT & STAY BENCH RECYCLED CURVED TUNNEL W/ DOG HOUSE RECYCLED RING DOG JUMP HILLTOP CHALLENGE WEAVE POST STEPPING PAWS WASTE STATION (2 EA.) FIRE HYDRANT (2 EA.)
A
AL2.4
B
BL2.4
C
CL2.4
D
DL2.4
E EL2.4F FL2.4G
GL2.4
H HL2.4I IL2.4J JL2.5K
KL2.5 DETAIL DESCRIPTION DOG AGILITY EQUIPMENT LEGEND ALL DOG AGILITY EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE FROM NORTHERN CALIFORNIA RECREATION. CONTACT JOHN OGDEN FOR PRICING AND ORDERING INFORMATION ([email protected] / 415.937.1697). CALLOUT B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
J
K

K LARGE DOG AREA SMALL DOG AREA

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PLOTTED: 9/29/2025 10:37 AM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L2.1 RIVERS EDGE - DETAILS.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8 L I C ENS ED L ANDS CA P E A RC H I T E C T S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS AB DEC F 5' TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE SCALE 1/2"=1'-0" 1 2-3/8" SCHEDULE 40 BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TERMINAL/CORNER POST 1-5/8" SCHEDULE 40 BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL LINE POST SPACED EQUALLY AT 10' O.C. MAX. SPACING. 2 MIN. 3/4" WIDE BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TENSION BAND @ 12" O.C. 3 3/16" X 3/4" BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TENSION BAR 1-5/8" SCHEDULE 40 BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TOP RAIL 4 9-GAUGE BLACK ALUMINUM TIE WIRES @ 24" O.C. ON RAILS 2" MESH, 9-GAUGE BLACK VINYL-CLAD GALVANIZED STEEL FENCE FABRIC WITH KNUCKLED SELVAGE 9-GAUGE BLACK VINYL-COATED STEEL TENSION WIRE 9-GAUGE BLACK ALUMINUM TIE WIRES @ 12" O.C. ON POSTS BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL LOOP CAP WELDED TO POST BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL RAIL END KNUCKLED SELVAGE AT TOP FINISH GRADE COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE FOOTING AT POST (TYP.) EQUAL POST SPACING - 10'-0" O.C. MAX. (NTS) NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT OF ANY MATERIALS. 2. ALL COMPONENTS AND HARDWARE TO BE BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4X POST DIAMETER 4X POST DIAMETER 30" 6" 6" 30" BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL DOME CAP WELDED TO POST 5'-0" 1234567 8910111213141516 715 14 9 13 8 7 10 6 12 5 11 15 16 PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVING SCALE 1"=1'-0" NOTES: 1. SEE FINISH SCHEDULE FOR COLORS AND FINISHES. 4" THICK 2500PSI CONCRETE AGGREGATE BASE PER CIVIL AND/OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER SUBGRADE PREPARATION PER CIVIL AND/OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER REINFORCEMENT PER CIVIL AND/OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER 1/2" RADIUS ADJACENT PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE 2" BELOW FINISH GRADE OF CONCRETE 123456 6 5 3 2 1 4 3" PAVING JOINTS SCALE 1"=1'-0" NOTES: 1. SEE CALLOUT/MATERIALS LIST FOR COLORS AND FINISHES. 2. CONTROL JOINT SPACING AS SHOWN IN PLAN. CONTROL JOINTS IN CONCRETE WITH AGGREGATE LESS THAN 3/4" SIZE SHALL HAVE MAX SPACING OF 2X (IN FEET) THE THICKNESS OF THE SLAB (IN INCHES). IN CONCRETE WITH AGGREGATE LARGER THAN 3/4", MAX SPACING SHALL BE 3X (IN FEET) THE THICKNESS OF THE SLAB (IN INCHES). EXPANSION JOINT - 1/4"X3" POLYFELT, TOP WITH 2 PART SELF-LEVELING SEALER, COLOR TO MATCH ADJACENT PAVING. PROVIDE 1/2" RADIUS EDGE. COLD JOINT - BETWEEN SLABS - #4 18" SMOOTH DOWEL SPACED AT 36" O.C., SLEEVE OR GREASE ONE END. CONTROL JOINT - SAW CUT (1/8" W X 1/4 SLAB DEPTH) OR TOOLED JOINT (1/4" W X 1/4 SLAB DEPTH WITH 1/4" RADIUS). CONCRETE PAVING AND REINFORCEMENT PER CONCRETE PAVING DETAIL, THIS SHEET. 1234 1 4 3 2 3" CLR. TYP SEATING POD - PLAN SCALE 1/2"=1'-0" 1 2134" 3634" 26" 34" 34" 37" 26" 1834" 24" TYP. +18" +16" +14" +14" +12" POURED-IN-PLACE NATURAL GRAY CONCRETE WITH A SMOOTH TROWELED FINISH 1 SEATING POD - PERSPECTIVE NOT TO SCALE POURED-IN-PLACE NATURAL GRAY CONCRETE WITH A SMOOTH TROWELED FINISH 1 +18" 1 +12" +14" +14" +16" SEATING POD - ELEVATION SCALE 1/2"=1'-0" POURED-IN-PLACE NATURAL GRAY CONCRETE. ALL EXPOSED SURFACES SHALL HAVE A SMOOTH TROWELED FINISH. FINISH GRADE COMPACTED SUBGRADE 4" THICK LAYER OF CLASS II BASE ROCK, COMPACTED TO 95% #4 VERTICAL REBAR @ 10.5" O.C. #4 HORIZONTAL REBAR, 4 PER POD, SPACED EVENLY 1 48" 48" 48" 10" 2 1 2 3 3 4 16" 14" 18" 14" 12" 3" CLR. 2 TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT - ELEVATION 3" CLR. 3" CLR. 1012" O.C., TYP. 5 5 5 TYPICAL REINFORCEMENT - PLAN 6 6 6 4 10" 1DOG BONE BENCH G NOT TO SCALE

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PLOTTED: 9/29/2025 10:38 AM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L2.2 RIVERS EDGE - DETAILS.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8

L I C ENS ED
L AN
DS CA
P
E

A RC H I T E C T

S T A T E
O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS B
A
D CHAIN LINK GATE SCALE 1/2"=1'-0" 2-3/8" SCHEDULE 40 BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TERMINAL/CORNER POST MIN. 3/4" WIDE BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TENSION BAND @ 12" O.C. 3/16" X 3/4" BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TENSION BAR 1-5/8" SCHEDULE 40 BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL GATE FRAME 9-GAUGE BLACK ALUMINUM TIE WIRES @ 24" O.C. ON RAILS 2" MESH, 9-GAUGE BLACK VINYL-CLAD GALVANIZED STEEL FENCE FABRIC WITH KNUCKLED SELVAGE KNUCKLED SELVAGE AT TOP AND BOTTOM FINISH GRADE COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE FOOTING AT POST (TYP.) NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT OF ANY MATERIALS. 2. ALL COMPONENTS AND HARDWARE TO BE BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. GATE HEIGHT TO MATCH ADJACENT FENCE HEIGHT. BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL DOME CAP WELDED TO POST 1 2
3 45
67 891011 48" 3" 4X POST DIAMETER 30" 6" 15 14
1 2
6 4
3 5
8 7
9 ADJACENT FENCE - SEE SEPARATE DETAIL 12 12 12 BLACK STEEL BULLDOG HINGE (TYP. OF 2 PER GATE LEAF) 13 1313 14 BLACK STEEL FORK LATCH 14 39" SYNTHETIC TURF WITH STEEL HEADER NOT TO SCALE ADJACENT CONCRETE PAVING OR MOWSTRIP PER PLAN 3" THICK LAYER OF AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED TO 90% RELATIVE DENSITY SYNTHETIC TURF - SEE PLAN FOR MANUFACTURER AND MODEL COMPACTED SUBGRADE ENVIROFILL TURF INFILL INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS DURA-EDGE 316"X4" BLACK STEEL EDGING BY JD RUSSELL CO. ADJACENT PLANTER 1 23
2 3 1 1"
4 4
5 5
6 67
7 STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PAVING. NOTES: 1. STABILIZED DG SHALL BE COMPACTED PER THE STABILIZER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS WITH A 2 TO 5 TON DOUBLE DRUM ROLLER WITH THE VIBRATORY SETTING "OFF". COMPACTION WITH A VIBRA-PLATE OR OTHER MEANS IS NOT ACCEPTABLE UNLESS APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. NATIVE SUBGRADE COMPACTED TO 90% COMPACTED CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE HEADER - INSTALL FLUSH WITH SURFACE OF DG. SEE PLAN FOR HEADER INFORMATION 1" ADJACENT MULCH WHERE OCCURS - SEE PLAN STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE SCALE 1"=1'-0" 1 2
3 45
5 4 1 2
3 ADJACENT PAVING WHERE OCCURS - SEE PLAN
6 6 3"4"
C DOG DRINKING FOUNTAIN SCALE 1-1/2"=1'-0"
1 FOUNTAIN PER PLAN SCHEDULE 40 PVC WATER LINE FROM IRRIGATION SYSTEM PVC DRAIN LINE ROUND CONCRETE TRAFFIC VALVE BOX WITH LOCKING CAST IRON LID ROUND CONCRETE VALVE BOX WITH CAST IRON GRATE FORD B11-NL BALL VALVE OR APPROVED EQUAL FINISH SURFACE PER PLAN PLANTER AREA ANCHORS PER FOUNTAIN MANUFACTURER 10" STAINLESS STEEL SURFACE CARRIERS 1" TO 1-1/2" DIA. DRAIN ROCK, FREE FROM FINES 1 36"
2345
6 2
3 4
7 7
512"
6 8
8 9
910 10 11 11 CONCRETE MOW STRIP SCALE 1"=1'-0"
1 CONCRETE MOW STRIP WITH #4 HORIZONTAL REBAR,
CONTINUOUS, AND CONTROL JOINTS @ 8'O.C. MAX 4" LAYER CLASS II AB COMPACTED TO 90% NATIVE GRADE ADJACENT TURF OR OTHER SURFACE PER PLAN ADJACENT PLANTING AREA PER PLAN 23 4
5 6 1/2" RADIUS, TYPICAL
1 SEE PLAN 4"
2 3
5 6
4 2"

E TRASH RECEPTACLE

F NOT TO SCALE

CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
PLOTTED: 9/29/2025 10:38 AM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L2.3 RIVERS EDGE - DETAILS.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8 L I C ENS ED L ANDS CA P E A RC H I T E C T S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS A 6' TALL CHAIN LINK FENCE WITH PRIVACY SLATS SCALE 1/2"=1'-0" 1 2-3/8" SCHEDULE 40 BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TERMINAL/CORNER POST 1-5/8" SCHEDULE 40 BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL LINE POST SPACED EQUALLY AT 10' O.C. MAX. SPACING. 2 MIN. 3/4" WIDE BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TENSION BAND @ 12" O.C. 3 3/16" X 3/4" BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TENSION BAR 1-5/8" SCHEDULE 40 BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TOP RAIL 4 9-GAUGE BLACK ALUMINUM TIE WIRES @ 24" O.C. ON RAILS 2" MESH, 9-GAUGE BLACK VINYL-CLAD GALVANIZED STEEL FENCE FABRIC WITH KNUCKLED SELVAGE 9-GAUGE BLACK VINYL-COATED STEEL TENSION WIRE 9-GAUGE BLACK ALUMINUM TIE WIRES @ 12" O.C. ON POSTS BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL LOOP CAP WELDED TO POST BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL RAIL END KNUCKLED SELVAGE AT TOP FINISH GRADE COMPACTED SUBGRADE CONCRETE FOOTING AT POST (TYP.) EQUAL POST SPACING - 10'-0" O.C. MAX. (NTS) NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT OF ANY MATERIALS. 2. ALL COMPONENTS AND HARDWARE TO BE BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4X POST DIAMETER 4X POST DIAMETER 30" 6" 6" 30" BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL DOME CAP WELDED TO POST 6'-0" (NTS) 1234567 8910111213141516 715 14 9 13 8 7 10 6 12 5 11 15 16 PRIVACY SLATS COMMERCIAL-GRADE HDPE TUBE SLATS WITH UV INHIBITOR 17 177 MAINTENANCE ACCESS GATE SCALE 1/2"=1'-0" MATCH ADJACENT FENCE HEIGHT 42" (NTS) 2" 4X POST DIAMETER 12'-0" 134 13 2 7 9 12 512 2-7/8"Ø SCHEDULE 40 BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL HINGE POST (TYP. OF 2) 2-3/8"Ø SCHEDULE 40 BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL FRAME MIN. 3/4" WIDE BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TENSION BAND @ 12" O.C. 3/16" X 3/4" BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL TENSION BAR 2" MESH, 9-GAUGE BLACK VINYL-CLAD GALVANIZED STEEL FENCE FABRIC WITH KNUCKLED SELVAGE KNUCKLED SELVAGE AT TOP MAINTENANCE ACCESS PAD PER PLAN HEAVY-DUTY GALVANIZED STEEL HINGE (TYP. OF 2 PER GATE LEAF) CONCRETE FOOTING AT POST (TYP.) NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT OF ANY MATERIALS. 2. ALL COMPONENTS AND HARDWARE TO BE BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BLACK POWDER COATED STEEL DOME CAP WELDED TO POST 12345678910111213 11 14 6 10 2 GALVANIZED STEEL FORK LATCH ADJACENT CHAIN LINK FENCE - SEE SEPARATE DETAIL 9-GAUGE ALUMINUM TIE WIRES @ 16" O.C. ANTI-SAG KIT WITH 3/32" DIA. STAINLESS TENSION CABLE AND 1/4" (M6) STAINLESS STEEL TURNBUCKLE 14 2 8 138"Ø GALVANIZED STEEL DROP ROD W/ 1-5/8" GUIDES 15 15 16 DROP ROD SLEEVE IN CONCRETE FOOTING 8" 6" 16 6" 3 17 4" CRUSHED DRAIN ROCK 17 18 FINISH GRADE 18 19 COMPACTED SUBGRADE 19 B GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF ALL IMPROVEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND AS DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID AND PRIOR TO COMMENCING INSTALLATION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST, THEY SHOULD BE BROUGHT TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE CITY AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND STAKING ALL SEWER, WATER AND UTILITY LINES ABOVE OR BELOW GRADE THAT MIGHT BE DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY COST INCURRED FOR REPAIR, RESTORATION, OR REPLACEMENT OF AFOREMENTIONED UTILITIES DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. 4. HARDSCAPE AND STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS SHALL BE PLACED PER THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 5. UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THE DRAWINGS OTHERWISE, ALL MATERIALS DESIGNATED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF-SITE. 6. UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THE DRAWINGS OTHERWISE, MATERIALS TO BE PURCHASED AND FURNISHED BY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE NEW. 7. CONCRETE INDICATED FOR SAWCUTTING AND REMOVAL SHALL BE CUT TO A TRUE LINE WITH NEATLY SAWED EDGES. IF A SAWCUT IS WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF AN EXISTING EXPANSION OR CONTROL JOINT, CONCRETE SHALL BE REMOVED TO THAT NEAREST JOINT. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS, MANUFACTURER'S CUT OR DATA SHEETS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO ORDERING MATERIALS. 9. COSTS INCURRED DUE TO REPAIR, RESTORATION, OR REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING IMPROVEMENTS DESIGNATED "TO BE PROTECTED" OR "TO REMAIN" WHICH ARE DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. 10. DEVIATIONS BETWEEN THE DRAWINGS AND ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE IMMEDIATE ATTENTION OF THE CITY AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. STEEL CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. ALL WELDS SHALL BE GROUND SMOOTH. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL NECESSARY HARDWARE, FASTENERS AND OTHER COMPONENTS NECESSARY TO MEET THE INTENT OF THE DRAWINGS. ALTERNATE CONNECTION METHODS WILL BE ACCEPTED ONLY WITH WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, CITY, AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WHERE APPLICABLE. 3. SHOP AND FIELD CONNECTIONS NOT SPECIFICALLY DETAILED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE BOLTED OR WELDED. 4. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE GALVANIZED. 5. STEEL MEMBERS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS THAT ARE TO BE ENCASED IN CONCRETE SHALL BE UNPAINTED ON THE CONTACT SURFACES AND SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH A MINIMUM W.W.F. 6X6 - W2.9 X W2.9 REINFORCING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS FOR ALL STEEL COMPONENTS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY CITY PRIOR TO MATERIAL PROCUREMENT OR INSTALLATION OF ANY COMPONENTS. CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION NOTES: 1. ALL CONCRETE FORMWORK SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO POURING ANY CONCRETE. 2. LAYOUT OF CONSTRUCTION JOINTS SHALL BE AS SHOWN IN THE DRAWINGS. 3. ALL SUBGRADE PREP, SUBBASE MATERIALS AND STRUCTURAL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE PER RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR AS APPROVED BY THE CITY INSPECTOR. 4. CONCRETE MIX DESIGN SHALL BE AS REQUIRED BY THE STRUCTURAL OR GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE CITY FOR COMPACTION TESTING PRIOR TO POURING ANY CONCRETE.

DOG AGILITY EQUIPMENT
PLOTTED: 9/29/2025 10:38 AM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L2.4 RIVERS EDGE - DETAILS.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8 L I C ENS ED L ANDS CA P E A RC H I T E C T S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS A RECYCLED CRAWL TUNNEL W/ DOG HOUSE B RP DOGGIE FENCE RUN C MINI PUP CLUBHOUSE D SIT & STAY BENCH E RECYCLED RING DOG JUMP RECYCLED CURVED TUNNEL W/ DOG HOUSE G HILLTOP CHALLENGE H STEPPING PAWS WEAVE POST FI

DOG AGILITY EQUIPMENT
PLOTTED: 9/29/2025 10:38 AM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L2.5 RIVERS EDGE - DETAILS.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8

L I C ENS ED
L AN
DS CA
P
E

A RC H I T E C T

S T A T E
O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS

J WASTE STATION

K FIRE HYDRANT

SIERRA STREET
AeccDbAlignment (AeccLand130)
140
145 B STREET 7 6 5 4 8 321 34" 34"114"34" 1"34" 34" 1" 1" 34" 2" 34"34" 114" 114" 34" 1" 1" 34" 34" 1" 34" 112" 1" 114" 34" 34" 114" 114"114" 114"34" 34" 1" 2" 1" 1" 1" 34" 114" 114" 34" BF FSMVM 1" 1" 34" 34" 1.35 A11" 4 A21" A B1 3.72 1" B2 17.4 1" 22.3 B31" 8.5 B41" B5 50.9 112" 34" 34" 1" 34" 34" 140
140
145
145
140
140
145
145 7 6 5 4
PLOTTED: 9/30/2025 4:04 PM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L3.1 RIVERS EDGE - IRRIG.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8 L I C ENS ED L ANDS CA P E A RC H I T E C T S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS IRRIGATION PLAN 0 20' 40' POINT-SOURCE DRIP BUBBLER LATERAL SIZING CHART THIS CHART IS PROVIDED AS A GUIDE FOR LATERAL LINE PIPE SIZING ASSOCIATED WITH THE POINT-SOURCE DRIP BUBBLER SYSTEM. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL SIZE ALL LATERAL LINES IN THE FIELD ACCORDING TO THIS CHART. FLOW (GPM) BUBBLER QUAN. PIPE SIZE (INCHES) 0-7 1-233 3/4 8-12 234-363 1 13-22 363-667 1 1/4 POC EQUIPMENT AND MAINLINE LOCATION IS SHOWN FOR GRAPHIC CLARITY. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE PLACED IN PLANTER BED. VERIFY FINAL LOCATION WITH CITY PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF EQUIPMENT. EXISTING 4" PVC MAINLINE TO REMAIN AND TO BE PROTECTED IN PLACE (VERIFY ACTUAL LOCATION IN FIELD). TIE NEW VALVES INTO EXISTING MAINLINE. SEE SHEET L3.2 FOR IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES MODIFY EXISTING SHRUB IRRIGATION IN THIS AREA TO ACCOMMODATE FOR NEW LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS. OBTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS FROM THE CITY OF RIVERBANK FOR EXISTING SYSTEM INFORMATION. EXISTING IRRIGATION CONTROLLER SCALE: 1"=50'-0" B EXISTING IRRIGATION CONTROLLER (VERIFY LOCATION IN FIELD) EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN INSTALL #14-1 AWG CONTROL VALVE WIRES FROM EXISTING CONTROLLER TO (5) NEW VALVES. HAND TRENCH ALONG EXISTING FENCE LINE FROM EXISTING CONTROLLER AND BURY WIRES A MINIMUM OF 18-INCHES DEEP. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKE CARE TO NOT DAMAGE ANY EXISTING LANDSCAPE OR IRRIGATION DURING TRENCHING. ANY LANDSCAPE OR IRRIGATION DAMAGED DURING TRENCHING SHALL BE REPLACED IN KIND TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY. (2) 2" SLEEVES 1" SERVICE LINE TO PET DRINKING FOUNTAIN (3) 2" SLEEVES MODIFY EXISTING SHRUB IRRIGATION IN THIS AREA TO ACCOMMODATE FOR NEW LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION IMPROVEMENTS. OBTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS FROM THE CITY OF RIVERBANK FOR EXISTING SYSTEM INFORMATION. CAP EXISTING POINT-SOURCE EMITTERS IN THIS AREA WHERE EXISTING PLANTS ARE BEING REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE FOR NEW MAINTENANCE ACCESS PAD

PLOTTED: 9/29/2025 10:43 AM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L3.2 RIVERS EDGE - IRRIG.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8 L I C ENS ED L ANDS CA P E A RC H I T E C T S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS IRRIGATION LEGEND AND NOTES EQUIPMENT SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL DESCRIPTION HUNTER HEB-20 2.0 GPH POINT-SOURCE DRIP BUBBLER MOUNTED ON 1/2" PVC IPS FLEX RISER EMITTER SCHEDULE: 1-GAL. SHRUBS: (1) HEB-20 EMITTERS 5-GAL. SHRUBS: (2) HEB-20 EMITTERS RAIN BIRD RWS-B-C-1401; 1401 0.25 GPM ROOT WATERING SYSTEM (1 PER TREE) WITH 0.25 GPM SUPPLEMENTAL SURFACE BUBBLER (1 PER TREE) - SYMBOL REPRESENTS BOTH ITEMS RAIN BIRD 100-PEB 1" ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL VALVE RAIN BIRD XCZ-100-PRBR 1" ELECTRIC REMOTE CONTROL DRIP ZONE KIT RAIN BIRD 33-LRC 3/4" QUICK COUPLER VALVE WITH LOCKING RUBBER COVER BUCKNER-SUPERIOR 3100-100 1" NORMALLY OPEN MASTER CONTROL VALVE FEBCO LF825Y 3/4" 3/4" LEAD-FREE REDUCED PRESSURE ZONE BACKFLOW PREVENTION ASSEMBLY HUNTER A2C-1200-PP 12-STATION CONTROLLER WITH PLASTIC PEDESTAL HUNTER A2C-1200-PP (EXISTING) EXISTING 12-STATION CONTROLLER WITH PLASTIC PEDESTAL. ADD HUNTER A2M 6-STATION EXPANSION MODULE TO CONTROLLER TO ACCOMMODATE NEW VALVES. CREATIVE SENSOR TECHNOLOGY FSI-T10-001 1" TEE TYPE FLOW SENSOR APPROVED 3/4" WATER METER (PROVIDED BY DEVELOPER) IRRIGATION LATERAL LINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 34" MINIMUM SIZE WITH PVC SCHEDULE 40 SOLVENT-WELD FITTINGS (SIZE PER PLAN - ALSO SEE DRIP BUBBLER LATERAL SIZING CHART) IRRIGATION MAINLINE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 FOR MAINLINE 2" AND SMALLER WITH PVC SCHEDULE 40 SOLVENT-WELD FITTINGS (SIZE PER PLAN). PIPE SLEEVE: PVC SCHEDULE 40 SIZES AND QUANTITIES PER PLAN MV BFAFSM NOTES: 1. SEE SHEETS L3.3-L3.4 FOR IRRIGATION DETAILS Valve Number Valve Size Valve Flow Valve Callout # # #" IRRIGATION_SCHEDULE GENERAL IRRIGATION SYSTEM NOTES: 1. DRAWINGS ARE DIAGRAMMATIC AND DO NOT NECESSARILY INDICATE ALL OFFSETS AND FITTINGS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTMENTS NECESSARY TO CONFORM TO ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS. 2. ALL EQUIPMENT INCLUDING MAINLINE, LATERAL LINES, AND VALVES SHOWN GRAPHICALLY IN HARDSCAPE AREAS, BUILDING FOOTPRINTS OR OFFSITE ARE FOR DESIGN CLARIFICATION ONLY AND SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN PLANTED AREAS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 3. IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE CODES AND ORDINANCES, INCLUDING ASABE/ICC 802-2014 and AB1881 IN CALIFORNIA. 4. WATER SERVICE LINE FOR THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE SIZE AND LOCATION AS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL IMPROVEMENT PLANS. WATER METER SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM THE CITY BY THE DEVELOPER AT THE DEVELOPER'S COST. 5. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE AND EFFECTIVE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING AREAS. DURING THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD, IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE ALL PLANT MATERIAL RECEIVES SUFFICIENT WATER FOR ESTABLISHMENT AND TO SUSTAIN PLANT HEALTH. 6. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED AND TESTED TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE CITY PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANT MATERIALS. 7. TRENCHING DEPTHS FOR IRRIGATION PIPING SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: MAINLINE: 24" LATERAL LINES: 12" IN PLANTERS / 16" IN TURF AREAS ALL DIMENSIONS ARE FROM THE TOP OF THE PIPE. 8. WHERE NOT SHOWN, LATERAL LINE SIZES FOR POINT-SOURCE BUBBLERS SHALL DETERMINED IN THE FIELD BY THE CONTRACTOR. MINIMUM LATERAL SIZE SHALL BE 3/4". SEE DRIP BUBBLER PIPE SIZING CHART TO DETERMINE THE REQUIRED PIPE SIZES BASED ON FLOW OR BUBBLER QUANTITY. 9. IF SETTLEMENT OCCURS ALONG TRENCHES AND ADJUSTMENT(S) TO PIPES, VALVES, OR HEADS IS REQUIRED, THE CONTRACTOR, AS PART OF WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT, SHALL MAKE ALL ADJUSTMENTS WITHOUT EXTRA COSTS TO THE OWNER. 10. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO FILL AND REPAIR ALL DEPRESSIONS AND REPLACE ALL NECESSARY LAWN AND/OR PLANTING DUE TO THE SETTLEMENT OF IRRIGATION FOR ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE ACCEPTED COMPLETION OF MAINTENANCE. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE THAT ALL FURNISHED MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP ARE FREE OF DEFECTS FOR ONE YEAR FOLLOWING THE ACCEPTED COMPLETION OF MAINTENANCE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE LIABLE FOR REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT OF DEFICIENT MATERIALS DURING THIS GUARANTEE PERIOD. 12. SPLICING OF IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRES WILL NOT BE PERMITTED EXCEPT IN VALVE BOXES. WIRE CONNECTORS SHALL BE 3M DBR/Y-6, OR AS SPECIFIED IN DETAILS, INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 13. CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE SIZED AS DESIGNATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND SHALL BE INSTALLED IN VALVE BOXES AS INDICATED IN THE DETAILS. BOXES SHALL BE SET FLUSH WITH THE FINISH GRADE OR SURFACE AND PERMANENTLY MARKED AS INDICATED IN THE DETAILS. 14. ALL CONTROL VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED A MINIMUM OF TEN (10) FEET FROM TREES. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL MARK ALL PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY CONTROL VALVES TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. 15. FINAL LOCATION OF ALL MAJOR IRRIGATION SYSTEM COMPONENTS INCLUDING IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS, BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES, BOOSTER PUMPS, ETC. SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 16. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR FOR ALL LINE VOLTAGE ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS TO IRRIGATION CONTROLLERS AND BOOSTER PUMPS. 17. POINT-SOURCE BUBBLERS SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE PLANT MATERIAL BEING IRRIGATED. SEE IRRIGATION LEGEND FOR QUANTITY REQUIRED PER CONTAINER SIZE. 18. A LAMINATED, COLOR-CODED, REDUCED SIZE IRRIGATION PLAN SHALL BE FURNISHED TO THE OWNER PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD. PLACE ANOTHER LAMINATED COPY INSIDE THE CONTROLLER CABINET DOOR. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL LATERAL LINE CHECK VALVES WHERE NECESSARY TO PREVENT LOW HEAD DRAINAGE. MODEL SHALL BE NDS FLO CONTROL SPRING CHECK VALVE RATED TO 200 PSI, MODEL 1790 (SLIP X SLIP CONNECTION WITH UNION), LINE SIZE OR APPROVED EQUAL. 20. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE AN IRRIGATION AUDIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL WELO AND TITLE 23 DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES SECTION 492.12: IRRIGATION AUDIT, IRRIGATION SURVEY, AND IRRIGATION WATER USE ANALYSIS, PRIOR TO PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION AS REQUIRED TO THE CITY OF RIVERBANK. SEE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS TITLE 23 WATER DIVISION 2 DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES CHAPTER 2.7: MODEL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE, APPENDIX C. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT WILLFULLY INSTALL THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS WHEN IT IS OBVIOUS IN THE FIELD THAT OBSTRUCTIONS, GRADE DIFFERENCES OR DIFFERENCES IN THE AREA DIMENSIONS EXIST THAT MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN CONSIDERED IN THE ENGINEERING OF THE SYSTEM. SUCH OBSTRUCTIONS OF DIFFERENCES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE CITY AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO COMMENCING WITH ANY WORK. IRRIGATION SLEEVING NOTES: 1. ALL LATERAL AND MAINLINE PIPING UNDER PAVING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN PVC SCHEDULE 40 SLEEVES, A MINIMUM OF TWO TIMES THE DIAMETER OF THE PIPE BEING SLEEVED. ALL PIPING SHALL BE SLEEVED INDIVIDUALLY - MULTIPLE PIPES WITHIN A SLEEVE SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED. 2. TWO-WIRE PATH SHALL BE INSTALLED IN MINIMUM 2" PVC SCHEDULE 40 GRAY CONDUIT. CONDUIT MAY OCCUPY THE SAME SLEEVE AS THE MAINLINE. 3. IRRIGATION SLEEVES ON PLANS ARE SHOWN BASED ON THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S ANTICIPATED MAIN AND LATERAL PIPE ROUTING. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL SLEEVE LOCATIONS NEEDED IN THE FIELD BASED ON ACTUAL PIPE ROUTING. 4. ALL ROADWAYS AND DRIVEWAYS SHALL HAVE ONE (1) EXTRA SLEEVE INSTALLED BESIDE THE PRIMARY SLEEVE IN THE EVENT OF PRIMARY SLEEVE FAILURE. THE SIZE OF THE EXTRA SLEEVE SHALL MATCH THE SIZE OF THE LARGEST SLEEVE AT THAT LOCATION. 5. ALL IRRIGATION SLEEVES CROSSING ROADWAYS SHALL BE PERMANENTLY MARKED WITH A 2-INCH TALL "I", ETCHED INTO THE CURB DIRECTLY ABOVE THE SLEEVE, ON BOTH ENDS OF THE SLEEVE. RECORD DRAWINGS: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE RECORD DRAWINGS OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO THE CITY PRIOR TO THE START OF THE MAINTENANCE PERIOD. RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON 24"X36" SHEETS AND SHALL INCLUDE THE ACTUAL INSTALLED LOCATION OF THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS, WITH DIMENSIONS FROM TWO PERMANENT POINTS OF REFERENCE: · IRRIGATION MAINLINE / TWO WIRE PATH · CONTROL VALVES · QUICK COUPLER VALVES · GATE VALVES · CONTROLLER · SPLICE BOXES · MAINLINE AND WIRE STUBS FOR FUTURE CONNECTIONS · TWO-WIRE GROUNDING · POC EQUIPMENT, INCLUDING WATER METER, MASTER VALVE, FLOW SENSOR, BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND BOOSTER PUMP 2. RECORD DRAWINGS SHALL BE UPDATED DAILY AND KEPT ON THE PROJECT SITE AT ALL TIMES. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO PROVIDE TWO COLOR-CODED CONTROLLER CHARTS TO THE CITY SHOWING THE COVERAGE AREA OF ALL IRRIGATION ZONES ON A LAMINATED 11"X17" SHEET. SPRINKLER HEADS SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL ARC PSI GPM RADIUS HUNTER MP2000 PROS-06-PRS30-CV G 210-270 35 0.81-1.03 18' HUNTER MP2000 PROS-06-PRS30-CV K 90-210 35 0.40-0.81 18' HUNTER MP2000 PROS-06-PRS30-CV R 360 35 1.37 18' B NUMBER MODEL SIZE TYPE GPM DESIGN PSI PSI PRECIP A1 RAIN BIRD XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS 1.35 20 27.0 0.08 in/h A2 RAIN BIRD PEB 1" BUBBLER 4 30 32.0 1.7 in/h B1 RAIN BIRD XCZ-100-PRB-COM 1" AREA FOR DRIP EMITTERS 3.72 20 27.3 0.18 in/h B2 RAIN BIRD PEB 1" TURF ROTARY 17.44 35 40.8 0.71 in/h B3 RAIN BIRD PEB 1" TURF ROTARY 22.33 35 41.8 0.65 in/h B4 RAIN BIRD PEB 1" BUBBLER 8.5 30 34.0 1.7 in/h B5 RAIN BIRD PEB 1-1/2" TURF ROTARY 50.88 35 43.1 0.64 in/h VALVE SCHEDULE

PLOTTED: 9/29/2025 10:43 AM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L3.3 RIVERS EDGE - IRRIG.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8

L I C ENS ED
L AN
DS CA
P
E

A RC H I T E C T

S T A T E
O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS IRRIGATION DETAILS REDUCED PRESSURE BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE FOR SIZES 3/4" TO 2" NOT TO SCALE LEAD-FREE RP BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE - SEE PLAN FOR SIZE, MANUFACTURER AND MODEL NUMBER BACKFLOW ENCLOSURE - HGS SERIES BY GUARDSHACK OR APPROVED EQUAL INSULATION BLANKET - FROSTGUARD BY GUARDSHACK OR APPROVED EQUAL 6" THICK CONCRETE PAD SIZED TO PROVIDE A MIN. OF 4" OF CLEARANCE ON ALL SIDES ON ENCLOSURE MIN. 3"L GALVANIZED IRON NIPPLE GALVANIZED IRON NIPPLE - LENGTH AS REQUIRED GALVANIZED IRON 90° ELBOW GALVANIZED IRON UNION 1 2345
678
1 23
4 5
6 6
5 8
5 8
7 5
7 7
7 9
9 SCHEDULE 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER FINISH GRADE MULCH LAYER - SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN COMPACTED SUBGRADE PVC MAINLINE FROM WATER SERVICE PER PLAN PVC MAINLINE TO IRRIGATION SYSTEM PER PLAN PADLOCK BY OWNER 91011 11 10 12 12 12" MIN. 6" MAINLINE DEPTH PER PLAN 1314 14 13 NOTES: 1. USE PIPE JOINT COMPOUND ON ALL METAL TO METAL CONNECTIONS. 2. USE PTFE TAPE ON ALL PVC TO METAL CONNECTIONS. 3. ALL BELOW GROUND METAL PIPING SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH VINYL CORROSION PROTECTION TAPE (3M 51 SERIES OR EQUAL) 15 15 4" MIN. 4" MIN. REMOTE CONTROL VALVE NTS NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL LOCAL CODES. 2. INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 3. INSTALL IN MANIFOLDS WHENEVER POSSIBLE, SEE INSTALLATION DIAGRAMS. FINISHED GRADE CONTROL WIRES WITH 36" SERVICE COIL AND 3M DBY WIRE CONNECTORS CHRISTY N16 VALVE BOX WITH N16J CAST IRON BOLT-DOWN LID PVC MAINLINE SCH 40 PVC ELL CONTROL WIRES TO CONTROLLER PVC MAINLINE FITTING INLINE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE SCH 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER SCH 40 PVC BALL VALVE SCH 80 PVC CLOSE NIPPLE PEA GRAVEL SUMP, 6"MIN BRICK SUPPORT, 1 PER CORNER LATERAL LINE TO DRIP 1 3
2345
67891011141516
2 7
8 13 12 11 10 14 1 4
5 16
6 MULCH LAYER PER PLAN 12
9 VALVE I.D. TAG 13 16
9 REMOTE CONTROL DRIP ZONE KIT NTS NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL LOCAL CODES. 2. INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 3. INSTALL IN MANIFOLDS WHENEVER POSSIBLE, SEE INSTALLATION DIAGRAMS. FINISHED GRADE CONTROL WIRES WITH 36" SERVICE COIL AND 3M DBY WIRE CONNECTORS CHRISTY N16 CONCRETE VALVE BOX WITH N16J BOLT-DOWN LID PVC MAINLINE SCH 40 PVC ELL CONTROL WIRES TO CONTROLLER PVC MAINLINE FITTING INLINE REMOTE CONTROL VALVE MESH Y-FILTER PRESSURE REGULATOR SCH 40 PVC MALE ADAPTER SCH 40 PVC BALL VALVE SCH 80 PVC CLOSE NIPPLE PEA GRAVEL SUMP, 6"MIN BRICK SUPPORT, 1 PER CORNER LATERAL LINE TO DRIP 1 3
2 3
45 67
8910111213141516
2 7 10
8 15 11
9 14 13 12 16 1 4
5 17
6 17 MULCH LAYER PER PLAN 11 18 VALVE I.D. TAG 18 FLOW FLOW SENSOR NTS NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL LOCAL CODES. 2. INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 1 FINISHED GRADE CHRISTY B09 CONCRETE VALVE BOX WITH B09TL CAST IRON LOCKING LID 2 FLOW SENSOR CABLE TO IRRIGATION CONTROLLER AS REQUIRED BY SENSOR MANUFACTURER WITH 3M DBY WIRE CONNECTORS 3 4 FLOW SENSOR, SEE LEGEND5 PVC 45 DEGREE ELL PVC 45 DEGREE ELL, BUSH DOWN TO FLOW METER SIZE AS NECESSARY 67 MAINLINE
8 PEA GRAVEL SUMP, 6"MIN9 BRICK SUPPORT, 1 PER CORNER
1 2
3 4
7 5
5 7
9 MIN 10x PIPE DIAMETER UPSTREAM OF STRAIGHT PIPE 10
6 8 11 10 MIN 5x PIPE DIAMETER DOWNSTREAM OF STRAIGHT PIPE 11 12 12 MULCH LAYER PER PLAN INSTALL AT 60 - 90° ANGLE IF POSSIBLE MASTER CONTROL VALVE NTS NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL LOCAL CODES. 2. INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. 1 MASTER VALVE, SEE LEGEND CHRISTY B09 CONCRETE VALVE BOX WITH B09TL CAST IRON LOCKING LID 23 FINISHED GRADE MAINLINE FROM POINT OF CONNECTION45 SCH 80 PVC MALE ADAPTER 6 PEA GRAVEL SUMP, MIN 6"7 3M DBY WIRE CONNECTOR CONTROL AND COMMON WIRE TO DESIGNATED AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION CONTROLLER 89 BRICK SUPPORT, 1 PER CORNER SECTION
4 5 1 2
6 7
9 10 10 MULCH LAYER PER PLAN
8 FLOW11 11 MAINLINE TO FLOW SENSOR
5 3 QUICK COUPLING VALVE NTS NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM WITH ALL LOCAL CODES. 2. INSTALL IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS. CHRISTY G03T CONCRETE VALVE BOX WITH G03CT CAST IRON BLOT-DOWN LID 1 2 FINISHED GRADE3 PEA GRAVEL SUMP, 6"MIN 8"LONG SCH 80 PVC THREADED NIPPLE 4 SCH 80 PVC THREADED 90-DEGREE ELL
5 6 PVC MAINLINE7 MAINLINE FITTING 10"LONG SCH 80 PVC THREADED NIPPLE8 QUICK COUPLING VALVE, SEE LEGEND9 #4 X 30" LONG REBAR STAKE WITH (2) STAINLESS STEEL WORM GEAR HOSE CLAMPS 1011 BRICK SUPPORTS, (2) TOTAL 2 1
34105
6 8
7 9 1112 12 SCH 40 PVC 90-DEGREE STREET ELL 12 13 13 MULCH LAYER PER PLAN A
B
C
D
E
F
H

G POP-UP SPRINKLER NOT TO SCALE POP-UP SPRINKLER PER PLAN 1 2" HDPE MARLEX STREET ELL (MIPTXFIPT)
1 2" SCHEDULE 80 PVC NIPPLE (TBE) PVC LATERAL LINE FITTING PVC LATERAL LINE PER PLAN FINISH GRADE 1 23
4 5
6 1
3 2
2 4
5 2 PLASTIC PEDESTAL MOUNT CONTROLLER NTS NOTES: 1. ALL CONDUITS AND FITTINGS SHALL BE GRAY SCHEDULE 40 PVC. 2. VERIFY CONTROLLER LOCATION WITH OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 3. 110/120 VAC ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS SHALL BE MADE BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR. PLASTIC CONTROLLER PEDESTAL PER IRRIGATION LEGEND 1 CONCRETE PEDESTAL BASE PER PEDESTAL MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS - ENSURE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM PEDESTAL 2 1" ELECTRICAL SUPPLY CONDUIT STUBBED OUT OF PEDESTAL FOR CONNECTION BY ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR3 4 1" GROUND WIRE CONDUIT CONTROL VALVE WIRE CONDUIT (SIZE

AS REQUIRED TO ACCOMMODATE WIRES)
5 7 CONTROL WIRES TO CONTROL VALVES8 FINISH GRADE
76 1
8 2
3 4
5 6 90-DEGREE SWEEP ELBOWS

PLOTTED: 9/29/2025 10:43 AM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L3.4 RIVERS EDGE - IRRIG.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8 L I C ENS ED L ANDS CA P E A RC H I T E C T S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS IRRIGATION DETAILS AB CDE INSTALLATION DIAGRAMS NTS NOTES: 1. SLEEVE BELOW ALL HARDSCAPE ELEMENTS, SEE LEGEND FOR SIZING. 2. CENTER VALVE BOX OVER REMOTE CONTROL VALVE (RCV). 3. SET RCV AND BOX ASSEMBLY IN PLANTING AREA WHERE POSSIBLE. INSTALL IN TURF ONLY IF GROUNDCOVER/SHRUBS AREA DOES NOT EXIST. 4. SET BOXES PARALLEL TO EACH OTHER AND PERPENDICULAR TO EDGE OF HARDSCAPE/STRUCTURE. 5. AVOID HEAVILY COMPACTING SOIL AROUND BOXES TO PREVENT COLLAPSE AND DEFORMATION OF BOX SIDES. 6. INSTALL EXTENSION BY BOX MANUFACTURER AS REQUIRED TO COMPLETELY ENCLOSE ASSEMBLY FOR EASY ACCESS. 7. NEVER INSTALL BOX IN HARDSCAPE UNLESS EXPLICITLY NOTED OTHERWISE IN PLANS. 1 FINISHED GRADE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 2" CLEAR BETWEEN PIPES 2 PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 3" SAND ENVELOPE AROUND ALL MAINLINE 3 SNAKE SOLVENT-WELD PLASTIC PIPING IN TRENCH AS SHOWN 4 TIE 24" LOOP IN WIRING AT CHANGES OF DIRECTION OF 30 DEGREES OR MORE. UNTIE AFTER ALL CONNECTIONS HAVE BEEN MADE. 5 INSTALL WIRING BENEATH AND BESIDE MAINLINE. TAPE AND BUNDLE AT 10-FOOT INTERVALS. 6 16"X25" RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX FOR EMITTER MANIFOLD ASSEMBLY 7 14"X19" RECTANGULAR VALVE BOX FOR REMOTE CONTROL VALVE 89 QUICK COUPLING VALVE EDGE OF HARDSCAPE, PLANTING, STRUCTURE, ETC. 11 TRENCH SECTION VALVE LAYOUT PLAN 12" SPACING, 12" TYPICAL 12"MIN MAINLINE, LATERAL & WIRING IN SAME TRENCH MAINLINE LATERAL WIRING IN CONDUIT 1 2 3 3 4 5 6 8 7 10 11 10 PVC BALL VALVE 9 MAINLINE 12" TREE BUBBLERS NTS 1 FINISHED GRADE ROOT WATERING SYSTEM PER PLAN 23 TREE ROOT BALL 4 PVC LATERAL LINE PER PLAN 5 SURFACE BUBBLER PER PLAN 6 MULCH LAYER PER PLAN 1 7 2" PVC IPS FLEX HOSE 12" SCH. 40 BLACK PVC MALE ADAPTER (SPEARS 436-005B OR EQUAL) 89 PVC LATERAL LINE TEE OR ELL 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6" GALV. STEEL SOIL STAPLE 11 11 TREE TRUNK 12 12 PLANTING PIT 13 13 12" HDPE MARLEX STREET ELL IRRIGATION SLEEVE AT ROADWAY NOT TO SCALE CURB AND GUTTER LANDSCAPE PLANTER OR ATTACHED SIDEWALK (SEE PLAN) A.C. PAVING SCHEDULE 40 PVC IRRIGATION SLEEVE (SEE PLAN FOR SIZE AND QUANTITIES) PVC MAINLINE OR LATERAL LINE PER PLAN 2" TALL LETTER "I" PERMANENTLTY ETCHED INTO TOP OF CURB DIRECTLY OVER PIPE SLEEVE 12345 2 1 4 3 5 24" MIN. 12" MIN. PLAN VIEW SECTION 6 6 IRRIGATION SLEEVE AT SIDEWALK NOT TO SCALE SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE PLANTER SCHEDULE 40 PVC IRRIGATION SLEEVE (SEE PLAN FOR SIZE AND QUANTITIES) PVC MAINLINE OR LATERAL LINE PER PLAN 1234 12" MIN. 24" MIN. 3 4 1 2 POINT-SOURCE DRIP EMITTER NOT TO SCALE SHRUB OR TREE PER PLAN POINT-SOURCE EMITTER PER PLAN 12" SCH. 40 BLACK PVC MALE ADAPTER (SPEARS 436-005B OR EQUAL) 12" HDPE MARLEX STREET ELL 12" PVC IPS FLEX HOSE SCHEDULE 40 PVC ELBOW OR TEE FINISH GRADE PVC LATERAL LINE PER PLAN MULCH LAYER PER PLAN ROOT BALL 6" GALV. STEEL SOIL STAPLE 12345678 SECTION 910 12" 3 5 7 8 2 1 9 11 4 11 6 10

PLOTTED: 9/29/2025 10:39 AM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L3.5 RIVERS EDGE - IRRIG.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8 L I C ENS ED L ANDS CA P E A RC H I T E C T S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS MWELO WATER USE CALCULATIONS Date: Project Name: Project Contact: Project Contact Email: Project Type ETo ETAF Special Landscape Area (SLA) Total Landscape Area including SLA MAWA (gal/yr) Non-residential 5 0.3 0.45 - 3,397 47,672 MAWA =(ETo) * (0.62) *[(ETAF*LA) + ((1-ETAF) * SLA)]. ETo (SF * PF) / IE SLA ETWU (gal/yr) 50.3 1,258 - 39,237 ETWU =(ETo) * (0.62) *[(PF*SF/IE) + SLA] 8,436 Project meets water budget. ETWU Calculation (Regular landscape areas) Zone # Description Select Irrigation Square Feet (SF) Plant Factor (PF) Irrigation Efficiency (IE) (SF * PF) / IE 1 Low Water Use Shrubs/Groundcover Drip 3,197 0.30 0.81 1,184 2 Trees Bubbler 200 0.30 0.81 74 3 - 4 - 3 ,397 1,258 Square Feet (SF) (SF * PF) / IE - - - - 0 0 3,397 Total SLA 1.0 1.0 1.0 Description Plant Factor / Irrigation Efficiency (PF/IE) ETWU Calculation Special Landscape Areas (SLA) River's Edge - Controller 'A' Jeff Azevedo [email protected] Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU) Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) Edible planting area Total Landscape Area (including SLA) from ETWU Calculation 5/29/2025 Landscape area (not including SLA) Pool 1.0 Multi-use and sports field turf area Area irrigated with recycled water Difference between MAWA and ETWU Date: Project Name: Project Contact: Project Contact Email: Project Type ETo ETAF Special Landscape Area (SLA) Total Landscape Area including SLA MAWA (gal/yr) Non-residential 5 0.3 0.45 12,302 21,307 510,024 MAWA =(ETo) * (0.62) *[(ETAF*LA) + ((1-ETAF) * SLA)]. ETo (SF * PF) / IE SLA ETWU (gal/yr) 50.3 1,309 12,302 424,469 ETWU =(ETo) * (0.62) *[(PF*SF/IE) + SLA] 85,554 Project meets water budget. ETWU Calculation (Regular landscape areas) Zone # Description Select Irrigation Square Feet (SF) Plant Factor (PF) Irrigation Efficiency (IE) (SF * PF) / IE 1 Low Water Use Shrubs/Groundcover Drip 2,934 0.30 0.81 1,087 2 Trees Bubbler 450 0.40 0.81 222 3 Decomposed Granite 4,931 - 4 Synthetic Turf 690 - 9 ,005 1,309 Square Feet (SF) (SF * PF) / IE - 12,302 12,302 - - 12,302 12,302 Total Landscape Area (including SLA) from ETWU Calculation 21,307 5/29/2025 Landscape area (not including SLA) Pool 1.0 Multi-use and sports field turf area Area irrigated with recycled water Difference between MAWA and ETWU Total SLA 1.0 1.0 1.0 Description Plant Factor / Irrigation Efficiency (PF/IE) ETWU Calculation Special Landscape Areas (SLA) River's Edge - Controller 'B' Jeff Azevedo [email protected] Estimated Total Water Use (ETWU) Maximum Applied Water Allowance (MAWA) Edible planting area WATER BUDGET AND WATER USE CALCULATOR CONTROLLER 'A' WATER BUDGET AND WATER USE CALCULATOR CONTROLLER 'B'

AeccDbAlignment (AeccLand130) B STREET 7 6 5 4 8 321 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O OOO O O O O O O O O O O O O O

SIERRA STREET
PLOTTED: 9/30/2025 4:10 PM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L4.1 RIVERS EDGE - PLANT.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8 L I C ENS ED L ANDS CA P E A RC H I T E C T S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS PLANTING PLAN 0 20' 40' EXISTING DRAINAGE BASIN SEE SHEET L4.2 FOR PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES REMOVE EXISTING PLANTING IN THIS AREA TO ACCOMMODATE FOR NEW MAINTENANCE ACCESS PAD REMOVE EXISTING PLANTING IN THIS AREA TO ACCOMMODATE FOR LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS

PLOTTED: 9/29/2025 10:41 AM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L4.2 RIVERS EDGE - PLANT.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8 L I C ENS ED L ANDS CA P E A RC H I T E C T S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS PLANTING LEGEND AND NOTES PLANTING NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL LABOR, MATERIALS, AND EQUIPMENT NECESSARY TO FURNISH AND INSTALL PLANT MATERIAL AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND AS DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. 2. UNLESS DESIGNATED ON THE DRAWINGS OTHERWISE, STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS AND HARDSCAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO PLANTING OPERATIONS. 3. PLANT LIST ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE USED AS A GUIDE ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL TAKEOFF AND VERIFY SIZES AND QUANTITIES BY PLAN CHECK. 4. A SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR AND SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE FOLLOWED PER THE REPORT. PHYSICAL COPIES OF THE SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE SOIL MANAGEMENT REPORT SHALL CONFORM TO STATE AB1881 WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE (WELO) OR LOCAL AGENCY ADOPTED WELO. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A SOILS MANAGEMENT REPORT AFTER GRADING OPERATIONS AND PRIOR TO PLANT INSTALLATION. 5. FOR BIDDING PURPOSES, CONTRACTOR SHALL INCLUDE IN BID THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENT QUATITIES: -4 CUBIC YARDS/1,000 SF NITRIFIED ORGANIC COMPOST -25 LBS./1,000 SF COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER 6. ALL SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE EVENLY SPREAD AND THOROUGHLY INCORPORATED INTO THE NATIVE SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 12 INCHES BY MEANS OF ROTOTILLER OR OTHER IMPLEMENT. 7. NO SOIL AMENDMENTS, COMPOSTS, FERTILIZERS, ETC. SHALL BE APPLIED TO STORMWATER TREATMENT AREAS WHERE BIOTREATMENT SOIL MIX IS TO BE INSTALLED. 8. SAMPLES OF FERTILIZERS, ORGANIC AMENDMENT, SOIL CONDITIONERS, AND SEED SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT OR INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH TO THE CITY A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE FOR SUCH FURNISHED MATERIALS. 9. ALL WORK ON THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM, INCLUDING HYDROSTATIC, COVERAGE, AND OPERATIONAL TESTS AND THE BACKFILLING AND COMPACTION OF TRENCHES SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSPECTED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO PLANTING OPERATIONS. 10. LOCATIONS OF ALL TREES SHALL BE REVIEWED ON SITE BY THE CITY'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 11. TREES SHALL BE PLANTED NO CLOSER THAN TEN (10) FEET FROM EXISTING UTILITIES AND NO CLOSER THAN FIVE (5) FEET FROM NEW UTILITIES. 12. TREES PLANTED WITHIN TEN (10) FEET OF HARDSCAPE OR STRUCTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A LINEAR ROOT BARRIER, MODEL #UB 18-2 BY DEEPROOT, OR APPROVED EQUAL. 13. ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE SELECTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1). FOR STANDARD FORM TREES, CALIPER SIZE SHALL BE MEASURED 6" ABOVE THE SOIL LINE FOR CALIPERS EQUAL TO OR LESS THAN 4". FOR CALIPERS GREATER THAN 4" CALIPER SHALL BE MEASURED 12" ABOVE THE SOIL LINE. FOR MULTI-TRUNK TREES THE CALIPER SHALL BE ESTABLISHED BY TAKING THE AVERAGE OF THE CALIPER OF THE TWO LARGEST TRUNKS. CALIPER IS MEASURED 6" ABOVE THE ORIGINATION POINT OF THE SECOND LARGEST TRUNK OR 6" ABOVE GROUND IF ALL TRUNKS ORIGINATE FROM THE SOIL. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE INSPECTED FOR QUALITY AND HEALTH BY THE CITY'S DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CALIPER SIZE STANDARDS: 15 GALLON: 0.75 - 1.25" 24" BOX: 1.25 - 2" 36" BOX: 2 - 3.5" 48" BOX: 3.5 - 5" 60" BOX: 4 - 6" 14. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL RECEIVE BEST-PAK 20-10-5 FERTILIZER PACKETS, INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS AT THE FOLLOWING RATES: 1-GALLON CONTAINERS: (1) PAK 2 AND 3-GALLON CONTAINERS: (2) PAKS 5-GALLON CONTAINERS: (3) PAKS 15-GALLON CONTAINERS: (9) PAKS 24" BOX TREES AND LARGER: (8) PAKS FOR EVERY 12 INCHES OF BOX SIZE 15. ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER SHALL RECEIVE A 3-INCH THICK LAYER OF ORGANIC MULCH. MULCH SHALL BE "DARK BROWN DECORATIVE MULCH" FROM RECOLOGY BLOSSOM VALLEY ORGANICS, OR APPROVED EQUAL. A SAMPLE OF THE MULCH SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT OR INSTALLATION. 16. APPLY SNAPSHOT 2.5 TG PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE OR APPROVED EQUAL FOR WEED CONTROL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS TO ALL SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER AREAS AFTER PLANTING AND PRIOR TO MULCH APPLICATION. PRE-EMERGENT SHALL BE THOROUGHLY WATERED IN TO ENSURE THE HERBICIDE MOVES THROUGH THE SOIL TO THE SEEDS. 17. ALL LANDSCAPING INSTALLED UNDER THE SCOPE OF THESE PLANS SHALL BE MAINTAINED BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR FOR A MINIMUM OF NINETY (90) CALENDAR DAYS, AND SHALL CONTINUE UNTIL ALL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. THE DEVELOPER SHALL BEAR THE COST OF THE MAINTENANCE UNTIL THE PROJECT IS ACCEPTED. REFER TO CITY OF MANTECA LANDSCAPE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR INFORMATION ON MAINTENANCE PERIOD REQUIREMENTS. 18. ALL PLANT MATERIALS INSTALLED UNDER THIS PROJECT SCOPE SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR AGAINST DEFECTIVE MATERIALS AND/OR WORKMANSHIP FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR. SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME SIZE QTY WATER USE TREES ACER RUBRUM 'ARMSTRONG' 15 GAL 5 MEDIUM PINUS ELDARICA 15 GAL 4 LOW PISTACIA CHINENSIS `KEITH DAVEY` 15 GAL 17 LOW SHRUBS CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' 5 GAL 70 LOW DIANELLA REVOLUTA 'DR5000' 1 GAL 161 LOW OLEA EUROPAEA 'LITTLE OLLIE' 5 GAL 34 LOW RHAPHIOLEPIS UMBELLATA 'MINOR' 5 GAL 47 LOW SALVIA GREGGII 'BLUE NOTE' 1 GAL 110 LOW SYMBOL BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING QTY WATER USE GROUND COVERS LANTANA X 'NEW GOLD' 1 GAL 48" o.c. 38 LOW MYOPORUM PARVIFOLIUM 1 GAL 48" o.c. 141 LOW SOD/SEED TURF SOD BOLERO PLUS SOD 12,352 SF HIGH / SLA O PLANT_SCHEDULE

PLOTTED: 9/29/2025 10:41 AM THIS DRAWING IS THE PROPERTY OF siTe. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES MAY THIS DRAWING OR ANY IDEA ON THE DRAWING BE REPRODUCED WITHOUT WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE FROM siTe. ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS MUST BE CHECKED AND VERIFIED ON-SITE BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SUBCONTRACTORS PRIOR TO PERFORMING THE WORK. THE PROJECT MANAGER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK.

RIVER'S EDGE
RIVERBANK, CALIFONIA REV# DATE DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO.: DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED BY: DATE: SCALE: CAD DWG FILE: 12238 JWA OGP JWA 2025.05.07 2025.05.07 PERMIT SUBMITTAL L4.3 RIVERS EDGE - PLANT.DWG MATTHEW B . HAWKS # 6 5 0 8 L I C ENS ED L ANDS CA P E A RC H I T E C T S T A T E O F C A L I F O R N I ASIGNATURE RENEWAL DATE DATE 3/31/27 2025.07.24 CITY COMMENTS 9/26/25 2025.09.26 CITY COMMENTS PLANTING DETAILS A D C B PLANTING NOT TO SCALE 23451 PLANT OR TREE PER PLAN FINISH GRADE AGRIFORM 20-10-5 FERTILIZER TABLETS AT THE FOLLOWING RATES: 1-GALLON: 1 TABLET 2-GALLON: 2 TABLETS 5-GALLON: 3 TABLETS 15-GALLON: 5 TABLETS 24" BOX: 8 TABLETS 36" BOX: 12 TABLETS 48" BOX: 16 TABLETS NATIVE SOIL BACKFILL MULCH LAYER PER PLAN PLANT ROOT BALL UNDISTURBED SOIL EXACAVATE PLANT PIT TO 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH 1" 1 2 3 NOTES: 1. INSTALL CROWN OF ROOT BALL 1" ABOVE FINISH GRADE. 2. LEAVE MULCH 12" AWAY FROM BASE OF THE PLANT. 3. ANY OVER-EXCAVATION OF BOTTOM OF PLANT PIT MUST BE RECOMPACTED TO PREVENT SETTLEMENT. 4 6 7 5 7 6 SHRUB AND GROUNDCOVER SPACING NOT TO SCALE NOTES: 1. PLANTS TO BE PLANTED IN TRIANGULAR SPACING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANTING PLAN. 2. INFILL PLANTS AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SPACING AT IRREGULAR EDGES. 3. IF ACCENT SHRUBS ARE PRESENT IN GROUNDCOVER, ENSURE SHRUB SPACING REMAINS CONSISTENT WITH ADJACENT GROUNDCOVER SPACING UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EQUAL EQUAL EQUAL 1/2 PLANT SPACING PLUS 3" CENTER OF PLANT, SEE PLAN FOR TYPE 1 SEE PLANTING PLAN OR PLANTING LEGEND FOR SPACING 2 EDGE OF PLANTING AREA, SEE PLAN 3 123 NOTES: 1. ANY TREES PLANTED WITHIN 5' OF HARDSCAPE OR STRUCTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A 16' LINEAR ROOT BARRIER PANEL, CENTERED ON TREE. 2. TREES PLANTED WITHIN 10' OF WATER, STORM DRAIN OR SEWER LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A ROOT BARRIER. INSTALL 36" DEEP ROOT BARRIER WHEN TREE IS WITHIN 6' OF ANY SUCH UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES. 3. NO ROOT BARRIERS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 5' OF WATER OR SEWER LINES. LINEAR ROOT BARRIER NOT TO SCALE 2 8' CONDITION 1 - PLAN CONDITION 2 - PLAN 8' 8' 16' CONDITION 3 - PLAN 1 2 1 231 TREE PER PLAN TREE TRUNK 18" DEEP LINEAR ROOT BARRIER AT EDGE OF PAVING OR OTHER HARDSCAPE SURFACE 24" DEEP LINEAR ROOT BARRIER AT BACK OF CURB PLANTER/FINISH GRADE ROOT BALL TREE STAKES - SEE TREE STAKING DETAIL MULCH PER PLAN 4567 TYPICAL SECTION 1 2 27 4 3 4 6 3 1" 1" 5 8 7 4 5 5 TREE STAKING NOT TO SCALE 231 TREE PER PLAN TWO (2) 2" DIA. X 10' LONG PRESSURE-TREATED PINE LODGEPOLE STAKES FOUR (4) CINCH TIES BY V.I.T. PRODUCTS IN 'FIGURE 8' CONFIGURATION, INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FINISH GRADE PLANT PIT AND BACKFILL - SEE PLANTING DETAIL TREE TRUNK ROOT BALL UNDISTURBED SOIL TRUNK GUARD FOR TREES PLANTED IN TURF AREAS NOTES: 1. DO NOT DRIVE STAKES INTO ROOT BALL. 2. REMOVE NURSERY STAKES PRIOR TO STAKING. 3. SEE PLANTING DETAIL FOR PLANTING PROCEDURE. 4 1 4567 23 578 PLAN ELEVATION SECTIONPREVAILING WIND 8 6 2 6 2 9 9 3

CC/LRA – 06/09/2026
CC Resolution 2026-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK

APPROVING PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT FEE CREDITS FOR LGI HOMES FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A DOG PARK ON LOT A WITHIN THE RIVER’S EDGE

SUBDIVISION

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CITY COUNCIL”) DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, it is necessary as established in the Riverbank Municipal Code for the proper and effective operation of City Government to establish, amend or authorize fees for services in order to provide for the financial support of City Government; and WHEREAS, from time to time, the City Council reviews the City’s fees to ensure that they are adequately supporting the operation of City Government and the public facilities needed to serve new development; and
WHEREAS, the City currently collects System Development Fees at building permit issuance to defray the impact of new development as authorized by Government Code sections 66000 through 66025; and
WHEREAS, the City’s System Development Fee program is codified in Riverbank Municipal Code section 150.30, titled “System Development Fees,” which establishes the authority for imposing and charging System Development Fees; and WHEREAS, LGI Homes is developing a 36-lot residential subdivision known as River’s Edge within the City of Riverbank; and
WHEREAS, the River’s Edge subdivision includes Lot A, consisting of approximately 21,471 square feet; and
WHEREAS, Lot A was originally intended to serve as a potential expansion area for the adjacent Diamond Bar East/Bruin Park drainage basin; and WHEREAS, after review of the basin’s performance, the City Engineer determined that Lot A is not needed for expansion of the drainage basin; and

CC/LRA – 06/09/2026
CC Resolution 2026-
WHEREAS, following that determination, LGI Homes offered to construct a dog park on Lot A as a public recreation amenity; and
WHEREAS, a dog park has been identified as one of the top requested park amenities from local residents through a Parks Department survey; and WHEREAS, the proposed dog park will include separate areas for small dogs and large dogs, an obstacle course, watering station, drinking fountain, waste station, gated secured entrance, seating and related park improvements; and WHEREAS, the City’s current Park System Development Fee is $5,617 per residential lot; and
WHEREAS, the River’s Edge subdivision includes 36 residential lots and the total Park System Development Fee obligation for the subdivision is $202,212; and WHEREAS, LGI Homes has requested a Park System Development Fee credit equal to $5,617 for each of the 36 residential lots, for a total Park System Development Fee credit of $202,212; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Park System Development Fee credit is limited to the Park System Development Fee obligation for the 36 residential lots within the River’s Edge subdivision; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Park System Development Fee credit shall be applied on a per-lot basis as each building permit is issued for the 36 residential lots within the River’s Edge subdivision; and
WHEREAS, each residential lot shall be eligible for a Park System Development Fee credit in the amount of $5,617, which is equal to the current Park System Development Fee for one residential lot; and
WHEREAS, no cash reimbursement, assignment of credits or credit above the total approved Park System Development Fee credit amount of $202,212 is authorized by this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, LGI Homes remains responsible for completing the dog park improvements on Lot A; and

CC/LRA – 06/09/2026
CC Resolution 2026-
WHEREAS, after completion of construction, the dog park improvements must be inspected by the City and accepted in accordance with City requirements; and WHEREAS, the approval of Park System Development Fee credits does not waive any applicable improvement, inspection, acceptance, warranty, bonding or maintenance obligation; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank hereby approves Park System Development Fee credits for LGI Homes in the total amount of $202,212 for construction of a dog park on Lot A within the River’s Edge subdivision.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that each of the 36 residential lots shall be eligible for one Park System Development Fee credit in the amount of $5,617.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank at a regular meeting held on the 9
th day of June, 2026; motioned by Councilmember ______, seconded by Councilmember ______, and upon roll call was carried by the following vote of ___:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_____________________________ __________________________ Gabriela Hernandez, CMC Rachel Hernandez
City Clerk Mayor

Item 10.5. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LRA BOARD
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.5.

SECTION : NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: 6/9/2026
Subject:

Resolution to Consider Approval of a Modification to Condition of Approval No. 9 for Vesting Tentative Map No. 01-2025 for the Meadowview Subdivision to Allow a Slope Easement in Lieu of a Block Retaining Wall Along the Rear Property Lines of Lots 18 through 31
From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Joshua Mann, Director of Community Development

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving a modification to Condition of Approval No. 9 for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01-2025 for the Meadowview Subdivision to allow a slope easement in lieu of a block retaining wall along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31, subject to compliance with City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901 and review and approval by the City Engineer.

SUMMARY
The Meadowview Subdivision was approved by the City Council on August 26, 2025. The approved project included Rezone No. 01-2025, Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01-2025 and Architecture and Site Plan Review No. 04-2025 to create thirty-one single-family residential lots and one dual-use stormwater basin on a 5.83± acre site at 4537 California Avenue.

The applicant is requesting to modify Condition of Approval No. 9. The current condition prohibits a slope easement along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31 and requires the applicant to construct a block retaining wall along the shared property boundary. The applicant is requesting to use a slope easement in lieu of the block retaining wall.

Planning staff discussed the request with the City Engineer. The City Engineer has no concerns with allowing the slope easement, provided the final grading and improvement plans comply with City standards. City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901 allows transition grading to be addressed through a retaining wall, slope transition or a combination of both, subject to City review and approval.

The requested modification does not change the approved subdivision layout, number of lots, density, architecture or circulation. The modification only changes how the grade transition along the rear of Lots 18 through 31 may be addressed.

Item 10.5. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
If Condition No. 9 did not expressly prohibit the slope easement, this request could have been reviewed administratively through the final grading and improvement plan process. Because the condition expressly prohibits the slope easement, City Council approval is required to modify the condition.

The Planning Commission considered this item at its May 19, 2026 meeting and unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2026-005 recommending City Council approval of the requested modification.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This item supports the City’s Strategic Plan by facilitating well-planned residential growth and allowing approved housing projects to proceed through the final engineering and improvement plan process. The requested condition modification does not change the approved residential use, number of lots or overall subdivision design.

BACKGROUND
The Meadowview project site is located at 4537 California Avenue, at the northwest corner of Snedigar Road and California Avenue. The City Council approved the project as a detached singlefamily residential subdivision with thirty-one lots and a dual-use stormwater basin.

As part of the original approval, Condition of Approval No. 9 was added to require a block retaining wall along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31. The purpose of the condition was to address grade differentials and ensure stability along the shared property boundary.

Condition of Approval No. 9 currently states:
“A slope easement shall not be permitted along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31. In lieu of the slope easement, the applicant shall construct a block retaining wall along the shared property boundary to retain grade differentials and ensure stability. The retaining wall shall be designed in accordance with applicable building codes and City standards, and shall be shown on the final grading and improvement plans, subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Building Official.”
After approval, the applicant requested that the City allow the grade transition to be addressed through a slope easement instead of a block retaining wall. Planning staff and the City Engineer reviewed the request. The City Engineer has no concerns with allowing the slope easement, subject to final grading and improvement plan review.

Because Condition No. 9 expressly states that a slope easement shall not be permitted, the condition must be modified by the City Council before staff can approve the requested alternative.

The Planning Commission reviewed the requested condition modification on May 19, 2026. After receiving the staff presentation and considering the item, the Planning Commission unanimously adopted Resolution No. 2026-005 recommending that the City Council approve the modification to Condition of Approval No. 9.

Item 10.5. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

ANALYSIS
The requested modification is narrow. It does not affect the approved land use, number of lots, density, circulation pattern, street layout, architecture or overall subdivision design. The request only affects the method used to address transition grading along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through

31. City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901 provides the City’s typical transition grading requirements. The standard allows transition grading to be addressed through retaining walls or slope transitions, depending on the elevation difference, site conditions and City approval. The detail also identifies that retaining walls and fences are subject to review and approval by Public Works and Community Development Departments.

Based on the City’s standard detail and the City Engineer’s review, a slope easement is an acceptable alternative in this location. The City Engineer has no concerns with allowing the slope easement, provided the final design complies with City standards and adequately addresses drainage, grade transition, slope stability and maintenance.

The current condition is more restrictive than the City’s standard detail. It removes administrative flexibility by prohibiting a slope easement entirely. The recommended modification restores that flexibility while preserving City Engineer review and approval.

Staff recommends that Condition of Approval No. 9 be modified as follows:
“The rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31 shall be designed to address grade differentials, drainage, slope stability and long-term maintenance to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.

Transition grading may be provided through a retaining wall, slope transition, slope easement or combination thereof, provided the design complies with City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901 (or other applicable city standards) and is approved by the City Engineer. If a slope easement is approved, the easement shall be shown on the Final Map or recorded by separate instrument, as determined by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. The easement shall include adequate rights and obligations for construction, access, inspection, maintenance, drainage, slope stability and protection of affected lots.” All other Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01-2025 would remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The requested condition modification does not change the approved subdivision density, land use, circulation, number of lots or residential design. The original project was determined to be exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 21159.21 for qualified housing projects.

The proposed modification is limited to transition grading along the rear of Lots 18 through 31. The modification allows the applicant to use a grading method allowed under City Standard Detail 901, subject to City Engineer approval. The modification does not create a new environmental impact and does not substantially increase the severity of any previously identified impact.

Item 10.5. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

FINANCIAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact to the City. The applicant remains responsible for preparing final grading and improvement plans, constructing required improvements and recording any required easements. City review and inspection costs are recovered through applicable development processing and inspection fees.

ATTACHMENTS

1. City Council Resolution 2026-

2. Planning Commission Resolution 2026-005

3. Planning Commission Staff Report

4. City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901

CC/LRA – 06/09/2026
CC Resolution 2026-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO CONDITION OF APPROVAL NO. 9 FOR VESTING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP NO. 01-2025, MEADOWVIEW, TO

ALLOW A SLOPE EASEMENT IN LIEU OF A BLOCK RETAINING WALL ALONG THE REAR PROPERTY LINES OF LOTS 18 THROUGH 31, LOCATED AT 4537 CALIFORNIA AVENUE, APN: 062-021-007

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CITY COUNCIL”) DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map Application No. 01-2025, Department File No. 25-0010, was submitted by Cary Pope to subdivide approximately

5.83± acres into thirty-one single-family residential lots located at 4537 California Avenue, APN 062-021-007; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01-2025 at a regular meeting held on June 17, 2025, in the manner prescribed by law and adopted Resolution No. 2025-010 recommending approval of Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01-2025 to the City Council, subject to Conditions of Approval; and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01- 2025 for the Meadowview Subdivision on August 26, 2025, subject to Conditions of Approval; and
WHEREAS, Condition of Approval No. 9 currently states that a slope easement shall not be permitted along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31 and requires the applicant to construct a block retaining wall along the shared property boundary to retain grade differentials and ensure stability; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has requested a modification to Condition of Approval No. 9 to allow a slope easement in lieu of the required block retaining wall along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31; and

CC/LRA – 06/09/2026
CC Resolution 2026-
WHEREAS, City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901, Typical Transition Grading Requirements, allows transition grading to be addressed through retaining walls, slope transitions or a combination thereof, subject to City review and approval; and WHEREAS, Planning staff discussed the requested modification with the City Engineer, and the City Engineer has no concerns with allowing the slope easement, provided the final grading and improvement plans comply with City standards and remain subject to City Engineer review and approval; and
WHEREAS, the requested modification does not change the approved land use, number of lots, density, circulation, subdivision layout or residential design; and WHEREAS, the requested modification is limited to the method used to address grade transition along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31; and WHEREAS, if Condition of Approval No. 9 did not expressly prohibit a slope easement, the requested grading treatment could have been reviewed administratively through the final grading and improvement plan review process; and WHEREAS, because Condition of Approval No. 9 expressly prohibits a slope easement, City Council approval is required to modify the condition before the alternative design may be approved through the final grading and improvement plan review process; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the requested condition modification at a duly noticed public hearing on May 19, 2026 and adopted Resolution No. 2026-005 recommending that the City Council approve the modification to Condition of Approval No. 9; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held a duly noticed public hearing on the requested modification to Condition of Approval No. 9; and
WHEREAS, the requested modification does not require additional environmental review because it does not change the approved subdivision density, land use, circulation, number of lots or residential design, and the original project was determined to be exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 21159.21, Exemption for Qualified Housing Projects; and

CC/LRA – 06/09/2026
CC Resolution 2026-
WHEREAS, all other Conditions of Approval for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01-2025 shall remain in full force and effect unless expressly modified by this Resolution; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank hereby finds as follows

1. The requested modification is consistent with the approved Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map because it does not alter the approved subdivision layout, number of lots, density, circulation or residential design.

2. The requested modification is consistent with City standards because City Standard Detail 901 allows transition grading to be addressed through a retaining wall, slope transition or combination thereof, subject to City review and approval.

3. The requested modification will continue to require City Engineer review and approval to ensure that the final design adequately addresses grade differentials, drainage, slope stability, maintenance and protection of affected lots.

4. The requested modification will not be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, comfort or general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood because the modification is limited to the method used to address transition grading along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31.

5. The requested modification does not create a new environmental impact and does not substantially increase the severity of any previously identified impact because it is limited to transition grading and does not change the approved residential subdivision, number of lots, land use, density, circulation or residential design.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank hereby approves the modification to Condition of Approval No. 9 for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01-2025 as follows:

Modified Condition of Approval No. 9
The rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31 shall be designed to address grade differentials, drainage, slope stability and long-term maintenance to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Transition grading may be provided through a retaining wall, slope transition, slope easement or combination thereof, provided the design complies with City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901 (or other applicable city standards) and is approved by the City Engineer. If a slope easement is approved, the easement shall be shown on the Final Map or recorded by separate instrument, as determined by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. The easement shall include adequate rights and obligations for construction, access, inspection, maintenance, drainage, slope stability and protection of affected lots.

CC/LRA – 06/09/2026
CC Resolution 2026-
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all other Conditions of Approval adopted for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01-2025 remain unchanged and in full force and effect.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank at a regular meeting held on the 9
th day of June, 2026; motioned by Councilmember ______, seconded by Councilmember ______, and upon roll call was carried by the following vote of ___:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
_____________________________ __________________________ Gabriela Hernandez, CMC Rachel Hernandez
City Clerk Mayor
Exhibit A: Modified Condition of Approval No. 9

EXHIBIT A
Condition of Approval No. 9 (per City Council Resolution No. 2025-093)

9. A slope easement shall not be permitted along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31. In lieu of the slope easement, the applicant shall construct a block retaining wall along the shared property boundary to retain grade differentials and ensure stability. The retaining wall shall be designed in accordance with applicable building codes and City standards, and shall be shown on the final grading and improvement plans, subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Building Official.

Modified Condition of Approval No. 9

9. The rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31 shall be designed to address grade differentials, drainage, slope stability and long-term maintenance to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Transition grading may be provided through a retaining wall, slope transition, slope easement or combination thereof, provided the design complies with City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901 (or other applicable city standards) and is approved by the City Engineer. If a slope easement is approved, the easement shall be shown on the Final Map or recorded by separate instrument, as determined by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. The easement shall include adequate rights and obligations for construction, access, inspection, maintenance, drainage, slope stability and protection of affected lots.

EXHIBIT A
Condition of Approval No. 9 (per City Council Resolution No. 2025-093)

9. A slope easement shall not be permitted along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31. In lieu of the slope easement, the applicant shall construct a block retaining wall along the shared property boundary to retain grade differentials and ensure stability. The retaining wall shall be designed in accordance with applicable building codes and City standards, and shall be shown on the final grading and improvement plans, subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer and Building Official.

Modified Condition of Approval No. 9

9. The rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31 shall be designed to address grade differentials, drainage, slope stability and long-term maintenance to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Transition grading may be provided through a retaining wall, slope transition, slope easement or combination thereof, provided the design complies with City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901 (or other applicable city standards) and is approved by the City Engineer. If a slope easement is approved, the easement shall be shown on the Final Map or recorded by separate instrument, as determined by the City Engineer and Community Development Director. The easement shall include adequate rights and obligations for construction, access, inspection, maintenance, drainage, slope stability and protection of affected lots.

Riverbank Planning Commission
Staff Report 3.3
Meeting of May 19, 2026

CITY OF RIVERBANK

PLANNING COMMISSION

STAFF REPORT
ITEM NO: 6.1 May 19, 2026
APPLICATION: Request to Recommend City Council Approval of a Modification to Condition of Approval No. 9 for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01-2025 for the Meadowview Subdivision to Allow a Slope Easement in Lieu of a Block Retaining Wall Along the Rear Property Lines of Lots 18 through 31, Located at 4537 California Avenue, APN 062-021- 007.

OWNER: Cary Pope
3237 Riverside Drive
Riverbank, CA 95367
APPLICANT: Cary Pope
3237 Riverside Drive
Riverbank, CA 95367
ENGINEER: Rick Mummert (Benchmark Engineering, Inc.)
4265 Spyres Way, Ste A
Modesto, CA 95356
LOCATION/APN: The proposed Project is located east of Claus Road, south of Patterson Road, west of Elanor Avenue, and north of Kentucky Avenue. The address is 4537 California Avenue APN: 062-021-007.

GENERAL PLAN: Medium-Density Residential (MDR)
ZONING: Single-Family Residential (SFR)

ENVIRONMENTAL
DETERMINATION:

Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project is exempt pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 21159.21 – Exemption for Qualified Housing Projects
PROJECT PLANNER: Joshua Mann, Director of Community Development RECOMMENDATION: Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-005 recommending to City Council the approval to modify Condition of Approval No. 9 for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01-2025 for the Meadowview Subdivision to allow a slope easement in lieu of a block retaining

Riverbank Planning Commission
Staff Report 3.3
Meeting of May 19, 2026

wall along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31, subject to compliance with City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Meadowview Subdivision was approved by the City Council on August 26, 2025. The approved project includes Rezone No. 01-2025, Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01-2025 and Architecture and Site Plan Review No. 04-2025 to create thirty-one singlefamily residential lots and one dual-use stormwater basin on a 5.83± acre site at 4537 California Avenue.

The applicant is requesting to modify Condition of Approval No. 9. The current condition prohibits a slope easement along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31 and requires the applicant to construct a block retaining wall along the shared property boundary. The applicant is requesting to use a slope easement in lieu of the block retaining wall.

Planning staff discussed the request with the City Engineer. The City Engineer has no concerns with allowing the slope easement, provided the final grading and improvement plans comply with City standards. City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901 allows transition grading to be addressed through a retaining wall, slope transition or a combination of both, subject to City review and approval.

The requested modification does not change the approved subdivision layout, number of lots, density, architecture or circulation. The modification only changes how the grade transition along the rear of Lots 18 through 31 may be addressed. If Condition No. 9 did not expressly prohibit the slope easement, this request could have been reviewed administratively through the final grading and improvement plan process.

BACKGROUND
The Meadowview project site is located at the northwest corner of Snedigar Road and California Avenue. The City Council approved the project as a compact detached singlefamily residential subdivision with thirty-one lots and a dual-use stormwater basin. The original staff report stated that a CMU block retaining wall would be required between Lots 18 through 31 and that the applicant had originally proposed a slope easement.

Condition of Approval No. 9 was added to require a block retaining wall along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31. The purpose of the condition was to address grade differentials and ensure stability along the shared property boundary.

Riverbank Planning Commission
Staff Report 3.3
Meeting of May 19, 2026

After approval, the applicant requested that the City allow the grade transition to be addressed through a slope easement instead of a block retaining wall. Planning staff and the City Engineer reviewed the request. The City Engineer has no concerns with allowing the slope easement, subject to final grading and improvement plan review.

Because Condition No. 9 expressly states that a slope easement shall not be permitted, the condition must be modified by the City Council before staff can approve the requested alternative.

PROJECT ANALYSIS
The requested modification is narrow. It does not affect the approved land use, number of lots, density, circulation pattern, street layout, architecture or overall subdivision design.

The request only affects the method used to address transition grading along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31.

City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901 provides the City’s typical transition grading requirements. The standard allows transition grading to be addressed through retaining walls or slope transitions, depending on the elevation difference, site conditions and City approval. The detail also identifies that retaining walls and fences are subject to review and approval by Public Works and Community Development.

Based on the City’s standard detail and the City Engineer’s review, a slope easement is an acceptable alternative in this location. The City Engineer has no concerns with allowing the slope easement, provided the final design complies with City standards and adequately addresses drainage, grade transition, slope stability and maintenance.

The current condition is more restrictive than the City’s standard detail. It removes administrative flexibility by prohibiting a slope easement entirely. The recommended modification restores that flexibility while preserving City Engineer review and approval.

REVISED CONDITION NO. 9 (per City Council Resolution No. 2025-093) Condition No. 9 is recommended to be amended as follows:

The rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31 shall be designed to address grade differentials, drainage, slope stability and long-term maintenance to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Transition grading may be provided through a retaining wall, slope transition, slope easement or combination thereof, provided the design complies with City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901 and is approved by the City Engineer. If a slope easement is approved, the easement shall be shown on the Final Map or recorded by separate instrument, as determined by the City Engineer and City Attorney. The easement shall include adequate rights and obligations for

Riverbank Planning Commission
Staff Report 3.3
Meeting of May 19, 2026

construction, access, inspection, maintenance, drainage, slope stability and protection of affected lots. Any retaining wall, if required, shall be designed in accordance with applicable building codes and City standards and shall be shown on the final grading and improvement plans, subject to review and approval by the City Engineer and Building Official.

ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
The requested condition modification does not change the approved subdivision density, land use, circulation, number of lots or residential design. The original project was determined to be exempt under CEQA Guidelines Section 21159.21 for qualified housing projects.

The proposed modification is limited to transition grading along the rear of Lots 18 through

31. The modification allows the applicant to use a grading method allowed under City Standard Detail 901, subject to City Engineer approval. The modification does not create a new environmental impact and does not substantially increase the severity of any previously identified impact.

PUBLIC NOTICE
On May 6, 2026, public notices for the Planning Commission hearing were mailed to all property owners within 300-feet of the project location. The Planning Commission hearing notice was published in the Riverbank News on May 6, 2026. The notice was posted on the City’s website and physically posted at City Hall North, South, the US Post Office and sent to the library on May 6, 2026.

RECOMMENDATION
Adoption of Resolution No. 2026-005 recommending to City Council the approval to modify Condition of Approval No. 9 for Vesting Tentative Subdivision Map No. 01-2025 for the Meadowview Subdivision to allow a slope easement in lieu of a block retaining wall along the rear property lines of Lots 18 through 31, subject to compliance with City of Riverbank Standard Detail 901.

ATTACHMENTS

1. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2026-005
Exhibit A – Meadowview (VTSM) Condition of Approval No. 9

Item 10.6. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LRA BOARD
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.6.

SECTION : NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: 6/9/2026
Subject: Resolution Approving the First Amendment to the Employment Agreements for Michael Patton, Director of Parks and Recreation and Joshua Mann, Director of Community Development
From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Marisela Garcia, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider adopting a Resolution approving the First Amendment to the Employment Agreements between the City of Riverbank and Michael Patton, Director of Parks and Recreation and Joshua Mann, Director of Community Development, consistent with the recommendations of the Classification and Compensation Study.

SUMMARY
On April 28, 2026 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-028 accepting and incorporating the recommendations of the City's Classification and Compensation Study prepared by Evergreen Solutions, LLC. The proposed First Amendment to the Employment Agreements with Michael Patton, Director of Parks and Recreation and Joshua Mann, Director of Community Development is intended to update the Agreement to reflect the new pay structure for these two positions consistent with the findings of the Classification and Compensation Study.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This item is directly associated with the City Council Goal of "Enhance City Facilities/Organization," which has a Strategy of "Establish hiring and staffing policies, including Classification and Compensation Study."

BACKGROUND
The Classification and Compensation Study identified opportunities to modernize the City’s compensation structure, improve internal equity, and align salary ranges more closely with the external market. This market analysis The market salary analysis compared Riverbank’s pay ranges to 19 peer public agencies, with cost-of-living adjustments applied.

At the 50th percentile market median, Riverbank’s Contract/Executive salary ranges were found to be below market at all points of the range, trailing peers on average by:
• 4.93% at the minimum;
• 5.68% at the midpoint; and
• 6.39% at the maximum.

Item 10.6. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
The study further noted that the compensation gap widens at the top of the range, in part because Riverbank’s salary range spread is narrower than that of peer agencies. The Contract/Executive and Miscellaneous employee groups lagged the market median to a greater extent than the MidManagement group.

A comparison of the updates to the Salary Ranges for the Director of Parks and Recreation and Director of Community Development are as follows:

Director of Parks and Recreation
Director of Community Development
Recommendation 4 of the Classification and Compensation Study recommended the utilization of a Consistent Step Methodology to adjust employee salaries within their new range. Under this method, employees generally retain their current step placement within the new pay grade, supporting continuity and internal equity. An exception is recommended for classifications, or individual employees, whose pay grades are realigned by more than 10% under the new structure. In this case, the City may modify this strategy to place employees at the closest step to their current salary within the new pay grade to avoid unintended advancement in level or compensation beyond the intended scope of the realignment. This exception applies to the Director of Community Development position as the new pay grade is realigned by 12.5%. Therefore, the proposed salary steps are as follows:

Position Current
Step
Proposed
Step
Director of Parks & Recreation C C
Director of Community Development D C

FINANCIAL IMPACT
Director of Parks and Recreation
The total financial impact of the increase to the Director of Parks and Recreation for the updated terms for Salary and Benefits for the 2025-26 Fiscal Year is $1,500 which is allocated from the

Item 10.6. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026
General Fund.

Director of Community Development
The total financial impact of the increase to the Director of Community Development for the updated terms for Salary and Benefits for the 2025-26 Fiscal Year is $5,766.67 which is allocated to the following funds:

General Fund: $2,883.33
Sewer Fund: $1,441.67
Water Fund: $1,441.67

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. Michael Patton_First Amendment to Employment Agreement

3. Joshua E Mann_First Amendment to Employment Agreement

CC/LRA – __/__/____
CC Resolution 2026-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK

APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

BETWEEN THE CITY OF RIVERBANK AND MICHAEL PATTON, DIRECTOR OF

PARKS AND RECREATION AND JOSHUA MANN, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY

DEVELOPMENT AND ADOPTING UPDATED SALARY SCHEDULES CONSISTENT

WITH THE CLASSIFICATION AND COMPENSATION STUDY

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CITY COUNCIL”) DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, on April 28, 2026 the City Council adopted a Resolution 2026-028 accepting and incorporating the recommendations of the Classification and Compensation Study prepared by Evergreen Solutions, LLC; and
WHEREAS, implementation of the study recommendations requires updates to salary schedules, classification structures, and compensation practices; and WHEREAS, the Michael Patton, Director of Parks and Recreation and Joshua Mann, Director of Community Development are unrepresented employees (“Employees”) who’s employment with the City is governed by an Employment Agreement (“Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the City Manager and the Employees have met and conferred in good faith regarding the implementation of the study recommendations and have reached agreement on amendments to their Agreements; and
WHEREAS, the Classification and Compensation Study has determined that the Salary Range for the Director of Parks and Recreation shall be Salary Range 307 as follows:

Steps A B C D E
Annual
Salary
$145,344.38 $152,611.60 $160,242.18 $168,254.29 $176,667.00 WHEREAS, the Classification and Compensation Study has determined that the Salary Range for the Director of Community Development shall be Salary Range 311 as follows:

Steps A B C D E
Annual
Salary
$106,433.00 $168,454.65 $176,877.38 $185,721.25 $195,007.31

CC/LRA – __/__/____
CC Resolution 2026-

WHEREAS, the agreed-upon changes include updated salary schedules, classification assignments, and related compensation provisions consistent with the study and the City’s adopted compensation framework.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank does hereby:

1. Approval of the First Amendment
The City Council hereby approves the First Amendment to the Employment Agreements between the City of Riverbank and Michael Patton, Director of Parks and Recreation (Exhibit A), and Joshua E. Mann, Director of Community Development (Exhibit B).

2. Adoption of Salary Schedule
The updated salary schedule for the Director of Parks and Recreation and Director of Community Development is hereby approved and adopted.

3. Classification and Compensation Implementation
The updated classifications, pay grade assignments, and compensation adjustments identified in the study and reflected in the Amendment 1 are hereby approved.

4. Effective Date
The approved salary schedules and compensation adjustments shall become effective February 6, 2026.

5. Authorization
The City Manager is authorized to execute the First Amendment to the Employment Agreements and implement the provisions of this Resolution.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of June, 2026; motioned by Councilmember __________, seconded by Councilmember __________, and upon roll call was carried by the following City Council vote of ______:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

CC/LRA – __/__/____
CC Resolution 2026-

ATTEST: APPROVED:
________________________________ __________________________ Gabriela Hernandez, CMC Rachel Hernandez
City Clerk Mayor
Attachment: Exhibit A – FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RIVERBANK AND MICHAEL PATTON, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION.

Exhibit B – FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF RIVERBANK AND JOSHUA E. MANN, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT.

City of Riverbank
Director of Parks and Recreation
First Amendment to Employment Agreement

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK AND MICHAEL PATTON
This First Amendment to the Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of the _____ day of June, 2026, by and between the City of Riverbank, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and Michael Patton, an individual (“Employee”). The City and Employee may individually be referred to herein as “Party” or collectively as “Parties.” There are no other parties to the Agreement.

RECITALS

1. On December 4, 2023, Employee was appointed as the Director of Parks and Recreation for the City.

2. On April 28, 2026, the Riverbank City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-028 accepting and incorporating the recommendations of the City of Riverbank Classification and Compensation Study prepared by Evergreen Solutions, LLC.

3. The Classification and Compensation Study recommended revisions to the salary ranges to various City classifications, including the Director of Parks and Recreation position.

4. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2026-028, the salary range for the Director of Parks and Recreation was revised and established as Salary Range 307.

5. The Parties desire to amend the Agreement to adjust Employee’s salary consistent with Salary Range 307.

6. The First Amendment shall be effective retroactively to February 6, 2026.

NOW, THEREFORE, Section 5 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

Section 5. Compensation and Evaluations.

Section 5.1. Base Salary. Employee’s annual salary as of the Effective Date of this Agreement is set at Step C of Salary Range 253, in the amount of One Hundred Fifty-Seven Thousand One Hundred Eighty-Eight and 81/100’s Dollars ($157,188.81) (“Base Salary”).

Effective as of the pay period beginning February 6, 2026, Employee’s Base Salary shall be set at Step C of Salary Range 307, in the amount of One Hundred Sixty Thousand Two Hundred FortyTwo and 18/100’s Dollars ($160,242.18). Salary reviews shall occur annually in accordance with Section 5.3 of this Agreement. Employee shall be eligible for an annual step increase upon receipt of a performance evaluation of at least “Satisfactory.”

City of Riverbank
Director of Parks and Recreation
First Amendment to Employment Agreement

Entire Agreement; No Other Amendments
This First Amendment constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with respect to the subject matter herein addressed. Except as expressly amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this First Amendment to the Employment Agreement as of the date of the Agreement set forth above.

CITY:

City of Riverbank, a municipal corporation
of the State of California
By:

Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Date Signed:

EMPLOYEE:

Michael Patton, an individual
By:__________________________
Michael Patton
Date Signed: ________________________
By:

Gabriela Hernandez, City Clerk
Date Signed:

Approved as to Form and Content:

By:

Thomas P. Hallinan, City Attorney

City of Riverbank
Director of Community Development
First Amendment to Employment Agreement

FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF RIVERBANK AND JOSHUA E. MANN
This First Amendment to the Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of the _____ day of June, 2026, by and between the City of Riverbank, a California municipal corporation (“City”), and Joshua E. Mann, an individual (“Employee”). The City and Employee may individually be referred to herein as “Party” or collectively as “Parties.” There are no other parties to the Agreement.

RECITALS

1. On May 6, 2024, Employee was appointed as the Director of Community Development for the City.

2. On April 28, 2026, the Riverbank City Council adopted Resolution No. 2026-028 accepting and incorporating the recommendations of the City of Riverbank Classification and Compensation Study prepared by Evergreen Solutions, LLC.

3. The Classification and Compensation Study recommended revisions to the salary ranges to various City classifications, including the Director of Community Development position.

4. Pursuant to Resolution No. 2026-028, the salary range for the Director of Community Development was revised and established as Salary Range 311.

5. The Parties desire to amend the Agreement to adjust Employee’s salary consistent with Salary Range 311.

6. Employee’s placement at Step C of Salary Range 311 is based solely on the City’s implementation of the 2025-2026 Classification and Compensation Study and shall not be deemed or construed as a demotion, reduction in status, waiver of rights, or adverse employment action.

7. This First Amendment shall be effective retroactively to February 6, 2026.

NOW, THEREFORE, Section 5 of the Employment Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:

Section 5. Compensation and Evaluations.

Section 5.1. Base Salary. Employee’s annual salary as of the Effective Date of this Agreement is set at Step D of Salary Range 253, in the amount of One Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand Forty-Eight and 25/100’s Dollars ($165,048.25) (“Base Salary”). Effective as of the pay period beginning February 6, 2026, Employee’s Base Salary shall be set at Step C of Salary Range

City of Riverbank
Director of Community Development
First Amendment to Employment Agreement

311, in the amount of One Hundred Seventy-Six Thousand Eight Hundred Seventy-Seven and 38/100’s Dollars ($176,877.38). Employee’s Base Salary shall be payable in installments at the same time and in the same manner as other similarly situated City employees. Salary reviews shall occur annually in accordance with Section 5.3 of this Agreement. Employee shall be eligible for an annual step increase upon receipt of a performance evaluation of at least “Satisfactory.” Entire Agreement; No Other Amendments
This First Amendment constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter herein addressed. Except as expressly amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment to the Employment Agreement has been entered into by and between EMPLOYEE and CITY as of the date of the Agreement set forth above.

CITY:

City of Riverbank, a municipal corporation
of the State of California
By:

Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Date Signed:

EMPLOYEE:

Joshua E. Mann, an individual
By:__________________________
Joshua E. Mann
Date Signed: ________________________
By:

Gabriela Hernandez, City Clerk
Date Signed:

Approved as to Form and Content:

By:

Thomas P. Hallinan, City Attorney

Item 10.7. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LRA BOARD
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.7.

SECTION : NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: 6/9/2026
Subject: Resolution Approving an Employment Agreement Between the City of Riverbank and Cody Bridgewater, Director of Public Works/Interim Local Redevelopment Agency Director and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement
From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Marisela Garcia, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider adopting a Resolution which will approve an Employment Agreement with Cody Bridgewater, Director of Public Works/Interim LRA Director.

SUMMARY
Mr. Bridgewater's current contract expired December 1, 2025. Negotiation of a new contract was pending the conclusion of the Classification and Compensation Study. The proposed contract would be effective June 9, 2026. However, the salary adjustment as a result of the recommendations implemented from the Classification and Compensation Study will be effective as of February 6, 2026.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This item, while not directly related to the City Council’s Strategic Plan Goals, does allow for the City to continue working towards achieving said goals.

BACKGROUND
After the retirement of the previous Public Works Director and a successful executive-level recruitment by Mosaic Public Partners in 2022, Mr. Bridgewater was selected as the new Director of Public Works/ effective December 2, 2022. Mr. Bridgewater's previously served in other local jurisdictions such as the City of Oakdale, and the Sanitary Sewer Districts for Jamestown and Salida. His skill set has proven to be valuable in this position.

Mr. Bridgewater's contract expired on December 1, 2025. Pending the conclusion of the Classification and Compensation Study, negotiations for a new contract began shortly after the recommendations from Evergreen Consulting, LLC. were received. The proposed terms of this contract were a result of the negotiations between the City Council and Mr. Bridgewater.

TERMS
Mr. Bridgewater’s proposed contract contains the following terms:

Item 10.7. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

1. Effective Date: As of June 9, 2026.

2. Term: Three (3) years from the Effective Date.

3. Base Salary: Effective December 2, 2025 salary is $165,048.25 or Step D of the Director of Public Works, Salary Range 253:

Step
Range 258

A B C D E
Annual
Salary
$142,574.88 $149,703.62 $157,188.81 $165,048.25 $173,300.66 Effective February 6, 2026 salary shall be set at $185,721.25 or Step D of the new Director of Public Works Salary Range 311 as approved in the Classification and Compensation Study:

Step
Range 311

A B C D E
Annual
Salary
$160,433.00 $168,454.65 $176,877.38 $185,721.25 $195,007.31 Employee receives an additional 7% increase to his base salary to compensate him for his out of class work as Interim RLRA Director. Once the duties of the Interim RLRA Director cease, Employee shall no longer receive the additional 7%.

4. Cost of Living Adjustments: During the term of the Agreement, City agrees to adjust the base salary as follows:
a. Effective the first full pay period in July 2026, the base salary shall be increased to reflect a four percent (4%) cost of living adjustment (COLA). b. Effective the first full pay period of July 2027 the base salary shall be increased to reflect a four percent (4%) cost of living adjustment (COLA). c. Effective the first full pay period of July 2028, the base salary shall be increased to reflect a three percent (3%) cost of living adjustment (COLA).

5. Review and Evaluation: To be conducted in December of each year.

6. Healthcare Benefits: Employee to receive the same health care benefits as provided to the LiUNA Bargaining Unit.

7. Life Insurance: $50,000

8. Deferred Compensation: City to match employee’s contribution up to 2% of gross pay per pay period. City to contribute towards the Union Pension Retirement Fund at the rate currently established for the City.

9. Retirement: City to pay employer costs of participation in CalPERS Retirement System.

Employee is enrolled in the 2% @ 60 Classic Plan. Employee responsible for the 7% employee contribution.

10. Vacation: Employee shall be entitled to 20 days of vacation and may not accumulate more than 400 hours of leave.

Item 10.7. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

11. Sick Leave: Employee shall earn sick leave at the rate of 1 working day for each month of service.

12. Holidays: Employee shall be entitled to observe, with pay, 13 observed holidays, and 3 floating holidays.

13. Executive Leave: Employee shall receive 80 hours of executive leave at the beginning of each fiscal year which may be cashed out if not used. Any unused leave expires on June 30 of each fiscal year.

14. City Vehicle: Employee may have use of a City vehicle for travel on all City-related business, including to and from work.

15. Professional and Educational Development: City will budget for reasonable costs of travel and business expenses for professional development and pay employees’ annual membership dues to professional organizations.

16. Longevity: Upon eligibility based on employee’s tenure with the city, employee will become eligible for longevity pay as follows:

Years of Service Longevity Pay Rate
10 but less than 13 2.5% of Base Salary
13 but less than 20 additional 2.5% of Base Salary (total 5%) 20+ additional 2.5% of Base Salary (total 7.5%)

FINANCIAL IMPACT
The total financial impact to the City for the updated terms for Salary and Benefits for the 2025-26 Fiscal Year is $10,633.33 which is allocated to the following funds:

General Fund: $850.67
Sewer Fund: $4,891.33
Water Fund: $4,891.33

ATTACHMENTS

1. Resolution

2. C. Bridgewater-2026 Employment Agreement

CC/LRA – __/__/____
CC Resolution 2026-

CITY OF RIVERBANK
RESOLUTION 2026-

A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RIVERBANK,

CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE AN EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE

CITY OF RIVERBANK AND CODY BRIDGEWATER AS DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC

WORKS/INTERIM RIVERBANK LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DIRECTOR

AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT

THE CITY OF RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL (HEREAFTER REFERRED TO AS THE “CITY COUNCIL”) DOES HEREBY RESOLVE THAT:

WHEREAS, Mr. Bridgewater was appointed to the position of Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Executive Director effective December 2, 2022; and WHEREAS, Mr. Bridgewater has successfully performed the duties of Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Executive Director since his employment began; and WHEREAS, based on his experience in the Public Works field the City Manager desires to continue Mr. Bridgewater’s appointment to said position; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Mr. Bridgewater have negotiated a new Employment Agreement, herein incorporated as Exhibit A, with the City of Riverbank; and WHEREAS, Mr. Bridgewater’s new contract will be effective June 9, 2026 for a three year term, and
WHEREAS, Mr. Bridgewater will be eligible for an adjustment to his salary to Step D of Salary Range 311 based on the recommendations of the Classification and Compensation effective February 6, 2026; and
WHEREAS, the salary range for the Director of Public Works/Interim Riverbank Local Redevelopment Agency Director is set as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank does hereby approve the Employment Agreement between the City of Riverbank and Mr. Cody Bridgewater as Director of Public Works/Interim Riverbank Local Redevelopment Agency Director.

CC/LRA – __/__/____
CC Resolution 2026-

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Riverbank does hereby authorize the City Manager to execute said Agreement PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Riverbank at a regular meeting held on the 9th day of June, 2026; motioned by Councilmember __________, seconded by Councilmember __________, and upon roll call was carried by the following City Council vote of ______:

AYES:

NAYS:

ABSENT:

ABSTAINED:

ATTEST: APPROVED:
________________________________ __________________________ Gabriela Hernandez, CMC Rachel Hernandez
City Clerk Mayor
Attachment(s): Employment Agreement – Cody Bridgewater

City of Riverbank
Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director
Employment Agreement

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this _____ day of June 2026, by and between the City of Riverbank, a municipal corporation (“City”), and Cody Bridgewater, an individual (“Employee”). The City and Employee may individually be referred to herein as “Party” or collectively as “Parties”.

There are no other parties to this Agreement.

RECITALS
A. The City Manager is authorized to appoint City staff pursuant to the City Code of Riverbank (“City Code”) section 31.03(H)(12).

B. The City desires to employ the services of Employee on the terms and conditions set forth herein as Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director.

C. The Director of Public Works plans, manages, oversees, and directs the operations and services the Public Works Department, which includes the Streets, Storm Drain, Sewer, Water, Wastewater, and Fleet Services Divisions; coordinates activities with other City officials, departments, outside agencies, contractors, organizations, and the public; provides responsible and complex staff support to the City Council, City Manager, and Assistant City Manager; performs other related duties as assigned.

D. The Interim RLRA Director plans, organizes, coordinates, and performs management level economic development and redevelopment activities associated with the conveyance and reuse of the Riverbank Army Ammunition Plant to include capital improvements and leasing of industrial and commercial space, commercial business attraction and retention public improvement projects; performs complex work in coordinating economic development financing and strategic programs associated with reuse and redevelopment of Base Closure and Realignment (“BRAC”) projects; staff to Local Redevelopment Authority members; performs other related duties as required.

E. The Parties agree that this Agreement shall be the sole agreement between the Parties regarding the employment of Employee as Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director.

F. The Parties desire to execute this Agreement pursuant to the authority of and subject to the provisions of California Government Code (“Government Code”) section 53260 et seq.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants entered into between the Parties and in consideration of the benefits that accrue to each, it is agreed as follows:

City of Riverbank
Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director
Employment Agreement

AGREEMENT
Section 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above (“Recitals”) are incorporated herein by this reference and made a part of this Agreement. In the event of any inconsistencies between the Recitals and Sections 1 through 10 of this Agreement, Sections 1 through 10 will prevail.

Section 2. Effective Date. This Agreement shall be effective as of June 9, 2026 (“Effective Date”).

Section 3. Appointment of Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director, Duties, and Term.

Section 3.1. Appointment of Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director. Employee shall serve as the Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director of the City, and shall be vested with the powers, duties, and responsibilities set forth in City Code, California law, ordinances, and resolutions, and such other duties and functions as the City Manager may from time-to-time assign.

Section 3.2. No Secondary Employment. Employee further agrees that Employee shall devote Employee’s productive time, abilities, and attention as necessary to the full accomplishment of his duties and the City’s business needs. Accordingly, Employee shall not hold secondary employment or engage in activities which conflict with, or present the appearance or possibility of conflicting with, City’s legitimate business interests. As such, Employee agrees that Employee will notify the City Manager in writing if Employee wishes to accept secondary employment sufficiently in advance to allow the City Manager to determine whether there is the appearance of, or an actual conflict or potential conflict with the satisfactory performance of Employee’s duties and/or the best interest of the City.

Should the City Manager make such a determination, Employee agrees that Employee will forgo the proposed secondary employment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Employee has the right to volunteer for such nonprofit organizations as he may see fit and further provided that such volunteer services shall not interfere with his duties as Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director.

Section 3.3. Exempt Employee. The general business hours for City employees are Monday through Friday, 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. However, it is recognized by the Parties that Employee is an exempt employee for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq.). Employee shall not receive overtime or extra compensation for hours worked outside of the City’s general business hours, which are necessary to fulfill the duties of the Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director position, unless otherwise provided in this Agreement.

Section 3.4. Schedule. The Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director daily and weekly work schedule shall vary in accordance with the work required to be performed.

The Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director position may include frequent attendance at evening meetings and frequent irregular hours as necessary to meet deadlines

City of Riverbank
Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director
Employment Agreement

and achieve objectives. The City Council and the City Manager recognize that the Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director must devote a great deal of his time outside normal office hours to business of the City and, to that end, will be allowed to take Executive Leave, as defined in Section 5.11 of this Agreement, as he shall deem appropriate during said normal office hours.

Section 3.5. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for three (3) years from the Effective Date. No later than three (3) months prior to the expiration of the Term, the City Manager will provide written notice to Employee as to whether the City Manager intents to extend the Term. Termination of this Agreement prior to the expiration of the Term shall be in accordance with Section 6 below.

Section 4. At-Will Employment. Employee is an at-will employee serving at the pleasure of the City Council and City Manager, as provided in Government Code section 36506 and City Code section 31.01. Accordingly, the City Manager may terminate Employee’s employment at any time, with or without cause. Only if Employee is terminated by the City without Good Cause, as defined in Section 6.3 of this Agreement, shall Employee be entitled to a Severance, as defined in Section 6.3 of this Agreement.

Section 5. Compensation and Evaluations.

Section 5.1. Base Salary. Employee’s annual salary as of February 6, 2026 is set at Step D of Salary Range 311, in the amount of One Hundred Eighty-Five Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty-One and 25/100’s Dollars ($185,721.25). Employee’s Base Salary shall be payable in installments at the same time that the other similarly situated City employees are paid. Salary reviews shall occur annually in accordance with Section 5.3 of this Agreement. Employee shall receive a step increase annually upon receiving a performance evaluation of at least “Satisfactory”.

Employee shall receive an additional 7% increase to his Base Salary in order to compensate him for his out of class work as Interim RLRA Director. Once the duties of Interim RLRA Director ceases, at the sole discretion of the City Manager, Employee shall no longer receive the additional 7% increase to his Base Salary. This change will be effective the first full pay period after his duties of Interim RLRA Director ceases.

During the term of this agreement the City agrees to adjust the base salary as follows:

1. Effective the first full pay period in July 2026, the base salary shall be increased to reflect a four percent (4%) cost of living adjustment (COLA).

2. Effective the first full pay period of July 2027 the base salary shall be increased to reflect a four percent (4%) cost of living adjustment (COLA).

3. Effective the first full pay period of July 2028, the base salary shall be increased to reflect a three percent (3%) cost of living adjustment (COLA).

City of Riverbank
Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director
Employment Agreement

Section 5.2. Pro-rata Decrease. Employee acknowledges that the Base Salary may be subject to a pro-rata decrease based on the City Council’s adoption of an unpaid Mandatory Furlough Program adopted as a budgetary measure.

Section 5.3. Review and Evaluation. The City Manager agrees to review and evaluate Employee’s performance of his duties as Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement (“Review and Evaluation”), on not less than an annual basis and to provide Employee with a written performance review. The annual Review and Evaluation shall be conducted in December of each year, or at the City Manager’s discretion.

Section 5.4. Healthcare Benefits. Employee shall receive the same healthcare benefits as provided to LIUNA, under section 7.01 of its Memorandum of Understanding, as that provision may be amended, superseded, or renumbered in any current or successor Memorandum of Understanding during the Term of this Agreement.

Section 5.5. Life Insurance. City will provide Employee with life insurance in the amount of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000).

Section 5.6. Deferred Compensation. City shall establish and maintain a deferred compensation plan and match Employee’s contribution to the deferred compensation plan in an amount not to exceed two percent (2%) of gross pay each pay period. City will also contribute to the Union Pension Retirement Fund at the rate of one hundred and seventythree (173) hours worked time multiplied by the negotiated rate for any given year each month (e.g. 173 x .93 = $160.89). Employee shall receive any adjustment to this program granted to all other Department Heads.

Section 5.7. Retirement. City shall pay the employer cost of participation in the California Public Employees Retirement System (“CalPERS”). Employee will be enrolled in the CalPERS 2% @ 60 Classic plan. Employee shall pay the seven percent (7%) employee contribution.

Section 5.8. Vacation. Employee shall be entitled to twenty (20) days of vacation annually (or 160 hours). Employee may not accumulate more than four hundred hours (400) of vacation leave.

Section 5.9. Sick Leave. Employee shall earn sick leave at the rate of one (1) working day for each month of service.

Section 5.10. Holidays. Employee shall be entitled to observe, with pay, the thirteen (13) observed holidays, and three (3) floating holidays as outlined in the City’s Personnel Rules.

Section 5.11. Executive Leave. It is recognized that Employee must devote a great deal of time outside the normal office hours to City business. To that end, Employee shall receive 10 days (eighty (80) hours) of executive leave (“Executive Leave”) at the beginning

City of Riverbank
Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director
Employment Agreement

of each fiscal year, which may be cashed out if not used. Any unused Executive Leave expires on June 30 of each fiscal year.

Section 5.12. City Vehicle. Employee may have the use of a City vehicle for travel on all City-related business. This includes use of the City vehicle for travel by Employee to and from work.

Section 5.13. Professional and Educational Development. City agrees to budget for reasonable costs of travel and business expenses for Employee to attend professional and official travel, meetings, and occasions adequate to continue the professional development of Employee and to adequately pursue necessary official and other functions for the City, including, but not limited to, annual conferences of the League of California Cities, and such other regional and local government groups and committees thereof on which Employee serves as a member, provided such travel and business expenses are included within the annual budget. City agrees to pay Employee’s annual membership dues to professional organizations that benefit the Employee and the City as designated and approved in the final budget.

Section 5.14. Longevity Benefits. Upon eligibility based on Employee’s tenure with the City, he will receive a longevity benefit of two and a half percent (2.5%) of his Base Salary after ten (10) years of service, which will increase to five percent (5%) of his Base Salary after thirteen (13) years of service, and increase to seven and one-half percent (7.5%) of his Base Salary after twenty (20) years of service, paid bi-weekly with his Base Salary.

Section 6. Termination of Employment and Severance.

Section 6.1 Voluntary Resignation. Employee may resign at any time and agrees to give the City at least thirty (30) days advance written notice of the effective date of Employee’s resignation, unless the Parties otherwise agree in writing. If Employee retires from full time public service with the City, Employee shall provide three (3) months advance written notice. Employee’s actual retirement date will be mutually established between the Parties. During the notice period, all rights and obligations of the Parties under this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. Promptly after the effective date of resignation, the City shall pay to Employee all salary and benefit amounts, both accrued and owing, under this Agreement. However, in the event of voluntary resignation, Employee shall not be entitled to Severance, as set forth in Section 6.3 of this Agreement.

Section 6.2. Termination by City Manager. The City Manager may terminate this Agreement and remove Employee from his position as Director of Public Works/ Interim RLRA Director at any time with or without cause and with or without notice.

Within ten (10) days of City Manager’s termination of this Agreement, Employee may make a written request for a hearing before the City Council, at which time the City Council will have the option to uphold the City Manager’s termination decision. In the event Employee does not request a hearing before the City Council within ten (10) days, the City Manager’s termination decision will stand. If Employee does make a request for a hearing

City of Riverbank
Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director
Employment Agreement

within ten (10) days, the hearing shall take place in closed session at a regularly scheduled City Council meeting. Upon Employee’s request for the hearing to take place in open session, he will waive any claims to privacy associated with his rights to employment information that is the basis for his termination, including, but not limited to, his personnel file and any information contained therein, which would otherwise be private.

The City Manager may, at any time, relieve Employee of his Interim RLRA Director responsibilities and the associated compensation without terminating this Agreement or Employee’s position as Director of Public Works. Such action shall not constitute a termination under this Agreement and shall not entitle Employee to a hearing, Severance, or any other separation benefit.

Section 6.3. Termination Without Good Cause. In the event the City terminates this Agreement without Good Cause, as defined in Section 6.4 below, the City shall pay Employee a sum equal to four (4) months Base Salary (“Severance”). This Severance is subject to the restrictions of Government Code section 53260, and in no event shall severance exceed the lesser of four (4) months of Base Salary or (ii) the compensation remaining under the Term of this Agreement. Any cash settlement related to the termination of this Agreement received by Employee from the City shall be fully reimbursed to the City if Employee is convicted of a crime involving an abuse of his office or position while employed with the City, pursuant to Government Code section 53243.2.

In the event the City terminates this Agreement, Employee shall be entitled to continued medical and dental benefits at his cost pursuant to the provisions of the federal Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (“COBRA”).

Section 6.4. Termination For Good Cause. The City may at any time immediately terminate this Agreement for Good Cause, as defined below. If Employee is terminated for Good Cause, the City shall not be required to pay any Severance under this Agreement, and the City shall have no obligation to Employee beyond those benefits accrued as of Employee’s last day of employment and those the City is obligated to provide under federal or state law.
“Good Cause” for purposes of this Agreement, means a fair and honest cause or reason for termination. These reasons include, but are not limited to:

1. Conviction of a felony;

2. Disclosing confidential information of City;

3. Gross carelessness or misconduct;

4. Unjustifiable and willful neglect of the duties described in this Agreement;

5. Mismanagement;

City of Riverbank
Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director
Employment Agreement

6. Non-performance of duties;

7. Any conduct which violates the City’s Personnel Rules and for which a City employee may be terminated;

8. Repeated and protracted unexcused absences from the Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Directors’ office and duties;

9. Willful destruction or misuse of City property;

10. Conduct that in any way has a direct, substantial, and adverse effect on the City’s reputation;

11. Willful violation of federal, state or City discrimination laws;

12. Continued substance abuse which adversely affects performance of Employee’s duties as the Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director;

13. Refusal to take or subscribe any oath or affirmation which is required by law; or

14. Employee’s disability resulting in Employee’s inability to perform the essential functions of the job, which the City is unable to reasonably accommodate without placing an undue burden on City business operations.

Notwithstanding any provision in this Agreement to the contrary, the City Manager may suspend Employee with full pay and benefits at any time during the Term of this Agreement.

Section 7. Indemnification. The City shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify Employee against any tort, personnel, civil rights, or professional liability claim or demand or other legal action, whether groundless or otherwise, arising out of an alleged act or omission occurring in the performance of Employee’s duties as Director of Public Works and/or Interim RLRA Director in accordance with California’s Tort Claims Act (Government Code section 825 et seq.), and shall provide a defense to Employee in accordance with Government Code sections 995-996.5. The City may decline to defend or indemnify Employee only as permitted by the Government Code. The City may compromise and settle any such claim or suit and pay the amount of any resulting settlement or judgment; provided, however, that the City’s duty to defend and indemnify shall be contingent upon Employee’s good faith cooperation with such defense. In the event the City provides funds for legal criminal defense pursuant to this Section, Employee shall reimburse the City for such legal criminal defense funds if Employee is convicted of a crime involving an abuse of office or position, as provided by Government Code sections 53243-53243.4.

City of Riverbank
Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director
Employment Agreement

Section 8. Bonding. City shall bear the full cost of any fidelity or other bonds required of Employee under any law or ordinance.

Section 9. Notices. Any notice or communication required hereunder between the City and Employee must be in writing and may be given either personally, by facsimile (with original forwarded by regular U.S. Mail), by registered or certified mail (return receipt requested), or by Federal Express, UPS, or other similar couriers providing overnight delivery. If personally delivered, a notice shall be deemed to have been given when delivered to the Party to whom it is addressed. If given by facsimile transmission, a notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given and received upon actual physical receipt of the entire document by the receiving Party’s facsimile machine. Notices transmitted by facsimile after 5:00 p.m. on a normal business day, or on a Saturday, Sunday or holiday shall be deemed to have been given and received on the next normal business day. If given by registered or certified mail, such notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given and received on the first to occur of (a) actual receipt by any of the addressees designated below as the Party to whom notices are to be sent, or (b) five (5) days after a registered or certified letter containing such notice, properly addressed, with postage prepaid, is deposited in the United States mail. If given by Federal Express or similar courier, a notice or communication shall be deemed to have been given and received on the date delivered, as shown on a receipt issued by the courier. Any Party hereto may at any time, by giving ten (10) days written notice to the other Party hereto, designate any other address in substitution of the address to which such notice or communication shall be given. Such notices or communications shall be given to the Parties at their addresses set forth below:

If to City: City of Riverbank
Attn: City Clerk
6707 Third Street
Riverbank, CA 95367

and White Brenner, LLP
Attn: Thomas P. Hallinan
1608 T Street
Sacramento, CA 95811
If to Employee: City of Riverbank
Attn: Cody Bridgewater
6707 Third Street
Riverbank, CA 95367
w/cc: home address on file
Section 10. General Provisions.

10.1. Modification of Agreement. This Agreement may be supplemented, amended, or modified only by a writing signed by the City and Employee.

City of Riverbank
Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director
Employment Agreement

10.2. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the final, complete, and exclusive statement of the terms of the agreement between the Parties and supersedes all other prior or contemporaneous oral or written understandings and agreements of the Parties. No Party has been induced to enter into this Agreement by, nor is any Party relying on, any representation or warranty except those expressly set forth in this Agreement.

10.3. Severability of Agreement. If a court or an arbitrator of competent jurisdiction holds any section of this Agreement to be illegal, unenforceable, or invalid for any reason, the validity and enforceability of the remaining sections of this Agreement shall not be affected.

10.4. Authority. All Parties to this Agreement warrant and represent that they have the power and authority to enter into this Agreement and the names, titles, and capacities herein stated on behalf of any entities, persons, states, or firms represented or purported to be represented by such entities, persons, states, or firms and that all former requirements necessary or required by state or federal law in order to enter into this Agreement had been fully complied with. Further, by entering into this Agreement, neither Party hereto shall have breached the terms or conditions of any other contract or agreement to which such Party is obligated, which such breach would have a material effect hereon.

10.5. Headings. The headings in this Agreement are included for convenience only and neither affect the construction or interpretation of any section in this Agreement nor affect any of the rights or obligations of the Parties to this Agreement.

10.6. Necessary Acts and Further Assurances. The Parties shall, at their own cost and expense, execute and deliver such further documents and instruments and shall take such other actions as may be reasonably required or appropriate to evidence or carry out the intent and purposes of this Agreement.

10.7. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California.

10.8. Waiver. No covenant, term, or condition, or the breach thereof, shall be deemed waived, except by written consent of the Party against whom the waiver is claimed and any waiver of the breach of any covenant, term, or condition shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding or succeeding breach of the same or any other covenant, term, or condition.

10.9. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, and all so executed shall constitute an agreement which shall be binding upon the Parties hereto, notwithstanding that the signatures of all Parties and Parties’ designated representatives do not appear on the same page.

10.10. Venue. Venue for all legal proceedings shall be in the Superior Court in and for the County of Stanislaus in the State of California.

City of Riverbank
Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director
Employment Agreement

10.11. Attorney’s Fees and Costs. If any action at law or in equity, including action for declaratory relief, is brought to enforce or interpret sections of this Agreement, the prevailing Party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's fees and costs, which may be set by the court in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose, in addition to any other relief to which such Party may be entitled. [SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]

City of Riverbank
Director of Public Works/Interim RLRA Director
Employment Agreement

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been entered into by and between EMPLOYEE and CITY as of the date of the Agreement set forth above.

CITY:

City of Riverbank, a municipal corporation
of the State of California
By:

Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Date Signed:

EMPLOYEE:

By:

Cody Bridgewater, an individual
Date Signed: ______________________
By:

Gabriela Hernandez, City Clerk
Date Signed:

Approved as to Form and Content:

By:

Thomas P. Hallinan, City Attorney

Item 10.8. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

RIVERBANK CITY COUNCIL / LRA BOARD
AGENDA ITEM NO. 10.8.

SECTION : NEW BUSINESS
Meeting Date: 6/9/2026
Subject: Resolution Approving an Employment Agreement Between the City of Riverbank and Tamera Alcantor, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director and Authorize the City Manager to Execute the Agreement From: Marisela H. Garcia, City Manager
Submitted by: Marisela Garcia, City Manager

RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the City Council consider adopting a Resolution which will approve an Employment Agreement with Tamera Alcantor, Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director.

SUMMARY
Mrs. Alcantor's current contract expired December 15, 2025. Negotiation of a new contract was pending the conclusion of the Classification and Compensation Study. The proposed contract would be effective June 9, 2026, with a three-year term expiring June 8, 2026. However, the salary adjustment as a result of the recommendations implemented from the Classification and Compensation Study will be effective as of February 6, 2026.

STRATEGIC PLAN
This item, while not directly related to the City Council’s Strategic Plan Goals, does allow for the City to continue working towards achieving said goals.

BACKGROUND
After a successful executive-level recruitment by Mosaic Public Partners in 2022, Mrs. Tamera Alcantor was selected as the new Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director effective December 16, 2022. Mrs. Alcantor previously served as the Assistant Finance Director for Riverbank, and had also previously served as the City Manager for the City of Escalon. Her skill set has proven to be valuable in this position as she continues to oversee Finance, has now taken over the Human Resources Division, and continues to support the City Manager on a day-to-day basis.

Mrs. Alcantor's contract expired on December 15, 2025. Pending the conclusion of the Classification and Compensation Study, negotiations for a new contract began shortly after the recommendations from Evergreen Consulting, LLC. were received. The proposed terms of this contract were a result of the negotiations between the City Council and Mrs. Alcantor.

TERMS
Mrs. Alcantor’s proposed contract contains the following terms:

Item 10.8. - CC / LRA – 6/9/2026

1. Effective Date: As of June 9, 2026.

2. Term: Three (3) years from the Effective Date.

3. Base Salary: Effective December 16, 2025 salary is $173,467.61 or Step D of the Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director Salary Range 258:

Step
Range 258

A B C D E
Annual
Salary
$149,847.84 $157,340.23 $165,207.24 $173,467.61 $182,140.99 Effective February 6, 2026 salary shall be set at $195,239.53 or Step C of the new Assistant City Manager/Administrative Services Director Salary Range 315 as approved in the Classification and Compensation Study:

Step
Range 315

A B C D E
Annual
Salary
$177,088.01 $185,842.41 $195,239.53 $205,001.51 $215,251.58

4. Cost of Living Adjustments: During the term of the Agreement, City agrees to adjust the base salary as follows:

1. Effective the first full pay period in July 2026, the base salary shall be increased to reflect a four percent (4%) cost of living adjustment (COLA).

2. Effective the first full pay period of July 2027 the base salary shall be increased to reflect a four percent (4%) cost of living adjustment (COLA).

3. Effective the first full pay period of July 2028, the base salary shall be increased to reflect a three percent (3%) cost of living adjustment (COLA).

5. Review and Evaluation: To be conducted in December of each year.

6. Healthcare Benefits: Employee to pay 15% of premium costs for medical insurance. If employee has medical insurance coverage via her spouse, employee may waive benefits, with proof of coverage, and be eligible for a taxable cash amount of $450/month. City to pay full premium for vision and dental insurance.

7. Life Insurance: $100,000

8. Deferred Compensation: City to match employee’s contribution up to 2% of gross pay per pay period. City to contribute towards the Union Pension Retirement Fund at the rate currently established for the City.

9. Retirement: City to pay employer costs of participation in CalPERS Retirement System. Employee to be enrolled in the 2% @ 60 Classic Plan. Employee responsible for the 7% employee contribution.