Agenda — Roseville City Council, June 15, 2022 (part 1 of 5)

AGENDA
June 15, 2022

CITY COUNCIL

FINANCE AUTHORITY

HOUSING AUTHORITY

NATURAL GAS FINANCING AUTHORITY
6:00 p.m.

Council Chambers
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, California
www.roseville.ca.us
The meeting may be viewed on Comcast channel 14, Consolidated Communications channel 73, and AT&T U-Verse. City Council meetings are also video streamed live on the City’s website at roseville.ca.us/watch and roseville.ca.us/agenda, and the City’s YouTube channel at youtube.com/CityofRosevilleCa.

If you need a disability-related modification or accommodation to participate in this meeting, please contact Voice: 916-774-5200, TDD: 916-774-5220. Requests must be made as early as possible.

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WELCOMES YOUR PARTICIPATION
If an agenda item is open to public comment, such public comment shall be addressed to the chair of the meeting.

Public Comment - Speakers have three minutes under Public Comment to speak on issues that are not listed on the agenda and are within the City's jurisdiction. The Brown Act does not permit any action or discussion on items not listed on the agenda.

Consent Calendar - If applicable, the Consent Calendar consists of routine items that may be approved by one motion. Any person can remove an item from the Consent Calendar to be discussed separately.

Agenda Items - Speakers have five minutes to address items that are listed on the agenda.

Americans with Disabilities Act - Notify the City Clerk or Secretary at least 72 hours in advance if special assistance is required to participate in a meeting including the need of auxiliary aids or services.

Audio/Visual Presentations - If making a presentation regarding an agenda item, audio/visual materials must be submitted to the City Clerk or Secretary at least 72 hours in advance.

Security procedures are in place to attend Roseville City Council meetings. All attendees must successfully pass through a security metal detector. Any person with a prohibited item will not be allowed entry. Prohibited items include, but are not limited to: firearms (even with valid CCW), knives, pepper spray/mace, explosives of any kind/ any weapons and/or dangerous devices of any kind, illegal drugs and alcohol.

Roseville City Clerk 311 Vernon Street, Roseville, CA 916-774-5200 TDD 916-774-5220

1. CALL TO ORDER

2. ROLL CALL

3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

4. MEETING PROCEDURES

5. PRESENTATIONS

5.1. Proclamation - Juneteenth
Proclaim June 19, 2022 as Juneteenth and encourage all residents to mark their calendars and celebrate Juneteenth this month as we build a community of real and lasting justice and equality.

CONTACT: Blair Hutchison 916-774-5267 [email protected]

6. PUBLIC COMMENTS

7. CONSENT CALENDAR

BEGINNING OF CONSENT CALENDAR
Bids / Purchases / Services

7.1. Maidu Softball Restroom Renovation Project - Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Park Development Project Manager Heather Buck and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-212 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND CARTER-KELLY, INC.,
APPROVING A 15% CONTINGENCY AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6505 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET AND

DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff recommends award of the base bid for a total contract award amount of $115,700 to Carter-Kelly, Inc. This will result in a total project budget of $165,000, which includes the cost of design and engineering, construction, permits, inspections, construction administration, and contingency. The Maidu Softball Fields are located on the 152-acre regional park site located east of Rocky Ridge Drive and south of Douglas Boulevard.

The project includes minor alterations to the existing restrooms for accessibility and ease of maintenance. These improvements are necessary to replace the aging and deteriorating infrastructure and conform to current building code regulations. Staff requests authorization to approve change order requests in an amount not to exceed 15% of the contracted amount. Funding for the improvements is budgeted in the Maidu Softball Restroom Upgrade project in the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Capital Projects Fund with an offset using the City’s portion of the Youth Sports Coalition funds. Maintenance of the existing restrooms is via the General Fund and will remain unchanged.

CC #: 2134
File #: 0704 & 0201-01
CONTACT: Heather Buck 916-774-5254 [email protected]

7.2. Library Materials (RFP 13-087) - Purchase Order Renewals Memo from Recreation and Libraries Supervisor Jessica Huff and Parks, Recreation and Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-218 APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER
RENEWAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF LIBRARY MATERIALS; and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-219 APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER
RENEWAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF LIBRARY MATERIALS; and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-220 APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER
RENEWAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF LIBRARY MATERIALS; and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-221 APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER
RENEWAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF LIBRARY MATERIALS; and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-222 APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER
RENEWAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF LIBRARY MATERIALS. Staff
requests Council approve the renewal of purchase orders for FY2022-23 to Baker & Taylor, LLC, Bibliotheca, LLC, Ingram Library Services, LLC, Midwest Tape, LLC, and Overdrive, Inc. for the purchase of materials for the City library collection and approve two (2) additional one (1) year renewals. The total cost of the purchase orders for FY2022-23 is $375,000 and funds are included in the proposed FY2022-23 Parks, Recreation & Libraries budget in the General Fund. The funds for each future year will be requested in future budgets.

CC #: 2140
File #: 0203-10
CONTACT: Jessica Huff 916-774-5905 [email protected]

7.3. Mahany Tennis Courts Renovation Project – Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Park Development Project Manager Joel De Jong and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-224 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND DRYCO CONSTRUCTION,
INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE 6506 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021- 22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and
authorize approval of change orders in an amount not to exceed 10% of the contracted amount. Staff recommends award of the base bid and both additive alternatives for a total contract award amount of $943,267 to DRYCO Constructors, Inc. for the Mahany Tennis Courts Renovation Project. Funding for the renovation project is provided through the FY2020-21 General Fund surplus funds by a budget adjustment approved by Council at the May 18, 2022 meeting, along with a contribution from Roseville Joint Unified High School District in the amount of $111,499. Maintenance of the existing citywide park is provided by the General Fund and will remain unchanged.

CC #: 2142
File #: 0704-01 & 0201-01
CONTACT: Joel De Jong 916-774-5924 [email protected]

7.4. Washington Boulevard at All America City Boulevard Roundabout Project - Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Assistant Engineer Karen Vences and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-234

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE AND MARTIN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6507
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021- 2022 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff recommends Council award the Washington Boulevard at All America City Boulevard Roundabout Project to the sole responsive bidder, Martin Brothers Construction, in the amount of $5,057,740.70 with authorization for staff to exceed the award amount by 10% or $505,774 as a construction contingency. The construction scope of this project consists of clearing and grubbing, excavation, concrete and asphalt paving, sidewalk, lighting, storm drain, waterline, urban design, and landscape improvements. A budget adjustment is necessary in the amount of $7,120,297 to cover construction, construction contingency, staff time, permit fees, and construction management. The project will be funded with Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement funds, Local Transportation Funds, Highway Users Tax funds, Traffic Mitigation Fee funds, and Environmental Utility Water Rehabilitation Funds. No General Fund resources are allocated for this project.

CC #: 2153
File #: 0900-04-02
CONTACT: Karen Vences 916-774-5412 [email protected]

7.5. Open Space and Preserve Land Goat Grazing - Contract Purchase Agreement Memo from Parks, Recreation, & Libraries Superintendent Eric Dexter and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-225 APPROVING A CONTRACT

PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE AND ECOSYSTEM CONCEPTS, INC., AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3002231). Staff requests Council approve a contract purchase agreement with Ecosystem Concepts, Inc. for grazing of land for vegetation management and fire prevention on City-owned properties throughout the City, which includes a one (1) year base term with the option of five (5) additional oneyear extensions, not to exceed annual budgeted amounts. The amount of the agreement for FY2022-23 is $431,000. Funding is budgeted in the Open Space and Preserve Funds, as well as the General Fund with funding from the local Measure B sales tax.

CC #: 2143
File #: 0704-02
CONTACT: Eric Dexter 916-746-1769 [email protected]

7.6. Sodium Hydroxide (BACC 12-2022) - Contract Purchase Agreement Memo from Buyer Becky Philipp and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-228 APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY

AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND UNIVAR SOLUTIONS
USA, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3002064). Staff requests Council approve a contract purchase agreement with Univar Solutions USA, Inc. as the lowest responsive bidder for Bay Area Chemical Consortium Bid No. 12- 2022 for the supply and delivery of sodium hydroxide solution for the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant, Barton Road Water Treatment Plant, and the Roseville Energy Park. The estimated annual cost for FY2022-23 is $1,011,000. Funding is included in the Environmental Utilities and Electric Departments' proposed FY2022-23 budgets. The bid allowed for three optional renewal years at one-year intervals.

Staff requests authorization to continue utilizing the remaining optional renewal years of the bid contract without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved each year, until the contract expires or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest.

CC #: 2147
File #: 0203-03
CONTACT: Becky Philipp 916-774-5724 [email protected]

7.7. Sodium Hypochlorite (BACC 13-2022) - Contract Purchase Agreement Memo from Buyer Becky Philipp and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-229 APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY

AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND UNIVAR SOLUTIONS
USA, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3002203). Staff recommends Council approve a contract purchase agreement with Univar Solutions USA, Inc. as the lowest responsive bidder for Bay Area Chemical Consortium Bid No. 13- 2022 for the supply and delivery of 12.5% sodium hypochlorite for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant, Barton Road Water Treatment Plant, Roseville Energy Park, Environmental Utilities' wells, and the Roseville Aquatics Complex. The estimated annual cost is $672,000. Funding is included in the Environmental Utilities, Electric, and Parks, Recreation and Libraries Departments’ proposed FY2022-23 budgets. The bid allowed for three optional renewal years at one-year intervals. Staff requests authorization to continue utilizing the remaining optional renewal years of the bid contract without further Council approvals until the contract expires or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest.

CC #: 2148
File #: 0203-03
CONTACT: Becky Philipp 916-774-5724 [email protected]

7.8. Liquid Aluminum Sulfate (BACC 01-2022) - Contract Purchase Agreement Memo from Buyer Becky Philipp and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-209 APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY

AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND CHEMTRADE

CHEMICALS US LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
(3002245). Staff requests Council approval of a contract purchase agreement with Chemtrade Chemicals US LLC as the lowest responsive bidder for Bay Area Chemical Consortium Bid No. 01-2022 for the supply and delivery of liquid aluminum sulfate for the City's water treatment plant. The estimated annual cost is $175,000. Funding is included in the Environmental Utilities Department’s proposed FY2022-23 budget. The bid allowed for three optional renewal years at one-year intervals. Staff requests authorization to continue utilizing the remaining optional renewal years of the bid contract without further Council approvals until the contract expires or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest.

CC #: 2128
File #: 0203-03
CONTACT: Becky Philipp 916-774-5724 [email protected]

7.9. Aggregate Products (RFQ 10-3323) - Purchase Orders Memo from Buyer Sue Jessup and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-197 APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER FOR THE PURCHASE
OF AGGREGATE PRODUCTS ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS; and adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 22-198 APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER FOR

THE PURCHASE OF AGGREGATE PRODUCTS ON AN AS-NEEDED
BASIS. Staff requests Council authorize two purchase orders with Hastie’s Capitol Sand & Gravel and Triangle Rock Products, LLC as the lowest responsive and responsible bidders for the purchase of aggregate products in response to RFQ 10-3323. Various City departments will use this bid for ongoing aggregate product needs, including the Public Works Department's Streets Division, the Environmental Utilities Department's Water and Wastewater Divisions, the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department, and the Electric Department. Funding is included in each department’s respective funds.

The estimated total annual spending for FY2022-23 is $175,000.

CC #: 2116
File #: 0203-04 CONTACT: Sue Jessup 916-746-1702 [email protected]

7.10.Tires (RFQ 10-3322) – Contract Purchase Agreement
Memo from Buyer Tiffany Valdez and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-231 APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY
AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND FLEET TIRE, INC.

DBA BRANNON TIRE, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO
EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3002144).

Staff requests Council approve a contract purchase agreement with Fleet Tire, Inc. dba Brannon Tire for the purchase and repair of tires on an as-needed basis.

The Fleet Services Division has a recurring demand for a variety of tires to maintain the City’s vehicle fleet. The total estimated annual amount of the award for FY2022- 23 is $450,000. Funding for FY2022-23 is included in the Proposed Budget in the Fleet Services Fund. Staff requests authorization to renew without further Council approval.

CC #: 2150
File #: 0203-02
CONTACT: Tiffany Valdez 916-774-5708 [email protected]

7.11.Very High Frequency Radio System Support - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement
Memo from IT Program Manager Karl Grover and Chief Information Officer Hong Sae recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-233

APPROVING A SOLE SOURCE CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT,

BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SILKE
COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3002339). Staff requests Council approval of a contract purchase agreement with Silke Communications to provide two years of support and enhancement of the City's Very High Frequency (VHF) radio system which will not exceed $150,000. Support and maintenance of the VHF system is included in the proposed FY2022-23 Information Technology Operations Fund budget.

CC #: 2152
File #: 0203-05
CONTACT: Karl Grover 916-774-5145 [email protected]

7.12.Paving and Striping Services - Contract Purchase Agreement Memo from Administrative Technician Darci Carpenter and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-226 APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE

AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND
SIERRA STRIPING, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE (3002225).

Staff requests Council approval of a contract purchase agreement with Sierra Striping, Inc. to provide paving and striping services and repairs on an asneeded basis at various City locations in the amount of $200,000. Funding for this agreement is included in the proposed FY2022-23 budget in the Facility Services and Facility Rehabilitation funds. Staff requests authorization to utilize the four (4) optional one (1) year renewals of the contract without further Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, until the contract expires or until Staff determines that continuing with the same vendor in not in the City’s best interest. CC #: 2144 File #: 0203-04
CONTACT: Darci Carpenter 916-727-5702 [email protected]

7.13.Vehicle Purchases – Purchase Orders
Memo from Fleet Manager Brian Craighead and Public Works Director Jason Shykowski recommending the City Council approve a purchase order to A-Z Bus Sales Inc. for two (2) Toyota Sienna vans with ADA accessibility utilizing RFQ 10-3325 in the amount of $152,898; and approve a purchase order to American Truck and Trailer Body Company, Inc. for two (2) streetlight pole trailers utilizing RFQ 10-3326 in the amount of $114,918. Funding for these vehicles is included in the FY2021-22 Transit Fund and Electric Fund budgets.

CC #: 2132
File #: 0203-01
CONTACT: Brian Craighead 916-774-5731 [email protected] Resolutions

7.14.Campus Oaks CO-6 Subdivision - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector Danny Jacobo and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-195 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS CAMPUS OAKS
CO-6 SUBDIVISION PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF
COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS
OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION. The
Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #: 2113
File #: 0400-04-18
CONTACT: Danny Jacobo 916-223-7486 [email protected]

7.15.Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6 Backbone Project - Notice of Completion
Memo from Construction Inspector Darin Crockett and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-217 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS FIDDYMENT
RANCH - PHASE 3 VILLAGE F-6 BACKBONE PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND

DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE
RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #: 2139
File #: 0400-04-09-1
CONTACT: Darin Crockett 916-751-9196 [email protected]

7.16.Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6C1 - Notice of Completion Memo from Senior Construction Inspector Darin Crockett and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-207 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN
AS FIDDYMENT RANCH - PHASE 3 Village F-6C1 PROJECT,
APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING

AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP
OF THE SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #: 2025
File #: 0400-04-09-1
CONTACT: Darin Crockett 916-751-9196 [email protected]

7.17.Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6C2 - Notice of Completion Memo from Construction Inspector Darin Crockett and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-208 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS FIDDYMENT RANCH - PHASE 3 VILLAGE F-6C2 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING A N D DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF O F THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #: 2126
File #: 0400-04-09-1
CONTACT: Darin Crockett 916-751-9196 [email protected]

7.18.Market Street - Segment 4 - Notice of Completion
Memo from Construction Inspector Cody Allen and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-211 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS MARKET
STREET – SEGMENT 4 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF
COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE

DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE
SUBDIVISION. The Engineering Division has made final inspection of the project and has found the civil improvement work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications. This action has no impact to the City's General Fund. Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #: 2130
File #: 0400-04-12-1
CONTACT: Cody Allen 916-517-7598 [email protected]

7.19.Sierra Vista Village KT-2A - Notice of Completion
Memo from Construction Inspector Troy Galvin and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-201 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA
VILLAGE KT-2A PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF
COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #: 2119
File #: 0400-04-12-1
CONTACT: Troy Galvin 916-223-7441 [email protected]

7.20.Sierra Vista Village KT-3A - Notice of Completion
Memo from Construction Inspector Troy Galvin and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-202 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA
VILLAGE KT-3A PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF
COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #: 2120
File #: 0400-04-12-1
CONTACT: Troy Galvin 916-223-7441 [email protected]

7.21.Sierra Vista Village KT-3B - Notice of Completion
Memo from Construction Inspector Troy Galvin and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-203 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA
VILLAGE KT-3B PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF
COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #: 2021
File #: 0400-04-12-1
CONTACT: Troy Galvin 916-223-7441 [email protected]

7.22.Sierra Vista Village KT-5A - Notice of Completion
Memo from Construction Inspector Troy Galvin and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-204 ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA
VILLAGE KT-5A PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF
COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY

ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

CC #: 2022
File #: 0400-04-12-1
CONTACT: Troy Galvin 916-223-7441 [email protected]

7.23.Sierra Vista Village FD-06 - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Memo from Assistant Engineer Kerry Andrews and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-213 APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION,
INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests approval of the Sierra Vista Village FD-6 Subdivision Agreement and final map. Review of the final map has been completed and it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create 95 residential lots, a private street (Lot A) and 3 public landscape lots. The actions requested have no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund.

CC #: 2135
File #: 0400-04-12-1 & 0400-07
CONTACT: Kerry Andrews 916-774-5346 [email protected]

7.24.Sierra Vista Village FD-24 - Phase 1 - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Memo from Associate Engineer Edward Winston and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-215 APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND FD-24, LLC, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests approval of the Sierra Vista Village FD-24 Phase 1 Subdivision Agreement and final map. Review of the final map has been completed and it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create 105 residential lots, a private street (Lot A), 2 private pedestrian access and drainage lots, and a private landscape lot. The actions requested have no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund.

CC #: 2137
File #: 0400-04-12-1 & 0400-07
CONTACT: Edward Winston 916-774-5432 [email protected]

7.25.Sierra Vista Village FD-24 - Phase 2 - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Memo from Assistant Engineer Kerry Andrews and Development Services Director Mike Isom recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-216 APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND FD-24, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE. Staff requests approval of the Sierra Vista Village FD-24 Phase 2 Subdivision Agreement and final map. Review of the final map has been completed and it is in compliance with the approved tentative map. This map will create 30 residential lots, 2 private street lots (Lots A and B), and 2 public landscape lots. The actions requested have no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund.

CC #: 2138
File #: 0400-04-12-1 & 0400-07
CONTACT: Kerry Andrews 916-774-5346 [email protected]

7.26.California State Library Zip Books - Grant Award
Memo from Recreation and Libraries Supervisor Jessica Huff and Parks, Recreation and Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-199 ACCEPTING A GRANT AWARD FROM

THE CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council accept a $12,000 grant award from the California State Library to be used towards the continuation of the Zip Books program in all three (3) Roseville libraries. The grant fully funds the Zip Books program and funds have been included in the current Parks, Recreation and Libraries Department's FY2021-22 budget in the General Fund.

CC #: 2117
File #: 0214 & 0716
CONTACT: Jessica Huff 916-774-5905 [email protected]

7.27.Expanded Learning Opportunities Program - Memorandum of Understanding Memo from Parks, Recreation & Libraries Manager Jeff Nereson and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-210 APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING, BY AND BETWEEN THE DRY CREEK JOINT

ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve the Memorandum of Understanding with the Dry Creek Elementary School District ("District") for the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program ("ELOP"). The ELOP program is offered to students who meet the qualifications of being low income (measured by Free/Reduced Lunch eligibility), English learner, or a foster youth. The District desires to offer the opportunity for ELOP eligible students to participate in the Adventure Camp program during the summer and Adventure Club program after school during all academic school days at Coyote Ridge Elementary School. There will be no negative fiscal impact to the Youth Development Fund for this program. The District will compensate the City for each ELOP eligible student registration, as well as the costs for program supplies, snacks, and enrichment components.

CC #: 2129
File #: 0704 & 0705
CONTACT: Jeff Nereson 916-774-5974 [email protected]

7.28.Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority - Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget Memo from Accounting Manager Nick Rosas and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council, acting as the Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority, adopt ROSEVILLE NATURAL GAS FINANCING AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 1-22 ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23. Staff requests approval of the $16.8 million Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority (RNGFA) budget for FY2022-23. The RNGFA issued the 2007 Gas Revenue Bonds which financed the prepayment of natural gas used for power generation at the Roseville Energy Park. Approval of the annual budget has no new fiscal impact.

CC #: 2146
File #: 0103-17 & 0201
CONTACT: Nick Rosas 916-774-5314 [email protected]

7.29.Tax Revenue Consulting Services - Professional Services Agreement Amendment
Memo from Budget Manager Scott Pettingell and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-230 APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO

PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND MUNISERVICES, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve a professional services agreement amendment with MuniServices, LLC to increase the not-to-exceed amount to $250,000 per year, or $500,000 over the initial two-year term. MuniServices, LLC provide sales tax and transaction and use tax auditing, projection, recovery, and consultant services. The misallocated sales tax and transaction and use tax identified by MuniServices, LLC's audit and recovery services were significantly higher than initially projected. The additional sales and use tax revenues that the City receives for the General Fund, from these services, more than offsets the cost.

CC #: 2149
File #: 0200
CONTACT: Scott Pettingell 916-774-1306 [email protected]

7.30.Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Energy and Storage System Project - Grant Application
Memo from Assistant Environmental Utilities Director Sean Bigley and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-206 APPROVING A GRANT

APPLICATION TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

COMMERCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINSTRATION, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE

ALL RELATED FORMS AND AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY
OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve grant application documents for the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Energy and Storage System Project under the Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration’s (EDA) Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant and acknowledge the availability of sufficient resources in the Water Rehabilitation Fund for the required local grant match. If the City's EDA Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant application is approved, total project costs are $6,592,877 with $4,925,776 in federal grant funds, $1,231,444 in local matching funds and $435,657 in non-reimbursable administrative costs from the Water Rehabilitation Fund which is funded by water utility sales. Upon award of the Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant by the EDA to the City, a budget adjustment will be placed on a future City Council agenda for City Council consideration.

CC #: 2124
File #: 0800-02 & 0214
CONTACT: Sean Bigley 916-774-5513 [email protected]

7.31.United States Bureau of Reclamation - Letter of Agreement to Expand the City’s Service Area to include Amoruso Ranch
Memo from Principal Engineer George Hanson and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-232 APPROVING A LETTER OF AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR,

BUREAU OF RECLAMATION AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve a Letter of Agreement with the United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation that compensates the federal government for the cost of processing an amended water service area to the City’s Central Valley project. Funding in the amount of $5,000 is from the Water Operations Fund and shall be reimbursed to the City by the Land Owner per Section 3.8.8 of the Development Agreement between the City and Brookfield Sunset, LLC and Jennifer M. Amoruso dated August 24, 2016. This action has no impact on the General Fund. CC #: 2151
File #: 0800-02
CONTACT: George Hanson 916-746-1764 [email protected]

7.32.Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Ultraviolet Disinfection System Addition Project - Professional Design Services Agreement Amendment Memo from Principal Engineer Bryan Buchanan and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-227 APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL

DESIGN SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE AND CAROLLO ENGINEERS, INC., AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approval of the First Amendment to the Professional Design Services Agreement with Carollo Engineers for engineering services for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant Ultraviolet Disinfection System Addition Project. The Amendment increases the previous contract amount of $460,552 by $364,661 for a revised total contract cost of $825,213. Funding for this work is provided under the capital improvement projects for the South Placer Wastewater Authority and will be jointly funded between Roseville and the other Regional Partners, Placer County and the South Placer Municipal Utility District.

CC #: 2145
File #: 0900-02-02-2
CONTACT: Bryan Buchanan 916-746-1812 [email protected]

7.33.Digital Billboard Project - Sublease Agreement Amendment Memo from Economic Development Project Manager Robert Cline and Economic Development Director Melissa Anguiano recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-214 APPROVING A FIRST

AMENDMENT TO SUBLEASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, LLC, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approve a First Amendment to the Sublease Agreement with Clear Channel Outdoor at 290 Conference Center Drive, which will correct a discrepancy between the dollar amounts in the agreement and what was agreed upon in negotiations and presented to City Council for approval. The Sublease at 290 Conference Center Drive will result in approximately $7.5 million in revenue to the General Fund over the twenty-year term.

CC #: 2136
File #: 0321
CONTACT: Robert Cline 916-746-1172 [email protected]

7.34.Classification and Compensation Studies - Professional Services Agreement Memo from Human Resources Manager Linda Hampton and Human Resources Director Stacey Peterson recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-205 APPROVING A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND
BRYCE HR CONSULTING, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE. Staff requests Council approval of a professional services agreement with Bryce HR Consulting, Inc. for citywide employee classification and compensation analysis. The total compensation shall not exceed $75,000.

This cost is budgeted in the proposed FY2022-23 Human Resources budget in the General Fund.

CC #: 2123
File #: 0600
CONTACT: Linda Hampton 916-774-5215 [email protected] Ordinances (for introduction and adoption - appropriation/urgency measures)

7.35.Crimson Ridge Park (CO-62) Reimbursement – Budget Adjustment Memo from the Park Planning & Development Superintendent Tara Gee and Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director Jill Geller recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6503 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET AND

DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. On August 2, 2021, City Council approved a Park Development Agreement (PDA) between the City and Lennar Homes in which the City agreed to reimburse Lennar Homes $248,803 for paid neighborhood park fees collected prior to the approval of the PDA. Typically, park fee credits are given to offset the up-front costs for the developer to construct a park early. Since Crimson Ridge Park was originally to be constructed by the City, neighborhood park fees were collected. Lennar Homes subsequently sought to build the park “turn-key”. This prompted the need for a PDA. In the PDA, the reimbursement amount of $248,803 is triggered when a payment bond has been secured. On May 17, 2022, a letter was received which confirmed that a payment bond has been posted. The letter also formally requested reimbursement. If approved, funding is provided through the Campus Oaks Neighborhood Park Fund. There will be no General Fund impact.

CC #: 2114
File #: 0704-01 & 0201-01
CONTACT: Tara Gee 916-774-5253 [email protected]

7.36.Fiscal Year 2021-22 - Year-End Budget Adjustments
Memo from Budget Manager Scott Pettingell and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6509 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO
THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS

ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN
APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO.
6510 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and
adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6511 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS

ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN
APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO.
6512 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and
adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6513 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS

ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN
APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO.
6514 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and
adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6515 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS

ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN
APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO.
6516 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and
adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6517 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS

ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN
APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO.
6518 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and
adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6519 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS

ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN
APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO.
6520 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE; and
adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6521 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS

ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN
APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approve year-end budget adjustments to the FY2021-22 budget. There are adequate resources available within all of the impacted funds.

CC #: 2155
File #: 0201 & 0201-01
CONTACT: Scott Pettingell 916-774-1306 [email protected]

7.37.Aquifer Storage and Recovery Production Wells and Monitoring Well Sites - Property Transfer and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Hydrogeologist Trevor Joseph and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6502 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR
2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE
IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approval of an internal transfer of land from the Parks, Recreation and Libraries Department to the Environmental Utilities (EU) Department. The transfer includes property contained in eight City-owned parcels and supports development of five of the City’s planned Aquifer Storage and Recovery production well and pump station facilities and for land adjacent to a monitoring well. EU will transfer the value of the property of $491,054 from the Water Construction Fund via the Groundwater Well Property project to assigned park development projects to offset capital costs.

CC #: 2112
File #: 0800-02
CONTACT: Trevor Joseph 916-517-2578 [email protected]

7.38.Mobile Message Board - Budget Adjustment
Memo from Water Conservation Administrator Bobby Alvarez and Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker recommending the City Council adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6508 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS

ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN
APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council approve a budget adjustment to fund the purchase of a mobile messaging board through the Fleet Replacement Fund for the Water Efficiency Section of the Water Utility Division.

The board will be used to advertise drought messaging, events, and water saving reminders throughout the year. This budget adjustment requests an increase in the Water Efficiency Section budget of $19,054 to fully fund the cost of the mobile messaging board. That amount will be paid to the Fleet Replacement Fund, which purchases City vehicles. This will result in a decrease in the Water Operations Fund’s available resources of $19,054. The future rent and replacement for this vehicle (approximately $3,000 for the next fiscal year) will be paid for via appropriations in the FY2022-23 Water Operations Fund budget. The Water Operations Fund receives revenue from water utility sales.

CC #: 2154
File #: 0900-02 & 0201-01
CONTACT: Bobby Alvarez 916-746-1710 [email protected] Ordinances (for second reading and adoption)

7.39.Second Reading - Sierra Vista Specific Plan - Rezone, and Development Agreement Amendments
ORDINANCE NO. 6524 AMENDING ZONING ORDINANCE NO. 5428 OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE CHANGING THE ZONING OF CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6525 ADOPTING A SECOND AMENDMENT OF

THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE AND MOURIER INVESTMENTS, LLC, RELATIVE TO THE

SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6526 ADOPTING A SECOND

AMENDMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SV 218, LLC RELATIVE TO

THE SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6527 ADOPTING A SIXTH

AMENDMENT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SVC2, LLC RELATIVE TO

THE SIERRA VISTA SPECIFIC PLAN AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE, for second reading and adoption.

CC #: 2118
File #: 0400-04-12-2
CONTACT: Shelby Maples 916-746-1347 [email protected] Reports / Requests

7.40.Financial Audit Reports for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2021 Memo from Accounting Manager Nick Rosas and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council receive six informational financial reports for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2021. There is no impact to the City's General Fund.

CC #: 2127
File #: 0200 & 0103-17
CONTACT: Nick Rosas 916-774-5314 [email protected]

7.41.Out-of-State Travel Request - Police Department
Memo from Management Analyst Mark Peinado and Police Chief Troy Bergstrom recommending the City Council approve out-of-state travel to Aurora, Colorado, for one School Resource Officer to attend the National School Safety Conference from July 3, 2022 to July 8, 2022. The travel and training cost for this conference is fully sponsored by West Park High School.

CC #: 2131
File #: 0600-02
CONTACT: Mark Peinado 916-774-5021 [email protected]

7.42.Out-of-State Travel Request - Electric Utility Department Memo from Electric Utility Director Daniel Beans recommending the City Council approve out-of-state travel for his attendance of the 2022 National Association of Home Builders Legislative Rally in Washington, D.C. on June 15, 2022 to discuss critical transformer supply chain issues with legislators on Capitol Hill. Costs related to travel, airfare, lodging and per diem are estimated to be $1,000. Funds are available in the Electric Department’s FY2021-22 budget.

CC #: 2133
File #: 0600-02
CONTACT: Daniel Beans 916-774-5603 [email protected]

END OF CONSENT CALENDAR

8. ORDINANCES

8.1. General Municipal Election - November 8, 2022
Memo from City Clerk Carmen Avalos and City Attorney Michelle Sheidenberger recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22- 193 DECLARING A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 8, 2022, AND REQUESTING THE PLACER

COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONSOLIDATE THE ELECTION
WITH ANY OTHER ELECTION CONDUCTED ON SAID DATE; AND

REQUESTING ELECTION SERVICES BE PROVIDED BY THE PLACER

COUNTY CLERK TO FILL TWO CITY COUNCIL VACANCIES IN CITY OF ROSEVILLE DISTRICTS 2 AND 4; AND TO SUBMIT A TRANSIENT

OCCUPANCY TAX MEASURE TO THE VOTERS OF THE CITY OF
ROSEVILLE; and adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-194 SUBMITTING

BALLOT MEASURE TEXT FOR THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE TRANSIENT

OCCUPANCY TAX (TOT) MEASURE TO THE VOTERS AT THE
NOVEMBER 8, 2022 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION; DIRECTING
THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS; AND

DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR

FILING PRIMARY ARGUMENTS AND REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS
REGARDING THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE TOT MEASURE; and adopt AN

ORDINANCE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE

AMENDING THE TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX RATE BY AMENDING
SECTION 4.24.030 OF CHAPTER 4.24 OF TITLE 4 OF THE ROSEVILLE MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX. The
total cost for the 2022 election and associated services is estimated to be $185,000. Costs for the election are included in the proposed City Clerk Elections FY2022-23 budget in the General Fund. Staff estimate that a hotel and lodging tax of 10% would generate an estimated increase of $2.7 to $3 million annually for the General Fund that would help to offset the cost of City services and amenities used by overnight and short-term guests.

CC #: 2111
File #: 0502-01 & 0502-07
CONTACT: Carmen Avalos 916-774-5269 [email protected]

8.2. Vernon Street Substation Expansion - Property Acquisition of 1415 Vernon Street and Budget Adjustment
Memo from Economic Development Project Manager Robert Cline and Electric Utility Director Dan Beans recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-200 AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF ANY
AND ALL DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE ACQUISITION OF 1415
VERNON STREET; and adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6523 AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BUDGET AND

DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE. Staff requests Council authorize the City Manager to execute any and all agreements and documents related to the acquisition of 1415 Vernon Street for a purchase price not to exceed $500,000.

The electric utility department anticipates the need for a future expansion of the Vernon Street Substation and has an interest in acquiring the parcel directly adjacent to the substation site. Staff also requests approval of a budget adjustment in the amount of $500,000 from the Electric Fund to cover all costs associated with the acquisition of 1415 Vernon Street.

CC #: 2141
File #: 1001 & 0201-01 & 0800-03
CONTACT: Robert Cline 916-746-1172 [email protected]

8.3. City of Roseville FY2022-23 Citywide Budget, Position Allocation Schedule, Roseville Housing Authority Budget, and Roseville Finance Authority Budget Memo from Budget Manager Scott Pettingell and Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer Dennis Kauffman recommending the City Council acting as the Board of Directors for the Roseville Housing Authority, adopt RESOLUTION NO. 3-22 APPROVING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022- 23; and adopt adopt ORDINANCE NO. 6522 ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023, ADOPTING BUDGET

CONTROL POLICIES, ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT,

ADOPTING THE BUDGET FOR THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY OF THE

ROSEVILLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, TO BE EFFECTIVE
IMMEDIATELY AS AN URGENCY MEASURE; and adopt ROSEVILLE
FINANCE AUTHORITY RESOLUTION NO. 2-22 ADOPTING THE
ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23. Staff requests Council approve out-of-state travel requests, new vehicle requests, and the Citywide position allocation schedule as incorporated into the Fiscal Year 2022- 23 budget document, effective July 1, 2022. The FY2022-23 proposed citywide expenditure budget totals $767 million from all funding sources. The budget for the General Fund is $228.7 million, which includes operating ($211.8 million) and non-operating expenditures ($16.9 million). The FY2022-23 Housing Authority program expenditure budget is $6.8 million and is primarily comprised of funding from the federally-funded Housing Choice Voucher Program for the purpose of providing rental assistance to over 700 very-low income households in Roseville and Rocklin. The cost to the General Fund for the administration of this program is $81,948 and is included in the City's proposed FY2022-23 budget. The FY2022-23 Roseville Finance Authority Budget includes debt service payments of $2.4 million reflecting scheduled payments on the Certificates of Participation for the Corporation Yard, golf courses, and 316 Vernon Street. Transfers out of the capital improvement fund of $572,564 represents money transferred to the Citywide Parks Fund for the repayment of a loan from the Fleet Replacement Fund which partially funded the construction of Harry Crabb Park.

CC #: 2156
File #: 0201 & 0103-03-02 & 0103-29-02
CONTACT: Scott Pettingell 916-774-1306 [email protected]

9. PUBLIC HEARING

NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
City Council, when considering the matter scheduled for hearing, will take the following actions:

1. 2.

3. 4.

5. 6.

7. 8.

Open the Public Hearing
Presentation by Staff
Presentation by applicant or Appellant
Accept Public Testimony
Appellant or Applicant Rebuttal Period
Close the Public Hearing
City Council Comments and Questions
City Council Action
In the future, if you wish to challenge in court any of the matters on this agenda for which a public hearing is to be conducted, you may be limited to raising only those issues, which you, or someone else raised orally at the Public Hearing or in written correspondence received by the City or before the hearing Public Hearings listed for continuance will be continued as noted and posting of this agenda serves as notice of continuation.

9.1. 2022 Weed Abatement - Public Hearing
Memo from Fire Division Chief Jason Rizzi and Fire Chief Rick Bartee recommending the City Council adopt RESOLUTION NO. 22-196

ORDERING THE DESTRUCTION OR REMOVAL OF ALL WEEDS, DIRT,

RUBBISH AND RANK GROWTHS IN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, AND
OVERRULING ANY AND ALL OBJECTIONS THERETO. This item is the second and final step necessary to initiate the 2022 Weed Abatement Program.

Owners of private parcels that are abated by the City are responsible for the costs associated with providing abatement services. A bill is sent to each property owner detailing the abatement costs, as well as an administrative fee. If the property owner fails to pay the bill, the City places a lien on the subject property and the monies owed are reimbursed through the property tax collection process.

CC #: 2115
File #: 0320-01
CONTACT: Jason Rizzi 916-774-5802 [email protected]

10. REPORTS / PUBLIC COMMENTS

11. ADJOURNMENT

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2118
File #: 0102-06
Title: Proclamation - Juneteenth
Contact: Blair Hutchison 916-774-5267 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 5.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Proclaim June 19, 2022 as Juneteenth and encourage all residents to mark their calendars and celebrate Juneteenth this month as we build a community of real and lasting justice and equality.

BACKGROUND
Not applicable.

FISCAL IMPACT
Not applicable.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Ceremonial documents meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Not applicable.

Respectfully Submitted,
Blair Hutchison, City Clerk Technician
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Proclamation - Juneteenth

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2134
File #: 0704 & 0201-01
Title:

Maidu Softball Restroom Renovation Project - Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Heather Buck 916-774-5254 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.1.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommend that the City Council:
1) Approve the Award of the project to the lowest responsive bidder, Carter-Kelly, Inc., in the amount of $115,700; and
2) Adopt a resolution to authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with Carter-Kelly, Inc. on behalf of the City of Roseville and additionally authorize change order requests in an amount not to exceed 15% of the contracted amount; and
3) Adopt an ordinance to approve a budget adjustment of $45,000 from the City-wide Park Fund (Fund 3303) to the Maidu Softball Restroom Renovation Project (500203).

BACKGROUND
The Maidu Softball Fields are located on the 152 acre regional park site located east of Rocky Ridge Drive and south of Douglas Boulevard. The project includes minor alterations to the existing restrooms for ease of maintenance and accessibility, including replacement of concrete floor for accessible slope, toilet partitions, lighting, doors, and signage. These improvements are necessary to replace the aging and deteriorating infrastructure and conform to current building code regulations.

City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized the call for bids at the February 2, 2022, meeting. Bids were opened on May 3, 2022, and staff received one bid for the project.

The bid results are as follows:

Bidder Total Lump Sum Bid
Carter-Kelly, Inc. $115,700
Engineer’s Estimate $109,300

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the improvements is as follows: $120,000 budgeted in the Maidu Softball Restroom Upgrade project in the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Capital Projects Fund (Fund 3130) and $45,000 added with the recommended budget adjustment from the Citywide Park Fund (Fund 3303), which is a portion of the City’s share of fees from the Youth Sports Coalition player fees.

Maintenance of the existing restrooms is via the General Fund and will remain unchanged.

CONTINGENCY
During the course of a construction project, it is common to encounter unanticipated or changed conditions in the field that necessitate additions or other changes to the project and the contract.

Due to the age of the facility (over 30 years old) and the small contract amount, the typical 10% contingency provides minimal options to address any unforeseen conditions, therefore, staff requests authorization to approve change order requests in an amount not to exceed 15% of the contract price in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contracts.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves minor alterations of an existing facility. The proposed alterations meet the specified criteria, and is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Heather Buck, Park Development Project Manager
Jill Geller, Director, Parks, Recreation & Libraries
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-212
Agreement
Ordinance 6505
Budget Adjustment
Vicinity Map
Bid Summary
RESOLUTION NO. 22-212

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND CARTER-KELLY, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT

ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, an agreement for the Maidu Softball Restroom Renovation Project, by and between the City of Roseville and Carter-Kelly, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed fifteen percent (15%) of the contract price.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

ORDINANCE NO. 6505

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCAL YEAR 2021-22

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2021-22, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Maidu Softball Restroom Renovation project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to post a true copy of the foregoing ordinance in each of three (3) conspicuous locations in the City and she shall immediately after such posting enter in the ordinance book, under the record of the ordinance, a certificate under her hand stating the time and place of such publication by posting.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
5/12/20224:30 PM
1 REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Heather Buck, Park Development Project Manager FISCAL YEAR: 2021-22 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Kathy Cullen, Management Analyst II COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 6/15/22 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Recreation & Libraries ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
3303 6587 84001 500203 45,000
45,000

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
-
45,000

FUND BALANCE
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
3303 (45,000)
(45,000)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD / DESIGNEE DATE BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / DESIGNEE DATE CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

POSTED BY DATE
Revised: June 24, 2019

ACCOUNT STRING
TOTAL

DESCRIPTION
Use of the City’s portion of the City-wide Park fund provided by the Youth Sports Coalition player fees
REQUIRED APPROVALS:

BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

The Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department is requesting a budget adjustment of $45,000.00 for the Maidu softball restroom renovation project, which includes minor alterations to the existing restrooms for accessibility and ease of maintenance. These improvements are necessary to replace the aging and deteriorating infrastructure and conform to current building code regulations. This budget adjustment will increase the total project budget to $165,000.00. The project funding consists of the following: $120,000.00 from the existing project budget from the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Capital Projects Fund (Fund 3130), which was carried forward from the FY2019-20 budget and $45,000 from the City-wide Park Fund (Fund 3303), which is a portion of the City’s share of fees from the Youth Sports Coalition.

TOTAL
TOTAL

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
Increase to expenditures for the Maidu Softball Renovation project from the City-Wide Park Fund.

NET ADJUSTMENT

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
05/12/2022
Maidu Softball Restroom Vicinity Map
Rocky Ridge
Drive
Softball Restrooms
(Area of Work)
Maidu Regional
Park
Johnson
Ranch Drive

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2140
File #: 0203-10
Title: Library Materials (RFP 13-087) - Purchase Order Renewals Contact: Jessica Huff 916-774-5905 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.2.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council approve the renewal of purchase orders for FY2022-23 to Baker & Taylor, LLC, Bibliotheca, LLC, Ingram Library Services, LLC, Midwest Tape, LLC, and Overdrive, Inc. for the purchase of materials for the City of Roseville library collection.

Additionally, staff recommends that the City Council adopt resolutions to approve two (2) additional one (1) year renewals of each purchase order without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

BACKGROUND
The Parks, Recreation & Libraries (PRL) Department has a recurring requirement for materials for public use in all three (3) libraries and online. These materials include informational, recreational and educational books, physical media such as DVDs and CDs, eBooks and eAudiobooks that will be available to our customers to download or check out.

The PRL Department issued a request for proposals (RFP) in April 2020 for vendors who provide a variety of library materials for purchase. Five (5) vendors were chosen, all from which the PRL Department has been purchasing library materials for the past several years and have proven to be reliable, efficient and cost effective. Those vendors are Baker & Taylor, LLC, Bibliotheca, LLC, Ingram Library Services, LLC, Midwest Tape, LLC, and Overdrive, Inc.

The RFP was awarded in 2020 for a two-year term and allows for three (3) additional one-year renewals. This is the first option to renew of the three (3) additional renewals. PRL’s experience with all five (5) vendors has met the City's standards and staff recommends renewing the purchase orders for an additional year, with the option to renew for two (2) additional one-year terms in FY2023-24 and FY2024-25.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for library materials is included in the proposed Parks, Recreation & Libraries FY2022-23 budget in the General Fund. The not-to-exceed amount is $375,000 for FY2022-23; $401,000 for FY2023-24; and $429,000 for FY2024-25. Funding for future years will be requested through the annual budget process.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Purchase Order Renewals meet the above criteria and are not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Jessica Huff, Recreation and Libraries Supervisor
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation and Libraries Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-218
Resolution 22-219
Resolution 22-220
Resolution 22-221
Resolution 22-222
RESOLUTION NO. 22-218

APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER RENEWAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF

LIBRARY MATERIALS
WHEREAS, a purchase order renewal for the purchase of library materials, between the City of Roseville and Baker & Taylor, LLC, has been reviewed by the Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order renewal approved.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that two (2) additional one (1) year renewals are hereby approved without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 22-219

APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER RENEWAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF

LIBRARY MATERIALS
WHEREAS, a purchase order renewal for the purchase of library materials, between the City of Roseville and Bibliotheca, LLC, has been reviewed by the Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order renewal approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 22-220

APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER RENEWAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF

LIBRARY MATERIALS
WHEREAS, a purchase order renewal for the purchase of library materials, between the City of Roseville and Ingram Library Services, LLC, has been reviewed by the Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order renewal approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 22-221

APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER RENEWAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF

LIBRARY MATERIALS
WHEREAS, a purchase order renewal for the purchase of library materials, between the City of Roseville and Midwest Tape, LLC, has been reviewed by the Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order renewal approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 22-222

APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER RENEWAL FOR THE PURCHASE OF

LIBRARY MATERIALS
WHEREAS, a purchase order renewal for the purchase of library materials, between the City of Roseville and Overdrive, Inc., has been reviewed by the Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order renewal approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2142
File #: 0704-01 & 0201-01
Title:

Mahany Tennis Courts Renovation Project – Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Joel De Jong 916-774-5924 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.3.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the Council authorize a budget adjustment of $111,499 to be provided by the Roseville Joint Unified High School District to the Mahany Tennis Courts Renovation Project (500243), award the Mahany Tennis Courts Renovation project to the apparent low bidder, DRYCO Construction, Inc., adopt a resolution to authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement with DRYCO Construction, Inc. in the amount of $943,267, and authorize staff to approve change order requests in an amount not to exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract amount.

BACKGROUND
The Mahany Tennis Courts are located at the Mahany Park site located at Pleasant Grove Boulevard and Woodcreek Oaks Boulevard. The tennis court renovation project includes removal and replacement of the six (6) existing tennis courts’ paving and subgrade, installation of a vertical moisture barrier, concrete curbing around the perimeter of the courts, new posts and nets, and new top color coating and striping. In order to meet budget constraints, two additive alternatives were identified. These include modifications to the landscape and irrigation adjacent to the tennis courts to create non-irrigated buffer areas around the courts, and a grouted cobble pavement in these modified areas.

City Council approved the plans and specifications and authorized the call for bids at the April 20, 2022 meeting. Bids were opened on May 17, 2022 and staff received three bids. The bid results and architect’s estimate are as follows:

Bidder Grand Total Bid Price
DRYCO Construction, Inc. $ 943,267
Martin General Engineering, Inc. $1,105,000
Biondi Paving $1,189,511
Architect's Estimate $ 982,300
Staff recommends award of the project to DRYCO Construction, Inc., in the amount of $943,267 for the base bid and both additive alternatives.

The overall construction budget, including all soft costs plus contingency, is $1,111,499.

CONTINGENCY
During the course of a construction project, it is common to encounter unanticipated or changed conditions in the field which necessitate additions or other changes to the project and the contract.

Staff requests authorization to approve change order requests in an amount not to exceed ten (10%) of the contract price in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for the renovation project is provided through the FY2020-21 General Fund surplus funds by a budget adjustment approved by Council at the May 18, 2022 meeting. Per the current joint use agreement, Roseville Joint Unified High School District is to contribute to capital costs and/or repairs equal to a fair share based on use of a facility/amenity. This includes both hard and soft costs. In this case, the District’s fair share use of the tennis courts is 10%, therefore, the District is providing funds in the amount of $111,499. Maintenance of the existing citywide park is provided by the General Fund and will remain unchanged.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Respectfully Submitted,
Joel De Jong, Park Development Project Manager
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation and Libraries Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-224
Mahany Tennis Courts Contract
Ordinance 6506
Budget Adjustment
Vicinity Map
Bid Summary
RESOLUTION NO. 22-224

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND DRYCO CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, an Agreement regarding the Mahany Tennis Courts Renovation project, by and between the City of Roseville and DRYCO Construction, Inc., has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville, as well as any addenda or documents necessary to fulfill its purpose.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager, or his designee, is authorized to approve change orders for the project, consistent with the contract terms, provided that the net cost of all change orders shall not exceed ten percent (10%) of the contract price.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

ORDINANCE NO. 6506

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCALYEAR 2021-22

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2021-22, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Mahany Tennis Courts Renovation project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville, this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
5/31/20222:28 PM
1 REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Tara Gee, Parks Planning & Development Superinte FISCAL YEAR: 2021-22 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Kathy Cullen, Management Analyst II COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 6/15/22 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Parks, Recreation & Libraries ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
3130 6587 84001 500243 111,499
111,499

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
3130 4780 84001 500243 111,499
111,499
-

FUND BALANCE
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
-
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD / DESIGNEE DATE BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / DESIGNEE DATE CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

POSTED BY DATE
Revised: June 24, 2019
TOTAL
TOTAL

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
Increase to budget for Mahany Tennis Court Renovation project

NET ADJUSTMENT

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
10% share of Mahany Tennis Court Renovation project paid by RJUHSD
REQUIRED APPROVALS:

BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

The Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department is requesting a budget adjustment of $111,499.00 to the Mahany Tennis Courts Rehabilitation project budget. The project cost has increased as the result of bids coming in higher than initial estimates. The project budget increase is offset by revenue of $111,499.00 from the Roseville Joint Union High School District for their share of the project. There is no net impact to the Parks Recreation and Library Capital fund.

ACCOUNT STRING
TOTAL

DESCRIPTION
05/31/2022

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2153
File #: 0900-04-02
Title:

Washington Boulevard at All America City Boulevard Roundabout Project - Award of Contract and Budget Adjustment
Contact: Karen Vences 916-774-5412 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.4.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that City Council:

1. Adopt a resolution awarding the Washington Boulevard at All America City Boulevard Roundabout Project to Martin Brothers Construction, and authorizing the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville. Staff also requests authorization for the City Manager or designee to approve change orders of up to 10% as a construction contingency; and

2. Adopt an ordinance approving a budget adjustment in the amount of $7,120,297 funded by Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement funds, Local Transportation Funds (LTF), Highway Users Tax (HUT) funds, Traffic Mitigation Fee (TMF) funds, and Environmental Utility Water Rehabilitation Funds.

BACKGROUND
The Washington Boulevard at All America City Boulevard Roundabout Project was identified as a mitigation measure in the Placer County Sports and Event Complex Project EIR in 2018 to address impacts to the intersection of Washington Boulevard/All America City Boulevard/Lincoln Street.

Washington Boulevard is an arterial roadway (originally part of old Hwy 65) that extends from Central Roseville to the northern City Limit and is one of the main connections to the City’s Historic and Downtown regions. The roundabout project limits currently include Washington Boulevard, a five-lane arterial, intersected by collector roadways All America City Boulevard on the west, and Lincoln Street to the east.

The proposed roundabout will maintain the multi-lane configuration for the north and southbound directions, while reducing the intersecting collector streets to a single approach and departure from All America City Boulevard, and an exit to Lincoln Street. This project will improve the intersection safety, accessibility for bicyclists and pedestrians, and corridor aesthetics, while also reducing vehicle emissions. Improvements to aesthetics include landscaping and a railroad themed urban design featuring a water tower within the center of the roundabout.

On September 1, 2021 the City Council approved the plans and specifications for the project and authorized staff to call for bids. One bid was received and opened on April 5, 2022. The single bid and Engineer’s Estimate are shown below. The single bid came in approximately $961,000 above the Engineer’s Estimate. The higher than expected bid can be attributed to the escalated prices of materials due to a post-COVID-19 improving economy, including rising costs due to high-demand material shortages and supply chain limitations. Staff reached out to non-bidding contractors to determine their reasoning for not submitting a bid, and the overall response was that the contractors are currently too busy with other work and were not able to complete a bid for this project. The City determined that re-advertising the project would likely not result in any additional bids, and would likely bring increased costs and potential postponement of work. Thus, it was determined it is in the City's best interest to award the single bidder, Martin Brothers Construction.

Bid Summary
Bidder’s Name Amount
Engineer’s Estimate $4,096,753.00
Martin Brothers Construction $5,057,740.70
It is anticipated construction will begin in July of 2022 and be completed by summer of 2023. The Washington Boulevard corridor can expect temporary shoulder closures, lane closures, and detours during construction. Most of the work will be scheduled to occur during normal working hours, with the possibility of some night work, based on the contractor’s work and traffic operations.

PUBLIC OUTREACH
Public Works staff will be working closely with Public Affairs & Communications staff to keep the community informed of the project’s benefits, progress, and traffic impacts during the construction phase of the project. Residents and businesses will be updated about the project through a variety of methods including, but not limited to: local news media, signage, social media, web, and email notifications.

FISCAL IMPACT

CONSTRUCTION OF PROJECT
The project construction is fully funded by:
$5,270,426 - Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Grants (CMAQ); $630,000 - Local Transportation Funds (LTF) - these are matching funds to the CMAQ grant;
$450,000 - Traffic Mitigation Fee (TMF) - this represents the value of alternative intersection control improvements (traffic signal) identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) that will no longer be needed due to construction of the project; $439,871 - Highway Users Tax (HUT) Funds - this represents the value of pavement and sidewalk maintenance that will no longer be needed due to construction of the project; and $330,000 - Environmental Utility Water Rehabilitation Funds - this is the value of waterline relocation work included within the project.

The recommended budget adjustment totaling $7,120,297 will fully fund construction, construction contingency, staff time, permit fees, and construction management.

Currently, CMAQ grant funds include $2,000,000 of obligated funds, $2,900,000 of funds that are programmed and not yet awarded (obligation is anticipated Fall of 2022 or Spring of 2023), and $370,426 of funds currently programmed for another project that are in the process of being transferred, programmed, and awarded to this project (obligation anticipated Fall of 2022 or Spring of 2023). In the unlikely event the anticipated CMAQ funds are not obligated to the project, staff will return to council with a recommended alternative funding source.

No General Fund resources will be used for construction of this project.

IMPACT OF MAINTENANCE COSTS FOR LANDSCAPING
This project includes landscaping improvements along the corridor that will require maintenance by the City's Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department (PRL) that are expected to be approximately $3,600/year. It is anticipated the PRL operating budget for landscape maintenance in the General Fund will increase by an estimated $3,600 with the citywide budget process beginning the fiscal year after project completion, as a result of this project.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Council approval of bid documents for Washington Boulevard All America City Boulevard Roundabout Project is an action that is subject to CEQA. Project level CEQA compliance for the Washington Boulevard All America City Boulevard Roundabout project was accomplished with preparation of the Washington Boulevard at All America City Boulevard (WAAC) Roundabout Project Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (Adopted: January 20, 2021) (SCH:
2020100313). Because the Washington Boulevard All America City Boulevard Roundabout project is consistent with the project evaluated in the Washington Boulevard at All America City Boulevard (WAAC) Roundabout Project Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, no new effects would be expected to occur and all applicable mitigation measures from the Washington Boulevard at All America City Boulevard (WAAC) Roundabout Project Final Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration will be implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Karen Vences, Assistant Engineer
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-234
WAAC Roundabout Location Map
WAAC Roundabout Agreement - Martin Brothers
Ordinance 6507
Budget Adjustment
RESOLUTION NO. 22-234

APPROVING AN AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND

MARTIN BROTHERS CONSTRUCTION, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, an Agreement regarding the Washington Boulevard at All America City Boulevard Roundabout Project, by and between the City of Roseville and Martin Brothers Construction, has been reviewed by the City Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Agreement is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville, as well as any addenda or documents necessary to fulfill its purpose.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
I80
E I80 W
HWY 65 S
HWY 65 N

CIRBY WY

ROSEVILLE PW

VERNON ST

WASHINGTON BL

DOUGLAS BL

JUNCTION BL

SUNR SI E AV

ATKINSON ST

R VI ERS DI E AV

BASELINE RD

INDUSTRIAL AV

HARDING
BL
TAYLOR
RD

MCANALLY DR

PLEASANT GROVE BL

CHURCH ST
O

AK R DI GE DR

COUNTRY CLUB
DR

LEAD HILL BL

RESERVE
D
R

VINEYARD RD

BERRY ST

FAIRWAY DR

ATLANTIC ST

ORLANDO AV

MELODY LN

GIBSON DR

FOLSOM RD

FOOTHILLS BL

HALLISSY
D
R

MAIN ST

HIGHLAND PARK DR

EUREKA RD

ROSEVILLE RD
N

SUNRISE
AV

TRESTLE RD

STANFORD

RANCH RD
OAK ST

PAINTED DESERT DR
G

ALLERIA BL

N GRANT ST

WILLS RD

R O SEVILLE PW

ROSEVILLE
PW
Washington Blvd. & All America City Blvd.

Roundabout Project - Location Map
S:\Arcdata\publicworks\CIP\WAAC RAB Location Map.mxd Date Saved: 4/12/2019 12:06:24 PM [ 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 500
Feet

PROJECT LOCATION
[L:\agreement\form agreements\Project Manuals\project manual agreement - federal funds.docx; 3/8/2022]

AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this _____day of __________________, 20_____, by and between the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation, (“CITY”), and ______________________________________________, a ____________________________, (“CONTRACTOR”); and
W I T N E S S E T H:

WHEREAS, the City Council of the CITY, at a meeting held on the _____day of __________________, 20_____, approved plans and specifications for the _________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ and directed the City Clerk to advertise for sealed proposals for doing said work and providing that bids be submitted on the _____ day of ________________, 20_____; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk, thereafter duly and regularly caused a notice to be published in the manner and for the time prescribed by law; and
WHEREAS, CONTRACTOR, pursuant to the provisions of said notice duly filed a bid with the City Clerk, a true copy of which bid is now on file in the office of the City Clerk, and is hereby referred to and by this reference made a part hereof as fully as if set forth at length herein; and
WHEREAS, all bids received pursuant to said notice were opened and examined and publicly declared at the time specified in said advertisement for bids and at a meeting of the City Council held on the _____ day of ___________________, 20_____, the Council found and Martin Brothers Construction Corporation
1st
September 21
5th April 22
15th June 22
Washington Blvd. at All America City Blvd. Roundabout Project

ORDINANCE NO. 6507

ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
AUTHORIZING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE FISCALYEAR 2021-22

BUDGET AND DECLARING THIS ORDINANCE TO BE IMMEDIATELY

EFFECTIVE AS AN APPROPRIATION MEASURE
THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ORDAINS:

SECTION 1. The City of Roseville Annual Budget, Fiscal Year 2021-22, is hereby amended as listed on the attached budget adjustment for the Washington Boulevard at All America City Boulevard Roundabout project.

SECTION 2. This ordinance is hereby declared to be an appropriation measure, immediately effective pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.03 of the Charter.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville, this _ day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

REQUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUSTMENT
REQUESTER NAME & TITLE: Karen Vences, Assistant Engineer FISCAL YEAR: 2021-22 PREPARER NAME & TITLE: Karen Vences, Assistant Engineer COUNCIL DATE (if applicable): 6/15/2022 DEPARTMENT/DIVISION: Public Works / Engineering ORDINANCE:

EXPENDITURES/EXPENSES/TRANSFERS OUT
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
3201 6587 84001 500070 2,000,000
3201 6587 84001 500070 2,900,000
3201 6587 84001 500070 370,426
6520 6587 84001 500070 300,000
6520 5080 84001 500070 330,000
2305 6587 84001 500070 439,871
3151 6587 84001 500070 300,000
3151 5080 84001 500070 150,000
6130 6587 84001 500070 323,000
6130 5080 84001 500070 7,000
7,120,297

REVENUES/TRANSFERS IN
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
3201 4401 84001 500070 2,000,000
3201 4401 84001 500070 2,900,000
3201 4401 84001 500070 370,426
6520 4425 84001 500070 630,000
5,900,426
1,219,871

FUND BALANCE
BUDGET ($)
Fund Account Center Project Adjustment
2305 3601 00000 (439,871)
3151 3601 00000 (450,000)
6130 3601 00000 (330,000)
(1,219,871)
Justification for Budget Adjustment:

Fund 3201 - Roadway - $5,270,426 Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Grant funds Fund 6520 - Transportation - $630,000 in Local Transportation Funds (LTF) Revenue Fund 2305 - Highway Users Tax (HUT) Fund Balance - $439,871 Fund 3151 - Traffic Mitigation Fund Balance - $450,000
Fund 6130 - Water Rehabilitation Fund Balance - $330,000

REQUESTING DEPARTMENT HEAD / DESIGNEE DATE BUDGET MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER / DESIGNEE DATE CITY MANAGER / DESIGNEE DATE

POSTED BY DATE
CMAQ Grant Funding - AC'd, future obligation
CMAQ Grant Funding - To be AC'd and obligated
CMAQ Grant Funding - obligated, project CML-5182(079)
BUDGET DEPARTMENT USE ONLY:

REQUIRED APPROVALS:

The existing budget for 500070 - Washington Blvd All American Roundabout is $634,576. This budget adjustment is requested to increase the project budget by $7,120,297; for a revised project budget of $7,754,873. This budget adjustment establishes funding for construction, construction management, biologist, mitigation, permits, and design construction support. Funding requested is as follows:

CMAQ grant funds include $2,000,000 of obligated CMAQ funds, $2,900,000 of programmed CMAQ funds not yet awarded (obligation anticipated Fall 2022 or Spring 2023), and $370,426 of CMAQ funds originally intended for a different project that will be transferred to this project (obligation anticipated Fall 2022 or Spring 2023).

Establish budget for project construction - CMAQ future obligation Establish budget for project construction - CMAQ to be AC'd TOTAL
TOTAL

DESCRIPTION
Reduce Water Rehabilitation Fund balance

ACCOUNT STRING
TOTAL
Local Transportation Fund - SB 325
Establish budget for staff time

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
Reduce Highway Users Tax Fund balance
Reduce Traffic Mitigation Fund balance
Establish budget for project construction - CMAQ obligated Establish budget for project construction

NET ADJUSTMENT

ACCOUNT STRING DESCRIPTION
Establish budget for staff time
Establish budget for project construction
Establish budget for project construction
Establish budget for staff time
Establish budget for project construction
5/26/20224:52 PM
1 COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2143
File #: 0704-02
Title: Open Space and Preserve Land Goat Grazing - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Eric Dexter 916-746-1769 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.5.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Recommend Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract purchase agreement with Ecosystem Concepts, Inc. for grazing of land for vegetation management and fire prevention on City owned properties.

Additionally, authorize the City Manager to execute the remaining renewal years without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

BACKGROUND
The City of Roseville open space land consists of both preserves and general open space. Since 2007, the Parks Division has incorporated the use of goats to graze nearly 1,700 acres of land.

The City’s preserves are governed by the Open Space Preserve Overarching Management Plan approved by federal agencies. One requirement of the plan is to perform thatch management within preserves. Additionally, the Fire Department and the residents of Roseville are in support of the use of goats for vegetation management.

In March 2022 a Request for Proposals (RFP-13-105) was issued for grazing of open space and preserve lands. Three companies submitted proposals and were evaluated by staff from the Parks Division. Ecosystem Concepts Inc. was selected based on experience, understanding of the project and the ability to complete the project in a timely manner.

FISCAL IMPACT
The one (1) year base term of this agreement, with the option of five (5) additional one (1) year extensions, will not exceed annual budgeted amounts. The amount of the agreement for FY2022- 23 is $431,000; FY2023-24, $471,818; FY2024-25, $484,595; FY2025-26, $498,296; FY2026- 27, $512,408: and FY2027-28, $526,943. Funding is budgeted in the Open Space and Preserve Funds, as well as the General Fund with funding from the local Measure B sales tax.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves minor alteration in the condition of the land, water, and or vegetation which will not remove healthy, mature scenic trees. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 4 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15304). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Respectfully Submitted,
Eric Dexter, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Superintendent Jill Geller, Director of Parks, Recreation and Libraries _____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-225
CPA Grazing FY22-23
RESOLUTION NO. 22-225

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND ECOSYSTEM CONCEPTS, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3002231) for goat grazing of land for vegetation management and fire prevention on City owned properties, between the City of Roseville and Ecosystem Concepts, Inc., has been reviewed by the Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it and all other related documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute five (5) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2147
File #: 0203-03
Title: Sodium Hydroxide (BACC 12-2022) - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Becky Philipp 916-774-5724 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.6.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a contract purchase agreement (3002064) with Univar Solutions USA, Inc. as the lowest responsive bidder for Bay Area Chemical Consortium (BACC) Bid No. 12-2022 for the supply and delivery of sodium hydroxide solution for the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant, Barton Road Water Treatment Plant, and the Roseville Energy Park, and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

Staff further requests authorization to continue utilizing the remaining optional renewal years of the bid contract without further Council approvals until the contract expires or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest.

BACKGROUND
The wastewater treatment plants, the water treatment plant and the Roseville Energy Park have ongoing requirements for sodium hydroxide solution (caustic soda), which is used in the water treatment purification process to adjust pH and reduce corrosion in the distribution systems. The chemical will be purchased as needed throughout the year.

In February 2022, the City participated in a regional chemical bid led by the Bay Area Chemical Consortium (BACC), with the Bay Area Clean Water Agency serving as the coordinating agency.

BACC is comprised of water and wastewater agencies in the Northern California area, working together to purchase chemicals by combining bid solicitations. BACC is an informal cooperative that advertises and opens sealed competitive bids and then prepares bid recommendations.

Combined bid solicitations offer vendors an opportunity to sell greater quantities of their products.

Because more than 50 public agencies are now participating, significant savings for chemical purchases are being passed along to the agencies’ water and wastewater customers.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated annual cost for FY2022-23 is $1,011,000. Funding is included in the Environmental Utilities and Electric Departments’ proposed FY2022-23 budgets. Projected spending for the optional renewal years is as follows: FY2023-24, $1,061,500; FY2024-25, $1,114,000; FY2025- 26, $1,170,000.

Hazardous material transport consistent with applicable safety regulations should not result in a significant environmental effect. Therefore, the proposed Contract Purchase Agreement does not include the potential for significant environmental effect and is not subject to CEQA.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Respectfully Submitted,
Becky Philipp, Buyer
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer _____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-228
3002064 Univar Solutions_Sodium Hydroxide
RESOLUTION NO. 22-228

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THECITY OF ROSEVILLE AND UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OFROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3002064) for the purchase of sodium hydroxide solution for the Dry Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant, Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant, Barton Road Water Treatment Plant, and the Roseville Energy Park, between the City of Roseville and Univar Solutions USA, Inc., has been reviewed by the Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it and all other related documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute three (3) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2148
File #: 0203-03
Title: Sodium Hypochlorite (BACC 13-2022) - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Becky Philipp 916-774-5724 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.7.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a contract purchase agreement (3002203) with Univar Solutions USA, Inc. as the lowest responsive bidder for Bay Area Chemical Consortium (BACC) Bid No. 13-2022 for the supply and delivery of 12.5% sodium hypochlorite for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant, Water Treatment Plant, Roseville Energy Park, Environmental Utilities' wells and the Roseville Aquatics Complex, and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
The Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant, Barton Road Water Treatment Plant, Roseville Energy Park, Environmental Utilities' wells and Roseville Aquatics Complex have ongoing requirements for 12.5% sodium hypochlorite (chlorine), which is used to sanitize the water in swimming pools and is required for use as a disinfectant at the plants. This chemical will be purchased as needed throughout the year.

In February 2022, the City participated in a regional chemical bid led by the Bay Area Chemical Consortium (BACC), with the Bay Area Clean Water Agency serving as the coordinating agency.

Combined bid solicitations offer vendors an opportunity to sell greater quantities of their products.

Because more than 50 public agencies are now participating, significant savings for chemical purchases are being passed along to the agencies’ water and wastewater customers.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated annual cost is $672,000. Funding is included in the Environmental Utilities, Roseville Electric, and Parks, Recreation and Libraries Departments’ proposed FY2022-23 budgets. Projected spending for the optional renewal years is as follows: FY2023-24, $706,000; FY2024-25, $740,800; FY2025-26, $778,000.

Description
Resolution 22-229
3002203 Univar Solutions USA, inc
RESOLUTION NO. 22-229

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THECITY OF ROSEVILLE AND UNIVAR SOLUTIONS USA, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OFROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3002203) for the purchase of 12.5% sodium hypochlorite solution for the Pleasant Grove Wastewater Treatment Plant, Water Treatment Plant, Roseville Energy Park, and Aquatics Complex, between the City of Roseville and Univar Solutions USA, Inc., has been reviewed by the Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it and all other related documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2128
File #: 0203-03
Title: Liquid Aluminum Sulfate (BACC 01-2022) - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Becky Philipp 916-774-5724 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.8.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution to approve a contract purchase agreement (3002245) with Chemtrade Chemicals US LLC as the lowest responsive bidder for Bay Area Chemical Consortium (BACC) Bid No. 01-2022 for the supply and delivery of liquid aluminum sulfate for the City's water treatment plant, and authorize the City Manager to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BACKGROUND
The City's water treatment plant has an ongoing requirement for liquid aluminum sulfate (liquid alum) which is used as a flocculating agent in the water purification process. This chemical will be purchased as needed throughout the year.

In February 2022, the City participated in a regional chemical bid led by the Bay Area Chemical Consortium (BACC), with the Bay Area Clean Water Agency serving as the coordinating agency.

Combined bid solicitations offer vendors an opportunity to sell greater quantities of their products.

Because more than 50 public agencies are now participating, significant savings for chemical purchases are being passed along to the agencies’ water and wastewater customers.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated annual cost is $175,000. Funding is included in the Environmental Utilities Department's proposed FY2022-23 budget for the Water Operations Fund. Projected spending for the optional renewal years is as follows: FY2023-24, $180,000; FY2024-25, $185,000; FY2025-26, $190,000.

Hazardous material transport consistent with applicable safety regulations should not result in a significant environmental effect. Therefore, the proposed contract purchase agreement does not include the potential for significant environmental effect and is not subject to CEQA.

Description
Resolution 22-209
3002245 Chemtrade Chemical LLC
RESOLUTION NO. 22-209

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY

OF ROSEVILLE AND CHEMTRADE CHEMICALS US LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3002245) for the supply and delivery of liquid aluminum sulfate, between the City of Roseville and Chemtrade Chemicals US LLC, has been reviewed by the Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it and all other related documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2116
File #: 0203-04
Title: Aggregate Products (RFQ 10-3323) - Purchase Orders Contact: Sue Jessup 916-746-1702 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.9.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends City Council approve purchase orders with Hastie’s Capitol Sand & Gravel and Triangle Rock Products, LLC as the lowest responsive and responsible bidders for the purchase of aggregate products in response to RFQ 10-3323.

The bid allowed for four optional renewal years at one-year intervals. Staff requests City Council adopt resolutions authorizing staff to continue utilizing the remaining optional renewal years without further Council approvals, pending approval of the budget by City Council each year, until the contract expires or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City's best interest.

BACKGROUND
Various City operations, including the Public Works Department's Streets Division, the Environmental Utilities (EU) Department's Water and Wastewater Divisions, the Parks, Recreation & Libraries Department (PRL), and the Electric Department have ongoing requirements for aggregate products. Some of the major requirements for the aggregate products include top dressing turf fields, crushed gravel for drainage, sand for mixing concrete, pipe support, backfilling of trenches, road improvements, and pole replacements.

Bidders were asked to quote thirteen types of different aggregate products, including round rock, crushed rock, sand, soil, and concrete, with the bid being awarded on a line item by line item basis.

A formal bid was issued, and the vendor responses are listed on the attached bid summary sheet.

FISCAL IMPACT
The estimated total annual spend is $175,000 for FY2022-23. Funding is included in the Public Works Department’s General Fund, Gas Tax Fund, and Highway Users Tax Fund budgets; PRL’s General Fund and various CFD/LLD fund budgets; Environmental Utilities Department’s budgets in the Water and Wastewater Operations Funds; and the Electric Department’s budget in the Electric Fund.

Spending for future renewals will be contingent upon Council approval of budgets. Estimated spending for the optional renewal years is as follows: FY2023-24, $186,715; FY2024-25 $199,785; FY2025-26 $213,770; FY2026-27 $228,734.

The purchase of aggregate products meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Sue Jessup, Buyer
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer _____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-197
Resolution 22-198
Bid Summary
RESOLUTION NO. 22-197

APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER FOR THE PURCHASE OF AGGREGATE PRODUCTS

ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS
WHEREAS, a purchase order for the purchase of aggregate products on an as-needed basis, between the City of Roseville and Hastie’s Capitol Sand & Gravel, has been reviewed by the Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that four (4) additional one (1) year renewal is hereby approved without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest, and upon receipt and approval of bonds by the City Attorney’s office.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 22-198

APPROVING A PURCHASE ORDER FOR THE PURCHASE OF AGGREGATE PRODUCTS

ON AN AS-NEEDED BASIS
WHEREAS, a purchase order for the purchase of aggregate products on an as-needed basis, between the City of Roseville and Triangle Rock Products, LLC, has been reviewed by the Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said purchase order is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
Line Item Type Size Est. Quantity (Ton) New Est. Quantity (Ton) Capital Sand & Gravel Vulcan - Roseville Triangle Rock Prod @ Sacramento Triangle Rock Prod
@ Ione/Amador
1 ROUND ROCK
1A Drain Rock 1-1/2" x 2-1/2" 20 50 33.31 N/A N/A N/A
1B Rip-Rap Rock 4 x 12 200 250 40.21 N/A N/A 33.20
1C Pea Gravel 3/8" 200 250 23.49 N/A 27.75 30.70
2 CRUSHED ROCK
2A Regular 1/2" 500 1400 24.32 N/A 26.75 N/A
2B Regular 3/4" 1,200 150 24.32 42.75 26.75 30.20
2C AB Class II Road Rock 3/4" 470 700 23.24 26.75 25.95 24.75 3 SAND
3A Concrete Sand 450 450 25.4 N/A 27.75 N/A
3B Fill Sand Washed 320 300 25.4 N/A 24.25 N/A
3C PG and E Sand 10 10 25.4 N/A 24.25 N/A
3D Fairway Topdressing 500 500 42.23 N/A N/A N/A
4 SOIL
4A Top Soil 75 100 25.99 N/A N/A N/A
5 Concrete
5A Concrete Mix 1" 300 125 28.06 N/A N/A N/A
5B Concrete Mix 3/8" 12 12 28.93 N/A N/A N/A
Cost per Ton Delivered
FY 2022/23 (7/1/22 - 6/30/23)

AGGREGATE PRODUCTS
Bid Summary Review

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2150
File #: 0203-02
Title: Tires (RFQ 10-3322) – Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Tiffany Valdez 916-774-5708 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.10.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution to approve a contract purchase agreement (3002144) with Fleet Tire, Inc. dba Brannon Tire for the purchase and repair of tires and authorize the City Manager to execute it.

This bid allowed for four optional renewal years at one-year intervals. Staff requests authorization to continue renewing the contract without further Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, until the contract expires, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

BACKGROUND
The Fleet Services Division has a recurring demand for a variety of tires to maintain the City’s vehicle fleet. The tires and related services will be purchased on an as-needed basis throughout the year.

Bidders were asked to quote a representative sampling of the tires that Fleet Services typically orders on a regular basis, and the bid required bidders to provide their percentage discount off the manufacturer's list price for any items not listed on the pricing worksheet to allow the City to add new tires to the list or replace discontinued ones.

A formal bid was issued with the following vendor responses:

Vendor Total
Fleet Tire, Inc. $328,001.04
Stockton, CA
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company $333,312.78
Akron, OH
Morgan Tire of Sacramento $361,858.61
Sacramento, CA
East Bay Tire Co. $444,525.73
Sacramento, CA

FISCAL IMPACT
The total estimated value of the award is $450,000. Funding is included in the proposed Fleet Services Fund FY2022-23 budget. Spending for future renewals will be contingent upon Council approval of budgets. Projected spending for the optional renewal years is as follows: FY2023-24, $473,000; FY2024-25, $497,000; FY2025-26, $521,000; FY2026-27, $547,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The purchase of tires meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Respectfully Submitted,
Tiffany Valdez, Buyer
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer _____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-231
RESOLUTION NO. 22-231

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND FLEET TIRE, INC. DBA BRANNON TIRE, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3002144) for the purchase and repair of tires on an as-needed basis, between the City of Roseville and Fleet Tire, Inc. dba Brannon Tire, has been reviewed by the Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it and all other related documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute four (4) additional one (1) year renewals without further City Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, or until City staff determines that continuing with the same vendor is not in the City’s best interest.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2152
File #: 0203-05
Title:

Very High Frequency Radio System Support - Sole Source Contract Purchase Agreement
Contact: Karl Grover 916-774-5145 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.11.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends Council adopt a resolution to approve a Contract Purchase Agreement with Silke Communications for two years of enhancement and support on the Very High Frequency (VHF) radio system and authorize the City Manager to execute it.

BACKGROUND
The VHF radio system is used by the Fire and Police Departments to enable personnel to communicate with other agencies during daily interactions as well as significant mutual aid incidents. In addition, the VHF system is used as a method for Fire Station alerting and as a backup to the 800MHz radio system.

This contract is sole sourced as Silke Communications is in the process of updating Fire and Police interoperability radio systems with engineered work and there are additional efforts needed to complete the update process. Also, this work must be provided by Silke Communications to remain under manufacturer warranty.

The support coverage is from July 1, 2022 through June 30, 2024. The contract is based on time and materials and will not exceed $150,000.

FISCAL IMPACT
Support and maintenance of the VHF system is budgeted in the proposed FY2022-23 Information Technology Operations Fund budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. A contract purchase agreement for VHF system support meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Karl Grover, IT Program Manager - Network Infrastructure Hong Sae, Chief Information Officer
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-233
Signed CPA #3002339
RESOLUTION NO. 22-233

APPROVING A SOLE SOURCE CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND

BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SILKE COMMUNICATIONS SOLUTIONS, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a sole source contract purchase agreement (3002239) for very high frequency (VHF) radio system support, between the City of Roseville and Silke Communications Solutions, Inc., has been reviewed by the Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said sole source contract purchase agreement is approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2144
File #: 0203-04
Title: Paving and Striping Services - Contract Purchase Agreement Contact: Darci Carpenter 916-727-5702 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.12.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a contract purchase agreement (3002225) with Sierra Striping, Inc., to provide paving and striping services at various City locations.

Staff requests authorization to utilize the four (4) optional one (1) year renewals of the contract without further Council approval, provided that the applicable budget is approved by the City Council each year, until the contract expires or until Staff determines that continuing with the same vendor in not in the city’s best interest.

BACKGROUND
The Public Works Department released a Request for Proposals (RFP 01-048) for Paving and Striping Services in March of 2022 to solicit proposals to provide the City with striping and paving services on an as-needed basis at various City locations. Three (3) proposals were received and, after careful review and rating of each proposal, staff recommends awarding a service agreement to Sierra Striping Inc., for on-call and as-needed paving, striping, repairs and services.

The intent of the City is to enter into a five-year agreement, with an initial one-year period and four optional renewal years, with the selected vendor.

FISCAL IMPACT
The value of the initial agreement is $200,000 for FY2022-23. Funding for this agreement is included in the proposed FY2022-23 budget in the Facility Services and Facility Rehabilitation funds. The funds will be encumbered one year at a time pending budget approval each year.

Funding for the optional renewal years is as follows: FY2023-24 $225,000; FY2024-25 $250,000; FY2025-26 $275,000; and FY2026-27 $300,000.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves repair and maintenance of existing facilities. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines Section 15301). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services.

Respectfully Submitted,
Darci Carpenter, Adminstrative Technician
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-226
Signed CPA
RESOLUTION NO. 22-226

APPROVING A CONTRACT PURCHASE AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND SIERRA STRIPING, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY

MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a contract purchase agreement (3002225) to provide paving and striping services and repairs on an as needed basis at various City locations, between the City of Roseville and Sierra Striping, Inc., has been reviewed by the Council; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it and all other related documents on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2132
File #: 0203-01
Title: Vehicle Purchases – Purchase Orders
Contact: Brian Craighead 916-774-5731 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.13.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
RFQ 10-3325
Staff recommends City Council approve a purchase order to A-Z Bus Sales Inc. for two (2) Toyota Sienna vans with ADA accessibility utilizing RFQ 10-3325 to replace Fleet ID 14-288 and 14-289 approved in the FY2021-22 Transit Fund budget. The total cost, including options and sales tax, is $152,898.

RFQ 10-3326
Staff recommends City Council approve a purchase order to American Truck and Trailer Body Company, Inc. (ATTB) for two (2) Streetlight pole trailers utilizing RFQ 10-3326 to replace Fleet ID 87-665 and 96-682 approved in the FY2021-22 Electric Fund budget. The total cost, including options and sales tax, is $114,918.

BACKGROUND
RFQ 10-3325
The Public Works Alternative Transportation division is purchasing two Toyota Sienna vans with ADA accessibility as replacements for Fleet ID 14-288 and 14-289. The City’s Transit Contractor (MV Transportation) uses these vans in transit operations to transport lunch relief drivers to designated locations and for road supervisor oversight of transit operations in the field. In addition, the vans require ADA accessibility as they are also used as backup vehicles for dial-a-ride services.

A formal bid was issued with the following vendor response:

Vendor Total Price
A-Z Bus Sales $152,897.50
Colton, CA
RFQ 10-3326
The Roseville Electric Construction and Maintenance division is purchasing two trailers for streetlight poles as replacements for Fleet ID 87-665 and 96-682. The trailers are used by operations staff to transport streetlight poles, bases, and globes to and from job sites. On average, each new subdivision requires 20-30 streetlights to be transported to the site. The trailers are also utilized to perform streetlight maintenance and replacements.

A formal bid was issued with the following vendor responses:

Vendor Total Price
American Truck and Trailer Body *$57,458.77 ($57,325.45) Tracy, CA
Utility Equipment & Supply $154,660.04
Tolleson, AZ
*After staff reviewed the bids, it was discovered that the low bidder made mathematical errors when calculating their grand total as noted above by the asterisk. The bid result was not impacted and American Truck and Trailer Body is still the lowest bidder. The bid requested individual pricing for the trailers and Utility Equipment & Supply bid two trailers for their Total Price.

Vehicle replacements are based on the Fleet Scoring System, which considers factors such as age, mileage, reliability, prior maintenance and repair costs, and current condition. Below are the vehicle replacement scores. A score of 23 or more indicates the vehicle is eligible for replacement.

Vehicle ID Replacement Score Vehicle Condition
14-288 24 Meets City replacement criteria
14-289 24 Meets City replacement criteria
87-665 43 Meets City replacement criteria
96-382 34 Meets City replacement criteria

FISCAL IMPACT
RFQ 10-3325
The total cost of two (2) Toyota Sienna vans with ADA accessibility, including options and sales tax, is $152,898. Funding is included in the FY2021-22 Transit Fund budget.

RFQ 10-3326
The total cost of two (2) streetlight pole trailers, including options and sales tax, is $114,918.

Funding is included in the FY2021-22 Electric Fund budget.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The purchase of vehicles meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Respectfully Submitted,
Brian Craighead, Fleet Manager
Jason Shykowski, Public Works Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2113
File #: 0400-04-18
Title: Campus Oaks CO-6 Subdivision - Notice of Completion Contact: Danny Jacobo 916-223-7486 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.14.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Campus Oaks CO-6 Subdivision, CWJ#190461 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

BACKGROUND
The Engineering Division has made a final inspection of the above project and has found the roadway infrastructure work complete in accordance with the improvement plans and City specifications.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Danny Jacobo, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-195
Exhibit A Location Map
NOC Document
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-195

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Campus Oaks CO-6 Subdivision PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO

EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Campus Oaks CO-6 Subdivision is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book FF of Maps, Page 68 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 20 , by the following vote on rollcall:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

ROSEVILLE PW
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Campus Oaks
CO-6 Subdivision
Project
Location
0 500 1,000
Feet

BLUE OAKS

FIDDYMENT F
O
O
T
H
LI L
S

WASHING
T
O
N

ROSEVIL LE

PLEASANT GROVE

FAIRWAY
Vicinity Map

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was completed and
accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is
situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.
___________________________________
City of Roseville
Owner
ATTEST:
________________________________ _
Carmen Avalos, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the
of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

___________________________________

City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this _____ day of ,
20___,
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.
____________________________________
Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2139
File #: 0400-04-09-1
Title: Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6 Backbone Project - Notice of Completion Contact: Darin Crockett 916-751-9196 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.15.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6 Backbone, CWJ # 190624, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Darin Crockett, Senior Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-217
Exhibit A - Location Map
NOC
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-217

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6 Backbone PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND

DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6 Backbone is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. A portion of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final map of Fiddyment Ranch-Phase 3 Village F-6 recorded in Book FF of Maps, Page 75 , in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Fiddyment Ranch-Phase 3 Village F-6 Backbone

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 20 , by the following vote on rollcall:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

HOLT PW

N HAYDEN PW

CRAWFORD PW

BLUE OAKS BL
WES
T
PARK
D
R
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3
Villages F-6 Backbone
Project
Location
0 0.25 0.5
Miles

BLUE OAKS
WES
TBRO
O
K
FIDD
Y
M
ENT
Vicinity Map

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

NOTICE OF COMPLETION
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the public work of improvement known as the Project was
completed and accepted by the City of Roseville on . The location is situated in the City of Roseville, County of Placer, State of California and is indicated on the attached map, marked as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. The real property herein described is owned by the City of Roseville, 311 Vernon Street, Roseville CA 95678.

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

The surety on said project was
.

ATTEST:

Marc Stout
City Engineer
City of Roseville
Owner
_
Sonia Orozco, City Clerk
State of California )
County of Placer )
I, Marc Stout , being first duly sworn, depose and say: I am the City Engineer of the City of Roseville, a municipal corporation in the State of California, owner of the property described in the above Notice. I am duly authorized to make this verification for and on behalf of the City of Roseville. I have read the Notice of Completion and know its contents and the facts stated therein are true.

Marc Stout
City Engineer
City of Roseville
State of California )
County of Placer )
Subscribed and sworn to (or affirmed) before
me on this day of ,
2021, MarcStout
proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the person(s) who appeared
before me.

Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above Signature of Notary Public A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document.

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2025
File #: 0400-04-09-1
Title: Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6C1 - Notice of Completion Contact: Darin Crockett 916-751-9196 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.16.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6C1, CWJ#190637 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

Description
Resolution 22-207
Exhibit A - Location Map
NOC
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-207

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6C1 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND

AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID

NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6C1 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book FF of Maps, Page 91 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2021, by the following vote on rollcall:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

HOLT PW N HAYD
EN P
W

BLUE OAKS BL

CRAWFORD PW
H
AYD
E
N PW
W

ESTPARK
DR
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3
Village F-6C1
Project
Location
0 0.25 0.5
Miles
SAN
TUCCI

BLUE OAKS

WESTBROOK

FIDDYMENT PLEASANT GROVE
Vicinity Map

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

___________________________________

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2126
File #: 0400-04-09-1
Title: Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6C2 - Notice of Completion Contact: Darin Crockett 916-751-9196 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.17.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6C2, CWJ#190647 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

Description
Resolution 22-208
NOC
Exhibit A - Location Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-208

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6C2 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING

THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF

ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3 Village F-6C2 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book FF of Maps, Page 90 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 2021, by the following vote on rollcall:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

___________________________________

BLUE OAKS BL

HOLT PW

CRAWFORD PW

N HAYDEN
PW
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Fiddyment Ranch - Phase 3
Village F-6C2
Project
Location
0 0.25 0.5
Miles

SANTUCCI

BLUE OAKS
W
EST
B
ROO
K

FIDDYMENT

PLEASANT GROVE
Vicinity Map

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2130
File #: 0400-04-12-1
Title: Market Street - Segment 4 - Notice of Completion Contact: Cody Allen 916-517-7598 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.18.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Market Street - Segment 4, CWJ # 190570, as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Cody Allen, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-211
Exhibit A: Location Map
NOC Market Street - Segment 4
Final Map-CGB
Final Map-DF
RESOLUTION NO. 22-211

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS Market Street – Segment 4 PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO

EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND

ACCEPTING A PORTION OF THE DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Market Street – Segment 4 is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. A portion of the right-of-way and easements offered for dedication on the final maps of Sierra Vista - CGB recorded in Book EE of Maps, Page 56 and Sierra Vista DF Properties, INC. Recorded in Book FF of Maps, Page 21, in the office of the recorder of Placer County, is hereby accepted by the City in part as said dedications relates to the improvement plan set known as Market Street – Segment4.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this day of , 20 , by the following vote on rollcall:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK
M
A
R
K
E
T
ST

VISTA GRANDE BL
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Sierra Vista
Market Street - Segment 4
Project
Location
0 0.25 0.5
Miles

BLUE OAKSFIDDYMENT
W
E
S
T
BROO
K

SANTUCCI

BASELINE

VISTA GRANDE

PLEASANT GROVE

JUNCTION
Vicinity Map

BASELINE RD

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

___________________________________

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2119
File #: 0400-04-12-1
Title: Sierra Vista Village KT-2A - Notice of Completion Contact: Troy Galvin 916-223-7441 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.19.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Sierra Vista Village KT-2A, CWJ# 190095 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Troy Galvin, Construction Inspector
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-201
NOC
Exhibit A - Location Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-201

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE KT-2A PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND

DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Sierra Vista Village KT-2A is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book FF of Maps, Page 2 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City ofRoseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this 15th day of June, 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

___________________________________

STBROOK
B
L

VISTA GRANDE BL
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Sierra Vista Village
KT-2A
Project
Location
0 0.25 0.5
Miles

BLUE OAKSFIDDYMENT
W
EST
BROO
K

SANTUCCI

BASELINE

VISTA GRANDE

PLEASANT GROVE

JUNCTION
Vicinity Map

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2120
File #: 0400-04-12-1
Title: Sierra Vista Village KT-3A - Notice of Completion Contact: Troy Galvin 916-223-7441 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.20.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Sierra Vista Village KT-3A, CWJ# 190076 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

Description
Resolution 22-202
NOC
Exhibit A - Location Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-202

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE KT-3A PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND

DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Sierra Vista Village KT-3A is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book EE of Maps, Page 99 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City ofRoseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this 15th day of June, 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

___________________________________

STBROOK
B
L

VISTA GRANDE BL
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Sierra Vista Village
KT-3A
Project
Location
0 0.25 0.5
Miles

BLUE OAKSFIDDYMENT
W
EST
BROO
K

SANTUCCI

BASELINE

VISTA GRANDE

PLEASANT GROVE

JUNCTION
Vicinity Map

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2021
File #: 0400-04-12-1
Title: Sierra Vista Village KT-3B - Notice of Completion Contact: Troy Galvin 916-223-7441 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.21.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Sierra Vista Village KT-3B, CWJ# 190081 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

Description
Resolution 22-203
NOC
Exhibit A - Location Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-203

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE KT-3B PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND

DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Sierra Vista Village KT-3B is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer County Recorder’s Office Book EE of Maps, Page 100 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City ofRoseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this 15th day of June, 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

___________________________________

STBROOK
B
L

VISTA GRANDE BL
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Sierra Vista Village
KT-3B
Project
Location
0 0.25 0.5
Miles

BLUE OAKSFIDDYMENT
W
EST
BROO
K

SANTUCCI

BASELINE

VISTA GRANDE

PLEASANT GROVE

JUNCTION
Vicinity Map

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2022
File #: 0400-04-12-1
Title: Sierra Vista Village KT-5A - Notice of Completion Contact: Troy Galvin 916-223-7441 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.22.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting Sierra Vista Village KT-5A, CWJ# 190073 as complete and authorizing the City Engineer to execute the Notice of Completion.

FISCAL IMPACT
The actions requested as part of this action have no impact to the City's General Fund.

Construction costs were paid by the developer.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a Notice of Completion meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

Description
Resolution 22-204
NOC
Exhibit A - Location Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-204

RESOLUTION OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE ACCEPTING THE PUBLIC WORK KNOWN AS SIERRA VISTA VILLAGE KT-5A PROJECT, APPROVING THE "NOTICE OF COMPLETION", AND AUTHORIZING AND

DIRECTING THE CITY ENGINEER TO EXECUTE SAID NOTICE ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE, THEREFORE, AND ACCEPTING ALL DEDICATIONS OFFERED ON THE RECORDED MAP OF THE SUBDIVISION.

BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville as follows:

1. The "Notice of Completion" on file in the City Clerk's Department relative to that public work known as the Sierra Vista Village KT-5A is hereby approved and the public work accepted.

2. All rights of way and easements as offered on the final map of recorded with Placer CountyRecorder’s Office Book FF of Maps, Page 3 is hereby accepted.

3. The City Engineer is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Notice on behalf of the City ofRoseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville, this 15th day of June, 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

CITY CLERK

RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN
RECORDED MAIL TO:

CITY CLERK

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
311 VERNON STREET
ROSEVILLE, CA 95678
Exempt from recording fees
Pursuant to Gov’t Code §27383

The direct/general contractor on said project was .

___________________________________

M
ARK
E
T
ST

VISTA GRANDE BL
Exhibit A: Location Map
City of Roseville
Sierra Vista Village
KT-5A
Project
Location
0 0.25 0.5
Miles

BLUE OAKSFIDDYMENT
W
EST
BROO
K

SANTUCCI

BASELINE

VISTA GRANDE

PLEASANT GROVE

JUNCTION
Vicinity Map

BASELINE RD

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2135
File #: 0400-04-12-1 & 0400-07
Title: Sierra Vista Village FD-06 - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Contact: Kerry Andrews 916-774-5346 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.23.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept on behalf of the public the public easements offered thereon, and accept subject to improvement, Lots B, C, and D and the rights of way offered thereon.

2. Adopt the attached resolution approving the Subdivision Agreement and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.

BACKGROUND
The Development Services, Engineering section has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance, and all conditions of the tentative map have been met. This map will create 95 residential lots, 1 private street (Lot A), and 3 public landscape lots.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Approval of the Sierra Vista Village FD-6 final map is an action that is subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project level CEQA compliance for the Sierra Vista Village FD-6 final map was accomplished with preparation of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR (Adopted: May 5, 2010) (SCH#2008032017) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program approved by the City of Roseville on June 6, 2012.

Because the Sierra Vista Village FD-6 final map is consistent with the project evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), no new effects would be expected to occur, and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Kerry Andrews, Assistant Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-213
SubdivisionAgreement
Vicinity Map
Final Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-213

APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND JOHN MOURIER CONSTRUCTION, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE

CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE WHEREAS, a subdivision agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and John Mourier Construction, Inc., for the Sierra Vista Village FD-06 subdivision, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2137
File #: 0400-04-12-1 & 0400-07
Title: Sierra Vista Village FD-24 - Phase 1 - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Contact: Edward Winston 916-774-5432 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.24.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept on behalf of the public the public easements offered thereon.

2. Adopt the attached resolution approving the Subdivision Agreement and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.

BACKGROUND
The Development Services, Engineering section has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance, and all conditions of the tentative map have been met. This map will create 105 residential lots, 1 private street (Lot A), 2 private pedestrian access and drainage lots, and 1 private landscape lot.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Approval of the Sierra Vista Village FD-24 Phase 1 final map is an action that is subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project level CEQA compliance for the Sierra Vista Village FD-24 Phase 1 final map was accomplished with preparation of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR (Adopted: May 5, 2010) (SCH#2008032017) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program approved by the City of Roseville on June 6, 2012. Because the Sierra Vista Village FD-24 Phase 1 final map is consistent with the project evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), no new effects would be expected to occur, and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Edward Winston, Associate Engineer
Mike Isom, Development Services Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-215
SubdivisionAgreement
Final Map
Vicinity Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-215

APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND FD-24, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a subdivision agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and FD-24, LLC, for the Sierra Vista Village FD-24, Phase 1 subdivision, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2138
File #: 0400-04-12-1 & 0400-07
Title: Sierra Vista Village FD-24 - Phase 2 - Final Map and Subdivision Agreement Contact: Kerry Andrews 916-774-5346 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.25.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council take the following actions:

1. Approve the final map on file with the City Clerk and accept on behalf of the public the public easements offered thereon, and accept subject to improvement, Lots C and D and the rights of way offered thereon.

2. Adopt the attached resolution approving the Subdivision Agreement and authorizing the City Manager to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.

BACKGROUND
The Development Services, Engineering section has reviewed the subject final map and found that it is in compliance with the Subdivision Map Act and the City's Subdivision Ordinance, and all conditions of the tentative map have been met. This map will create 30 residential lots, 2 private street lots (Lots A and B), and 2 public landscape lots.

FISCAL IMPACT
There is no fiscal impact to the City's General Fund associated with this approval.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Approval of the Sierra Vista Village FD-24 Phase 2 final map is an action that is subject to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project level CEQA compliance for the Sierra Vista Village FD-24 Phase 2 final map was accomplished with preparation of the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR (Adopted: May 5, 2010) (SCH#2008032017) and the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program approved by the City of Roseville on June 6, 2012. Because the Sierra Vista Village FD-24 Phase 2 final map is consistent with the project evaluated in the Sierra Vista Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR), no new effects would be expected to occur, and all applicable mitigation measures from the Sierra Vista Specific Plan EIR will be implemented. As such, no additional CEQA action is required at this time.

Description
Resolution 22-216
SubdivisionAgreement
Final Map
Vicinity Map
RESOLUTION NO. 22-216

APPROVING A SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT, BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND FD-24, LLC, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO

EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a subdivision agreement, by and between the City of Roseville and FD-24, LLC, for the Sierra Vista Village FD-24, Phase 2 subdivision, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said agreement is approved and the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2117
File #: 0214 & 0716
Title: California State Library Zip Books - Grant Award Contact: Jessica Huff 916-774-5905 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.26.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Recommend City Council adopt a resolution to accept a $12,000 grant award from the California State Library to be used towards the continuation of the Zip Books program in all three (3) Roseville libraries.

BACKGROUND
The California State Library has awarded a $12,000 grant to the Parks, Recreation and Libraries (PRL) department to be used for the continuation of the Library’s current Zip Books program. The program supplements the recurring requirement for materials for public use in all three (3) libraries and online. PRL was initially awarded a grant in FY 2019-20 to begin the Zip Books program. The Zip Books program provides library users with speedy access to books that are not available at the Roseville libraries. A patron simply requests the item from the library, the library purchases it from Amazon, and the book is shipped directly to the patron’s home. When finished, the patron returns it to the library, and the library adds it to the collection. Because Zip Books is a user-driven program, the library collection becomes more closely matched to the needs of the local community. Zip Books began as a pilot project in 2011, funded by a Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) grant from the California State Library. The program has proved to be extremely popular with libraries and library users throughout the state and has grown substantially over the past decade, with 89 California libraries currently participating.

FISCAL IMPACT
Funding for Zip Books is included in PRL's FY2021-22 budget in the General Fund. The not-toexceed amount is $12,000 for FY2021-22. The library plans to apply for grants from the California State Library for continued funding of the program in future years.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. The California State Library Zip Books Grant Award meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal E - Deliver exceptional City services
Respectfully Submitted,
Jessica Huff, Recreation and Libraries Supervisor
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation and Libraries Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-199
California State Library Zip Books Grant Award Letter
RESOLUTION NO. 22-199

ACCEPTING A GRANT AWARD FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY ON

BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, the City of Roseville’s Parks, Recreation and Libraries Department was awarded a $12,000 grant by the California State Library to be used towards the continuation of the Zip Books program in all three (3) Roseville libraries; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Roseville that as the grant recipient, the City of Roseville agrees to comply with all conditions and requirements related to conduct for the award; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Roseville accepts the grant award from the California State Library.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
Library – Courts Building 916-323-9759
P.O. Box 942837 [email protected]
Sacramento, CA 94237-0001 www.library.ca.gov
February 02, 2022
Natasha Martin, MLIS
City of Roseville
225 Taylor Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Dear Ms. Natasha Martin, MLIS:

We are pleased to approve the grant application for the Zip Books Grant project for a total of $12,000 in California Library Services Act funds.

Hard copies of this correspondence will not follow. Keep the entirety of the correspondence for your files and consider these award materials your original documents. For more information, please refer to the Zip Book Guidelines located on the State Library website.

Upon receipt of a completed claim form that is free of errors or inaccurate information, the State Library processes it for routing to the Office of the State Controller which ultimately issues the check. The total time for the claim form to be processed, routed, payment issued, and mailed can be up to eight weeks, but is often a shorter timeframe.

If you still have not received payment after eight weeks, please contact your grant monitor.

The Grant Monitor assigned to your project is Monica Rivas. She is available to assist you throughout the year and she can be reached via email at [email protected].

Please stay in touch with your Grant Monitor throughout the award period. Read the enclosed award packet thoroughly and contact your Grant Monitor if you have any questions.

Best wishes for a successful project.

Respectfully yours,
Greg Lucas
California State Librarian
Cc: Monica Rivas, [email protected]
Lena Pham, [email protected]
Margaret Thordsen, MLIS, [email protected]
DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
THE BASICS – YOUR GRANT AWARD
The following provides all the basic information about your grant and managing your grant.

Award #: ZIP21-87
Library/Organization: City of Roseville
Project Title: Zip Books
Award Amount: $12,000
Start Date: July 1, 2021
End Date: June 30, 2022
Please understand that it can take from six to eight weeks before grant funds are delivered.

If you have not received your payment after eight weeks, please contact your grant monitor.

REPORTING
Zip Books participants are required to provide mid-project financial and narrative reports as outlined in the grant terms and conditions (April 30, 2022); final financial and narrative reports by July 31, 2022; and updates upon request. Reports will be submitted to your grant monitor, Monica Rivas, by email at [email protected].

PAYMENTS
Please note this clarification regarding payments. Grant payments will be made based on the payment schedule laid out in the Grant Term and Award Documentation. Ten percent (10%) of the full grant award is withheld until the end of the project period. It is payable only if the grant recipient fulfills all project reporting requirements and expends all funds, or returns all unspent grant funds, by the time specified in the grant terms and conditions.

CONTACT
We want your project to be successful. Please work with the grant monitor and project consultant in implementing your project:

Grant Monitor: Monica Rivas
Monitor Phone Number: (916) 603-7159
Monitor Email Address: [email protected]
Project Consultant Lena Pham
Consultant Email Address [email protected]
DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process

STATE FUNDED GRANTS

AWARD AGREEMENT AND

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 1 of 26 ends

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT SUMMARY 2

PROCEDURES AND REQUIRMENTS
A. Term of the Agreement 3
B. Scope of Work 3
C. Budget Detail 3
D. Narrative and Financial Reports 4
E. Claim Form and Payment 4
EXHIBIT A: TERMS AND CONDITIONS 7
EXHIBIT B: CERTIFICATION AND COMPLIANCE FORM 21
Certification 24
EXHIBIT C: STATE REIMBURSABLE TRAVEL EXPENSES 26
DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 2 of 26 ends

PROJECT SUMMARY
AWARD AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE STATE LIBRARY and City of Roseville for the Zip Books project.

AWARD AGREEMENT NUMBER
This Award Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into on July 1, 2021, by and between the California State Library (“State Library”) and City of Roseville; Parks Recreation and Libraries, (“Grantee”).

This Award Agreement pertains to Grantee’s State-funded Zip Books project.

The Library Development Services Bureau (“LDS”) of the State Library administers state and federal funds in the form of awards.

The Grantee was selected by the State Library to receive state grant funds in the amount of $12,000 through the process adopted by the State Library in administering such grants.

The State Library and the Grantee, for the consideration and under the conditions hereinafter set forth in the Grant Agreement, agree as follows:

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 3 of 26 ends

PROCEDURES and REQUIREMENTS
A. Term of the Agreement
The Grant term begins on the date of execution of the Agreement by both parties, until June 30, 2022. If completion of the project occurs prior to the end of the grant period, this will be the end date of the term of this agreement. Grant eligible program expenditures may begin no earlier than the start date. The project period ends on June 30, 2022, and all eligible program costs must be incurred by this date.

B. Scope of Work

1. Grantee agrees to perform all activities specifically identified in the Grantee’s application and submitted to the State Library in response to the Zip Books Project.

2. The following activities and deliverables to be performed by the Grantee include, but are not limited to the following:
• Maintain and keep records of expenditures related to the grant that are consistent with Generally Acceptable Accounting Practices (GAAP). • Make financial records available to the State Library upon request. • Work with the State Library staff to assure that funds are disbursed in compliance with the purpose of the grant.
• Prepare and submit required narrative and financial reports. • Procure equipment, and other supplies as needed for the project. • Issue contracts for services, personnel, and consultants as needed for the project.
• If applicable, make payments for services, including for hours worked and travel reimbursements, to consultants and contractors.
• Oversee the implementation of project activities.

C. Budget Detail
The State Library shall provide the Grantee funding for the expenses incurred in performing the Scope of Work and activities specified in the Grantee’s application. The Grantee shall request the distribution of grant funding consistent with its proposal and the budget worksheet that was included with the application. Under no circumstances shall payments exceed the total grant amount identified in this Agreement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 4 of 26 ends

D. Narrative and Financial Reports

1. The Grantee shall be responsible for submission of interim and final narrative and financial reports on the progress and activities of the project, to the California State Library, using the sample report documents provided by the California State Library.

2. All the reports must be current, include all required sections and documents, and must be approved by the Grant Monitor before any payment request can be processed. Failure to comply with the specified reporting requirements may be considered a breach of this Agreement and result in the termination of the Agreement or rejection of the payment request and/or forfeiture by the Grantee of claims for costs incurred that might otherwise have been eligible for grant funding. Any problems or delays must be reported immediately to the Grant Monitor. The financial reports shall reflect the expenditures made by the Grantee under the Agreement and may be incorporated into the same reporting structure as the narrative reports.

3. The reports shall be submitted by the following dates:

Reporting Period Report Due Date
Project start date –
March 31, 2022
1st Financial and Mid Project Program
Narrative Report Due
April 30, 2022
April 1, 2022- June
30, 2022
Final Financial Report, Expenditure Detail
Report and Final Program Narrative Report
Due
July 31, 2022

4. Failure to submit timely reports with the appropriate documentation by the due date may result in rejection of the payment request and/or forfeiture by the Grantee of claims for costs incurred that might otherwise have been eligible for grant funding.

5. The Grantee agrees to maintain records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this grant, subject to possible audit for a minimum of five (5) years after final payment date or grant term end date, whichever is later. Please refer to Exhibit A, Terms and Conditions for more information.

E. Claim Form and Payment

1. The California State Library shall provide the Grantee payment as outlined in the payment schedule only if all requirements for claiming the funds as outline in this document have been met, and only for those activities and costs specified in the approved award application.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 5 of 26 ends

2. The Grantee shall complete, sign, and submit Certification of Compliance form (Exhibit B) and the Financial Claim form (included in your award packet), to the California State Library within 14 days of receiving this award packet. These forms will be issued, signed, and submitted using the online signature and agreement platform, DocuSign, unless DocuSign is unallowable or inconsistent with practices and policies of the local jurisdiction. If the use of DocuSign is not acceptable to your organization, please contact your grant monitor regarding alternate options.

3. Any of the sums appearing under the categories in the approved budget may be adjusted with prior authorization from the California State Library Grant Monitor. This would be to increase the allotment with the understanding that there will be corresponding decreases in the other allotments so that the total amount paid by the California State Library to the Grantee under this Agreement shall not exceed the awarded amount, which shall be expended/encumbered during the grant period.

4. If the payment amount made by the California State Library exceeds the actual expenses incurred during the term of this Agreement, as reflected in the financial reports to be filed by the Grantee, the Grantee shall immediately refund the excess payment amount to the California State Library.

5. The Award payments will only be made to the Grantee. It is the Grantee’s responsibility to pay all contractors and subcontractors for purchased goods and services.

6. The Final Payment of 10% will be withheld and retained by the California State Library until all conditions agreed upon in this Agreement, including submission and grant monitor approval of the interim and final narrative and financial reports, have been satisfied.

7. Prompt Payment Clause
The California State Library will make payments to the Grantee in accordance with the Prompt Payment Clause under Government Code, section 927, et. seq.

The Grantee may typically expect payment within 45 days from the date a grant payment request is properly submitted and approved by the Grant Monitor.

8. Budget Contingency Clause
a. It is mutually agreed that if the Budget Act of the current fiscal year or any subsequent years covered under this Agreement does not appropriate sufficient funds for the program, this Agreement shall no longer be in full force and effect. In this event, the California State Library shall have no liability to pay any funds whatsoever to the Grantee or to furnish any other considerations under this Agreement and the Grantee shall not be obligated to perform any provisions of this Agreement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 6 of 26 ends

b. If funding for any fiscal year is reduced or deleted by the Budget Act for purposes of this Program, the California State Library shall have the option to either cancel this Agreement with no liability occurring to itself or offer an Agreement amendment to the Grantee to reflect the reduced amount.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 7 of 26 ends

EXHIBIT A: TERMS and CONDITIONS

1. Accessibility: The State is responsible for ensuring that public websites are accessible to both the general public and state employees, including persons with disabilities. Grantee shall assist the State in meeting its responsibility. Therefore, all project materials generated by state funded programs must meet the California Accessibility Standards. Additionally, all project materials designed, developed, and maintained shall be in compliance with the California Government Code, sections 7405 and 11135, and the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, or a subsequent version, as published by the Web Accessibility Initiative of the World Wide Web Consortium at a minimum Level AA success criteria.

However, if for some reason project material is not generated to be in compliance to meet these standards, please still submit it to the State Library. When submitting the material make sure to note that the material is not accessible by including “NOT ACCESSIBLE” in the file name.

The California State Library reserves the right to post project materials to its website that are in compliance with these standards.

2. Acknowledgment: The State of California and the California State Library shall be acknowledged in all promotional materials and publications related to the Statewide Broadband Services Program.
a. Grant award recipients must ensure that the State of California receives full credit as the source of funds and that the California State Library, likewise, is acknowledged as the administrator.
b. Publications and information releases about the project must credit the State of California. An appropriate statement for a publication or project press release is:
“This [publication/project] was supported in whole or in part by funding provided by the State of California, administered by the California State Library.”
Grantees must include the above statement in any publications, vehicle wraps, and promotional materials, including websites. If space is limited the State Library logo and the following shortened acknowledgement statement is acceptable:
“Funding provided by the State of California.”
DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 8 of 26 ends

c. This credit line on products of a project, such as materials, is important to foster support from the public, and state funding sources. d. California State Library Logo: Use of the California State Library logo, which can be downloaded on the California State Library website, is required on any publication, vehicle wrap, or promotional material along with the above statement(s).
e. Photo Documentation: Digital photos are a great way to document the happenings of your project. It is recommended that you use a photo release form when taking photos of the public. You may use your library’s photo release form or contact your grant monitor for the State Library’s form.

3. Agency: In the performance of this Agreement the Grantee and its agents and employees shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees, or agents of the California State Library. The Grantee is solely responsible for all activities supported by the grant. Nothing in this Agreement creates a partnership, agency, joint venture, employment, or any other type of relationship between the parties. The Grantee shall not represent itself as an agent of the California State Library for any purpose and has no authority to bind the State Library in any manner whatsoever.

4. Amendment: No amendment or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing, signed by the parties, and approved as required.

No oral understanding or agreement not incorporated into this Agreement is binding on any of the parties. This Agreement may be amended, modified, or augmented by mutual consent of the parties, subject to the requirements and restrictions of this paragraph.

5. Applicable law: The laws of the State of California shall govern all proceedings concerning the validity and operation of this Agreement and the performance of the obligations imposed upon the parties hereunder. The parties hereby waive any right to any other venue. The place where the Agreement is entered into and place where the obligation is incurred is Sacramento County, California.

6. Assignment, Successors, and Assigns: The Grantee may not assign this Agreement or delegate its performance to any third-party person or entity, either in whole or in part, without the California State Library’s prior written consent. The provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the California State Library, the Grantee, and their respective successors and assigns.

7. Audit and Records Access: The Grantee agrees that the California State Library, the Department of General Services, the State Auditor, or their designated representatives shall have the right to review, audit, inspect and copy any records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. The Grantee agrees to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of five (5) years after the final payment, or grant term end date, whichever is later, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated, or until DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 9 of 26 ends

completion of any action and resolution of all issues which may arise as a result of any litigation, dispute, or audit, whichever is later. The Grantee agrees to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records. Further, the Grantee agrees to include a similar right of the State to audit records and interview staff in any subcontract related to performance of this Agreement.

Examples of audit documentation may include, but not limited to, competitive bids, grant amendments, if any, relating to the budget or work plan, copies of any agreements with contractors or subcontractors if utilized, expenditure ledger, payroll register entries, time sheets, personnel expenditure summary form, travel expense log, paid warrants, contracts and change orders, samples of items and materials developed with grant funds, invoices and/or cancelled checks.

8. Authorized Representative: Grantee and the California State Library mutually represent that their authorized representatives have the requisite legal authority to sign on their organization’s behalf.

9. Communication: All communications from either party, including an interim check-in at any time during the grant term, shall be directed to the respective grant manager or representative of the California State Library or Grantee. For this purpose, the following contact information is provided below:

City of Roseville; Parks Recreation
and Libraries
Margaret Thordsen, MLIS
225 Taylor Street
Roseville, CA 95678
916-476-1206
[email protected]
California State Library
Monica Rivas
900 N Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
(916) 603-7159
[email protected]

1. Confidentiality: Grantee will maintain as confidential any material it receives or produces that is marked Confidential or is inherently confidential or is protected by privilege. Grantee agrees to alert the State Library to this status in advance, and State Library agrees to maintain this status in conformity with the Public Records Act.

2. Contractor and Subcontractors: Nothing contained in this Grant Agreement or otherwise shall create any contractual relation between the State and any contractor or subcontractors, and no contract or subcontract shall relieve the Grantee of his or her responsibilities and obligations hereunder. The Grantee agrees to be as fully responsible to the State for the acts and omissions of its contractors, subcontractors, volunteers, student interns and of persons either DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 10 of 26 ends

directly or indirectly employed by any of them as it is for the acts and omissions of persons directly employed by the Grantee. The Grantee’s obligation to pay its contractors and subcontractors is an independent obligation from the State’s obligation to make payments to the Grantee. As a result, the State shall have no obligation to pay or to enforce the payment of any monies to any contractor or subcontractor.

3. Copyright: Grantee owns and retains titles to any copyrights or copyrightable material from any original works that it creates within the scope of this Agreement in accordance with the federal Copyright Act. (17 U.S.C. 101, et seq.) Grantee is responsible for obtaining any necessary licenses, permissions, releases, or authorizations to use text, images, or other materials owned, copyrighted, or trademarked by third parties and for extending such licenses, permissions, releases, or authorizations to the California State Library pursuant to this section. Also, the California State Library may upload, post, or transmit copyrighted material produced or purchased with grant funds on a California State Library website for public access and viewing.

4. Discharge of Grant Obligations: The Grantee's obligations under this Agreement shall be deemed discharged only upon acceptance of the final report by California State Library. If the Grantee is a non-profit entity, the Grantee’s Board of Directors shall accept and certify as accurate the final report prior to its submission to California State Library.

5. Dispute Resolution: In the event of a dispute, Grantee will discuss the problem informally with the Grant Monitor. If unresolved, the Grantee shall file a written “Notice of Dispute” with the State Library Grant Monitor within ten (10) days of discovery of the problem. Within ten (10) days of receipt, the Grant Monitor shall meet with the Grantee for purposes of resolving the dispute. Any dispute arising under the terms of this Agreement which is not disposed of within a reasonable period of time, the Grantee may bring it to the attention of the State Librarian or the designated representative. The decision of the State Librarian or designated representative shall be final. Unless otherwise instructed by the Grant Monitor, the Grantee shall continue with its responsibilities under this Agreement during any dispute.

6. Drug-free Workplace: The Grantee certifies under penalty of perjury under the laws of California, that the Grantee will comply with the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 (Gov. Code, § 8350 et. seq.) and will provide a drug-free workplace by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations.
b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program to inform employees about all of the following:

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 11 of 26 ends

1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace.
2) The Grantee’s policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; 3) Any available counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs.
4) Penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
c. Require that every employee who works on the Agreement will:
1) Receive a copy of the Grantee’s drug-free workplace policy statement.
2) Agrees to abide by the terms of the Grantee’s statement as a condition of employment on the Agreement.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under the Agreement or termination of the Agreement or both and grantee may be ineligible for award of any future state agreements if the California State Library determines that the grantee has made a false certification or violated the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above.

7. Effectiveness of Agreement: This Agreement is of no force or effect until signed by both parties.

8. Entire Agreement: This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements, oral or written, made with respect to the subject hereof and, together with all attachments hereto, contains the entire agreement of the parties.

9. Exclusive Agreement: This is the entire Agreement between the California State Library and Grantee.

10. Extension: The State Librarian or designee may extend the final deadline for good cause. The Grantee’s request for an extension of the grant period must be made in writing and received by the California State Library at least 30 days prior to the final deadline.

11. Failure to Perform: The grant being utilized by the Grantee is to benefit the [insert phrase]. If the Grant Monitor determines the Grantee has not complied with this Agreement, the Grantee may forfeit the right to reimbursement of any grant funds not already paid by the California State Library, including, but not limited to, the ten percent (10%) withhold.

12. Federal and State Taxes: The State Library shall not:
a. Withhold Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA) payments from Grantee’s payments or make FICA payments on the Grantee’s behalf; or
b. Make Federal or State unemployment insurance contributions on Grantee’s behalf; or
c. Withhold Federal or State income taxes from Grantee’s payments DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 12 of 26 ends

Grantee shall pay all taxes required on payments made under this Agreement including applicable income taxes and FICA.

13. Force Majeure: Neither the California State Library nor the Grantee, its contractors, vendors, or subcontractors, if any, shall be responsible hereunder for any delay, default, or nonperformance of this Agreement, to the extent that such delay, default, or nonperformance is caused by an act of God, weather, accident, labor strike, fire, explosion, riot, war, rebellion, sabotage, flood, or other contingencies unforeseen by the California State Library or the Grantee, its contractors, vendors, or subcontractors, and beyond the reasonable control of such party.

14. Forfeit of Grant Funds and Repayment of Funds Improperly Expended: If grant funds are not expended, or have not been expended, in accordance with this Agreement, the State Librarian or designee, at his or her sole discretion, may take appropriate action under this Agreement, at law or in equity, including requiring the Grantee to forfeit the unexpended portion of the grant funds, including, but not limited to, the ten percent (10%) withhold, and/or to repay to the California State Library any funds improperly expended.

15. Fringe Benefit Ineligibility: Grantee agrees that neither the Grantee nor its employees and contract personnel are eligible to participate in any employee pension, health benefit, vacation pay, sick pay or other fringe benefit plan of the State of California or the State Library.

16. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles: The Grantee is required to use Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in documenting all grant expenditures.

17. Grant Monitor: The Grant Monitor’s responsibilities include monitoring grant progress and reviewing and approving Grant Payment Requests and other documents delivered to the California State Library pursuant to this Agreement.

The Grant Monitor may monitor Grantee performance to ensure Grantee expends grant funds appropriately and, in a manner, consistent with the terms and conditions contained herein. The Grant Monitor does not have the authority to approve any deviation from or revision to the Terms and Conditions (Exhibit A) or the Procedures and Requirements unless such authority is expressly stated in the Procedures and Requirements.

18. Grantee: the government or legal entity to which a grant is awarded, and which is accountable to the California State Library for the use of the funds provided. a. The grantee will make reports to the State Librarian in such form and containing such information as may be required to ensure the proper used of funds consistent with the grantee’s application and award agreement. The grantee will keep such records and afford such access as DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 13 of 26 ends

the California State Library may find necessary to assure the correctness and verification of such reports.

19. Grantee Accountability: The Grantee is ultimately responsible and accountable for the manner in which the grant funds are utilized and accounted for and the way the grant is administered, even if the Grantee has contracted with another organization, public or private, to administer or operate its grant program. In the event an audit should determine that grant funds are owed to the California State Library, the Grantee is responsible for repayment of the funds to the California State Library.

20. Grantee Funds: It is mutually agreed that the Grantee is responsible for furnishing funds beyond the grant award that may be necessary to complete the project.

21. Independent Action: Grantee reserves the right to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement in an independent manner, at any location and at any time within the agreed-upon timeline. Grantee’s employees or contract personnel shall perform all services required by this Agreement, but their time need not be devoted solely to fulfilling obligations under this Agreement. Grantee shall furnish all equipment and materials used to meet its obligations and complete the Project. The State Library shall not provide any personnel or other resources beyond the grant award and is not required to provide training in connection with this Agreement.

22. Indemnification: Grantee agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless the State of California, the California State Library and its officers, employees, and agents, from any and all claims, losses, and liabilities accruing or resulting to any and all contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, laborers and any other person, firm or corporation furnishing or supplying work services, materials, or supplies in connection with the performance of this Agreement, and from any and all claims and losses accruing or resulting to any person, firm or corporation who may be injured or damaged by Grantee in the performance of this Agreement.

23. License to Use: The California State Library reserves a fully paid-up, royalty-free, nonexclusive, sub-licensable and irrevocable license to reproduce, publish, prepare derivative works, distribute, or otherwise use, and to authorize third parties to use, any material received or maintained by Grantee in connection with this Agreement. This includes intellectual property, with or without thirdparty rights. All such usages will be for public library and State governmental purposes:
a. The copyright in any work developed under this grant, sub-grant, or contract under this grant or sub-grant; and
DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 14 of 26 ends

b. Any rights of copyright to which a Grantee, sub-grantee, or a contractor purchases ownership with grant support.

24. Limitation of Expenditure: Expenditure for all projects must conform to the grantee’s approved budget and with applicable State laws and regulations. The total amount paid by the California State Library to the Grantee under this agreement shall not exceed $12,000 and shall be expended/encumbered in the designated award period.

During the award period, the grantee may find that the awarded budget may need to be modified. Budget changes, requests for additional funds, or requests for reductions in award funding must be discussed with the assigned State Library Grant Monitor and a Grant Award Modification may be required to be submitted according to the instructions. Approval is by the State Librarian or their designee. Adjustments should be reported on the next financial report. Any adjustments in approved budgets must be documented and documentation retained in project accounts.

25. Lobbying: Grantee confirms that the grant funds will not be used for the purposes of lobbying or otherwise attempting to influence legislation, as those purposes are defined by the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986.

26. Non-Discrimination Clause: During this grant period, the Grantee and the Grantee’s contractors, and subcontractors shall not unlawfully discriminate, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical disability, mental disability, medical condition, genetic information, marital status, sex, age, sexual orientation, or military and veteran status. Grantee shall insure that the evaluation and treatment of contractors, employees and applicants for employment are free from such discrimination and harassment.

Additionally, Grantee, contractors, and subcontractors, if applicable, shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code §12900 et seq.), the regulations promulgated thereunder (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §11000 et seq.), the provisions of Article 9.5, Chapter 1, Part 1, Division 3, Title 2 of the Government Code (Gov. Code §§ 11135-11139.5), and the regulations or standards adopted by the California State Library to implement such article.

Grantee shall permit access by representatives of the Department of Fair Employment and Housing and the California State Library upon reasonable notice at any time during the normal business hours, but in no case less than 24 hours’ notice, to such of its books, records, accounts, and all other sources of information and its facilities as said Department or the California State Library shall require ascertaining compliance with this clause. Grantee, and its contractors, and subcontractors shall give written notice of their obligations DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 15 of 26 ends

under this clause to labor organizations with which they have a collective bargaining or other agreement. (See Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, §11105.) Grantee shall include the non-discrimination and compliance provisions of this clause in all contracts and subcontracts to perform work under the Agreement.

27. Notices: All notices and other communications in connection with this Agreement shall be in writing, and shall be considered delivered as follows:
a. Electronic Mail (E-mail): When sent by e-mail to the last e-mail address of the recipient known to the party giving notice. Notice is effective upon transmission.
b. DocuSign (e-signature platform): When sent via DocuSign a notification will be sent to the last e-mail address of the recipient known to the party giving notice. Notice is effective upon transmission.
c. Grants Management System: When sent via / uploaded to the California State Library’s Grants Management System a notification will be sent to the last e-mail address of the recipient known to the party giving notice.

Notice is effective upon transmission.
d. Personally: When delivered personally to the recipient’s physical address as stated in this Agreement.
e. U.S. Mail: Five days after being deposited in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, and addressed to recipient’s address as stated in this Agreement.

28. Order of Precedence: The performance of this Agreement shall be conducted in accordance with the Terms and Conditions, Procedures and Requirements, Certificate of Compliance, Project Summary, Activities Timeline, and Budget, of this Agreement, or other combination of exhibits specified on the Grant Agreement Coversheet attached hereto (collectively referred to as “Terms”).

Grantee’s California State Library-approved Application (Grantee’s Application) is hereby incorporated herein by this reference. In the event of conflict or inconsistency between the articles, exhibits, attachments, specifications, or provisions that constitute this Agreement, the following order of precedence shall apply:
a. Grant Agreement Coversheet and any Amendments thereto b. Terms and Conditions
c. Procedures and Requirements
d. Certificate of Compliance
e. Project Summary
f. Grantee’s Application (including Budget and Activities Timeline) g. All other attachments hereto, including any that are incorporated by reference.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 16 of 26 ends

29. Payment:
a. The approved Budget, if applicable, is attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference and states the maximum amount of allowable costs for each of the tasks identified in the Project Summary and Activity Timeline included in the project application. California State Library shall provide funding to the Grantee for only the work and tasks specified in the Grantee’s Application at only those costs specified in the Budget and incurred in the term of the Agreement.
b. The Grantee shall carry out the work described in the Work Plan or in the Grantee’s Application in accordance with the approved Budget and shall obtain the Grant Monitor’s written approval of any changes or modifications to the Work Plan, approved project as described in the Grantee’s Application, or the approved Budget prior to performing the changed work or incurring the changed cost. If the Grantee fails to obtain such prior written approval, the State Librarian or designee, at his or her sole discretion, may refuse to provide funds to pay for such work or costs. c. The Grantee shall request funds in accordance with the funding schedule included in this agreement.
d. Ten percent (10%) will be withheld from the Payment Request (if applicable) and paid at the end of the grant term, when all reports and conditions stipulated in this Agreement have been satisfactorily completed. Failure by the grantee to satisfactorily complete all reports and conditions stipulated in this Agreement may result in forfeiture of any such funds withheld.
e. Lodgings, Meals and Incidentals: Grantee’s eligible costs are limited to the amounts authorized in the California State Administrative Manual (see Exhibit C or contact the Grant Monitor for more information). f. Payment will be made only to the Grantee.
g. Reimbursable expenses shall not be incurred unless and until the grantee receives a Notice to Proceed as described in the Procedures and Requirements.

30. Personal Jurisdiction: The Grantee consents to personal jurisdiction in the State of California for all proceedings concerning the validity and operation of this Agreement and the performance of the obligations imposed upon the parties.

Native American Tribal grantees expressly waive tribal sovereign immunity as a defense to any and all proceedings concerning the validity and operation of this Agreement and the performance of the obligations imposed upon the parties.

31. Personnel Costs: Any personnel expenditures to be paid for with grant funds must be computed based on actual time spent on grant-related activities and on the actual salary or equivalent hourly wage the employee is paid for their DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 17 of 26 ends

regular job duties, including a proportionate share of any benefits to which the employee is entitled.

32. Pledge: This Agreement shall not be interpreted to create any pledge or any commitment by the State Library to make any other or further grants or contributions to Grantee, or any other person or entity in connection with the Project. It is mutually agreed that Grantee is responsible for furnishing funds beyond the grant award that may be necessary to complete outcomes or deliverables.

33. Privacy Protection: Both parties agree to protect the confidentiality of any nonpublic, personal information that may be contained in materials received or produced in connection with this Agreement, as required by Civil Code, section 1798, et. seq.

34. Prohibited Use: The expenditure under this program shall not be used to supplant Grantee efforts in other grant programs provided by the California State Library.

35. Public Records Act: Material maintained or used by the California State Library is considered “public record” under the Public Records Act (PRA) at Government Code, sections 6250, et. seq. This includes the Interim and Final reports, and any other written communications between the parties. Grantee agrees to ensure that all content contained in its written reports are appropriate for publication.

Said material, along with all other reports, documentation and data collected during the term of the Agreement, will be subject to disclosure unless it qualifies for exemption under the PRA in whole or in part. Grantee agrees to alert the State Library as to a basis for exemption if any exists.

36. Publicity Obligations: Grantee will notify the State Library of any promotional materials or publications resulting from the grant no later than five (5) days in advance of distribution, whether they are print, film, electronic, or in any other format or medium. Copies of all promotional materials will be provided to the State Library. Grantee will acknowledge the State Library’s support as noted above. Grantee agrees that the State Library may include information about this grant and its outcomes in its own annual reports, with specific reference to Grantee, and may distribute such information to third parties.

37. Records: Communications, grant related documents, data, original receipts, and invoices must be maintained by Grantee and shall be made available to the State Library upon request. Grantee agrees to maintain adequate grant program records and adequate financial records consistent with generally accepted accounting practices, and to retain all records for at least five (5) years after the end-of-term. The State Library may monitor or conduct an onsite DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 18 of 26 ends

evaluation of Grantee’s operation to ensure compliance with this Agreement, with reasonable advance notice.

38. Reduction of Waste: In the performance of this Agreement, Grantee shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that materials purchased or utilized in the course of the project are not wasted. Steps should include, but not be limited to: the use of used, reusable, or recyclable products; discretion in the amount of materials used; alternatives to disposal of materials consumed; and the practice of other waste reduction measures where feasible and appropriate.

39. Reimbursement Limitations: Under no circumstances shall the Grantee seek reimbursement pursuant to this Agreement for a cost or activity that has been or will be paid for through another funding source. The Grantee shall not seek reimbursement for any costs used to meet cost sharing or matching requirements of any other California State Library funded program.

40. Reports and Claims: It is the responsibility of the grantee make the required reports and claims to the California State Library.
a. The grantee shall be responsible for submitting to the State Library Narrative Reports detailing progress and activities. The reports are due on the dates specified in the reporting schedule detailed in the Procedures and Requirements section.
b. The grantee shall be responsible for submitting to the State Library Financial Reports reflecting grantee expenditure activity. The reports are due on the dates specified in the reporting schedule detailed in the Procedures and Requirements section.
c. To obtain payment hereunder the grantee shall submit authorized claims provided by the State Library for that purpose, on each of the following mentioned dates for payment, and the California State Library agrees to reimburse the Library as soon thereafter as State fiscal procedures will permit.
d. The final 10% of the grant award (if applicable) is payable only upon approval of all final reports and receipt of claim form. Failure to provide timely reports is a serious breach of an award recipient’s administrative duty under the award.
e. Payment will be provided to cover the expenditures incurred by the grantee for the project in the following manner:
o $10,800 upon execution of the agreement and submission of claim by the grantee organization.
o The final ten percent (10%) payment will be made upon approval of all final reports and receipt of claim form in the amount of $1200.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 19 of 26 ends

41. Self-Dealing and Arm’s Length Transactions: All expenditures for which reimbursement pursuant to this Agreement is sought shall be the result of arm’slength transactions and not the result of, or motivated by, self-dealing on the part of the Grantee or any employee or agent of the Grantee. For purposes of this provision, “arm’s-length transactions” are those in which both parties are on equal footing and fair market forces are at play, such as when multiple vendors are invited to compete for an entity’s business and the entity chooses the lowest of the resulting bids. “Self-dealing” is involved where an individual or entity is obligated to act as a trustee or fiduciary, as when handling public funds, and chooses to act in a manner that will benefit the individual or entity, directly or indirectly, to the detriment of, and in conflict with, the public purpose for which all grant monies are to be expended.

42. Severability: If any part of this Agreement is found to be unlawful or unenforceable, such provisions will be voided and severed from this Agreement, but the remainder of the provisions in the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.

43. Site Visits: The Grantee shall allow the California State Library to access and conduct site visits, with reasonable notice, at which grant funds are expended and related work being performed at any time during the performance of the work and for up to ninety (90) days after completion of the work, or until all issues related to the grant project have been resolved. A site visit may include, but not be limited to, monitoring the use of grant funds, provide technical assistance when needed, and to visit the State funded project.

44. Termination: The Agreement shall be subject to termination by the State Librarian or designee upon notice to the Grantee at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of termination. In the event this agreement is terminated, the Grantee shall deliver to the State Librarian copies of all reports, accounting, data, and materials prepared up to the date of termination. The State Librarian shall determine and pay the Grantee for necessary and appropriate expenditures and obligations up to the date of termination which have not been covered by prior installments previously paid to the Grantee. Upon such termination, the unused portion of the grant award must be returned to the California State Library within 45 days. If funding has been advanced to the Grantee, any unobligated balances, as determined by the State Librarian, shall be returned to the State Library within 45 days of the notice of termination.

45. Timeline: Time is of the essence to this Agreement. It is mutually agreed between the parties that the grant application and the timeline included therein are part of the Agreement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 20 of 26 ends

46. Unused Funds: At the end-of-term Grantee agrees to return any unexpended or unaccounted for funds to the State Library, or to submit a written request for an extension of the grant period. Funds will be considered unexpended or unaccounted if they were: (1) not used for their intended purpose, or (2) used inconsistent with the terms of this Agreement.

Funds will also be considered unaccounted for, and must be returned, if the proposal outcomes or deliverables are materially incomplete by the end-of-term or earlier termination, as determined by the State Library in its sole discretion.

47. Waiver of Rights: California State Library shall not be deemed to have waived any rights under this Agreement unless such waiver is given in writing and signed by California State Library. No delay or omission on the part of California State Library in exercising any rights shall operate as a waiver of such right or any other right. A waiver by California State Library of a provision of this Agreement shall not prejudice or constitute a waiver of California State Library’s right otherwise to demand strict compliance with that provision or any other provision of this Agreement. No prior waiver by California State Library, nor any course of dealing between California State Library and Grantee, shall constitute a waiver of any of California State Library’s rights or of any of grantee’s obligations as to any future transactions. Whenever the consent of California State Library is required under this Agreement, the granting of such consent by California State Library in any instance shall not constitute continuing consent to subsequent instances where such consent is required and in all cases such consent may be granted or withheld in the sole discretion of California State Library.

48. Work Products: Grantee shall provide California State Library with copies of all final products identified in the Work Plan and Application. Grantee shall also provide the State Library with copies of all public education and advertising material produced pursuant to this Agreement.

49. Worker’s Compensation: The State of California will not provide Workers’ Compensation insurance for Grantee or Grantee’s employees or contract personnel. If Grantee hires employees to perform services required by this Agreement, Grantee shall provide Workers’ Compensation insurance for them.

The Grantee is aware of Labor Code Section 3700, which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workers’ Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the Labor Code, and the Grantee agrees to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 21 of 26 ends

EXHIBIT B: CERTIFICATION of COMPLIANCE FORM

1. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: I certify that the authorized representative named below is the legally designated representative of the Grantee for this Grant Agreement and project and is authorized to receive and expend funds in order to administer this grant program.

2. I certify that all information provided to the California State Library for review in association with this award is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge, and as the authorized representative of the Grantee, I commit to the conditions of this award, and I have the legal authority to do so.

3. I certify that any or all other participants or contractors in the grant program have agreed to the terms of the application/grant award and have entered into an agreement(s) concerning the final disposition of equipment, facilities, and materials purchased for this program from the funds awarded for the activities and services described in the attached, as approved and/or as amended in the application by the California State Librarian.

4. The authorized representative, on behalf of the Grantee, certifies that the Grantee will comply with all applicable requirements of State and Federal laws, regulations, and policies governing this program, to include the requirements listed below in this Certification of Compliance Form.

5. The authorized representative, on behalf of the Grantee, hereby certifies to the California State Library, for an award of funds in the amount $12,000. This award will provide library services as set forth in the Project Application as approved and/or as amended by the California State Librarian.

6. STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE: Grantee has, unless exempted, complied with the non-discrimination program requirements. (Gov. Code §12990 (a-f) and CCR, Title 2, Section 11102).

7. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS: Grantee will comply with the requirements of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1990 and will provide a drugfree workplace by taking the following actions:
a. Publish a statement notifying employees that unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensation, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited and specifying actions to be taken against employees for violations.
b. Establish a Drug-Free Awareness Program to inform employees about:
1) the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 22 of 26 ends

2) the person's or organization's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace;
3) any available counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and,
4) penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations.
c. Every employee who works on the proposed Agreement will:
1) receive a copy of the company's drug-free workplace policy statement; and,
2) agree to abide by the terms of the company's statement as a condition of employment on the Agreement.

Failure to comply with these requirements may result in suspension of payments under the Agreement or termination of the Agreement or both and Grantee may be ineligible for award of any future State agreements if the department determines that any of the following has occurred: the Grantee has made false certification or violated the certification by failing to carry out the requirements as noted above. (Gov. Code § 8350 et. seq.)

8. CONFLICT OF INTEREST: Grantee needs to be aware of the following provisions regarding current or former state employees. If Grantee has any questions on the status of any person rendering services or involved with the Agreement, the California State Library must be contacted immediately for clarification.

Current State Employees (Pub. Contract Code § 10410):
a. No officer or employee shall engage in any employment, activity, or enterprise from which the officer or employee receives compensation or has a financial interest, and which is sponsored or funded by any state agency, unless the employment, activity or enterprise is required as a condition of regular state employment.
b. No officer or employee shall contract on his or her own behalf as an independent contractor with any state agency to provide goods or services.

Former State Employees (Pub. Contract Code § 10411):
a. For the two-year period from the date, he or she left state employment, no former state officer or employee may enter into a contract in which he or she engaged in any of the negotiations, transactions, planning, arrangements or any part of the decision-making process relevant to the contract while employed in any capacity by any state agency. b. For the twelve-month period from the date, he or she left state employment, no former state officer or employee may enter into a contract with any state agency if he or she was employed by that state agency in a policy-making position in the same general subject area as the proposed contract within the 12-month period prior to his or her leaving state service.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 23 of 26 ends

If Grantee violates any provisions of above paragraphs, such action by Grantee shall render this Agreement void. (Pub. Contract Code § 10420).

Members of boards and commissions are exempt from this section if they do not receive payment other than payment of each meeting of the board or commission, payment for preparatory time and payment for per diem. (Pub.

Contract Code § 10430 (e)).

9. LABOR CODE/WORKERS' COMPENSATION: Grantee needs to be aware of the provisions which require every employer to be insured against liability for Worker's Compensation or to undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions, and Grantee affirms to comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Agreement. (Labor Code § 3700).

10. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: Grantee assures the State that it complies with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability, as well as all applicable regulations and guidelines issued pursuant to the ADA. (42 U.S.C. 12101 et. seq.)

11. RESOLUTION: A county, city, district, or other local public body must provide the State with a copy of a resolution, order, motion, or ordinance of the local governing body which by law has authority to enter into an agreement, authorizing execution of the agreement.

12. PAYEE DATA RECORD FORM STD. 204: This form must be completed by all Grantees that are not another state agency or other governmental entity.

13. DRUG FREE WORKPLACE:
a. Continue to provide a drug-free workplace by complying with the requirements in 2 C.F.R. part 3186 (Requirements for Drug-Free Workplace (Financial Assistance)). In particular, the recipient must comply with drugfree workplace requirements in subpart B of 2 C.F.R. part 3186, which adopts the Government-wide implementation (2 C.F.R. part 182) of sections 5152-5158 of the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 (P. L. 100-690, Title V, Subtitle D; 41 U.S.C. §§ 701-707).
b. This includes but is not limited to: making a good faith effort, on a continuing basis, to maintain a drug-free workplace; publishing a drugfree workplace statement; establishing a drug-free awareness program for the employees; taking actions concerning employees who are convicted of violating drug statutes in the workplace.

14. ACCESSIBILITY: The organization receiving this award, as listed in the certification section below, and all program staff, will ensure all project materials will meet California accessibility standards.

15. NON-DISCRIMINATION: The organization receiving this award, as listed in the certification section below, and all program staff, agree to comply with all California non-discrimination laws.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 24 of 26 ends

16. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: The organization receiving this award, as listed in the certification section below, and all program staff, agree to comply with California State Library acknowledgement requirements.

CERTIFICATION

ORGANIZATION
Name: Address (official and complete):

PROJECT COORDINATOR
Name:

Email: Phone:

GRANTTEE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Name: Title:

Email: Phone:

Signature: Date:

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 25 of 26 ends

Authorized Representative Signature

ORGANIZATION
Name: Address (official and complete):

AUTHROIZED REPRESENTATIVE
Signature: Date:

Printed Name of Person Signing: Title:

STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Agency Name: California State Library Address: 900 N Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 Signature: Date:

Printed Name of Person Signing: Greg
Lucas
Title: California State Librarian
DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 2/9/2022
In Process
City of Roseville
Zip Books Project
2021-2022,

Page 26 of 26 ends

EXHIBIT B: STATE REIMBURSABLE TRAVEL EXPENSES
Rates are subject to change per State of California, Department of Human Resources Please Check State of California, Department of Human Resources Website for updated expenses:
http://www.calhr.ca.gov/employees/pages/travel-reimbursements.aspx Mileage:

Rate subject to change
$0.56 per mile – approved business/travel expense
Meals:

Receipts are required
$7.00 – Breakfast
$11.00 – Lunch
$23.00 – Dinner
$5.00 - Incidentals
Meals Note: Lunch can only be claimed if travel is more than 24 hours. Incidental charge may be claimed once for every 24-hour period and should cover incidental expenses, such as but not limited to, tip, baggage handling, etc.

Hotel:

Receipts are required
and MUST have a zero
balance.
$ 90.00 plus tax for all counties/cities not listed below $ 95.00 plus tax for Napa, Riverside, and Sacramento
Counties
$ 110.00 plus tax for Marin County
$ 120.00 plus tax for Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura
Counties, and Edwards AFB. Excluding the city of Santa
Monica
$ 125.00 plus tax for Monterey and San Diego Counties
$ 140.00 plus tax for Alameda, San Mateo, and Santa
Clara Counties
$ 150.00 plus tax for the City of Santa Monica
$ 250.00 plus tax for San Francisco County
Out of State: Prior authorization must be obtained, as well as three print-out hotel quotes. Actual receipt must be included with authorization and additional quotes.

Hotel Note: If the above approved reimbursable hotel rates cannot be secured, please contact your grant monitor to obtain an excess lodging form. This form must be approved prior to actual travel.

AIRLINE TICKETS:

Itinerary and receipts are
required
Actual reasonable fees pertaining to airline travel will be reimbursed. Business, First Class, or Early Bird Check-in fee is not an approved reimbursable expense.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process

CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY
California Library Services Act

FINANCIAL CLAIM

FIRST PAYMENT
Invoice#: ZIP21-87-01
PO#
ENY: 2021
ITEM NO: 6120-211-0001, Chapter 21, Statutes of 2021
PURCHASING AUTHORITY NUMBER: CSL-6120
REPORTING STRUCTURE: 61202000
COA: 5432000
PROGRAM #: 5312
Date:

Claim of: City of Roseville
Complete Address:

Street Address, City, State, Zip Code
For: City of Roseville
Project Title: Zip Books Grant Project
Amount Claimed: $10,800 Grant Award Number: ZIP21-87
For Period From: upon execution to end of grant period
Type of Payment PROGRESS FINAL IN FULL
Payable Upon Execution of Agreement

CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury: that I am the duly authorized representative of the claimant herein; that this claim is in all respects true, correct and in accordance with law and the terms of the agreement; and that payment has not previously been received for the amount claimed herein.

By
(Signature of the authorized representative)
(Print Name)
Title
State of California, State Library Fiscal Office
By Date
(State Library representative)
If you are not using DocuSign electronic signature to submit your claim, please complete the following:

EMAIL A SCANNED COPY:

Fiscal Services
[email protected]
MAIL ONE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE TO:

California State Library
Fiscal Office – CLSA Zip Books
PO Box 942837
Sacramento, CA 94237-0001
DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process
STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

PAYEE DATA RECORD
(Required when receiving payment from the State of California in lieu of IRS W-9 or W-7) STD 204 (Rev. 03/2021)
Section 1 – Payee Information
NAME (This is required. Do not leave this line blank. Must match the payee’s federal tax return) BUSINESS NAME, DBA NAME or DISREGARDED SINGLE MEMBER LLC NAME (If different from above) MAILING ADDRESS (number, street, apt. or suite no.) (See instructions on Page 2)

CITY, STATE, ZIP CODE E-MAIL ADDRESS
Section 2 – Entity Type
Check one (1) box only that matches the entity type of the Payee listed in Section 1 above. (See instructions on page 2) ☐ SOLE PROPRIETOR / INDIVIDUAL CORPORATION (see instructions on page 2) ☐ ☐ MEDICAL (e.g., dentistry, chiropractic, etc.) SINGLE MEMBER LLC Disregarded Entity owned by an individual ☐ PARTNERSHIP
☐ ESTATE OR TRUST
☐ LEGAL (e.g., attorney services)
☐ EXEMPT (e.g., nonprofit)
☐ ALL OTHERS
Section 3 – Tax Identification Number
Enter your Tax Identification Number (TIN) in the appropriate box. The TIN must match the name given in Section 1 of this form. Do not provide more than one (1) TIN.

The TIN is a 9-digit number. Note: Payment will not be processed without a TIN. •
•
•
•
•
•
For Individuals, enter SSN.

If you are a Resident Alien, and you do not have and are not eligible to get an SSN, enter your ITIN.

Grantor Trusts (such as a Revocable Living Trust while the grantors are alive) may not have a separate FEIN. Those trusts must enter the individual grantor’s SSN.

For Sole Proprietor or Single Member LLC (disregarded entity), in which the sole member is an individual, enter SSN (ITIN if applicable) or FEIN (FTB prefers SSN).

For Single Member LLC (disregarded entity), in which the sole member is a business entity, enter the owner entity’s FEIN. Do not use the disregarded entity’s FEIN.

For all other entities including LLC that is taxed as a corporation or partnership, estates/trusts (with FEINs), enter the entity’s FEIN.

Social Security Number (SSN) or
Individual Tax Identification Number (ITIN)
___ ___ ___ -___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ ___
OR
Federal Employer Identification Number
(FEIN)
___ ___ - ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___ ___
Section 4 – Payee Residency Status (See instructions)

☐ CALIFORNIA RESIDENT – Qualified to do business in California or maintains a permanent place of business in California. ☐ CALIFORNIA NONRESIDENT – Payments to nonresidents for services may be subject to state income tax withholding. ☐No services performed in California
☐Copy of Franchise Tax Board waiver of state withholding is attached.

Section 5 – Certification
I hereby certify under penalty of perjury that the information provided on this document is true and correct.

Should my residency status change, I will promptly notify the state agency below.

NAME OF AUTHORIZED PAYEE REPRESENTATIVE TITLE E-MAIL ADDRESS SIGNATURE DATE TELEPHONE (include area code)
Section 6 – Paying State Agency
Please return completed form to:

STATE AGENCY/DEPARTMENT OFFICE UNIT/SECTION
MAILING ADDRESS FAX TELEPHONE (include area code)

CITY STATE ZIP CODE E-MAIL ADDRESS
Print Form Reset Form
DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process

STATE OF CALIFORNIA – DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

PAYEE DATA RECORD
(Required when receiving payment from the State of California in lieu of IRS W-9 or W-7) STD 204 (Rev. 03/2021)

GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
Type or print the information on the Payee Data Record, STD 204 form. Sign, date, and return to the state agency/department office address shown in Section 6.

Prompt return of this fully completed form will prevent delays when processing payments.

Information provided in this form will be used by California state agencies/departments to prepare Information Returns (Form1099).

NOTE: Completion of this form is optional for Government entities, i.e. federal, state, local, and special districts.

A completed Payee Data Record, STD 204 form, is required for all payees (non-governmental entities or individuals) entering into a transaction that may lead to a payment from the state. Each state agency requires a completed, signed, and dated STD 204 on file; therefore, it is possible for you to receive this form from multiple state agencies with which you do business.

Payees who do not wish to complete the STD 204 may elect not to do business with the state. If the payee does not complete the STD 204 and the required payee data is not otherwise provided, payment may be reduced for federal and state backup withholding. Amounts reported on Information Returns (Form 1099) are in accordance with the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and the California Revenue and Taxation Code (R&TC).

Section 1 – Payee Information
Name – Enter the name that appears on the payee's federal tax return. The name provided shall be the tax liable party and is subject to IRS TIN matching (when applicable).
• Sole Proprietor/Individual/Revocable Trusts – enter the name shown on your federal tax return. • Single Member Limited Liability Companies (LLCs) that is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for federal tax purposes - enter the name of the individual or business entity that is tax liable for the business in section 1. Enter the DBA, LLC name, trade, or fictitious name under Business Name. • Note: for the State of California tax purposes, a Single Member LLC is not disregarded from its owner, even if they may be disregarded at the Federal level. • Partnerships, Estates/Trusts, or Corporations – enter the entity name as shown on the entity’s federal tax return. The name provided in Section 1 must match to the TIN provided in section 3. Enter any DBA, trade, or fictitious business names under Business Name.

Business Name – Enter the business name, DBA name, trade or fictitious name, or disregarded LLC name.

Mailing Address – The mailing address is the address where the payee will receive information returns. Use form STD 205, Payee Data Record Supplement to provide a remittance address if different from the mailing address for information returns, or make subsequent changes to the remittance address.

Section 2 – Entity Type
If the Payee in Section 1 is a(n)… THEN Select the Box for… Individual ● Sole Proprietorship ● Grantor (Revocable Living) Trust disregarded for federal tax purposes Sole Proprietor/Individual Limited Liability Company (LLC) owned by an individual and is disregarded for federal tax purposes Single Member LLC-owned by an individual Partnerships ● Limited Liability Partnerships (LLP) ● and, LLC treated as a Partnership Partnerships Estate ● Trust (other than disregarded Grantor Trust) Estate or Trust Corporation that is medical in nature (e.g., medical and healthcare services, physician care, nursery care, dentistry, etc. ● LLC that is to be taxed like a Corporation and is medical in nature Corporation-Medical
Corporation that is legal in nature (e.g., services of attorneys, arbitrators, notary publics involving legal or law related matters, etc.) ● LLC that is to be taxed like a Corporation and is legal in nature Corporation-Legal
Corporation that qualifies for an Exempt status, including 501(c) 3 and domestic non-profit corporations. Corporation-Exempt Corporation that does not meet the qualifications of any of the other corporation types listed above ● LLC that is to be taxed as a Corporation and does not meet any of the other corporation types listed above Corporation-All Other
Section 3 – Tax Identification Number
The State of California requires that all parties entering into business transactions that may lead to payment(s) from the state provide their Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN). The TIN is required by R&TC sections 18646 and 18661 to facilitate tax compliance enforcement activities and preparation of Form 1099 and other information returns as required by the IRC section 6109(a) and R&TC section 18662 and its regulations.

Section 4 – Payee Residency Status
Are you a California resident or nonresident?
• A corporation will be defined as a "resident" if it has a permanent place of business in California or is qualified through the Secretary of State to do business in California.
• A partnership is considered a resident partnership if it has a permanent place of business in California. • An estate is a resident if the decedent was a California resident at time of death. • A trust is a resident if at least one trustee is a California resident. o For individuals and sole proprietors, the term "resident" includes every individual who is in California for other than a temporary or transitory purpose and any individual domiciled in California who is absent for a temporary or transitory purpose. Generally, an individual who comes to California for a purpose that will extend over a long or indefinite period will be considered a resident. However, an individual who comes to perform a particular contract of short duration will be considered a nonresident.

For information on Nonresident Withholding, contact the Franchise Tax Board at the numbers listed below:

Withholding Services and Compliance Section: 1-888-792-4900 E-mail address: [email protected] For hearing impaired with TDD, call: 1-800-822-6268 Website: www.ftb.ca.gov Section 5 – Certification
Provide the name, title, email address, signature, and telephone number of individual completing this form and date completed. In the event that a SSN or ITIN is provided, the individual identified as the tax liable party must certify the form. Note: the signee may differ from the tax liable party in this situation if the signee can provide a power of attorney documented for the individual.

Section 6 – Paying State Agency
This section must be completed by the state agency/department requesting the STD 204.

Privacy Statement
Section 7(b) of the Privacy Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-579) requires that any federal, state, or local governmental agency, which requests an individual to disclose their social security account number, shall inform that individual whether that disclosure is mandatory or voluntary, by which statutory or other authority such number is solicited, and what uses will be made of it. It is mandatory to furnish the information requested. Federal law requires that payment for which the requested information is not provided is subject to federal backup withholding and state law imposes noncompliance penalties of up to $20,000. You have the right to access records containing your personal information, such as your SSN. To exercise that right, please contact the business services unit or the accounts payable unit of the state agency(ies) with which you transact that business.

All questions should be referred to the requesting state agency listed on the bottom front of this form.

DocuSign Envelope ID: E5C33B9E-F462-450F-8506-E66CCA3E5254 In Process

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2129
File #: 0704 & 0705
Title: Expanded Learning Opportunities Program - Memorandum of Understanding Contact: Jeff Nereson 916-774-5974 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.27.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Recommends City Council adopt a resolution approving the Memorandum of Understanding with the Dry Creek Elementary School District ("District") for the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program ("ELOP"), and authorizing the City Manager to execute it.

BACKGROUND
ELOP is provided by schools and community based organizations to create enriching experiences for youth after school during the school year, and in the summer, through activities that complement and support classroom-based instruction for children enrolled in kindergarten (including transitional kindergarten) through sixth grade.

The ELOP program is offered to students who meet the qualifications of being low income (measured by Free/Reduced Lunch eligibility), English learner, or a foster youth.

The Dry Creek Elementary School District desires to offer the opportunity for ELOP eligible students to participate in the Adventure Camp program during the summer and Adventure Club program after school during all academic school days at Coyote Ridge Elementary School. The Adventure Camp and Adventure Club program will accept up to 140 ELOP eligible students per session, if capacity allows, with no impact to returning paid families.

FISCAL IMPACT
There will be no negative fiscal impact to the Youth Development Fund for this program. The District will compensate the City for each ELOP eligible student registration, as well as the costs for program supplies, snacks, and enrichment components.

The approval of a Memorandum of Understanding meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Goal C - Maintain a safe and healthy community
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Respectfully Submitted,
Jeff Nereson, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Manager
Jill Geller, Parks, Recreation & Libraries Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-210
ELOP Agreement
RESOLUTION NO. 22-210

APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, BY AND BETWEEN THE DRY

CREEK JOINT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE,

AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF THE

CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a Memorandum of Understanding regarding the Expanded Learning Opportunities Program, by and between the Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District and the City Of Roseville, has been reviewed by the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said Memorandum of Understanding is approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 2022, by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCIL MEMBER:

NOES COUNCIL MEMBER:

ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBER:

Mayor
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2146
File #: 0103-17 & 0201
Title: Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority - Fiscal Year 2022-23 Budget Contact: Nick Rosas 916-774-5314 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.28.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff is recommending the City Council, acting as the Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority (RNGFA), adopt the attached resolution approving the RNGFA FY2022-23 budget.

BACKGROUND
Attached is the Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority (RNGFA) budget for FY2022-23. The debt service expense budget of $16,753,500 represents principal and interest payments on the 2007 Gas Revenue Bonds, which financed the prepayment of natural gas used for power generation at the Roseville Energy Park.

FISCAL IMPACT
The budget document provides a financial summary of the revenues and expenses of the RNGFA. Approval of the annual budget has no new fiscal impact.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to activities that will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment, or is otherwise not considered a project as defined by CEQA Statute §21065 and CEQA State Guidelines §15060(c)(3) and §15378. Approval of a yearly budget meets the above criteria and is not subject to CEQA. No additional environmental review is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Respectfully Submitted,
Nick Rosas, Accounting Manager
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer _____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 1-22
FY2022-23 Budget

ROSEVILLE NATURAL GAS FINANCING AUTHORITY
RESOLUTION NO. 1-22
ADOPTING THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2022-23
WHEREAS, the Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority has reviewed the proposed Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority Budget FY2022-23; NOW, THEREFORE, the Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority does hereby resolve that the attached Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority Budget FY2022-23 is hereby approved.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES AGENCY MEMBERS:

NOES AGENCY MEMBERS:

ABSENT AGENCY MEMBERS:

CHAIR
ATTEST:

Secretary
Roseville Natural Gas Financing Authority
Actual Estimate Budget
FY2021 FY2022 FY2023
OPERATING REVENUES Current Services - Sale of Natural Gas to Roseville Electric 16,563,066 $ 16,803,750 $ 16,753,500 $ Administrative Fees 50,046 55,000 55,000 Total Revenues 16,613,112 16,858,750 16,808,500LESS OPERATING EXPENSES Administrative Expenses (Audit, Fiscal Agent & Rating Agency) 23,040 20,000 20,000 Interest Expense - - - Total Operating Expenses 23,040 20,000 20,000LESS CAPITAL AND DEBT EXPENSES Debt Service - Series 2007 Gas Revenue Bonds 16,614,602 16,784,500 16,788,500 Total Capital and Debt Expenses 16,614,602 16,784,500 16,788,500 INCREASE (DECREASE) FROM OPERATIONS (24,530) 54,250 -FUND BALANCE, BEGINNING OF YEAR (19,908) (44,438) 9,812INCREASE (DECREASE) FROM OPERATIONS (24,530) 54,250 -FUND BALANCE, END OF YEAR (44,438) $ 9,812 $ 9,812 $ RNGFA-FY23 Budget-working file 5/25/2022

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2149
File #: 0200
Title: Tax Revenue Consulting Services - Professional Services Agreement Amendment Contact: Scott Pettingell 916-774-1306 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.29.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a first amendment to professional services agreement with MuniServices, LLC for tax revenue consulting services.

BACKGROUND
On April 7, 2021, the City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a professional services agreement with MuniServices, LLC to provide sales tax and transactions and use tax auditing, projection, recovery, and consultant services. The agreement terms included an initial two-year term and an annual not-to-exceed amount of $150,000 per year, or $300,000 over the total agreement term. MuniServices, LLC's compensation is based on a portion of quarterly revenues received by the City due to their audit and recovery services.

The misallocated sales tax and transaction and use tax identified by MuniServices, LLC's audit and recovery services were significantly higher than initially projected. The additional sales and use tax revenues that the City receives from these services more than offsets the cost. It is challenging to forecast the misallocated sales tax identified in a given year.

Staff recommends that the City Council approve increasing the annual not-to-exceed amount under this agreement to $250,000 per year, or $500,000 over the initial two-year term.

FISCAL IMPACT
The additional cost of this recommended agreement amendment for sales tax audit and recovery services will be more than offset by additional General Fund sales tax revenues.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) only applies to projects which have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines §15061(b)(3)).

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal A - Remain fiscally responsible in a changing world Respectfully Submitted,
Scott Pettingell, Budget Manager
Dennis Kauffman, Assistant City Manager/Chief Financial Officer _____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-230
Sales Tax Revenue Consulting Services
RESOLUTION NO. 22-230

APPROVING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT, BY

AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE AND MUNISERVICES, LLC, AND

AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE IT ON BEHALF OF

THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, a first amendment to professional services agreement for tax revenue consulting services, by and between the City of Roseville and MuniServices, LLC, has been reviewed by the City Council; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Roseville that said first amendment is hereby approved and that the City Manager is authorized to execute it on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City of Roseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk

COUNCIL COMMUNICATION
CC #: 2124
File #: 0800-02 & 0214
Title:

Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Energy and Storage System Project - Grant Application
Contact: Sean Bigley 916-774-5513 [email protected] Meeting Date: 6/15/2022
Item #: 7.30.

RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
Staff recommends the City Council (1) adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign all grant application documents for the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Solar Energy and Storage System Project (Project) under the Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration’s (EDA) Economic Adjustment Assistance (EAA) Grant and (2) acknowledge via City Council Resolution the availability of sufficient resources in the Water Rehabilitation Fund for the required local grant match.

BACKGROUND
In 2018, Congress passed the American Water Resiliency Act (AWIA) which required water systems serving more than 3,300 people to develop or update risk assessments and emergency response plans (ERPs) and provide a certification of completion to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). The City of Roseville (City) completed this mandated assessment working with Jacobs Consulting (Jacobs) via a professional service agreement.

An additional optional task under this professional services agreement was to examine the City’s risk relative to future energy security - specifically energy impacts due to wildfire events and projected energy impacts/disruptions as a result of the State of California’s current energy policies (i.e., heavy development of wind and solar energy assets while divesting in more traditional energy assets). In addition to this assessment of risk to the City, Jacobs was tasked with developing recommended resiliency investments to reduce future energy disruption risk to the City’s water infrastructure.

Not surprisingly, due to the fact that most of the City’s water infrastructure receives energy service from Roseville Electric Utility, recommendations from Jacobs focused mostly on one key vulnerability within City’s water system – the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (WTP) which is located in Granite Bay and is powered by energy from Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E).

After evaluating the recommendations from Jacobs, one project rose as a feasible energy resiliency investment – installation of 998-kilowatts of direct current (kWdc) solar photovoltaic (PV) panels, and a 500-kilowatt alternating current (kWac) battery energy storage system (BESS) at the Barton Road WTP. Once constructed, the Barton Road WTP Solar Array and Battery Back-Up Resiliency Project (Project) will provide a backup energy supply of a minimum of 96 hours (four days) to the Barton Road WTP in the event of a power outage, allowing for continued treatment and delivery of high-quality water to the City’s customers.

The system will also provide near "net zero" energy performance for the Barton Road WTP on an annual basis and will minimize carbon emissions associated with operations. Power produced by the solar array will be approximately 1,500,000-kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, about equal to the annual energy consumption of the Barton Road WTP. This will significantly reduce the cost of energy for the City and will contribute to California’s renewable portfolio standards as well as potential federal or state mandates around renewable energy. The electricity delivered by PG&E has a Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission rate of 0.542 pounds of carbon dioxide per kWh. The reduction of GHG emissions is more than 780,000 pounds by replacing the PG&E power with the Project.

The Department of Commerce’s Economic Development Administration (EDA) regularly provides federal funding for projects under its Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Program to develop economic resiliency for communities that may face disasters that cause economic harm. Given the purpose of this resiliency project and the City’s economic strength and role in the broader regional economy, staff felt that the Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Program is a good match for this proposed project.

Successful applicants must gain support from project beneficiaries for the proposed project. In preparing the grant application, City staff were able to obtain the following private-sector support for the Project:
• Penumbra, Inc.
• Kaiser Permanente
• Sutter Roseville Medical Group
• Adventist Health
• Sun City Roseville
• TSI Semiconductors
In addition to seeking support from private sector beneficiaries, City staff obtained letters of support from the following elected representatives and regional partners for the Project:
• Senator Alex Padilla
• Senator Dianne Feinstein
• Congressmember Tom McClintock
• Sacramento Area Council of Governments
• Greater Sacramento Economic Council
• Valley Vision
Therefore, staff requests that City Council (1) authorize the City Manager to sign all grant application documents for the EDA’s Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant; and, (2) the City Council acknowledge via City Council Resolution the availability of Water Rehabilitation funds for the required local grant match.

If the City’s EDA Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant application is approved, total project costs are $6,592,877 with $4,925,776 in federal grant funds, $1,231,444 in local matching funds and $435,657 in non-reimbursable administrative costs from the Water Rehabilitation Fund, which is funded by water utility sales. Upon award of the Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant by the EDA to the City, a budget adjustment will be placed on a future City Council agenda for City Council consideration.

An approved budget adjustment would commit local matching funds for the Project for the duration of the Project performance period. The performance period for the project will span from November 2022 through December 2024; or 26 months from the execution of the EDA grant award documents by the City of Roseville’s City Manager, following approval by the Roseville City Council.

If the Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant application is approved for award by EDA in the latter half of 2022, the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (WTP) Solar Energy and Storage System Project would likely be constructed and operational by the first half of 2025.

FISCAL IMPACT
If the City’s EDA grant application is approved, the total project cost is $6,592,877 with $4,925,776 in federal grant funds, $1,231,444 in local matching funds and $435,657 in nonreimbursable administrative costs from the Water Rehabilitation Fund which is funded by water utility sales. Upon award of the Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Grant by the EDA to the City, a budget adjustment will be placed on a future City Council agenda for City Council consideration.

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed project involves minor alterations of an existing facility. This activity is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as a Class 1 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines §15301). The proposed project also involves minor alteration in the condition of the land, and which will not remove healthy, mature scenic trees. This activity is categorically exempt from CEQA as a Class 4 Exemption (State CEQA Guidelines §15304). The Exemption has been prepared and no further CEQA action is required.

CITY COUNCIL STRATEGIC PLAN/OVERARCHING GOALS
Goal D - Enhance economic vitality
Goal E - Deliver exceptional city services
Goal F - Invest in well-planned infrastructure and growth Respectfully Submitted,
Sean Bigley, Assistant Environmental Utilities Director Richard Plecker, Environmental Utilities Director
_____________________________
Dominick Casey, City Manager
ATTACHMENTS:

Description
Resolution 22-206
Exhibit A - Project Features
Exhibit B - Project Location
FORM CD-511 - CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING
ED-900 – General Application for EDA Programs
Attachment for Question G.3 of Form ED-900GA
ED-900A - Additional EDA Assurances for Construction Or Non-Construction Investments ED-900C– EDA Application Supplement for Construction Programs ED-900E – Calculation of Estimated Relocation and LandAcquisition Expenses Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
BUDGET INFORMATION- Construction Programs - SF-424C
ASSURANCES - CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS - SF 424D
900B - Penumbra
900B - Sun City Roseville
900B - Sutter Health
900B - TSI Semiconductors
Support Letter - Adventist Health
Support Letter - GSEC
Support Letter - Kaiser
Support Letter - Penumbra
Support Letter - SACOG
Support Letter - Sun City Roseville
Support Letter - Sutter Health
Support Letter - TSI Semicunductors
Support Letter - Valley Vision
PER- Appendix A - PG&E Carbon Footprint Calculator Assumptions Basis of Design Report (BODR)
Preliminary Design Report (PDR)
Preliminary Engineering Report (PER)
Draft Supplement EIR- Barton WTP
Draft EIR- 60 inch WTP Pipeline
NEPA Draft EDA Environmental Narrative
RESOLUTION NO. 22-206

APPROVING A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

COMMERCE, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINSTRATION, AND AUTHORIZING

THE CITY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE TO EXECUTE ALL RELATED FORMS AND

AGREEMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ROSEVILLE
WHEREAS, the United States Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration (EDA) regularly provides federal funding for projects under its Economic Adjustment Assistance (EAA) Program to develop economic resiliency for communities that may face disasters that cause economic harm; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the American Water Resiliency Act passed in 2018, the City worked with a consultant in order to be in compliance with the mandated assessment; and WHEREAS, an additional task also completed by the consultant was to examine the City’s risk relative to future energy security, specifically energy impacts due to wildfire events and projected energy impacts/disruptions as a result of the State of California’s current energy policies; and
WHEREAS, one project recommended from the consultant was a feasible energy resiliency investment: the installation of 998-kilowatts of direct current (kWdc) solar photovoltaic (PV) panels, and a 500-kilowatt alternating current (kWac) battery energy storage system (BESS) at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (WTP); and WHEREAS, staff recommends City Council approval of the submittal of an EAA grant application for the proposed project and acknowledge via City Council Resolution the unencumbered availability of sufficient resources in the Water Rehabilitation Fund for the entirety of the proposed project’s period of performance as required for the local grant match.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Roseville hereby approves filing of the EAA grant application to the United States Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that City will have sufficient resources in the Water Rehabilitation Fund for the required local grant match.

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager or his designee is authorized to execute all related forms and agreements on behalf of the City of Roseville.

PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Council of the City ofRoseville this day of , 20 , by the following vote on roll call:

AYES COUNCILMEMBERS:

NOES COUNCILMEMBERS:

ABSENT COUNCILMEMBERS:

MAYOR
ATTEST:

City Clerk
Exhibit A
Project location and imagery of project concept
Exhibit A
Project location and imagery of project concept
Exhibit A
Project location and imagery of project concept





B
arto
n
R
d







Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) [ OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community
0 0.5 1 2 3
Miles

 B:\EU\MAPSHARE\ARC STUFF\Water\JaneHiggins\Barton Water Treament Plant Solar Prj - Grant Application\GIS\MXDs\BRWTP_SolarPrj_Map2.mxd 

 
 








^



CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING
FORM CD-511
(REV 1-05)
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in the regulations before completing this form. Signature on this form provides for compliance with certification requirements under 15 CFR Part 28, 'New Restrictions on Lobbying.' The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Department of Commerce determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement.

LOBBYING
As required by Section 1352, Title 31 of the U.S. Code, and implemented at 15 CFR Part 28, for persons entering into a grant, cooperative agreement or contract over $100,000 or a loan or loan guarantee over $150,000 as defined at 15 CFR Part 28, Sections 28.105 and 28.110, the applicant certifies that to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, 'Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying.' in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.

This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure occurring on or before October 23, 1996, and of not less than $11,000 and not more than $110,000 for each such failure occurring after October 23, 1996.

Statement for Loan Guarantees and Loan Insurance
The undersigned states, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:

In any funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this commitment providing for the United States to insure or guarantee a loan, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, 'Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying,' in accordance with its instructions.

Submission of this statement is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required statement shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure occurring on or before October 23, 1996, and of not less than $11,000 and not more than $110,000 for each such failure occurring after October 23, 1996.

As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above applicable certification. * NAME OF APPLICANT
* AWARD NUMBER * PROJECT NAME
Prefix: * First Name: Middle Name:
* Last Name: Suffix:
* Title:
* SIGNATURE: * DATE:

Completed by Grants.gov upon submission. Completed by Grants.gov upon submission.

City of Roseville
Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Energy and Storage System Project
OMB Number: 0610-0094
Expiration Date: 10/31/2024
ED-900 – General Application for EDA Programs
This form is required for application to EDA grant programs, consistent with the requirements outlined in each program Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO). Applicants are strongly encouraged to clearly and concisely respond to each answer in the space provided. Applicants should not provide additional documents or narratives without prior written approval from EDA.

A. Applicant Information
A.1. Please identify all applicants for this project.

The Lead Applicant is the party who is responsible for handling disbursements of funds and reporting to EDA.

Please note: Active registration with the System for Award Management (SAM) is required of all EDA applicants and awardees at www.SAM.gov. Please list the relevant Commercial and Government Entity CAGE Code and SAM expiration data for all applicants and co-applicants (if any) in the table below.

Name
SAM.gov
CAGE Code
SAM.gov
Registration
Expiration Date
Fiscal Year
End Date
(mm/dd)
Lead Applicant City of Roseville, California
Co-Applicant 1
Agency Disclosure Notice: This information collection is authorized by OMB control #0610-0094. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 17.1 hours per response for non-construction projects and 43 hours per response for construction projects, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration at [email protected]. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to any penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a currently valid OMB control number.

B. Scope of Work
B.1. Describe the scope of work for the proposed EDA investment, including a list of project tasks to be undertaken.

List the specific tasks/activities that will be undertaken as a result of this investment.

Applicants for construction assistance should also include a statement of project components, including whether the proposed project involves the construction of a new facility (or facilities) or the expansion, renovation, or replacement of an existing facility or facilities. Applicants should also describe the proposed project components in terms of dimensions, capacities, quantities, square footage, etc. and should verify the description aligns with the engineering description provided in the preliminary engineering report, the environmental narrative, and other application materials.

Applicants for Partnership Planning Assistance should provide a narrative on the economic development activities that will be undertaken, which must include managing and maintaining the Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) process.

Applicants for Short Term Planning Assistance or Local Technical Assistance should provide a narrative explaining how the proposed scope of work will enhance economic development planning capacity of the identified region. Applicants should include information regarding any relationship or collaboration with other public and private entities, and should explain how the strategy will expand the capacity of public officials and economic development organizations to work effectively with employers and enable the region to plan and coordinate the use of available resources to support economic recovery and the development of a regional economy and/or develop innovative approaches to economic revitalization in the region.

Applicants for State Planning Assistance should provide a narrative outlining the proposed scope of work for the project, including the relationship to any existing CEDS or similar planning processes, and the goals and objectives of the proposed project.

Applicants for a Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) should clearly define the service area of the proposed Revolving Loan Fund, the types and size of loans anticipated to be made under the RLF and the focus area of the RLF (if any). Applicants should describe how the RLF will be designed to make loans to businesses that cannot otherwise obtain traditional bank financing. Applicants should describe what (if any) technical assistance will be provided for loan applicants/borrowers and explain how quickly grant funds are expected to be deployed (i.e. lent) to potential borrowers.

Energy infrastructure, a resource of critical importance to Roseville’s economic health, businesses, and residents, has become increasingly unreliable throughout the greater Sacramento-Placer region and statewide. At present, power to the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (WTP) is supplied by Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E). PG&E’s grid reliability has declined markedly in recent years and has become more vulnerable to extreme weather, wildfire, cyberattack, earthquake, vandalism, grid failure, climate disruption, Public Safety Power Shutoffs, and Senate Bill 100. The purpose of the Proposed Project is to provide a backup “net zero” energy supply of a minimum of 96 hours to the Barton Road WTP in the event of a power outage; provide better adaptability for Roseville’s healthcare facilities amongst shifting needs resulting from the novel Coronavirus (Covid-19) Pandemic; support the ability of healthcare facilities in Roseville to serve traditionally underserved populations and communities; and allow for continued treatment and delivery of over 100 million gallons per day of high-quality, potable water to Roseville’s customers. This is imperative given the health and safety, environmental, and economic impacts that inaccessible or non-potable water could have on the community; it has become more important than ever in light of both short-term (e.g., pandemic and public health emergency preparedness) and long-term needs (e.g., drought resiliency and wildfire protection).

The newly constructed facilities of the Proposed Project will consist of two key pieces of integrated infrastructure as follows:
• (1) A solar array, approximately 1 Megawatt (MW) in capacity, will provide near net zero energy performance at the Barton Road WTP. Solar arrays will be built as spans across the Barton Road WTP Flocculation/Sedimentation Basins.
• (2) A 4-Megawatt hour (MWH) Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) will be the key to energy resilience, and it will only require approximately 1/8 acre of space. This can be accommodated to the west and north of the Barton Road WTP Substation.

To complete the Proposed Project elements, the following tasks will need to be undertaken. • New equipment will need to be installed, including:
o solar PV modules mounted on a racking canopy structure, o a BESS,
o microgrid controls,
o a diesel generator,
o and electrical wiring.
• The entire solar PV, BESS, and microgrid controls system will be installed behind the meter which is interconnected with the PG&E distribution system that is currently serving the power load at the Barton Road WTP.
• The existing 500-kilowatt (kW) diesel generator that provides standby power will be included in the new microgrid. The generator will augment the solar power and BESS when there is a sustained grid power outage.

B.2. Describe the specific deliverables/outcomes that the project will produce and the primary beneficiaries or audience of those deliverables. Please note that deliverables are defined as the specific outcomes that will come from the project and differ from information on project tasks/activities requested in B.1. Project tasks/activities requested in B.1 should be reported as process steps that will be achieved to reach the final project while deliverables/outcomes detailed in B.2 are the final product produced.

The solar array is sized to provide energy resilience during long duration power outages. The system will also provide near “net zero” energy performance for the Barton Road WTP on an annual basis and will minimize carbon emissions associated with operations. Power produced by the solar array will be approximately 1,500,000-kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, about equal to the annual energy consumption of the Barton Road WTP. This will significantly reduce the cost of energy for Roseville and will contribute to California’s renewable portfolio standards as well as potential federal or state mandates around renewable energy. The electricity delivered by PG&E has a Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission rate of

0.542 pounds of carbon dioxide per kWh. By replacing the PG&E power with the Proposed Project, the reduction of GHG emissions is more than 780,000 pounds (see Appendix A to the Preliminary Engineering Report for more details).

Energy produced by the solar array or the diesel generator (which is expected to be minimal) will be stored by the BESS.

The BESS can also store power supplied by the electrical grid. When a power outage occurs, the BESS will immediately pick up the load of the Barton Road WTP. In addition, the BESS can be used daily to shave the peak energy demand.

Solar PV without energy storage is not an effective way to peak shave because power production is reduced on cloudy days. Shaving the peak demand of the Barton Road WTP with energy storage not only reduces demand charges and further reduces the utility costs but also supports grid stability by reducing the load on the regional power grid when the grid is most stressed. The State of California and the California Independent System Operator are both highly in favor of projects of this type because they generate renewable energy while also supporting grid stability through peak energy demand reductions.

The Proposed Project will ensure that the Barton Road WTP can serve the City of Roseville’s residents, businesses, visitor’s and the greater community with clean, reliable water under any grid condition, as well as reduce the Barton Road WTP’s GHG emissions and contribute to the stability of the regional electrical grid. This Preliminary Engineering Report describes the Proposed Project’s components, construction methods, permitting requirements, schedule, and budget in more detail.

B.3. Identify the proposed time schedule for the project, including specific project milestones.

This schedule is also available within Section C.10 of the Preliminary Engineering Report. • RFP Released by the City
o Duration (months): Not Applicable
o Approximate Completion Date: November 25, 2022
• Pre-Proposal Conference
o Duration (months): 0.5
o Approximate Completion Date: December 2, 2022
• Deadline for Final Questions
o Duration (months): 0.25
o Approximate Completion Date: December 7, 2022
• City Responses to Written Questions
o Duration (months): 0.25
o Approximate Completion Date: December 9, 2022
• Proposal Submission Deadline
o Duration (months): 0.5
o Approximate Completion Date: December 21, 2022
• Interviews as needed
o Duration (months): 1
o Approximate Completion Date: January 18, 2023
• Contract Negotiations
o Duration (months): 1
o Approximate Completion Date: February 17, 2023
• Contract Approval by City Council
o Duration (months): 2
o Approximate Completion Date: April 14, 2023
• Commencement of Services
o Duration (months): 0.25
o Approximate Completion Date: April 21, 2023
• Design
o Duration (months): 6 to 8
o Approximate Completion Date: December 2023
• Permit Acquisition 3-6 Concurrent with
o Duration (months): 3 to 6
o Approximate Completion Date: Concurrent with Design
• Interconnection Agreement with PG&E
o Duration (months): 12
o Approximate Completion Date: Concurrent with Design and Construction • Construction and Equipment Procurement
o Duration (months): 9 to 12
o Approximate Completion Date: December 2024
B.4. Describe how the proposed project aligns with one or more of EDA’s investment priorities. Current EDA investment priorities are available at https://www.eda.gov/about/investment-priorities/. Applicants must identify all relevant investment priorities with which the project aligns with and describe how the project advances each relevant priority (ies).

The Proposed Project falls within all of EDA’s funding priorities but are most aligned in the following manners:
• The Proposed Project will provide resilient and sustainable power to Roseville’s primary water treatment facility, ensuring a reliable water supply for residents, businesses, and critical healthcare facilities. o Recovery and Resilience
• The Proposed Project will allow Roseville’s healthcare facilities to better adapt to changing needs related to the ongoing Covid-19 Pandemic and future crises by providing continual access to safe, clean water. Roseville’s healthcare facilities continue to meet the additional demands placed on the greater Sacramento-Placer region’s healthcare industry due to reduced capacity or lack of access to permanent or traveling staff resources in other hospitals as a result of constraints presented by the current pandemic. o Equity
o Recovery and Resilience
• Roseville primarily serves surface water, and the Barton Road WTP is its only surface water treatment plant. The Proposed Project will make the Barton Road WTP more resilient to increasing threats to the region’s power supply by installing 1,000 kW solar photovoltaic panels and a 500 kW BESS. o Recovery and Resilience
o Environmentally Sustainable Development
• The Proposed Project will help Roseville mitigate for and adapt to climate change by reducing greenhouse emissions generated by energy consumption and providing a redundant power supply in the event of an interruption in power supply (e.g., natural disaster, system failure). o Recovery and Resilience
o Environmentally Sustainable Development
• The Proposed Project will support job retention and growth in the greater Sacramento-Placer region by ensuring the Barton Road WTP’s ability to provide a high-quality water supply to residents, businesses, manufacturers, and healthcare facilities during power outages, natural disasters, and other emergency events. o Workforce Development
o Manufacturing
o Technology-Based Economic Development
o Exports and Foreign Direct Investments
• By providing a reliable water supply, the Proposed Project will support the ability of healthcare facilities in Roseville to serve traditionally underserved populations and communities. Roseville encompasses two regional hospital facilities at the Kaiser Permanente and Sutter Health campuses that—even during the Covid-19 pandemic—have the resources needed to provide high-quality and wide-ranging healthcare services to community members of all backgrounds and socioeconomic levels, beyond Roseville’s jurisdictional borders. o Equity
C. Project Region
C.1. Project Location
Project location is the physical location where the project work occurs. Project location information helps EDA conduct application reviews and map projects. Providing complete and accurate information is important to the application review process. For revolving loan funds (RLF), the project location is the RLF lending area.

C.1.a. For construction projects, identify the physical location of construction. Include as much geographical information as possible including street address (or close approximation), census tract(s), county(ies), and state(s). If more than one census tract applies, please identify all census tracts where the project will be located.

Address: 9595 Barton Rd, Granite Bay, CA 95746 -- Census Tract: 6061020605 The City of Roseville (Roseville) is located in Placer County, California, 405 miles north of Los Angeles, 102 miles northeast of San Francisco, and 16 miles north of Sacramento, the state capital. Roseville encompasses 43.05 square miles, with a population of more than 147,000 residents. The Proposed Project will be located at Roseville’ existing Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (Barton Road WTP).

The Barton Road WTP is located at Latitude: 38.72401 and Longitude: -121.186607, which is approximately two miles east from Roseville’s boundaries and less than a mile west of Folsom Lake, which is owned and operated by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation.

C.1.b. For planning, technical assistance, revolving loan funds or other non-construction projects, identify the primary location(s) where the work will be conducted. Include as much geographical information as possible including census tract(s), county(ies), and state(s). If more than one census tract applies, please identify all census tracts where the project will be located. If all census tracts in a county apply, include “All Census Tracts” after the county name. For Revolving Loan Fund applications, please describe the proposed geographic lending area.
9595 Barton Rd, Granite Bay, CA 95746
Census Tract: 6061020605
City: Roseville
County: Placer County
State: California
No
Yes
C.2. Estimated Area of Impact
The estimated area of impact for your project is the area expected to benefit directly from the proposed EDA project. For construction projects, area of impact could include the commuting shed where potential employees may reside. For non-construction projects the area of impact could include the geographic scope where the work will occur and where the output of the work will be utilized. Defining the area of impact helps EDA to assess the economic benefits of projects and the merits of applications. Providing complete and accurate information is critical to the application review process.

List all census tracts, counties, and state where the project benefit will occur. If all census tracts in a county apply, include “All Census Tracts” after the county name. 9595 Barton Rd, Granite Bay, CA 95746
Census Tract: 6061020605
City: Roseville and Sacramento
County: Placer County
State: California
C.2.a. Underserved Populations/Geographies
Does the majority of proposed project’s planned area of impact (as defined above) serve an underserved population or represent an underserved geography? For definitions of these terms in relation to the planned area of impact, please visit https://eda.gov/about/investment-priorities/. Please identify the specific populations/geographies below following the guidance provided at the website referenced above and describe how the project will intentionally attempt to improve the economic conditions of the underserved population or geography within the project’s planned area of impact.

If yes, enter an explanation in the field below:

D. Economic Development Needs
To be completed by applicants for non-construction assistance only D.1. Current Economic Conditions - Area of Impact. Briefly describe the economic conditions of the estimated area of impact with a focus on available data describing the level of distress, if applicable. This should also include a concise overview of the economic development needs, area’s workforce, industry clusters, main economic drivers, challenges, and assets. Describe the economic adjustment problems or economic dislocations the area is experiencing (or is likely to experience in the next 24 months). Relevant data may be drawn from the regional CEDS, https://eda.gov/resources/tools/, as well as other sources.

You’ll be asked to provide more details about this in Section H. For revolving loan fund applications, please include information on borrowers and industry sectors that the loan fund is anticipated to target.

The Sacramento region is a dynamic place in which to work, live, and play. Historically, the region has enjoyed a high degree of prosperity relative to other mid-sized metropolitan areas. Yet the Covid-19 Pandemic, infrastructure deficiencies, and fires have exposed structural vulnerabilities in the regional economy that hindered full recovery from those events. Located in Placer County, along the eastern edge of the Sacramento Valley, and at the base of the Sierra Nevada foothills, Roseville is just 16 miles from Sacramento, the state capital of California. Roseville is part of the greater Sacramento—Roseville—Arden-Arcade, California Metro Area that approximately 2.3 million people call home. What started as a town developed by miners from the famed Gold Rush has blossomed into a thoughtfully developed, independent city that makes up the mix of urban and suburban areas around the Metro Area center of Sacramento. Roseville incorporated on April 10, 1909, and is a charter city operating under a City Manager-Council form of government. Roseville is the largest city in Placer County and is characterized by a mix of older and newer development. Its center is typified by the downtown and small lot and single-family residences, while newer commercial and office development and larger suburban-type residences characterize the edges of town. There are approximately 55,074 housing units in Roseville, and it has experienced steady growth in population as planned developments come to fruition. Roseville has an estimated population of over 147,000 residents, and the median age of Roseville residents is 37.6 years.

As of March 2020, 66,300 people worked in Roseville. The most common employment sectors for those who live in Roseville are health care and social assistance; retail trade; and professional, scientific, and technical services.

Roseville’s health care industry has a major role in supporting the population within the City and greater Sacramento region. Several large health care companies have a presence in Roseville including, McKesson, Penumbra Inc., Adventist Health, UC Davis Medical, Kaiser Permanente, and Sutter Health. Roseville’s two major hospitals, Kaiser Permanente and Sutter Health, provide acute, trauma, and specialty care for residents throughout the region.

D.2. Explain how the proposed EDA investment addresses the economic development needs identified in D.1. For revolving loan fund projects, please explain the need for capital in the area.

Safe, clean water is a necessity to adequately providing medical treatment in a hospital setting. Ensuring Roseville’s healthcare facilities have consistent access to that water allow those facilities to have greater flexibility and capacity to respond to ongoing and future crises (e.g., public health emergencies and pandemics, natural disasters, grid failure).

Roseville is a full-service city that operates its own Electric and Environmental Utilities (water, wastewater, waste services and recycled water). These departments play a significant role in supporting the region and health care industry. Resilient water infrastructure is critical to maintaining and growing Roseville and the region’s economy by ensuring a solid foundation for success always knowing that there will be access to clean and safe drinking water.

Recently, the State of California, specifically those served in PG&E service territory have experienced energy rolling blackouts due to extreme hot temperatures and wildfire danger. While almost all Roseville’s water infrastructure is served by the very reliable Roseville Electric Utility, the Barton Road WTP, which is vital to Roseville’s 147,000 plus residents and 6,200 plus businesses, millions of visitors each year, and healthcare facilities throughout the greater Sacramento-Placer region, providing over 50 million gallons per day (MGD) of treated surface water supply (100 MGD at community build-out), is served by Pacific Gas and Electric.

Out of concern for these emerging energy reliability issues, Roseville hired a professional consultant to examine these energy reliability threats and offer potential energy reliability solutions. One of the alternatives the Roseville would like to pursue is the permitting, design, and construction of a 1,000 kW Solar Energy Array and 500 kw BESS at the Barton Road WTP which will allow it to operate independently of the grid for up to four days. The Proposed Project will develop and maintain reliable, sustainable power for the Barton Road WTP. This will directly benefit not only Roseville’s two regional hospitals, but hospitals in nearby, underrepresented, or rural communities. If those other hospitals become overloaded or evacuated/damaged, patients may be rerouted to Roseville’s regional hospitals that can more easily accommodate the patients. The Proposed Project will also contribute to California’s renewable portfolio standards as well as federal mandates around renewable energy.

Through more consistent use of the new solar array with a BESS, Barton Road WTP has the potential to be “net zero,” powered by clean energy as a direct result of the Proposed Project. The proposed EDA investment will assist in bringing this critical project to fruition, protect the WTP from unforeseen power disturbances and allow the City of Roseville to continue servicing important regional assets during times of crisis or natural disasters.

D.3. Does the project align with the regional Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS)? Except for grants to fund developing, updating or refining a CEDS as described in 13 C.F.R. § 303.7, the project must be consistent with the CEDS for the area in which the project will be located, unless EDA approves an alternative strategy. Information on the CEDS can be obtained at http://www.statsamerica.org/ceds/Default.aspx.

Yes
No
If Yes, what is the CEDS your project aligns with?
The Greater Sacramento Region’s CEDS is conducted in collaboration with the Prosperity Partnership:

Greater Sacramento Economic Council, Sacramento Area Council of Governments, Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce and Valley Vision. The findings, conclusions, and recommendations are based on multiple sources and work projects that include but are not limited to the Prosperity Partnership, RW Ventures, Brookings Institute, Centers of Excellence, and regional partners.

If No, then please attach an alternate strategic planning document with which the project aligns:

N/A – Not Applicable
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
D.4. How does the proposed project align with the regional CEDS (and for revolving loan fund projects, how does the proposed project align with the applicable RLF Plan)? Applicants should identify the specific CEDS strategy(s) that the project helps advance and explain how the project supports the identified goal(s).

The Greater Sacramento CEDS is a strategic framework for the six-county region that prioritizes our core economic initiatives, resulting in a more aligned, prosperous and resilient Sacramento Region. The Region’s Prosperity Strategy is focusing on three principle goals: improve business, support people, and develop place. The strategy’s approach is designed to catalyze a strong, inclusive, innovative and resilient economy for the Greater Sacramento region. There are several key initiatives our project aligns with including supporting the life sciences industry cluster, infrastructure, business friendly environment and innovation and entrepreneurship. The Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Energy and Storage System Project is a resiliency investment to reduce future energy disruption risk to the City’s water infrastructure. Completion of the project with provide protection to the water treatment plant that not only serves Roseville residents and businesses but also major regional hospitals and manufactures. By the City investing to protect its water infrastructure this project will retain jobs in industries that employ and serve the entire region. Additionally, the project will assist with attracting more employment as the Sacramento region experiences rapid growth.

D.5. Attach a letter from the organization responsible for the CEDS indicating how the proposed project aligns with the CEDS. If the estimated impact area is not covered by a CEDS, attach a letter of support from the organization responsible for the alternative planning document.

E. Economic Impact of the Project
E.1. Provide a clear and compelling justification for the long-term potential economic impact of the proposed project, through anticipated job creation or retention, private investment leveraging, number of businesses or collaborations supported, or other appropriate measures. All job and private investment estimates should reflect the anticipated impact within nine years of the potential EDA investment and applicants should provide documentation or third-party data to substantiate claims.

For RLF applications, applicants should clearly define lending and technical assistance (if applicable) impacts expected, including targeted borrowers and industry sectors, and should describe the applicant’s plan for ensuring sustainability of RLF lending into perpetuity, including information on other lending programs that may be leveraged to subsidize operational costs through economies of scale and loan pricing, and other relevant factors.

The Barton Road WTP is vital to Roseville’s 147,000 plus residents and 6,200 plus businesses, millions of visitors each year, and healthcare facilities throughout the greater Sacramento-Placer region, providing over 100 million gallons per day of treated surface water supply. At present, power to the Barton Road WTP is supplied by PG&E. PG&E’s grid reliability has declined markedly in recent years, and it has become more vulnerable to extreme weather, wildfire, cyberattack, earthquake, vandalism, grid failure, climate disruption, Public Safety Power Shutoffs, and Senate Bill 100. The Proposed Project will provide a backup energy supply of up to 96 hours to the Barton Road WTP in the event of a power outage, allowing for continued treatment and delivery of high-quality water to Roseville’s customers. Energy infrastructure is a resource of critical importance to Roseville’s economic health, businesses, and residents and has become increasingly unreliable throughout the greater Sacramento-Placer region and statewide. This has become more important than ever in light of both short-term (e.g., pandemic and public health emergency preparedness) and long-term needs (e.g., drought resiliency and wildfire protection).

According to 2020 U.S. Census Bureau data, Placer County is one of four growing counties in California. There are approximately 85,000 jobs within the City of Roseville; 70,000 workers attached to those jobs come from outside of Roseville while 15,000 are residents of the city. The confidence in Roseville’s infrastructure will assist in the creation of new jobs, retention of current jobs and future capital investment in the community. Many of these jobs, approximately 6,500, are within the health care industry. Prior of April 2020, Sutter Roseville Medical Center’s Emergency Room treated approximately 85,000 patients per year at a facility built to handle 60,000 patients. In April 2020, Sutter completed a $178 million expansion to increase capacity for care of the region. Kaiser Permanente is planning an addition of a new $299 million inpatient tower at its Roseville facility to keep up with demand of serving the greater Sacramento region and neighboring communities. Furthermore, this will directly benefit not only Roseville’s two regional hospitals, but hospitals in nearby, underrepresented, or rural communities. If those other hospitals become overloaded or evacuated/damaged, patients may be rerouted to Roseville’s regional hospitals that can more easily accommodate the patients. Expansions of these facilities create job growth throughout the region and are not possible without the City continuing to improve its infrastructure.

E.2. Does the proposed project have one or more committed beneficiaries? A committed beneficiary is defined as a specific business that is expected to create or retain jobs and/or invest private funds as a result of the proposed project.

Yes
No, Go to E.5
E.3. Beneficiaries of the project
If applicants have identified specific private sector employers that are expected to create and/or save jobs as a result of the project, applicants should list those beneficiaries in the table provided below.

All job and private investment estimates should reflect the anticipated impact within nine years of the potential EDA investment. Jobs should be reported as full-time equivalents (FTEs) and should be attributable to the proposed EDA investment. Private investment reflects the amount of funds expected to be invested in the business as a result of the project.

Applicants should identify the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for the major industry category of the beneficiary company (see https://www.census.gov/naics/ for a searchable list).

Form ED-900B must be completed and signed by an authorized representative of each beneficiary that expects to create and/or save 15 or more jobs as a result of the project.

Beneficiary Name NAICS
Code
Main product or
service produced
by beneficiary
Estimated
Jobs
Created
Estimated
Jobs
Retained
Estimated
Private Investment
Penumbra Inc. 334510 Healthcare 2,400 600 TBD
Kaiser Permanente 622110 Healthcare 0 5,900 TBD
Sutter Roseville Medical Group 000622 Healthcare 0 3,361 TBD Adventist Health 923120 Healthcare 0 1,500 TBD
Sun City Roseville 813910 10 200 TBD
TSI Semiconductors 334413 Semiconductors 267 250 $30,000,000.00 Total 2,777 11,811 2,777
E.4. Do all "Other Parties" (as listed in question E.3.), i.e., businesses that estimate they will create and/ or save 15 or more jobs as a result of the EDA project, understand and agree to comply with all applicable civil rights requirements listed in 13 C.F.R. § 302.20, including the requirement to provide signed assurances of compliance (Form ED-900B)?
All project beneficiaries except Kaiser Permanente and Adventist Health were able to provide the signed assurances of compliance (Form ED-900B). However, all project beneficiaries, in addition to other organizations and elected officials, were able to provide a signed letter of support for the Project.

E.5. Please identify the total estimated jobs expected to be created and retained and the amount of private investment expected to be generated by this project. If your project is not expected to generate/retain jobs or attract private investment please enter 0 for each category in the table below.

Estimated Jobs Created Estimated Jobs Retained Estimated Private Investment Not Applicable (No Other Parties Identified) Yes No (explain below) 2,777 11,811 $30,000,000.00
E.6. Please identify the source(s) of the jobs and private investment estimates provided above in E.5 (check as many as apply):

Signed Beneficiary forms (Form ED-900B)
Letters from Beneficiaries of the Project
Input/Output Model (e.g. IMPLAN, REMI)
Other Method (specify below)
E.7. If your project is estimated to generate/retain jobs, will those jobs exceed the prevailing wage for the industry (ies) in the project area? Prevailing wage is defined by the Department of Labor as “the average wage paid to similarly employed workers in a specific occupation in the area of intended employment.” For more information, visit https://eda.gov/about/investment-priorities/.

No
Yes
If Yes, please provide an explanation below (e.g., how far above the prevailing wage?).

The jobs generated and retained offer competitive pay and benefits for the Sacramento region. In alignment with the “well-paying quality jobs” description, the jobs help the employee develop skills and experiences to advance their career. Additionally, several of the employers who will generate and retain jobs are regional hospitals located in Roseville and are represented by various unions.

E.8. If your project is estimated to generate/retain jobs, will the associated jobs be represented by a union?
No, none of the jobs will be represented by a union
Unknown. Please provide an explanation or additional information in the box below:

Not all jobs are represented by unions; however, many of the jobs generated and retained by Roseville’s regional hospitals such as Kaiser Permanente, Sutter Health and Adventist Health are represented by various unions.

Yes, all of the jobs will be represented by a union
Yes, some of the jobs will be represented by a union
If only some of the jobs will be represented by a union, please provide the percentage of jobs that will be represented by a union in the box below:

F. Capacity and Administration
F.1. List and describe the strategic partners and organizations that will be engaged in this project Describe any third-party organizations, including governmental agencies, that will be directly engaged in supporting the proposed project, and explain how each partner will be engaged in the project.

For revolving loan fund applications, please include any RLF supporting partners, such as banks, other economic development lenders, and business support entities that will be engaged in supporting the RLF.

Yes No (explain below)
Besides the involvement of consulting staff for the purposes of project engineering and design, the City of Roseville will be the only agency involved with the Proposed Project.

F.2. Applicant's organizational capability
Briefly describe your organization’s capability to administer, implement, and maintain the project, including prior experience with federal awards. List any awards received from EDA in the last five years, along with the relevant federal award ID numbers, if known.

For Revolving Loan Fund applications, please include a list of other lending programs that your organization currently operates, its approximate size, source of capitalization, and the general target(s) of each fund, if any. Revolving loan fund applicants should also explain their capacity to operate a public lending program, to manage lending activities, and to create networks between the business community and other financial providers. RLF applicants should also describe any other lending programs managed by the applicant, and describe the applicant’s ability to sustain the RLF lending into perpetuity (which could include other lending programs that subsidize operational costs through economies of scale and loan pricing – interest and fee income).

The City of Roseville was incorporated April 10, 1909 and is a Charter City operating under the council-manager form of municipal government. Roseville owns and operates its own water utility that has a management structure and professional technical staff to administer, implement, and maintain the Proposed Project. The water utility—Barton Road WTP—is also located on land owned by Roseville.

F.3. Applicant's staff capacity
Identify the key staff members who will be responsible for implementing the project and briefly describe how their expertise and experience qualifies them for the project. State whether you will administer the award yourself or contract with a third party for grant administration.

For revolving loan fund applications, applicants should clearly specify whether they intend to manage the fund themselves or will enter into a management agreement with another entity.

Sean Bigley, Environmental Utilities Assistant Director George Hanson, Principal Engineer
Stephen Peterson, Chief Water Treatment Plant Operator
G. Budget and Match Information
G.1. Are all non-EDA funds committed to the project, available as needed, and not conditioned or encumbered in any way that would preclude their use for the project? Yes (explain below) No
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
G.1.a. Identify the source, nature and amount of all non-EDA funds. Applicants should identify the source, nature and amount of all non-EDA funds, including in-kind contributions (non-cash contributions may include space, equipment, services, or assumptions of debt). Explain the status of all funding commitments, including the date the funds will be available from each source, and describe any conditions or restrictions on the use of such funds. If in-kind contributions are included, explain the basis on which they are valued, and describe the source, amount and any terms and conditions of the funding, and when the funding will be available for use by the applicant.

Source Amount Date Available Type Restriction/Comments
Water Rehabilitation
Fund $1,667,101 June 16, 2022
Funded through
Water Utility sales
revenue,
deposited into the
Water Operations
Fund and
subsequently
transferred to the
Water
Rehabilitation
Fund.

None
G.1.b. Do you plan to seek other federal financial assistance as part of or in connection with this project, including federal funds passed through by state governments or other entities? If so, identify the source, amount, timing of funding availability, and whether the funds are subject to any restrictions relevant to the project.

Revolving loan fund applicants should specify any other federal loan funds they administer, including source, amount, and focus.

G.1.c. Attach documentation confirming all non-EDA funding is available, committed, and unencumbered.

Documentation is required from all sources of match. For example, if bonds are contemplated as match, counsel opinion of the applicant’s bonding authority and eligibility of the bonds for use as match, along with full disclosure of the type of bonds and the schedule of the applicant’s intended bond issue, are required.

G.1.d. This question should only be completed for construction projects.

Attach a budget narrative with a breakdown for each “cost classification” line item included on the SF-424C and its associated tasks. The budget narrative must include both EDA and non-EDA funds and be consistent with the detailed construction cost estimate in the preliminary engineering report.

G.1.e. This question should only be completed for design and engineering assistance only projects.

Attach a budget narrative with a breakdown for each “cost classification” line item included on the SF-424C and its associated tasks. The budget narrative must include both EDA and non-EDA funds.

Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Yes No
Yes No
G.1.f. The following questions should only be completed for non-construction projects.

Attach a budget narrative with a breakdown for each “cost classification” line item included on the Form SF-424A and its associated tasks. The budget narrative must include both EDA and non-EDA funds and be consistent with the detailed construction cost estimate in the preliminary engineering report.

G.1.f.1. Is your organization seeking indirect costs on your non-construction project? Yes No
G.1.f.2. Is your organization requesting the de minimis indirect cost rate on your non-construction project in accordance with Uniform Guidance at § 200.414.

Yes No
If indirect costs are requested as part of the budget, attach a copy of your organization’s current federal negotiated indirect cost rate agreement or other indirect cost documentation as permitted under the applicable NOFO.

G.2. Justification for sole source procurement
Will you contract work to complete part or all of this project? If yes, will contracts be awarded by competitive bid?
Yes No
Provide a justification for contracts that will not be awarded competitively.

G.3. Equipment
Will any funds be used to purchase equipment? (Per 2 CFR § 200.33 equipment is defined as tangible personal property (including information technology systems) having a useful life of more than one year and a per-unit acquisition cost greater than $5,000).

If yes, will project funding be used to install the equipment? Yes No
Will the applicant provide EDA a security interest in the significant items of tangible personal property acquired or improved with EDA investment assistance? (For more information, see 13 C.F.R. 314.9).

Yes No (explain below)
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Yes No
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Attach a list of equipment to be purchased, including unit price, quantity, description, purpose, and estimated useful life.

G.4. Business Incubators and Accelerators
Does the applicant intend to construct or renovate a business incubator, accelerator, commercialization center, or similar project?
If Yes, please attach a feasibility study demonstrating the need for the Project and an operational plan based on the industry best practices demonstrating the plan for ongoing successful operations. See the applicable NOFO for additional information and guidance.

H. Regional Eligibility
The City of Roseville declared a local emergency due to Covid-19 on March 17, 2020. As of February 2022, there have been 66,066 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Placer County, with 536 deaths. The majority of the cases have been in south Placer County, which includes the City of Roseville. Sacramento County, which lies adjacent to Roseville, reported a total of 285,000 confirmed cases and 2,728 deaths as of February 2022. According to 2018 U.S.

Census Bureau data, 16.5 percent of Roseville residents are over the age of 65, which is higher than the nationwide total of 16 percent. Roseville’s hospitals have helped support the surrounding region through the Covid-19 Pandemic and continue to provide mutual aid under a State Public Health Order issued August 16, 2021. Roseville’s healthcare facilities continue to meet the additional demands placed on the greater Sacramento-Placer region’s healthcare industry due to reduced capacity or lack of access to permanent or traveling staff resources in other hospitals as a result of constraints presented by the current pandemic. In addition to providing care to Covid-19 patients, Roseville’s hospitals service an aging population in the area. Roseville is home to Sun City Roseville, a 55+ community which includes 3,110 residences. A number of assisted living/skilled nursing facilities are located in Roseville, which have a total capacity of 1,235 residents. There are 22 adult residential facilities in Roseville that have a total capacity for 495 residents that are living with mental and developmental disabilities.

H.1. Explain how the estimated area of impact defined in section C.2 above meets EDA’s distress criteria as defined in the applicable NOFO. EDA will review and evaluate documentation submitted by the applicant to verify eligibility.

H.2. Economic Distress
Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance projects must satisfy regional eligibility requirements (see the relevant NOFO for more details). This section will assist EDA in determining if the proposed project satisfies these eligibility requirements.

Planning and Technical Assistance applications: although meeting specific distress criteria is not a prerequisite for funding under these programs, the economic distress level of the region impacted by a project serves as the basis for establishing the EDA share of the total cost of the project and can inform competitiveness.

Check all that apply in establishing regional eligibility (see NOFO for more details):

Unemployment rate
Per capita income
Special need, including:

Closure or restructuring of industries or the loss of a major employer, essential to the regional economy;
Substantial out-migration or population loss;
Underemployment; that is, employment of workers at less than full-time or at less skilled tasks than their training or abilities permit;
Military base closure or realignment, defense contractor reductions-in-force, or U.S.

Department of Energy defense-related funding reductions; Natural or other major disasters or emergencies;
Extraordinary depletion of natural resources or other impact attributable to a new or revised federal regulation or policy that will have a significant impact on a community’s ability to prevent an extraordinary depletion of natural resources; Negative effects of changing trade patterns; or
Other circumstances set forth in the applicable NOFO (please explain below).

The City of Roseville declared a local emergency due to Covid-19 on March 17, 2020. As of February 2022, there have been 66,066 confirmed cases of COVID-19 in Placer County, with 536 deaths. The majority of the cases have been in south Placer County, which includes the City of Roseville. Sacramento County, which lies adjacent to Roseville, reported a total of 285,000 confirmed cases and 2,728 deaths as of February 2022. According to 2018 U.S. Census Bureau data, 16.5 percent of Roseville residents are over the age of 65, which is higher than the nationwide total of 16 percent. Roseville’s hospitals have helped support the surrounding region through the Covid-19 Pandemic and continue to provide mutual aid under a State Public Health Order issued August 16, 2021. Roseville’s healthcare facilities continue to meet the additional demands placed on the greater Sacramento-Placer region’s healthcare industry due to reduced capacity or lack of access to permanent or traveling staff resources in other hospitals as a result of constraints presented by the current pandemic. In addition to providing care to Covid-19 patients, Roseville’s hospitals service an aging population in the area. Roseville is home to Sun City Roseville, a 55+ community which includes 3,110 residences. A number of assisted living/skilled nursing facilities are located in Roseville, which have a total capacity of 1,235 residents. There are 22 adult residential facilities in Roseville that have a total capacity for 495 residents that are living with mental and developmental disabilities.

Check the box denoting what data source you used to establish eligibility:

The most recent ACS data published by the U.S. Census Bureau.

The most recent Bureau of Labor Statistics Data.

The most recent other federal data for the region in which the project is located (e.g., U.S. Census Bureau or the Bureaus of Economic Analysis, Labor Statistics, Indian Affairs, etc.).

If no federal data are available, the most recent data available through the state government for the region in which the project is located.

Other data to substantiate regional eligibility based on a "Special Need" as defined in 13 C.F.R. § 300.3.

H.3. Source of data provided for regional eligibility determination Yes No
Yes No
Yes No (explain below)
H.4. Substantial Direct Benefit
If the project does not meet any of the criteria above, is it located in an Economic Development District (EDD), and will it provide substantial direct benefit to residents of an area within that EDD that does meet the distress criteria?
Identify the Economic Development District (EDD) where the project will be located.

A project provides a “substantial direct benefit” if it provides significant employment opportunities for unemployed, underemployed or low-income residents of the identified area within the EDD that meet the distress criteria. Please explain how the proposed project will provide a substantial direct benefit to this distressed area within the identified EDD.

H.5. Location in a geographic area of distress
If the project is located in a region that overall does not meet any of the criteria above, is the project located in a defined geographic area that meets EDA’s distress criteria for unemployment or per capita income? To qualify, a project must be physically located in a distressed area (for construction projects) or primarily intended to benefit the distressed area (for non-construction projects).

If yes, define the area of distress where the project will be located using Census tracts or other geographical designations (e.g., political subdivisions) and explain how the area meets the distress criteria for unemployment or per capita income. Identify the source of the data used to demonstrate distress.

I. Administrative Requirements
I.1. Civil rights
Do you understand and agree to comply with all applicable civil rights requirements (see 13 C.F.R. § 302.20)? Yes No (explain below)
Yes
No, go to question I.4
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
I.2. Lobbying certifications
All applicants for federal financial assistance must certify that federal funds have not been used and will not be used for lobbying in connection with this request for federal financial assistance (Form CD-511). If non- federal funds have been or are planned to be used for lobbying in connection with this request for federal financial assistance, Form SF-LLL also must be completed. Applicants must comply with 13 C.F.R. § 302.10 regarding attorneys' and consultants' fees and the employment of expediters. This regulation requires that applicants identify and disclose the amount of fees paid to anyone engaged to assist the applicant in obtaining assistance under the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965 (PWEDA), as amended.

Will you be able to comply with federal requirements regarding lobbying? I.3. Compliance with Executive Order 12372, State Single Point of Contact (SPOC) Does the state in which the project will be located have a project review process that requires submission to a Single Point of Contact (SPOC)? A list of states that maintain a Single Point of Contact can be found at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/SPOC-4-13-20.pdf.

If Yes, does this request for EDA investment assistance require review by SPOC? Yes No (explain below)
If Yes, were SPOC comments/clearance received?
Yes
Please attach the comments/clearance:

No. The review period has expired and no comments were received.

No. Comments have been requested but the review period has not yet expired.

Please attach evidence of your request for comments:

Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Yes No
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
I.4. Single Audit Act Requirement
Did your organization expend more than $750,000 in federal funds during your previous fiscal year? If yes, what is the date of the last submission of the audit Federal Audit Clearinghouse? April 4, 2022
If no, please attach your organization’s most recent financial audit or financial statement.

J. Requirements for Non-Governmental Applicants (Excluding Public Universities and Certain District Organizations)
Non-governmental applicants (excluding public universities and certain district organizations) must also provide a copy of the following items, either using the Attachments form that is part of the application package in www.Grants.gov.

J.1. Non-profit organizations must provide a current certificate of good standing or equivalent from the State in which they are incorporated.

J.2. Non-profit organization applicants must provide their Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws. Nonprofits with an active EDA grant must either provide a) a revised copy of their Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws if these have been amended or b) a statement certifying that there has been no change in the organization’s Articles of Incorporation or By-Laws.

J.3. Non-profit organizations must provide a resolution passed by a general purpose political subdivision of a State (e.g., local government entity) or a letter signed by an authorized representative of a local government acknowledging that the applicant is acting in cooperation with officials of the political subdivision. EDA may waive this requirement for certain projects of significant regional or national scope (see 13 CFR § 301.2(b)).

J.4. If applying for a construction or RLF investment, an applicant must afford the appropriate general purpose governmental authority a minimum of 15 days to review and comment on the proposed project (13 CFR § 302.9(a)).

Will the applicant be able to provide these comments?
Yes
Not applicable, because the applicant is not applying for a construction or RLF grant Not applicable, because this requirement has been satisfied under an existing RLF plan No, for another reason (explain below)
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Attachment for Question G.3 of Form ED-900GA
(Equipment Narrative from Section C.1 of the Preliminary Engineering Report) The Project includes installation of new PV modules with a racking canopy structure, a BESS, microgrid controls, and electrical wiring at the Barton Road WTP. The existing diesel generator will be incorporated into the microgrid as a standby power supply but is expected to rarely operate. Each of these project components is further described below.

Solar Photovoltaic Modules: To produce the required 1,500,000-kWh of electricity per year, about 2,500 solar PV modules will be installed on a canopy structure that is designed for the purpose of supporting the solar array. The solar array will include solar modules, often referred to as panels, direct current (DC) combiner boxes, and inverters which turn the DC power into alternating current (AC) power. The actual number of solar modules to be installed depends on the capacity of the module selected by the construction contractor and approved for use during construction. The inverters will be capable of synchronizing for operation in parallel with power supplied by PG&E. The estimated useful life of the solar PV modules is 25-years.

Solar Module Racking Canopy Structure: The solar array will include a structural steel, rigid frame, long span canopy racking system to support the solar modules. The canopy will be installed above the existing flocculation/sedimentation basins at the Barton Road WTP for an effective use of space. The structure will be designed in accordance with professional standards for construction loads (ASCE7) and solar PV arrays (SEOC PV-2). The overall footprint of canopy is approximately 56,000-square feet (160- feet by 350-feet) and the estimated useful life is 25-years.

Battery Energy Storage System: The BESS will supply up to 500-kWac of electricity demand. It will have 4,000-kWh of energy storage using lithium-ion batteries. The system will be a modular, skid mounted system with integrated cooling and fire suppression systems. The dimensions are approximately 10-feet by 40-feet. It will be located close to the existing substation in a 20-foot by 60-foot fenced enclosure.

The controls and inverters have an estimated useful life of 25-years, but the batteries are estimated at 15-years.

Microgrid Controls: The controller will monitor the supply of power from the electrical grid and the new solar array, as well as control the components of the microgrid. While the controls have an estimated useful life of 20-years, this equipment may come with a recommendation to upgrade to newer generations in a shorter amount of time.

Diesel Generator: The existing 500-kW diesel generator will be connected to the microgrid to provide standby power. The diesel generator will be used to charge the battery when the solar resource is insufficient. This would typically occur if there were a long duration outage in the middle of winter when the sun is at its lowest angle.

Electrical Wiring: Underground electrical conduits and wiring will connect the components of the microgrid to the existing Barton Road WTP substation with an estimated useful life of 25-years. (Budget Break Down for Equipment from Table 4 of the Preliminary Engineering Report) Component Price per
Unit
Quantity Units Subtotals Funding Source

10. Equipment
Solar Panels $0.51 998,000 Wdc $ 508,980 -
Canopy Steel $0.40 998,000 Wdc $ 399,200 -
Wire $0.08 998,000 Wdc $ 79,840 -
Inverters $0.08 998,000 Wdc $ 79,840 -
Interconnection $0.40 998,000 Wdc $ 399,200 -
BESS Inverters $1,500 500 Wac $ 750,000 -
BESS Batteries $300 4000 Wh $ 1,200,000 -
Microgrid Control(s) $325,000 1 Each $ 325,000 -
Equipment Total $ 3,742,060 Federal Share
ED-900A - Additional EDA Assurances for
Construction Or Non-Construction Investments
OMB Number: 0610-0094
Expiration Date: 11/30/2021
For ALL investments: As a duly authorized representative of the applicant, I further certify that the applicant:

1. Understands that attorneys' or consultants' fees, whether direct or indirect, expended for securing or obtaining EDA investment assistance are not eligible costs. See 13 C.F.R. § 302.10(a).

2. Understands that conflicts of interest or appearances of conflicts of interest are prohibited and may jeopardize this application or result in the forfeiture of investment funds. A conflict of interest occurs, for example, where a representative, official, employee, architect, attorney, engineer, or inspector of the applicant, or a representative or official of the federal, State or local government, has a direct or indirect financial interest in the acquisition or furnishing of any materials, equipment, or services to or in connection with the project. See 13 C.F.R. § 302.17.

3. Will comply with the reporting requirements under the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) of 1993 and the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRAMA) for measuring and reporting project performance.

For CONSTRUCTION investments: As a duly authorized representative of the applicant, I further certify that the applicant:

1. Will operate and maintain the facility in accordance with at least the minimum standards as may be required or prescribed by applicable federal, State and local agencies for the maintenance and operation of such facilities.

2. Will require the facility to be designed to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA) (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.), the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4151 et seq.) and the Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities regulations, as amended (36 C.F.R. part 1191), and will be responsible for conducting inspections to insure compliance with these requirements.

3. For the two-year period beginning on the date EDA investment assistance is awarded, will refrain from employing, offering any office or employment to, or retaining for professional services any person who, on the date on which the investment assistance is awarded or within the one-year (1) period ending on that date, served as an officer, attorney, agent or employee of the Department of Commerce and occupied a position or engaged in activities that EDA determines involved discretion with respect to the award of investment assistance under PWEDA. See section 606 of PWEDA and 13 C.F.R. §302.10(b).

4. Will have no facilities under ownership, lease or supervision to be utilized in this project that are listed or under consideration for listing on EPA's List of Violating Facilities.

5. Will comply with Executive Order 12699, "Seismic Safety of Federal and Federally Assisted or Regulated New Building Construction," which imposes requirements that federally-assisted facilities be designed and constructed in accordance with the most current local building codes determined by the awarding agency or by the Interagency Committee for Seismic Safety in Construction (ICSSC) and the most recent edition of the American National Standards Institute Standards A58, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures.

6. Will observe and comply with federal procurement rules, as set forth in 2 C.F.R. part 200, as applicable, for award of any contracts for architectural engineering, grant administration services, or construction financed with EDA investment assistance For NON-CONSTRUCTION investments: As a duly authorized representative of the applicant, I further certify that the applicant:

1. Will comply with applicable regulations regarding indirect cost rates, if indirect costs are included in the application.

2. Will comply with the requirement that this investment assistance will not provide a proprietary benefit to a private individual, for-profit corporation, or other commercial entity.

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL TITLE

APPLICANT ORGANIZATION DATE SUBMITTED
Completed on submission to Grants.gov
Completed on submission to Grants.gov
OMB Number: 0610-0094
Expiration Date: 10/31/2024
ED-900C – EDA Application Supplement for
Construction Programs
A. Metropolitan Area Review
A.1. Is the Project located in a Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA)? Yes No (go to B.1.)
A.2. Projects within an MSA that involve the development of hospitals, airports, libraries, water supply and distribution facilities, sewage and waste treatment works, highways, transportation facilities, water development, or land conservation require comments from the metropolitan area clearinghouse/ agency. Does the proposed project involve any of the above identified developments? Yes No (go to B.1.)
A.3. If Yes, please attach either:

Comments from the responsible metropolitan area clearinghouse/agency and a statement that such comments have been considered; or
An explanation as to why comments are not available; or A statement indicating the date the application was made available to the appropriate metropolitan area clearinghouse/agency and units of general local government for review and certifying that the application has been before the metropolitan area clearinghouse/agency for a period of 60 days without comments or recommendations.

Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
B. District Organization Project Administration
B.1. Will the District Organization for the region in which the project will be located administer the project for the applicant?
Yes No
B.2. If Yes, the applicant must be able to certify to all of the following and indicate such certification by checking each box:

The administration of the project is beyond the capacity of the applicant’s current staff and would require hiring additional staff or contracting for such services; No local organization/business exists that could administer the project in a more efficient or costeffective manner than the District Organization; and The District Organization will administer the project without subcontracting the work.

C. Preliminary Engineering Report
To be considered for assistance, all construction and design applications must include a Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) that at a minimum provides the following information:
(Note: The Preliminary Engineering Report should be completed by a Professional Engineer or Architect.

If the applicant plans on using the same engineer or architect for full design if the grant is awarded, the engineer or architect must be competitively procured in accordance with 2 C.F.R. part 200 for the PER; otherwise, the architect or engineer may be excluded from bidding for design work under the grant award.)
C.1. Project Overview.
• Insert the project description from Section B.1. of the ED-900GA. • If the project contains elements of work that are not in the EDA-funded project, or if there is a larger overall project of which EDA is a smaller component, describe the non-EDA funded parts of work.
• Identify project components that have a useful life of less than 20 years and provide the useful life for each of these components.

C.2. Project drawings.
• Identify and label existing conditions such as existing infrastructure elements or structures within the EDA project construction limits.
• Identify and label proposed project components with rough dimensions and general layouts. • Identify and label the location of any project beneficiaries identified in Section E.3 of the Form ED-900GA, if applicable.
• Color coding, labeling, legends and keyed notes are encouraged.

C.3. Construction cost estimate.
• Provide a detailed construction cost estimate in terms of quantities, unit prices, and total costs for all the EDA project components.
• Provide a basis for the determination of construction contingencies. • If separate contracts are anticipated for demolition or site work, provide a separate detailed cost estimate for these components. If demolition or site work will not be separate contracts, include the costs in the overall detailed construction cost estimate.

C.4. Project constraints.
• Describe any design and construction constraints for the proposed project.

C.5. The proposed method of construction procurement.
• Identify if the project will be traditional design/bid/build with a sealed competitive bid process consistent with 2 C.F.R. § 200.320(c).
• Identify if any portion of the project is to be done by an alternate construction procurement method such as design/build, construction management at risk, the applicant’s own forces, and/or a construction manager.
(Note: If an alternate construction procurement method is proposed, a construction services procurement plan must be provided to EDA for approval in accordance with EDA’s regulation at 13 C.F.R. § 305.6(a).)
C.6. Number of construction contracts anticipated.
• Identify the number of construction contracts anticipated and provide a description of the project components for each contract.
(Note: If project phasing is proposed, a project phasing request must be provided to EDA for approval per EDA’s regulation at 13 C.F.R. § 305.9(a).) C.7. Project permits.
• List permits required for the proposed project.
• Provide the timeline to obtain the permits and their current status. Permits should include, but are not limited to: Clean Water Act Section 404 permits, NPDES permits including stormwater permits, railroad permits, highway encroachment, etc.

C.8. Project schedule.

Provide the following proposed project schedule in terms of months. (Note: If project phasing is proposed, provide a schedule for each construction contract.) • A/E procurement, if applicable;
• design period;
• period of time to obtain required permits;
• period of time to obtain any required easements, rights-of-way, or other real property rights needed for the project (including permits or licenses needed for entering land owned by a third party);
• solicitation of bids;
• awarding of contracts;
• construction period.

C.9. Preliminary Engineering Report.

Please attach a Preliminary Engineering Report that provides the information contained in C.1.- C.8.

Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
D. Title Requirements
D.1. Does the applicant currently hold title to the real property necessary for the project? Yes No (explain below in D.3.)
D.2. Does the applicant currently hold all easements, rights-of-way, long-term leases, or other property rights necessary for the project, such as licenses or permits often required to work within railroad rights-of-way, highway rights-of-way, or on other publicly owned lands? Yes No (explain below in D.3.)
D.2.a. Please check, if applicable:

This project requires work on a State or local government owned roadway or highway, or a highway crossing.

This project requires work within a railroad-right-way, or over a railroad crossing.

D.3. If no to D.1. or D.2., explain how and when the applicant plans to obtain the property rights needed for the proposed project?
D.4. If real property is being acquired as part of the project, does the applicant have a signed agreement for the purchase, such as a purchase and sale agreement or option to purchase? See 13 CFR 314.7 (c)(1).

Yes (attach agreement) No (explain below) Not Applicable Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
D.5. The Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (41 U.S.C. § 4601 et seq.) (URA) applies to federally funded projects involving the acquisition of real property or that displace persons from their homes, businesses, or farms. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal participation in the purchases. (See URA’s implementing regulations at 49 CFR part 24 and Certification #11 on Form SF-424D, “Assurances – Construction Programs” for an explanation of this requirement).

Please note that if real property is being acquired for this project, including the acquisition of easements, applicants may need to follow the appraisal procedures of the URA.

D.5.a. Will the project cause the displacement of individuals, families, businesses or farms? Yes No
D.5.b. Are relocation expenses for costs incidental to land acquired pursuant to the URA included in the proposed budget? These costs are separate from the estimated purchase price. Examples of such costs include those for recording fees, surveys, appraisals, title searches, real property taxes, etc.

Yes No
If yes to either D.5.a. or D.5.b., explain below how acquisition and relocation procedures will comply with the URA. In addition, applicants must complete Form ED-900E, “Calculation of Estimated Relocation and Land Acquisition Expenses” for purposes of completing the SF-424C (Budget Information - Construction Programs).

D.6. Is (or was) any real property connected to the proposed project subject to eminent domain or the threat of such proceedings?
Yes (explain below) No
D.7. Is the project located on a military or Department of Energy installation that is closed or scheduled for closure or realignment?
Yes (explain below) No
D.8. For certain projects involving real property, including real property included as matching share, EDA regulations generally require recipients to execute a mortgage, deed of trust, or covenant of use in the real property acquired or improved with EDA investment assistance. In general, this interest should be a first priority lien. For Indian Tribe recipients, this interest will generally be a Covenant of Purpose, Use, and Ownership. See 13 CFR § 314.8.

Will the applicant be able to provide the required lien or covenant? Yes No (explain how you will satisfy 13 CFR § 314.8)
D.9. This question may require consulting with applicant’s legal counsel, a title company, or a real estate specialist.

Is the property to be acquired or improved with EDA investment assistance, including real property to be used as matching share, free of any mortgages, deeds of trust, liens or other encumbrances, reservations, reversionary interests or other restrictions on the applicant’s interest in the property, including those related to bonds, certificates of participation and similar financing structures? Yes No (explain below)
If no, describe any mortgages, deed of trust, liens or other encumbrances, reservations, reversionary interests or other restrictions on the applicant’s interest in the property D.10. Will real property acquired or improved with EDA investment assistance, or real property included as matching share, be used to collateralize any type of financing, including but not limited to bonds or tax credits?
Yes (explain below) No
D.11. Briefly describe plans for the operation, maintenance and management of all project facilities, including any land, improved land, structures, and appurtenances thereto.

Not Applicable
The City of Roseville's Barton Water Treatment Plant (facilities, structures, equipment, land, etc) is maintained by a utility maintenance crew, with activities guided through an asset management program and both short-term, long-term and infrastructure rehabilitation is funded via utility rates.

Additionally, facility operations are through a crew of six licensed Water Treatment Plant Operators under the management of an on-site Chief Water Treatment Plant Operator.

E. Sale or Lease
E.1. Does the applicant intend to sell, lease, transfer, dedicate or otherwise convey any interest in the project or any portion of the project, underlying land, land improvements, etc funded with EDA investment assistance?
Yes (explain below) No (go to F.1.)
Note: Applicants may be asked to provide documentation that EDA’s requirements will continue to be met after the sale or lease of project property.

E.2. Is the purpose of the project to provide building space or land to a single user or multiple users? Yes, single user Yes, multiple users
Please note the number of expected users (if multiple users), the type of expected user(s) and the type of property being lease or sold (building lease, office lease, lot sale, lot lease, ground lease, etc.) E.3. Will the project or any portion of the project be leased in whole or in part? Yes (explain below) No
E.4. Will the lease(s) be for fair market value?
Yes No (explain below)
E.5. Explain the basic terms of any proposed lease(s), including planned length of the leases.

F. Industrial Parks, Commercial Parks or Similar Projects with Sites for Sale or Lease F.1. Is the purpose of the project to construct infrastructure, buildings, or other facilities to serve an industrial park, commercial park or similar project with sites for sale or lease? Yes (explain below) No (go to G.1.)
F.2. A benefitting property is generally one that obtains direct economic benefits from the EDA funded project supporting the park (or similar project). For example, if EDA funded a water line that opened service and significant development potential for six adjacent industrial parcels identified as part of City Industrial Park, each of those six parcels would be considered a benefitting property. Please check one, the benefitting properties for this project are owned by:

Applicant Private Part(ies)
Both applicant and private part(ies) Other (explain below) F.2.a. Identify below the owners of each property benefitting from the EDA funded construction, provide an estimate of the number of acres of each property and the estimated total acreage benefitting from the proposed project. Attach a map showing the EDA funded project and each benefitting property with its identified owner and acreage.

Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Note that EDA may require that the owner of the benefitting property, including private owners, agree to certain restrictions on the use of the property and may require that those restrictions survive any sale or transfer of the property.

In addition, EDA may require evidence that the private party has title to the park or site and may require the private party to provide other assurances that EDA determines are necessary to ensure the property is used in a manner consistent with project purposes. See 13 CFR § 314.3(c) and § 314.7.

G. Broadband, Internet, and Dark Fiber
G.1. Is this project for broadband infrastructure construction, including installation of conduit, fiber optic cable and/or related equipment such as network switches and backhaul, pole attachments, towers, or the acquisition of an indefeasible right of use?
Yes (explain below) No (go to H.)
G.2. Does the applicant understand and agree to comply with the requirements of the Federal Communications Commission and any other Federal requirements applicable to broadband projects?
Yes No
G.3. EDA regulations require recipients to provide a security interest in significant items of tangible personal property, which may include fixtures, acquired with EDA investment assistance. For broadband projects, this may include a security interest in the fixed fiber optic cable, other broadband assets, and indefeasible rights of use. This should be a first priority lien.

Will the applicant be able to provide the required security interest? Yes No (explain below)
G.4. Will the applicant be the operator of the broadband infrastructure? Yes (explain below; skip G.5.) No (go to G.5.)
If yes, explain your plan for long-term operations, maintenance and use of the broadband infrastructure.

G.5. Explain who will be the operator of the broadband infrastructure and whether it will be available to a single internet service provider or multiple internet service providers.

G.6. Provide a brief description of the current internet services in the area, including providers and their standard download/upload speeds.

G.7. List any agreements the applicant will need to enter into for broadband operations such as indefeasible rights of use, pole attachment agreements, access agreements, operator agreements, etc.

H. Environmental and Historic Preservation Requirements Please attach an environmental narrative and applicant certification clause using the template found on www.eda.gov.

Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Federal agencies are required by law to assess the expected environmental impacts associated with proposed federal actions. Depending on its analysis of information submitted by the applicant, EDA may request additional information to better understand the current environmental conditions and the project elements that will affect the environment.

Comprehensive information is required to complete an environmental review in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). Information must be provided for the:
(i) site where the proposed project facilities will be constructed and the surrounding areas affected by its operation; and
(ii) areas to be affected by any primary beneficiaries of the project. (iii) The information submitted must be sufficient to evaluate all reasonable alternatives to the proposed project and the direct and indirect environmental impacts of the project, as well as the cumulative impacts on the environment as defined in the regulations for implementing the procedural provisions of NEPA. See 40 C.F.R. parts 1500-1508.

The level of detail should be commensurate with the complexity and size of the project and the magnitude of the expected impact. Previously completed environmental impact documentation (assessments, impact statements, etc.) for activities in the region in which the proposed project will be located may be referenced and attached to the environmental narrative as this documentation may be helpful. However, it is important that each section of the environmental narrative addresses the proposed EDA project.

Please note regardless of whether the applicant believes historic or archaeological artifacts are present, the applicant may be required to work directly with its State Historic Preservation Officer (SHPO) or Tribal Historic Preservation Officer (THPO) for projects on Tribal lands where there is a designated THPO. The SHPO and THPO clearance processes can be lengthy. Please reach out to EDA to start the process as early as possible. A good early step is to familiarize yourself with the SHPO or THPO websites, which generally explain the processes and requirements. There are also trainings and additional resources available through the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP) website.

OMB Number: 0610-0094
Expiration Date: 10/31/2024
ED-900E – Calculation of Estimated
Relocation and Land Acquisition
Expenses
All applicants that are including relocation and land acquisition expenses in the EDA project budget must complete the "Calculation of Estimated Relocation and Land Acquisition Expenses" form (below), and enter the “Grand Total Relocation Expenses” on line item 3 (“Relocation expenses and payments") of Form SF-424C, 'Budget Information - Construction Programs.' Note: The “Costs Incidental to Land Acquisition” are separate from the estimated purchase price of the property.

ITEM 1. COSTS INCIDENTAL TO LAND ACQUISITION - ESTIMATES Number of land transactions involved (including options, easements and rights-of-way):

Recording fees, transfer taxes, surveys, appraisals, title search and similar expenses-Section 303(1)
Penalty costs-Section 303(2)
Real Property taxes-Section 303(3)
Litigation expenses-Section 304(a)
Total - Estimated costs incidental to transfer of title ITEM 2. RELOCATION - ESTIMATES
a. TENANTS - Estimates: Number of Claims
(1) Moving Expenses:

Actual Expenses-Section 202(a)(1)
In lieu payments-Section 202(b)
Total - Moving Expenses
(2) Replacement housing payments:

Rental payments-Section 204(1)
Down payment-Section 204(2)
Total - Replacement housing payments
Total - Estimated Tenants
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
b. OWNER-OCCUPANTS - Estimates: Number of Claims
(1) Moving Expenses:

Actual Expenses-Section 202(a)(1)
In lieu payments-Section 202(b)
Total - Moving Expenses
(2) Replacement housing payments:

Purchase payments-Section 203(a)(1)
Reasonable replacement costs-Section 203(a)(1)(A)
Increased interest costs-Section 203(a)(1)(B)
Closing costs-Section 203(a)(1)(C)
Rental payments-Section 204(1)
Down payment-Section 204(2)
Total - Replacement housing payments
Total - Estimated Owner-Occupants
c. BUSINESS - Estimates: Number of Claims
Moving Expenses:

Actual Expenses-Section 202(a)(1)
Actual loss of tangible personal property-Section 202(a)(2) Actual searching expenses-Section 202(a)(3)
In lieu payments-Section 202(c)
Total - Estimated Farm Operations
f. ADVISORY SERVICES - Estimates: Number of Claims
Total - Expenses of grantee/borrower-Section 205
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 g. ADMINISTRATION - Estimates: Number of Claims
Contracting with individual, firm, association, or corporation-Section 212 Agreement w/ Federal or State government agency or instrumentalitySection 212 Total - Estimated Administration
ITEM 3. GRAND TOTAL
Enter the sum of Items 1 and 2 (parts (a) through (g)) in this Item

GRAND TOTAL RELOCATION EXPENSES
0 0
0 0
OMB Number: 4040-0004
Expiration Date: 12/31/2022
* 1. Type of Submission: * 2. Type of Application:
* 3. Date Received: 4. Applicant Identifier:
5a. Federal Entity Identifier: 5b. Federal Award Identifier:

6. Date Received by State: 7. State Application Identifier:
* a. Legal Name:
* b. Employer/Taxpayer Identification Number (EIN/TIN): * c. Organizational DUNS:
* Street1:

Street2:
* City:

County/Parish:
* State:

Province:
* Country:
* Zip / Postal Code:

Department Name: Division Name:

Prefix: * First Name:

Middle Name:
* Last Name:

Suffix:

Title:

Organizational Affiliation:
* Telephone Number: Fax Number:
* Email:
* If Revision, select appropriate letter(s):
* Other (Specify):

State Use Only:

8. APPLICANT INFORMATION:
d. Address:
e. Organizational Unit:
f. Name and contact information of person to be contacted on matters involving this application:

Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
Preapplication
Application
Changed/Corrected Application
New
Continuation
Revision
Completed by Grants.gov upon submission.

USA: UNITED STATES
City of Roseville
Roseville
California
Environmental Utilities
Sean
Bigley
Assistant Environmental Utilities Director
Water Utility and Government Relations
(916) 774-5513
[email protected]
2005 Hilltop Circle
95747
96-4000409 076119643
* 9. Type of Applicant 1: Select Applicant Type:

Type of Applicant 2: Select Applicant Type:

Type of Applicant 3: Select Applicant Type:
* Other (specify):
* 10. Name of Federal Agency:

11. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number:

CFDA Title:
* 12. Funding Opportunity Number:
* Title:

13. Competition Identification Number:

Title:

14. Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.):
* 15. Descriptive Title of Applicant's Project:

Attach supporting documents as specified in agency instructions.

Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
Add Attachments Delete Attachments View Attachments
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
Economic Development Administration
Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Energy and Storage System Project PWEAA2020
FY2020 EDA Public Works and Economic Adjustment Assistance Programs including CARES Act Funding
City or Township Gvernment
* a. Federal
* b. Applicant
* c. State
* d. Local
* e. Other
* f. Program Income
* g. TOTAL
.

Prefix: * First Name:

Middle Name:
* Last Name:

Suffix:
* Title:
* Telephone Number:
* Email:

Fax Number:
* Signature of Authorized Representative: * Date Signed:

18. Estimated Funding ($):

21. *By signing this application, I certify (1) to the statements contained in the list of certifications** and (2) that the statements herein are true, complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge. I also provide the required assurances** and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims may subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties. (U.S. Code, Title 218, Section 1001) ** The list of certifications and assurances, or an internet site where you may obtain this list, is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions.

Authorized Representative:

Application for Federal Assistance SF-424
* a. Applicant
Attach an additional list of Program/Project Congressional Districts if needed. * b. Program/Project
* a. Start Date: * b. End Date:

16. Congressional Districts Of:

17. Proposed Project:

Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on b. Program is subject to E.O. 12372 but has not been selected by the State for review. c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372.

Yes No
Add Attachment Delete Attachment View Attachment
** I AGREE
Completed by Grants.gov upon submission.
* 20. Is the Applicant Delinquent On Any Federal Debt? (If "Yes," provide explanation in attachment.) * 19. Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 Process? Completed by Grants.gov upon submission.

If "Yes", provide explanation and attach
11/2022 12/2024
$4,925,776
$0
$0
$0
$6,592,877
CA-004 CA-004
$1,667,101
$1,667,101
OMB Number: 4040-0008
Expiration Date: 02/28/2025
BUDGET INFORMATION - Construction Programs
NOTE: Certain Federal assistance programs require additional computations to arrive at the Federal share of project costs eligible for participation. If such is the case, you will be notified.

COST CLASSIFICATION a. Total Cost

FEDERAL FUNDING
b. Costs Not Allowable
for Participation
c. Total Allowable Costs
(Columns a-b)

1. Administrative and legal expenses2. Land, structures, rights-of-way, appraisals, etc.3. Relocation expenses and payments4. Architectural and engineering fees5. Other architectural and engineering fees6. Project inspection fees7. Site work8. Demolition and removal9. Construction10. Equipment11. Miscellaneous12. SUBTOTAL (sum of lines 1-11)14. SUBTOTAL15. Project (program) income

17. Federal assistance requested, calculate as follows:
(Consult Federal agency for Federal percentage share.)Enter the resulting Federal share.

16. TOTAL PROJECT COSTS (subtract #15 from #14)13. Contingencies Enter eligible costs from line 16c Multiply X
$$$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$
$$
%
$$$$$$
$$$$$$
$$$$$$$$
$
435,657.00 435,657.00
299,400.0049,900.00416,160.00998,000.00399,200.00249,500.00 435,657.00
299,400.0049,900.00416,160.00998,000.00399,200.00249,500.00 80 3,742,060.006,343,377.006,592,877.006,592,877.00
3,742,060.006,343,377.006,592,877.006,157,220.004,925,776.00 OMB Number: 4040-0009
Expiration Date: 02/28/2022

ASSURANCES - CONSTRUCTION PROGRAMS

PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR COMPLETED FORM TO THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET. SEND IT TO THE ADDRESS PROVIDED BY THE SPONSORING AGENCY.

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 15 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0042), Washington, DC 20503.

Certain of these assurances may not be applicable to your project or program. If you have questions, please contact the Awarding Agency. Further, certain Federal assistance awarding agencies may require applicants to certify to additional assurances. If such is the case, you will be notified.

As the duly authorized representative of the applicant:, I certify that the applicant:

NOTE:

1. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance, and the institutional, managerial and financial capability (including funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share of project costs) to ensure proper planning,
management and completion of project described in
this application.

2. Will give the awarding agency, the Comptroller General of the United States and, if appropriate, the State,
the right to examine all records, books, papers, or
documents related to the assistance; and will establish a proper accounting system in accordance with
generally accepted accounting standards or agency
directives.

3. Will not dispose of, modify the use of, or change the terms of the real property title or other interest in the site and facilities without permission and instructions from the awarding agency. Will record the Federal
awarding agency directives and will include a covenant
in the title of real property acquired in whole or in part with Federal assistance funds to assure nondiscrimination during the useful life of the project.

4. Will comply with the requirements of the assistance
awarding agency with regard to the drafting, review and approval of construction plans and specifications.

5. Will provide and maintain competent and adequate
engineering supervision at the construction site to
ensure that the complete work conforms with the
approved plans and specifications and will furnish
progressive reports and such other information as may be required by the assistance awarding agency or State.

6. Will initiate and complete the work within the applicable time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding agency.

7. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents the appearance of personal or organizational
conflict of interest, or personal gain.

8. Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. §§4728-4763) relating to prescribed
standards of merit systems for programs funded
under one of the 19 statutes or regulations specified in Appendix A of OPM's Standards for a Merit System of
Personnel Administration (5 C.F.R. 900, Subpart F).

9. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning
Prevention Act (42 U.S.C. §§4801 et seq.) which
prohibits the use of lead-based paint in construction or rehabilitation of residence structures.

10. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondiscrimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352)
which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race,
color or national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. §§1681
1683, and 1685-1686), which prohibits discrimination
on the basis of sex; (c) Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29) U.S.C.
§794), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of
handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as
amended (42 U.S.C. §§6101-6107), which prohibits
discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug Abuse
Office and Treatment Act of 1972 (P.L. 92-255), as
amended relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of
drug abuse; (f) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation
Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to
nondiscrimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or
alcoholism; (g) §§523 and 527 of the Public Health
Service Act of 1912 (42 U.S.C. §§290 dd-3 and 290 ee
3), as amended, relating to confidentiality of alcohol
and drug abuse patient records; (h) Title VIII of the
Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. §§3601 et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination in the sale,
rental or financing of housing; (i) any other
nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statue(s)
under which application for Federal assistance is being made; and (j) the requirements of any other
nondiscrimination statue(s) which may apply to the
application.

Previous Edition Usable Authorized for Local Reproduction Standard Form 424D (Rev. 7-97) Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102
View Burden Statement

11. Will comply, or has already complied, with the
requirements of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable treatment of persons displaced or whose property is
acquired as a result of Federal and federally-assisted
programs. These requirements apply to all interests in real property acquired for project purposes regardless of
Federal participation in purchases.

12. Will comply with the provisions of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§1501-1508 and 7324-7328) which limit the political
activities of employees whose principal employment
activities are funded in whole or in part with Federal funds.

13. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the DavisBacon Act (40 U.S.C. §§276a to 276a-7), the Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. §276c and 18 U.S.C. §874), and the Contract
Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. §§327-
333) regarding labor standards for federally-assisted
construction subagreements.

14. Will comply with flood insurance purchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 (P.L. 93-234) which requires recipients in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insurable construction and acquisition is $10,000 or more.

15. Will comply with environmental standards which may be prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of environmental quality control measures under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (P.L. 91-
190) and Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification
of violating facilities pursuant to EO 11738; (c)
protection of wetlands pursuant to EO 11990; (d)
evaluation of flood hazards in floodplains in accordance with EO 11988; (e) assurance of project consistency
with the approved State management program
developed under the Coastal Zone Management Act of
1972 (16 U.S.C. §§1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of
Federal actions to State (Clean Air) implementation
Plans under Section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act of
1955, as amended (42 U.S.C. §§7401 et seq.); (g)
protection of underground sources of drinking water
under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974, as
amended (P.L. 93-523); and, (h) protection of
endangered species under the Endangered Species
Act of 1973, as amended (P.L. 93-205).

16. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of
1968 (16 U.S.C. §§1271 et seq.) related to protecting
components or potential components of the national
wild and scenic rivers system.

17. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act of 1966, as amended (16 U.S.C. §470), EO 11593
(identification and protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and Historic Preservation Act of
1974 (16 U.S.C. §§469a-1 et seq).

18. Will cause to be performed the required financial and compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit
Act Amendments of 1996 and OMB Circular No. A-133,
"Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit
Organizations."

19. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other Federal laws, executive orders, regulations, and policies governing this program.

SIGNATURE OF AUTHORIZED CERTIFYING OFFICIAL TITLE
SF-424D (Rev. 7-97) Back

APPLICANT ORGANIZATION DATE SUBMITTED
Completed on submission to Grants.gov
Completed on submission to Grants.gov

20. Will comply with the requirements of Section 106(g) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000, as amended (22 U.S.C. 7104) which prohibits grant award
recipients or a sub-recipient from (1) Engaging in severe forms of trafficking in persons during the period of time that the award is in effect (2) Procuring a commercial
sex act during the period of time that the award is in
effect or (3) Using forced labor in the performance of the award or subawards under the award.

DocuSign Envelope ID: 55C23F01-A393-4B74-B0DA-51662CF61481 OMB Number: 0610-0094
Expiration Date: 11/30/2021
ED-900B – Beneficiary Information Form
A. General Information
A.1. Proposed EDA Project Title:
proposed by Lead Applicant:

A.2. Beneficiary Organization Name:

A.3. Beneficiary Organization Address:

Street 1:

Street 2:

City:

County:

State:

Province:

Country:

Zip/Postal Code:

A.4. Please characterize the main industry/field of this beneficiary organization including the 6-digit NAICS code for the products and services produced by the organization:

B. Estimated Impact of the EDA Investment
B.1. As indicated in the table below, as a direct result of the proposed scope of work, will be able to create and/or save jobs and/or generate private investment.
622110
Jobs Created Jobs Saved Private Investment
0 0 0
Sutter Roseville Medical Center operates employs 3,361 people. Sutter Roseville operates 24 hours/day, 7days per week year around and safe, clean water is a necessity to adequately providing medical treatment in a hospital setting. Ensuring Roseville’s healthcare facilities have consistent access to that water allow those facilities to have greater flexibility and capacity to respond to ongoing and future crises (e.g., public health emergencies and pandemics natural disasters grid failure) B.2. Please identify the basis for the estimated number of jobs that will be created or saved for your organization?
Sutter Roseville Medical
Roseville
CA
95661
USA: UNITED STATES
City of Roseville, Environmental Utility
Solar Energy and Storage System Project, Barton Road Water Treatment Plant 1 Medical Plaza Drive
DocuSign Envelope ID: 55C23F01-A393-4B74-B0DA-51662CF61481 Brian Alexander Chief Executive Officer
B.3. What types of private investment are likely to be generated? In 2020 Sutter Roseville Medical Center completed a 98,000 square foot expansion which added 24 new intensive care unit beds and 34 new emergency beds. This resulted in the facility having the largest emergency department in Sutter Health’s 24 hospital system. Current and future expansion or locations of services would not be possible without the infrastructure planning and investments made by the City of Roseville.

B.4. Please describe the timeframe associated with the jobs and private investment identified in the table above:

In response to Covid-19 and the growth of the Sacramento region, Sutter Roseville continues to hire employees to keep up with demand. Placer County is one of four counties that experienced population growth in 2021 and investment in our current facilities will occur with consistent population growth and demand.

B.5. Are there other ways that this project will benefit your business or organization? Clean and reliable supply of water is a necessity to Sutter Roseville’s operations and our ability to service our regional customer base. Any interruption of utilities to the facility would be a disaster to operations. Well planned infrastructure and upgrading investments to Roseville’s utilities provides our company the confidence to service our customers and expand operations.

C. Provision of Data on the EDA Investment
The Economic Development Administration (EDA) tracks job and private investment resulting from its awards.

If this application results in an award, each beneficiary must provide to the successful recipient job and private investment results up to 9 years after the EDA grant award in order to assist the grantee with fulfilling these reporting requirements.

Check box to indicate that your company intends to provide the recipient with information on jobs and private investment generated as a result of the EDA project.

Date
2/24/2022
Name and title of beneficiary organization authorizedrepresentative Name Title
Signature of authorized representative for the beneficiary organization DocuSign Envelope ID: 55C23F01-A393-4B74-B0DA-51662CF61481 Brian Alexander Chief Executive Officer
D. Assurances by Beneficiary that is an "Other Party"
An authorized or corporate representative of any beneficiary that is considered an “Other Party” as defined below, must also sign to show that the beneficiary intends to comply with the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) and EDA regulations described below.

As defined at 13 C.F.R. § 302.20(b)(1), an “Other Party” is an entity that intends to create or save 15 or more permanent jobs as a result of this EDA-supported project and is specifically named in the application as benefiting from the project or will be located in a building; port; facility; or industrial, commercial, or business park constructed or improved in whole or in part with EDA investment assistance prior to EDA's final disbursement of funds.

By submitting these assurances, the Other Party certifies that it will comply with the following requirements:
• Section 601 of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.), and the DOC's implementing regulations at 15 C.F.R. part 8, which proscribe discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin.
• 42 U.S.C. 3123, 42 U.S.C. 6709, and the DOC’s regulations at 15 C.F.R. part 8a, which proscribe discrimination on the basis of sex.
• Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. 794), and the DOC’s implementing regulations at 15 C.F.R. part 8b, which proscribe discrimination on the basis of disabilities. • The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq.), and the DOC’s implementing regulations at 15 C.F.R. part 20, which proscribe discrimination on the basis of age.

Signature of authorized representative for the beneficiary ("Other Party") entity Date 2/24/2022
Name and title of beneficiary organization authorizedrepresentative Name Title
DocuSign Envelope ID: 55C23F01-A393-4B74-B0DA-51662CF61481 Instructions for the ED-900B – Beneficiary
Information Form
This form must be completed as provided by EDA’s policies and at a minimum by an authorized or corporate representative of the identified beneficiary organization whose position reflects the authority required to make these assurances (such as the authority to hire employees). Legal authorization for a corporate official may be specified in the Corporation’s or LLC’s formation documentation, bylaws, or similar document and under the laws governing the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam and the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands. In the case of an individual executing this form as a sole proprietor or private owner, the sole proprietor’s or owner’s role and position must be indicated. For other circumstances, please contact your Regional Office.

A. General Information

1. Enter the title of the proposed EDA project and the lead applicant.

2. Enter the name of the organization that is a “committed beneficiary” in the application for EDA assistance. Note that a separate form must be completed by each identified “committed beneficiary.”

3. Enter the address of the organization in #2.

4. Please characterize the main industry/field for the beneficiary organization. A searchable list of North American industries is available at http://www.census.gov/eos/www/naics/.

B. Estimated Impact of the EDA Investment
This section should be completed by each beneficiary of the proposed project that has been identified as “committed” by the EDA applicant.

For the purposes of completing the table in this section • Jobs created means that as a direct result of this project, these jobs will be generated. • Jobs saved means that without this project, the jobs listed here would be lost.

Only long-term, full-time direct jobs should be listed in the table. Part-time jobs should be converted to full-time equivalents (sum the total part-time hours worked per week and divide by the hourly work week for full-time employees, normally 35-40 hours).
• Private Investment means the total private sector capital investment made because of the EDAinvestment, including investments in new plant and equipment. Do not report private sector contributions to project construction or loan fund capitalization reported above in this section.

C. Provision of Data on the EDA Investment
This section should be completed by each beneficiary of the proposed project that has been identified as “committed” by the EDA applicant.

D. Assurances by Beneficiary that is an "Other Party"
Any beneficiary that meets the definition of "Other Party" that will create or save 15 or more permanent jobs as a result of the EDA investment, must have an authorized representative for the beneficiary "Other Party" organization complete Section D.

February 14, 2022
Dominick Casey
City Manager
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Dear Mr. Casey,
Adventist Health is pleased to offer support of the City of Roseville’s Solar Energy and Storage System Project at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant.

The City of Roseville’s Environmental Utilities Department’s continuous focus on investments to ensure that our water infrastructure is resilient and can withstand external threats now and into the future is crucial to our operations. Resilient water infrastructure is critical to maintaining and growing Roseville and the region’s economy and gives businesses like ours a solid foundation for success always knowing that there will be access to clean and safe drinking water – no matter what.

One of the alternatives the City of Roseville is pursuing is the permitting, design and construction of a 1,000 kW Solar Energy Array and 500 kw Battery Storage System at the City of Roseville’s WTP which would allow the WTP to operate independently of the grid for up to four days.

Therefore, Adventist Health enthusiastically supports the City of Roseville bringing this important water resiliency and reliability project to fruition and encourages the Economic Development Administration to support the City with federal funding for this critical project.

Sincerely,
Julia Drefke
Public Affairs Executive
Adventist Health
October 27, 2021
Dominick Casey
City Manager
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Dear Mr. Casey,
The Greater Sacramento Economic Council is pleased to offer its enthusiastic support of the City of Roseville’s Solar Energy and Storage System Project at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant.

The City of Roseville’s Environmental Utilities Department’s impressive focus on investments to ensure that the water infrastructure is resilient to external threats is crucial to attract and retain businesses.

Resilient water infrastructure is critical to maintaining and growing Roseville and the region’s economy and gives businesses access to clean and safe water for consumption and industrial purposes is paramount to a healthy and thriving community.

One of the alternatives the City of Roseville is pursuing is the permitting, design, and construction of a 1,000 kW Solar Energy Array and 500 kw Battery Storage System at the City of Roseville’s WTP which would allow the WTP to operate independently of the grid for up to four days.

The Greater Sacramento Economic Council supports the City of Roseville bringing this important water resiliency and reliability project to reality and encourages the Economic Development Administration to support the City with federal funding for this critical infrastructure project.

Sincerely,
Scott Powell
Executive Vice President
Public Affairs Department
Sacramento and Roseville Service Area
1650 Response Road
Sacramento, CA 95815
Phone: 916-614-4525
Fax: 916-614-4474
February 24, 2022
Dominick Casey
City Manager
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Re: Support for the City of Roseville Solar Energy and Storage System Project Dear Mr. Casey:

Kaiser Permanente is pleased to support the City of Roseville’s grant application to the Economic Development Administration for the Solar Energy and Storage System Project at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant.

The City of Roseville serves 130,000 residents and businesses with high quality drinking water. The Barton Road Water Treatment plant is the sole surface water treatment plant for the city with a capacity to treat 100 million gallons per day.

In recent years, power reliability to the plant has been reduced, making a dependable backup supply important to maintain drinking water for the city. When completed, this project will include construction of a 1,000 kW solar energy array and 500 kW batter storage system, allowing the plant to operate independently of the power grid for up to four days.

For more than 70 years, our mission at Kaiser Permanente has been to improve the health of our members and the communities we serve by delivering outstanding quality care and personalized service.

Part of our effort to improve our communities is to support worthy projects that enhance economic development and increase the quality of life.

Kaiser Permanente is in full support of the City of Roseville’s request for funding for the Solar Energy and Storage System Project at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant.

Sincerely,

Kimberly Menzel, RN, MHA, NEA-BC
Senior Vice President and Area Manager
Roseville Medical Center

October 13, 2021
Dominick Casey
City Manager
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Dear Mr. Casey,
Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG) is pleased to offer support of the City of Roseville’s Solar Energy and Storage System Project at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant.

Out of concern for these emerging energy reliability issues, the City of Roseville hired a professional consultant to examine these energy reliability threats and offer potential energy reliability solutions. One of the alternatives the City of Roseville is pursuing is the permitting, design and construction of a 1,000 kW Solar Energy Array and 500 kw Battery Storage System at the City of Roseville’s WTP which would allow the WTP to operate independently of the grid for up to four days.

Therefore, SACOG enthusiastically supports the City of Roseville bringing this important water resiliency and reliability project to fruition and encourages the Economic Development Administration to support the City with federal funding for this critical project.

Sincerely,
James Corless
Executive Director
Sacramento Area Council of Governments
February 17, 2022
Dominick Casey
City Manager
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Dear Mr. Casey,
Sun City Roseville Community Association is pleased to offer support of the City of Roseville’s Solar Energy and Storage System Project at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant. The City of Roseville’s Environmental Utilities Department’s continuous focus on investments to ensure that our water infrastructure is resilient and can withstand external threats now and into the future is crucial to our operations. Resilient water infrastructure is critical to maintaining and growing Roseville and the region’s economy and gives businesses like ours a solid foundation for success always knowing that there will be access to clean and safe drinking water – no matter what.

Therefore, Sun City Roseville Community Association enthusiastically supports the City of Roseville bringing this important water resiliency and reliability project to fruition and encourages the Economic Development Administration to support the City with federal funding for this critical project.

Sincerely,
Earl Wiklund
Executive Director
Sun City Roseville Community Association
February 11, 2022
Dominick Casey
City Manager
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Dear Mr. Casey,
Sutter Health has a long history of enhancing the well-being of people in the communities we serve, through a not-for-profit commitment to compassion and excellence in health care services. With this mission as our focus, Sutter Health and Sutter Roseville Medical Center is proud to offer support of the City of Roseville’s Solar Energy and Storage System Project at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant.

The City of Roseville’s Environmental Utilities Department’s continuous focus on investments to ensure that our water infrastructure is resilient and can withstand external threats now and into the future is crucial to our operations. Resilient water infrastructure is critical to maintaining our community’s health and wellbeing, and growing Roseville and the region’s economy. It gives our city a solid foundation for success always knowing that there will be access to clean and safe drinking water.

Recently, the State of California, specifically those served in PG&E service territory have experienced energy rolling blackouts due to extreme hot temperatures and wildfire danger. While almost all Roseville’s water infrastructure is served by the very reliable Roseville Electric Utility, Roseville’s Water Treatment Plant, located in Granite Bay, CA is served by PG&E. Out of concern for these emerging energy reliability issues, the City of Roseville hired a professional consultant to examine these energy reliability threats and offer potential energy reliability solutions.

One of the alternatives the City of Roseville is pursuing is the permitting, design and construction of a 1,000 kW Solar Energy Array and 500 kw Battery Storage System at the City of Roseville’s WTP, which would allow the WTP to operate independently of the grid for up to four days.

Sutter Health enthusiastically supports the City of Roseville bringing this important water resiliency and reliability project to fruition.

Sincerely,
Brian Alexander
Chief Executive Officer
Sutter Roseville Medical Center
DocuSign Envelope ID: EB58E512-9AE9-4C24-BE6D-BA6931EC7783

Founding Emeritus
Len McCandliss
James McClatchy
Gordon Schaber
Board of Directors
Chair
Trish Rodriguez
Vice Chair
Naaz Alikhan
Treasurer
Louise Walker
Directors
David Cheney
George Claire
John Costa
Linda Cutler
Jeff Dorso
William Duncan
Cate Dyer
Gayle Garbolino-Mojica
Shawn Harrison
Chet Hewitt
James Jordan
Brian King
Paul Lau
Gina Lujan Armstrong
Michael Lynch
Garry Maisel
Gary May
Michael Marion
Jahmal Miller
Chelsea Minor
Robert S. Nelsen
Clay Nutting
Meghan Phillips
Randy Sater
Scott Shapiro
Erica Taylor
Chief Executive
Evan Schmidt
Managing Director
Trish Kelly
Alan Lange
April 21, 2022
Dominick Casey
City Manager
City of Roseville
311 Vernon Street
Roseville, CA 95678
Dear Mr. Casey,
Valley Vision is very pleased to offer support of the City of Roseville’s Solar Energy and Storage System Project at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant.

The City of Roseville’s Environmental Utilities Department’s continuous focus on investments to ensure that the City’s water infrastructure is resilient and can withstand external threats now and into the future is crucial. Resilient water infrastructure is critical to maintaining and growing Roseville and the region’s economy and will provide businesses, anchor institutions and others with the certainty that there will be access to clean and safe drinking water – no matter what.

Valley Vision is a regional civic leadership nonprofit serving the Greater Sacramento region, co-managing the region’s Greater Sacramento Region Prosperity Strategy which also serves as the region’s EDA-designated Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS). The CEDS is focused on three principal goals: improve business, support people, and develop place. The strategy’s approach is designed to catalyze a strong, inclusive, innovative and resilient economy for the Greater Sacramento region. Projects which meet the goals of the CEDS are eligible for EDA funding and other federal funding. Infrastructure which contributes to these goals, including supporting the CEDS’ key industry clusters, is a strong priority.

Recently, areas across the State of California, specifically those served in PG&E service territory, have experienced energy rolling blackouts due to extreme hot temperatures and wildfire danger.

While almost all Roseville’s water infrastructure is served by the very reliable Roseville Electric Utility, Roseville’s Water Treatment Plant, located in Granite Bay, CA is served by PG&E.

The Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Energy and Storage System Project aligns with several key initiatives of the CEDS, including supporting the life sciences, food and agriculture and future mobility industry clusters; future-oriented infrastructure; business friendly environment; and innovation and entrepreneurship. The Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Energy and Storage System Project is a resiliency investment to reduce future energy disruption risk to the City’s water infrastructure. Completion of the project will provide protection to the water treatment plant that not only serves the Roseville community but also major regional hospitals and manufacturers. The Project will contribute to meeting California's renewable portfolio standards as well as federal mandates around renewable energy. Through more consistent use of the new solar array with a BESS, Barton Road WTP has the potential to be "net zero," powered by clean energy as a direct result of the Project. As such, this project will be a strong demonstration of innovative infrastructure that will enhance the region’s competitiveness through climate-smart investments and promoting the region as a solution provider for a clean economy.

Valley Vision enthusiastically supports the City of Roseville bringing this important water resiliency and reliability project to fruition and encourages the Economic Development Administration to support the City with federal funding for this critical project.

Sincerely,
Evan Schmidt
CEO
Preliminary Engineering Report
Appendix A. PG&E Carbon Footprint Calculator Assumptions 1 Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Carbon Footprint Calculator
Assumptions
General Information

1. Typical PG&E Residential Customer – Monthly Household Energy Use1 – Electricity Usage: 540 kilowatt-hours (kWh)
– Natural Gas Usage: 45 therms (winter 60 / summer 24)

2. ClimateSmart Rates1
– Electricity: $0.00254 per kWh
– Natural Gas: $0.06528 per therm

3. PG&E Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Rates2
– Electric: 0.524 lbs CO2 per kWh
– Natural Gas: 13.446 lbs CO2 per therm
Minimizing Your Carbon Footprint – Estimated Avoided CO2 Emissions

1. Switch to Compact Fluorescent Light Bulbs
Avoid 34 lbs CO2 per bulb per year
Assumptions:
– Compares a 100-watt incandescent bulb to a 23-watt compact fluorescent. – Lighting used 2.34 hours per day.3
– PG&E emissions rate (electric): 0.524 lbs CO2 per kWh.

2. Install an Energy-Efficient Clothes Washer
Avoid 260 lbs CO2 per year
Assumptions:
– Avoid up to 15 therms per year and up to 128 kilowatt-hours per year. – Based on California Energy Commission-rated Tier 3, 2.65 cubic feet clothes washer supplied by a gas water heater. Savings will vary greatly depending upon number of loads and size of washer, whether front- or top-loading, and whether electricity or natural gas is used for water heating.
– PG&E emissions rate (natural gas): 13.446 lbs CO2 per therm. – PG&E emissions rate (electric): 0.524 lbs CO2 per kWh.

3. Purchase an Energy-Efficient Water Heater
Avoid 120 lbs CO2 per year
Assumptions:
– Avoid up to 9 therms per year.
– 30 to 50 gallon 0.63 Energy Factor (EF) natural gas water heater. EF is a measure of energy efficiency.
– PG&E emissions rate (natural gas): 13.446 lbs CO2 per therm.

4. Install High Efficiency Central Furnace
Avoid 1,000 lbs CO2 per year
Assumptions:
– Avoid up to 74 therms per year.
2 – Based on installation of a more efficient furnace (94% AFUE) to replace a less efficient unit (70% AFUE) of the same size (67.611 kBtuh rating). AFUE stands for Annual Fuel Utilization Efficiency and is a measure of heating efficiency on an annual basis. – PG&E emissions rate (natural gas): 13.446 lbs CO2 per therm.

5. Install Solar Electric Panels
Avoid 3,300 lbs CO2 per year

Assumptions:
– Typical residential system is 3-5 kW.
– 18% capacity factor.
– Operating 8,760 hours per year.
– PG&E emissions rate (electric): 0.524 lbs CO2 per kWh.

6. Switch to Hybrid-Electric Vehicle
Avoid 2,900 lbs CO2 per year
Assumptions:
– 12,000 miles per year for average automobile.4
– Compares hybrid-electric subcompact with comparable vehicle: 2007 Toyota Prius (46 miles per gallon average fuel efficiency) and (non-hybrid) 2007 Honda Civic (29 miles per gallon average fuel efficiency).5
– Burning 1 gallon of gasoline produces 19.4 lbs CO2.
6 Average Per Capita CO2 Emissions (Energy and Vehicle Use)

1. Average Californian
22,941 lbs CO2 per person
Assumptions:
– 2005 California Per Capita Electricity Usage: 7,032 kWh.7 – 2005 California Per Capita Natural Gas Usage: 422 therms.7 – California Emissions Rate for Delivered Electricity: 0.879 lbs CO2 per kWh.8

– Emissions Rate for Natural Gas: 13.446 lbs CO2 per therm.9

– 12,000 miles per year and 21 miles per gallon for average passenger vehicle.10 – Burning 1 gallon of gasoline produces 19.4 lbs CO2.
6 2. Average American
32,607 lbs CO2 per person
Assumptions:
– 2005 United States Per Capita Electricity Usage: 12,347 kWh.7 – 2005 United States Per Capita Natural Gas Usage: 504 therms.7 – United States Emissions Rate for Delivered Electricity: 1,363 lbs CO2 per kWh.8 – Emissions Rate for Natural Gas: 13.446 lbs CO2 per therm.9 – 2004 United States Per Capita Vehicle Usage: 464 gallons per person.7 – Burning 1 gallon of gasoline produces 19.4 lbs CO2.
6 3. Average Global Person
8,750 lbs CO2 per person11
3 Sources
1 PG&E’s ClimateSmart program, authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission in Decision 06-12-032.
2 PG&E’s ClimateSmart program, authorized by the California Public Utilities Commission in Decision 06-12-032. The most accurate measure of emissions from power generation involves calculating the emissions from each plant operating in the portfolio of generating assets for each hour of the day and year, and this can vary considerably by time of day, year, and with seasonal variations in weather.

To avoid this complex approach, it is common to approximate emissions from electric usage through the use of an average emissions rate such as the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC)-approved ClimateSmart electric emissions rate of 0.524 lbs CO2 per kWh. This reasonable approximation is based on the average emissions rate for PG&E’s electric portfolio, consistent with the emissions rate that is independently certified and registered each year with the California Climate Action Registry (see www.climateregistry.org). The CPUC-approved ClimateSmart natural gas emissions rate is 13.446 lbs CO2 per therm. 3 Database for Energy Efficient Resources, California Public Utilities Commission and California Energy Commission.
4 Emission Factors (EMFAC) Model 2007 Version 2.3, Average Annual Mileage from Air Basins in PG&E Service Territory.
5 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007 Miles-Per-Gallon Updates. 6 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Overview: Pollutants and Programs Average Carbon Dioxide Emissions Resulting from Gasoline.
7 California Energy Commission.
8 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency eGRID (Updated April 2007). 9 California Energy Commission (CEC): Inventory of California Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990 to 2002 Update, Page A-24, CEC-600-2005-025, June 2005. The average emissions rate for customer use of natural gas is 11.7 lbs CO2 per therm. For comparability purposes for this calculator, we use the CPUC-approved ClimateSmart rate of 13.446 lbs CO2 per therm, which includes both customer use and distribution of natural gas. 10 Emission Factors (EMFAC) Model 2007 Version 2.3.
11 World Resources Institute Climate Analysis Indicators Tool Version 3.0 (2002 Emissions Data), which is based on:
- U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration. 2004. International Energy Annual 2002.
- International Energy Agency. 2004. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion (2004 Edition). - Marland, G., T.A. Boden, and R. J. Andres. 2005. Global, Regional, and National Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions. in Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A.
- Population Division of the Department of Economic and Social Affairs of the United Nations Secretariat, 2005. World Population Prospects: The 2004 Revision.

Preliminary Engineering Report
Appendix B. Helioscope Solar Report
Annual Production Report produced by Daniel Ingold
© 2021 Folsom Labs 1/3 December 20, 2021
kWh
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
0 50k
100k
150k
200k
250k
Shading: 0.0%
Reflection: 3.7%
Soiling: 2.0%
Irradiance: 2.0%
Temperature: 5.9%
Mismatch: 2.8%
Wiring: 0.3%
Clipping: 0.1%
Inverters: 2.1%
AC System: 0.5%
Annual Production Report produced by Daniel Ingold
© 2021 Folsom Labs 2/3 December 20, 2021
Annual Production Report produced by Daniel Ingold
© 2021 Folsom Labs 3/3 December 20, 2021

Grant Application Development for the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Energy/BESS
Basis of Design Report
January 14, 2022
City of Roseville

Document No. i
Contents
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................................... ii

1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 1

2. Solar PV and BESS Site Location Selection ............................................................................................................... 2

2.1 Location Evaluation ...................................................................................................................................................................... 2

2.2 Site Recommendation ................................................................................................................................................................. 3

3. BESS Power and Energy Savings .................................................................................................................................. 6

4. Interconnection Options into Existing Electrical Utility Substation .................................................................... 9

5. Battery Energy Storage System Controller ............................................................................................................ 10

6. Manpower and Equipment Costs on WTP ............................................................................................................... 11

7. Environmental and Safety Protection for BESS .................................................................................................... 12 ii
Executive Summary
Jacobs was contracted by the City of Roseville (City) to provide a preliminary engineering report for a grant application for an energy resilience project (Project) at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (WTP). Based on the previous Energy Resilience Study, the project will include net metered solar Photovoltaics (PV) and a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS).

This analysis evaluates the WTP to provide a recommended approach to incorporate Solar PV and a BESS into the existing site and the existing electrical infrastructure.

To determine the best approach, Jacobs evaluated multiple aspects of the WTP facilities. The following considerations are critical to determining the optimal approach for project development:

A. Solar PV size and location
B. BESS size and location
C. Interconnection options at the existing electrical utility substation D. BESS controls and sequences of operation
E. Labor and equipment requirements
F. Environmental and safety protection for BESS
The following findings are described in the report:
 Suitable equipment locations for the Solar PV and BESS are recommended.  The annual energy consumption is analyzed. The WTP has an average demand of 172 kilowatts (kW) for an annual consumption of just over 1,500,000 kilowatt-hours per year (kWh/yr). The peak metered demand over the past three years was 384 kW.
 A solar array of approximately 1 megawatt (MW) in capacity would provide near net zero energy performance.
 A 4-megawatt hour (MWh) BESS would be the key to energy resilience, and it would require approximately 1/8 acre. This can be accommodated to the west and north of the WTP substation.

Project Assumptions
The following assumptions are made for this project:

1. There is no cost for land because the equipment can be located on the site that is currently owned by the city.

2. Minimal site civil work is required.

3. If the design requires foundations for solar canopy vertical supports exterior to the sedimentation/flocculation basin walls, there is adequate access for drill rigs, concrete deliveries, and support equipment for the construction of driller pier foundations, if needed.

4. The site is accessible for cranes to install long span solar arrays.

5. Locating BESS equipment near the substation will minimize power cable lengths.

6. There will be no significant interconnection issues or substantial costs for up to 1-MW of capacity.

7. The racking system for Solar PV will be designed for sustained wind loading and seismic events in compliance with building codes.

8. City priorities, in order, include energy resilience, demand charge management, near zero energy performance, and preservation of the environment.

9. The existing 500-kW diesel generator will be incorporated into the new standby power system. It will be sequenced to operate part time during long duration outages depending on the solar resource during the outage.
iii
Central to success for the reliability of WTP is the recognition of the five “Rs” of Resilience:

Robustness- the Solar PV and BESS is electrically protected and grounded to the strictest National Electrical Code standards. The Solar PV and BESS is designed to survive severe weather events and natural disasters.

Redundancy- the BESS is modular so that portions can readily be replaced, and new modules can be added to increase generation and storage capacity. In addition, the existing diesel generator provides redundancy.

Resourcefulness- the Solar PV and BESS project has minimal environmental impact and produces no water or air pollutants. It relies primarily on the solar resource at the site for its fuel.

Response- the Solar PV and BESS controller will actively monitor the electrical grid conditions, and if there is an outage the BESS can quickly disconnect from the grid and power up using reserve inverters within a fraction of a second to serve the load.

Recovery- the system will be sized to provide longer duration resilience with significantly less reliance on the diesel generator. The plant can be powered with the Solar PV and BESS for multiple days of normal operations with the generator being used when the solar resource is inadequate. 1 1. Introduction
The primary intent of this report is to evaluate the factors involved in implementing a Solar PV and BESS at the WTP and to recommend a practical and cost-effective strategy on which to base the design and construction of the project. This study evaluates in more detail the options for installing a Solar PV and BESS and identifies a logical approach for the City to obtain the best value system. The report will be reviewed by the City to obtain concurrence on the recommended approach. Preparation of the Preliminary Engineering Report for the grant application will follow in Task 3. 2 2. Solar PV and BESS Site Location Selection
The primary sites considered during the site visit are shown in Figure 2.1 below:

1. Sludge Lagoon 2

2. Roof mounted on water concrete storage tanks

3. Parking lot

4. Filter Deck

5. Sedimentation/flocculation basins

6. Green space south of existing infrastructure
Figure 2.1 - WTP Aerial View

2.1 Location Evaluation
Location 1
The sludge lagoon provides an open area for ease of construction, but the site is too small to provide the energy required.

Location 2
The concrete water storage tanks were proposed for use in the PV study completed in 2008. Live load capacities were provided in that report, but no source for the values was provided and we could not verify the capacity. In addition, that report recommended a 250-kW system which is a quarter of the current proposal to provide energy resilience. The tanks are also too small for the proposed system. Lastly, the 6 2
2 1
3 age of the tanks could be an issue. A contemporary PV array is expected to last 25 to 30 years and the tanks may not have that much life remaining.

Location 3
The parking lot is too small for the proposed system and would provide minimal energy.

Location 4
The filter deck is a long and narrow space that could host a solar canopy. Due to the narrow width, the size is inadequate for the required energy production.

Location 5
The sedimentation/flocculation basins provide a large enough area to produce the amount of energy required for energy resilience. The basins appear to be structurally adequate to support a long span canopy type array. This determination is based on Jacobs’ experience with similar sized arrays and the detailed design of their foundations. In addition, structural engineers from solar PV racking system companies were consulted, and based on their experience in designing racking systems, there were no concerns regarding the use of the basins. The key parameter that can be calculated during detailed design is the bay spacing for the rigid frame structure to distribute the load.

The location is accessible for construction equipment. See Figure 2.2 for an image of a crane lifting cassettes of solar modules into place on a canopy. Figure 2.3 is an example of an arched canopy-type array.

Location 6
The green space south of the plant initially appeared to be a preferred location due to the lack of other infrastructure. However, it has been determined that the registered Heritage Oak trees should be preserved.

2.2 Site Recommendation
Various combinations of Locations 1 through 4 could be combined to provide the required solar capacity.

However, the project cost would increase due to extra design efforts to design multiple systems. The construction cost would also increase due to the multiple types of systems to be installed and the need for additional routing of electrical conduits and cables to multiple sites.

The recommended site is Location 5, the sedimentation/flocculation basins, as shown in Figure 2.4. Long span canopies are recommended for installation on top of the basin walls. This application is very similar to the installation of parking canopies on the top floor of parking garages which has been done in dozens of cities. This design reduces site work requirements for the construction of foundations. The elimination of foundations also eliminates complications with excavating in the vicinity of underground utilities.

Preliminary modeling has determined that the coverage of this area could provide sufficient solar power equal to the current annual electricity consumption of the WTP. 4 Figure 2.2 - Example of installation of long span canopy trusses with solar PV modules already installed
Figure 2.3 - Example of arched roof long span canopy for solar PV 5 Figure 2.4 - Proposed Equipment Locations
Solar PV Canopy
Location
Existing
Substation
BESS
Location
6 3. BESS Power and Energy Savings
The BESS component will utilize less than 1/8 acre for a 4-MWh alternating current (AC) system. The site to the northwest of the WTP substation is flat, gravel covered, unused and there are no foreseeable plans for development as shown in Figure 3.1. The location will be checked for existing underground utilities.

The BESS modules should be mounted on concrete equipment pads of at least 12-in tall to minimize any issues after any severe rainfalls.

Figure 3.1 – Location of the BESS
The BESS portion of the project consists of multiple self-contained modular units on concrete equipment pads. This allows the system to be designed with minimal requirements for site civil work. Grading for equipment pads and trenching for the routing of electrical cables will be required, however. The routing will be selected to avoid other utility systems and roots of the oak trees. The system can be readily moved or repositioned, if needed, in the future with modifications to the electrical routing. The units have weatherproof enclosures. In addition, the modular nature of the design allows for scalability to account for possible future expansion. The BESS includes a control system, bi-directional converters (AC/DC) and lithium-ion batteries. Bi-directional converters can convert AC power to DC power for storage in the battery, and then DC power is converted back to AC power for use at the site.

The BESS can readily be charged/recharged at 8,000 cycles before replacement of the battery modules is possibly required. Battery system life is a function of the range and frequency of charging and discharging.

A battery that is discharged frequently to a very low state of charge and then recharged to a very high level will have a shorten life. A battery that is used mostly between a 40- 80 percent state of charge will Location for BESS
7 have a longer life. The battery could still be discharged and recharged over a wider range during a periodic outage, which is when it is needed the most, without significant impacts on service life.

When interconnected in line with the local Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) power grid, the BESS can monitor the power. If an outage occurs, the BESS can readily discharge at full power in less than one cycle (1/60 seconds), like an Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS).

As an example- if two converter modules of the Dynapower BTM 250 were utilized, then the instantaneous power output could be 500 kW, enough to carry the WTP loads for enough time (up to 10 hours) to allow a secondary power system to be brought online. The BESS can be setup to be recharged using grid AC power, solar DC power, or standby generator AC power.

It is recommended that the BESS include the following critical components:

Battery Technology Lithium-ion Deep Cycle
DC/AC converters Bi-directional
Capacity 500 kW; 4,000 kWh
Current Harmonics Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 1547 compliant, <5% TDD
Peak Efficiency 96% minimum, 98.5% desired
Standards compliance IEEE 1547, UL 1741 SA listing, NFPA 70 Switching time Seamless
Housing System Modular, outdoor NEMA 3R
Cooling system Redundant & independent for high ambient temp Fire protection Direct release fire detection & suppression Transformer For connection to distribution system
One example of this equipment would be the Dynapower BTM-250 (Figure 3.2), which is a modular and fully integrated energy storage system that couples an MPS-250kW smart inverter with Samsung SDI E2 batteries. Multiple units of the BTM-250 can be connected in parallel to provide the required capacity. The individual modular units have a footprint of approximately 13-ft by 6.5-ft. The shipping weight for each unit with the batteries is 4,400 kg (9,800 lbs.).

Figure 3.2 - Dynapower BTM-250
8 For the BESS it is recommended that modular units for the converter, the controller, and the battery storage be utilized. Figure 3.3 is an example of a modular unit with NEMA 3R enclosures. These are available from Dynapower, SMA, LG, Siemens, Caterpillar, and others.

Figure 3.3 - Example of weathertight containers for BESS components 9 4. Interconnection Options into Existing Electrical Utility Substation
Electric power is supplied by PG&E and distributed to the WTP substation via 12.8 kV overhead transmission lines. Jacobs will confirm this distribution voltage with PG&E.

The WTP substation is owned by the City of Roseville and there are currently two spare connection spaces available. The substation is near the proposed solar PV and BESS facilities, so the wiring run length is minimized.

The distribution side of the substation has available space for connection to the BESS project. 10 5. Battery Energy Storage System Controller
This BESS is the integral component for energy resilience at the WTP. During a power outage, the BESS can serve the load of the WTP, and it can be recharged by either the Solar PV system or the existing diesel generator.

During normal grid powered operations, the BESS can be used in a peak shaving mode to reduce both electrical energy cost as well as demand charges.

The BESS stores energy in DC form. It is charged by AC power from either the solar array, the standby generator, or the grid, so it requires bi-directional inverters (AC-DC for input and DC-AC for output).

Energy storage systems contain power electronics that safely and reliably transfer energy into thermally managed banks of batteries to store energy. The systems can absorb, or release energy as needed and can be tied to a power grid or integrated into a standalone microgrid. In addition to the batteries and power electronics, the hardware side of energy storage, controller components include:
 Systems Integration: software that integrates and controls all components around the battery (e.g., power conversion and thermal management).
 Economic Dispatch: software that determines when to charge and discharge the system to gain maximum economic benefit from the stored energy.

The Sequence of Operations of the Solar PV, BESS and Emergency Generator during specific power supply events are as follows:

Scenario A: Normal grid powered operations with Solar PV generation above the WTP consumption rate which is typically 100 kW to 385 kW:
 Automatic Transfer Switch is CLOSED (connected to PG&E grid).  First priority for Solar PV generation is directed to totally supplant the PG&E supply for WTP operations.  Second priority for (excess) Solar PV generated power is to recharge the BESS.  Third priority for (excess) Solar PV generated power is to be delivered to the PG&E grid and net metered.

Scenario B: Normal grid powered operations and Solar PV generation below the WTP consumption rate which is typically 100 kW to 385 kW:
 Automatic Transfer Switch is CLOSED (connected to PG&E grid).  Solar PV generation is directed to augment the PG&E supply for WTP operations.  BESS is used in peak shaving mode to reduce both electrical energy cost as well as demand charges.

BESS is to be discharged no more than 40% charge level.  PG&E supplies power as needed.

Scenario C: Grid power outage and Solar PV generation above the WTP consumption rate which is typically at 100 kW to 385 kW:
 Automatic Transfer Switch is OPEN (disconnected from PG&E grid).  First priority for solar PV generation is directed for WTP operations.  Second priority for (excess) solar PV generated power is to recharge the BESS.

Scenario D: Grid outage and Solar PV generation below the WTP consumption rate which is typically 100 kW to 385 kW:
 Automatic Transfer Switch is OPEN (disconnected from PG&E grid).  Solar PV generation is directed for WTP operations.
 BESS is used to augment the Solar PV power for usage by the WTP operations. BESS is to be discharged no more than 40% charge level.
 When BESS is less than 40% charge level, the standby diesel generator is operated. The generator is controlled to be in 85% to 95% load range. Power not consumed by the WTP operations is directed to recharging the BESS. This provides optimal generator performance and fuel consumption.  When BESS is fully charged, generator is turned off and the BESS again augments any power needs not met by the solar PV.
11 6. Manpower and Equipment Costs on WTP
The operation of the BESS is automatic, unmanned, and minimal O&M is required. The modules will need to have the HVAC equipment screens cleaned on a regular basis, and lightning protection wires checked. 12 7. Environmental and Safety Protection for BESS
The inverters and converters in the BESS are certified to UL 1741 SA and meet all necessary safety certifications. To keep these storage systems safe from damage caused by excessive heat and energy surges, there are safety features in place, including:
 Battery enclosures with full air conditioning and temperature control  Control systems
 Fire detection and suppression systems
The modules will be Outdoor NEMA rated, UL 3R and bolted onto 12-in concrete equipment pads to meet or exceed any requirements for the Placer County Building Code and prevent any water damage.

Grant Application Development for the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Energy/BESS
Preliminary Design Report
January 14, 2022
City of Roseville

Document No. i
Contents
Design Guidelines for Canopy Mounted PV System and Inverters .................................................................................... 1 Design Guidelines for Battery Energy Storage System & Controller(s) ........................................................................... 3 Sequence of Operation Using Battery Energy Storage System Controller ...................................................................... 4 Electric Production Metering ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 Code Compliance ........................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Recommended Request for Proposal Language ................................................................................................................... 7 Appendixes
Appendix A – Sedimentation/Flocculation Basin Drawings
Appendix B – Electrical One-Line Diagram
Appendix C – Preliminary Site Plan and Solar PV Array Rendering 1 Design Guidelines for Canopy Mounted PV System and Inverters Capacity: The solar array shall have the capacity to produce 1,500,000- kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity in year 5 of operation. The inverter capacity for interconnection to the distribution system shall be 1- megawatt hour (MWh). The Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) shall have a capacity of 4-MWh with alternating current (AC)/direct current (DC) hybrid 500-kilowatt (kW) inverter(s).

Location: City of Roseville (City) Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (WTP) located at 9595 Barton Rd, Granite Bay, CA
Project design elements include:
 Mounting system shall be a long span canopy system with a minimum 10-feet of clearance above the sedimentation/flocculation basins. The approximate footprint of available area is 350-feet by 175-feet, assuming a total of 61,000 square feet. The tilt angle of the canopy shall be approximately 10 degrees. A single tilt canopy is preferred.
 Canopy does not need opaque decking under solar panels. Canopies are preferred to allow diffuse sunlight underneath the structure.
 Mounting system vertical supports are to utilize existing concrete walls for the sedimentation/flocculation basins as much as possible (See Attachment A- Existing Concrete Wall Structure Information). Mounting system cannot interfere with the basins or their sediment removal system.
 Mounting system will be higher than most lighting fixtures, which are to remain in place. Light fixtures on posts that interfere with solar canopy structure are to be removed and remounted by the contractor onto canopy vertical supports as approved by owner. Additional under canopy lighting can be included at the direction of the owner.
 Mounting system design needs to meet applicable local building code requirements (City and Placer County) with respect to electrical grounding, snow, wind, and seismic factors. See the code compliance section.
 All lines interconnecting photovoltaic (PV) arrays to point of interconnection shall be underground.

The following performance criteria shall be met for solar PV array:
 Power provided shall be three-phase compatible with the onsite utility interconnect (See Attachment BPreliminary One-line Drawings for Connection Voltage and Location).  The estimated annual energy delivery shall be a minimum of 1,500,000-kWh AC/year at point of interconnection (POI).
 All PV hardware components shall be either stainless steel or aluminum. PV structural components shall be corrosion resistant (galvanized steel, stainless steel, composites, or aluminum).

PV modules shall be a commercial, off-the-shelf products, shall be Underwriter’s Laboratory (UL) listed and shall be properly installed according to manufacturer’s instructions, the National Electrical Code (NEC), and as specified herein.

The PV modules shall be installed such that the maximum amount of sunlight available year-round on a daily basis should not be obstructed.

System wiring shall be installed in accordance with the provisions of the NEC.

All modules installed in a series string shall be installed in the same plane/orientation. 2 PV modules shall have a 25-year limited warranty that modules will generate no less than 80-percent of rated output under Standard Test Conditions (STC). PV modules that do not satisfy this warranty condition shall be replaced.

The solar panel manufacturer’s warranty as a minimum shall include: No module will generate less than 90-percent of its specified minimum power when purchased. PV modules shall have a 25-year limited warranty guarantying a minimum performance of at least 80-percent of the original power for at least twenty-five (25) years.

Inverters shall be commercial off-the-shelf product, listed to UL 1741 and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) 1547, and shall be properly installed according to manufacturer’s instructions, NEC, and as specified herein.

The inverters shall have at a minimum the following features:
 Peak efficiency of 96-percent or higher
 Inverters shall have operational indicators of performance and shall have built-in data acquisition and remote monitoring capabilities.
 The inverters shall be capable of parallel operation with the existing AC power. Each inverter shall automatically synchronize its output waveform with that of Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) upon restoration of PG&E power.

Associated controls shall be properly installed according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Warning labels shall be posted on the control panels and junction boxes indicating that the circuits are energized by an alternate power source independent of PG&E-provided power.

Operating instructions shall be posted on or near the system, and on file with facilities operation and maintenance documents.

Provide detailed lock out /tag out instructions for all equipment.

Install inverters and control panels in most optimum locations with appropriate environmental protection.

Inverters mounted outside shall be shaded from direct sun from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. in the months of June to August and be able to be secured.

The inverter and system shall utilize a timer or other means to shut down the inverter during nighttime to avoid energy usage at night.

A 10-year inverter manufacturers’ warranty shall be provided.

All field electrical devices shall have the capability to be locked as appropriate.

All structural components shall be non-corrosive (galvanized steel, stainless steel, or aluminum). All hardware shall be stainless steel or aluminum. All components shall be designed to obtain a minimum 40-year design life.

Surge protection and lightning protection will be installed on all electrical systems.

3 Design Guidelines for Battery Energy Storage System & Controller(s) To ensure energy reliability and security for the WTP, a 4,000-kWh (AC) BESS is to be constructed close to the WTP Substation (see Attachment C- Preliminary Site Plan). This location is chosen to allow direct interconnection, and ease of access.

The BESS includes a control system, bi-directional inverters (AC/DC) and lithium-ion batteries. The control system shall be a microprocessor-based system that is compatible with and is connected to the WTP SCADA system to provide a graphical interface depicting system status and operation. The BESS shall be capable of being charged/recharged at 8,000 cycles before replacement of the battery modules is required.

When interconnected in line with the local PG&E power grid, the BESS shall monitor the power and if an outage occurs the BESS can readily discharge at full power in less than 1 frequency cycle (1/60 seconds), similar to an Uninterruptible Power Supply (UPS).

The BESS shall include the following critical components:

The BESS component consists of multiple self-contained modular units on concrete housekeeping pads. The units shall have weatherproof enclosures that are designed for outdoor environments. The modular design shall allow for scalability to account for future expansion.

The bi-directional inverters in the BESS must be certified to UL 1741 SA standards. The entire system must also meet NFPA 855, UL 9540A, and IEC 62619 energy storage system standards. To keep the storage systems safe from damage caused by excessive heat and energy surges, include the following features:
 Battery enclosures with full air conditioning and temperature control  Control systems
 Fire detection and suppression systems
The enclosures for the modules will be Outdoor NEMA rated, UL 3R anchor bolted onto concrete slabs with a minimum height of 12-inches above finished grade to meet or exceed any code requirements for the City and Placer County and to prevent any water infiltration.

Electric power is supplied by PG&E and distributed to the WTP substation via 12.8-kV overhead transmission lines.

The WTP substation is owned by the City, and there are currently two spare connection spaces in the substation.

The distribution side of the substation has available space for connection to the PV and BESS components.

The enclosures for the modules that house the electrical equipment for the BESS will be provided with a Lightning Protection System, comprising air terminals, down conductors, and grounding components including a grounding ring in accordance with NFPA 780 Standard for the Installation of Lightning Protection Systems.

Battery Technology Lithium-ion Deep Cycle
DC/AC converters Bidirectional
Capacity 500 kW, 4,000 kWh
Current Harmonics IEEE 1547 compliant, <5-percent TDD
Peak Efficiency 96-percent minimum, 98.5-percent desired Standards compliance IEEE 1547, UL 1741 SA listing, NFPA 70 Switching time Seamless
Housing System Modular, outdoor NEMA 3R
Cooling system Redundant & independent for high ambient temp Fire protection Direct release fire detection & suppression Transformer For connection to distribution system
4 Sequence of Operation Using Battery Energy Storage System Controller
The BESS is the integral component for energy resilience at the WTP and is required to accomplish the following sequence of operations during specific events that include the following scenarios:

Scenario A: During normal grid powered operations and solar PV generation above WTP consumption rate which is typically 100-kW to 385-kW:
 Automatic Transfer Switch is CLOSED (connected to PG&E grid).  First priority for solar PV generation is directed to totally supplant the PG&E supply for WTP operations.  Second priority for (excess) solar PV generated power is to recharge the BESS.  Third priority for (excess) solar PV generated power is to be delivered to the PG&E grid and net metered.

Scenario B: During normal grid powered operations and solar PV generation below WTP consumption rate which is typically estimated at 100-kW to 385-kW:
 Automatic Transfer Switch is CLOSED (connected to PG&E grid).  Solar PV generation is directed to augment the PG&E supply for WTP operations.  BESS is used in peak shaving mode to reduce both electrical energy cost as well as demand charges.

BESS is to be discharged no more than 40-percent charge level.  PG&E supplies power as needed.

Scenario C: During grid outage and solar PV generation above WTP consumption rate which is typically at 100- kW to 385-kW:
 Automatic Transfer Switch is OPEN (disconnected from PG&E grid).  First priority for solar PV generation is directed for WTP operations.  Second priority for (excess) solar PV generated power is to recharge the BESS.

Scenario D: During grid outage and solar PV generation below WTP consumption rate which is typically at 100- kW to 385-kW:
 Automatic Transfer Switch is OPEN (disconnected to PG&E grid).  Solar PV generation is directed for WTP operations.
 BESS is used to augment the solar PV power for usage by the WTP operations. BESS is to be discharged no more than 40-percent charge level.
 When BESS is less than 40-percent charge level, the Emergency (diesel fueled) Generator is operated.

The Emergency Generator is controlled to be in 85-percent to 95-percent load range. Power not consumed by the WTP operations is directed to recharging the BESS. This provides optimal generator performance and fuel consumption.
 When BESS is fully charged, the Emergency Generator is turned off and the BESS again augments any power needs not met by the solar PV.

Scenario E: During normal grid powered operations and solar PV generation at extremely low generation value or unavailable, and BESS at low charge rate:
 Automatic Transfer Switch is CLOSED (connected to PG&E grid).  Power from PG&E grid used for BTWTP operations
 When power requirements for WTP operations are below a demand setpoint (e.g., 150 kW), the grid is also used to recharge the BESS with an overall demand limit (WTP operations and BESS recharging) of no more than 250-kW.

Note: the PG&E grid is to be continuously monitored, and if local outage occurs, then Scenario C & D also in place until the PG&E grid is operational and a Recloser (specified and controlled by PG&E) is energized to reconnect the WTP to the grid.
5 Electric Production Metering
The project shall have at least one electric production meter (revenue quality with totalizer) for output of solar PV system.

Coordinating with PG&E, the project shall have at least one meter for use at grid interconnect, specifically to measure and report on electricity delivered (kWh) to the PG&E grid for determining net metered quantities. 6 Code Compliance
Installation and equipment shall comply with applicable building, mechanical, fire, seismic, structural, and electrical codes. Only products that are listed, tested, identified, or labeled by UL or another Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory shall be used as components in the project. Non-listed products are only permitted for use as project components when a comparable useable listed component does not exist. Nonlisted products proposed for use as components must be identified as such in all submittals.

The publications listed below form a part of this document and are hereby incorporated by reference:
 National Electrical Code (NEC), NFPA 70
 National Fire Protection Association (NFPA 855)
 UL 9540 Energy System Storage Requirements
 UL 1703 Flat – Plate PV Modules and Panels
 UL 1741 – Standard for Static Inverters and Charge Controllers for Use in Photovoltaic Power Systems  IEC 62446 Grid Connected Photovoltaic Systems- Minimum Requirements for System Documentation, Commissioning Tests, and Inspections
 IEC 62619 Energy Storage System Standards.
 ASCE-7 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures  Structural Engineers Association of California, SEAOC WIND DESIGN FOR SOLAR ARRAYS PV2-2017 Other technical codes that apply include:
 ASME PTC 50 (solar PV performance)
 ANSI Z21.83 (solar PV performance and safety)
 IEEE 1547 (interconnections)

7 Recommended Request for Proposal Language
The following sections are intended for inclusion in the Design-Build Request for Proposal.

Objective
Contractor shall provide a total “turnkey” project including all necessary equipment, materials, design, manufacturing, and installation services for the installation of a canopy mounted utility interactive photovoltaic system that shall produce a minimum of 1,500,000-kWh AC per year at the point of interconnection. The project also includes the installation and interconnection with a Battery Energy Storage System that has an output minimum of 500-kW and at least 4-MWh of battery storage.

Scope
The contractor shall perform all professional services as necessary to provide the City with a complete design package including the requirements outlined in this Statement of Work. The contractor shall install the project such that it is operational and compliant with all applicable standards, building codes, PG&E interconnection requirements, and State of California requirements. The contractor shall include specifications, calculations, and drawings in the design package, and these documents shall be turned over to the City. After approval by the City of the final design package, the contractor shall provide all necessary construction to successfully complete the photovoltaic system installation. All required commissioning and testing shall be performed, and inspections to verify code compliance and construction in accordance with the approved design shall be completed. The contractor shall obtain Permission To Operate (PTO) the system from the utility company. The Commercial Operation Date (COD) will be identified as the date that the system is fully tested and accepted and is turned over to the City for operations.

Contractor Roles and Responsibilities
The contractor is required to provide:
 Final Design
 Construction documents and engineering calculations that are signed and sealed by a licensed engineer  Submittals for materials and products
 Construction materials, equipment, and labor
 Design and construction supervision/contract management  Quality control plan
 Safety plan
 Inspections and tests
 Coordination and approval with Roseville Fire Department for BESS fire suppression system  Manuals (design calculations, operation/maintenance, shop drawing, etc.)  Commissioning and testing
 Training the City operating staff for operation and maintenance  Operation and Maintenance for first year and optional service plan after the first year  As built drawings
 Complete interconnection agreement with PG&E
City Roles and Responsibilities
 Review for approval design submittals and Quality Control Plan  Inspection to verify attainment of performance requirements  Make progress payments for design / construction as agreed 8 Concept Design Drawings
The contractor shall provide the City with concept drawings with the proposal. The drawings must indicate the proposed location of the PV array(s), the BESS and access points along with a one-line electrical diagram showing inverters, transformers, meters, and interconnection locations. All drawings shall be submitted with dimensions shown in English units.

Concept Design Information
The proposal shall include major equipment information, proposed installation/interconnection information, applicable incentive information, and performance characteristics of the entire system. Identify an appropriate location for the solar PV inverter and BESS equipment and its related components and environmental control systems that will meet the following criteria:
 Ease of maintenance and monitoring
 Efficient operation
 Low operating losses
 Secured location and hardware
At a minimum, the proposed concept information shall include:

Equipment Information:
 System description
 Selection of key equipment and layout of equipment
 Performance of equipment components, and subsystems
 Specifications for equipment procurement and installation  All engineering associated with structural and mounting details  Controls, monitors, and instrumentation
 Operation and maintenance service plan
Installation Interconnection Information:
 Solar electric array orientation (degrees)
 Solar electric module tilt (degrees)
 Electrical grid interconnection requirements
 Integration of solar PV and BESS system with other power sources  System type and mode of operation (PG&E interactive)
Performance Characteristics
 Shading calculation documentation
 Total system output
 Estimated kWh/month per array (shown over a 12-month period)  Warranties and guarantees
Interconnection Agreement
Provide confirmation that the PV systems will be designed to comply with applicable PG&E interconnection requirements.

Electrical Inspection, Application, and Fee Payment
 Code compliance must meet all pertinent the City and Placer County requirements. 9  Electrical Inspector Fee will be paid by the City directly.  Electrical inspection schedules shall be coordinated by the contractor and the pertinent Inspector.  The contractor is solely responsible for any revisions (and costs) as required by the Electrical Inspector to meet code compliance.

Design Services
Design Services for this project shall require a schematic design submission, a design development submission, a check set submission, and a construction document submission. A final set of as-built drawings shall also be provided. These submissions shall be delivered based on the project schedule submitted and approved.

Timeline/Project Schedule
Contractor is required to provide a proposed project schedule.

Post-Award Conference
Within 14 calendar days after receipt of the contract award a Post Award meeting will be attended by the City team members and the contractor’s personnel. At a minimum, the prime contractor’s project manager and foreman, the primary designer, and a representative of any subcontractor performing over 25-percent of the work must attend. The meeting will be held at the project location. The purpose of the meeting will be to discuss the contractor’s plan for completing the design and construction, including a construction schedule. A walkthrough of the site will occur at the end of the meeting.

Specifications
A full set of specifications shall not be required for this project. However, specifications that express all information and demonstrate sufficient detail to direct the construction work outlined in this Statement of Work shall be required. The specifications package shall be coherent enough that any contractor not familiar with the project would be able to construct the project as designed. The specifications shall include all equipment information, proposed installation and interconnection information, and performance characteristics of the system.

All drawings, estimates, calculations, and specifications shall be in English units.

The contract shall consider a construction plan producing a minimum disruption of day-to-day activities, utilities, services, etc.

Construction Drawings
At a minimum, the following drawings are required:
 Site plan including PG&E locations and connections – shall show staging and phasing requirements.  Electrical plans – including conduit routing, single line diagram and PG&E interconnection.  Electrical details
 Array structural system and mounting details
 Any drawings that may be required to install a complete project Electrical Design and Production Calculations
The contractor will provide the following calculations.  System Electrical Calculations. Provide with design development and again with 100-percent check set. 10  Energy performance calculated by a detailed PV and BESS analysis program (to be approved by owner) using proposed specific BESS components, PV modules and inverters.  All system losses (e.g., inverter, line, transformer, and parasitic loads such as BESS HVAC and monitoring systems) are to be determined and documented.
 System energy production calculation showing estimated net monthly and yearly energy output for each array
Engineer and Designer Registration Seals
Each final working drawing and each submitted specification and calculation document shall be signed by, bear the seal of, and show the California certificate number of the engineer or designer who prepared the document and / or is responsible for its preparation.

Design Submissions
For each design/drawing submissions, the City reserves the right to make comments and request changes after the receipt of the submission. Reviews will be completed by the City staff. As part of its review, the City may offer submission reviews to local code officials or consultants. The City shall provide review comments within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the 30-percent, 60-percent and 90-percent design submissions.

Design Review
The City will review the contractor design submissions to verify adherence to contract requirements. Design reviews by the City are not to be interpreted as resulting in an approval of the contractor's apparent progress toward meeting contract requirements but are intended to discover any information that can be brought to the contractor's attention that might prevent errors, misdirection, or rework later in the project. The contractor shall remain completely responsible for designing, constructing, operating, and maintaining the project in accordance with the requirements of this Statement of Work.

Resolution of Comments
The contractor shall respond in writing to all design review comments indicating what action was taken in response to each review comment. In cases other than unqualified adoption, the contractor shall provide a statement as to why the reviewer's comment is inappropriate. If the contractor believes that any of the City design comments or requested changes will result in a change in the contract cost, they shall notify the City within seven calendar days of receiving the comment(s) and provide a detailed cost estimate of anticipated contract modifications. Rejection items shall not go forward to the construction phase until adequate resolution to the rejected item has been approved by the City. Design review comments shall not relieve the contractor from compliance with terms and conditions of this contract. The contractor's comment resolution shall be transmitted to the City within seven (7) calendar days of comment receipt and incorporate discussions from the scheduled design comment review meetings.

PG&E Interconnection Agreement
The contractor shall coordinate with PG&E to ensure that the project satisfies all PG&E criteria for interconnection of the project to the PG&E electric distribution system.

This includes coordinating all negotiations, meeting with PG&E, design reviews, and participating in any needed interaction between PG&E and the City.

The contractor is responsible for preparing any required revised submissions and completing any testing for obtaining the Net Energy Metering (NEM) and interconnection agreement from the PG&E.

NOTE: The City will sign the NEM and interconnection agreements, not the contractor. 11 The contractor shall manage interconnection and startup of project in coordination with the City and PG&E.

The City shall pay any interconnection, processing, and other fees and expenses as may be required by PG&E for interconnection and operation of the project.

Quality Control Plan (QCP)
For each performance and installation requirement, the QCP shall identify the item/system to be tested, exact test(s) to be performed, measured parameters, inspection/testing organization, and the stage of construction development when tests are to be performed. Each inspection/test shall be included in the overall construction schedule. The contractor is not relieved from required performance tests should these not be included in the plan.

The QCP is intended to document those inspections and tests necessary to assure the City that product delivery, quality and performance are as required. It also serves as an inspection coordination tool between the contractor and the City. An example of these inspections/tests is the final test/inspection for overall performance compliance of the system. Results from tests and inspections shall be submitted within 24 hours of performing the tests and inspections.

At a minimum, the QCP should conform to “IEC 62446 Grid Connected Photovoltaic Systems - Minimum Requirements for System Documentation, Commissioning Tests, and Inspections (2009)”.

Performance tests will be conducted at the final commissioning/acceptance testing, and one year after the acceptance date. Performance tests will include I-V curve traces for all PV strings. For project acceptance, measured performance at maximum power point must be at least 90-percent of expected performance, which will be adjusted for concurrently measured cell temperature and plane of array (POA) irradiance. This can be accomplished using a current industry standard I-V curve tracer with capability to compare measured PV string IV curves with nameplate performance of PV string compensated for concurrent cell temperature and POA irradiance measurements. If performance is less than 90-percent at the one-year performance tests (measured using the same method as for project acceptance), contractor shall promptly troubleshoot and correct any malfunction or issues as necessary to return project to 90-percent measured performance or better. The contractor shall supply the City with detailed documentation of malfunction or errors and all corrective actions taken.

The QCP shall be prepared and submitted within 21 calendar days of the post award conference meeting and prior to any construction on-site. The QCP may be rejected as incomplete and returned for resubmission if there is any performance, condition or operating test that is not covered therein.

During construction, the contractor shall update QCP if any changes are necessary due to any changes or schedule constraints. The City shall be notified immediately of any schedule and/or procedural changes.

PV System, BESS, and Controller(s) Installation Warranty The PV system shall carry a twenty-five (25) year workmanship warranty by both the manufacturer and the installer including parts and labor. The BESS and associated Controller(s) shall carry a ten (10) year workmanship warranty by both the manufacturer and the installer including parts and labor.

Shop Drawing and Product Data Submissions
The Contractor shall submit shop drawings and product data / submittals, catalog cuts, etc. as stipulated herein.

Shop drawing/product data submissions to the City shall be made after review and approval by the contractor.

All approved product data and shop drawings shall be delivered to the City in one submission electronically. 12 The contractor shall combine all product data submission material into hard copy manuals for reference during all phases of construction. Shop drawings shall be bound with product data.

Reviews
Reviews of shop drawings and product data by the City are not to be interpreted as an approval of the Contractor's product selections. The contractor shall remain completely responsible for constructing the PV system in accordance with all contract performance requirements.

Products for Submission
The contractor shall provide shop drawings and product data for all systems, equipment, and materials.

Inspections and Tests During Construction
The contractor shall perform inspections and tests throughout the construction process including existing conditions/needs assessments, construction installation placement/qualification measurements and final inspections/tests performance certification. Periodic “quality” inspections shall also be conducted to support progress payments as identified in the contractor’s QCP.

The City shall Witness all inspections and tests, to verify documented contract assumptions, to establish work accomplishment, or to certify performance attainment shall be witnessed by the City and/or construction management (CM) and coordinated through the QCP.

Final Inspections and Test
Unless otherwise identified, manufacturer recommendations shall be followed for all inspection and test procedures. The NEC inspection shall be conducted by an electrical inspector familiar with PV and BESS systems.

Provide qualifications of the proposed inspector for review and approval prior to conducting the NEC inspections.

Commissioning shall be performed for the entire solar PV and BESS system. This data shall be used to confirm proper performance of the entire system, and that controls are in place and fully functional for proper sequence of operations in various events.

Documentation
Inspections/tests required in the QCP shall result in a written record of data/observations. The Contractor shall provide two (2) copies of documents containing all test reports/findings. Test results shall typically include the item/system tested, location, date of test, test parameters/ measured data, operating mode, contractor inspector/City witness, test equipment description and measurement technique.

Record Drawings
The contractor shall maintain on site the working record drawings of all changes/deviations from the original design. Notations on record drawings shall be made in erasable red pencil or other color to correspond to different changes or categories of work. Marked-up drawings shall always be maintained at the contractors on site construction office, available for the City and/or CM to review. Record drawings shall note related change order designations on impacted work. When shop drawings indicate significant variations over design drawings, shop drawings may be incorporated as part of record drawings. Review of record drawings may be required before monthly payments can be processed.
13 As-Built Drawings and Specifications
The Contractor shall provide "as-built drawings" and documents based upon actual site installation. Should the City determine that variations exist between finished construction and the as-built drawings, the contractor shall correct drawings to the satisfaction of the City.

The contractor shall submit two (2) hard copies and two (2) CDs containing the “as-built” drawings and specifications as CAD and PDF files.

Warranties and Guarantees
Submit specific warranties and guarantees, final certifications and similar documents to the City upon substantial completion and prior to final payment. Include copies with operations and maintenance manual. All warranties shall be signed by a principal of the contractor’s firm and be sealed if a corporation.

Maintenance Manual(s)
Provide detailed operations and maintenance manual(s) including diagrams of system components, descriptions of normal operation; descriptions of operational indicators and normal status of each, a table of modes of operation, safety considerations, preventative maintenance requirements, troubleshooting and corrective actions; and sources of spare parts and cut sheets for all components. The contractor shall prepare two (2) hardcopies and two (2) CDs containing the detailed Maintenance Manual. Submit to the City for approval.

Demonstration and Training
Provide the City staff with approved training for designated personnel in the operation of the entire photovoltaic energy system, including operations and maintenance of modules, inverter(s), transfer switches, panel board, disconnects, BESS, controls, data acquisition system and other features. Instruct the designated City personnel in removal and installation of panels, including wiring and all connections. Provide written instructions and procedures for shutdown and start-up activities for all components of the system. The City shall be permitted to video tape this training for official use.

Operations and Maintenance Service
Provide operations and maintenance of the solar array systems for one year. Work shall include all manufacturer recommended maintenance as well as a 12-month performance re-commissioning as outlined in the QCP.

The City staff shall be invited to witness all performance re-commissioning(s). A maintenance log shall be maintained to note dates, equipment maintained, and issues being resolved. Contractor should be available within 48 hours to respond to natural disasters (extreme storm, hail, wind events) to inspect array for damage.

14 Appendix A. Sedimentation/Flocculation Basin Drawings 2S-12
1 FLOOR/FOUNDATION PLAN
A
2S-13
2S-14
B
2S-15
C
2S-16
D
2S-18
F
2 3 4 5 7
1/16"=1’-0"
1 6 8
A
BCDE
F
G
359’-4"
260’-2"
1’-4"
1’-0"
16’-8"
1’-6"
(TYP)
(TYP)
(TYP)
88’-6"
7’-6" 18’-6" 18’-0" 18’-0" 18’-0" 268’-8"
9’-8"
9’-1" 9’-1" 9’-1" 9’-1" 9’-1" 9’-1"
54’-6"
2S-17
E
9"
SLOPE
(TYP)
1’-0"
8’-0" 1’-0"
39’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 32’-4" S-109 S-114 (TYP)

CONST JT
S-109

CONST JT

EXPAN JT

CONST JT

EXPAN JT

CONST JT

AS NOTED

FOR WALL REINF INFO FOR WALL REINF INFO

FOR WALL REINF INFO

FOR WALL REINF INFO
7’-11"
10’-0"
(TYP)

CL CL CL

FOR WALL REINF INFO

CONST JT
LP FL EL 385.67
2S-10
10’-0"
S-159 (SIM)
B. CROOKB. CROOK
SEE SEC E/2S-17 SEE SECTION D/2S-16 SEE SECTION B/2S-13 SEE SECTION C/2S-15
SEE SEC E/2S-17
SEE NOTE 4/-
H
J
K
L
M
N
9’-1" 9’-1" 9’-1" 9’-1" 9’-1" 9’-10"
NOTES:1.2.3.4.
37’-6" 37’-6" 34’-0"
1’-6"
55’-3"
S-116 S-123 (TYP)
HP FL EL 387.01
NEW FLOC/SED BASIN #3 S-116NEW FLOC/SED BASIN #2

EXISTING FLOC/SED BASIN
FUTURE FLOC/SED BASIN #4
S-208
TYP AROUNDENTIRE PERIMETEROF NEW BASINS.SEE CIVIL DRAWINGSFOR CONNECTIONLOCATION

STOP ALT BARS (TYP)
THE PLANT WILL BE EXPANDEDIN THE FUTURE. PROVIDE REBARCOUPLERS (S-196), WATERSTOPAND PROTECTION FOR EXPOSEDWATERSTOP (S-135) FOR ALLWALLS AND SLABS ALONG GRIDLINE N. WATERSTOP AT THIS LOCATION SHALL BE 9 INCHCENTERBULBGRIDLINES ARE LOCATED AT CENTER OF INTERIOR WALLSAND/OR COLUMNS AND OUTSIDEFACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS UNOSEE DETAIL 11/2S-17 FOR CONDUIT PLACEMENT LOCATION IN BEAMSPROVIDE ADEQUATE SUPPORTFOR EXISTING INSTRUMENT BUILDING FOUNDATION SLABPRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR NEW BASINS AT THE THREE LOCATIONS MARKED WITH THEFOLLOWING NOTATION:

M. FORDHAM

FLOCCULATION SEDIMENTATION
BASINS

STRUCTURAL
FLOOR/FOUNDATION PLAN C 2-06 BCC CONFORMED
1’-0"
42" RW
4’x 6’ SUMP4’x 6’ SUMP
6’-0"
18"X 12’-4"WALL TO DECK
1’-6"
S-130 ENTIRE LENGTH
R 6/30/08 RECORD DRAWING
Job No:

SCALE

DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKED

WARNING SHEET

IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"

THEN DRAWING IS

NOT TO SCALE
0 1

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Plot Date: File:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

TOP PLAN
2S-12
2 358’-4"
39’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 36’-0" 31’-4" S-137
S-501
S-517
(TYP)

SLOPE(TYP)
AS NOTED 2S-11
B. CROOKB. CROOK
109’-0"
37’-6" 37’-6" 34’-0"
LP EL 403.00
HP EL 403.08
EXISTING FLOC/SED BASINNEW FLOC/SED BASIN #2FUTURE FLOC/SED BASIN #4NEW FLOC/SED BASIN #3

ALUM(TYP)

FLOCCULATION SEDIMENTATION
BASINS

STRUCTURAL

TOP PLAN
HP EL 403.08
LP EL 403.00
HP EL 403.08
LP EL 403.00
7’-1"
4’-0" SQALUM(TYP)
5’-0"
(TYP)
6’-11"
S-148
(TYP)
M. FORDHAM
6’-0" 64’-0" 2’-0" SQ
(TYP OF 8) (TYP (TYP OF 6)
OF 2)
CL CL

REMOVE EXIST HANDRAILBETWEEN EXISTING POSTSAND REPLACE WITHREMOVABLE CHAIN

CONTRACTOR TO REMOVEEXISTING HANDRAIL AND REPLACE WITH REMOVABLECHAIN BETWEEN EXISTINGPOSTS THE PLANT WILL BE EXPANDEDIN THE FUTURE. PROVIDE REBARCOUPLERS (S-196), WATERSTOPAND PROTECTION FOR EXPOSEDWATERSTOP (S-135) FOR ALLWALLS AND SLABS ALONG GRIDLINE NGRIDLINES ARE LOCATED AT CENTER OF INTERIOR WALLSAND/OR COLUMNS AND OUTSIDEFACE OF EXTERIOR WALLS UNOSEE DETAIL 12/2S-17 FOR CONDUIT PLACEMENT LOCATION IN BEAMSALL NEW HANDRAIL TO BE 4RAIL TYPE NOTES:1.2.3.4.

LIGHT POLE MOUNTING PAD(TYP OF 8)
C 2-06 BCC CONFORMED
4’ x 4’ ALUM GRATING
R 6/30/08 RECORD DRAWING
Job No:

SCALE

DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKED

WARNING SHEET

IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"

THEN DRAWING IS

NOT TO SCALE
0 1

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Plot Date: File:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

ROSEVILLE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Walnut Creek PHASE lll EXPANSION
California
\\Uswck1netapp1\Design\Projects\Roseville\WTPExpan3\st 02-OCT-2008 13:58 1481248 RECORD DRAWING This record drawing has been prepared, entirely or in
part on the basis of unverified information compiled and furnished by others to the preparer who is not
responsible for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions
which may have been incorporated into the document
as a result
A
2S-13
2S-14
B
2S-15
C
2S-16
D
2S-18
F
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
A
BCDE
F
G
2S-17
E
H
J
K
L
M
N
1 "=1’-0" 2S-10
DETAIL 2
"=1’-0" 2S-11
DETAIL
1 2 3 4 5 6
A
BC
D
E
F
G
2S-18
F
2S-16
D
54’-6"
(TYP) (TYP)
(TYP)
50’-6"
5’-0" 2’-6"
2S-17
E
53’-0" 1’-6" 1’-6"
1’-0" 6’-0"
1’-0"
74’-6" 6’-0"
8’-0" 16’-2" 3’-8" 14’-4"
5’-0"
(TYP)
13’-2"
(TYP)
1’-0"
(TYP)
4’-0" 9"
4’-0" 3’-8" 12’-4"
8"
8" 1’-10"
12’-4"
11’-10"
(TYP)

SLOPE (TYP)
S-142
#5X4’-0" T&BADD’L (TYP)
HP EL403.33
LP EL403.00
SLOPE
(TYP)
2S-13
A
25’-3"

FLOCCULATION SEDIMENTATION BASINS

STRUCTURAL

DETAILS

AS NOTED
(TYP) S-501

CONST JT (TYP)MATCH LOCATIONOF WALL JOINTS
1’-0"
(TYP)
1’-6"
(TYP)
SEE NOTE 1/GENERAL NOTES
(TYP)
9’-4"
2S-12
B. CROOKB. CROOK
23’-9" 8’-6" 18’-9"
(TYP)
1’-0"
HP FL EL 384.50 (TYP)HP EL 385.25 (TYP)LP EL 385.00 (TYP) 53’-0"
H
J
K
L
M
N
53’-0" 3’-6"
1’-6"
LP FL EL 383.67 (TYP)
4’-0" 10’-1" 3’-0"
11 EQUAL
TREADS
8’-10"
54’-6"
(TYP)
(TYP)
2’-6"
1’-0" (TYP)
(TYP)
1’-0" 12’-10"
(TYP) (TYP)
6"
(TYP)

EJ IN WALKWAY(TYP OPP END)
50’-6" 4’-0"
9"
9"
S-153
S-510
3’-0"
A
BC
D
E
F
G
53’-0"
H
J
K
L
M
N
53’-0"
18 1 2 3 4 5 6

REMOVE EXIST HANDRAIL
S-517

ALUM(TYP)
22’-9"
2S-18
19 2S-18
M. FORDHAM
C 2-06 BCC CONFORMED
R 6/30/08 RECORD DRAWING
COORDINATE MECH OPENING SIZES AND LOCATIONS WITH MECHDWGS, EQUIPT MNFR’S AND PIPINGSEE SHEET 2M-13 FOR BAFFLE DETAILSCONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFYLOCATION OF EXISTING HEADERTEE FOR BASIN #2 AND NEW TEE FOR BASIN #3. INLET BOX LOCATION TO BE COORDINATED SUCH THAT INLET PIPING IS STRAIGHT GENERAL NOTES:1.2.3.

Job No:

SCALE

DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKED

WARNING SHEET

IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"

THEN DRAWING IS

NOT TO SCALE
0 1

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Plot Date: File:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

SECTION
3 "=1’-0" -
DETAIL 4

"=1’-0" -
DETAIL 5

"=1’-0" -
DETAIL
-
3 -
4 -
5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 2 6 7 8
EL 384.50
EL 383.67
8" 1’-0"
1’-0"
#9@6" EF#6@12" EF
#5@12" EF
#9@6"
7’-0"
14’-6"
#5@12" T&B
#6@12" EWEF
#6@12" EWEF
#6@12" EWT&B
#5@12" EW
#3 STIRRUP @ 12"
#6@12"T&B #9@6" T&B #6@12" T&B
#9@6" T&B
#9@6" EF
#6@6" T&B
#7@6" EF#7@6" EF
#9@12" EF
8’-0"
8’-0"
EL 384.50
1’-0"
18’-5" +/-

AS NOTED
#5@12" EWEF
5’-6"

GROUT FILL
1’-0"
EL 400.67
8’-8"
#5@12" EWEF
18’-10"
4-#9 (TYP)#3 TIE @12" (TYP)
#3TIE@12"4-#5#5 W/ STD HOOK ON EA END
9"
(TYP)
3’-9" 9"
#8@6" EWT&B
6"
8"
CL
EL 378.50 #9@6"T&B
4’-0"
4’-0"
2S-13
10’-0"
6" PIPE
2S-11
2M-9
2 EL 395.42
EL 384.50
1’-8"
4-#8 T&B

FLOCCULATION SEDIMENTATION
BASINS

STRUCTURAL
SECTION AND DETAILS - 1
B. CROOKB. CROOK
1’-0"
2’-0" 1’-6"
1’-8"
1’-8" 3’-6" 1’-8"
2’-6"
18’-6"
2S-12
3"
#5@12" EW

GROUT FILL
#5@12" EWEF W/ STD HOOK(TYP)
2S-14
6 FOR REINFINFO SEEDET 15/2S-17 FOR REINF INFO
SEE DETAIL 10/2S-15
#5@6" EWT&B
#5@6" EWT&B
M. FORDHAM
C 2-06 BCC CONFORMED
1’-6"
14’-0"
4’-0"
1’-8" 4’-4" 1’-8" 11’-9" 5’-7"
3"
3"
12’-4"
2’-6" 6’-0" 5’-6" #8@12"
#8’S SHALL IMMEDIATELYTRANSITION TO #6"S @ 12"AT (E) ONLY WIDTH OF BLOCK IS 1’-6" CENTEREDON WALL (TYP OF 4)
8"

WALL BOTTOM(TYP)
R 6/30/08 RECORD DRAWING
Job No:

SCALE

DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKED

WARNING SHEET

IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"

THEN DRAWING IS

NOT TO SCALE
0 1

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Plot Date: File:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

SECTION
EL 384.50
#6@12" T&B
#6 COUPLER@12" T&B
#9@6" T&B
6 "=1’-0" 2S-13
DETAIL
1’-0" 1’-4"
#3 STIRRUP @ 12"#5 @ 6" EWT&B#5 EF
N
SS L4X4X3/8 (TYP)SEE DETAL E/2S-3 FOR REINF INFO NOT SHOWN EL 403.17 +/-

STRUCTURAL

FLOCCULATION SEDIMENTATION BASIN

AS NOTED
3 (TYP @ & ) 4 5
1 1/2 "
1’-8" 1’-0"
14’-6"
17’-6"
#6@12" EWEFW/12" HOOKSON EA END (TYP)
5"
(TYP)
6"
(TYP)
1"(TYP)
8’-4"
EL 384.50
#6@12" T&B
6"
1’-0" 1’-8"
14’-6"
17’-6"

REMOVE EXISTINGKNOCKOUT WALL
2S-14
6" DRAIN
SECTIONS AND DETAILS - 2
B. CROOKB. CROOK
7 "=1’-0" -
DETAIL 8
"=1’-0" -
DETAIL
7 -
8 -

N M L K J H G F E D C B A
M B A

EXIST COUPLERS (TYP)

GROUT FILL (TYP)
NOTES:1. GROUT FILL FOR FLOOR SLOPE TO BE SITE CONCRETE PER SPECIFICATION 03300 SEE 2S-10FOR ELEV
SEE 2S-10FOR ELEV
SEE 2S-10FOR ELEV
KNOCKOUT WALL (SEES-159 FOR ADD’LINFO NOT SHOWN
1’-6" RECESSED GROOVE TO SLIDE BAFFLES INTO PLACE AND LOWER INTO POSITION (TYP AT TOP OF EVERY BAFFLE SUPPORT)

RECESSED
GROOVE
1’-6"
3-#7 T&B, TOP BAR WITH STD HOOK INTO FAR FACE OF NORTH WALL AND COUPLER AT FAR FACE OF SOUTH WALL5/8" DIA ADH ANCHOR W/ 10" MIN EMBED (TYP OF 4)SS 5/8" DIA BOLT (TYP OF 2)

EXIST COUPLERSAND WATERTOP (TYP)
M. FORDHAM
C 2-06 BCC CONFORMED
3’
R 6/30/08 RECORD DRAWING
4"
Job No:

SCALE

DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKED

WARNING SHEET

IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"

THEN DRAWING IS

NOT TO SCALE
0 1

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Plot Date: File:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

"=1’-0" 2S-10

SECTION
EL 384.50
1’-8" 17’-6" 1’-0" #6@12" EF 5-#5 (TYP) #5@12" (TYP)
10’-0"
#9@6" EF
#9@12" EF
(TYP)
(TYP)
#9@12" T&B
11" 7"
7" 7"

AS NOTED
4"
(TYP)
6"
#5@12" EWEF(TYP)#5@12" EWEF(TYP)
2’-0"
(TYP)
2S-15

FLOCCULATION SEDIMENTATION
BASINS

STRUCTURAL
SECTION AND DETAILS - 3
B. CROOKB. CROOK
2S-11
10’-0"

G F C B A
9 "=1’-0" -
DETAIL
-
9 #7@12" T&B
10 11
10 "=1’-0" -
DETAIL 11

"=1’-0" -
DETAIL
- -
(TYP EA HOOK)
#9@6"
#9@12" #9@6" (HOOK)
FOR ADD’L REINFINFO NOT SHOWN SEE DETAIL 10/-
M. FORDHAM
#5 DOWEL WITH 1 1/4" DIAPVC PIPE @ 12" OC, EPOXYCOAT DOWELS 8A
-
8A

"=1’-0" -
DETAIL
1’-8" 17’-6" 1’-0"
10’-0"
(TYP)
#6@12" EF
#9@6" EF
#9@12" EF
#9@6"
1 ADDENDUM NO. 2
1 1
1 12/2/05
#9 THREADEDDOWEL @ 6" T&B
C 2-06 BCC CONFORMED
BCC
1’-0"
1’-6"
R 6/30/08 RECORD DRAWING
9’-4"
4"
Job No:

SCALE

DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKED

WARNING SHEET

IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"

THEN DRAWING IS

NOT TO SCALE
0 1

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Plot Date: File:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

N M L K J H G F E D C B A
D

"=1’-0" 2S-10

SECTION
EL 383.67
2’-6"
1’-0"
3"
#8@6" EF
#8@12" EF
#6@12" T&B #8@6" T&B #8@12" T&B
(TYP)
#8@6" EF
#8@6"
(TYP)
#5@12" EW

AS NOTED
EL 403.00 EL 403.00
1’-3"1’-3"
4’-0"
EL 383.67
10’-0" 3’-6" 2’-6" 1’-8" 1’-0"
8" 5’-6" EL 396.50
2S-11
2S-16
SEE DETAIL 4/2S-13FOR REINF INFO

FLOCCULATION SEDIMENTATION
BASINS

STRUCTURAL
SECTION AND DETAILS - 4
B. CROOK
FOR REINF INFO SEE DETAIL 4/2S-13
2S-12
12 -

"=1’-0"
DETAIL 13
-
13 -
16’-0" (STOP ALT BARS)

"=1’-0"
DETAIL 12
-
G F E
B A
DRILL & EPOXY#5@12" W/ 8" EMBED (TYP)

EXISTING COUPLERS (TYP)

REMOVE EXISTHANDRAIL
#8@6" T&B
SEE NOTE 1/-
NOTES:1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE HYDROPHILIC WATERSTOP IF EXIST WATERSTOP ISN’T PRESENT OR NOT IN SATISFACTORY CONDITION C 2-06 BCC CONFORMED
6’-0"
8"
B. CROOKM. FORDHAM
8"
R 6/30/08 RECORD DRAWING
#8@12" T&B
4"
Job No:

SCALE

DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKED

WARNING SHEET

IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"

THEN DRAWING IS

NOT TO SCALE
0 1

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Plot Date: File:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

ROSEVILLE WATER TREATMENT PLANT
Walnut Creek PHASE lll EXPANSION
California
\\Uswck1netapp1\Design\Projects\Roseville\WTPExpan3\st 02-OCT-2008 13:59 1481248 RECORD DRAWING This record drawing has been prepared, entirely or in
part on the basis of unverified information compiled and furnished by others to the preparer who is not
responsible for any inaccuracies, errors or omissions
which may have been incorporated into the document
as a result

N M L K J H G F E D C B A
E
"=1’-0" 2S-10

SECTION
#8@6" EF
#8@12" EF
10’-0"
(TYP)
#8@6" T&B
10’-0"
(TYP)
#5@6" EWT&B
1’-0" 1’-4"
#5@6" EWT&B
2-#8 T&B WITH STANDARD HOOK @ EA END (TYP)#3 STIRRUP @ 12" (TYP)#5 EF (TYP)3" WIDE X 7" DEEPCONDUIT ZONECENTERED IN BEAM (TYP)

AS NOTED
14 3/4"=1’-0" -
DETAIL
EL 403.08 +/-
EL 384.25 +/-
EL 403.00
#8@6" EWT&B
#8@6" EWT&B
#8@6" EWT&B

BETWEEN TOP OF FLOOR

AND BOTTOM OF PLANK
2S-17
2S-11
SEE DET 9/2S-13 SIM (TYP)

FLOCCULATION SEDIMENTATION
BASINS

STRUCTURAL
SECTION AND DETAILS - 5
B. CROOKB. CROOK
2S-12
-
15 15
3/8"=1’-0" -
DETAIL 16
3/8"=1’-0" -
DETAIL
-
16 -
14 M
1’-0"

H G F A
#5@12"
#8@6" T&B
3" GAP

EXIST HANDRAILTO BE REMOVED

EXISTING COUPLERS (TYP)

EXISTING COUPLERS (TYP)
1’-0"
#5@6" T&BCOUPLER
C 2-06 BCC CONFORMED
R 6/30/08 RECORD DRAWING
4"
Job No:

SCALE

DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKED

WARNING SHEET

IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"

THEN DRAWING IS

NOT TO SCALE
0 1

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Plot Date: File:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

N M L K J H G F E D C B A
F
"=1’-0" 2S-10

SECTION
EL 384.50
1’-0"
#6@12" EWEF
#8@12" T&B
#8 COUPLER@ 12" T&B
#5@12" EWEF (TYP)
#6@12" EWEF
7’-8" 1’-0"

AS NOTED
#5@12" EWT&B
#8@6" EWT&B (TYP)
1’-8"

GROUT FILL
2S-11
2S-18
FOR REINF INFONOT SHOWNSEE DET 11/2S-16

FLOCCULATION SEDIMENTATION
BASINS

STRUCTURAL
SECTION AND DETAILS - 6
B. CROOKB. CROOK

GRANULAR FILL (TYP)
2S-12
17 -
20 -

"=1’-0"
DETAIL 17

"=1’-0"
DETAIL 20
-
4-#6 EF
CL
C CC C
1’-0"

CL BAFFLE &

COLUMNS
17’-6"
N M D
F
G
"=1’-0"
DETAIL 18
2S-12
"=1’-0"
DETAIL 19
2S-12
1’-8"
1’-8"
8 1/2 "
8 1/2 " 6"
CC
#6@12" (TYP)

SYMABOUT
8"
(TYP)
BAFFLE SLOT NOTES:1. SLOT WIDTH SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 3/8" GREATER THAN DRY BAFFLE BOARD WIDTH AT INNER END.2. SLOT WIDTH SHALL BE APPROXIMATELY 1" WIDER AT OPENING (OUTER END) THAN AT INNER END3. DEPTH OF ALL SLOTS SHALL BE 4"4. COORDINATE WITH SHEET 2M-9 SEE SECTION E/2S-16 FOR WALL REINF INFO
6"
(TYP)
C 2-06 BCC CONFORMED

USE ALUMINUMBAFFLE WITH CHANNEL
6-#6 EF
#3 CROSS TIES @4" ALT 135HOOKS
#3 CLOSED TIES @4"
#3 CROSS TIES @4"
3-#9 EF
R 6/30/08 RECORD DRAWING
#8@16" (TYP)
Job No:

SCALE

DESIGNEDDRAWNCHECKED

WARNING SHEET

IF THIS BAR DOES
NOT MEASURE 1"

THEN DRAWING IS

NOT TO SCALE
0 1

REV DATE BY DESCRIPTION
Plot Date: File:

CITY OF ROSEVILLE

ENVIRONMENTAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT

N M L K J H G F E D C B A
15 Appendix B. Electrical One-Line Diagram and Electrical Site Plans

16 Appendix C. Preliminary Site Plan and Solar PV Array Rendering Solar PV Canopy
Location
Existing
Substation
BESS
Location

Grant Application Development for the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Energy/BESS
Preliminary Engineering Report
May 6, 2022
City of Roseville

Document Title
Client Name
Preliminary Engineering Report
Contents
Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................... i C.1 Description of Project Components ............................................................................................................................ 1 C.2 Components ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 C.3 Drawings ............................................................................................................................................................................ 3 C.4 Feasibility Analysis ....................................................................................................................................................... 11 C.5 Construction Method ................................................................................................................................................... 14 C.6 Construction Contracts................................................................................................................................................ 15 C.7 Cost Estimate ................................................................................................................................................................. 16 C.8 Property Acquisitions .................................................................................................................................................. 17 C.9 Permits ............................................................................................................................................................................ 18 C.10 Project Schedule ........................................................................................................................................................... 19 C.11 Budget Breakdown ....................................................................................................................................................... 20 Appendix A. PG&E Carbon Footprint Calculator Assumptions Appendix B. Helioscope Solar Report
Preliminary Engineering Report
i
Introduction
This Preliminary Engineering Report has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of Form ED-900C – EDA Application Supplement for Construction Programs as part of the City of Roseville’s (Roseville) Fiscal Year 2021 American Rescue Plan Act Economic Adjustment Assistance application for the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (Barton Road WTP) Solar Energy and Storage System Project (Project). The primary goal of the Project is to provide resilient and sustainable power to Roseville’s primary water treatment facility (and their only surface water treatment plant), Barton Road WTP, ensuring a reliable water supply for residents, businesses, and critical healthcare facilities. Roseville is the largest city in Placer County, California. By 2050, Roseville's population is projected to grow to nearly 300,000 residents. The Project will make the WTP highly resilient to increasing threats to the region’s power supply by installing 998-kilowatts of direct current (kWdc) solar photovoltaic (PV) panels, and a 500-kilowatt alternating current (kWac) battery energy storage system (BESS).

Once constructed, the Project will provide a backup energy supply of a minimum of 96 hours to the Barton Road WTP in the event of a power outage, allowing for continued treatment and delivery of high-quality water to Roseville’s customers.

Barton Road Water Treatment Plant
The Project will be located at Roseville’s existing Barton Road WTP which is located in the community of Granite Bay, California approximately two miles east from Roseville’s boundaries and less than a mile west of Folsom Lake, which is owned and operated by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation. Untreated water supplies received at the Folsom Lake Pumping Plant are conveyed to the Barton Road WTP. This facility is vital to Roseville’s 148,000 residents and 9,000 businesses, millions of visitors each year, and healthcare facilities throughout the greater Sacramento-Placer region, providing up to 100 million gallons per day of treated surface water supply.

Project Need and Purpose
Energy infrastructure, a resource of critical importance to Roseville’s economic health, businesses, and residents, has become increasingly unreliable throughout the greater Sacramento-Placer region and statewide. At present, power to the Barton Road WTP is supplied by Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E). PG&E’s grid reliability has declined markedly in recent years and has become more vulnerable to extreme weather, wildfire, cyber-attack, earthquake, vandalism, grid failure, climate disruption, Public Safety Power Shutoffs, and Senate Bill 100. The Project will provide a backup energy supply of a minimum of 96 hours to the Barton Road WTP in the event of a power outage, allowing for continued treatment and delivery of high-quality water to Roseville’s customers. This has become more important than ever in light of both short-term (e.g., pandemic and public health emergency preparedness) and long-term needs (e.g., drought resiliency and wildfire protection).

The Project components include solar PV modules mounted on a racking canopy structure, a BESS, microgrid controls, a diesel generator, and electrical wiring. The entire solar PV, BESS, and microgrid controls system will be installed behind the meter which is interconnected with the PG&E distribution system that is currently serving the power load at the Barton Road WTP. The existing 500-kilowatt (kW) diesel generator that provides standby power will be included in the new microgrid. The generator will augment the solar power and BESS when there is a sustained grid power outage.

The solar array is sized to provide energy resilience during long duration power outages. The system will also provide near “net zero” energy performance for the Barton Road WTP on an annual basis and will minimize carbon emissions associated with operations. Power produced by the solar array will be approximately 1,500,000-kilowatt-hours (kWh) per year, about equal to the annual energy consumption of the Barton Road WTP. This will significantly reduce the cost of energy for Roseville and will contribute to California’s renewable Preliminary Engineering Report
ii
portfolio standards as well as potential federal or state mandates around renewable energy. The electricity delivered by PG&E has a Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission rate of 0.542 pounds of carbon dioxide per kWh. By replacing the PG&E power with the Project, the reduction of GHG emissions is more than 780,000 pounds (see Appendix A).

Energy produced by the solar array or the diesel generator (which is expected to be minimal) will be stored by the BESS. The BESS can also store power supplied by the electrical grid. When a power outage occurs, the BESS will immediately pick up the load of the Barton Road WTP. In addition, the BESS can be used daily to shave the peak energy demand. Solar PV without energy storage is not an effective way to peak shave because power production is reduced on cloudy days. Shaving the peak demand of the Barton Road WTP with energy storage not only reduces demand charges and further reduces the utility costs but also supports grid stability by reducing the load on the regional power grid when the grid is most stressed. The State of California and the California Independent System Operator are both highly in favor of projects of this type because they generate renewable energy while also supporting grid stability through peak energy demand reductions.

The Project will ensure that the Barton Road WTP can serve the community with clean, reliable water under any grid condition, as well as reduce the Barton Road WTP’s GHG emissions and contribute to the stability of the regional electrical grid. This Preliminary Engineering Report describes the Project’s components, construction methods, permitting requirements, schedule, and budget.

Preliminary Engineering Report
1 C.1 Description of Project Components
Provide a general description of all project components involved in the project. Indicate whether the project involves the construction of new infrastructure or facilities or the renovation or replacement of existing ones.

Describe each of the project components in terms of dimensions, quantities, capacities, square footage, etc.

The Project includes installation of new PV modules with a racking canopy structure, a BESS, microgrid controls, and electrical wiring at the Barton Road WTP. The existing diesel generator will be incorporated into the microgrid as a standby power supply but is expected to rarely operate. Each of these project components is further described below.

The solar array will include solar modules, often referred to as panels, direct current (DC) combiner boxes, and inverters which turn the DC power into alternating current (AC) power. The actual number of solar modules to be installed depends on the capacity of the module selected by the construction contractor and approved for use during construction. The inverters will be capable of synchronizing for operation in parallel with power supplied by PG&E. The estimated useful life of the solar PV modules is 25-years.

Solar Module Racking Canopy Structure: The solar array will include a structural steel, rigid frame, long span canopy racking system to support the solar modules. The canopy will be installed above the existing flocculation/sedimentation basins at the Barton Road WTP for an effective use of space. The structure will be designed in accordance with professional standards for construction loads (ASCE7) and solar PV arrays (SEOC PV-2). The overall footprint of canopy is approximately 56,000-square feet (160-feet by 350-feet) and the estimated useful life is 25-years.

Battery Energy Storage System: The BESS will supply up to 500-kWac of electricity demand. It will have 4,000- kWh of energy storage using lithium-ion batteries. The system will be a modular, skid mounted system with integrated cooling and fire suppression systems. The dimensions are approximately 10-feet by 40-feet. It will be located close to the existing substation in a 20-foot by 60-foot fenced enclosure. The controls and inverters have an estimated useful life of 25-years, but the batteries are estimated at 15-years.

Microgrid Controls: The controller will monitor the supply of power from the electrical grid and the new solar array, as well as control the components of the microgrid. While the controls have an estimated useful life of 20- years, this equipment may come with a recommendation to upgrade to newer generations in a shorter amount of time.

Electrical Wiring: Underground electrical conduits and wiring will connect the components of the microgrid to the existing Barton Road WTP substation with an estimated useful life of 25-years.

Preliminary Engineering Report
2 C.2 Components
A statement verifying that the project components described in the engineering report are consistent with the EDA investment project description that is provided in Section B.2 of Form ED-900. Engineering reports that describe project components that are inconsistent with the EDA investment project description in Section B.2 of Form ED900 will not be considered valid.

The project components described in Section C.1 of this Preliminary Engineering Report are consistent with the Economic Development Agency investment project description provided in Section B.2 of Form ED-900 of Roseville’s American Rescue Plan Act Economic Adjustment Assistance application.

Preliminary Engineering Report
3 C.3 Drawings
Drawings showing the general layout and location of the existing site conditions and of the project components as well as location of any project beneficiary identified in Section B.9 of Form ED-900 that provide economic justification for the project, if any. Rough dimensions and quantities for major project components should be shown and labeled on the drawings. Drawings should clearly identify the project components that are being proposed. Applicants are encouraged to clarify such drawings, for example, through color coding, labeling, and other appropriate methods.

The following figures are included:

1. Existing site layout

2. Proposed site layout

3. Project beneficiaries*

4. Solar array coverage

5. Single-line diagram

6. Electrical layout

7. Examples of solar canopies
* In addition to the residents and businesses of Roseville, Table 1 lists the project beneficiaries identified in Section B.9 of Form ED-900, including those that have submitted support letters. Figure 3 shows the locations of the listed project beneficiaries, but it must be noted that geographically, the affected/benefited area extends beyond the physical location.

Table 1. Project Beneficiaries
Beneficiary Name NAICS Code Industry Support Letter Received Penumbra Inc. 334510 Health Care ✓
Kaiser Permanente 622110 Health Care ✓
Sutter Roseville Medical
Group 000622 Health Care ✓
McKesson 446199 Health Care
Adventist Health 923120 Health Care ✓
Sun City Roseville 813910 Senior Facility ✓
Eskaton 623990 Senior Facility
Maidu Villages/Project Go
Inc. 236115 Senior Facility
PRIDE Industries 624310 Vocational
Rehabilitation Services
TSI Semiconductors 334413 Manufacturing ✓

Preliminary Engineering Report
4 Figure 1. Existing Site Layout
Existing Diesel
Generator
Existing
Substation
Preliminary Engineering Report
5 Figure 2. Proposed Project Components
Proposed Solar PV
Modules and Canopy
(160-ft x 350-ft)
Proposed
Microgrid Controls
Proposed BESS
(20-ft x 60-ft)
Proposed Electrical Route
(see Figure 6 for more
details)
Preliminary Engineering Report
6 Figure 3. Project Beneficiary Location Map
Preliminary Engineering Report
7 Figure 4. Solar Array Coverage To see the full Helioscope solar analysis report, see Appendix B.

Preliminary Engineering Report
8 Figure 5. Single-Line Diagram for the Solar Array
Preliminary Engineering Report
9 Figure 6a. Existing and Proposed Underground Electrical Figure 6b. Typical Ductbank Detail (Encasement and Support) Preliminary Engineering Report
10 Figure 7a. Solar Canopy Racking Example
Figure 7b. Solar Canopy Racking Example
Figure 7c. Proposed Solar PV Array Rendering
Preliminary Engineering Report
11 C.4 Feasibility Analysis
A feasibility analysis for the constructability of the project. Include a review of the existing conditions and note particular features, alignments, and circumstances affecting construction of project components.

This project was identified in 2021 through a comprehensive Energy Resilience Assessment of the entire Roseville water treatment and distribution system. The assessment identified priority sites and infrastructure in the utility system, evaluated the existing conditions, analyzed energy consumption and existing standby power systems, and evaluated Roseville’s ability to provide reliable standby power during a short-term or long-term outage. In addition, the assessment provided a thorough analysis of the threats to the supply of power from PG&E and the broader transmission and distribution system throughout the western United States. Many aspects were analyzed including climate disruption, cyber security, natural disasters, terrorist threats, utility company reliability, and grid instability. The assessment identified the Barton Road WTP as the highest priority site and with the least reliable power supply. The assessment also identified solar PV with battery energy storage as the optimal solution to provide energy resilience. The use of additional diesel generators and fuel storage was not considered due to the environmental liability. Other limitations for a diesel generator include use only during an outage, which results in high operational costs. A solar PV plus BESS solution, however, can be operated every day to reduce the requirements for power from the grid and to shave the peak demand helping to ease grid congestion. This provides resilience, sustainability, and economic benefits.

To develop the Project at the Barton Road WTP, a site visit was conducted to further explore the feasibility of installing the proposed system and to develop a basis of design. The existing site conditions are shown in Section C.3 Figure 1 with the proposed locations for new equipment shown in Section C.3 Figure 2. The primary challenge was to determine where to locate the solar PV array on the property due to the significant size of the system and the constrained site. Early analysis indicated that to cost effectively design and build the array, it should be one structure in a single location rather than on varied structures in multiple locations across the property. Using small systems would require exponentially more design, construction effort, and routing of utilities through a congested site. Additional criteria required minimal environmental impact from the project.

Potential sites (see Figure 8) and findings for the solar array included:

1. Top of the Clearwells - ruled out due to their inadequate size, age, and lack of information on their structural capacity

2. Sludge lagoons - ruled out due to their smaller size which would provide inadequate power production capacity

3. Small parking lot - ruled out due to their smaller size which would provide inadequate power production capacity

4. Filter deck - ruled out due to their smaller size which would provide inadequate power production capacity

5. Flocculation/sedimentation basins - selected as the optimal site because the size of the basins provides the amount of area required for the solar array to produce enough power to provide energy resilience.

6. Open space to the south of the existing facility - ruled out because the removal of dozens of protected oak trees would be required
The opportunity to design and build one larger array is significantly more cost effective than designing and building multiple arrays in the other possible locations. Both the design and construction efforts would be more costly, and the underground electrical wiring would have to be routed for much greater distances with additional conflicts with existing underground utilities. An added benefit of the flocculation/sedimentation basins is that the existing concrete basins were evaluated by structural engineers at solar racking manufacturing companies and Preliminary Engineering Report
12 they were determined to be structurally adequate to support the proposed solar array. This eliminates the need to excavate and build new foundations on the site.

To determine the power demand and electrical energy use for properly sizing the BESS, utility bills and 15- minute time interval data for the electrical consumption at the Barton Road WTP were analyzed. The engineering analysis that supports the sizing of the solar array and BESS is provided in Appendix A.

The Basis of Design development also included coordination with the WTP staff regarding the sequence of operations for the solar array, BESS, diesel generator, substation, and microgrid power systems. This alignment further ensured the feasibility of the project. Other parameters included clearance height requirements for the canopy-type array and routing requirements for underground utilities.

The Project will reduce utility costs while enhancing energy resilience at the Barton Road WTP, and it will support the stability of the regional electric grid. The system will be installed on the Barton Road WTP property behind the PG&E electric meter. Power produced by the solar PV array will power the plant and charge the battery.

During times of peak production, excess power will be net metered and supplied to the electric grid.

The use of behind the meter battery storage provides significant benefits. A PV array that is not coupled to a battery storage system performs in an intermittent fashion. When the sun shines, power is produced, and must be consumed or supplied to the grid. This can create detrimental problems for utility companies and the California Independent system operator because they must constantly match electrical generation to electrical load. When solar arrays produce at peak performance, it can be challenging for the distribution system to accept the excess available power. When the solar resource dissipates in the evening, the utility companies must quickly ramp up additional generation resources to meet the demand.

When battery storage is provided, excess generation can be stored in the battery which can be discharged when the distribution system most heavily loaded. This is typically in the evenings when the solar resource is dropping off. The importance of battery storage is evidenced by the California Self Generation Incentive Program (SGIP).

SGIP no longer incentivizes solar PV systems but provides incentives for battery storage since storage is extremely important in maintaining grid stability.

Preliminary Engineering Report
13 Figure 8. Potential Site Locations

5. Flocculation
/Sedimentation Basins

3. Parking Lot

2. Sludge Lagoons

1. Clearwells

4. Filter Deck

6. Open Space
Preliminary Engineering Report
14 C.5 Construction Method
The proposed method of construction. Indicate whether construction procurement will be done through competitive bid or other method. Indicate if any portion of the project is to be done by design/build, construction management at risk, the applicant’s own forces, or a third-party construction manager. If an alternate construction procurement method (other than traditional design/bid/build with sealed competitive bid process) is proposed, a construction services procurement plan must be provided to EDA for approval in accordance with EDA’s regulation at 13 C.F.R. § 305.6(a).

The Project will be procured through a design-build (DB) contract. Source selection will be completed through a Best Value process with both qualifications and price used as evaluation factors. The DB approach is considered optimal because the solar array, including the structural racking system, solar modules, combiner boxes, and inverters, work as a system. There are many solar developers in the industry that have proprietary systems and designs available for use. It would not be an effective use of resources to have an engineering firm complete a detailed design that dictates the structural, electrical, and material details of the array. The solar developers should be allowed to compete with their proprietary designs that have proven successful on other projects.

Preliminary Engineering Report
15 C.6 Construction Contracts
The number of construction contracts anticipated. If multiple contracts are proposed, describe the project components included in each contract. If separate contracts are anticipated for demolition or site work, the budget information cost classification should reflect the estimated costs for these components. If project phasing is proposed, a project phasing request must be provided to EDA for approval per EDA’s regulation at 13 C.F.R. § 305.9(a).

One DB contract is required for a contractor to complete the final design in accordance with the performance specifications and to construct the system. This contract will include obtaining an interconnection agreement with PG&E. An interconnection agreement is required when an entity connects generating equipment to the utility company’s distribution system.

A second contract is required for consulting services to support Roseville staff for design reviews, submittal reviews, construction monitoring, and commissioning.

Preliminary Engineering Report
16 C.7 Cost Estimate
A current detailed construction cost estimate for each of the project components. Show quantities, unit prices, and total costs and provide a basis for the determination of construction contingencies. The total of this estimate should match the construction line item of the SF-424C.

The following table provides a breakdown of estimated construction costs including labor and the main components of the proposed solar array system. Price per unit values were obtained from a combination of the Solar Energy Industries Association and National Renewable Energy Lab, as well as other similar Jacobs projects.

For complete list of estimated costs, see Section C.11. The contingency line item is based on an industry standard of 4.5-percent.

Table 2. Estimated Construction Costs
Component Price per Unit Quantity Units Subtotals
Labor, Installation, Civil Work $1 998,000 Wdc $998,000 Solar Panels $0.51 998,000 Wdc $508,980
Canopy Steel $0.40 998,000 Wdc $399,200
Wire $0.08 998,000 Wdc $79,840
Inverters $0.08 998,000 Wdc $79,840
Interconnection $0.40 998,000 Wdc $399,200
BESS Inverters $1,500 500 Wac $750,000
BESS Batteries $300 4000 Wh $1,200,000
Microgrid Control(s) $325,000 1 each $325,000
Contingency $0.25 998,000 Wdc $249,500
Total $4,989,560
Definitions:

Wdc – watts of power, direct current
Wac – watts of capacity for inverters, alternating current Wh – watt hours of energy produced or stored in batteries Preliminary Engineering Report
17 C.8 Property Acquisitions
Real property acquisition. If the budget includes costs for acquisition of real property, include a current fair market value appraisal completed by a certified appraiser for the property to be purchased.

No property acquisition is required for the Project. All equipment will be located on Roseville property and the substation is owned by Roseville.

Preliminary Engineering Report
18 C.9 Permits
A list of all permits required for the proposed project and their current status. Identify all permits required; include the timeline to obtain the permits and discuss how the permitting relates to the overall project schedule. If the project crosses a railroad right-of-way or is within a railroad right-of-way, explain any permitting or approvals that may be required from the railroad or other authority and the timeframe for obtaining these permits or approvals.

The Project is located at the Barton Road WTP, which is Roseville property. The Project will include no offsite connections. Expected permits required for the Project include the following:
• City of Roseville Building Permit: Roseville’s Building Division will need to review the new electrical hookups to ensure code compliance. An application will be filed when the contractor advances the project to final design. With project construction expected to start in December 2023, the application should be filed in Spring 2023.
• PG&E Interconnection Agreement: PG&E will require an interconnection agreement for the new system.

The process will be initiated when the contractor advances the project to final design. With project construction expected to start in December 2023, the application should be filed in Spring 2023.

Local environmental review will be limited to Roseville’s preparation of a California Environmental Quality Act exemption. There are no natural or cultural features on the site that would require federal, state, or local permits.

Preliminary Engineering Report
19 C.10 Project Schedule
An overall estimated project schedule. This schedule should agree with the project schedule outlined in the ED900. Include the number of months for each of the following:
• design period;
• period of time to obtain required permits;
• period of time to obtain any required easements or rights-of-way; • solicitation of bids and awarding of contracts, and
• construction period.

Table 3 shows the planning-level procurement and project schedule. Assumptions include EDA grant approval will be provided by mid-September 2022 followed shortly by an award of a DB contract (no bids).

Table 3. Estimated Procurement Schedule
Stage
Duration
(months)
Approximate Completion Dates
RFP Released by the City - November 25, 2022
Pre-Proposal Conference 0.5 December 2, 2022
Deadline for Final Questions 0.25 December 7, 2022
City Responses to Written Questions 0.25 December 9, 2022 Proposal Submission Deadline 0.5 December 21, 2022
Interviews as needed 1 January 18, 2023
Contract Negotiations 1 February 17, 2023
Contract Approval by City Council 2 April 14, 2023
Commencement of Services 0.25 April 21, 2023
Design 6-8 December 2023
Permit Acquisition 3-6 Concurrent with Design
Interconnection Agreement with PG&E 12 Concurrent with Design and Construction
Construction and Equipment
Procurement 9-12 December 2024
Preliminary Engineering Report
20 C.11 Budget Breakdown
Overall project budget breakdown. For each “cost classifications” line item that the applicant indicates will be included in the project budget on Form SF-424C, the applicant must provide a breakdown of the proposed project costs and tasks that is consistent with the detailed construction cost estimate for the project provided in the PER.

Table 4 provides the overall estimated project cost breakdown using cost classifications from Form SF-424C. As mentioned in Section C.7, price per unit values were obtained from a combination of the Solar Energy Industries Association and National Renewable Energy Lab, as well as other similar Jacobs projects.

The following two funding sources will be used for the costs listed below. No other federal funds are expected at this time.
• Federal Share – ED-900C EDA
• Non-Federal Share - this local agency fund includes the City of Roseville Water Rehabilitation Fund issued through water utility rate revenue for rehabilitation projects The funding source has been identified for each line item, as well as a summary of the total requested federal and non-federal shares. As previously agreed, the federal share will cover 80-percent of the total allowable cost with the non-federal share matching the remaining amount.

Table 4. Estimated Budget Breakdown
Component Price per Unit Quantity Units Subtotals Funding Source

1. Administrative and Legal Expenses
Management and Reporting $435,657 1 Each $ 435,657 Non-Federal Share

2. Land, Structures, Rights-of-Way, Appraisals, etc.

N/A $ - -

3. Relocation Expenses and Payments
N/A $ - -

4. Architectural and Engineering Fees
Design & Development $0.30 998,000 Wdc $ 299,400 Non-Federal Share

5. Other Architectural and Engineering Fees
Permitting $0.05 998,000 Wdc $ 49,900 Non-Federal Share

6. Project Inspection Fees
Owner’s Project Manager $0.42 998,000 Wdc $ 419,160 Non-Federal Share

7. Site Work
N/A $ - -

8. Demolition and Removal
N/A $ - -

9. Construction
Labor, Installation, Civil
Work $1 998,000 Wdc $ 998,000 Federal Share

10. Equipment
Preliminary Engineering Report
21 Component Price per Unit Quantity Units Subtotals Funding Source Solar Panels $0.51 998,000 Wdc $ 508,980 -
Canopy Steel $0.40 998,000 Wdc $ 399,200 -
Wire $0.08 998,000 Wdc $ 79,840 -
Inverters $0.08 998,000 Wdc $ 79,840 -
Interconnection $0.40 998,000 Wdc $ 399,200 -
BESS Inverters $1,500 500 Wac $ 750,000 -
BESS Batteries $300 4000 Wh $ 1,200,000 -
Microgrid Control(s) $325,000 1 Each $ 325,000 -
Equipment Total $ 3,742,060 Federal Share

11. Miscellaneous
Margin – Overhead & Profit $0.40 998,000 Wdc $ 399,200 Non-Federal Share

12. Subtotal $ 6,343,377

13. Contingencies
Contingency* $0.25 998,000 Wdc $ 249,500
Federal Share ($205,676)
Non-Federal Share ($43,824)

14. Subtotal $ 6,592,877

15. Project (Program) Income
N/A $ - -

16. TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 6,592,877
Costs Not Allowable for Participation (Line 1) $ 435,657 Total Allowable Cost $ 6,157,220

17. Federal Assistance Requested (80%) $ 4,925,776
Definitions:

Wdc – watts of power, direct current
Wac – watts of capacity for inverters, alternating current Wh – watt hours of energy produced or stored in batteries * The contingency estimate is based upon an industry standard of 4.5- to 5-percent of construction.

Preliminary Engineering Report
Appendix A. PG&E Carbon Footprint Calculator Assumptions 1 Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Carbon Footprint Calculator
Assumptions
General Information

1. Typical PG&E Residential Customer – Monthly Household Energy Use1 – Electricity Usage: 540 kilowatt-hours (kWh)
– Natural Gas Usage: 45 therms (winter 60 / summer 24)

2. ClimateSmart Rates1
– Electricity: $0.00254 per kWh
– Natural Gas: $0.06528 per therm

3. PG&E Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Emissions Rates2
– Electric: 0.524 lbs CO2 per kWh
– Natural Gas: 13.446 lbs CO2 per therm
Minimizing Your Carbon Footprint – Estimated Avoided CO2 Emissions

5. Install Solar Electric Panels
Avoid 3,300 lbs CO2 per year

Assumptions:
– Typical residential system is 3-5 kW.
– 18% capacity factor.
– Operating 8,760 hours per year.
– PG&E emissions rate (electric): 0.524 lbs CO2 per kWh.

– Emissions Rate for Natural Gas: 13.446 lbs CO2 per therm.9

Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Project
Draft EDA Environmental Narrative
3/3/2022
Environmental Narrative Requirements
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires Federal agencies to assess the potential environmental impacts associated with proposed federal actions, including financial assistance.

Applicants are encouraged to contact their designated Economic Development Representative or the applicable EDA Regional Environmental Officer with questions regarding this template and/or the appropriate level of documentation (please see the EDA website or the applicable Federal Funding Opportunity for contact information). Resources of available information are listed in many of the sections. If you are using a locally saved copy of this template, please check EDA’s website to confirm this is the current version.

For further information regarding EDA’s obligations under NEPA, please refer to the regulations for implementing NEPA at 40 C.F.R. 1500-1508. The Council on Environmental Quality’s 2007 guidance document “A Citizen’s Guide to the NEPA” is another resource available online.

Several issues discussed in the environmental narrative below may require consultation with other State or Federal agencies at a later date (for example, the State Historic Preservation Office, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS)). While EDA does not require that applicants complete such consultations before submitting an initial application, applicants should be aware that in the event their project is selected for further evaluation for funding, EDA may delegate these consultations to the applicant and expect them to be completed in an expeditious manner and prior to approval of an award.

Applicants must provide information on the following items in the environmental narrative. For any area in which the applicant asserts that an item is not applicable to a project, provide an explanation.

A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION

1. Beneficiaries
Identify any existing businesses or major developments that will benefit from the proposed project, and those that will expand or locate in the area because of the project.

The City of Roseville (Roseville) is proposing to construct a solar array at the Barton Road Water Treatment Plant (Barton Road WTP) (Proposed Project). The Barton Road WTP is the sole source of treated service water for the Roseville. The Proposed Project would ensure that the Roseville can supply the community with drinking water despite challenges with the supply of electrical power from the grid. In addition, the battery energy storage system (BESS), a component of the Proposed Project, can be used to shave the peak energy demand. Shaving the peak demand with energy storage not only reduces demand charges and further reduces the utility costs at the Barton Road WTP, but it also supports grid stability by reducing the load on the regional power grid when the grid is most stressed. Therefore, the Proposed Project would serve the community with clean water under any grid conditions, but it also increases the generation of clean energy while contributing to grid stability.

2. Proposed Construction
As an exhibit to this Narrative, provide a topographical map of the project area and a site map (with legend and north arrow) displaying the project location and boundaries, existing and EDA Environmental Narrative Requirements
2 proposed project components and location of all sites and/or companies benefitting from the proposed project. The documents should be of sufficient clarity for adequate interpretation of the Applicant’s intentions.

Describe the project construction components in detailed, quantifiable terms. Describe the project location, proposed construction activities (e.g., grading, trenching), and schedule. It is sufficient to simply reference the Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) here if a PER containing this information has been submitted or will be submitted concurrently. See the mock example below for the level of specificity expected by EDA:

The City of ______________ is proposing to construct a 30-inch (in) water line which would be constructed within an existing 50-foot City of __________ right-of-way (ROW) and measure 1,220 linear feet (lf). The project is located within Township 39N, Range 10E, Section 24 in the City of ________, _______ County, [[[State]]]. The project would be constructed over a three-month period from April June 2011. Construction of this project would entail trenching a 1 ft wide by 3 ft. deep ditch and installing the 30-in. pipe within the existing ROW. Total land disturbance will be 2.1 acres.

The construction staging area would be located entirely within the existing ROW. Minor maintenance would occur during the operation of the waterline, but would not entail any ground disturbing activities.

Proposed Project Location: The Proposed Project is located within Township 10 North, Range 7 East, Section 14 in the Roseville and within Placer County. See Figure 1-1 for the regional location of the Proposed Project.

Figure 1-1 Proposed Project Regional Location
Proposed Project Description: The Proposed Project includes a solar photovoltaic (PV) array for the generation of electrical power, a BESS, and controls. The system would be a behind the meter microgrid that is interconnected with the Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E) distribution EDA Environmental Narrative Requirements
3 system that is currently serving the load at the Barton Road WTP. The existing 500-kilowatt (kW) diesel generator that provides standby power would be included in the microgrid. The generator would augment the solar power and BESS in the event of a sustained grid power outage.

Proposed Project Components:
• Solar Photovoltaic Modules – 998 kW direct current (dc) / 818 kW alternating current (ac). Using solar panels equivalent to SunPower SPR-P19-400-COM, the entire array includes approximately 2,500 solar modules. The solar modules would include DC combiner boxes and inverters which turn the dc power into ac power. The actual number of solar modules to be installed depends on the capacity of the module selected and approved for use during construction. The total required annual energy production would be 1,500,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh). The inverters would be capable of synchronizing for operation in parallel with power supplied by PG&E.
• Solar Module Racking Canopy Structure – The array would include a structural steel, rigid frame, long span canopy racking system. The canopy would be installed to support the solar modules above the sedimentation/flocculation basin for an effective use of space. The structure would be designed in accordance with ASCE7 and SEOC PV-2. • Battery Energy Storage System – The BESS system would be able to supply up to 500 kWac of electricity. It would have 4,000 kWh of energy storage using lithium-ion batteries. The system would be a modular, skid mounted system with integrated cooling and fire suppression systems. It would be located close to the existing substation. • Microgrid Controls – The controller would monitor the supply of power from the electrical grid and the solar array, and it would control the components of the microgrid. • Diesel Generator – The existing 500 kW diesel generator would be connected to the microgrid to provide standby power.
• Electrical Wiring – Underground electrical conduits and wiring would connect the components of the microgrid to the existing Barton Road WTP substation.

See Figures 1-2, 1-3, and 1-4 on the following page for the site layout, solar array coverage above the sedimentation/flocculation basins, and solar canopy racking examples.

EDA Environmental Narrative Requirements
4 Source: Jacobs 2022
Figure 1-2 Study Area and Site Layout
Source: Jacobs 2022
Figure 1-3 Solar Array Coverage Above the Sedimentation/Flocculation Basins EDA Environmental Narrative Requirements
5 Source: Jacobs 2022
Figure 1-4 Solar Canopy Racking Example
Proposed Project Construction:

The Proposed Project would be constructed over a 9- to 12-month period from January 2024 through December 2024.

The solar PV modules would be manufactured at an off-site location and transported to the project site via truck. Solar PV panels and equipment would be installed on structural steel canopies mounted on vertical posts ranging from heights of approximately 10-feet above the top of the flocculation/sedimentation basins on the southeast side and 20-feet above the top of the flocculation/sedimentation basins to the northwest side. The tops of existing flocculation/sedimentation basins are approximately 13-feet above ground level on the Southwest side and 18-feet above ground level on the Northwest side. This would result in the top elevation of the solar PV canopies at approximately 23-feet above ground level on the Southwest side and 38-feet above ground level on the Northwest side. As described below, environmental commitments would be taken to avoid/protect the existing trees and potential nesting birds near the Proposed Project site. No trees will be removed as part of the Proposed Project.

The vertical posts would be bolted to the top of the existing concrete walls that enclose and support the flotation/sedimentation basins. The solar PV modules would minimize glare using an anti-reflective coating. Manually controlled lights would be installed at equipment stations.

Lighting would be shielded and downward facing to avoid light spilling on to surrounding properties. Modules would be designed to minimize glare using an anti-reflective coating.

Electrical equipment, including the BESS, (20-feet by 60-feet) would be located to on the Northwest side of the Barton Road WTP site.

Underground electrical conduits and wiring would connect the components of the microgrid to the existing Barton Road WTP substation, which would require excavating a 4-foot wide by 100- foot-long trench. The underground electrical conduits for connection of the solar PV to the BESS and micro grid would entail another 4-feet-wide by approximately 960-feet long trench within the existing Barton Road WTP using asphalt cutting and backhoe equipment. The total land disturbance would be approximately 4,240-square feet.

Operation of the Proposed Project would be automated and unstaffed. Production, system health and on-site weather data would be monitored and gathered electronically. Due to annual rain EDA Environmental Narrative Requirements
6 events at the Barton Road WTP site, it is anticipated that washing of the solar PV panels to remove debris and improve energy production will not be required.

3. Need and Purpose
Provide a brief summary of the underlying need and purpose of the proposal for EDA funding.

The purpose of the Proposed Project is to serve the community with clean water by the Barton Road WTP under any grid conditions and increase the generation of clean energy for Roseville.

This project is needed to provide grid stability and energy resilience during long duration power outages and reduce utility costs.

4. Alternatives to the Proposed Project
Based in the Need and Purpose summary above, provide a detailed description of alternative actions that were considered during the project planning but were not selected (e.g., alternative locations, designs, scopes, other projects having similar benefits, and a “no project” alternative).

Explain why this project/site was selected as the preferred alternative. Provide detail on why other alternatives were rejected (e.g., did not meet the purpose and need of the project, implicated more environmental receptors, had greater climate impacts or were at greater risk to climate change than the proposed action). If the selected project would impact wetlands or floodplains, please provide a detailed description of alternatives to those proposed impacts.

Proposed Project alternatives were identified in 2021 through a comprehensive Energy Resilience Assessment (assessment) of the entire Roseville water treatment and distribution system. The assessment identified priority sites and infrastructure in the utility system, evaluated the existing conditions, analyzed energy consumption and existing standby power systems, and evaluated the Roseville’s ability to provide reliable standby power during a short-term or long-term outage. In addition, the assessment provided a thorough analysis of the threats to the supply of power from PG&E and the broader transmission and distribution system throughout the western United States. Many aspects were analyzed including climate disruption, cyber security, natural disasters, terrorist threats, utility company reliability, and grid instability. The assessment identified the Proposed Project at the Barton Road WTP as the highest priority site and with the least reliable power supply. The assessment also identified solar PV with battery energy storage as the optimal alternative to provide energy resilience. The use of additional diesel generators and fuel storage was not considered due to the environmental liability. Other limitations for a diesel generator include use only during an outage, which results in high operational costs. A solar PV plus BESS solution, however, can be operated every day to reduce the requirements for power from the grid and to shave the peak demand helping to ease grid congestion. This provides resilience, sustainability, and economic benefits.

In developing the Proposed Project, a site visit at Barton Road WTP was conducted to further explore solar PV and BESS design alternatives. The primary challenge was to determine where to locate the solar PV array on the Barton Road WTP due to the significant size of the solar PV and BESS system and the constrained Barton Road WTP site. Early analysis indicated that to cost effectively design and build the array, it should be one structure in a single location rather than on varied structures in multiple locations across the Barton Road WTP. Other design alternatives included considering which areas of the Barton Road WTP had existing concrete basins structurally adequate to support the solar PV and BESS; clearance height requirements for the EDA Environmental Narrative Requirements
7 canopy-type array and routing requirements for underground utilities; and environmental considerations (e.g., existing trees within and near the Barton Road WTP).

In summary, various alternative locations and design configurations were considered during the development of the Proposed Project. However, these were not selected due power supply reliability, design constructability, and environmental considerations.

B. HISTORIC/ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Identify any known historic/archeological resources within the project site(s) or area of potential effect that are either listed on the National Register of Historic Places or considered to be of local or State significance and perhaps eligible for listing on the National Register. In many states, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) maintains GIS databases of historic properties and cultural resources. Delineate an Area of Potential Effect (APE) for the project. The APE is the geographic area or areas within which a proposal may cause changes in the character or use of historic properties, which would include (but is not limited to) any new development or renovation by the beneficiary facilitated by the proposed EDA project. Discuss the potential impacts of the project on culturally significant resources and provide a determination as to whether there will be: no historical properties/cultural resources present; no historical properties/cultural resources adversely affected; or historical properties/cultural resources adversely affected.

Note that the applicant is not required to contact the SHPO until directed to do so by EDA. If comments from the SHPO have already been received, they should be attached along with copies of the information provided to the SHPO. If you wish to initiate early consultation, please consult the website of the appropriate SHPO for instructions on required information.

See Attachment A, “Barton Road Water Treatment Plant Solar Project – Preliminary Cultural Resources Assessment.” As stated in Attachment A, there are no previously recorded cultural resources in the APE and the Proposed Project has a low potential to encounter previously undiscovered cultural resources during project implementation.

C. AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT
For the resource areas identified below, indicate potential direct and indirect impacts from proposed project activities and specify proposed measures to mitigate probable impacts. Direct impacts are caused by the proposed action and occur at the same time and place. Indirect impacts are those that are caused by a proposed action, but that may occur later in time or farther removed in distance, relative to the primary impacts of the proposed action (40 C.F.R. Section 1508.8) Development induced by the proposed project would be an example of an indirect impact.

1. Affected Area
Describe the general project area, including topography, historic land usages, unique geological features, and economic history. Provide site photographs if available. Identify native vegetation and wildlife found in the project area or its immediate vicinity. Describe the amount and type of vegetation in the project area and indicate the impact to vegetation if removed (e.g., 1.2 acres of early successional native hardwood forest). Identify any designated State and National Parks, National Wildlife Refuges, or National Game Preserves located on or in the vicinity of the EDA Environmental Narrative Requirements
8 proposed project activities. Identify any Wilderness Areas, as designated or proposed under the Wilderness Act, or wild or scenic rivers, as designated or proposed under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, or other lands protected under state or federal law that are located on or in the vicinity of the proposed project activities.

1. Please describe any direct effects

2. Please describe any indirect effects
The Proposed Project is located within the existing Barton Road WTP located in Roseville and is surrounded by residential development on the north, east, and south sides and Barton Road and a golf course to the west. The Barton Road WTP property is fenced and is lined with native oaks and ornamental trees. The property is partially developed and consists of existing water treatment infrastructure including buildings, roads, constructed wastewater ponds, and sedimentation/flocculation basins, which is where the Proposed Project activities will occur (See Figure 1-2). Areas within the Barton Road WTP property that are outside the existing facility and are not developed are comprised of approximately 15 acres of mixed oak woodland. Rose Spring Ditch, an intermittent drainage, parallels the most southern road of the Barton Road WTP before turning south and exiting the property. There are no protected or designated State or National lands within the Proposed Project area. The proposed solar panel array and associated infrastructure will be constructed within the existing disturbed areas and will not directly impact Rose Spring Ditch or remove oak woodland habitat.

2. Coastal Zones
Indicate whether the project is located within a designated coastal zone subject to the Coastal Zone Management Act. Information on coastal zone boundaries is available on the NOAA’s website. Identify any shorelines, beaches, dunes, or estuaries within or adjacent to the project site(s) and explain how the proposed project is consistent with the state’s Coastal Zone Management Plan. If state concurrence is required, identify the state’s Coastal Zone Management Agency.

The Proposed Project site is not within a Coastal Zone.

3. Wetlands
Identify any wetlands within or adjacent to the project site(s). If available, provide an on-site wetland/waters delineation performed in accordance with the 1987 (or current version) USACE Wetland Delineation Manual, as amended. Provide any correspondence from USACE, including any jurisdictional determination or permit documents.

1. Provide a determination of direct and indirect effects including the amount of jurisdictional waters affected by type (e.g. 1.1 acres of palustrine emergent wetlands would be impacted by the proposed project).

2. If any wetlands would be impacted by the project, provide an analysis of alternatives to wetland impact in this section or in the Alternatives to the Project section above.

3. Describe any mitigation plans here or in Section D below.

Also indicate if there are any proposed overwater structures that could impact navigable waters as defined in 33 CFR part 329.

If wetlands, streams, or navigable waters may be impacted, it is recommended that Applicants contact USACE concerning any jurisdictional waters resources.

EDA Environmental Narrative Requirements
9 An aquatic resource delineation of the property has not been conducted. However, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory database was consulted as well as review of the Folsom USGS Topographic map and historic and current aerial imagery. There are no wetlands or other waters within the Proposed Project site. However, there is a named ditch, Rose Spring Ditch (mentioned above), that runs just south of the Proposed Project within the Barton Road WTP property. The proposed solar array will be constructed over the top of the sedimentation/flocculation basins and the associated infrastructure will be placed on existing paved surfaces. Thus, there will be no impacts to wetlands or Rose Spring Ditch.

4. Floodplains
Please state whether the project is located within a mapped 100- or 500-year floodplain. Provide a FEMA floodplain map (with the map number and effective date) displaying the project location and boundaries, existing and proposed project components, and location of all sites and/or companies benefiting from the proposed project. The document should be of sufficient clarity for adequate interpretation of the applicant’s intentions.

Floodplain maps can be viewed and printed from FEMA’s website. If FEMA floodplain maps do not exist in the project area, provide a letter from a Professional Engineer regarding the presence or absence of a 100-year floodplain.
i) Describe direct and indirect effects to 100-year floodplains, if any. ii) If any 100-year floodplains would be impacted by the project, provide an analysis of alternatives to floodplain impact in this section or in the Alternatives to the Project section above.
iii) Indicate whether the Applicant’s community participates in the National Flood Insurance Program.
iv) Indicate if a critical action (e.g., emergency response facility, hospital, wastewater treatment plant) is being located within the 500-year floodplain.

The Proposed Project site is outside of the 100–500-year floodplain (Figure 1-5).

EDA Environmental Narrative Requirements
10 Source: FEMA 2022
Figure 1-5 National Flood Hazard Layer

5. Climate Change
Identify any current or potential risks to the project due to climate change (e.g., flooding, wildfires, sea level rise, severe weather), utilizing federal resources, including the National Climate Assessment. Describe any steps taken in the planning and design of the project to mitigate those risks, including utilizing federal resources such as the U.S. Climate Resilience Toolkit. Identify any ways in which the project may contribute to future climate risks, such as by increasing flood risks, and any potential measures for mitigating those contributions. Describe any steps taken to reduce the project’s immediate and future carbon footprint (e.g., use of renewable building materials, incorporation of energy-efficient design features).

The Proposed Project site is not located within a flood hazard zone or wildfire hazard zone.

The Proposed Project includes the addition of solar PV modules to the existing Barton Road WTP, as well as a BESS to store energy produced by the solar array. The system would be designed so that the solar array will produce energy that is approximately equal to the annual energy consumption of the Barton Road WTP. This will significantly reduce the cost of energy for the Barton Road WTP, as well as minimize carbon emissions. Additionally, the BESS can be utilized daily to reduce the peak energy demand. As the Proposed Project would generate clean energy while also supporting grid stability by reducing peak energy demand, the Proposed Project would have no impact as it relates to climate change.

EDA Environmental Narrative Requirements
11 6. Endangered Species
Provide a list of all threatened, endangered, and candidate species located in or near the project area, including any proposed development by the beneficiary, and the immediate vicinity.

Identify these species’ potential or existing habitat, and critical habitat designations in the project area. Identify the potential for direct or indirect impacts on these species. Critical habitat designations, lists of protected species by county, and information on effect determinations are available on the FWS website. The FWS’ web-based Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPaC) may also be useful for the early planning stage of a project. If an Effect Determination or Biological Assessment has been completed for any of the species listed, please provide. Attach any correspondence with FWS that exists related to their proposal. For projects with possible impacts to fisheries and marine/coastal species, provide any correspondence with NMFS.

ESA reviewed publicly available and subscription-based data on biological resources. The following data sources assisted in this analysis:
• Topographic maps (Folsom and surrounding eight 7.5-minute quadrangles) • Historic and current aerial imagery
• The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) for the quadrangles indicated below
• A USFWS species list for the Treatment Plant property generated using the online Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) database Several wildlife species known to occur in or within the vicinity of the survey area are protected under Federal and/or State endangered species laws or have been designated as species of special concern by CDFW.

A list of special-status wildlife species with potential to occur in or in the vicinity of the survey area was compiled from a nine-quadrangle search of the CNDDB (CDFW 2022) and a search of the USFWS IPaC endangered species database (USFWS 2022). The search encompassed the following 7.5-minute U.S. Geological Survey topographic quadrangles:
• Roseville
• Rocklin
• Pilot Hill
• Citrus Heights
• Folsom
• Clarksville
• Carmichael
• Buffalo Creek
• Folsom SE
The Proposed Project study area (see Figure 1-2) has been developed with existing structures and is located within a developed area, the project area lacks habitat that would be suitable for animal or plant species listed as threatened or endangered. There are no critical habitat designations for this area.

EDA Environmental Narrative Requirements
12 The existing building and infrastructure, as well as the undeveloped area to the south and west of the Proposed Project, may support habitat for nesting birds and roosts for bats. However, no vegetation will be removed and structures that could support nesting birds or roosting bats are not anticipated to be directly impacted. Additionally, construction of the solar array and associated infrastructure may create some dust, noise, and other indirect impacts; however, these impacts would be temporary. Operation of the Proposed Project is not anticipated to create excess dust, noise, or other indirect impacts beyond what the existing Barton Road WTP.

Construction activities for the Proposed Project would not interfere with local movement of native resident or migratory wildlife species. Noise from construction of the Proposed Project is not anticipated to temporarily alter the foraging patterns of resident wildlife species and is not anticipated to substantially interfere with foraging because these species are acclimated to noise associated with daily operations.

Environmental Commitments
To avoid potential impacts to nesting birds, construction will occur outside the nesting bird season, typically February 1-August 31 or nesting bird surveys will be conducted within 100 feet of work prior to the start of construction. If nests are found, construction will not occur until the birds have fledged the nest.

In addition, a certified arborist will be consulted following final design of the Proposed Project and will provide direction on avoidance/protection for existing trees within 100 feet of the proposed work, as needed. As stated above, no trees will be removed as part of the Proposed Project.

References:

California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB). 2022. Special Animals List. Periodic publication. California Department of Fish and Wildlife. January 30, 2022.

United States Fish and Wildlife (USFWS). 2022. Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) database. February 15, 2022.

7. Land Use and Zoning
Describe the present formal zoning designation and current land use of the project site and adjacent land parcels. The areas include: the site of construction activities, adjacent areas, and areas affected by the primary beneficiaries. Land uses to be considered include, but are not limited to, industrial, commercial, residential, agriculture, recreational, woodlands, mines/quarries, and open spaces. Please indicate whether the project is located entirely within a city limit.

Roseville City CouncilJune 15, 2022

Roseville City Council
June 15, 2022